United States Water Management Division
Environmental Protection Wetlands, Coastal & Nonpoint Source Section
Aoencv Atlanta< December, 2007
Brunswick ODMDS Status and Trends
May 2006
% mil!'w\n\vm
''''>//?/// I'll l\\i
fcv®::v ¦
-------
BRUNS 1 ^ ^ ; " ¦ »
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
-------
BRUNSWICK '" ' ¦ : ' '¦ ¦ Ti ' .. :
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Samples were collected May 7-8, 2006 from the Brunswick Ocean Dredged Material
Disposal Site (Doug Johnson, Site Manager; Gary W. Collins, Chief Scientist). Sample
tracking and custody were performed by Phyllis Meyer. Water quality profiling and
sampling were led by Christopher McArthur. Sediment sampling was led by Steve
Blackburn. On-board sample processing of the invertebrate samples, chemical samples,
and the sediment particle size samples were led by Doug Johnson, Jennifer Derby and Kris
Carter, respectively.
In addition, the scientific party would like to express their appreciation to the following
members of senior-level management for taking the time out of their hectic schedules to
allow us the opportunity to demonstrate the capabilities of the OSV Bold, along with our
ocean protection monitoring techniques: Regional Administrator J.I. Palmer, Jr., Chief of
Staff Don Christy, Water Division Director James Giattina, and WCNS Branch Chief Tom
Wei born.
Appropriate Citation:
U.S. EPA. 2007. Brunswick ODMDS - Status and Trends, December 2007. U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, Water Management Division, Wetlands, Coastal
& Nonpoint Source Branch, Coastal Section, SNAFC, 61 Forsyth St. SW, Atlanta, GA 30303.
-------
BRUNSWICK '" ' ¦ : ' '¦ ¦ Ti ' .. :
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
-------
BRUNSWICK '" ' ¦ : ' '¦ ¦ Ti ' .. :
Table of Contents
Section Page
Introduction 1
Background 1
Survey Area and Location 1
Methods and Materials 2
Sampling Stations 2
Water Quality 2
Seafloor Sampling 2
Sediment Particle Size 3
Sediment Chemistry 3
Benthic Macroinvertebrate Infauna 3
Results and Discussion 3
Water Quality 3
Seafloor Sampling 4
Sediment Particle Size 4
Sediment Chemistry 4
Benthic Macroinvertebrate Infauna 4
Conclusions 5
References 6
List of Tables
Table No. Description
1 Brunswick ODMDS, 2006 Sampling Stations
2 Water Quality Data, Brunswick ODMDS, May 2006
3 Sediment Particle Size, Brunswick ODMDS, May 2006
-------
BRUNSWICK '" ' ¦ : ' '¦ ¦ Ti ' .. :
List of Tables fcont.^
Table No. Description
4 Metals Analysis, Brunswick ODMDS, May 2006
5 Infaunal Parameters, Brunswick ODMDS, May 2006
6 Comparative Summary, Brunswick ODMDS, May 2006
List of Figures
Figure No. Description
1 Brunswick ODMDS, 2006 Sampling Stations
2 Dissolved Oxygen and Turbidity Profiles - Brunswick ODMDS, May 2006
3 Temperature and Salinity Profiles - Brunswick ODMDS, May 2006
4 Grain Size Distribution - Brunswick ODMDS, May 2006
Appendices
A Scientific Party
B Sediment Particle Size Distribution
C Sediment Chemistry - Metals, Extractables, Pesticides and PCBs
D Water Quality/CTD Data/Water Chemistry - Metals, Extractables,
Pesticides and PCBs
E Benthic Data Extracted from Vittor, 2007.
F Target Detection Limits
-------
BRUNSWICK '" ' ¦ : ' '¦ ¦ Ti ' .. :
INTRODUCTION
Ocean disposal of dredged materials can affect the environment of a disposal site by
disturbing the benthic community and potentially causing long-term reduction of oxygen in
the pore waters of the sediments and the overlying waters. Natural oceanographic
processes can also be responsible for transporting disposed materials offsite into nearby
habitats.
As part of Region 4's strategy to monitor the effects of dredged material disposal
within the marine environment, routine surveys of the benthos and water column within
and adjacent to our sites are conducted so that their status may be assessed. In addition,
the data is archived so that over time, trends which may occur can be observed. These
status and trends surveys are consistent with the requirements of 40 C.F.R. 228.9. The
present study being discussed was conducted aboard the Ocean Survey Vessel (OSV) Bold,
May 7-8, 2006.
BACKGROUND
The Brunswick ODMDS was designated by EPA in 1989. The ODMDS receives an
average of over 900,000 cubic yards of dredged material annually from the Brunswick
Harbor Navigation Project. Project sediments typically range from 2 to 72 percent fine-
grained material.
A Site Management and Monitoring Plan was developed for the Brunswick ODMDS
in 1999. Annual bathymetry surveys have been conducted at the site by the Corps of
Engineers. The last status and trends survey conducted at this ODMDS was in July 1995.
Survey Area and Location
The study area is within and surrounding the Brunswick, GA ODMDS located offshore
Jekyll Island. The survey area is approximately 2 square nautical miles (nmi). Twelve
stations were selected in order to analyze the sediment grain size, chemical, and biological
characteristics of two areas - one where disposal has occurred and the other one
undisturbed by disposal. Of these 12, one received water quality sampling. Depths in this
area average approximately 30 feet. The ODMDS boundary corner coordinates are:
31o02'35"N 81o17'40"W
31o02'35"N 81°16'30"W
31°00'30"N 81°16'30"W
31°00'30"N 81°17'42"W
The ODMDS, survey area and station locations are shown in Figure 1.
-------
BRUNSWICK '" ' ¦ : ' '¦ ¦ Ti ' .. :
METHODS AND MATERIALS
Method Rationale: Characterization of the benthic community and sediment size/chemistry at
selected stations, followed by analysis of community parameters via statistical treatment,
allows for identification and interpretation of changes in the community structure. Such
community statistics can be used to draw inferences regarding perturbations to the benthic
macroinvertebrate community and subsequently allow for judgments regarding the
likelihood of impact from dredged material disposal.
Sampling Stations
The boundaries of the Brunswick ODMDS measure approximately 1X2 nmi. Twelve
stations (see Table 1 and Figure 1) were established by selecting half within and half
outside of the site. Station locations were selected in a stratified, random manner.
Water Quality
To characterize the general water quality associated with the dump site, the following water
column parameters were sampled: conductivity, dissolved oxygen (DO), salinity,
temperature, density, turbidity, % light transmission and Chlorophyll a.
All measurements were accomplished utilizing the OSV Bold's CTD. At the surface and
bottom, Go Flow® bottles attached to the CTD/rosette frame were deployed to obtain grab
samples for the laboratory analysis. Once the rosette was back aboard the ship, the bottles
were emptied directly into the appropriate sample containers, labeled, and refrigerated until
demobilization. Laboratory analysis of the water includes nutrients, metals, PAHs, PCBs and
pesticides. In addition, one other sample container was filled with bottom water and
analyzed for dioxins.
Sea floor Samoling
Bottom sampling at all twelve stations was accomplished by a minimum of two deployments
of a Young grab (surface area = 0.04 m 2; depth of 10 cm) from the stern of the ship.
After retrieval of the grab and confirmation of an adequate sample, the device was either
sub-sampled in order to obtain discrete samples for sediment particle size analyses and
sediment chemical analyses, or used entirely for benthic macroinvertebrate identification.
The sampling device and handling/preservative protocol for each type of sample follows
below:
-------
BRUNSWICK '" ' ¦ : ' '¦ ¦ Ti ' .. :
Sediment Particle Size
Two separate samples for particle size were collected from the Young grab by acrylic
5 cm diameter coring tubes. The subsamples were placed into whirl packs, labeled, and
frozen for return to the lab. The samples were analyzed at the Science and Ecosystem
Support Division (SESD) laboratory by laser defraction (USEPA, 2001a). In addition, SESD
provided data from all stations by wet sieving the fraction of the sample larger than 2 mm
(USEPA, 2001b). The results of the laser analyses were converted from '% volume' to 'wet
weight.'
Sediment Chemistry
Analyses for the following parameters were conducted at the SESD lab in Athens,
Georgia: heavy metals scan, nutrients which includes total phosphorous (TP), N02+N03,
NH3, and TKN, extractable organic compounds, pesticides, and PCBs. The sample was
transferred to a glass pan and thoroughly mixed. The sample was alloquated into two
236.6 ml. glass containers and preserved by storing at 4 C until analyzed. One container
was analyzed for extractable organic compounds and the other was analyzed for metals and
nutrients. In addition, at stations B01, B04, B07 and B12, one additional container was
filled from the sample and analyzed for dioxins. Due to tight budgetary constraints, only
four discrete samples for dioxin analyses were allocated to this study.
Benthic Macroinvertebrate Infauna
Sediment from a separate deployment of the grab were collected to obtain benthic
macroinvertebrate organisms. On-board processing involved washing the sample through a
#35 screen (0.5mm). The sample retained on the screen after washing was preserved in
10% seawater formalin with staining solution. Benthic containers were labeled both
internally and externally and stored for transfer to contract lab facilities. The details of
sorting and identification of infaunal taxa are described in Vittor, 2007.
All sampling procedures and sample preservation for analyses were according to the SESD
Standard Operating Procedures (SOP), (US EPA 1996, 2002).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Water Quality
The results of the water quality profile are summarized in Table 2. The data showed
the site's water column to be extremely well-mixed, evident by the narrow ranges seen
within all the parameters measured.
-------
BRUNSWICK '" ' ¦ : ' '¦ ¦ Ti ' .. :
Dissolved oxygen during the sample period exhibited a narrow range (6.14 - 6.28
mg/L; see Table 2 and Figure 2) while turbidity ranged from 1.51 to 2.85 NTUs (see Table
2 and Figure 2). Temperature and salinity (see Table 2 and Figure 3) profiles also showed
that the waters sampled at the Brunswick ODMDS are well-mixed. Temperatures ranged
from 22.30 to 22.91 OC; salinities ranged from 33.02 to 33.73 ppt.
Chemical analyses of the water samples collected as part of this study showed that,
with the exception of three metals and several dioxin congeners, all analytes to be
undetectable within the specified target reporting limits. The metals that were detected
were aluminum (60 - 86 ug/L), arsenic (12 - 15 ug/L), and copper (8.4 ug/L).
