MEETING SUMMARY
of the

PUBLIC COMMENT PERIODS
of the

NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ADVISORY COUNCIL

May 23 and 24, 2000
ATLANTA, GEORGIA

Meeting Summary Accepted By:

Charles Lee	Haywood Turrentine

Office of Environmental Justice	Chair

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Designated Federal Official


-------
CHAPTER TWO
SUMMARY OF THE
PUBLIC COMMENT PERIODS

1.0 INTRODUCTION

During its meeting in Atlanta, Georgia, the Executive
Council of the National Environmental Justice
Advisory Council (NEJAC) held two public comment
periods, the first on Tuesday evening, May 23, 2000
and the second on the evening of Wednesday, May
24, 2000. During the two sessions, 61 individuals
offered comments.

This chapter presents summaries of the testimony
the Executive Council of the NEJAC received during
the public comment periods and the comments and
questions that the testimony prompted on the part of
the members of the Executive Council. Section 2.0,
General Public Comment Period Held on May 23,
2000, summarizes the presentations on general
environmental justice issues offered on that date,
along with the dialogue those presentations
prompted. Section 3.0, Focused Public Comment
Period Held on May 24, 2000, summarizes the
testimony offered related to community
environmental health and environmental justice
issues during the public comment period held on that
date and the dialogues between the presenters and
the members of the Council that followed those
presentations.

Opening the fifteenth meeting of the NEJAC, Mr.
Haywood Turrentine, Executive Director, Laborers
Education and T raining T rust Fund (an affiliate of the
Laborers International Union of North America) and
chair of the Executive Council of the NEJAC,
thanked the members of the council and the public
who had traveled considerable distances to attend
the meeting. Mr. Turrentine requested that
commenters adhere to the specified guidelines to
ensure that everybody on the schedule would have
an opportunity to speak. He also asked that
members of the Executive Council to focus on
expressing questions and observations in response
to the issues presented. Mr. Turrentine added that
members of the council would be welcome to ask
questions intended to clarify a comment offered.

2.0 GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD
HELD ON MAY 23, 2000

This section summarizes the comments presented
to the Executive Council during the general public
comment period held on May 23, 2000, along with

the questions and observations those comments
prompted among members of the Executive Council.

Comments are summarized below in the order in
which they were offered.

2.1 Elizabeth Crowe, Chemical Weapons
Working Group, Berea, Kentucky

Ms. Elizabeth Crowe, Chemical Weapons Working
Group (CWWG), Berea, Kentucky, stated that her
organization is a national coalition that works to
ensure the safe disposal of chemical weapons in the
continental United States and U.S. territories located
in the Pacific. Ms. Crowe noted that she had spoken
at the previous meeting of the NEJAC, held in
Arlington, Virginia in December 1999. At that time,
she said, she had discussed environmental
injustices within the U.S. Department of Defense's
(DoD) chemical weapons disposal program and
chronic problems associated with the U.S.
Department of the Army's (Army) chemical weapons
incinerators in the Pacific and in Utah. The Army
has illogically insisted on constructing additional
incinerators in minority communities located in
Oregon, Alabama, and Arkansas, continued Ms.
Crowe, despite the availability of safer, more
acceptable non-incineration disposal technologies.

Ms. Crowe stated that, since the December meeting
of the NEJAC, Mr. Gary Harris, a former employee
of the Utah incinerator, had alleged that, to maintain
the Army's operating permits, the Army and its
contractor intentionally falsified information
submitted to the state of Utah. Those allegations
corroborate handwritten statements and
memorandums released to the CWWG by Mr. Steve
Jones, safety manager at the Utah incinerator, she
stated.

On Monday, May 8, 2000, she continued, when
chemical agents were released from the incinerator
smokestack, the Army waited four hours before
notifying county officials. The public was not notified
until Wednesday, May 10, she added. Further, she
pointed out, requests for basic information about the
incident made by citizens during a public meeting
were ignored.

Ms. Crowe stated that the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) is poised to grant the Army
a permit to burn shipping tubes laden with

Atlanta, Georgia, May 23 and 24, 2000

2-1


-------
Public Comment Periods

National Environmental Justice Advisory Council

polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) in the incinerators.
The permit is applicable to any chemical weapons
incinerator, including the one in Anniston, Alabama,
she said, but a public hearing was held only in Utah.
Ms. Crowe pointed out that minority communities
should not be subjected to the risks that incinerators
capable of releasing live chemical agents pose when
safer non-incineration technologies have passed
demonstration tests successfully.

Ms. Crowe then expressed her belief that the
existing subcommittees of the NEJAC are not well
equipped to handle issues related to Federal
facilities. She requested support from the NEJAC in
"pulling" permits for chemical weapons incinerators
in favor of safer, non-incineration technologies.

Mr. Tom Goldtooth, Indigenous Environmental
Network and chair of the Indigenous Peoples
Subcommittee of the NEJAC, stated that he was
aware of several of the facilities Ms. Crowe referred
to. Mr. Goldtooth noted that the incinerator at
Umatilla Army Depot, Utah, burns toxic materials.
That issue already had been identified as an
environmental justice one, he said. He asked Ms.
Crowe to verify whether the Umatilla Tribe has
opposed the facility since its initial siting. Ms. Crowe
verified that the tribe had expressed a number of
concerns about the site, adding that over the
preceding few months, several problems had arisen
at the site. Ms. Crowe stated that 63 percent of the
stockpiled chemical weapons in Oregon are identical
to those stored in Maryland, where they currently
have a pilot plan under construction for
neutralization. A number of people in that affected
community, including members of nearby tribes,
favor that neutralization technology for use in
Oregon, she added. Mr. Goldtooth also asked Ms.
Crowe whether the Utah facility still was in operation.
Ms. Crowe said that the incinerator had been shut
down, on May 8, until the cause of the release of the
chemical agents could be determined.

Ms. Annabelle Jaramillo, Oregon Office of the
Governor and Vice Chair of the Air and Water
Subcommittee of the NEJAC, asked Ms. Crowe what
types of chemicals are involved in causing the
problems. Ms. Crowe said that the types of
chemicals involved are lethal chemical agents, nerve
agents, and mustard agents.

2.2 James Friloux, Louisiana Department of
Environmental Quality, Baton Rouge,
Louisiana

Mr. James Friloux, Louisiana Department of
Environmental Quality (LDEQ), Baton Rouge,
Louisiana, reminded the members ofthe NEJAC that

they had toured the community of Norco, Louisiana
during the meeting held by the NEJAC in Baton
Rouge, Louisiana in December 1998. During that
week, he continued, several industrial companies
had alerted the community to a possible chemical
release. Citizens of Norco attended the meeting of
the NEJAC and, during one ofthe public comment
sessions, expressed their concerns about living next
to the Norco industrial complex, he continued.
Following that meeting, Mr. Friloux said, he had
formed a panel consisting of 30 members of the
community and representatives of five industries.
Topics discussed by the panel have included
emergency response, evacuation routes, health
issues, and job training, stated Mr. Friloux. Mr
Friloux expressed his view that the meetings had
been very productive to date and that the formation
ofthe panel has fostered an open dialogue between
the citizens of the community and their industrial
neighbors.

Ms. Rosa Hilda Ramos, Community of Catano
Against Pollution and member of the Air and Water
Subcommittee ofthe NEJAC, asked Mr. Friloux what
efforts the state had made to engage affected
communities early in the Title V permitting process
under the Clean Air Act (CAA). Mr. Friloux
responded that information is shared primarily
through a public hearing process. Ms. Ramos added
that the Title V process is a very complicated one
that citizens find difficult to comprehend and that it is
necessary that the state share information to
educate communities about the permits. Ms. Ramos
then asked whether the state would be willing to
extend the comment periods for some ofthe Title V
permits that have passed without community
participation. Mr. Friloux stated that the state had
extended comment periods several times at the
request of citizens.

2.3 Farella Esta Robinson, United States
Commission on Civil Rights, Kansas City,
Kansas

Ms. Farella Esta Robinson, United States
Commission on Civil Rights, Kansas City, Kansas,
stated that her organization had been examining
environmental justice issues in Louisiana since the
early 1990s. The commission, she said, currently is
responsible for conducting fact-finding studies and
hearings on civil rights developments and issues
across the country. In 1993, the U.S. Commission
on Civil Rights released a report, The Battle for
Environmental Justice in Louisiana ... Government,
Industry, and the People, which examined
environmental concerns in Louisiana. The
commission, she continued, currently is conducting
a follow-up study because the problems in Louisiana

2-2

Atlanta, Georgia, May 23 and 24, 2000


-------
National Environmental Justice Advisory Council

Public Comment Periods

continue to exist. One of the recommendations
made in the report was that EPA, state, and local
officials consider Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of
1964 (Title VI) as an element of environmental
justice and prohibit discrimination based on race.
She invited the members of the NEJAC to a public
hearing to assess successes and problems that
continue following efforts made to implement the
recommendations set forth in the commission's 1993
report.

2.4 Jerome Baiter, Public Interest Law Center of
Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Stating that he is an attorney who performs
environmental work, Mr. Jerome Baiter, Public
Interest Law Center of Philadelphia, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania, noted that all his clients are
community groups formed by minority populations
who are experiencing problems with existing
polluting facilities or proposed facilities. Mr. Baiter
explained that, since EPA releases its Title VI Interim
Guidance for Investigating Administrative Complaints
Which Challenge Permitting Decisions, he has been
addressing issues related to Title VI. In his opinion,
he continued, EPA's interim guidance does not
address the disparities in health conditions that exist
in this country. The guidance does not seek any
information about the health of the community in
which the siting of a facility has been proposed, he
added. In response to that lack of information, the
Law Center of Philadelphia developed an alternative
guidance system, or an environmental justice
protocol, he explained. The protocol is based on the
philosophical concept that, if a community already
has a disparately poor health record, it should not be
made to endure the presence of another polluting
facility.

Mr. Baiter explained that the law center examines
the health of a community on a comparative basis.
All data used for comparative analysis are extracted
from official state health data, he noted. While a
community may not be familiar with the intricacies of
the toxic chemicals, its members are familiar with
their health, he explained. Mr. Baiter stated that a
system based on health should be implemented to
replace EPA's proposed impact analysis and
cumulative impact analysis, which do not address
the protection of communities.

Dr. Marinelle Payton, School of Public Health,
Harvard University Medical School and chair of the
Health and Research Subcommittee of the NEJAC,
observed that the Health and Research
Subcommittee would like to consider the issue
raised by Mr. Baiter. Ms. Ramos then suggested
that Mr. Baiter engage in the process of commenting

on EPA regional environmental justice policies.
Each EPA region must develop an environmental
justice policy, she explained, suggesting that Mr.
Baiter work with the region to incorporate the
concepts he had described into that policy.

2.5 Doris Bradshaw, Defense Depot Memphis,
Tennessee, Concerned Citizens Committee,
Memphis, Tennessee

Observing that a complaint system for Federal
facilities is needed, Ms. Doris Bradshaw, Defense
Depot Memphis, Tennessee, Concerned Citizens
Committee, Memphis, Tennessee, stated that
emergency response and preparedness are not
addressed when removals of chemical weapons are
carried out in her community. The community, which
consists primarily of older people, is adjacent to a
60-acre landfill called Dunn Field from which the
U.S. Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) is removing
chemical test kits that contain mustard and nerve
gases. DLA selected the emergency preparedness
plan for the community, which is to "stay in place" in
a worst-case scenario, she explained. The plan is
not adequate, she continued, because the people
live on a dead-end street with a 40 foot wall located
at the end of the street making it impossible for
those people to be rescued by air lift in this "stay in
place" scenario. Further, she explained that DLA
chose the middle of June to remove the chemical
test kits; at a time when the weather is hot and
humid. This "stay in place" scenario requires that
residences stop using air conditioning, "stuff towels
under doors, and hang plastic sheets over windows
to avoid contact with the air, Ms. Bradshaw stated.
She expressed fear that such procedures would
cause high incidents of heat related deaths.
According to Ms. Bradshaw, the more the members
of the community approach DLA, the more retaliation
the community is subjected to. EPA also had been
unresponsive, she added.

Ms. Bradshaw requested that EPA and the NEJAC
implement a complaint system for Federal facilities
so community voices can be heard. Mr. Turrentine
acknowledged Ms. Bradshaw's recommendation and
noted that the issue would be addressed by the
subcommittees during the week. Mr. Turrentine
stated that more research on the Federal facilities
issue would be needed before it could be determined
which direction the NEJAC should take, but added
that the subcommittees would meet with
representatives of the Memphis community to
determine how they can act on the issues Ms.
Bradshaw had raised. Ms. Ramos then asked what
role the local emergency planning committee had
played in Ms. Bradshaw's community, noting that
complaints can be filed with that body. Ms.

Atlanta, Georgia, May23 and 24, 2000

2-3


-------
Public Comment Periods

National Environmental Justice Advisory Council

Bradshaw responded that the local emergency
response committee had informed DLA that the
team was not prepared to deal with a chemical
weapons emergency. Ms. Bradshaw told the
members of the council that she would give them a
letter explaining the situation that had been
submitted to the highest-level official of DLA. Ms.
Ramos noted that the law requires that a local
emergency planning committee be maintained that
includes a representative of the community and that
it is important that the council address the lack of
community involvement in local emergency planning
in Ms. Bradshaw's community.

