2011 vs 2012 S02 and NOx Comparisons, Quarterly Acid Rain Program and Clean Air Interstate Rule Emissions, Emission Rates, and Heat Input Changes at Facilities (Coal Units < 2011 data are final, 2012 are preliminary data submitted to EPA from sources as of August 1, 2012. EPA will update as it receives and verifies data 2011 S02 2012 S02 Emissions Emissions 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 Facility Name State County Quarter (tons) (tons) Emissions (tons) Emissions (%) Barry AL Mobile 1 2,607 2,566 -41 -2% Barry AL Mobile 2 3,509 2,946 -563 -16% Charles R Lowman AL Washington 1 692 964 272 39% Charles R Lowman AL Washington 2 1,276 450 -826 -65% Colbert AL Colbert 1 5,394 1,685 -3,708 -69% Colbert AL Colbert 2 5,168 3,661 -1,507 -29% E C Gaston AL Shelby 1 24,823 7,664 -17,159 -69% E C Gaston AL Shelby 2 26,744 18,429 -8,315 -31% Gadsden AL Etowah 1 1,024 39 -985 -96% Gadsden AL Etowah 2 1,036 55 -980 -95% Gorgas AL Walker 1 2,824 139 -2,685 -95% Gorgas AL Walker 2 2,620 93 -2,527 -96% Greene County AL Greene 1 8,464 5,404 -3,060 -36% Greene County AL Greene 2 8,024 8,208 185 2% James H Miller Jr AL Jefferson 1 2,261 116 -2,145 -95% James H Miller Jr AL Jefferson 2 878 150 -728 -83% Widows Creek AL Jackson 1 2,096 1,075 -1,021 -49% Widows Creek AL Jackson 2 989 1,313 324 33% Flint Creek Power Plant AR Benton 1 2,057 2,405 348 17% Flint Creek Power Plant AR Benton 2 1,977 1,510 -468 -24% Independence AR Independence 1 7,595 9,846 2,251 30% Independence AR Independence 2 5,895 9,210 3,314 56% Plum Point Energy Station AR Mississippi 1 764 799 35 5% Plum Point Energy Station AR Mississippi 2 550 832 282 51% White Bluff AR Jefferson 1 8,180 7,744 -436 -5% White Bluff AR Jefferson 2 8,095 7,586 -509 -6% Apache Station AZ Cochise 1 963 239 -723 -75% Apache Station AZ Cochise 2 890 143 -747 -84% Cholla AZ Navajo 1 1,716 1,418 -298 -17% Cholla AZ Navajo 2 1,566 1,384 -182 -12% 1 of 90 ------- 3nly) 2011 S02 2012 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2011 NOX 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 2011 NOX Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emissions Emissions NOX Emissions 2012 vs 2011 NOX Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (%) (tons) (tons) (tons) Emissions (%) (lb/mmBtu) 0.41 0.55 0.14 33% 1,673 1,317 -357 -21% 0.26 0.52 0.47 -0.06 -11% 1,713 1,283 -430 -25% 0.26 0.14 0.33 0.18 127% 1,390 543 -847 -61% 0.29 0.26 0.27 0.01 4% 819 262 -557 -68% 0.16 0.72 0.70 -0.02 -3% 2,556 984 -1,572 -62% 0.34 0.74 0.73 0.00 -1% 2,359 1,864 -495 -21% 0.34 2.06 1.24 -0.82 -40% 4,283 1,667 -2,617 -61% 0.36 1.61 1.48 -0.13 -8% 4,833 3,017 -1,816 -38% 0.29 2.16 0.12 -2.04 -95% 231 39 -192 -83% 0.49 2.18 0.16 -2.02 -93% 244 42 -202 -83% 0.51 0.37 0.03 -0.34 -92% 2,122 821 -1,301 -61% 0.28 0.31 0.04 -0.27 -86% 1,808 578 -1,230 -68% 0.21 2.52 2.47 -0.05 -2% 1,348 734 -614 -46% 0.40 2.29 2.91 0.62 27% 1,201 1,146 -55 -5% 0.34 0.08 0.01 -0.07 -92% 3,663 1,368 -2,295 -63% 0.13 0.03 0.01 -0.03 -80% 2,058 1,561 -498 -24% 0.08 0.26 0.23 -0.03 -12% 624 275 -349 -56% 0.08 0.19 0.26 0.07 38% 396 327 -69 -17% 0.08 0.45 0.43 -0.02 -5% 1,269 1,603 334 26% 0.28 0.43 0.42 0.00 -1% 1,238 973 -264 -21% 0.27 0.50 0.60 0.09 18% 3,661 3,146 -515 -14% 0.24 0.53 0.61 0.08 14% 2,776 2,802 26 1% 0.25 0.13 0.13 0.00 1% 399 418 19 5% 0.07 0.13 0.13 0.00 3% 285 397 113 40% 0.07 0.58 0.60 0.03 5% 4,264 3,435 -830 -19% 0.30 0.59 0.60 0.01 2% 3,903 3,298 -604 -15% 0.28 0.37 0.12 -0.24 -66% 1,035 530 -505 -49% 0.39 0.38 0.07 -0.30 -80% 929 373 -556 -60% 0.39 0.16 0.15 -0.02 -11% 2,891 2,193 -698 -24% 0.27 0.16 0.15 -0.02 -11% 2,559 2,185 -374 -15% 0.27 2 of 90 ------- 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 NOX 2012 vs 2011 2011 Heat 2012 Heat 2012 vs 2011 2012 vs 2011 Emission Rate Emission Rate NOX Emission Input Input Heat Input Heat Input (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) Rate (%) (mmBtu) (mmBtu) (mmBtu) (%) 0.28 0.02 7% 12,719,782 9,391,902 -3,327,879 -26% 0.20 -0.05 -21% 13,394,445 12,656,081 -738,363 -6% 0.18 -0.11 -36% 9,589,605 5,879,965 -3,709,640 -39% 0.16 -0.01 -6% 9,946,973 3,376,838 -6,570,135 -66% 0.41 0.07 20% 14,966,847 4,798,706 -10,168,141 -68% 0.37 0.04 11% 14,028,579 10,004,275 -4,024,304 -29% 0.27 -0.09 -24% 24,090,308 12,392,674 -11,697,634 -49% 0.24 -0.05 -17% 33,169,740 24,864,445 -8,305,295 -25% 0.12 -0.37 -76% 950,093 667,055 -283,038 -30% 0.12 -0.39 -76% 948,163 682,334 -265,830 -28% 0.16 -0.11 -41% 15,283,628 10,013,147 -5,270,481 -34% 0.26 0.05 24% 16,957,232 4,381,381 -12,575,851 -74% 0.34 -0.07 -16% 6,706,803 4,369,890 -2,336,913 -35% 0.41 0.06 19% 7,006,184 5,637,440 -1,368,744 -20% 0.08 -0.05 -38% 57,177,176 34,685,961 -22,491,215 -39% 0.07 -0.01 -13% 53,106,414 46,490,460 -6,615,953 -12% 0.06 -0.02 -25% 15,847,597 9,282,019 -6,565,578 -41% 0.07 -0.01 -14% 10,427,597 10,062,319 -365,278 -4% 0.28 0.01 3% 9,151,820 11,264,991 2,113,171 23% 0.27 0.01 2% 9,233,304 7,109,529 -2,123,775 -23% 0.19 -0.05 -22% 30,175,935 33,058,846 2,882,910 10% 0.18 -0.07 -26% 22,249,413 30,431,416 8,182,003 37% 0.07 0.00 1% 11,573,385 11,968,097 394,712 3% 0.06 0.00 -5% 8,754,265 12,871,529 4,117,264 47% 0.27 -0.03 -11% 28,399,937 25,726,678 -2,673,258 -9% 0.26 -0.02 -8% 27,450,436 25,143,966 -2,306,471 -8% 0.27 -0.12 -31% 5,272,806 3,898,352 -1,374,454 -26% 0.19 -0.20 -51% 4,725,091 3,840,145 -884,946 -19% 0.22 -0.05 -18% 21,041,215 19,546,818 -1,494,397 -7% 0.23 -0.04 -14% 19,185,945 19,027,207 -158,739 -1% 3 of 90 ------- 2011 vs 2012 S02 and NOx Comparisons, Quarterly Acid Rain Program and Clean Air Interstate Rule Emissions, Emission Rates, and Heat Input Changes at Facilities (Coal Units < 2011 data are final, 2012 are preliminary data submitted to EPA from sources as of August 1, 2012. EPA will update as it receives and verifies data 2011 S02 2012 S02 Emissions Emissions 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 Facility Name State County Quarter (tons) (tons) Emissions (tons) Emissions (%) Coronado Generating Station AZ Apache 1 3,175 798 -2,378 -75% Coronado Generating Station AZ Apache 2 1,403 16 -1,387 -99% Irvington Generating Station AZ Pima 1 424 76 -349 -82% Irvington Generating Station AZ Pima 2 554 5 -549 -99% Navajo Generating Station AZ Coconino 1 941 1,011 69 7% Navajo Generating Station AZ Coconino 2 1,184 1,002 -182 -15% Springerville Generating Station AZ Apache 1 2,338 1,567 -771 -33% Springerville Generating Station AZ Apache 2 1,907 1,430 -477 -25% Arapahoe CO Denver 1 434 598 164 38% Arapahoe CO Denver 2 350 464 115 33% Cherokee CO Adams 1 2,022 1,132 -890 -44% Cherokee CO Adams 2 1,819 665 -1,154 -63% Comanche (470) CO Pueblo 1 836 822 -14 -2% Comanche (470) CO Pueblo 2 599 797 199 33% Craig CO Moffat 1 1,034 976 -59 -6% Craig CO Moffat 2 757 808 51 7% Hayden CO Routt 1 633 530 -104 -16% Hayden CO Routt 2 252 274 21 8% Lamar CO Prowers 1 Lamar CO Prowers 2 Martin Drake CO El Paso 1 1,536 1,386 -150 -10% Martin Drake CO El Paso 2 1,299 854 -445 -34% Nucla CO Montrose 1 332 326 -6 -2% Nucla CO Montrose 2 328 323 -5 -1% Pawnee CO Morgan 1 3,421 3,353 -68 -2% Pawnee CO Morgan 2 1,568 3,017 1,449 92% Rawhide Energy Station CO Larimer 1 230 170 -59 -26% Rawhide Energy Station CO Larimer 2 219 216 -2 -1% Ray D Nixon CO El Paso 1 1,024 771 -253 -25% Ray D Nixon CO El Paso 2 1,003 931 -73 -7% 4 of 90 ------- 3nly) 2011 S02 2012 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2011 NOX Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emissions (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (%) (tons) 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 Emissions NOX Emissions (tons) (tons) 2011 NOX 2012 vs 2011 NOX Emission Rate Emissions (%) (lb/mmBtu) 0.39 0.11 -0.28 -72% 2,821 2,303 -519 -18% 0.35 0.24 0.00 -0.24 -98% 1,886 1,149 -737 -39% 0.33 0.66 0.10 -0.55 -84% 259 219 -40 -15% 0.40 0.72 0.01 -0.72 -99% 336 256 -80 -24% 0.44 0.05 0.05 0.00 -1% 4,535 4,214 -322 -7% 0.24 0.05 0.05 0.00 -7% 4,828 3,955 -873 -18% 0.21 0.17 0.12 -0.05 -28% 1,672 1,756 84 5% 0.12 0.15 0.12 -0.03 -21% 1,604 1,678 74 5% 0.13 0.41 0.46 0.05 13% 417 491 74 18% 0.39 0.44 0.44 0.00 1% 444 449 5 1% 0.56 0.33 0.25 -0.08 -23% 2,369 1,397 -972 -41% 0.38 0.33 0.20 -0.13 -40% 2,107 1,044 -1,063 -50% 0.38 0.07 0.07 0.00 0% 1,186 1,289 103 9% 0.10 0.07 0.06 -0.01 -15% 732 1,301 569 78% 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.00 -2% 3,481 3,302 -179 -5% 0.29 0.08 0.07 0.00 -5% 2,741 3,053 313 11% 0.28 0.13 0.13 0.00 4% 1,871 1,449 -422 -23% 0.38 0.13 0.13 0.01 6% 886 683 -203 -23% 0.44 0.65 0.67 0.02 2% 825 712 -114 -14% 0.35 0.59 0.54 -0.04 -8% 740 501 -239 -32% 0.33 0.32 0.31 -0.01 -2% 384 339 -45 -12% 0.37 0.31 0.32 0.01 3% 367 291 -76 -21% 0.35 0.84 0.74 -0.10 -11% 914 948 34 4% 0.22 0.81 0.79 -0.02 -2% 437 751 314 72% 0.23 0.08 0.09 0.00 5% 498 295 -203 -41% 0.18 0.08 0.08 0.00 -1% 447 341 -106 -24% 0.16 0.51 0.44 -0.07 -14% 513 432 -82 -16% 0.26 0.46 0.46 0.00 0% 500 455 -45 -9% 0.23 5 of 90 ------- 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 NOX 2012 vs 2011 2011 Heat 2012 Heat 2012 vs 2011 2012 vs 2011 Emission Rate Emission Rate NOX Emission Input Input Heat Input Heat Input (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) Rate (%) (mmBtu) (mmBtu) (mmBtu) (%) 0.32 -0.03 -9% 16,271,265 14,601,396 -1,669,869 -10% 0.30 -0.03 -10% 11,465,178 7,731,128 -3,734,050 -33% 0.30 -0.10 -26% 1,293,457 1,469,666 176,209 14% 0.29 -0.15 -35% 1,533,144 1,797,373 264,229 17% 0.21 -0.03 -14% 37,266,954 40,384,486 3,117,532 8% 0.19 -0.02 -10% 45,218,957 41,112,803 -4,106,154 -9% 0.13 0.01 12% 28,030,287 26,278,045 -1,752,243 -6% 0.14 0.01 11% 25,224,988 23,840,703 -1,384,284 -5% 0.38 -0.01 -3% 2,114,629 2,573,197 458,567 22% 0.43 -0.13 -23% 1,595,202 2,104,165 508,964 32% 0.31 -0.07 -19% 12,336,843 8,972,568 -3,364,276 -27% 0.31 -0.07 -19% 11,153,327 6,788,277 -4,365,050 -39% 0.11 0.01 10% 23,605,751 23,221,943 -383,808 -2% 0.10 0.01 13% 15,980,912 25,142,352 9,161,440 57% 0.29 0.00 -1% 24,061,762 23,108,016 -953,746 -4% 0.28 0.00 -1% 19,328,439 21,783,903 2,455,464 13% 0.36 -0.02 -4% 9,912,327 8,007,777 -1,904,550 -19% 0.33 -0.11 -25% 4,022,827 4,117,212 94,384 2% 0.34 -0.01 -2% 4,721,431 4,160,726 -560,705 -12% 0.32 -0.02 -5% 4,431,825 3,150,753 -1,281,072 -29% 0.33 -0.04 -12% 2,072,584 2,079,228 6,643 0% 0.29 -0.06 -17% 2,113,464 2,024,778 -88,687 -4% 0.21 -0.01 -6% 8,134,029 9,007,394 873,364 11% 0.20 -0.03 -13% 3,862,901 7,610,697 3,747,796 97% 0.15 -0.03 -16% 5,664,355 3,989,578 -1,674,777 -30% 0.13 -0.04 -23% 5,433,362 5,406,622 -26,740 0% 0.25 -0.01 -4% 3,985,885 3,487,637 -498,248 -13% 0.23 -0.01 -2% 4,319,085 4,021,758 -297,327 -7% 6 of 90 ------- 2011 vs 2012 S02 and NOx Comparisons, Quarterly Acid Rain Program and Clean Air Interstate Rule Emissions, Emission Rates, and Heat Input Changes at Facilities (Coal Units < 2011 data are final, 2012 are preliminary data submitted to EPA from sources as of August 1, 2012. EPA will update as it receives and verifies data 2011 S02 2012 S02 Emissions Emissions 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 Facility Name State County Quarter (tons) (tons) Emissions (tons) Emissions (%) Valmont CO Boulder 1 253 163 -90 -36% Valmont CO Boulder 2 343 210 -132 -39% Bridgeport Harbor Station CT Fairfield 1 202 33 -169 -84% Bridgeport Harbor Station CT Fairfield 2 66 33 -32 -49% Edge Moor DE New Castle 1 1 8 7 615% Edge Moor DE New Castle 2 5 Indian River DE Sussex 1 2,392 656 -1,736 -73% Indian River DE Sussex 2 2,917 490 -2,427 -83% Big Bend FL Hillsborough 1 2,332 2,478 146 6% Big Bend FL Hillsborough 2 2,374 1,856 -519 -22% C D Mcintosh Jr Power Plant FL Polk 1 658 1,174 516 78% C D Mcintosh Jr Power Plant FL Polk 2 1,337 903 -434 -32% Cedar Bay Generating Co. LP FL Duval 1 290 110 -180 -62% Cedar Bay Generating Co. LP FL Duval 2 435 220 -215 -49% Central Power & Lime FL Hernando 1 Central Power & Lime FL Hernando 2 112 Crist Electric Generating Plant FL Escambia 1 709 50 -659 -93% Crist Electric Generating Plant FL Escambia 2 705 Crystal River FL Citrus 1 2,458 4,270 1,812 74% Crystal River FL Citrus 2 9,762 8,623 -1,139 -12% Curtis H. Stanton Energy Center FL Orange 1 530 260 -270 -51% Curtis H. Stanton Energy Center FL Orange 2 597 Deerhaven FL Alachua 1 968 241 -726 -75% Deerhaven FL Alachua 2 349 248 -101 -29% Indiantown Cogeneration, LP FL Martin 1 403 521 118 29% Indiantown Cogeneration, LP FL Martin 2 516 464 -52 -10% Lansing Smith Generating Plant FL Bay 1 1,574 969 -605 -38% Lansing Smith Generating Plant FL Bay 2 1,603 1,388 -215 -13% Northside FL Duval 1 575 390 -185 -32% Northside FL Duval 2 316 5 -311 -99% 7 of 90 ------- 3nly) 2011 S02 2012 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2011 NOX Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emissions (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (%) (tons) 2012 NOX Emissions (tons) 2012 vs 2011 NOX Emissions (tons) 2011 NOX 2012 vs 2011 NOX Emission Rate Emissions (%) (lb/mmBtu) 0.22 0.12 -0.10 -45% 420 457 37 9% 0.36 0.18 0.13 -0.06 -31% 669 486 -182 -27% 0.36 0.18 0.19 0.01 6% 155 22 -133 -86% 0.14 0.20 0.21 0.01 4% 47 24 -22 -48% 0.14 0.00 0.01 0.01 299% 49 80 31 63% 0.08 0.01 68 0.07 1.13 0.88 -0.25 -22% 643 122 -521 -81% 0.30 1.13 1.42 0.30 26% 782 80 -702 -90% 0.30 0.19 0.16 -0.03 -17% 1,062 1,370 308 29% 0.09 0.16 0.17 0.02 11% 1,267 933 -334 -26% 0.08 0.48 0.65 0.17 36% 266 366 100 38% 0.19 0.45 0.62 0.17 37% 425 340 -85 -20% 0.14 0.15 0.12 -0.03 -22% 320 156 -164 -51% 0.16 0.15 0.13 -0.02 -11% 479 272 -207 -43% 0.16 0.69 48 0.30 0.14 0.01 -0.12 -90% 1,111 513 -598 -54% 0.21 0.11 1,136 0.17 0.18 0.36 0.18 95% 805 1,483 678 84% 0.06 0.59 0.52 -0.06 -11% 2,467 2,552 85 3% 0.15 0.10 0.11 0.01 8% 1,052 379 -673 -64% 0.20 0.09 1,367 0.21 0.55 0.19 -0.37 -66% 87 71 -16 -18% 0.05 0.26 0.20 -0.06 -23% 91 64 -27 -30% 0.07 0.27 0.32 0.05 20% 288 369 81 28% 0.19 0.22 0.27 0.05 22% 413 361 -52 -13% 0.18 0.84 1.16 0.32 38% 530 284 -246 -46% 0.28 0.93 1.18 0.25 27% 538 450 -88 -16% 0.31 0.16 0.16 0.00 1% 236 114 -122 -52% 0.06 0.15 0.10 -0.06 -37% 94 7 -87 -93% 0.05 8 of 90 ------- 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 NOX 2012 vs 2011 Emission Rate Emission Rate NOX Emission (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) Rate (%) 2011 Heat Input (mmBtu) 2012 Heat Input (mmBtu) 2012 vs 2011 2012 vs 2011 Heat Input Heat Input (mmBtu) (%) 0.34 -0.02 -6% 2,329,292 2,701,409 372,117 16% 0.29 -0.07 -19% 3,711,702 3,315,208 -396,494 -11% 0.13 -0.01 -6% 2,219,687 340,675 -1,879,013 -85% 0.15 0.01 7% 649,912 314,677 -335,234 -52% 0.08 -0.01 -9% 1,154,514 2,068,670 914,155 79% 1,911,544 0.16 -0.14 -46% 4,225,763 1,491,868 -2,733,896 -65% 0.23 -0.07 -23% 5,179,219 688,267 -4,490,952 -87% 0.09 0.00 1% 24,964,746 31,931,372 6,966,625 28% 0.09 0.00 5% 30,366,373 21,331,517 -9,034,857 -30% 0.20 0.01 4% 2,753,656 3,626,386 872,730 32% 0.23 0.09 63% 5,945,518 2,926,896 -3,018,622 -51% 0.17 0.00 0% 3,886,617 1,887,493 -1,999,124 -51% 0.16 0.00 0% 5,871,303 3,324,748 -2,546,555 -43% 322,912 0.13 -0.08 -37% 10,471,875 7,714,222 -2,757,653 -26% 13,179,686 0.12 0.06 107% 26,744,882 23,796,465 -2,948,416 -11% 0.16 0.01 4% 33,184,677 32,901,550 -283,127 -1% 0.16 -0.04 -21% 10,403,307 4,736,144 -5,667,163 -54% 12,851,079 0.06 0.01 11% 3,496,108 2,574,537 -921,571 -26% 0.05 -0.02 -24% 2,694,115 2,476,405 -217,711 -8% 0.23 0.04 19% 2,989,479 3,224,540 235,062 8% 0.21 0.03 18% 4,594,428 3,388,620 -1,205,808 -26% 0.34 0.06 20% 3,757,919 1,676,308 -2,081,611 -55% 0.38 0.07 22% 3,435,163 2,349,641 -1,085,522 -32% 0.05 -0.02 -29% 7,410,736 4,998,617 -2,412,119 -33% 0.15 0.10 224% 4,098,779 94,655 -4,004,124 -98% 9 of 90 ------- 2011 vs 2012 S02 and NOx Comparisons, Quarterly Acid Rain Program and Clean Air Interstate Rule Emissions, Emission Rates, and Heat Input Changes at Facilities (Coal Units < 2011 data are final, 2012 are preliminary data submitted to EPA from sources as of August 1, 2012. EPA will update as it receives and verifies data 2011 S02 2012 S02 Emissions Emissions 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 Facility Name State County Quarter (tons) (tons) Emissions (tons) Emissions (%) Polk FL Polk 1 286 89 -196 -69% Polk FL Polk 2 123 177 54 44% Scholz Electric Generating Plant FL Jackson 1 78 Scholz Electric Generating Plant FL Jackson 2 150 0 -150 -100% Seminole (136) FL Putnam 1 4,403 2,746 -1,658 -38% Seminole (136) FL Putnam 2 3,812 3,371 -441 -12% St. Johns River Power FL Duval 1 2,523 1,969 -554 -22% St. Johns River Power FL Duval 2 3,146 3,280 134 4% Bowen GA Bartow 1 2,266 601 -1,665 -73% Bowen GA Bartow 2 1,040 528 -512 -49% Hammond GA Floyd 1 302 745 443 147% Hammond GA Floyd 2 347 Harllee Branch GA Putnam 1 12,551 3,445 -9,106 -73% Harllee Branch GA Putnam 2 17,137 6,127 -11,011 -64% Jack McDonough GA Cobb 1 4,375 398 -3,977 -91% Jack McDonough GA Cobb 2 4,886 Kraft GA Chatham 1 2,304 231 -2,073 -90% Kraft GA Chatham 2 30 27 -3 -9% Mcintosh (6124) GA Effingham 1 102 Mcintosh (6124) GA Effingham 2 390 Mitchell (GA) GA Dougherty 1 81 Mitchell (GA) GA Dougherty 2 196 39 -157 -80% Scherer GA Monroe 1 13,257 9,495 -3,762 -28% Scherer GA Monroe 2 12,916 9,158 -3,758 -29% Wansley (6052) GA Heard 1 633 424 -209 -33% Wansley (6052) GA Heard 2 1,006 619 -388 -39% Yates GA Coweta 1 10,632 8,317 -2,315 -22% Yates GA Coweta 2 11,900 5,807 -6,093 -51% Ames IA Story 1 219 188 -31 -14% Ames IA Story 2 178 178 0 0% 10 of 90 ------- 3nly) 2011 S02 2012 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2011 NOX 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 2011 NOX Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emissions Emissions NOX Emissions 2012 vs 2011 NOX Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (%) (tons) (tons) (tons) Emissions (%) (lb/mmBtu) 0.19 0.17 -0.02 -11% 90 35 -55 -61% 0.06 0.18 0.19 0.00 2% 42 61 19 45% 0.06 1.37 33 0.57 1.47 1.59 0.12 8% 60 0 -60 -100% 0.58 0.36 0.34 -0.02 -6% 677 371 -306 -45% 0.06 0.36 0.38 0.02 6% 531 463 -68 -13% 0.05 0.29 0.43 0.14 46% 1,362 1,963 601 44% 0.16 0.30 0.38 0.07 24% 1,572 3,434 1,861 118% 0.15 0.10 0.05 -0.05 -52% 1,643 1,497 -146 -9% 0.07 0.05 0.05 0.00 4% 2,004 890 -1,114 -56% 0.09 0.07 0.27 0.20 283% 711 544 -168 -24% 0.17 0.08 771 0.18 1.91 1.68 -0.23 -12% 2,620 884 -1,736 -66% 0.40 1.93 1.87 -0.06 -3% 3,874 1,380 -2,494 -64% 0.44 1.62 1.48 -0.14 -8% 1,017 63 -955 -94% 0.38 1.63 788 0.26 1.80 0.43 -1.37 -76% 831 189 -642 -77% 0.65 0.06 0.05 -0.01 -14% 129 138 10 7% 0.24 1.52 55 0.81 1.62 142 0.59 1.41 33 0.58 1.44 2.24 0.80 55% 80 10 -70 -87% 0.59 0.48 0.44 -0.04 -8% 4,000 3,769 -231 -6% 0.15 0.40 0.41 0.00 1% 3,834 2,726 -1,108 -29% 0.12 0.07 0.07 0.01 8% 736 522 -214 -29% 0.08 0.07 0.08 0.00 3% 851 497 -354 -42% 0.06 1.99 2.23 0.24 12% 2,080 1,259 -821 -39% 0.39 1.86 2.03 0.17 9% 1,627 753 -874 -54% 0.25 0.38 0.38 0.00 0% 196 143 -54 -27% 0.34 0.37 0.36 -0.01 -3% 165 160 -5 -3% 0.34 11 of 90 ------- 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 NOX 2012 vs 2011 2011 Heat 2012 Heat 2012 vs 2011 2012 vs 2011 Emission Rate Emission Rate NOX Emission Input Input Heat Input Heat Input (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) Rate (%) (mmBtu) (mmBtu) (mmBtu) (%) 0.07 0.01 11% 3,028,044 1,070,891 -1,957,153 -65% 0.06 0.00 3% 1,359,109 114,763 1,914,873 555,764 41% 0.22 -0.36 -62% 204,886 286 -204,600 -100% 0.05 -0.01 -17% 24,456,285 16,207,766 -8,248,520 -34% 0.05 0.00 5% 21,425,375 17,827,057 -3,598,319 -17% 0.43 0.27 170% 17,168,649 9,156,290 -8,012,358 -47% 0.39 0.24 160% 20,680,531 17,388,519 -3,292,012 -16% 0.12 0.05 65% 44,118,845 24,314,792 -19,804,053 -45% 0.08 -0.01 -9% 45,895,346 22,373,004 -23,522,342 -51% 0.20 0.03 19% 8,467,751 8,573,308 5,460,032 -3,007,719 -36% 0.43 0.03 8% 13,142,410 4,095,473 -9,046,936 -69% 0.42 -0.02 -4% 17,757,574 6,555,622 -11,201,953 -63% 0.23 -0.14 -38% 5,402,905 5,986,597 537,258 -4,865,648 -90% 0.35 -0.30 -46% 2,556,125 1,076,402 -1,479,723 -58% 0.25 0.01 2% 1,064,862 133,946 481,004 113,992 1,120,689 55,827 5% 0.58 0.00 -1% 272,403 34,974 -237,429 -87% 0.18 0.03 21% 55,041,188 43,034,356 -12,006,832 -22% 0.12 0.00 1% 63,821,083 44,782,886 -19,038,197 -30% 0.09 0.01 15% 18,989,078 11,749,110 -7,239,969 -38% 0.06 0.00 -2% 27,676,828 16,450,817 -11,226,011 -41% 0.34 -0.05 -13% 10,664,667 7,453,327 -3,211,339 -30% 0.26 0.01 4% 12,793,218 5,708,609 -7,084,609 -55% 0.29 -0.05 -16% 1,162,500 998,510 -163,990 -14% 0.32 -0.02 -6% 969,708 997,152 27,444 3% 12 of 90 ------- 2011 vs 2012 S02 and NOx Comparisons, Quarterly Acid Rain Program and Clean Air Interstate Rule Emissions, Emission Rates, and Heat Input Changes at Facilities (Coal Units < 2011 data are final, 2012 are preliminary data submitted to EPA from sources as of August 1, 2012. EPA will update as it receives and verifies data 2011 S02 2012 S02 Emissions Emissions 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 Facility Name State County Quarter (tons) (tons) Emissions (tons) Emissions (%) Burlington (IA) IA Des Moines 1 1,206 737 -469 -39% Burlington (IA) IA Des Moines 2 875 1,065 190 22% Dubuque IA Dubuque 1 284 0 -284 -100% Dubuque IA Dubuque 2 85 1 -85 -99% Earl F Wisdom IA Clay 1 9 4 -5 -59% Earl F Wisdom IA Clay 2 17 5 -11 -68% Fair Station IA Muscatine 1 2,014 Fair Station IA Muscatine 2 303 169 -135 -44% George Neal North IA Woodbury 1 4,064 2,645 -1,419 -35% George Neal North IA Woodbury 2 3,276 1,814 -1,462 -45% George Neal South IA Woodbury 1 4,184 3,841 -343 -8% George Neal South IA Woodbury 2 3,476 3,102 -374 -11% Lansing IA Allamakee 1 1,663 968 -695 -42% Lansing IA Allamakee 2 622 952 330 53% Louisa IA Louisa 1 406 2,040 1,633 402% Louisa IA Louisa 2 2,255 2,234 -21 -1% Milton L Kapp IA Clinton 1 723 402 -321 -44% Milton L Kapp IA Clinton 2 1,105 733 -372 -34% Muscatine IA Muscatine 1 634 519 -115 -18% Muscatine IA Muscatine 2 366 341 -25 -7% Ottumwa IA Wapello 1 3,445 3,495 50 1% Ottumwa IA Wapello 2 2,881 1,178 -1,704 -59% Pella IA Marion 1 33 93 60 183% Pella IA Marion 2 36 16 -20 -56% Prairie Creek IA Linn 1 993 592 -401 -40% Prairie Creek IA Linn 2 533 483 -51 -9% Riverside (1081) IA Scott 1 846 681 -165 -19% Riverside (1081) IA Scott 2 786 469 -317 -40% Streeter Station IA Black Hawk 1 20 1 -18 -93% Streeter Station IA Black Hawk 2 13 10 -3 -23% 13 of 90 ------- 3nly) 2011 S02 2012 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2011 NOX 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 2011 NOX Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emissions Emissions NOX Emissions 2012 vs 2011 NOX Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (%) (tons) (tons) (tons) Emissions (%) (lb/mmBtu) 0.62 0.64 0.02 3% 255 170 -85 -33% 0.13 0.60 0.67 0.08 13% 204 241 37 18% 0.14 0.67 0.00 -0.67 -100% 285 2 -283 -99% 0.67 0.63 0.00 -0.63 -100% 90 73 -18 -20% 0.67 2.30 1.61 -0.69 -30% 2 1 -1 -33% 0.56 2.09 1.93 -0.16 -8% 5 1 -3 -69% 0.59 4.72 179 0.42 4.94 1.83 -3.11 -63% 25 43 19 75% 0.40 0.48 0.45 -0.04 -8% 2,215 1,469 -746 -34% 0.26 0.50 0.46 -0.04 -9% 1,563 1,065 -497 -32% 0.24 0.74 0.65 -0.09 -12% 1,269 1,311 42 3% 0.22 0.75 0.60 -0.15 -20% 905 1,046 141 16% 0.19 0.67 0.63 -0.04 -6% 203 242 39 19% 0.08 0.65 0.69 0.04 6% 115 181 66 58% 0.12 0.33 0.34 0.01 4% 223 1,089 866 389% 0.18 0.34 0.35 0.01 4% 1,175 1,107 -68 -6% 0.18 0.74 0.68 -0.07 -9% 115 78 -37 -32% 0.12 0.68 0.68 -0.01 -1% 237 138 -99 -42% 0.15 0.34 0.40 0.07 19% 841 604 -237 -28% 0.45 0.36 0.31 -0.05 -15% 505 429 -76 -15% 0.50 0.56 0.69 0.13 22% 866 753 -113 -13% 0.14 0.55 0.67 0.12 21% 676 217 -459 -68% 0.13 0.54 0.67 0.12 23% 25 61 36 141% 0.42 0.49 0.70 0.21 42% 32 11 -22 -68% 0.45 0.65 0.61 -0.04 -6% 593 309 -284 -48% 0.39 0.62 0.65 0.03 4% 315 249 -67 -21% 0.37 0.75 0.74 -0.01 -2% 233 192 -41 -18% 0.21 0.75 0.72 -0.03 -4% 216 154 -62 -29% 0.21 0.79 0.78 -0.02 -2% 16 1 -15 -95% 0.64 0.81 0.68 -0.12 -15% 10 8 -3 -25% 0.66 14 of 90 ------- 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 NOX 2012 vs 2011 Emission Rate Emission Rate NOX Emission (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) Rate (%) 2011 Heat Input (mmBtu) 2012 Heat Input (mmBtu) 2012 vs 2011 Heat Input (mmBtu) 2012 vs 2011 Heat Input (%) 0.15 0.02 12% 3,891,232 2,309,902 -1,581,330 -41% 0.15 0.01 9% 2,919,977 3,155,714 235,737 8% 0.20 -0.47 -70% 848,653 20,833 -827,821 -98% 0.18 -0.49 -73% 270,174 800,066 529,893 196% 0.65 0.09 16% 7,978 4,631 -3,347 -42% 0.52 -0.08 -13% 16,170 5,669 -10,501 -65% 853,768 0.47 0.07 17% 122,765 184,382 61,617 50% 0.25 -0.02 -6% 16,773,533 11,863,242 -4,910,291 -29% 0.27 0.03 12% 13,104,622 7,968,142 -5,136,480 -39% 0.22 0.00 -1% 11,376,231 11,850,472 474,241 4% 0.20 0.01 4% 9,296,455 10,371,714 1,075,260 12% 0.16 0.08 93% 4,947,461 3,054,711 -1,892,750 -38% 0.13 0.01 9% 1,901,682 2,752,278 850,596 45% 0.18 0.00 1% 2,460,412 11,890,859 9,430,447 383% 0.17 0.00 -1% 13,401,947 12,734,854 -667,093 -5% 0.13 0.01 11% 1,942,308 1,188,090 -754,218 -39% 0.13 -0.02 -13% 3,232,050 2,159,581 -1,072,469 -33% 0.47 0.02 5% 3,747,527 2,569,880 -1,177,648 -31% 0.39 -0.11 -22% 2,023,097 2,214,649 191,552 9% 0.15 0.01 5% 12,282,649 10,183,630 -2,099,018 -17% 0.12 -0.01 -5% 10,391,375 3,496,257 -6,895,118 -66% 0.44 0.02 5% 120,953 277,916 156,963 130% 0.47 0.02 5% 144,492 44,361 -100,131 -69% 0.32 -0.07 -18% 3,076,041 1,942,995 -1,133,046 -37% 0.33 -0.03 -9% 1,724,981 1,495,313 -229,668 -13% 0.21 0.00 0% 2,251,515 1,849,036 -402,479 -18% 0.24 0.03 15% 2,097,084 1,300,646 -796,438 -38% 0.44 -0.20 -32% 49,400 3,308 -46,092 -93% 0.54 -0.12 -18% 31,175 28,511 -2,663 -9% 15 of 90 ------- 2011 vs 2012 S02 and NOx Comparisons, Quarterly Acid Rain Program and Clean Air Interstate Rule Emissions, Emission Rates, and Heat Input Changes at Facilities (Coal Units < 2011 data are final, 2012 are preliminary data submitted to EPA from sources as of August 1, 2012. EPA will update as it receives and verifies data 2011 S02 2012 S02 Emissions Emissions 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 Facility Name State County Quarter (tons) (tons) Emissions (tons) Emissions (%) Sutherland IA Marshall 1 2,003 1,453 -551 -27% Sutherland IA Marshall 2 632 314 -318 -50% Walter Scott Jr. Energy Center IA Pottawattamie 1 3,592 3,499 -94 -3% Walter Scott Jr. Energy Center IA Pottawattamie 2 3,763 3,301 -463 -12% Baldwin Energy Complex IL Randolph 1 4,148 2,968 -1,181 -28% Baldwin Energy Complex IL Randolph 2 4,735 2,918 -1,817 -38% Coffeen IL Montgomery 1 25 18 -7 -27% Coffeen IL Montgomery 2 19 21 2 12% Crawford IL Cook 1 1,721 1,136 -585 -34% Crawford IL Cook 2 1,418 1,304 -113 -8% Dallman IL Sangamon 1 802 296 -506 -63% Dallman IL Sangamon 2 802 274 -528 -66% Duck Creek IL Fulton 1 27 123 97 362% Duck Creek IL Fulton 2 27 76 49 183% E D Edwards IL Peoria 1 3,396 2,621 -775 -23% E D Edwards IL Peoria 2 2,744 2,899 155 6% Fisk IL Cook 1 1,065 779 -285 -27% Fisk IL Cook 2 977 828 -150 -15% Havana IL Mason 1 2,241 1,596 -645 -29% Havana IL Mason 2 1,690 1,217 -473 -28% Hennepin Power Station IL Putnam 1 1,507 1,465 -43 -3% Hennepin Power Station IL Putnam 2 1,611 1,553 -58 -4% Hutsonville IL Crawford 1 3,441 Hutsonville IL Crawford 2 2,004 Joliet 29 IL Will 1 3,390 2,189 -1,201 -35% Joliet 29 IL Will 2 2,319 2,492 172 7% Joliet 9 IL Will 1 1,157 611 -546 -47% Joliet 9 IL Will 2 1,150 182 -968 -84% Joppa Steam IL Massac 1 6,903 4,743 -2,160 -31% Joppa Steam IL Massac 2 5,834 3,842 -1,992 -34% 16 of 90 ------- 3nly) 2011 S02 2012 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2011 NOX 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 2011 NOX Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emissions Emissions NOX Emissions 2012 vs 2011 NOX Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (%) (tons) (tons) (tons) Emissions (%) (lb/mmBtu) 1.59 1.67 0.09 5% 443 277 -167 -38% 0.35 1.75 1.20 -0.54 -31% 116 81 -35 -30% 0.32 0.24 0.25 0.01 5% 1,904 1,948 44 2% 0.13 0.25 0.25 0.00 0% 1,995 1,796 -199 -10% 0.13 0.25 0.17 -0.08 -33% 1,115 1,398 284 25% 0.07 0.26 0.17 -0.09 -36% 1,149 1,362 213 19% 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 -39% 309 386 77 25% 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 -20% 251 558 308 123% 0.05 0.45 0.41 -0.04 -9% 449 280 -169 -38% 0.12 0.43 0.50 0.07 16% 424 256 -168 -40% 0.13 0.20 0.12 -0.08 -42% 272 161 -111 -41% 0.07 0.28 0.10 -0.18 -65% 247 174 -74 -30% 0.09 0.01 0.04 0.03 267% 308 275 -33 -11% 0.12 0.01 0.02 0.01 127% 258 293 35 14% 0.10 0.46 0.45 0.00 -1% 962 884 -78 -8% 0.13 0.45 0.55 0.10 23% 835 834 -2 0% 0.14 0.48 0.46 -0.02 -5% 246 197 -49 -20% 0.11 0.45 0.44 -0.01 -2% 285 235 -50 -17% 0.13 0.42 0.35 -0.08 -18% 188 351 163 87% 0.04 0.41 0.41 0.01 2% 276 216 -60 -22% 0.07 0.47 0.51 0.05 10% 394 379 -14 -4% 0.12 0.50 0.52 0.02 3% 398 431 33 8% 0.12 2.34 386 0.26 1.89 264 0.25 0.43 0.40 -0.03 -7% 859 559 -300 -35% 0.11 0.41 0.39 -0.02 -4% 664 652 -12 -2% 0.12 0.41 0.42 0.01 1% 898 219 -679 -76% 0.32 0.43 0.45 0.03 6% 893 75 -818 -92% 0.33 0.65 0.51 -0.14 -22% 1,187 1,069 -119 -10% 0.11 0.61 0.46 -0.16 -26% 1,080 962 -119 -11% 0.11 17 of 90 ------- 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 NOX 2012 vs 2011 2011 Heat 2012 Heat 2012 vs 2011 2012 vs 2011 Emission Rate Emission Rate NOX Emission Input Input Heat Input Heat Input (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) Rate (%) (mmBtu) (mmBtu) (mmBtu) (%) 0.32 -0.03 -9% 2,526,552 1,737,703 -788,849 -31% 0.31 -0.01 -4% 724,417 522,796 -201,621 -28% 0.14 0.01 10% 30,035,661 27,834,721 -2,200,941 -7% 0.14 0.00 2% 29,926,618 26,321,721 -3,604,897 -12% 0.08 0.01 17% 33,306,669 35,785,549 2,478,880 7% 0.08 0.01 23% 36,196,864 34,813,274 -1,383,590 -4% 0.06 0.00 4% 10,163,679 12,204,296 2,040,617 20% 0.07 0.03 59% 11,069,520 15,543,817 4,474,297 40% 0.10 -0.02 -14% 7,722,956 5,571,440 -2,151,516 -28% 0.10 -0.03 -24% 6,574,074 5,221,796 -1,352,277 -21% 0.06 0.00 -7% 7,976,603 5,054,694 -2,921,909 -37% 0.06 -0.02 -28% 5,649,409 5,504,407 -145,002 -3% 0.08 -0.03 -29% 5,159,545 6,486,960 1,327,416 26% 0.09 -0.01 -9% 5,054,850 6,295,109 1,240,260 25% 0.15 0.02 18% 14,919,261 11,604,538 -3,314,723 -22% 0.16 0.02 16% 12,333,223 10,585,050 -1,748,173 -14% 0.12 0.01 5% 4,422,713 3,391,217 -1,031,496 -23% 0.13 -0.01 -4% 4,349,800 3,757,793 -592,007 -14% 0.08 0.04 115% 10,609,763 9,224,138 -1,385,625 -13% 0.07 0.01 11% 8,338,289 5,878,380 -2,459,909 -30% 0.13 0.01 9% 6,463,519 5,726,354 -737,166 -11% 0.14 0.02 16% 6,409,812 2,941,675 2,116,815 5,996,176 -413,636 -6% 0.10 -0.01 -7% 15,649,341 10,900,283 -4,749,058 -30% 0.10 -0.01 -13% 11,369,301 12,770,399 1,401,098 12% 0.15 -0.17 -53% 5,599,649 2,917,126 -2,682,523 -48% 0.19 -0.14 -44% 5,409,827 806,496 -4,603,330 -85% 0.11 0.00 2% 21,257,013 18,776,484 -2,480,529 -12% 0.11 0.00 0% 18,998,123 16,830,211 -2,167,912 -11% 18 of 90 ------- 2011 vs 2012 S02 and NOx Comparisons, Quarterly Acid Rain Program and Clean Air Interstate Rule Emissions, Emission Rates, and Heat Input Changes at Facilities (Coal Units < 2011 data are final, 2012 are preliminary data submitted to EPA from sources as of August 1, 2012. EPA will update as it receives and verifies data 2011 S02 2012 S02 Emissions Emissions 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 Facility Name State County Quarter (tons) (tons) Emissions (tons) Emissions (%) Kincaid Station IL Christian 1 3,109 3,042 -67 -2% Kincaid Station IL Christian 2 3,300 2,133 -1,167 -35% Marion IL Williamson 1 2,206 1,398 -808 -37% Marion IL Williamson 2 1,861 1,155 -706 -38% Meredosia IL Morgan 1 549 Meredosia IL Morgan 2 607 Newton IL Jasper 1 5,584 4,085 -1,499 -27% Newton IL Jasper 2 5,077 3,038 -2,039 -40% Powerton IL Tazewell 1 5,757 4,948 -809 -14% Powerton IL Tazewell 2 4,201 6,447 2,245 53% Prairie State Generating Company IL Washington 1 559 Prairie State Generating Company IL Washington 2 339 Vermilion Power Station IL Vermilion 1 527 Waukegan IL Lake 1 2,709 1,888 -821 -30% Waukegan IL Lake 2 2,147 1,332 -815 -38% Will County IL Will 1 1,954 1,520 -433 -22% Will County IL Will 2 1,602 2,179 577 36% Wood River Power Station IL Madison 1 2,353 2,180 -173 -7% Wood River Power Station IL Madison 2 2,156 878 -1,278 -59% A B Brown Generating Station IN Posey 1 2,027 1,260 -767 -38% A B Brown Generating Station IN Posey 2 1,589 1,363 -225 -14% Alcoa Allowance Management Inc IN Warrick 1 1,270 1,256 -14 -1% Alcoa Allowance Management Inc IN Warrick 2 865 1,033 168 19% Bailly Generating Station IN Porter 1 709 343 -366 -52% Bailly Generating Station IN Porter 2 400 509 109 27% Cayuga IN Vermillion 1 640 816 176 27% Cayuga IN Vermillion 2 770 1,020 250 32% Clifty Creek IN Jefferson 1 19,710 14,380 -5,330 -27% Clifty Creek IN Jefferson 2 20,024 12,193 -7,831 -39% Dean H Mitchell Generating Station IN Lake 1 19 of 90 ------- 3nly) 2011 S02 2012 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2011 NOX Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emissions (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (%) (tons) 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 Emissions NOX Emissions (tons) (tons) 2011 NOX 2012 vs 2011 NOX Emission Rate Emissions (%) (lb/mmBtu) 0.47 0.43 -0.04 -8% 4,583 3,317 -1,266 -28% 0.69 0.42 0.41 -0.01 -2% 2,657 2,180 -476 -18% 0.34 0.70 0.46 -0.24 -35% 607 460 -146 -24% 0.19 0.70 0.43 -0.26 -38% 337 457 121 36% 0.13 0.41 239 0.18 0.45 308 0.23 0.56 0.58 0.01 3% 972 758 -214 -22% 0.10 0.53 0.57 0.04 7% 946 574 -372 -39% 0.10 0.39 0.51 0.12 30% 3,701 988 -2,713 -73% 0.25 0.39 0.56 0.17 43% 2,608 1,072 -1,537 -59% 0.24 0.27 220 0.09 224 0.56 241 0.25 0.49 0.41 -0.08 -16% 596 535 -61 -10% 0.11 0.45 0.41 -0.04 -9% 583 351 -232 -40% 0.12 0.45 0.42 -0.03 -6% 580 258 -322 -56% 0.13 0.45 0.47 0.02 4% 480 367 -113 -24% 0.13 0.48 0.50 0.02 4% 704 632 -72 -10% 0.14 0.49 0.46 -0.04 -7% 621 252 -369 -59% 0.14 0.56 0.52 -0.04 -7% 409 391 -18 -4% 0.11 0.47 0.46 0.00 0% 542 460 -81 -15% 0.16 0.15 0.16 0.01 5% 2,785 2,936 150 5% 0.33 0.12 0.15 0.03 26% 2,726 2,102 -624 -23% 0.37 0.19 0.14 -0.05 -26% 556 301 -255 -46% 0.15 0.18 0.15 -0.03 -19% 290 421 131 45% 0.13 0.08 0.16 0.08 108% 2,297 1,496 -801 -35% 0.28 0.11 0.13 0.02 20% 1,914 2,336 422 22% 0.28 1.93 1.84 -0.08 -4% 2,850 4,085 1,235 43% 0.28 2.13 1.74 -0.40 -19% 2,714 2,898 184 7% 0.29 20 of 90 ------- 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 NOX 2012 vs 2011 2011 Heat 2012 Heat 2012 vs 2011 2012 vs 2011 Emission Rate Emission Rate NOX Emission Input Input Heat Input Heat Input (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) Rate (%) (mmBtu) (mmBtu) (mmBtu) (%) 0.47 -0.22 -32% 13,272,480 14,189,793 917,313 7% 0.42 0.08 24% 15,819,391 10,470,760 -5,348,631 -34% 0.15 -0.04 -22% 6,297,551 6,132,468 -165,083 -3% 0.17 0.05 36% 5,340,406 2,646,976 2,721,076 5,320,248 -20,158 0% 0.11 0.01 9% 19,905,096 14,189,687 -5,715,409 -29% 0.11 0.01 8% 19,080,287 10,682,992 -8,397,295 -44% 0.10 -0.15 -60% 29,496,979 19,442,044 -10,054,936 -34% 0.09 -0.15 -62% 21,514,176 23,026,527 1,512,351 7% 0.11 4,166,837 0.06 1,900,153 7,594,674 0.12 0.01 8% 11,159,177 9,265,060 -1,894,117 -17% 0.11 -0.01 -11% 9,522,181 6,462,167 -3,060,014 -32% 0.07 -0.06 -46% 8,730,327 7,196,253 -1,534,074 -18% 0.08 -0.06 -41% 7,150,171 9,328,666 2,178,495 30% 0.14 0.00 0% 9,855,567 8,801,689 -1,053,877 -11% 0.13 -0.01 -8% 8,767,684 3,854,498 -4,913,186 -56% 0.16 0.05 43% 7,252,369 4,858,754 -2,393,615 -33% 0.16 0.00 -1% 6,826,276 5,874,709 -951,567 -14% 0.36 0.04 12% 17,057,974 16,099,659 -958,315 -6% 0.30 -0.07 -18% 14,896,621 14,073,791 -822,830 -6% 0.12 -0.02 -17% 7,618,366 4,953,323 -2,665,042 -35% 0.12 -0.01 -7% 4,422,841 6,913,304 2,490,463 56% 0.30 0.02 7% 16,536,249 10,111,245 -6,425,004 -39% 0.31 0.03 10% 13,704,450 15,170,245 1,465,795 11% 0.52 0.25 88% 20,451,742 15,592,981 -4,858,761 -24% 0.41 0.12 43% 18,786,757 14,048,190 -4,738,567 -25% 21 of 90 ------- 2011 vs 2012 S02 and NOx Comparisons, Quarterly Acid Rain Program and Clean Air Interstate Rule Emissions, Emission Rates, and Heat Input Changes at Facilities (Coal Units < 2011 data are final, 2012 are preliminary data submitted to EPA from sources as of August 1, 2012. EPA will update as it receives and verifies data 2011 S02 2012 S02 Emissions Emissions 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 Facility Name State County Quarter (tons) (tons) Emissions (tons) Emissions (%) Dean H Mitchell Generating Station IN Lake 2 Edwardsport IN Knox 1 F B Culley Generating Station IN Warrick 1 280 496 216 77% F B Culley Generating Station IN Warrick 2 344 Frank E Ratts IN Pike 1 2,726 1,141 -1,585 -58% Frank E Ratts IN Pike 2 2,083 1,094 -989 -47% Gibson IN Gibson 1 4,961 4,871 -90 -2% Gibson IN Gibson 2 4,735 6,488 1,753 37% Harding Street Station (EW Stout) IN Marion 1 6,882 1,486 -5,396 -78% Harding Street Station (EW Stout) IN Marion 2 5,755 7,197 1,442 25% IPL Eagle Valley Generating Station IN Morgan 1 3,443 702 -2,741 -80% IPL Eagle Valley Generating Station IN Morgan 2 3,504 385 -3,119 -89% Merom IN Sullivan 1 2,346 1,811 -535 -23% Merom IN Sullivan 2 1,751 906 -845 -48% Michigan City Generating Station IN LaPorte 1 3,298 1,729 -1,569 -48% Michigan City Generating Station IN LaPorte 2 3,443 3,216 -228 -7% Petersburg IN Pike 1 7,268 3,565 -3,703 -51% Petersburg IN Pike 2 8,329 2,840 -5,489 -66% R Gallagher IN Floyd 1 1,113 113 -1,000 -90% R Gallagher IN Floyd 2 374 113 -261 -70% R M Schahfer Generating Station IN Jasper 1 2,496 3,715 1,220 49% R M Schahfer Generating Station IN Jasper 2 5,282 3,156 -2,126 -40% Rockport IN Spencer 1 11,028 12,386 1,358 12% Rockport IN Spencer 2 11,119 12,387 1,268 11% State Line Generating Station (IN) IN Lake 1 2,329 2,039 -290 -12% State Line Generating Station (IN) IN Lake 2 1,821 Tanners Creek IN Dearborn 1 7,401 6,389 -1,012 -14% Tanners Creek IN Dearborn 2 4,781 2,136 -2,646 -55% Wabash River Gen Station IN Vigo 1 9,884 5,456 -4,428 -45% Wabash River Gen Station IN Vigo 2 13,002 9,994 -3,008 -23% 22 of 90 ------- 3nly) 2011 S02 2012 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2011 NOX 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 2011 NOX Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emissions Emissions NOX Emissions 2012 vs 2011 NOX Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (%) (tons) (tons) (tons) Emissions (%) (lb/mmBtu) 