FINAL
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Harbortown Area Site Characterization Report
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Great Lakes Architect-Engineer Services
Contract: EP-R5-11-10
Preparedfor
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region 5
77 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, Illinois 60604-3507
Prepared by
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology*
5918 Meridian Blvd, Suite 4
Brighton, Michigan 48116
December 2016
Revision: 01
EA Project No. 62561.28
* EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC is affiliated with EA Engineering, Science, and Technology,
Inc., PBC who does business as EA Science and Technology in the State of Michigan.
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page iii
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
LIST OF FIGURES vi
LIST OF TABLES x
LIST 01 ACRONYMS AM) ABBREVIATIONS xi
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-1
ES. 1 SEDIMENT CHEMISTRY RESULTS ES-1
ES.2 EQUILIBRIUM PARTITIONING SEDIMENT BENCHMARK TOXICITY
UNITS AND PROBABLE EFFECTS CONCENTRATION QUOTIENTS ... ES-8
ES.3 SPATIAL ANALYSIS ES-10
ES.4 CONCLUSIONS ES-11
1. INTRODUCTION 1-1
1.1 WORK SCOPE AM) OBJECTIVES 1-1
1.1.1 Proj ect Obj ectives 1-1
1.1.2 Objectives of the Site Characterization Report 1-1
1.2 SITE LOCATION AM) HISTORY 1-1
2. HARBORTOWN AREA SITE INVESTIGATION 2-1
2.1 SAMPLING PROGRAM DESIGN AND RATIONALE 2-1
2.1.1 Sample Locations 2-1
2.1.2 Number of Samples 2-2
2.2 NAVIGATION AND SURVEY 2-2
2.3 SEDIMENT SAMPLING 2-2
2.3.1 Sonic Core Sampling 2-3
2.3.2 Ponar Grab Sampling 2-4
2.3.3 Sediment Core Processing 2-4
2.4 ANALYTICAL PROGRAM 2-5
2.5 SAMPLE HANDLING, CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY, AND QUALITY
ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL 2-6
2.5.1 Sample Handling, Chain-of-Custody, and Documentation 2-6
2.5.2 Quality Control 2-6
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page iv
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
2.6 DECONTAMINATION 2-7
2.7 INVESTIGATION-DERIVED WASTE 2-7
2.8 DEVIATIONS FROM THE QAPP AND FSP 2-7
2.8.1 Sampling Locations 2-7
2.8.2 Sample Recovery 2-8
2.8.3 Sample Processing and Analytical Program 2-8
3. RESULTS 3-1
3.1 DATA EVALUATION 3-1
3.1.1 Comparison to Sediment Quality Guidelines 3-1
3.1.2 Calculation of Total Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Total
Polychlorinated Biphenyls 3-2
3.1.3 Ratio of Simultaneously Extracted Metals to Acid Volatile Sulfide 3-2
3.1.4 Equilibrium Partitioning Sediment Benchmark Toxic Units 3-3
3.1.5 Probable Effects Concentration Quotients 3-4
3.2 RESULTS FROM THE HARBORTOWN AREA SEDIMENT
INVESTIGATION 3-4
3.2.1 S ampl e Recovery 3-4
3.2.2 Lithology 3-5
3.2.3 Bulk Sediment Results 3-6
3.2.3.1 Grain Size, Particle Size, and Density 3-6
3.2.3.2 Ammonia 3-7
3.2.3.3 PCB Aroclors 3-7
3.2.3.4 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons 3-8
3.2.3.5 Total Organic Carbon 3-9
3.2.3.6 Metals 3-10
3.2.3.7 Ratio of Simultaneously Extracted Metals to Acid Volatile
Sulfide 3-18
3.2.3.8 Petroleum Hydrocarbons 3-18
4. EQUILIBRIUM PARTITIONING SEDIMENT BENCHMARKS 4-1
4.1 POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS 4-1
4.2 METALS 4-3
5. PROBABLE EFFECTS CONCENTRATION QUOTIENTS 5-1
6. SPATIAL ANALYSIS TO DETERMINE HOT SPOTS WITHIN THE
HARBORTOWN AREA 6-1
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page v
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
6.1 METHODOLOGY 6-1
6.2 MODEL RESULTS FOR ALL PEC CONSTITUENTS IN THE
HARBORTOWN AREA 6-1
6.3 MODEL RESULTS FOR PAH EQUILIBRIUM PARTITIONING SEDIMENT
BENCHMARK TOXIC UNITS FOR THE HARBORTOWN AREA 6-3
6.3.1 Spatial Analysis for PAH ESBTUs in Areas A and B 6-3
6.3.2 Spatial Analysis for PAH ESBTUs in Areas C and D 6-3
6.4 MODEL RESULTS FOR PROBABLE EFFECTS CONCENTRATION
QUOTIENTS FOR THE HARBORTOWN AREA 6-4
6.4.1 Spatial Analysis for PEC-Qs in Areas A and B 6-4
6.4.2 Spatial Analysis for PEC-Qs in Areas C and D 6-4
6.5 CLASSIFICATION OF HOT SPOTS BASED ON ALL KRIGING RESULTS IN
THE HARBORTOWN AREA 6-5
6.5.1 Level 1 Hot Spots 6-6
6.5.1.1 Harbortown Hot Spot 1 6-6
6.5.1.2 Riverbend Hot Spot 1 6-7
6.5.2 Level 2 Hot Spots 6-7
6.5.3 Level 3 Hot Spots 6-8
6.5.3.1 Harbortown Hot Spot 2 6-8
6.6 COMPARISON OF HARBORTOWN AREA HOT SPOTS WITH
ASSESSMENTS FOR OTHER SECTIONS OF THE DETROIT RIVER AREA
OF CONCERN 6-8
7. CONCLUSIONS 7-1
8. REFERENCES 8-1
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
APPENDIX C
APPENDIX D
FIELD LOGBOOKS AND DATA COLLECTION FORMS
LITHOLOGIC CORE LOGS
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
PARTICLE SIZE GRAPHS
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page vi
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
LIST OF FIGURES
Number Title
1-1 Project Site Location
1-2 Harbortown Area
1-3 CSOs and Industrial Outfalls in the Harbortown Area
2-1A Sample Locations - Areas A and B
2-1B Sample Locations - Areas C and D
3-1A Total PCB Aroclor (ND = 0) Concentrations (|_ig/kg) Detected in Areas A and B -
Harbortown Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
3-1B Total PCB Aroclor (ND = 0) Concentrations (ng/kg) Detected in Areas C and D
- Harbortown Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
3-2A Total 17 PAHs (ND = V2 RL) Concentrations (|j,g/kg) Detected in Areas A and B
- Harbortown Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
3-2B Total 17 PAHs (ND = V2 RL) Concentrations (|j,g/kg) Detected in Areas C and
D- Harbortown Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
3-3A Arsenic Concentrations (mg/kg) Detected in Areas A and B - Harbortown
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
3-3B Arsenic Concentrations (mg/kg) Detected in Areas C and D - Harbortown
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
3-4A Cadmium Concentrations (mg/kg) Detected in Areas A and B - Harbortown
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
3-4B Cadmium Concentrations (mg/kg) Detected in Areas C and D - Harbortown
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
3-5 A Chromium Concentrations (mg/kg) Detected in Areas A and B- Harbortown
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
3-5B Chromium Concentrations (mg/kg) Detected in Areas C and D - Harbortown
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
3-6A Copper Concentrations (mg/kg) Detected in Areas A and B- Harbortown
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page vii
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
3-6B Copper Concentrations (mg/kg) Detected in Areas C and D - Harbortown
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
3-7A Iron Concentrations (mg/kg) Detected in Areas A and B - Harbortown
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
3-7B Iron Concentrations (mg/kg) Detected in Areas C and D - Harbortown
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
3-8A Lead Concentrations (mg/kg) Detected in Areas A and B- Harbortown
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
3-8B Lead Concentrations (mg/kg) Detected in Areas C and D - Harbortown
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
3-9A Mercury Concentrations (mg/kg) Detected in Areas A and B - Harbortown
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
3-9B Mercury Concentrations (mg/kg) Detected in Areas C and D - Harbortown
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
3-1 OA Nickel Concentrations (mg/kg) Detected in Areas A and B- Harbortown
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
3-1 OB Nickel Concentrations (mg/kg) Detected in Areas C and D - Harbortown
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
3-11A Silver Concentrations (mg/kg) Detected in Areas A and B- Harbortown
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
3-1 IB Silver Concentrations (mg/kg) Detected in Areas C and D - Harbortown
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
3-12A Zinc Concentrations (mg/kg) Detected in Areas A and B- Harbortown
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
3-12B Zinc Concentrations (mg/kg) Detected in Areas C and D - Harbortown
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
3-13 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (£DRO+ORO) (mg/kg) Detected in Areas A
and B - Harbortown Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
3-14A Diesel Range Organics (mg/kg) Detected in Areas A and B - Harbortown
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
3-14B Diesel Range Organics (mg/kg) Detected in Areas C and D - Harbortown
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page viii
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
3-15A Oil Range Organics (mg/kg) Detected in Areas A and B - Harbortown
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
3-15B Oil Range Organics (mg/kg) Detected in Areas C and D - Harbortown
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
4-1A ESBTUs for PAHs in Areas A and B - Harbortown Assessment of Contaminated
Sediments
4-1B ESBTUs for PAHs in Areas C and D - Harbortown Assessment of Contaminated
Sediments
4-2A ESBTUs for Metals in Areas A and B - Harbortown Assessment of Contaminated
Sediments
4-2B ESBTUs for Metals in Areas C and D - Harbortown Assessment of Contaminated
Sediments
5-1A PEC-Qs for Areas A and B - Harbortown Assessment of Contaminated
Sediments
5-1B PEC-Qs for Areas C and D - Harbortown Assessment of Contaminated
Sediments
6-1 Spatial Analysis for All Constituents - Harbortown Assessment of Contaminated
Sediment
6-2A Spatial Analysis for All Constituents in Areas A and B - Harbortown Assessment
of Contaminated Sediment
6-2B Spatial Analysis for All Constituents in Area C - Harbortown Assessment of
Contaminated Sediment
6-2C Spatial Analysis for All Constituents in Area D - Harbortown Assessment of
Contaminated Sediment
6-3 A Spatial Analysis for PAH ESBTUs in Areas A and B - Harbortown Assessment
of Contaminated Sediment
6-3B Spatial Analysis for PAH ESBTUs in Area C - Harbortown Assessment of
Contaminated Sediment
6-3C Spatial Analysis for PAH ESBTUs in Area D - Harbortown Assessment of
Contaminated Sediment
6-4A Spatial Analysis for Mean PEC-Qs in Areas A and B - Harbortown Assessment
of Contaminated Sediment
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page ix
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
6-4B Spatial Analysis for Mean PEC-Qs in Area C - Harbortown Assessment of
Contaminated Sediment
6-4C Spatial Analysis for Mean PEC-Qs in Area D - Harbortown Assessment of
Contaminated Sediment
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
LIST OF TABLES
Number Title
2-1 Harbortown Area Site Characterization Core Sample Coordinates and Field Notes
2-2 Harbortown Area Site Characterization Surface Sample Coordinates and
Description
2-3 Harbortown Area Site Characterization Core Data
2-4 Harbortown Area Site Characterization Actual Analytical Program
3-1 Summary of Exceedances, HT
3-2 Sediment Results for Grain Size, HT
3-3 Sediment Results for Ammonia, HT
3-4 Sediment Results for PCB Aroclors, HT
3-5 Sediment Results for PAHs, HT
3-6 Sediment Results for Metals and TOC, HT
3-7 Sediment Results for SEM/AVS, HT
3-8 Sediment Results for TPHs, HT
4-1 ESBTUs for PAHs, HT
4-2 ESBTUs for SEM/AVS Metals, HT
5-1 PEC-Qs, HT
6-1 Harbortown Hot Spot 1 PECs
6-2 Riverbend Hot Spot 1 and Harbortown Hot Spot 2 PECs
6-3 Harbortown Hot Spot 1 PAH ESBTUs
6-4 Riverbend Hot Spot 1 and HT Hot Spot 2 PAH ESBTUs
6-5 Harbortown Hot Spot 1 PEC-Qs
6-6 Riverbend Hot Spot 1 and HT Hot Spot 2 PEC-Qs
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
°C Degrees Celsius
|ig/kg Microgram(s) per kilogram
|iinol Micromole(s)
|imol/g Micromole(s) per gram
AOC Area of Concern
AVS Acid volatile sulfide
bss Below sediment surface
BUI Beneficial use impairment
Cascade Cascade Drilling, L.P.
COC Contaminant of concern
CSO Combined sewer overflow
cy Cubic yard(s)
DME Dean Marine Excavation
DQO Data quality objective
DRO Diesel range organics
EA EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC and its affiliate EA
Science and Technology
EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
ESB Equilibrium Partitioning Sediment Benchmarks
ESBTU Equilibrium Partitioning Sediment Benchmarks Toxicity Unit
FD Field duplicate
FSP Field Sampling Plan
ft Foot (feet)
goc Gram organic carbon
GLNPO Great Lakes National Program Office
GPS Global positioning system
LRROC Lower Rouge River Old Channel
MDEQ Michigan Department of Environmental Quality
MDNR Michigan Department of Natural Resources
mg/kg Milligram(s) per kilogram
MS Matrix spike
MSD Matrix spike duplicate
NAPL Non-aqueous phase liquid
ND Not detected
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
Page xi
December 2016
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
Page xii
December 2016
ORO
Oil range organics
PAH
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
PCB
Polychlorinated biphenyl
PEC
Probable effects concentration
PEC-Q
Probable effects concentration quotient
PRG
Preliminary remediation goal
QAPP
Quality Assurance Project Plan
RAP
Remedial Action Plan
RL
Reporting Limit
RTK
Real time kinematic
SCBA
Sediment Contaminant Bioavailability Alliance
SEM
Simultaneously extracted metals
SOP
Standard operating procedure
SQG
Sediment Quality Guidelines
SSRSL
Sample-Specific Risk Screening Level
TEC
Threshold effects concentration
TOC
Total organic carbon
TPH
Total petroleum hydrocarbons (sum of ORO and DRO)
WDNR
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page ES-1
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report presents the characterization of contaminated sediments for the Harbortown Area
(site), located within the Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC), Detroit, Michigan. This work
was conducted by EA Engineering, Science and Technology, (MI) PLC and its affiliate EA
Science and Technology (EA) for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Great
Lakes National Program Office (GLNPO) in accordance with the Quality Assurance Project Plan
and the Field Sampling Plan for the Harbortown Area Site Characterization, Detroit River AOC,
Detroit, Michigan (EA 2016b), finalized May 2016. To address the delisting criteria and allow
for the eventual removal of the Degradation of Benthos beneficial use impairment, EPA's
GLNPO, the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, the Detroit River Public Advisory
Committee, and Friends of Detroit River initiated an effort in 2012 to define the "known
contaminated sediment sites" in the Detroit River. The partnership conducted a content analysis
of a number of contaminant studies and established six sediment target sites. The Harbortown
Area is one of the six target areas.
The purpose of this field investigation was to determine the nature and extent of chemical
contamination in the areas of soft sediment deposition. This Site Characterization Report
summarizes the findings from the field investigation, including data tables and maps, data
interpretations, and conclusions of the investigation. The overall objective of this report is to
identify priority areas within the Harbortown site at which remediation efforts might be
warranted or where further investigation should be conducted. This Executive Summary
provides a synopsis of the findings of the Site Characterization Report. Details on the site
background and methodology, and further detail on the findings and conclusions are presented in
Chapters 1 through 8 of the report. This report also includes data from three locations in the
Harbortown Area which were sampled during the Riverbend Area site characterization field
effort (October to November 2015) in accordance with the Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Quality Assurance Project Plan and Field Sampling Program (EA 2016a).
ES.l SEDIMENT CHEMISTRY RESULTS
For reporting and visual presentation of the results of the sediment investigation, the Harbortown
Area was divided into four areas. Area A contains 4 sample locations, HT16-01 through
HT16-04, which lie on the east bank of the Detroit River proximal to Belle Isle; Area B begins
just south of the MacArthur Bridge and extends along the western bank of the Detroit River,
including 10 sample locations, HT16-05 through HT16-14. Area C continues where Area B
ends, contains 18 locations, HT16-16 through HT16-30 and HBT15-A, -B, and -C. Area D is
located further upstream on the western bank and contains one sample location,
HT16-33. This location was determined in the field and was selected to supplement data
presented in the Riverbend SCR (EA 2016c).
Constituent concentrations detected in sediment samples were compared to threshold effects
concentrations (TECs), probable effects concentrations (PECs), Equilibrium Partitioning
Sediment Benchmark Toxicity Units (ESBTUs), Probable Effects Concentration Quotients
(PEC-Qs), and Sample Specific Risk Screening Levels (SSRSLs). TECs typically represent
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page ES-2
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
concentrations below which adverse biological effects are unlikely to be observed, while PECs
typically represent concentrations above which adverse effects are likely to be observed
(MacDonald et al. 2000). A PEC has not been developed for total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH)
(diesel range organics [DRO] + oil range organics [ORO]), but the DRO and ORO results were
compared to SSRSLs. Concentrations that are between the TEC and PEC represent the
concentrations at which adverse biological effects occasionally occur. ESBTUs were calculated
to estimate whether there is potential ecological risk associated with exposure to pore water that
is in equilibrium with a measured concentration of the contaminant in the sediment. PEC-Qs
are used to evaluate the combined effects of chemical mixtures on the toxicity of sediments to
benthic organisms against mean PEC quotients or benchmarks (mean quotients of 0.1, 0.5, 1,
and 5) (Ingersoll et al. 2001).
Bulk Chemistry
With the exception of Area A, total polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) concentrations (not detected
[ND]=0) exceeded the TEC in most of the surface grab samples in the Harbortown Area.
Concentrations exceeding the PEC were detected in surface grab samples at one location in Area
B, six locations in Area C, and the location in Area D. Total PCB concentrations exceeding the
PEC were also detected in at least one depth interval in cores from one location in Area B, 10
locations in Area C, one of which was the maximum detected total PCB concentration in the
Harbortown Area (HT16-19), and the location in Area D.
For total 17 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) (ND=l/2 reporting limit [RL]), the
majority of samples exceeded the PEC. In Area A, two of the four locations had surface grab
samples with a total 17 PAH concentration less than the TEC; in the core samples, only one
location had a maximum total 17 PAH concentration in at least one depth interval that was
between the PEC and two times the PEC. In Area B, five surface grab samples had total 17 PAH
concentrations that were between three times and ten times the PEC; one location had a total 17
PAH concentration that was between the PEC and two times the PEC; and the remaining
locations had surface grab samples with total 17 PAH concentrations that were less than the
PEC. In the core samples, four locations had a maximum 17 PAH concentration in at least one
depth interval that was greater than lOx the PEC; two locations had a maximum 17 PAH
concentration in at least one depth interval that was between 3x and lOx the PEC; one location
had a maximum 17 PAH concentration in at least one depth interval that was between two times
and three times the PEC, and the remaining locations had subsurface samples with total 17 PAH
concentrations that were less than the PEC. In Area C, one surface grab sample had a total 17
PAH concentration greater than lOx the PEC; two locations had total 17 PAH concentrations
between three times and ten times the PEC; three locations had total 17 PAH concentrations
between two times and three times the PEC; and the remaining locations had total 17 PAH
concentrations in the surface grab sample that were between the TEC and PEC. The maximum
total 17 PAH concentration detected in the surface grab samples in the Harbortown area was at
HT16-31. In the core samples, eight locations had a maximum 17 PAH concentration in at least
one depth interval that was greater than ten times the PEC; six locations had a maximum 17 PAH
concentration in at least one depth interval that was between three times and ten times the PEC;
one location had at a maximum total 17 PAH concentration in at least one depth interval that was
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page ES-3
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
between the PEC and two the PEC; and the remaining locations had subsurface intervals with
total 17 PAH concentrations that were below the PEC. The maximum total 17 PAH
concentration detected in the subsurface samples in the Harbortown area was at HT16-23. In
Area D, the surface grab sample at HT16-33 had a total 17 PAH concentration that was between
the PEC and two times the PEC and the maximum total 17 PAH concentration in the subsurface
samples was greater than ten times the PEC in at least one depth interval.
For arsenic in Area A, each of the surface grab samples and each of the core samples had
concentrations below the TEC. In Area B, each of the surface grab samples had a concentration
below the TEC with the exception of one location, HT16-09, which had a concentration between
the TEC and PEC. This was the highest surface sample arsenic concentration detected in the
Harbortown area. In the core samples, one location had a maximum arsenic concentration in at
least one depth interval that was greater than three times the PEC; one location had a maximum
arsenic concentration in at least one depth interval that was between two times and three times
the PEC; and the remaining locations' subsurface samples had maximum arsenic concentrations
that were below the PEC. The maximum subsurface arsenic concentration detected in the
Harbortown area was at HT16-12. In Area C, each of the surface grab samples had arsenic
concentrations below the TEC. In the core samples, one location had a maximum arsenic
concentration in at least one depth interval that was between two times and three the PEC; and
the remaining locations' subsurface samples had maximum arsenic concentrations below the
PEC. In Area D, the surface and each of the core intervals from HT16-33 had arsenic
concentrations less than the TEC.
For cadmium in Area A, each of the surface grab samples and the majority of the core samples
had cadmium concentrations below the TEC. The maximum cadmium concentration in one core
sample from one location was between the TEC and PEC. In Area B, the surface grab sample
from one location had a concentration between two times and three times the PEC; two locations
had surface sample cadmium concentrations between the PEC and two times the PEC; and the
remaining locations had surface cadmium concentrations below the PEC. The highest surface
sample cadmium concentration detected in the Harbortown area was at location HT16-11. In the
core samples, one location had a maximum cadmium concentration in at least one depth interval
that was greater than three times the PEC; one location had a maximum cadmium concentration
in at least one depth interval that was between two times and three times the PEC; and the
remaining locations' subsurface samples had a maximum cadmium concentration in at least one
depth interval that was below the PEC. In Area C, ten surface grab samples had cadmium
concentrations between the TEC and the remaining locations had surface grab sample cadmium
concentrations below the TEC. In the core samples, seven locations had a maximum cadmium
concentration in at least one depth interval that was greater than three times the PEC; one
location had a maximum cadmium concentration in at least one depth interval that was between
two times and three times the PEC; one location had a maximum cadmium concentration in at
least one depth interval that was between the PEC and two times the PEC; and the remaining
locations' subsurface samples had maximum chromium concentrations below the PEC. The
highest subsurface cadmium concentration in the Harbortown area was detected in HT16-16. In
Area D, the surface sample from HT16-33 had a cadmium concentration less than the TEC. The
maximum cadmium concentration detected in the core intervals was between the TEC and PEC.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Revision: 01
Page ES-4
December 2016
For chromium in Area A, each of the surface grab samples and each of the core samples had
chromium concentrations below the TEC. In Area B, two surface grab samples had a
concentration between the PEC and two times the PEC and the remaining locations had surface
grab sample chromium concentrations below the PEC. In the core samples, two locations had a
maximum chromium concentration in at least one depth interval that was greater than three times
the PEC; one location had a maximum chromium concentration in at least one depth interval that
was between the PEC and two times the PEC; and the remaining seven locations' subsurface
samples had maximum chromium concentrations that were below the TEC. In Area C, one
location had a surface grab sample concentration between the PEC and two times the PEC; five
locations had concentrations between the TEC and PEC; and the remaining locations had surface
grab sample chromium concentrations below the TEC. The highest chromium concentration
detected in the surface grab samples in the Harbortown area was from location HT16-29. In the
core samples, one location had a maximum chromium concentration in at least one depth interval
that was greater than three times the PEC; one location had a maximum chromium concentration
in at least one depth interval that was between two times and three times the PEC; three locations
had a maximum chromium concentration in at least one depth interval that was between the PEC
and two times the PEC; and the remaining locations' subsurface samples had maximum
chromium concentrations below the PEC. The highest subsurface chromium concentration in the
Harbortown area was detected in HT 16-28. In Area D, the surface sample from HT16-33 had a
chromium concentration less than the TEC. The maximum chromium concentration detected in
the core intervals was between the TEC and PEC.
For copper in Area A, each of the surface grab samples and all but one the core samples had
copper concentrations below the TEC. One subsurface depth interval at one location was
between the TEC and PEC. In Area B, two of the surface grab samples had a concentration
between the two times and three times the PEC; two locations had surface sample copper
concentrations between the PEC and two times the PEC; and the remaining locations had surface
copper concentrations below the PEC. The highest surface grab copper concentration in the
Harbortown area was detected at HT16-11. In the core samples, one location had a maximum
copper concentration in at least one depth interval that was greater than three times the PEC;
three locations had a maximum copper concentration in at least one depth interval that was
between the two times and three times the PEC; and the remaining locations' subsurface samples
had a maximum copper concentration in at least one depth interval that was below the PEC. The
highest copper concentration detected in the subsurface samples in the Harbortown area was at
HT16-11. In Area C, fourteen of the surface grab sample concentrations were between the
TEC and PEC and the remaining locations had surface grab sample copper concentrations below
the TEC. In the core samples, three locations had a maximum copper concentration in at least
one depth interval that was between two and three times the PEC; one location had a maximum
copper concentration in at least one depth interval that was between the PEC and two times the
PEC; and the remaining locations' subsurface samples had maximum copper concentrations
below the PEC. The highest subsurface copper concentration in the Harbortown area was
detected in HT 16-28. In Area D, the surface sample from HT16-33 had a copper concentration
between the TEC and PEC. The maximum copper concentration detected in the core intervals
was between the TEC and PEC.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Revision: 01
Page ES-5
December 2016
For iron in Area A, the surface grab sample with the highest iron concentration was between the
TEC and PEC. In Area B, each of the surface grab samples had iron concentrations below the
TEC. In the cores, two locations each had one subsurface depth interval with an iron
concentration between the TEC and PEC. In Area C, the surface grab sample at one location had
an iron concentration between the PEC and two times the PEC; and the remaining locations had
surface grab sample iron concentrations below the PEC. The highest detected iron concentration
in the surface grab samples in the Harbortown area was at HT16-29. In the core samples, one
location had a maximum iron concentration in at least one depth interval that was between the
PEC and two times the PEC; and the remaining locations' subsurface samples had maximum
iron concentrations below the PEC. The highest subsurface iron concentration in the
Harbortown area was detected in HT16-27. In Area D, the surface grab and subsurface samples
from HT16-33 had iron concentrations below the TEC.
For lead in Area A, each of the surface grab samples and all but one core samples had lead
concentrations below the TEC. In the cores, one interval had a lead concentration between the
TEC and PEC. In Area B, three surface grab samples had concentrations greater than three the
PEC); the surface grab sample from one location had a lead concentration between two times and
three times the PEC; the surface grab sample from one location had a lead concentration between
the PEC and two times the PEC; and the remaining locations had grab surface sample
concentrations that were less than the PEC. The grab surface sample with the highest detected
lead concentration in the Harbortown area was at HT16-11. In the core samples, three locations
had a maximum lead concentration in at least one depth interval that was greater than three times
the PEC; two locations had a maximum lead concentration in at least one depth interval that was
between two times and three times the PEC; and the remaining locations' subsurface samples
had lead concentrations that were less than the TEC. In Area C, four surface grab samples had
lead concentrations between the PEC and two times the PEC; and the remaining locations had
surface grab samples with lead concentrations that were below the PEC. In the core samples,
twelve locations had a maximum lead concentration in at least one depth interval that was greater
than three times the PEC; two locations had a maximum lead concentration in at least one depth
interval that was between two times and three times the PEC; two locations had maximum lead
concentrations in at least one depth interval that was between the PEC and two times the PEC;
and the remaining six locations' subsurface samples had maximum lead concentrations below
the TEC. The highest subsurface lead concentration in the Harbortown area was detected in
HT16-27. In Area D, the surface grab sample from HT16-33 had a lead concentration between
the TEC and PEC. The maximum lead concentration in the subsurface samples was between
2x and 3x the PEC.
For mercury in Area A, two of the surface grab sample concentrations were between the TEC
and PEC, and the remaining two surface grab sample concentrations were less than the TEC.
HT16-02 was the only location with subsurface sample concentrations between the TEC and
PEC in each depth interval; the remaining three locations' subsurface concentrations were less
than the TEC. In Area B, the surface grab sample from one location had a concentration
between two times and three times the PEC; six locations had surface grab samples with mercury
concentrations between the TEC and PEC; and the remaining two locations had grab surface
sample concentrations that were less than the TEC. The grab surface sample with the highest
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page ES-6
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
detected mercury concentration in the Harbortown area was at HT16-05. In the core samples,
three locations had maximum mercury concentrations in at least one depth interval that were
greater than three times the PEC; two locations had maximum mercury concentrations in at least
one depth interval that were between two times and three times the PEC); and the remaining
locations' subsurface samples had mercury concentrations that were less than the TEC. In Area
C, none of the surface grab samples had mercury concentrations that exceeded the PEC. In the
core samples, nine locations had a maximum mercury concentration in at least one depth interval
that was greater than three times the PEC; one location had a maximum mercury concentration in
at least one depth interval that was between two times and three times the PEC; two locations
had a maximum mercury concentration in at least one depth interval that was between the PEC
and two times the PEC 0); and the remaining locations' subsurface samples had maximum
mercury concentrations below the PEC. The highest subsurface mercury concentration in the
Harbortown area was detected in HT16-15. In Area D, the surface grab sample from HT16-33
had a mercury concentration between the TEC and PEC. The maximum mercury concentration
in the subsurface samples was between the PEC and two times the PEC.
For nickel in Area A, one location had a surface grab sample nickel concentration that was
between the TEC and PEC; the remaining three locations had surface grab samples with nickel
concentrations below the TEC. In the core samples, two locations had a maximum nickel
concentration in at least one depth interval that was between the TEC and PEC; the remaining
two locations' subsurface sample concentrations were less than the TEC. In Area B, the surface
grab sample from one location had a concentration between the PEC and two times the PEC;
four locations had surface grab samples with nickel concentrations between the TEC and PEC;
and the remaining four locations had grab surface sample concentrations that were less than the
TEC. The grab surface sample with the highest detected nickel concentration in the Harbortown
area was at HT 16-05. In the core samples, one location had a maximum nickel concentration in
at least one depth interval that was greater than three times the PEC; one location had a
maximum nickel concentration in at least one depth interval that was between the PEC and two
times the PEC; six locations had a maximum nickel concentration that was between the TEC and
PEC; and the remaining locations' subsurface samples had nickel concentrations that were less
than the TEC. The highest subsurface nickel concentration in the Harbortown area was detected
in the field duplicate for HT16-13. In Area C, nine surface grab samples had nickel
concentrations between the TEC and PEC and the remaining twelve locations had concentrations
less than the TEC. In the core samples, three locations had a maximum nickel concentration in
at least one depth interval that was greater between two times and three times the PEC; four
locations had a maximum nickel concentration in at least one depth interval that was between the
PEC and two times the PEC; and the remaining locations had subsurface samples with nickel
concentrations less than the PEC. In Area D, the surface grab sample from HT16-33 had a
nickel concentration below the TEC. The maximum nickel concentration in the subsurface
samples was between the TEC and the PEC.
For silver in Area A, two locations had a surface grab sample silver concentration that was
between the TEC and PEC; the remaining two locations had surface grab samples with silver
concentrations below the TEC. In the core samples, none of the subsurface samples exceeded the
TEC. In Area B, none of the surface grab samples exceeded the PEC with the exception of
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Revision: 01
Page ES-7
December 2016
HT16-11; all of the other samples were less than the TEC. In the core samples, three locations
had a maximum silver concentration in at least one depth interval that was greater between the
PEC and two times the PEC and the remaining locations' subsurface samples had silver
concentrations that were less than the PEC. In Area C, two locations had grab surface samples
with silver concentrations between the PEC and two times the PEC; the remaining locations had
grab surface sample concentrations below the TEC. The grab surface sample with the highest
detected silver concentration in the Harbortown area was at HT16-15. In the core samples, one
location had a maximum silver concentration in at least one depth interval that was greater than
three times the PEC; two locations had a maximum silver concentration in at least one depth
interval that was between two times and three times the PEC; two locations had a maximum
silver concentration in at least one depth interval that was between the PEC and two times the
PEC; and the remaining locations had subsurface samples with silver concentrations less than
the PEC. The highest subsurface silver concentration in the Harbortown area was detected at
HT16-16. In Area D, the surface grab sample from HT16-33 had a silver concentration between
TEC and PEC. The maximum silver concentration in the subsurface samples between the PEC
and two times the PEC.
For zinc in Area A, none of the grab surface samples nor subsurface core samples had zinc
concentrations that exceeded the TEC. In Area B, the grab surface sample at one location had a
concentration between two times and three times the PEC and the grab surface sample from one
location had a zinc concentration between the PEC and two times the PEC. The remaining
surface grab samples did not have zinc concentrations that exceeded the PEC. The highest grab
surface sample zinc concentration in the Harbortown area was in the sample from HT16-05. In
the core samples, HT16-13 had a maximum zinc concentration in at least one depth interval that
was greater than three times the PEC; two locations had had a maximum zinc concentration in at
least one depth interval that was between the two times and three times the PEC and the
remaining locations' subsurface samples had zinc concentrations that were less than the PEC. In
Area C, none of the grab surface samples had zinc concentrations that exceeded the PEC.
Thirteen locations had concentrations between the TEC and PEC; and the remaining locations
had grab surface samples with zinc concentrations below the TEC. In the core samples, one
location had a maximum zinc concentration in at least one depth interval that was greater than
three times the PEC; two locations had a maximum zinc concentration in at least one depth
interval that was between two times and three times the PEC; four locations had a maximum zinc
concentration in at least one depth interval that was between the PEC and two times the PEC;
and the remaining locations had subsurface samples with zinc concentrations less than the PEC.
The highest subsurface zinc concentration in the Harbortown area was detected at location
HT16-16. In Area D, the surface grab sample from HT16-33 had a zinc concentration below the
TEC. The maximum zinc concentration in the subsurface samples was between the TEC and
The ratio of simultaneously extracted metals (SEM) to acid volatile sulfide was calculated for
all surface grab samples. Twelve samples had an SEM/acid volatile sulfide ratio greater than or
equal to 1 (HT16-06, -07, -09, -11, -14, -16, -20, -23, -27, -31, -32, and -29). This indicates that
metals may be bioavailable and there is potential for toxicity to benthic organisms.
PEC.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page ES-8
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
The highest concentration of DRO (C10-C20) was detected in the surface interval in the field
duplicate from HT16-21 (5,700 milligrams per kilogram [mg/kg]). The highest concentration of
ORO (C20-C36) was also detected in the field duplicate from the surface interval of HT16-21
(5,400 mg/kg). DRO (C10-C20) and ORO (C20-C36) concentrations were summed (by location) to
create a TPH concentration (TPH [DRO+ORO]) for each location. A PEC has not been
developed for TPH (DRO + ORO), but the DRO and ORO results were compared to SSRSLs.
For Area A, all but one location had DRO concentrations exceeding the SSRSL. HT 16-02 had a
concentration that was between two and three times the respective SSRSL, and two locations in
Area A had DRO concentrations that were between one and two times the respective SSRSL. In
Area A, two locations had ORO concentrations that did not exceed the SSRSL and the remaining
two locations had concentrations between one and two times the respective SSRSL. Each of the
locations in Area B had DRO concentrations that exceeded the respective SSRSL. Seven
locations in Area B had DRO concentrations greater than three times the respective SSRSL; one
location had a DRO concentration that was between two and three times the respective SSRSL;
and one location had a DRO concentration that was between one and two times the respective
SSRSL. Each of the locations in Area B had ORO concentrations that exceeded the respective
SSRSL. Seven locations in Area B had ORO concentrations greater than three times the
respective SSRSL; two locations had ORO concentrations that were between one and two times
the respective SSRSL. For Area C, all but five locations had DRO concentrations that exceeded
the respective SSRSL. Two locations had DRO concentrations between two and three times the
respective SSRSL; four locations had DRO concentrations between one and two times the
respective SSRSL; and the remaining locations had DRO concentrations that were greater than
three times the respective SSRSL. In Area C, all but four locations had ORO concentrations that
exceeded the respective SSRSL. Three locations had ORO concentrations between two and
three times the respective SSRSL; three locations had ORO concentrations between one and two
times the respective SSRSL; and the remaining locations had ORO concentrations that were
greater than three times the respective SSRSL. For Area D, the DRO and ORO concentrations
were greater than three times the respective SSRSL at one location.
ES.2 EQUILIBRIUM PARTITIONING SEDIMENT BENCHMARK TOXICITY UNITS
AND PROBABLE EFFECTS CONCENTRATION QUOTIENTS
ESBTUs were calculated to estimate whether there is potential ecological risk associated with
exposure to pore water that is in equilibrium with a measured concentration of the contaminant
in the sediment.
Typically, a PAH ESBTU less than or equal to 1 indicates that benthic organisms are not
expected to be harmed by contamination present in the sediments (EPA 2003a). The samples
with PAH ESBTUs greater than 1 may be toxic to aquatic life. In Area A, none of the locations
that were sampled had a PAH ESBTU greater than 1 in the surface grab samples. For the core
samples, HT 16-02 was the only location with at least one subsurface sample with a PAH ESBTU
greater than 1. In Area B, all but one of the locations that were sampled had a grab surface
sample PAH ESBTU greater than 1. Four locations had PAH ESBTU values greater than 10;
one location had a PAH ESBTU between 7.5 and 10; and three locations had PAH ESBTU
values between 1 and 7.5. In the core samples, all but one location had a subsurface sample
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Page ES-9
December 2016
PAH ESBTU greater than 1 in at least one depth interval. At five locations, the maximum PAH
ESBTU value was greater than 10 in at least one subsurface depth interval; at two locations, the
maximum PAH ESBTU was between 7.5 and 10 in at least one depth interval; and at the
remaining two locations the maximum PAH ESBTU value was between 1 and 7.5 in at least one
depth interval. In Area C, four locations had grab surface sample PAH ESBTU values that were
greater than 10; seven locations had a grab surface sample PAH ESBTU less than 1; and the
remaining grab surface sample PAH ESBTUs were between 1 and 7.5. In the core samples eight
locations had a the maximum PAH ESBTU value that was greater than 10 in at least one
subsurface depth interval; at two locations, the maximum PAH ESBTU was between 7.5 and 10
in at least one depth interval; at six locations the maximum PAH ESBTU value was between 1
and 7.5 in at least one depth interval; and at the remaining locations the maximum PAH ESBTU
was less than 1 in the subsurface samples. In Area D, the grab surface sample PAH ESBTU and
the maximum PAH ESBTU detected in the subsurface core samples were greater than 10.
ESBTU results for metals exceeded 130 micromoles per organic compound (|imol/goc)in none of
the surface grab samples from Area A, four surface grab samples from Area B,, five surface
grab samples from Area C, and HT16-33 from Area D. All of the metals ESBTU results were
less than 3,000 |imol/goc
PEC-Qs are used to evaluate the combined effects of chemical mixtures on the toxicity of
sediments to benthic organisms against mean PEC quotients or benchmarks (mean quotients of
0.1, 0.5, 1, and 5) (Ingersoll et al. 2001). They use consensus-based freshwater sediment quality
guidelines (SQGs) to calculate concentration quotients (or hazard quotients), defined as
measured sediment concentrations divided by the specific SQG for that particular chemical or
metal. The principle of PEC-Qs is to calculate the geometric mean of all quotients for that
particular sediment sample, including those for metals, PAHs, and PCBs. When the geometric
mean PEC-Q is regressed with the percent of toxicity found in that sample (typically growth or
mortality), as shown in Ingersoll et al. (2001), and the geometric mean of the PEC-Qs is
approximately 1, between 30 percent and 50 percent of the organisms showed a toxic effect,
meaning that between 70 percent and 50 percent of the organisms should not show an effect
when the PEC-Q is 1. The proportion of organisms which show a toxic effect is in the range of
6 to 35 percent when a geometric mean of the PEC-Q of 0.5 is used, meaning that between 94
percent and 65 percent of organisms do not show a toxic effect when the PEC-Q is 0.5 (Ingersoll
et. al. 2001). A single PEC-Q was determined for each sediment sample (named the mean
PEC-Q) to provide an overall measure of chemical contamination and to support an evaluation of
the combined potential effects of multiple constituents in the sediment collected from the site
(EPA 2000).
The mean PEC-Qs in the Harbortown Area ranged from 0.04 to 92.34. The mean PEC-Q for
each sediment sample was compared to benchmarks of 0.5, 1, and 5. The mean PEC-Q values in
the surface grab samples from Area A were each calculated to be less than 0.5. In the core
samples from Area A, only one sample had a mean PEC-Q greater than 0.5. In the surface grab
samples from Area B, mean PEC-Qs were calculated to be: below 0.5 at five locations, between
0.5 and 1.0 at five locations, between 1 and 5 at five locations, and greater than 5 at one location.
In the surface grab samples from Area B, the mean PEC-Q value at one location was greater than
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page ES-10
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
5; between 1 and 5 at four locations; between 0.5 and 1 at one location; and the remaining
locations had mean PEC-Q values less than 0.5. In the core samples from Area B, four of the
locations had a maximum PEC-Q value in at least one depth interval that was greater than 5;
three locations had a maximum PEC-Q value in at least one depth interval that was between 1
and 5; and the remaining locations had subsurface samples with PEC-Q values less than 0.5. In
the surface grab samples from Area C, one location had a mean PEC-Q value greater than 5; six
locations had PEC-Q values between 1 and 5; two locations had values between 0.5 and 1; and
the remaining locations had values less than 0.5. In the core samples, seven locations had a
maximum mean PEC-Q value in at least one depth interval that was greater than 5; eight
locations had a maximum mean PEC-Q value in at least one depth interval that was between 1
and 5; one location had a maximum PEC-Q value in at least one depth interval that was between
0.5 and 1; and the remaining locations had subsurface samples with mean PEC-Q values that
were less than 0.5. In Area D, the surface sample from HT16-33 had a mean PEC-Q value
between 1 and 5, and in the subsurface samples the maximum mean PEC-Q value was greater
than 5 in one depth interval.
ES.3 SPATIAL ANALYSIS
To determine the location of hot spots within the Harbortown Area, all individual constituents
with concentrations exceeding their respective PEC in sediment samples, the calculated PAH
ESBTUs, and the calculated PEC-Qs were spatially interpolated using the kriging method.
Although ESBTUs were also calculated for metals, these data were not included in the model
inputs for the spatial analysis because only three results exceeded the relevant thresholds and
these results occurred within the hot spots that were otherwise identified. Determination of hot
spots allows priority areas to be targeted for further investigation or remediation. Three hot spots
in the study area where one or more analytes were present in concentrations exceeding the PEC
have been identified. The three identified hot spot areas were prioritized for further investigation
and potential remediation efforts by taking into consideration the results of the spatial analysis of
PAH ESBTUs and PEC-Qs. Hot spots were categorized as Level 1, 2, or 3, with Level 1 hot
spots having the highest impact and Level 3 hot spots having the lowest impact and lowest
priority for further investigation. To be considered Level 1, hot spots must have a contaminant
result that is equal to or greater than three times the respective PEC, a PEC-Q value equal to or
greater than 5, or an ESBTU equal to or greater than 7.5. To be considered Level 2, hot spots
must have a contaminant result that is equal to or greater than three times the respective PEC, a
PEC-Q value equal to or greater than 1, or an ESBTU equal to or greater than 7.5. To be
considered Level 3, hot spots must have a contaminant result that is equal to or greater than three
times the respective PEC, a PEC-Q value equal to or greater than 0.5, or an ESBTU equal to or
greater than 1.
Harbortown Hot Spot 1 and Riverbend Hot Spot 1 each have at least one contaminant of concern
(COC) result that is equal to or greater than three times the respective PEC. Both of these
identified hot spots also have at least one PEC-Q equal to or greater than 5 and at least one
ESBTU result equal to or greater than 7.5, and therefore both of these hots spots meet the
Level 1 criteria.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page ES-11
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
Harbortown Hot Spot 1 contains 31 sample locations: 9 of the 10 sample locations in Area B
and each of the 22 locations in Area C. The COCs for this hot spot area are total 17 PAHs, total
PCBs, and 10 metals (arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, iron, lead, mercury, nickel, silver,
and zinc). The predominant constituent contributing to elevated concentrations above the PEC is
total 17 PAHs, which exceeded three times the PEC at 24 of the 31 sample locations. The
majority of sample locations in Harbortown Hot Spot 1 had PAH ESBTUS greater than 10.
Exceptions to this were four locations had PAH ESBTUs between 7.5 and 10; eight locations had
PAH ESBTUs between 1 and 7.5; and two locations had PAH ESBTUs that did not
exceed 1. In addition, nine sample locations, each of which had PAH ESBTUs greater than 10,
had metal ESBTUs greater than 130 |imol/goc, which indicates these locations may have adverse
biological effects associated with metals. The majority of samples in Harbortown Hot Spot 1
had PEC-Q values greater than 0.5. There were 12 locations that PAH ESBTUs greater than 10
and also had PEC-Q values greater than 5.
Riverbend Hot Spot 1 was identified in the Riverbend SCR (EA 2016c), and a section of it
includes sample locations HT16-33, RB15-01, -02, and -03. The COCs for this hot spot area are
total PCBs, total 17 PAHs, and eight metals (cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury, nickel,
silver, and zinc). The predominant constituent contributing to elevated concentrations above the
PEC is total 17PAHs, which exceeded three times the PEC at three of the four locations and
exceeded the PEC at the fourth location. Three of the four sample locations in Riverbend Hot
Spot 1 had maximum PAH ESBTUs that were greater than 10; the fourth location had a PAH
ESBTU between 1 and 7.5. Three of the four sample locations in Riverbend Hot Spot 1 had
maximum PEC-Qs greater than 5 with the exception of RB15-03, which had a PEC-Q of 4.75
(EA 2016c).
Harbortown Hotspot 2 has a PAH ESBTU greater than 1 and a PEC-Q value greater than 0.5,
and therefore meets the Level 3 criteria.
Harbortown Hot Spot 2 includes sample location HT16-02. The COCs for this hot spot area are
total 17 PAHs and the PAH ESBTU. Concentrations of total 17 PAHs exceeded the PEC at
HT16-02, the PAH ESBTU was greater than 1, and the PEC-Q value was greater than 0.5.
ES.4 CONCLUSIONS
Based on the data collected during the Harbortown Area sediment characterization, the Level 1
(highest impact) hotspot areas with elevated concentrations of constituents are: Harbortown
Hotspot 1 (includes all of Areas B and C) and Riverbend Hot Spot 1 (includes HT16-33, RB-01,
-02, and -03) (EA 2016c). (Figures 6-2A, 6-2B, and 6-2C). These Level 1 high impact hot spots
have an estimated total of approximately 868,343 cubic yards (cy) of sediment with constituent
concentrations exceeding 3 times at least one PEC.
A level 3 (lowest impact) Hot Spot area with elevated concentrations of PAH ESBTUs is
Harbortown Hot Spot 2 (includes one location adjacent to Belle Isle). This Level 3 low impact
Hot Spot has an estimated total of approximately 501 cy of sediment with PAH ESBTUs
exceeding 1.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Page ES-12
December 2016
The three hot spots identified in the Harbortown Area were determined to be Level 1 or 3
hotspots and should be considered for further investigation. Model results indicated that two of
these three areas have (Level 1) a large volume of sediment with elevated concentrations of
constituents exceeding three times respective PECs, elevated PAH ESBTUs and PEC-Qs, as well
as metal ESBTUs greater than 130 |imol/goc. There is a possible correlation of elevated
concentrations being associated with soft sediment; cores that were comprised completely of fat
gray clay fewer to no exceedances. Further delineation of the extent of sediment with elevated
concentrations of constituents is recommended.
The modeling results for all constituents exceeding two or three times the PEC, the PAH
ESBTUs, and the PEC-Qs suggest that the hot spot areas should be considered for further
investigation and potential remediation within the Harbortown Area. However, it should be
noted that the limited number of samples results in significant uncertainty of the volume of
sediment with elevated concentrations of constituents in the hotspot areas.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 1-1
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
1. INTRODUCTION
This report presents the contaminated sediments assessment site characterization for the
Harbortown Area (the site), located within the Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC), Detroit,
Michigan (Figure 1-1). This work was conducted by EA Engineering, Science, and Technology,
(MI) PLC and its affiliate EA Science and Technology (EA) for the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency's (EPA's) Great Lakes National Program Office (GLNPO) in accordance
with the Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) and Field Sampling Plan (FSP) for the
Harbortown Area Site Characterization, Detroit River AOC, Detroit, Michigan, which was
finalized in May 2016 (EA 2016b). This report also includes data from three locations in the
Harbortown Area which were sampled during the Riverbend Area site characterization field
effort (October to November 2015) in accordance with the Riverbend Area Site Characterization
QAPP and FSP (EA 2016a).
1.1 WORK SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES
1.1.1 Project Objectives
The purpose of the field investigation was to obtain the data necessary to define the spatial
(horizontal and vertical) nature and extent of chemical contamination in the areas of soft
sediment deposition—using the kriging method to model—in the Harbortown Area. The
primary objectives of the field investigation were collection and chemical and physical analysis
of surface and subsurface sediment from locations in the Harbortown Area to characterize the
contaminated sediments as a basis for identifying possible areas of focus, for further evaluation
and/or remediation, in the Detroit River.
1.1.2 Objectives of the Site Characterization Report
This site characterization report summarizes the findings from the field investigation, including
data tables and maps, data interpretation, and conclusions of the investigation. The results of this
site characterization were evaluated to assess the sediment quality of the Harbortown Area. The
overall objectives of this report are to define the spatial extent of constituents and soft sediment,
develop a preliminary estimate of volume of sediment with elevated concentrations of
constituents, and identify priority areas within the Harbortown Area at which remediation efforts
might be warranted.
1.2 SITE LOCATION AND HISTORY
The Detroit River is a 32-mile strait from Lake St. Clair to Lake Erie, forming the international
boundary between the Province of Ontario, Canada, and the State of Michigan (Michigan
Department of Environmental Quality [MDEQ] 2008). The Detroit River flows in a southerly
direction and connects the upper Great Lakes to Lake Erie. Although the Detroit River has five
tributaries, more than 95 percent of its total flow comes from Lake Huron via the St. Clair River
and Lake St. Clair (EPA 2015). The Detroit River AOC is 807 square miles and includes the
areas which drain directly to the river, the drainage area of its tributaries in Michigan and
Harbortown Area Site Characterization Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 1-2
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
Ontario (700 square miles of land), and a 107 square mile area of the City of Detroit sewershed.
The Detroit River AOC and the Harbortown project area is shown on Figure 1-1. Approximately
75 percent of the total land area of the watershed is in Michigan (607.7 square miles) (MDEQ
1996). The mean discharge of the Detroit River into Lake Erie is 185,000 cubic feet (ft) per
second. Its velocity is 1 to 3 ft per second, and the average time for water to pass through the
river is about 21 hours. The project location includes the Harbortown Area, which is one of six
target areas in the Detroit River AOC. The Harbortown Area is a 2-mile stretch of the upper
Detroit River beginning at the bridge that connects Detroit to Belle Isle (MacArthur Bridge); and
extending to the Renaissance Center in downtown Detroit, Michigan (Figure 1-2). The site was
geographically divided into Areas A, B, C, and D for ease of presentation; further details are
provided in Section 3.2.
The Detroit River has a past and present use as an industrial and drinking water source. Very
little historical information exists documenting the nature and extent of contamination. The river
is heavily industrialized and has been for nearly 100 years. Under the Great Lakes Water
Quality Agreement, a Detroit River Stage 1 Remedial Action Plan (RAP) was completed in
1991. The Stage 1 RAP described the river's use and conditions, and identified 11 beneficial use
impairments (BUIs) for the Detroit River AOC (Michigan Department of Natural Resources
[MDNR] 1991). Known causes of the impairments include urban and industrial development in
the watershed, bacteria, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
(PAHs), metals, and oils and greases. Combined sewer overflows (CSOs) and municipal and
industrial discharges are major sources of contaminants within the AOC. Stormwater runoff and
discharge from tributaries in Michigan are also major sources of contaminants. The following
BUIs were identified in the Stage 1 RAP:
• Restrictions on fish and wildlife consumption
• Tainting of fish and wildlife flavor
• Restrictions on drinking water consumption, or taste and odor
• Degradation of fish and wildlife populations
• Beach closings
• Fish tumors or other deformities
• Degradation of aesthetics
• Bird or animal deformities or reproduction problems
• Degradation of benthos
• Restriction on dredging activities
• Loss of fish and wildlife habitat.
At the time the Stage 1 RAP was drafted, six municipal drinking water intakes serving
approximately 4.1 million people in nearly 100 communities, and approximately 25 industries,
withdrew water from the Detroit River. As a receiving water, approximately 30 industries and
power plants discharged cooling water and/or process water, and 10 municipal wastewater
treatment plants discharged industrial and domestic wastewater. The principal industrial
discharges were on the Michigan shoreline along the lower 15 miles of the river from Zug Island
downstream through the Trenton Channel to the mouth of Lake Erie. Major industries included
Harbortown Area Site Characterization Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Revision: 01
Page 1-3
December 2016
steel mills, petroleum refineries, electrical power generating plants, chemical manufacturing
plants, and automotive part manufacturers. The largest discharger to the river was the Detroit
Water and Sewerage Department, which discharged an average of 715 million gallons per day,
including waste from more than 700 industrial users. An additional 46 facilities discharged to
Detroit River tributaries. The river also received urban and industrial runoff directly and through
its tributaries and storm sewer systems (MDNR 1991).
Use of the river today is similar to 1991 except that there are fewer industries and wastewater
treatment plants. In the Michigan portion of the AOC, there are currently four municipal
drinking water intakes serving about 4.2 million people in nearly 127 communities.
Approximately 20 industries and power plants discharge cooling water and/or process water to
the river, and about 29 additional facilities discharge to the tributaries. There are five municipal
wastewater treatment plants. The Detroit Water and Sewerage Department is still the largest
discharger, discharging an average of 1.3 billion gallons per day, including waste from about
400 significant industrial users (EPA 2015).
The Stage 1 RAP and subsequent studies found that sediment contaminant concentrations in the
Detroit River are generally much greater along the Michigan shoreline compared to the mid-river
and Ontario shoreline (EPA 2015). The Michigan shoreline from the Rouge River downstream
through the Trenton Channel appears to be the most impacted. Contaminant distributions in
sediment reflect a combination of historical point sources and hydrological effects. Because
there is little lateral mixing in the Detroit River, contaminants in sediment are believed to deposit
according to longshore water flow following a longitudinal vector. This has resulted in high
contaminant levels in near-shore zones, particularly downstream of point sources and tributaries,
while large areas of the Detroit River exhibit moderate to low levels of contamination further
away from the Michigan shore (MDNR 1991).
Within the Harbortown Area, there are 14 known CSOs, 8 of which are uncontrolled
(Figure 1-3). Elevated PCBs in the upper Detroit River are believed to be associated with
discharge from some of these CSOs (Kenaga and Crum 1987). Historically, U.S. Rubber and
Parke Davis operated industrial facilities within the Harbortown Area, which discharged to the
Detroit River from five or six outfalls (Figure 1-3). These outfalls are believed to be currently
inactive (EPA 2015).
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 1-4
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
This page intentionally left blank
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 2-1
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
2. HARBORTOWN AREA SITE INVESTIGATION
The Harbortown Area site characterization was conducted in coordination with EPA. The
investigations, including all sampling activities and analytical testing methods, were carried out
in accordance with procedures outlined in the Harbortown FSP and QAPP (EA 2016b) for
locations HT16-01 through HT16-33. Three locations in the Harbortown Area (HBT15-A, -B,
and -C) were previously sampled during the Riverbend Area site characterization field effort
(October and November 2015) in accordance with the Riverbend Area Site Characterization
QAPP and FSP (EA 2016a). These three locations were sampled during the Riverbend Area site
characterization field effort so that these data could be used by MDNR to assist in the design of
the Milliken State Park shoreline habitat restoration project, a Detroit River AOC target habitat
restoration site (EPA 2015). The Assessment of Contaminated Sediment, Riverbend Area Site
Characterization (EA 2016c) presents the sampling narrative as it pertains to locations HBT15-
A, -B, and -C. The data for these locations are included and discussed in the following sections
of this report as part of the dataset for the Harbortown Area.
2.1 SAMPLING PROGRAM DESIGN AND RATIONALE
The site-specific QAPP details the project data quality objectives (DQOs) and outlines how the
sample collection program fulfills the project objectives (EA 2016b). Sampling was conducted
to delineate the nature and extent of sediment contamination in the Harbortown Area of the
Detroit River AOC. Samples from locations HT16-01 through HT16-33 were collected using a
sonic-coring system and ponar grab sampler provided and operated by Cascade Drilling, L.P.
(Cascade) from onboard a spud-barge owned and operated by Dean Marine Excavation (DME).
Samples from locations HBT15-A, -B, and -C were collected using a sonic coring system and
ponar grab sampler operated by Mateco Drilling Company onboard a spud-barge operated by
Marine Services, as described in the Riverbend Area Site Characterization Report(EA 2016c).
2.1.1 Sample Locations
The target sample locations for the Harbortown Area site characterization field effort were
chosen based on historical sampling data, location of historical and current outfalls (Figure 1-3),
water depth, proximity to the navigation channel, and input from MDEQ, which was received
prior to finalization of sample locations. The location of HT16-33 was determined by EPA
during the field event, and was located near the Riverbend Area site characterization sample
location RBI5-02 (EPA 2016c). Collection of one core and one ponar surface sample for
physical and chemical analysis was attempted at each location.
Figures 2-1A and 2-1B present the actual sample locations in the Harbortown Area. Variance
between the actual and target coordinates was calculated and documented, and are provided in
Table 2-1. Per EPA's instruction in the field, separate coordinates were recorded for surface
samples collected at locations HT 16-01 through HT16-33 because the ponar sampler was
deployed off the edge of the barge while cores were retrieved through the barge's moonpool, in
accordance with the QAPP (EA 2016b). Surface sample coordinates are provided in Table 2-2.
Sample locations that were moved or abandoned in the field are described in Section 2.8.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 2-2
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
2.1.2 Number of Samples
Sediment core samples were collected from all 36 sample locations in the Harbortown Area, and
ponar grabs were successfully collected at 35 locations. At EPA's request, two cores from
location HT16-18 were sub-sampled during processing because of comparative differences in
lithology despite their geographic proximity. Sediment core intervals were defined by
observable lithological changes. Sediment recovery varied from 6.0 ft to 20.0 ft (Table 2-3).
From the cores collected in the Harbortown Area, 109 sediment samples and 11 field duplicates
were submitted for analysis (Table 2-4). Tables 2-2 and 2-3 of the Riverbend Area Site
Characterization Report provide details of the sediment cores collected and analytical samples
submitted, respectively, for locations HBT15-A, -B, and -C (EA 2016c).
A ponar grab/dredge sampler was used to collect sample volume from the top 6 inches (0-0.5 ft)
of sediment at the 36 sample locations to support analysis of the uppermost interval. Sufficient
volume for analysis of the surface sample was collected at 35 of the 36 sample locations. A total
of 35 surface grab samples and 4 field duplicates were submitted for analysis. Table 2-3 of the
Riverbend Area Site Characterization Report provides details of the surficial samples submitted
for locations HBT15-A, -B, and -C (EA 2016c).
2.2 NAVIGATION AND SURVEY
DME used an onboard real time kinematic (RTK) global positioning system (GPS) receiver—
with a geodetic accuracy of 10 centimeters in the horizontal and 2 centimeters in the vertical
planes at an update frequency of 1 hertz—with a preloaded base map identifying target sample
locations to navigate to sample locations HT16-01 through HT16-33. Section 2.2 of the
Riverbend Area Site Characterization Report provides a detailed description of the field effort
navigation and survey methods used for locations HBT15-A, -B, and -C (EA 2016c).
The unit was checked for accuracy prior to use in accordance with EPA's Interim Guidance for
Developing Global Positioning System Data Collection Standard Operating Procedures and
Quality Assurance Project Plans (EPA 2008) and the procedures outlined in the Harbortown
Area site characterization QAPP (EA 2016b). Once the vessel had navigated to a sample
location, the sampling team visually confirmed that the proximal location or surroundings
matched the proposed location as shown on the proposed sample location map in the QAPP (EA
2016b) prior to sampling. Actual sample location coordinates were recorded on the field data
sheets and stored in the RTK GPS unit at the time of sampling. Target and actual sample
location coordinates are presented in Table 2-1.
2.3 SEDIMENT SAMPLING
Mobilization for the Harbortown Area sediment sampling effort commenced on 6 June 2016.
Sample collection was initiated on 7 June 2016 and continued through 15 June 2016. Staging for
the Harbortown Area field investigation took place at the historical stables in Belle Isle Park in
Detroit, Michigan. Level D personal protective equipment (i.e., safety glasses, work boots, and
nitrile gloves) were worn during core collection as necessary (EA 2016b). EA's standard
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Revision: 01
Page 2-3
December 2016
operating procedures (SOPs) 016 and 059 for maintaining field logbooks (Attachment A of the
FSP) were followed throughout sample collection and processing.
Locations HBT15-A, -B, and -C were sampled during the Riverbend Area sediment sampling
effort, which commenced on 26 October 2015 and continued through 5 November 2015.
Section 2.3 of the Riverbend Area Site Characterization Report provides a detailed description of
the sediment sampling effort as it pertains to locations HBT15-A, -B, and -C (EA 2016c).
2.3.1 Sonic Core Sampling
Cascade used a sonic-coring system to retrieve a total of 34 subsurface sediment cores that were
processed from sample locations HT16-01 through HT16-33. Mateco used a sonic coring system
to retrieve three subsurface sediment cores that were processed from sample locations HBT15-A,
-B, and -C, for a total of 37 cores that were processed and included in this SCR. The sonic-
coring system used by Cascade consisted of an 8140LC compact size track-mounted sonic rig
onboard DME's barge, a metal barrel, and Lexan core tubes. Two 5-ft-long, 3-inch inner
diameter Lexan core tubes were placed into the bottom of a 3-inch-diameter metal barrel
approximately 10 ft in length (comprised of two connected 5-ft-long barrels). A core catcher
was attached to the bottom of the metal barrel. A one-way valve was located at the top of the
barrel, above the core tubes, to allow water to exit the tube as sediment entered. The barrel was
lowered down into the sediment surface by attaching metal drill rods (2 or 5 ft in length) to the
top of the barrel. A sonic machine head, connected to a motor on the deck of the barge, was
placed at the top of the barrel.
The sonic machine head was utilized to move the barrel down 10 ft through the sediment or until
refusal was met, at which point the core was retrieved. Retrieval of sediment cores from
locations HT 16-02 and HT 16-23 extended to depths greater than 10 ft below sediment surface
(bss). At these locations, Cascade lowered a 4.25-inch-diameter hollow-stem auger into the hole
that had been created following retrieval of the initial 10-ft barrel. The hole was washed out with
water pumped from the river, and the metal barrel with new core liners was lowered through the
hollow-stem auger to the depth where the initial collection had ended: 10 ft bss. The sonic head
was then used to push the barrel an additional 10 ft. After retrieval, the core tubes were carefully
removed from the metal barrel and separated to prevent loss of sediment.
The sonic coring system used by Mateco is detailed in the Riverbend SCR (EA 2016c). Core
collection details for both field efforts are provided in Table 2-3.
After cores were collected by respective drilling companies, each core tube was capped at both
ends, sealed, and measured. Each core tube was also labeled with the location number, direction
of top and bottom of core, and date and time of retrieval. All sediment cores were stored upright
on the barge. At the end of each day, sediment cores were transferred to a refrigeration truck
(cooled to 4 degrees Celsius [°C]) at the onshore staging areas. The cores were stored upright in
the secured refrigeration truck until they could be processed. Appropriate holding times were
maintained for all samples. Field books and sample collection data sheets were prepared in
accordance with the procedures outlined in the FSP (EA 2016a and 2016b). A log of coring
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Revision: 01
Page 2-4
December 2016
activities, sampling locations, water depths, and core recoveries was recorded in a permanently
bound logbook in indelible ink. Personnel names, local weather conditions, and other
information that impacted the field sampling program were also recorded. Each page of the
logbook was numbered and dated by the personnel entering information. Copies of the field
logbooks are provided in Appendix A.
2.3.2 Ponar Grab Sampling
A total of 3 surface samples from locations HBT15-A, -B, and -C were successfully collected
using a ponar sampler as detailed in the Riverbend SCR (EA 2016c). A total of 32 surface
sediment samples from locations HT16-01 through HT16-33 were successfully collected using a
ponar sampler onboard DME's spud barge, for a total of 35 surface samples included in this
SCR. The ponar sampler was deployed and retrieved (mechanically or with the use of a davit) as
described in SOP 021 (EA 2016b). The sampler was deployed off the edge of the barge deck,
the sampler was retrieved, water at the top of the sampler was decanted, and sediment inside the
sampler was transferred into a disposable aluminum tray. Multiple deployments were sometimes
necessary to collect sufficient volume.
For each field effort, after ponar samples were retrieved, sediment for analysis of the ratio of
simultaneously extracted metals (SEM) to acid volatile sulfide (AVS) was placed into ajar
directly after sufficient volume for the surface sample was collected, and prior to
homogenization of the material to minimize aeration of the sample. Samples for SEM/AVS
analysis were filled with no headspace. Following collection of sediment for SEM/AVS, the
remaining sediment for all other analyses was thoroughly homogenized and then transferred
directly into laboratory-approved, labeled sample containers onboard the vessel. The surface
samples were stored in a cooler with ice onboard the barge until they were transferred to the
sample processing areas onshore and stored in a refrigeration truck (cooled to 4 °C) until transit
to laboratory facilities.
2.3.3 Sediment Core Processing
Sediment core sample processing for the Harbortown Area field effort was performed at a
temporary staging location at the historical stables in Belle Isle Park in Detroit, Michigan.
Sample locations HBT15-A, -B, and -C were processed at the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers'
facility at Historic Fort Wayne in Detroit, Michigan, as described in Section 2.3.3 of the
Riverbend Area Site Characterization Report (EA 2016c). At the processing facility, cores were
split length-wise, photographed, and lithologically logged. Sediments were classified in general
accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System under ASTM International Standard
D2487-11. Sediment logging activities were performed in accordance with SOP 016
(Attachment A of the FSP, EA 2016b).
After photographing and completing the core's lithologic log, interval-dedicated decontaminated
spatulas or spoons were used to remove sediment from the designated sample intervals within a
core and place in clean, disposable aluminum trays. Prior to sample collection, sample interval
material was homogenized by mixing until consistency was uniform. Cores were generally
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Revision: 01
Page 2-5
December 2016
sampled at two-foot intervals. This was altered if there was a distinct change in lithology or
there was visible contamination. Sediment samples were packaged and shipped in accordance
with EA SOPs (EA 2016a and 2016b). Re-used equipment (e.g., cutting tools, broad knife,
spatula, etc.) was decontaminated in accordance with the decontamination procedures described
in Section 2.6. Lithologic and photographic logs of sediment cores are included in Appendix B
and Appendix C, respectively.
2.4 ANALYTICAL PROGRAM
The analytical program is summarized in Table 2-4. With a few exceptions due to inadequate
sample volume (as detailed in Section 3.2.1), Harbortown Area sediment samples underwent the
following analyses:
• 34 PAHs
• Michigan 10 metals (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury,
selenium, silver, and zinc) plus iron and nickel
• PCBs (Aroclors)
• Total organic carbon (TOC)
• Percent solids/moisture.
In addition to the above analytical parameters, surface sediment samples (0-0.5 ft interval) were
analyzed for:
• SEM/AVS
• Diesel range organics (DRO)
• Oil range organics (ORO)
• Grain size
• Ammonia (locations HBT15-A, -B, and -C only).
These additional analyses were performed on the surface sediment samples because the data they
yield are useful for assessing toxicity to organisms that typically contact only the surface
sediments. Matrix spike (MS)/matrix spike duplicate (MSD) samples were not collected for
percent solids or grain size.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Revision: 01
Page 2-6
December 2016
2.5 SAMPLE HANDLING, CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY, AND QUALITY
ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL
2.5.1 Sample Handling, Chain-of-Custody, and Documentation
Sediment samples analyzed for PCBs (Aroclors), 34 PAHs, total Michigan metals (arsenic,
barium, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury, selenium, silver, and zinc) plus iron and
nickel, TOC, percent solids, SEM/AVS, DRO, ORO, ammonia, and grain size were picked up
from the site sample processing facility by TestAmerica's courier and shipped to TestAmerica's
laboratory in Burlington, Vermont. Samples were placed in the appropriate sample containers
(obtained from TestAmerica), preserved, and labeled in accordance with the QAPP/FSP (EA
2016b). With exception given to sediment collected for SEM/AVS analysis, sediments within an
interval were mixed to uniform consistency to homogenize prior to placing in jars. Sediment
sampled for SEM/AVS analysis was placed directly into jars after sufficient surface sample
volume was collected, prior to homogenization. SEM/AVS samples were filled without head
space. In preparation for shipment to the laboratories, all samples were packaged in accordance
with the procedures outlined in the FSP (EA 2016b).
Sample labeling was performed in accordance with SOP 001 (Attachment A of the FSP, EA
2016b). Individual sample containers were labeled with a unique designation that corresponded
to the specific geographic location, year of collection, and subsample depth interval. The FSP
(EA 2016b) outlines the specific sample identification procedures that were implemented.
Sample identifications included the location (HBT or HT for Harbortown), the year of sampling
(15 or 16 for 2015 or 2016), the location number, and either "-SURF" for surface samples or the
interval from the core in feet. An example of a sample identifier is "HT16-22-3050," which
describes a sample collected from the Harbortown Area in 2016 at location 22 at the depth
interval of 3-5 ft bss. Sample intervals within the core were in the field based on lithological
features, visual or olfactory signs of contamination, and guidance from EPA. Field duplicates
(FD) were designated by adding "FD" to the end of the sample identifier. MS/MSDs were
designated by adding "MS" or "MSD" to the end of the sample identifier. For example:
HT 16-23-103 0-FD or HB T15 - A- SURF -M S.
Chain-of-custody forms were completed and used to track samples from the time of sampling to
the arrival of samples at the laboratory. Completed chain-of-custody forms are provided in
Appendix A (available electronically) of the Data Usability Assessment Report (EA 2016d).
2.5.2 Quality Control
Throughout the project, various measures were implemented to help facilitate the overall quality
and usability of the collected data. The field investigation activities included collection of
additional quality control samples (e.g., duplicates, MS/MSD, etc.) sufficient to meet the
requirements of the DQOs as defined in Section A.7 of the QAPP (EA 2016b). Duplicate
samples were submitted as described in the FSP, and field and laboratory quality control
requirements were completed in accordance with Section B .5 of the QAPP (EA 2016b).
Deviations from the QAPP/FSP can be found in Section 2.8.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 2-7
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
2.6 DECONTAMINATION
Decontamination procedures were implemented during the field investigation to prevent cross-
contamination between sampling locations. During sampling activities, disposable or dedicated
sampling tools and materials were utilized whenever possible to minimize the decontamination
effort. Decontamination procedures were carried out in accordance with the SOPs presented in
Attachment A of the FSP (EA 2016b).
2.7 INVESTIGATION-DERIVED WASTE
Following collection of the sediment samples, investigation-derived waste was managed in
accordance with the procedures described in the SOPs presented in Attachment A of the FSP
(EA 2016b). In general, residual sediments and decontamination water were collected,
drummed, and disposed of offsite in accordance with the EA SOPs. Water used for
decontamination of the sampling equipment on DME's spud barge was allowed to drain back
into the river at each respective sampling location. Disposable materials and personal protective
equipment that came into contact with site sediments were bagged and disposed of as general
municipal waste.
2.8 DEVIATIONS FROM THE QAPP AND FSP
2.8.1 Sampling Locations
Thirty-six sample locations within the Harbortown Area were originally chosen based on
historical sampling data, location of historic and current outfalls, water depth, and input from
MDEQ (Table 2-1).
Of the 36 actual sample locations in the Harbortown Area, 25 were more than 10 ft from the
target sample location (Table 2-1). Per the QAPP, sample locations could be adjusted up to 33 ft
(10 meters) to allow for accessibility. Of the 25 locations that were more than 10 ft from the
target sample location, 10 locations were moved more than 33 ft from the target sample location
(HBT15-B, HBT15-C, and HT16-01, -05, -10, -12, -18, -19, -23, and -25); EPA was aware of
and approved these location moves. Table 2-1 presents coordinates for the target and the actual
locations, as well as the distance between the actual and target locations.
Eight locations (HBT15-B, HBT15-C, and HT16-10, -23, -28, -29, -31, and -32) were moved
from the target location to avoid nearshore obstructions such as riprap, large rocks, and seawall.
Five sample locations (HT16-08, -12, -17, -19, and -25) were moved because the target location
was in a slip or marina that the barge could not access due to size constraints, shallow water
depths, or pilings. Four locations (HT16-03, -04, -14, and -24) were more than 10 ft from the
target sample location because either strong winds or current impaired the barge operator's
ability to maneuver and settle spuds within 10 ft of the target location. Three locations (FIT 16-
07, -15, and -21) were offset more than 10 ft from the target location because the position of the
moonpool on the barge—approximately 20 ft from port and starboard—prevented sampling
directly at target locations close to shore. Locations FIT 16-16 and -27 were shifted more than
Harbortown Area Site Characterization Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 2-8
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
10 ft from the target location to avoid re-sampling a location of a failed attempt (core recovery
less than 70 percent). Locations HT16-01 and HT16-05 were moved to avoid utilities in the area
of the target location. Per EPA's instruction in the field, location HT16-18 was moved closer to
the Parke Davis outfall after visible contamination was observed at HT16-16.
2.8.2 Sample Recovery
Sediment penetration and recovery of the cores, as observed through the clear core liner, were
recorded on a field data collection form for each location. The recovery value was also verified
immediately prior to processing to ensure sediment had settled in core tubes that were partially
full. Sediment penetration and recovery of the cores used for chemical analysis are presented in
Table 2-3.
Core recovery did not meet or exceed 70 percent after at least three attempts at HBT15-B
(maximum recovery of 60 percent), HT16-02 (maximum recovery of 66 percent), and HT16-18
(maximum recovery of 63 percent) (Table 2-3).
At locations HT 16-02 and HT 16-23, penetration depth exceeded 10 ft. Sediment cores at these
two locations were collected to 20 ft bss at EPA's request; details on the collection are presented
Section 2.1.1. At location HT 16-02, cores were collected to ensure the full depth of soft
sediment was collected by verifying clay was encountered. Although recovery was less than
70 percent, the core was collected and used as it was the best recovery out of five attempts. At
location HT16-23, a core was collected to 20 ft bss after non-aqueous phase liquid was observed
on the outside of the core at 10 ft bss. Number of attempts at each location are included in the
field logbook and field data sheets in Appendix A; details of the cores that were processed and
submitted for analysis are presented in Table 2-3.
Surface samples were collected at 35 of the 36 sample locations (Tables 2-2 and 2-3). No
surface sediment was retrieved at location HT16-10 after five ponar grab sample attempts. After
multiple ponar grab attempts at locations HT16-11 and HT 16-29, the collected sediment volume
was not sufficient for the full suite of planned analyses; volume for grain size analysis was not
submitted at these locations.
2.8.3 Sample Processing and Analytical Program
In accordance with the QAPP, sediment core intervals were defined by observable lithological
changes. Per EPA's direction during the field investigation, sediment core intervals were also
defined by visible or olfactory signs of contamination (e.g., non-aqueous phase liquid, sheen,
hydrocarbon odor). Table 2-4 presents the actual analytical program, including the start and end
of each sample interval.
At location HT16-23, sediment was collected to 20 ft bss through two 10-ft cores (0-10 ft and
10-20 ft); as described in Section 2.1.1. The 0-10 ft core at HT16-23 had visual evidence of
contamination within the 0-0.5 ft interval only; however, two intervals in the 10-20 ft core also
had visual evidence of contamination. Sample intervals HT16-23-1001100 (10-11 ft interval)
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Revision: 01
Page 2-9
December 2016
and HT16-23-110130 (11-13 ft interval) were given the added designation of "DS" for
drawdown slough after it was determined that the visual evidence of contamination and
associated highly disturbed sediment within the intervals were likely drawdown. As determined
by EPA in the field based on the location of visible and olfactory signs of contamination within
the core as well as the core's lithology, intervals submitted for analysis at HT16-23 included:
0.0-0.5,0.5-1.5, 1.5-3.5,9.0-10.0, 10.0-11.0, 11.0-13.0, and 15.0-16.0 ft bss. Sediment intervals
are documented in the field data collection forms (Appendix A), lithologic logs (Appendix B),
and the photographic log (Appendix C).
The QAPP specified that one sediment core from each sample location would be sampled. Per
EPA's direction during the field investigation, the cores resulting from the second and third
attempts at location HT16-18—HT16-18B and HT16-18C, respectively—were sampled
separately. EPA requested these two cores be sampled separately because of comparative
differences in lithology despite their geographic proximity.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 2-10
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
This page intentionally left blank
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 3-1
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
3. RESULTS
3.1 DATA EVALUATION
The overall DQO for the project was to provide data of known and documented quality to
characterize current site conditions in the Harbortown Area. Data collected from the Harbortown
Area were validated by evaluating the completeness, correctness, and conformance of the data
set against the method, SOP, or contract requirements documented in the QAPP/FSP (EA
2016b). The data review and validation achieved the project goals. The overall data review and
validation program attained the project objectives with no adverse effects on data quality or
usability (EA 2016d).
To address the goals of this assessment, the validated data collected under this investigation were
compared to the consensus-based threshold effects concentrations (TECs) and the probable
effects concentrations (PECs) of the Sediment Quality Guidelines (SQGs) where available
(MacDonald et al. 2000; Persaud et al. 1993; EPA 2003b, 2005; Wisconsin Department of
Natural Resources [WDNR] 2003). A PEC has not been developed for total petroleum
hydrocarbon (TPH) (DRO + ORO), but the DRO and ORO results were compared to Sample-
Specific Risk Screening Level (SSRSLs). Equilibrium Partitioning Sediment Benchmarks
Toxicity Units (ESBTUs) were calculated to estimate whether there is potential ecological risk
associated with exposure to pore water that is in equilibrium with a measured concentration of
the contaminant in the sediment. Probable effects concentration quotients (PEC-Qs) are used to
evaluate the combined effects of chemical mixtures on the toxicity of sediments to benthic
organisms against mean PEC quotients or benchmarks (mean quotients of 0.1, 0.5, 1, and 5)
(Ingersoll et al. 2001). Contaminant concentrations exceeding the applicable SQGs, SSRLSs,
ESBTUs, or PEC-Qs were identified. Figures have been prepared to visually present
contaminant concentrations and identify potential hot spots or focus areas within the study area.
Detected values equal to or greater than the Method Detection Limit, but less than the laboratory
RL, were J-qualified and are estimated. Analytes that were not detected were U-qualified. Field
duplicate results are presented in the analytical tables but are not included in the bulk sediment
results figures.
3.1.1 Comparison to Sediment Quality Guidelines
The SQGs were developed as informal (non-regulatory) guidelines for use in interpreting
chemical data from analyses of sediments. Several biological-effects approaches have been used
to assess freshwater sediment quality relative to the potential for adverse effects on benthic
organisms, including the TEC/PEC (MacDonald et al. 2000) approach. The TEC and PEC levels
were derived using concentrations with both effects and no observed effects (MacDonald et al.
2000). TECs typically represent concentrations below which adverse biological effects are
unlikely to be observed, while PECs typically represent concentrations above which adverse
effects are likely to be observed (MacDonald et al. 2000). Concentrations that are between the
TEC and PEC represent the concentrations at which adverse biological effects occasionally
occur. TEC and PEC levels for iron were not available from the MacDonald et al. document,
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 3-2
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
and only a TEC value was provided for silver. Therefore, iron concentrations in sediment from
the Harbortown Area were compared to the TEC and PEC values for iron documented in the
Ontario effect-based freshwater SQGs (Persaud et al. 1993), and silver concentrations were
compared to TEC and PEC values for silver documented in draft criteria for managing
contaminated sediment in British Columbia (MacDonald and MacFarlane 1999). These iron and
silver benchmarks were recommended for use by MDEQ and EPA, and they also appear in
guidance from the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR 2003).
3.1.2 Calculation of Total Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Total Polychlorinated
Biphenyls
When calculating total PAHs, results that were J-qualified were calculated using the result value,
and results that were U-qualified were calculated using one-half the RL. Substituting one-half
the RL (not detected [ND] = V2 RL) for each non-detect provides a conservative estimate of the
concentration. This method, however, tends to produce results that are biased high, especially in
data sets where many samples are non-detects. This overestimation is important to consider
when comparing calculated total values to guidelines. Total PCBs results often have a
significant number of non-detects. Additionally, individual PCB Aroclors represent mixtures
of PCB congeners, creating the potential for double counting. For these reasons, total PCB
concentrations were calculated by summing the concentrations of each PCB Aroclor with
non-detects set equal to zero (ND = 0) to reduce the potential for overestimation.
3.1.3 Ratio of Simultaneously Extracted Metals to Acid Volatile Sulfide
The bioavailability of divalent metals to aquatic organisms is influenced by the presence of AVS.
In low oxygenated (anaerobic) environments, divalent metals precipitate as metal sulfides,
making them unavailable for uptake by aquatic organisms. Using this method, six metals
(cadmium, copper, lead, nickel, mercury, and zinc) were extracted, measured, converted to units
of micromoles per gram (|imol/g) and added together (including any values that were J-qualified)
to determine the amount of SEM. If a metal was not detected, it was considered a zero in the
calculation. SEM was then compared to the amount of AVS detected (units of |imol/g) in the
same sediment sample. If AVS was not detected in the sample, the SEM/AVS ratio was not
calculated.
A SEM/AVS ratio less than 1 indicates a high degree of probability that the metals are bound as
metal sulfides and not bioavailable to aquatic organisms. If the SEM/AVS ratio is greater than 1,
then the metals in sediment exceed the sulfide binding ability and have a higher probability of
being bioavailable to aquatic organisms.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 3-3
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
While the SEM/AVS ratio provides information on bioavailability, it does not always inform
toxicity. Metal toxicity is evaluated through an indirect estimate of bioavailability based on the
concentrations of AVS and SEM, as well as TOC in the sediments. Metal ESBTUs were
calculated following the methods outlined in Procedures for the Derivation of Equilibrium
Partitioning Sediment Benchmarks (ESBs) for the Protection ofBenthic Organisms: Metal
Mixtures (Cadmium, Copper, Lead, Nickel, Silver, and Zinc) (EPA 2005). The molar
concentration of AVS was subtracted from the molar concentration of the sum of the SEM
measured in each sediment sample, and the result was divided by the fraction of organic carbon,
accounting for preferential sorption of metals to organic carbon. It should be noted that if the
particular sample has excess AVS such that all SEM is accounted for, this value can be negative.
As presented in the EPA 2005 guidance, when metals ESBTUs are calculated using this method,
a value less than 130 micromoles (|imol) of residual SEM per gram organic carbon (goc)
indicates that the sediment poses a low risk of adverse biological effects associated with metals.
Values between 130 and 3,000 |imol/goc may have adverse effects, and values greater than
3,000 |iinol/goc are expected to be associated with adverse effects. Details of the metals ESBTU
calculation and results are presented in Chapter 4.
3.1.4 Equilibrium Partitioning Sediment Benchmark Toxic Units
Equilibrium Partitioning Sediment Benchmark Toxicity Units (ESBTUs) were utilized to
estimate whether there is potential ecological risk associated with exposure to pore water that is
in equilibrium with a measured concentration of a contaminant in the sediment. Typically, a
PAH ESBTU less than or equal to 1 indicates that benthic organisms are not expected to be
harmed by contamination present in the sediments (EPA 2003a). The PAH ESBTU benchmark
of 7.5 is based on the preliminary remediation goal (PRG) for PAHs developed for the Lower
Rouge River Old Channel (LRROC) Great Lakes Legacy Act site, which is also located within
the Detroit River AOC (AMEC et al. 2013). The LRROC PRG is based on the Sediment
Contaminant Bioavailability Alliance (SCBA) dataset (Geiger 2010), which is a widely accepted
sediment assessment tool comprised of over 250 samples from 18 sediment sites where PAHs
were the source of contamination. The dataset was used to evaluate risk to sensitive species
(Hyalella azteca, freshwater amphipod) in the benthic community based on pore water exposure.
The LRROC PRG was used for comparison based on guidance provided by MDEQ and EPA.
Eighty percent survivability is a typical level of acceptability for benthic organisms exposed to
pore water from contaminated sediments. The LRROC PRG was established at 85 percent
survivability based on SCBA toxicity results from the 28-day Hyalella test. Based on a
correlation using the SCBA dataset, 85 percent survivability correlated with a level of 5 toxic
units; however, most sediment chemistry samples are based on analysis of bulk sediments. For
the LRROC site, in order to arrive at a bulk sediment toxic unit equal to 5 toxic units in pore
water, a relationship was established between pore water and bulk sediment based on site-
specific PAH samples. The result was that a toxic unit of 7.5 in bulk sediments was found to be
equal to 5 toxic units in pore water. Details of the ESBTU calculations and results are presented
in Chapter 4.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 3-4
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
3.1.5 Probable Effects Concentration Quotients
Probable effects concentration quotients (PEC-Qs) were used to evaluate the combined effects of
chemical mixtures on the toxicity of sediments to benthic organisms against mean PEC quotients
or benchmarks (mean quotients of 0.1, 0.5, 1 and 5) (Ingersoll et al. 2001). The PEC-Qs
combine data from multiple constituents in sediments into one unit-less index, and thus are
useful in comparing the quality of sediments from different locations and at different times (EPA
2000). A benchmark PEC-Q of 0.5 was used because the proportion of organisms that show
toxic effect drops to 6-35 percent when a geometric mean of the PEC-Q of 0.5 is used, meaning
that between 94 percent and 65 percent of organisms do not show a toxic effect when the PEC-Q
is 0.5 (Ingersoll et. al. 2001). Details of the PEC-Q calculations and results are presented in
Chapter 5.
3.2 RESULTS FROM THE HARBORTOWN AREA SEDIMENT INVESTIGATION
For reporting and visual presentation of the results of the sediment investigation, the Harbortown
Area was divided into four areas. Area A contains 4 sample locations, HT16-01 through -04,
which lie on the east bank of the Detroit River proximal to Belle Isle; Area B begins just south of
the MacArthur Bridge and extends along the western bank of the Detroit River, including 10
sample locations, HT16-05 through -14 (Figure 2-1A) (Figure 2-1A). Area C continues where
Area B ends, contains 18 locations, (HT16-16 through HT16-30 and HBT15-A, -B, and -C)
(Figure 2-1B). Area D is located further upstream on the western bank and contains one sample
location, HT16-33 (Figure 2-1B). This location was determined in the field and was selected to
supplement data presented in the Riverbend SCR (EA 2016c).
3.2.1 Sample Recovery
One core was collected and processed from each of the 33 locations during the 2016 Harbortown
field effort with the exception of location HT16-18, where two cores (HT16-18B and HT16-18C)
were processed at the request of EPA for a total of 34 cores processed in 2016. Two cores at
HT16-18, HT16-18B and HT16-18C, were both visibly contaminated; however, each had
varying lithology that was of interest. One core was collected and processed from HBT15-A, -B,
and -C. Core recovery did not meet or exceed 70 percent after at least three attempts at HBT15-
B (maximum recovery of 60 percent). These locations were sampled in 2015 during the
Riverbend field effort but are within the Harbortown area and are included in this report, for a
total of 37 cores which are discussed in the following sections. Core recovery did not meet or
exceed 70 percent after at least three attempts at HT16-02 (maximum recovery of 66 percent)
and HT16-18 (maximum recovery of 63 percent). Ponar surface samples were collected at 32 of
the 33 sample locations in 2016 and each of the 3 sample locations in 2015 for a total of 35
surface samples included and discussed in the following sections. No surface sediment was
retrieved at location HT16-10 after five ponar grab sample attempts. After multiple ponar grab
attempts at locations HT16-11 and HT 16-29, the collected sediment volume was not sufficient
for the full suite of planned analyses; volume for grain size/percent moisture analysis was not
submitted at these locations.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 3-5
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
Core collection attempts were targeted to reach a depth of 10 ft or clay, whichever occurred first.
Two exceptions to this were HT16-02 and HT16-23, which cores were collected to
20 ft at the request of EPA due to visible contamination at 10 ft. Sediment recovery ranged from
6.0 ft (HBT15-B) to 20.0 ft (HT16-23) (Table 2-3). Detailed lithographic descriptions of the 37
collected cores are presented in Appendix B.
3.2.2 Lithology
The sediment cores collected within the Harbortown Area demonstrated core profiles containing
sediment types consistent with a fluvial system with a strong current. Most cores were
characterized by relatively thin layers of fine-grained material and some sand or gravel but were
mainly comprised of stiff to semi-stiff clay. Native and non-native material such as shells, roots
and organic material, and organic and hydrocarbon odors were observed within various sediment
types and depths. Complete core logs and photographs are included in Appendix B and
Appendix C, respectively. A general description of cores collected during the investigation is
included in the text that follows.
Area A
A total of 4 cores were collected in Area A along the shore of Belle Isle. Cores collected in
Area A showed a general pattern of soft sediment, usually silt or silty-clay, in the top 1-2 ft
underlain by gray stiff to semi-stiff clay. HT16-04 did not have any visible soft sediment and
was comprised entirely of gray clay.
Area B
The 9 cores collected in Area B had a similar lithological pattern as Area B including thin soft-
sediment layers at the top underlain by semi-stiff to stiff gray clay. Several cores had pebbles
and cobbles within the soft sediment. Hydrocarbon odor was observed in the following cores:
HT16-05, -07, -10, -11, -12, -13, and -14. Non-aqueous phase liquid (NAPL) was observed in
HT16-07 as well as an unknown light blue/white material with a wet chalky consistency. It was
tested for pH in the field and had a value of 12. Similar material has been previously found in
other areas of the Detroit and Rouge rivers and has been identified as a calcium carbonate
byproduct of the Solvay process.
Area C
Similarly to Areas A and B, the 19 cores collected in Area C were dominated by thick layers of
semi-stiff to stiff gray clay underlying softer sediment at the surface, sometimes including sand,
pebbles, and/or gravel. HT16-22, -23, -24, -26, and -31 had no observable soft sediment and
were composed entirely of fat gray clay. Hydrocarbon odor was observed in the following
cores: HT16-15, -16, -17, -18B, -18C, -19, -20, -27, -28, -29, and -30, and HBT15-A, -B,
and -C. NAPL was observed in HT16-16, -18B, -18C, and -23. A light blue/white material
similar to what was observed in HT16-07 was also seen in HT16-19. Of particular note, the core
liner containing HT16-16 was compromised by the sample within it. It was processed
Harbortown Area Site Characterization Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Revision: 01
Page 3-6
December 2016
approximately 12 hours after collection, and the core liner had thinned and had visible fractures
to the point where the core cracked in half when trying to move it. Two cores from HT16-18
(HT16-18B and -18C) were prioritized and processed quickly after collection due to similar
noticeable liner degradation.
HT16-33 had some lithologic properties similar to the core collected proximal to it (RB15-02)
during the 2015 Riverbend field effort with clayey sand at the surface underlain by fat gray clay.
However, the core collected at HT16-33 did not share the layer of black sand with strong
hydrocarbon odor that was observed in some of the cores collected previously in this area
(EA 2016c)
3.2.3 Bulk Sediment Results
From the 36 sample locations, 15 field duplicates and 144 sediment samples were submitted
for 34 PAHs, total Michigan metals plus iron and nickel, PCB Aroclors, and TOC analyses;
142 sediment samples and 15 field duplicates were submitted for percent moisture analysis;
35 sediment samples and 4 field duplicates were submitted for SEM/AVS, DRO, and ORO
analyses; 33 sediment samples and 4 field duplicates were submitted for grain size analysis; and
3 sediment samples were submitted for ammonia analysis (Table 2-4). A summary of the
screening criteria, number of exceedances, and maximum values for each constituent is provided
in Table 3-1.
Chicago Bridge & Iron Company's Quality Assurance Technical Support Program was
subcontracted by EPA to conduct a 100 percent Tier I and 20 percent Tier II data validation
verification check for this project. The Tier I and Tier II reviews were performed according to
the National Functional Guidelines for Superfund Organics Method Data Review (EPA 2014a)
and National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Superfund Data Review (EPA 2014b).
Electronic data validation was performed within GLNPO's eXchange and Evaluation System
prior to review by Chicago Bridge & Iron Company's Quality Assurance Technical Support
Program (EA 2016b). To assess compliance with the Laboratory Statement of Work, data
validation included completeness and compliance checks, data assessment, and validation at
Stage 2 following Guidance for Labeling Externally Validated Laboratory Analytical Data for
Superfund Use (EPA 2009).
3.2.3.1 Grain Size, Particle Size, and Density
Analytical results for grain size, particle size, and density are presented in Table 3-2. These
results provide additional data for characterizing sediments that can be useful in subsequent
investigations or to support potential remediation efforts. A total of 37 surface (0-0.5 ft) samples
(including field duplicates) were submitted for grain size analysis. Of the total samples,
19 (51 percent) were composed primarily (greater than 50 percent) of silt and clay. Silt and clay
content in samples ranged from 1.3 percent (HBT15-C-SURF) to 98.0 percent (HT16-28-SURF).
Area D
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Revision: 01
Page 3-7
December 2016
Fifteen of the surface grab samples were comprised of at least 65 percent sand
(HT16-02, -05, -06, -09, -14, -16, -20, -21, -21-FD, -22, -23, -32, -30, -33, and HBT15-B,), with
the highest percentage (89.7 percent) at HT16-16. HT16-27 had the highest percentage of gravel
in the surface grab sample (52.2 percent). The surface grab sample with the highest percentage
of silt and clay was collected at location HT16-26 (96.7 percent). Particle size distribution
graphs for each sample are presented in Appendix D.
3.2.3.2 Ammonia
Ammonia results for the Harbortown Area locations that were sampled previously during the
Riverbend field effort in 2015 are provided in Table 3-3. Ammonia concentrations ranged from
a minimum of 8 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) in the surface grab sample at HBT15-C to a
maximum of 140 mg/kg in the surface grab sample from HBT15-A. Ammonia was not detected
at HBT15-B. Ammonia data were collected as part of the Riverbend site characterization due to
the concerns of MDEQ regarding historical sources of ammonia in the area.
3.2.3.3 PCB Aroclors
PCB Aroclors data and total PCB (ND = 0) concentrations are presented in Table 3-4.
Figure 3-1A shows the distribution of total PCB SQG exceedances (TEC is 59.8 micrograms per
kilogram [|ig/kg]; PEC is 676 |ig/kg) in Areas A and B, and Figure 3-1B shows the distribution
of total PCB SQG exceedances in Areas C and D. Results from the surface grab samples
(0-0.5 ft interval) are shown on the aerial photo and results from the core depth intervals are
shown on the associated graphs. The most frequently detected Aroclors were Aroclor 1254 (106
detections in 159 samples, 67 percent), Aroclor 1260 (95 detections in 159 samples, 60 percent),
and Aroclor 1242 (18 detections in 159 samples, 11 percent).
In Area A, none of the surface grab samples had a total PCB concentration greater than the TEC
values. In the core samples, the concentration of total PCB Aroclors was between the TEC and
the PEC in one depth interval from HT 16-02; none of the total PCB concentrations in the core
intervals from Area A exceeded the PEC.
In Area B, the total PCB concentration in the grab surface sample from HT16-11 exceeded three
times the PEC, and the remaining locations had total PCB concentrations in the grab surface
samples that were less than the PEC. The surface sample from HT16-11 had the highest total
PCB concentration detected in the Harbortown area (41,350 |ig/kg). In the core samples, HT16-
11 had a maximum total PCB concentration in at least one depth interval that was between the
PEC and two times the PEC, and the remaining locations had total PCB concentrations in the
subsurface intervals that were each below the PEC.
Area A
Area B
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 3-8
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
Area C
In two of the grab surface samples, total PCB concentrations were greater than three times the
PEC (HT16-20 and HT16-22); in four surface samples total PCB concentrations were between
the PEC and two times the PEC (HT16-21, -23, -31, and -32); and in the remaining locations,
total PCB concentrations were less than the PEC. In the core samples, five locations had a
maximum total PCB concentration in at least one depth interval that was greater than three times
the PEC (HT16-16, -18C, -19, -30, and HBT15-A); HT16-18B had a maximum total PCB
concentration in at least one depth interval that was between two times and three times the PEC;
four locations had a maximum total PCB concentration in at least one depth interval that was
between the PEC and two times the PEC (HT16-20, -21, -23, and HBT15-B); and the core
samples from the remaining locations each had total PCB concentrations that were less than the
PEC. The maximum total PCB concentration detected in the subsurface samples in the
Harbortown area was at HT16-19 in the 0-1 ft interval (5,000 |ig/kg).
Area D
The surface sample from HT16-33 had a total PCB concentration that was between the PEC and
two times the PEC. The maximum total PCB concentration in the core samples was greater than
three times the PEC.
3.2.3.4 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
PAH data and total 17 PAHs (ND = '/2 RL) and total 34 PAHs (ND= V2 RL) are presented in
Table 3-5. Total PAHs were calculated using both 17 individual PAHs and 34 individual PAHs;
however, the total 17 PAHs were used as a comparison threshold to be consistent with the
derivation of the TEC/PEC values. Figure 3-2A shows the distribution of total 17 PAHs SQG
exceedances (TEC is 1,610 |ig/kg; PEC is 22,800 |ig/kg) in Areas A and B, and Figure 3-2B
shows the distribution of total 17 PAHs SQG exceedances in Areas C and D. Results from the
surface grab samples (0-0.5 ft interval) are shown on the aerial photo, and results from the core
depth intervals are shown on the associated graphs.
Area A
In Area A, two of the four locations had surface grab samples with a total 17 PAHs concentration
less than the TEC; HT16-01 and -02 had a concentration between the TEC and the PEC. In the
core samples, HT16-02 was the only location with subsurface depth intervals that exceeded the
TEC; the maximum total 17 PAHs concentration at that location in the subsurface samples was
between the PEC and two times the PEC.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 3-9
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
Area B
In Area B, five surface grab samples had total 17 PAHs concentrations that were between
three times and ten times the PEC (HT16-05, -06, -07, -09, and -11); HT16-14 had a total
17 PAHs concentration that was between the PEC and two times the PEC; and the remaining
locations had surface grab samples with total 17 PAHs concentrations that were less than the
PEC. In the core samples, four locations had a maximum 17 PAHs concentration in at least one
depth interval that was greater than ten times the PEC (HT16-07, -11, -12, and -13); two
locations had a maximum 17 PAHs concentration in at least one depth interval that was between
three times and ten times the PEC (HT16-05 and -14); HT16-09 had a maximum 17 PAHs
concentration in at least one depth interval that was between two times and three times the PEC,
and the remaining locations had subsurface samples with total 17 PAHs concentrations that were
less than the PEC.
Area C
In Area C, the surface grab sample at HT16-31 had a total 17 PAHs concentration greater than
ten times the PEC; two locations had total 17 PAHs concentrations between three times and
ten times the PEC (HT16-22 and HBT15-C); three locations had total 17 PAHs concentrations
between two times and three times the PEC (HT 16-20, -21, and -30); and the remaining locations
had total 17 PAHs concentrations in the surface grab sample that were between the TEC and
PEC. The maximum total 17 PAHs concentration detected in the surface grab samples in the
Harbortown area was atHT16-31 (1,029,600 |ig/kg).
In the core samples, eight locations had a maximum 17 PAHs concentration in at least one depth
interval that was greater than ten times the PEC (HT16-16, -18B, -18C, -19, -23, -29, -30, and
HBT15-B); six locations had a maximum 17 PAHs concentration in at least one depth interval
that was between three times and ten times the PEC (HT16, -15, -17, -20 -28, HBT15-A and -C);
HT 16-27 had at a maximum total 17 PAHs concentration in at least one depth interval that was
between the PEC and two times the PEC; and the remaining locations had subsurface intervals
with total 17 PAHs concentrations that were below the PEC. The maximum total 17 PAHs
concentration detected in the subsurface samples in the Harbortown area was at HT16-23 in the
0-0.5 ft interval (6,267,000 |ig/kg).
Area D
In Area D, the surface grab sample at HT16-33 had a total 17 PAHs concentration that was
between the PEC and two times the PEC, and the maximum total 17 PAHs concentration in the
subsurface samples was greater than ten times the PEC in at least one depth interval.
3.2.3.5 Total Organic Carbon
TOC results are provided in Table 3-6. In addition to providing additional data for
characterizing sediments, TOC results are utilized in the calculation of metals ESBTUs, as
discussed in Section 4.2. In the surface grab samples, TOC ranged from 1,610 mg/kg
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Revision: 01
Page 3-10
December 2016
(0.160 percent) at HT16-18, located in Area C, to 54,300 mg/kg (5.43 percent) at location
HBT15-A, also located in Area C. For the core samples, TOC ranged from 1,600 mg/kg
(0.16 percent) at HT16-06 in the 0-lft interval, located in Area B, to 203,000 mg/kg
(20.3 percent) at HBT15-B in the 3-5.5 ft interval, located in Area C.
3.2.3.6 Metals
Metal results were compared to respective TEC and PEC values and are presented in Table 3-6
(MacDonald et al. 2000 and WDNR 2003). Of the 12 analyzed metals, 2 (barium and selenium)
do not have TEC or PEC values; therefore, these metals are not discussed in this section and
were not included in the spatial analysis for the site (Chapter 6).
The detected concentrations for each metal compared with TEC/PEC values at each location are
displayed in the following figures: Figures 3-3A and 3-3B (arsenic), Figures 3-4A and 3-4B
(cadmium), Figures 3-5A and 3-5B (chromium), Figures 3-6A and 3-6B (copper), Figures 3-7A
and 3-7B (iron), Figures 3-8A and 3-8B (lead), Figures 3-9A and 3-9B (mercury), Figures 3-10A
and 3-10B (nickel), Figures 3-11A and 3-1 IB (silver), and Figures 3-12A and 3-12B (zinc).
Results from the surface grab samples (0-0.5 ft interval) are shown on the aerial photo and
results from the sonic core depth intervals are shown on the associated graphs.
Figure 3-3A shows the distribution of arsenic SQG exceedances (TEC is 9.79 mg/kg; PEC is
33 mg/kg) in Areas A and B, and Figure 3-3B shows the distribution of arsenic SQG
exceedances in Areas C and Area D.
In Area A, each of the surface grab samples and each of the core samples had concentrations
below the TEC. No surface or subsurface samples in Area A exceeded the PEC.
In Area B, each of the surface grab samples had an arsenic concentration below the TEC with the
exception of HT16-09, which had a concentration between the TEC and PEC (18.3 mg/kg). This
was the highest surface sample arsenic concentration detected in the Harbortown area. In the
core samples, HT16-12 had a maximum arsenic concentration in at least one depth interval that
was greater than three times the PEC; HT16-11 had a maximum arsenic concentration in at least
one depth interval that was between two and three times the PEC; and the remaining locations'
subsurface samples had maximum arsenic concentrations that were below the PEC. The
maximum subsurface arsenic concentration detected in the Harbortown area was at HT16-12 in
the 1-2 ft depth interval (225 mg/kg).
In Area C, each of the surface grab samples had arsenic concentrations below the TEC. In the
core samples, HT16-19 a maximum arsenic concentration in at least one depth interval that was
between two and three times the PEC, and the remaining locations' subsurface samples had
maximum arsenic concentrations below the PEC.
Arsenic
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Revision: 01
Page 3-11
December 2016
In Area D, the surface and each of the core intervals from HT16-33 had arsenic concentrations
less than the TEC.
Figure 3-4A shows the distribution of cadmium SQG exceedances (TEC is 0.99 mg/kg; PEC is
4.98 mg/kg) in Areas A and B, and Figure 3-4B shows the distribution of cadmium SQG
exceedances in Areas C and Area D.
In Area A, each of the surface grab samples and the majority of the core samples had
concentrations below the TEC (0.99 mg/kg). The maximum cadmium concentration in one core
sample from HT16-02 was between the TEC and PEC (4.98 mg/kg).
In Area B, the surface grab sample from HT16-11 had a cadmium concentration between two
and three times the PEC; two locations had surface sample cadmium concentrations between the
PEC and two times the PEC (HT16-05, and -09); and the remaining locations had surface
cadmium concentrations below the PEC. The highest surface sample cadmium concentration
detected in the Harbortown area was at location HT16-11 (10.6 mg/kg). In the core samples,
HT16-13 had a maximum cadmium concentration in at least one depth interval that was greater
than three times the PEC; HT16-11 had a maximum cadmium concentration in at least one depth
interval that was between two and three times the PEC; and the remaining locations' subsurface
samples had a maximum cadmium concentration in at least one depth interval that was below the
In Area C, 10 surface grab samples had cadmium concentrations between the TEC and PEC
(HT16-15, -17, -20, -21, -22, -25, -26, -28, -32, and HBT15-A) and the remaining 11 locations
had surface grab sample cadmium concentrations below the TEC. In the core samples, seven
locations had a maximum cadmium concentration in at least one depth interval that was greater
than three times the PEC (HT16-16,-18B, -19, -20, -23, -28, and -29); HT16-18C had a
maximum cadmium concentration in at least one depth interval that was between two and three
times the PEC; HT16-30 had a maximum cadmium concentration in at least one depth interval
that was between the PEC and two times the PEC; and the remaining locations' subsurface
samples had maximum chromium concentrations below the PEC. The highest subsurface
cadmium concentration in the Harbortown area was detected in HT16-16 in the 3-5.5 ft interval
(129 mg/kg).
In Area D, the surface sample from HT16-33 had a cadmium concentration less than the TEC.
The maximum cadmium concentration detected in the core intervals was between the TEC and
PEC.
Figure 3-5A shows the distribution of chromium SQG exceedances (TEC is 43.4 mg/kg;
PEC is 111 mg/kg) in Areas A and B, and Figure 3-5B shows the distribution of chromium SQG
exceedances in Areas C and Area D.
Cadmium
PEC.
Chromium
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Revision: 01
Page 3-12
December 2016
In Area A, each of the surface grab samples and each of the core samples had chromium
concentrations below the TEC.
In Area B, two surface grab samples had a chromium concentration between the PEC and two
times the PEC (HT16-05 and -11) and the remaining locations had surface grab sample
chromium concentrations below the PEC. In the core samples, two locations had a maximum
chromium concentration in at least one depth interval that was greater than three times the PEC
(HT16-12 and -13); HT16-11 had a maximum chromium concentration in at least one depth
interval that was between the PEC and two times the PEC; and the remaining seven locations'
subsurface samples had maximum chromium concentrations were below the TEC.
In Area C, HT 16-29 had a surface grab sample concentration between the PEC and two times the
PEC; five locations had concentrations between the TEC and PEC (HT16-20, -21, -22, HBT15-A
and -B); and the remaining locations had surface grab sample chromium concentrations below
the TEC. The highest chromium concentration detected in the surface grab samples in the
Harbortown area was from location HT 16-29 (180 mg/kg). In the core samples, HT 16-28 had a
maximum chromium concentration in at least one depth interval that was greater than three times
the PEC; HT16-19 had a maximum chromium concentration in at least one depth interval that
was between two and three times the PEC; three locations had a maximum chromium
concentration in at least one depth interval that was between the PEC and two times the PEC
(HT16-18B, -16, and -20); and the remaining locations' subsurface samples had maximum
chromium concentrations below the PEC. The highest subsurface chromium concentration in the
Harbortown area was detected in HT16-28 in the 7.5 -9 ft interval (705 mg/kg).
In Area D, the surface sample from HT16-33 had a chromium concentration less than the TEC.
The maximum chromium concentration detected in the core intervals was between the TEC and
PEC.
Figure 3-6A shows the distribution of copper SQG exceedances (TEC is 31.6 mg/kg; PEC is
149 mg/kg) in Areas A and B, and Figure 3-6B shows the distribution of copper SQG
exceedances in Areas C and Area D.
In Area A, each of the surface grab samples and all but one of the core samples had copper
concentrations below the TEC. One subsurface depth interval at location HT16-02 was between
the TEC and PEC.
In Area B, two of the surface grab samples had a copper concentration between two and three
times the PEC (HT 16-06 and -11); two locations had surface sample copper concentrations
between the PEC and two times the PEC (HT 16-05 and -09); and the remaining locations had
surface copper concentrations below the PEC. The highest surface grab copper concentration in
the Harbortown area was detected at HT16-11 (437 mg/kg). In the core samples, HT16-11 had a
maximum copper concentration in at least one depth interval that was greater than three times the
PEC; three locations had a maximum copper concentration in at least one depth interval that was
Copper
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Revision: 01
Page 3-13
December 2016
between two and three times the PEC (HT16-05, -12, and -13); and the remaining locations'
subsurface samples had a maximum copper concentration in at least one depth interval that was
below the PEC. The highest copper concentration detected in the subsurface samples in the
Harbortown area was at HT16-11 in the 1-1.5 ft interval (508 mg/kg).
In Area C, 14 of the surface grab sample concentrations were between the TEC and PEC
(HT16-15, -17, -19, -20, -21, -22, -23, -25, -26, -27, -28, -30, and HBT15-A and -B) and the
remaining 7 locations had surface grab sample copper concentrations below the TEC. In the core
samples, three locations had a maximum copper concentration in at least one depth interval that
was between the two and three times the PEC (HT16-18B, -19, and -28); HT-16-16 had a
maximum copper concentration in at least one depth interval that was between the PEC and two
times the PEC; and the remaining locations' subsurface samples had maximum copper
concentrations below the PEC. The highest subsurface copper concentration in the Harbortown
area was detected in HT16-28 in the 7.5-9 ft interval (705 mg/kg).
In Area D, the surface sample from HT16-33 had a copper concentration between the TEC and
PEC. The maximum copper concentration detected in the core intervals was between the TEC
Figure 3-7A shows the distribution of iron SQG exceedances (TEC is 20,000 mg/kg; PEC is
40,000 mg/kg) in Areas A and B, and Figure 3-7B shows the distribution of iron SQG
exceedances in Areas C and Area D.
In Area A, with the exception of HT16-01, each of the surface grab samples and subsurface
samples had iron concentrations below the TEC. The surface grab sample at HT 16-01 had an
iron concentration between the TEC and PEC.
In Area B, each of the surface grab samples had iron concentrations below the TEC. In the
cores, two locations each had one subsurface depth interval with an iron concentration between
the TEC and PEC (HT16-12 and -13).
In Area C, the surface grab sample at HT 16-29 had an iron concentration between the PEC and
two times the PEC, and the remaining locations had surface grab sample iron concentrations
below the PEC. The highest detected iron concentration in the surface grab samples in the
Harbortown area was at HT16-29 (49, 300 mg/kg). In the core samples, HT16-27 had a
maximum iron concentration in at least one depth interval that was between the PEC and
two times the PEC, and the remaining locations' subsurface samples had maximum iron
concentrations below the PEC. The highest subsurface iron concentration in the Harbortown
area was detected in HT 16-27 in the 0-1 ft interval (44,900 mg/kg).
In Area D, the surface grab and subsurface samples from HT16-33 had iron concentrations
below the TEC.
and PEC.
Iron
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Revision: 01
Page 3-14
December 2016
Lead
Figure 3-8A shows the distribution of lead SQG exceedances (TEC is 35.8 mg/kg; PEC is
128 mg/kg) in Areas A and B, and Figure 3-8B shows the distribution of lead SQG exceedances
in Areas C and Area D.
In Area A, each of the surface grab samples and all but one core samples had lead concentrations
below the TEC. In the cores, one interval from HT16-02 had a lead concentration between the
TEC and PEC.
In Area B, three surface grab samples had lead concentrations greater than three times the PEC
(HT16-05, -09 and -11); the surface grab sample from HT16-06 had a lead concentration
between two and three times the PEC; the surface grab sample from HT16-14 had a lead
concentration between the PEC and two times the PEC; and the remaining locations had grab
surface sample concentrations that were less than the PEC. The grab surface sample with the
highest detected lead concentration in the Harbortown area was at HT16-11 (1,030 mg/kg). In
the core samples, three locations had a maximum lead concentration in at least one depth interval
that was greater than three times the PEC (HT16-11, -12, and -13); two locations had a
maximum lead concentration in at least one depth interval that was between two and three times
the PEC (HT16-05 and -09); and the remaining locations' subsurface samples had lead
concentrations that were less than the TEC.
In Area C, four surface grab samples had lead concentrations between the PEC and two times the
PEC (HT 16-20, -21, -22, and -25), and the remaining locations had surface grab samples with
lead concentrations that were below the PEC. In the core samples, 12 locations had a maximum
lead concentration in at least one depth interval that was greater than three times the PEC (HT16-
16, -17, -18B, -18C, -19, -20, -23, -27, -28, -29, -30, and HBT15-B); two locations had a
maximum lead concentration in at least one depth interval that was between two and three times
the PEC (HBT15-A and HT16-15); two locations had maximum lead concentrations in at least
one depth interval that was between the PEC and two times the PEC (HT16-25 and HBT15-C);
and the remaining six locations' subsurface samples had maximum lead concentrations below the
TEC. The highest subsurface lead concentration in the Harbortown area was detected in
HT 16-27 in the 1-2 ft interval (3,180 mg/kg).
In Area D, the surface grab sample from HT16-33 had a lead concentration between the TEC and
PEC. The maximum lead concentration in the subsurface samples was between two and three
times the PEC.
Figure 3-9A shows the distribution of mercury SQG exceedances (TEC is 0.18 mg/kg; PEC is
1.06 mg/kg) in Areas A and B, and Figure 3-9B shows the distribution of mercury SQG
exceedances in Areas C and Area D.
Mercury
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Revision: 01
Page 3-15
December 2016
In Area A, two of the surface grab sample concentrations were between the TEC and PEC
(HT16-01 and -02), and the remaining two surface grab sample concentrations were less than the
TEC. HT16-02 was the only location with subsurface sample concentrations between the TEC
and PEC in each depth interval; the remaining three locations' subsurface concentrations were
less than the TEC.
In Area B, the surface grab sample from HT 16-05 had a mercury concentration between two and
three times the PEC; six locations had surface grab samples with mercury concentrations
between the TEC and PEC (HT 16-06, -07, -09, -11,-12, and -14); and the remaining two
locations had grab surface sample concentrations that were less than the TEC. The grab surface
sample with the highest detected mercury concentration in the Harbortown area was at HT 16-05
(2.6 mg/kg). In the core samples, three locations had maximum mercury concentrations in at
least one depth interval that were greater than three times the PEC (HT16-11, -12, and -13);
two locations had maximum mercury concentrations in at least one depth interval that were
between two and three times the PEC (HT 16-05 and -09); and the remaining locations'
subsurface samples had mercury concentrations that were less than the TEC.
In Area C, none of the surface grab samples had mercury concentrations that exceeded the PEC;
13 surface grab samples had concentrations between the TEC and PEC (HT16-17, -19, -20, -
21, -22, -23, -25, -26, -28, -29, -31, -32, and HBT15-A) and the remaining locations had surface
grab samples with concentrations less than the TEC. In the core samples, nine locations had a
maximum mercury concentration in at least one depth interval that was greater than three times
the PEC (HT16-15, -16, -17, -18B, -18C, -19, -20, -28, and HBT15-B); HT16-29 had a
maximum mercury concentration in at least one depth interval that was between two and three
times the PEC; two locations had a maximum mercury concentration in at least one depth
interval that was between the PEC and two times the PEC (HBT15-A and HT16-30); and the
remaining locations' subsurface samples had maximum mercury concentrations below the PEC.
The highest subsurface mercury concentration in the Harbortown area was detected in HT16-15
in the 1-2 ft interval (50.6 mg/kg).
In Area D, the surface grab sample from HT16-33 had a mercury concentration between the TEC
and PEC. The maximum mercury concentration in the subsurface samples was between the PEC
and two times the PEC.
Figure 3-10A shows the distribution of nickel SQG exceedances (TEC is 22.7 mg/kg; PEC is
48.6 mg/kg) in Areas A and B, and Figure 3-10B shows the distribution of nickel SQG
exceedances in Areas C and Area D.
In Area A, HT16-01 had a surface grab sample nickel concentration that was between the TEC
and PEC; the remaining three locations had surface grab samples with nickel concentrations
below the TEC. In the core samples, two locations had a maximum nickel concentration in at
least one depth interval that was between the TEC and PEC (HT 16-01 and -02); the remaining
two locations' subsurface sample concentrations were less than the TEC.
Nickel
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 3-16
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
In Area B, the surface grab sample from HT16-05 had a nickel concentration between the PEC
and two times the PEC; four locations had surface grab samples with nickel concentrations
between the TEC and PEC (HT 16-07, -09, -11, and -12); and the remaining four locations had
grab surface sample concentrations that were less than the TEC. The grab surface sample with
the highest detected nickel concentration in the Harbortown area was at HT 16-05 (75.2 mg/kg).
In the core samples, HT16-13 had a maximum nickel concentration in at least one depth interval
that was greater than three times the PEC; HT16-12 had a maximum nickel concentration in at
least one depth interval that was between the PEC and two times the PEC; six locations had a
maximum nickel concentration that was between the TEC and PEC (HT16-05, -06, -07, -09, -11,
and -14); and the remaining locations' subsurface samples had nickel concentrations that were
less than the TEC. The highest subsurface nickel concentration in the Harbortown area was
detected in the field duplicate for HT16-13 in the 1-2 ft interval (150 mg/kg).
In Area C, 9 surface grab samples had nickel concentrations between the TEC and PEC
(HT16-15, 17, -19, -20, -24, -25, -26, -28, and HBT15-A) and the remaining 12 locations had
concentrations less than the TEC. In the core samples, three locations had a maximum nickel
concentration in at least one depth interval that was between two and three times the PEC
(HT16-18B, -16, -28); four locations had a maximum nickel concentration in at least one depth
interval that was between the PEC and two times the PEC (HT 16-20, -18C, -19, and -29); and
the remaining locations had subsurface samples with nickel concentrations less than the PEC.
In Area D, the surface grab sample from HT16-33 had a nickel concentration below the TEC.
The maximum nickel concentration in the subsurface samples was between the TEC and the
PEC.
Silver
Figure 3-11A shows the distribution of silver SQG exceedances (TEC is 1.6 mg/kg; PEC is
2.2 mg/kg) in Areas A and B, and Figure 3-1 IB shows the distribution of silver SQG
exceedances in Areas C and Area D.
In Area A, two locations had a surface grab sample silver concentration that was between the
TEC and PEC (HT 16-01 and -02); the remaining two locations had surface grab samples with
silver concentrations below the TEC. In the core samples, none of the subsurface samples
exceeded the TEC.
In Area B, none of the surface grab samples exceeded the PEC; with the exception of HT 16-11,
all of the other samples were less than the TEC. In the core samples, three locations had a
maximum silver concentration in at least one depth interval that was between the PEC and
two times the PEC (HT16-11, -12, and -13) and the remaining locations' subsurface samples had
silver concentrations that were less than the PEC.
In Area C, HT16-15 and HT16-17 had grab surface samples with silver concentrations between
the PEC and two times the PEC; the remaining locations had grab surface sample concentrations
below the TEC. The grab surface sample with the highest detected silver concentration in the
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 3-17
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
Harbortown area was at HT16-15 (2.5 mg/kg). In the core samples, HT16-16 had a maximum
silver concentration in at least one depth interval that was greater than three times the PEC; two
locations had a maximum silver concentration in at least one depth interval that was between two
and three times the PEC (HT16-20 and -19); two locations had a maximum silver concentration
in at least one depth interval that was between the PEC and two times the PEC (HT16-18B
and -28); and the remaining locations had subsurface samples with silver concentrations less than
the PEC. The highest subsurface silver concentration in the Harbortown area was detected at
HT16-16 in the 1-3 ft interval (7 mg/kg).
In Area D, the surface grab sample from HT16-33 had a silver concentration between the TEC
and PEC. The maximum silver concentration in the subsurface samples was between the PEC
and two times the PEC.
Zinc
Figure 3-12A shows the distribution of zinc SQG exceedances (TEC is 121 mg/kg; PEC is
459 mg/kg) in Areas A and B, and Figure 3-12B shows the distribution of zinc SQG exceedances
in Areas C and Area D.
In Area A, none of the grab surface samples nor subsurface core samples had zinc concentrations
that exceeded the TEC.
In Area B, the grab surface sample at HT 16-05 had a zinc concentration between two and three
times the PEC and the grab surface sample from HT16-11 had a zinc concentration between the
PEC and two times the PEC. The remaining surface grab samples did not have zinc
concentrations that exceeded the PEC. The highest grab surface sample zinc concentration in the
Harbortown area was in the sample from HT16-05 (1,010 mg/kg). In the core samples, HT16-13
had a maximum zinc concentration in at least one depth interval that was greater than three times
the PEC; two locations had had a maximum zinc concentration in at least one depth interval that
was between two and three times the PEC (HT16-11 and -12) and the remaining locations'
subsurface samples had zinc concentrations that were less than the PEC.
In Area C, none of the grab surface samples had zinc concentrations that exceeded the PEC.
Thirteen locations had concentrations between the TEC and PEC (HT16-15, -17, -19, -20, -21,
-22, -23, -25, -26, -28, -30, -32, and HBT15-A); and the remaining locations had grab surface
samples with zinc concentrations below the TEC. In the core samples, HT16-16 had a maximum
zinc concentration in at least one depth interval that was greater than three times the PEC; two
locations had a maximum zinc concentration in at least one depth interval that was between two
and three times the PEC (HT16-19 and -28); four locations had a maximum zinc concentration in
at least one depth interval that was between the PEC and two times the PEC (HT16-18B, -20, -
17, and -30); and the remaining locations had subsurface samples with zinc concentrations less
than the PEC. The highest subsurface zinc concentration in the Harbortown area was detected at
location HT16-16 in the 3-5.5 ft interval (8,710 mg/kg).
Harbortown Area Site Characterization Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 3-18
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
In Area D, the surface grab sample from HT16-33 had a zinc concentration below the TEC. The
maximum zinc concentration in the subsurface samples was between the TEC and PEC.
3.2.3.7 Ratio of Simultaneously Extracted Metals to Acid Volatile Sulfide
A total of 35 surface grab samples and 4 field duplicates were submitted for the ratio of SEM to
AVS analysis. The SEM/AVS ratio was calculated for samples from 32 of the 39 samples that
were submitted for analysis, but could not be calculated for the remaining 7 samples (HBT15-B
and -C, HT16-08, -18, -24, -30, and -32) because AVS was not detected. Twelve samples had a
SEM/AVS ratio greater than or equal to 1 (HT16-06, -07, -09, -11, -14, -16, -20, -23, -27, -29 -
31, and -32). This indicates that metals may be bioavailable and there is potential for toxicity to
benthic organisms. All SEM/AVS results are presented in Table 3-7. These data were used for
derivation of the ESBTUs presented in Chapter 4.
3.2.3.8 Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Results for DRO and ORO are presented in Table 3-8. The highest concentration of DRO
(C10-C20) was detected in the field duplicate surface grab sample from location HT16-21
(5,700 mg/kg). The highest concentration of ORO (C20-C36) was also detected in the field
duplicate surface grab sample from HT16-21 (5,400 mg/kg).
DRO (C10-C20) and ORO (C20-C36) concentrations were summed (by location) to create a TPH
concentration (TPH [DRO+ORO]) for each location. Figure 3-13 presents the distribution of
TPH (DRO+ORO) results in the Harbortown Area. For the evaluation purposes of this report,
TPH (DRO+ORO) sample results were compared to values of 100, 1,000, 5,000, and 10,000
mg/kg. HT16-21 was the only location with a TPH (DRO+ORO) value greater than 10,000
mg/kg; HT16-05 was the only location with a TPH value between 10,000 and 5,000 mg/kg; 14
locations had TPH values between 1,000 and 5,000 mg/kg (HT16-07, -09, -11, -12, -18, -20, -22,
-23, -28, -31, -32, -30, -33, and HBT15-A); and with the exception of HT16-08, the remaining
locations had TPH values between 100 and 1,000 mg/kg. HT16-08 had a TPH value less than
100 mg/kg.
DRO and ORO Results Compared to Sample-Specific Risk Screening Levels
At present, there are no recognized cleanup goals for petroleum in sediment that are protective of
aquatic receptors. A report prepared for the Massachusetts Department of Environmental
Protection - Office of Research and Standards, titled Sediment Toxicity of Petroleum
Hydrocarbon Fractions (Battelle 2007), proposes an approach for the development of sediment
benchmarks based on the equilibrium partitioning theory. This theory, "states that the toxicity of
hydrocarbons in sediments to benthic organisms is caused by the hydrocarbons that partition
from the organic fraction of sediment particles into pore water and from pore water into the
tissues of sediment-dwelling organisms" (Battelle 2007). Equilibrium partitioning sediment
benchmarks were derived for fractions (classes or groupings of compounds with similar chemical
and toxicological properties) using the final chronic aquatic toxicity value (derived in Battelle
2007 based on a logarithmic relationship between existing toxicological data and known values
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 3-19
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
of the octanol-water partition coefficient), the sediment organic carbon/water partition
coefficient, and the fraction of organic carbon in sediment.
There are uncertainties in using the equilibrium partitioning theory to develop sediment
benchmarks for petroleum, such as the wide range of aromatic hydrocarbon toxicity data for both
marine and freshwater species, as well as various test durations. Additionally, the aqueous
solubility of hydrocarbons used in the DRO and ORO fractions are below the estimated acute
toxicity values; the benchmarks are conservative. Where the benchmarks are exceeded, it is
"difficult to distinguish between toxicological effects and potential physical impacts," and
further site evaluation is necessary (Battelle 2007).
Sediment benchmarks were derived using the following equation:
Sediment Benchmark (mg/kg) = Koc x FCV x foc (0.001)
where:
Koc = sediment organic carbon/water partition coefficient
FCV = final chronic value
foc = fraction of organic carbon in sediment. An foc of 0.1 percent (0.001) was used to
give the most conservative estimated benchmark.
The sediment benchmarks presented in the following table were used to evaluate DRO and ORO
results in the Harbortown Area:
Hydrocarbon
Geometric
Final Chronic
Sediment Benchmark
Fraction
Mean Log Kow
Koc
Value (fig/L)
(mg/kg f„c)
C13 - Cig (DRO)
8.57
1.10 xlO8
0.05^
5543
C19 - C36 (ORO)
11.64
8.32 xlO10
0.0001W
9883
(a) The fraction is not likely toxic because the mean LC50 (lethal concentration required to cause mortality
to 50 percent of test organisms) exceeds mean aqueous solubility.
Source: Table 6, Sediment Toxicity of Petroleum Hydrocarbon Fractions (Battelle 2007).
NOTES:
foc = fraction of organic carbon in sediment.
Koc = sediment organic carbon/water partition coefficient.
Kow = octanol-water partition coefficient.
mg/kg = milligram per kilogram
|ig/L = micrograms per kilogram
DRO = diesel range organics
ORO = oil range organics
Results from the site were provided as DRO C10-C20 and ORO C20-C36. Consequently, for the
purposes of the comparison of site results with sample-specific risk screening values, DRO
C13-C18 and ORO C19-C36 were used, respectively.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
Page 3-20
December 2016
The following equation was used to determine the SSRSLs:
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
SSRSL = Sediment Benchmark (mg/kg) x Fraction of Organic Carbon in Sediment (foc)
This example calculation uses the DRO (C10-C20) results of field duplicate for surface sample
HT16-21 (the maximum detected result for DRO in the Harbortown Area):
HT16-21 - SURF -FD SSRSL = 5543 mg/kg (sediment benchmark) x 0.0225
(foc for HT 16-21-SURF-FD) = 125 mg/kg
Table 3-8, and Figures 3-14A and 3-14B (DRO) and 3-15A and 3-15B (ORO) present the
comparison of results to the calculated DRO and ORO SSRSLs.
Area A
In Area A, all but one location (HT 16-04) had DRO concentrations exceeding the SSRSL.
HT 16-02 had a concentration that was between two and three times the respective SSRSL, and
two locations in Area A had DRO concentrations that were between one and two times the
respective SSRSL (HT16-01 and -03) (Figure 3-14A ).
In Area A, two locations had ORO concentrations that did not exceed the SSRSL (HT 16-03 and
-04) and the remaining two locations had concentrations between one and two times the
respective SSRSL (HT16-01 and -02) (Figure 3-15A).
Area B
Each of the locations in Area B had DRO concentrations that exceeded the respective SSRSL.
Seven locations in Area B had DRO concentrations greater than three times the respective
SSRSL (HT16-05, -06, -07, -09, -11, -13, and -14); HT16-08 had a DRO concentration that was
between two and three times the respective SSRSL; and HT16-12 had a DRO concentration that
was between one and two times the respective SSRSL (Figure 3-14A).
Each of the locations in Area B had ORO concentrations that exceeded the respective SSRSL.
Seven locations in Area B had ORO concentrations greater than three times the respective
SSRSL (HT16-05, -06, -07, -09, -11, -13, and -14); HT16-08 and -12 had ORO concentrations
that were between one and two times the respective SSRSL (Figure 3-15A).
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Revision: 01
Page 3-21
December 2016
Area C
In Area C, all but five locations had DRO concentrations that exceeded the respective SSRSL
(HT16-19, -26, -27, HBT15-A and -C). Two locations had DRO concentrations between two
and three times the respective SSRSL (HT16-28 and -32); four locations had DRO
concentrations between one and two times the respective SSRSL (HT16-15, -17, -25, and
HBT15-B); and the remaining locations had DRO concentrations that were greater than three
times the respective SSRSL (Figure 3-14B).
In Area C, all but four locations had ORO concentrations that exceeded the respective SSRSL
(HT16-19, -25, -26, and -27). Three locations had ORO concentrations between two and three
times the respective SSRSL (HT 16-24, -32, and HBT15-A); three locations had ORO
concentrations between one and two times the respective SSRSL (HT16-15, -17, and -28); and
the remaining locations had ORO concentrations that were greater than three times the respective
SSRSL (Figure 3-15B).
