'ICF

Market Characterization of the U.S.
Metered Dose Inhaler Industry

Prepared for:

Stratospheric Protection Division
Office of Air and Radiation
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, D.C. 20460

Prepared by:

ICF

2550 S Clark St.
Suite 1200
Arlington, VA 22202

February 2021


-------
Table of Contents

1.	Summary	1

2.	Introduction	1

3.	Market Characterization	2

3.1.	Overview of MDI Products	2

3.2.	Major Manufacturers	2

4.	Subsector Background and HFC Use	3

4.1.	Propellants in Medical Inhalers	3

4.2.	Current and Projected Sales of HFC MDIs	6

4.3.	Imports and Exports of MDI Products in the United States	9

5.	References	11

Appendix A: Analysis of the DPI Market	14

DPI Product Sales Analysis	14

Medical Inhaler User Population	16


-------
1.	Summary

Metered dose inhalers (MDIs) are handheld pressurized inhalation systems that deliver small,
precisely measured therapeutic doses of medication directly to the airways of a patient. The
pharmaceutical industry historically used chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), specifically CFC-11,
CFC-12, and CFC-114, as a propellant. The pharmaceutical industry began introducing
hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) propellants for MDIs as replacements for CFCs in the mid-1990s,
specifically HFC-134a in 1996 followed by HFC-227ea in 2006 (also known as
hydrofluoroalkanes (HFA)).

By 2014, the CFC MDI market was replaced with HFC MDIs and not-in-kind (NIK) medical
inhalers. In 2020, approximately 458 metric tons (MT) of HFC-134a and 78 MT of HFC-227ea
propellant were contained in MDIs sold in the United States. The use of HFC MDIs in the United
States is expected to continue as they may be more appropriate for certain patients than NIK
medical inhalers, such as when the patient requires a reliever medication for exacerbations of
asthma, patient preference, or other requirements (e.g., inhalation strength) (GSK 2019,

MCTOC 2018, IPAC 1999). In 2040, approximately 514 MT of HFC-134a and 87 MT of HFC-
227ea propellant is estimated to be sold in MDIs.

2.	Introduction

MDIs are handheld pressurized inhalation systems that deliver small, precisely measured
therapeutic doses of medication directly to the airways of a patient.1 MDIs provide reliable and
effective therapy for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (MCTOC
2018). According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), in 2018 in the
United States, 19.2 million adults and 5.5 million children had asthma while 12.8 million adults
had some form of COPD (CDC 2018a, CDC 2018b).

The pharmaceutical industry historically used CFCs, specifically CFC-11, CFC-12, and CFC-
114, as a propellant in MDIs. The pharmaceutical industry began introducing HFC propellants
for MDIs as replacements for CFCs in the mid-1990s, specifically HFC-134a in 1996 followed by
HFC-227ea in 2006 (also known as HFA2). Medication for asthma and COPD also shifted in
part to not-in-kind (NIK) products in the form of dry powder inhalers (DPIs). The remainder of
this report characterizes HFC use by the pharmaceutical industry for MDIs in the United States,
including key market players and historical and current sales of HFC MDIs and other medical
inhalers.

1	MDIs can be used to administer medicine orally or nasally. Only MDIs designed for oral use are
considered in the scope of this market characterization.

2	In the pharmaceutical industry, HFC is also referred to as HFA and HFC-134a is occasionally referred to
as norflurane.

1


-------
3. Market Characterization

This section provides an overview of MDI products and applications as well as the current
market and key manufacturers.

3.1. Overview of MDI Products

MDI devices include a valve and actuator designed to facilitate a consistent delivery of a specific
dose of a drug to the patient in particles of a specific size distribution delivered via a propellant.
MDIs require gas propellants with vapor pressures that allow them to be liquefied at ambient
temperatures at pressures between 40 and 70 psi inside the canister. Propellants used in MDIs
for inhaled medications must be certified by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as
current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) inhalation grade with high purity levels.

Propellants for MDIs must meet cGMP requirements for the methods, facilities, and controls
used in manufacturing, processing, and packaging to ensure the product is safe for use and that

it has the ingredients and strength it claims to have (FDA		

2020a).

MDI Products Available in 2020

The first HFC MDI approved by the FDA was for albuterol sulfate
utilizing HFC-134a propellant in 1996. As of 2020, the number of
FDA-approved MDI products has expanded considerably (FDA
2020b). Current MDI products and their FDA approval dates are
shown in Table 1. As of 2018, salbutamol (also known as
albuterol) sulfate MDIs still represent approximately 60 percent
of the overall MDI market in the United States (ICF 2020).
Inhalation grade HFC-227ea and HFC-134a are both used in
MDIs as a propellant.

Albuterol Sulfate

Beclomethasone Dipropionate

Budesonide

Ciclesonide

Epinephrine

Fluticasone Propionate

Formoterol Fu ma rate

Formoterol Fumarate Dihydrate

Glycopyrrolate

Ipratropium Bromide

Levalbuterol Tartrate

Mometasone Furoate

Salmeterol Xinafoate

3.2. Major Manufacturers
The United States manufactures MDIs and imports a significant proportion of MDI products from
the European Union (EU) and Asia. Manufacturers of HFC MDIs available in the United States
are listed in Table 1 by product name, active ingredient, propellant type, and date of FDA
approval.3

Table 1. Manufacturers of Currently Available HFC MDIs for use in the United States

Manufacturer3

MDI Product
Name3

Active Ingredient3

FDA Approval
Dateb

HFC-227ea

AstraZeneca

Symbicort®

Budesonide; Formoterol Fumarate
Dihydrate

07/21/2006

Merck Sharp and
Dohme

Asmanex®HFA

Mometasone Furoate

04/25/2014

3 Several manufacturers of MDIs also produce DPIs under the same product line. See Appendix A for a
list of DPI manufacturers.

