#• \ \ d? PRO*^ 2020 National Emissions Inventory Technical Support Document: Waste Disposal - Composting ------- ------- EP A-454/R-23 -001 gg March 2023 2020 National Emissions Inventory Technical Support Document: Waste Disposal - Composting U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Air Quality Assessment Division Research Triangle Park, NC ------- Contents List of Tables i 33 Waste Disposal - Composting 33-1 33.1 Sector Descriptions and Overview 33-1 33.2 EPA-developed emissions 33-1 33.2.1 Activity Data 33-2 33.2.2 Allocation Procedure 33-4 33.2.3 Emissions Factors 33-6 33.2.4 Controls 33-6 33.2.5 Emissions 33-6 33.2.6 Sample Calculations 33-7 33.2.7 Improvements/Changes in the 2020 NEI 33-8 33.2.8 Puerto Rico and U.S. Virgin Islands Emissions Calculations 33-8 33.3 References 33-8 List of Tables Table 33-1: Composting SCCs in the 2020 NEI 33-1 Table 33-2: Annual Waste (million tons) generated and recovered in the US in 2015 33-2 Table 33-3: State-level food waste composting (tons) 33-3 Table 33-4: Ranges and midpoints for data withheld from state and county business patterns 33-5 Table 33-5: 2016 County Business Pattern for NAICS 562212 in Arizona 33-5 Table 33-6: Sample calculations for VOC emissions from greenwaste composting in Apache County, AZ 33-7 l ------- 33 Waste Disposal - Composting There are five sections in this documentation that discuss nonpoint inventory Waste Disposal. This section discusses Composting, the second section (34) discusses Open Burning - Land Clearing Debris, the third section (35) discusses Open Burning - Residential Household Waste, the fourth section (36) discusses Open Burning - Yard Waste, and the fifth section (37) discusses Publicly-Owned Treatment Works (POTWs). The reason these sources are broken up within this EIS sector is because the EPA methodologies for estimating the emissions are different. 33.1 Sector Descriptions and Overview Greenwaste composting includes the diversion of yard waste, food waste, and other biogenic waste from landfills to composting facilities. Estimates of emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOC), ammonia (NH3), and three hazardous air pollutants (HAPs), acetaldehyde; methanol; and naphthalene, from greenwaste composting are based on the amount of food and yard waste composted. Composting of biogenic waste is currently not included in emissions estimates for this category as activity data on this waste type is not available. Note that this source category does not include the composting of biosolids from wastewater treatment plants or manure management facilities. There are separate SCCs for biosolids (2680001000) and for a mixture of greenwaste and biosolids (2680002000). EPA is not currently estimating emissions for these SCCs. If S/L/Ts report any emissions for the mixture SCC, emissions from the greenwaste portion of that mixture may be duplicative of some or all of the EPA emissions estimates described here. Note also that this source category estimates emissions from composting facilities but does not estimate emissions from backyard composting. Table 33-1 shows, for composting, the SCCs covered by the EPA estimates and by the State/Local and Tribal agencies that submitted data. The SCC level 3 and 4 SCC descriptions are also provided. The SCC level 1 and leading level 2 descriptions is "Waste Disposal, Treatment, and Recovery; Composting:" for all SCCs. Table 33-1: Composting SCCs in the 2020 NEI SCC Description EPA S/L/T 2680001000 100% Biosolids (e.g., sewage sludge, manure, mixtures of these matls); All Processes X 2680002000 Mixed Waste (e.g., a 50:50 mixture of biosolids and green wastes); All Processes X 2680003000 100% Green Waste (e.g., residential or municipal yard wastes); All Processes X X A list of agencies that submitted composting emissions is provided in Section 6.2.3. 33.2 EPA-developed emissions The calculations for estimating the emissions from greenwaste composting involve first estimating the amount of food and yard waste composted in each county. The amount of state-level food waste composted is available from the EPA report Food Waste Management in the United States, 2014 [ref 1] The amount of state-level yard waste composted is estimated by calculating the per-capita amount of 33-1 ------- yard waste composted using national data from the EPA report Advancing Sustainable Materials Management: 2015 Fact Sheet [ref 2] and multiplying that by the state population. The state-level yard and food waste are summed together and distributed to the counties based on the proportion of employment at solid waste landfills. The total amount of greenwaste composted is multiplied by emissions factors for VOC and NH3 to estimate emissions of these pollutants from greenwaste composting. 