EPA

Water Sense

Comments on WaterSense® Notice of
Intent (NOI) to Develop a Draft Specification
for Bath and Shower Diverters

July 7, 2017


-------
WaterSense

Comments on WaterSense®
Notice of Intent (NOI) to Develop a Draft
Specification for Bath and Shower Diverters

Table of Contents

Greg Chick, Ramona's Plumber	2

Tom Burke, Victoria + Albert Baths Ltd	3

Mark Malatesta, LIXIL Water Technology America	5

Marianne Balfe, Marriott International	7

Russ Horner, Water Management Inc	8

David Schwartzkopf, Willoughby Industries, Inc	9

Matt Sigler, Plumbing Manufacturers International	10

Alan Work, Evolve Technologies LLC	13

Cambria McLeod, KohlerCo	14

1	July 7, 2017


-------
EPA

Comments on WaterSense®
Notice of Intent (NOI) to Develop a Draft
Specification for Bath and Shower Diverters

WaterSense

Commenter: Greg Chick
Affiliation: Ramona's Plumber
Comment Date: December 13, 2016

Email Text:

Please excuse my blunt comment, cheap die cast tub spouts corrode and leak. The
publics perception of what a diverter spout has been selling for is likely to curtail a
price/cost increase. And without regular replacement of corroded and thus leaky spouts,
the issue has challenges. Mandating better spouts to be made for new installs is fine, but
those spouts, regardless of a new positive seal need to be made from something better
than die cast pot metal.

I am not in any way connected with the Delta company but they make a durable
relatively cheap diverter spout. 100% seal and I have not seen troubles with them.

Again, I am just a service repair plumber that has seen failure and want to suggest the
best option and the list the failure of poor materials.

Thank you for your indulgence.

Greg Chick, Ca. Lie. 315036, C-36, LEED AP, ARCSA AP, CWA, owner
diyplumbingadvice.com having over 10 million viewers who want to save water & fix
leaks.

2

July 7, 2017


-------
A

Comments on WaterSense®
epa	Notice of Intent (NOI) to Develop a Draft

AA/atCl*ScUSC	Specification for Bath and Shower Diverters

Commenter: Tom Burke
Affiliation: Victoria + Albert Baths Ltd
Comment Date: February 3, 2017

Email Text:

Dear Watersense

Let me begin by advising that we wholly support an improvement to the current ASME
A112.18.1/CSA B125.1 standard in regards to reducing the leak rates

VII. Summary of Information Requests

Scope.

1.	Yes, the definition is acceptable

2.	No, the definitions here are not good enough, a tub-to-shower diverter is not
restricted to only being embedded into the wall

3.	Yes, use the same definitions for marketing to avoid confusion for the consumer

Marking and Product Documentation

1. Current bath and shower diverters are not marked to communicate any

information about a leak rate and this is correct and should remain. If we begin to
mark for leak rates we will end up cohering the products in varying flow rates and
references that a consumer will not be able to understand without a copy of the
standard. Many consumers will not know if a 0.1 gpm leak is acceptable and they
will solely rely on the standards being written to ensure products that are inferior
cannot pass the standards. It can also lead to customers confusing flow rate form
the showerhead to the leak rate at the diverter. To summarise, we do not believe
marking diverters should be a practice.

With the information shown in the research in for the NOI we would support a change to
the ASME A112.18.1/CSA B125.1 standard to reduce the current allowable leak rates
from the diverters.

Thanks Tom

victoria ©albert*

volcanic limestorte baths
Tom Burke, Product Development Manager

Victoria + Albert Baths Ltd, Unit B, Hortonwood 37, Telford, Shropshire, TF1 7XT, UK

3

July 7, 2017


-------
A

Comments on WaterSense®
epa	Notice of Intent (NOI) to Develop a Draft

WatCV SCTISC	Specification for Bath and Shower Diverters

tburke@varidabaths.com

t: +44 (0)1952 221100 m: +44 (0)7825 327976 f: +44 (0)1952
221111 www.vandabaths.com