Sea floor Sampling
Sediment Particle Size.
The results of the sediment particle size analyses are given in Table 3. Both zones
sampled during this survey are dominated by sediments in the sand fraction with small
percentages of both gravel and silt/clays (see Table 3 and Figure 4).
Sediment Chemistry.
As with water chemical analyses, only select dioxin congerers and nine metals were
detected in sediments taken from the ODMDS and surrounding area. The metals data is
summarized in Table 4. For all nine metals detected, the mean concentration of the
sediments were consistently lower for stations within the ODMDS than those outside the
site. With the exception of results for iron, variability was also much higher at stations
surrounding the site than at stations within the site.
Benthic Macroinvertebrate Infauna.
The benthic infauna data is detailed and summarized in "Brunswick, Georgia ODMDS
2006 Benthic Community Assessment "(Vittor, 2007). Polychaetes dominated the total
assemblage (59.5%), and also ranked first in number of taxa (48.3%) represented. In
terms of abundance, the polychaetes were followed by malacostracans (29.8%), bivalves
(2.5%) and ophiuroids (1.6%): by taxa, the polychaetes were followed by malacostracans
(23.3%), bivalves (12.2%) and gastropods (5.8%). In general, the stations representing
both inside the ODMDS and outside the ODMDS were dominated by a mixed assemblage of
polychaetes and arthropods.
-------
BRUNSWICK '" ' ¦ : ' '¦ ¦ Ti ' .. :
The dominant taxa found inside the ODMDS were the polychaete Spiophanes
bombyx(31.95 %), the amphipod Oxyurosty/is smithi(11.6%) and the amphipod
Protohaustorius sp. B (5.75%).
The dominant taxa found outside the ODMDS were the polychaete Spiophanes
bombyx (19.81%), the polychaete Mediomastus [LPIL] (12.01%), the polychaete
Mediomastus ambiseta (8.23%), the amphipod Metatiron tropakis (7.24%) and the
a m ph i pod Oxyurosty/is smithi (7.04%).
Mean densities were 7937.8 organisms/m^ within the ODMDS and 104475.0
organisms/m2 outside the ODMDS. There was not a significant difference in density
between stations inside vs. outside (Vittor, 2007).
The mean number of taxa was 42.3 taxa/station inside the ODMDS 46.5 taxa/station
outside the ODMDS. Again, there was not a significant difference in mean number of taxa
between stations inside vs. outside (Vittor, 2007).
The results of cluster, ANOSIM and SIMPLER analyses are discussed in detail within
Vittor, 2007. In summary, these results indicate that assemblages inside and outside the
ODMDS are similar. Table 5 lists the infaunal community parameters by station.
CONCLUSIONS
When comparing the various study parameters, no significant differences are found
between the benthic infaunal communities of the Brunswick ODMDS and those of the
surrounding area. Table 6 summarizes the main parameters of this study, demonstrating
that no physical, chemical nor biological difference can be seen.
The mean grain size is nearly identical both within and outside the ODMDS. While
both taxa richness and density of the infaunal communities show numerical higher means
outside the site than within, there is no statistical difference between the two areas.
Statistical analysis was not done to compare metals concentrations due to the fact that
sediments within the site averaged lower than those outside the site. The main objective of
Status and Trends studies is identifying 'signs/symptoms' of potential adverse impacts due
to dumping of dredged materials within the ODMDS. The presence of significantly elevated
contaminant levels within the site compared to outside would be such a 'sign/symptom.' In
this case, the reverse was true.
In conclusion, the data collected in May 2006 shows that the benthic communities
within the Brunswick ODMDS compare favorably with those adjacent to the dump site, and
at the most basic levels of comparison, no long term adverse impact from dumping of
dredged material has occurred.
-------
BRUNSWICK '" ' ¦ : ' '¦ ¦ Ti ' .. :
REFERENCES
ASTM D-422. Standard Test Method for Particle Size Analysis of Soils. American Society for
Testing and Materials. Pennsylvania. 1994.
USEPA. 1996. Environmental Investigations Standard Operating Procedures and Quality
Assurance Manual. US Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4. Athens, GA.
USEPA. 2001a. Standard Operating Procedure for the Determination of Particle Size Analysis
using the Coulter LS 200. Analytical Support Branch. US Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4. Athens, GA.
USEPA. 2001b. Standard Operating Procedure for the Determination of Particle Size Class
Distribution - Wet Sieve. Ecological Support Branch. US Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4. Athens, GA.
USEPA. 2002. Standard Operation Procedures Ecological Assessment Branch. US
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4. Athens, GA.
Vittor. 2007 - Brunswick, Georgia ODMDS 2006 Benthic Community Assessment. Barry A.
Vittor & Associates, Inc., Mobile, Alabama.
-------
BRUNSWICK '" ' ¦ : ' '¦ ¦ Ti ' .. :
Table 1. Brunswick ODMDS Status and Trends Stations - May 2006.
2006 (Degrees, minutes) Young CTD
Station ID Latitude(N) Longitude(W) Grabs(v/n) Casts(v/n)
BR01
31 02.47725 N
81
15.92801 W
y
n
BR02
31 00.92317 N
81
15.92801 W
y
n
BR03
31 00.00023 N
81
16.30868 W
y
n
BR04
31 00.00023 N
81
17.59168 W
y
n
BR05
31 00.85031 N
81
18.00055 W
y
n
BR06
31 01.67598 N
81
18.49401 W
y
n
BR07
31 02.28302 N
81
17.38020 W
y
n
BR08
31 02.29516 N
81
16.66116 W
y
n
BR09
31 01.57885 N
81
17.30970 W
y
y
BRIO
31 01.56671 N
81
16.67525 W
y
n
BR11
31 00.92317 N
81
17.32380 W
y
n
BR12
31 00.92317 N
81
16.70345 W
y
n
Table 2. Brunswick ODMDS Water Quality (CTD) Data - May 2006
Deoth (meters)
Deoth (feet)
Temperature ©
Salinitv foot)
DO (ma/L)
Turbiditv (ntu's)
1.21
3.97
22.93
33.02
6.27
1.81
1.44
4.72
22.91
33.03
6.27
1.82
1.61
5.29
22.92
33.02
6.27
1.80
1.88
6.17
22.87
33.08
6.26
1.88
2.16
7.08
22.91
33.03
6.27
1.80
2.45
8.04
22.74
33.24
6.28
1.79
2.70
8.86
22.74
33.23
6.21
1.81
2.90
9.51
22.83
33.13
6.23
1.71
3.27
10.73
22.77
33.20
6.27
1.64
3.63
11.91
22.60
33.39
6.24
1.66
3.88
12.73
22.58
33.42
6.22
1.59
4.09
13.42
22.56
33.44
6.21
1.51
4.35
14.27
22.55
33.45
6.21
1.53
4.59
15.06
22.47
33.54
6.21
1.52
4.78
15.68
22.44
33.58
6.20
1.60
4.97
16.30
22.39
33.64
6.18
1.56
5.24
17.19
22.31
33.72
6.17
2.85
5.39
17.68
22.30
33.73
6.14
2.49
5.63
18.47
22.33
33.70
6.14
2.03
5.75
18.86
22.33
33.70
6.14
2.00
6.05
19.84
22.33
33.70
6.14
2.04
6.23
20.43
22.32
33.71
6.15
2.28
NOTE: Numbers in bold type reflect maximum values observed within each parameter whereas those in italics reflect
minimum values.
-------
BRUNSWICK '" ' ¦ : ' '¦ ¦ Ti ' .. :
Table 3. Brunswick ODMDS Sediment particle size - April 2006.
NOTE: station IDs omitted to demonstrate that each serves as a replicate for each treatment (inside vs. outside)
Laser analysis (% wet weight)
Outside
Inside
%grave
%grave
%fines
%sands
1
%fines
%sands
1
0.60
98.80
0.6
1.40
97.40
1.2
8.90
88.50
2.6
1.40
95.60
3.0
5.70
91.00
3.3
1.40
97.20
1.4
2.30
88.00
9.7
0.40
83.10
16.5
5.40
89.10
5.5
2.70
95.00
2.3
9.20
89.90
0.9
25.80
73.20
1.0
mean
5.35
90.88
3.77
5.52
90.25
4.24
std dev
3.45
4.02
3.43
9.96
9.92
6.08
varianc
e
11.88
16.17
11.75
99.27
98.49
36.91
Wet sieve method (% wet weight)
Outside
Inside
%grave
%grave
%fines
%sands
1
%fines
%sands
1
1.30
98.10
0.6
1.50
97.30
1.2
3.60
93.80
2.6
1.40
95.60
3.0
1.80
94.90
3.3
1.50
97.10
1.4
1.90
88.40
9.7
1.10
82.40
16.5
3.00
91.50
5.5
2.30
95.40
2.3
4.00
95.10
0.9
7.70
91.30
1.0
mean
2.60
93.63
3.77
2.58
93.18
4.24
std dev
1.09
3.34
3.43
2.54
5.71
6.08
varianc
e
1.19
11.13
11.75
6.44
32.57
36.91
-------
BRUNSWICK '" ' ¦ : ' '¦ ¦ Ti ' .. :
Table 4.
Aluminu
m
Arsenic
Cadmium
Iron
Manganese
Zinc
Outside
Inside
Outside
520
590
1.2
1300
590
2.4
610
510
1.4
1000
260
Outside
Inside
2
1800
720
mean
1188.3
728.3
2.5
1900
1700
Std dev
584.75
499.90
2.9
var
341937
249897
Chromium
Outside
Inside
Outside
0.14
0.14
3.5
0.19
0.12
5.1
0.12
0.12
3.2
0.13
0.12
Outside
Inside
4.3
0.2
0.12
mean
0.153
0.128
6.7
0.14
0.15
std dev
0.033
0.013
6.8
var
0.0011
0.0002
Lead
Outside
Inside
Outside
1200
1300
0.86
1800
1300
1.30
1400
1300
0.76
2100
820
Outside
Inside
1.20
3500
1300
mean
2416.7
1486.7
2.00
4500
2900
std dev
1304.48
718.52
1.90
var
1701667
516267
Nickel
Outside
Inside
Outside
22
29
1.00
29
78
1.10
37
44
0.98
43
25
Outside
Inside
0.99
69
31
mean
48.2
41.0
1.20
89
39
std dev
25.71
19.40
1.20
var
661.0
376.4
Outside
Inside
2.7
2.9
4.6
2.8
2.9
2.4
4.3
1.7
Outside
Inside
Inside
1.1
1.2
1.1
0.7
1.4
1.7
Inside
2.9
2.7
2.2
1.3
3.5
4.9
Inside
0.83
0.73
0.70
0.49
0.96
1.50
Inside
0.99
0.98
0.98
0.99
0.99
1.10
Outside
Inside
mean
1.078
1.005
std dev
0.1036
0.0468
var
0.0107
0.0022
Outside
Inside
mean
2.07
1.20
std dev
0.662
0.335
var
0.439
0.112
Outside
Inside
mean
4.93
2.92
std dev
1.56
1.22
var
2.42
1.49
Outside
Inside
mean
1.337
0.868
std dev
0.517
0.346
var
0.267
0.120
-------
BRUNSWICK '" ' ¦ : ' '¦ ¦ Ti ' .. :
7.3
3.0
mean
5.23
3.03
9.6
5.4
std dev
2.70
1.25
var
7.29
1.57
Table 5. Infaunal Community Parameters - Brunswick ODMDS, May 2006.
