QNAC

SStSJ Environment and Trade Working Together

GAC

Advisors for a Sustainable Future

OFFICIAL MEETING OF THE
NATIONAL AND GOVERNMENT AL ADVISORY

COMMITTEES

(NAC/GAC)

FINAL SUiMMARY

December 9, 2022

Via Microsoft Teams Virtual Platform
Note: The U.S. National and Governmental Advisory Committees are federal advisory
committees chartered by Congress, operating under the Federal Advisory Committee Act;
5 U.S.C., App. 2. The committees provide advice to the Administrator of the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) on the implementation of the Environmental Cooperation Agreement.
The findings and/or recommendations of the committees do not represent the views of the
Agency, and this document does not represent information approved or disseminated by EPA.

-------
Table of Contents

Call to Order and Introductions	1

Opening Remarks	1

Update on U.S. Priorities and Guidance	1

Welcome and Overview of the Agenda	3

Welcome Back From the CEC	3

Climate Adaptation Goals at EPA	4

Question and Answer Period	4

Public Comment Period	5

Committees Meet Separately to Discuss Charge Questions/Hot Topics Discussion	5

GAC Separate Meeting	5

NAC Separate Meeting	10

Summary and Next Steps	16

Adjournment	16

Action Items	16

Summary Certification	18

Appendix A: Meeting Participants	19

Appendix B: Meeting Agenda	22

Appendix C: Charge Letter for December 9, 2022, NAC/GAC Meeting	24

December 9, 2022, NAC/GAC Meeting Summary	i

-------
Friday, December 9, 2022

Call to Order and Introductions

Clifton Townsend, Acting National Advisory Committee (NAC) and Governmental Advisory Committee
(GAC) Designated Federal Officer (DFO), Federal Advisory Committee Management Division
(FACMD), Office of Resources and Business Operations (ORBO), Office of Mission Support (OMS),
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

Mr. Clifton Townsend, Acting NAC/GAC DFO, FACMD, ORBO, OMS, EPA, called the meeting to
order and welcomed NAC and GAC members and other attendees to the 55th meeting of the NAC and
GAC committees. He explained that he was acting on behalf of Mr. Oscar Carrillo, NAC/GAC DFO,
FACMD, ORBO, OMS, EPA. Mr. Townsend thanked the NAC/GAC Chairs and Vice-Chairs for
assisting in planning the meeting and Ms. Jane T. Nishida, Assistant Administrator, Office of
International and Tribal Affairs (OITA), EPA; Mr. Mark Kasman, Director, Office of Regional and
Bilateral Affairs, OITA, EPA; Ms. NadtyaHong, International Environmental Program Specialist, OITA,
EPA; and Dr. Leslie D'Anglada, Senior Advisor, North America Program, OITA, EPA. Mr. Townsend
expressed appreciation to the entire FACMD team, including Ms. Gina Moore, Acting Director, FACMD,
ORBO, OMS, EPA, and Ms. Robbie Young-Mackall, Acting Director, Administrative Operations
Division, ORBO, OMS, EPA, for ensuring that the resources are made available to support the work of
the committees. Participants were invited to introduce themselves.

Opening Remarks

Gina Moore, Acting Director, FACMD, ORBO, OMS, EPA

Ms. Moore welcomed the NAC/GAC members and other attendees on behalf of Ms. Young-Mackall. She
noted that FACMD, located within OMS, manages the NAC and GAC and provides oversight to 21 other
EPA Federal Advisory Committees. Ms. Moore thanked the members for their intellectual investment in
advising the EPA Administrator on issues related to the Commission for Environmental
Cooperation (CEC). The NAC and GAC provide advice and recommendations to the EPA Administrator
on environmental issues, engage with the Agency's partners and stakeholders, and play an important role
in helping EPA achieve its mission to protect human health and the environment. Ms. Moore expressed
appreciation to Ms. Nashida for her leadership and to OITA staff for their support of these committees.

Update on U.S. Priorities and Guidance

Jane T. Nishida, Assistant Administrator, OITA, EPA

Ms. Nishida, on behalf of EPA Administrator Michael S. Regan, thanked the NAC and GAC members for
participating and dedicating their time and commitment to advising the Agency, as it represents the
U.S. government on the CEC Council. She acknowledged the participation of members from the CEC
Secretariat and Joint Public Advisory Committee (JPAC), who represent Canada, Mexico and the United
States. She presented an update on the Biden administration and EPA priorities related to climate change
and introduced the advice letter charge.

The Biden administration has made a governmentwide commitment to making climate change mitigation
and adaption—as well as environmental justice (EJ) and equity—a priority for federal agencies. This
commitment has been supported by historic levels of funding through the passage of the American
Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA, also called the COVID-19 Stimulus Package), the Infrastructure
Investment and Jobs Act of 2021 (also called the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law [BIL]), and the Inflation
Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA). The Biden administration recognizes that climate change
disproportionately affects communities that have been underserved and historically marginalized and that
the federal government has been directing resources toward these communities. Under IRA, EPA is

December 9, 2022, NAC/GAC Meeting Summary

1

-------
working to establish a $27 billion greenhouse gas reduction fund that will provide competitive grants to
tribal, state and local governments, as well as nonprofit financing institutions, to leverage private capital
for clean energy and climate projects that reduce greenhouse gas emissions, with an emphasis on projects
that benefit low-income and disadvantaged communities. EPA also is investing $53 million in ARPA and
IRA funding to empower 132 communities across the United States with technology to track critical air
quality data. In 2021, EPA released its Climate Adaptation Action Plan, which includes taking necessary
actions to prepare for, adapt to and recover from the impacts of climate change, while at the same time
addressing the climate resilience of tribal, state and local governments and communities across the nation.
A key area of EPA assistance related to climate adaptation is EPA's Climate Adaptation Resource Center.
also referred to as ARC-X, which is an interactive resource that helps tribal, state and local governments
and communities more effectively prepare for and adapt to the effects of climate change. EPA
Administrator Regan has begun a series of Journey to Justice tours, meeting with communities that are
historically and disproportionately impacted by pollution and other long-standing EJ concerns. On
September 30, 2022, Administrator Regan established the Office of Environmental Justice and External
Civil Rights, dedicating more than 200 EPA staff across the country to solving environmental challenges
in underserved communities. On November 30 and December 1, 2022, President Biden convened the
White House Tribal Nations Summit. Administrator Regan joined U.S. Secretary of the Interior
Deb Haaland, U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Thomas J. Vilsack, President of the Central Council of the
Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes of Alaska Richard (Chalyee Eesh) Peterson, and Chairman of the Ute
Mountain Ute Tribe Manuel Heart on a panel to address homeland issues. During the panel,

Administrator Regan announced two important EPA regulatory revisions to recognize tribal rights: a
proposal to protect tribal reserved rights in water-quality standards and best practices for tribal treaty and
reserved rights.

Ms. Nishida pointed out that climate adaptation is a priority for Canada, Mexico and the United States.
Last year, at the North American Leaders Summit, the leaders of these countries issued a joint statement
describing plans to establish a North American Climate Adaptation Initiative under the CEC, which will
work to improve early warning systems for extreme events and promote climate adaptation solutions.
These have been the core activities for the CEC in recent years, with a low-carbon economy being one of
the pillars in the CEC's 2010-2015 strategic plan and climate mitigation and adaptation being a priority
in the 2015-2020 strategic plan. Ms. Nishida highlighted elements of the new strategic plan for
2021-2025. These elements include using remote sensing to prepare for and respond to extreme events;
improving the effectiveness of early warning systems for drought, coastline floods and other extreme
events; and using volunteer observer networks to monitor precipitation and wildfires. The two climate
adaptation projects under the CEC's current operational plan include nature-based solutions to address
flooding in coastal cities and enhancing the co-benefits of marine-protected areas.

Ms. Nishida explained that EPA is requesting the NAC's and GAC's advice on how best to engage key
subnational actors in North America as EPA's climate adaptation initiative—which was announced at the
29th Regular Session of the CEC Council and Meting of the JPAC in July 2022 (CEC29) in Merida,
Mexico—is being developed. Specifically, EPA is asking for advice on models or approaches to facilitate
a broader, more inclusive, more effective engagement with subnational actors in North America. EPA
also would like advice on how to develop a better understanding of the barriers and challenges to ensuring
that national and subnational early warning systems provide the right level of awareness for disaster
preparedness and climate adaptation actions. Finally, EPA would like advice on how to stimulate uptake
of nature-based climate adaptation actions and community early warning systems across North America.

