AEPA
United States
Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Chemical Safety and
Pollution Prevention
Final Risk Evaluation for
C.I. Pigment Violet 29
(Anthra[2,l,9-def:6,5,10-dfeT]diisoquinoline-
1,3,8,10(2H,9H)-tetr one)
Systematic Review Supplemental File:
Data Quality Evaluation of Environmental
Release and Occupational Exposure Data
CASRN: 81-33-4
H
,N.
O
O
January 2021
-------
This document is a compilation of tables for the data extraction and evaluation for
PV-29. Each table shows the data point or set or information element that was extracted and
evaluated from a data source in accordance with Appendix D of the Application of Systematic
Review in TSCA Risk Evaluations. If the source contains more than one data set or information
element, the review provides an overall confidence score for each data set or information element
that is found in the source. Therefore, it is possible that a source may have more than one overall
quality/confidence score.
Table of Contents
Page
Releases to the Environment 3
Occupational Exposure 6
Facility 13
Explanatory Notes
These explanatory notes provide context to understand the short comments in the data evaluation tables.
Domain
Metric
Description of Comments Field
Reliability
Methodology
Indicates the sampling/analytical methodology, estimation method, or
type of publication
Representativeness
Geographic Scope
Indicates the country of the study, publication, or underlying data
Applicability
Indicates whether the data are for a condition of use within scope of the
Risk Evaluation
Temporal Representativeness
Provides the year of study, publication, or underlying data
Sample Size
Describes the distribution of the sample or underlying data
Accessibility / Clarity
Metadata Completeness
Describes the completeness of the metadata
Variability and Uncertainty
Metadata Completeness
Indicates if study or publication addresses variability and uncertainty of
the data or information
Page 2 of 18
-------
Releases to the Environment
Page 3 of 18
-------
Source Citation: Sun Chemical. 2020. Environmental Release, occupational exposure and particle size of PV 29- Sun Chemical"s response".
Type of Data Source Releases to the Environment; Environmental Release Data;
Hero ID 6662866
EXTRACTION
Parameter Data
Life Cycle Stage:
Life Cycle Description (Subcategory of Use):
Release Source:
Disposal /Treatment Method:
Environmental Media:
Daily Release Quantity (kg/day):
Annual Release Quantity (kg/yr):
Release Days per Year:
Number of Sites:
Waste Treatment Method:
Manufacturing
Manufacturing
Violet 29 production
WWTP
sludge
0.77 lb PV29/day to river, 21 lb/day to landfill
7200 lbs PV29/yr to landfill from WWTP sludge, 300 lb/yr to river
365.0
1.0
WWTP
EVALUATION
Domain
Metric
Rating
MWF*
Score
Comments
Domain 1: Reliability
Metric 1:
Methodology
Medium
X 1
2
Data from Source, but no QA/QC or documentation
Domain 2: Representative
Metric 2:
Geographic Scope
High
X 1
1
US Facility data
Metric 3:
Applicability
High
x 2
2
Data from applicable facility
Metric 4:
Temporal Representativeness
High
x 2
2
2016.0
Metric 5:
Sample Size
N/A
N/A
Not applicable; releases calculated as annual total and normal-
ized by number of operating days; no samples taken
Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity
Metric 6: Metadata Completeness Medium X 1 2 Metadata include most critical metadata: wastewater dis-
charges with estimates of discharge frequency and treatment
effectiveness; no information on specific activities or operations
that generate wastewater
Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7: Metadata Completeness Low x 1 3 Not discussed
Continued on next page
Page 4 of 18
-------
— continued from previous page
Source Citation: Sun Chemical. 2020. Environmental Release, occupational exposure and particle size of PV 29- Sun Chemical"s response".
Type of Data Source Releases to the Environment; Environmental Release Data;
Hero ID 6662866
EVALUATION
Domain
Metric
Rating MWF* Score
Comments
Overall Quality Determination^
High 1.5
* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor
t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.
Page 5 of 18
-------
Occupational Exposure
Page 6 of 18
-------
Source Citation: Mott, R. C.. 2017. Personal communication between Dr. Robert C. Mott (Sun Chemical Corporation) and Alie Muneer
(EPA) regarding exposure questions.