Please consider the environment: do you really need to print this email?
Confidentiality - This message contains confidential information and is intended only for
the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate,
distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have
received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail
transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be
intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents
of this message or any attached documents or for any damage suffered by your
computer system caused by any errors or viruses contained within this e-mail message
or any attached documents. VAT No. GB 884 2502 16

Celebrating 20 years
of freestanding bathroom design



Find out more at vandabaths.ccm

3

4

July 7, 2017


-------
EPA

Comments on WaterSense®
Notice of Intent (NOI) to Develop a Draft
Specification for Bath and Shower Diverters

WaterSense

Commenter: Mark Malatesta

Affiliation: LIXIL Water Technology America

Comment Date: February 8, 2017	

Email Text:

Lixil Water Technologies America - LWTA (American Standard, DXV and Grohe) has
been a loyal partner with the EPA WaterSense program since its inception. LWTA
values this partnership because the basis of the WaterSense Program is to conserve
water while still providing consumers with high performing products. And LWTA
appreciates the fact that the EPA has always valued LWTA input as a manufacturer.
LWTA appreciates the manner in which the EPA develops their specifications and allows
all stakeholders the opportunity to comment on their proposals. With that in mind I would
like to provide the following comments on behalf of LWTA in advance of the February 8,
2017 webinar.

1.	The NOI introduction clearly identifies the main cause for leaking bath and
shower diverters to be "old leaky diverters" or "products ... used for many years
beyond the typical life cycle". Developing a new specification that can only
address new products does not affect previously installed product. EPA mentions
that this specification will bring attention to this product type which may cause
consumers to change out old bath and shower diverters. Studies on existing
WaterSense certified products, like toilets and showerheads, indicate low
percentages (-20%) of consumer install base have actually converted to
WaterSense certified products. WaterSense specifications for toilets and
showerheads have existed for 10 and 7 years, respectively. If consumers have
not converted to WaterSense certified toilets and showerheads, we find it hard to
believe they will convert their bath and shower diverters.

2.	One of the EPA's main arguments for going to "0-0" rated diverters is that 1,150
models are listed in the CEC database. Unfortunately, the CEC database does
NOT identify if any of the 1,150 diverters are "bath and shower automatic reset
diverters". This is vital information as the proposed WaterSense specification is
referencing the ASME A112.18.1/CSA B125.1-2012 testing requirements. Clause
5.6.1.5.2 requires automatic reset diverters to reset itself to the tub

position. From a design perspective it is extremely difficult to design an automatic
reset diverter to have 0-0 leakage and rest itself to the tub position. The CEC
does require manufacturers to list all types of bath and shower diverters and
some have positive shut-off. The positive shut-off diverter will result in 0-0
leakage rate, but it does NOT automatically reset. Please note that Pull Type,
Push Type, Turn Type, etc. is not an indicator of an automatic reset diverter.

3.	We believe this specification will have a very small effect on water
conservation. This is based on the fact that this specification only affects brand
new product, and most manufacturers design product to meet the CEC
requirements of 0.01 gpm leakage rate.

4.	The 0-0 requirement will force many manufacturers to implement very expensive
design changes, because manufacturers do not want to lose the WaterSense
certification on existing bath & shower trims sets that include WaterSense
certified showerheads. The alternative would be to drop the WaterSense

5

July 7, 2017


-------
EPA

Comments on WaterSense®
Notice of Intent (NOI) to Develop a Draft
Specification for Bath and Shower Diverters

WaterSense

certification on such trims, because the 0-0 requirement cannot be achieved on
the existing automatic reset diverters. The result of this would be many existing
WaterSense certified showerhead models being dropped from listing and the loss
of the annual sales numbers for all of those models.

5. As a manufacturer LWTA values and participates in all of the other applicable
WaterSense specifications, because we see an advantage to marketing those
products with the WaterSense mark. LWTA does not see any value in the
development of a specification for bath and shower diverters. LWTA expects
significant costs to redesign our products and to certify and maintain another
certification files. At the same time LWTA believes that bath and shower diverters
represent a minimal piece of the market. It does not seem logical to focus
significant resources here, that will result in limited impact on water conservation.

