U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Supporting Documents for Risk-Based Prioritization

September 2008

Supporting Documents for Initial Risk-Based Prioritization of
High Production Volume Chemicals

Ethyl (3-methylphenyl)-amino acetonitrile (CASRN 63133-74-4)
(9th CI and CA Index Name: Acetonitrile, [ethyl (3-methylphenyl)amino]-)

Contents:

•	Page 2: Background

•	Page 4: Screening-Level Risk Characterization: September 2008

•	Page 7: Screening-Level Hazard Characterization: September 2008

•	Page 14: Screening-Level Exposure Characterization: September 2008


-------
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Supporting Documents for Risk-Based Prioritization

September 2008

BACKGROUND

Screening-level hazard, exposure and risk characterizations for high production volume chemicals (HPV)
are important contributions to the chemicals cooperation work being done in North America1 through the
EPA Chemical Assessment and Management Program (ChAMP)2. These screening-level
characterizations are developed by EPA for individual chemicals or chemical categories to support initial
Risk-Based Prioritizations (RBPs) for HPV chemicals. These screening-level characterizations are
technical documents intended primarily to inform the Agency's internal decision-making process.
Accordingly, they are written for assessment professionals and assume a degree of technical
understanding. Each of the support documents is described below.

The Risk-Based Prioritizations are found in an accompanying document and are written for a general
audience. They present EPA's initial thinking regarding the potential risks presented by these chemicals
and future possible actions that may be needed.

Hazard Characterizations for HPV Chemicals

EPA's screening-level hazard characterizations are based primarily on the review of the summaries of
studies and other information submitted by the chemical sponsor(s) under the HPV Challenge Program3.
These studies included in the scope of the HPV Challenge comprise the Screening Information Data Set
(SIDS) of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)4, an internationally
recognized battery of tests that provides the basic data necessary to make an initial evaluation of a
chemical's hazards and fate. In preparing the initial hazard characterizations, EPA also consulted a
variety of reliable sources5 for additional relevant information and considered its own comments and
public comments on the original submission as well as the sponsor's responses to comments and revisions
made to the submission. In order to determine whether any new hazard information was developed since
the time of an HPV submission, EPA also searched publicly available databases6 for information entered
from one year prior to the HPV submission through May 2008. The screening-level hazard
characterization is performed according to established EPA guidance7. A more detailed description of the
hazard characterization process is available on the EPA website8.

With respect to chemicals for which internationally-accepted OECD SIDS Initial Assessment Profiles
(SIAP) and Initial Assessment Reports (SIAR) were available, EPA did not generate its own screening-
level hazard characterization, but did check for and incorporate updated information in the risk
characterization.

Exposure Characterizations for HPV Chemicals

EPA recently received exposure-related data on chemicals submitted in accordance with the requirements
of Inventory Update Reporting (IUR)9. The 2006 IUR submissions pertain to chemicals manufactured in

1	U.S. EPA - U.S. Commitments to North American Chemicals Cooperation:
http://www.epa.gov/hpv/pubs/general/sppframework.htm.

2	U.S. EPA - ChAMP information: http://www.epa.gov/champ/.

3	U.S. EPA - HPV Challenge Program information: http://www.epa.gov/hpy.

4	U.S. EPA - Technical Guidance Document, OECD SIDS Manual Sections 3.4 and 3.5:
http://www.epa.gov/chemrtk/pubs/general/sidsappb.htm.

5	U.S. EPA - Public Database Hazard Information: http://www.epa.gov/hpvis/hazardinfo.htm.

6	U.S. EPA - Public Database Update Information: http://www.epa.gov/chemrtk/hpvis/updateinfo.htm.

7	U.S. EPA - Risk Assessment Guidelines: http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/raf/rafguid.cfm.

8	U.S. EPA - About HPV Chemical Hazard Characterizations: http://www.epa.gov/hpvis/abouthc.htm.

9	U.S. EPA - Basic IUR Information: http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/iur/pubs/guidance/basic-infonnation.h1m.