In Area D, the DRO and ORO concentrations were greater than three times the respective SSRSL
at location HT16-33 (Figures 3-14B and 3-15B).
Area D
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 3-22
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
This page intentionally left blank
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 4-1
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
4. EQUILIBRIUM PARTITIONING SEDIMENT BENCHMARKS
PAH ESBTUs were calculated as an additional tool for evaluating potential risk associated with
sediment contamination. ESBTUs are used to estimate whether there is potential ecological risk
associated with exposure to pore water that is in equilibrium with a measured concentration of
the contaminant in the sediment. Thus, ESBTUs are calculated using an assumed relationship
for partitioning between sediment and water.
4.1 POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS
ESBTUs for total 34 PAHs were calculated following the methods outlined in Procedures for the
Derivation o/ESBs for the Protection ofBenthic Organisms: PAH Mixtures (EPA 2003a).
Based on this guidance, individual PAH concentrations in sediment were first divided by the
fraction of organic carbon measured in the sediment sample, resulting in an organic carbon-based
PAH concentration, or normalized concentration:
/- _ cPAHi
^NormalizedPAHi ~ f
Joe
CNormalizedPAHi = normalized individual PAH concentration
CPAHi = individual PAH concentration in sediment
foc = fraction of organic carbon in sediment
This value was then compared to the maximum solubility of that PAH in sediment on an organic
carbon basis (EPA 2003a). To be conservative, the lesser of the two values was used to calculate
the PAH ESBTU This value was then divided by the individual PAH's effective concentration
in sediment, defined as the product of its final chronic value and organic carbon-water partition
coefficient (Koc), resulting in an ESB for each individual PAH.
rrn ^NormalizedPAHi or Kmax
noDpAHi ~ ~
ESBPAHi = ESB for each individual PAH
CNormalizedPAHi = normalized individual PAH concentration
KMax = maximum solubility concentration
CEC = PAH's effective concentration in sediment
(provided in Table 3-4 from EPA 2003c)
The PAH ESBTU for a sediment sample is the sum of the 34 individual PAHs' ESBTUs
(Table 4-1).
Y^ESBTUfcv = I! 34 ESBPAHi
Typically, a PAH ESBTU less than or equal to 1 indicates that benthic organisms are not
expected to be harmed by contamination present in the sediments (EPA 2003a). To better
evaluate the results, the following PAH ESBTUs ranges were used: ESBTUs less than 1,
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Revision: 01
Page 4-2
December 2016
between 1 and 7.5, between 7.5 and 10, and equal to or greater than 10. The samples with PAH
ESBTUs greater than 1 may be toxic to aquatic life. Calculated PAH ESBTU results for each
analyzed sample are provided in Table 4-1. Results from the PAH ESBTU calculations from
Areas A and B are presented in Figure 4-1 A, and results from Areas C and D are presented in
Figure 4-1B.
In Area A, none of the locations that were sampled had a PAH ESBTU greater than 1 in the
surface grab samples. For the core samples, HT16-02 was the only location with at least one
subsurface sample with a PAH ESBTU between 1 and 7.5.
In Area B, all but one of the locations that were sampled had a grab surface sample PAH
ESBTU greater than 1 with the exception of HT16-12. Four locations had PAH ESBTU values
greater than 10 (HT16-06, -07, -11, and -14); HT16-09 had a PAH ESBTU between 7.5 and 10;
and three locations had PAH ESBTU values between 1 and 7.5 (HT16-05, -08, and -13). In the
core samples, all but one location had a subsurface sample PAH ESBTU greater than 1 in at least
one depth interval with the one exception being HT 16-08. At five locations, the maximum PAH
ESBTU value was greater than 10 in at least one subsurface depth interval (HT16-07, -11, -12, -
13 and -14); at two locations, the maximum PAH ESBTU was between 7.5 and 10 in at least one
depth interval (HT 16-05 and -09); and at two locations the maximum PAH ESBTU value was
between 1 and 7.5 in at least one depth interval.
In Area C, four locations had grab surface sample PAH ESBTU values that were greater than 10
(HT16-22, -31, -30, and HBT15-C); seven locations had a grab surface sample PAH ESBTU less
than 1 (HT16-15, -17, -19, -25, -26, -28, and HBT15-A); and the remaining grab surface sample
PAH ESBTUs were between 1 and 7.5. In the core samples eight locations had a the maximum
PAH ESBTU value that was greater than 10 in at least one subsurface depth interval (HT16-18B,
-16, 18C, -17, -19, -23, -29, and -30); at two locations, the maximum PAH ESBTU was between
7.5 and 10 in at least one depth interval (HT 16-20 and -15); at six locations the maximum PAH
ESBTU value was between 1 and 7.5 in at least one depth interval (HT16-21, -27, -28, HBT15-
A, -B, and -C); and at the remaining locations the maximum PAH ESBTU was less than 1 in the
subsurface samples.
In Area D, the grab surface sample PAH ESBTU and the maximum PAH ESBTU detected in the
subsurface core samples were greater than 10.
Area A
Area B
Area C
Area D
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 4-3
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
4.2 METALS
Metal toxicity is evaluated through an indirect estimate of toxicity based on the concentrations of
AVS and SEM, as well as TOC in the sediments. Metal ESBTUs were calculated following the
methods outlined in Procedures for the Derivation of Equilibrium Partitioning Sediment
Benchmarks (ESBs) for the Protection of Benthic Organisms: Metal Mixtures (Cadmium,
Copper, Lead, Nickel, Silver, and Zinc) (EPA 2005). The molar concentration of AVS was
subtracted from the molar concentration of the sum of the SEM measured in each sediment
sample, and the result was divided by the fraction of organic carbon, accounting for preferential
sorption of metals to organic carbon. It should be noted that if the particular sample has excess
AVS such that all SEM is accounted for, this value can be negative.
YSEM - AVS
ESBTUMetais — -
Joe
ESBTUMetais = Metal ESBTU
Y,SEM — AVS = difference between sum of SEM and AVS
foc = fraction of organic carbon in sediment
As presented in the EPA 2005 guidance, when metals ESBTUs are calculated using this method,
a value less than 130 |imol of residual SEM per gram organic carbon (goc) indicates that the
sediment poses a low risk of adverse biological effects associated with metals. Values between
130 and 3,000 |imol/goc may have adverse effects, and values greater than 3,000 |imol/goc are
expected to be associated with adverse effects.
ESBTU results for metals exceeded 130 |imol/g
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 4-4
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
This page intentionally left blank
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Revision: 01
Page 5-1
December 2016
5. PROBABLE EFFECTS CONCENTRATION QUOTIENTS
As described in the Prediction of Sediment Toxicity Using Census-Based Freshwater Sediment
Quality Guidelines (EPA 2000) guidance, PEC-Qs combine data from multiple constituents in
sediments into one unitless index, and thus can be used in comparing the quality of sediments
from different locations and at different times. As discussed in Ingersoll et al. (2001), PEC-Qs
are used to evaluate the combined effects of chemical mixtures on the toxicity of sediments to
benthic organisms. They use consensus-based freshwater SQGs to calculate concentration
quotients (or hazard quotients) defined as measured sediment concentrations divided by the
specific SQG for that particular chemical or metal. The principle of PEC-Qs is to calculate the
geometric mean of all quotients for that particular sediment sample including those for metals,
PAHs, and PCBs.
When the geometric mean PEC-Q is regressed with the percent of toxicity found in that sample
(typically growth or mortality), as shown in Ingersoll et al. (2001), and the geometric mean of
the PEC-Qs is approximately 1, between 30 percent and 50 percent of the organisms showed a
toxic effect. This could be termed the Effect Concentration for 30 percent or 50 percent
respectively. This means that between 70 percent and 50 percent of the organisms should not
show an effect when the PEC-Q is 1. Examination of the proportion of toxicity when the PEC-Q
is 0.5 shows that between 6 percent and 35 percent of the organisms showed a toxic effect, again
meaning that between 94 percent and 65 percent of the organisms did not show a toxic effect
when the PEC-Q was 0.5. The important aspects related to the use of PEC-Qs are:
1. The toxic endpoint is not necessarily lethality, but often the endpoint is a chronic
endpoint such as growth.
2. The use of a PEC-Q of 1 does not imply that 100 percent of organisms exposed to those
concentrations will show an effect (chronic or acute), rather that 30-50 percent of those
organisms will show the effects, and the rest will not be impacted.
3. The proportion of organisms which show an effect drops to 6-35 percent when the
PEC-Q of 0.5 is used.
Consensus-based PECs were used to predict the potential for toxicity in sediments collected from
the Harbortown Area. Mean PEC-Qs were calculated using the procedure that was established
by EPA (2000) to determine the concentration of constituents above which adverse effects are
likely to be observed to sediment-dwelling organisms. A PEC-Q was first determined for each
of seven metals (arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, nickel, and zinc) based on the
available PEC.
PEC — Q metals =
metal concentration (in dry weight)
corresponding PEC value
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 5-2
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
Then, an average PEC-Q for metals was calculated by summing the PEC-Qs of each metal and
dividing by the number of metals that were included in the calculation (EPA 2000).
£ individual metal PEC — Qs
mean PEC — Q metals =
n
where n = number of metals in the calculation with available sediment chemistry data and PECs.
PEC-Qs were also calculated for total 17 PAHs using a value equal to one-half the RL for non-
detects (ND = V2 RL), and total PCBs using a value of zero for the non-detects (ND=0). Nine of
the 17 PAHs have PEC values and were used in the PEC-Q calculation: anthracene,
benzo(a)anthracene, benzo(a)pyrene, chrysene, dibenzo(a,h)anthracene, fluoranthene, fluorene,
naphthalene, phenanthrene, and pyrene.
1
total PAH concentraton (ND = ~RL)(in dry weight)
PEC — Q total PAHs =
PEC — Q total PCBs =
corresponding PEC value
total PCB concentraton (ND = 0)(in dry weight)
corresponding PEC value
A mean PEC-Q was calculated by summing the average PEC-Q for metals, the PEC-Q for
PAHs, and the PEC-Q for PCBs.
mean PEC — Q metals + PEC — Q total PAHs + PEC — Q total PCBs
mean PEC - Q =
n
where n = number of sediment classes of chemicals for which sediment chemistry data are
available.
The mean PEC-Q was determined for each sediment sample to provide an overall measure of
chemical contamination and to support an evaluation of the combined potential effects of
multiple constituents in the sediment collected from the site (EPA 2000).
The mean PEC-Q values for each sample collected are summarized in Table 5-1. The mean
PEC-Qs ranged from 0.04 in the 1-3 ft interval at location HT16-26 to 92.34 in the 0-0.5 ft
interval at location HT16-23 (Table 5-1, Figure 5-1A and Figure 5-2B). The mean PEC-Q for
each sediment sample was compared to benchmarks of 0.5, 1, and 5.
Area A
The mean PEC-Q values in the surface grab samples from Area A were each calculated to be less
than 0.5. In the core samples from Area A, only one sample had a mean PEC-Q greater than 0.5:
HT16-02 in the 1-2 ft interval (0.51).
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Revision: 01
Page 5-3
December 2016
Area B
In the surface grab samples from Area B, the mean PEC-Q value at HT16-11 was greater than 5;
between 1 and 5 at four locations (HT16-05, -06, -07, and -09); between 0.5 and 1 atHT16-14;
and the remaining locations had mean PEC-Q values less than 0.5. In the core samples from
Area B, four of the locations had a maximum PEC-Q value in at least one depth interval that was
greater than 5 (HT16-07, -11, -12, and -13); three locations had a maximum PEC-Q value in at
least one depth interval that was between 1 and 5 (HT16-05, -09, and -14); and the remaining
locations had subsurface samples with PEC-Q values less than 0.5.
In the surface grab samples from Area C, HT16-31 had a mean PEC-Q value greater than 5; six
locations had PEC-Q values between 1 and 5 (HT16-20, -21, -22, -32, -30, and HBT15-C); two
locations had values between 0.5 and 1 (HT16-23 and HBT15-B); and the remaining locations
had values less than 0.5. In the core samples, seven locations had a maximum mean PEC-Q
value in at least one depth interval that was greater than 5 (HT16-18B, -16, -18C, -19, -23, -30,
and HBT15-B); eight locations had a maximum mean PEC-Q value in at least one depth interval
that was between 1 and 5 (HT16-20, -15, -17, -27, -28, -29, HBT15-A and -C); HT16-21 had a
maximum PEC-Q value in at least one depth interval that was between 0.5 and 1; and the
remaining locations had subsurface samples with mean PEC-Q values that were less than 0.5.
In Area D, the surface sample from HT16-33 had a mean PEC-Q value between 1 and 5, and in
the subsurface samples the maximum mean PEC-Q value was greater than 5 in one depth
interval.
Area C
Area D
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 5-4
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
This page intentionally left blank
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 6-1
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
6. SPATIAL ANALYSIS TO DETERMINE HOT SPOTS WITHIN THE
HARBORTOWN AREA
To determine the location of hot spots within the Harbortown Area of the Detroit River AOC,
three datasets were spatially interpolated to develop an estimate of the level and distribution of
elevated concentrations of constituents across the study area: (1) all individual constituents
(Section 3.2.3) with concentrations exceeding their respective PEC in sediment samples; (2) the
calculated PAH ESBTUs (Section 4.1); and (3) the calculated PEC-Qs (Chapter 5). Metals
ESBTU results (Section 4.2) are referenced but were not included as inputs for spatial analysis.
This methodology is consistent with previous projects and facilitate direct comparison between
studies (Section 6.6). Hot spot determination allows for prioritizing areas to be targeted for
further investigation or remediation.
Interpolation was performed by using a spatially explicit statistical method called kriging, as
described in Section 6.1. Section 6.2 describes the kriging analysis results for concentrations of
all constituents with a PEC, Section 6.3 describes the kriging analysis results for PAH ESBTUs,
and Section 6.4 describes the kriging analysis results for PEC-Qs. Section 6.5 describes the
classification and priority assessment of hot spots based on all kriging results.
6.1 METHODOLOGY
A three-dimensional model of each analyte measured in the sediment samples was constructed
using the statistical interpolation method of kriging with C-Tech's Mining Visualization System
Version 9.89.
Input included each analyte's concentration at every location, and the results were combined to
identify all areas with one or more detections above the respective PEC levels, two times above
the PEC levels, and three times above the PEC levels. To further define the hot spot areas
identified from modeling all constituents, additional inputs included the calculated PAH
ESBTUs and PEC-Qs; these were modeled separately to identify areas with PAH ESBTUs of
between 1 and 7.5, between 7.5 and 10, and equal to or greater than 10, and to identify areas with
PEC-Qs between 0.5 and 1 and equal to or greater than 1. Although ESBTUs were also
calculated for metals, these data were not included in the model inputs for the spatial analysis
because only three results (one of which was an FD) exceeded the thresholds discussed in
Section 4.2, and these results occurred within the hot spots identified in Section 6.2.
6.2 MODEL RESULTS FOR ALL PEC CONSTITUENTS IN THE HARBORTOWN
AREA
Concentrations of all individual constituents were input to the model, and the kriging analysis
identified areas with PEC exceedances of total PCBs, total 17 PAHs, and/or each of the 10
metals that have PECs. One large, continuous hot spot (Harbortown Hot Spot 1) was identified
within the study where one or more analytes were present in concentrations exceeding three
times the PEC, a small area adjacent to Belle Isle was identified within the study area
(Harboortown Hot Spot 2) and data from H16-33 were kriged with data from Riverbend to
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Revision: 01
Page 6-2
December 2016
further confirm the presence of Riverbend Hot Spot 1, which was identified in the Riverbend
SCR (EA2016c).
Figure 6-1 presents the results for all constituents exceeding their respective PECs in Areas A, B,
C, and D. The estimated volume of sediment with elevated concentrations of constituents
exceeding their respective PECs for each hot spot along with the predominant constituent
contributing to the elevated concentrations is provided in the figure. The volume estimates do
not include contingency or overburden; however, they are subject to the uncertainties of the
study design and modeling limitations. Figures 6-2A (Areas A and B) and 6-2B (Area C), and
6-2C (Area D) provide additional details on each Hot Spot along with the predominant
constituent(s) contributing to the elevated concentrations.
• Harbortown Hot Spot 1: The Harbortown Hot Spot 1 spans across Areas B and C and
includes 31 sample locations: 9 of the 10 sample locations in Area B and each of the 22
locations in Area C, including both cores sampled from HT16-18 (Figures 6-1, 6-2A, and
6-2B). The estimated volume of sediment with constituent concentrations exceeding the
PEC is approximately 737,777 cubic yards (cy) (Figure 6-1). Constituents for which
PEC exceedances occurred within Hot Spot 1 include total 17 PAHs, total PCBs, arsenic,
cadmium, chromium, copper, iron, lead, mercury, nickel, silver, and zinc. The
predominant constituent contributing to elevated concentrations above the PEC is total
17 PAHs, which exceeded three times the PEC at the majority of locations in areas B and
C (Figures 6-2A and 6-2B). There were six exceptions to this: 2 locations had
concentrations between one and two times the PEC (HT16-21 and 27); and five locations
within the bounds of the Hot Spot did not have total 17PAH exceedances (HT16-10,
-24, -25, -26, and -32). These exceptions correlate to paired core and ponar samples with
lithology comprised either completely of gray fat clay or with very thin layers of soft
sediment at the surface.
• Harbortown Hot Spot 2: Harbortown Hot Spot 2 (Figures 6-1 and 6-2A) is located in
Area A and includes location HT 16-02. The estimated volume of sediment with
constituent concentrations exceeding the PEC is approximately 501 cy. Total 17PAHs
was the constituent contributing to elevated concentrations above the PEC (Figure 6-2A).
• Riverbend Hot Spot 1 (EA 2016c): The Hot Spot in Area D contains sample locations
HT16-33, RB15-01, -02, and -03 (Figures 6-1 and 6-2C). This Hot Spot was identified
previously in the Riverbend SCR and was further confirmed with data from HT16-33.
The estimated volume of sediment for the modeled results shown with constituent
concentrations exceeding the PEC is approximately 130,566 cy (Figure 6-1).
Constituents for which PEC exceedances occurred within this Hot Spot include total 17
PAHs, total PCBs, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury, nickel, silver, and zinc.
The predominant constituent contributing to elevated concentrations above the PEC is
total 17 PAHs which exceeded three times the PEC at three of the four modeled locations
(Figure 6-2C).
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 6-3
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
6.3 MODEL RESULTS FOR PAH EQUILIBRIUM PARTITIONING SEDIMENT
BENCHMARK TOXIC UNITS FOR THE HARBORTOWN AREA
A kriging analysis was performed to identify areas with PAH ESBTUs equal to or greater than 1
within some of the hot spot areas identified when all constituents with a PEC were kriged
(Section 6.2). Figure 6-3 A presents the results for PAH ESBTUs exceeding 1 overlain with the
portion of Harbortown Hot Spot 1 that is in Area B and Harbortown Hot Spot 2 that is in Area A.
Figures 6-3B and 6-3C present the results for PAH ESBTUs exceeding 1 overlain with the
portion of Harbortown Hot Spot 1 that is in Area C and the Riverbend Hot Spot 1 in Area D,
respectively. Metals ESBTUs greater than 130 |imol/goc are presented on Figures 6-3 A,
6-3B, and 6-3C for reference but were not included in the spatial analysis.
PAH ESBTU values greater than 1 are primarily in the same areas as the three hot spots that had
constituents exceeding greater than three times the PEC, identified in Section 6.2.
6.3.1 Spatial Analysis for PAH ESBTUs in Areas A and B
Figure 6-3 A presents areas identified with elevated PAH ESBTUs, maximum PAH ESBTU
values at each sample location, and the overlap of the spatial analysis for PAH ESBTUs with hot
spots identified in Areas A and B using all PEC constituents. The spatial analysis for PAH
ESBTUs in Area A identified one sample location where sediment samples had PAH ESBTU
values greater than 1 (HT16-02). The area identified with elevated PAH ESBTUs is slightly
larger than Harbortown Hot Spot 2, which was identified using all PEC constituents in
Section 6.2.
The spatial analysis for PAH ESBTUs identified one continuous area in which each of the 10
sample locations in Area B had PAH ESBTUs greater than 1. The area identified with elevated
PAH ESBTUs is slightly larger than Harbortown Hot Spot 1, which was identified using all PEC
constituents in Section 6.2. The area of elevated PAH ESBTUs also included location HT16-08,
which was not included in the Harbortown Hot Spot 1. Only three of the 10 locations in Area B
had PAH ESBTU ratios less than 10: HT16-05, -09, and -10.
Areas with elevated PAH ESBTUs in Areas A and B are in the same locations but each have
slightly larger area than the Harbortown Hot Spots 1 and 2, respectively, identified in
Section 6.2.
6.3.2 Spatial Analysis for PAH ESBTUs in Areas C and D
Figure 6-3B presents areas identified with elevated PAH ESBTUs, maximum PAH ESBTU
values at each sample location, and the overlap of the spatial analysis for PAH ESBTUs with hot
spots identified in Area C using all PEC constituents. The spatial analysis for PAH ESBTUs in
Area C identified one continuous hot spot that continued upriver from Area B in which 20 of the
22 sample locations PAH ESBTUs greater than 1. Two locations had PAH ESBTUs that were
less than one (HT16-25 and -26); seven locations had values between 1 and 7.5 (HT16-21, -24,
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 6-4
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
-27, -28, -32, HBT15-A and -B); two locations had PAH ESBTUs between 7.5 and 10
(HT16-15, and -20); and the remaining locations had PAH ESBTUs greater than 10.
Figure 6-3C presents areas identified with elevated PAH ESBTUs, maximum PAH ESBTU
values at each sample location, and the overlap of the spatial analysis for PAH ESBTUs with hot
spots identified in Area D using all PEC constituents. The spatial analysis for PAH ESBTUs in
Area D identified an area of elevated ESBTUs similar to the area of the Riverbend Hot Spot 1,
but with a slightly larger area. Each of the four locations in Area D had PAH ESBTUs greater
than 1; one locations had PAH ESBTUs between 1 and 7.5 (RB15-01) and the remaining three
locations had PAH ESBTUs greater than 10.
6.4 MODEL RESULTS FOR PROBABLE EFFECTS CONCENTRATION
QUOTIENTS FOR THE HARBORTOWN AREA
In addition to all constituent concentrations and PAH ESBTUs, PEC-Qs were also modeled. The
kriging analysis identified areas with PEC-Qs equal to or greater than 0.5 within some of the hot
spot areas that were identified when all constituents were kriged (Section 6.2). Figure 6-4A
presents the results for PEC-Qs exceeding 0.5 overlain with the identified hot spots in Areas A
and B; Figure 6-4B presents the results for PEC-Qs exceeding 0.5 overlain with the identified
hotspots in Area C, and Figure 6-4C presents the results for PEC-Qs exceeding 0.5 overlain with
the identified Hot Spots in Area D.
6.4.1 Spatial Analysis for PEC-Qs in Areas A and B
Figure 6-4A presents areas identified with elevated PEC-Qs, maximum PEC-Q values at each
sample location, and the overlap of the spatial analysis for PEC-Qs with hot spots identified in
Areas A and B using all PEC constituents. The spatial analysis for PEC-Qs in Area A identified
one sample location where sediment samples had PEC-Q values greater than 0.5 (HT16-02).
The area identified with elevated PEC-Qs is slightly larger than Harbortown Hot Spot 2,
identified using all PEC constituents in Section 6.2. The spatial analysis for PEC-Qs in Area B
identified a continuous area in the same area as the previously identified in Section 6.2, where
sediment samples had PEC-Qs greater than 0.5.
6.4.2 Spatial Analysis for PEC-Qs in Areas C and D
The spatial analysis for PEC-Qs in Areas C and D identified two continuous areas where
sediment samples had PEC-Qs greater than 0.5 within the areas of Harbortown Hot Spot 1 and
Riverbend Hot Spot 1, respectively.
Figure 6-4B presents areas identified with elevated PEC-Qs, maximum PEC-Q values at each
sample location, and the overlap of the spatial analysis for PEC-Qs with hot spots identified in
Area C using all PEC constituents. The areas with elevated PEC-Qs in Area C were within the
area of Harbortown Hot Spot 1, identified in Section 6.2 using all PEC constituents. The
majority of samples in Area C had PEC-Q values greater than 0.5; HT16-24, -25, and -26 did not
have elevated PEC-Q values.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 6-5
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
Figure 6-4C presents areas identified with elevated PEC-Qs, maximum PEC-Q values at each
sample location, and the overlap of the spatial analysis for PEC-Qs with hot spots identified in
Area D using all PEC constituents. The areas with elevated PEC-Qs in Area D were in a similar
area to Riverbend Hot Spot 1 (Figure 6-4C). PEC-Qs were greater than 0.5 at each of the four
locations (HT16-33, RB15-01, -02 and -03), creating a continuous area of elevated PEC-Q
values, similar to what was seen in the Hot Spot identified in Section 6.2 using all constituents
with a PEC value.
6.5 CLASSIFICATION OF HOT SPOTS BASED ON ALL KRIGING RESULTS IN
THE HARBORTOWN AREA
The hot spot areas identified in Section 6.2 can be prioritized for further investigation and
potential remediation efforts when considered with the results of the spatial analyses of PAH
ESBTUs and PEC-Qs. Hot spots are further categorized as Level 1, Level 2, or Level 3 based
on the following criteria:
• Level 1 - highest impact
— Contaminant results are > 3 x PEC OR
— PEC-Q > 5, OR
— ESBTU >7.5.
• Level 2
— Contaminant results are > 3 x PEC OR
— PEC-Q > 1, OR
— ESBTU >7.5.
• Level 3 - lowest impact
— Contaminant results are > 3 x PEC OR
— PEC-Q >0.5, OR
— ESBTU > 1.
This categorization is based on the presence of elevated levels of contaminants and is not a
comparative evaluation of the impact of different classes of contaminants. Level 1 hot spot areas
have the largest estimated volumes of sediment with COCs exceeding the PEC. Level 3 hot spot
areas have less elevated contaminant concentrations and, in some cases, smaller estimated
sediment volumes exceeding the PEC. This section presents additional details on each of the
three hot spot areas, presented within their respective levels. Table 6-1 presents maximum PEC
exceedances in any interval for all constituents for sample locations in Harbortown Hot Spot 1;
Table 6-2 presents maximum PEC exceedances in any interval for all constituents for sample
locations in Riverbend Hot Spot 1 and Harbortown Hot Spot 2; Table 6-3 presents maximum
PAH ESBTUs in any interval for sample locations in Harbortown Hot Spot 1; Table 6-4 presents
maximum PAH ESBTUs in any interval for sample locations in Riverbend Hot Spot 1 and
Harbortown Hot Spot 2; Table 6-5 presents maximum PEC-Qs in any interval for sample
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 6-6
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
locations in Harbortown Hot Spot 1; and Table 6-6 presents maximum PEC-Qs in any interval
for sample locations in Riverbend Hot Spot 1 and Harbortown Hot Spot 2.
6.5.1 Level 1 Hot Spots
To be considered Level 1, hot spots must have at least one of the following three conditions: a
contaminant result that is equal to or greater than three times the respective PEC, a PEC-Q value
equal to or greater than 5, or an ESBTU equal to or greater than 7.5. Harbortown Hot Spot 1 and
Riverbend Hot Spot 1 each meet the Level 1 criteria.
6.5.1.1 Harbortown Hot Spot 1
The Harbortown Hot Spot 1 includes 31 sample locations: 9 of the 10 sample locations in Area
B and each of the 22 locations in Area C (Figures 6-2A and 6-2B, Table 6-1). The COCs for this
hot spot area are total 17 PAHs, total PCBs, and 10 metals (arsenic, cadmium, chromium,
copper, iron, lead, mercury, nickel, silver, and zinc).
Total 17 PAHs concentrations exceeded the PEC at 26 of the 31 sample locations in Harbortown
Hot Spot 1. Total 17 PAHs concentrations exceeded three times the PEC at 24 of those 26
locations (Figures 6-2A and B). Of the intervals analyzed, total 17 PAHs concentrations above
the PEC in Hot Spot 1 were present to a maximum depth interval of 10-11 ft (HT16-23). It is
important to note that this sample was observed to have drawdown slough within the core,
indicated by "DS" at the end of the sample ID. Some of the material at the top of this core
section was similar to highly impacted material at the surface of the sample, indicating possible
drawdown during coring. Total PCB concentrations exceeded the PEC at 14 of the 31 sample
locations in Harbortown Hot Spot 1. Concentrations of total PCBs exceeded three times the PEC
at 8 of those 14 sample locations (Figures 6-2A and 6-2B, Table 6-1). Of the intervals analyzed,
total PCB concentrations above the PEC in Hot Spot 1 were present to a maximum depth interval
of 1-2 ft (HT 16-30).
Of the 31 locations in Harbortown Hot Spot 1, arsenic exceeded the PEC at 3 locations
(HT16-11, -12, and -19); cadmium exceeded the PEC at 13 locations (HT16-05, -09, -11, -13,
-16, -18B, -18C, -19, -20, -23, -28, -29, and -30); chromium exceeded the PEC at 10 locations
(HT16-05, -11, -12, -13, -16, -18B, -19, -20 -28, -29,); copper exceeded the PEC at 10 locations
(HT16-05, -06, -09, -13, -12, -11, -18B, -16, -19, and -28); iron exceeded the PEC at 2 locations
(HT16-17 and -29); lead exceeded the PEC at 25 locations (HT16-05, -06, -09, -11, -12, -13,
-14, -15, -16, -17, -18B, -18C, -19, -20, -21, -22, -23, -25, -27, -28, -29, -30, HBT15-A, -B, and
-C); mercury exceeded the PEC at 14 locations (HT16-05, -12, -13, -15, -16, -17, -18B, -18C,
-19, -20, -28, -29, -30, and HBT15-A); nickel exceeded the PEC at 10 locations (HT16-05, -12,
-13,-16, -18B, -18C -19, -20, -28, and -29); silver exceeded the PEC at 7 locations (HT16-11, -
12, -16, -18B, -19, -20, and -28); and zinc exceeded the PEC at 11 locations (HT16-05, -11, -12,
-13, -18B, -16, -19, -28, -30, -20, and -17). No metals exceeded the PEC at 6 locations
(HT16-07, -10, -24, -26, -31, and -32). The highest concentration of total PCBs and iron were
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 6-7
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
detected in surface samples at HT16-11 and HT16-29, respectively. The highest concentrations
of the remaining constituents with PEC values were detected in subsurface samples: total PAHs
HT16-23; arsenic HT16-12; cadmium, silver and zinc HT16-16; chromium and copper HT16-28;
lead HT 16-27; mercury HT16-15; nickel HT16-13 FD;
The majority of sample locations in Harbortown Hot Spot 1 had PAH ESBTUS greater than 10
(Figure 6-3 A and 6-3B, Table 6-3). Exceptions to this were: four locations had PAH ESBTUs
between 7.5 and 10 (HT16-05, -09, -15 and -20); eight locations had PAH ESBTUs between 1
and 7.5 (HT16 -10, -21, -24, -27, -28, -32, HBT15-A, and -B); and two locations had PAH
ESBTUs that did not exceed 1 (HT16-25 and -26). In addition, nine sample locations, each
of which had PAH ESBTUs greater than 10, had metal ESBTUs greater than 130 |imol/goc:
HT16-06, -07, -11, -14, -16, -23, -29, -32, and HBT15-C), which indicates these locations may
have adverse biological effects associated with metals. The majority of samples in Harbortown
Hot Spot 1 had PEC-Q values greater than 0.5; HT- -10, -24, -25, and -26 were the only locations
that did not have PEC-Q values greater than 0.5 (Table 6-5). There were 12 locations that
had constituents greater than three times the PEC and also had PEC-Q values greater than 5:
HT16-07, -11, -12, -13, -16, -18B, -18C, -19, -23, -30, 31, and HBT15-B.
6.5.1.2 Riverbend Hot Spot 1
Riverbend Hot Spot 1 includes sample locations HT16-33, RB15-01, -02, and -03 (Figure 6-2C).
The COCs for this hot spot area are total PCBs, total 17 PAHs, and eight metals (cadmium,
chromium, copper, lead, mercury, nickel, silver, and zinc). The model estimates that most of the
hot spot area has constituent concentrations exceeding three times the PEC.
Concentrations of total 17 PAHs exceeded three times the PEC at three of the four locations and
exceeded the PEC at RBI 5-01; total PCBs exceeded three times the PEC at three of the four
locations but did not exceed the PEC at RB15-03 (Table 6-2). Of the intervals analyzed, total 17
PAH and total PCB concentrations above the PEC in Riverbend Hot Spot 1 were present to a
maximum depth interval of 3-5 ft (RB15-01) (EA 2016c) and 10-11 ft (HT16-23), respectively.
RBI5-01 and -03 had eight metals with concentrations that exceeded respective PECs; RBI5-02
had seven metals with concentrations that exceeded respective PECs; and HT16-33 had three
metals with concentrations that exceeded respective PECs (lead, mercury, and silver). Of the
intervals analyzed, metals concentrations above the PEC in Riverbend Hot Spot 1 were present
to a maximum depth interval of 5-7 ft (detected at location RBI5-03) (EA 2016c).
Three of the four sample locations in Riverbend Hot Spot 1 had maximum PAH ESBTUs that
were greater than 10 (Table 6-4); RB15-01 had a PAH ESBTU between 1 and 7.5 (Table 6-4).
Three of the four sample locations in Riverbend Hot Spot 1 had maximum PEC-Qs greater than
5 with the exception of RB15-03 (Table 6-6), which had a PEC-Q of 4.75 (EA 2016c).
6.5.2 Level 2 Hot Spots
No Level 2 hot spots were identified in this investigation.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 6-8
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
6.5.3 Level 3 Hot Spots
6.5.3.1 Harbortown Hot Spot 2
Harbortown Hot Spot 2 includes HT16-02 (Figure 6-2A). The COCs for this hot spot area are
total 17 PAHs and the PAH ESBTU. Concentrations of total 17 PAHs exceeded the PEC at
HT 16-02 to a depth of 1-2 ft, the PAH ESBTU was greater than 1 (1.83), and the PEC-Q value
was greater than 0.5 (0.51).
6.6 COMPARISON OF HARBORTOWN AREA HOT SPOTS WITH ASSESSMENTS
FOR OTHER SECTIONS OF THE DETROIT RIVER AREA OF CONCERN
The Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 criteria in Section 6.5 were also utilized to categorize hot spots
in the Riverbend Assessment of Contaminated Sediments (EA 2016c) and Mid/Lower Trenton
Channel Assessment of Contaminated Sediments (EA 2015). Different hot spot rating systems
were utilized in the Celeron Island Area Assessment of Contaminated Sediments (EA 2014a) and
the River Rouge/Ecorse Shoreline Assessment of Contaminated Sediments (EA 2014b). In the
Celeron Island Area characterization, hot spots were categorized as low or high impact. Low
impact hot spots were defined as areas having concentrations of at least one constituent
exceeding its respective PEC, while the high impact designation was applied to hot spots
containing concentrations of at least one constituent exceeding three times its respective PEC
(EA 2014a). In the River Rouge/Ecorse Shoreline characterization, hot spots were categorized
as major if the model predicted that a majority of the area within the hot spot had at least one
constituent with a concentration exceeding three times its respective PEC. Hot spots that did not
satisfy the criteria to be labeled as major were identified as other hot spots (EA 2014b).
As discussed in the previous sections, three hots spots have been identified in the Harbortown
Area. Two were designated as Level 1 and the third was designated as Level 3. The two Level 1
Hot Spots would be identified as high impact hot spots under the criteria utilized in the Celeron
Island Area characterization and would be identified as major hot spots according to the criteria
applied in the River Rouge/Ecorse Shoreline characterization. The Level 3 Hot Spot in this
study would be identified as a low impact Hot Spot under the criteria utilized in the Celeron
Island Area characterization and an 'other' Hot Spot based on criteria in the River Rouge/Ecorse
Shoreline study. In the Mid/Lower Trenton Channel, nine hot spots were identified, of which
seven were designated as Level 1, one was designated as Level 2, and one was designated as
Level 3 using the same criteria as the Harbortown designations (EA 2015).
Four hots spots were identified in the Riverbend Area, all of which are designated as Level 1.
All four of the Riverbend Area hot spots would be identified as high impact hot spots under the
criteria utilized in the Celeron Island Area characterization. The four Riverbend Area hot spots
would all be identified as major hot spots according to the criteria applied in the River
Rouge/Ecorse Shoreline characterization.
Of the nine hot spots identified in the Mid/Lower Trenton Channel, seven would be identified as
high impact under the criteria utilized in the Celeron Island Area characterization, with the
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Revision: 01
Page 6-9
December 2016
remaining two being designated as low impact. If the criteria from the River Rouge/Ecorse
Shoreline were applied, four of the Mid/Lower Trenton Channel hot spots would be identified as
major hot spots and the remaining five would be identified as other hot spots.
In the Celeron Island Area characterization, seven hot spots were identified, of which four were
designated as high impact and three were designated as low impact (EA 2014a). If the criteria
described in Section 6.5 were applied to the seven hot spots that were identified in the Celeron
Island Area characterization, four of the hot spots would be identified as Level 1 hot spots and
three would be identified as Level 3 hot spots. If the criteria from the River Rouge/Ecorse
Shoreline characterization were applied, one of the hot spots in the Celeron Island Area would be
identified as a major hot spot and the other six would be considered other hot spots.
Three hot spots were identified in the River Rouge/Ecorse Shoreline characterization, of which
two hot spots were labeled as major and one hot spot was labeled as other (EA 2014b). If the
criteria defined in Section 6.5 were applied to the hot spots identified in the River Rouge/Ecorse
Shoreline characterization, all three of the hot spots would be designated as Level 1. If the
criteria from the Celeron Island Area characterization were applied to the three hot spots
identified in the River Rouge/Ecorse Shoreline characterization, all three would be labeled as
high impact hot spots.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 6-10
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
This page intentionally left blank
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 7-1
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
7. CONCLUSIONS
Based on the data collected during the Harbortown Area sediment characterization, the Level 1
(highest impact) hotspot areas with elevated concentrations of constituents are: Harbortown
Hotspot 1 (includes all of Areas B and C) and Riverbend Hot Spot 1 (includes HT16-33, RB-01,
-02, and -03) (EA 2016c). (Figures 6-2A, 6-2B, and 6-2C). These Level 1 high impact hot spots
have an estimated total of approximately 868,343 cy of sediment with constituent concentrations
exceeding 3 times at least one PEC.
A level 3 (lowest impact) Hot Spot area with elevated concentrations of PAH ESBTUs is
Harbortown Hot Spot 2 (includes one location adjacent to Belle Isle). This Level 3 low impact
Hot Spot has an estimated total of approximately 501 cy of sediment with PAH ESBTUs
exceeding 1.
The three hot spots identified in the Harbortown Area were determined to be Level 1 or 3
hotspots and should be considered for further investigation. Model results indicated that two of
these three areas have (Level 1) a large volume of sediment with elevated concentrations of
constituents exceeding three times respective PECs, elevated PAH ESBTUs and PEC-Qs, as well
as metal ESBTUs greater than 130 |imol/goc. There is a possible correlation of elevated
concentrations being associated with soft sediment; cores that were comprised completely of fat
gray clay had fewer to no exceedances. Further delineation of the extent of sediment with
elevated concentrations of constituents is recommended.
The modeling results for all constituents exceeding two or three times the PEC, the PAH
ESBTUs, and the PEC-Qs suggest that the hot spot areas should be considered for further
investigation and potential remediation within the Harbortown Area. However, it should be
noted that the limited number of samples results in significant uncertainty of the volume of
sediment with elevated concentrations of constituents in the hotspot areas.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 7-2
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
This page intentionally left blank
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 8-1
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
8. REFERENCES
AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Anchor QEA, LLC, and ENVIRON International
Corporation. 2013. Lower Rouge River - Old Channel: Final FS Report. Prepared for
Honeywell International Inc. August.
Battelle. 2007. Sediment Toxicity of Petroleum Hydrocarbon Fractions. Prepared for
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection - Office of Research and
Standards. September.
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC and its affiliate EA Science and
Technology (E A). 2014a. Assessment of Contaminated Sediments, Celeron Island Area
Site Characterization Report, Detroit River Area of Concern, Grosse He, Michigan. July.
. 2014b. Assessment of Contaminated Sediments, River Rouge/Ecorse Shoreline Site
Characterization Report, Detroit River Area of Concern, Wayne County, Michigan.
August.
. 2015. Assessment of Contaminated Sediments, Mid/Lower Trenton Channel Area Site
Characterization Report, Detroit River Area of Concern, Grosse He, Michigan. July.
. 2016a. Quality Assurance Project Plan, Assessment of Contaminated Sediment,
Riverbend Area Site Characterization, Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan.
January.
. 2016b. Quality Assurance Project Plan, Assessment of Contaminated Sediment,
Harbortown Area Site Characterization, Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit,
Michigan. May.
. 2016c. Assessment of Contaminated Sediment, Riverbend Area Site Characterization,
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan. June.
. 2016d. Data Usability Report, Assessment of Contaminated Sediments, Harbortown
Area Site Characterization, Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan.
September.
Geiger, S. C. 2010. The Determination of Sediment Poly cyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon (PAH)
Bioavailability using Direct Pore Water Analysis by Solid-Phase Microextraction
(SPME). ESTCP Project ER-200709. Prepared for Environmental Security Technology
Certification Program, U.S. Department of Defense. August.
Ingersoll, C.G., D.D. MacDonald, N. Wang, J.L. Crane, L.J. Field, P.S. Haverland, N.E. Kemble,
R.A. Lindskoog, C. Severn, and D.E. Smorong. 2001. Predictions of sediment toxicity
using consensus-based freshwater sediment quality guidelines. Archives of
Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 41:8-21.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 8-2
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
Kenaga, D. and J. Crum. 1987. Sediment PCB Concentrations along the U.S. shoreline of the
upper Detroit River, and sediment and Water PCB concentrations in two City of Detroit
combined sewers with overflows to the Detroit River, July and October 1986 and January
1987. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Surface Water Quality Division
MacDonald D.D., C.G. Ingersoll, and T.A. Berger. 2000. Development and evaluation of
consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Archives of
Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 39:20-31.
MacDonald, D.D. and M. MacFarlane. 1999. (Draft). Criteria for managing contaminated
sediment in British Columbia. British Columbia Ministry of Environment, Lands, and
Parks. Victoria, British Columbia.
Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR). 1991. Detroit River Remedial Action
Plan Stage 1. Surface Water Quality Division, Lansing, Michigan. June.
. 1996. Detroit River Remedial Action Plan Report.
. 2008. The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Biennial Remedial Action
Plan Update for the Detroit River Area of Concern. 02 January.
Persaud, D.R., R. Jaagumagi, and A. Hayton. 1993. Guidelines for the protection and
management of aquatic sediments in Ontario. Standards Development Branch. Ontario
Ministry of Environment and Energy. Toronto, Canada.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2000. Prediction of sediment Toxicity Using
Consensus-Based Freshwater Sediment Quality Guidelines. EPA 905/R-00/007. Great
Lakes Program Office, Chicago, Illinois.
. 2003 a. Procedures for the Derivation of Equilibrium Partitioning Sediment
Benchmarks (ESBs) for the Protection ofBenthic Organisms: PAH Mixtures.
EPA-600-R-02-013. Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC 20460.
. 2003b. EPA Region 5 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Ecological Screening
Levels. August.
. 2005. Procedures for the Derivation of Equilibrium Partitioning Sediment Benchmarks
(ESBs) for the Protection ofBenthic Organisms: Metal Mixtures (Cadmium, Copper,
Lead, Nickel, Silver, and Zinc). EPA-600-R-02-011. Office of Research and
Development, Washington, DC 20460. January.
. 2008. Interim Guidance for Developing Global Positioning System Data Collection
Standard Operating Procedures and Quality Assurance Project Plans. EPA/600/R-
08/020.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Revision: 01
Page 8-3
December 2016
. 2009. Guidance for Labeling Externally Evaluated Laboratory Analytical Data for
Superfund Use. OSWERNo. 9200.1-85. EPA 540-R-08-005. Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Washington, D.C. 13 January.
. 2014a. National Functional Guidelines for Superfund Organic Method Data Review.
EPA-540-R-014-002. Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation.
August.
. 2014b. National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Superfund Data Review.
EPA-540-R-013-001. Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation.
August.
. 2015. Statement of Work Assessment of Contaminated Sediments for the Riverbend
Area Site Characterization in the Detroit River Area of Concern. June.
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR). 2003. Consensus Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for Use and Application. WT 732-2003.
December.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.28
Revision: 01
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 8-4
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology December 2016
This page intentionally left blank
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
Figures
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
VICINITY MAP
nmr
Ste Marie
1 ¦
sou
J SIM
MICHIGAN
Milwaukee grand
Rapids
Lansing
chicag, MaP Extent-
Sahia
oLoik
Iceland
Legend
Harbortown Area
li li Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
e
0 12 3 4
Miles
Map Date: 10/18/2016
Basemap: ESRI 2014
\\lovetona.is\GISdata\Federal\Midwest\Michiqan\GLAES\Harbortown\MXD\SCR\SCR Harbortown Figure 1-1 Project Site Location.rnxd
FIGURE 1-1
Project Site Location
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
ft' HI ft'®' ftsd
f*. #«
r^'^wWv*i *3
wfgil riupBrsi^H - -
f (tr»j •; f |f Ji^irs #p«
j. r !W Shi ^r,'i
S»3II
^Area.D
Area C
Area A
Detroit River
Belle Isle
I
\\lovetona.is\GISdata\Federal\Midwest\Michiqan\GLAES\Harbortown\MXD\SCR\SCR Harbortown Figure 1-2 Harbortown Area.mxd
VICINITY MAP
Sterling
Heights
Farming! on
Hills -
Li,ma Map Extent
' 1 1 11 i" ' I'
.Windsor
La Salle
_ _ % Am hen. four g
Mdr moE - > v/
^ Harrow KingsvS
West land
1 jpon Dearborn"
Heights
Essex
Legend
Ponar Surface Sample and
Core Sample Location
Core Collected Only;
® Adequate Surface Volume
Could Not Be Collected
Sample Collected During the
V Riverbend Field Effort (EA 2016c)
CSOs
A Controlled
A Uncontrolled
A Historical
I I Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
! I Area A, B, C, D
Note: Plotted locations show core collection site.
Ponar surface samples were collected within 10 ft
of these locations.
Areas B, C, and D include sample locations along the
north shore of the Detroit River. Area A includes
sample locations along Belle Isle.
©
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000
Feet
Map Date: 12/9/2016
Basemap: ESRI 2014
FIGURE 1-2
Harbortown Area
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
> -
US Rubber W66
Parke Davis - 5
US Rubber W67
Jos Campau (outfall 012)
Riopelle CSO outfall (018)
Parke Davis W63
Parke Davis W64
Parke Davis W65
I
Orleans CSO outfall (017)
Orleans CSO outfall (016) |
f7^
I f *T i
r
Rivard CSO discharge (019) |
Hastings CSO outfall (020)
]Chene St. (outfall 013) |
iDebois Sewer (outfall 014)1
[Mi Elliot (outfall 009)|
jLeib (outfall 010)1
Adair/Wright (outfall 011)
Helen (outfall 008) j
Belle Isle SIP
Detroit River,'-
\\lovetona.is\GISdata\Federal\Midwest\Michiqan\GLAES\Harbortown\MXD\SCR\SCR Harbortown Figure 1-3 CSOs Industrial Outfalls.mxa
VICINITY MAP
Sterling
Heights
Farming on
^—H,,l5^Soi|hneWr--
• -v n
li- Map Extent-
~i i \
Legend
CSOs
A Controlled
A Uncontrolled
A Historical
Industrial Outfalls
H Inactive
~ Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
j m
vVK.ibnd E »
'"' Dearborn- , ]e>:.u
Heights \
.^Windsor
Taylor ,
—/ fl La Salle
. Esse*
AmheRt'iirg
Harrow Kings vil
NTcilROE " >
1-
©
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000
Feet
Map Date: 9/22/2016
Basemap: ESRI 2014
FIGURE 1-3
CSOs and Industrial Outfalls
in the Harbortown Area
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
QJuaw-gm
Training Center
HT16-12
HT16-09
HT16-08
HT16-11
HT16-06
Detroit River
HT16-03
HT16-02
HT16-01
\\lovetonqis\GISdata\Federal\Midwest\Michiqan\GLAES\Harbortown\MXD\SCR\SCR Harbortown Figure 2-1A Sample Locations Areas A and B.mxd
Legend
$ Core Sample Location
A Ponar Surface Sample
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
[ Area A, B
Note: Labeled locations show core collection site.
Ponar surface samples were collected within 10 ft
of these locations.
Areas B, C, and D include sample locations along the
north shore of the Detroit River. Area A includes
sample locations along Belle Isle.
Q
200
Map Date: 12/9/2016
Basemap: ESRI 2014
400
Feet
600
800
FIGURE 2-1A
Sample Locations - Areas A and B
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
VICINITY MAP
Riverfront
Apartments
fgTeajPl
* ^
,3l
Mb
Map Extents
Area C
Legend
$ Core Sample Location
Sample Collected During the
1 Riverbend Field Effort (EA 2016c)
A Ponar Surface Sample
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
I I Area C, D
Note: Labeled locations show core collection site,
Ponar surface samples were collected within 10 ft
of these locations.
©
200 400 600 800
Feet
Map Date: 10/17/2016
Basemap: ESRI 2014
\\lovetona.is\GISdata\Federal\Midwest\Michiqan\GLAES\Harbortown\MXD\SCR\SCR Harbortown Figure 2-1B Sample Locations Areas C and D.mxd
FIGURE 2-1B
Sample Locations - Areas C and D
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
AREA B
^T
i
CD
CN
i
CD
O
O
00
O
N-
o
CD
O
LO
O
VICINITY MAP
570
£ 560
03
>
~ 550
540
*
i 8
:
i
Map Extent _
Areas A & B
Detroit
©
Dearborn
/
* w*
Mi
t^JjFA
Legend
A Ponar Sample Location
# Core Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored circles on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon Total PCB Aroclor (ND = 0) results.
Total PCB Aroclor Cone. (ND = 0)
>3x PEC (2,028 (jg/kg)
>2x PEC (1,352 |jg/kg) and <3x PEC (2,028 |jg/kg)
>PEC (676 pg/kg) and <2x PEC (1,352 |jg/kg)
>TEC (59.8 |jg/kg) and SPEC (676 pg/kg)
< TEC (59.8 (jg/kg)
Q
AREA A
570
560
ED 550
540
*
250
Map Date: 12/9/2016
Basemap: ESRI 2014
500
Feet
750 1,000
^r
o
CO
o
CN
o
o
i
CD
FIGURE 3-1A
Total PCB Aroclor (ISM)
Concentrations ((jg/kg)
Detected in Areas A and B
Harbortown Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
\\lovetongis\GIS
al\Midwest\Michigan\GLAES\H;
bortown Figure 3-1A PCB
-------
AREAD
570
560
CO
CO
I
CD
i—
x
AREA C
£ 550
cc
>
o
LJJ
540
530
570
560
o
CT>
CM
o
m
00
h-
CD
LO
^r
CO
CM
CO
co
LO
LO
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CD
CD
CD
CD
¦«—
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
CD
i—
m
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
o
CO
05
LL!
540
¥
4
i •
3
it
I
530
AREA C
570
560
lu 550
540
\\l oveto n g is\G I Sdata\Fed e ra l\M i d west\M ic h ig a n\G L A ES\H a rbo
<
i
LO
I—
CO
X
CD
O CD 00
CM t- t-
i ii
CD CD CD
X X
LO
i
CD
S
Map Extents
Area C \
Area D—\ \
n -
s
t> arbor n ^ \ ^
/
/ \ Windsor
/ Melu indole
rl'T /
Lincoln.
"""¦-^Park
A 1 11 LJ Sal3x PEC (2,028 pg/kg)
>2x PEC (1,352 pg/kg) and <3x PEC (2,028 pg/kg)
>PEC (676 pg kg) and <2x PEC (1,352 |jg/kg)
>TEC (59.8 pg/kg) and SPEC (676 pg/kg)
< TEC (59.8 pg/kg)
250
©
500
Feet
750 1,000
Map Date: 10/17/2016
Basemap: ESRI 2014
FIGURE 3-1B
Total PCB Aroclor (ISM)
Concentrations ((jg/kg)
Detected in Areas C and D
Harbortown Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
HT16-23
HT16-22
HT16-21
HT16-30
HT16-29
HT16-19
HT16-17
HT16-18
HBT15-A
HT16-16
HBT15-B
HT16-20
HBT15-C
Detroit River
-------
AREA B
^T
i
CD
CN
i
CD
O
O
00
O
N-
o
CD
O
LO
O
VICINITY MAP
570
£ 560
03
>
~ 550
540
» I
s
:
t
t
AREA A
570
560
ED 550
540
^r
o
CO
o
CN
o
o
i
CD
Map Extent _
Areas A & B
Detroit
©
Dearborn
/
Legend
A Ponar Sample Location
# Core Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored circles on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon Total 17 PAH (ND = 1/2 RL) results.
Total 17 PAHs (ND = Vz RL)
Concentrations
>10x PEC (228,000 pg/kg)
>3x PEC (68,400 |jg/kg) and <10x PEC (228,000 ug/kg)
>2x PEC (45,600 (jg/kg) and <3x PEC (68,400 pg/kg)
>PEC (22,800 pg/kg) and <2x PEC (45,600 |jg/kg)
>TEC (1,610 |jg/kg) and
-------
AREAD
570
560
CO
CO
I
CD
i—
x
AREA C
&
C
¦B 550
CB
>
o
LJJ
540
530
570
560
o
CD
CN
o
m
00
h-
CD
LO
^r
CO
CM
CO
co
LO
LO
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CD
CD
CD
CD
¦*—
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
CD
i—
m
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
o
CO
©
LJJ
f
1
8
"0"
I
§
540
530
t* *
I
AREA C
£-
C
O
'-I—'
03
>
CD
570
560
ljj 550
540
Wl oveto n g is\G I Sdata\Fed e ra l\M i d west\M ic h ig a n\G L A ES\H a rbo
<
i
LO
I—
CO
X
CD
O CD 00
CM t- t-
i ii
CD CD CD
X X
LO
i
CD
Map Extents__
Area C
ArealD/^^
Dktroi
Legend
A Ponar Sample Location
# Core Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored circles on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon Total 17 PAH (ND = 1/2 RL) results.
Total 17 PAHs (ND = Vz RL)
Concentrations
>10x PEC (228,000 pg/kg)
>3x PEC (68,400 pg.'kg) and <10x PEC (228,000 ug/kg)
>2x PEC (45,600 (jg/kg) and <3x PEC (68,400 pg/kg)
>PEC (22,800 pg/kg) and <2x PEC (45,600 (jg/kg)
>TEC (1,610 |jg/kg) and
-------
AREA B
o
'-t—'
03
>
_CD
LU
Legend
A Ponar Sample Location
# Core Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored circles on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon arsenic results.
Arsenic Concentrations
>3x PEC (99 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (66 mg/kg) and <3x PEC (99 mg/kg)
>PEC (33 mg/kg) and <2x PEC (66 mg/kg)
>TEC (9.79 mg/kg) and SPEC (33 mg/kg)
-------
AREAD
570
560
CO
CO
I
CD
i—
x
AREA C
570
560
O
CO
I
CD
H
X
CD
CM
i
CD
i—
x
CM
CO
i
CD
H
X
CO
i
CD
0
1
LO
I—
CO
X
CQ CO N
LO CN ™
r" CD CD
i— i—
x x
CQ
X
CD
CM
i
CD
i—
x
LO
CM
i
CD
i—
x
^r
CM
I
CD
i—
x
CO CM
CN CM
i i
CD CD
i— i—
x x
o
v- O) N CO
CM t- t-
i iii
CD CD CD CD
XXX
VICINITY MAP
LO
i
CD
£ 550
03
>
0)
LU
540
5 550
03
>
©
LU
540
j
i
j 8
h* I
Si
l
530
530
AREA C
570
560
{
lu 550
540
\\l oveto n g is\G I Sdata\Fed e ra l\M i d west\M ic h ig a n\G L A ES\H a rbo
<
i
LO
I—
CQ
X
CQ
O CD 00
CM t- t-
i ii
CD CD CD
i— P h
X XX
/ \ HiAiramck
Map Extents
©
park
Area C \
Area D—A \
^ Detroit
Dearborn
./%r*r^>1
\ Windsor
t'T
/ i
Lincoln F ^
-Park "T
Jul
1 La Sale
nutlrj.-iK
< andoln 1
Biver.i^jV /
Legend
A Ponar Sample Location
# Core Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored circles on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon arsenic results.
Arsenic Concentrations
>3x PEC (99 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (66 mg/kg) and <3x PEC (99 mg/kg)
>PEC (33 mg/kg) and <2x PEC (66 mg/kg)
>TEC (9.79 mg/kg) and SPEC (33 mg/kg)
-------
AREA B
£.
C
o
'-t—'
03
>
_CD
LU
Legend
A Ponar Sample Location
O Core Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored circles on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon cadmium results.
Cadmium Concentrations
>3x PEC (14.94 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (9.96 mg/kg) and <3x PEC (14.94 mg/kg)
>PEC (4.98 mg/kg) and <2x PEC (9.96 mg/kg)
>TEC (0.99 mg/kg) and SPEC (4.98 mg/kg)
-------
VICINITY MAP
AREAD
570
560
CO
CO
I
CD
i—
x
AREA C
&
C
¦B 550
03
>
0)
LU
540
530
570
0
CT>
CM
O
CQ
00
h-
CD
LO
^r
CO
CM
CD
u
00
LO
CO
CM
CO
CO
LO
LO
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
¦*-
¦*—
CD
CD
CD
CD
¦*—
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
CQ
I—
CQ
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
g,
c
o
'¦4—'
03
>
0
LU
AREA C
£-
C
O
'¦4—'
03
>
CD
570
560
T
lu 550
540
\\l oveto n g is\G I Sdata\Fed e ra l\M i d west\M ic h ig a n\G L A ES\H a rbo
<
i
LO
I—
m
x
o
CM
i
CD
i—
x
CQ
CD 00
CD CD
i— h
X X
Hjniir.tm- *
Map Extents
Area C \
Area D—0 \
• s? •
Detroit
Dearborn
f \ Windsor
/ Melu indole
«U / e-*i
—-r\»rk y. JR
v. Lincoln r
" -Park "T
/ -n
1 La Sale
River A'rf) 1
Legend
A Ponar Sample Location
O Core Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored circles on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon cadmium results.
Cadmium Concentrations
>3x PEC (14.94 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (9.96 mg/kg) and <3x PEC (14.94 mg/kg)
>PEC (4.98 mg/kg) and <2x PEC (9.96 mg/kg)
>TEC (0.99 mg/kg) and SPEC (4.98 mg/kg)
-------
Legend
A Ponar Sample Location
# Core Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored circles on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon chromium results.
Chromium Concentrations
>3x PEC (333 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (222 mg/kg) and <3x PEC (333 mg/kg)
>PEC (111 mg/kg) and <2x PEC (222 mg/kg)
>TEC (43.4 mg/kg) and SPEC (111 mg/kg)
-------
AREAD
570
AREA C
o
CD
CM
o
CD
00
h-
CD
LO
^r
CO
CM
CD
o
00
LO
CO
CM
CO
CO
LO
LO
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
¦*-
CD
CD
CD
CD
¦*—
•<—
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
CD
I—
CO
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
i
i * *1
*| s
8 1 •
0 lot
: ; ; - S ~_
* : :: ::: | :
•
H 116=30
' lit^
t-1 1 r r
" »; ' *•
- HT16-29
* I «uBn B-J
B IF
Fffi-,:
HT16-23
—;==
HT16-22
HT16-28
•w» <«
HT16-21
wr*
HT 16-19
-HT16-17I
HT16-25
HT16-32
HT16-31
HT16-24
i IT 16-18
L|HT16-16|
HT16-20I
HBT15-A
HBT15-B
HBT15-C
Detroit River
Legend
A Ponar Sample Location
# Core Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored circles on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon chromium results.
Chromium Concentrations
>3x PEC (333 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (222 mg/kg) and <3x PEC (333 mg/kg)
>PEC (111 mg/kg) and <2x PEC (222 mg/kg)
>TEC (43.4 mg/kg) and SPEC (111 mg/kg)
-------
AREA B
570
560
^r
CO
CN
o
o
00
h-
CD
LO
•<—
¦*—
•*—
•<—
o
o
o
O
O
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
8 S
~ 550
540
i
VICINITY MAP
Legend
A Ponar Sample Location
# Core Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored circles on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon copper results.
Copper Concentrations
>3x PEC (447 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (298 mg/kg) and <3x PEC (447 mg/kg)
>PEC (149 mg/kg) and <2x PEC (298 mg/kg)
>TEC (31.6 mg/kg) and SPEC (149 mg/kg)
-------
AREAD
570
560
CO
CO
I
CD
i—
x
AREA C
£ 550
cc
>
o
LJJ
540
530
570
560
o
CD
CN
o
m
00
h-
CD
LO
^r
CO
CM
CO
co
LO
LO
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
CD
i—
m
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
o
CO
05
LL!
540
4
t
*lt
1
530
AREA C
570
560
lu 550
540
<
i
LO
I—
CO
X
CD
O CD 00
CM t- t-
i ii
CD CD CD
X X
LO
i
CD
Map Extents_
Area C
Area D
Dearborn
Legend
A Ponar Sample Location
O Core Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored circles on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon copper results.
Copper Concentrations
>3x PEC (447 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (298 mg/kg) and <3x PEC (447 mg/kg)
>PEC (149 mg/kg) and <2x PEC (298 mg/kg)
>TEC (31.6 mg/kg) and SPEC (149 mg/kg)
-------
Legend
A Ponar Sample Location
# Core Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored circles on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon iron results.
Iron Concentrations
>3x PEC (120,000 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (80,000 mg/kg)
and <3x PEC (120,000 mg/kg)
>PEC (40,000 mg/kg) and <2x PEC (80,000 mg/kg)
>TEC (20,000 mg/kg) and
-------
CO
CO
AREAD
570
560
£ 550
CB
>
O
LJJ
540
:
530
AREA C £
570
0
CD
CM
O
m
00
h-
CD
LO
^r
CO
CM
CD
O
00
LO
CO
CM
CO
CO
LO
LO
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
¦*-
CD
CD
CD
CD
¦*—
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
1—
1—
1—
1—
1—
CD
1—
m
1—
1—
1—
1—
1—
1—
1—
1—
1—
1—
1—
1—
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
VICINITY MAP
03
>
0
LJJ
AREA C
570
560
lu 550
540
5
\\l oveto n g is\G I Sdata\Fed e ra l\M i d west\M ic h ig a n\G L A ES\H a rbo
<
i
LO
I—
CO
X
CD
O CD 00
CM t- t-
i ii
CD CD CD
X X
Map Extents
Area C \
Area D—0 \
• s? •
Dearborn
V
f \ Windsor
/ Melu indole
aU / e-*i
Lincoln r
" -Park "T
W
/ -n
1 La Sale
River.) T-fJ 1
Legend
A Ponar Sample Location
# Core Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored circles on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon iron results.
Iron Concentrations
>3x PEC (120,000 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (80,000 mg/kg)
and <3x PEC (120,000 mg/kg)
>PEC (40,000 mg/kg) and <2x PEC (80,000 mg/kg)
>TEC (20,000 mg/kg) and
-------
Legend
A Ponar Sample Location
# Core Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored circles on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon lead results.
Lead Concentrations
>3x PEC (384 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (256 mg/kg) and <3x PEC (384 mg/kg)
>PEC (128 mg/kg) and <2x PEC (256 mg/kg)
>TEC (35.8 mg/kg) and SPEC (128 mg/kg)
-------
AREAD
570
CO
CO
AREA C
570
o
CD
CM
T_
o
CO
00
h-
CD
LO
^r
CO
CM
CD
u
00
LO
CO
CM
CO
CO
LO
LO
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
¦*—
CD
CD
CD
CD
¦*—
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
CD
I—
CO
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
VICINITY MAP
D earborn
Windsor
Md-indole
Lincoln
-Pack
530
HT16-33
HT16-23
HT16-22
;=
HT16-28
HT16-21
H I I €5=30
H! 16-29
HT 6-1
wJ
~ W¥T
HT16-32
— HT16-31
HT 6-17
HT16-24
I IT 16-18
L|HT16-16|
HT16-20I
HBT15-A
HBT15-B
HBT15-C
Detroit River
Legend
A Ponar Sample Location
# Core Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored circles on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon lead results.
Lead Concentrations
>3x PEC (384 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (256 mg/kg) and <3x PEC (384 mg/kg)
>PEC (128 mg/kg) and <2x PEC (256 mg/kg)
>TEC (35.8 mg/kg) and SPEC (128 mg/kg)
-------
AREA B
£.
C
o
'-t—'
03
>
_CD
LU
Legend
A Ponar Sample Location
O Core Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored circles on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon mercury results.
Mercury Concentrations
>3x PEC (3.18 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (2.12 mg/'kg) and <3x PEC (3.18 mg/kg)
>PEC (1.06 mg/kg) and <2x PEC (2.12 mg/kg)
>TEC (0.18 mg/kg) and SPEC (1.06 mg/kg)
-------
AREAD
570
560
CO
CO
I
CD
i—
x
AREA C
£ 550
cc
>
o
LJJ
540
570
560
o
CT>
CM
o
m
00
h-
CD
LO
^r
CO
CM
CD
u
00
LO
CO
CM
CO
CO
LO
LO
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
¦*—
CD
CD
CD
CD
¦*—
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
CD
i—
CO
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
•B 550
TO
>
0>
LL!
540
I
8
** I
I
530
530
AREA C
570
560
lu 550
540
<
i
LO
I—
CO
X
CD
O CD 00
CM t- t-
i ii
CD CD CD
X X
:
Map Extents_
Area C
Area D
©
Legend
A Ponar Sample Location
# Core Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored circles on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon mercury results.
Mercury Concentrations
>3x PEC (3.18 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (2.12 mg/'kg) and <3x PEC (3.18 mg/kg)
>PEC (1.06 mg/kg) and <2x PEC (2.12 mg/kg)
>TEC (0.18 mg/kg) and SPEC (1.06 mg/kg)
-------
Legend
A Ponar Sample Location
# Core Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored circles on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon nickel results.
Nickel Concentrations
>3x PEC (145.8 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (97.2 mg/kg) and <3x PEC (145.8 mg/kg)
>PEC (48.6 mg/kg) and <2x PEC (97.2 mg/kg)
>TEC (22.7 mg/kg) and SPEC (48.6 mg/kg)
-------
AREAD
570
Legend
A Ponar Sample Location
# Core Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored circles on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon nickel results.
Nickel Concentrations
>3x PEC (145.8 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (97.2 mg/kg) and <3x PEC (145.8 mg/kg)
>PEC (48.6 mg/kg) and <2x PEC (97.2 mg/kg)
>TEC (22.7 mg/kg) and SPEC (48.6 mg/kg)
1 ~li
JHT16-28
IHT16-261
[HT16-25I
HT 16-24
HBT15-A|
L]hbti5^b]
-| HBT15-C
rUTA £5 ool
HT 16-221
i—IHT16-21
HT 6-19
mm
HT 6-17
HT 16-181
HT 16-161
HT16-20I
Detroit River
-------
AREA B
^T
i
CD
CO
i
CO
O
O
00
o
N-
o
CD
O
LO
O
570
560
~ 550
540
©
Q
*
9
1
w
©
s • : §
• t
i •
•
VICINITY MAP
Legend
A Ponar Sample Location
# Core Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored circles on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon silver results.
Silver Concentrations
>3x PEC (6.6 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (4.4 mg/kg) and <3x PEC (6.6 mg/kg)
>PEC (2.2 mg/kg) and <2x PEC (4.4 mg/kg)
>TEC (1.6 mg/kg) and
-------
AREAD
AREA C
o
CD
CM
T_
o
CQ
00
h-
CD
LO
^r
CO
CM
CD
u
00
LO
CO
CM
CO
CO
LO
LO
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
¦*—
CD
CD
CD
CD
¦*—
•<—
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
CQ
I—
CQ
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Legend
A Ponar Sample Location
# Core Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored circles on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon silver results.
Silver Concentrations
>3x PEC (6.6 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (4.4 mg/kg) and <3x PEC (6.6 mg/kg)
>PEC (2.2 mg/kg) and <2x PEC (4.4 mg/kg)
>TEC (1.6 mg/kg) and
-------
Legend
A Ponar Sample Location
# Core Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored circles on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon zinc results.
Zinc Concentrations
>3x PEC (1,377 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (918 mg/kg) and <3x PEC (1,377 mg/kg)
>PEC (459 mg/kg) and <2x PEC (918 mg/kg)
>TEC (121 mg/kg) and
-------
CO
CO
AREAD
AREA C
570
560
£ 550
CB
>
O
LJJ
540
530
570
560
o
CT>
CM
o
CD
00
h-
CD
LO
^r
CO
CM
CO
CO
LO
LO
CM
CM
CM
CM
CM
CD
CD
CD
CD
¦«—
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
m
I—
m
I—
I—
I—
I—
I—
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
o
CO
©
LJJ
540
J
*
1^
8
I
AREA C
570
560
i
8
lu 550
540
\\l oveto n g is\G I Sdata\Fed e ra l\M i d west\M ic h ig a n\G L A ES\H a rbo
<
i
LO
I—
m
x
CD
O CD 00
CM t- t-
i ii
CD CD CD
X X
LO
i
CD
2
Hamlramck
Map Extents
Area C \
ArealD^^\
n - /
__S •
Dearborn
DeUrOlt
Jt
f \ Windsor
/ Mel« indole
aU / e-*i
Lincoln r
" -Park "T
W
/ -n
1 La Sale
:iuil».j.il« ',vy ando£ }
River.i T-fJ 1
Legend
A Ponar Sample Location
# Core Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored circles on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon zinc results.
Zinc Concentrations
>3x PEC (1,377 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (918 mg/kg) and <3x PEC (1,377 mg/kg)
>PEC (459 mg/kg) and <2x PEC (918 mg/kg)
>TEC (121 mg/kg) and
-------
7
HT16-16
HT16-28
HT16-14
HT16-27
HT16-32
HT16-33
HT16-06
HT16-29
HT16-25
HT16-11
HT16-30
HBT15-C
HT16-23
HBT15-B
HT16-22
HBT15-A
HT16-17
HT16-01
HT16-21
HT16-03
Detroit River
HT16-04
r
\\lovetona.is\GISdata\Federal\Midwest\Michiqan\GLAES\Harbortown\MXD\SCR\SCR Harbortown Figure 3-13 Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons.mxd
VICINITY MAP
e
Sterling
' ; Heights-
Novi
Ll>
Farmirvjton
Hl" ¦ - mhMcl W
Map Extent—i ^
I Alton
i
t: >n i ; JO"-*"
La Salle
Essec
-rnrrT:' T
_• ^ Ambers four g
% Hariow iMii'i •'!
Legend
TPH Concentrations
A Sample Location
A >10,000 mg/kg
A < 10,000 mg/kg
~ s5,000 mg/kg
A < 1,000 mg/kg
A <100 mg/kg
I I Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored symbols on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
©
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000
Feet
Map Date: 9/26/2016
Basemap: ESRI 2014
FIGURE 3-13
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
(IDR0+0R0) (mg/kg)
Detected in Areas A and B
Harbortown Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
HT16-12
' r-
Area
•;iT16-13
HT16-141
HT16-11
116-08
HT16-09I
HT16-07
HT16-05
H116-06
\\lovetona.is\GISdata\Federal\Midwest\Michiqan\GLAES\Harbortown\MXD\SCR\SCR Harbortown Figure 3-14ATPH-DRO Areas A and B.mxd
HT16
03
H I
02
Legend
A Ponar Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
[ Area A, B
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Sample results and SSRSLs are displayed
on Table 3-8.
- SSRSL = Site-specific Risk Screening Level
TPH-DRO Concentrations
> 3x SSRSL mg/kg
> 2x SSRSL mg/kg
> 1x SSRSL mg/kg
Does Not Exceed SSRSL
Q
0 200 400 600 800
Feet
Map Date: 12/9/2016
FIGURE 3-14A
Diesel Range Organics (mg/kg)
Detected in Areas A and B
Harbortown Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
HT16-33
HT16-19
HT16-30
HT16-26
-IhT16-29
HT16-17
HT16-25
HT16-32
HT16-23
HT16-16
HBT15-A
HT 16-24
HT16-27
HBT15-B
HBT15-C
HT16-20
HT16-21
HT 16-22
(MS&BMm
\\lovetonqis\GISdata\Federal\Midwest\Michiqan\GLAES\Harbortown\MXD\SCR\SCR Harbortown Figure 3-14B TPH-DRO Areas C and D.mxd
Legend
A Ponar Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
~ Area C, D
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Sample results and SSRSLs are displayed
on Table 3-8.
- SSRSL = Site-specific Risk Screening Level
TPH-DRO Concentrations
> 3x SSRSL mg/kg
> 2x SSRSL mg/kg
> 1x SSRSL mg/kg
Does Not Exceed SSRSL
©
0 200 400 600 800
Feet
Map Date: 10/17/2016
FIGURE 3-14B
Diesel Range Organics (mg/kg)
Detected in Areas C and D
Harbortown Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
HT16-12
' r-
Area
•;iT16-13
HT16-141
HT16-11
116-08
HT16-09I
HT16-07
HT16-05
H116-06
H I
02
\\lovetona.is\GISdata\Federal\Midwest\Michiqan\GLAES\Harbortown\MXD\SCR\SCR Harbortown Figure 3-15ATPH-ORO Areas A and B.mxd
Legend
A Ponar Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
[ Area A, B
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Sample results and SSRSLs are displayed
on Table 3-8.
- SSRSL = Site-specific Risk Screening Level
TPH-ORO Concentrations
> 3x SSRSL mg/kg
> 2x SSRSL mg/kg
> 1x SSRSL mg/kg
Does Not Exceed SSRSL
Q
0 200 400 600 800
Feet
Map Date: 12/9/2016
FIGURE 3-15A
Oil Range Organics (mg/kg)
Detected in Areas A and B
Harbortown Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
HT16-33
HT16-19
HT16-30
HT16-26
-IhT16-29
HT16-17
HT16-25
HT16-32
HT16-23
HT16-16
HBT15-A
HT 16-24
HT16-27
HBT15-B
HBT15-C
HT16-20
HT16-21
HT 16-22
\\lovetonqis\GISdata\Federal\Midwest\Michiqan\GLAES\Harbortown\MXD\SCR\SCR Harbortown Figure 3-15B TPH-ORO Areas C and D.mxd
(MS&BMm
Legend
A Ponar Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
~ Area C, D
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Sample results and SSRSLs are displayed
on Table 3-8.
- SSRSL = Site-specific Risk Screening Level
TPH-ORO Concentrations
> 3x SSRSL mg/kg
> 2x SSRSL mg/kg
> 1x SSRSL mg/kg
Does Not Exceed SSRSL
©
0 200 400 600 800
Feet
Map Date: 10/17/2016
FIGURE 3-15B
Oil Range Organics (mg/kg)
Detected in Areas C and D
Harbortown Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
Legend
A Ponar Sample Location
# Core Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored circles on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon ESBTU results.
- ESBTUs were calculated using total 34 PAHs.
ESBTUs for PAHs
> 10
> 7.5 and < 10
> 1 and < 7.5
< 1
Q
AREA A
570
560
ED 550
540
250
Map Date: 12/9/2016
Basemap: ESRI 2014
500
Feet
750 1,000
^r
o
CO
o
CN
o
o
i
CD
FIGURE 4-1A
ESBTUs for PAHs in Areas A and B
Harbortown Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
\\lovetongis\GIS
al\Midwest\Michigan\GLAES\H;
iALs-yr
^reas A and B.r
HT16-10
HT16-13
HT16-14
HT16-08
HT16-07
HT16-05
Detroit River
HT16-04
HT16-03
HT16-02
-------
540
<
i
in
o
CM
CD
CD 00
CO
X
X X
\\l oveto n g is\G I Sdata\Fed e ra l\M i d west\M ic h ig a n\G L A ES\H a rbo
VICINITY MAP
Legend
A Ponar Sample Location
# Core Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored circles on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon ESBTU results.
- ESBTUs were calculated using total 34 PAHs.
ESBTUs for PAHs
> 10
> 7.5 and < 10
> 1 and < 7.5
< 1
©
0 250 500 750 1.000
Feet
Map Date: 10/3/2016
Basemap: ESRI 2014
FIGURE 4-1B
ESBTUs for PAHs in Areas C and D
Harbortown Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
HT16-23
HT16-22
HT16-21
HT16-30
HT16-29
HT16-19
HT16-17
HT16-18
HBT15-A
HT16-16
HBT15-B
HT16-20
HBT15-C
Detroit River
-------
HT16-12
HT16-11
\\iovetonqis\tji^aata\i-eaerai\iviiawesT\iviicniqan\ULALb\i-iarPon:own\iviAU\^UK\^OK i-iaroorrown i-iqure 4-za Lam u ivietais Areas a ana b.mxa
Belle sle
*
%
IHT 16-13|
HTI6-I4I
HT16-08
HT16-09
HT16-07
HT 16-05
HT 16-06
HT 1
04
HT16-01
HT1
03
hi l
02
Legend
A Ponar Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
[ Area A, B
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Locations are color coded based
upon ESBTU results.
ESBTU Metals Concentrations
>3,000 jjmol/goe
>130 |jmol/goc and <3,000 [jmol/goc
<130 jjmol/goc
Q
0 200 400 600 800
Feet
Map Date: 12/9/2016
Basemap: ESRI 2014
FIGURE 4-2A
ESBTUs for Metals in Areas A and B
Harbortown Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
HT16-33
HBT15-A
Detroit River
\\lovetonqis\GISdata\Federal\Midwest\Michiqan\GLAES\Harbortown\MXD\SCR\SCR Harbortown Figure 4-2B ESBTU Metals Areas C and D.mxd
HBT15-C
HBT15-B
HT 16-22
r
HT16-211
HT16-19
» ,
HT16-15
| HT16-181
| HT16-161
IHT16-201
Legend
A Ponar Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
~ Area C, D
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Locations are color coded based
upon ESBTU results.
ESBTU Metals Concentrations
>3,000 jjmol/goe
>130 |jmol/goc and <3,000 [jmol/goc
<130 jjmol/goc
©
0 200 400 600 800
Feet
Map Date: 10/17/2016
FIGURE 4-2B
ESBTUs for Metals in Areas C and D
Harbortown Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
AREA B
^r
CO
CN
o
o
00
o
o
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
N-
O
CD
O
LO
O
VICINITY MAP
570
560
03
>
0)
LU
550
t :
:
540
Map Extent _
Areas A & B
Detroit
©
Dearborn
/
Legend
A Ponar Sample Location
# Core Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored circles on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon PEC-Q results.
Mean PEC-Q Value
(mean PEC-Q metals +
PEC-Q Total PAHs +
PEC-Q Total PCBs)/3
> 5
> 1 and < 5
> 0.5 and < 1
< 0.5
Q
AREA A
570
560
:
ED 550
540
250
Map Date: 12/9/2016
Basemap: ESRI 2014
500
Feet
750 1,000
^r
o
CO
o
CN
o
o
i
CD
FIGURE 5-1A
PEC-Qs for Areas A and B
Harbortown Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
\\lovetongis\GIS
al\Midwest\Michigan\GLAES\H;
bortown Figure
HT16-10
HT16-13
HT16-14
HT16-08
HT16-07
HT16-05
Detroit River
HT16-04
HT16-03
HT16-02
-------
HT16-23
HT16-22
HT16-21
HT16-30
HT16-29
HT16-19
HT16-17
HT16-18
HBT15-A
HT16-16
HBT15-B
HT16-20
HBT15-C
Legend
A Ponar Sample Location
O Core Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
Detroit River
- Colored triangles on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored circles on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon PEC-Q results.
Mean PEC-Q Value
(mean PEC-Q metals +
PEC-Q Total PAHs +
PEC-Q Total PCBs)/3
> 5
> 1 arid < 5
> 0.5 and < 1
< 0.5
Q
AREAC
570
560
lu 550
540
250
Map Date: 10/3/2016
Basemap: ESRI 2014
500
Feet
750 1.000
<
I
LO
I—
CO
X
o
CN
CO
CD 00
X X
FIGURE 5-2B
PEC-Qs for Areas C and D
Harbortown Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
3ISdata\Federal\Midwest\Michigan\GLAES\Harbc
-------
HT16-28
HT16-05
HT16-13
HBT15-A
HT16-01
Riverbend Hotspot 1*|
130,566 cu yds
Total 17 PAHs
- RB 15-03
HT16-33
^T^HRB 15-011
RB 15-02
^i# 4
MB
Me fm M
HT16-29[
— EJ jflE
IHT16-261
IHT16-251
IHT16-241
n
| HT 16-191
jHT16-17|
I HT 16-161
IHT16-18C|
! t IT 16-15
I HT 16-091
j HT 16-081
HT16-30
HT16-32
1 Detroit Riverl
HT16-27
HBT15-B
|HBT15-C|
j HT 16-311
HT16-18B
HT16-20
HT 16-21
| HT 16-221
I HT 16-231
j HT 16-101
j HT16-111
HT16-07
|JHJ 16-12 IB HT16-021
IHT16-141
HT 16-03
HT 16-04
Harbortowri Hotspot 1
737,777 cu yds
Total 17 PAHs
Harbortown Hotspot 2
501 cu yds
Total 17 PAHs
\\lovetona.is\GISdata\Federal\Midwest\Michiqan\GLAES\Harbortown\MXD\SCR\SCR Harbortown Figure 6-1 All Constituents Kriqinq Results.mxd
VICINITY MAP
Sterling
w ; Heights,
, LakfSt
I arming!on
HUI W
Livonia Map Extent —
1 • 1-96 V. -
/ Weslland - ,
Banon Dearborn"; \j/^ ¦ ¦¦ i.
.^Windsor
' *L, Taiftor ff\
| 7 J La Salle
Lrtf SIII
ctormor."
Esse*
Amherefcurg
Hartmv K:n i .1
Legend
Ponar Surface Sample and
Core Sample Location
Core Collected Only;
® Adequate Surface Volume
Could Not Be Collected
Sample Collected During the
V Riverbend Field Effort (EA 2016c)
¦I > 3X PEC
¦ >2XPEC
I I 2- PEC
I 1 Hot Spot Boundary All PEC Constituents
2 3X PEC * Riverbend Hot Spot 1 extent
shown in gray. Full Riverbend
Hot Spot 1 and volume presented
in Riverbend SCR (EA 2016c),
Note: Plotted locations show core collection site.
Ponar surface samples were collected within 10 ft
of these locations.
Areas B, C, and D include sample locations along the
north shore of the Detroit River. Area A includes
sample locations along Belle Isle.
©
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000
Feet
Map Date: 12/29/2016
Basemap: ESRI 2015
FIGURE 6-1
Spatial Analysis for All Constituents
Harbortown Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
7"
_
7/
#¦11
T
a
151
HT16-14
Analvte
Result
Total 17 PAHs:
115260
Lead:
231
f" ^ ^3
IV
w
ZQ
m
HTli
ft
jr
HT16-09
Analvte
Result
Total 17 PAHs:
Cadmium:
Copper:
Lead:
14
110090
6.6
166
437
Wjfj
MJ/J
HT16-06
Analvte
Result
Total 17 PAHs:
124630
Copper:
324
Lead:
366
HT16-13
HT16-12
Analvte
Result
Analvte
Result
Total 17 PAHs:
282900
Total 17 PAHs:
1372500
Cadmium:
61.9
Arsenic:
225
Chromium:
262
Chromium:
491
Copper:
394
Copper:
413
Lead:
545
Lead:
1230
Mercury:
2
Mercury:
4.2
Nickel:
119
Nickel:
56.2
Zinc:
1260
Silver:
2.5
Zinc:
1290
- HT16-04
HT16-03
Analyte
Unit
PEC
PECx2
PECxS
Total 17 PAHs ND=1/2RL
ug/kg
22800
45600
68400
Total PCBs ND=0
ug/kg
676
1352
2028
Arsenic
mg/kg
33
66
99
Cadmium
mg/kg
4.98
9.96
14.9
Chromium
mg/kg
111
222
333
Copper
mg/kg
149
298
447
Iron
mg/kg
40000
80000
120000
Lead
mg/kg
128
256
384
Mercury
mg/kg
1.06
2.12
3.18
Nickel
mg/kg
48.6
97.2
146
Silver
mg/kg
2.2
4.4
6.6
Zinc
mg/kg
459
918
1377
HT16-05
Analvte
Result
Total 17 PAHs:
90110
Cadmium:
9.8
Chromium:
125
Copper:
228
Lead:
498
Mercury:
2.6
Nickel:
75.2
Zinc:
1010
Jr.
Sk
¦ ¦>
W Ai
» ft >«.
_
HT16-11
Analvte
Result
Total 17 PAHs:
3235300
Total PCBs:
41350
Arsenic:
83.5
Cadmium:
12.3
Chromium:
154
Copper:
508
Lead:
1030
Silver:
3.6
Zinc:
1060
HT16-07
Analvte
Result
Total 17 PAHs:
2725000
HT16-02
Analvte
Result
Total 17 PAHs:
25400
Harbortowri Hot Spot 2
~
_% v
¦w -
HT16-01
iv
m w m
flfc.
Map Extent _
Areas A & B
Detroit
©
Legend
A Ponar Sample Location
yi Core Sample Location
¦ >3XPEC
! 1 >2XPEC
I I s PEC
It II Hot Spot Boundary All PEC Constituents
200
Q
400
Feet
600
800
Map Date: 12/9/2016
Basemap: ESRI 2014
¦
\\lovetonqis\GISdata\Federal\Midwest\Michiqan\GLAES\Harbortown\MXD\SCR\SCR Harbortown Figure 6-2AAH Constituents Kriqinq Results Areas A and B.mxd
FIGURE 6-2A
Spatial Analysis for All Constituents
in Areas A and B
Harbortown Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
. t
VICINITY MAP
i. ¦ !¦»
IfcfeFg? jr-fcMHttBa
&
|HT16-30
[Analvte
Result
(Total 17 PAHs:
487300
Total PCBs:
2440
Cadmium:
8.1
Lead:
512
Mercury:
1.2
Zinc:
543
r
ii fKS
m
River. i»V/ / J
Legend
A Ponar Sample Location
yi Core Sample Location
¦[ > 3X PEC
| 1 >2XPEC
I I >PEC
I 1 Hot Spot Boundary All PEC Constituents
©
200 400 600 800
Feet
Map Date: 12/9/2016
Basemap: ESRI 2014
FIGURE 6-2B
Spatial Analysis for All Constituents
in Area C
Harbortown Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
Kriqinq Results Area D.mxd
I
RB15-03
[Analyte
Total 17 PAHs:
Icadmium
(Chromium:
iCopper:
Lead:
Mercury:
Nickel:
(silver:
Izinc:
Result
262500
56.3
289
435
11.2
1440
HT16-33
Analyte
Result 1
Total 17 PAHs:
236600 1-
Total PCBs:
4000 1
Lead:
350
Mercury:
1.5
|silver:
2.4 |
RB15-02
Analyte
Total 17 PAHs:
Total PCBs:
Cadmium:
Copper:
Lead:
Mercury:
Nickel:
Silver:
Zinc:
Result
743600
2560
RB15-01
Analyte
Total 17 PAHs:
Total PCBs:
Cadmium:
Chromium:
Copper:
Lead:
Mercury:
Nickel:
Silver:
Zinc:
Result
40690
40690
r
145
165 I
m
tjt|
ly * % j
\ ^
) A
m
Riverbend Hot Spot 1*
? Detroit'Riverl
| Analyte
Unit
PEC
PECx2
PECxS 1
Total 17 PAHs ND=1/2RL
ug/kg
22800
45600
684001
Total PCBs ND=0
ug/kg
676
1352
2028
| Arsenic
mg/kg
33
66
99
|Cadmium
mg/kg
4.98
9.96
14.9
|chromium
mg/kg
111
222
333
|Copper
mg/kg
149
298
447
Iron
mg/kg
40000
80000
120000
Lead
mg/kg
128
256
3841
Mercury
mg/kg
1.06
2.12
3.181
| N icke 1
mg/kg
48.6
97.2
146 (
[silver
mg/kg
2.2
4.4
6.61
|Zinc
mg/kg
459
918
13771
Legend
A Ponar Sample Location
yi Core Sample Location
¦I > 3X PEC
P l >2XPEC
I I 2- PEC
I I Hot Spot Boundary All PEC Constituents
5 3X PEC * Riverbend Hot Spot 1 extent
shown in gray. Full Riverbend
Hot Spot 1 and volume presented
in Riverbend SCR (EA 2016c).
Note:
Results from RBI 5-01, -02, and -03 are shown for
reference. Further details for these samples are
provided in the Riverbend SCR (EA 2016c).
©
200 400 600 800
Feet
Map Date: 12/29/2016
Basemap: ESRI 2015
FIGURE 6-2C
Spatial Analysis for All Constituents
in Area D
Harbortown Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
_ HT16-13
Ratio (0.5- 1 ft): 13.10
_ HT16-09
I Ratio (0 - 0.5 ft): 8.72
HT16-12
Ratio (0.5 - 1 ft): 46.50
HT16-06
Ratio (0 - 0.5 ft): 95.46
Metals ESBTU: 2,879.95 jjmol/g,
HT16-08
Ratio (0 - 0.5 ft): 2.79
HT16-05
Ratio (0.5 - 1 ft): 7.88
HT16-14
: Ratio (0.5-1 ft): 32.10
Metals ESBTU: 332.31 fjmol/gOC|
HT16-04
Ratio (0-0.5 ft): 0.161
HT16-10
Ratio (0 - 1 ft): 6.98 [
IHT16-11
Ratio (1 - 1.5 ft): 137.91
Metals ESBTU: 499.42 jjmol/gOC|
|HT16-03
Ratio (0-0.5 ft): 0.06
Detroit River
HT16-07
Ratio (2.5-4 ft): 260.10
Metals ESBTU: 207.57 (jmol/goc
Harbortown Hot Spot 1
(view 1)
HT16-02
Ratio (0.5-1 ft): 1.83
HIT 16-01
Ratio (1 -3 ft): 0.51
—I Harbortown Hot Spot 2
z
\f4
\\lovetona.is\GISdata\Federal\Midwest\Michiqan\GLAES\Harbortown\MXD\SCR\SCR Harbortown Figure 6-3A ESBTU Kriqinq Results Areas A and B.mxd
Legend
A Ponar Sample Location
yi Core Sample Location
¦ ESBTU > 10
¦ 7.5 < ESBTU < 10
I I 1 < ESBTU < 7.5
It II Hot Spot Boundary All PEC Constituents
Note:
Ratio value shown represents highest
ESBTU PAH result with associated depth (ft).
ESBTUs were calculated using total 34 PAHs.
Metals ESBTUs are noted for reference only and were
not included as inputs for the spatial analysis.
Only values greater than 130 |jmol/g0c are shown.
Q
0 200 400 600 800
Feet
Map Date: 12/9/2016
Basemap: ESRI 2014
FIGURE 6-3A
Spatial Analysis for total PAH ESBTUs
in Areas A and B
Harbortown Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
VICINITY MAP
Map Extent
Area C
Dearborn
/ 1.W..0V
Legend
A Ponar Sample Location
yi Core Sample Location
¦I ESBTU > 10
| I 7.5 < ESBTU < 10
I I 1 < ESBTU < 7.5
I 1 Hot Spot Boundary All PEC Constituents
Note:
Ratio value shown represents highest
ESBTU PAH result with associated depth (ft).
ESBTUs were calculated using total 34 PAHs.
Metals ESBTUs are noted for reference only and were
not included as inputs for the spatial analysis.
Only values greater than 130 |jmol/g„c are shown.
©
0 200 400 600 800
Feet
Map Date: 12/9/2016
Basemap: ESRI 2014
\\lovetonqis\GISdata\Federal\Midwest\Michiqan\GLAES\Harbortown\MXD\SCR\SCR Harbortown Figure 6-3B ESBTU Kriqinq Results Area C.mxd
FIGURE 6-3B
Spatial Analysis for total PAH ESBTUs
in Area C
Harbortown Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
\\lovetonqis\GISdata\Federal\Midwest\Michiqan\GLAES\Harbortown\MXD\SCR\SCR Harbortown Figure 6-3C ESBTU Kriqinq Results Area D.mxd
RB15-03
Ratio (3-5 ft): 10.391
r
r r
f
r p-9
HT16-33
Ratio (0.5-1 ft): 21.12
Metals ESBTU: 496.50 |jmol/g0
15-01
l | Ratio (3-5 ft): 1.93
RB15-02
Ratio (1 - 3 ft): 26.55
Metals ESBTU: 221.76 (jmol/g0
Riverbend Hot Spot 1*
? Detroit'Riverl
hm .
'•lEfig
L*
. A
_
Legend
A Ponar Sample Location
yi Core Sample Location
¦I ESBTU > 10
r l 7.5 < ESBTU < 10
i I 1 < ESBTU < 7.5
I I Hot Spot Boundary All PEC Constituents
ESBTU 5 10 * Riverbend Hot Spot 1 extent
. . . „ shown in gray. Full Riverbend
Hot Spot 1 and volume presented
1 S ESBTU <7.5 in Riverbend SCR (EA 2016c).
Note:
Ratio value shown represents highest
ESBTU PAH result with associated depth (ft).
ESBTUs were calculated using total 34 PAHs.
Metals ESBTUs are noted for reference only and were
not included as inputs for the spatial analysis.
Only values greater than 130 |jmol/g0c are shown.
Results from RBI 5-01, -02, and -03 are shown for
reference. Further details for these samples are
provided in the Riverbend SCR (EA 2016c).
©
0 200 400 600 800
Feet
Map Date: 12/29/2016
Basemap: ESRI 2014
FIGURE 6-3C
Spatial Analysis for total PAH ESBTUs
in Area D
Harbortown Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
HT16-13
Ratio (1 -3 ft): 5.10
HT16-09
Ratio (0-0.5 ft): 2.13
_ HT16-08
Ratio (0-0.5 ft): 0.11
HT16-12
Ratio (0.5- 1 ft): 21.36
HT16-06
Ratio (0 - 0.5 ft): 2.09
HT16-05
Ratio (0 - 0.5 ft): 1.86
Harbortowri Hot Spot 2
\\lovetonqis\GISdata\Federal\Midwest\Michiqan\GLAES\Harbortown\MXD\SCR\SCR Harbortowri Figure 6-4A PECQ Kriqinq Results Areas A and B.mx.d
Detroit River
HT16-04
Ratio (0-0.5 ft): 0.071
HT16-03
Ratio (1 -3 ft): 0.061
HT16-02
Ratio (1 -2 ft): 0.51
HT 16-14
iRatio (0.5-1 ft): 1.74
HT 16-07
Ratio (0.5
1 ft): 39.98
)T16-01
Ratio (0-0.5 ft): 0.131
HT16-11
Ratio (1 - 1.5 ft): 47.981
Harbortowri
Hot
Spot
ew
j HT16-10
Ratio (0 - 1 ft): 0.40
Legend
A Ponar Sample Location
yi Core Sample Location
¦ PECQ >5
! I 1 < PECQ < 5
I I 0.5 < PECQ < 1
It II Hot Spot Boundary All PEC Constituents
Note:
Mean PEC-Q Value = (Mean PEC-Q metals +
PEC-Q Total 17 PAHs + PEC-Q Total PCBs)/3
Ratio value shown represents highest result
associated with depth (ft).
200
Map Date: 12/9/2016
Basemap: ESRI 2014
400
Feet
600
800
FIGURE 6-4A
Spatial Analysis for Mean
PEC-Qs in Areas A and B
Harbortown Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
Map Extent
Area C
D e&rborn
Jlen* .
MeK indole
Allen' /7 i ,wu*l
-PiS , // J
Lincoln -J'
""\_Park
Legend
A Ponar Sample Location
yi Core Sample Location
¦I PECQ >5
I 1 1 < PECQ < 5
I I 0.5 < PECQ < 1
I 1 Hot Spot Boundary All PEC Constituents
Note:
Mean PEC-Q Value = (Mean PEC-Q metals +
PEC-Q Total 17 PAHs + PEC-Q Total PCBs)/3
Ratio value shown represents highest result
associated with depth (ft).
©
0 200 400 600 800
Feet
Map Date: 12/9/2016
Basemap: ESRI 2014
\\lovetonqis\GISdata\Federal\Midwest\Michiqan\GLAES\Harbortown\MXD\SCR\SCR Harbortown Figure 6-4B PECQ Kriqinq Results Area C.mxd
FIGURE 6-4B
Spatial Analysis for Mean PEC-Qs
in Area C
Harbortown Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
HT16-33
Ratio (0.5 - 1 ft): 5.70
RB15-02
Ratio (0-1 ft): 12.58
Riverbend Hot Spot 1
\\lovetonqis\GISdata\Federal\Midwest\Michiqan\GLAES\Harbortown\MXD\SCR\SCR Harbortown Figure 6-4C PECQ Kriqinq Results Area D.mxd
: *-
WW M* v-
1 tHifciiht i T
> J 5 ¦ ill - Si 1
If-j
1^1
RB15-03
Ratio (3-5 ft): 4.751
r
r r
f
r p-9
RB15-01
I Ratio (3-5 ft): 5.971
Legend
A Ponar Sample Location
yi Core Sample Location
¦I PECQ >5
P l 1 s PECQ < 5
I I 0.5 < PECQ < 1
1 I Hot Spot Boundary All PEC Constituents
PECQ 5 5 * Riverbend Hot Spot 1 extent
1
-------
Tables
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.28
TABLE 2-1 HARBORTOWN AREA SITE CHARACTERIZATION CORE SAMPLE COORDINATES AND FIELD NOTES
DETROIT RIVER AREA OF CONCERN, DETROIT, MICHIGAN (OCTOBER 2015 AND JUNE 2016)
1 urn II)
l>;ilc S;ini|>li»l
1 Mill' S;iui|tlril
iIikjiIi
1 Jlliil'l ( iu
1 ;iiiii-i
('iHirdiimli'N1"
(In
I ll-Ill Null's
Y 1 X
Y 1 \
\ M)S.< Siiiii- I'Lim- \lirliiii;in Si mill il S Sun r\ IitI i
HBT15-A00
10/27/15
10:45
306144.9972
13485665.28
306145.8477
13485672.20
7
Encountered refusal at 10 ft. Bottom of core is
hard black clay with fuel odor. PID at bottom of
core was 1.5 ppm.
HBT15-B(b)
10/30/15
10:10
305931.9507
13485652.72
305883.7682
13485643.75
49
Sample location moved —50 ft offshore to avoid
riprap near shore. Three ponar grabs taken to
collect sufficient volume for surface sample.
Three different coring attempts were made at this
location over the course of 2 days. The core kept
for chemical analysis was the second core
collected, overall, and the first core collected on
10/30/2015.
HBT15-C(b)
10/30/15
13:05
305815.6799
13485469.06
305772.7285
13485468.52
43
After consultation with EPA, shifted location —44
ft southeast of the target location due to rocks and
shoreline riprap.
HT16-01
6/15/16
10:00
309207.4140
13494028.58
309746.8810
13494549.48
750
Location moved to avoid pipeline/cable area near
bridge to Belle Isle. EPA approved location shift.
Barge spuds settled approximately 10-15 ft into
sediment.
HT16-02
6/7/16
16:00
308436.9939
13492777.02
308438.3160
13492778.51
2
Barge spuds settled approximately 20 ft into
sediment.
HT16-03
6/8/16
12:15
307487.3644
13491843.02
307495.2350
13491827.32
18
Strong wind making it difficult to maneuver barge.
Barge spuds settled approximately 1 ft into
HT16-04
6/8/16
13:50
306709.0720
13491044.37
306720.3390
13491045.15
11
Strong wind making it difficult to maneuver barge.
Barge spuds settled approximately 4 ft into
sediment.
HT16-05
6/14/16
14:25
310558.2311
13492308.36
310290.1710
13492133.51
320
Location moved to avoid pipeline/cable area near
bridge to Belle Isle. EPA approved location move.
HT 16-06
6/14/16
13:15
310044.1082
13492001.98
310037.6780
13492009.00
10
Barge spuds settled approximately 5-6 ft into
sediment.
HT 16-07
6/14/16
12:30
309641.8890
13491425.82
309634.6700
13491435.20
12
Target location was within 10 ft of the shore.
Actual location offset from target due to size of
barge and position of moonpool through which
cores were collected; moonpool is approximately
20 ft from port and starboard sides. Barge spuds
settled approximately 4-6 ft into sediment.
HT 16-08
6/13/16
16:05
309019.8122
13490707.99
308994.9600
13490710.15
25
Location moved 25 ft south of planned due to
difficulty accessing interior of the coast guard slip.
Barge spuds settled approximately 6 ft into the
sediment.
HT 16-09
6/13/16
15:10
308859.9416
13490580.51
308851.2540
13490582.38
9
Barge spuds settled approximately 6 ft into the
sediment.
HT16-10
6/13/16
14:20
308740.1153
13490314.48
308715.4960
13490356.11
48
Barge spuds settled approximately 1-2 ft. Riprap
and large rocks at the EPA coordinates. Moved
point east to avoid rocks but were able to keep
downstream of the outfall.
HT16-11
6/10/16
14:10
308510.4362
13490197.32
308508.5370
13490201.57
5
Barge spuds settled approximately 15 ft into
sediment.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 3
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.28
TABLE 2-1 HARBORTOWN AREA SITE CHARACTERIZATION CORE SAMPLE COORDINATES AND FIELD NOTES
DETROIT RIVER AREA OF CONCERN, DETROIT, MICHIGAN (OCTOBER 2015 AND JUNE 2016)
1 urn II)
l>;ilc S;ini|>li»l
1 Mill' S;ini|tlril
iIikjiIi
1 Jlliil'l ( nn|-(||||;|li-s
Wlllill ( nnrdlllilli'S
DiNliinu' lr<>iii
1 ;iiiii-i
( nnl'diliilli'N1 "
(I'll
Ill-Ill Nnli-s
Y 1 X
Y 1 \
\ M)S.< SI sill- I'Luii- \lulilii;in Si till h |I S Sim i-\ li-i-l i
HT16-12
6/14/16
9:05
308679.5871
13490018.83
308396.2870
13489929.02
297
Location moved from target due to difficulties
accessing the Harbortown Marina with the barge.
Actual location is inside the marina breakwall, but
closer to the marina mouth. Location shift
approved by EPA over the phone.
HT16-13
6/13/16
13:20
308042.8552
13489452.06
308041.7420
13489459.79
8
Barge spuds settled approximately 4-5 ft into
sediment.
HT16-14
6/13/16
12:45
307762.4373
13489443.05
307785.8870
13489439.29
24
Barge spuds settled 4-5 ft into sediment. Location
is farther offshore than other locations; stronger
current impaired barge operator's ability to fix
barge within 10 ft of planned location.
HT16-15
6/13/16
11:50
307516.3570
13488622.26
307505.9680
13488637.25
18
T arget location was within 10 ft of vertical
seawall. Actual location offset from target due to
size of barge and position of moonpool through
which cores were collected; moonpool is
approximately 20 ft from port and starboard sides.
Barge spuds settled approximately 2-3 ft into
sediment.
HT16-16
6/10/16
12:15
307116.8213
13487889.63
307097.3010
13487894.54
20
Barge spuds settled approximately 8 ft into
sediment. Best recovery was on third attempt;
barge shifted after each attempt to avoid re-
sampling the same hole.
HT16-17
6/13/16
11:10
307119.3140
13487794.95
307096.5300
13487810.32
27
Barge could not maneuver into slip far enough to
reach target location due to submerged pilings and
slip size. EPA consulted and agreed that sample
location was adequate. Barge spuds settled
approximately 10 ft and might have continued to
settle if the operator had not stopped them.
HT16-18B
6/14/16
11:00
307229.9803
13487741.26
307112.0840
13487935.58
227
Target coordinates in QAPP adjusted in field to be
closer to Parke Davis outfall after NAPL was
found at HT16-16. EPA provided the revised
coordinates. Barge spuds settled approximately 10
12 ft into the sediment.
HT16-18C
11:25
307229.9803
13487741.26
307096.7320
13487932.95
233
HT16-19
6/13/16
9:35
307227.5196
13487655.85
307189.6840
13487667.84
40
Location moved south approximately 30 ft due to
shallow water in the slip that prevented the barge
from continuing further north. Barge spuds settled
approximately 5 ft into the sediment.
HT16-20
6/13/16
10:10
307085.8376
13487730.05
307084.0740
13487728.96
2
Barge spuds settled approximately 5 ft into
sediment.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 2 of 3
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.28
TABLE 2-1 HARBORTOWN AREA SITE CHARACTERIZATION CORE SAMPLE COORDINATES AND FIELD NOTES
DETROIT RIVER AREA OF CONCERN, DETROIT, MICHIGAN (OCTOBER 2015 AND JUNE 2016)
1 urn II)
I>;ilc S;ini|>li»l
1 Mill' S;iiii|tlril
iIikjiIi
1 Jlliil'l ( iu
1 ;iii»i'i
( nnl'diliilli'N1 "
(I'll
Ill-Ill Nnli-s
Y 1 X
Y 1 \
\ \l>s.t SI sill- I'Luii- \lulilii;ili Si till h |I S Sim r\ IitI i
HT16-21
6/10/16
11:15
306944.2758
13487606.84
306943.2840
13487617.88
11
Target location was close to shore. Actual
location offset from target due to position and size
of barge, as well as the position of moonpool
through which cores were collected; moonpool is
approximately 20 ft from port and starboard sides.
Barge spuds settled approximately 6 ft into the
sediment.
HT16-22
6/10/16
10:25
306798.0461
13487510.75
306798.6770
13487501.14
10
Barge spuds settled approximately 6 ft into the
sediment.
HT16-23
6/9/16
17:00
306840.8550
13487338.89
306788.5010
13487351.25
54
Location moved due to rocks/riprap on the shore.
Sampled to 20 ft.
HT 16-24
6/9/16
16:10
306318.2716
13486521.11
306299.2780
13486538.88
22
Actual location greater than 10 ft from target due
to difficulty maneuvering barge.
HT 16-25
6/10/16
9:20
306558.2801
13486190.35
306413.6670
13486252.90
158
Sample collected at intersection of middle and
main fairways. Move discussed with EPA the
previous day due to difficulty in fitting barge into
the middle fairway of the marina. Barge spuds
settled approximately 2 ft into sediment.
HT 16-26
6/10/16
8:30
306433.0896
13486019.00
306433.0620
13486010.10
9
Barge spuds settled approximately 2 ft.
HT 16-27
6/9/16
15:00
306029.2375
13485902.94
306013.6970
13485905.84
16
Best recovery was achieved on second attempt;
barge shifted after first attempt to avoid re-
sampling the same hole.
HT 16-28
6/9/16
12:30
306312.4213
13485628.00
306280.2880
13485629.40
32
Location moved approximately 30 ft south of
target due to seawall.
HT 16-29
6/9/16
8:30
305201.6697
13484029.84
305176.5330
13484043.85
29
Target location within riprap toe. Sample was
collected as close to target as possible. Barge
spuds settled approximately 1 ft into the sediment.
HT 16-30
6/8/16
17:45
304988.6485
13483627.56
304991.0130
13483626.40
3
About 60 ft downstream of the Hastings Street
CSO outfall. Barge spuds settled approximately 4-
5 ft into the sediment.
HT16-31
6/9/16
11:20
305727.8660
13485287.10
305710.6970
13485293.26
18
Location moved slightly from target due to
seawall.
HT 16-32
6/9/16
10:00
305525.2753
13484785.70
305493.7410
13484776.04
33
Location moved approximately 30 ft south and
approximately 9 ft east of target location due to
concrete seawall. Barge spuds settled
approximately 15 ft into the sediment.
HT 16-33
6/8/16
16:00
NA
NA
302803.3070
13478275.34
NA
Close to sample location RBI 5-02 (sample
location from Riverbend Site Characterization).
Barge spuds settled approximately 4 ft into the
sediment.
(a) Distance of actual from proposed location calculated using GIS.
(b) Locations HBT15-A, -B, and -C were collected during the Riverbend Area Site Characterization field investigation in October 2015 (EA 2016c).
NOTES:
CSO = Combined sewer overflow. NAPL = Non-aqueous phase liquid.
EPA = U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. PID = Photoionization detector.
ft = Foot (feet). ppm = Parts per million.
ID = Identification. QAPP = Quality Assurance Project Plan.
NA = Location added and determined in the field.
NAD83 = North American Datum of 1983.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 3 of 3
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.28
TABLE 2-2 HARBORTOWN AREA SITE CHARACTERIZATION SURFACE SAMPLE COORDINATES AND DESCRIPTION
DETROIT RIVER AREA OF CONCERN, DETROIT, MICHIGAN (OCTOBER 2015 AND JUNE 2016)
Location II)
Dsile Siiiiiplod
Timo Siiniplod
(locitl)
Aclinil (oorilin;ilcs
SurfjuT Sitmple Description
Y
\
\ A 1)83 Stsile I'liino Michi<>;iii Soulli
(I S Suney I'itI)
HBT15-A(a)
10/27/15
10:45
306145.8477
13485672.20
Gray/brown silt, slight fuel odor.
HBT15-B(a)
10/30/15
10:10
305883.7682
13485643.75
Sand and gravel with lots of mussel shells.
HBT15-C(a)
10/30/15
13:05
305772.7285
13485468.52
Sand and gravel mix, lots of mussel shells, some
woody organic debris and bits of broken glass.
HT16-01
6/15/16
10:00
309742.7950
13494524.03
Gray silt with a light brown film on top. A few
mussel shells and pieces of organic debris. PID
reading is 0.0 ppm.
HT16-02
6/7/16
16:00
308418.8450
13492774.77
One ponar grab. Dark gray, fine sand and silt with
organic material.
HT16-03
6/8/16
12:15
307473.3190
13491793.67
Brown sand/silt mix with some algae (cladaphora)
and a few pieces of gravel.
HT16-04
6/8/16
13:50
306712.6270
13491026.16
Gray/brown sand/silt mix with lots of submerged
aquatic vegetation and some gravel. Collected field
duplicate.
HT16-05
6/14/16
14:25
310277.6540
13492116.39
Black silt/sand mix with some organic woody
debris. Hydrocarbon odor and heavy sheen. PID
reading is 0.4 ppm.
HT16-06
6/14/16
13:15
310029.1310
13491985.50
Three ponar grab attempts consolidated into one
tray. Sand with some mussel shells. PID reading is
0.0 ppm.
HT16-07
6/14/16
12:30
309618.1290
13491421.54
Sand with lots of mussel shells and some submerged
aquatic vegetation. PID reading is 0.0 ppm.
HT16-08
6/13/16
16:05
308984.1870
13490691.27
Gray clay. Ten ponar grab attempts consolidated.
HT16-09
6/13/16
15:10
308845.5570
13490559.29
Gray silt/sand mix with some gravel, a few mussel
shells. Sheen and hydrocarbon odor noted. PID
reading is 0.0 ppm.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 4
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.28
TABLE 2-2 HARBORTOWN AREA SITE CHARACTERIZATION SURFACE SAMPLE COORDINATES AND DESCRIPTION
DETROIT RIVER AREA OF CONCERN, DETROIT, MICHIGAN (OCTOBER 2015 AND JUNE 2016)
Location II)
Dsilc Siiiiiplod
Timo Snniplcil
(locitl)
Aclusil C (torilin;ilcs
Surface Sample Description
Y
X
\ A 1)83 Slnlc Plane Michigan South
(I S Simcy Feel)
HT16-10
6/13/16
NA
308705.5930
13490344.40
No sediment recovered from ponar grab attempts
after five attempts. Only large gravel. No surface
sample collected.
HT16-11
6/10/16
14:10
308493.6870
13490186.52
Broken glass, woody organic debris, mussel shells,
plywood, submerged aquatic vegetation, gravel and
a sand/silt mix. Insufficient sediment collected for
16-ounce grain size/moisture content analysis after
12 ponar grab attempts.
HT16-12
6/14/16
9:05
308370.4900
13489909.16
Gray silt with submerged aquatic vegetation. PID
reading is 0.0 ppm.
HT16-13
6/13/16
13:20
308026.8750
13489442.91
Gray silt with lots of submerged aquatic vegetation
and a small amount of sand. PID reading is 0.0
ppm.
HT16-14
6/13/16
12:45
307765.8260
13489416.94
Brown sand with some gravel and a small amount ol
silt. Five ponar grab attempts consolidated in one
tray.
HT16-15
6/13/16
11:50
307498.2020
13488612.03
Dark gray silt with a small amount of organic debris
PID reading is 0.0 ppm.
HT16-16
6/10/16
12:15
307105.4600
13487874.84
Dark brown sand with gravel, a few mussel shells
and some organic/woody debris. A little bit of silt.
PID reading is 0.0 ppm.
HT16-17
6/13/16
11:10
307114.1390
13487794.44
Dark brown/gray silt with lots of submerged aquatic
vegetation. Collected field duplicate. PID reading
is 0.0 ppm.
HT16-18
6/14/16
11:25
307111.8340
13487913.47
Sand and gravel mix with some brown silt. PID
reading is 0.0 ppm. Five attempts consolidated into
one sample.
HT16-19
6/13/16
9:35
307191.3520
13487655.38
Gray silt with lots of submerged aquatic vegetation.
Collected matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate. PID
reading is 0.0 ppm.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 2 of 4
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.28
TABLE 2-2 HARBORTOWN AREA SITE CHARACTERIZATION SURFACE SAMPLE COORDINATES AND DESCRIPTION
DETROIT RIVER AREA OF CONCERN, DETROIT, MICHIGAN (OCTOBER 2015 AND JUNE 2016)
l.oc;ilion II)
Dsilc Sampled
Timo Sampled
(loc.il)
Acliiiil C (torilin;ilcs
Surfsice Sample Description
Y
X
\ A 1)83 Sliilc Miinc Michi»;in South
(I S Suncy Feel)
HT16-20
6/13/16
10:10
307058.0340
13487740.35
Dark brown sand with some silt and a couple of
mussel shells.
HT16-21
6/10/16
11:15
306935.7490
13487599.73
Dark brown sand with some silt, a few pieces of
gravel and some organic/woody debris. Collected
field duplicate. PID reading is 0.0. ppm
HT16-22
6/10/16
10:25
306799.8240
13487476.89
Dark brown/black sand with some silt, a few mussel
shells, organic/woody debris and one rubber band.
HT16-23
6/9/16
17:00
306788.6350
13487325.22
Mostly black/brown sand with a small amount of
submerged aquatic vegetation and some silt.
HT16-24
6/9/16
16:10
306285.6740
13486509.98
Gray/brown clay with some gravel and sand/silt mix
HT16-25
6/10/16
9:20
306410.4840
13486280.37
Black silt. Field duplicate collected.
HT16-26
6/10/16
8:30
306405.3630
13486018.29
Gray silt with thin brown microbial layer on the top.
Collected matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate.
HT16-27
6/9/16
15:00
306003.4800
13485890.21
Mostly mussel shells with some gravel and silt/sand
mix. Fifteen ponar grab attempts made to get
sample volume.
HT16-28
6/14/16
16:20
306295.8060
13485635.51
Dark silt with light brown microbial layer on the
top.
HT16-29
6/14/16
16:45
305182.9510
13484064.25
Sand and gravel mix with mussel shells. Ten ponar
grab attempts consolidated into one tray.
Insufficient volume collected; material for grain
size/moisture content analysis not collected.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 3 of 4
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.28
TABLE 2-2 HARBORTOWN AREA SITE CHARACTERIZATION SURFACE SAMPLE COORDINATES AND DESCRIPTION
DETROIT RIVER AREA OF CONCERN, DETROIT, MICHIGAN (OCTOBER 2015 AND JUNE 2016)
l.oc;ilion II)
Dsilc Sampled
Timo Sampled
(loc.il)
Acliiiil C (torilin;ilcs
Surfsice Sample Description
Y
X
\ A 1)83 Sliilc Miinc Michi»;in South
(I S Suncy Feel)
HT16-30
6/8/16
17:45
305006.1020
13483628.67
Sand with some silt, gravel and a few mussel shells.
Small amount of submerged aquatic vegetation.
Two ponar grab attempts consolidated into one tray.
HT16-31
6/14/16
17:15
305724.6390
13485289.01
Sand with lots of mussel shells and some organic
woody debris.
HT16-32
6/14/16
17:05
305513.8950
13484774.30
Sand/silt mix with some mussel shells.
HT16-33
6/8/16
16:00
302798.6780
13478255.96
Sand with mussel shells, some gravel and
wood/organic debris. Eight ponar grab attempts
consolidated into one sample. PID reading is 0.0
ppm.
(a) Locations HBT15-A, -B, and -C were collected during the Riverbend Area Site Characterization field investigation in October 2015 (EA 2016a).
NOTES:
ID = Identification.
NA = Not applicable; no surface sample sucessfully collected.
NAD83 = North American Datum of 1983.
PID = Photoionization detector,
ppm = parts per million.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 4 of 4
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.28
TABLE 2-3 HARBORTOWN AREA SITE CHARACTERIZATION CORE DATA
DETROIT RIVER AREA OF CONCERN, DETROIT, MICHIGAN (OCTOBER 2015 AND JUNE 2016)
1.million II)
SiillipU-
l*i-< -inii
D:iU-
I'liiri-N-in^
1 imc
(I.I Kill)
Met iiliun hi
1 )lfk ('
\ \\ I)SS(I'I)
Drplli I n mi
1 KtU ill' Knur
In ScriillK'lll
SuiTikt
\ \\ l)SS (I'l)
Ni'riiiiK'iil
SuiTikt
l:lr\ iiliuii
\ \\ l)SS (I'l)
SlllTiH-r
(I'limir)
Siimpk-
O \>
Srdiiiiriil ( nil-' "
IVnrl rill inn
Di-plli (I'D
Si'ilimeiil
ki'iin 1'I \ (I'D
IVrrriil
Krrm rl \
( iilli-i'liiin Mil In kI
( iilli'i'U'd In
Ul'I'llNllI
O \>
HBT15-A00
10/28/2015
11:00
579.6
15.4
564.2
Y
10.0
10.0
100
Sonic Coring
Y
HBT15-B00
10/30/2015
10:10
579.1
24.1
555.0
Y
10.0
6.0
60
Sonic Coring
Y
HBT15-C00
11/2/2015
15:15
579.4
27.4
552.0
Y
10.0
8.9
89
Sonic Coring
Y
HT16-01
6/15/2016
15:30
580.2
28.0
552.2
Y
10.0
9.4
94
Sonic Coring
N
HT16-02
6/9/2016
16:15
579.8
13.3
566.5
Y
20.0
13.1
66
Sonic Coring
N
HT16-03
6/9/2016
12:15
579.3
12.9
566.4
Y
10.0
10.0
100
Sonic Coring
N
HT 16-04
6/10/2016
9:30
580.3
15.5
564.8
Y
10.0
10.0
100
Sonic Coring
N
HT16-05
6/15/2016
11:20
580.3
29.0
551.3
Y
10.0
9.5
95
Sonic Coring
N
HT 16-06
6/15/2016
16:00
580.3
31.8
548.5
Y
10.0
10.0
100
Sonic Coring
N
HT 16-07
6/15/2016
10:00
580.1
26.0
554.1
Y
10.0
10.0
100
Sonic Coring
N
HT16-08
6/14/2016
9:30
580.1
29.7
550.4
Y
10.0
10.0
100
Sonic Coring
N
HT 16-09
6/14/2016
13:00
580.5
28.0
552.5
Y
10.0
10.0
100
Sonic Coring
N
HT16-10
6/14/2016
9:45
580.2
24.5
555.7
N(c)
10.0
10.0
100
Sonic Coring
N
HT16-11
6/13/2016
10:45
580.5
23.3
557.2
Y
10.0
10.0
100
Sonic Coring
N
HT16-12
6/15/2016
9:30
579.9
17.0
562.9
Y
10.0
7.9
79
Sonic Coring
N
HT16-13
6/14/2016
14:30
580.0
16.0
564.0
Y
10.0
7.0
70
Sonic Coring
N
HT16-14
6/14/2016
11:15
580.2
27.0
553.2
Y
10.0
10.0
100
Sonic Coring
N
HT16-15
6/14/2016
10:30
580.2
23.0
557.2
Y
10.0
9.3
93
Sonic Coring
N
HT16-16
6/12/2016
11:00
580.3
23.0
557.3
Y
10.0
9.0
90
Sonic Coring
N
HT16-17
6/14/2016
15:00
580.1
20.0
560.1
Y
10.0
8.5
85
Sonic Coring
N
HT16-18B
6/15/2016
12:30
580.3
21.0
559.3
Y
10.0
6.3
63
Sonic Coring
N
HT16-18C
6/15/2016
13:00
580.3
23.5
556.8
Y
10.0
6.3
63
Sonic Coring
N
HT16-19
6/14/2016
13:35
580.0
13.0
567.0
Y
10.0
9.8
98
Sonic Coring
N
HT 16-20
6/14/2016
8:40
580.0
16.5
563.5
Y
10.0
7.5
75
Sonic Coring
N
HT 16-21
6/13/2016
12:00
580.2
32.5
547.7
Y
10.0
10.0
100
Sonic Coring
N
HT 16-22
6/13/2016
9:45
580.1
33.0
547.1
Y
10.0
10.0
100
Sonic Coring
N
HT 16-23
6/10/2016
17:00
580.2
31.0
549.2
Y
20.0
20.0
100
Sonic Coring
N
HT 16-24
6/12/2016
12:15
580.1
39.0
541.1
Y
10.0
10.0
100
Sonic Coring
N
HT 16-25
6/13/2016
8:45
580.2
14.5
565.7
Y
10.0
00
00
88
Sonic Coring
N
HT 16-26
6/12/2016
14:00
580.0
17.5
562.5
Y
10.0
10.0
100
Sonic Coring
N
HT 16-27
6/10/2016
13:50
580.3
29.0
551.3
Y
10.0
8.3
83
Sonic Coring
N
HT 16-28
6/12/2016
10:00
580.3
16.5
563.8
Y
10.0
8.7
87
Sonic Coring
Y
HT 16-29
6/13/2016
15:45
580.1
25.5
554.6
Y
10.0
7.0
70
Sonic Coring
N
HT16-30
6/10/2016
10:45
579.8
30.0
549.8
Y
10.0
7.8
78
Sonic Coring
N
HT16-31
6/12/2016
15:15
580.1
36.0
544.1
Y
10.0
10.0
100
Sonic Coring
N
HT 16-32
6/12/2016
14:45
580.1
36.0
544.1
Y
10.0
10.0
100
Sonic Coring
N
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 2
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.28
TABLE 2-3 HARBORTOWN AREA SITE CHARACTERIZATION CORE DATA
DETROIT RIVER AREA OF CONCERN, DETROIT, MICHIGAN (OCTOBER 2015 AND JUNE 2016)
Drplli I n mi
Si'dimi'iil (
iilr'"
1.million II)
SiillipU-
l*i-< -inii
D:iU-
I'liiri-N-in^
1 imc
(I.I Kill)
Met iiliun hi
1 )lfk <>f
H;ii!>c
\ \\ l)SS(l'i)
1 KtU ill' Knur
In ScriillK'lll
SuiTikt
\ \\ l)SS (I'l)
Si'dimi'iil
SuiTikt
l:lr\ iiliuii
\ \\ l)SS (I'l)
SlllTiH-r
(I'limir)
Siimpk-
O \>
IVnrl rill inn
Di plh (I'D
Si'riinu'iil
Kinhrr\ (I'D
IVrrriil
krrm ir\
( iilk'cliiin Mil In id
( iilli'i'U'd In
Url'lloiil
(^ N)
HT16-33
6/10/2016
8:45
580.1
33.5
546.6
Y
10.0
8.8
88
Sonic Coring
N
Note: All samples collected by Cascade Drilling.
(a) Where multiple coring attempts were made, core specifications are listed for the core with the highest recovery, which was the core that was processed.
(b) Locations HBT15-A, -B, and -C were collected during the Riverbend Area Site Characterization field investigation in October 2015 (EA 2016c).
(c) Surface sample was abandoned after 5 ponar attempts without any usable sample material.
NOTES:
ft = Foot (feet).
ID = Identification.
NAVD88 = North American Vertical Datum of 1988
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 2 of 2
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.28
TABLE 2-4 HARBORTOWN AREA SITE CHARACTERIZATION ACTUAL ANALYTICAL PROGRAM
DETROIT RIVER AREA OF CONCERN, DETROIT, MICHIGAN (OCTOBER 2015 AND JUNE 2016)
Analytical Group and Method
Analytical
Interval'0'
Sample Location
Sample ID
Sample Depth
Interval (ft)
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.28
TABLE 2-4 HARBORTOWN AREA SITE CHARACTERIZATION ACTUAL ANALYTICAL PROGRAM
DETROIT RIVER AREA OF CONCERN, DETROIT, MICHIGAN (OCTOBER 2015 AND JUNE 2016)
Analytical Group and Method
Analytical
Interval'0'
Sample Location
Sample ID
Sample Depth
Interval (ft)
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.28
TABLE 2-4 HARBORTOWN AREA SITE CHARACTERIZATION ACTUAL ANALYTICAL PROGRAM
DETROIT RIVER AREA OF CONCERN, DETROIT, MICHIGAN (OCTOBER 2015 AND JUNE 2016)
Analytical Group and Method
Analytical
Interval'0'
Sample Location
Sample ID
Sample Depth
Interval (ft)
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.28
TABLE 2-4 HARBORTOWN AREA SITE CHARACTERIZATION ACTUAL ANALYTICAL PROGRAM
DETROIT RIVER AREA OF CONCERN, DETROIT, MICHIGAN (OCTOBER 2015 AND JUNE 2016)
Analytical Group and Method
Analytical
Interval'0'
Sample Location
Sample ID
Sample Depth
Interval (ft)
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.28
TABLE 2-4 HARBORTOWN AREA SITE CHARACTERIZATION ACTUAL ANALYTICAL PROGRAM
DETROIT RIVER AREA OF CONCERN, DETROIT, MICHIGAN (OCTOBER 2015 AND JUNE 2016)
Analytical Group and Method
Analytical
Interval'0'
Sample Location
Sample ID
Sample Depth
Interval (ft)
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.28
TABLE 2-4 HARBORTOWN AREA SITE CHARACTERIZATION ACTUAL ANALYTICAL PROGRAM
DETROIT RIVER AREA OF CONCERN, DETROIT, MICHIGAN (OCTOBER 2015 AND JUNE 2016)
Analytical Group and Method
Analytical
Interval'0'
Sample Location
Sample ID
Sample Depth
Interval (ft)
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.28
TABLE 2-4 HARBORTOWN AREA SITE CHARACTERIZATION ACTUAL ANALYTICAL PROGRAM
DETROIT RIVER AREA OF CONCERN, DETROIT, MICHIGAN (OCTOBER 2015 AND JUNE 2016)
Analytical Group and Method
Analytical
Interval'0'
Sample Location
Sample ID
Sample Depth
Interval (ft)
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
62561.28
TABLE 3-1 SUMMARY OF EXCEEDANCES, HT
1 ui.il NiiiiiIht nl
l'MTi-|ll.l!*l- "1
1 ul;il NiiiiiIht h|
Siihiiiilli-tl
1 ui;il NiiiiiIht h|
NiiiiiIht h|
NiiiiiIht h|
1 Vru-ni.iiii- u|
lVri'i-iil.ii*i- u|
S,|||||)|i's | li.il
Sllhlllllli-tl
S.|||||»|(S (W llllHlll
IViu'In (W iiliuiii
MM \\s
1 M
I'M
S.|||||)U s lli.il
S,|||||)|i's | li.il
I xuulsi M \\s
\ll.llxli'
S.|||||»|(S
1 Dm
1 Dm
1 l-<
I'M
K.lllu • |
1- \i'i-i-
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-2 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR GRAIN SIZE, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (feet):
HT 16-01
HT 16-02
HT 16-03
HT 16-04
HT 16-04
HT 16-05
HT 16-06
HT 16-07
HT 16-08
HT 16-01-SURF
HT16-02-SURF
HT 16-03-SURF
HT16-04-SURF
HT16-04-SURF-FD
HT 16-05-SURF
HT16-06-SURF
HT16-07-SURF
HT16-08-SURF
6/15/2016
6/7/2016
6/8/2016
6/8/2016
6/8/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/13/2016
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
Gravel
%
0
0
21.4
6.9
0.7
15
6
49
2.7
Coarse Sand
0/
/o
9.2
1.9
11.1
3.2
2
7.2
7.3
16
2.9
Medium Sand
0/
/o
1
2.1
12.1
4.9
4.7
11
40
9.5
5.2
Fine Sand
0/
/o
7.1
67.1
39.4
41.3
41
57
40
13
20.5
Sand
0/
/o
17.3
71.1
62.6
49.4
47.7
75
87
39
28.6
Silt
0/
/o
57.5
23.2
11.1
33.8
41.3
7.6
6.8
11.0
34.8
Clay
0/
/o
25.2
5.7
4.9
9.9
10.3
2.1
0.4
1.0
33.9
Silt + Clay
0/
/o
82.7
28.9
16.0
43.7
51.6
9.7
7.2
12.0
68.7
Hydrometer and Sieve Analysis
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
95
95.4
100
95
100
69
100
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
78.6
93.1
99.3
85
94
51
97.3
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
% passed
90.8
98.1
67.5
89.9
97.3
78
87
35
94.4
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
% passed
90.4
97.2
61.6
88
95.5
73
76
31
92.1
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
% passed
89.8
96
55.4
85
92.6
67
47
25
89.2
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
% passed
89
91.3
43.2
77.5
84.8
52
12
20
84.1
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
% passed
87.7
80.7
29.4
69.3
76.4
32
8.3
16
79.4
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
% passed
86.7
69
22.1
61.7
68.9
23
7.7
14
76.4
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
% passed
82.7
28.9
16
43.7
51.6
9.7
7.2
12
68.7
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
% passed
71
17.6
11.5
25
27.7
5.2
0.4
1.6
55.2
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
% passed
44.8
15.6
10
20
22.5
5.2
0.4
1.6
50.9
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
% passed
36.9
11.6
7.9
14.9
17.2
3.6
0.4
0.99
42.4
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
% passed
31.7
7.7
6.4
11.6
13.7
2.9
0.4
0.99
38.1
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
% passed
25.2
5.7
4.9
9.9
10.3
2.1
0.4
0.99
33.9
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
% passed
18.3
3.7
3.5
6.5
7.6
0.57
-0.13
0.42
27.5
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
% passed
10.8
3.7
2.7
4
5
0.38
-0.26
0.28
18.9
NOTES:
% = percent passed.