Mr. Townsend invited Mr. Andrew P. Carey (U.S.-Mexico Border Philanthropy Partnership), Chair of
the NAC, and Ms. Marina M. Brock (Barnstable County [Massachusetts] Department of Health and
Environment), Chair of the GAC, to provide an overview of the agenda.

December 9, 2022, NAC/GAC Meeting Summary

2

-------
Welcome and Overview of the Agenda

Marina M. Brock, Barnstable County (Massachusetts) Department of Health and Environment, Chair of
the GAC

Andrew P. Carey, U.S.-Mexico Border Philanthropy Partnership, Chair of the NAC

Ms. Brock and Mr. Carey welcomed everyone and thanked the NAC and GAC members for their
contributions. Mr. Carey noted that he had participated in the previous JPAC meeting virtually and shared
details of community efforts to help support EJ and climate change initiatives among the three nations. He
expressed his enthusiasm for participating in another round of conversations to inform the work of EPA.

Mr. Townsend reviewed and noted some adjustments to the agenda made during the planning phase of the
meeting. To maximize the time spent addressing the charge questions from EPA, the NAC and GAC
Chairs and Vice-Chairs agreed to reduce the number of guest presenters during the session while
recognizing the importance of the information.

Welcome Back From the CEC

Jorge Daniel Taillant, Executive Director, CEC
Louie Porta, Chair, JPAC, CEC

Mr. Jorge Daniel Taillant, Executive Director, CEC, thanked the participants for welcoming him to the
CEC. He described his background as an EJ activist who has experience working on climate policy,
access to justice, and the connection between human rights and the environment. Mr. Taillant discussed
his participation in two recent meetings: the 27th Conference of the Parties of the United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP27) in Sharm El-Sheikh, Egypt, and the 2022 United
Nations Biodiversity Conference of the Parties (COP 15) in Montreal, Canada. The scientific results
presented at COP27 emphasize that acting quickly is essential to avoiding irreversible climate collapse.
Decarbonization strategies alone are not enough. Urgent actions must be taken to rapidly slow warming
and cool the planet while also managing EJ concerns. Tackling climate change and addressing EJ entails
balancing mitigation and adaptation and incorporating Indigenous knowledge to protect the environment
and be more respectful of nature.

Mr. Taillant explained that the CEC is a trilateral forum that can leverage collaborative efforts at this
critical moment. The CEC aims to increase its visibility as a platform that can bring solutions and actors
together, including Indigenous groups, young people and other populations that will be needed to handle
this emergency. He expressed his wishes for more cooperative efforts related to biodiversity, climate
change, and EJ in North America and across the world. Mr. Taillant invited participants to contact the
CEC with input related to the CEC's strategic efforts.

Mr. Louie Porta, Chair, JPAC, CEC, stated that he was attending the virtual meeting from the traditional
unceded territory of the Mi'kmaq people in Nova Scotia, Canada. He discussed several initiatives led by
JPAC. Mr. Porta explained that during its session in Merida, the Council had announced a contribution of
C$300,000 to support a JPAC-led initiative to raise awareness in the three countries about advancing
sustainable forestry and the responsible consumption of wood products. Key features and activities of the
initiative include (1) a comparative analysis of the current nature of forest management certification in
North America, (2) consumer analysis and reports, (3) trinational workshops and a report on the state of
forest management and certification systems, and (4) recommendations for further public awareness
activities.

JPAC also has helped lead a public consultation on the CEC project to create the Communities for

Environmental Justice Network, a network across North America to address EJ concerns. The project will
create a network of vulnerable, disadvantaged or otherwise underserved communities that have

December 9, 2022, NAC/GAC Meeting Summary

3

-------
EJ concerns to increase their local capacities and expand and disseminate community-based expertise,
lessons learned and guidance related to climate change. Through the network, participating communities
will engage in the development of a virtual resource library to facilitate learning and exchange of
knowledge, in particular, traditional knowledge and practices. This library can contribute to strengthening
climate adaptation, mitigation and monitoring and the capacity of Indigenous and vulnerable communities
in Canada, Mexico and the United States.

Mr. Porta announced that during the previous week, JPAC had completed its second independent
consultation on matters of importance to the public (i.e., sustainability, trade and climate action). As
discussed in Merida, JPAC focused on the role of ports in the fight against climate change. JPAC used
Halifax, Canada, as an example of critical challenges and solutions, including port infrastructure,
zero- and low-emission fuels, zero-emission vessels, climate implications of life at the ports, and social
justice issues that people face living at ports. The session was well attended, with in-person and online
communities that were very engaged. Mr. Porta noted that JPAC was pleased to welcome the new CEC
Executive Director, Mr. Taillant, to the meeting. He expressed thanks to the many participants who
represented Indigenous and other communities, including the Traditional Ecological Knowledge Expert
Group (TEKEG). Mr. Porta announced that Dr. Octaviana V. Trujillo, former GAC member, had been
unanimously elected as the new Chair of JPAC.

Climate Adaptation Goals at EPA

Joel Scheraga, Ph.D., Senior Advisor for Climate Adaptation, Climate Change Adaptation Program,
Office of Policy, Office of the Administrator, EPA

In 2021, EPA issued the " Statement by EPA Administrator Regan on the President's Executive Order
Catalyzing America's Clean Energy Economy Through Federal Sustainability" Policy Statement signed
by Administrator Regan and its Climate Adaptation Action Plan. In October 2022, EPA issued 20 climate
adaptation implementation plans developed by its major offices, including regional and program offices,
such as the Office of Policy and Office of Environmental Justice and External Civil Rights, which was
established as a separate program office in September 2022. EPA's Climate Adaptation Action Plan
accelerates and focuses attention on five priority actions that the Agency will undertake during the next 4
years to increase human and ecosystem resilience as the climate changes and disruptive impacts increase:

•	Integrate climate adaptation into EPA programs, policies, rulemaking processes and enforcement
activities.

•	Consult and partner with tribes, states, territories, local governments, EJ organizations,
community groups, businesses and other federal agencies to strengthen adaptive capacity and
increase the resilience of the nation, with a particular focus on advancing EJ.

•	Implement measures to protect EPA's workforce, facilities, critical infrastructure, supply chains
and procurement processes from the risks posed by climate change.

•	Measure and evaluate performance.

•	Identify and address climate adaptation science needs.

Question and Answer Period

Ms. Simone Sagovac (Southwest Detroit Community Benefits Coalition), NAC member, asked how
ARPA funds are being tracked locally to ensure that they are benefiting the areas most affected by
COVID-19 and its pollution-related effects. She also asked how competitive grants are being awarded to

December 9, 2022, NAC/GAC Meeting Summary

4

-------
ensure that the most affected areas receive funding. Ms. Nishida responded that dedicated staff within
EPA track ARPA, BIL and IRA funding at the national and regional levels. She noted that, regarding the
new IRA funds, the Biden administration has made investing in underserved and marginalized
communities a priority for the U.S. government. The Justice40 Initiative—under which all federal
agencies must invest at least 40 percent of their resources in disadvantaged communities that are
marginalized or underserved—is a conscious effort to direct resources to communities that have been
disproportionately affected by pollution.

Ms. Ann Marie Chischilly, Esq., (Northern Arizona University), Vice-Chair of the NAC, asked for more
details related to the rollout of the new tribal initiatives. Ms. Nishida explained that each agency at the
White House Tribal Nations Summit provided a report to the tribal leaders that included their agency's
accomplishments and deliverables.

Dr. David T. Dyjack (National Environmental Health Association [NEHA]), NAC member, asked for
more information about the 40 percent of resources mandated by the Justice40 Initiative. Ms. Nishida
answered that the division and recipients of the 40-percent funding will vary by agency, but these funds
likely will be invested in tribal governments, cities and other local communities.

Public Comment Period

No public comments were offered.

Committees Meet Separately to Discuss Charge Questions/Hot Topics Discussion

Mr. Townsend explained that the NAC and GAC would meet separately to deliberate on the EPA charge
questions.

