&EPA
Office of Water
Fiscal Year 2011
H JESUS
-------
FY 2011
ACS
Code
FY 2011 National Water Program Guidance
Measure Text
Measure
Groups
**FY
2011
Budget
Target
FY 2011 Planning
Target
Regional
Aggregates
Region
1
Region
2
Region
3
Region
4
Region
5
Region
6
Region
7
Region
8
Region
9
Region
10
HQ
***SP
Proposed
Target (FY
2014)
* Measure categories include: OMB PA (OMB Program Assessment); BUD (Budget Measure); SG (State Grant Measure); SMM (Senior Management Measure); EQR (EPAStat Quarterly Report Measure); NPMStat (OW EPAStat measure), ARRA (Recovery Act Measure), and I
(Indicator Measure). ** FY 2011 Budget Target is from 4-year performance measure table in the FY 2011 Presidents Budget. *** Strategic Plan (SP) proposed targets are from the proposed EPA Strategic Plan, to be submitted to Congress in 2010.
Subobjective 2.1.1 Water Safe to Drink
2.1.1
Percent of the population served by community
water systems that receive drinking water that
meets all applicable health-based drinking
water standards through approaches including
effective treatment and source water protection.
OMB PA
BUD
SG
NPMStat
ARRA
91%
91%
90%
89%
75%
88%
93%
95%
88%
93%
90%
95%
91%
93%
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
89.9%
89%
75%
88%
91.7%
95%
88%
92%
90%
95%
91%
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
92%
92%
79%
89.9%
93.7%
95.4%
89.7%
94.1%
95.8%
96.9%
96.4%
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
92%
91%
82%
89.6%
94.1%
94.9%
89.4%
83%
96%
97.5%
96.1%
FY 2005 BASELINE
89%
92.5%
55.3%
93.2%
93.0%
94.1%
87.8%
91.2%
94.7%
94.6%
94.8%
FY 2010 UNIVERSE (in millions)
293.5
15.0
30.4
25.4
57.7
43.3
37.8
11.9
10.5
50.2
11.3
National Program Manager Comments
The universe represents the population served by community water systems. The National target for FY 2011 is higher than the regional aggregate target to be consistent with the FY 2011 budget target.
SP-1
Percent of community water systems that meet
all applicable health-based standards through
approaches that include effective treatment and
source water protection.
OMB PA
BUD
SG
90%
90%
87%
83%
82%
80%
90%
91%
85%
87%
90%
88%
90%
90%
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
87%
83%
82%
80%
90.4%
90%
85%
87%
90%
90%
88%
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
89.1%
85.7%
86.0%
90.7%
90.9%
93.0%
87.8%
87.5%
90.0%
87.9%
88.0%
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
89%
85%
86%
91%
91%
91.4%
86.8%
88%
90%
88.7%
87.9%
FY 2005 BASELINE
89%
85.7%
86.4%
91.8%
91.0%
92.0%
86.2%
86.8%
90.3%
91.6%
87.3%
FY 2010 UNIVERSE
51,388
2,714
3,624
4,462
8,808
7,332
8,231
4,106
3,223
4,492
4,396
National Program Manager Comments
New measure starting in FY 08. FY 07 end-of-year data not from ACS. The National target for FY 2011 is higher than the regional aggregate target to be consistent with the FY 2011 budget target.
SP-2
Percent of "person months" (i.e. all persons
served by community water systems times 12
months) during which community water
systems provide drinking water that meets all
applicable health-based drinking water
standards.
OMB PA
BUD
SMM
95%
95%
95%
94%
90%
95%
96%
96%
94%
95%
95%
98%
95%
97%
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
94.9%
94%
90%
95%
95.2%
96%
94%
95%
95%
98%
95%
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
97.2%
97.5%
91.9%
96.9%
98.3%
97.8%
96.2%
98.2%
99.0%
98.6%
98.7%
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
97%
95.9%
91.2%
98.2%
98.2%
97.3%
95.7%
97%
99%
99.1%
98.3%
FY 2005 BASELINE
97%
96%
92%
99%
98%
97%
97%
98%
99%
97%
98%
FY 2010 UNIVERSE (in millions)
3,525.1
180.2
365.6
305.9
693.1
519.9
454.1
142.8
126.0
602.0
135.5
National Program Manager Comments
Indicator measure in FY 07.
SP-3
Percent of the population in Indian country
served by community water systems that
receive drinking water that meets all applicable
health-based drinking water standards.
BUD
SMM
87%
87%
87%
95%
95%
n/a
90%
95%
80%
80%
87%
70%
87%
88%
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
82.2%
95%
95%
n/a
89%
95%
78%
85%
87%
75%
87%
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
81.2%
99.9%
99.6%
n/a
100.0%
99.3%
87.2%
83.3%
90.4%
68.1%
87.2%
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
83%
100%
53.1%
n/a
89.8%
96.9%
83.6%
87%
88.2%
73.4%
99%
FY 2005 BASELINE
86%
100.0%
100.0%
n/a
100.0%
99.5%
90.4%
86.5%
82.6%
80.9%
88.1%
FY 2010 UNIVERSE
879,658
90,594
11,071
n/a
20,962
106,972
71,173
5,394
90,832
433,933
48,727
National Program Manager Comments
The universe represents the population in Indian country served by community water systems.
Page 1 of39
-------
FY 2011
ACS
Code
FY 2011 National Water Program Guidance
Measure Text
Measure
Groups
**FY
2011
Budget
Target
FY 2011 Planning
Target
Regional
Aggregates
Region
1
Region
2
Region
3
Region
4
Region
5
Region
6
Region
7
Region
8
Region
9
Region
10
HQ
***SP
Proposed
Target (FY
2014)
* Measure categories include: OMB PA (OMB Program Assessment); BUD (Budget Measure); SG (State Grant Measure); SMM (Senior Management Measure); EQR (EPAStat Quarterly Report Measure); NPMStat (OW EPAStat measure), ARRA (Recovery Act Measure), and I
(Indicator Measure). ** FY 2011 Budget Target is from 4-year performance measure table in the FY 2011 Presidents Budget. *** Strategic Plan (SP) proposed targets are from the proposed EPA Strategic Plan, to be submitted to Congress in 2010.
SP-4a
Percent of community water systems where risk
to public health is minimized through source
water protection
OMB PA
50%
50%
39%
64%
60%
25%
38%
38%
50%
18%
45%
9%
40%
50%
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
35.4%
64%
60%
25%
38%
38%
36%
18%
44%
8%
35%
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
35%
64%
60%
27%
38%
38%
38%
9%
38%
8%
38%
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
32%
64%
58%
25%
30%
40%
25%
17%
37%
8%
35%
FY 2005 BASELINE
20%
51%
30%
12%
21%
19%
19%
13%
20%
1%
28%
FY 2010 UNIVERSE
51,388
2,714
3,624
4,462
8,808
7,332
8,231
4,106
3,223
4,492
4,396
National Program Manager Comments
FY 07 end-of-year data not from ACS. The universe is the number of community water systems. The National target for FY 2011 is higher than the regional aggregate target to be consistent with the FY 2011
budget target.
SP-4b
Percent of the population served by community
water systems where risk to public health is
minimized through source water protection.
SG
57%
54%
93%
80%
58%
49%
65%
62%
20%
40%
12%
65%
62%
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
52.4%
95%
80%
58%
51%
64%
60%
20%
35%
12%
72%
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
54.0%
93.0%
80.0%
63.0%
51.0%
65.0%
63.0%
15.0%
37.0%
12.0%
82.0%
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
48%
95%
81%
57%
40%
64%
44%
16%
35%
12%
71%
FY 2010 UNIVERSE (in millions)
293.5
15.0
30.4
25.4
57.7
43.3
37.8
11.9
10.5
50.2
11.3
National Program Manager Comments
SP-4b is a new measure starting in FY 08. Note: "Minimized risk" is achieved by the substantial implementation, as determined by the state, of actions in a source water protection strategy. The universe is the
most recent SDWIS inventory of community water systems. FY 07 end-of-year adjusted data not from ACS.
SP-5
By 2015, in coordination with other federal
agencies, reduce by 50 percent the number of
homes on tribal land lacking access to safe
drinking water.
OMB PA
ARRA
I
8
(Long-
Term FY
2011
Target)
Indicator
19,319
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
27,367
(8.58%)
27,367
(8.58%)
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
43,437
43,437
FY 2009 COMMITMENT
28,977 (9.0%)
28,977
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
34,855 (11%)
34,855
FY 2003 BASELINE
38,637
38,637
UNIVERSE
319,070
319,070
National Program Manager Comments
This measure involves coordination with other federal agencies. Measure is converted into an indicator for FY 2011 and supplemented by SDW-18.
SDW-18
Number of American Indian and Alaska Native
homes provided access to safe drinking water in
coordination with other federal agencies.
ARRA
100,700
136,100
FY 2009 BASELINE
80,900
UNIVERSE
360,000
National Program Manager Comments
New measure for FY 2011, to supplement SP-5 in the NWPG and replace SP-5 in the new Strategic Plan.
SDW-la
Percent of community water systems (CWSs)
that have undergone a sanitary survey within
the past three years (five years for outstanding
performers) as required under the Interim
Enhanced and Long-Term I Surface Water
Treatment Rules.
OMB PA
BUD
SG
95%
95%
89%
90%
95%
91%
87%
91%
93%
87%
95%
70%
95%
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
88.6%
90%
95%
91%
87.7%
91%
93%
87%
95%
75%
66%
Page 2 of39
-------
FY 2011
ACS
Code
FY 2011 National Water Program Guidance
Measure Text
Measure
Groups
**FY
2011
Budget
Target
FY 2011 Planning
Target
Regional
Aggregates
Region
1
Region
2
Region
3
Region
4
Region
5
Region
6
Region
7
Region
8
Region
9
Region
10
HQ
***SP
Proposed
Target (FY
2014)
* Measure categories include: OMB PA (OMB Program Assessment); BUD (Budget Measure); SG (State Grant Measure); SMM (Senior Management Measure); EQR (EPAStat Quarterly Report Measure); NPMStat (OW EPAStat measure), ARRA (Recovery Act Measure), and I
(Indicator Measure). ** FY 2011 Budget Target is from 4-year performance measure table in the FY 2011 Presidents Budget. *** Strategic Plan (SP) proposed targets are from the proposed EPA Strategic Plan, to be submitted to Congress in 2010.
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
88%
99.0%
95.0%
93.2%
87.0%
92.9%
92.0%
91.0%
90.0%
67.0%
80.0%
FY 2009 UNIVERSE
11,038
88%
479
1,019
1,215
1,750
1,356
2,109
780
808
936
586
National Program Manager Comments
* Prior to FY 07, this measure tracked states, rather than CWSs, in compliance with this regulation. The national FY 07 end-of-year result provided is an estimate.
SDW-lb
Number of tribal community water systems
(CWSs) that have undergone a sanitary survey
within the past three years (five years for
outstanding performers) as required under the
Interim Enhanced and Long-Term I Surface
Water Treatment Rule.
NPMStat
70
62
2
2
n/a
1
2
8
1
15
23
8
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
55
55
1
2
n/a
1
2
7
1
7
26
8
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
63
2
2
n/a
1
2
9
1
13
25
8
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
47
1
2
n/a
1
2
5
1
16
12
7
FY 2005 BASELINE
22
n/a
1
n/a
1
2
1
1
0
9
7
FY 2009 UNIVERSE
74
1
2
n/a
1
2
9
1
25
23
10
National Program Manager Comments
A sanitary survey is an on-site review of the water sources, facilities, equipment, operation, and maintenance of a public water system for the purpose of evaluating the adequacy of the facilities for producing and
distributing safe drinking water.
SDW-2
Percent of the data for violations of health-
based standards at public water systems that is
accurate and complete in SDWIS-FED for all
maximum contaminant level and treatment
technique rules (excluding the Lead and Copper
Rule).
OMB PA
I
LT 2011
OMB PA
Target:
90%
Indicator
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
64.0%
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
62%
FY 2007 END OF YEAR RESULT
60%
FY 2005 BASELINE
n/a
UNIVERSE
n/a
National Program Manager Comments
The FY 07 end-of-year result is based on audits conducted during 2005 and 2006. Future results will be based on three-year rolling data from data verification audits conducted during the past 3 calendar years.
SDW-
3
Percent of the lead action level data that for the
Lead and Copper Rule, for community water
systems serving over 3,300 people, that is
complete in SDWIS-FED.
I
Indicator
FY 2005 2007 END OF YOUR RESULTS
87%
88%
97%
93%
85%
98%
83%
71%
89%
76%
90%
FY 2002 2004 END OF YEAR RESULTS
80%
89%
97%
86%
87%
83%
47%
68%
90%
88%
85%
FY 2005 BASELINE
n/a
UNIVERSE
8,954
435
699
676
2,006
1,594
1,438
440
366
913
387
National Program Manager Comments
*This measure is calculated every three years to match the requirements for lead sampling. The 2008—2010 results will be calculated in April 2011.
SDW-4
Fund utilization rate [cumulative dollar amount
of loan agreements divided by cumulative funds
available for projects] for the Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund (DWSRF).
OMB PA
BUD
ARRA
89%
89%
89%
(87% base)
90%
87%
(86% base)
90%
(89% base)
80%
(80%
ARRA)
87%
(89% base)
95%
(94% base)
90%
(87% base)
85%
92%
(94% base)
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
85.7%
89%
90%
85%
89%
78%
85%
94%
89%
75%
94%
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
92%
94%
90%
95%
95%
79%
93%
99%
93%
83%
86%
Page 3 of39
-------
FY 2011
ACS
Code
FY 2011 National Water Program Guidance
Measure Text
Measure
Groups
**FY
2011
Budget
Target
FY 2011 Planning
Target
Regional
Aggregates
Region
1
Region
2
Region
3
Region
4
Region
5
Region
6
Region
7
Region
8
Region
9
Region
10
HQ
***SP
Proposed
Target (FY
2014)
* Measure categories include: OMB PA (OMB Program Assessment); BUD (Budget Measure); SG (State Grant Measure); SMM (Senior Management Measure); EQR (EPAStat Quarterly Report Measure); NPMStat (OW EPAStat measure), ARRA (Recovery Act Measure), and I
(Indicator Measure). ** FY 2011 Budget Target is from 4-year performance measure table in the FY 2011 Presidents Budget. *** Strategic Plan (SP) proposed targets are from the proposed EPA Strategic Plan, to be submitted to Congress in 2010.
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
90%
97.2%
94%
91.5%
89.5%
81.8%
88.1%
102%
85.9%
85.7%
93%
FY 2005 BASELINE
84.7%
78.5%
93.0%
83.3%
88.0%
87.0%
64.5%
91.0%
84.0%
80.0%
94.3%
UNIVERSE (FY 2007 in millions)
$14,419.7
$1,378.1
$2,686.4
$832.3
$1,527.6
$2,812.2
$1,283.7
$978.8
$1,006.8
$1,321.7
$592.1
National Program Manager Comments
Universe represents the funds available for projects for the DWSRF through 2007, in millions of dollars (i.e., the denominator of the measure). FY 2011 targets include two numbers: 1) total with ARRA and 2) base
(in parenthesis), unless noted otherwise.
SDW-5
Number of Drinking Water State Revolving
Fund (DWSRF) projects that have initiated
operations, (cumulative)
OMB PA
BUD
ARRA
500
Annual
(200
ARRA)
5,726
(5,526 base)
5,231
624
(612 base)
410
486
(482 base)
615
(565 base)
1050
(900
ARRA)
235
(207 base)
542
(487 base)
490
(460 base)
330
(310 base)
500
(450 base)
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
4,424
4,424
500
405
440
530
935
182
462
450
280
240
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
4,576
4,576
564
396
464
564
936
160
427
479
225
361
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
4,082
4,082
465
383
418
522
847
135
380
418
207
307
FY 2005 BASELINE
2,611
2,611
320
311
261
369
557
59
229
242
123
140
National Program Manager Comments
This measure was annually reported in ACS starting in FY 2009. FY 2011 targets include two numbers: 1) total with ARRA and 2) base (in parenthesis), unless noted otherwise.
SDW-7a
Percent of deep injection wells that are used to
inject industrial, municipal, or hazardous waste
(Class I) that lose mechanical integrity and are
returned to compliance within 180 days thereby
reducing the potential to endanger underground
sources of drinking water.
OMB PA
BUD
SG
92%
92%
88%
n/a
n/a
n/a
90%
50%
93%
90%
95%
100%
75%
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
89%
n/a
n/a
n/a
90%
75%
93%
90%
95%
90%
75%
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
100%
n/a
n/a
n/a
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
UNIVERSE
8
n/a
1
n/a
1
2
2
0
2
0
0
National Program Manager Comments
Measure revised for FY 09. FY 2009 EOY Result is the new baseline. Universe for FY 09 will be updated to reflect the forecasted number of mechanical integrity failures.
*The universe reflects FY 07 end-of-year and is subject to change in FY 08. The National target for FY 2011 is higher than the regional aggregate target to be consistent with the FY 2011 budget target.
SDW-7b
Percent of deep injection wells that are used to
enhance oil/natural gas recovery, or for the
injection of other (Class II) fluids associated
with oil and natural gas production, that have
lost mechanical integrity and are returned to
compliance within 180 days thereby reducing
the potential to endanger underground sources
of drinking water.
OMB PA
BUD
SG
89%
89%
86%
n/a
90%
75%
70%
60%
90%
85%
95%
90%
85%
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
85%
n/a
90%
45%
70%
57%
90%
85%
95%
90%
85%
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
90%
n/a
100%
57%
83%
67%
96%
85%
95%
100%
100%
UNIVERSE
2,816
n/a
1
30
52
269
1,086
310
159
896
13
National Program Manager Comments
Measure revised for FY 09. FY 2009 EOY Result is the new baseline. Universe for FY 09 will be updated to reflect the forecasted number of mechanical integrity failures.