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT= Harbortown.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 5
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-2 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR GRAIN SIZE, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HT 16-09
HT16-12
HT16-13
HT16-14
HT16-15
HT16-16
HT16-17
HT16-17
HT16-18
Sample Name:
HT16-09-SURF
HT16-12-SURF
HT 16-13-SURF
HT16-14-SURF
HT 16-15-SURF
HT16-16-SURF
HT16-17-SURF
HT16-17-SURF-FD
HT16-18-SURF
Sample Date:
6/13/2016
6/14/2016
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
6/10/2016
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
6/14/2016
Depth Interval (feet):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
Gravel
%
8.6
0
0
14
0
3.7
0
0
12.6
Coarse Sand
0/
/o
15
0.5
1.6
8.4
1.6
15.3
1.1
0.8
42.2
Medium Sand
0/
/o
35.8
0.6
7
12
5.6
52.1
1.2
1
0.3
Fine Sand
0/
/o
29.4
4.3
30
60
50
22.3
13
8
0.5
Sand
0/
/o
80.2
5.4
39
80
57
89.7
15
9.8
43
Silt
0/
/o
7.8
60.9
53.0
4.9
29.0
3.8
60.0
65.0
39.4
Clay
0/
/o
3.4
33.7
8.4
1.4
14.0
2.8
25.0
25.0
5.0
Silt + Clay
0/
/o
11.2
94.6
61.4
6.3
43.0
6.6
85.0
90.0
44.4
Hydrometer and Sieve Analysis
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
97
100
100
96
100
100
100
100
97.2
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
% passed
91.4
100
100
86
100
96.3
100
100
87.4
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
% passed
76.4
99.5
98
78
98
81
99
99
45.2
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
% passed
58.1
99.3
97
73
97
59.7
99
99
45
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
% passed
40.6
98.9
91
66
93
28.9
98
98
44.9
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
% passed
24.9
98.6
85
42
84
9.7
93
96
44.8
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
% passed
17.9
98.1
81
25
71
7.4
90
95
44.7
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
% passed
15
97.8
77
16
65
7.1
89
94
44.7
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
% passed
11.2
94.6
61
6.3
43
6.6
85
90
44.4
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
% passed
7.6
76.5
18
3.5
38
4.1
50
46
17.4
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
% passed
6.4
59.1
12
3
24
3.7
43
41
9.6
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
% passed
4.6
48.4
10
2.5
21
3.3
35
35
8.3
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
% passed
4
40.4
9.2
2
18
3.3
30
29
6.3
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
% passed
3.4
33.7
8.4
1.4
14
2.8
25
25
5
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
% passed
1.6
24.1
4.1
0.39
10
2.3
16
16
3.3
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
% passed
0.3
16.4
1.9
0.26
5.4
2.3
9.2
8.9
1.8
NOTES:
% = percent passed.
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT= Harbortown.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 2 of 5
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-2 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR GRAIN SIZE, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (feet):
HT16-19
HT 16-20
HT 16-21
HT 16-21
HT 16-22
HT 16-23
HT 16-24
HT 16-25
HT 16-25
HT16-19-SURF
HT16-20-SURF
HT 16-21-SURF
HT 16-21-SURF-FD
HT16-22-SURF
HT 16-23-SURF
HT16-24-SURF
HT 16-25-SURF
HT16-25-SURF-FD
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/9/2016
6/9/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
Gravel
%
0
1.4
6.2
7.9
6.6
7.5
11.3
0
0
Coarse Sand
0/
/o
3.7
2.1
6.1
7.7
4.2
9.6
5.9
0
0
Medium Sand
0/
/o
0.3
8.4
16.4
14.7
10.6
13.6
6
2.7
2.5
Fine Sand
0/
/o
2.5
76
62.4
61.6
72.1
64.1
24
6.4
5.7
Sand
0/
/o
6.5
86
84.9
84
86.9
87.3
35.9
9.1
8.2
Silt
0/
/o
74.0
10.0
7.0
6.1
2.8
4.2
29.9
55.1
67.5
Clay
0/
/o
20.0
2.1
1.9
2.0
3.7
1.0
22.9
35.8
24.3
Silt + Clay
0/
/o
94.0
12.1
8.9
8.1
6.5
5.2
52.8
90.9
91.8
Hydrometer and Sieve Analysis
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
97.3
100
100
93.6
100
100
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
% passed
100
99
93.8
92.1
93.4
92.5
88.7
100
100
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
% passed
96
97
87.7
84.4
89.2
82.9
82.8
100
100
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
% passed
96
95
80.9
78.8
86.5
77.8
79.7
98.6
98.6
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
% passed
96
88
71.3
69.7
78.6
69.3
76.8
97.3
97.5
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
% passed
96
64
44.3
42.8
54.2
48.7
70.8
96.1
96.5
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
% passed
95
45
26.8
25.7
31.2
29.5
63.7
94.5
95.4
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
% passed
95
34
19.2
18.4
19.4
18.9
59.6
93.7
94.8
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
% passed
94
12
8.9
8.1
6.5
5.2
52.8
90.9
91.8
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
% passed
42
4.4
4.6
4.2
5
1
34.2
64.5
65.1
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
% passed
33
3.6
3.9
3.6
5
1
31.5
56.3
41.8
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
% passed
26
3.6
3.2
3.1
5
1
28.9
52.2
37.9
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
% passed
24
2.1
2.5
2.5
3.7
1
24.2
42
30.1
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
% passed
20
2.1
1.9
2
3.7
1
22.9
35.8
24.3
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
% passed
11
0.57
0.5
0.9
3.5
1
17.1
25.1
14.1
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
% passed
3.4
0.38
0.3
0.3
2.8
1
12.9
18.9
10.2
NOTES:
% = percent passed.
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT= Harbortown.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 3 of 5
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-2 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR GRAIN SIZE, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (feet):
HT 16-26
HT 16-27
HT 16-28
HT 16-30
HT 16-31
HT 16-32
HT16-33
HBT 15-A
HBT15-B
HT16-26-SURF
HT16-27-SURF
HT16-28-SURF
HT16-30-SURF
HT 16-31-SURF
HT16-32-SURF
HT 16-3 3-SURF
HBT15-A-SURF
HBT15-B-SURF
6/10/2016
6/9/2016
6/14/2016
6/8/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/8/2016
10/27/2015
10/27/2015
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
Gravel
%
0
52.2
0
11
32
13
5.3
0
21.2
Coarse Sand
0/
/o
0
9.8
0
6.7
9.8
12
2.9
0
18.5
Medium Sand
0/
/o
0.6
2.2
1
15.1
8.8
14
1.9
1.1
19.1
Fine Sand
0/
/o
2.7
20.2
1.5
58.8
44
50
81.5
22.3
32.6
Sand
0/
/o
3.3
32.2
2.5
80.6
63
75
86.3
23.4
70.2
Silt
0/
/o
65.1
12.5
74.0
6.9
3.6
9.7
7.5
60.5
6.8
Clay
0/
/o
31.6
3.1
24.0
1.5
1.1
2.3
1.0
16.1
1.8
Silt + Clay
0/
/o
96.7
15.6
98.0
8.4
4.7
12.0
8.5
76.6
8.6
Hydrometer and Sieve Analysis
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
73.5
100
95
91
94
100
100
94.1
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
% passed
100
47.8
100
89
68
87
94.7
100
78.8
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
% passed
100
38
100
82.3
58
75
91.8
100
60.3
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
% passed
99.7
37.1
99
78
55
69
91.2
99.5
48.7
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
% passed
99.4
35.8
99
67.2
49
61
89.9
98.9
41.2
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
% passed
99
31.8
99
41.8
37
51
81.9
98
29.3
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
% passed
98.6
28.4
99
26.8
21
40
57.8
97.5
17.3
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
% passed
98.3
26.6
98
19.6
13
30
35
94.9
12.6
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
% passed
96.7
15.6
98
8.4
4.8
12
8.4
76.6
8.6
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
% passed
58.3
10.3
58
4.4
3.7
4.6
2.1
42.4
4
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
% passed
51.2
6.4
44
3.8
3.1
4.6
2.1
35.3
3.4
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
% passed
44.1
5.3
37
3.2
2.4
3.5
2.1
25.7
2.8
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
% passed
38.7
3.6
27
2.1
2.4
2.9
1.5
20.9
2.5
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
% passed
31.6
3.1
24
1.5
1.1
2.3
1
16.1
1.9
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
% passed
20.9
0.4
13
1
1.1
1.1
1
11.4
1
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
% passed
11.6
0.3
9.8
1
1.1
1.1
1
9
0.6
NOTES:
% = percent passed.
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT= Harbortown.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 4 of 5
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-2 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR GRAIN SIZE, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HBT15-C
Sample Name:
HBT15-C-SURF
Sample Date:
10/30/2015
Depth Interval (feet):
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
Gravel
%
36.2
Coarse Sand
0/
/o
16.4
Medium Sand
0/
/o
13.5
Fine Sand
0/
/o
32.6
Sand
0/
/o
62.5
Silt
0/
/o
1.2
Clay
0/
/o
0.1
Silt + Clay
0/
/o
1.3
Hydrometer and Sieve Analysis
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
89.3
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
% passed
63.8
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
% passed
47.4
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
% passed
39.9
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
% passed
33.9
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
% passed
13.2
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
% passed
3.9
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
% passed
2.2
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
% passed
1.3
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
% passed
0.6
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
% passed
0.6
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
% passed
0.6
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
% passed
0.1
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
% passed
0.1
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
% passed
0.1
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
% passed
0.1
NOTES:
% = percent passed.
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT= Harbortown.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 5 of 5
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC TABLE 3-3 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR AMMONIA, HT
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (feet):
HBT 15-A
HBT15-B
HBT15-C
HBT15-A-SURF
HBT15-B-SURF
HBT15-C-SURF
10/27/2015
10/27/2015
10/30/2015
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
Ammonia
mg/kg
140
7.5 U
8
NOTES:
* Locations HBT15-A, -B, and -C were collected during the Riverbend Area Site Characterization field investigation in October 2015 (EA 2016c).
HBT = Harbortown Area.
mg/kg = Milligram(s) per kilogram.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan Page 1 of 1
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HT 16-01
HT 16-01
HT 16-01
HT 16-02
HT 16-02
HT 16-02
HT 16-02
Sample Name:
HT16-01-SURF
HT16-01-0010
HT16-01-1030
HT16-02-SURF
HT16-02-0010
HT16-02-1020
HT16-02-2030
Sample Date:
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/7/2016
6/9/2016
6/9/2016
6/9/2016
Depth Interval (feet):
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
0-1
1-2
2-3
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
92 U
61 U
40 U
72 U
65 U
49 U
49 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
92 U
61 U
40 U
72 U
65 U
49 U
49 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
92 U
61 U
40 U
72 U
65 U
49 U
49 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
92 U
61 U
40 U
72 U
65 U
49 U
49 U
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
92 U
61 U
40 U
72 U
65 U
49 U
49 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
8.3 J
11 J
40 U
26 J
43 J
110
49 U
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
92 U
61 U
40 U
12 J
15 J
49 U
49 U
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
92 U
61 U
40 U
72 U
65 U
49 U
49 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
92 U
61 U
40 U
72 U
65 U
47 J
49 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
Hg/kg
8.3
11
0
38
58
157
0
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value.
linlded and Shaded dclcclcd \ allies exceed PEC screening \alue.
Hg/kg = Microgram(s) per kilogram.
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown Area .
ND = Non-detect.
NSL = No Screening Level.
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Qualifiers:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equal to the
method detection limit (value is estimated).
J - = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J + = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (feet):
HT16-03
HT 16-03
HT16-03
HT 16-04
HT 16-04
HT 16-04
HT 16-05
HT16-03-SURF
HT16-03-0010
HT16-03-1030
HT16-04-SURF
HT16-04-SURF-FD
HT16-04-0010
HT16-05-SURF
6/8/2016
6/9/2016
6/9/2016
6/8/2016
6/8/2016
6/10/2016
6/14/2016
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-1
0-5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
50 U
37 U
38 U
57 U
63 U
38 U
64 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
50 U
37 U
38 U
57 U
63 U
38 U
64 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
50 U
37 U
38 U
57 U
63 U
38 U
64 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
50 U
37 U
38 U
57 U
63 U
38 U
64 U
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
50 U
37 U
38 U
57 U
63 U
38 U
64 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
17 J
37 U
38 U
13 J
22 J
38 U
7.6 J
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
50 U
37 U
38 U
57 U
63 U
38 U
9.9 J
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
50 U
37 U
38 U
57 U
63 U
38 U
64 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
50 U
37 U
38 U
57 U
63 U
38 U
64 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
Hg/kg
17
0
0
13
22
0
17.5
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value.
linlded and Shaded dclcclcd \ allies exceed PEC screening \alue.
Hg/kg = Microgram(s) per kilogram.
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown Area .
ND = Non-detect.
NSL = No Screening Level.
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Qualifiers:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equal to the
method detection limit (value is estimated).
J - = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J + = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 2 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HT 16-05
HT16-05
HT16-05
HT16-05
HT16-06
HT16-06
HT16-06
Sample Name:
HT16-05-0010
HT16-05-1020
HT16-05-1020-FD
HT16-05-2040
HT16-06-SURF
HT16-06-0010
HT16-06-1030
Sample Date:
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/14/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
Depth Interval (feet):
0-1
1-2
1-2
2-4
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
50 UJ
37 U
38 U
39 U
43 U
36 U
38 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
50 UJ
37 U
38 U
39 U
43 U
36 U
38 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
50 UJ
37 U
38 U
39 U
43 U
36 U
38 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
50 UJ
37 U
38 U
39 U
43 U
36 U
38 U
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
50 UJ
37 U
38 U
39 U
43 U
36 U
38 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
5 .2 J
37 U
38 U
39 U
5.3 J
36 U
38 U
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
9.1 J-
37 U
38 U
39 U
5.5 J
36 U
38 U
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
50 UJ
37 U
38 U
39 U
43 U
36 U
38 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
50 UJ
37 U
38 U
39 U
43 U
36 U
38 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
Hg/kg
14.3
0
0
0
10.8
0
0
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value.
liulded and Shaded dclcclcd \ allies exceed IM.( screening \alue.
Hg/kg = Microgram(s) per kilogram.
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown Area .
ND = Non-detect.
NSL = No Screening Level.
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Qualifiers:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equal to the
method detection limit (value is estimated).
J - = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J + = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 3 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HT 16-07
HT16-07
HT16-07
HT16-07
HT16-07
HT16-07
HT16-08
Sample Name:
HT16-07-SURF
HT16-07-0010
HT16-07-1025
HT16-07-1025-FD
HT16-07-2540
HT16-07-4060
HT16-08-SURF
Sample Date:
6/14/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/13/2016
Depth Interval (feet):
0-0.5
0-1
1-2.5
1-2.5
2.5-4
4-6
0-0.5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
41 U
81 U
41 U
40 U
39 U
38 U
39 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
41 U
81 U
41 U
40 U
39 U
38 U
39 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
41 U
81 U
41 U
40 U
39 U
38 U
39 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
41 U
81 U
41 U
40 U
39 U
38 U
39 U
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
41 U
81 U
41 U
40 U
39 U
38 U
39 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
230
82
41 U
40 U
39 U
38 U
39 U
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
53
58 J
41 U
40 U
39 U
38 U
39 U
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
41 U
81 U
41 U
40 U
39 U
38 U
39 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
41 U
81 U
41 U
40 U
39 U
38 U
39 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
Hg/kg
283
140
0
0
0
0
0
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value.
liulded and Shaded dclcclcd \ allies exceed IM.( screening \alue.
Hg/kg = Microgram(s) per kilogram.
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown Area .
ND = Non-detect.
NSL = No Screening Level.
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Qualifiers:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equal to the
method detection limit (value is estimated).
J - = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J + = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 4 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (feet):
HT16-08
HT16-08
HT16-08
HT16-09
HT 16-09
HT16-09
HT16-09
HT16-08-0010
HT16-08-1030
HT16-08-1030-FD
HT16-09-SURF
HT16-09-0010
HT16-09-1030
HT16-09-1030-FD
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/13/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
0-1
1-3
1-3
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
1-3
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
40 U
40 U
39 U
43 R
39 U
40 U
40 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
40 U
40 U
39 U
43 R
39 U
40 U
40 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
40 U
40 U
39 U
43 R
39 U
40 U
40 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
40 U
40 U
39 U
43 R
39 U
40 U
40 U
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
40 U
40 U
39 U
43 R
39 U
40 U
40 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
2.5 J
40 U
39 U
77 J-
170
3.5 J
5.7 J
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
40 U
40 U
39 U
69 J-
160
3.3 J
6.5 J
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
40 U
40 U
39 U
43 R
39 U
40 U
40 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
40 U
40 U
39 U
43 R
39 U
40 U
40 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
Hg/kg
2.5
0
0
447
330
6.8
12.2
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value.
linlded and Shaded dclcclcd \ allies exceed PEC screening \alue.
Hg/kg = Microgram(s) per kilogram.
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown Area .
ND = Non-detect.
NSL = No Screening Level.
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Qualifiers:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equal to the
method detection limit (value is estimated).
J - = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J + = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 5 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (feet):
HT16-10
HT16-10
HT16-11
HT16-11
HT16-11
HT16-11
HT16-12
HT16-12
HT16-10-0010
HT16-10-1030
HT 16-11-SURF
HT16-11-0010
HT16-11-1015
HT16-11-1530
HT16-12-SURF
HT16-12-0010
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/10/2016
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
6/14/2016
6/15/2016
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
0-1
1-1.5
1.5-3
0-0.5
0-1
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
37 U
39 U
560 U
50 U
51 U
39 U
71 U
69 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
37 U
39 U
560 U
50 U
51 U
39 U
71 U
69 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
37 U
39 U
560 U
50 U
51 U
39 U
71 U
69 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
37 U
39 U
560 U
50 U
51 U
39 U
71 U
69 U
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
170
56
35000
50 U
51 U
39 U
71 U
69 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
52
16 J
5400 J
880
130 J+
39 U
290
470
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
25 J
6.5 J
950
270 J
52 J
39 U
140
170 J
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
37 U
39 U
560 U
50 U
51 U
39 U
71 U
69 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
37 U
39 U
560 IT
50 U
51 U
39 U
71 U
69 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
Hg/kg
247
78.5
41350
1150
182
0
430
640
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value.
linlded and Shaded dclcclcd \ allies exceed PEC screening \alue.
Hg/kg = Microgram(s) per kilogram.
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown Area .
ND = Non-detect.
NSL = No Screening Level.
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Qualifiers:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equal to the
method detection limit (value is estimated).
J - = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J + = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 6 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (feet):
HT16-12
HT16-12
HT16-12
HT16-13
HT16-13
HT16-13
HT16-13
HT16-12-1020
HT16-12-2035
HT16-12-3550
HT 16-13-SURF
HT16-13-0010
HT16-13-1030
HT16-13-1030-FD
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/13/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
1-2
2-3.5
3.5-5
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
1-3
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
70 U
53 U
40 U
56 U
48 U
52 U
56 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
70 U
53 U
40 U
56 U
48 U
52 U
56 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
70 U
53 U
40 U
56 U
48 U
52 U
56 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
70 U
53 U
40 U
56 U
48 U
52 U
56 U
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
70 U
53 U
40 U
56 U
48 U
52 U
56 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
11 J
3.2 J
40 U
160
180
120 J
140 J
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
13 J
4.7 J
40 U
71
67
120
110
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
70 U
53 U
40 U
56 U
48 U
52 U
56 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
70 U
53 U
40 U
56 U
48 U
52 U
56 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
Hg/kg
24
7.9
0
231
247
240
250
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value.
linlded and Shaded dclcclcd \ allies exceed PEC screening \alue.
Hg/kg = Microgram(s) per kilogram.
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown Area .
ND = Non-detect.
NSL = No Screening Level.
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Qualifiers:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equal to the
method detection limit (value is estimated).
J - = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J + = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 7 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HT16-13
HT16-14
HT16-14
HT16-14
HT16-15
HT16-15
HT16-15
Sample Name:
HT16-13-3050
HT16-14-SURF
HT16-14-0010
HT16-14-1030
HT16-15-SURF
HT16-15-0010
HT16-15-1030
Sample Date:
6/14/2016
6/13/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/13/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
Depth Interval (feet):
3-5
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
39 U
44 U
38 U
39 U
87 U
45 U
40 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
39 U
44 U
38 U
39 U
87 U
45 U
40 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
39 U
44 U
38 U
39 U
87 U
45 U
40 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
39 U
44 U
38 U
39 U
87 U
45 U
40 U
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
39 U
44 U
38 U
39 U
87 U
45 U
40 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
39 U
310
11 J
39 U
310
180 J
40 U
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
39 U
83
8 J
39 U
130
63
40 U
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
39 U
44 U
38 U
39 U
87 U
45 U
40 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
39 U
44 U
38 U
39 U
87 U
45 U
40 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
Hg/kg
0
393
19
0
440
243
0
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value.
liulded and Shaded dclcclcd \ allies exceed IM.( screening \alue.
Hg/kg = Microgram(s) per kilogram.
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown Area .
ND = Non-detect.
NSL = No Screening Level.
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Qualifiers:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equal to the
method detection limit (value is estimated).
J - = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J + = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 8 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (feet):
HT16-16
HT16-16
HT16-16
HT16-16
HT16-16
HT16-16
HT16-17
HT16-16-SURF
HT16-16-0010
HT16-16-1030
HT16-16-1030-FD
HT16-16-3055
HT16-16-5570
HT16-17-SURF
6/10/2016
6/12/2016
6/12/2016
6/12/2016
6/12/2016
6/12/2016
6/13/2016
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
1-3
3-5.5
5.5-7
0-0.5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
43 U
41 U
40 UJ
41 U
53 U
39 U
91 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
43 U
41 U
40 UJ
41 U
53 U
39 U
91 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
43 U
41 U
40 UJ
41 U
53 U
39 U
91 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
43 U
41 U
40 UJ
41 U
53 U
39 U
91 U
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
43 U
41 U
40 UJ
41 U
53 U
39 U
91 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
210
210 J
1900 J
1300 J
53 U
39 U
230
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
170
130
1000
580
53 U
39 U
210
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
43 U
41 U
40 UJ
41 U
53 U
39 U
91 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
43 U
41 U
40 UJ
41 U
53 U
39 U
91 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
Hg/kg
380
340
2900
IX,SO
0
0
440
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value.
liulded and Shaded dclcclcd \ allies exceed IM.( screening \alue.
Hg/kg = Microgram^) per kilogram.
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown Area .
ND = Non-detect.
NSL = No Screening Level.
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Qualifiers:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equal to the
method detection limit (value is estimated).
J - = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J + = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 9 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (feet):
HT16-17
HT16-17
HT16-17
HT16-17
HT16-18
HT16-18
HT16-18
HT16-17-SURF-FD
HT16-17-0015
HT16-17-1530
HT16-17-3050
HT16-18-SURF
HT16-18B-0010
HT16-18B-1030
6/13/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
0-0.5
0-1.5
1.5-3
3-5
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
88 U
38 U
44 U
41 U
40 U
40 U
45 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
88 U
38 U
44 U
41 U
40 U
40 U
45 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
88 U
38 U
44 U
41 U
40 U
40 U
45 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
88 U
38 U
44 U
41 U
40 U
40 U
770 J
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
88 U
38 U
44 U
41 U
40 U
40 U
45 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
250
120
44 U
41 U
96
250
660 J
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
250
110
8.3 J
41 U
57
200
340
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
88 U
38 U
44 U
41 U
40 U
40 U
45 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
88 U
38 U
44 U
41 U
40 U
40 U
45 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
Hg/kg
500
230
8.3
0
153
450
1770
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value.
liulded and Shaded dclcclcd \ allies exceed IM.( screening \alue.
Hg/kg = Microgram(s) per kilogram.
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown Area .
ND = Non-detect.
NSL = No Screening Level.
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Qualifiers:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equal to the
method detection limit (value is estimated).
J - = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J + = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 10 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HT16-18
HT16-18
HT16-18
HT16-18
HT16-18
HT16-18
Sample Name:
HT16-18B-3050
HT16-18B-3050-FD
HT16-18B-5070
HT16-18C-0010
HT16-18C-1025
HT16-18C-2540
Sample Date:
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
Depth Interval (feet):
3-5
3-5
5-7
0-1
1-2.5
2.5-4
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
45 U
48 U
40 U
42 U
40 U
40 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
45 U
48 U
40 U
42 U
40 U
40 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
45 U
48 U
40 U
42 U
40 U
40 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
45 U
48 U
40 U
42 U
40 U
40 U
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
45 U
48 U
40 U
42 U
40 U
40 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
45 U
48 U
40 U
2400 J
42 J
40 U
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
45 U
48 U
40 U
1400
64
40 U
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
45 U
48 U
40 U
42 U
40 U
40 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
45 U
48 U
40 U
42 U
40 U
40 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
Hg/kg
0
0
0
3SUO
106
0
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value.
linlded and Shaded dclcclcd \ allies exceed PEC screening \alue.
Hg/kg = Microgram^; per kilogram.
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown Area .
ND = Non-detect.
NSL = No Screening Level.
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Qualifiers:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equal to the
method detection limit (value is estimated).
J - = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J + = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 11 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (feet):
HT16-19
HT16-19
HT16-19
HT16-19
HT16-19
HT 16-20
HT 16-20
HT16-19-SURF
HT16-19-0010
HT16-19-1030
HT16-19-3050
HT16-19-5070
HT16-20-SURF
HT16-20-0010
6/13/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/13/2016
6/14/2016
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-5
5-7
0-0.5
0-1
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
78 U
70 U
65 U
59 UJ
39 U
56 U
74 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
78 U
70 U
65 U
59 UJ
39 U
56 U
74 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
78 U
70 U
65 U
59 UJ
39 U
56 U
74 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
78 U
70 U
65 U
59 UJ
39 U
56 U
74 U
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
78 U
70 U
65 U
59 UJ
39 U
1200
74 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
120
3600
1900
22 J
39 U
2100
710
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
83
1400
340
14 J-
39 U
2200
510
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
78 U
70 U
65 U
59 UJ
39 U
56 U
74 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
78 U
70 U
65 U
59 UJ
39 U
56 U
74 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
Hg/kg
203
5000
2240
36
0
5500
1220
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value.
linlded and Shaded dclcclcd \ allies exceed PEC screening \alue.
Hg/kg = Microgram(s) per kilogram.
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown Area .
ND = Non-detect.
NSL = No Screening Level.
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Qualifiers:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equal to the
method detection limit (value is estimated).
J - = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J + = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 12 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (feet):
HT 16-20
HT 16-20
HT 16-21
HT 16-21
HT 16-21
HT 16-21
HT 16-22
HT16-20-1035
HT16-20-3550
HT 16-21-SURF
HT 16-21 -SURF-FD
HT16-21-0010
HT16-21-1030
HT16-22-SURF
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
6/10/2016
1-3.5
3.5-5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
52 U
38 U
45 U
44 U
40 U
40 U
46 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
52 U
38 U
45 U
44 U
40 U
40 U
46 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
52 U
38 U
45 U
44 U
40 U
40 U
46 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
52 U
38 U
45 U
44 U
40 U
40 U
46 U
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
52 U
38 U
45 U
44 U
40 U
40 U
46 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
1000 J
4.1 J
260
460
970
40 U
2500 J
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
280
38 U
260
430
340
40 U
2200
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
52 U
38 U
45 U
44 U
40 U
40 U
46 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
52 IT
38 U
45 U
44 U
40 U
40 U
46 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
Hg/kg
1280
4.1
520
890
1310
0
4700
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value.
liulded and Shaded dclcclcd \ allies exceed IM.( screening \alue.
Hg/kg = Microgram(s) per kilogram.
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown Area .
ND = Non-detect.
NSL = No Screening Level.
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Qualifiers:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equal to the
method detection limit (value is estimated).
J - = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J + = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 13 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (feet):
HT 16-22
HT 16-22
HT 16-23
HT 16-23
HT 16-23
HT 16-23
HT 16-23
HT16-22-0010
HT 16-22-1030
HT 16-23-SURF
HT16-23-0005
HT16-23-0515
HT16-23-1535
HT16-23-90100
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
6/9/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
0-0.5
0.5-1.5
1.5-3.5
9-10
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
39 U
40 U
47 U
38 U
37 U
40 U
39 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
39 U
40 U
47 U
38 U
37 U
40 U
39 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
39 U
40 U
47 U
38 U
37 U
40 U
39 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
5.5 J
40 U
47 U
38 U
37 U
40 U
39 U
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
39 U
40 U
47 U
38 U
37 U
40 U
39 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
39 U
40 U
420
560
27 J
8.7 J
39 U
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
39 U
40 U
410
190 J
7.6 J
3.4 J
39 U
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
39 U
40 U
47 U
38 U
37 U
40 U
39 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
39 U
40 U
47 U
38 U
37 U
40 U
39 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
Hg/kg
5.5
0
830
750
34.6
12.1
0
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value.
linlded and Shaded dclcclcd \ allies exceed PEC screening \alue.
Hg/kg = Microgram(s) per kilogram.
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown Area .
ND = Non-detect.
NSL = No Screening Level.
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Qualifiers:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equal to the
method detection limit (value is estimated).
J - = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J + = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 14 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561
Location ID:
HT 16-23
HT 16-23
HT 16-23
HT 16-24
HT 16-24
HT 16-24
Sample Name:
HT16-23-100110-DS
HT16-23-110130-DS
HT16-23-150160
HT16-24-SURF
HT16-24-0010
HT16-24-1030
Sample Date:
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/9/2016
6/12/2016
6/12/2016
Depth Interval (feet):
10-11
11-13
15-16
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
39 U
40 U
39 U
42 U
38 U
40 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
39 U
40 U
39 U
42 U
38 U
40 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
39 U
40 U
39 U
42 U
38 U
40 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
39 U
40 U
39 U
42 U
38 U
40 U
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
39 U
40 U
39 U
42 U
38 U
40 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
23 J+
6.5 J
39 U
150
38 U
40 U
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
16 J+
3 J
39 U
170
38 U
40 U
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
39 U
40 U
39 U
42 U
38 U
40 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
39 U
40 U
39 U
42 U
38 U
40 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
Hg/kg
39
9.5
0
320
0
0
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value.
liulded and Shaded dclcclcd \ allies exceed IM.( screening \alue.
Hg/kg = Microgram(s) per kilogram.
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown Area .
ND = Non-detect.
NSL = No Screening Level.
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Qualifiers:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equal to the
method detection limit (value is estimated).
J - = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J + = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 15 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (feet):
HT 16-25
HT 16-25
HT 16-25
HT 16-25
HT 16-26
HT 16-26
HT 16-26
HT 16-25-SURF
HT16-25-SURF-FD
HT16-25-0010
HT16-25-1030
HT16-26-SURF
HT16-26-0010
HT16-26-1030
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
6/10/2016
6/12/2016
6/12/2016
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
73 U
76 U
51 U
39 U
70 U
40 U
40 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
73 U
76 U
51 U
39 U
70 U
40 U
40 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
73 U
76 U
51 U
39 U
70 U
40 U
40 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
73 U
76 U
51 U
39 U
70 U
40 U
40 U
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
73 U
76 U
51 U
39 U
70 U
40 U
40 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
160
120
13 J
39 U
110
40 U
40 U
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
100
79
9.1 J
39 U
52 J
40 U
40 U
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
73 U
76 U
51 U
39 U
70 U
40 U
40 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
73 U
76 U
51 U
39 U
70 U
40 U
40 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
Hg/kg
260
199
22.1
0
162
0
0
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value.
linlded and Shaded dclcclcd \ allies exceed PEC screening \alue.
Hg/kg = Microgram(s) per kilogram.
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown Area .
ND = Non-detect.
NSL = No Screening Level.
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Qualifiers:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equal to the
method detection limit (value is estimated).
J - = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J + = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 16 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HT 16-27
HT 16-27
HT 16-27
HT 16-27
HT 16-27
HT16-28
HT16-28
Sample Name:
HT16-27-SURF
HT16-27-0010
HT16-27-1020
HT16-27-2030
HT16-27-3040
HT16-28-SURF
HT16-28-0010
Sample Date:
6/9/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/14/2016
6/12/2016
Depth Interval (feet):
0-0.5
0-1
1-2
2-3
3-4
0-0.5
0-1
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
49 U
47 U
36 U
38 U
38 U
62 U
72 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
49 U
47 U
36 U
38 U
38 U
62 U
72 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
49 U
47 U
36 U
38 U
38 U
62 U
72 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
49 U
47 U
36 U
38 U
38 U
62 U
72 U
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
49 U
47 U
36 U
38 U
38 U
62 U
72 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
120
430 J
220 J+
5.1 J
4.1 J
60 J
430
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
120
220 J
66 J
38 U
38 U
28 J
150
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
49 U
47 U
36 U
38 U
38 U
62 U
72 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
49 U
47 U
36 U
38 U
38 U
62 U
72 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
Hg/kg
240
650
286
5.1
4.1
88
580
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value.
liulded and Shaded dclcclcd \ allies exceed IM.( screening \alue.
Hg/kg = Microgram(s) per kilogram.
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown Area .
ND = Non-detect.
NSL = No Screening Level.
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Qualifiers:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equal to the
method detection limit (value is estimated).
J - = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J + = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 17 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HT16-28
HT16-28
HT16-28
HT 16-29
HT 16-29
HT 16-29
HT 16-29
Sample Name:
HT16-28-1020
HT16-28-6575
HT16-28-7590
HT16-29-SURF
HT16-29-1020
HT16-29-2035
HT16-29-3550
Sample Date:
6/12/2016
6/12/2016
6/12/2016
6/14/2016
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
Depth Interval (feet):
1-2
6.5-7.5
7.5-9
0-0.5
1-2
2-3.5
3.5-5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
39 U
39 U
57 UJ
44 U
41 U
44 U
40 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
39 U
39 U
57 UJ
44 U
41 U
44 U
40 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
39 U
39 U
57 UJ
44 U
41 U
44 U
40 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
39 U
39 U
57 UJ
44 U
41 U
44 U
40 U
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
39 U
39 U
57 UJ
44 U
41 U
44 U
40 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
34 J
39 U
57 UJ
34 J
20 J
44 U
40 U
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
12 J
39 U
57 UJ
20 J
30 J
44 U
40 U
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
39 U
39 U
57 UJ
44 U
41 U
44 U
40 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
39 U
39 U
57 UJ
44 U
41 U
44 U
40 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
Hg/kg
46
0
0
54
50
0
0
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value.
liulded and Shaded dclcclcd \ allies exceed IM.( screening \alue.
Hg/kg = Microgram(s) per kilogram.
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown Area .
ND = Non-detect.
NSL = No Screening Level.
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Qualifiers:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equal to the
method detection limit (value is estimated).
J - = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J + = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 18 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (feet):
HT 16-30
HT 16-30
HT 16-30
HT 16-30
HT 16-30
HT 16-30
HT 16-31
HT16-30-SURF
HT16-30-0010
HT16-30-1020
HT16-30-2030
HT16-30-2030-FD
HT16-30-3040
HT16-31-SURF
6/8/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/14/2016
0-0.5
0-1
1-2
2-3
2-3
3-4
0-0.5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
47 U
42 U
48 U
43 U
44 U
41 U
57 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
47 U
42 U
48 U
43 U
44 U
41 U
57 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
47 U
42 U
48 U
43 U
44 U
41 U
57 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
47 U
42 U
48 U
43 U
44 U
41 U
57 U
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
47 U
42 U
1100
43 U
44 U
41 U
57 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
200 J
1100
1200
220 J
200 J
41 U
510
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
180
160
140
85
86
41 U
420
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
47 U
42 U
48 U
43 U
44 U
41 U
57 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
47 U
42 U
48 U
43 U
44 U
41 U
57 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
Hg/kg
380
1260
2440
305
286
0
»>30
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value.
linlded and Shaded dclcclcd \ allies exceed PEC screening \alue.
Hg/kg = Microgram(s) per kilogram.
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown Area .
ND = Non-detect.
NSL = No Screening Level.
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Qualifiers:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equal to the
method detection limit (value is estimated).
J - = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J + = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 19 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (feet):
HT 16-31
HT 16-31
HT 16-31
HT16-32
HT16-32
HT16-32
HT16-33
HT16-31-0010
HT 16-31-0010-FD
HT16-31-1030
HT16-32-SURF
HT16-32-0010
HT16-32-1030
HT16-33-SURF
6/12/2016
6/12/2016
6/12/2016
6/14/2016
6/12/2016
6/12/2016
6/8/2016
0-1
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
40 U
42 U
40 U
47 U
39 U
38 U
46 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
40 U
42 U
40 U
47 U
39 U
38 U
46 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
40 U
42 U
40 U
47 U
39 U
38 U
46 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
40 U
42 U
40 U
47 U
39 U
38 U
46 U
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
40 U
42 U
40 U
47 U
39 U
38 U
46 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
6.2 J
3.5 J
40 U
880
18 J
38 U
380
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
4.7 J
42 U
40 U
460
10 J
38 U
410
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
40 U
42 U
40 U
47 U
39 U
38 U
46 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
40 U
42 U
40 U
47 U
39 U
38 U
46 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
Hg/kg
10.9
3.5
0
1340
28
0
790
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value.
liulded and Shaded dclcclcd \ allies exceed IM.( screening \alue.
Hg/kg = Microgram(s) per kilogram.
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown Area .
ND = Non-detect.
NSL = No Screening Level.
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Qualifiers:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equal to the
method detection limit (value is estimated).
J - = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J + = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 20 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (feet):
HT16-33
HT16-33
HBT 15-A
HBT 15-A
HBT 15-A
HBT 15-A
HBT 15-A
HT16-33-0010
HT16-33-1030
HBT15-A-SURF
HBT15-A-0010
HBT15-A-1030
HBT15-A-3050
HBT15-A-5070
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
10/27/2015
10/28/2015
10/28/2015
10/28/2015
10/28/2015
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-5
5-7
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
47 U
41 U
55 U
35 U
48 U
42 U
39 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
47 U
41 U
55 U
35 U
48 U
42 U
39 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
47 U
41 U
55 U
35 U
48 U
42 U
39 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
47 U
41 U
38 J
41 J
640
230
12 J
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
47 U
41 U
55 U
35 U
48 U
42 U
39 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
2300
41 U
98
110
1300
470
24 J
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
1700
41 U
72
78
540
230
13 J
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
47 U
41 U
55 U
35 U
48 U
42 U
39 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
47 U
41 U
55 U
35 U
48 U
42 U
39 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
Hg/kg
4000
0
208
229
2480
930
49
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value.
liulded and Shaded dclcclcd \ allies exceed IM.( screening \alue.
Hg/kg = Microgram(s) per kilogram.
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown Area .
ND = Non-detect.
NSL = No Screening Level.
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Qualifiers:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equal to the
method detection limit (value is estimated).
J - = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J + = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 21 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HBT 15-A
HBT15-B
HBT15-B
HBT15-B
HBT15-B
HBT15-B
HBT15-B
Sample Name:
HBT15-A-7010
HBT15-B-SURF
HBT15-B-0010
HBT15-B-1030
HBT15-B-3055
HBT15-B-3055-FD
HBT15-B-5560
Sample Date:
10/28/2015
10/27/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
Depth Interval (feet):
7-10
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-5.5
3-5.5
5.5-6
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
41 U
49 U
41 U
42 U
42 U
41 U
42 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
41 U
49 U
41 U
42 U
42 U
41 U
42 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
41 U
49 U
41 U
42 U
42 U
41 U
42 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
58
66
27 J
21 J
250
160
7.1 J
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
41 U
49 U
41 U
42 U
42 U
41 U
42 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
120 J
140
33 J
42 U
400
190
7.8 J
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
42
110
14 J
7.7 J
93
51
42 U
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
41 U
49 U
41 U
42 U
42 U
41 U
42 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
41 U
49 U
41 U
42 U
42 U
41 U
42 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
Hg/kg
220
316
74
28.7
743
401
14.9
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value.
liulded and Shaded dclcclcd \ allies exceed IM.( screening \alue.
Hg/kg = Microgram(s) per kilogram.
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown Area .
ND = Non-detect.
NSL = No Screening Level.
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Qualifiers:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equal to the
method detection limit (value is estimated).
J - = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J + = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 22 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (feet):
HBT15-C
HBT15-C
HBT15-C
HBT15-C
HBT15-C
HBT15-C
HBT15-C-SURF
HBT15-C-0010
HBT15-C-1030
HBT15-C-1030-FD
HBT15-C-3040
HBT15-C-4050
10/30/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
1-3
3-4
4-5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
43 U
42 U
40 U
39 U
39 U
40 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
43 U
42 U
40 U
39 U
39 U
40 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
43 U
42 U
40 U
39 U
39 U
40 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
52
150
9 J
7.9 J
39 U
40 U
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
43 U
42 U
40 U
39 U
39 U
40 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
43 U
250
7 J
7.3 J
39 U
40 U
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
86 J
79
40 U
39 U
39 U
40 U
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
43 U
42 U
40 U
39 U
39 U
40 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
Hg/kg
43 U
42 U
40 U
39 U
39 U
40 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
Hg/kg
138
479
16
15.2
0
0
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value.
linlded and Shaded dclcclcd \ allies exceed PEC screening \alue.
Hg/kg = Microgram(s) per kilogram.
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown Area .
ND = Non-detect.
NSL = No Screening Level.
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Qualifiers:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than or equal to the
method detection limit (value is estimated).
J - = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
J + = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate
concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 23 of 23
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-5 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (feet):
HT16-01
HT 16-01
HT16-01
HT 16-02
HT 16-02
HT 16-02
HT 16-02
HT 16-03
HT 16-03
HT 16-03
HT 16-04
HT16-04
HT 16-04
HT 16-05
HT16-01-SURF
HT16-01-0010
HT16-01-1030
HT16-02-SURF
HT16-02-0010
HT16-02-1020
HT16-02-2030
HT16-03-SURF
HT16-03-0010
HT16-03-1030
HT16-04-SURF
HT16-04-SURF-FD
HT16-04-0010
HT16-05-SURF
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/7/2016
6/9/2016
6/9/2016
6/9/2016
6/8/2016
6/9/2016
6/9/2016
6/8/2016
6/8/2016
6/10/2016
6/14/2016
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
0-1
1-2
2-3
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-1
0-5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
1 -Methylnaphthalene
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
140
24
11
26 J
130 J
110 J
11 J
1.8 J
3.8 U
0.52 J
3.9 J
4.6 J
4.9
1100 J
2-Methylnaphthalene(a)
20.2*
NSL
Mg/kg
220
35
12
23 J
130 J
82 J
12 J
1.8 J
3.8 U
0.44 J
3.4 J
4.6 J
5.4
940 J
Acenaphthenes(,
3036
171.5
21.5
37.2
783.3
561.7
79.88
-jn| |n
Total PAID4 ND=1/2RL
1610
22800
Mg/kg
3501.5
1421.4
758.91
13267
345Sn
31454
6007
362.8
53.8
90.86
1338.9
1159.1
336.58
14 Vn
NOTES:
(a) Analytes included in Total 17 PAH calculations.
(b) Analytes included in Total 34 PAH calculations.
Bolded delected \ sillies evceed TF.C screening \ sillie
Molded nnd Sluided delected values evceed I'KC screening \ nine
Hg/kg = Microgram(s) per kilogram.
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown Area.
ND =Non-detect.
NSL = No Screening Level.
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
RL = Reporting limit.
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Qualifiers:
J = Compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
J + = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased
high.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
TEC value based on USEPA Region 5 RCRA Ecological Screening Value (EPA 2003b).
Harbortown Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan Page 1 of 12
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-5 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (feet):
HT 16-05
HT 16-05
HT 16-05
HT16-05
HT16-06
HT 16-06
HT16-06
HT16-07
HT 16-07
HT16-07
HT 16-07
HT 16-07
HT 16-07
HT 16-08
HT16-05-0010
HT16-05-1020
HT16-05-1020-FD
HT 16-05-2040
HT16-06-SURF
HT16-06-0010
HT16-06-1030
HT16-07-SURF
HT16-07-0010
HT16-07-1025
HT16-07-1025-FD
HT16-07-2540
HT16-07-4060
HT16-08-SURF
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/14/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/14/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/13/2016
0-1
1-2
1-2
2-4
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
0-1
1-2.5
1-2.5
2.5-4
4-6
0-0.5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
1 -Methylnaphthalene
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
740 J
100
130 J
120
760 J
8.3 J
8.9
840 J
140000
4700
7300
120000
3600
220
2-Methylnaphthalene(a)
20.2*
NSL
Mg/kg
1000 J
140
380 J
220
870 J
36 J
9
860 J
200000
7300
11000
170000
5200
300
Acenaphthene(a) (b)
6.71*
NSL
Mg/kg
1700
130
380 J
100 J
2900
36 J
4 J
2000 J
98000 J
2000 J
4000 J
38000 J
2000 J
310
Acenaphthylene(a,(b'
5.87*
NSL
Mg'kg
1000 J
95 J
380 J
100 J
160 J
26 J
1.7 J
3200
200000
7800
12000
230000
5700
20 J
Anthracene'a"b'
57.2
845
Mg'kg
2,)llll
220 J
770 J
100 J
51(1(1
72
9.4
SI II III
*>S .1
2200
4111111.1
2 Mm
200
Benzo( a janthr acene(a,(b'
108
1050
Mg'kg
5SIIII
400 J
I4(iii .1
100 J
Willi
220
8.6
uooo
.1
2100
4111111.1
•J-
22(iii
130
Benzo(a)pyrene(a,(b'
150
1450
Mg'kg
4"! Ml
320 J
1100 J
100 J
NMIII
160
7.1
11
.1
2UUU .1
4 1
2
91
Benzo(b)fluoranthene'a''b'
10400*
NSL
Mg'kg
280 J
1000 J
18 J
150
10
7700
1
1 MUM J
42
50 J
Benzo(e )pyrene(b)
150
1450
Mg'kg
11M1
210 J
680 J
100U
52(ni
95
8.4
r.siiii
98000 U
2()()() I
45
66 U
Benzo(g,h,i )perylene(a,(b'
170*
NSL
Mg'kg
1800
140 J
440 J
100U
45UU
87
15
5800
98000 U
2000 J
4000 U
38000 J
2000 J
66 U
Benzo(k)fluoranthene'a"b'
240*
NSL
Mg'kg
5200
350
890
17 J
7200
150
6.9
8500
49000 J
1300 J
2300 J
60000
1400 J
62 J
CI Chryseiies(b)
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
2500 J
200 J
540 J
100U
4400 J
100 J
4 U
6000 J
98000 U
2000 U
4000 U
38000 U
2000 U
100 J
CI Fluorenes|b)
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
1000U
95 U
380 U
100U
1400U
36 U
4 U
2100 U
98000 U
2000 U
4000 U
38000 U
2000 U
110 J
CI -Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes(b)
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
8300 J
500 J
1500 J
100U
8700 J
380 J
10 J
18000 J
150000 J
3400 J
5600 J
150000 J
3600 J
440 J
CI -Naphthalenes'1''
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
1000U
170 J
380 U
240 J
1400U
36 U
6.3 J
2100 U
220000 J
8100 J
12000 J
200000 J
6000 J
360 J
CI -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b'
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
4600 J
350 J
1100 J
100U
4400 J
150 J
26 J
9900 J
140000 J
3700 J
5600 J
160000 J
3900 J
500 J
C2 Chrysenes|b)
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
1400 J
110 J
380 U
100U
1700 J
47 J
4 U
3400 J
98000 U
2000 U
4000 U
38000 U
2000 U
67 J
C2 Fluorenes|b)
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
1000U
95 U
380 U
100U
1400U
36 U
4 U
2100 U
98000 U
2000 U
4000 U
38000 U
2000 U
66 U
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
5000 J
240 J
560 J
100U
3800 J
180 J
6.9 J
7100 J
98000 U
2000 U
4000 U
38000 U
2000 U
150 J
C2-Naphthalenes'1''
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
5100 J
450 J
620 J
170 J
1900 J
44 J
9.2 J
4500 J
200000 J
5700 J
9200 J
180000 J
5500 J
810 J
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
3700 J
260 J
640 J
100U
1600 J
110 J
18 J
5200 J
98000 U
2000 U
4000 U
43000 J
2000 U
200 J
C3 Chrysenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
1000U
95 U
380 U
100U
1400 U
36 U
4 U
2100 U
98000 U
2000 U
4000 U
38000 U
2000 U
66 U
C3 Fluorenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
1100 J
95 U
380 U
100U
1400 U
36 U
4 U
2100 U
98000 U
2000 U
4000 U
38000 U
2000 U
66 U
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
1500 J
130 J
380 U
100U
1400 U
61 J
4 U
2100 U
98000 U
2000 U
4000 U
38000 U
2000 U
66 U
C3 -N aphthalenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
5200 J
420 J
700 J
180 J
1400 U
76 J
17 J
3800 J
98000 U
2000 U
4000 U
52000 J
2000 U
460 J
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
4700 J
290 J
600 J
110 J
1400 J
89 J
9.2 J
3100 J
98000 U
2000 U
4000 U
38000 U
2000 U
170 J
C4 Chrysenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
1000U
95 U
380 U
100U
1400 U
36 U
4 U
2100 U
98000 U
2000 U
4000 U
38000 U
2000 U
66 U
C4-Naphthalenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
2000 J
170 J
380 U
130 J
1400 U
39 J
4 U
2100 U
98000 U
2000 U
4000 U
38000 U
2000 U
160 J
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
2300 J
150 J
380 U
100U
1400 U
39 J
6.4 J
2100 U
98000 U
2000 U
4000 U
38000 U
2000 U
74 J
Chrysene'a"b'
166
1290
M£
6800
450 J
I4(i(i-1
100 J
1
220
17
.1
2000.1
4 1
2 1
130
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene'a"b'
33
NSL
M£
920.1
f.l J
21H1.1
100U
ISIIII
29 J
2.1 J
15(1(1.1
98000 U
200.1
"SI III.1
|*m.l
11 J
Fluoranthene(a) (b)
423
2230
M£
I4IIIHI
'J50 J
^'iiiii-1
100 J
410
23
If.
4900
—mi
22
4lJnn
280
Fluorene'a"b'
77.4
536
M£
2 Mmi
160
38i i.l
100 J
.i.imi
36 J
5
35(i(i
15
5100
-Mill
43(1(1
180
Indeno(l ,2,3-cd)pyrene'a"b'
200*
NSL
M£
2500
160
?(»(i
100 J
4-1111
84
4.7
52(iii
•>S .1
2000.1
4 1
.1
2 1
66 J
Naphthalene'3"1''
176
561
M£
1 Inn
520
f.sn
13(1(1
2"! Ill
36 J
7.4
21(1(1
4
15
170
Perylene(b'
NSL
NSL
M£
(J5U
¦
100U
2200
39
9.1
¦
98000 U
2000 I
38000 U
66 U
Phenanthrene'a"b'
204
1170
M£
l.tiinii
880
24(ni
100 J
1"
170
25
1
4
13
I1!
52
12
590
Pyrene'a"b'
195
1520
M£
I4i ii mi .1
880 J
100 J
1
410
23
24
7200.1
12
33
-•Jin i.l
480
Total PAH17 ND=1 /2RL
1610
22800
M£
82620
fil36
IS2f.ii
2755
124fo(i
2332
178.9
l3foMi
2 "2 5
92100
I3SMHI
2fiii()Siin
"1 si ll
3103
Total PAH34 ND=1 /2RL
1610
22800
.
l2'J32(i
*>561
:f.K.n
4015
K.I5MI
3612
305.5
2ii"4ini
3*>2 1
|| trim
IS-51111
34-SS(i(i
Wf.ln
6452
NOTES:
(a) Analytes included in Total 17 PAH calculations.
(b) Analytes included in Total 34 PAH calculations.
Bolded delected \ sillies evceed TF.C screening \ nine
Molded iind Sluided delected \ nines exceed I'KC screening value
Hg/kg = Microgram(s) per kilogram.
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown Area.
ND = Non-detect.
NSL = No Screening Level.
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
RL = Reporting limit.
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Qualifiers:
J = Compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
J + = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased
high.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
TEC value based onUSEPA Region 5 RCRA Ecological Screening Value (EPA 2003b).
Harbortown Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 2 of 12
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-5 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (feet):
HT 16-08
HT 16-08
HT 16-08
HT 16-09
HT16-09
HT 16-09
HT 16-09
HT16-10
HT16-10
HT16-11
HT16-11
HT16-11
HT16-11
HT16-12
HT16-08-0010
HT16-08-1030
HT16-08-1030-FD
HT16-09-SURF
HT16-09-0010
HT16-09-1030
HT16-09-1030-FD
HT16-10-0010
HT16-10-1030
HT16-11-SURF
HT16-11-0010
HT16-11-1015
HT16-11-1530
HT16-12-SURF
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/13/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/10/2016
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
6/14/2016
0-1
1-3
1-3
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
1-3
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
0-1
1-1.5
1.5-3
0-0.5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
1 -Methylnaphthalene
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
56
60
34
4300
650 J
36
35
220
16
1200 J
220000
300000
38000 U
79 J
2-Methylnaphthalene(a)
20.2*
NSL
M-g'kg
59
61
34
2100 J
520 J
43
39
180 J
14
620 J
290000
440000
38000 U
120 J
A.cenaphthene(a,(b'
6.71*
NSL
M-g'kg
61
69
34
8900
1900
41
54
200
11
2200
210000
350000
38000 U
120 J
Acenaphthy lene(a) (b)
5.87*
NSL
M-g'kg
4.1 J
3 J
1.2 J
990 J
450 J
4.5
12 J
73 J
1.6 J
460 J
11000 J
14000 J
38000 U
120 J
Anthracene'a"b'
57.2
845
M-g'kg
32
33
17
45iHi
:3imi
19
40
1000
12
2NMM
I^MMMM
2MMMMM
38000 U
160
Benzo(a)anthracene(a,(b'
108
1050
M-g'kg
26
22
10
4:imi
29 J
97 J
1000
8.6
f»4un
N4IIIMI
'Willi Ml
38000 U
500
Benzo( a jpyr ene(a,(b'
150
1450
M-g'kg
27
18
8.1
SIHHI
.Ml HI
25 J
95 J
850
10
ftJMM
38000 U
530
Benzo(b)fluoranthene'a"b'
10400*
NSL
M-g'kg
18
15
8.4
2700
18
64
590
7.9
1
38000 U
590
Benzo(e )pyrene(b)
150
1450
M-g'kg
19
14
8.1
4"! Ml
2IIHI
18
58
490
9.2
3imiii
4mmm
61
91
1 "mm
34
II
450
Pyrene'a"b'
195
1520
Mg/kg
92
81
41
22IMIU
•JNMM
61 J
190 J
:?mm.i
33
1200 J
Total PAH17 ND=1/2RL
1610
22800
Mg/kg
647.5
604.1
320.25
1 ]MM(JM
4S5(|M
520.7
1147
15433
257.8
S3,J|m
:i4M.MM
3:353i"i
.*4:111111
6940
Total PAID4 ND=1/2RL
1610
22800
Mg/kg
1766.5
1648.9
1110.55
1S4(>(>H
"f.S4n
1447.7
2648
21143
967.8
i:m?«>m
3I>1IMIM
£2 ftii.ii m
(i(i5MMM
10380
NOTES:
(a) Analytes included in Total 17 PAH calculations.
(b) Analytes included in Total 34 PAH calculations.
Bolded delected \ sillies evceed TEC screening \ nine
Molded mid Shnded delected Millies exceed I'KC screening \ silue
Hg/kg = Microgram(s) per kilogram.
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown Area.
ND =Non-detect.
NSL = No Screening Level.
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
RL = Reporting limit.
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Qualifiers:
J = Compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
J + = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased
high.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
TEC value based on USEPA Region 5 RCRA Ecological Screening Value (EPA 2003b).
Harbortown Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan Page 3 of 12
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-5 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (feet):
HT16-12
HT16-12
HT16-12
HT16-12
HT16-13
HT16-13
HT16-13
HT16-13
HT16-13
HT16-14
HT16-14
HT16-14
HT16-15
HT16-15
HT16-12-0010
HT16-12-1020
HT 16-12-2035
HT16-12-3550
HT16-13-SURF
HT16-13-0010
HT16-13-1030
HT16-13-1030-FD
HT16-13-3050
HT16-14-SURF
HT16-14-0010
HT16-14-1030
HT16-15-SURF
HT16-15-0010
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/13/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/13/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/13/2016
6/14/2016
0-1
1-2
2-3.5
3.5-5
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
1-3
3-5
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
0-1
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
1 -Methylnaphthalene
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
120000
19000
1300
67
85 J
14000
17000
14000
590
100 J
6000
99
63 J
3100
2-Methylnaphthalene(a)
20.2*
NSL
Mg/kg
180000
27000
2000
95
78 J
10000
17000
14000
810
98 J
5800
100
73 J
1400 J
Acenaphthene(a) (b)
6.71*
NSL
Mg/kg
130000
7400
1300
41
430
28000
26000
18000
640
630
14000
180
110
9200
Acenaphthylene(a,(b'
5.87*
NSL
Mg'kg
35000 J
9900
520 J
20 J
150 J
1600 J
1600 J
1600 J
25 J
700
630 J
9.5 J
58 J
690 J
Anthracene'a"b'
57.2
845
Mg'kg
"IMMMI
IS
15HII
35
41 HI
| "IMMI
I >ihmi
I Iiiiiii
420
SMI
>*)iiii
67
180
(iSllll
Benzo( a janthr acene(a,(b'
108
1050
Mg'kg
4.>llllll
II
I Shu
34
I4IHI
| >111111
14111111
12(i(i(i
210
431111
44i hi
60
580
>(.1111
Benzo(a)pyrene(a,(b'
150
1450
Mg'kg
—(Ml
Htllll
31
IMMI
I4IMMI
12IMMI
•j^iiii
160
541 III
3300
53
670
531111
Benzo(b)fluoranthene'a''b'
10400*
NSL
Mg'kg
¦
20
90 J
1700 J
28
630
Benzo(e )pyrene(b)
150
1450
Mg'kg
43WI
•j.in
20
•JMI
"•>1111
"IMMI
>"1111
30 U
.>.>1111
1900U
31
490
3liiii
Benzo(g,h,i )perylene(a,(b'
170*
NSL
Mg'kg
35000 J
3600 J
560
20 U
71U
5"UU
4SUU J
35UU
63 J
2400
1200 J
33
390
2100
Benzo(k)fluoranthene'a"b'
240*
NSL
Mg'kg
24000 J
5700
1200
20
1100
11000
9200
7400
140
3400
2400
34
620
3900
CI Chryseiies(b)
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
35000 U
8100 J
1200 J
32 J
640 J
9800 J
10000 J
9700 J
180 J
2800 J
2800 J
49 J
390 J
4500 J
CI Fluorenes|b)
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
35000 U
6200 J
590 J
20 U
290 U
4700 U
5100 J
4400 J
140 J
540 U
2500 J
33 J
87 U
2500 J
CI -Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes(b)
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
120000 J
28000 J
3600 J
110 J
2200 J
34000 J
35000 J
31000 J
590 J
8600 J
12000 J
160 J
830 J
14000 J
CI -Naphthalenes'1''
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
200000 J
32000 J
2200 J
110 J
290 U
16000 J
24000 J
19000 J
960 J
540 U
8200 J
140 J
93 J
2800 J
CI -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b'
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
120000 J
31000 J
2900 J
110 J
1000 J
28000 J
32000 J
30000 J
730 J
2100 J
14000 J
190 J
390 J
14000 J
C2 Chrysenes|b)
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
35000 U
3600 U
520 U
21 J
290 J
4700 U
5700 J
5500 J
130 U
1200 J
1900 U
32 J
210 J
2400 J
C2 Fluorenes|b)
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
35000 U
4600 J
520 U
22 J
290 U
4700 U
5100 U
3700 J
130 U
540 U
1900 U
25 J
87 U
1500 J
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
44000 J
9900 J
1400 J
68 J
900 J
12000 J
12000 J
12000 J
230 J
3400 J
3400 J
69 J
430 J
5500 J
C2-Naphthalenes'1''
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
260000 J
46000 J
3600 J
170 J
540 J
42000 J
54000 J
50000 J
1700 J
730 J
21000 J
310 J
260 J
22000 J
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
48000 J
15000 J
1500 J
84 J
560 J
11000 J
18000 J
19000 J
340 J
1500 J
3700 J
97 J
290 J
6300 J
C3 Chrysenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
35000 U
3600 U
520 U
20 U
290 U
4700 U
5100 U
3200 J
130 U
540 U
1900 U
26 J
130 J
1500 U
C3 Fluorenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
35000 U
3600 U
520 U
21 J
290 U
4700 U
5100 U
4600 J
130 U
540 U
1900 U
22 J
90 J
1500 U
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
35000 U
3600 U
520 U
38 J
290 U
4700 U
5100 U
5700 J
130 U
540 U
1900 U
40 J
180 J
1800 J
C3 -N aphthalenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
100000 J
23000 J
1900 J
200 J
510 J
23000 J
32000 J
32000 J
820 J
660 J
9100 J
240 J
260 J
12000 J
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
35000 J
10000 J
1400 J
97 J
520 J
10000 J
22000 J
23000 J
350 J
1300 J
3100 J
79 J
350 J
4800 J
C4 Chrysenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
35000 U
3600 U
520 U
20 U
290 U
4700 U
5100 U
2900 U
130 U
540 U
1900 U
19 U
87 U
1500 U
C4-Naphthalenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
35000 U
4800 J
530 J
140 J
290 U
4700 U
8200 J
8900 J
220 J
540 U
1900 U
120 J
110 J
2700 J
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
35000 U
3600 U
970 J
66 J
290 U
4700 U
11000 J
13000 J
180 J
550 J
1900 U
52 J
190 J
2000 J
Chrysene'a"b'
166
1290
Mg/kg
| 1IMMI
I 'jiiii
49
1500
I (iiiiiii
I >111111
(.>111111
230
4MIII
41(1(1
65
780
(..>1111
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene'a"b'
33
NSL
Mg/kg
.>>1111 .1
*).>ii .1
:iu.i
4.4 J
210 J
1 >imi.I
I'iiii.I
I3IIII .1
16 J
MM
43(i .1
6.5 J
120
(,>n.l
Fluoranthene(a) (b)
423
2230
Mg/kg
INlMMI
33mm
60
2000
2MMIII
2 MM HI
2 1 (KMI
400
3 *11111
"5i 111
97
990
S'Jllll
Fluorene'a"b'
77.4
536
Mg/kg
">111111
| "IMMI
| .>imi
43
300
141 ii mi
I4IIIIII
| IMMMI
390
>5ii
—'Jiiii
95
95
Mini
Indeno(l ,2,3-cd)pyrene'a"b'
200*
NSL
Mg/kg
.>(.1111 .1
f.Sn
20 J
640
4«>llll
44IHI.I
341 HI
50 J
18 J
380
IS1111
Naphthalene'3"1''
176
561
Mg/kg
2 >111II III
4MIIIII
210
110 J
12111111
IMMMI
| IIIIIII
•>|n
ISll.l
If.
250
98
2 Km
Perylene(b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
20 U
290
130 U
980
19 U
160
Phenanthrene'a"b'
204
1170
Mg/kg
I'JIMMMI
>>111111
>|llll
120
I4IMI
>11111111
42(ni(i
.>|llllll
900
2(i(i(i
24111111
250
490
If.
Pyrene'a"b'
195
1520
Mg/kg
I4IMMMI .1
3MIIIII .1
4*>imi .1
110 J
3 Inn
4'Jiiiiii
4>iiiiu
,>MHIII
710
Si 11111
I >111111
180
1200
Total PAH17 ND=1 /2RL
1610
22800
1
1372500
2SK.3II
32~|n
922.4
U.22S
2S2*>iiii
2 —(I-(Ml
6164
42858
1152 Mi
1526
7464
•J4S4H
Total PAH34 ND=1 /2RL
1610
22800
1
22r>Sllllll
4"S43n
>.>>')( 1
2070.4
:4s:n
4"5"5n
53ii45n
4MISIIII
12019
fiS3~u
| (>44l 11
3051
11764.5
NOTES:
(a) Analytes included in Total 17 PAH calculations.
(b) Analytes included in Total 34 PAH calculations.
Bolded delected \ sillies evceed TEC screening \ nine
folded iind Sluidcd delected \ nines exceed I'KC screening value
Hg/kg = Microgram(s) per kilogram.
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown Area.
ND = Non-detect.
NSL =No Screening Level.
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
RL = Reporting limit.
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Qualifiers:
J = Compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
J + = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased
high.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
TEC value based onUSEPA Region 5 RCRA Ecological Screening Value (EPA 2003b).
Harbortown Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 4 of 12
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-5 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (feet):
HT16-15
HT16-16
HT16-16
HT16-16
HT16-16
HT16-16
HT16-16
HT16-17
HT16-17
HT16-17
HT16-17
HT16-17
HT16-18
HT16-18
HT16-15-1030
HT16-16-SURF
HT16-16-0010
HT16-16-1030
HT16-16-1030-FD
HT16-16-3055
HT16-16-5570
HT16-17-SURF
HT16-17-SURF-FD
HT16-17-0015
HT16-17-1530
HT16-17-3050
HT16-18-SURF
HT16-18B-0010
6/14/2016
6/10/2016
6/12/2016
6/12/2016
6/12/2016
6/12/2016
6/12/2016
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/15/2016
1-3
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
1-3
3-5.5
5.5-7
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-1.5
1.5-3
3-5
0-0.5
0-1
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
1 -Methylnaphthalene
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
20 J
83 J
460 J
2400
4200
510000
430
46 J
38 J
1800
7400
130
120
140
2-Methylnaphthalene(a)
20.2*
NSL
Mg/kg
14 J
57 J
1400 J
1300 J
4100 J
730000
620
46 J
41 J
310 J
9300
120
92
140 J
Acenaphthene(a) (b)
6.71*
NSL
Mg/kg
23 J
290
1300 J
5900
11000
630000
440
110
88 J
2100
8300
160
340
600
Acenaphthylene(a,(b'
5.87*
NSL
Mg'kg
26 U
38 J
380 J
490 J
1200 J
25000 J
390 U
44 J
37 J
130 J
500 J
26 J
81 J
140 J
Anthracene'a"b'
57.2
845
Mg'kg
20 J
250
2"nn
3-WI
S.>llll
2IIIMIIIII
390 J
140
140
I Mill
Si ii hi
140
230
370
Benzo( a janthr acene(a,(b'
108
1050
Mg'kg
11 J
320
fill III
5|llll
II
I ^iiiiiiu
390 J
570
450
Mini
S^llll
240
200
440
Benzo(a)pyrene(a,(b'
150
1450
Mg'kg
9.9 J
300
4SIMI
4MIII
II
11 iiiiiiii
75 J
640
520
1100
-SI III
260
150
390
Benzo(b)fluoranthene'a''b'
10400*
NSL
Mg'kg
9.9 J
190
390 U
690
580
860
190
160
260
Benzo(e )pyrene(b)
150
1450
Mg'kg
26 U
200
2 Sim
2'XMI
foiin
f~ni hi
390 U
500
410
680
4m iii
160
100
240
Benzo(g,h,i )perylene(a,(b'
170*
NSL
Mg'kg
17 J
160
:ouu
4-UU
33UUU J
390 U
470
350
460
44UU J
130
81 U
140 J
Benzo(k)fluoranthene'a"b'
240*
NSL
Mg'kg
6.1 J
230
3600
3700
7600
79000
390 U
700
510
950
6500
180
130
350
CI Chryseiies(b)
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
26 U
180 J
1800 J
2300 J
4800 J
100000 J
390 U
310 J
250 J
610 J
4700 J
160 J
82 J
210 J
CI Fluorenes|b)
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
26 U
84 U
1400U
1300U
4100 U
97000 J
390 U
89 U
89 U
380 U
4400 U
40 J
81 U
140U
CI -Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes(b)
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
47 J
620 J
9300 J
9700 J
23000 J
500000 J
390 U
660 J
630 J
2700 J
14000 J
400 J
290 J
970 J
CI -Naphthalenes'1''
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
26 U
93 J
1400U
2200 J
4100 U
860000 J
740 J
89 U
89 U
1400 J
12000 J
180 J
140 J
170 J
CI -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b'
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
63 J
530 J
4700 J
6400 J
15000 J
460000 J
390 J
320 J
260 J
2600 J
11000 J
290 J
350 J
620 J
C2 Chrysenes|b)
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
29 J
120 J
1400U
1300U
4100 U
53000 U
390 U
130 J
160 J
410 J
4400 U
120 J
81 U
140U
C2 Fluorenes|b)
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
26 U
84 U
1400U
1300U
4100 U
53000 U
390 U
89 U
89 U
380 U
4400 U
40 U
81 U
140U
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
43 J
240 J
2300 J
3300 J
6300 J
140000 J
390 U
260 J
240 J
880 J
4700 J
160 J
140 J
290 J
C2-Naphthalenes'1''
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
110 J
490 J
1700 J
9000 J
20000 J
1300000 J
950 J
210 J
200 J
3800 J
16000 J
370 J
710 J
790 J
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
61 J
320 J
1500 J
3300 J
6000 J
150000 J
390 U
210 J
180 J
1000 J
4400 U
160 J
200 J
320 J
C3 Chrysenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
29 J
84 U
1400U
1300U
4100 U
53000 U
390 U
100 J
100 J
380 U
4400 U
52 J
81 U
140U
C3 Fluorenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
26 U
84 U
1400U
1300U
4100 U
53000 U
390 U
89 U
89 U
380 U
4400 U
40 U
81 U
140U
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
36 J
99 J
1400U
1300U
4100 U
53000 U
390 U
120 J
130 J
380 U
4400 U
76 J
81 U
140U
C3 -N aphthalenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
190 J
510 J
1400 J
5800 J
11000 J
440000 J
390 U
260 J
230 J
2300 J
7400 J
280 J
490 J
670 J
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
100 J
290 J
1400U
3300 J
5200 J
71000 J
390 U
230 J
230 J
820 J
4400 U
240 J
220 J
320 J
C4 Chrysenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
26 U
84 U
1400U
1300U
4100 U
53000 U
390 U
89 U
89 U
380 U
4400 U
40 U
81 U
140U
C4-Naphthalenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
120 J
220 J
1400U
2200 J
4100 U
53000 U
390 U
120 J
110 J
490 J
4400 U
130 J
210 J
240 J
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
63 J
130 J
1400U
1900 J
4100 U
53000 U
390 U
120 J
140 J
380 U
5500 J
330 J
85 J
160 J
Chrysene'a"b'
166
1290
Mg/kg
24 J
350
52nn
55m i
1^IMHI
1 ^iiiiiiii
390 J
820
670
15(1(1
O^iiii
260
230
500
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene'a"b'
33
NSL
Mg/kg
26 U
50 J
4_ii-1
.1
I |(Ml .I
12(i(i(i
390 U
150
89
m.i
1 liin.l
36 J
33 J
47 J
Fluoranthene'"'(b)
423
2230
Mg/kg
20 J
680
S^iw
S.illll
| —(Mill
21 iiiiiiii
390 J
1200
870
:-iin
380
600
1100
Fluorene'a"b'
77.4
536
Mg/kg
14 J
170
I4HH.I
32""
~.>iiii
.>411111111
390 J
96
77 J
13(1(1
f.Mii
120
210
380
Indeno(l ,2,3-cd)pyrene'a"b'
200*
NSL
Mg/kg
3.6 J
140
I Mill
2IMMI
.4Mm .1
2SIMHI .1
390 U
460
340
44(1
44(1(1.1
110
85
160
Naphthalene'3"1''
176
561
Mg/kg
370
48 J
I4«MI .1
l.illll .1
4 Inn .1
Senium
52 J
48 J
3(1(1.1
210
150
160
Perylene(b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
26 U
84 U
390 U
170
130
¦
58
81 U
140 U
Phenanthrene'a"b'
204
1170
Mg/kg
48
750
N2IHI
| 2IIIMI
.>|iiiiu
ft-llllllll
530
520
430
4
400
890
1100
Pyrene'a"b'
195
1520
Mg/kg
39
930
| (till III
I (tillIII
yjiinii
4(>iiiiiiii
390 J
1300
1100
44(1(1
520
730 J
17i m.i
Total PAH17 ND=1 /2RL
1610
22800
Mg/kg
655.5
4953
Mo5n
"S4MI
1 "•j^wi
4~.>4111111
7275
8008
6340
:3-:n
1541(1(1
3482
4351.5
7977
Total PAH34 ND=1 /2RL
1610
22800
Mg/kg
1557.5
8851
*)5S5n
l.iii-m
2S(»')im
S251iiiin
11660
11524.5
9551.5
4155(1
6392
7420
13037
NOTES:
(a) Analytes included in Total 17 PAH calculations.
(b) Analytes included in Total 34 PAH calculations.
Bolded delected \ sillies evceed TEC screening \ nine
folded iind Sluided delected \ allies exceed I'KC screening value
Hg/kg = Microgram(s) per kilogram.
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown Area.
ND = Non-detect.
NSL =No Screening Level.
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
RL = Reporting limit.
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Qualifiers:
J = Compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
J + = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased
high.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
TEC value based onUSEPA Region 5 RCRA Ecological Screening Value (EPA 2003b).
Harbortown Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan Page 5 of 12
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-5 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (feet):
HT16-18
HT16-18
HT16-18
HT16-18
HT16-18
HT16-18
HT16-18
HT16-19
HT16-19
HT16-19
HT16-19
HT16-19
HT16-20
HT 16-20
HT16-18B-1030
HT16-18B-3050
HT16-18B-3050-FD
HT16-18B-5070
HT16-18C-0010
HT16-18C-1025
HT16-18C-2540
HT16-19-SURF
HT16-19-0010
HT16-19-1030
HT16-19-3050
HT16-19-5070
HT16-20-SURF
HT16-20-0010
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/13/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/13/2016
6/14/2016
1-3
3-5
3-5
5-7
0-1
1-2.5
2.5-4
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-5
5-7
0-0.5
0-1
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
1 -Methylnaphthalene
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
10000
280000
190000
370
870
200000
300
17 J
720
5100
21000
17
280 J
190
2-Methylnaphthalene(a)
20.2*
NSL
M-g'kg
8300
400000 J
230000 J
520
620 J
290000
440
20 J
500 J
6000
30000
19
270 J
220
A.cenaphthene(a,(b'
6.71*
NSL
M-g'kg
13000
360000
230000
420
2300
250000
360
26 J
990
6500
27000
12
870
550
Acenaphthy lene(a) (b)
5.87*
NSL
M-g'kg
2300 J
12000 J
47000 J
14 J
330 J
8800 J
14 J
16 J
310 J
1300 J
3800 J
1.4 J
300 J
89 J
Anthracene'a"b'
57.2
845
M-g'kg
•rim
I4i ii ii hi
160
24i hi
Iiiiiiii hi
120
53
I5iiii
-(.mi
.>1 iiiiii
14
I3IHI
4fiH
Benzo(a)anthracene(a,(b'
108
1050
[ig/ka
13000
*r
Mm hi
140 J
.Wiiiu
(.fin mi
84
200
2 21 ii i
•Mini
.><111111
13
3SIHI
1 Inn
Benzo( a jpyr ene(a,(b'
150
1450
M*
II
"
71 J
.>(.1111
4SOOO
63
230
2 21 ii i
"
12
3SIHI
940
Benzo(b)fluoranthene'a"b'
10400*
NSL
M*
(ruu
1
1
45 J
19000 J
38 J
250
8.7
840
Benzo(e )pyrene(b)
150
1450
M*
6500
140 U
21 mi
39000 U
39 U
190
I5i in
4 1 i ii i
1
9.6
24)hi
650
Benzo(g,h,iJperylene(a,(b'
170*
NSL
M-g'kg
3700
22000 J
47000 U
140 U
1600
15000 J
31 J
170
1200
2600
11000
20
2100
550
Benzo(k)fluoranthene'a''b'
240*
NSL
M-g'kg
8700
53000
37000 J
51 J
2400
34000 J
40
250
2100
5300
21000
7.1
3000
920
CI Chrysenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
9300 J
71000 J
47000 U
140U
1600 J
52000 J
84 J
110 J
1900 J
9100 J
28000 J
22 J
1900 J
680 J
CI Fluorenes|b)
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
2300 U
58000 J
47000U
140 U
620 U
44000 J
65 J
32 U
1000 J
3100 J
11000 J
7.7 J
570 U
230 J
CI -Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes(b)
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
29000 J
280000 J
200000 J
140 U
6800 J
190000 J
310 J
220 J
4700 J
28000 J
87000 J
43 J
5400 J
1600 J
CI -Naphthalenes'1''
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
13000 J
470000 J
280000 J
370 J
830 J
340000 J
500 J
32 U
870 J
7600 J
35000 J
24 J
570 U
280 J
CI -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes^'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
24000 J
280000 J
210000 J
140 J
4100 J
220000 J
330 J
98 J
5200 J
24000 J
78000 J
53 J
2800 J
1200 J
C2 Chryseiies(b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
7500 J
46000 U
47000U
140 U
670 J
39000 U
42 J
75 J
1200 J
6000 J
19000 J
25 J
1000 J
260 J
C2 Fluorenes|b)
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
3100 J
46000 U
47000U
140 U
620 U
39000 U
39 U
32 U
2200 J
3900 J
8700 J
13 J
570 U
230 J
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
13000 J
88000 J
54000 J
140 U
2300 J
67000 J
110 J
140 J
2700 J
12000 J
37000 J
39 J
2200 J
760 J
C 2-N aphthalene s(b)
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
37000 J
710000 J
470000 J
150 J
4400 J
540000 J
790 J
81 J
9400 J
28000 J
99000 J
76 J
1400 J
1600 J
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes'1''
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
15000 J
96000 J
70000 J
140 U
2400 J
73000 J
150 J
70 J
5400 J
17000 J
42000 J
51 J
1700 J
700 J
C3 Chrysenes|b)
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
3200 J
46000 U
47000U
140 U
620 U
39000 U
39 U
51 J
910 J
3200 J
9700 J
24 J
570 U
200 J
C3 Fluorenes(b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
3500 J
46000 U
47000U
140 U
620 U
39000 U
39 U
32 U
2300 J
3500 J
6200 J
16 J
570 U
240 J
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
7300 J
46000 U
47000U
140 U
620 U
39000 U
41 J
55 J
1500 J
5500 J
14000 J
30 J
690 J
350 J
C3-Naphthalenes(b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
24000 J
240000 J
190000 J
140 U
3700 J
200000 J
370 J
100 J
16000 J
25000 J
67000 J
130 J
1300 J
1800 J
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes'1''
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
20000 J
47000 J
47000U
140 U
2000 J
39000 U
120 J
110 J
8100 J
20000 J
45000 J
89 J
1500 J
860 J
C4 Chrysenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
2300 U
46000 U
47000U
140 U
620 U
39000 U
39 U
32 U
700 U
1600U
5900 U
11 J
570 U
180U
C4-Naphthalenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
7000 J
46000 U
47000U
140 U
1900 J
39000 U
140 J
45 J
8300 J
7900 J
17000 J
83 J
570 U
660 J
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes'1''
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
9600 J
46000 U
47000U
140 U
1200 J
39000 U
56 J
61 J
4900 J
11000 J
22000 J
41 J
1000 J
520 J
Chrysene'a"b'
166
1290
Mg/kg
14IIIHI
Will III
~2iiiiii
140 J
3SIIII
100
310
2*iiiii
1 iiiiiiii
.tSllllll
22
43IIH
I3IIH
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene'a"b'
33
NSL
Mg/kg
IfilHI .1
SMii.l
45imi .1
11 J
4i in .1
4f.nn -1
8.6 J
59
3*iii.l
•rii.i
34)1)1.1
1.9 J
"5n
190
Fluoranthene'a"b'
423
2230
Mg/kg
22(HIII
1 ^iiiiiiu
11 iiiiiiii
160
(,2iin
1
140
350
44i hi
1 fin hi
5r.iiini
21
~ Mm
1800
Fluorene'a"b'
77.4
536
Mg/kg
tt|IHI
2 hi ii ii hi
I4i ii ii hi
220
I3IHI
14
210
29 J
•ir.ii
M.I Ml
2 mm hi
10
~211
370
[ndeno(l ,2,3-cd)pyrene'a"b'
200*
NSL
Mg/kg
441 Ml
I *>iiiiii . 1
4~iiiiii .1
20 J
I3IHI
12 1
19 J
180
1 Inn
2r.uu
1 iiiiiiii
4.1
2200
560
Naphthalene'3"1''
176
561
Mg/kg
11IIIIII1
44IIIHIII.I
25IMIIIU .1
sill
f.2ii.1
550
25 J
|*iii.l
1 Iiiii . 1
Mil ii hi
15
360 J
180
Perylene'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
140 L
650
39000 U
39 U
61
7.9
810
220
Phenanthrene'"'(b'
204
1170
Mg/kg
2 *11II III
42IMMIII
.>2iniiiii
460
Mini
440
160
41 ii ill
|*iiiiiii
Si ii ii hi
38
.>~iiu
Kiiiu
Pyrene'a"b'
195
1520
Mg/kg
.><111111 .1
.iiiiiiiiiii
24IHIIHI .1
280
'I'liiii
300
430
iiini
3592
4Sf.-n
I*i5ii4iiu
2957.6
2758
32'i4n
|.>IIS~II
5322IHI
259.2
4f»—ii
I4I(>*1
Total PAID4 ND=1/2RL
1610
22800
Mg/kg
4ii~>4*iSiiiin
4782
SI *l5n
351441 in
5591.6
4090
lii~ii2n
32"S~ii
1II*1S~mi
966.4
(.*i"ii<
25*i(.*i
NOTES:
(a) Analytes included in Total 17 PAH calculations.
(b) Analytes included in Total 34 PAH calculations.
Bolded (k'U'cii'ri \ sillies eva-ed TF.C scm-niii" \ sillie
Molded nnd Sluided delected values evceed I'KC screening \ nine
Hg/kg = Microgram(s) per kilogram.
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown Area.
ND =Non-detect.
NSL = No Screening Level.
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
RL = Reporting limit.
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Qualifiers:
J = Compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
J + = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased
high.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
TEC value based on USEPA Region 5 RCRA Ecological Screening Value (EPA 2003b).
Harbortown Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 6 of 12
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-5 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (feet):
HT 16-20
HT 16-20
HT16-21
HT16-21
HT 16-21
HT 16-21
HT 16-22
HT 16-22
HT 16-22
HT16-23
HT 16-23
HT16-23
HT 16-23
HT 16-23
HT16-20-1035
HT16-20-3550
HT16-21-SURF
HT16-21 -SURF-FD
HT16-21 -0010
HT16-21-1030
HT16-22-SURF
HT16-22-0010
HT16-22-1030
HT16-23-SURF
HT16-23-0005
HT 16-23-0515
HT16-23-1535
HT16-23-90100
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
6/10/2016
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
6/9/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
1-3.5
3.5-5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
0-0.5
0.5-1.5
1.5-3.5
9-10
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
1 -Methylnaphthalene
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
9700
140
380 J
580 J
160 J
10
270 J
7.5
7.9
50 J
320000
66000
1500
88
2-Methylnaphthalene(a)
20.2*
NSL
M-g'kg
13000
200
300 J
540 J
400 J
9.6
230 J
5.8
7.9
50 J
450000
94000
2200
130
A.cenaphthene(a,(b'
6.71*
NSL
M-g'kg
12000
160
850 J
1500 J
420
4 J
1200 J
3.9 U
4 J
260 J
750000
180000 J
3600
160
Acenaphthy lene(a) (b)
5.87*
NSL
M-g'kg
1300 .T
9.5 J
1500U
2200 U
160 J
1.1 J
560 J
0.48 J
0.83 J
70 J
31000 J
7100 J
160 J
7.3 J
Anthracene'a"b'
57.2
845
1
9900
99
1 win
620
5.3
I Smm
3.9
4.8
5ftll
"ill III
1 2(mi
53
Benzo(a)anthracene(a,(b'
108
1050
1
9600
85
4'JMM
I4mi
4 J
follll
4.4
4 J
1600
f4iiiiii
1 Inn
45
Benzo( a jpyr ene(a,(b'
150
1450
1
ssoo
70
4~ihi
IfiMM
4 U
"Mil
3.9 U
4 U
15mm
I2o0
45
Benzo(b)fluoranthene'a"b'
10400*
NSL
1
50
830
6.3
6.9
7.1
10 J
23 J
Benzo(e )pyrene(b)
150
1450
1
5|llll
44
I'JIHI
3
880
4 U
45mm
3.9 U
4 U
31
30 U
29
Benzo(g,h,iJperylene(a,(b'
170*
NSL
M-g'kg
3500
45
15UU
21UU J
550
4 U
42UU
3.9 U
4 U
SOU
98UUU
:?uuu
520 J
30
Benzo(k)fluoranthene'a''b'
240*
NSL
M-g'kg
6200
55
2400
4400
1100
1.9
5400
2.6 J
0.68 J
1400
150000
37000
790
30
CI Chrysenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
6800 J
78 J
1500U
2200 U
620 J
17 J
2400 J
10 J
15 J
690 J
76000 U
17000 J
790 U
26 U
CI Fluorenes|b)
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
3000 J
43 J
1500U
2200 U
400 U
5.6 J
1500U
4.7 J
5.7 J
480 U
76000 U
13000 J
790 U
26 U
CI -Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes(b)
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
24000 J
230 J
3400 J
6000 J
2600 J
26 J
9900 J
25 J
24 J
1300 J
450000 J
110000 J
2200 J
100 J
CI -Naphthalenes'1''
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
16000 J
240 J
1500U
2200 U
400 U
14 J
1500U
9.1 J
11 J
480 U
560000 J
120000 J
2500 J
150 J
CI -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes^'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
18000 J
250 J
2200 J
3800 J
1300 J
35 J
4700 J
23 J
32 J
730 J
270000 J
67000 J
1300 J
87 J
C2 Chrysenes|b)
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
3100 J
48 J
1500U
2200 U
400 U
26 J
1600 J
13 J
32 J
480 U
76000 U
7300 U
790 U
26 U
C2 Fluorenes|b)
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
2400 J
37 J
1500U
2200 U
400 U
12 J
1500U
7.2 J
11 J
480 U
76000 U
7300 U
790 U
26 U
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
7400 J
98 J
1500U
2200 U
600 J
36 J
3200 J
24 J
32 J
670 J
79000 J
19000 J
790 U
51 J
C 2-N aphthalene s(b)
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
33000 J
470 J
1500U
2200 U
720 J
53 J
1500U
28 J
41 J
480 U
620000 J
120000 J
2800 J
180 J
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes'1''
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
10000 J
140 J
1500U
2200 U
510 J
46 J
2300 J
23 J
41 J
480 U
76000 U
15000 J
790 U
55 J
C3 Chryseiies(b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
1800 U
32 J
1500U
2200 U
400 U
31 J
1500U
11 J
26 J
480 U
76000 U
7300 U
790 U
26 U
C3 Fluorenes(b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
2100 J
32 J
1500U
2200 U
400 U
15 J
1500U
7.5 J
13 J
480 U
76000 U
7300 U
790 U
26 U
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
2900 J
53 J
1500U
2200 U
400 U
34 J
1500U
17 J
25 J
480 U
76000 U
7300 U
790 U
27 J
C3-Naphthalenes(b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
21000 J
320 J
1500U
2200 U
520 J
130 J
1500 J
56 J
100 J
480 U
110000 J
25000 J
790 U
150 J
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes'1''
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
13000 J
200 J
1500U
2200 U
400 U
100 J
1500U
50 J
84 J
480 U
76000 U
7300 U
790 U
66 J
C4 Chrysenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
1800 U
20 U
1500U
2200 U
400 U
12 J
1500U
5.7 J
12 J
480 U
76000 U
7300 U
790 U
26 U
C4-Naphthalenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
4900 J
150 J
1500U
2200 U
400 U
100 J
1500U
46 J
93 J
480 U
76000U
7300 U
790 U
110 J
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes'1''
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
7000 J
110 J
1500U
2200 U
400 U
40 J
1500 U
23 J
41 J
480 U
76000U
7300 U
790 U
40 J
Chrysene'a"b'
166
1290
Mg/kg
11000
98
3
4SMM
1300
14
fi4im
9.1
14
1 "mm
fMmi
1100
52
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene'a"b'
33
NSL
1 I Tin .7
9.9 J
4MI -1
foil. 1
180 J
2
I | MM .1
1.3 J
1.1 J
31".1
IS
4f>"".l
% .T
4.5 J
Fluoranthene'a"b'
423
2230
Ifllllll
170
foiin
•JKllll
2000
4.8
| |MMM
5.7
5.3
3f.nn
Oliiiiii
| Willi
83
Fluorene'a"b'
77.4
536
8000
110
I3IHI.I
400 J
4 J
NSll.l
3.9 J
4 J
23"-1
Nlllllll
If.iin
75
[ndeno(l ,2,3-cd)pyrene'a"b'
200*
NSL
3400
27
I3IHI.I
ISllll .1
590
4 U
3400
3.9 U
4 U
880
.Mil i.l
16 J
Naphthalene'3"1''
176
561
7800
160
f.ln.l
1
400 J
7.2
370 J
6.7
8.4
I*'
f ,4imi
370
Perylene'b'
NSL
NSL
20
400 U
8.2
1500
5.3
7.8
¦
76000 U
7800
26 U
Phenanthrene 'a'(b'
204
1170
2 | (Mill
280
Mnn
| IMMMI
|(JMM
17
ftfllll
13
15
w.
4Siiii
200
Pyrene'a"b'
195
1520
2ftMIIII
270
"Mm
| 2IMMI
.t(JMM
16
Ifllllll
14
16
Mini
42(iii
160
Total PAH17 ND=1/2RL
1610
22800
WollMI
1898.4
432"n
fi~fi~n
|~"ll
103.2
~fif>4H
85.58
99.11
I'J5|m
1422-iin
31 "ft
1483.8
Total PAID4 ND=1/2RL
1610
22800
322200
4152.4
M-:n
(>fi43n
2ft "mm
766.4
1123 in
429.23
682.71
:f»54n
ISS3-MII
43SSf,
2424.8
NOTES:
(a) Analytes included in Total 17 PAH calculations.
(b) Analytes included in Total 34 PAH calculations.
Bolded delecled \ sillies evceed TEC screening \ sillie
Molded mid Sluided delected Millies exceed I'KC screening \ siItie
Hg/kg = Microgram(s) per kilogram.
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown Area.
ND =Non-detect.
NSL = No Screening Level.
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
RL = Reporting limit.
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Qualifiers:
J = Compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
J + = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased
high.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
TEC value based on USEPA Region 5 RCRA Ecological Screening Value (EPA 2003b).
Harbortown Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 7 of 12
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-5 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (feet):
HT 16-23
HT 16-23
HT16-23
HT 16-24
HT16-24
HT 16-24
HT 16-25
HT 16-25
HT16-25
HT 16-25
HT 16-26
HT16-26
HT 16-26
HT16-23-100110-DS
HT16-23-110130-DS
HT16-23-150160
HT16-24-SURF
HT16-24-0010
HT16-24-1030
HT16-25-SURF
HT16-25-SURF-FD
HT16-25-0010
HT16-25-1030
HT16-26-SURF
HT16-26-0010
HT16-26-1030
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/9/2016
6/12/2016
6/12/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
6/10/2016
6/12/2016
6/12/2016
10-11
11-13
15-16
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
1 -Methylnaphthalene
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
85000
230
160
100 J
15
17
44 J
50 J
66 J
8.1
19 J
22
16
2-Methylnaphthalene(a)
20.2*
NSL
Mg/kg
120000
340
230
51 J
22
21
51 J
59 J
170 J
8.7
21 J
28
18
Acenaphthene(a) (b)
6.71*
NSL
Mg/kg
170000
470
270
420
9.6
7
160
160
250
5.3
24 J
16
8.7
Acenaphthylene(a,(b'
5.87*
NSL
Mg'kg
7000 J
20 J
10 J
43 J
0.68 J
0.89 J
33 J
39 J
68 J
0.98 J
13 J
1.2 J
0.99 J
Anthracene'a"b'
57.2
845
Mg'kg
(i2"""
210
98 J
240
5.8
7.3
140
150
340
6.1
39 J
11
8.3
Benzo( a janthr acene(a,(b'
108
1050
Mg'kg
? |IHHI
140
98 J
480
3.7 J
3.9 J
520
640
840
10
190
8.2
6.4
Benzo(a)pyrene(a,(b'
150
1450
Mg'kg
57"""
160
68 J
490
2.4 J
4.2
640
710
760
3.9 U
250
7.6
5.6
Benzo(b)fluoranthene'a''b'
10400*
NSL
Mg'kg
24000 J
75 J
32 J
340
3.9
5.3
800
820
620
14
290
8.5
8
Benzo(e )pyrene(b)
150
1450
Mg'kg
39000 U
140 U
98 U
320
4.1
7
550
580
480
3.9 U
230
8.6
8.6
Benzo(g,h,i )perylene(a,(b'
170*
NSL
Mg'kg
31000 J
85 J
39 J
270
6
12
550
580
300
3.9 U
240
13
15
Benzo(k)fluoranthene'a"b'
240*
NSL
Mg'kg
36000 J
95 J
98 J
320
3.7 U
3.9 U
650
710
720
8.4
300
5.1
5
CI Chryseiies(b)
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
39000 U
140 U
98 U
220 J
9.7 J
17 J
250 J
370 J
440 J
18 J
100 J
15 J
15 J
CI Fluorenes|b)
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
39000 U
140 U
98 U
140U
4.5 J
7 J
140U
150U
170U
3.9 U
70 U
7.2 J
6.7 J
CI -Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes(b)
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
91000 J
250 J
150 J
740 J
21 J
32 J
730 J
800 J
1200 J
25 J
300 J
38 J
32 J
CI -Naphthalenes'1''
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
140000 J
390 J
260 J
140U
26 J
26 J
140U
150U
170U
12 J
70 U
35 J
23 J
CI -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b'
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
63000 J
210 J
110 J
470 J
27 J
42 J
320 J
300 J
650 J
23 J
120 J
45 J
41 J
C2 Chrysenes|b)
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
39000 U
140 U
98 U
140U
11 J
13 J
220 J
260 J
280 J
23 J
80 J
16 J
17 J
C2 Fluorenes|b)
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
39000 U
140 U
98 U
140U
7.7 J
12 J
140U
150U
170U
6.2 J
70 U
11 J
12 J
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
39000 U
140 U
98 U
250 J
26 J
7.7 J
350 J
450 J
420 J
27 J
150 J
36 J
37 J
C2-Naphthalenes'1''
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
130000 J
350 J
270 J
310 J
50 J
69 J
230 J
280 J
280 J
26 J
75 J
65 J
64 J
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
39000 U
140 U
98 U
270 J
29 J
50 J
240 J
270 J
450 J
31 J
110 J
41 J
48 J
C3 Chrysenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
39000 U
140 U
98 U
140U
8.5 J
16 J
140 J
190 J
170 J
30 J
70 U
14 J
14 J
C3 Fluorenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
39000 U
140 U
98 U
140U
8.6 J
14 J
140U
150U
170U
9.1 J
70 U
10 J
10 J
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
39000 U
140 U
98 U
140U
17 J
31 J
170 J
210 J
200 J
25 J
73 J
24 J
19 J
C3 -N aphthalenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
39000 U
140 U
130 J
290 J
72 J
140 J
240 J
270 J
310 J
53 J
130 J
100 J
130 J
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
39000 U
140 U
98 U
160 J
44 J
69 J
270 J
370 J
410 J
58 J
110 J
61 J
69 J
C4 Chrysenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
39000 U
140 U
98 U
140U
3.7 U
3.9 U
140U
150U
170U
6.5 J
70 U
3.9 U
4 U
C4-Naphthalenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
39000 U
140 U
100 J
160 J
65 J
110 J
140U
150 J
170U
45 J
75 J
84 J
97 J
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
39000 U
140 U
98 U
140U
30 J
48 J
170 J
240 J
330 J
32 J
70 U
39 J
43 J
Chrysene'a"b'
166
1290
Mg/kg
140
98 J
470
9.6
15
690
830
850
18
310
19
17
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene'a"b'
33
NSL
7300.1
16 J
98 U
69 J
0.69 J
1.8 J
150
170
150 J
2.3 J
62 J
3.4 J
1.8 J
Fluoranthene'"'(b)
423
2230
290
110
1000
6.4
6.4
1100
1000
1800
15
500
15
11
Fluorene'a"b'
77.4
536
73000
200
110
200
5.4
5.7
150
150
310
5.1
30 J
10
7.4
Indeno(l ,2,3-cd)pyrene'a"b'
200*
NSL
22""" .1
60 J
22 J
220
1.2 J
1.9 J
500
520
420
5.3
220
3.9
3.7 J
Naphthalene'3"1''
176
561
.12IHHHI
| IHMI
880
56 J
44
36
72 J
70 J
170 J
17
32 J
39
26
Perylene(b'
NSL
NSL
140 U
98 U
140U
4.4
8.4
190
220
190
8.3
79
8
8.3
Phenanthrene'a"b'
204
1170
24""""
730
310
870
17
21
490
480
1100
19
180
33
27
Pyrene'a"b'
195
1520
2"""""
550
270
1400
16
19
1100
1300
IS""
22
480
32
22
Total PAH17 ND=1 /2RL
1610
22800
I54~3""
4581
2792
6939
156.22
170.34
7796
8388
10668
161.08
3181
253.9
191.89
Total PAH34 ND=1 /2RL
1610
22800
2 1243""
6421
4170
10458
558.57
831.69
11715
13004
16198
562.38
4814
825.65
814.49
NOTES:
(a) Analytes included in Total 17 PAH calculations.
(b) Analytes included in Total 34 PAH calculations.
Bolded delected \ sillies evceed TEC screening \ nine
folded iind Sluided delected \ allies exceed I'KC screening value
Hg/kg = Microgram(s) per kilogram.
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown Area.
ND = Non-detect.
NSL =No Screening Level.
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
RL = Reporting limit.
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Qualifiers:
J = Compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
J + = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased
high.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
TEC value based onUSEPA Region 5 RCRA Ecological Screening Value (EPA 2003b).
Harbortown Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 8 of 12
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-5 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (feet):
HT 16-27
HT 16-27
HT 16-27
HT 16-27
HT 16-27
HT16-28
HT 16-28
HT16-28
HT 16-28
HT 16-28
HT 16-29
HT 16-29
HT 16-29
HT16-29
HT16-27-SURF
HT16-27-0010
HT16-27-1020
HT16-27-2030
HT16-27-3040
HT16-28-SURF
HT16-28-0010
HT16-28-1020
HT16-28-6575
HT16-28-7590
HT16-29-SURF
HT16-29-1020
HT 16-29-2035
HT16-29-3550
6/9/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/14/2016
6/12/2016
6/12/2016
6/12/2016
6/12/2016
6/14/2016
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
0-0.5
0-1
1-2
2-3
3-4
0-0.5
0-1
1-2
6.5-7.5
7.5-9
0-0.5
1-2
2-3.5
3.5-5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
1 -Methylnaphthalene
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
38 J
86 J
240 J
160
44
18 J
78
32 J
97
2100 J
64 J
2600
9700
29
2-Methylnaphthalene(a)
20.2*
NSL
Mg/kg
49 J
580 U
1200 J
110
36
22 J
90
34 J
120
2800 J
430 J
2000 J
8800 J
20
Acenaphthene(a) (b)
6.71*
NSL
Mg/kg
130 J
940
1200
300
79
24 J
110
35 J
8.8 J
2700 J
430 J
4400
14000
32
Acenaphthylene(a,(b'
5.87*
NSL
Mg'kg
110 J
150 J
160 J
25 J
8.4 J
14 J
34 J
15 UJ
2.9 J
1000 J
430 J
820 J
1800 J
5.6 J
Anthracene'a"b'
57.2
845
Mg'kg
440
"Mi
lMii.l
210
62
53 J
160
33 J
9.6 J
film
«ii
f 41111
I4i 11111
37
Benzo( a janthr acene(a,(b'
108
1050
Mg'kg
12<>iiii
ff.ii"
790
260
920
1100
170 J
36
3IIHI-I
f 1
150
Total PAH17 ND=1 /2RL
1610
22800
Mg/kg
:4ikjii
4124
1273.8
5949
5890
954.5
425.7
lll'JSllll
1-3311
iu.-:n
:sf3im
769
Total PAH34 ND=1 /2RL
1610
22800
Mg/kg
:ii.*sn
32 "ii
33fi'Jii
7502.5
2393.3
8346
11520
2294.5
1731.5
.illS'JIIII
::~sn
: 1 if :u
fnf:ini
1849.5
NOTES:
(a) Analytes included in Total 17 PAH calculations.
(b) Analytes included in Total 34 PAH calculations.
Bolded delected \ sillies evceed TF.C screening \ nine
Molded iind Sluided delected \ allies exceed I'KC screening value
Hg/kg = Microgram(s) per kilogram.
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown Area.
ND = Non-detect.
NSL =No Screening Level.
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
RL = Reporting limit.
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Qualifiers:
J = Compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
J + = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased
high.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
TEC value based onUSEPA Region 5 RCRA Ecological Screening Value (EPA 2003b).
Harbortown Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 9 of 12
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-5 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (feet):
HT 16-30
HT 16-30
HT 16-30
HT 16-30
HT16-30
HT16-30
HT16-31
HT16-31
HT16-31
HT16-31
HT16-32
HT16-32
HT16-32
HT16-33
HT16-30-SURF
HT16-30-0010
HT16-30-1020
HT16-30-2030
HT16-30-2030-FD
HT16-30-3040
HT16-31-SURF
HT16-31-0010
HT16-31 -0010-FD
HT16-31-1030
HT16-32-SURF
HT16-32-0010
HT16-32-1030
HT16-33-SURF
6/8/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/14/2016
6/12/2016
6/12/2016
6/12/2016
6/14/2016
6/12/2016
6/12/2016
6/8/2016
0-0.5
0-1
1-2
2-3
2-3
3-4
0-0.5
0-1
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
1 -Methylnaphthalene
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
110 J
8400 U
1600 J
18000
18000
13000
4900 J
13
10
10
49 J
22 J
7.4
470 U
2-Methylnaphthalene(a)
20.2*
NSL
Mg/kg
100 J
8400 U
9600 U
13000
11000
18000
14000 U
14
9.7
9.7
470 U
28 J
6.1
53 J
Acenaphthene(a) (b)
6.71*
NSL
Mg/kg
450 J
6000 J
7200 J
26000
31000
11000
42000
9.3
4.2
7.8 J
230 J
55
3.8 J
290 J
Acenaphthylene(a,(b'
5.87*
NSL
Mg'kg
480 J
2500 J
1800 J
3300 J
4500 J
810 J
12000 J
2.7 J
1.6 J
3.9 J
120 J
9.5 J
1 J
200 J
Anthracene'a"b'
57.2
845
Mg'kg
1 2<>immi
11 hi hi
28IIIIII
.Willi mi
4r>Mii
5fiHIIII
13
8.4
11
550
47
4.9
740
Benzo( a janthr acene(a,(b'
108
1050
Mg'kg
4MMI
28111 III
I'JIIIHI
.iiiiiiiii
411 ii ii i
fin 111
(18111111
31
25
41 J+
I81111
89
7.3
3000
Benzo(a)pyrene(a,(b'
150
1450
Mg'kg
54i mi
2,)llllll
2 | i ii ii i
.iiiiiiiii
41 iiiiii
54i 111
37
23
36 J+
19UU
95
3.8 U
34(hi
Benzo(b)fluoranthene'a''b'
10400*
NSL
Mg'kg
| >111111
11mill
I fill)III
2IIIIIIU
.>4111111
31
23
33 J+
1600
72
7.8
Benzo(e )pyrene(b)
150
1450
Mg'kg
.>4mi
I "mm
12iiiiii
I ~mill
23iiiin
35
30
20
34
1300
65
3.8 U
22(i(i
Benzo(g,h,i )perylene(a,(b'
170*
NSL
Mg'kg
2900
14000
10000
15000
20000
2500 J
24000
7.9 U
4.2 U
7.8 U
970
28 U
3.8 U
1500
Benzo(k)fluoranthene'a"b'
240*
NSL
Mg'kg
3500
18000
13000
20000
26000
3600 J
44000
29
26
32 J+
1800
86
4.7
2600
CI Chryseiies(b)
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
2500 J
11000 J
9600 U
15000 J
18000 J
4000 U
28000 J
31 J
26 J
48 J
620 J
58 J
14 J
1500 J
CI Fluorenes|b)
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
970 U
8400 U
9600 U
8800 U
11000U
4000 U
15000 J
7.9 J
6.3 J
7.8 U
470 U
28 U
4.4 J
470 U
CI -Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes(b)
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
6500 J
48000 J
36000 J
66000 J
87000 J
12000 J
140000 J
65 J
55 J
110 J
2200 J
170 J
28 J
4800 J
CI -Naphthalenes'1''
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
970 U
8400 U
9600 U
20000 J
20000 J
21000 J
14000 U
19 J
15 J
14 J
470 U
28 U
9.1 J
470 U
CI -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b'
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
2900 J
31000 J
23000 J
60000 J
72000 J
9700 J
110000 J
59 J
40 J
69 J
790 J
140 J
24 J
1900 J
C2 Chrysenes|b)
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
1000 J
8400 U
9600 U
8800 U
11000U
4000 U
14000 J
33 J
35 J
35 J
470 U
37 J
15 J
680 J
C2 Fluorenes|b)
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
970 U
8400 U
9600 U
8800 U
11000U
4000 U
14000 U
17 J
10 J
17 J
470 U
28 U
7.4 J
470 U
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
2400 J
14000 J
9600 J
18000 J
23000 J
4000 U
37000 J
50 J
41 J
63 J
910 J
82 J
27 J
2000 J
C2-Naphthalenes'1''
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
970 U
8400 U
9600 U
48000 J
56000 J
18000 J
69000 J
57 J
40 J
56 J
470 U
120 J
31 J
470 U
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
2000 J
13000 J
9600 U
24000 J
27000 J
4000 U
32000 J
62 J
46 J
80 J
470 U
80 J
28 J
1200 J
C3 Chrysenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
970 U
8400 U
9600 U
8800 U
11000U
4000 U
14000 U
35 J
31 J
38 J
470 U
33 J
22 J
470 U
C3 Fluorenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
970 U
8400 U
9600 U
8800 U
11000U
4000 U
14000 U
20 J
13 J
21 J
470 U
28 U
8.1 J
470 U
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
970 U
8400 U
9600 U
8800 U
11000U
4000 U
14000 U
33 J
32 J
39 J
470 U
33 J
20 J
470 U
C3 -N aphthalenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
970 U
8500 J
9600 U
29000 J
34000 J
7000 J
43000 J
130 J
98 J
140 J
470 U
170 J
64 J
470 U
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
990 J
8400 U
9600 U
13000 J
17000 J
4000 U
15000 J
100 J
99 J
120 J
470 U
100 J
64 J
540 J
C4 Chrysenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
970 U
8400 U
9600 U
8800 U
11000U
4000 U
14000 U
13 J
11 J
15 J
470 U
28 U
8.5 J
470 U
C4-Naphthalenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
970 U
8400 U
9600 U
8800 U
11000U
4000 U
14000 U
110 J
87 J
120 J
470 U
110 J
49 J
470 U
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
970 U
8400 U
9600 U
10000 J
12000 J
6300 J
14000 U
48 J
48 J
61 J
470 U
49 J
22 J
470 U
Chrysene'a"b'
166
1290
W
4800
4111 ii hi
52nn
45
35
58 J+
2iiiin
100
13
33i 111
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene'a"b'
33
NSL
W
860.1
35IMI.I
;-im.l
4
4-1111.I
fOll.l
5riim.l
5.9 J
6.8
8.2 J+
3i 111.1
16 J
1.5 J
4'>(i
Fluoranthene'"'(b)
423
2230
W
6900
41
2(JIHIII
55
Mi
f»3'i"
13
68
31
56 J+
32IIH
210
11
5fiini
Fluorene'a"b'
77.4
536
W
380.1
£4Mi.l
55MH.I
IS
2
5MMI
4
7.9 J
4.7
7.8 J
220 J
33
3.8 J
280 J
Indeno(l ,2,3-cd)pyrene'a"b'
200*
NSL
W
2400
II
1
16
16
20 J+
880
45
3.8 U
1500
Naphthalene'3"1''
176
561
W
To I
¦
9600 U
1
23
10
7.8 J
88 J
28 J
4.7
82 J
Perylene(b'
NSL
NSL
W
TO I
8400 U
9600 U
8800 U
14
12
14
470 U
28 U
6.7
670
Phenanthrene'a"b'
204
1170
W
3800
11
1
18
46
28
37
iMiii
180
15
2fiiin
Pyrene'a"b'
195
1520
W
8700
86
55
94 J+
41(1(1
290
28
ft 1 mi
Total PAH17 ND=1 /2RL
1610
22800
W
50355
3W.SIMI
:5:simi
48-31111
l5fo4n
iii^mih
468.75
309.5
467.1
: 15*13
1397.5
118.3
34135
Total PAH34 ND=1 /2RL
1610
22800
H. .
74880
4') 151 Ml
8| 1 <1111
in:f:im
:3fo4n
15-lH»nn
1305.65
992.1
1453.3
2*>558
2585.5
519.3
4,)*>2 2
NOTES:
(a) Analytes included in Total 17 PAH calculations.
(b) Analytes included in Total 34 PAH calculations.
Bolded delected \ sillies evceed TEC screening \ nine
folded iind Sluidcd delected \nines exceed I'KC screening value
Hg/kg = Microgram(s) per kilogram.
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown Area.
ND = Non-detect.
NSL =No Screening Level.
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
RL = Reporting limit.
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Qualifiers:
J = Compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
J + = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased
high.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
TEC value based onUSEPA Region 5 RCRA Ecological Screening Value (EPA 2003b).
Harbortown Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 10 of 12
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-5 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (feet):
HT16-33
HT16-33
HBT15-A
HBT15-A
HBT15-A
HBT15-A
HBT15-A
HBT15-A
HBT15-B
HBT15-B
HBT15-B
HBT15-B
HBT15-B
HBT15-B
HT16-33-0010
HT16-33-1030
HBT15-A-SURF
HBT15-A-0010
HBT15-A-1030
HBT15-A-3050
HBT15-A-5070
HBT15-A-7010
HBT15-B-SURF
HBT15-B-0010
HBT15-B-1030
HBT15-B-3055
HBT15-B-3055-FD
HBT15-B-5560
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
10/27/2015
10/28/2015
10/28/2015
10/28/2015
10/28/2015
10/28/2015
10/27/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-5
5-7
7-10
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-5.5
3-5.5
5.5-6
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
1 -Methylnaphthalene
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
2200 J
11
140U
350 U
1600U
120
64
1400 U
250 U
810 U
420 U
14000 U
14000 U
810U
2-Methylnaphthalene(a)
20.2*
NSL
M-g'kg
2500 J
12
24 J
110 J
490 J
100 J
81
320 J
57 J
130 J
130 J
14000 U
14000 U
110 J
A.cenaphthene(a,(b'
6.71*
NSL
M-g'kg
6300
11
30 J
240 J
2300
160
25
780 J
380
810
350 J
24000
15000
1600
Acenaphthy lene(a) (b)
5.87*
NSL
M-g'kg
1400 J
2.4 J
12 J
73 J
220 J
41 J
3.1 J
170 J
74 J
810U
420 U
3000 J
1900 J
130 J
Anthracene'a"b'
57.2
845
M-g^g
18
96 J
1 Mill
35mi
240
45
25nii
Sim
1 -nn
limn
45111111
2"nun
23(1(1
Benzo(a)anthracene(a,(b'
108
1050
M-g^g
ISlMMI
22 J+
600
"|im
530
96
fowl
INi mi
.*.*iiii
2 Mm
4-ni 111
2SIMIII
2 Mm
Benzo( a jpyr ene(a,(b'
150
1450
M-g^g
|
24 J+
740
:4"ii
f.5im
460
78
4*>iiii
15nn
3
1 "nn
53
33
2 Mm
Benzo(b)fluoranthene'a"b'
10400*
NSL
M-g^g
| | (Mill
15 J+
1000
370
87
1
¦
Benzo(e )pyrene(b)
150
1450
M-g^g
| | IMMI
17
770
I ~mi
42<>n
350
63
3 Will
Minn
12nn
1
1300
Benzo(g,h,iJperylene(a,(b'
170*
NSL
M-g^g
9300
19 J+
660
12 uu
35UU
250
48
24UU
71U
15UU
lluu
24UUU
15UUU
960
Benzo(k)fluoranthene'a''b'
240*
NSL
M-g'kg
13000
17 J+
770
1800
4500
340
65
3900
1000
2700
1300
29000
18000
1200
CI Chrysenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
7400 J
22 J
230 J
1200 J
2500 J
290 J
44 J
2500 J
490 J
910 J
560 J
16000 J
14000 U
1100 J
CI Fluorenes|b)
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
5900 U
8.7 J
140 U
350 U
1600 U
120 J
25 U
1400U
250 U
810U
420 U
14000 U
14000 U
810 U
CI -Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes(b)
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
35000 J
50 J
760 J
4300 J
9300 J
1000 J
130 J
7300 J
2500 J
3600 J
2200 J
110000 J
67000 J
4900 J
CI -Naphthalenes'1''
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
5900 U
15 J
140U
350 U
1600U
150 J
100 J
1400 U
250 U
810 U
420 U
14000 U
14000 U
810 U
CI -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes^'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
26000 J
58 J
230 J
1900 J
4700 J
800 J
110 J
5300 J
1300 J
1500 J
1200 J
57000 J
32000 J
3300 J
C2 Chryseiies(b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
5900 U
16 J
140 J
570 J
1600U
190 J
43 J
1400 J
250 U
810 U
420 U
14000 U
14000 U
810U
C2 Fluorenes|b)
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
5900 U
12 J
140U
350 U
1600U
160 J
25 U
1400 U
250 U
810 U
420 U
14000 U
14000 U
810U
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
9900 J
31 J
450 J
1900 J
4000 J
500 J
97 J
4800 J
720 J
1200 J
970 J
26000 J
16000 J
1500 J
C 2-N aphthalene s(b)
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
12000 J
49 J
140U
670 J
2700 J
850 J
290 J
2100 J
400 J
810 U
510 J
28000 J
17000 J
2200 J
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes'1''
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
11000 J
54 J
180 J
1000 J
2600 J
610 J
85 J
3200 J
430 J
810 U
450 J
19000 J
14000 U
1300 J
C3 Chrysenes|b)
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
5900 U
17 J
140U
350 U
1600U
140 J
42 J
1400 U
250 U
810 U
420 U
14000 U
14000 U
810U
C3 Fluorenes(b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
5900 U
14 J
140U
350 U
1600U
170 J
25 U
1400 U
250 U
810 U
420 U
14000 U
14000 U
810U
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
5900 U
21 J
180 J
500 J
1600U
240 J
55 J
1600 J
250 U
810 U
420 U
14000 U
14000 U
810U
C3-Naphthalenes(b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
11000 J
88 J
170 J
730 J
3200 J
1300 J
290 J
2300 J
300 J
810 U
420 U
21000 J
14000 U
1600 J
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes'1''
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
5900 U
51 J
170 J
640 J
2000 J
560 J
80 J
2700 J
250 U
810 U
420 U
14000 U
14000 U
810U
C4 Chrysenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
5900 U
7.3 J
140U
350 U
1600U
110U
25 U
1400 U
250 U
810 U
420 U
14000 U
14000 U
810U
C4-Naphthalenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
5900 U
68 J
140U
350 U
2000 J
700 J
150 J
1400 J
250 U
810 U
420 U
14000 U
14000 U
810U
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes'1''
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
5900 U
24 J
140U
350 U
1600U
350 J
57 J
1500 J
250 U
810 U
420 U
14000 U
14000 U
810U
Chrysene'a"b'
166
1290
Mg/kg
| NlMMI
28 J+
880
:f»iiii
(.Mm
490
94
54IH i
I5nn
:«iim
M>( in
43
3
21(1(1
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene'a"b'
33
NSL
Mg/kg
24IMI .1
4.3 J+
190
4lu
81 J
16 J
*J3n .1
:iiu.i
4511.1
;-n.i
(.Mini
4 1
2 mi .1
Fluoranthene'a"b'
423
2230
Mg/kg
.*.*111111
48 J+
1700
53i "i
15
1000
220
13
3-nn
-:iin
4—mi
4WHMI
3 win
Fluorene'a"b'
77.4
536
Mg/kg
55nn .1
10
46 J
35m
Minn
150
41
S4n.l
3Sii
-w i.i
4MI-I
I-
•i~n
[ndeno(l ,2,3-cd)pyrene'a"b'
200*
NSL
Mg/kg
"nil
11 J+
610
1 inn
3 Mm
200
39
2300
f.-n
1 Will
IS
II
-lii.l
Naphthalene'3"1''
176
561
Mg/kg
1 |uu .1
6.7
140 U
i:im.l
62 J
110
320 J
foil. 1
Perylene'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
9.4
220
130
28
1400U
890
¦
Phenanthrene'"'(b'
204
1170
Mg/kg
.iiiiHMi
63
600
3SIMI
15
1000
230
1
3 win
f.Mn
43(in
14
Pyrene'a"b'
195
1520
Mg/kg
^iiiiiMi
60 J+
1200
4:imi
13
1000
170
1
.;-nii
(.inn
4:1m
13
"1111
Total PAH17 ND=1/2RL
1610
22800
Mg/kg
23MiIHI
371.4
9228
3IMU3
Mi
6474
1448.
f,SSf,ll
2 1441
412u?
:i.-3n
Wi«i |im
443*mii
333f»n
Total PAID4 ND=1/2RL
1610
22800
Mg/kg
.>"*)*)fii
939.8
12704
44553
I3n-;n
14299
2929.1
MW»"4n
iw-i
55I4H
355(1(1
1(1431(1(1
M.^illll
534ii5
NOTES:
(a) Analytes included in Total 17 PAH calculations.
(b) Analytes included in Total 34 PAH calculations.
Bolded (lelecled \ sillies evceed TEC screening \ sillie
Molded mid Shnded delected Millies exceed I'KC screening \ silue
Hg/kg = Microgram(s) per kilogram.
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown Area.
ND =Non-detect.
NSL = No Screening Level.
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
RL = Reporting limit.
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Qualifiers:
J = Compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
J + = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased
high.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
TEC value based on USEPA Region 5 RCRA Ecological Screening Value (EPA 2003b).
Harbortown Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan Page 11 of 12
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-5 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (feet):
HBT15-C
HBT15-C
HBT15-C
HBT15-C
HBT15-C
HBT15-C
HBT15-C-SURF
HBT15-C-0010
HBT15-C-1030
HBT15-C-l 030-FD
HBT15-C-3040
HBT15-C-4050
10/30/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
1-3
3-4
4-5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
1 -Methylnaphthalene
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
4400 U
2000 U
750
670
1600
1100
2-Methylnaphthalene(a)
20.2*
NSL
Mg/kg
1600 J
2000 U
240 J
280 J
970 J
800
Acenaphthene(a) (b)
6.71*
NSL
Mg/kg
4000 J
3300
1300
1000
2700
520
Acenaphthylene(a,(b'
5.87*
NSL
Mg/kg
4400 U
580 J
88 J
72 J
170 J
380 U
Anthracene'a"b'
57.2
845
Mg Is
11
55i mi
I5IMI
I2IMI
4SIMI
190 J
Benzo( a janthr acene(a,(b'
108
1050
Mg Is
14
*J.«INI
l^i in
151 HI
5NIMI
220 J
Benzo(a)pyrene(a,(b'
150
1450
Mg Is
12000
•rim
Willll
1300
4()IMI
250 J
Benzo(b)fluoranthene'a''b'
10400*
NSL
Mg Is
11 it it it i
950
140 J
Benzo(e )pyrene(b)
150
1450
Mg Is
7400
.«JINI
•m
830
2i)iiii
380 U
Benzo(g,h,i )perylene(a,(b'
170*
NSL
Mg Isg
5000
40MII
S1U
690
2200
380 J
Benzo(k)fluoranthene'a"b'
240*
NSL
Mg'kg
10000
6400
1100
900
3600
210 J
CI Chryseiies(b)
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
4400 U
3200 J
900 J
610 J
2200 J
380 U
CI Fluorenes|b)
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
4400 U
2000 U
390 J
410 U
1300 U
380 U
CI -Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes(b)
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
12000 J
22000 J
3900 J
2900 J
11000 J
480 J
CI -Naphthalenes'1''
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
4400 U
2000 U
720 J
720 J
1900 J
1300 J
CI -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes(b'
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
7400 J
9800 J
2600 J
1800 J
6900 J
380 U
C2 Chrysenes|b)
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
4400 U
2000 U
470 J
410 U
1300 U
380 U
C2 Fluorenes|b)
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
4400 U
2000 U
390 U
410 U
1300 U
380 U
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
5000 J
5800 J
1700 J
1100 J
3800 J
380 U
C2-Naphthalenes'1''
NSL
NSL
Mg'kg
4400 U
3600 J
2800 J
1900 J
4900 J
540 J
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
4400 U
3700 J
1400 J
810 J
3000 J
380 U
C3 Chiysenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
4400 U
2000 U
390 U
410 U
1300 U
380 U
C3 Fluorenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
4400 U
2000 U
390 U
410 U
1300 U
380 U
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrenes
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
4400 U
2000 U
430 J
410 U
1300 U
380 U
C3 -N aphthalenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
4400 U
3200 J
1900 J
1100 J
3000 J
380 U
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
4400 U
2000 U
1000 J
630 J
1700 J
380 U
C4 Chiysenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
4400 U
2000 U
390 U
410 U
1300 U
380 U
C4-Naphthalenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
4400 U
2000 U
630 J
410 U
1300 U
380 U
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes'b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
4400 U
2000 U
520 J
410 U
1300 U
380 U
Chrysene'a"b'
166
1290
Mg/kg
13000
Nfillll
rim
141 mi
53IMI
310 J
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene'a"b'
33
NSL
Mg/kg
1700.1
*1211.1
i*m.i
Kill .1
5WI.I
27 J
Fluoranthene'"'(b)
423
2230
Mg/kg
39000
If.
3SIMI
.>iHMi
400
Fluorene'a"b'
77.4
536
Mg/kg
5500
24i in
¦j.in
"Mi
23IMI
140 J
Indeno(l ,2,3-cd)pyrene'a"b'
200*
NSL
Mg/kg
5800
35i mi
"I Ml
5SII
2IIMI
100 J
Naphthalene'3"1''
176
561
Mg/kg
3700 J
3'in.l
2111.1
2IMI.I
1
4~IMI
Perylene(b'
NSL
NSL
Mg/kg
¦l ltJtj I
380 U
Phenanthrene'a"b'
204
1170
Mg/kg
43000
1"
5M Ml
45IHI
If.
500
Pyrene'a"b'
195
1520
Mg/kg
27000
42NII
3'iim
12
470
Total PAH17 ND=1 /2RL
1610
22800
Mg/kg
1 2ii-,jii
2f.*w.S
22n*>2
Si 11211
'J357
Total PAH34 ND=1 /2RL
1610
22800
Mg/kg
268900
1S1 l'JII
45*wi3
34*>5~
I225IIH
13727
NOTES:
(a) Analytes included in Total 17 PAH calculations.
(b) Analytes included in Total 34 PAH calculations.
Bolded delected \ sillies evceed TEC screening \ nine
folded iind Sluided delected \nines exceed I'KC screening value
Hg/kg = Microgram(s) per kilogram.
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown Area.
ND = Non-detect.
NSL =No Screening Level.
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
RL = Reporting limit.
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Qualifiers:
J = Compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
J + = the analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased
high.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
TEC value based onUSEPA Region 5 RCRA Ecological Screening Value (EPA 2003b).
Harbortown Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 12 of 12
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-6 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HT16-01
HT16-01
HT16-01
HT16-02
HT16-02
HT16-02
HT16-02
HT16-03
HT16-03
HT16-03
HT16-04
Sample Name:
HT16-01-SURF
HT16-01-0010
HT16-01-1030
HT16-02-SURF
HT16-02-0010
HT16-02-1020
HT16-02-2030
HT16-03-SURF
HT16-03-0010
HT16-03-1030
HT16-04-SURF
Sample Date:
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/7/2016
6/9/2016
6/9/2016
6/9/2016
6/8/2016
6/9/2016
6/9/2016
6/8/2016
Depth Interval (feet):
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
0-1
1-2
2-3
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
6.6 J
5.8
6.9
3.6
6.4
5.7
4.9
4.9
6.9
8.6
5.3
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
55.9
50.5
58.1
23.1 J
44.7
44.1
38.3
18.5 J
37.3
42.1
24.8 J
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
0.71 J
0.63 J
0.3 J
0.41 J
0.81
1.2
0.54 J
0.25 J
0.29 J
0.24 J
0.43 J
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
22.6 J
21.5 J
18.1 J
10
20.8
20.1
15.8
10.8
12.8
15.1
13.1
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
23.2
21.8 J
15.6 J
14 J
25.9 J
33.7 J
18.9 J
7.9 J
11.6 J
10.6 J
12.3 J
Iron
20000®
40000®
mg/kg
22300
18900
18100
8520
17200
13300
13900
9620
14100
14200
11500
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
19.2
19.8
9
12.5
30.7
64.3
28.2
6.9
7.1
7.6
10.4
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
0.24 J
0.17 J
0.11 U
0.19 U
0.24
0.26
0.27
0.13 U
0.1 U
0.11 U
0.17 U
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
30.6
28.2
25.9
11.3
24.9
20.6
18.2
11.6
17.9
17.6
14.5
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
0.91 J
1.7 J
0.51 J
6.6 U
0.83 J
0.52 J
0.52 J
3.6 U
2.9 U
3.9 U
0.78 J
Silver
1.6(a)
2.2(a)
mg/kg
2.2 U
1.5 U
0.9 U
1.9 U
1.6 U
1.1 U
1.1 U
1 U
0.82 U
1.1 U
1.6 U
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
81.3
78.4
45.6
41.9
86.6
114
70.4
31
39.9
35.7
41.2
T otal organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
21200
14000
2180
17500 J
21400 J
31400 J
27000 J
6920 J
9220 J
5670 J
10800 J
Moisture Content
NSL
NSL
%
140
72
17
91.9
75
45.4
46
42.7
15.2
15
63.7
NOTES:
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003.
Bolded detected values exceed the TEC.
liuldi i| .mil Mi.mIi-iI dill rii-il \ .iliii-s i-M-ii-d I In- IT <
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown .
mg/kg = Milligram(s) per kilogram.
NSL = No Screening Level.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000).
TOC = Total organic carbon.
Qualifiers:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than
or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 14
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-6 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (feet):
HT16-04
HT16-04
HT16-05
HT16-05
HT16-05
HT16-05
HT16-05
HT16-06
HT16-06
HT16-06
HT16-07
HT16-07
HT16-07
HT16-04-SURF-FD
HT16-04-0010
HT16-05-SURF
HT16-05-0010
HT16-05-1020
HT16-05-1020-FD
HT16-05-2040
HT16-06-SURF
HT16-06-0010
HT16-06-1030
HT16-07-SURF
HT16-07-0010
HT16-07-1025
6/8/2016
6/10/2016
6/14/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/14/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/14/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
0-0.5
0-1
0-05
0-1
1-2
1-2
2-4
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
0-1
1-2.5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
5
5.3
6.9
2.8 J
10.7 J
9.1 J
7 J
2.8
5.3
6.2
7.3
4.2 J
8.2 J
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
19.5 J
50.4
448
100
32.6
51.5
60.2
300
23.6
53.8
54.9
20.3 J
44.1
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
0.35 J
0.49 I
'J.N
4.1
0.48 J
2.1
0.31 J
2.5
0.32 J
0.37 J
0.82
0.63 J
0.27 J
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
10.2
14.5
125
30.7 .1
13.7 J
22.3 J
16.8 J
66.5
10.3 J
16.9 J
15.6
7.5 J
15.9 J
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
9.9 J
13.2
22N
1112
28.9 J
389 .1
16.4
324
14.7 J
14.5 J
30.9
18.5
12.8
Iron
20000®
40000®
mg/kg
8680
19500
9580
4020
11300
15000
18100
6340
10800
17900
19500
3830
16500
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
9.4
7.7
498
359
34.8
87.3
9.9
3(>(>
20.4
8.9
36
34.6
8.3
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
0.16 U
0.11 I
:.(>
1."
0.11 U
0.15
0.1 U
0.47
0.11 U
0.11 U
0.21
0.34
0.12 U
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
11.4
21.4
~5.2
25.0
16.7
39.1
24.6
17.1
11.8
24.8
23.7
9.5
21.4
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
5.3 U
3.4 U
1.3 .1
0.89 J
3.8 U
0.41 J
3.6 U
3.7 U
3.8 U
0.56 J
3.8 U
7.4 U
0.35 J
Silver
1.6(a)
2.2(a)
mg/kg
1.5 U
0.97 U
1.6
0.66 J
1.1 U
0.22 J
1 U
0.31 J
1.1 U
0.83 U
1.1 U
2.1 U
0.89 U
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
32.2
41.1
llllll
292
51.6 J
202 J
48.2
214
30.9
61.6
200
143
40.6
T otal organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
10900 J
4800
48900
22300
15200
14400
8160
1790
1600
5950
8900
60000
11900
Moisture Content
NSL
NSL
%
70.8
15.5
84
39.8
13.6
14.3
20
36
12
18
36
99
20.9
NOTES:
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003.