2


-------
Manufacturer3

MDI Product
Name3

Active Ingredient3

FDA Approval
Dateb

Merck Sharp and
Dohme

Dulera®

Mometasone Furoate; Formoterol
Fumarate Dihydrate

06/22/2010

HFC-134a

Sunovion

Pharmaceuticals Inc

Xopenex®

Levalbuterol Tartrate

03/11/2005

AstraZeneca

Bevespi
Aerosphere®

Formoterol Fumarate; Glycopyrrolate

04/25/2016

Breztri

Aerosphere®

Budesonide; Formoterol Fumarate;
Glycopyrrolate

07/23/2020

Boehringer Ingelheim

Atrovent®

Ipratropium Bromide

11/17/2004

Covis Pharma B.V.

Alvesco®

Ciclesonide

01/10/2008

GlaxoSmithKline

Advair®

Fluticasone Propionate; Salmeterol
Xinafoate

06/08/2006

Flovent®

Fluticasone Propionate

05/14/2004

Ventolin®

Albuterol Sulfate

04/19/2001

Kindeva Drug
Delivery LP

Proventil®

Albuterol Sulfate

08/15/1996

Teva

ProAir®

Albuterol Sulfate

10/29/2004

Norton Waterford
LTD

QVAR®
Redihaler™

Beclomethasone Dipropionate

08/03/2017

Armstrong

Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Primatene Mist

Epinephrine

11/07/2018

Cipla LTD

Generic Albuterol
Sulfate Inhaler

Albuterol Sulfate

04/08/2020

Lupin Inc

Generic Albuterol
Sulfate Inhaler

Albuterol Sulfate

08/24/2020

Perrigo

Pharmaceuticals Co

Generic Albuterol
Sulfate Inhaler

Albuterol Sulfate

02/24/2020

Note: The companies in this report may not represent an exhaustive list of all companies manufacturing within the
United States.
a FDA (2020c).
b FDA (2020b).

4. Subsector Background and HFC Use
4.1. Propellants in Medical Inhalers

Historically the pharmaceutical industry relied on CFC propellants, including CFC-11, CFC-12,
and CFC-114, which have significant ozone depletion potential (ODP) and have been phased
out under the Clean Air Act and Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone
Layer. MDI manufacturers began transitioning to non-ozone-depleting HFC propellants in the
mid-1990s with the introduction of HFC-134a in 1996 followed by HFC-227ea in 2006 (ICF
International 2016, EPA 2020). HFCs were the preferred propellants as MDIs transitioned from
CFCs because HFC propellants allowed for the same continuation of MDI therapy without the
ozone depleting potential. By keeping the function of the therapy the same, there was no
change to the way a patient interacted with the MDI (IPAC 1999).

3


-------
Table 2 summarizes the environmental characteristics, including ODP and global warming
potential (GWP), for current MDI propellants.

Table 2. Environmental Characteristics of Propellants in MDIs

Propellant

ODPa

GWP

HFC-134a

0

1,430

HFC-227ea

0

3,220

Note: GWPs are aligned with the exchange values used in the AIM Act.
a Ozone Secretariat (1987).

HFC-227ea and HFC-134a have demonstrated similar properties to CFC propellants. HFC-
227ea has a lower vapor pressure, so it has primarily been used in HFC-134a formulations to
lower the pressure and provide improved drug substance solubility in certain formulations
(Mexichem Fluor 2015). Industry sources indicate that advances in valve technology have made
the use of HFC-227ea not technically necessary in HFC-134a formulations to reduce the
pressure (Noakes n.d.).

The pharmaceutical industry also made significant shifts toward NIK inhalers such as DPIs and,
more recently, soft mist inhalers (SMIs).4'5 These NIK inhalers have no ODP and no GWP as
they do not contain any propellant. DPIs deliver powdered medication that is propelled by the
inhalation of the patient (MCTOC 2018).

In 2020, approximately 64% of inhaler sales were HFC-134a MDIs and HFC-227ea MDIs
accounted for approximately 11%.6 Table 3, Figure 1, and Figure 2 show the historic unit sales
and HFC propellant sold in medical inhalers in the United States from 2015 through 2020.

Table 3. Historic HFC Propellant Sold in MDIs in the United States (2015-2020)



2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

Amount of HFC Sold in MDIs i

(MT)



HFC-134a

669

597

524

450

452

458

HFC-227ea

119

105

91

76

77

78

Total

788

702

615

526

529

536

Amount of HFC Sold in MDIs i

(MMTCO2 Eq.]

I



HFC-134a

1.02

0.92

0.82

0.72

0.72

0.73

HFC-227ea

0.38

0.33

0.29

0.24

0.24

0.25

Total

1.40

1.25

1.11

0.96

0.96

0.98

Note: Totals may not sum due to independent rounding.
Source: EPA (2020).

