£%.	United States

Environmental Protection
m % Agency

USDA

Bfifi U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Options for Clean Water Solutions

in White Hall, Alabama

February 2024

EPA-830-R-24-011

Closing America's Wastewater Access Gap Community Initiative


-------
Contents

Closing America's Wastewater Access Gap Community Initiative Pilot: EPA/USDA-RD Partnership	3

The Town of White Hall, Alabama	5

Wastewater Treatment Options for White Hall	7

Funding Opportunities	12

Benefits of Investing in Adequate Wastewater Infrastructure	14

Sustaining the Investment Through Operations and Maintenance	16

Partners and Roles	18

Road Map for Implementation	19

Concluding Thoughts	23

Definitions	23

White Hall's Options for Clean Water Solutions

White Hall is a town in Lowndes County, Alabama, with approximately 800 residents. The town is located
between Selma and Montgomery and is part of the southern Black Belt. White Hall's beautiful natural areas,
agricultural spaces, and history are just a few defining features of this community.

Residents of White Hall currently have inadequate wastewater treatment services. For many years, community
members have worked to change this situation. With the passage of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and new
Water Technical Assistance services, there is momentum to bring wastewater treatment solutions to homes
in White Hall. This plan describes technical options and financial resources for wastewater treatment. It is the
product of the combined efforts of many organizations and individuals and provides options for clean water
solutions for the town.


-------
Closing America's Wastewater
Access Gap Community Initiative
Pilot: EPA/USDA-RD Partnership

Introduction

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture Rural Development
(USDA-RD) partnered with six states and three Tribes (two federally recognized and one state-recognized) on the
Closing America's Wastewater Access Gap Community Initiative. As a pilot program, this initiative was the first of
its kind for EPA and USDA-RD. This initiative provides technical assistance to support capacity to improve waste-
water management for the 11 participating communities. EPA and USDA have grant and loan programs to help pay
for wastewater system improvements. Recent increases in federal funding offer an opportunity for communities
to invest in septic upgrades, connect to nearby treatment systems, or build new sewer and wastewater treatment
systems that meet their needs.

EPA offers a range of water technical assistance (WaterTA) for communities to identify water challenges and
solutions, build capacity, and develop application materials to access water infrastructure funding. EPA collabo-
rates with states, Tribes, territories, community partners, and other stakeholders to implement WaterTA efforts.
The result: more communities apply for federal funding to support quality water infrastructure and reliable water
services. Communities can learn more about EPA WaterTA and how to indicate interest in receiving assistance by
visiting EPA's WaterTA website.1

USDA offers a wide range of water and wastewater assistance for rural communities to obtain the technical
assistance and financing necessary to develop drinking water and waste disposal systems. USDA's Water and
Waste Disposal Technical Assistance and Training Grants program helps qualified, private nonprofits provide
technical assistance and training to identify and evaluate solutions to water and waste problems. It also helps
applicants prepare applications for water and waste disposal loans and grants, and it helps associations improve
the operation and maintenance of water and waste facilities in eligible rural areas with populations of 10,000 or
fewer. Communities can learn more about USDA Water and Waste Disposal Technical Assistance and Training
Grants and how to indicate interest in receiving assistance by visiting USDA's website.2

Purpose

EPA and USDA-RD pilot program staff members worked with the pilot program team—the Mayor of White Hall, a
local engineering consultant, the Kelley Group; the local technical assistance providers Communities Unlimited
and Alabama Rural Water Association; the Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM); and
the Alabama Department of Public Health (ADPH)—to develop solutions for White Hall's wastewater issues. This
document, Options for Clean Water Solutions in White Hall, Alabama, outlines potential solutions to address
the needs for improved wastewater treatment approaches in White Hall. Residents and town leadership can use
this information to estimate costs and select a wastewater solution that meets today's challenges and helps the
community thrive.

1	h ttps ://www.e pa .q ov/wa te rta

2	https://www.rd.usda.qov/proqrams-services/water-environmental-proqrams/water-waste-disposal-technical-assistance-traininq-qrants

Options for Clean Water Solutions in White Hall, Alabama

3


-------
Over the past year, the pilot program team has:

1.	Conducted a community wastewater assessment. The pilot program team reviewed existing information
on wastewater systems in White Hall and found areas that need improvement. This review did not include
collecting site information on soils or existing septic systems.

2.	Identified wastewater solutions. The team identified wastewater solutions and estimated their costs. They
considered the community's long-term needs and outlined a path to apply for funding. State and local officials
and community members played a key role in developing these options.

3.	Helped communities find and apply for funding opportunities. This plan outlines federal funding sources
and how to apply for funding. It also shows how to pay for construction and long-term costs. Funding applica-
tions to continue with master planning were submitted and awarded during this process.

4.	Developed a plan to pay for ongoing costs. To install and operate the selected system, the Town of White
Hall will have to develop a plan to pay for construction and ongoing costs. These costs could include
management, operations, maintenance, and any potential construction loan repayments. This plan offers
ideas to get started, such as programs with low-income rate assistance and non-rate revenue programs that
other utilities have used.

4

Options for Clean Water Solutions in White Hall, Alabama


-------
The Town of White Hall, Alabama

White Hall is in the northwest area of Lowndes County, halfway between Selma and Montgomery on U.S. Highway
80. The Lowndes County Visitors Center memorializes the bravery of residents here during the Civil Rights
Movement and their struggle to win equal rights. White Hall is part of an area across the southern United States
called the Black Belt, which is known for its fertile soil (Figure 1). White Hall is one of the larger incorporated areas
in Lowndes County, with nearly 800 residents. The town serves 430 water customers within the town boundary.
The town consists of large lots surrounded by agricultural and natural areas. The Alabama River borders the town
to the north. Highway 80, which connects Selma and Montgomery, runs through the southern part of the town. An
assessment of the community conditions was conducted, which includes a summary of the economic conditions,
physical conditions such as soil analysis and floodplain, and current utility operations for the town.