2.6	MaVynee Oshun Betsch, A.L. Lewis
Historical Society, American Beach, Florida

Ms. MaVynee Oshun Betsch, A.L. Lewis Historical
Society, American Beach, Florida, began her
presentation by noting that she is the great-
granddaughter of A.L. Lewis, who was Florida's first
black millionaire. A.L. Lewis founded American
Beach, a black beach community, in 1935, she said.
Ms. Betsch pointed out that there are three
telecommunications towers in the community. In
addition, she continued, the community is
surrounded by beach resorts, two paper mills,
several military bases, and a coal-fired plant.
Therefore, she stated, the air pollution is unbearable.
Black males in northeast Florida are more likely than
any other population to develop lung cancer, she
continued, and, blacks in general have a death rate
2.5 times higher than that for whites. Developers are
building seven new condominiums and placing the
sewage treatment plant right in her community, Ms.
Betsch said.

Ms. Betsch concluded by emphasizing that American
Beach is a very special and historical place. Ms.
Betsch requested that the Health and Research
Subcommittee of the NEJAC encourage EPA to
investigate air pollution cause by the towers. She
stated that the telecommunications towers "are going
up like cancer" that primarily affect black
communities.

2.7	Sarah Craven, Sierra Club, Atlanta, Georgia

Ms. Sarah Craven, Sierra Club, Atlanta, Georgia,
informed the members of the council that she would
be discussing some examples of how the current
regulatory processes and state agencies delegated
authority by EPA are failing the communities they are
designed to protect. Before the current year, she
said, Alabama had no regulations governing
concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFO) for
hogs. The Alabama Department of Environmental
Management (ADEM) allowed the CAFO industry to

recommend regulations, which the public then was
allowed to comment on, she explained. ADEM
appointed an environmental committee to provide
recommendations about CAFOs to ensure the
protection of public health and environmental quality,
but ADEM subsequently neglected to accept any of
the significant recommendations, she stated. As a
result, she continued, the regulations were written by
the corporations they were intended to regulate,
which has resulted in CAFOs operating 100 feet
from people's homes.

In Amelia, Louisiana, LDEQ issued a permit for
hazardous waste incinerator operated by GTX
without establishing any rules or regulations to
govern the operations of the incinerator, Ms. Craven
continued. The agency gave the public an
opportunity to voice concerns about the issuance of
the permit, but no agency decision maker was
present during that event, she stated. Ms. Craven
explained that the public was given only six weeks to
read an excessive amount of technical information,
learn to interpret that information, and provide
comments. All the critical EPA health impact studies
that demonstrate that the facility poses health risks
were hidden from the public throughout the comment
period, she said.

Ms. Craven pointed out that permit processes place
the expression of views by citizens at the mercy of
the agency, while the state agency justifies its
decision on the basis of information provided by the
corporation seeking the permit. Agencies are
charged with protecting the public, she stated, but
they cater instead, to the permitted industry.
Communities therefore are forced to use the court
system as their only recourse, and affordable
representation is rarely available, she said. Ms.
Craven stated that agencies should perform risk
assessments, impact studies, and health studies
before the permit process begins.

Mr. Luke Cole, Center on Race, Poverty, and the
Environment and chair of the Enforcement
Subcommittee of the NEJAC, informed Ms. Craven
that the Enforcement Subcommittee was to hear a
presentation on CAFOs during its meeting on the
following day and welcomed her participation in that
meeting.

2.8 Jeannie Economos, Farm Worker
Association of Florida, Apopka, Florida

Stating that her organization represents more than
7,000 farm workers in Florida, Ms. Jeannie
Economos, Farm Workers Association of Florida,
Apopka, Florida, expressed concern for the well-
being of farm workers because of the nation's

2-4

Atlanta, Georgia, May 23 and 24, 2000


-------
National Environmental Justice Advisory Council

Public Comment Periods

dependency on pesticides. Farm worker health is
jeopardized by exposure to pesticides, she said.
Despite the warnings set forth by Rachel Carson in
her book Silent Spring (Houghton Mifflin Company,
Boston, Massachusetts, 1962), the pesticide
situation is worse today than it was when that book
was published, she stated, with thousands of new
pesticides being approved every year.

Methyl bromide is one of the most toxic pesticides
and one of the most widely used today, Ms.
Economos continued. Even though use of methyl
bromide had been scheduled to be phased out by
2001, lobbying by "agribusiness" pushed the date
back to 2005, she said. Ms. Economos pointed out
that methyl bromide is 50 times more potent than
chlorofluorocarbons in destroying the ozone layer,
which leads to increased cancer rates. Instead of
pursuing sustainable alternatives like soil
solarization, integrated pest management, or crop
rotation, agribusiness is looking for a "quick-fix," she
stated. The Farm Workers Association currently is
protesting the use of toluene-2, which is being
proposed by agribusiness to replace methyl bromide,
she said.

Ms. Economos requested that EPA examine the
pesticide registration process and research into
alternatives to reduce the nation's dependence on
pesticides, especially methyl bromide. Mr. Cole then
pointed out that methyl bromide has a
disproportionate effect on residents of homes and
students in schools located near the fields on which
it is used. Mr. Cole stated that a Title VI
administrative complaint had been filed at EPA
because of exposure to methyl bromide in a Latino
community in California, but, he said, the Agency
had taken no action. Mr. Arnoldo Garcia, Urban
Habitat Program and chair of the International
Subcommittee of the NEJAC, stated that the issue
was to be discussed during the meeting of the
International Subcommittee on the following day.
Mr. Fernando Cuevas, Farm Labor Organizing
Committee and member of the International
Subcommittee of the NEJAC, noted that a friend of
his suffered a coma in 1979 after three days of
exposure to methyl bromide while working in
strawberry fields. Ms. Ramos pointed out the
possibility of a catastrophic accident while
transporting methyl bromide and stated that the
NEJAC should not overlook the issue.

2.9 Chavel Lopez, Southwest Public Workers
Union, San Antonio, Texas

Representing the Southwest Network for
Environmental and Economic Justice, Mr. Chavel
Lopez, Southwest Public Workers Union, San

Antonio, Texas, stated that people of color
throughout the Southwest are organizing to create
healthy communities. The Southwest Network is
composed of more than 70 grassroots organizations,
trade unions, and student groups throughout the
southwestern United States and Mexico, he
explained. For years, he continued, their
communities have been treated as expendable
members of society and have been exposed to toxic
contaminants. Health care institutions do not know
how to deal with the sicknesses that are a result of
exposure to toxic contaminants, Mr. Lopez said.

Mr. Lopez pointed out that low-income, working class
communities of color live in neighborhoods that are
affected disproportionately by environmental
hazards. In Los Angeles, California, a much higher
percentage of Latinos and African-Americans than
whites live in areas in which levels of air pollution are
dangerously high. In addition, he continued, rates of
lead poisoning and asthma among African-
Americans and Chicanos are higher than among
whites. For Navajo teenagers, cancer rates are 17
times the national average, while uranium spills from
mining activities on Navajo land occur frequently and
have contaminated theirwater, soil, and air, he said.
U.S. farm workers, a majority of whom are
minorities, are poisoned every year by pesticides, he
added. The disproportionate siting of polluting
industries and hazardous dumps in communities of
color has contributed to the poisoning of their people,
land, and air, he stated.

Mr. Lopez called upon the NEJAC to ensure that this
health crisis becomes a priority for EPA and all other
Federal agencies responsible for protecting people's
health and the environment. He then submitted a
summary of a "health symptoms survey" that was
conducted in San Antonio, Texas in communities
contaminated by pollutants originating from Kelly Air
Force Base. He stated that representatives of the
Southwest Network had a productive meeting with
Mr. Gregg Cooke, Regional Administrator of EPA
Region 6, and Mr. Jerry Clifford, Deputy Regional
Administrator of EPA Region 6, to discuss the
contaminated areas in Texas.

Ms. Vernice Miller-Travis, Partnership for
Sustainable Brownfields Development and chair of
the Waste and Facility Siting Subcommittee of the
NEJAC, asked Mr. Lopez what response his
organization has received from the Air Force. Mr.
Lopez stated that the Air Force did not accept the
health symptoms survey. The Agency for Toxic
Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR)
conducted a health assessment and found high
cancer rates in certain areas, but did not attribute the
sicknesses to contamination originating from the Air

Atlanta, Georgia, May23 and 24, 2000

2-5


-------
Public Comment Periods

National Environmental Justice Advisory Council

Force Base, he said. Ms. Rose Augustine,
Tucsonans for a Clean Environment and Vice Chair
of the Health and Research Subcommittee of the
NEJAC, asked about the need for adequate health
care. Mr. Lopez responded that the community does
not have adequate health care and that a majority of
the people of the community cannot afford to meet
their medical needs.

2.10 Marvin Crafter, Wollfolk Citizens Response
Group, Fort Valley, Georgia

Mr. Marvin Crafter, Wollfolk Citizens Response
Group, Fort Valley, Georgia, first stated that five
minutes is insufficient time for representatives of
communities affected by the problems created over
the past 100 years to set forth their concerns. He
then expressed a lack of trust in the NEJAC and
EPA, stating that those entities had not done enough
to reverse the problems affecting minority
communities today. The NEJAC has the reputation
of being "two-sided," he said, leaving the community
out of important decision-making processes. EPA is
supposed to protect people, he continued, but the
record of what has been done overthe past 15 years
shows that it has not done so, he stated.

Mr. Crafter informed the members of the council that
he recently had requested a list of recommendations
that the NEJAC had made to EPA, but that he had
not received the information. That experience, he
said, demonstrates to him that the actions of the
NEJAC have been inadequate to meet the needs of
communities affected by environmental justice
issues.

Mr. Crafter stated that communities are tired of being
assessed, when immediate action is necessary.
Requests for health care have fallen on deaf ears,
he said. Mr. Crafter requested that the scope of the
NEJAC be expanded to include a group of
consultants to affected communities from each EPA
region who would serve as a conduit between the
NEJAC and communities to assist in the
identification and addressing of the needs of those
communities. He also suggested that a series of
pre-NEJAC national committee meetings and other
outreach tools would facilitate the addressing of
community needs. Mr. Crafter then stated that too
much money is spent to analyze research. The
money would have been better spent on health care
for people in communities affected by contamination
originating from Superfund sites and Federal
facilities. He requested that the NEJAC recommend
EPA expand its relationship with ATSDR to provide
health care funding for communities affected by
contamination originating from sites on the National
Priority List (NPL) and Federal facilities.

2.11	Earnest Marshall, Ombudsman
Development Foundation Inc, Atlanta,
Georgia

Mr. Earnest Marshall, Ombudsman Development
Foundation Inc., Atlanta, Georgia, mentioned that
environmental conditions in several neighborhoods
in Atlanta, Georgia are causing numerous illnesses.
The University of Georgia's wastewater treatment
facility discharges waste into the Oconee River and
there is questionable dumping of radiation feed for
chickens, supposedlyto make their chickens bigger,
he said. Members of minority communities who live
in close proximity to a former General Motors site
that once manufactured munitions are becoming ill,
but they do not understand why, he added. ATSDR
and EPA examined that site, but nothing was done
beyond some research, he said.

Justice should be sought under Executive order
12898 on environmental justice, Mr. Marshall said.
Georgians have been told that they can no longer
eat fish from the Savannah River because of tritium
contamination, he pointed out. If EPA Region 4 is to
gain credibility, he stated, the region must deal with
the state of Georgia and with contaminated sites in
the region, he stated.

2.12	Henry Rodriguez, Native American
Environmental Protection Coalition, Valley
Center, California

Stating that he is a resident of the La Jolla
Reservation in north San Diego County, California,
Mr. Henry Rodriguez, Native American
Environmental Protection Coalition, Valley Center,
California, informed the members of the council that
a landfill had been sited next to a river on that
reservation. The proposed landfill would be located
adjacentto Medicine Mountain, where coming of age
ceremonies are held, he explained. Mr. Rodriguez
questioned the wisdom of siting a landfill adjacent to
a river. At a recent meeting in California, he added,
engineers had discussed the technical aspects of the
landfill, but did not consider its effect on the
community. Mr. Rodriguez requested that the
NEJAC examine the issue.

2.13	Elodia Blanco, Concerned Citizens of
Agriculture Street Landfill, New Orleans,
Louisiana

Stating that her community overlies a toxic landfill,
Ms. Elodia Blanco, Concerned Citizens of Agriculture
Street Landfill, New Orleans, Louisiana, described
the development of her African-American
community. The U.S. Department of Housing and

2-6

Atlanta, Georgia, May 23 and 24, 2000


-------
National Environmental Justice Advisory Council

Public Comment Periods

Urban Development (HUD) had approved funds
under a Federal grant to allow the city of New
Orleans to build the community on top of a toxic
landfill, she explained. She pointed out that no
efforts were made to inform new homeowners about
the landfill underlying their property when they
purchased the homes. The Agriculture Street
Landfill covers 100 acres and was in use from 1910
until 1960, she stated. Exposure to more than 150
toxins, heavy metals, and carcinogens has led to
elevated incidences of birth defects and breast
cancer in her community, she added.

Ms. Blanco, stated that several attempts had been
made to recommend that EPA Region 6 support
relocation of the community, but those attempts were
ignored. The remediation plan proposed by EPA will
clean only 10 percent of the site and will increase the
risk of broken water lines, she said. Ms. Blanco
urged the council to take the necessary steps to
request that EPA consider a relocation plan. Ms.
Miller-Travis suggested that representatives of Ms.
Blanco's organization speak with Mr. Kent Benjamin,
Outreach and Special Project Staff, EPA Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER),
and Designated Federal Official (DFO) of the Waste
and Facility Siting Subcommittee.