4	The only manufacturer of FDA-approved SMIs is Boehringer Ingelheim (FDA 2020c).

5	The lengthy development and regulatory timescales, the rarity of new technical advancements, as well
as the higher costs for new SMIs compared to MDIs and DPIs make SMIs less relevant to the discussion
of the current and near future pharmaceutical market and will therefore not be discussed further in this
market characterization. (MCTOC 2018).

6	The market of NIK inhalers is assumed to be the share necessary to meet the estimated forecasted
medical inhaler demand and is calculated as the total inhaler market minus the HFC MDI market. A
separate analysis was conducted to further investigate the size of the NIK inhaler market (see Appendix
A).

4


-------
Figure 1. Historic Sales of Medical Inhalers in the United States (2015-2020) ('000 Units)

120,000

100,000

c

Z)
o
o
o

80,000

v 60,000

40.000

20.000

0

2015

2016	2017	2018	2019

¦ HFC-134a »HFC-227ea h Not-In-Kind

2020

Sources: EPA (2020), MCTOC (2018), Appendix A

Note: The 2015-2016 NIK estimates were derived from a DPI market share of 30%

(MCTOC 2018). NIK estimates for 2017-2019 were determined in the DPI sales analysis
detailed in Appendix A. The 2020 NIK estimate was determined by applying the growth
rate of MDIs between 2019 and 2020 in EPA (2020).

Figure 2. HFC Propellant for MDIs Sold in the United States (2015-2020) (Million Metric Tons CO2

Equivalent (MMT C02 Eq.))

Source: EPA (2020).

EPA is not aware of any available propellants on the market that are currently alternatives to
HFCs as propellants in MDIs, due to concerns with toxicity and flammability. The two most

5


-------
promising potential replacements for HFC-134a and HFC-227ea are HFO-1234ze(E) and HFC-
152a. Both have most of the requisite physical properties to function as a propellant in MDIs
with significantly lower GWPs than the current HFCs in use; however, neither propellant has
significant use in pharmaceuticals and will require extensive clinical research before they could
replace the current HFCs (Pritchard 2020).

HFO-1234ze(E) is mainly used in refrigeration, technical aerosols, and some novelty aerosols
(e.g., party string), and long-term human safety data would need to be collected before it could
be considered for use in MDIs (Pritchard 2020). HFC-152a was considered as a possible
replacement for CFCs in MDIs along with HFC-134a and HFC-227ea; however, its higher
density and flammability would require numerous changes to manufacturing processes and the
MDI design to ensure safe and effective use (Pritchard 2020).

Koura, formerly Mexichem Fluor,7 considers HFC-152a to be a likely replacement for other HFC
propellants, because manufacturing sites can be adapted for the safe-handling of flammable
materials (Koura 2021). Propellant-only clinical trials for HFC-152a have been approved by the
FDA and it is anticipated that program data from these trials will support the completion of a
Drug Master File (DMF) for the commercial use of medical-grade HFC-152a with the goal of
introducing commercially available HFC-152a MDIs (Corr 2020).

NIK inhalers are not expected to completely replace HFC MDIs, as NIK inhalers have a different
mechanism for the delivery of medication. MDI inhalers may be more appropriate for certain
patients, such as when the patient requires a reliever medication for exacerbations of asthma,
patient preference, or other requirements (e.g., patient inhalation strength) (GSK2019, MCTOC
2018, IPAC 1999).

4.2. Current and Projected Sales of HFC MDIs

EPA's Vintaging Model (EPA 2020) estimates that 56 million HFC MDIs (48 million HFC-134a
MDIs and 8 million HFC-227ea MDIs) were sold in the United States in 2020, which accounts
for both MDI products manufactured in the United States and MDIs imported from the EU and
Asia. HFC MDI estimates were based on ICF (2020), an MDI sales analysis conducted as an
update to EPA's Vintaging Model. The estimates in this analysis were derived from annual U.S.
MDI sales in dollars, the estimated average manufacturers price (AMP) of MDIs, and the charge
size of MDIs, differentiating between HFC-134a and HFC-227ea MDIs (ICF 2020).

7 Koura is the largest supplier of medical grade HFC propellants globally and in the United States. Koura's
global market share of HFC propellants for MDIs is 75%.

6


-------
Annual U.S. MDI sales were reported in annual reports from MDI manufacturing companies8
(see Table 1). If sales data were unavailable for an MDI product,9 Medicaid's State Drug
Utilization Data (SDUD) of MDI product (in grams) reimbursed per year were used as a proxy10
(ICF 2020). The AMP per unit was gathered from the National Average Drug Acquisition Costs
(NADAC) metric that is reported annually by Medicaid and converted to AMP, utilizing the data
from Levinson (2005) to account for difference between wholesale and retail cost as well as the
pricing of generic versus proprietary inhalers.

The average charge size (i.e., propellant quantity) per unit was assumed to be equal to the net-
fill weight of each cannister, because the active ingredients in MDI products typically make up
less than 0.01% by weight of the total product.11 The resulting average charge size for HFC-
134a inhalers is 10.5 grams and 9.6 grams for HFC-227ea inhalers based on the volume sold
per MDI unit (ICF 2020, EPA 2020). Using the year of peak MDI sales (i.e., 2011 and 2014 for
HFC-134a and HFC-227ea, respectively), the resulting amount of HFC propellant in MDIs sold
in 2020 is 536 metric tons (MT) (i.e., 458 MT of HFC-134a and 78 MT of HFC-227ea) (EPA
2020). HFCs in MDIs in the United States accounts for 0.5 percent of total estimated HFC use in
2020 (EPA 2020).