Station Taxa Richness Density Diversity Evenness
Outside the ODMDS
B01
27
3450.0
2.50
0.76
B02
77
12150.0
3.55
0.82
B03
54
6775.0
2.83
0.71
B04
51
20150.0
2.38
0.61
B05
40
15050.0
2.17
0.59
B06
30
5275.0
2.21
0.65
Mean
46.5
10475.0
2.61
0.69
Std. Dev.
18.45
6440.85
Inside the ODMDS
B07
31
3927.0
2.62
0.76
B08
49
10825.0
2.52
0.65
B09
37
6600.0
2.69
0.74
B10
43
5425.0
3.13
0.83
Bll
41
9075.0
2.29
0.62
B12
53
11775.0
2.45
0.62
Mean
42.3
7937.8
2.62
0.70
Std. Dev.
8.0
3115.9
-------
BRUNSWICK '" ' ¦ : ' '¦ ¦ Ti ' .. :
Table 6. Comparative Summary - Brunswick ODMDS, May 2006.
Inside ODMDS Outside ODMDS
Grain Size Analyses
Wet sieve
2006
2006
% gravel
4.24
3.77
% sand
93.18
93.63
% silt/clay
2.58
2.60
Laser
% gravel
4.24
3.77
% sand
90.25
90.88
% silt/clay
5.52
5.35
Sediment chemistry
Mean conc. (ppm)
Mean conc. (ppm)
Aluminum
692.9
1188.3
Arsenic
1.17
2.07
Cadmium
0.127
0.153
Chromium
2.80
4.93
Iron
1445.7
2416.7
Lead
0.836
1.337
Manganese
41.3
48.2
Nickel
1.003
1.078
Zinc
2.94
5.23
Infauna analyses
Taxa richness (#spp./station)
Minimum
31.0
27.0
Maximum
53.0
77.0
Mean
42.3
46.5
Density (#organisms/m2)
Minimum
3927.0
3450.0
Maximum
11775.0
20150.0
Mean
7937.8
10475.0
Taxa diversity (H1)
Mean
2.62
2.61
Taxa evenness (J1)
Mean
0.70
0.69
-------
BRUNSWICK ODMDS STATUS AND TRENDS - MAY 2006
Figure 1. Brunswick sample stations, May, 2006
(station BR09 also sampled for water samples)
-------
BRUNSWICK ODMDS STATUS AND TRENDS - MAY 2006
Brunswick ODMDS CTD
0.00
-1.ocP
"3f -2.00
2
0) -3.00
E.
T -4.00
Q.
0)
Q
-5.00
-6.00
-7.00
DO 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.
!
#
/
I
e*
DO
— Dissolved
oxygen
—¦—Turbidity
Oxygen (mg/L); Turbidity (ntu's)
Figure 2. Dissolved Oxygen and Turbidity Profiles - Brunswick ODMDS, May 2006
Brunswick ODMDS CTD
0.00
j/> -2.00
0)
1 -3.00
^ -4.00
^ -5.00
-6.00
-7.00
)00
25.00 30.00 35
I
I
I
1
1
*
00
— Temp
—•—Salinity
Temp (C); Salinity (ppt)
Figure 3. Temperature and Salinity Profiles - Brunswick ODMDS, May 2006
-------
BRUNSWICK ODMDS STATUS AND TRENDS - MAY 2006
Grain Size - Brunswick ODMDS May 2006
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
~ % fines, inside
¦ % sands, inside
~ % gravel, inside
¦ % fines, outside
¦ % sands, outside
¦ % gravel, outside
Figure 4. Grain Size Distribution - Brunswick ODMDS, May 2006
-------
BRUNSWICK '" ' ¦ : ' '¦ ¦ Ti ' .. :
APPENDIX A
SCIENTIFIC PARTY
Name
Survey Responsibility
Organization
1) Gary Collins
2) Christopher McArthur
3) Doug Johnson
4) Phyllis Meyer
5) Steve Blackburn
6) Jennifer Derby
7) Kris Carter
Chief Scientist
Water Quality/Navigation
Invertebrate Processing
Sample Tracking
Deck Ops
Sample Processing
Sample Processing
EPA/ Atlanta
EPA/ Atlanta
EPA/Atlanta
EPA/Athens
EPA/Atlanta
EPA/Atlanta
EPA/Atlanta
-------
BRUNSWICK '" ' ¦ : ' '¦ ¦ Ti ' .. :
-------
BRUNSWICK '" ' ¦ : ' '¦ ¦ Ti ' .. :
Appendix B
Sediment Particle Size Distribution - Laser Analysis and Wet Sieve
-------
BRUNSWICK ¦ ¦ ' Tif! ' , m
Table Bl. - Laser Analysis
% by weight
Very, fine
clay
silt
sand
BR01
0.5
0.1
4.2
BR02
1.9
7.0
5.1
BR03
1.4
4.3
4.1
BR04
0.8
1.5
3.3
BR05
1.6
3.8
17.6
BR06
2.5
6.7
31.0
BR07
1.0
0.4
5.4
BR08
1.0
0.4
5.0
BR09
0.9
0.5
4.1
BRIO
0.2
0.2
0.1
BR11
1.0
1.7
4.9
BR12
3.7
22.1
11.5
fine, sand
medium sand
coarse sand
very coarse sand
Gravel
53.4
26.2
11.6
3.4
0.6
35.3
22.2
18.3
7.6
2.6
32.8
26.3
18.7
9.0
3.3
29.3
19.5
15.7
20.3
9.7
43.0
11.7
9.2
7.6
5.5
50.1
4.3
4.5
0.0
0.9
54.2
23.8
10.1
3.9
1.2
50.1
23.6
10.8
6.2
3.0
43.1
31.4
13.7
5.0
1.4
1.7
12.2
38.3
30.8
16.5
36.8
23.8
19.6
9.8
2.3
38.4
14.4
8.3
0.5
1.0
-------
BRUNSWICK ¦ ¦ ' Tif! ' , m
Table B2. - Wet Sieve Analysis
% by weight
Clay silt
Very .fine sand
fine, sand
medium sand
coarse sand
very coarse sand
Gravel
BROl
1.2
0.1
2.8
68.0
23.6
2.8
0.7
0.6
BR02
1.7
1.9
5.5
61.3
18.5
6.3
2.2
2.6
BR03
1.5
0.3
2.7
47.7
36.4
5.8
2.4
3.3
BR04
1.5
0.4
4.3
50.4
19.2
6.1
8.2
9.7
BR05
1.7
1.3
16.3
63.8
6.8
2.2
2.4
5.5
BR06
2.0
2.0
26.8
66.3
1.4
0.4
0.2
0.9
BR07
1.4
0.1
3.9
76.9
12.2
2.9
1.4
1.2
BR08
1.3
0.1
3.6
73.8
13.1
3.0
2.1
3.0
BR09
1.4
0.1
3.2
64.9
22.8
4.5
1.7
1.4
BRIO
1.0
0.1
0.4
6.2
25.5
31.8
18.4
16.5
BR11
1.7
0.6
5.4
58.4
18.9
8.8
4.0
2.3
BR12
2.2
5.5
10.2
66.1
12.4
1.8
0.8
1.0
-------
BRUNSWICK ¦ ¦ ' Tif! ' , m
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
-------
BRUNSWICK ¦ ¦ ' Tif! ' , m
APPENDIX C
Sediment Chemistry - Metals, Extractabies, Pesticides, PCBs and Dioxins
-------
BRUNSWICK ¦ ¦ ' Tif! ' , m
Table CI. Sediment Metals Analyses - Branswick ODMDS, May 2006.
(concentrations reported as mg/kg, dry
weight)
B01
B02
B03
B04
B05
B06
B07
B08
B09
B09D
B10
Bll
B12
Aluminum
520
1300
610
1000
1800
1900
590
590
510
480
260
720
1700
Antimony
0.25u
0.25u
0.25u
0.25u
0.25u
0.25u
0.25u
0.24u
0.24u
0.25u
0.25u
0.25u
0.25u
Arsenic
1.2
2.4
1.4
2
2.5
2.9
1.1
1.2
1.1
0.96
0.7
1.4
1.7
Beryllium
0.3u
0.3u
0.3u
0.3u
0.3u
0.3u
0.3u
0.29u
0.29u
0.3u
0.3u
0.3u
0.3u
Cadmium
0.14
0.19
0.12u
0.13
0.2
0.14
0.14
0.12u
0.12u
0.12u
0.12u
0.15
0.12u
Chromium
3.5
5.1
3.2
4.3
6.7
6.8
2.9
2.7
2.2
2.1
1.3
3.5
4.9
Copper
lu
0.99u
0.98u
0.99u
0.99u
0.99u
0.99u
0.98u
0.98u
0.99u
0.99u
0.99u
lu
Iron
1200
1800
1400
2100
3500
4500
1300
1300
1300
1200
820
1300
2900
Lead
0.86
1.3
0.76
1.2
2
1.9
0.83
0.73
0.7
0.64
0.49
0.96
1.5
Manganese
22
29
37
43
69
89
29
78
44
43
25
31
39
Nickel
lu
1.1
0.98u
0.99u
1.2
1.2
0.99u
0.98u
0.98u
0.99u
0.99u
0.99u
1.1
Selenium
0.5u
0.5u
0.49u
0.49u
0.5u
0.5u
0.49u
0.49u
0.49u
0.5u
0.5u
0.49u
0.5u
Silver
0.5u
0.5u
0.49u
0.49u
0.5u
0.5u
0.49u
0.49u
0.49u
0.5u
0.5u
0.49u
0.5u
Thallium
0.25u
0.25u
0.25u
0.25u
0.25u
0.25u
0.25u
0.24u
0.24u
0.25u
0.25u
0.25u
0.25u
Total Mercury
0.048u
0.048u
0.046u
0.046u
0.049u
0.048u
0.048u
0.048u
0.048u
0.046u
0.048u
0.046u
0.046u
Zinc
2.7
4.6
2.9
4.3
7.3
9.6
2.9
2.8
2.4
2.4
1.7
3
5.4
u - Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. The number is the minimum quantitation limit.