Bolded detected values exceed the TEC.
liuldi i| .mil Mi.mIi-iI dill rii-il \ .iliii-s i-M-ii-d I In- IT <
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown .
mg/kg = Milligram(s) per kilogram.
NSL = No Screening Level.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000).
TOC = Total organic carbon.
Qualifiers:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than
or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 2 of 14
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-6 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (feet):
HT16-07
HT16-07
HT16-07
HT16-08
HT16-08
HT16-08
HT16-08
HT16-09
HT16-09
HT16-09
HT16-09
HT16-10
HT16-10
HT 16-07-1025-FD
HT16-07-2540
HT16-07-4060
HT16-08-SURF
HT16-08-0010
HT16-08-1030
HT16-08-1030-FD
HT16-09-SURF
HT16-09-0010
HT16-09-1030
FIT 16-09-1030-FD
HT16-10-0010
HT16-10-1030
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/13/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/13/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
1-2.5
2.5-4
4-6
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
1-3
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
1-3
0-1
1-3
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
11 J
12.6 J
6.7 J
7.5
5.3
5.6
5.3
18.3
4.7
7.1
9.4
8.6
6.6
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
44.7
33.2
51.9
59.2
46.8
53.5
50.5
91.2
47.7
58.2
56.3
30
55.6
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
0.23 J
0.33 J
0.31 J
0.27 J
0.5 U
0.56 U
0.4 U
(>.(>
3.6
0.35 J
0.32 J
0.33 J
0.32 J
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
15.3 J
12.2 J
15.3 J
16.7
15.1
15.8
14.6
4~.<>
32.9
18.1
17.7
13
17.6
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
12.7
15.4
14.9
13.4
13.3
14.1
13.5
1 «><>
41.3
14.9
16.4
12.5
13.8
Iron
20000®
40000®
mg/kg
16200
18900
17300
17600
17200
17600
16400
1 7900
12100
18500
19400
13900
18000
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
8.3
11.1
8.8
8.2 J
8.1
9.2
10.9
4.5" .1
3IW
9.9
12
18.2
8.8
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
0.11 U
0.096 U
0.12 U
0.11 U
0.033 J
0.012 J
0.11 U
0.58
0.29
0.0079 J
0.1 U
0.015 J
0.025 J
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
20.8
24.2
22.2
21.4
20.5
21
20
25.6
17
23.4
26
15.5
22.5
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
3.5 U
0.5 J
0.62 J
2.9 U
3.5 U
3.9 U
2.8 U
1 J
3.5 U
4.1 U
3.2 U
2.8 U
3.3 U
Silver
1.6(a)
2.2(a)
mg/kg
0.99 U
0.84 U
1.2 U
0.83 U
1 U
1.1 U
0.81 U
0.43 J
0.31 J
1.2 U
0.93 U
0.79 U
0.95 U
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
39.2
55.2
43.8
42.3
45.3
45.5
39.1
227
119
45.9
45.4
43.7
61.8
T otal organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
11100
19900
18000
3620
14700
11900
7500
29500
12000
9680
9400
4440
9100
Moisture Content
NSL
NSL
%
20.4
15.9
19.2
23.1
21
20
20
34.3
16.5
18.9
15.9
14
20.1
NOTES:
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003.
Bolded detected values exceed the TEC.
liuldi i| .mil Mi.mIi-iI dill rii-il \ .iliii-s i-M-ii-d I In- I'M
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown .
mg/kg = Milligram(s) per kilogram.
NSL = No Screening Level.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000).
TOC = Total organic carbon.
Qualifiers:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than
or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 3 of 14
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-6 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (feet):
HT16-11
HT16-11
HT16-11
HT16-11
HT16-12
HT16-12
HT16-12
HT16-12
HT16-12
HT16-13
HT16-13
HT16-13
HT16-13
HT16-11-SURF
HT16-11-0010
HT16-11-1015
HT16-11-1530
HT16-12-SURF
HT16-12-0010
HT16-12-1020
HT16-12-2035
HT16-12-3550
HT16-13-SURF
HT16-13-0010
HT16-13-1030
HT16-13-1030-FD
6/10/2016
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
6/14/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/13/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
0-0.5
0-1
1-1.5
1.5-3
0-0.5
0-1
1-2
2-3.5
3.5-5
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
1-3
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
9.2
20.2
83.5
7.8
7.1 J
IS" .1
225.1
11.8 J
6.8 J
4.4
9.2
18
16.9
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
352
398
261
44.2
59.7
600
244
76.1
56.4
43.6
231
733
1060
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
ln.(>
12.3
4.S
0.25 J
1.2
4
1.8 U
0.3 J
0.31 J
2.8
12.5
61.9
84."
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
I2<>
154
"O.S
15.9
37.1 J
491 .1
249 .1
22.5 J
17.2 J
51.6
92.9
262
338
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
43"
414
50S
14.2
39.7
413
105
17.6
15.2
62.4
189
394
424
Iron
20000®
40000®
mg/kg
14000
13400
14200
16900
19300
22SOO
14900
1 1 600
18100
8010
10500
19400
22000
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
1030
¦(>¦ .1
_02 .1
7.4 J
49.5
~<>2
1230
I9S
25.1
121
31"
545
611
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
0.66
0.15 U
0.14 U
0.11 U
0.21
4.2
1.3
0.18
0.11 U
0.18
0.""
¦>
1.2
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
37.6
47.5
36.6
20.2
34.3
50.2
22.6
14.2
23.7
17.5
3<>.<>
1 19
150
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
0.65 J
2.1 J
1.5 J
0.7 J
1.3 J
1.7.1
6.2 U
0.66 J
0.51 J
4.5 U
0.52 J
2.1 J
3.1 J
Silver
1.6(a)
2.2(a)
mg/kg
1.9
3.6
2.6
0.79 U
0.085 J
2.5
0.21 J
1.2 U
1.2 U
0.32 J
1.2.1
¦> ¦>
3.8
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
745
1040
I0(>0
40.5
191
1290
394
77
46
133
440
I2(>0
16"0
T otal organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
10400
63200
62600
11500
41800
79200
43900
20500
8560
15400
54000
123000
115000
Moisture Content
NSL
NSL
%
39.5
48.8
51.9
18.3
241
101
111
55.4
23.3
62
38.6
52.7
53.5
NOTES:
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003.
Bolded detected values exceed the TEC.
liuldi i| .mil Mi.mIi-iI dill rii-il \ .iliii-s i-M-ii-d I In- IT <
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown .
mg/kg = Milligram(s) per kilogram.
NSL = No Screening Level.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000).
TOC = Total organic carbon.
Qualifiers:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than
or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 4 of 14
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-6 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (feet):
HT16-13
HT16-14
HT16-14
HT16-14
HT16-15
HT16-15
HT16-15
HT16-16
HT16-16
HT16-16
HT16-16
HT16-16
HT16-13-3050
HT16-14-SURF
HT16-14-0010
HT16-14-1030
HT16-15-SURF
HT16-15-0010
HT16-15-1030
HT16-16-SURF
HT16-16-0010
HT16-16-1030
HT16-16-1030-FD
HT16-16-3055
6/14/2016
6/13/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/13/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/10/2016
6/12/2016
6/12/2016
6/12/2016
6/12/2016
3-5
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
1-3
3-5.5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
6.3
3.7
7.6
9.7
9.2
11.3
6.5
5.7
6.9
7.3
7.8
12.3
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
52.2
57.6
27.8
51.2
102
390
51.4
24.6 U
18.6
371
173
354
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
0.46 J
1.1
0.21 J
0.44 J
1.6
4.8
0.31 J
0.62 U
1 J
24.2 .1
N.I .1
12*) .1
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
18.2
40.8
10.6
19.5
34.7
47.7
17.9
11.1
12.7
15"
•>:.3
100
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
17.9
48.2
9.7
13.6
43.4
86.7
15
8.8
16
!•)(>
1 10
25o
Iron
20000®
40000®
mg/kg
18200
8370
11900
19400
22600
10800
18500
8900
8950
16100
14300
13700
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
11.3
231
14.3
10.5
121
36?
8.7
11.5
44.2 J
550 .1
2 .1
4SN .1
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
0.013 J
0.3
0.027 J
0.1 U
0.17 J
50.(i
0.12 U
0.15
0.14
0.«>N
0.45
0.5
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
22.6
11.5
12.7
25.3
32.5
24.4
23.5
10.3
11
125
ON.O
45.3
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
0.61 J
3.1 U
3.1 U
3.6 U
0.9 J
0.5 J
0.44 J
4.3 U
3 U
0.33 J
3.9 r
1.3 J
Silver
1.6(a)
2.2(a)
mg/kg
0.96 U
0.35 J
0.88 U
1 U
2.5 U
1.3
0.91 U
0.2 J
0.33 J
-
4.2
1.6
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
49.6
102
36.2
48.3
310
459
45.3
34.7
46.9
"15
3""
S"IO
T otal organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
13600
3870
9850
4190
45800
33600
10900
4090
4010
15400
15600
115000
Moisture Content
NSL
NSL
%
16.9
30
11.4
18.3
160
32.1
19.2
22.6
22.3
24.9
23
40
NOTES:
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003.
Bolded detected values exceed the TEC.
liuldi i| .mil Mi.mIi-iI dill rii-il \ .iliii-s i-M-ii-d I In- IT <
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown .
mg/kg = Milligram(s) per kilogram.
NSL = No Screening Level.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000).
TOC = Total organic carbon.
Qualifiers:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than
or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 5 of 14
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-6 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (feet):
HT16-16
HT16-17
HT16-17
HT16-17
HT16-17
HT16-17
HT16-18
HT16-18
HT16-18
HT16-18
HT16-18
HT16-16-5570
HT16-17-SURF
HT16-17-SURF-FD
HT16-17-0015
HT16-17-1530
HT16-17-3050
HT16-18-SURF
HT16-18B-0010
HT16-18B-1030
HT16-18B-3050
HT16-18B-3050-FD
6/12/2016
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
5.5-7
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-1.5
1.5-3
3-5
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-5
3-5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
6.4
6.6
6.5
4.1
21.7
6
5.4 J
8.1
8.9
12.2
13.4
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
58.1
64.7
66.2
28.4
1890
63.9
7.9 J
16.1 J
273
252
328
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
0.43 U
1.2
1.3
0.68
1
0.58 U
0.32 J
0.98 J
48.9 .1
21.4 .1
35.1 .1
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
18.1
30
36.4
10
34.6
16.4
6.3 J
9.1 J
126 .1
58.9 .1
91.1 .1
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
15.6
36.7
39.6
14.7
72.5
15.7
4.2
40.3 J
250 .1
335 .1
2"<> .1
Iron
20000®
40000®
mg/kg
21400
19100
19300
8120
10000
18100
7100
8790
11 700
1 1000
1 2200
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
8.7 J
42.1
58.8
34.7
2040
21.5
6.9
42.9
500
615
580
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
0.11 U
0.25
0.24 J
0.29
r.4
0.22
0.11 U
0.19
-1
1 1.9
1 1.6
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
24
27.8
28.7
10.1
12.1
21.7
8
11.7
121
35.9
48.1
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
0.38 J
8 U
8.6 U
2.9 U
4.3 I"
4.1 U
3.3 U
3.6 U
1.2.1
1.2.1
1.3 J
Silver
1.6(a)
2.2(a)
mg/kg
0.86 U
2.3 U
2.4 U
0.085 J
0.58 J
1.2 U
0.95 U
0.2 J
4
1 J
1.5
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
45.6
217
183
56.2
891
54.9
25.2
45.6
"01
"59
""8
T otal organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
9570
33900
39400
4930
22500
10500
1610
2270
25400
82700
78800
Moisture Content
NSL
NSL
%
19
200
190
21
37
21
20.9
21
45
43
39
NOTES:
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003.
Bolded detected values exceed the TEC.
liuldi i| .mil Mi.mIi-iI dill rii-il \ .iliii-s i-M-ii-d I In- IT <
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown .
mg/kg = Milligram(s) per kilogram.
NSL = No Screening Level.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000).
TOC = Total organic carbon.
Qualifiers:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than
or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 6 of 14
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-6 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HT16-18
HT16-18
HT16-18
HT16-18
HT16-19
HT16-19
HT16-19
HT16-19
HT16-19
HT16-20
Sample Name:
HT16-18B-5070
HT16-18C-0010
HT16-18C-1025
HT16-18C-2540
HT16-19-SURF
HT16-19-0010
HT16-19-1030
HT16-19-3050
HT16-19-5070
HT16-20-SURF
Sample Date:
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/13/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/13/2016
Depth Interval (feet):
5-7
0-1
1-2.5
2.5-4
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-5
5-7
0-0.5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
7
6.2
7.5
7.1
6.6
12.1
23.1
81.3
6.2
5.2
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
59.5
154
133
57.5
57.9
259
362
521
52.5
72.3
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
0.32 J
III J
3.3 J
0.3 J
0.99
12.3
35.9
3.2
0.46 J
3.3
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
18.5 J
74.9 J
23.2 J
17.1 J
27.1
l(>ll
230
155
17.1
45.6
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
14.5 J
91.9 J
81.8 J
14.1 J
32.2
l<>9
281
385
14.8
54.6
Iron
20000®
40000®
mg/kg
18800
12400
7580
18400
18300
2(>llllll
24~00
24100
18200
7950
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
9.4
4::
4115
9.3
45.4
59S
620
808
8.6
149
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
0.052 J
0.00
3.S
0.11 U
0.2
I.I
4.4
2^ ^
0.11 U
0.61
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
26.3
5N
15.3
24.4
28.8
911.5
82
4(>.l
23.3
32.1
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
0.47 J
3.6 U
0.36 J
3.6 U
1.2 J
0.87 .1
1.8 .1
1.3 .1
4 U
4.5 U
Silver
1.6(a)
2.2(a)
mg/kg
0.89 U
2.2
0.33 J
1 U
0.11 J
4.4
4.1
4."
1.1 U
0.42 J
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
46
416
250
44.6
149
1 loo
1140
I2"0
51.7
266
T otal organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
9730
21900
65800
3830
49600
68100
90100
101000
7210
38500
Moisture Content
NSL
NSL
%
21
28
19
20
300
111
94.3
77.1
18.1
56
NOTES:
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003.
Bolded detected values exceed the TEC.
liuldi i| .mil Mi.mIi-iI dill rii-il \ .iliii-s i-M-ii-d I In- I'M
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown .
mg/kg = Milligram(s) per kilogram.
NSL = No Screening Level.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000).
TOC = Total organic carbon.
Qualifiers:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than
or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 7 of 14
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-6 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HT16-20
HT16-20
HT16-20
HT16-21
HT16-21
HT16-21
HT16-21
HT16-22
HT16-22
HT16-22
Sample Name:
HT16-20-0010
HT16-20-1035
HT16-20-3550
HT16-21-SURF
HT16-21-SURF-FD
HT16-21-0010
HT16-21-1030
HT16-22-SURF
HT16-22-0010
HT16-22-1030
Sample Date:
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
6/10/2016
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
Depth Interval (feet):
0-1
1-3.5
3.5-5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
6.4
15.2
7.1
5.4
4.8
7.5
6.4
3.7
10.2
6.1
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
81.5
282
47.5
70.4
65.6
68.5
55.9
84.7
49.1
54.5
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
3.2
1')
0.38 J
0.87
1.6
0.77
0.36 J
1.8
0.25 J
0.27 J
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
34.2
114
15.7
45.2
30.1
24.3
17.2
45.1
15.4
16.7
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
49.2
14')
15.5
79.7
43.5
20.9
13.3
70.9
14
13.8
Iron
20000®
40000®
mg/kg
16500
16300
16700
17100
11 200
19200
16500
9050
17500
17700
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
64.2
4"2
17.2
130
I3S
34.2 J
8.1 J
149
7.1 J
7.5 J
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
0.35
6.9
0.34
0.27
0.26
0.12 U
0.12 U
0.67
0.11 U
0.1 U
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
28.7
5~.<>
20.9
16.7
22
29.1
22.2
18.8
19.3
21.8
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
5.6 U
1.4.1
0.31 J
3.6 U
4.5 U
0.75 J
0.43 J
3.3 U
2.9 U
0.35 J
Silver
1.6(a)
2.2(a)
mg/kg
0.35 J
(>.3
0.8 U
0.38 J
0.29 J
0.86 U
0.86 U
1.1
0.84 U
0.93 U
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
184
(>45
44.4
170
179
86.9
57.2
178
39.6
41.2
T otal organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
25500
54600
9350
27300
22500
10800
7220
6790
4090
5780
Moisture Content
NSL
NSL
%
120
53.9
15.4
37
32.7
22.3
20.7
37
14.4
20.3
NOTES:
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003.
Bolded detected values exceed the TEC.
liuldi i| .mil Mi.mIi-iI dill rii-il \ .iliii-s i-M-ii-d I In- IT <
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown .
mg/kg = Milligram(s) per kilogram.
NSL = No Screening Level.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000).
TOC = Total organic carbon.
Qualifiers:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than
or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 8 of 14
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-6 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HT16-23
HT16-23
HT16-23
HT16-23
HT16-23
HT16-23
HT16-23
HT16-23
HT16-24
HT16-24
HT16-24
HT16-25
Sample Name:
HT16-23-SURF
HT16-23-0005
HT16-23-0515
HT16-23-100110-DS
HT16-23-110130-DS
HT16-23-150160
HT16-23-1535
HT16-23-90100
HT16-24-SURF
HT16-24-0010
HT16-24-1030
HT16-25-SURF
Sample Date:
6/9/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/9/2016
6/12/2016
6/12/2016
6/10/2016
Depth Interval (feet):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0.5-1.5
10-11
11-13
15-16
1.5-3.5
9-10
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
5.7
6.4
6.8
6.5
7.3
7.4
6.6
6.8
7.5
5.7
6.3
7.6
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
52.5
59.6
34.9
41.5
24.3
58.7
54.9
53.6
66.3
46.6
53
80.3
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
0.85
I-.5.I
0.44 U
0.45 U
0.42 U
0.54 U
0.51 U
0.44 U
0.85
0.48 U
0.56 U
3.4
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
24.3
27
11.7
12.4
8.8
18.2
17.4
16.4
21.1
14.1
16.2
38.4
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
58.3 J
79.1
13
12.4
10.2
14.9
13.6
13.6
17.5 J
12.1
13.7
62.5
Iron
20000®
40000®
mg/kg
16600
14700
12600
15000
10800
21200
20400
21700
21300
20100
22000
30500
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
86.9
N95 .1
9.6 J
19.2
4.4
8.6 J
8.5 J
7.6 J
26.3
7.1 J
7.8 J
130
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
0.24
0.21
0.022 J
0.11 U
0.11 U
0.03 J
0.034 J
0.1 U
0.12 U
0.11 U
0.11 U
0.63
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
15.9
20.6
12.9
15.3
12.2
23
21.4
21.5
26.6
18.9
21.9
36.3
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
1.1 J
3.1 U
3 U
3.1 U
2.9 U
3.8 U
3.6 U
3.1 U
3.2 U
3.3 U
3.9 U
0.95 J
Silver
1.6(a)
2.2(a)
mg/kg
0.21 J
0.98
0.87 U
0.89 U
0.84 U
1.1 U
1 U
0.89 U
0.92 U
0.95 U
1.1 U
0.53 J
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
125
126
42.3
45.6
28
44.6
40.9
42.1
74.9
37.3
48.9
281
T otal organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
10900 J
22400
12500
15100
3760
8020
4530
15500
11900 J
9680
7680
37700
Moisture Content
NSL
NSL
%
41.8
12
14.9
19.7
18.1
20
20.6
19.6
29.3
20.7
21.1
238
NOTES:
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003.
Bolded detected values exceed the TEC.
liuldi i| .mil Mi.mIi-iI dill rii-il \ .iliii-s i-M-ii-d I In- IT <
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown .
mg/kg = Milligram(s) per kilogram.
NSL = No Screening Level.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000).
TOC = Total organic carbon.
Qualifiers:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than
or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 9 of 14
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-6 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HT16-25
HT16-25
HT16-25
HT16-26
HT16-26
HT16-26
HT16-27
HT16-27
HT16-27
HT16-27
Sample Name:
HT16-25-SURF-FD
HT16-25-0010
HT16-25-1030
HT16-26-SURF
HT16-26-0010
HT16-26-1030
HT16-27-SURF
HT16-27-0010
HT16-27-1020
HT16-27-2030
Sample Date:
6/10/2016
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
6/10/2016
6/12/2016
6/12/2016
6/9/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
Depth Interval (feet):
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
0-1
1-2
2-3
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
8
6.6
7.9
6.5
4.5
3.9
6.1
8.6
8.8
4.9
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
83.7
93.7
65.6
63.5
39.6
30.5
78.5
65.8
46.5
38.4
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
3.5
0.8
0.34 J
1
0.43 U
0.42 U
0.65
1.6 J
1.4 J
0.55 U
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
40.4
22.2
20.7
27.6
12.3
12
20.6
27.9
16.5
12.5
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
65.4
45.8
19.1
36.9
11.1
9.1
33.4 J
77.2
39.6
11.9
Iron
20000®
40000®
mg/kg
26600
20200
19500
30400
18100
12500
11800
44900
42500
14600
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
122
159 J
12.9 J
38.6
6.7 J
5.1 J
59.3
5IS.I
3ISO .1
12 J
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
0.65
0.15 U
0.1 U
0.2
0.12 U
0.11 U
0.15
0.3
0.12
0.096 U
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
39.1
24.1
24
32
15.2
13.2
17
25.2
19.4
13.3
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
1.1 J
0.82 J
3.6 U
1.1 J
3 U
2.9 U
4.5 U
4.1 U
2.9 U
3.8 U
Silver
1.6(a)
2.2(a)
mg/kg
0.57 J
1.3 U
1 U
0.89 U
0.86 U
0.84 U
0.16 J
0.38 J
0.36 J
1.1 U
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
293
172
54.8
179
34.2
29.9
101
186
151
34.8
T otal organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
38800
26100
7690
39700
12800
6790
24900 J
15000
24500
11100
Moisture Content
NSL
NSL
%
252
33.1
15.6
224
20.3
18.6
77.9
34.2
11.8
12.4
NOTES:
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003.
Bolded detected values exceed the TEC.
liuldi i| .mil Mi.mIi-iI dill rii-il \ .iliii-s i-M-ii-d I In- IT <
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown .
mg/kg = Milligram(s) per kilogram.
NSL = No Screening Level.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000).
TOC = Total organic carbon.
Qualifiers:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than
or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 10 of 14
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-6 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HT16-27
HT16-28
HT16-28
HT16-28
HT16-28
HT16-28
HT16-29
HT16-29
HT16-29
HT16-29
HT16-30
HT16-30
Sample Name:
HT16-27-3040
HT16-28-SURF
HT16-28-0010
HT16-28-1020
HT16-28-6575
HT16-28-7590
HT16-29-SURF
HT16-29-1020
HT16-29-2035
HT16-29-3550
HT16-30-SURF
HT16-30-0010
Sample Date:
6/10/2016
6/14/2016
6/12/2016
6/12/2016
6/12/2016
6/12/2016
6/14/2016
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
6/8/2016
6/10/2016
Depth Interval (feet):
3-4
0-0.5
0-1
1-2
6.5-75
7.5-9
0-0.5
1-2
2-3.5
3.5-5
0-0.5
0-1
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
5
5
6
5.9
5.6
16.6
8.2 J
6.4
9.2
7
5
2.5
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
33.6
61.9
69.2
39.1
169
447
80.5
217
104
53.5
58.2
36.4
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
0.57 U
1.3
1.8
0.57 U
0.45 1"
34.4 .1
0.87
25
3
0.38 J
0.79
0.7
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
11
36.1
34.2
13
13.1
"05
ISO.I
S0.5
22
18.1
24
17.3
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
10.7
39.7
34.8
11.1
10.4
40"
24
13"
111
16.5
70.5 J
30.7
Iron
20000®
40000®
mg/kg
13100
18900
18900
14700
14500
2<>900
49300
1 1 900
9940
18100
11800
5800
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
7.2 J
44.3
67
8.9
7.8 J
"(>9 .1
25.1
4S9 .1
5SI .1
17.2 J
105
83.5
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
0.11 U
0.19 J
0.23
0.11 U
0.019.1
<>."
0.25
1.2
2.3
0.11 U
0.17
0.3
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
12
28.8
29.1
15.8
15
ION
11.8
51.9
17.9
26.8
14.4
11.5
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
4 U
7.5 U
0.91 J
0.54 J
3.1 I
1.9 .1
2.5 J
1.4 J
3.3 U
0.64 J
4.9 U
1.6 J
Silver
1.6(a)
2.2(a)
mg/kg
1.1 U
0.16 J
0.44 J
1.1 U
0.91
4.1
0.75 J
0.9 J
0.62 J
0.82 U
0.15 J
0.26 J
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
27
151
165
38.2
34
1250
80.3
435
279
53.5
141
90.7
T otal organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
4500
44200
28700
5470
15100
118000
9310
24100
40900
6660
5810 J
17800
Moisture Content
NSL
NSL
%
14.3
200
84.7
22.2
15.9
86.5
23.3
17
31.2
18.5
34.6
26.5
NOTES:
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003.
Bolded detected values exceed the TEC.
liuldi i| .mil Mi.mIi-iI dill rii-il \ .iliii-s i-M-ii-d I In- IT <
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown .
mg/kg = Milligram(s) per kilogram.
NSL = No Screening Level.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000).
TOC = Total organic carbon.
Qualifiers:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than
or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 11 of 14
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-6 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (feet):
HT16-30
HT16-30
HT16-30
HT16-30
HT16-31
HT16-31
HT16-31
HT16-31
HT16-32
HT16-32
HT16-30-1020
HT16-30-2030
HT16-30-2030-FD
HT16-30-3040
HT16-31-SURF
HT16-31-0010
HT 16-31-0010-FD
HT16-31-1030
HT16-32-SURF
HT16-32-0010
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/14/2016
6/12/2016
6/12/2016
6/12/2016
6/14/2016
6/12/2016
1-2
2-3
2-3
3-4
0-0.5
0-1
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
0-1
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
4.4
5.6
6.3
6.1
1.9
6.9
7.4
7.9
8.7
6.6
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
236
189
210
50
65.2
66.6
67.1
64.4
72.5
51.2
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
3.7
S.I
4.8
0.59 U
0.73 U
0.35 J
0.35 J
0.31 J
1
0.34 J
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
57.3
49."
44.6
14.8
2.7
18.7
21
19.4
19.8
18.5
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
89.3
90.5
98.9
12.9
6.5
19.5
15.7
15
23.4
15
Iron
20000®
40000®
mg/kg
9350
9700
10100
17900
1930
19100
19300
19400
17600
18700
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
?i:
3 "3
411
28.1
13.3
13.3 J
9.2 J
8.6 J
52.7
10.6 J
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
n.s:
i.:
1.2
0.26
0.36
0.11 U
0.13 U
0.11 U
0.26
0.11 U
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
23.6
34.9
27.5
17.6
5.8 U
23.8
24.5
24.5
17.4
22.6
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
3.7 U
0.87 J
1.5 J
0.86 J
5.1 U
0.81 J
0.65 J
0.79 J
3.4 U
3.4 U
Silver
1.6(a)
2.2(a)
mg/kg
0.62 J
0.88 J
0.99 J
1.2 U
1.5 U
1.2 U
1.1 U
1.1 U
0.98 U
0.96 U
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
343
543
457
47.3
44.4
47.2
48.3
47.3
130
48.9
T otal organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
32100
62900
74600
13800
36700
7590
10300
7210
32300
6730
Moisture Content
NSL
NSL
%
34.1
34.2
39.7
21.7
75
20.3
19.4
18.1
34
16.7
NOTES:
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003.
Bolded detected values exceed the TEC.
liuldi i| .mil Mi.mIi-iI dill rii-il \ .iliii-s i-M-ii-d I In- IT <
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown .
mg/kg = Milligram(s) per kilogram.
NSL = No Screening Level.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000).
TOC = Total organic carbon.
Qualifiers:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than
or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 12 of 14
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-6 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HT16-32
HT16-33
HT16-33
HT16-33
HBT15-A
HBT15-A
HBT15-A
HBT15-A
HBT15-A
HBT15-A
Sample Name:
HT16-32-1030
HT16-33-SURF
HT16-33-0010
HT16-33-1030
HBT15-A-SURF
HBT15-A-0010
HBT15-A-1030
HBT15-A-3050
HBT15-A-5070
HBT15-A-7010
Sample Date:
6/12/2016
6/8/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
10/27/2015
10/28/2015
10/28/2015
10/28/2015
10/28/2015
10/28/2015
Depth Interval (feet):
1-3
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-5
5-7
7-10
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
7.4
3
3.9
6.9
8.3 J
5.7 J
7 J
8.2 J
7.2 J
4.1 J
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
47.6
61.1
172
53.5
103 J
62.1 J
162 J
87.5 J
49.5 J
82.9 J
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
0.24 J
0.91
2.1
0.58 U
1.4
1
4
1.2
0.053 J
1.3
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
15.2
37.8
43.6
17.6
55.6 J
31 J
45.2 J
31.5 J
18.3 J
26.1 J
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
13.7
50.2 J
106
14.4
60.7 J
40.7 J
55.6 J
31.9 J
13.8 J
26.7 J
Iron
20000®
40000®
mg/kg
15300
10200
9240
20000
25900 J
16200 J
12500 J
18600 J
16700 J
11300 J
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
7.4 J
116
350
8.6
64.4
173
2<>N
73.4
13.1
60.8
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
0.099 U
0.56
1.5
0.11 U
0.35
0.14 J
0.31
0.13
0.059 J
1.5
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
18.2
19.6
20.1
23.1
44
25.2
31
28.2
18.5
15.5
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
0.55 J
0.66 J
0.7 .1
4.1 U
1.8 J
1 J
0.8 J
4 U
0.54 J
0.5 J
Silver
1.6(a)
2.2(a)
mg/kg
0.87 U
1.7
2.4
1.2 U
0.44 J
0.19 J
0.69 J
0.21 J
0.92 U
1 U
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
37
136
288
44
230 J
138 J
343 J
174 J
40.8 J
101 J
T otal organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
4300
5120 J
22600
9510
54300 J
36900 J
45300 J
33000 J
18000 J
37200 J
Moisture Content
NSL
NSL
%
16.3
33.4
31.8
26.7
167
62
42.6
23
17.4
25
NOTES:
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003.
Bolded detected values exceed the TEC.
liuldi i| .mil Mi.mIi-iI dill rii-il \ .iliii-s i-M-ii-d I In- I'M
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown .
mg/kg = Milligram(s) per kilogram.
NSL = No Screening Level.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000).
TOC = Total organic carbon.
Qualifiers:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than
or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 13 of 14
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-6 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (feet):
HBT15-B
HBT15-B
HBT15-B
HBT15-B
HBT15-B
HBT15-B
HBT15-C
HBT15-C
HBT15-C
HBT15-C
HBT15-C
HBT15-C
HBT15-B-SURF
HBT15-B-0010
HBT15-B-1030
HBT15-B-3055
HBT15-B-3055-FD
HBT15-B-5560
HBT15-C-SURF
HBT15-C-0010
HBT15-C-1030
HBT15-C-1030-FD
HBT15-C-3040
HBT15-C-4050
10/27/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
10/30/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-5.5
3-5.5
5.5-6
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
1-3
3-4
4-5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
4.4 J
9.5 J
9.1 J
4.8 J
4.1 J
7.7 J
5.7 J
3.5 J
7.3 J
9.2 J
10.2 J
6.2 J
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
60.3 J
81.4 J
76.6 J
145 J
255 J
72.7 J
45.3 J
50.8 J
58 J
70.1 J
80.2 J
61.3 J
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
0.3 J
0.43 J
0.39 J
2.2 J
1.9 J
0.38 J
0.26 J
0.55 J
0.34 J
0.14 J
0.1 J
0.079 J
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
53.7 J
15.4 J
16 J
29 J
34.1 J
16.4 J
28.2 J
20.1 J
20.3 J
15 J
14.9 J
14.3 J
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
55.7 J
44.1 J
45.8
52.1
76.4
26.8
19.6 J
30.9
45.3
41.8
76.1
17.6
Iron
20000®
40000®
mg/kg
14600 J
1 5600
18700
1 2800
11 200
19400
10900
9780
14500
1 7300
21000
18900
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
59.8
155
112 J
"00 .1
510.1
200.1
49.7
143.1
104 J
212 .1
204 .1
125 J
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
0.11 J
0.25
0.23
0.51 J
r.i .i
0.21
0.11 J
0.29
0.27
0.39
0.31
0.12
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
19.1
17.9 J
27.1 J
21.4 J
32.4 J
22.1 J
16.7 J
23.2 J
30.9 J
20.2 J
22.5 J
21.3 J
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
0.81 J
1.1 J
0.91 J
0.78 J
0.97 J
0.82 J
3.5 U
3.4 U
0.39 J
0.78 J
0.44 J
3.5 U
Silver
1.6(a)
2.2(a)
mg/kg
0.21 J
1.1 U
0.16 J
0.47 J
0.51 J
0.22 J
1 U
0.41 J
0.74 J
0.18 J
0.14 J
0.098 J
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
77.5 J
125 J
118 J
434 J
283 J
104 J
83.8 J
108 J
92.9 J
97.6 J
189 J
63.9 J
T otal organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
7760 J
41000
29100
203000
149000
20900
4500
110000
19500
12800
24300
13200
Moisture Content
NSL
NSL
%
33.9
22.9
23.9
25.1
27.8
18.2
29.6
21.9
20.7
23.4
18.5
16.1
NOTES:
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003.
Bolded detected values exceed the TEC.
liuldi i| .mil Mi.mIi-iI dill rii-il \ .iliii-s i-M-ii-d I In- IT <
FD = Field Duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown .
mg/kg = Milligram(s) per kilogram.
NSL = No Screening Level.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000).
TOC = Total organic carbon.
Qualifiers:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and greater than
or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 14 of 14
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-7 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR SEM/AVS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HT16-01
HT16-02
HT16-03
HT16-04
HT16-04
HT16-05
HT16-06
HT16-07
Sample Name:
HT16-01-SURF
HT16-02-SURF
HT16-03-SURF
HT16-04-SURF
HT16-04-SURF-FD
HT16-05-SURF
HT16-06-SURF
HT16-07-SURF
Sample Date:
6/15/2016
6/7/2016
6/8/2016
6/8/2016
6/8/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
Depth Interval (feet):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
Cadmium
|iinolc/g
0.0036
0.0051
0.00098 J
0.002
0.0021
0.1
0.035
0.0073
Copper
|iinolc/g
0.28
0.15
0.08
0.13
0.14
0.077
1.5
0.26
Lead
|iinolc/g
0.094
0.09
0.026
0.048
0.051
2.6
2.6
0.24
Mercury
|iinolc/g
0.00007 U
0.000015 J
0.000016 J
0.000027 J
0.000018 J
0.000048 U
0.00011
0.00009
Nickel
|iinolc/g
0.28
0.13
0.078
0.12
0.12
0.93
0.32
0.36
Zinc
|iinolc/g
0.72
0.56
0.21
0.37
0.39
13
2
1.8
Acid Volatile Sulfides (AVS)
|iinolc/g
12
4.8
0.88
4.2
4.4
65
1.3
0.82
SEM/AVS Ratio
none
0.12
0.2
0.45
0.16
0.16
0.26
4.8
3.2
NOTES:
Bolded values exceed 1 SEM/AVS ratio.
SEM/AVS not calculated because AVS was not detected.
|jmole/g = micromole per gram .
AVS = Acid volatile sulfides
FD = Field duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown.
SEM = Simultaneously extracted metals.
Qualifiers:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
J - = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit, but may be biased low.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 6
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-7 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR SEM/AVS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HT16-08
HT16-09
HT16-11
HT16-12
HT16-13
HT16-14
HT16-15
HT16-16
Sample Name:
HT16-08-SURF
HT16-09-SURF
HT16-11-SURF
HT16-12-SURF
HT16-13-SURF
HT16-14-SURF
HT16-15-SURF
HT16-16-SURF
Sample Date:
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
6/10/2016
6/14/2016
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
6/10/2016
Depth Interval (feet):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
Cadmium
|iinolc/g
0.00051 J
0.031
0.094
0.0098
0.033
0.006
0.0089
0.0031
Copper
|iinolc/g
0.094
1.6
1.2
0.58
0.6
0.37
0.45
0.2
Lead
|iinolc/g
0.025
1.5
3.4
0.24
1
0.45
0.23
0.099
Mercury
|iinolc/g
0.00003 U
0.000018 J
0.000013 J
0.000041 J
0.000043 U
0.000048
0.000065 U
0.00006
Nickel
|iinolc/g
0.12
0.33
1.3
0.39
0.21
0.18
0.34
0.092 J
Zinc
|iinolc/g
0.19
3.8
7.7
2.6
2.3
1
2
0.41
Acid Volatile Sulfides (AVS)
|iinolc/g
0.57 U
5.5
8.5
20
4.3
0.72
16
0.22 J
SEM/AVS Ratio
none
--
1.3
1.6
0.2
0.96
2.8
0.19
3.7
NOTES:
Bolded values exceed 1 SEM/AVS ratio.
SEM/AVS not calculated because AVS was not detected.
|jmole/g = micromole per gram .
AVS = Acid volatile sulfides
FD = Field duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown.
SEM = Simultaneously extracted metals.
Qualifiers:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
J - = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit, but may be biased low.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 2 of 6
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-7 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR SEM/AVS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HT16-17
HT16-17
HT16-18
HT16-19
HT16-20
HT16-21
HT16-21
Sample Name:
HT16-17-SURF
HT16-17-SURF-FD
HT16-18-SURF
HT16-19-SURF
HT16-20-SURF
HT16-21-SURF
HT16-21-SURF-FD
Sample Date:
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
6/14/2016
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
Depth Interval (feet):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
Cadmium
|iinolc/g
0.0067
0.0085
0.0021
0.0089
0.036
0.0071
0.0079
Copper
|iinolc/g
0.41
0.48
0.071
0.52
0.68
0.47
0.56
Lead
|iinolc/g
0.18
0.23
0.036
0.32
0.89
0.53
0.53
Mercury
|iinolc/g
0.00007 U
0.000065 U
0.000024 J
0.0001 U
0.000043 U
0.000034 U
0.000034 U
Nickel
|iinolc/g
0.27
0.31
0.066 J
0.38
0.35
0.14
0.18
Zinc
|iinolc/g
1.8
2.1
0.32
2.3
4.2
2.2
2
Acid Volatile Sulfides (AVS)
|iinolc/g
9
12
0.57 U
28
6
3.9
3.6
SEM/AVS Ratio
none
0.3
0.26
--
0.13
1
0.85
0.91
NOTES:
Bolded values exceed 1 SEM/AVS ratio.
" SEM/AVS not calculated because AVS was not detected.
|jmole/g = micromole per gram .
AVS = Acid volatile sulfides
FD = Field duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown.
SEM = Simultaneously extracted metals.
Qualifiers:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
J - = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit, but may be biased low.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 3 of 6
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-7 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR SEM/AVS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HT16-22
HT16-23
HT16-24
HT16-25
HT16-25
HT16-26
HT16-27
HT16-28
HT16-29
Sample Name:
HT16-22-SURF
HT16-23-SURF
HT16-24-SURF
HT16-25-SURF
HT16-25-SURF-FD
HT16-26-SURF
HT16-27-SURF
HT16-28-SURF
HT16-29-SURF
Sample Date:
6/10/2016
6/9/2016
6/9/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/9/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
Depth Interval (feet):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
Cadmium
|iinolc/g
0.015
0.0085
0.0019
0.046
0.031
0.0081
0.0089
0.0098
0.0029
Copper
|iinolc/g
0.6
0.9
0.15
0.9
0.91
0.57
0.27
0.63
0.16
Lead
|iinolc/g
0.75
0.53
0.14
0.66
0.64
0.22
0.18
0.29
0.27
Mercury
|iinolc/g
0.000034 U
0.000035 J
0.000014 J
0.00009 U
0.000095 U
0.000034 J
0.000024 J
0.00008 U
0.000019 J
Nickel
|iinolc/g
0.27
0.19
0.15
0.5
0.47
0.36
0.15
0.39
0.084
Zinc
|iinolc/g
2.4
1.8
0.46
5
4.5
2.5
0.97
2.4
0.59
Acid Volatile Sulfides (AVS)
|iinolc/g
8.7
1.2
0.62 U
42
58
28
0.29 J
23
0.71
SEM/AVS Ratio
none
0.46
2.8
--
0.17
0.11
0.13
5.5
0.16
1.6
NOTES:
Bolded values exceed 1 SEM/AVS ratio.
SEM/AVS not calculated because AVS was not detected.
|jmole/g = micromole per gram .
AVS = Acid volatile sulfides
FD = Field duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown.
SEM = Simultaneously extracted metals.
Qualifiers:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
J - = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit, but may be biased low.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 4 of 6
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-7 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR SEM/AVS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HT16-30
HT16-31
HT16-32
HT16-33
HBT15-A
Sample Name:
HT16-30-SURF
HT16-31-SURF
HT16-32-SURF
HT16-33-SURF
HBT15-A-SURF
Sample Date:
6/8/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/8/2016
10/27/2015
Depth Interval (feet):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-05
Analyte
Unit
Cadmium
|iinolc/g
0.006
0.012
0.0066
0.012
0.0062 J
Copper
|iinolc/g
0.66
0.59
0.34
0.64
0.55
Lead
|iinolc/g
0.59
0.65
0.28
0.55
0.22
Mercury
|iinolc/g
0.000026 J
0.000049
0.000041
0.000065
0.00007 R
Nickel
|iinolc/g
0.14
0.23
0.17
0.21
0.29 J
Zinc
|iinolc/g
4.8
2.3
1.1
1.8
2.1
Acid Volatile Sulfides (AVS)
|iinolc/g
0.69 U
1.7
1
0.67 U
13
SEM/AVS Ratio
none
--
2.2
1.9
--
0.25
NOTES:
Bolded values exceed 1 SEM/AVS ratio.
" SEM/AVS not calculated because AVS was not detected.
|jmole/g = micromole per gram .
AVS = Acid volatile sulfides
FD = Field duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown.
SEM = Simultaneously extracted metals.
Qualifiers:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
J - = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit, but may be biased low.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 5 of 6
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-7 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR SEM/AVS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HBT15-B
HBT15-C
Sample Name:
HBT15-B-SURF
HBT15-C-SURF
Sample Date:
10/27/2015
10/30/2015
Depth Interval (feet):
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
Cadmium
|iinolc/g
0.0029 J
0.0022 J
Copper
|iinolc/g
0.22
0.26 J
Lead
|iinolc/g
0.26
0.38 J
Mercury
|iinolc/g
0.000035 J-
0.00006 J
Nickel
|iinolc/g
0.077 J
0.14 J
Zinc
|iinolc/g
0.84
1.1 J
Acid Volatile Sulfides (AVS)
|iinolc/g
0.72 U
0.67 U
SEM/AVS Ratio
none
--
--
NOTES:
Bolded values exceed 1 SEM/AVS ratio.
SEM/AVS not calculated because AVS was not detected.
|jmole/g = micromole per gram .
AVS = Acid volatile sulfides
FD = Field duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown.
SEM = Simultaneously extracted metals.
Qualifiers:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
J - = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit, but may be biased low.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 6 of 6
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-8 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR TPHs, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HT 16-01
HT 16-02
HT 16-03
HT 16-04
HT 16-04
HT 16-05
HT 16-06
HT 16-07
Sample Name:
HT 16-01-SURF
HT16-02-SURF
HT 16-03-SURF
HT16-04-SURF
HT16-04-SURF-FD
HT 16-05-SURF
HT16-06-SURF
HT16-07-SURF
Sample Date:
6/15/2016
6/7/2016
6/8/2016
6/8/2016
6/8/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
Depth Interval (feet):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
foe
fraction
0.0212
0.0175
0.00692
0.0108
0.0109
0.0489
0.00179
0.0089
Diesel Range Organics (CIO - C28)
mg/kg
170
210
67
46
57
2800
200
850
DRO Sample-Specific Risk Screening Level
mg/kg
118
97
38
60
60
271
10
49
Oil Range Organics (C20-C36)
mg/kg
220
240
65
53
61
3600
290
1100
ORO Sample-Specific Risk Screening Level
mg/kg
210
173
68
107
108
483
18
88
I TPH
mg/kg
390
450
132
99
118
6400
490
1950
NOTES:
- Sediment benchmark for DRO used in calculation of sample-
specific risk screening level is 5543 mg/kg
- Sediment benchmark for ORO used in calculation of sample-
specific risk screening level is 9883 mg/kg
Bolded detected values exceed the Sample-Specific Risk Screening
Level
DRO = Diesel range organics.
FD = Field duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown.
mg/kg = Milligram(s) per kilogram.
ORO = Oil range organics.
TPH = Total petroleum hydrocarbons.
£ TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
I TPH = DRO (C10-C20) + ORO (C20-C36)
Qualifier:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 6
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-8 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR TPHs, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HT16-08
HT 16-09
HT16-11
HT16-12
HT16-13
HT16-14
HT16-15
HT16-16
Sample Name:
HT16-08-SURF
HT16-09-SURF
HT 16-11-SURF
HT16-12-SURF
HT 16-13-SURF
HT16-14-SURF
HT 16-15-SURF
HT16-16-SURF
Sample Date:
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
6/10/2016
6/14/2016
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
6/10/2016
Depth Interval (feet):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
foe
fraction
0.00362
0.0295
0.0104
0.0418
0.0154
0.00387
0.0458
0.00409
Diesel Range Organics (CIO - C28)
mg/kg
53
1800
1700
460
400
370
420
360
DRO Sample-Specific Risk Screening Level
mg/kg
20
164
58
232
85
21
254
23
Oil Range Organics (C20-C36)
mg/kg
46
2100
2100
770
490
430
560
390
ORO Sample-Specific Risk Screening Level
mg/kg
36
292
103
413
152
38
453
40
I TPH
mg/kg
99
3900
3800
1230
890
800
980
750
NOTES:
- Sediment benchmark for DRO used in calculation of sample-
specific risk screening level is 5543 mg/kg
- Sediment benchmark for ORO used in calculation of sample-
specific risk screening level is 9883 mg/kg
Bolded detected values exceed the Sample-Specific Risk Screening
Level
DRO = Diesel range organics.
FD = Field duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown.
mg/kg = Milligram(s) per kilogram.
ORO = Oil range organics.
TPH = Total petroleum hydrocarbons.
I TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
I TPH = DRO (C10-C20) + ORO (C20-C36)
Qualifier:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 2 of 6
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-8 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR TPHs, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (feet):
HT16-17
HT16-17
HT16-18
HT16-19
HT 16-20
HT 16-21
HT 16-21
HT16-17-SURF
HT16-17-SURF-FD
HT16-18-SURF
HT16-19-SURF
HT16-20-SURF
HT 16-21-SURF
HT 16-21-SURF-FD
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
6/14/2016
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
foe
fraction
0.0339
0.0394
0.00161
0.0496
0.0385
0.0273
0.0225
Diesel Range Organics (CIO - C28)
mg/kg
390
250
1000
200 J
1100
410
5700
DRO Sample-Specific Risk Screening Level
mg/kg
188
218
9
275
213
151
125
Oil Range Organics (C20-C36)
mg/kg
550
350
1100
290
1700
500
5400
ORO Sample-Specific Risk Screening Level
mg/kg
335
389
16
490
380
270
222
I TPH
mg/kg
940
600
2100
490
2800
910
11100
NOTES:
- Sediment benchmark for DRO used in calculation of sample-
specific risk screening level is 5543 mg/kg
- Sediment benchmark for ORO used in calculation of sample-
specific risk screening level is 9883 mg/kg
Bolded detected values exceed the Sample-Specific Risk Screening
Level
DRO = Diesel range organics.
FD = Field duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown.
mg/kg = Milligram(s) per kilogram.
ORO = Oil range organics.
TPH = Total petroleum hydrocarbons.
£ TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
I TPH = DRO (C10-C20) + ORO (C20-C36)
Qualifier:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 3 of 6
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-8 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR TPHs, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HT 16-22
HT 16-23
HT 16-24
HT 16-25
HT 16-25
HT 16-26
HT 16-27
Sample Name:
HT16-22-SURF
HT 16-23-SURF
HT16-24-SURF
HT 16-25-SURF
HT16-25-SURF-FD
HT16-26-SURF
HT16-27-SURF
Sample Date:
6/10/2016
6/9/2016
6/9/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/9/2016
Depth Interval (feet):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
foe
fraction
0.00679
0.0109
0.0119
0.0377
0.0388
0.0397
0.0249
Diesel Range Organics (CIO - C28)
mg/kg
1200
490 J
320 J
220
180
53 J
120 J
DRO Sample-Specific Risk Screening Level
mg/kg
38
60
66
209
215
220
138
Oil Range Organics (C20-C36)
mg/kg
1400
560
290
330
280
78
130
ORO Sample-Specific Risk Screening Level
mg/kg
67
108
118
373
383
392
246
I TPH
mg/kg
2600
1050
610
550
460
131
250
NOTES:
- Sediment benchmark for DRO used in calculation of sample-
specific risk screening level is 5543 mg/kg
- Sediment benchmark for ORO used in calculation of sample-
specific risk screening level is 9883 mg/kg
Bolded detected values exceed the Sample-Specific Risk Screening
Level
DRO = Diesel range organics.
FD = Field duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown.
mg/kg = Milligram(s) per kilogram.
ORO = Oil range organics.
TPH = Total petroleum hydrocarbons.
£ TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
I TPH = DRO (C10-C20) + ORO (C20-C36)
Qualifier:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 4 of 6
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-8 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR TPHs, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HT16-28
HT 16-29
HT 16-30
HT 16-31
HT 16-32
HT16-33
HBT 15-A
HBT15-B
Sample Name:
HT16-28-SURF
HT16-29-SURF
HT16-30-SURF
HT 16-31-SURF
HT16-32-SURF
HT 16-3 3-SURF
HBT15-A-SURF
HBT15-B-SURF
Sample Date:
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/8/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/8/2016
10/27/2015
10/27/2015
Depth Interval (feet):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
foe
fraction
0.0442
0.00931
0.00581
0.0367
0.0323
0.00512
0.0543
0.00776
Diesel Range Organics (CIO - C28)
mg/kg
570
260
720
830
400
1300
220
53
DRO Sample-Specific Risk Screening Level
mg/kg
245
52
32
203
179
28
301
43
Oil Range Organics (C20-C36)
mg/kg
830
340
690
1200
760
1400
1500
310
ORO Sample-Specific Risk Screening Level
mg/kg
437
92
57
363
319
51
537
77
I TPH
mg/kg
1400
600
1410
2030
1160
2700
1720
363
NOTES:
- Sediment benchmark for DRO used in calculation of sample-
specific risk screening level is 5543 mg/kg
- Sediment benchmark for ORO used in calculation of sample-
specific risk screening level is 9883 mg/kg
Bolded detected values exceed the Sample-Specific Risk Screening
Level
DRO = Diesel range organics.
FD = Field duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown.
mg/kg = Milligram(s) per kilogram.
ORO = Oil range organics.
TPH = Total petroleum hydrocarbons.
I TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
I TPH = DRO (C10-C20) + ORO (C20-C36)
Qualifier:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 5 of 6
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-8 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR TPHs, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HBT15-C
Sample Name:
HBT15-C-SURF
Sample Date:
10/30/2015
Depth Interval (feet):
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
foe
fraction
0.0045
Diesel Range Organics (CIO - C28)
mg/kg
23
DRO Sample-Specific Risk Screening Level
mg/kg
25
Oil Range Organics (C20-C36)
mg/kg
180
ORO Sample-Specific Risk Screening Level
mg/kg
44
I TPH
mg/kg
203
NOTES:
- Sediment benchmark for DRO used in calculation of sample-
specific risk screening level is 5543 mg/kg
- Sediment benchmark for ORO used in calculation of sample-
specific risk screening level is 9883 mg/kg
Bolded detected values exceed the Sample-Specific Risk Screening
Level
DRO = Diesel range organics.
FD = Field duplicate.
HBT and HT = Harbortown.
mg/kg = Milligram(s) per kilogram.
ORO = Oil range organics.
TPH = Total petroleum hydrocarbons.
£ TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
I TPH = DRO (C10-C20) + ORO (C20-C36)
Qualifier:
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 6 of 6
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT16-01
HT16-01
HT16-01
HT16-01-SURF
HT16-01-0010
HT16-01-1030
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
Coc, PAHi, FCVf
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g oc
Hg/g oc
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
—
—
2.12
0.0212
—
—
1.4
0.014
—
—
0.218
0.00218
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methy lnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.14
6.60
6.60
0.01
0.02
1.71
1.71
0.00
0.01
5.05
5.05
0.01
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.22
10.38
10.38
0.02
0.04
2.50
2.50
0.006
0.01
5.50
5.50
0.01
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.06
2.88
2.88
0.006
0.02
1.43
1.43
0.00
0.00
1.79
1.79
0.00
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.06
2.88
2.88
0.006
0.01
0.93
0.93
0.002
0.00
0.39
0.39
0.001
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.06
2.88
2.88
0.00
0.02
1.14
1.14
0.00
0.01
2.84
2.84
0.00
Benzo falanthracene
841
4,153
0.06
2.88
2.88
0.00
0.04
2.79
2.79
0.00
0.00
1.79
1.79
0.00
Benzofalpyrene
965
3,840
0.06
2.88
2.88
0.00
0.04
2.57
2.57
0.00
0.00
1.33
1.33
0.00
Benzofblfluoranthene
979
2,169
0.08
3.73
3.73
0.00
0.04
2.93
2.93
0.00
0.01
2.52
2.52
0.00
Benzofelpyrene
967
4,300
0.06
2.88
2.88
0.00
0.03
2.36
2.36
0.00
0.01
3.30
3.30
0.00
Benzo fg,h,ilpery lene
1,095
648
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
2.36
2.36
0.00
0.02
6.88
6.88
0.01
Benzofklfluoranthene
981
1,220
0.08
3.54
3.54
0.00
0.04
2.86
2.86
0.00
0.00
0.96
0.96
0.00
Cl-Chrysenes
929
—
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
2.00
2.00
0.00
0.02
9.17
9.17
0.01
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
—
0.10
4.48
4.48
0.01
0.08
5.36
5.36
0.01
0.03
15.14
15.14
0.02
Cl-Fluorenes
611
—
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
2.61
2.61
0.00
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
—
0.25
11.79
11.79
0.03
0.04
2.86
2.86
0.01
0.02
7.34
7.34
0.02
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
—
0.08
3.68
3.68
0.01
0.07
5.29
5.29
0.01
0.04
16.51
16.51
0.02
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
—
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
1.71
1.71
0.00
0.02
9.17
9.17
0.01
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
—
—
0.09
4.10
4.10
—
0.05
3.71
3.71
—
0.05
21.10
21.10
—
C2-Fluorenes
686
—
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
4.59
4.59
0.01
C2-Naphthalenes
510
—
0.22
10.38
10.38
0.02
0.09
6.21
6.21
0.01
0.06
28.44
28.44
0.06
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
-
0.09
4.01
4.01
0.01
0.06
4.00
4.00
0.01
0.04
19.72
19.72
0.03
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
-
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.93
0.93
0.00
0.02
7.80
7.80
0.01
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.06
3.02
3.02
0.00
0.02
1.64
1.64
0.00
0.03
15.14
15.14
0.02
C3-Fluorenes
769
—
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
1.00
1.00
0.00
0.01
5.50
5.50
0.01
C3-Naphthalenes
581
—
0.21
9.91
9.91
0.02
0.10
7.14
7.14
0.01
0.14
64.22
64.22
0.11
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
—
0.15
7.08
7.08
0.01
0.06
4.07
4.07
0.00
0.07
31.65
31.65
0.04
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
—
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
—
0.13
6.13
6.13
0.01
0.06
4.21
4.21
0.01
0.09
40.83
40.83
0.06
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
—
0.07
3.40
3.40
0.00
0.04
2.57
2.57
0.00
0.05
22.94
22.94
0.03
Chrysene
844
826
0.09
4.43
4.43
0.01
0.06
4.36
4.36
0.01
0.02
7.80
7.80
0.01
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.02
0.80
0.80
0.00
0.01
0.60
0.60
0.00
0.00
0.92
0.92
0.00
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.13
6.13
6.13
0.01
0.08
6
6
0.01
0.01
2.66
2.66
0.00
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.06
2.88
2.88
0.005
0.03
1.86
1.86
0.00
0.00
2.11
2.11
0.00
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
—
0.06
2.88
2.88
0.00
0.03
1.86
1.86
0.00
0.00
1.01
1.01
0.00
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.83
39.15
39.15
0.102
0.05
3.57
3.57
0.01
0.01
4.13
4.13
0.01
Perylene
967
431
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
2.64
2.64
0.00
0.01
4.17
4.17
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.08
3.96
3.96
0.01
0.08
5.50
5.50
0.01
0.02
7.80
7.80
0.01
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.14
6.60
6.60
0.01
0.10
7
7
0.01
0.02
9.17
9.17
0.01
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
0.28
...
...
...
0.15
...
...
...
0.51
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the maximum
COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA,
2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
(ig/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT16-02
HT16-02
HT16-02
HT16-02-SURF
HT16-02-0010
HT16-02-1020
6/7/2016
6/9/2016
6/9/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
1-2
Coc, PAHi, FCVf
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g oc
Hg/g oc
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
—
-
1.75
0.0175
—
—
2.14
0.0214
—
—
3.14
0.0314
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methy lnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.03
1.49
1.49
0.00
0.13
6.07
6.07
0.01
0.11
3.50
3.50
0.01
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.02
1.31
1.31
0.00
0.13
6.07
6.07
0.01
0.08
2.61
2.61
0.01
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.10
5.54
5.54
0.01
0.56
26.17
26.17
0.05
0.30
9.55
9.55
0.02
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
1.91
1.91
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.31
17.71
17.71
0.03
1.20
56.07
56.07
0.09
0.88
28.03
28.03
0.05
Benzo falanthracene
841
4,153
0.78
44.57
44.57
0.05
1.70
79
79
0.09
1.70
54
54
0.06
Benzo [alpyrene
965
3,840
0.65
37.14
37.14
0.04
1.40
65
65
0.07
1.60
51
51
0.05
Benzo fb] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.59
33.71
33.71
0.03
1.30
61
61
0.06
1.30
41
41
0.04
Benzo [elpyrene
967
4,300
0.42
24.00
24.00
0.02
0.86
40
40
0.04
1.00
32
32
0.03
Benzo fg,h,i|pery lene
1,095
648
0.35
20.00
20.00
0.02
0.69
32
32
0.03
0.78
25
25
0.02
Benzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.56
32.00
32.00
0.03
1.30
61
61
0.06
1.50
48
48
0.05
Cl-Chrysenes
929
—
0.34
19.43
19.43
0.02
0.39
0
0
0.00
0.63
20
20
0.02
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
—
0.88
50.29
50.29
0.07
1.60
75
75
0.10
1.70
54
54
0.07
Cl-Fluorenes
611
—
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
—
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
—
0.49
28.00
28.00
0.04
1.00
47
47
0.07
1.20
38
38
0.06
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
-
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
—
-
0.43
24.57
24.57
—
0.39
0
0
—
1.00
32
32
—
C2-Fluorenes
686
-
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
—
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
-
0.29
16.57
16.57
0.02
0.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.65
20.70
20.70
0.03
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
-
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
C 3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
-
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
-
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Naphthalenes
581
-
0.12
0
0
0.00
0.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
C 3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
-
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.49
15.61
15.61
0.02
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
-
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
—
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
-
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.78
44.57
44.57
0.05
1.70
79
79
0.09
1.80
57
57
0.07
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.14
8.00
8.00
0.01
0.28
13.08
13.08
0.01
0.30
9.55
9.55
0.01
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
1.70
97
97
0.14
4.60
215
215
0.30
4.50
143
143
0.20
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.12
6.86
6.86
0.01
0.68
31.78
31.78
0.06
0.38
12.10
12.10
0.02
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
—
0.37
21.14
21.14
0.02
0.73
34
34
0.03
0.81
26
26
0.02
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.24
11.21
11.21
0.03
0.09
2.99
2.99
0.01
Perylene
967
431
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
1.10
62.86
62.86
0.11
4.90
229
229
0.38
3.30
105
105
0.18
Pyrene
697
9,090
1.50
86
86
0.12
3.60
168
168
0.24
3.60
115
115
0.16
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
0.85
...
...
...
1.83
...
...
...
1.20
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the maximum
COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA,
2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
(ig/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 2 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT16-02
HT16-03
HT16-03
HT16-02-2030
HT16-03-SURF
HT16-03-0010
6/9/2016
6/8/2016
6/9/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
2-3
0-0.5
0-1
Coc, PAHi, FCVf
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g oc
Hg/g oc
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
ng/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
—
-
2.7
0.027
—
—
0.692
0.00692
—
—
0.922
0.00922
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methy lnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.01
0.41
0.41
0.00
0.00
0
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.01
0.44
0.44
0.00
0.00
0
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.03
1
1
0.00
0.00
0
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.02
0.59
0.59
0.00
0.00
0.14
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.09
3
3
0.01
0.00
1
1
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Benzo falanthracene
841
4,153
0.23
9
9
0.01
0.01
2
2
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.04
0.00
Benzo [alpyrene
965
3,840
0.23
9
9
0.01
0.01
2
2
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Benzo fb] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.26
10
10
0.01
0.02
2
2
0.00
0.00
0.12
0.12
0.00
Benzo [elpyrene
967
4,300
0.18
7
7
0.01
0.01
2
2
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Benzo fg,h,i|pery lene
1,095
648
0.14
5
5
0.00
0.01
2
2
0.00
0.00
0.16
0.16
0.00
Benzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.23
9
9
0.01
0.01
2
2
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.06
0.00
Cl-Chrysenes
929
—
0.21
8
8
0.01
0.01
2
2
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
—
0
15
15
0.02
0
2
2
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Cl-Fluorenes
611
—
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
—
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
—
0.23
9
9
0.01
0.00
0
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
-
0.22
8.15
8.15
0.01
0.01
2
2
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
—
-
0.32
12
12
—
0.01
2
2
—
0.00
0.00
0.00
—
C2-Fluorenes
686
-
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
—
0.07
3
3
0.00
0.01
1
1
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
-
0.28
10
10
0.01
0.02
2
2
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
-
0.16
5.93
5.93
0.01
0.01
1.45
1.45
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C 3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
-
0.19
7.04
7.04
0.01
0.01
1
1
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
-
0.08
2.85
2.85
0.00
0.02
2.31
2.31
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Naphthalenes
581
-
0.16
6
6
0.01
0.02
3
3
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C 3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
-
0.36
13
13
0.02
0.03
4
4
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
-
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
—
0.14
5.19
5.19
0.01
0.01
2
2
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
-
0.29
10.74
10.74
0.01
0.01
1.73
1.73
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.28
10
10
0.01
0.02
3
3
0.00
0.00
0.10
0.10
0.00
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.05
2
2
0.00
0.00
0.46
0.46
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.54
20
20
0.03
0.02
3
3
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.08
0.00
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.03
1
1
0.00
0.00
0
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
—
0.14
5
5
0.00
0.01
1
1
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.05
0.00
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.01
0.52
0.52
0.00
0.00
0.19
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.07
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.11
4
4
0.00
0.01
0.87
0.87
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.29
11
11
0.02
0
3
3
0.00
0.00
0
0
0.00
Pyrene
697
9,090
0
17
17
0.02
0
3
3
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.13
0.00
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
0.28
...
...
...
0.06
...
...
...
0.00
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the maximum
COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA,
2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
(ig/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 3 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT16-03
HT16-04
HT16-04
HT16-03-1030
HT16-04-SURF
HT16-04-SURF-FD
6/9/2016
6/8/2016
6/8/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
1-3
0-0.5
0-0.5
Coc, PAHi, FCVf
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g oc
Hg/g oc
Hg/g dry
wt.
ng/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
—
-
0.567
0.00567
—
—
1.08
0.0108
—
—
1.09
0.0109
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methy lnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.00
0.09
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.36
0.36
0.00
0.00
0.42
0.42
0.00
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.00
0.08
0.08
0.000
0.00
0.31
0.31
0.001
0.00
0.42
0.42
0.00
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.01
0.89
0.89
0.00
0.01
0.61
0.61
0.00
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.01
0.50
0.50
0.001
0.00
0.39
0.39
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
1.94
1.94
0.00
0.02
1.38
1.38
0.00
Benzo falanthracene
841
4,153
0.00
0.13
0.13
0.00
0.06
5.37
5.37
0.01
0.04
3.39
3.39
0.00
Benzo [alpyrene
965
3,840
0.00
0.13
0.13
0.00
0.06
5.46
5.46
0.01
0.04
3.67
3.67
0.00
Benzo fb] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.00
0.34
0.34
0.00
0.07
6.30
6.30
0.01
0.05
4.59
4.59
0.00
Benzo [elpyrene
967
4,300
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
3.98
3.98
0.00
0.04
3.30
3.30
0.00
Benzo fg,h,i|pery lene
1,095
648
0.00
0.35
0.35
0.00
0.04
3.61
3.61
0.00
0.03
3.12
3.12
0.00
Benzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.00
0.13
0.13
0.00
0.05
4.81
4.81
0.00
0.04
3.76
3.76
0.00
Cl-Chrysenes
929
—
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
2.87
2.87
0.00
0.03
3.03
3.03
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
—
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
6.57
6.57
0.01
0.06
5
5
0.01
Cl-Fluorenes
611
—
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
—
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
—
0.01
1.08
1.08
0.00
0.04
3.98
3.98
0.01
0.04
4
4
0.01
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
-
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.03
2.78
2.78
0.00
0.03
3.12
3.12
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
—
-
0.01
1.01
1.01
—
0.05
4.63
4.63
—
0.05
4.13
4.13
—
C2-Fluorenes
686
-
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
1.39
1.39
0.00
0.01
1.19
1.19
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
—
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
1.94
1.94
0.00
0.02
2
2
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
-
0.01
1.11
1.11
0.00
0.04
4
4
0.00
0.05
5
5
0.01
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
-
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
2.59
2.59
0.00
0.03
2.48
2.48
0.00
C 3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
-
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
2.87
2.87
0.00
0.03
2.57
2.57
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
-
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
1.39
1.39
0.00
0.02
2.02
2.02
0.00
C3-Naphthalenes
581
-
0.01
0.90
0.90
0.00
0.06
5.56
5.56
0.01
0.07
6
6
0.01
C 3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
-
0.01
1.11
1.11
0.00
0.05
4
4
0.01
0.06
6
6
0.01
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
-
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
1.39
1.39
0.00
0.01
1.10
1.10
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
—
0.01
0.99
0.99
0.00
0.04
4.07
4.07
0.01
0.05
4.95
4.95
0.01
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
-
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
1.85
1.85
0.00
0.03
3
3
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.00
0.71
0.71
0.00
0.07
6.48
6.48
0.01
0.06
5.05
5.05
0.01
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.01
1.30
1.30
0.001
0.01
0.92
0.92
0.00
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.00
0.72
0.72
0.00
0.13
12.04
12.04
0.02
0.09
8.35
8.35
0.01
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.01
0.93
0.93
0.00
0.01
0.70
0.70
0.00
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
—
0.00
0.08
0.08
0.00
0.04
3.52
3.52
0.00
0.03
2.75
2.75
0.00
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.00
0.15
0.15
0.000
0.00
0.27
0.27
0.001
0.00
0.43
0.43
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
2.22
2.22
0.00
0.03
2.29
2.29
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.01
1.46
1.46
0.00
0.08
7.69
7.69
0.01
0.05
4
4
0.01
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.00
0.62
0.62
0.00
0.12
11.11
11.11
0.02
0.08
7.52
7.52
0.01
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
0.01
...
...
...
0.16
...
...
...
0.13
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the maximum
COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA,
2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
(ig/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 4 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT16-04
HT16-05
HT16-05
HT16-04-0010
HT16-05-SURF
HT16-05-0010
6/10/2016
6/14/2016
6/15/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
0-1
0-0.5
0-1
Coc, PAHi, FCVf
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g oc
Hg/g oc
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
—
-
0.48
0.0048
—
—
4.89
0.0489
—
—
2.23
0.0223
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methy lnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.00
1
1
0.00
1.10
22.49
22.49
0.05
0.74
33.18
33.18
0.07
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.01
1
1
0.00
0.94
19.22
19.22
0.04
1.00
44.84
44.84
0.10
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.00
0
0
0.00
2.00
40.90
40.90
0.08
1.70
76
76
0.16
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.00
0.07
0.07
0.00
0.37
7.57
7.57
0.02
1.00
44.84
44.84
0.10
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.00
0
0
0.00
3.30
67.48
67.48
0.11
2.90
130
130
0.22
Benzo falanthracene
841
4,153
0.00
0
0
0.00
7.10
145.19
145.19
0.17
5.80
260
260
0.31
Benzo [alpyrene
965
3,840
0.00
0
0
0.00
5.90
120.65
120.65
0.13
4.70
211
211
0.22
Benzo fb] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.00
1
1
0.00
5.90
120.65
120.65
0.12
4.10
184
184
0.19
Benzo [elpyrene
967
4,300
0.01
1
1
0.00
3.80
77.71
77.71
0.08
3.10
139
139
0.14
Benzo fg,h,i|pery lene
1,095
648
0.01
1.88
1.88
0.00
2.80
57.26
57.26
0.05
1.80
81
81
0.07
Benzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.00
0
0
0.00
6.00
122.70
122.70
0.13
5.20
233
233
0.24
Cl-Chrysenes
929
—
0.01
2
2
0.00
3.80
77.71
77.71
0.08
2.50
112
112
0.12
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
—
0.01
2
2
0.00
9.40
192.23
192.23
0.25
8.30
372
372
0.48
Cl-Fluorenes
611
—
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
—
0.01
1
1
0.00
0.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
—
0.02
4
4
0.01
5.90
120.65
120.65
0.18
4.60
206
206
0.31
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
-
0.01
3
3
0.00
2.80
57.26
57.26
0.06
1.40
62.78
62.78
0.06
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
—
-
0.02
3
3
—
4.50
92.02
92.02
—
5.00
224
224
—
C2-Fluorenes
686
-
0.00
0.92
0.92
0.00
0.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
—
0.02
4
4
0.01
6.40
130.88
130.88
0.26
5.10
228.70
228.70
0.45
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
-
0.03
6
6
0.01
4.60
94.07
94.07
0.13
3.70
166
166
0.22
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
-
0.01
2.50
2.50
0.00
1.70
34.76
34.76
0.03
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C 3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
-
0.02
3.33
3.33
0.00
2.20
44.99
44.99
0.05
1.50
67.26
67.26
0.07
C3-Fluorenes
769
-
0.01
1.79
1.79
0.00
0.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.10
49.33
49.33
0.06
C3-Naphthalenes
581
-
0.03
7
7
0.01
6.70
137.01
137.01
0.24
5.20
233.18
233.18
0.40
C 3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
-
0.04
9
9
0.01
5.70
116.56
116.56
0.14
4.70
210.76
210.76
0.25
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
-
0.00
0.96
0.96
0.00
0.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
—
0.02
5
5
0.01
2.30
47.03
47.03
0.07
2.00
89.69
89.69
0.14
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
-
0.01
3
3
0.00
2.90
59.30
59.30
0.06
2.30
103.14
103.14
0.11
Chrysene
844
826
0.01
2
2
0.00
8.10
165.64
165.64
0.20
6.80
305
305
0.36
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.00
0.15
0.15
0.00
1.10
22.49
22.49
0.020
0.92
41.26
41.26
0.04
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.00
1
1
0.00
14.00
286.30
286.30
0.40
14.00
628
628
0.89
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.00
0
0
0.00
2.50
51.12
51.12
0.10
2.10
94
94
0.18
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
—
0.00
0.31
0.31
0.00
3.00
61.35
61.35
0.06
2.50
112
112
0.10
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.01
1.98
1.98
0.01
1.10
22.49
22.49
0.06
1.10
49
49
0.13
Perylene
967
431
0.00
0.79
0.79
0.00
0.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.20
53.81
53.81
0.06
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.02
3
3
0.01
11.00
224.95
224.95
0.38
13.00
583
583
0.98
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.01
2
2
0.00
15.00
306.75
306.75
0.44
14.00
628
628
0.90
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
0.10
...
...
...
4.08
...
...
...
7.89
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the maximum
COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA,
2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
(ig/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 5 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT16-05
HT16-05
HT16-05
HT16-05-1020
HT16-05-1020-FD
HT16-05-2040
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
1-2
1-2
2-4
Coc, PAHi, FCVf
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g oc
Hg/g oc
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
—
-
1.52
0.0152
—
—
1.44
0.0144
—
—
0.816
0.00816
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methy lnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.10
6.58
6.58
0.01
0.13
9.03
9.03
0.02
0.12
14.71
14.71
0.03
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.14
9.21
9.21
0.02
0.38
26.39
26.39
0.06
0.22
26.96
26.96
0.06
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.13
8.55
8.55
0.02
0.38
26.39
26.39
0.05
0.10
12.25
12.25
0.02
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.10
6.25
6.25
0.01
0.38
26.39
26.39
0.06
0.10
12.25
12.25
0.03
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.22
14
14
0.02
0.77
53
53
0.09
0.10
12
12
0.02
Benzo falanthracene
841
4,153
0.40
26
26
0.03
1.40
97
97
0.12
0.10
12
12
0.01
Benzo [alpyrene
965
3,840
0.32
21
21
0.02
1.10
76
76
0.08
0.10
12
12
0.01
Benzo fb] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.28
18
18
0.02
1.00
69
69
0.07
0.02
2
2
0.00
Benzo [elpyrene
967
4,300
0.21
14
14
0.01
0.68
47
47
0.05
0.05
0
0
0.00
Benzo fg,h,i|pery lene
1,095
648
0.14
9
9
0.01
0.44
31
31
0.03
0.05
0
0
0.00
Benzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.35
23
23
0.02
0.89
62
62
0.06
0.02
2
2
0.00
Cl-Chrysenes
929
—
0.20
13
13
0.01
0.54
38
38
0.04
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
—
0.50
33
33
0.04
1.50
104
104
0.14
0.05
0
0
0.00
Cl-Fluorenes
611
—
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
—
0.17
11.18
11.18
0.03
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.24
29.41
29.41
0.07
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
—
0.35
23
23
0.03
1.10
76
76
0.11
0.05
0
0
0.00
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
-
0.11
7
7
0.01
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
—
-
0.24
16
16
—
0.56
39
39
—
0.05
0
0
—
C2-Fluorenes
686
-
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
—
0.45
30
30
0.06
0.62
43.06
43.06
0.08
0.17
20.83
20.83
0.04
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
-
0.26
17
17
0.02
0.64
44
44
0.06
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
-
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
C 3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
-
0.13
9
9
0.01
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
-
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Naphthalenes
581
-
0.42
28
28
0.05
0.70
48.61
48.61
0.08
0.18
22.06
22.06
0.04
C 3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
-
0.29
19
19
0.02
0.60
41.67
41.67
0.05
0.11
13.48
13.48
0.02
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
-
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
—
0.17
11
11
0.02
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.13
15.93
15.93
0.02
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
-
0.15
10
10
0.01
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.45
30
30
0.04
1.40
97
97
0.12
0.10
12
12
0.01
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.06
4.01
4.01
0.00
0.20
13.89
13.89
0.01
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.95
63
63
0.09
2.90
201
201
0.28
0.10
12
12
0.02
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.16
11
11
0.02
0.38
26.39
26.39
0.05
0.10
12.25
12.25
0.02
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
—
0.16
11
11
0.01
0.56
39
39
0.03
0.10
12.25
12.25
0.01
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.52
34.21
34.21
0.09
0.68
47.22
47.22
0.12
1.30
159.31
159.31
0.41
Perylene
967
431
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.88
58
58
0.10
2.40
167
167
0.28
0.10
12
12
0.02
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.88
58
58
0.08
3.00
208
208
0.30
0.10
12
12
0.02
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
0.91
...
...
...
2.37
...
...
...
0.81
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the maximum
COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA,
2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
(ig/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 6 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT16-06
HT16-06
HT16-06
HT16-06-SURF
HT16-06-0010
HT16-06-1030
6/14/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
Coc, PAHi, FCVf
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g oc
Hg/g oc
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
—
-
0.179
0.00179
—
—
0.16
0.0016
—
—
0.595
0.00595
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methy lnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.76
424.58
424.58
0.952
0.01
5.19
5.19
0.01
0.01
1.50
1.50
0.00
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.87
486.03
486.03
1.087
0.04
22.50
22.50
0.05
0.01
1.51
1.51
0.00
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
2.900
1620.11
1620.11
3.300
0.04
22.50
22.50
0.05
0.00
0.67
0.67
0.00
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.160
89.39
89.39
0.1978
0.03
16.25
16.25
0.04
0.00
0.29
0.29
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
5.10
2849.16
1300.00
2.189
0.07
45.00
45.00
0.08
0.01
2
2
0.00
Benzo falanthracene
841
4,153
9.90
5530.73
4153.00
4.938
0.22
137.50
137.50
0.16
0.01
1
1
0.00
Benzo [alpyrene
965
3,840
8.60
4804.47
3840.00
3.979
0.16
100.00
100.00
0.10
0.01
1
1
0.00
Benzo fb] fluoranthene
979
2,169
7.90
4413.41
2169.00
2.216
0.15
93.75
93.75
0.10
0.01
2
2
0.00
Benzo [elpyrene
967
4,300
5.20
2905.03
2905.03
3.004
0.10
59.38
59.38
0.06
0.01
1
1
0.00
Benzo fg,h,i|pery lene
1,095
648
4.50
2513.97
648.00
0.592
0.09
54.38
54.38
0.05
0.02
3
3
0.00
Benzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
7.20
4022.35
1220.00
1.244
0.15
93.75
93.75
0.10
0.01
1
1
0.00
Cl-Chrysenes
929
—
4.40
2458.10
2458.10
2.646
0.10
62.50
62.50
0.07
0.00
0
0
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
—
8.70
4860.34
4860.34
6.312
0.38
238
238
0.31
0.01
2
2
0.00
Cl-Fluorenes
611
—
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
—
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
1.06
1.06
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
—
4.40
2458.10
2458.10
3.669
0.15
93.75
93.75
0.14
0.03
4
4
0.01
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
-
1.70
949.72
949.72
0.942
0.05
29.38
29.38
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
—
-
3.80
2122.91
2122.91
—
0.18
112.50
112.50
—
0.01
1
1
—
C2-Fluorenes
686
-
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
—
1.90
1061.45
1061.45
2.081
0.04
27.50
27.50
0.05
0.01
1.55
1.55
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
-
1.60
893.85
893.85
1.198
0.11
68.75
68.75
0.09
0.02
3
3
0.00
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
-
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C 3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
-
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.06
38.13
38.13
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
-
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Naphthalenes
581
-
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.08
47.50
47.50
0.08
0.02
2.86
2.86
0.00
C 3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
-
1.40
782.12
782.12
0.943
0.09
55.63
55.63
0.07
0.01
1.55
1.55
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
-
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.0000
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
—
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
24.38
24.38
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
-
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.04
24.38
24.38
0.03
0.01
1.08
1.08
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
10.00
5586.59
826.00
0.979
0.22
137.50
137.50
0.16
0.02
3
3
0.00
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
1.800
1005.59
1005.59
0.8954
0.03
18.13
18.13
0.02
0.00
0
0
0.00
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
19.00
10614.53
10614.53
15.013
0.41
256
256
0.36
0.02
4
4
0.01
Fluorene
538
26,000
3.30
1843.58
1843.58
3.427
0.04
22.50
22.50
0.04
0.01
0.84
0.84
0.00
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
—
4.70
2625.70
2625.70
2.3549
0.08
52.50
52.50
0.05
0.00
1
1
0.00
Naphthalene
385
61,700
2.700
1508.38
1508.38
3.918
0.04
22.50
22.50
0.06
0.01
1.24
1.24
0.00
Perylene
967
431
2.20
1229.05
431.00
0.446
0.04
24.38
24.38
0.03
0.01
1.53
1.53
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
17.00
9497.21
9497.21
15.935
0.17
106.25
106.25
0.18
0.03
4
4
0.01
Pyrene
697
9,090
19.00
10614.53
9090.00
13.042
0.41
256
256
0.37
0.02
4
4
0.01
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
95.46
...
...
...
2.93
...
...
...
0.07
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the maximum
COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA,
2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
(ig/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 7 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT16-07
HT16-07
HT16-07
HT16-07-SURF
HT16-07-0010
HT16-07-1025
6/14/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
1-2.5
Coc, PAHi, FCVf
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g oc
Hg/g oc
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
—
-
0.89
0.0089
—
—
6
0.06
—
—
1.19
0.0119
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methy lnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.84
94.38
94.38
0.21
140.00
2333.33
2333.33
5.23
4.70
394.96
394.96
0.89
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.86
96.63
96.63
0.22
200.00
3333.33
3333.33
7.46
7.30
613.45
613.45
1.37
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
2.000
224.72
224.72
0.458
98.00
1633.33
1633.33
3.33
2.00
168.07
168.07
0.34
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
3.200
359.55
359.55
0.795
200.00
3333.33
3333.33
7.37
7.80
655.46
655.46
1.45
Anthracene
594
1,300
8.00
898.88
898.88
1.51
98.00
1633.33
1300.00
2.19
2.20
184.87
184.87
0.31
Benzo falanthracene
841
4,153
11.00
1235.96
1235.96
1.47
98.00
1633
1633
1.94
2.10
176.47
176.47
0.21
Benzo [alpyrene
965
3,840
11.00
1235.96
1235.96
1.28
98.00
1633
1633
1.69
2.00
168.07
168.07
0.17
Benzo fb] fluoranthene
979
2,169
7.70
865.17
865.17
0.88
30.00
500.00
500.00
0.51
1.00
84.03
84.03
0.09
Benzo [elpyrene
967
4,300
6.80
764.04
764.04
0.79
49.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Benzo fg,h,i|pery lene
1,095
648
5.80
651.69
648.00
0.59
49.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.00
168.07
168.07
0.15
Benzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
8.50
955.06
955.06
0.97
49.00
817
817
0.83
1.30
109.24
109.24
0.11
Cl-Chrysenes
929
—
6.00
674.16
674.16
0.73
49.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
—
18.00
2022.47
2022.47
2.63
150.00
2500
2500
3.25
3.40
285.71
285.71
0.37
Cl-Fluorenes
611
—
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
49.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
—
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
220.00
3666.67
3666.67
8.26
8.10
680.67
680.67
1.53
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
—
9.90
1112.36
1112.36
1.66
140.00
2333.33
2333.33
3.48
3.70
310.92
310.92
0.46
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
-
3.40
382.02
382.02
0.38
49.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
—
-
7.10
797.75
797.75
—
49.00
0.00
0.00
—
1.00
0.00
0.00
—
C2-Fluorenes
686
-
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
49.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
—
4.50
505.62
505.62
0.99
200.00
3333.33
3333.33
6.54
5.70
478.99
478.99
0.94
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
-
5.20
584.27
584.27
0.78
49.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
-
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.000
49.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
C 3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
-
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
49.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
C3-Fluorenes
769
-
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.000
49.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
C3-Naphthalenes
581
-
3.80
426.97
426.97
0.73
49.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C 3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
-
3.10
348.31
348.31
0.42
49.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
-
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.000
49.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
C4-Naphthalenes
657
—
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
49.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
-
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
49.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
13.00
1460.67
826.00
0.979
98.00
1633
826
0.98
2.00
168.07
168.07
0.20
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
1.500
168.54
168.54
0.1501
49.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.20
16.81
16.81
0.015
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
19.00
2134.83
2134.83
3.02
160.00
2667
2667
3.77
4.90
411.76
411.76
0.58
Fluorene
538
26,000
3.500
393.26
393.26
0.731
150.00
2500.00
2500.00
4.65
5.10
428.57
428.57
0.797
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
—
5.20
584.27
584.27
0.524
98.00
1633.33
1633.33
1.46
2.00
168.07
168.07
0.151
Naphthalene
385
61,700
2.100
235.96
235.96
0.613
570.00
9500.00
9500.00
24.68
30.00
2521.01
2521.01
6.548
Perylene
967
431
2.80
314.61
314.61
0.325
49.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
10.00
1123.60
1123.60
1.885
400.00
6667
6667
11.19
13.00
1092.44
1092.44
1.83
Pyrene
697
9,090
24.00
2696.63
2696.63
3.87
280.00
4667
4667
6.70
7.20
605.04
605.04
0.87
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
29.17
...
...
...
92.81
...
...
...
17.14
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the maximum
COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA,
2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
(ig/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 8 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT16-07
HT16-07
HT16-07
HT16-07-1025-FD
HT16-07-2540
HT16-07-4060
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
1-2.5
2.5-4
4-6
Coc, PAHi, FCVf
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g oc
Hg/g oc
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
—
-
1.11
0.0111
—
—
1.99
0.0199
—
—
1.8
0.018
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methy lnaphthalene
446
165,700
7.30
657.66
657.66
1.47
120.00
6030.15
6030.15
13.52
3.60
200.00
200.00
0.45
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
11.000
990.99
990.99
2.217
170.00
8542.71
8542.71
19.11
5.20
288.89
288.89
0.65
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
4.000
360.36
360.36
0.7339
38.00
1909.55
1909.55
3.89
2.00
111.11
111.11
0.23
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
12.000
1081.08
1081.08
2.3918
230.00
11557.79
11557.79
25.57
5.70
316.67
316.67
0.70
Anthracene
594
1,300
4.000
360.36
360.36
0.607
88.00
4422.11
1300.00
2.19
2.10
116.67
116.67
0.20
Benzo falanthracene
841
4,153
4.00
360.36
360.36
0.43
97.00
4874
4153
4.94
2.20
122.22
122.22
0.15
Benzo [alpyrene
965
3,840
4.000
360.36
360.36
0.3734
89.00
4472
3840
3.98
2.00
111.11
111.11
0.12
Benzo fb] fluoranthene
979
2,169
1.50
135.14
135.14
0.14
42.00
2111
2111
2.16
0.92
51.11
51.11
0.05
Benzo [elpyrene
967
4,300
2.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
45.00
2261
2261
2.34
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Benzo fg,h,i|pery lene
1,095
648
2.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
38.00
1910
648
0.59
2.00
111.11
111.11
0.10
Benzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
2.300
207.21
207.21
0.2112
60.00
3015
1220
1.24
1.40
77.78
77.78
0.08
Cl-Chrysenes
929
—
2.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
19.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
—
5.60
504.50
504.50
0.66
150.00
7538
7538
9.79
3.60
200.00
200.00
0.26
Cl-Fluorenes
611
—
2.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
19.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
—
12.00
1081.08
1081.08
2.43
200.00
10050.25
10050.25
22.64
6.00
333.33
333.33
0.75
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
—
5.60
504.50
504.50
0.75
160.00
8040
8040
12.00
3.90
216.67
216.67
0.32
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
-
2.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
19.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
—
-
2.00
0.00
0.00
—
19.00
0
0
—
1.00
0.00
0.00
—
C2-Fluorenes
686
-
2.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
19.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
—
9.20
828.83
828.83
1.63
180.00
9045.23
9045.23
17.74
5.50
305.56
305.56
0.60
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
-
2.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
43.00
2160.80
2160.80
2.90
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
-
2.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
19.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C 3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
-
2.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
19.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
-
2.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
19.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Naphthalenes
581
-
2.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
52.00
2613.07
2613.07
4.50
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C 3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
-
2.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
19.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
-
2.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
19.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
—
2.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
19.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
-
2.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
19.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
4.00
360.36
360.36
0.427
72.00
3618
826
0.98
2.00
111.11
111.11
0.13
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
2.000
0.00
0.00
0.0000
7.80
391.96
391.96
0.35
0.19
10.56
10.56
0.009
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
7.70
693.69
693.69
0.981
220.00
11055
11055
15.64
4.90
272.22
272.22
0.39
Fluorene
538
26,000
7.600
684.68
684.68
1.273
170.00
8542.71
8542.71
15.88
4.30
238.89
238.89
0.444
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
—
4.000
360.36
360.36
0.3232
38.00
1910
1910
1.71
2.00
111.11
111.11
0.10
Naphthalene
385
61,700
37.000
3333.33
3333.33
8.658
400.00
20100.50
20100.50
52.21
15.00
833.33
833.33
2.165
Perylene
967
431
2.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
19.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
19.00
1711.71
1711.71
2.872
520.00
26131
26131
43.84
12.00
666.67
666.67
1.12
Pyrene
697
9,090
12.00
1081.08
1081.08
1.551
330.00
16583
9090
13.04
7.90
438.89
438.89
0.63
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
26.44
...
...
...
260.10
...
...
...
8.53
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the maximum
COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA,
2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
(ig/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 9 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT16-08
HT16-08
HT16-08
HT16-08-SURF
HT16-08-0010
HT16-08-1030
6/13/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
Coc, PAHi, FCVf
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g oc
Hg/g oc
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
—
-
0.362
0.00362
—
—
1.47
0.0147
—
—
1.19
0.0119
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methy lnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.22
60.77
60.77
0.14
0.06
3.81
3.81
0.01
0.06
5.04
5.04
0.01
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.30
82.87
82.87
0.185
0.06
4.01
4.01
0.009
0.06
5.13
5.13
0.011
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.31
85.64
85.64
0.174
0.06
4.15
4.15
0.008
0.07
5.80
5.80
0.012
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.02
5.52
5.52
0.012
0.00
0.28
0.28
0.00
0.00
0.25
0.25
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.20
55.25
55.25
0.09
0.03
2.18
2.18
0.004
0.03
2.77
2.77
0.005
Benzo falanthracene
841
4,153
0.13
35.91
35.91
0.04
0.03
1.77
1.77
0.00
0.02
1.85
1.85
0.00
Benzo [alpyrene
965
3,840
0.09
25.14
25.14
0.03
0.03
1.84
1.84
0.00
0.02
1.51
1.51
0.00
Benzo fb] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.05
13.81
13.81
0.014
0.02
1.22
1.22
0.001
0.02
1.26
1.26
0.001
Benzo [elpyrene
967
4,300
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
1.29
1.29
0.00
0.01
1.18
1.18
0.00
Benzo fg,h,i|pery lene
1,095
648
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.02
1.36
1.36
0.00
0.01
1.18
1.18
0.00
Benzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.06
17.13
17.13
0.02
0.02
1.36
1.36
0.001
0.02
1.26
1.26
0.001
Cl-Chrysenes
929
—
0.10
27.62
27.62
0.030
0.03
2.24
2.24
0.00
0.03
2.61
2.61
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
—
0.44
121.55
121.55
0.16
0.10
6.80
6.80
0.01
0.09
7.14
7.14
0.01
Cl-Fluorenes
611
—
0.11
30.39
30.39
0.05
0.02
1.02
1.02
0.00
0.01
1.18
1.18
0.00
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
—
0.36
99.45
99.45
0.22
0.08
5.31
5.31
0.01
0.08
6.97
6.97
0.02
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
—
0.50
138.12
138.12
0.21
0.10
6.67
6.67
0.01
0.10
8.15
8.15
0.01
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
-
0.07
18.51
18.51
0.02
0.04
2.79
2.79
0.00
0.02
1.68
1.68
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
—
-
0.15
41.44
41.44
—
0.07
5.03
5.03
—
0.06
5.04
5.04
—
C2-Fluorenes
686
-
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
1.50
1.50
0.00
0.02
1.60
1.60
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
—
0.81
223.76
223.76
0.439
0.16
10.88
10.88
0.02
0.18
15.13
15.13
0.03
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
-
0.20
55.25
55.25
0.074
0.08
5.44
5.44
0.01
0.08
6.39
6.39
0.01
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
-
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
1.29
1.29
0.00
0.02
1.60
1.60
0.00
C 3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
-
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
2.65
2.65
0.00
0.03
2.77
2.77
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
-
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
1.43
1.43
0.00
0.02
1.51
1.51
0.00
C3-Naphthalenes
581
-
0.46
127.07
127.07
0.219
0.16
10.88
10.88
0.02
0.16
13.45
13.45
0.02
C 3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
-
0.17
46.96
46.96
0.057
0.12
8.16
8.16
0.01
0.11
9.24
9.24
0.01
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
-
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
—
0.16
44.20
44.20
0.07
0.13
8.84
8.84
0.01
0.10
8.40
8.40
0.01
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
-
0.07
20.44
20.44
0.02
0.07
4.42
4.42
0.00
0.07
5.88
5.88
0.01
Chrysene
844
826
0.13
35.91
35.91
0.04
0.04
2.38
2.38
0.00
0.03
2.69
2.69
0.00
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.01
3.04
3.04
0.003
0.00
0.30
0.30
0.000
0.00
0.28
0.28
0.000
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.28
77.35
77.35
0.11
0.05
3.47
3.47
0.00
0.05
3.78
3.78
0.01
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.18
49.72
49.72
0.092
0.03
2.31
2.31
0.004
0.04
3.11
3.11
0.006
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
—
0.07
18.23
18.23
0.016
0.01
0.68
0.68
0.001
0.01
0.82
0.82
0.001
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.17
46.96
46.96
0.12
0.07
4.42
4.42
0.01
0.06
4.62
4.62
0.01
Perylene
967
431
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.82
0.82
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.59
162.98
162.98
0.27
0.09
6.05
6.05
0.01
0.09
7.65
7.65
0.01
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.48
132.60
132.60
0.19
0.09
6.26
6.26
0.01
0.08
6.81
6.81
0.01
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
2.79
...
...
...
0.18
...
...
...
0.22
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the maximum
COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA,
2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
(ig/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 10 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HT16-08
Sample Name:
HT16-08-1030-FD
Sample Date:
6/14/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
1-3
Coc, PAHi, FCVf
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/g oc
Hg/g oc
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
—
-
0.75
0.0075
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methy lnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.03
4.53
4.53
0.01
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.03
4.53
4.53
0.010
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.03
4.53
4.53
0.009
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.00
0.16
0.16
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.02
2.27
2.27
0.004
Benzo falanthracene
841
4,153
0.01
1.33
1.33
0.00
Benzo [alpyrene
965
3,840
0.01
1.08
1.08
0.00
Benzo fb] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.01
1.12
1.12
0.001
Benzo [elpyrene
967
4,300
0.01
1.08
1.08
0.00
Benzo fg,h,i|pery lene
1,095
648
0.01
1.32
1.32
0.00
Benzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.00
0.64
0.64
0.001
Cl-Chrysenes
929
—
0.02
2.53
2.53
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
—
0.04
5.20
5.20
0.01
Cl-Fluorenes
611
—
0.01
1.21
1.21
0.00
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
—
0.05
6.27
6.27
0.01
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
—
0.07
8.67
8.67
0.01
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
-
0.02
3.07
3.07
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
—
-
0.04
5.20
5.20
—
C2-Fluorenes
686
-
0.01
1.73
1.73
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
—
0.10
12.93
12.93
0.03
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
-
0.06
7.47
7.47
0.01
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
-
0.02
3.20
3.20
0.00
C 3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
-
0.03
3.87
3.87
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
-
0.02
2.40
2.40
0.00
C3-Naphthalenes
581
-
0.14
18.67
18.67
0.03
C 3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
-
0.10
13.33
13.33
0.02
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
-
0.01
1.73
1.73
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
—
0.10
13.33
13.33
0.02
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
-
0.05
6.00
6.00
0.01
Chrysene
844
826
0.02
2.40
2.40
0.00
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.00
0.25
0.25
0.000
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.03
3.47
3.47
0.00
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.02
2.40
2.40
0.004
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
—
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.03
4.40
4.40
0.01
Perylene
967
431
0.01
1.08
1.08
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.05
7.07
7.07
0.01
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.04
5.47
5.47
0.01
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
0.23
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the maximum
COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA,
2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
(ig/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 11 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT16-09
HT16-09
HT16-09
HT16-09-SURF
HT16-09-0010
HT16-09-1030
6/13/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
Coc, PAHi, FCVf
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g oc
Hg/g oc
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
—
-
2.95
0.0295
—
—
1.2
0.012
—
—
0.968
0.00968
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methy lnaphthalene
446
165,700
4.30
145.76
145.76
0.33
0.65
54.17
54.17
0.12
0.04
3.72
3.72
0.01
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
2.10
71.19
71.19
0.16
0.52
43.33
43.33
0.10
0.04
4.44
4.44
0.01
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
8.90
301.69
301.69
0.614
1.90
158.33
158.33
0.32
0.04
4.24
4.24
0.01
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.99
33.56
33.56
0.074
0.45
37.50
37.50
0.083
0.00
0.46
0.46
0.001
Anthracene
594
1,300
4.50
152.54
152.54
0.26
2.30
191.67
191.67
0.32
0.02
1.96
1.96
0.00
Benzo falanthracene
841
4,153
6.90
234
234
0.28
4.20
350.00
350.00
0.42
0.03
3.00
3.00
0.00
Benzofalpyrene
965
3,840
8.00
271
271
0.28
3.80
316.67
316.67
0.33
0.03
3
3
0.00
Benzofblfluoranthene
979
2,169
4.80
163
163
0.17
2.70
225.00
225.00
0.23
0.02
2
2
0.00
Benzofelpyrene
967
4,300
4.70
159.32
159.32
0.16
2.10
175.00
175.00
0.18
0.02
2
2
0.00
Benzo fg,h,ilpery lene
1,095
648
2.80
94.92
94.92
0.09
1.30
108.33
108.33
0.10
0.03
2.79
2.79
0.00
Benzofklfluoranthene
981
1,220
5.60
190
190
0.19
3.00
250.00
250.00
0.25
0.02
1.65
1.65
0.00
Cl-Chrysenes
929
-
4.60
155.93
155.93
0.17
2.30
191.67
191.67
0.21
0.03
3.41
3.41
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
-
16.00
542
542
0.70
7.00
583.33
583.33
0.76
0.07
7
7
0.01
Cl-Fluorenes
611
-
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.78
65.00
65.00
0.11
0.01
1.14
1.14
0.00
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
-
4.20
142.37
142.37
0.32
0.85
70.83
70.83
0.16
0.05
5.58
5.58
0.01
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
-
9.90
335.59
335.59
0.50
3.80
316.67
316.67
0.47
0.07
7.02
7.02
0.01
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
-
3.00
101.69
101.69
0.10
0.95
79.17
79.17
0.08
0.03
2.58
2.58
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
—
-
5.20
176.27
176.27
—
2.20
183.33
183.33
—
0.05
5.06
5.06
—
C2-Fluorenes
686
-
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.38
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
1.45
1.45
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
—
12.00
406.78
406.78
0.80
2.30
191.67
191.67
0.38
0.11
11.36
11.36
0.02
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
—
4.20
142.37
142.37
0.19
2.10
175.00
175.00
0.23
0.06
6.10
6.10
0.01
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
—
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.38
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
2.89
2.89
0.00
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.38
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
3.72
3.72
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
-
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.38
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
1.76
1.76
0.00
C3-Naphthalenes
581
-
6.40
216.95
216.95
0.37
2.00
166.67
166.67
0.29
0.18
18.60
18.60
0.03
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
-
3.60
122.03
122.03
0.15
1.50
125.00
125.00
0.15
0.10
10.02
10.02
0.01
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
-
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.38
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
1.65
1.65
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
—
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.38
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
11.36
11.36
0.02
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
-
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.38
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
5.48
5.48
0.01
Chrysene
844
826
7.00
237
237
0.28
4.20
350.00
350.00
0.41
0.04
3.82
3.82
0.00
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
1.10
37.29
37.29
0.03
0.48
40.00
40.00
0.04
0.01
0.54
0.54
0.00
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
11.00
373
373
0.53
6.40
533.33
533.33
0.75
0.04
5
5
0.01
Fluorene
538
26,000
4.10
138.98
138.98
0.258
1.20
100.00
100.00
0.19
0.02
2.48
2.48
0.00
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
—
3.20
108.47
108.47
0.10
1.40
116.67
116.67
0.10
0.01
1.24
1.24
0.00
Naphthalene
385
61,700
2.10
71.19
71.19
0.185
0.91
75.83
75.83
0.197
0.05
5.58
5.58
0.01
Perylene
967
431
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.84
70.00
70.00
0.07
0.01
1.24
1.24
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
15.00
508
508
0.85
4.00
333.33
333.33
0.56
0.06
6.30
6.30
0.01
Pyrene
697
9,090
22.00
746
746
1.07
9.80
816.67
816.67
1.17
0.06
6
6
0.01
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
8.72
...
...
...
8.56
...
...
...
0.23
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the maximum
COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA,
2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
(ig/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 12 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT16-09
HT16-10
HT16-10
HT16-09-1030-FD
HT16-10-0010
HT16-10-1030
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
1-3
0-1
1-3
Coc, PAHi, FCVf
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g oc
Hg/g oc
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
—
—
0.94
0.0094
—
—
0.444
0.00444
—
—
0.91
0.0091
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methy lnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.04
3.72
3.72
0.01
0.22
49.55
49.55
0.11
0.02
1.76
1.76
0.00
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.04
4.15
4.15
0.01
0.18
40.54
40.54
0.09
0.01
2
2
0.00
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.05
5.74
5.74
0.01
0.20
45.05
45.05
0.09
0.01
1
1
0.00
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.01
1.28
1.28
0.00
0.07
16.44
16.44
0.04
0.00
0.18
0.18
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.04
4.26
4.26
0.01
1.00
225.23
225.23
0.38
0.01
1
1
0.00
Benzo falanthracene
841
4,153
0.10
10.32
10.32
0.01
1.00
225.23
225.23
0.27
0.01
1
1
0.00
Benzofalpyrene
965
3,840
0.10
10.11
10.11
0.01
0.85
191.44
191.44
0.20
0.01
1
1
0.00
Benzofblfluoranthene
979
2,169
0.06
6.81
6.81
0.01
0.59
132.88
132.88
0.14
0.01
1
1
0.00
Benzofelpyrene
967
4,300
0.06
6.17
6.17
0.01
0.49
110.36
110.36
0.11
0.01
1
1
0.00
Benzo fg,h,ilpery lene
1,095
648
0.05
4.89
4.89
0.00
0.35
78.83
78.83
0.07
0.01
1
1
0.00
Benzofklfluoranthene
981
1,220
0.07
7.66
7.66
0.01
0.79
177.93
177.93
0.18
0.01
1
1
0.00
Cl-Chrysenes
929
—
0.08
8.62
8.62
0.01
0.39
87.84
87.84
0.09
0.02
2
2
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
—
0.20
21
21
0.03
1.50
337.84
337.84
0.44
0.04
4
4
0.00
Cl-Fluorenes
611
—
0.02
2.34
2.34
0.00
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.76
0.76
0.00
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
—
0.05
5.32
5.32
0.01
0.28
63.06
63.06
0.14
0.02
2.31
2.31
0.01
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
—
0.10
10.64
10.64
0.02
0.81
182.43
182.43
0.27
0.05
5
5
0.01
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
—
0.05
5.11
5.11
0.01
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
2.20
2.20
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
—
—
0.11
11.70
11.70
—
0.42
94.59
94.59
—
0.03
4
4
—
C2-Fluorenes
686
—
0.02
2.23
2.23
0.00
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
1.43
1.43
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
—
0.14
14.89
14.89
0.03
0.42
94.59
94.59
0.19
0.07
7
7
0.01
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
—
0.10
10.11
10.11
0.01
0.33
74.32
74.32
0.10
0.05
5
5
0.01
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
—
0.04
4.36
4.36
0.00
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
2.86
2.86
0.00
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.06
5.85
5.85
0.01
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
2.97
2.97
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
—
0.02
2.55
2.55
0.00
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
1.76
1.76
0.00
C 3-Naphthalenes
581
—
0.23
24.47
24.47
0.04
0.40
90.09
90.09
0.16
0.15
16.48
16.48
0.03
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
—
0.17
18.09
18.09
0.02
0.30
67.57
67.57
0.08
0.08
9.12
9.12
0.01
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
—
0.02
1.70
1.70
0.00
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
1.43
1.43
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
—
0.13
13.83
13.83
0.02
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.09
10.00
10.00
0.02
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
—
0.09
9.36
9.36
0.01
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
5.49
5.49
0.01
Chrysene
844
826
0.10
10.64
10.64
0.01
1.00
225.23
225.23
0.27
0.02
2
2
0.00
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.01
1.38
1.38
0.00
0.12
27.03
27.03
0.02
0.00
0.23
0.23
0.00
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.11
12
12
0.02
2.00
450
450
0.64
0.02
2
2
0.00
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.04
4.26
4.26
0.01
0.31
69.82
69.82
0.13
0.01
1
1
0.00
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
—
0.04
3.83
3.83
0.00
0.37
83.33
83.33
0.07
0.00
0
0
0.00
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.05
5.11
5.11
0.01
2.40
540.54
540.54
1.40
0.05
6
6
0.01
Perylene
967
431
0.03
2.77
2.77
0.00
0.21
47.30
47.30
0.05
0.01
0.98
0.98
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.09
10
10
0.02
1.70
382.88
382.88
0.64
0.03
4
4
0.01
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.19
20
20
0.03
2.50
563.06
563.06
0.81
0.03
4
4
0.01
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
0.40
...
...
...
6.98
...
...
...
0.16
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the maximum
COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA,
2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
(ig/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 13 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT16-11
HT16-11
HT16-11
HT16-11-SURF
HT16-11-0010
HT16-11-1015
6/10/2016
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
1-1.5
Coc, PAHi, FCVf
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g oc
Hg/g oc
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
—
—
1.04
0.0104
—
—
6.32
0.0632
—
—
6.26
0.0626
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methy lnaphthalene
446
165,700
1.20
115.38
115.38
0.26
220.00
3481.01
3481.01
7.80
300.00
4792
4792
10.75
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.62
59.62
59.62
0.13
290.00
4588.61
4588.61
10.27
440.00
7029
7029
15.72
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
2.20
211.54
211.54
0.431
210.00
3322.78
3322.78
6.77
350.00
5591
5591
11.39
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.46
44.23
44.23
0.10
11.00
174.05
174.05
0.385
14.00
224
224
0.49
Anthracene
594
1,300
2.80
269.23
269.23
0.45
120.00
1898.73
1300.00
2.19
200.00
3195
1300
2.19
Benzo falanthracene
841
4,153
6.40
615.38
615.38
0.73
84.00
1329.11
1329.11
1.58
96.00
1534
1534
1.82
Benzofalpyrene
965
3,840
5.90
567.31
567.31
0.59
65.00
1028.48
1028.48
1.07
73.00
1166
1166
1.21
Benzofblfluoranthene
979
2,169
4.50
432.69
432.69
0.44
38.00
601.27
601.27
0.61
36.00
575
575
0.59
Benzofelpyrene
967
4,300
3.60
346.15
346.15
0.36
36.00
569.62
569.62
0.59
25.50
0
0
0.00
Benzo fg,h,ilpery lene
1,095
648
2.80
269.23
269.23
0.246
25.00
395.57
395.57
0.36
51.00
815
648
0.59
Benzofklfluoranthene
981
1,220
5.50
528.85
528.85
0.54
47.00
743.67
743.67
0.76
49.00
783
783
0.80
Cl-Chrysenes
929
—
2.20
211.54
211.54
0.23
67.00
1060.13
1060.13
1.14
68.00
1086
1086
1.17
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
—
7.80
750.00
750.00
0.97
250.00
3955.70
3955.70
5.14
320.00
5112
5112
6.64
Cl-Fluorenes
611
—
0.90
0.00
0.00
0.00
48.00
759.49
759.49
1.24
62.00
990.42
990.42
1.62
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
—
0.90
0.00
0.00
0.00
390.00
6170.89
6170.89
13.90
510.00
8147
8147
18.35
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
—
4.70
451.92
451.92
0.67
260.00
4113.92
4113.92
6.14
330.00
5272
5272
7.87
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
—
0.90
0.00
0.00
0.00
33.00
522.15
522.15
0.52
25.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
—
—
2.90
278.85
278.85
—
75.00
1186.71
1186.71
—
82.00
1310
1310
—
C2-Fluorenes
686
—
0.90
0.00
0.00
0.00
12.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
25.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
—
3.00
288.46
288.46
0.57
530.00
8386.08
8386.08
16.44
590.00
9425
9425
18.48
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
—
2.30
221.15
221.15
0.30
88.00
1392.41
1392.41
1.87
110.00
1757
1757
2.36
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
—
0.90
0.00
0.00
0.00
12.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
25.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.90
0.00
0.00
0.00
12.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
25.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
—
0.90
0.00
0.00
0.00
12.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
25.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C 3-Naphthalenes
581
—
2.70
259.62
259.62
0.45
200.00
3164.56
3164.56
5.45
220.00
3514
3514
6.05
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
—
2.00
192.31
192.31
0.23
49.00
775.32
775.32
0.94
25.50
0
0
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
—
0.90
0.00
0.00
0.00
12.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
25.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
—
0.90
0.00
0.00
0.00
29.00
458.86
458.86
0.70
25.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
—
0.90
0.00
0.00
0.00
12.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
25.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
6.60
634.62
634.62
0.75
82.00
1297.47
826.00
0.98
97.00
1550
826
0.98
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.93
89.42
89.42
0.080
9.60
151.90
151.90
0.14
8.30
133
133
0.118
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
13.00
1250.00
1250.00
1.77
150.00
2373.42
2373.42
3.36
180.00
2875
2875
4.07
Fluorene
538
26,000
2.20
211.54
211.54
0.39
120.00
1898.73
1898.73
3.53
190.00
3035
3035
5.64
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
—
2.60
250.00
250.00
0.224
25.00
395.57
395.57
0.35
51.00
815
815
0.73
Naphthalene
385
61,700
1.40
134.62
134.62
0.35
300.00
4746.84
4746.84
12.33
580.00
9265
9265
24.07
Perylene
967
431
0.90
0.00
0.00
0.00
12.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
25.50
0
0
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
11.00
1057.69
1057.69
1.77
330.00
5221.52
5221.52
8.76
490.00
7827
7827
13.13
Pyrene
697
9,090
15.00
1442.31
1442.31
2.07
240.00
3797.47
3797.47
5.45
330.00
5272
5272
7.56
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
14.71
...
...
...
102.67
...
...
...
137.91
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the maximum
COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA,
2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
(ig/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 14 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT16-11
HT16-12
HT16-12
HT16-11-1530
HT16-12-SURF
HT16-12-0010
6/13/2016
6/14/2016
6/15/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
1.5-3
0-0.5
0-1
Coc, PAHi, FCVf
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g oc
Hg/g oc
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
—
—
1.15
0.0115
—
—
4.18
0.0418
—
—
7.92
0.0792
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methy lnaphthalene
446
165,700
19.00
0
0
0.00
0.08
1.89
1.89
0.00
120.00
1515.15
1515.15
3.40
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
19.00
0
0
0.000
0.12
2.87
2.87
0.006
180.00
2272.73
2272.73
5.08
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
19.00
0
0
0.000
0.12
2.87
2.87
0.01
130.00
1641.41
1641.41
3.343
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
19.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.12
2.87
2.87
0.006
35.000
441.92
441.92
0.978
Anthracene
594
1,300
19.00
0
0
0.00
0.16
3.83
3.83
0.01
70.00
883.84
883.84
1.488
Benzo falanthracene
841
4,153
19.00
0
0
0.00
0.50
11.96
11.96
0.014
43.00
542.93
542.93
0.646
Benzofalpyrene
965
3,840
19.00
0
0
0.00
0.53
12.68
12.68
0.013
35.00
441.92
441.92
0.458
Benzofblfluoranthene
979
2,169
19.00
0
0
0.00
0.59
14.11
14.11
0.014
16.00
202.02
202.02
0.206
Benzofelpyrene
967
4,300
19.00
0
0
0.00
0.40
9.57
9.57
0.01
17.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
Benzo fg,h,ilpery lene
1,095
648
19.00
0
0
0.00
0.31
7.42
7.42
0.01
35.00
441.92
441.92
0.40
Benzofklfluoranthene
981
1,220
19.00
0
0
0.00
0.45
10.77
10.77
0.011
24.00
303.03
303.03
0.3089
Cl-Chrysenes
929
—
19.00
0
0
0.00
0.28
6.70
6.70
0.007
17.50
0.00
0.00
0.000
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
—
19.00
0
0
0.00
0.75
17.94
17.94
0.02
120.00
1515.15
1515.15
1.97
Cl-Fluorenes
611
—
19.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
17.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
—
19.00
0
0
0.00
0.12
2.87
2.87
0.01
200.00
2525.25
2525.25
5.69
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
—
19.00
0
0
0.00
0.35
8.37
8.37
0.01
120.00
1515.15
1515.15
2.26
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
—
19.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.13
3.11
3.11
0.003
17.50
0.00
0.00
0.000
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
—
—
19.00
0
0
—
0.32
7.66
7.66
—
44.00
555.56
555.56
—
C2-Fluorenes
686
—
19.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
17.50
0.00
0.00
0.000
C2-Naphthalenes
510
—
19.00
0
0
0.00
0.23
5.50
5.50
0.01
260.00
3282.83
3282.83
6.44
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
—
19.00
0
0
0.00
0.26
6.22
6.22
0.01
48.00
606.06
606.06
0.81
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
—
19.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
17.50
0.00
0.00
0.000
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
19.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.12
2.87
2.87
0.003
17.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
—
19.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
17.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C 3-Naphthalenes
581
—
19.00
0
0
0.00
0.21
5.02
5.02
0.01
100.00
1262.63
1262.63
2.17
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
—
19.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.22
5.26
5.26
0.01
35.00
441.92
441.92
0.53
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
—
19.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
17.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
—
19.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
17.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
—
19.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.13
3.11
3.11
0.00
17.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
19.00
0
0
0.00
0.65
15.55
15.55
0.02
46.00
580.81
580.81
0.688
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
19.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.11
2.63
2.63
0.002
3.500
44.19
44.19
0.0394
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
19.00
0
0
0.00
0.93
22.25
22.25
0.03
67.00
845.96
845.96
1.197
Fluorene
538
26,000
19.00
0
0
0.000
0.12
2.87
2.87
0.01
73.00
921.72
921.72
1.713
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
—
19.00
0
0
0.00
0.37
8.85
8.85
0.008
35.000
441.92
441.92
0.3963
Naphthalene
385
61,700
38.00
3304
3304
8.583
0.21
5.02
5.02
0.013
250.00
3156.57
3156.57
8.20
Perylene
967
431
19.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.12
2.87
2.87
0.00
17.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
19.00
0
0
0.00
0.45
10.77
10.77
0.02
190.00
2398.99
2398.99
4.03
Pyrene
697
9,090
19.00
0
0
0.00
1.20
28.71
28.71
0.04
140.00
1767.68
1767.68
2.536
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
8.58
...
...
...
0.32
...
...
...
46.50
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the maximum
COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA,
2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
(ig/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 15 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT16-12
HT16-12
HT16-12
HT16-12-1020
HT16-12-2035
HT16-12-3550
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
1-2
2-3.5
3.5-5
Coc, PAHi, FCVf
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g oc
Hg/g oc
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
—
—
4.39
0.0439
—
—
2.05
0.0205
—
—
0.856
0.00856
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methy lnaphthalene
446
165,700
19
432.80
432.80
0.97
1.30
63.41
63.41
0.14
0.07
7.83
7.83
0.02
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
27
615
615
1.38
2.00
98
98
0.22
0.10
11.10
11.10
0.02
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
7
169
169
0.34
1.30
63
63
0.13
0.04
4.79
4.79
0.01
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
10
226
226
0.50
0.52
25.37
25.37
0.06
0.02
2.34
2.34
0.01
Anthracene
594
1,300
18
410
410
0.69
1.50
73
73
0.12
0.04
4
4
0.01
Benzo falanthracene
841
4,153
11
251
251
0.30
1.80
88
88
0.10
0.03
4
4
0.00
Benzofalpyrene
965
3,840
8
175
175
0.18
1.60
78
78
0.08
0.03
4
4
0.00
Benzofblfluoranthene
979
2,169
4
87
87
0.09
0.94
45.85
45.85
0.05
0.02
2
2
0.00
Benzofelpyrene
967
4,300
4
97.95
97.95
0.10
0.93
45.37
45.37
0.05
0.02
2
2
0.00
Benzo fg,h,ilpery lene
1,095
648
4
82.00
82.00
0.07
1
27.32
27.32
0.02
0.01
0
0
0.00
Benzofklfluoranthene
981
1,220
6
130
130
0.13
1
58.54
58.54
0.06
0.02
2
2
0.00
Cl-Chrysenes
929
—
8
184.51
184.51
0.20
1
58.54
58.54
0.06
0.03
4
4
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
—
28
638
638
0.83
4
175.61
175.61
0.23
0.11
13
13
0.02
Cl-Fluorenes
611
—
6
141.23
141.23
0.23
1
28.78
28.78
0.05
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
—
32
729
729
1.64
2
107.32
107.32
0.24
0.11
12.85
12.85
0.03
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
—
31
706.15
706.15
1.05
3
141.46
141.46
0.21
0.11
13
13
0.02
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
—
2
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
2.45
2.45
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
—
—
10
225.51
225.51
—
1
68.29
68.29
—
0.07
8
8
—
C2-Fluorenes
686
—
5
104.78
104.78
0.15
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
2.57
2.57
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
—
46
1047.84
1047.84
2.05
4
175.61
175.61
0.34
0.17
19.86
19.86
0.04
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
—
15
341.69
341.69
0.46
2
73.17
73.17
0.10
0.08
10
10
0.01
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
—
2
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
2
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
4.44
4.44
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
—
2
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
2.45
2.45
0.00
C 3-Naphthalenes
581
—
23
523.92
523.92
0.90
2
92.68
92.68
0.16
0.20
23.36
23.36
0.04
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
—
10
227.79
227.79
0.27
1
68.29
68.29
0.08
0.10
11.33
11.33
0.01
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
—
2
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
—
5
109.34
109.34
0.17
1
25.85
25.85
0.04
0.14
16.36
16.36
0.02
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
—
2
0.00
0.00
0.00
1
47.32
47.32
0.05
0.07
7.71
7.71
0.01
Chrysene
844
826
11
251
251
0.30
2
93
93
0.11
0.05
6
6
0.01
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
1
21
21
0.02
0
10.24
10.24
0.01
0.00
0.51
0.51
0.00
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
18
410
410
0.58
3
160.98
160.98
0.23
0.06
7
7
0.01
Fluorene
538
26,000
17
387
387
0.72
1
63
63
0.12
0.04
5.02
5.02
0.01
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
—
4
82
82
0.07
1
33
33
0.03
0.02
2
2
0.00
Naphthalene
385
61,700
46
1048
1048
3
4
190
190
0
0.21
24.53
24.53
0.06
Perylene
967
431
2
0.00
0.00
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
55
1253
1253
2.10
5
248.78
248.78
0.42
0.12
14
14
0.02
Pyrene
697
9,090
36
820
820
1.18
5
239.02
239.02
0.34
0.11
13
13
0.02
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
17.91
...
...
...
3.99
...
...
...
0.39
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the maximum
COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA,
2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
(ig/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 16 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT16-13
HT16-13
HT16-13
HT16-13-SURF
HT16-13-0010
HT16-13-1030
6/13/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
Coc, PAHi, FCVf
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g oc
Hg/g oc
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
—
—
1.54
0.0154
—
—
5.4
0.054
—
—
12.3
0.123
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methy lnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.09
5.52
5.52
0.01
14.00
259
259
0.58
17.00
138
138
0.31
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.08
5.06
5.06
0.01
10.00
185.19
185.19
0.41
17.00
138
138
0.31
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.43
27.92
27.92
0.06
28.00
519
519
1.06
26.00
211
211
0.43
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.15
9.74
9.74
0.02
1.60
29.63
29.63
0.07
1.60
13.01
13.01
0.03
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.40
25.97
25.97
0.04
17.00
315
315
0.53
15.00
122
122
0.21
Benzo falanthracene
841
4,153
1.40
91
91
0.11
15.00
278
278
0.33
14.00
114
114
0.14
Benzofalpyrene
965
3,840
1.60
104
104
0.11
14.00
259
259
0.27
12.00
98
98
0.10
Benzofblfluoranthene
979
2,169
1.10
71.43
71.43
0.07
7.20
133.33
133.33
0.14
7.00
57
57
0.06
Benzofelpyrene
967
4,300
0.96
62.34
62.34
0.06
7.90
146
146
0.15
7.00
57
57
0.06
Benzo fg,h,ilpery lene
1,095
648
0.71
46.10
46.10
0.04
5.70
105.56
105.56
0.10
4.80
39
39
0.04
Benzofklfluoranthene
981
1,220
1.10
71.43
71.43
0.07
11.00
204
204
0.21
9.20
75
75
0.08
Cl-Chrysenes
929
—
0.64
41.56
41.56
0.04
9.80
181.48
181.48
0.20
10.00
81
81
0.09
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
—
2.20
143
143
0.19
34.00
630
630
0.82
35
285
285
0.37
Cl-Fluorenes
611
—
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.10
41.46
41.46
0.07
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
—
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
16.00
296
296
0.67
24
195
195
0.44
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
—
1.00
65
65
0.10
28.00
519
519
0.77
32
260
260
0.39
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
—
0.29
18.83
18.83
0.02
2.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.70
46.34
46.34
0.05
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
—
—
0.90
58.44
58.44
—
12.00
222
222
—
12.00
98
98
—
C2-Fluorenes
686
—
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.55
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
—
0.54
35.06
35.06
0.07
42.00
778
778
1.53
54
439
439
0.86
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
—
0.56
36.36
36.36
0.05
11.00
204
204
0.27
18.00
146
146
0.20
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
—
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.55
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.55
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
—
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.55
0.00
0.00
0.00
C 3-Naphthalenes
581
—
0.51
33.12
33.12
0.06
23.00
426
426
0.73
32.00
260
260
0.45
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
—
0.52
33.77
33.77
0.04
10.00
185.19
185.19
0.22
22.00
179
179
0.22
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
—
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.55
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
—
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
8.20
66.67
66.67
0.10
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
—
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
11.00
89.43
89.43
0.10
Chrysene
844
826
1.50
97
97
0.12
16.00
296
296
0.35
15.00
122
122
0.14
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.21
13.64
13.64
0.01
1.50
27.78
27.78
0.02
1.70
13.82
13.82
0.01
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
2.00
130
130
0.18
26.00
481
481
0.68
26
211
211
0.30
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.30
19.48
19.48
0.04
14.00
259.26
259.26
0.48
14.00
114
114
0.21
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
—
0.64
41.56
41.56
0.04
4.90
90.74
90.74
0.08
4.40
36
36
0.03
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.11
7.14
7.14
0.02
12.00
222.22
222.22
0.58
16.00
130
130
0.34
Perylene
967
431
0.29
18.83
18.83
0.02
2.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.55
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
1.40
91
91
0.15
50.00
926
926
1.55
42
341
341
0.57
Pyrene
697
9,090
3.10
201
201
0.29
49.00
907
907
1.30
45
366
366
0.52
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
2.02
...
...
...
13.10
...
...
...
6.58
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the maximum
COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA,
2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
(ig/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 17 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT16-13
HT16-13
HT16-14
HT16-13-1030-FD
HT16-13-3050
HT16-14-SURF
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/13/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
1-3
3-5
0-0.5
Coc, PAHi, FCVf
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g oc
Hg/g oc
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
—
—
11.5
0.115
—
—
1.36
0.0136
—
—
0.387
0.00387
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methy lnaphthalene
446
165,700
14.00
122
122
0.273
0.59
43.38
43.38
0.10
0.10
26
26
0.06
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
14.00
121.74
121.74
0.272
0.81
59.56
59.56
0.13
0.10
25
25
0.06
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
18.000
157
157
0.319
0.64
47.06
47.06
0.10
0.63
163
163
0.33
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
1.600
13.91
13.91
0.0308
0.03
1.84
1.84
0.00
0.70
180.88
180.88
0.40
Anthracene
594
1,300
11.00
96
96
0.161
0.42
30.88
30.88
0.05
0.86
222
222
0.37
Benzo falanthracene
841
4,153
12.00
104
104
0.124
0.21
15
15
0.02
4.30
1111
1111
1.32
Benzofalpyrene
965
3,840
9.20
80
80
0.083
0.16
12
12
0.01
5.40
1395
1395
1.45
Benzofblfluoranthene
979
2,169
5.80
50
50
0.052
0.09
7
7
0.01
3.20
827
827
0.84
Benzofelpyrene
967
4,300
5.70
49.57
49.57
0.051
0.07
0
0
0.00
3.30
853
853
0.88
Benzo fg,h,ilpery lene
1,095
648
3.50
30.43
30.43
0.028
0.06
5
5
0.00
2.40
620
620
0.57
Benzofklfluoranthene
981
1,220
7.40
64
64
0.066
0.14
10
10
0.01
3.40
879
879
0.90
Cl-Chrysenes
929
—
9.70
84.35
84.35
0.091
0.18
13
13
0.01
2.80
724
724
0.78
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
—
31.00
270
270
0.350
0.59
43
43
0.06
8.60
2222
2222
2.89
Cl-Fluorenes
611
—
4.40
38.26
38.26
0.06
0.14
10.29
10.29
0.02
0.27
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
—
19.00
165
165
0.372
0.96
70.59
70.59
0.16
0.27
0
0
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
—
30.00
261
261
0.389
0.73
54
54
0.08
2.10
543
543
0.81
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
—
5.50
47.83
47.83
0.05
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.20
310.08
310.08
0.31
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
—
—
12.00
104.35
104.35
—
0.23
17
17
—
3.40
879
879
—
C2-Fluorenes
686
—
3.70
32.17
32.17
0.05
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.27
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
—
50.00
435
435
0.853
1.70
125.00
125.00
0.25
0.73
189
189
0.37
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
—
19.00
165.22
165.22
0.221
0.34
25
25
0.03
1.50
388
388
0.52
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
—
3.20
27.83
27.83
0.03
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.27
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
5.70
49.57
49.57
0.05
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.27
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
—
4.60
40.00
40.00
0.05
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.27
0.00
0.00
0.00
C 3-Naphthalenes
581
—
32.00
278
278
0.48
0.82
60.29
60.29
0.10
0.66
171
171
0.29
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
—
23.00
200.00
200.00
0.24
0.35
25.74
25.74
0.03
1.30
335.92
335.92
0.41
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
—
1.45
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.27
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
—
8.90
77.39
77.39
0.12
0.22
16.18
16.18
0.02
0.27
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
—
13.00
113.04
113.04
0.12
0.18
13.24
13.24
0.01
0.55
142.12
142.12
0.16
Chrysene
844
826
13.00
113
113
0.134
0.23
17
17
0.02
4.60
1189
826
0.98
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
1.300
11.30
11.30
0.0101
0.02
1.18
1.18
0.00
0.64
165.37
165.37
0.15
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
21.00
183
183
0.258
0.40
29
29
0.04
3.90
1008
1008
1.43
Fluorene
538
26,000
10.00
87
87
0.162
0.39
28.68
28.68
0.05
0.55
142
142
0.26
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
—
3.40
29.57
29.57
0.0265
0.05
4
4
0.00
2.00
517
517
0.46
Naphthalene
385
61,700
11.000
96
96
0.248
0.91
66.91
66.91
0.17
0.18
47
47
0.12
Perylene
967
431
1.45
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.98
253.23
253.23
0.26
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
31.00
270
270
0.452
0.90
66
66
0.11
2.00
517
517
0.87
Pyrene
697
9,090
36.00
313
313
0.449
0.71
52
52
0.07
8.00
2067
2067
2.97
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
6.08
...
...
...
1.46
...
...
...
21.08
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the maximum
COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA,
2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
(ig/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 18 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT16-14
HT16-14
HT16-15
HT16-14-0010
HT16-14-1030
HT16-15-SURF
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/13/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
Coc, PAHi, FCVf
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g oc
Hg/g oc
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
—
—
0.985
0.00985
—
—
0.419
0.00419
—
—
4.58
0.0458
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methy lnaphthalene
446
165,700
6
609
609
1.37
0.10
23.63
23.63
0.05
0.06
1.38
1.38
0.00
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
6
589
589
1.32
0.10
23.87
23.87
0.05
0.07
1.59
1.59
0.00
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
14
1421
1421
2.89
0.18
42.96
42.96
0.09
0.11
2.40
2.40
0.00
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.6
64.0
64.0
0.142
0.01
2.27
2.27
0.005
0.06
1.27
1.27
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
5.90
599
599
1.01
0.07
15.99
15.99
0.03
0.18
3.93
3.93
0.01
Benzo falanthracene
841
4,153
4.40
447
447
0.53
0.06
14.32
14.32
0.02
0.58
12.66
12.66
0.02
Benzofalpyrene
965
3,840
3.30
335
335
0.35
0.05
12.65
12.65
0.01
0.67
14.63
14.63
0.02
Benzofblfluoranthene
979
2,169
1.70
173
173
0.18
0.03
6.68
6.68
0.01
0.63
13.76
13.76
0.01
Benzofelpyrene
967
4,300
0.95
0
0
0.00
0.03
7.40
7.40
0.01
0.49
10.70
10.70
0.01
Benzo fg,h,ilpery lene
1,095
648
1.20
121.83
121.83
0.11
0.03
7.88
7.88
0.01
0.39
8.52
8.52
0.01
Benzofklfluoranthene
981
1,220
2.40
244
244
0.25
0.03
8.11
8.11
0.01
0.62
13.54
13.54
0.01
Cl-Chrysenes
929
—
2.80
284
284
0.31
0.05
11.69
11.69
0.01
0.39
8.52
8.52
0.01
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
—
12
1218
1218
1.58
0.16
38.19
38.19
0.05
0.83
18.12
18.12
0.02
Cl-Fluorenes
611
—
2.50
253.81
253.81
0.42
0.03
7.88
7.88
0.01
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
—
8
832
832
1.87
0.14
33.41
33.41
0.08
0.09
2.03
2.03
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
—
14
1421
1421
2.12
0.19
45.35
45.35
0.07
0.39
8.52
8.52
0.01
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
—
0.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
7.64
7.64
0.01
0.21
4.59
4.59
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
—
—
3.40
345
345
—
0.07
16.47
16.47
—
0.43
9.39
9.39
—
C2-Fluorenes
686
—
0.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
5.97
5.97
0.01
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
—
21
2132
2132
4.18
0.31
73.99
73.99
0.15
0.26
5.68
5.68
0.01
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
—
3.70
376
376
0.50
0.10
23.15
23.15
0.03
0.29
6.33
6.33
0.01
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
—
0.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
6.21
6.21
0.01
0.13
2.84
2.84
0.00
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
9.55
9.55
0.01
0.18
3.93
3.93
0.004
C3-Fluorenes
769
—
0.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
5.25
5.25
0.01
0.09
1.97
1.97
0.00
C 3-Naphthalenes
581
—
9.10
924
924
1.59
0.24
57.28
57.28
0.10
0.26
5.68
5.68
0.01
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
—
3.10
314.72
314.72
0.38
0.08
18.85
18.85
0.02
0.35
7.64
7.64
0.01
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
—
0.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
—
0.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.12
28.64
28.64
0.04
0.11
2.40
2.40
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
—
0.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
12.41
12.41
0.01
0.19
4.15
4.15
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
4.10
416
416
0.493
0.07
15.51
15.51
0.02
0.78
17.03
17.03
0.02
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.4
43.7
43.7
0.0389
0.01
1.55
1.55
0.001
0.12
2.62
2.62
0.002
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
8
761
761
1.08
0.10
23.15
23.15
0.03
0.99
21.62
21.62
0.03
Fluorene
538
26,000
7.900
802
802
1.491
0.10
22.67
22.67
0.04
0.10
2.07
2.07
0.004
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
—
1.00
102
102
0.091
0.02
4.30
4.30
0.00
0.38
8.30
8.30
0.007
Naphthalene
385
61,700
16
1624
1624
4.22
0.25
59.67
59.67
0.15
0.10
2.14
2.14
0.006
Perylene
967
431
0.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.16
3.49
3.49
0.004
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
24
2437
2437
4.09
0.25
59.67
59.67
0.10
0.49
10.70
10.70
0.02
Pyrene
697
9,090
15
1523
1523
2.18
0.18
42.96
42.96
0.06
1.20
26.20
26.20
0.04
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
32.10
...