*The universe reflects FY 07 end-of-year and is subject to change in FY 08. The National target for FY 2011 is higher than the regional aggregate target to be consistent with the FY 2011 budget target.
Page 4 of39
-------
FY 2011
ACS
Code
FY 2011 National Water Program Guidance
Measure Text
Measure
Groups
**FY
2011
Budget
Target
FY 2011 Planning
Target
Regional
Aggregates
Region
1
Region
2
Region
3
Region
4
Region
5
Region
6
Region
7
Region
8
Region
9
Region
10
HQ
***SP
Proposed
Target (FY
2014)
* Measure categories include: OMB PA (OMB Program Assessment); BUD (Budget Measure); SG (State Grant Measure); SMM (Senior Management Measure); EQR (EPAStat Quarterly Report Measure); NPMStat (OW EPAStat measure), ARRA (Recovery Act Measure), and I
(Indicator Measure). ** FY 2011 Budget Target is from 4-year performance measure table in the FY 2011 Presidents Budget. *** Strategic Plan (SP) proposed targets are from the proposed EPA Strategic Plan, to be submitted to Congress in 2010.
SDW-7c
Percent of deep injection wells that are used for
salt solution mining (Class III) that lose
mechanical integrity and are returned to
compliance within 180 days thereby reducing
the potential to endanger underground sources
of drinking water.
OMB PA
BUD
SG
93%
93%
86%
n/a
95%
n/a
100%
50%
94%
85%
95%
90%
n/a
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
90%
n/a
95%
99%
100%
75%
94%
85%
95%
90%
n/a
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
100%
n/a
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
UNIVERSE
7
n/a
0
n/a
0
2
0
0
4
1
n/a
National Program Manager Comments
Measure revised for FY 09. FY 2009 EO Y Result is the new baseline. Universe for FY 09 will be updated to reflect the forecasted number of mechanical integrity failures.
*The universe reflects FY 07 end-of-year and is subject to change in FY 08. The National target for FY 2011 is higher than the regional aggregate target to be consistent with the FY 2011 budget target.
SDW-8
Percent of high priority Class V wells identified
in sensitive ground water protection areas that
are closed or permitted, (cumulative)
[Measure will still set targets and commitments
and report results in both % and #. Numerical
commitments from UIC database.]
OMB PA
BUD
76%
76%
90%
86%
85%
70%
81%
86%
93%
85%
55%
70%
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
71%
90%
86%
85%
75%
75%
86%
93%
80%
43%
50%
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
82%
99.9%
97.0%
94.0%
65.0%
87.0%
100.0%
100.0%
89.0%
42.0%
71.0%
FY 2009 UNIVERSE
53,074
15,189
286
4,031
1,692
3,585
271
7,893
2,751
5,211
12,165
National Program Manager Comments
Measure revised for FY 09. FY 2009 EO Y Result is the new baseline.Universe for FY 09 will be updated for the revised measure. Note: Measure will still set target and commitment and report results in both
percent and number.
"Sensitive ground water protection areas" are defined by the UIC primacy program director, but at a minimum must include ground water based community water system source water areas. This measure does not
report all of the high priority wells that are being closed or permitted because some states do not distinguish between high priority wells in ground water based community water system source water areas and other
areas.
SDW-11
Percent of DWSRF projects awarded to small
PWS serving <500, 501-3,300, and 3,301-
10,000 consumers.
I
Indicator
FY 2009 BASELINE
71%
72%
75%
70%
30%
68%
76%
80%
87%
81%
80%
UNIVERSE (Total number of projects)
623
138
44
56
43
126
33
70
87
26
75
National Program Manager Comments
New measure starting in FY 2011.
SDW-12
Percent of DWSRF dollars awarded to small
PWS serving <500, 501-3,300, 3,301-10,000
consumers.
I
Indicator
FY 2009 BASELINE
40%
24%
38%
40%
16%
42%
36%
54%
52%
60%
79%
UNIVERSE (Millions)
1,420.5
127.7
251.5
137.2
176.9
246.6
211.7
105.7
108.0
55.2
101.8
National Program Manager Comments
New measure starting in FY 2011.
SDW-13
Percent of DWSRF loans that include
assistance to disadvantaged communities.
I
Indicator
FY 2009 BASELINE
34%
22%
55%
43%
33%
20%
42%
27%
43%
23%
32%
Page 5 of39
-------
FY 2011
ACS
Code
FY 2011 National Water Program Guidance
Measure Text
Measure
Groups
**FY
2011
Budget
Target
FY 2011 Planning
Target
Regional
Aggregates
Region
1
Region
2
Region
3
Region
4
Region
5
Region
6
Region
7
Region
8
Region
9
Region
10
HQ
***SP
Proposed
Target (FY
2014)
* Measure categories include: OMB PA (OMB Program Assessment); BUD (Budget Measure); SG (State Grant Measure); SMM (Senior Management Measure); EQR (EPAStat Quarterly Report Measure); NPMStat (OW EPAStat measure), ARRA (Recovery Act Measure), and I
(Indicator Measure). ** FY 2011 Budget Target is from 4-year performance measure table in the FY 2011 Presidents Budget. *** Strategic Plan (SP) proposed targets are from the proposed EPA Strategic Plan, to be submitted to Congress in 2010.
UNIVERSE
623 138
44
56
43
126
33
70
87
26
75
National Program Manager Comments
New measure starting in FY 2011.
SDW-14
Number and percent of PWS, including new
PWS, serving fewer than 500 persons. (New
PWS are those first reported to EPA in last
calendar year).
I
Indicator
FY 2009 BASELINE (CWS & NTNCWS
<500)
40,289
3662
3647
4741
6061
7357
4949
2827
2659
4386
4384
64%
77%
65%
67%
56%
61%
52%
60%
69%
68%
78%
FY 2009 New Systems (CWS & NTNCWS)
511
51
59
62
89
94
45
30
51
30
30
UNIVERSE (CWS & NTNCWS)
70,347
4736
5577
7046
10774
12040
9567
4715
3863
6415
5614
National Program Manager Comments
New measure starting in FY 2011.
SDW-15
Number and percent of small PWS (<500, 501 -
3,300, 3,301-10,000) with repeat health based
Nitrate/Nitrite, Stage 1 D/DBP, SWTR and
TCR violations.
I
Indicator
FY 2009 BASELINE (CWS and NTNCWS
1,732
164
208
113
218
102
394
288
91
154
172
<10,000 w/ repeat Health-Based Viols)
3%
4%
4%
2%
2%
1%
4%
6%
2%
3%
3%
UNIVERSE (CWS and NTNCWS <10,000)
66,165
4478
5189
6751
9840
11270
9082
4562
3690
5877
5426
National Program Manager Comments
New measure starting in FY 2011.
SDW-16
Average time for small PWS (<500, 501 -
3,300, 3,301-10,000) to return to compliance
with acute Nitrate/Nitrite, Stage 1 D/DBP,
SWTR and TCR health-based violations (based
on state-reported RTC determination date).
I
Indicator
FY 2009 BASELINE (CWS and NTNCWS
<10,000 w/ Acute Health-Based Viols)
96
15
9
31
1
6
6
17
4
7
3
88
134
18
69
74
44
72
153
135
53
36
UNIVERSE (CWS and NTNCWS <10,000)
66,165
4478
5189
6751
9840
11270
9082
4562
3690
5877
5426
National Program Manager Comments
New measure starting in FY 2011.
SDW-17
Number and percent of schools and childcare
centers that meet all health-based drinking
water standards.
I
Indicator
FY 2009 BASELINE
7,260
1057
705
1179
688
1933
329
197
224
523
425
94%
92%
95%
96%
95%
95%
95%
89%
94%
90%
97%
UNIVERSE
7,703
1146
740
1228
724
2041
345
222
239
578
440
Page 6 of39
-------
FY 2011
ACS
Code
FY 2011 National Water Program Guidance
Measure Text
Measure
Groups
**FY
2011
Budget
Target
FY 2011 Planning
Target
Regional
Aggregates
Region
1
Region
2
Region
3
Region
4
Region
5
Region
6
Region
7
Region
8
Region
9
Region
10
HQ
***SP
Proposed
Target (FY
2014)
* Measure categories include: OMB PA (OMB Program Assessment); BUD (Budget Measure); SG (State Grant Measure); SMM (Senior Management Measure); EQR (EPAStat Quarterly Report Measure); NPMStat (OW EPAStat measure), ARRA (Recovery Act Measure), and I
(Indicator Measure). ** FY 2011 Budget Target is from 4-year performance measure table in the FY 2011 Presidents Budget. *** Strategic Plan (SP) proposed targets are from the proposed EPA Strategic Plan, to be submitted to Congress in 2010.
National Program Manager Comments
New measure starting in FY 2011.
Subobjective 2.1.2 Fish and Shellfish Safe to Eat
SP-6
Percent of women of childbearing age having
mercury levels in blood above the level of
concern.
BUD
4.9%
Defer for FY 2011
Defer for FY
2011
4.6%
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
5.1%
5.1%
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
data n/a
data n/a
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
data n/a
data n/a
FY 2005 BASELINE
5.7%
5.7%
National Program Manager Comments
SP-6 is a new measure starting in FY 08.
FS-la
Percent of river miles where fish tissue were
assessed to support waterbody-specific or
regional consumption advisories or a
determination that no consumption advice is
necessary. (Great Lakes measured separately;
Alaska not included) (Report every two years)
I
Indicator
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
39%
FY 200S END OF YEAR RESULT
26%(910,000)
FY 2007 END OF YEAR RESULT
26%(910,000)
FY 2005 BASELINE
24% (840,000)
UNIVERSE
100%(3.5 million)
National Program Manager Comments
*This is the actual FY 06 end-of-year result. An estimated FY 06 end-of-year result had been entered in ACS.
FS-lb
Percent of lake acres where fish tissue were
assessed to support waterbody-specific or
regional consumption advisories or a
determination that no consumption advice is
necessary. (Great Lakes measured separately;
Alaska not included) (Report every two years)
I
Indicator
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
43%
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
38%(15.2 million)
FY 2007 END OF YEAR RESULT
38%(15.2 million)
FY 2005 BASELINE
35%(14 million)
UNIVERSE
100% (40 million)
National Program Manager Comments
*This is the actual FY 06 end-of-year result. An estimated FY 06 end-of-year result had been entered in ACS.
Subobjective 2.1.3 Water Safe for Swimming
SP-9
Percent of days of the beach season that coastal
and Great Lakes beaches monitored by state
beach safety programs are open and safe for
swimming.
BUD
SG
95%
95%
91%
98%
95%
95%
92%
88%
80%
n/a
n/a
86%
95%
96%
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
95%
98%
95%
95%
92%
85%
85%
n/a
n/a
86%
95%
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
95%
n/a
98.0%
99.2%
96.8%
93.7%
82.0%
n/a
n/a
93.0%
98.0%
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
95%
98.6%
97.9%
98%
96.4%
91%
85%
n/a
n/a
93.3%
95.4%
Page 7 of39
-------
FY 2011
ACS
Code
FY 2011 National Water Program Guidance
Measure Text
Measure
Groups
**FY
2011
Budget
Target
FY 2011 Planning
Target
Regional
Aggregates
Region
1
Region
2
Region
3
Region
4
Region
5
Region
6
Region
7
Region
8
Region
9
Region
10
HQ
***SP
Proposed
Target (FY
2014)
* Measure categories include: OMB PA (OMB Program Assessment); BUD (Budget Measure); SG (State Grant Measure); SMM (Senior Management Measure); EQR (EPAStat Quarterly Report Measure); NPMStat (OW EPAStat measure), ARRA (Recovery Act Measure), and I
(Indicator Measure). ** FY 2011 Budget Target is from 4-year performance measure table in the FY 2011 Presidents Budget. *** Strategic Plan (SP) proposed targets are from the proposed EPA Strategic Plan, to be submitted to Congress in 2010.
FY 2005 BASELINE
96.0%
98.0%
97.2%
98.5%
963%
95.5%
93.0%
n/a
n/a
95.3%
92.8%
UNIVERSE (2006)
709,170
89,355
105,772
19,357
180,965
52,559
14,266
n/a
n/a
233,000
13,896
National Program Manager Comments
Universe changes annually. Per ACS, Region 9's FY 07 commitment reflects the inclusion of Guam, American Samoa, and the Northern Marianas for the first time. These territories have a higher percentage of
beach season day closures resulting in a lower commitment at the regional and national levels.
Universe equals the total number of beach season days that beaches were open. The National target for FY 2011 is higher than the regional aggregate target to be consistent with the FY 2011 budget target.
SS-1
Number and national percent, using a constant
denominator, of Combined Sewer Overflow
(CSO) permits with a schedule incorporated
into an appropriate enforceable mechanism,
including a permit or enforcement order, with
specific dates and milestones, including a
completion date consistent with Agency
guidance, which requires: 1) Implementation of
a Long Term Control Plan (LTCP) which will
result in compliance with the technology and
water quality-based requirements of the Clean
Water Act; or 2) implementation of any other
acceptable CSO control measures consistent
with the 1994 CSO Control Policy; or 3)
completion of separation after the baseline date,
(cumulative)
NPMStat
717
(84%)
732
77
72
220
18
304
n/a
22
1
3
15
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
702 (82%)
702
76
70
211
17
290
n/a
19
1
3
15
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
693 (81%)
693
76
67
206
17
294
n/a
14
1
3
15
FY 200S END OF YEAR RESULT
610(72%)
610
76
62
197
15
232
n/a
9
1
3
15
FY 200S BASELINE
536(63%)
75(91%)
51(48%)
175(74%)
9(38%)
200(55%)
n/a
7(29%)
1(100%)
3(100%)
15(100%)
UNIVERSE
853
82
106
236
24
362
n/a
24
1
3
15
National Program Manager Comments
Measure revised for FY 08. FY 07 numbers are based on a slightly different definition.
Beginning in FY 08, OECA and OWM agreed on common language and data collection procedures to streamline this measure. While the definition is slightly different for OWM, the past data is still valid for
comparison with future data. We have included a revised baseline to demonstrate the real progress for FY 08. While national numbers are fairly stable, the Regional baselines did change.
SS-2
Percent of all Tier I (significant) public beaches
that are monitored and managed under the
BEACH Act program.
SG
100%
97%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
95%
n/a
n/a
85%
93%
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
99%
97%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
95%
n/a
n/a
85%
93%
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
97.6%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
n/a
n/a
100%
81%
FY 200S END OF YEAR RESULT
99.1%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
n/a
n/a
100%
93%
FY 2005 BASELINE
96.5%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
92%
n/a
n/a
100%
80%
UNIVERSE
2,690
905
365
89
481
320
79
n/a
n/a
376
75
National Program Manager Comments
States may change their designation of beaches at any time. Therefore, these numbers may change from year to year.
""Universe for FY 2008 Tier I beaches may be adjusted.
Subobjective 2.2.1 Improve Water Qualify on a Watershed Basis
Number of waterbodies identified in 2002 as
not attaining water quality standards where
standards are now fully attained (cumulative)
OMB PA
BUD
SG
SMM
ARRA
227
72
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
Page 8 of39
-------
FY 2011
ACS
Code
FY 2011 National Water Program Guidance
Measure Text
Measure
Groups
**FY
2011
Budget
Target
FY 2011 Planning
Target
Regional
Aggregates
Region
1
Region
2
Region
3
Region
4
Region
5
Region
6
Region
7
Region
8
Region
9
Region
10
HQ
***SP
Proposed
Target (FY
2014)
* Measure categories include: OMB PA (OMB Program Assessment); BUD (Budget Measure); SG (State Grant Measure); SMM (Senior Management Measure); EQR (EPAStat Quarterly Report Measure); NPMStat (OW EPAStat measure), ARRA (Recovery Act Measure), and I
(Indicator Measure). ** FY 2011 Budget Target is from 4-year performance measure table in the FY 2011 Presidents Budget. *** Strategic Plan (SP) proposed targets are from the proposed EPA Strategic Plan, to be submitted to Congress in 2010.
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
2,165
84
87
358
418
528
144
226
222
45
53
UNIVERSE (2002)
39,503
6,710
1,805
8,998
5,274
4,550
1,407
2,036
1,274
1,041
6,408
National Program Manager Comments
FY 07 data from regional staff and is not reflected in ACS since this measure begins in 2008. FY 08 targets in the FY 09 Budget Congressional Justification and OMB PA are rounded to 1,550.
SP-10 differs from previous Measure L, since SP-10 uses an updated 2002 baseline. Note: 2000-2002 results equal 1,980 waters — not included above. The FY10 Planning Target is higher than the Regional
aggregrates because the planning target aligns with our target included in the FY11 President's budget.
SP-11
Remove the specific causes of waterbody
impairment identified by states in 2002.
(cumulative)
BUD
8,670
8,670
8,669
326
443
1,600
1,003
3205
410
341
470
419
452
9,200
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
8,512
257
391
1,575
1,003
3,205
410
332
470
419
450
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
7,530
224
384
1,403
912
2,666
395
324
465
310
447
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
6,723
217
243
1,232
912
2,665
346
240
465
303
100
UNIVERSE
69,677
8,826
2,567
13,958
9,374
10,155
3,005
4,391
3,502
2,742
11,157
National Program Manager Comments
FY 07 data from Regional staff and is not reflected in ACS since measure is new starting in FY 08.
SP-12
Improve water quality conditions in impaired
watersheds nationwide using the watershed
approach, (cumulative)
BUD
170
185
185
6
21
18
48
20
21
6
26
9
10
300
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
141
5
20
16
40
15
12
5
20
4
4
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
104
4
14
12
32
10
9
4
17
0
2
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
60
1
8
8
20
5
3
3
12
0
0
UNIVERSE
4,767
246
300
300
2,000
378
213
169
684
27
450
National Program Manager Comments
FY 07 data is from Regional staff and is not reflected in ACS since measure begins in FY 08.