-------
BRUNSWICK ¦ ¦ ' Tif! ' , m
Table C2. Sediment Extractables Analyses - Brunswick ODMDS, May 2006.
(concentrations reported as ug/kg dry weight)
BO
1
BO
2
BO
3
BO
4
BO
5
BO
6
BO
7
B08
B09
B09D
BIO
Bll
B12
2-Methylnaphthalene
18
18
18
17
18
18
17
18
17
18
17
17
18
Acenaphthene
9.4
9.2
9.4
9.2
9.5
9.6
9.2
9.5
9.2
9.4
9.1
9.1
9.6
Acenaphthylene
9.3
9.1
9.3
9.1
9.4
9.5
9.1
9.3
9.1
9.3
9
9
9.5
Anthracene
8.4
8.3
8.4
8.2
8.5
8.6
8.2
8.4
8.2
8.4
8.1
8.2
8.6
Benzo(a)anthracene
8.4
8.3
8.4
8.2
8.5
8.6
8.2
8.4
8.2
8.4
8.1
8.2
8.6
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
9.2
9
9.1
9
9.2
9.4
9
9.2
8.9
9.2
8.8
8.9
9.4
Benzo(ghi)Perylene
8.4
8.3
8.4
8.2
8.5
8.6
8.2
8.4
8.2
8.4
8.1
8.2
8.6
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
8.4
8.3
8.4
8.2
8.5
8.6
8.2
8.4
8.2
8.4
8.1
8.2
8.6
Benzo-a-Pyrene
8.4
8.3
8.4
8.2
8.5
8.6
8.2
8.4
8.2
8.4
8.1
8.2
8.6
Chrysene
8.4
8.3
8.4
8.2
8.5
8.6
8.2
8.4
8.2
8.4
8.1
8.2
8.6
Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene
8.9
8.8
8.9
8.7
9
9.1
8.7
9
8.7
8.9
8.6
8.6
9.1
Fluoranthene
8.4
8.3
8.4
8.2
8.5
8.6
8.2
8.4
8.2
8.4
8.1
8.2
8.6
Fluorene
8.4
8.3
8.4
8.2
8.5
8.6
8.2
8.4
8.2
8.4
8.1
8.2
8.6
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)Pyrene
8.4
8.3
8.4
8.2
8.5
8.6
8.2
8.4
8.2
8.4
8.1
8.2
8.6
Naphthalene
22
22
22
22
22
23
22
22
22
22
22
22
23
Phenanthrene
8.4
8.3
8.4
8.2
8.5
8.6
8.2
8.4
8.2
8.4
8.1
8.2
8.6
Pyrene
14
13
14
13
14
14
13
14
13
14
13
13
14
NOTE: all values were "U" flagged (analyte not detected at or above reporting limit.. .the number is the minimum quantitation limit.)
* Numbers in bold and italic type exceeded the target detection limit.
-------
BRUNSWICK ¦ ¦ ' Tif! ' , m
Table C3. Sediment PCB/Pesticides Analyses - Branswick ODMDS, May 2006.
(concentrations reported as ug/kg, dry weight)
B01
B02
B03
B04
B05
B06
B07
B08
B09
B09D
B10
Bll
B12
4,4'-DDD (p,p'-DDD)
1
1.1
1
0.99
1
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
0.97
1.6
1
4,4'-DDE (p,p'-DDE)
0.4
0.49
0.4
0.46
0.48
0.41
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.39
0.46
0.65
4,4'-DDT (p,p'-DDT)
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.6
1.6
1.7
1.3
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.4
1.5
1.6
Aldrin
4
3.9
4
3.9
4
4.1
4
4
4
4
3.9
3.9
4.2
alpha-BHC
4
3.9
4
3.9
4
4.1
4
4
4
4
3.9
3.9
4.2
alpha-Chlordane 12
4
3.9
4
3.9
4
4.1
4
4
4
4
3.9
3.9
4.2
beta-BHC
4
3.9
4
3.9
4
4.1
4
4
4
4
3.9
3.9
4.2
cis-Nonachlor /2
4
3.9
4
3.9
4
4.1
4
4
4
4
3.9
3.9
4.2
delta-BHC
4
3.9
4
3.9
4
4.1
4
4
4
4
3.9
3.9
4.2
Dieldrin
0.4
0.39
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.41
0.54
0.54
0.4
0.4
0.44
0.39
0.42
Endosulfan I (alpha)
4
3.9
4
3.9
4
4.1
4
4
4
4
3.9
3.9
4.2
Endosulfan II (beta)
10
9.9
10
9.9
10
10
9.9
10
9.9
10
9.7
9.8
10
Endosulfan Sulfate
10
9.9
10
9.9
10
10
9.9
10
9.9
10
9.7
9.8
10
Endrin
10
9.9
10
9.9
10
10
9.9
10
9.9
10
9.7
9.8
10
Endrin Ketone
10
9.9
10
9.9
10
10
9.9
10
9.9
10
9.7
9.8
10
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
4
3.9
4
3.9
4
4.1
4
4
4
4
3.9
3.9
4.2
gamma-Chlordane /2
4
3.9
4
3.9
4
4.1
4
4
4
4
3.9
3.9
4.2
Heptachlor
4
3.9
4
3.9
4
4.1
4
4
4
4
3.9
3.9
4.2
Heptachlor Epoxide
4
3.9
4
3.9
4
4.1
4
4
4
4
3.9
3.9
4.2
Methoxychlor
20
20
20
20
20
21
20
20
20
20
19
20
21
Toxaphene
40
39
40
39
40
41
40
40
40
40
39
39
42
trans-Nonachlor /2
4
3.9
4
3.9
4
4.1
4
4
4
4
3.9
3.9
4.2
PCB Congener #8
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
0.97
0.98
1
PCB Congener #18
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
0.97
0.98
1
PCB Congener #28
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
0.97
0.98
1
PCB Congener #44
1
1.5
1
0.99
1
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
0.97
0.98
1
PCB Congener #49
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
0.97
0.98
1
PCB Congener #52
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
0.97
0.98
1
PCB Congener #66
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
0.97
0.98
1
PCB Congener #77
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
0.97
0.98
1
PCB Congener #87
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
0.97
0.98
1
PCB Congener #101
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
0.97
0.98
1
-------
BRUNSWICK ¦ ¦ ' Tif! ' , m
Table C3. Continued.
PCB Congener #105
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
0.97
0.98
1
PCB Congener #118
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
0.97
0.98
1
PCB Congener #126
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
0.97
0.98
1
PCB Congener #128
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
0.97
0.98
1
PCB Congener #138
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
0.97
0.98
1
PCB Congener #153
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
0.97
0.98
1
PCB Congener #156
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
0.97
0.98
1
PCB Congener #169
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
0.97
0.98
1
PCB Congener #170
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
0.97
0.98
1
PCB Congener #180
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
0.97
0.98
1
PCB Congener #183
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
0.97
0.98
1
PCB Congener #184
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
0.97
0.98
1
PCB Congener #187
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
0.97
0.98
1
PCB Congener #195
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
0.97
0.98
1
PCB Congener #206
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
0.97
0.98
1
PCB Congener #209
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
1
0.99
1
0.99
1
0.97
0.98
1
NOTE: all values were "U" flagged (analyte not detected at or above reporting limit.. .the number is the minimum quantitation
limit.)
*Numbers in bold and italic type exceeded the target detection limit.
-------
BRUNSWICK '" ' ¦ : ' '¦ ¦ Ti ' , M
Table C4. Sediment Dioxin Analyses - Branswick ODMDS, May 2006.
(concentrations are reported in ng/kg)
B01
B04
B07
B12
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzodioxin
0.03u
0.035u
0.047u
0.087u
Tetrachlorodibenzodioxin (Total)
0.03u
0.39
0.11
1.5
1,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzodioxin
0.035u
0.047u
0.23u
0.32u
Pentachlorodibenzodioxin (Total)
0.26
1.1
0.23u
3.9
1,2,3,4,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzodioxin
0.047u
O.llu
0.25u
0.31u
1,2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzodioxin
0.046u
0.13u
0.26u
0.52u
1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexachlorodibenzodioxin
0.068u
0.26u
0.26u
0.77u
Hexachlorodibenzodioxin (Total)
1.5
7.6
2.3
22
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Heptachlorodibenzodioxin
0.85u
3.7
2.7
9.9
Heptachlorodibenzodioxin (Total)
2.7
13
5.6
33
Octachlorodibenzodioxin
7.5
41
16
120
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzofuran
0.14u
0.14u
0.12u
0.18u
Tetrachlorodibenzofuran (Total)
0.25
0.29
0.12
0.44
1,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran
0.023u
0.037u
0.091u
0.099u
2,3,4,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran
0.049u
0.056u
0.089u
0.19u
Pentachlorodibenzofuran (Total)
0.11
0.16
0.09u
0.32
1,2,3,4,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
0.034u
0.041u
0.17u
0.16u
1,2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
0.03 lu
0.026u
0.16u
0.13u
1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
0.047u
0.046u
0.24u
0.22u
2,3,4,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
0.033u
0.037u
0.18u
0.15u
Hexachlorodibenzofuran (Total)
0.15
0.36
0.18
0.34
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Heptachlorodibenzofuran
0.12u
0.23u
0.4u
0.51u
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-Heptachlorodibenzofuran
0.067u
0.055u
0.3u
0.58u
Heptachlorodibenzofuran (Total)
0.12
0.5
0.76
0.51
Octachlorodibenzofuran
0.33u
0.48u
1.2u
1.5u
Avian Toxic. Equiv. Value, TEQ-98
0.28
0.34
0.62
0.98
Fish Toxic. Equiv. Value,TEQ-98
0.14
0.2
0.55
0.78
Mammalian Toxic. Equiv. Value, TEQ-98
0.15
0.23
0.52
0.87
u - Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. The number is the minimum quantitation limit.
