A EPA

GREEN
POWER

PARTNERSHIP

TOP 30
LOCAL
GOVERNMENT

Top 30 Local Government Partner List (as of April 6,

2015)

The Top 30 Local Government list represents the largest green power users
among local government partners within the Green Power Partnership. The
combined green power use of these organizations amounts to nearly 3
billion kilowatt-hours annually, which is equivalent to the electricity use of

more than 280,000 average American homes annually.

Annual Green Power
Usage (kWh)

GP% of Total
Electricity Use*

Green Power

Resources

Providers (listed in descending
order by kWh supplied to Partner)

1. City of Houston, TX

623,01 3,375

50%

Solar, Wind

Reliant Energy0, On-site
Generation

2. District of Columbia

459,000,000

100%

Wind

WGL Energy"

3, City of Austin, "TX

372,344,963

99%

Wind

Austin Energy"

4. City of Dallas, TX

359,368,000

50%

Wind

Invenergy

5. Montgomery County Clean Energy Buyers Group

223,307,000

40%

Wind

Renewable Choice Energy"

6. Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport

129,255,000

30%

Solar, Wind

Champion Energy Services, On-
site Generation

7. City of Portland, OR

88,51 3,000

60%

Biogas, Small-hydro,
Solar, Wind

3Degrees°, On-site Generation

8. Port of Portland

75,070,343

103%

Solar, Wind

NextEra Energy Resources", On-
site Generation

9. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission


-------
Annual Green Power
Usage (kWh)

GP% of Total
Electricity Use*

Green Power
Resources

Providers (listed in descending
order by kWh supplied to Partner)

59,952,598

28%

Wind

Constellation

10. Forest County Potawatomi Community

55,035,000

105%

Solar

3Degrees°, On-site Generation

11. City of Philadelphia, PA

54,690,000

7%

Biogas, Geothermal,
Solar, Wind

On-site Generation, PPL
EnergyPlus"

12. Chicago Park District

54,435,41 1

50%

Various

Integrys Energy"

1 3. Western Pennsylvania Energy Consortium

42,640,681

2 5%

Various

Duquesne Light Energy

14. City of Columbus, OH

42,443,700

14%

Biomass, Wind

American Municipal Power,
American Electric Power"

1 5. City of Boston, MA

33,61 3,000

2 5%

Wind

Renewable Choice Energy"

16. City of Grand Rapids, Ml

26,830,667

27%

Biogas, Solar, Wind

Consumers Energy", On-site
Generation

1 7. City of Santa Monica, CA

25,900,000

100%

Solar, Wind

Commerce Energy", On-site
Generation

18. City of Edmond, OK

23,879,476

70%

Wind

Oklahoma Municipal Power
Authority

19. City of Evanston, IL

23,027,757

100%

Solar, Wind

MC Squared Energy Services", On-
site Generation

20. City of Bellingham, WA

22,000,000

100%

Wind

Puget Sound Energy"

21. City of San Diego, CA


-------
Annual Green Power
Usage (kWh)

GP% of Total
Electricity Use*

Green Power
Resources

Providers (listed in descending
order by kWh supplied to Partner)

20,344,825

8%

Biogas, Small-hydro,
Solar

On-site Generation

22. City of Denton, TX

18,067,467

59%

Biogas, Wind

Denton Municipal Electric

23. Arlington County, VA

16,066,107

19%

Solar, Wind

Dominion Virgina Power", On-site
Generation

24. City of Rockville, MD

16,000,000

100%

Wind

Renewable Choice Energy"

25. City of Palo Alto, CA

1 5,996,000

56%

Solar

City of Palo Alto Utilities"

26. Austin (TX) Independent School District

1 5,429,997

1 1%

Wind

Austin Energy"

27. Los Angeles World Airports

1 5,404,043

10%

Biomass, Wind

Los Angeles Dept. of Water and
Power

28. City of Worcester, MA

14,500,000

2 5%

Wind

Renewable Choice Energy"

29. Yolo County, CA

1 3,501,338

1 52%

Solar

On-site Generation

30. City of Lacey, WA

12,566,008

100%

Biogas, Small-hydro,
Solar, Wind

Puget Sound Energy"

''Reflects the amount of green power as a percentage of total electricity use. Partners choosing
to purchase green power in an amount exceeding 1 00 percent of their U.S. organization-wide
electricity use are listed as such.

"Indicates Provider is selling Partner a third-party certified green power product. For more

information on third-party certification, visit

http://www.epa.qov/green power/buyqp/certified .htm.


-------