Between 2015 and 2018, estimated HFC MDI sales decreased by 31%, from 80 million units to
55 million units as shown in Figure 1.12 NIK inhalers are not expected to completely replace
HFC MDIs; therefore, EPA (2020) assumes that the HFC MDI market retains its size post-2018,
with a growth rate of approximately 1% per year through 2030 and 0.8% per year from 2030
through 2040 to align with expected population growth based on projections from the U.S.
Census (U.S. Census 2017, EPA 2020). In 2020, HFC propellant sold in MDIs is estimated to
grow to approximately 601 MT in 2040 (i.e., 514 MT of HFC-134a and 87 MT of HFC-227ea).
EPA (2020) does not currently model transitions from HFC-134a and HFC-227ea to HFC-152a
in MDIs; however, the replacement of current HFC propellants by HFC-152a prior to 2040 is
possible (Koura 2021). The projected amount of HFC propellant in MDIs sold from 2020 through
2040 can be found in Table 4, Figure 3, and Figure 4.

8	In instances where a manufacturer did not delineate between MDI and DPI sales in the same product
line, products were assumed to be MDIs.

9	Alvesco®, Aerospan® (not included in Table 1 as it was discontinued in 2018), and Atrovent® were the
only MDIs in the sales analysis for which Medicaid data was utilized.

10	Information on the proportion of the U.S. MDI market that is met with Medicaid reimbursement products
was not readily available, thus sales from this proxy data is likely underestimated. (ICF 2020)

11	This value was derived from a review of MDI product labels attained from the National Institutes of
Health U.S. National Library of Medicine DailyMed database (NIH 2021).

12	Although the ICF (2020) MDI sales analysis estimates a decrease in HFC MDI sales from 2015 to
2018, it is possible sales remained constant or increased during that period. Estimated HFC MDI sales
from 2015 to 2018 could be underestimated as a result of assumptions on the market penetration of
generics and AMP.

7


-------
Table 4. Projected HFC Propellant Sold in MDIs in the United States (2020-2040)



2020

2025

2030

2035

2040

Amount of HFC Sold in MDIs (MT)

HFC-134a

458

474

489

502

514

HFC-227ea

78

80

83

85

87

Total

536

554

572

587

601

Amount of HFC Sold in MDIs (MMT C02 Eq.)

HFC-134a

0.73

0.75

0.78

0.81

0.84

HFC-227ea

0.25

0.25

0.26

0.27

0.28

Total

0.98

1.0

1.04

1.08

1.12

Note: Totals may not sum due to independent rounding.

Figure 3. Projected HFC Propellant in MDIs Sold in the United States (2020-2040) (MT)

700

600

Q 500

2 400

O

if)

J 300

CD
CL

o

Ql 200
O

Li.

x 100

2020

2025	2030

¦ HFC-227ea «HFC-134a

2035

2040

Source: EPA (2020).

Figure 4. Projected HFC Propellant in MDIs Sold in the United States (2020-2040) (MMT CO2 Eq.)

Source: EPA (2020).

8


-------
For comparison, approximately 123 ± 12 million HFC MDIs (i.e., 97 million HFC-134a MDIs and
26 million HFC-227ea MDIs, corresponding to 1,018 MT ± 89 MT of HFC-134a and 250 MT ±
38 MT of HFC-227ea, respectively) were manufactured in and imported into the United States in
2019 as derived from Koura bulk gas and imported MDI estimates (Koura 2021).13 The values
estimated by Koura take into consideration several assumptions that may be overestimated
(e.g., amount of MDI product imported into the United States by manufacturers) (Koura 2021).
In addition, the annual estimates do not consider users and inhalers directly, but rather models
used for manufacturing, which may not necessarily reflect the consumer inhaler market that
year (e.g., does not account for inventory of MDI products) (Koura 2021). Given the various
assumptions and uncertainties associated with EPA (2020) and the Koura model, it is likely that
actual annual HFC MDI use in the United States is between 56 and 123 million MDIs.

4.3. Imports and Exports of MDI Products in the United States
As noted above in Section 3.2, the manufacture of MDIs does occur in the United States, but
the United States also imports HFC MDIs from the EU and other trading partners. It is estimated
that the amount of MDI products manufactured in the United States is approximately equal to
the amount of MDI products imported to the United States (Koura 2021).

Table 5 summarizes the countries exporting HFC MDIs into the United States. Exporting
countries were identified from available import/export information databases14 and cross-
referenced with the Drug Establishments Current Registration Site (DCERS)15 to determine if
the product was manufactured in the exporting country (SeAir 2021, Zauba 2021, FDA 2020d).
MDIs imported into the United States come from two regions, the EU (Belgium, France,
Germany, Spain, Sweden, and the Netherlands) and Asia (China, India, Japan, and Singapore)
(SeAir 2021, Zauba 2021). The imported MDIs were likely manufactured in China, France,
Germany, India, Singapore, and Sweden (FDA 2020d).