White Hall, like the rest of Lowndes County and much of the Black Belt, lacks functioning wastewater systems.
While some progress has been made in recent years—for example, the community built a "cluster" system to
serve 45 homes and the elementary school—community feedback indicates there are continuing challenges with
septic systems and access to quality wastewater infrastructure.

Currently, ADPH is taking measures to improve sanitation as part of an interim settlement with the Department
of Justice that was approved in May 2023. The Department of Justice and the Department of Health and Human
Services launched an investigation into whether ADPH's conduct had violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of
1964 and Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act in November 2021. ADPH cooperated throughout the inves-
tigation and agreed to the interim resolution that put ADPH on a path toward developing equitable and safe
wastewater disposal and management systems in Lowndes County.3

Town of White Hall
Utilities Fast Facts

Population: 806 (2020 Census)
Median household income: $32,000
Current drinking water customers:
403

Current average monthly drinking

water bill: $33.08

Current wastewater customers: 46

Current wastewater flow treated:

15,000 gallons per day

Current monthly wastewater bill:

$31.02

Current utility staff: 4

3 https://www.iustice.gov/opa/pr/departments-iustice-and-health-and-human-services-announce-interim-resolution-aqreement

Options for Clean Water Solutions in White Hall, Alabama

5


-------
The Potential of Infrastructure Investment

White Hall residents have expressed support for capital investment in sanitation infrastructure, and they
understand that monthly bills are necessary for maintenance of infrastructure. They want a community where
their children can safely play in their backyards without risking exposure to untreated wastewater. The ability
to do laundry and take a shower at the same time, even during rain, is a basic need. While the primary purpose
of improving the wastewater system is to address the challenging sanitation issues that currently exist in the
community, community leaders indicate that with proper infrastructure they could attract industry; a grocery store;
and potential services such as hotels, gas stations, and restaurants for those who want to explore the natural
beauty and historical significance of Lowndes County. An affordable wastewater system is key to maintaining a
vibrant, productive community.

Community Engagement Feedback

The White Hall City Council, EPA, and USDA-RD held a listening session in March 2023 to gather feedback from
community members on alternatives for a wastewater system. Major points included:

•	Rate affordability is key to maintaining and growing community support.

•	Education must stress that the entire community will play a part in new system development and ongoing
costs, including paying a monthly bill.

•	New infrastructure will require system maintenance.

•	These solutions are long overdue.

•	Residents are encouraged to think about needs for 20 years down the road.

•	The community is encouraged to consider its economic goals.

An economic development professional is working with the Mayor to evaluate opportunities for White Hall.

They found that a new wastewater system could facilitate industrial development along County Road 40 and
commercial or housing development along Highway 80. A gravity sewer is usually most attractive to industry
and commercial businesses due to the ease of building and low onsite maintenance needs. Options to allow
expansion of service to other communities along Highway 80 and County Road 40 are included in the evaluation
to consider a regional approach to wastewater management.

For decades, having a functioning septic system has been a primary concern for many residents of
the Town of White Hall. The extreme cost has significantly prevented residents from installing a proper
septic system, which leads the residents to seek alternative solutions such as 'straight piping' and improper
systems. Since the onset of this project, I have heard negative comments that seem to demean the residents of
Lowndes County for choosing to live here; but, as a lifelong resident, I can relate to their frustrations because I
have suffered from an improper septic system also.

It is time to provide residents of the Town of White Hall with an obtainable solution by replacing and repairing
the deteriorating septic system. Improvements and advancements to the current infrastructure will change the
lives of Lowndes County's residents and make businesses more eager and willing to locate here.

—Mayor Delmartre Bethel

6

Options for Clean Water Solutions in White Hall, Alabama


-------
Wastewater Treatment Options for
White Hall

White Hall has a unique layout that stretches
from the Alabama River to Highway 80 without a
town center (Figure 2). The town has large lots
and clusters of housing that make central waste-
water systems such as gravity sewers more costly
to construct due to the distance between homes.

The USDA Natural Resource Conservation
Service's (NRCS's) web-based soil survey is the
best available data set for soils in White Hall. It
indicates that only 7 percent of the soil in White
Hall is suitable for traditional septic systems, but
local wastewater professionals report that a much
higher percentage of the soil is suitable for
traditional septic systems. As such, additional
analysis would be needed to develop a more
accurate cost estimate for the use of traditional
septic systems. NRCS soil information is often
updated and refined as projects progress.

In 2015, White Hall and USDA-RD agreed to
fund a community treatment system that serves
roughly 45 homes and the elementary school.

This system uses a septic tank effluent pump
(STEP), aeration treatment, and a 20-acre drain-
field off Freedom Road. The utility operations
staff are pleased with its performance and say
it is easy to maintain. They have not received
reports of odors from neighbors. This system
cannot be expanded due to permit limitations, but
adding other community treatment systems is an option for White Hall. Although not common, these types of
cluster or community systems can work for commercial and industrial development instead of a sewer system and
treatment plant. White Hall can also consider conventional gravity sewers and centralized treatment systems that
discharge to either the Alabama River or Big Swamp Creek.

This section explores wastewater system alternatives; estimated capital, operating, and loan repayment costs; and
pros and cons for each option. Central treatment systems are sized to serve 450 connections with a flow volume
of 150,000 gallons per day. Capital costs are based on several information sources, including recent bid tabs,
Preliminary Engineering Reports (PERs), invoices for septic systems that are part of other projects in the Black Belt,
and input from local professionals. The range in capital costs reflects incorporation of a 50 percent contingency in
costs based upon the American Association of Cost Engineers (AACE) cost estimation classification system. The
AACE contingency is the international recommended practice for "Class 5" projects (including water and sewer
infrastructure projects) that are very preliminary and considered 0 to 2 percent developed. Conservative cost
estimates have been used for this preliminary analysis until the data can be refined.

The analysis includes use of mapping tools, web-based soil surveys, and input from local utility staff and consul-
tants. In the future, White Hall will need to check site conditions, conduct a topographic survey, and analyze soil.
Although this study provides a range of cost estimates, White Hall will need to conduct an in-depth analysis to

• Water Meter

i i White Hall Boundary

I I White Hall Community
System 5



°60

L

White Hall

... Jlr. .