-------
BRUNSWICK '" ' ¦ : ' '¦ ¦ Ti ' , M
APPENDIX D
Water Quality/CTD/Water Chemistry - Metals, Extractables, Pesticides, PCBs and Dioxins
-------
BRUNSWICK '" ' ¦ : ' '¦ ¦ Ti ' , M
Table Dl. Water Metals Analyses - Branswick ODMDS, May 2006
(concentrations reported as ug/L; except Lead - mg/L)
Top
Bottom
Aluminum
86
60
Antimony
2.5u
2.5u
Arsenic
12
15
Beryllium
1.2u
1.2u
Cadmium
1.2u
1.2u
Chromium
7u
6.9u
Copper
8.4
8.4
Iron
O.lu
0.1 lu
Lead
2.5u
2.5u
Manganese
5.5u
5u
Nickel
2.5u
2.5u
Selenium
16u
lOu
Silver
1.2u
1.2u
Thallium
2.5u
2.5u
Total Mercury
0.2u
0.2u
Zinc
13u
17u
u - Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. The number is the minimum quantitation limit.
Table D2. Water Extractables Analyses - Brunswick ODMDS, May 2006.
(concentrations are reported as ug/L)
BR top
BR bottom
2-Methylnaphthalene
10
10
Acenaphthene
10
10
Acenaphthylene
10
10
Anthracene
10
10
Benzo(a)anthracene
10
10
Benzo(b)Fluoranthene
10
10
Benzo(ghi)Perylene
10
10
Benzo(k)Fluoranthene
10
10
Benzo-a-Pyrene
10
10
Chrysene
10
10
Dibenzo(a,h)Anthracene
10
10
Fluoranthene
10
10
Fluorene
10
10
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)Pyrene
10
10
Naphthalene
10
10
Phenanthrene
10
10
Pyrene
10
10
NOTE: all values were "U"flagged (analyte not detected at or above reporting
limit...
the number is the minimum quantitation limit.)
-------
BRUNSWICK '" ' ¦ : ' '¦ ¦ Ti ' , M
Table D3. Water Pesticides/PCBs Analyses - Branswick ODMDS, May 2006
(concentrations reported as ug/L)
top
bottom
4,4'-DDD (p,p'-DDD)
0.05
0.051
4,4'-DDE (p,p'-DDE)
0.02
0.02
4,4'-DDT (p,p'-DDT)
0.076
0.051
Aldrin
0.022
0.02
alpha-BHC
0.02
0.02
alpha-Chlordane 12
0.02
0.02
beta-BHC
0.02
0.02
cis-Nonachlor 12
0.02
0.02
delta-BHC
0.02
0.02
Dieldrin
0.022
0.02
Endosulfan I (alpha)
0.02
0.02
Endosulfan II (beta)
0.05
0.051
Endosulfan Sulfate
0.05
0.051
Endrin
0.05
0.051
Endrin Ketone
0.05
0.051
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
0.02
0.02
gamma-Chlordane 12
0.02
0.02
Heptachlor
0.02
0.02
Heptachlor Epoxide
0.02
0.02
Methoxychlor
0.11
0.1
Toxaphene
2
2
trans-Nonachlor 12
0.02
0.02
PCB Congener #8
0.02
0.016
PCB Congener #18
0.02
0.016
PCB Congener #28
0.02
0.016
PCB Congener #44
0.02
0.016
PCB Congener #49
0.02
0.016
PCB Congener #52
0.02
0.016
PCB Congener #66
0.02
0.016
PCB Congener #77
0.02
0.016
PCB Congener #87
0.02
0.016
PCB Congener #101
0.02
0.016
PCB Congener #105
0.02
0.016
PCB Congener #118
0.02
0.016
PCB Congener #126
0.02
0.016
PCB Congener #128
0.02
0.016
PCB Congener #138
0.02
0.016
PCB Congener #153
0.02
0.016
PCB Congener #156
0.02
0.016
PCB Congener #169
0.02
0.016
PCB Congener #170
0.02
0.016
PCB Congener #180
0.02
0.016
PCB Congener #183
0.02
0.016
PCB Congener #184
0.02
0.016
-------
BRUNSWICK '" ' ¦ : ' '¦ ¦ Ti ' , M
PCB Congener #187
0.02
0.016
PCB Congener #195
0.02
0.016
PCB Congener #206
0.02
0.016
PCB Congener #209
0.02
0.016
NOTE: all values were "U"flagged (analyte not detected at or above reporting
limit...
the number is the minimum quantitation limit.)
Table D4. Bottom Water Dioxin Analyses - Brunswick ODMDS, May 2006
(concentrations reported as pg/L)
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzodioxin
0.00094u
Tetrachlorodibenzodioxin (Total)
0.00041u
1,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzodioxin
O.OOlu
Pentachlorodibenzodioxin (Total)
O.OOlu
1,2,3,4,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzodioxin
0.00042u
1,2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzodioxin
0.00048u
1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexachlorodibenzodioxin
0.00036u
Hexachlorodibenzodioxin (Total)
0.00042u
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Heptachlorodibenzodioxin
0.001
Heptachlorodibenzodioxin (Total)
0.0022
Octachlorodibenzodioxin
0.0074u
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzofuran
O.OOOlu
Tetrachlorodibenzofuran (Total)
0.001
1,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran
0.002u
2,3,4,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran
0.0021u
Pentachlorodibenzofuran (Total)
0.0045
1,2,3,4,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
0.0029
1,2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
0.003 lu
1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
0.0018u
2,3,4,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran
0.002
Hexachlorodibenzofuran (Total)
0.022
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-Heptachlorodibenzofuran
0.019
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-Heptachlorodibenzofuran
0.0074
Heptachlorodibenzofuran (Total)
0.048
Octachlorodibenzofuran
0.073
Avian Toxic. Equiv. Value, TEQ-98
57
Fish Toxic. Equiv. Value,TEQ-98
0.0046
Mammalian Toxic. Equiv. Value, TEQ-98
0.0045
u - Analyte not detected at or above reporting limit. The number is the minimum quantitation limit.
-------
BRUNSWICK '" ' ¦ : ' '¦ ¦ Ti ' , M
APPENDIX E
Benthic Data Extracted from Vittor, 2006.
-------
BRUNSWICK '" ' ¦ : ' '¦ ¦ Ti ' , M
Tabfe 1 CMimmaOT of overall abundance of major faeiittee macroinfauna} taxonomic
groups for the Brunswick ODMDS stations, May 2.006.
Total No. Total No,
Taxa Taxa fV Total Individuals % Total
Inneiiaa
Oliecchaeta i
Po'iychaeta i
[¦: Ll.i: :¦ ri
Bivaivia i
Gastropoda i
uiiiropofia i
Malacostrsca i
Gitrjoor.ri
ichicccennau i
Eohinoitiea
Ophiurcidea i
1
ft
21
10
40
1
Total
1
1
3x
1L
172
0.6
4; 3
12.2
5.8
233
0.6
10
109
2,1
L?2o
1
6.4
261
4,445
0.2
2.5
0.5
29,8
0.0
in
5.9
-------
BRUNSWICK = ¦ ¦ ¦' , 1 ' ' M -,®S
Table 2. Summary of abundance of major bentliie macroinfauiial taxonamic groups
by station for the Biunswkh stations, May 2906.
Total No. Total Mo,
Station Taxa T.'i.va f\ Total Total
br-: Ai:.nfIk.": :: 4-- ..i :•
Mollmsca 4 14.8 19 13.8
Arftrcfoda 9 33 3 81 5S.7
Echinodermata 0 C.O 0 0.0'
Other Tax* 2 7.4 9 6.5
Total 27 138
BR02 Annelid?. 44 57 1 34S 71.6
Mollusc a 9 11.7 13 2.7
Ardiropoda 17 22 1 68 14.0
Eehinodennata i 1.3 IS 3.7
Other Tana 6 7\S 39 S.O
Total 77 486
BR03 Ai;;ielid?, 23 42.0 127 -4-0.9
Mollusoa 9 16.7 15 5.5
Ardiropoda 17 31 5 115 42.4
Echinodermata 1 1.9 1 0,4
Other Tax a 4 7,4 13 4.3
'Total 54 271
BR04 Ai::ielicb. 29 56 Q 3S7 4S.0
Molksea - 7.S 11 1.4
Ardiropoda 13 25 5 3SS 48.1
Echmodermata 1 2.0 2 0.2
Other Tax a 4 7,5 IS 2.2
Total 51 806
BR05 Annelida 1 52.5 545 90.5
Mollr.jca 2.5 3 0.5
Ardiropoda 11 27.5 39 6.5
Echinodermata 0 0.0 0 0 0
Othei Taxa 7 17 5 15 2.5
Total 40 602
BRQo Annelid?. 14 46.7 140 6c>.4
Mollusea 2 0.7 2 0.9
Ar±ropoda 8 26.7 53 25.1
EcMnodermita 1 3.3 1 0.5
Other Tax a 5 16 7 15 7 1
Total JO 211
-------
BRUNSWICK = ¦ ¦ ¦' , 1 ' ' M -,®S
Table 2 continued:
Total No. Total No.