GAC Separate Meeting

Ms. Brock reminded the GAC members of Charge Question #1 and the related project objectives and
opened the discussion; the CEC needs the GAC's advice regarding facilitating a broader, more inclusive
and more effective engagement of key subnational actors in North America in the shaping the CEC's
development of its climate adaptation initiative.

Mr. Erich A. Morales (El Paso County Attorney's Office), GAC member, sought clarity on the definition
of subnational actors and wondered whether the phrase was meant to include those who work outside of
government. Ms. Brock affirmed that subnational actors could be anyone with relevant knowledge and
recommendations. Mr. Morales asked whether EPA was seeking mechanisms for inclusion or the names
of groups or individuals to contact. Ms. Nadtya Y. Hong, International Environmental Program Specialist,
Latin America and Caribbean Program, OITA, EPA, and CEC General Standing Committee member,
answered that EPA was soliciting suggestions for inclusion mechanisms and party names.

Ms. Debra L. Kring (City of Mission, Kansas), GAC member, commented that EPA should be in
communication with academic groups, including universities and elementary schools. Ms. Hong agreed
and mentioned a large project that the CEC conducted in partnership with The University of Oklahoma
National Weather Center.

Mr. Morales asked whether the participants should create a categorized list of potential partners.

Ms. Hong asked for examples of how to coordinate with different groups (e.g., universities versus
nongovernmental organizations [NGOs]) depending on the groups' priorities, in addition to limitations
associated with each type of partnership. She added that EPA also was seeking advice on how to adapt
early warning systems to different regions based on the different hazards to which they are vulnerable.

December 9, 2022, NAC/GAC Meeting Summary

5

-------
Mr. Robert Janecka (Texas Commission on Environmental Quality), GAC member, commented that
subnational actors generally do not have as many resources as actors at the state and federal level. He
added that requests to subnational actors should be communicated in a clear and concise manner so as not
to burden these groups further. For example, communication with subnational actors should include an
explanation of what is being translated to their level, what knowledge is expected from them, and why
they are being included in a particular effort.

Ms. Hong emphasized that communication between subnational groups and those at the state and federal
levels should not move in a single direction.

Ms. Sally Ann Gonzales (Arizona State Senate), GAC member, pointed out that in Arizona, Indigenous
groups involved in environmental efforts often are considered hostile to the government and are not
included in governmental efforts. She provided the examples of several Indigenous groups protesting
mining in the San Carlos Apache Indian Reservation, Oak Flat, and locations in northern Arizona. She
mentioned Alianza Indigena Sin Barrens, a group that works on environmental and immigration issues
along the border with Mexico, and Las Aguas. a group of homeow ners and community members working
on water contamination in the Tucson, Arizona, area. Ms. Gonzales commented that these groups have
traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) and other knowledge that would be of great value to EPA. She
added that the Sierra Clubs of various states also have information about ongoing efforts in their regions.
Mr. Janecka agreed that outreach from Sierra Clubs to community groups would be welcomed.

Dr. June Weintraub (San Francisco Department of Public Health [SFDPH]), GAC member, agreed with
Ms. Gonzales about certain groups being perceived as adversaries. She added that, in her experience with

the National Advisory Council for Environmental Policy and Technology groups, established
decision-makers were upset by advocacy groups' collecting information and using it to support policy
changes. Dr. Weintraub suggested that academic groups might be able to bridge this gap between
establishment and advocacy groups.

Ms. Brock commented that unique personalities are required to facilitate connection and engagement
between different groups. She connected this idea to previous comments from Ms. Hong about receiving
feedback from community members and from Mr. Janecka about clear communication with subnational
actors, both of which require an understanding of the culture and values of those groups.

Dr. Weintraub commented that a former colleague, Ms. Laurie Schoeman, had just been appointed by the
Biden administration as the Senior Advisor for Climate Resilience on the Council on Environmental
Quality. She added that Ms. Schoeman—with her experience in San Francisco, New York City and
Puerto Rico—and others in similar positions would be useful partners. Dr. Weintraub discussed flooding
issues in San Francisco that currently are being addressed by SFDPH in conjunction with such local
partners as the Port of San Francisco and San Francisco Public Utilities Commission. She also described
the California Mandatory Recycling Laws, which require large supermarkets and restaurants to recycle
and compost edible food, as well as require the donation of edible food to food recovery organizations.
Dr. Weintraub noted the bureaucratic challenge of implementing these laws, which require enforcement
by SFDPH.

Mr. Morales agreed with previous suggestions to consult with subnational groups to learn about their
priorities, ongoing efforts and requirements.

Mr. Kelly C. Wright (Shoshone-Bannock Tribes), GAC member, commented that outreach to Indigenous
leadership has often been ineffective in reaching different levels of tribal governance and membership.
Ms. Brock asked Mr. Wright for suggestions about how to bridge this communication gap. Mr. Wright
recommended that EPA perform outreach in newspapers and other forms of communication that reach
more people. He described his work with the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,

December 9, 2022, NAC/GAC Meeting Summary

6

-------
and Liability Act, which requires active community involvement. Mr. Wright contacts each district in his
area personally and offers to present the information to them. He added that building relationships and
trust with Indigenous groups would be essential before expecting them to share TEK.

Ms. Brock and Ms. Hong discussed possible reasons that EPA was unable to communicate with multiple
levels of tribal membership. Ms. Hong pointed out that much of the outreach to the tribal groups was
coming from the CEC, which has recognized the communication problem and has begun more expansive
efforts to improve in this area. She described the CEC's EMOimate Grant Program to fund projects in
underserved and vulnerable communities (including Indigenous communities) in Canada, Mexico and the
United States to help them prepare for climate-related effects. Ms. Hong commented that the program
received many more proposals than usual and attributed the increased interest to expanded CEC
communication efforts, including amplification of messaging through EPA offices and communication
with tribal groups and historically Black colleges and universities. Ms. Brock and Ms. Hong discussed
outreach efforts by EPA, including the Administrator's Journey to Justice tour, which has been well
received by the general population because people want to be heard.

Ms. Julia S. Moore (Vermont Agency of Natural Resources), GAC member, offered reflections on her
ongoing work. After adopting the Global Wanning Solutions Act of 2020 and California's Advanced
Clean Car II and Advanced Clean Tracks standards, Vermont has altered its public engagement process.
Instead of requesting input on the rulemaking process, the state has requested that members of the public
describe what they require from state and local governments to implement the new rule packages.
Ms. Moore explained that the solicited feedback has provided insight into the practical impacts of these
rules on the community. Ms. Moore provided examples the public's concerns about incentive programs to
help purchase electric vehicles. People want to know where to charge these vehicles when they park on
the street or how to make purchases if they do not have a credit card. Ms. Brock agreed that governments
should continually improve their administrative processes. She noted that many government agencies
operate within silos and do not communicate well with one another to coordinate public engagement
efforts.

Ms. Brock introduced Charge Question #2, which solicits input on developing a better understanding of
the barriers and challenges to ensuring that national and subnational early warning systems provide the
right level of awareness for disaster preparedness and climate adaptation actions. Ms. Brock described her
experience as an emergency management specialist and noted the challenge of integrating mitigation into
emergency management, which historically has been focused on responding to emergencies rather than
preventing them.

Mr. Morales sought to clarify whether Charge Question #2 referred to literal warning systems
(e.g., alarms) or communicating information related to disasters. Ms. Hong commented that EPA was
open to suggestions about either type of warning system.

Ms. Gonzales pointed out that rural Indigenous communities are unable to communicate with the types of
warning systems that are available in large cities and municipalities. She described challenges with the
current drought in Arizona, including the lack of communication about the dangers of insufficient water
supply and the lack of water conservation efforts to mitigate the effects of the drought.

Mr. Orlando Cabrera-Rivera, CEC, provided context regarding early warning systems. He explained that
these systems combine observations and data into models that generate useful information at the local
level. Mr. Cabrera-Rivera added that many of the barriers in these systems prevent people from receiving
the right information at the right time. He provided the example of efforts in collaboration with the Pinal
County Public Health Department in Arizona, which found that people between the ages of 19 and 25 and
people experiencing homelessness were the populations most likely visit the emergency room during
extreme heat events. To reach people most experiencing the effects of extreme heat, the health department

December 9, 2022, NAC/GAC Meeting Summary

7

-------
engaged with the United Way, which already was serving the homeless population. Mr. Cabrera-Rivera
emphasized that early warning systems should be connected with local health and social services
organizations to reach the populations that will be most affected.