2.14Jerilyn Lopez Mendoza, Environmental
Defense, Los Angeles, California

Ms. Jerilyn Mendoza, Environmental Defense, Los
Angeles, California, stated that her organization
focuses on ensuring equal access to clean parks
and schools for children, ensuring transportation
equity, and alleviating exposure to toxics. Several
ongoing campaigns in Los Angeles are related
specifically to environmental justice, she said.
Expansion of the Los Angeles International Airport
will have direct effects on the neighboring
community, Inglewood, she stated. Airport traffic is
projected to almost double by the year 2020, she
explained, which would increase the environmental
degradation already suffered in the predominantly
African-American community, which includes noise
pollution and air pollution related to diesel emissions
from airplanes and trucks. Environmental Defense,
in conjunction with a number of other organizations,
is attempting to persuade airport authorities to
address environmental equity and justice issues in
their planning, she said. Ms. Mendoza said that
Environmental Defense also is working to encourage
those authorities to promote participation by
communities in the planning process.

In addition, Environmental Defense is working with
environmental and community groups to increase
the amount of green space for children in Los

Angeles, she said. Ms. Mendoza explained that, in
Los Angeles, there is a vast disparity in green space
in communities; that disparity, she pointed out, is
related directly to race and income. Chinatown, a
predominantly Asian section of Los Angeles, has no
open space, no parks, and no schools, she stated.
Environmental Defense is working to persuade the
city to commit a 47-acre plot of unused land in the
community for use for schools and parks. Ms.
Mendoza stated that she would appreciate speaking
with anyone on the council who had any insight into
these issues she had raised.

2.15	Donald Brown, People for Environmental
Progress and Sustainability, Vallejo,
California

Mr. Donald Brown, People for Environmental
Progress and Sustainability, Vallejo, California,
stated that there is a need to clearly define
environmental justice and the relationship of that
concept to the civil rights movement. He added that
there is a communication gap between industry and
the communities in matters related to environmental
justice. He pointed out that representatives of
industry never attend meetings of the NEJAC. Mr.
Brown stated that our country focuses many of its
resources on problems that occur abroad; that focus
limits what is done about contaminated communities
in our country. While the global economy is moving
forward rapidly, he continued, the problems that
existed in minority communities years ago persist
today. Mr. Brown emphasized that the time to act is
now and that people must "stick together" and trust
each other to effectively achieve their goals.

Ms. Patricia Hill Wood, Georgia Pacific Corporation
and member of the Waste and Facility Siting
Subcommittee of the NEJAC, stated that a number
of industry representatives were in attendance at the
meeting. Those representatives she said, are
concerned about environmental justice issues. Ms.
Wood stated that several members of the NEJAC
are industry representatives. Mr. Brown responded
that he hoped Ms. Wood would make resources
available to cleanup communities. He stated that
industry pays for remediation when a certain incident
occurs but does not change processes or actions.

2.16	Bill Burns, Environmental Awareness
Foundation, Atlanta, Georgia

Stating that his organization addresses household
health hazards, Mr. Bill Burns, Environmental
Awareness Foundation, Atlanta, Georgia, stated that
lead poisoning is a significant problem in the state of
Georgia. According to Mr. Burns, the city of Atlanta
does not have a telephone contact that people in the

Atlanta, Georgia, May23 and 24, 2000

2-7


-------
Public Comment Periods

National Environmental Justice Advisory Council

city can call to obtain information about lead
poisoning, a situation that his organization would like
to change, he stated. He said that the
Environmental Awareness Foundation had gathered
statistics and facts that demonstrate that lead
contamination and asthma are significant problems
in communities in Atlanta. Mr. Burns asked for
advice from the NEJAC about how he can obtain
information, funding, and resources to allow the
community to address the issue.

Dr. Payton asked Mr. Burns whether there is a lead
poisoning prevention program in the state of
Georgia. Mr. Burns responded that Georgia had
reimplemented its lead poisoning program, but noted
that the program is not reaching the community. Ms.
Peggy Shepard, West Harlem Environmental Action;
member of the Health and Research Subcommittee
of the NEJAC; and Vice Chair of the Executive
Council, suggested that the Environmental
Awareness Foundation considerapplyingforan EPA
environmental justice grant to acquire resources to
undertake a community education campaign.

2.17 Samara Swanston, Sierra Club, Brooklyn,
New York

Noting that she would be speaking on behalf of two
organizations, Ms. Samara Swanston, Sierra Club,
Brooklyn, New York, stated that the National Sierra
Club is opposed to the National Association of Home
Builders (NAHB) bill. The NAHB bill is brownfields
legislation that would permit owners to build homes
on contaminated land and would abrogate EPA's
enforcement authority under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act (CERCLA) in a situation in which
imminent and substantial danger exist because a
home builder wanted to construct homes on
contaminated land, she said. Undercurrent law, she
continued, EPA has the authority to order a polluter
to stop a release or a threatened release and to
impose fines if the polluter fails to cooperate. The
proposed NAHB bill weakens Federal provisions
under CERCLA that protect communities from
economic, health, and environmental consequences
resulting from inadequate cleanup of Superfund
sites, she explained. Ms. Swanston stated that
underthe NAHB bill, the ability of EPA and the public
to provide oversight of brownfields sites is impeded
by provisions that allow the state to withhold the
names and locations of facilities undergoing
voluntary cleanup.

Ms. Swanston stated that the Sierra Club would like
to propose stringent cleanup standards to protect
human health, retention of Federal enforcement
authority, and provision of financial assistance to
help communities assess and remediate brownfields

properties. She also pointed out that substantive
public participation should be provided for early in
the brownfields redevelopment process.

Ms. Swanston then stated that she also was
speaking on behalf of Minority Environmental
Lawyers who represent a community group in Dobbs
Ferry, New York that is working to protect a
historical, indigenous site. According to Ms.
Swanston, the site qualifies for listing on the National
Register of Historic Sites. The state of New York is
allowing the destruction of cultural sites like the one
she had described, she said. Ms. Swanston read a
letter prepared by the director of the community
group that stated that the sacred site had been
desecrated by the siting there of a demolition landfill
and the construction of townhouses. Ms. Swanston
added that, every year, a bill is brought before the
New York state legislature to protect such sites that
are not on a reservation, but the legislation never
passes, she said. The NEJAC and the U.S.
Department of the Interior (DOI) should take action
against the state of New York if the state continues
to allow the destruction of archaeological sites, she
declared.

Ms. Miller-Travis asked Ms. Swanston about the
status of the NAHB bill in Congress. Ms. Swanston
replied that EPA supports the bill and that it probably
would be introduced.

2.18 Michelle Xenos, Shundahai Network, Las
Vegas, Nevada

Noting that she had spoken at the meeting of the
NEJAC in Arlington, Virginia, in December 1999, Ms.
Michelle Xenos, Shundahai Network, Las Vegas,
Nevada, stated that she lives an hour south of the
Nevada Nuclear Test Site, where the proposed
Yucca Mountain high-level nuclear waste dump is to
be located. There is a lack of monitoring of Federal
facilities, she pointed out, and the public does not
have access to U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) or
DoD information about environmental effects. Ms.
Xenos explained that she grew up on an island on
which more than 3,000 nuclear weapons were
located and near a location at which millions of
gallons of radioactive waste had been dumped into
Pearl Harbor. Breast cancer rates in that area are
10 times higher than average, she stated. The
environmental effects of nuclear weapons are felt
throughout the process of nuclear development,
from uranium mining to detonation, she continued.
Ms. Xenos requested that the NEJAC establish a
subcommittee to examine the operations of Federal
facilities because, she stated, "they are not held
accountable for anything."

2-8

Atlanta, Georgia, May 23 and 24, 2000


-------
National Environmental Justice Advisory Council

Public Comment Periods

2.19	Jay Gilbert Sanchez, Tribal Environmental
Watch Alliance, Espanola, New Mexico

Mr. Jay Gilbert Sanchez, Tribal Environmental
Watch Alliance, Espanola, New Mexico, stated that
he lives near the Los Alamos National Laboratory.
Mr. Sanchez acknowledged that EPA does not have
the authority to monitor DoD and DOE, both of
which, he charged, operate without considering the
effects of those operations on human health and the
environment. Stating that he also is the chairman of
the People of Color Disenfranchised Communities,
Mr. Sanchez explained that the effect of Federal
facilities extends beyond the United States to
adversely affect people in Puerto Rico, U.S. western
territories, and the Pacific Ocean.

Mr. Sanchez discussed the fire at the Los Alamos
National Laboratory that had been burning for 14
days. He explained that air quality is declining,
stating that the air pollution caused by the fire "will be
around forever." Mr. Sanchez asked that the
members of the NEJAC address the issue of Federal
facilities and the effects of their operations.

Mr. Goldtooth asked Mr. Sanchez whetherthere was
evidence of radioactive contamination outside the
facility that could have been released into the
atmosphere during the burn. Mr. Sanchez
responded that the flora and fauna around the
laboratory are contaminated. Mr. Clifford stated that
the New Mexico environmental department had
asked EPA Region 6 to conduct additional air
sampling, beyond that performed by DOE. There
was concern not only about plutonium in the
concrete vaults, he continued, but also about the
solid waste management units throughout the site
that are contaminated with chemical and radioactive
wastes. Data from 20 air monitors, Mr. Clifford said,
indicated no increase in radiation as a result of the
fire. Mr. Clifford confirmed that air monitors did not
begin operating until several days after the fire
began. Mr. Sanchez pointed out that the wind had
not been blowing in the direction of the monitors. Mr.
Sanchez reiterated that he has firsthand proof that
there is contamination on the site. How can the
government be trusted, he stated, when it is obvious
that its representatives are not being honest with
American citizens.

2.20	Teresa Juarez, New Mexico Alliance,
Chimayo, New Mexico

Ms. Teresa Juarez, New Mexico Alliance, Chimayo,
New Mexico, expressed herdismay about the variety
of issues and concerns in communities described by
commenters who had preceded her. She then
explained that she lives near the Los Alamos
controlled burn site that had been burning out of

control for days. "Nobody knows what kinds of
contaminants are being released into the air people
are breathing," she said, pointing out that many of
the burned houses also contain asbestos. People
were told that plutonium at the Los Alamos
Laboratory was enclosed in concrete vaults and that
there was nothing to worry about, she said, but,
months earlier, a meeting was held at which 450
workers expressed concern about contamination
buried around the site and elevated cancer rates.
Ms. Juarez demanded of the council that a
subcommittee be established to address issues
related to Federal facilities.

Ms. Juarez pointed out that a majority of the
firefighters on site were Native Americans and
Hispanics and that they were not properly protected.
"When the government can prove to us that there is
no contamination, then we will be satisfied," she
said. Mr. Cole stated that it is not credible that a fire
of such magnitude can burn without increasing the
level of chemicals in air. Mr. Clifford then stated in
clarification that the levels of chemical and
radioactive contamination the monitoring indicated
were no higher than those that would be found
during a typical forest fire.

2.21 Mark Mitchell, Connecticut Coalition for
Environmental Justice, Hartford,
Connecticut

Mr. Mark Mitchell, Connecticut Coalition for
Environmental Justice, Hartford, Connecticut, stated
that his group provides assistance to local
organizations in Connecticut. A few years earlier, he
continued, the group formed the Hartford
Environmental Justice Network. Hartford is 78
percent black and Latino, he pointed out, and
incomes in the city are very low in a state that is very
wealthy. Hartford has more waste disposal facilities
than any other city in the state of Connecticut, the
largest sewage treatment plant and sewage sludge
incinerator in Connecticut, and the largest trash
incinerator in the state, he said. The trash
incinerator has an average of 100 fire calls per year,
as well as a major explosion or fire approximately
once a month, he added. Eight regional waste
facilities and four power plants are located in the
eight-square-mile area surrounding the community,
he said.

Mr. Mitchell pointed out that the Hartford
Environmental Justice Network has had several
successes, including the removal of a power plant
that was built without any public notification or
hearings. In addition, he said, the organization
persuaded the city council to ban a ninth regional
waste facility. Mr. Mitchell stated that the group is
very concerned about the city's asthma rates, which,

Atlanta, Georgia, May23 and 24, 2000

2-9


-------
Public Comment Periods

National Environmental Justice Advisory Council

he said, are the highest in the country. Forty-one
percent of the community's children have asthma, he
explained. He requested that the NEJAC address
the asthma epidemic in Hartford's communities and
that EPA fund research into alternative waste
disposal technologies that would eliminate
hazardous air pollutants.

Ms. Miller-Travis asked Mr. Mitchell whether he had
conversed with Ms. Jane Stahl, Assistant
Commissioner of the Connecticut Department of
Environmental Protection and member of the Health
and Research Subcommittee. Mr. Mitchell stated
that representatives of his organization had spoken
with Ms. Stahl and that the organization has a good
relationship with her department. Ms. Miller-Travis
informed Mr. Mitchell that Ms. Stahl is a member of
the NEJAC, suggesting that he discuss with Ms.
Stahl the specific initiatives and actions he would like
the NEJAC to take. Mr. Mitchell stated that some of
the research should be funded on the Federal level,
stating that such funding was the purpose for which
he had brought the issue to the NEJAC. Ms.
Shepard asked what relationship the organization
has with the state Department of Environmental
Protection's Office of Environment Equity. Mr.
Mitchell stated that the organization worked closely
with that office, but that progress is slow.

Mr. Charles Lee, Associate Director for Policy and
Interagency Liaison, Office of Environmental Justice
(OEJ), EPA Office of Enforcement and Compliance
and Assurance (OECA) and DFO of the Executive
Council, requested that Mr. Mitchell elaborate on the
recommendation that the NEJAC examine the
asthma epidemic. Mr. Mitchell responded that there
is a link between air pollution and respiratory
illnesses. EPA should address those relationships,
he said. Mr. Lee pointed out to the members of the
NEJAC that one approach to addressing health
issues related to environmental justice is to examine
specific diseases and illnesses. Mr. Mitchell pointed
out that, in the United States, asthma is an epidemic
that affects urban areas and minorities
disproportionately.