2


-------
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Supporting Documents for Risk-Based Prioritization

September 2008

(including imported into) the U.S. during calendar year 2005 in quantities of 25,000 pounds or more at a
single site. The reports include the identity, the quantity, and the physical form of the chemical
manufactured or imported, and the number of workers reasonably likely to be exposed during
manufacture of the chemical. For chemicals manufactured or imported in quantities of 300,000 pounds or
more at a single site, additional reported information includes: the industrial processing and uses of the
chemical; the number of industrial processing sites and workers reasonably likely to be exposed to the
chemical at those sites; the consumer and commercial uses of the chemical; and an indication whether the
chemical was used in products intended for use by children under 14 years of age.

EPA's screening-level exposure characterizations are based largely on the information submitted under
the IUR reporting, although other exposure information submitted to the Agency (for example, in HPV
submissions) or readily available through a limited set of publicly accessible databases10 was also
considered. The screening-level exposure characterizations identify a potential (high, medium, or low)
that each of five populations - the environment, the general population, workers, consumers, and children
- might be exposed to the chemical. In most cases, this potential doesn't address the quantity, frequency,
or duration of exposure, but refers only to the likelihood that an exposure could occur.

In many instances EPA is not able to fully disclose to the public all the IUR exposure-related data
reviewed or relied upon in the development of the screening-level documents because some of the
material was claimed as confidential business information (CBI) when it was submitted to the Agency.
These CBI claims do limit the Agency's ability to be completely transparent in presenting some
underlying exposure and use data for chemicals in public documents. EPA does consider all data,
including data considered to be CBI, in the screening-level exposure and risk characterization process,
and endeavors whenever possible to broadly characterize supporting materials claimed as confidential in
ways that do not disclose actual CBI.

Risk Characterizations for HPV Chemicals

EPA combines the information from the screening-level exposure characterization with the screening-
level hazard characterization to develop a qualitative screening-level risk characterization, as described in
the Agency's guidance on drafting risk characterizations11. These screening-level risk characterizations
are technical documents intended to support subsequent priority-setting decisions and actions by OPPT.
The purpose of the qualitative screening-level risk characterization is two-fold: to support initial risk-
based decisions to prioritize chemicals, identify potential concerns, and inform risk management options;
and to identify data needs for individual chemicals or chemical categories.

These initial characterization and prioritization documents do not constitute a final Agency determination
as to risk, nor do they determine whether sufficient data are available to characterize risk. Recommended
actions reflect EPA's relative judgment regarding this chemical or chemical category in comparison with
others evaluated under this program, as well as the uncertainties presented by gaps that may exist in the
available data.

10	U.S. EPA - Summary of Public Databases Routinely Searched:
http://www.epa.gov/chemrtk/hpvis/pubdtsum.htm.

11	U.S. EPA - Risk Characterization Program: http://www.epa.gov/osa/spc/2riskchr.htm.

3


-------
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Supporting Documents for Risk-Based Prioritization

September 2008

QUALITATIVE SCREENING-LEVEL RISK CHARACTERIZATION
OF HIGH PRODUCTION VOLUME CHEMICALS

SPONSORED CHEMICAL

Ethyl (3-methylphenyl)-amino Acetonitrile (CAS No. 63133-74-4)
[9th CI Name: Acetonitrile, [ethyl (3-methylphenyl)amino]-]

September 2008

Prepared by

Risk Assessment Division
Economics, Exposure and Technology Division
Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics
Environmental Protection Agency
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20460-0001

4


-------
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Supporting Documents for Risk-Based Prioritization

September 2008

QUALITATIVE SCREENING-LEVEL RISK CHARACTERIZATION FOR
Ethyl (3-methylphenyl)-amino Acetonitrile (CAS No. 63133-74-4)

1.	Physical-Chemical Properties and Environmental Fate

Ethyl(3-methylphenyl)-amino acetonitrile is a clear, colorless liquid at room temperature. Based
on estimated values, the solubility and vapor pressure are considered moderate. It has moderate
mobility in soil and low volatility. The rate of atmospheric photooxidation is rapid. Hydrolysis
is expected to be negligible since this compound does not possess functional groups that
hydrolyze under environmental conditions. The rate of biodegradation is judged to be slow. The
persistence of ethyl (3-methylphenyl)-amino acetonitrile is judged to be moderate (P2) and the
bioaccumulation potential is ranked low (Bl).