33.2.1 Activity Data The activity data for this source category is the amount of food and yard waste composted, which is estimated using data from two EPA reports: the national-level amount of yard waste composted comes from Advancing Sustainable Materials Management: 2015 Fact Sheet and the state-level amount of food waste composted comes from Food Waste Management in the United States, 2014 [ref 1, ref 2], Table 33-2 shows the total national-level amount of yard waste generated and recovered for composting. Table 33-2: Annual Waste (million tons) generated and recovered in the US in 2015 Material Waste Generated Waste Recovered Yard trimmings 34.72 21.29 The values from Table 33-2 are used with the U.S. population in 2020 of 336 million people [ref 3] to determine per-capita values of food and yard waste recovered for composting. Wyard.US (1) i^yard,US D rUS Where: PCyard,us = Per-capita yard waste recovered for composting in the US, in tons per person per year Wyard,us = Total annual yard waste recovered in the US, in tons/year Pus = US population This calculation results in per-capita values of approximately 0.066 tons per person per year of yard waste recovered for composting. Please note that EPA data on composting does not include backyard composting. The per-capita yard waste values from equation 1 are multiplied by the population of each state to estimate the state-level amount of yard waste recovered for composting. ^Tyard,s P^yard,US ^ (2) Where: Wyard,s = Annual yard waste recovered for composting in state s, in tons PCyard,us= Per-capita yard waste recovered for composting in the US, in tons per person per year 33-2 ------- Ps = Population of state s EPA reports the amount of food waste composted at the state level in the report Food Waste Management in the United States, 2015 [Table 3 in ref 1], These values are shown in Table 33-3. EPA collected these data from state environmental websites and contacts with state agencies. The data year for each state is listed and represents the latest data available. The data were not altered from the original reference for use in this methodology. Table 33-3: State-level food waste composting (tons) State Food Composted Data Year California 715,119 2012 Colorado 29,130 2013 Connecticut 4,644 2013 Delaware 17,626 2013 Florida 158,711 2014 Georgia 8,021 2014 Hawaii 39,287 2014 Indiana 13,525 2013 Iowa 4,334 2010 Kansas 1,127 2010 Maine 1,658 2010 Maryland 69,643 2014 Massachusetts 2,753 2014 Michigan 8,700 2013 Minnesota 46,751 2013 Mississippi 242 2013 Missouri 16,000 2014 State Food Composted Data Year Nevada 35,869 2014 New Hampshire 110 2012 New Jersey 28,634 2012 New York 44,405 2013 North Carolina 38,014 2014 Ohio 81,450 2014 Oregon 50,143 2013 Pennsylvania 56,851 2013 Rhode Island 150 2014 South Carolina 4,277 2014 Tennessee 1,500 2013 Texas 188 2012 Vermont 14,738 2013 Virginia 2,454 2014 Washington 65,221 2013 Wisconsin 8,677 2013 Total 1,569,952 The state-level amount of total greenwaste composted is the sum of the state-level food and yard waste composted. Wqw,s Wyard,s ^food,s (3) Where: WGw,s = Annual total greenwaste recovered for composting in state s, in tons Wyard,s = Annual yard waste recovered for composting in state s, in tons Wfood,s = Annual food waste recovered for composting in state s, in tons, from Table 33-3 The process used to distribute the state-level amount of greenwaste composted to the counties is discussed in next section. 33-3 ------- 33.2.2 Allocation Procedure Comprehensive data on the county locations of composting facilities is not available. As a result, the analysis assumes that greenwaste composting facilities are co-located with solid waste landfills. State-level food greenwaste composting activity (from equation 3) is allocated to the county-level using employment at solid waste landfills (NAICS code 562212). Specifically, state-level estimates of greenwaste collected for composting are multiplied by the ratio of county- to state- level number of employees at landfills. Empc (4) EmpFracc = Emps Where: EmpFracc = The fraction of landfill employees in county c Empc = The number of landfill employees in county c Emps = The number of landfill employees in state s Employment data are from the U.S. Census Bureau's 2016 County Business Patterns (CBP) [ref 4], Due to