0.12 0.19 0.07 56% 260 297 37 14% 0.11 0.15 183 0.08 2.33 2.37 0.04 2% 299 95 -204 -68% 0.26 2.18 1.81 -0.36 -17% 254 121 -133 -52% 0.27 0.23 0.24 0.01 4% 4,455 2,832 -1,624 -36% 0.21 0.24 0.26 0.02 10% 4,504 3,306 -1,198 -27% 0.23 1.31 0.33 -0.98 -75% 890 626 -264 -30% 0.17 1.13 1.47 0.34 30% 637 757 120 19% 0.13 2.01 2.20 0.18 9% 557 109 -448 -80% 0.33 2.06 1.92 -0.14 -7% 574 60 -515 -90% 0.34 0.22 0.25 0.03 16% 1,064 589 -475 -45% 0.10 0.22 0.20 -0.02 -8% 720 368 -352 -49% 0.09 0.92 1.00 0.08 9% 349 163 -186 -53% 0.10 0.89 1.09 0.20 22% 389 328 -61 -16% 0.10 0.56 0.28 -0.28 -51% 2,536 2,493 -42 -2% 0.20 0.63 0.28 -0.35 -56% 2,212 1,926 -286 -13% 0.17 0.87 0.67 -0.20 -23% 473 68 -406 -86% 0.37 0.63 0.62 -0.01 -2% 208 63 -145 -70% 0.35 0.27 0.47 0.20 76% 1,635 1,237 -398 -24% 0.18 0.41 0.36 -0.04 -10% 1,979 1,381 -598 -30% 0.15 0.67 0.58 -0.09 -14% 4,167 5,058 891 21% 0.25 0.71 0.58 -0.13 -18% 3,956 4,471 515 13% 0.25 0.56 0.70 0.15 26% 1,952 1,511 -442 -23% 0.47 0.49 1,696 0.46 1.24 1.34 0.10 8% 1,489 1,137 -352 -24% 0.25 1.45 1.26 -0.18 -13% 857 447 -409 -48% 0.26 2.78 2.18 -0.59 -21% 1,129 856 -273 -24% 0.32 3.10 3.14 0.04 1% 1,457 1,071 -386 -26% 0.35 23 of 90 ------- 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 NOX 2012 vs 2011 2011 Heat 2012 Heat 2012 vs 2011 2012 vs 2011 Emission Rate Emission Rate NOX Emission Input Input Heat Input Heat Input (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) Rate (%) (mmBtu) (mmBtu) (mmBtu) (%) 0.11 0.00 1% 4,723,467 5,363,364 639,897 14% 4,687,302 0.20 -0.06 -23% 2,335,588 962,165 -1,373,423 -59% 0.20 -0.06 -24% 1,914,338 1,207,687 -706,651 -37% 0.14 -0.07 -33% 42,720,324 40,400,621 -2,319,702 -5% 0.13 -0.09 -41% 39,552,255 49,420,225 9,867,970 25% 0.14 -0.03 -19% 10,520,474 9,107,502 -1,412,972 -13% 0.15 0.03 23% 10,158,802 9,802,166 -356,635 -4% 0.34 0.02 5% 3,423,248 639,157 -2,784,091 -81% 0.30 -0.04 -12% 3,397,854 400,875 -2,996,979 -88% 0.08 -0.02 -17% 21,474,179 14,352,648 -7,121,531 -33% 0.08 -0.01 -9% 15,889,895 8,955,483 -6,934,412 -44% 0.09 0.00 -3% 7,177,065 3,446,980 -3,730,085 -52% 0.11 0.01 10% 7,764,333 5,922,402 -1,841,930 -24% 0.19 0.00 -1% 25,937,599 25,833,699 -103,901 0% 0.19 0.02 12% 26,456,937 20,632,457 -5,824,480 -22% 0.40 0.03 8% 2,565,256 338,043 -2,227,213 -87% 0.34 -0.01 -2% 1,187,859 365,705 -822,154 -69% 0.16 -0.02 -11% 18,508,717 15,694,624 -2,814,093 -15% 0.16 0.01 5% 26,036,575 17,331,924 -8,704,652 -33% 0.24 -0.02 -7% 32,886,868 42,987,667 10,100,800 31% 0.21 -0.04 -17% 31,156,603 42,568,484 11,411,881 37% 0.52 0.05 12% 8,349,694 5,791,090 -2,558,605 -31% 7,375,567 0.24 -0.01 -5% 11,901,285 9,536,414 -2,364,870 -20% 0.26 0.01 2% 6,616,253 3,379,068 -3,237,185 -49% 0.34 0.03 8% 7,122,072 5,001,424 -2,120,648 -30% 0.34 -0.01 -3% 8,377,540 6,359,337 -2,018,203 -24% 24 of 90 ------- 2011 vs 2012 S02 and NOx Comparisons, Quarterly Acid Rain Program and Clean Air Interstate Rule Emissions, Emission Rates, and Heat Input Changes at Facilities (Coal Units < 2011 data are final, 2012 are preliminary data submitted to EPA from sources as of August 1, 2012. EPA will update as it receives and verifies data 2011 S02 2012 S02 Emissions Emissions 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 Facility Name State County Quarter (tons) (tons) Emissions (tons) Emissions (%) Whitewater Valley IN Wayne 1 959 0 -958 -100% Whitewater Valley IN Wayne 2 1,164 224 -940 -81% Holcomb KS Finney 1 377 220 -157 -42% Holcomb KS Finney 2 453 189 -264 -58% Jeffrey Energy Center KS Pottawatomie 1 284 314 30 11% Jeffrey Energy Center KS Pottawatomie 2 435 267 -168 -39% La Cygne KS Linn 1 4,275 4,296 21 0% La Cygne KS Linn 2 5,304 4,144 -1,161 -22% Lawrence Energy Center KS Douglas 1 773 435 -338 -44% Lawrence Energy Center KS Douglas 2 688 407 -280 -41% Nearman Creek KS Wyandotte 1 1,443 1,140 -304 -21% Nearman Creek KS Wyandotte 2 1,541 286 -1,255 -81% Quindaro KS Wyandotte 1 1,019 723 -296 -29% Quindaro KS Wyandotte 2 858 650 -208 -24% Riverton KS Cherokee 1 740 0 -739 -100% Riverton KS Cherokee 2 419 401 -18 -4% Tecumseh Energy Center KS Shawnee 1 1,141 872 -270 -24% Tecumseh Energy Center KS Shawnee 2 1,083 656 -428 -39% Big Sandy KY Lawrence 1 12,369 4,515 -7,854 -63% Big Sandy KY Lawrence 2 10,733 6,836 -3,897 -36% Cane Run KY Jefferson 1 2,367 1,012 -1,355 -57% Cane Run KY Jefferson 2 2,197 2,113 -84 -4% Coleman KY Hancock 1 910 1,136 225 25% Coleman KY Hancock 2 1,366 D B Wilson KY Ohio 1 2,406 1,681 -725 -30% D B Wilson KY Ohio 2 2,348 1,685 -664 -28% E W Brown KY Mercer 1 200 131 -69 -34% E W Brown KY Mercer 2 562 East Bend KY Boone 1 456 453 -3 -1% East Bend KY Boone 2 419 301 -118 -28% 25 of 90 ------- 3nly) 2011 S02 2012 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2011 NOX 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 2011 NOX Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emissions Emissions NOX Emissions 2012 vs 2011 NOX Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (%) (tons) (tons) (tons) Emissions (%) (lb/mmBtu) 3.60 3.67 0.07 2% 68 0 -68 -100% 0.25 3.76 3.34 -0.43 -11% 73 19 -54 -74% 0.24 0.12 0.14 0.02 18% 1,013 323 -691 -68% 0.31 0.13 0.09 -0.04 -29% 1,111 329 -782 -70% 0.31 0.02 0.02 0.00 30% 3,585 1,972 -1,613 -45% 0.21 0.02 0.02 0.00 -14% 2,926 1,813 -1,113 -38% 0.16 0.50 0.36 -0.14 -28% 1,960 2,420 460 23% 0.23 0.38 0.33 -0.05 -14% 2,630 2,525 -106 -4% 0.19 0.15 0.17 0.01 9% 1,206 840 -366 -30% 0.24 0.13 0.10 -0.03 -23% 1,239 1,010 -229 -18% 0.24 0.61 0.64 0.04 6% 974 724 -250 -26% 0.41 0.66 0.69 0.03 5% 1,216 168 -1,048 -86% 0.52 0.63 0.56 -0.06 -10% 884 770 -113 -13% 0.54 0.65 0.50 -0.15 -23% 657 766 109 17% 0.50 0.99 0.04 -0.95 -96% 268 0 -267 -100% 0.36 0.90 1.45 0.54 60% 170 86 -83 -49% 0.37 0.62 0.57 -0.05 -8% 487 356 -132 -27% 0.26 0.59 0.54 -0.04 -7% 549 321 -227 -41% 0.30 1.42 1.54 0.12 8% 2,031 629 -1,402 -69% 0.23 1.44 1.54 0.10 7% 1,599 545 -1,054 -66% 0.21 0.50 0.37 -0.14 -27% 1,577 908 -670 -42% 0.34 0.54 0.52 -0.02 -3% 1,297 1,352 55 4% 0.32 0.19 0.25 0.06 33% 1,662 1,569 -93 -6% 0.35 0.29 1,685 0.36 0.54 0.44 -0.10 -18% 260 222 -39 -15% 0.06 0.52 0.43 -0.09 -17% 253 243 -10 -4% 0.06 0.04 0.05 0.00 8% 1,454 1,047 -407 -28% 0.32 0.14 1,257 0.31 0.08 0.14 0.05 65% 476 523 47 10% 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.00 6% 799 610 -189 -24% 0.15 26 of 90 ------- 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 NOX 2012 vs 2011 Emission Rate Emission Rate NOX Emission (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) Rate (%) 2011 Heat Input (mmBtu) 2012 Heat Input (mmBtu) 2012 vs 2011 Heat Input (mmBtu) 2012 vs 2011 Heat Input (%) 0.19 -0.07 -26% 532,478 35 -532,443 -100% 0.29 0.05 21% 618,731 134,397 -484,333 -78% 0.20 -0.11 -36% 6,460,424 3,199,412 -3,261,011 -50% 0.16 -0.15 -50% 7,154,350 4,195,416 -2,958,933 -41% 0.13 -0.07 -35% 34,752,253 29,552,933 -5,199,320 -15% 0.14 -0.02 -13% 36,757,983 26,204,020 -10,553,963 -29% 0.20 -0.03 -12% 16,941,334 23,743,487 6,802,152 40% 0.20 0.01 6% 27,705,149 25,128,717 -2,576,432 -9% 0.32 0.08 36% 10,230,850 5,260,199 -4,970,650 -49% 0.25 0.01 6% 10,441,355 8,036,304 -2,405,052 -23% 0.41 0.00 0% 4,769,484 3,548,866 -1,220,618 -26% 0.41 -0.11 -22% 4,655,079 825,570 -3,829,510 -82% 0.60 0.06 11% 3,255,622 2,562,406 -693,216 -21% 0.59 0.09 19% 2,628,771 2,574,749 -54,022 -2% 0.21 -0.15 -41% 1,487,640 2,144 -1,485,495 -100% 0.31 -0.05 -15% 928,920 553,925 -374,995 -40% 0.23 -0.03 -12% 3,692,554 3,055,043 -637,511 -17% 0.27 -0.03 -10% 3,702,295 2,419,484 -1,282,810 -35% 0.21 -0.02 -8% 17,430,007 5,871,741 -11,558,266 -66% 0.12 -0.09 -43% 14,937,827 8,898,325 -6,039,503 -40% 0.33 -0.01 -2% 9,378,950 5,486,482 -3,892,468 -42% 0.33 0.01 5% 8,193,441 8,156,861 -36,580 0% 0.35 0.00 1% 9,527,344 8,925,222 -602,122 -6% 9,463,117 0.06 0.00 0% 8,956,725 7,666,408 -1,290,316 -14% 0.06 0.01 11% 9,043,654 7,815,425 -1,228,229 -14% 0.38 0.06 18% 9,082,721 5,544,859 -3,537,862 -39% 8,099,708 0.16 0.07 83% 11,012,507 6,623,206 -4,389,301 -40% 0.16 0.02 12% 11,015,313 7,493,791 -3,521,522 -32% 27 of 90 ------- 2011 vs 2012 S02 and NOx Comparisons, Quarterly Acid Rain Program and Clean Air Interstate Rule Emissions, Emission Rates, and Heat Input Changes at Facilities (Coal Units < 2011 data are final, 2012 are preliminary data submitted to EPA from sources as of August 1, 2012. EPA will update as it receives and verifies data 2011 S02 2012 S02 Emissions Emissions 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 Facility Name State County Quarter (tons) (tons) Emissions (tons) Emissions (%) Elmer Smith KY Daviess 1 3,097 837 -2,260 -73% Elmer Smith KY Daviess 2 1,662 991 -671 -40% Ghent KY Carroll 1 2,742 3,464 722 26% Ghent KY Carroll 2 2,340 1,511 -830 -35% Green River KY Muhlenberg 1 4,596 5,291 695 15% Green River KY Muhlenberg 2 4,600 4,900 300 7% H L Spurlock KY Mason 1 1,958 1,328 -629 -32% H L Spurlock KY Mason 2 1,537 1,189 -348 -23% HMP&L Station 2 KY Henderson 1 1,467 870 -597 -41% HMP&L Station 2 KY Henderson 2 1,422 John S. Cooper KY Pulaski 1 5,653 2,186 -3,466 -61% John S. Cooper KY Pulaski 2 3,572 1,973 -1,599 -45% Mill Creek KY Jefferson 1 5,846 7,402 1,556 27% Mill Creek KY Jefferson 2 5,602 6,936 1,334 24% Paradise KY Muhlenberg 1 10,404 7,509 -2,895 -28% Paradise KY Muhlenberg 2 8,707 5,777 -2,930 -34% R D Green KY Webster 1 851 494 -357 -42% R D Green KY Webster 2 648 606 -42 -6% Robert Reid KY Webster 1 1,066 Robert Reid KY Webster 2 749 1 -748 -100% Shawnee KY McCracken 1 7,758 5,171 -2,587 -33% Shawnee KY McCracken 2 6,472 8,108 1,636 25% Trimble County KY Trimble 1 532 853 322 61% Trimble County KY Trimble 2 797 657 -141 -18% Tyrone KY Woodford 1 202 Tyrone KY Woodford 2 0 William C. Dale KY Clark 1 1,848 448 -1,400 -76% William C. Dale KY Clark 2 1,516 93 -1,423 -94% Big Cajun 2 LA Pointe Coupee 1 10,080 8,401 -1,679 -17% Big Cajun 2 LA Pointe Coupee 2 8,643 7,297 -1,346 -16% 28 of 90 ------- 3nly) 2011 S02 2012 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2011 NOX 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 2011 NOX Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emissions Emissions NOX Emissions 2012 vs 2011 NOX Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (%) (tons) (tons) (tons) Emissions (%) (lb/mmBtu) 0.76 0.26 -0.50 -65% 1,131 741 -390 -34% 0.28 0.47 0.35 -0.11 -25% 910 926 16 2% 0.25 0.18 0.24 0.06 32% 1,889 2,151 262 14% 0.13 0.16 0.11 -0.05 -32% 1,810 1,465 -344 -19% 0.13 3.90 4.00 0.10 3% 473 565 92 20% 0.40 4.06 3.69 -0.37 -9% 476 550 74 16% 0.42 0.16 0.11 -0.04 -28% 930 896 -34 -4% 0.08 0.13 0.12 -0.01 -9% 884 773 -111 -13% 0.08 0.49 0.32 -0.17 -35% 217 186 -31 -14% 0.07 0.49 238 0.08 2.27 1.91 -0.37 -16% 1,153 512 -641 -56% 0.46 2.31 1.39 -0.91 -40% 707 363 -344 -49% 0.46 0.52 0.68 0.16 31% 2,088 1,627 -461 -22% 0.18 0.59 0.75 0.16 28% 1,990 1,530 -460 -23% 0.21 0.66 0.37 -0.29 -44% 2,089 2,569 481 23% 0.13 0.74 0.31 -0.44 -59% 1,899 2,552 654 34% 0.16 0.16 0.17 0.00 2% 1,254 606 -649 -52% 0.24 0.12 0.14 0.01 10% 1,087 847 -241 -22% 0.21 4.48 109 0.46 4.69 2.47 -2.21 -47% 68 0 -68 -100% 0.43 0.69 0.67 -0.02 -2% 4,278 2,631 -1,646 -38% 0.38 0.60 0.77 0.17 28% 3,843 4,251 408 11% 0.36 0.05 0.08 0.02 45% 554 723 170 31% 0.05 0.08 0.09 0.01 10% 458 767 309 68% 0.05 1.36 64 0.43 0.00 0 0.02 1.34 1.33 -0.01 -1% 517 117 -400 -77% 0.37 1.40 1.29 -0.10 -7% 401 28 -373 -93% 0.37 0.59 0.67 0.09 15% 3,320 2,293 -1,027 -31% 0.19 0.58 0.64 0.07 12% 2,825 2,062 -763 -27% 0.19 29 of 90 ------- 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 NOX 2012 vs 2011 Emission Rate Emission Rate NOX Emission (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) Rate (%) 2011 Heat Input (mmBtu) 2012 Heat Input (mmBtu) 2012 vs 2011 Heat Input (mmBtu) 2012 vs 2011 Heat Input (%) 0.23 -0.04 -16% 8,176,296 6,386,781 -1,789,515 -22% 0.33 0.07 29% 7,138,586 5,637,505 -1,501,081 -21% 0.15 0.02 19% 30,149,203 28,885,228 -1,263,975 -4% 0.11 -0.02 -15% 28,406,029 26,981,606 -1,424,423 -5% 0.43 0.03 7% 2,357,972 2,643,572 285,600 12% 0.41 -0.01 -1% 2,268,304 2,655,462 387,157 17% 0.08 0.00 2% 24,535,725 23,150,188 -1,385,537 -6% 0.08 0.00 3% 22,860,277 19,466,605 -3,393,673 -15% 0.07 0.00 -7% 5,996,374 5,504,954 -491,420 -8% 5,840,984 0.45 -0.02 -4% 4,970,910 2,295,151 -2,675,759 -54% 0.26 -0.20 -44% 3,096,045 2,830,071 -265,975 -9% 0.15 -0.04 -19% 22,596,033 21,839,176 -756,858 -3% 0.17 -0.04 -21% 19,104,706 18,479,097 -625,609 -3% 0.13 -0.01 -5% 31,609,275 40,884,129 9,274,853 29% 0.14 -0.03 -16% 23,383,975 37,500,983 14,117,009 60% 0.21 -0.04 -15% 10,327,361 5,901,414 -4,425,947 -43% 0.19 -0.02 -8% 10,374,776 8,793,356 -1,581,420 -15% 476,298 0.24 -0.19 -44% 319,726 1,113 -318,613 -100% 0.34 -0.04 -10% 22,596,346 15,439,389 -7,156,958 -32% 0.40 0.05 13% 21,611,895 21,134,772 -477,123 -2% 0.06 0.01 18% 20,362,793 22,531,030 2,168,236 11% 0.11 0.06 124% 18,923,152 14,152,793 -4,770,359 -25% 297,224 185 0.35 -0.03 -8% 2,761,983 674,764 -2,087,219 -76% 0.39 0.02 6% 2,166,939 143,538 -2,023,401 -93% 0.18 -0.01 -4% 34,447,703 24,903,594 -9,544,109 -28% 0.18 -0.01 -3% 30,051,470 22,639,789 -7,411,680 -25% 30 of 90 ------- 2011 vs 2012 S02 and NOx Comparisons, Quarterly Acid Rain Program and Clean Air Interstate Rule Emissions, Emission Rates, and Heat Input Changes at Facilities (Coal Units < 2011 data are final, 2012 are preliminary data submitted to EPA from sources as of August 1, 2012. EPA will update as it receives and verifies data 2011 S02 2012 S02 Emissions Emissions 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 Facility Name State County Quarter (tons) (tons) Emissions (tons) Emissions (%) Brame Energy Center LA Rapides 1 1,889 2,474 585 31% Brame Energy Center LA Rapides 2 2,535 1,520 -1,015 -40% Dolet Hills Power Station LA De Soto 1 5,110 4,728 -382 -7% Dolet Hills Power Station LA De Soto 2 4,543 5,061 518 11% R S Nelson LA Calcasieu 1 2,722 1,519 -1,203 -44% R S Nelson LA Calcasieu 2 3,372 1,634 -1,738 -52% Brayton Point MA Bristol 1 8,127 2,432 -5,695 -70% Brayton Point MA Bristol 2 4,597 534 -4,064 -88% Mount Tom MA Hampden 1 69 34 -35 -50% Mount Tom MA Hampden 2 18 Salem Harbor MA Essex 1 1,182 762 -420 -36% Salem Harbor MA Essex 2 453 279 -175 -39% AES Warrior Run MD Allegany 1 308 363 55 18% AES Warrior Run MD Allegany 2 280 255 -25 -9% Brandon Shores MD Anne Arundel 1 488 418 -70 -14% Brandon Shores MD Anne Arundel 2 810 966 155 19% C P Crane MD Baltimore 1 1,506 106 -1,400 -93% C P Crane MD Baltimore 2 2,268 486 -1,782 -79% Chalk Point MD Prince George's 1 1,389 43 -1,345 -97% Chalk Point MD Prince George's 2 2,583 3,057 474 18% Dickerson MD Montgomery 1 273 35 -239 -87% Dickerson MD Montgomery 2 372 148 -224 -60% Herbert A Wagner MD Anne Arundel 1 2,562 1,418 -1,144 -45% Herbert A Wagner MD Anne Arundel 2 2,678 1,513 -1,165 -44% Morgantown MD Charles 1 1,247 396 -851 -68% Morgantown MD Charles 2 2,274 354 -1,920 -84% R. Paul Smith Power Station MD Washington 1 143 1 -142 -99% R. Paul Smith Power Station MD Washington 2 109 173 63 58% B C Cobb MI Muskegon 1 2,462 1,693 -769 -31% B C Cobb MI Muskegon 2 2,155 1,466 -689 -32% 31 of 90 ------- 3nly) 2011 S02 2012 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2011 NOX 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 2011 NOX Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emissions Emissions NOX Emissions 2012 vs 2011 NOX Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (%) (tons) (tons) (tons) Emissions (%) (lb/mmBtu) 0.51 0.63 0.11 22% 520 581 61 12% 0.14 0.52 0.58 0.06 11% 774 439 -335 -43% 0.16 0.85 0.79 -0.06 -8% 1,196 1,190 -6 0% 0.20 0.86 0.85 -0.01 -1% 1,060 1,205 145 14% 0.20 0.69 0.75 0.06 8% 610 451 -159 -26% 0.16 0.65 0.68 0.03 5% 958 383 -574 -60% 0.18 1.07 1.06 -0.01 -1% 1,251 294 -958 -77% 0.16 1.10 0.68 -0.42 -38% 614 121 -493 -80% 0.15 0.21 0.34 0.13 63% 38 14 -24 -63% 0.12 0.18 11 0.11 0.93 1.24 0.31 33% 303 36 -267 -88% 0.24 0.99 1.10 0.11 11% 102 19 -83 -81% 0.22 0.17 0.17 0.00 2% 146 186 40 28% 0.08 0.17 0.17 0.00 -1% 148 103 -45 -30% 0.09 0.05 0.10 0.04 77% 1,371 1,243 -128 -9% 0.15 0.10 0.12 0.02 25% 1,039 1,437 399 38% 0.12 0.97 0.38 -0.59 -61% 680 102 -578 -85% 0.44 1.80 0.41 -1.39 -77% 604 458 -146 -24% 0.48 0.24 0.16 -0.07 -31% 1,181 58 -1,123 -95% 0.20 0.66 1.69 1.03 155% 1,063 410 -653 -61% 0.27 0.13 0.13 0.00 -3% 611 70 -541 -89% 0.30 0.30 0.22 -0.08 -25% 324 170 -154 -47% 0.26 1.07 1.12 0.05 4% 438 526 87 20% 0.18 1.09 1.27 0.17 16% 518 261 -256 -50% 0.21 0.12 0.07 -0.04 -38% 439 149 -290 -66% 0.04 0.29 0.09 -0.20 -68% 313 124 -189 -60% 0.04 1.29 1.20 -0.09 -7% 41 0 -41 -99% 0.37 1.35 1.32 -0.03 -2% 24 50 26 105% 0.30 1.05 0.92 -0.13 -12% 629 558 -71 -11% 0.27 0.93 0.70 -0.23 -25% 591 567 -23 -4% 0.25 32 of 90 ------- 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 NOX 2012 vs 2011 2011 Heat 2012 Heat 2012 vs 2011 2012 vs 2011 Emission Rate Emission Rate NOX Emission Input Input Heat Input Heat Input (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) Rate (%) (mmBtu) (mmBtu) (mmBtu) (%) 0.15 0.01 4% 7,364,210 7,902,645 538,435 7% 0.17 0.01 5% 9,762,319 5,262,890 -4,499,429 -46% 0.20 0.00 -1% 12,020,470 12,040,062 19,592 0% 0.20 0.00 1% 10,574,806 11,901,358 1,326,552 13% 0.22 0.07 43% 7,864,136 4,065,647 -3,798,489 -48% 0.16 -0.02 -14% 10,376,524 4,803,942 -5,572,582 -54% 0.13 -0.04 -22% 15,171,965 4,578,327 -10,593,638 -70% 0.15 0.01 5% 8,367,965 1,566,098 -6,801,867 -81% 0.14 0.02 20% 658,050 203,097 200,394 -457,656 -70% 0.06 -0.18 -75% 2,552,028 1,234,208 -1,317,820 -52% 0.07 -0.15 -66% 917,331 505,961 -411,371 -45% 0.09 0.01 10% 3,655,399 4,236,936 581,537 16% 0.07 -0.02 -24% 3,290,616 3,017,172 -273,445 -8% 0.29 0.13 88% 17,936,397 8,663,798 -9,272,600 -52% 0.18 0.06 45% 17,016,885 16,226,081 -790,804 -5% 0.36 -0.08 -17% 3,090,171 559,438 -2,530,733 -82% 0.39 -0.09 -19% 2,513,755 2,352,765 -160,990 -6% 0.22 0.02 8% 11,807,755 534,055 -11,273,700 -95% 0.23 -0.05 -17% 7,812,815 3,624,402 -4,188,413 -54% 0.26 -0.04 -12% 4,099,789 534,057 -3,565,732 -87% 0.25 0.00 -1% 2,511,070 1,337,545 -1,173,525 -47% 0.42 0.23 126% 4,768,410 2,531,336 -2,237,074 -47% 0.22 0.01 4% 4,904,889 2,390,075 -2,514,814 -51% 0.03 -0.01 -33% 21,071,358 10,745,582 -10,325,776 -49% 0.03 -0.01 -19% 15,710,144 7,682,151 -8,027,993 -51% 0.39 0.02 5% 221,110 1,606 -219,504 -99% 0.38 0.08 27% 162,483 261,983 99,499 61% 0.30 0.04 14% 4,694,629 3,665,982 -1,028,646 -22% 0.27 0.02 6% 4,650,492 4,210,539 -439,952 -9% 33 of 90 ------- 2011 vs 2012 S02 and NOx Comparisons, Quarterly Acid Rain Program and Clean Air Interstate Rule Emissions, Emission Rates, and Heat Input Changes at Facilities (Coal Units < 2011 data are final, 2012 are preliminary data submitted to EPA from sources as of August 1, 2012. EPA will update as it receives and verifies data 2011 S02 2012 S02 Emissions Emissions 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 Facility Name State County Quarter (tons) (tons) Emissions (tons) Emissions (%) Belle River MI Saint Clair 1 4,098 6,185 2,087 51% Belle River MI Saint Clair 2 6,340 7,271 931 15% Dan E Karn MI Bay 1 2,839 1,547 -1,292 -45% Dan E Karn MI Bay 2 2,311 1,623 -688 -30% DTE Pontiac North