2.	Hazard Characterization

Aquatic Organism Toxicity. The acute hazard of ethyl (3-methylphenyl)-amino acetonitrile to
fish and aquatic invertebrates is low, and to aquatic plants is moderate.

Human Health Toxicity. In animal studies, acute toxicity of ethyl (3-methylphenyl)-amino
acetonitrile is moderate via the oral route and low via the dermal route of exposure. Data for
repeated-dose toxicity is not required for the HPV Challenge Program because the chemical is
considered a closed-system intermediate (CSI). In a combined reproductive/ developmental
study in rats via oral gavage, the chemical is considered moderately toxic but there was no
evidence of reproductive or developmental toxicity. Ethyl (3-methylphenyl)-amino acetonitrile
did not induce gene mutations or chromosomal aberrations.

3.	Exposure Characterization

Ethyl (3-methylphenyl)-amino acetonitrile (CAS # 63133-74-4) has an aggregated production
and/or import volume in the United States of 10,000 to 500,000 pounds. IUR information for
this chemical indicates that it is used as an industrial intermediate in manufacturing of other
basic organic compounds. No commercial use is reported in the IUR submissions or other data
sources.

Potential for Exposures to Humans and the Environment:

Based on the information considered, including IUR data and information from the HPV
Challenge Program, and in combination with the Agency's professional judgment, EPA
identifies, for the purposes of risk-based prioritization, a low relative ranking for each of the
potentially exposed groups (including workers, the general population, consumers and children)
and the environment. Persistence and bioaccumulation ratings for this chemical are P2 and Bl,
respectively. These ratings suggest that this chemical is moderately persistent in the
environment and is not bioaccumulative. The Agency has reviewed the information in the
original and revised/ updated HPV submission and determined that the HPV chemical satisfies
the guidance to demonstrate that the chemical is a closed system intermediate. The chemical is
manufactured and processed in systems that are expected to reduce the potential for worker
exposure and environmental releases that could lead to other human and environmental

5


-------
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Supporting Documents for Risk-Based Prioritization

September 2008

exposure. The guidance for identifying this chemical substance as a closed-system intermediate
was satisfied at all sites reporting this chemical in accordance with IUR requirements.

4. Risk Characterization

The statements and rationale provided below are intended solely for the purpose of this
screening-level and qualitative risk characterization and will be used for prioritizing substances
for future work in the Chemical Assessment and Management Program (ChAMP).

Risk Statement and Rationale

The Agency has reviewed the information in the HPV submission or test plan and determined
that the HPV chemical satisfies the guidance to demonstrate that the chemical is a closed system
intermediate (CSI). Ethyl (3-methylphenyl)-amino acetonitrile is manufactured and processed in
closed systems that are expected to reduce the potential for worker exposure and environmental
releases that could lead to other human and environmental exposure. The guidance for
identifying this chemical substance as a closed-system intermediate was satisfied at all sites
reporting this chemical in accordance with IUR requirements. Therefore, there is a low concern
for potential risks to aquatic organisms and the general population from environmental releases,
and also to workers, consumers, and children.

6


-------
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Supporting Documents for Risk-Based Prioritization

September 2008

SCREENING-LEVEL HAZARD CHARACTERIZATION
OF HIGH PRODUCTION VOLUME CHEMICALS

SPONSORED CHEMICAL

Ethyl (3-methylphenyl)-amino acetonitrile (CAS No. 63133-74-4)
[9th CI Name: Acetonitrile, [ethyl (3-methylphenyl)amino]-]

September 2008

Prepared by

Risk Assessment Division
Economics, Exposure and Technology Division
Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics
Environmental Protection Agency
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20460-0001

7


-------
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Supporting Documents for Risk-Based Prioritization

September 2008

SCREENING-LEVEL HAZARD CHARACTERIZATION
Ethyl (3-methylphenyl)-amino acetonitrile (CAS No. 63133-74-4)

Introduction

The sponsor, Eastman Chemical Company, submitted a Test Plan and Robust Summaries to EPA for ethyl (3-
methylphenyl)-amino acetonitrile (CAS No. 63133-74-4; 9th CI name: acetonitrile, [ethyl (3-methylphenyl)amino]-)
on December 10, 2003. EPA posted the submission on the ChemRTK HPV Challenge website on January 13, 2004
(http://www.epa.gov/chemrtk/pubs/summaries/eth3metli/cl4884tc.htm). EPA comments on the original submission
were posted to the website on June 3, 2004. Public comments were also received and posted to the website. The
sponsor submitted updated/revised documents on August 12, 2004, which were posted to the ChemRTK website on
September 20, 2004.