Regards,

Mark Malatesta

Sr. Product Compliance Engineer, LIXIL Water Technologies

American Standard Brands

865 Centennial Avenue, Piscataway, NJ 08854

Tel: 732-369-4061 | Mobile: 732-425-1556

E-mail: malatestam@lixilamericas.com

www.americanstandard.com I www.dxv.com

6

July 7, 2017


-------
EPA

Comments on WaterSense®
Notice of Intent (NOI) to Develop a Draft
Specification for Bath and Shower Diverters

WaterSense

Commenter: Marianne Balfe
Affiliation: Marriott International
Comment Date: February 8, 2017

Email Text:

Hello, Veronica,

It is nice to hear from you, thanks for reaching out!

Diverters are certainly a water waste problem for us, particularly when properties install
inexpensive plastic diverters instead of investing in more durable/reliable metal diverters.

I already have another call from 1-2p ET but if I can wrap it up early and join your call, I
will. Otherwise, I will review the NOI and respond back through your system.

I look forward to catching up one of these days. Next time I have extra time on a HQ
(MD) trip, I'll reach out!

Best regards,

Marianne Balfe | Director of Energy and Environmental Sustainability | The Americas
Marriott International | phone 415-377-1362

Marianne

7

July 7, 2017


-------
EPA

Comments on WaterSense®
Notice of Intent (NOI) to Develop a Draft
Specification for Bath and Shower Diverters

WaterSense

Commenter: Russ Horner
Affiliation: Water Management Inc.
Comment Date: February 8, 2017

Email Text:

Veronica -

Great to hear from you. I will be out today, but Tom will be able to join the
call. Interesting topic-we run across problems with diverters all the time. The problem
seems to be getting a little bigger now that more back pressure is created as a result of
lower flow showerheads.

Thanks again for reaching out. I hope we can talk or see each other soon.

Best Regards,

Russ Horner

WATER

MANAGEMENT INC.

W: 703-370-9070 x113
Cell: 703-989-0089

8

July 7, 2017


-------
EPA

Comments on WaterSense®
Notice of Intent (NOI) to Develop a Draft
Specification for Bath and Shower Diverters

WaterSense

Commenter: David Schwartzkopf
Affiliation: Willoughby Industries, Inc.
Comment Date: February 8, 2017

Email Text:

Thanks for the informative webinar and fielding my questions and concerns today as you
did. I am open to review further if it is useful.

I also wanted to let you know that I have transitioned into a semi-retired mode where I
am only in the office two days a week (typically Tuesdays and Wednesdays), so I may
not be in the office if you call. However, my schedule is fairly flexible, so feel free to
reach me at other contact points where I am more frequently available and responsive:

Cell Phone: 317-416-8210

Email: david@schwartzkopf.org (cc'd on this email)

Also, I will be in the DC area visiting grandkids in Vienna, VA, toward the end of the
week. I do not know if you are open to face-to-face meetings and giving tours of your
facility while my grandkids are at school; but I'd be open for that. If that is not possible or
feasible, the phone and email channels are fine.

David Schwartzkopf

Engineering Assistant
Willoughby Industries, Inc.

5105 W. 78th Street
Indianapolis, IN 46268
Phone 317-875-0830

WILLOUGH6Y

"Willoughby Industries' products are made in the USA
http://www.willouqhbv-ind.com

9

July 7, 2017


-------
EPA

Comments on WaterSense®
Notice of Intent (NOI) to Develop a Draft
Specification for Bath and Shower Diverters

WaterSense

Commenter: Matt Sigler

Affiliation: Plumbing Manufacturers International

Comment Date: February 17, 2017	

Email Text:

EPA Staff -

Please accept PMI's comment letter in regards to the EPA WaterSense NOI to develop
a draft specification for bath and shower diverters. If you have any questions, please
feel free to contact me at your convenience.

Regards,

Matt Sigler

Plumbing Manufacturers International

Technical Director

847-217-7212

Email: msiqler@safeplumbinq.org
www.safeplumbinq.org

Safe, responsible plumbing. Always.

Mission Statement

Follow, like and share SafePlumbing messages on Twitter. Facebook and Google+. On
Linkedln, follow, like and share SafePlumbing and PMI.