SP-13
Ensure that the condition of the Nation's
wadeable streams does not degrade (i.e., there
is no statistically significant increase in the
percent of streams rated "poor" and no
statistically significant decrease in the streams
rated "good").
Deferred until 2012
Maintain or
Improve the
Baseline
FY 2006 BASELINE
28% good; 25%
fair; 42% poor
UNIVERSE
National Program Manager Comments
The Wadeable Streams Survey will be updated in 2011. There will be no reporting on this measure until 2012.
SP-14
Improve water quality in Indian country at
monitoring stations in tribal waters (i.e., show
improvement in one or more of seven key
parameters: dissolved oxygen, pH, water
temperature, total nitrogen, total phosphorus,
pathogen indicators, and turbidity),
(cumulative)
OMB PA
Long-
Term
Target
Deferred until 2012
75
UNIVERSE
1,661 (185)*
160(14)
14 (n/a)
n/a
37 (2)
729 (44)
68(1)
82 (4)
100(10)
203 (43)
268 (67)
National Program Manager Comments
There will be no reporting on this measure until 2012. ""Numbers in parentheses are the number of stations with suspected depressed water quality and restoration activities underway.
Note: EPA estimates that improvement is most attainable at 185 stations.
Page 9 of39
-------
FY 2011
ACS
Code
FY 2011 National Water Program Guidance
Measure Text
Measure
Groups
**FY
2011
Budget
Target
FY 2011 Planning
Target
Regional
Aggregates
Region
1
Region
2
Region
3
Region
4
Region
5
Region
6
Region
7
Region
8
Region
9
Region
10
HQ
***SP
Proposed
Target (FY
2014)
* Measure categories include: OMB PA (OMB Program Assessment); BUD (Budget Measure); SG (State Grant Measure); SMM (Senior Management Measure); EQR (EPAStat Quarterly Report Measure); NPMStat (OW EPAStat measure), ARRA (Recovery Act Measure), and I
(Indicator Measure). ** FY 2011 Budget Target is from 4-year performance measure table in the FY 2011 Presidents Budget. *** Strategic Plan (SP) proposed targets are from the proposed EPA Strategic Plan, to be submitted to Congress in 2010.
SP-15
By 2015, in coordination with other federal
agencies, reduce by 50 percent the number of
homes on tribal lands lacking access to basic
sanitation, (cumulative)
ARRA
I
Indicator
N/A
(Indicator)
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
18,985 (5.95%)
18,985
(5.95%)
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
28,052
28,052
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
data n/a
data/na
FY 2007 END OF YEAR RESULT
n/a
n/a
FY 2003 BASELINE
26,777
26,777
UNIVERSE
319,070
National Program Manager Comments
This measure involves coordination with other federal agencies. Measure is converted into an indicator for FY 2011 and supplemented by WQ-24.
WQ-la
Number of numeric water quality standards for
total nitrogen and for total phosphorus adopted
by States and Territories and approved by EPA,
or promulgated by EPA, for all waters within
the State or Territory for each of the following
waterbody types: lakes/reservoirs,
rivers/streams, and estuaries (cumulative, out of
a universe of 280)
SG
47
47
1
7
8
6
2
0
1
0
22
0
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
13
3
0
1
1
1
1
2
0
4
0
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
11
3
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
4
0
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
8
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
4
0
FY 2010 BASELINE
31
3
5
0
0
1
0
0
0
22
0
UNIVERSE
280
34
20
34
44
24
24
16
24
38
22
National Program Manager Comments
Measure revised in FY 2011. If a state or territory has adopted nutrient water quality standards for some, but not all of its applicable waters, it may be counted in both WQ-1 a and WQ-1 b.
WQ-lb
Number of numeric water quality standards for
total nitrogen and total phosphorus at least
proposed by States and Territories, or by EPA
proposed rulemaking, for all waters within the
State or Territory for each of the following
waterbody types: lakes/reservoirs,
rivers/streams, and estuaries (cumulative, out of
a universe of 280).
SG
58
58
3
7
9
8
4
0
3
0
24
0
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
32
3
4
2
6
5
5
1
3
3
0
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
32
3
4
2
6
5
5
1
3
3
0
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
35
3
3
3
6
6
5
3
4
1
1
FY 2010 BASELINE
31
3
5
0
0
1
0
0
0
22
0
UNIVERSE
280
34
20
34
44
24
24
16
24
38
22
National Program Manager Comments
Measure revised in FY 2011. If a state or territory has adopted nutrient water quality standards for some, but not all of its applicable waters, it may be counted in both WQ-1 a and WQ-1 b.
Page 10 of 39
-------
FY 2011
ACS
Code
FY 2011 National Water Program Guidance
Measure Text
Measure
Groups
**FY
2011
Budget
Target
FY 2011 Planning
Target
Regional
Aggregates
Region
1
Region
2
Region
3
Region
4
Region
5
Region
6
Region
7
Region
8
Region
9
Region
10
HQ
***SP
Proposed
Target (FY
2014)
* Measure categories include: OMB PA (OMB Program Assessment); BUD (Budget Measure); SG (State Grant Measure); SMM (Senior Management Measure); EQR (EPAStat Quarterly Report Measure); NPMStat (OW EPAStat measure), ARRA (Recovery Act Measure), and I
(Indicator Measure). ** FY 2011 Budget Target is from 4-year performance measure table in the FY 2011 Presidents Budget. *** Strategic Plan (SP) proposed targets are from the proposed EPA Strategic Plan, to be submitted to Congress in 2010.
WQ-lc
Number of States and Territories supplying a
full set of performance milestone information to
EPA concerning development, proposal, and
adoption of numeric water quality standards for
total nitrogen and total phosphorus for each
waterbody type within the State or Territory
(annual). (The universe for this measure is 56.)
SG
proposed
19
19
0
0
4
6
1
0
4
0
4
0
FY 2010 BASELINE
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
UNIVERSE
56
6
4
6
8
6
5
4
6
7
4
National Program Manager Comments
New measure for FY 2011.
WQ-2
Number of Tribes that have water quality
standards approved by EPA. (cumulative)
39
39
n/a
1
n/a
2
5
10
n/a
3
8
10
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
38
n/a
1
n/a
2
4
10
n/a
3
8
10
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
35
n/a
1
n/a
2
3
10
n/a
2
7
10
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
35
n/a
1
n/a
2
3
10
n/a
2
7
10
FY 2005 BASELINE
26
0
0
n/a
2
2
9
0
2
3
8
UNIVERSE
55
n/a
1
n/a
2
5
11
n/a
6
16
14
National Program Manager Comments
The universe reflects all federally recognized Tribes who have applied for "treatment in the same manner as a state" (TAS) to administer the water quality standards program (as of September 2007).
WQ-3a
Number, and national percent, of States and
Territories that within the preceding three year
period, submitted new or revised water quality
criteria acceptable to EPA that reflect new
scientific information from EPA or other
resources not considered in the previous
standards.
OMB PA
BUD
SG
64.3%
36
(64.3%)
37
1
3
3
8
5
4
4
4
3
2
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
37 (66%)
37
2
3
3
8
5
4
3
4
3
2
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
35
3
2
3
6
4
4
3
6
3
1
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
35 (62.5%)
3
2
4
5
4
5
2
5
3
2
FY 2005 BASELINE
38(68%)
4
1
4
7
5
4
2
4
4
3
UNIVERSE
56
6
4
6
8
6
5
4
6
7
4
National Program Manager Comments
*FY 05 and 06 end-of-year results are from the WAT A database.
WQ-3b
Number, and national percent of Tribes that
within the preceding three year period,
submitted new or revised water quality criteria
acceptable to EPA that reflect new scientific
information from EPA or other resources not
considered in the previous standards.
13
(37%)
13
n/a
1
n/a
2
2
1
n/a
1
4
2
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
16(46%)
16
n/a
1
n/a
2
2
3
n/a
1
5
2
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
17
17
n/a
1
n/a
2
3
2
n/a
2
4
3
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
19(61%)
n/a
1
n/a
2
1
5
n/a
2
4
4
FY 2005 BASELINE
12(40%)
n/a
n/a
n/a
1
1
5
0
2
0
3
UNIVERSE (FY08)
35
0
1
n/a
2
3
10
0
2
8
9
National Program Manager Comments
FY 08 universe for WQ-3b is the number of authorized tribes that have at least initial EPA approved water quality standards
as of September 2007.
Page 11 of 39
-------
FY 2011
ACS
Code
FY 2011 National Water Program Guidance
Measure Text
Measure
Groups
**FY
2011
Budget
Target
FY 2011 Planning
Target
Regional
Aggregates
Region
1
Region
2
Region
3
Region
4
Region
5
Region
6
Region
7
Region
8
Region
9
Region
10
HQ
***SP
Proposed
Target (FY
2014)
* Measure categories include: OMB PA (OMB Program Assessment); BUD (Budget Measure); SG (State Grant Measure); SMM (Senior Management Measure); EQR (EPAStat Quarterly Report Measure); NPMStat (OW EPAStat measure), ARRA (Recovery Act Measure), and I
(Indicator Measure). ** FY 2011 Budget Target is from 4-year performance measure table in the FY 2011 Presidents Budget. *** Strategic Plan (SP) proposed targets are from the proposed EPA Strategic Plan, to be submitted to Congress in 2010.
WQ-4a
Percentage of submissions of new or revised
water quality standards from States and
Territories that are approved by EPA.
OMB PA
BUD
SMM
NPMStat
85%
85%
74%
75%
85%
90%
87%
75%
75%
50%
79%
75%
50%
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
85%
73.4%
75%
85%
78%
87%
80%
75%
50%
79%
75%
50%
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
93.2%
75.0%
100.0%
83.0%
100.0%
100.0%
91.7%
55.0%
96.7%
97.0%
50.0%
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
92.5%
100%
96%
100%
88.6%
100%
85%
99%
90%
100%
33%
FY 2005 BASELINE
UNIVERSE (FY 08)
52
1
1
3
10
10
16
2
3
6
0
National Program Manager Comments
Based on submissions received in the 12 month period ending April 30 of the fiscal year. Partial approvals receive fractional credit. **FY 06 end-of-year data is from the WAT A database. Universe changes
annually based on number of water quality standards submissions.
WQ-5
Number of States and Territories that have
adopted and are implementing their monitoring
strategies in keeping with established schedules.
SG
56
56
6
4
6
8
6
5
4
6
7
4
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
56
56
6
4
6
8
6
5
4
6
7
4
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
56
6
4
6
8
6
5
4
6
7
4
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
53
6
4
6
8
6
5
4
3
7
4
FY 2005 BASELINE
51
6
3
6
6
6
3
4
6
7
4
UNIVERSE
56
6
4
6
8
6
5
4
6
7
4
National Program Manager Comments
"In keeping with established schedules" means that states include in their annual Section 106 Monitoring Initiative workplans specific actions that are intended to implement their monitoring strategies and that states
demonstrate that they are making a good faith effort to do these activities.
WQ-6a
Number of Tribes that currently receive funding
under Section 106 of the Clean Water Act that
have developed and begun implementing
monitoring strategies that are appropriate to
their water quality program consistent with
EPA Guidance, (cumulative)
170
177
6
1
n/a
2
32
20
4
15
60
37
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
158
158
6
1
n/a
2
29
14
4
15
50
37
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
134
6
0
n/a
1
29
14
2
19
30
33
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
101
6
0
n/a
1
24
14
2
4
18
32
FY 2005 BASELINE
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
UNIVERSE
242
6
1
n/a
5
32
40
5
23
93
37
National Program Manager Comments
A cumulative measure that counts tribes that have developed, submitted to the Region, and begun implementing water monitoring strategies that are consistent with the EPA 106 Tribal Guidance.
WQ-6b
Number of Tribes that are providing water
quality data in a format accessible for storage in
EPA's data system, (cumulative)
110
139
6
1
n/a
2
29
15
3
16
45
22
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
94
94
1
1
n/a
2
21
7
2
16
30
14
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
86
1
1
n/a
1
20
7
1
21
20
14
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
60
1
0
n/a
1
18
7
1
15
10
7
FY 2005 BASELINE
3
0
0
n/a
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
UNIVERSE
242
6
1
n/a
5
32
40
5
23
93
37
National Program Manager Comments
A cumulative measure that counts tribes that are providing surface water data electronically in a format that is compatible with the STORET/WQX system.
Page 12 of 39
-------
FY 2011
ACS
Code
FY 2011 National Water Program Guidance
Measure Text
Measure
Groups
**FY
2011
Budget
Target
FY 2011 Planning
Target
Regional
Aggregates
Region
1
Region
2
Region
3
Region
4
Region
5
Region
6
Region
7
Region
8
Region
9
Region
10
HQ
***SP
Proposed
Target (FY
2014)
* Measure categories include: OMB PA (OMB Program Assessment); BUD (Budget Measure); SG (State Grant Measure); SMM (Senior Management Measure); EQR (EPAStat Quarterly Report Measure); NPMStat (OW EPAStat measure), ARRA (Recovery Act Measure), and I
(Indicator Measure). ** FY 2011 Budget Target is from 4-year performance measure table in the FY 2011 Presidents Budget. *** Strategic Plan (SP) proposed targets are from the proposed EPA Strategic Plan, to be submitted to Congress in 2010.
WQ-7
Number of States and Territories that provide
electronic information using the Assessment
Database version 2 or later (or compatible
system) and geo-reference the information to
facilitate the integrated reporting of assessment
data, (cumulative)
45
45
6
4
6
6
6
3
2
6
4
2
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
45
45
6
4
6
6
6
3
2
6
4
2
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
44
6
4
4
7
6
3
2
6
4
2
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
42
5
4
5
7
5
3
1
6
4
2
UNIVERSE
56
6
4
6
8
6
5
4
6
7
4
National Program Manager Comments
Universe is fifty states and six territories, including the District of Columbia
WQ-8a
Number, and national percent, of TMDLs that
are established or approved by EPA [Total
TMDLs] on a schedule consistent with national
policy.
Note: A TMDL is a technical plan for reducing
pollutants in order to attain water quality
standards. The terms 'approved' and
'established' refer to the completion and
approval of the TMDL itself.
OMB PA
BUD
SMM
NPMStat
47,100
2,284
(72%)
2,267
205
40
585
337
325
192
108
185
50
240
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
2,592 (77%)
2,592
245
100
797
290
325
222
108
185
50
270
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
5,887 (162%)
5,887
340
126
3,413
675
530
186
49
178
80
310
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
9,135 (105%)
9,135
5,454
125
912
835
878
170
185
168
96
312
National Program Manager Comments
A TMDL is a technical plan for reducing pollutants in order to attain water quality standards. The terms 'approved' and 'established' refer to the completion and approval of the TMDL itself. Annual pace is the
number of TMDLs needed to be established consistent with national policy, i.e. generally within 13 years of listing of the water as impaired. * Cumulative total commitment numbers are calculated at about 80% of
pace for OMB PA. (Source: Office of Management and Budget, "Detailed Information on the Surface Water Protection Assessment," available at
http://www.whitehouse.gOv/omb/expectmore/detail/l 0004380.2005.html). Annual total numbers are memorialized and static whereas cumulative total OMB PA numbers are open to semi-annual updates.
Our FY 2011 targets are still draft numbers and do not represent final targets. Projecting state TMDL production numbers several months in advance continues to be a challenge when Regions have not yet engaged
the states in planning for 2011. We expect that the regions will work with states this summer to develop and finalize appropriate FY11 targets. Note that we may encounter challenges in setting the final FY11 targets
as states have suffered staff cutbacks and/or need to focus their efforts solely on consent decree TMDLs. We do recognize the importance of achieving
the target if at all possible and will work with Regional program staff to negotiate targets that come as close as possible to meeting the national goal.
WQ-8b
Number, and national percent, of approved
TMDLs, that are established by States and
approved by EPA [State TMDLs] on a schedule
consistent with national policy.
Note: A TMDL is a technical plan for reducing
pollutants in order to attain water quality
standards. The terms 'approved' and
'established' refer to the completion and
approval of the TMDL itself.
OMB PA
BUD
SG
41,611
2,023
(64%)
1,925
205
40
397
252
325
177
84
185
25
235
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
2,491 (76%)
2,491
245
100
794
270
325
198
84
185
25
265
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
5,829(162%)
5,829
340
126
3,413
661
530
146
49
178
76
310
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
8,973 (105%)
8,973
5,454
125
911
783
878
66
185
168
92
311
Page 13 of 39
-------
FY 2011
ACS
Code
FY 2011 National Water Program Guidance
Measure Text
Measure
Groups
**FY
2011
Budget
Target
FY 2011 Planning
Target
Regional
Aggregates
Region
1
Region
2
Region
3
Region
4
Region
5
Region
6
Region
7
Region
8
Region
9
Region
10
HQ
***SP
Proposed
Target (FY
2014)
* Measure categories include: OMB PA (OMB Program Assessment); BUD (Budget Measure); SG (State Grant Measure); SMM (Senior Management Measure); EQR (EPAStat Quarterly Report Measure); NPMStat (OW EPAStat measure), ARRA (Recovery Act Measure), and I
(Indicator Measure). ** FY 2011 Budget Target is from 4-year performance measure table in the FY 2011 Presidents Budget. *** Strategic Plan (SP) proposed targets are from the proposed EPA Strategic Plan, to be submitted to Congress in 2010.