Table 5

>. Origin of HFC MDIs Imported into the United

States

Manufacturer3

MDI Product Name3

Exporting
Countries'5

Manufacturing Facility
Found on DECRS List?

HFC-227eac

AstraZeneca

Symbicort®

Belgium, Germany,
Sweden

Belgium: No
Germany: No
Sweden: Yes

Merck Sharp and Dohme

Asmanex®HFA

Singapore

Yes

13	Koura (2021) estimates are in metric tonnes and have been converted to MDIs assuming the same
charge as that for the MDI sales analysis. It was assumed that estimates from Koura for manufacturing
uses were equal to the MDI sales and use in that same year.

14	Exporting country represents the country of the final port before entry into the United States and does
not necessarily represent the country where the product was manufactured.

15	The Drug Establishments Current Registration Site (DCERS) is a database of current information
submitted by drug firms to register establishments (facilities) which "manufacture, prepare, propagate,
compound or process drugs that are commercially distributed in the U.S. or offered for import to the U.S."
FDA (2020d).

9


-------
Manufacturer3

MDI Product Name3

Exporting
Countries'5

Manufacturing Facility
Found on DECRS List?

Merck Sharp and Dohme

Dulera®

No Import Records Found

HFC-134a

Sunovion

Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Xopenex®

India

Yes

AstraZeneca

Bevespi Aerosphere®

Belgium

No

AstraZeneca

Breztri Aerosphere®

No Import Records Found

Boehringer Ingelheim

Atrovent®

The Netherlands

No

Covis Pharma B.V.

Alvesco®

No Import Records Found

GlaxoSmithKline

Advair®

China, Japan

China: Yes
Japan: No

GlaxoSmithKline

Flovent®

France

Yes

GlaxoSmithKline

Ventolin®

Japan, Spain

Japan: No
Spain: No

Kindeva Drug Delivery LP

Proventil®

No Import Records Found

Teva

ProAir®

Belgium, Germany

Belgium: No
Germany: Yes

Norton Waterford LTD

QVAR® Redihaler™

Records Found but not Viewable

Armstrong

Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Primatene Mist

No Import Records Found

Cipla LTD

Generic Albuterol
Sulfate Inhaler

India

Yes

Lupin Inc

Generic Albuterol
Sulfate Inhaler

No Import Records Found

Perrigo Pharmaceuticals
Co

Generic Albuterol
Sulfate Inhaler

No Import Records Found

Note: Due to limited availability of import/export information, the data provided may not be a total representation of
all importers of HFC MDIs into the United States.
a FDA (2020c).

b Based on U.S. import information found from Seair EXIM Solutions (Seair2021) and Zauba Technologies Pvt Ltd
(Zauba 2021)

c The vast majority of HFC-227ea MDIs are imported into the United States mostly from the EU and most recently
from India (Koura 2021)

10


-------
5. References

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2014a. Use of long-term control medication
among persons with active asthma. Available online at:
https://www.cdc.gov/asthma/asthma stats/lonqterm medication.htm.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2014b. Frequent use of quick-relief
medication among persons with active asthma. Available online at:
https://www.cdc.gov/asthma/asthma stats/overuse.htm.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2018a. Summary Health Statistics Table for
U.S. Adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2018, tables A-2b, A-2c. Available online at:
https://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Health Statistics/NCHS/NHIS/SHS/2018 SHS Table A-2.pdf

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2018b. Summary Health Statistics Table for
U.S. Children: National Health Interview Survey, 2018, tables C-1b, C-1c. Available online at:
https://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Health Statistics/NCHS/NHIS/SHS/2018 SHS Table C-1.pdf.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2020. Asthma Action Plans. Available
online: https://www.cdc.gov/asthma/actionplan.html.

Corr, Stuart. 2020 HFA-15a as a Sustainable pMDI Propellant. Koura. Available online at:
https://www.zephex.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Corr-202Q-1.pdf.

De Marco et al. 2013 The coexistence of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
9COPD): Prevalence and risk factors in young, middle-aged, and elderly people from the
general population. PLoS One. Available online at:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3651288/#!po=32.3529.

Department of Health & Human Services (DHHS) Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
2006. Medicaid Drug Rebate Program. Release No. 73: Bulletin for Participating Drug
Manufacturers. Available online at: https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid-chip-program-
inform ation/by-topics/prescription-drugs/downloads/rx-releases/mfr-releases/mfr-rel-073.pdf.

Department of Health & Human Services (DHSS) Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
2010. Medicaid Drug Rebate Program. Release No. 82: Bulletin for Participating Drug
Manufacturers. Available online at: https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid-chip-program-
inform ation/bv-topics/prescription-drugs/downloads/rx-releases/mfr-releases/mfr-rel-082.pdf.

Giraud and Allaert. 2009. Improved asthma control with breath-actuated pressurized Metered
Dose Inhaler (pMDI): The SYSTER Survey. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological
Sciences. September 2009. Available online at:

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Francois Allaert/publication/40448031 Improved asthma
control with breath-

actuated pressurized Metered Dose Inhaler pMDI The SYSTER survev/links/5ad58ee3a6fd

cc293580ad2c/lmproved-asthma-control-with-breath-actuated-pressurized-Metered-Dose-

lnhaler-pMDI-The-SYSTER-survev.pdf.

