^tosrx

i&i) NONPOINTSOIREESRCEESSSTORY

PRO"^

^rtnnsu wmim

Agricultural Best Management Practices Improve Water Quality in
Hungry Run

Waterbody Improvsd Sediments and nutrients from agricultural activities impaired

Hungry Run's aquatic life. As a result, the Pennsylvania Department
of Environmental Protection (PA DEP) added Hungry Run to Pennsylvania's 2002 Clean Water Act
section 303(d) list of impaired waters for excessive siltation and nutrients due to agriculture. The
Hungry Run Section 319 Nonpoint Source Management Program Watershed Implementation Plan
(WIP) was developed in 2008. The Mifflin County Conservation District (MCCD) led watershed
restoration efforts, working with farmers and private landowners to implement agricultural best
management practices (BMPs). Recent monitoring indicates that water quality is improving in the
Hungry Run watershed.

Problem

Hungry Run is a tributary to the Kishacoq u i I las Creek
in the Juniata River and Susquehanna River basins.
The 8-square-mile watershed is in Mifflin County and
is surrounded by wooded ridges and Jack's Mountain.
The stream is relatively small (4.7 miles long) but
flows through three political jurisdictions in Mifflin
County before joining Kishacoquillas Creek in Burnham
Borough (Figure 1).

The watershed's primary land use is forest (62%) but
agricultural activities and some residential develop-
ment dominate its narrow stream valley. Agriculture
(31%) is the other major land use in the watershed and
is considered the source of impairment, according to
PA DEP. Most nutrients are applied to Mifflin County
agricultural land as both fertilizer and manure, often
from dairy and swine production. However, excess
nutrients applied to agricultural land can negatively
impact water quality, resulting in nitrogen and
phosphorus entering waterways through stormwater
runoff. Additionally, tillage and earth disturbance
activities contribute excess sediment to surface waters
through stormwater runoff and streambank erosion
(often due to vegetation removal and increased flow
volumes). Hungry Run's aquatic life use is designated
as Trout Stocked Fishes and Migratory Fishes under
Pennsylvania's Chapter 93 Water Quality Standards.
This aquatic life use is listed as impaired for sediment
and nutrients from agriculture.

Figure 1. Hungry Run is in south-central Pennsylvania.

Story Highlights

Hungry Run is included in the 2017 Kishacoquillas
Alternative Restoration Plan (ARP). In 2017, thisARP
identified load reductions needed from specific
sources in the most impaired subwatersheds, including
Hungry Run. The ARP replaces and improves the total
maximum daily load, includes an accounting of current
BMPs, and uses future modeling scenarios. The ARP
calls for a required annual load reduction of 35% for
sediment and 53% for total phosphorus.

Hungry Run Watershed: 303 (d) Attainment


-------
Table 1. Hungry Run watershed IBI scores1 (2014-2021)

Years

Hungry Run IBI monitoring stations2

Reference

Filson

Glick

Goss Buffer

Lions Club

Old Park

Old Park
Trib.

Pond

Spring

2014

46.6

35.8

30.6

32.8

15.0

34.6

47.9

52.3

22.8

2015

73.2

32.0

45.2

36.7

46.6

39.0

35.8

60.1

43.3

2016

59.0

33.1

43.6

28.8

35.9

41.3

36.8

56.1

33.0

2017

54.2

37.5

48.1

32.2

45.1

36.6

45.1

49.2

31.0

2018

54.0

40.0

40.4

35.9

42.4

36.5

44.7

47.2

34.7

2019

53.8

45.6

50.3

39.2

47.2

36.7

41.1

52.7

39.1

2020

44.1

55.0

61.2

50.1

45.8

46.0

41.6

49.4

51.0

2021

50.4

51.2

54.7

48.4

48.3

54.6

59.8

64.2

28.7

1 IBI scores: > 63 = attaining; 50-63 = requires further evaluation; < 50 impaired.
- Monitoring station locations are shown in Figure 1.

Agricultural BMPs are designed to remedy the prob-
lems of sedimentation and nutrient loading from
farming. The MCCD works with willing landowners to
implement agricultural BMPs to reduce sediment and
nutrient pollutant loads in the Hungry Run watershed,
with the ultimate goal of meeting the water quality
standards. Twenty-four farms in the watershed have
implemented a variety of agricultural and livestock
BMPs to date. BMPs include five manure storage struc-
tures; six heavy use areas; 12,909 feet (2.45 miles) of
stream fencing that created 16 acres of riparian buffers;
seven stabilized livestock crossings; more than 75 in-
stream fish habitat/streambank stabilization structures;
639 acres placed under nutrient management plans
and agricultural erosion and sediment plans; 214 acres
of cover crops; and 539 acres of conservation tillage.

Results

Watershed-wide long-term monitoring efforts began in
2014 to track water quality trends. MCCD's multifaceted
sampling includes field chemistry, water chemistry,
physical habitat assessments and biological (macroin-
vertebrates and fish) assessments. Macroinvertebrate
sampling in 2014 showed low index of biotic integrity
(IBI) scores, which indicate aquatic life use impairment.
An IBI score is a quantitative representation of the ben-
thic macroinvertebrate community living in a stream.

Through annual monitoring, Hungry Run has expe-
rienced significant improvement in water quality
metrics, illustrated by an increase in IBI scores. For
example, Hungry Run Pond registered an IBI score of
64.2 in 2021, signifying the attainment of its aquatic
life use (Table 1). An increase in IBI scores trending
over time indicates an increase in macroinvertebrate
diversity and populations.

The habitat assessments also revealed a general
decrease in streambed embeddedness, which can
be attributed to reduced sediment contributions
from agriculture and streambank erosion. Continued
monitoring and BMP implementation are still needed
to take the significant improvements one step further
to meet water quality standards.

Partners and Funding

Organizations that contributed time and funds to this
project include MCCD, the Chesapeake Bay Foundation's
Buffer Bonus Program, the Pennsylvania Conservation
Reserve and Enhancement Program, the National Fish
and Wildlife Foundation's Small Watershed Grants
Program, and the PA DEP Section 319 Nonpoint Source
Management Grants Program ($1,514,980).

T>

z

^£DSrX

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Water
Washington, DC

EPA 841-F-23-001N
December 2023

For additional information contact:

Ann Devine

Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection
717-772-5653 • adevine@pa.gov


-------