National Program Manager Comments
A TMDL is a technical plan for reducing pollutants in order to attain water quality standards. The terms 'approved' and 'established refer to the completion and approval of the TMDL itself. Annual pace is the
number of TMDLs needed to be established consistent with national policy, i.e. generally within 13 years of listing of the water as impaired. * Cumulative total commitment numbers are calculated at about 80% of
pace for OMB PA. (Source: Office of Management and Budget, "Detailed Information on the Surface Water Protection Assessment," available at
http://www.whitehouse.gOv/omb/expectmore/detail/l 0004379.2005.html). Annual total numbers are memorialized and static whereas cumulative total OMB PA numbers are open to semi-annual updates.
Our FY 2011 targets are still draft numbers and do not represent final targets. Projecting state TMDL production numbers several months in advance continues to be a challenge when Regions have not yet engaged
the states in planning for 2011. We expect that the regions will work with states this summer to develop and finalize appropriate FY11 targets. Note that we may encounter challenges in setting the final FY11 targets
as states have suffered staff cutbacks and/or need to focus their efforts solely on consent decree TMDLs. We do recognize the importance of achieving
the target if at all possible and will work with Regional program staff to negotiate targets that come as close as possible to meeting the national goal.
WQ-9a
Estimated annual reduction in million pounds
of nitrogen from nonpoint sources to
waterbodies (Section 319 funded projects only).
OMB PA
BUD
8.5 million
8.5 million
8.5 million
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
8,500,000
8,500,000
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
9,100,000
9,100,000
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
11,300,000
11,300,000
FY 2005 BASELINE
3.7 million lbs
National Program Manager Comments
FY 05 baseline for a 6 month period only. Starting with FY 06, a full year of data reported. End-of-Year results are received mid-February of the following year.
WQ-9b
Estimated annual reduction in million pounds
of phosphorus from nonpoint sources to
waterbodies (Section 319 funded projects only).
OMB PA
BUD
4.5 million
4.5 million
4.5 million
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
4,500,000
4,500,000
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
3,500,000
3,500,000
FY 2009 COMMITMENT
4,500,000
4,500,000
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
3,500,000
3,500,000
FY 2005 BASELINE
558,000 lbs
National Program Manager Comments
FY 05 baseline for a 6 month period only. Starting with FY 06, a full year of data reported. End-of-Year results are received mid-February of the following year.
WQ-9c
Estimated annual reduction in million tons of
sediment from nonpoint sources to waterbodies
(Section 319 funded projects only).
OMB PA
BUD
700,000
700,000
700,000
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
700,000
700,000
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
2,300,000
2,300,000
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
2,100,000
2,100,000
FY 2005 BASELINE
1.68 million tons
National Program Manager Comments
FY 05 baseline for a 6 month period only. Starting with FY 06, a full year of data reported. End-of-Year results are received mid-February of the following year.
WQ-10
Number of waterbodies identified by States (in
1998/2000 or subsequent years) as being
primarily nonpoint source (NPS)-impaired that
are partially or fully restored, (cumulative)
OMB PA
SG
NPMStat
Long-
Term
250
222
24
13
22
44
27
19
24
22
8
19
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
188
188
19
10
19
50
22
12
20
16
5
15
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
147
16
6
16
36
18
11
16
13
3
12
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
97
13
6
9
24
11
8
14
6
2
4
FY 2005 BASELINE
15
1
0
2
5
3
0
4
0
0
0
Page 14 of 39
-------
FY 2011
ACS
Code
FY 2011 National Water Program Guidance
Measure Text
Measure
Groups
**FY
2011
Budget
Target
FY 2011 Planning
Target
Regional
Aggregates
Region
1
Region
2
Region
3
Region
4
Region
5
Region
6
Region
7
Region
8
Region
9
Region
10
HQ
***SP
Proposed
Target (FY
2014)
* Measure categories include: OMB PA (OMB Program Assessment); BUD (Budget Measure); SG (State Grant Measure); SMM (Senior Management Measure); EQR (EPAStat Quarterly Report Measure); NPMStat (OW EPAStat measure), ARRA (Recovery Act Measure), and I
(Indicator Measure). ** FY 2011 Budget Target is from 4-year performance measure table in the FY 2011 Presidents Budget. *** Strategic Plan (SP) proposed targets are from the proposed EPA Strategic Plan, to be submitted to Congress in 2010.
National Program Manager Comments
Regions report results. The universe is the estimated waterbodies impaired primarily by nonpoint sources from the 1998 (or 2000 if states did not have a 1998 list) 303(d) lists. Note that this universe shifts each
time a new 303(d) list is developed, so this figure is only an estimate. Only waters on the Success Story website (http://www.epa.gov/owow/nps/Success319/) are counted. Regional FY 06 end-of-year results not
from ACS. Only a national FY 06 end-of-year result shown in ACS. Indicator measure in FY 06.
WQ -
11
Number, and national percent, of follow-up
actions that are completed by assessed NPDES
(National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System) programs, (cumulative)
I
Indicator
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
229
229
26
18
22
23
40
17
18
27
15
23
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
216(100%)
216
26
18
21
23
34
15
18
26
13
22
FY 2007 END OF YEAR RESULT
62.0%
22
16
17
20
28
10
16
23
13
19
FY 2005 BASELINE
18.0%
6
5
4
9
16
2
6
3
1
2
UNIVERSE
100.0%
36
27
32
41
66
23
47
39
21
36
National Program Manager Comments
Regional annual commitments and action items are confirmed by HQ action item database. Assessed programs include 45 authorized states, 5 unauthorized states (MA, NH, NM, AK, ID), 1 authorized territory
(VI), 3 authorized territories (DC, PR, Pacific Island Territories), and 10 Regions (total of 64 programs) assessed through the Permits for Environmental Results (PER) program.
Universe of 298 includes all follow-up actions for which a schedule was established. The universe increases as additional action items are identified by the Regions and through HQ program review. An updated
universe will be available in March 2009.
WQ-12a
Percent of non- Tribal facilities covered by
NPDES permits that are considered current.
[Measure will still set targets and commitments
and report results in both % and #.]
89%
88.9%
80%
87%
89%
85%
89%
94%
94%
85%
75%
80%
106,052
106,426
1,430
2,721
16,526
15,908
15,813
24,569
16,928
5,061
1,895
5,575
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
89%
76%
87%
89%
90%
90%
94%
90%
85%
79%
80%
104,623
104,623
1,423
2,742
16,423
17,237
13,334
25,143
15,935
4,841
1,909
5,636
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
90% (102,196)
81.0%
89.0%
89.0%
91.0%
88.0%
97.0%
90.0%
83.0%
84.0%
83.0%
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
90% (105,089)
(73.5%)
1,165
(90%)
2,885
(86.9%)
15,710
(90.1%)
17,431
(85.5%)
12,660
(97.7%)
26,288
(91%)
16,384
(88%)
4,879
(88.6%)
2,407
(81.3%)
5,280
FY 2005 BASELINE
87.8% (96,851)
64%
94%
86%
87%
87%
93%
82%
87%
91%
77%
UNIVERSE
119,733
1,787
3,128
18,569
18,715
17,939
26,137
18,009
5,954
2,526
6,969
National Program Manager Comments
Targets, commitments, and results will be reported in both percent and number. This measure includes facilities covered by all permits, including State and EPA issued permits. Due to the shifting universe of
permitees, its is important to focus on the national percent. *FY 05 data not from ACS. Universe for WQ-12a is based on FY 2010 Commitments.
WQ-12b
Percent of tribal facilities covered by NPDES
permits that are considered current.
[Measure will still set targets and commitments
and report results in both % and #.]
88%
86.5%
100%
100%
n/a
100%
95%
90%
94%
92%
80%
64%
338
334
2
2
n/a
12
42
12
16
176
40
32
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
86%
86%
100%
100%
n/a
100%
95%
90%
100%
90%
79%
64%
333
333
2
2
n/a
12
40
12
16
176
40
33
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
83% (321)
100%
100%
n/a
92%
100%
92%
100%
91%
76%
46%
FY 2009 COMMITMENT
88%
(340/388)
100%
(2/2)
100%
(2/2)
n/a
100%
(13/13)
95%
(42/43)
90%
(9/10)
100%
(16/16)
95%
(188/198)
73%
(36/49)
61%
(34/56)
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
85% (329)
(100%) 2
(100%) 2
n/a
(100%) 13
(100%) 42
(100%) 10
(100%) 16
(95%) 189
(79%) 38
(30%) 17
FY 2005 BASELINE
80% (261)
0
2
n/a
16
37
8
1
140
41
16
UNIVERSE
386
2
2
n/a
12
44
13
16
196
51
50
National Program Manager Comments
Targets, commitments, and results will be reported in both percent and number. This measure includes facilities covered by all permits, including State and EPA issued permits. Due to the shifting universe of
permitees, its is important to focus on the national percent. (WQ-12b) FY 07 Region 8 commitment adjusted due to counting error. Universe for WQ-12b is based on FY2010 Commitments.
Page 15 of 39
-------
FY 2011
ACS
Code
FY 2011 National Water Program Guidance
Measure Text
Measure
Groups
**FY
2011
Budget
Target
FY 2011 Planning
Target
Regional
Aggregates
Region
1
Region
2
Region
3
Region
4
Region
5
Region
6
Region
7
Region
8
Region
9
Region
10
HQ
***SP
Proposed
Target (FY
2014)
* Measure categories include: OMB PA (OMB Program Assessment); BUD (Budget Measure); SG (State Grant Measure); SMM (Senior Management Measure); EQR (EPAStat Quarterly Report Measure); NPMStat (OW EPAStat measure), ARRA (Recovery Act Measure), and I
(Indicator Measure). ** FY 2011 Budget Target is from 4-year performance measure table in the FY 2011 Presidents Budget. *** Strategic Plan (SP) proposed targets are from the proposed EPA Strategic Plan, to be submitted to Congress in 2010.
WQ-13a
Number, and national percent, of MS-4s
covered under either an individual or general
permit.
I
Indicator
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
6,541
6,541
517
1227
1016
503
1813
526
284
250
179
226
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
7,080
7,080
517
1101
964
758
1813
161
257
384
584
541
UNIVERSE
Indicator
National Program Manager Comments
Data did not exist prior to 2007 for WQ-13 a & b.
WQ-13b
Number of facilities covered under either an
individual or general industrial storm water
permit.
I
Indicator
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
81,660
81,660
3,548
4,605
6,500
18,477
20,508
13,508
7,068
4,198
766
2,482
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
89,530
89,530
1,654
5,160
6,436
18,323
20,508
11,940
6,623
4,372
11,273
3,241
UNIVERSE
100%
National Program Manager Comments
Data did not exist prior to 2007 for WQ-13 a & b.
WQ-13c
Number of sites covered under either an
individual or general construction storm water
site permit.
I
Indicator
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
200,732
200,732
7,704
17,671
19,317
75,311
7,738
17,403
12,480
12,444
24,069
6,595
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
204,341
204,341
4,321
9,742
23,799
75,317
9,879
16,308
18,210
12,051
27,409
7,305
FY 2005 BASELINE
n/a
UNIVERSE
n/a
National Program Manager Comments
Data did not exist prior to 2007 for WQ-13c.
WQ-13d
Number of facilities covered under either an
individual or general CAFO permit.
I
Indicator
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
7,900
7,900
6
602
277
1,021
2,129
890
1,443
618
203
711
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
7,830
7,830
2
609
269
966
2,024
895
1,438
581
222
824
FY 2005 BASELINE
8,623
0
624
175
2,131
1,488
1,391
1,239
448
296
831
UNIVERSE
18,972
33
632
770
3,621
2,523
4,190
3,777
841
1,670
915
National Program Manager Comments
*FY 05 CAFO data is not from ACS Note: It is likely the Regions overestimated the number of CAFOs covered by a general permit in 2005.
WQ-14a
Number, and national percent, of Significant
Industrial Users (SIUs) that are discharging to
POTWs with Pretreatment Programs that have
control mechanisms in place that implement
applicable pretreatment standards and
requirements.
SG
21,458
21,417
1,314
1,639
1,733
3,460
4,964
1,990
995
647
4,088
587
99%
99.6%
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
21,298 (98%)
21,298
1,314
1,850
1,699
3,619
4,540
1,976
989
647
4,088
576
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
21,264 (99%)
21,264
1,314
1,756
1,728
3,601
4,540
1,997
1,006
658
4,088
576
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
21,830 (99%)
1,367
2,101
1,685
3,619
4,721
2,081
1,003
647
4,088
576
FY 2005 BASELINE
22,226 (97.8%)
1,589
1,882
1,790
3,932
4,899
2,132
829
592
4,019
562
UNIVERSE
21,710
1,397
1,665
1,734
3,460
4,976
2,010
1,009
658
4,214
587
National Program Manager Comments
All universe numbers are approximate as they shift from year to year.
Page 16 of 39
-------
FY 2011
ACS
Code
FY 2011 National Water Program Guidance
Measure Text
Measure
Groups
**FY
2011
Budget
Target
FY 2011 Planning
Target
Regional
Aggregates
Region
1
Region
2
Region
3
Region
4
Region
5
Region
6
Region
7
Region
8
Region
9
Region
10
HQ
***SP
Proposed
Target (FY
2014)
* Measure categories include: OMB PA (OMB Program Assessment); BUD (Budget Measure); SG (State Grant Measure); SMM (Senior Management Measure); EQR (EPAStat Quarterly Report Measure); NPMStat (OW EPAStat measure), ARRA (Recovery Act Measure), and I
(Indicator Measure). ** FY 2011 Budget Target is from 4-year performance measure table in the FY 2011 Presidents Budget. *** Strategic Plan (SP) proposed targets are from the proposed EPA Strategic Plan, to be submitted to Congress in 2010.
WQ-14b
Number, and national percent, of Categorical
Industrial Users (CIUs) that are discharging to
POTWs without Pretreatment Programs that
have control mechanisms in place that
implement applicable pretreatment standards
and requirements.
I
Indicator
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
1,315
1,315
45
72
68
299
542
124
81
36
6
42
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
1,363
1,363
44
68
67
316
580
120
84
36
6
42
FY 2005 BASELINE
91.2%
1,015
44
117
74
31
458
17
31
45
0
198
UNIVERSE
100%
1,602
45
72
75
321
630
120
243
42
6
48
National Program Manager Comments
All universe numbers are approximate as they shift from year to year.
WQ-15a
Percent of major dischargers in Significant
Noncompliance (SNC) at any time during the
fiscal year.
OMB PA
BUD
SG
22.5%
<15%
<15%
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
<22.5%
<22.5%
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
23.9%
39.8%
29.3%
18.4%
25.9%
19.1%
23.3%
34.4%
10.5%
19.8%
14.1%
23.9%
FY 2005 BASELINE
19.7%
25.0%
28.7%
15.0%
20.7%
17.7%
23.7%
17.7%
8.0%
13.7%
15.3%
UNIVERSE (FY 06)
6,643
426
582
757
1,345
1,167
1,087
396
260
347
276
National Program Manager Comments
HQ reports results by Region. FY 08 commitment for WQ-15a of <22.5% is a 3 yr. average that shows overall trends.
WQ-15b
Percent of major dischargers in Significant
Noncompliance (SNC) at any time during the
fiscal year, and of those, the number, and
national percent, discharging pollutant(s) of
concern on impaired waters.
I
Indicator
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
n/a
FY 2005 BASELINE
TBD
UNIVERSE
1,735 (1,041)
1,735
155
67
256
147
773
189
81
43
12
12
WQ-16
Number, and national percent, of all major
publicly-owned treatment works (POTWs) that
comply with their permitted wastewater
discharge standards, (i.e. POTWs that are not in
significant non-compliance)
OMB PA
BUD
ARRA
86%
86%
86%
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
4,256 (86%)
4,256 (86%)
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
n/a
n/a
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
3,645 (86%)
3,645 (86%)
FY 2005 BASELINE
3,670
3,670
UNIVERSE
4,238
4,238
National Program Manager Comments
*FY 06 end-of-year data not from ACS.
WQ-17
Fund utilization rate [cumulative loan
agreement dollars to the cumulative funds
available for projects] for the Clean Water State
Revolving Fund (CWSRF).
OMB PA
BUD
ARRA
94%
94.5%
94%
(90% base)
90%
ARRA
92%
(92% base)
96%
(base 95%)
95%
(95%
ARRA)
94%
ARRA
92%
ARRA
95%
ARRA
94%
95%
(90% base)
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
94.5%
94%
90%
92%
95%
92%
91%
92%
94.5%
93%
95%
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
98%
102%
90%
92%
102%
98%
94%
n/a
93%
109%
104%
Page 17 of 39
-------
FY 2011
ACS
Code
FY 2011 National Water Program Guidance
Measure Text
Measure
Groups
**FY
2011
Budget
Target
FY 2011 Planning
Target
Regional
Aggregates
Region
1
Region
2
Region
3
Region
4
Region
5
Region
6
Region
7
Region
8
Region
9
Region
10
HQ
***SP
Proposed
Target (FY
2014)
* Measure categories include: OMB PA (OMB Program Assessment); BUD (Budget Measure); SG (State Grant Measure); SMM (Senior Management Measure); EQR (EPAStat Quarterly Report Measure); NPMStat (OW EPAStat measure), ARRA (Recovery Act Measure), and I
(Indicator Measure). ** FY 2011 Budget Target is from 4-year performance measure table in the FY 2011 Presidents Budget. *** Strategic Plan (SP) proposed targets are from the proposed EPA Strategic Plan, to be submitted to Congress in 2010.
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
98%
107%
95%
94%
103%
96%
95%
93%
95%
103%
103%
FY 2005 BASELINE
94.7%
110%
94%
89%
95%
98%
91%
88%
91%
93%
98%
UNIVERSE (in billions)
$75.2
$7.5
$15.1
$6.5
$8.7
$15.8
$7.1
$4.0
$2.3
$6.0
$2.2
National Program Manager Comments
""Universe represents the funds available for projects for the CWSRF through 2007, in billions of dollars (i.e., the denominator of the measure). FY 2011 targets include two numbers: 1) total with ARRA and 2)
base (in parenthesis), unless noted otherwise.