Approximate
Location of
Current
Community
Treatment System

US Hwy 80

Figure 2. Relevant features of White Hall, Alabama.

Options for Clean Water Solutions in White Hall, Alabama

1


-------
fully understand the alternatives and their true costs. White Hall received grant funding from ADEM and USDA-RD
to do this analysis through the Feasibility Study for Sanitary Sewer System scheduled to start in early 2024.

Option 1a: Traditional and Engineered Onsite/Septic Systems—Homeowners Responsible
for Maintenance and Replacement

This option examines the use of traditional and engineered onsite/septic systems at each residential and
commercial building, depending on site-specific soil conditions. Option 1a assumes that each homeowner is
responsible for updates, maintenance, and replacement of parts. Replacement of the septic tanks would also be
the responsibility of the homeowner and/or potentially facilitated through grants. Operations, maintenance, and
replacement costs include pumping out the septic system every 5 years, replacing pumps and motors every 10
years, and replacing drainfields every 20 years.

Expected capital cost range: $15 million to $21 million.

Responsibility of individual residents. Costs can range from $20,000 to $30,000 based on soil types.

Expected annual operating costs: $180,000.

Approximate annual costs would range from $200 to $500 per household. Homeowner is responsible for paying
for periodic pumping of septic tank and for motor, pump, and drainfield replacement; however, there is no monthly
bill.

Pros:	Cons:

No monthly bill.

Effective for large lots.

Should not require the town to purchase land.
Can be implemented most quickly to address
immediate needs.

Septic systems are effective if installed and
maintained correctly.

Might not encourage economic growth, as most
businesses want a sewer system.

Homeowners are responsible for replacing
septic tanks.

If homeowners do not keep up with maintenance
needs, the system could fail in 10 years.

Option 1b: Traditional and Engineered Onsite/Septic Systems—Town Forms Responsible
Management Entity for Maintenance

This option examines the use of traditional and engineered onsite/septic systems at each residential and
commercial building depending on site-specific soil conditions. Option 1b assumes the town develops a
Responsible Management Entity program to maintain and replace pumps, motors, and drainfields periodically
in septic systems. Replacement of the septic tanks would still be the responsibility of the homeowner and/or
potentially facilitated through grants. Operations, maintenance, and replacement costs include pumping out the
septic system every 5 years, replacing pumps and motors every 10 years, and replacing drainfields every 20 years.
Responsibilities for the town include planning, implementing, and tracking maintenance activities and equipment
needs.

Expected capital cost range: $15 million to $21 million.

Grant and loan funding is facilitated by the town.

Expected annual operating costs: $180,000.

Homeowners pay electric cost of $4 to $8 per month per household depending on type of septic system, and the
rest ($177,500 average annually) is incurred by the town.

Options for Clean Water Solutions in White Hall, Alabama


-------
Pros:

Most affordable initial monthly bill.

Effective for large lots.

Should not require the town to purchase land.

Can be implemented most quickly to address immediate needs.
Septic systems are effective if installed and maintained correctly.
Costs include periodic system maintenance.

Cons:

•	Might not encourage economic growth,
as most businesses want a sewer
system.

•	Homeowners are responsible for
replacing septic tanks.

Option 2: Community System Approach

This option examines the building of 10 community systems throughout the town to provide service to most
residents. These systems would be managed by the town utility and would include a STEP sewer and community
treatment system with drainfields. Capital costs include renewal of septic tanks and lateral construction.
Operations, maintenance, and replacement costs include flow monitoring and reporting, annual maintenance,
renewing pumps and motors every 7 years, and renewing the drainfield every 10 years. This approach will also
involve maintaining the STEP sewer system: pumping out septic tanks every 5 years, replacing pumps and motors
every 7 years, and paying electric costs for homeowners each month.

Expected capital cost range: $35 million to $50 million.

Expected annual operating costs: $230,000.

Pros:

•	Consistent service throughout the community.

•	Good for larger lots.

•	Encourages economic growth along highways.

Cons:

Operations costs and monthly bills are higher than
those for onsite systems.

Requires the town to buy 20 acres per drainfield
(200 acres of land total).

Parts for treatment systems and STEP systems must
be replaced often.

Option 3: Mix of Onsite/Septic Systems and Community Treatment Systems

This option examines the approach of identifying areas that would benefit from a community treatment system,
such as the existing community system on Freedom Road. These could include areas along Highway 80 and
County Road 40 that could also attract economic growth. The town could use Option 2 for these identified areas
and Option 1b (individual onsite systems with the town acting as a Responsible Management Entity) for the rest of
the town. Operations, maintenance, and replacement costs include a combination of Options 1 and 2, depending
on the systems.

Expected capital cost range: $28 million to $40 million.

Expected annual operating costs: $210,000.

Options for Clean Water Solutions in White Hall, Alabama

9


-------
Pros:

Encourages some economic growth along Highway

80 and County Road 40.

Lowest overall costs based on town providing

maintenance for onsite systems.

Provides flexibility in the approach to short-term

needs and long-term goals.

Cons:

•	Replacing parts in a community treatment system
can raise costs.

•	Allows for some economic growth but might not
meet all expectations.

•	Requires the town to purchase land.

•	May be challenging to set rates for parts of the
community because of the combined options.

Option 4a: Gravity Sewer with Centralized Treatment Using a Lagoon System with End
Treatment

This option explores the approach of building a gravity sewer for most residents that directs to a wastewater
treatment plant. Capital costs include the sewer lateral pipe from the home to the sewer system and decommis-
sioning of the septic tanks. A lagoon system with a recirculating filter end treatment system to improve the water
quality of effluent could be a suitable treatment system. This system is relatively straightforward and the least
costly to operate. This treatment plant would need to discharge to the Alabama River. Operations, maintenance,
and replacement costs include cleaning gravity sewers every 5 years. Staff will need to monitor, maintain, and
repair pump stations as needed. A certified wastewater operator will need to operate the treatment plant and
monitor quality of the treated water discharge. This option requires the town utility to replace pumps, motors, and
controls every 10 years.