2.22 Le Vonne Stone, Fort Ord Environmental
Justice Network, Marina, California

Noting that she had spoken before the NEJAC
several years earlier, Ms. LeVonne Stone, Fort Ord
Environmental Justice Network, Marina, California,
explained that Fort Ord is one of the largest
Superfund sites in the country. The goal of her
organization when she spoke before the NEJAC
earlier was to secure help for affected communities
through the establishment of health clinics and
through testing for contamination, she explained.
She said that smoke from emissions, detonations,

and large burns aggravates respiratory problems,
especially in sensitive children and adults. Even the
Federal workers are concerned about the safety of
their work environment, she pointed out. The
communities have seen their economic base
deteriorate because of the closing of massive
facilities, she continued. Those areas must be
cleaned up to ensure the safety of communities, she
stated. The local Army environmental division has
spent more than $350 million on the cleanup of Fort
Ord since 1993, but no health clinics have been
established in affected communities, she explained.

Ms. Stone stated that she wants to see the site
cleaned up and that the community should be
involved in the process. Mr. Turrentine explained
that, before the end of the current meeting, the
NEJAC hoped to develop a process for dealing with
issues related to Federal facilities. He stated that
the NEJAC hoped to establish a working group that
will initiate interaction with members of affected
communities. Ms. Stone indicated that she also
would like to see an end to the intimidation and
harassment of individuals in the community who
bring up health issues.

2.23 Rabbi Dan Swartz, Children's
Environmental Health Network, Washington,
D.C.

Rabbi Dan Swartz, Children's Environmental Health
Network, Washington, D.C., explained that the same
forces that exploit people for racial or economic
reasons also exploit children because of their lack of
political and economic power. Rabbi Swartz said he
recently had attended a private seminar on children's
environmental health sponsored by the
Congressional Research Service. He expressed
concern about policies that might result from the
meeting, pointing out that many of the participants
were representatives of polluting industries who
claim that the public already is protected by existing
environmental standards. No minorities attended the
seminar, he added, and the issue of environmental
justice would not have been brought up if he had not
done so.

Rabbi Swartz pointed out that many of the
protections currently implemented on behalf of
children may disappear, including the abolition of the
Office of Children's Environmental Health Protection
in two years. It is time to think about the future, he
stated, and to plan for our children's health,
especially that of those who suffer from
environmental discrimination.

2-10

Atlanta, Georgia, May 23 and 24, 2000


-------
National Environmental Justice Advisory Council

Public Comment Periods

2.24	Jim MacDonald, Pittsburg Unified School
District, Pittsburg, California

As an elected official of the Pittsburg Unified School
District, Mr. Jim MacDonald, Pittsburg Unified School
District, Pittsburg, California, stated that it is his
responsibility to look after the health and welfare of
the children in his district. Mr. MacDonald pointed
out that state and Federal agencies are rewriting
what constitutes an environmental justice
community. He explained that the California Energy
Commission requires that a community have a
population of at least 130,000 before they will
consider environmental justice. His city has a
population of 60,000, he continued. Even though
that population is 70 percent minority, the community
is not considered a minority community for purposes
of consideration of environmental justice, he said.

The Pittsburg Unified School District requested that
EPA Region 9 designate the city an environmental
justice community, Mr. MacDonald said. He pointed
out that there are four major power plants and four
minor power plants, a major chemical facility, and
several refineries in the city. EPA responded that
the Agency does not have the authority to designate
environmental justice communities, he said. The
Pittsburg Unified School District filed a complaint
against EPA Region 9 with EPA's Office of Civil
Rights (OCR) for violation of Title VI, he stated. EPA
is at fault, Mr. MacDonald continued, because the
Agency is supposed to enforce environmental justice
regulations. Environmental impact reports should be
required in minority and low-income school districts
and should be presented to the school district, not to
EPA, he said.

2.25	Jackie Ward, Southern Organizing
Committee for Economic and Social
Justice, Brunswick, Georgia

Ms. Jackie Ward, Southern Organizing Committee
for Economic and Social Justice, Brunswick,
Georgia, read a letter sent to Ms. Connie Tucker,
Southern Organizing Committee for Economic and
Social Justice, Brunswick, Georgia and former
member of the Waste and Facility Siting
Subcommittee of the NEJAC, by Reverend Zack
Lyde, Save the People, Brunswick, Georgia.
Reverend Lyde explained that his mother had fallen
ill because of toxic shock. Her illness originally had
been misdiagnosed as liver cancer, he wrote.
Toxicity in a community is not taken into
consideration when performing a medical diagnosis,
he stated. Reverend Lyde stated that the NEJAC
should investigate lack of health insurance and
misdiagnosis of illnesses in contaminated
communities. He also recommended that the
NEJAC establish a pollution victims compensation

fund to receive revenue from a pollution tax on all
releases reported to the Toxic Release Inventory
(TRI). Such a tax also would serve to encourage
industries to reduce toxic discharges, he wrote.

2.26	Fred Lincoln, Wando Concerned Citizen
Committee, Wando, South Carolina

Stating that he lives in a small African-American
community, Mr. Fred Lincoln, Wando Concerned
Citizen Committee, Wando, South Carolina,
explained that the community has been inundated
with pollution from chemical plants and steel mills.
According to Mr. Lincoln, no environmental impact
study was performed and no community hearing was
held when a chemical plant recently was sited "right
in the middle of the community." Currently, a railroad
route is proposed that would run through the
community, displacing 30 percent of the homes, he
said. The community was not notified of the
meetings held between the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE), EPA, and the port authority of
South Carolina, he stated. Mr. Lincoln stated that
EPA is supposed to protect citizens and that the
community should have been notified about the
railroad before the decisions became final.
Members of the community are concerned that their
community was chosen arbitrarily to be destroyed
when there is vacant property nearby that could have
been used to house the facilities, he said.

2.27	Adora Iris Lee, United Church of Christ
Commission for Racial Justice,
Washington, D.C.

Rev. Adora Iris Lee, United Church of Christ
Commission for Racial Justice, Washington, D.C.,
submitted a written report to the Executive Council.
For 60 years, the U.S. Navy has used the island of
Vieques, Puerto Rico as a target range, causing
human health problems and environmental
degradation, she said. The United Church of Christ
Commission for Racial Justice urged the council to
investigate EPA's plans to cleanup the affected
areas, investigate health-related problems in
Vieques, and continue to deny the U.S. Navy
permission to conduct bombing activity that results
in discharges into the water, she stated.

2.28	Maria Elena Lucas, Farm Worker, Arlington,
Texas

Ms. Maria Elena Lucas, farm worker, Arlington,
Texas, stated that she has been a migrant farm
worker all her life and that therefore she has suffered
lifelong exposure to many chemicals and pesticides.
In 1988, she continued, she experienced an
accidental exposure that had a lasting effect on her
memory and a variety of other neurological functions.

Atlanta, Georgia, May23 and 24, 2000

2-11


-------
Public Comment Periods

National Environmental Justice Advisory Council

Ms. Lucas explained that she continues to have
numerous problems. She stated further that hers is
not an isolated case. She pointed out that migrant
camps are located next to the fields on which
pesticides are applied. Research on pesticides and
exposure to pesticides has been insufficient, she
said.

Mr. Garcia noted that Ms. Lucas was to attend the
meeting of the International Subcommittee, and that
she was to make a presentation to that body. He
reiterated that there are thousands of cases like that
of Ms. Lucas today.

Closing the public comment period for the evening,
Mr. Turrentine referred to the videotape "Eyes on the
Prize," noting that issues that were focused on
during the civil rights movement are still at play
today. It is troubling, he observed, that communities
must come begging to the NEJAC to make their
problems known, he said. He stated that the NEJAC
must begin to realize results. Ms. Augustine stated
that there is a need to evaluate whether the NEJAC
is accomplishing its goals and whetherthe NEJAC is
representative of the people it is supposed to
represent. Mr. Cole then stated that such remarks
should be presented to the Administrator to
encourage EPA to begin to respond to the advice the
NEJAC gives the Agency.

3.0 FOCUSED PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD
HELD ON MAY 24, 2000

This section summarizes the comments presented
to the Executive Council during the public comment
period on May 24, 2000, along with the questions
and observations those comments prompted among
members of the Executive Council.

Comments are summarized below in the order in
which they were offered.

3.1 Mable Anderson, Village Creek Human and
Environmental Society, Birmingham,
Alabama

Indicating that she would discuss two issues, Ms.
Mable Anderson, Village Creek Human and
Environmental Society, Birmingham, Alabama,
stated that she recently had returned to Alabama to
lead her community in the battle against
environmental injustice. She stated that water in
Village Creek, polluted as a result of agricultural and
industrial activities, tends to flood people's homes.
In 1997, she said, the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) provided a buyout of
$5 million for relocation of 125 homes. However,
she continued, people still have cancer, asthma, and

other health problems to deal with. Ms. Anderson
complained that universities and other groups that
study contamination in the community neglect to
inform the community of the types of studies they are
doing, charging that such groups do not know what
the community's health problems are. Ms. Anderson
informed the NEJAC that her organization needs
funding to implement a health proposal developed by
the community. She requested the NEJAC's help in
funding such a proposal and informing other Federal
agencies about it.

Ms. Anderson added that her organization also was
requesting the NEJAC's help in conducting a creek-
bank restoration project intended to improve water
flow. One high school is located on the bank of the
creek, and another is under construction on the
bank, she stated. She noted that school authorities
do not know that the waters are contaminated with
agricultural and industrial wastes. Ms. Anderson
stated that the community wishes to reclassify the
area of the creek bed from industrial and agricultural
use to residential use.

3.2 Karl Fuller, Pechanga Environmental
Program, Temecula, California

Mr. Karl Fuller, Pechanga Environmental Program,
Temecula, California, a resident of the Pechanga
Indian Reservation, stated that a draft environmental
impact statement had been prepared to build a
landfill in Gregory Canyon, California. Five Indian
reservations lie in the immediate vicinity of the
proposed landfill site, he said. The landfill would
affect Indian tribes disproportionately, he explained,
because the tribes do not generate large amounts of
waste; therefore, the effect the facility would have on
the tribes cannot be justified, he declared.

Mr. Fuller pointed out that important village and
ancestral sites of the Pala Band of Mission Indians
are found in Gregory Canyon and Mount Gregory
and that these sites are sacred for the Luiseno Tribe.
The environmental impact statement addresses that
issue to some extent, he said, and the proposed
project includes the preservation of areas at
relatively high elevations on Mount Gregory.
However, Mr. Fuller explained, the sacred
ceremonies are conducted at sites at all elevations,
not solely at the top of the mountain. Odors and
other undesirable effects of a waste facility would
desecrate the site, no matter what efforts might be
taken to mitigate those effects, he said.

Another issue the impact statement does not
address sufficiently, he stated, are the potential
effects the proposed landfill might have on
groundwater in the area. Water from Gregory

2-12

Atlanta, Georgia, May 23 and 24, 2000


-------
National Environmental Justice Advisory Council

Public Comment Periods

Canyon, he continued, can be dispersed to many
different water supplies, such as the San Luis Rey
Water Basin. He explained that the mitigation
measure intended to protect the water supply puts a
limit on the quantity of water that the applicant is
liable for if contamination should occur; he then
expressed the opinion that the limit is too low. In
conclusion, Mr. Fuller stated that enforcement also
is included in the environmental impact statement as
a mitigation measure, observing that enforcement is
not an adequate form of mitigation.

3.3 Cecil Corbin-Mark, West Harlem
Environmental Action, New York, New York

Mr. Cecil Corbin-Mark, West Harlem Environmental
Action, New York, New York, stated that, despite
substantial improvements in the nation's health,
minorities still fare worse than their white
counterparts. Disparities in health status persist, he
explained, and communities of color suffer
disproportionately from a variety of illnesses.
Current disparities demonstrate the need for the
development of strategies to address the health
problems of minority communities, he said. He
pointed out that the development of strategies to
reduce such health disparities require that
policymakers be educated about environmental
conditions in minority communities and that the
social environment of such communities be
examined.

West Harlem Environmental Action has worked for
the past five years to promote community-based
research for the benefit of the Northern Manhattan
Community Reserve, said Mr. Corbin-Mark. That
effort is being accomplished through collaborative
partnerships, he explained. The first study
conducted by the group involved exposure to diesel
fuel exhaust and lung function among adolescents in
Harlem, he stated. The study, he pointed out,
showed that 76 percent of participating students had
been exposed to detectable levels of diesel fuel
exhaust. By presenting air monitoring data to
policymakers, the group hopes to help bring about a
change in policies that affect air quality in minority
communities, he explained. He noted that, after 13
years of fighting, New York City finally is beginning to
use clean-fuel buses to reduce diesel exhaust. Mr.
Corbin-Mark requested that the NEJAC examine
some of the models produced under West Harlem
Environmental Action's partnerships and call upon
EPA to provide more funding for the research and
approaches those models demonstrate. In addition,
Mr. Corbin-Mark recommended that EPA reestablish
the Community-University Partnership grant
program.

