ECMPS Reporting Instructions
Quality Assurance and Certification
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air and Radiation
Clean Air Markets Division
1201 Constitution Ave, NW
Washington, DC 20004
March 11, 2015
-------
-------
Table of Contents
March 11, 2015
Table of Contents
Page
1.0 INTRODUCTION: QUALITY ASSURANCE AND CERTIFICATION 1
1.1 Quality Assurance and Certification Root Element 5
1.2 Test Summary Data Elements 6
2.0 CEM Tests 10
2.1 7-Day Calibration Error Test 10
2.1.1 Test Summary Data Elements for 7-Day Calibration 12
2.1.2 Calibration Injection Data 16
2.2 Cycle Time Test 20
2.2.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Cycle Time Test 22
2.2.2 Cycle Time Summary Data 25
2.2.3 Cycle Time Injection Data 26
2.3 Linearity Check Data (SO:. NO ,. CO:. and 02) 29
2.3.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Linearity 33
2.3.2 Linearity Summary Data 37
2.3.3 Linearity Injection Data 39
2.3.4 Linearity Protocol Gas Data 41
2.4 I lei Linearity and 3-Level System Integrity Check Data 44
2.4.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Hg Linearity and System Integrity 47
2.4.2 Hg Summary Data 51
2.4.3 Hg Injection Data 53
2.5 Relative Accuracy Test Audit (RATA) 55
2.5.1 Test Summary Data Elements for RATA 61
2.5.2 RATA Data 64
2.5.3 RATA Summary Data 66
2.5.4 RATA Run Data 74
2.5.5 Flow RATA Run Data 77
2.5.6 RATA Traverse Data 81
2.5.7 RATA Test Qualification Data 85
2.5.8 RATA Protocol Gas Data 88
2.5.9 RATA A IK Emission Testing Data 91
2.6 Flow-to-Load Reference 93
2.6.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Flow-to-Load Reference 95
2.6.2 Flow-to-Load Reference Data 98
2.7 Flow-to-Load Check 101
2.7.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Flow-to-Load Check 104
2.7.2 Flow-to-Load Check Data 107
2.8 Online Offline Calibration Error Demonstration Ill
2.8.1 Test summary data Elements for Online Offline Calibration 113
2.8.2 Online Offline Calibration Data 117
3.0 Non-CEM Tests 122
3.1 Appendix E Correlation Test 122
3.1.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Appendix E Correlation Test 124
3.1.2 Appendix E Correlation Test Summary Data 127
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page i
-------
March 11, 2015
Table of Contents
3.1.3 Appendix E Correlation Test Run Data 128
3.1.4 Appendix E Heat Input from Oil Data 131
3.1.5 Appendix E Heat Input from Gas Data 134
3.1.6 Appendix E Protocol Gas Data 135
3.1.7 Appendix E Air Emission Testing Data 138
3.2 Fuel Flowmeter Accuracy Test 140
3.2.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Fuel Flowmeter Accuracy 142
3.2.2 Fuel Flowmeter Accuracy Data 145
3.3 Transmitter Transducer Test 147
3.3.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Transmitter Transducer Test 149
3.3.2 Transmitter Transducer Data 152
3.4 Fuel Flow-To-Load Baseline 154
3.4.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Fuel Flow-to-Load Baseline 156
3.4.2 Fuel Flow-to-Load Baseline Data 159
3.5 Fuel Flow-to-Load Test 163
3.5.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Fuel-Flow-to-Load Test 165
3.5.2 Fuel Flow-to-Load Test Data 168
3.6 Unit Default Test (LME) 170
3.6.1 Test Summary Data Elements for LME Unit Default Test 172
3.6.2 Unit Default Test Data 175
3.6.3 Unit Default Test Run Data 178
3.6.4 Unit Default Protocol Gas Data 180
3.6.5 Unit Default Air Emission Testing Data 182
4.0 Miscellaneous Tests 184
5.0 QA Certification Event Data 189
6.0 Test Extension Exemption Data 201
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page ii
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
Table of Contents
March 11, 2015
List of Tables
Page
Table 1 7-Day Calibration Test Reason Codes and Descriptions 13
Table 2 7-Day Calibration Test Result Codes and Descriptions 13
Table 3 Injection Protocol Codes and Descriptions 15
Table 4 Cycle Time Test Reason Codes and Descriptions 23
Table 5 Cycle Time Test Result Codes and Descriptions 23
Table 6 Linearity Test Reason Codes and Descriptions 34
Table 7 Linearity Test Result Codes and Descriptions 34
Table 8 Linearity Gas Level Codes and Descriptions 37
Table 9 PGVP Gas Type Codes and Descriptions 42
Table 10 Hg Linearity or 3-Level System Integrity Check Reason Codes and Descriptions 48
Table 11 Hg Linearity or 3-Level System Integrity Check Result Codes and Descriptions 48
Table 12 Linearity and 3-Level System Integrity Check Gas Level Codes and Descriptions .... 51
Table 13 RATA Test Reason Codes and Descriptions 62
Table 14 RATA Test Result Codes and Descriptions 62
Table 15 RATA Frequency Codes and Descriptions 65
Table 16 RATA Operating Level Codes and Descriptions 67
Table 17 Reference Method Codes for Gas System RATAs 67
Table 18 Reference Method Codes for Flow RATAs 69
Table 19 RATA Run Status Codes and Descriptions 76
Table 20 Reference Method Probe Type Codes and Descriptions 82
Table 21 Pressure Measure Codes and Descriptions 82
Table 22 RATA Test Claim Codes and Descriptions 86
Table 23 Flow-to-Load Test Result Codes and Descriptions 105
Table 24 Test Basis Indicator Codes and Descriptions for Flow-to-Load Check 107
Table 25 Online Offline Calibration Test Reason Codes and Descriptions 114
Table 26 Online Offline Calibration Test Result Codes and Descriptions 114
Table 27 Appendix E Test Reason Codes and Descriptions 125
Table 28 Oil GCV Units of Measure Codes and Descriptions 132
Table 29 Oil Volume Units of Measure Codes and Descriptions 133
Table 30 Oil Density Units of Measure Codes and Descriptions 133
Table 31 Fuel Flowmeter Accuracy Test Reason Codes and Descriptions 143
Table 32 Fuel Flowmeter Accuracy Test Result Codes and Descriptions 143
Table 33 Accuracy Test Method Codes and Descriptions 145
Table 34 Transmitter Transducer Test Reason Codes and Descriptions 150
Table 35 Transmitter Transducer Test Result Codes and Descriptions 150
Table 36 Accuracy Spec Codes and Descriptions 153
Table 37 Base Fuel Flow-to-Load Units of Measure Codes and Descriptions 161
Table 38 Baseline GHR Units of Measure Codes and Descriptions 161
Table 39 Fuel Flow-to-Load Test Result Codes and Descriptions 166
Table 40 LME Unit Default Test Reason Codes and Descriptions 173
Table 41 Fuel Codes and Descriptions for Unit Default Tests 175
Table 42 Unit Default Test Operating Condition Codes and Descriptions 177
Table 43 Miscellaneous Test Type Codes and Descriptions 185
Table 44 Miscellaneous Test Reason Codes and Descriptions 186
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page iii
-------
March 11, 2015
Table of Contents
Table 45 Miscellaneous Test Result Codes and Descriptions 187
Table 46 QA or Certification Event Codes and Descriptions 193
Table 47 Required Test Codes and Descriptions 197
Table 48 Fuel Codes and Descriptions for Test Extension Exemption 204
Table 49 Test Extension or Exemption Code 205
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page iv
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
Table of Contents
March 11, 2015
List of Figures
Page
Figure 1 Quality Assurance and Certification Data Complex Elements 4
Figure 2 Quality Assurance and Certification XML Elements 5
Figure 3 Test Summary Data XML Elements 8
Figure 4 7-Day Calibration Error Test XML Structure 10
Figure 5 Calibration Injection Data XML Elements 16
Figure 6 Cycle Time Test XML Structure 20
Figure 7 Cycle Time Summary Data XML Elements 25
Figure 8 Cycle Time Injection Data XML Elements 26
Figure 9 Linearity Checks XML Structure (Including: Test Summary Data, Linearity Summary
Data, and Linearity Injection Data) 29
Figure 10 Linearity Summary Data XML Elements 37
Figure 11 Linearity Injection Data XML Elements 39
Figure 12 Linearity Protocol Gas Data XML Elements 41
Figure 13 I k. Linearity/System Integrity Check XML Elements 44
Figure 14 Hg Summary Data XML Elements 51
Figure 15 Hg Injection Data XML Elements 53
Figure 16a RATA Test XML Structure 55
Figure 16b ADDITIONAL RATA XML Elements for Flow RAT As (Methods 2F and 2G, and
Method 2 using Method 2H Wall Effects Measurements) 56
Figure 17 RATA Data XML Elements 64
Figure 18 RATA Summary Data XML Elements 66
Figure 19 RATA Run Data XML Elements 74
Figure 20 Flow RATA Run Data XML Elements 77
Figure 21 RATA Traverse Data XML Elements 81
Figure 22 RATA Test Qualification Data XML Elements 85
Figure 23 RATA Protocol Gas Data XML Elements 88
Figure 24 RATA Air Emission Testing Data XML Elements 91
Figure 25 Flow-to-Load Reference Data XML Structure 93
Figure 26 Flow-to-Load Reference Data Elements 98
Figure 27 Flow-to-Load Check XML Structure 101
Figure 28 Flow-to-Load Check Data XML Elements 107
Figure 29 Online Offline Calibration Error Demonstration XML Structure Ill
Figure 30 Online Offline Calibration Data XML Elements 117
Figure 31 Appendix E Correlation Test XML Structure 122
Figure 32 App E Correlation Test Summary Data XML Elements 127
Figure 33 App E Correlation Test Run Data XML Elements 128
Figure 34 Appendix E Heat Input from Oil Data XML Elements 131
Figure 35 Appendix E Heat Input from Gas Data XML Elements 134
Figure 36 Appendix E Protocol Gas Data XML Elements 135
Figure 3 7 Appendix E Air Emission Testing Data XML Elements 138
Figure 38 Fuel Flowmeter Accuracy Test XML Structure 140
Figure 39 Fuel Flowmeter Accuracy Data XML Elements 145
Figure 40 Transmitter Transducer Accuracy Test XML Structure 147
Figure 41 Transmitter Transducer Data XML Elements 152
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page v
-------
March 11, 2015
Table of Contents
Figure 42 Fuel Flow-to-Load Baseline XML Structure 154
Figure 43 Fuel Flow-to-Load Baseline Data XML Elements 159
Figure 44 Fuel Flow-to-Load Test XML Structure 163
Figure 45 Fuel Flow-to-Load Test Data XML Elements 168
Figure 46 Unit Default Test XML Structure 170
Figure 47 Unit Default Test Data XML Elements 175
Figure 48 Unit Default Test Run Data XML Elements 178
Figure 49 Unit Default Protocol Gas Data XML Elements 180
Figure 50 Unit Default Air Emission Testing Data XML Elements 182
Figure 51 Miscellaneous Tests XML Structure 184
Figure 52 QA Certification Event Data XML Elements 189
Figure 53 Test Extension Exemption Data XML Elements 201
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page vi
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
1.0 Introduction: Quality Assurance and Certification
March 11, 2015
ECMPS Reporting Instructions
Quality Assurance and Certification
1.0 INTRODUCTION: Quality Assurance and Certification
About This Document
In the Emissions Collection and Monitoring Plan System (ECMPS), data must be submitted to
the EPA through the Client Tool using extensible-markup language (XML) format. XML files
must contain certain data elements, which are defined in the XML schema. (Note: more
information about the ECMPS XML Schemas can be found in the XML Schema Description
Documents.)
The purpose of the reporting instructions is to provide the necessary information for owners and
operators to meet the reporting requirements for sources affected by:
1) The Acid Rain Program (ARP);
2) The Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CASPR);
3) The Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS); and
4) Other programs required to report data using these XML schemas.
These instructions explain how to report the required data for the applicable regulations. Owners
and operators of units should refer to the applicable regulations for information about what data
are required to be reported.
The Quality Assurance and Certification XML Schema is made up of a root element, complex
elements, and simple elements. A simple element is a single piece of data. A complex element
is a group of simple elements which are logically grouped together. The root element is the base
of the XML schema.
The elements are related to each other in parent-child relationships. The root element is the
parent element of the entire schema. Complex elements are children of the root element, and
complex elements can also be children of other complex elements. If a complex element is
dependent on a parent complex element, the child complex element cannot be included in the
XML file unless the appropriate parent complex element is also included. Figure 1 below
illustrates the relationships between the QA and certification root element and the complex
elements.
This document provides instructions on how the required data should be reported using this data
structure. A separate section is provided for each complex element, its dependencies, and its
simple elements. In addition, there are "specific considerations" that apply to particular types of
monitoring plan configurations.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 1
-------
March 11, 2015
1.0 Introduction: Quality Assurance and Certification
About QA and Certification Data
QA and certification tests are required for all types of monitoring systems. Test extension or
exemption data indicate variances from prescribed testing requirements or extensions to the
normal QA testing schedule. QA or Certification Events (e.g., monitor replacements), as well as
data elements for submitting an electronic certification application when certifications are
required, are submitted when there is either diagnostic or recertification testing of specific
monitoring systems or components.
QA and Certification Reporting Guidelines
All certification, recertification, and periodic quality assurance tests that affect data validation
must be reported for each primary monitoring system, each redundant backup monitoring
system, and each non-redundant backup system used to report data. For routine QA tests and
diagnostics, the tests results may either be submitted prior to quarterly report submission period,
or with the quarterly emissions file whose hourly data are affected by the test(s). For initial
certification and recertification events, the test results must be submitted to EPA electronically
within 45 days of completing all required tests.
Certification, Recertification and Diagnostic Tests
For initial certifications, recertifications, and for certain diagnostic tests, you must submit a
corresponding QA Certification Event Data record along with the test results, to indicate the
event that triggered the need for the tests, and which QA tests were required for that event (refer
to the Part 75 Emissions Monitoring Policy Manual). Also you will need to submit a QA
Certification Event Data record whenever the conditional data validation procedures in
§75.20(b)(3) are used for routine QA tests.
Aborted Tests
Report all QA tests that are discontinued due to problems with the monitoring systems. Also
report the results of all trial RATA runs and gas injections that do not meet the acceptance
criteria in §75.20(b)(3)(vii)(E). These are regarded as failed tests and trigger out-of-control
periods.
However, do not report the results of tests that are discontinued for reasons unrelated to the
monitors' performance (e.g., due to process upsets, unit outages, or reference method failures).
And do not report the results of trial runs and gas injections that meet the acceptance criteria in
§75.20(b)(3)(vii)(E), which are part of the process of optimizing the performance of a continuous
emissions monitoring system (CEMS). The results of these tests are not used to establish the
validity of hourly emissions data. Simply keep a record of them in the unit's test log.
Entering Test Run Times
When entering test run times for QA tests, use the same frame of reference for entering the end
time as is used for the begin time. ECMPS assumes the run duration to be the difference
between the reported end time and begin time for a run. For example, if a run is begun at
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 2
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
1.0 Introduction: Quality Assurance and Certification
March 11, 2015
10:20:00 (hr:min:sec) and the run is 21 minutes long, ending at 10:40:59, then the begin time
should be reported as 10:20 and the end time should be entered as 10:41 and not 10:40.
Test Calculations
Whenever you perform QA test calculations that involve a number of steps in sequence (e.g.,
linearity error or percent relative accuracy calculations), begin the calculation sequence with the
raw data values reported in the XML (i.e., begin with flow rates that are rounded to the nearest
1000 scfh, gas concentrations that are rounded to the nearest 0.1 ppm, etc.). However, once you
have begun the calculation sequence, do not round off any of the intermediate values (such as the
mean difference, confidence coefficient, |R-A|, etc.). Rather retain the full decimal display of the
computer in the intermediate values until the final result is obtained and then round off the final
result. Similarly, do not use rounded intermediate values of statistical terms such as the standard
deviation, mean difference, and confidence coefficient when you perform a bias test of a CEMS
or determine a bias adjustment factor (BAF).
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 3
-------
March 11.2015
1.0 Introduction: Quality Assurance and Certification
Figure 1
Quality Assurance a>t> Certification Data Complex Elements
LEGEND
c
Parent^
Only J
6.0
Test Extension
Exemption Data
Quality Assurance and
Certification Data
3.2.2
Fuel Flowmeter
Accuracy Data
3.3.2
T ransmitter T ransducer
Accuracy Data
3.42
Fuel Flow To Load
Baseline Data
3.5.2
Fuel Flow To
Load Test Data
3.1.2
AppendixE
Correlation Test
Summary
Data .
5.0
OA Certification
Event Data
2.1.2
Calibration
Injection Data
Test
Summary Data
36.2
Unit Default
..Test Data.
3.1.4
AppendixE
Heat Input
From Gas
Data
3.1.5
AppendixE
Heat Input
From Oil
Data
27.2
Flow To Load
Check Data
2.6.2
Flow To Load
Reference Data
2.8.2
Online Offline
Calibration Data
2.3.2
Linearity
Summary
Data .
242
I Linearity and 3N
Level Summary^
Data
2.2.2
Cycle
Jime Summan
. Data,
2.5.6
RATA
Traverse
Data
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions — Page 4
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
1.1 Quality Assurance and Certification Root Element
March 11, 2015
1.1 Quality Assurance and Certification Root Element
Figure 2
Quality Assurance and Certification XML Elements
ORISCode
Version
'r.
TestSummaiyData [+]
QualrtyAs su ranee AndCert
>
' r.
QACertiTicationEventData ^
- -{^TestExtensionExernptionData [+J
Description of Data
The Quality Assurance and Certification record is the root element for the Quality
Assurance and Certification data XML schema. This element identifies the facility for which
QA test data are being reported. In addition, it provides information about the XML Version.
Include a single Quality Assurance and Certification record in each Quality Assurance and
Certification file.
Quality Assurance and Certification XML Elements
ORIS Code
Element Name: ORISCode
Report the code that indicates the unique identifying number given to a plant by the Energy
Information Administration (EIA).
Version
Element Name: Version
Report the XML schema version number. Note that this is a numeric field — do not include a "v"
before the number.
Environmental Protection Agency Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 5
-------
March 11, 2015
1.2 Test Summary Data Elements
1.2 Test Summary Data Elements
Description of Data
Submit one Test Summary Data record for each periodic quality assurance, certification, and
diagnostic test submitted as part of the Quality Assurance and Certification Test file. This
record summarizes each test performed and provides the test results, the reason for the
conducting each test, and other fundamental information about each test reported (e.g., Span
Scale).
Some tests are quite simple and all the relevant data are reported in the Test Summary Data
record. For example, a Data Acquisition and Handling System (DAHS) verification or Primary
Element Inspection (PEI) can be fully described in this record.
On the other hand, most tests have additional data such as gas injections or test runs that must be
linked to the Test Summary Data record. The more detailed test data (e.g., calibration
injections for a 7-day calibration error test) are provided in separate complex elements, as listed
below. Some of those dependent complex elements summarize the results that are specific to
one level of a test (e.g., Linearity Summary Data) and have additional detailed records linked
to them in dependent records defined in another complex element (e.g., Linearity Injection
Data). These relationships are depicted in the overall schematic (Figure 1) for QA
Certification Data provided on the third page of this document.
In addition to "tests" of monitors or systems, there are also related sets of data that are required to
qualify for a test or to use as a reference ratio for a test. These include the "reference" data for a
flow-to-load check, the baseline data for a fuel-flow-to-load check, and the qualification data
showing that only a single-load flow RATA is required based on the prior year's operation. This
information should also be reported in a Test Summary Data record and the related dependent
records.
Dependencies for Test Summary Data
The Test Summary Data record is dependent on the Quality Assurance and Certification
record.
The following complex elements specify additional test data and are dependent on the Test
Summary Data record:
• Linearity Summary Data
• Hg Summary Data
• RATA Data
• Flow-to-Load Reference Data
• Flow-to-Load Check Data
• Calibration Injection Data
• Cycle Time Summary Data
• Online Offline Calibration Data
• Fuel Flowmeter Accuracy Data
• Transmitter Transducer Data
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 6
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
1.2 Test Summary Data Elements
March 11, 2015
• Fuel Flow-to-load Baseline Data
• Fuel Flow-to-Load Test Data
• App E Correlation Test Summary Data
• Unit Default Test Data
• Test Qualification Data
• Protocol Gas Data
• Air Emission Testing Data
These complex elements cannot be submitted as part of a complete Quality Assurance and
Certification Data record unless an applicable Test Summary Data record is included.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 7
-------
March 11, 2015
1.2 Test Summary Data Elements
Figure 3
Test Summary Data XML Elements
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 8
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
1.2 Test Summary Data Elements March 11, 2015
Instructions for completing each element of the Test Summary Data record are included in the
following discussions of the individual test types.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 9
-------
March 11, 2015
2.1 7-Day Calibration Error Test
2.0 CEM Tests
2.1 7-Day Calibration Error Test
Figure 4
7-Day Calibration Error Test XML Structure
TntSwnmarylMft |
— TmtnypeCodo
S&ekPlpelO
"TeaUteserlpiew
'inlectionPrptocolCotte [
Include a Calibration
Injection Data record
(seven in all) for each set
of calibration error
injections performed as
part of the 7-day
calibration error test
*** - r- - a - '1 * - tfa. M r gJ
—j i&Cfl # |.
—fz«r5r>i#ct»oniiMi^
—j"zefclnjgetMtniite |'
CewglCesfii
-C
pr
3
'terelMNMUtvtfVMj*
1
iMMdVUu*
]
-~J^eroAPSInd««tof"|
—¦P^^»i)br»
-------
2.1 7-Day Calibration Error Test
March 11, 2015
Description of Data
Report the details of all 7-day calibration error tests performed for initial certification,
recertification, or diagnostic purposes, using Test Summary Data and seven Catibration
Injection Data records. For each day of the 7-day test, report the results of the zero and
upscale gas injections (or flow reference signals) in one Catibration Injection Data record.
All seven Catibration Injection Data records must be linked to the corresponding Test
Summary Data record for the 7-day calibration error test being reported.
Specific Considerations
Applicability of 7-Day Calibration Error Tests
• 7-day calibration error tests are reported on a component basis, and need only be reported
once per component, even if that component is shared among multiple systems.
• For moisture monitoring systems consisting of wet- and dry-basis O2 monitors, report
two 7-day calibration tests only if the wet and dry readings are obtained from two
different analyzers.
• For flow monitoring systems comprised of two flow monitor components, perform and
report a 7-day calibration test for each component.
• For dual range monitors, perform and report 7-day calibration tests at each range of the
instrument. Report 7-day calibration error tests for each range of a dual-range analyzer
as separate tests even if both ranges of the analyzer are identified by a single Component
ID.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 11
-------
March 11, 2015
2.1.1 Test Summary Data Elements for 7-Day Calibration Error Test
2.1.1 Test Summary Data Elements for 7-Day Calibration
Use the following instructions for completing each element of the Test Summary Data section
for the 7-day calibration error test.
Unit ID or Stack Pipe ID
Element Name: UnitID or StackPipelD
Report the Unit ID or Stack Pipe ID that corresponds to the location of the analyzer.
Test Type Code
Element Name: TestTypeCode
Report the test type code as "7DAY."
Monitoring System ID
Element Name: MonitoringSystemID
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to 7-day calibration error tests.
Component ID
Element Name: ComponentID
Report the three-character Component ID assigned to the analyzer.
Span Scale Code
Element Name: SpanScaleCode
Report the analyzer range of the component tested as "H" for high or "L" for low. For single
range monitors, report the scale as "H" unless you are using the default high range option, in
which case report the scale as "L."
Test Number
Element Name: TestNumber
At each monitoring location and for each test type, report a unique test number for each set of
records which comprises a single test. One method of tracking unique test numbers is to use the
Component ID as a prefix to the number. The test number may not be reused at this location for
another 7-day calibration error test.
Test Reason Code
Element Name: TestReasonCode
Report the purpose of the test using the appropriate code from Table 1.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 12
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.1.1 Test Summary Data Elements for 7-Day Calibration Error Test
March 11,2015
Table 1
7-Day Calibration Test Reason Codes and Descriptions
Code
Description
DIAG
Diagnostic
INITIAL
Initial Certification
REC'ERT
Recertification
Test Description
Element Name; TestDescription
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to 7-day calibration error tests.
Test Result Code
Element Name: TestResultCode
Report file appropriate code from Table 2 below to indicate the result of the test.
Table 2
7-Day Calibration Test Result (.'odes and Descriptions
Code
Description
ABORTED
Test was aborted due to problems with the installed monitoring system.
FAILED
Test was failed.
PASSED
Test was passed and the alternative performance specification was not used.
PASSAPS
Test was. passed using the alternative performance specification for one or more
injections.
Note that the monitoring system is considered out-of-control when a test is aborted due to a
problem with the CEMS. (If aborted due to problems with the reference method equipment, do
not report the test but keep a record of it in your test log.)
Begin Date
Element Name: BegimDate
Report the date of the first injection in the test.
Begin Hour
Element Name: Begin Hour
Report the hour of the first injection in the test.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions — Page 13
-------
March 11, 2015
2.1.1 Test Summary Data Elements for 7-Day Calibration Error Test
Begin Minute
Element Name: BeginMinute
Report the minute of the first injection in the test.
End Date
Element Name: EndDate
Report the date of the last injection in the test.
End Hour
Element Name: EndHour
Report the hour of the last injection in the test.
End Minute
Element Name: EndMinute
Report the minute of the last injection in the test.
Grace Period Indicator
Element Name: GracePeriodlndicator
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to 7-day calibration error tests.
Year
Element Name: Year
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to 7-day calibration error tests.
Quarter
Element Name: Quarter
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to 7-day calibration error tests.
Injection Protocol Code
Element Name: InjectionProtocolCode
This data element applies only to Hg CEMS. Report the appropriate code from Table 3 to
indicate the use of either elemental or oxidized NIST-traceable Hg standards.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 14
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.1.1 Test Summary Data Elements for 7-Day Calibration Error Test
March 11,2015
Table 3
Injection Protocol Codes and Descriptions
Code
Description
HGE
MST-TraceaMe Elemental Hg Standards as defined in Section 3.1.4,
Part 63, Subpart UUUUU, Appendix A.
HGO
NIST-Traceable Source of Oxidized Hg as defined in Section 3.1.5. Part
63. Subpart UUUUU. Appendix A.
Test Comment
Element Name: TestComment
Report a comment regarding the test if desired.
Environmental Protection Agency
Qualify Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions — Page 15
-------
March 11, 2015
2.1.2 Calibration Inj ection Data
2.1.2 Calibration Injection Data
Figure 5
Calibration Injection Data XML Elements
CaibratlonJnjection Dat
" On LineOffLinelndieator
" U pscaleGas LevelCode
"Zerolnje
"Zeroinjectloi
"UpscaielnjectionHour |
" UpscalelnjectionMinute |
" ZeroAPStndicator
' UpscateAPSIndicator
" ZeroCalibrattonError
"Upscale-
nErrc
" ZeroRefe re nee Value
Calibration Injection Data Elements
Use the following instructions for completing each element of the Calibration Injection Data
section. This section applies both to daily calibration error tests and to 7-day calibration error
tests.
Online Offline Indicator
Element Name: OnLineOffLinelndicator
This element indicates whether a test was performed while a unit was online or offline. Report a
" 1" if the test was performed while the unit was online. Report a "0" if the test was performed
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 16
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.1.2 Calibration Injection Data
March 11, 2015
while the unit was offline. For a 7-day calibration test, the unit must be online when the readings
are taken. For Hg monitors, all calibrations must be done while the unit is combusting fuel.
Upscale Gas Level Code
Element Name: UpscaleGasLevelCode
Report the code indicating the upscale level reference gas. Report "HIGH" if a high-level
calibration gas (80 to 100 percent of span) or a high-level flow monitor signal (50 to 70 percent
of span) is used. A mid-level calibration gas (50 to 60 percent of span) may be used in lieu of
the high-level gas. Report "MID" in this field if a mid-level gas is used.
The same two gas levels or signals must be used for all days of the test.
Zero Injection Date
Element Name: ZeroInjectionDate
Report the date when the zero-level gas injection was completed.
Zero Injection Hour
Element Name: ZeroInjectionHour
Report the hour when the zero gas injection was completed.
Zero Injection Minute
Element Name: ZeroInjectionMinute
Report the minute when the zero gas injection was completed. Because gas injections are
sequential and cannot be simultaneous, the time of zero-level and upscale injections must be
different.
Upscale Injection Date
Element Name: UpscalelnjectionDate
Report the date when the upscale gas injection was completed.
Upscale Injection Hour
Element Name: UpscalelnjectionHour
Report the hour when the upscale gas injection was completed.
Upscale Injection Minute
Element Name: UpscalelnjectionMinute
Report the minute when the upscale gas injection was completed. Because gas injections are
sequential and cannot be simultaneous, the time of zero-level and upscale injections must be
different.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 17
-------
March 11, 2015
2.1.2 Calibration Inj ection Data
Zero Measured Value
Element Name: ZeroMeasuredValue
Report the response of the gas analyzer to the zero-level calibration gas, in ppm for SO2 and
NOx, in |ig/scm for Hg, or in pet for CO2 and O2. For flow monitors, report the response of the
monitor to the zero-level reference signal.
Upscale Measured Value
Element Name: UpscaleMeasuredValue
Report the response of the gas analyzer to the upscale calibration gas, in ppm for SO2 and NOx,
in |j,g/scm for Hg, or in pet for CO2 and O2. For flow monitors, report the response of the
monitor to the upscale reference signal.
Zero APS Indicator
Element Name: ZeroAPSIndicator
Report whether the zero-level test result was determined using a normal specification "0" or the
alternative performance specification "1" allowed under Part 75, or, for Hg, under Appendix A to
40 CFR Part 63, Subpart UUUUU.
Appendix A to Part 75 specifies that the calibration error of an O2 or CO2 monitor is always
expressed in percent O2 or CO2, rather than as a percentage of span. This is considered to be the
"normal" calibration error specification; therefore, "0" should be reported in this field. The
alternate performance specification applies only to SO2, Hg, and NOx pollutant concentration
monitors that are considered low-emitters of those pollutants and to low-span differential
pressure flow monitors.
Upscale APS Indicator
Element Name: UpscaleAPSIndicator
Report whether the upscale test result was determined using a normal specification "0" or the
alternative performance specification "1" allowed under Part 75, or, for Hg, under Appendix A to
40 CFR Part 63, Subpart UUUUU. (See discussion under Zero APS Indicator for more details.)
Zero Calibration Error
Element Name: ZeroCalibrationError
Report the results of the zero-level calibration error test, as required by Part 75, or, for Hg, as
required by Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart UUUUU.
For SO2, Hg, NOx, and flow monitors, express the calibration error (CE) results either as a
percentage of the span value or (for low emitters of SC^and NOx, for low-span differential
pressure flow monitors, or for Hg monitors) as the absolute value of the difference between the
reference value and the measured value (i.e., |R - A|). If the calibration error meets the standard
specification, report the CE even though the test would also pass the alternative specification.
Only when the result does not pass the standard specification, but meets the alternative
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 18
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.1.2 Calibration Injection Data
March 11, 2015
specification, should you report |R - A|. If the test does not pass either specification, report the
CE.
For low-span differential pressure-type flow monitors using the alternative specification (because
the standard specification was not met): (1) report "0.0" in this field if the value of |R - A| is <
0.01 inches of water. If the value of |R - A| is > 0.01 inches of water, report the result as a
percentage of the span value (i.e., CE).
For CO2 and O2 monitors, express the result as an absolute percent CO2 or O2, since the results
are always determined as the absolute value of the difference between the reference value and
the measured value (i.e., |R - A|).
Upscale Calibration Error
Element Name: UpscaleCalibrationError
Report the results of the upscale calibration error test, as required by Part 75, or, for Hg, as
required by Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart UUUUU. (See the discussion under Zero
Calibration Error for more details.)
Zero Reference Value
Element Name: ZeroReference Value
Report the certified value of the zero-level reference calibration gas, in ppm for SO2 and NOx, in
|ig/scm for Hg, or in pet for CO2 and O2. Report the value of the reference signal, in the
appropriate units, for flow monitors.