Ms. Brock commented that she considers audible alarms to be early warning systems. She asked
Mr. Cabrera-Rivera whether he was referring to sirens or wider surveillance systems. Mr. Cabrera-Rivera
responded that both elements are part of the communication process. He provided an example of National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) colleagues' providing their counterparts in Mexico
with satellite information about soil moisture content prior to Hurricane Gamma in October 2020. This
information was vital to first responders, who needed to predict areas that were susceptible to flooding.
He noted that many early warning systems are not complete because they contain barriers impeding the
effective flow of information. Ms. Brock wondered whether subnational stakeholders should include
those involved in soil conservation surveys and agricultural and related agencies. Mr. Cabrera described
an app created in Canada that enables any community member to upload pictures of a flooded area, which
can then be compiled with satellite observation data to inform early warning systems.

Ms. Brock and Mr. Cabrera-Rivera discussed how strengthening ties between state, regional and local
organizations would improve early warning systems. For example, increases in heat-related injuries in
emergency departments could be communicated to public health departments, which, in turn, could
inform agencies at the regional and state levels. Mr. Cabrera-Rivera noted that many barriers remain in
this area. For example, during extreme heat, people tend to stay home rather than visiting cooling centers.
Public health agencies should figure out why community members are hesitant to visit the centers and
also how to communicate with these people if they are staying home. Ms. Brock added that these
challenges also will vary from community to community and will depend on outreach resources available.

Mr. Cabrera-Rivera re-emphasized the need for building trust with Indigenous communities before
requesting that they provide information for use in surveillance or management projects. Ms. Brock
agreed. She requested that GAC members provide her with the names of specific individuals or agencies,
NGOs, or academic groups that would be beneficial to engage. She noted that the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) changes flood maps only retroactively and asked for more information
about the real-time data collection capabilities of the Canadian flood app. Mr. Cabrera-Rivera explained
that the app was built by Natural Resources Canada. He noted that the CEC recently published
recommendations for improving flood data collection in North America, which is not well coordinated
among the three countries. For example, remote communities in Mexico are not included in official
registers, and loss of housing in these areas during floods is not recorded. In Canada and the United
States, multiple agencies collect flood damage data, but not all of this information reaches the national
level of government for impact estimations.

Ms. Brock asked Mr. Cabrera-Rivera how these barriers were discovered. Mr. Cabrera-Rivera responded
that these gaps became clear during a CEC Drought Summit convened in September 2020. He explained
that the summit included breakout groups categorized by country and noted that, in his group, it was the
first time that local Canadian drought managers had met with their federal counterparts.

Ms. Brock commented that a contact at the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) had expressed
frustration about the lack of EPA efforts in area of disaster mitigation. She asked Ms. Hong whether this
challenge was being addressed at EPA. Ms. Hong requested that Ms. Brock forward contact information
for the DHS colleague to her. Ms. Hong also offered to work with her counterparts at NOAA, who also
are interested in getting involved in disaster mitigation efforts.

Mr. Wright commented that a major barrier for early warning systems in Indigenous communities is the
lack of electronic and internet capabilities. Fort Hall Reservation, the reservation of the federally
recognized Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, is more than 500,000 acres in size and does not have full access to

December 9, 2022, NAC/GAC Meeting Summary

8

-------
electricity or cell phone reception. He noted that, especially in snowy areas, the weather also can be a
challenge. Ms. Brock asked about how communications are facilitated in an area that large. Mr. Wright
answered that messages must be relayed to remote areas, such as Bannock Creek, in person. Only some
residents have landline telephones. Although an emergency management team exists to coordinate
emergency responses, residents are actively involved in communicating important information to one
another. Mr. Wright added that the nuclear reactor located at nearby Idaho National Laboratory also poses
a significant hazard to the reservation.

Ms. Brock introduced Charge Question #3, which solicits input on stimulating uptake of nature-based
climate adaptation actions and community early warning systems at the subnational level across North
America.

Mr. Janecka commented that, similar to soil moisture evaluations, snowpack assessments are important
for flood hazard and water availability planning. He agreed that early warning systems should consist of
two-way communication between communities and larger organizations but not use language
(e.g., nature-based) that could be off-putting to some legislative decision-makers. As a model for
consideration and reference, Mr. Janecka highlighted Texas A&M University's Ike Dike, which has been
a successful climate adaptation solution in the state of Texas.

Mr. Erich Morales commented that early warning systems should consider the language needs of the
intended recipients of the warning. He mentioned, for example, Indigenous communities and populations
that speak English as a second language or speak only Spanish. Mr. Morales described another challenge
related to water utilities in the city of El Paso, which provides water to disadvantaged colonias.
Mr. Morales explained that the water contract with these communities stipulates that during emergencies,
the water utilities will be shut off in the colonias first. He added that these communities also have been
discouraged from developing their own centralized groundwater system. Mr. Morales agreed that
landlines would be a useful component of early warning systems and noted that during large power
outages, the small water districts were at an advantage because they relied on landlines rather than cell
phones.

Mr. Cabrera-Rivera agreed that snowpack was a useful metric for flood and drought hazard assessments.
He and Ms. Brock agreed that each community is different and should perform an assessment of its
unique vulnerabilities. Ms. Brock mentioned that FEMA has generated a hazard vulnerability map of the
United States and made it available to the public. She pointed out that specific geographical regions often
share hazard vulnerabilities; these areas can cooperate in hazard planning and mitigation efforts, which
would reduce redundancies and strengthen local networks.

Mr. Leonard Drago (Arizona Department of Environmental Quality), GAC member, suggested using the
Inner Tribal Council of Arizona, a group that represents 21 of the 22 federally recognized tribes in
Arizona, to communicate to the tribal community. He commented that remote sensors can be beneficial
when integrated into early warning systems.

Ms. Moore commented that, in the wake of Tropical Storm Irene's hitting Vermont in 2011, the state has
worked with FEMA to ensure that infrastructure maintenance meets the state's newly adopted set of
codes and standards. Vermont has been prioritizing transportation investments to enlarge undersized
culverts and bridges to prevent flooding. The state is working on green infrastructure and promoting
wetland restoration for the triple benefit of habitat improvement, water quality improvement and climate
resilience. Vermont recently created a municipal vulnerability index to help towns evaluate how
climate-ready they are. The state will be working with smaller communities to help apply that tool
directly and then apply for grant funds to address their most significant vulnerabilities. Vermont also is
assessing the hazards posed by increasingly hot summers, more numerous algal blooms, and an increase
in the tick population and tick-borne illnesses.

December 9, 2022, NAC/GAC Meeting Summary

9

-------
Ms. Brock thanked the members for their support and adjourned the separate meeting of the GAC.
NAC Separate Meeting

Mr. Carey opened the NAC discussion to Charge Question # 1. He first invited attendees to introduce
themselves.

Mr. James Marston (Marston Sustainability Consulting), NAC member, emphasized including cities and
highlighted groups of interest, such as the Municipal League. Mr. Marston remarked that that some states,
for political or ideological reasons, tend to act more slowly than others on climate and climate adaptation
issues, and he suggested reaching out to representatives from all political parties.

Dr. Dyjack suggested adding two groups active at the local level: the National Association of County and
City Health Officials, which represents city health officials throughout the United States, and NEHA,
which has constituents with environmental health expertise throughout the nation, U.S. territories,
uniformed services and private sector.

Dr. Vincent R. Nathan (Center for Houston's Future), NAC member, called attention to the National
Academy of Medicine's formation of the Action Collaborative on Decarbonizing the U.S. Health Sector
(Climate Collaborative). Three working groups—Health Care Supply Chain and Infrastructure, Health
Professional Education and Communication, and Health Care Delivery—have been launched within the
Climate Collaborative, and Dr. Nathan remarked that their work on decarbonization would be applicable
to CEC's climate change initiatives and this charge.