3.4	Michael Lythcott, The Lythcott Company,
Marlboro, New Jersey

Mr. Michael Lythcott, The Lythcott Company,
Marlboro, New Jersey and Relocation Advisor for
Citizens AgainstToxic Exposure, Pensacola, Florida,
provided the Executive Council of the NEJAC an
update on the progress of the national Superfund
relocation pilot project underway in Pensacola,
Florida. Since the meeting of the NEJAC in
Arlington, Virginia in December 1999, he said,
representatives of EPA Region 4 have demonstrated
due diligence in responding to and investigating
every allegation and problem brought to their
attention, he said. Mr. Lythcott then pointed out that
the relocation differential payment remains a crucial
issue. He explained that, after property has been
appraised, the resident searches for a house at a
comparable price in a clean neighborhood. Such
houses almost always cost more than the appraised
value of the contaminated property. There is money
available to make up the difference between the
appraised value and the cost of the replacement
housing, he continued. However, he pointed out,
owners who do not reside at the affected property
are not eligible to receive any of that money. That
policy, he said, is discrimination, noting that property
owners, who do not live at the affected property,
should not suffer financially because of relocation.

Mr. Lythcott also stated that some residents remain
"trapped" at the Escambia Arms Apartment complex
because they are unable to afford the move
themselves, and EPA and the USACE will not offer
those residents any help until Escambia Arms comes
to agreement with the government. Escambia Arms
Apartments are located in Pensacola, Florida, near
the Superfund site associated with the abandoned
Escambia Wood Treating Company. Residents
there are living in toxic conditions, he stated, and
they suffer from numerous health problems. In
addition, he continued, babies are being born with
birth defects. Mr. Lythcott requested access to the
negotiations between Escambia Arms Apartments
and EPA so that he can inform the residents of the
status of the relocation process. He also requested
that the NEJAC help him obtain a copy of a report
being prepared by HUD on the living conditions in
the apartment complex that is to be used in pressing
for a quick settlement.

3.5	Lionel Dyson, Public Interest Law Center of
Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Mr. Lionel Dyson, Public Interest Law Center of
Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, began his
comment by declaring that the development of a
substantive national environmental justice policy that

Atlanta, Georgia, May23 and 24, 2000

2-13


-------
Public Comment Periods

National Environmental Justice Advisory Council

incorporates public health criteria is essential to
bringing about meaningful change. The NEJAC's
handout, Community-Based Health Model
Discussion, he pointed out, states that one should
not treat minority, low-income communities through
an "all things being equal approach," stating that it is
obvious that there is currently no equality in terms of
the baseline health status of communities of color
and low-income communities. Whether or not the
substandard health of a community is a result of
toxic exposures or inequities in socioeconomic
opportunities and educational attainment is
irrelevant, he pointed out. He explained that health
considerations are linked inextricably to the search
for solutions to problems related to environmental
justice, he explained. Mr. Dyson stated that EPA's
Title VI Interim Guidance for Investigating
Administrative Complaints Which Challenge
Permitting Decisions is fundamentally flawed
because it excludes public health considerations.

The Law Center of Philadelphia has proposed an
alternative policy called the Environmental Justice
Protocol and tested that policy for the city of
Philadelphia, continued Mr. Dyson. The protocol, he
explained, requires the parametric mapping of four
health criteria in Philadelphia: noncancer mortality,
cancer mortality, infant mortality, and low birth
weight. In addition, he continued, spacial analysis of
demographic data is incorporated into the analysis.
The rationale of the protocol is that, if certain
population groups already are experiencing
substandard health, those groups should not be
subjected to further environmental depredation, he
stated. He pointed out that, in Philadelphia, 94
percent of those living in the areas in which health
statistics are poorest are minorities. Mr. Dyson
stated that, if his organization can develop a health-
based method for securing environmental justice in
the city of Philadelphia, the EPA, with all of the
available resources of the Federal government,
should be able to devise a policy to ensure the
protection of the entire nation. Mr. Dyson urged the
NEJAC to take action now, stating that the
integration of health considerations into an
environmental justice policy begins with the NEJAC.

3.6 Daisy Carter, Project Awake, Coatopa,
Alabama

Ms. Daisy Carter, Project Awake, Coatopa,
Alabama, told the members of the Executive Council
that her community needs help in acquiring funding
to improve its water system. She stated that the
county in which her community is located is the site
of a large hazardous waste dump that has been
receiving waste for more than 30 years from
50 states and 17 countries. Members of the

community are concerned that waste is leaking from
trenches into the aquifer that provides the
community's water, she explained, and the town is
unable to purchase the equipment necessary to
bring the water system up to date. Ms. Carter noted
that she recently had called the appropriate state
department about the water system, and that
department had informed her that the system
currently was being cited for a violation. Ms. Carter
pointed out that the citizens of the community suffer
from a variety of health problems, including rashes,
cancers, and kidney problems.

Ms. Carter stated further that water from the aquifer
is salty, which can lead to hypertension and high
blood pressure in individuals who consume that
water. Every citizen has a right to safe drinking
water, she stated. She asked that the NEJAC
provide her community with some financial
assistance or advise the community about applying
for a grant. Mr. Robert Varney, New Hampshire
Department of Environmental Services, Concord,
New Hampshire and member of the Enforcement
Subcommittee of the NEJAC, stated that his
department had worked with several communities to
improve their public water systems. One source of
funding, he explained, is the U.S. Department of
Agriculture's rural development program, which
provides grants and low-interest loans to
communities. He added that low-interest loans also
are available under the state revolving fund (SRF)
low-interest loan program, which, he noted, is
available in Alabama. Ms. Ramos asked Ms. Carter
whether any agencies had tested the water in her
community. Ms. Carter replied that members of the
community had been buying test tubes and sending
water for analysis themselves, but that no agencies
had performed testing for them. Ms. Ramos
declared that the issue was an urgent matter that
EPA should address immediately.

3.7 Gary Grant, Concerned Citizens of Tillery,
Tillery, North Carolina

Addressing the issue of cesspools in rural America,
Mr. Gary Grant, Concerned Citizens of Tillery, Tillery,
North Carolina, stated that vertically integrated
industries raising confined animals are entering
predominantly African-American communities in
rural America. Many of those communities rely on
well water, he said, and no guidelines are
established to govern the digging of cesspools for
the CAFOs. Waste from cesspools seeps into
groundwater and eventually migrates to well water,
explained Mr. Grant. North Carolina has no
requirements governing the design of cesspools, he
continued, and no permit is required for their use.
The odor is offensive, and respiratory problems are

2-14

Atlanta, Georgia, May 23 and 24, 2000


-------
National Environmental Justice Advisory Council

Public Comment Periods

elevated in areas in which people live near CAFOs,
he stated. The industry recently has learned how to
mask the odor, he said, but members of the affected
communities still must breathe the harmful airborne
agents.

Mr. Grant stated that EPA is working to develop
standard guidelines for cesspools. EPA, he noted,
does not know what communities are being exposed
to because "they don't live where we do," said Mr.
Grant. He added that environmental justice issues
are not confined to urban America alone; rural
America has such issues, as well. Mr. Cole stated
that Mr. Grant was to attend the meeting of the
Enforcement Subcommittee on the following day; the
subcommittee was scheduled to discuss the issue
further, noted Mr. Cole.

3.8 Omar Freilla, New York City Environmental
Justice Alliance, New York, New York

Mr. Omar Freilla, New York City Environmental
Justice Alliance, New York, NewYork, stated that his
organization focuses on low-income communities of
color that suffer from asthma epidemics. He pointed
out that low-income communities of color have some
of the highest asthma rates in the country. Mr.
Freilla noted that he would discuss two factors that
are blocking the adequate assessment of
environmental injustices in New York City.

First, Mr. Freilla stated, environmental impact studies
performed in New York City do not take into account
actual effects on a neighborhood. He pointed out
that such studies consider environmental effects
citywide, but not the local effects. Many projects are
approved, he explained, because the focus of the
study is much broader than on the actual area that
would be affected. Mr. Freilla asked that the NEJAC
encourage EPA in turn to urge New York City to
address the issue adequately. An example of such
problems, he continued, is the battle over interim
garbage export contracts in New York City. Tens of
thousands of trucks are proposed to export garbage
from the city through primarily low-income
communities of color, he explained. The impact
study for the proposal examines the impact on the
city as a whole, instead of the individual routes
traveled, he pointed out.

The second issue, he continued, is that the
metropolitan planning organization for the greater
New York City area has failed to monitor compliance
with Title VI. The agency has established no
procedures for identifying disparate effects on low-
income communities of color, he said. Each of the
agencies that make up the organization is required
to file its own Title VI report, he stated, but there is

no coordination among the agencies on the issue.
The reports, he charged, are "completely vague" and
are designed to create an impression that there is
equity how the transit systems operate. Other
problems in NewYork City that should be addressed
include waste transfer stations and access to
parklands, he explained, but those issues receive
little attention from EPA Region 2. Mr. Freilla urged
that the NEJAC advise Region 2 to improve its
regulatory performance.

Ms. Miller-Travis suggested that Mr. Freilla
reexamine the New York City Environmental Justice
Alliance's research framework, stating that it is not
only low-income communities of color that are
affected by the placement of facilities, but all
communities of color.

3.9 Mildred McClain, Citizens for Environmental
Justice, Savannah, Georgia

Representing the People of Color and
Disenfranchised Communities Environmental Health
Network, Dr. Mildred McClain, Citizens for
Environmental Justice, Savannah, Georgia,
reminded the members of the Executive Council that
she had spoken at the previous meeting of the
NEJAC in December 1999 about Federal facilities.
Environmental justice, she stated, calls for universal
protection from nuclear testing and extraction,
production, and disposal oftoxicwastes and poisons
that threaten the fundamental right to clean air, land,
water, and food. Environmental justice demands an
end to the production of toxins, hazardous waste,
and radioactive materials, she continued, and all
producers must be held strictly accountable for
remediation. Workers have the right to a safe and
healthy work environment without being forced to
choose between an unsafe livelihood and
unemployment, she added. Dr. McClain stated that
victims of environmental injustice have the right to
receive full compensation and reparations for
damages, as well as quality health care.

Dr. McClain explained that there are African-
Americans at the Savannah River site, one of 165
Federal facilities that must be cleaned up, who have
been exposed excessively to contamination and are
being denied the right to health care. She stated
further that DOE had held a workers hearing at the
Los Alamos National Laboratory that was attended
by more than 400 people who had been exposed to
contamination. Workers claimed that records had
been falsified to cover up exposures at the facility.
DoD and DOE should help to formulate policy, she
declared.

Atlanta, Georgia, May23 and 24, 2000

2-15


-------
Public Comment Periods

National Environmental Justice Advisory Council

Continuing, Dr. McClain stated that, to ensure that
risk assessments are meaningful, the community
should be involved from the initial stages and those
performing the assessment should have an
understanding of the health background of the
community. Dr. McClain called upon the NEJAC to
establish a subcommittee to address environmental
justice issues at Federal facilities.

Mr. Lee stated that the Health and Research
Subcommittee would serve as the point of contact
for the NEJAC for issues related to Federal facilities
and that OEJ will work with EPA's Federal Facilities
Enforcement Office (FFEO) to follow-up on issues at
facilities identified during public comment periods, he
said. Federal facility issues fall within the
responsibilities of several branches of EPA, he
explained; it is necessary to coordinate plans with
those offices before a working group or
subcommittee is established.

Dr. McClain asked the Executive Council how
community-based organizations can help to
influence matters related to the issues that the
NEJAC addresses at its sessions. Issues related to
Federal facilities are discussed continually, she said,
and it is made clear that the Health and Research
Subcommittee is the point of contact, but people do
not know how to influence what that subcommittee
does and discusses during its meeting session. Ms.
Shepard responded that such organizations as Dr.
McClain's are influencing the process and that the
Executive Council considers all the information it
hears. Mr. Barry Hill, Director, EPA OEJ, noted that
the commenters have been heard by the NEJAC and
by EPA, and that the NEJAC will address the Federal
facility issue.

Mr. Turrentine stated that the NEJAC takes under
advisement all information it hears. He stated that it
would be unfair to ask Mr. Lee or Mr. Hill to make a
commitment about the formation of a Federal
facilities subcommittee before they have the
opportunity to speak with representatives of the
various program offices within EPA that have an
interest in Federal facilities.

3.10 Beverly Wright, Wampanoag Tribe of Gay
Head, Aquinnah, Massachusetts

Ms. Beverly Wright, Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head,
Aquinnah, Massachusetts, informed the Executive
Council that her tribe lives on Martha's Vineyard
Island and has been Federally recognized since
1987. She explained that, with Federal recognition,
the tribe had received money for education and
health services and protection of natural resources.
Between 1940 and 1994, she continued, the U.S.

Department of the Navy (Navy) conducted bombing
practices on the Island of Normans Land located five
miles off the coast of Martha's Vineyard. When the
Navy decided it no longer wanted the island, she
said, the tribe applied for access to it, but that
access was denied because the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (FWS), DOI, wanted to use the
island as a refuge. Ms. Wright pointed out that,
under the Indian policy of the FWS, Native
Americans are not to be denied access to their
traditional homelands.

Last year, continued Ms. Wright, the state of
Massachusetts performed a cancer study that
indicated that residents of the reservation had a 93
percent higher cancer rate than other residents of
Massachusetts. She stated that she would like to
reassess the island, noting that she cannot prove
that contamination on the island causes cancer, but
stating she would like to determine whether that is
the case. She asked the NEJAC for assistance in
nominating the Island of Nomans Land for a grant
under CERCLA. She added that the reservation is
building a fish hatchery to spawn a variety of
species, noting that production of seafood is the
basis of the tribe's economy. Contamination of the
water, she explained, would create "a vicious cycle
of cancer." Ms. Wright urged that the NEJAC help
the tribe obtain funding, which is available because
it is a Federally recognized tribe, to support a cancer
study.