Expected capital cost range: $28 million to $41 million.

Expected annual operating costs: $240,000.

Pros:

•	Easiest maintenance option for homeowners.

•	Can provide economic development and extension
to other communities.

•	Economic growth can help lower monthly rates.

Cons:

•	Requires certified wastewater operators, which can
be hard to find.

•	Higher operations and maintenance (O&M) burden
for the utility.

•	Higher monthly rate for customers until economic
growth occurs. With additional customers added to
the system, rates could potentially decrease due to
additional revenue received.

•	Requires the town to purchase land.

Option 4b: Gravity Sewer with Centralized Treatment Using an Advanced Tertiary
Wastewater Treatment System

This option explores the approach of building a gravity sewer for most residents that directs to a wastewater
treatment plant. Capital costs include the sewer lateral pipe from the home to the sewer system and decommis-
sioning of the septic tanks. There are several options for an advanced treatment system, including a conventional
activated sludge plant or sequencing batch reactor with a sand filter end treatment to meet more stringent water
quality regulations. This treatment plant could discharge to Big Swamp Creek. Operations, maintenance, and
replacement costs include cleaning gravity sewers every 5 years. Staff will need to monitor, maintain, and repair
pump stations as needed. A certified wastewater operator will need to operate the treatment plant and monitor
water quality of the treated water discharge. This option requires the town utility to replace pumps, motors, and
controls every 10 years.

10

Options for Clean Water Solutions in White Hall, Alabama


-------
Expected capital cost range: $28 million to $40 million.

Expected annual operating costs: $330,000.

Pros:

Easiest maintenance option for homeowners.
Can provide economic development and extension
to other communities.

Economic growth can help lower monthly rates.

Cons:

•	Requires certified wastewater operators, which can
be hard to find.

•	Highest O&M burden for the utility.

•	Highest monthly rate for customers.

•	Requires the town to purchase land.

Financing Options

The financing options evaluated include:

•	CWSRF principal forgiveness loan: Up to 100 percent principal forgiveness loans through the Clean Water
State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) from ADEM.

•	USDA-RD loan/grant: Rural Development loan/grant that includes a 25 percent loan for a 40-year term at an
assumed interest rate of 2.5 percent with 450 customers. The interest rate is adjusted quarterly.

•	30-year bond: Bond from the Town of White Hall to construct the system on its own, with a 4 percent interest
rate for 450 customers.

Table 1, on the next page, shows the estimated monthly rates for O&M for each option, and the monthly rate
impact of each financing alternative. These estimates assume 450 customers for each system, including some
customers outside the town boundary. Town officials will need to work with the funding agencies throughout the
project development process to determine the level of grant and loan funding available. Funding availability can
change based on several factors, including legislative appropriations, the project ranking process, and number
and type of other applications received.

Options for Clean Water Solutions in White Hall, Alabama


-------
Table 1. Potential Monthly Bills for White Hall, Alabama

Option

Name

Estimated
Capital Cost
Range

Estimated O&M
Monthly Bill
per Customer

Monthly Bill
Addition for
Financing
Options
of Capital
Costs

(CWSRF
Principal
Forgiveness
Loan")

Monthly Bill
Addition for
Financing
Options
of Capital
Costs

(USDA-RD
25% Loan
75% Grant)

Monthly Bill
Addition for
Financing
Options
of Capital
Costs

(30-Year
Bond)

1a

Onsite/septic
systems,
maintenance by
homeowners'1

$15 million—
$21 million

No monthly bill,
annual cost of
$200-$500c

Financing
dependent
on individual
situations

Financing
dependent
on individual
situations

Financing
dependent
on individual
situations

1b

Onsite/septic
systems, mainte-
nance by townb

$15 million—
$21 million

$35

$0

$28

$165

2

Community

systems'1

$35 million—
$50 million

$44

$0

$64

$370

3

Mix of onsite
and community

systems

$28 million—
$40 million

$35

$0

$48

$280

4a

Lagoon
treatment

$28 million—
$41 million

$50

$0

$53

$310

4b

Advanced
treatment

$28 million—
$40 million

$68

$0

$53

$310

a Full principal forgiveness is possible but not guaranteed. Funding availability is dependent on several factors.
The town will need to engage with ADEM and USDA along the way to determine grant funding availability.

b Capital and O&M costs for onsite/septic systems and community systems could be reduced based on results of
soil testing. Costs are based on unsuitable soils as noted in the USDA Web Soil Survey.

c Homeowners would pay for periodic pumping of septic tank and replacement of pumps, motors, and drainfields
as the system needs maintenance, but would not receive a monthly bill.

Funding Opportunities

The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law provides additional funding to the CWSRF for loans and grants to small,
rural, and disadvantaged communities that can be leveraged with USDA-RD funds to address inadequate
water and wastewater systems. There are multiple potential funding sources for White Hall, including USDA-RD
and the CWSRF administered by ADEM.

12

Options for Clean Water Solutions in White Hall, Alabama


-------
Overview of the CWSRF Program Administered by ADEM

•	The Alabama CWSRF is a low-interest loan program intended to finance public infrastructure improvements.

•	Eligibility is based on ADEM's affordability criteria, which include population trends, unemployment rate, poverty
rate, and location of the project on the environmental justice Justice40 map. Based on current data, ADEM staff
have indicated that the Town of White Hall would qualify for subsidy through principal forgiveness loans. This will
need to be confirmed at time of application(s).

•	Communities that qualify for subsidy generally receive additional subsidy in the form of principal forgiveness in
their assistance agreements.

•	Three years of financial audits are required for the application process.

•	Alabama establishes its Intended Use Plan (IUP) and current year priorities for this program at the end of
March each year. The state accepts applications year-round, but to receive funding for State Revolving Fund
(SRF)-eligible projects and be placed on the IUP for the current year, communities should submit applications
before February 28 of that year.

•	The loan term is generally 20 years, and the interest rate is below market. The interest rate is adjusted annually.