LLC MI Oakland 1 DTE Pontiac North LLC MI Oakland 2 Eckert Station MI Ingham 1 1,361 702 -659 -48% Eckert Station MI Ingham 2 1,140 1,078 -62 -5% Endicott Generating MI Hillsdale 1 273 281 8 3% Endicott Generating MI Hillsdale 2 240 287 47 20% Erickson MI Eaton 1 420 805 384 91% Erickson MI Eaton 2 823 721 -102 -12% Harbor Beach MI Huron 1 523 259 -263 -50% Harbor Beach MI Huron 2 196 70 -126 -64% J B Sims MI Ottawa 1 97 64 -32 -33% J B Sims MI Ottawa 2 80 58 -21 -27% J C Weadock MI Bay 1 2,038 1,012 -1,026 -50% J C Weadock MI Bay 2 1,959 1,615 -344 -18% J H Campbell MI Ottawa 1 6,679 4,453 -2,226 -33% J H Campbell MI Ottawa 2 7,101 3,547 -3,554 -50% J R Whiting MI Monroe 1 1,776 663 -1,113 -63% J R Whiting MI Monroe 2 1,381 1,073 -308 -22% James De Young MI Ottawa 1 221 James De Young MI Ottawa 2 294 Monroe MI Monroe 1 12,807 11,538 -1,268 -10% Monroe MI Monroe 2 11,762 14,742 2,981 25% Presque Isle MI Marquette 1 2,036 1,510 -526 -26% Presque Isle MI Marquette 2 2,057 1,391 -666 -32% River Rouge MI Wayne 1 2,128 2,185 57 3% River Rouge MI Wayne 2 2,764 2,271 -493 -18% 34 of 90 ------- 3nly) 2011 S02 Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) 2012 S02 Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) 2012 vs 2011 S02 Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) 2012 vs 2011 S02 2011 NOX Emission Rate Emissions (%) (tons) 2012 NOX Emissions (tons) 2012 vs 2011 NOX Emissions (tons) 2012 vs 2011 NOX Emissions (%) 2011 NOX Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) 0.59 0.62 0.03 5% 1,540 2,067 526 34% 0.22 0.63 0.65 0.02 3% 2,202 2,274 72 3% 0.22 0.77 0.58 -0.19 -25% 219 489 270 123% 0.06 0.83 0.65 -0.18 -22% 174 393 219 126% 0.06 0.55 0.52 -0.02 -4% 540 302 -238 -44% 0.22 0.52 0.66 0.14 26% 494 381 -113 -23% 0.23 0.46 0.47 0.02 3% 151 116 -35 -23% 0.25 0.42 0.47 0.04 10% 109 133 24 22% 0.19 0.52 0.59 0.08 15% 223 337 113 51% 0.27 0.53 0.68 0.15 28% 369 215 -155 -42% 0.24 1.51 1.13 -0.37 -25% 208 122 -86 -41% 0.60 1.46 1.26 -0.19 -13% 85 31 -54 -63% 0.63 0.22 0.19 -0.03 -15% 105 84 -21 -20% 0.24 0.21 0.16 -0.05 -23% 89 86 -3 -3% 0.23 0.88 0.60 -0.28 -32% 698 453 -246 -35% 0.30 0.94 0.86 -0.08 -9% 629 654 25 4% 0.30 0.64 0.58 -0.05 -8% 1,394 1,216 -178 -13% 0.13 0.61 0.49 -0.12 -19% 1,949 954 -995 -51% 0.17 0.65 0.54 -0.11 -17% 672 301 -371 -55% 0.25 0.61 0.64 0.03 6% 582 409 -173 -30% 0.26 0.95 95 0.41 1.32 89 0.40 0.68 0.66 -0.02 -2% 4,663 2,788 -1,875 -40% 0.25 0.60 0.70 0.10 17% 4,123 3,731 -392 -10% 0.21 0.59 0.51 -0.07 -13% 1,328 916 -412 -31% 0.38 0.60 0.51 -0.09 -16% 1,296 868 -428 -33% 0.38 0.84 0.70 -0.13 -16% 578 604 26 5% 0.23 0.81 0.90 0.08 10% 941 594 -347 -37% 0.28 35 of 90 ------- 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 NOX 2012 vs 2011 Emission Rate Emission Rate NOX Emission (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) Rate (%) 2011 Heat Input (mmBtu) 2012 Heat Input (mmBtu) 2012 vs 2011 2012 vs 2011 Heat Input Heat Input (mmBtu) (%) 0.21 -0.02 -7% 13,834,440 19,927,189 6,092,749 44% 0.20 -0.02 -7% 20,165,440 22,462,780 2,297,340 11% 0.18 0.12 206% 7,387,752 5,379,723 -2,008,029 -27% 0.16 0.10 153% 5,542,820 4,963,716 -579,104 -10% 0.23 0.01 4% 4,983,499 2,682,557 -2,300,942 -46% 0.23 0.01 3% 4,372,252 3,282,861 -1,089,392 -25% 0.20 -0.06 -23% 1,193,830 1,190,098 -3,732 0% 0.22 0.02 13% 1,131,779 1,225,225 93,446 8% 0.25 -0.03 -10% 1,625,389 2,709,862 1,084,473 67% 0.20 -0.04 -15% 3,111,653 2,126,318 -985,335 -32% 0.53 -0.07 -11% 694,412 457,296 -237,116 -34% 0.57 -0.07 -10% 269,205 110,820 -158,386 -59% 0.24 0.00 1% 879,634 693,184 -186,450 -21% 0.24 0.00 2% 756,200 719,757 -36,443 -5% 0.27 -0.03 -11% 4,609,889 3,352,106 -1,257,782 -27% 0.35 0.05 15% 4,179,546 3,768,592 -410,955 -10% 0.16 0.03 20% 21,002,353 15,229,118 -5,773,235 -27% 0.13 -0.03 -21% 23,387,416 14,458,300 -8,929,116 -38% 0.25 0.00 -1% 5,448,614 2,452,817 -2,995,797 -55% 0.24 -0.01 -5% 4,543,664 3,345,702 -1,197,962 -26% 464,240 443,740 0.16 -0.09 -35% 37,759,092 34,852,554 -2,906,538 -8% 0.18 -0.03 -15% 39,117,231 41,834,268 2,717,037 7% 0.31 -0.07 -19% 6,928,997 5,878,842 -1,050,155 -15% 0.32 -0.06 -17% 6,822,210 5,477,257 -1,344,953 -20% 0.19 -0.03 -15% 5,094,419 6,237,455 1,143,036 22% 0.23 -0.04 -15% 6,789,338 5,059,840 -1,729,497 -25% 36 of 90 ------- 2011 vs 2012 S02 and NOx Comparisons, Quarterly Acid Rain Program and Clean Air Interstate Rule Emissions, Emission Rates, and Heat Input Changes at Facilities (Coal Units < 2011 data are final, 2012 are preliminary data submitted to EPA from sources as of August 1, 2012. EPA will update as it receives and verifies data 2011 S02 2012 S02 Emissions Emissions 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 Facility Name State County Quarter (tons) (tons) Emissions (tons) Emissions (%) Shiras MI Marquette 1 51 72 22 43% Shiras MI Marquette 2 44 44 0 0% St. Clair MI Saint Clair 1 9,298 5,303 -3,995 -43% St. Clair MI Saint Clair 2 9,309 6,986 -2,323 -25% TES Filer City Station MI Manistee 1 187 168 -19 -10% TES Filer City Station MI Manistee 2 153 111 -42 -27% Trenton Channel MI Wayne 1 6,245 5,075 -1,169 -19% Trenton Channel MI Wayne 2 5,518 4,588 -930 -17% Wyandotte MI Wayne 1 203 152 -50 -25% Wyandotte MI Wayne 2 158 78 -80 -51% Allen S King MN Washington 1 434 421 -13 -3% Allen S King MN Washington 2 333 286 -47 -14% Black Dog MN Dakota 1 782 683 -100 -13% Black Dog MN Dakota 2 676 715 39 6% Boswell Energy Center MN Itasca 1 1,155 1,163 9 1% Boswell Energy Center MN Itasca 2 708 932 224 32% Hoot Lake MN Otter Tail 1 936 617 -318 -34% Hoot Lake MN Otter Tail 2 737 446 -291 -39% Laskin Energy Center MN Saint Louis 1 172 66 -105 -61% Laskin Energy Center MN Saint Louis 2 83 50 -32 -39% Northeast Station MN Mower 1 0 3 3 117345% Northeast Station MN Mower 2 14 0 -13 -97% Sherburne County MN Sherburne 1 6,052 2,491 -3,561 -59% Sherburne County MN Sherburne 2 5,197 1,990 -3,207 -62% Silver Lake MN Olmsted 1 0 0 0 1422% Silver Lake MN Olmsted 2 3 3 0 -2% Taconite Harbor Energy Center MN Cook 1 949 756 -192 -20% Taconite Harbor Energy Center MN Cook 2 895 727 -168 -19% Asbury MO Jasper 1 2,798 1,606 -1,191 -43% Asbury MO Jasper 2 2,332 1,541 -791 -34% 37 of 90 ------- 3nly) 2011 S02 2012 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2011 NOX 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 2011 NOX Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emissions Emissions NOX Emissions 2012 vs 2011 NOX Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (%) (tons) (tons) (tons) Emissions (%) (lb/mmBtu) 0.11 0.15 0.04 39% 69 80 11 15% 0.15 0.11 0.12 0.01 7% 59 70 11 18% 0.15 1.08 0.92 -0.17 -15% 2,172 1,483 -689 -32% 0.25 1.05 1.23 0.19 18% 2,261 1,386 -875 -39% 0.25 0.23 0.19 -0.04 -16% 323 308 -15 -5% 0.39 0.18 0.15 -0.04 -19% 333 288 -46 -14% 0.40 1.21 1.19 -0.02 -2% 1,302 1,146 -156 -12% 0.25 1.23 1.29 0.06 5% 1,351 845 -507 -37% 0.30 0.56 0.50 -0.05 -10% 80 67 -13 -16% 0.22 0.44 0.24 -0.20 -46% 73 70 -4 -5% 0.21 0.10 0.09 0.00 -4% 361 374 13 3% 0.08 0.10 0.10 0.00 -3% 279 251 -28 -10% 0.08 0.40 0.42 0.01 3% 1,505 1,333 -171 -11% 0.77 0.40 0.38 -0.02 -5% 1,323 1,502 179 14% 0.79 0.12 0.10 -0.01 -10% 1,217 1,301 84 7% 0.12 0.08 0.12 0.04 49% 1,017 812 -205 -20% 0.12 0.71 0.61 -0.10 -14% 253 186 -67 -27% 0.19 0.66 0.64 -0.02 -3% 188 149 -39 -21% 0.17 0.16 0.11 -0.05 -31% 185 101 -83 -45% 0.18 0.12 0.10 -0.02 -17% 127 92 -35 -27% 0.18 0.07 1.17 1.10 1677% 0 1 1 149353% 0.02 1.89 0.01 -1.87 -99% 4 10 5 119% 0.63 0.29 0.27 -0.02 -8% 3,434 1,674 -1,760 -51% 0.17 0.29 0.26 -0.04 -13% 2,940 1,436 -1,504 -51% 0.17 0.06 0.08 0.01 21% 0 0 0 10004% 0.02 0.23 0.41 0.18 79% 3 3 0 -14% 0.25 0.50 0.48 -0.02 -5% 420 338 -82 -20% 0.22 0.48 0.45 -0.02 -5% 418 337 -81 -19% 0.22 1.31 0.93 -0.37 -29% 307 302 -4 -1% 0.14 1.32 0.92 -0.41 -31% 261 314 54 21% 0.15 38 of 90 ------- 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 NOX 2012 vs 2011 2011 Heat 2012 Heat 2012 vs 2011 2012 vs 2011 Emission Rate Emission Rate NOX Emission Input Input Heat Input Heat Input (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) Rate (%) (mmBtu) (mmBtu) (mmBtu) (%) 0.17 0.02 12% 916,397 944,636 28,239 3% 0.19 0.04 26% 764,176 714,178 -49,998 -7% 0.26 0.00 1% 17,173,480 11,566,787 -5,606,693 -33% 0.24 -0.01 -4% 17,805,292 11,337,919 -6,467,373 -36% 0.35 -0.04 -11% 1,646,930 1,770,635 123,705 8% 0.38 -0.02 -4% 1,673,580 1,505,723 -167,857 -10% 0.27 0.02 6% 10,312,651 8,547,612 -1,765,038 -17% 0.24 -0.06 -21% 8,975,289 7,098,416 -1,876,873 -21% 0.22 0.00 1% 729,727 608,103 -121,624 -17% 0.22 0.01 4% 711,726 648,148 -63,578 -9% 0.08 0.00 3% 9,024,173 9,091,334 67,161 1% 0.09 0.00 2% 6,686,803 5,890,577 -796,226 -12% 0.81 0.04 5% 3,889,217 3,286,214 -603,003 -16% 0.80 0.02 2% 3,366,046 3,732,682 366,636 11% 0.12 -0.01 -5% 19,980,514 22,458,892 2,478,377 12% 0.11 -0.01 -10% 17,438,882 15,441,011 -1,997,871 -11% 0.18 -0.01 -4% 2,633,140 2,014,005 -619,135 -24% 0.21 0.04 27% 2,243,054 1,404,407 -838,647 -37% 0.17 0.00 -2% 2,106,331 1,175,690 -930,641 -44% 0.18 0.00 -1% 1,427,425 1,052,294 -375,132 -26% 0.44 0.42 2162% 89 5,859 5,770 6508% 0.33 -0.30 -48% 14,345 60,134 45,789 319% 0.18 0.01 9% 41,224,752 18,489,878 -22,734,874 -55% 0.18 0.02 10% 35,275,188 15,603,523 -19,671,665 -56% 0.14 0.12 703% 188 2,365 2,177 1158% 0.38 0.14 56% 23,728 13,032 -10,696 -45% 0.21 -0.01 -4% 3,776,250 3,164,787 -611,463 -16% 0.21 -0.01 -5% 3,767,447 3,204,283 -563,165 -15% 0.18 0.03 22% 4,284,018 3,447,962 -836,056 -20% 0.19 0.04 26% 3,529,309 3,364,702 -164,608 -5% 39 of 90 ------- 2011 vs 2012 S02 and NOx Comparisons, Quarterly Acid Rain Program and Clean Air Interstate Rule Emissions, Emission Rates, and Heat Input Changes at Facilities (Coal Units < 2011 data are final, 2012 are preliminary data submitted to EPA from sources as of August 1, 2012. EPA will update as it receives and verifies data 2011 S02 2012 S02 Emissions Emissions 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 Facility Name State County Quarter (tons) (tons) Emissions (tons) Emissions (%) Blue Valley MO Jackson 1 102 20 -82 -80% Blue Valley MO Jackson 2 391 408 17 4% Chamois Power Plant MO Osage 1 353 249 -104 -30% Chamois Power Plant MO Osage 2 292 98 -194 -66% Columbia MO Boone 1 435 190 -245 -56% Columbia MO Boone 2 188 Hawthorn MO Jackson 1 399 247 -152 -38% Hawthorn MO Jackson 2 453 390 -63 -14% Iatan MO Platte 1 71 182 111 157% Iatan MO Platte 2 84 132 49 58% James River MO Greene 1 635 172 -463 -73% James River MO Greene 2 714 271 -443 -62% John Twitty Energy Center MO Greene 1 2,086 269 -1,817 -87% John Twitty Energy Center MO Greene 2 1,279 723 -556 -43% Labadie MO Franklin 1 15,101 10,326 -4,775 -32% Labadie MO Franklin 2 13,907 9,359 -4,548 -33% Lake Road MO Buchanan 1 220 410 190 86% Lake Road MO Buchanan 2 416 320 -96 -23% Meramec MO Saint Louis 1 3,638 2,508 -1,130 -31% Meramec MO Saint Louis 2 3,886 2,761 -1,125 -29% Montrose MO Henry 1 2,934 1,898 -1,036 -35% Montrose MO Henry 2 2,955 1,386 -1,569 -53% New Madrid Power Plant MO New Madrid 1 4,461 3,299 -1,163 -26% New Madrid Power Plant MO New Madrid 2 3,059 3,083 24 1% Rush Island MO Jefferson 1 8,449 5,086 -3,362 -40% Rush Island MO Jefferson 2 4,871 5,109 238 5% Sibley MO Jackson 1 4,938 1,639 -3,299 -67% Sibley MO Jackson 2 3,247 1,529 -1,718 -53% Sikeston MO Scott 1 1,353 1,180 -173 -13% Sikeston MO Scott 2 1,497 825 -671 -45% 40 of 90 ------- 3nly) 2011 S02 2012 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2011 NOX 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 2011 NOX Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emissions Emissions NOX Emissions 2012 vs 2011 NOX Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (%) (tons) (tons) (tons) Emissions (%) (lb/mmBtu) 3.48 4.11 0.64 18% 7 1 -6 -82% 0.23 4.04 4.60 0.57 14% 23 26 3 13% 0.23 0.66 0.58 -0.09 -13% 500 383 -117 -23% 0.94 0.64 0.54 -0.10 -16% 400 166 -234 -59% 0.88 2.41 1.25 -1.16 -48% 76 76 0 0% 0.42 2.12 38 0.43 0.09 0.08 -0.02 -20% 304 236 -68 -22% 0.07 0.10 0.09 -0.01 -10% 348 320 -28 -8% 0.07 0.01 0.01 0.01 99% 702 871 169 24% 0.06 0.01 0.01 0.00 34% 602 814 212 35% 0.05 0.53 0.40 -0.14 -25% 279 80 -199 -71% 0.23 0.62 0.28 -0.34 -55% 261 153 -107 -41% 0.23 0.60 0.15 -0.45 -76% 438 133 -305 -70% 0.13 0.34 0.39 0.05 14% 307 152 -154 -50% 0.08 0.62 0.58 -0.04 -7% 2,548 1,880 -668 -26% 0.10 0.59 0.60 0.01 2% 2,458 1,574 -885 -36% 0.10 0.50 0.56 0.06 12% 278 499 221 80% 0.63 0.58 0.53 -0.05 -9% 453 402 -51 -11% 0.63 0.49 0.44 -0.05 -9% 1,202 826 -375 -31% 0.16 0.51 0.42 -0.08 -17% 1,196 984 -212 -18% 0.16 0.75 0.60 -0.15 -20% 1,337 960 -377 -28% 0.34 0.83 0.62 -0.21 -25% 1,163 581 -582 -50% 0.33 0.42 0.40 -0.02 -6% 1,005 3,798 2,793 278% 0.10 0.43 0.31 -0.12 -28% 728 4,472 3,744 514% 0.10 0.72 0.58 -0.13 -19% 1,001 717 -284 -28% 0.08 0.67 0.52 -0.15 -22% 614 782 168 27% 0.09 1.20 0.60 -0.61 -50% 905 327 -577 -64% 0.22 1.35 0.52 -0.83 -61% 591 524 -67 -11% 0.25 0.59 0.68 0.09 16% 488 414 -74 -15% 0.21 0.59 0.62 0.03 5% 543 307 -236 -44% 0.21 41 of 90 ------- 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 NOX 2012 vs 2011 2011 Heat 2012 Heat 2012 vs 2011 2012 vs 2011 Emission Rate Emission Rate NOX Emission Input Input Heat Input Heat Input (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) Rate (%) (mmBtu) (mmBtu) (mmBtu) (%) 0.24 0.01 6% 58,640 9,891 -48,750 -83% 0.29 0.06 24% 193,920 177,252 -16,668 -9% 0.89 -0.05 -6% 1,065,235 865,103 -200,133 -19% 0.91 0.03 3% 913,003 366,775 -546,229 -60% 0.50 0.08 19% 360,792 177,264 302,760 -58,032 -16% 0.07 0.00 0% 8,411,099 6,505,394 -1,905,704 -23% 0.07 0.00 -3% 9,509,628 9,067,328 -442,300 -5% 0.06 0.00 -4% 23,152,727 29,948,793 6,796,067 29% 0.06 0.01 15% 23,990,400 28,286,339 4,295,939 18% 0.18 -0.05 -21% 2,378,393 864,191 -1,514,203 -64% 0.16 -0.07 -29% 2,293,257 1,911,112 -382,144 -17% 0.07 -0.05 -43% 6,941,333 3,683,939 -3,257,394 -47% 0.08 0.00 0% 7,492,884 3,719,117 -3,773,767 -50% 0.11 0.00 1% 48,672,782 35,649,760 -13,023,022 -27% 0.10 0.00 -3% 47,415,773 31,368,412 -16,047,361 -34% 0.68 0.05 7% 875,759 1,464,319 588,560 67% 0.67 0.04 6% 1,433,247 1,206,060 -227,187 -16% 0.15 -0.02 -9% 14,899,674 11,317,557 -3,582,116 -24% 0.15 -0.01 -4% 15,337,674 13,089,700 -2,247,974 -15% 0.30 -0.04 -11% 7,830,084 6,310,382 -1,519,702 -19% 0.26 -0.06 -20% 7,134,048 4,447,553 -2,686,495 -38% 0.46 0.36 382% 21,105,726 16,533,614 -4,572,112 -22% 0.45 0.35 340% 14,094,290 19,672,857 5,578,566 40% 0.08 0.00 -3% 23,625,110 17,484,229 -6,140,881 -26% 0.08 0.00 -6% 14,435,920 19,514,982 5,079,062 35% 0.12 -0.10 -46% 8,196,952 5,485,829 -2,711,123 -33% 0.18 -0.07 -27% 4,804,423 5,869,089 1,064,666 22% 0.24 0.03 12% 4,609,925 3,475,412 -1,134,513 -25% 0.23 0.02 8% 5,111,385 2,674,956 -2,436,429 -48% 42 of 90 ------- 2011 vs 2012 S02 and NOx Comparisons, Quarterly Acid Rain Program and Clean Air Interstate Rule Emissions, Emission Rates, and Heat Input Changes at Facilities (Coal Units < 2011 data are final, 2012 are preliminary data submitted to EPA from sources as of August 1, 2012. EPA will update as it receives and verifies data 2011 S02 2012 S02 Emissions Emissions 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 Facility Name State County Quarter (tons) (tons) Emissions (tons) Emissions (%) Sioux MO Saint Charles 1 75 848 773 1034% Sioux MO Saint Charles 2 919 581 -338 -37% Thomas Hill Energy Center MO Randolph 1 4,584 3,638 -946 -21% Thomas Hill Energy Center MO Randolph 2 4,759 2,595 -2,164 -45% Daniel Electric Generating Plant MS Jackson 1 2,128 1,554 -575 -27% Daniel Electric Generating Plant MS Jackson 2 3,706 2,680 -1,026 -28% R D Morrow Senior Generating Plant MS Lamar 1 1,155 284 -872 -75% R D Morrow Senior Generating Plant MS Lamar 2 749 865 116 15% Red Hills Generation Facility MS Choctaw 1 435 563 127 29% Red Hills Generation Facility MS Choctaw 2 488 706 218 45% Watson Electric Generating Plant MS Harrison 1 6,812 3,168 -3,643 -53% Watson Electric Generating Plant MS Harrison 2 6,947 5,640 -1,307 -19% Colstrip MT Rosebud 1 3,242 3,009 -233 -7% Colstrip MT Rosebud 2 1,248 720 -528 -42% Hardin Generating Station MT Big Horn 1 102 97 -5 -5% Hardin Generating Station MT Big Horn 2 45 J E Corette MT Yellowstone 1 609 582 -27 -4% J E Corette MT Yellowstone 2 237 Lewis & Clark MT Richland 1 272 227 -45 -17% Lewis & Clark MT Richland 2 98 73 -25 -25% Asheville NC Buncombe 1 711 771 60 8% Asheville NC Buncombe 2 657 543 -114 -17% Belews Creek NC Stokes 1 776 836 60 8% Belews Creek NC Stokes 2 783 1,117 335 43% Buck NC Rowan 1 923 116 -808 -87% Buck NC Rowan 2 1,346 274 -1,072 -80% Cape Fear NC Chatham 1 2,996 486 -2,511 -84% Cape Fear NC Chatham 2 1,725 570 -1,155 -67% Cliffside NC Cleveland 1 26 32 6 25% Cliffside NC Cleveland 2 143 36 -108 -75% 43 of 90 ------- 3nly) 2011 S02 2012 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2011 NOX 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 2011 NOX Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emissions Emissions NOX Emissions 2012 vs 2011 NOX Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (%) (tons) (tons) (tons) Emissions (%) (lb/mmBtu) 0.01 0.12 0.11 990% 1,862 1,782 -80 -4% 0.28 0.16 0.11 -0.05 -31% 1,734 1,356 -378 -22% 0.30 0.42 0.41 0.00 -1% 2,611 1,964 -647 -25% 0.24 0.42 0.40 -0.02 -5% 2,304 2,983 679 29% 0.20 0.60 0.70 0.10 16% 756 515 -241 -32% 0.21 0.64 0.74 0.11 16% 1,253 1,091 -162 -13% 0.22 0.61 0.45 -0.16 -26% 880 255 -625 -71% 0.46 0.27 0.54 0.27 102% 1,349 732 -617 -46% 0.48 0.15 0.13 -0.03 -17% 349 457 108 31% 0.12 0.16 0.19 0.03 19% 420 399 -20 -5% 0.14 2.20 2.03 -0.17 -8% 1,163 592 -572 -49% 0.38 1.84 1.55 -0.29 -16% 1,443 1,310 -133 -9% 0.38 0.16 0.15 -0.02 -12% 4,156 4,325 169 4% 0.21 0.15 0.09 -0.05 -37% 1,869 1,309 -561 -30% 0.22 0.10 0.10 0.00 2% 87 81 -6 -7% 0.08 0.10 36 0.08 0.48 0.48 0.00 0% 340 327 -13 -4% 0.27 0.49 129 0.27 0.54 0.52 -0.02 -4% 196 173 -24 -12% 0.39 0.26 0.45 0.19 73% 141 65 -76 -54% 0.37 0.26 0.34 0.08 31% 344 272 -73 -21% 0.13 0.32 0.18 -0.14 -43% 187 240 54 29% 0.09 0.04 0.06 0.01 33% 812 1,068 256 32% 0.04 0.05 0.07 0.02 40% 984 1,384 401 41% 0.06 1.19 1.20 0.00 0% 158 19 -139 -88% 0.20 1.19 1.21 0.02 1% 218 40 -178 -81% 0.19 1.41 1.47 0.06 4% 1,021 110 -911 -89% 0.48 1.45 1.51 0.05 4% 423 99 -324 -77% 0.36 0.01 0.04 0.03 299% 157 50 -107 -68% 0.06 0.03 0.02 -0.01 -23% 252 134 -118 -47% 0.05 44 of 90 ------- 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 NOX 2012 vs 2011 2011 Heat 2012 Heat 2012 vs 2011 2012 vs 2011 Emission Rate Emission Rate NOX Emission Input Input Heat Input Heat Input (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) Rate (%) (mmBtu) (mmBtu) (mmBtu) (%) 0.25 -0.02 -8% 13,526,537 14,062,457 535,920 4% 0.25 -0.04 -14% 11,702,177 10,679,224 -1,022,954 -9% 0.22 -0.01 -6% 22,002,801 17,558,010 -4,444,792 -20% 0.46 0.26 127% 22,759,009 12,997,440 -9,761,569 -43% 0.23 0.02 8% 7,083,818 4,453,442 -2,630,376 -37% 0.30 0.09 40% 11,602,641 7,203,250 -4,399,391 -38% 0.41 -0.06 -12% 3,802,477 1,254,148 -2,548,329 -67% 0.46 -0.03 -5% 5,609,453 3,213,303 -2,396,150 -43% 0.10 -0.02 -16% 5,755,679 8,987,192 3,231,513 56% 0.11 -0.03 -22% 6,110,753 7,417,745 1,306,992 