Ms. Miller-Travis noted that Ms. Wright would be
attending the meeting of the Waste and Facility
Siting Subcommittee to discuss how the NEJAC can
provide assistance in resolving the issues Ms.
Wright had raised. Ms. Miller-Travis stated that Mr.
Timothy Fields, Jr., Assistant Administrator of EPA
OSWER, who has responsibility for oversight of the
implementation of CERCLA, would be present at that
meeting, as well. Mr. Goldtooth mentioned that the
Indigenous Peoples Subcommittee would be
interested in working with the Waste and Facility
Siting Subcommittee to ensure that the issue is
pursued.

3.11 Grace Hewell, Health Policy Group,
Chattanooga, Tennessee

Dr. Grace Hewell, Health Policy Group,
Chattanooga, Tennessee, expressed her interest in
learning how she can help the NEJAC solve civil
rights issues. She stated that she has a variety of
degrees in public health and social work and noted
that much of the discussion during the meeting of
the NEJAC had focused on community health. Dr.
Hewell said that she had performed public health

2-16

Atlanta, Georgia, May 23 and 24, 2000


-------
National Environmental Justice Advisory Council

Public Comment Periods

work in many areas of the country, including Queens
and Harlem, New York.

Dr. Hewell expressed her disappointment that the
NEJAC has not yet accepted her long-standing
invitation to hold a meeting in Chattanooga,
Tennessee. She also requested that the NEJAC
provide environmental health education in
Chattanooga, since few people in that area are
knowledgeable about that subject. Dr. Hewell then
stated that people must be educated about
environmental justice. With today's technology, she
added, people must be given access to information.
Mr. Cole stated that, in 1996, Dr. Hewell had
requested that the NEJAC hold a meeting in
Chattanooga. In 1997, he continued, the NEJAC
passed a resolution to meet in Chattanooga, but a
transition in leadership at OEJ had brought the
NEJAC to Atlanta, Georgia, instead. Mr. Cole
apologized to Dr. Hewell for the NEJAC's failure to
schedule a meeting in Chattanooga.

3.12 Sandra Jaribu Hill, CenterforConstitutional
Rights, Greenville, Mississippi

Speaking on behalf of the Mississippi Workers
Center, Ms. Sandra Jaribu Hill, Center for
Constitutional Rights, Greenville, Mississippi,
informed the Executive Council that she would
discuss an issue that, she declared, has not yet been
addressed adequately by government agencies.
That issue, she said, is "dying to make a living."
Every year, continued Ms. Hill, numerous workers in
the United States are killed as a result of hazards in
the workplace. She explained that, while some of
those workers were victims of fatal accidents, many
were poisoned by toxic substances. Segregated
workplaces are found throughout the country, she
pointed out, especially in the southern region, where
workers of color often are assigned the dirtiest, most
dangerous jobs.

Ms. Hill recounted a story about a man who worked
at a Tyson Foods, Inc. poultry plant. When the
worker, who used chlorine to clean processing
machines, became sick and approached his
supervisor, said Ms. Hill, the worker was told to quit
if he did not like the work. The worker contacted the
Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA), which performed an on-site inspection. The
worker later was fired, continued Ms. Hill. She
added that, because of health problems that arose
while he was working at the Tyson plant, the man
involved currently is unable to work a steady job.

Ms. Hill then described another incident that
occurred in 1992, when 25 workers were killed after
a boiler exploded at a poultry plant located in

Hamlet, North Carolina. The fire doors had been
locked to prevent workers from stealing chickens,
she pointed out. When officials of the Food and
Drug Administration (FDA), U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services (HHS), inspected the
plant before the accident occurred, workers had told
them about the unsafe work conditions. The
officials, however, were concerned only about the
cleanliness of the plant, she said.

Ms. Hill recommended that the NEJAC facilitate the
establishment of an EPA and OSHA task force to
address the chemical poisoning of workers and
environmental racism. Ms. Ramos stated that
community leaders should be encouraged to file
complaints with OSHA on behalf of mistreated
employees. Ms. Hill responded that her community
had filed complaints with OSHA, adding that workers
do not have the right to sue an employer for
compensation for injuries. In response to Ms.
Augustine's question, whether Ms. Hill's organization
works with welfare workers trained to work in
hazardous conditions, Ms. Hill responded that the
welfare workers are forced to work in toxic conditions
without any hazardous waste training.

Ms. Augustine asked Mr. Turrentine whether, as an
environmental issue, OSHA's failure to protect
workers would fall under the jurisdiction of the U.S.
Department of Labor (DOL). Ms. Hill responded that
it would seem that the proper agencies with which to
collaborate on the issue are EPA and OSHA, since
they both acknowledge hazards that affect workers.
Mr. Tseming Yang, Vermont Law School and
member of the International Subcommittee of the
NEJAC, noted that such issues are related to
matters that were to be discussed during the
meeting of the International Subcommittee; he
therefore invited Ms. Hill to attend that meeting. Mr.
Yang asked Ms. Hill whether the problem is lack of
enforcement, lack of adequate laws, or lack of
employee education. Ms. Hill responded that OSHA
does not cover farm workers or domestic workers
who work with dangerous cleaning materials. The
number of OSHA inspectors is insufficient to assess
sites, she stated, and enforcement is an issue, as
well. Mr. Turrentine suggested that Ms. Hill join
forces with a local or national labor union that has
resources and capital to invest. Ms. Hill stated that
her organization had been working with unions, but
that government accountability is needed to protect
workers.

Atlanta, Georgia, May23 and 24, 2000

2-17


-------
Public Comment Periods

National Environmental Justice Advisory Council

3.13	James Hill, Scarboro Community
Environmental Justice Network, Oak Ridge,
Tennessee

Stating the he is president of the Oak Ridge Branch
of the National Association for the Advancement of
Colored People (NAACP), Mr. James Hill, Scarboro
Community Environmental Justice Network, Oak
Ridge, Tennessee, noted that the predominantly
African-American community of Scarboro is located
500 yards from the Y-12 nuclear weapons plant.
The state of Tennessee was called upon to
investigate why so many children in the community
were suffering from health problems, he stated, but
that the state of Tennessee refused to take action.
For the past two years, the Scarboro Community
Environmental Justice Network has been meeting
with local, state, and Federal officials to establish
leadership in the community and to conduct health
examinations, he said. The results of those
examinations indicate that asthma rates are higher
than the national average, he pointed out. The
community currently is discussing with DOE the
performance of additional soil sampling, since an
initial sampling showed high levels of contamination
in the community, he said. In addition, Mr. Hill
continued, EPA had presented a sample plan to the
community and provided the community an
opportunity to comment on the plan. Mr. Hill stated
that he wished to inform the NEJAC that many
activities were underway in Scarboro, but that "there
is no closure yet."

3.14	Mildred Colen, Private Citizen, Warren,
Arkansas

Ms. Mildred Colen, a private citizen, Warren,
Arkansas, stated that there are five lumber
companies located in Warren, one of which is
located adjacent to the residences of many families
in the community. She explained that many people
in the community had died of cancer, cardiovascular
disease, or diabetes because they used water from
contaminated wells. She pointed out that city water
was not available to the community until the 1970s.
For more than three decades, the lumber industry
discharged and dumped its wastes on residents'
property, she said. Recent sampling by EPA
revealed the presence of 15 heavy metals in soil,
including arsenic at a level of 17.2 parts per million,
she said, pointing out that the maximum
contamination limit is 0.05 parts per million. Other
testing revealed the presence of nine volatile organic
chemicals that are identical to chemicals used by the
hardwood industry in the manufacturing of its
products, she stated. The chemicals are known to
cause cancer, kidney and liver problems, and

circulatory disorders, she said, but EPA tells the
community there is no need for concern.

The Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality
(ADEQ), EPA, ATSDR, and the Arkansas
Department of Health are all aware that there is an
illegal landfill created by the industry in the
community, Ms. Colen said. Runoff from the landfill
flows from a stream onto the properties of residents
of the community, she stated. She stated that an
investigator had examined the landfill after she had
offered comments at an environmental justice
enforcement roundtable meeting of the NEJAC in
San Antonio, Texas in 1996. After the examination
of the landfill in her neighborhood, she continued,
and of another landfill in a white neighborhood,
cleanup of the landfill in the white neighborhood was
ordered within weeks.

Ms. Colen added that she since had filed two
administrative complaints with EPA's OCR under
Title VI. She noted that those charges were against
the city of Warren for participating in the pollution of
the neighborhood and ADEQ for issuing a permit
under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) that authorized industry to
discharge effluent onto private property without
monitoring. Not only were the complaints denied,
she said, but OCR also violated her privacy rights by
turning the complaints over to the agencies against
which she had filed them. Since then, she stated,
she had experienced several forms of harassment.
Ms. Colen asked the members of the Executive
Council for any advice they could provide about her
predicament.

Dr. Michel Gelobter, Rutgers University and chair of
the Air and Water Subcommittee of the NEJAC,
asked Ms. Colen what role EPA Region 6 had played
during the proceedings she had described. Ms.
Colen responded that representatives of Region 6
had visited her community several times to
investigate conditions, but that no action had
resulted from those visits. Dr. Gelobter suggested
that Ms. Colen speak with him after the public
comment session to determine how the Air and
Water Subcommittee of the NEJAC can be of
assistance to her community.

3.15 Caitlin Waddick, City Planning Program,
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta,
Georgia

Speaking on behalf of her professor, Ms. Caitlin
Waddick, City Planning Program, Georgia Institute of
Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, introduced to the
members of the Executive Council that program's
research on multiple chemical sensitivity. She noted

2-18

Atlanta, Georgia, May 23 and 24, 2000


-------
National Environmental Justice Advisory Council

Public Comment Periods

that the Enforcement Subcommittee of the NEJAC
had prepared a draft resolution on multiple chemical
sensitivity that requested that EPA review a host of
issues. Ms. Waddick stated that representatives of
the university's city planning program had reviewed
the resolution and suggested that Item 7 of the
proposed resolution be amended to read as follows,
"The EPA should devise and adopt a reasonable
accommodation policy for affected persons who
work and/or attend meetings held at or sponsored by
the EPA. This should include the identification and
provision of EPA work places and EPA meeting
places which are non-toxic and suitable, a fragrance-
free policy for EPA offices in internal and external
meetings, and other actions to accommodate
multiple chemical sensitivity, disabled workers, and
meeting participants." (Appendix A of this meeting
summary provides the full text of the resolution that
was approved by the Executive Council on May 26,
2000.) For example, she stated, several people had
been unable to attend the public comment period
because the room was not fragrance-free.

Ms. Waddick stated that studies indicate that
multiple chemical sensitivity in the United States
could affect from 16 to 32 percent of the population.
Such persons are so sensitive to chemicals that the
condition is very disruptive in their lives, she said.
Ms. Waddick stressed the importance of passing the
resolution on multiple chemical sensitivity. Action
should be taken now, she said, to prevent more
individuals from becoming sensitized to chemicals.
She explained that people can become sensitized by
exposure to pesticides, indoor air pollutants, and
new carpeting, forexample. Mr. Cole stated that Ms.
Waddick should give any recommended changes in
the resolution to him, so that the members of the
Enforcement Subcommittee can discuss those
changes during their meeting.

3.16 Pat Hartman, Concerned Citizens of
Mossville, Westlake, Louisiana

Ms. Pat Hartman, Concerned Citizens of Mossville,
Westlake, Louisiana, stated that, a few years earlier,
the city of Mossville had experienced a toxic spill that
caused several illnesses and deaths among
members of the community. The people of Mossville
filed a class action lawsuit, she said, but she
characterized the settlement reached as unfair. In
addition, there are refineries throughout the
community that contaminate the land, air, and water,
she said. State and Federal agencies have not
provided any assistance, she stated. Many people
in the community continue to be sick, she explained,
from cancer and other illnesses resulting from the
spill. Ms. Hartman asked that the NEJAC help the
people of Mossville in their effort to have a health

clinic established in their community. Doctors do not
understand that the illnesses are caused by
chemical contamination, and they prescribe
medication that is unaffordable, she explained. Ms.
Hartman noted that the community has united with
other minority communities in Louisiana and around
the country to address the environmental injustices
that occur in their respective communities. Ms.
Shepard stated that residents of Mossville were to
meet with members of the Health and Research and
Waste and Facility Siting subcommittees to discuss
the issues further on the following day.

3.17	Pat Costner, GreenPeace International,
Eureka Springs, Arkansas

Dr. Pat Costner, GreenPeace International, Eureka
Springs, Arkansas, introduced Mr. Damu Smith,
GreenPeace International, Washington, D.C., and
stated that Mr. Smith would present the opening
comments of her presentation. Mr. Smith reminded
the Executive Council that, at the December 1999
meeting of the NEJAC, he had discussed an
investigation of dioxin exposure that ATSDR had
conducted in Mossville. ATSDR had completed that
investigation, he said, adding that Dr. Costner would
provide a critique of the scientific evidence related to
the dioxin crisis.

Dr. Costner stated that the 28 people who were
tested in Mossville during the investigation had levels
of dioxin and PCBs in their blood at three times the
background level for the population of the United
States. Those levels fall within the range at which
adverse health effects have been identified in both
laboratory animals and humans, she said. That
finding suggests that there are unique local sources
of dioxin and PCBs in Mossville, she added. ATSDR
also analyzed a sample of breast milk that contained
levels of dioxin and PCB that were 30 percent higher
than average, she pointed out. In addition, she said,
dioxin levels in soil in people's yards in Mossville are
17 times higher than levels found in rural areas of
the United States. On the basis of those findings,
she continued, the citizens of Mossville recommend
that the NEJAC make it a priority to identify and
eliminate the source of contamination of dioxin and
PCBs in Mossville. Not only must the facilities be
dealt with, she declared, but the dumps and landfills
also must be remediated.