Upscale Reference Value
Element Name: UpscaleReference Value
Report the certified value of the upscale reference calibration gas, in ppm for SO2 and NOx, in
|ig/scm for Hg, or in pet for CO2 and O2. Report the value of the reference signal, in the
appropriate units, for flow monitors.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 19
-------
March 11, 2015
2.2 Cycle Time Test
2.2 Cycle Time Test
Figure 6
Cycle Time Test XML Structure
—pTe«Mt»ntM« |
—{"TwHcMonCode"
—-pTa«roe»tflpBen! |
—FlnJecbonProtocolCode I
Include only on* Cycle
Time Summary Data
A,— rjC
¦i r
)
I«hA to »!««]» sal
downKth Cycle Tbm
far
1
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 20
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.2 Cycle Time Test
March 11, 2015
Description of Data
Except for integrated batch sampling-type Hg monitors, the Cycle Time Test is required for
initial certification of a gas monitor and may be required for recertification or as a diagnostic
test. The Cycle Time Test is not a required periodic quality assurance test under Appendix B to
Part 75 or (for Hg monitors) under Appendix A to Part 63, Subpart UUUUU. Perform the cycle
time test according to the procedures under 40 CFR Part 75, Appendix A, Section 6.4 or (for Hg
monitors) according to section 4.1.1.4 of Appendix A to Part 63, Subpart UUUUU. The cycle
time calculation method illustrated in the example diagrams in section 6.4 of Part 75, Appendix
A applies to all types of gas monitors (including Hg monitors).
Submit one Test Summary Data record and its associated Cycle Time Summary Data record
for each Cycle Time Test performed on a component. Separate Cycle Time Injection Data
records are required for the upscale and downscale tests for each analyzer component.
Specific Considerations
Applicability of Cycle Time Tests
• For a dual-range analyzer, report the results of cycle time testing against each range of
the analyzer as two separate tests, even if both ranges of the analyzer are identified by a
single Component ID.
• For a NOx-diluent system, the entire system would be considered out of control (OOC) if
either the NOx or the diluent component fails a cycle time test.
• If you perform an "abbreviated" cycle time test as a diagnostic (refer to the Part 75
Emissions Monitoring Policy Manual), do not report the results of this test electronically.
Keep the data and test results on-site, in a format suitable for audit and inspection.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 21
-------
March 11, 2015
2.2.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Cycle Time Test
2.2.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Cycle Time Test
Use the following instructions for completing each element of the Test Summary Data record
for a cycle time test.
Unit ID or Stack Pipe ID
Element Name: UnitID or StackPipelD
Report the Unit ID or Stack Pipe ID that corresponds to the location of the analyzer.
Test Type Code
Element Name: TestTypeCode
Report the test type code as "CYCLE."
Monitoring System ID
Element Name: MonitoringSystemID
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to cycle time tests.
Component ID
Element Name: ComponentID
Report the three-character Component ID assigned to the analyzer.
Span Scale Code
Element Name: SpanScaleCode
Report the analyzer range of the component tested as "H" for high or "L" for low. For single
range monitors, report the scale as "H" unless you are using the default high range option, in
which case report the scale as "L". For Hg monitors, report the scale as "H".
Test Number
Element Name: TestNumber
At each monitoring location and for each test type, report a unique test number for each set of
records which comprises a single test. One method of tracking unique test numbers is to use the
Component ID as a prefix to the number. The test number may not be reused at this location for
another cycle time test.
Test Reason Code
Element Name: TestReasonCode
Report the purpose of the test using the appropriate code from Table 4.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 22
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2,2,1 Test Summary Data Elements for Cycle Time Test
March 11,2015
Table 4
Cycle Time Test Reason Codes and Descriptions
Code
Description
INITIAL
Initial Certification
DIAG
Diagnostic
RECERT
Recertifies tion
Test Description
Element Name: TestDescripticm
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to cycle time tests.
Test Result Code
Element Name; TestResultCode
Report the appropriate code from Table 5 below to indicate the result of tlie test.
Table 5
Cycle Time Test Result Codes and Descriptions
(ode
Description
ABORTED
Test was aborted due to a problem with the monitor.
FAILED
Test was failed.
PASSED
Test was passed.
Begin Date
Element Name: BeginDate
Report the begin date of the first injection in the test.
Begin Hour
Element Name: BeginHour
Report tlie begin hour of the first injection in the test.
Begin Minute
Element Name: BeginMhmte
Report the begin minute of the first injection in the test.
Environmental Protection Agency
Qualify Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions — Page 23
-------
March 11, 2015
2.2.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Cycle Time Test
End Date
Element Name: EndDate
Report the end date of the last injection in the test.
End Hour
Element Name: EndHour
Report the end hour of the last injection in the test.
End Minute
Element Name: EndMinute
Report the end minute of the last injection in the test.
Grace Period Indicator
Element Name: GracePeriodlndicator
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to cycle time tests.
Year
Element Name: Year
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to cycle time tests.
Quarter
Element Name: Quarter
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to cycle time tests.
Test Comment
Element Name: TestComment
Report a comment regarding the test if desired.
Injection Protocol Code
Element Name: InjectionProtocolCode
Report the code to indicate the use of either elemental or oxidized NIST-traceable Hg standards.
See Table 3 for a list of available codes.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 24
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.2.2 Cycle Time Summary Data
March 11, 2015
2.2.2 Cycle Time Summary Data
Figure 7
Cycle Time Summary Data XML Elements
CyeleTirneSummaryData
"TotaFTlme
CycieTimef njection Data
—V
1..®
Cycle Time Summary Data XML Elements
Use the following instructions for completing each element of the Cycle Time Summary Data
record.
Total Time
Element Name: TotalTime
Report the longer of the upscale and downscale cycle times as the total cycle time. If time-
sharing is used, identify the longest component cycle time obtained for the time-shared analyzer.
Add these longest component cycle times together and then add an appropriate amount of time
(as determined by the CEMS manufacturer) to account for all purge cycles at the different probe
locations, to obtain the total cycle time.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 25
-------
March 11, 2015
2.2.3 Cycle Time Injection Data
2.2.3 Cycle Time Injection Data
Figure 8
Cycle Time Injection Data XML Elements
Cycle Time Injection Data Elements
Use the following instructions for completing each element of the Cycle Time Injection Data
record.
Gas Level Code
Element Name: GasLevelCode
Report the gas level code as "HIGH" if this record reports the upscale response of an analyzer
(i.e., from stack emissions to the high-level calibration gas). If this record reports the downscale
response (i.e., from stack emissions to the zero-level calibration gas), report the calibration gas
level as "ZERO."
Calibration Gas Value
Element Name: CalibrationGasValue
Report the certified value of the calibration gas used for the cycle time test.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 26
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.2.3 Cycle Time Injection Data
March 11, 2015
Begin Date
Element Name: BeginDate
Report the date when the test began.
Begin Hour
Element Name: BeginHour
Report the hour when the test began.
Begin Minute
Element Name: BeginMinute
Report the minute when the test began. This is the point at which the calibration gas was
injected after attaining stable stack emissions (i.e., point B in Figure 6a or 6b (as applicable) in
Section 6.4 of Part 75, Appendix A).
End Date
Element Name: EndDate
Report the date on which the test ended.
End Hour
Element Name: EndHour
Report the hour when the test ended.
End Minute
Element Name: EndMinute
Report the minute when the test ended. This is the point at which 95 percent of the step change
between the starting stable stack emissions and the ending stable calibration gas value was
achieved (i.e., point C in Figure 6a or 6b (as applicable) in Section 6.4 of Part 75, Appendix A).
Injection Cycle Time
Element Name: InjectionCycleTime
Report the upscale or downscale cycle time (as appropriate) for this injection.
Begin Monitor Value
Element Name: BeginMonitorValue
Report the stable analyzer response to the stack emissions at the beginning of the cycle time test
(i.e., point A in Figure 6a or 6b (as applicable) in Part 75, Appendix A).
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 27
-------
March 11, 2015
2.2.3 Cycle Time Injection Data
End Monitor Value
Element Name: EndMonitorValue
Report the final, stable analyzer response to the calibration gas (i.e., point D in Figure 6a or 6b
(as applicable) in Part 75, Appendix A).
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 28
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.3 Linearity Check Data
March 11, 2015
2.3 Linearity Check Data (S02, NOx, C02, and 02)
Figure 9
Linearity Checks XML Structure
(Including: Test Summary Data, Linearity Summary Data, and
Linearity Injection Data)
—pTesltHagiipooR |
-ffe55wt«c«ie]
vi-
—f BegMMimm [
—p EndDate |
—pEnflBBaT]
Include one
Linearity Summary
Data record few each
gas level 111, M. L)
of the linearity check
—j*Iojecnon0«t« |
-flfiiettronHow"]
Include one Linearity
Injection Data recwrd
for each gas injection
of Ac gas level tested
M***urt
-------
March 11, 2015
2.3 Linearity Check Data
Summary Data record for each gas level (low, mid, and high), to report the calculated results
for each level. Each Linearity Summary Data record will include three Linearity Injection
Data records, (one for each calibration gas injection performed at the gas level for that
Linearity Summary Data record). The Linearity Injection Data record is used to report
the reference and measured values for each calibration gas injection.
For a completed linearity check, there will generally be nine Linearity Injection Data records
and three corresponding Linearity Summary Data records. However, if a State agency
requires more than the nine EPA-required gas injections for the purposes of their QA program,
you may (optional) report all of the injections using the same test number, although EPA prefers
that you report only the last three injections at each gas level. If more than nine injections are
reported, calculate and report results in the Linearity Summary Data records using only the
last three injections at each gas level. EPA will evaluate only the last three injections at each
level, as indicated by the date and time of the injections. Additional injections will be
disregarded in the Agency's recalculation of the test results.
Specific Considerations
General Requirements for Linearity Checks
• Linearity checks must be performed with the unit in operation.
• Linearity checks are required for the initial certification of all SO2, NOx, CO2, and O2
monitors, except as noted below.
• Linearity checks are reported on a component basis. The test needs only to be reported
once per component (and range), even if that component is shared among multiple
systems. For example, only one linearity check need be reported for a CO2 monitor that
is a component of both a CO2 monitoring system and a NOx-diluent monitoring system.
• Gas injections must be performed such that two gas injections are never performed
successively at the same level (i.e., low, mid, or high) during the test.
• Linearity checks are not required for an SO2 or NOx analyzer scale with a span value of
30 ppm or less. A Test Extension Exemption Data record is not required to claim
this exemption, which applies both to initial certification and on-going quality-assurance.
• Linearity checks for the two ranges of a dual-range analyzer are reported as separate
tests, even if both ranges of the analyzer are identified in the monitoring plan by a single
Component ID.
• If gas monitors are configured such that injection of calibration gases forces all of the
analyzers into the calibration mode, when performing a linearity check on one monitor
this may (e.g., if using tri-blend calibration gases) initiate simultaneous (unscheduled)
linearity checks of the other analyzers. The results of these unscheduled linearity checks
do not have to be reported as long as they meet the linearity error specifications.
However, if the results of these unscheduled tests indicate that a monitoring system is
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 30
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.3 Linearity Check Data
March 11, 2015
out-of-control, the results must be reported and the test considered a failed linearity
check.
Linearity Checks for Year-Round Reporters
• If reporting data on a year-round basis, a linearity check of each gas monitor is required
for routine quality assurance in each QA operating quarter (i.e., a calendar quarter with
>168 unit or stack operating hours).
• Limited linearity check exemptions are allowed for "non-QA operating quarters" with
< 168 unit or stack operating hours. However, at least one linearity check is required
every four calendar quarters, regardless of the number of unit or stack operating hours.
• If a required linearity check is not completed by the end of the quarter in which it is due,
a 168 unit/stack operating hour grace period is allowed to perform the test. A Test
Extension Exemption Data record is not needed to claim the exemption.
• For dual-range analyzers, you may claim limited linearity check exemptions (up to three
consecutive calendar quarters) on a monitor range that is not used at all during the
quarter. You must report Test Extension Exemption Data records to claim these
exemptions.
Linearity Checks for Ozone Season-Only Reporters
• For Subpart H units or stacks that report NOx mass emissions and heat input data only in
the ozone season, a successful linearity check of each component of the primary or
redundant backup CEMS is required prior to each ozone season. The linearities are to be
completed no later than April 30 in the second-quarter and by July 30 in the third-quarter
(see §75.74(c)(3)(ii)).
• The "QA operating quarter" methodology for determining the frequency of linearity
checks does not apply to ozone season-only reporters. For these sources, linearity checks
are required in April and July (see §75.74(c)(3)(ii)).
• The grace period provisions in Section 2.2.4 of Appendix B also do not apply to ozone
season-only reporters. Instead, a 168 unit (or stack) operating hour conditional data
validation period may be used to perform a linearity check that is not completed by the
April 30 or July 30 deadline (see §75.74(c)(2)(ii)(F), (c)(3)(xi), and (c)(3)(xii)). You
must submit a QA Certification Event Data record to document the required
probationary calibration error and conditional data validation period.
Aborted, Abbreviated, or Discontinued Linearity Checks
• Report all completed and aborted linearity checks that affect data validation. However,
for ozone season-only reporters, an aborted or failed pre-ozone season (April) linearity
check need not be reported if a subsequent linearity check is passed prior to the start of
the current ozone season.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 31
-------
March 11, 2015
2.3 Linearity Check Data
• An aborted test must be reported and is to be treated as a failed test whenever the test is
discontinued due to a monitor failure or malfunction. Do not report, or treat as a failed
test, a linearity check that is discontinued because of a failure unrelated to instrument
performance, such as a power outage, unit outage, or calibration gas problem. The data
and results of such tests are simply documented in the test log and kept on-site. Also, do
not report the results of trial gas injections that are part of the process of optimizing the
performance of a monitor, when the injections meet the acceptance criteria in
§75.20(b)(3)(vii)(E). Furthermore, for a monitor that is already "out-of-control" due to a
failed or aborted linearity check, do not report the results of any subsequent gas injection
attempts that do not meet the acceptance criteria in §75.20(b)(3)(vii)(E).
• If you perform a three-injection "abbreviated" linearity check as a diagnostic (refer to the
Part 75 Emissions Monitoring Policy Manual), do not report the results of this test
electronically. Keep the data and test results on-site, in a format suitable for audit and
inspection.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 32
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.3.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Linearity
March 11, 2015
2.3.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Linearity
Use the following instructions for completing each element of the Test Summary Data section
for the linearity check.
Unit ID or Stack Pipe ID
Element Name: UnitID or StackPipelD
Report the Unit ID or Stack Pipe ID that corresponds to the location of the analyzer.
Test Type Code
Element Name: TestTypeCode
Report the test type code as "LINE."
Monitoring System ID
Element Name: MonitoringSystemID
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to linearity checks.
Component ID
Element Name: ComponentID
Report the three-character Component ID assigned to the analyzer.
Span Scale Code
Element Name: SpanScaleCode
Report the range of the component tested as "H" for high or "L" for low. For single-range
analyzers, report the range as "H" unless you are using the default high-range option, in which
case report the range as "L."
Test Number
Element Name: TestNumber
At each monitoring location and for each test type, report a unique test number for each set of
records which comprises a single test. One method of tracking unique test numbers is to use the
Component ID as a prefix to the number. The test number may not be reused at this location for
another linearity check of the same monitoring component.
Test Reason Code
Element Name: TestReasonCode
Report the purpose of the test using the appropriate code from Table 6. If the test is both a
periodic quality assurance test and a recertification test, report that the test is a recertification
test. If the test is both a periodic quality assurance test and a diagnostic test, report that the test is
a periodic quality assurance test. If this is a periodic quality assurance test performed in grace
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 33
-------
March IL 2015
2.3,1 Test Summary Data Elements for Linearity
period, report that the test is a periodic quality assurance test (QA), and report "1" for the Grace
Period Indicator field.
Table 6
Linearity Test Reason Codes and Descriptions
( i i iptiuti
INITIAL
Initial Certification
DIAG
Diagnostic
QA
Periodic Quality Assurance
RECERT
Recertification
Test Description
Element Name: TestDescription
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to linearity checks.
Test Result Code
Element Name: TestResultCode
Report the appropriate code from Table 7 below to indicate the result of the test.
Table 7
Linearity Test Result Codes and Descriptions
Code
Description
ABORTED
Test was aborted due to problems with the installed monitoring system.*
FAILED
Test was failed.
PASSED
Test was passed and the alternate performance specification was not used.
PASSAPS
Test was passed using the alternative performance specification.
* If aborted due to problems with the reference method equipment, do not report the test.
Begin Date
Element Name: BeginDate
Report the date of the first injection in the test.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions — Page 34
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.3.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Linearity
March 11, 2015
Begin Hour
Element Name: BeginHour
Report the hour of the first injection in the test.
Begin Minute
Element Name: BeginMinute
Report the minute of the first injection in the test.
End Date
Element Name: EndDate
Report the date of the last injection in the test.
End Hour
Element Name: EndHour
Report the hour of the last injection in the test.
End Minute
Element Name: EndMinute
Report the minute of the last injection in the test.
Grace Period Indicator
Element Name: GracePeriodlndicator
Report "1" if the test was performed during a grace period, or "0" if the test was performed
during the normally accepted time period or after a grace period expires.
Year
Element Name: Year
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to linearity checks.
Quarter
Element Name: Quarter
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to linearity checks.
Test Comment
Element Name: TestComment
Report a comment regarding the test if desired.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 35
-------
March 11, 2015
2.3.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Linearity
Injection Protocol Code
Element Name: InjectionProtocolCode
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to linearity checks.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 36
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.3,2 Linearity Summary Data
March 11,2015
2.3.2 Linearity Summary Data
Figure 10
Linearity Summary Data XML Elements
Linearity Summary Data Elements
Use die following instructions for completing each element of the Linearity Summary Data
section.
Gas Level Code
Element Name: GasLevelCode
Report one of the calibration gas level codes with the gas injection, as shown in Table 8, For
high-level injections the calibration gas concentration must be 80 to 100 percent of the span, for
mid-level, 50 to 60 percent of span; and for low-level, 20 to 30 percent of span.
Table 8
Linearity Gas Level Codes and Descriptions
Code
DesrTi|ilitm
LOW
Low Level
ME)
Mid Level
HIGH
High Level
Mean Measured Value
Element Name: MeanMeasuredValue
Calculate and report the mean (arithmetic average) of the measured values for the specified
calibration gas level.
Environmental Protection Agency
Qualify Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions — Page 37
-------
March 11, 2015
2.3.2 Linearity Summary Data
Mean Reference Value
Element Name: MeanReferenceValue
Calculate and report the mean (arithmetic average) of the reference values for the specified
calibration gas level.
Percent Error
Element Name: PercentError
For the linearity checks, calculate and report the linearity error (LE) as a percentage of the
reference gas value, using Equation A-4 of Part 75, Appendix A Section 7.1, or if necessary,
report the absolute value of the difference between the average reference and measured values
(|R - A|). The performance specifications for linearity checks are the same for initial certification
and on-going quality assurance (see Part 75, Appendix A, Section 3.2, and Appendix B, section
2.2.3(e)).
Report the LE as a percentage of the reference gas value if the test meets the standard
performance specification, even if the test also meets the alternative performance specification.
Only when the result does not pass the standard specification, but meets the alternative
specification, is |R - A| reported. Report the LE as a percentage of the reference gas value if the
test fails both specifications.
APS Indicator
Element Name: APSIndicator
Report "1" if you are reporting the results as |R - A|. Report a "0" if you are reporting the LE as
a percentage of the reference gas value.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 38
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.3.3 Linearity Inj ection Data
March 11, 2015
2.3.3 Linearity Injection Data
Figure 11
Linearity Injection Data XML Elements
Linearity Injection Data Elements
Use the following instructions for completing each element of the Linearity Injection Data
section.
Injection Date
Element Name: InjectionDate
Report the date on which the gas injection was performed. Because gas injections are sequential
and cannot be simultaneous, the time of each gas injection in the test must be unique. Gas
injections at each level must be performed such that two gas injections are never performed
successively at the same level (low, mid, or high) during in the test.
Injection Hour
Element Name: InjectionHour
Report the hour when the gas injection was completed.
Injection Minute
Element Name: InjectionMinute
Report the minute when the gas injection was completed.
Measured Value
Element Name: MeasuredValue
Report the instrument measurement value in units of ppm for NOx and SO2, percent CO2 for
carbon dioxide, and percent O2 for oxygen. The value should be rounded to the number of
decimal places required for hourly measured data reported in the hourly data (i.e., one decimal
place).
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 39
-------
March 11, 2015
2.3.3 Linearity Inj ection Data
Reference Value
Element Name: Reference Value
Report the certified value of the reference calibration gas for each injection. The reference value
must be in units of ppm for NOx and SO2, percent CO2 for carbon dioxide, and percent O2 for
oxygen..
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 40
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.3.4 Linearity Protocol Gas Data
March 11, 2015
2.3.4 Linearity Protocol Gas Data
Figure 12
Linearity Protocol Gas Data XML Elements
Description of Data
Report a Protocol Gas Data record for each cylinder of gas used during the performance of
a linearity check. A minimum of three records should be reported, one for each gas level
(High, Mid, and Low) of the test.
Specific Considerations
• You must report a Protocol Gas Data record when using standard reference material,
NIST-traceable reference material, gas manufacturer's intermediate standard, research
gas mixture, or SRM-equivalent compressed gas primary reference material in place of
an EPA Protocol gas. Report all data elements in this record except the PGVP Vendor ID
and the Expiration Date of the cylinder.
• You must report a Protocol Gas Data record when using purified air material as the
high-level O2 gas. Do not report the Cylinder ID, PGVP Vendor ID, and the Expiration
Date of the cylinder
• Per 75.21(g)(6), you may use a non-expired EPA Protocol gas acquired from a vendor not
participating in the PGVP as long as the cylinder was acquired prior to 60 days after the
final rule is published in the FR. Report a Protocol Gas Data record for each cylinder
acquired from a vendor not participating in the PGVP program. Report all data elements,
reporting "NONPGVP" as the PGVP Vendor ID.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 41
-------
March IL 2015
2,3,4 Linearity Protocol Gas Data
Linearity Protocol Gas Data Elements
Gas Level Code
Element Name: GasLevelCode
Report a calibration gas level code of HIGH, MID, or LOW to indicate the concentration of
the gas in the cylinder. The definition of a high-level, mid-level, and low-level calibration gas
can be found in the Part 75 performance specifications for linearity checks.
Gas Type Code
Element Name: GasTypeCode
Report one or more of the gas type codes in Table 9 to indicate the type(s) of gas(es) in the
cylinder.
Table 9
PGVP Gas Type Codes and Descriptions
( wlr
D^m'i iprimi
S02
EPA Protocol Certified Gas Component SQ>
NO
EPA Protocol Certified Gas Component MO
N02
EPA Protocol Certified Gas Component N02
NOX
EPA Protocol Certified Gas Component Total Oxides of Nitrogen
N2G
EPA Protocol Certified Gas Component Nitrous Oxide
CQ2
EPA Protocol Certified Gas Component CGj
rvi
EPA Protocol Certified Gas Component CO
02
EPA Protocol Certified Gas Component 02
PPN
EPA Protocol Certified Gas Component Propane
CH4
EPA Protocol Certified Gas Component Methane
HE
EPA Protocol Certified Gas Component Helium
H2S
EPA Protocol Certified Gas Component Hydrogen Sulfide
BALA
Balance Gas is Air
BALN
Balance Gas is Mitogen
APPVI)
Other EPA-approved EPA Protocol gas blend (see note below). Do not report certified
components when using this code.
AIR
Zero Air Material (instrument air with no cylinder and meeting the requirements of paragraphs
(2! or (3) of the ZAN! definition in $ 72,2). This code is reported only when it is used as. a
high-level 02 gas for an oxygen analyzer. Do not report AIR when used to zero an analyzer.
Do not report certified components when using this code.
(coiit.)
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions — Page 42
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.3,4 Linearity Protocol Gas Data
March 11,2015
Table 9
PGVP Gas Type Codes and Descriptions (cunt)
( ink
ijXidii
SRM
Standard reference material. Do not report certified components when using this code.
NTRM
NIST-traceable reference material. Do not report certified components when using this. code.
GMIS
Gas manufacturer's intermediate standard. Do not report certified components when using this
code.
RGM
Research gas mixture. Do not report certified components when using this code
PRM
SRM-equivalent compressed gas primary reference material. Do not report certified
components when using this code.
ZERO
Zero gas (meeting the definition of "Zero Air Material" in §72.2) used for the low level
calibration of a reference analyzer used in RATA testing. Do not report certified components
when using this code.
Note: If yon use a blend of EPA Protocol gases that is not present in this table, you may report a value of
"APPVD", but you will need to contact EPA before submitting the data in order to get permission to use
this code.
Cylinder Identifier
Element Name: Cylinderldentifier
Report the vendor-assigned identification or serial number found on the cylinder.
For purified air material, leave this field blank.
Vendor Identifier
Element Name: Vendorldevtifier
For an EPA Protocol gas. report the EPA-assigned PGVP Vendor ID of the production site that
supplied the cylinder. PGVP Vendor IDs are year .specific, therefore report the assigned PGVP
Vendor ID that is applicable on the dale the cylinder is certified. Report "NONPGVP" if the
cylinder was purchased from a non-participating vendor prior to 60 days after the final rale is
published in the PR. Leave this field blank if the Gas Type Code is ZERO, AIR, SUM, NTRM,
GMIS, RGM, or PRM.
Expiration Date
Element Name: ExpirationDate
For an EPA Protocol gav SRM. NTRM. GMIS. RGM or PRM, report the cylinder's expiration
date. Leave this field blank if the Gas T ype ('ode is AIR or ZERO.
Environmental Protection Agency
Qualify Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions — Page 43
-------
March 11, 2015
2.4 Hg Linearity and System Integrity Check Data
2.4 He. Linearity and 3-Level System Integrity Check Data
Figure 13
Hg Linearity/System Integrity Check XML Elements
Description
Report all Hg linearity checks and 3-level system integrity checks performed for initial
certification, recertification, ongoing quality assurance, or diagnostic purposes using the Test
summary data, Hg Summary Data, and Hg Injection Data records. Submit one Test
summary data record for each test. Include a separate Hg Summary Data record for each
tested gas level (low, mid, high) in order to report the calculated results for that gas level. Each
Hg Summary Data record will include multiple Hg Injection Data records (one for each
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 44
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.4 Hg Linearity and System Integrity Check Data
March 11, 2015
calibration injection performed at the gas level for that Hg Summary Data record). The Hg
Injection Data record is used to report the reference and measured values for each calibration
gas injection.
For completed tests, there will generally be three Hg Summary Data records and nine
corresponding Hg Injection Data records.
Specific Considerations
General Requirements
• For initial certification, a linearity check must be performed. If the Hg monitor has a
converter, a 3-level system integrity check is also required for initial certification. (See
sections 4.1.1.2 and 4.1.1.3 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart UUUUU.)
• For ongoing quality assurance for an Hg monitor that does not have a converter, conduct
quarterly linearity checks as specified in section 5.1.2.2 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part
63, Subpart UUUUU. For an Hg monitor that does have a converter, conduct either
quarterly linearity checks or 3-level system integrity checks.
• Linearity and 3-level system integrity checks are reported on a component basis.
• Linearity and 3-level system integrity checks are required to be performed with the unit
in operation.
Aborted or Discontinued Linearity or 3-Level System Integrity Checks
• Report all completed and aborted linearity or 3-level system integrity checks that affect
data validation.
• An aborted test must be reported and is to be treated as a failed test whenever the test is
discontinued due to a monitor failure or malfunction. Do not report or treat as a failed
test a linearity or 3-level system integrity check which is discontinued because of a
failure which is unrelated to instrument performance, such as a power outage, unit
outage, or calibration gas problem. Such tests that are aborted must simply be
documented in the test log and kept on-site. For a monitor that is already "out-of-control"
due to a failed or aborted linearity check or 3-level system integrity check, it is not
necessary to report the results of subsequent injection attempts that do not meet the
acceptance criteria in Appendix A of Subpart UUUUU.
Reporting Deadlines
• A linearity check or 3-level system integrity check of each Hg monitor is required in each
QA operating quarter (i.e., a calendar quarter with > 168 unit or stack operating hours)
for routine quality assurance.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 45
-------
March 11, 2015
2.4 Hg Linearity and System Integrity Check Data
• Limited linearity check (or 3-level system integrity check) exemptions are allowed for
"non-QA operating quarters" with <168 unit or stack operating hours. However, at least
one linearity check (or 3-level system integrity check) is required every four calendar
quarters, regardless of the number of unit or stack operating hours.
• If a required linearity or 3-level system integrity check is not completed by the end of the
quarter in which it is due, a 168 unit/stack operating hour grace period is allowed to
perform the test.
(See section 5.1.2.2 and Table A-2 in Appendix A to 40 CFRPart 63, Subpart UUUUU).
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 46
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.4.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Hg Linearity and System Integrity
March 11, 2015
2.4.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Hg Linearity and System
Integrity
Instructions for completing each element of the Test Summary Data section for the Hg
linearity or 3-level system integrity check are provided below.
Unit ID or Stack Pipe ID
Element Name: UnitID or StackPipelD
Report the Unit ID or Stack Pipe ID that corresponds to the location of the analyzer.
Test Type Code
Element Name: TestTypeCode
For an Hg linearity check, report the test type code as "HGLINE". For a 3-level system integrity
check, report the test type code as "HGSI3".
Monitoring System ID
Element Name: MonitoringSystemID
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to linearity or 3-level system integrity checks.
Component ID
Element Name: ComponentID
Report the three-character Component ID assigned to the Hg analyzer.
Span Scale Code
Element Name: SpanScaleCode
Report the range of the component tested as "H".
Test Number
Element Name: TestNumber
At each monitoring location and for each test type, report a unique test number for each set of
records which comprise a single test. One method of tracking unique test numbers is to use the
Component ID as a prefix to the number. The test number may not be reused at this location for
another test of the same type.
Test Reason Code
Element Name: TestReasonCode
Report the purpose of the test using the appropriate code from Table 10. If the test is both a
periodic quality assurance test and a recertification test, report that the test is recertification test.
If the test is both a periodic quality assurance test and a diagnostic test, report that the test is a
periodic quality assurance test.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 47
-------
March IL 2015
2.4.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Hg Linearity and System Integrity
Table 10
Hg Linearity or 3-Level System Integrity Check
Reason Codes and Descriptions
Code
Description
INITIAL
Initial Certification
DIAG
Diagnostic
QA
Periodic Qualify Assurance
RECERT
Recertification
Test Description
Element .Xante: TestDescription
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to linearity or 3-level system integrity checks.
Test Result Code
Element Same: TestResultCode
Report the appropriate code from Table 11 below to indicate the result of the test.
Table 11
Hg Linearity or 3-Level System Integrity Check
Result Codes and Descriptions
(ode
Description
ABORTED
Test was aborted due to problems with the installed monitoring
system
FAILED
Test was failed
PASSED
Test was passed and the alternate performance specific was not used
PASSAPS
Test was passed using the alternative performance specification
If the test is aborted due to problems unrelated to the monitor's performance, do not report the
test.
Begin Date
Element Name: BeginDate
Report the date of the first injection in the test.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions — Page 48
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.4.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Hg Linearity and System Integrity
March 11, 2015
Begin Hour
Element Name: BeginHour
Report the hour, on the begin date, of the first injection in the test.
Begin Minute
Element Name: BeginMinute
Report the minute, during the begin hour, of the first injection in the test.
End Date
Element Name: EndDate
Report the date of the last injection in the test.
End Hour
Element Name: EndHour
Report the hour, on the end date, of the last injection in the test.
End Minute
Element Name: EndMinute
Report the minute, during the end hour, of the last injection in the test.
Grace Period Indicator
Element Name: GracePeriodlndicator
Report "1" if the test was performed during a grace period, or "0" if the test was performed either
on-schedule or after the expiration of an allotted grace period.
Year
Element Name: Year
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to linearity or 3-level system integrity checks.
Quarter
Element Name: Quarter
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to linearity or 3-level system integrity checks.
Test Comment
Element Name: TestComment
Report a comment regarding the test, if desired.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 49
-------
March 11, 2015
2.4.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Hg Linearity and System Integrity
Injection Protocol Code
Element Name: InjectionProtocolCode
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to linearity or 3-level system integrity checks.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 50
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.4.2 Hg Summary Data
March 11, 2015
2.4.2 IIg Summary Data
Figure 14
IIg Summary Data XML Elements
HqSummaryOata
GasLeuelCode
sMeaniie«swredWlue'|
M«anReferencft Value
—, PeicentEiiorJ
—j~ APSIndie«tor|l'
—j^HglnjectionData [tjj
1 ,.m
Hg Summary Data Elements
Instructions for completing each element of the Ho Summary Data section are provided below.
Gas Level Code
Element Name: GasLevelCode
Report one of the calibration gas level codes with the gas injection as shown in Table 12. For
high-level injections the calibration gas concentration must be 80 to 100° o of the span value; for
mid-level, 50 to 60% of the span value; and for low-level. 20 to 30° o of the span value.
