Important Factors Influencing
Children's Exposures to Pesticides

Peter P. Egeghy, Nicolle Tulve, Daniel M. Stout il, Lisa Melnyk,

Marsha Morgan, Elaine Cohen Hubal, Roy Fortmann, Linda Sheldon
U.S. EPA Office of Research and Development / National Exposure Research Laboratory

Issue

•	Insufficient data on children's exposures and activities
make it difficult to adequately assess multimedia
exposures to environmental contaminants.

•	As a result, regulators must rely upon a series of
default assumptions and exposure factors when
conducting risk assessments.

•	The National Exposure Research Laboratory (NERD
has supported extensive research with the aim of
replacing assumptions with defensible data to reduce
uncertainties in aggregate exposure estimates.

Approach

•	The Children's Exposure Research Program in NERL has
conducted or supported numerous field and laboratory studies to 1)
identify pesticide use patterns, 2) measure pesticide concentrations in
homes and day care centers, 3) describe spatial and temporal
distributions of residues following applications, and 4) evaluate
existing approaches for estimating dermal and non-dietary exposure.

•	We have assembled the data from these studies and performed
analyses to identify the exposure pathways and activities that strongly
impact children's exposures and to evaluate other factors that
influence exposures. Some highlights are presented in this poster.

Results

• Inhalation exposures are
strongly influenced by the
physicochemical properties of a
compound (Fig. 1). The logged
vapor pressures of several
pesticides of various compound
classes soundly predicted the
mean concentration measured in
indoor air in the CTEPP studies
(r2 = 0.68)

Mean Air Cone, vs Vapor Pressure

loglOVP (mPa)

Figure 1. Vapor pressure is a strong
determinant of airborne concentration.

Figure 2. Estimated
daily intake by route.

• The importance of the
Indirect ingestion route is
greater for pyrethroids,
such as Permethrin, than
for organophosphates,
such as Chlorpyrifos.
Estimated daily intakes
are displayed in boxplots
(Fig. 2) comparing route-
specific distributions and
in piecharts (Fig. 3)
showing percent of total
intake by route.

u m

Chlcqjjrifos	Diazinori

¦ a

| Dietay 1 I Indirect

Figure 3. Estimated percent
of aggregate intake by route.

0 0 o CTEPP-NC HOME WIPE	CTEPP-OH HOME WIPE

Figure 4. Log-probability plot
comparing surface wipe
measurements across studies.

• Seemingly minor modifications of
a measurement technique may
sharply affect results (Fig. 4),
Reduction in the amount of solvent
used with surface wipes from 10 ml
(typical) to 2 ml (CTEPP) produced
results that were about one order of
magnitude lower than those
measured in other field studies
(including the population-based
Child Care Center study).

• The importance of an
exposure route may vary with
exposure level. As estimated
aggregate intake of permethrin
in CTEPP increased (Fig. 5),
the contribution of the indirect
route to total intake also
increased, and the contribution
of the dietary route decreased.
Among the few most highly
exposed individuals, however,
the dietary route was dominant.

LOWEST	HIGHEST

Ranked Aggregate Intake

Figure 5. Route-specific percent
contribution to aggregate intake.

Expected Impact

•	We expect that our analyses will benefit the EPA Program Offices, including the Office of Pesticide Programs and the Office of
Children's Health Protection, in their risk assessment and management activities, allowing them to replace critical default assumptions
with high-quality, real-world data.

•	Fewer default assumptions will produce more accurate exposure and risk assessments, strengthen regulatory actions aimed at
reducing risk, and help ensure that pesticides are appropriately regulated.

epascienceforum

Your Health • Your Environment • Your Future

Although this work was reviewed by EPA and approved for publication, it may not necessarily reflect official Agency policy


-------