Email Attachment. Letter to EPA - Draft Specification for Bath and Shower
Diverters FINAL.pdf

February 17, 2017

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Water - WaterSense Program
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20460
wate rse n se- p rod u cts@e rg. co m

RE: EPA WATERSENSE® DRAFT SPECIFICATION FOR BATH AND SHOWER
DIVERTERS

Dear EPA Office of Water:

Plumbing Manufacturers International (PMI) appreciates this opportunity to provide
comments to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regarding the
WaterSense® Draft Specification for Bath and Shower Diverters. PMI is the international,
U.S.-based trade association representing 90% of U. S. plumbing products sold in the

10

July 7, 2017


-------
EPA

Comments on WaterSense®
Notice of Intent (NOI) to Develop a Draft
Specification for Bath and Shower Diverters

WaterSense

United States. We have made the promotion of water safety and efficiency a top priority
and have included this in our mission statement1. PMI's members are industry leaders in
producing safe, reliable and innovative water efficient plumbing technologies and have
supported the WaterSense® program since its inception. In addition, PMI and our
member companies are longstanding partners in EPA's WaterSense® program.

In regards to EPA's notice of intent (NOI) to develop a draft specification for bath and
shower diverters, PMI and our members oppose the draft specification for the following

•	Since the EPA WaterSense® program has matured to include a wide variety of water
efficient products, EPA and industry should now focus on accelerating the
replacement of older installed products versus developing a new specification that
will result in little to no savings and not address the root cause of tub spout leakage,
as detailed below. Based on the July 2015 study, titled "U.S. Market Penetration of
WaterSense® Shower Heads, Lavatory Faucets and Toilets," the market penetration
rates of WaterSense® products throughout the United States are fairly low.
According to the study, the following percentages of U.S. homes have WaterSense®
products installed2:

o Lavatory faucets = 25.4%
o Showerheads = 28.7%
o Water closets = 7.0%

•	The proposed "0-0" pre- and post-life cycle requirement is a potential safety hazard
as there must be a slight amount of leakage out of a tub spout in order for the
diverterto automatically reset. Otherwise, the diverterwill remain activated, resulting
in a possibly dangerous thermal shock situation as the shower is activated by the
next bather.

•	The draft specification does not account for the natural water quality variation effects
on long-term diverter performance, such as calcium build-up due to hard water
conditions. These conditions, which require regular attention by the homeowner, are
the root cause as to why diverters leak over time, not current manufacturing
practices.

•	EPA has identified in the NOI that the volume of wasted water per household per
year, based on the California Energy Commission's (CEC) Appliance Efficiency
Regulations, is 53 gallons pre-life cycle and 264 gallons post-life cycle. It should be
noted that most manufacturers comply with the requirements of the CEC since they
sell diverters in California and don't generally carry different stock keeping units
(SKUs) of diverters based on U.S. regions. Therefore, the difference in water saved
per CEC regulations and the proposed values in the draft specification equate to a

1	PMI's Mission: To promote the water efficiency, health, safety, quality and environmental
sustainability of plumbing products while maximizing consumer choice and value in a fair and
open marketplace. To provide a forum for the exchange of information and industry education. To
represent openly the members' interests and advocate for sound environmental and public health
policies in the regulatory/legislative processes. To enhance the plumbing industry's growth and
expansion.

2	US Market Penetration of WaterSense Shower Heads, Lavatory Faucets and Toilets, GMP
Research Industry Report commissioned by PMI, July 2015, pg. 5.

reasons:

11

July 7, 2017


-------
EPA

Comments on WaterSense®
Notice of Intent (NOI) to Develop a Draft
Specification for Bath and Shower Diverters

WaterSense

yearly savings of only 21 cents to $1.06 per household based on an average cost of
$0,004 per gallon of tap water3.