Ms. Erica Ocampo (The Metals Company), NAC member, recommended the American Planning
Association, whose members are urban planners in different cities who implement adaptation strategies,
and the Bloomberg Harvard City Leadership Initiative, composed of city specialists trained in this type of
work.

Ms. Sagovac noted two different conferences—Smart Cities Connect and Growing Sustainable
Communities—that convened cities and municipalities and might offer occasions to identify others
already doing this work. Ms. Sagovac noted that, at the local level, climate-related conferences may
attract organizations focused on climate change, such as the Michigan Environmental Justice Coalition.
Organizations at the grassroots level with policy engagement expertise also may exist and provide
opportunities to connect (e.g., a collaboration between local communities and legislators in Michigan to
form climate commitments). She also mentioned the Michigan Climate Action Network and similar
groups of interest.

Ms. Jennifer J. Ronk (The Dow Chemical Company), NAC member, noted ICLEI-Local Governments
for Sustainability (formerly International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives), a global network
of local governments that specifically works with cities interested in sustainability.

Dr. Antonio A. Rene (Texas A&M University School of Public Health), NAC member, offered the
example of religious-based organizations in Fort Worth, Texas, composed of several congregations that
convene to address issues relevant to them, one of which is climate change. Similar groups in other
U.S. cities also may be addressing this topic.

Ms. Chischilly called attention to several groups: Institute for Tribal Environmental Professionals (ITEP)
at Northern Arizona University, National Indian Collectives, and National Congress of American Indians.
Ms. Chischilly will compile a list of other groups representing Indigenous peoples with which to connect.

December 9, 2022, NAC/GAC Meeting Summary

10

-------
Mr. Carey suggested creating a directory of the various groups (i.e., key subnational actors in North
America) in the three countries—Canada, Mexico and the United States—of which the CEC should be
aware and with which it can interact or connect; the members agreed with this suggestion. Other
suggestions for a North American directory for the CEC were proposed, including providing a point of
contact for the groups and considering business groups interested in environmental issues. Ms. Sagovac
agreed to initiate a Google Doc to collect the information and will forward the draft directory to
Mr. Townsend to circulate to the committees for input. Dr. Aminata P. Kilungo (The University of
Arizona), NAC member, suggested considering groups along the Arizona/U.S.-Mexico border that
equally represent both sides of the boundary.

Dr. Donna L. Lybecker (Idaho State University), NAC member, spoke on land trust partnerships active in
rural areas (e.g., Heart of the Rockies Initiative) that address environmental issues, such as climate
change. Dr. Nathan added that the Community Collaborative Rain. Hail and Snow Network (CoCoRaHS)
is using low-cost measurement tools to determine contamination (e.g., of crops) from rain, hail and snow
in areas not currently being monitored. He commented that EPA may have information on CoCoRaHS,
which is a citizen-based network composed of representatives from the Commonwealth of The Bahamas,
Canada and the United States, and is now in all 50 states. Dr. D'Anglada was not aware of this group but
will share this information with her OITA colleagues.

Mr. Carey pointed out that U.S.-Mexico border wait times are creating significant community challenges
related to environmental issues that affect businesses. He called attention to some business groups that are
engaged in such discussions. These include the Arizona-Mexico Commission, Borderplex Alliance,
Border Trade Alliance, Smart Border Coalition and Texas Border Coalition.

Dr. Kilungo attended COP27 and noted some key deliberations and gaps. Mitigation and adaptation by
reducing carbon dioxide and increasing green energy was a major topic, which fits with EPA's Climate
Adaptation Action Plan. The integration of human health into climate change initiatives was not observed.
Dr. Kilungo commented on how health also can serve as an approach to address climate justice, especially
for underserved communities. In addition, Dr. Kilungo has been asked to present on this topic during the
2023 Bonn Climate Change Conference, and she and Mr. Carey invited the NAC to provide comments.

Dr. Dyjack reiterated the rich resource of local governmental environmental health professionals, noting
that health professionals are trusted by local constituents and can serve as natural communicators on
health who understand the culture and risks at the local level. He suggested that EPA assume the role of
facilitator to engage this group. Mr. Carey suggested providing a framework for the advice letter,
outlining the addition of health and the challenge of connecting it to the environment.

Dr. Nathan pointed out that early warning systems can be used as health alert indicators of viruses and
other types of diseases that can sometimes be weather related. The Climate Collaborative is one group to
model for linking health and the environment.

Mr. Carey noted that when people fly into the Tijuana airport near the U.S.-Mexico border, a terminal
allows them to cross the border wall into the United States. The U.S.-Mexico Border Philanthropy
Partnership, in collaboration with the San Francisco and Los Angeles airports and the Cross Border
Express, has conducted more than 10,000 voluntary COVID-19 tests among international travelers at this
port of entry. Six new SARS-CoV-2 variants have been identified, and this type of early warning system,
taking the form of COVID-19 testing, has informed California public policy.

Ms. Chischilly asked whether the charge was asking how to engage as well as communicate with these
groups more effectively, such as via email or social media, particularly with tribes. Mr. Carey explained
that the NAC is free to make those suggestions and noted that one strength of this committee is a high
level of cultural competence.

December 9, 2022, NAC/GAC Meeting Summary

11

-------
Members discussed best practices for engaging with tribal communities. In the Northern Arizona region,
Facebook is one of the best engagement mechanisms for tribes; the younger generations are moving
toward Instagram. Any brochures or materials developed should be accessible on cell phones. Town hall
meetings have worked best for broadly engaging underserved communities. Mr. Carey commented on the
need to encourage EPA to use demonstrated successful strategies to reach marginalized and vulnerable
communities so that critical messages are received in the future.

Mr. Carey highlighted the North American Partnership for Environmental Community Action (NAPECA)
grants totaling more than $1 million that the CEC could advertise on Facebook pages sponsored by tribal
communities. Ms. Ronk added that providing incentives to community partners (e.g., childcare services)
is one way to potentially increase participation in the NAPECA grant projects.

Dr. Rene commented on two issues to be overcome: (1) a lack of trust within these communities about EJ
issues brought about by unfulfilled promises and (2) the knowledge gap about the environmental issues.

Mr. Carey moved the discussion to Charge Question #2. Ms. Ocampo spoke on the fundamental
understanding of climate risks and challenges and adaptation to the level of trust that would prompt the
governments to promote change in the lives of people. Although many are open to trust and will follow
guidance, large populations exist within the three countries that do not believe or understand climate
change and continue to consider it a hoax.

Mr. Marston explained that many cities do not understand climate adaptation because they feel there is no
hope, it is impossible, or climate change is God's will. He suggested that it would be helpful for EPA and
border commissions to provide a summary of climate-related activities already in progress within
communities along the borders, such as wind or solar-powered desalinization. In addition, he explained
that wind and solar power often are available in border regions and that desalinization can be performed
at any time of the day rather than during peak electrical usage periods.

Dr. Dyjack commented that public health speaks to the "what" and, to a lesser extent, the "who" in terms
of adaptation. He remarked on trust at the local level and the need to address misinformation and
disinformation in communities and made several key points. Individuals who have gained trust at the
local level need to take on the role and responsibility of addressing disinformation and misinformation in
real time. The public often reacts to truth distortions instead of staying ahead of them. It is imperative to
have the right spokespeople who are trusted rather than someone who shows up at an opportune time.
Such spokespeople are those who permanently reside in those communities; have good relationships with
the residents; and understand the culture, risks and local vernacular. It would be a good investment of
resources to ensure that community representatives have the appropriate tools to act accordingly and
sustainably. Dr. Dyjack volunteered to check the NEHA network for a list of such tools.

Ms. Ronk pointed out that communities need better ways of assessing overall risk and evaluating the
infrastructure risk using the appropriate tools. She suggested having common tools that can be broadly
used along with community engagement to help prioritize the most important adaptation approaches.

Ms. Chischilly reminded the NAC that ITEP released the Status of Tribes and Climate Change Report.
which contains an overview and 40 narratives on climate change initiatives and solutions, as well as the
recommendations of 34 U.S. tribes. This inaugural report has been vetted, is a one-of-a-kind resource, is
supported by EPA's 10 regions, will be updated every 2 years, and is cited in the Fifth National Climate
Assessment.