Type of Data Source Occupational Exposure; Monitoring Data;
Hero ID 4081896
EXTRACTION
Parameter Data
Life Cycle Stage:
Life Cycle Description (Subcategory of Use):
Physical Form:
Route of Exposure:
Exposure Concentration (Unit):
Number of Samples:
Number of Sites:
Type of Measurement or Method:
Worker Activity:
Number of Workers:
Type of Sampling:
Sampling Location:
Exposure Duration:
Exposure Frequency:
Bulk and Dust Particle Size Distribution:
Engineering Control & percent Exposure Reduction:
PPE:
Analytic Method:
Manufacture
Manufacture
Dust
inhalation
0.5 mg/m3 ("inhalation testing has shown exposure was 0.5mg/m3 over
an 12 hour work shift.")
Not specified
1.0
Not specified
Not specified. Exposure concentration listed "over an 12 hour shift"
not specified
Not specified
Not specified
12 hours
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
not specified (for inhalation exposure - long sleeves and gloves for der-
mal)
Not specified
EVALUATION
Domain Metric Rating MWF* Score Comments
Domain 1: Reliability
Metric 1: Methodology Low x 1 3 No discussion of sampling methodology provided. Only state-
ment that "inhalation testing has shown 0.5 mg/m3 over an 12
hour work shift."
Domain 2: Representative
Continued on next page
Page 7 of 18
-------
— continued from previous page
Source Citation: Mott, R. C.. 2017. Personal communication between Dr. Robert C. Mott (Sun Chemical Corporation) and Alie Muneer
(EPA) regarding exposure questions.
Type of Data Source Occupational Exposure; Monitoring Data;
Hero ID 4081896
EVALUATION
Domain
Metric
Rating
MWF*
Score
Comments
Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:
Geographic Scope
Applicability
Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size
High
High
High
Low
X
X
X
X
1
2
2
1
1
2
2
3
Source is the only known U.S. manufacturing facility
Manufacturing is in scope.
2017; less than 10 years old
Individual samples not provided and no characterization of
sample distribution is provided.
Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity
Metric 6: Metadata Completeness
Low
X
1
3
Reference only states that measurements were of "inhalation
testing", interpreted as breathing zone measurements. No
other metadata provided.
Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7: Metadata Completeness
Low
X
1
3
No discussion of variability or uncertainty
Overall Quality Determination^
Medium
1.9
* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor
I If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.
Page 8 of 18
-------
Source Citation: Sun Chemicals. 2020. Enclosure 1 - EPA request for additional information in response to SACC peer reveiwer and including
public comments on the draft C.I. Pigment Violet 20 Risk Evaluation".
Type of Data Source Occupational Exposure; Monitoring Data;
Hero ID 6656737
EXTRACTION
Parameter Data
Life Cycle Stage:
Life Cycle Description (Subcategory of Use):
Physical Form:
Route of Exposure:
Exposure Concentration (Unit):
Number of Samples:
Number of Sites:
Type of Measurement or Method:
Worker Activity:
Number of Workers:
Type of Sampling:
Sampling Location:
Exposure Duration:
Exposure Frequency:
Bulk and Dust Particle Size Distribution:
Engineering Control & percent Exposure Reduction:
PPE:
Analytic Method:
Manufacture
Manufacture
Dust
inhalation
Range: 0.22 mg/m3-1.2 mg/m3
5
1.0
Sample collection and analysis was performed in accordance with the
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Manual
of Analytical Methods (NMAM) and OSHA Analytical Methods. Sam-
ples were submitted to an AIHA accredited laboratory. Personal samples
for total dust were collected utilizing pre-weighed PVC cassettes. The
samples were collected by utilizing a battery powered personal pump
calibrated before and after use with a TSI 4100 primary calibrator.