Table 12
Linearity and 3-Level System Integrity Check
Gas Level Codes and Descriptions
Dt'sfiiplioii
LQW
Low Level
MID
Mid Level
HIGH
High Level
Mean Measured Value
Element Name: MeanMeasuredValue
Calculate and report the mean (arithmetic average) of the measured values for the specified
calibration gas level.
Environmental Protection Agency
Qualify Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions — Page 51
-------
March 11, 2015
2.4.2 Hg Summary Data
Mean Reference Value
Element Name: MeanReferenceValue
Calculate and report the mean (arithmetic average) of the reference values for the specified
calibration gas level.
Percent Error
Element Name: PercentError
Calculate and report the error as a percentage of the reference gas value or, if necessary, as the
absolute value of the difference between the average reference and measured values (|R - A|).
For each type of test, the performance specifications are the same for both initial certification and
on-going quality-assurance (see Tables A-l and A-2 in Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart
UUUUU).
Report the linearity error (LE) or system integrity error (SIE) as a percentage of the reference
value if the test meets the standard performance specification, even if the test also meets the
alternative performance specification. Only when the result does not pass the standard
specification, but does meet the alternative specification, is |R - A| reported. Report the error as
a percentage of the reference gas value if the test fails both specifications.
APS Indicator
Element Name: APSIndicator
Report "1" if you are reporting the results as the absolute value of the difference between the
average reference and measured values. Report "0" if you are reporting the LE or SIE as a
percentage of the reference gas value.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 52
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.4.3 Hg Injection Data
March 11, 2015
2.4.3 Hg Injection Data
Figure 15
Hg Injection Data XML Elements
Hg Injection Data Elements
Instructions for completing each element of the Hg Injection Data section are provided below.
Injection Date
Element Name: InjectionDate
Report the date of the gas injection. Because gas injections are sequential and cannot be
simultaneous, the time of each gas injection must be unique for each analyzer. Gas injections at
each level (L, M, H) must be performed such that two gas injections are never performed
successively at the same level.
Injection Hour
Element Name: InjectionHour
Report the hour of the gas injection.
Injection Minute
Element Name: InjectionMinute
Report the minute of the gas injection.
Measured Value
Element Name: MeasuredValue
Report the measured value in units of ng/scm, rounded to one decimal place.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 53
-------
March 11, 2015
2.4.3 Hg Injection Data
Reference Value
Element Name: Reference Value
Report the certified value of the reference calibration gas for each injection in units of ng/scm,
rounded to one decimal place.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 54
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.5 Relative Accuracy Test Audit (RATA)
March 11, 2015
2.5 Relative Accuracy Test Audit (RATA)
Figure 16a
RATA Test XML Structure
1 TestgumfflayyD&fa
'' " KmrnmJ"*
jwt Test
-c
I
a
Hisiis
.'owwwj
:XJi" ^
£~i
ladwfca RATA "5
Smmmy Omtmm
«'.*• c*h oj*t ¦*»>.•
ho«< Ratoi) k> sMish
<*RA! \KMmy *
f'wj
-5
"S
¦
Iftciwshf s T«t
nk....J...-
I 'Jul
peewit to ®
*>a«andard
rf**S5SST|
-fsacri
i
^ )..TT^jrr ^
i.»
ll f ,IM bit |, '« ,
i!K iu\f\ ojv KA I A KtW
ftgtg •¦ >8-, I 5,»f
Will itl'SiC R \ 1 \ 4i ttK
MVufwM <«lV».*lltur
r., Jtf ;-. t|^,
k*v» muM ot ilk
RATA SummM)' Dak
IWWll
There s'^uM N. >3
fiiiiiiltititti of nine
RATA Run 0«M
lw %\kU
level tesfiud
****??!
4Vl*»MUdrl
•€
1
3
*5
* rr*
ttlAllfcltffclW
RATA Run f>,iii»
(vriVm R.-V?A '<
^feerc M0k%nH«!
2t» «w Me»f»o«l 2 ' '
I» all
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 55
-------
March 11, 2015 2.5 Relative Accuracy Test Audit (RATA)
Figure 16b
Additional RATA XML Elements for Flow RATAs
(Methods 2F and 2G, and Method 2 using Method 2H Wall Effects Measurements)
¦j*P»nc#ntCoI J-
—P Wetilol ecula rWekght fc
fS x
~|° ProbeTypeC ocitt |
" PresaureMeaaureCode
' MethocfT raversePointlD
VelocftyCalibratianCoafllcienT
ww
LastProbe&fttcr
}
* c^L?i• ^i'7e s 5-Tu e |
—jcAvaSquareVeiDiffPres»ure I
—[~Tsia7r^
—1° i1,*1 .•*e' '''''a 11E yfgcts ^°'ntii
'YawAngle
Pitch Angle
C alculated Vel oeity
— ~ R«placementVeIocity •
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 56
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.5 Relative Accuracy Test Audit (RATA)
March 11, 2015
Description of Data
Report all RATAs performed for initial certification, recertification, ongoing quality assurance,
or diagnostic purposes using Test Summary Data, RATA Data, RATA Summary Data, and
RATA Run Data records. Use the RATA Run Data record to report the measured data for
each test run. The RATA Summary Data record is used to report the calculated results and
statistical information for the RATA at the tested operating level. You must include a RATA
Summary Data record for each operating level tested to satisfy the RATA testing requirement.
Use the RATA Data record to report the number of operating levels that make up the RATA
and the overall results of the test (i.e., relative accuracy, bias adjustment factor, and RATA test
frequency). There should be a single RATA Data record for each RATA.
Only one RATA Summary Data record (along with its associated RATA Run Data records) is
reported for a RATA of a gas or moisture monitoring system. Up to three RATA SUMMARY
Data records (along with their associated RATA Run Data records) are reported for a RATA
of a flow monitoring system, depending upon whether the test was performed at one, two, or
three operating levels. There should be a minimum of nine RATA Run Data records reported
for each operating level, unless the RATA was aborted.
In addition to the records listed above, the following records must be reported in certain
circumstances:
• Report Flow RATA Run Data records and RATA Traverse Data records for RATAs
of flow monitoring systems in which:
— Method 2F or 2G is used; or
— Method 2 is used, and a calculated wall effects adjustment factor is determined by
direct measurement using Method 2H.
For Method 2F and 2G RATAs, report a Flow RATA Run Data record for each run
used to calculate relative accuracy (i.e., Run Status Code is equal to "RUNUSED" in
the RATA Run Data record).
For Method 2 RATAs using Method 2H to derive a measured wall effects adjustment
factor, report a Flow RATA Run Data record for the run (or runs) used to calculate
the wall effects adjustment factor.
With each Flow RATA Run Data record, report a RATA Traverse Data record
for each Method 1 traverse point in the run. There should be a minimum of twelve
RATA Traverse Data records reported for each run. However, a minimum of
sixteen records is required for circular stacks using a calculated wall effects
adjustment factor.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 57
-------
March 11, 2015
2.5 Relative Accuracy Test Audit (RATA)
• Report a Test Qualification Data record to claim an exception from the usual testing
requirements. Additional details are provided in the Test Qualification Data record.
There are three types of claims for which this record is appropriate:
1. Single-load Flow RATA claim. For locations that have an installed stack flow
monitor and operate primarily at a single operating level (in accordance with Part 75,
Appendix B Section 2.3.1.3(c)(3)), include this claim with each flow RATA to
indicate the supporting load operation percentages.
2. Exception from Normal Load requirement for pollutant system. For unusual
situations in which a single-level RATA could not be performed at the normal
operating level, include this claim if the RATA was performed at a different operating
level. You must receive specific EPA approval to qualify for this exception.
3. Exception from Normal Load requirement for flow system. For unusual
situations in which a multi-level flow RATA could not be performed when the unit
was operating at normal load ranges, include this claim if the load ranges of the
operating levels tested deviated from the values reported in the Monitoring Load
DATA record for the unit or stack. You must receive specific EPA approval to qualify
for this exception.
Specific Considerations
General Requirements
• RATAs are performed and reported only on a system basis. For example, the RATA for
a NOx-diluent monitoring system must be performed on a lb/mmBtu basis, and not on an
individual component basis.
• Gas monitor RATAs are always single-load tests, performed at the designated normal
load. If two normal loads are defined in the monitoring plan, the test may be done at
either load level.
• Flow RATAs are generally required to be performed at three operating levels (low, mid,
and high) for initial certification and recertification. For ongoing QA tests, the RATAs
are generally done at the two most frequently-used operating levels, although a three-load
test is required at least once every five years (20 calendar quarters), and whenever the
flow monitor polynomial constants or K-factors are changed. Note the following
exceptions:
— For flow monitors installed on peaking units and bypass stacks, only single-load flow
RATAs are required.
— Some units have approved petitions to perform tests at fewer than the standard
number of load levels. If the exemption from the standard requirement is ongoing,
this information should be reported in the Monitor Qualification Data record in
the monitoring plan. If the exemption is test-specific, such as a single-load claim
based on operating for > 85.0 percent of the time at a single load since the previous
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 58
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.5 Relative Accuracy Test Audit (RATA)
March 11, 2015
annual flow RATA, this information should be reported in a Test Qualification
Data record.
• For certain Hg reference methods (i.e., EPA Method 29 and the Ontario Hydro Method),
paired sampling trains are required when performing the RATA (see section 4.1.1.5 of
Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart UUUUU). To validate a RATA run, the relative
deviation (RD) of the Hg concentrations obtained with the paired trains must not exceed
"3
10 percent, when the average Hg concentration is greater than 1.0 |Lxg /m . If the average
"3
Hg concentration is less than or equal to 1.0 |Lxg /m , the RD must not exceed 20 percent.
The RD results are also acceptable if the absolute difference between the Hg
"3
concentrations measured by the paired trains does not exceed 0.2 |ig/m .
Aborted or Discontinued RATAs
• Report the results of all completed and aborted RATAs which affect data validation.
However, for ozone season-only reporters, an aborted or failed pre-ozone season RATA
need not be reported if a subsequent RATA is passed prior to the start of the current
ozone season.
• An aborted RATA is treated as a failed test if the RATA is discontinued due to a monitor
system failure, and the results must be reported. It is not necessary to report, or to treat as
a failed test, a RATA which is discontinued because of a failure which is unrelated to
instrument performance, such as a power outage, unit outage, unit stability problems, or
reference method failure.
• Also do not report the results of trial RATA runs that are part of the process of
optimizing the performance of a Part 75 monitor, when the injections meet the acceptance
criteria in §75.20(b)(3)(vii)(E). For trial runs that do not affect data validation, document
the results as part of the official test log and maintain records on-site (or at an alternative
location known to the regulatory agency, if on-site storage is not feasible).
RATA Deadlines
• For units or stacks reporting data on a year-round basis for routine quality assurance, a
RATA of each primary or redundant backup monitoring system (except for Hg, HC1 and
HF CEMS and Hg sorbent trap monitoring systems) is required either semiannually (i.e.,
once every two QA operating quarters) or annually (i.e., once every four QA operating
quarters), depending on the relative accuracy (RA) percentage obtained in the previous
RATA. For Hg, HC1 and HF CEMS or sorbent trap monitoring systems, the required
RATA frequency is annual (i.e., once every four QA operating quarters), irrespective of
the RA percentage attained in the previous test. However, in all cases, a RATA is
required once every eight calendar quarters, regardless of how many QA operating
quarters have elapsed since the last test.
• For a non-redundant backup monitoring system, a RATA is required only once every
eight quarters, unless it is used at a particular unit or stack location for more than 720
hours in a calendar year (see §75.20(d)). To claim this exemption, report the appropriate
Test Extension Exemption Data record.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 59
-------
March 11, 2015
2.5 Relative Accuracy Test Audit (RATA)
• Part 75 also allows extensions of SO2 RATA deadlines based on the type of fuel
combusted during the quarter and provides conditional RATA exemptions in certain
instances. Use the Test Extension Exemption Data records to report these claims.
(See the Test Extension Exemption Data instructions for details.) If a unit with an
SO2 monitor combusts only very low sulfur fuel (as defined in 40 CFR 72.2) and no other
type(s) of fuel(s), the owner or operator is exempted from performing SO2 RATAs (see
§75.21(a)(6)); no test exemption claim record is necessary in this case.
• For year-round reporters, if a required RATA is not completed by the end of the quarter
in which it is due, a 720 unit/stack operating hour grace period is allowed to perform the
test. A Test Extension Exemption Data record is not needed to claim the exemption.
• For units or stacks reporting data only in the ozone season, a successful RATA of each
primary and redundant backup CEMS is required prior to each ozone season. The RATA
is to be completed no later than April 30 each year in either the first or second calendar
quarter, but no later than April 30 (see §75.74(c)(2)(ii)). Note that the QA operating
quarter method of determining RATA deadlines and data validation status does not apply
to these units or stacks.
• The RATA grace period provisions in Section 2.3.3 of Appendix B also do not apply to
units or stacks reporting data only in the ozone season. However, a 720 unit (or stack)
operating hour conditional data validation period may be used to complete a RATA after
the April 30 deadline (see §75.74(c)(2)(ii)(F), (c)(3)(xi) and (c)(3)(xii)). You must
submit a QA Certification Event Data record to document the required probationary
calibration error and conditional data validation period.
• The single-load flow RATA provision based on operation at a single load level (L, M, or
H) for > 85% of the time since the previous flow RATA does not apply to ozone season-
only reporters.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 60
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.5.1 Test Summary Data Elements for RATA
March 11, 2015
2.5.1 Test Summary Data Elements for RATA
Use the following instructions for completing each element of the Test Summary Data section
for a RATA.
Unit ID or Stack Pipe ID
Element Name: UnitID or StackPipelD
Report the Unit ID or Stack Pipe ID that corresponds to the location of the monitoring system.
Test Type Code
Element Name: TestTypeCode
Report the test type code as "RATA."
Monitoring System ID
Element Name: MonitoringSystemID
Report the three-character Monitoring System ID assigned to the monitoring system.
Component ID
Element Name: ComponentID
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to RATAs.
Span Scale Code
Element Name: SpanScaleCode
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to RATAs.
Test Number
Element Name: TestNumber
Assign and report a test number to each set of relative accuracy runs which comprises a relative
accuracy test. For a multi-level flow RATA, all the low, mid, and high level runs (as applicable)
of the test in the RATA Run Data records and their corresponding RATA summary data
records are part of the same test.
Test Reason Code
Element Name: TestReasonCode
Report the purpose of the test using the appropriate code from Table 13. If the test is both a
periodic quality assurance test and a recertification test, report that the test is a recertification
test. If the test is both a periodic quality assurance test and a diagnostic test, report that the test is
a periodic quality assurance test. If this is a periodic quality assurance test performed in grace
period, report that the test is a periodic quality assurance test (QA), and report" 1" for the Grace
Period Indicator field.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 61
-------
March IL 2015
2,5,1 Test Summary Data Elements for RATA
Table 13
RATA Test Reason Codes and Descriptions
Dcst i jjiiimi
INITIAL
Initial Certification
DIAG
Diagnostic
QA
Periodic Quality Assurance
EECERT
Recertifies tion
Test Description
Element, Name: TestDescriptiori
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to RATAs,
Test Result Code
Element Name: TestResultCode
Report the appropriate code from Table 14 below to indicate the result of the test.
Table 14
RATA Test Result Codes and Descriptions
Code
Description
ABORTED
Test was aborted due to problems with the installed monitoring system,*
FAILED
Test was failed.
PASSED
Test was passed and the alternate performance specification was not used.
PASSAPS
Test was passed using the alternative performance specification.
* If aborted due to problems with the process or the reference method equipment, do not report the test.
Begin Date
Element Name: BeginDate
Report the begin date of the first run in the test.
Begin Hour
Element Name: BeginHour
Report the begin hour of the first run ill the test.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions — Page 62
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.5.1 Test Summary Data Elements for RATA
March 11, 2015
Begin Minute
Element Name: BeginMinute
Report the begin minute of the first run in the test.
End Date
Element Name: EndDate
Report the end date of the last run in the test.
End Hour
Element Name: EndHour
Report the end hour of the last run in the test.
End Minute
Element Name: EndMinute
Report the end minute of the last run in the test.
Grace Period Indicator
Element Name: GracePeriodlndicator
Report "1" if the test was performed during a grace period, and "0" if the test was performed
either on-schedule or after the expiration of an allotted grace period.
Year
Element Name: Year
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to RATAs.
Quarter
Element Name: Quarter
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to RATAs.
Test Comment
Element Name: TestComment
Report any comments regarding the test. Additionally, for tests conducted after January 1, 2009,
EPA encourages use of this field to report the name of the stack testing company, the lead tester,
and whether testing was conducted in accordance with ASTM D7036.
Injection Protocol Code
Element Name: InjectionProtocolCode
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to RATAs.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 63
-------
March 11, 2015
2.5.2 RATA Data
2.5.2 RATA Data
Figure 17
RATA Data XML Elements
"¦--I^RATASummaryData [£|
r r_^
Q..x
RATA Data Elements
Instructions for completing each element of the RATA Data record are provided below.
Number of Load Levels
Element Name: NumberOfLoadLevels
Report the number of operating level tests which are required for a successful RATA. For
RATAs of gas and moisture systems, report "1." For flow RATAs, report "1," "2," or "3," as
appropriate.
Relative Accuracy
Element Name: Relative Accuracy
Report the relative accuracy percentage, calculated according to section 7.3 of Part 75, Appendix
A or (for Hg monitoring systems), according to section 4.1.1.5.2 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part
63, Subpart UUUUU. For HC1 and HF monitoring systems calculate the relative accuracy
percentage, on a ppm basis, according to section 12 of Performance Specification 2 (PS 2) in
appendix B to part 60 (see Equations 2-3 through 2-6 of PS 2). For multi-level flow RATAs,
report the highest relative accuracy percentage at all tested operating levels. Leave this field
blank for a RATA that is aborted prior to completion, due to a problem with the monitoring
system.
RATA Frequency Code
Element Name: RATAFrequencyCode
For year-round reporters, report the frequency code from Table 15 below that identifies when a
RATA performed for initial certification, recertification, or routine QA expires and the next test
is due. For primary and redundant backup monitoring systems (except for Hg, HC1 and HF
CEMS and Hg sorbent trap monitoring systems), the test frequency is based on the relative
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 64
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2,5,2 RATA Data
March 11,2015
accuracy percentage obtained, or, if necessary, on the alternative performance specification. If
the test qualifies for a reduced (i.e., annual) RATA frequency as provided in Part 75, Appendix
B, Section 2.3.1.2, report 4QTR.S. If the RATA passes but does not qualify for annual
frequency, then the standard i -.emminma!) lest frequency applies: in that ca->e. report 2QTRS. If
a single load flow RATA is conducted as the requited semi-annual test, report ALTSL. For non-
redundant backup systems, if the RATA passes, report 8QTRS. For ozone season-only reports,
report OS. For Ilg, HO, and HF CEMS and Hg sorbent trap monitoring systems, report 4QTRS
since the RATA frequency is always annual.
Table 15
RATA Frequency Codes and Descriptions
Code Description
2QTRS
Two QA Operating Quarters
4QTRS
Four QA Operating Quarters
8QTRS
Eight Calendar Quarters (applies to non-redundant backup systems only)
ALTSL
Alternating Single Load RATA for Flow
OS
Ozone Season-Only
Leave this field blank if the RATA failed.
Overall Bias Adjustment Factor
Element Name: Ch'erallBimAdjastiiietirFactor
Report the overall bias adjustment factor (BAF) for the system determined from the RATA data.
For Hie RATA of a moisture, Hg, HQ, HF, C02, or O? monitoring system, the BAF will always
be 1.000.
For a single-level RATA, report the BAF calculated at the tested operating level. For a multi-
level flow RATA, report 1.000 only if the bias test is passed (i.e.. the BAF was calculated as
1.000) at all normal operating levels. (A unit or stack may have one or two operating levels
designated as normal in the Monitoring Load Data record.) If the bias test failed at any
normal operating level, report the higher of the BAFs that were calculated at the two most
frequently used operating levels, as designated in the Monitoring Load Data record. (See
Section 6.5.2.1(d) and Section 7.6.5(c) of Appendix A to Part 75.)
Leave this field blank if the RATA failed.
Environmental Protection Agency
Qualify Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions — Page 65
-------
March 11, 2015
2.5.3 RATA Summary Data
2.5.3 RATA Summary Data
Figure 18
RATA Summary Data XML Elements
RATA Summary Data Elements
Instructions for completing each element of the RATA Summary Data record are provided
below.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 66
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.5 J RATA Summary Data
March 11, 2015
Operating Level Code
Element Name: OperatingLevelCode
Report the appropriate operating level code for the set of rams summarized by this RATA
summary record, as shown in 1 able 16.
Table 16
RATA Operating Level. Codes and Descriptions
Code
Description
L
Low
M
Mid
H
High
N
Normal (for peaking units only)
Average Gross Unit Load (or Average Velocity at Operating Level)
Element Name: AverageGrossUnitLoad
Report the average gross unit load in either megawatts or steam load (consistent with the
Monitoring Load Data record in your monitoring plan) for all runs used in the relative accuracy
calculation for this load level for load-based units. For units that do not produce electrical or
steam load report the average velocity in ft/sec at the tested operating level (see RATA Run
Data record and Gross Unit Load Data record instructions).
Reference Method Code
Element Name: ReferenceMethodCode
Report the primary reference inethod(s) used to determine relative accuracy, using the codes
below.
Gas Monitoring System Reference Methods
• For gas monitoring systems use the following codes shown in Table 17.
Table 17
Reference Method Codes for Gas System RATAs
System Type
Code
( (imiiHinh I seil KYI \ Methoiliii
€02,02
3
or Monitoring ^y^tem RATA L >ing R.M 3
3A
CCK or O, Monitoring System RATA Using RM 3 A
3B
COj or C>2 Monitoring System RATA Using RM 3B
(cont.)
Environmental Protection Agency
Qualify Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions — Page 67
-------
March IL 2015
2.5.3 RATA Summary Data
Table 17
Reference Method Codes for Gas System MAT As (cont.)
Svs
-------
2.5 J RATA Summary Data
March 11, 2015
Table 17
Reference Method Codes for Gas System RATAs (cont.)
MMl'lll I>|M-
Code
( oiiiimmh 1. M'd UA I A Mi-HwhIin)
NOXC. NOXP
(cont.)
7C
NOXC Monitoring System RATA Using KM 7C
7D
NOXC Monitoring System RATA Using KM 7D
7E
NOXC Monitoring System RATA Using RM 7E
S02
6
S02 Monitoring System RATA Using RM 6
6A
SC>2 Monitoring System RATA Using RM 6A
6C
SOj Monitoring System RATA Using RM 6C
* Methods 6C. 7E, and 3 A are instrumental test methods, and are the methods of choice for Part 75 RATAs.
Other wet chemistry reference methods (i.e.. Methods 3, 3B. 6, 6A. 7, 7C, and 7D) are allowed under §75.22.
However, wet chemistry methods are seldom, if ever, used, for practical reasons. Note also that Method 20 is
no longer available for Part 75 applications.
• For flow RATAs use the following codes shown in Table 18 (no other codes are
acceptable):
Table 18
Reference Method Codes for Flow RATAs
Code
Commonly I sed RATA Method(s)
2
Method 2, without Wall Effects Adjustment
M2H
Method 2, with Measured Method 2H Wall Effects Adjustment
D2H
Method 2. with Default Method 2B Wall Effects Adjustment
2F
Method 2F, without Wall Effects Adjustment
2G
Method 2G, without Wall Effects Adjustment
2FH
Method 2F, with Method 2H Wall Effects Adjustment (either measured or default)
2GH
Method 2G„ with Method 2H Wall Effects Adjustment (either measured or default)
21
Method 2, with Wall Effects Adjustment Factor (WAF) (either measured or default)
from Conditional Test Method CTM-04I
2FI
Method 2F, with WAF (either measured or default) from Conditional Test Method
CTM-041
2GJ
Method 2G. with WAF (either measured or default) from Conditional Test Method
CTM-041
Environmental Protection Agency
Qualify Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions — Page 69
-------
March 11, 2015
2.5.3 RATA Summary Data
Mean CEM Value
Element Name: MeanCEMValue
Report the arithmetic mean of CEMS values for the operating level.
Mean RATA Reference Value
Element Name: MeanRA TAReference Value
Report the arithmetic mean of reference method values for the operating level.
Mean Difference
Element Name: MeanDifference
Report the arithmetic mean of the difference data for the operating level.
Standard Deviation Difference
Element Name: StandardDeviationDifference
Report the standard deviation of difference data for the operating level.
Confidence Coefficient
Element Name: ConfidenceCoefficient
Report the confidence coefficient value for the operating level.
T Value
Element Name: TValue
Report the tabulated T-value for the operating level.
Alternative Performance Specification (APS) Indicator
Element Name: APSIndicator
Report "0" when the result for the operating level was based on relative accuracy as a percentage
of the mean of the reference method (RM) value. Use this standard performance specification if
it produces a passing result, or if both the standard and alternative specifications are failed.
Report a " 1" when the result was determined by taking the absolute value of the difference
between the RM and CEM mean values. Use this APS only if the standard performance
specification is not met and the APS is met.
Relative Accuracy
Element Name: Relative Accuracy
Report the relative accuracy percentage, calculated according to section 7.3 of Part 75, Appendix
A or (for Hg monitoring systems) according to section 4.1.1.5.2 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part
63, Subpart UUUUU. For HC1 and HF monitoring systems calculate the relative accuracy
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 70
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.5.3 RATA Summary Data
March 11, 2015
percentage according to Equations 2-3 through 2-6 in section 12 of Performance Specification 2
in Appendix B to 40 CFR Part 60.
Bias Adjustment Factor
Element Name: BiasAdjustmentFactor
Report the bias adjustment factor (BAF) at each operating level tested for each passing RATA,
as described below:
• For RATAs of CO2, O2, Hg, HC1, HF, or H2O monitoring systems, always report a BAF
of 1.000, since a bias test is not required for these systems.
• For RATAs of SO2, NOx, and flow monitoring systems, report 1.000 in this field if the
bias test at this level passed and report the calculated BAF if the bias test at this level
failed.
• For a unit that qualifies as a low emitter of SO2 or NOx (see Appendix B to Part 75,
Section 2.3.1.2, paragraphs (e) and (f)), if the calculated BAF exceeds 1.111, either the
calculated BAF or a default value of 1.111 may be reported as the bias adjustment factor,
or report the BAF that will actually be applied to the SO2 or NOx emissions data. That is,
report either the calculated BAF or a default BAF of 1.111, whichever will be used in the
emission calculations (see Section 7.6.5 of Appendix A to Part 75).
Leave this field blank if the operating level did not meet the relative accuracy performance
specification.
CO2 or O2 Reference Method Code
Element Name: C020r02ReferenceMethodCode
For flow RATAs with reference method codes 2F, 2FH, 2FJ, 2G, 2GH, 2GJ, and M2H, report
the reference method ("3" or "3 A") that was used to measure the diluent gas concentrations of
CO2 and O2 in the stack gas.
Leave this field blank for all other RATAs that do not use the above listed reference methods.
Stack Diameter
Element Name: StackDiameter
For flow RATAs with reference method codes 2F, 2FH, 2FJ, 2G, 2GH, 2GJ, and M2H, report
the stack diameter in feet at the test port location. For rectangular stacks or ducts, report the
equivalent diameter, calculated as follows: determine the actual cross-sectional area of the
2 2
rectangular duct, in ft ; set this area equal to the area of a circle, (1/4 % d ); and solve for "d," the
equivalent circular diameter (ft).
Leave this field blank for all other RATAs that do not use the above listed reference methods.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 71
-------
March 11, 2015
2.5.3 RATA Summary Data
Stack Area
Element Name: StackArea
For flow RATAs with reference method codes 2F, 2FH, 2FJ, 2G, 2GH, 2GJ, and M2H, report
the cross-sectional area of the stack or duct in square feet at the test port location. For a
rectangular stack or duct, report the actual cross-sectional area. Do not adjust the area for wall
effects.
Leave this field blank for all other RATAs that do not use the above listed reference methods.
Number of Traverse Points
Element Name: NumberOJTmversePoints
For flow RATAs with reference method code 2J, report the number of Method 1 traverse points
used for the test run. The number of Method 1 traverse points reported in this field must equal
the value reported in the Rectangular Duct WAF Data record in the Monitoring Plan.
For other reference methods, leave this field blank.
Calculated (or Rectangular Duct) WAF
Element Name: CalculatedWAF
For flow RATAs at circular stacks or ducts, where reference method code 2FH, 2GH, or M2H is
used and wall effects measurements are made, report the value of the calculated wall effects
adjustment factor (WAF) applied to the runs of this RATA. The term "WAF" is defined in
Sections 12.2, 12.7.1, and 12.7.2 of Method 2H as "the wall effects adjustment factor that is
applied to the average velocity, unadjusted for wall effects, in order to obtain the final wall
effects-adjusted stack gas velocity..." The value of the WAF that is used to adjust the stack gas
velocity may either be based on a single run or may be the arithmetic average of multiple WAF
determinations.
Note the following instances in which the calculated WAF must be adjusted upward before using
it:
• If a calculated WAF is less than 0.9800 and was derived from a partial wall effects
traverse (according to Section 8.2.2 of Method 2H), adjust the WAF value upward to
0.9800; and
• If a calculated WAF is less than 0.9700 and was derived from a complete wall effects
traverse (according to Section 8.2.3 of Method 2H), adjust the WAF value upward to
0.9700.
For flow RATAs at circular stacks or ducts where reference method code 2FH or 2GH is used,
leave this field blank if a default WAF is being applied to the runs of this RATA.
For flow RATAs at rectangular stacks or ducts, where reference method code 2FJ, 2GJ, or 2J is
used, report to four decimal places the WAF (either measured or default) that is being applied to
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 72
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.5.3 RATA Summary Data
March 11, 2015
all runs of this RATA. The WAF reported in this field must equal the WAF reported in the
Rectangular Duct WAF Data record in the Monitoring Plan.
For all other flow reference methods codes (i.e., 2, 2F, 2G, D2H) and all other non-flow
reference methods, leave this field blank.
Default WAF
Element Name: DefaultWAF
If a default WAF is applied to this test run and to all of the other runs of this RATA and flow
RATA reference method code 2FH, 2GH, or D2H is used, report the appropriate WAF value
from Method 2H. Report a default WAF of 0.9900 for brick and mortar stacks and 0.9950 for all
other stacks.
For flow RATAs with reference method codes 2FH and 2GH, leave this field blank if a
calculated WAF was applied to the runs of this RATA.
For all other flow reference method codes (i.e., 2, M2H, 2F, 2G, 2J, 2FJ, 2GJ) and all other non-
flow reference methods, leave this field blank.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 73
-------
March 11, 2015
2.5.4 RATA Run Data
2.5.4 RATA Run Data
Figure 19
RATA Run Data XML Elements
¦---^FIowRATARunData |TJ
RATA Run Data Elements
Instructions for completing each element of the RATA Run Data record are provided below.
Run Number
Element Name: RunNumber
Assign and report a run number to each measurement, beginning with the number " 1" for each
operating level. Because all runs must be reported whether or not they are used to calculate the
relative accuracy test, run numbers must be consecutive and in chronological order. Do not skip
a run number.
Begin Date
Element Name: BeginDate
Report the date on which the run began.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 74
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.5.4 RATA Run Data
March 11, 2015
Begin Hour
Element Name: BeginHour
Report the hour, on the run begin date, in which the run began. Run times must not overlap.
Begin Minute
Element Name: BeginMinute
Report the minute, during the run begin hour, in which the run began. Run times must not
overlap.
End Date
Element Name: EndDate
Report the date on which the run ended.
End Hour
Element Name: EndHour
Report the hour, on the run end date, in which the run ended. Run times must not overlap.
End Minute
Element Name: EndMinute
Report the minute, during the run end hour, in which the run ended. Run times must not overlap.
CEM Value
Element Name: CEAdValue
Report the measured value from the monitoring system being tested in the appropriate units for
the run. Report these values to the same precision as is required for hourly data (i.e., to the
nearest 0.1 ppm; 0.1|ig/scm; 0.1% CO2, O2, or H2O; 0.001 lb/mmBtu; or 1000 scfh, as
applicable). For flow monitors installed on rectangular stacks or ducts, if using Conditional Test
Method CTM-041 to apply a correction for wall effects, the reference method and flow monitor
run values reported in RATA Run Data will be wall effects-adjusted flow rates.