This screening-level hazard characterization is based primarily on the review of the test plan and robust summaries
of studies submitted by the sponsor(s) under the HPV Challenge Program. In preparing the hazard characterization
EPA considered its own comments and public comments on the original submission as well as the sponsor's
responses to comments and revisions made to the submission. In order to determine whether any new hazard
information was developed since the time of the HPV submission a search of the following databases was made
from 2003 to May 2008: the NLM databases (ChemID to locate available data sources including Medline/PubMed,
Toxline, HSDB, IRIS, NTP, ATSDR, EXTOXNET, EPA SRS, etc.), STN/CAS online databases (Registry file for
locators, ChemAbs for toxicology data, RTECS, Merck, etc.) and Science Direct. A summary table of SIDS
endpoint data with the structure(s) of the sponsored chemical (s) is included in the appendix. The screening-level
hazard characterization for environmental and human health effects is based largely on SIDS endpoints and is
described according to established EPA or OECD effect level definitions and hazard assessment practices.

The sponsor proposed reduced health testing, claiming that ethyl (3-methylphenyl)-amino acetonitrile is a closed-
system intermediate (CSI). EPA's evaluation of the original and revised/updated information indicated that the
chemical failed to meet some of the guidance to fully support the CSI status for this chemical. In its revised/updated
submission the sponsor provided additional information that supported the CSI claim. Therefore, EPA has
determined that the chemical qualifies for reduced testing - waiving of repeated-dose and developmental toxicity
testing.

Hazard Characterization

Ethyl (3-methylphenyl)-amino acetonitrile is a clear, colorless liquid at room temperature. Based on estimated
values, the solubility and vapor pressure are considered moderate. It has moderate mobility in soil and low
volatility. The rate of atmospheric photooxidation is rapid. Hydrolysis is expected to be negligible since this
compound does not possess functional groups that hydrolyze under enviromnental conditions. The rate of
biodegradation is judged to be slow. The persistence of ethyl (3-methylphenyl)-amino acetonitrile is judged to be
moderate (P2) and the bioaccumulation potential is ranked low (Bl).

The evaluation of available toxicity data indicate that the potential acute hazard of ethyl (3-methylphenyl)-amino
acetonitrile to fish and aquatic invertebrates is low and to aquatic plants is moderate.

In animal studies, acute toxicity of ethyl (3-methylphenyl)-amino acetonitrile is moderate via the oral route and low
via the dermal route of exposure. Data for repeated-dose toxicity is not required for the HPV Challenge Program
because the chemical is considered a closed-system intermediate (CSI). In a combined reproductive/
developmental study in rats via oral gavage, the chemical is considered moderately toxic, but there was no evidence
of reproductive or developmental toxicity. Ethyl (3-methylphenyl)-amino acetonitrile did not induce gene
mutations or chromosomal aberrations.

No data gaps were identified under the HPV Challenge Program.

8


-------
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Supporting Documents for Risk-Based Prioritization

September 2008

1. Physical-Chemical Properties and Environmental Fate

The physical-chemical properties of ethyl (3-methylphenyl)-amino acetonitrile are summarized in Table la, while its
environmental fate properties are given in Table lb. The structure of the compound is provided in the Appendix.

Physical-Chemical Properties Characterization

Ethyl (3-methylphenyl)-amino acetonitrile is a clear, colorless liquid at room temperature. Using estimated values,
the solubility and vapor pressure are considered moderate.

Table la. Phvsical-Chemical Properties of Ethvl (3-mcthvlphcnvl)-amino acetonitrile1

Property

Value

CAS No.