Station Taxa Taxa cc Total Individuals Total
BR07 Annelida 13 41S 72 39.3
Mollusea S 16.1 10 5.5
Arthropods 9 29 0 £4 45.9
Echiaoderniara I 3.2 1 0 5
Other Tasa 3 Q.7 16 8.7
Total 31 183
BROS Annelida 20 40 3 156 5o.O
Mollusea 10 20 4 13 -2
Aidnopoda 15 30 c 245 50.6
Eeilnodenmta 0 0.0 0 0.0
Other Taxa 4 SJ 14 3.2
Total 49 -133
BR09 Annelid?. IS 43 6 130 49,2
Mollusea 5 13 5 9 3 4
Ardiropoda 10 27 C 112 42.4
Eeknodenuaca 0 0.0 0 0.0
Othei Taxa - 10 3 13 -9
Total 37 264
BRIO Annelida 23 53 5 74 34.1
Mollusea 5 ll.b 11 5.1
Ardiropoda 9 20,9 66 30.4
Echiiioderruara 3 7.0 40 IS.4
Other Taxa 3 7A 2o 12,0
Total 43 217
BR11 Annelid i 21 51 2 265 74.1
Mollusea - 9.S 7 19
Ardiropoda 11 26 8 68 IS. 7
EeMnodennata 1 2.4 3 O.S
Other Taxa 4 9_S 16 -4.4
Total 41 363
BR12 Annelida 13 62 3 376 79.8
Mollusea 7 13 2 12 2.5
Ardiropoda 4 7.5 S 1.7
Ecbiaoderaw.ta 3 5.7 S 17
Other Taxa 5 11.3 67 14.2
Total 53 471
-------
mumwic ¦ ' ^ ¦ : m
-------
mumwtcK - - ¦ '.. ¦ • ¦ m m
TaMe 4. Distribmticmi ami abundance aftwmfcic nHcttanfaimal taa lor the static*. inside the BninswkfcODMZiS sits,
April 2006.
N 5. of
Pli'lum Class Individual?
At.
Folv
31.?
31.95
13C
Oxywostybi smirhi
¦ti
Ma]s
224
11.60
-3.55
6
IDC
.Pmmkawaerixs sp. B
Art
Mais
in
-9.3C
5
S3
JMfeMBtHT PH)
Air.
Folv
So
4.40
53.7 C
5
S3
Tharyx mm
Ann
Foly
es
3.57
5~.2S
6
IX
Kbynduxoeia {LPIL)
Fir
-
e:
1,4
CC "5
6
130
Maatimm irapakit
.Art
Ma3s
r
C3.5-
5
£3
Xftepoxymus kkhont
Art
Mala
Id?
2--
5
S3
Qpbiiwaiifea. (LPIL)
Sri:
Oph:
r-j
- 5
es.5"
4
CK
Plmnsmis {LPIL)
7lo
-
"1 '3
"0.9C
2
33-
Sfmeskm trioetBam
Art
Mali
l."Q
^2M
4
07
EMdev'tsmpits hmtimmm
Art
Mala
32
1.^0
7-.31
4
t'
Omtuafiaifarms
Air.
Folv
31
l.D
75.92
6
130
PhjMoiom (LPIL)
Air.
Folv
23
1.1P
77.11
6
no
Msmirmi (LPIL)
.Art
Mala
. r
7S 0-
4
C7
Pofyciwus exsmus
Air.
Folv
::
0..-3
73.97
4
£7
Spiepkams wnssivnmsis
A-r.
Folv
0./3
75.91
1
?! '"J
Mugslam. sp. H
A'IT.
Folv
i?
O.iZ
SO JV
1
27
Phyltodoce araute
Air.
Folv
::
Q.il
si.eT
i
IDC
Prionospio erittata
Air
Folv
*« 7
O.it
82,55
4
07
Apopritmospio dayi
Air.
Foly
" <-
0. Z 3
S3.3S
5
S3
THbularats (LPIL)
F.bv
Anep
0.2
s-.:i
4
tj7
Balea mlitsrimmsh
Art
} laJa
M ~
.
S-,93
1
17
Meiiommtta ambima
A\i
Foly
1-
y."
S3
2
33
AeSniaria (LPIL)
£ri
An-ii
•* t
0. D.
St.2 5
6
DC
MMten sittit\-anum
Art
Mak
:c
0.5.
~i
3
50
Spio ptttibtmtm
Air.
Folv
:c
0.5
S~ 31
3
5C
Magelmm pqpi&icorms
Am
Folv
r
0.4
S"3
4
e7
CiriatiiMae (LPIL)
Ann
Folv
£
0.4
SMC
3
5C
Nepktys pieta
Air.
Folv
i
0.4
ES.el
5
S3
IMIi'ss iris
Mol
Biva
I
0.4
85.32
¦s
33
livah'ia (LHL)
Mol
33 :va
¦
OJQ
8C.3S
3
5C
Crassitulla Imrmhiia
:.:>i
Elvs
T
0.3 fc
3975
2
33
Cfyctra (LPIL)
At.
F oly
•7
0.3 s
SO. 11
33
liiaa (LPIL)
Mol
Biva
T
0.36
PC.-T
-
e7
TkhifidAie (LPIL)
At.
OLs
~
0.3&
9C.S3
3
5C
Brmtvkimtemm QJOTLJ
Cbc
Lept
;•
0.3
91.:-+
1
~
Cjatiiira poiita
Art
Mak
5
0 1
91 -c
1
17
PhjBodoee -mucosa
Air.
Folv
0.3
91""
¦"1
33
Acamtofomtorius imtirmeims
Art
Mais
o.:d
P2.CZ
T
33
NemiMsim (LPIL)
At
Foly
5
o.;o
o
33
Pelydora esmMta
Air.
F oly
'j
O.Zo
92 5-
i
5C
Se?lmsya vftan
Moi
5 LVa
O.Zo
92.SC
l
¦9 T
Amphratidae (LPIL}
A".""
F.-l-
4
0.2
93,01
3
5C
Eumula saaigumm
Air.
Foly
4
0.2
93 22
3
5C
Oasttopoia (LPIL)
Mol
4
0.2
93.-2
3
5C
Owptos ertmita scmiata.
Air.
F :4-
4
0.2
93.6?
4
67
Potygadius |,LPIL)
Am
Folv
4
0.2
93.3-
T
33-
Scsfekpii mam
Air.
Folv
4
0.2
9- 0-
5C
Sptonidae (LPIL)
Air.
Folv
4
0.2
9-.25
3
5C
Tellinictae (LHL)
\.:-a
3:vs
4
0.2
9-.-C
33
Argissa hameaipes
Art
M.-U.'.
3
0.1
;
9~Cl
i
i ~
Calypoaetdae (LHL)
I.Sol
C"iS3t
3
O.io
p_,.
¦t
33-
-------
BRUNSWICK = ¦ ¦ ¦' , 1 ' ' M -,®S
Table 4 continued:
Tsna
PbyUim
CLm
No, of
IndhlcliuL
ft Tot.il
C umtilative
¦'t
Station
OccisM'tncs
ft Station
Occurrence
tyetaspis prnsmlma
Art
i-ms
•i
0.10
9- 92
2
33
Gemiadtdts mmiimae
Air.
C '
¦i
0.16
95.""
1
1 i
Hcuoioda* (LPIL)
Air,
Fol..'
X
0.16
95.2-
1
\ 1
iseneflnJiiiffi (LPIL)
Mol
31 vs
i
0.16
95 39
2
33
Paraprionospio pnoata
Air.
Folv
i
0.1S
95.55
1
¦» T
TUrtwUaria (LPIL)
?b
Turb
¦:s
0.1D
95."T
2
33
Abra stfusfe
Mol
Br.\i
0.13
95.81
1
' 7
AmphliiddM (LPIL)
Ed:
Opb:
0.15
95.91
1
11
AiaswmyiUi ftartnxmae
Ait,
Foly
0.13
9c SI
7*
33
Ervilia concentrica
Y. ol
Biva
0.13
9* .12
1
\ ~
Fimbmosikemlais (LPIL)
Am
Fnlv
0.13
So 22
1
l"'
Q>f€«i
Air,
Folv
0.13
9c 32
1
' ~
GmM fittorta
Air
Foly
0.13
90.-3
33
Hotaniiaroidei (LfJL)
cch
Hole
0.13
9c 53
i
2 7
Listritlla immmii
Art
M»:i
0.13
9t 93
i
\ ~
Mtdiomasms califirrmtnsis
Ann
Folv
0.10
9t
i
] 7
Metmms maemlMia
Air,
Foly
0.13
91 S4
i
^ ¦
Mmrs atrepos
Ecb
Hcln
0.13
9c 9-i
i
t n
Afereis micromma
Ait.
Folv
0.13
9" 05
i
l~
Notomastus latericeiis
Air.
F oh'
0.13
9".15
i
j "1
Omipltkfae {LPIL.)
Ait.
Foly
0.13
9" 2C'
i
^ 7
Apw (LPIL)
Art
Mil.'.
0.13
9T,3t
2
33
PammmopeMs cjjnis
-An
M*U
0.13
9".-C
1
i 7
Paiampbirome sp. B
Att.
Foly
0.13
9^ 57
2
33
tka&mria gmkiii
Ait.
Folv
0.13
9" c:
1
Poec&ochaetw jahnssni
A it.
Foly
0.13
9" "
1
¦j ~
Prionospio (LPIL)
At.
Foly
0.13
q- S3
2
33
SmgiBa (LPIL)
Mol
Bra
0.13
9".9S
1
IT
TMmMu {LPIL)
:.:-a
C-iM
0.13
9S.33
1
1"
ffiit-wla (LHL)
.Art
Mais
0.13
9; :s
7»
33
Aglaspflamai verriBi
A'
Foly
1
0.05
93
I
17
Aomdes wmjmgmyemm
At.
Foly
1
0.05
93.29
1
ii
Bakmtj'glossm (LPIL)
Hem
Erne
1
0.05
9S.3-1
1
1"
Batkypmma (LPIL)
.Art
JMi
1
0.05
9 E .39
1
n
BathypoKia parieri.
Art
Mala
1
0.05
9;.-5
1
Cafyptrmm caaraHs
Mol
C-Sit
1
0.05
9S.5C
1
' 7
CapiteOa (LPIL)
Air.
Foly
1
0.05
93,55
1
• "7
Carfiitfae (LPIL)
Mol
B ra
1
0.05
93 ec
1
Cyciaspis various
Art
Mala
I
0.05
92 f5
1
1 ~T
Diplodoma (LEJL)
Mol
3IV5
1
0.05
93 "1
1
17
Bipsfydsra soaaiis
Air,
Folv
1
0.05
93 ^
1
i"
fifctfs triloba
Art
Mala
1
0.05
93.81
1
Emmrs mipmia
Art
Mali
1
r> ft
93 8C
1
J "
fiu'sritrffa emsmyi
.Art
Cm
1
0.05
93.91
1
~r-
Hydmzoa (LPIL)
cm
Hytfc
1
0.05
93 PC
1
'"1
Lritoscolepka (LPIL,)
Air.