RATA Reference Value
Element Name: RATAReferenceValue
Report the measured value from the reference method against which the monitoring system is
being compared. This value should reflect adjustment, as necessary, for moisture and/or
calibration bias. Also report these values to the same precision as required for hourly data. For
flow monitors installed on rectangular stacks or ducts, if using Conditional Test Method CTM-
041 to apply a correction for wall effects, the reference method values reported in RATA Run
Data will be the wall effects-adjusted flow rates.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 75
-------
March IL 2015
2,5.4 RATA Run Data
Gross Unit Load or Average Velocity at Operating Level
Element Name: Gross I'nitLoad
Report the load level in megawatts or steam load during each RATA run for load-based units.
The units for this value should be consistent with the units used to define load levels in the
Monitoring Load Data record of the monitoring plan.
For units that do not produce electrical or steam load (e.g., cement kilns, refinery process heaters,
etc.), report the aveiage stack gns velocity at the operating level being tested. To determine the
appropriate average velocity, first divide the range of operation (winch is defined in the
Monitoring Load Data record in terms of stack gas velocity) into low. mid. and high
operating levels, as described in Section 6.5.2.1 (b) of Appendix A. Then, report the velocity at
the midpoint of the tested level for each of the RATA runs (e.g., if the RATA is done at the
"high" operating level and the lugli level extends from 40 to 60 ft/sec, report 50 ft/sec as the
average velocity for each RAT A run).
Run Status Code
Element Name: RunStatusCode
Report whether the run data were used to determine relative accuracy using one of the codes as
shown in Table 19.
Table 19
RATA Run Status Codes and Descriptions
(ode
Description
NOTUSED
Run Not Used in RAT A Calculation
RUNUSED
Run Used in RATA Calculation
At each operating level, a valid RATA must have a minimum of nine runs with a run status of
"RUNUSHD" and a maximum of three runs with a run status of "NOTUSED."
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions — Page 76
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.5.5 Flow RATA Run Data
March 11, 2015
2.5.5 Flow RATA Run Data
Figure 20
Flow RATA Run Data XML Elements
L" 1* AT rave rs e Data |+|
0..B
Flow RATA Run Data Elements
Instructions for completing each element of the Flow RATA Run Data record are provided
below.
Number of Traverse Points
Element Name: NumberOJTmversePoints
Report the number of Method 1 traverse points used for the test run.
Barometric Pressure
Element Name: BarometricPressure
Report the barometric pressure, in inches of mercury, for the test run.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 77
-------
March 11, 2015
2.5.5 Flow RATA Run Data
Stack Static Pressure
Element Name: StaticStackPressure
Report Pg, stack static pressure, in inches of water, for the run. If Pg is negative, include the
minus sign.
Percent CO2
Element Name: PercentC02
Report the dry basis percent CO2 in the stack gas for the test run.
Percent O2
Element Name: PercentO2
Report the dry basis percent O2 in the stack gas for the test run.
Percent Moisture
Element Name: PercentMoisture
Report the stack gas moisture percentage for the test run.
Dry Molecular Weight
Element Name: DryMolecularWeight
Report Md, molecular weight of the stack gas for the test run, on a dry basis. Use Equation 3-1
in Method 3 to calculate Md.
Wet Molecular Weight
Element Name: WetMolecularWeight
Report Ms molecular weight of the stack gas for the test run, on a wet basis. Use Equation 2-6 in
Method 2 to calculate Ms.
Average Velocity without Wall Effects
Element Name: AvgVelocityWithoutWallEffects
Report the average velocity for the test run in feet per second, without considering wall effects.
The calculated average run velocity is the arithmetic average of the calculated point velocities at
the Method 1 traverse points (i.e., the average of all of the velocity values reported for the
Calculated Velocity data element in the RATA Traverse Data record for this test run).
Average Velocity with Wall Effects
Element Name: Average Velocity With WallEffects
For a circular stack using reference method codes 2FH, 2GH, or M2H, report the average run
velocity, considering wall effects if a WAF is derived using the data from this test run. Calculate
this value using the appropriate point velocity values from the RATA Traverse Data record's
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 78
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.5.5 Flow RATA Run Data
March 11, 2015
Calculated Velocity and Replacement Velocity data elements, in Equation 2H-17 of Method 2H.
Report this value even if you decide to apply a default WAF to all the runs of this RATA.
Leave this field blank for reference methods 2F, 2FJ, 2G, and 2GJ or if no WAF was calculated
from the data for this run.
Calculated Wall Effects Adjustment Factor (WAF)
Element Name: CalculatedWAF
For circular stacks using reference method codes 2FH, 2GH, or M2H, report the WAF if a WAF
is calculated using the data from this test run. Derive this value by dividing the adjusted velocity
value of the Average Velocity With Wall Effects by the unadjusted velocity value of the Avg
Velocity Without Wall Effects in accordance with Equation 2H-19 of Method 2H. Report this
value even if you decided to apply a default WAF to all the runs of this RATA.
Leave this field blank for reference methods 2F, 2FJ, 2G, and 2GJ or if no WAF was calculated
from the data for this run.
Average Stack Flow Rate
Element Name: AverageStackFlowRate
Report the average stack gas flow rate for the test run, in scfh (wet basis). If wall effects are not
considered, calculate the average flow rate according to the applicable equation in Method 2, 2F,
or 2G, using the unadjusted average run velocity from the Avg Velocity Without Wall Effects
data element of this record in the calculations. If the stack is circular and wall effects
adjustments are applied, however, first obtain the wall effects-adjusted average velocity by
multiplying the calculated WAF or the default WAF (as appropriate) by the unadjusted average
velocity in accordance with Equation 2H-21 of Method 2H. Then, following the provisions of
Section 12.7 in Method 2H, use the final wall effects-adjusted velocity, obtained from Equation
2H-21, in the applicable equation from Method 2, 2F, or 2G to calculate the wall effects-adjusted
stack gas flow rate. Report this adjusted flow rate as the Average Stack Flow Rate data element.
The flow rate value reported for this data element must equal the flow rate reported as the RATA
Reference Value for this run in the RATA Run Data record.
For a rectangular stack or duct, if Conditional Test Method CTM-041 is used to determine a
WAF, calculate the average stack gas flow rate (in scfh), adjusted for wall effects, using the
following equation:
Qavg = 3600 (As) (vavg) (WAF) (Tstd / Ts) (Ps / Pstd)
Where:
Qavg = Average stack gas flow rate for the run, adjusted for wall effects, wet basis (scfh)
As = Stack or duct cross-sectional area at the test location (ft2)
Vavg = Average stack gas velocity for the run, not accounting for wall effects (ft/sec)
WAF = Wall effects adjustment factor (from the Rectangular Duct WAF Data record in
the monitoring plan)
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 79
-------
March 11, 2015
2.5.5 Flow RATA Run Data
Ts = Average stack temperature (NR)
Tstd = Standard temperature (528 NR)
Ps = Stack pressure, i.e., sum of barometric and static pressures (in. Hg)
Pstd = Standard pressure (29.92 in. Hg)
3600 = Conversion factor (sec/hr)
Note: The Equation above is essentially the same as Equation 25b in CTM-041, except that the
flow rate is expressed in scfh, rather than scf/sec.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 80
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.5.6 RATA Traverse Data
March 11, 2015
2.5.6 RATA Traverse Data
Figure 21
RATA Traverse Data XML Elements
RATA Traverse Data Elements
Use the following instructions for completing each element of the RATA Traverse Data
record.
Probe ID
Element Name: ProbelD
Report the permanent identification number engraved (or otherwise marked) on the probe being
used to measure velocity at the traverse point.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 81
-------
March IL 2015
2,5,6 RATA Traverse Data
Probe Type Code
Element Name: ProbeTypeCode
Report the probe type code for the probe employed in reference method as shown in Table 20.
Table 20
Reference Method Probe Type Codes and Descriptions
Code
Description
TYPE-5A
Type S (automated)
PRISM
Prism-shaped 3-D pitot (without thermocouple)
PRISM-T
Prism-shaped 3-D pilot (with thermocouple)
PRANDT1
Prandtl
TYPE-SM
Type S (manual)
SPHERE
Spherical 3-D Probe
Pressure Measure Code
Element Name: PressureMeasureCode
Report the pressure measurement code in Table 21 based on the device employed in the
reference method.
Table 21
Pressure Measure Codes and Descriptions
Code
Description
ELEC
Electronic Manometer or Electronic Pressure Transducer
MECH
Mechanical Pressure Gauge (e.g., Magiielieiie® gauge)
FLUID
Fluid Manometer
Method Traverse Point ID
Element Name: MethodTraversePomtID
Assign a unique alphanumeric designation to each of the Method 1 traverse points. Maintain the
same point numbering scheme throughout the RATA. Use leading zeros to fill in as necessary.
For example, if the traverse points are numbered consecutively from one through sixteen, report
them as "001," "002," "003," etc.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions — Page 82
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.5.6 RATA Traverse Data
March 11, 2015
Velocity Calibration Coefficient
Element Name: VelocityCalibrationCoefficient
Report the value of the probe or pitot tube velocity calibration coefficient. For a Type-S or
Prandtl pitot tube, this will be Cp. For a three-dimensional probe, this will be the appropriate F2
coefficient.
Last Probe Date
Element Name: LastProbeDate
Report the year, month, and day of the latest successful wind tunnel calibration of the probe or
pitot tube.
Avg Vel Diff Pressure
Element Name: AvgVelDiffPressure
Report the sight-weighted or integrated average velocity differential pressure, in inches of H20,
recorded at the Method 1 traverse point, unless the data acquisition system provides a continuous
readout of the square root of the differential pressure, in which case, leave this field blank. For
Method 2 or 2G, report the average AP value. For a three-dimensional probe, report the average
value of (Pi - P2).
Leave this field blank if you are reporting the integrated average of the square roots of the
velocity differential pressures.
Avg Square Vel Diff Pressures
Element Name: AvgSquare VelDiffPressure
Report the integrated average of the square roots if the data acquisition system electronically
provides an integrated average of the square roots of all differential pressure readings recorded at
the Method 1 traverse point (rather than providing an average of the differential pressure values
themselves).
Leave this field blank if you are reporting the integrated average velocity differential pressure.
T Stack Temperature
Element Name: TStackTemperature
Report the stack temperature measured at the traverse point, in degrees Fahrenheit.
Point Used Indicator
Element Name: PointUsedlndicator
For a circular stack, if this test run was used to calculate a WAF (reference method codes 2FH,
2GH, and M2H only), report "1" in this field if the traverse point is one of the four Method 1
points closest to the stack wall.
Otherwise, leave this field blank.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 83
-------
March 11, 2015
2.5.6 RATA Traverse Data
Number of Wall Effects Points
Element Name: NumberWallEffectsPoints
For a circular stack, if a " 1" is reported for the Point Used Indicator, report the number of wall
effects points used to generate the replacement velocity at the traverse point. The total number
of wall effects points reported for this data element should include: (1) all one-inch incremented
points at which actual wall effects measurements were made; (2) all one-inch incremented points
at which actual wall effects measurements were not made, but for which the velocity obtained at
a subsequent wall effects traverse point was used, as provided under Section 8.7.1.2 of Method
2H; and (3) the traverse point located at drem (as defined in Section 3.3 of Method 2H), if a
velocity measurement was taken at that point.
Otherwise, leave this field blank.
Yaw Angle
Element Name: Yaw Angle
Report the measured yaw angle at the traverse point if Method 2F or 2G is used for the velocity
traverse. If the yaw angle is negative, be sure to include the minus sign.
For reference method code M2H, leave this field blank.
Pitch Angle
Element Name: PitchAngle
Report the measured pitch angle of the traverse point if Method 2F is used for the velocity
traverse. If the pitch angle is negative, be sure to include the minus sign.
For reference method codes 2G, 2GH, 2GJ, and M2H, leave this field blank.
Calculated Velocity
Element Name: CalculatedVelocity
Using the appropriate equation from Method 2, 2F, or 2G (as applicable), calculate the velocity
at the traverse point, in actual ft/sec. Use the Avg Vel Diff Pressure data element at the traverse
point from this record or the Average Square Differential Pressure data element of this record
(whichever is appropriate) in the calculations, along with the T Stack Temperature data element
of this record and the supporting run-level information. Round off the result to two decimal
places. Do not adjust the calculated point velocity for wall effects.
Replacement Velocity
Element Name: ReplacementVelocity
If a " 1" is reported for the Point Used Indicator, report the replacement velocity for the traverse
point. Calculate this value in actual ft/sec, corrected for wall effects in accordance with Equation
2H-15 of Method 2H (see also Form 2H-1 or Form 2H-2 and accompanying instructions in
Method 2H). Otherwise, leave this field blank.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 84
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.5.7 RATA Test Qualification Data
March 11, 2015
2.5.7 RATA Test Qualification Data
Figure 22
RATA Test Qualification Data XML Elements
TestQuaJificatlo-nDsta
IKEEe*-
"TestClaimCode
' BegiriDa:e
'End Bate
' High Load Percentage
'Midi oad Percentage
' L o L o a cl Perce n: a g e
Description of Data
Report a test qualification data record as part of a RATA test to claim an exception from the
usual RATA testing requirements. There are three types of claims for which this record is
appropriate:
1. For a location that has an installed stack flow monitor and is not exempt from performing
multi-load flow RATAs, the required annual flow RATA may be performed at a single
load (i.e., the designated normal load) if certain conditions are met. If the unit or stack
has operated primarily at a single load for > 85.0 percent of the time since the last annual
flow RATA, and if fewer than 20 calendar quarters have elapsed since the last 3-load
flow RATA, a single load RATA claim may be submitted. Include this claim along with
the results of the single-load flow RATA, to document that the 85.0 percent criterion was
met (see Part 75, Appendix B, Section 2.3.1.3(c)(3)). Note that this single-load flow
RATA claim is not available to sources that report emissions data on an ozone season-
only basis.
2. For unusual situations in which a single-level RATA cannot be performed at the normal
operating load level (e.g., due to mechanical problems with the unit, include this claim if
the RATA is performed at a different operating level. You must receive permission from
EPA to claim this exception.
3. For unusual situations in which a multi-level flow RATA cannot be performed at one or
more of the required load levels (e.g., if the unit cannot attain the high-load level, due to
mechanical problems), include this claim record to indicate that tested load levels are not
consistent with the operating range defined in the Monitoring Load Data record. You
must receive permission from EPA to claim this exception. If you obtain permission to
claim the exception, divide the available operating range into low, mid and high segments
according to Part 75, Appendix A, Section 6.5.2.1, and express the operating level for
each RATA (L, M, or H) in terms of the available range.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 85
-------
March IL 2015
2,5.7 RATA Test Qualification Data
RA TA Test Qualification Data Elements
Use the following instructions for completing the Test Qualification Data record.
Test Claim Code
Element Name: TestClaimCode
Report the appropriate test claim code from Table 22 below.
Table 22
RATA Test Claim Codes and Descriptions
Code
Description
SLC
Single-Level Claim for Flow RATA
MLE
Normal Level Exemption for Single-Level RATA
ORE
Operating Range Exemption for Multi-Level Flow RATA
Begin Date
Element Name: Begin Dote
For test claim code SI C. report the date on which the data collection period began for the flow
system. This can be either the date of completion of the last annual flow RATA or the first day
of the calendar quarter in which the last annual flow RATA was performed. (For multi-level
RATAs. the test completion date is the date on which testing of the last operating level was
completed.)
For other claims, leave this field blank.
End Date
Element Name: EndDate
For test claim code SLC. report the date on which the historical load data collection period
ended. This data must be no more than 21 days prior to the date of commencement of the current
annual flow RATA (identified by the Test Number in this record). Alternatively, if you began
that data collection period on the first day of the quarter of the last annual flow RATA, you may
use the last day of the calendar quarter immediately preceding the quarter of this RATA.
For other claims, leave this field blank.
High Load Percentage
Element Name: HighLoadPercentage
For test claim code SLC. report the percentage of the time that the unit (or stack) operated at the
high load (or operating) level (> 60.0 percent of the range of operation defined in the
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions — Page 86
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.5.7 RATA Test Qualification Data
March 11, 2015
Monitoring Load Data record) in the historical data collection period. See Part 75, Appendix
A, Section 6.5.2.1(b).
For other claims, leave this field blank.
Mid Load Percentage
Element Name: MidLoadPercentage
For test claim code SLC, report the percentage of the time that the unit (or stack) operated at the
mid load (or operating) level (> 30.0 percent and < 60.0 percent of the range of operation) in the
historical data collection period.
For other claims, leave this field blank.
Low Load Percentage
Element Name: LowLoadPercentage
For test claim code SLC, report the percentage of the time that the unit (or stack) operated at the
low load (or operating) level (0 to 30.0 percent (inclusive) of the range of operation) in the
historical data collection period.
For other claims, leave this field blank.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 87
-------
March 11, 2015
2.5.8 RATA Protocol Gas Data
2.5.8 RATA Protocol Gas Data
Figure 23
RATA Protocol Gas Data XML Elements
Description of Data
Report a Protocol Gas Data record for each cylinder of gas used during the performance of a
a RATA conducted using one of the instrumental reference methods (6C, 7E, or 3 A). For RATA
tests conducted using Method 6C, 7E, or 3 A report one record for each cylinder used to
determine analyzer calibration error, drift, and system bias. A minimum of three records should
be reported, one for each gas level (High, Mid, and Low).
Specific Considerations
• You must report a Protocol Gas Data record when using standard reference material,
NIST-traceable reference material, gas manufacturer's intermediate standard, research
gas mixture, or SRM-equivalent compressed gas primary reference material in place of
an EPA Protocol gas. Report all data elements in this record except the PGVP Vendor ID
and the Expiration Date of the cylinder.
• You must report a Protocol Gas Data record when using purified air material as the
high-level O2 gas. Do not report the Cylinder ID, PGVP Vendor ID, and the Expiration
Date of the cylinder.
• For tests conducted using EPA Reference Method 3 A, 6C, or 7E, report Gas Type Code
"ZERO" if a zero gas is used as the low level calibration gas of the reference analyzer. Do
not report the Cylinder ID, PGVP Vendor ID, and the Expiration Date of the cylinder.
• Per 75.21(g)(6), you may use a non-expired EPA Protocol gas acquired from a vendor not
participating in the PGVP as long as the cylinder was acquired prior to 60 days after the
final rule is published in the FR. Report a Protocol Gas Data record for each cylinder
acquired from a vendor not participating in the PGVP program. Report all data elements,
reporting "NONPGVP" as the PGVP Vendor ID.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 88
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.5.8 RATA Protocol Gas Data
March 11, 2015
• When conducting a RATA of a NOX-diluent monitoring system, report a a PROTOCOL
Gas Data record for each cylinder used to determine analyzer calibration error, drift, and
system bias for both the NOX and the diluent components of the system. If you use
separate cylinders for the NOX and the diluent gas, you should report at least six records,
one for each gas level (High, Mid, and Low) of each gas. If you use cylinders that
contain a blend of the NOX and the diluent gas, you should report at least three records,
one for each gas level (High, Mid, and Low) of the blend.
RATA Protocol Gas Data Elements
Gas Level Code
Element Name: GasLevelCode
Report a calibration gas level code of HIGH, MID, or LOW to indicate the concentration of the
gas in the cylinder. The definition of a high-level, mid-level, and low-level calibration gas can
be found in the Part 75 performance specifications for linearity checks and in EPA Reference
Method 7E for RATAs.
Gas Type Code
Element Name: GasTypeCode
Report one or more of the gas type codes in Table 9 of Section 2.3.4 to indicate the type(s) of
gas(es) in the cylinder.
Note: If you use a blend of EPA Protocol gases that is not present in this table, you may report a
value of "APPVD", but you will need to contact EPA before submitting the data in order to get
permission to use this code.
Cylinder Identifier
Element Name: Cylinderldentifier
Report the vendor-assigned identification or serial number found on the cylinder. For purified
air material, leave this field blank.
Vendor Identifier
Element Name: Vendor Identifier
For an EPA Protocol gas, report the EPA-assigned PGVP Vendor ID of the production site that
supplied the cylinder. PGVP Vendor IDs are year specific, therefore report the assigned PGVP
Vendor ID that is applicable on the date the cylinder is certified. An up-to-date list of PGVP
Vendor IDs will be located on the EPA website, and can be accessed via the ECMPS Support
website. Report "NONPGVP" if the cylinder was purchased from a non-participating vendor
prior to 60 days after the final rule is published in the FR. Leave this field blank if the Gas Type
Code is ZERO, AIR, SRM, NTRM, GMIS, RGM, or PRM.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 89
-------
March 11, 2015
2.5.8 RATA Protocol Gas Data
Expiration Date
Element Name: ExpirationDate
For an EPA Protocol gas, SRM, NTRM, GMIS, RGM, or PRM, report the cylinder's expiration
date. Leave this field blank if the Gas Type Code is AIR or ZERO.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 90
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.5.9 RATA Air Emission Testing Data
March 11, 2015
2.5.9 RATA Air Emission Testing Data
Figure 24
RATA Air Emission Testing Data XML Elements
Description of Data
Report at least one Air Emission Testing Data record for each RATA Test. One record should
be reported for each on-site Qualified Individual from an Air Emission Testing Body who
conducted or oversaw the test. The Qualified Individual must be qualified for the methods
employed in the test.
QI Last Name
ElementName: QILastName
Report the last name of the on-site Qualified Individual who conducted or oversaw the test.
QI First Name
ElementName: QIFirstName
Report the first name of the on-site Qualified Individual who conducted or oversaw the test.
QI Middle Initial
ElementName: QIMiddlelnitial
Report the middle initial of the on-site Qualified Individual who conducted or oversaw the test.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 91
-------
March 11, 2015
2.5.9 RATA Air Emission Testing Data
AETB Name
ElementName: AETBName
Report the name of the Air Emission Testing Body that performed the test.
AETB Phone Number
ElementName: AETBPhoneNumber
Report the phone number of the Air Emission Testing Body that performed the test. The number
should contain dashes and be formatted as 999-999-9999.
AETB Email
ElementName: AETBEmail
Report the email address of the Air Emission Testing Body that performed the test.
ExamDate
ElementName: ExamDate
Report the date that the on-site Qualified Individual took and passed the relevant qualification
exam(s) for the reference method(s) that were performed during the test.
Provider Name
ElementName: ProviderName
Report the name of the provider(s) of the qualification test that took place on the exam date.
Provider Email
ElementName: ProviderEmail
Report the email address of the provider(s) of the qualification test that took place on the exam
date.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 92
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.6 Flow-to-Load Reference
March 11, 2015
2.6 Flow-to-Load Reference
Figure 25
Flow-to-Load Reference Data XML Structure
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 93
-------
March 11, 2015
2.6 Flow-to-Load Reference
Description of Data
For each primary and each redundant backup flow monitoring system, an evaluation of the flow-
to-load ratio or the gross heat rate (GHR) is required in each QA operating quarter (as defined in
40 CFR 72.2). Do not analyze data recorded by a redundant backup flow monitor unless
emissions data are reported from the system during the quarter. In order to perform the flow-to-
load ratio or GHR evaluation, a reference value of the flow-to-load ratio (Rref) or the gross heat
rate (GHRref) must be derived from data collected during the most recent passing normal-load
RATA for the flow monitor. This information is reported in a Flow-to-Load Reference Data
record. The Flow-to-Load Reference Data record must be submitted as a "child" of a Test
Summary Data record.
Specific Considerations
• When two levels are designated as normal in the Monitoring Load Data record for the
location, report Flow-to-Load Reference Data separately for each level (i.e., in two Test
Summary Data and Flow-to-Load Reference Data records).
• For a flow monitor on a common stack, Rref or GHRref is derived from the stack flow rate
and the combined unit loads for the units serving the stack. Report one Test Summary
Data and Flow-to-Load Reference Data record for the common stack under the
Monitoring System ID of the flow monitor at the stack. For example, if CS1 is a
common stack serving Units 1 and 2, report these records under the flow monitoring
system ID associated with common stack CS1.
• For flow monitors in a multiple stack (MS) configuration, Rref or GHRref may be
calculated for each monitor separately or on a combined basis for the unit, as follows:
— Derive a single Rref or GHRref from the sum of the flow rates in the individual stacks
or ducts and the unit load, and report the reference value multiple times (i.e., under
the Monitoring System ID of the flow monitor at each stack or duct); or
— Calculate separate reference ratios for each stack, using the average reference method
flow rates and unit load during the RATA for the individual flow monitors. If this
approach is chosen, report "1" in the Calc Separate Reference Indicator in the Flow-
to-Load Reference Data record.
• Units that do not produce electrical or steam load (e.g., cement kilns) are exempted from
the requirement to perform flow-to-load testing.
• Report either the reference flow-to-load ratio or the reference GHR, but not both,
depending upon which approach is used in the quarterly flow-to-load check. In the
unusual circumstance where the flow-to-load check is performed using the flow-to-load
ratio in one quarter and the GHR in another quarter and both are based on the same
reference RATA, report two separate flow-to-load-reference tests (Test Summary Data
plus Flow-To-Load Reference Data record), one containing the reference GHR and
one containing the reference flow-to-load ratio.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 94
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.6.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Flow-to-Load Reference
March 11, 2015
2.6.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Flow-to-Load Reference
Use the following instructions for completing each element of the Test Summary Data section
for Flow-to-Load Reference Data.
Unit ID or Stack Pipe ID
Element Name: UnitID or StackPipelD
Report the Unit ID or Stack Pipe ID that corresponds to the location of the flow monitoring
system.
Test Type Code
Element Name: TestTypeCode
Report the test type code as "F2LREF."
Monitoring System ID
Element Name: MonitoringSystemID
Report the three-character ID Monitoring System ID assigned to the flow monitor.
Component ID
Element Name: ComponentID
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to Flow-to-Load Reference Data.
Span Scale Code
Element Name: SpanScaleCode
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to Flow-to-Load Reference Data.
Test Number
Element Name: TestNumber
Report a test number that uniquely identifies this set of flow-to-load reference data for the
monitoring location. One method of tracking unique test numbers is to use the System ID as a
prefix to the number. The test number may not be reused at this location for another Flow-to-
Load Reference Data record. (This field is not the last RATA test number reported in the
Flow-to-Load Reference Data record, although the same number could be used if desired.)
Test Reason Code
Element Name: TestReasonCode
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to Flow-to-Load Reference Data.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 95
-------
March 11, 2015
2.6.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Flow-to-Load Reference
Test Description
Element Name: TestDescription
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to Flow-to-Load Reference Data.
Test Result Code
Element Name: TestResultCode
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to Flow-to-Load Reference Data.
Begin Date
Element Name: BeginDate
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to Flow-to-Load Reference Data.
Begin Hour
Element Name: BeginHour
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to Flow-to-Load Reference Data.
Begin Minute
Element Name: BeginMinute
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to Flow-to-Load Reference Data.
End Date
Element Name: EndDate
Report the run end date of the last run conducted at the normal operating level of the reference
RATA. Report the RATA Test Number and Operating Level Code of this operating level in the
associated Flow-to-Load Reference Data record.
End Hour
Element Name: EndHour
Report the hour of the last run of the most recent passing RATA conducted at the normal
operating level reported in the associated Flow-to-Load Reference Data record.
End Minute
Element Name: EndMinute
Report the minute of the last run of the most recent passing RATA conducted at the normal
operating level reported in the associated Flow-to-Load Reference Data record.
Grace Period Indicator
Element Name: GracePeriodlndicator
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to Flow-to-Load Reference Data.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 96
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.6.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Flow-to-Load Reference
March 11, 2015
Year
Element Name: Year
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to Flow-to-Load Reference Data.
Quarter
Element Name: Quarter
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to Flow-to-Load Reference Data.
Test Comment
Element Name: TestComment
Report a comment regarding the data if desired.
Injection Protocol Code
Element Name: InjectionProtocolCode
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to Flow-to-Load Reference Data.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 97
-------
March 11, 2015
2.6.2 Flow-to-Load Reference Data
2.6.2 Flow-to-Load Reference Data
Figure 26
Flow-to-Load Reference Data Elements
Flow-to-Load Reference Data Elements
Use the following instructions for completing each element of the Flow-to-Load Reference
Data record.
RATA Test Number
Element Name: RATATestNumber
Report the Test Number of the reference RATA. For a multiple stack configuration, if
performing the test on a combined basis, report the Test Number of the reference RATA
conducted at this location.
Operating Level Code
Element Name: OperatingLevelCode
Report the Operating Level Code (L, M, H, or N, as reported in the applicable RATA Summary
Data record) indicating the operating level from the reference flow RATA that is being used to
establish the flow-to-load or gross heat rate reference.
Average Gross Unit Load
Element Name: AverageGrossUnitLoad
Report Lavg, the average gross unit load, in megawatts, 1000 lb/hr of steam or mmBtu/hr thermal
output, as appropriate, at the reported operating level during the reference RATA.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 98
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.6.2 Flow-to-Load Reference Data
March 11, 2015
For common stacks, report the combined average load of all units that were operating during the
RATA.
For a multiple stack configuration, if performing the test on an individual stack basis, determine
Lavg by summing the gross unit load values for all of the runs at the reported operating level
during the reference RATA at this location, and dividing the result by the total number of runs.
For a multiple stack configuration, if performing the test on a combined basis, determine Lavg by
summing the gross unit load values for all of the runs at the reported operating level during the
reference RATAs for all of the multiple stacks, and dividing the result by the total number of
runs (e.g., for two 9-run RATAs performed on stacks MSI and MS2, add the load values for all
18 RATA runs and divide the result by 18).
Average Reference Method Flow
Element Name: AverageReferenceMethodFlow
Report the arithmetic mean of the stack flow rates in scfh (Qref) measured by EPA Reference
Method 2 (or its allowable alternatives) at the reported operating level of the reference RATA.
For a multiple stack configuration, if performing the test on a combined basis, calculate the mean
reference method flow rate by summing the mean reference method flow rates at the reported
operating level measured during the reference RATAs for all of the multiple stacks.
Reference Flow/Load Ratio
Element Name: ReferenceFlowLoadRatio
If the flow-to-load methodology was used, calculate and report Rref by dividing the average
reference method flow rate (Qref) by the average gross unit load (Lavg) and multiplying the result
by 10"5. Round the ratio to two decimal places.
Leave this field blank if the gross heat rate methodology for the quarterly flow monitor
evaluations was used.
Average Hourly Heat Input Rate
Element Name: AverageHourlyHeatlnputRate
If the gross heat rate methodology was used, use the appropriate equation from Appendix F to
Part 75 to calculate HLvg, the average hourly heat input during the reference RATA at the
reported operating level. In the Appendix F equation, use the average hourly CO2 concentration
recorded during the RATA test period and the average reference method flow rate. Report this
average hourly heat input rate, rounded to one decimal place.
Leave this field blank if the flow-to-load methodology for the quarterly flow monitor evaluations
was used.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 99
-------
March 11, 2015
2.6.2 Flow-to-Load Reference Data
Reference Gross Heat Rate
Element Name: ReferenceGrossHeatRate
If the gross heat rate methodology was used, calculate and report GHRref by dividing average
hourly heat input rate (HIavg) by the average gross unit load (Lavg) and multiplying the result by
1000. The units of the GHR will be either Btu/kw-hr, Btu/lb of steam or mmBtu per mmBtu of
steam load times 1000.
Leave this field blank if the flow-to-load methodology for the quarterly flow monitor evaluations
was used.
Calculated Separate Reference Indicator
Element Name: CalcSeparateReferencelndicator
For multiple stack configurations, report "1" if performing the flow-to-load test on an individual
stack basis or "0" if performing the test on a combined basis. For other configurations, leave this
field blank.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 100
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.7 Flow-to-Load Check
March 11, 2015
2.7 Flow-to-Load Check
Figure 27
Flow-to-Load Check XML Structure
*T«itQ—crtplo«i |
— *B«ginMinute |
—frEwdiD»to~|
"EndPirMite
-f
"TestB*«isCifWHoiitI
7o«Hckh j
-plurnl)ei{HHoursI)!cimleij5s~|
—r>^
l (XHOLM ttx
-------
March 11, 2015
2.7 Flow-to-Load Check
Description of Data
For each primary and each redundant backup flow monitoring system, a flow-to-load ratio or the
gross heat rate quality assurance test is required for every QA operating quarter, as described in
Section 2.2.5 of Appendix B to Part 75. Report the results of this check in a Test Summary
Data record with an associated Flow-to-Load Check Data record.
