AEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention Final Risk Evaluation for C.I. Pigment Violet 29 (Anthra[2,l,9-def:6,5,10-dfeT]diisoquinoline- 1,3,8,10(2H,9H)-tetr one) Systematic Review Supplemental File: Data Quality Evaluation of Environmental Release and Occupational Exposure Data CASRN: 81-33-4 H ,N. O O January 2021 ------- This document is a compilation of tables for the data extraction and evaluation for PV-29. Each table shows the data point or set or information element that was extracted and evaluated from a data source in accordance with Appendix D of the Application of Systematic Review in TSCA Risk Evaluations. If the source contains more than one data set or information element, the review provides an overall confidence score for each data set or information element that is found in the source. Therefore, it is possible that a source may have more than one overall quality/confidence score. Table of Contents Page Releases to the Environment 3 Occupational Exposure 6 Facility 13 Explanatory Notes These explanatory notes provide context to understand the short comments in the data evaluation tables. Domain Metric Description of Comments Field Reliability Methodology Indicates the sampling/analytical methodology, estimation method, or type of publication Representativeness Geographic Scope Indicates the country of the study, publication, or underlying data Applicability Indicates whether the data are for a condition of use within scope of the Risk Evaluation Temporal Representativeness Provides the year of study, publication, or underlying data Sample Size Describes the distribution of the sample or underlying data Accessibility / Clarity Metadata Completeness Describes the completeness of the metadata Variability and Uncertainty Metadata Completeness Indicates if study or publication addresses variability and uncertainty of the data or information Page 2 of 18 ------- Releases to the Environment Page 3 of 18 ------- Source Citation: Sun Chemical. 2020. Environmental Release, occupational exposure and particle size of PV 29- Sun Chemical"s response". Type of Data Source Releases to the Environment; Environmental Release Data; Hero ID 6662866 EXTRACTION Parameter Data Life Cycle Stage: Life Cycle Description (Subcategory of Use): Release Source: Disposal /Treatment Method: Environmental Media: Daily Release Quantity (kg/day): Annual Release Quantity (kg/yr): Release Days per Year: Number of Sites: Waste Treatment Method: Manufacturing Manufacturing Violet 29 production WWTP sludge 0.77 lb PV29/day to river, 21 lb/day to landfill 7200 lbs PV29/yr to landfill from WWTP sludge, 300 lb/yr to river 365.0 1.0 WWTP EVALUATION Domain Metric Rating MWF* Score Comments Domain 1: Reliability Metric 1: Methodology Medium X 1 2 Data from Source, but no QA/QC or documentation Domain 2: Representative Metric 2: Geographic Scope High X 1 1 US Facility data Metric 3: Applicability High x 2 2 Data from applicable facility Metric 4: Temporal Representativeness High x 2 2 2016.0 Metric 5: Sample Size N/A N/A Not applicable; releases calculated as annual total and normal- ized by number of operating days; no samples taken Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity Metric 6: Metadata Completeness Medium X 1 2 Metadata include most critical metadata: wastewater dis- charges with estimates of discharge frequency and treatment effectiveness; no information on specific activities or operations that generate wastewater Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty Metric 7: Metadata Completeness Low x 1 3 Not discussed Continued on next page Page 4 of 18 ------- — continued from previous page Source Citation: Sun Chemical. 