•	As a result of an SRF application, ADEM allotted the Town of White Hall $450,000 from the American Rescue
Plan Act (ARPA) for conducting a sewer system feasibility analysis in White Hall.

Overview of USDA's Rural Development Water and Environmental
Programs: Water and Waste Disposal Loans and Grants

•	Through Rural Utilities Service Water and Environmental Programs, rural communities obtain the technical
assistance and financing necessary to develop drinking water and waste disposal systems.

•	USDA-RD has long-term, low-interest loan financing programs to assist communities with infrastructure costs.
There are opportunities for grants combined with loans for communities that qualify.

•	Eligibility for funding is based on median household income (MHI) and population of the community.

•	White Hall would be considered for other USDA-RD programs, such as Persistent Poverty assistance, which can
provide a higher percentage of grant funds.

•	USDA-RD loans and grants require financial audits, as well as a commitment to revenue collection during the life
of the loan.

•	For communities receiving loans, the loan term can be up to 40 years based on the expected life of the system.

•	The interest rate is adjusted quarterly.

•	Special Evaluation Assistance for Rural Communities and Household (SEARCH) grants can assist with funding.
White Hall was awarded a SEARCH grant for $70,000 on August 31, 2023.

-	The SEARCH program helps very small, financially distressed rural communities with predevelopment
feasibility studies, design, and technical assistance on proposed water and waste disposal projects.

-	State and local government entities, nonprofits, and federally recognized Tribes may apply.

-	The area to be served must be rural, have a population of 2,500 or fewer, and have an MHI that is below
the poverty line or less than 80 percent of the statewide MHI.

•	USDA-RD accepts applications year-round on a rolling basis through RD Apply.4

•	More information is available on USDA's website.5

4	https://www.rd.usda.qov/proqrams-services/rd-applv

5	https://www.rd.usda.qov/proqrams-services/water-environmental-proqrams

Options for Clean Water Solutions in White Hall, Alabama

13


-------
Current Funding Programs for Septic System Upgrades

•	ADEM is actively developing a program to make loans to an organization such as the town (but not individuals)
for septic system upgrades. It expects to have that program established in approximately 1 year. Conversations
with ADEM staff indicated that they are considering having a Responsible Management Entity that would be
responsible for maintenance of onsite/septic systems that are part of this program. This program is included as
a current funding program since it is under development and expected to be available within a year.

•	ADPH established a program for individuals in Lowndes County prior to an interim agreement with the
Department of Justice that meets the requirements of that settlement. Currently, ADPH is collecting information
through an online survey of Lowndes County residents about the needs for their septic systems. ADPH will use
the information collected to work with contractors for installation of septic systems. More information can be
found on ADPH's website.6

•	The Black Belt Unincorporated Wastewater Program (BBUWP) is a nonprofit program focused on onsite waste-
water management needs in Lowndes County. Various funding agencies support the program in providing new
septic systems at a very reduced cost. The upfront costs are currently $500 to $1,000 based on soil type at
household, plus an ongoing cost of $20 per month for maintenance.

•	USDA-RD's Single Family Housing Repair Loans and Grants program (also known as the Section 504 Home
Repair Program) provides loans to very-low-income homeowners to repair, improve, or modernize their homes.
It also provides grants to elderly, very-low-income homeowners to remove health and safety hazards.

•	The USDA Rural Decentralized Water Systems Grant program helps qualified nonprofits create a revolving
loan fund for eligible individuals who own and occupy a home in an eligible rural area (one with a population
of 50,000 or fewer). These revolving loan funds come in the form of low-interest loans. The maximum loan
amount is $15,000 at a 1 percent fixed interest rate, repaid over a 20-year period. The fund may be used to
construct, refurbish, or service individually owned septic systems.

Benefits of Investing in Adequate
Wastewater Infrastructure

Public and Community Health Improvement

Exposure to sewage can have negative health impacts and spread diseases such as salmonellosis, shigellosis,
cholera, giardiasis, amoebiasis, hepatitis A, viral enteritis, and other diarrheal diseases.7 There are many different
types of microbes in wastewater, which makes it challenging to determine specific causes of illness. Detecting and
identifying microbes in wastewater takes time and resources. However, it is well known that exposure to untreated
waste negatively affects residents' health and well-being. These issues are concern in White Hall, with studies8
noting evidence of fecal coliform in the groundwater aquifer and potential exposure of residents to pathogens and
viruses due to contact with raw sewage from failed septic systems.

6	https://www.alabamapublichealth.gov/environmental/septic-svstem-proqram.html

7	World Health Organization. (2006). WHO guidelines for the safe use of wastewater, excreta and greywater (Vol. 2).
https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9241546832

8	Kaushal, S., & Singh, J. S. (2017). Wastewater impact on human health and microorganism-mediated remediation and treatment through
technologies. In J. Singh & G. Seneviratne (Eds.), Agro-environmentalsustainability. Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49727-3 12

14

Options for Clean Water Solutions in White Hall, Alabama


-------
Investing in adequate wastewater infrastructure creates a healthier environment for the residents in White
Hall. Children can play outdoors, residents do not have to worry about their families and pets encountering
raw sewage, household plumbing is more functional, and odors of sewage are not persistently present.
Well-maintained and properly built wastewater treatment systems protect residents from viruses and bacteria.
They also reduce environmental pollution, function during rain and storms, and provide a foundation for economic
development.

Economic Impact of Wastewater Infrastructure Investment

Although the primary purpose of any wastewater system improvements is to address the sanitation conditions in
White Hall, developing wastewater systems can bring economic benefits and jobs for communities. The Economic
Benefits of Investing in Water Infrastructure study, commissioned by the Value of Water Campaign and completed
by the U.S. Water Alliance in 2017, found that for every $1 million spent on infrastructure construction, over 15 jobs
are generated. Town leaders in White Hall will want to consider school apprenticeship programs and other local
workforce development programs, including construction-related skills, to create local employment opportunities
for residents once construction-related activities begin.