When two load levels are designated as normal in the Monitoring Load Data record, perform
the quarterly flow-to-load ratio or GHR evaluation at the higher load level if sufficient data are
available for the analysis. Otherwise, perform the evaluation at the lower load level. If the test
is performed at the higher load level, report a flow-to-load check only for that load level. If there
are insufficient data available at the higher load level (i.e., < 168 hours of quality-assured flow
rate data within ± ten percent of Lavg) and the test is done at the lower load level, report flow-to-
load checks for both load levels. Report the test result as "FEW168H" or "EXC168H" (as
appropriate) for the higher load level in the Test Summary Data record to indicate whether the
insufficient data availability was due to a lack of operating hours at the high load level within ±
ten percent of Lavg or due to the allowable exclusion of data. For the lower normal load report a
test result of "PASSED" or "FAILED" (as appropriate) in the Test Summary Data record. If
there are insufficient data at both load levels, report a flow-to-load check for both load levels,
indicating a test result of "FEW168H" or "EXC168H" (as appropriate) for both load levels. (See
also Table 23, "Flow-to-Load Result Codes and Descriptions," on page 103.)
Note that for a multiple stack configuration, if you elect to perform the data analysis on a
combined basis, rather than for each individual stack, you will obtain only a single test result,
since the flow-to-load ratio or GHR analysis is done at the unit level, not at the stack level.
However, you must report this same test result multiple times (i.e., once under each flow
Monitoring System ID associated with each of the multiple stacks).
Specific Considerations
Applicability of Flow-to-Load Checks
• Do not report a flow-to-load check for a redundant backup flow monitor unless stack
flow data from the monitor are reported in the emissions file for that quarter.
• Units that do not produce electrical or steam load (e.g., cement kilns) are exempted from
the requirement to perform flow-to-load testing.
Reporting Requirements for Flow-to-Load Checks
• For units or stacks for which you report data on a year-round basis, report flow-to-load
checks for each QA operating quarter (as defined in 40 CFR 72.2). For units or stacks
which report data only in the ozone season, report flow-to-load checks only for the
second and third calendar quarters, if those quarters are QA operating quarters (see
§75.74(c)(3 )(iii)).
• For non-QA operating quarters, report a flow-to-load check record using the code of
"FEW168H" to indicate that the units or stacks operated for less than 168 hours in the
quarter.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 102
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.7 Flow-to-Load Check
March 11, 2015
Monitors Applying Rectangular Duct WAFs
• For rectangular stacks or ducts with installed flow monitors, when applying a wall effects
adjustment factor (WAF) to the data from the flow monitor, the WAF is entered into the
programming of the flow monitor as a correction to the stack or duct cross-sectional area.
As soon as the wall effects correction is applied, the measured stack gas flow rates at a
given load level will decrease, possibly by five percent or more. This reduction in the
reported flow rates may adversely impact the quarterly flow-to-load (Q/L) ratio test, and
may even cause a test failure, if the data from the most recent normal load flow RATA
(i.e., the RATA on which the reference Q/L ratio is based) were not corrected for wall
effects. Note that this effect is only temporary, and will disappear when the next normal
load flow RATA is done and the appropriate WAF is applied to the reference method
data. However, in the interim period while the effect is still present, EPA recommends
the following:
— Report the reference flow-to-load ratio information in Flow-to-Load Reference
Data in the usual manner. Do not attempt to make any adjustment to the reference
method flow rate data recorded during the previous normal load RATA.
— Perform the quarterly flow-to-load ratio test in the usual manner and assess the
impact of the wall effects adjustment that was applied to the stack flow rates. If the
test is passed, report the results of the flow-to-load check in the usual manner.
— If the test is failed, the quarterly flow rate data may be copied, exported outside the
DAHS environment, and the wall effects correction may be removed from each
hourly flow rate, by dividing it by the WAF. Then, rerun the flow-to-load analysis.
Report these results as the flow-to-load check and put a note in the Test Comment
indicating that the WAF was removed from the flow rate data before running the
flow-to-load ratio test. Keep the results of the data analysis on-site, in a format
suitable for inspection.
• In the quarterly emissions file, the wall effects-adjusted flow rates must be reported in the
Monitor Hourly Value Data record, as measured by the flow monitor and as
recorded by the DAHS, whether or not the WAF is removed from the flow rate data to
perform the flow-to-load ratio test.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 103
-------
March 11, 2015
2.7.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Flow-to-Load Check
2.7.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Flow-to-Load Check
Use the following instructions for completing each element of the Test Summary Data record
for the flow-to-load check.
Unit ID or Stack Pipe ID
Element Name: UnitID or StackPipelD
Report the Stack Pipe ID or Unit ID of the location of the flow monitoring system.
Test Type Code
Element Name: TestTypeCode
Report the test type code as "F2LCHK."
Component ID
Element Name: ComponentID
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to flow-to-load checks.
Monitoring System ID
Element Name: MonitoringSystemID
Report the three-character Monitoring System ID of the flow monitoring system.
Span Scale Code
Element Name: SpanScaleCode
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to flow-to-load checks.
Test Number
Element Name: TestNumber
Assign and report a unique test number for the flow-to-load check. One method of tracking
unique test numbers is to use the Monitoring System ID as a prefix to the number. The test
number may not be reused at this location for another flow-to-load check.
Test Reason Code
Element Name: TestReasonCode
Report "QA" as the purpose of the test.
Test Description
Element Name: TestDescription
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to flow-to-load checks.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 104
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.7.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Flow-to-Load Check
March 11,2015
Test Result Code
Element Name: TestResuItCode
Report the appropriate code from Table 23 below to indicate the result of the test.
Table 23
Flow-to-Load Test Result Codes and Descriptions
Code
Description
LXC168H
Fewer than 168 hours of flow rate data after allowable exclusions
FAILED
Test was failed
FEW168H
Fewer than 168 hours of flow rate data within ± 10% of b„K
PASSED
Test was passed
If the arithmetic average of the absolute percent differences between the reference value and the
hourly values (Ef) is within the applicable limit in Part 75, App. B, Section 2.2,5, report the result
as "PASSED." If Ef is not within the applicable limit, report the result as "FAILED."
Report' the result as "FEW168H" if a flow-to-load analysis is not required for the monitoring
system because there are fewer than 168 hours of quality-assured flow rate data recorded by the
system during the quarter at loads within ± ten percent of Lavg. A test result of "FEW168H" may
be due to infrequent unit operation or infrequent usage of a flow monitoring system (e.g., a
redunda.it backup flow monitoring system, which is used for less than 168 hours in a quarter).
Report the result as "EXC168H" if fewer than 168 hours of quality-assured flow rate data remain
for analysis after excluding hourly flow rate data from the analysis for the allowable reasons
described below in the Flow-to-Load Check Data record.
Begin Date
Element Name: BeginDate
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to flow-to-load checks.
Begin Hour
Element Name: BeginHour
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to flow-to-load checks.
Begin Minute
Element Name: BeginMinute
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to flow-to-load checks.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions — Page 105
-------
March 11, 2015
2.7.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Flow-to-Load Check
End Date
Element Name: EndDate
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to flow-to-load checks.
End Hour
Element Name: EndHour
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to flow-to-load checks.
End Minute
Element Name: EndMinute
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to flow-to-load checks.
Grace Period Indicator
Element Name: GracePeriodlndicator
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to flow-to-load checks.
Year
Element Name: Year
Report the year during which the test was performed.
Quarter
Element Name: Quarter
Report the quarter during which the test was performed.
Test Comment
Element Name: TestComment
Report a comment regarding the test if desired.
Injection Protocol Code
Element Name: InjectionProtocolCode
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to flow-to-load checks.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 106
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.7,2 Flow-to-Load Check Data
March 11,2015
2.7.2 Flow-to-Load Check Data
Figure 28
Flow-to-Load Check Data XML Elements
lestBasisCode
—j TSiasAdjustedlndieator
AvgAbsolutePei centDrff
Number OfHnuis
I'MumbcrOfHourBfxchidedforFuel j
-|~ Number OffloursExcluriedRampincj
h Numbui OfHoui sExcludedBypass
Number OflloursExcludedPreRAI A
—T' NumberOfHoursExcluded Test
°Oper«iinqLietfelCode~|i
Flow-to-Load Check Data Elements
Use the following instructions for completing each element of the Flow-to-Load Chick Data
record.
Test Basis ( ode
Element Same: TestBasisCode
Report the Test Basis Code for flow-to-load or gross heat rate methodology for the quarterly data
analysis as shown in Table 24.
Table 24
Test Basis Indicator Codes and Descriptions for Flow-to-Load Check
Code
Description
H
Gross Heat Rate
Q
Flow-to-Load Ratio
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions — Page 107
-------
March 11, 2015
2.7.2 Flow-to-Load Check Data
Leave this field blank if you report a result code of "EXC168H" or "FEW168H" in the Test
Summary Data record.
Bias Adjusted Indicator
Element Name: BiasAdjustedlndicator
Report whether bias-adjusted flow rate values have been used in the quarterly flow-to-load ratio
data analysis (" 1" if "yes" or "0" if "no"). All flow-to-load ratios or GHRs must be calculated in
a consistent manner (i.e., using unadjusted flow rates in all calculations or using bias-adjusted
flow rates in all calculations).
Leave this field blank if you report a result code of "EXC168H" or "FEW168H" in the Test
Summary Data record.
Average Absolute Percent Difference
Element Name: AvgAbsolutePercentDiff
Report the value of Ef, which is the arithmetic average of the absolute percent differences
between the reference flow-to-load ratio (Rref) or gross heat rate (GHRref) and the individual
hourly flow-to-load ratios or hourly GHRs used in the data analysis.
Leave this field blank if you report a result code of "EXC168H" or "FEW168H" in the Test
Summary Data record.
Number of Hours
Element Name: NumberOfHours
Report the number of hours of quality-assured flow rate data that were used for the flow-to-load
or GHR evaluation of the flow monitoring system. A minimum of 168 hours of quality-assured
flow rate data are required.
Leave this field blank if you report a result code of "EXC168H" or "FEW168H" in the Test
Summary Data record.
Number of Hours Excluded for Fuel
Element Name: NumberOJHoursExcludedForFuel
When reporting a result code of "EXC168H," report the number of hours (if any) of flow rate
data excluded from the flow-to-load or GHR analysis because the fuel combusted was different
than the fuel combusted during the reference flow RATA. A fuel is considered different if it is
in a different state of matter (solid, liquid, or gas) from the fuel burned during the RATA or if the
fuel is a different classification of coal (e.g., bituminous versus sub-bituminous). Also, for units
that co-fire different types of fuel, if the reference RATA was done while co-firing, then hours in
which a single fuel was combusted may be excluded from the data analysis (and vice-versa for
co-fired hours, if the reference RATA was done while combusting only one type of fuel).
Leave this field blank if you are not claiming any excluded hours for this reason.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 108
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.7.2 Flow-to-Load Check Data
March 11, 2015
Number of Hours Excluded for Ramping
Element Name: NumberOJHoursExcludedRamping
When reporting a result code of "EXC168H," report the number of hours (if any) of flow rate
data excluded from the data analysis because of ramping (i.e., the hourly load differed by more
than +/- 15 percent from the load during the previous or subsequent hour). Also use this field to
report hours where the unit did not operate within +/- 10 percent of the average load during the
most recent normal-load flow RATA.
Leave this field blank if you are not claiming any excluded hours for this reason.
Number of Hours Excluded for Bypass
Element Name: NumberOJHoursExcludedBypass
When reporting a result code of "EXC168H" for units with wet scrubbers, report the number of
hours (if any) of flow rate data excluded from the data analysis because the scrubber was entirely
bypassed.
Leave this field blank if you are not claiming any excluded hours for this reason.
Number of Hours Excluded Pre RATA
Element Name: NumberOJHoursExcludedPreRA TA
When reporting a result code of "EXC168H," if a normal load flow RATA of the monitoring
system was performed and passed during the quarter, you may exclude all flow rate data
recorded by the monitoring system prior to completion of the RATA from the flow-to-load or
GHR analysis. Report the number of hours (if any) of flow rate data excluded for this reason.
Leave this field blank if you are not claiming any excluded hours for this reason.
Number of Hours Excluded Test
Element Name: NumberOJHoursExcludedTest
When reporting a result code of "EXC168H," if a documented repair or major flow monitor
component replacement occurred during the quarter to correct a problem with the flow
monitoring system accuracy, and if a subsequent abbreviated flow-to-load test was passed in
accordance with Section 2.2.5.3 of Appendix B to Part 75 to verify that the monitoring system
was generating accurate data, you may exclude all flow rate data recorded by the monitoring
system prior to completion of the abbreviated flow-to-load test from the flow-to-load or GHR
analysis. Report the number of hours (if any) of flow rate data excluded for this reason.
Leave this field blank if you are not claiming any excluded hours for this reason.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 109
-------
March 11, 2015
2.7.2 Flow-to-Load Check Data
Number of Hours Excluded for Main and Bypass
Element Name: NumberOfHoursExcMainBypass
When reporting a result code of "EXC168H" for a unit with a main stack and a bypass stack
(e.g., a unit with a wet scrubber), report the number of hours (if any) of flow rate data excluded
from the flow-to-load or GHR analysis because flue gases were flowing through both stacks
simultaneously.
Leave this field blank if you are not claiming any excluded hours for this reason.
Operating Level Code
Element Name: OperatingLevelCode
Report the Operating Level Code (L, M, H or N, as reported in the corresponding Flow-to-
Load Reference Data record) indicating the operating level represented by this flow-to-load or
gross heat rate check.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 110
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.8 Online Offline Calibration Error Demonstration
March 11, 2015
2.8 Online Offline Calibration Error Demonstration
Figure 29
Online Offline Calibration Error Demonstration XML Structure
TettSummajryDitH
— - Sf»S£§i@CO«fe
* Mo Sy»K rnIO ]
^CCKTiponantlO |
"Testiutsher
' TraNMuonCad*
Report only one Online
Offline Calibration Data
record per off-line
calibration
demonstration
-^OoiiMftiol.lilwwWw [
i, 1
—P QW«n« Up «:¦»!« » ure
Ci^yyri.itlrif. rrfr"]
S >n
-Ppw^LpnttittPsma'c^K j
—j'o.- «it;"tmii,ttiig.-o»'t]
-•|,ClniirifVF'Cnt<- ]
-|TJ'*i (*i.i Mllelnjtx' nr&«te ]
On n*Z«tntn n.l»Wla« [
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 111
-------
March 11, 2015
2.8 Online Offline Calibration Error Demonstration
Description of Data
Use of an offline daily calibration error check (a calibration error test performed during a period
in which a unit is not operating) to validate CEMS data, requires a demonstration that the results
of an offline calibration are comparable to the results of an online calibration. Report the overall
result of this comparison in a Test Summary Data record and report results of all gas injections
(or flow reference signals) in one Online Offline Injection Data record.
Specific Considerations
Applicability of Online Offline Calibration Error Demonstration
• Report online offline calibration error tests for each range of a dual-range analyzer as
separate tests even if both ranges of the analyzer are identified by a single Component ID.
• This demonstration is not applicable to Hg, HC1, and HF CEMS.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 112
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.8.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Online Offline Calibration
March 11, 2015
2.8.1 Test summary data Elements for Online Offline Calibration
Use the following instructions for completing each element of the Test Summary Data section
for the online offline calibration error test.
Unit ID or Stack Pipe ID
Element Name: UnitID or StackPipelD
Report the Unit ID or Stack Pipe ID that corresponds to the location of the analyzer.
Test Type Code
Element Name: TestTypeCode
Report the test type code as "ONOFF."
Monitoring System ID
Element Name: MonitoringSystemID
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to online offline calibration error tests.
Component ID
Element Name: ComponentID
Report the three-character Component ID assigned to the analyzer.
Span Scale Code
Element Name: SpanScaleCode
Report the analyzer range of the component tested as "H" for high or "L" for low. For single
range monitors, report the scale as "H" unless you are using the default high range option (see
Part 75, Appendix A, Sections 2.1.1.4(f) and 2.1.2.4(e)), in which case report the scale as "L."
Test Number
Element Name: TestNumber
At each monitoring location and for each test type, report a unique test number for each set of
records which comprises a single test. One method of tracking unique test numbers is to use the
Component ID as a prefix to the number. The test number may not be reused at this location for
another online offline calibration error test.
Test Reason Code
Element Name: TestReasonCode
Report the purpose of the test using the appropriate code from Table 25.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 113
-------
March IL 2015
2.8.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Online Offline Calibration
Table 25
Online Offline Calibration Test Reason Codes and Descriptions
( Olit'
l)t-si i ipiinii
INITIAL
Initial Demonstration
DIAG
Diagnostic (Repeat the demonstration after a change to the CEMS)
Test Description
Element Name: TestDescription
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to online offline calibration error tests.
Test Result Code
Element Name: TestResultCode
Report the appropriate code from Table 26 below to indicate the result of the test.
Table 26
Online Offline Calibration Test Result Codes and Descriptions
r i»rip
Description
PASSED
Test was passed and the alternate performance specification was not used.
PASSAPS
Test was passed using the alternative performance specification for one or more
gas injectkm(s).
Note: Report only the results of passed offline/online calibration demonstrations in this record.
If the test is failed, then offline calibrations may not be used for data validation until a
subsequent online'offline calibration demonstration is passed. If the offline portion of the test
fails, this has no effect on data validation and need not be reported, provided that von continue to
perform and pass the required online calibrations. If the online portion of the test fails, but is still
within the allowable control limits specified for daily calibrations in Section 2.1.4(a) of Part 75,
Appendix B, the monitor is mot out-of-control — in that case, simply report the results of the
online calibration. However, if the online calibration error is outside the allowable daily control
limits, then the monitor is out-of-control. Should that occur, report the results of the failed
online calibration error test and use missing data substitution, as appropriate
Begin Date
Element Name: BegitiDnle
Report the date of the first injection in the test.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions — Page 114
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.8.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Online Offline Calibration
March 11, 2015
Begin Hour
Element Name: BeginHour
Report the hour of the first injection in the test.
Begin Minute
Element Name: BeginMinute
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to online offline calibration error tests.
End Date
Element Name: EndDate
Report the date of the last injection in the test.
End Hour
Element Name: EndHour
Report the hour of the last injection in the test.
End Minute
Element Name: EndMinute
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to online offline calibration error tests.
Grace Period Indicator
Element Name: GracePeriodlndicator
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to online offline calibration error tests.
Year
Element Name: Year
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to online offline calibration error tests.
Quarter
Element Name: Quarter
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to online offline calibration error tests.
Test Comment
Element Name: TestComment
Report a comment regarding the test if desired.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 115
-------
March 11, 2015
2.8.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Online Offline Calibration
Injection Protocol Code
Element Name: InjectionProtocolCode
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to online offline calibration error tests.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 116
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.8.2 Online Offline Calibration Data
March 11, 2015
2.8.2 Online Offline Calibration Data
Figure 30
Online Offline Calibration Data XML Elements
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 117
-------
March 11, 2015
2.8.2 Online Offline Calibration Data
Online Offline Calibration Data Elements
Submit one Online Offline Calibration Data record for each demonstration. Use the
following instructions for completing each element of the Online Offline Calibration Data
record.
Online Zero Reference Value
Element Name: OnlineZeroReference Value
Report the calibration gas or reference signal value used in the online zero-level injection.
Online Upscale Reference Value
Element Name: Online UpscaleReference Value
Report the calibration gas or reference signal value used in the online upscale-level injection.
Offline Zero Reference Value
Element Name: OfflineZeroReference Value
Report the calibration gas or reference signal value used in the offline zero-level injection.
Offline Upscale Reference Value
Element Name: Offline UpscaleReference Value
Report the calibration gas or reference signal value used in the offline upscale-level injection.
Online Zero Measured Value
Element Name: OnlineZeroMeasuredValue
Report the value measured by the instrument in response to the reference following the online
zero-level gas injection or reference signal.
Online Upscale Measured Value
Element Name: Online UpscaleMeasuredValue
Report the value measured by the instrument in response to the reference following the online
upscale-level gas injection or reference signal.
Offline Zero Measured Value
Element Name: OfflineZeroMeasuredValue
Report the value measured by the instrument in response to the reference following the offline
zero-level gas injection or reference signal.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 118
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.8.2 Online Offline Calibration Data
March 11, 2015
Offline Upscale Measured Value
Element Name: Offline UpscaleMeasuredValue
Report the value measured by the instrument in response to the reference following the offline
upscale-level gas injection or reference signal.
Online Zero Calibration Error
Element Name: OnlineZeroCalibrationError
Report the results of the calibration error (CE) test for the online zero-level injection, as required
by Part 75.
For SO2, NOx, and flow monitors, express the results either as a percentage of the span value
(i.e., CE), or (for low emitters of SO2, and NOx or for low-span differential pressure flow
monitors) as the absolute value of the difference between the reference value and the measured
value (i.e., |R - A|). If the calibration error meets the standard specification, report the CE even
though the test would also pass the alternative specification. Only when the result does not pass
the standard specification, but meets the alternative specification, should you report |R - A|. If
the test does not pass either specification, report the CE.
For low-span differential pressure-type flow monitors that are calibrated on an H2O basis and
that use the alternative specification: (1) report "0.0" in this field if the value of |R - A| is < 0.01
inches of water; or (2) report "0.1" in this field if the value of |R - A| is > 0.01, but < 0.10 inches
of water; or (3) if the value of |R - A| is > 0.10 inches of water, report the result to the nearest 0.1
in. H2O. For CO2 and O2 monitors, express the result as in terms of absolute percent CO2 or O2,
since the results are always determined as the absolute value of the difference between the
reference value and the measured value (i.e., |R - A|).
Online Upscale Calibration Error
Element Name: Online UpscaleCalibrationError
Report the results of the calibration error test for the online upscale-level injection, as required
by Part 75. (See the discussion under Online Zero Calibration Error element description for
more details.)
Offline Zero Calibration Error
Element Name: OfflineZeroCalibrationError
Report the results of the calibration error test for the offline zero-level injection, as required by
Part 75. (See the discussion under Online Zero Calibration Error element description for more
details.)
Offline Upscale Calibration Error
Element Name: Offline UpscaleCalibrationError
Report the results of the calibration error test for the offline upscale-level injection, as required
by Part 75. (See the discussion under Online Zero Calibration Error element description for
more details.)
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 119
-------
March 11, 2015
2.8.2 Online Offline Calibration Data
Upscale Gas Level Code
Element Name: UpscaleGasLevelCode
Indicate whether the upscale gas injections or reference signals are "HIGH" or "MID." Mid-
level gas injections in lieu of the high-level injections may be performed and reported, provided
that the mid-level gas is more representative of the actual stack emissions.
Online Zero APS Indicator
Element Name: OnlineZeroAPSIndicator
Report whether the online zero-level test result was determined using a normal specification "0"
or the alternative performance specification "1" allowed under Part 75.
Appendix A to Part 75 specifies that the calibration error of an O2 or CO2 monitor is always
expressed in percent O2 or CO2, rather than as a percentage of span. This is considered to be the
"normal" calibration error specification; therefore, "0" should be reported in this field. The
alternate performance specification applies only to SO2, and NOx pollutant concentration
monitors that are considered low-emitters of those pollutants and to low-span differential
pressure flow monitors.
Online Upscale APS Indicator
Element Name: Online UpscaleAPSIndicator
Report whether the online upscale-level test result was determined using a normal specification
"0" or the alternative performance specification "1" allowed under Part 75. (See discussion
under Online Zero APS Indicator for more details.)
Offline Zero APS Indicator
Element Name: Offline ZeroAPSIndicator
Report whether the offline zero-level test result was determined using a normal specification "0"
or the alternative performance specification "1" allowed under Part 75. (See discussion under
Online Zero APS Indicator for more details.)
Offline Upscale APS Indicator
Element Name: Offline Upscale APSIndicator
Report whether the offline upscale-level test result was determined using a normal specification
"0" or the alternative performance specification "1" allowed under Part 75. (See discussion
under Online Zero APS Indicator for more details.)
Online Zero Injection Date
Element Name: OnlineZeroInjectionDate
Report the date of the zero-level gas injection for the online calibration test.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 120
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
2.8.2 Online Offline Calibration Data
March 11, 2015
Online Upscale Injection Date
Element Name: Online UpscalelnjectionDate
Report the date when the upscale-level gas injection for the online calibration test was
completed.
Offline Zero Injection Date
Element Name: OfflineZeroInjectionDate
Report the date when the zero-level gas injection for the offline calibration test was completed.
Offline Upscale Injection Date
Element Name: Offline UpscalelnjectionDate
Report the date when the upscale-level gas injection for the offline calibration test was
completed.
Online Zero Injection Hour
Element Name: OnlineZeroInjectionHour
Report the hour when the zero-level gas injection for the online calibration test was completed.
Online Upscale Injection Hour
Element Name: Online UpscalelnjectionHour
Report the hour was the upscale-level gas injection for the online calibration test was completed.
Offline Zero Injection Hour
Element Name: OfflineZeroInjectionHour
Report the hour was the zero-level gas injection for the offline calibration test was completed.
Offline Upscale Injection Hour
Element Name: Offline UpscalelnjectionHour
Report the hour was the upscale-level gas injection for the offline calibration test was completed.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 121
-------
March 11, 2015
3.1 Appendix E Correlation Test
3.0 Non-CEM Tests
3.1 Appendix E Correlation Test
Figure 31
Appendix E Correlation Test XML Structure
* LP-"*
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 122
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
3.1 Appendix E Correlation Test
March 11, 2015
Description of Data
To establish a NOx/heat input rate correlation curve based on Appendix E to Part 75, you must
perform reference method testing at a minimum of four load levels. Report the overall test
information in a Test Summary Data record and report the test results at each load level in the
App E Correlation Test Summary Data record. The number of records required corresponds
to the number of loads tested. For example, if the Appendix E test is performed at four unique
load levels, report four App E Correlation Test Summary Data records. Report the test data
from a minimum of three runs for each load level in the App E Correlation Test Run Data
record.
Report a companion Appendix E Heat Input from Oil Data record for any Appendix E test
used to establish a NOx emission rate curve for use during hours in which oil is combusted. An
Appendix E Heat Input from Oil Data record verifies the calculation of heat input during the
run. There should be one Appendix E Heat Input from Oil Data record for each run reported
in an App E Correlation Test Run Data record when any of the fuel combusted was oil.
Report a companion Appendix E Heat Input from Gas Data record for any Appendix E test
used to establish a NOx emission rate curve for use during hours in which gas is combusted. An
Appendix E Heat Input from Gas Data record verifies the calculation of heat input during the
run. There should be one Appendix E Heat Input from Gas Data record for each run reported
in an App E Correlation Test Run Data record when any of the fuel combusted was gas.
If you are establishing a correlation curve based on a consistent fuel mixture, report the
appropriate combination of Appendix E Heat Input from Oil Data record(s) and/or Appendix
E Heat Input from Gas Data record(s) for each run.
Specific Considerations
Aborted or Invalid Tests
• If a test is aborted or if certain test runs are discarded as invalid, keep a record of this in
the test log, but do not report partial tests or invalid runs in the App E Correlation Test
Run Data record. The only acceptable reasons for aborting a test or discarding test runs
are: (1) the reference test method was not used properly or malfunctioned; or (2) a
problem with the unit or process prevented the test from being done at the load level or
conditions specified in the regulation.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 123
-------
March 11, 2015
3.1.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Appendix E Correlation Test
3.1.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Appendix E Correlation Test
Use the following instructions for completing each element of the Test Summary Data section
for the Appendix E correlation test.
Unit ID or Stack Pipe ID
Element Name: UnitID or StackPipelD
Report the Unit ID or Stack Pipe ID that corresponds to the test location.
Test Type Code
Element Name: TestTypeCode
Report the test type code as "APPE."
Monitoring System ID
Element Name: MonitoringSystemID
Report the three-character Monitoring System ID assigned to the NOx Appendix E (NOXE)
system.
Component ID
Element Name: ComponentID
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to Appendix E correlation tests.
Span Scale Code
Element Name: SpanScaleCode
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to Appendix E correlation tests.
Test Number
Element Name: TestNumber
At each monitoring location and for each test type, report a unique test number for each set of
records which comprises a single test. One method of tracking unique test numbers is to use the
Monitoring System ID as a prefix to the number. The test number may not be reused at this
location for another Appendix E correlation test.
Test Reason Code
Element Name: TestReasonCode
Report the purpose of the test using the appropriate code from Table 27. Use the code RECERT
only for unscheduled retests that are required when the unit operates outside of its quality
assurance parameters for more than 16 consecutive unit operating hours, or when a new
correlation curve must be generated to represent a significant change in the manner of unit
operation or NOxemissions control.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 124
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
3.1.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Appendix E Correlation Test
March 11,2015
Table 27
Appendix E Test Reason Codes and Descriptions
Code
Description
INITIAL
Initial Certification
QA
Periodic Quality Assurance
RECERT
Reeertifieation
Test Description
Element Name; TestDescription
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to Appendix E correlation tests.
Test Result Code
Element Name: TestResultCode
Leave this field Hank. It does not apply to Appendix E correlation tests.
Begin Date
Element Name: BeginDate
Report the begin date of the first run of the test.
Begin Hour
Element Name: BeginHour
Report the begin hour of the first run of the test.
Begin Minute
Element Name: BeginMinute
Report the begin minute of the first run of the test.
End Date
Element Name: EndDate
Report the end date of the last run of the test.
End Hour
Element Name: EvdHour
Report the end hour of the last run of the test.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions — Page 125
-------
March 11, 2015
3.1.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Appendix E Correlation Test
End Minute
Element Name: EndMinute
Report the end minute of the last run of the test.
Grace Period Indicator
Element Name: GracePeriodlndicator
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to Appendix E correlation tests.
Year
Element Name: Year
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to Appendix E correlation tests.
Quarter
Element Name: Quarter
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to Appendix E correlation tests.
Test Comment
Element Name: TestComment
Report any comments regarding the test. Additionally, for tests conducted after January 1, 2009,
EPA encourages use of this field to report the name of the stack testing company, the lead tester
and whether testing was conducted in accordance with ASTM D7036.
Injection Protocol Code
Element Name: InjectionProtocolCode
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to Appendix E correlation tests.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 126
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
3.1.2 Appendix E Correlation Test Summary Data
July 2014
3.1.2 Appendix E Correlation Test Summary Data
Figure 32
App E Correlation Test Summary Data XML Elements
1 ,.0B
App E Correlation Test Summary Data Elements
Operating Level for Run
Element Name: OperatingLevelForRun
Report the operating level represented by the data, using "1" as the lowest level.
Mean Reference Value
Element Name: MeanReferenceValue
Calculate and report the average NOx emission rate (lb/mmBtu) from all runs at this operating
level (as reported in the App E Correlation Test Run Data records). Round the average to
three decimal places.
Average Hourly Heat Input Rate
Element Name: AverageHourlyHeatlnputRate
Calculate and report the average heat input rate (mmBtu/hr) from all runs at this operating level.
Round to one decimal place.
F-Factor
Element Name: FFactor
Report the F-factor used to calculate the NOx emission rate for the runs. This F-factor must be
consistent with the type of fuel or mixture of fuels combusted during the test.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 127
-------
March 11, 2015
3.1.3 Appendix E Correlation Test Run Data
3.1.3 Appendix E Correlation Test Run Data
Figure 33
App E Correlation Test Run Data XML Elements
Appendix E Correlation Test Run Data Elements
Use the following instructions for completing each element of the App E Correlation Test
Run Data record.
Run Number
Element Name: RunNumber
Assign a run number to each run. You may assign run numbers either consecutively for each test
(i.e., run numbers one through twelve for each of the three runs at four load levels) or for each
load level within the test (i.e., one through three for the runs at each load level). At a minimum,
runs must be numbered consecutively in time order within a load level. Within a load level, do
not skip or repeat a run number.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 128
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
3.1.3 Appendix E Correlation Test Run Data
March 11, 2015
Reference Value
Element Name: Reference Value
Report the reference method NOx value for the run in lbs/mmBtu, rounded to three decimal
places.
Hourly Heat Input Rate
Element Name: HourlyHeatlnputRate
Report the total heat input divided by the duration of the run (as calculated from the begin and
end times) to get the heat input by minute. Multiply this value by 60 minutes to get the Hourly
Heat Input Rate.
Total Heat Input
Element Name: TotalHeatlnput
Report the total heat input in mmBtu for the time period of the run. This value should be the
sum of the values reported in the Appendix E Heat Input from Oil Data records or the
Appendix E Heat Input from Gas Data records for the run.
Response Time
Element Name: Response Time
Report the response time in seconds, according to Sections 8.2.5 and 8.2.6 of Method 7E in
Appendix A-4 to 40 CFR Part 60. This value is used to determine the appropriate sampling time
at each point.
Begin Date
Element Name: BeginDate
Report the date on which the run began.
Begin Hour
Element Name: BeginHour
Report the hour in which the run began.
Begin Minute
Element Name: BeginMinute
Report the minute in which the run began.