2020. Environmental Release, occupational exposure and particle size of PV 29- Sun Chemical"s response". Type of Data Source Releases to the Environment; Environmental Release Data; Hero ID 6662866 EVALUATION Domain Metric Rating MWF* Score Comments Overall Quality Determination^ High 1.5 * MWF = Metric Weighting Factor t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale: High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3. Page 5 of 18 ------- Occupational Exposure Page 6 of 18 ------- Source Citation: Mott, R. C.. 2017. Personal communication between Dr. Robert C. Mott (Sun Chemical Corporation) and Alie Muneer (EPA) regarding exposure questions. Type of Data Source Occupational Exposure; Monitoring Data; Hero ID 4081896 EXTRACTION Parameter Data Life Cycle Stage: Life Cycle Description (Subcategory of Use): Physical Form: Route of Exposure: Exposure Concentration (Unit): Number of Samples: Number of Sites: Type of Measurement or Method: Worker Activity: Number of Workers: Type of Sampling: Sampling Location: Exposure Duration: Exposure Frequency: Bulk and Dust Particle Size Distribution: Engineering Control & percent Exposure Reduction: PPE: Analytic Method: Manufacture Manufacture Dust inhalation 0.5 mg/m3 ("inhalation testing has shown exposure was 0.5mg/m3 over an 12 hour work shift.") Not specified 1.0 Not specified Not specified. Exposure concentration listed "over an 12 hour shift" not specified Not specified Not specified 12 hours Not specified Not specified Not specified not specified (for inhalation exposure - long sleeves and gloves for der- mal) Not specified EVALUATION Domain Metric Rating MWF* Score Comments Domain 1: Reliability Metric 1: Methodology Low x 1 3 No discussion of sampling methodology provided. Only state- ment that "inhalation testing has shown 0.5 mg/m3 over an 12 hour work shift." Domain 2: Representative Continued on next page Page 7 of 18 ------- — continued from previous page Source Citation: Mott, R. C.. 2017. Personal communication between Dr. Robert C. Mott (Sun Chemical Corporation) and Alie Muneer (EPA) regarding exposure questions. Type of Data Source Occupational Exposure; Monitoring Data; Hero ID 4081896 EVALUATION Domain Metric Rating MWF* Score Comments Metric 2: Metric 3: Metric 4: Metric 5: Geographic Scope Applicability Temporal Representativeness Sample Size High High High Low X X X X 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 3 Source is the only known U.S. manufacturing facility Manufacturing is in scope. 2017; less than 10 years old Individual samples not provided and no characterization of sample distribution is provided. Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity Metric 6: Metadata Completeness Low X 1 3 Reference only states that measurements were of "inhalation testing", interpreted as breathing zone measurements. No other metadata provided. Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty Metric 7: Metadata Completeness Low X 1 3 No discussion of variability or uncertainty Overall Quality Determination^ Medium 1.9 * MWF = Metric Weighting Factor I If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale: High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3. Page 8 of 18 ------- Source Citation: Sun Chemicals. 2020. Enclosure 1 - EPA request for additional information in response to SACC peer reveiwer and including public comments on the draft C.I. Pigment Violet 20 Risk Evaluation". Type of Data Source Occupational Exposure; Monitoring Data; Hero ID 6656737 EXTRACTION Parameter Data Life Cycle Stage: Life Cycle Description (Subcategory of Use): Physical Form: Route of Exposure: Exposure Concentration (Unit): Number of Samples: Number of Sites: Type of Measurement or Method: Worker Activity: Number of Workers: Type of Sampling: Sampling Location: Exposure Duration: Exposure Frequency: Bulk and Dust Particle Size Distribution: Engineering Control & percent Exposure Reduction: PPE: Analytic Method: Manufacture Manufacture Dust inhalation Range: 0.22 mg/m3-1.2 mg/m3 5 1.0 Sample collection and analysis was performed in accordance with the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Manual of Analytical Methods (NMAM) and OSHA Analytical Methods. Sam- ples were submitted to an AIHA accredited laboratory. Personal samples for total dust were collected utilizing pre-weighed PVC cassettes. The samples were collected by utilizing a battery powered personal pump calibrated before and after use with a TSI 4100 primary calibrator. Charging big bags to the blenders on elevation 70, Packing-out on level 14 4 PBZ Elevation 70 blender, miscellaneous places in building 82 12 hours Not specified Not specified Not specified Safety Glasses, Nitrile Gloves, Tyvek Coveralls, 3M 8511 Paper Dust Mask (95 percent efficiency) as specified in the detailed work instruc- tions. Minimum PPE requirements for site-wide production areas in- clude long-sleeve shirt, long-pants, steeled-toed safety shoes, safety glasses, and hard hat. NIOSH 0500 method with working range between 1 to 20 mg/m3 for a 100L air sample Continued on next page Page 9 of 18 ------- — continued from previous page Source Citation: Sun Chemicals. 