WQ-19a
Number of high priority state NPDES permits
that are issued in the fiscal year.
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
OMB PA
BUD
SG
SMM
NPMStat
95%
700
568
7
30
130
72
90
47
119
50
15
8
710
709
12
30
142
120
110
51
119
62
22
41
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
1,026
1,026
16
42
125
253
204
122
164
56
36
8
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
930 (120%)
930
16
40
168
198
252
84
104
47
17
4
FY 2005 BASELINE
601 (104%)
601
9
22
21
91
265
125
32
22
3
11
UNIVERSE
709
12
30
142
120
110
51
119
62
22
41
National Program Manager Comments
In FY 2010, the measure will be revised to provide a universe of priority permits in time for the setting of national and regional commitments in September 2009, consistent with the Agency target and commitment
schedule. Regions will commit to issue a certain number of permits from the fixed universe of priority permits in FY 2010. The national target will be the sum of all Regional commitments. There will be no
percentage goal for this measure. The universe of priority permits will be updated annually.
HQ reports results by Region. WQ-19a conforms to 106 OMB PA measure. FY 2006 measure, formed prior to OMB PA, reported in 2 parts (non-tribal and tribal). FY 2006 results: 98.5% (non-tribal) & 63.2%
(tribal). FY 2007 measure reported in 3 parts (State issued, EPA non-tribal, and EPA tribal permits). *FY 2007 Regional commitments & results are not from ACS. **FY08 measure was reported as State Issue
(WQ-19a) and EPA issued (WQ-19b) priority permits. Starting in FY 2008, the universe of priority permits candidates is expanded to capture a larger universe of environmentally significant permits.
WQ-19b
Number of high priority state and EPA
(including tribal) NPDES permits that are
issued in the fiscal year.
BUD
95%
800
650
13
39
132
73
90
48
120
50
18
67
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
792
792
35
39
145
120
110
57
120
62
37
67
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
1,118
1,118
36
54
130
253
204
132
165
58
48
38
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
61 (109%)
313
9
14
1
1
255
3
0
3
1
26
FY 2005 BASELINE
59 (104%)
324
16
9
0
0
265
1
8
6
0
19
UNIVERSE
792
35
39
145
120
110
57
120
62
37
67
National Program Manager Comments
In FY 2010, the measure will be revised to provide a universe of priority permits in time for the setting of national and regional commitments in September 2009, consistent with the Agency target and commitment
schedule. Regions will commit to issue a certain number of permits from the fixed universe of priority permits in FY 2010. The national target will be the sum of all Regional commitments. There will be no
percentage goal for this measure. The universe of priority permits will be updated annually. HQ reports results by Region. WQ-19a conforms to Surface Water Protection OMB PA measure. FY 2006 measure,
formed prior to OMB PA, reported in 2 parts (non-tribal and tribal). FY 2006 results: 98.5% (non-tribal) & 63.2% (tribal). FY 2007 measure reported in 3 parts (State issued, EPA non-tribal, and EPA tribal
permits). *FY 2007 Regional commitments & results are not from ACS. **FY08 measure was reported as State Issue (WQ-19a) and EPA issued (WQ-19b) priority permits. Starting in FY 2008, the universe of
priority permits candidates is expanded to capture a larger universe of environmentally significant permits. Starting in FY 2009, WQ-19b will measure the sum of all priority permits (State issued and EPA issued inc]
WQ-20
Number of facilities that have traded at least
once plus all facilities covered by an overlay
permit that incorporates trading provisions with
an enforceable cap.
I
Indicator
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
406
407
80
25
165
30
22
1
0
0
61
23
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
368
368
80
1
152
30
22
1
0
3
60
19
FY 2007 END OF YEAR RESULT
127**
127
80
1
1
30
7
1
0
2
4
1
FY 2005 BASELINE
98**
98
79
0
1
8
3
0
0
0
6
1
UNIVERSE (FY 07)
365
80
25
127
30
87
1
0
2
8
5
Page 18 of 39
-------
FY 2011
ACS
Code
FY 2011 National Water Program Guidance
Measure Text
Measure
Groups
**FY
2011
Budget
Target
FY 2011 Planning
Target
Regional
Aggregates
Region
1
Region
2
Region
3
Region
4
Region
5
Region
6
Region
7
Region
8
Region
9
Region
10
HQ
***SP
Proposed
Target (FY
2014)
* Measure categories include: OMB PA (OMB Program Assessment); BUD (Budget Measure); SG (State Grant Measure); SMM (Senior Management Measure); EQR (EPAStat Quarterly Report Measure); NPMStat (OW EPAStat measure), ARRA (Recovery Act Measure), and I
(Indicator Measure). ** FY 2011 Budget Target is from 4-year performance measure table in the FY 2011 Presidents Budget. *** Strategic Plan (SP) proposed targets are from the proposed EPA Strategic Plan, to be submitted to Congress in 2010.
National Program Manager Comments
Note: WQ-20 was a two part measure in FY 07; (a) was a Target measure until early FY 07, and has subsequently been dropped. Universe is the number of dischargers covered under anNPDES permit that allows
trading. In FY 07, measure was: "Number of permits providing for trading... .and the number of dischargers that carried out trades." ***FY 07 end-of-year results are based on the number of dischargers that
carried out trades and are not from ACS.
*The trading measure counts all point source permitted facilities that have traded at least once using either individual or general permits that allow trading. Facilities covered under an overlay permit (sometimes
called an 'aggregate,' 'watershed,' 'bubble,' or 'umbrella' permit) that set an enforceable cap on specific pollutant discharges are all automatically counted as having traded.
WQ-21
Number of water segments identified as
impaired in 2002 for which States and EPA
agree that initial restoration planning is
complete (i.e., EPA has approved all needed
TMDLs for pollutants causing impairments to
the waterbody or has approved a 303(d) list that
recognizes that the waterbody is covered by a
Watershed Plan [i.e., Category 4b or Category
5m]). (cumulative)
I
Indicator
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
13,515
13,515
4,866
266
2,596
1,804
947
n/a
1,759
206
96
975
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
12,856
12,856
4,978
266
2,240
1,799
868
n/a
1,698
206
96
705
FY 2007 END OF YEAR RESULT
6,792
6,792
529
332
1,313
1,322
506
263
1,637
200
47
643
FY 2005 BASELINE
n/a
UNIVERSE (2002)
39,503*
39,503
6,710
1,805
8,998
5,274
4,550
1,407
2,036
1,274
1,041
6,408
National Program Manager Comments
For FY 2009, geo-referencing data will be requested for reported segments. Universe consists of waters identified as impaired in state submission in
to Region 6 universe.
2002. * Adjustments made to Region 3 FY 06 end-year result and
WQ-22a
Number of Regions that have completed the
development of a Healthy Watersheds Initiative
(HWI) Strategy and have reached an agreement
with at least one state to implement its portion
of the Region's HWI Strategy.
I
Indicator
FY 2010 BASELINE
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
UNIVERSE
n/a
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
National Program Manager Comments
New measure for FY 2011.
WQ-22b
Number of states that have completed at least 2
of the major components of a Healthy
Watershed Initiative assessment.
I
Indicator
FY 2010 BASELINE
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n/a
UNIVERSE
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
National Program Manager Comments
New measure for FY 2011.
WQ-23
Percent of serviceable rural Alaska homes with
access to drinking water supply and wastewater
disposal
OMB PA
BUD
91%
91%
100%
FY 2010 BASELINE
91%
UNIVERSE
N/A
National Program Manager Comments
New measure for FY 2011. Since this is a new measure, the baseline is the current year. The universe is not applicable since this units are percent of serviceable homes.
Page 19 of 39
-------
FY 2011
ACS
Code
FY 2011 National Water Program Guidance
Measure Text
Measure
Groups
**FY
2011
Budget
Target
FY 2011 Planning
Target
Regional
Aggregates
Region
1
Region
2
Region
3
Region
4
Region
5
Region
6
Region
7
Region
8
Region
9
Region
10
HQ
***SP
Proposed
Target (FY
2014)
* Measure categories include: OMB PA (OMB Program Assessment); BUD (Budget Measure); SG (State Grant Measure); SMM (Senior Management Measure); EQR (EPAStat Quarterly Report Measure); NPMStat (OW EPAStat measure), ARRA (Recovery Act Measure), and I
(Indicator Measure). ** FY 2011 Budget Target is from 4-year performance measure table in the FY 2011 Presidents Budget. *** Strategic Plan (SP) proposed targets are from the proposed EPA Strategic Plan, to be submitted to Congress in 2010.
WQ-24
Number of American Indian and Alaska Native
homes provided access to basic sanitation in
coordination with other federal agencies.
ARRA
SP
52,300
67,900
FY 2009 BASELINE
43,600
UNIVERSE
360,000
National Program Manager Comments
New measure for FY 2011, to supplement SP-15 in the NWPG and replace SP-15 in the new Strategic Plan.
Subobjective 2.2.2 Improve Coastal and Ocean Waters
2.2.2
Prevent water pollution and protect coastal and
ocean systems to improve national and regional
coastal aquatic system health on the
'good/fair/poor' scale of the National Coastal
Condition Report.
OMB PA
Long-
Term
2.8
2.8
2.8
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
2.8
2.8
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
2.4
2.4
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
2.4
2.4
FY 2004 BASELINE
2.3
2.3
UNIVERSE
5
5
National Program Manager Comments
Rating consists of a 5-point system where 1 is poor and 5 is good.
SP-16
Maintain aquatic ecosystem health on the
'good/fair/poor' scale of the National Coastal
Condition Report in the Northeast Region.
2.4
2.4
2.4
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
2.4
2.4
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
2
1.8
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
1.8
1.8
FY 2004 BASELINE
1.8
1.8
UNIVERSE
5
5
National Program Manager Comments
FY 07 end-of-year data not from ACS. (For Gulf of Mexico, see Subobjective 4.3.5)
SP-17
Maintain aquatic ecosystem health on the
'good/fair/poor' scale of the National Coastal
Condition Report in the Southeast Region.
3.6
3.6
3.6
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
3.6
3.6
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
4
3.8
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
3.8
3.8
FY 2004 BASELINE
3.8
3.8
UNIVERSE
5
5
National Program Manager Comments
FY 07 end-of-year data not from ACS. (For Gulf of Mexico, see Subobjective 4.3.5)
SP-18
Maintain aquatic ecosystem health on the
'good/fair/poor' scale of the National Coastal
Condition Report in the West Coast Region.
2.4
2.4
2.4
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
2.4
2.4
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
2
2
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
2
2
FY 2004 BASELINE
2
2
UNIVERSE
5
5
Page 20 of 39
-------
FY 2011
ACS
Code
FY 2011 National Water Program Guidance
Measure Text
Measure
Groups
**FY
2011
Budget
Target
FY 2011 Planning
Target
Regional
Aggregates
Region
1
Region
2
Region
3
Region
4
Region
5
Region
6
Region
7
Region
8
Region
9
Region
10
HQ
***SP
Proposed
Target (FY
2014)
* Measure categories include: OMB PA (OMB Program Assessment); BUD (Budget Measure); SG (State Grant Measure); SMM (Senior Management Measure); EQR (EPAStat Quarterly Report Measure); NPMStat (OW EPAStat measure), ARRA (Recovery Act Measure), and I
(Indicator Measure). ** FY 2011 Budget Target is from 4-year performance measure table in the FY 2011 Presidents Budget. *** Strategic Plan (SP) proposed targets are from the proposed EPA Strategic Plan, to be submitted to Congress in 2010.
National Program Manager Comments
FY 07 end-of-year data not from ACS. (For Gulf of Mexico, see Subobjective 4.3.5)
SP-19
Maintain aquatic ecosystem health on the
'good/fair/poor' scale of the National Coastal
Condition Report in Puerto Rico.
1.7
1.7
1.7
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
1.7
1.7
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
2
1.7
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
0
FY 2004 BASELINE
1.7
1.7
UNIVERSE
5
5
National Program Manager Comments
FY 07 end-of-year data not from ACS. (For Gulf of Mexico, see Subobjective 4.3.5)
SP-20
Percent of active dredged material ocean
dumping sites that will have achieved
environmentally acceptable conditions (as
reflected in each site's management plan and
measured through on-site monitoring
programs).
BUD
95%
95%
99%
100%
100%
100%
90%
n/a
100%
n/a
n/a
100%
100%
95%
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
98%
99%
100%
100%
100%
90%
n/a
100%
n/a
n/a
100%
100%
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
99%
100%
100%
100%
95%
n/a
100%
n/a
n/a
100%
100%
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
99%
100%
100%
100%
90%
n/a
100%
n/a
n/a
100%
100%
FY 2005 BASELINE
94% (60)
5
3
2
17
n/a
15
n/a
n/a
11
7
2010 UNIVERSE
65
5
3
2
19
n/a
15
n/a
n/a
11
10
National Program Manager Comments
FY 07 end-of-year data is shown numerically in ACS. Indicator measure in FY 07.
CO-2
Total coastal and non-coastal statutory square
miles protected from vessel sewage by "no
discharge zone(s)." (cumulative)
I
Indicator
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
33,966,989
33,966,990
1,897,585
821,490
41,711
1,775,702
29,248,806
1,280
0
162,560
17,856
0
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
6,100
6,100
1,241
276
80
1,830
2,606
2
n/a
n/a
65
0
FY 2009 BASELINE
52,607
52,607
2,511
1,271
65
2,775
45,701
2
0
254
28
0
UNIVERSE
163,129
163,129
6,453
5,995
7,882
24,128
55,419
9,905
568
1,749
9,883
41,145
National Program Manager Comments
This is the first reporting year in which both inland and coastal no discharge zones (NDZs) will be tracked. In addition, NDZs will be measured in area, not coastline miles. As a result, the "universe" will consist of
the total area of water eligible to be designated as a NDZ under the current regulations.
Measure revised for FY 09.
CO-3
Number of National Estuary Program priority
actions in Comprehensive Conservation and
Management Plans (CCMPs) that have been
completed, (cumulative)
I
Indicator
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
145
145
0
0
0
92
n/a
31
n/a
n/a
22
0
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
330
330
164
15
12
110
n/a
29
n/a
n/a
0
0
FY 2007 END OF YEAR RESULT
557
557
159
60
1
37
n/a
31
n/a
n/a
0
269
FY 2005 BASELINE
225
225
135
11
0
9
n/a
13
n/a
n/a
46
11
UNIVERSE
2,038
2,038
289
468
214
365
n/a
183
n/a
n/a
250
269
National Program Manager Comments
Page 21 of 39
-------
FY 2011
ACS
Code
FY 2011 National Water Program Guidance
Measure Text
Measure
Groups
**FY
2011
Budget
Target
FY 2011 Planning
Target
Regional
Aggregates
Region
1
Region
2
Region
3
Region
4
Region
5
Region
6
Region
7
Region
8
Region
9
Region
10
HQ
***SP
Proposed
Target (FY
2014)
* Measure categories include: OMB PA (OMB Program Assessment); BUD (Budget Measure); SG (State Grant Measure); SMM (Senior Management Measure); EQR (EPAStat Quarterly Report Measure); NPMStat (OW EPAStat measure), ARRA (Recovery Act Measure), and I
(Indicator Measure). ** FY 2011 Budget Target is from 4-year performance measure table in the FY 2011 Presidents Budget. *** Strategic Plan (SP) proposed targets are from the proposed EPA Strategic Plan, to be submitted to Congress in 2010.
CO-4
Dollar value of "primary" leveraged resources
(cash or in-kind) obtained by the NEP Directors
and/or staff in millions of dollars rounded to the
nearest tenth of a percent.
I
Indicator
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
$514.6
$514.6
$337.6
$14.8
$10.1
$65.6
n/a
$12.5
n/a
n/a
$21.0
$53.0
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
$160.9
$160.9
$12.4
$14.8
$6.0
$101.7
n/a
$8.3
n/a
n/a
$11.2
$6.5
FY 2007 END OF YEAR RESULT
$208.1
$208.1
$53.6
$2.8
$4.5
$114.7
n/a
$11.2
n/a
n/a
$10.3
$11.0
FY 2005 BASELINE
$158.8
$158.8
$12.3
$46.9
$7.7
$19.1
n/a
$4.5
n/a
n/a
$51.0
$17.3
UNIVERSE
n/a
National Program Manager Comments
(Dollars in millions and rounded to nearest tenth of a percent).
Note that "primary" leveraged dollars are those the National Estuary Program (NEP) played the central role in obtaining. An example of primary leveraged dollars would be those obtained from a successful grant
proposal written by the NEP.
FY 06 end-of-year data is not from ACS.
CO-5
Number of dredged material management plans
that are in place for major ports and harbors.
I
Indicator
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
38
38
5
3
8
2
n/a
14
n/a
n/a
3
3
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
37
37
5
1
7
2
n/a
14
n/a
n/a
2
6
FY 2007 END OF YEAR RESULT
30
30
8
1
5
2
6
n/a
n/a
2
6
FY 2005 BASELINE
15
15
2
1
2
0
3
n/a
n/a
2
5
UNIVERSE
104
104
10
3
8
18
28
14
n/a
n/a
12
11
National Program Manager Comments
*This number represents major coastal/Great Lakes ports/harbors (commercially significant/deep draft and regionally significant). Development of a dredged material management plan is not necessary or feasible
for all ports and harbors in the universe.
CO-6
Number of active dredged material ocean
dumping sites that are monitored in the
reporting year.
I
Indicator
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
38
38
2
1
2
6
n/a
11
n/a
n/a
6
10
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
28
28
1
2
2
6
n/a
4
n/a
n/a
4
9
FY 2007 END OF YEAR RESULT
33
33
5
3
3
5
n/a
5
n/a
n/a
3
9
FY 2005 BASELINE
n/a
15
2
1
2
0
n/a
3
n/a
n/a
2
5
UNIVERSE
61
61
5
3
2
19
n/a
14
n/a
n/a
11
7
National Program Manager Comments
CO-7
Maintain aquatic ecosystem health on the
"good/fair/poor" scale of the National Coastal
Condition Report in the Hawaii Region.