Foly
I
0.05
9*3.02
1
!! ~
Lkcbu (LPIL)
Mot
Bra
1
M M*I
99 0-
1
IT
lambrineTis haretBf
Ait,
Folv
1
0.05
99
1
Ii -
Lyomisi fcjaliaa
J. Sol
Bra
1
0.05
99.1"
1
' ~
Mactrajrugilis
Mol
Bra
1
0.05
99 22
1
17
MkmpMMslitms Hartmame
Air.
Foly
1
0.05
99.27
1
i"
.Massitrim vtim
Mol
Cr.V>!
1
0.05
99 33
1
17
Sswinii sp A
Air.
Foly
1
0.05
99 3S
1
Ojphiofepii elegams
Hch
Opto:
1
0.05
99.-3
1
Pandora (LPIL}
Mol
Br.'a
1
0.05
99 -S
1
's ~
Wnto (LPIL)
Art
Mala
1
0.05
99.53
1
Ti "r
Polwwiiae {LPIL)
Air.
Folv
1
0.05
99.59
1
5 7
-------
BRUNSWICK '" ' ¦ : ' '¦ ¦ Ti ' , M
TaMe 4 continued:
So, of
C unmli rlv*
Station
flr Station
Tasa
Phylum
CLi '>>
XadMdiufls %
Occurrence
Occurrence
Proctiia (LPXL)
Ait
MaJs
1 0.05
pc e->
1
"li 7
Seahplm (LPIL>
At.
F^ly
1 0.0:
pc.ec
1
"!! 7
Sipnncnla {LPILJ
Sip
-
1 o.os
9£ "•+
1
1"
Sekm riridis
;.:k
Bivj
1 0.05
PS 7C
1
17
Ai".
E slv
1 COS
PC .8-
1
"i "
Smmbipnim Mimmms
Mr4
1 0.05
pc PC
1
7
Tuctmstka jssitfta
C-a»r
1 0.05
95.95
1
"!! 7
Ihtctg&eMms d-PELi
Alt
Mais
1 0.05
103 3C
1
* 7
Taut Key
AtmtAnnelii
£Big=s01igoei,aeta
Pohr=Potwte'a
AitsAitimjpoda
Mal3=MalacoEtraca
QsttsQstxseodi
CMo=Ci™daa
Lepi^Leptoranfia
CnisCnidaiia
AMti^Antiiozoia
Hy»
Ecl=EcMno^fiixBila.
&M=EeMi%Qi.dfia
Hclo=Holtt!liiiioisJfia
Gpte=©pMiiraiicfea
HemsHemtchaniata
En»=£Tuei^pnE'iisn
MoI=MoIlasca
Biva^Brvatvia
CastsaGistnpodi
Elio=PkxD»u.da
Ha=Pi2tj'lielinintlies
"tab=Twbdlaiia.
Rhy=d&yiKli0C'oela
Anop=Anopla
Sip=Sipttncala
-------
BRUNSWICK = ¦ ¦ ¦' , 1 ' ' M -,®S
Table 5. Dittn'xnm aid dsndaice of tatttric itaeraMauiial taxi for lie stations ootsiie flie Bninswict GBMB5 site,
April 230t.
No, of C umuiaiive Str-tLon ;'V Station
Tisa
PiiylULTl
C ln;=..
I^ilivicualv
Tot,a]
'•V
Occurresioe
Occurrence
: I'C\
Ar.n
« "S""V
1?.::
31
.;
.V/, .-;:; .LPI"_
Al',H
Polv
jo:
12 Cl
31 S2
4
fc7
Am
Poly
2.23
36
4
67
Memtwm fropaMs
Mai's
is:
7 "'-t
47 50
4
Qxywostylis smisM
Mala
r:
"".iji
54 34
6
:co
TJimyx acutiu
Ara
Poly
135
•iJ3
53 63
4
h~
ProtokauMorim sp. B
Ait
Maia
S6
3.42
e: 05
5
50
MeMiirm. triocettatus
Ait
Mala
¦*?
3.14
t5
5
50
(hvmiajMsiformis
AlVJ
Poly
56
2.13
-3
5
10D
Rhyncbocoela (LPIL)
3J.1V
-
5s
2.23
t? 65
6
103
Baim catharinensis
A::
Mala
-itli
1.59
"¦1 24
33
Rlsepoxymim Mtdimi
A::
Mala
39
1.55
"2
4.
67
PkyBodoce arcme
Ann
?Olv
35
1.39
74
5
50
Prionospw psifmsi
Am
Polv
35
1.3?
33
Memtinn (LPIL)
A::
Mala
34
1,35
7-> 93
17
Polyoma amim
Ann
Poly
'1C
C.S9
77 92
33
GpMiiroidea (LPIL)
Eela
Q?M
¦* -
C.3S
^5 SO
4
€7
S-mlelepis tsmim
Am
Pol'--
1 "
c.:s
"¦9 67
3
50
Ctaatoliiae (LPIL)
•to
?0lv
Is
A 7^
?'j 39
"S
33
Polyoma (LP3L)
Am
Polv
:_
C.6S
SI 3"
i
17
SpiocMete-pmm octtlams
Am
Polv
17
C.6S
si 74
6
100
Pofyg orMm (LPIL)
Am
Poly
IS
C.6-
S2.52
-
67
TSiMiamas (LPIL)
Rliv
li
S3 02
4
67
Cyclaspa pustulam
Ar.
Mala
15
3.63
S3 61
4
r
Eiotia triloba
Ait
Mala
15
C.60
84 21
4
Qmtiplm ermita oculata
Am
Poly
15
C.63
S4S1
5
01s
U-?
Biralvia {LHL)
Mci
Biva
13
A i" "V,
U._ _
S5 32
5
50
Americhemm ancrictsmm
Ait
Mala
::
C.4S
S5 SO
-
Ampharete sp. B
Am
Polv
1:
C.4S
SS 2;
3;
Magelota papittitvmii
Aria
?Olv
::
C.4S
S6 7;
5
50
Notmmsus Isimeou
Ara
Poly
10
3.43
S7 15
i
1"
Pboranis (LPIL)
Fits
-
10
3.43
PT
W ' J-1
4
FtosncepMidlae (LPIL)
Alt
Mala
10
3.43
S7 95
"V
33
PfiyUfflfoar (LPDL)
Am
Polv
id
3.43
8S 35
5
50
Prionospio aistata
Am
Poll-
10
3.43
c; j '4
5
5C
StrigiUa mimMlis
Mo!
Era
10
«. 1 ^
u'.Hru
89 14
53
TeBifia (LPIL)
Mo]
B.va
10
C.4D
S9 54
5
S:
SpionMai (LPIL)
Ara
?Olv
9
C.38
S9 90
3
50
Teiebellflae (LFJEL)
Am
Poly
9
Z.36
SO 25
¦¦V
33
Actmiaria (LHL)
Cr.;
Ant!:
s
C 32
90 5~
3
50
Goflimfo lisorea
Am
Polv
s
2 32
SO Ss
"i
33
Apvprimmpio tfayi
Am
Poly
7
Z.2S
si
-
67
Emlmmopm honduramts
An
Maia
r- to
si 45
3
50
Ttabellaria (LPIL)
Pis.
Turt
7
C 2S
Si 73
so
Atfaophamus wniil
Am
Polv
6
P
9; 96
33
Diplodmts fLHL)
Mcl
Biva
6
A 4
U ._¦*
S2 20
4
33
Neplitiis pieta
Am
?Olv
6
A T r
92 44
4
67
Ftmwspio (LPIL)
AJMX
Poly
6
2
S2 63
4
33
Sipiineula. (LPIL)
Sip
-
r-
S2 92
4
€7
Spc peaibaneae
Am
Polv
r1-
S3 1<5
4
33
Spiopkaiietmissimmiis
Ana
Poly
C 1--
S3 4i}
50
Tiltim versicolor
Mo]
Biva
C.2-
S3 64
2
33
Bhawaria keteroseta
Ara
Polv
'J
C.23
S3 S3
17
-------
BRUNSWICK = ¦ ¦ ¦' , 1 ' ' M -,®S
Table 5 continued:
Mo, of
Cumiiiflve
Station
% Station
Tasa
Phylum
Clnsi
Inflrviinab
£< Total
Occurrence
Oceorremee
SieMjonw
An
Mala
3
V.-tJ
S4 03
Ji
50
Uagetoaa sp. H
Ai.n
?Olv
5
2.23
54 22
i
17
MmremtipMs xebuima
Ar.n
Polv
S
C.10
94
1
1?
Argism kmsatipes
An
Maia
-
C.lb
54 59
3
50
FmbrUtsthenelais (LPIL)
Ar.3
Polv
-
C.16
54 ¦?;
3
50
Miimmiopim (LPIL)
Am
Polv
•f
C.lfr
54 91
3
50
Mmiocwaphiun tuberculatum
An
Mal3
-
C.16
55 O7
1
17
Prntsttma. gouMii
Ar.:i
Polv
-
C.lb
55 23
2
33
Pimixa PL)
A::
Mal'a
1
C.lfc
55 55
3
50
Polydors cenmia
Arn
Polv
_
c.it
55 54
3
50
Siiaiionidae (LPIL)
.fen
Polv
-
C.lfe
55^0
1
17
Spiophtmts (LPIL)
Ar.:i
Polv
-
C.16
55 56
1
17
teiptetaeMBae (LPIL)
An
Mal'a
5
C.12
55 95
2
33
Cyciaspis various
A::
Mala
3
:.i:
5-3
3
50
Eimmvpm levis
An
Mala
3
C.12
55 22
17
FimbnostheMsMis sp, A
Ar.n
Polv
3
C.12
55 54
2
33
Lticiaiclae (LPIL)
Mil
Bra
3
C.12
Sb J-6
I
17
Nepiayidae (LPIL)
Am
Pol"-'
3
C.12
9b 5J
_
33
Phy&odoce mucosa
Ar.n
Poly
3
C.12
Si70
17
Tekim iris
Mo]
Biva
3
C.12
56 s:
2
33
TWMto (LPIL)
Ara
0122
3
C.12
St) 94
17
AcfliiltoftBiflflniB (LPIL)
Mala
2
C.OS
57 02
17
Ampbaretidae (LPIL,)
Ar,:i
Polv
£
c.os
57 10
2
33
Aridcka (LPIL)
AO
Poly
2
C f'S
57::
I
17
SMIgpsfiefa pmtart
An
Mala
2
c.os
57 26
33
BrmcMostoma (LPIL)
QlJ
Lep:
c.os
57 33
1
17
Cipiieiiiae CLPIL)
Ar.:i
Polv
£
. .'.C
57-H
1
17
Dipotydora sociaiis
.Ar.iT
Polv
c.os
57 45
17
Euceramus praelomgm
An
Maia
J
c.os
57 5"
17
Gastropoda (LPIL)
Mol
Cv.s:
i
c.os
57 65
33
Giyrera (LPIL)
Anil
Poly
2
c.os
57 "3
33
LiiKidae fLPIL.)