11


-------
GlaxoSmithKline. 2019, GSK Public policy positions: respiratory products and global warming.
Available online at: https://www.gsk.com/media/2962/respiratory-products-and-global-warming-
policv.pdf.

ICF International. 2016. Preliminary Assessment of Global HFC Consumption in Aerosols.
Prepared by ICF International for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). September
2016.

ICF. 2020. Observed Trends for HFC-227ea Emissions in the United States and HFC-227ea
and HFC-134a Emissions from the MDI Aerosols End-Use in EPA's Vintaging Model. Prepared
by ICF for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). June 24, 2020.

International Pharmaceutical Aerosol Consortium (IPAC). Ensuring Patient Care: The Role of
the HFC MDI 2nd edition. 1999. Available online at: https://f1856665-a297-420b-a480-
7c0957181470.filesusr.com/ugd/495d79 cecf8e047cd84c67999dec8cc7f03ef1.pdf.

Koura. 2021. Personal communication between Tim Noakes (Koura), Richard Greenhough
(Koura), Maureen Hardwick (International Pharmaceutical Aerosol Consortium (IPAC)), Mark
Wagner (ICF), and Paula Garcia-Holley (ICF). February 2, 2021.

Levinson, D.R. 2005. Medicaid Drug Price Comparisons: Average Manufacturer Price to
Published Prices. June 2005. Available online at: https://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-05-05-
00240.pdf.

Levy et. al. 2013. Asthma patients inability to use a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI)
correctly correlates with poor asthma control as defined by the Global Initiative for Asthma
(GINA) strategy: a retrospective analysis. US National Library of Medicine. National Institutes of
Health. Available online at:

https://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6442852/#!po=6.25000.

Medicaid. 2020a. State Drug Utilization Data. Available online at:

https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/prescription-drugs/state-drug-utilization-data/index.html.

Medicaid 2020b.November 2019 medicaid & CHIP Enrollment Data Highlights. Available online
at: https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/program-information/medicaid-and-chip-enrollment-
data/report-highlights/index.html.

Medical and Chemicals Technical Options Committee (MCTOC). Report of the Medical and
Chemical Technical Options Committee 2018 Assessment Report. 2018. Nairobi, Kenya: United
Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Available online at:

https://ozone.unep.org/sites/default/files/2019-04/MCTQC-Assessment-Report-2018.pdf.

Mexichem Fluor. 2015. Response to Charge Letter: Request for Data on HFC Consumption in
the Global Aerosols Sector sent on December 1, 2015. Correspondence with Tim Noakes.
December 11, 2015.

National Institutes of Health (NIH). 2021. U.S. National Library of Medicine DailyMed Database.
Available online at: https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/index.cfm. Accessed January 7, 2021.

Noakes, Tim. n.d. HFA Propellants: Manufacture, storage, and use. Avoiding problems.
Mexichem Fluor. Available online at: http://www.unido.ru/upload/files/d/2dav mexichem.pdf.

12


-------
Ozone Secretariat. 1987. The Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer.
United National Environment Programme (UNEP). Available Online at:
https://ozone.unep.org/treaties/montreal-protocol.

Pritchard, John. 2020. The Climate is Changing for Metered-Dose Inhalers and Action is
Needed. US National Library of Medicine. National Institutes of Health. Available online at:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7410333/.

SeaAir EXIM Solutions. Global Trade Data. Available online at: https://www.seair.co.in/global-
trade-data/usa-import-data.aspx. Accessed January 8, 2021.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2020. Vintaging Model. Version VM 10
file_v5.1_10.08.20.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 2020a. Current Good Manufacturing Practice
(CGMP) Regulations. Available online at: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/pharmaceutical-guality-
resources/current-good-manufacturing-practice-cgmp-regulations.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 2020b. Drugs@FDA: FDA-Approved Drugs.
Available online at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/index.cfm.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 2020c. Orange Book: Approved Drug Products with
Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations. Available online at:
https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/ob/index.cfm.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 2020d. Drug Establishments Current Registration
Site (DCERS). Available online at: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cder/drls reg.zip.

Zauba Technologies Pvt Ltd. U.S. Import Data. Available online at:
https://www.zauba.com/USA-imports-exports/lmports. Accessed January 8, 2021.

13


-------
Appendix A: Analysis of the DPI Market

An analysis of the DPI market was performed to inform the total medical inhaler market size and
market penetration of NIK inhalers. The analysis is based on sales data for DPI products from
annual manufacturer reports and the SDUD of Medicaid. The estimates derived using this
approach were then compared with the total potential inhaler market estimated for the U.S.
population with asthma and COPD.

DPI Product Sales Analysis

A total of 25 proprietary DPI products were identified in the United States (see Table 6). In 2019,
only 15 of the 25 proprietary DPI products were available in the market as the remainder were
discontinued or were not reported due to low sales volumes.