3.18	Charlotte Keys, Jesus People Against
Pollution, Columbia, Mississippi

Stating that she has personal experience with local
public health issues arising from exposure to
contamination, Ms. Charlotte Keys, Jesus People
Against Pollution, Columbia, Mississippi, stated that

Atlanta, Georgia, May23 and 24, 2000

2-19


-------
Public Comment Periods

National Environmental Justice Advisory Council

the only true remedy for many such issues is to bring
all agency resources together. She pointed out that
sites being remediated under the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and
Superfund, Federal facilities, pesticide sites, and
similar sites often are the source of the same public
concerns. Most of the sicknesses in minority
communities result from environmental pollution, not
poverty, she noted. Ms. Keys recommended that the
NEJAC work to enact or enforce existing policies to
make it mandatory for agencies to foster
partnerships with communities to develop corrective
measures through a joint effort involving all agency
resources. DoD, DOE, HUD, HHS, the U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), EPA, and
other agencies should resolve public health issues
through the use of existing funds and develop new
funds so that communities can receive health care
services, she said. In addition, she continued,
medical professionals should undergo training in the
effects of toxic contaminants on health so that they
can make accurate diagnoses of illnesses related to
exposure to contamination.

3.19 Ian Zabarte, Western Shoshone National
Council, Indian Springs, Nevada

Mr. Ian Zabarte, Western Shoshone National
Council, Indian Springs, Nevada, stated that
environmental racism in policy practiced by agencies
of the government, such as the U.S. Department of
Justice (DOJ) and EPA, is killing the Western
Shoshone people. The Western Shoshone have
filed documents in U.S. courts that present an
analysis and critique of Federal plenary power over
Indians, he said. The doctrine of U.S. Federal
trusteeship that is asserted over American Indians
originated in an era of racial discrimination, he
explained, and is unacceptable in modern society.
The Federal government asserts that it has plenary
power and trusteeship over the Western Shoshone,
he said. From the government's perspective, he
said, such a position means that the government can
exert unlimited administrative control over the
Western Shoshone people and their property. The
policy destroys the Western Shoshone language,
culture, and tradition, he pointed out. The Federal
government maintains that Western Shoshone
territory was taken, and that money has
compensated them for such taking, but at no time
have the Western Shoshone relinquished title to their
lands, he added. Further, they have refused
payment for claims on their territory, said Mr.
Zabarte. The foundation cases of U.S. Federal
Indian law are grounded on principles of supremacy
that date back to the 15th century, he stated. Mr.
Zabarte pointed out that the cases that the United
States uses to justify its policies are based on
distinctions between Christians and heathens that

penalized Indians for not believing in Christianity.
Today, that unjust posture of Christian right
continues to influence the government's dealings
with Native Americans, he stated, and is used to
justify the ongoing theft of land and natural
resources.

Mr. Zabarte noted that the United States has
detonated 924 nuclear weapons within Shoshone
territory and buried 828 such weapons underground.
Radiation is entering the groundwater, he said.
Native Americans also have been targeted for a
proposed high-level nuclear waste repository at
Yucca Mountain, Nevada, he added. Mr. Zabarte
stated that Native American communities have
compiled research to deal with such problems and
representatives of those communities were to
present that research at the meeting of the
International Subcommittee.

3.20	Michelle Xenos, Shundahai Network, Las
Vegas, Nevada

Ms. Xenos explained that the definition of health
discussed during the public comment periods had
excluded mental and spiritual health. Mental and
spiritual health are equally important, she pointed
out, and manifest physical health. People are linked
with other people and their environment, she
continued; what happens to one person affects other
people, as well. Ms. Xenos noted that the people of
her community believe there are flaws in the
methodologies used in the conduct of health studies
and that people have difficulty accepting the way the
results of such studies are interpreted. She stated
that a profit-driven society will not be healthy,
because profit is generated through exploitation of
the earth. Not only is the environment exploited, she
continued, but Native Americans and African-
Americans also are mistreated. Ms. Xenos stated in
conclusion that EPA and the NEJAC should protect
the resources that create profit.

3.21	David Baker, Community Against Pollution,
Anniston, Alabama

Thanking the NEJAC for visiting Anniston on its fact-
finding tour the day before, Mr. David Baker,
Community Against Pollution, Anniston, Alabama,
stated that three and one-half million tons of PCBs
currently are buried in the neighborhood of Anniston,
Alabama. A number of industries have assaulted
that city, he said. The community has been working
with EPA, he continued, and the results to date had
been satisfactory. Mr. Baker stated that, on the
preceding day, a judge in one of the litigation cases
had informed Monsanto Company that the
corporation must alleviate the contamination in
Anniston, he stated. Yet, three and one-half million

2-20

Atlanta, Georgia, May 23 and 24, 2000


-------
National Environmental Justice Advisory Council

Public Comment Periods

tons of PCBs remain buried in the community, he
reiterated. The community requested that EPA
relocate people or remove the mountain of PCBs, he
stated. Mr. Baker asked for the assistance of the
NEJAC in addressing the issue, adding that the
community also needs assistance in arranging the
establishment of a health clinic.

3.22	Natalie Leverette, PEACE, Richton,
Mississippi

Ms. Natalie Leverette, PEACE, Richton, Mississippi,
stated that all the households in her predominantly
black community experience some type of health
problem. Members of the community had requested
information from DOE about the chemical
companies in the community, believing that those
facilities could be causing the health problems, she
explained. The community discovered that wells in
their neighborhoods were contaminated with high
levels of chloride, sodium, strontium, and boron, she
said. Members of the community reviewed some
water reports of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS),
DOI, she continued, and discovered that their wells
consistently showed high levels of contamination
year after year, while wells in nearby neighborhoods
did not show any contamination. The chemical
companies and DOE both deny any involvement in
the contamination of their community, she stated.

Ms. Leverette mentioned that the community also
had discovered that their water supply comes from
a separate system from that supplying other
communities nearby. In 1993, she continued, the
community learned that there were traces of arsenic
in the water, but the state environmental department
of Mississippi denied that finding, she said. The
contaminated well recently had been sealed, she
stated. Ms. Leverette requested that the NEJAC
arrange for EPA to help the community test the
sealed well to identify contaminants its citizens have
been exposed to. In addition, she said, the
community needs health facilities to address the
medical problems of its people.

3.23	Nan Freeland, Natural Resources
Leadership Institute, Raleigh, North
Carolina

Ms. Nan Freeland, Natural Resources Leadership
Institute, Raleigh, North Carolina, expressed concern
about fish consumption advisories and how they are
related to environmental justice. In North Carolina,
she stated, fish consumption advisories rarely are
posted in areas in which poor people and African-
Americans will see them. Advisories typically are
posted in areas to which people who have fishing
boats go, she explained, but rarely in areas in which

people fish without boats. Children often play in the
water, as well, she stated, adding that fish advisories
sometimes are not posted until after dead fish have
been found. Streams and tributaries affected by
advisories often run through communities, she
pointed out, but the advisories are not placed in
communities in which people work and live. North
Carolina has had a significant problem with pollution
of streams and rivers, she stated, and it is important
that fish consumption advisories be posted. Fish are
dying and disappearing in places in which they once
were plentiful, she said. Ms. Freeland stated that,
when fish consumption advisories are issued, they
should be highly publicized, not merely posted in
recreational areas. Citizens also should be educated
about what fish advisories mean, she said. Dr.
Gelobter pointed out that Ms. Freeland was to attend
the meeting of the Air and Water Subcommittee on
the following day. He added that such issues are
relevant in Indian country, as well.

3.24 Connie Tucker, Southern Organizing
Committee for Economic and Social
Justice, Atlanta, Georgia

Ms. Connie Tucker, Southern Organizing Committee
for Economic and Social Justice, Atlanta, Georgia,
explained that on May 5 and 6, 2000,
representatives of 15 communities in EPA Region 4
attended a citizens training forum. The goals of the
forum were to educate citizens about the structure of
the NEJAC, discuss public health issues that affect
low-income and minority communities, and discuss
recommendations related to policy for addressing
public health issues, she said. The forum focused
on a community-based public health model to elicit
the views of representatives of affected
communities, she stated. A planning committee
subsequently was formed to identify major issues
and policy recommendations gathered during the
forum, she said. The major issues identified, she
pointed out, were children's health, air and water
pollution, Superfund and brownfields sites, Federal
facilities, and commercial agriculture. The planning
committee is preparing a document that sets forth
policy recommendations on assessment,
intervention, and prevention. The document will be
presented to the NEJAC when it is completed, she
stated.

Ms. Tucker suggested to the Executive Council that
each region that hosts a meeting of the NEJAC
should provide funding for environmental justice
organizations to conduct similar forums so that those
organizations can present a list of recommendations
to the NEJAC before the meeting begins. She
added that EPA should provide adequate funding to
foster community participation and allow

Atlanta, Georgia, May23 and 24, 2000

2-21


-------
Public Comment Periods

National Environmental Justice Advisory Council

communities to obtain technical assistance. Ms.
Tucker also stated that the NEJAC should develop
a process for reviewing and adopting
recommendations provided during public comment
periods. Concluding her statement, she requested
that the NEJAC begin to concentrate on the failure of
EPA to provide oversight of enforcement and
compliance responsibilities delegated to states.

3.25	Edgar Moss, Mcintosh Environmental
Justice Taskforce, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia

Noting that he was a retired worker for Ciba-Geigy
Chemical Corporation, Mr. Edgar Moss, Mcintosh
Environmental Justice Taskforce, Inc., Atlanta,
Georgia, stated that the African-American
community of Mcintosh is located onthefenceline of
facilities of the Ciba-Geigy and Olin Corporation
Chemical Divisions. Ciba-Geigy produces pesticides
that cause cancer and developmental problems in
children, he explained. He pointed out that the
companies contaminated the basin of the
Tombigbee river, creating a Superfund site. Mr.
Moss indicated that the rates of cancer and other
illnesses are high among workers in the community,
and children suffer from learning disabilities. He
pointed out that no state or Federal agencies have
intervened or provided help to the community. Mr.
Moss requested that the NEJAC intervene and
investigate the need for relocation in Mcintosh.

3.26	Usha Little, Native American Environmental
Protection Coalition, Valley Center,
California

Noting that some of her colleagues had spoken
previously about the Gregory Canyon Landfill, Ms.
Usha Little, Native American Environmental
Protection Coalition, Valley Center, California,
informed the Executive Council that the proposed
landfill would cover 1,770 acres of canyon land, part
of which is the watershed of the San Luis Rey River,
which replenishes groundwater sources in southern
California. The habitat includes a diverse population
of native plants and animals, she stated, and the
area is adjacent to the lands of six Indian tribes. The
landfill site would have a significant effect on the
livelihood of a minority population whose voices are
unheard, and whose resources are already limited,
she explained.

The site proposed for the Gregory Canyon Landfill is
Medicine Mountain, which is a Native American
place of worship, she stated. Medicine Rock, a
location on the mountain, has been a part of Indian
culture through many generations, she said, adding
that it is a place where Native Americans can
connect with their ancestors' religious and spiritual

knowledge. There are 22 prehistoric and historic
sites on the mountain, Ms. Little added, and three
types of vegetation present there are listed in the
California Environmental Quality Act. She pointed
out that traffic will increase significantly, and air
pollution will affect six reservations. Ms. Little
requested that the NEJAC contact and advise the
agencies responsible for issuing the landfill permit.
She closed her statement by reiterating that the
Gregory Canyon Landfill is an environmental and
cultural disaster, and is a desecration in the eyes of
Native American people. Ms. Little submitted a
videotape to the NEJAC that documented comments
from tribal leaders and community members who
had been unable to attend the meeting. Mr.
Goldtooth noted that the Waste and Facility Siting
and the Indigenous Peoples subcommittees would
follow-up on the issue.

3.27	Hazel Johnson, People for Community
Recovery, Chicago, Illinois

Pointing out that she is a former member of the
NEJAC, Ms. Hazel Johnson, People for Community
Recovery, Chicago, Illinois, stated that her
community is affected by heavy toxic contamination.
Instead of asking the state or the health department
to perform a health study, Ms. Johnson said, she is
requesting that the NEJAC help train residents to
conduct their own health study. Residents then
would not be concerned about being misled by the
government, Ms. Johnson explained.

After PCBs were discovered in the community, its
citizens filed a class action lawsuit against the public
housing authority because the authority had
neglected to inform residents of the toxic living
conditions before they moved in, she said. Several
people in the community are dying of a variety of
illnesses, she explained, and health care is too
expensive for residents of the community to afford.
Similar problems are occurring around the country,
she stated, and it is time that agencies take action.
Ms. Johnson also requested that the NEJAC help
provide training for medical personnel because they
are not skilled in diagnosing illnesses caused by
toxic contamination.

3.28	Mark Mitchell, Connecticut Coalition for
Environmental Justice, Hartford,
Connecticut

Mr. Mitchell stated that his organization had
performed some community-based, community-
driven research on contamination in Hartford,
Connecticut. Hartford has the highest documented
rate of asthma in the United States, as demonstrated
by a study conducted by the Connecticut Children's

2-22

Atlanta, Georgia, May 23 and 24, 2000


-------
National Environmental Justice Advisory Council

Public Comment Periods

Medical Center that indicated that 41 percent of the
city's children have asthma, he said. Mr. Mitchell
pointed out that it is important to examine the high
rates of asthma and the relationship of such rates to
air toxins. Trash and sewage sludge in the
community account for2,000 tons of airtoxins ayear
that are not reported to the TRI, he stated.