Charging big bags to the blenders on elevation 70, Packing-out on level
14
4
PBZ
Elevation 70 blender, miscellaneous places in building 82
12 hours
Not specified
Not specified
Not specified
Safety Glasses, Nitrile Gloves, Tyvek Coveralls, 3M 8511 Paper Dust
Mask (95 percent efficiency) as specified in the detailed work instruc-
tions. Minimum PPE requirements for site-wide production areas in-
clude long-sleeve shirt, long-pants, steeled-toed safety shoes, safety
glasses, and hard hat.
NIOSH 0500 method with working range between 1 to 20 mg/m3 for a
100L air sample
Continued on next page
Page 9 of 18
-------
— continued from previous page
Source Citation: Sun Chemicals. 2020. Enclosure 1 - EPA request for additional information in response to SACC peer reveiwer and including
public comments on the draft C.I. Pigment Violet 20 Risk Evaluation".
Type of Data Source Occupational Exposure; Monitoring Data;
Hero ID 6656737
EVALUATION
Domain
Metric
Rating
MWF*
Score
Comments
EVALUATION
Domain
Metric
Rating
MWF*
Score
Comments
Domain 1: Reliability
Metric 1:
Methodology
Low
X 1
3
NIOSH method 500 was used but lacks the study detail.
Domain 2: Representative
Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:
Geographic Scope
Applicability
Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size
High
High
High
High
X 1
x 2
x 2
x 1
1
2
2
1
Source is the only known U.S. manufacturing facility
Manufacturing is in scope.
IH survey conducted in 2014; less than 10 years old
Individual sample results provided; distribution can be fully
characterized
Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity
Metric 6: Metadata Completeness
High
x 1
1
Metadata include: samples are PBZ, 12-hr durations, and
worker descriptions provided.
Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7: Metadata Completeness
Medium
x 1
2
Uncertainty specified by NIOSH method; variability not ad-
dressed
Overall Quality Determination^
High
1.3
* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor
t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.
Page 10 of 18
-------
Source Citation: The EI Group Inc.. 2020. Industrial Hygiene Survey - Sun Chemical Corporation.
Type of Data Source Occupational Exposure; Monitoring Data;
Hero ID 6656714
EXTRACTION
Parameter Data
Life Cycle Stage:
Life Cycle Description (Subcategory of Use):
Physical Form:
Route of Exposure:
Exposure Concentration (Unit):
Number of Samples:
Number of Sites:
Type of Measurement or Method:
Worker Activity:
Number of Workers:
Type of Sampling:
Sampling Location:
Exposure Duration:
Exposure Frequency:
Bulk and Dust Particle Size Distribution:
Engineering Control & percent Exposure Reduction:
PPE:
Analytic Method:
Manufacture
Manufacture
Fine Dust, Crystalized solid
inhalation
Below detection limit, Concentrations range from <0.65 - <1.15 (mg/
m3)
10 SEG1 worker samples, 2 replicate, 2 blanks [Proposed 10 SEG1 worker
samples]
1.0
Personal breathing samples at 2.0 L/min to calculate full-shift TWA
SEG1: spray dryer pack-out operators;SEG2: PV-29 bag transfer to
IPCs for salt grinding operators; SEG3: tray dryer unloading operators
and 3 employees working adjacent process tasks (loading wet press cake
from super sacks onto drying trays/racks and into dryers);SEG4: G&B
charging operators;SEG5: G&B pack-uot operators and adjacent worker
moving boxed, closed super sacks;
16
PBZ
SEG1: B9-2SEG2: C802 (Elevation 40)SEG3: Buildings Bll-1 and Bll-
2 (open areas)SEG4: Building Bll-1, 3rd floorSEG5: Buildings Bll-1
and Bll-2
Range: 30-124 minutes
Not specified
10 "m to 0.043 "m
SEG1 & SEG3: No engineering controls, general dilution ventilation
from fans and open bay doors;SEG2: Not specified;SEG4 & SEG5: Local
exhaust ventilation system (LEV), baghouse
'All SEG1-SEG5 and adjacent workers used tyvek coveralls, hard hats,
safety glasses, nitrile gloves.SEG1 & SEG 3 also wore half-mask negative
pressure air purifying respirators with N95 filters.