Table 6. Manufacturers of DPIs

Manufacturer3

DPI Product
Name3

Active Ingredient3

FDA Approval
Date3

AstraZeneca

Pulmicort®
Flexhaler®

Budesonide

7/12/2006

Tudorza
Pressair®

Aclidinium Bromide

7/23/2012

Duaklir Pressair®

Aclidinium Bromide; Formoterol
Fu ma rate

3/29/2019

Boehringer
Ingelheim

Spiriva®

Tiotropium Bromide

1/30/2004

GlaxoSmithKline

Breo Ellipta®

Fluticasone Furoate; Vilanterol
Trifenatate

5/10/2013b
4/30/2015C

Flovent Diskus®

Fluticasone Propionate

9/29/2000

Advair
Diskus®1

Fluticasone Propionate; Salmeterol
Xinafoate

8/24/2000

Incruse® Ellipta®

Umeclidinium Bromide

4/30/2014

Relenza®

Zanamivir

7/26/1999

Arnuity® Ellipta®

Fluticasone Furoate

8/20/2014d
5/17/2018e

Trelegy Ellipta

Fluticasone Furoate; Umeclidinium
Bromide; Vilanterol Trifenatate

9/18/201 r
9/9/20209

Anoro® Ellipta®

Umeclidinium Bromide; Vilanterol
Trifenatate

12/18/2013

Serevent®

Salmeterol Xinafoate

9/19/1997

Merck Sharp and
Dohme

Asmanex
Twisthaler

Mometasone Furoate

3/5/2005h
2/1/2008'

Mylan

Pharmaceuticals Inc

TOBI® Podhaler

Tobramycin

3/22/2013

Wixela Inhub

Fluticasone Propionate; Salmeterol
Xianfoate

1/30/2019

Sunovion

Pharmaceuticals

Inc.

Arcapta®
Neohaler

Indacaterol

7/1/2011J

Seebri Neohaler

Glycopyrrolate

10/29/201 &

Utibron
Neohaler®

Indacaterol/ Glycopyrrolate

10/29/201 &

Teva

Proair Digihaler

Albuterol Sulfate

12/21/2018

Proair
Respiclick®

Albuterol Sulfate

3/31/2015

14


-------
Manufacturer3

DPI Product
Name3

Active Ingredient3

FDA Approval
Date3



Armonair
Digihaler

Fluticasone Propionate

2/20/2020

Teva

ArmonAir®
RespiClick®

Fluticasone propionate

1/27/2017k

Airduo Digihaler®

Fluticasone Propionate; Salmeterol
Xinafoate

6/12/2019



Airduo
Respiclick®

Fluticasone Propionate; Salmeterol
Xinafoate

1/27/2017

Note: Bolded manufacturer entries represent manufactures that produce both DPIs and MDIs. Bolded DPI
products represent product lines that consist of both DPIs and MDIs.
a FDA (2020c).

b FDA approval of Breo Ellipta 0.1 mg/inhale; EQ 0.025 mg base/inhale on 5/10/2013.
c FDA approval of Breo Ellipta 0.2mg/inhale; EQ 0.025 mg base/inhale on 4/30/2015.
d FDA approval of Arnuity Ellipta 0.1 mg/inhale and 0.2 mg/inhale on 8/20/2014.
e FDA approval of Arnuity Ellipta .05 mg/inhale on 5/17/2018.

f FDA approval of Trelegy Ellipta 0.1 mg/inhale; EQ .0625 mg base/inhale; EQ .025 mg base/inhale on 9/18/2017.
g FDA approval of Trelegy Ellipta 0.2 mg/inhale; EQ .0625 mg base/inhale; EQ .025 mg base/inhale on 9/9/2020.
h FDA approval of Asmanex Twisthaler 0.22 mg/inhale on 3/30/2005.

' FDA approval of Asmanex Twisthaler 0.11 mg/inhale on 2/1/2008.

j Arcapta® Neohaler, Seebri Neohaler, and Utibron Neohaler® were discontinued 3/10/2020.
k Armonair® RespiClick® was discontinued in 2017.

Sales data, in dollars, for DPI products were obtained from annual reports of their respective
manufacturing companies. If sales data for certain products were not publicly available (i.e.,
Serevent®, Relenza®, TOBI® Podhaler, Asmanex® Twisthaler®, and Wixela™ Inhub™), data
from the SDUD of Medicaid were used as a proxy. The SDUD provides information on the
number of units of DPI product that Medicaid is reimbursing (e.g., 22,320,652 units of Anoro®
Ellipta® of Alvesco® reimbursed in 2019), the number or prescriptions, and the amount
reimbursed. When sales data from annual reports were lower than the reimbursement value
from the SDUD (i.e., Tudorza Pressair®), the larger value was applied.

Using this approach, approximately 18.9 million DPIs were assumed to be sold and used in the
United States in 2019. Considering that the estimated HFC MDI market size by EPA (2020) in
2019 is 55.3 million inhalers, the total market size for inhalers in the United States was 74.2
million (see Table 7). Therefore, the market share of DPIs is 25 percent while that of HFC MDIs
is 75 percent. This market share is close to that reported for the United States market in
MCTOC (2018), i.e., 30 percent DPIs.

Table 7. Estimated MDI and DPI Use in the United States (2019)



Number of Inhalers

Percent of Total

HFC MDIs

55,344,000a

75%

DPIs

18,903,907

25%

Total Inhalers

74,247,907

100%

a EPA (2020).