...
...
1.19
...
...
...
0.33
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the maximum
COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA,
2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
(ig/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 19 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT16-15
HT16-15
HT16-16
HT16-15-0010
HT16-15-1030
HT16-16-SURF
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/10/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
Coc, PAHi, FCVf
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g oc
Hg/g oc
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
—
—
3.36
0.0336
—
—
1.09
0.0109
—
—
0.409
0.00409
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methy lnaphthalene
446
165,700
3
92
92
0.21
0.02
2
2
0.00
0
20
20
0.05
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
1
42
42
0.093
0.01
1
1
0.00
0
14
14
0.03
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
9
274
274
0.5577
0.02
2
2
0.00
0.29
71
71
0.14
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.69
20.54
20.54
0.0454
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
9.29
9.29
0.02
Anthracene
594
1,300
6.80
202
202
0.341
0.02
2
2
0.00
0.25
61
61
0.10
Benzo falanthracene
841
4,153
5.60
167
167
0.20
0.01
1
1
0.00
0.32
78
78
0.09
Benzofalpyrene
965
3,840
5.30
158
158
0.1635
0.01
0.91
0.91
0.00
0.30
73
73
0.08
Benzofblfluoranthene
979
2,169
3.00
89
89
0.09
0.01
0.91
0.91
0.00
0.19
46
46
0.05
Benzofelpyrene
967
4,300
3.10
92.26
92.26
0.10
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.20
48.90
48.90
0.05
Benzo fg,h,ilpery lene
1,095
648
2.10
63
63
0.06
0.02
1.56
1.56
0.00
0.16
39
39
0.04
Benzofklfluoranthene
981
1,220
3.90
116
116
0.1183
0.01
0.56
0.56
0.00
0.23
56
56
0.06
Cl-Chrysenes
929
—
4.50
133.93
133.93
0.14
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.18
44
44
0.05
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
—
14.00
417
417
0.54
0.05
4
4
0.01
0.62
152
152
0.20
Cl-Fluorenes
611
—
2.50
74.40
74.40
0.12
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0
0
0.00
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
—
3
83
83
0.19
0.01
0
0
0.00
0
23
23
0.05
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
—
14.00
417
417
0.62
0.06
6
6
0.01
0.53
130
130
0.19
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
—
2.40
71.43
71.43
0.07
0.03
2.66
2.66
0.00
0.12
29.34
29.34
0.03
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
—
—
5.50
164
164
—
0.04
3.94
3.94
—
0.24
59
59
—
C2-Fluorenes
686
—
1.50
44.64
44.64
0.07
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
—
22
655
655
1.28
0.11
10
10
0.02
0
120
120
0.23
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
—
6.30
188
188
0.25
0.06
5.60
5.60
0.01
0.32
78
78
0.10
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
—
0.75
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
2.66
2.66
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
1.80
53.57
53.57
0.06
0.04
3.30
3.30
0.00
0.10
24.21
24.21
0.03
C3-Fluorenes
769
—
0.75
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
C 3-Naphthalenes
581
—
12.00
357
357
0.61
0.19
17
17
0.03
0.51
125
125
0.21
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
—
4.80
142.86
142.86
0.17
0.10
9.17
9.17
0.01
0.29
71
71
0.09
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
—
0.75
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
—
2.70
80.36
80.36
0.12
0.12
11.01
11.01
0.02
0.22
53.79
53.79
0.08
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
—
2.00
59.52
59.52
0.07
0.06
5.78
5.78
0.01
0.13
31.78
31.78
0.03
Chrysene
844
826
6.30
188
188
0.222
0.02
2
2
0.00
0.35
86
86
0.10
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.65
19.35
19.35
0.0172
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
12.22
12.22
0.011
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
8.90
265
265
0.375
0.02
2
2
0.00
0.68
166
166
0.24
Fluorene
538
26,000
6.10
182
182
0.337
0.01
1
1
0.00
0.17
42
42
0.077
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
—
1.80
54
54
0.0480
0.00
0.33
0.33
0.00
0.14
34
34
0.03
Naphthalene
385
61,700
2
63
63
0.162
0.37
34
34
0.09
0
12
12
0.030
Perylene
967
431
0.75
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
16
476
476
0.799
0.05
4
4
0.01
1
183
183
0.31
Pyrene
697
9,090
15
446
446
0.641
0.04
4
4
0.01
0.93
227
227
0.33
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
8.52
...
...
...
0.24
...
...
...
3.05
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the maximum
COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA,
2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
(ig/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 20 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT16-16
HT16-16
HT16-16
HT16-16-0010
HT16-16-1030
HT16-16-1030-FD
6/12/2016
6/12/2016
6/12/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
0-1
1-3
1-3
Coc, PAHi, FCVf
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g oc
Hg/g oc
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
—
—
0.401
0.00401
—
—
1.54
0.0154
—
—
1.56
0.0156
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methy lnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.46
115
115
0.26
2.40
155.84
155.84
0.35
4.20
269.23
269.23
0.60
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
1
349
349
0.781
1.30
84.42
84.42
0.189
4.10
262.82
262.82
0.588
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
1.30
324
324
0.660
5.90
383.12
383.12
0.780
11.00
705.13
705.13
1.436
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.38
94.76
94.76
0.210
0.49
31.82
31.82
0.070
1.20
76.92
76.92
0.170
Anthracene
594
1,300
2.70
673
673
1.13
3.20
207.79
207.79
0.350
8.30
532.05
532.05
0.896
Benzo falanthracene
841
4,153
5.00
1247
1247
1.48
5.10
331.17
331.17
0.39
11.00
705.13
705.13
0.84
Benzofalpyrene
965
3,840
4.80
1197
1197
1.24
4.60
298.70
298.70
0.31
11.00
705.13
705.13
0.73
Benzofblfluoranthene
979
2,169
2.50
623
623
0.637
2.70
175.32
175.32
0.179
5.20
333.33
333.33
0.340
Benzofelpyrene
967
4,300
2.80
698.25
698.25
0.72
2.90
188.31
188.31
0.19
6.30
403.85
403.85
0.42
Benzo fg,h,ilpery lene
1,095
648
2.20
549
549
0.501
2.60
168.83
168.83
0.15
4.70
301.28
301.28
0.28
Benzofklfluoranthene
981
1,220
3.60
898
898
0.92
3.70
240.26
240.26
0.245
7.60
487.18
487.18
0.497
Cl-Chrysenes
929
—
1.80
448.88
448.88
0.48
2.30
149.35
149.35
0.16
4.80
307.69
307.69
0.33
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
—
9.30
2319
2319
3.01
9.70
629.87
629.87
0.82
23.00
1474.36
1474.36
1.91
Cl-Fluorenes
611
—
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
—
1
0
0
0.00
2.20
142.86
142.86
0.32
2.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
—
4.70
1172
1172
1.75
6.40
415.58
415.58
0.62
15.00
961.54
961.54
1.44
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
—
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
—
—
2.30
574
574
—
3.30
214.29
214.29
—
6.30
403.85
403.85
—
C2-Fluorenes
686
—
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
—
2
424
424
0.831
9.00
584.42
584.42
1.15
20.00
1282.05
1282.05
2.51
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
—
1.50
374
374
0.501
3.30
214.29
214.29
0.29
6.00
384.62
384.62
0.52
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
—
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
—
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
C 3-Naphthalenes
581
—
1.40
349
349
0.601
5.80
376.62
376.62
0.65
11.00
705.13
705.13
1.21
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
—
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.30
214.29
214.29
0.26
5.20
333.33
333.33
0.40
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
—
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
—
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.20
142.86
142.86
0.22
2.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
—
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.90
123.38
123.38
0.14
2.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
5.20
1297
826
0.98
5.50
357.14
357.14
0.42
12.00
769.23
769.23
0.91
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.47
117.21
117.21
0.104
0.57
37.01
37.01
0.033
1.10
70.51
70.51
0.063
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
8.20
2045
2045
2.89
8.30
538.96
538.96
0.76
17.00
1089.74
1089.74
1.54
Fluorene
538
26,000
1.40
349
349
0.649
3.20
207.79
207.79
0.386
7.30
467.95
467.95
0.870
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
—
1.60
399
399
0.358
2.00
129.87
129.87
0.116
3.60
230.77
230.77
0.207
Naphthalene
385
61,700
1
349
349
0.91
1.30
84
84
0.22
4.10
263
263
0.68
Perylene
967
431
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
8
2045
2045
3.43
12.00
779
779
1.31
31.00
1987
1987
3.33
Pyrene
697
9,090
16.00
3990
3990
5.72
16.00
1038.96
1038.96
1.49
39.00
2500.00
2500.00
3.59
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
29.72
...
...
...
12.03
...
...
...
25.12
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the maximum
COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA,
2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
(ig/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 21 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HT16-16
HT16-16
Sample Name:
HT16-16-3055
HT16-16-5570
Sample Date:
6/12/2016
6/12/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
3-5.5
5.5-7
Coc, PAHi, FCVf
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/g dry
ESBTU
Hg/g oc
Hg/g oc
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
—
—
11.5
0.115
—
—
0.957
0.00957
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methy lnaphthalene
446
165,700
510.00
4434.78
4434.78
9.94
0.43
44.93
44.93
0.10
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
730.00
6347.83
6347.83
14.201
0.62
64.79
64.79
0.145
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
630.00
5478.26
5478.26
11.157
0.44
45.98
45.98
0.094
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
25.00
217.39
217.39
0.481
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.000
Anthracene
594
1,300
200.00
1739.13
1300.00
2.189
0.39
40.75
40.75
0.069
Benzofal anthracene
841
4,153
150.00
1304.35
1304.35
1.55
0.39
40.75
40.75
0.05
Benzofalpyrene
965
3,840
110.00
956.52
956.52
0.99
0.08
7.84
7.84
0.01
Benzo fb] fluoranthene
979
2,169
47.00
408.70
408.70
0.417
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.000
Benzofelpyrene
967
4,300
57.00
495.65
495.65
0.51
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
Benzo \ g,h,ilperylene
1,095
648
33.00
286.96
286.96
0.26
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
Benzo [k| fluoranthene
981
1,220
79.00
686.96
686.96
0.700
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.000
Cl-Chrysenes
929
—
100.00
869.57
869.57
0.94
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
—
500.00
4347.83
4347.83
5.65
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
Cl-Fluorenes
611
—
97.00
843.48
843.48
1.38
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
—
860.00
7478.26
7478.26
16.84
0.74
77.32
77.32
0.17
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
—
460.00
4000.00
4000.00
5.97
0.39
40.75
40.75
0.06
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
—
26.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
—
—
140.00
1217.39
1217.39
—
0.20
0.00
0.00
—
C2-Fluorenes
686
—
26.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
—
1300.00
11304.35
11304.35
22.17
0.95
99.27
99.27
0.19
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
-
150.00
1304.35
1304.35
1.75
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
-
26.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
-
26.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
-
26.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Naphthalenes
581
-
440.00
3826.09
3826.09
6.59
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
-
71.00
617.39
617.39
0.74
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
-
26.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
—
26.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
-
26.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
150.00
1304.35
826.00
0.98
0.39
40.75
40.75
0.05
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
12.00
104.35
104.35
0.093
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.000
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
210.00
1826.09
1826.09
2.58
0.39
40.75
40.75
0.06
Fluorene
538
26,000
340.00
2956.52
2956.52
5.495
0.39
40.75
40.75
0.076
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
—
28.00
243.48
243.48
0.218
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.000
Naphthalene
385
61,700
830.00
7217
7217
18.75
2.10
219
219
0.57
Perylene
967
431
26.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
670.00
5826
5826
9.78
0.53
55
55
0.09
Pyrene
697
9,090
490.00
4260.87
4260.87
6.11
0.39
40.75
40.75
0.06
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
124.28
...
...
...
1.55
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the maximum
COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA,
2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
(ig/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 22 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT16-17
HT16-17
HT16-17
HT16-17-SURF
HT16-17-SURF-FD
HT16-17-0015
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
6/14/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-1.5
Coc, PAHi, FCVf
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g oc
Hg/g oc
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
—
—
3.39
0.0339
—
—
3.94
0.0394
—
—
0.493
0.00493
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methy lnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.05
1.36
1.36
0.00
0.04
1
1
0.00
2
365
365
0.82
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.05
1.36
1.36
0.00
0.04
1
1
0.00
0
63
63
0.14
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.11
3.24
3.24
0.007
0.09
2
2
0.00
2
426
426
0.87
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.04
1.30
1.30
0.003
0.04
0.94
0.94
0.00
0.13
26
26
0.058
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.14
4.13
4.13
0.01
0.14
4
4
0.01
2
325
325
0.55
Benzofalanthracene
841
4,153
0.57
16.81
16.81
0.02
0.45
11
11
0.01
1
284
284
0.34
Benzofalpyrene
965
3,840
0.64
18.88
18.88
0.02
0.52
13
13
0.01
1.10
223
223
0.23
Benzofblfluoranthene
979
2,169
0.69
20.35
20.35
0.02
0.58
15
15
0.02
0.86
174
174
0.18
Benzofelpyrene
967
4,300
0.50
14.75
14.75
0.02
0.41
10
10
0.01
0.68
137.93
137.93
0.14
Benzofg,h,ilperylene
1,095
648
0.47
13.86
13.86
0.01
0.35
8.88
8.88
0.01
0.46
93
93
0.09
Benzofklfluoranthene
981
1,220
0.70
20.65
20.65
0.02
0.51
13
13
0.01
0.95
193
193
0.20
Cl-Chrysenes
929
—
0.31
9.14
9.14
0.01
0.25
6
6
0.01
0.61
123.73
123.73
0.13
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
—
0.66
19
19
0.03
0.63
16
16
0.02
3
548
548
0.71
Cl-Fluorenes
611
—
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
—
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0
0
0.00
1
284
284
0.64
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
—
0.32
9.44
9.44
0.01
0.26
7
7
0.01
3
527
527
0.79
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
—
0.13
3.83
3.83
0.00
0.16
4.06
4.06
0.00
0.41
83.16
83.16
0.08
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
—
—
0.26
7.67
7.67
—
0.24
6
6
—
0.88
178.50
178.50
—
C2-Fluorenes
686
—
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
—
0.21
6.19
6.19
0.01
0.20
5
5
0.01
4
771
771
1.51
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
—
0.21
6.19
6.19
0.01
0.18
5
5
0.01
1.00
202.84
202.84
0.27
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
—
0.10
2.95
2.95
0.00
0.10
2.54
2.54
0.00
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
—
0.12
3.54
3.54
0.00
0.13
3.30
3.30
0.00
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
—
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Naphthalenes
581
—
0.26
7.67
7.67
0.01
0.23
6
6
0.01
2
467
467
0.80
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
—
0.23
6.78
6.78
0.01
0.23
5.84
5.84
0.01
0.82
166.33
166.33
0.20
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
—
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
—
0.12
3.54
3.54
0.01
0.11
2.79
2.79
0.00
0.49
99.39
99.39
0.15
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
—
0.12
3.54
3.54
0.00
0.14
3.55
3.55
0.00
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.82
24.19
24.19
0.03
0.67
17
17
0.02
1.50
304
304
0.36
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.15
4.42
4.42
0.00
0.09
2.26
2.26
0.00
0.17
34
34
0.03
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
1.20
35.40
35.40
0.05
0.87
22
22
0.03
3
548
548
0.77
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.10
2.83
2.83
0.005
0.08
2
2
0.00
1
264
264
0.49
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
—
0.46
13.57
13.57
0.01
0.34
8.63
8.63
0.01
0.44
89
89
0.08
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.05
1.53
1.53
0.004
0.05
1
1
0.00
0
61
61
0.16
Perylene
967
431
0.17
5.01
5.01
0.01
0.13
3.30
3.30
0.00
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.52
15.34
15.34
0.03
0.43
11
11
0.02
4
811
811
1.36
Pyrene
697
9,090
1.30
38
38
0.06
1.10
28
28
0.04
4
892
892
1.28
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
0.43
...
...
...
0.31
...
...
...
12.47
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the maximum
COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA,
2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
(ig/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 23 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT16-17
HT16-17
HT16-18
HT16-17-1530
HT16-17-3050
HT16-18-SURF
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
1.5-3
3-5
0-05
Coc, PAHi, FCVf
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g oc
Hg/g oc
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
—
-
2.25
0.0225
—
—
1.05
0.0105
—
—
0.161
0.00161
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methy lnaphthalene
446
165,700
7.40
328.89
328.89
0.74
0.13
12
12
0.03
0.12
74.53
74.53
0.167
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
9.30
413.33
413.33
0.92
0.12
11
11
0.03
0.09
57.14
57.14
0.128
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
8.30
368.89
368.89
0.75
0.16
15
15
0.03
0.34
211.18
211.18
0.43
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.50
22.22
22.22
0.05
0.03
2.48
2.48
0.01
0.08
50.31
50.31
0.111
Anthracene
594
1,300
8.00
355.56
355.56
0.60
0.14
13.33
13.33
0.02
0.23
142.86
142.86
0.241
Benzofalanthracene
841
4,153
8.90
395.56
395.56
0.47
0.24
22.86
22.86
0.03
0.20
124.22
124.22
0.15
Benzofalpyrene
965
3,840
7.80
346.67
346.67
0.36
0.26
24.76
24.76
0.03
0.15
93.17
93.17
0.10
Benzofblfluoranthene
979
2,169
5.50
244.44
244.44
0.25
0.19
18.10
18.10
0.02
0.16
99.38
99.38
0.102
Benzofelpyrene
967
4,300
4.60
204.44
204.44
0.21
0.16
15.24
15.24
0.02
0.10
62.11
62.11
0.064
Benzofg,h,ilperylene
1,095
648
4.40
195.56
195.56
0.18
0.13
12.38
12.38
0.01
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.000
Benzofklfluoranthene
981
1,220
6.50
288.89
288.89
0.29
0.18
17.14
17.14
0.02
0.13
80.75
80.75
0.082
Cl-Chrysenes
929
-
4.70
208.89
208.89
0.22
0.16
15.24
15.24
0.02
0.08
50.93
50.93
0.055
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
-
14.00
622.22
622.22
0.81
0.40
38.10
38.10
0.05
0.29
180.12
180.12
0.234
Cl-Fluorenes
611
-
2.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
3.81
3.81
0.01
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
-
12.00
533.33
533.33
1.20
0.18
17
17
0.04
0.14
86.96
86.96
0.20
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
-
11.00
488.89
488.89
0.73
0.29
27.62
27.62
0.04
0.35
217.39
217.39
0.324
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
-
2.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.12
11.43
11.43
0.01
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
—
-
4.70
208.89
208.89
—
0.16
15.24
15.24
—
0.14
86.96
86.96
—
C2-Fluorenes
686
-
2.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
—
16.00
711.11
711.11
1.39
0.37
35
35
0.07
0.71
440.99
440.99
0.865
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
-
2.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.16
15.24
15.24
0.02
0.20
124.22
124.22
0.167
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
-
2.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
4.95
4.95
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
-
2.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.08
7.24
7.24
0.01
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
-
2.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Naphthalenes
581
-
7.40
328.89
328.89
0.57
0.28
26.67
26.67
0.05
0.49
304.35
304.35
0.524
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
-
2.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.24
22.86
22.86
0.03
0.22
136.65
136.65
0.165
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
-
2.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
—
2.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.13
12.38
12.38
0.02
0.21
130.43
130.43
0.199
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
-
5.50
244.44
244.44
0.27
0.33
31.43
31.43
0.03
0.09
52.80
52.80
0.06
Chrysene
844
826
9.20
408.89
408.89
0.48
0.26
24.76
24.76
0.03
0.23
142.86
142.86
0.17
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
1.10
48.89
48.89
0.04
0.04
3.43
3.43
0.00
0.03
20.50
20.50
0.018
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
17.00
755.56
755.56
1.07
0.38
36.19
36.19
0.05
0.60
372.67
372.67
0.53
Fluorene
538
26,000
6.20
275.56
275.56
0.51
0.12
11.43
11.43
0.02
0.21
130.43
130.43
0.242
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
—
4.40
195.56
195.56
0.18
0.11
10.48
10.48
0.01
0.09
52.80
52.80
0.047
Naphthalene
385
61,700
12.00
533.33
533.33
1.39
0.21
20
20
0.05
0.15
93.17
93.17
0.242
Perylene
967
431
2.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
5.52
5.52
0.01
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.000
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
21.00
933.33
933.33
1.57
0.40
38
38
0.06
0.89
552.80
552.80
0.93
Pyrene
697
9,090
24.00
1066.67
1066.67
1.53
0.52
49.52
49.52
0.07
0.73
453.42
453.42
0.65
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
15.12
...
...
...
0.87
...
...
...
6.88
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the maximum
COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA,
2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
(ig/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 24 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT16-18B
HT16-18B
HT16-18B
HT16-18B-0010
HT16-18B-1030
HT16-18B-3050
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
0-1
1-3
3-5
Coc, PAHi, FCVf
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g oc
Hg/g oc
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
—
-
0.227
0.00227
—
—
2.54
0.0254
—
—
8.27
0.0827
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methy lnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.14
61.67
61.67
0.14
10.000
393.70
393.70
0.883
280.00
3385.73
3385.73
7.59
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.14
61.67
61.67
0.14
8.300
326.77
326.77
0.731
400.00
4836.76
4836.76
10.82
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.60
264.32
264.32
0.54
13.00
511.81
511.81
1.04
360.00
4353.08
4353.08
8.87
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.14
61.67
61.67
0.14
2.300
90.55
90.55
0.2003
12.00
145.10
145.10
0.32
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.37
163
163
0.27
9.70
381.89
381.89
0.64
150.00
1813.78
1300.00
2.19
Benzofalanthracene
841
4,153
0.44
194
194
0.23
13.00
511.81
511.81
0.61
97.00
1173
1173
1.39
Benzofalpyrene
965
3,840
0.39
171.81
171.81
0.18
11.00
433.07
433.07
0.45
70.00
846
846
0.88
Benzofblfluoranthene
979
2,169
0.26
114.54
114.54
0.12
6.70
263.78
263.78
0.27
30.00
363
363
0.37
Benzofelpyrene
967
4,300
0.24
105.73
105.73
0.11
6.50
255.91
255.91
0.26
23.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Benzofg,h,ilperylene
1,095
648
0.14
61.67
61.67
0.06
3.70
145.67
145.67
0.13
22.00
266.02
266.02
0.24
Benzofklfluoranthene
981
1,220
0.35
154.19
154.19
0.16
8.70
342.52
342.52
0.35
53.00
640.87
640.87
0.65
Cl-Chrysenes
929
-
0.21
92.51
92.51
0.10
9.30
366.14
366.14
0.39
71.00
858.52
858.52
0.92
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
-
0.97
427
427
0.55
29.00
1141.73
1141.73
1.48
280.00
3386
3386
4.40
Cl-Fluorenes
611
-
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
58.00
701.33
701.33
1.15
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
-
0.17
74.89
74.89
0.17
13.00
511.81
511.81
1.15
470.00
5683.19
5683.19
12.80
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
-
0.62
273
273
0.41
24.00
944.88
944.88
1.41
280.00
3386
3386
5.05
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
-
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
7.50
295.28
295.28
0.29
23.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
—
-
0.29
128
128
—
13.00
511.81
511.81
—
88.00
1064.09
1064.09
—
C2-Fluorenes
686
-
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.10
122.05
122.05
0.18
23.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
—
0.79
348.02
348.02
0.68
37.00
1456.69
1456.69
2.86
710.00
8585.25
8585.25
16.83
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
-
0.32
141
141
0.19
15.00
590.55
590.55
0.79
96.00
1160.82
1160.82
1.56
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
-
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.20
125.98
125.98
0.11
23.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
-
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
7.30
287.40
287.40
0.30
23.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
-
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.50
137.80
137.80
0.18
23.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Naphthalenes
581
-
0.67
295
295
0.51
24.00
944.88
944.88
1.63
240.00
2902.06
2902.06
4.99
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
-
0.32
140.97
140.97
0.17
20.00
787.40
787.40
0.95
47.00
568.32
568.32
0.69
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
-
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
23.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
—
0.24
105.73
105.73
0.16
7.00
275.59
275.59
0.42
23.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
-
0.16
70.48
70.48
0.08
9.60
377.95
377.95
0.41
23.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.50
220
220
0.26
14.00
551.18
551.18
0.65
99.00
1197
826
0.98
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.05
20.70
20.70
0.02
1.600
62.99
62.99
0.0561
8.20
99.15
99.15
0.088
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
1.10
485
485
0.69
22.00
866.14
866.14
1.23
150.00
1814
1814
2.57
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.38
167.40
167.40
0.31
8.10
318.90
318.90
0.59
200.00
2418.38
2418.38
4.50
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
—
0.16
70.48
70.48
0.06
4.40
173.23
173.23
0.16
19.00
229.75
229.75
0.21
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.16
70.48
70.48
0.18
10.000
393.70
393.70
1.023
440.00
5320.44
5320.44
13.82
Perylene
967
431
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
23.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
1.10
485
485
0.81
29.00
1141.73
1141.73
1.92
420.00
5079
5079
8.52
Pyrene
697
9,090
1.70
749
749
1.07
35.00
1377.95
1377.95
1.98
300.00
3628
3628
5.20
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
8.23
...
...
...
23.76
...
...
...
99.19
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the maximum
COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA,
2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
(ig/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 25 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT16-18B
HT16-18B
HT16-18C
HT16-18B-3050-FD
HT16-18B-5070
HT16-18C-0010
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
3-5
5-7
0-1
Coc, PAHi, FCVf
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g oc
Hg/g oc
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
—
-
7.88
0.0788
—
—
0.973
0.00973
—
—
2.19
0.0219
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methy lnaphthalene
446
165,700
190.00
2411.17
2411.17
5.41
0.37
38.03
38.03
0.09
0.87
39.73
39.73
0.09
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
230.00
2918.78
2918.78
6.530
0.52
53.44
53.44
0.12
0.62
28.31
28.31
0.06
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
230.00
2918.78
2918.78
5.945
0.42
43.17
43.17
0.09
2.30
105.02
105.02
0.21
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
47.00
596.45
596.45
1.320
0.01
1.44
1.44
0.00
0.33
15.07
15.07
0.03
Anthracene
594
1,300
140.00
1776.65
1300.00
2.19
0.16
16.44
16.44
0.03
2.40
110
110
0.18
Benzofalanthracene
841
4,153
64.00
812
812
0.97
0.14
14
14
0.02
3.60
164
164
0.20
Benzofalpyrene
965
3,840
48.00
609
609
0.63
0.07
7
7
0.01
3.60
164
164
0.17
Benzofblfluoranthene
979
2,169
23.00
291.88
291.88
0.30
0.05
5
5
0.00
2.20
100
100
0.10
Benzofelpyrene
967
4,300
23.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0
0
0.00
2.10
96
96
0.10
Benzofg,h,ilperylene
1,095
648
23.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0
0
0.00
1.60
73
73
0.07
Benzofklfluoranthene
981
1,220
37.00
469.54
469.54
0.48
0.05
5
5
0.01
2.40
110
110
0.11
Cl-Chrysenes
929
-
23.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0
0
0.00
1.60
73
73
0.08
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
-
200.00
2538
2538
3.30
0.07
0
0
0.00
6.80
311
311
0.40
Cl-Fluorenes
611
-
23.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.31
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
-
280.00
3553.30
3553.30
8.00
0.37
38.03
38.03
0.09
0.83
37.90
37.90
0.09
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
-
210.00
2664.97
2664.97
3.98
0.14
14
14
0.02
4.10
187
187
0.28
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
-
23.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.67
30.59
30.59
0.03
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
—
-
54.00
685.28
685.28
—
0.07
0
0
—
2.30
105
105
—
C2-Fluorenes
686
-
23.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.31
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
—
470.00
5964.47
5964.47
11.70
0.15
15.42
15.42
0.03
4.40
200.91
200.91
0.39
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
-
70.00
888.32
888.32
1.19
0.07
0
0
0.00
2.40
110
110
0.15
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
-
23.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.31
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
-
23.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.31
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
-
23.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.31
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Naphthalenes
581
-
190.00
2411.17
2411.17
4.15
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.70
168.95
168.95
0.29
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
-
23.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.00
91.32
91.32
0.11
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
-
23.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.31
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
—
23.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.90
86.76
86.76
0.13
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
-
23.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.20
54.79
54.79
0.06
Chrysene
844
826
72.00
914
826
0.98
0.14
14
14
0.02
3.80
174
174
0.21
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
4.50
57.11
57.11
0.051
0.01
1.13
1.13
0.00
0.40
18.26
18.26
0.02
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
110.00
1396
1396
1.97
0.16
16
16
0.02
6.20
283
283
0.40
Fluorene
538
26,000
140.00
1776.65
1776.65
3.302
0.22
22.61
22.61
0.04
1.30
59.36
59.36
0.11
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
—
47.00
596.45
596.45
0.53
0.02
2
2
0.00
1.30
59
59
0.05
Naphthalene
385
61,700
250.00
3172.59
3172.59
8.240
0.81
83.25
83.25
0.22
0.62
28.31
28.31
0.07
Perylene
967
431
23.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.65
29.68
29.68
0.03
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
320.00
4060.91
4060.91
6.81
0.46
47
47
0.08
6.10
279
279
0.47
Pyrene
697
9,090
240.00
3046
3046
4.37
0.28
29
29
0.04
9.90
452
452
0.65
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
70.40
...
...
...
0.71
...
...
...
5.19
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the maximum
COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA,
2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
(ig/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 26 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT16-18C
HT16-18C
HT16-19
HT16-18C-1025
HT16-18C-2540
HT16-19-SURF
6/15/2016
6/15/2016
6/13/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
1-2.5
2.5-4
0-0.5
Coc, PAHi, FCVf
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g oc
Hg/g oc
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
—
-
6.58
0.0658
—
—
0.383
0.00383
—
—
4.96
0.0496
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methy lnaphthalene
446
165,700
200.00
3039.51
3039.51
6.82
0.30
78.33
78.33
0.18
0.02
0.34
0.34
0.00
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
290.00
4407.29
4407.29
9.86
0.44
114.88
114.88
0.26
0.02
0.40
0.40
0.00
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
250.00
3799.39
3799.39
7.74
0.36
93.99
93.99
0.19
0.03
0.52
0.52
0.00
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
8.80
133.74
133.74
0.30
0.01
3.66
3.66
0.01
0.02
0.32
0.32
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
100.00
1519.76
1300.00
2.19
0.12
31.33
31.33
0.05
0.05
1.07
1.07
0.00
Benzofalanthracene
841
4,153
65.00
987.84
987.84
1.17
0.08
21.93
21.93
0.03
0.20
4.03
4.03
0.00
Benzofalpyrene
965
3,840
48.00
729.48
729.48
0.76
0.06
16.45
16.45
0.02
0.23
4.64
4.64
0.00
Benzofblfluoranthene
979
2,169
19.00
288.75
288.75
0.29
0.04
9.92
9.92
0.01
0.25
5.04
5.04
0.01
Benzofelpyrene
967
4,300
19.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.19
3.83
3.83
0.00
Benzofg,h,ilperylene
1,095
648
15.00
227.96
227.96
0.21
0.03
8.09
8.09
0.01
0.17
3.43
3.43
0.00
Benzofklfluoranthene
981
1,220
34.00
516.72
516.72
0.53
0.04
10.44
10.44
0.01
0.25
5.04
5.04
0.01
Cl-Chrysenes
929
-
52.00
790.27
790.27
0.85
0.08
21.93
21.93
0.02
0.11
2.22
2.22
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
-
190.00
2887.54
2887.54
3.75
0.31
81
81
0.11
0.22
4
4
0.01
Cl-Fluorenes
611
-
44.00
668.69
668.69
1.09
0.07
16.97
16.97
0.03
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
-
340.00
5167.17
5167.17
11.64
0.50
130.55
130.55
0.29
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
-
220.00
3343.47
3343.47
4.99
0.33
86.16
86.16
0.13
0.10
2
2
0.00
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
-
19.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
10.97
10.97
0.01
0.08
2
2
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
—
-
67.00
1018.24
1018.24
—
0.11
28.72
28.72
—
0.14
3
3
—
C2-Fluorenes
686
-
19.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
—
540.00
8206.69
8206.69
16.09
0.79
206.27
206.27
0.40
0.08
2
2
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
-
73.00
1109.42
1109.42
1.49
0.15
39.16
39.16
0.05
0.07
1
1
0.00
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
-
19.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
1.03
1.03
0.00
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
-
19.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
10.70
10.70
0.01
0.06
1
1
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
-
19.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Naphthalenes
581
-
200.00
3039.51
3039.51
5.23
0.37
96.61
96.61
0.17
0.10
2
2
0.00
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
-
19.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.12
31.33
31.33
0.04
0.11
2
2
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
-
19.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
—
19.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.14
36.55
36.55
0.06
0.05
1
1
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
-
19.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
14.62
14.62
0.02
0.06
1
1
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
64.00
972.64
826.00
0.98
0.10
26.11
26.11
0.03
0.31
6.25
6.25
0.01
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
4.60
69.91
69.91
0.06
0.01
2.25
2.25
0.00
0.06
1.19
1.19
0.00
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
110.00
1671.73
1671.73
2.36
0.14
36.55
36.55
0.05
0.35
7.06
7.06
0.01
Fluorene
538
26,000
140.00
2127.66
2127.66
3.95
0.21
54.83
54.83
0.10
0.03
0.58
0.58
0.00
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
—
12.00
182.37
182.37
0.16
0.02
4.96
4.96
0.00
0.18
3.63
3.63
0.00
Naphthalene
385
61,700
300.00
4559.27
4559.27
11.84
0.55
143.60
143.60
0.37
0.03
0.50
0.50
0.00
Perylene
967
431
19.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
1.23
1.23
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
300.00
4559.27
4559.27
7.65
0.44
114.88
114.88
0.19
0.16
3
3
0.01
Pyrene
697
9,090
190.00
2887.54
2887.54
4.14
0.30
78.33
78.33
0.11
0.43
9
9
0.01
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
89.47
...
...
...
2.53
...
...
...
0.10
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the maximum
COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA,
2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
(ig/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 27 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT16-19
HT16-19
HT16-19
HT16-19-0010
HT16-19-1030
HT16-19-3050
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
0-1
1-3
3-5
Coc, PAHi, FCVf
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g oc
Hg/g oc
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
—
-
6.81
0.0681
—
—
9.01
0.0901
—
—
10.1
0.101
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methy lnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.72
10.57
10.57
0.02
5.10
56.60
56.60
0.13
21.00
207.92
207.92
0.47
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.50
7.34
7.34
0.02
6.00
66.59
66.59
0.15
30.00
297.03
297.03
0.66
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.99
14.54
14.54
0.03
6.50
72.14
72.14
0.15
27.00
267.33
267.33
0.54
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.31
4.55
4.55
0.01
1.30
14.43
14.43
0.03
3.80
37.62
37.62
0.08
Anthracene
594
1,300
1.50
22.03
22.03
0.04
7.60
84.35
84.35
0.14
31.00
306.93
306.93
0.52
Benzofalanthracene
841
4,153
2.20
32.31
32.31
0.04
9.40
104.33
104.33
0.12
35.00
346.53
346.53
0.41
Benzofalpyrene
965
3,840
2.20
32.31
32.31
0.03
7.00
77.69
77.69
0.08
28.00
277.23
277.23
0.29
Benzofblfluoranthene
979
2,169
1.90
27.90
27.90
0.03
3.90
43.29
43.29
0.04
16.00
158.42
158.42
0.16
Benzofelpyrene
967
4,300
1.50
22.03
22.03
0.02
4.10
45.50
45.50
0.05
16.00
158.42
158.42
0.16
Benzofg,h,ilperylene
1,095
648
1.20
17.62
17.62
0.02
2.60
28.86
28.86
0.03
11.00
108.91
108.91
0.10
Benzofklfluoranthene
981
1,220
2.10
30.84
30.84
0.03
5.30
58.82
58.82
0.06
21.00
207.92
207.92
0.21
Cl-Chrysenes
929
-
1.90
27.90
27.90
0.03
9.10
101.00
101.00
0.11
28.00
277.23
277.23
0.30
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
-
4.70
69
69
0.09
28.00
310.77
310.77
0.40
87.00
861
861
1.12
Cl-Fluorenes
611
-
1.00
14.68
14.68
0.02
3.10
34.41
34.41
0.06
11.00
108.91
108.91
0.18
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
-
0.87
12.78
12.78
0.03
7.60
84.35
84.35
0.19
35.00
346.53
346.53
0.78
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
-
5.20
76
76
0.11
24.00
266.37
266.37
0.40
78.00
772.28
772.28
1.15
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
-
1.20
17.62
17.62
0.02
6.00
66.59
66.59
0.07
19.00
188.12
188.12
0.19
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
—
-
2.70
40
40
—
12.00
133.19
133.19
—
37.00
366.34
366.34
—
C2-Fluorenes
686
-
2.20
32.31
32.31
0.05
3.90
43.29
43.29
0.06
8.70
86.14
86.14
0.13
C2-Naphthalenes
510
—
9.40
138
138
0.27
28.00
311
311
0.61
99.00
980.20
980.20
1.92
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
-
5.40
79
79
0.11
17.00
188.68
188.68
0.25
42.00
415.84
415.84
0.56
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
-
0.91
13.36
13.36
0.01
3.20
35.52
35.52
0.03
9.70
96.04
96.04
0.09
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
-
1.50
22
22
0.02
5.50
61.04
61.04
0.06
14.00
138.61
138.61
0.15
C3-Fluorenes
769
-
2.30
33.77
33.77
0.04
3.50
38.85
38.85
0.05
6.20
61.39
61.39
0.08
C3-Naphthalenes
581
-
16.00
235
235
0.40
25.00
277
277
0.48
67.00
663.37
663.37
1.14
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
-
8.10
119
119
0.14
20.00
222
222
0.27
45.00
445.54
445.54
0.54
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
-
0.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
—
8.30
122
122
0.19
7.90
87.68
87.68
0.13
17.00
168.32
168.32
0.26
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
-
4.90
72
72
0.08
11.00
122.09
122.09
0.13
22.00
217.82
217.82
0.24
Chrysene
844
826
2.90
42.58
42.58
0.05
10.00
110.99
110.99
0.13
38.00
376.24
376.24
0.45
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.39
5.73
5.73
0.01
0.97
10.77
10.77
0.01
3.40
33.66
33.66
0.03
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
4.40
64.61
64.61
0.09
15.00
166.48
166.48
0.24
56.00
554
554
0.78
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.96
14.10
14.10
0.03
6.60
73.25
73.25
0.14
26.00
257.43
257.43
0.48
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
—
1.10
16.15
16.15
0.01
2.60
28.86
28.86
0.03
10.00
99.01
99.01
0.09
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.19
2.79
2.79
0.01
1.10
12.21
12.21
0.03
16.00
158.42
158.42
0.41
Perylene
967
431
0.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
4.00
59
59
0.10
19.00
210.88
210.88
0.35
80.00
792
792
1.33
Pyrene
697
9,090
6.10
90
90
0.13
26.00
288.57
288.57
0.41
100.00
990
990
1.42
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
2.20
...
...
...
5.23
...
...
...
16.07
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the maximum
COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA,
2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
(ig/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 28 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT16-19
HT16-20
HT16-20
HT16-19-5070
HT16-20-SURF
HT16-20-0010
6/14/2016
6/13/2016
6/14/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
5-7
0-0.5
0-1
Coc, PAHi, FCVf
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g oc
Hg/g oc
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
—
-
0.721
0.00721
—
—
3.85
0.0385
—
—
2.55
0.0255
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methy lnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.02
2.36
2.36
0.01
0.28
7.27
7.27
0.02
0.19
7.45
7.45
0.02
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.02
2.64
2.64
0.01
0.27
7.01
7.01
0.02
0.22
8.63
8.63
0.02
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.012
1.66
1.66
0.00
0.87
22.60
22.60
0.05
0.55
21.57
21.57
0.04
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.001
0.19
0.19
0.00
0.30
7.79
7.79
0.017
0.09
3.49
3.49
0.01
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.01
1.94
1.94
0.00
1.30
33.77
33.77
0.06
0.46
18.04
18.04
0.03
Benzofalanthracene
841
4,153
0.01
1.80
1.80
0.00
3.80
98.70
98.70
0.12
1.10
43.14
43.14
0.05
Benzofalpyrene
965
3,840
0.01
1.66
1.66
0.00
3.80
98.70
98.70
0.10
0.94
36.86
36.86
0.04
Benzofblfluoranthene
979
2,169
0.01
1.21
1.21
0.00
3.00
77.92
77.92
0.08
0.84
32.94
32.94
0.03
Benzofelpyrene
967
4,300
0.01
1.33
1.33
0.00
2.40
62.34
62.34
0.06
0.65
25.49
25.49
0.03
Benzofg,h,ilperylene
1,095
648
0.02
2.77
2.77
0.00
2.10
54.55
54.55
0.05
0.55
21.57
21.57
0.02
Benzofklfluoranthene
981
1,220
0.01
0.98
0.98
0.00
3.00
77.92
77.92
0.08
0.92
36.08
36.08
0.04
Cl-Chrysenes
929
-
0.02
3.05
3.05
0.00
1.90
49.35
49.35
0.05
0.68
26.67
26.67
0.03
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
-
0.04
5.96
5.96
0.01
5.40
140
140
0.18
1.60
62.75
62.75
0.08
Cl-Fluorenes
611
-
0.01
1.07
1.07
0.00
0.29
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.23
9.02
9.02
0.01
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
-
0.02
3.33
3.33
0.01
0.29
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.28
10.98
10.98
0.02
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
-
0.05
7.35
7.35
0.01
2.80
73
73
0.11
1.20
47.06
47.06
0.07
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
-
0.03
3.47
3.47
0.00
1.00
25.97
25.97
0.03
0.26
10.20
10.20
0.01
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
—
-
0.04
5.41
5.41
—
2.20
57
57
—
0.76
29.80
29.80
—
C2-Fluorenes
686
-
0.01
1.80
1.80
0.00
0.29
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.23
9.02
9.02
0.01
C2-Naphthalenes
510
—
0.08
10.54
10.54
0.02
1.40
36.36
36.36
0.07
1.60
62.75
62.75
0.12
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
-
0.05
7.07
7.07
0.01
1.70
44
44
0.06
0.70
27.45
27.45
0.04
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
-
0.02
3.33
3.33
0.00
0.29
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.20
7.84
7.84
0.01
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
-
0.03
4.16
4.16
0.00
0.69
18
18
0.02
0.35
13.73
13.73
0.01
C3-Fluorenes
769
-
0.02
2.22
2.22
0.00
0.29
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.24
9.41
9.41
0.01
C3-Naphthalenes
581
-
0.13
18.03
18.03
0.03
1.30
33.77
33.77
0.06
1.80
70.59
70.59
0.12
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
-
0.09
12.34
12.34
0.01
1.50
39
39
0.05
0.86
33.73
33.73
0.04
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
-
0.01
1.53
1.53
0.00
0.29
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
—
0.08
11.51
11.51
0.02
0.29
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.66
25.88
25.88
0.04
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
-
0.04
5.69
5.69
0.01
1.00
26
26
0.03
0.52
20.39
20.39
0.02
Chrysene
844
826
0.02
3.05
3.05
0.00
4.30
111.69
111.69
0.13
1.30
50.98
50.98
0.06
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.002
0.26
0.26
0.00
0.75
19.48
19.48
0.02
0.19
7.45
7.45
0.01
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.02
3
3
0.00
7.10
184.42
184.42
0.26
1.80
70.59
70.59
0.10
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.01
1.39
1.39
0.00
0.72
18.70
18.70
0.03
0.37
14.51
14.51
0.03
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
—
0.00
0.57
0.57
0.00
2.20
57.14
57.14
0.05
0.56
21.96
21.96
0.02
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.015
2.08
2.08
0.01
0.36
9.35
9.35
0.02
0.18
7.06
7.06
0.02
Perylene
967
431
0.01
1.10
1.10
0.00
0.81
21.04
21.04
0.02
0.22
8.63
8.63
0.01
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.04
5.27
5.27
0.01
3.70
96.10
96.10
0.16
1.60
62.75
62.75
0.11
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.04
6
6
0.01
9.20
239
239
0.34
2.50
98.04
98.04
0.14
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
0.19
...
...
...
2.31
...
...
...
1.41
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the maximum
COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA,
2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
(ig/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 29 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT16-20
HT16-20
HT16-21
HT16-20-1035
HT16-20-3550
HT16-21-SURF
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/10/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
1-3.5
3.5-5
0-0.5
Coc, PAHi, FCVf
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g oc
Hg/g oc
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
—
-
5.46
0.0546
—
—
0.935
0.00935
—
—
2.73
0.0273
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methy lnaphthalene
446
165,700
9.70
177.66
177.66
0.40
0.14
14.97
14.97
0.03
0.38
13.92
13.92
0.03
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
13.00
238.10
238.10
0.53
0.20
21.39
21.39
0.05
0.30
10.99
10.99
0.02
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
12.000
219.78
219.78
0.45
0.16
17.11
17.11
0.03
0.85
31.14
31.14
0.06
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
1.300
23.81
23.81
0.05
0.01
1.02
1.02
0.00
0.75
0.00
0.00
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
9.90
181.32
181.32
0.31
0.10
10.59
10.59
0.02
1.60
58.61
58.61
0.10
Benzofalanthracene
841
4,153
9.60
176
176
0.21
0.09
9
9
0.01
3.00
110
110
0.13
Benzofalpyrene
965
3,840
8.80
161
161
0.17
0.07
7.49
7.49
0.01
3.00
109.89
109.89
0.11
Benzofblfluoranthene
979
2,169
5.50
100.73
100.73
0.10
0.05
5.35
5.35
0.01
2.90
106.23
106.23
0.11
Benzofelpyrene
967
4,300
5.10
93.41
93.41
0.10
0.04
4.71
4.71
0.00
1.90
69.60
69.60
0.07
Benzofg,h,ilperylene
1,095
648
3.50
64.10
64.10
0.06
0.05
4.81
4.81
0.00
1.50
54.95
54.95
0.05
Benzofklfluoranthene
981
1,220
6.20
113.55
113.55
0.12
0.06
5.88
5.88
0.01
2.40
87.91
87.91
0.09
Cl-Chrysenes
929
-
6.80
124.54
124.54
0.13
0.08
8.34
8.34
0.01
0.75
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
-
24.00
440
440
0.57
0.23
25
25
0.03
3.40
125
125
0.16
Cl-Fluorenes
611
-
3.00
54.95
54.95
0.09
0.04
4.60
4.60
0.01
0.75
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
-
16.00
293.04
293.04
0.66
0.24
25.67
25.67
0.06
0.75
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
-
18.00
329.67
329.67
0.49
0.25
27
27
0.04
2.20
81
81
0.12
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
-
3.10
56.78
56.78
0.06
0.05
5.13
5.13
0.01
0.75
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
—
-
7.40
135.53
135.53
—
0.10
10
10
—
0.75
0
0
—
C2-Fluorenes
686
-
2.40
43.96
43.96
0.06
0.04
3.96
3.96
0.01
0.75
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
—
33.00
604.40
604.40
1.19
0.47
50.27
50.27
0.10
0.75
0
0
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
-
10.00
183.15
183.15
0.25
0.14
15
15
0.02
0.75
0
0
0.00
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
-
0.90
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
3.42
3.42
0.00
0.75
0.00
0.00
0.000
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
-
2.90
53.11
53.11
0.06
0.05
5.67
5.67
0.01
0.75
0.00
0.00
0.000
C3-Fluorenes
769
-
2.10
38.46
38.46
0.05
0.03
3.42
3.42
0.00
0.75
0.00
0.00
0.000
C3-Naphthalenes
581
-
21.00
385
385
0.66
0.32
34
34
0.06
0.75
0
0
0.00
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
-
13.00
238.10
238.10
0.29
0.20
21
21
0.03
0.75
0
0
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
-
0.90
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.75
0.00
0.00
0.000
C4-Naphthalenes
657
—
4.90
89.74
89.74
0.14
0.15
16.04
16.04
0.02
0.75
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
-
7.00
128.21
128.21
0.14
0.11
11.76
11.76
0.01
0.75
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
11.00
201
201
0.24
0.10
10.48
10.48
0.01
3.00
110
110
0.13
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
1.100
20.15
20.15
0.02
0.01
1.06
1.06
0.00
0.46
16.85
16.85
0.015
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
15.00
275
275
0.39
0.17
18
18
0.03
6.30
231
231
0.33
Fluorene
538
26,000
8.000
146.52
146.52
0.27
0.11
11.76
11.76
0.02
1.30
47.62
47.62
0.089
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
—
3.40
62.27
62.27
0.06
0.03
2.89
2.89
0.00
1.30
47.62
47.62
0.043
Naphthalene
385
61,700
7.800
142.86
142.86
0.37
0.16
17.11
17.11
0.04
0.61
22.34
22.34
0.058
Perylene
967
431
0.90
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
2.14
2.14
0.00
0.75
0.00
0.00
0.000
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
21.00
385
385
0.65
0.28
30
30
0.05
6.40
234
234
0.39
Pyrene
697
9,090
26.00
476
476
0.68
0.27
29
29
0.04
7.60
278
278
0.40
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
8.94
...
...
...
0.70
...
...
...
2.46
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the maximum
COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA,
2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
(ig/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 30 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT16-21
HT16-21
HT16-21
HT16-21-SURF-FD
HT16-21-0010
HT16-21-1030
6/10/2016
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
Coc, PAHi, FCVf
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g oc
Hg/g oc
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
—
-
2.25
0.0225
—
—
1.08
0.0108
—
—
0.722
0.00722
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methy lnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.58
25.78
25.78
0.06
0.16
14.81
14.81
0.03
0.01
1.39
1.39
0.00
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.54
24.00
24.00
0.05
0.40
37.04
37.04
0.08
0.01
1.33
1.33
0.00
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
1.50
66.67
66.67
0.14
0.42
38.89
38.89
0.08
0.00
0.55
0.55
0.00
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
1.100
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.16
14.81
14.81
0.03
0.00
0.15
0.15
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
2.70
120
120
0.20
0.62
57.41
57.41
0.10
0.01
0.73
0.73
0.00
Benzofalanthracene
841
4,153
4.90
218
218
0.26
1.40
129.63
129.63
0.15
0.00
1
1
0.00
Benzofalpyrene
965
3,840
4.70
209
209
0.22
1.60
148.15
148.15
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Benzofblfluoranthene
979
2,169
3.70
164
164
0.17
0.83
76.85
76.85
0.08
0.01
0.87
0.87
0.00
Benzofelpyrene
967
4,300
3.00
133
133
0.14
0.88
81.48
81.48
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Benzofg,h,ilperylene
1,095
648
2.10
93
93
0.09
0.55
50.93
50.93
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Benzofklfluoranthene
981
1,220
4.40
196
196
0.20
1.10
101.85
101.85
0.10
0.00
0.26
0.26
0.00
Cl-Chrysenes
929
-
1.10
0
0
0.00
0.62
57.41
57.41
0.06
0.02
2.35
2.35
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
-
6.00
267
267
0.35
2.60
240.74
240.74
0.31
0.03
4
4
0.00
Cl-Fluorenes
611
-
1.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.78
0.78
0.00
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
-
1.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
1.94
1.94
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
-
3.80
169
169
0.25
1.30
120.37
120.37
0.18
0.04
5
5
0.01
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
-
1.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
3.60
3.60
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
—
-
1.10
0
0
—
0.60
55.56
55.56
—
0.04
5
5
—
C2-Fluorenes
686
-
1.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
1.66
1.66
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
—
1.10
0
0
0.00
0.72
66.67
66.67
0.13
0.05
7
7
0.01
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
-
1.10
0
0
0.00
0.51
47.22
47.22
0.06
0.05
6
6
0.01
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
-
1.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
4.29
4.29
0.00
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
-
1.10
0
0
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
4.71
4.71
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
-
1.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
2.08
2.08
0.00
C3-Naphthalenes
581
-
1.10
0
0
0.00
0.52
48.15
48.15
0.08
0.13
18
18
0.03
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
-
1.10
0
0
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.10
14
14
0.02
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
-
1.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
1.66
1.66
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
—
1.10
0
0
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.10
13.85
13.85
0.02
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
-
1.10
0
0
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
5.54
5.54
0.01
Chrysene
844
826
4.80
213
213
0.25
1.30
120.37
120.37
0.14
0.01
1.94
1.94
0.00
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.63
28.00
28.00
0.02
0.18
16.67
16.67
0.01
0.00
0.28
0.28
0.000
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
9.80
436
436
0.62
2.00
185.19
185.19
0.26
0.00
1
1
0.00
Fluorene
538
26,000
2.00
88.89
88.89
0.17
0.40
37.04
37.04
0.07
0.00
0.55
0.55
0.001
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
—
1.80
80
80
0.07
0.59
54.63
54.63
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Naphthalene
385
61,700
1.000
44.44
44.44
0.12
0.40
37.04
37.04
0.10
0.01
1.00
1.00
0.00
Perylene
967
431
1.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
1.14
1.14
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
10.00
444
444
0.75
1.90
175.93
175.93
0.30
0.02
2
2
0.00
Pyrene
697
9,090
12.00
533
533
0.77
3.90
361.11
361.11
0.52
0.02
2
2
0.00
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
4.76
...
...
...
3.11
...
...
...
0.15
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the maximum
COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA,
2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
(ig/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 31 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT16-22
HT16-22
HT16-22
HT16-22-SURF
HT16-22-0010
HT16-22-1030
6/10/2016
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
Coc, PAHi, FCVf
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g oc
Hg/g oc
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
ng/g oc
Coc"
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
—
-
0.679
0.00679
—
—
0.409
0.00409
—
—
0.578
0.00578
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methy lnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.27
40
40
0.09
0.01
2
2
0.00
0.01
1
1
0.00
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.23
34
34
0.08
0.01
1
1
0.00
0.01
1
1
0.00
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
1.20
176.73
176.73
0.36
0.00
0
0
0.00
0.00
1
1
0.00
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.56
82.47
82.47
0.18
0.00
0.12
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.14
0.14
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
1.80
265
265
0.45
0.00
1
1
0.00
0.00
1
1
0.00
Benzofalanthracene
841
4,153
6.30
928
928
1.10
0.00
1
1
0.00
0.00
1
1
0.00
Benzofalpyrene
965
3,840
7.50
1104.57
1104.57
1.14
0.00
0
0
0.00
0.00
0
0
0.00
Benzofblfluoranthene
979
2,169
4.80
706.92
706.92
0.72
0.01
1.69
1.69
0.00
0.01
1.23
1.23
0.00
Benzofelpyrene
967
4,300
4.50
662.74
662.74
0.69
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Benzofg,h,ilperylene
1,095
648
4.20
618.56
618.56
0.56
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Benzofklfluoranthene
981
1,220
5.40
795.29
795.29
0.81
0.00
0.64
0.64
0.00
0.00
0.12
0.12
0.00
Cl-Chrysenes
929
-
2.40
353
353
0.38
0.01
2
2
0.00
0.02
3
3
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
-
9.90
1458
1458
1.89
0.03
6
6
0.01
0.02
4
4
0.01
Cl-Fluorenes
611
-
0.75
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.15
1.15
0.00
0.01
0.99
0.99
0.00
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
-
0.75
0
0
0.00
0.01
2
2
0.01
0.01
2
2
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
-
4.70
692
692
1.03
0.02
6
6
0.01
0.03
6
6
0.01
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
-
1.60
235.64
235.64
0.23
0.01
3
3
0.00
0.03
6
6
0.01
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
—
-
3.20
471
471
—
0.02
6
6
—
0.03
6
6
—
C2-Fluorenes
686
-
0.75
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
1.76
1.76
0.00
0.01
1.90
1.90
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
-
0.75
0
0
0.00
0.03
7
7
0.01
0.04
7
7
0.01
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
-
2.30
339
339
0.45
0.02
6
6
0.01
0.04
7
7
0.01
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
-
0.75
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
2.69
2.69
0.00
0.03
4.50
4.50
0.00
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
-
0.75
0
0
0.00
0.02
4
4
0.00
0.03
4
4
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
-
0.75
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
1.83
1.83
0.00
0.01
2.25
2.25
0.00
C3-Naphthalenes
581
-
1.50
221
221
0.38
0.06
14
14
0.02
0.10
17
17
0.03
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
-
0.75
0
0
0.00
0.05
12
12
0.01
0.08
15
15
0.02
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
-
0.75
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
1.39
1.39
0.00
0.01
2.08
2.08
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
-
0.75
0
0
0.00
0.05
11
11
0.02
0.09
16
16
0.02
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
-
0.75
0
0
0.00
0.02
6
6
0.01
0.04
7
7
0.01
Chrysene
844
826
6.40
943
826
0.98
0.01
2
2
0.00
0.01
2
2
0.00
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
1.10
162.00
162.00
0.14
0.00
0.32
0.32
0.00
0.00
0.19
0.19
0.00
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
11.00
1620
1620
2.29
0.01
1
1
0.00
0.01
1
1
0.00
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.88
129.60
129.60
0.24
0.00
0.95
0.95
0.00
0.00
0.69
0.69
0.00
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
-
3.40
500.74
500.74
0.45
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.37
54.49
54.49
0.14
0.01
1.64
1.64
0.00
0.01
1.45
1.45
0.00
Perylene
967
431
1.50
220.91
220.91
0.23
0.01
1.30
1.30
0.00
0.01
1.35
1.35
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
6.50
957
957
1.61
0.01
3
3
0.01
0.02
3
3
0.00
Pyrene
697
9,090
15.00
2209
2209
3.17
0.01
3
3
0.00
0.02
3
3
0.00
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
19.64
...
...
...
0.15
...
...
...
0.17
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the maximum
COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA,
2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
(ig/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 32 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HT 16-23
HT 16-23
HT 16-23
Sample Name:
HT 16-23-SURF
HT16-23-0005
HT16-23-0515
Sample Date:
6/9/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0.5-1.5
Coc, PAHi, FCVi(a)
Coc, PAHi, Maxi(a)
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g dry
Coc(b)
ESBTU
Hg/gdry
Coc(b)
ESBTU
Hg/gdry
Coc(b)
ESBTU
Hg/g oc
Hg/g oc
wt.
Hg/g oc
FCVi
wt.
Hg/g oc
FCVi
wt.
Hg/g oc
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
-
-
1.09
0.0109
...
...
2.24
0.0224
...
...
1.25
0.0125
...
...
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.05
5
5
0.01
320.00
14285.71
14285.71
32.03
66.00
5280.00
5280.00
11.84
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.05
5
5
0.01
450.00
20089.29
20089.29
44.942
94.00
7520.00
7520.00
16.82
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.26
23.85
23.85
0.049
750.00
33482.14
33400.00
68.024
180.00
14400.00
14400.00
29.33
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.07
6.42
6.42
0.014
31.00
1383.93
1383.93
3.062
7.10
568.00
568.00
1.26
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.56
51
51
0.09
260.00
11607.14
1300.00
2.19
57.00
4560.00
1300.00
2.19
Benzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
1.60
147
147
0.17
220.00
9821.43
4153.00
4.94
54.00
4320.00
4153.00
4.94
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
1.50
138
138
0.14
230.00
10267.86
3840.00
3.98
57.00
4560.00
3840.00
3.98
Benzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
1.50
138
138
0.14
95.00
4241.07
2169.00
2.22
25.00
2000.00
2000.00
2.04
Benzo [ejpyrene
967
4,300
1.00
92
92
0.09
120.00
5357.14
4300.00
4.45
31.00
2480.00
2480.00
2.56
Benzo [g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.86
78.90
78.90
0.07
98.00
4375.00
648.00
0.59
25.00
2000.00
648.00
0.59
Benzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
1.40
128
128
0.13
150.00
6696.43
1220.00
1.24
37.00
2960.00
1220.00
1.24
Cl-Chrysenes
929
-
0.69
63
63
0.07
38.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
17.00
1360.00
1360.00
1.46
C1 -Fluoranthenes/py rene
770
-
1.30
119
119
0.15
450.00
20089.29
20089.29
26.09
110.00
8800.00
8800.00
11.43
Cl-Fluorenes
611
-
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
38.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
13.00
1040.00
1040.00
1.70
Cl-Naphthalenes
444
-
0.24
0
0
0.00
560.00
25000.00
25000.00
56.31
120.00
9600.00
9600.00
21.62
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
-
0.73
67
67
0.10
270.00
12053.57
12053.57
17.99
67.00
5360.00
5360.00
8.00
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
-
0.24
0
0
0.00
38.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
3.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
-
-
0.67
61
61
...
79.00
3526.79
3526.79
...
19.00
1520.00
1520.00
...
C2-Fluorenes
686
-
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
38.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
-
0.24
0
0
0.00
620.00
27678.57
27678.57
54.27
120.00
9600.00
9600.00
18.82
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
-
0.24
0
0
0.00
38.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
15.00
1200.00
1200.00
1.61
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
-
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
38.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
-
0.24
0
0
0.00
38.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
-
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
38.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Naphthalenes
581
-
0.24
0
0
0.00
110.00
4910.71
4910.71
8.45
25.00
2000.00
2000.00
3.44
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
-
0.24
0
0
0.00
38.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
-
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
38.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
-
0.24
0
0
0.00
38.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
-
0.24
0
0
0.00
38.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
1.70
156
156
0.18
220.00
9821.43
826.00
0.98
52.00
4160.00
826.00
0.98
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.31
28.44
28.44
0.03
18.00
803.57
803.57
0.716
4.60
368.00
368.00
0.33
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
3.60
330
330
0.47
380.00
16964.29
16964.29
23.99
91.00
7280.00
7280.00
10.30
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.23
21.10
21.10
0.04
320.00
14285.71
14285.71
26.553
81.00
6480.00
6480.00
12.04
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
-
0.88
80.73
80.73
0.07
69.00
3080.36
3080.36
2.76
18.00
1440.00
1440.00
1.29
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.09
8.26
8.26
0.02
1100.00
49107.14
49107.14
127.55
190.00
15200.00
15200.00
39.48
Perylene
967
431
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
38.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
7.80
624.00
431.00
0.45
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
2.00
183
183
0.31
960.00
42857.14
34300.00
57.55
250.00
20000.00
20000.00
33.56
Pyrene
697
9,090
2.90
266
266
0.38
910.00
40625.00
9090.00
13.04
200.00
16000
9090
13.04
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
2.73
...
...
...
506.95
...
...
...
...
Notes:
(a) )AHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA (2003a).
(b) COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the maximum
COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA
2003a, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
ESBTU= Equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= Final chronic value.
Koc = Organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 33 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HT 16-23
HT 16-23
HT 16-23
Sample Name:
HT16-23-1535
HT16-23-100110-DS
HT16-23-90100
Sample Date:
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
1.5-3.5
10-11
9-10
Coc, PAHi, FCVi(a)
Coc, PAHi, Maxi(a)
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g dry
Coc(b)
ESBTU
Hg/gdry
Coc(b)
ESBTU
Hg/gdry
Coc(b)
ESBTU
Hg/g oc
Hg/g oc
wt.
Hg/g oc
FCVi
wt.
Hg/g oc
FCVi
wt.
Hg/g oc
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
-
-
0.453
0.00453
...
...
1.51
0.0151
...
...
1.55
0.0155
...
...
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
1.50
331
331
0.74
85.00
5629.14
5629.14
12.62
0.09
5.68
5.68
0.01
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
2.20
486
486
1.09
120.00
7947.02
7947.02
17.78
0.13
8.39
8.39
0.02
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
3.60
795
795
1.62
170.00
11258.28
11258.28
22.93
0.16
10
10
0.02
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.16
35.32
35.32
0.08
7.00
463.58
463.58
1.03
0.01
0.47
0.47
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
1.20
265
265
0.45
62.00
4105.96
1300.00
2.19
0.05
3
3
0.01
Benzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
1.10
243
243
0.29
51.00
3377.48
3377.48
4.02
0.05
3
3
0.00
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
1.20
265
265
0.27
57.00
3774.83
3774.83
3.91
0.05
3
3
0.00
Benzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.51
113
113
0.11
24.00
1589.40
1589.40
1.62
0.02
1
1
0.00
Benzo [ejpyrene
967
4,300
0.40
0
0
0.00
19.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
2
2
0.00
Benzo [g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.52
114.79
114.79
0.10
31.00
2052.98
648.00
0.59
0.03
1.94
1.94
0.00
Benzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.79
174
174
0.18
36.00
2384.11
1220.00
1.24
0.03
2
2
0.00
Cl-Chrysenes
929
-
0.40
0
0
0.00
19.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0
0
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/py rene
770
-
2.20
486
486
0.63
91.00
6026
6026
7.83
0.10
6
6
0.01
Cl-Fluorenes
611
-
0.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
19.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
Cl-Naphthalenes
444
-
2.50
552
552
1.24
140.00
9271.52
9271.52
20.88
0.15
10
10
0.02
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
-
1.30
287
287
0.43
63.00
4172
4172
6.23
0.09
6
6
0.01
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
-
0.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
19.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
-
-
0.40
0
0
...
19.50
0.00
0.00
...
0.05
3
3
...
C2-Fluorenes
686
-
0.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
19.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
-
2.80
618
618
1.21
130.00
8609
8609
16.88
0.18
12
12
0.02
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
-
0.40
0
0
0.00
19.50
0
0
0.00
0.06
4
4
0.00
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
-
0.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
19.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
-
0.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
19.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
1.74
1.74
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
-
0.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
19.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Naphthalenes
581
-
0.40
0
0
0.00
19.50
0
0
0.00
0.15
10
10
0.02
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
-
0.40
0
0
0.00
19.50
0
0
0.00
0.07
4
4
0.01
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
-
0.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
19.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
-
0.40
0
0
0.00
19.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
7.10
7.10
0.01
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
-
0.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
19.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
2.58
2.58
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
1.10
243
243
0.29
51.00
3377.48
826.00
0.98
0.05
3
3
0.00
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.10
21.19
21.19
0.02
7.30
483.44
483.44
0.43
0.00
0.29
0.29
0.00
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
1.90
419
419
0.59
76.00
5033
5033
7.12
0.08
5
5
0.01
Fluorene
538
26,000
1.60
353
353
0.66
73.00
4834.44
4834.44
8.99
0.08
4.84
4.84
0.01
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
-
0.38
83.89
83.89
0.08
22.00
1456.95
1456.95
1.31
0.02
1.03
1.03
0.00
Naphthalene
385
61,700
6.40
1413
1413
3.67
320.00
21192.05
21192.05
55.04
0.37
23.87
23.87
0.06
Perylene
967
431
0.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
19.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
4.80
1060
1060
1.78
240.00
15894
15894
26.67
0.20
13
13
0.02
Pyrene
697
9,090
4.20
927
927
1.33
200.00
13245
9090
13.04
0.16
10
10
0.01
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
15.03
...
...
...
202.92
...
...
...
0.26
Notes:
(a) )AHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA (2003a).
(b) COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the maximum
COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA
2003a, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
ESBTU= Equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= Final chronic value.
Koc = Organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 34 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HT 16-23
HT 16-23
HT 16-24
Sample Name:
HT16-23-110130-DS
HT16-23-150160
HT16-24-SURF
Sample Date:
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/9/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
11-13
15-16
0-0.5
Coc, PAHi, FCVi(a)
Coc, PAHi, Maxi(a)
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g dry
Coc(b)
ESBTU
Hg/gdry
Coc(b)
ESBTU
Hg/gdry
Coc(b)
ESBTU
Hg/g oc
Hg/g oc
wt.
Hg/g oc
FCVi
wt.
Hg/g oc
FCVi
wt.
Hg/g oc
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
-
-
0.376
0.00376
...
...
0.802
0.00802
...
...
1.19
0.0119
...
...
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.23
61
61
0.14
0.16
20
20
0.04
0.10
8.40
8.40
0.02
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.34
90
90
0.20
0.23
29
29
0.06
0.05
4.29
4.29
0.01
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.47
125
125
0.25
0.27
34
34
0.07
0.42
35.29
35.29
0.07
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.02
5.32
5.32
0.01
0.01
1.25
1.25
0.00
0.04
3.61
3.61
0.008
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.21
56
56
0.09
0.10
12
12
0.02
0.24
20.17
20.17
0.03
Benzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.14
37
37
0.04
0.10
12
12
0.01
0.48
40.34
40.34
0.05
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.16
43
43
0.04
0.07
8
8
0.01
0.49
41.18
41.18
0.04
Benzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.08
19.95
19.95
0.02
0.03
3.99
3.99
0.00
0.34
28.57
28.57
0.029
Benzo [ejpyrene
967
4,300
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.32
26.89
26.89
0.028
Benzo [g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.09
22.61
22.61
0.02
0.04
4.86
4.86
0.00
0.27
22.69
22.69
0.021
Benzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.10
25.27
25.27
0.03
0.10
12.22
12.22
0.01
0.32
26.89
26.89
0.027
Cl-Chrysenes
929
-
0.07
0
0
0.00
0.05
0
0
0.00
0.22
18.49
18.49
0.02
C1 -Fluoranthenes/py rene
770
-
0.25
66
66
0.09
0.15
19
19
0.02
0.74
62.18
62.18
0.08
Cl-Fluorenes
611
-
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
Cl-Naphthalenes
444
-
0.39
104
104
0.23
0.26
32
32
0.07
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
-
0.21
56
56
0.08
0.11
14
14
0.02
0.47
39.50
39.50
0.06
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
-
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
-
-
0.07
0
0
...
0.05
0
0
...
0.25
21.01
21.01
...
C2-Fluorenes
686
-
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
-
0
93
93
0.18
0.27
34
34
0.07
0.31
26.05
26.05
0.05
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
-
0.07
0
0
0.00
0.05
0
0
0.00
0.27
22.69
22.69
0.03
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
-
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
-
0.07
0
0
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.000
C3-Fluorenes
769
-
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Naphthalenes
581
-
0.07
0
0
0.00
0.13
16
16
0.03
0.29
24.37
24.37
0.04
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
-
0.07
0
0
0.00
0.05
0
0
0.00
0.16
13.45
13.45
0.02
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
-
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
-
0.07
0
0
0.00
0.10
12
12
0.02
0.16
13.45
13.45
0.02
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
-
0.07
0
0
0.00
0.05
0
0
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.000
Chrysene
844
826
0.14
37
37
0.04
0.10
12
12
0.01
0.47
39.50
39.50
0.05
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.02
4.26
4.26
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
5.80
5.80
0.005
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.29
77
77
0.11
0.11
14
14
0.02
1.00
84.03
84.03
0.12
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.20
53
53
0.10
0.11
14
14
0.03
0.20
16.81
16.81
0.03
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
-
0.06
15.96
15.96
0.01
0.02
2.74
2.74
0.00
0.22
18.49
18.49
0.017
Naphthalene
385
61,700
1.00
265.96
265.96
0.69
0.88
109.73
109.73
0.29
0.06
4.71
4.71
0.01
Perylene
967
431
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.73
194
194
0.33
0.31
39
39
0.06
0.87
73.11
73.11
0.12
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.55
146
146
0.21
0.27
34
34
0.05
1.40
117.65
117.65
0.17
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
2.60
...
...
...
0.83
...
...
...
1.15
Notes:
(a) )AHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA (2003a).
(b) COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the maximum
COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA
2003a, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
ESBTU= Equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= Final chronic value.
Koc = Organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 35 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HT 16-24
HT 16-24
HT 16-25
Sample Name:
HT16-24-0010
HT16-24-1030
HT16-25-SURF
Sample Date:
6/12/2016
6/12/2016
6/10/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
Coc, PAHi, FCVi(a)
Coc, PAHi, Maxi(a)
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g dry
Coc(b)
ESBTU
Hg/gdry
Coc(b)
ESBTU
Hg/gdry
Coc(b)
ESBTU
Hg/g oc
Hg/g oc
wt.
Hg/g oc
FCVi
wt.
Hg/g oc
FCVi
wt.
Hg/g oc
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
-
-
0.968
0.00968
...
...
0.768
0.00768
...
...
3.77
0.0377
...
...
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.02
1.55
1.55
0.00
0.02
2.21
2.21
0.00
0.04
1.17
1.17
0.00
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.02
2.27
2.27
0.005
0.02
2.73
2.73
0.01
0.05
1.35
1.35
0.00
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.01
0.99
0.99
0.002
0.01
0.91
0.91
0.002
0.16
4.24
4.24
0.01
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.00
0.07
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.12
0.12
0.00
0.03
0.88
0.88
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.01
0.60
0.60
0.00
0.01
0.95
0.95
0.002
0.14
3.71
3.71
0.01
Benzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.00
0.38
0.38
0.00
0.00
0.51
0.51
0.001
0.52
13.79
13.79
0.02
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.00
0.25
0.25
0.00
0.00
0.55
0.55
0.001
0.64
16.98
16.98
0.02
Benzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.00
0.40
0.40
0.00
0.01
0.69
0.69
0.001
0.80
21.22
21.22
0.02
Benzo [ejpyrene
967
4,300
0.00
0.42
0.42
0.00
0.01
0.91
0.91
0.001
0.55
14.59
14.59
0.02
Benzo [g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.01
0.62
0.62
0.00
0.01
1.56
1.56
0.00
0.55
14.59
14.59
0.01
Benzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.65
17.24
17.24
0.02
Cl-Chrysenes
929
-
0.01
1.00
1.00
0.00
0.02
2.21
2.21
0.002
0.25
6.63
6.63
0.01
C1 -Fluoranthenes/py rene
770
-
0.02
2.17
2.17
0.00
0.03
4.17
4.17
0.005
0.73
19.36
19.36
0.03
Cl-Fluorenes
611
-
0.00
0.46
0.46
0.00
0.01
0.91
0.91
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
Cl-Naphthalenes
444
-
0.03
2.69
2.69
0.01
0.03
3.39
3.39
0.008
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
-
0.03
2.79
2.79
0.00
0.04
5.47
5.47
0.008
0.32
8.49
8.49
0.01
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
-
0.01
1.14
1.14
0.00
0.01
1.69
1.69
0.00
0.22
5.84
5.84
0.01
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
-
-
0.03
2.69
2.69
...
0.01
1.00
1.00
...
0.35
9.28
9.28
...
C2-Fluorenes
686
-
0.01
0.80
0.80
0.00
0.01
1.56
1.56
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
-
0.05
5.17
5.17
0.01
0.07
8.98
8.98
0.018
0.23
6.10
6.10
0.01
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
-
0.03
3.00
3.00
0.00
0.05
6.51
6.51
0.009
0.24
6.37
6.37
0.01
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
-
0.01
0.88
0.88
0.00
0.02
2.08
2.08
0.00
0.14
3.71
3.71
0.00
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
-
0.02
1.76
1.76
0.00
0.03
4.04
4.04
0.004
0.17
4.51
4.51
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
-
0.01
0.89
0.89
0.00
0.01
1.82
1.82
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Naphthalenes
581
-
0.07
7.44
7.44
0.01
0.14
18.23
18.23
0.031
0.24
6.37
6.37
0.01
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
-
0.04
4.55
4.55
0.01
0.07
8.98
8.98
0.011
0.27
7.16
7.16
0.01
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
-
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
-
0.07
6.71
6.71
0.01
0.11
14.32
14.32
0.022
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
-
0.03
3.10
3.10
0.00
0.05
6.25
6.25
0.007
0.17
4.51
4.51
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.01
0.99
0.99
0.00
0.02
1.95
1.95
0.002
0.69
18.30
18.30
0.02
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.00
0.07
0.07
0.000
0.00
0.23
0.23
0.00
0.15
3.98
3.98
0.004
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.01
0.66
0.66
0.00
0.01
0.83
0.83
0.001
1.10
29.18
29.18
0.04
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.01
0.56
0.56
0.001
0.01
0.74
0.74
0.001
0.15
3.98
3.98
0.01
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
-
0.00
0.12
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.25
0.25
0.00
0.50
13.26
13.26
0.01
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.04
4.55
4.55
0.01
0.04
4.69
4.69
0.01
0.07
1.91
1.91
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.00
0.45
0.45
0.00
0.01
1.09
1.09
0.00
0.19
5.04
5.04
0.01
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.02
1.76
1.76
0.00
0.02
2.73
2.73
0.005
0.49
13.00
13.00
0.02
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.02
1.65
1.65
0.00
0.02
2.47
2.47
0.004
1.10
29.18
29.18
0.04
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
0.09
...
...
...
0.16
...
...
...
0.38
Notes:
(a) )AHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA (2003a).
(b) COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the maximum
COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA
2003a, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
ESBTU= Equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= Final chronic value.
Koc = Organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 36 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HT 16-25
HT 16-25
HT 16-25
Sample Name:
HT16-25-SURF-FD
HT16-25-0010
HT16-25-1030
Sample Date:
6/10/2016
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
Coc, PAHi, FCVi(a)
Coc, PAHi, Maxi(a)
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g dry
Coc(b)
ESBTU
Hg/gdry
Coc(b)
ESBTU
Hg/gdry
Coc(b)
ESBTU
Hg/g oc
Hg/g oc
wt.
Hg/g oc
FCVi
wt.
Hg/g oc
FCVi
wt.
Hg/g oc
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
-
-
3.88
0.0388
...
...
2.61
0.0261
...
...
0.769
0.00769
...
...
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.05
1.29
1.29
0.00
0.066
2.53
2.53
0.01
0.01
1.05
1.05
0.00
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.06
1.52
1.52
0.003
0.170
6.51
6.51
0.015
0.01
1.13
1.13
0.0025
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.16
4.12
4.12
0.008
0.250
9.58
9.58
0.020
0.01
0.69
0.69
0.0014
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.04
1.01
1.01
0.00
0.068
2.61
2.61
0.006
0.00
0.13
0.13
0.0003
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.15
3.87
3.87
0.007
0.340
13.03
13.03
0.02
0.01
0.79
0.79
0.0013
Benzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.64
16.49
16.49
0.020
0.840
32.18
32.18
0.04
0.01
1.30
1.30
0.0015
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.71
18.30
18.30
0.019
0.760
29.12
29.12
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0000
Benzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.82
21.13
21.13
0.022
0.620
23.75
23.75
0.02
0.01
1.82
1.82
0.0019
Benzo [ejpyrene
967
4,300
0.58
14.95
14.95
0.02
0.480
18.39
18.39
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0000
Benzo [g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.58
14.95
14.95
0.01
0.300
11.49
11.49
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Benzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.71
18.30
18.30
0.02
0.720
27.59
27.59
0.03
0.01
1.09
1.09
0.0011
Cl-Chrysenes
929
-
0.37
9.54
9.54
0.01
0.44
16.86
16.86
0.018
0.02
2.34
2.34
0.003
C1 -Fluoranthenes/py rene
770
-
0.80
20.62
20.62
0.027
1.20
45.98
45.98
0.060
0.03
3.25
3.25
0.004
Cl-Fluorenes
611
-
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.085
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Cl-Naphthalenes
444
-
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.085
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
1.56
1.56
0.004
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
-
0.30
7.73
7.73
0.012
0.65
24.90
24.90
0.037
0.02
2.99
2.99
0.004
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
-
0.26
6.70
6.70
0.01
0.28
10.73
10.73
0.011
0.02
2.99
2.99
0.0030
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
-
-
0.45
11.60
11.60
...
0.42
16.09
16.09
...
0.03
3.51
3.51
...
C2-Fluorenes
686
-
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.085
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.81
0.81
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
-
0.28
7.22
7.22
0.014
0.28
10.73
10.73
0.021
0.03
3.38
3.38
0.007
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
-
0.27
6.96
6.96
0.009
0.45
17.24
17.24
0.023
0.03
4.03
4.03
0.005
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
-
0.19
4.90
4.90
0.00
0.17
6.51
6.51
0.01
0.03
3.90
3.90
0.0035
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
-
0.21
5.41
5.41
0.006
0.20
7.66
7.66
0.008
0.03
3.25
3.25
0.003
C3-Fluorenes
769
-
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.085
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
1.18
1.18
0.0015
C3-Naphthalenes
581
-
0.27
6.96
6.96
0.012
0.31
11.88
11.88
0.020
0.05
6.89
6.89
0.012
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
-
0.37
9.54
9.54
0.012
0.41
15.71
15.71
0.019
0.06
7.54
7.54
0.009
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
-
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.085
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.85
0.85
0.0007
C4-Naphthalenes
657
-
0.15
3.87
3.87
0.006
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.05
5.85
5.85
0.009
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
-
0.24
6.19
6.19
0.007
0.33
12.64
12.64
0.014
0.03
4.16
4.16
0.005
Chrysene
844
826
0.83
21.39
21.39
0.025
0.85
32.57
32.57
0.039
0.02
2.34
2.34
0.003
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.17
4.38
4.38
0.00
0.150
5.75
5.75
0.01
0.00
0.30
0.30
0.0003
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
1.00
25.77
25.77
0.036
1.800
68.97
68.97
0.10
0.02
1.95
1.95
0.003
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.15
3.87
3.87
0.007
0.310
11.88
11.88
0.02
0.01
0.66
0.66
0.0012
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
-
0.52
13.40
13.40
0.01
0.420
16.09
16.09
0.01
0.01
0.69
0.69
0.0006
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.07
1.80
1.80
0.00
0.170
6.51
6.51
0.02
0.02
2.21
2.21
0.01
Perylene
967
431
0.22
5.67
5.67
0.01
0.19
7.28
7.28
0.01
0.01
1.08
1.08
0.0011
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.48
12.37
12.37
0.021
1.100
42.15
42.15
0.07
0.02
2.47
2.47
0.004
Pyrene
697
9,090
1.30
33.51
33.51
0.048
1.800
68.97
68.97
0.10
0.02
2.86
2.86
0.004
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
0.41
...
...
...
0.81
...
...
...
0.10
Notes:
(a) )AHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA (2003a).
(b) COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the maximum
COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA
2003a, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
ESBTU= Equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= Final chronic value.
Koc = Organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 37 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HT 16-26
HT 16-26
HT 16-26
Sample Name:
HT16-26-SURF
HT16-26-0010
HT16-26-1030
Sample Date:
6/10/2016
6/12/2016
6/12/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
Coc, PAHi, FCVi(a)
Coc, PAHi, Maxi(a)
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g dry
Coc(b)
ESBTU
Hg/gdry
Coc(b)
ESBTU
Hg/gdry
Coc(b)
ESBTU
Hg/g oc
Hg/g oc
wt.
Hg/g oc
FCVi
wt.
Hg/g oc
FCVi
wt.
Hg/g oc
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
-
-
3.97
0.0397
...
...
1.28
0.0128
...
...
0.679
0.00679
...
...
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.019
0.48
0.48
0.00
0.02
1.72
1.72
0.00
0.02
2.36
2.36
0.01
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.021
0.53
0.53
0.00
0.03
2.19
2.19
0.00
0.02
2.65
2.65
0.01
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.024
0.60
0.60
0.00
0.02
1
1
0.00
0.01
1.28
1.28
0.00
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.0130
0.33
0.33
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.15
0.15
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.039
0.98
0.98
0.00
0
1
1
0.00
0.01
1.22
1.22
0.00
Benzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.190
4.79
4.79
0.01
0
1
1
0.00
0.01
0.94
0.94
0.00
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.250
6.30
6.30
0.01
0
1
1
0.00
0.01
0.82
0.82
0.00
Benzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.290
7.30
7.30
0.01
0.01
1
1
0.00
0.01
1.18
1.18
0.00
Benzo [ejpyrene
967
4,300
0.230
5.79
5.79
0.01
0.01
1
1
0.00
0.01
1.27
1.27
0.00
Benzo [g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.240
6.05
6.05
0.01
0.01
1
1
0.00
0.02
2.21
2.21
0.00
Benzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.300
7.56
7.56
0.01
0.01
0
0
0.00
0.01
0.74
0.74
0.00
Cl-Chrysenes
929
-
0.100
2.52
2.52
0.00
0.02
1.17
1.17
0.00
0.02
2.21
2.21
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/py rene
770
-
0.30
7.56
7.56
0.01
0
3
3
0.00
0.03
5
5
0.01
Cl-Fluorenes
611
-
0.035
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.56
0.56
0.00
0.01
0.99
0.99
0.00
Cl-Naphthalenes
444
-
0.035
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
2.73
2.73
0.01
0.02
3.39
3.39
0.01
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
-
0.120
3.02
3.02
0.00
0.05
4
4
0.01
0.04
6.04
6.04
0.01
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
-
0.080
2.02
2.02
0.00
0.02
1.25
1.25
0.00
0.02
2.50
2.50
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
-
-
0.15
3.78
3.78
...
0.04
3
3
...
0.04
5.45
5.45
...
C2-Fluorenes
686
-
0.035
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.86
0.86
0.00
0.01
1.77
1.77
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
-
0.08
1.89
1.89
0.00
0.07
5.08
5.08
0.01
0.06
9.43
9.43
0.02
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
-
0.11
2.77
2.77
0.00
0.04
3.20
3.20
0.00
0.05
7.07
7.07
0.01
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
-
0.035
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
1.09
1.09
0.00
0.01
2.06
2.06
0.00
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
-
0.07
1.84
1.84
0.00
0.02
1.88
1.88
0.00
0.02
2.80
2.80
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
-
0.035
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.78
0.78
0.00
0.01
1.47
1.47
0.00
C3-Naphthalenes
581
-
0.13
3.27
3.27
0.01
0.10
7.81
7.81
0.01
0.13
19.15
19.15
0.03
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
-
0.11
2.77
2.77
0.00
0.06
4.77
4.77
0.01
0.07
10.16
10.16
0.01
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
-
0.035
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
-
0.08
1.89
1.89
0.00
0.08
6.56
6.56
0.01
0.10
14.29
14.29
0.02
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
-
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
3.05
3.05
0.00
0.04
6.33
6.33
0.01
Chrysene
844
826
0.310
7.81
7.81
0.01
0
1
1
0.00
0.02
2.50
2.50
0.00
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.0620
1.56
1.56
0.00
0.00
0
0
0.00
0.00
0.27
0.27
0.00
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.500
12.59
12.59
0.02
0
1
1
0.00
0.01
2
2
0.00
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.030
0.76
0.76
0.00
0.01
1
1
0.00
0.01
1.09
1.09
0.00
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
-
0.220
5.54
5.54
0.00
0.00
0
0
0.00
0.00
0.54
0.54
0.00
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.03
0.81
0.81
0.00
0.04
3.05
3.05
0.01
0.03
3.83
3.83
0.01
Perylene
967
431
0.079
1.99
1.99
0.00
0.01
0.63
0.63
0.00
0.01
1.22
1.22
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.180
4.53
4.53
0.01
0
3
3
0.00
0.03
4
4
0.01
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.480
12.09
12.09
0.02
0
3
3
0.00
0.02
3
3
0.00
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
0.15
...
...
...
0.10
...
...
...
0.18
Notes:
(a) )AHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA (2003a).
(b) COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the maximum
COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA
2003a, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
ESBTU= Equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= Final chronic value.
Koc = Organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 38 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HT 16-27
HT 16-27
HT 16-27
Sample Name:
HT16-27-SURF
HT16-27-0010
HT16-27-1020
Sample Date:
6/9/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
1-2
Coc, PAHi, FCVi(a)
Coc, PAHi, Maxi(a)
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g dry
Coc(b)
ESBTU
Hg/gdry
Coc(b)
ESBTU
Hg/gdry
Coc(b)
ESBTU
Hg/g oc
Hg/g oc
wt.
Hg/g oc
FCVi
wt.
Hg/g oc
FCVi
wt.
Hg/g oc
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
-
-
2.49
0.0249
...
...
1.5
0.015
...
...
2.45
0.0245
...
...
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.04
2
2
0.00
0.09
6
6
0.01
0.24
10
10
0.02
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.05
2
2
0.00
0.29
0
0
0.00
1
49
49
0.11
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.13
5
5
0.01
0.94
63
63
0.13
1.20
49
49
0.10
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.110
4.42
4.42
0.01
0.15
10.00
10.00
0.02
0.16
7
7
0.01
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.44
18
18
0.03
0.76
51
51
0.09
1
49
49
0.08
Benzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
1.20
48
48
0.06
1.50
100
100
0.12
1.50
61
61
0.07
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
1.10
44
44
0.05
1.50
100
100
0.10
1.40
57
57
0.06
Benzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.76
31
31
0.03
0.76
51
51
0.05
0.68
28
28
0.03
Benzo [ejpyrene
967
4,300
0.74
29.72
29.72
0.03
0.90
60.00
60.00
0.06
0.60
0.00
0.00
0.00
Benzo [g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.54
21.69
21.69
0.02
0.69
46
46
0.04
0.60
24
24
0.02
Benzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.75
30.12
30.12
0.03
1.10
73
73
0.07
1.20
49
49
0.05
Cl-Chrysenes
929
-
0.82
33
33
0.04
0.69
46.00
46.00
0.05
0.60
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/py rene
770
-
1.90
76
76
0.10
3.10
207
207
0.27
1
0
0
0.00
Cl-Fluorenes
611
-
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.29
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.60
0.00
0.00
0.00
Cl-Naphthalenes
444
-
0.13
0
0
0.00
0.29
0
0
0.00
1
0
0
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
-
1.20
48
48
0.07
1.80
120
120
0.18
1
0
0
0.00
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
-
0.37
14.86
14.86
0.01
0.29
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.60
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
-
-
0.76
31
31
...
0.74
49
49
...
0.60
0
0
...
C2-Fluorenes
686
-
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.29
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.60
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
-
0.13
0
0
0.00
0.96
64
64
0.13
1
0
0
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
-
0.79
32
32
0.04
0.63
42
42
0.06
0.60
0
0
0.00
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
-
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.29
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.60
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
-
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.29
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.60
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
-
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.29
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.60
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Naphthalenes
581
-
0.27
11
11
0.02
1.10
73
73
0.13
0.60
0
0
0.00
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
-
0.32
13
13
0.02
0.29
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.60
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
-
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.29
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.60
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
-
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.29
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.60
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
-
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.29
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.60
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
1.20
48
48
0.06
1.60
107
107
0.13
1.50
61
61
0.07
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.190
7.63
7.63
0.01
0.15
10.00
10.00
0.01
0.13
5
5
0.00
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
2.00
80
80
0.11
2.30
153
153
0.22
2
98
98
0.14
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.15
6
6
0.01
0.73
49
49
0.09
1
49
49
0.09
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
-
0.48
19.28
19.28
0.02
0.53
35.33
35.33
0.03
0.42
17
17
0.02
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.17
7
7
0.02
0.29
0
0
0.00
1
0
0
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.29
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.60
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
1.20
48
48
0.08
2
153
153
0.26
3
127
127
0.21
Pyrene
697
9,090
2.30
92
92
0.13
4.90
327
327
0.47
6
229
229
0.33
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
1.00
...
...
...
2.69
...
...
...
1.29
Notes:
(a) )AHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA (2003a).
(b) COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the maximum
COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA
2003a, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
ESBTU= Equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= Final chronic value.
Koc = Organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 39 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HT 16-27
HT 16-27
Sample Name:
HT16-27-2030
HT16-27-3040
Sample Date:
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
2-3
3-4
Coc, PAHi, FCVi(a)
Coc, PAHi, Maxi(a)
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g dry
Coc(b)
ESBTU
Hg/gdry
Coc(b)
ESBTU
Hg/g oc
Hg/g oc
wt.
Hg/g oc
FCVi
wt.
Hg/g oc
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
-
-
1.11
0.0111
...
...
0.45
0.0045
...
...
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.16
14
14
0.03
0.04
9.78
9.78
0.02
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.11
10
10
0.02
0.04
8.00
8.00
0.02
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.300
27.03
27.03
0.06
0.08
18
18
0.04
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.025
2
2
0.00
0.01
1.87
1.87
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.21
19
19
0.03
0.06
13.78
13.78
0.02
Benzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.27
24.32
24.32
0.03
0.08
19
19
0.02
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.22
19.82
19.82
0.02
0.07
16
16
0.02
Benzo [b] fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.12
10.81
10.81
0.01
0.04
8
8
0.01
Benzo [ejpyrene
967
4,300
0.13
11.71
11.71
0.01
0.04
9.56
9.56
0.01
Benzo [g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.10
9.01
9.01
0.01
0.04
8.67
8.67
0.01
Benzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.17
15.32
15.32
0.02
0.05
11.11
11.11
0.01
Cl-Chrysenes
929
-
0.15
13.51
13.51
0.01
0.05
10.89
10.89
0.01
C1 -Fluoranthenes/py rene
770
-
0.65
59
59
0.08
0.20
44
44
0.06
Cl-Fluorenes
611
-
0.09
7.75
7.75
0.01
0.03
5.78
5.78
0.01
Cl-Naphthalenes
444
-
0.18
16
16
0.04
0.06
12.44
12.44
0.03
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
-
0.50
45
45
0.07
0.16
36
36
0.05
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
-
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
-
-
0.20
18.02
18.02
...
0.07
14.67
14.67
...
C2-Fluorenes
686
-
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
-
0.70
63
63
0.12
0.21
47
47
0.09
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
-
0.19
17.12
17.12
0.02
0.07
14.89
14.89
0.02
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
-
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
-
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
-
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Naphthalenes
581
-
0.43
39
39
0.07
0.15
33.33
33.33
0.06
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
-
0.13
11.71
11.71
0.01
0.05
11.78
11.78
0.01
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
-
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
-
0.08
7.21
7.21
0.01
0.05
12.00
12.00
0.02
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
-
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.29
26.13
26.13
0.03
0.09
20
20
0.02
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.028
2.52
2.52
0.002
0.01
1.87
1.87
0.00
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.42
38
38
0.05
0.13
29
29
0.04
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.190
17
17
0.03
0.05
11.11
11.11
0.02
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
-
0.08
7.30
7.30
0.01
0.03
5.56
5.56
0.00
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.170
15
15
0.04
0.07
14.44
14.44
0.04
Perylene
967
431
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.63
57
57
0.10
0.18
40
40
0.07
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.79
71.17
71.17
0.10
0.26
58
58
0.08
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
1.00
...
...
...
0.78
Notes:
(a) )AHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA (2003a).
(b) COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration in
sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the maximum
COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA
2003a, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
ESBTU= Equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= Final chronic value.
Koc = Organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 40 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT16-28
HT16-28
HT16-28
HT16-28-SURF
HT16-28-0010
HT16-28-1020
6/14/2016
6/12/2016
6/12/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
1-2
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi"
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g oc
Hg/g oc
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
-
-
4.42
0.0442
—
—
2.87
0.0287
—
—
0.547
0.00547
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1-Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.02
0
0
0.00
0.08
2.72
2.72
0.01
0.03
5.85
5.85
0.01
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.02
0
0
0.00
0.09
3.14
3.14
0.007
0.03
6.22
6.22
0.01
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.02
0.54
0.54
0.001
0.11
3.83
3.83
0.008
0.04
6.40
6.40
0.01
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.01
0.32
0.32
0.001
0.03
1.18
1.18
0.003
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.05
1
1
0.00
0.16
5.57
5.57
0.01
0.03
6.03
6.03
0.01
Benzo[a]anthracene
841
4,153
0.38
9
9
0.01
0.46
16.03
16.03
0.02
0.05
9.69
9.69
0.01
Benzofalpyrene
965
3,840
0.46
10
10
0.01
0.53
18.47
18.47
0.02
0.05
9.32
9.32
0.01
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.61
14
14
0.01
0.51
17.77
17.77
0.02
0.05
9.51
9.51
0.01
Benzofelpyrene
967
4,300
0.44
10
10
0.01
0.41
14.29
14.29
0.01
0.04
7.13
7.13
0.01
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.42
9.50
9.50
0.01
0.41
14.29
14.29
0.01
0.04
6.58
6.58
0.01
Benzofklfluoranthene
981
1,220
0.62
14
14
0.01
0.54
18.82
18.82
0.02
0.05
9.32
9.32
0.01
Cl-Chrysenes
929
-
0.20
5
5
0.00
0.27
9.41
9.41
0.01
0.04
6.58
6.58
0.01
C 1-Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
-
0.42
10
10
0.01
0.79
27.53
27.53
0.04
0.11
20.11
20.11
0.03
Cl-Fluorenes
611
-
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
3.66
3.66
0.01
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
-
0.03
0
0
0.00
0.12
4.18
4.18
0.01
0.05
8.23
8.23
0.02
C 1-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
-
0.14
3
3
0.00
0.46
16.03
16.03
0.02
0.14
25.59
25.59
0.04
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
-
0.11
2
2
0.00
0.21
7.32
7.32
0.007
0.03
5.12
5.12
0.01
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
-
-
0.26
6
6
...
0.38
13.24
13.24
...
0.08
14.26
14.26
...
C2-Fluorenes
686
-
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.12
4.18
4.18
0.01
0.02
4.20
4.20
0.01
C2-Naphthalenes
510
-
0.11
2
2
0.00
0.45
15.68
15.68
0.03
0.25
45.70
45.70
0.09
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
-
0.12
3
3
0.00
0.46
16.03
16.03
0.02
0.08
15.17
15.17
0.02
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
-
0.08
1.83
1.83
0.00
0.14
4.88
4.88
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
-
0.11
2
2
0.00
0.21
7.32
7.32
0.01
0.03
6.22
6.22
0.01
C3-Fluorenes
769
-
0.06
1.40
1.40
0.00
0.15
5.23
5.23
0.01
0.02
4.39
4.39
0.01
C3-Naphthalenes
581
-
0.15
3
3
0.01
0.68
23.69
23.69
0.04
0.27
49.36
49.36
0.08
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
-
0.17
4
4
0.00
0.48
16.72
16.72
0.02
0.09
15.72
15.72
0.02
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
-
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
-
0.07
2
2
0.00
0.44
15.33
15.33
0.02
0.13
23.77
23.77
0.04
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
-
0.10
2
2
0.00
0.32
11.15
11.15
0.01
0.06
10.42
10.42
0.01
Chrysene
844
826
0.66
15
15
0.02
0.63
21.95
21.95
0.03
0.08
13.71
13.71
0.02
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.13
2.94
2.94
0.00
0.11
3.83
3.83
0.003
0.02
2.74
2.74
0.00
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.90
20
20
0.03
0.05
1.57
1.57
0.00
0.13
23.77
23.77
0.03
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.04
0.84
0.84
0.00
0.10
3.48
3.48
0.006
0.04
6.40
6.40
0.01
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
-
0.41
9.28
9.28
0.01
0.34
11.85
11.85
0.01
0.03
4.75
4.75
0.00
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.02
0.43
0.43
0.00
0.08
2.82
2.82
0.01
0.02
3.84
3.84
0.01
Perylene
967
431
0.12
2.71
2.71
0.00
0.15
5.23
5.23
0.005
0.02
3.29
3.29
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.27
6
6
0.01
0.64
22.30
22.30
0.04
0.13
23.77
23.77
0.04
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.92
21
21
0.03
1.10
38.33
38.33
0.05
0.17
31
31
0.04
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
0.23
...
...
...
0.52
...
...
...
0.61
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration
in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the
maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the
PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
fj.g/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 41 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT16-28
HT16-28
HT16-29
HT16-28-6575
HT16-28-7590
HT16-29-SURF
6/12/2016
6/12/2016
6/14/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
6.5-7.5
7.5-9
0-0.5
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi"
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g oc
H g/g oc
ng/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
-
-
1.51
0.0151
—
—
11.8
0.118
—
—
0.931
0.00931
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.10
6.42
6.42
0.01
2.10
18
18
0.04
0.06
7
7
0.02
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.12
7.95
7.95
0.02
2.80
24
24
0.05
0.43
46
46
0.10
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.01
0.58
0.58
0.00
2.70
23
23
0.05
0.43
46
46
0.09
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.00
0.19
0.19
0.00
1.00
8.47
8.47
0.02
0.43
46.19
46.19
0.10
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.01
0.64
0.64
0.00
5.10
43
43
0.07
0.52
56
56
0.09
Benzo[a]anthracene
841
4,153
0.02
1.06
1.06
0.00
9.70
82
82
0.10
1.10
118
118
0.14
Benzofalpyrene
965
3,840
0.01
0.86
0.86
0.00
6.90
58
58
0.06
1.00
107
107
0.11
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.02
1.06
1.06
0.00
5.20
44.07
44.07
0.05
1.10
118.15
118.15
0.12
Benzofelpyrene
967
4,300
0.01
0.79
0.79
0.00
5.20
44.07
44.07
0.05
0.70
75.19
75.19
0.08
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.02
0.99
0.99
0.00
3.10
26.27
26.27
0.02
0.43
46.19
46.19
0.04
Benzofklfluoranthene
981
1,220
0.01
0.86
0.86
0.00
4.80
40.68
40.68
0.04
0.95
102.04
102.04
0.10
Cl-Chrysenes
929
-
0.02
1.06
1.06
0.00
11.00
93
93
0.10
0.22
0
0
0.00
C 1-Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
-
0.03
2
2
0.00
29.00
246
246
0.32
1.10
118
118
0.15
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.01
0.86
0.86
0.00
3.20
27.12
27.12
0.04
0.22
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
-
0.15
9.93
9.93
0.02
1.40
0
0
0.00
0.22
0
0
0.00
C 1-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.05
4
4
0.01
24.00
203
203
0.30
0.53
57
57
0.08
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
-
0.02
1.26
1.26
0.00
8.70
73.73
73.73
0.07
0.22
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
-
--
0.04
2.38
2.38
—
16.00
136
136
—
0.51
55
55
—
C2-Fluorenes
686
-
0.02
1.19
1.19
0.00
4.20
35.59
35.59
0.05
0.22
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
-
0.42
28
28
0.05
17
144
144
0.28
0.54
58
58
0.11
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
-
0.05
3
3
0.00
18.00
153
153
0.20
0.22
0
0
0.00
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.02
1.13
1.13
0.00
4.80
40.68
40.68
0.04
0.22
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
-
0.03
1.79
1.79
0.00
7.60
64
64
0.07
0.22
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
--
0.02
1.26
1.26
0.00
4.20
35.59
35.59
0.05
0.22
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Naphthalenes
581
-
0.35
23
23
0.04
20.00
169
169
0.29
0.22
0
0
0.00
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
--
0.08
5
5
0.01
25.00
212
212
0.26
0.22
0
0
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
-
0.01
0.66
0.66
0.00
1.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.22
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
-
0.13
8.61
8.61
0.01
9.40
80
80
0.12
0.22
0
0
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
-
0.04
2.65
2.65
0.00
14.00
119
119
0.13
0.22
0
0
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.02
1.59
1.59
0.00
12.00
102
102
0.12
1.30
140
140
0.17
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.00
0.25
0.25
0.00
1.30
11.02
11.02
0.01
0.20
21.48
21.48
0.02
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.03
2
2
0.00
12.00
102
102
0.14
2.70
290
290
0.41
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.01
0.86
0.86
0.00
2.80
24
24
0.04
0.43
46
46
0.09
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
-
0.01
0.50
0.50
0.00
2.60
22.03
22.03
0.02
0.58
62.30
62.30
0.06
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.05
3.44
3.44
0.01
2.80
23.73
23.73
0.06
0.43
46.19
46.19
0.12
Perylene
967
431
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.22
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.04
3
3
0.00
10.00
85
85
0.14
2.20
236
236
0.40
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.04
2
2
0.00
25.00
212
212
0.30
3.10
333
333
0.48
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
0.19
...
...
...
3.53
...
...
...
2.97
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration
in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the
maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the
PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
fj.g/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 42 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT16-29
HT16-29
HT16-29
HT16-29-1020
HT16-29-2035
HT16-29-3550
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
1-2
2-3.5
3.5-5
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi"
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g oc
H g/g oc
ng/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
-
-
2.41
0.0241
—
—
4.09
0.0409
—
—
0.666
0.00666
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
2.60
108
108
0.24
9.70
237.16
237.16
0.53
0.03
4.35
4.35
0.01
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
2.00
83
83
0.19
8.80
215.16
215.16
0.48
0.02
3.00
3.00
0.01
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
4.40
183
183
0.37
14.00
342
342
0.70
0.03
4.80
4.80
0.01
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.82
34.02
34.02
0.08
1.80
44.01
44.01
0.10
0.01
0.84
0.84
0.002
Anthracene
594
1,300
5.40
224
224
0.38
14.00
342
342
0.58
0.04
5.56
5.56
0.01
Benzo[a]anthracene
841
4,153
9.20
382
382
0.45
18.00
440
440
0.52
0.05
7.06
7.06
0.01
Benzofalpyrene
965
3,840
7.50
311
311
0.32
16.00
391
391
0.41
0.06
8.56
8.56
0.01
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
5.20
216
216
0.22
11.00
269
269
0.27
0.03
5.11
5.11
0.005
Benzofelpyrene
967
4,300
4.40
183
183
0.19
8.80
215
215
0.22
0.04
5.86
5.86
0.006
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
2.30
95.44
95.44
0.09
8.80
215.16
215.16
0.20
0.06
8.41
8.41
0.008
Benzofklfluoranthene
981
1,220
6.20
257
257
0.26
13.00
318
318
0.32
0.03
4.50
4.50
0.005
Cl-Chrysenes
929
-
6.90
286
286
0.31
11.00
269
269
0.29
0.05
7.36
7.36
0.01
C 1-Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
-
20.00
830
830
1.08
38.00
929
929
1.21
0.14
21.02
21.02
0.03
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
2.10
87.14
87.14
0.14
4.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
2.55
2.55
0.00
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
-
2.70
112
112
0.25
11.00
269
269
0.61
0.03
5.11
5.11
0.01
C 1-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
15.00
622
622
0.93
33.00
807
807
1.20
0.12
18.02
18.02
0.03
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
-
3.60
149.38
149.38
0.15
4.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
5.56
5.56
0.01
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
-
--
6.90
286
286
—
11.00
269
269
—
0.07
9.76
9.76
—
C2-Fluorenes
686
-
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
2.70
2.70
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
-
12.00
498
498
0.98
40.00
978
978
1.92
0.11
16.52
16.52
0.03
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
-
7.10
295
295
0.39
13.00
318
318
0.43
0.08
12.31
12.31
0.02
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
4.50
4.50
0.00
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
-
2.40
99.59
99.59
0.10
4.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
5.26
5.26
0.006
C3-Fluorenes
769
--
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
2.70
2.70
0.00
C3-Naphthalenes
581
-
9.10
378
378
0.65
25.00
611
611
1.05
0.13
19.52
19.52
0.03
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
--
4.60
191
191
0.23
9.30
227
227
0.27
0.11
16.52
16.52
0.02
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
-
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
-
2.20
91
91
0.14
4.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.09
12.76
12.76
0.02
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
-
2.10
87.14
87.14
0.10
4.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
8.41
8.41
0.009
Chrysene
844
826
9.40
390
390
0.46
18.00
440
440
0.52
0.06
8.41
8.41
0.01
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
1.30
53.94
53.94
0.05
2.30
56.23
56.23
0.05
0.01
1.11
1.11
0.001
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
15.00
622
622
0.88
32.00
782
782
1.11
0.08
11.41
11.41
0.02
Fluorene
538
26,000
4.10
170
170
0.32
12.00
293.40
293.40
0.55
0.02
3.45
3.45
0.01
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
-
3.20
132.78
132.78
0.12
8.80
215.16
215.16
0.19
0.02
3.00
3.00
0.003
Naphthalene
385
61,700
2.70
112
112
0.29
8.80
215.16
215.16
0.56
0.02
2.70
2.70
0.01
Perylene
967
431
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
2.85
2.85
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
18.00
747
747
1.25
47.00
1149
1149
1.93
0.10
15.02
15.02
0.03
Pyrene
697
9,090
20.00
830
830
1.19
51.00
1247
1247
1.79
0.15
22.52
22.52
0.03
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
12.37
...
...
...
16.99
...
...
...
0.39
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration
in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the
maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the
PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
fj.g/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 43 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT16-30
HT16-30
HT16-30
HT16-30-SURF
HT16-30-0010
HT16-30-1020
6/8/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
1-2
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi"
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g oc
H g/g oc
ng/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
-
-
0.581
0.00581
—
—
1.78
0.0178
—
—
3.21
0.0321
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.11
18.93
18.93
0.04
4.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.60
49.84
49.84
0.11
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.10
17.21
17.21
0.039
4.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.45
77.45
77.45
0.158
6.00
337.08
337.08
0.687
7.20
224.30
224.30
0.46
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.48
82.62
82.62
0.18
2.50
140.45
140.45
0.31
1.80
56.07
56.07
0.12
Anthracene
594
1,300
1.20
206.54
206.54
0.35
13.00
730.34
730.34
1.230
11.00
342.68
342.68
0.58
Benzo[a]anthracene
841
4,153
4.60
791.74
791.74
0.94
28.00
1573.03
1573.03
1.870
19.00
591.90
591.90
0.70
Benzofalpyrene
965
3,840
5.40
929.43
929.43
0.96
29.00
1629.21
1629.21
1.688
21.00
654.21
654.21
0.68
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
3.40
585.20
585.20
0.60
15.00
842.70
842.70
0.861
11.00
342.68
342.68
0.35
Benzofelpyrene
967
4,300
3.40
585.20
585.20
0.61
17.00
955.06
955.06
0.988
12.00
373.83
373.83
0.39
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
2.90
499.14
499.14
0.46
14.00
786.52
648.00
0.59
10.00
311.53
311.53
0.28
Benzofklfluoranthene
981
1,220
3.50
602.41
602.41
0.61
18.00
1011.24
1011.24
1.031
13.00
404.98
404.98
0.41
Cl-Chrysenes
929
-
2.50
430.29
430.29
0.46
11.00
617.98
617.98
0.665
4.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
C 1-Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
-
6.50
1118.76
1118.76
1.45
48.00
2696.63
2696.63
3.502
36.00
1121.50
1121.50
1.46
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.49
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
-
0.49
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.20
0.00
0.00
0.000
4.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
C 1-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
2.90
499.14
499.14
0.74
31.00
1741.57
1741.57
2.599
23.00
716.51
716.51
1.07
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
-
1.00
172.12
172.12
0.17
4.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
-
--
2.40
413.08
413.08
—
14.00
786.52
786.52
—
9.60
299.07
299.07
—
C2-Fluorenes
686
-
0.49
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
-
0.49
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.20
0.00
0.00
0.000
4.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
-
2.00
344.23
344.23
0.46
13.00
730.34
730.34
0.979
4.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.49
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
-
0.49
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.20
0.00
0.00
0.000
4.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
--
0.49
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Naphthalenes
581
-
0.49
0.00
0.00
0.00
8.50
477.53
477.53
0.822
4.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
--
0.99
170.40
170.40
0.21
4.20
0.00
0.00
0.000
4.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
-
0.49
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
-
0.49
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.20
0.00
0.00
0.000
4.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
-
0.49
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.20
0.00
0.00
0.000
4.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
4.80
826.16
826.00
0.98
26.00
1460.67
826.00
0.979
19.00
591.90
591.90
0.70
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.86
148.02
148.02
0.132
3.50
196.63
196.63
0.18
2.70
84.11
84.11
0.075
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
6.90
1187.61
1187.61
1.68
41.00
2303.37
2303.37
3.258
29.00
903.43
903.43
1.28
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.38
65.40
65.40
0.122
5.40
303.37
303.37
0.564
5.50
171.34
171.34
0.32
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
-
2.40
413.08
413.08
0.37
10.00
561.80
561.80
0.50
8.00
249.22
249.22
0.22
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.49
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.49
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
3.80
654.04
654.04
1.10
29.00
1629.21
1629.21
2.734
33.00
1028.04
1028.04
1.72
Pyrene
697
9,090
8.70
1497.42
1497.42
2.15
68.00
3820.22
3820.22
5.481
52.00
1619.94
1619.94
2.32
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
14.89
...
...
...
31.52
...
...
...
13.14
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration
in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the
maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the
PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
fj.g/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 44 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HT16-30
HT16-30
HT16-30
Sample Name:
HT 16-30-2030
HT 16-30-2030-FD
HT16-30-3040
Sample Date:
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
2-3
2-3
3-4
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi"
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
H g/g oc
H g/g oc
ng/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
-
-
6.29
0.0629
—
—
7.46
0.0746
—
—
1.38
0.0138
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
18.00
286.17
286.17
0.64
18.000
241.29
241.29
0.54
13.00
942.03
942.03
2.11
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
13.00
206.68
206.68
0.462
11.000
147.45
147.45
0.330
18.00
1304.35
1304.35
2.9180
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
26.00
413.35
413.35
0.842
31.000
415.55
415.55
0.846
11.00
797.10
797.10
1.6234
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
3.30
52.46
52.46
0.12
4.500
60.32
60.32
0.133
0.81
58.70
58.70
0.1299
Anthracene
594
1,300
28.00
445.15
445.15
0.749
36.000
482.57
482.57
0.81
4.60
333.33
333.33
0.5612
Benzo[a]anthracene
841
4,153
30.00
476.95
476.95
0.567
41.000
549.60
549.60
0.65
5.00
362.32
362.32
0.4308
Benzofalpyrene
965
3,840
30.00
476.95
476.95
0.494
41.000
549.60
549.60
0.57
5.40
391.30
391.30
0.4055
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
16.00
254.37
254.37
0.260
20.000
268.10
268.10
0.27
2.70
195.65
195.65
0.1998
Benzofelpyrene
967
4,300
17.00
270.27
270.27
0.28
23.000
308.31
308.31
0.32
2.00
0.00
0.00
0.0000
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
15.00
238.47
238.47
0.22
20.000
268.10
268.10
0.24
2.50
181.16
181.16
0.17
Benzofklfluoranthene
981
1,220
20.00
317.97
317.97
0.32
26.000
348.53
348.53
0.36
3.60
260.87
260.87
0.2659
Cl-Chrysenes
929
-
15.00
238.47
238.47
0.26
18.00
241.29
241.29
0.260
2.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
C 1-Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
-
66.00
1049.28
1049.28
1.363
87.00
1166.22
1166.22
1.515
12.00
869.57
869.57
1.129
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
4.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.500
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
-
20.00
317.97
317.97
0.716
20.000
268.10
268.10
0.60
21.00
1521.74
1521.74
3.427
C 1-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
60.00
953.90
953.90
1.424
72.00
965.15
965.15
1.441
9.70
702.90
702.90
1.049
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
-
4.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.50
0.00
0.00
0.000
2.00
0.00
0.00
0.0000
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
-
--
18.00
286.17
286.17
—
23.00
308.31
308.31
—
2.00
0.00
0.00
—
C2-Fluorenes
686
-
4.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.500
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
-
48.00
763.12
763.12
1.496
56.00
750.67
750.67
1.472
18.00
1304.35
1304.35
2.558
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
-
24.00
381.56
381.56
0.511
27.00
361.93
361.93
0.485
2.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
4.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.00
0.00
0.00
0.0000
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
-
4.40
0.00
0.00
0.000
5.50
0.00
0.00
0.000
2.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
C3-Fluorenes
769
--
4.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.500
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.00
0.00
0.00
0.0000
C3-Naphthalenes
581
-
29.00
461.05
461.05
0.794
34.00
455.76
455.76
0.784
7.00
507.25
507.25
0.873
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
--
13.00
206.68
206.68
0.249
17.00
227.88
227.88
0.275
2.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
-
4.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.500
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.00
0.00
0.00
0.0000
C4-Naphthalenes
657
-
4.40
0.00
0.00
0.000
5.50
0.00
0.00
0.000
2.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
-
10.00
158.98
158.98
0.174
12.00
160.86
160.86
0.176
6.30
456.52
456.52
0.500
Chrysene
844
826
29.00
461.05
461.05
0.546
40.00
536.19
536.19
0.635
5.20
376.81
376.81
0.446
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
4.00
63.59
63.59
0.06
4.700
63.00
63.00
0.06
0.63
45.65
45.65
0.0407
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
55.00
874.40
874.40
1.237
69.000
924.93
924.93
1.31
6.30
456.52
456.52
0.646
Fluorene
538
26,000
18.00
286.17
286.17
0.532
21.000
281.50
281.50
0.52
5.60
405.80
405.80
0.7543
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
-
11.00
174.88
174.88
0.16
15.000
201.07
201.07
0.18
2.00
144.93
144.93
0.1300
Naphthalene
385
61,700
16.00
254.37
254.37
0.66
16.000
214.48
214.48
0.56
56.00
4057.97
4057.97
10.54
Perylene
967
431
4.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.00
0.00
0.00
0.0000
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
85.00
1351.35
1351.35
2.267
110.000
1474.53
1474.53
2.47
15.00
1086.96
1086.96
1.824
Pyrene
697
9,090
88.00
1399.05
1399.05
2.007
120.000
1608.58
1608.58
2.31
12.00
869.57
869.57
1.248
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
18.30
...
...
...
19.26
...
...
...
28.95
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration
in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the
maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the
PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
fj.g/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 45 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT 16-31
HT 16-31
HT 16-31
HT16-31-SURF
HT16-31-0010
HT16-31-0010-FD
6/14/2016
6/12/2016
6/12/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
0-1
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi"
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g oc
H g/g oc
ng/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
-
-
3.67
0.0367
—
—
0.759
0.00759
—
—
1.03
0.0103
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
4.90
134
134
0.30
0.01
2
2
0.00
0.01
1
1
0.00
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
7.00
0
0
0.00
0.01
2
2
0.00
0.01
1
1
0.00
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
42.00
1144
1144
2.33
0.01
1
1
0.00
0.00
0
0
0.00
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
12.00
326.98
326.98
0.72
0.00
0.36
0.36
0.00
0.00
0.16
0.16
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
56.00
1526
1300
2.19
0.01
2
2
0.00
0.01
1
1
0.00
Benzo[a]anthracene
841
4,153
68.00
1853
1853
2.20
0.03
4
4
0.00
0.03
2
2
0.00
Benzofalpyrene
965
3,840
64.00
1744
1744
1.81
0.04
5
5
0.01
0.02
2
2
0.00
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
34.00
926.43
926.43
0.95
0.03
4.08
4.08
0.00
0.02
2.23
2.23
0.00
Benzofelpyrene
967
4,300
35.00
953.68
953.68
0.99
0.03
3.95
3.95
0.00
0.02
1.94
1.94
0.00
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
24.00
653.95
648.00
0.59
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Benzofklfluoranthene
981
1,220
44.00
1198.91
1198.91
1.22
0.03
3.82
3.82
0.00
0.03
2.52
2.52
0.00
Cl-Chrysenes
929
-
28.00
763
763
0.82
0.03
4
4
0.00
0.03
3
3
0.00
C 1-Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
-
140.00
3815
3815
4.95
0.07
9
9
0.01
0.06
5
5
0.01
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
15.00
408.72
408.72
0.67
0.01
1.04
1.04
0.00
0.01
0.61
0.61
0.00
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
-
7.00
0
0
0.00
0.02
3
3
0.01
0.02
1
1
0.00
C 1-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
110.00
2997
2997
4.47
0.06
8
8
0.01
0.04
4
4
0.01
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
-
14.00
381.47
381.47
0.38
0.03
4.35
4.35
0.00
0.04
3.40
3.40
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
-
--
37.00
1008
1008
—
0.05
7
7
—
0.04
4
4
—
C2-Fluorenes
686
-
7.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
2.24
2.24
0.00
0.01
0.97
0.97
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
-
69
1880
1880
3.69
0
8
8
0.01
0
4
4
0.01
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
-
32.00
872
872
1.17
0.06
8
8
0.01
0.05
4
4
0.01
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
7.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
4.61
4.61
0.00
0.03
3.01
3.01
0.00
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
-
7.00
0
0
0.00
0.03
4
4
0.00
0.03
3
3
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
--
7.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
2.64
2.64
0.00
0.01
1.26
1.26
0.00
C3-Naphthalenes
581
-
43.00
1172
1172
2.02
0.13
17
17
0.03
0.10
10
10
0.02
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
--
15.00
409
409
0.49
0.10
13
13
0.02
0.10
10
10
0.01
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
-
7.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
1.71
1.71
0.00
0.01
1.07
1.07
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
-
7.00
0
0
0.00
0.11
14
14
0.02
0.09
8
8
0.01
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
-
7.00
0
0
0.00
0.05
6
6
0.01
0.05
5
5
0.01
Chrysene
844
826
66.00
1798
826
0.98
0.05
6
6
0.01
0.04
3
3
0.00
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
5.60
152.59
152.59
0.14
0.01
0.78
0.78
0.00
0.01
0.66
0.66
0.00
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
130.00
3542
3542
5.01
0.07
9
9
0.01
0.03
3
3
0.00
Fluorene
538
26,000
40.00
1090
1090
2.03
0.01
1
1
0.00
0.00
0
0
0.00
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
-
20.00
544.96
544.96
0.49
0.02
2.11
2.11
0.00
0.02
1.55
1.55
0.00
Naphthalene
385
61,700
7.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
3.03
3.03
0.01
0.01
0.97
0.97
0.00
Perylene
967
431
7.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
1.84
1.84
0.00
0.01
1.17
1.17
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
180.00
4905
4905
8.23
0.05
6
6
0.01
0.03
3
3
0.00
Pyrene
697
9,090
230.00
6267
6267
8.99
0.09
11
11
0.02
0.06
5
5
0.01
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
57.52
...
...
...
0.24
...
...
...
0.13
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration
in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the
maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the
PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
fj.g/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 46 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HT16-31
HT16-32
HT16-32
Sample Name:
HT16-31-1030
HT16-32-SURF
HT16-32-0010
Sample Date:
6/12/2016
6/14/2016
6/12/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
1-3
0-0.5
0-1
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi"
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
H g/g oc
H g/g oc
ng/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
-
-
0.721
0.00721
—
—
3.23
0.0323
—
—
0.673
0.00673
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.01
1
1
0.00
0.05
2
2
0.00
0.02
3
3
0.01
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.01
1
1
0.00
0.24
0
0
0.00
0.03
4
4
0.01
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.01
1
1
0.00
0.23
7
7
0.01
0.06
8
8
0.02
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.00
0.54
0.54
0.00
0.12
3.72
3.72
0.01
0.01
1.41
1.41
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.01
2
2
0.00
0.55
17
17
0.03
0.05
7
7
0.01
Benzo[a]anthracene
841
4,153
0.04
6
6
0.01
1.80
56
56
0.07
0.09
13
13
0.02
Benzofalpyrene
965
3,840
0.04
5
5
0.01
1.90
59
59
0.06
0.10
14
14
0.01
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.03
4.58
4.58
0.00
1.60
49.54
49.54
0.05
0.07
10.70
10.70
0.01
Benzofelpyrene
967
4,300
0.03
4.72
4.72
0.00
1.30
40.25
40.25
0.04
0.07
9.66
9.66
0.01
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.97
30.03
30.03
0.03
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
Benzofklfluoranthene
981
1,220
0.03
4.44
4.44
0.00
1.80
55.73
55.73
0.06
0.09
12.78
12.78
0.01
Cl-Chrysenes
929
-
0.05
7
7
0.01
0.62
19
19
0.02
0.06
9
9
0.01
C 1-Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
-
0.11
15
15
0.02
2.20
68
68
0.09
0.17
25
25
0.03
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
-
0.01
2
2
0.00
0.24
0
0
0.00
0.01
0
0
0.00
C 1-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.07
10
10
0.01
0.79
24
24
0.04
0.14
21
21
0.03
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
-
0.04
4.85
4.85
0.00
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
5.50
5.50
0.01
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
-
--
0.06
9
9
—
0.91
28
28
—
0.08
12
12
—
C2-Fluorenes
686
-
0.02
2.36
2.36
0.00
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
-
0
8
8
0.02
0
0
0
0.00
0
18
18
0.03
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
-
0.08
11
11
0.01
0.24
0
0
0.00
0.08
12
12
0.02
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.04
5.27
5.27
0.00
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
4.90
4.90
0.00
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
-
0.04
5
5
0.01
0.24
0
0
0.00
0.03
5
5
0.01
C3-Fluorenes
769
--
0.02
2.91
2.91
0.00
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Naphthalenes
581
-
0.14
19
19
0.03
0.24
0
0
0.00
0.17
25
25
0.04
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
--
0.12
17
17
0.02
0.24
0
0
0.00
0.10
15
15
0.02
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
-
0.02
2.08
2.08
0.00
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
-
0.12
17
17
0.03
0.24
0
0
0.00
0.11
16
16
0.02
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
-
0.06
8
8
0.01
0.24
0
0
0.00
0.05
7
7
0.01
Chrysene
844
826
0.06
8
8
0.01
2.00
62
62
0.07
0.10
15
15
0.02
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.01
1.14
1.14
0.00
0.30
9.29
9.29
0.01
0.02
2.38
2.38
0.00
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.06
8
8
0.01
3.20
99
99
0.14
0.21
31
31
0.04
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.01
1
1
0.00
0.22
7
7
0.01
0.03
5
5
0.01
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
-
0.02
2.77
2.77
0.00
0.88
27.24
27.24
0.02
0.05
6.69
6.69
0.01
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.01
1.08
1.08
0.00
0.09
2.72
2.72
0.01
0.03
4.16
4.16
0.01
Perylene
967
431
0.01
1.94
1.94
0.00
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.04
5
5
0.01
1.60
50
50
0.08
0.18
27
27
0.04
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.09
13
13
0.02
4.10
127
127
0.18
0.29
43
43
0.06
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
0.27
...
...
...
1.03
...
...
...
0.53
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration
in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the
maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the
PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
fj.g/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 47 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT16-32
HT16-33
HT16-33
HT16-32-1030
HT16-33-SURF
HT16-33-0010
6/12/2016
6/8/2016
6/10/2016
Depth Interval (ft):
1-3
0-0.5
0-1
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi"
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g oc
H g/g oc
ng/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
-
-
0.43
0.0043
—
—
0.512
0.00512
—
—
2.26
0.0226
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.01
2
2
0.00
0.235
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.20
97.35
97.35
0.22
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.01
1
1
0.00
0.053
10.35
10.35
0.02
2.50
110.62
110.62
0.25
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.00
1
1
0.00
0.290
56.64
56.64
0.12
6.30
279
279
0.57
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.00
0.23
0.23
0.00
0.2000
39.06
39.06
0.09
1.40
62
62
0.14
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.00
1
1
0.00
0.740
144.53
144.53
0.24
9
381
381
0.64
Benzo[a]anthracene
841
4,153
0.01
2
2
0.00
3.000
585.94
585.94
0.70
18
796
796
0.95
Benzofalpyrene
965
3,840
0.00
0
0
0.00
3.400
664.06
664.06
0.69
19
841
841
0.87
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.01
1.81
1.81
0.00
2.400
468.75
468.75
0.48
11.00
487
487
0.50
Benzofelpyrene
967
4,300
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.200
429.69
429.69
0.44
11.00
487
487
0.50
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.500
292.97
292.97
0.27
9.30
412
412
0.38
Benzofklfluoranthene
981
1,220
0.00
1.09
1.09
0.00
2.600
507.81
507.81
0.52
13.00
575
575
0.59
Cl-Chrysenes
929
-
0.01
3
3
0.00
1.500
292.97
292.97
0.32
7.40
327.43
327.43
0.35
C 1-Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
-
0.03
7
7
0.01
4.80
937.50
937.50
1.22
35
1549
1549
2.01
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.00
1.02
1.02
0.00
0.235
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
-
0.01
2
2
0.00
0.235
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
C 1-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.02
6
6
0.01
1.900
371.09
371.09
0.55
26.00
1150
1150
1.72
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
-
0.02
3.49
3.49
0.00
0.680
132.81
132.81
0.13
2.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
-
--
0.03
6
6
—
2.00
390.63
390.63
—
9.90
438
438
—
C2-Fluorenes
686
-
0.01
1.72
1.72
0.00
0.235
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
-
0
7
7
0.01
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
12.00
530.97
530.97
1.04
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
-
0.03
7
7
0.01
1.20
234.38
234.38
0.31
11.00
486.73
486.73
0.65
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.02
5.12
5.12
0.00
0.235
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
-
0.02
5
5
0.00
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
--
0.01
1.88
1.88
0.00
0.235
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Naphthalenes
581
-
0.06
15
15
0.03
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
11.00
486.73
486.73
0.84
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
--
0.06
15
15
0.02
0.54
105.47
105.47
0.13
2.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
-
0.01
1.98
1.98
0.00
0.235
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
-
0.05
11
11
0.02
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
-
0.02
5
5
0.01
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.01
3
3
0.00
3.300
644.53
644.53
0.76
18
796
796
0.94
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.00
0.35
0.35
0.00
0.4900
95.70
95.70
0.09
2.40
106
106
0.09
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.01
3
3
0.00
5.600
1093.75
1093.75
1.55
33
1460
1460
2.07
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.00
1
1
0.00
0.280
54.69
54.69
0.10
5.50
243
243
0.45
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
-
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.500
292.97
292.97
0.26
7.50
332
332
0.30
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.00
1.09
1.09
0.00
0.08
16.02
16.02
0.04
1.10
48.67
48.67
0.13
Perylene
967
431
0.01
1.56
1.56
0.00
0.670
130.86
130.86
0.14
2.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.02
3
3
0.01
2.600
507.81
507.81
0.85
30
1327
1327
2.23
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.03
7
7
0.01
6.100
1191.41
1191.41
1.71
50
2212
2212
3.17
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
0.17
...