4.5
4.5
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
4.5
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
4.5
FY 2008 BASELINE
0
UNIVERSE
0
National Program Manager Comments
New measure starting in FY 2010
Page 22 of 39
-------
FY 2011
ACS
Code
FY 2011 National Water Program Guidance
Measure Text
Measure
Groups
**FY
2011
Budget
Target
FY 2011 Planning
Target
Regional
Aggregates
Region
1
Region
2
Region
3
Region
4
Region
5
Region
6
Region
7
Region
8
Region
9
Region
10
HQ
***SP
Proposed
Target (FY
2014)
* Measure categories include: OMB PA (OMB Program Assessment); BUD (Budget Measure); SG (State Grant Measure); SMM (Senior Management Measure); EQR (EPAStat Quarterly Report Measure); NPMStat (OW EPAStat measure), ARRA (Recovery Act Measure), and I
(Indicator Measure). ** FY 2011 Budget Target is from 4-year performance measure table in the FY 2011 Presidents Budget. *** Strategic Plan (SP) proposed targets are from the proposed EPA Strategic Plan, to be submitted to Congress in 2010.
CO-8
Maintain aquatic ecosystem health on the
"good/fair/poor" scale of the National Coastal
Condition Report in the South Central Alaska
Region
5.0
5.0
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
5.0
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
5.0
FY 2008 BASELINE
0
UNIVERSE
0
National Program Manager Comments
New measure starting in FY 2010
4.3.2
Working with partners, protect or restore
additional acres of habitat within the study
areas for the 28 estuaries that are part of the
National Estuary Program (NEP).
OMB PA
BUD
SMM
100,000
100,000
43,504
4,544
1,105
3,500
30,000
n/a
3,000
n/a
n/a
200
1,155
500,000
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
100,000
44,089
5,240
1,115
3,100
30,000
n/a
3,000
n/a
n/a
227
1,407
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
125,437
6,184
1,690
4,642
101,792
n/a
3,943
n/a
n/a
4,861
2,325
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
82,828
3,267
1,860
7,858.5
43,763.8
n/a
3,643
n/a
n/a
21,873
562.7
FY 2005 BASELINE
449,241
14,562
15,009
33,793
232,605
n/a
54,378
n/a
n/a
82,363
16,531
UNIVERSE
n/a
National Program Manager Comments
Note: This measure is under Goal 4 in the 2006-2011 Strategic Plan. FY 05 cumulative end-of-year regional data used for baseline is not from ACS. The FY10 Planning Target is higher than the Regional
aggregrates because the planning target aligns with our target included in the FY11 budget.
Subobjective 4.3.1 Increase Wetlands
SP-21
Working with partners, achieve a net increase
of acres of wetlands per year with additional
focus on biological and functional measures
and assessment of wetland condition.
Target deferred for
FY 2011
Target
deferred for
FY 2011
100,000 per
year
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
Commitment
deferred for FY
2010
Commitment
deferred for
FY 2010
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
n/a
n/a
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
32,000
32,000
FY 2005 BASELINE
32,000
32,000
UNIVERSE
National Program Manager Comments
FY 05 end-of-year data not from ACS. FY 06 result (estimated 64,000 acres) fell short based on simple extrapolation of most recent annual rate ('98-'04). The next Status and Trends Report (2011) should show a
continuation of upward trends. Data source: U.S. DOI, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2010. Status and Trends of Wetlands in the Conterminous United States 2005-2009, Washington, DC.
Qualifying language: The 2005-2009 reporting period of this measure reflects that the data: a) are published in 5-year increments, which creates a fixed numerical target until the next report publication; and b) are
already at least two years old upon publication. Thus, at any given time, reporting against this measure is never current.
SP-22
In partnership with the U. S. Army Corps of
Engineers, states and tribes, achieve 'no net
loss' of wetlands each year under the Clean
Water Act Section 404 regulatory program.
BUD
Nonet
loss
No Net Loss
No Net Loss
No Net Loss
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
No Net Loss
No Net Loss
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
No Net Loss
No Net Loss
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
data n/a
data n/a
Page 23 of 39
-------
FY 2011
ACS
Code
FY 2011 National Water Program Guidance
Measure Text
Measure
Groups
**FY
2011
Budget
Target
FY 2011 Planning
Target
Regional
Aggregates
Region
1
Region
2
Region
3
Region
4
Region
5
Region
6
Region
7
Region
8
Region
9
Region
10
HQ
***SP
Proposed
Target (FY
2014)
* Measure categories include: OMB PA (OMB Program Assessment); BUD (Budget Measure); SG (State Grant Measure); SMM (Senior Management Measure); EQR (EPAStat Quarterly Report Measure); NPMStat (OW EPAStat measure), ARRA (Recovery Act Measure), and I
(Indicator Measure). ** FY 2011 Budget Target is from 4-year performance measure table in the FY 2011 Presidents Budget. *** Strategic Plan (SP) proposed targets are from the proposed EPA Strategic Plan, to be submitted to Congress in 2010.
FY 2005 BASELINE
UNIVERSE
National Program Manager Comments
Data source: U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Wetland Status and Trends Report.
WT-1
Number of acres restored and improved, under
the 5-Star, NEP, 319, and great waterbody
programs (cumulative).
BUD
118,000
118,000
118,000
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
96,000
(revised to 110,00
in FY 11 Budget)
96,000
(revised to
110,00 in FY
11 Budget)
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
103,507
103,507
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
82,875
82,875
FY 2006 BASELINE
58,777
UNIVERSE
n/a
n/a
National Program Manager Comments
These acres may include those supported by Wetland 5 Star Restoration Grants, National Estuary Program, Section 319 grants, Brownfields grants, or EPA's Great Waterbodies Program
Commitment represents a cumulative total. Unexpected accomplishments in FY 06, particularly in the National Estuary Program, contributed significantly to the total number of wetland
acres restored and enhanced.
WT-2a
Number of states/tribes that have substantially
built or increased capacity in wetland
regulation, monitoring and assessment, water
quality standards, and/or restoration and
protection. (This is an annual reporting
measure.)
I
Indicator
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
22
22
6
0
5
3
4
0
1
0
1
2
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
22
22
6
0
5
3
0
1
1
3
1
2
FY 2007 END OF YEAR RESULT
25
25
6
0
5
8
1
1
1
0
1
2
FY 2005 BASELINE
20
20
6
0
3
7
0
0
1
3
0
0
UNIVERSE
50
50
6
2
5
8
6
5
4
6
4
4
National Program Manager Comments
Substantial progress to be shown in three of the six areas identified during the last 3 years (i.e. monitoring, regulation, restoration, water quality standards, mitigation compliance, and partnership building). *This is
not a true baseline since this measure is evaluated annually and is more akin to a rate than a cumulative measure.
WT-2b
Number of core elements (regulation,
monitoring and assessment, water quality
standards, or restoration and protection)
developed and implemented by (number) of
States/Tribes.
I
Indicator
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
39
39
8
0
n/a
0
22
0
1
0
3
5
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
24
24
8
0
0
0
5
0
1
3
2
5
FY 2007 END OF YEAR RESULT
11
11
0
0
n/a
0
3
0
1
0
2
5
FY 2005 BASELINE
n/a
UNIVERSE
579
579
9
7
0
6
36
68
9
27
146
271
National Program Manager Comments
Substantial progress to be shown in three of the six areas identified during the last 3 years (i.e. monitoring, regulation, restoration, water quality standards, mitigation compliance, and partnership building). *This is
not a true baseline since this measure is evaluated annually and is more akin to a rate than a cumulative measure.
WT-3
Percent of Clean Water Act Section 404
standard permits, upon which EPA coordinated
with the permitting authority (i.e., Corps or
State), where a final permit decision in FY 08
documents requirements for greater
environmental protection* than originally
proposed.
I
Indicator
Page 24 of 39
-------
FY 2011
ACS
Code
FY 2011 National Water Program Guidance
Measure Text
Measure
Groups
**FY
2011
Budget
Target
FY 2011 Planning
Target
Regional
Aggregates
Region
1
Region
2
Region
3
Region
4
Region
5
Region
6
Region
7
Region
8
Region
9
Region
10
HQ
***SP
Proposed
Target (FY
2014)
* Measure categories include: OMB PA (OMB Program Assessment); BUD (Budget Measure); SG (State Grant Measure); SMM (Senior Management Measure); EQR (EPAStat Quarterly Report Measure); NPMStat (OW EPAStat measure), ARRA (Recovery Act Measure), and I
(Indicator Measure). ** FY 2011 Budget Target is from 4-year performance measure table in the FY 2011 Presidents Budget. *** Strategic Plan (SP) proposed targets are from the proposed EPA Strategic Plan, to be submitted to Congress in 2010.
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
n/a
FY 2005 BASELINE
UNIVERSE
National Program Manager Comments
New starting in FY 08. Reported on by Regions and HQ. ** FY 07 end-of-year data not available till June 2008.
* "Requirements for greater environmental protection" are counted under this measure when EPA can document that its recommendations for improvement provided in one or more of the following issue areas were
incorporated into the final permit decision:
1. Demonstration of adequate impact avoidance, including:
a) Determination of water dependency; b) Characterization of basic project purpose; c) Determination of range of practicable alternatives; d) Evaluation of direct, secondary and cumulative impacts for practicable
alternatives; e) Identification of Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative; f) Compliance with WQS, MPRSA, ESA and/or toxic effluent standards; g) Evaluation of potential for significant
degradation.
2. Demonstration of adequate impact minimization
3. Determination of adequate compensation
Note: The documented permit decision can be in the form of an issued, withdrawn, or denied permit. The universe is the number of individual permits where EPA has the opportunity to comment (approximately
20,000/year). Regional priorities dictate the specific permits for which EPA submits comments. This number is typically less than 20,000.
WT-4
Number of states measuring baseline wetland
condition - with plans to assess trends in
wetland condition - as defined through
condition indicators and assessments
(cumulative).
21
25
5
0
4
1
2
1
3
4
1
4
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
21
21
4
0
4
1
2
1
3
4
1
1
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
20
3
0
4
1
2
1
2
4
1
2
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
14
2
0
5
1
2
1
1
1
0
1
FY 2005 BASELINE
UNIVERSE
National Program Manager Comments
By 2013, a state will document within an Integrated Water Quality Monitoring Report (IMR) the baseline condition of at least one wetland type for the entire state or all wetlands in one major river basin. States
may use either Level 1, 2, or 3 methods or the combined 3-Level approach. The state also has plans to re-survey for the purposes of evaluating trends. To maximize financial resources, states are encouraged to use a
probability survey design for measuring baseline condition.
Regions should coordinate with EPA HQ and reference the full definition for this measure to make a determination on whether a state is "on track" to meet this measure by 2013.
Measure revised for FY 09.
Subobjective 4.2.4 Sustain and Restore the U.S.-Mexico Border Environmental Health
SP-23
Loading of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD)
removed (cumulative million pounds/year) from
the U.S.-Mexico Border area since 2003.
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
OMB PA
24%
39
39
35.6
3.4
152.8
million
pounds
36
36
35
1
FY 2003 BASELINE
0
UNIVERSE
National Program Manager Comments
Measure revised in FY 2010. 2003 Baseline: zero pounds/year of BOD removed from U.S.-Mexico Border area waters as a result of new infrastructure projects.
SP-24
Number of additional homes provided safe
drinking water in the U.S.-Mexico border area
that lacked access to safe drinking water in
2003.
OMB PA
BUD
33,434
cumulative
300
300
300
0
45,434
cumulative
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
2,599
2,599
700
1,899
Page 25 of 39
-------
FY 2011
ACS
Code
FY 2011 National Water Program Guidance
Measure Text
Measure
Groups
**FY
2011
Budget
Target
FY 2011 Planning
Target
Regional
Aggregates
Region
1
Region
2
Region
3
Region
4
Region
5
Region
6
Region
7
Region
8
Region
9
Region
10
HQ
***SP
Proposed
Target (FY
2014)
* Measure categories include: OMB PA (OMB Program Assessment); BUD (Budget Measure); SG (State Grant Measure); SMM (Senior Management Measure); EQR (EPAStat Quarterly Report Measure); NPMStat (OW EPAStat measure), ARRA (Recovery Act Measure), and I
(Indicator Measure). ** FY 2011 Budget Target is from 4-year performance measure table in the FY 2011 Presidents Budget. *** Strategic Plan (SP) proposed targets are from the proposed EPA Strategic Plan, to be submitted to Congress in 2010.
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
1,584
1,584
1,584
0
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
5,162
5,162
5,162
0
FY 2003 BASELINE
0
FY 2003 UNIVERSE
98,515
National Program Manager Comments
Measure is regionally reported starting in FY 09. Indicator measure in FY 07.
2003 Baseline: zero additional homes provided safe drinking water in the U.S.-Mexico Border area.
2003 Universe: 98,515 known homes in the Mexico Border area lacking access to safe drinking water.
SP-25
Number of additional homes provided adequate
wastewater sanitation in the U.S.-Mexico
border area that lacked access to wastewater
sanitation in 2003.
OMB PA
BUD
345,675
cumulative
10,300
10,300
1,000
9,300
424,370
cumulative
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
100,720
100,720
100,000
720
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
43,594
43,594
39,477
4,117
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
31,686
31,686
31,686
0
FY 2003 BASELINE
0
FY 2003 UNIVERSE
690,723
National Program Manager Comments
Measure is regionally reported starting in FY 09. Indicator measure in FY 07.
2003 Baseline: zero additional homes provided wastewater sanitation the U.S.-Mexico Border area.
2003 Universe: 690,723 known homes in the U.S.-Mexico Border area lacking access to wastewater sanitation.
Subobjective 4.2.5 Sustain and Restore Pacific Island Territories
SP-26
Percent of population in the U. S. Pacific Island
Territories served by community water systems
that has access to continuous drinking water
meeting all applicable health-based drinking
water standards, measured on a four quarter
rolling average basis.
BUD
75%
75%
75%
95%
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
73%
73%
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
80%
80%
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
79%
79%
FY 2005 BASELINE
95% of American
Samoa; 10% of the
Commonwealth of
the Northern
Mariana Islands;
80% of Guam
UNIVERSE
National Program Manager Comments
New measure starting in FY 08.
Page 26 of 39
-------
FY 2011
ACS
Code
FY 2011 National Water Program Guidance
Measure Text
Measure
Groups
**FY
2011
Budget
Target
FY 2011 Planning
Target
Regional
Aggregates
Region
1
Region
2
Region
3
Region
4
Region
5
Region
6
Region
7
Region
8
Region
9
Region
10
HQ
***SP
Proposed
Target (FY
2014)
* Measure categories include: OMB PA (OMB Program Assessment); BUD (Budget Measure); SG (State Grant Measure); SMM (Senior Management Measure); EQR (EPAStat Quarterly Report Measure); NPMStat (OW EPAStat measure), ARRA (Recovery Act Measure), and I
(Indicator Measure). ** FY 2011 Budget Target is from 4-year performance measure table in the FY 2011 Presidents Budget. *** Strategic Plan (SP) proposed targets are from the proposed EPA Strategic Plan, to be submitted to Congress in 2010.
SP-27
Percentage of time that sewage treatment plants
in the U.S. Pacific Island Territories comply
with permit limits for biochemical oxygen
demand (BOD) and total suspended solids
(TSS).
BUD
63%
63%
63%
90%
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
62%
62%
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
65%
65%
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
67%
67%
FY 2005 BASELINE
59%
59%
UNIVERSE
National Program Manager Comments
New measure starting in FY 08.
SP-28
Percent of days of the beach season that
beaches in each of the U.S. Pacific Island
Territories monitored under the Beach Safety
Program will be open and safe for swimming.
BUD
82%
82%
82%
96%
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
80%
80%
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
81%
81%
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
80%
80%
FY 2005 BASELINE
84%
84%
UNIVERSE
National Program Manager Comments
New measure starting in FY 08.
Subobjective 4.3.3 Improve the Health of the Great Lakes
4.3.3
Improve the overall ecosystem health of the
Great Lakes by preventing water pollution and
protecting aquatic ecosystems.
OMB PA
23.4
23.4
23.4
23.5
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
23.0
23
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
23.9
23.9
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
23.7
23.7
FY 2005 BASELINE
21.5
21.5
UNIVERSE
40.0
40.0
National Program Manager Comments
Subobjective 4.3.3 provides a general indication of progress of numerous state and federal programs, with a specific focus on coastal wetlands, phosphorus concentrations, AOC sediment contamination, benthic
health, fish tissue contamination, beach closures, drinking water quality, and air toxics deposition.
SP-29
Cumulative percentage decline for the long
term trend in average concentrations of PCBs in
Great Lakes fish.
OMB PA
BUD
14%
14%
14%
5%
(old
measure)
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
5%
(old measure)
5%
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
6%
6%
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
6%
6%
FY 2005 BASELINE
UNIVERSE
Page 27 of 39
-------
FY 2011
ACS
Code
FY 2011 National Water Program Guidance
Measure Text
Measure
Groups
**FY
2011
Budget
Target
FY 2011 Planning
Target
Regional
Aggregates
Region
1
Region
2
Region
3
Region
4
Region
5
Region
6
Region
7
Region
8
Region
9
Region
10
HQ
***SP
Proposed
Target (FY
2014)
* Measure categories include: OMB PA (OMB Program Assessment); BUD (Budget Measure); SG (State Grant Measure); SMM (Senior Management Measure); EQR (EPAStat Quarterly Report Measure); NPMStat (OW EPAStat measure), ARRA (Recovery Act Measure), and I
(Indicator Measure). ** FY 2011 Budget Target is from 4-year performance measure table in the FY 2011 Presidents Budget. *** Strategic Plan (SP) proposed targets are from the proposed EPA Strategic Plan, to be submitted to Congress in 2010.