NIOSH 0600
Continued on next page
Page 11 of 18
-------
— continued from previous page
Source Citation:
Type of Data Source
Hero ID
The EI Group Inc.. 2020. Industrial Hygiene Survey
Occupational Exposure; Monitoring Data;
6656714
- Sun Chemical Corporation.
EVALUATION
Domain
Metric
Rating
MWF* Score
Comments
EVALUATION
Domain
Metric
Rating
MWF* Score
Comments
Domain 1: Reliability
Metric 1: Methodology Low x 1 3 Study was conducted with a NIOSH method with approved
modification but short sampling durations and low pump flow
rate resulted in non-detect for most of the samples.
Domain 2: Representative
Metric 2;
Geographic Scope
High
X
1
1
Source is the only known U.S. manufacturing facility
Metric 3;
Applicability
High
X
2
2
Manufacturing is in scope.
Metric 4;
Temporal Representativeness
High
X
2
2
Surveys conducted April-May 2020; less than 10 years old
Metric 5;
Sample Size
High
X
1
1
Individual sample results provided; distribution can be fully
characterized
Domain 3; Accessibility/Clarity
Metric 6; Metadata Completeness
Low
x 1
3
Samples are PBZ, however, full shift is 10.5 hour but all mea-
surements are 30 to 40 min.
Domain 4; Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7; Metadata Completeness
High
x 1
1
Some variability discussion in Monitoring Sampling descrip-
tion; measurement uncertainty specified by analytical method
Overall Quality Determination^
High
1.4
* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor
t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.
Page 12 of 18
-------
Facility
Page 13 of 18
-------
Source Citation: Sun, Chemical. 2017. Safety Data Sheet: PERRINDO" Violet 29.
Type of Data Source Facility; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data;
Hero ID 4121202
EXTRACTION
Parameter Data
Life Cycle Stage:
Life Cycle Description (Subcategory of Use):
Possible Physical Form:
Chemical Concentration:
Industrial/commercial/consumer use
Merchant ink
Powder
90-95 percent
EVALUATION
Domain
Metric
Rating
MWF*
Score
Comments
Domain 1: Reliability
Metric 1:
Methodology
High
X
1
1
Manufacturer Documentation
Domain 2: Representative
Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:
Geographic Scope
Applicability
Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size
High
High
High
N/A
XXX
1
2
2
1
2
2
N/A
US based manufacturer
Physical characteristics of PV-29 applicable to scope
SDS dated 2017; less than 10 years old
No Comment.
Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity
Metric 6: Metadata Completeness
High
X
1
1
All concentration metadata provided
Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7: Metadata Completeness
Medium
X
1
2
Concentration provided as range; range addresses either the
variability or uncertainty of concentration
Overall Quality Determination^
High
1.1
* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor
t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.
Page 14 of 18
-------
Source Citation: TCI America. 2017. Safety Data Sheet: 3,4,9,10-Perylenetetracarboxylic Diimide.
Type of Data Source Facility; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data;
Hero ID 6571256
EXTRACTION
Parameter Data
Life Cycle Stage:
Life Cycle Description (Subcategory of Use):
Possible Physical Form:
Chemical Concentration:
Industrial/commercial/consumer use
Laboratory Chemicals
Crystal-Powder
>95 percent
EVALUATION
Domain
Metric
Rating
MWF*
Score
Comments
Domain 1: Reliability
Metric 1:
Methodology
High
X 1
1
Manufacturer Documentation
Domain 2: Representative
Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:
Geographic Scope
Applicability
Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size
High
High
High
N/A
X 1
x 2
x 2
1
2
2
N/A
US based manufacturer
Physical characteristics of PV-29 applicable to scope
SDS dated 2017; less than 10 years old
No Comment.
Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity
Metric 6: Metadata Completeness
High
x 1
1
All concentration metadata provided
Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7: Metadata Completeness
Medium x 1
2 Concentration provided as range; range addresses either the
variability or uncertainty of concentration
Overall Quality Determination^
High
1.1
* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor
t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.
Page 15 of 18
-------
Source Citation:
Sun, Chemical. 2017. Safety Data Sheet: Violet 29.