• The EPA is considering requiring both bath/shower trim and bath/shower diverters to
be individually third-party certified in order for combination models to bear the
WaterSense® label. PMI is greatly concerned about this requirement for the following
reasons:

o Manufacturers now will be required to third-party certify not only the diverter
itself but also, separately, the associated trim that comes with the diverter.
The current WaterSense® Specification for Showerheads already requires
showerheads and the associated trim that comes with the showerhead, which
may include a diverter, to be certified. This proposed requirement is overly
burdensome to manufacturers, and would have a negative impact on the
number of products that manufacturers choose to have WaterSense®
certified. This is because manufacturers will be required to have the same
tub/shower models listed in two WaterSense® files, thereby doubling
certification costs. Furthermore, when annual audit samples are collected,
both manufacturers and certification agencies will have to ensure that
duplicate testing is not done which is costly and burdensome,
o The proposed "0-0" diverter performance requirement would needlessly
require delisting of many current WaterSense® combination models even
though the diverters already meet the stringent CEC standards. More than
half the diverter models (54%) in the MAEDBS database do not meet this
slight efficiency increase, yet they already provide significant water savings.
This "all or none" approach would have a negative impact on the number of
products that manufacturers choose to have WaterSense® certified.

In summary, PMI continues to support the WaterSense® voluntary efficiency program.
However, we do not support the draft specification for the reasons outlined above. PMI
believes EPA and industry should concentrate on encouraging the installation of existing
WaterSense® products rather than on developing a new specification that will result in
minimal water savings, while possibly risking public safety.

Sincerely,

Matt Sigler
Technical Director

Plumbing Manufacturers International
Office 847-217-7212
msiqler@safeplumbinq.org

cc: PMI Board of Directors

3 "You Are Paying 300 Times More for Bottled Water than Tap Water", Business Insider, July 12,
2013,

http://www.slate.com/bloas/business insider/2013/07/12/cost of bottled water vs tap water th
e difference will shock vou.html

12

July 7, 2017


-------
EPA

Comments on WaterSense®
Notice of Intent (NOI) to Develop a Draft
Specification for Bath and Shower Diverters

WaterSense

Commenter: Alan Work
Affiliation: Evolve Technologies LLC
Comment Date: March 24, 2017

Email Text:

Tessa,

Thank you for the spreadsheet. I think one of the biggest challenges with addressing tub
spouts is going to be convincing people that there is a problem. In my experience,
diverter leaks are so ubiquitous that people don't even realize they are generating waste
or that they don't have to leak.

If Evolve can assist in any way please let me know. We're obviously very interested in
the work you're doing, and I very much appreciate you sharing this data with me. If there
are other opportunities to speak or participate in future workshops, etc., please keep us
in mind. My contact information is below.

Alan

enjoy more, use less.

Alan Work

Director of Business Development I Evolve Technologies LLC

President, SW Chapter I AESP

480.215.3061 I alan.work@thinkevolve.com

15354 N 83rd Way I Scottsdale, AZ I 85260

www.thinkevolve.com

We've updated our company name, URL and email addresses to more accurately reflect
who we are. Please update your records.

13

July 7, 2017


-------
EPA

Comments on WaterSense®
Notice of Intent (NOI) to Develop a Draft
Specification for Bath and Shower Diverters

WaterSense

Commenter: Cambria McLeod
Affiliation: KohlerCo.
Comment Date: June 29, 2017

Email Text:

Dear EPA,

Kohler Co. is submitting the attached comment letter in response to the NOI Draft
Specification for Bath and Shower Diverters. We appreciate you taking our comments
into consideration.

Regards,

Cambria McLeod

Staff Engineer- Codes & Standards
KOHLER COMPANY
949.278.9121

Email Attachment. Kohler Comments re EPA NOI Draft Specification for Bath and
Shower Diverters.pdf

June 29, 2017

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Water - WaterSense Program
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20460
wate rse n se- p rod u cts@e rq. co m

RE: WaterSense® Notice of Intent (NOI) to Develop a Draft Specification for Bath and
Shower Diverters

Dear EPA Office of Water,

Kohler Co. deeply values sustainable water use in our operations, the home and the
community. As long standing partner with EPA's Water Sense Program, a nine-time
Water Sense award winner and as the leading U.S. brand in plumbing fixtures for
residential and commercial applications, Kohler Co. has helped consumers use less
water without sacrificing the performance they expect in their kitchens and bathrooms.
We believe in responsible conservation of resources while keeping human health and
safety a top priority for this and future generations, believe.kohler.com Kohler therefore
appreciates the opportunity to provide the below comments regarding the EPA's NOI
Draft Specification for Bath and Shower Diverters.