National Program Manager Comments
SP-29 indicates that PCBs in top predator fish (generally lake trout, but walleye in Lake Erie) at monitored sites is expected to continue an average annual decrease of 5%. A 2-year lag between measurement and
reporting means that the FY 09 target pertains to measurements made in 2007. *1990 baseline: Concentrations levels at stations in Lakes Superior [0.45 ppm], Michigan [2.72 ppm], Huron [1.5 ppm], Erie
[1.35ppm], & Ontario [2.18 ppm].
SP-31
Number of Areas of Concern in the Great Lakes
where all management actions necessary for
delisting have been implemented (cumulative)
OMB PA
I
Indicator
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
1
1
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
1
1
FY 2007 END OF YEAR RESULT
1
1
FY 2005 BASELINE
1
1
UNIVERSE
31
31
National Program Manager Comments
Measure changed to indicator starting in FY 2011. SP-31 identifies a cumulative target of taking all necessary management actions to delist 3 of the original 31 US or binational Areas of Concern. Only 1 AOC (in
New York) has been de-listed to date.
SP-32
Cubic yards (in millions) of contaminated
sediment remediated in the Great Lakes
(cumulative from 1997).
OMB PA
BUD
7.2 million
7.2 million
7.2 million
9.6 million
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
6.4 million
6.4 million
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
6 million
6 million
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
5.5 million
5.5 million
FY 2005 BASELINE
3.7million
3.7million
UNIVERSE
46 million
46 million
National Program Manager Comments
Universe identifies quantity of contaminated sediment estimated to require remediation as of 1997. This total has been revised from a previous estimate of 75 million cubic yards based on state-submitted
information and subsequent decisions, information verification, and actual remediations. Information lags behind (i.e. the 2007 commitment is for calendar year 2006 sediment remediation).
GL-5
Number of Beneficial Use Impairments
removed within Areas of Concern, (cumulative)
OMB PA
BUD
26
26
26
46
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
26
(20 in FY 2011
Pres Bud)
26
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
12
12
FY 2005 BASELINE
11
UNIVERSE
261
National Program Manager Comments
New measure added for FY 2009 from 2007 OMB PA review.
GL-6
Number of normative species newly detected in
the Great Lakes ecosystem.
BUD
1
1
n/a
n/a
1
FY 2005 BASELINE
1.3
UNIVERSE
181
National Program Manager Comments
New measure starting in FY 2011, added from the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative Action Plan.
GL-7
Number of multi-agency rapid response plans
established, mock exercises to practice
responses carried out under those plans, and/or
actual response actions (cumulative).
BUD
7
7
n/a
n/a
7
Page 28 of 39
-------
FY 2011
ACS
Code
FY 2011 National Water Program Guidance
Measure Text
Measure
Groups
**FY
2011
Budget
Target
FY 2011 Planning
Target
Regional
Aggregates
Region
1
Region
2
Region
3
Region
4
Region
5
Region
6
Region
7
Region
8
Region
9
Region
10
HQ
***SP
Proposed
Target (FY
2014)
* Measure categories include: OMB PA (OMB Program Assessment); BUD (Budget Measure); SG (State Grant Measure); SMM (Senior Management Measure); EQR (EPAStat Quarterly Report Measure); NPMStat (OW EPAStat measure), ARRA (Recovery Act Measure), and I
(Indicator Measure). ** FY 2011 Budget Target is from 4-year performance measure table in the FY 2011 Presidents Budget. *** Strategic Plan (SP) proposed targets are from the proposed EPA Strategic Plan, to be submitted to Congress in 2010.
FY 2005 BASELINE
0
UNIVERSE
n/a
National Program Manager Comments
New measure starting in FY 2011, added from the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative Action Plan.
GL-8
Percentage of beaches meeting bacteria
standards 95% or more of beach days.
BUD
87%
87 %
90%
n/a
88%
FY 2006 BASELINE
86%
UNIVERSE
100%
320
National Program Manager Comments
New measure starting in FY 2011, added from the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative Action Plan.
GL-9
Acres managed for populations of invasive
species controlled to a target level (cumulative).
BUD
1,500
1,500
n/a
n/a
1,500
FY 2005 BASELINE
0
UNIVERSE
n/a
National Program Manager Comments
New measure starting in FY 2011, added from the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative Action Plan.
GL-10
Percent of populations of native aquatic non-
threatened and endangered species self-
sustaining in the wild (cumulative).
BUD
35%
52/147
pop
35%
n/a
n/a
35%
57%
52
52
84
FY 2009 BASELINE
27%
UNIVERSE
147
National Program Manager Comments
New measure starting in FY 2011, added from the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative Action Plan. Numerator: # of populations of native aquatic non-T&E and non-candidate species that are self-sustaining in the
wild. Denominator: total # of native aquatic non-T&E and non-candidate populations. Baseline: 39/147 populations.
GL-11
Number of acres of wetlands and wetland-
associated uplands protected, restored and
enhanced (cumulative).
BUD
7,500
7,500
n/a
n/a
7,500
FY 2005 BASELINE
0
UNIVERSE
550,000
National Program Manager Comments
New measure starting in FY 2011, added from the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative Action Plan.
GL-12
Number of acres of coastal, upland, and island
habitats protected, restored and enhanced
(cumulative).
BUD
20,000
20,000
n/a
n/a
20,000
FY 2005 BASELINE
0
UNIVERSE
1,000,000
National Program Manager Comments
New measure starting in FY 2011, added from the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative Action Plan.
GL-13
Number of species delisted due to recovery.
BUD
1
1
n/a
n/a
1
FY 2005 BASELINE
0
UNIVERSE
28
National Program Manager Comments
New measure starting in FY 2011, added from the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative Action Plan.
Page 29 of 39
-------
FY 2011
ACS
Code
FY 2011 National Water Program Guidance
Measure Text
Measure
Groups
**FY
2011
Budget
Target
FY 2011 Planning
Target
Regional
Aggregates
Region
1
Region
2
Region
3
Region
4
Region
5
Region
6
Region
7
Region
8
Region
9
Region
10
HQ
***SP
Proposed
Target (FY
2014)
* Measure categories include: OMB PA (OMB Program Assessment); BUD (Budget Measure); SG (State Grant Measure); SMM (Senior Management Measure); EQR (EPAStat Quarterly Report Measure); NPMStat (OW EPAStat measure), ARRA (Recovery Act Measure), and I
(Indicator Measure). ** FY 2011 Budget Target is from 4-year performance measure table in the FY 2011 Presidents Budget. *** Strategic Plan (SP) proposed targets are from the proposed EPA Strategic Plan, to be submitted to Congress in 2010.
GL-14
Number of Areas of Concern in the Great Lakes
where all management actions necessary for
delisting have been implemented (cumulative).
BUD
3
3
n/a
n/a
3
6
FY 2005 BASELINE
1
UNIVERSE
31
National Program Manager Comments
New measure starting in FY 2011, added from the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative Action Plan.
Subobjective 4.3.4 Improve the Health of the Chesapeake Bay Ecosystem
SP-33
Percent of Submerged Aquatic Vegetation goal
of 185,000 acres achieved, based on annual
monitoring from prior year.
OMB PA
45
45
45
45% (83,250
acres)
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
Long Term
Measure
n/a
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
42%
(76,861 acres)
42%
(76,861
acres)
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
35%
(64,912 acres)
35%
(64,912
acres)
FY 2005 BASELINE
39% (72,945)
UNIVERSE
185,000 acres
National Program Manager Comments
Starting in 2008, the Agency no longer sets annual commitments for SAV (SP-33) due to the extreme variability in the annual results. Instead, EPA set a long term target of 45% goal achievement in 2011.
SP-34
Percent of Dissolved Oxygen goal of 100%
standards attainment achieved, based on annual
monitoring from the previous calendar year and
the preceding 2 years.
OMB PA
40
20
20
40% (29.92
cubic km)
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
Long Term
Measure
n/a
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
16% (12.27 km3)
16%
(12.27
km3)
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
12%
(8.98 km3)
12%
(8.98 km3)
FY 2005 BASELINE
30% (22.73 km)
UNIVERSE
100% (74.8 km3)
National Program Manager Comments
The DO measure (SP-34) was first used in the Agency's Strategic Plan in 2008 (however, the Chesapeake Bay Program has been reporting results for this measure for many years). Annual commitments are not
made due to the extreme variability in the annual results. Instead, EPA set a long term target of 40% goal achievement in 2011.
SP-35
Percent of goal achieved for implementation of
nitrogen reduction practices (expressed as
progress in meeting the nitrogen reduction goal
of 162.5 million pounds from 1985 levels to
achieve an annual cap load of 175 million lbs
(based on long-term average hydrology
simulations).
OMB PA
BUD
56%
56%
56%
60% (97.43
M lbs)
Page 30 of 39
-------
FY 2011
ACS
Code
FY 2011 National Water Program Guidance
Measure Text
Measure
Groups
**FY
2011
Budget
Target
FY 2011 Planning
Target
Regional
Aggregates
Region
1
Region
2
Region
3
Region
4
Region
5
Region
6
Region
7
Region
8
Region
9
Region
10
HQ
***SP
Proposed
Target (FY
2014)
* Measure categories include: OMB PA (OMB Program Assessment); BUD (Budget Measure); SG (State Grant Measure); SMM (Senior Management Measure); EQR (EPAStat Quarterly Report Measure); NPMStat (OW EPAStat measure), ARRA (Recovery Act Measure), and I
(Indicator Measure). ** FY 2011 Budget Target is from 4-year performance measure table in the FY 2011 Presidents Budget. *** Strategic Plan (SP) proposed targets are from the proposed EPA Strategic Plan, to be submitted to Congress in 2010.
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
52%
(84.44 M lbs)
52%
(84.44 M
lbs)
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
49% (79.01 M lbs)
49%
(79.01 M
lbs)
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
47% (75.6 M lbs)
47% (75.6
Mlbs)
FY 2005 BASELINE
41% (67 M lbs)
41% (67 M
lbs)
UNIVERSE
100% (162.5 M
lbs)
100%
(162.5 M
lbs)
National Program Manager Comments
All targets, commitments and results are calculated using outputs of the phase 4.3 watershed model progress run simulations in relation to the existing long-term reduction goal (162.5 M lbs). When the Bay TMDL
is finalized in Dec 2010, CBP will begin reporting targets, commitments and results using the phase 5.3 watershed model in relation to a new reduction goal.
SP-36
Percent of goal achieved for implementation of
phosphorus reduction practices (expressed as
progress in meeting the phosphorus reduction
goal of 14.36 million pounds from 1985 levels
to achieve an annual cap load of 12.8 million
lbs (based on long-term average hydrology
simulations).
OMB PA
BUD
70%
70%
70%
74% (10.62
Mlbs)
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
66%
(9.48 M lbs)
66%
(9.48 M
lbs)
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
65% (9.38 M lbs)
65% (9.38
Mlbs)
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
62% (8.9 M lbs)
62% (8.9
Mlbs)
FY 2005 BASELINE
58% (8.4 M lbs)
58% (8.4
M lbs)
UNIVERSE
100% (14.36 M
lbs)
100%
(14.36M
lbs)
National Program Manager Comments
All targets, commitments and results are calculated using outputs of the phase 4.3 watershed model progress run simulations in relation to the existing long-term reduction goal (14.36 M lbs). When the Bay TMDL
is finalized in Dec 2010, CBP will begin reporting targets, commitments and results using the phase 5.3 watershed model in relation to a new reduction goal.
SP-37
Percent of goal achieved for implementation of
sediment reduction practices (expressed as
progress in meeting the sediment reduction goal
of 1.69 million tons from 1985 levels to achieve
an annual cap load of 4.15 million tons (based
on long-term average hydrology simulations).
OMB PA
BUD
71%
68%
68%
83% (1.4 M
tons)
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
67%
(1.13 M tons)
67%
(1.13 M
tons)
Page 31 of 39
-------
FY 2011
ACS
Code
FY 2011 National Water Program Guidance
Measure Text
Measure
Groups
**FY
2011
Budget
Target
FY 2011 Planning
Target
Regional
Aggregates
Region
1
Region
2
Region
3
Region
4
Region
5
Region
6
Region
7
Region
8
Region
9
Region
10
HQ
***SP
Proposed
Target (FY
2014)
* Measure categories include: OMB PA (OMB Program Assessment); BUD (Budget Measure); SG (State Grant Measure); SMM (Senior Management Measure); EQR (EPAStat Quarterly Report Measure); NPMStat (OW EPAStat measure), ARRA (Recovery Act Measure), and I
(Indicator Measure). ** FY 2011 Budget Target is from 4-year performance measure table in the FY 2011 Presidents Budget. *** Strategic Plan (SP) proposed targets are from the proposed EPA Strategic Plan, to be submitted to Congress in 2010.
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
67%
(1.13 M tons)
64% (1.08
M tons)
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
64% (1.07 M tons)
64% (1.07
M tons)
FY 2005 BASELINE
54% (0.9 M tons)
54% (0.9
M tons)
UNIVERSE
100% (1.69 M
tons)
100%
(1.69 M
tons)
National Program Manager Comments
All targets, commitments and results are calculated using outputs of the phase 4.3 watershed model progress run simulations in relation to the existing long-term reduction goal (4.15 M tons). When the Bay TMDL
is finalized in Dec 2010, CBP will begin reporting targets, commitments and results using the phase 5.3 watershed model in relation to a new reduction goal.
CB-la
Percent of point source nitrogen reduction goal
of 49.9 million pounds achieved.
OMB PA
BUD
76%
76%
76%
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
74%
(36.92 M lbs)
74%
(36.92 M
lbs)
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
70% (34.9 M lbs)
70% (34.9
Mlbs)
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
69%
69%
FY 2005 BASELINE
60.95%
61%
UNIVERSE
100% (49.9 M
lbs/yr)
100%
(49.9 M
lbs/yr)
National Program Manager Comments
All targets, commitments and results are calculated in relation to the existing long-term reduction goal (49.9 M lbs). When the Bay TMDL is finalized in Dec 2010, CBP will begin reporting targets, commitments
and results in relation to a new reduction goal.
CB-lb
Percent of point source phosphorus reduction
goal of 6.16 million pounds achieved.
OMB PA
BUD
96%
96%
96%
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
96% (5.92 M lbs)
96% (5.92
Mlbs)
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
96% (5.92 M lbs)
96% (5.92
Mlbs)
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
87 %
87%
FY 2005 BASELINE
80%
80%
UNIVERSE
100% (6.16 M
lbs/yr)
100%
(6.16 M
lbs/yr)
National Program Manager Comments
All targets, commitments and results are calculated in relation to the existing long-term reduction goal (6.16 M lbs). When the Bay TMDL is finalized in Dec 2010, CBP will begin reporting targets, commitments
and results in relation to a new reduction goal.
CB-2
Percent of forest buffer planting goal of 10,000
miles achieved.
OMB PA
BUD
68%
68%
68%
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
65%
(6,522 miles)
65%
(6,522
miles)
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
62% (6,172 miles)
62%
(6,172
miles)
Page 32 of 39
-------
FY 2011
ACS
Code
FY 2011 National Water Program Guidance
Measure Text
Measure
Groups
**FY
2011
Budget
Target
FY 2011 Planning
Target
Regional
Aggregates
Region
1
Region
2
Region
3
Region
4
Region
5
Region
6
Region
7
Region
8
Region
9
Region
10
HQ
***SP
Proposed
Target (FY
2014)
* Measure categories include: OMB PA (OMB Program Assessment); BUD (Budget Measure); SG (State Grant Measure); SMM (Senior Management Measure); EQR (EPAStat Quarterly Report Measure); NPMStat (OW EPAStat measure), ARRA (Recovery Act Measure), and I
(Indicator Measure). ** FY 2011 Budget Target is from 4-year performance measure table in the FY 2011 Presidents Budget. *** Strategic Plan (SP) proposed targets are from the proposed EPA Strategic Plan, to be submitted to Congress in 2010.
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
57%
57%
FY 2005 BASELINE
38%
38%
UNIVERSE
100% (10,000
miles)
100%
(10,000
miles)
National Program Manager Comments
Based on preliminary results, it appears that we will meet the FY 2009 commitment for CB-2.
Subobjective 4.3.5 Improve the Health of the Gulf of Mexico
4.3.5
Improve the overall health of coastal waters of
the Gulf of Mexico on the "good/fair/poor"
scale of the National Coastal Condition Report.
BUD
2.6
2.6
2.6
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
2.5
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
2.2
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
2.2
FY 2004 BASELINE
2.4
UNIVERSE
5
National Program Manager Comments
The rating is based on five indicators of ecological condition: water quality index, sediment quality index, benthic index, coastal habitat index, and fish tissue contaminants index.
SP-38
Restore water and habitat quality to meet water
quality standards in impaired segments in 13
priority areas, (cumulative starting in FY 07)
BUD
128
128
160
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
96
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
131
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
data n/a
FY 2002 BASELINE
0
UNIVERSE
812
National Program Manager Comments
SP-38 replaces FY 07 measure GM-1. FY 07 end-of-year data not from ACS. Universe changed from 354 to 812.
SP-39
Restore, enhance, or protect a cumulative
number of acres of important coastal and
marine habitats, (cumulative starting in FY 07)
BUD
30,000
30,000
32,600
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
27,500
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
29,344
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
25,215
FY 2005 BASELINE
16,000
UNIVERSE
3,769,370 acres
National Program Manager Comments
Coastal habitat includes marshes, wetlands, tidal flats, oyster beds, seagrasses, mangroves, dunes and maritime forest ridge areas.