concerns with releasing confidential business information, the CBP does not release exact numbers for a given NAICS code if the data can be traced to an individual business. Instead, a series of range codes is used. Many counties and some smaller states have only one solid waste landfill, leading to withheld data in the county and/or state business pattern data. To estimate employment in counties and states with withheld data, the following procedure is used for NAICS code 562212. To gap-fill withheld state-level employment data: a. State-level data for states with known employment in NAICS 562212 are summed to the national level. b. The total sum of state-level known employment from step a is subtracted from the national total reported employment for NAICS 562212 in the national-level CBP to determine the employment total for the withheld states. c. Each of the withheld states is assigned the midpoint of the range code reported for that state. Table 33-4 lists the range codes and midpoints. d. The midpoints for the states with withheld data are summed to the national level. e. An adjustment factor is created by dividing the number of withheld employees (calculated in step b of this section) by the sum of the midpoints (step d). f. For the states with withheld employment data, the midpoint of the range for that state (step c) is multiplied by the adjustment factor (step e) to calculate the adjusted state-level employment for landfills. These same steps are then followed to fill in withheld data in the county-level business patterns. g. County-level data for counties with known employment are summed by state. h. County-level known employment is subtracted from the state total reported in state-level CBP (or, if the state-level data are withheld, from the state total estimated using the procedure discussed above). 33-4 ------- i. Each of the withheld counties is assigned the midpoint of the range code (Table 33-4). j. The midpoints for the counties with withheld data are summed to the state level. k. An adjustment factor is created by dividing the number of withheld employees (step h) by the sum of the midpoints (step j). I. For counties with withheld employment data, the midpoints (step i) are multiplied by the adjustment factor (step k) to calculate the adjusted county-level employment for landfills. Table 33-4: Ranges and midpoints for data withheld from state and county business patterns Employment Code Ranges Midpoint A 0-19 10 B 20-99 60 C 100-249 175 E 250-499 375 F 500-999 750 G 1,000-2,499 1,750 H 2,500-4,999 3,750 1 5,000-9,999 7,500 J 10,000-24,999 17,500 K 25,000-49,999 37,500 L 50,000-99,999 75,000 M 100,000+ For example, take the 2016 CBP data for NAICS 562212 (Landfills) in Arizona provided in Table 33-5. Table 33-5: 2016 County Business Pattern for NAICS 562212 in Arizona State FIPS County FIPS County Name NAICS Employment Code Employment 04 001 Apache 562212 B withheld 04 007 Gila 562212 A withheld 04 012 La Paz 562212 A withheld 04 013 Maricopa 562212 296 04 015 Mohave 562212 B withheld 04 017 Navajo 562212 B withheld 04 021 Pinal 562212 40 04 023 Santa Cruz 562212 withheld 04 025 Yavapai 562212 A withheld 04 027 Yuma 562212 B withheld Note: Counties in Arizona that do not have employment in solid waste landfills are excluded from this table. 1. The total number of known county-level employees in Arizona is 336. 2. The state-level CBP reports 522 employees for NAICS 562212 in Arizona. This means there are 186 employees total for the 8 counties for which data are withheld. 33-5 ------- 3. The counties with withheld data are assigned midpoints according to their employment code in Table 33-4. For example, Apache County is given a midpoint of 60 employees (since range code B is 20-99) and Gila County is given a midpoint of 10 employees. 4. The state total of the midpoints for all withheld counties is 270 employees. 5. The adjustment factor is 186/272 = 0.6889. 