End Date
Element Name: EndDate
Report the date on which the run ended.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 129
-------
March 11, 2015
3.1.3 Appendix E Correlation Test Run Data
End Hour
Element Name: EndHour
Report the hour in which the run ended.
End Minute
Element Name: EndMinute
Report the minute in which the run ended.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 130
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
3.1.4 Appendix E Heat Input From Oil Data
March 11, 2015
3.1.4 Appendix E Heat Input from Oil Data
Figure 34
Appendix E Heat Input from Oil Data XML Elements
Appendix E Heat Input from Oil Data Elements
Instructions for completing each element of the Appendix E Heat Input from Oil Data record
are provided below.
Monitoring System ID
Element Name: MonitoringSystemID
Report the three-character Monitoring System ID assigned to the oil fuel flow (OILV or OILM)
system used to measure oil flow during the run.
Oil Mass
Element Name: OilMass
This value is either measured directly by a fuel flowmeter system or calculated from the volume
of oil measured by a fuel flowmeter system. All values must be reported in units of pounds (oil
mass), not as oil mass flow rate.
Use an equation similar to Equation D-3 in Appendix D to Part 75 to convert oil volume to mass
(in lbs), where the density of the oil is determined by the applicable ASTM procedures in Part
75.
Leave this field blank if you use the oil volume and gross calorific value (GCV) to determine
heat input for the run.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 131
-------
March IL 2015
3.1,4 Appendix E Heat Input From Oil Data
Oil GCV
Element Name: OilGCV
Report flie heat content or GCV of the oil used to calculate heat input during the me. Report this
value in units consistent with the units used to report the mass or volume of oil combusted as
described below.
Oil GCV Units of Measure Code
Element Name: OilGCVUnitsOfMeasureCode
Report the units of measure for GCV which correspond to the mass or volume of oil combusted
and are used in the calculation of heat input during the ran. Use one of the uppercase codes
shown in Table 28.
Table 28
Oil GCV Units of Measure Codes and Descriptions
( mit
Dcm i iption
BTUBBL
Btu per barrel
BTUGAL
Btu per gallon
BTULB
Btu per pound
BTUMS
Btu per cubic meter
BTUSCF
Btu per standard cubic feet
Oil Heat Input
Element Name: OilHeatlnput
Calculate and report the total heat input from oil by multiplying the heat content (GCV) of the
fuel by either the oil mass or the oil volume combusted during the ran Report this value in units
of imnBtu rounded to one decimal place.
Oil Volume
Element Name: OilVolume
If the fuel flow system measures the volumetric flow of oil, report the volume of oil combusted
during the ran as measured.
Leave this blank if the fuel flow system measures mass of oil directly.
Oil Volume Units of Measure Code
Element Name: OilVolumeUnitsOfMeasureCode
Report the units of measure for vohunetric flow using one of the uppercase codes shown in Table
29.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions — Page 132
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
3.1.4 Appendix E Heat Input From Oil Data
March 11,2015
Table 29
Oil Volume Units of Measure Codes and Descriptions
Code
Description
BBL
Barrel
GAL
Gallon
Mi
Cubic meter
SCF
Standard cubic feet
Use corresponding units for gross calorific value of the fuel if calculating hourly heat input
directly from the volumetric flow.
Oil Density
Element Name: OilDensity
If you use a volumetric oil flowmeter and convert the volumetric flow rates to mass flow, the
density of the oil must be sampled in order to calculate the mass of oil during the run.
Leave this field blank if you calculate heat input directly from the oil volumetric flow rate.
Oil Density Units of Measure ( ode
Element Name: OilDensityUmtsOfMeasureCode
If sampling and reporting the density of the oil, report the units of measure for density using one
of the uppercase codes in Table 30. Otherwise, leave this field blank. These units must
correspond to the units of measure for oil volume as shown by Table 29 in the Oil Volume Units
of Measure data element description.
Table 30
Oil Density Units of Measure Codes and Descriptions
Code
Dfst i jpiiiMi
LBBBL
Pounds per barrel
LBGAL
Pounds per gallon
LBM3
Pounds per cubic meter
LBSCF
Pounds per standard cubic feet
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions — Page 133
-------
March 11, 2015
3.1.5 Appendix E Heat Input From Gas Data
3.1.5 Appendix E Heat Input from Gas Data
Figure 35
Appendix E Heat Input from Gas Data XML Elements
MonitoringSystemiD
AppendbcEHeatinputFromGasD.... (
— Gastieatfnput
Appendix E Heat Input From Gas Data XML Elements
Use the following instructions for completing each element of the Appendix E Heat Input from
Gas Data record.
Monitoring System ID
Element Name: MonitoringSystemiD
Report the three-character Monitoring System ID assigned to the gas fuel flow (GAS) system
used to measure gas flow during the run.
Gas GCV
Element Name: GasGCV
Report the heat content or gross calorific value (GCV) of the gas from the appropriate sample to
calculate heat input during the run. Report this value in Btu per 100 scf (BTUHSCF).
Gas Volume
Element Name: GasVolume
This value is the gas measured directly by a gas fuel flowmeter system during the run. All
values must be reported in units of 100 standard cubic feet (gas volumes), not as gas volumetric
flow rates.
Gas Heat Input
Element Name: GasHeatlnput
Calculate and report the total heat input from gas by multiplying the heat content (GCV) of the
fuel by the volume of gas combusted. Report this value in units of mmBtu rounded to one
decimal place.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 134
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
3.1.6 Appendix E Protocol Gas Data
March 11, 2015
3.1.6 Appendix E Protocol Gas Data
Figure 36
Appendix E Protocol Gas Data XML Elements
Description of Data
For Appendix E tests conducted using Method 6C, 7E, or 3A report one record for each
cylinder used to determine analyzer calibration error, drift, and system bias. A minimum of three
records should be reported, one for each gas level (High, Mid, and Low).
Specific Considerations
• You must report a Protocol Gas Data record when using standard reference material,
NIST-traceable reference material, gas manufacturer's intermediate standard, research
gas mixture, or SRM-equivalent compressed gas primary reference material in place of
an EPA Protocol gas. Report all data elements in this record except the PGVP Vendor ID
and the Expiration Date of the cylinder.
• You must report a Protocol Gas Data record when using purified air material as the
high-level O2 gas. Do not report the Cylinder ID, PGVP Vendor ID, and the Expiration
Date of the cylinder.
• For tests conducted using EPA Reference Method 3 A, 6C, or 7E, report Gas Type Code
"ZERO" if a zero gas is used as the low level calibration gas of the reference analyzer. Do
not report the Cylinder ID, PGVP Vendor ID, and the Expiration Date of the cylinder.
• Per 75.21(g)(6), you may use a non-expired EPA Protocol gas acquired from a vendor not
participating in the PGVP as long as the cylinder was acquired prior to 60 days after the
final rule is published in the FR. Report a Protocol Gas Data record for each cylinder
acquired from a vendor not participating in the PGVP program. Report all data elements,
reporting "NONPGVP" as the PGVP Vendor ID.
• When conducting a RATA of a NOX-diluent monitoring system, report a a PROTOCOL
Gas Data record for each cylinder used to determine analyzer calibration error, drift, and
system bias for both the NOX and the diluents components of the system. If you use
Environmental Protection Agency Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 135
-------
March 11, 2015
3.1.6 Appendix E Protocol Gas Data
separate cylinders for the NOX and the diluent gas, you should report at least six records,
one for each gas level (High, Mid, and Low) of each gas. If you use cylinders that
contain a blend of the NOX and the diluent gas, you should report at least three records,
one for each gas level (High, Mid, and Low) of the blend.
Appendix E Protocol Gas Data Elements
Gas Level Code
Element Name: GasLevelCode
Report a calibration gas level code of HIGH, MID, or LOW to indicate the concentration of the
gas in the cylinder. The definition of a high-level, mid-level, and low-level calibration gas can
be found in the Part 75 performance specifications for linearity checks and in EPA Reference
Method 7E for RATAs.
Gas Type Code
Element Name: GasTypeCode
Report one or more of the gas type codes in Table 9 of Section 2.3.4 to indicate the type(s) of
gas(es) in the cylinder.
Note: If you use a blend of EPA Protocol gases that is not present in this table, you may report a
value of "APPVD", but you will need to contact EPA before submitting the data in order to get
permission to use this code.
Cylinder Identifier
Element Name: Cylinderldentifier
Report the vendor-assigned identification or serial number found on the cylinder.
For purified air material, leave this field blank.
Vendor Identifier
Element Name: Vendor Identifier
For an EPA Protocol gas, report the EPA-assigned PGVP Vendor ID of the production site that
supplied the cylinder. PGVP Vendor IDs are year specific, therefore report the assigned PGVP
Vendor ID that is applicable on the date the cylinder is certified. An up-to-date list of PGVP
Vendor IDs will be located on the EPA website, and can be accessed via the ECMPS Support
website.
Report "NONPGVP" if the cylinder was purchased from a non-participating vendor prior to 60
days after the final rule is published in the FR.
Leave this field blank if the Gas Type Code is ZERO, AIR, SRM, NTRM, GMIS, RGM, or
PRM.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 136
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
3.1.6 Appendix E Protocol Gas Data
March 11, 2015
Expiration Date
Element Name: ExpirationDate
For an EPA Protocol gas, SRM, NTRM, GMIS, RGM, or PRM, report the cylinder's expiration
date.
Leave this field blank if the Gas Type Code is AIR or ZERO.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 137
-------
March 11, 2015
3.1.7 Appendix E Air Emission Testing Data
3.1.7 Appendix E Air Emission Testing Data
Figure 37
Appendix E Air Emission Testing Data XML Elements
Description of Data
Report at least one Air Emission Testing Data record for each Appendix E Test. One record
should be reported for each on-site Qualified Individual from an Air Emission Testing Body who
conducted or oversaw the test. The Qualified Individual must be qualified for the methods
employed in the test.
Appendix E Air Emission Testing Data Elements
QI Last Name
ElementName: QILastName
Report the last name of the on-site Qualified Individual who conducted or oversaw the test.
QI First Name
ElementName: QIFirstName
Report the first name of the on-site Qualified Individual who conducted or oversaw the test.
QI Middle Initial
ElementName: QIMiddlelnitial
Report the middle initial of the on-site Qualified Individual who conducted or oversaw the test.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 138
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
3.1.7 Appendix E Air Emission Testing Data
March 11, 2015
AETB Name
ElementName: AETBName
Report the name of the Air Emission Testing Body that performed the test.
AETB Phone Number
ElementName: AETBPhoneNumber
Report the phone number of the Air Emission Testing Body that performed the test. The number
should contain dashes and be formatted as 999-999-9999.
AETB Email
ElementName: AETBEmail
Report the email address of the Air Emission Testing Body that performed the test.
ExamDate
ElementName: ExamDate
Report the date that the on-site Qualified Individual took and passed the relevant qualification
exam(s) for the reference method(s) that were performed during the test.
Provider Name
ElementName: ProviderName
Report the name of the provider(s) of the qualification test that took place on the exam date.
Provider Email
ElementName: ProviderEmail
Report the email address of the provider(s) of the qualification test that took place on the exam
date.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 139
-------
March 11, 2015
3.2 Fuel Flowmeter Accuracy Test
3.2 Fuel Flowmeter Accuracy Test
Figure 38
Fuel Flowmeter Accuracy Test XML Structure
" ManHaring Sf stemlO
"Ci.riL.Lr - v!
" SpmScaleGcMlft
EndMovr
' EndMinulc
— ~GnGBR0riodlndicator
fiitlllCiiittlttfAtCiiflKffcM
Include ike Fuel Flowmeter
Accuracy Dal.» record for the
tested fuel flowmeter
component
'••MMboOCod*
gap ' i] ij
—I* wndfirtiAccuracy |
—|* HighFugi Accuracy
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 140
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
3.2 Fuel Flowmeter Accuracy Test
March 11, 2015
Description of Data
If the fuel flowmeter is calibrated with a flowing fluid, report fuel flowmeter accuracy test results
in a Fuel Flowmeter Accuracy Data record (i.e., if the flowmeter is calibrated in a
laboratory or by an in-line calibration against a reference flowmeter, or both). (See Sections
2.1.5.1 and 2.1.5.2 of Appendix D to Part 75.) The Fuel Flowmeter Accuracy Data record
must be submitted as a "child" of a Test Summary Data record. If the flowmeter is an orifice,
nozzle, or venturi-type that meets the design criteria of AGA Report No. 3, report the results of
the transmitter/transducer calibrations and primary element inspections using, respectively, the
Transmitter Transducer Data record and the Test Summary Data record for
Miscellaneous Tests.
Specific Considerations
Multi-Flowmeter Systems
• Report separate Fuel Flowmeter Accuracy tests for each installed flowmeter component
for fuel flowmeter systems with multiple flowmeter components (e.g., a system with a
main supply meter and a return meter, or a system consisting of multiple flowmeters
supplying the same type of fuel to a unit or to a group of low mass emissions (LME)
units).
Frequency of Testing
• Flowmeter accuracy tests are required once every four "fuel flowmeter QA operating
quarters," as defined in 40 CFR 72.2, with a maximum of 20 calendar quarters between
successive tests. However, the optional fuel flow-to-load ratio test in Section 2.1.7 of
Appendix D may be used to extend the interval between successive accuracy tests up to
20 calendar quarters, irrespective of the number of fuel flowmeter QA operating quarters
that have elapsed since the previous test.
• Do not report accuracy test results if the meter is temporarily put into storage after being
recalibrated (i.e., if the fuel flowmeter component is not active and is therefore not part of
the monitoring plan). A fuel flowmeter QA operating quarter is counted against a
flowmeter only when the meter has been re-installed, not if it is in storage (refer to the
Part 75 Emissions Monitoring Policy Manual).
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 141
-------
March 11, 2015
3.2.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Fuel Flowmeter Accuracy
3.2.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Fuel Flowmeter Accuracy
Use the following instructions for completing each element of the Test Summary Data section
for a fuel flowmeter accuracy test.
Unit ID or Stack Pipe ID
Element Name: UnitID or StackPipelD
Report the Unit ID or Stack Pipe ID that corresponds to the test location.
Test Type Code
Element Name: TestTypeCode
Report the test type code as "FFACC."
Monitoring System ID
Element Name: MonitoringSystemID
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to fuel flowmeter accuracy tests.
Component ID
Element Name: ComponentID
Report the three-character Component ID assigned to the fuel flowmeter.
Span Scale Code
Element Name: SpanScaleCode
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to fuel flowmeter accuracy tests.
Test Number
Element Name: TestNumber
At each monitoring location and for each test type, report a unique test number for each set of
records which comprises a single test. One method of tracking unique test numbers is to use the
Component ID as a prefix to the number. The test number may not be reused at this location for
another linearity check.
Test Reason Code
Element Name: TestReasonCode
Report the purpose of the test using the appropriate code from Table 31. If the test is both a
periodic quality assurance test and a recertification test, report that the test is a recertification
test. If the test is both a periodic quality assurance test and a diagnostic test, report that the test is
a periodic quality assurance test.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 142
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
3,2,1 Test Summary Data Elements for Fuel Flowmeter Accuracy
March 11,2015
Table 31
Fuel Flowmeter Accuracy Test Reason Codes and Descriptions
Code
Description
INITIAL
Initial Certification
DIAG
Diagnostic
QA
Periodic Quality Assurance
RECERT
Recertification
Test Description
Element Name; TestDescription
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to fuel flowmeter accuracy tests.
Test Result Code
Element Name; TestResnltCode
Report the appropriate code from Table 32 to indicate the result of the test.
Table 32
Fuel Flowmeter Accuracy Test Result Codes and Descriptions
Cade
Description
.ABORTED
Test was aborted due to problems with the installed monitoring
system (in-line tests at the affected facility, only).
FAILED
Test was failed.
PASSED
Test was passed.
Note that for in-line tests at the affected facility, the monitoring system is considered out-of-
control when a test is aborted due to a problem with a flowmeter. If aborted due to problems
with the process or with the reference flowmetei. do not report the test.
Begin Date
Element Name; BeginDate
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to fuel flowmeter accuracy tests.
Begin Hour
Element Name: BeginIIour
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to fuel flowmeter accuracy tests.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions — Page 143
-------
March 11, 2015
3.2.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Fuel Flowmeter Accuracy
Begin Minute
Element Name: BeginMinute
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to fuel flowmeter accuracy tests.
End Date
Element Name: EndDate
Report the date when the test was completed.
End Hour
Element Name: EndHour
Report the hour when the test was completed.
End Minute
Element Name: EndMinute
Report the minute when the test was completed.
Grace Period Indicator
Element Name: GracePeriodlndicator
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to fuel flowmeter accuracy tests.
Year
Element Name: Year
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to fuel flowmeter accuracy tests.
Quarter
Element Name: Quarter
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to fuel flowmeter accuracy tests.
Test Comment
Element Name: TestComment
Report a comment regarding the test if desired.
Injection Protocol Code
Element Name: InjectionProtocolCode
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to fuel flowmeter accuracy tests.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 144
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
3,2,2 Fuel Flowmeter Accuracy Data
March 11,2015
3.2.2 Fuel Flowmeter Accuracy Data
Figure 39
Fuel Flowmeter Accuracy Data XML Elements
Fuel Flowmeter Accuracy Data Elements
Use the following instructions for completing each element of the Full Flowmeter Accuracy
Data record.
Accuracy Test Method Code
Element Name: AccuracyTestMethodCode
Report the type of test using the uppercase codes in Table 33.
Table 33
Accuracy Test Method Codes and Descriptions
Cede
Description
AGA7
AGA Report No. 7, Measurement of Natural Gas by Turbine Meter
API
American Petroleum Instituted Method Listed in Appendix D. Section 2.1.5.1
ASME
For an ASME Method Listed in Appendix D, Section 2.1.5.1
ILMMF
In-line (on-site) Comparison Against a Master Mela- — at Facility
ISO
International Organization for Standardization Method Listed m Appendix D.
Section 2.1.5.1
LC1M
laboratory Comparison Against a Reference Meter
NIST
NIST-Traceable Method. Approved by Petition Under "5.66
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions — Page 145
-------
March 11, 2015
3.2.2 Fuel Flowmeter Accuracy Data
Low Fuel Accuracy
Element Name: LowFuelAccuracy
Report the accuracy as a percentage of upper range value, using Equation D-l of Appendix D.
If accuracy testing is done at two or more low-range fuel flow rates, report the highest accuracy
from all of the low-level test results in this field and do not report the other low-level results.
Round to one decimal place.
For aborted tests, leave this field blank.
Mid Fuel Accuracy
Element Name: MidFuelAccuracy
Report the accuracy as a percentage of upper range value, using Equation D-l of Appendix D.
If accuracy testing is done at two or more mid-range fuel flow rates, report the highest accuracy
from all of the mid-level test results in this field and do not report the other mid-level results.
Round to one decimal place.
For aborted tests, leave this field blank.
High Fuel Accuracy
Element Name: HighFuelAccuracy
Report the accuracy as a percentage of upper range value, using Equation D-l of Appendix D.
If accuracy testing is done at two or more high-range fuel flow rates, report the highest accuracy
from all of the high-level test results in this field and do not report the other high-level results.
Round to one decimal place.
For aborted tests, leave this field blank.
Reinstallation Date
Element Name: ReinstallationDate
For laboratory calibrations that were not performed in-line at the facility, report the date that the
fuel flowmeter was reinstalled.
For in-line tests, leave this field blank.
Reinstallation Hour
Element Name: ReinstallationHour
Report the hour that the fuel flowmeter was reinstalled.
For in-line tests, leave this field blank.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 146
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
3.3 Transmitter Transducer Test
March 11, 2015
3.3 Transmitter Transducer Test
Figure 40
Transmitter Transducer Accuracy Test XML Structure
TMrtSamfnaiyDHtai
* ItoottorinpSyte n>K) |
—|g_——__1
' SpmScileeotfi'
1
'T#*ID««Cflpioili
'T«HtHMUltCeKHl
BegsnDate
'tagMkar
Endhkrtirt*
*Gi*»P«ri«aniJScator
iilMflonProtowiBoiip
—piovAtvt)Accof»cy]
—^LgwL
-------
March 11, 2015
3.3 Transmitter Transducer Test
Description of Data
For orifice, nozzle, and venturi-type fuel flowmeters, that conform to AGA Report No.3, the
owner or operator may opt to certify the meters by calibrating the transmitters (or transducers)
using NIST-traceable equipment and performing a visual inspection of the primary element, in
lieu of calibrating the meters with a flowing fluid. If this option is chosen, use a Test Summary
Data record and the Transmitter Transducer Data record, to report the results of the
transmitter or transducer accuracy tests, performed according to Section 2.1.6.1 of Appendix D
to Part 75.
Specific Considerations
Frequency of Testing
• Transmitter/transducer accuracy tests are required once every four "fuel flowmeter QA
operating quarters" (as defined in §72.2 of Part 75) with a maximum of 20 calendar
quarters between successive tests. However, the optional fuel flow-to-load ratio test in
Section 2.1.7 of Appendix D may be used to extend the interval between successive
accuracy tests up to 20 calendar quarters, irrespective of the number of fuel flowmeter
QA operating quarters that have elapsed since the previous test. Submit one
Transmitter Transducer Data record for each transmitter or transducer accuracy test
performed.
• For a combined cycle combustion turbine (CT) with a duct burner (DB), if the same fuel
is combusted in both the turbine and the duct burner, show the CT and DB fuel
flowmeters as separate components of the same monitoring system. In this case, both
flowmeters must be up-to-date on their required QA tests to maintain an "in-control" QA
status for the system. The interval between the required QA tests is determined in the
same way for both components. The number of hours that the fuel is combusted during
the quarter determines whether a "QA quarter" is counted against a particular flowmeter,
not the number of hours that the flowmeter is used.
Example: A combined cycle turbine with a duct burner combusts only natural gas. In the third-
quarter of 2007, natural gas is combusted for 250 hours in the unit. The duct burner operates
only for 50 hours. In this case, since natural gas was combusted in the unit for >168 hours, a
fuel flowmeter QA operating quarter is counted against both the CT and DB flowmeters, even
though the DB flowmeter was used for only 50 hours.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 148
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
3.3.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Transmitter Transducer Test
March 11, 2015
3.3.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Transmitter Transducer Test
Use the following instructions for completing each element of the Test Summary Data section
for transmitter transducer tests.
Unit ID or Stack Pipe ID
Element Name: UnitID or StackPipelD
Report the Unit ID or Stack Pipe ID that corresponds to the test location.
Test Type Code
Element Name: TestTypeCode
Report the test type code as "FFACCTT."
Monitoring System ID
Element Name: MonitoringSystemID
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to transmitter transducer tests.
Component ID
Element Name: ComponentID
Report the three-character Component ID assigned to the fuel flowmeter.
Span Scale Code
Element Name: SpanScaleCode
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to transmitter transducer tests.
Test Number
Element Name: TestNumber
At each monitoring location and for each test type, report a unique test number for each set of
records which comprises a single test. One method of tracking unique test numbers is to use the
Component ID as a prefix to the number. The test number may not be reused at this location for
another transmitter transducer test.
Test Reason Code
Element Name: TestReasonCode
Report the purpose of the test using the appropriate code from Table 34. If the test is both a
periodic quality assurance test and a recertification test, report that the test is a recertification
test. If the test is both a periodic quality assurance test and a diagnostic test, report that the test is
a periodic quality assurance test.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 149
-------
March IL 2015
3,3,1 Test Summary Data Elements for Transmitter Transducer Test
Table 34
Transmitter Transducer Test Reason Codes and Descriptions
{
-------
3.3.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Transmitter Transducer Test
March 11, 2015
Begin Minute
Element Name: BeginMinute
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to transmitter transducer tests.
End Date
Element Name: EndDate
Report the date when the test was completed.
End Hour
Element Name: EndHour
Report the hour when the test was completed.
End Minute
Element Name: EndMinute
Report the minute when the test was completed.
Grace Period Indicator
Element Name: GracePeriodlndicator
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to transmitter transducer tests.
Year
Element Name: Year
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to transmitter transducer tests.
Quarter
Element Name: Quarter
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to transmitter transducer tests.
Test Comment
Element Name: TestComment
Report a comment regarding the test if desired.
Injection Protocol Code
Element Name: InjectionProtocolCode
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to transmitter transducer tests
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 151
-------
March 11, 2015
3.3.2 Transmitter Transducer Data
3.3.2 Transmitter Transducer Data
Figure 41
Transmitter Transducer Data XML Elements
Transmitter Transducer Data Elements
Instructions for completing each element of the Transmitter Transducer Data record are
provided below.
Low Level Accuracy
Element Name: LowLevelAccuracy
Report one of the following: (1) the highest accuracy percentage for any of the three
transmitters, obtained using Equation D-la of Appendix D; (2) the total fuel flowmeter accuracy
percentage, as determined using AGA Report No. 3 Uncertainty Guidelines; or (3) the sum of the
percent accuracies of the three transmitters. Round to one decimal place.
Low Level Accuracy Spec Code
Element Name: LowLevelAccuracySpecCode
Report the method used to determine accuracy results for this level using one of the codes from
Table 36.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 152
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
3.3.2 Transmitter Transducer Data
March 11,2015
Table 36
Accuracy Spec Codes and Descriptions
Code
Description
ACI
Actual Highest Accuracy Percentage for Individual Transmitter or Transducer
at This Level (must be < 1.0 percent of full scale to pass)
AGA3
Total Flowmeter Accuracy From AGA Report No. 3 Uncertainty Guidelines
(must be < 2.0 percent of upper range value to pass)
SUM
Sum of the Percentage Accuracies of All Transmitters or Transducers at This
Level (must be ^ 4.0 peicent to pass)
Mid Level Accuracy
Element Name: MidLevelAccuracv
Report one of the following: (1) the highest percentage accuracy of any of the three transmitters,
obtained using Equation D-la of Appendix D: (2) the sum of the accuracy percentages of the
three transmitters; or (3) the total fuel flowmeter accuracy percentage, as determined using AGA
Report No. 3 Uncertainty Guidelines. If accuracy testing is done at two or more mid-level
points, then, for Option 1. report the highest individual accuracy percentage value from all of the
mid-level tests of all three transmitters. If Option 2 is used, first determine the highest accuracy
percentage for each of the three transmitters at all mid-level points tested. Then, take the sum of
these three highest accuracy percentages. Round to one decimal place.
Mid Level Accuracy Spec Code
Element Name: MidLevelAccuracySpecCode
Report the method used to determine accuracy results for this level using one of the codes from
Table 35.
High Level Accuracy
Element Name: HighLevelAccttracy
Report one of the follow ing: (1) the highest percentage accuracy for any of the three
transmitters, obtained using Equation D-la of Appendix D; (2) the sum of the accuracy
percentages of the three transmitters; or (3) the total fuel flowmeter accuracy percentage, as
determined using AGA Report No. 3 Uncertainty Guidelines. Round to one decimal place.
High Level Accuracy Spec Code
Element Name: HighLe\'elAcciiracySpecCode
Report the method used to determine accuracy results for this level using one of the codes from
Table 35.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions — Page 153
-------
March 11, 2015
3.4 Fuel Flow-to-Load Baseline
3.4 Fuel Flow-To-Load Baseline
Figure 42
Fuel Flow-to-Load Baseline XML Structure
— ~Compon«MD
StackPipcrtO
?TeaiT^p«Code]
' MttBlerlBflf stem® j
'SpM&saieCsde
'TMriHumbar
TnMiuonCoili |
'EndftKmite
GracaPenocHndicilor
TavtConumirt
'ifljBiaiQnProlDcpKptte
J
-ftecuficrfi
PufinwTolsiattsiiintittt
--fPErf*>tllyiwB«r |
—{* Ave r«flef»eiFicwa»ie]
—{*RMffimtrt^Zpadt»'l«CoS"
—{*Ay«r«a«HO>;rtyHg
-------
3.4 Fuel Flow-to-LoadBaseline
March 11, 2015
Description of Data
If you elect to use the optional fuel flow-to-load ratio test provisions of Section 2.1.7 of
Appendix D to Part 75 to extend the deadline for required fuel flowmeter accuracy tests, report a
Test Summary Data record and its corresponding Fuel Flow-to-Load Baseline Data
record for each fuel flowmeter system that will be quality-assured using fuel flow-to-load ratio or
gross heat rate (GHR) methodology, upon completion of the baseline data collection. According
to the provisions of Section 2.1.7.1, the baseline fuel flow-to-load ratio or GHR must be
supported by at least 168 hours of baseline fuel flow-to-load ratio or gross heat rate (GHR) data.
Specific Considerations
Reporting Baseline Data
• For orifice, nozzle, and venturi fuel flowmeters relying on conformance with AGA
Report No. 3 for certification and QA, baseline data collection begins immediately after
completing the full quality assurance sequence (i.e., flowmeter transmitter/transducer
calibration test and primary element inspection (PEI)). The transmitter calibrations and
PEI must either be completed in the same calendar quarter or in the adjacent quarters.
• For flowmeters that do not require a PEI, if the calibration occurs on-site, baseline data
collection begins immediately after completing the accuracy test. If the calibration
occurs off-site, baseline data collection begins immediately after the flowmeter is
reinstalled.
• The baseline data must be generated within four calendar quarters.
• For common pipe configurations, a single baseline fuel flow-to-load ratio or GHR is
derived from the average common pipe fuel flow rate and the hourly loads for all units
that received fuel from the common pipe. Thus, report only one Fuel Flow-to-Load
Baseline Data record for the common pipe (see Part 75, Appendix D, Section
2.1.7.1(b)).
• For units that co-fire fuels as the principal mode of operation, use the GHR methodology
and derive the baseline data during co-fired hours (see Part 75, Appendix D, Section
2.1.7.1(e)). Report a Test Summary Data record for each fuel flowmeter system that
supplies fuel to the unit during co-fired hours. In the associated Fuel Flow-to-Load
Baseline Data records for these systems, report the identical co-fired baseline
information.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 155
-------
March 11, 2015
3.4.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Fuel Flow-to-Load Baseline
3.4.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Fuel Flow-to-Load Baseline
Use the following instructions for completing each element of the Test Summary Data section
for Fuel Flow-to-Load Baseline Data.
Unit ID or Stack Pipe ID
Element Name: UnitID or StackPipelD
Report the Unit ID or Stack Pipe ID that corresponds to the test location.
Test Type Code
Element Name: TestTypeCode
Report the test type code as "FF2LBAS."
Monitoring System ID
Element Name: MonitoringSystemID
Report the fuel flowmeter System ID.
Component ID
Element Name: ComponentID
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to Fuel Flow-to-Load Baseline Data.
Span Scale Code
Element Name: SpanScaleCode
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to Fuel Flow-to-Load Baseline Data.
Test Number
Element Name: TestNumber
At each monitoring location and for each test type, report a unique test number for each set of
records which comprises a single test. The test number may not be reused at this location for
another set of Fuel Flow-to-Load Baseline Data.
Test Reason Code
Element Name: TestReasonCode
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to Fuel Flow-to-Load Baseline Data.
Test Description
Element Name: TestDescription
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to Fuel Flow-to-Load Baseline Data.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 156
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
3.4.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Fuel Flow-to-Load Baseline
March 11, 2015
Test Result Code
Element Name: TestResultCode
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to Fuel Flow-To-Load Baseline Data.
Begin Date
Element Name: BeginDate
Report the date when the Fuel Flow-to-Load Baseline Data collection was begun. This will
be immediately after the completion of the fuel flowmeter accuracy test(s) (for on-site accuracy
tests) or immediately after the flowmeter is reinstalled (for off-site calibrations).
Begin Hour
Element Name: BeginHour
Report the hour when the Fuel Flow-to-Load Baseline Data collection was begun.
Begin Minute
Element Name: BeginMinute
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to Fuel Flow-to-Load Baseline Data.
End Date
Element Name: EndDate
Report the date when the Fuel Flow-to-Load Baseline Data collection was completed.
End Hour
Element Name: EndHour
Report the hour when the Fuel Flow-to-Load Baseline Data collection was completed.
End Minute
Element Name: EndMinute
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to Fuel Flow-to-Load Baseline Data.
Grace Period Indicator
Element Name: GracePeriodlndicator
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to Fuel Flow-to-Load Baseline Data.
Year
Element Name: Year
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to Fuel Flow-to-Load Baseline Data.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 157
-------
March 11, 2015
3.4.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Fuel Flow-to-Load Baseline
Quarter
Element Name: Quarter
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to Fuel Flow-to-Load Baseline Data.
Test Comment
Element Name: TestComment
Report a comment regarding the Fuel Flow-to-Load Baseline Data if desired.