In terms of building awareness about adaptation, emergency preparedness and planning, Dr. Kilungo
emphasized integrating new information with which most people at the community level are less familiar.

December 9, 2022, NAC/GAC Meeting Summary

12

-------
She suggested building workforce training in these areas, noting a role for universities and other
educational institutions to include certifications and curricula related to emergency response.

Mr. Carey clarified that intentional attacks on systems and infrastructures (e.g., North Carolina substation
attacks) activate an emergency response and illustrate part of the problem being faced today.

Ms. Sagovac wondered whether it would increase attention and the level of activity if EPA were to rely
heavily on grassroots organizations to lead the efforts or offer grants to support emergency planning for
local communities to explore the barriers, rather than respond to crises (e.g., refinery fires, polar vortex).
She noted that leadership would be necessary to mobilize the various communities.

Dr. Dyjack called attention to the existing efforts in the emergency preparedness and response space that
should be harmonized and aligned with additional EPA investment to produce the maximum return on
those investments.

Members discussed early warning systems and how the challenges in tribal communities are not well
understood. Early warning systems are limited in rural areas and should be expanded in these
communities. It is important to stay ahead of potential disasters (e.g., hurricanes, tornadoes) by providing
the necessary preparedness information well in advance of such events. Proactive measures, such as
placing wind alert sensors in California's Santa Ana Canyon, have been successful.

Mr. Carey moved the discussion to Charge Question #3. Ms. Sagovac spoke on the decreasing tree
canopy in Metropolitan Detroit because residents are cutting down mature trees to avoid the damage
caused when they fall onto their properties. Local and national programs to replace trees are low scale.
Educating the public about the value of mature trees to urban areas is essential. Ms. Ocampo commented
that city and urban planners would play a role in the actions of this charge because of the city codes and
demands of new construction.

Ms. Ronk underscored the significance of collecting data related to nature-based solutions to mitigating
storm damage and communicating the importance of these data, so that people understand the value and
make necessary choices and investments.

Dr. Dyjack noted the need to do a better job of using endemic plants that are effective at mitigating
today's extreme weather events. He also highlighted use of TEK and the TEKEG, whose members
represent the three countries, and suggested engaging this group in the discussions of this charge.

Ms. Chischilly called attention to the November 30, 2022, Presidential memorandum titled
"Implementation of Guidance for Federal Departments and Agencies on Indigenous Knowledge," which
requires all federal agencies to incorporate Indigenous TEK into federal projects. This guidance ensures
protection of positional knowledge when working with Indigenous peoples, as well as their traditional
knowledge, which is their intellectual property.

Ms. Sagovac noted relevant forestry initiatives, including a planting project in Detroit that balances local
tree species with offerings from southern states and Europe that are capable of withstanding warmer
temperatures.

Mr. Carey called attention to two issues related to climate change along the borderlands that required
mitigation. First, dust clouds linked to human cancers are created when city sidewalks or roads in
impoverished communities are not allowed to properly drain. Engineering efforts are in place to raise the
sidewalks to enable sufficient runoff. Second, food insecurity rates are high along border regions, with the
highest in developing countries, such as Guatemala. In this region, one in five children younger than age 5

December 9, 2022, NAC/GAC Meeting Summary

13

-------
is afflicted with chronic malnutrition. Strategies from sub-Saharan Africa are being implemented in
Guatemala to teach these communities how to adapt and grow new food sources.

Dr. Rene commented on the need to establish greener zones in urban areas, where the heat and heat index
disproportionately affect minority communities who live in these settings.

Hot Topics Discussion

Mr. Carey opened the discussion to environmental topics of interest relevant to members' geographical
regions or industries. He invited NAC members to present their hot topics, which could be considered in
formulating recommendations for the advice letter.

Decarbonizing Air Travel

Dr. Rene reported that Great Britain's Rolls-Royce recently tested a new hydrogen-powered jet engine.
Because of the large jet aircraft industry worldwide, this testing will have a broad impact on
decarbonization. Flight testing is the next step for this engine. The good news is that the hydrogen is
produced through electrolysis of water and powered by renewable energy, thus creating net-zero
emissions. In terms of seeking alternative green fuel in this industry, Dr. Rene considers this a hot topic
for the CEC and EPA.

Sustainable Aviation Fuel

Mr. Marston explained that IRA funding is being used to sponsor a series of large grants to support
various sources of sustainable aviation fuel. The fuels extend from wood gas to natural gas. Significant
investments will flow into private dollars, but the U.S. Department of Transportation will be providing a
number of IRA-funded grants.

Reduction of Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Electrification of Vehicles

Ms. Ocampo reported that IRA is supporting the goal of the United States and other countries to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions via electrification of vehicles. The target of this effort is 50 percent of sales of
new vehicles to be electric by 2030. A significant investment in manufacturing such vehicles in the
United States has resulted. IRA stipulates that no metals may be purchased from non-trade partners, but
these companies are the major producers of raw materials used in the United States. The aim is to identify
local suppliers of critical minerals because this industry currently is monopolized by China and Russia.
This issue has been atopic of discussion in the U.S. Department of Defense and the agenda for
decarbonization. Ms. Ocampo remarked on the urgency of having mineral independence to enable the
transition to decarbonization.

Electric Vehicle Charging Stations at Ports of Entry

Mr. Carey presented topics of concern along the Arizona-Mexico border on behalf of Mr. Luis E.
Ramirez Thomas (Ramirez Advisors Inter-National, LLC), NAC member, who was unable to attend this
meeting. Mr. Thomas is collaborating with the North American Development Bank (NADBank), Arizona
Department of Transportation, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, state of Sonora (Mexico),
and industry representatives to deploy a pilot program to use electric trucks at the U.S.-Mexico border,
specifically Nogales/Douglas, Arizona. Funding will be needed to defray some of the costs of this project.
Complicating matters is the fact that the General Services Administration is installing electric vehicle
charging stations at ports of entry, but these are only for use by federal government fleets and not for
public use. This restriction indicates a greater need to deploy additional electric vehicle charging stations
at ports of entry in small communities across the rural borderlands. Mr. Thomas and his team are seeking

December 9, 2022, NAC/GAC Meeting Summary

14

-------
to work with the CEC to increase awareness about grant opportunities to support studies to help increase
the availability and marketability of the installation of electric vehicle infrastructure across the
borderlands, especially in tribal communities and other vulnerable communities where they are
nonexistent.

Clean Drinking Water

Dr. Dyjack reminded attendees that the issue of clean drinking water (in different places and different
ways) in the United States has profound significance on the health and economic security of all people.
The Colorado River drainage basin remains an environmental concern that may not get better any time
soon. Aquifers throughout the United States are becoming increasingly depleted. These issues point to the
need for a national discussion on this topic, and the NAC is one place to begin.

Mr. Carey explained that this topic was discussed during the September 2022 Environmental Summit
hosted by NADBank. Summit participants highlighted that the increases in droughts, population and
demand, coupled with the decrease in water supply, are creating large challenges in drinking water. The
Mexican Water Treaty of 1944 manages how critical, scarce resources are shared between the United
States and Mexico. Water is polluted on both sides of the border. As described in the public comments of
the April 2022 NAC and GAC meeting, EPA recently announced a $300 million investment to address
the San Diego-Tijuana river cleanup; Mexico is contributing $275 million toward this effort.

Ms. Chischilly noted other drinking water issues related to the Colorado River and the effect on tribal
communities. As a former water rights attorney, she worked on a case involving tribes and water rights
issues that was settled in 2007. The U.S. Department of the Interior, under Secretary Haaland, is putting
forth significant funding to ensure that water rights are reserved or adjudicated for tribes. The focus also
is to find unique methods for working with urban communities to find equitable use of water.

Funding for Tribes, Adaptation to Implementation and Other Issues

Ms. Chischilly reported working with more than 200 tribes on building climate adaptation plans, but
funding for implementation is lacking. The protection of lands and water pipelines remains a large
concern. Natural resource extraction is one of the major issues that concerns tribes because it impacts not
only their lands, but also surrounding lands, including aquifers. Training for tribes and the younger
generation is another major concern, as well as conservation and collaborative management of national
parks, which largely were tribal lands. River dam removals are restoring waters for tribal nations,
particularly the with the largest removal project in Klamath, California, and the Yurok Tribe.