21% 0.38 0.00 1% 6,186,015 3,115,317 -3,070,698 -50% 0.36 -0.02 -6% 7,555,502 7,278,012 -277,490 -4% 0.21 0.00 -1% 39,369,762 41,497,389 2,127,627 5% 0.17 -0.05 -23% 17,215,920 15,639,680 -1,576,240 -9% 0.08 0.00 0% 2,102,556 1,966,008 -136,548 -6% 902,300 0.27 0.00 1% 2,559,941 2,447,678 -112,263 -4% 958,044 0.39 0.01 1% 1,013,013 879,381 -133,632 -13% 0.40 0.03 7% 756,077 326,844 -429,233 -57% 0.12 -0.01 -5% 5,483,371 4,538,489 -944,882 -17% 0.08 -0.01 -11% 4,143,209 6,013,063 1,869,854 45% 0.07 0.03 63% 36,616,391 29,645,373 -6,971,018 -19% 0.08 0.02 38% 33,228,934 33,836,943 608,010 2% 0.20 -0.01 -3% 1,546,125 192,760 -1,353,365 -88% 0.18 -0.02 -8% 2,262,577 454,721 -1,807,857 -80% 0.33 -0.15 -31% 4,249,763 659,877 -3,589,886 -84% 0.26 -0.09 -26% 2,371,232 755,207 -1,616,025 -68% 0.06 0.00 3% 4,966,826 1,550,786 -3,416,040 -69% 0.09 0.04 64% 9,214,202 2,993,558 -6,220,644 -68% 45 of 90 ------- 2011 vs 2012 S02 and NOx Comparisons, Quarterly Acid Rain Program and Clean Air Interstate Rule Emissions, Emission Rates, and Heat Input Changes at Facilities (Coal Units < 2011 data are final, 2012 are preliminary data submitted to EPA from sources as of August 1, 2012. EPA will update as it receives and verifies data 2011 S02 2012 S02 Emissions Emissions 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 Facility Name State County Quarter (tons) (tons) Emissions (tons) Emissions (%) CPI USA North Carolina Roxboro NC Person 1 234 263 29 12% CPI USA North Carolina Roxboro NC Person 2 214 272 58 27% CPI USA North Carolina Southport NC Brunswick 1 421 732 311 74% CPI USA North Carolina Southport NC Brunswick 2 579 768 189 33% Dan River NC Rockingham 1 442 Dan River NC Rockingham 2 810 Edgecombe Genco, LLC NC Edgecombe 1 88 32 -56 -63% Edgecombe Genco, LLC NC Edgecombe 2 80 22 -59 -73% Elizabethtown Power NC Bladen 1 Elizabethtown Power NC Bladen 2 G G Allen NC Gaston 1 391 56 -335 -86% G G Allen NC Gaston 2 473 161 -312 -66% H F Lee Steam Electric Plant NC Wayne 1 3,673 1,474 -2,199 -60% H F Lee Steam Electric Plant NC Wayne 2 1,475 2,246 771 52% L V Sutton NC New Hanover 1 4,279 2,810 -1,469 -34% L V Sutton NC New Hanover 2 3,647 3,432 -216 -6% Lumberton Power NC Robeson 1 Lumberton Power NC Robeson 2 Marshall NC Catawba 1 760 746 -14 -2% Marshall NC Catawba 2 1,114 846 -268 -24% Mayo NC Person 1 1,851 1,405 -445 -24% Mayo NC Person 2 2,081 1,366 -715 -34% Riverbend NC Gaston 1 1,404 233 -1,171 -83% Riverbend NC Gaston 2 2,762 78 -2,685 -97% Roxboro NC Person 1 2,513 2,789 276 11% Roxboro NC Person 2 2,456 2,947 491 20% W H Weatherspoon NC Robeson 1 813 W H Weatherspoon NC Robeson 2 435 Westmoreland Partners Roanoke Valley I NC Halifax 1 137 160 22 16% Westmoreland Partners Roanoke Valley I NC Halifax 2 142 100 -42 -30% 46 of 90 ------- 3nly) 2011 S02 2012 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2011 NOX Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emissions (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (%) (tons) 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 Emissions NOX Emissions (tons) (tons) 2011 NOX 2012 vs 2011 NOX Emission Rate Emissions (%) (lb/mmBtu) 0.70 0.58 -0.12 -18% 67 99 32 47% 0.20 0.78 0.55 -0.24 -30% 58 112 54 93% 0.21 0.62 0.71 0.09 15% 188 248 60 32% 0.28 0.81 0.71 -0.10 -12% 189 238 48 26% 0.26 1.20 100 0.27 1.26 238 0.37 0.10 0.07 -0.03 -26% 403 218 -185 -46% 0.44 0.09 0.05 -0.03 -37% 427 205 -222 -52% 0.46 0.07 0.05 -0.01 -22% 1,129 266 -863 -76% 0.19 0.07 0.05 -0.02 -36% 1,346 826 -520 -39% 0.20 1.42 1.48 0.06 4% 998 352 -646 -65% 0.39 1.40 1.46 0.06 4% 424 546 123 29% 0.40 1.47 1.37 -0.10 -7% 1,365 919 -445 -33% 0.47 1.43 1.42 -0.01 -1% 1,133 1,095 -38 -3% 0.44 0.05 0.08 0.02 44% 2,097 2,054 -43 -2% 0.15 0.07 0.08 0.01 17% 2,734 2,056 -678 -25% 0.17 0.32 0.30 -0.02 -8% 383 458 75 20% 0.07 0.42 0.40 -0.02 -4% 367 594 226 62% 0.07 1.52 1.57 0.05 3% 222 36 -185 -84% 0.24 1.49 1.47 -0.02 -2% 445 11 -434 -97% 0.24 0.17 0.16 -0.01 -4% 1,677 2,185 508 30% 0.11 0.17 0.18 0.01 8% 1,440 2,835 1,395 97% 0.10 1.61 317 0.63 1.62 160 0.59 0.09 0.12 0.03 29% 454 406 -48 -11% 0.30 0.10 0.11 0.01 6% 417 263 -154 -37% 0.31 47 of 90 ------- 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 NOX 2012 vs 2011 2011 Heat 2012 Heat 2012 vs 2011 2012 vs 2011 Emission Rate Emission Rate NOX Emission Input Input Heat Input Heat Input (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) Rate (%) (mmBtu) (mmBtu) (mmBtu) (%) 0.22 0.02 8% 668,017 911,706 243,690 36% 0.22 0.01 6% 546,805 998,920 452,115 83% 0.24 -0.04 -13% 1,354,626 2,052,142 697,516 51% 0.22 -0.04 -17% 1,433,456 2,157,986 724,530 51% 740,114 1,288,107 0.47 0.04 9% 1,847,148 919,928 -927,220 -50% 0.51 0.05 11% 1,850,344 802,319 -1,048,025 -57% 0.25 0.06 29% 11,912,328 2,170,771 -9,741,557 -82% 0.23 0.03 16% 13,513,784 7,138,757 -6,375,026 -47% 0.35 -0.03 -8% 5,174,759 1,988,204 -3,186,556 -62% 0.36 -0.05 -12% 2,106,224 3,075,317 969,092 46% 0.45 -0.02 -4% 5,818,979 4,101,842 -1,717,136 -30% 0.45 0.01 2% 5,092,972 4,818,851 -274,121 -5% 0.21 0.06 43% 28,542,349 19,513,413 -9,028,937 -32% 0.20 0.03 16% 32,116,692 20,907,851 -11,208,841 -35% 0.10 0.03 46% 11,411,075 9,381,205 -2,029,870 -18% 0.17 0.10 137% 10,003,994 6,827,845 -3,176,148 -32% 0.25 0.01 3% 1,852,825 297,128 -1,555,697 -84% 0.21 -0.03 -11% 3,703,905 106,011 -3,597,894 -97% 0.13 0.01 13% 30,075,090 34,822,280 4,747,190 16% 0.18 0.08 77% 28,719,054 31,952,797 3,233,742 11% 1,009,504 537,753 0.30 0.00 -1% 3,008,930 2,724,723 -284,207 -9% 0.29 -0.01 -5% 2,717,856 1,802,414 -915,441 -34% 48 of 90 ------- 2011 vs 2012 S02 and NOx Comparisons, Quarterly Acid Rain Program and Clean Air Interstate Rule Emissions, Emission Rates, and Heat Input Changes at Facilities (Coal Units < 2011 data are final, 2012 are preliminary data submitted to EPA from sources as of August 1, 2012. EPA will update as it receives and verifies data 2011 S02 2012 S02 Emissions Emissions 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 Facility Name State County Quarter (tons) (tons) Emissions (tons) Emissions (%) Westmoreland Partners Roanoke Valley II NC Halifax 1 39 36 -3 -8% Westmoreland Partners Roanoke Valley II NC Halifax 2 42 44 2 5% Antelope Valley ND Mercer 1 3,748 3,563 -185 -5% Antelope Valley ND Mercer 2 3,375 3,425 50 1% Coal Creek ND McLean 1 3,938 3,972 34 1% Coal Creek ND McLean 2 3,025 3,796 771 25% Coyote ND Mercer 1 3,817 3,552 -265 -7% Coyote ND Mercer 2 2,754 1,965 -789 -29% Leland Olds ND Mercer 1 13,044 12,200 -844 -6% Leland Olds ND Mercer 2 4,633 11,170 6,538 141% Milton R Young ND Oliver 1 4,223 518 -3,706 -88% Milton R Young ND Oliver 2 513 554 41 8% R M Heskett ND Morton 1 579 355 -225 -39% R M Heskett ND Morton 2 361 452 91 25% Stanton ND Mercer 1 654 615 -39 -6% Stanton ND Mercer 2 505 516 11 2% Gerald Gentleman Station NE Lincoln 1 8,141 7,126 -1,014 -12% Gerald Gentleman Station NE Lincoln 2 5,928 4,528 -1,400 -24% Gerald Whelan Energy Center NE Adams 1 735 552 -183 -25% Gerald Whelan Energy Center NE Adams 2 690 623 -67 -10% Lon D Wright Power Plant NE Dodge 1 320 238 -82 -25% Lon D Wright Power Plant NE Dodge 2 279 239 -40 -14% Nebraska City Station NE Otoe 1 3,924 4,865 941 24% Nebraska City Station NE Otoe 2 4,403 3,134 -1,269 -29% North Omaha Station NE Douglas 1 2,780 2,910 130 5% North Omaha Station NE Douglas 2 3,868 3,185 -683 -18% Platte NE Hall 1 633 479 -154 -24% Platte NE Hall 2 554 495 -59 -11% Sheldon NE Lancaster 1 1,080 593 -487 -45% Sheldon NE Lancaster 2 1,062 610 -453 -43% 49 of 90 ------- 3nly) 2011 S02 2012 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2011 NOX 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 2011 NOX Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emissions Emissions NOX Emissions 2012 vs 2011 NOX Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (%) (tons) (tons) (tons) Emissions (%) (lb/mmBtu) 0.10 0.10 0.00 1% 66 59 -6 -9% 0.17 0.09 0.09 0.00 -3% 78 85 7 9% 0.17 0.39 0.38 0.00 0% 3,568 3,313 -255 -7% 0.37 0.46 0.45 -0.01 -2% 2,525 2,699 174 7% 0.34 0.32 0.33 0.00 0% 2,058 2,219 161 8% 0.17 0.35 0.34 0.00 -1% 1,439 1,948 510 35% 0.16 0.81 0.76 -0.04 -5% 3,584 3,553 -31 -1% 0.76 0.69 0.90 0.21 31% 2,949 1,632 -1,317 -45% 0.74 2.09 2.43 0.33 16% 1,797 1,394 -404 -22% 0.29 2.33 2.31 -0.02 -1% 563 1,359 796 141% 0.28 0.51 0.07 -0.44 -86% 3,223 2,330 -894 -28% 0.39 0.07 0.08 0.01 20% 2,920 2,256 -664 -23% 0.39 0.91 0.61 -0.29 -32% 271 255 -16 -6% 0.42 0.78 0.78 -0.01 -1% 171 252 81 47% 0.37 0.36 0.36 0.00 0% 480 454 -26 -5% 0.26 0.33 0.33 0.00 -1% 426 431 5 1% 0.28 0.61 0.58 -0.03 -4% 3,718 3,401 -317 -9% 0.28 0.61 0.60 -0.01 -2% 2,717 1,644 -1,074 -40% 0.28 0.75 0.43 -0.32 -43% 298 198 -100 -34% 0.30 0.39 0.39 0.01 1% 325 233 -92 -28% 0.18 0.52 0.50 -0.02 -4% 121 92 -29 -24% 0.20 0.51 0.48 -0.04 -7% 113 102 -11 -10% 0.21 0.39 0.41 0.03 7% 1,328 1,587 259 20% 0.13 0.39 0.31 -0.07 -19% 1,661 1,185 -475 -29% 0.15 0.69 0.68 -0.01 -1% 1,303 1,393 90 7% 0.33 0.75 0.65 -0.09 -12% 1,827 1,514 -313 -17% 0.35 0.67 0.64 -0.03 -5% 329 257 -72 -22% 0.35 0.67 0.65 -0.03 -4% 288 266 -21 -7% 0.35 0.48 0.46 -0.02 -4% 1,903 544 -1,359 -71% 0.85 0.50 0.46 -0.03 -6% 1,769 707 -1,063 -60% 0.82 50 of 90 ------- 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 NOX 2012 vs 2011 2011 Heat 2012 Heat 2012 vs 2011 2012 vs 2011 Emission Rate Emission Rate NOX Emission Input Input Heat Input Heat Input (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) Rate (%) (mmBtu) (mmBtu) (mmBtu) (%) 0.16 0.00 0% 793,389 722,012 -71,376 -9% 0.17 0.00 0% 948,046 1,033,736 85,689 9% 0.36 -0.01 -3% 19,446,197 18,551,839 -894,357 -5% 0.36 0.01 3% 14,638,405 15,202,485 564,080 4% 0.18 0.01 7% 24,278,076 24,423,455 145,379 1% 0.18 0.01 7% 17,437,633 22,166,464 4,728,831 27% 0.76 0.01 1% 9,477,424 9,317,430 -159,994 -2% 0.75 0.01 2% 8,023,669 4,365,883 -3,657,786 -46% 0.28 -0.01 -4% 12,462,272 10,060,261 -2,402,011 -19% 0.28 0.00 -1% 3,977,677 9,677,489 5,699,812 143% 0.33 -0.06 -15% 16,563,481 14,104,809 -2,458,672 -15% 0.33 -0.05 -14% 15,087,423 13,549,597 -1,537,826 -10% 0.44 0.02 4% 1,278,451 1,157,318 -121,132 -9% 0.43 0.06 17% 923,201 1,162,540 239,339 26% 0.26 0.00 1% 3,654,610 3,433,173 -221,437 -6% 0.27 0.00 -2% 3,049,828 3,137,172 87,344 3% 0.28 0.00 0% 26,647,188 24,417,214 -2,229,974 -8% 0.22 -0.06 -22% 19,490,138 15,157,232 -4,332,906 -22% 0.15 -0.15 -49% 1,972,107 2,584,912 612,805 31% 0.15 -0.04 -20% 3,549,462 3,161,081 -388,382 -11% 0.19 0.00 -2% 1,233,244 954,364 -278,881 -23% 0.20 0.00 -2% 1,092,720 1,006,150 -86,570 -8% 0.13 0.00 3% 20,236,537 23,557,827 3,321,290 16% 0.12 -0.03 -19% 22,852,606 20,144,979 -2,707,627 -12% 0.33 0.00 1% 8,017,994 8,518,211 500,217 6% 0.31 -0.04 -12% 10,384,081 9,746,536 -637,545 -6% 0.34 -0.01 -2% 1,894,297 1,507,814 -386,483 -20% 0.35 0.00 -1% 1,641,527 1,533,620 -107,906 -7% 0.43 -0.42 -50% 4,484,690 2,560,198 -1,924,492 -43% 0.54 -0.29 -35% 4,291,789 2,626,404 -1,665,385 -39% 51 of 90 ------- 2011 vs 2012 S02 and NOx Comparisons, Quarterly Acid Rain Program and Clean Air Interstate Rule Emissions, Emission Rates, and Heat Input Changes at Facilities (Coal Units < 2011 data are final, 2012 are preliminary data submitted to EPA from sources as of August 1, 2012. EPA will update as it receives and verifies data 2011 S02 2012 S02 Emissions Emissions 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 Facility Name State County Quarter (tons) (tons) Emissions (tons) Emissions (%) Merrimack NH Merrimack 1 10,540 Merrimack NH Merrimack 2 5,038 Schiller NH Rockingham 1 899 106 -793 -88% Schiller NH Rockingham 2 485 98 -387 -80% B L England NJ Cape May 1 37 7 -30 -81% B L England NJ Cape May 2 173 200 27 16% Carneys Point NJ Salem 1 310 279 -31 -10% Carneys Point NJ Salem 2 312 268 -45 -14% Deepwater NJ Salem 1 0 Deepwater NJ Salem 2 0 0 0 -98% Hudson Generating Station NJ Hudson 1 289 21 -268 -93% Hudson Generating Station NJ Hudson 2 405 1 -404 -100% Logan Generating Plant NJ Gloucester 1 179 108 -71 -39% Logan Generating Plant NJ Gloucester 2 151 111 -39 -26% Mercer Generating Station NJ Mercer 1 214 14 -200 -93% Mercer Generating Station NJ Mercer 2 112 28 -84 -75% Escalante NM McKinley 1 330 88 -242 -73% Escalante NM McKinley 2 296 195 -100 -34% Four Corners Steam Elec Station NM San Juan 1 3,563 3,149 -413 -12% Four Corners Steam Elec Station NM San Juan 2 2,523 1,898 -625 -25% San Juan NM San Juan 1 1,062 869 -193 -18% San Juan NM San Juan 2 1,128 1,105 -23 -2% North Valmy NV Humboldt 1 1,022 217 -804 -79% North Valmy NV Humboldt 2 260 440 180 69% Reid Gardner NV Clark 1 153 107 -46 -30% Reid Gardner NV Clark 2 374 33 -342 -91% TS Power Plant NV Eureka 1 61 63 2 4% TS Power Plant NV Eureka 2 48 36 -12 -26% AES Greenidge NY Yates 1 80 AES Greenidge NY Yates 2 52 of 90 ------- 3nly) 2011 S02 2012 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2011 NOX 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 2011 NOX Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emissions Emissions NOX Emissions 2012 vs 2011 NOX Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (%) (tons) (tons) (tons) Emissions (%) (lb/mmBtu) 2.47 1,115 0.26 2.25 604 0.27 0.61 0.15 -0.47 -76% 287 69 -218 -76% 0.20 0.65 0.14 -0.51 -78% 145 63 -82 -56% 0.19 0.13 0.15 0.02 17% 120 19 -101 -84% 0.42 0.86 1.53 0.67 78% 81 53 -28 -34% 0.40 0.19 0.21 0.01 6% 211 188 -22 -11% 0.13 0.20 0.21 0.01 5% 200 181 -19 -9% 0.13 0.00 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 -99% 9 26 17 197% 0.21 0.11 0.05 -0.06 -56% 217 34 -182 -84% 0.08 0.11 0.00 -0.11 -99% 301 140 -161 -53% 0.08 0.12 0.12 0.00 -2% 187 114 -73 -39% 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.00 3% 157 113 -44 -28% 0.13 0.12 0.13 0.01 8% 151 9 -142 -94% 0.09 0.12 0.07 -0.05 -40% 84 33 -50 -60% 0.09 0.13 0.11 -0.02 -13% 835 260 -574 -69% 0.34 0.12 0.13 0.00 3% 813 541 -272 -33% 0.33 0.19 0.17 -0.02 -10% 9,857 9,705 -153 -2% 0.54 0.15 0.14 -0.02 -10% 9,237 7,545 -1,692 -18% 0.56 0.07 0.07 0.00 -5% 4,033 3,416 -617 -15% 0.28 0.08 0.08 0.00 -1% 4,089 3,904 -185 -5% 0.28 0.38 0.17 -0.20 -54% 879 346 -534 -61% 0.33 0.19 0.71 0.52 273% 384 204 -180 -47% 0.28 0.09 0.10 0.01 15% 412 239 -173 -42% 0.23 0.12 0.06 -0.06 -51% 725 119 -606 -84% 0.23 0.04 0.04 0.00 13% 74 73 -1 -1% 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.01 24% 53 34 -19 -36% 0.04 0.15 134 0.24 53 of 90 ------- 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 NOX 2012 vs 2011 Emission Rate Emission Rate NOX Emission (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) Rate (%) 2011 Heat Input (mmBtu) 2012 Heat Input (mmBtu) 2012 vs 2011 Heat Input (mmBtu) 2012 vs 2011 Heat Input (%) 8,518,122 4,480,774 0.10 -0.10 -51% 2,926,490 1,447,823 -1,478,667 -51% 0.09 -0.10 -53% 1,500,576 1,397,714 -102,862 -7% 0.41 -0.01 -2% 576,097 91,527 -484,569 -84% 0.41 0.00 1% 401,825 261,965 -139,860 -35% 0.14 0.01 5% 3,198,049 2,716,546 -481,503 -15% 0.14 0.01 11% 3,170,936 2,578,281 -592,655 -19% 0.23 34,907 0.21 0.00 -2% 81,291 245,220 163,929 202% 0.08 0.00 -6% 5,427,637 914,951 -4,512,686 -83% 0.08 0.00 -2% 7,627,729 3,637,180 -3,990,549 -52% 0.13 0.00 -2% 2,882,071 1,777,983 -1,104,089 -38% 0.13 0.00 0% 2,368,222 1,702,555 -665,667 -28% 0.09 0.00 0% 3,497,226 217,091 -3,280,135 -94% 0.08 0.00 -5% 1,907,863 799,552 -1,108,311 -58% 0.34 0.00 1% 4,973,282 1,536,172 -3,437,110 -69% 0.35 0.01 4% 4,861,920 3,115,534 -1,746,386 -36% 0.54 0.00 0% 36,568,542 36,116,124 -452,417 -1% 0.54 -0.01 -2% 33,243,089 27,796,006 -5,447,083 -16% 0.27 -0.01 -2% 29,129,164 25,230,837 -3,898,327 -13% 0.27 -0.01 -3% 28,950,738 28,552,204 -398,534 -1% 0.28 -0.05 -15% 5,396,331 2,500,957 -2,895,374 -54% 0.33 0.05 17% 2,739,551 1,241,062 -1,498,489 -55% 0.22 -0.01 -5% 3,552,532 2,161,225 -1,391,306 -39% 0.21 -0.02 -8% 6,225,476 1,114,001 -5,111,476 -82% 0.05 0.00 8% 3,412,616 3,129,170 -283,446 -8% 0.04 0.00 6% 2,687,566 1,610,442 -1,077,124 -40% 1,104,780 54 of 90 ------- 2011 vs 2012 S02 and NOx Comparisons, Quarterly Acid Rain Program and Clean Air Interstate Rule Emissions, Emission Rates, and Heat Input Changes at Facilities (Coal Units < 2011 data are final, 2012 are preliminary data submitted to EPA from sources as of August 1, 2012. EPA will update as it receives and verifies data 2011 S02 2012 S02 Emissions Emissions 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 Facility Name State County Quarter (tons) (tons) Emissions (tons) Emissions (%) AES Westover (Goudey) NY Broome 1 21 AES Westover (Goudey) NY Broome 2 Black River Generation, LLC NY Jefferson 1 Black River Generation, LLC NY Jefferson 2 Cayuga Operating Company, LLC NY Tompkins 1 4,505 287 -4,218 -94% Cayuga Operating Company, LLC NY Tompkins 2 2,728 181 -2,548 -93% Dynegy Danskammer NY Orange 1 1,998 330 -1,668 -83% Dynegy Danskammer NY Orange 2 652 266 -386 -59% Huntley Power NY Erie 1 1,445 743 -702 -49% Huntley Power NY Erie 2 1,073 651 -422 -39% Niagara Generation, LLC NY Niagara 1 33 Niagara Generation, LLC NY Niagara 2 78 NRG Dunkirk Power NY Chautauqua 1 1,749 513 -1,236 -71% NRG Dunkirk Power NY Chautauqua 2 1,397 446 -951 -68% S A Carlson NY Chautauqua 1 635 204 -431 -68% S A Carlson NY Chautauqua 2 14 Somerset Operating Company (Kintigh) NY Niagara 1 2,944 1,173 -1,771 -60% Somerset Operating Company (Kintigh) NY Niagara 2 2,719 61 -2,658 -98% Syracuse Energy Corporation NY Onondaga 1 526 495 -32 -6% Syracuse Energy Corporation NY Onondaga 2 441 487 46 10% Ashtabula OH Ashtabula 1 1,182 8 -1,174 -99% Ashtabula OH Ashtabula 2 775 849 74 10% Avon Lake Power Plant OH Lorain 1 5,318 8,371 3,053 57% Avon Lake Power Plant OH Lorain 2 3,414 4,489 1,075 31% Bay Shore OH Lucas 1 4,018 833 -3,185 -79% Bay Shore OH Lucas 2 1,709 870 -839 -49% Cardinal OH Jefferson 1 8,499 1,062 -7,438 -88% Cardinal OH Jefferson 2 8,000 1,593 -6,407 -80% Conesville OH Coshocton 1 3,639 2,894 -745 -20% Conesville OH Coshocton 2 1,849 3,515 1,666 90% 55 Of 90 ------- 3nly) 2011 S02 2012 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2011 NOX Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emissions (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (%) (tons) 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 Emissions NOX Emissions (tons) (tons) 2011 NOX 2012 vs 2011 NOX Emission Rate Emissions (%) (lb/mmBtu) 0.35 12 0.21 1.82 0.41 -1.42 -78% 804 208 -596 -74% 0.33 1.93 1.39 -0.54 -28% 445 30 -415 -93% 0.31 0.99 0.96 -0.04 -4% 510 89 -421 -83% 0.25 0.91 0.93 0.02 2% 181 70 -111 -62% 0.25 0.54 0.67 0.13 25% 413 175 -238 -58% 0.15 0.58 0.72 0.14 23% 300 118 -181 -60% 0.16 0.61 8 0.44 31 0.51 0.64 0.12 24% 546 139 -407 -74% 0.16 0.56 0.71 0.16 28% 404 105 -300 -74% 0.16 2.97 2.61 -0.36 -12% 87 31 -56 -65% 0.41 2.68 2 0.38 0.54 0.54 0.00 0% 1,505 800 -705 -47% 0.27 0.55 0.49 -0.06 -11% 1,411 36 -1,375 -97% 0.29 0.99 0.99 0.00 0% 188 181 -7 -4% 0.35 0.98 0.99 0.01 1% 145 175 30 21% 0.32 0.56 0.45 -0.11 -20% 359 6 -353 -98% 0.17 0.47 2.73 2.26 476% 328 82 -246 -75% 0.20 2.82 3.11 0.29 10% 747 972 224 30% 0.40 2.75 3.30 0.55 20% 502 541 38 8% 0.40 0.70 0.39 -0.31 -44% 2,177 296 -1,881 -86% 0.38 0.52 0.46 -0.06 -12% 812 289 -523 -64% 0.25 0.78 0.20 -0.58 -74% 630 347 -283 -45% 0.06 0.64 0.20 -0.44 -69% 716 345 -371 -52% 0.06 0.33 0.41 0.08 25% 2,563 1,664 -900 -35% 0.23 0.17 0.44 0.27 157% 2,496 1,713 -783 -31% 0.23 56 of 90 ------- 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 NOX 2012 vs 2011 2011 Heat 2012 Heat 2012 vs 2011 2012 vs 2011 Emission Rate Emission Rate NOX Emission Input Input Heat Input Heat Input (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) Rate (%) (mmBtu) (mmBtu) (mmBtu) (%) 118,159 0.29 -0.03 -9% 4,942,880 1,410,186 -3,532,693 -71% 0.23 -0.09 -28% 2,825,367 260,603 -2,564,764 -91% 0.26 0.00 2% 4,027,215 690,202 -3,337,012 -83% 0.24 -0.01 -4% 1,433,788 572,905 -860,883 -60% 0.16 0.00 3% 5,367,324 2,214,194 -3,153,129 -59% 0.13 -0.03 -20% 3,686,457 1,812,186 -1,874,271 -51% 0.14 109,163 0.18 356,638 0.17 0.01 8% 6,798,387 1,610,228 -5,188,159 -76% 0.17 0.01 4% 5,016,528 1,248,858 -3,767,669 -75% 0.39 -0.01 -3% 427,271 10,370 156,209 -271,062 -63% 0.37 0.09 33% 10,978,247 4,378,846 -6,599,401 -60% 0.29 0.01 2% 9,813,823 246,174 -9,567,650 -97% 0.36 0.01 3% 1,068,847 999,660 -69,187 -6% 0.35 0.03 10% 898,029 984,190 86,161 10% 0.37 0.20 119% 4,207,131 33,829 -4,173,302 -99% 0.26 0.06 31% 3,271,326 622,048 -2,649,278 -81% 0.36 -0.04 -9% 3,773,035 5,388,165 1,615,129 43% 0.40 -0.01 -2% 2,481,292 2,720,014 238,722 10% 0.14 -0.24 -63% 11,446,578 4,257,239 -7,189,339 -63% 0.15 -0.09 -38% 6,629,463 3,823,322 -2,806,141 -42% 0.07 0.01 15% 21,723,260 10,372,851 -11,350,410 -52% 0.04 -0.01 -24% 24,911,164 15,782,588 -9,128,576 -37% 0.23 0.00 2% 22,319,315 14,192,599 -8,126,716 -36% 0.21 -0.02 -7% 21,565,819 15,951,190 -5,614,629 -26% 57 of 90 ------- 2011 vs 2012 S02 and NOx Comparisons, Quarterly Acid Rain Program and Clean Air Interstate Rule Emissions, Emission Rates, and Heat Input Changes at Facilities (Coal Units < 2011 data are final, 2012 are preliminary data submitted to EPA from sources as of August 1, 2012. EPA will update as it receives and verifies data 2011 S02 2012 S02 Emissions Emissions 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 Facility Name State County Quarter (tons) (tons) Emissions (tons) Emissions (%) Eastlake OH Lake 1 14,239 11,462 -2,777 -20% Eastlake OH Lake 2 12,295 25,704 13,408 109% Gen J M Gavin OH Gallia 1 9,555 7,801 -1,754 -18% Gen J M Gavin OH Gallia 2 6,921 8,650 1,729 25% Hamilton Municipal Power Plant OH Butler 1 9 9 0 -5% Hamilton Municipal Power Plant OH Butler 2 123 57 -66 -54% JM Stuart OH Adams 1 2,463 2,348 -114 -5% JM Stuart OH Adams 2 2,077 2,344 267 13% Killen Station OH Adams 1 1,675 1,865 189 11% Killen Station OH Adams 2 1,697 991 -706 -42% Kyger Creek OH Gallia 1 36,286 2,183 -34,103 -94% Kyger Creek OH Gallia 2 33,276 1,120 -32,156 -97% Lake Shore OH Cuyahoga 1 1,037 Lake Shore OH Cuyahoga 2 436 23 -414 -95% Miami Fort Generating Station OH Hamilton 1 7,561 3,533 -4,028 -53% Miami Fort Generating Station OH Hamilton 2 6,514 7,041 528 8% Muskingum River OH Washington 1 26,513 13,151 -13,362 -50% Muskingum River OH Washington 2 27,802 6,451 -21,351 -77% Niles OH Trumbull 1 1,217 66 -1,151 -95% Niles OH Trumbull 2 972 O H Hutchings OH Montgomery 1 140 O H Hutchings OH Montgomery 2 174 55 -119 -68% Picway OH Pickaway 1 Picway OH Pickaway 2 134 R E Burger OH Belmont 1 R E Burger OH Belmont 2 WH Sammis OH Jefferson 1 986 985 -1 0% WH Sammis OH Jefferson 2 991 1,653 662 67% W H Zimmer Generating Station OH Clermont 1 6,964 3,798 -3,165 -45% W H Zimmer Generating Station OH Clermont 2 4,910 116 -4,795 -98% 58 of 90 ------- 3nly) 2011 S02 2012 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) 2012 vs 2011 S02 2011 NOX Emission Rate Emissions (%) (tons) 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 Emissions NOX Emissions (tons) (tons) 2011 NOX 2012 vs 2011 NOX Emission Rate Emissions (%) (lb/mmBtu) 1.69 1.82 0.13 8% 2,271 1,723 -548 -24% 0.27 1.50 2.56 1.06 70% 2,116 3,503 1,387 66% 0.26 0.38 0.31 -0.08 -20% 1,852 1,998 146 8% 0.07 0.39 0.41 0.02 6% 1,392 1,675 283 20% 0.08 0.96 0.97 0.00 0% 3 3 0 -9% 0.30 0.82 0.88 0.06 7% 41 19 -22 -54% 0.27 0.14 0.16 0.01 8% 1,805 1,792 -13 -1% 0.11 0.14 0.18 0.04 28% 1,735 1,781 46 3% 0.12 0.36 0.44 0.08 21% 967 864 -103 -11% 0.21 0.38 0.34 -0.04 -11% 812 644 -169 -21% 0.18 3.80 0.36 -3.44 -91% 1,659 1,072 -587 -35% 0.17 3.75 0.15 -3.60 -96% 1,342 1,348 6 0% 0.15 0.86 353 0.29 0.58 0.59 0.01 1% 229 9 -220 -96% 0.31 0.77 0.37 -0.39 -51% 1,644 1,449 -195 -12% 0.17 1.11 0.71 -0.40 -36% 1,070 1,793 723 68% 0.18 3.76 5.11 1.35 36% 2,652 1,159 -1,493 -56% 0.38 3.03 4.31 1.28 42% 2,279 423 -1,856 -81% 0.25 4.41 4.29 -0.11 -3% 239 17 -222 -93% 0.87 4.25 191 0.83 1.21 45 0.39 1.16 1.09 -0.08 -7% 61 20 -41 -67% 0.41 2.65 22 0.44 0.08 0.09 0.01 14% 2,298 1,288 -1,011 -44% 0.18 0.09 0.09 0.00 5% 2,154 2,421 267 12% 0.19 0.70 0.61 -0.10 -14% 2,839 1,369 -1,470 -52% 0.29 0.50 5.69 5.19 1045% 2,156 13 -2,143 -99% 0.22 59 of 90 ------- 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 NOX 2012 vs 2011 Emission Rate Emission Rate NOX Emission (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) Rate (%) 2011 Heat Input (mmBtu) 2012 Heat Input (mmBtu) 2012 vs 2011 Heat Input (mmBtu) 2012 vs 2011 Heat Input (%) 0.27 0.00 1% 16,863,314 12,612,532 -4,250,783 -25% 0.35 0.09 35% 16,362,946 20,075,041 3,712,096 23% 0.08 0.00 6% 50,048,355 50,966,827 918,471 2% 0.08 0.00 2% 35,514,208 41,881,678 6,367,470 18% 0.29 -0.01 -4% 19,466 18,463 -1,003 -5% 0.29 0.02 6% 301,122 129,944 -171,179 -57% 0.12 0.01 13% 34,305,546 30,180,604 -4,124,942 -12% 0.13 0.02 16% 30,100,845 26,619,422 -3,481,423 -12% 0.20 -0.01 -3% 9,276,441 8,535,038 -741,403 -8% 0.22 0.04 21% 9,016,971 5,903,093 -3,113,878 -35% 0.18 0.00 2% 19,101,885 12,115,962 -6,985,923 -37% 0.18 0.03 22% 17,729,825 14,606,302 -3,123,522 -18% 2,404,891 0.25 -0.06 -19% 1,497,451 76,441 -1,421,010 -95% 0.15 -0.01 -8% 19,705,055 18,937,687 -767,368 -4% 0.18 0.00 -1% 11,774,530 19,908,296 8,133,766 69% 0.45 0.07 20% 14,116,917 5,149,794 -8,967,122 -64% 0.28 0.03 14% 18,330,976 2,994,732 -15,336,244 -84% 1.09 0.23 26% 552,168 30,581 -521,587 -94% 457,056 230,992 0.40 -0.01 -1% 298,583 101,193 -197,390 -66% 101,545 0.12 -0.06 -36% 25,440,598 22,200,682 -3,239,916 -13% 0.13 -0.06 -29% 22,868,382 36,402,847 13,534,465 59% 0.22 -0.07 -24% 19,810,783 12,514,287 -7,296,496 -37% 0.64 0.42 192% 19,763,572 40,711 -19,722,860 -100% 60 of 90 ------- 2011 vs 2012 S02 and NOx Comparisons, Quarterly Acid Rain Program and Clean Air Interstate Rule Emissions, Emission Rates, and Heat Input Changes at Facilities (Coal Units < 2011 data are final, 2012 are preliminary data submitted to EPA from sources as of August 1, 2012. EPA will update as it receives and verifies data 2011 S02 2012 S02 Emissions Emissions 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 Facility Name State County Quarter (tons) (tons) Emissions (tons) Emissions (%) Walter C Beckjord Generating Station OH Clermont 1 29,652 18,688 -10,964 -37% Walter C Beckjord Generating Station OH Clermont 2 20,505 20,051 -454 -2% Grand River Dam Authority OK Mayes 1 5,040 3,968 -1,073 -21% Grand River Dam Authority OK Mayes 2 3,934 3,242 -692 -18% Hugo OK Choctaw 1 2,414 2,088 -326 -14% Hugo OK Choctaw 2 2,514 1,763 -751 -30% Muskogee OK Muskogee 1 7,090 6,192 -898 -13% Muskogee OK Muskogee 2 6,574 5,031 -1,543 -23% Northeastern OK Rogers 1 3,832 2,966 -866 -23% Northeastern OK Rogers 2 4,458 3,689 -769 -17% Sooner OK Noble 1 5,747 4,334 -1,413 -25% Sooner OK Noble 2 4,922 2,997 -1,924 -39% Boardman OR Morrow 1 3,422 3,523 101 3% Boardman OR Morrow 2 949 20 -929 -98% AES Beaver Valley LLC PA Beaver 1 806 762 -44 -6% AES Beaver Valley LLC PA Beaver 2 777 Armstrong Power Station PA Armstrong 1 6,316 1,693 -4,623 -73% Armstrong Power Station PA Armstrong 2 6,852 1,393 -5,459 -80% Bruce Mansfield PA Beaver 1 4,524 5,623 1,099 24% Bruce Mansfield PA Beaver 2 5,021 4,315 -706 -14% Brunner Island PA York 1 4,711 3,091 -1,620 -34% Brunner Island PA York 2 4,027 1,408 -2,619 -65% Cambria Cogen PA Cambria 1 504 366 -138 -27% Cambria Cogen PA Cambria 2 501 282 -219 -44% Cheswick PA Allegheny 1 7,502 526 -6,976 -93% Cheswick PA Allegheny 2 768 198 -570 -74% Colver Power Project PA Cambria 1 674 683 9 1% Colver Power Project PA Cambria 2 704 564 -140 -20% Conemaugh PA Indiana 1 2,380 1,101 -1,279 -54% Conemaugh PA Indiana 2 2,208 1,187 -1,021 -46% 61 of 90 ------- 3nly) 2011 S02 2012 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2011 NOX 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 2011 NOX Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emissions Emissions NOX Emissions 2012 vs 2011 NOX Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (%) (tons) (tons) (tons) Emissions (%) (lb/mmBtu) 4.72 4.77 0.05 1% 2,524 1,604 -920 -36% 0.40 4.79 4.37 -0.42 -9% 1,628 1,835 208 13% 0.38 0.45 0.44 -0.01 -3% 4,044 3,869 -175 -4% 0.36 0.40 0.40 0.00 -1% 3,528 3,151 -377 -11% 0.36 0.64 0.61 -0.03 -5% 689 629 -61 -9% 0.18 0.63 0.62 -0.01 -2% 720 498 -222 -31% 0.18 0.52 0.52 0.00 -1% 4,824 4,295 -530 -11% 0.36 0.55 0.48 -0.07 -13% 3,984 3,288 -696 -17% 0.34 0.52 0.55 0.03 6% 2,912 2,178 -735 -25% 0.39 0.47 0.52 0.05 10% 3,706 1,223 -2,483 -67% 0.39 0.58 0.55 -0.03 -6% 3,211 2,679 -532 -17% 0.32 0.55 0.46 -0.08 -15% 2,781 2,039 -742 -27% 0.31 0.78 0.92 0.15 19% 1,744 829 -916 -52% 0.40 0.82 0.89 0.07 9% 304 6 -298 -98% 0.26 0.51 0.45 -0.05 -11% 673 739 66 10% 0.42 0.53 632 0.43 3.19 2.83 -0.36 -11% 689 207 -482 -70% 0.35 3.10 2.83 -0.27 -9% 845 164 -681 -81% 0.38 0.21 0.26 0.05 26% 3,939 1,699 -2,241 -57% 0.18 0.25 0.19 -0.06 -23% 2,249 2,911 662 29% 0.11 0.39 0.42 0.03 8% 4,330 2,833 -1,497 -35% 0.36 0.38 0.40 0.02 5% 3,834 1,305 -2,529 -66% 0.36 0.41 0.28 -0.13 -31% 151 276 126 83% 0.12 0.41 0.33 -0.09 -21% 143 179 36 25% 0.12 2.50 0.19 -2.30 -92% 872 980 108 12% 0.29 0.17 0.16 -0.01 -5% 1,122 434 -688 -61% 0.25 0.54 0.50 -0.05 -8% 151 244 93 61% 0.12 0.56 0.44 -0.12 -21% 153 217 64 42% 0.12 0.15 0.11 -0.04 -29% 5,456 3,357 -2,099 -38% 0.34 0.14 0.11 -0.04 -26% 5,298 3,532 -1,766 -33% 0.34 62 of 90 ------- 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 NOX 2012 vs 2011 2011 Heat 2012 Heat 2012 vs 2011 2012 vs 2011 Emission Rate Emission Rate NOX Emission Input Input Heat Input Heat Input (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) Rate (%) (mmBtu) (mmBtu) (mmBtu) (%) 0.41 0.01 2% 12,557,051 7,831,766 -4,725,285 -38% 0.40 0.02 5% 8,554,862 9,168,066 613,203 7% 0.43 0.06 18% 22,275,239 18,106,958 -4,168,282 -19% 0.39 0.03 7% 19,512,977 16,235,664 -3,277,313 -17% 0.18 0.00 1% 7,513,627 6,809,722 -703,905 -9% 0.18 -0.01 -4% 7,925,786 5,689,677 -2,236,110 -28% 0.36 0.00 1% 27,007,956 23,742,502 -3,265,455 -12% 0.31 -0.02 -7% 23,715,713 20,954,360 -2,761,353 -12% 0.40 0.01 2% 14,793,838 10,805,756 -3,988,082 -27% 0.17 -0.22 -56% 18,873,224 14,241,886 -4,631,338 -25% 0.34 0.01 4% 19,862,521 15,869,416 -3,993,104 -20% 0.31 0.01 2% 18,058,827 12,949,776 -5,109,051 -28% 0.22 -0.18 -45% 8,802,419 7,620,084 -1,182,336 -13% 0.27 0.01 3% 2,318,572 44,633 -2,273,939 -98% 0.44 0.02 4% 3,190,783 2,960,484 3,379,261 188,479 6% 0.35 0.00 -1% 3,958,762 1,198,289 -2,760,474 -70% 0.33 -0.05 -13% 4,420,959 983,964 -3,436,995 -78% 0.08 -0.10 -56% 42,903,525 42,471,405 -432,120 -1% 0.13 0.02 15% 40,441,878 45,347,968 4,906,090 12% 0.39 0.03 8% 24,153,190 14,627,027 -9,526,162 -39% 0.37 0.01 3% 21,116,941 7,008,676 -14,108,265 -67% 0.21 0.09 75% 2,450,918 2,573,634 122,716 5% 0.21 0.09 75% 2,415,814 1,726,531 -689,282 -29% 0.36 0.07 25% 6,007,057 5,398,235 -608,822 -10% 0.35 0.11 43% 9,096,681 2,463,264 -6,633,417 -73% 0.18 0.06 46% 2,475,367 2,741,233 265,866 11% 0.17 0.05 39% 2,520,251 2,571,970 51,720 2% 0.32 -0.02 -6% 31,821,024 20,848,993 -10,972,031 -34% 0.32 -0.03 -8% 30,936,555 22,345,139 -8,591,416 -28% 63 of 90 ------- 2011 vs 2012 S02 and NOx Comparisons, Quarterly Acid Rain Program and Clean Air Interstate Rule Emissions, Emission Rates, and Heat Input Changes at Facilities (Coal Units < 2011 data are final, 2012 are preliminary data submitted to EPA from sources as of August 1, 2012. EPA will update as it receives and verifies data 2011 S02 2012 S02 Emissions Emissions 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 Facility Name State County Quarter (tons) (tons) Emissions (tons) Emissions (%) Cromby PA Chester 1 501 Cromby PA Chester 2 210 Ebensburg Power Company PA Cambria 1 467 507 40 8% Ebensburg Power Company PA Cambria 2 473 480 8 2% Eddystone Generating Station PA Delaware 1 111 Eddystone Generating Station PA Delaware 2 95 Elrama PA Washington 1 107 65 -42 -39% Elrama PA Washington 2 81 127 47 58% G F Weaton PA Beaver 1 409 G F Weaton PA Beaver 2 506 Gilberton Power Company PA Schuylkill 1 367 202 -166 -45% Gilberton Power Company PA Schuylkill 2 342 9 -333 -97% Hatfield's Ferry Power Station PA Greene 1 408 692 284 70% Hatfield's Ferry Power Station PA Greene 2 458 827 369 81% Homer City PA Indiana 1 13,392 26,247 12,856 96% Homer City PA Indiana 2 18,042 21,851 3,809 21% Keystone PA Armstrong 1 10,070 10,684 614 6% Keystone PA Armstrong 2 10,186 6,199 -3,988 -39% Mitchell Power Station PA Washington 1 199 113 -86 -43% Mitchell Power Station PA Washington 2 307 399 92 30% Montour PA Montour 1 3,710 3,498 -212 -6% Montour PA Montour 2 4,133 2,903 -1,230 -30% Mt. Carmel Cogeneration PA Northumberland 1 104 115 11 10% Mt. Carmel Cogeneration PA Northumberland 2 104 113 9 9% New Castle PA Lawrence 1 1,754 7 -1,746 -100% New Castle PA Lawrence 2 2,656 758 -1,898 -71% Northampton Generating Plant PA Northampton 1 156 127 -30 -19% Northampton Generating Plant PA Northampton 2 136 103 -33 -24% Northeastern Power Company PA Schuylkill 1 207 197 -10 -5% Northeastern Power Company PA Schuylkill 2 184 174 -9 -5% 64 of 90 ------- 3nly) 2011 S02 2012 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2011 NOX 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 2011 NOX Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emissions Emissions NOX Emissions 2012 vs 2011 NOX Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (%) (tons) (tons) (tons) Emissions (%) (lb/mmBtu) 0.73 300 0.44 0.65 136 0.42 0.58 0.63 0.04 7% 84 85 1 1% 0.10 0.58 0.60 0.02 3% 74 73 -1 -1% 0.09 0.40 623 0.32 0.40 65 0.28 0.41 0.43 0.03 6% 104 63 -41 -39% 0.40 0.37 0.40 0.03 9% 115 141 25 22% 0.53 0.53 243 0.32 0.44 250 0.22 0.35 0.35 0.00 0% 55 21 -34 -62% 0.05 0.33 0.34 0.00 1% 47 1 -46 -97% 0.05 0.03 0.06 0.02 77% 5,951 5,668 -283 -5% 0.47 0.03 0.07 0.04 127% 6,895 5,728 -1,167 -17% 0.49 1.45 2.09 0.65 45% 1,407 2,512 1,106 79% 0.15 1.69 2.13 0.45 27% 2,048 2,056 8 0% 0.19 0.78 0.82 0.04 6% 4,942 4,906 -35 -1% 0.38 0.82 0.50 -0.33 -40% 4,736 4,450 -286 -6% 0.38 0.17 0.20 0.03 18% 384 181 -202 -53% 0.32 0.24 0.22 -0.01 -5% 420 566 146 35% 0.32 0.44 0.43 -0.01 -3% 1,583 2,592 1,009 64% 0.19 0.44 0.30 -0.14 -32% 2,616 4,095 1,479 57% 0.28 0.21 0.19 -0.02 -11% 75 95 20 26% 0.16 0.19 0.21 0.02 11% 73 80 7 9% 0.13 2.37 2.24 -0.12 -5% 308 1 -306 -100% 0.42 2.27 2.36 0.09 4% 476 127 -350 -73% 0.41 0.12 0.10 -0.01 -9% 122 100 -22 -18% 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.01 7% 110 83 -27 -24% 0.08 0.27 0.27 0.00 -2% 37 27 -10 -26% 0.05 0.27 0.25 -0.02 -6% 28 24 -4 -15% 0.04 65 of 90 ------- 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 NOX 2012 vs 2011 Emission Rate Emission Rate NOX Emission (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) Rate (%) 2011 Heat Input (mmBtu) 2012 Heat Input (mmBtu) 2012 vs 2011 Heat Input (mmBtu) 2012 vs 2011 Heat Input (%) 1,368,097 650,796 0.10 0.00 0% 1,599,290 1,616,149 16,860 1% 0.09 0.00 0% 1,624,458 1,602,537 -21,921 -1% 3,860,221 474,289 0.42 0.02 6% 523,333 300,263 -223,069 -43% 0.45 -0.08 -16% 435,448 631,643 196,195 45% 1,527,163 2,310,393 0.04 -0.02 -31% 2,098,229 1,148,377 -949,852 -45% 0.05 0.00 -1% 2,056,658 53,703 -2,002,955 -97% 0.46 0.00 0% 25,520,222 24,414,096 -1,106,126 -4% 0.51 0.02 4% 28,396,032 22,590,894 -5,805,138 -20% 0.20 0.05 32% 18,501,488 25,059,289 6,557,800 35% 0.20 0.01 5% 21,409,519 20,471,339 -938,181 -4% 0.38 0.00 -1% 25,826,604 25,958,840 132,236 1% 0.36 -0.03 -7% 24,740,596 24,915,196 174,600 1% 0.31 -0.01 -2% 2,387,029 1,152,476 -1,234,553 -52% 0.32 -0.01 -2% 2,590,277 3,562,560 972,283 38% 0.32 0.13 69% 16,725,333 16,220,308 -505,025 -3% 0.42 0.15 52% 18,782,817 19,298,319 515,501 3% 0.16 0.00 2% 967,281 1,197,339 230,058 24% 0.14 0.01 11% 1,118,591 1,100,697 -17,893 -2% 0.34 -0.08 -19% 1,481,743 6,592 -1,475,152 -100% 0.39 -0.01 -3% 2,341,839 641,314 -1,700,525 -73% 0.08 -0.01 -8% 2,715,668 2,427,117 -288,551 -11% 0.09 0.01 7% 2,620,539 1,850,333 -770,207 -29% 0.04 -0.01 -24% 1,523,729 1,476,251 -47,477 -3% 0.03 -0.01 -16% 1,361,633 1,379,650 18,017 1% 66 of 90 ------- 2011 vs 2012 S02 and NOx Comparisons, Quarterly Acid Rain Program and Clean Air Interstate Rule Emissions, Emission Rates, and Heat Input Changes at Facilities (Coal Units < 2011 data are final, 2012 are preliminary data submitted to EPA from sources as of August 1, 2012. EPA will update as it receives and verifies data 2011 S02 2012 S02 Emissions Emissions 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 Facility Name State County Quarter (tons) (tons) Emissions (tons) Emissions (%) Panther Creek Energy Facility PA Carbon 1 149 137 -12 -8% Panther Creek Energy Facility PA Carbon 2 148 145 -3 -2% Piney Creek Power Plant PA Clarion 1 347 372 25 7% Piney Creek Power Plant PA Clarion 2 396 257 -139 -35% Portland PA Northampton 1 6,071 102 -5,968 -98% Portland PA Northampton 2 4,843 455 -4,388 -91% Scrubgrass Generating Plant PA Venango 1 472 454 -18 -4% Scrubgrass Generating Plant PA Venango 2 468 420 -48 -10% Seward PA Indiana 1 1,870 1,197 -673 -36% Seward PA Indiana 2 1,414 1,046 -368 -26% Shawville PA Clearfield 1 8,702 3,217 -5,485 -63% Shawville PA Clearfield 2 5,987 5,297 -690 -12% St. Nicholas Cogeneration Project PA Schuylkill 1 484 480 -4 -1% St. Nicholas Cogeneration Project PA Schuylkill 2 496 506 10 2% Sunbury PA Snyder 1 5,589 1,096 -4,493 -80% Sunbury PA Snyder 2 3,638 77 -3,560 -98% Titus PA Berks 1 1,515 10 -1,505 -99% Titus PA Berks 2 1,075 270 -805 -75% Wheelabrator - Frackville PA Schuylkill 1 123 115 -8 -6% Wheelabrator - Frackville PA Schuylkill 2 111 100 -11 -10% WPS Westwood Generation, LLC PA Schuylkill 1 67 84 17 25% WPS Westwood Generation, LLC PA Schuylkill 2 42 45 3 8% Canadys Steam SC Colleton 1 3,239 3,425 186 6% Canadys Steam SC Colleton 2 5,281 4,081 -1,200 -23% Cope Station SC Orangeburg 1 242 362 119 49% Cope Station SC Orangeburg 2 441 428 -13 -3% Cross SC Berkeley 1 2,298 2,606 307 13% Cross SC Berkeley 2 2,001 2,406 405 20% Dolphus M Grainger SC Horry 1 751 Dolphus M Grainger SC Horry 2 959 67 of 90 ------- 3nly) 2011 S02 2012 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2011 NOX 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 2011 NOX Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emissions Emissions NOX Emissions 2012 vs 2011 NOX Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (%) (tons) (tons) (tons) Emissions (%) (lb/mmBtu) 0.13 0.13 0.00 3% 145 132 -13 -9% 