63133-74-4

Molecular Weight

174.27

Physical State

Liquid

Melting Point

<0°C (measured)

Boiling Point

>250°C (measured)

Vapor Pressure

0.021 mm Hg (estimated)

Water Solubility

252 mg/L (estimated)

Dissociation Constant (pKa)

0.80 (estimated)2

Henry's Law Constant

5.21><10"8 atm-m3/mol (estimated)

Log Kow

2.73 (estimated)

Eastman Chemical Company. 2003. Robust Summary for 3,4-Dichlorotrifluorotoluene.
http://www.epa.gov/chemrtk/pubs/summaries/eth3meth/cl4884tc.htm.

2Estimated by Sparc, May 2008 release w4.21405-s4.21408 (http://ibmlc2.chem.uga.edu/spare).

Environmental Fate Characterization

Ethyl (3-methylphenyl)-amino acetonitrile is expected to partition primarily to soil, according to the results of a
Level III fugacity model that assumes equal emissions to air, water, and soil. Based on its estimated vapor pressure
ethyl (3-methylphenyl)-amino acetonitrile will exist in the vapor phase in the ambient atmosphere. The rate of
atmospheric photooxidation of vapor-phase ethyl (3-methylphenyl)-amino acetonitrile with photochemically
generated hydroxyl radicals is rapid. Volatilization of ethyl (3-methylphenyl)-amino acetonitrile is considered
minimal based on its Henry's Law constant. It has moderate mobility in soil. Hydrolysis is expected to be
negligible since this compound does not possess functional groups that hydrolyze under environmental conditions.
The rate of biodegradation is judged to be slow. The persistence potential of ethyl (3-methylphenyl)-amino
acetonitrile is judged to be moderate (P2) and the bioaccumulation potential is ranked low (B1) based on an
estimated BCF of 25.

9


-------
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Supporting Documents for Risk-Based Prioritization

September 2008

Table lb. Environmental Fate Characteristics of Ethvl (3-mcthvl|)hcnvl)-amino acetonitrile1

Property

Value

Photodegradation Half-Life

0.6 hours (estimated)

Hydrolysis Half-Life

Functional groups are not subject to hydrolysis

Biodegradation

9-13% after 28 days (not readily biodegradable)

Bioconcentration

BCF = 25 (estimated)2

Koc

162.9 (estimated)2

Fugacity

Air = 0.08%,

(Level III Model)2

Water =31.4%,



Soil = 68.2%,



Sediment = 0.33%

Persistence3

P2 (moderate)

Bioaccumulation3

Bl (low)

1 Eastman Chemical Company. 2003. Chemical Challenge Program. Robust Summary for 3,4-Dichlorotrifluoro-

toluene. http://www.epa.gov/chemrtk/pubs/summaries/eth3meth/cl4884tc.htm.

2US EPA. 2008. Estimation Programs Interface Suite™ for Microsoft® Windows, v 3.20. United States

Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA.

http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/exposure/pubs/episuite.htm.

3FR. 1999. Category for Persistent, Bioaccumulative, and Toxic New Chemical Substances. Federal Register 64,
Number 213 (November 4, 1999) Page 60194-60204.

Conclusion: Ethyl (3-methylphenyl)-amino acetonitrile is a clear, colorless liquid at room temperature. Based on
estimated values, the solubility and vapor pressure are considered moderate. It has moderate mobility in soil and
low volatility. The rate of atmospheric photooxidation is rapid. Hydrolysis is expected to be negligible since this
compound does not possess functional groups that hydrolyze under environmental conditions. The rate of
biodegradation is judged to be slow. The persistence of ethyl (3-methylphenyl)-amino acetonitrile is judged to be
moderate (P2) and the bioaccumulation potential is ranked low (Bl).

2. Environmental Effects - Aquatic Toxicity
Acute Toxicity to Fish

Fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) were exposed to ethyl (3-methylphenyl)-amino acetonitrile at nominal
concentrations of 0, 10, 15, 22.5, 33.8 or 50.6 mg/L under semi-static conditions for 96 hours. The measured
concentrations were 0, 9.1, 14, 21.5, 35.6 or 58.8 mg/L, respectively. At 21.5 mg/L, all fish showed depressed
activity after 4 hours of exposure. All fish exposed to the two highest doses died after 4 hours of exposure. None of
the control fish or fish exposed to 9.1 or 14 mg/L died or demonstrated abnormal behavior during the study.
96-h LCS0 = 27.7 mg/L