Rainwater Harvesting

Dr. Kilungo pointed out that several initiatives related to rainwater harvesting to supplement water uses
are ongoing in the United States and other countries. For example, some cities in Australia rely heavily on
this process. Tucson sponsors a rebate program through which the city provides $2,000 to homeowners
and small commercial water users to retrofit and install rainwater harvesting systems. She emphasized the
importance of building systems to supplement water use, suggesting that this method is one such
approach.

Lower Colorado River Desert

Dr. Nathan explained that in Arizona and other places, because the lower Colorado River is becoming
desert-like, adaptation measures such as desalination plants do not have the water to function. He
contends that addressing water issues should be a NAC recommendation to the charge.

December 9, 2022, NAC/GAC Meeting Summary

15

-------
Other Topics

Mr. Carey moved the discussion to general comments. Dr. Nathan revisited the definition of early
warning systems, explaining that FEMA and other emergency agencies consider them to be systems that
sound alarms to alert about evacuations. He remarked that early warning systems for climate change are
much more ominous, particularly when it comes to health care, diseases and spreading of viruses.
Dr. Nathan proposed adding a health communication component to climate change early warning.

Ms. Chischilly noted that when administrations change after a federal election, the entire system
(i.e., U.S. agenda) changes, which can affect ongoing environmental initiatives. She wondered about
considering approaches at the local level to protect from (or limit the impact of) such changes and
highlighted long-term generational issues regarding changes to education as one example. Members
agreed that systems in place for decades no longer exist and that this is a topic that the NAC could address
in the future.

Mr. Carey informed the members that the Chairs, Vice-Chairs and Mr. Townsend are working to enable
convening the NAC/GAC at EPA headquarters for its first in-person meeting since the COVID-19
pandemic. He thanked the members for their support and adjourned the separate meeting of the NAC.

Summary and Next Steps

Mr. Townsend thanked everyone for their hard work, noting that he looks forward to the reports. He
requested that the NAC/GAC members complete the meeting evaluation that will be circulated shortly
after the meeting ends.

Mr. Carey explained the next steps. The NAC and GAC will compile advice letters for EPA
Administrator Regan, which are due by January 9, 2023. EPA staff will provide opening statements for
the advice letters. Members were requested to send any additional comments for formulating the drafts to
Ms. Brock or Mr. Carey soon after the meeting.

Adjournment

The meeting adjourned at 3:15 p.m. EST.

Action Items

~	Ms. Brock requested that the GAC members provide a list of key subnational actors in Canada,
Mexico and the United States, to be forwarded to the CEC.

~	Ms. Hong will forward a list of CEC accomplishments to the GAC.

~	Ms. Hong will discuss having the EPA Administrator highlight CEC initiatives during his public
appearances with her management.

~	Mr. Cabrera-Rivera will forward to the GAC his concept note relating to charges.

~	Ms. Brock will share contact information for her colleague at DHS with Ms. Hong.

~	Ms. Moore will provide Ms. Brock with a list of climate and green initiatives in Vermont.

~	Ms. Brock will share her draft advice letter on shaping the CEC's development of its climate
adaptation initiative with the GAC members for their comments.

~	Ms. Sagovac will initiate a draft directory in a Google Doc of key subnational actors in Canada,
Mexico and the United States with whom the CEC should be aware and forward it to

Mr. Townsend to circulate to the NAC and GAC members for their input.

~	Dr. D'Anglada will ensure that OITA is made aware of the efforts of CoCoRaHS.

December 9, 2022, NAC/GAC Meeting Summary

16

-------
Dr. Dyjack will check the NEHA network for a list of climate adaptation tools that can be shared
with the NAC.

Mr. Carey will share his draft advice letter on shaping the CEC's development of its climate
adaptation initiative with the NAC members for their comments.

December 9, 2022, NAC/GAC Meeting Summary

17

-------
Summary Certification

I, Marina M. Brock, Chair of the Governmental Advisory Committee, and I, Andrew P. Carey, Chair of
the National Advisory Committee, certify that the meeting minutes for the date ofDecember 9, 2022, as
hereby detailed, contain a record of the persons present and give an accurate description of matters
discussed and conclusions reached and copies of all reports received, issued or approved by the advisory
committees. My signature date complies with the 90-day due date after each meeting required by the GSA
Final Rule.

j h'-t '.f J • >¦*'





Marina M. Brock
Chair, GAC

Andrew P. Carey
Chair, NAC

January 26, 2023

January 26,2023

Date

Date

December 9, 2022, NAC/GAC Meeting Summary

18

-------
Appendix A: Meeting Participants

NAC Members

Andrew P. Carey, Chair

Executive Director

U.S.-Mexico Border Philanthropy Partnership

Ann Marie Chischilly,	Vice-Chair

Executive Director

Institute for Tribal Environmental Professionals
Northern Arizona University

David T. Dyjack, Dr.Ph., CIH

Executive Director and CEO

National Environmental Health Association

Aminata P. Kilungo, Ph.D.

Mel & Enid Zuckerman College of Public
Health

Department of the Health Promotion Sciences
The University of Arizona

Donna L. Lybecker, Ph.D.

Professor and Chair
Department of Political Science
Idaho State University

James Marston

Principal

Marston Sustainability Consulting

Vincent R. Nathan, Ph.D., M.P.H.

Consultant

Center for Houston's Future

Erica Ocampo

Chief Sustainability Officer
The Metals Company

Luis E. Ramirez Thomas

President

Ramirez Advisors Inter-National, LLC

Antonio A. Rene, Ph.D.

Professor

Texas A&M University School of Public Health

Susan Robinson

Senior Director of Sustainability
Waste Management Inc.

Jennifer J. Ronk

Sustainability and Advocacy Manager
The Dow Chemical Company

Sim one Sagovac

Project Director

Southwest Detroit Community Benefits
Coalition

GAC Members

Marina M. Brock, Chair

Senior Environmental Specialist
Barnstable County (Massachusetts) Department
of Health and Environment

Kendra Abkowitz, Ph.D., M.B.A.

Chief Sustainability & Resilience Officer
Office of Mayor John Cooper
Nashville, Tennessee

Leonard Drago

Ombudsman/Tribal Liaison

Arizona Department of Environmental Quality

Sally Ann Gonzales

State Senator
Arizona State Senate

Robert "Bobby" Janecka

Commissioner

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Debra L. Kring

Council Member
City of Mission, Kansas

Julia S. Moore, P.E.

Secretary

Vermont Agency of Natural Resources

December 9, 2022, NAC/GAC Meeting Summary

19

-------
Erich A. Morales

Division Chief

El Paso County Attorney's Office

Austin Nunez

Chairman

San Xavier District Council
Tohono O'odham Nation

June Weintraub, Ph.D.

Senior Epidemiologist

San Francisco Department of Public Health

Kelly C. Wright

Manager

Environmental Waste Management Program
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes

Acting Designated Federal Officer

Clifton Townsend

Federal Advisory Committee Management Division
Office of Resources and Business Operations
Office of Mission Support
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

EPA Participants

Leslie D'Anglada, Ph.D.

Senior Advisor

North America Program

Office of International and Tribal Affairs

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Nadtya Hong, Esq.

General Standing Committee
Commission for Environmental Cooperation
Office of International and Tribal Affairs
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Stephanie McCoy

Federal Advisory Committee Management
Division

Office of Resources and Business Operations

Office of Mission Support

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Gina Moore

Acting Director

Federal Advisory Committee Management
Division

Office of Resources and Business Operations

Office of Mission Support

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Jane Nishida

Assistant Administrator

Office of International and Tribal Affairs

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Joel Scheraga, Ph.D.

Senior Advisor for Climate Adaptation
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Other Participants

Orlando Cabrera-Rivera

Head of Unit

Environmental Quality

Commission for Environmental Cooperation

Secretariat

Marcela Orozco

Head of Advisory Groups and Private Sector

Engagement
Commission for Environmental Cooperation

Louie Porta

Chair

Joint Public Advisory Committee
Commission for Environmental Cooperation

Jorge Daniel Taillant

Executive Director

Commission for Environmental Cooperation
Secretariat

December 9, 2022, NAC/GAC Meeting Summary

20

-------
Contractor Staff

Carolyn J. Fisher, Ph.D.