Infrastructure can provide a strong foundation for the community through improved wastewater treatment and
health services for existing residents. The Town of White Hall's location between Montgomery and Selma could
make an attractive location for commercial and industrial businesses. New businesses can bring jobs to reduce
the number of residents who have to commute out of Lowndes County for work. Gravity sewers and centralized
treatment are the most flexible wastewater systems for economic development. However, they are also the most
expensive to build and maintain at first. Community systems can also be attractive to prospective businesses if the
design accounts for the expected flow.

Options 2, 3, and 4 in this document account for additional flow of 25,000 gallons per day, which is approximately
an additional 15 percent of capacity above existing needs. That flow would support an additional 80 homes or
limited commercial development and industrial facilities with offices on County Road 40 or Highway 80. A gravity
system with central treatment would allow service to neighboring communities in the future. It is important to
choose a system that reflects the community's current and future needs and goals. This choice will require
thoughtful consideration by town officials and community members.

Options for Clean Water Solutions in White Hall, Alabama

15


-------
Impact of Economic Growth on Monthly Rates

In Options 2, 3, and 4, an additional 25,000 gallons per day is included in the projected flows. This could accom-
modate about 80 more residential connections, and monthly bills per customer would be about $8 to $10 lower
per month than shown in Table 1 because more people would pay into the shared system. Once the town has
more information on economic growth options, a more detailed estimate of monthly costs can be developed.

Sustaining the Investment Through
Operations and Maintenance

White Hall Utilities will most likely maintain the wastewater infrastructure selected for the community, as they
already maintain the water system and the existing community wastewater treatment system on Freedom Road.

Potential Approaches for O&M

White Hall has options for providing O&M services to the community. These include:

•	Partnering with the BBUWP for onsite system management.

•	Hiring a lead wastewater operator through a consulting firm to provide certification until the town can hire or
train a staff member for the appropriate certification level.

Other ways to streamline O&M of potential systems include:

•	Using technology, such as remote monitoring and reporting, in community systems or a wastewater treatment
plant to help with O&M.

•	Financing purchase of equipment such as pumper trucks and sewer jetters through USDA-RD and ADEM
CWSRF programs.

Paying for O&M and the Affordability Challenge

Across the United States, utilities use sewer bills to pay for management, operations, maintenance, and loan
repayments for wastewater systems. The Town of White Hall will need to keep rates affordable for low-income
customers but high enough to collect funds to operate and maintain the system. This challenge is a key obstacle
for utilities across the United States. Traditionally, wastewater-only projects are considered "affordable" if the
sewer bill is 2 percent of MHI or less. However, using MHI as an indicator can make it challenging to understand
the community's affordability needs, since low-income residents struggle more with paying utility bills than higher-
income residents do. This analysis incorporates both household income quintile upper limits from the U.S. Census
Bureau and MHI into the affordability analysis to better reflect the impact for low-income residents. Even with
assistance from federal and state funding programs, all options will have a high financial impact on the lowest-
income residents of White Hall.

Table 2 and Table 3 give an overview of impact on White Hall households at various incomes. The highest income
level was not included since affordability needs focus on the lower income brackets. Option 1a is not included
because there would not be a monthly bill from the utility. In theory, Option 1a would have the similar costs as 1b
for the homeowners. Table 2 evaluates the percent of income that would be spent on different wastewater infra-
structure systems for only O&M costs in White Hall. Table 3 evaluates the percent of income that would be spent
on the wastewater system if there was a loan component, as in the options in Table 1. The lower the percentage of
income spent on sewer rates, the more affordable the system is to the customer.

16

Options for Clean Water Solutions in White Hall, Alabama


-------
Table 2. Percent of Household Income Spent on Sewer Rates in White Hall, Alabama (Considering
O&M Costs, 100 Percent Principal Forgiveness for Capital Costs)

Income Bracket

Estimated
Monthly
Bill

First
Income
Upper
Limits

Second
Income
Upper
Limits

Third
Income
Upper
Limits

Fourth
Income
Upper
Limits

MHI

Poverty
Level

Percent of White Hall
Households in Income
Bracket



0%-20%

20%-40%

40%-60%

60%-80%



31%

Annual Household
Income



$12,122

$26,608

$40,308

$46,760

$32,000

$35,801

1b. Onsite systems

$35

3.5%

1.6%

1.0%

0.9%

1.3%

1.2%

2. Community systems

$44

4.4%

2.0%

1.3%

1.1%

1.7%

1.5%

3. Onsite and community
systems

$35

3.5%

1.6%

1.0%

0.9%

1.3%

1.2%

4a. Sewer and lagoon
treatment

$50

4.9%

2.3%

1.5%

1.3%

1.9%

1.7%

4b. Sewer and advanced
treatment

$68

6.7%

3.1%

2.0%

1.7%

2.5%

2.3%

I Greater than 2% of MHI considered "high impact" to households based on the 2023 EPA Clean Water
J Act Financial Capability Assessment Guidance focused on Clean Water Act compliance cases.

Table 3. Percent of Household Income Spent on Sewer Rates in White Hall, Alabama (Considering
O&M Costs and Potential USDA-RD Loan Repayment Costs)

Income Bracket

Estimated
Monthly
Bill

First
Income
Upper
Limits

Second
Income
Upper
Limits

Third
Income
Upper
Limits

Fourth
Income
Upper
Limits

MHI

Poverty
Level

Percent of White Hall
Households in Income
Bracket



0%-20%

20%-40%

40%-60%

60%-80%



31%

Annual Household
Income



$12,122

$26,608

$40,308

$46,760

$32,000

$35,801

1b. Onsite systems

$63

6.2%

2.8%

1.9%

1.6%

2.4%

2.1%

2. Community systems

$108

10.7%

4.9%

3.2%

2.8%

4.1%

3.6%

3. Onsite and community
systems

$83

8.2%

3.7%

2.5%

2.1%

3.1%

2.8%

4a. Sewer and lagoon
treatment

$103

10.2%

4.6%

3.1%

2.6%

3.9%

3.5%

4b. Sewer and advanced
treatment

$121

12.0%

5.5%

3.6%

3.1%

4.5%

4.1%

l Greater than 2% of MHI considered "high impact" to households based on the 2023 EPA Clean Water
J Act Financial Capability Assessment Guidance focused on Clean Water Act compliance cases.