...
...
11.70
...
...
...
21.12
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration
in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the
maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the
PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
fj.g/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 48 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HT16-33
HBT15-A
HBT15-A
HT16-33-1030
HBT15-A-SURF
HBT15-A-0010
6/10/2016
10/27/2015
10/28/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
1-3
0-0.5
0-1
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi"
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g oc
H g/g oc
ng/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
-
-
0.951
0.00951
—
—
5.43
0.0543
—
—
3.69
0.0369
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.01
1.16
1.16
0.00
0.07
0
0
0.00
0.18
0
0
0.00
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.01
1.26
1.26
0.00
0.02
0
0
0.00
0.11
3
3
0.01
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.01
1.16
1.16
0.00
0.03
1
1
0.00
0.24
7
7
0.01
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.00
0.25
0.25
0.00
0.01
0.22
0.22
0.00
0.07
1.98
1.98
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.02
1.89
1.89
0.00
0.10
2
2
0.00
1.10
30
30
0.05
Benzo[a]anthracene
841
4,153
0.02
2.31
2.31
0.00
0.60
11
11
0.01
2.90
79
79
0.09
Benzofalpyrene
965
3,840
0.02
2.52
2.52
0.00
0.74
14
14
0.01
2.40
65
65
0.07
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.02
1.58
1.58
0.00
1.00
18.42
18.42
0.02
2.30
62.33
62.33
0.06
Benzofelpyrene
967
4,300
0.02
1.79
1.79
0.00
0.77
14.18
14.18
0.01
1.70
46.07
46.07
0.05
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.02
2.00
2.00
0.00
0.66
12.15
12.15
0.01
1.20
32.52
32.52
0.03
Benzofklfluoranthene
981
1,220
0.02
1.79
1.79
0.00
0.77
14.18
14.18
0.01
1.80
48.78
48.78
0.05
Cl-Chrysenes
929
-
0.02
2.31
2.31
0.00
0.23
4
4
0.00
1.20
33
33
0.04
C 1-Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
-
0.05
5
5
0.01
0.76
14
14
0.02
4.30
117
117
0.15
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.01
0.91
0.91
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.18
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
-
0.02
1.58
1.58
0.00
0.07
0
0
0.00
0.18
0
0
0.00
C 1-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.06
6.10
6.10
0.01
0.23
4
4
0.01
1.90
51
51
0.08
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
-
0.02
1.68
1.68
0.00
0.14
2.58
2.58
0.00
0.57
15.45
15.45
0.02
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
-
--
0.03
3.26
3.26
—
0.45
8
8
—
1.90
51
51
—
C2-Fluorenes
686
-
0.01
1.26
1.26
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.18
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
-
0.05
5.15
5.15
0.01
0
0
0
0.00
1
18
18
0.04
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
-
0.05
5.68
5.68
0.01
0.18
3
3
0.00
1.00
27
27
0.04
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.02
1.79
1.79
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.18
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
-
0.02
2.21
2.21
0.00
0.18
3
3
0.00
0.50
14
14
0.01
C3-Fluorenes
769
--
0.01
1.47
1.47
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.18
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Naphthalenes
581
-
0.09
9.25
9.25
0.02
0.17
3
3
0.01
0.73
20
20
0.03
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
--
0.05
5.36
5.36
0.01
0.17
3
3
0.00
0.64
17
17
0.02
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
-
0.01
0.77
0.77
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.18
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
-
0.07
7.15
7.15
0.01
0.07
0
0
0.00
0.18
0
0
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
-
0.02
2.52
2.52
0.00
0.07
0
0
0.00
0.18
0
0
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.03
2.94
2.94
0.00
0.88
16
16
0.02
2.60
70
70
0.08
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.00
0.45
0.45
0.00
0.19
3.50
3.50
0.00
0.41
11.11
11.11
0.01
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.05
5
5
0.01
1.70
31
31
0.04
5.30
144
144
0.20
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.01
1.05
1.05
0.00
0.05
1
1
0.00
0.35
9
9
0.02
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
-
0.01
1.16
1.16
0.00
0.61
11.23
11.23
0.01
1.10
29.81
29.81
0.03
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.01
0.70
0.70
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.13
3.52
3.52
0.01
Perylene
967
431
0.01
0.99
0.99
0.00
0.22
4.05
4.05
0.00
0.54
14.63
14.63
0.02
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.06
7
7
0.01
0.60
11
11
0.02
3.80
103
103
0.17
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.06
6
6
0.01
1.20
22
22
0.03
4.20
114
114
0.16
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
0.14
...
...
...
0.27
...
...
...
1.54
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration
in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the
maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the
PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
fj.g/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 49 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HBT15-A
HBT15-A
HBT15-A
Sample Name:
HBT15-A-1030
HBT15-A-3050
HBT15-A-5070
Sample Date:
10/28/2015
10/28/2015
10/28/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
1-3
3-5
5-7
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi"
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
H g/g oc
H g/g oc
ng/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
-
-
4.53
0.0453
—
—
3.3
0.033
—
—
1.8
0.018
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.80
0
0
0.00
0.12
4
4
0.01
0.06
4
4
0.01
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.49
11
11
0.02
0.10
3
3
0.01
0.08
5
5
0.01
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
2.30
51
51
0.10
0.16
5
5
0.01
0.03
1
1
0.00
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.22
4.86
4.86
0.01
0.04
1.24
1.24
0.00
0.00
0.17
0.17
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
3.50
77
77
0.13
0.24
7
7
0.01
0.05
3
3
0.00
Benzo[a]anthracene
841
4,153
7.10
157
157
0.19
0.53
16
16
0.02
0.10
5
5
0.01
Benzofalpyrene
965
3,840
6.50
143
143
0.15
0.46
14
14
0.01
0.08
4
4
0.00
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
5.50
121.41
121.41
0.12
0.37
11.21
11.21
0.01
0.09
4.83
4.83
0.00
Benzofelpyrene
967
4,300
4.20
92.72
92.72
0.10
0.35
10.61
10.61
0.01
0.06
3.50
3.50
0.00
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
3.50
77.26
77.26
0.07
0.25
7.58
7.58
0.01
0.05
2.67
2.67
0.00
Benzofklfluoranthene
981
1,220
4.50
99.34
99.34
0.10
0.34
10.30
10.30
0.01
0.07
3.61
3.61
0.00
Cl-Chrysenes
929
-
2.50
55
55
0.06
0.29
9
9
0.01
0.04
2
2
0.00
C 1-Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
-
9.30
205
205
0.27
1.00
30
30
0.04
0.13
7
7
0.01
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.12
3.64
3.64
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
-
0.80
0
0
0.00
0.15
5
5
0.01
0.10
6
6
0.01
C 1-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
4.70
104
104
0.15
0.80
24
24
0.04
0.11
6
6
0.01
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
-
0.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.19
5.76
5.76
0.01
0.04
2.39
2.39
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
-
--
4.00
88
88
—
0.50
15
15
—
0.10
5
5
—
C2-Fluorenes
686
-
0.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.16
4.85
4.85
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
-
3
60
60
0.12
1
26
26
0.05
0
16
16
0.03
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
-
2.60
57
57
0.08
0.61
18
18
0.02
0.09
5
5
0.01
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.14
4.24
4.24
0.00
0.04
2.33
2.33
0.00
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
-
0.80
0
0
0.00
0.24
7
7
0.01
0.06
3
3
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
--
0.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.17
5.15
5.15
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Naphthalenes
581
-
3.20
71
71
0.12
1.30
39
39
0.07
0.29
16
16
0.03
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
--
2.00
44
44
0.05
0.56
17
17
0.02
0.08
4
4
0.01
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
-
0.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
-
2.00
44
44
0.07
0.70
21
21
0.03
0.15
8
8
0.01
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
-
0.80
0
0
0.00
0.35
11
11
0.01
0.06
3
3
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
6.10
135
135
0.16
0.49
15
15
0.02
0.09
5
5
0.01
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
1.00
22.08
22.08
0.02
0.08
2.45
2.45
0.00
0.02
0.89
0.89
0.00
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
15.00
331
331
0.47
1.00
30
30
0.04
0.22
12
12
0.02
Fluorene
538
26,000
1.90
42
42
0.08
0.15
5
5
0.01
0.04
2
2
0.00
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
-
3.10
68.43
68.43
0.06
0.20
6.06
6.06
0.01
0.04
2.17
2.17
0.00
Naphthalene
385
61,700
1.20
26.49
26.49
0.07
0.06
1.88
1.88
0.00
0.11
6.11
6.11
0.02
Perylene
967
431
1.70
37.53
37.53
0.04
0.13
3.94
3.94
0.00
0.03
1.56
1.56
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
15.00
331
331
0.56
1.00
30
30
0.05
0.23
13
13
0.02
Pyrene
697
9,090
13.00
287
287
0.41
1.00
30
30
0.04
0.17
9
9
0.01
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
3.75
...
...
...
0.60
...
...
...
0.24
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration
in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the
maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the
PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
fj.g/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 50 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HBT15-A
HBT15-B
HBT15-B
Sample Name:
HBT15-A-7010
HBT15-B-SURF
HBT15-B-0010
Sample Date:
10/28/2015
10/27/2015
11/2/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
7-10
0-.5
0-1
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi"
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
H g/g oc
H g/g oc
ng/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
-
-
3.72
0.0372
—
—
0.776
0.00776
—
—
4.1
0.041
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.70
0
0
0.00
0.13
0
0
0.00
0.41
0
0
0.00
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.32
9
9
0.02
0.06
7
7
0.02
0.13
3
3
0.01
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.78
21
21
0.04
0.38
49
49
0.10
0.81
20
20
0.04
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.17
4.57
4.57
0.01
0.07
9.54
9.54
0.02
0.41
0.00
0.00
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
2.50
67
67
0.11
0.80
103
103
0.17
1.70
41
41
0.07
Benzo[a]anthracene
841
4,153
6.30
169
169
0.20
1.80
232
232
0.28
3.30
80
80
0.10
Benzofalpyrene
965
3,840
4.90
132
132
0.14
1.50
193
193
0.20
3.00
73
73
0.08
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
4.80
129.03
129.03
0.13
1.30
167.53
167.53
0.17
2.30
56.10
56.10
0.06
Benzofelpyrene
967
4,300
3.60
96.77
96.77
0.10
1.00
128.87
128.87
0.13
1.90
46.34
46.34
0.05
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
2.40
64.52
64.52
0.06
0.71
91.49
91.49
0.08
1.50
36.59
36.59
0.03
Benzofklfluoranthene
981
1,220
3.90
104.84
104.84
0.11
1.00
128.87
128.87
0.13
2.70
65.85
65.85
0.07
Cl-Chrysenes
929
-
2.50
67
67
0.07
0.49
63
63
0.07
0.91
22
22
0.02
C 1-Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
-
7.30
196
196
0.25
2.50
322
322
0.42
3.60
88
88
0.11
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.41
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
-
0.70
0
0
0.00
0.13
0
0
0.00
0.41
0
0
0.00
C 1-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
5.30
142
142
0.21
1.30
168
168
0.25
1.50
37
37
0.05
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
-
1.40
37.63
37.63
0.04
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.41
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
-
--
4.80
129
129
—
0.72
93
93
—
1.20
29
29
—
C2-Fluorenes
686
-
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.41
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
-
2
56
56
0.11
0
52
52
0.10
0
0
0
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
-
3.20
86
86
0.12
0.43
55
55
0.07
0.41
0
0
0.00
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.41
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
-
1.60
43
43
0.05
0.13
0
0
0.00
0.41
0
0
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
--
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.41
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Naphthalenes
581
-
2.30
62
62
0.11
0.30
39
39
0.07
0.41
0
0
0.00
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
--
2.70
73
73
0.09
0.13
0
0
0.00
0.41
0
0
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
-
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.41
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
-
1.40
38
38
0.06
0.13
0
0
0.00
0.41
0
0
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
-
1.50
40
40
0.04
0.13
0
0
0.00
0.41
0
0
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
5.40
145
145
0.17
1.50
193
193
0.23
2.90
71
71
0.08
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.93
25.00
25.00
0.02
0.20
25.77
25.77
0.02
0.45
10.98
10.98
0.01
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
13.00
349
349
0.49
3.70
477
477
0.67
7.20
176
176
0.25
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.84
23
23
0.04
0.38
49
49
0.09
0.76
19
19
0.03
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
-
2.30
61.83
61.83
0.06
0.67
86.34
86.34
0.08
1.60
39.02
39.02
0.03
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.32
8.60
8.60
0.02
0.07
9.02
9.02
0.02
0.15
3.66
3.66
0.01
Perylene
967
431
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.34
43.81
43.81
0.05
0.89
21.71
21.71
0.02
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
10.00
269
269
0.45
3.60
464
464
0.78
6.20
151
151
0.25
Pyrene
697
9,090
10.00
269
269
0.39
3.70
477
477
0.68
6.10
149
149
0.21
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
3.69
...
...
...
4.89
...
...
...
1.59
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration
in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the
maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the
PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
fj.g/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 51 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HBT15-B
HBT15-B
HBT15-B
HBT15-B-1030
HBT15-B-3055
HBT15-B-3055FD
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
1-3
3-5.5
3-5.5
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi"
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g oc
H g/g oc
ng/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
-
-
2.91
0.0291
—
—
20.3
0.203
—
—
14.9
0.149
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.21
0
0
0.00
7.00
0
0
0.00
7.00
0
0
0.00
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.13
4
4
0.01
14.00
69
69
0.15
14.00
94
94
0.21
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.35
12
12
0.02
24.00
118
118
0.24
15.00
101
101
0.21
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.21
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.00
14.78
14.78
0.03
1.90
12.75
12.75
0.03
Anthracene
594
1,300
1.00
34
34
0.06
45.00
222
222
0.37
27.00
181
181
0.31
Benzo[a]anthracene
841
4,153
2.10
72
72
0.09
47.00
232
232
0.28
28.00
188
188
0.22
Benzofalpyrene
965
3,840
1.70
58
58
0.06
53.00
261
261
0.27
33.00
221
221
0.23
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
1.90
65.29
65.29
0.07
17.00
83.74
83.74
0.09
12.00
80.54
80.54
0.08
Benzofelpyrene
967
4,300
1.20
41.24
41.24
0.04
30.00
147.78
147.78
0.15
19.00
127.52
127.52
0.13
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
1.10
37.80
37.80
0.03
24.00
118.23
118.23
0.11
15.00
100.67
100.67
0.09
Benzofklfluoranthene
981
1,220
1.30
44.67
44.67
0.05
29.00
142.86
142.86
0.15
18.00
120.81
120.81
0.12
Cl-Chrysenes
929
-
0.56
19
19
0.02
16.00
79
79
0.08
7.00
0
0
0.00
C 1-Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
-
2.20
76
76
0.10
110.00
542
542
0.70
67.00
450
450
0.58
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.21
0.00
0.00
0.00
7.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
7.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
-
0.21
0
0
0.00
7.00
0
0
0.00
7.00
0
0
0.00
C 1-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
1.20
41
41
0.06
57.00
281
281
0.42
32.00
215
215
0.32
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
-
0.21
0.00
0.00
0.00
7.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
7.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
-
--
0.97
33
33
—
26.00
128
128
—
16.00
107
107
—
C2-Fluorenes
686
-
0.21
0.00
0.00
0.00
7.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
7.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
-
1
18
18
0.03
28
138
138
0.27
17
114
114
0.22
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
-
0.45
15
15
0.02
19.00
94
94
0.13
7.00
0
0
0.00
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.21
0.00
0.00
0.00
7.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
7.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
-
0.21
0
0
0.00
7.00
0
0
0.00
7.00
0
0
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
--
0.21
0.00
0.00
0.00
7.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
7.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Naphthalenes
581
-
0.21
0
0
0.00
21.00
103
103
0.18
7.00
0
0
0.00
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
--
0.21
0
0
0.00
7.00
0
0
0.00
7.00
0
0
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
-
0.21
0.00
0.00
0.00
7.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
7.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
-
0.21
0
0
0.00
7.00
0
0
0.00
7.00
0
0
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
-
0.21
0
0
0.00
7.00
0
0
0.00
7.00
0
0
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
1.90
65
65
0.08
43.00
212
212
0.25
30.00
201
201
0.24
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.27
9.28
9.28
0.01
6.10
30.05
30.05
0.03
4.00
26.85
26.85
0.02
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
4.70
162
162
0.23
75.00
369
369
0.52
46.00
309
309
0.44
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.41
14
14
0.03
17.00
84
84
0.16
9.00
60
60
0.11
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
-
1.00
34.36
34.36
0.03
18.00
88.67
88.67
0.08
11.00
73.83
73.83
0.07
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.16
5.50
5.50
0.01
14.00
68.97
68.97
0.18
14.00
93.96
93.96
0.24
Perylene
967
431
0.47
16.15
16.15
0.02
7.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
7.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
4.30
148
148
0.25
140.00
690
690
1.16
82.00
550
550
0.92
Pyrene
697
9,090
4.20
144
144
0.21
130.00
640
640
0.92
84.00
564
564
0.81
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
1.51
...
...
...
6.76
...
...
...
5.40
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration
in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the
maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the
PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
fj.g/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 52 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HBT15-B
HBT15-C
HBT15-C
HBT15-B-5560
HBT15-C-SURF
HBT15-C-0010
11/2/2015
10/30/2015
11/2/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
5.5-6
0-0.5
0-1
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi"
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g oc
H g/g oc
ng/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
-
-
2.09
0.0209
—
—
0.45
0.0045
—
—
11
0.11
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.41
0
0
0.00
2.20
0
0
0.00
1.00
0
0
0.00
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.11
5
5
0.01
1.60
356
356
0.80
2.00
18
18
0.04
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
1.60
77
77
0.16
4.00
889
889
1.81
3.30
30
30
0.06
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.13
6.22
6.22
0.01
4.40
977.78
977.78
2.16
0.58
5.27
5.27
0.01
Anthracene
594
1,300
2.30
110
110
0.19
11.00
2444
1300
2.19
5.50
50
50
0.08
Benzo[a]anthracene
841
4,153
2.10
100
100
0.12
14.00
3111
3111
3.70
9.50
86
86
0.10
Benzofalpyrene
965
3,840
2.10
100
100
0.10
12.00
2667
2667
2.76
9.70
88
88
0.09
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.89
42.58
42.58
0.04
10.00
2222.22
2169.00
2.22
4.40
40.00
40.00
0.04
Benzofelpyrene
967
4,300
1.30
62.20
62.20
0.06
7.40
1644.44
1644.44
1.70
5.90
53.64
53.64
0.06
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.96
45.93
45.93
0.04
5.00
1111.11
648.00
0.59
4.60
41.82
41.82
0.04
Benzofklfluoranthene
981
1,220
1.20
57.42
57.42
0.06
10.00
2222.22
1220.00
1.24
6.40
58.18
58.18
0.06
Cl-Chrysenes
929
-
1.10
53
53
0.06
2.20
0
0
0.00
3.20
29
29
0.03
C 1-Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
-
4.90
234
234
0.30
12.00
2667
2667
3.46
22.00
200
200
0.26
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.41
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
-
0.41
0
0
0.00
2.20
0
0
0.00
1.00
0
0
0.00
C 1-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
3.30
158
158
0.24
7.40
1644
1644
2.45
9.80
89
89
0.13
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
-
0.41
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
-
--
1.50
72
72
—
5.00
1111
1111
—
5.80
53
53
—
C2-Fluorenes
686
-
0.41
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
-
2
105
105
0.21
2
0
0
0.00
4
33
33
0.06
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
-
1.30
62
62
0.08
2.20
0
0
0.00
3.70
34
34
0.05
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.41
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
-
0.41
0
0
0.00
2.20
0
0
0.00
1.00
0
0
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
--
0.41
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Naphthalenes
581
-
1.60
77
77
0.13
2.20
0
0
0.00
3.20
29
29
0.05
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
--
0.41
0
0
0.00
2.20
0
0
0.00
1.00
0
0
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
-
0.41
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
-
0.41
0
0
0.00
2.20
0
0
0.00
1.00
0
0
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
-
0.41
0
0
0.00
2.20
0
0
0.00
1.00
0
0
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
2.10
100
100
0.12
13.00
2889
826
0.98
8.60
78
78
0.09
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.26
12.44
12.44
0.01
1.70
377.78
377.78
0.34
0.92
8.36
8.36
0.01
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
3.60
172
172
0.24
39.00
8667
8667
12.26
16.00
145
145
0.21
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.97
46
46
0.09
5.50
1222
1222
2.27
2.40
22
22
0.04
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
-
0.71
33.97
33.97
0.03
5.80
1288.89
1288.89
1.16
3.50
31.82
31.82
0.03
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.63
30.14
30.14
0.08
3.70
822.22
822.22
2.14
0.39
3.55
3.55
0.01
Perylene
967
431
0.41
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
8.00
383
383
0.64
43.00
9556
9556
16.03
17.00
155
155
0.26
Pyrene
697
9,090
5.70
273
273
0.39
27.00
6000
6000
8.61
26.00
236
236
0.34
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
3.41
...
...
...
68.07
...
...
...
2.11
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration
in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the
maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the
PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
fj.g/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 53 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
HBT15-C
HBT15-C
HBT15-C
HBT15-C
HBT15-C-1030
HBT15-C-1030FD
HBT15-C-3040
HBT15-C-4050
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
1-3
1-3
3-4
4-5
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi"
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Hg/g oc
H g/g oc
ng/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Hg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
-
-
1.95
0.0195
—
—
1.28
0.0128
—
—
2.43
0.0243
—
—
1.32
0.0132
—
—
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (ng/kg)
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.75
38
38
0.09
0.67
52
52
0.12
1.60
66
66
0.15
1.10
83
83
0.19
2-Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.24
12
12
0.03
0.28
22
22
0.05
0.97
40
40
0.09
0.80
61
61
0.14
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
1.30
67
67
0.14
1.00
78
78
0.16
2.70
111
111
0.23
0.52
39
39
0.08
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.09
4.51
4.51
0.01
0.07
5.63
5.63
0.01
0.17
7.00
7.00
0.02
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
1.50
77
77
0.13
1.20
94
94
0.16
4.80
198
198
0.33
0.19
14
14
0.02
Benzo[a]anthracene
841
4,153
1.90
97
97
0.12
1.50
117
117
0.14
5.80
239
239
0.28
0.22
17
17
0.02
Benzofalpyrene
965
3,840
1.60
82
82
0.09
1.30
102
102
0.11
4.90
202
202
0.21
0.25
19
19
0.02
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
1.10
56.41
56.41
0.06
0.95
74.22
74.22
0.08
2.70
111.11
111.11
0.11
0.14
10.61
10.61
0.01
Benzofelpyrene
967
4,300
0.97
49.74
49.74
0.05
0.83
64.84
64.84
0.07
2.90
119.34
119.34
0.12
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
1,095
648
0.81
41.54
41.54
0.04
0.69
53.91
53.91
0.05
2.20
90.53
90.53
0.08
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
Benzofklfluoranthene
981
1,220
1.10
56.41
56.41
0.06
0.90
70.31
70.31
0.07
3.60
148.15
148.15
0.15
0.21
15.91
15.91
0.02
Cl-Chrysenes
929
-
0.90
46
46
0.05
0.61
48
48
0.05
2.20
91
91
0.10
0.19
0
0
0.00
C 1-Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
-
3.90
200
200
0.26
2.90
227
227
0.29
11.00
453
453
0.59
0.48
36
36
0.05
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.39
20.00
20.00
0.03
0.21
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Naphthalenes
444
-
0.72
37
37
0.08
0.72
56
56
0.13
1.90
78
78
0.18
1.30
98
98
0.22
C 1-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
2.60
133
133
0.20
1.80
141
141
0.21
6.90
284
284
0.42
0.19
0
0
0.00
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
-
0.47
24.10
24.10
0.02
0.21
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
-
--
1.70
87
87
—
1.10
86
86
—
3.80
156
156
—
0.19
0
0
—
C2-Fluorenes
686
-
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.21
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
-
3
144
144
0.28
2
148
148
0.29
5
202
202
0.40
1
41
41
0.08
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
-
1.40
72
72
0.10
0.81
63
63
0.08
3.00
123
123
0.17
0.19
0
0
0.00
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.21
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
-
0.43
22
22
0.02
0.21
0
0
0.00
0.65
0
0
0.00
0.19
0
0
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
--
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.21
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Naphthalenes
581
-
1.90
97
97
0.17
1.10
86
86
0.15
3.00
123
123
0.21
0.19
0
0
0.00
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
--
1.00
51
51
0.06
0.63
49
49
0.06
1.70
70
70
0.08
0.19
0
0
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
-
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.21
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
-
0.63
32
32
0.05
0.21
0
0
0.00
0.65
0
0
0.00
0.19
0
0
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
-
0.52
27
27
0.03
0.21
0
0
0.00
0.65
0
0
0.00
0.19
0
0
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
1.70
87
87
0.10
1.40
109
109
0.13
5.30
218
218
0.26
0.31
23
23
0.03
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.19
9.74
9.74
0.01
0.16
12.50
12.50
0.01
0.58
23.87
23.87
0.02
0.03
2.05
2.05
0.00
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
3.80
195
195
0.28
3.00
234
234
0.33
13.00
535
535
0.76
0.40
30
30
0.04
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.93
48
48
0.09
0.76
59
59
0.11
2.30
95
95
0.18
0.14
11
11
0.02
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
1,115
-
0.70
35.90
35.90
0.03
0.58
45.31
45.31
0.04
2.10
86.42
86.42
0.08
0.10
7.58
7.58
0.01
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.21
10.77
10.77
0.03
0.20
15.63
15.63
0.04
1.00
41.15
41.15
0.11
4.70
356.06
356.06
0.92
Perylene
967
431
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.21
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
5.60
287
287
0.48
4.50
352
352
0.59
16.00
658
658
1.10
0.50
38
38
0.06
Pyrene
697
9,090
4.20
215
215
0.31
3.60
281
281
0.40
12.00
494
494
0.71
0.47
36
36
0.05
...
ESBTU FCVi
...
...
...
3.37
...
...
...
3.76
...
...
...
6.89
...
...
...
1.66
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH concentration
in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the contribution up to the
maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D ESBTUFCV for the
PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section 6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
fj.g/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 54 of 54
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-2 ESBTUs FOR SEM/AVS METALS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HT 16-01
HT 16-02
HT 16-03
HT 16-04
HT 16-04
HT 16-05
HT 16-06
Sample Name:
HT 16-01-SURF
HT16-02-SURF
HT 16-03-SURF
HT16-04-SURF
HT16-04-SURF-FD
HT 16-05-SURF
HT16-06-SURF
Sample Date:
6/15/2016
6/7/2016
6/8/2016
6/8/2016
6/8/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
Depth Interval (feet):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
SEM/AVS Ratio
none
0.12
0.20
0.45
0.16
0.16
0.26
4.80
I SEM
(imole/g dry
1.3777
0.9351
0.3950
0.6700
0.7031
16.7070
6.4551
AVS
(imole/g dry
12
4.8
0.88
4.2
4.4
65
1.3
foe
fraction
0.0212
0.0175
0.0069
0.0108
0.0109
0.0489
0.0018
(I SEM - AVS) / foe
(imole/g dry
-501
-221
-70
-327
-339
-988
2880
NOTES:
Bolded values exceed 1 SEM/AVS ratio.
Bolded and shaded values exceed 130 junole/goc
(imole/g dry = micromole per gram dry weight basis.
AVS = Acid Volatile Sulfides.
foe = fraction organic carbon.
FD = Field Duplicate.
SEM = Simultaneously Extracted Metals.
Qualifier:
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 6
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-2 ESBTUs FOR SEM/AVS METALS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HT 16-07
HT 16-08
HT 16-09
HT16-11
HT16-12
HT16-13
Sample Name:
HT16-07-SURF
HT16-08-SURF
HT16-09-SURF
HT 16-11-SURF
HT16-12-SURF
HT 16-13-SURF
Sample Date:
6/14/2016
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
6/10/2016
6/14/2016
6/13/2016
Depth Interval (feet):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
SEM/AVS Ratio
none
3.20
--
1.30
1.60
0.20
0.96
I SEM
(imole/g dry
2.6674
0.4295
7.2610
13.6940
3.8198
4.1430
AVS
(imole/g dry
0.82
0.57 U
5.5
8.5
20
4.3
foe
fraction
0.0089
0.0036
0.0295
0.0104
0.0418
0.0154
(I SEM - AVS) / foe
(imole/g dry
20S
-39
60
4W
-387
-10
NOTES:
Bolded values exceed 1 SEM/AVS ratio.
Bolded and shaded values exceed 130 junole/goc
(imole/g dry = micromole per gram dry weight basis.
AVS = Acid Volatile Sulfides.
foe = fraction organic carbon.
FD = Field Duplicate.
SEM = Simultaneously Extracted Metals.
Qualifier:
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 2 of 6
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-2 ESBTUs FOR SEM/AVS METALS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HT16-14
HT16-15
HT16-16
HT16-17
HT16-17
HT16-18
HT16-19
Sample Name:
HT16-14-SURF
HT 16-15-SURF
HT16-16-SURF
HT16-17-SURF
HT16-17-SURF-FD
HT16-18-SURF
HT16-19-SURF
Sample Date:
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
6/10/2016
6/13/2016
6/13/2016
6/14/2016
6/13/2016
Depth Interval (feet):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
SEM/AVS Ratio
none
2.80
0.19
3.70
0.30
0.26
--
0.13
I SEM
(imole/g dry
2.0060
3.0290
0.8042
2.6668
3.1286
0.4951
3.5290
AVS
(imole/g dry
0.72
16
0.22 J
9
12
0.57 U
28
foe
fraction
0.0039
0.0458
0.0041
0.0339
0.0394
0.0016
0.0496
(I SEM - AVS) / foe
(imole/g dry
332
-283
143
-187
-225
-47
-493
NOTES:
Bolded values exceed 1 SEM/AVS ratio.
Bolded and shaded values exceed 130 junole/goc
(imole/g dry = micromole per gram dry weight basis.
AVS = Acid Volatile Sulfides.
foe = fraction organic carbon.
FD = Field Duplicate.
SEM = Simultaneously Extracted Metals.
Qualifier:
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 3 of 6
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-2 ESBTUs FOR SEM/AVS METALS, HT
62561
Location ID:
HT 16-20
HT 16-21
HT 16-21
HT 16-22
HT 16-23
HT 16-24
HT 16-25
Sample Name:
HT16-20-SURF
HT 16-21-SURF
HT 16-21-SURF-FD
HT16-22-SURF
HT 16-23-SURF
HT16-24-SURF
HT 16-25-SURF
Sample Date:
6/13/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/9/2016
6/9/2016
6/10/2016
Depth Interval (feet):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
SEM/AVS Ratio
none
1.00
0.85
0.91
0.46
2.80
--
0.17
I SEM
(imole/g dry
6.1560
3.3471
3.2779
4.0350
3.4285
0.9019
7.1061
AVS
(imole/g dry
6
3.9
3.6
8.7
1.2
0.62 U
42
foe
fraction
0.0385
0.0273
0.0225
0.0068
0.0109
0.0119
0.0377
(I SEM - AVS) / foe
(imole/g dry
4
-20
-14
-687
204
24
-926
NOTES:
Bolded values exceed 1 SEM/AVS ratio.
Bolded and shaded values exceed 130 junole/goc
(imole/g dry = micromole per gram dry weight basis.
AVS = Acid Volatile Sulfides.
foe = fraction organic carbon.
FD = Field Duplicate.
SEM = Simultaneously Extracted Metals.
Qualifier:
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 4 of 6
Site Characterization
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-2 ESBTUs FOR SEM/AVS METALS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HT 16-25
HT 16-26
HT 16-27
HT16-28
HT 16-29
HT 16-30
HT 16-31
Sample Name:
HT16-25-SURF-FD
HT16-26-SURF
HT16-27-SURF
HT16-28-SURF
HT16-29-SURF
HT16-30-SURF
HT 16-31-SURF
Sample Date:
6/10/2016
6/10/2016
6/9/2016
6/14/2016
6/14/2016
6/8/2016
6/14/2016
Depth Interval (feet):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
SEM/AVS Ratio
none
0.11
0.13
5.50
0.16
1.60
—
2.20
I SEM
(imole/g dry
6.5511
3.6581
1.5789
3.7199
1.1069
6.1960
3.7820
AVS
(imole/g dry
58
28
0.29 J
23
0.71
0.69 U
1.7
foe
fraction
0.0388
0.0397
0.0249
0.0442
0.0323
0.0058
0.0093
(I SEM - AVS) / foe
(imole/g dry
-1326
-613
52
-436
12
948
224
NOTES:
Bolded values exceed 1 SEM/AVS ratio.
Bolded and shaded values exceed 130 jimole/goc
(imole/g dry = micromole per gram dry weight basis.
AVS = Acid Volatile Sulfides.
foe = fraction organic carbon.
FD = Field Duplicate.
SEM = Simultaneously Extracted Metals.
Qualifier:
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 5 of 6
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-2 ESBTUs FOR SEM/AVS METALS, HT
62561.28
Location ID:
HT 16-32
HT16-33
HBT15-A
HBT15-B
HBT15-C
Sample Name:
HT16-32-SURF
HT16-33-SURF
HBT15-A-SURF
HBT15-B-SURF
HBT15-C-SURF
Sample Date:
6/14/2016
6/8/2016
10/27/2015
10/27/2015
10/30/2015
Depth Interval (feet):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-05
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
SEM/AVS Ratio
none
1.90
—
0.25
--
--
I SEM
(imole/g dry
1.8966
3.2121
3.1662
1.3999
1.8823
AVS
(imole/g dry
1
0.67 U
13
0.72 U
0.67 U
foe
fraction
0.0367
0.0051
0.0543
0.0078
0.0045
(I SEM - AVS) / foe
(imole/g dry
24
49ft
-181
88
269
NOTES:
Bolded values exceed 1 SEM/AVS ratio.
Bolded and shaded values exceed 130 junole/goc
(imole/g dry = micromole per gram dry weight basis.
AVS = Acid Volatile Sulfides.
foe = fraction organic carbon.
FD = Field Duplicate.
SEM = Simultaneously Extracted Metals.
Qualifier:
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 6 of 6
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 5-1 PEC-Qs, HT
EA Project No.: 62561.28
l.iii;iliuii II)
I'ii ld Siiinpk' II)
iih';iii PT.C-Q
nu-liils
PI C -Q Toliil
ITPAIIs \l)=
1/2
Pl.C-Q Tuhil
PC Us \l)=0
iiK';in PI C -Q
HT 16-01
HT16-01-0010
0.25
0.03
0.02
0.10
HT16-01
HT16-01-1030
0.19
0.01
0.00
0.07
HT 16-01
HT 16-01-SURF
0.29
0.09
0.01
0.13
HT 16-02
HT 16-02-0010
0.27
1.11
0.09
0.49
HT 16-02
HT 16-02-1020
0.28
1.01
0.23
0.51
HT 16-02
HT16-02-2030
0.21
0.13
0.00
0.12
HT 16-02
HT16-02-SURF
0.15
0.41
0.06
0.21
HT 16-03
HT16-03-0010
0.16
0.00
0.00
0.05
HT 16-03
HT16-03-1030
0.17
0.00
0.00
0.06
HT 16-03
HT 16-03-SURF
0.12
0.01
0.03
0.05
HT 16-04
HT 16-04-0010
0.18
0.00
0.00
0.06
HT 16-04
HT16-04-SURF
0.16
0.03
0.02
0.07
HT 16-04
HT16-04-SURF-FD
0.14
0.02
0.03
0.07
HT 16-05
HT16-05-0010
0.78
3.62
0.02
1.48
HT 16-05
HT16-05-1020
0.21
0.27
0.00
0.16
HT 16-05
HT16-05-1020-FD
0.61
0.80
0.00
0.47
HT 16-05
HT16-05-2040
0.20
0.12
0.00
0.11
HT 16-05
HT16-05-SURF
1.59
3.95
0.03
1.86
HT 16-06
HT16-06-0010
0.15
0.10
0.00
0.08
HT 16-06
HT16-06-1030
0.19
0.01
0.00
0.07
HT 16-06
HT16-06-SURF
0.78
5.47
0.02
2.09
HT 16-07
HT16-07-0010
0.21
119.52
0.21
39.98
HT 16-07
HT 16-07-1025
0.18
4.04
0.00
1.41
HT 16-07
HT 16-07-1025-FD
0.19
6.06
0.00
2.08
HT 16-07
HT16-07-2540
0.21
114.46
0.00
38.22
HT 16-07
HT16-07-4060
0.19
3.15
0.00
1.11
HT 16-07
HT16-07-SURF
0.29
5.98
0.42
2.23
HT 16-08
HT16-08-0010
0.17
0.03
0.00
0.07
HT 16-08
HT 16-08-1030
0.18
0.03
0.00
0.07
HT 16-08
HT 16-08-103 0-FD
0.17
0.01
0.00
0.06
HT 16-08
HT16-08-SURF
0.18
0.14
0.00
0.11
HT 16-09
HT16-09-0010
0.52
2.13
0.49
1.05
HT 16-09
HT 16-09-1030
0.20
0.02
0.01
0.08
HT 16-09
HT 16-09-103 0-FD
0.21
0.05
0.02
0.09
HT 16-09
HT16-09-SURF
0.90
4.83
0.66
2.13
HT16-10
HT16-10-0010
0.16
0.68
0.37
0.40
HT16-10
HT16-10-1030
0.19
0.01
0.12
0.10
HT16-11
HT16-11-0010
1.85
94.15
1.70
32.57
HT16-11
HT16-11-1015
1.77
141.90
0.27
47.98
HT16-11
HT16-11-1530
0.17
15.00
0.00
5.06
HT16-11
HT 16-11-SURF
1.88
3.68
61.17
22.24
HT16-12
HT16-12-0010
2.93
60.20
0.95
21.36
HT16-12
HT16-12-1020
2.26
12.35
0.04
4.88
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 4
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 5-1 PEC-Qs, HT
EA Project No.: 62561.28
l.iii;iliuii II)
l-'ii'ld S;illl|>li- II)
iih';iii PT.C-Q
nu-liils
PI C -Q Toliil
17PAI Is \l)=
1/2
Pl.C-Q Tuhil
PC Us \l)=0
iiK';in PI C -Q
HT16-12
HT16-12-2035
0.35
1.43
0.01
0.60
HT16-12
HT16-12-3550
0.21
0.04
0.00
0.08
HT16-12
HT16-12-SURF
0.33
0.30
0.64
0.42
HT16-13
HT16-13-0010
1.06
12.41
0.37
4.61
HT16-13
HT16-13-1030
3.08
11.87
0.36
5.10
HT16-13
HT16-13-1030-FD
3.83
9.18
0.37
4.46
HT16-13
HT16-13-3050
0.19
0.27
0.00
0.15
HT16-13
HT16-13-SURF
0.37
0.71
0.34
0.47
HT16-14
HT16-14-0010
0.14
5.06
0.03
1.74
HT16-14
HT16-14-1030
0.21
0.07
0.00
0.09
HT16-14
HT 16-14-SURF
0.39
1.88
0.58
0.95
HT16-15
HT16-15-0010
5.53
4.16
0.36
3.35
HT16-15
HT16-15-1030
0.19
0.03
0.00
0.07
HT16-15
HT16-15-SURF
0.48
0.33
0.65
0.49
HT16-16
HT16-16-0010
0.18
2.91
0.50
1.20
HT16-16
HT16-16-1030
2.08
3.44
4.29
3.27
HT16-16
HT16-16-1030-FD
1.06
7.86
2.78
3.90
HT16-16
HT16-16-3055
5.99
207.63
0.00
71.21
HT16-16
HT16-16-5570
0.19
0.32
0.00
0.17
HT16-16
HT16-16-SURF
0.12
0.22
0.56
0.30
HT16-17
HT16-17-0015
0.16
1.04
0.34
0.51
HT16-17
HT16-17-1530
3.67
6.76
0.01
3.48
HT16-17
HT16-17-3050
0.22
0.15
0.00
0.12
HT16-17
HT16-17-SURF
0.36
0.35
0.65
0.45
HT16-17
HT16-17-SURF-FD
0.38
0.28
0.74
0.46
HT16-18
HT16-18-SURF
0.10
0.19
0.23
0.17
HT16-18B
HT16-18B-0010
0.20
0.35
0.67
0.40
HT16-18B
HT16-18B-1030
2.97
8.79
2.62
4.80
HT16-18B
HT16-18B-3050
2.66
124.13
0.00
42.26
HT16-18B
HT16-18B-3050-FD
2.93
88.86
0.00
30.60
HT16-18B
HT16-18B-5070
0.20
0.16
0.00
0.12
HT16-18C
HT16-18C-0010
1.08
2.13
5.62
2.95
HT16-18C
HT16-18C-1025
0.96
85.54
0.16
28.89
HT16-18C
HT16-18C-2540
0.19
0.13
0.00
0.11
HT16-19
HT16-19-0010
1.82
1.44
7.40
3.55
HT16-19
HT16-19-1030
2.75
5.74
3.31
3.93
HT16-19
HT16-19-3050
4.39
23.34
0.05
9.26
HT16-19
HT16-19-5070
0.19
0.01
0.00
0.07
HT16-19
HT16-19-SURF
0.28
0.12
0.30
0.23
HT 16-20
HT16-20-0010
0.39
0.62
1.80
0.94
HT 16-20
HT 16-20-103 5
2.24
7.15
1.89
3.76
HT 16-20
HT16-20-3550
0.21
0.08
0.01
0.10
HT16-20
HT16-20-SURF
0.50
2.05
8.14
3.56
HT 16-21
HT16-21-0010
0.25
0.78
1.94
0.99
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 2 of 4
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 5-1 PEC-Qs, HT
EA Project No.: 62561.28
l.iii;iliuii II)
l-'k'l(l Siiinpk' II)
llH';ill Pl.C-Q
nu-liils
PI C -Q Toliil
17PAI Is \l)=
1/2
Pl.( -Q 1 nl:il
PC Us \l)=0
iiK';in PI C -Q
HT 16-21
HT16-21-1030
0.18
0.00
0.00
0.06
HT 16-21
HT 16-21-SURF
0.39
1.90
0.77
1.02
HT 16-21
HT 16-21 -SURF-FD
0.36
2.97
1.32
1.55
HT 16-22
HT 16-22-0010
0.18
0.00
0.01
0.06
HT 16-22
HT16-22-1030
0.18
0.00
0.00
0.06
HT 16-22
HT16-22-SURF
0.47
3.36
6.95
3.59
HT 16-23
HT 16-23-0005
1.32
274.61
1.11
92.34
HT 16-23
HT 16-23-0515
0.14
62.40
0.05
20.86
HT 16-23
HT16-23-100110-DS
0.16
67.86
0.06
22.69
HT 16-23
HT16-23-110130-DS
0.13
0.20
0.01
0.11
HT 16-23
HT16-23-150160
0.20
0.12
0.00
0.11
HT 16-23
HT16-23-1535
0.19
1.39
0.02
0.53
HT 16-23
HT16-23-90100
0.19
0.07
0.00
0.08
HT 16-23
HT 16-23-SURF
0.30
0.86
1.23
0.79
HT 16-24
HT 16-24-0010
0.17
0.01
0.00
0.06
HT 16-24
HT16-24-1030
0.20
0.01
0.00
0.07
HT 16-24
HT16-24-SURF
0.24
0.30
0.47
0.34
HT 16-25
HT16-25-0010
0.39
0.47
0.03
0.30
HT 16-25
HT16-25-1030
0.21
0.01
0.00
0.07
HT 16-25
HT16-25-SURF
0.57
0.34
0.38
0.43
HT 16-25
HT16-25-SURF-FD
0.57
0.37
0.29
0.41
HT 16-26
HT16-26-0010
0.15
0.01
0.00
0.05
HT 16-26
HT 16-26-1030
0.13
0.01
0.00
0.04
HT 16-26
HT16-26-SURF
0.34
0.14
0.24
0.24
HT 16-27
HT16-27-0010
0.79
0.90
0.96
0.88
HT 16-27
HT 16-27-1020
2.79
1.06
0.42
1.42
HT 16-27
HT 16-27-2030
0.15
0.18
0.01
0.11
HT 16-27
HT 16-27-3 040
0.14
0.06
0.01
0.07
HT 16-27
HT16-27-SURF
0.23
0.56
0.36
0.38
HT 16-28
HT16-28-0010
0.35
0.26
0.86
0.49
HT 16-28
HT 16-28-1020
0.16
0.04
0.07
0.09
HT 16-28
HT16-28-6575
0.14
0.02
0.00
0.05
HT 16-28
HT16-28-7590
3.63
4.82
0.00
2.82
HT 16-28
HT16-28-SURF
0.30
0.26
0.13
0.23
HT 16-29
HT 16-29-1020
1.45
5.12
0.07
2.22
HT 16-29
HT 16-29-203 5
1.00
12.51
0.00
4.51
HT 16-29
HT16-29-3550
0.21
0.03
0.00
0.08
HT 16-29
HT16-29-SURF
0.46
0.76
0.08
0.43
HT 16-30
HT16-30-0010
0.22
13.89
1.86
5.33
HT 16-30
HT16-30-1020
0.85
11.09
3.61
5.18
HT 16-30
HT16-30-2030
0.94
21.37
0.45
7.59
HT 16-30
HT16-30-203 0-FD
0.88
27.46
0.42
9.59
HT 16-30
HT16-30-3040
0.21
6.86
0.00
2.36
HT 16-30
HT16-30-SURF
0.29
2.21
0.56
1.02
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 3 of 4
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 5-1 PEC-Qs, HT
EA Project No.: 62561.28
l.iii;iliuii II)
l-'k'ld Siiinpk' II)
iih';iii PT.C-Q
nu-liils
PI C -Q Toliil
17PAI Is \l)=
1/2
Pl.C-Q Tuhil
PC Us \l)=0
iiK';in PI C -Q
HT 16-31
HT16-31-0010
0.21
0.02
0.02
0.08
HT 16-31
HT 16-31 -0010-FD
0.21
0.01
0.01
0.08
HT 16-31
HT16-31-1030
0.20
0.02
0.00
0.07
HT 16-31
HT 16-31-SURF
0.12
45.16
1.38
15.55
HT16-32
HT16-32-0010
0.19
0.06
0.04
0.10
HT16-32
HT16-32-1030
0.16
0.01
0.00
0.06
HT 16-32
HT 16-3 2-SURF
0.28
0.95
1.98
1.07
HT 16-33
HT16-33-0010
0.82
10.38
5.92
5.70
HT 16-33
HT16-33-1030
0.20
0.02
0.00
0.07
HT 16-33
HT 16-3 3-SURF
0.41
1.50
1.17
1.03
HBT15-A
HBT15-A-0010
0.37
1.32
0.34
0.68
HBT15-A
HBT15-A-1030
0.62
3.94
3.67
2.74
HBT15-A
HBT15-A-3050
0.32
0.28
1.38
0.66
HBT15-A
HBT15-A-5070
0.17
0.06
0.07
0.10
HBT15-A
HBT15-A-7010
0.37
3.02
0.33
1.24
HBT15-A
HBT15-A-SURF
0.45
0.40
0.31
0.39
HBT15-B
HBT15-B-0010
0.35
1.81
0.11
0.76
HBT15-B
HBT15-B-1030
0.33
1.17
0.04
0.51
HBT15-B
HBT15-B-3055
0.95
30.66
1.10
10.91
HBT15-B
HBT15 -B-3 05 5FD
2.32
19.47
0.59
7.46
HBT15-B
HBT15-B-5560
0.37
1.46
0.02
0.62
HBT15-B
HBT15-B-SURF
0.26
0.94
0.47
0.56
HBT15-C
HBT15-C-0010
0.31
5.30
0.71
2.11
HBT15-C
HBT15-C-1030
0.34
1.18
0.02
0.51
HBT15-C
HBT15-C-1030FD
0.39
0.97
0.02
0.46
HBT15-C
HBT15-C-3040
0.43
3.51
0.00
1.32
HBT15-C
HBT15-C-4050
0.26
0.41
0.00
0.22
HBT15-C
HBT 15-C-SURF
0.21
9.24
0.20
3.22
NOTES:
FD = Field Duplicate.
ND = Non Detect.
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon.
PCB = Poly chlorinated biphenyl.
PEC-Q = Probable effects concentration quotient.
Mean PEC-Q = mean PEC-Q metals + PEC-Q Total 17PAHs + PEC-Q Total PCBs/3.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 4 of 4
Site Characterization Report
-------
TABLE 6-1 Harbortown Hot Spot 1 PECs
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC 62561.28
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Area B
Location ID:
HT16-05
HT 16-06
HT 16-07
HT 16-09
HT16-10
HT16-11
HT16-12
HT16-13
HT16-14
Analyte
PEC
PAHs (jig/kg)
Total PAH 17 ND=1/2RL
22800
90110
124630
2725000
110090
15433
3235300
1372500
282900
115260
PCB Aroclors (jig/kg)
Total PCBs ND=0
676
17.5
10.8
283
447
247
41350
640
247
393
Metals (mg/kg)
Arsenic
33
10.7
6.2
12.6
18.3
8.6
83.5
225
18
9.7
Cadmium
4.98
9.8
2.5
0.82
6.6
0.33
12.3
4
61.9
1.1
Chromium
111
125
66.5
15.9
47.6
17.6
154
491
262
40.8
Copper
149
228
324
30.9
166
13.8
508
413
394
48.2
Iron
40000
18100
17900
19500
18500
18000
16900
22800
19400
19400
Lead
128
498
366
36
437
18.2
1030
1230
545
231
Mercury
1.06
2.6
0.47
0.34
0.58
0.025
0.66
4.2
2
0.3
Nickel
48.6
75.2
24.8
24.2
25.6
22.5
47.5
56.2
119
25.3
Silver
2.2
1.6
1.1
2.1
1.2
0.95
3.6
2.5
2.2
1
Zinc
459
1010
214
200
227
61.8
1060
1290
1260
102
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines,
Recommendations for Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732
2003, WDNR December 2003.
Bolded and shaded detected values > PEC screening value.
Bolded and shaded detected values > 2X PEC screening value.
Bolded and shaded detected values > 3X PEC screening value.
NOTES:
(ig/kg = micrograms per kilogram,
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram.
PAH = Poly cyclic aromatic hydrocarbon.
PCB = Poly chlorinated biphenyl.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater
Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 3
Site Characterization Report
-------
TABLE 6-1 Harbortown Hot Spot 1 PECs
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC 62561.28
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Area C
Location ID:
HT16-15
HT16-16
HT16-17
HT16-18B
HT16-18C
HT16-19
HT16-20
HT 16-21
HT 16-22
HT 16-23
HT 16-24
HT 16-25
HT 16-26
Analyte
PEC
PAHs (jig/kg)
Total PAH 17 ND=1/2RL
22800
94840
4734000
154100
2830200
1950400
532200
163100
43270
76640
6261000
6939
10668
3181
PCB Aroclors (jig/kg)
Total PCBs ND=0
676
440
2900
440
1770
3800
5000
5500
1310
4700
830
320
260
162
Metals (mg/kg)
Arsenic
33
11.3
12.3
21.7
12.2
7.5
81.3
15.2
7.5
10.2
7.4
7.5
7.9
6.5
Cadmium
4.98
4.8
129
1.2
48.9
10
35.9
19
0.87
1.8
17.5
0.85
3.4
1
Chromium
111
47.7
157
34.6
126
74.9
230
114
45.2
45.1
27
21.1
38.4
27.6
Copper
149
86.7
256
72.5
335
91.9
385
149
79.7
70.9
79.1
17.5
62.5
36.9
Iron
40000
22600
21400
19100
18800
18400
26000
16700
19200
17700
21700
22000
30500
30400
Lead
128
365
556
2040
615
422
808
472
130
149
895
26.3
159
38.6
Mercury
1.06
50.6
6.5
17.4
11.9
3.8
25.5
6.9
0.27
0.67
0.24
0.12
0.63
0.2
Nickel
48.6
32.5
125
27.8
121
58
90.5
57.6
29.1
21.8
23
26.6
36.3
32
Silver
2.2
2.5
7
2.3
4
2.2
4.7
6.3
0.86
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.3
0.89
Zinc
459
459
8710
891
759
416
1270
645
170
178
126
74.9
281
179
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines,
Recommendations for Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732
2003, WDNR December 2003.
Bolded and shaded detected values > PEC screening value.
Bolded and shaded detected values > 2X PEC screening value.
Bolded and shaded detected values > 3X PEC screening value.
NOTES:
(ig/kg = micrograms per kilogram,
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram.
PAH = Poly cyclic aromatic hydrocarbon.
PCB = Poly chlorinated biphenyl.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater
Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 2 of 3
Site Characterization Report
-------
TABLE 6-1 Harbortown Hot Spot 1 PECs
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC 62561.28
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Location ID:
Area C (Continued)
HT16-27
HT 16-28
HT 16-29
HT 16-30
HT 16-31
HT16-32
HBT15-A
HBT15-B
HBT15-C
Analyte
PEC
PAHs (jig/kg)
Total PAH 17 ND=1/2RL
22800
24090
109800
285300
487300
1029600
21593
89910
699100
210700
PCB Aroclors (jig/kg)
Total PCBs ND=0
676
650
580
54
2440
930
1340
2480
743
479
Metals (mg/kg)
Arsenic
33
00
00
16.6
9.2
6.1
7.9
8.7
8.3
9.5
10.2
Cadmium
4.98
1.6
34.4
25
8.1
0.73
1
4
2.2
0.55
Chromium
111
27.9
705
180
57.3
19.4
19.8
55.6
53.7
28.2
Copper
149
77.2
407
137
90.5
19.5
23.4
60.7
55.7
76.1
Iron
40000
44900
26900
49300
17900
19400
18700
25900
19400
21000
Lead
128
3180
769
581
512
13.3
52.7
268
760
204
Mercury
1.06
0.3
6.7
2.3
1.2
0.36
0.26
1.5
0.51
0.31
Nickel
48.6
25.2
108
51.9
34.9
24.5
22.6
44
27.1
30.9
Silver
2.2
1.1
4.1
0.9
1.2
1.5
0.98
1
1.1
1
Zinc
459
186
1250
435
543
47.3
130
343
434
189
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines,
Recommendations for Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732
2003, WDNR December 2003.
Bolded and shaded detected values > PEC screening value.
Bolded and shaded detected values > 2X PEC screening value.
Bolded and shaded detected values > 3X PEC screening value.
NOTES:
(ig/kg = micrograms per kilogram,
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram.
PAH = Poly cyclic aromatic hydrocarbon.
PCB = Poly chlorinated biphenyl.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater
Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 3 of 3
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 6-2 Riverbend Hot Spot 1 and Harbortown Hot Spot 2 PECs
62561.28
Riverbend Hot Spot 1
Harbortown Hot Spot 2
Location ID:
RB15-01
RB15-02
RB15-03
HT16-33
HT16-02
Analyte
PEC
PAHs (ng/kg)
Total PAH17ND=1/2RL
22800
40690
743600
262500
236600
25400
PCB Aroclors (ng/kg)
Total PCBs ND=0
676
9940
2560
390
4000
157
Metals (mg/kg)
Arsenic
33
9.9
10
20.6
6.9
6.4
Cadmium
4.98
6.6
9.6
56.3
2.1
1.2
Chromium
111
145
88.9
289
43.6
20.8
Copper
149
165
312
435
106
33.7
Iron
40000
26500
19000
27400
2000
17200
Lead
128
387
675
967
350
64.3
Mercury
1.06
1.5
2.8
7.1
1.5
0.27
Nickel
48.6
89.5
59.8
127
23.1
24.9
Silver
2.2
6.2
4.7
11.2
2.4
1.9
Zinc
459
700
749
1440
288
114
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003.
* PEC values based on Guidelines for the Protection and Management of Aquatic Sediments in Ontario (Persaud et al. 1993).
Bolded and shaded detected values > PEC screening value.
Bolded and shaded detected values > 2X PEC screening value.
Bolded and shaded detected values > 3X PEC screening value.
NOTES:
p.g/kg = micrograms per kilogram,
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram.
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon.
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl.
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000).
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 1
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 6-3 Harbortown Hot Spot 1 PAH ESBTUs
62561.28
Area B
HT16-05
HT 16-06
HT 16-07
HT 16-09
HT16-10
HT16-11
HT16-12
HT16-13
HT16-14
Analyte
PAH ESBTUs
7.88
95.46
260.10
8.72
6.98
137.91
46.50
13.10
32.10
Area C
HT16-15
HT16-16
HT16-17
HT16-18B
HT16-18C
HT16-19
HT 16-20
HT 16-21
HT 16-22
HT 16-23
HT 16-24
Analyte
PAH ESBTUs
8.53
124.28
15.12
99.19
89.47
16.13
9.00
4.76
19.64
506.95
1.15
Area C (Continued)
HT 16-25
HT 16-26
HT 16-27
HT16-28
HT 16-29
HT 16-30
HT 16-31
HT 16-32
HBT15-A
HBT15-B
HBT15-C
Analyte
PAH ESBTUs
0.80
0.18
2.69
3.56
16.99
31.52
57.52
1.03
3.75
6.76
68.07
Bolded and shaded values 1< ESBTU < 7.5.
Bolded and shaded values 7.5 < ESBTU < 10.
Bolded and shaded values > 10 ESBTU.
NOTES:
ESBTU = Equilibrium Partitioning Sediment Benchmark Toxic Unit
PAH = Poly cyclic aromatic hydrocarbon.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 1
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 6-4 Riverbend Hot Spot 1 and HT Hot Spot 2 PAH ESBTUs
62561.28
Riverbend Hot Spot 1
Harbortown Hot Spot 2
RBI 5-01
RB15-02
RBI 5-03
HT16-33
HT16-02
Analyte
PAH ESBTUs
1.93
1.83
Bolded and shaded values 1< ESBTU < 7.5.
ISnldcd and -IlhIiiI miIiic- ".5 |->I5II - III.
NOILS:
ESBTU = Equilibrium Partitioning Sediment Benchmark Toxic Unit
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon.
RB = Riverbend
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 1
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 6-5 Harbortown Hot Spot 1 PEC-Qs
62561.28
Area B
HT 16-05
HT 16-06
HT 16-07
HT 16-09
HT16-10
HT16-11
HT16-12
HT16-13
HT16-14
Analyte
PEC-Qs
1.86
2.09
39.98
2.13
0.40
47.98
21.36
5.10
32.10
Area C
HT16-15
HT16-16
HT16-17
HT16-18B
HT16-18C
HT16-19
HT 16-20
HT 16-21
HT 16-22
HT 16-23
HT 16-24
Analyte
PEC-Qs
3.35
71.21
3.48
42.26
28.89
9.26
3.76
1.55
3.59
92.34
0.34
Area C (Continued)
HT 16-25
HT 16-26
HT 16-27
HT16-28
HT 16-29
HT16-30
HT 16-31
HT 16-32
HBT15-A
HBT15-B
HBT15-C
Analyte
PEC-Qs
0.43
0.24
1.42
2.82
4.51
9.59
15.55
1.07
2.74
10.91
3.22
Bolded and shaded values 0.5 < PECQ < 1.
Bolded and shaded values 1 < PECQ < 5.
Bolded and shaded values > 5 PECQ.
NOTES:
HT = Harbortown
PAH = Poly cyclic aromatic hydrocarbon.
PEC-Q = Probable effects concentration quotient.
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 1
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 6-6 Riverbend Hot Spot 1 and HT Hot Spot 2 PEC-Qs
62561.28
Riverbend Hot Spot 1
Harbortown Hot Spot 2
RB15-01
RBI 5-02 RB15-03
HT16-33
HT 16-02
Analyte
PEC-Qs
5.97
12.58 4.75
5.70
0.51
Bolded and shaded values 0.5 < PECQ < 1.
Bolded and shaded values 1 < PECQ < 5.
Bolded and shaded values > 5 PECQ.
NOTES:
HT = Harbortown
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon.
PEC-Q = Probable effects concentration quotient.
RB = Riverbend
Harbortown Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 1
Site Characterization Report
-------
Appendix A
Field Logbooks and Data Collection Forms
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
Al. Field Team Lead Logbook
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
2
°Ca 2=5——-— —
Project / Client
_L—
-4——
mKoyU. £ J^u
i u A JD
—-j—¦
Wl ,"
^ - '3oi3^~10 /
o,o-^
^ 5t
-------
Location
Project I Client
^0\ jx&Cafr—
1 _ N^W _. L
O^CO YY^e^ —
Y : 3^5113, 5i;vp _. (IK* O ¦ 0^—
x- Si ^ -° •u
tr 5Mk 2u?^ i— ^
I
k>fv.^ p* ¦
O'^TD vVJOv^vU A
__Tx^ (HPb— - - L 4-4^5 4 -
^ jfTz^ltr?, ,
Location V^V-W-^^V- '^0
Project / Client -SVft -T-S—
. Scale
/Cl3j?~L*'*- -£*iC /uc±^~
-------
Location.
Project / Client
Project / Client
Location
^3M4
wgro
fftl ~f
-------
Location,
Project / Client
Date
tv>ka? s^'AY iuv**^ -ys-frt
U p
O"^oo m- p. DHpsitwu
WVJ2M bary <£_ lAojAtfym^^
"s>a\V __&u ^
'biT 1P?n\vC C Bd^WwsS^iq u^(06^f
ty\- (n£U/t$S 4 j-~fao/VYp^O/\
"|VeO^
-dtk\-
- ms
Location. foATtotZ.TQl'U^
Project / Client -6VA- QS
. Scale
jCttii'/tu-LrT-,
-------
Location. Date
Project/Client
—
1 1
1
(W - f
^ l/U/l
. - >-
SUnV)^
^ -
-
J—
m.
Du^Vx^n
o
tfVy.
f-vVvwM^
s
'
J -'
iv\<")/v\ nhA
ri
mM £
2>to
"prOG^
ftSo
'
KY\oK)
»
.
^-^AYYY©/V4-
fVN- l\MVwmo c
\X><^C
* [i£)^G
rfOttD
i
VJ \
1
¦y\Xn{ \\VV
^ -
i
J
r
-------
Location
Project / Client
Date Ujri]l ^
14fctds$W-
C$0O-
_ rn.i5
-4 m
- GcUa^S
4 i
l*>rrv\on
g, fltcqM •¥>
i
Wi :
L
^ k25
go£5 "to mi2^
iV lofa+i^1^
dnM
jgfr ClM^ 4p ^H.
. Scale
£Ae/Wn
h* .H^\^g,TOU^o
H)|)t /1 .'Hunt ^pA
-------
A2. Core Processing Logbook
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
Location
Project / Client
(P-Z-Ki PD
Date
h L" 'T.&'Jo
7i/ULjty 1%°f\
o°i:a>
ID. So
P^t ik up fvfc
&&Z*. ' \ 1 +—
. t_- _n ... • r
J|*^V Uj-c 'H~
<2^ ¦ -- I— -- [-
IZ1 ^y ¦ CL^jla^a. >
I t-^'H-. <^r6^gb<3-
uS^ej^L ^ ^l^L:
<^VUjgJk ^ cdi_~c^sfy
(^3 6wcVi^ -S^ujr? Vy _
+-
1 k^K
<^-5 jE>U~ -
/,' 'If Pro/) o^&x E&i jAij
i ^ &CU35
-------
Location
Prolocl / Client (s-L ^?0
Date.
is " (& * 7M
IS ?o
!?3o
^ I — ^v-srfA - ^^Cb^T>\
b^c(k. 0yyt^i^kx-. Crtftz^
6^4 ^ £D £w juy
1 Date <*'•'
Project / Client &L&£°
Location 4^^ Date J* J~ ^Ib
. Scale
-------
Location .
Project / Client
Or LH
MOO
JSJS.
15 / 5
TZW
1^-50
%1S
Jh- \?*K tl<. ^ J
4^ c*wvt-c
%?UcL ^ ^
bswck \jLeJri W« CsC^y ^ \- $/l&r -
4> (P^*c U^? C*r<^$~
Uj /z>
IpA^ ^ cv^Ul/
6~-n<. Sa ^
<^y
Location
ion
Date
Project / Client _
£-LAjPg
. Scafe
k
1
*
u
•tf -
A
/
77
7
dJ
\i
y
<
i/<*
i-'
7
7
A
t
)-
Y
/
*
v
¦4^
->
1
A
1
t-
J A
£
m
f
<*
1
f
J
^ P
¦^V
j
>nt
J
?/
?1
<
1
f
T
- y
z
•
t
4
-
S
£<£4.
*w
VI
\"
r^>
r.»
,p
S-HH
h
0
L
r
V
"^N
Vj
kV
C
1
r T\
J
r
/
"
A.
,
*r
*
K<
r
n
t—
V
*
s^,
>
•
1
1
V
n
//
7
s
<
-I
L
r*>
*s
/*
¦y,
fjt,
h?
I
»*
Sn
1
p
1-^
/c
»
<-
1
t
1
'
i
/
A I
v
r
i.
1
u
<\
f
*
r
<
-2
r
J
\
13
-i.
£
\,
, 4
7
1
(¦
n
*
^•K
r
\
f rV
\
r
(-
)/
?
0
f
1 •
-/>
C
h.
/t
^ 1
/7
S
i
fz
k
/
A
V
<
1
¦
k-
V
0
]<
&
u
J
/-
*
»oLy
\y^r
*
"
-.
=1
Q
*
i
t ,s
rr
\
~p
y
\(
1
/^LS£ .^u'/ur*'—*-
-------
Location.
Date
Project / Client
I*#
aV 5 k VGA C
s
(z»s
%
low
)
j
\ * *
\
l /
''
I *'
¦ '
,
3
V
/
/ \ w
T \
_$
v.
k
v
¦ •:¦'
/
L CI^
1
Wk>.
Location
Date
«£- f - /£
Project./ Client.
£r LAJ ft?
. Scale
T
/LfVv ? s^-i-vy
—I : g
ML- iT
j$ j
-^gurfc/1 f2*^
'*riC'
' A *">
<=£v I
r s i -A
l&t£ag )
-A?, f
»¦ -*v- I £ -8 -i6 ^ re
-M^-gg :
i/y
p T* I Up Jis e?
nSE X
* rt
*.-14 ©l
-------
Location. W Uv3^V Date C ^
Project / Client
i P OKJL^&fiy CjZc^— ^JyO<
\ZU
tV ]&-<>%
MrT[b-Ol-lClrO
i^ctiTZ, I V }c^>
VvgJ? -
- 6 AtjSj
IP© cw~ ^0
*
| <4, ,CK> L-M.vctn
Location |A^ V^nT Date (n"Ct"
Project / Client _
6" L NP1^
Scale
-------
12
Location
Project / Client
Date
\&L/$
p^brM t/vw
L~v"-5
|1 3(?
Jc\p^ u ^~f(p
Project/ Client
&Ln Po
. Scale
-------
Location,
L?" l£> (£>
Project I Client. QLM to
Location
Project I Client.
Date
QiO-^
15
. Scale
m
j 1> |g^ <-c ^c.
frrtrcaji Vtri£>
W-M
Si^ j
- Z "V"
4-+
¥&£
KTn-
c&
Lk'
to
It* T?
r
t *4:i&
\T
-2?
I V
\a
)
>LjC
"it r
l >r$d-Z'
±tt
s
.TTtjTr
?D £o
+}t fa - ? 7 - 30*40
/ fc S^-
MT/6--Z3
fJt{^ 16 On V
I . ,J * . X .
\H c^e.
#
/£l&
-------
16
Location
\yj/ jfeurw
Date
Project/Client Q-LJJ
W-Cro ff-r0*tTS
) *t£rz-
gUu^.y/G^
17. «3
)?;ts
ttTfe -ITr 6$>S
I >r ^ I ^ IC&Zr
\T'&
\T.to
«T (,
C- 2?-
- /S25
~
7 K ?C7-
>
1 X15& / I XU-n-
Ht/6-?J~ 1®U0-DS
f A" I ^
(My&u. t-^eA S tcvfi-
^rl6-Z^\[d \'^p-t>3
I* trL jr l*ctCK
^ U~£f-
(kh-w)
\?'?°. ^TlC-27- ISfit&o
-=t il T zfzzp^
Location Date ^
Project /.Client C-rCJOPV
L Scale
-------
Location _
irill/4
Project / Client.
^ T t& -24- f- ~ &10-&
3 &jk iriss^ z.v^
rtlfio-'ZS'^xV c^bHO-lb @ T-Z°
IX B(%rt ICaP^y
Ht U, -25"
OA. fc~«W&
I ocalion
Date
G'(lyl&
Project / Client Gr L^
-------
(i(( 20
Location _
Ik
Date
Project / Client , -JtU&SSL
110 HO
fe H
10 30
io:35
(rf 1~i6 ~ Z£ ¦" 65
tfr/fr-Z*- ~f>1o
Om^'„
C«rt ^ fc/nr - ;(4
OOKlictd ^
Jrvu-lk . ^ p^z^fS"
PUiitfS hU*->
II^
PoLes/yi^ fcj-r ^
ut k - t&J wio
bfT l(& ~ " [0 % 0
(X^jrgT 1*16^
ttT[£r U-/0?o- ft>
I r lx
Location.
l'ro|ect / Client.
frOMeo
Date
^ te-/&
21
. Scale
li'.Zf : :fff W ~'&_ fSoS5: ~
t> jy^-i /xfegy
A££~i«
-------
Location.
l-fciCWJ-zu'i-
Project / Client.
CzHjoJS.
I ocation.
) W &<*>¦'- n„e (, -U. it
I'loiocM Client
fi-L/j ?o
Scale
f 23
-------
Location /^Ztf Date
24
Location 1
Project / Client _
C-rLV vy
1 r
O, ir fa
p.;5 PTf^L^vr^j H-t 14.- ^5
jar:# f+r/£ - z £ - ^/o
pf>a H-r/fe-£V^>? o
I g^t i-X^cJZ-
kffiI IS . cie**- ' |. |—
E?
i ocation.
"tkrW_^^
Date
trt/A
25
t'reject / Client _ r-^L P
-------
26
Location.
Project / Client
AtL m P q
Date
WR ESZteE
it/¦ jj JH^r Mr/6 j?f
A,o£tvSy^ 6p-
Jf?? jUr k-^Ugzo|
iV^STSr t }\1&&Z
/
|5'> Jhfer^a??*
|v (>/ 4^
EOS: 5S~5 (& 6~2-
%MS ! Z> ^^jKijC'V-V' ^
Scale
W *P7j 1 !*¦ | , 1 I r "i *f
kj:! iji: srv-^K^e-
si3^
-Li- i | riTp r
JH - ^
t/. if r- '
Hcj^tc
•r|uT /fo" ;
ibfr (
Z-IZ' c
h-V&-/1-S"-
2^ <£*Z , i?ci
f J—L - I UlrrJi rl^T- vi.
»
%'-ss ;
^7> Aa *' j ^'
-rt r £(» " i z <2jU
\ 4 fj ^ ¥*1% jr '
:.\±i- ttT/6 &-Sui
^ I
h— rK5 <
/>c ttfZ.-
< S'iZ
\£j v| —?
0 <§
—I—1—1—
- H • - { —j •
1—-> 1 -f -
/ ^f~r/£- "2d — ^
\
\ 4zFT IL /^r— X
uc
(¦&li:
to
K /fo jf * /6
rj-j-p r- W' /fef 7T j Q
££*T/£>- /5~ 5
#r /4rWp
v>va*^ r <3
fife
J* py« f v:
lpjt>
*>lZur
[X zo
jC ' /^s
frjib-cft
¦tfr)krO% -<¦
- t — ^cf.
. I • ! ! i it
W> (^)
>w£- 0
1*3.-
/^ gf
£Stf /£aX*v_~
-------
Location.
>-v
Date
Project / Client _ CzOtofb
© <&
^>c-c^y. U^ufW
Location
L-NU
Project / Client.
£- I Ai pa
. Scale
-------
r.
Location.
Project / Client
Date
k-H-lL
fol Mc>
C57 AS
LO-.fr
\W
16'. I '.>
ft O&'Q (S&~. )
A fi- r MCLt *y '-
Wm to-
Ikt&Zr r L
- ir [& $0
~
ts, V—A- ^
10' is H / 16~ IS
WHO
ttr/6-lf
(xrl ot
i
doio
I \ )(e-crz.
io-i'5
(4i it' [?- \olb
j \c %(&- J | V /4 6"2r
Location _ db-»-v*
Date _hdRilL 31
Project / Client. C-rLtOft)
Scale
-------
I
32
Location.
Date
k-M-U
Project / Client
r-rLnPo
ii-io yci6- or-
C
T '
)\.?5
IT-V
^rdL^s\i~r
Mr ^
'3°
t-y
t^Cjf
14 tIC - M -
30
-S-o 7^
p
lQ'40
L^-0
¥4.10
11
P(2^e^Sfhr
r J>
H-ty
uoiz>
\kt^/
VfTU-
l\^ (
v
[ *f - 5
fO K
4
v v ?
I k 1° lr {
I
r
Location oaie (g 1^4, L b
Project / Client _ fU, M P
. Scale
-------
34|^n
Date .
jo fy'LQ
Project / Client
C-rUJ1%
U?(3 \.%~)5
I'flZS
VfTtt -7)-^ ® /jr
yrlC^'s^S r?:aS
yk v&*c \j2>U
-------
36 Location Date I &
Project / Client
q > ? 4\-r IQ, - n - &Zx> - Ms£>
1> <£ ark
IT-V frrlfc-
9 ?/
1 k 8*2^ 14
A
frrkj- (i- fZ56
l y^hr j I 2f tyjr&Z—
*15 ft) ^ijeupk .
/j *i o Srfe :
/ V? *T~ _ IxUo
n:\z mU- oic ~ \6zs
l*m-/ i KU>^
unit? ftrttU» - loz^~-
lb ' . I £
toJS t\T k'Ol- Z^lO
7
\b\lO
-------
Location _
Date I0~/5V'£
Project / Client £tLK)-£0 :
C ™ C&LO
i?v. l>< l£>&f
I ocation.
Project / Client.
Date.
39
. Scale
r*^93
-&Tf6r)
wntfc^tS c
I
- xo
8R
IS
IW
13'^
htrJk-rUt c
t
CJL&>-
®5f9
Mr
t>L figA
I *'-30
5"
35
Afr/6
&3
'Y
Ht/6
¦St
Ol
Wr%°^
!sS%*>
k / ^
.1^
CO--
X
%-
oolQ
M
{-Kit O-gL
-
13
~r—I—
,. 1- --
fe
T
3f
XV
U^A>TF Z.
|S-$?
a
m
'V
CKt-P)
ti
/ctuZjTin. £A*
-------
40
Location.
Date
Project / Client
^rLN^O
\L:7P
\C.oS
toA*T£ •?
CrciJO
I
Z*
- Z'^r
j
ifr.io
4+t ^
i- 6(o
- e>oic> _
1
) VS 0^
_ Ix
U or-
\U,L
, Zx
%££
/
K:2f
U>A
bX& < CTcifj
Z v Cf£- —y
5—^T
location Qate &~~l£>~(b
Project / Client O 6.AJrP^
Scale
-------
J / AjjT Date r ^ ^
Pk>i>>< I / Client
:ts
1 <\)Lb-z
Wd
I oration. Date/^-Zg'/-^
I 'ro|ect / Client
1A
j t-Ar\
es^*-
\/
_s
*
vTF
f
u<
*
Vx ?
«
-A
f
r
'h
nci
'
P
~
/M
yJ
•f. /
. /
y>,
Je
U
0
&
\
/ d
D.
¦ A
«i <0,
K
L
' >
<4-
6r^
o<
~&6
z-SS?^
\
0<*
"c
\
y
J
d-U
Loe^fji
C
10
>
¦S»V-
Pc
_J
i"5(
*%.
>v'
fa
Si'vi
56
<
j*
k<
ic-\
/}
c ^
/ *
a
\i"Vi
/ /
£c>N
1
' [pt^bz
"
\
-|
10
7*
<
?£*
*v rr
5"
\
<3
lo
• V.
)
P^ce
-SS
*.c
r3=
5 *M
pk
/
0-
z
7-
Yc
)
r
X £
of
:
7v
Vol
7-
lM
L
rJ
c
L
V
J
\
/
-o-od <-
k
—tVi j££e.
-------
Location i- Uj'uCr- I SMtJ
i»ro|ot I / ninni
dX Date Jfflkfek.
:zf
11'-%o
W
it ho
iM?
00 10
10JVL
?OJv
m»
J0\0
j* i
e^cM
/vT
l ocation Date /£>^?<2 -is 9
I 'roject / Client g^^fWnuS Cr>z£cns
??<
—
fix
:!C
"3
f
ii
V
i
vih
J\
Y
'K
d
bl<
—
7r
i
?r€
I<
tifii
v)
n
ftj
l<
>~ }
't
\\
ay2
-I*
£
i
2
n
Jo
£
'o
7
tz>
[Lu
'4h
'y
,/ /
*/
i^i
f .3
*/
D
)
Co
c
is-L
/
i
ra<
~r&*
A
Ha
t
/
/
V
$<-
<1
; I
W,
7
/
o<
X
S
& i?'
i
A
»A"f
srf
/ >
"r>
f>*s
\
f
,c
7c
/
-------
10
I ' ii .ition j \ y^T\ |£QTT IT>\Date lP|2-^)[ 1*$
project / Client CM, jffEffiioro 5"
l^OufcSian w\ 3L glUSoo • P\V^vvpP^ 4r>
ViZp -to Z% Ijntltc^lIX
vrh^fv^\j 3cVul/vu( bat
sn4~v to cdwu d^u.it°/v ^
>• a /i /-> - vj^i W cmx^pc
d o| ciJUm Ote&ieJL
"\YU to CM-V \A^vaO erf Ott—
obv\a,\5 poiKY^ of
a?ptu.CW-^ <2^X|
Location fact's-lse^.
Project / Client
-------
12
Location j)->
Project / Client
Date
lljy.
6>B4< "g&lk-cnfy-r'
l i< 2 Q-j~ \
07-
I * U- co-
(tm
:Uf/W-Jt( [Jii V&l
o-+'Su^)
°^.$0
*3Ut
i$ ~ i£> - fay-
M'l'1&\S @6
Z tx-
/
£ _
Mk^kJ lklrJo/5^
2_*%frg. 2x
tce«£
JUj^\U vdju^_lpr$ &$*$&_
£t>!5'||g -S^ct
I* ^ Z i \ Ixrft&Z
Kfti5 " <>A±
S-/5-
WlPfc
V -V~* S^S>
^\Uckf H')->j5<3_i«l;?o
/k^/
^^al1 —
Nib® >C&
-Wf rf fort-S>
/h Nfoir ®
, f>S^7
ipjy
t^kiXz-
^ vwzzr
-------
Location Date _.| I - ^
Project / Client
jTp (h ^ Js Z-hJo jzS
P&3
CfilLec
6~T --SK^
hd XL
1CI'%
& n W3"
t \J2>
Xd
Uc-J^L i
I > 2*z
/-
ZAgC^ Zr\IA f2.
^--e
ZXHh } I A Mi
&$>JZ
-63 .
5uxt-
j6- 4i-^i5
RMj
y-
I6>^5"
ir
)6 - Zo
/ / VUfZr
\ X Z-g^ , I k Ho 2y \>j S^ I k
t^X 2<
fr?~gui£ At3
*4 xHdi 11
; 51-
_if S"T K -- £*25
[Vo^
jytcTg,
/
W
X
^3*^
L^Mcr^i (yS;
.-^>4o"T/ [x4»>
jHSS
1 ^
fe&
MP>
_KJL
Location
-------
16
Location
Project / Client
Date
fZL-tUj lotuyk
J33&
11. tW
AlvL £idA
-Lk
oo\
IH. 5 A ; <$£> "3 i 2
Hid;<^7vn
-------
A3. Core Collection Logbook
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
flvf f C A-f-
7> Cj i 0 — a a-J- &- f a».A>v - !
anngf-. ^
¦M<
/
9^j> C^
JU
Jf-rip ^i*jdL±—Xv^~
/ gjoieL—-— - '
- L s>-~ ¦ &<*¦ ^c^ '?mi,
^JL AA^^LbHV
\A»$%
¦ T
Uht»A&\
y[>\
CCoSteM)
-A'XL Mksm t&£>
&>.
VM-y /i.
tff/6-OX
4c
tA
tust Zc>f */>
f*.
/ /V/W'
/n
j|00 -On iUfikiG ^ Mtl£-0±-
/L10-
^ (ltd~t^- ^
/**-
#»\»/i
£ /f, *(i>M-t'm
^^rr^T-4h-/
Location
Project / Client
3
1)A^)T &'Wa/~ Aftf, Date 0 7 ^jjyL-hPi-i
6LMm
. Scale
•tw BE
eyz-f.-i'^ <^c v\& >'
sA^- 7'rr'V /,^ p-2" (c:'^
CtSifrpf /|t. AJk^
H',%
,
,'/TA,r\
4z>
)if %» -
&.-{farr)pT- 3"fi//
r
trt ity Pfti
so ti)'-+ >* *- >-'-y
^+^^1 /n ,J/F4g=agfc^:
~~ r^'A^ *1# ¦-Si-!J- *-*£""¦.
JLmi
\)Q^
lA fajks c
tK^ ($fj4L ,4'^r 1-
ir p,4
¦i-r-h
T
'^tr-TZ^7-
'iyf /*i ^ !&.£'
S^fb
U
C h*Jf j
=2£_
5ig
-------
Location.
Date
p'oiec"c'""'
i H£
%jH fa et***-
yjfrft *- ^ +k c"" *~l"e~
*Jl %£UU J<+
" 7-W TU Ml
7.751
_ t 6.0 -P" *
-
— JS^ ^ ^ &JU
Ut.AfM h¦«£ ^
/wlty4t ^ '"
11 \ ,.wj // -/z--/U<3
J'« o-f 5 .
I bc® - " jf^ $
-^rX'-t-. v^ct-'Wy' -== SoTtTi
-pSyjrffid |^"p~ it
--£$& ($>ji bfUv) twe-^ ^
^•4j 1 (Lr'tkfiff' .
.JT-ti*-— Jy-Circ* Xc-_ vtf;(j
al (;Mivy f?lkj ttu)~irU<(JU
y?J^r^'1^ /n. (f JLef- ^t J^fc* rMfrf"
o£ ftJL.il (6-&T Ca/Ti', I'^j" I
f i^l- &A \r«*'Ofl
Location _ gf-Vpil ^Ur ML- Date *
Project Client Ji^^m/MLJdM^--
. Scale
-------
Location ±_^Jcx^l^£-kL Date
.kfiS
Luuaitui' ^ ^ 1—- * • -i — •
Project / Client —
e,\j.r.{"y ^ MteiL l^*yk ^
fl-J~30 -L JZ^A- iwS»Jg ar.y" ^t/.'gi $^wWuA&~ . J
— - -
L Cr>*\ - ^j, iQrn if If*- P^ (P^
fyh j C^A) —-
- M;Le-j Jon , _2fi23.
fit C-snA. &PA i4.itIf ^5-
& " '
03W -
ftn re-H-w'-yr jj^t
j> -Cj- CB1& kno
/ / -3«? - fa \ !*c*M tvs ^ ~HTl6'C Date f\i/ d*&l4
Project I Client. ¦f~f& f 6/i r f C.J-ri /fc-PA (rt-^J?Q
S ^KVf
. Scale
-------
ate
)2aaj2- ft 16
Location
Project / Client
H*r
L-C0jJ^- 4Lt£JM' j0TP.€''*\\^
AjL ^ k
- (?0s<\ j j 1
— t^A. CPcX^rA <1*1
I
e^-fk^y>* ^.5<^C€s5'r^f rcrr**
'n ^s"
/n -M-& /*sf *
/J \J-e~y h U M .'? IcC-aAl tr\
&,-C-Ler- -foe,
Jfl//N (flvWv'f?? -fld -f-i *tf.C4\\cQ £lct?ir) . .. . 1
- rOX
^»V/ r€¦ Atv/v w c*t
- Wn>tr s~~ yr'y reU&j<_
I ^>'A cirfy\>CS\
¦ ch*iO&f\' M~t~/6~^S\
On 16C*J itfT\ HT16 — 3H~ 3 )
£Ad />?* ctfr:Vd'y
_J.ia^o, i(Aef>*nr-'$- MTi£ ~~ _
- <7?7 /^ca-rl~\prf\ "H~Tf6j -
.^' »v gA «!>/g(- 7 \jP*
cctU{A~ cef.& zy^t •'
v<-f> - cfa?-/o*r~l~ MTIf'J-%-\_--
$tyyx>r-h ves~sel -fciU*
>
W15^/ \\X\(j- 0(7,
J\£01m<-± Ca*& ay^eLfi-oAeS^
Location
LU,ailu,, foArh^ Rj\/*f AtL— Date
Project / Client rbiajV^ /^Pft 6?^KG>
^ U/»V<^- A/
. Scale
-------
v
10
Location M. re, Date
Project / Client //,» 6 ^1x4* jir l***/£PA bLvfP
"~70 ^
A.V HTI i " 3-7 t) A tyf-o
u/t\sh ML
kytf* 5&/£C0V/>*:vf" tfT(f~rX^j
-^£^JuJ=~-j>*ir7r<
I m
I
1/1-1
/t / I V
0^_ 7,
r C- o * v r / v^c/ _ f *
1^/0 — S^du^s ih-p00— LJ\ o&rr!
1
bo/L/jjjA.
" 'V f, v UrVUJ J ' ' I \ J & I V y- —r_
CjtLu^-fLiaaiT cores
hu/h,aceL.r6m\ Sped0*r^ c(e-AjJi^
. Scale
/^cZsfXrl £fie
-------
Location ¦V/-P/-- f\0C Date \0 \TtiJJ (l0l Q
Project / Client tffmrhr-bviJrsj/gPA 6~^fJPO
{O^
lioo
~~ Coflec^~ C0r& pen*^ rAjT~
K T (6'^- \Q ^ p^siS) IC f-f- recc/ v&y^
-t ^\J)r jiyy. ^y»rf[ HTtt-blh-
t Oh litd~;tr\ aJ~ ft T{_(li2J
| CqIUa^ p oa*r~ i
flM.
£o/(&csb' f-tf for H,&- p&/\&
5 r -M T/ h
P, 'i tlA^e >«j\ loco-Men
KtiC- 1% zh'-Ph
^k>i po .*/\-/" farfkor^ fcd t
/a fffjitf far -fhp,
0r\ ltedA]6<\
Ce>((Jfjb Fa
nm-i<
of •J'hZs ^hy.
u fi
fibO-
nw-
<*/vC cord I ^w^/'gr.
T (- ti/^s [d (f- J
piK$k ujM\ ^ £j ftCevt^ r UijJw.
OkrJ&tA QptoT d± W_il_>()(eLl f)/" { f TZ-
Location . &V?r Date (0 enw^pji
Project / Client fftvrbnfvMfs / (s
-------
'4
Location.
fieJ-m K < so,-rAoL- Date "Wlfi
Project / Client /£?A ¦ vie" a M
O^H 5 — 0/\ 5/ Ag
laxd. ifyu>;p
^./T^LC
OSt S S/>ccrfj uj), Qt-fkLr^ rflAni'lr' PoLet—
f'{a.^rliorb-r
/H' U& O^A
fH'kt u'-vX :Johv\ Cle fltAjl)
01(0
J—Aa
#A /tfyvj.V A>b
^ El (0*10
ktlt'h
ass. pcvsiKr gjj* ftTfi- |j|
•f*^L ny/M5£ <&r joqa^. j \
fo -4^ Lffjt.sk, recdvt^CWAA
tftH ^ ~ ^>^-C UyO. HT{(?
04$O \ On !pcA«i 3
I OX)
(c ]kc\ COrt jO^.d-r M fiTlj) -J|j
t#<£ \ju (0 -fr pJkJ, I r&cef*m
Xli' ' j_ ~
^pu,J\s> ufl, flp.p/,Aj H 'fI i~ JM
^ '¦' t~ fruX-Jriy L-(^g.ri- j/n *L ^
-------
16
Location )fc^ i<*-i >e.\
l^cc^Alo^ sA'l
J- uriHft
Ho A± ^ 5 ^
/o 4»Xo>d~ f \Pf*& p/
j- ygi | Ct(bc3r cere l
jO-fAr push . iO-f-f f &:.cwy
02^ ~Mj>. X!a <*A\8w/)4, Ab
i
9<^yo/e ^ iUsAeJ- *Jr $ ^
iv^ik *Kd, i£»^ Kt>r lA,&U^ -&pX^?-
IdL.fjt buJr no sed*
'y/taJti Pzjxr^ MTU-
m $*> *~~ (tri (oteiul iv^ J&t H^U" 0°l
~ Co I feed* P iA(%r wcL COS e^r'
/# p-^5 k I !o -ft- Vutvsyft'.
( J $cM? — (JUKI 'S u-p. H*T(l
A L }$Hj
LyL
¦&/i)*.r'
km
dz
location M re .'¦4- fc«r /W^ Date \3JlMAoiI
Hfujnct / Client
L» ^ f.(otjLchy
Scale
-------
18
Location.
()oX-sf*-\~ forty Aoc Date 0 i
Project / Client \\ Ay (acr f/>.»rs /B-P f\ -
Q«th**± -
Q70Q
i £?^o:
| 07
£A
On-i
JtL
(i^r l9t4ro, J" LdliC^
+± HTM -m
qjMlAL +k
(f^opto^A^ iyp J
j/f l\(A^ _ i_ ) T I /
6rej7p^ fa, ^k.j 4**yor+4 iff lo^rA
(^0 j*' \A*<) jjk '(< CjySciiJ'^
<£*& -io a^_ 0::-r *fy, I CoAccJ-^
"T~
19 1
Date
iffiTft/J ,m<6 1
l ocatiofl rffi'j' $*t V^~y—^\ —r-
Project I Client & FA ftPd—-
£~? ''F GM^f.i^ b$h S-nyA
Scale
-------
20
Location.
Date
Project / Client
7 3 eF ^ m~hw
npe
}0-ft- f?ujh, 5.7 ^
/f;4e L&a.d-'X* Kaavx
$AhJ?/&l 'h slec-t
bvy \Jo k D
Sj-bkIs kp, MT16 -06
I HI 5^ 0/i hV«A\a j^-f Nrt6'Q5. 4/'k3
a a
Co
J3>tf ft- r ec * /
Sk*i\
i m
A/-A()~ A iy?l/0( c^\f$(yr\ ^Jg/~ /\ Q fa A- -(rth^
_l iWX ! pm^r at t €sQ— H-Cl .
fi:-f4- i^ppf/)^
Um T \ T
<^g, flPspt/r"h \j4 T16~ o5~
(AaIj^A epuJfomkI- y^yi 5tfvwvto(
±5
ISJ-V
) boo
t bW
iU - pT^-jy. - . t
^>^"' tft&J-ifO.H- Y> i1 /'! jla /6jrrf\o ¦j'JJ
0^p\r\" [idif font*.
-------
Location.
DaK ^
T n—
s
*7]TppI
n\;
{
-------
Rw&T An Date.
Project / Client _fc Wrkfr.cL /^TA (rU^fO.
fl:\ar Ace-- DatelUUlMil
Project / Client ^ _ -
-------
10 I r*, ifif\n [jpJr,^ k:^r AOL Dat
Project / Client # /v-ir h(rL-f^fV
?v~
Iqx. o + 5 ^
ifk-yf M HPp-t- L—
) O — kdctvtf^y Z-f f" vf\ s
5 V .
ih-
*y?/. <*-
J SrCar6?-
a hA V»3// /g '
£/4 s J a. Heot.
4~0 tLiSCMjtS if-&{&&- W0-J\r\rA^- fct.-r-tkes
ft~ ^J^Jr-iraJr!/A
m-J feari"
n
7^"?$ 4" Mm&cA, -/-A -6
?5*r
tslIedeA. <*-+
ike€ s:/«''A
P^r, A"**y^ ^0 /'it!
-------
12 Location fr()C> Date
Project / Client
pr.'rLx^-
Location
Project / Client
. 13
Date (<-j[5/(/^
\/*M 55 E 3-"5mpW
°^3o.i &\ oaVvK <
cU- hM-
Q VVVrar^ccr
J(W IcvjtU
5^
Q&X>
>av^1 b<^ cWiw
kWiJvJ j—T : r
-4*1
i i -i rT-
Otyo fljtii
a>i7o ce-WN~: t^iucWl
T "¦ -iU^FFl) ' ' 1
siw\ d3^iV#.
OirT fttKmjt *H tj^
i«P j *( ccmpWK
-------
A4. Field Data Collection Forms
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
Bft
F.J
un-sri.ncfc Li"j
iotffr.tv.r CoU^cttr«r« i ^
•iffifi: ! "-rhr^Vy^- 'f-r Fctr
Client Name and Project Name
GLAES
HT16-/1 I
N,.-M:: ~M:jn h*
b Pnjfjc: l .urilj-'i
CORE COLLECTION INFO
Drilling -Subcorirarto 'Equpm- iJ up-Mlr?
4-h.dt. No hit fi'o mi
Opera"or llama iUr^nst # If ^cai/SLii'
ongmm^miingfrn
! , -» , f
r.ifnplinn Qauif*ni^nt u\ >; Vtethn K'".,3V ~ClurCi- UPc i
Rotosonic __ _ -t? barrel _ -'n diamcte1
in diameter Manual PushiVtoracore
ft Bo^onar|/an Veen/Other
Uo re
Grab Sdrnpk
Other
-ft barre-i
-t >
Start Datc/Timi*
Stop OatelTmio
Lt 7>ed S5i«^Vs>h;ji'
ft
)C «-0nid.r¦ .jt«.' _*yst>-r
H i1 ' i > >
V ,1 ' '
11 ivplj -^vVnipr ni't^r'^ndi
l.i '"Vf tJt'h mTchp » m ^ . . .n.-ihirM . ivinvl ^|r..Cl cn i
tb'wO "»Jy ^'Vi 1 i
1 onnn 1 '~.pfh !fi>
' «. ^
- rov'i vr
'1 ' , Rt-ovt-1 y
"
-fl X I
fJampit (,ollti:uor M'-1 hod
Description of Materials
g £+¦ Hi-tit & 4ke, iAf.li kfl-l,
uscs
Code
'rrtervit
it'* f'11
Major Sedimem We, color, presence of SAWrocWwood, QMshera, oner inclusions
Sample ID
tfrtLVy <;}4- M/.-'fA *- *-<"%.!> ">i4 yh'0[ls
fiff [Jp/M
^Ak-~'r 7*i- 7
-------
IB*
LITHOLOGiC LOG
Sediment Cc!hciatei ft .'.tcir1 'enn>
Ooeiatoi Name (License # It Required)
L onaitude/£ds?i>vuG< f
£
i: WfcrfitiHi iTeiiip i iiclr i*onq»ton^ .vino direction)
j Surmv'pnurii/ , ' , ¦ £
Sampling tf|tnpment and Methodology iChuck Oh-O
Rotosonic -ft barrel _____ -m diameter
Core. -ft bairel -in diameter Manual Pusn/Vibracoie
Grab Sample I -ft x _
Other-
Sample Collection Method.
-ft x i -H BovPonariVan Veen/Other
n F»ninn Ucrlh ''i i
h Recovery (tti
15 % Recovery
16 L(
Interval
tOnotM
Description of Materials
fi'aia eJirnerittvpe. pre'Wii'i orii" sn°ti) iWj iih
Sample 10
uses
Code
A /)
tk
Grab Sample
{-0-0.5 ft)
Other:
1 n
-------
Loeatofe'BcyiRg timm
mm^X
Sheet
l sf 1
cQBE :^
¦ '
7 "TongitudeJ^
5/0
10 Coordinate Systems
-ft barrel
-ft barrel
ie)
n diameter
-in diameter Manual Pusb/Vtbracore
-ft x 0.5 -ft Bo>|^onar|l/an Veen/Other
SfrnpOmeimmrn
See Surface BeialiOR 11 ^ jf f
« KAIJ83 V MAVI58I!
ti Depth of Water., ft i *"• ~arf '""no* r
' ' ' *. 1 "'
12 Weather
Description of Materials
Major Sediment, type, color, presence of SAV/rockfwood, odor/Sheen, other inclusions
16 Location Notes t
C-4ffzh- C
ilt&n i. I «fO^
drJl AM
4c)
Sample ID
5eC > *-€€-4" /r#»^ 0
uses
Code
3€? ^
ijSmij)
On
-------
BA lITHOLOGIC 1 OG
$:uiment CQlipction Leg
t-'l EnoioeC'iing Saeinrn £ recnnoiogv Inc PBC
( 1'cnt N-ijtk cine r*»< icct Nri.-r< -
Lccrilion/Bannq Name
t I
> J
I
G< oiJQ ti Ndtnr 3i9't.:l'irr
5 Piojecf Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO j
ih Slr'.H
6 Start Date/1 ime
Slop Dare/Time
fi \A
. •
f
lie
A /i *j* >
N $
¦ - ¦
2
Drilling ojtjeofitiactoi.LauipmctkOperator
6 Lafilude'Northin^'^fiU
ci St;d burlace Elevation /
' {
1U Cooidinate System h V r,.» „ i
»'•¦¦ ¦„ o :!¦" !:
-ov. ¦¦¦
12 WtMthw (Temp wirul dtrec lion) |
Sunnv'tflouds'-Rajn J
A
Sampling Equsoment and Methcdoiogy (Check One)
sB<,-nna Depth u>'
i J p*h« over/ »fti | 15
" < rVrnvcrv |
Rotosonic. -ft barrel -in diameter
111
i
i
/*) $/
Core -tt barrel -in diameter Manual P'ush/Vibracore
i
i
Grab Sample
-ft X -ft X
-It Box'Poiiar/ Jan Veen/Other
1 ¦" l ;cat'?n Not
T;
Other.
Sample Collection Method
Interval
¦' ¦_
Description of Mfrtetiafe
MrV.r Sr'lii^ent vof- r vkr? S w roJ. vVirs^ uiU -hr-^n ofter ft
Sample ID
twe
„..f- / ¦¦ ¦ f ¦ ::
Tfl
1
5i*,(<}*£ Cckinfhp*,) fi'\c
t
s ""
Other:
lAtck +» T^1^-
-------
m
L1THOLOGIC LOG
Zedmitiin oolkc'im Log
EA E'fjl'h'Ctutg S Trc/i'Wom / k >V.C
C rtt-ri! Name and P'oject Name
I cicdtiori/Bnnrig Hdirip
Sheet
1 of f
Geologist Name.t.ig nature
"> Diiei>lb of nVjtei it <¦_->t >rt thiI!
3 Operator Nairn. (License 4 >! Rci/hiiedi
Longrtudo'EdaSngitSi if
: if.'jata i Temp cirolw^niiinons. wnJ u.iection
ournk Fa^r i -
"¦ Sampling FvjuifJinent ami Methodoluay (Check One)
RotosLHin; -ft narrei -in diameter
Core _____ tiarrel -m dianietei Manual Push/Vtbracore
Giab Sample -ft \ -ft x - -ft Bo*'Por:ar//an Veen'Other
Oihe>
"onnu Depin irti
Sample Collection Method'
!4 Ri c-jv'-i /! "ti
18 Location Notes
5 % Recover*
Interval
(Daplhi
Description of Materials
osdinteiit t.pi.', pffii'u .'i" 3A''in-.'<,vioi' ydu oilmen n:h-,i ihJunans
Sampie ID
uses
Code
3b Sample
-0-0.5 (!)
3 —
Other:
hfO1*-
S%0*&~76 -t-4~
- 1 ; ... ¦*. ^.5 7 dlv'^'n -£"*\
¦4j
• Ae^. >i,-%
1 /'V,L
In «f~l 1 —4^ I f f I! LC J-i >'
-------
Wi
Li THOLOGIC LOG
tollmen! nr,l)fci,or, Loo
CA cii Mtct-tuh) S'.'ificv, S. If, h'toioyt ift PBl.
Client Name ami Project Name
Lcration Deim > lnm Materials
M itur'JeiiiiiifiitlyiiP culr nrrxpcjrcsny/mniv.v.ioil oiJotJi-^h- ul'it-n i ; Jmor
Sample ID
uses
Code
Graf) Sample
(- 0-0,5 ft)
Other:
£tck ¦i-le^ac^icfx 5 j#,
J&A'h 5-
liyiCidiVi iA^X 4*
-------
UTHULCXJiC lOG
Sfotment Cvila'ticn £ og
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology, Inc., PBC
Clieni Nant .mti F>'oif„. Name
LocatorrBounri '-lame
Sneet
o)
l Geologist Mame.'Signaluit"
P'oiect Nj no;
CORE COLLECTION INFO
Start Date/Tipiu
otojj r-ate/Tmif
2 Dulling SuboonfidCtDiiEciuipmunl Opsiato-
bed Sunace Devlin
0 Cocrdinjft S'-steni
'I Depihi (•¦.Uitcrw
{>perafor Name tL'ccnse # If heauredi
i onpttucletastinQ CSn
IJ ("prnp cm 'Jp oof k ill nnc., 'hft'.-ttonj
S'lnny/Cloudy'Rpin
.1 S-itnr!ina Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
i—|
5o ing D^pth'.ft) ! -i Recrwew (ft) 15 y-Recovery
jRotoPonic
JCore
iGra.^
-1
-it 'aai'ei
-ti bard
-n x
•in diameiei
it; cliametei Manual PushA/ibracore
-ft x -ft Box'Ponar/yan Veen/Othei
16 locatiun («tes
(Othbl
Sample Collection Method:
interval
iDepih1
Description of Materials
|f.i Ssdinerltvn-' .-i lo- rrerswe ol o^vVoti.-wnxi uiJot'UKt.t oih»i >r.
Sample ID
uses
Code
Other:
,<~,<*0 e/kv€^t^ S^O,yS £+-
i , \t "3 /. f
1
-------
UTHOLGC-1C LOG
«rJ'-ru «r C^t'&etn ri Loo
E-\ Imh'^ ti'cn- - * fr->rhn>*/, hp n>u HdC
Client niA/ibrac.oic
GrjL SatT.p'e ¦' fix -!i \ -fl Box'Pondi/.^at) Veen-'Oflter
Din^r
Bor-.nn L)»pth ifti M Recoveiv (tt;
1S Recovtiiv
Location How*
J
Sample Collection Method'
Interval
\Depih)
Description of Materials
ta.-i >ditn-*m ryuH, colut nit/sw> >¦; „"Av rn •». Afni olorist".p"" itmuiiuu Wis
Sample ID
uses
Code
Grab Sample
{-0-0.5 ft)
Other;
^•,"e
I,, |i. 1-0 "jfJ
\ 5 1
/ 1
-------
UTKOlOGI'." log
*iedimpiv f olk-^fion L<>;
EA tng"tecr;ng Sconce d'>nchnotogv try- PSC
tHme aril Pr">jer
Location Pot.ng ijanv
Sheet
I
j Goplonisl Mafw'Signafij-
5 Pi'iect Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
3 Start Date/Time
Stop Date/Time
Doling tubconiiact?r,tq -ft x -fl Bu.vPunai/ .'an Vt-en/Oihor
Othei
Sample Collection Method'
Bonno Depth (hi
!4 Recover/ < ft)
15 % Recover
1<- I CMhlP tJnrp-s
Interval
iPcpfi'
Description of Materials
dniiet ityiv col-jt pr'-seiiwjt --''."'oa i«mii .icti">i,he> n ¦tin r n ,'n.sor.
Sample (D
uses
..uue-
Grab Sample
Other:
M&
U !>
-------
R
A
i JHOl CG!f mK.
riitrn! Name and Ftniei I' a me
U'ratitvVPorinci N.jiit.*
Sheet
«Hh
'\tiiinviS CollPC,n) i'.iji'
£-(tiPt'e"ig >cer,cv 6 T'.-'~tntoksj\ >K ^rC
HT16-<£
! or
'
Gcoiogi,; Mame/dqnatur-
5 Pioicrt Mnntoti
' CORF C0U.PCTI0M INFO
6 I f «
fVi t\ A /|r% 1/ a f" TT
( w v !• fw'
f.;<::: ¦>. -7
r> Start Ddte/Time jSton Date/
ime
2
DinNnn Subconiractoi 'Equipment Operator
6 Laiitudp.'Nortinno'f.'fKi
SjJ biiiTacc Ei'jian^n
n
Cascade
'% /I 7 ?%$ ^
5 j Ccuraiti<3t<-'i
ystem H NAD&
|
! i Deptn i'i Watt' it lituiVsna
h
Operate Narne (License# 'f/*'P_fi«W)
7 L unyi-Lidc/ildslnrj/'Tirid
„
1^ Weather ijemp, circic condwc>o> wind direction)
i \! y fi |^|i, A r >! |
.-ft
Sunny/i-buoy/Ruin
UfZl "*«
Eft*?
i
Sampling Equipment =nid Met>>uJnioyy (Check i Snei
13 ourmg Dtpth i rti 1 F.ecoverv !fr>
15
un Keccverv
RoEusom'C -ft barrel -in diameter
Core ttbane' -in diameter Manual Pi,abA/ibraco'e
Grab Sample '¦
-1x -ft
¦ -it Box'Ponar/yan Veen/Olher
IB Loration HoiBf-
Other:
*
tinmpie Collection Me'hod:
i $4* * * *
^ ^ i ~€
interval
Description of Materials
•Sample ID
use
tueinin
Wr-f r Sedimepi iype cdf preiriHe>J j.-tv-Mivh,'! nhti hi.ju.iupj
Code
) Aydtvc aMi 9
# 1/
' ^ r >7* '* ":%j-\ A \
Other:
-------
j£A rHOLOnj.. LCG1
3r3in r"* Cdlecrnj^ ( n$
E.\ Fponh-'dtnq Sih-rv.f- >•< ' fi-^no'cg)' *nc t PBC
C 'ienr hsm€ arti Project
Low^tioM Soung Name
i
3ltt.ot
! Of I
1
5 Project Numbfc!
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Start Date/Time
Stop Date/Time
, ' ¦ - 1
''K;*4 3 l!V 1 1 -'*1'
I
t-'nllny L-i'bi'onii^.-loi'Liuiiniiis nr Opesalor
b I a'ltude.'Nonhing/OrKl ^
9 Sed Surface Ele\ anon
ft
Cascade
, 1 f- ' r
K) Coordinate oysteir
it
11 Depth of Water, ft (s^rtfcrd t
Operator Mrjme (Ln o^Ss? # 'r Re^wca)
i onQitudcVt^stino'ij' ni
-
. fWf-/&
_ „rti t„ , .
1 ? Weather (Temn nude condition-.. v./«nd direction)
Sunnv'^CScidy/Wain
s
Sampling touipinen" anH Methodoi*" gv «Chrrk Onr »
! -i Bonng Depth ift)
ii Rernx^a- (ft) f 1 5
'¦¦j Recover !
Rotosomc -ft ban el -in diameter
8 11 r" "f
-ft x
> -¦$ Ficx'Fona^^dn Voen/Othe?
<6 Location Morei
Other
¦J- jmafmi
Sampie Collector) Method
interval
•Depth)
Description of Materials
f<:>jiT It nm nl Ivw cobi pn: ai'ho ' f Svm« k'wood, nciopslwri mm-" h»i U ix»'
Sample ID
uses
Code
"30g 705, S13 r
3^,3^^ 1 fan*
•j
-------
UTHOLOGIC LOG
Snili'nctU Coltr>ct'oi < i uu
krt E'wi i f.,"-'B<
C lic-nt Namt antl Protect Kame
Location Buiing N-nne
Sheet
1 ¦jeoioyist Naui^'SiO'idaii-
f. PioithJ i.umhfef
CORE COLLECTION INFO
Start Dace/Time
Stop DatciTimc
2 Diiilinu bubronttdt tni bquipn-ent Opeiflt^r
b tatnuds/Noitltnnj'Gi'c"
9 Seel Suiface tlevation ~
3 Ope^tfir Name (L'O'i'Sr f1 It Required!
I /I , I I**? I . I
10 Coordinate System
Dtufti ol v\afet it isforuendi
I cnniitudb;Ear.Mig/Cu 1
4 Sampling Equipment ami Melhotiolori/ (C(icr.k One)
Rufosontc -ft oarrei -in oiniruiei
Core ft Ddirei tn diameter iVI.-e-ual Pu'fh.VibiscoKr
Grab Samp.e -ft x ft x ¦ ft Box'l-'onar//an Veen'Other
Other;
Sample Collection Method
vveatrei 11 em(-, ;ir;fe *»vncMicn:; j/in.1 di.ertoni
' 1 Htinn.i Clotjav'Rein
o.in<> Oc|i.h it-i
14 Recover1, (Ft'
15 i Reco\i
V, Luc aiion Nuhr.
interval
I l npxt 11
Description of Materials
y,1l Jf'jedm.f'it tvje, 1 Jur pn.>:iv_ i/L'Viii, I/mu' • rj...-,.,| .--n nftnr. 'ut'Oiv
Sam pie ID
uses
Code
-------
m
LITH0L06IC LOG
wl/fc .-rator
LjirtuUe/fioitlmta/Uiw
3 Operator Name t License # If Required)
Sea ~uil3ce E':~ja>ion
C p'jrci'natf oyiteoi H
i 1 Depth o; Watci ft u-iartendl
.onnitii'le'F«'itiri;!',C-i
Weather iTvmp, -I'cL ' ond.ton.» *\ind<.
Suniiv;Cloudy tCh- c k. .tit i
Ro'iosoric -fl _____ ""*• ctorneter
Coie -ft oai rc,! in diameter Manual PusWViuracoio
Grat» Sampi-r -fl x -fi x -ft Box'lJanar//art Veen/Othei
Glhei
75 Bering Depth if.t ' 14 Recover/ f'TT"'•'^ Racovery
^diiiplr Collection Method
interval
i Depth t
16 Location tsiniss
Description of Materials
Crcinc1! !yp'- (U"r p^senee n'V-Vror or > nty'^feen nl1^ M'rlu^n^
Sample ID
uses
Cooe
Grab Sample
(-0-0.5 ft)
Other;
f
-------
IS
Other;
,%v!k4
-------
E£t
LlTHOLOGfC LOG
'¦r <7i Ip C'Vk Ch II
il'lLi'l ih< I !rfnih,kji 111 ' »V
3lient Namt and P'oitci
Locd'ion'Bonng Name
HT1S- ! ti
Sheet
of
1 Cf oIoqit 'Jii'it'Mini.U'
*i Pioject Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
fa Start Date/Time
Stop Ddte.Timc
DhHifv; Suucontid^ti;! E-^uioinonl Counter
6 Latitudt/Noitliind'Uno
9 C.eo ?Ul[dCe Ek: VdtMl
!0 i_oftdN>efe hvstcn
V Nf
11 Depth of Water, ft {start/ere!)
3 OpeiMof Nams- {License ft II Rf
' i ^innY'ilou.!,1 R-u:t _ _
4 Sampling L>iuiprr>ent 3n,< Methodology On=,\
Roiosonic: -Ft bane! -in diameter
Core. -ft haiiti -in diametei Manual Push V'biacuir-
Grab Sample -ft \ -fix . -K Box'Perw/.'-in Veen-Other
Other;
11 tu.'pp Ocptn |W 1-a \ff,
Sample Collection Method
Recovery
if IMotes
Interval
'uapui 1
—¦
Description of Materials
Mil r ',11m> 11; Ivpc-, cnbi d>e'A"iri' ..>1 &aV"u-iwrotJ, vln.yiee'i >.+ ;-i iiu-iUr
' CUfrpfcl V '
hifiti- -he, -miy i?f
-------
I ITHOlOGIC log
o«%>eof l'oh<=ct.o'i '-i"'9
EA BpQi'Wiii'g Sciercv 6 Ta 'iiioi.yy hie I
I In >ut Nartv ui'u I r r k c ¦ No
Locatton/Boring Name
Sheet
of f
i Gcobgist f i^me'Sigriotur-
CORE COLLECTION INFO
5 Start Pate/Time
Slop Pjte/T»r»:>
D'H'in.j ~jiilK.ontiactoi'ty'iiijirien! Opriator
6 Lalif j> i^r-ijy {Check One^
Rjtosomc _____ -ft bat mi -in diametei
Core -tt barrel -in diameter Manual Push/Vtbracore
Grab Sample __ ",f 1 -ft >
Othet
Sample Collection Method'
! < Boring Depth I ft) [ 14 Recovery (ft) j if, "n Recovery
-ft Box'Ponai/Van VeervOlhei
16 I ccation Notes
js.j-4-
Intervai
fOeptb!
Description of Materials
Waiti, J^i.iiTPiit Wre t ot A: n n I •• lu, :i • t hi- im 'i<
Sarnp'e ID
uses
Cooe
Graf) Sample
\-t' il)
Other:
-------
LIThC'l-C'C-H", LC'r«
Sediment Colvction Log
E4 Lnyintrfrina $aat,ie C 1 ¦*€hnoloyj/ i». PBC
i Geolo'i'-t l"1*.ry bubcontiot.'oi/fcquipnieni upeiatoi
3 Oneiaici Narrit- ,Ure ?se # /.' Rr
Cisem Matpe diici i 'reject Name
Proj'
5 Latitudwfio! t! ihvi/Gi in
7 t rngitiidtt/LablingcjiiiJ
Sheet
at
CORfc COLLECTION INFO
fct Start Date/Time
Stop p^tn/fime
0 bfO ouilite CiB«ation
10 t'roidmato oyr-tnn
M [tHi-iti cf -A'ater UMarKmi:
2 Weather {[emp, urcleccwluon•, 'aiuo duecfioru
Sunny'CiCiiidy/Rjir,
» C-jnipiinu Equinm»[.t and fiVihcclolugv 0'iti
Rotosonio -fl bairei -in diameter
-t-i barrel -in diameter Manual Push/Vibra^on?
-H • -It >• • " -ft BovPoftarjl/ari Veen/Other
!3 Boing D~pih (ft;
uoie
Grab Sampl-r
Other
Sample Collection Metnod
! 4 Recover,' (fti
15 Recovery
In > oc a lion Folios
Interval
i Depth 1
Description of Mater sab
Star '.cdinvnl ty(ip ,olo< prfcien -3 l-( r^Virrk mmpi .4'
. r din. inw i» i
Sample in
U5CS
<
T
Other:
I sb
I?*, 0 -f+
. .. , : ' 5 7£j,£lti I -ft
«->» . •• r- i J- ?-&, lifi~^Z7Z
¦ .« ^ ..i .. / .« I / *
Cot«, cJzMf- gt! /Me '
>-,A : -b. 3 0 "7 11 cf»I? $6
/3*/£7SW. S"7< fvr4k>^
0 ' /'H <21 Sl> j?.'YU^
p a- J#
»¥0J#*,+ A&XS- JC~-7£J- ' .V, 1 'A"*
»: ay*** •• '- X
so*4k wesi^:- l.jT^3
/>$:rsi- 4(Lfc€.ss '*7-^/- rt^rik l
/'if J ,:v;„ -¦¦'»
-------
m
UTHOtOGIC I or-.
SeiJuvent Cejection Log
PA Engines/mt) Science S Teclmolcgi Inc P8C
C hem N site and Project Name
r.at-in Boiing Name
Sheet
of
1 Geologist Narvte/Sionatuic
f> Pioiert Ni ml>et
CORE COLLECTION INFO
Stall OaleTime
Stop DateTime
2 Diillmy SiiL^cnti^ctnKF.qiMpn-v'tTf C'lv.rat'n
h t atitudo. f lorthin 1
9 Sfr.l Su'tac.e Eif vation
,i) Coo>dinaw System
Depth cf Vt'aiei ft tstarffo-.l)
3 Operatoi Name (License # /' Required)
Longilude'tjstirifl-,r-.n«"j
!2 VvoathT iTerrip, "in il- corid'tions, Aind direction)
ounhyiCiotiifyiKain -
.-ii-irriDliiXi Lqnipmen! ami Method 3lc.j/ t\ hec« jnei
Roiosonic -ft ;j3t-ei in diameter
Core' -ftbane-i -in diameter Manual Pu^h/Vibiacore
Giab Sample. ft x -ervol
Description of Materials
M.im t;voe,1 H»- u.J(«ish-sn oihasn-l-i on-
Sample 10
uses
Code
Other;
!'
I
-------
jgM| LITHOLCXjIC LOG
Sednnen' Co!inciiwtnt: i>cienc? & •nr. "'BC
Cliert Name and Ft'.»|€vS rl .tut!
Location, Bon Manic
Sheet
or f
1
Geologist MarwSignat'iie
Protect liumiX!
CORE COLLECTION INFO
ft
5 Start DateiTirtw
I'ly 14 w/ | v' y*
Slop Date/Tii ne
/ |
-
Drilling 3uDcontia^toifEauipnx-m upeiatcr
8 Ldirtude'Morthiiig/Gi!':l
•j Sec) Surface Eievanut*
ft
10 C oci tin idts System
H NAD83
V
!i Depth o' Walci ft ibt^rt'cndi
3
Ope tvpo, ">ln piy.iu>u"i; '¦/ \, u , > »i .¦ nd 1 < !w inni'j>ens |
uses
Cor1"
—" l—" ——^L__ . ... l VJ H_l P
.. « J . : Ji, ; ,1 i ¦' ''.V1 ' ' /,¦
Other: , jf-l
3 -f-b
-------
m
LI7> OLOGH, LU-o
'uih«L t Nortlun , i emp circle <"ondU."ir., v.vtnd liu^uoti.
1 1 Sunn^Clfju.i'^R.iin 1
4 Sampiiiia Zquipm^nf and Mot!icxiolo jy (Check One)
1
-ft Darrci -m diameter
Esonnq Depth (ft) IJ Recovery irb 15 'n Recjvury
iRotosor.'c
Core:
-11 hartt
-;n diameter Manual Pu&n/VibiTicore
Grab Sample -f
Other
San-pie Collection Methcw
-fl x
-ft Bok'Ponai/yan Veen/Other
Hi Location NoU~S& J* sloJl«»w i* s/'/5
44,1 ^1/%}^ >^U^§ -6Lr4.tr
!}f
-------
m
L'iHOLOGIC LOG
^r>r Cutl?ct>or> icq
4 S"<-trv.t x h oih^ogy me rbC
Gls^nl Nciru-. jnJ ^ j.hc t . ia.ne
LorjDon/Bwmu Nrt-n.
3he ,,^-x f?„
5 Protect Number
CORE COLLECTION IN"CJ
? Start Dale/Time
Slop Date/Time
oitui otl!idaui't".-uiL.ii|t.nlOiv,.iitoi
6 LMilude-Monhi^/C-itd
0 jed Surface htevation
t o C Dominate System
H
t/ 'n< i.,t
Ooerater Kid me (License It If Reauurd)
11 Depth ot Wdtei ft isiar/enUi
Longmioe/f dbtiniTbinl
12 Weather (Temp, elicit conditions, wind direction)
Sunny/Cloudy,'Pdin '' -
£ Sai, plinn r/v>ipnu?pt and Ite'htxlu'ugy iChecH Om: i
Rotosonic; _____ ft bjiiel in diametet
Core -fi ii^tiel _ -in cromeier Manual PushA/ibrae,orc
Grab Sample -ft x -f> * j -fi Box'Ponai/v'rfii Vten>'Ot>ier
Other:
13 Bohng Depth (ft1
Sample; Collection Metnod,
Recovery (ft)
% Recovery
!>" Lzrjtai Nows
Interval
Description ot Materials
Sample ID
uses
iE>ept*>>
flVn tvix u1!'1 '»i-->;nu ul oHV'ioi cc-.Irh" >'l! nri-irHr-in"";
> ue
Grab Sample
4 ./I. mASx4 sfo/h
4
Other:
gjhot €'ijAfA-'*"1
tfUok 4
to-
5-
-------
m
[ 'IHt'vCijI'" L>"\"
^ "i i ak fan I o j
Em EtviPtViiriQ -5c"rn,c TtlI ,ioiutl\ f. pGl
v.)lent i.lciie and r >ofi-o Name
LOGfltion'Boring Name
Sheet
of
I Geologist Ni«tk' Sifinatyir
Fillet t Humb*!M
CORE COLLECTION INFO
Start Datei'Time
Cn'lina ^ubconhaotoi 'equipment Opetotof
6 Lat'tude/Norlliing'Giid
serj Simare Ofv rmr
Coordinate System
Slop Date/Time
~«pin n! \A ater r', soit.eiidi
3 Opeiatoi Name i Licence H li A'ei/iwecf!
Intuitu Je/fzast; ict 'Gi ,ri
1" VA-v.-tnx.-i (Temp, opjitisni mp:I anectiorii
Si i>n\ CloudV'Ndiir
—I
F
Gonp'ing Equipment and M^thi-aokxiv (CliocK One)
Ruiosonin -ft Daw _____ indwrneHi
Core -it oanei _____ in diameiet Manual Push/Vtbraccre
Giab bamplc -n \ -f1 x ; -ft Box'Pnnar/y-in Veen/Other
Other:
Sample Collection Method
n DuHfu D'-pIn ifn j i J ih) j '5 " > Pwuvl,
Intc.'val
(Depth}
Description of Materials
Maul '-."tli-fint ivns, - cwi ic«-i'f -A\,,iuiodo-.-.l-eei) dM wIiii-io'V.
Sample ID
uses
o'ocv'e
Grab Sample
Other;
5" C+-
t:
/
-------
[EST
I vmm-ms
EA Enaineering
LIT^olChj-K LOG
Sediment Collection Log
n-P't cS 'tv-tntnlcujv hi, i'htj
v/l!>4ht N^rrv »nd f-io^ u N^me
i "LJdoi'borinci i ler-)c
Sh-rel
' 'j'-Cioafsf Nrinii-'^.n.iriiu^
5 Projed Numbtr
CORE COLLECTION INFO
? Start Date^ Time
J Stop D.itWhme
'101
2 Dnllinu Subcomrdotoi/Equipmenl Operator
8 laiiiude'^6itli!iia,'i3rnJ
9 Sari Sui Face Elevation ' k -
10 Coordinate SvMem l-l
Daplli oi Watei li ii'-'.t*n'endj
Operate Name |L/i>.»Sf It n F7eoin, e< i,'
7 Lon..jilufle/tasliiiij/Gud
Weathe! ^TernL- ardo conditions wi-vi diiect'on)
> , - Sunnyl'Cloudy/Ram
J Sampling Equipi tuii ^nd Mt'tholoiocjv iCheck One)
Rotoaonic -ft ban'e) _____ >n aiametei
Cce It ban el -m difiinelrr Manupl Pu~>h'Vibiacor«
Grab Sample " ti x
Bormp Deptn . -ft BoA'F'onai/^/an Veen'Otri':
Other-
Sample Collection Method'
Location Notes
lfllCfV3i
,1.' crpin,
Description of Mateiials
\1-iHr'ieiiriieiit!Yp'= 'Oici pre «nc;-rf S'W n« I v,'tri»1 t-'ii.-i >"'hi ri, rth.-r r-Iif
Sample ID
uses
Cot#®
' /
Grab Sample
(¦-0-0.5 ft}
Other:
SpuAjS ®
S So, il b
d€cJk, 4o 3 3, a -ff-
-------
U1 HOLOGIC I UG
S-'dmtenr Colie^Mi! Log
£4 EiQincerirtii Scvme iTtri»>t/oov Int i^PC
C limit N^mt- and Fmi^ct Name
F,onn.j i Innt
MT1R- *1*^
Sheet
of f
Geologist Name'Sigrmture
5 P'oiect Nurnbci
CORE COLLECTION INFO
Stan Date/Time
Sia(i D«tp/!>mp
Hiilltno Suhr ei^iraf-*o"Eqiii}>me>ii Or^rator
8 L-Jtili >dtj Mm i id
,_l . >eU Vu' f.«_v Ot -ii,
10 Coordinate System
Vpth n( t1 '.rUn'"in)i
Oo; atoi (License 4 if ifeqwed>
Kb
L'jrK|fttKl w«/
|f4# 4r0sl.ihe.f-
i; *!• Pi
-------
SMi UTHOLOG10 LOG
Sediment Collection lccj
£ £> (fneec'tQ ooevre !* :'vc>ino>c-j\ ir\ fjBl
C tent Name and Project Name
Location,Sot mg Name 1 Sheet
i ''' : I '
i Geofugi^t Name/Osgn-^uiie
' 1 X ^
¦> Proieci tli.rnbti
CORE COLLECTION INFO
f. start riate/Tinie
S«or> Dafe/Tnne
-• << ( 1
2 Drillhiq juLcontiactui'cauiuiixrt Oporifu
>
6 L^tiHiLSe/Nuifninp^Gnrj
u St d Suitacf" t', ft
tn >; c-'/ottm - ' t
npei.itOf |\Ulie tLtier$L $ it R*qt >ter
i D» pin rfWaif 4 i-Jd't'i ,idi
!" vV-.'th-* (T-mf . iici-ijonditioiio .vtral dHrrtioni
®> >;am ,i\
i Slinf I'rg Fqii.pi'tout intl M,LMhcyioL>g" i Check One)
Roroaomc -fitwnei -in diameter
Coie It battel -m diameter Manual PushA/ibracore
Grab Sample: ft « _____ -tt \ ___ -f
Other
Recovery (ft)
15 % Recc
BciA'Punar/ ./an VeetvOihei
Location Hofe
H
odituic C >1hi 'lort ftfpmud
Intnv-di
Description of Materials.
Mv i-dhiciil'/pe ro,Mrt pte:n.i n -,1 f . •m-J i ni n1nf.;fp"^ '.tfier "rUi -n
Sample ID
uses
Code
Grab Sample
i-O-O.B ft)
Other:
<4*zrte.
I ,
yd *
>r * §—
-------
> i ? HOLOG'C LOG
'ledinir nt Coliect'on t og
rA t. -u'nzeittig Sciente £« echnologi i'i: PSC
lieri Manic am Preset Naase
I occ.tion.bonr!', Im-smsc
Sheet
of 1
Gtoiou'^t Ncin>s,'iun£tt!te
CORE COLLECTION INFO
& Start Date/Time Stop Date/Time
is
Dmlinc; 'Suttronuprtoi'tquifmeni Op«sator
L.'-uiMicle/hortlnngj.1' -no
9 Seel hu'f3i>,. Elevation
i'j t -oorriinctfe bystP'T)
H
^tju'eskli
3 Oppr -tor Name iLjrvyUouJ%, Piin
4 Sampling Equipment and Metho lolog/ ^Jheck One)
Rotosonic. -ft banei -in diamctt-i
Cue -ft oatiei -in diameter toaruid> Puvh'Vibiacore
Grab Sample - -ft ^ -ft x _
uirssi
V.qr.j Di_f ilt |t!
M Recovery (fl
15 % Recovery
ft Bo.vPonai'.'an Veen/Of<>;'
Samnle Collection Method
16 Location Notes
Intsrva'
Description of Khtcnalc.
M i( i" lyiit f.'kji ,iff ,unr<-1 Ir •* ru»iii<^ii . irr ' r otl« im 'i ~r
3atnp!e !0
uses
IWil'
Grab Sample
{¦"0-0.5 ft)
Other:
Je^ek '' ,0>$
\o f^}k} it€f
-------
UT HO LOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
FA tnci'ipfiinq Science lecpnciogi
cipri Name 3rd I rojrrl N=3>n- ¦
Location Bonnr; Nairn*
of 1
JL*
1 GteOfOiiisf N^rne.'S'Oi'rsrt DateMtire [Stop rvite/Ti.rc
> - * - ¦ /_,<-. ^ % /,
Dulling buhcnrmdCturEquin-rient C'UPimIoi
6 LaUluiiu'Nortbiri;! Grid
oe.f U^»a>i'n
10 Cuordinah' Syi-n-rp
H
¦ ' IVpth ot Wil' i f| u.taiV^nJ'
Oosr«to> fianic |L/ceifSc ti !f Pbqtiited'
f Longiiuuc/Edsliii'j Pi id
i/ Vveafhei ,Tamo G,iCis-<4>ru»iti<>M-> vmts I rl
S&mple Collection Method
13 ?sotinq D?nm ifii
I"
1'! Raroveiv > , P-^very
i("> l.ii rftmn Notes
Interval
tUr-pi-.