15


-------
Medical Inhaler User Population

In 2018, approximately 12.8 and 24.7 million people had COPD and asthma, respectively, in the
United States (CDC 2018a, CDC 2018b). Based on this data, potential annual inhaler use was
estimated under four different scenarios, as shown in Table 8. In the most conservative scenario
(Scenario 1), 100% of the population with COPD and/or asthma was assumed to use one
inhaler per month for 12 months (i.e., 12 inhalers per year).16 In the most realistic scenario
(Scenario 4), 50% of the population with COPD and/or asthma was assumed to use one inhaler
a month for three months of the year.17 This analysis results in a large range of annual inhaler
use, from 19.1 million to 450 million units annually (see Figure 5).

Some people can have both asthma and COPD18 and others do not use medication.19
Furthermore, some medications are administered differently from inhalers (e.g., use of
nebulizer). In addition, although it is estimated that DPIs last for a month20 and HFC MDI
inhalers for long-term control are also consumed within a month, when inhalers are used as a
rescue (i.e., quick-relief) medication, they may last longer.

A summary of the assumptions for the four scenarios and two analyses conducted to estimate
the size of the U.S. medical inhaler market are summarized in Table 8, and is followed by Figure
5, which compares the resulting estimates of each approach.

Table 8. Assumptions for Analyses on Estimated Annual Inhaler Use in the United States

Scenario/Analysis

Assumptions

Scenario 1

100% of population with COPD and/or asthma use one
inhaler per month for 12 months (2018)

Scenario 2

50% of population with COPD and/or asthma use one inhaler
a month for 12 months (2018)

Scenario 3

100% of population with COPD and/or asthma use one
inhaler per month for 3 months (2018)

Scenario 4

50% of population with COPD and/or asthma use one inhaler
a month for 3 months (2018)

16	Although some asthma and COPD patients may be prescribed multiple inhalers a month as part of their
asthma action plans, including a long-term control and a quick-relief inhaler, use of one inhaler a month is
assumed to be a reasonable scenario because some patients may not use prescribed inhalers (CDC
2020).

17	Over 60% of MDI patients in a study were unable to use their MDI device and there is evidence that
poor inhalation technique impacts both asthma control and patient adherence to treatment (Giraud and
Allaert 2009, Levy et al. 2014). Therefore, it is likely that although treatments may be prescribed for long-
term control, the actual use period is shorter and a 3-month treatment was assumed.

18	De Marco et al. (2013) indicate that for subjects with asthma the percentage of the asthma-COPD
overlap syndrome was 16%, 30%, and 61% for ages 20-44, 45-64, and 65-84, respectively. In addition,
De Marco et al. (2013) report that for subjects with COPD the percentage of the asthma-COPD overlap
syndrome was 33%, 27%, and 25% forages 20-44, 45-64, and 65-84, respectively.

19	Nearly 39.0% of all adults and 40.2% of all children with self-reported active asthma used at least one
kind of LTC medication in the past 3 months (CDC 2014a). Furthermore, nearly 24.3% of all adults and
18.7% of all children self-reported active asthma used quick-relief medications (QRMs) frequently in the
past 3 months and using more than 2 days per week is considered frequent use (CDC 2014b).

20	Multi-dose DPIs typically contain enough doses for at least one month's treatment (MCTOC 2018).

16


-------
Scenario/Analysis

Assumptions

MDI Sales + DPI Sales

Combined results from ICF (2020) MDI sales analysis (see
Section 4.2) and DPI sales analysis (see Appendix A)

U.S. Estimates Derived
from MCTOC (2018)
Derived Estimates for USA

Reflects assumptions reported in MCTOC (2018) for the
global and U.S. MDI and DPI markets (see Footnote Error!
Bookmark not defined.)

U.S. MDI Estimates
Derived from Koura (2021)

Reflects MDI estimates derived from Koura (2021) bulk gas
and MDI import estimates

Figure 5. Comparison of Analyses of U.S. Medical Inhaler Market Size (2018/2019)a


-------
MDIs and DPIs) is between 74 and 225 million inhalers annually with DPI use ranging from 19
to 68 million inhalers annually.

ICF recognizes several assumptions may warrant further review and refinement, including:

•	Five of the 25 DPI products identified have generics available (i.e., Flovent Diskus®,
Advair Diskus®,22 Wixela™ Inhub™, AirDuo Digihaler®, and AirDuo RespiClick®). It
was assumed that sales from the generics were negligible, although it is possible that
they are sizable and calculated DPI volumes are underestimated.

•	One "prescription" as reported in the SDUD corresponds to one inhaler and one "unit"
corresponds to one dose. The Unit Type Each as defined by Medicaid Manufacturer
Release No. 73 and Manufacturer Release No. 82 do not indicate if a unit is an inhaler
or a dose (DHHS 2006, DHHS 2010). Furthermore, Release No. 73 indicates that
labelers erroneously report drugs using the Unit Type Each (DHHS 2006). Should a
"unit" be equivalent to an inhaler rather than a dose, results of the analysis would be
underestimated.

•	As of September 2020, only 21 % of the United States population was enrolled in the
Medicaid program and there is no readily available information on how much of the DPI
market is met with Medicaid reimbursed products (Medicaid 2020b). Thus, the DPI
sales, and therefore, use estimated from SDUD data for these products (i.e., Serevent®,
Relenza®, TOBI® Podhaler, Asmanex® Twisthaler®, and Wixela™ Inhub™) is likely
underestimated.

22 A generic version of Advair Diskus is available from Hikma Pharmaceuticals and was approved by the
FDA on 12/17/2020.

18


-------