Mr. Mitchell informed the Executive Council that his
organization had documented a new kind of medical
condition called chronic recurrent respiratory ailment
that occurs in Hartford and other urban areas around
the country. Such respiratory illnesses, he
explained, have symptoms similar to those of minor
colds and last several months. Studies show that
the incidence of the condition is not distributed
evenly through the city, he said, adding that it is
concentrated in areas in which rates of air pollution
are higherthan those in areas in which the incidence
is relatively low.

Mr. Mitchell stated that asthma is a two-step process
that involves an initiator and a promoter. Toxins are
the initiators, he explained, and other air pollutants,
such as allergens or dust mites, are promoters of
asthma, once it has developed. Mr. Mitchell stated
that hormonal mimics, such as PCBs and dioxins,
should be studied because they may cause allergies
and autoimmune conditions. Mr. Mitchell stated that
community-based organizations should be
represented on NEJAC subcommittees. He added
that people should be tested to determine whether
there is a relationship between the increase in
chemical contaminants and the increases in disease
rates. Such testing should focus on health
outcomes, ratherthan engineering controls, he said,
and diseases related to environmental conditions
must be addressed.

3.29 MaVynee Oshun Betsch, A.L. Lewis
Historical Society, American Beach, Florida

Ms. Betsch informed the Executive Council that
there are three dump sites in Jacksonville, Florida
that should be addressed by EPA. Representatives
of Jacksonville had been unable to attend the
meeting, she stated, but the information they wished
to bring to the attention of the NEJAC had been
provided to the Executive Council.

Continuing, Ms. Betsch stated that she is a survivor
of environmental injustice. She then recommended
that the NEJAC form a work group of people who
have survived such injustice. She stated that she
once lived in London, England where the air pollution
caused by coal-fired plants was so heavy that she
had found it necessary to wear surgical masks. Ms.
Betsch explained that she lives a very healthy

lifestyle, even though she has colon cancer. She
pointed out that illnesses caused by contamination
can be treated with the right diet and medications.
People should listen to folklore, she stated, because
there is a chance that folk remedies can cure their
ailments. She pointed out that understanding the
culture of a community and talking to members of
communities on their level will enhance the ability to
treat their ailments.

3.30	Damu Imara Smith, GreenPeace,
International, Washington, D.C.

Mr. Smith discussed environmental justice issues
affecting the community of Mossville, Louisiana that
were to be addressed during the scheduled joint
meeting of the Waste and Facility Siting
Subcommittee and the Health and Research
Subcommittee. He noted that, while the meeting
would focus on the health and dioxin crisis in
Mossville, he also wanted the NEJAC to examine the
policy implications of the government's dealings with
the community. It is important to examine
Mossville's situation to determine how other
communities insimilarcircumstances would be dealt
with, he stated. Mr. Smith noted that his
organization would demonstrate the seriousness of
the dioxin crisis in Mossville and discuss the
responses of state and Federal agencies. State and
Federal agencies have taken a series of actions to
frustrate the communities' efforts to obtain
environmental justice and to undermine the work of
Mossville Environmental Action Now, the
organization that has been mobilizing the community
for three years, he stated. Mr. Smith requested that
the Executive Council provide advice on the most
effective way to follow-up health studies. In addition,
he continued, the communities would like to address
the proper role of Federal agencies in cases in which
state agencies fail to act.

3.31	Elizabeth Crowe, Chemical Weapons
Working Group, Berea, Kentucky

Noting that there were some points that had been
missed in discussions of community-based health
assessments, Ms. Crowe pointed out that there had
been no mention of alternative assessment in
discussions of shifting the burden of proof to industry
and the military. A justice-based, community-based
health assessment is not feasible until EPA and
other agencies stop presuming that industries are
innocent until proven guilty, she stated. It should be
assumed that chemicals are harmful, she explained,
until industry can prove otherwise. A precautionary
principle states that, when science cannot fill data
gaps, even because of a lack of evidence, it is
imperative to err on the side of precaution and public

Atlanta, Georgia, May23 and 24, 2000

2-23


-------
Public Comment Periods

National Environmental Justice Advisory Council

health, she said. A protective model linked with a
precautionary principle is the alternative assessment
that, if implemented, dictates that, if an action is too
dangerous it will be unacceptable from a public
health standpoint, she explained. Lacking such an
assessment, she continued, EPA provides little
incentive for the development and use of cleaner
technologies. Ms. Crowe then stated that, in the
case of the issue of community health assessment,
the burden of proof continues to be placed on
communities like Mossville. The people of such
communities are the people who are dying, she
declared, and they should not be expected to prove
that they are being harmed.

3.32	Jim MacDonald, Pittsburg (California)
Unified School District, Pittsburg, California

Mr. MacDonald stated that EPA has made many
decisions that make environmental justice
impossible. Industry can bypass most of the
programs instituted by EPA simply by saying that it
is not creating adverse effects, he explained. The
argument about cause and effect can go on for
years, he said. EPA must recognize that
environmental justice is a civil rights matter, he
stated, and that everyone has the rightto breathe the
same quality air. The placement of industry in
African-American neighborhoods is brought about by
the same mechanism that caused the segregation of
public education, he said. Zoning practices arose
from racism and discrimination, he stated.

Mr. MacDonald pointed out that a minority of people
"run this country" because so many individuals
choose not to vote. City councils have more control
than most people understand, he said. It is
important that communities understand their city
council, because those bodies often are controlled
by big business and commercial interests, he stated.
Mr. MacDonald suggested that, before voting for
politicians, people should ask those politicians
whether they intend to support new industries or
sources of pollution if they are elected.

3.33	Donnel Wilkins, Detroiters Working for
Environmental Justice, Detroit, Michigan

Noting that EPA's mission ensures the protection of
health, Ms. Donnel Wilkins, Detroiters Working for
Environmental Justice, Detroit, Michigan, recounted
the story of a 15-year-old girl who died of an asthma
attack. A common-sense approach must be taken
to address the health effects on communities and
the issues of concern to those communities, she
said. She suggested that a remedial education
project should be developed that includes
representatives of local, state, and Federal agencies,

and of communities, as well. There is an
assumption, she continued, that communities do not
understand the issues they face, and there is
disregard for the knowledge members of
communities possess. Existing laws should be
enforced, and health must be placed first in
importance, she stated. Also needed is a reversal in
the trend that places the burden on communities to
prove that health disparities exist, she added.

Ms. Wilkins discussed a recent battle against a
hospital in her community that had a medical waste
incinerator that was not in compliance with
applicable regulations. The community learned that
rates of asthma were higher in areas adjacent to the
facility, and it was successful in shutting down the
facility, she explained. Before that was done, she
stated, the community was required to prove that the
health problems of its members were linked to
emissions from the incinerator. Ms. Wilkins pointed
out that the answers to some environmental
problems exist, but more interaction among
agencies and sharing of resources are necessary to
effectively implement such solutions. She noted as
well the need for a better understanding of
cumulative effects and the health risks they pose.

2-24

Atlanta, Georgia, May 23 and 24, 2000


-------
National Environmental Justice Advisory Council

Public Comment Periods

CHAPTER TWO

SUMMARY OF THE

PUBLIC COMMENT PERIODS	2-1

1.0 INTRODUCTION 	2-1

2.0 GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD HELD ON MAY 23, 2000 	 2-1

2.1	Elizabeth Crowe, Chemical Weapons Working Group, Berea, Kentucky 	2-1

2.2	James Friloux, Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality, Baton Rouge, Louisiana

	2-2

2.3	Farella Esta Robinson, United States Commission on Civil Rights, Kansas City, Kansas . . 2-2

2.4	Jerome Baiter, Public Interest Law Center of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania ... 2-3

2.5	Doris Bradshaw, Defense Depot Memphis, Tennessee, Concerned Citizens Committee,
Memphis, Tennessee	2-3

2.6	MaVynee Oshun Betsch, A.L. Lewis Historical Society, American Beach, Florida	2-4

2.7	Sarah Craven, Sierra Club, Atlanta, Georgia 	2-4

2.8	Jeannie Economos, Farm Worker Association of Florida, Apopka, Florida	2-4

2.9	Chavel Lopez, Southwest Public Workers Union, San Antonio, Texas 	2-5

2.10	Marvin Crafter, Wollfolk Citizens Response Group, Fort Valley, Georgia 	2-6

2.11	Earnest Marshall, Ombudsman Development Foundation Inc, Atlanta, Georgia	2-6

2.12	Henry Rodriguez, Native American Environmental Protection Coalition, Valley Center,
California	2-6

2.13	Elodia Blanco, Concerned Citizens of Agriculture Street Landfill, New Orleans, Louisiana

	2-6

2.14	Jerilyn Lopez Mendoza, Environmental Defense, Los Angeles, California	2-7

2.15	Donald Brown, People for Environmental Progress and Sustainability, Vallejo, California . 2-7

2.16	Bill Burns, Environmental Awareness Foundation, Atlanta, Georgia 	2-7

2.17	Samara Swanston, Sierra Club, Brooklyn, New York	2-8

2.18	Michelle Xenos, Shundahai Network, Las Vegas, Nevada	2-8

2.19	Jay Gilbert Sanchez, Tribal Environmental Watch Alliance, Espanola, New Mexico	2-9

2.20	Teresa Juarez, New Mexico Alliance, Chimayo, New Mexico 	2-9

2.21	Mark Mitchell, Connecticut Coalition for Environmental Justice, Hartford, Connecticut .... 2-9

2.22	Le Vonne Stone, Fort Ord Environmental Justice Network, Marina, California 	2-10

2.23	Rabbi Dan Swartz, Children's Environmental Health Network, Washington, D.C	2-10

2.24	Jim MacDonald, Pittsburg Unified School District, Pittsburg, California	2-11

2.25	Jackie Ward, Southern Organizing Committee for Economic and Social Justice, Brunswick,
Georgia	2-11

2.26	Fred Lincoln, Wando Concerned Citizen Committee, Wando, South Carolina 	2-11

2.27	Adora Iris Lee, United Church of Christ Commission for Racial Justice, Washington, D.C.

	2-11

2.28	Maria Elena Lucas, Farm Worker, Arlington, Texas	2-11

3.0 FOCUSED PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD HELD ON MAY 24, 2000 	 2-12

3.1	Mable Anderson, Village Creek Human and Environmental Society, Birmingham, Alabama

	2-12

3.2	Karl Fuller, Pechanga Environmental Program, Temecula, California	2-12

3.3	Cecil Corbin-Mark, West Harlem Environmental Action, New York, New York	2-13

3.4	Michael Lythcott, The Lythcott Company, Marlboro, New Jersey	2-13

3.5	Lionel Dyson, Public Interest Law Center of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania ... 2-13

3.6	Daisy Carter, Project Awake, Coatopa, Alabama	2-14

3.7	Gary Grant, Concerned Citizens of Tillery, Tillery, North Carolina	2-14

3.8	Omar Freilla, New York City Environmental Justice Alliance, New York, New York 	2-15

3.9	Mildred McClain, Citizens for Environmental Justice, Savannah, Georgia	2-15

3.10	Beverly Wright, Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head, Aquinnah, Massachusetts 	2-16

3.11	Grace Hewell, Health Policy Group, Chattanooga, Tennessee 	2-16

3.12	Sandra Jaribu Hill, Center for Constitutional Rights, Greenville, Mississippi 	2-17

Atlanta, Georgia, May23 and 24, 2000	2-i


-------
Public Comment Periods

National Environmental Justice Advisory Council

3.13	James Hill, Scarboro Community Environmental Justice Network, Oak Ridge, Tennessee

	2-18

3.14	Mildred Colen, Private Citizen, Warren, Arkansas	2-18

3.15	Caitlin Waddick, City Planning Program, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia

	2-18

3.16	Pat Hartman, Concerned Citizens of Mossville, Westlake, Louisiana 	2-19

3.17	Pat Costner, GreenPeace International, Eureka Springs, Arkansas 	2-19

3.18	Charlotte Keys, Jesus People Against Pollution, Columbia, Mississippi 	2-19

3.19	Ian Zabarte, Western Shoshone National Council, Indian Springs, Nevada 	2-20

3.20	Michelle Xenos, Shundahai Network, Las Vegas, Nevada	2-20

3.21	David Baker, Community Against Pollution, Anniston, Alabama 	2-20

3.22	Natalie Leverette, PEACE, Richton, Mississippi	2-21

3.23	Nan Freeland, Natural Resources Leadership Institute, Raleigh, North Carolina 	2-21

3.24	Connie Tucker, Southern Organizing Committee for Economic and Social Justice, Atlanta,
Georgia	2-21

3.25	Edgar Moss, Mcintosh Environmental Justice Taskforce, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia	2-22

3.26	Usha Little, Native American Environmental Protection Coalition, Valley Center, California

	2-22

3.27	Hazel Johnson, People for Community Recovery, Chicago, Illinois	2-22

3.28	Mark Mitchell, Connecticut Coalition for Environmental Justice, Hartford, Connecticut . . . 2-22

3.29	MaVynee Oshun Betsch, A.L. Lewis Historical Society, American Beach, Florida 	2-23

3.30	Damu Imara Smith, GreenPeace, International, Washington, D.C	2-23

3.31	Elizabeth Crowe, Chemical Weapons Working Group, Berea, Kentucky 	2-23

3.32	Jim MacDonald, Pittsburg (California) Unified School District, Pittsburg, California 	2-24

3.33	Donnel Wilkins, Detroiters Working for Environmental Justice, Detroit, Michigan	2-24

2-ii

Atlanta, Georgia, May 23 and 24, 2000


-------