1. Human Health and Safety

The Draft Specification for Bath and Shower Diverters is intended to "reduce or eliminate
water wasted through shower events." However, a zero leakage requirement has the
potential to create a hazardous, thermal shock situation for the user.

14

July 7, 2017


-------
EPA

Comments on WaterSense®
Notice of Intent (NOI) to Develop a Draft
Specification for Bath and Shower Diverters

WaterSense

•	If the tub spout diverter leakage requirements are lowered to zero, there will be no
relief of operating pressure which means the column of water behind the diverter will
have no way to escape. This could create a hydraulically locked situation and
automatic reset diverters will be difficult to undivert. In this state, the diverter would
not be able to reset itself to tub mode which is a condition in ASME A112.18.1,
section 5.6.1.5.2. All U.S. plumbing codes require the product be compliant with
ASME A112.18.1. If the diverter remains activated, there is potential for thermal
shock to the next user as the configuration will have the showerhead turned on first
instead of the tub spout.

•	A hydraulically locked situation is also likely to cause accelerated wear on the
sealing member resulting in earlier leaking of the seal. Therefore regardless of the
testing requirements, water would be wasted in the field, negating any theoretical
savings.

•	Furthermore, based on the nature of plumbing systems and components, there is
often residual water within the system and its components. This residual water needs
to drain and the amount of water will not be reduced by changing the requirements of
the tub spout diverter itself.

2. Water Savings

The NOI states that the intent of the specification would be to "improve the water
efficiency of bath and shower diverters." Because the actual the performance of products
is highly dependent on both water quality and the consumer's actions, we believe that
going to a zero leakage rate will not provide the anticipated water savings. Water quality
and low replacement rates are the root causes of in-field tub spout diverter leaks.
Changing manufacturers' testing requirements will not affect the root causes.

•	The in-field leak rate the NOI used to "illustrate the magnitude of water wasted by
leaking bath and shower diverters" is extracted from statistically insignificant studies
which were not substantial enough to represent the Nation. The studies referenced in
the NOI represented only four small areas of the United States. Water quality varies
greatly in and across regions and because poor water quality can have a negative
impact on product performance, the assumption that these regions are
representative of the entire U.S. cannot be upheld unless water quality reports were
also analyzed or additional studies with various water sources are included in the
EPA's substantiation.

The 0.29 gpm average leakage rate which the EPA has determined to be
representative of the data from these studies is not complete. The Taitem study did
not provide field data on diverters that leaked 0.1 gpm or less and only provided data
on those that leaked more than 0.1 gpm. Because the overall mean is unknown, it
would be irresponsible to assume an overall average from this study. The Fort
Carson study was not available publicly and only the resulting data was provided in
EPA's comments. Therefore, it should not be concluded that there is an average
0.29 gpm leakage rate, which is what the EPA has used to make the claim of annual
"water wasted for a utility serving 200,000 homes amounts to nearly 309 million

15

July 7, 2017


-------
EPA

Comments on WaterSense®
Notice of Intent (NOI) to Develop a Draft
Specification for Bath and Shower Diverters

WaterSense

gallons." Also, the test method, installation, water quality, and other important
parameters such as tub spout age were unknown in some of these studies. If a tub
spout diverter that exceeded its useful life was included in these studies, or if the
water quality was poor and therefore decreased the useful life of the product, it could
skew the savings calculations.

We appreciate that EPA has recognized this in the NOI, stating "overtime, the
magnitude of these diverter leaks can increase, sometimes substantially, resulting in
significant water waste passed down the drain with every shower." As indicated
earlier, water quality and low replacement rates are the root causes of in-field tub
spout diverter leaks. Changing the manufacturers' testing requirements will have no
effect on the root causes.

•	The California Energy Commission (CEC) has implemented leakage rates that are
stricter than the ASME requirements. According to Plumbing Manufacturers
International, the majority of plumbing manufacturers do not keep a separate stock of
CEC compliant product but have converted products across their U.S. portfolio to
comply with CEC. Kohler Co. is one of these manufacturers and agrees with this
statement. Therefore, the projected water savings should not assume the ASME leak
rate as the baseline since any tub spout diverter in the U.S. is highly likely to be
replaced with a CEC compliant product. Note that even if an outdated product is
replaced, the new product's field performance is directly related to water quality.