2020. Enclosure 1 - EPA request for additional information in response to SACC peer reveiwer and including public comments on the draft C.I. Pigment Violet 20 Risk Evaluation". Type of Data Source Occupational Exposure; Monitoring Data; Hero ID 6656737 EVALUATION Domain Metric Rating MWF* Score Comments EVALUATION Domain Metric Rating MWF* Score Comments Domain 1: Reliability Metric 1: Methodology Low X 1 3 NIOSH method 500 was used but lacks the study detail. Domain 2: Representative Metric 2: Metric 3: Metric 4: Metric 5: Geographic Scope Applicability Temporal Representativeness Sample Size High High High High X 1 x 2 x 2 x 1 1 2 2 1 Source is the only known U.S. manufacturing facility Manufacturing is in scope. IH survey conducted in 2014; less than 10 years old Individual sample results provided; distribution can be fully characterized Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity Metric 6: Metadata Completeness High x 1 1 Metadata include: samples are PBZ, 12-hr durations, and worker descriptions provided. Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty Metric 7: Metadata Completeness Medium x 1 2 Uncertainty specified by NIOSH method; variability not ad- dressed Overall Quality Determination^ High 1.3 * MWF = Metric Weighting Factor t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale: High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3. Page 10 of 18 ------- Source Citation: The EI Group Inc.. 2020. Industrial Hygiene Survey - Sun Chemical Corporation. Type of Data Source Occupational Exposure; Monitoring Data; Hero ID 6656714 EXTRACTION Parameter Data Life Cycle Stage: Life Cycle Description (Subcategory of Use): Physical Form: Route of Exposure: Exposure Concentration (Unit): Number of Samples: Number of Sites: Type of Measurement or Method: Worker Activity: Number of Workers: Type of Sampling: Sampling Location: Exposure Duration: Exposure Frequency: Bulk and Dust Particle Size Distribution: Engineering Control & percent Exposure Reduction: PPE: Analytic Method: Manufacture Manufacture Fine Dust, Crystalized solid inhalation Below detection limit, Concentrations range from <0.65 - <1.15 (mg/ m3) 10 SEG1 worker samples, 2 replicate, 2 blanks [Proposed 10 SEG1 worker samples] 1.0 Personal breathing samples at 2.0 L/min to calculate full-shift TWA SEG1: spray dryer pack-out operators;SEG2: PV-29 bag transfer to IPCs for salt grinding operators; SEG3: tray dryer unloading operators and 3 employees working adjacent process tasks (loading wet press cake from super sacks onto drying trays/racks and into dryers);SEG4: G&B charging operators;SEG5: G&B pack-uot operators and adjacent worker moving boxed, closed super sacks; 16 PBZ SEG1: B9-2SEG2: C802 (Elevation 40)SEG3: Buildings Bll-1 and Bll- 2 (open areas)SEG4: Building Bll-1, 3rd floorSEG5: Buildings Bll-1 and Bll-2 Range: 30-124 minutes Not specified 10 "m to 0.043 "m SEG1 & SEG3: No engineering controls, general dilution ventilation from fans and open bay doors;SEG2: Not specified;SEG4 & SEG5: Local exhaust ventilation system (LEV), baghouse 'All SEG1-SEG5 and adjacent workers used tyvek coveralls, hard hats, safety glasses, nitrile gloves.SEG1 & SEG 3 also wore half-mask negative pressure air purifying respirators with N95 filters. NIOSH 0600 Continued on next page Page 11 of 18 ------- — continued from previous page Source Citation: Type of Data Source Hero ID The EI Group Inc.. 2020. Industrial Hygiene Survey Occupational Exposure; Monitoring Data; 6656714 - Sun Chemical Corporation. EVALUATION Domain Metric Rating MWF* Score Comments EVALUATION Domain Metric Rating MWF* Score Comments Domain 1: Reliability Metric 1: Methodology Low x 1 3 Study was conducted with a NIOSH method with approved modification but short sampling durations and low pump