6. The adjusted employment for Apache County is 60 x 0.6889 = 41. Gila County has an adjusted employment of 10 x 0.6889 = 7 employees. Once county- and state-level employment have been estimated, the ratio of county to state employees (from equation 4) is calculated and multiplied by the state-level greenwaste recovered for composting (from equation 3) to calculate the amount of waste composted in each county. Wgw,c = EmpFracc x WGWtS (5) Where: WGw,c = Annual total greenwaste composted in county c, in tons WGw,s = Annual total greenwaste recovered for composting in state s, in tons EmpFracc = The fraction of landfill employees in county c 33.2.3 Emissions Factors Emissions factors for greenwaste composting (SCC=2680003000) are provided in the "Wagon Wheel Emission Factor Compendium" on the 2020 NEI Supporting Data and Summaries site. The emissions factors for VOC and ammonia (NH3) are taken from the California Air Resources Board Emissions Inventory Methodology for Composting Facilities [ref 5] and are unaltered from the original reference. The emissions factors for the HAPs (acetaldehyde, methanol, and naphthalene) are taken from Kumar et al [ref 6], 33.2.4 Controls There are no controls assumed for this category. 33.2.5 Emissions Emission factors are provided in the "Wagon Wheel Emission Factor Compendium" on the 2020 NEI Supporting Data and Summaries site. For VOC and NH3, the emissions are multiplied by a conversion factor to convert from pounds to tons. 1 ton (6) EP,C = WCWiC x EFp x 2000 Ws Where: Ep,c = Annual emissions of pollutant p in county c, in tons for VOC and NH3 and lbs. for HAPs 33-6 ------- Wgw,c = Annual total greenwaste recovered for composting in state s, in tons EFP = Emissions factor for pollutant p, in tons of pollutant per ton of greenwaste composted Emissions of HAPs are estimated by applying speciation factors (available in the zip file "HAPAugmentation_Nonpoint_28jan2023", on the 2020 NEI Supplemental data FTP site) to annual VOC emissions. For HAPS, no conversion factor is needed, and the emissions are reported in tons. Eh,c = EVOc,c x SFh (?) Where: Eh,c= Annual emissions of HAP h in county c, in tons per year Evoqc = Annual VOC emissions in county c, in tons SFh= Speciation factor for HAP h, in tons of HAP emissions per ton of VOC emissions 33.2.6 Sample Calculations Table 33-6 lists sample calculations to determine the VOC emissions from composting of greenwaste in Apache County, Arizona. Table 33-6: Sample calculations for VOC emissions from greenwaste composting in Apache County, AZ Eq.# Equation Values for Apache County, AZ Result 1 Wyard,us *^yard,US D rUS 21.08 million tons yard waste 329 million people 0.064 tons yard waste per person per year 2 ^Tyard,s P^yard,US ^ 0.064 tons yard waste per person x 7,016,270 people inAZ 449,041 tons yard waste composted in AZ 3 Wqw,s Wyard,s ^food,s 449,041 tons yard waste + 0 tons food waste 443,520 tons green- waste composted in AZ 4 „ EmPc 41 employees in Apache County 0.079 fraction of solid waste employees in Apache County, AZ i-d 11 iUl 1 Emps 522 employees inAZ 5 Wcw.c = EmpFracc x WGWiS 0.079 fraction x 443,520 tons greenwaste composted 35,038 tons greenwaste composted in Apache County, AZ 6 Ep,c ^GW,c ^ EFp 1 ton X 2000 lbs. 35,038tons greenwaste x 4.67 lbs. VOC per ton greenwaste 1 ton X 2000 lbs. 82 tons VOC emissions from greenwaste composting in Apache County, AZ 33-7 ------- 33.2.7 Improvements/Changes in the 2020 NEI There are no significant changes from the methodology used to calculate the 2020 NEI emissions. 33.2.8 Puerto Rico and U.S. Virgin Islands Emissions Calculations Emissions from Puerto Rico are calculated using the same method described above. For the U.S. Virgin Islands, emissions are calculated using 2020 population data [ref 7], since 2014 Census Data does not exist for the U.S. Virgin Islands. 33.3 References 1. U.S. EPA. 2016. Food Waste Management in the United States, 2014. Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery. 2. U.S. EPA. 2018. Advancing Sustainable Materials Management: Facts and Figures Report. 2015 Facts and Figures Sheet, Tablel. Generation, Recovery, and Discards of Products in MSW, 2015. 3. U.S. Census Bureau. 2020 Total Population. American Community Survey. 4. U.S. Census Bureau. 2020 County Business Patterns. 5. California Air Resources Board. 2015. ARB Emissions Inventory Methodology for Composting Facilities. Table A-4. Emission factor data taken from Draft Staff Report on Proposed Amended Rule 1133.1 (chipping and grinding activities) and Proposed Rule 1133.3 (emissions reductions from greenwaste composting operations),Table 111-3. 6. Kumar, A., C.P. Alaimo, R. Horowitz, F.M. Mitloehner, M.J. Kleeman, and P.G. Green. 2011. Volatile organic compound emissions from green waste composting: Characterization and ozone formation. Atmospheric Environment, 45:1841-1848. 7. U.S. Census Bureau. 2020. County Population Totals. 33-8 ------- United States Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Publication No. EPA-454/R-23-001gg Environmental Protection Air Quality Assessment Division March 2023 Agency Research Triangle Park, NC ------- |