NERL Research Abstract

EPA's National Exposure Research Laboratory
GPRA Goal 1 - Clean Air
APM # 444

Significant Research Findings

New Receptor Models for Particulate Matter2 5 Source

Apportionment

Scientific
Problem and
Policy Issues

Regions of the U.S. that are not in compliance with National Ambient Air
Quality Standards (NAAQS) for particulate matter (PM10 or PM2 5) are required
to develop source emissions control strategies. Such strategies depend on
estimating the contributions of individual source emissions to PM
concentrations in the ambient air in order to better target sources for reduction
efforts. The traditional tools for making these estimates have been
mathematical air quality simulation models (AQSMs), coupled with emissions
inventories and likely meteorological scenarios. Difficulties with this approach
include the inability of any AQSM to capture the full complexity of pollutant
transport and transformation in the atmosphere, and the uncertainties of
emissions rates taken from existing emissions inventories. An alternative to
this source-oriented approach is a receptor-oriented one, as embodied in air
quality receptor models. Receptor models are mathematical procedures for
identifying and quantifying the sources of ambient air pollutants at a site
(receptor), primarily on the basis of the concentrations of source-tracing
chemical species measured at the receptor and generally without need of
emissions inventories and meteorological data. Receptor models are the natural
complement to AQSMs, and have begun to be used in State Implementation
Plans (SIPs) for achieving NAAQS compliance.

Research Two different receptor modeling approaches were selected for development
Approach and/or improvement under this project: a chemical mass balance (CMB) and a
multivariate approach. The two differ greatly in their complexity and their
domains of applicability. The CMB approach requires as data the chemical
profiles of potential contributing sources and the corresponding chemical data
from measurements performed on a single ambient air sample. In contrast the
input data required by a multivariate approach are chemical measurements from
many (hundreds) of ambient air samples which are mathematically manipulated
simultaneously. It is a more complex approach, but its great potential
advantage is that chemical profiles of the sources are not required; instead, they
are generated from the ambient data themselves. The CMB approach has been

National Exposure Research Laboratory - September 2000


-------
supported by EPA's Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS)
for more than a decade in the form of the DOS-based software module CMB7.
Work under this project was intended to update CMB7 by converting it to a
Windows-based application, improving its usability, and correcting known
errors.

The particular multivariate approach chosen for this project is based on a form
of Factor Analysis, but its novelty is that physically-meaningful constraints are
imposed which are intended to remove the undesirable ambiguity of the
multiple solutions that are characteristic of ordinary Factor Analysis.

Results and The two models that have resulted from this project are EPA-CMB8.2 and
Implications UNMIX (named for its function, which is to "unmix" the concentrations of

chemical species measured in the ambient air to arrive at the magnitudes of the
underlying sources). A software module and accompanying user's manual for
each model are now available. These tools advance the viability of the receptor
modeling approach to air pollution control. The availability of standardized
versions of these two receptor models is expected to facilitate their use
throughout the air pollution research and regulatory community, and to
facilitate the intercomparison of results derived from different data sets. Both
models should be usable on data generated from EPA's new 300-site PM2 5
Speciation Network, with UNMIX particularly well-suited because of its large
data volume requirement.

The development of the CMB8 software was done under contract, initially with
the Desert Research Institute and subsequently with Pacific Environmental
Services, Inc. Both efforts received the collaborative support (funding,
administrative, and technical) of EPA's Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards (OAQPS) and NERL. The present version of the CMB8 software is
described in

Coulter, T., Wagoner, R.A., Lewis, C. W. Chemical Mass Balance Software: EPA-CMB8.2.
Submitted for inclusion in Proceedings of the AWMA/EPA Symposium,
Measurement of Toxic and Related Air Pollutants, September 12 - 14, 2000, Research
Triangle Park NC. 2000.

UNMIX software development was performed at the University of Southern
California, through a combination of cooperative agreements and contract
support. An initial evaluation of UNMIX occurred during an EPA-sponsored
workshop held during February, 2000 as described in the following publication.

Willis, R. D. Workshop on UNMIX and PMF as Applied to PM2 5; June. Report no.
EPA/600/A-00/048. 2000.

Research

Collaboration

and

Publications

National Exposure Research Laboratory - September 2000


-------
Future	Because of the complexity of these models, particularly UNMIX, the small

Research amount of evaluation performed thus far is promising, but is inadequate to
establish whether either can be regarded as deserving of EPA's official
endorsement as a regulatory tool. Evaluation will continue in the form of their
application to data from various field research studies and monitoring networks,
such as the new Super Sites program and the PM2 5 Speciation Network. The
experience and understanding gained from these applications, along with peer
review of the resulting publications, is expected to culminate in a decision on
whether the models will receive EPA's endorsement.

Questions about NERL's source apportionment/receptor modeling research

may be directed to:

Charles W. Lewis, Ph.D.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

National Exposure Research Laboratory (MD-47)

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Phone: (919)541-3154

E-mail: lewis.charlesw@epa.gov

National Exposure Research Laboratory - September 2000


-------