flow rate resulted in non-detect for most of the samples. Domain 2: Representative Metric 2; Geographic Scope High X 1 1 Source is the only known U.S. manufacturing facility Metric 3; Applicability High X 2 2 Manufacturing is in scope. Metric 4; Temporal Representativeness High X 2 2 Surveys conducted April-May 2020; less than 10 years old Metric 5; Sample Size High X 1 1 Individual sample results provided; distribution can be fully characterized Domain 3; Accessibility/Clarity Metric 6; Metadata Completeness Low x 1 3 Samples are PBZ, however, full shift is 10.5 hour but all mea- surements are 30 to 40 min. Domain 4; Variability and Uncertainty Metric 7; Metadata Completeness High x 1 1 Some variability discussion in Monitoring Sampling descrip- tion; measurement uncertainty specified by analytical method Overall Quality Determination^ High 1.4 * MWF = Metric Weighting Factor t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale: High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3. Page 12 of 18 ------- Facility Page 13 of 18 ------- Source Citation: Sun, Chemical. 2017. Safety Data Sheet: PERRINDO" Violet 29. Type of Data Source Facility; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data; Hero ID 4121202 EXTRACTION Parameter Data Life Cycle Stage: Life Cycle Description (Subcategory of Use): Possible Physical Form: Chemical Concentration: Industrial/commercial/consumer use Merchant ink Powder 90-95 percent EVALUATION Domain Metric Rating MWF* Score Comments Domain 1: Reliability Metric 1: Methodology High X 1 1 Manufacturer Documentation Domain 2: Representative Metric 2: Metric 3: Metric 4: Metric 5: Geographic Scope Applicability Temporal Representativeness Sample Size High High High N/A XXX 1 2 2 1 2 2 N/A US based manufacturer Physical characteristics of PV-29 applicable to scope SDS dated 2017; less than 10 years old No Comment. Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity Metric 6: Metadata Completeness High X 1 1 All concentration metadata provided Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty Metric 7: Metadata Completeness Medium X 1 2 Concentration provided as range; range addresses either the variability or uncertainty of concentration Overall Quality Determination^ High 1.1 * MWF = Metric Weighting Factor t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale: High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3. Page 14 of 18 ------- Source Citation: TCI America. 2017. Safety Data Sheet: 3,4,9,10-Perylenetetracarboxylic Diimide. Type of Data Source Facility; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data; Hero ID 6571256 EXTRACTION Parameter Data Life Cycle Stage: Life Cycle Description (Subcategory of Use): Possible Physical Form: Chemical Concentration: Industrial/commercial/consumer use Laboratory Chemicals Crystal-Powder >95 percent EVALUATION Domain Metric Rating MWF* Score Comments Domain 1: Reliability Metric 1: Methodology High X 1 1 Manufacturer Documentation Domain 2: Representative Metric 2: Metric 3: Metric 4: Metric 5: Geographic Scope Applicability Temporal Representativeness Sample Size High High High N/A X 1 x 2 x 2 1 2 2 N/A US based manufacturer Physical characteristics of PV-29 applicable to scope SDS dated 2017; less than 10 years old No Comment. Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity Metric 6: Metadata Completeness High x 1 1 All concentration metadata provided Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty Metric 7: Metadata Completeness Medium x 1 2 Concentration provided as range; range addresses either the variability or uncertainty of concentration Overall Quality Determination^ High 1.1 * MWF = Metric Weighting Factor t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale: High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3. Page 15 of 18 ------- Source Citation: Sun, Chemical. 