Options for Clean Water Solutions in White Hall, Alabama

17


-------
Addressing the Affordability Challenge

It is possible to lower the financial burden of these investments,
especially for low-income households. Some local communities
and states are developing affordability programs to provide
rate assistance to low-income customers. The Low Income
Household Water Assistance Program, created in response to
the COVID-19 pandemic, was the first program of its kind in the
United States, but it is only authorized by Congress through
2024. It is unclear whether Congress or the state of Alabama
will continue this program.

White Hall, like other local governments and utilities, can build
local affordability programs by charging different rates on
commercial accounts, new customers, or other customer bases
that incorporate funding for a local affordability program. This
creates a pot of money to help other customers during times
of need. Customers who have a temporary medical issue or
qualify for assistance based on income guidelines can take
advantage of this rate structure to pay for water and waste-
water service. However, this solution might not work if White
Hall does not have many commercial or industrial accounts to
pay extra to fund it.

Key Takeaways on Affordability

All wastewater treatment options have a
high financial impact on the lowest-income
residents of White Hall. Rate assistance
programs may be necessary for some
households in White Hall.

Loan repayments will cause any option to
have a high financial impact on residents
of White Hall. White Hall will need to work
with the funding agencies to maximize the
amount of grants for construction of their
system.

Economic growth can lower monthly costs
of central treatment systems; therefore,
the community should carefully weigh
multiple factors in deciding on a system.

The Town of White Hall will need multiple approaches to address the financial burden of water utilities for
low-income residents, beyond just the programs discussed above. For example, White Hall could consider
non-rate revenue opportunities such as leasing space on water towers or offering non-traditional services. These
could include providing construction services to new projects related to the utilities connections and charging for
the time, although this would require contract documents with the private sector.

Partners and Roles

The path to clean water is not an easy one. The Town of White Hall has many options to choose from when it
comes to new wastewater systems. Many partners in this pilot program will continue to support White Hall along
this journey (Figure 3), including:

•	U.S. Department of Agriculture Rural Development (USDA-RD):

Lead agency (with EPA) providing jointly leveraged technical assis-
tance resources in this pilot program. Funding partner.

•	U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Headquarters and
Region 4: Lead agency (with USDA) providing jointly leveraged
technical assistance resources in this pilot program.

•	Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM):

Agency providing funds through the Clean Water State Revolving
Fund (CWSRF) and the environmental permitting authority.

•	Alabama Department of Public Health (ADPH): Permitting
authority for onsite and community systems.

•	Alabama Rural Water Association (ARWA) and Communities
Unlimited: Association providing technical assistance.

•	The Kelley Group: Local engineering consultant that will conduct the
Sewer Feasibility Study.

Figure 3. Partners to White Hall.

18

Options for Clean Water Solutions in White Hall, Alabama


-------
Technical Assistance and Support for White Hall Moving Forward

Both EPA and USDA-RD fund technical assistance programs that support small, rural, and disadvantaged commu-
nities and help them navigate the CWSRF, Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF), and USDA-RD funding
programs. The ultimate goals of the technical assistance (WaterTA) programs are to help communities identify
water challenges and solutions, build capacity to address those needs, and develop application materials to
access water infrastructure funding. Technical assistance providers can help the Town of White Hall understand
the funding available through the SRF and USDA-RD programs, as well as deadlines and application requirements.
EPA WaterTA and USDA-RD TA can also assist with preparing and submitting funding applications. These
providers can offer advice as communities consider infrastructure options, financing, and rate structures. Their
connections with EPA and USDA-RD can help communities successfully complete projects and programs. Other
technical assistance support for White Hall can include:

•	Developing a wastewater rate program to build a local "affordability assistance" and asset management
program. White Hall could establish a rate program where new, commercial, or industrial customers contribute
to an affordability assistance program for low-income residents. EPA's network of Environmental Finance
Centers partners with technical assistance providers that specialize in these type of rate programs.

•	Supporting workforce development and staff training. White Hall Utilities will need operations staff for a new
system. The technical assistance providers have staff training programs available.

•	Engaging residents in the needs and benefits of a wastewater treatment system. Customers play a
large part in the success of a wastewater treatment system. Technical assistance providers can help with
engagement and education for residents on topics such as "What Not to Flush," "Management of Fats, Oils,
and Greases (FOG)," why having a wastewater system is important, and how to maintain a septic system.
Educational materials are available for residents.

More information can be found at EPA's WaterTA website.9

Road Map for Implementation

The Mayor of White Hall and local utility staff are considering how to address White Hall's wastewater treatment
needs, but this is just the beginning of the process. Developing wastewater infrastructure takes time. Creating
a holistic program to address septic system needs could take 2 or more years. These issues are not easy to
resolve, but the effort is worthwhile for the future of the community. Now is the best time in decades to act, as the
Bipartisan Infrastructure Law funds add a boost to water infrastructure across the United States. Over the next
year, the White Hall community will need to consider options and determine the best path for their future.

Immediate Next Steps Ongoing Through 2024

The Town of White Hall has applied for funding from ADEM and USDA-RD to complete a master plan for waste-
water needs in the community. The Kelley Group will complete the master plan process and assist the community
with selecting an alternative. ADEM has allotted a $450,000 grant and USDA-RD has awarded a $70,000 SEARCH
grant to develop the master plan, PER, and Environmental Information Document over the next 6 to 12 months.
Plan activities include:

• Collecting site-specific soil data for onsite/septic and community systems and conducting a topographic survey
to determine gravity sewer options and lift station needs.

9 https://www.e pa .q ov/wate rta

Options for Clean Water Solutions in White Hall, Alabama

19


-------
•	Evaluating site criteria for any treatment system and real estate needs for the treatment system and sewers, if
those options are selected.

•	Addressing permit requirements and submitting a waste load allocation to ADEM, if appropriate, for a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit for a treatment facility.

•	Developing cost estimates and modifying options based on site-specific data and wastewater flow projections.