Description of Mateiials
Ma or seun'li.rit tvpc u.'IOi ,»eitti"l„fcl-f l.UOI. "litennl'Kvnp:
Sample ID
uses
Cods
Other;
-------
LiTHOIO.j'C ion
SoJimt nt Ca/k'i ton Llki
LA Bmimeprurj Sn^n,-F .< lt.cin.4og) f-'C PBC
:iifcnt Name fnd Project M=irp^
Location Bor-ixi Ma" iu
She
of
1 Gtolccr-t NaiUfiSrinsUHe
J?i ^r% l\4.f»V^
pfO|*;ct N.n.ibet
CORE COLLECT [ON INFO
8 Stari DairfiTmie
Stop fvterrmie
2 Dnihn^ .iih.nit'rsririi'c^mpmert Operator
6 Latitude/Mnrthing/G'iti
3 Seel Surface Bevatton
10 Coo- diiwte System
l Depth of Wdtei, ft (iLirt'end>
Ooeidtoi Name tL>ct',se # 'f :?f*q,i<'eir
f
!2 Weather i Temp circjsjoqmMionr, i-mnd direction)
SiiiiDy/Ctoydy-RtWl >
SartipbHQ tquiprr^nt anu fvkUficMuqv (Check One)
Rotosonic -rt baitei -in diameter
Core -ft barrel -in diameter Maniwi FusK-Vibuioorc
Grat- Sample ' -ft v _
fWitji
li Boiiny Depth i;ti 14 Rp.oov£i"v ;iii i5 Recovcv
-ft A
-ft Box'pnna;,'rn V*
lb 1'X at'on I'lnie ,
Sample Collection Method
Interval
iOep//i i
Description of Materials
Mj|or Msi-mit-il tyf«- ,Tii-.r [-re e'n e ¦ tmi od<4 snlca' ¦ iii^r i-»l mr n n i-
Stirnpte 10
uses
Ci\ie
Grab Sampie
(-0-0.5 ft)
Other:
filA*$keA, tO ft, bud *'
y4 I#
i.A_. <=?..>/¦>• (°>S%)
7 . ^ <. '.'t s.-^i-h , °t f
irAjiJn if ft- A<-
-------
i ti>m x-i<: loc-
c,eriu>ien' CElection Loy
.... . . ¦ , ,
Oliem N-fmn jp;J Pio(ect Nam.
Loc-itfon'Bo'ino Name
^heot
1 Geologist Natne'Signauii'
5 rioiert Muinhf:
CORF COLLEC flOM INFO
A Sfsrt Date/Time
St^p D.iti'fTiiw
2 Drilling ;AitcontrdCtor'hatiipnienf up»ra>oi
Oprtulu N._ rut. ,Licon.ji # If Rvj,mcd)
b L jWih k*.'Northing'ond
9 Sot Giiiface Ucvaiion
10 Coordinate &> stum
1' Depth of Wale, ft rsldn.'-ndi
i I t>ngi*uiie'biiitny'Giw
I.' VVeailtf* (T«mp i ii'isXAjtiUitions vinddirection>
1 bumiv/tlouav/Pcun ,
It. ore
iinpin-n FqmpMent m<1 Metiioaoloiiv (Check One)
aioi-oi'L -n uanel ->n Diameter
-ft barrel -in diameter Manual Piish/VibMcoie
Grab Sample -ft x- -ft x __ -ft Box'Porta "/«'an Veen/Othe;
Othr.T
Sample Collection Method'
13 Rchthj Depth i
14 RerOvptv iff)
15 Recover
16 Location Notes
Interval
Description of N!d tenuis
Mafoi >dm
-------
UTHOLCC.IL logs
SpJimpn; Coiktc'irn L -g I
ntiynpei/pg Sconce S rt»-/"o'on l.tr |
Jlien! luw r,tiu p,oir>ct Nan if
locafion.Euitntj Narnc-
Sheei
of 1
i ' ,1-x-ingisf N^me'Sigiiatii'f"
IP _ „ f"i „
Picjec* Numhei
I »tiliidi''h'nnii,ngfciid
CORE COLLEHTION INFO
3 Stan Date/Time
Stop Date?fi»r>e
f# - .<
Sea ^uifa;e Lb-nMiiin
lu Coor imaU Si stem
11 Uf( Ih of Wutci H
7 Longitur'i='KiSt,i\i/Gi
n W^aHief ^ enip nir^^nnHilinn*, imp*! >t a>id Wsshodoiogy (Chwk. On?)
n
-t
jR close nic
C ore
Grab Sample
Ctiiei
Sample Collection Method
it battel
-ft berrei
-ft x
in diametei
in diametei Manual PushA/ibracoie
ft x -ft Box'Ponai/^an Veen/O'her
ffi LOLaho." Notes
Interval
Desci 'ption of NSateitals
M.inr "eiliFfin »,'» !,,IOi pfc'ienrr'Tj/'V'rocr'wmn crnr, Ji ¦¦ n inclu^i'irj
Sample ID
uses
Code
Other;
#Sf5> \Q ^
-------
LiTHOLOGIO LOG
'Irai/nunt Collcc>fon loy
E * tnameemg, Socn.x, S Tc-.-hno'og^, mc , rfti.
Client Nam* and PfOject Ncime
Locator,Borfnp Uame
Sheet
1 o«otoj»r* Maine*;?ijna«Li!c
Project {lumboi
CORE COLLECTION INFO
S Start Date/Time
DnHipg ^ubec>ntravAt#»,EuUipm«nt Operator
\ 4 c
6 LaTilua'-vNoatiiny/GriiJ V
• ' s4
0 Opeiatrr fJorvt {un ?. l/'
Lonniiude(lrdiUipg)'oiid
5 ¦ H
Stop Date/Time
ied Surface tlevation
10 Coordinata oysteni H -i,'l \ V !
1' Depth of Waw h , start-ei id'i
4~eua2 in ,
J Sampling Equipment and Mothodoleoy Onei
Rotosomc -rt ban el -in diameter
Core ft Darif I in diametet Manual Pusn/Vtbracore
Grao faample -ft ^
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
i/Vemhe' flemp crciȣDHdifinris rpclmn>
if" 1 ciirriv'ti;mtlY F-J'i' f
EOlffiC!
Dspfh-rTf"
-j Recover tfU ' 'j %ReccK,jrv
-ft x > -ft BoM'Ponar/Var. Vccn'Other
fli U.ra'ion Nuis;
rlf SCfs (o\i\ '•
Interval
(Depth'
Oescttptiort of Materials
Main* ie'limeiiltyO" .fll'.i o;°^Vifnj.'wooc Oilof'.-htfef! iftlvjnnrlmon::
Sample ID
uses
Code
Grass Sample
•J}
' ri^\
Other:
J 5 £"3, \U~T ''>r A$k
. ;4 ^dl.p w^rr"
f-n-nH f+
A»k.
A
S< -4? .<•
$, &
-------
L1THOLOG1C LOG
Scu-ve'ii Cmiecfcn S act
Eh tngmeet'ng Sc.r.re % i e^hiioiyj" 't t'tSC
Cli'-rit M inn ,iiU
bed Suiidcc Elevation
I'"i LOOirf'rate srfsteri H
3 Opeiator Name (License rf P yeqwa)'
I I»,«?/ ?*ift- T~f'//L.4£"
7 I ngibtilei'CaBPn-J/'inii
J Sampling Equipment and Methodology iCjiecr One)
Rotoscnic __ -ft bartc1 in diameter
Core -f! ba'Tal -in diameter Mam.al PusJi/Vibracore
Grab Sample > -ft >: -ft * • -ft Bo*'Pony/ ./an Veer
II Djptli of >/;jtri fi cjI,.'IVh<1i
t ' \Zvo«tht=f .T-mo n-« !e r.< mt v^ond iii?«actn'fi
^nnnwCioms H-V'n
''d Bourn DepHi ¦ h) } 1 * PMro^M smhV'I ! 5*'' .
H
Othe1
Sample Collection Method
interval
'' '
Dcbcripiion of Materials
¦ t,t" jr,ni,en! M i.itlu prf ^t-nre <\\ ,<« j , «i, ,i i i
M IK I 'I ,
Sample 10
USCS !
Co do
Other;
d-e c-ik a£?
!c>
-------
LiTHCLOulC LO'j
oVocneiii Cnihctm Lug
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology, Inc.. PBC
clieni Name atir. F" oitivt iwiu
I c\ aticwBonng rL-n>e
Sheet
of 1
hailociis. l-ianie ciqna u.f-
5 Protect Numbs?!
CORE COLLECTION IfSi^O
Start Date/Time
Stcii DaFe/Time
|U Ml |j
2 DrillMio Subcrium tot i Euuu Hnoft
6 Latitude/ttorthinfi/ii'id
" Sfir! Sun* a tk-vntion
0 Coordinate System H
11 Depth of VVatei It ptati/entfi
eidiur Narnu ..Lit asc # iTRcyuad>
7 Lotigmicfc/hastirig'bnrl
w\¥athur iTomp i'.uc[o agnations wind direction*
tunny,'Cloudy.Rdrri
Sfliip'trvj Ejuipmtfn' Mdhodinxiv iC,i>eck One)
RotCK.-jric tt bari-si -in diametei
Core -ft barrel -in diametei Manual P'u5fi/Vthrararc
Grab Sample -fix -ft x tt Box'Pon nv/dn Vc.en'Othet
Otlifci
Sample Col'ection Melhoo
' j Ponna Duplh (fit
overyift) 16 \ Kecovt-rv
cation Not-
Interval
i D--p*r,i
Deaciiption of Materials
'•tal'l 'nianlt'Ill '/(I 'an 1" .Iii'i' if I «. nu III ti 'I _ I ic e> < th> r ill- lb
Sample iD
ur.es
Other:
JiM-L U < '
^ k
m m /* ^
-------
M 1 ilHULOufC LOG
S^ci'm-ni isOlbsnan t oct
E* Engine any Ec^'.cc ^ "Vt hi oiQi\ >/P ^EC
'Ji3nt hum* cjn«"« D.o|ect Name
Hari'K>rtowa
L ."cabm/Boring N=imt; 1 Srieet j
1 Geologist N'WH/Siynjfurt-
h •.
r. Nun^-'
t'ORfc COLLECTION NfO ~~|
-» Start Ddt-e/Time
<> '
stop DdlwTttm f
2 Drilling SutxoritractorEquioment Opeiatfii
8 LatrtudaJN^rtsmg.fCirici
A '" i
j Si a,ace Elevation ^ , . , , ^
10 CocrdiPote System h • • V kS'»
M Depth r.f vvaint lustant-nri;
!,J Ooera'or iJan>j f.-P'-nsr #
7 L'jngsksoe^raftinj'r-nd
1 » „v ,/1 i
I ' t ' , ' t ' t
1L' Akathd .'Tt>F7ip, cticici.cpnc'iliCFis wiri't direction^
, \ ' ..... Su'iityiC loudy'Ram ,a 1
14 Samplmg Equipment and MethocMoqy (Check Oho
I Rolosoiuc -ft bane! -in diameter
I Core -fl barrel in dia.neM Manual Push/V.biaooie
13 Ccnrg Depth m)
t-l r:^r/V^rv RtCOve'v
Grao Sampie tl x
Other:
Sample Collection Method
-ft x
-tl BovPonar/ /an Veen'Olher
K- Location Noies
interval
(Depth)
Grab Sample
Description ot Mateiials
)(• wnl'vnt1 •. Jluf :-' ^ r "I S1 .i,rn<> tvi. u, uilo'
>Vr
sample ID
t-; ,U " -? •-*!
'¦r '¦?
USCP
Coo'
—f
Other.
5" stxwh&pl' ^3 — 5>~ik
n^k^ff 3 o ^ 2 o 3.3 o n p-
/3<^
M<-k -5^ <^Y "i
10 t 7
-------
LITHOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering Science & Technology. Inc., PBC
Client Name and Project Name
Location/Boring Name
Sheet
1 of 1
1 Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project Number
:f I ' l.
CORE COLLECTION INFO
Start Date/Time
Stop Date/Time
2 Dulling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
6 Latitude/Northing/Gnd
9 Sed Surface Elevation
10 Coordinate System H
11 Depth of Water, f! (slait/end)
3 Operator Name (License # If Requited)
7 Longitudc/ELasting/Gnd
12 Weather (Temp circle renditions, wind duecliufi)
? f SunnyCSoudy/Ram \ ,
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: -ft barrel
Grab Sample: ¦: -ft x
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boimg Depth (ft)
in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
ft x 0.;: -ft Box'Ponar/7an Veen/Other
14 Recovery (ft)
15 % Recovery
16 Location Notes
Interval
(Depth)
Description of Materials
Major Sertimeptiype, color, presence of SAV/roc kiwood odor'sheen other inclusions
Sample ID
uses
Code
'y fiMpf- / ^
-/¦u r 1 " -Lc /
/, f? Ay-
Other:
-------
»
6
UTHOLOGIC LOG
Client Name and Project Name
Location/Bonny Name
Sheet
Sediment Collection Log
¦ <¦
EA Engineaing, Science & Technoioqv Inc PBC
Kfuf '.'mi
1 Of >
1
Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
'
8 Start Date/Time
I '• ' !•
Stop Date/Tims
2
Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Opeiator
8 Latituda/Northin^/Grid
9 Sed Surface Elevation
ft
'• 1 - ¦
10 Coordinate System
H
V \
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
3
Operator Name (License # If Required)
? Longitude/Eastmg'Gnd
;
t ....... ...»
12 Weather (Temp, uncle conditions wind direction)
"¦¦¦
' ' ' • '
Sunny/C!oudy/Ram <£.
i
4
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One}
13 Boring Depth (ft)
14 Recovery (ft)
15
% Recovery
—
Rotosonic: -ft barrel -in diameter
Core -ft barrel -in diameter Manual PushA/lbracore
*
Grab Sample: 0 -ft x -ft x
'J-ft Box'Ponarf/art Veen/Other
16 Location Notes
Other:
*« i ™ c-' Js...
i
Sample Collection Method:
Interval
(Depths
Description of Materials
Maior Sediment type, color presence ut 3A Wreck'wood, odor.'sheen other inclusions
Sample ID
uses
Code
Other:
¦ . r;# &
- p U.f
-------
Eft
UTHOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science & Technology, Inc. PBC
Client Name and Project Name
GLAES
Location/Boring Name
Sheet
of I
1 Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Start Date/Time
Stop Date/Ttmo
Dulling Subcontractor/Equipment Operatot
6 Latitude/Northmg/Grid
9 Sed Surface Elevation
10 Coordinate System
H i"
11 Depth ot Water, ft (start/end)
3 Operator Name (License # If Required)
7 Longitude/Easting/Grid
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
Sunny/Cloudy/fein
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic: -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: -ft barrel
Grab Sample: u -ft x
Other,
Sample Collection Method:
13 Bon rig Depth (ft)
-in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
-ft x 0.5 -ft Box'PonarA/an Veen/Other
14 Recovery (ft!
15 % Recovery
16 1 ocation Notes
Interval
(Depth)
Description of Materials
Major Sediment type, color, presence of SA Wrack'wood odoretwen, other inclusions
Sample ID
uses
Code
C <£' /' /V.-'Vif Iaj>K K
/
Grab Sample
(-0-0.5 ft)
]cn c1
S'7"?. i n
>•$-* „{. {' (f/r V),, c fP it kj.lk ip fa
C't* f/y % --a)
j
f) I'*'7 S 3' f ( rfu-tf f. y -(¦ i?,1 it .i/t'V'- -If
W'-V llH s '5 '
/? " r,;,. <*?- J../ K,)
/ /, » .... 4.. j) , i
f^,S /'ftiiJvi J <'l c'lJ 1 h iV- .ffVV y/l.f /r%t« .l. 4*,A ( li{r'
' ' ^ ('si feV^r-, (*ip%)
-------
jg^Q| L1THOLOGIG LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering Science & technology inc PRC
Client Name and Pioject Name
Location/Boring Name
Sheet
J Ot i
1
Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
1 . ¦ ' ¦
l;
8 Start Date/Time
Stop Date/Time
: * '¦ ¦ I
2
Dnlhng Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
6 Latitude/Northing/G< id
9 Sed Surface Elevation
n
jV> h 1 t'',j
10 Coordinate System
H Jv.x-M*
V
11 Depth of Water, tt (start/endj
3
Operator Name (License # If Required)
7 Longitude/Eastmg/Gnd
'¦ 1
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions wind direction)
, Sunny/CloudyJRain
4
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
13 Boring Depth (ft}
14 Recoveiyitt)
15
% Recovery
Rotosonic: -ftbairel -in diameter
lJ ¦
c ssry.-i k^t er'.}c-^c. A*/
> /"V 1 J'f'f s I'/U-r-i !"<» '1^'
•* ,f. t s n f ' r*> . f" t A* J
n>s r-""xy" ( f, t
( '«'•* , t{f?V 5*f
f ('•*/?. (A,'V, h f-if- ,«t:* i /* T |l
*:/•''« : » i /
,1 • ¦ .
Other:
!-?
J^r44^- Mc~4 :n{i«rwi
>10''
iXJ-'j ¦ '" ' <:' c""(- ja-T**•t'-vy*'(r vX-f V- //.«<;• -sr.
¦t?A(tu~}~ i*y,jh <-hA{-eJ~ tt.,1 ,xAJ-'\;v^ ( }4~ r:h ^
>',lf • fi Wt'.vN f4c*c!"^ ^
-------
IJTHOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology, Inc.. PBC
Client Name and Project Name
GLAES
Harbortown
Location/Boring Name
HT16-Q1
Sheet
1 of 1
1 Geologist Name/Signature
fifl. Gelin
in
wm
5 Project Number
/) 6256128
7
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Date/Time Collected
Date/Time Processed
^11*511^
9 Sed Surface Elevation
n
10 Coordinate System
H NAD83 V NAVD88
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
2 Drilling Subcontractor/EquipmentjCjperator
(I
Cascade
u
6 Latitude/Northing/Grid
3 Operator Name (License # If Required)
7 Longitude/Easting/Grid
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
Sunny/Cloudy/Rain
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (C.heck One)
Rotosonic: -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: -ft barrel -in diameter Manual Push/VibracoreSonic }
Grab Sample: -ft x -ft x -ft Box/Ponar/Van Veen/Other
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boring Depth (ft)
\
(0
14 Recovery (ft)
hi ,
15 % Recovery
in.
16 Location Notes
Interval
(Depth)
Recovery
(ft,i%)
Description of Materials
Munsell Color: Moisture: Density: Consistency (Other Remarks)
Sample ID PID
Sample interval j (ppm)
uses
Code
0-
C\ Of o
(vtA-
i Tr#c£ orcpi
0O\o o-t"
f-^1'
C, b~
CMKpj, cXi^lcj
^5° "f l- 3^
-------
IP!
LITHOinoiC IOC-
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Sae.Kj 4 ftctwtogr 'fc L8C
Client flaw diifl Rmjcrl Name
Loc?ticw Potto Name
Sheet
of :
1 Geologist Name/Srjnerturc-
F. Pioieci Niii^bF-r
CORE COLLECTION INFO
P DateTime Collected Date/Time Processed
Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
6 Latitude. Northing Gi<1
Sed Surface Elevation
0 Coordinate System
H
.vAVi.-.
11 Oeptn of Wafer, fi (start/end!
Operator Name (License # If Required)
7 Longitude/Easting/Grid
12 Weather (Temp orclc condition?, wind direction)
Sunny/Ctoudy/Ran
Sc'trtpiit'O Eqr ipment . 14 Recoveiy (ft) 15% Recovery
-ft Box/PonarA/an Veen'Olner
'© Locat'on Notes
Interval
iDepibl
Recovery
(ft & %l
Description of Materials
Munccii Color Mo«siure Gently C'jnh'^wr.» v (O'hf-r
Sample ID PID
Sample Interval • ,00m)
uses
Cock?
f
< 5 1 , ' : 11 ;
"i •
. \I f 114 / 1 tli/l 1 Ifl ^ :
• '¦
Vrt k (Zffflj I
* f-T~T uX
rt .
....
- -
1
1 11
¦ " ~ ~~ r ' '" _ ¦
: . ¦ ¦ • . ¦ a ^'1
'¦ • .
¦ • ¦ - ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ . ' ' '•
4
-------
UTHGtCGie LOG
Sediment Collocticn Log
£'< Enyipeennci Saer.cP & Techrolog'/, Inc PBC
11 petit Name t>nu Froject Name
i.oeation/Bonrtg Name
Sheet
of
1 Geologist M^rne/Signaturi.
S Project Nuntuer
CORE COLLECTION INFO
DatefTime Collected
Date/Time Processed
2 Drilling SubcontractowEquiprnent Operatoi
6 ; Jlili icta N-jrthina 'Grid
9 Sort curtace Ewvaiion
ID Co-irdinate System
H
V MA VI
Depih of 'A'a'er ft (siart/eiid)
3 Operator Name (License # If Required)
7 Longitude/Easting/Grid
12 'A'eaihei-iTernp circle conditions wild direction;
Sunny'CtOiJClvRcSin
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic ___ -ft barrel ___ -in diameter
Core. '' -ft barrel -in diameter Manual Push/VibracorejSome
Grab Sample' -ft x -ft x -1
Other-
Sample Collection Method'
13 3omq Depth if)
Recoveiyitt!
15 "i Reooven,
Box/Ponar/Van Veen'Other
I6 Location Notes
interval
i Depth)
Recovery
fp f, %)
Description of Materials
VU'irre'l CcLi D.-r\-iK "cnaislnci1 .Ollwr P^nari
Sample ID , PID
Sample Interval i ippm)
uses
Code
0"
w
1-4
\¥f1
-------
LiTHOLOGIC LOG
Segment Coil*.char Log
E4 Engineering Science &lecnnoing} »oc, PBC
Client Name and Project Name
Locat.Dn.'Bonng Name
Sheet
of f
Geologist Nema Signature
5 Piej-ri Nurrb'-r
"ORE COLLECTION INFO
£ Data/Time Collected [Date/Time Processed
, y.
2 Drilling Subcomi actortquipn iunt Operate
6 i atiludBiftorthing/Gfr'
3ed Surface Elevation
10 Coordinate System
H
V h.'<0 ,
' 1 Depth ol Water ft (start ,'erto)
3 Operator Name t License ft I) RequiredI
Longitude/Eastmg/Gnd
12 iA/pnthfii f!>nipt rucle conditions. w.nd direction!
Siinriy/Cloudv/Ram
1
A Sampling Equipment and Methodology 'Cfie.ck One)
Rotcsoriic -ft bairei -in diameter
Core: . lj -ft barre! _____ -in diameter Manual F'ush/VibracorefSonic J)
Grab Sample: -ft x _____ -ft x -ft Box/Ponar/Van Veen/Other
Other
13 Bonnn Depth ^ft)
I <*. Recovery (ft\
1? % Recovery
Sample Collection Method:
16 Location Notes
Interval
i Depth I
Recovery
(ft s %>
Description of Materials
Mucsell tobi M-jiymc LXihiI/ Omsii.tmcj iONpi Remarks)
Sample ID PID
Sample Interval (ppm I
uses
Code
-------
LITHOLOGIC log
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science, d Technology Inc f^BC
.item l\a,n« in J Project Narre
Location; Boring N-jme
of I
1 Geologist N arm/Signature
5 Pioiect N
CORE COLLECTION INFO
5 Date'Timo Collected Data/Time Processed
DnP'Oij Srbooi'bactoi'EquipmPiif 0|>Malor
6 Latitude/ Nortbi ng/G rtd
y S sd Surlace E'evaton
10 Ccoiomato System
l l Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
3 Operator Name (Licem-v* a >t txf)
7 Longitude/Easting/Grici
)2 Weather (Temp, cit lit. eomtiiiuis inti direction)
fcfiitii'v'CloiidV'Ram
4 Sampling Equipment uno wthoooioyv ii,bei.k One)
Rotosomc: -ft bane! _ -in diameter
Core' -ft parrel ,t-{ -in diamete; Manual Push'V«r)faooi«.-V>ntcJ
Grab Sample: -ft x -ft x __ -ft Bo\/Pot!dr/v'jn vSan'Cher
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
13 B< >nnu Depth (ft)
1 F-u cov< ry itlt 15 Recovery
e-s
i.
?n Notes
interval
i'Depths
Recovery
,'ff & %)
Description of Materials , Sample ID i FID
Mupsell Ootar ftfosiuio Density i.woste!\,y (OSe'Sample interval (pp.ni
uses
Cede t
| | §H?
S(kA('Aki "n(VV i-4 tfroiyw* rm¥r\/iti « I ~OOlQ o-H*a»
V Gi«Ju, <
;C Hie \
™ • | i
lii4| (^^ anjja Uw U i o to - 91 -1
i i
mci <
iry c-"-6
.
(
-------
UTHOlOGiC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science S ? echnzlogv inc PEC
rtt Name and Project Narr
.afion'Ucriirtj I«3mr
Sheet
of
1 Geologist Name-'Signature
•> Pinpi , Nt,rm>u
CORE COLLECTION INFO
Ddls/Timu Colle.-tec! Date/Time Processed
2 Drilling Subcontiactor''Equipinent Operatoi
6 Laiilu >o/Mortlttrg i>'
? Operatoi Name (License # tf Required)
l.ongitude/Eastingi'Gi n •
a 5&d k'lfacfc Elevation
•i Coordinate system
H
383 V HjS
Depth of Water, ft (start/end1
Weather ^emp ciilI? conditions wi^d direction)
Sunnv/Clondv/Rain
4 Sanplinn equipment ana Methodology iCheck Oriel
Rotosonic. * ft barrel -in diameter
Core: -ft barrel -in diamefei Manual Push/Vibracote.Sonic J
Grab Sample -ft x -ft x -ft Box/Poriai/Van Veen'Other
Other
Sample Collection Method:
3 Bonng Depth (ft) 14 Recovery (ft', l 15 "o Recovery
1'" Location Notes
Interval
I Depth 1
Recovery
iff a 3o)
Description of Materials
MiiiiScfl rnt,! Moiils.re. D-jiSily '"oniiMcru , #. 1 * ni
-------
1*
&A Engineering, Saen~e
Li f HOI O'jiC LOG
-Jimci \irr,
Sample ID 1 PIP
Sample Interval (ppm)
uses
Conn
o -15
p*his
s-o
ilt| -fjicjre
c^tcMlS
* " " "
frtxs *
~»} - a
^KlhK
9^|, df».ltii| rrp;|4r¥i|- rV-uCAflO 'irifVltif
t ' ' " ¦
f M^pc r\ d&i-
_ i_ , , ¦
, ¦ yiut.lpit tfi
> c "3d-- fscw "
___
¦¦¦• ' . ' ¦
-"ZS^fO E51
'13
•fL~ + r€|4A5^€l caVwAS,
¦ ' • ' ¦ :: ¦ ' ; 1 ' : - — —
-------
¦ urHOt.OGir uk;
Sediment Collection Log
E£ l,PiutiaPtinu R Techoologv Inc , FBC
Client Nome ami Project Name
Location;Boring Name Sheet
1 < > 1 ot f
i Geologist NdinciSiuUdtuie
M, 6>
5 Project Uumuei
' colii COLLECTION INFO ' |
o Oatei'Time Csjlleeieu Date/Tima Processed I
2 Drilling Subcontracloi/Equipmunt Operator
0 i.ntituoK'Ncrtl iiiiii,'Grid
;« Seu Sur'dCt- Elev.jpotf ft
1 <1 Condnstc S\ start- H : T . \ , ">
li of Water ft /oUrUend)
3 Operator Name (License # If Required)
7 longitude/Easting/Grid
!
Samp'ii)
Rotosc
Core
G'ab S
Other
Samp!
I t'luipineni
Recovery
(ft & %>
Description of Materials i Sample 10 1 PID
Munsell Color; Moisture; Oenslly; Consistency {Other Remarks) i Sample Interval ,ppm)
uses
Code
Bimq -v3oi ' " 1 * /
•OOIO 5i~\7
cVxaWkj c 1*214- fK-C\ow^ \
1 ¦
\tr >'<
'pi50i
_ ^ ^
vn¥f\a6t. (sWW„
&~3c
¦
tt ;
y QyfOuui <
sf MiPfft. il
1 . K ¦ L 307. Ai5SM«^
HO ~<-
/
L Qxr
a, ' " ' |
! 1 -¦ ¦, J
o' G\
-------
w
£> f ll'I'tlLtll.l'i £>*' '0 'LI
LiTHOLOGSC LOG
Pediment Collection Log
Technology, Inc, PBC
Chen Narnt and Project Man.p
LocatiOin'Botiiig Name
HT16- t'M
Shesi
'• of
t Geologrt Name'Sianatme
Piffert Mumt-
CORE COLLECTION INFO
Date/Time Collected D,ite/Timc Processed
2 Drilling Subcontiaclor/eqmpmunt Operator
3 LdUud^tJonhthgiGuU
t! JC.l C Li1 'aC- E't. 1
1D C ¦•'Pt rtinott, c, '•tei ¦ i
H
t 1 Dspth Ci Win fi i»^rti'enii;
3 Operator Name (License # If Required!
7 longitucfc'East'ng'Grd
V #,->( fTemti . ir.jc o~ndt5cn> >vin J -Jirection
^tmtiy Cloi'oy R tin
.Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Qbeek Oris)
Rotosonic __ • ft t>ar>-' -in diameter
Core ; -ft barrel J
Grab Sample -ft k
Other:
Sample Collection Method,
13 Bonny F'epth (ft) 1 \ Recover' it?1
ir> diametet Manual Push/Vibracorei Sonic
ft -ft BcWPonar/Van Veen/Other
Recovery
16 Location Notes
Interval
i Depth}
1 I
Recovery
fft e %)
91
Description ot Materials
t"u> HI onl~r f"onu> l< " i, ( n-ruenc,'i miei •
Sample ID FID
Sannpls Interval ,
uses
Code
-------
L OTOLOGIC LOG
Pediment Collection I og
Z>1 hnameeiinp Scienter, ti Tecnnoiogy, Inc, FBC
Client Name and F>o|eci Nans
jcaiion Eo>>ng Namr
of
1 Geologist Nama'Stgiauire
}
5 Project Numoer
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Oate'Tlme Collected Date/Time Processed
2 Di!il--,g Subccntiactoii'Equipment Opvratai
6 LaTit'.ide/Noithin^'u!ic<
S Sed Surface Elevation
10 Coordinate System
11 Depth of Water, ft istaryen U
3 OoeMiur I'lirhe (License # If fce^nirrd)
7 Longitud
K fTfrnp, riffle rondm.>ns v/snd direction}
SunryCloudv Dairi
4 Sampling Equmment arid Methodology (Check One)
Rotosomcr -ft barrel -in diameter
Core. -ft barrel . -in diameter Manual PushA/ibrr.rore. Sonic
Grab Sample- -ft x _
Other:
1 1 Eiounci Dcpln nU I 14 Rr-covpr\ Jti [ 15 % Recovery
-fix
-ft Box.'Ponai/Vdi" V'fc'eo/Gt.w
Sample Collection Meihod:
Id Location Motes
Interval
(Depmi
Recovery
(ft & %i
Description ot Materials
Munwli Col-'" Mustum C-"iw* '"nn-r i*nu uJiiie' Kewnte*
Sample ID RID
Sample Interval ' fopml
?S!
* SI
, ; ¦
-
S/l M Cl£icifl% fl-«, t. « %,,
"*"* tjfc-"'' 1 ''••J
iaHj
fttt. 3'hW cAf^- W \€r»k^
~ : , ¦ ' _ _ _ .
-(03 o
8
¦
" _ " "
•
-------
LUHOLCGiC LOG
Sediment Coilecher; Log
Efi Engineenn^ Science i, Tecnnoligv, lie PBC
Client NarriP and Projet • Narr,-
satic
-------
B&
UTHOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Coiyrtion Lvg
S Lnomeu nq Scenre & lechitoioqv, tnc , PBC
Client N.ime and Project Name
Localion/Boimg Maine
Sheet
of
1 Geologct Nami 'SigrirtJi^
5 Pi ojec; Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Date,Time Collected Date/Time Processed
u bcontr at tui; Equ ipment Opciatoi
0 Ldiilutle'Nortr.iriij/Gnti
9 St'd Surface tbvation
10 Coordinate Svstern
D83 V NAVDS
11 Depth of Watet, ft (stait'end)
.3 Operator Name (License # If Required)
7 Longitude/Eas
12 Weathei n err>p, circle conditions, wind direcliori)
buriny^Cloudv/Rain
4 Sampi'ng Equipment. arid Mt-'iiijy (CK t 'ne
Rotosonic -ft baribl _ -in diameter
Core, - _ -fl bane' ' -m diameter Manual Pusli/VibfacQre-Sonic J
Grab Sample: -ft x _____ -ft x -fl Box/Poriar/Van Veen/Other
Other:
Sample Collection Method
i3 Being Depth ift)
14 Rerovery ift)
15 'Vn Recovery
16 LvCiitiOii 11
interval
i Depth!
Recovery
itt & %i
Description of Materials
Iv'iiii1.'.1 i Jim Mij'sini', i\n L"nci:-|Hr\ i uhti Mma*.-)
Sample 'D
Sample Interval
PiD
tpptn
uses
Code
-PO /in
L i l-ryi f/ll]pd dXtai \ '
5%v loti i |-|* c" rrier
r
-------
m
Sheet
1 of 1
LITHOLOGIl log
Sftltnv'i ft-lloction ton
:A Lnginerf'mj tctem.,- f 7i rn,i, k>i)\ iin fn
"'4 Recover-., (111
: Recovery
r ^
-ft Box/Pony, 'Van Veen'Othei
ir i OCtJti'Mi Ncte*
Interval
{Depth!
Recovery
{ ft& %)
Description of Materials j Sample IP P!D
Munsell Color Moisture; Density: Conastencv (Other Remarks) : Sample Interval (pprr-}
uses
Code
f 7
Q h
jOMht
¥ /I arm
'
A. .tott C!^2Lki tU _ 3dh itha/niA<\ i^Qrflu . j
t5
(MbgxXy
•b' \.t or,
~
|AC c
aof-.. 1
¦" l-jCs
U?<
Z "¦
! '
•
,
c\ ^fOXf. HCatfiT
I-/-
M'
———^
-
id
-------
LITHOLOGIC LOG
Seaimenl Collection Log
BA Bngmeermg, Science, & Tecnnologv lm PBC
Cent Name and Project Name
ot.dtionfBoiinq Nai'te
1 of
1 Geologist Manife/Signaiiife
5 Frofect Nuifoer
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Date/Time Collected Date/Time Pt ocessed
Drilling SubconiiacioeEquipntom Operator
6 Latitude/Northing'Gnci
9 Sed Surface Elevation
in Coordinate 3yst»rr<
11 Depth of Water, ft istar*j-?nd)
Operator Mj«ric cense ft if Required)
7 - longitude/Easting/!
12 Weather (Temp a,rW co'tdmoiis wind direction)
Sunny/Cloudy/Rain
4 Sampling Equipment and ivlethorioicgy (Chuck Onei
Rotosonic -ft barrel -'n diameter
Core -'l barrel _____ -in diametei Manual PusiWiotacot&Sonic
Grab Sample -ft v -ft x: ¦ ft Box/Ponat/Van Veen/Other
Other:
' 3 Qcps Deptn (ft)
1-| Recovery i"'
! h ' 3 Recovery
LLudHoit Nctes
Sample Collection Method.
Interval
(Death)
Recovery
iff L "hi
Description of Materials I Sample ID PID
yurwll U'Wr Voiswf, Umt'iv, u rr.Mprirv PUmr R, nvitji Sample !f>terv«:> iPfini
uses
CflMj
1 .
It 4 vf Swd fat) - W pctWfl- -
it.; . : . _
' -K
^ jho'I
.
f3 wo/r
: mml ti
• - . ¦, 1 ¦ .'
Yi11 i
•
>Kff ^ -viol
¦ ' "
i:
i
j
i
-------
JgM| U™OLOG''~ LOG
Sedim<-ni Ccikh "on Loo
EA Eryineeii'hj. Science X Jorimdivin- in: PRC
Ctent Name- t>n1 Project Name
L.xntirn/Bonng Name I Sheet
| of
1 Geologist Name/Stg nature
, *
5 Pioiti t Numbtfi
' CORE COLLECTION INFO
a Date/Time Collected ,< Date'Timc Processed
2 Drilling SubcontrjctojCquiprust* Operatoi
8 Lotiludeifloi+hinj/i.-rid
c ceC Surface Oevdtion ft
10 C» titrate SViKFi ri '' , v"
11 Depth oi Wdt€( i) ibtan.'cndl
3 Opetator Ndnie it ice-nse ft lf Requited)
7 Longitucie/Edsting/Grid
12 W*rnht-i H <=*mp cm W- svsrtcl dF^ct-OO!
Sur.nviClouciy/Kari
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (CJieck One)
Rotosonic: -11 ta"e> -in diameter
Core -f 03 it; -in diameter Manual Push'VibiaccieiSunic
Grab Sample: -ft x -ft x
Other:
Sample Collection Method.
13 Boring rif-ptu (fn U Rei.^vi-rv irt'
Recovery
-ft Box/Ponar/Van Veen/Other
j IB Location fiote
Interval Recovery
(Depth} (ft & %i
Description of Materials
M.III".Pll UUX iV'Clty n>hn '-tendt!>
Sample ID > PID
Sample interval loom!
uses
Ode
-------
IJTHOi OG1C LOG
.Vd/me-H Co!leai-?r Lay
£A Enanvttrtng Science S, Teamob-jv, ! K PBC
Clie»'< N-ain- unci P'o^ct Name
Location Bonpg Name
Shevi J
1 of ' 1
1 Geologist Mame/Sijnaijte
5 Project Nurnbe'
CORE COLLECTION INFO
3 Date/Time Collected Date/Time Processed
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
R l aMudeiTJorthirig/UficI
9 Scd Surface Elevation
10 Ot utiiitvti. System H
i 1 D»r h o' '/Vaiti ft isvirlitnd)
3 Operator Name (License # If Required}
7 Lengiludeifcasting.'G' vind cirieotion)
fr-unn¥>'"lciiu\"R,ii'!
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic: -tt barrei _ -in diameter
Core. _ -ft barrel _______ -m diameter Manual Pi'sWtuiacoieiSenic
Grab Sample. -ft x _____ -ft x -ft
Other:
Sample Collection Method
13 Boring Depth irti 'J Re-fMifv (tt)
. (?~ '•'jveiy
3ox/Ponar/Van Veen/Ctlier
16 Locate i Motc.^
interval
I Depth':
Recovery
{U d
Description of Mateiial.v ' Sample ID P1D
M"i"> II1 -hi i"' *-hi ~ r_n lv 1 on'~n in, i-iiipi r"*r :i-s) Sample Interval ippmj
use
Code
— '
« V
fYW^c
'
¦>
"3 f
i
v- < V.|
¦-
i:
--
-------
1-
LITHUlOoIG lOG
ZcOarten' CoWecSt.'? Leg
~A Engineerno Science 3 ToxJ)nobin inc PB'-
Ll-enf Name and Project Name
Location-Bomo Name
Sheet
: of
GeoiogiJ. Hcime Sinnoluie
5 Ft Ojert Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 DatelTime Collected (Date/Time Processed
2 Dnl'if'O Subcomractonhquipment Optastdr
6 Liititiide.'Northing'Gnd
9 3ed Surface Elevation
10 Coordinate System
H
11 Depth of Water ft (siattertd)
3 Operator Name (License 4 If Rtciutmdi
7 LonjrtuclP'E-.dSting.'Gi id
12 Wratnei v1emp, circle conditions, wind drectioo)
SunnyCiouoyRaM
Sampling equipment and Methodology (Check One;
Rotosonic: -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: ' ' ' -ft barrel -in diameter Manual RnshA/ibracote.Sontn
-ft x -ftx -ft 3o
Description of Materials
Munsell V-ivurr Oeictly: Consistency (O0w Sewks)
Sample ID
Sample interval
RID
(oprn)
uses
Coda
ni?-£ Ilriil *4 ^
frtJj
.<0,-3 2
:v!
5
Vjn
f .j&nd H (Jijkj (so l,\ jn^-i
u af>.>'">*-¦
L
r. .Scsjvy'i ywJ. ""I
-
OlVDW
u,c a.1^-wail . .. '
aai)M
301. wpo 'i 3c J.
-SoT?
"5
I v 4/"i a y:
& ' If .¦/ \
Ycd
:|f#Ct:'S0vvitf oS (Ami y
_____
Of 1 p taw
-L
TfK
fViM WiO'N
-------
I'THOI (X-Jli. LOli
Sediment Collection j_oo
Ci l-ivjiiir-^iinq oi eMt u re^hnoipgy hie PBi,
Client Name oral Protect Name
Location 'Boring Name
Sheet
of 1
i Gulp list flam-'S.t;na,uu
Project! mmbei
GORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Date/Time Collected Date/Time Processed
2 Drilling Subconn dCM 'Equionient Opetator
b Latitude'NoiHiitKrui id
9 Sod Sun^ce elevation
Hi C,orrd>n,ifi System H
1! Tepth cf vvaiet fit Man/end}
3 Operator Name (bceiKe # If Required!
Longitude, tavnu 3rid
12 Vy'tDfiCi 'Tunvj ,:.itoic cona.honi tvinc! Sire;tioni
Sunrty'Doi ovTair
4 Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Gnecl, Onci
Rotosonic -ft barrel -in diameter
Core -ft oatrel -in diameter Manual Push.Vibrar-of&tSontc
Grab Sample -ft x _____ -ft x
Other
Sample Collection Method:
U B'.inntj Depth (ft)
l*t- Ret;oi«t / Tij
'5 \ RtrCOvury
-ft Box"Jon3r/Van veen/Othei
Location Notes
1 Filer Veil
(Dtp ft)
Ro^onerv
(ft § %)
Description of Moteuais
Mun.-:ll Lo'or Mn-.i„ts Li^n3 ¦. fOU ei K>.'nwi.,si
Sample ID
Sample Interval
PID
ippm)
uses
Code
ifoimlf
x c\ ^ro.
wh
iCir ¦ •.
• i j 0
V
r tow;
1 £ 1 J"f ' ^
b
Jhf WKVL
.
-- - V ml'
"2o
¦ ¦¦
I- ^ If? ;'aif AlO )
... •
3-r-
'tJrCiro
TVQLC
•"v u
giciycX l/cji cli*^ tenkj
>7,
-------
LITHOLOGIG LOG
Sediment Collection i_oy
EA Engineering Science & Technology itic PBC
Client Name find project Name
Loc^Lioii/Bonny Name
l-
Stieei
1 of #
I Geologist Name/Signatnit-
Piotec' Numbei
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Date/Time Collected Date/Time Processed
Dulling Subccntiactoi. k quipment Dpnatci
u Latitude'Nortiing'ijici
y Seel Surface fctavattci
10 Coordinate System
3 Operate* Hame (Lice-^et if lA-qi'irecn
i.ongi!i irfe/fcastingn ,rM
I I Depth of Water, :t (suit t1'd i
12 VncJ|. 1 _mp i
ciieciiun>
Sampling Emiipmematrt Methodology [Check One)
Rotosomc -ft barrei -in dometei
Core' -ft barrel
Grab Sample -ft x
Othei
Sample Collection Method1
13 Bo-ma Daptn itl)
in diameter Manna! PushA/ibracorerSonic
ft x -ft Box/Poitdi/Vdri Veen/Other
Location Notes
15 % Recovery
Interval
(Depth)
Recovery
(f> & %i
Description of Materials
Wur.-.elt CoI.m Vribturs nensitv Ccraou.'fc > ~vin3i&3i
Sample 10 ¦ PiD
Sample Intervdi (ppra!
uses
Code
I©1i. "|7I '0 fifi4 f
" mm s
r>
^ .
IOJd |
^D5D
1
: x _ -
J cW% Sfmi $t>v£
?- w *> H:, ,,i te
rv^H •
¦ ¦ ¦
)o cn\wt, rqMifW
-------
E»
L1THOLOC-C LOG
Sediment C olfaction L,;a
kA Enginefttng Sneni.f- \ Technology, Inc PBC
Client Name =ma pi eject Name
LDCJtwBonng NarrK-
f
1 Geoi^qist Ndmc1-Sigriatuie
3 r 1 OjGCt
GORE COLLECTION iNFO
6 Date/Time Collected Date/Time Processed
SubcontractPiitauiDmenl Operatic
e Latitude'ltorlhinp.'Giid
s! SeU Surlare Bievstion
10 Coordinate System H
I 1 Deoih of Water, ft istartfend)
Opeialot Nam^ i! A
7 Lengitude'Easting/Grid
tC -A'ejthci fTomp uiclo conditions wind diiectionj
Cunoy'Ctoiidy 'Ham
Sampling Equiument suJ ft/lt-thotio oq/ iC'ic-tk OnsI
Rotosonic _____ -ft ba ny-1! i.,o'-v Moist'itr F_\-1>:, -v C meN-ncv iCWia ri-T.-r'..,
Sample ID | PID I USCS
Sample iiite:val ippm) J Coda
&Loe£
od&.
i' ^4
iC
-
!^i, m\\ (ie^grocUsf M rou^aU^
1 ¦ '-,cd«v
iCfeS
fyi -z\
¦¦
7,i '
,50 mi
3P m 'Bi
•>.S 0'i2
ibct sxvvJ (M
'
T\
2O*L.0K^ Ur\
-------
m
lithologic log
.>t,aimsnt Cfiftx'top Leg
EA Enc,vieurf,g, Ccicic^j i- ' Inc PEC
Chenl Name and Pioiprt rtame
Location Boring Name
Sheet
of
1 Geologist Ndme'Sicr-otui-j
Pioitxt Numbo
CORE COLLECTION INFO
h DuicfTTOt* Collected ;Date/Tintc Processed
"3^
2 Dulling Subcontractor'Equicn^ent Opcialur
Lattudc.'NurtnsngfS.ni
ounace Elevation
C-ooivJi'^tc System
H
3S3 V M
3 Operator Name (License # if Ret/, htpn
7 Longitude/Easting/Grid
II 'X-pin of Wdtei ft (Std't'cnd)
12 Weatrisr (T-smo ciicle conriiUivu- vi>d 'Ji'er.l'oni
^univ.i'C lc>. k«*> Ram
Sampling Equipment and Methc-dology iCnecl* rne!
Potosonic ___ -ft barrel -in diameter
Core. ft bat rei -in diameter Manual Fush/Viciracore»Sonic
Grao Sample -tt x -ft x -ft Box/Fonar/Van Veen/Other
Other:
Sample Collection Method;
[ 13 Boring Depth (ft) [ 11 P-cown>
15 < Recovery
Location Notes
Interval
(Depth)
Recovery
Description of M8t©rl3ls 1 SsmpiG ID PID
Munsefi Color; Moisture; Density; Consistency (Other Remarks) Sample Interval (pprnj
uses
Code
r ct «.£>; 1
¦ ¦ ' •' , ¦.
-S" JlAjto
Mi
h *<:¦
KX> v>k. Mrv
;'~3D"50 f
1
.
tr Dt)a
'
'¦ -
"
J5 ^ *
¦
¦
r4,»
¦¦
H c&fcq. kryv-Shi-t, w»'-0isiWt
a n 1
i'
-------
UrHOLOGIC LOG
Spihnpnt Cn!l?rt,on Lea
£4 En-jin^uno S.u^nre, & rechnc>!cg) inc PteC
Che^i I «nJ f-Yojxt Name
:>wn
Locatfon,'Boring Name
HT1 fi- ^3 ^
Sheet
of
t Gf-olngiht Nafn«'St,jna'.ii"j
5 Pm;i Mu>-nijer
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Date/T line Collects
Date/Time Processed
2 Dril'ing bubcont'acto: Equipment Operate
La;itusfe'Northing/C;nd
3 Seel Surface Eitvalior
i0 CoorctiiHte System
H f , V
! 1 Depth ct Water, ft (start/end)
3 Operator Name (License # If Renutred)
7 Longitude/Easting/Grid
VV*M*her ri,r!r condition;; wind diicationi
.^iinaVi'CIOiioy/Rdin
Sampling Equipment and Methodology iC.heck One)
Rotosonic; -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: . '¦ -ft barrel -in diameter Manual Puch/Vibi acote, Sonc.
Grab Sample: -it x -ft x -ft Box/Pcnar/Van Veen/Othei
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boring Depth (ft) !4 Rrf.'ovc»ry {ftt | 15 % Recovery
l C- Lection Notes
Interval
(Depth)
Recovery
Description of Materials
MunLoil Cnif
-------
LiTHOLQGIC LOG
Sediment Cc'lec-joi Log
EA tnginefrma, vifiv,'1 A 7 ec'jre- # It Peqmec<)
7 Longitucie/Easting/GnJ
12 •A/caHif I Temp arc e condition?, ''-in 1 duettionl
.-.'inpyCloiiJ'/ fte'P
4 Sampling Equipnen! and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic. -ft barrel -in diameter
Core. -ft Dart el -in diameter Manual Pusn/Vibracore/?>anic
Grab Sample: -ft. x -ft x
Other
13 Boung Depth ;'ti t (•« Rccovfc-y ifti 15 "Vi Recovery
-ft Box/Ponar/Van Veen/Other
Sample Collection Meihon
16 Location Notes
Interval
(Depth)
Recovery
Description of Materials
Muns.'ilCcN bncily ¦ i-twiVj i>j;h iFutli,
Sample ID P1D
Sample interval (ppm)
uses
Code
' ¦ ' .
-------
LI I HOLOGIC LOG
pedant nl C olfaction LOa
K 1 rit^met.nnij S«to-)ic<- C, Ttcl'fobc;,- i-ic PhC
Civ-rit Home and Project Nanus
Location,'Boring Name
Sheet
of
Get'ogk"1 Naine/Srjnatuib
Project N
CORE COLLECTION INFO
? Date/Time Collected Date/Time Processed
Drilling Subcontract®(•rqiupniem Opeiator
0 Latitude Northing/Grid
lJ 5eo Minate Elevation
10 Coordinate System H vut , v »,
r' Depth of Water ft tstai/end)
3 Operator Name (Liofnse » rf ifequg Depth if*) j 13 Recover(ft/ '5 % Recovery
in diameter Manual PusnA/ibracore. Sonic
ft x -ft Box/Ponar/Van Veen/Other
16 Location Noles
Sample Collection Method"
Interval
(Deptfil
Recovery
(ft & %)
Description of Materials
f^Mtscll Crilnr Moi3!t!to. I>:n3t.} Air^jslecin |OPih rf .
Sample ID PID
Sample Interval ! (ppm)
uses
Code
• , - ¦
-------
LITHOIGGIC LU'i
nmrnt CoHectiui L eg
EA Fno'fr-enng Scu-nr,? <$. 'ecvro/ngv 'n-z, PBC
eject Name
Locat.on/Bonng Name
HT16- 'jL ( ft
Sheet
. of •
Geologist M^mfei/Sigrdturc
piosea Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
Dale-1 im& Collected Date/Time Processed
iffmm
2 Dulling Subcoptiactor'Equipment GDeidtoi
6 Lalitude/Noitliiny'&rw
^urra'"-= tltv-'jor
n i iT-i xnalt- Sysfs-r"
*1 tvpth ifV attr f'
-i Operator Name (License # It Reqaireo}
Lu'iyifij>1e;fa.?liiigi'C-rii)
I? Weather (Temp, cirr'c- iWiiXl direitKMi)
Sunny/ClouclVRan
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check Ortej
Rolosonic -ft banei -in diameter
Core ' -ft bairel j -in Aainetei Manual Pusn/Viforacore-Some
Grab Sample -ft x -ft >. -ft
Other:
Soring Depth (f!)
1-j Rec-yery (frv
> Recovery
Box/PonarA/an Vaen'Ot^er
ocation Notes
Sample Collection Method:
Interval
iOspti~>
Recovery
>fti
Description of Materials Sample ID
Mmcpf O'ot MiPtwv D° i:,i> Cm:ri-~nc« i DihfrKFTFMti Sample Interval
PID
(ppril
uses
Code
. • ¦ '
CJ i —| 41 |
<
^ ( r
' ' ' 1
I
"V1"!''vf'T\1 Of i/jj j*\ %.. "**3 f y is iv - 1XV\ 1 1 \ a ^¦*
..
' ' /
-------
/"
#
s/W)
?:
-------
m
UTHOLOGiC LOG
HA Engineer,pg Sn&nre c ~t3TT'?T, ir:
•i"n \diifr a>id Project Name
LCCci.'M EC 11" ' \j~ i
1 Geologist Name'SinnatU'T
5 Froject Mi
:ORE COLLECTION INFC
6 DateTime Collected DateiTiqie Prccesso
2 Drilling Subcontractor Equ cr' ^ix-fatci
6 Latitucle/Northing/Grid
3 Operator Name (License # If Required)
7 Longitude/Easting/Grid
9 Si E'avdlson
lb Cu-Ildmai-G nHil H
11 D"P'n of i Vat a t! 'sVrtend)
12 V'eo'h^r Temp, cnde cirUnionb wina direction)
Sun \ ic'.icv'Rain
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One!
Rotosomci ___ -ft barrel ___ -in dtar
Core; -ft barrel
-------
jfggH LtTHOLOGiC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Etiqtn&ci'n-j Sconce, & 1 cchnoiogv, Inc , PBC
¦ 'tem Nifpe arid f itHO'1 Name
Locat'cnVBonng Name
hv
Sheet
1 of 1
1
Geologist Ndrrtnc {lut-ns? # lrPbqoiitKix
7 Lonqit'jdeiEastinq.'GiiJ
12 Weather (Temp, circle G.inditiom., ^vinti dnection)
Sunny'Cloudv'Rain
4
Sampling Eou.pment and Methcaologv (Ch»c* 0'iei
13
Goring Depth
-------
L'THOlOGIC log
Secit, nent Collection Log
EA Engineering. Scvrica. f 7 eclmolcy] inc. pBC
1 Geologist Name/Signature
I lent itenw and F rojact Name
Project N
Lot 3»1>'I|'BU,IPJ Ne-ni.
Sheet
of
CORF COLLECTION INFO
b Date/Time Collected Daie/Time Processed
2 Dniii;^ Subcontuictopl-quipment Operator
h Latilude/Moithinu/Giid
8 S-d Surface Elevaton
I0 i^ooidinate 6vsfcm> H
1.5 Operator)
cei tsi P It Re^wredj
7 Longitude'EaulpngK-jrid
Sampling tqiBpitet"1'. "incl Methodology tCnes^ Cnei
Rofosonic* -ft barrel -in diameter
-in diametei M^iiaal Pjsh/Vibracore4§onic
-ft barrel
•ft >'
Co.e __
Grab Sample
Other
Sample Collection Method:
11 Depth of Wat'ji rt (Sta"iencl)
I? VWalhf (Trfmo circle conditions <\md direction*
S>inny/Cloucly'Rain
13 Boring Depth (ft)
14 Reccweiy (*t\
15 % Recovery
-ft;
-ft Bu\/Poii Veer/CUhei
! 1C Location Notes
Interval
(Deptn)
Recovery J
(ft a %)
Description of Materials , Sample ID FID
Mnnseh C>'MOf Mutsw i>try.. 1 c"<5icFnry i Other Sample Interval {ppm>
uses |
Code |
V
¦
1 * , 1 .# ""1 f ~—
f f ^, ,
-------
UTHQLOtilC LOG
Sediment Collection Lug
EA EnomeennQ Science & Jechnoioay lire PBC
Client Name art* Project Njnie
Lnceifion/Boring Name
UT< ft. "i f I
Sheet
of
Geologist Uame'Ssgnatme
5 Fiuteci Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
5 OateTime Collected Date/Time Processed
2 Dulling Subcontracted ''Equipment Opei ator
latitude,'Northing. Ui ia
0 Ped Surface Elevalio'i
!i] C oardiridfe System H
'i 1 uepth or "v'ate;, *t (t-tart/endi
3 Operate Name {License # if Reunited)
i Longitude/Easbng/Gnd
ij. rnp "iiHi i nncirtions, wini din-'ctiorij
S. -nny Cloud/ Ruin
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check 0n<=|
Rotosonic -tf Dare! -iii diameter
Core ' -ft barrel -in diameter Manual Push/Vibraeore/Sonic
Grab Sample -ft y -ft x
Other
Sample Collection Method
jr,nn Depth srti I m Perovcv ("tj
15 v. Recovery
-ft Box/Ponar/Van Veen/Other
16 Location Notes
Interval
(Depth)
Recovery f Description of Marartals, ^ " " P* Sample ID ~ PID j USCS
| Mi u.sHI i 'nloi, MkiGIius- Densiif Corsincncy lOmer Rema.kd ! Sample Interval Ippm! | Code
SxW {ZDZx) HC
VjCmQ
VjiP '{Q .,j I TrOyY"). Z{J"fZ-^4 !
, ¦ ' ¦
- °UW.
m 1fldti . lil/rll-'YVM irr##/l
-
_ . ffl
V >
» ,d 11
\i\ps r&\\L?)^v fc» ^
c i s ^ / v> cA&m i
-------
lR HOlOGIC log
&<}dt:msat ColKrc'ton Log
EA tng-neei na n viiff ,1 "-'i.h.tt.iouv h'r i-fiC
Chen; Name and Fr,>io<:t Name
LocfuoniEsotinq Name
Sheet
of 1
1 Geologist Name,Kigtiatuic
5 Pioieot NurnUei
CORE COLLECTION INFO
t> Odte/Time Collected Date/Time Processed
2 Drilling S u boon tractor / Equi pmt'i n ODeratot
b 1. dtiiixIf Noi thina/Gnci
V Sad Surface Elevation
10 Coordinate System
H
11 Depth of Water ft is;oft>erxii
3 Cpeiator Name (License ft If Required*
7 Lc
12 Weathtsi (Temp, cmJe condition:., a'imU oiitji hir i
Si.niiv'Cloudv/Rain
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic. _____ -ft barrel -in diameter
Core ___ -ft barrel
Grab Sample. -ft x
Other
Sample Collection Method
13 Boring Depth (ft)
-in diameter Manual pusn<\/ib,'acoit>.t5onic
-ft x -ft Bo-'/Ponar/Van Veen/Other
Recovery "•"( io'l ;
i
|0
iozo
%y5 _,
¦; ' ¦'
¦
£ v\£Q[%| |-\C ctf'o/; Man r ~
"S" \
fCXj} "* !
oT (S kv
!C
3w^AjtolaCI^ wd\f Yy\j*V^to. BCccltj/ ^
i
-------
KO'JMC ! OG
Ccileeurn Log
t^"if?ffCO/ inc PBC
Client Nd'ru. and Protect Nana
Location/Boring Name Sheet
-i of +
1 O^obaisf Hdrnp.'SigncitUr'j
i 1 IJumbe.
CORE COLLECTION INFO
3 Date/Time Collected J Date/Time Processed
2 DiiMng SubcontractorvEqibprnent Operator
0 Latitude/Northing/Grid
3 Sed Su> face Elevation ft
10 Coordinate System H \ Jf-..t •,
11 Depth of Water, ft fstariA_-ncls
3 Operator Name (License # If Required)
7 Loriciitude'hail'tig/Grid
12 /veati^er (Temp c rcN- corHitiont wind iir-=»-hon)
Sunnvir,k>ik
-------
B* UTHOLOGIC LOG
Sc0ime,it Collector! Loq
£4 cDgiikfering. Scicrtct a Ttchncloav Inc FSC
Client Name and Project Name
Location/Boring Nanifi ] Sheet
i J 5 Of #
1 Geologist Nar.iti'Signat'ire
b Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
0 Datr.'Time Collected
'¦ »
Ddte/Ttme Processed
2 Drilling Subeontiactor/Equipment Ope>fatoi Njr-w 4 :>P--au,red)
7 Longrtude/Eas ting/Grid
1? Wcothci (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
Sunny/Cloudy/Rain
4 Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Cheel-One)
Rotosonic _____ -ft barrel -in diameter
Core , -ft barrel i
Grao Sample: -ft x
Other:
Sampie Collection Method,
Interval
(Death I
Recovery
(ft f, Jc)
13 Boiing Depth (ft; | 14 Recovery (ft)
in diameter Manual P-ish.A/ibraoore/Sonic
It x -ft BoxVPonar/Var, Veen,Other
15 % Recovery
Location Notes
Description of Materials
Mimsell Color Moisture. Ot-nwty. Consistency (Other Keinarb:
Sample ID i PID
Sample interval tppmI
uses
Code
if
-------
m
LITHOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Colhcuon Log
FA Enai"*cnnq 5r'fnic S "v f'bC
Clien* Nsifte ann Proiect Name
-oeatio.VBoimg Name
Sheet
of 1
1 Geologist Name, Sijnuii u
Flop:'.* Nurmbei
CORE COLLECTION INFO
'3 PjteiTtme Coflectei' DateTunc Processed
2 Drilling SufccontiactGiiEqi'ipmentOteratoi
Laotudt'NorthTg'Giiri
5cd -5ui"j:t Etesaliun
rooidinait System
H
Otpili cf Watei It (start/end)
3 Operator fJ^nt iLicanix.- # It Kemwt'Ol
Lonjitucie tasting/Grid
12 "VcathenTemp, rrcle comjttiom v hid direction^
c urhs^C't Lidv^nin
Sampling Equipment and Methodology iChe"-k Cifwi
Rotosonic -ft barrel -in diameter
Core , -ft barrel -in diameter Manual Pusb'Vibracore, Some
Grab Sample _____ -ft > 'I \ -ft Box/Ponar/Van Veen/Other
Other
Sampls Collection Method.
13 Sornns D-pth t'm
14 Recovery (ft)
IS \ Recovery
!6 Locahon Notes
Interval
iDepth)
Recovery
(fl £ Vi
Dpscriptioii of Materials j Sample !D
Wwr el vi ioi '¦ oi^liitf- De" "i CiTMs>enrvIf K—rp^s.~ 5} Sample interval
PiD
(ppm)
uses
Cede
' , ¦
•
•
1
-------
lis
LlfHOLOGiC LOG
Sec'/f v./' Collection Log
:A Enoine^nna S.iik"'; i\ ~>rch!rik,g* inc.. PBC
Client Mailt ana Project Name
Location Boiing Name
Sheet
of
1 Godoaist UairuSigrtdtuiw
5 nic|ect i'umber
CORE COLLECTION INFO
3 Date/T ime Collected
!
Dale/Time Processed
0 Sed Surface Elevation
ft
10 Coordinate System
H , \ ;¦ .
11 Depih of Water, ft istart/end)
2 Diiliing SubconliacturEituiumeiii Op*>i1
4 Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic: -ft barrel -in diameter
Core ' -ft barrel *-$
Grab Sample: -ft \
Other
Sample Collection Method
12 Wedtiier {Temp, circle (.onuiln)tii wil inaction
biirny.'iJcudyi'^j.ri
id Bo'ing Depth (ft) j 14 p-ro> -jty (ft) ; ir»ntnl I (t&%<
Description of Materials
Mtinsell C'.io*. Mmslwe l>;n:.i!y U'.'twuv .'Other -terart,.
Sample ID RID
Sample Interval (pprn)
uses
Code
^UbroUindjze!
io3d
Ciayqc
t. t\: ¦' ?'5. i, i'«
ri rAiAM
¦»
-------
m
IjrHOLOGiC LCG
,Sedink-fir r oils'. h~n Log
£$ Erg 'K cfng Sacnc" S ir>c cLl
CI tent Name and Proiec! Name
Locat'on'Boring Name
Sheet
1 of J
Geologist fJame/SignaUre
5 Prciert Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
6 Date/Time Collected Date/Time Processed
Drilling SubcorrtrartQr/Fquipmert Ope'atoi
Latitude/North ing/Gricl
Sed Surface Elevation
10 Coordinate System
V NAVD88
11 Depth of Watei ft istait/end)
3 Optjfdlor Namt (License 4 if Requited*
7 Longitude/Easting/Gnd
I ^ Wwatht- (Tfinp nnrir- rnndshons, winrt direction)
SunnwC'OMOf'Ram
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Cfieck One)
Rotosonic _____ -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: ' .v -ft barrel -in diameter Manual Push/V'ibracor&Soni'
Grab Sample: -ft x -ft x
Other:
Sample Collection Method*
1 i Boring Depth ! Ft! lA R^cove>y ittll 15 % Recovery
-ft Box/Ponar/Van Veen/Other
16 Location Notes
Interval Recovery
(Depth) t (ff <&-'«!
Description of Materials
Wunsel. Git > Mniruie Lenity, Coiiai-Jf-rci (Ottw ^i-vm
Sample ID
Sample Interval
PID
town)
uses
Code
-------
¦¦¦:»¦ V ¦, r
i
m
EA
LITHOIOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
Engineering, Science, & Technolcxn Inc PBC
Ciieril Harm and Project Name
' f1 ' , '
I ucation/Bonng Name
1
oheot
of 1
1
Geologist Name/Signature
0 Pioiect Number
CORfc COLLECTION INFO
1
-ClfE
L\>
l1-.' 1
8 Start Date/rime <,ci
wHv-,
?¦(> >' * > - < Vi
i
X
Core:
,/V ,V -ft barrel
* * 'i
, -in diameter Manual Pusji/Vibrttcore ¦
I' :l
/ i
¦¦
_
Grab Sample
Other:
-ft X
_ -ft X
,» \
-ft Box/Ponar/Van Veen/Other
16
Lcication Notes
Sample Collection Method:
Interval
(Depth)
Recovery
(ft & %)
Description of Materials
Muriel Cnlor Mciotu'fc D^itv rnn^^niv M ht-i Hi n nrkoi
Sample ID
Sample Interval
FID
(ppm)
uses
9
* ' :
y :
1
'
i. ' €l ' ¦' '
i '
1 !
;vi'i' ;
TrS - ^
k, ;
1
\ y* {*
(-} ' J
J o ?
;; , j
\
¦ \
/ -t- 1 L l-ll1
vA-
¦J
¦ • ¦" ¦ "¦ -;r
- ~ - - l! 4
> i '
.
. ' V
> M V;
i i - 1 \ j
•''xv. vt))
i "»¦ • s
i. i •
, " V . 1
i j
1 i
.:•! t >¦ ... «
/- * ^ '.N,
, i
PA Ct
\ ¦ iX "
ptCw-
1 M f ^
\ ^ s \ I V j1 ) \fl
/ ; ¦' i>.
' V \
v-vV, ,
i
>'V ""'h;i
I
- 1 ( i i \ \ i I
! < ' V - ^ s V \ ' 1- . ' 1
y.
11
-------
LITHOLOG1C LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology, Inc., PBC
Client Name and Project Name
Location/Boring Name
Sheet
1 Of 1
1
Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION
8 Date/Time Collected
. i ... .
' V • < ' 1
Date/Tim# Processed
2
Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator,
6 Latitude/Northing/Grid
§ Sed Surface Elevation
(t
10 Coordinate System
H
V
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
3
Operator Name (License # If Required)
7 Longltude/Easting/Grid
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
Sunny/Cioudy/Rain
4
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
13 Boring Depth (ft)
14 Recovery (ft)
15 % Recov
Rotosontc: ,, ' -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: -ft barrel -in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
Grab Sample: -ft x -ft x
-ft Box/Ponar/Van Veen/Other
16 Location Notes
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
Interval
(Depth)
Recovery
Description of Materials
Munsell Color; Moisture; Density. Consistency (Other Remarks)
Sample ID PID
Sample Interval (ppm)
uses
Code
u»\
i-Ka
•ff ^fCUf-
£**( •
|x"" "hii |
* , 't
10 I
J4- ' i I
_
(
Ci"
l (M j
AA
jV fcA$CVl
lfov€
-------
UTHOLOGfC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology, Inc, PBC
Client Name and Project Name
Location/Boring Name
Sheet
1 of I
1 Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Date/Time Collected Date/Time Processed
! i i
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment. Operator
6 Latitude/Northing/Grid
Sed Surface Elevation
10 Coordinate System
V 1
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
3 Operator Name (license # If Required)
7 Longitude/Easting/Grid
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
Sunny/Cloudy/Rain
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic; ji -ft barrel _____ -in diameter
Core: -ft barrel
Grab Sample: -ft x
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boring Depth (ft) 14 Recovery (ft) 15% Recovery
in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
¦ft x -ft Box/Ponar/Van Veen/Other
16 Location Notes
Interval
(Depth)
Recovery
(ft & %)
Description of Materials
Murtseli Colon Moisture, Density; Consistency (Other Remarks)
Sample ID
Sample Interval
PID
(ppm)
uses
Code
IjUi, 11 . I
LA ft-1 cXW I tor '"l
jx<04
gw>» j i wot j
h 6~{ t">"' c '
IttiUS iO
-------
U.S. EPA Great Lakes National Program Office
Locations! Data Checklist and Metadata Recording Form
This document accompanies GLNPO's Great Lakes Legacy Act Data Reporting Standard, Version 1.0, March 2010, which provides detailed dots reporting
guidance for project data including required electronic data deliverables (EDD). tn addition to the EDO and project field forms, project participants are
required to complete this checklist at the end of each sampling event Copies of completed forms should be submitted to the GLNPO Project Lead.
Contact information
Contact Name:
Affiliation:
Study Information
Project Title:
Site Name:
Sampling Start Date:
TA
1 X Ac' V \v"v"\f'X y \
yy ,
Phone Number:
E-mail Address:
I Jf i' \ '»" It i V '
1 f''\
LpXU \ -i t '< ¦ >
I-lit torVQuty-x
l'VV\ru.V»i _k,Y~\
JMJi
4i
Sampling Stop Date: I C
Preparation Activities (please confirm each activity in the boxes to the right)
1. Sampling staff are trained in GPS Field Data Collection and have familiarized themselves with the GPS
unit used for this project (certified training recommended).
si.
2. Determined window of satellite availability, http://www.trimble.com/planningsoftware_ts.asp
3. Established at least two control points for both vertical and horizontal accuracy.
For assistance locating control points visit http://www.ngs,noaa.gov/cgi-bin/datasheetprl or
http://www.geocaching.com/mark/. This may not be feasible if the GPS unit is mounted to a vessel.
4. Located 3 reference points. *
~7"
Data Collection Activities (please confirm each activity in the boxes to the right)
1. GPS unit was configured to collect data only when the following requirements were met:
a. A minimum of four satellites
b. Position dilution of precision (PD0P)<=6
c. Satellite elevation >=15" above the horizon
d. A minimum signai-to-noise ratio (refer to GPS user manual for recommendation)
2. Collected point data based on the nearest base station's logging interval. j |
3. Collected point data for a period of at leastjjninute per location. j " ,y7"" \
4. Reported locational data in WGS 84 o/nAD 83 jpleass specify 1 I [ ~S~\
Please provide an explanation if a box was not checked for any of the responses above and specify deviations (include sample IDs ff applicable):
•Collect these points on at least the first day of sampling. Collecting on each sampling day is recommended. Record on page 2.
GPS Unit Specifications
GPS Brand and model number
Model accuracy:
Data Processing
Which of the following best describes any data correction that may have been performed:
[T-j real-time correction - specify type j |post processed differential correction - provide base station id and location
¦:iUuvA\-'
| |no correction [ [other, please specify
Quality Information
Describe any difficulties in collecting locational data:
A t I v * r>v7- ios>"( ^
*\'\
List final post-processed accuracy of the data:
Data Collector:
Confirm required information has been provided.
Signature Date
GLNPO Project lead:
Confirm required information has been provided.
Signature Date
li i EPA Great Lakes National Program Office
March *010
-------
U.S. EPA Great Lakes National Program Office
GPS Daily Check
Collect these data on at least the first day of sampling. Collecting on each sampling day is recommended.
Project Title:
Date:
lUyvl vVU'itn--..Av-)
JXjJJLtiJ
Horizontal Control Point 1
Benchmark ID: .>f~t VI r*IV> ('l'\l s't.
Time:
"~lo
Li
w-ib
Established Latitude:
Established Longitude- I IP/j . I i \
Measured Latitude:
Measured Longitude:
> -b j1 f J, < a
Displacement (include UOM): Y ' U ¦ C'~~ ^ .X " L'< '¦ M \
Horizontal Control Point 2
Benchmark ID: VP'A fl'lV
Established Latitude: K j {j OH \
Established Longitude: i i I.: f 'j VS 1 >' .>V<
Time:
Measured Latitude: J' ) \ 11 r / v \-J ' I
Measured
Displacement (include UOM): Y C- Q.\4 ^ \ 0 . 0 i' { .
Vertical Control Point 1
Longitude: l"jl I L" 1 / C,. Vn
Benchmark ID:
Established Elevation:
Displacement (include UOM):
Time:
) C
i Vt
Measured Elevation:
Vertical Control Point 2
Benchmark ID: T-V.pT VUHftV/C t Time: -| '711
Established Elevation: -\l\( ¦ 'J | ( \
Displacement (include UOM):
Measured Elevation:
-&n~SO*
•^"Bu. cV'-^i
Jr
_\ <•"
Reference Point 1
Time:
Physical/Locational description:
Measured Latitude: __
NH*p\\W < i\ix i vC
_____ n' /v\
Kj \ i\ \
<¦' &K< \
Measured longitude:
Reference Point 2
Time:
Physical/Locational description:
Measured Latitude:
Measured longitude:
Reference Point 3
Time:
Physical/Locational description:
Measured Latitude: _____
Measured Longitude:
U.S. EPA Great Lakes National Program Office
March 2010
-------
U.S. EPA Great Lakes National Program Office
GPS Daily Check
Collect these data on at least the first day of sampling. Collecting on each sampling day Is recommended.
Project Title:
Date:
TV.)C-III
tOlik
Horizontal Control Point 1
Benchmark ID: -ST v>'\1 tV * VU iL
Time:
V
Established Latitude:
Established Longitude:
-•» j
Measured Latitude; j />' * 1
, l'
-------
Appendix B
Lithologic Core Logs
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Harbortown
SEDIMENT BORING HT16-01
DATE COLLECTED 6/15/2016 10:00:00 AM
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.28
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
DATE LOGGED 6/15/2016 3:30:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cascade Drilling
NORTHING* 309746.88
EASTING* 13494549.48
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
ELEVATION 552.2 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 94%
CO LU
UJ =3
Q 2
<
>
(Z
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
o
o
_l
0
X
CL
<
01
a
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
Composite
HT16-01-0010
CL-ML
SILTY CLAY: dark gray clayey silt, trace organics.
29
Composite
HT16-01-1030
CH
CLAY: stiff gray clay. Red mottling/clay lenses at
6-8'.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
Each core sample was collected in 5-ft core liner sections.
NAPL = non-aqueous phase liquid
End of Boring at 10 ft.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
J EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Harbortown
SEDIMENT BORING HT16-02
DATE COLLECTED 6/7/2016 4:00:00 PM
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.28
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
DATE LOGGED 6/9/2016 4:15:00 PM
NORTHING* 308438.32
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cascade Drilling
EASTING* 13492778.51
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
ELEVATION 566.5 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 65.5%
CO LU
UJ =3
Q 2
<
>
(Z
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
o
o
_l
0
X
CL
<
01
a
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
12
12
Composite
Composite
HT16-02-0010
HT16-02-1020
MH
CL-ML
SILT: dark gray silt with little vf sand.
SILTY CLAY: dark gray silty clay, rootlets visible.
12
Composite
HT16-02-2030
CL
CLAY: gray clay, semi-soft.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
Each core sample was collected in 5-ft core liner sections.
NAPL = non-aqueous phase liquid
PAGE 1 of 2
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Harbortown
SEDIMENT BORING HT16-02
DATE COLLECTED 6/7/2016 4:00:00 PM
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.28
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
DATE LOGGED 6/9/2016 4:15:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cascade Drilling
NORTHING* 308438.32
EASTING* 13492778.51
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
ELEVATION 566.5 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 65.5%
CO LU
UJ =3
Q 2
<
>
(Z
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
o
o
_l
0
X
CL
<
01
a
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
CL
CLAY: gray semi-soft clay, golf ball at top of core
liner section.
SC-CL
SANDY CLAY: gray sandy clay.
SW
SAND: c-m sand, some well-rounded pebbles to
cobbles, little clay.
CH
CLAY: gray semi-stiff clay with red varving/red clay
lenses. Some f gravel.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
Each core sample was collected in 5-ft core liner sections.
NAPL = non-aqueous phase liquid
End of Boring at 20 ft.
PAGE 2 of 2
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Harbortown
SEDIMENT BORING HT16-03
DATE COLLECTED 6/8/2016 12:15:00 PM
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.28
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
DATE LOGGED 6/9/2016 12:15:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cascade Drilling
NORTHING* 307495.24
EASTING* 13491827.32
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
ELEVATION 566.4 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 100%
CO LU
UJ =3
Q 2
<
>
(Z
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Harbortown
SEDIMENT BORING HT16-04
DATE COLLECTED 6/8/2016 1:50:00 PM
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.28
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
DATE LOGGED 6/10/2016 9:30:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cascade Drilling
NORTHING* 306720.34
EASTING* 13491045.15
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
ELEVATION 564.8 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 100%
CO LU
UJ =3
Q 2
<
>
(Z
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
o
o
_l
g
n
CL
<
en
o
CO
CO
<
—I
o
CO
o
CO
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
12
Composite
HT16-04-0010
CH
CLAY: gray stiff clay. Some f-m sand. Trace orange
staining and nodules, trace well-rounded gravel to
pebbles.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
Each core sample was collected in 5-ft core liner sections.
NAPL = non-aqueous phase liquid
End of Boring at 10 ft.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Harbortown
SEDIMENT BORING HT16-05
DATE COLLECTED 6/14/2016 2:25:00 PM
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.28
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
DATE LOGGED 6/15/2016 11:20:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cascade Drilling
NORTHING* 310290.17
EASTING* 13492133.51
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
ELEVATION 551.3 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 95%
CO LU
UJ =3
Q 2
<
>
(Z
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
o
o
_l
0
X
CL
<
01
a
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
Composite
HT16-05-0010
11
Composite
HT16-05-1020
ML
SANDY SILT: black fine sandy silt and organic
material; hydrocarbon and sour odor, likely CSO
material.
CH
CLAY: gray stiff clay with some angular gravel;
lenses of gray sandy silt with hydrocarbon odor.
29
Composite
HT16-05-2040
CH
CLAY: gray stiff clay, trace angular gravel.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
Each core sample was collected in 5-ft core liner sections.
NAPL = non-aqueous phase liquid
End of Boring at 10 ft.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Harbortown
SEDIMENT BORING HT16-06
DATE COLLECTED 6/14/2016 1:15:00 PM
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.28
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
DATE LOGGED 6/15/2016 4:00:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cascade Drilling
NORTHING* 310037.68
EASTING* 13492009
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
ELEVATION 548.5 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 100%
CO LU
UJ =3
Q 2
<
>
(Z
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
o
o
_l
0
X
CL
<
01
a
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
SC-CL
SANDY CLAY: black m-f sand in gray day.
12
Composite
HT16-06-0010
BOULDER
24
Composite
HT16-06-1030
CH
CLAY: gray stiff to semistiff clay. Red clay lenses at
6-8'.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
Each core sample was collected in 5-ft core liner sections.
NAPL = non-aqueous phase liquid
End of Boring at 10 ft.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Harbortown
SEDIMENT BORING HT16-07
DATE COLLECTED 6/14/2016 12:30:00 PM
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.28
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
DATE LOGGED 6/15/2016 10:00:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cascade Drilling
NORTHING* 309634.67
EASTING* 13491435.2
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
ELEVATION 554.1 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 100%
CO LU
HI 3
Q S
<
>
01
12
16
20
24
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
HT16-07-0010
HT16-07-1025
HT16-07-2540
HT16-07-4060
CH
CH
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
GW SILTY GRAVEL: black silty gravel, strong
hydrocarbon odor, some glass pieces, pebbles, and
cobbles.
WHITE/BLUE CHALKY MATERIAL: white/light blue
material, feels like saturated chalk; pH=13; strong
chemical odor, remiscent of Solvay waste. NAPL
present in bands.
GRAVEL AND NAPL: black sticky gravel/clay
interface: NAPL present.
CLAY: gray semistiff clay.
NAPL: band of NAPL.
CH CLAY: gray stiff clay with some angular gravel and c
sand.
NAPL: band of NAPL; PIP reading: 153 ppm
CLAY: gray stiff clay, trace angular gravel and c
sand.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
Each core sample was collected in 5-ft core liner sections.
NAPL = non-aqueous phase liquid
End of Boring at 10 ft.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Harbortown
SEDIMENT BORING HT16-08
DATE COLLECTED 6/13/2016 4:05:00 PM
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.28
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
DATE LOGGED 6/14/2016 9:30:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cascade Drilling
NORTHING* 308994.96
EASTING* 13490710.15
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
ELEVATION 550.4 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 100%
CO LU
UJ =3
Q 2
<
>
(Z
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
o
o
_l
0
X
CL
<
01
a
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
12
Composite
HT16-08-0010
24
Composite
HT16-08-1030
CH
CLAY: gray stiff clay, some f sand, trace angular
gravel.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
Each core sample was collected in 5-ft core liner sections.
NAPL = non-aqueous phase liquid
End of Boring at 10 ft.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Harbortown
SEDIMENT BORING HT16-09
DATE COLLECTED 6/13/2016 3:10:00 PM
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.28
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
DATE LOGGED 6/14/2016 1:00:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cascade Drilling
NORTHING* 308851.25
EASTING* 13490582.38
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
ELEVATION 552.5 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 100%
CO LU
UJ =3
Q 2
<
>
(Z
28
Composite
Composite
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
HT16-09-0010
o
o
_l
g
n
CL
<
en
o
'///////A
HT16-09-1030
CO
CO
<
_l
o
CO
o
CO
CH
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
GRAVEL: black c sand to f gravel, little clay, trace
pebbles.
CLAY: gray fat day.
CLAYEY SAND: clayey sand with woody debris, faint
hydrocarbon odor, trace pebbles.
CLAY: semi stiff to stiff gray clay. Red lenses ~1 /4"
across, little sand/subangular gravel.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
Each core sample was collected in 5-ft core liner sections.
NAPL = non-aqueous phase liquid
End of Boring at 10 ft.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Harbortown
SEDIMENT BORING HT16-10
DATE COLLECTED 6/13/2016 2:20:00 PM
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.28
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
DATE LOGGED 6/14/2016 9:45:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cascade Drilling
NORTHING* 308715.5
EASTING* 13490356.11
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
ELEVATION 555.7 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 100%
CO LU
HI 3
Q S
<
>
01
12
24
Composite
Composite
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
HT16-10-0010
HT16-10-1030
CD
O
_l
g
n
CL
<
en
o
CO
CO
<
—I
o
CO
o
CO
GW
CH
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
PEBBLES/COBBLES: pebbles/cobbles with little c
sand, hydrocarbon odor.
CLAY: gray stiff to semistiff clay. Little angular
gravel.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
Each core sample was collected in 5-ft core liner sections.
NAPL = non-aqueous phase liquid
End of Boring at 10 ft.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Harbortown
SEDIMENT BORING HT16-11
DATE COLLECTED 6/10/2016 2:10:00 PM
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.28
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
DATE LOGGED 6/13/2016 10:45:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cascade Drilling
NORTHING* 308508.54
EASTING* 13490201.57
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
ELEVATION 557.2 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 100%
CO LU
UJ =3
Q 2
<
>
(Z
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
o
o
_l
0
X
CL
<
01
a
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
12
16
Composite
Composite
Composite
HT16-11-0010
HT16-11-1015
HT16-11-1530
SC-CL
SANDY CLAY: black sandy clay, sand f-m. Trace
wood debris, strong hydrocarbon odor.
CH
CLAY: gray stiff clay, little cobbles/boulders. Red
clay lenses and mottlying at 5-7'.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
Each core sample was collected in 5-ft core liner sections.
NAPL = non-aqueous phase liquid
End of Boring at 10 ft.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Harbortown
SEDIMENT BORING HT16-12
DATE COLLECTED 6/14/2016 9:05:00 AM
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.28
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
DATE LOGGED 6/15/2016 9:30:00 AM
NORTHING* 308396.29
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cascade Drilling
EASTING* 13489929.02
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
ELEVATION 562.9 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 79%
CO LU
UJ =3
Q 2
<
>
(Z
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
o
o
_l
0
X
CL
<
01
a
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
12
14
Composite
Composite
HT16-12-0010
HT16-12-1020
CL-ML
CL
SILTY CLAY: gray/brown silty clay, hydrocarbon
odor.
CLAY: dark gray soft clay and fibrous woody debris,
hydrocarbon odor.
CL
CLAY: band of light gray soft clay, possible trace of
NAPL.
SC-CL
SANDY CLAY: m sand in silty clay, water visible.
Hydrocarbon odor.
CH
16
Composite
HT16-12-2035
CLAY: gray soft clay, hydrocarbon odor.
SC
CLAYEY SAND: gray clayey sand, hydrocarbon odor.
18
Composite
HT16-12-3550
CH
CLAY: gray stiff clay.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
Each core sample was collected in 5-ft core liner sections.
NAPL = non-aqueous phase liquid
End of Boring at 10 ft.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Harbortown
SEDIMENT BORING HT16-13
DATE COLLECTED 6/13/2016 1:20:00 PM
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.28
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
DATE LOGGED 6/14/2016 2:30:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cascade Drilling
NORTHING* 308041.74
EASTING* 13489459.79
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
ELEVATION 564.0 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 70%
CO LU
UJ =3
Q 2
<
>
(Z
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
o
o
_l
g
n
CL
<
en
o
CO
CO
<
—I
o
CO
o
CO
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
12
Composite
HT16-13-0010
ML
CL-ML
SC-CL
SILT: gray silt, little vf sand.
vegetation present, 6" tall.
Submerged aquatic
SILTY CLAY: dark gray silty clay, little vf sand,
hydrocarbon odor.
SANDY CLAY: black silty clay and vf sand.
28
Composite
HT16-13-1030
SM
SILTY SAND: brown silty m-c sand, some
boulders/cobbles.
20
Composite
HT16-13-3050
CH
CLAY: gray stiff clay, some m sand and angular
gravel, red clay lenses at 5-7'.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
Each core sample was collected in 5-ft core liner sections.
NAPL = non-aqueous phase liquid
End of Boring at 10 ft.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Harbortown
SEDIMENT BORING HT16-14
DATE COLLECTED 6/13/2016 12:45:00 PM
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.28
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
DATELOGGED 6/14/2016 11:15:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cascade Drilling
NORTHING* 307785.89
EASTING* 13489439.29
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
ELEVATION 553.2 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 100%
CO LU
UJ =3
Q 2
<
>
(Z
27
Composite
Composite
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
HT16-14-0010
HT16-14-1030
o
o
_l
g
n
CL
<
en
o
CO
CO
<
—I
o
CO
o
CO
GW
CH
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
GRAVEL: black gravel, some cobbles/boulders, little
f-m sand, hydrocarbon odor.
CLAY: gray semi stiff to stiff clay, trace sand and
angular gravel. Red clay lenses at 5-7'.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
Each core sample was collected in 5-ft core liner sections.
NAPL = non-aqueous phase liquid
End of Boring at 10 ft.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Harbortown
SEDIMENT BORING HT16-15
DATE COLLECTED 6/13/2016 11:50:00 AM
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.28
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
DATE LOGGED 6/14/2016 10:30:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cascade Drilling
NORTHING* 307505.97
EASTING* 13488637.25
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
ELEVATION 557.2 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 93%
CO LU
UJ =3
Q 2
<
>
(Z
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
o
o
_l
0
X
CL
<
01
a
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
Composite
HT16-15-0010
28
Composite
HT16-15-1030
SILT: dark gray silt with trace vf sand, hydrocarbon
odor.
SANDY CLAY: black sandy clay, little organic
material, whole mussel shell 3" across, little pebbles
and cobbles. Hydrocarbon odor.
CH
CLAY: stiff to semistiff gray clay, little angular gravel
and c sand.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
Each core sample was collected in 5-ft core liner sections.
NAPL = non-aqueous phase liquid
End of Boring at 10 ft.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Harbortown
SEDIMENT BORING HT16-16
DATE COLLECTED 6/10/2016 12:15:00 PM
DATE LOGGED 6/12/2016 11:00:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cascade Drilling
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.28
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
NORTHING* 307097.3
EASTING* 13487894.54
ELEVATION 557.3 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 90%
CO LU
UJ =3
Q 2
<
>
(Z
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
o
o
_l
0
X
CL
<
01
a
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
12
Composite
HT16-16-0010
24
Composite
HT16-16-1030
30
Composite
HT16-16-3055
18
Composite
HT16-16-5570
SW
SAND: black m-c sand, some semi-angular gravel,
trace shell fragments, hydrocarbon odor.
SP
SAND: gray f-m sand, trace wood debris and shell
fragments.
SC
CLAYEY SAND: black f sand with some clay, trace
rounded gravel, brick chunk.
SP
SC
SAND: gray f-m sand, trace f gravel.
CLAYEY SAND: black f-m sand with some silty clay.
Wood chunk 1"x3" long @ 3.2-3.3'
SC
CLAYEY SAND: black f-m sand with some silty clay.
NAPL present. Liner was weakened by product,
broke in half and could be peeled off due to fractures
and thinning.
CH
CLAY: gray stiff clay. Drawdown on outside of core
to 7'. Tried to take sample from middle of core to
preserve representativeness.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
Each core sample was collected in 5-ft core liner sections.
NAPL = non-aqueous phase liquid
End of Boring at 10 ft.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Harbortown
SEDIMENT BORING HT16-17
DATE COLLECTED 6/13/2016 11:10:00 AM
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.28
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
DATE LOGGED 6/14/2016 3:00:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cascade Drilling
NORTHING* 307096.53
EASTING* 13487810.32
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
ELEVATION 560.1 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 85%
CO LU
UJ =3
Q 2
<
>
(Z
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
o
o
_l
0
X
CL
<
01
a
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
18
Composite
HT16-17-1015
ML
SM
SILT: brown/gray silt with vf sand.
SAND: gray f sand, trace silty clay, hydrocarbon odor.
SW
SAND: brown well-graded sand, trace gravel.
15
Composite
HT16-17-1530
CLAY: light gray fat day.
CLAY: soft black clay, little f sand, trace organics.
Hydrocarbon odor.
CLAY: light gray fat day, wood pieces.
CLAYEY SAND: black clayey sand, little wood debris.
Hydrocarbon odor.
27
Composite
HT16-17-3050
CH
CLAY: fat gray clay, semistiff to stiff, trace angular
gravel, little red clay lenses.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
Each core sample was collected in 5-ft core liner sections.
NAPL = non-aqueous phase liquid
End of Boring at 10 ft.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
J EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Harbortown
SEDIMENT BORING HT16-18B
DATE COLLECTED 6/14/2016 11:00:00 AM
DATE LOGGED 6/15/2016 12:30:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cascade Drilling
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.28
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
NORTHING* 307112.08
EASTING* 13487935.58
ELEVATION 559.3 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 63%
CO LU
HI 3
Q S
<
>
01
14
26
17
18
Composite
Composite
Composite
Composite
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
HT16-18B-0010
; 4*^; 4*<
'• i]
; 4*^' 4*
I L
HT16-18B-1030
HT16-18B-3050
HT16-18B-5070
CD
O
_i
0
X
CL
<
01
a
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
GW
SC-CL
CL-ML
SM
CH
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
GRAVEL AND SAND: f gravel and c sand, little
pebbles, trace clay.
SANDY CLAY: black sandy clay, little organics
(wood), strong hydrocarbon odor.
SILTY CLAY: black silty clay, some organics, strong
hydrocarbon odor.
SILTY SAND: black silty f sand and gravel/sand, little
cobbles. NAPL present.
CLAY: gray semistiff clay.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
Each core sample was collected in 5-ft core liner sections.
NAPL = non-aqueous phase liquid
End of Boring at 10 ft.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Harbortown
SEDIMENT BORING HT16-18C
DATE COLLECTED 6/14/2016 11:25:00 AM
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.28
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
DATE LOGGED 6/15/2016 1:00:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cascade Drilling
NORTHING* 307096.73
EASTING* 13487932.95
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
ELEVATION 556.8 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 63%
CO LU
UJ =3
Q 2
<
>
(Z
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
o
o
_l
0
X
CL
<
01
a
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
12
Composite
HT16-18C-0010
SM
SILTY SAND: black f sand with little silty clay, strong
hydrocarbon odor.
SW
19
Composite
HT16-18C-1025
SAND: well-graded c sand with rounded gravel,
strong hydrocarbon odor.
SM
SW
SILTY SAND: black f sand with little silty clay, strong
hydrocarbon odor.
SAND: m black sand with NAPL, little cobbles and
boulders. Core liner beginning to thin.
17
Composite
HT16-18C-2540
CH
CLAY: gray stiff clay, trace angular gravel. Red clay
lenses.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
Each core sample was collected in 5-ft core liner sections.
NAPL = non-aqueous phase liquid
End of Boring at 10 ft.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Harbortown
SEDIMENT BORING HT16-19
DATE COLLECTED 6/13/2016 9:35:00 AM
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.28
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
DATE LOGGED 6/14/2016 1:35:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cascade Drilling
NORTHING* 307189.68
EASTING* 13487667.84
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
ELEVATION 567.0 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 98%
CO LU
UJ =3
Q 2
<
>
(Z
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
o
o
_l
0
X
CL
<
01
a
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
12
Composite
HT16-19-0010
24
Composite
HT16-19-1030
23
Composite
HT16-19-3050
CL-ML
CL
CL-ML
SILTY CLAY: dark gray/black silty clay, some organic
material, hydrocarbon odor.
WHITE/BLUE CHALKY MATERIAL: white/light blue
material, feels like saturated chalk; strong chemical
odor, remiscent of Solvay waste. Slag present
immediately underneath it.
SILTY CLAY: dark gray/black silty clay, some organic
material, hydrocarbon odor.
25
Composite
HT16-19-5070
CH
CLAY: gray fat clay, semi-stiff, trace semi-angular
gravel.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
Each core sample was collected in 5-ft core liner sections.
NAPL = non-aqueous phase liquid
End of Boring at 10 ft.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Harbortown
SEDIMENT BORING HT16-20
DATE COLLECTED 6/13/2016 10:10:00 AM
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.28
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
DATE LOGGED 6/14/2016 8:40:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cascade Drilling
NORTHING* 307084.07
EASTING* 13487728.96
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
ELEVATION 563.5 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 75%
CO LU
UJ =3
Q 2
<
>
(Z
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Harbortown
SEDIMENT BORING HT16-21
DATE COLLECTED 6/10/2016 11:15:00 AM
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.28
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
DATE LOGGED 6/13/2016 12:00:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cascade Drilling
NORTHING* 306943.28
EASTING* 13487617.88
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
ELEVATION 547.7 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 100%
CO LU
UJ =3
Q 2
<
>
(Z
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
o
o
_l
0
X
CL
<
01
a
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
Composite
HT16-21-0010
28
Composite
HT16-21-1030
CL
CLAY: soft gray clay, little rounded gravel/pebbles,
lens of black sand.
CH
CLAY: stiff gray clay, little subangular gravel.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
Each core sample was collected in 5-ft core liner sections.
NAPL = non-aqueous phase liquid
End of Boring at 10 ft.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Harbortown
SEDIMENT BORING HT16-22
DATE COLLECTED 6/10/2016 10:25:00 AM
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.28
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
DATE LOGGED 6/13/2016 9:45:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cascade Drilling
NORTHING* 306798.68
EASTING* 13487501.14
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
ELEVATION 547.1 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 100%
CO LU
UJ =3
Q 2
<
>
(Z
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
o
o
_l
0
X
CL
<
01
a
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
12
Composite
HT16-22-0010
24
Composite
HT16-22-1030
CH
CLAY: stiff gray clay, trace subangular gravel, red
clay lenses/mottling at 5-7'.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
Each core sample was collected in 5-ft core liner sections.
NAPL = non-aqueous phase liquid
End of Boring at 10 ft.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Harbortown
SEDIMENT BORING HT16-23
DATE COLLECTED 6/9/2016 5:00:00 AM
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.28
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
DATE LOGGED 6/10/2016 5:00:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cascade Drilling
NORTHING* 306788.5
EASTING* 13487351.25
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
ELEVATION 549.2 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 100%
CO LU
UJ =3
Q 2
<
>
(Z
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
o
o
_l
0
X
CL
<
01
a
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
Composite
HT16-23-0005
SW
12
Composite
HT16-23-0515
SAND: black f-m sand with gravel and cobbles. Very
thin layer of NAPL at interface with clay. PID = 70.5
ppm, strong hydrocarbon odor.
CH
CLAY: stiff gray clay, some m sand.
24
Composite
HT16-23-1535
CH
CLAY: stiff gray clay. Red mottling/clay lenses at
6-8'.
12
Composite
HT16-23-90100
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
Each core sample was collected in 5-ft core liner sections.
NAPL = non-aqueous phase liquid
PAGE 1 of 2
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Harbortown
SEDIMENT BORING HT16-23
DATE COLLECTED 6/9/2016 5:00:00 AM
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.28
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
DATE LOGGED 6/10/2016 5:00:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cascade Drilling
NORTHING* 306788.5
EASTING* 13487351.25
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
ELEVATION 549.2 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 100%
CO LU
UJ =3
Q 2
<
>
(Z
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Harbortown
SEDIMENT BORING HT16-24
DATE COLLECTED 6/9/2016 4:10:00 PM
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.28
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
DATE LOGGED 6/12/2016 12:15:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cascade Drilling
NORTHING* 306296.35
EASTING* 13486531.81
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
ELEVATION 541.1 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 100%
CO LU
UJ =3
Q 2
<
>
(Z
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
o
o
_l
0
X
CL
<
01
a
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
12
Composite
HT16-24-0010
24
Composite
HT16-24-1030
CH
CLAY: gray stiff to semi-stiff gray clay. Little
well-rounded gravel, red varving/day lenses.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
Each core sample was collected in 5-ft core liner sections.
NAPL = non-aqueous phase liquid
End of Boring at 10 ft.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Harbortown
SEDIMENT BORING HT16-25
DATE COLLECTED 6/10/2016 9:20:00 AM
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.28
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
DATE LOGGED 6/13/2016 8:45:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cascade Drilling
NORTHING* 306413.67
EASTING* 13486252.9
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
ELEVATION 565.7 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 88%
CO LU
HI 3
Q S
<
>
01
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
12
Composite
HT16-25-0010
SM
CL-ML
CH
SILT: dark gray silt with little m sand, small wood
pieces ~1/4" across.
SILTY CLAY: soft gray clay with dark gray silt, little
cobbles and pebbles.
CLAY: stiff to semi-stiff gray clay and
pebbles/cobbles and a boulder (3"x2")
24
Composite
HT16-25-1030
CH CLAY: stiff gray clay, little subangular gravel.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
Each core sample was collected in 5-ft core liner sections.
NAPL = non-aqueous phase liquid
End of Boring at 10 ft.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Harbortown
SEDIMENT BORING HT16-26
DATE COLLECTED 6/10/2016 8:30:00 AM
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.28
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
DATE LOGGED 6/12/2016 2:00:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cascade Drilling
NORTHING* 306433.06
EASTING* 13486010.1
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
ELEVATION 562.5 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 100%
CO LU
UJ =3
Q 2
<
>
(Z
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
o
o
_l
0
X
CL
<
01
a
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
12
Composite
HT16-26-0010
24
Composite
HT16-26-1030
CH
CLAY: stiff gray clay, little well-rounded gravel,
lenses of red clay at 8-10'.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
Each core sample was collected in 5-ft core liner sections.
NAPL = non-aqueous phase liquid
End of Boring at 10 ft.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Harbortown
SEDIMENT BORING HT16-27
DATE COLLECTED 6/9/2016 3:00:00 PM
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.28
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
DATE LOGGED 6/10/2016 1:50:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cascade Drilling
NORTHING* 306013.7
EASTING* 13485905.84
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
ELEVATION 551.3 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 83%
CO LU
UJ =3
Q 2
<
>
(Z
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
o
o
_l
0
X
CL
<
01
a
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
12
12
Composite
Composite
HT16-27-0010
HT16-27-1020
SM
SW
SILT: black silt with some f-vf sand, slight
hydrocarbon odor.
SAND: black f-c sand grading up to pebbles and
cobbles from 1.7-2', some shell fragments, little wood
debris, slight hydrocarbon odor and strong organic
odor. Old metal nails up to 2" long.
12
12
Composite
Composite
HT16-27-2030
HT16-27-3040
CH
CLAY: gray semisoft clay, little well-rounded gravel.
Drawdown visible on outside of core from 2-3'.
Collected -2030 sample in center of core to avoid
cross-contamination. Took -3040 sample because
there was no draw-down present on outside of core.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
Each core sample was collected in 5-ft core liner sections.
NAPL = non-aqueous phase liquid
End of Boring at 10 ft.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Harbortown
SEDIMENT BORING HT16-28
DATE COLLECTED 6/9/2016 12:30:00 PM
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.28
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
DATE LOGGED 6/12/2016 10:00:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cascade Drilling
NORTHING* 306280.29
EASTING* 13485629.4
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
ELEVATION 563.8 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 87%
CO LU
UJ =3
Q 2
<
>
(Z
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
o
o
_l
0
X
CL
<
01
a
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
Composite
HT16-28-0010
ML
SILT: dark gray to black silt, little f-m sand.
17
Composite
HT16-28-1020
CH
CLAY: gray stiff clay, trace well-rounded gravel.
12
Composite
HT16-28-6575
18
Composite
HT16-28-7590
CL
WOOD: black to dark brown wood material
decomposing to clay, hydrocarbon odor, trace clay.
Possibly relict piling.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
Each core sample was collected in 5-ft core liner sections.
NAPL = non-aqueous phase liquid
End of Boring at 10 ft.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Harbortown
SEDIMENT BORING HT16-29
DATE COLLECTED 6/9/2016 8:30:00 AM
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.28
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
DATE LOGGED 6/13/2016 3:45:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cascade Drilling
NORTHING* 305176.53
EASTING* 13484043.85
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
ELEVATION 554.6 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 70%
CO LU
UJ =3
Q 2
<
>
(Z
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
o
o
_l
0
X
CL
<
01
a
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
12
Composite
HT16-29-1020
SILTY CLAY: brown silty day, trace vf sand.
19
Composite
HT16-29-2035
GRAVEL: gravel with m-c sand, gravel to
pebble-sized pieces of brick, conglomerate/asphalt
SW
SAND: m-f black sand, little rounded gravel, wood
debris, hydrocarbon odor.
SC-CL
SANDY CLAY: black clay with some f-m sand, large
wood debris, strong hydrocarbon odor.
SW
SAND: black m-c sand, little gravel, little clay/silt,
strong hydrocarbon odor.
17
Composite
HT16-29-3550
CH
CLAY: gray stiff clay, trace clay. Red clay lenses at
6-7'.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
Each core sample was collected in 5-ft core liner sections.
NAPL = non-aqueous phase liquid
End of Boring at 10 ft.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Harbortown
SEDIMENT BORING HT16-30
DATE COLLECTED 6/8/2016 5:45:00 PM
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.28
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
DATE LOGGED 6/10/2016 10:45:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cascade Drilling
NORTHING* 304991.01
EASTING* 13483626.4
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
ELEVATION 549.8 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 78%
CO LU
UJ =3
Q 2
<
>
(Z
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
o
o
_l
0
X
CL
<
01
a
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
12
12
Composite
Composite
HT16-30-0010
HT16-30-1020
SC-CL
SC-CL
SANDY CLAY: black clayey f sand with some gravel
and shell fragments, bottle cap. Strong hydrocarbon
odor.
SANDY CLAY: black f sandy clay, strong
hydrocarbon odor.
12
Composite
HT16-30-2030
SC-CL
12
Composite
HT16-30-3040
SANDY CLAY: black sandy clay and gravel, little slag
pieces up to 2" across, NAPL present, strong
hydrocarbon odor.
CLAY: gray stiff clay with orange staining on edge of
core and into core, at interface of clay and NAPL
black sand, strong hydrocarbon odor.
CLAY: gray stiff clay, little well-rounded gravel.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
Each core sample was collected in 5-ft core liner sections.
NAPL = non-aqueous phase liquid
End of Boring at 10 ft.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Harbortown
SEDIMENT BORING HT16-31
DATE COLLECTED 6/9/2016 11:20:00 AM
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.28
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
DATE LOGGED 6/12/2016 3:15:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cascade Drilling
NORTHING* 305710.7
EASTING* 13485293.26
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
ELEVATION 544.1 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 100%
CO LU
UJ =3
Q 2
<
>
(Z
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
o
o
_l
0
X
CL
<
01
a
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
12
Composite
HT16-31-0010
24
Composite
HT16-31-1030
CH
CLAY: gray stiff clay, little subrounded gravel. Red
clay lenses at 3-6'.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
Each core sample was collected in 5-ft core liner sections.
NAPL = non-aqueous phase liquid
End of Boring at 10 ft.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Harbortown
SEDIMENT BORING HT16-32
DATE COLLECTED 6/9/2016 10:00:00 AM
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.28
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
DATE LOGGED 6/12/2016 2:45:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cascade Drilling
NORTHING* 305493.74
EASTING* 13484776.04
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
ELEVATION 544.066 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 100%
CO LU
UJ =3
Q 2
<
>
(Z
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
o
o
_l
0
X
CL
<
01
a
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
SW
12
Composite
HT16-32-0010
SAND: gray m-c sand, some gravel, little silt, trace
shell fragments.
24
Composite
HT16-32-1030
CH
CLAY: stiff gray clay, little subrounded gravel to sand.
Lenses of red clay/mottling at 5-6.5' and at 7.4'.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
Each core sample was collected in 5-ft core liner sections.
NAPL = non-aqueous phase liquid
End of Boring at 10 ft.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Harbortown
SEDIMENT BORING HT16-33
DATE COLLECTED 6/8/2016 4:00:00 PM
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.28
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
DATE LOGGED 6/10/2016 8:45:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Cascade Drilling
NORTHING* 302803.31
EASTING* 13478275.34
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
ELEVATION 546.627 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 88%
CO LU
UJ =3
Q 2
<
>
(Z
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
o
o
_l
0
X
CL
<
01
a
CO
CO
<
_i
o
CO
o
CO
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
Composite
HT16-33-0010
27
Composite
HT16-33-1030
CLAYEY SAND: black clayey f to vf sand, little
mussel shell fragments ~1/2" across, trace
well-rounded pebbles, trace wood debris.
Hydrocarbon odor.
CH
CLAY: gray semi-stiff clay. Varving towards bottom,
little f-m sand.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
Each core sample was collected in 5-ft core liner sections.
NAPL = non-aqueous phase liquid
End of Boring at 10 ft.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Riverbend
SEDIMENT BORING HBT15-A
DATE COLLECTED 10/27/2015 10:45:00 AM
DATE LOGGED 10/28/2015 11:00:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Mateco
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.25
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
NORTHING* 306146.46
EASTING* 13485699.17
ELEVATION 564.2 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 100%
CQ LU
LU 3
Q E
< c
H
ID
<
W
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
12
21
27
24
36
Composite
Composite
HBT15-A-0010
HBT15-A-1030
ML-CL
Composite
HBT15-A-3050
Composite
HBT15-A-5070
Composite
HBT15-A-7010
SILTY CLAY: gray silty clay.
CLAYEY SAND: gray sand, little clay, trace gravel,
trace cobbles up to 1,5"x1.5"
SILT: gray silt with black bands, trace f sand.
Hydrocarbon odor.
SILT: gray silt with black bands, some f-m sand,
trace gravel. Hydrocarbon odor.
CH CLAY: gray fat clay, trace gravel.
ML
SILT: black silt.
CH
CLAY: gray fat clay, trace c sand/ f gravel. Black
streaking @4.6-4.7'
CL
CLAY: gray to dark gray to black clay with
gravel-sized pieces of brick, little gravel and wood
pieces, trace cobbles.
CL
CLAY: black clay. Hydrocarbon odor. @9.5-9.6'
black sand with little clay
CLAYEY SAND: black clayey sand.
CLAY: black clay. Hydrocarbon odor.
black sand with little clay
l.5-9.6'
End of Boring at 10 ft.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Riverbend
SEDIMENT BORING HBT15-B
DATE COLLECTED 10/30/2015 10:10:00 AM
DATE LOGGED 10/30/2015 10:10:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Mateco
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.25
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
NORTHING* 305884.38
EASTING* 13485670.72
ELEVATION 555.0 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 60%
CQ LU
LU 3
o ^
< c
if) o
>-
I—
LU
<
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Riverbend
SEDIMENT BORING HBT15-C
DATE COLLECTED 10/30/2015 1:05:00 PM
DATE LOGGED 11/2/2015 3:15:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Mateco
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.25
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
NORTHING* 305773.34
EASTING* 13485495.49
ELEVATION 552.0 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 89%
CQ LU
LU 3
Q E
< c
H
ID
<
W
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
13
Composite
HBT15-C-0010
23
Composite
HBT15-C-1030
15
Composite
Composite
HBT15-C-3040
HBT15-C-4050
ML-CL SILTY CLAY: black silty clay and mussel shells with
little gravel/brown c sand.
SM SILTY SAND: brown sand with black silty clay,
well-rounded gravel/pebbles, brick pieces, glass
shards. Slight hydrocarbon odor.
CL
CLAY: gray to dark gray clay, black streaking, trace
gravel, trace woody debris.
SC-CL SANDY CLAY: dark gray m-f sandy clay, little woody
debris, trace gravel/pebbles.
CH CLAY: gray fat clay.
SC-CL SANDY CLAY: black sandy clay, trace gravel, trace
organic debris. Hydrocarbon odor.
CH CLAY: gray fat clay, trace gravel.
End of Boring at 10 ft.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
Appendix C
Photographic Record
-------
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.28
October 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT 16-01
HT16-01-SURF
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Harbortown Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern. Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.28
October 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT 16-02
HT16-02-SURF HT 16-02-2030
Harbortown Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern. Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.28
October 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT 16-03
HT16-03-SURF HT16-03-3050
Harbortown Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern. Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.28
October 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT 16-04
HT16-04-SURF
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
HT 16-04-0010
Harbortown Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern. Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.28
October 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT16-05
HT16-05-SURF HT 16-05-1020
Harbortown Site Characterization Site Characterization Report
Detroit River Area of Concern. Detroit, Michigan
HT16-05-0010
HT 16-05-2040
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.28
October 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT 16-06
HT16-06-SURF
? 'WML -5,
HT 16-06-0010
HT 16-06-1030
Harbortown Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern. Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.28
October 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT16-07
HT16-07-SURF HT16-07-3050
Harbortown Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern. Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.28
October 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT 16-08
HT16-08-SURF
HT 16-08-0010
HT 16-08-1030
Harbortown Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern. Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.28
October 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT16-09
HT16-09-SURF
HT 16-09-0010
HT 16-09-1030
Harbortown Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern. Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.28
October 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT16-10
HT16-10-SURF HT16-10-1030
*No surface sample submitted - could not
collect enough usable volume for analytical.
HT16-10-0010
Harbortown Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern. Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.28
October 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT16-11
HT16-11-SURF HT16-11-1015
Harbortown Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern. Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.28
October 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT16-12
HT16-12-SURF HT16-12-203 5
HT16-12-1020
Harbortown Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern. Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.28
October 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT16-13
HT16-13-SURF HT16-13-3050
HT16-13-Q010
HT16-13-1Q30
Harbortown Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern. Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.28
October 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT16-14
HT16-14-SURF
HT16-14-0010
HT16-14-1030
Harbortown Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern. Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.28
October 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT16-15
HT16-15-SURF
HT16-15-0010
No photo taken.
HT16-15-1020
No photo taken.