SP-40
Reduce releases of nutrients throughout the
Mississippi River Basin to reduce the size of
the hypoxic zone in the Gulf of Mexico, as
measured by the 5-year running average of the
size of the zone.
Commitment
deferred
5,000
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
Commitment
deferred
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
n/a
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
n/a
FY 2005 BASELINE
14,128 km2
UNIVERSE
n/a
Page 33 of 39
-------
FY 2011
ACS
Code
FY 2011 National Water Program Guidance
Measure Text
Measure
Groups
**FY
2011
Budget
Target
FY 2011 Planning
Target
Regional
Aggregates
Region
1
Region
2
Region
3
Region
4
Region
5
Region
6
Region
7
Region
8
Region
9
Region
10
HQ
***SP
Proposed
Target (FY
2014)
* Measure categories include: OMB PA (OMB Program Assessment); BUD (Budget Measure); SG (State Grant Measure); SMM (Senior Management Measure); EQR (EPAStat Quarterly Report Measure); NPMStat (OW EPAStat measure), ARRA (Recovery Act Measure), and I
(Indicator Measure). ** FY 2011 Budget Target is from 4-year performance measure table in the FY 2011 Presidents Budget. *** Strategic Plan (SP) proposed targets are from the proposed EPA Strategic Plan, to be submitted to Congress in 2010.
National Program Manager Comments
Targets/commitments are deferred for measure SP-40.
GM-1
Implement integrated bi-national (U.S. and
Mexican Border States) early-warning system
to support State and coastal community efforts
to manage harmful algal blooms (HABs).
Complete
operational system
in Campeche, MX
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
Expand operational
system to
Campeche, MX
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
Expanded system
FY 200S END OF YEAR RESULT
Pilot underway
FY 2005 BASELINE
UNIVERSE
National Program Manager Comments
Results are measured by the number of states that have timely access to data and information for detecting, tracking, and forecasting HAB events and their effects on public health, coastal economies, and natural
resources across the Gulf of Mexico.
Subobjective 4.3.6 Restore and Protect Long Island Sound
SP-41
Percent of goal achieved in reducing trade-
equalized (TE) point source nitrogen discharges
to Long Island Sound from the 1999 baseline of
59,146 TE lbs/day.
BUD
52%
52%
52%
100%
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
52%
52%
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
n/a
n/a
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
40,440 TE lbs/day
40,440 TE
lbs/day
FY 1999 BASELINE
211,724 lbs/day
211,724
lbs/day
UNIVERSE
National Program Manager Comments
New measure starting in FY 08. ""Measure will be tracked in lbs/day and Trade Equalized (TE) lbs/day. TE lbs/day are pounds of nitrogen adjusted by application of the equivalency factor assigned to each point
source based on its proximity to the receiving water body (LIS). The TMDL established a Waste Load Allocation of 22,774 TE lbs/day from point sources, to be achieved over a 15 year period beginning in 1999.
The annual commitments are calculated by dividing the difference between the 1999 baseline and 2014 target by 15 (the TMDL period), or 2,425 lbs/day per year. """The Baseline and 2014 Target have been
updated from the 2006-2011 Strategic Plan. FY 06 and FY 07 data not from ACS and has been updated.
SP-42
Reduce the size (square miles) and duration
(number of days) of observed hypoxia
(Dissolved Oxygen <3mg/l) in Long Island
Sound.
Commitment
deferred for FY
2011
Commitme
nt deferred
for FY
2011
156 square
miles and 43
days
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
Commitment
deferred for FY
2010
Commitme
nt deferred
for FY
2010
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
169 sq. miles; 45
days
169 sq.
miles; 45
days
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
180 sq. miles; 79
days
180 sq.
miles; 79
days
Page 34 of 39
-------
FY 2011
ACS
Code
FY 2011 National Water Program Guidance
Measure Text
Measure
Groups
**FY
2011
Budget
Target
FY 2011 Planning
Target
Regional
Aggregates
Region
1
Region
2
Region
3
Region
4
Region
5
Region
6
Region
7
Region
8
Region
9
Region
10
HQ
***SP
Proposed
Target (FY
2014)
* Measure categories include: OMB PA (OMB Program Assessment); BUD (Budget Measure); SG (State Grant Measure); SMM (Senior Management Measure); EQR (EPAStat Quarterly Report Measure); NPMStat (OW EPAStat measure), ARRA (Recovery Act Measure), and I
(Indicator Measure). ** FY 2011 Budget Target is from 4-year performance measure table in the FY 2011 Presidents Budget. *** Strategic Plan (SP) proposed targets are from the proposed EPA Strategic Plan, to be submitted to Congress in 2010.
FY 2005 BASELINE
187 sq miles; 58.6
days
187 sq
miles; 58.6
days
UNIVERSE
1,400 sq miles
(total) 122 days
(actually
monitored)
1,400 sq
miles
(total) 122
days
(actually
monitored
National Program Manager Comments
New measure starting in FY 08. Due to inter-annual variability, annual reduction targets are not calculated for this measure. *FY 07 end-of-year data not from ACS. Note on Universe: The 20 year average
measured maximum area of hypoxia in the Sound is 203 square miles and the duration average is 58 days.
SP-43
Percent of goal achieved in restoring, protecting
or enhancing 240 acres of coastal habitat from
the 2008 baseline of 1,199 acres.
BUD
50%
50%
50%
100%
(240 acres)
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
33%
(79 acres)
33%
(79 acres)
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
1,614
1,614
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
1,199
1,199
FY 2008 BASELINE
1,199 acres
restored &
protected
1,199 acres
restored &
protected
UNIVERSE
National Program Manager Comments
New measures starting in FY 08. For SP-43: In September 2006, the LISS Policy Committee established the goal of restoring and protecting an additional 300 acres of coastal habitat above the baseline by 2011 -
50 acres per year for 6 years. *FY 06 and FY 07 end-of-year data not from ACS. **The 2011 targets were achieved in 2007. EPA will negotiate new 2011 targets with the LISS Management Conference partners.
SP-44
Percent of goal achieved in reopening 50 river
and stream miles to diadromous fish passage
from the 2008 baseline of 124 miles.
BUD
50%
50%
50%
100%
(50 miles)
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
33%
(17 miles)
33%
(17 miles)
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
147
147
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
124.3
124.3
FY 2008 BASELINE
124 miles
124 miles
UNIVERSE
National Program Manager Comments
New measures starting in FY 08. For SP-44: The states of NY and CT will re-open 50 river miles above the base for a total of 131 river miles re-opened to fish passage. FY 07 end-of-year data not from ACS. The
2011 targets were achieved in 2007. EPA will negotiate new 2011 targets with the LISS Management Conference partners.
Subobjective 4.3.7 Restore and Protect the South Florida Ecosystem
SP-45
Achieve 'no net loss' of stony coral cover (mean
percent stony coral cover) in the Florida Keys
National Marine Sanctuary (FKNMS) and in
the coastal waters of Dade, Broward, and Palm
Beach Counties, Florida, working with all
stakeholders (federal, state, regional, tribal, and
local).
I
Indicator
No Net Loss
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
Loss
Loss
Page 35 of 39
-------
FY 2011
ACS
Code
**FY
***SP
FY 2011 National Water Program Guidance
Measure Text
Measure
Groups
2011
Budget
Target
FY 2011 Planning
Target
Regional
Aggregates
Region
1
Region
2
Region
3
Region
4
Region
5
Region
6
Region
7
Region
8
Region
9
Region
10
HQ
Proposed
Target (FY
2014)
* Measure categories include: OMB PA (OMB Program Assessment); BUD (Budget Measure); SG (State Grant Measure); SMM (Senior Management Measure); EQR (EPAStat Quarterly Report Measure); NPMStat (OW EPAStat measure), ARRA (Recovery Act Measure), and I
(Indicator Measure). ** FY 2011 Budget Target is from 4-year performance measure table in the FY 2011 Presidents Budget. *** Strategic Plan (SP) proposed targets are from the proposed EPA Strategic Plan, to be submitted to Congress in 2010.
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
Small change
Small
change
FY 2005 BASELINE
6.8% in FKNMS;
5.9% in SE Florida
6.8% in
FKNMS;
5.9% in SE
Florida
UNIVERSE
National Program Manager Comments
New measures starting in FY 08. Measure change to Indicator in FY 2011. Strategic Plan baseline of 6.7% was revised to 6.8%. The Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project (CREMP) for the Florida Keys
National Marine Sanctuary was modified in 2006 by dropping one hardbottom monitoring site because of the very small percentage of stony coral cover present (less than .2%), resulting in an increase of .1 percent
in the mean percent stony coral cover for the entire Sanctuary. Statistical analyses of the CREMP indicated that sampling a reduced number of stations at sites with low stony coral cover would still produce
statistically valid results.
SP-46
Annually maintain the overall health and
functionality of sea grass beds in the FKNMS
as measured by the long-term sea grass
monitoring project that addresses composition
and abundance, productivity, and nutrient
availability.
I
Indicator
Maintain
Baseline
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
Not maintained
Not
maintained
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
Small change
Small
change
FY 2005 BASELINE
EI = 8.3; SCI=0.48
EI = 8.3;
SCI=0.48
UNIVERSE
National Program Manager Comments
New measures starting in FY 08. Measure changed to Indicator in FY 2011. EI = Elemental Indicator; SCI =
Species Composition Index.
SP-47a
At least seventy five percent of the monitored
stations in the near shore and coastal waters of
the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary
will maintain Chlorophyll a(CHLA) levels at
less than or equal to 0.35 ug 1-1 and light
clarity( Kd)) levels at less than or equal to 0.20
m-1.
BUD
75%
75%
75%
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
FY 1995 2005 BASELINE
CHL A <0.35
ug/L (75.7%);
Kd^ 0.20m"1
(74.6%)
CHL A<
0.35 ug/L
(75.7%);
Kd<
0.20m-l
(74.6%)
UNIVERSE
154 Stations
154 Stations
National Program Manager Comments
New measure starting in FY 2011.
Page 36 of 39
-------
FY 2011
ACS
Code
FY 2011 National Water Program Guidance
Measure Text
Measure
Groups
**FY
2011
Budget
Target
FY 2011 Planning
Target
Regional
Aggregates
Region
1
Region
2
Region
3
Region
4
Region
5
Region
6
Region
7
Region
8
Region
9
Region
10
HQ
***SP
Proposed
Target (FY
2014)
* Measure categories include: OMB PA (OMB Program Assessment); BUD (Budget Measure); SG (State Grant Measure); SMM (Senior Management Measure); EQR (EPAStat Quarterly Report Measure); NPMStat (OW EPAStat measure), ARRA (Recovery Act Measure), and I
(Indicator Measure). ** FY 2011 Budget Target is from 4-year performance measure table in the FY 2011 Presidents Budget. *** Strategic Plan (SP) proposed targets are from the proposed EPA Strategic Plan, to be submitted to Congress in 2010.
SP-47b
At least seventy five percent of the monitored
stations in the near shore and coastal waters of
the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary
will maintain dissolved inorganic nitrogen
(DIN) levels at less than or equal to 0.75 uM
and total phosphorus (TP) levels at less than or
equal to .25 uM .
BUD
75%
75%
75%
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
FY 1995 2005 BASELINE
DIN <0..75 uM
(76.3%); TP
< 0.25uM (80.9%)
DIN <
0..75 uM
(76.3%);
TP <
0.25uM
(80.9%)
UNIVERSE
154 Stations
154 Stations
National Program Manager Comments
New measure starting in FY 2011.
SP-48
Improve the water quality of the Everglades
ecosystem as measured by total phosphorus,
including meeting the 10 parts per billion (ppb)
total phosphorus criterion throughout the
Everglades Protection Area marsh and the
effluent limits for discharges from storm water
treatment areas.
BUD
Maintain
phosphoru
s baseline
and meet
discharge
limits
Maintain
phosphorus
baseline and meet
discharge limits
Maintain
phosphorus
baseline
and meet
discharge
limits
Meet
phosphorus
criterion and
discharge
limits
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
Maintain
phosphorus
baseline and meet
discharge limits
Maintain
phosphorus
baseline
and meet
discharge
limits
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
Not maintained
Not
maintained
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
Not maintained
Not
maintained
FY 2005 BASELINE
UNIVERSE
National Program Manager Comments
New measure starting in FY 08. 2005 Baseline: Average annual geometric mean phosphorus concentrations were 5 ppb in Everglades National Park, 10 ppb in Water Conservation Area 3A, 13 ppb in Loxahatchee
National Wildlife Refuge, and 18 ppb in Water Conservation Area 2A; annual average flow — weighted total phosphorus discharges from Stormwater Treatment Areas ranged from 13 ppb for area 3/4 and 98 ppb for
area 1W.
SFL-1
Increase percentage of sewage treatment
facilities and onsite sewage treatment and
disposal systems receiving advanced
wastewater treatment or best available
technology as recorded by EDU. in Florida
Keys two percent (1500 EDUs) annually.
I
Indicator
Indicator
FY 2009 BASELINE
32,000
32,000
UNIVERSE
75,000
75,000
Page 37 of 39
-------
FY 2011
ACS
Code
FY 2011 National Water Program Guidance
Measure Text
Measure
Groups
**FY
2011
Budget
Target
FY 2011 Planning
Target
Regional
Aggregates
Region
1
Region
2
Region
3
Region
4
Region
5
Region
6
Region
7
Region
8
Region
9
Region
10
HQ
***SP
Proposed
Target (FY
2014)
* Measure categories include: OMB PA (OMB Program Assessment); BUD (Budget Measure); SG (State Grant Measure); SMM (Senior Management Measure); EQR (EPAStat Quarterly Report Measure); NPMStat (OW EPAStat measure), ARRA (Recovery Act Measure), and I
(Indicator Measure). ** FY 2011 Budget Target is from 4-year performance measure table in the FY 2011 Presidents Budget. *** Strategic Plan (SP) proposed targets are from the proposed EPA Strategic Plan, to be submitted to Congress in 2010.
National Program Manager Comments
New measure starting in FY 2011.
Subobjective 4.3.8 Restore and Protect the Puget Sound Basin
SP-49
Improve water quality and enable the lifting of
harvest restrictions in acres of shellfish bed
growing areas impacted by degraded or
declining water quality, (cumulative starting in
FY 06)
BUD
1,925
1,925
1,925
2,300
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
1,800
0
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
1,730
1,730
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
1,566
1,566
FY 2007 BASELINE
322
322
UNIVERSE
30,000 acres
National Program Manager Comments
New measures starting in FY 08. * Baseline
is the end-of-year data for FY 07.
SP-50
Remediate acres of prioritized contaminated
sediments, (cumulative starting in FY 06)
BUD
127
127
127
325
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
123
0
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
123.1
123.1
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
123
123
FY 2007 BASELINE
120
120
UNIVERSE
5,000 acres
5,000 acres
National Program Manager Comments
New measures starting in FY 08. * Baseline
is the end-of-year data for FY 07.
SP-51
Restore acres of tidally- and seasonally-
influenced estuarine wetlands, (cumulative
starting in FY 06)
BUD
7,250
7,250
7,250
9,500
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
6,500
6,500
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
5,751
5,751
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
4,413
4,413
FY 2007 BASELINE
4,152
4,152
UNIVERSE
45,000 acres
45,000
acres
National Program Manager Comments
New measures starting in FY 08. * Baseline
is the end-of-year data for FY 07.
Subobjective 4.3.9 Restore and Protect the Columbia River Basin
SP-52
Protect, enhance, or restore acres of wetland
habitat and acres of upland habitat in the Lower
Columbia River watershed, (cumulative starting
in FY 05)
BUD
16,300
16,300
16,300
19,000
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
16,000
16,000
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
15,700
15,700
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
12,986
12,986
FY 2005 BASELINE
UNIVERSE
96,770 acres
96,770
acres
National Program Manager Comments
New measure starting in FY 08. FY 07 end-of year adjusted data is not from ACS. Note: 13,000 wetland habitat acres and 3,000 upland habitat acres totals 16,000 acres.
Page 38 of 39
-------
FY 2011
ACS
Code
FY 2011 National Water Program Guidance
Measure Text
Measure
Groups
**FY
2011
Budget
Target
FY 2011 Planning
Target
Regional
Aggregates
Region
1
Region
2
Region
3
Region
4
Region
5
Region
6
Region
7
Region
8
Region
9
Region
10
HQ
***SP
Proposed
Target (FY
2014)
* Measure categories include: OMB PA (OMB Program Assessment); BUD (Budget Measure); SG (State Grant Measure); SMM (Senior Management Measure); EQR (EPAStat Quarterly Report Measure); NPMStat (OW EPAStat measure), ARRA (Recovery Act Measure), and I
(Indicator Measure). ** FY 2011 Budget Target is from 4-year performance measure table in the FY 2011 Presidents Budget. *** Strategic Plan (SP) proposed targets are from the proposed EPA Strategic Plan, to be submitted to Congress in 2010.
SP-53
Clean up acres of known contaminated
sediments, (cumulative starting in FY 06)
BUD
60
60
60
85
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
20
20
FY 2009 END OF YEAR RESULT
10
10
FY 2008 END OF YEAR RESULT
0
0
FY 2005 BASELINE
UNIVERSE
400 acres
400 acres
National Program Manager Comments
New measures starting in FY 08.
SP-54
Demonstrate a reduction in mean concentration
of certain contaminants of concern found in
water and fish tissue, (cumulative starting in FY
06)
BUD
10%
reduction
10% reduction
10%
reduction
10%
FY 2010 COMMITMENT
Commitment
deferred
Commitme
nt deferred
FY 2005 BASELINE
5 sites
5 sites
UNIVERSE
National Program Manager Comments
New measures starting in FY 08. There will be no reporting on SP-54 until 2012.
Page 39 of 39
------- |