Acute Toxicity to Aquatic Invertebrates

Daphnia magna were exposed to ethyl (3-methylphenyl)-amino acetonitrile at nominal concentrations of 0, 10, 15,
22.5, 33.8 or 50.6 mg/L under semi-static conditions for 48 hours. The measured concentrations were 0, 9.1, 14,
21.7, 34.1 or 51.6 mg/L, respectively. At 21.7, 34.1 and 51.6 mg/L, 10, 30 and 70% immobilization was noted at 48
hours, respectively. None of the daphnia exposed to the control, 9.1 or 14 mg/L were affected during the study.
48-h ECso=40.0 mg/L

Toxicity to Aquatic Plants

Green algae (Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata) were exposed to ethyl (3-methylphenyl)-amino acetonitrile at
nominal concentrations of 0, 0.625, 1.25, 2.5, 5.0 or 10.0 mg/L for 72 hours. The measured concentrations were 0,
0.37, 0.68, 1.37, 3.16 or 6.51 mg/L, respectively. Exposure to 0.37 and 0.68 mg/L had no significant effect on the
biomass or growth rate at any point during the study. At > 1.37 mg/L, a concentration- and time-dependant
reduction in biomass and inhibition of growth rate were seen.

10


-------
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Supporting Documents for Risk-Based Prioritization

September 2008

72-h EC50 (biomass) = 1.40 mg/L
72-h EC50 (growth) = 2.88 mg/L

Conclusion: The evaluation of available toxicity data indicates that the potential hazard of ethyl (3-methylphenyl)-
amino acetonitrile to fish and aquatic invertebrates is low and to aquatic plants is moderate.

3. Human Health Effects
Acute Oral Toxicity

(1)	Rats (8; sex and strain not specified) were administered ethyl (3-methylphenyl)-amino acetonitrile in corn oil via
gavage at 100 - 800 mg/kg-bw and were observed for 14 days. Mortality occurred from 3 hours to 1 day after
dosing. Clinical signs of toxicity included weakness, vasodilation, sides caved in and ataxia. No significant
findings were noted at necropsy.

LDS0 = 200 - 400 mg/kg-bw

(2)	Mice (10; sex and strain not specified) were administered undiluted ethyl (3-methylphenyl)-amino acetonitrile
via gavage at 50 - 800 mg/kg-bw and observed for 14 days. Mortality occurred within 1 day of treatment. Clinical
signs of toxicity included weakness, vasodilation, rolling, convulsions when handled, tremor and rough coat.
LDS0 = 400 - 800 mg/kg-bw

Acute Dermal Toxicity

Guinea pigs (3; sex and strain not specified) were administered undiluted ethyl (3-methylphenyl)-amino acetonitrile
dermally at 5 - 20 mL/kg-bw (approximately 4910 - 19,640 mg/kg-bw) under occluded conditions for an
unspecified period and observed for 14 days. No animals died. Slight erythema and edema were observed and
cleared by 1 week.

LDS0 > ~ 19,640 mg/kg-bw

Repeated-Dose Toxicity

Data for this endpoint is not required because this chemical is a closed-system intermediate.
Reproductive/Developmental Toxicity

In a combined reproductive/developmental toxicity study, Sprague-Dawley rats (12/sex/dose) were administered
ethyl (3-methylphenyl)-amino acetonitrile via gavage at 0, 25, 75 or 150 mg/kg-bw/day for 14 days prior to mating,
throughout mating, gestation and early lactation. Mean body weight and body weight gains were decreased in mid-
and high-dose males. At the high dose, clinical signs included reduced activity, vasodilation, rapid respiration, wet
fur, transient convulsions and tremors in parental males and fur wet with saliva and vasodilation in parental females.
Transient vasodilation was observed in all males and one female at the mid-dose. No treatment-related changes in
sperm motility, epididymal spermatozoa counts or testicular spermatid counts were observed. There were no effects
on histopathology of reproductive organs, sperm morphology, motility and counts, reproductive performance,
fertility index, fecundity index, precoital interval, gestation duration, numbers of implants, number of corpora lutea,
pre- and post-implantation loss, pup survival, number of live and dead pups, pup sex ratio and pup body weight.
Absolute testes weights were lower in high-dose males, but the biological significance is unclear since there were no
effects on histopathological or sperm parameters.