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.00 -2% 146 142 -5 -3% 0.13 0.71 0.78 0.07 10% 74 71 -3 -3% 0.15 0.91 0.63 -0.27 -30% 64 49 -15 -23% 0.15 2.87 2.67 -0.20 -7% 723 11 -711 -98% 0.34 2.53 2.84 0.31 12% 659 52 -606 -92% 0.34 0.34 0.35 0.00 1% 204 190 -14 -7% 0.15 0.38 0.35 -0.03 -9% 166 173 7 4% 0.13 0.40 0.39 -0.01 -2% 534 326 -209 -39% 0.11 0.44 0.49 0.06 13% 334 185 -149 -45% 0.10 2.97 2.90 -0.07 -2% 1,231 428 -803 -65% 0.42 2.91 2.87 -0.03 -1% 888 731 -158 -18% 0.43 0.35 0.34 0.00 0% 58 61 3 5% 0.04 0.35 0.34 0.00 0% 59 56 -3 -4% 0.04 2.67 2.41 -0.26 -10% 556 143 -413 -74% 0.27 2.69 2.50 -0.19 -7% 360 9 -351 -98% 0.27 1.97 1.14 -0.83 -42% 259 3 -256 -99% 0.34 2.13 2.03 -0.10 -5% 176 48 -128 -73% 0.35 0.19 0.18 -0.01 -5% 115 123 8 7% 0.18 0.19 0.19 0.00 -1% 106 79 -27 -25% 0.19 0.17 0.18 0.01 5% 78 63 -15 -19% 0.20 0.17 0.17 0.00 2% 29 36 7 24% 0.12 2.19 2.16 -0.03 -1% 536 590 55 10% 0.36 2.17 2.21 0.05 2% 870 634 -237 -27% 0.36 0.15 0.14 -0.01 -9% 151 286 135 89% 0.09 0.14 0.16 0.02 16% 298 324 25 8% 0.09 0.13 0.14 0.01 11% 1,340 1,170 -171 -13% 0.08 0.11 0.13 0.03 25% 1,445 1,174 -271 -19% 0.08 2.61 126 0.44 2.70 162 0.46 68 of 90 ------- 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 NOX 2012 vs 2011 2011 Heat 2012 Heat 2012 vs 2011 2012 vs 2011 Emission Rate Emission Rate NOX Emission Input Input Heat Input Heat Input (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) Rate (%) (mmBtu) (mmBtu) (mmBtu) (%) 0.13 0.00 2% 2,279,192 2,030,691 -248,501 -11% 0.13 0.00 -3% 2,270,012 2,263,162 -6,850 0% 0.15 0.00 -1% 976,242 953,180 -23,062 -2% 0.12 -0.03 -18% 874,670 814,629 -60,041 -7% 0.30 -0.04 -13% 4,229,762 76,583 -4,153,179 -98% 0.33 -0.02 -5% 3,824,202 319,728 -3,504,473 -92% 0.15 0.00 -2% 2,755,305 2,614,107 -141,199 -5% 0.14 0.01 6% 2,474,713 2,428,196 -46,517 -2% 0.11 -0.01 -7% 9,377,286 6,118,422 -3,258,864 -35% 0.09 -0.02 -16% 6,450,917 4,235,752 -2,215,165 -34% 0.39 -0.03 -8% 5,867,268 2,217,831 -3,649,437 -62% 0.40 -0.03 -8% 4,121,146 3,688,132 -433,014 -11% 0.04 0.00 6% 2,807,050 2,789,057 -17,994 -1% 0.04 0.00 -7% 2,869,883 2,938,887 69,004 2% 0.31 0.05 18% 4,183,861 910,176 -3,273,686 -78% 0.28 0.02 6% 2,706,647 62,069 -2,644,578 -98% 0.30 -0.03 -10% 1,535,456 17,001 -1,518,456 -99% 0.36 0.01 3% 1,010,256 266,354 -743,903 -74% 0.20 0.01 8% 1,267,439 1,253,651 -13,788 -1% 0.15 -0.03 -18% 1,139,210 1,036,871 -102,339 -9% 0.14 -0.06 -32% 776,960 925,242 148,282 19% 0.14 0.02 18% 496,610 524,531 27,921 6% 0.37 0.01 3% 2,956,706 3,169,270 212,564 7% 0.34 -0.01 -4% 4,874,063 3,686,887 -1,187,176 -24% 0.11 0.01 16% 3,215,216 5,272,130 2,056,915 64% 0.12 0.03 30% 6,314,481 5,258,884 -1,055,597 -17% 0.06 -0.01 -15% 35,152,749 36,002,775 850,026 2% 0.06 -0.01 -16% 38,083,133 575,105 711,003 36,620,891 -1,462,242 -4% 69 of 90 ------- 2011 vs 2012 S02 and NOx Comparisons, Quarterly Acid Rain Program and Clean Air Interstate Rule Emissions, Emission Rates, and Heat Input Changes at Facilities (Coal Units < 2011 data are final, 2012 are preliminary data submitted to EPA from sources as of August 1, 2012. EPA will update as it receives and verifies data 2011 S02 2012 S02 Emissions Emissions 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 Facility Name State County Quarter (tons) (tons) Emissions (tons) Emissions (%) H B Robinson SC Darlington 1 2,110 432 -1,678 -80% H B Robinson sc Darlington 2 1,310 139 -1,171 -89% Jefferies SC Berkeley 1 1,884 155 -1,729 -92% Jefferies sc Berkeley 2 2,258 338 -1,921 -85% McMeekin sc Lexington 1 2,072 870 -1,202 -58% McMeekin sc Lexington 2 1,621 172 -1,449 -89% Urquhart sc Aiken 1 1,202 805 -397 -33% Urquhart sc Aiken 2 1,692 392 -1,300 -77% W S Lee sc Anderson 1 1,083 332 -751 -69% W S Lee sc Anderson 2 2,311 153 -2,158 -93% Wateree sc Richland 1 319 369 50 16% Wateree sc Richland 2 1,165 Williams sc Berkeley 1 188 138 -51 -27% Williams sc Berkeley 2 268 176 -92 -34% Winy ah sc Georgetown 1 929 279 -649 -70% Winy ah sc Georgetown 2 862 123 -739 -86% Big Stone SD Grant 1 3,861 2,599 -1,261 -33% Big Stone SD Grant 2 2,991 2,485 -506 -17% Allen TN Shelby 1 2,823 1,846 -976 -35% Allen TN Shelby 2 2,657 2,277 -380 -14% Bull Run TN Anderson 1 69 0 -69 -100% Bull Run TN Anderson 2 195 25 -169 -87% Cumberland TN Stewart 1 2,730 889 -1,842 -67% Cumberland TN Stewart 2 1,958 3,238 1,280 65% Gallatin TN Sumner 1 5,372 5,562 190 4% Gallatin TN Sumner 2 6,002 4,786 -1,217 -20% John Sevier TN Hawkins 1 4,570 508 -4,062 -89% John Sevier TN Hawkins 2 6,550 1,470 -5,080 -78% Johnsonville TN Humphreys 1 8,958 4,843 -4,115 -46% Johnsonville TN Humphreys 2 10,670 4,532 -6,139 -58% 70 of 90 ------- 3nly) 2011 S02 2012 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2011 NOX 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 2011 NOX Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emissions Emissions NOX Emissions 2012 vs 2011 NOX Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (%) (tons) (tons) (tons) Emissions (%) (lb/mmBtu) 1.41 1.65 0.24 17% 810 169 -641 -79% 0.54 1.65 1.73 0.08 5% 456 46 -409 -90% 0.57 2.64 2.53 -0.11 -4% 353 28 -326 -92% 0.50 2.83 2.28 -0.55 -19% 396 74 -322 -81% 0.50 1.34 1.22 -0.13 -9% 494 275 -219 -44% 0.32 1.29 1.49 0.21 16% 390 34 -355 -91% 0.31 2.35 1.33 -1.02 -43% 141 126 -15 -10% 0.28 2.28 1.12 -1.16 -51% 219 61 -158 -72% 0.30 1.42 1.70 0.28 20% 181 45 -136 -75% 0.24 1.48 1.63 0.15 10% 393 23 -370 -94% 0.25 0.06 0.10 0.04 66% 500 348 -152 -30% 0.09 0.24 633 0.13 0.05 0.05 0.00 -6% 495 310 -185 -37% 0.13 0.05 0.04 -0.01 -21% 610 473 -136 -22% 0.11 0.12 0.09 -0.03 -23% 763 294 -470 -62% 0.10 0.10 0.03 -0.07 -67% 850 341 -509 -60% 0.10 0.79 0.78 -0.02 -2% 3,465 2,251 -1,213 -35% 0.71 0.76 0.84 0.08 10% 2,765 2,076 -690 -25% 0.70 0.47 0.53 0.06 14% 1,070 334 -736 -69% 0.18 0.48 0.44 -0.04 -9% 438 435 -3 -1% 0.08 0.04 0.01 -0.03 -70% 154 0 -154 -100% 0.09 0.04 0.04 -0.01 -17% 306 83 -224 -73% 0.07 0.13 0.10 -0.04 -26% 1,241 1,255 14 1% 0.06 0.12 0.14 0.02 16% 1,143 2,268 1,125 98% 0.07 0.56 0.61 0.05 9% 1,455 1,409 -46 -3% 0.15 0.64 0.64 -0.01 -1% 1,475 1,178 -297 -20% 0.16 1.19 1.21 0.02 2% 968 101 -867 -90% 0.25 1.23 1.25 0.02 2% 1,318 290 -1,028 -78% 0.25 1.17 1.09 -0.08 -7% 2,118 1,093 -1,025 -48% 0.28 1.26 0.86 -0.40 -32% 2,489 1,198 -1,291 -52% 0.29 71 of 90 ------- 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 NOX 2012 vs 2011 Emission Rate Emission Rate NOX Emission (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) Rate (%) 2011 Heat Input (mmBtu) 2012 Heat Input (mmBtu) 2012 vs 2011 Heat Input (mmBtu) 2012 vs 2011 Heat Input (%) 0.65 0.10 19% 2,989,068 522,929 -2,466,138 -83% 0.58 0.00 1% 1,588,263 160,754 -1,427,509 -90% 0.45 -0.04 -8% 1,425,240 122,441 -1,302,799 -91% 0.50 0.01 1% 1,597,629 296,534 -1,301,095 -81% 0.39 0.06 20% 3,088,087 1,429,680 -1,658,407 -54% 0.30 -0.01 -3% 2,521,065 230,480 -2,290,584 -91% 0.21 -0.07 -24% 1,022,824 1,211,717 188,894 18% 0.17 -0.12 -41% 1,481,863 700,363 -781,499 -53% 0.23 -0.01 -3% 1,524,763 390,075 -1,134,687 -74% 0.24 -0.01 -5% 3,116,858 188,253 -2,928,606 -94% 0.09 0.00 0% 10,679,174 7,428,188 -3,250,986 -30% 9,897,976 0.11 -0.03 -19% 7,591,544 5,889,386 -1,702,158 -22% 0.10 -0.01 -7% 10,981,063 9,142,603 -1,838,460 -17% 0.10 0.00 -2% 15,637,284 6,141,034 -9,496,250 -61% 0.09 -0.01 -8% 16,831,161 7,340,660 -9,490,501 -56% 0.67 -0.04 -5% 9,726,686 6,682,415 -3,044,271 -31% 0.70 0.00 -1% 7,862,225 5,943,079 -1,919,147 -24% 0.10 -0.08 -46% 12,112,337 6,975,529 -5,136,808 -42% 0.08 0.00 6% 11,075,137 10,410,975 -664,162 -6% 0.09 0.01 7% 3,606,682 4,691 -3,601,992 -100% 0.12 0.05 72% 9,055,780 1,422,578 -7,633,202 -84% 0.14 0.08 129% 40,777,500 18,036,484 -22,741,016 -56% 0.10 0.03 39% 32,181,417 45,862,916 13,681,498 43% 0.15 0.00 2% 19,223,167 18,306,341 -916,826 -5% 0.16 0.00 -1% 18,615,283 15,055,474 -3,559,809 -19% 0.24 -0.01 -4% 7,686,060 840,141 -6,845,920 -89% 0.25 0.00 0% 10,687,077 2,352,883 -8,334,194 -78% 0.25 -0.03 -11% 15,254,178 8,881,569 -6,372,609 -42% 0.23 -0.07 -23% 16,993,567 10,581,490 -6,412,077 -38% 72 of 90 ------- 2011 vs 2012 S02 and NOx Comparisons, Quarterly Acid Rain Program and Clean Air Interstate Rule Emissions, Emission Rates, and Heat Input Changes at Facilities (Coal Units < 2011 data are final, 2012 are preliminary data submitted to EPA from sources as of August 1, 2012. EPA will update as it receives and verifies data 2011 S02 2012 S02 Emissions Emissions 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 Facility Name State County Quarter (tons) (tons) Emissions (tons) Emissions (%) Kingston TN Roane 1 8,933 97 -8,836 -99% Kingston TN Roane 2 9,038 757 -8,281 -92% Big Brown TX Freestone 1 12,984 13,862 878 7% Big Brown TX Freestone 2 13,690 16,481 2,791 20% Coleto Creek TX Goliad 1 4,310 4,175 -135 -3% Coleto Creek TX Goliad 2 4,334 Gibbons Creek Steam Electric Station TX Grimes 1 1,951 4 -1,947 -100% Gibbons Creek Steam Electric Station TX Grimes 2 284 H W Pirkey Power Plant TX Harrison 1 1,175 612 -564 -48% H W Pirkey Power Plant TX Harrison 2 1,320 648 -672 -51% Harrington Station TX Potter 1 4,622 3,867 -755 -16% Harrington Station TX Potter 2 4,122 3,342 -780 -19% J K Spruce TX Bexar 1 295 332 37 13% J K Spruce TX Bexar 2 411 360 -50 -12% J T Deely TX Bexar 1 5,096 1,907 -3,189 -63% J T Deely TX Bexar 2 4,737 1,740 -2,998 -63% Limestone TX Limestone 1 5,655 3,856 -1,799 -32% Limestone TX Limestone 2 6,820 4,736 -2,084 -31% Martin Lake TX Rusk 1 18,638 12,536 -6,102 -33% Martin Lake TX Rusk 2 16,395 7,907 -8,488 -52% Monticello TX Titus 1 12,865 3,288 -9,577 -74% Monticello TX Titus 2 15,427 8,996 -6,431 -42% Oak Grove TX Robertson 1 960 1,311 352 37% Oak Grove TX Robertson 2 1,244 1,126 -118 -9% Oklaunion Power Station TX Wilbarger 1 1,049 567 -482 -46% Oklaunion Power Station TX Wilbarger 2 898 705 -193 -21% Optim Energy Twin Oaks TX Robertson 1 1,432 401 -1,030 -72% Optim Energy Twin Oaks TX Robertson 2 1,407 796 -611 -43% Sam Seymour TX Fayette 1 3,397 399 -2,998 -88% Sam Seymour TX Fayette 2 703 211 -491 -70% 73 of 90 ------- 3nly) 2011 S02 2012 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2011 NOX 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 2011 NOX Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emissions Emissions NOX Emissions 2012 vs 2011 NOX Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (%) (tons) (tons) (tons) Emissions (%) (lb/mmBtu) 1.01 0.21 -0.80 -79% 530 39 -491 -93% 0.06 1.00 0.11 -0.89 -89% 536 390 -146 -27% 0.06 1.17 1.70 0.53 45% 1,479 1,056 -424 -29% 0.13 1.46 1.60 0.14 10% 1,364 1,370 6 0% 0.15 0.67 0.64 -0.03 -4% 811 826 15 2% 0.13 0.67 837 0.13 0.66 0.05 -0.61 -92% 378 10 -368 -97% 0.13 0.06 587 0.12 0.18 0.10 -0.08 -44% 1,085 1,032 -53 -5% 0.16 0.19 0.10 -0.09 -46% 1,110 1,028 -82 -7% 0.16 0.55 0.47 -0.07 -14% 1,424 1,447 23 2% 0.17 0.55 0.45 -0.09 -17% 1,265 1,106 -160 -13% 0.17 0.02 0.03 0.01 20% 790 866 77 10% 0.07 0.03 0.03 0.00 -11% 1,091 909 -183 -17% 0.09 0.63 0.49 -0.15 -23% 1,123 346 -776 -69% 0.14 0.67 0.45 -0.22 -33% 898 299 -599 -67% 0.13 0.35 0.31 -0.04 -13% 3,316 2,169 -1,146 -35% 0.21 0.39 0.39 0.00 -1% 3,803 2,357 -1,446 -38% 0.22 0.82 0.66 -0.17 -20% 4,043 2,944 -1,100 -27% 0.18 0.75 0.50 -0.25 -34% 3,638 2,424 -1,213 -33% 0.17 0.88 0.70 -0.18 -20% 2,229 728 -1,501 -67% 0.15 0.82 1.04 0.22 27% 2,653 1,259 -1,394 -53% 0.14 0.07 0.11 0.04 50% 889 844 -45 -5% 0.06 0.07 0.11 0.04 53% 1,107 697 -411 -37% 0.07 0.21 0.20 -0.02 -9% 1,883 927 -956 -51% 0.38 0.23 0.21 -0.02 -9% 1,397 990 -408 -29% 0.35 0.54 0.52 -0.02 -3% 409 162 -247 -60% 0.15 0.54 0.51 -0.03 -5% 406 271 -135 -33% 0.16 0.25 0.04 -0.22 -85% 1,638 1,058 -579 -35% 0.12 0.04 0.02 -0.02 -58% 1,814 1,117 -698 -38% 0.11 74 of 90 ------- 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 NOX 2012 vs 2011 2011 Heat 2012 Heat 2012 vs 2011 2012 vs 2011 Emission Rate Emission Rate NOX Emission Input Input Heat Input Heat Input (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) Rate (%) (mmBtu) (mmBtu) (mmBtu) (%) 0.08 0.02 38% 17,685,271 930,755 -16,754,516 -95% 0.06 0.00 -6% 18,079,391 13,942,681 -4,136,711 -23% 0.13 0.00 -3% 22,115,592 16,265,451 -5,850,142 -26% 0.13 -0.01 -8% 18,804,334 20,618,793 1,814,459 10% 0.13 0.00 1% 12,919,500 13,078,063 158,563 1% 12,865,616 0.14 0.02 12% 5,937,326 140,658 -5,796,668 -98% 9,769,403 0.17 0.00 2% 13,205,372 12,280,793 -924,579 -7% 0.16 0.00 2% 13,693,364 12,462,294 -1,231,070 -9% 0.18 0.01 5% 16,945,281 16,405,176 -540,105 -3% 0.15 -0.02 -10% 15,080,291 14,720,377 -359,914 -2% 0.08 0.01 17% 23,939,257 22,411,538 -1,527,719 -6% 0.07 -0.01 -15% 24,716,823 24,355,303 -361,520 -1% 0.09 -0.05 -37% 16,136,561 7,855,092 -8,281,469 -51% 0.08 -0.05 -39% 14,066,824 7,749,551 -6,317,273 -45% 0.17 -0.03 -16% 32,262,976 25,153,995 -7,108,981 -22% 0.19 -0.03 -12% 34,647,162 24,327,397 -10,319,765 -30% 0.15 -0.02 -14% 45,376,678 38,239,248 -7,137,429 -16% 0.15 -0.01 -8% 43,771,963 31,761,807 -12,010,156 -27% 0.16 0.00 2% 29,222,638 9,334,983 -19,887,655 -68% 0.15 0.00 3% 37,439,617 17,236,518 -20,203,100 -54% 0.07 0.00 4% 27,394,040 24,921,294 -2,472,746 -9% 0.07 0.00 6% 33,199,466 19,629,858 -13,569,608 -41% 0.32 -0.06 -17% 9,811,267 5,814,074 -3,997,193 -41% 0.29 -0.06 -18% 7,904,035 6,823,378 -1,080,657 -14% 0.21 0.06 37% 5,304,833 1,536,012 -3,768,821 -71% 0.17 0.02 12% 5,237,937 3,124,836 -2,113,100 -40% 0.10 -0.02 -18% 26,717,082 21,155,944 -5,561,138 -21% 0.09 -0.02 -15% 33,045,836 23,819,150 -9,226,686 -28% 75 of 90 ------- 2011 vs 2012 S02 and NOx Comparisons, Quarterly Acid Rain Program and Clean Air Interstate Rule Emissions, Emission Rates, and Heat Input Changes at Facilities (Coal Units < 2011 data are final, 2012 are preliminary data submitted to EPA from sources as of August 1, 2012. EPA will update as it receives and verifies data 2011 S02 2012 S02 Emissions Emissions 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 Facility Name State County Quarter (tons) (tons) Emissions (tons) Emissions (%) San Miguel TX Atascosa 1 1,875 1,996 122 6% San Miguel TX Atascosa 2 2,789 2,600 -188 -7% Sandow TX Milam 1 6,555 5,360 -1,196 -18% Sandow TX Milam 2 6,455 4,285 -2,170 -34% Sandow Station TX Milam 1 418 498 80 19% Sandow Station TX Milam 2 349 350 1 0% Tolk Station TX Lamb 1 3,216 3,390 174 5% Tolk Station TX Lamb 2 5,040 5,118 78 2% W A Parish TX Fort Bend 1 11,305 6,011 -5,293 -47% W A Parish TX Fort Bend 2 13,165 10,880 -2,285 -17% Welsh Power Plant TX Titus 1 6,093 6,226 133 2% Welsh Power Plant TX Titus 2 6,176 5,000 -1,175 -19% Bonanza UT Uintah 1 441 275 -166 -38% Bonanza UT Uintah 2 284 239 -45 -16% Carbon UT Carbon 1 1,788 1,858 70 4% Carbon UT Carbon 2 1,870 1,913 43 2% Hunter UT Emery 1 1,280 1,191 -89 -7% Hunter UT Emery 2 1,038 952 -86 -8% Huntington UT Emery 1 843 563 -280 -33% Huntington UT Emery 2 779 659 -120 -15% Intermountain UT Millard 1 1,036 632 -404 -39% Intermountain UT Millard 2 976 593 -383 -39% Altavista Power Station VA Campbell 1 Altavista Power Station VA Campbell 2 Birchwood Power Facility VA King George 1 61 28 -33 -54% Birchwood Power Facility VA King George 2 16 19 3 21% Bremo Power Station VA Fluvanna 1 2,035 658 -1,377 -68% Bremo Power Station VA Fluvanna 2 1,664 404 -1,260 -76% Chesapeake Energy Center VA Chesapeake (City) 1 4,995 1,879 -3,116 -62% Chesapeake Energy Center VA Chesapeake (City) 2 4,102 2,580 -1,522 -37% 76 of 90 ------- 3nly) 2011 S02 2012 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2011 NOX 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 2011 NOX Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emissions Emissions NOX Emissions 2012 vs 2011 NOX Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (%) (tons) (tons) (tons) Emissions (%) (lb/mmBtu) 0.62 0.59 -0.03 -5% 582 563 -19 -3% 0.19 0.58 0.61 0.02 4% 958 799 -159 -17% 0.20 1.02 0.96 -0.05 -5% 316 348 31 10% 0.05 1.01 1.03 0.02 2% 336 272 -64 -19% 0.05 0.08 0.09 0.01 16% 342 350 8 2% 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.01 19% 291 245 -46 -16% 0.06 0.55 0.57 0.02 3% 1,163 1,022 -140 -12% 0.20 0.50 0.51 0.01 1% 1,962 1,628 -334 -17% 0.20 0.55 0.55 0.00 0% 1,026 510 -516 -50% 0.05 0.54 0.50 -0.04 -7% 1,190 1,066 -124 -10% 0.05 0.45 0.43 -0.02 -4% 2,611 2,771 160 6% 0.19 0.46 0.42 -0.03 -8% 2,554 2,146 -408 -16% 0.19 0.10 0.06 -0.03 -35% 1,753 1,779 27 2% 0.39 0.07 0.08 0.01 13% 1,463 1,202 -261 -18% 0.37 1.03 0.98 -0.05 -5% 853 936 83 10% 0.49 1.10 1.05 -0.05 -5% 853 869 16 2% 0.50 0.12 0.11 -0.01 -9% 3,859 3,330 -530 -14% 0.35 0.10 0.08 -0.02 -16% 3,199 3,286 87 3% 0.31 0.11 0.07 -0.05 -42% 1,674 1,924 251 15% 0.23 0.09 0.08 -0.02 -18% 1,689 1,903 214 13% 0.20 0.07 0.08 0.01 12% 5,421 2,882 -2,540 -47% 0.38 0.07 0.06 -0.01 -11% 5,006 2,871 -2,135 -43% 0.37 0.09 0.09 0.00 0% 64 34 -30 -47% 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.00 6% 20 24 4 19% 0.10 1.60 1.67 0.07 4% 589 182 -407 -69% 0.46 1.50 1.54 0.05 3% 488 122 -365 -75% 0.44 1.21 1.09 -0.12 -10% 2,015 719 -1,295 -64% 0.49 1.14 1.24 0.10 9% 1,592 860 -732 -46% 0.44 77 of 90 ------- 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 NOX 2012 vs 2011 2011 Heat 2012 Heat 2012 vs 2011 2012 vs 2011 Emission Rate Emission Rate NOX Emission Input Input Heat Input Heat Input (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) Rate (%) (mmBtu) (mmBtu) (mmBtu) (%) 0.17 -0.03 -14% 6,002,800 6,719,196 716,396 12% 0.19 -0.01 -7% 9,566,724 8,561,596 -1,005,128 -11% 0.06 0.01 27% 12,906,014 11,141,013 -1,765,001 -14% 0.07 0.01 25% 12,797,783 8,306,061 -4,491,722 -35% 0.06 0.00 0% 10,489,001 10,788,970 299,969 3% 0.06 0.00 0% 9,156,344 7,692,661 -1,463,683 -16% 0.17 -0.03 -14% 11,629,684 11,871,210 241,525 2% 0.16 -0.03 -17% 20,084,821 20,123,535 38,714 0% 0.05 0.00 -6% 41,078,913 21,772,057 -19,306,856 -47% 0.05 0.00 1% 48,724,156 43,099,059 -5,625,096 -12% 0.19 0.00 -1% 27,221,638 29,100,158 1,878,520 7% 0.18 -0.01 -4% 26,873,848 23,547,588 -3,326,260 -12% 0.41 0.02 5% 8,995,218 8,679,776 -315,441 -4% 0.40 0.04 10% 7,969,785 5,954,679 -2,015,105 -25% 0.49 0.00 0% 3,476,082 3,806,797 330,715 10% 0.48 -0.03 -5% 3,395,371 3,651,488 256,117 8% 0.29 -0.06 -16% 22,044,642 22,620,068 575,425 3% 0.29 -0.02 -5% 20,707,932 22,501,436 1,793,505 9% 0.22 0.00 0% 14,841,077 17,142,758 2,301,680 16% 0.22 0.02 10% 16,649,655 17,101,653 451,998 3% 0.37 -0.01 -2% 28,914,098 15,687,450 -13,226,648 -46% 0.31 -0.06 -16% 26,818,188 18,258,663 -8,559,525 -32% 0.11 0.01 16% 1,399,058 647,537 -751,521 -54% 0.10 0.00 4% 402,010 459,214 57,204 14% 0.46 0.00 0% 2,547,651 790,291 -1,757,360 -69% 0.47 0.03 6% 2,225,504 524,250 -1,701,253 -76% 0.42 -0.07 -15% 8,232,169 3,438,313 -4,793,856 -58% 0.42 -0.03 -6% 7,179,877 4,145,796 -3,034,081 -42% 78 of 90 ------- 2011 vs 2012 S02 and NOx Comparisons, Quarterly Acid Rain Program and Clean Air Interstate Rule Emissions, Emission Rates, and Heat Input Changes at Facilities (Coal Units < 2011 data are final, 2012 are preliminary data submitted to EPA from sources as of August 1, 2012. EPA will update as it receives and verifies data 2011 S02 2012 S02 Emissions Emissions 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 Facility Name State County Quarter (tons) (tons) Emissions (tons) Emissions (%) Chesterfield Power Station VA Chesterfield 1 4,515 362 -4,153 -92% Chesterfield Power Station VA Chesterfield 2 8,325 333 -7,992 -96% Clinch River VA Russell 1 1,935 742 -1,192 -62% Clinch River VA Russell 2 1,443 880 -564 -39% Clover Power Station VA Halifax 1 601 593 -8 -1% Clover Power Station VA Halifax 2 368 317 -51 -14% Cogentrix-Hopewell VA Hopewell (City) 1 673 434 -239 -36% Cogentrix-Hopewell VA Hopewell (City) 2 538 334 -204 -38% Cogentrix-Portsmouth VA Portsmouth (City) 1 194 12 -182 -94% Cogentrix-Portsmouth VA Portsmouth (City) 2 206 39 -166 -81% Glen Lyn VA Giles 1 298 34 -263 -89% Glen Lyn VA Giles 2 0 103 103 87080% Hopewell Power Station VA Hopewell (City) 1 7 3 -4 -57% Hopewell Power Station VA Hopewell (City) 2 2 3 1 52% Mecklenburg Power Station VA Mecklenburg 1 54 7 -47 -87% Mecklenburg Power Station VA Mecklenburg 2 46 79 33 73% Possum Point Power Station VA Prince William 1 0 Possum Point Power Station VA Prince William 2 0 0 0 212% Potomac River VA Alexandria (City) 1 227 181 -47 -20% Potomac River VA Alexandria (City) 2 120 Southampton Power Station VA Southampton 1 13 11 -3 -20% Southampton Power Station VA Southampton 2 14 4 -10 -74% Spruance Genco, LLC VA Richmond (City) 1 264 115 -150 -57% Spruance Genco, LLC VA Richmond (City) 2 253 109 -145 -57% Virginia City Hybrid Energy Center VA Wise 2 120 Yorktown Power Station VA York 1 4,185 2,160 -2,025 -48% Yorktown Power Station VA York 2 3,884 1,975 -1,909 -49% Centralia WA Lewis 1 209 81 -128 -61% Centralia WA Lewis 2 0 Alma WI Buffalo 1 293 29 -265 -90% 79 of 90 ------- 3nly) 2011 S02 Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) 2012 S02 Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2011 NOX Emission Rate Emission Rate Emissions (lb/mmBtu) (%) (tons) 2012 NOX Emissions (tons) 2012 vs 2011 NOX Emissions (tons) 2012 vs 2011 NOX Emissions (%) 2011 NOX Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) 0.56 0.08 -0.48 -86% 1,222 271 -950 -78% 0.15 0.91 0.06 -0.85 -93% 1,314 550 -763 -58% 0.14 0.89 0.85 -0.04 -5% 535 164 -371 -69% 0.25 0.86 0.94 0.08 9% 366 176 -190 -52% 0.22 0.07 0.08 0.01 9% 2,530 2,148 -382 -15% 0.30 0.06 0.08 0.02 38% 1,828 1,163 -665 -36% 0.28 0.73 0.67 -0.06 -8% 304 233 -71 -23% 0.33 0.64 0.63 -0.01 -1% 291 187 -104 -36% 0.35 0.61 0.40 -0.21 -35% 110 9 -101 -92% 0.35 0.46 0.56 0.11 24% 157 23 -134 -85% 0.35 1.50 1.13 -0.37 -25% 74 15 -59 -79% 0.37 0.15 1.28 1.12 724% 0 37 37 61955% 0.08 0.06 0.50 0.44 737% 38 2 -36 -95% 0.31 0.02 0.08 0.06 400% 44 13 -32 -72% 0.31 0.14 0.12 -0.02 -16% 106 17 -89 -84% 0.28 0.11 0.11 0.00 0% 121 191 71 59% 0.30 0.00 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0% 9 32 24 271% 0.10 0.25 0.24 -0.01 -2% 246 138 -108 -44% 0.27 0.25 151 0.31 0.05 0.11 0.05 92% 92 42 -50 -54% 0.38 0.06 0.05 -0.01 -18% 92 30 -62 -68% 0.39 0.10 0.10 0.00 1% 111 331 -447 -57% 0.29 0.10 0.10 0.00 -4% 719 321 -398 -55% 0.29 0.12 65 2.11 2.32 0.21 10% 1,095 478 -617 -56% 0.55 2.31 2.31 0.00 0% 950 476 -474 -50% 0.57 0.04 0.03 -0.01 -20% 1,077 495 -582 -54% 0.22 0.01 1 2.03 1.93 -0.10 -5% 90 5 -85 -94% 0.63 80 of 90 ------- 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 NOX 2012 vs 2011 2011 Heat 2012 Heat 2012 vs 2011 2012 vs 2011 Emission Rate Emission Rate NOX Emission Input Input Heat Input Heat Input (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) Rate (%) (mmBtu) (mmBtu) (mmBtu) (%) 0.06 -0.09 -61% 16,093,229 9,254,805 -6,838,424 -42% 0.10 -0.04 -27% 18,328,209 10,510,411 -7,817,798 -43% 0.19 -0.06 -24% 4,348,824 1,752,607 -2,596,217 -60% 0.19 -0.03 -14% 3,357,117 1,876,279 -1,480,838 -44% 0.28 -0.02 -6% 16,869,900 15,248,817 -1,621,083 -10% 0.28 0.00 2% 13,290,624 8,305,158 -4,985,466 -38% 0.36 0.03 9% 1,841,844 1,291,068 -550,776 -30% 0.35 0.01 2% 1,684,672 1,056,649 -628,023 -37% 0.30 -0.05 -14% 632,597 60,935 -571,662 -90% 0.34 -0.01 -4% 900,728 138,636 -762,092 -85% 0.51 0.13 36% 397,044 60,420 -336,624 -85% 0.46 0.38 486% 1,529 161,839 160,310 10486% 0.28 -0.03 -9% 243,750 12,497 -231,253 -95% 0.29 -0.02 -7% 287,231 87,470 -199,761 -70% 0.29 0.01 3% 761,692 120,342 -641,350 -84% 0.28 -0.02 -8% 794,632 1,372,008 577,376 73% 0.14 75,924 0.12 0.02 19% 174,287 542,940 368,653 212% 0.19 -0.09 -31% 1,813,707 981,197 1,478,159 -335,548 -19% 0.42 0.04 10% 485,883 202,149 -283,734 -58% 0.40 0.01 2% 469,633 148,533 -321,100 -68% 0.29 0.00 -1% 5,338,738 2,288,410 -3,050,328 -57% 0.29 0.00 -1% 4,937,334 2,219,322 -2,718,012 -55% 0.07 1,985,330 0.51 -0.04 -7% 3,971,327 1,863,155 -2,108,172 -53% 0.56 -0.01 -2% 3,359,470 1,708,999 -1,650,470 -49% 0.21 -0.01 -5% 9,811,584 4,730,847 -5,080,737 -52% 0.33 6,091 0.35 -0.27 -44% 288,763 29,538 -259,226 -90% 81 of 90 ------- 2011 vs 2012 S02 and NOx Comparisons, Quarterly Acid Rain Program and Clean Air Interstate Rule Emissions, Emission Rates, and Heat Input Changes at Facilities (Coal Units < 2011 data are final, 2012 are preliminary data submitted to EPA from sources as of August 1, 2012. EPA will update as it receives and verifies data 2011 S02 2012 S02 Emissions Emissions 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 Facility Name State County Quarter (tons) (tons) Emissions (tons) Emissions (%) Alma WI Buffalo 2 204 312 108 53% Bay Front WI Ashland 1 95 0 -95 -100% Bay Front WI Ashland 2 9 0 -9 -100% Blount Street WI Dane 1 Blount Street WI Dane 2 0 Columbia WI Columbia 1 5,379 3,976 -1,403 -26% Columbia WI Columbia 2 5,663 6,838 1,175 21% DTE Stoneman, LLC WI Grant 1 69 39 -30 -43% DTE Stoneman, LLC WI Grant 2 81 33 -48 -59% Edgewater (4050) WI Sheboygan 1 4,464 2,915 -1,549 -35% Edgewater (4050) WI Sheboygan 2 3,615 2,204 -1,411 -39% Elm Road Generating Station WI Milwaukee 1 159 19 -140 -88% Elm Road Generating Station WI Milwaukee 2 61 16 -45 -74% Genoa WI Vernon 1 2,007 623 -1,385 -69% Genoa WI Vernon 2 736 192 -544 -74% J P Madgett WI Buffalo 1 1,438 947 -490 -34% J P Madgett WI Buffalo 2 845 634 -211 -25% Nelson Dewey WI Grant 1 4,262 602 -3,660 -86% Nelson Dewey WI Grant 2 2,769 734 -2,035 -74% Pleasant Prairie WI Kenosha 1 170 180 10 6% Pleasant Prairie WI Kenosha 2 175 89 -86 -49% Pulliam WI Brown 1 1,039 201 -838 -81% Pulliam WI Brown 2 843 524 -320 -38% South Oak Creek WI Milwaukee 1 3,350 1,598 -1,752 -52% South Oak Creek WI Milwaukee 2 3,261 11 -3,250 -100% Valley (WEPCO) WI Milwaukee 1 1,458 1,147 -312 -21% Valley (WEPCO) WI Milwaukee 2 1,053 665 -388 -37% Weston WI Marathon 1 2,166 731 -1,434 -66% Weston WI Marathon 2 1,671 1,911 239 14% Albright Power Station wv Preston 1 2,231 295 -1,936 -87% 82 of 90 ------- 3nly) 2011 S02 2012 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2011 NOX 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 2011 NOX Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emissions Emissions NOX Emissions 2012 vs 2011 NOX Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (%) (tons) (tons) (tons) Emissions (%) (lb/mmBtu) 1.20 1.97 0.77 64% 79 74 -6 -7% 0.47 0.48 0.01 -0.47 -99% 184 4 -181 -98% 0.93 0.32 0.00 -0.31 -99% 22 2 -21 -93% 0.78 0.03 1 0.51 0.66 0.59 -0.07 -10% 1,178 939 -239 -20% 0.14 0.64 0.62 -0.02 -3% 1,314 1,530 216 16% 0.15 0.16 0.06 -0.10 -62% 86 126 39 46% 0.20 0.15 0.06 -0.09 -59% 110 106 -5 -4% 0.20 0.63 0.59 -0.04 -6% 990 663 -326 -33% 0.14 0.63 0.65 0.02 3% 821 496 -326 -40% 0.14 0.02 0.01 -0.02 -69% 384 141 -243 -63% 0.05 0.01 0.01 0.00 -34% 328 132 -196 -60% 0.05 1.18 0.55 -0.62 -53% 313 118 -195 -62% 0.18 0.65 0.70 0.05 8% 180 41 -140 -77% 0.16 0.43 0.40 -0.03 -6% 900 575 -325 -36% 0.27 0.41 0.29 -0.12 -30% 525 548 22 4% 0.25 1.93 0.62 -1.31 -68% 1,061 481 -580 -55% 0.48 1.69 0.50 -1.19 -70% 786 672 -114 -14% 0.48 0.02 0.02 0.00 8% 558 509 -49 -9% 0.07 0.03 0.02 -0.01 -32% 395 288 -107 -27% 0.07 0.66 0.60 -0.06 -9% 389 79 -310 -80% 0.25 0.68 0.57 -0.11 -16% 317 232 -86 -27% 0.25 0.46 0.33 -0.13 -29% 1,043 554 -490 -47% 0.14 0.45 0.00 -0.44 -99% 1,075 266 -809 -75% 0.15 0.77 0.77 0.01 1% 423 332 -92 -22% 0.22 0.77 0.79 0.02 3% 310 185 -125 -40% 0.23 0.28 0.15 -0.13 -46% 746 355 -390 -52% 0.10 0.24 0.36 0.12 51% 674 508 -166 -25% 0.10 2.51 2.38 -0.13 -5% 282 40 -242 -86% 0.32 83 of 90 ------- 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 NOX 2012 vs 2011 Emission Rate Emission Rate NOX Emission (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) Rate (%) 2011 Heat Input (mmBtu) 2012 Heat Input (mmBtu) 2012 vs 2011 2012 vs 2011 Heat Input Heat Input (mmBtu) (%) 0.47 0.00 0% 340,566 316,199 -24,366 -7% 0.35 -0.59 -63% 394,825 20,371 -374,454 -95% 0.34 -0.44 -56% 56,921 9,340 -47,581 -84% 3,765 0.14 0.00 -3% 16,319,429 13,464,853 -2,854,576 -17% 0.14 -0.01 -7% 17,716,690 22,156,757 4,440,067 25% 0.20 0.00 -2% 857,594 1,273,434 415,840 48% 0.19 -0.01 -3% 1,110,172 1,095,055 -15,117 -1% 0.13 0.00 -3% 14,264,927 9,874,539 -4,390,388 -31% 0.15 0.00 2% 11,464,192 6,778,386 -4,685,807 -41% 0.05 0.00 -5% 14,224,808 5,521,426 -8,703,382 -61% 0.05 0.00 1% 12,642,330 5,032,876 -7,609,455 -60% 0.10 -0.08 -43% 3,411,334 2,254,036 -1,157,298 -34% 0.15 -0.01 -6% 2,267,547 545,888 -1,721,658 -76% 0.24 -0.02 -9% 6,698,101 4,701,894 -1,996,207 -30% 0.25 -0.01 -2% 4,154,149 4,421,107 266,959 6% 0.50 0.02 3% 4,420,924 1,940,356 -2,480,568 -56% 0.46 -0.02 -5% 3,277,838 2,936,380 -341,458 -10% 0.06 0.00 -7% 16,441,715 16,148,299 -293,416 -2% 0.06 0.00 -2% 12,091,436 8,959,273 -3,132,163 -26% 0.24 -0.01 -5% 3,144,332 671,102 -2,473,229 -79% 0.25 0.00 -2% 2,489,757 1,845,965 -643,792 -26% 0.12 -0.03 -20% 14,409,538 9,613,146 -4,796,392 -33% 0.08 -0.07 -47% 14,622,247 6,782,040 -7,840,207 -54% 0.22 0.00 1% 3,805,153 2,961,557 -843,597 -22% 0.22 -0.01 -3% 2,740,580 1,687,283 -1,053,296 -38% 0.07 -0.02 -24% 15,335,367 9,572,932 -5,762,434 -38% 0.10 0.00 -1% 13,867,472 10,517,140 -3,350,332 -24% 0.32 0.01 3% 1,779,310 248,007 -1,531,303 -86% 84 of 90 ------- 2011 vs 2012 S02 and NOx Comparisons, Quarterly Acid Rain Program and Clean Air Interstate Rule Emissions, Emission Rates, and Heat Input Changes at Facilities (Coal Units < 2011 data are final, 2012 are preliminary data submitted to EPA from sources as of August 1, 2012. EPA will update as it receives and verifies data 2011 S02 2012 S02 Emissions Emissions 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 Facility Name State County Quarter (tons) (tons) Emissions (tons) Emissions (%) Albright Power Station WV Preston 2 1,318 373 -945 -72% Fort Martin Power Station WV Monongalia 1 1,063 420 -644 -61% Fort Martin Power Station WV Monongalia 2 928 613 -315 -34% Grant Town Power Plant WV Marion 1 555 562 7 1% Grant Town Power Plant WV Marion 2 514 515 2 0% Harrison Power Station WV Harrison 1 2,560 1,917 -642 -25% Harrison Power Station WV Harrison 2 1,665 2,968 1,303 78% John E Amos WV Putnam 1 5,399 748 -4,651 -86% John E Amos WV Putnam 2 1,216 751 -465 -38% Kammer WV Marshall 1 4,610 4,764 154 3% Kammer WV Marshall 2 3,640 5,382 1,742 48% Kanawha River WV Kanawha 1 2,421 1,314 -1,107 -46% Kanawha River WV Kanawha 2 2,066 2,040 -26 -1% Longview Power WV Monongalia 1 227 Longview Power WV Monongalia 2 157 Mitchell (WV) WV Marshall 1 1,206 661 -545 -45% Mitchell (WV) WV Marshall 2 780 678 -102 -13% Morgantown Energy Facility WV Monongalia 1 265 269 3 1% Morgantown Energy Facility WV Monongalia 2 266 258 -8 -3% Mount Storm Power Station WV Grant 1 867 1,236 369 43% Mount Storm Power Station WV Grant 2 817 1,179 362 44% Mountaineer (1301) WV Mason 1 524 383 -142 -27% Mountaineer (1301) WV Mason 2 699 216 -482 -69% North Branch Power Station WV Grant 1 North Branch Power Station WV Grant 2 Phil Sporn WV Mason 1 3,295 1,564 -1,730 -53% Phil Sporn WV Mason 2 2,374 1,912 -462 -19% Pleasants Power Station WV Pleasants 1 4,063 2,502 -1,561 -38% Pleasants Power Station WV Pleasants 2 3,183 2,823 -361 -11% Rivesville Power Station WV Marion 1 10 85 of 90 ------- 3nly) 2011 S02 2012 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2011 NOX Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emissions (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (%) (tons) 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 Emissions NOX Emissions (tons) (tons) 2011 NOX 2012 vs 2011 NOX Emission Rate Emissions (%) (lb/mmBtu) 2.70 2.46 -0.24 -9% 200 42 -158 -79% 0.41 0.11 0.13 0.01 12% 2,910 967 -1,943 -67% 0.31 0.12 0.10 -0.02 -15% 2,435 1,837 -598 -25% 0.32 0.41 0.44 0.03 8% 422 390 -31 -7% 0.31 0.40 0.42 0.02 6% 351 363 12 3% 0.27 0.20 0.18 -0.01 -7% 2,489 3,668 1,179 47% 0.19 0.13 0.27 0.14 102% 2,336 3,194 857 37% 0.19 0.27 0.05 -0.22 -81% 1,073 696 -376 -35% 0.05 0.06 0.05 -0.01 -18% 1,111 782 -329 -30% 0.05 2.01 2.20 0.20 10% 998 973 -25 -3% 0.43 2.00 2.17 0.17 8% 766 1,025 259 34% 0.42 1.33 1.28 -0.05 -3% 602 271 -331 -55% 0.33 1.35 1.31 -0.04 -3% 480 455 -25 -5% 0.31 0.05 268 0.05 170 0.11 0.08 -0.03 -30% 552 410 -142 -26% 0.05 0.09 0.09 0.01 6% 460 404 -56 -12% 0.05 0.31 0.31 0.00 0% 233 231 -2 -1% 0.28 0.32 0.31 -0.01 -4% 203 205 2 1% 0.25 0.07 0.11 0.04 53% 916 880 -36 -4% 0.08 0.07 0.12 0.04 57% 878 838 -40 -5% 0.08 0.05 0.04 -0.01 -16% 589 566 -24 -4% 0.05 0.06 0.02 -0.04 -64% 632 509 -123 -19% 0.06 1.45 1.46 0.01 1% 664 241 -423 -64% 0.29 1.48 1.55 0.06 4% 423 291 -132 -31% 0.26 0.36 0.31 -0.05 -15% 1,107 1,028 -79 -7% 0.10 0.30 0.30 0.01 3% 1,301 1,199 -103 -8% 0.12 1.25 6 0.76 86 of 90 ------- 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 NOX 2012 vs 2011 2011 Heat 2012 Heat 2012 vs 2011 2012 vs 2011 Emission Rate Emission Rate NOX Emission Input Input Heat Input Heat Input (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) Rate (%) (mmBtu) (mmBtu) (mmBtu) (%) 0.28 -0.13 -32% 975,465 303,292 -672,173 -69% 0.30 -0.02 -5% 18,534,994 6,507,112 -12,027,881 -65% 0.31 -0.01 -3% 15,076,725 11,735,227 -3,341,498 -22% 0.31 0.00 -1% 2,716,343 2,540,326 -176,018 -6% 0.30 0.03 9% 2,581,575 2,442,938 -138,637 -5% 0.35 0.16 83% 25,928,056 20,824,657 -5,103,399 -20% 0.29 0.10 55% 24,937,775 22,036,369 -2,901,405 -12% 0.05 -0.01 -11% 39,694,755 28,874,116 -10,820,639 -27% 0.05 0.00 -6% 42,188,688 31,693,083 -10,495,605 -25% 0.45 0.02 4% 4,592,192 4,321,729 -270,463 -6% 0.41 -0.01 -2% 3,631,702 4,949,702 1,318,000 36% 0.26 -0.07 -20% 3,642,475 2,048,532 -1,593,943 -44% 0.29 -0.02 -7% 3,065,120 3,107,494 42,373 1% 0.06 9,539,768 0.06 5,916,785 0.05 0.00 -5% 21,020,735 16,423,746 -4,596,989 -22% 0.06 0.00 7% 17,635,608 14,497,771 -3,137,837 -18% 0.27 -0.01 -2% 1,690,383 1,717,679 27,296 2% 0.25 0.00 0% 1,644,700 1,661,249 16,549 1% 0.08 0.00 3% 23,216,811 21,639,204 -1,577,607 -7% 0.08 0.00 4% 22,124,848 20,355,543 -1,769,305 -8% 0.06 0.01 10% 22,801,757 19,912,528 -2,889,228 -13% 0.05 0.00 -7% 22,779,825 19,781,443 -2,998,382 -13% 0.23 -0.07 -23% 4,534,916 2,138,414 -2,396,501 -53% 0.24 -0.03 -11% 3,200,139 2,473,855 -726,284 -23% 0.13 0.03 29% 22,490,955 16,242,535 -6,248,420 -28% 0.13 0.01 7% 21,504,120 18,562,281 -2,941,840 -14% 15,663 87 of 90 ------- 2011 vs 2012 S02 and NOx Comparisons, Quarterly Acid Rain Program and Clean Air Interstate Rule Emissions, Emission Rates, and Heat Input Changes at Facilities (Coal Units < 2011 data are final, 2012 are preliminary data submitted to EPA from sources as of August 1, 2012. EPA will update as it receives and verifies data 2011 S02 2012 S02 Emissions Emissions 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 Facility Name State County Quarter (tons) (tons) Emissions (tons) Emissions (%) Rivesville Power Station WV Marion 2 14 19 5 37% Willow Island Power Station wv Pleasants 1 493 60 -433 -88% Willow Island Power Station WV Pleasants 2 414 1 -413 -100% Dave Johnston WY Converse 1 2,794 2,578 -216 -8% Dave Johnston WY Converse 2 3,039 1,849 -1,190 -39% Dry Fork Station WY Campbell 1 153 Dry Fork Station WY Campbell 2 203 Jim Bridger WY Sweetwater 1 2,641 2,497 -144 -5% Jim Bridger WY Sweetwater 2 1,724 1,620 -104 -6% Laramie River WY Platte 1 2,500 2,330 -170 -7% Laramie River WY Platte 2 1,952 1,685 -267 -14% Naughton WY Lincoln 1 5,188 3,241 -1,946 -38% Naughton WY Lincoln 2 5,196 326 -4,870 -94% Neil Simpson II WY Campbell 1 149 116 -33 -22% Neil Simpson II WY Campbell 2 144 45 -98 -68% Wygen I WY Campbell 1 150 98 -52 -35% Wygen I WY Campbell 2 164 74 -90 -55% Wygen II WY Campbell 1 58 40 -17 -30% Wygen II WY Campbell 2 55 46 -9 -16% Wygen III WY Campbell 1 73 77 4 5% Wygen III WY Campbell 2 66 75 9 14% Wyodak WY Campbell 1 1,223 558 -665 -54% Wyodak WY Campbell 2 329 577 248 76% 88 of 90 ------- 3nly) 2011 S02 2012 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2012 vs 2011 S02 2011 NOX 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 2011 NOX Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emission Rate Emissions Emissions NOX Emissions 2012 vs 2011 NOX Emission Rate (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) (%) (tons) (tons) (tons) Emissions (%) (lb/mmBtu) 1.17 0.49 -0.69 -58% 9 24 15 164% 0.78 1.21 1.43 0.22 18% 280 26 -254 -91% 0.69 1.60 1.20 -0.40 -25% 160 0 -159 -100% 0.62 0.40 0.37 -0.03 -8% 1,715 1,685 -29 -2% 0.25 0.38 0.31 -0.08 -20% 1,921 1,860 -62 -3% 0.24 0.04 143 0.05 161 0.16 0.13 -0.03 -17% 3,297 3,559 262 8% 0.20 0.14 0.14 0.00 -1% 2,268 2,091 -177 -8% 0.19 0.13 0.14 0.00 2% 4,204 3,353 -851 -20% 0.22 0.13 0.13 0.01 4% 2,875 2,369 -505 -18% 0.19 0.77 0.45 -0.32 -41% 3,520 2,852 -669 -19% 0.52 0.82 0.14 -0.68 -83% 3,390 517 -2,873 -85% 0.53 0.15 0.10 -0.04 -31% 153 159 7 4% 0.15 0.15 0.11 -0.04 -28% 157 56 -101 -64% 0.17 0.13 0.08 -0.05 -37% 154 152 -2 -1% 0.14 0.15 0.09 -0.06 -41% 154 112 -42 -27% 0.14 0.05 0.05 0.00 -6% 70 51 -19 -27% 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.00 -5% 69 60 -9 -13% 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.00 3% 54 55 1 2% 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.01 15% 50 43 -7 -13% 0.04 0.45 0.15 -0.30 -68% 792 740 -52 -7% 0.29 0.16 0.14 -0.01 -7% 461 763 302 65% 0.22 89 of 90 ------- 2012 NOX 2012 vs 2011 NOX 2012 vs 2011 Emission Rate Emission Rate NOX Emission (lb/mmBtu) (lb/mmBtu) Rate (%) 2011 Heat Input (mmBtu) 2012 Heat Input (mmBtu) 2012 vs 2011 Heat Input (mmBtu) 2012 vs 2011 Heat Input (%) 0.63 -0.15 -20% 23,500 77,160 53,660 228% 0.62 -0.06 -9% 816,282 84,320 -731,962 -90% 0.27 -0.35 -56% 518,589 1,623 -516,965 -100% 0.24 0.00 -2% 13,991,432 13,995,170 3,738 0% 0.31 0.07 28% 15,901,295 12,054,980 -3,846,314 -24% 0.04 7,894,762 0.04 8,980,081 0.19 -0.01 -5% 32,670,399 37,193,688 4,523,289 14% 0.18 0.00 -3% 24,197,814 22,921,374 -1,276,440 -5% 0.20 -0.03 -12% 37,640,236 34,304,183 -3,336,053 -9% 0.19 0.00 -1% 30,365,454 25,193,454 -5,172,001 -17% 0.40 -0.12 -24% 13,480,286 14,337,737 857,451 6% 0.23 -0.31 -58% 12,689,474 4,580,444 -8,109,030 -64% 0.14 -0.01 -7% 2,036,539 2,294,323 257,784 13% 0.14 -0.03 -19% 1,887,389 830,449 -1,056,940 -56% 0.13 -0.01 -4% 2,242,774 2,318,231 75,456 3% 0.13 -0.01 -5% 2,236,623 1,713,871 -522,752 -23% 0.06 0.00 -2% 2,195,290 1,633,781 -561,510 -26% 0.06 0.00 -1% 2,171,040 1,915,990 -255,050 -12% 0.04 0.00 -1% 2,392,231 2,458,647 66,415 3% 0.04 -0.01 -13% 2,234,697 2,230,705 -3,992 0% 0.19 -0.10 -34% 5,446,973 7,660,224 2,213,251 41% 0.19 -0.03 -13% 4,217,261 7,996,895 3,779,634 90% 90 of 90 ------- |