Kliy
AM£
2
c.os
57 SI
* •'
Marietta banimli
Al".
Mala
2
c.os
57 S9
33
Malianidae (LPIL)
Ar.n
Poly
_
c.os
57 9"
33
PMsmlsm simwiM
Sip
-
c.os
5S35
33
Hiylloieddae (LPIL)
.to
Polv
2
c.os
53 ;?
53
Spio (LPIL)
Am
Poly
£
c.os
55 21
_
Vncida {LPIL)
Maia
2
c.os
S3 25
i
17
A8r« acq mails
Mol
Biva
c.o-
53 33
i
17
AcanUmlmusiwin-s imerma§ii$
A::
Mala
i
c.o-
S3 3"
17
Mnericamysis isaMia
.-j.:
Mala
i
C.O-
53-1
i
17
AmpeUsm (LPIL)
An
Mala
i
DX
53 45
i
17
Apopritmospio CLE!-}
Am
Poly
i
c.o-
53 -S
i
17
Apxutfes sp. A
An
Maia
i
C.O-i
53 53
i
17
Aimandia maculata
Am
Poly
i
c.o-
53 5"
i
17
Bathyporeia (LPIL)
A::
Mala
i
C.0--
53 41
i
*
Calypraeidae (LPIL)
Mol
C- >.¦. :"
C.O-
53 63
i
. i.
Ctynenefla torquata
Am
Polv
i
C.Oi
53 t-S
i
Corophiidae (LPIL)
Ar.
Mala
C.04
53 73
i
.
Emada smgimea
Ai.:\
Polv
i
C.O-
53^"
i
17
Giyeera sp. E
Am
?0lv
i
C.Cw
53 SI
1
17
Glycexiclae (LPIL)
Am
Poly
i
C.CC
53 Sf
I
17
Haostodiiae (LPIL)
A::
Mal'a
i
c.c^
ssss
1
17
Hec-iotuiaf; LPIL j
Am
Poly
i
o.O-
53 93
1
17
Lvc-nsia hv/\Jma
Mol
Siva
i
C.04
53 9"
I
17
-------
BRUNSWICK = ¦ ¦ ¦' , 1 ' ' M -,®S
Table 5 continued:
laia
No. of C umul.itiTf Station ^Station
Phylum Cte Individuals 'V Total S
1
mmmvam
Mo3
Gk:
1
C.O-r
99 J-C-
1
Pagums (LPIL)
Ar.
Mala
C.C--
99 -4
I
P&amaopctta cypris
Mala
C.C-i
99 J-:
1
Parmphmome sp. B
Ann
Polv
i
C.C'i
99 51
1
ParapkmosyBis Umgiarrata
Ann
Polv
I
c.w
99 56
I
PSfMiffff C8£€@.
Pmctimenes (LPIL)
Am
A"
Polv
Mala
1
C.C-1
C.C4
95.6 C
99 64
I
PettttMHcia Mofiirm
Al'li
Poly
I
C.0-
99 s:
1
Procesm ImnpMIti
A::
Main
I
C.C>-i
99 72
1
SaMlma vulgaris
Aril
Polv
I
C.C'i
99 76
1
Seuieldae (LHL)
Mo]
Bra
I
c
99 SO
1
SoIobjw FCfilfft
Mol
Biva
C.G-
9 9 S4
1
SfraiBSpfwij MMnemgs
Mo.
Go:
C.C'i
99 S.
1
Syllidae (LPIL)
Ar.n
Polv
i
c.o-
99 92
1
Tiaoimtim pmllla
Mai
Gas:
C.C'J-
99 90
1
-
Terebm cancova
Mol
Gk:
i
C.O-i
IOC I'D
1
i"
AiuteAnraliria
Oi.8=OI|octaeia
PolY=Polwli.aeta
Art^rftapoda
Mali=Malaeoss:aca
LepfcsLeptocanfia
nfeCnMaria
AirittaAntbozoa
Ecli=E:ht'.o
-------
BRUNSWICK ODMDS STATUS AND TRENDS - MAY 2006
Figure 3. Abundance of major liiacroin1vertebrate taxa group2 for die Bruiisvick ODMDS stations. 2006.
10°
90
so--^H
70-
60-1
5o-^|
40-
£ 30-1
20-^1
10-1
0 BR01BR02BR03BR^BR05BR06BEj^BROSBR09BR10B^BR12
^^Aimebda
**Molhisca **Ectuitode:naia
^¦(AiTliiopoda I I Misc
¦y
Hi
l
Outside the ODMDS
Inside the ODMDS
-------
BRUNSWICK ¦ ¦ ' Tif! ' , m
Figure 10. Cluster analysis of the Bnaiswdck ODMDS stations, 20CN5.
:o-r
43 —
t
I
S3
-------
BRUNSWICK '" ' ¦ : ' '¦ ¦ Ti ' , M
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
j
-------
BRUNSWICK '" ' ¦ : ' '¦ ¦ Ti ' , M
APPENDIX F
Target Detection Limits
-------
BRUNSWICK '" ' ¦ : ' '¦ ¦ Ti ' , M
ANALYTE
Water
Sediment
ug/L (ppb)
mg/kg (ppm)
Antimony
2.5
2
Arsenic
5
1
Aluminum
500
50
Beryllium
30
0.5
Cadmium
2.5
0.5
Chromium
50
1
Copper*
4.8
1
Iron
500
25
Lead
5
0.5
Manganese
100
1
Mercury
0.2
0.05
Nickel*
74
2
Selenium
10
4
Silver*
1.9
1
Thallium
5
0.5
Zinc*
50
1
Ammonia
0.05
2.5
Nitrate+Nitrite
0.05
12.5
Phosphorus, Total
0.01
25
Phosphorus, Ortho
0.01
25
Sulfate
0.1
1
Sulfide
0.04
0.4
Kjeldahl Nitrogen
0.05
12.5
Total Solids/dry weight
0.01
Total Org. Carbon
5 (0.0005%)
0.001
ANALYTE
Water
Soil/Sed*
ug/L (ppb)
ug/kg(ppb)
2-Methylnaphthalene
10
20
Acenaphthene
10
10
Acenaphthylene
10
20
Anthracene
10
20
Benzo(a)anthracene
10
20
Benzo(a)pyrene
10
20
B enzo (b/k)fluoranthene
10
20
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
10
20
Chrysene
10
20
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
10
20
Fluoranthene
10
20
Fluorene
10
10
Indeno(l,2,3,c,d)pyrene
10
20
Naphthalene
10
20
Phenanthrene
10
20
Pyrene
10
20
-------
BRUNSWICK '" ' ¦ : ' '¦ ¦ Ti ' , M
ANALYTE
Water ua/L(DDb)
Soil/Sed* ua/ka(DDb)
(3- and/or 4-)Methylphenol
10
100
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
10
200
2,4-Dimethylphenol
10
20
2-Methylphenol
10
50
Benzyl Butyl Phthalate
10
200
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
10
200
Di-n-butylpthalate
10
200
Di-n-octylphthalate
10
200
Dibenzofuran
10
200
Diethyl phthalate
10
200
Dimethyl Phthalate
10
200
Hexachlorobenzene
10
200
Hexachlorobutadiene
10
200
Hexachlorocyclopentadien
10
200
C
Hexachloroethane
10
200
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
10
200
Pentachlorophenol
20
100
Phenol
10
100
ANALYTE
Water
Sediment
ug/L (ppb)
ug/kg (ppb)
Aldrin
0.5
20
Heptachlor*
0.05
20
Hept. Epoxide*
0.05
20
alpha-BHC
0.5
20
beta-BHC
0.5
20
gamma-BHC*
0.1
20
delta-BHC
0.5
20
Endosulfan-1*
0.05
20
Dieldrin*
0.5
1
p,p'-DDT*
0.1
2
p,p'-DDD*
0.1
2
p,p'-DDE*
0.1
2
Endrin*
0.05
20
Endosulfan -II*
0.05
20
Endosulfan- S04*
0.5
20
Endrin Ketone
0.5
20
Methoxychlor
1
50
g-chlordane*
0.1
5
a-chlordane*
0.1
5
trans-nonachlor*
0.1
20
cis-nonachlor
0.5
20
Toxaphene*
2
50
PCB (as Congeners - see list)
0.02
1
-------
BRUNSWICK '" ' ¦ : ' '¦ ¦ Ti ' , M
PCB
Water
Sediment
Congenge
ug/L (ppb)
ug/kg (ppb)
r
8
0.02
1
18
0.02
1
28
0.02
1
44
0.02
1
49
0.02
1
52
0.02
1
66
0.02
1
77
0.02
1
87
0.02
1
101
0.02
1
105
0.02
1
118
0.02
1
126
0.02
1
128
0.02
1
138
0.02
1
153
0.02
1
156
0.02
1
169
0.02
1
170
0.02
1
180
0.02
1
183
0.02
1
184
0.02
1
187
0.02
1
195
0.02
1
206
0.02
1
209
0.02
1
Congener
Sediment Target RL (ng/Kg)
Water Target RL (pg/L)
2,3,7,8-TCDD
1
10
1,2,3,7,8-PentaCDD
2.5
50
1,2,3,4,7,8-HexaCDD
5
50
1,2,3,6,7,8-HexaCDD
5
50
1,2,3,7,8,9-HexaCDD
5
50
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HeptaCDD
5
50
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCDD
10
100
2,3,7,8-TetraCDF
1
10
1,2,3,7,8-PentaCDF
2.5
50
2,3,4,7,8-PentaCDF
2.5
50
1,2,3,4,7,8-HexaCDF
5
50
1,2,3,6,7,8-HexaCDF
5
50
1,2,3,7,8,9-HexaCDF
5
50
2,3,4,6,7,8-HexaCDF
5
50
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HeptaCDF
5
50
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HeptaCDF
5
50
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OCDF
10
100
------- |