•	Most importantly, we have found that the replacement rate of tub spout diverters as a
singular product sku is an insignificant fraction of sales compared to that of a
combination product which would contain a valve, showerhead or trim for example.
This leads us to believe that the typical replacement rate of tub spout diverters is in
line with a remodel. Therefore, even if a product meets the ASME requirements, the
CEC requirements or meets a zero leakage requirement, if a consumer is using the
product with poor quality water, it may leak and if so, we believe that consumers still
will not replace it unless they are completing a full remodel. Furthermore, we have
seen a significant increase in replacement of tub/shower combinations with shower-
only installations which further reduces the potential water savings calculations for
tub spout diverters as it is not a one-to-one replacement rate.

3. Consumer Impact

The NOI claims that this specification "can help heighten consumer and utility awareness
about the potential to decrease water waste and increase water efficiency associated
with bath and shower diverters." We disagree that this specification will have a positive
impact in the market as we have not seen any evidence that a Water Sense tub spout
diverter specification would increase awareness to the point that there would be an
upsurge in tub spout diverter replacement in the field.

•	In addition to the sales data previously mentioned, the market saturation of Water
Sense toilets is an indication that replacement rate of tub spout diverters would not
be influenced by this specification. According to the 2015 GMP Research study, "US

16

July 7, 2017


-------
EPA

Comments on WaterSense®
Notice of Intent (NOI) to Develop a Draft
Specification for Bath and Shower Diverters

WaterSense

Market Penetration of WaterSense Shower Heads, Lavatory Faucets and Toilets,"4
only 7% of toilets installed in the U.S. are Water Sense toilets. Even with legislation
requiring high efficiency and/or Water Sense toilets in new installations, product
sales, and real estate transactions and even with programs to monetarily incentivize
consumers, there are still millions of outdated products installed. If water closets,
which are more visible to the consumer in terms of aesthetics, number of uses per
day, water consumption and sanitary importance, are not being replaced, there is no
basis to assume that a tub spout diverter would be replaced.

• We believe that this specification may have an adverse effect on water savings and
the Water Sense program by inadvertently reducing the number of Water Sense
labeled showerheads on the market. Many showerheads are packaged together in
combination with a tub spout diverter and if the Water Sense specification requires
that both the tub spout diverter and the showerhead meet their respective
specifications, it could mean removal of the label from a Water Sense qualified
showerhead. Kohler Co. has a significant amount of product skus that contain both a
showerhead and a tub spout diverter. We have worked diligently to reengineer
showerheads to comply with the EPA's Water Sense Specification for Showerheads.
If a combination sku contains a 2.0gpm Water Sense labeled showerhead and a tub
spout diverter with 0.01 gpm leakage, we would have to remove the Water Sense
label. This tradeoff undermines the NOI's intent to increase consumer awareness.
Furthermore, the added cost of the additional listing is an economic burden for the
manufacturers. Manufacturers may choose to opt out, reducing the awareness of the
program, or may choose to pass the cost burden to the consumer, reducing the
incentive for product replacement even further.

As a long term partner of the EPA Water Sense program, Kohler Co. supports
meaningful change that can truly make an impact. Unfortunately, the Draft Specification
for Bath and Shower Diverters does not promote this type of change. The result of our
findings is that the assumed water savings is inaccurately overestimated and the
negative impacts regarding safety, economic burden and potential reduction of Water
Sense labeled products far outweigh any benefits. We will continue to champion the role
of smart and sustainable design because this vision aligns with our legacy, our values
and our business and we look forward to continuing our partnership with the EPA.

Sincerely,

Cambria McLeod

Staff Engineer - Codes and Standards
Kohler Co.

cambria.mcleod@kohler.com

4 "US Market Penetration of WaterSense Shower Heads, Lavatory Faucets and Toilets," July
2015:

https://www.safeplumbing.org/files/safeplumbing.org/documents/press_release_downloads/9-15-
15-WaterSense-market-penetration-study.pdf

17

July 7, 2017


-------