The Scientific Consulting Group, Inc.

Tamara Korolnek, Ph.D.

The Scientific Consulting Group, Inc.

December 9, 2022, NAC/GAC Meeting Summary

21

-------
Appendix B: Meeting Agenda

NAC

Environment and Trade Working Together

Advisors for a Sustainable Future

Official Meeting of the
National and Governmental Advisory Committees to the
U.S. Representative to the Commission for Environmental Cooperation

AGENDA

Friday, December 9, 2022
12:00 p.m. - 4:00 p.m. EST (11 a.m. Central, 10 a.m. Mountain, 9 a.m. Pacific Time)

Call-in number: TBC

Washington, DC 20460

12:00 p.m. Call to Order and Introductions

Clifton Tow nsend. Designated Federal Officer, EPA

12:05 p.m. Opening Remarks

Gina Moore on behalf of Robbie Young-Mackall, Acting Director, Federal Advisory
Committee Management Division (OMS)

12:10 p.m. Update on U.S. Priorities & Guidance on the Charge

Jane T. Nishida, Assistant Administrator for EPA's Office of International & Tribal
Affairs

12:25 p.m. Welcome and Overview of Agenda

Andy Carey, Chair of the National Advisory Committee
Marina Brock, Chair of the Governmental Adv isory Committee

12:30 p.m. Welcome Back from the CEC

Jorge Daniel Taillant, CEC Executive Director
Louie Porta, JPAC Chair

12:40 p.m. Climate Adaptation Goals at EPA

Joel Scheraga, Senior Advisor for Climate Adaptation

12:55 pm Question and Answer Period
1:00 p.m. Public Comment Period

December 9, 2022, NAC/GAC Meeting Summary

22

-------
1:05 p.m

1:10 p.m

2:10 p.m

3:10 p.m

3:50 p.m

4:00 p.m

BREAK/Committees Meet Separately to Discuss Charge Questions/Hot
Topics Discussion

Andy Carey, Chair of the National Advisory Committee
Marina Brock, Chair of the Governmental Advisory Committee

Question 1: Facilitate a broader, more inclusive and more effective engagement
of key subnational actors in North America (e.g., at the city level, Indigenous
groups, civil society leaders, disadvantaged community representatives, etc.) in
shaping the CEC's development of its climate adaptation initiative

Question 2: Develop a better understanding of the barriers and challenges to
ensuring national and subnational early warning systems provide the right level
of awareness for disaster preparedness and climate adaptation actions; and

Question 3: Stimulate uptake of nature-based climate adaptation actions and
community early warning systems at the subnational level across North
America.

Summary and Next Steps

Andy Carey, Chair of the National Advisory Committee
Marina Brock, Chair of the Governmental Advisory Committee

ADJOURN

December 9, 2022, NAC/GAC Meeting Summary

23

-------
Appendix C: Charge Letter for December 9, 2022, NAC/GAC Meeting

CHARGE QUESTIONS: for NAC/GAC December 9, 2022, MEETING

11/15/2022

Dear NAC/GAC Members,

Below are the charge questions for your meeting on December 9, 2022. We also have included a short
update on new CEC developments since our last meeting on April 28, 2022, with the purpose of
providing context for the charge questions.

I. NAC/GAC BACKGROUND AND CHARGE QUESTIONS

The U.S. seeks advice from the NAC/GAC on how best to engage key subnationgl gctors in North
Americg (e.g., gt the city level, Indigenous groups, civil society legders, disadvantaged community
representgtives, etc.) in shgping the CEC's development of its climgte adaptation initigtive. This
initiative was announced by the Council at the 2022 Council Session in Merida, as a large-scale initiative
(projects with budgets of C$1M and with broader scope) and is included in the CEC's 2022 Operational
Plan.

The CEC has a long history of engaging local actors, including relevant state, tribal and municipal
governments, community leaders and Indigenous groups, in the implementation of CEC projects and
initiatives (e.g., Air Now, food loss and waste, extreme heat, among others). With the increasing
understanding of the importance of including local perspectives in the formulation of policy, programs,
and other actions to effectively address the most pressing environmental issues and the deepening
climate emergency, it is critical that the CEC strengthen its ability to engage and incorporate the views of
key subnational actors, particularly in the area of climate change. This is especially true as many climate
policies and actions that are decided at the international and national levels need to be implemented in
or by subnational jurisdictions (e.g., States, tribal governments, municipalities, etc.) and consider local
conditions.

At the 2022 Council Session, the CEC Council announced funding for the development and
implementation of a C$1M Climate Adaptation Initiative informed by our previous CEC work on
improving the response to extreme events such as floods, drought, extreme heat and forest fires.

Bearing in mind that the CEC is an intergovernmental organization with the unique ability to convene
North American stakeholders across the three countries, create networks, and develop tools, we are
asking the NAC and GAC for advice regarding recommended models or approaches to:

1)	Facilitate a broader, more inclusive and more effective engagement of key subnational actors in
North America (e.g., at the city level, Indigenous groups, civil society leaders, disadvantaged
community representatives, etc.) in shaping the CEC's development of its climate adaptation
initiative;

2)	Develop a better understanding of the barriers and challenges to ensuring national and subnational
early warning systems provide the right level of awareness for disaster preparedness and climate
adaptation actions; and

December 9, 2022, NAC/GAC Meeting Summary

24

-------
3) Stimulate uptake of nature -based climate adaptation actions and community early warning
systems at the subnational level across North America.

II. UPDATE ON CEC DEVELOPMENTS:

At the July 2022 Council Session in Merida, the CEC Council addressed many of the most pressing
environmental challenges facing North America's communities, particularly vulnerable communities and
Indigenous Peoples, and highlighted the role of the CEC in developing a North American Climate
Adaptation Workplan. For example, the CEC is supporting climate resilience and COVID-19 recovery at
the community level through 25 grants valued at more than US$3 million under the Environmental
Justice and Climate Resilience (EJ4Climate) and the North American Partnership for Environmental
Community Action (NAPECA) grant programs.

The 2022 Council Session, with a theme of "Community-led Environmental Education for Sustainable
Development," focused on activities from across North America that support an understanding and
awareness of key environmental concerns, from the perspective of communities directly impacted and
working to develop and share best practices for adapting to a changing climate.

The significance of this theme is timely, as it promotes the development of local and context-specific
strategies as well as an international cooperative approach for managing and responding to
environmental and socio-economic risks across the whole of society. This year's Council Session
addressed several topics supporting the development of community-led projects and initiatives. The
exchange with the Joint Public Advisory Committee, the Traditional Ecological Knowledge Expert Group
(TEKEG) and the CEC Secretariat, led to a constructive discussion of immediate priorities and pressing
needs, including opportunities ranging from specific, innovative, and nature-based solutions to the
improved use of traditional and local knowledge, including the incorporation of Indigenous perspectives.

At the 2022 Session, in addition to the announcement of the large-scale and multi-year initiative totaling
C$1 million to strengthen community resilience to climate change, the Council:

•	Announced an additional US$2 million to launch a new cycle of the EJ4Climate grant program that
will focus on projects supporting environmental education to build resilience to climate change.
The EJ4Climate grant program supports underserved and vulnerable communities, and Indigenous
communities, in Canada, Mexico, and the United States to prepare for climate-related impacts.

•	Announced a C$750,000 initiative to undertake work to support enhanced uptake of circular
economy approaches with sustainable production and consumption patterns in North America.

•	Contributed C$300,000 to support a JPAC-led initiative that will raise awareness in the three
countries to advance sustainable forestry and responsible consumption of wood products.

•	Endorsed a C$300,000 TEKEG-led initiative to address threats to food security by increasing our
understanding of traditional Indigenous practices and knowledge related to food systems.

•	Engaged with the winners of the 2022 CEC Youth Innovation Challenge from Canada, Mexico and
the United States on their innovative and tangible solutions to assist communities in their
recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic.

•	Reviewed the progress made under the ongoing CEC Operational Plan and the projects endorsed
last year.

December 9, 2022, NAC/GAC Meeting Summary

25

-------