Harbortown Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern. Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.28
October 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT16-16
HT16-16-SURF HT16-16-3 05 5
06/12/2016 09:20
I IT 16-16-1030
Harbortown Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern. Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
Appendix C
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC EA Project No.: 62561.28
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology October 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT16-17
HT16-17-SURF HT16-17-3050
HT16-17-0015
HT16-17-1530
Harbortown Site Characterization Site Characterization Report
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
-------
Appendix C
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC EA Project No.: 62561.28
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology October 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: HTI6-18B
HT16-18-SURF HT16-18B-3050
HT16-18B-0010
HT16-18B-5070
HT16-18B-1030
Harbortown Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern. Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.28
October 2016
HT16-18C-1025
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT16-18C
HT16-18-SURF HT16-18C-2540
One surface sample collected; shown in
HT16-18B
HT16-18C-0010
Harbortown Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern. Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.28
October 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT16-19
HT16-19-SURF
HT16-19-5070
I IT 16-19-0010
HT16-19-1030
iltf/rt/ .g
< *<¦' 3
HT16-19-3050
Harbortown Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern. Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.28
October 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT 16-20
HT16-20-SURF HT16-20-3550
HT 16-20-0010
HT 16-20-103 5
Harbortown Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern. Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.28
October 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT 16-21
HT16-21-SURF
Harbortown Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern. Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.28
October 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT 16-22
HT16-22-SURF
HT 16-22-0010
HT 16-22-1030
Harbortown Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern. Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.28
October 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT 16-23
HT16-23-SURF HT 16-23-0515
HT16-23-0005
HT16-23-1535
Itf/o/st,
M'l I to -23
f'TO3
&
'inn ' *1
wt'>' ri •• wmm
HT 16-23-9010
1 "iinn,
Harbortown Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern. Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.28
October 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT 16-23 (Cont'd)
HT16-23-100110DS HT16-23-150160DS
HT16-23-110130DS
blto/fo
HTVfo-23
-tdipfl/O '
(Se>/c?.o
Harbortown Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern. Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.28
October 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT 16-24
HT16-24-SURF
HT 16-24-0010
HT 16-24-1030
Harbortown Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern. Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.28
October 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT16-25
HT16-25-SURF
HT 16-25-0010
HT16-25-1030
Harbortown Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern. Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.28
October 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT 16-26
HT16-26-SURF
HT 16-26-0010
HT 16-26-1030
Harbortown Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern. Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.28
October 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT 16-27
HT16-27-SURF HT 16-27-2030
HT 16-27-0010
HT 16-27-3 040
Harbortown Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern. Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.28
October 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT 16-28
HT16-28-SURF HT 16-28-7590
HT 16-28-0010
HT 16-28-1020
&
•gZ . TO?<.20.1:6. .07:47
Harbortown Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern. Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.28
October 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT 16-29
HT16-29-SURF HT 16-29-203 5
I IT 16-29-0010
HTl 6-29-35 50
Harbortown Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern. Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.28
October 2016
bllo/f/s
MTKr -23
1 " 1
* 06/10/2016 08:42
Vjn ,
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT 16-30
HT16-30-SURF HT16-30-2030 (1 of 2)
I-IT16-3 0-1020
HT16-30-0010
HT 16-3 0-2030 (2 of 2)
Harbortown Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern. Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.28
October 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT 16-31
HT16-31-SURF
HT16-31-0010
HT16-31-1030
Harbortown Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern. Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.28
October 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT 16-32
HT16-32-SURF HT16-32-1030
HT 16-32-0010
Harbortown Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern. Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.28
October 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: HT 16-33
HT16-3 3-SURF
HT 16-3 3-0010
HT16-33-1030
Harbortown Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern. Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.28
October 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: HBT15-A HBTI5-A-3050
Harbortown Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern. Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.28
October 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: HBT15-B
HBT15-B-SURF HBT15-B-3055
HBT15-B-1030
A/0TI5--Q,
o-r
Harbortown Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern. Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.28
October 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: HBT15-C
HBT15-C-SURF HBT15-C-3040
HBT15-C-0010
l'/z/(S /l£
* H-feT - £
' ''
'
' - s? a a
HBT15-C-1030
HBT15-C-3040
OD
HBT15-C-4050
' til
4s IS f5
to) ^
i . *
H-S'faloT)
. -ML aA
V
09/26/2015 01:08
Harbortown Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern. Detroit, Micliigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
Appendix D
Particle Size Graphs
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-02-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33929-1
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33929-1
Sdg Number: 33929-1
Date Sampled: 06/07/2016 1600
Date Received: 06/11/2016 1045
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/23/2016 1419
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106484
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33929-D-1 .txt
155.39 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (%) Qualifier MDL RL
Gravel 0.0
Sand 71.1
Coarse Sand 1.9
Medium Sand 2.1
Fine Sand 67.1
Silt 23.2
Clay 5.7
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-02-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33929-1
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33929-1
Sdg Number: 33929-1
Date Sampled: 06/07/2016 1600
Date Received: 06/11/2016 1045
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/23/2016 1419
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106484
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33929-D-1 .txt
155.39 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (% Passing) Qualifier MDL RL
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
98.1
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
97.2
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
96.0
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
91.3
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
80.7
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
69.0
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
28.9
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
17.6
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
15.6
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
11.6
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
7.7
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
5.7
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
3.7
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
3.7
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-03-0010
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33929-2
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33929-1
Sdg Number: 33929-1
Date Sampled: 06/09/2016 1220
Date Received: 06/11/2016 1045
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/23/2016 1421
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106484
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33929-B-2.txt
76.5 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (%) Qualifier MDL RL
Gravel 5.1
Sand 43.6
Coarse Sand 5.8
Medium Sand 9.5
Fine Sand 28.3
Silt 31.0
Clay 20.3
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-03-0010
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33929-2
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33929-1
Sdg Number: 33929-1
Date Sampled: 06/09/2016 1220
Date Received: 06/11/2016 1045
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/23/2016 1421
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106484
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33929-B-2.txt
76.5 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (% Passing) Qualifier MDL RL
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
94.9
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
89.1
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
84.7
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
79.6
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
71.5
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
65.1
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
61.4
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
51.3
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
38.4
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
33.6
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
28.7
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
23.9
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
20.3
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
14.2
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
10.6
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-03-1030
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33929-3
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33929-1
Sdg Number: 33929-1
Date Sampled: 06/09/2016 1225
Date Received: 06/11/2016 1045
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/23/2016 1422
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106484
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33929-B-3.txt
70.84 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (%) Qualifier MDL RL
Gravel 4.7
Sand 41.5
Coarse Sand 4.1
Medium Sand 7.9
Fine Sand 29.5
Silt 35.9
Clay 17.9
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-03-1030
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33929-3
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33929-1
Sdg Number: 33929-1
Date Sampled: 06/09/2016 1225
Date Received: 06/11/2016 1045
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/23/2016 1422
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106484
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33929-B-3.txt
70.84 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (% Passing) Qualifier MDL RL
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
95.3
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
91.2
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
87.8
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
83.3
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
75.4
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
69.0
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
65.1
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
53.8
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
36.2
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
31.0
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
25.7
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
21.8
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
17.9
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
12.7
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
8.8
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-03-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33929-4
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33929-1
Sdg Number: 33929-1
Date Sampled: 06/08/2016 1215
Date Received: 06/11/2016 1045
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/23/2016 1424
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106484
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33929-D~4.txt
156.67 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (%) Qualifier MDL RL
Gravel 21.4
Sand 62.6
Coarse Sand 11.1
Medium Sand 12.1
Fine Sand 39.4
Silt 11.1
Clay 4.9
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-03-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33929-4
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33929-1
Sdg Number: 33929-1
Date Sampled: 06/08/2016 1215
Date Received: 06/11/2016 1045
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/23/2016 1424
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106484
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33929-D~4.txt
156.67 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (% Passing) Qualifier MDL RL
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
95.0
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
78.6
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
67.5
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
61.6
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
55.4
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
43.2
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
29.4
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
22.1
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
16.0
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
11.5
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
10.0
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
7.9
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
6.4
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
4.9
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
3.5
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
2.7
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-04-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33929-5
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33929-1
Sdg Number: 33929-1
Date Sampled: 06/08/2016 1350
Date Received: 06/11/2016 1045
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/23/2016 1426
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106484
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33929-D-5.txt
156 31 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (%) Qualifier MDL RL
Gravel 6.9
Sand 49.4
Coarse Sand 3.2
Medium Sand 4.9
Fine Sand 41.3
Silt 33.8
Clay 9.9
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-04-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33929-5
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33929-1
Sdg Number: 33929-1
Date Sampled: 06/08/2016 1350
Date Received: 06/11/2016 1045
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/23/2016 1426
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106484
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33929-D-5.txt
156 31 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (% Passing) Qualifier MDL RL
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
95.4
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
93.1
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
89.9
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
88.0
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
85.0
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
77.5
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
69.3
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
61.7
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
43.7
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
25.0
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
20.0
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
14.9
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
11.6
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
9.9
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
6.5
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
4.0
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-04-SURF-FD
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33929-6FD
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33929-1
Sdg Number: 33929-1
Date Sampled: 06/08/2016 1350
Date Received: 06/11/2016 1045
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/23/2016 1427
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106484
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33929-D-6.txt
157.1 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (%) Qualifier MDL RL
Gravel 0.7
Sand 47.7
Coarse Sand 2.0
Medium Sand 4.7
Fine Sand 41.0
Silt 41.3
Clay 10.3
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-04-SURF-FD
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33929-6FD
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33929-1
Sdg Number: 33929-1
Date Sampled: 06/08/2016 1350
Date Received: 06/11/2016 1045
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/23/2016 1427
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106484
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33929-D-6.txt
157.1 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (% Passing) Qualifier MDL RL
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
99.3
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
97.3
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
95.5
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
92.6
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
84.8
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
76.4
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
68.9
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
51.6
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
27.7
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
22.5
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
17.2
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
13.7
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
10.3
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
7.6
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
5.0
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-30-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33929-7
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33929-1
Sdg Number: 33929-1
Date Sampled: 06/08/2016 1745
Date Received: 06/11/2016 1045
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/23/2016 1428
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106484
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33929-D-7.txt
192.64 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (%) Qualifier MDL RL
Gravel 11.0
Sand 80.6
Coarse Sand 6.7
Medium Sand 15.1
Fine Sand 58.8
Silt 6.9
Clay 1.5
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-30-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33929-7
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33929-1
Sdg Number: 33929-1
Date Sampled: 06/08/2016 1745
Date Received: 06/11/2016 1045
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/23/2016 1428
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106484
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33929-D-7.txt
192.64 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (% Passing) Qualifier MDL RL
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
95.0
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
89.0
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
82.3
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
78.0
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
67.2
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
41.8
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
26.8
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
19.6
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
8.4
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
4.4
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
3.8
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
3.2
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
2.1
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
1.5
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
1
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
1
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-33-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33929-8
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33929-1
Sdg Number: 33929-1
Date Sampled: 06/08/2016 1600
Date Received: 06/11/2016 1045
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/23/2016 1430
N/A
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Batch: 200-106484
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33929-D-8.txt
190.46 g
Analyte
Gravel
Sand
Coarse Sand
Medium Sand
Fine Sand
Silt
Clay
DryWt Corrected: N
Result (%)
5.3
86.3
2.9
1.9
81.5
7.5
1
Qualifier
MDL
RL
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-33-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33929-8
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33929-1
Sdg Number: 33929-1
Date Sampled: 06/08/2016 1600
Date Received: 06/11/2016 1045
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/23/2016 1430
N/A
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Batch: 200-106484
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33929-D-8.txt
190.46 g
Analyte
DryWt Corrected: N
Result (% Passing) Qualifier
MDL
RL
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
94.7
91.8
91.2
89.9
81.9
57.8
35.0
8.4
2.1
2.1
2.1
1.5
1
1
1
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-02-0010
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33929-9
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33929-1
Sdg Number: 33929-1
Date Sampled: 06/09/2016 1620
Date Received: 06/11/2016 1045
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/23/2016 1432
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106484
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33929-B-9.txt
147.2 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (%) Qualifier MDL RL
Gravel 0.0
Sand 30.7
Coarse Sand 0.7
Medium Sand 0.8
Fine Sand 29.2
Silt 54.3
Clay 15.0
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-02-0010
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33929-9
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33929-1
Sdg Number: 33929-1
Date Sampled: 06/09/2016 1620
Date Received: 06/11/2016 1045
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/23/2016 1432
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106484
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33929-B-9.txt
147.2 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (% Passing) Qualifier MDL RL
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
99.3
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
98.8
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
98.5
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
97.5
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
94.6
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
90.5
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
69.3
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
39.9
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
34.1
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
24.6
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
18.9
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
15.0
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
9.3
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
6.5
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-02-1020
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33929-10
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33929-1
Sdg Number: 33929-1
Date Sampled: 06/09/2016 1625
Date Received: 06/11/2016 1045
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/23/2016 1433
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106484
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33929-B-10.txt
156.33 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (%) Qualifier MDL RL
Gravel 2.6
Sand 42.4
Coarse Sand 0.5
Medium Sand 1.3
Fine Sand 40.6
Silt 43.3
Clay 11.7
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-02-1020
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33929-10
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33929-1
Sdg Number: 33929-1
Date Sampled: 06/09/2016 1625
Date Received: 06/11/2016 1045
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/23/2016 1433
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106484
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33929-B-10.txt
156.33 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (% Passing) Qualifier MDL RL
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
97.7
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
97.4
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
96.9
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
96.4
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
95.6
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
93.5
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
88.4
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
81.5
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
55.0
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
30.3
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
25.1
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
17.7
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
13.9
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
11.7
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
6.5
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
4.3
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-02-2030
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33929-11
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33929-1
Sdg Number: 33929-1
Date Sampled: 06/09/2016 1630
Date Received: 06/11/2016 1045
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/23/2016 1438
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106484
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33929-B-11 .txt
155.29 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (%) Qualifier MDL RL
Gravel 0.0
Sand 14.8
Coarse Sand 0.0
Medium Sand 0.2
Fine Sand 14.6
Silt 65.7
Clay 19.5
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-02-2030
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33929-11
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33929-1
Sdg Number: 33929-1
Date Sampled: 06/09/2016 1630
Date Received: 06/11/2016 1045
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/23/2016 1438
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106484
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33929-B-11 .txt
155.29 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (% Passing) Qualifier MDL RL
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
99.9
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
99.8
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
99.0
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
96.8
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
94.2
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
85.2
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
52.8
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
37.7
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
32.4
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
25.6
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
19.5
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
13.4
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
8.9
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-23-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33929-12
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33929-1
Sdg Number: 33929-1
Date Sampled: 06/09/2016 1700
Date Received: 06/11/2016 1045
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/23/2016 1439
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106484
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33929-D-12.txt
194.03 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (%) Qualifier MDL RL
Gravel 7.5
Sand 87.3
Coarse Sand 9.6
Medium Sand 13.6
Fine Sand 64.1
Silt 4.2
Clay 1.0
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-23-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33929-12
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33929-1
Sdg Number: 33929-1
Date Sampled: 06/09/2016 1700
Date Received: 06/11/2016 1045
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/23/2016 1439
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106484
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33929-D-12.txt
194.03 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (% Passing) Qualifier MDL RL
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
92.5
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
82.9
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
77.8
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
69.3
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
48.7
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
29.5
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
18.9
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
5.2
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
1.0
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
1.0
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
1.0
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
1.0
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
1.0
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
1.0
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
1.0
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-24-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33929-13
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33929-1
Sdg Number: 33929-1
Date Sampled: 06/09/2016 1610
Date Received: 06/11/2016 1045
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/23/2016 1520
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106484
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33929-D-13.txt
156.78 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (%) Qualifier MDL RL
Gravel 11.3
Sand 35.9
Coarse Sand 5.9
Medium Sand 6.0
Fine Sand 24.0
Silt 29.9
Clay 22.9
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-24-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33929-13
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33929-1
Sdg Number: 33929-1
Date Sampled: 06/09/2016 1610
Date Received: 06/11/2016 1045
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/23/2016 1520
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106484
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33929-D-13.txt
156.78 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (% Passing) Qualifier MDL RL
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
93.6
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
88.7
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
82 8
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
79.7
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
76.8
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
70.8
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
63.7
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
59.6
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
52.8
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
34.2
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
31.5
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
28.9
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
24.2
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
22.9
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
17.1
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
12.9
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-27-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33929-14
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33929-1
Sdg Number: 33929-1
Date Sampled: 06/09/2016 1500
Date Received: 06/11/2016 1045
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/23/2016 1521
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106484
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33929-D-14.txt
256.99 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (%) Qualifier MDL RL
Gravel 52.2
Sand 32.2
Coarse Sand 9.8
Medium Sand 2.2
Fine Sand 20.2
Silt 12.5
Clay 3.1
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-27-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33929-14
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33929-1
Sdg Number: 33929-1
Date Sampled: 06/09/2016 1500
Date Received: 06/11/2016 1045
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/23/2016 1521
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106484
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33929-D-14.txt
256.99 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (% Passing) Qualifier MDL RL
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
73.5
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
47.8
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
38.0
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
37.1
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
35.8
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
31.8
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
28.4
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
26.6
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
15.6
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
10.3
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
6.4
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
5.3
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
3.6
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
3.1
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
0.4
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
0.3
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 6/11/2016
Sample ID: HT16-02-SURF Percent Solids: 52.1% Start Date: 6/23/2016
Lab ID: 200-33929-D-1 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 6/30/2016
Shape (> #10): jia Non-soil material: plant
Hardness (> #10): na
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
100.0
0.0
#10
2000
98.1
1.9
#20
850
97.2
0.9
#40
425
96.0
1.2
#60
250
91.3
4.7
#80
180
80.7
10.6
#100
150
69.0
11.7
#200
75
28.9
40.1
Hyd1
34.7
17.6
11.3
Hyd2
22.2
15.6
2.0
Hyd3
13.1
11.6
4.0
Hyd4
9.4
7.7
3.9
Hyd5
6.8
5.7
2.0
Hyd6
3.3
3.7
2.0
Hyd7
1.4
3.7
0.0
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
0.0
Sand
71.1
Coarse Sand
1.9
Medium Sand
2.1
Fine Sand
67.1
Silt
23.2
Clay
5.7
TestAmerica Burlington
200-33929-D-1 6/30/2016
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 6/11/2016
Sample ID: HT16-03-0010 Percent Solids: 86.8% Start Date: 6/23/2016
Lab ID: 200-33929-B-2 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 6/30/2016
Shape (>#10): subrounded Non-soil material: na
Hardness (> #10): hard
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
Particle
Percent
Incremental
size
size, um
finer
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
94.9
5.1
#10
2000
89.1
5.8
#20
850
84.7
4.4
#40
425
79.6
5.1
#60
250
71.5
8.1
#80
180
65.1
6.4
#100
150
61.4
3.7
#200
75
51.3
10.1
Hyd1
32.2
38.4
12.9
Hyd2
20.8
33.6
4.8
Hyd3
12.3
28.7
4.9
Hyd4
8.9
23.9
4.8
Hyd5
6.5
20.3
3.6
Hyd6
3.2
14.2
6.1
Hyd7
1.4
10.6
3.6
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
5.1
Sand
43.6
Coarse Sand
5.8
Medium Sand
9.5
Fine Sand
28.3
Silt
31.0
Clay
20.3
TestAmerica Burlington
200-33929-B-2 6/30/2016
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 6/11/2016
Sample ID: HT16-03-1030 Percent Solids: 87.0% Start Date: 6/23/2016
Lab ID: 200-33929-B-3 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 6/30/2016
Shape (>#10): subrounded Non-soil material: na
Hardness (> #10): hard
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
Particle
Percent
Incremental
size
size, um
finer
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
95.3
4.7
#10
2000
91.2
4.1
#20
850
87.8
3.4
#40
425
83.3
4.5
#60
250
75.4
7.9
#80
180
69.0
6.4
#100
150
65.1
3.9
#200
75
53.8
11.3
Hyd1
32.9
36.2
17.6
Hyd2
21.3
31.0
5.2
Hyd3
12.6
25.7
5.3
Hyd4
9.2
21.8
3.9
Hyd5
6.6
17.9
3.9
Hyd6
3.2
12.7
5.2
Hyd7
1.4
00
00
3.9
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
4.7
Sand
41.5
Coarse Sand
4.1
Medium Sand
7.9
Fine Sand
29.5
Silt
35.9
Clay
17.9
TestAmerica Burlington
200-33929-B-3 6/30/2016
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 6/11/2016
Sample ID: HT16-03-SURF Percent Solids: 70.1% Start Date: S'23/2016
Lab ID: 200-33929-D-4 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 6/30/2016
Shape (> #10): sutxounded Non-soil material: na
Hardness (> #10): hard
Sieve
Particle
Percent
Incremental
size
size, um
finer
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
95.0
5.0
#4
4750
78.6
16.4
#10
2000
67.5
11.1
#20
850
61.6
5.9
#40
425
55.4
6.2
#60
250
43.2
12.2
#80
180
29.4
13.8
#100
150
22.1
7.3
#200
75
16.0
6.1
Hyd1
35.1
11.5
4.5
Hyd2
22.4
10.0
1.5
Hyd3
13.1
7.9
2.2
Hyd4
9.5
6.4
1.5
Hyd5
6.5
4.9
1.5
Hyd6
3.3
3.5
1.5
Hyd7
1.4
2.7
0.7
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
21.4
Sand
62.6
Coarse Sand
11.1
Medium Sand
12.1
Fine Sand
39.4
Silt
11.1
Clay
4.9
TestAmerica Burlington
200-33929-D-4 6/30/2016
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 6/11/2016
Sample ID: HT16-04-SURF Percent Solids: 61.1% Start Date: 6/23/2016
Lab ID: 200-33929-D-5 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 6/30/2016
Shape (>#10): subrounded Non-soil material: na
Hardness (> #10): hard
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
95.4
4.6
#4
4750
93.1
2.3
#10
2000
89.9
3.2
#20
850
88.0
1.9
#40
425
85.0
3.0
#60
250
77.5
7.5
#80
180
69.3
8.2
#100
150
61.7
7.6
#200
75
43.7
18.0
Hyd1
32.6
25.0
18.7
Hyd2
21.3
20.0
5.0
Hyd3
12.7
14.9
5.1
Hyd4
9
11.6
3.3
Hyd5
6.5
9.9
1.7
Hyd6
3.3
6.5
3.4
Hyd7
1.4
4.0
2.5
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
6.9
Sand
49.4
Coarse Sand
3.2
Medium Sand
4.9
Fine Sand
41.3
Silt
33.8
Clay
9.9
TestAmerica Burlington
200-33929-D-5 6/30/2016
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Sample ID:
Lab ID:"
HT16-04-SURF-FD
200-33929-D-6
Percent Solids:
Specific Gravity:
58.5%
2.650
Date Received:
Start Date:
End Date:
6/11/2016
6/23/2016
6/30/2016
Shape (> #10): subrounded
Non-soil material: na
Hardness (> #10): hard
—
V-
\
\
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
100000
10000
1000 100
Particle Size, microns (um)
10
Sieve
Particle
Percent
Incremental
size
size, um
finer
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
99.3
0.7
#10
2000
97.3
2.0
#20
850
95.5
1.8
#40
425
92.6
2.9
#60
250
84.8
7.8
#80
180
76.4
8.4
#100
150
68.9
7.5
#200
75
51.6
17.3
Hyd1
32.2
27.7
23.9
Hyd2
21.1
22.5
5.2
Hyd3
12.6
17.2
5.3
Hyd4
8.9
13.7
3.5
Hyd5
6.6
10.3
3.4
Hyd6
3.4
7.6
2.7
Hyd7
1.4
5.0
2.6
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
0.7
Sand
47.7
Coarse Sand
2.0
Medium Sand
4.7
Fine Sand
41.0
Silt
41.3
Clay
10.3
TestAmerica Burlington
200-33929-D-6 6/30/2016
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 6/11/2016
Sample ID: HT16-30-SURF Percent Solids: 74.3% Start Date: S'23/2016
Lab ID: 200-33929-D-7 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 6/30/2016
Shape (> #10): sutxounded Non-soil material: shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
95.0
5.0
#4
4750
89.0
6.0
#10
2000
82.3
6.7
#20
850
78.0
4.3
#40
425
67.2
10.8
#60
250
41.8
25.4
#80
180
26.8
15.0
#100
150
19.6
7.2
#200
75
8.4
11.2
Hyd1
36.5
4.4
4.1
Hyd2
23.2
3.8
0.6
Hyd3
13.4
3.2
0.6
Hyd4
9.4
2.1
1.1
Hyd5
6.9
1.5
0.6
Hyd6
3.3
1.0
0.6
Hyd7
1.4
1.0
0.0
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
11.0
Sand
80.6
Coarse Sand
6.7
Medium Sand
15.1
Fine Sand
58.8
Silt
6.9
Clay
1.5
TestAmerica Burlington
200-33929-D-7 6/30/2016
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 6/11/2016
Sample ID: HT16-33-SURF Percent Solids: 75.0% Start Date: 6/23/2016
Lab ID: 200-33929-D-8 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 6/30/2016
Shape (>#10): subrounded Non-soil material: shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
\
\
\
\
—0-
0
c-
—»
100000 10000 1000 100 10 1
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
94.7
5.3
#10
2000
91.8
2.9
#20
850
91.2
0.6
#40
425
89.9
1.3
#60
250
81.9
8.0
#80
180
57.8
24.1
#100
150
35.0
22.8
#200
75
8.4
26.6
Hyd1
37.1
2.1
6.3
Hyd2
23.5
2.1
0.0
Hyd3
13.6
2.1
0.0
Hyd4
9.3
1.5
0.6
Hyd5
6.8
1.0
0.6
Hyd6
3.3
1.0
0.0
Hyd7
1.4
1.0
0.0
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
5.3
Sand
86.3
Coarse Sand
2.9
Medium Sand
1.9
Fine Sand
81.5
Silt
7.5
Clay
1.0
TestAmerica Burlington
200-33929-D-8 6/30/2016
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Sample ID:
Lab ID:"
HT16-02-0010
200-33929-B-9
Percent Solids:
Specific Gravity:
57.1%
2.650
Date Received:
Start Date:
End Date:
6/11/2016
6/23/2016
6/30/2016
Shape (> #10): na
Non-soil material: plant
Hardness (> #10): na
100
90
80
70 „
V
60
50
40
30
20
10
100000
10000
1000 100
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
Particle
Percent
Incremental
size
size, um
finer
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
100.0
0.0
#10
2000
99.3
0.7
#20
850
98.8
0.5
#40
425
98.5
0.3
#60
250
97.5
1.0
#80
180
94.6
2.9
#100
150
90.5
4.1
#200
75
69.3
21.2
Hyd1
30.3
39.9
29.4
Hyd2
19.9
34.1
5.8
Hyd3
12.2
24.6
9.5
Hyd4
8.9
18.9
5.7
Hyd5
6.3
15.0
3.9
Hyd6
3.2
9.3
5.7
Hyd7
1.4
6.5
2.9
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
0.0
Sand
30.7
Coarse Sand
0.7
Medium Sand
0.8
Fine Sand
29.2
Silt
54.3
Clay
15.0
TestAmerica Burlington
200-33929-B-9 6/30/2016
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 6/11/2016
Sample ID: HT16-02-1020 Percent Solids: 68.8% Start Date: 6/23/2016
Lab ID: 200-33929-B-10 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 6/30/2016
Shape (>#10): subrounded Non-soil material: plant
Hardness (> #10): hard
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
Particle
Percent
Incremental
size
size, um
finer
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
97.7
2.3
#4
4750
97.4
0.3
#10
2000
96.9
0.5
#20
850
96.4
0.5
#40
425
95.6
0.8
#60
250
93.5
2.1
#80
180
88.4
5.1
#100
150
81.5
6.9
#200
75
55.0
26.5
Hyd1
30.5
30.3
24.7
Hyd2
20.1
25.1
5.2
Hyd3
12.3
17.7
7.4
Hyd4
8.9
13.9
3.8
Hyd5
6.6
11.7
2.2
Hyd6
3.3
6.5
5.2
Hyd7
1.4
4.3
2.2
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
2.6
Sand
42.4
Coarse Sand
0.5
Medium Sand
1.3
Fine Sand
40.6
Silt
43.3
Clay
11.7
TestAmerica Burlington
200-33929-B-10 6/30/2016
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 6/11/2016
Sample ID: HT16-02-2030 Percent Solids: 68.5% Start Date: 6/23/2016
Lab ID: 200-33929-B-11 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 6/30/2016
Shape (> #10): jia Non-soil material: na
Hardness (> #10): na
100000
10000
1000 100
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
100.0
0.0
#10
2000
100.0
0.0
#20
850
99.9
0.1
#40
425
99.8
0.1
#60
250
99.0
0.8
#80
180
96.8
2.2
#100
150
94.2
2.6
#200
75
85.2
9.0
Hyd1
24
52.8
32.4
Hyd2
18.1
37.7
15.1
Hyd3
11
32.4
5.3
Hyd4
8.2
25.6
6.8
Hyd5
5.9
19.5
6.1
Hyd6
3.2
13.4
6.1
Hyd7
1.4
8.9
4.5
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
0.0
Sand
14.8
Coarse Sand
0.0
Medium Sand
0.2
Fine Sand
14.6
Silt
65.7
Clay
19.5
TestAmerica Burlington
200-33929-B-11
6/30/2016
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 6/11/2016
Sample ID: HT16-23-SURF Percent Solids: 70.5% Start Date: 6/23/2016
Lab ID: 200-33929-D-12 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 6/30/2016
Shape (>#10): subrounded Non-soil material: shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
92.5
7.5
#10
2000
82.9
9.6
#20
850
77.8
5.1
#40
425
69.3
8.5
#60
250
48.7
20.6
#80
180
29.5
19.2
#100
150
18.9
10.6
#200
75
5.2
13.7
Hyd1
37.4
1.0
4.2
Hyd2
23.7
1.0
0.0
Hyd3
13.7
1.0
0.0
Hyd4
9.5
1.0
0.0
Hyd5
7
1.0
0.0
Hyd6
3.5
1.0
0.0
Hyd7
1.4
1.0
0.0
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
7.5
Sand
87.3
Coarse Sand
9.6
Medium Sand
13.6
Fine Sand
64.1
Silt
4.2
Clay
1.0
TestAmerica Burlington
200-33929-D-12 6/30/2016
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 6/11/2016
Sample ID: HT16-24-SURF Percent Solids: 77.3% Start Date: 6/23/2016
Lab ID: 200-33929-D-13 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 6/30/2016
Shape (>#10): subrounded Non-soil material: shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
93.6
6.4
#4
4750
88.7
4.9
#10
2000
82.8
5.9
#20
850
79.7
3.1
#40
425
76.8
2.9
#60
250
70.8
6.0
#80
180
63.7
7.1
#100
150
59.6
4.1
#200
75
52.8
6.8
Hyd1
27.9
34.2
18.6
Hyd2
18.2
31.5
2.7
Hyd3
10.8
28.9
2.6
Hyd4
8
24.2
4.7
Hyd5
5.8
22.9
1.3
Hyd6
2.9
17.1
5.8
Hyd7
1.3
12.9
4.2
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
11.3
Sand
35.9
Coarse Sand
5.9
Medium Sand
6.0
Fine Sand
24.0
Silt
29.9
Clay
22.9
TestAmerica Burlington
200-33929-D-13 6/30/2016
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Sample ID:
Lab ID:"
HT16-27-SURF
200-33929-D-14
Percent Solids:
Specific Gravity:
56.2%
2.650
Date Received:
Start Date:
End Date:
6/11/2016
6/23/2016
6/30/2016
Shape (> #10): subrounded
Non-soil material: shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
-o-
6
100
90
80
70 „
60
50
40
30
20
10
100000
10000
1000 100
Particle Size, microns (um)
10
Sieve
Particle
Percent
Incremental
size
size, um
finer
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
73.5
26.5
#4
4750
47.8
25.7
#10
2000
38.0
9.8
#20
850
37.1
0.9
#40
425
35.8
1.3
#60
250
31.8
4.0
#80
180
28.4
3.4
#100
150
26.6
1.8
#200
75
15.6
11.0
Hyd1
34.4
10.3
5.3
Hyd2
22.6
6.4
3.9
Hyd3
13.1
5.3
1.1
Hyd4
9.4
3.6
1.7
Hyd5
6.8
3.1
0.6
Hyd6
3.3
0.4
2.7
Hyd7
1.4
0.3
0.1
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
52.2
Sand
32.2
Coarse Sand
9.8
Medium Sand
2.2
Fine Sand
20.2
Silt
12.5
Clay
3.1
TestAmerica Burlington
200-33929-D-14 6/30/2016
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
6/11/2016
Client Sample ID
HT16-02-SURF
Start Date
06/23/2016 14:19
Lab Sample ID
200-33929-D-1
End Date
06/30/2016 13:12
Dry Weight Determination Non-soil material: plant
Tin Weight
4.38 g
Shape (>#10): na
Wet Sample + Tin
131.71 g
Hardness (> #10): na
Dry Sample + Tin
70.72 g
% Moisture
47.90 %
Date/Time in oven
06/23/2016 14:20
Date/Time out of oven
06/24/2016 10:48
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
50.70 206.09
155.39
Serial Number
426928
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
81
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
11/13/2014
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0040
Sample >=#10
1.54
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
79.5
Reading at High Temp
1.0025
% Passing #10
51.2
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00825
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (urn)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#10
2000
462.79
464.33
1.54 g
98.1 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
380.46
381.18
0.72 g
97.2 Sand
Medium
#40
425
354.23
355.17
0.94 g
96.0 Sand
Medium
#60
250
352.17
356.01
3.84 g
91.3 Sand
Fine
#80
180
338.48
347.04
8.56 g
80.7 Sand
Fine
#100
150
329.16
338.60
9.44 g
69.0 Sand
Fine
#200
75
323.88
356.34
32.46 g
28.9 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
28.9
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
81
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0120
20.5
34.7
17.6 Silt
5
5
1.0110
20.5
22.2
15.6 Silt
15
15
1.0090
20.5
13.1
11.6 Silt
30
30
1.0070
20.5
9.4
7.68 Silt
60
59
1.0060
20.5
6.8
5.7 Silt
250
256
1.0050
20.5
3.3
3.72 Clay
1440
1440
1.0050
20.5
1.4
3.72 Clay
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
6/11/2016
Client Sample ID
HT16-03-0010
Start Date
06/23/2016 14:21
Lab Sample ID
200-33929-B-2
End Date
06/30/2016 14:14
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
na
Tin Weight
4.21 g
Shape (>#10):
subrounded
Wet Sample + Tin
187.57 g
Hardness (> #10):
hard
Dry Sample + Tin
163.41 g
% Moisture
13.18 %
Date/Time in oven
06/23/2016 14:21
Date/Time out of oven
06/24/2016 10:49
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g) Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
50.68 127.18
76.5
Serial Number
426928
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
66.4
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
11/13/2014
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g) Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0040
Sample >=#10
7.26
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
59.1
Reading at High Temp
1.0025
% Passing #10
77.3
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00825
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
488.17
491.57
3.40 g
94.9 Gravel
#10
2000
462.79
466.65
3.86 g
89.1 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
380.46
383.38
2.92 g
84.7 Sand
Medium
#40
425
354.23
357.64
3.41 g
79.6 Sand
Medium
#60
250
352.17
357.55
5.38 g
71.5 Sand
Fine
#80
180
338.48
342.70
4.22 g
65.1 Sand
Fine
#100
150
329.16
331.62
2.46 g
61.4 Sand
Fine
#200
75
323.88
330.60
6.72 g
51.3 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
51.3
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
66.4
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0190
20.5
32.2
38.4 Silt
5
5
1.0170
20.5
20.8
33.6 Silt
15
15
1.0150
20.5
12.3
28.7 Silt
30
30
1.0130
20.5
8.9
23.9 Silt
60
58
1.0115
20.5
6.5
20.3 Silt
250
256
1.0090
20.5
3.2
14.2 Clay
1440
1440
1.0075
20.5
1.4
10.6 Clay
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
6/11/2016
Client Sample ID
HT16-03-1030
Start Date
06/23/2016 14:22
Lab Sample ID
200-33929-B-3
End Date
06/30/2016 14:24
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
na
Tin Weight
4.14 g
Shape (>#10):
subrounded
Wet Sample + Tin
221.62 g
Hardness (> #10):
hard
Dry Sample + Tin
193.28 g
% Moisture
13.03 %
Date/Time in oven
06/23/2016 14:22
Date/Time out of oven
06/24/2016 10:49
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
47.79 118.63
70.84
Serial Number
426928
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
61.6
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
11/13/2014
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0040
Sample >=#10
5.42
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
56.2
Reading at High Temp
1.0025
% Passing #10
79.3
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00825
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
488.17
491.07
2.90 g
95.3 Gravel
#10
2000
462.79
465.31
2.52 g
91.2 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
380.46
382.54
2.08 g
87.8 Sand
Medium
#40
425
354.23
357.01
2.78 g
83.3 Sand
Medium
#60
250
352.17
357.04
4.87 g
75.4 Sand
Fine
#80
180
338.48
342.43
3.95 g
69.0 Sand
Fine
#100
150
329.16
331.56
2.40 g
65.1 Sand
Fine
#200
75
323.88
330.86
6.98 g
53.8 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
53.8
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
61.6
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0170
20.5
32.9
36.2 Silt
5
5
1.0150
20.5
21.3
31 Silt
15
15
1.0130
20.5
12.6
25.7 Silt
30
29
1.0115
20.5
9.2
21.8 Silt
60
58
1.0100
20.5
6.6
17.9 Silt
250
250
1.0080
20.5
3.2
12.7 Clay
1440
1434
1.0065
20.5
1.4
8.8 Clay
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
6/11/2016
Client Sample ID
HT16-03-SURF
Start Date
06/23/2016 14:24
Lab Sample ID
200-33929-D-4
End Date
06/30/2016 14:37
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
na
Tin Weight
4.24 g
Shape (>#10):
subrounded
Wet Sample + Tin
209.48 g
Hardness (> #10):
hard
Dry Sample + Tin
148.04 g
% Moisture
29.94 %
Date/Time in oven
06/23/2016 14:24
Date/Time out of oven
06/24/2016 10:48
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
50.69 207.36
156.67
Serial Number
426928
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
110
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
11/13/2014
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0040
Sample >=#10
35.7
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
74.3
Reading at High Temp
1.0025
% Passing #10
47.4
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00825
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
447.39
452.88
5.49 g
95.0 Gravel
#4
4750
488.17
506.16
17.99 g
78.6 Gravel
#10
2000
462.79
475.05
12.26 g
67.5 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
380.46
387.00
6.54 g
61.6 Sand
Medium
#40
425
354.23
361.05
6.82 g
55.4 Sand
Medium
#60
250
352.17
365.60
13.43 g
43.2 Sand
Fine
#80
180
338.48
353.62
15.14 g
29.4 Sand
Fine
#100
150
329.16
337.16
8.00 g
22.1 Sand
Fine
#200
75
323.88
330.59
6.71 g
16.0 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
16.0
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
110
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0110
20.5
35.1
11.5 Silt
5
5
1.0100
20.5
22.4
10 Silt
15
15
1.0085
20.5
13.1
7.85 Silt
30
29
1.0075
20.5
9.5
6.39 Silt
60
63
1.0065
20.5
6.5
4.93 Silt
250
250
1.0055
20.5
3.3
3.47 Clay
1440
1434
1.0050
20.5
1.4
2.74 Clay
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
6/11/2016
Client Sample ID
HT16-04-SURF
Start Date
06/23/2016 14:26
Lab Sample ID
200-33929-D-5
End Date
06/30/2016 14:50
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
na
Tin Weight
4.18 g
Shape (>#10):
subrounded
Wet Sample + Tin
173.36 g
Hardness (> #10):
hard
Dry Sample + Tin
107.55 g
% Moisture
38.90 %
Date/Time in oven
06/23/2016 14:26
Date/Time out of oven
06/24/2016 10:48
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
57.87 214.18
156.31
Serial Number
426928
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
95.5
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
11/13/2014
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0040
Sample >=#10
9.66
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
85.8
Reading at High Temp
1.0025
% Passing #10
54.9
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00825
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
447.39
451.79
4.40 g
95.4 Gravel
#4
4750
488.17
490.37
2.20 g
93.1 Gravel
#10
2000
462.79
465.85
3.06 g
89.9 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
380.46
382.28
1.82 g
88.0 Sand
Medium
#40
425
354.23
357.08
2.85 g
85.0 Sand
Medium
#60
250
352.17
359.38
7.21 g
77.5 Sand
Fine
#80
180
338.48
346.35
7.87 g
69.3 Sand
Fine
#100
150
329.16
336.40
7.24 g
61.7 Sand
Fine
#200
75
323.88
341.06
17.18 g
43.7 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
43.7
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
95.5
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0180
20.5
32.6
25 Silt
5
5
1.0150
20.5
21.3
20 Silt
15
15
1.0120
20.5
12.7
14.9 Silt
30
31
1.0100
20.5
9
11.6 Silt
60
60
1.0090
20.5
6.5
9.88 Silt
250
240
1.0070
20.5
3.3
6.52 Clay
1440
1424
1.0055
20.5
1.4
3.99 Clay
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
6/11/2016
Client Sample ID
HT16-04-S U R F-FD
Start Date
06/23/2016 14:27
Lab Sample ID
200-33929-D-6
End Date
06/30/2016 15:13
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
na
Tin Weight
4.34 g
Shape (>#10):
subrounded
Wet Sample + Tin
152.16 g
Hardness (> #10):
hard
Dry Sample + Tin
90.87 g
% Moisture
41.46 %
Date/Time in oven
06/23/2016 14:27
Date/Time out of oven
06/24/2016 10:50
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g) Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
58.04 215.14
157.1
Serial Number
426928
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
92
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
11/13/2014
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g) Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0040
Sample >=#10
2.49
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
89.5
Reading at High Temp
1.0025
% Passing #10
57
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00825
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
488.17
488.86
0.69 g
99.3 Gravel
#10
2000
462.79
464.59
1.80 g
97.3 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
380.46
382.09
1.63 g
95.5 Sand
Medium
#40
425
354.23
356.86
2.63 g
92.6 Sand
Medium
#60
250
352.17
359.35
7.18 g
84.8 Sand
Fine
#80
180
338.48
346.17
7.69 g
76.4 Sand
Fine
#100
150
329.16
336.05
6.89 g
68.9 Sand
Fine
#200
75
323.88
339.80
15.92 g
51.6 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
51.6
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
92
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0190
20.5
32.2
27.7 Silt
5
5
1.0160
20.5
21.1
22.5 Silt
15
15
1.0130
20.5
12.6
17.2 Silt
30
31
1.0110
20.5
8.9
13.7 Silt
60
59
1.0090
20.5
6.6
10.3 Silt
250
234
1.0075
20.5
3.4
7.64 Clay
1440
1418
1.0060
20.5
1.4
5.02 Clay
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
6/11/2016
Client Sample ID
HT16-30-SURF
Start Date
06/23/2016 14:28
Lab Sample ID
200-33929-D-7
End Date
06/30/2016 13:17
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
shell
Tin Weight
4.18 g
Shape (>#10):
subrounded
Wet Sample + Tin
145.94 g
Hardness (> #10):
hard
Dry Sample + Tin
109.51 g
% Moisture
25.70 %
Date/Time in oven
06/23/2016 14:28
Date/Time out of oven
06/24/2016 10:50
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
47.68 240.32
192.64
Serial Number
426928
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
143
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
11/13/2014
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0040
Sample >=#10
25.3
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
118
Reading at High Temp
1.0025
% Passing #10
61.3
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00825
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
447.39
454.55
7.16 g
95.0 Gravel
#4
4750
488.17
496.73
8.56 g
89.0 Gravel
#10
2000
462.79
472.38
9.59 g
82.3 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
389.50
395.64
6.14 g
78.0 Sand
Medium
#40
425
367.76
383.18
15.42 g
67.2 Sand
Medium
#60
250
349.24
385.56
36.32 g
41.8 Sand
Fine
#80
180
331.74
353.12
21.38 g
26.8 Sand
Fine
#100
150
330.76
341.04
10.28 g
19.6 Sand
Fine
#200
75
323.44
339.46
16.02 g
8.4 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
8.4
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
143
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) °/
'o Finer Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0070
20.5
36.5
4.35 Silt
5
5
1.0065
20.5
23.2
3.79 Silt
15
15
1.0060
20.5
13.4
3.23 Silt
30
31
1.0050
20.5
9.4
2.11 Silt
60
59
1.0045
20.5
6.9
1.54 Silt
250
265
1.0040
20.5
3.3
0.983 Clay
1440
1412
1.0040
20.5
1.4
0.983 Clay
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
6/11/2016
Client Sample ID
HT16-33-SURF
Start Date
06/23/2016 14:30
Lab Sample ID
200-33929-D-8
End Date
06/30/2016 14:10
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
shell
Tin Weight
4.15 g
Shape (>#10):
subrounded
Wet Sample + Tin
205.37 g
Hardness (> #10):
hard
Dry Sample + Tin
154.96 g
% Moisture
25.05 %
Date/Time in oven
06/23/2016 14:30
Date/Time out of oven
06/24/2016 10:50
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
50.08 240.54
190.46
Serial Number
426928
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
143
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
11/13/2014
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0040
Sample >=#10
11.8
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
131
Reading at High Temp
1.0025
% Passing #10
68.8
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00825
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
488.17
495.82
7.65 g
94.7 Gravel
#10
2000
462.79
466.98
4.19 g
91.8 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
389.50
390.40
0.90 g
91.2 Sand
Medium
#40
425
367.76
369.59
1.83 g
89.9 Sand
Medium
#60
250
349.24
360.61
11.37 g
81.9 Sand
Fine
#80
180
331.74
366.16
34.42 g
57.8 Sand
Fine
#100
150
330.76
363.33
32.57 g
35.0 Sand
Fine
#200
75
323.44
361.42
37.98 g
8.4 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
8.4
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
143
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) °/
'o Finer Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0050
20.5
37.1
2.11 Silt
5
5
1.0050
20.5
23.5
2.11 Silt
15
15
1.0050
20.5
13.6
2.11 Silt
30
32
1.0045
20.5
9.3
1.54 Silt
60
60
1.0040
20.5
6.8
0.983 Silt
250
259
1.0040
20.5
3.3
0.983 Clay
1440
1406
1.0040
20.5
1.4
0.983 Clay
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
6/11/2016
Client Sample ID
HT16-02-0010
Start Date
06/23/2016 14:32
Lab Sample ID
200-33929-B-9
End Date
06/30/2016 14:30
Dry Weight Determination Non-soil material: plant
Tin Weight
4.52 g
Shape (>#10): na
Wet Sample + Tin
165.02 g
Hardness (> #10): na
Dry Sample + Tin
96.22 g
% Moisture
42.87 %
Date/Time in oven
06/23/2016 14:32
Date/Time out of oven
06/24/2016 10:49
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
58.24 205.44
147.2
Serial Number
426928
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
84.1
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
11/13/2014
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0040
Sample >=#10
0.57
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
83.5
Reading at High Temp
1.0025
% Passing #10
56.7
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00825
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (urn)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#10
2000
462.79
463.36
0.57 g
99.3 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
389.50
389.93
0.43 g
98.8 Sand
Medium
#40
425
367.76
368.01
0.25 g
98.5 Sand
Medium
#60
250
349.24
350.11
0.87 g
97.5 Sand
Fine
#80
180
331.74
334.17
2.43 g
94.6 Sand
Fine
#100
150
330.76
334.19
3.43 g
90.5 Sand
Fine
#200
75
323.44
341.26
17.82 g
69.3 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
69.3
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
84.1
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0240
20.5
30.3
39.9 Silt
5
5
1.0210
20.5
19.9
34.1 Silt
15
15
1.0160
20.5
12.2
24.6 Silt
30
30
1.0130
20.5
8.9
18.9 Silt
60
63
1.0110
20.5
6.3
15 Silt
250
253
1.0080
20.5
3.2
9.31 Clay
1440
1400
1.0065
20.5
1.4
6.45 Clay
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
6/11/2016
Client Sample ID
HT16-02-1020
Start Date
06/23/2016 14:33
Lab Sample ID
200-33929-B-10
End Date
06/30/2016 14:46
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
plant
Tin Weight
4.08 g
Shape (>#10):
subrounded
Wet Sample + Tin
257.01 g
Hardness (> #10):
hard
Dry Sample + Tin
178.08 g
% Moisture
31.21 %
Date/Time in oven
06/23/2016 14:33
Date/Time out of oven
06/24/2016 10:49
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
57.87 214.20
156.33
Serial Number
426928
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
108
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
11/13/2014
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0040
Sample >=#10
3.36
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
105
Reading at High Temp
1.0025
% Passing #10
67.2
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00825
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
447.39
449.92
2.53 g
97.7 Gravel
#4
4750
488.17
488.47
0.30 g
97.4 Gravel
#10
2000
462.79
463.32
0.53 g
96.9 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
389.50
389.99
0.49 g
96.4 Sand
Medium
#40
425
367.76
368.61
0.85 g
95.6 Sand
Medium
#60
250
349.24
351.53
2.29 g
93.5 Sand
Fine
#80
180
331.74
337.29
5.55 g
88.4 Sand
Fine
#100
150
330.76
338.17
7.41 g
81.5 Sand
Fine
#200
75
323.44
352.07
28.63 g
55.0 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
55.0
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
108
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0235
20.5
30.5
30.3 Silt
5
5
1.0200
20.5
20.1
25.1 Silt
15
15
1.0150
20.5
12.3
17.7 Silt
30
30
1.0125
20.5
8.9
13.9 Silt
60
57
1.0110
20.5
6.6
11.7 Silt
250
247
1.0075
20.5
3.3
6.51 Clay
1440
1394
1.0060
20.5
1.4
4.28 Clay
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
6/11/2016
Client Sample ID
HT16-02-2030
Start Date
06/23/2016 14:38
Lab Sample ID
200-33929-B-11
End Date
06/30/2016 14:59
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material: na
Tin Weight
4.27 g
Shape (>#10): na
Wet Sample + Tin
201.89 g
Hardness (> #10): na
Dry Sample + Tin
139.67 g
% Moisture
31.48 %
Date/Time in oven
06/23/2016 14:38
Date/Time out of oven
06/24/2016 10:49
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
49.63 204.92
155.29
Serial Number
426928
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
106
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
11/13/2014
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0040
Sample >=#10
0
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
106
Reading at High Temp
1.0025
% Passing #10
68.3
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00825
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (urn)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#10
2000
0.00 g
100.0 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
389.50
389.61
0.11 g
99.9 Sand
Medium
#40
425
367.76
367.91
0.15 g
99.8 Sand
Medium
#60
250
349.24
350.04
0.80 g
99.0 Sand
Fine
#80
180
331.74
334.05
2.31 g
96.8 Sand
Fine
#100
150
330.76
333.55
2.79 g
94.2 Sand
Fine
#200
75
323.44
333.03
9.59 g
85.2 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
85.2
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
106
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0380
20.5
24
52.8 Silt
5
5
1.0280
20.5
18.1
37.7 Silt
15
15
1.0245
20.5
11
32.4 Silt
30
30
1.0200
20.5
8.2
25.6 Silt
60
63
1.0160
20.5
5.9
19.5 Silt
250
241
1.0120
20.5
3.2
13.4 Clay
1440
1388
1.0090
20.5
1.4
8.9 Clay
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
6/11/2016
Client Sample ID
HT16-23-SURF
Start Date
06/23/2016 14:39
Lab Sample ID
200-33929-D-12
End Date
06/30/2016 15:16
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
shell
Tin Weight
4.10 g
Shape (>#10):
subrounded
Wet Sample + Tin
164.07 g
Hardness (> #10):
hard
Dry Sample + Tin
116.92 g
% Moisture
29.47 %
Date/Time in oven
06/23/2016 14:39
Date/Time out of oven
06/24/2016 10:49
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
57.73 251.76
194.03
Serial Number
426928
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
137
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
11/13/2014
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0040
Sample >=#10
23.3
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
114
Reading at High Temp
1.0025
% Passing #10
58.8
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00825
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
488.17
498.40
10.23 g
92.5 Gravel
#10
2000
462.79
475.90
13.11 g
82.9 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
389.50
396.50
7.00 g
77.8 Sand
Medium
#40
425
367.76
379.41
11.65 g
69.3 Sand
Medium
#60
250
349.24
377.51
28.27 g
48.7 Sand
Fine
#80
180
331.74
358.00
26.26 g
29.5 Sand
Fine
#100
150
330.76
345.35
14.59 g
18.9 Sand
Fine
#200
75
323.44
342.19
18.75 g
5.2 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
5.2
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
137
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0040
20.5
37.4
1.03 Silt
5
5
1.0040
20.5
23.7
1.03 Silt
15
15
1.0040
20.5
13.7
1.03 Silt
30
31
1.0040
20.5
9.5
1.03 Silt
60
57
1.0040
20.5
7
1.03 Silt
250
235
1.0040
20.5
3.5
1.03 Clay
1440
1382
1.0040
20.5
1.4
1.03 Clay
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
6/11/2016
Client Sample ID
HT16-24-SURF
Start Date
06/23/2016 15:20
Lab Sample ID
200-33929-D-13
End Date
06/30/2016 13:33
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
shell
Tin Weight
4.14 g
Shape (>#10):
subrounded
Wet Sample + Tin
228.91 g
Hardness (> #10):
hard
Dry Sample + Tin
177.97 g
% Moisture
22.66 %
Date/Time in oven
06/23/2016 15:20
Date/Time out of oven
06/24/2016 10:48
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
57.97 214.75
156.78
Serial Number
410848
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
121
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
06/28/2016
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0050
Sample >=#10
20.8
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
100
Reading at High Temp
1.0035
% Passing #10
63.8
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00925
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
447.41
455.17
7.76 g
93.6 Gravel
#4
4750
488.16
494.04
5.88 g
88.7 Gravel
#10
2000
462.82
469.94
7.12 g
82.8 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
389.50
393.23
3.73 g
79.7 Sand
Medium
#40
425
367.76
371.32
3.56 g
76.8 Sand
Medium
#60
250
349.24
356.53
7.29 g
70.8 Sand
Fine
#80
180
331.74
340.36
8.62 g
63.7 Sand
Fine
#100
150
330.76
335.70
4.94 g
59.6 Sand
Fine
#200
75
323.44
331.71
8.27 g
52.8 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
52.8
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
121
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0300
20.0
27.9
34.2 Silt
5
5
1.0280
20.0
18.2
31.5 Silt
15
15
1.0260
20.0
10.8
28.9 Silt
30
30
1.0225
20.0
8
24.2 Silt
60
59
1.0215
20.0
5.8
22.9 Silt
250
256
1.0170
20.5
2.9
17.1 Clay
1440
1440
1.0140
20.0
1.3
12.9 Clay
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
6/11/2016
Client Sample ID
HT16-27-SURF
Start Date
06/23/2016 15:21
Lab Sample ID
200-33929-D-14
End Date
06/30/2016 13:32
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
shell
Tin Weight
4.29 g
Shape (>#10):
subrounded
Wet Sample + Tin
172.51 g
Hardness (> #10):
hard
Dry Sample + Tin
98.85 g
% Moisture
43.79 %
Date/Time in oven
06/23/2016 15:21
Date/Time out of oven
06/24/2016 10:48
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
50.36 307.35
256.99
Serial Number
410848
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
144
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
06/28/2016
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0050
Sample >=#10
89.2
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
54.8
Reading at High Temp
1.0035
% Passing #10
21.3
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00925
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
447.41
485.52
38.11 g
73.5 Gravel
#4
4750
488.16
525.11
36.95 g
47.8 Gravel
#10
2000
462.82
477.00
14.18 g
38.0 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
389.50
390.82
1.32 g
37.1 Sand
Medium
#40
425
367.76
369.68
1.92 g
35.8 Sand
Medium
#60
250
349.24
355.06
5.82 g
31.8 Sand
Fine
#80
180
331.74
336.70
4.96 g
28.4 Sand
Fine
#100
150
330.76
333.39
2.63 g
26.6 Sand
Fine
#200
75
323.44
339.31
15.87 g
15.6 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
15.6
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
144
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) °/
'o Finer Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0135
20.0
34.4
10.3 Silt
5
5
1.0100
20.0
22.6
6.41 Silt
15
15
1.0090
20.0
13.1
5.3 Silt
30
30
1.0075
20.0
9.4
3.62 Silt
60
58
1.0070
20.0
6.8
3.07 Silt
250
256
1.0045
20.5
3.3
0.418 Clay
1440
1440
1.0045
20.0
1.4
0.279 Clay
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-16-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33945-9
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33945-1
Sdg Number: 33945-1
Date Sampled: 06/10/2016 1215
Date Received: 06/14/2016 1200
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/24/2016 1150
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106533
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33945-D-9.txt
227.35 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (%) Qualifier MDL RL
Gravel 3.7
Sand 89.7
Coarse Sand 15.3
Medium Sand 52.1
Fine Sand 22.3
Silt 3.8
Clay 2.8
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-16-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33945-9
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33945-1
Sdg Number: 33945-1
Date Sampled: 06/10/2016 1215
Date Received: 06/14/2016 1200
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/24/2016 1150
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106533
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33945-D-9.txt
227.35 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (% Passing) Qualifier MDL RL
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
96.3
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
81.0
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
59.7
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
28.9
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
9.7
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
7.4
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
7.1
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
6.6
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
4.1
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
3.7
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
3.3
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
3.3
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
2 8
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
2.3
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
2.3
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-22-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33945-10
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33945-1
Sdg Number: 33945-1
Date Sampled: 06/10/2016 1025
Date Received: 06/14/2016 1200
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/24/2016 1152
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106533
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33945-D-10.txt
163 91 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (%) Qualifier MDL RL
Gravel 6.6
Sand 86.9
Coarse Sand 4.2
Medium Sand 10.6
Fine Sand 72.1
Silt 2.8
Clay 3.7
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-22-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33945-10
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33945-1
Sdg Number: 33945-1
Date Sampled: 06/10/2016 1025
Date Received: 06/14/2016 1200
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/24/2016 1152
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106533
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33945-D-10.txt
163 91 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (% Passing) Qualifier MDL RL
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
93.4
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
89.2
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
86.5
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
78.6
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
54.2
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
31.2
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
19.4
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
6.5
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
5.0
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
5.0
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
5.0
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
3.7
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
3.7
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
3.5
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
2 8
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-25-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33945-13
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33945-1
Sdg Number: 33945-1
Date Sampled: 06/10/2016 0920
Date Received: 06/14/2016 1200
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/24/2016 1153
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106533
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33945-D-13.txt
132.56 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (%) Qualifier MDL RL
Gravel 0.0
Sand 9.1
Coarse Sand 0.0
Medium Sand 2.7
Fine Sand 6.4
Silt 55.1
Clay 35.8
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-25-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33945-13
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33945-1
Sdg Number: 33945-1
Date Sampled: 06/10/2016 0920
Date Received: 06/14/2016 1200
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/24/2016 1153
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106533
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33945-D-13.txt
132.56 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (% Passing) Qualifier MDL RL
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
98.6
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
97.3
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
96.1
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
94.5
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
93.7
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
90.9
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
64.5
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
56.3
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
52.2
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
42.0
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
35.8
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
25.1
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
18.9
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-25-SURF-FD
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33945-14FD
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33945-1
Sdg Number: 33945-1
Date Sampled: 06/10/2016 0920
Date Received: 06/14/2016 1200
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/24/2016 1154
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106533
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33945-D-14.txt
145.12 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (%) Qualifier MDL RL
Gravel 0.0
Sand 8 2
Coarse Sand 0.0
Medium Sand 2.5
Fine Sand 5.7
Silt 67.5
Clay 24.3
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-25-SURF-FD
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33945-14FD
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33945-1
Sdg Number: 33945-1
Date Sampled: 06/10/2016 0920
Date Received: 06/14/2016 1200
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/24/2016 1154
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106533
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33945-D-14.txt
145.12 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (% Passing) Qualifier MDL RL
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
98.6
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
97.5
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
96.5
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
95.4
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
94.8
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
91.8
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
65.1
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
41.8
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
37.9
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
30.1
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
24.3
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
14.1
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
10.2
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-26-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33945-15
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33945-1
Sdg Number: 33945-1
Date Sampled: 06/10/2016 0830
Date Received: 06/14/2016 1200
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/24/2016 1603
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106533
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33945-D-15.txt
145.8 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (%) Qualifier MDL RL
Gravel 0.0
Sand 3.3
Coarse Sand 0.0
Medium Sand 0.6
Fine Sand 2.7
Silt 65.1
Clay 31.6
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-26-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33945-15
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33945-1
Sdg Number: 33945-1
Date Sampled: 06/10/2016 0830
Date Received: 06/14/2016 1200
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/24/2016 1603
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106533
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33945-D-15.txt
145.8 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (% Passing) Qualifier MDL RL
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
99.7
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
99.4
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
99.0
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
98.6
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
98.3
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
96.7
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
58.3
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
51.2
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
44.1
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
38.7
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
31.6
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
20.9
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
11.6
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-21-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33945-17
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33945-1
Sdg Number: 33945-1
Date Sampled: 06/10/2016 1115
Date Received: 06/14/2016 1200
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/24/2016 1605
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106533
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33945-D-17.txt
163.67 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (%) Qualifier MDL RL
Gravel 6.2
Sand 84.9
Coarse Sand 6.1
Medium Sand 16.4
Fine Sand 62.4
Silt 7.0
Clay 1.9
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-21-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33945-17
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33945-1
Sdg Number: 33945-1
Date Sampled: 06/10/2016 1115
Date Received: 06/14/2016 1200
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/24/2016 1605
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106533
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33945-D-17.txt
163.67 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (% Passing) Qualifier MDL RL
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
93.8
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
87.7
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
80.9
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
71.3
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
44.3
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
26.8
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
19.2
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
8.9
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
4.6
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
3.9
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
3.2
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
2.5
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
1.9
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
0.5
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
0.3
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-21-SURF-FD
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33945-18FD
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33945-1
Sdg Number: 33945-1
Date Sampled: 06/10/2016 1115
Date Received: 06/14/2016 1200
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/24/2016 1607
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106533
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33945-D-18.txt
199.68 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (%) Qualifier MDL RL
Gravel 7.9
Sand 84.0
Coarse Sand 7.7
Medium Sand 14.7
Fine Sand 61.6
Silt 6.1
Clay 2.0
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-21-SURF-FD
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33945-18FD
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33945-1
Sdg Number: 33945-1
Date Sampled: 06/10/2016 1115
Date Received: 06/14/2016 1200
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/24/2016 1607
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106533
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33945-D-18.txt
199.68 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (% Passing) Qualifier MDL RL
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
97.3
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
92.1
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
84.4
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
78.8
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
69.7
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
42.8
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
25.7
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
18.4
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
8.1
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
4.2
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
3.6
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
3.1
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
2.5
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
2.0
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
0.9
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
0.3
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 6/14/2016
Sample ID: HT16-16-SURF Percent Solids: 81.6% Start Date: 6/24/2016
Lab ID: 200-33945-D-9 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 7/1/2016
Shape (>#10): subangular Non-soil material: plant,shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
100000 10000 1000 100 10 1
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
96.3
3.7
#10
2000
81.0
15.3
#20
850
59.7
21.3
#40
425
28.9
30.8
#60
250
9.7
19.2
#80
180
7.4
2.2
#100
150
7.1
0.3
#200
75
6.6
0.5
Hyd1
36
4.1
2.5
Hyd2
22.9
3.7
0.4
Hyd3
13.3
3.3
0.4
Hyd4
9.4
3.3
0.0
Hyd5
6.5
2.8
0.4
Hyd6
3.3
2.3
0.5
Hyd7
1.4
2.3
0.0
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
3.7
Sand
89.7
Coarse Sand
15.3
Medium Sand
52.1
Fine Sand
22.3
Silt
3.8
Clay
2.8
TestAmerica Burlington
200-33945-D-9 7/1/2016
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 6/14/2016
Sample ID: HT16-22-SURF Percent Solids: 73.0% Start Date: 6/24/2016
Lab ID: 200-33945-D-10 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 7/1/2016
Shape (>#10): subangular Non-soil material: plant,shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
93.4
6.6
#10
2000
89.2
4.2
#20
850
86.5
2.7
#40
425
78.6
7.9
#60
250
54.2
24.4
#80
180
31.2
23.0
#100
150
19.4
11.8
#200
75
6.5
12.9
Hyd1
36.3
5.0
1.5
Hyd2
23
5.0
0.0
Hyd3
13.3
5.0
0.0
Hyd4
9.5
3.7
1.3
Hyd5
6.9
3.7
0.0
Hyd6
3.3
3.5
0.2
Hyd7
1.4
2.8
0.7
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
6.6
Sand
86.9
Coarse Sand
4.2
Medium Sand
10.6
Fine Sand
72.1
Silt
2.8
Clay
3.7
TestAmerica Burlington
200-33945-D-10 7/1/2016
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Sample ID:
Lab ID:"
HT16-25-SURF
200-33945-D-13
Percent Solids:
Specific Gravity:
29.6%
2.650
Date Received:
Start Date:
End Date:
6/14/2016
6/24/2016
7/1/2016
Shape (> #10): na
Non-soil material: na
Hardness (> #10): na
-!
>-
s
s
\
V
\
100
90
80
70 „
¦E
g>
60 %
>
-Q
50
c
U—
40 c
u
30 a.
20
10
0
100000
10000
1000 100
Particle Size, microns (um)
10
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
100.0
0.0
#10
2000
100.0
0.0
#20
850
98.6
1.4
#40
425
97.3
1.3
#60
250
96.1
1.2
#80
180
94.5
1.6
#100
150
93.7
0.8
#200
75
90.9
2.8
Hyd1
32
64.5
26.4
Hyd2
20.7
56.3
8.2
Hyd3
12.1
52.2
4.1
Hyd4
oo
00
42.0
10.2
Hyd5
6.2
35.8
6.2
Hyd6
3.3
25.1
10.7
Hyd7
1.4
18.9
6.2
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
0.0
Sand
9.1
Coarse Sand
0.0
Medium Sand
2.7
Fine Sand
6.4
Silt
55.1
Clay
35.8
TestAmerica Burlington
200-33945-D-13 7/1/2016
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 6/14/2016
Sample ID: HT16-25-SURF-FD Percent Solids: 28.5% Start Date: 6/24/2016
Lab ID: 200-33945-D-14 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 7/1/2016
Shape (> #10): na Non-soil material: na
Hardness (> #10): na
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
100.0
0.0
#10
2000
100.0
0.0
#20
850
98.6
1.4
#40
425
97.5
1.1
#60
250
96.5
1.0
#80
180
95.4
1.1
#100
150
94.8
0.6
#200
75
91.8
3.0
Hyd1
31.6
65.1
26.7
Hyd2
21.4
41.8
23.3
Hyd3
12.5
37.9
3.9
Hyd4
8.9
30.1
7.8
Hyd5
6.6
24.3
5.8
Hyd6
3.4
14.1
10.2
Hyd7
1.4
10.2
3.9
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
0.0
Sand
8.2
Coarse Sand
0.0
Medium Sand
2.5
Fine Sand
5.7
Silt
67.5
Clay
24.3
TestAmerica Burlington
200-33945-D-14 7/1/2016
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 6/14/2016
Sample ID: HT16-26-SURF Percent Solids: 30.9% Start Date: S'24/2016
Lab ID: 200-33945-D-15 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 7/2/2016
Shape (> #10): na Non-soil material: na
Hardness (> #10): na
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
100.0
0.0
#10
2000
100.0
0.0
#20
850
99.7
0.3
#40
425
99.4
0.3
#60
250
99.0
0.4
#80
180
98.6
0.4
#100
150
98.3
0.3
#200
75
96.7
1.6
Hyd1
31.1
58.3
38.4
Hyd2
20.1
51.2
7.1
Hyd3
11.9
44.1
7.1
Hyd4
8.5
38.7
5.4
Hyd5
6.2
31.6
7.1
Hyd6
3.1
20.9
10.7
Hyd7
1.4
11.6
9.3
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
0.0
Sand
3.3
Coarse Sand
0.0
Medium Sand
0.6
Fine Sand
2.7
Silt
65.1
Clay
31.6
TestAmerica Burlington
200-33945-D-15 7/2/2016
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 6/14/2016
Sample ID: HT16-21-SURF Percent Solids: 73.0% Start Date: 6/24/2016
Lab ID: 200-33945-D-17 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 7/2/2016
Shape (>#10): subangular Non-soil material: plant,wood,shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
93.8
6.2
#10
2000
87.7
6.1
#20
850
80.9
6.8
#40
425
71.3
9.6
#60
250
44.3
27.0
#80
180
26.8
17.5
#100
150
19.2
7.6
#200
75
8.9
10.3
Hyd1
35.6
4.6
4.3
Hyd2
22.6
3.9
0.7
Hyd3
13.1
3.2
0.7
Hyd4
9.3
2.5
0.7
Hyd5
6.7
1.9
0.7
Hyd6
3.3
0.5
1.4
Hyd7
1.4
0.3
0.2
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
6.2
Sand
84.9
Coarse Sand
6.1
Medium Sand
16.4
Fine Sand
62.4
Silt
7.0
Clay
1.9
TestAmerica Burlington
200-33945-D-17 7/2/2016
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 6/14/2016
Sample ID: HT16-21-SURF-FD Percent Solids: 75.4% Start Date: 6/24/2016
Lab ID: 200-33945-D-18 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 7/2/2016
Shape (>#10): subangular Non-soil material: plant,wood,shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
Particle
Percent
Incremental
size
size, um
finer
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
97.3
2.7
#4
4750
92.1
5.2
#10
2000
84.4
7.7
#20
850
78.8
5.6
#40
425
69.7
9.1
#60
250
42.8
26.9
#80
180
25.7
17.1
#100
150
18.4
7.3
#200
75
8.1
10.3
Hyd1
35.4
4.2
4.0
Hyd2
22.5
3.6
0.5
Hyd3
13.1
3.1
0.5
Hyd4
9.4
2.5
0.5
Hyd5
6.7
2.0
0.5
Hyd6
3.3
0.9
1.1
Hyd7
1.4
0.3
0.7
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
7.9
Sand
84.0
Coarse Sand
7.7
Medium Sand
14.7
Fine Sand
61.6
Silt
6.1
Clay
2.0
TestAmerica Burlington
200-33945-D-18 7/2/2016
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
6/14/2016
Client Sample ID
HT16-16-SURF
Start Date
06/24/2016 11:50
Lab Sample ID
200-33945-D-9
End Date
07/01/2016 9:26
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
plant,shell
Tin Weight
4.25 g
Shape (>#10):
subangular
Wet Sample + Tin
159.48 g
Hardness (> #10):
hard
Dry Sample + Tin
130.84 g
% Moisture
18.45 %
Date/Time in oven
06/24/2016 11:50
Date/Time out of oven
06/25/2016 8:29
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
57.60 284.95
227.35
Serial Number
426931
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
185
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
11/13/2014
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0050
Sample >=#10
35.1
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
150
Reading at High Temp
1.0035
% Passing #10
66
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00925
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
488.15
494.95
6.80 g
96.3 Gravel
#10
2000
462.79
491.06
28.27 g
81.0 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
389.42
428.85
39.43 g
59.7 Sand
Medium
#40
425
367.61
424.52
56.91 g
28.9 Sand
Medium
#60
250
349.20
384.78
35.58 g
9.7 Sand
Fine
#80
180
331.75
335.89
4.14 g
7.4 Sand
Fine
#100
150
330.81
331.36
0.55 g
7.1 Sand
Fine
#200
75
323.40
324.31
0.91 g
6.6 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
6.6
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
185
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0090
20.0
36
4.12 Silt
5
5
1.0085
20.0
22.9
3.69 Silt
15
15
1.0080
20.0
13.3
3.26 Silt
30
30
1.0080
20.0
9.4
3.26 Silt
60
63
1.0075
20.0
6.5
2.82 Silt
250
253
1.0070
19.5
3.3
2.28 Clay
1440
1400
1.0070
19.5
1.4
2.28 Clay
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
6/14/2016
Client Sample ID
HT16-22-SURF
Start Date
06/24/2016 11:52
Lab Sample ID
200-33945-D-10
End Date
07/01/2016 9:44
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
plant,shell
Tin Weight
4.29 g
Shape (>#10):
subangular
Wet Sample + Tin
130.89 g
Hardness (> #10):
hard
Dry Sample + Tin
96.68 g
% Moisture
27.02 %
Date/Time in oven
06/24/2016 11:52
Date/Time out of oven
06/25/2016 8:29
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
57.88 221.79
163.91
Serial Number
426931
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
120
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
11/13/2014
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0050
Sample >=#10
13
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
107
Reading at High Temp
1.0035
% Passing #10
65.3
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00925
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
488.15
496.11
7.96 g
93.4 Gravel
#10
2000
462.79
467.79
5.00 g
89.2 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
389.42
392.64
3.22 g
86.5 Sand
Medium
#40
425
367.61
377.15
9.54 g
78.6 Sand
Medium
#60
250
349.20
378.44
29.24 g
54.2 Sand
Fine
#80
180
331.75
359.37
27.62 g
31.2 Sand
Fine
#100
150
330.81
344.92
14.11 g
19.4 Sand
Fine
#200
75
323.40
338.86
15.46 g
6.5 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
6.5
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
120
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0080
20.0
36.3
5.02 Silt
5
5
1.0080
20.0
23
5.02 Silt
15
15
1.0080
20.0
13.3
5.02 Silt
30
30
1.0070
20.0
9.5
3.68 Silt
60
57
1.0070
20.0
6.9
3.68 Silt
250
247
1.0070
19.5
3.3
3.51 Clay
1440
1394
1.0065
19.5
1.4
2.84 Clay
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
6/14/2016
Client Sample ID
HT16-25-SURF
Start Date
06/24/2016 11:53
Lab Sample ID
200-33945-D-13
End Date
07/01/2016 9:59
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material: na
Tin Weight
4.37 g
Shape (>#10): na
Wet Sample + Tin
155.01 g
Hardness (> #10): na
Dry Sample + Tin
48.89 g
% Moisture
70.45 %
Date/Time in oven
06/24/2016 11:53
Date/Time out of oven
06/25/2016 8:30
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
57.99 190.55
132.56
Serial Number
426931
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
39.2
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
11/13/2014
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0050
Sample >=#10
0
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
39.2
Reading at High Temp
1.0035
% Passing #10
29.6
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00925
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (urn)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#10
2000
0.00 g
100.0 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
389.42
389.98
0.56 g
98.6 Sand
Medium
#40
425
367.61
368.13
0.52 g
97.3 Sand
Medium
#60
250
349.20
349.68
0.48 g
96.1 Sand
Fine
#80
180
331.75
332.36
0.61 g
94.5 Sand
Fine
#100
150
330.81
331.13
0.32 g
93.7 Sand
Fine
#200
75
323.40
324.48
1.08 g
90.9 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
90.9
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
39.2
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0200
20.0
32
64.5 Silt
5
5
1.0180
20.0
20.7
56.3 Silt
15
15
1.0170
20.0
12.1
52.2 Silt
30
30
1.0145
20.0
8.8
42 Silt
60
63
1.0130
20.0
6.2
35.8 Silt
250
241
1.0105
19.5
3.3
25.1 Clay
1440
1388
1.0090
19.5
1.4
18.9 Clay
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
6/14/2016
Client Sample ID
HT16-25-S U R F-FD
Start Date
06/24/2016 11:54
Lab Sample ID
200-33945-D-14
End Date
07/01/2016 10:13
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material: na
Tin Weight
4.28 g
Shape (>#10): na
Wet Sample + Tin
169.55 g
Hardness (> #10): na
Dry Sample + Tin
51.30 g
% Moisture
71.55 %
Date/Time in oven
06/24/2016 11:54
Date/Time out of oven
06/25/2016 8:30
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
57.95 203.07
145.12
Serial Number
426931
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
41.3
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
11/13/2014
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0050
Sample >=#10
0
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
41.3
Reading at High Temp
1.0035
% Passing #10
28.5
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00925
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (urn)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#10
2000
0.00 g
100.0 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
389.42
390.01
0.59 g
98.6 Sand
Medium
#40
425
367.61
368.05
0.44 g
97.5 Sand
Medium
#60
250
349.20
349.61
0.41 g
96.5 Sand
Fine
#80
180
331.75
332.19
0.44 g
95.4 Sand
Fine
#100
150
330.81
331.05
0.24 g
94.8 Sand
Fine
#200
75
323.40
324.63
1.23 g
91.8 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
91.8
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
41.3
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0210
20.0
31.6
65.1 Silt
5
5
1.0150
20.0
21.4
41.8 Silt
15
15
1.0140
20.0
12.5
37.9 Silt
30
31
1.0120
20.0
8.9
30.1 Silt
60
57
1.0105
20.0
6.6
24.3 Silt
250
235
1.0080
19.5
3.4
14.1 Clay
1440
1382
1.0070
19.5
1.4
10.2 Clay
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
6/14/2016
Client Sample ID
HT16-26-SURF
Start Date
06/24/2016 16:03
Lab Sample ID
200-33945-D-15
End Date
07/02/2016 11:27
Dry Weight Determination Non-soil material: na
Tin Weight
4.43 g
Shape (>#10): na
Wet Sample + Tin
125.63 g
Hardness (> #10): na
Dry Sample + Tin
41.90 g
% Moisture
69.08 %
Date/Time in oven
06/24/2016 16:03
Date/Time out of oven
06/25/2016 8:36
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
51.02 196.82
145.8
Serial Number
410848
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
45.1
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
06/28/2016
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0050
Sample >=#10
0
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
45.1
Reading at High Temp
1.0035
% Passing #10
30.9
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00925
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (urn)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#10
2000
0.00 g
100.0 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
380.18
380.33
0.15 g
99.7 Sand
Medium
#40
425
353.96
354.08
0.12 g
99.4 Sand
Medium
#60
250
351.77
351.95
0.18 g
99.0 Sand
Fine
#80
180
338.40
338.58
0.18 g
98.6 Sand
Fine
#100
150
329.14
329.26
0.12 g
98.3 Sand
Fine
#200
75
323.84
324.57
0.73 g
96.7 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
96.7
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
45.1
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0200
22.5
31.1
58.3 Silt
5
5
1.0180
22.5
20.1
51.2 Silt
15
15
1.0160
22.5
11.9
44.1 Silt
30
30
1.0145
22.5
8.5
38.7 Silt
60
59
1.0125
22.5
6.2
31.6 Silt
250
256
1.0100
20.5
3.1
20.9 Clay
1440
1440
1.0075
20.0
1.4
11.6 Clay
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
6/14/2016
Client Sample ID
HT16-21-SURF
Start Date
06/24/2016 16:05
Lab Sample ID
200-33945-D-17
End Date
07/02/2016 11:38
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
plant,wood,shell
Tin Weight
4.30 g
Shape (>#10):
subangular
Wet Sample + Tin
157.74 g
Hardness (> #10):
hard
Dry Sample + Tin
116.29 g
% Moisture
27.01 %
Date/Time in oven
06/24/2016 16:05
Date/Time out of oven
06/25/2016 8:36
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
58.18 221.85
163.67
Serial Number
410848
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
119
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
06/28/2016
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0050
Sample >=#10
14.6
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
104
Reading at High Temp
1.0035
% Passing #10
63.5
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00925
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
488.16
495.51
7.35 g
93.8 Gravel
#10
2000
462.85
470.12
7.27 g
87.7 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
380.18
388.30
8.12 g
80.9 Sand
Medium
#40
425
353.96
365.38
11.42 g
71.3 Sand
Medium
#60
250
351.77
383.90
32.13 g
44.3 Sand
Fine
#80
180
338.40
359.17
20.77 g
26.8 Sand
Fine
#100
150
329.14
338.16
9.02 g
19.2 Sand
Fine
#200
75
323.84
336.10
12.26 g
8.9 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
8.9
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
119
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) °/
'o Finer Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0070
22.5
35.6
4.56 Silt
5
5
1.0065
22.5
22.6
3.88 Silt
15
15
1.0060
22.5
13.1
3.21 Silt
30
30
1.0055
22.5
9.3
2.53 Silt
60
58
1.0050
22.5
6.7
1.86 Silt
250
256
1.0045
20.5
3.3
0.506 Clay
1440
1440
1.0045
20.0
1.4
0.337 Clay
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
6/14/2016
Client Sample ID
HT16-21-SURF-FD
Start Date
06/24/2016 16:07
Lab Sample ID
200-33945-D-18
End Date
07/02/2016 11:48
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
plant,wood,shell
Tin Weight
4.20 g
Shape (>#10):
subangular
Wet Sample + Tin
165.42 g
Hardness (> #10):
hard
Dry Sample + Tin
125.69 g
% Moisture
24.64 %
Date/Time in oven
06/24/2016 16:07
Date/Time out of oven
06/25/2016 8:36
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
50.44 250.12
199.68
Serial Number
410848
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
150
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
06/28/2016
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0050
Sample >=#10
23.3
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
127
Reading at High Temp
1.0035
% Passing #10
63.6
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00925
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
447.40
451.43
4.03 g
97.3 Gravel
#4
4750
488.16
495.95
7.79 g
92.1 Gravel
#10
2000
462.85
474.36
11.51 g
84.4 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
380.18
388.51
8.33 g
78.8 Sand
Medium
#40
425
353.96
367.60
13.64 g
69.7 Sand
Medium
#60
250
351.77
392.14
40.37 g
42.8 Sand
Fine
#80
180
338.40
364.03
25.63 g
25.7 Sand
Fine
#100
150
329.14
340.14
11.00 g
18.4 Sand
Fine
#200
75
323.84
339.23
15.39 g
8.1 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
8.1
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
150
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) °/
'o Finer Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0075
22.5
35.4
4.15 Silt
5
5
1.0070
22.5
22.5
3.61 Silt
15
15
1.0065
22.5
13.1
3.08 Silt
30
29
1.0060
22.5
9.4
2.54 Silt
60
58
1.0055
22.5
6.7
2.01 Silt
250
250
1.0050
20.5
3.3
0.937 Clay
1440
1434
1.0045
20.0
1.4
0.268 Clay
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-08-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33967-18
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33959-1
Sdg Number: 33959-1
Date Sampled: 06/13/2016 1605
Date Received: 06/15/2016 1030
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/25/2016 1353
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106468
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33967-D-18.txt
92.66 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (%) Qualifier MDL RL
Gravel 2.7
Sand 28.6
Coarse Sand 2.9
Medium Sand 5.2
Fine Sand 20.5
Silt 34.8
Clay 33.9
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-08-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33967-18
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33959-1
Sdg Number: 33959-1
Date Sampled: 06/13/2016 1605
Date Received: 06/15/2016 1030
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/25/2016 1353
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106468
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33967-D-18.txt
92.66 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (% Passing) Qualifier MDL RL
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
97.3
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
94.4
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
92.1
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
89.2
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
84.1
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
79.4
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
76.4
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
68.7
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
55.2
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
50.9
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
42.4
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
38.1
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
33.9
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
27.5
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
18.9
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-09-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33967-19
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33959-1
Sdg Number: 33959-1
Date Sampled: 06/13/2016 1510
Date Received: 06/15/2016 1030
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/24/2016 1608
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106468
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33967-D-19.txt
180.96 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (%) Qualifier MDL RL
Gravel 8.6
Sand 80.2
Coarse Sand 15.0
Medium Sand 35.8
Fine Sand 29.4
Silt 7.8
Clay 3.4
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-09-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33967-19
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33959-1
Sdg Number: 33959-1
Date Sampled: 06/13/2016 1510
Date Received: 06/15/2016 1030
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/24/2016 1608
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106468
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33967-D-19.txt
180.96 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (% Passing) Qualifier MDL RL
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
97.0
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
91.4
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
76.4
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
58.1
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
40.6
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
24.9
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
17.9
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
15.0
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
11.2
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
7.6
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
6.4
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
4.6
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
4.0
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
3.4
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
1.6
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
0.3
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 6/15/2016
Sample ID: HT16-08-SURF Percent Solids: 81.2% Start Date: 6/25/2016
Lab ID: 200-33967-D-18 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 6/30/2016
Shape (>#10): subrounded Non-soil material: na
Hardness (> #10): hard
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
97.3
2.7
#10
2000
94.4
2.9
#20
850
92.1
2.3
#40
425
89.2
2.9
#60
250
84.1
5.1
#80
180
79.4
4.7
#100
150
76.4
3.0
#200
75
68.7
7.7
Hyd1
28.2
55.2
13.5
Hyd2
18.4
50.9
4.3
Hyd3
11.2
42.4
8.5
Hyd4
8.1
38.1
4.3
Hyd5
5.7
33.9
4.2
Hyd6
3
27.5
6.4
Hyd7
1.3
18.9
8.6
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
2.7
Sand
28.6
Coarse Sand
2.9
Medium Sand
5.2
Fine Sand
20.5
Silt
34.8
Clay
33.9
TestAmerica Burlington
200-33967-D-18 6/30/2016
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 6/15/2016
Sample ID: HT16-09-SURF Percent Solids: 74.5% Start Date: 6/24/2016
Lab ID: 200-33967-D-19 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 7/2/2016
Shape (>#10): subangular Non-soil material: plant,glass,shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
100000
10000
1000 100
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
Particle
Percent
Incremental
size
size, um
finer
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
97.0
3.0
#4
4750
91.4
5.6
#10
2000
76.4
15.0
#20
850
58.1
18.3
#40
425
40.6
17.5
#60
250
24.9
15.7
#80
180
17.9
7.0
#100
150
15.0
2.9
#200
75
11.2
3.8
Hyd1
34.6
7.6
3.6
Hyd2
22.1
6.4
1.2
Hyd3
12.9
4.6
1.8
Hyd4
9.3
4.0
0.6
Hyd5
6.4
3.4
0.6
Hyd6
3.3
1.6
1.8
Hyd7
1.4
0.3
1.3
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
8.6
Sand
80.2
Coarse Sand
15.0
Medium Sand
35.8
Fine Sand
29.4
Silt
7.8
Clay
3.4
TestAmerica Burlington
200-33967-D-19 7/2/2016
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
6/15/2016
Client Sample ID
HT16-08-SURF
Start Date
06/25/2016 13:53
Lab Sample ID
200-33967-D-18
End Date
06/30/2016 10:03
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
na
Tin Weight
4.20 g
Shape (>#10):
subrounded
Wet Sample + Tin
176.42 g
Hardness (> #10):
hard
Dry Sample + Tin
144.07 g
% Moisture
18.78 %
Date/Time in oven
06/25/2016 13:53
Date/Time out of oven
06/28/2016 10:11
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
50.71 143.37
92.66
Serial Number
426928
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
75.3
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
11/13/2014
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0040
Sample >=#10
4.23
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
71.1
Reading at High Temp
1.0025
% Passing #10
76.7
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00825
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
488.12
490.15
2.03 g
97.3 Gravel
#10
2000
462.79
464.99
2.20 g
94.4 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
389.50
391.21
1.71 g
92.1 Sand
Medium
#40
425
367.76
369.93
2.17 g
89.2 Sand
Medium
#60
250
349.24
353.10
3.86 g
84.1 Sand
Fine
#80
180
331.74
335.30
3.56 g
79.4 Sand
Fine
#100
150
330.76
333.03
2.27 g
76.4 Sand
Fine
#200
75
323.44
329.21
5.77 g
68.7 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
68.7
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
75.3
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0290
20.5
28.2
55.2 Silt
5
5
1.0270
20.5
18.4
50.9 Silt
15
15
1.0230
20.5
11.2
42.4 Silt
30
30
1.0210
20.5
8.1
38.1 Silt
60
63
1.0190
20.5
5.7
33.9 Silt
250
253
1.0160
20.5
3
27.5 Clay
1440
1400
1.0120
20.5
1.3
18.9 Clay
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
6/15/2016
Client Sample ID
HT16-09-SURF
Start Date
06/24/2016 16:08
Lab Sample ID
200-33967-D-19
End Date
07/02/2016 11:58
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
plant,glass,shell
Tin Weight
4.17 g
Shape (>#10):
subangular
Wet Sample + Tin
145.86 g
Hardness (> #10):
hard
Dry Sample + Tin
109.69 g
% Moisture
25.53 %
Date/Time in oven
06/24/2016 16:08
Date/Time out of oven
06/25/2016 8:37
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
57.89 238.85
180.96
Serial Number
410848
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
135
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
06/28/2016
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0050
Sample >=#10
32
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
103
Reading at High Temp
1.0035
% Passing #10
56.9
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00925
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
447.40
451.50
4.10 g
97.0 Gravel
#4
4750
488.16
495.78
7.62 g
91.4 Gravel
#10
2000
462.85
483.10
20.25 g
76.4 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
380.18
404.82
24.64 g
58.1 Sand
Medium
#40
425
353.96
377.58
23.62 g
40.6 Sand
Medium
#60
250
351.77
373.00
21.23 g
24.9 Sand
Fine
#80
180
338.40
347.86
9.46 g
17.9 Sand
Fine
#100
150
329.14
333.09
3.95 g
15.0 Sand
Fine
#200
75
323.84
329.01
5.17 g
11.2 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
11.2
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
135
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) °/
'o Finer Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0100
22.5
34.6
7.58 Silt
5
5
1.0090
22.5
22.1
6.39 Silt
15
15
1.0075
22.5
12.9
4.61 Silt
30
29
1.0070
22.5
9.3
4.02 Silt
60
63
1.0065
22.5
6.4
3.42 Silt
250
250
1.0055
20.5
3.3
1.64 Clay
1440
1434
1.0045
20.0
1.4
0.297 Clay
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-14-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33968-1
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33968-1
Sdg Number: 33968-1
Date Sampled: 06/13/2016 1245
Date Received: 06/15/2016 1030
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/24/2016 1610
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106578
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33968-D-1 .txt
199.88 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (%) Qualifier RL
Gravel 14
Sand 80
Coarse Sand 8.4
Medium Sand 12
Fine Sand 60
Silt 4.9
Clay 1.4
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-14-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33968-1
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33968-1
Sdg Number: 33968-1
Date Sampled: 06/13/2016 1245
Date Received: 06/15/2016 1030
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/24/2016 1610
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106578
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33968-D-1 .txt
199.88 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (% Passing) Qualifier RL
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
96
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
86
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
78
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
73
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
66
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
42
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
25
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
16
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
6.3
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
3.5
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
3.0
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
2.5
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
2.0
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
1.4
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
0.39
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
0.26
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-17-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33968-2
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33968-1
Sdg Number: 33968-1
Date Sampled: 06/13/2016 1110
Date Received: 06/15/2016 1030
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/24/2016 1613
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106578
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33968-D-2.txt
144.05 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (%) Qualifier RL
Gravel 0.00
Sand 15
Coarse Sand 1.1
Medium Sand 1.2
Fine Sand 13
Silt 60
Clay 25
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-17-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33968-2
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33968-1
Sdg Number: 33968-1
Date Sampled: 06/13/2016 1110
Date Received: 06/15/2016 1030
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/24/2016 1613
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106578
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33968-D-2.txt
144.05 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (% Passing) Qualifier RL
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
99
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
99
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
98
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
93
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
90
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
89
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
85
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
50
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
43
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
35
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
30
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
25
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
16
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
9.2
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-17-SURF-FD
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33968-3FD
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33968-1
Sdg Number: 33968-1
Date Sampled: 06/13/2016 1110
Date Received: 06/15/2016 1030
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/24/2016 1615
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106578
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33968-D-3.txt
142.89 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (%) Qualifier RL
Gravel 0.00
Sand 9.8
Coarse Sand 0.80
Medium Sand 1.0
Fine Sand 8.0
Silt 65
Clay 25
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-17-SURF-FD
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33968-3FD
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33968-1
Sdg Number: 33968-1
Date Sampled: 06/13/2016 1110
Date Received: 06/15/2016 1030
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/24/2016 1615
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106578
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33968-D-3.txt
142.89 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (% Passing) Qualifier RL
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
99
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
99
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
98
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
96
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
95
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
94
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
90
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
46
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
41
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
35
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
29
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
25
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
16
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
8.9
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-19-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33968-4
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33968-1
Sdg Number: 33968-1
Date Sampled: 06/13/2016 0935
Date Received: 06/15/2016 1030
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/24/2016 1616
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106578
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33968-D~4.txt
145.06 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (%) Qualifier RL
Gravel 0.00
Sand 6.5
Coarse Sand 3.7
Medium Sand 0.30
Fine Sand 2.5
Silt 74
Clay 20
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-19-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33968-4
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33968-1
Sdg Number: 33968-1
Date Sampled: 06/13/2016 0935
Date Received: 06/15/2016 1030
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/24/2016 1616
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106578
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33968-D~4.txt
145.06 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (% Passing) Qualifier RL
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
96
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
96
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
96
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
96
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
95
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
95
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
94
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
42
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
33
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
26
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
24
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
20
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
11
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
3.4
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-20-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33968-5
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33968-1
Sdg Number: 33968-1
Date Sampled: 06/13/2016 1010
Date Received: 06/15/2016 1030
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/24/2016 1621
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106578
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33968-D-5.txt
166.07 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (%) Qualifier RL
Gravel 1.4
Sand 86
Coarse Sand 2.1
Medium Sand 8.4
Fine Sand 76
Silt 10
Clay 2.1
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-20-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33968-5
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33968-1
Sdg Number: 33968-1
Date Sampled: 06/13/2016 1010
Date Received: 06/15/2016 1030
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/24/2016 1621
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106578
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33968-D-5.txt
166.07 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (% Passing) Qualifier RL
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
99
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
97
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
95
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
88
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
64
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
45
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
34
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
12
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
4.4
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
3.6
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
3.6
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
2.1
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
2.1
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
0.57
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
0.38
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-05-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33984-1
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33968-1
Sdg Number: 33968-1
Date Sampled: 06/14/2016 1425
Date Received: 06/16/2016 0945
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/24/2016 1623
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106471
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33984-D-1 .txt
192.84 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (%) Qualifier RL
Gravel 15
Sand 75
Coarse Sand 7.2
Medium Sand 11
Fine Sand 57
Silt 7.6
Clay 2.1
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-05-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33984-1
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33968-1
Sdg Number: 33968-1
Date Sampled: 06/14/2016 1425
Date Received: 06/16/2016 0945
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/24/2016 1623
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106471
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33984-D-1 .txt
192.84 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (% Passing) Qualifier RL
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
95
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
85
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
78
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
73
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
67
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
52
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
32
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
23
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
9.7
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
5.2
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
5.2
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
3.6
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
2.9
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
2.1
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
0.57
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
0.38
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-06-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33984-2
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33968-1
Sdg Number: 33968-1
Date Sampled: 06/14/2016 1315
Date Received: 06/16/2016 0945
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/24/2016 1624
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106471
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33984-D-2.txt
206.71 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (%) Qualifier RL
Gravel 6.0
Sand 87
Coarse Sand 7.3
Medium Sand 40
Fine Sand 40
Silt 6.8
Clay 0.40
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-06-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33984-2
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33968-1
Sdg Number: 33968-1
Date Sampled: 06/14/2016 1315
Date Received: 06/16/2016 0945
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/24/2016 1624
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106471
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33984-D-2.txt
206.71 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (% Passing) Qualifier RL
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
94
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
87
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
76
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
47
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
12
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
8.3
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
7.7
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
7.2
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
0.40
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
0.40
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
0.40
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
0.40
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
0.40
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
-0.13
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
-0.26
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-07-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33984-3
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33968-1
Sdg Number: 33968-1
Date Sampled: 06/14/2016 1230
Date Received: 06/16/2016 0945
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/24/2016 1625
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106471
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33984-D-3.txt
192.87 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (%) Qualifier RL
Gravel 49
Sand 39
Coarse Sand 16
Medium Sand 9.5
Fine Sand 13
Silt 11
Clay 0.99
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-07-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33984-3
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33968-1
Sdg Number: 33968-1
Date Sampled: 06/14/2016 1230
Date Received: 06/16/2016 0945
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/24/2016 1625
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106471
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33984-D-3.txt
192.87 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (% Passing) Qualifier RL
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
69
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
51
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
35
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
31
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
25
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
20
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
16
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
14
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
12
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
1.6
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
1.6
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
0.99
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
0.99
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
0.99
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
0.42
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
0.28
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-28-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33984-7
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33968-1
Sdg Number: 33968-1
Date Sampled: 06/14/2016 1620
Date Received: 06/16/2016 0945
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/25/2016 1355
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106471
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33984-D-7.txt
141.71 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (%) Qualifier RL
Gravel 0.00
Sand 2.5
Coarse Sand 0.00
Medium Sand 1.0
Fine Sand 1.5
Silt 74
Clay 24
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-28-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33984-7
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33968-1
Sdg Number: 33968-1
Date Sampled: 06/14/2016 1620
Date Received: 06/16/2016 0945
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/25/2016 1355
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106471
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33984-D-7.txt
141.71 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (% Passing) Qualifier RL
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
99
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
99
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
99
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
99
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
98
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
98
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
58
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
44
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
37
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
27
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
24
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
13
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
9.8
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-31-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33984-8
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33968-1
Sdg Number: 33968-1
Date Sampled: 06/14/2016 1715
Date Received: 06/16/2016 0945
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/25/2016 1356
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106471
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33984-D-8.txt
219.02 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (%) Qualifier RL
Gravel 32
Sand 63
Coarse Sand 9.8
Medium Sand 8.8
Fine Sand 44
Silt 3.6
Clay 1.1
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-31-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33984-8
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33968-1
Sdg Number: 33968-1
Date Sampled: 06/14/2016 1715
Date Received: 06/16/2016 0945
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/25/2016 1356
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106471
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33984-D-8.txt
219.02 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (% Passing) Qualifier RL
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
91
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
68
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
58
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
55
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
49
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
37
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
21
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
13
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
4.8
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
3.7
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
3.1
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
2.4
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
2.4
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
1.1
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
1.1
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
1.1
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-32-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33984-9
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33968-1
Sdg Number: 33968-1
Date Sampled: 06/14/2016 1705
Date Received: 06/16/2016 0945
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/25/2016 1357
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106471
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33984-D-9.txt
180.05 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (%) Qualifier RL
Gravel 13
Sand 75
Coarse Sand 12
Medium Sand 14
Fine Sand 50
Silt 9.7
Clay 2.3
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-32-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33984-9
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33968-1
Sdg Number: 33968-1
Date Sampled: 06/14/2016 1705
Date Received: 06/16/2016 0945
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/25/2016 1357
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106471
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33984-D-9.txt
180.05 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (% Passing) Qualifier RL
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
94
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
87
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
75
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
69
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
61
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
51
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
40
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
30
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
12
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
4.6
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
4.6
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
3.5
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
2.9
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
2.3
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
1.1
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
1.1
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-13-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33984-13
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33968-1
Sdg Number: 33968-1
Date Sampled: 06/13/2016 1320
Date Received: 06/16/2016 0945
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/28/2016 1243
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106471
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33984-D-13.txt
158 01 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (%) Qualifier RL
Gravel 0.00
Sand 39
Coarse Sand 1.6
Medium Sand 7.0
Fine Sand 30
Silt 53
Clay 8.4
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-13-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33984-13
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33968-1
Sdg Number: 33968-1
Date Sampled: 06/13/2016 1320
Date Received: 06/16/2016 0945
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/28/2016 1243
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106471
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33984-D-13.txt
158 01 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (% Passing) Qualifier RL
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
98
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
97
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
91
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
85
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
81
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
77
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
61
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
18
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
12
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
10
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
9.2
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
8.4
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
4.1
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
1.9
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-15-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33984-14
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33968-1
Sdg Number: 33968-1
Date Sampled: 06/13/2016 1150
Date Received: 06/16/2016 0945
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/28/2016 1244
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106471
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33984-D-14.txt
165.67 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (%) Qualifier RL
Gravel 0.00
Sand 57
Coarse Sand 1.6
Medium Sand 5.6
Fine Sand 50
Silt 29
Clay 14
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-15-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-33984-14
Sediment
Job Number: 200-33968-1
Sdg Number: 33968-1
Date Sampled: 06/13/2016 1150
Date Received: 06/16/2016 0945
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/28/2016 1244
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106471
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-33984-D-14.txt
165.67 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (% Passing) Qualifier RL
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
100
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
98
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
97
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
93
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
84
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
71
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
65
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
43
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
38
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
24
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
21
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
18
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
14
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
10
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
5.4
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 6/15/2016
Sample ID: HT16-14-SURF Percent Solids: 77.0% Start Date: 6/24/2016
Lab ID: 200-33968-D-1 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 7/2/2016
Shape (>#10): subrounded Non-soil material: plant,shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
95.8
4.2
#4
4750
86.1
9.7
#10
2000
77.7
8.4
#20
850
73.1
4.6
#40
425
66.2
6.9
#60
250
42.4
23.8
#80
180
25.1
17.3
#100
150
16.4
8.7
#200
75
6.3
10.1
Hyd1
35.6
3.5
2.8
Hyd2
22.6
3.0
0.5
Hyd3
13.1
2.5
0.5
Hyd4
9.2
2.0
0.5
Hyd5
6.6
1.4
0.5
Hyd6
3.4
0.4
1.0
Hyd7
1.4
0.3
0.1
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
13.9
Sand
79.8
Coarse Sand
8.4
Medium Sand
11.5
Fine Sand
59.9
Silt
4.9
Clay
1.4
TestAmerica Burlington
200-33968-D-1 7/2/2016
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 6/15/2016
Sample ID: HT16-17-SURF Percent Solids: 33.3% Start Date: 6/24/2016
Lab ID: 200-33968-D-2 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 7/2/2016
Shape (> #10): jia Non-soil material: plant,shell
Hardness (> #10): _na
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
Particle
Percent
Incremental
size
size, um
finer
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
100.0
0.0
#10
2000
98.9
1.1
#20
850
98.5
0.4
#40
425
97.7
0.8
#60
250
92.6
5.1
#80
180
89.9
2.7
#100
150
88.9
1.0
#200
75
85.0
3.9
Hyd1
31.6
49.9
35.1
Hyd2
20.5
43.2
6.7
Hyd3
12.1
34.8
8.4
Hyd4
8.6
29.8
5.0
Hyd5
6.3
24.7
5.1
Hyd6
3.3
16.3
8.4
Hyd7
1.4
9.2
7.1
TestAmerica Burlington
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
0.0
Sand
15.0
Coarse Sand
1.1
Medium Sand
1.2
Fine Sand
12.7
Silt
60.3
Clay
24.7
200-33968-D-2 7/2/2016
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 6/15/2016
Sample ID: HT16-17-SURF-FD Percent Solids: 35.0% Start Date: 6/24/2016
Lab ID: 200-33968-D-3 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 7/2/2016
— — — — — I- 0
100000 10000 1000 100 10 1
Particle Size, microns (um)
Shape (> #10): na Non-soil material: plant,shell
Hardness (> #10): na
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
100.0
0.0
#10
2000
99.2
0.8
#20
850
98.8
0.4
#40
425
98.2
0.6
#60
250
96.2
2.0
#80
180
94.6
1.6
#100
150
93.7
0.9
#200
75
90.2
3.5
Hyd1
31.8
46.3
43.9
Hyd2
20.5
41.4
4.9
Hyd3
12.1
35.0
6.4
Hyd4
8.6
28.6
6.4
Hyd5
6.3
25.3
3.3
Hyd6
3.1
15.7
9.6
Hyd7
1.4
8.9
6.9
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
0.0
Sand
9.8
Coarse Sand
0.8
Medium Sand
1.0
Fine Sand
8.0
Silt
64.9
Clay
25.3
TestAmerica Burlington
200-33968-D-3 7/2/2016
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 6/15/2016
Sample ID: HT16-19-SURF Percent Solids: 24.8% Start Date: 6/24/2016
Lab ID: 200-33968-D-4 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 7/2/2016
100000
10000
1000 100
Particle Size, microns (um)
Shape (> #10): na Non-soil material: plant,shell
Hardness (> #10): na
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
100.0
0.0
#10
2000
96.3
3.7
#20
850
96.1
0.2
#40
425
96.0
0.1
#60
250
95.6
0.4
#80
180
95.3
0.3
#100
150
95.1
0.2
#200
75
93.5
1.6
Hyd1
33.6
41.8
51.7
Hyd2
21.7
32.9
8.9
Hyd3
12.7
26.2
6.7
Hyd4
8.7
24.0
2.2
Hyd5
6.4
19.5
4.5
Hyd6
3.2
10.6
8.9
Hyd7
1.4
3.4
7.3
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
0.0
Sand
6.5
Coarse Sand
3.7
Medium Sand
0.3
Fine Sand
2.5
Silt
74.0
Clay
19.5
TestAmerica Burlington
200-33968-D-4 7/2/2016
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 6/15/2016
Sample ID: HT16-20-SURF Percent Solids: 64.0% Start Date: 6/24/2016
Lab ID: 200-33968-D-5 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 7/2/2016
Shape (>#10): subrounded Non-soil material: plant,shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
Particle
Percent
Incremental
size
size, um
finer
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
98.6
1.4
#10
2000
96.5
2.1
#20
850
94.7
1.8
#40
425
88.1
6.6
#60
250
64.3
23.8
#80
180
45.2
19.1
#100
150
33.9
11.3
#200
75
12.2
21.7
Hyd1
35.7
4.4
7.8
Hyd2
22.7
3.6
0.8
Hyd3
13.1
3.6
0.0
Hyd4
9.4
2.1
1.5
Hyd5
6.5
2.1
0.0
Hyd6
3.3
0.6
1.5
Hyd7
1.4
0.4
0.2
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
1.4
Sand
86.4
Coarse Sand
2.1
Medium Sand
8.4
Fine Sand
75.9
Silt
10.1
Clay
2.1
TestAmerica Burlington
200-33968-D-5 7/2/2016
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 6/16/2016
Sample ID: HT16-05-SURF Percent Solids: 54.3% Start Date: S'24/2016
Lab ID: 200-33984-D-1 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 7/2/2016
Shape (> #10): sutxounded Non-soil material: plant,shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
95.0
5.0
#4
4750
84.8
10.2
#10
2000
77.6
7.2
#20
850
72.9
4.7
#40
425
66.7
6.2
#60
250
52.0
14.7
#80
180
32.4
19.6
#100
150
23.4
9.0
#200
75
9.7
13.7
Hyd1
35.6
5.2
4.5
Hyd2
22.5
5.2
0.0
Hyd3
13.1
3.6
1.5
Hyd4
9.3
2.9
0.8
Hyd5
6.8
2.1
0.8
Hyd6
3.4
0.6
1.5
Hyd7
1.4
0.4
0.2
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
15.2
Sand
75.1
Coarse Sand
7.2
Medium Sand
10.9
Fine Sand
57.0
Silt
7.6
Clay
2.1
TestAmerica Burlington
200-33984-D-1 7/2/2016
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 6/16/2016
Sample ID: HT16-06-SURF Percent Solids: 73.5% Start Date: S'24/2016
Lab ID: 200-33984-D-2 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 7/2/2016
Shape (> #10): subrounded
Non-soil material: plant,shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
\
\
v
\
\
V
V
*
\
\
\
V
>>0-0
V
m—
—
0l
10000
1000 100
Particle Size, microns (um)
10
Sieve
Particle
Percent
Incremental
size
size, um
finer
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
94.0
6.0
#10
2000
86.7
7.3
#20
850
76.2
10.5
#40
425
47.1
29.1
#60
250
12.2
34.9
#80
180
8.3
3.9
#100
150
7.7
0.5
#200
75
7.2
0.5
Hyd1
36.5
0.4
6.8
Hyd2
23.1
0.4
0.0
Hyd3
13.3
0.4
0.0
Hyd4
9.4
0.4
0.0
Hyd5
6.5
0.4
0.0
Hyd6
3.4
-0.1
0.5
Hyd7
1.4
-0.3
0.1
TestAmerica Burlington
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
6.0
Sand
86.8
Coarse Sand
7.3
Medium Sand
39.6
Fine Sand
39.9
Silt
6.8
Clay
0.4
200-33984-D-2 7/2/2016
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 6/16/2016
Sample ID: HT16-07-SURF Percent Solids: 73.4% Start Date: 6/24/2016
Lab ID: 200-33984-D-3 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 7/2/2016
Shape (>#10): subrounded Non-soil material: plant,shell,glass
Hardness (> #10): hard
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
Particle
Percent
Incremental
size
size, um
finer
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
68.6
31.4
#4
4750
50.7
17.9
#10
2000
34.8
15.9
#20
850
30.5
4.3
#40
425
25.3
5.2
#60
250
19.7
5.6
#80
180
16.2
3.5
#100
150
14.4
1.8
#200
75
12.0
2.4
Hyd1
36.2
1.6
10.4
Hyd2
22.9
1.6
0.0
Hyd3
13.3
1.0
0.6
Hyd4
9.2
1.0
0.0
Hyd5
6.8
1.0
0.0
Hyd6
3.4
0.4
0.6
Hyd7
1.4
0.3
0.1
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
49.3
Sand
38.7
Coarse Sand
15.9
Medium Sand
9.5
Fine Sand
13.3
Silt
11.0
Clay
1.0
TestAmerica Burlington
200-33984-D-3 7/2/2016
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 6/16/2016
Sample ID: HT16-28-SURF Percent Solids: 33.2% Start Date: 6/25/2016
Lab ID: 200-33984-D-7 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 6/30/2016
Shape (> #10): jia Non-soil material: na
Hardness (> #10): na
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
Particle
Percent
Incremental
size
size, um
finer
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
100.0
0.0
#10
2000
100.0
0.0
#20
850
99.4
0.6
#40
425
99.0
0.4
#60
250
98.7
0.3
#80
180
98.6
0.1
#100
150
98.4
0.2
#200
75
97.5
0.9
Hyd1
31.8
57.7
39.8
Hyd2
21.1
44.0
13.7
Hyd3
12.4
37.2
6.8
Hyd4
9.1
26.9
10.3
Hyd5
6.6
23.5
3.4
Hyd6
3.3
13.2
10.3
Hyd7
1.4
9.8
3.4
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
0.0
Sand
2.5
Coarse Sand
0.0
Medium Sand
1.0
Fine Sand
1.5
Silt
74.0
Clay
23.5
TestAmerica Burlington
200-33984-D-7 6/30/2016
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Sample ID:
Lab ID:"
HT16-31-SURF
200-33984-D-8
Percent Solids: 57.1%
Specific Gravity: 2.650
Date Received:
Start Date:
End Date:
6/16/2016
6/25/2016
6/30/2016
Shape (> #10): subangular
Non-soil material: shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
¦0—
—0-
0
>-
0-
-0-
0
100
90
80
70 „
¦E
g>
60 %
>
-Q
50
c
U—
40 c
u
30 a.
20
10
100000
10000
1000 100
Particle Size, microns (um)
10
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
91.3
8.7
#4
4750
67.6
23.7
#10
2000
57.8
9.8
#20
850
54.5
3.3
#40
425
49.0
5.5
#60
250
37.0
12.0
#80
180
20.5
16.5
#100
150
12.7
7.8
#200
75
4.8
7.9
Hyd1
36.8
3.7
1.1
Hyd2
23.4
3.1
0.6
Hyd3
13.6
2.4
0.6
Hyd4
9.6
2.4
0.0
Hyd5
6.7
1.1
1.3
Hyd6
3.4
1.1
0.0
Hyd7
1.4
1.1
0.0
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
32.4
Sand
62.8
Coarse Sand
9.8
Medium Sand
00
00
Fine Sand
44.2
Silt
3.6
Clay
1.1
TestAmerica Burlington
200-33984-D-8
6/30/2016
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 6/16/2016
Sample ID: HT16-32-SURF Percent Solids: 74.5% Start Date: S'25/2016
Lab ID: 200-33984-D-9 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 6/30/2016
Shape (> #10): subangular Non-soil material: shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
94.3
5.7
#4
4750
87.2
7.1
#10
2000
75.3
11.9
#20
850
68.8
6.5
#40
425
61.4
7.4
#60
250
51.1
10.3
#80
180
40.1
11.0
#100
150
30.3
9.8
#200
75
11.9
18.4
Hyd1
36.5
4.6
7.3
Hyd2
23.1
4.6
0.0
Hyd3
13.4
3.5
1.2
Hyd4
9.4
2.9
0.6
Hyd5
7
2.3
0.6
Hyd6
3.5
1.1
1.2
Hyd7
1.4
1.1
0.0
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
12.8
Sand
75.3
Coarse Sand
11.9
Medium Sand
13.9
Fine Sand
49.5
Silt
9.7
Clay
2.3
TestAmerica Burlington
200-33984-D-9 6/30/2016
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 6/16/2016
Sample ID: HT16-13-SURF Percent Solids: 61.9% Start Date: 6/28/2016
Lab ID: 200-33984-D-13 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 7/1/2016
Shape (> #10): na Non-soil material: plant,shell
Hardness (> #10): na
100000
10000
1000 100
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
100.0
0.0
#10
2000
98.4
1.6
#20
850
96.5
1.9
#40
425
91.4
5.1
#60
250
84.9
6.5
#80
180
80.5
4.4
#100
150
76.8
3.7
#200
75
61.4
15.4
Hyd1
33.6
18.3
43.1
Hyd2
22.1
11.7
6.6
Hyd3
12.9
10.1
1.6
Hyd4
9
9.2
0.9
Hyd5
6.6
8.4
0.8
Hyd6
3.2
4.1
4.3
Hyd7
1.4
1.9
2.3
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
0.0
Sand
38.6
Coarse Sand
1.6
Medium Sand
7.0
Fine Sand
30.0
Silt
53.0
Clay
8.4
TestAmerica Burlington
200-33984-D-13 7/1/2016
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Sample ID:
Lab ID:"
HT16-15-SURF
200-33984-D-14
Percent Solids:
Specific Gravity:
38.3%
2.650
Date Received:
Start Date:
End Date:
6/16/2016
6/28/2016
7/1/2016
Shape (> #10): subrounded
Non-soil material: plant
Hardness (> #10): hard
—
y
V
\
\
\
\
100
90
80
70 „
¦E
g>
60 %
>
-Q
50
c
U—
40 c
u
30 a.
20
10
100000
10000
1000 100
Particle Size, microns (um)
10
Sieve
Particle
Percent
Incremental
size
size, um
finer
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
100.0
0.0
#10
2000
98.4
1.6
#20
850
97.1
1.3
#40
425
92.8
4.3
#60
250
83.8
9.0
#80
180
71.3
12.5
#100
150
64.8
6.5
#200
75
43.0
21.8
Hyd1
32.2
38.3
4.7
Hyd2
21.6
24.4
13.9
Hyd3
12.7
20.6
3.8
Hyd4
oo
00
18.0
2.6
Hyd5
6.5
14.2
3.8
Hyd6
3.2
10.1
4.1
Hyd7
1.4
5.4
4.7
TestAmerica Burlington
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
0.0
Sand
57.0
Coarse Sand
1.6
Medium Sand
5.6
Fine Sand
49.8
Silt
28.8
Clay
14.2
200-33984-D-14 7/1/2016
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
6/15/2016
Client Sample ID
HT16-14-SURF
Start Date
06/24/2016 16:10
Lab Sample ID
200-33968-D-1
End Date
07/02/2016 12:09
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
plant,shell
Tin Weight
4.23 g
Shape (>#10):
subrounded
Wet Sample + Tin
135.44 g
Hardness (> #10):
hard
Dry Sample + Tin
105.20 g
% Moisture
23.05 %
Date/Time in oven
06/24/2016 16:10
Date/Time out of oven
06/25/2016 8:37
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
58.06 257.94
199.88
Serial Number
410848
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
154
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
06/28/2016
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0050
Sample >=#10
34.4
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
120
Reading at High Temp
1.0035
% Passing #10
60
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00925
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
447.40
453.93
6.53 g
95.8 Gravel
#4
4750
488.16
503.13
14.97 g
86.1 Gravel
#10
2000
462.85
475.72
12.87 g
77.7 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
380.18
387.22
7.04 g
73.1 Sand
Medium
#40
425
353.96
364.58
10.62 g
66.2 Sand
Medium
#60
250
351.77
388.38
36.61 g
42.4 Sand
Fine
#80
180
338.40
365.10
26.70 g
25.1 Sand
Fine
#100
150
329.14
342.48
13.34 g
16.4 Sand
Fine
#200
75
323.84
339.43
15.59 g
6.3 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
6.3
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
154
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) °/
'o Finer Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0070
22.5
35.6
3.52 Silt
5
5
1.0065
22.5
22.6
3 Silt
15
15
1.0060
22.5
13.1
2.48 Silt
30
31
1.0055
22.5
9.2
1.96 Silt
60
60
1.0050
22.5
6.6
1.43 Silt
250
240
1.0045
20.5
3.4
0.391 Clay
1440
1424
1.0045
20.0
1.4
0.261 Clay
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
6/15/2016
Client Sample ID
HT16-17-SURF
Start Date
06/24/2016 16:13
Lab Sample ID
200-33968-D-2
End Date
07/02/2016 12:19
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
plant,shell
Tin Weight
4.52 g
Shape (>#10):
na
Wet Sample + Tin
132.46 g
Hardness (> #10):
na
Dry Sample + Tin
47.07 g
% Moisture
66.74 %
Date/Time in oven
06/24/2016 16:13
Date/Time out of oven
06/25/2016 8:37
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
47.81 191.86
144.05
Serial Number
410848
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
47.9
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
06/28/2016
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0050
Sample >=#10
0.52
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
47.4
Reading at High Temp
1.0035
% Passing #10
32.9
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00925
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#10
2000
462.85
463.37
0.52 g
98.9 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
380.18
380.38
0.20 g
98.5 Sand
Medium
#40
425
353.96
354.35
0.39 g
97.7 Sand
Medium
#60
250
351.77
354.20
2.43 g
92.6 Sand
Fine
#80
180
338.40
339.71
1.31 g
89.9 Sand
Fine
#100
150
329.14
329.63
0.49 g
88.9 Sand
Fine
#200
75
323.84
325.72
1.88 g
85.0 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
85.0
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
47.9
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0185
22.5
31.6
49.9 Silt
5
5
1.0165
22.5
20.5
43.2 Silt
15
15
1.0140
22.5
12.1
34.8 Silt
30
31
1.0125
22.5
8.6
29.8 Silt
60
59
1.0110
22.5
6.3
24.7 Silt
250
234
1.0090
20.5
3.3
16.3 Clay
1440
1418
1.0070
20.0
1.4
9.22 Clay
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
6/15/2016
Client Sample ID
HT16-17-SURF-FD
Start Date
06/24/2016 16:15
Lab Sample ID
200-33968-D-3
End Date
07/02/2016 11:28
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
plant,shell
Tin Weight
4.23 g
Shape (>#10):
na
Wet Sample + Tin
139.23 g
Hardness (> #10):
na
Dry Sample + Tin
51.42 g
% Moisture
65.04 %
Date/Time in oven
06/24/2016 16:15
Date/Time out of oven
06/25/2016 8:38
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
47.75 190.64
142.89
Serial Number
410848
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
49.9
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
06/28/2016
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0050
Sample >=#10
0.42
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
49.5
Reading at High Temp
1.0035
% Passing #10
34.6
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00925
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#10
2000
462.85
463.27
0.42 g
99.2 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
389.45
389.65
0.20 g
98.8 Sand
Medium
#40
425
367.34
367.66
0.32 g
98.2 Sand
Medium
#60
250
348.97
349.98
1.01 g
96.2 Sand
Fine
#80
180
331.58
332.37
0.79 g
94.6 Sand
Fine
#100
150
330.72
331.17
0.45 g
93.7 Sand
Fine
#200
75
323.32
325.06
1.74 g
90.2 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
90.2
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
49.9
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0180
22.5
31.8
46.3 Silt
5
5
1.0165
22.5
20.5
41.4 Silt
15
15
1.0145
22.5
12.1
35 Silt
30
31
1.0125
22.5
8.6
28.6 Silt
60
59
1.0115
22.5
6.3
25.3 Silt
250
265
1.0090
20.5
3.1
15.7 Clay
1440
1412
1.0070
20.0
1.4
8.85 Clay
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
6/15/2016
Client Sample ID
HT16-19-SURF
Start Date
06/24/2016 16:16
Lab Sample ID
200-33968-D-4
End Date
07/02/2016 11:39
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
plant,shell
Tin Weight
4.45 g
Shape (>#10):
na
Wet Sample + Tin
136.83 g
Hardness (> #10):
na
Dry Sample + Tin
37.26 g
% Moisture
75.22 %
Date/Time in oven
06/24/2016 16:16
Date/Time out of oven
06/25/2016 8:38
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
50.72 195.78
145.06
Serial Number
410848
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
36
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
06/28/2016
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0050
Sample >=#10
1.33
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
34.7
Reading at High Temp
1.0035
% Passing #10
23.9
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00925
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#10
2000
462.85
464.18
1.33 g
96.3 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
389.45
389.52
0.07 g
96.1 Sand
Medium
#40
425
367.34
367.39
0.05 g
96.0 Sand
Medium
#60
250
348.97
349.11
0.14 g
95.6 Sand
Fine
#80
180
331.58
331.67
0.09 g
95.3 Sand
Fine
#100
150
330.72
330.81
0.09 g
95.1 Sand
Fine
#200
75
323.32
323.88
0.56 g
93.5 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
93.5
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
36
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0130
22.5
33.6
41.8 Silt
5
5
1.0110
22.5
21.7
32.9 Silt
15
15
1.0095
22.5
12.7
26.2 Silt
30
32
1.0090
22.5
8.7
24 Silt
60
60
1.0080
22.5
6.4
19.5 Silt
250
259
1.0065
20.5
3.2
10.6 Clay
1440
1406
1.0050
20.0
1.4
3.35 Clay
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
6/15/2016
Client Sample ID
HT16-20-SURF
Start Date
06/24/2016 16:21
Lab Sample ID
200-33968-D-5
End Date
07/02/2016 11:49
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
plant,shell
Tin Weight
4.29 g
Shape (>#10):
subrounded
Wet Sample + Tin
176.56 g
Hardness (> #10):
hard
Dry Sample + Tin
114.48 g
% Moisture
36.04 %
Date/Time in oven
06/24/2016 16:21
Date/Time out of oven
06/25/2016 8:37
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
57.74 223.81
166.07
Serial Number
410848
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
106
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
06/28/2016
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0050
Sample >=#10
3.65
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
102
Reading at High Temp
1.0035
% Passing #10
61.4
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00925
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
488.16
489.61
1.45 g
98.6 Gravel
#10
2000
462.85
465.05
2.20 g
96.5 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
389.45
391.38
1.93 g
94.7 Sand
Medium
#40
425
367.34
374.37
7.03 g
88.1 Sand
Medium
#60
250
348.97
374.25
25.28 g
64.3 Sand
Fine
#80
180
331.58
351.84
20.26 g
45.2 Sand
Fine
#100
150
330.72
342.66
11.94 g
33.9 Sand
Fine
#200
75
323.32
346.33
23.01 g
12.2 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
12.2
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
106
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) °/
'o Finer Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0065
22.5
35.7
4.36 Silt
5
5
1.0060
22.5
22.7
3.6 Silt
15
15
1.0060
22.5
13.1
3.6 Silt
30
30
1.0050
22.5
9.4
2.08 Silt
60
63
1.0050
22.5
6.5
2.08 Silt
250
253
1.0045
20.5
3.3
0.568 Clay
1440
1400
1.0045
20.0
1.4
0.379 Clay
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
6/16/2016
Client Sample ID
HT16-05-SURF
Start Date
06/24/2016 16:23
Lab Sample ID
200-33984-D-1
End Date
07/02/2016 11:59
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
plant,shell
Tin Weight
4.35 g
Shape (>#10):
subrounded
Wet Sample + Tin
123.25 g
Hardness (> #10):
hard
Dry Sample + Tin
68.91 g
% Moisture
45.70 %
Date/Time in oven
06/24/2016 16:23
Date/Time out of oven
06/25/2016 8:39
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
46.04 238.88
192.84
Serial Number
410848
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
105
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
06/28/2016
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0050
Sample >=#10
23.5
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
81.5
Reading at High Temp
1.0035
% Passing #10
42.3
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00925
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
447.40
452.68
5.28 g
95.0 Gravel
#4
4750
488.16
498.83
10.67 g
84.8 Gravel
#10
2000
462.85
470.43
7.58 g
77.6 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
389.45
394.39
4.94 g
72.9 Sand
Medium
#40
425
367.34
373.84
6.50 g
66.7 Sand
Medium
#60
250
348.97
364.39
15.42 g
52.0 Sand
Fine
#80
180
331.58
352.18
20.60 g
32.4 Sand
Fine
#100
150
330.72
340.12
9.40 g
23.4 Sand
Fine
#200
75
323.32
337.75
14.43 g
9.7 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
9.7
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
105
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) °/
'o Finer Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0070
22.5
35.6
5.16 Silt
5
5
1.0070
22.5
22.5
5.16 Silt
15
15
1.0060
22.5
13.1
3.63 Silt
30
30
1.0055
22.5
9.3
2.87 Silt
60
57
1.0050
22.5
6.8
2.1 Silt
250
247
1.0045
20.5
3.4
0.574 Clay
1440
1394
1.0045
20.0
1.4
0.382 Clay
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
6/16/2016
Client Sample ID
HT16-06-SURF
Start Date
06/24/2016 16:24
Lab Sample ID
200-33984-D-2
End Date
07/02/2016 12:09
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
plant,shell
Tin Weight
4.37 g
Shape (>#10):
subrounded
Wet Sample + Tin
185.91 g
Hardness (> #10):
hard
Dry Sample + Tin
137.86 g
% Moisture
26.47 %
Date/Time in oven
06/24/2016 16:24
Date/Time out of oven
06/25/2016 8:39
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
57.71 264.42
206.71
Serial Number
410848
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
152
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
06/28/2016
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0050
Sample >=#10
20.4
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
132
Reading at High Temp
1.0035
% Passing #10
63.9
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00925
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
488.16
497.35
9.19 g
94.0 Gravel
#10
2000
462.85
474.01
11.16 g
86.7 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
389.45
405.37
15.92 g
76.2 Sand
Medium
#40
425
367.34
411.59
44.25 g
47.1 Sand
Medium
#60
250
348.97
402.00
53.03 g
12.2 Sand
Fine
#80
180
331.58
337.54
5.96 g
8.3 Sand
Fine
#100
150
330.72
331.56
0.84 g
7.7 Sand
Fine
#200
75
323.32
324.16
0.84 g
7.2 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
7.2
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
152
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) °/
'o Finer Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0040
22.5
36.5
0.396 Silt
5
5
1.0040
22.5
23.1
0.396 Silt
15
15
1.0040
22.5
13.3
0.396 Silt
30
30
1.0040
22.5
9.4
0.396 Silt
60
63
1.0040
22.5
6.5
0.396 Silt
250
241
1.0040
20.5
3.4
-0.132 Clay
1440
1388
1.0040
20.0
1.4
-0.264 Clay
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
6/16/2016
Client Sample ID
HT16-07-SURF
Start Date
06/24/2016 16:25
Lab Sample ID
200-33984-D-3
End Date
07/02/2016 12:20
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
plant,shell,glass
Tin Weight
4.27 g
Shape (>#10):
subrounded
Wet Sample + Tin
152.20 g
Hardness (> #10):
hard
Dry Sample + Tin
112.87 g
% Moisture
26.59 %
Date/Time in oven
06/24/2016 16:25
Date/Time out of oven
06/25/2016 8:40
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
46.14 239.01
192.87
Serial Number
410848
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
142
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
06/28/2016
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0050
Sample >=#10
92.6
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
49.4
Reading at High Temp
1.0035
% Passing #10
25.6
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00925
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
447.40
492.01
44.61 g
68.6 Gravel
#4
4750
488.16
513.52
25.36 g
50.7 Gravel
#10
2000
462.85
485.46
22.61 g
34.8 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
389.45
395.58
6.13 g
30.5 Sand
Medium
#40
425
367.34
374.66
7.32 g
25.3 Sand
Medium
#60
250
348.97
356.92
7.95 g
19.7 Sand
Fine
#80
180
331.58
336.56
4.98 g
16.2 Sand
Fine
#100
150
330.72
333.29
2.57 g
14.4 Sand
Fine
#200
75
323.32
326.69
3.37 g
12.0 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
12.0
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
142
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) °/
'o Finer Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0050
22.5
36.2
1.56 Silt
5
5
1.0050
22.5
22.9
1.56 Silt
15
15
1.0045
22.5
13.3
0.99 Silt
30
31
1.0045
22.5
9.2
0.99 Silt
60
57
1.0045
22.5
6.8
0.99 Silt
250
235
1.0045
20.5
3.4
0.424 Clay
1440
1382
1.0045
20.0
1.4
0.283 Clay
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
6/16/2016
Client Sample ID
HT16-28-SURF
Start Date
06/25/2016 13:55
Lab Sample ID
200-33984-D-7
End Date
06/30/2016 10:38
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material: na
Tin Weight
4.26 g
Shape (>#10): na
Wet Sample + Tin
159.67 g
Hardness (> #10): na
Dry Sample + Tin
55.84 g
% Moisture
66.81 %
Date/Time in oven
06/25/2016 13:55
Date/Time out of oven
06/28/2016 10:10
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
51.41 193.12
141.71
Serial Number
426928
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
47
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
11/13/2014
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0040
Sample >=#10
0
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
47
Reading at High Temp
1.0025
% Passing #10
33.2
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00825
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (urn)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#10
2000
0.00 g
100.0 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
389.50
389.79
0.29 g
99.4 Sand
Medium
#40
425
367.76
367.96
0.20 g
99.0 Sand
Medium
#60
250
349.24
349.37
0.13 g
98.7 Sand
Fine
#80
180
331.74
331.79
0.05 g
98.6 Sand
Fine
#100
150
330.76
330.84
0.08 g
98.4 Sand
Fine
#200
75
323.44
323.84
0.40 g
97.5 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
97.5
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
47
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0200
20.5
31.8
57.7 Silt
5
5
1.0160
20.5
21.1
44 Silt
15
15
1.0140
20.5
12.4
37.2 Silt
30
30
1.0110
20.5
9.1
26.9 Silt
60
57
1.0100
20.5
6.6
23.5 Silt
250
247
1.0070
20.5
3.3
13.2 Clay
1440
1394
1.0060
20.5
1.4
9.82 Clay
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
6/16/2016
Client Sample ID
HT16-31-SURF
Start Date
06/25/2016 13:56
Lab Sample ID
200-33984-D-8
End Date
06/30/2016 11:48
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
shell
Tin Weight
4.29 g
Shape (>#10):
subangular
Wet Sample + Tin
150.90 g
Hardness (> #10):
hard
Dry Sample + Tin
87.93 g
% Moisture
42.95 %
Date/Time in oven
06/25/2016 13:56
Date/Time out of oven
06/28/2016 10:10
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
57.99 277.01
219.02
Serial Number
426928
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
125
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
11/13/2014
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0040
Sample >=#10
52.8
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
72.2
Reading at High Temp
1.0025
% Passing #10
33
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00825
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
447.37
458.26
10.89 g
91.3 Gravel
#4
4750
488.12
517.70
29.58 g
67.6 Gravel
#10
2000
462.79
475.07
12.28 g
57.8 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
389.50
393.58
4.08 g
54.5 Sand
Medium
#40
425
367.76
374.68
6.92 g
49.0 Sand
Medium
#60
250
349.24
364.28
15.04 g
37.0 Sand
Fine
#80
180
331.74
352.41
20.67 g
20.5 Sand
Fine
#100
150
330.76
340.51
9.75 g
12.7 Sand
Fine
#200
75
323.44
333.36
9.92 g
4.8 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
4.8
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
125
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0060
20.5
36.8
3.69 Silt
5
5
1.0055
20.5
23.4
3.05 Silt
15
15
1.0050
20.5
13.6
2.41 Silt
30
30
1.0050
20.5
9.6
2.41 Silt
60
63
1.0040
20.5
6.7
1.12 Silt
250
241
1.0040
20.5
3.4
1.12 Clay
1440
1388
1.0040
20.5
1.4
1.12 Clay
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
6/16/2016
Client Sample ID
HT16-32-SURF
Start Date
06/25/2016 13:57
Lab Sample ID
200-33984-D-9
End Date
06/30/2016 12:08
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
shell
Tin Weight
4.16 g
Shape (>#10):
subangular
Wet Sample + Tin
213.76 g
Hardness (> #10):
hard
Dry Sample + Tin
160.39 g
% Moisture
25.46 %
Date/Time in oven
06/25/2016 13:57
Date/Time out of oven
06/28/2016 10:10
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
50.40 230.45
180.05
Serial Number
426928
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
134
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
11/13/2014
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0040
Sample >=#10
33.1
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
101
Reading at High Temp
1.0025
% Passing #10
56.1
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00825
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
447.37
455.07
7.70 g
94.3 Gravel
#4
4750
488.12
497.59
9.47 g
87.2 Gravel
#10
2000
462.79
478.70
15.91 g
75.3 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
389.50
398.18
8.68 g
68.8 Sand
Medium
#40
425
367.76
377.61
9.85 g
61.4 Sand
Medium
#60
250
349.24
363.01
13.77 g
51.1 Sand
Fine
#80
180
331.74
346.54
14.80 g
40.1 Sand
Fine
#100
150
330.76
343.84
13.08 g
30.3 Sand
Fine
#200
75
323.44
348.14
24.70 g
11.9 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
11.9
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
134
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0070
20.5
36.5
4.64 Silt
5
5
1.0070
20.5
23.1
4.64 Silt
15
15
1.0060
20.5
13.4
3.45 Silt
30
31
1.0055
20.5
9.4
2.85 Silt
60
57
1.0050
20.5
7
2.25 Silt
250
235
1.0040
20.5
3.5
1.05 Clay
1440
1382
1.0040
20.5
1.4
1.05 Clay
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
6/16/2016
Client Sample ID
HT16-13-SURF
Start Date
06/28/2016 12:43
Lab Sample ID
200-33984-D-13
End Date
07/01/2016 12:47
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
plant,shell
Tin Weight
4.35 g
Shape (>#10):
na
Wet Sample + Tin
178.04 g
Hardness (> #10):
na
Dry Sample + Tin
111.89 g
% Moisture
38.09 %
Date/Time in oven
06/28/2016 12:43
Date/Time out of oven
06/29/2016 9:08
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
50.04 208.05
158.01
Serial Number
426928
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
97.8
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
11/13/2014
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0040
Sample >=#10
1.6
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
96.2
Reading at High Temp
1.0025
% Passing #10
60.9
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00825
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#10
2000
462.80
464.40
1.60 g
98.4 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
389.42
391.23
1.81 g
96.5 Sand
Medium
#40
425
367.61
372.56
4.95 g
91.4 Sand
Medium
#60
250
349.20
355.58
6.38 g
84.9 Sand
Fine
#80
180
331.75
336.09
4.34 g
80.5 Sand
Fine
#100
150
330.81
334.45
3.64 g
76.8 Sand
Fine
#200
75
323.40
338.43
15.03 g
61.4 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
61.4
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g) 97.8
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual Spec. Gravity TempC (Micron) % Finer Classification Subclass
2 2 1.0140 21.5 33.6 18.3 Silt
5 5 1.0100 21.5 22.1 11.7 Silt
15 15 1.0090 21.5 12.9 10.1 Silt
30 31 1.0085 21.5 9 9.24 Silt
60 59 1.0080 21.5 6.6 8.42 Silt
250 265 1.0055 21.0 3.2 4.11 Clay
1440 1412 1.0040 21.5 1.4 1.85 Clay
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
6/16/2016
Client Sample ID
HT16-15-SURF
Start Date
06/28/2016 12:44
Lab Sample ID
200-33984-D-14
End Date
07/01/2016 13:19
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
plant
Tin Weight
4.20 g
Shape (>#10):
subrounded
Wet Sample + Tin
141.08 g
Hardness (> #10):
hard
Dry Sample + Tin
56.55 g
% Moisture
61.75 %
Date/Time in oven
06/28/2016 12:44
Date/Time out of oven
06/29/2016 9:08
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
57.98 223.65
165.67
Serial Number
426928
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
63.4
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
11/13/2014
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0040
Sample >=#10
1
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
62.4
Reading at High Temp
1.0025
% Passing #10
37.7
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00825
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#10
2000
462.80
463.80
1.00 g
98.4 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
389.42
390.24
0.82 g
97.1 Sand
Medium
#40
425
367.61
370.34
2.73 g
92.8 Sand
Medium
#60
250
349.20
354.93
5.73 g
83.8 Sand
Fine
#80
180
331.75
339.65
7.90 g
71.3 Sand
Fine
#100
150
330.81
334.91
4.10 g
64.8 Sand
Fine
#200
75
323.40
337.20
13.80 g
43.0 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
43.0
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
63.4
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0180
21.5
32.2
38.3 Silt
5
5
1.0125
21.5
21.6
24.4 Silt
15
15
1.0110
21.5
12.7
20.6 Silt
30
32
1.0100
21.5
8.8
18 Silt
60
60
1.0085
21.5
6.5
14.2 Silt
250
259
1.0070
21.0
3.2
10.1 Clay
1440
1406
1.0050
21.5
1.4
5.38 Clay
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-01-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-34009-1
Sediment
Job Number: 200-34009-1
Sdg Number: 34009-1
Date Sampled: 06/15/2016 1000
Date Received: 06/17/2016 1000
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/28/2016 1245
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106558
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-34009-D-1 .txt
147 31 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (%) Qualifier MDL RL
Gravel 0.0
Sand 17.3
Coarse Sand 9.2
Medium Sand 1.0
Fine Sand 7.1
Silt 57.5
Clay 25.2
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-01-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-34009-1
Sediment
Job Number: 200-34009-1
Sdg Number: 34009-1
Date Sampled: 06/15/2016 1000
Date Received: 06/17/2016 1000
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/28/2016 1245
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106558
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-34009-D-1 .txt
147 31 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (% Passing) Qualifier MDL RL
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
90.8
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
90.4
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
89.8
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
89.0
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
87.7
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
86.7
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
82.7
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
71.0
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
44.8
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
36.9
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
31.7
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
25.2
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
18.3
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
10.8
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-12-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-34009-6
Sediment
Job Number: 200-34009-1
Sdg Number: 34009-1
Date Sampled: 06/14/2016 0905
Date Received: 06/17/2016 1000
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/28/2016 1247
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106558
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-34009-D-6.txt
140.65 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (%) Qualifier MDL RL
Gravel 0.0
Sand 5.4
Coarse Sand 0.5
Medium Sand 0.6
Fine Sand 4.3
Silt 60.9
Clay 33.7
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-12-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-34009-6
Sediment
Job Number: 200-34009-1
Sdg Number: 34009-1
Date Sampled: 06/14/2016 0905
Date Received: 06/17/2016 1000
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/28/2016 1247
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106558
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-34009-D-6.txt
140.65 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (% Passing) Qualifier MDL RL
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
99.5
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
99.3
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
98.9
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
98.6
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
98.1
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
97.8
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
94.6
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
76.5
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
59.1
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
48.4
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
40.4
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
33.7
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
24.1
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
16.4
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-18-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-34009-7
Sediment
Job Number: 200-34009-1
Sdg Number: 34009-1
Date Sampled: 06/14/2016 1035
Date Received: 06/17/2016 1000
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/28/2016 1248
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106558
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-34009-D-7.txt
236.09 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (%) Qualifier MDL RL
Gravel 12.6
Sand 43.0
Coarse Sand 42.2
Medium Sand 0.3
Fine Sand 0.5
Silt 39.4
Clay 5.0
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Analytical Data
Client: EA Engineering, Science, and Technology
Client Sample ID: HT16-18-SURF
Lab Sample ID:
Client Matrix:
200-34009-7
Sediment
Job Number: 200-34009-1
Sdg Number: 34009-1
Date Sampled: 06/14/2016 1035
Date Received: 06/17/2016 1000
D422 Grain Size
Analysis Method:
Dilution:
Analysis Date:
Prep Date:
D422
N/A
1.0
06/28/2016 1248
N/A
Analysis Batch: 200-106558
Prep Batch: N/A
Instrument ID:
Lab File ID:
Initial Weight/Volume:
Final Weight/Volume:
D422Jmport
200-34009-D-7.txt
236.09 g
Analyte DryWt Corrected: N Result (% Passing) Qualifier MDL RL
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
100.0
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
97.2
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
87.4
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
45.2
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
45.0
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
44.9
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
44.8
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
44.7
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
44.7
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
44.4
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
17.4
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
9.6
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
8.3
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
6.3
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
5.0
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
3.3
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
1.8
TestAmerica Burlington
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 6/17/2016
Sample ID: HT16-01-SURF Percent Solids: 41.7% Start Date: 6/28/2016
Lab ID: 200-34009-D-1 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 7/1/2016
Shape (> #10): na Non-soil material: plant,shell
Hardness (> #10): na
100000
10000
1000 100
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
100.0
0.0
#10
2000
90.8
9.2
#20
850
90.4
0.4
#40
425
89.8
0.6
#60
250
89.0
0.8
#80
180
87.7
1.3
#100
150
86.7
1.0
#200
75
82.7
4.0
Hyd1
27.4
71.0
11.7
Hyd2
19.9
44.8
26.2
Hyd3
11.9
36.9
7.9
Hyd4
8.6
31.7
5.2
Hyd5
6.1
25.2
6.5
Hyd6
3.1
18.3
6.9
Hyd7
1.4
10.8
7.5
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
0.0
Sand
17.3
Coarse Sand
9.2
Medium Sand
1.0
Fine Sand
7.1
Silt
57.5
Clay
25.2
TestAmerica Burlington
200-34009-D-1 7/1/2016
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 6/17/2016
Sample ID: HT16-12-SURF Percent Solids: 42.8% Start Date: 6/28/2016
Lab ID: 200-34009-D-6 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 7/1/2016
Shape (> #10): jia Non-soil material: plant,shell
Hardness (> #10): _na
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
Particle
Percent
Incremental
size
size, um
finer
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
100.0
0.0
#10
2000
99.5
0.5
#20
850
99.3
0.2
#40
425
98.9
0.4
#60
250
98.6
0.3
#80
180
98.1
0.5
#100
150
97.8
0.3
#200
75
94.6
3.2
Hyd1
26.7
76.5
18.1
Hyd2
18.6
59.1
17.4
Hyd3
11.3
48.4
10.7
Hyd4
8.3
40.4
8.0
Hyd5
6.2
33.7
6.7
Hyd6
3.1
24.1
9.6
Hyd7
1.3
16.4
7.7
TestAmerica Burlington
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
0.0
Sand
5.4
Coarse Sand
0.5
Medium Sand
0.6
Fine Sand
4.3
Silt
60.9
Clay
33.7
200-34009-D-6 7/1/2016
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 6/17/2016
Sample ID: HT16-18-SURF Percent Solids: 82.7% Start Date: S'28/2016
Lab ID: 200-34009-D-7 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 7/1/2016
Shape (> #10): sutxounded Non-soil material: na
Hardness (> #10): hard
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
97.2
2.8
#4
4750
87.4
9.8
#10
2000
45.2
42.2
#20
850
45.0
0.2
#40
425
44.9
0.1
#60
250
44.8
0.1
#80
180
44.7
0.1
#100
150
44.7
0.0
#200
75
44.4
0.3
Hyd1
29.9
17.4
27.0
Hyd2
21.2
9.6
7.8
Hyd3
12.4
8.3
1.2
Hyd4
9
6.3
2.1
Hyd5
6.3
5.0
1.2
Hyd6
3.3
3.3
1.8
Hyd7
1.4
1.8
1.5
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
12.6
Sand
43.0
Coarse Sand
42.2
Medium Sand
0.3
Fine Sand
0.5
Silt
39.4
Clay
5.0
TestAmerica Burlington
200-34009-D-7 7/1/2016
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
6/17/2016
Client Sample ID
HT16-01-SURF
Start Date
06/28/2016 12:45
Lab Sample ID
200-34009-D-1
End Date
07/01/2016 13:41
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
plant,shell
Tin Weight
4.32 g
Shape (>#10):
na
Wet Sample + Tin
159.60 g
Hardness (> #10):
na
Dry Sample + Tin
68.99 g
% Moisture
58.35 %
Date/Time in oven
06/28/2016 12:45
Date/Time out of oven
06/29/2016 9:07
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
50.22 197.53
147.31
Serial Number
426928
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
61.4
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
11/13/2014
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0040
Sample >=#10
5.64
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
55.8
Reading at High Temp
1.0025
% Passing #10
37.9
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00825
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#10
2000
462.80
468.44
5.64 g
90.8 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
389.42
389.69
0.27 g
90.4 Sand
Medium
#40
425
367.61
367.97
0.36 g
89.8 Sand
Medium
#60
250
349.20
349.69
0.49 g
89.0 Sand
Fine
#80
180
331.75
332.57
0.82 g
87.7 Sand
Fine
#100
150
330.81
331.40
0.59 g
86.7 Sand
Fine
#200
75
323.40
325.85
2.45 g
82.7 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
82.7
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
61.4
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0300
21.5
27.4
71 Silt
5
5
1.0200
21.5
19.9
44.8 Silt
15
15
1.0170
21.5
11.9
36.9 Silt
30
30
1.0150
21.5
8.6
31.7 Silt
60
63
1.0125
21.5
6.1
25.2 Silt
250
253
1.0100
21.0
3.1
18.3 Clay
1440
1400
1.0070
21.5
1.4
10.8 Clay
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
6/17/2016
Client Sample ID
HT16-12-SURF
Start Date
06/28/2016 12:47
Lab Sample ID
200-34009-D-6
End Date
07/01/2016 13:56
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
plant,shell
Tin Weight
4.19 g
Shape (>#10):
na
Wet Sample + Tin
155.78 g
Hardness (> #10):
na
Dry Sample + Tin
68.99 g
% Moisture
57.25 %
Date/Time in oven
06/28/2016 12:47
Date/Time out of oven
06/29/2016 9:08
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
57.47 198.12
140.65
Serial Number
426928
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
60.1
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
11/13/2014
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0040
Sample >=#10
0.3
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
59.8
Reading at High Temp
1.0025
% Passing #10
42.5
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00825
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#4
4750
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
#10
2000
462.80
463.10
0.30 g
99.5 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
389.42
389.57
0.15 g
99.3 Sand
Medium
#40
425
367.61
367.88
0.27 g
98.9 Sand
Medium
#60
250
349.20
349.37
0.17 g
98.6 Sand
Fine
#80
180
331.75
332.03
0.28 g
98.1 Sand
Fine
#100
150
330.81
331.00
0.19 g
97.8 Sand
Fine
#200
75
323.40
325.31
1.91 g
94.6 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
94.6
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g) 60.1
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min)
Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0315
21.5
26.7
76.5 Silt
5
5
1.0250
21.5
18.6
59.1 Silt
15
15
1.0210
21.5
11.3
48.4 Silt
30
30
1.0180
21.5
8.3
40.4 Silt
60
57
1.0155
21.5
6.2
33.7 Silt
250
247
1.0120
21.0
3.1
24.1 Clay
1440
1394
1.0090
21.5
1.3
16.4 Clay
-------
TestAmerica Burlington
Sediment Grain Size - D422
Client
Date Received
6/17/2016
Client Sample ID
HT16-18-SURF
Start Date
06/28/2016 12:48
Lab Sample ID
200-34009-D-7
End Date
07/01/2016 14:21
Dry Weight Determination
Non-soil material:
na
Tin Weight
4.22 g
Shape (>#10):
subrounded
Wet Sample + Tin
201.55 g
Hardness (> #10):
hard
Dry Sample + Tin
167.47 g
% Moisture
17.27 %
Date/Time in oven
06/28/2016 12:49
Date/Time out of oven
06/29/2016 9:07
Sample Weights
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Hydrometer Data
Sample Weight (Wet)
51.45 287.54
236.09
Serial Number
426928
Sample Weight (Oven Dried)
195
Calib. Date (mm/dd/yyyy)
11/13/2014
Low Temp (C)
17.0
Sample Split (oven dried)
Tare (g) Pan+Samp (g)
Samp (g)
Reading at Low Temp
1.0040
Sample >=#10
107
High Temp (C)
23.0
Sample <#10
88
Reading at High Temp
1.0025
% Passing #10
37.3
Hydrometer Cal Slope
-0.00025
Hydrometer Cal Intercept
1.00825
Default Soil Gravity
2.6500
Gravel/Sand Fraction (Sieves)
Sample Fraction
Size (um)
Pan Tare (g)
Pan+Sample (g)
Sample
% Finer Classification
Sub Class
3 inch
75000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
2 inch
50000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1.5 inch
37500
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
1 inch
25000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/4 inch
19000
0.00 g
100.0 Gravel
3/8 inch
9500
447.39
452.90
5.51 g
97.2 Gravel
#4
4750
488.16
507.19
19.03 g
87.4 Gravel
#10
2000
462.80
545.02
82.22 g
45.2 Sand
Coarse
#20
850
389.42
389.73
0.31 g
45.0 Sand
Medium
#40
425
367.61
367.86
0.25 g
44.9 Sand
Medium
#60
250
349.20
349.34
0.14 g
44.8 Sand
Fine
#80
180
331.75
331.99
0.24 g
44.7 Sand
Fine
#100
150
330.81
330.90
0.09 g
44.7 Sand
Fine
#200
75
323.40
324.06
0.66 g
44.4 Sand
Fine
0.00 g
44.4
Adjusted Hydrometer Sample Mass
Hydrometer Sample Mass (g)
Silt/Clay Fraction (Hydrometer Test)
195
Particle Size
Hydrometer Test Time (min) Actual
Spec. Gravity Temp C
(Micron) % Finer
Classification Sub Class
2
2
1.0240
21.5
29.9
17.4 Silt
5
5
1.0145
21.5
21.2
9.57 Silt
15
15
1.0130
21.5
12.4
8.34 Silt
30
30
1.0105
21.5
9
6.28 Silt
60
63
1.0090
21.5
6.3
5.04 Silt
250
241
1.0070
21.0
3.3
3.29 Clay
1440
1388
1.0050
21.5
1.4
1.75 Clay
-------
This page intentionally left blank
------- |