2017. Safety Data Sheet: Violet 29. Type of Data Source Facility; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data; Hero ID 4121201 EXTRACTION Parameter Data Life Cycle Stage: Industrial/commercial/consumer use Life Cycle Description (Subcategory of Use): Coatings and basecoats, Merchant ink, Professional quality watercolor and acrylic artist paint Possible Physical Form: Solid Chemical Concentration: 100 percent EVALUATION Domain Metric Rating MWF* Score Comments Domain 1: Reliability Metric 1: Methodology High X 1 1 Manufacturer Documentation Domain 2: Representative Metric 2: Metric 3: Metric 4: Metric 5: Geographic Scope Applicability Temporal Representativeness Sample Size High High High N/A XXX 1 2 2 1 2 2 N/A US based manufacturer Physical characteristics of PV-29 applicable to scope SDS dated 2017; less than 10 years old No Comment. Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity Metric 6: Metadata Completeness High X 1 1 All concentration metadata provided Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty Metric 7: Metadata Completeness Low X 1 3 No discussion of uncertainty or variability Overall Quality Determination^ High 1.3 * MWF = Metric Weighting Factor t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale: High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3. Page 16 of 18 ------- Source Citation: BASF. 2011. (NMP). Type of Data Source Facility; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data; Hero ID 6656682 EXTRACTION Parameter Data Life Cycle Stage: Life Cycle Description (Subcategory of Use): Process Description: Possible Physical Form: Chemical Concentration: Manufacture Manufacture Bulk PV-29 Particle Size Distribution testing:<100 um=64.6 percent <10 um=18.5 percent , <4 um=5.1 percent Solid 3-99 percent EVALUATION Domain Metric Rating MWF* Score Comments Domain 1: Reliability Metric 1: Methodology High x 1 1 Certified analytical results Domain 2: Representative Metric 2: Geographic Scope Medium X 1 2 Analysis of German-produced PV-29 Metric 3: Applicability High x 2 2 Physical characteristics of PV-29 applicable to scope Metric 4: Temporal Representativeness High x 2 2 Particle size distribution test conducted in 2011; <10 years old Metric 5: Sample Size N/A N/A No Comment. Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity Metric 6: Metadata Completeness High X 1 1 All concentration and particle size distribution metadata pro- vided Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty Metric 7: Metadata Completeness Medium x 1 2 Concentration provided as range; range addresses either the variability or uncertainty of concentration. Particle size distri- bution provided, which addresses variability Overall Quality Determination^ High 1.3 * MWF = Metric Weighting Factor t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale: High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3. Page 17 of 18 ------- Source Citation: Sun Chemical & U.S. EPA. 2020. PV-29 Particle size and EPA"s follow up questions- Sun ChemicaF's response". Type of Data Source Facility; Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data; Hero ID 6662857 EXTRACTION Parameter Data Life Cycle Stage: Life Cycle Description (Subcategory of Use): Process Description: Number of Sites: Possible Physical Form: Manufacture Manufacture Mean weight Diameter= 53 nmMedian weight Diameter= Diameter= 20 micronsMedian Diameter= 10.4 microns 1.0 Solid 43 nm'Mean EVALUATION Domain Metric Rating MWF* Score Comments Domain 1: Reliability Metric 1: Methodology High X 1 1 Manufacturer Documentation Domain 2: Representative Metric 2: Metric 3: Metric 4: Metric 5: Geographic Scope Applicability Temporal Representativeness Sample Size High High Medium Medium XXX X 1 2 2 1 1 2 4 2 US based manufacturer Physical characteristics of PV-29 applicable to scope Unknown date, though associated data shows date stamp sug- gesting >10 years Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics Domain 3: Accessibility/Clarity Metric 6: Metadata Completeness Medium X 1 2 Some metadata included Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty Metric 7: Metadata Completeness Low X 1 3 No discussion, though some variability provided by statistics, but uncertainty not discussed Overall Quality Determination^ Medium 1.7 * MWF = Metric Weighting Factor t If any individual metrics are deemed Unacceptable, then the overall rating is also unacceptable. Otherwise, the overall rating is based on the following scale: High: > 1 to < 1.7; Medium: > 1.7 to < 2.3; Low: > 2.3 to < 3. Page 18 of 18 ------- |