Injection Protocol Code
Element Name: InjectionProtocolCode
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to Fuel Flow-to-Load Baseline Data.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 158
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
3.4.2 Fuel Flow-to-Load Baseline Data
March 11, 2015
3.4.2 Fuel Flow-to-Load Baseline Data
Figure 43
Fuel Flow-to-Load Baseline Data XML Elements
Fuel Flow-to-Load Baseline Data Elements
Instructions for completing each element of the Fuel Flow-to-Load Baseline Data record are
provided below.
Accuracy Test Number
Element Name: AccuracyTestNumber
For orifice, nozzle, and venturi fuel flowmeters required to perform a transmitter accuracy test as
periodic quality assurance (under Section 2.1.6 of Appendix D), report the test number of the
most recent transmitter accuracy test (according to Sections 2.1.6.1 through 2.1.6.5 of Appendix
D). For all other fuel flowmeters, report the test number of the most recent flowmeter system
accuracy test (according to Section 2.1.5.1 or 2.1.5.2 of Appendix D).
Primary Element Inspection (PEI) Test Number
Element Name: PEITestNumber
For orifice, nozzle, or venturi fuel flowmeters required to perform a visual inspection of the
primary element as periodic quality assurance (under Section 2.1.6.4 of Appendix D), report the
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 159
-------
March 11, 2015
3.4.2 Fuel Flow-to-Load Baseline Data
test number of the most recent primary element inspection. For all other types of fuel
flowmeters, leave this field blank.
Average Fuel Flow Rate
Element Name: AverageFuelFlowRate
Report the hourly average fuel flow rate during unit operation measured by the fuel flowmeter
system during the baseline period (i.e., Qbase from Equation D-lb in Section 2.1.7.1 of Appendix
D). If you elect to use the gross heat rate (GHR) option and report the average hourly heat input
rate, leave this field as blank.
For a system with more than one fuel flowmeter, you must determine the net hourly fuel flow
rate for each hour in the baseline data collection period. The net fuel flow rate may represent the
difference between the values measured for the main supply and recirculating fuel lines, or may
represent the sum of fuel flow for two or more fuel flowmeters measuring the same type of fuel
to the unit. For a combined cycle turbine with auxiliary firing (e.g., a duct burner), if the duct
burner operates infrequently (i.e., < 25 percent of the unit operating hours, on average), you may
establish the baseline for the fuel flowmeter system using the hours when only the combustion
turbine is in operation. Add together all of the net hourly fuel flow rates and divide by the
number of hours in the baseline data collection period to obtain Qbase-
Average Load
Element Name: AverageLoad
Report the average unit load during the baseline period (i.e., Lavg from Equation D-lc in Section
2.1.7.1 of Appendix D). For a common pipe, add together all of the hourly operating loads for
all units that received fuel through the common pipe header during the baseline data collection
period. Divide the result by the number of hours in the baseline data collection period to obtain
Lavg. For a combined cycle turbine with auxiliary firing, if the duct burner operates infrequently
(< 25 percent of the unit operating hours, on average) and you may establish the baseline using
hours when only the turbine is in operation, use the corresponding hourly electrical outputs from
the turbine to determine Lavg.
Baseline Fuel Flow-to-Load Ratio
Element Name: BaselineFuelFlow ToLoadRatio
Report the baseline fuel flow-to-load ratio calculated as Rbase from Equation D-lb in Section
2.1.7.1 of Appendix D. If you report the Baseline GHR, you may leave this field blank.
Fuel Flow-to-Load Units of Measure (UOM) Code
Element Name: FuelFlow ToLoadUOMCode
Report the code for the units of measure of the baseline fuel-flow-to-load ratio as shown in Table
37. If the Baseline Fuel Flow-to-load Ratio data element is blank, leave this field blank.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 160
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
3.4.2 Fuel Flow-to-Load Baseline Data
March 11, 2015
Table 37
Base Fuel Flow-to-Load Units of Measure Codes and Descriptions
Applicability
C®ie
Description
Gas Combustion
1
100 sefli/MWe
2
100 scfh/klh per hour of steam load
7
100 scfh'nmiBtu per hour of steam load
Oil Combustion
3
lib lir) MWe
4
(lb lu Kklb per hot® steam load
8
(lb/hr)/iiimBtu per hour of steain load
Subpart H units not subject to either the
Acid Rain Program or the CASPR SO?
Program, and u&iug volumetric oil
flowmeters
5
(gal/lit)/MWe
6
(gal/hr)/klb per hour of steam load
9
1 gal/hr) nmiBtu per hour of steam load
Average Hourly Heat Input Rale
Element Name; AverageHourlyHeatlnputRate
Report the average heat input rate for the baseline hours in inmBtii/lir. If you report the Average
Fuel Flow Rate, you may leave this field blank.
Baseline Gross Heat Rate (GHR)
Element Name: BaseHmGHR
Report the baseline value of the gross heat rate calculated as (GHR)t,ase from Equation D-1C in
Section 2,1.7.1 of Appendix D. If you provide the baseline fuel flow-to-load ratio, you may
leave this field blank.
GHR Units of Measure Code
Element Name: GHRUnitsOfMeasureCode
Report the code for the units of the baseline GHR as shown in Table 38. If the Baseline GHR
data element is blank also leave this field blank.
Table 38
Baseline GHE Units of Measure Codes and Descriptions
("ode
!)t si i iption
BTUKWH
Btu/kwh
BI'ULB
Btii/lb of steam load
BTUKBTU
mniBtu per miiiBto of steam load times 1000
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions — Page 161
-------
March 11, 2015
3.4.2 Fuel Flow-to-Load Baseline Data
Number of Hours Excluded Co-firing
Element Name: NumberOJHoursExcludedCofiring
If single-fuel combustion is the principal mode of operation, report the number of hours (if any)
of fuel flow rate data excluded from the fuel flow-to-load or GHR analysis because the unit was
co-firing different fuels. If co-firing is the principal mode of operation, report the number of
single-fuel hours (if any) excluded from the data analysis. Leave this field as blank or zero if
you are not claiming any excluded hours for this reason.
Number of Hours Excluded Ramping
Element Name: NumberOJHoursExcludedRamping
Report the number of hours from the baseline period that are excluded from the baseline data
because they met the criteria of ramping hours in Section 2.1.7.1 of Appendix D. Leave this
field as blank or zero if you are not claiming any excluded hours for this reason.
Number of Hours Excluded Low Range
Element Name: NumberOJHoursExcludedLowRange
Report the number of hours from the baseline period that were excluded from the baseline data
because the unit load during the hour was in the lower 25.0 percent of the range of operation and
was not considered normal. Leave this field as blank or zero if you are not claiming any
excluded hours for this reason.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 162
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
3.5 Fuel Flow-to-Load Test
March 11, 2015
3.5 Fuel Flow-to-Load Test
Figure 44
Fuel Flow-to-Load Test XML Structure
—f Te»tRe*u»tCo(te i
Ukmlionng Syste mID I
'
SpanScolcCode
*T««
— gTa«tComwent |
— "injactionProfciicaBoia |
-|rA^8y»t>.Wer»r>ce"|
—f'tiiimlxrOfWguraUietl [
—|*lfaimtwrOfHour«gxc>uctedR«mp)nir]
—fWmnbofOfHoursExctudedLowRiiri
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 163
-------
March 11, 2015
3.5 Fuel Flow-to-Load Test
Description of Data
For units using the optional fuel flowmeter quality assurance provisions of Section 2.1.7 of
Appendix D to Part 75 (i.e., the fuel flow-to-load ratio or GHR test) to extend the deadline for
fuel flowmeter accuracy and transmitter/transducer tests, you may extend the QA deadline by
one quarter by reporting one fuel flow-to-load test per fuel flowmeter system. Report the flow-
to-load test results in a Test Summary Data record and the details of the flow-to-load analysis
in an associated Fuel Flow-to-Load Test record.
Report this test every operating quarter, starting with either:
• The first operating quarter following the quarter in which all the required fuel flowmeter
accuracy tests, transmitter/transducer accuracy tests, and primary element inspections are
completed for flowmeters that are calibrated on-site; or
• The first operating quarter following the quarter that the flowmeter was reinstalled for
flowmeters that are calibrated off-site.
If baseline data collection is still in progress at the end of the quarter, report a test result of
"INPROG" in the Test Summary record and do not report a Fuel Flow-to-Load Test record.
Specific Considerations
Submitting for a Combined-Cycle Combustion Turbine (CT)
• For a combined-cycle combustion turbine (CT) with a duct burner, if the fuel flowmeters
serving the CT and the duct burner are represented as components of a single fuel
flowmeter monitoring system, the fuel flow-to-load ratio test may be performed using
only the turbine fuel flow rate and load, provided that the duct burner is used, on average,
for < 25 percent of the unit operating hours.
• For units that co-fire fuels as the principal mode of operation, use the GHR methodology
and use only co-fired hours in the data analysis (see Part 75, Appendix D, Section
2.1.7.2(d)(2)). Report a Test Summary Data record for each fuel flowmeter system
that supplies fuel to the unit during co-fired hours. In the associated Fuel Flow-to-
Load Test records for these systems, report the identical information from the co-fired
data analysis.
Reporting Frequency
• Do not report this record for non-operating quarters (i.e., quarters with zero operating
hours).
• For ozone season only reporters, fuel flow-to-load ratio tests are required only during the
ozone season. Therefore, for such units or pipes, report a Fuel Flow-to-Load Test
Data record only for the second and third calendar quarters, if those quarters are
operating quarters (see §75.74(c)(3)(v)).
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 164
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
3.5.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Fuel Flow-to-Load Test
March 11, 2015
3.5.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Fuel-Flow-to-Load Test
Use the following instructions for completing each element of the Test Summary Data section
for the fuel flow-to-load test.
Unit ID or Stack Pipe ID
Element Name: UnitID or StackPipelD
Report the Unit ID or Stack Pipe ID that corresponds to the test location.
Test Type Code
Element Name: TestTypeCode
Report the test type code as "FF2LTST."
Monitoring System ID
Element Name: MonitoringSystemID
Report the three-character Monitoring System ID assigned to the fuel flowmeter system.
Component ID
Element Name: ComponentID
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to fuel flow-to-load tests.
Span Scale Code
Element Name: SpanScaleCode
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to fuel flow-to-load tests.
Test Number
Element Name: TestNumber
At each monitoring location and for each test type, report a unique test number for each set of
records which comprises a single test. One method of tracking unique test numbers for this type
of test is to use the System ID as a prefix to the number. The test number may not be reused at
this location for another fuel flow-to-load test.
Test Reason Code
Element Name: TestReasonCode
In all cases, report "QA" as the purpose of the test.
Test Description
Element Name: TestDescription
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to fuel flow-to-load tests.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 165
-------
March II, 2015
3,5,1 Test Summary Data Elements for Fuel Flow-to-Load Test
Test Result Code
Element Name: TestResultCode
Report the appropriate code from Table 39 below to indicate the result of the test.
Table 39
Fuel Flow-to-Load Test Result Codes and Descriptions
rvuip
Desu iptiou
EXC168H
Fewer tiian 168 hours available to analyze after taking allowable data exclusions.
FAILED
Test was failed.
FEWI68H
Fewer than 168 fuel operating hours (i.e., not a fuel flowmeter QA operating
quarter).
INPROG
Baseline data collection in progress at the end of the quarter.
PASSED
Test was passed.
Begin Date
Element Name; BeginDate
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to fuel flow-to-load tests.
Begin Hour
Element Name: BeginHour
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to fuel flow-to-load tests.
Begin Minute
Element Name: BegmMirmte
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to fuel flow-to-load tests.
End Date
Element Name: EndDate
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to fuel flow-to-load tests.
End Hour
Element Name: EndHour
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to fuel flow-to-load tests.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions — Page 166
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
3.5.1 Test Summary Data Elements for Fuel Flow-to-Load Test
March 11, 2015
End Minute
Element Name: EndMinute
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to fuel flow-to-load tests.
Grace Period Indicator
Element Name: GracePeriodlndicator
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to fuel flow-to-load tests.
Year
Element Name: Year
Report the year (YYYY) of the calendar quarter of data that is being quality-assured.
Quarter
Element Name: Quarter
Report the calendar quarter (Q) of the calendar quarter of the data that is being quality-assured.
Test Comment
Element Name: TestComment
Report a comment regarding the test if desired.
Injection Protocol Code
Element Name: InjectionProtocolCode
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to fuel flow-to-load tests.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 167
-------
March 11, 2015
3.5.2 Fuel Flow-to-Load Test Data
3.5.2 Fuel Flow-to-Load Test Data
Figure 45
Fuel Flow-to-Load Test Data XML Elements
Fuel Flow-To-Load Test Data Elements
Use the following instructions for completing each element of the Fuel Flow-to-Load Test
Data section.
Test Basis Code
Element Name: TestBasisCode
Report a "Q" if the quarterly analysis compares the hourly fuel flow-to-load ratios (using
Equation D-le in Section 2.1.7.2 of Appendix D). Report an "H" if the quarterly analysis
compares the hourly gross heat rates (using Equation D-lf in Section 2.1.7.2 of Appendix D).
Leave this field blank if reporting a Test Result Code of "EXC168H" or "FEW168H" in the Test
Summary Data record.
Average Difference
Element Name: AverageDifference
Perform the quarterly analysis according to the provisions of Section 2.1.7.2 of Appendix D. If
168 hours of data are available, calculate and report the value of Ef using Equation D-lg.
In the quarter in which the baseline data collection is completed, there must be at least 168 hours
of data subsequent to completing baseline data collection in order to perform a fuel flow-to-load
or GHR test for that quarter.
Leave this field blank if reporting a Test Result Code of "EXC168H" or "FEW168H" in the Test
Summary Data record.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 168
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
3.5.2 Fuel Flow-to-Load Test Data
March 11, 2015
Number of Hours Used
Element Name: NumberOfHoursUsed
Report the number of hours of quality-assured fuel flow rate data that were used for the fuel
flow-to-load or GHR evaluation of the fuel flowmeter system. A minimum of 168 hours of
quality-assured fuel flow rate data are required for the analysis.
Leave this field blank if reporting a Test Result Code of "EXC168H" in the Test Summary
Data record.
Number of Hours Excluded Co-firing
Element Name: NumberOfHoursExcludedCofiring
Report the number of hours (if any) of fuel flow rate data excluded from the fuel flow-to-load or
GHR analysis because the unit was co-firing different fuels, if single-fuel combustion is the
principal mode of operation. Report the number of single-fuel hours (if any) excluded from the
data analysis, if co-firing is the principal mode of operation.
Leave this field as blank if not claiming any excluded hours for this reason.
Number of Hours Excluded Ramping
Element Name: NumberOfHoursExcludedRamping
Report the number of hours (if any) of fuel flow rate data excluded from the data analysis
because of ramping (i.e., the hourly load differed by more than +/- 15 percent from the load
during either the hour before or the hour after).
Leave this field as blank if not claiming any excluded hours for this reason.
Number of Hours Excluded Low Range
Element Name: NumberOfHoursExcludedLowRange
Report the number of hours (if any) of fuel flow rate data excluded from the data analysis
because the unit load was in the lower 25.0 percent of the range of operation (from minimum
safe, stable load to maximum sustainable load, as indicated in the Monitoring Load Data
record in the monitoring plan). This exclusion is not allowed if operation in this lower portion of
the range is considered normal for the unit.
Leave this field as blank if not claiming any excluded hours for this reason.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 169
-------
March 11, 2015
3.6 Unit Default Test (LME)
3.6 Unit Default Test (LME)
Figure 46
Unit Default Test XML Structure
i.»
Include •
record for each ran of the
fiictandkittit ssjxeific MO,
eaiiisiett rale lest
A four fail tcsl will require
4i least 12 run record* (3
raws per toad)
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 170
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
3.6 Unit Default Test (LME)
March 11, 2015
Description of Data
To establish a unit-specific, fuel-specific NOx emission rate for qualifying low mass emissions
(LME) units under the Acid Rain Program or Subpart H, perform Appendix E testing at each of the
required load levels, as described in §75.19 (c)(l)(iv)(A), (I) and (J). Report fuel-and-unit specific
NOx emission rate tests using a Test Summary Data record, a Unit Default Test Data record,
and Unit Default Test Run Data records for each run at each operating level of the test.
Indicate each test run used to calculate the highest three-run average NOx emission rate, by
reporting "0" for "no" or "1" for "yes" in the Run Used Flag data element of the appropriate UNIT
Default Test Run Data records. Report only three records with this indicator; for all other
records leave this field blank.
Specific Considerations
Aborted or Invalid Tests
• If a test is aborted or if certain test runs are discarded as invalid, keep a record of this in the
test log, but do not report partial tests or invalid runs in the Unit Default Test Run Data
record. The only acceptable reasons for aborting a test or discarding test runs are: (1) the
reference test method was not used properly or malfunctioned; or (2) a problem with the
unit or process prevented the test from being done at the load level or conditions specified
in the regulation.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 171
-------
March 11, 2015
3.6.1 Test Summary Data Elements for LME Unit Default Test
3.6.1 Test Summary Data Elements for LME Unit Default Test
Use the following instructions for completing each element of the Test Summary Data section
for the LME unit default test.
Unit ID or Stack Pipe ID
Element Name: UnitID or StackPipelD
Report the Unit ID that corresponds to the test location.
Test Type Code
Element Name: TestTypeCode
Report the test type code as "UNITDEF."
Monitoring System ID
Element Name: MonitoringSystemID
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to LME unit default tests.
Component ID
Element Name: ComponentID
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to LME unit default tests.
Span Scale Code
Element Name: SpanScaleCode
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to LME unit default tests.
Test Number
Element Name: TestNumber
At each monitoring location and for each test type, report a unique test number for each set of
records which comprises a single test. The test number may not be reused at this location for
another LME unit default test.
Test Reason Code
Element Name: TestReasonCode
Report the purpose of the test using the appropriate code from Table 40.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 172
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
3.6.1 Test Summary Data Elements for LME Unit Default Test
March 11,2015
Table 40
LME Unit Default Test Reason Codes and Descriptions
Code
Description
INITIAL.
Initial Unit Default Test
QA
Periodic Quality Assurance (every five years)
RECERT
Retest due to event reported in the QA Certification Event record
Test Description
Element Name; TestDescription
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to LME unit default tests.
Test Result Code
Element Name; TestResultCode
Leave this field Hank. It does not apply to LME. unit default tests.
Begin Date
Element Name; BeginDate
Report the begin date of the first run of the test.
Begin Hour
Element Name: BeginHour
Report the begin hour of the first run of the test.
Begin Minute
Element Name: BeginMinute
Report the begin minute of the first run of the test.
End Date
Element Name: EndDate
Report the end date of the last run of the test.
End Hour
Element Name; EvdHour
Report the end hour of the last run of the test.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions — Page 173
-------
March 11, 2015
3.6.1 Test Summary Data Elements for LME Unit Default Test
End Minute
Element Name: EndMinute
Report the end minute of the last run of the test.
Grace Period Indicator
Element Name: GracePeriodlndicator
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to LME unit default tests.
Year
Element Name: Year
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to LME unit default tests.
Quarter
Element Name: Quarter
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to LME unit default tests.
Test Comment
Element Name: TestComment
Report any comments regarding the test. Additionally, for tests conducted after January 1, 2009,
EPA encourages use of this field to report the name of the stack testing company, the lead tester,
and whether testing was conducted in accordance with ASTM D7036.
Injection Protocol Code
Element Name: InjectionProtocolCode
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to LME unit default tests.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 174
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
3.6.2 Unit Default Test Data
March 11,2015
3.6.2 Unit Default Test Data
Figure 47
Unit Default Test Data XML Elements
o,.®
Fuel Code
Element Name: Fuel Code
Report the type of fuel combusted during this unit default test using the appropriate uppercase code
as shown in Table 41.
Table 41
Fuel Codes and Descriptions for Unit Default Tests
WUfIC
Description
BFG
Blast Furnace Gas
BUT
Butane Gas
CDG
Coal-Derived Gas
COG
Coke Oven Gas
DGG
Digester Gas
DSI.
Diesel Oil
LFG
Landfill Gas
LPG
Liquefied Petroleum Gas (if measured as a gas)
MIX
Mixture (co-fired fuels)
NNG
Other Natural Gas (not PNG quality)
(ccmt )
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions — Page 175
-------
March IL 2015
3,6.2 Unit Default Test Data
Table 41
Fuel Codes and Descriptions for Unit Default Tests (cont.)
< <>(h-
hi'Miipiion
OGS
Other Gas
OIL.
Residual Oil
OOL
Other Oil
PDG
Producer Gas
PNG
Pipeline Natural Gas (as defined in §72.2)
PRG
Process Gas
PIP
Propane Gas
RPG
Refinery Gas
SRG
Unrefined Sour Gas
NOi Default Rate
Element Name: NOxDefauitRate
Report the default NOx emission rate for the LME unit as the highest three-run average obtained at
any tested load.
Operating C ondition Code
Element Name: OperatmgConditionCode
For units using separate base and peak load NO* default rates (see §75.19(c )(l)(iv)(C)(9)), report
the code from Table 42 indicating whether the test was performed at base load or peak load and, if
at base load, whether an additional test was performed at peak load. Leave this field Wank if not
reporting separate base and peak load NO* default rates. Report "E" if the unit burned an
emergency or ignition fuel during the hour and you do not have a separate correlation curve for the
fuel. For these hours, report the foel-specific maximum potential NOx emission rate (MER) in the
ParameterValueForFuel field.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions — Page 176
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
3.6.2 Unit Default Test Data
March 11,2015
Table 42
Unit Default Test Operating Condition Codes and Descriptions
Code
Description
A
This test was performed at base load and the resulting NO, default rate will be
multiplied by 1.15 to determine the NO* default rate for peak hours.
B
This test was performed at base load and an additional test was performed at
peak load.
P
This test was performed at peak load.
E
Emergency or Ignition Fuel
Group ID
Element Name: GronpID
If this test was performed for application to a group of identical units, use the same group II) as
reported in the Monitoring Default Data record in this field. Otherwise, leave this field blank.
For details on assigning a Group ID. reference t he Monitoring Default Data record in the
Monitoring Plan instructions.
Number of I nits in Group
Element Name: NumberOfUnitsInGroup
If this test was performed to be applied to a group of identical units, report the number of units in
the group. Otherwise, leave this field blank.
Number of Tests for Group
Element Name: NumberOfTestsForGroup
If this test was performed to be applied to a group of identical units, report the number of tests
performed for the group. Otherwise., leave this field blank.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions — Page 177
-------
March 11, 2015
3.6.3 Unit Default Test Run Data
3.6.3 Unit Default Test Run Data
Figure 48
Unit Default Test Run Data XML Elements
Unit Default Test Run Data Elements
Use the following instructions for completing each element of the Unit Default Test Run Data
record.
Operating Level for Run
Element Name: OperatingLevelForRun
Report the operating level for the Unit Default Test run, using "1" as the lowest level.
Run Number
Element Name: RunNumber
Assign a run number to each run. You may assign run numbers either consecutively for each test
(e.g., for a four-load test you may use run numbers one through twelve to represent the three runs
at the four load levels) or for each load level within the test (i.e., one through three for the runs at
each load level). At a minimum, runs must be numbered consecutively in time order within a load
level. Within a load level, do not skip or repeat a run number.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 178
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
3.6.3 Unit Default Test Run Data
March 11, 2015
Begin Date
Element Name: BeginDate
Report the date on which the run began.
Begin Hour
Element Name: BeginHour
Report the hour in which the run began.
Begin Minute
Element Name: BeginMinute
Report the minute in which the run began.
End Date
Element Name: EndDate
Report the date on which the run ended.
End Hour
Element Name: EndHour
Report the hour in which the run ended.
End Minute
Element Name: EndMinute
Report the minute in which the run ended.
Response Time
Element Name: Response Time
Report the response time in seconds according to Sections 8.2.5 and 8.2.6 of Method 7E in
Appendix A-4 to Part 6. This value is used to determine the sampling time at each point.
Reference Value
Element Name: Reference Value
Report the reference method value for the run in NOx pounds per mmBtu, rounded to three decimal
places.
Run Used Indicator
Element Name: RunUsedlndicator
Identify and flag the three runs that are used to determine the highest three-run average NOx
emission rate at any tested load level by reporting "0" for "no" or "1" for "yes" in this field. Flag
only these three runs. Leave this field blank for all other test runs.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 179
-------
July 2014
3.6.4 Unit Default Protocol Gas Data
3.6.4 Unit Default Protocol Gas Data
Figure 49
Unit Default Protocol Gas Data XML Elements
Description of Data
For LME fuel or unit default tests conducted using Method 6C, 7E, or 3 A report one record for
each cylinder used to determine analyzer calibration error, drift, and system bias. A minimum of
three records should be reported, one for each gas level (High, Mid, and Low).
Specific Considerations
• You must report a Protocol Gas Data record when using standard reference material,
NIST-traceable reference material, gas manufacturer's intermediate standard, research gas
mixture, or SRM-equivalent compressed gas primary reference material in place of an EPA
Protocol gas. Report all data elements in this record except the PGVP Vendor ID and the
Expiration Date of the cylinder.
• You must report a Protocol Gas Data record when using purified air material as the
high-level O2 gas. Do not report the Cylinder ID, PGVP Vendor ID, and the Expiration
Date of the cylinder.
• For tests conducted using EPA Reference Method 3 A, 6C, or 7E, report Gas Type Code
"ZERO" if a zero gas is used as the low level calibration gas of the reference analyzer. Do
not report the Cylinder ID, PGVP Vendor ID, and the Expiration Date of the cylinder.
• Per 75.21(g)(6), you may use a non-expired EPA Protocol gas acquired from a vendor not
participating in the PGVP as long as the cylinder was acquired prior to 60 days after the
final rule is published in the FR. Report a Protocol Gas Data record for each cylinder
acquired from a vendor not participating in the PGVP program. Report all data elements,
reporting "NONPGVP" as the PGVP Vendor ID.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 180
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
3.6.4 Unit Default Protocol Gas Data
March 11, 2015
Unit Default Protocol Gas Data Elements
Gas Level Code
Element Name: GasLevelCode
Report a calibration gas level code of HIGH, MID, or LOW to indicate the concentration of the gas
in the cylinder. The definition of a high-level, mid-level, and low-level calibration gas can be
found in the Part 75 performance specifications for linearity checks and in EPA Reference Method
7E for RAT As.
Gas Type Code
Element Name: GasTypeCode
Report one or more of the gas type codes in Table 9 of Section 2.3.4 to indicate the type(s) of
gas(es) in the cylinder.
Note: If you use a blend of EPA Protocol gases that is not present in this table, you may report a
value of "APPVD", but you will need to contact EPA before submitting the data in order to get
permission to use this code.
Cylinder Identifier
Element Name: Cylinderldentifier
Report the vendor-assigned identification or serial number found on the cylinder.
For purified air material, leave this field blank.
Vendor Identifier
Element Name: Vendor Identifier
For an EPA Protocol gas, report the EPA-assigned PGVP Vendor ID of the production site that
supplied the cylinder. PGVP Vendor IDs are year specific, therefore report the assigned PGVP
Vendor ID that is applicable on the date the cylinder is certified. An up-to-date list of PGVP
Vendor IDs will be located on the EPA website, and can be accessed via the ECMPS Support
website.
Report "NONPGVP" if the cylinder was purchased from a non-participating vendor prior to 60
days after the final rule is published in the FR.
Leave this field blank if the Gas Type Code is ZERO, AIR, SRM, NTRM, GMIS, RGM, or PRM.
Expiration Date
Element Name: ExpirationDate
For an EPA Protocol gas, SRM, NTRM, GMIS, RGM, or PRM, report the cylinder's expiration
date.
Leave this field blank if the Gas Type Code is AIR or ZERO.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 181
-------
March 11, 2015
3.6.5 Unit Default Air Emission Testing Data
3.6.5 Unit Default Air Emission Testing Data
Figure 50
Unit Default Air Emission Testing Data XML Elements
Description of Data
Report at least one Air Emission Testing Data record for each LME Unit Default Test. One
record should be reported for each on-site Qualified Individual from an Air Emission Testing Body
who conducted or oversaw the test. The Qualified Individual must be qualified for the methods
employed in the test.
Unit Default Air Emission Testing Data Elements
QI Last Name
ElementName: QILastName
Report the last name of the on-site Qualified Individual who conducted or oversaw the test.
QI First Name
ElementName: QIFirstName
Report the first name of the on-site Qualified Individual who conducted or oversaw the test.
QI Middle Initial
ElementName: QIMiddlelnitial
Report the middle initial of the on-site Qualified Individual who conducted or oversaw the test.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 182
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
3.6.5 Unit Default Air Emission Testing Data
March 11, 2015
AETB Name
ElementName: AETBName
Report the name of the Air Emission Testing Body that performed the test.
AETB Phone Number
ElementName: AETBPhoneNumber
Report the phone number of the Air Emission Testing Body that performed the test. The number
should contain dashes and be formatted as 999-999-9999.
AETB Email
ElementName: AETBEmail
Report the email address of the Air Emission Testing Body that performed the test.
ExamDate
ElementName: ExamDate
Report the date that the on-site Qualified Individual took and passed the relevant qualification
exam(s) for the reference method(s) that were performed during the test.
Provider Name
ElementName: ProviderName
Report the name of the provider(s) of the qualification test that took place on the exam date.
Provider Email
ElementName: ProviderEmail
Report the email address of the provider(s) of the qualification test that took place on the exam
date.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 183
-------
March 11, 2015
4.0 Miscellaneous Tests
4.0 Miscellaneous Tests
Figure 51
Miscellaneous Tests XML Structure
—pTeatTypcCodte |
—|
—pspiiiiScifeEode]
-C
<
TfcstNumbcr
1
TeMRe^onCMie
i
TestResuttCode
i
H5
Description of Data
You only need to use the Test Summary Data record to report the following miscellaneous test
types:
• DAHS verification;
• Leak Check for Differential Pressure-type Flow Monitor;
• Primary Element Inspection for orifice, nozzle or venturi-type fuel flowmeter;
• PEMS three-run Relative Accuracy Audit (RAA) with RM or portable analyzer;
• Gas flow meter calibration (sorbent trap monitoring systems);
• Temperature sensor calibration (sorbent trap monitoring systems); and
• Barometer calibration (sorbent trap monitoring systems).
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 184
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
4,0 Miscellaneous Tests
March 11,2015
If you are required to perform some additional type of test that lias not been defined except
through a petition or policy instruction, report the results of that testing in a Test Summary
Data record by identifying the test type as "OTHER" and providing a description of the test in
the 1'est Description field.
Test Summary Data Elements for Miscellaneous Tests
Unit ID or Stack Pipe ID
Element Name: I 'nirSrackPipelD
Report the Unit ID or Stack Pipe ID that corresponds to the test location.
Test Type Code
Element Xante: TestTypeCode
Report the code from Table 43 indicating the 'type of test performed
T able 43
Miscellaneous Test Type Codes and Descriptions
< (Kit'
Drscrip! ion
DAHS
DAHS Verification
DGFMCAL
Dry gas meter calibration (sorbent trap monitoring system)
MFMCAL
Mass flow meter calibration (sorbent trap monitoring system)
TSCAL
Temperature sensor calibration (sorbent trap monitoring systems)
BCAL
Barometer calibration (sorbent trap monitoring systems)
QGA
Quarterly Gas Audit (HCI and HF monitoring systems)
LEAK
Differential Pressure-Type Flow Monitor Leak Check
OTHER
Other Test
PEI
Primary Element Inspection
PEMSACC
Three-run Relative Accuracy Audit (RAA) for PEMS with RM or Portable
Analyzer
Monitoring System ID
Element Name: MonitoringSystemlD
If the test is performed at the System level (e.g.. PEMSACC). report the three-character ID
assigned to ihe monitorms ^vstem. For tests (hat me not NVMem level u\u.. DAHS, LEAK.
D( iF\K Al.. Ml M( Al.. and PHI), leave the System ID Wank and report the three-character
Component ID for the component being tested. For test type QGA, report the ID number of
relevant component type "HCL" or "HF"
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions — Page 185
-------
March IL 2015
4,0 Miscellaneous Tests
(Note: For test types DGFMCAL, MFMCAL, TSCAL. and BCAL, report the ID number of
component type "STRAIN").
Component ID
Element Name: ComponentID
Report the three-character IDs assigned to the component. If a Component ID is not reported,
you must report a Monitoring System ID for the system being tested.
Span Scale Code
Element Name: SpanScaleCode
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to any miscellaneous test type.
Test Number
Element Name: TestNumber
At each monitoring location and for each test type, report a unique test number for each set of
records which comprises a single test. One method of tracking unique test numbers is to use the
System ID or Component ID as a prefix to the number. The test number may not be reused at
this location for the same test type.
