Can GeoelectricaU Methods Be Used to Monitor NAPL Retried ation? Dale Werkema, U.S. EPA, ORD, NERL, ESD, Las Vegas, NV, werkema.d@epa.gov \A/hl EPA's Strategic Plan includes the research and development of improved methods for evaluating the long-term performance of non-aqueous phase liquid (NAPL) remediation. How? Direct current (DC) geoelectrical methods can detect changes in the electrical properties of the subsurface due to the remediation of light or dense non-aqueous phase liquids (LNAPL or DNAPL). C3 hJ GO "2 o u < DC geoelectrical method? pe = a <|>-mS-npw p e = resistivity of the earth (]) = fractional pore volume (porosity) S = fraction of the pores containing fluid p ; = the resistivity of the fluid n, a and ni are constants Curren source Measured H$H |-0nenti" i| / \ / j Lines of jX j equal potential Current flow lines Measurements within a site will most likely have the same cf>, S, n, a, and m. Therefore, pe a pw or the inverse, conductivity (a), Oe a Ow LNAPL Biodegradation 50 100 Grain Size Conductivity (mS/m) 0 15 30 j Silt/Clay f -A-Sand r -O-GraveI ^-¦w'-Unco nt. i Conductivity [ , ntaminatedo Conductivity I I ~*0~ Microbes | Conductivity (mS/m) 0 15 30 -80 -40 0 % change oil degraders cont. - uncont. I ~ NoLNAPL ~ Residual LNAPL £2 Free LNAPL FH Dissolved LNAPL Anomalously high conductivity coincident with LNAPL zone and high population of oil degrading microbes. £ o O DNAPL Surfactant Remediation Conductivity vs. Surfactant Surfactant mixtures increase water conductivity (Ow). This suggests an increase 111 the geoelectrical conductivity (oe) and shows potential for the indirect geoelectrical measurement of surfactant remediation applications at DNAPL sites. So what? (outcomes) Results suggest DC geoelectrical measurements have the potential to indirectly monitor remediation. Geoelectrical methods may be used by OSWER and Regional Project Managers, for example, to monitor and characterize the remediation of LNAPL and/or DNAPL impacted sites. Furthermore, geoelectrical methods can be utilized as part of an integrated remediation plan because of their cost effective, efficient, and geographically remote acquisition capabilities. Partnerships U.S. EPA, ORD, NERL, ESD Western Michigan University University of Missoun-Rolla Notice: Although this work was reviewed by EPA and approved for publication, it may not necessarily reflect official Agency policy. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation by EPA for use. epascienceforu Collaborative Science for Environmental Solutions ------- |