LOAEL (systemic toxicity) = 75 mg/kg-bw/day (based on decreased body weight in males)

NOAEL (systemic toxicity) = 25 mg/kg-bw/day

NOAEL (maternal toxicity) = 150 mg/kg-bw/day (based on no effects at the highest dose tested)

NOAEL (reproductive/developmental toxicity) = 150 mg/kg-bw/day (based on no effects at the highest dose

tested)

11


-------
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Supporting Documents for Risk-Based Prioritization

September 2008

Genetic Toxicity - Gene Mutation
In vitro

Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535 and TA1537 were exposed to ethyl (3-methylphenyl)-
amino acetonitrile at concentrations of 1 - 1000 |.ig/platc without metabolic activation and 3.33 - 5000 |.ig/platc with
metabolic activation. Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA(pKM101) were exposed to concentrations of 10 - 5000 |.ig/platc
with and without metabolic activation. Positive controls were tested concurrently, but the control responses were
not provided. The cytotoxic concentration was 333 |.ig/platc for Salmonella with and without metabolic activation
and 1000 |.ig/platc for E. coli with metabolic activation and 3330 |.ig/platc for E. coli without metabolic activation.
In one assay, no increases in the number of revertants were observed for any strain with or without metabolic
activation. In a second assay, a 3-fold increase was observed in Salmonella strain TA1537 without metabolic
activation, but the increase was not concentration-dependent and was within the range of historical controls. A
confirmatory assay conducted with only TA1537 without metabolic activation showed no increase in the mean
number of revertants.

Ethyl (3-methylphenyl)-amino acetonitrile was not mutagenic in these assays.

Genetic Toxicity - Chromosomal Aberrations
In vitro

Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells were exposed to ethyl (3-methylphenyl)-amino acetonitrile at concentrations up
to 600 (ig/mL in the presence and absence of metabolic activation for 3 hours in one assay and 19.8 hours in a
second assay. Positive controls were tested concurrently and responded appropriately. The cytotoxic concentration
was between 300 and 400 (ig/mL and precipitation of the test substance was noted at concentrations > 420 (ig/mL.
Ethyl (3-methylphenyl)-amino acetonitrile did not induce chromosomal aberrations in these assays.

Conclusion: In animal studies, acute toxicity of ethyl (3-methylphenyl)-amino acetonitrile is moderate via the oral
route and low via the dermal route of exposure. Data for repeated-dose toxicity is not required for the HPV
Challenge Program because the chemical is considered a closed-system intermediate (CSI). In a combined
reproductive/ developmental study in rats via oral gavage, the chemical is considered moderately toxic, but there
was no evidence of reproductive or developmental toxicity. Ethyl (3-methylphenyl)-amino acetonitrile did not
induce gene mutations or chromosomal aberrations.

12


-------
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Supporting Documents for Risk-Based Prioritization

September 2008

APPENDIX

Summary Tabic of the Screening Information Data Set
as Submitted under the U.S. HPV Challenge Program

Endpoints

SPONSORED CHEMICAL
Ethyl (3-mcthylphcnyl)-amino acctonitrilc
(63133-74-4)

Structure

PT

Summary of Environmental Effects - Aquatic Toxicity Data

Fish

96-h LCS0 (mg/L)

27.7

Aquatic Invertebrates
48-h ECS0 (mg/L)

40

Aquatic Plants
72-h ECS0 (mg/L)

(growth)
(biomass)

2.88
1.40

Summary of Human Health Data

Acute Oral Toxicity
LDS0 (mg/kg-bw)

200 - 400 (rat)
400 - 800 (mice)

Acute Dermal Toxicity
LDS0 (mg/kg-bw)

> ~ 19,640

Repeated-Dose Toxicity
NOAEL/LOAEL
Oral (mg/kg-bw/day)

NA; data not required because chemical is a closed
system intermediate.