Type of Data Source
Facility; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data;
Hero ID
4121201
EXTRACTION
Parameter
Data
Life Cycle Stage: Industrial/commercial/consumer use
Life Cycle Description (Subcategory of Use): Coatings and basecoats, Merchant ink, Professional quality watercolor
and acrylic artist paint
Possible Physical Form: Solid
Chemical Concentration: 100 percent
EVALUATION
Domain
Metric
Rating
MWF*
Score
Comments
Domain 1: Reliability
Metric 1:
Methodology
High
X
1
1
Manufacturer Documentation
Domain 2: Representative
Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:
Geographic Scope
Applicability
Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size
High
High
High
N/A
XXX
1
2
2
1
2
2
N/A
US based manufacturer
Physical characteristics of PV-29 applicable to scope
SDS dated 2017; less than 10 years old
No Comment.
Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity
Metric 6: Metadata Completeness
High
X
1
1
All concentration metadata provided
Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7: Metadata Completeness
Low
X
1
3
No discussion of uncertainty or variability
Overall Quality Determination^
High
1.3
* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor
t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.
Page 16 of 18
-------
Source Citation: BASF. 2011. (NMP).
Type of Data Source Facility; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data;
Hero ID 6656682
EXTRACTION
Parameter Data
Life Cycle Stage:
Life Cycle Description (Subcategory of Use):
Process Description:
Possible Physical Form:
Chemical Concentration:
Manufacture
Manufacture
Bulk PV-29 Particle Size Distribution testing:<100 um=64.6 percent
<10 um=18.5 percent , <4 um=5.1 percent
Solid
3-99 percent
EVALUATION
Domain
Metric
Rating
MWF*
Score
Comments
Domain 1: Reliability
Metric 1:
Methodology
High
x 1
1
Certified analytical results
Domain 2: Representative
Metric 2:
Geographic Scope
Medium
X 1
2
Analysis of German-produced PV-29
Metric 3:
Applicability
High
x 2
2
Physical characteristics of PV-29 applicable to scope
Metric 4:
Temporal Representativeness
High
x 2
2
Particle size distribution test conducted in 2011; <10 years old
Metric 5:
Sample Size
N/A
N/A
No Comment.
Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity
Metric 6: Metadata Completeness High X 1 1 All concentration and particle size distribution metadata pro-
vided
Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7: Metadata Completeness
Medium x 1
2
Concentration provided as range; range addresses either the
variability or uncertainty of concentration. Particle size distri-
bution provided, which addresses variability
Overall Quality Determination^
High
1.3
* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor
t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.
Page 17 of 18
-------
Source Citation: Sun Chemical & U.S. EPA. 2020. PV-29 Particle size and EPA"s follow up questions- Sun ChemicaF's response".
Type of Data Source Facility; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data;
Hero ID 6662857
EXTRACTION
Parameter Data
Life Cycle Stage:
Life Cycle Description (Subcategory of Use):
Process Description:
Number of Sites:
Possible Physical Form:
Manufacture
Manufacture
Mean weight Diameter= 53 nmMedian weight Diameter=
Diameter= 20 micronsMedian Diameter= 10.4 microns
1.0
Solid
43 nm'Mean
EVALUATION
Domain
Metric
Rating
MWF*
Score
Comments
Domain 1: Reliability
Metric 1:
Methodology
High
X
1
1
Manufacturer Documentation
Domain 2: Representative
Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:
Geographic Scope
Applicability
Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size
High
High
Medium
Medium
XXX X
1
2
2
1
1
2
4
2
US based manufacturer
Physical characteristics of PV-29 applicable to scope
Unknown date, though associated data shows date stamp sug-
gesting >10 years
Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics
Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity
Metric 6: Metadata Completeness
Medium
X
1
2
Some metadata included
Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7: Metadata Completeness
Low
X
1
3
No discussion, though some variability provided by statistics,
but uncertainty not discussed
Overall Quality Determination^
Medium
1.7
* MWF = Metric Weighting Factor
t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale:
High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3.
Page 18 of 18
------- |