Test Reason Code
Element Name: TestReasonCode
Report the purpose of the test using the appropriate code from Table 44,
Table 44
Miscellaneous Test Reason Codes and Descriptions
r,ui.
v.uiic
Desciiptton
Applicable Test Types
INITIAL
Initial Certification
Ail test types, except LEAK.
DIAG
Diagnostic
All test types
QA
Periodic Quality Assurance
All test types, except DAMS
RECERT
Recertification
AM test types, except LEAK
Test Description
Element Name: TestDescription
If you report a Test Type Code of "OTHER," use this field to describe the test activity.
Otherwise, leave this field blank.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions — Page 186
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
4,0 Miscellaneous Tests
March 11,2015
Test Result Code
Element Name: TestResuItCode
Report the appropriate code from. Table 45 below to indicate the result of the test.
Table 45
Miscellaneous Test Result Codes and Descriptions
(ode
Description
ABORTED
Test was aborted due to problems with the installed monitoring system.
FAILED
Test was failed.
PASSED
Test was passed.
Begin Date
Element Name: BeginDate
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to any miscellaneous test type.
Begin Hour
Element Name: BeginHour
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to any miscellaneous test type.
Begin Minute
Element Name: BeginMimtte
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to any miscellaneous test type.
End Date
Element Name: EndDate
Report the date on which the test ended.
End Hour
Element Name: End Hour
Report the hour during which the test ended.
End Minute
Element Same: EndMhmte
Report the minute at which the test ended.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions — Page 187
-------
March 11, 2015
4.0 Miscellaneous Tests
Grace Period Indicator
Element Name: GracePeriodlndicator
For the leak check of a differential pressure-type flow monitor, report a "1" if the test was
performed during a grace period and "0" if the test was performed either on-schedule or after the
expiration of an allotted grace period. For other test types, leave this field blank.
Year
Element Name: Year
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to any miscellaneous test type.
Quarter
Element Name: Quarter
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to any miscellaneous test type.
Test Comment
Element Name: TestComment
Report a comment regarding the test if desired.
Injection Protocol Code
Element Name: InjectionProtocolCode
Leave this field blank. It does not apply to any miscellaneous test type.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 188
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
5.0 QA Certification Event Data
March 11, 2015
5.0 QA Certification Event Data
Figure 52
QA Certification Event Data XML Elements
QACertift
StackPipelD
-UmitlD
QACerfEventCode
QACerlEventD&te
QACertEventHour
Com ptetionTe stPite [
Com pletlonTestHou r
Description of Data
Normal operation and maintenance of monitoring systems usually necessitates replacement or
repair of various components or changes to the type of equipment or software installed to
measure and report emissions. These changes may occur unexpectedly during normal operation
or according to a maintenance schedule. Diagnostic testing and in some instances certification or
recertification testing is required when such repairs, component replacements, or equipment
changes are made.
Submit one QA Certification Event Data record for each event requiring certification,
recertifi cation or other non-routine testing of a monitoring system. This data record identifies
the nature of the event, the date and time it occurred, and the monitoring system and/or
component to which it is relevant. Also, for ozone season only reporters, submit a QA
Certification Event Data record when using conditional data validation in situations where
the required QA linearity or RATA was not completed by the required deadline (i.e., April 30 or
July 30, as applicable; see §75.74(c)(2)(ii)(F) and (c)(3)(ii)(E)).
The QA Certification Event Data record also defines any time period(s) during which data
from a monitoring system are considered to be "conditionally valid" pending the outcome of the
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 189
-------
March 11, 2015
5.0 QA Certification Event Data
required certification, recertification, quality assurance, or diagnostic tests. Data are considered
quality-assured when all of the required QA tests have been successfully completed. When
"conditional" data validation is used, it must be done in accordance with procedures in
§75.20(b)(3) prior to completing all of the required certification, recertification, or diagnostic
testing. Under §75.20(b)(3), the conditionally valid data status begins when a probationary
calibration error test is passed. If the required QA tests are then completed in a timely manner
with no failures, the conditionally valid data are considered to be quality-assured back to the
hour of completion of the probationary calibration error test.
Regarding recertifications, note that with one exception (i.e., changing of the polynomial
coefficient(s) or K-factor(s) of a flow monitor or moisture monitoring system) the definition of a
"recertification event" is limited to those non-routine changes to a monitoring system or process
which require either: (1) RATA(s); (2) fuel flowmeter accuracy testing; (3) a full QA sequence
of transmitter tests and primary element inspections (for orifice, nozzle and venturi-type fuel
flowmeters); or (4) regeneration of an Appendix E NOx correlation curve. Submittal of a formal
recertification application is required only for such recertification events.
Note that when a monitoring system is replaced, a new, unique system ID is assigned and the
new system must be tested for certification. When an analyzer is replaced in a previously
certified system and a new system ID is assigned, this is also considered to be a certification
event. If the old system ID is retained, it is considered to be a recertification event (refer to the
Part 75 Emissions Monitoring Policy Manual).
Report a QA Certification Event Data record as follows:
• When conducting initial certification testing of any system on a new (or newly-affected)
unit.
• Whenever recertification testing or diagnostic testing is required as a result of changes
made to a previously certified monitoring system (or as the result of changes in the
manner of operating the process). Refer to the Part 75 Emissions Monitoring Policy
Manual.
• When a monitoring system is replaced with a new system (having a new system ID) and
is tested for certification.
• When the conditional data validation procedures of §75.20(b)(3) are used following
repair, corrective maintenance or reprogramming of the monitor (see Sections 2.2.3(b)(3)
and 2.3.2(b)(3) of Appendix B).
• For ozone season-only reporters, when using conditional data validation because the
required QA linearity check or RATA was not completed by the required deadline.
• If a routine quality assurance test is done for the dual purposes of routine QA and
recertification (see Part 75, Appendix B, Section 2.4).
• For the required linearity checks and (if applicable) system integrity checks of non-
redundant backup monitors and temporary "like-kind replacement" analyzers, when these
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 190
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
5.0 QA Certification Event Data
March 11, 2015
monitors are brought into service (see §75.20(d)(2)(iii) and section 2.2.4 of Appendix A
to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart UUUUU).
• When the polynomial coefficients or K-factor(s) of a flow monitor or moisture
monitoring system are changed, triggering an unscheduled RATA requirement.
• When a change from a non-CEMS-based monitoring methodology to a CEMS
methodology occurs (e.g., changing from Appendix E to a CEMS for NOx), and the
conditional data validation procedures of §75.20(b)(3) are applied during the CEMS
certification process.
• When recertification is required as a result of events referenced in §75.4.
Do not report a QA Certification Event Data record:
• For the routine periodic quality assurance tests required under Appendices B, D, and E of
Part 75, or under section 5 in Appendix A to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart UUUUU, except
when conditional data validation is used.
• If the only diagnostic test required for a particular event is a calibration error test.
• For any event listed in the recertification and diagnostic testing tables in the Part 75
Emissions Monitoring Policy Manual that does not require QA Certification Event
Data record to be submitted.
• When a change from a CEMS-based monitoring methodology to a non-CEMS
methodology occurs (e.g., switching from an SO2 CEMS to Appendix D, or changing
from a NOx CEMS to Appendix E ). In such cases, simply use the MONITORING METHOD
Data records to indicate changes in monitoring methodology. However, if the opposite
occurs, (i.e., changing from a non-CEMS-based methodology to CEMS), report a QA
Certification Event Data record if the conditional data validation procedures of
§75.20(b)(3) are applied during the CEMS certification process.
Specific Considerations
The following typical certification, recertification, and maintenance events would be reported in
this record.
• Replacement of an entire continuous emission monitoring system;
• Change-outs of analytical or other monitoring system components;
• DAHS vendor changes or software version upgrades;
• Changing of the polynomial coefficient(s) or K-factor(s) of a flow monitor or moisture
monitoring system;
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 191
-------
March 11, 2015
5.0 QA Certification Event Data
• Modification to the flue gas handling system or unit operation that significantly changes
the flow or concentration profile;
• Probe location change, for gas monitoring systems;
• Flow monitor location change; and
• Other system modifications that require one or more tests, as determined in accordance
with the EPA policy (refer to the Part 75 Emissions Monitoring Policy Manual) or
through consultation with EPA Regional Office and Headquarters staff.
QA Certification Event Data XML Elements
Use the following instructions for completing each element of the QA Certification Event
Data record.
Unit ID or Stack Pipe ID
Element Name: UnitID or StackPipelD
Report either the Unit ID or Stack Pipe ID that corresponds to the monitoring location applicable
to the QA certification event being described. This is the alphanumeric code assigned by a
source to identify a unit, stack, or pipe.
Monitoring System ID
Element Name: MonitoringSystemID
If the event requires any system-level tests (e.g., RATA), report the unique three-character
alphanumeric IDs assigned to the monitoring system affected by the event. If a new monitoring
system ID is assigned (e.g., when an entire monitoring system is replaced) report the new system
ID number. If only component-level tests are required (e.g., linearity checks), leave this field
blank.
Component ID
Element Name: ComponentID
If the event requires any component-level tests report the component ID subject to the
certification/recertification/diagnostic testing. (If the event affects the entire system and requires
tests on more than one component, be sure to report a QA Certification Event record for each
applicable component.) If the event only requires system level tests (e.g., a RATA), leave this
field blank. Examples of Event Codes that are system specific but not component-specific
include 10, and 130.
QA Cert Event Code
Element Name: QACertEventCode
Report one of the codes in Table 46 to identify an event that occurred and requires some type of
QA, Certification, Recertification, or Diagnostic testing.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 192
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
5,0 QA Certification Event Data
March 11,2015
Table 46
QA or Certification Event Codes and Descriptions
Code
Description
1
DAHS Vendor Change
2
DAHS Software Version Upgrade
3
DAHS Failure
5
Change or Insert New Temperature, Pressure, or Molecular Weight Correction
Algorithms in the DAHS for a Dilution-Type Monitoring System
10
Change or Insert New Mathematical Algorithms in the DAHS to Convert NO
Concentration to Total NO*
15
Change Missing Data Algorithms
20
Installation of Add-on SO, Emission Controls
25
Installation of Add-on NO, Emission Controls
26
Installation of Add-on NOr Emission Controls - Low Range Not Added but
Stratification Detected
27
Installation of Add-on NQ„ Emission Controls - High Range Not Affected
30
Addition of a Low-Scale Measurement Range (Not associated with add-on control
installation)
35
Addition of a High-Scale Measurement Range (Not associated with add-on control
installation)
40
Construction of New Stack or Flue
50
Recertification. Required Following Long Term Cold Storage or Shut Down as a Result
ot Planned or Forced Outage (reusing previously certified systems)
51
Recertification Required Following Long Term Cold Storage or Shut Down as a Result
of Planned or Forced Outage (systems modified, or replaced)
99
Other
100
Permanent Gas Analyzer Replacement (Like-kind Analyzer, per Policy Question 7.13)
101
Permanent Gas Analyzer Replacement (Not Like-kind)
102
Replace or Repair any of These Components of an Extractive or Dilution-Type
System — Photomultiplier. Lamp. Internal Analyzer Filter or \ acuum Pump. Capillary
Tube, 03 Generator, Reaction Chamber, NO> Converter, Ozonator Dryer, Sample Cell,
Optical Fibers
105
Permanent Replacement of Umbilical Line
106
Replace or Repair any of These Components of an Iii-Situ Monitoring System — Light
Source, Projection Mirrors, UV Filter. Fiberoptic Cable. Spectrometer Grating, Mirrors
or Mirror Motor
107
Repah" or Replace Circuit Board in an In-Situ System
108
Change the Location or Measurement Path of an In-Situ Monitor
(coot)
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions — Page 193
-------
March IL 2015
5,0 QA Certification Event Data
Table 46
QA or Certification Event Codes and Descriptions (cont.)
Code
Description
109
Replacement of a Continuous Moisture Sensor
110
Gas Analyzer Probe Replacement (Same Location, Different Length)
120
New Gas Monitoring System (Complete Replacement or Methodology Change)
125
Initial Certification tGas Monitoring System). Use this code only: (a) for CEM or
PEMS certification at new and newly affected units; or ib) when reconfiguration occurs
(e.g., switching from common stack to unit-level monitoring)
130
Gas Monitoring System Probe Relocation
140
Temporary Use of a Like-kind Replacement Non-redundant Backup Analyzer
141
Replacement of Primary Analyzer Alter Temporary Use of a Like-kind Replacement
Analyzer
150
Temporary Use of a Regular Non-redundant Backup Monitoring System
151
Replacement of Primary Analyzer After Temporary Use of a Regular Non-redundant
Backup Monitoring System
160
Changes to the Mathematical Algorithm or K-factor(s) of a Moisture Monitoring
System
170
Change to the Span Value of a Gas Monitor
171
Change to the Low Range Span Value of a Gas Monitor
172
Change to the High Range Span Value of a Gas Monitor
175
Adjustment of a Gas Monitor Following Failed QA Test
180
Critical Orifice Replacement (Same Size). This code is not appropriate for probe
components. Rather, report this code for the monitoring system or analyzer to be
recertified as a result of the orifice change.
185
Critical Orifice Replacement (Different Size). This code is not appropriate for probe
components. Rather, report this code for the monitoring system or analyzer to he
recertified as a result of the orifice change.
190
Probe Replacement — Dilution-Extractive Monitoring System (Same Length. Location,
and Dilution Ratio)
191
Major Modification to Dilution Air Supply
192
Disassemble and Reassemble Dilution Probe for Service
195
Change from In-Stack to (Xn-of-Stack Dilution (or vice-versa)
200
For PEMS or Gas and/or Flow CEMS, Modification to the Flue Gas Handling System
or Unit Operation That Significantly Changes the Flow or Concentration Profile (No
other changes made to the monitoring systems)
250
Initial Certification of PEMS
(coilt.)
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions — Page 194
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
5,0 QA Certification Event Data
March 11,2015
Table 46
QA or Certification Event Codes and Descriptions (cont.)
Code
Description
251
For PEMS, Modification to the Flue Gas Handling System or Unit Operation That
Significantly Changes the Flow or Concentration Profile
252
Granges to Instrumentation Used as Input to PEMS
253
Minor Change to PEMS Software
254
Expansion of PEMS Operating Envelope
255
PEMS Replacement
300
New Flow Monitoring System (Complete Replacement or Methodology Change)
301
Changes to the Polynomial Coefficients or K-factor(s) of a Flow Monitor
302
Flow Monitor Transducer Replacement
305
Initial Certification (Flow Monitor). Use tins code only: (a) for flow monitor
certification at new and newly-affected units; or (b) when reconfiguration occurs (e.g..
switching from common stack to unit-level monitoring)
310
Other Major Flow Monitor Component Replacement or Repair (e.g., DP Probe.
Thermal Sensor, Transducer Electronics)
311
Flow Monitor Relocation
312
Stack Flow-to-Load Ratio or GHR Test Failure
400
Fuel Flowmeter Replacement
401
Fuel Flowmeter Transmitter/Transducer Replacement
402
Fuel Flowmeter Primary Element Replacement (Orifice, Nozzle or Venturi-type, Same
Dimensions)
403
Fuel Flowmeter Primary Element Replacement (Orifice, Nozzle or Venturi-type,
Different Dimensions)
405
Fuel Flowmeter Primary Element Replacement (Other Types of Flowmeters)
410
Fuel Flow-to-Load or GHR Test Failure
501
For Appendix E Systems, Modifications to the Flue Gas Handling System or Unit
Operation that Significantly Changes the Flow or Concentration Profile Requiring a
Eetest Under Appendix E to Part 75 to Reestablish the NO, Correlation Curve
502
For Appendix E Units, Exceeding the Excess 02 Lewi for > 16 Consecutive Operating
Hours
503
For Appendix E Units. Exceeding the Water to Fuel or Steam to Fuel Rates for >16
Consecutive Operating Hours
504
For Appendix E Units, Exceeding Other QA/'QC Parameters for >16 Consecutive
Operating Honrs
600
Opacity Monitor or Particulate Matter Monitor Complete Replacement
(coiit.)
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions — Page 195
-------
March IL 2015
5,0 QA Certification Event Data
Table 46
QA or Certification Event Codes and Descriptions (cont.)
Code
T~\ At l^l'J J"1 <><>»!
A/v »jv i I|MitJII
605
Initial Certification of Opacity Monitor
610
Opacity Monitor or Particulate Matter Monitor Transceiver Replacement
620
Opacity Monitor or Particulate Matter Monitor Transceiver Factory Rebuild
630
Opacity Monitor or Particulate Matter Monitor Relocation
700
For a Low Mass Emissions (LME) Unit, a Change to the Unit or to the Fuel Supply or
Manner of Unit Operation. Requiring Re-determination of the Unit-specific. Fuel-
specific NO* Emission Rate
800
Conditional Data Validation used when QA test not completed by deadline (Ozone
Season-Only Reporters)
QA Cert Event Date
Element Name: QACertEventDate
Report tlie date of the event. If the monitoring system is deemed to be out-of-control (unable to
provide quality-assured data? as a result of changes made ro the system, report the date of that
change. If there is no out-of-control period associated with a particular event, report the date and
how of the beginning of the event. This date and hour must precede the date and hour of
commencement of the required diagnostic or recertiiication tests.
Consider the following scenarios:
• For certifications and recertifications triggered by the replacement of a monitoring
system or an analyzer, report the date and hour on which the replacement monitoring
system or analyzer is first installed.
• For the initial certification of monitoring systems on new (or newly-affected) units (QA
Cert Event Codes 125 and 305). report a date and hour that predates, but is close in time
to, the commencement date and hour of the certification testing. If you use the
conditional data validation procedures of §75.20(b)(3). the beginning date and hour of the
certification event must precede the date and hour of the probationary calibration error
test.
• For installation of add-on controls or the construction of a new stack or flue (QA Cert
Event Codes 20 through 26. and 40). report the date on which emissions first exited to the
atmosphere through the new operating controls, stack, or flue. (Refer to the Part 75
Emissions Monitoring Policy Manual.)
• When a DAHS is replaced or the DAHS software version is upgraded, and the old and
new platforms or software versions are run in parallel (so that there may be a smooth
transition from the old to the new, with no monitoring system out-of-control periods
associated with the DAHS replacement or upgrade), report the date and hour at which the
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions — Page 196
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
5,0 QA Certification Event Data
March 11,2015
new DAHS platform or software version first begins to be run in parallel with the old
platform or version,
• For reeertification of monitoring systems following long-term shutdown (QA Cert Event
Code 50). report the date and hour when the unit recommences commercial operation.
• For ozone season-only reporters who missed the deadline to perform their QA tests and
are using conditional data validation procedures (QA Cert Event Code 800), report the
earlier of the date and how of the probationary calibration error test and the date and hour
thai the QA test was due (May 1 Hour 0 for second-quarsei tests. July 51 Hour 0 for
third-quarter tests),
QA Cert Event Hour
Element Name: QACertEventHour
Report the hour of the event as described above under QA Cert Event Date.
Required Test Code
Element Name: RequiredTestCode
Report one of the codes from Table 47 to specify the test or tests required for the applicable
event. These tests should correspond to the event identified by the QA Cert Event Code. Note
that for CEMS. these codes describe only the full QA tests that are required, not the simplified
linearity and cycle time diagnostic tests described in the reeertification and diagnostic testing
section of the Part 75 Emissions Monitoring Policy Manual. The abbreviated diagnostic tests are
not required to be reported to EPA.
Table 47
Required Test Codes and Descriptions
Code
Description
1
3-Load RATA, 7-Day Calibration Error Test
2
Normal Load RATA, 7-Day Calibration Error Test, linearity Check, Cycle Time
Test
3
3-Load RATA, 7-Day Calibration Error Test, DAHS Verification
4
Normal Load RATA. 7-Day Calibration Error 'l est. Linearity Checks. Cycle Time
Test, DAHS Verification
5
Normal Load RATA
6
3-Load Flow RATA
7
2-Load Flow RATA
8
Normal Load RATA, Linearity Checks
9
Linearity Checks
(cont.)
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions — Page 197
-------
March IL 2015
5,0 QA Certification Event Data
Table 47
Required Test Codes and Descriptions (cont.)
Code
Description
10
Linearity Checks, 7-Day Calibration Error Test
11
Normal Load RATA, 7-Day Calibration Error Test. Linearity Checks
12
Normal Load RATA, Linearity Checks, Cycle Time Test
13
Normal Load RATA, 7-Day Calibration Error Test, Cycle Time Test
14
7-Day Calibration Error Test, Cycle Time Test
15
Normal Load RATA, 7-Day Calibration Error Test
16
Normal Load RATA, Cycle Time Test
17
Linearity Checks, Cycle Time Test
18
7-Day Calibration Error Test
19
Cycle Time Test
20
DAI IS Verification (Formulas*
21
DAHS Verification (Missing Data Routines)
22
DABS Verification (Formulas and Missing Data)
23
DAHS Verification (Formulas and Missing Data), Daily Calibration Error Test
24
Off-line Calibration Demonstration
25
Off-line Calibration Demonstration. 7-Day Calibration Error Test
26
Abbreviated Stack Flow-to-Load Ratio Test
27
3-Load RATA, 7-Day Calibration Error Test
28
Abbreviated Stack Flow-to-Load Ratio Test and possibly a leak check (if DP Trans)
30
Normal Load RATA. 7-Day Calibration Error Test Linearity Check, Cycle Time
Test. 3-Level System Integrity Check
31
Normal Load RATA, Linearity Check. Cycle Time Test, 3-Level System Integrity
Check
32
Normal Load RATA, 7-Day Calibration Error Test. Linearity Check, 3-Level
System Integrity Check
33
Normal Load RATA, Linearity Check, 3-Level System Integrity Check
34
Linearity Check, Single-Point System Integrity Check
35
Gas Audit
36
Normal Load RATA, Gas Audit
40
Angle of View, Angle of Projection, Mean Spectral Response. Response Time,
Calibration. Drift Test, Stack Exit Correction Factor
42
Stack Exit Correction Factor
(coat.)
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions — Page 198
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
5,0 QA Certification Event Data
March 11,2015
Table 47
Required Test C and Descriptions (cont.)
< udf
Him 1 iptioil
51
Fuel Flowmeter Acciuacy Test
52
Fuel Flowmeter Transmitter Test, Primary Element Inspection
53
Fuel Flowmeter Transmitter Test
54
Primary Fuel Flowmeter Element Inspection
55
Abbreviated Fuel Flow-to-Load Test
56
Fuel Flowmeter Transmitter Test, Primary Element Inspection, Re-determine Flow
Coefficients
57
Primary Element Inspection, Re-determine Flow Coefficients
75
Retest of the Appendix E NO, Correlation Curve
76
Re-determination of the Unit-Specific. Fuel-Specific NO* Emission Rate for a Low
Mass. Emissions (LME) Unit
80
PEMS Sensor Validations, Daily QA/QC, Statistical Tests, RATA (at least 30 test
runs at each of three loads)
81
PEMS Daily QA/QC, 3-Riin Relative Accuracy Audit (RAA) with RM. or Portable
Analyzer
82
PEMS Daily QA QC
99
Other (Note That Recertification Application May Be Required)
Conditional Begin Date
Element Name: ConditionalBeginDate
If applicable, report the elate on which conditional data validation began. For gas CEMs
(including He, HC1. and HF) or flow monitoring systems only, whenever using the conditional
data validation procedures of §75.20(b)(3). report the date that a probationary calibration error
lest was successfully completed according to the provision* of §75.20(b)(3). Data are
conditionally valid from that dale until all required te^ts rue passed, provided that all tests are
passed in succession, within the allotted window of time, with no failures.
Note that in most instances, the allotted time for completing the required tests will be as
specified in §75.20(b)(3)(iv). However, for the initial certification of the CEMS installed on a
new (or a newly affected ) unit, the timelines in £75.20
-------
March 11, 2015
5.0 QA Certification Event Data
Also, if the Event Code indicates initial certification, analyzer replacement, or complete
replacement of a monitoring system (Event Codes 40, 50, 51, 100, 101, 120, 125, 151, 250, 255,
300 or 305) and conditional data validation is used, a BAF of 1.000 should be applied to the
hourly data (where applicable) from the beginning of the conditional data validation period to the
completion hour of the certification or recertification RATA. For any other events that require a
RATA, apply the BAF from their previous RATA during the conditional data period, unless that
RATA failed or was aborted, in which case use 1.000.
Conditional Begin Hour
Element Name: ConditionalBeginHour
If applicable, report the hour during which conditional data validation began.
Completion Test Date
Element Name: CompletionTestDate
Report the date on which the last required certification, recertification or diagnostic test was
successfully completed. Leave this field blank if all of the required tests have not been
successfully completed at the time you submit the QA Certification Data file with this QA
Certification Event Data record. To ensure closure of this event, when the required tests are
completed, update this record with the test completion date and hour and resubmit the record.
Completion Test Hour
Element Name: CompletionTestHour
Report the hour during which the last required certification, recertification or diagnostic test was
successfully completed. Leave this field blank if the required tests have not been successfully
completed at the time you submit the QA Certification Data file with this QA Certification
Event Data record.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 200
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
6.0 Test Extension Exemption Data
March 11, 2015
6.0 Test Extension Exemption Data
Figure 53
Test Extension Exemption Data XML Elements
Description of Data
To claim a quarter-specific test extension or exemption from the standard QA test schedule or
requirements under any program, report a Test Extension Exemption Data record. Each
record identifies the monitoring system and/or component to which the extension or exemption
applies the year and quarter of the extension or exemption, and a code indicating the specific
type of extension or exemption being claimed.
Use this record to claim the following types of extensions and exemptions:
For CEM systems:
• Only very low-sulfur fuel was combusted this quarter (extends SO2 RATA deadline).
• Analyzer Range was not used this quarter and fewer than four calendar quarters have
elapsed since the last linearity check on this range (exempts from linearity on that range).
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 201
-------
March 11, 2015
6.0 Test Extension Exemption Data
• Year-to-date usage of this "regular" non-redundant backup monitoring system is no more
than 720 hours and fewer than eight full quarters have elapsed since the last RATA (see
§75.20(d)).
• Emissions exhausted during quarter for less than 168 operating hours through bypass
stack on which a primary-bypass (PB) monitoring system is located (exempts monitor
from linearity and RATA).
For non-CEM systems:
• This calendar quarter was not a "fuel flowmeter QA operating quarter" (as defined in
40 CFR 72.2) for an ozone season-only reporter during quarters one, two, and four
(extends Fuel Flow Accuracy test schedule).
• Duct burner on combined-cycle turbine operated less than 168 operating hours during
quarter (extends accuracy test deadline for fuel flowmeter feeding the duct burner by one
quarter).
Do NOT use this record to claim the following types of extensions and exemptions, because
these extensions and exemptions are being determined through other reporting mechanisms:
• This calendar quarter was not a QA operating quarter (i.e., location operated less than
168 operating hours). (This is determined from hourly emissions data.)
• This calendar quarter was not a fuel flowmeter QA operating quarter {except as noted
above). (This is determined from hourly emissions data.)
• A claim for a 168-hour or 720-hour grace period extension. (This is determined from
hourly emissions data.)
• Linearity test exemption when span value for SO2 or NOxis less than 30 ppm. (This is
determined from the span record in the monitoring plan.)
• Extension of fuel flow accuracy testing through fuel flow-to-load testing. (This is
reported in a fuel flow-to-load test.)
• Special RATA claims (i.e., single-load flow claim, non-normal operating level claim,
operating range exception). (This is reported with the RATA in a Test Qualification
record.)
Test Extension Exemption Data XML Elements
Use the following instructions for completing each element of the Test Extension Exemption
Data record.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 202
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
6.0 Test Extension Exemption Data
March 11, 2015
Unit ID or Stack Pipe ID
Element Name: UnitID or StackPipelD
Report either the Unit ID or Stack Pipe ID.
Year
Element Name: Year
Report the Year to which the extension or exemption applies.
Quarter
Element Name: Quarter
Report the Quarter to which the extension or exemption applies.
Monitoring System ID
Element Name: MonitoringSystemID
If applicable, report the three-character ID assigned to the system to which the extension or
exemption applies. The following exemption types require System ID: LOWSQTR,
LOWSYTD, NRB720, and NONQAPB. If the extension or exemption applies only at a
component level, leave this field blank.
Component ID
Element Name: ComponentID
If applicable, report the three-character ID assigned to the component to which the extension or
exemption applies. The following exemption type requires Component ID: RANGENU,
NONQAPB, and NONQADB. If the extension or exemption applies only at a system level,
leave this field blank.
Hours Used
Element Name: HoursUsed
Report the quarterly or cumulative year-to-date hours, as appropriate. For RANGENU or
LOWSQTR exemptions, report "0" (zero) to indicate that the applicable range was not used or
higher sulfur fuel was not burned at all during the quarter. For LOWSYTD exemptions report
the year-to-date usage of fuel with a sulfur content higher than very low sulfur fuel. For
NONQAOS exemptions, report the number of hours during the quarter in which the fuel type
measured by this fuel flowmeter system was burned. For NRB720 exemptions, report the year-
to-date usage of the non-redundant backup monitoring system. For NONQAPB exemptions,
report the number of operating hours when emissions were exhausted through the bypass stack.
For NONQADB exemptions, report the number of operating hours for the duct burner.
Span Scale Code
Element Name: SpanScaleCode
For exemption type "RANGENU," report "H" or "L" to indicate which range was not used.
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions ~ Page 203
-------
March IL 2015
6.0 Test Extension Exemption Data
Fuel Code
Element Same: FuelCode
For exemption type NOXQAOS. report the fuel type for which the extension is being claimed by-
selecting from the Fuel Codes shown in Table 4S.
Table 48
Fuel Codes and Descriptions for Test Extension Exemption
Code
Description
BFG
Blast Furnace Gas
BUT
Butane (if measured as a gas)
CDG
Coal-Derived Gas
COG
Coke Oven Gas
DGG
Digester Gas
DSL
Diesel Oil
LFG
Landfill Gas
LPG
Liquefied Petroleum Gas (as defined in §72.2)
NNG
Natural Gas
OGS
Other Gas
OIL
Residual Oil
OOL
Other Oil
pix;
Producer Gas
PNG
Pipeline Natural Gas (as defined in §72.2)
PRG
Process Gas
PEP
Propane (if measured as a gas)
RFG
Refinery Gas
SRG
Unrefined Sour Gas
Extension or Exemption Code
Element Name: ExtensionOrExemptionCode
Report the code from Table 49 that corresponds to the type of exemption or extension you are
claiming.
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions — Page 204
Environmental Protection Agency
-------
6.0 Test Extension Exemption Data
March 11,2015
Table 49
Test Extension or Exemption Code
< t Millions
U I li» lVl liK l
LOWSQTR
SO2 RATA deadline extension claimed for this quarter. This
location combusts both very low-sulfur fuel and higher sulfur
fuel, but only very low-sulfur fuel was combusted this quarter
(and no more than eight calendar quarters have elapsed since
the quarter in which the last SO? RATA was performed).
RT 697: Type 2
LOWSYTD
Conditional S02 RATA Exemption Claimed. As of the end
of this quarter, year-to-date usage of fuel with a sulfur
content higher than very low-sulfur fuel is less than 480
hours.
RT 697: Type 4
NONQAOS
Extension of Fuel Flow Accuracy test deadline claimed for
this 11011-hie 1 flowmeter QA operating quarter (there were
fewer than 168 hours during the quarter in which the fuel
type measured by this fuel flowmeter system was burned).
Report this claim, as applicable, for ozone season-only
reporters for quarters 1, 2 and 4.
RT 696: Type 1
NONQAPB
Extension of RATA or Linearity test deadlines claimed for
Primary Bypass (PB) monitors located on a bypass stack to
indicate when the monitored bypass stack operated less than
168 hours. Grace periods and other extensions will be
tracked solely on the unit operating basis.
New
NRB720
Conditional RATA Exemption Claimed for this system.
Year-to-date usage of this non-redundant backup monitoring
system is 110 more than 720 hours and fewer than eight fall
quarters have elapsed since the last RATA.
RT 697: Type 5
RANGENU
Exemption from linearity test at this range claimed because
this analyzer range was not used during this calendar quarter.
RT 698. Code 2
NONQADB
Extension of fuel flow accuracy or transmitter transducer test
deadline claimed for fuel flowmeters feeding duct burners in
combined cycle turbines when the duct burner operated less
than 168 hours.
New
F2LEXP
Exemption from Flow to Load Check Testing under 40 CFR
Part 75. Appendix A. Section 7.8(a). Use of this code
requires EPA approval.
Mew
* From "Revised EDR Version 2,2 Reporting Instructions," December 2005
Environmental Protection Agency
Quality Assurance and Certification Reporting Instructions — Page 205
------- |