Reproductive/Developmental Toxicity

NOAEL/LOAEL

Oral (mg/kg-bw/day)

Systemic Toxicity (male)

Maternal Toxicity
Reproductive/Developmental Toxicity

NOAEL = 25
I.OAF.I. = 75

NO A F.I. = 150

NO A F.I. = 150

Genetic Toxicity - Gene Mutation
In vitro

Negative

Genetic Toxicity - Chromosomal Aberrations
In vitro

Negative

13


-------
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Supporting Documents for Risk-Based Prioritization

September 2008

Screening Level Exposure Characterization for HPV Challenge

Chemical

Ethyl (3-methylphenyl)-amino acetonitrile

CAS # 63133-74-4
September 2008

Prepared by

Exposure Assessment Branch
Chemical Engineering Branch
Economics, Exposure and Technology Division
Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics
Environmental Protection Agency
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20460-0001

14


-------
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Supporting Documents for Risk-Based Prioritization

September 2008

Screening Level Exposure Characterization

Ethyl (3-methylphenyl)-amino acetonitrile (CAS # 63133-74-4)

Non-CBI Executive Summary

Ethyl (3-methylphenyl)-amino acetonitrile (CAS # 63133-74-4) has an aggregated production
and/or import volume in the United States of 10,000 to 500,000 pounds.12 Non-confidential
information in the Inventory Update Reporting (IUR) indicates that this chemical was
manufactured and/or imported at the following companies and sites: Eastman Chemical
Company/Kingsport, TN. There may be other companies and sites that are claimed confidential.
Non-confidential IUR information for this chemical indicates that it is used as an industrial
intermediate. No commercial use is reported in the IUR submissions or other data sources.

Potential for Exposures to Humans and the Environment:

Based on the information considered (including IUR data and information from the HPV
Challenge Program information cited above) and in combination with the Agency's professional
judgment, EPA identifies, for the purposes of risk-based prioritization, a low relative ranking for
each of the potentially exposed groups (including workers, general population, consumers and
children) and the environment. Persistence and bioaccumulation ratings for this chemical are P2
and Bl. These ratings suggest that this chemical is moderately persistent in the environment and
is not bioaccumulative.13 The Agency has reviewed the information in the original and revised/
updated HPV submission or test plan and determined that the HPV chemical satisfies the
guidance to demonstrate that the chemical is a closed system intermediate.14 The chemical is
manufactured and processed in systems that are expected to reduce the potential for worker
exposure and environmental releases that could lead to other human and environmental
exposure. The guidance for identifying this chemical substance as a closed-system intermediate
was satisfied at all sites reporting this chemical in accordance with IUR requirements.

12	USEPA, 2006 Partial Updating of TSCA Chemical Inventory.

13	USEPA, 2008. Screening Level Hazard Characterization for High Production Volume Chemicals, N-Ethyl-N-(3-
methy lpheny l)-aminoacetonitrile.

14	USEPA, 2008. Screening Level Hazard Characterization for High Production Volume Chemicals, N-Ethyl-N-(3-
methy lpheny l)-aminoacetonitrile.

15


-------
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Supporting Documents for Risk-Based Prioritization

September 2008

Non-Confidential IUR Data Summary:

Ethyl (3-methylphenyl)-amino acetonitrile
(CAS #63133-74-4)

Manufacturing/Import Information

Production and import volume:

List of non-CBI companies/sites:
Maximum number of exposed workers:

Highest non-CBI maximum concentration:
Non-CBI physical forms:

10,000 to 500,000 pounds

Eastman Chemical Company/Kingsport, TN*

1,000 or greater (including those of manufacturing,

industrial processing and use) **

up to 90% by weight*

liquid *

* There may be other companies/sites, concentrations and physical forms that are claimed
confidential.

** There may be additional potentially exposed industrial workers that are not included in this
estimate since not all submitters were required to report on industrial processing and use and/or
there may be at least one use that contains a "Not Readily Obtainable" (NRO) response among
the submissions.



Table 1



Industrial Processing and Use Information



Reported in 2006 IUR



Processing Activity

Industrial Sector

Functional Use

Processing as a reactant

Other Basic Organic Chemical
Manufacturing

Intermediates



Table 2





Commercial/Consumer Uses



Reported in 2006 IUR



Commercial/ Consumer

Highest maximum concentration

Use in Children's Products

Product Category Description

range



None reported

16


-------