•	Engaging with the community and town council to select a system option. Topics to consider include:

-	The future: how can this investment shape the next 20 years for the community?

-	Monthly bills:

» Do the grants and low-interest loans in the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law make monthly bills
affordable enough for the community?

» If not, are there programs like the Low Income Household Water Assistance Program that could
make them affordable?

-	If the town does not act now with the current funding, will it ever be able to act? How can the
community encourage action?

•	To be part of ADEM's 2024 SRF IUP that allocates the 2024 CWSRF proceeds, White Hall would need to submit
a competitive application of the selected alternative to ADEM by February 28, 2024.

Once White Hall decides on a wastewater option through the master planning process, the town will have to
design the system, acquire property, and get the necessary permits. Both USDA-RD and ADEM have funding
sources for design and construction through a competitive application process as described above. The amount of
funding from grants versus loans will need to be determined at the time of application(s).

Figure 4 shows two paths that White Hall can follow based on the alternative selected. In general, an onsite
systems approach should take less time to implement. With the implementation of an onsite system, there is more
than one opportunity for customers to connect, as indicated by the blue and red icons. A central treatment system
can take up to 5 years to implement, as detailed below.

Activities After Alternative Selection

ADEM Onsite

If Needed, Form
Responsible

Enabling Ordinances,
Organizational Needs,
and Ongoing O&M

Construction Start Operations = Ongoing
Customer Connect O&M

Figure 4. Roadmap for wastewater infrastructure options in White Hall.

20

Options for Clean Water Solutions in White Hall, Alabama


-------
Potential Timeline for Onsite/Septic System (Options 1 and 3)

If the community selects an onsite/septic component, it has several options to help residents purchase and install
systems, including:

•	Evaluate ADPH and BBUWP for applicability to meeting residents' needs and partner with either or both of
those programs to support residents' needs for new systems.

•	Seek support from ADEM for future funding through the CWSRF program.

•	Seek low-interest loans through USDA-RD's Decentralized Water Systems Program.

•	Evaluate USDA-RD's Section 504 Home Repair Program loans and grants to address health and safety hazards
for homeowners who qualify based on income requirements.

The ADPH and USDA-RD programs are set up to assist individual homeowners. ADEM is working on a program
that could include funding for a Responsible Management Entity that provides O&M, similar to the BBUWP (Figure
5). ADEM has not established these guidelines yet. EPA has guidance on its Septic System Management Program
and outreach material available on the SepticSmart webpage.10

1.	Evaluate ADPH and BBUWP for applicability to meeting residents' needs. If the programs are applicable,
connect residents with these programs so they can get new septic systems in place in a timely manner.

2.	Decide if additional support to residents is needed. If so,

a.	Develop a Responsible Management Entity to actively manage septic systems for residents. This entity
will need to develop ordinances and a financing program for the system.

b.	Establish ordinances and rate structures in the first part of 2024.

c.	Submit funding applications and arrange funding options for residents in early 2024.

d.	Determine staffing needs and hiring staff in mid-2024.

e.	Complete the system so customers can sign up for service in late 2024.

2023



2024

2025

2026

Funding Milestones

Applications for Planning and Design Grants
Applications for Construction Grants/Loans

Program Setup and Administration

Enabling Ordinances

Establish Proposed Rate Structures and

Financing Staff Needs

Staffing

Implementation

Permitting, Design, and Construction

Onsite Programs:

Administrative Establishment
Funding Applications
Implementation

Customers could sign up for service

Figure 5. Potential timeline to set up a Responsible Management Entity for onsite/septic systems.

10 https://www.epa.gov/septic/septicsmart

Options for Clean Water Solutions in White Hall, Alabama

21


-------
Potential Timeline for Sewers and Treatment Systems (Options 2,3,
and 4)

If White Hall chooses a central sewer or community sewer system, the project could take 3 to 5 years, depending
on the size of the system. Figure 6 shows a plan of action, which would include:

1.	Applying for design and construction funding from ADEM and USDA-RD in early 2024.

2.	Developing ordinances and rate structures and determining financial needs in early 2024.

3.	Designing and permitting the system. This will usually take 1.5 to 2 years, depending on size:

a.	Systems less than 15,000 gallons per day are permitted through ADPH.

b.	Systems greater than 15,000 gallons per day are permitted through ADEM and will require a waste load
allocation for a surface water discharge.

c.	Other permitting agencies for construction activities may include the Army Corps of Engineers, ADEM
for stormwater and dewatering activities, and the Alabama Department of Transportation if construction
occurs in state highways. The design engineer usually obtains these permits.

4.	Acquiring land for treatment systems and sewer easements. This usually happens at the same time as design
and permitting. It is important to note that the funding agencies will only fund acquisition from willing sellers.

5.	Applying for construction funding through ADEM and USDA-RD, once design is 90 percent complete and the
system is permitted.

Residents could expect to connect to the system for service in late 2027 or early 2028, depending on the system.

Funding Milestones

Applications for Planning and Design Grants
Applications for Construction Grants/Loans

2023

J

2024

2025

2026

2027

2028

Program Setup and Administration

Enabling Ordinances

Establish Proposed Rate Structures and

Financing Staff Needs

Staffing

Implementation

Permitting, Design, and Construction

Sewer and Treatment Systems:

Permitting and Design
ROW and Land Acquisition Needs
Construction
Connecting Customers

Customers could sign up
for service

Figure 6. Potential timeline for construction of sewer and treatment systems.

22

Options for Clean Water Solutions in White Hall, Alabama


-------
Concluding Thoughts

As the Town of White Hall moves forward with an in-depth analysis of its options for wastewater service, EPA and
USDA-RD staff and technical assistance providers are ready to support the community with funding opportunities
through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. This is a historic time for water infrastructure funding for small, rural
communities such as White Hall, Alabama. New funding can help the White Hall community address their current
and persistent health challenges, honor their heritage, protect their beautiful natural resources, and build a
prosperous future.

Definitions

Onsite/septic system. A traditional system includes a settling (septic) tank and drainfield. Advanced or
engineered systems can include aeration systems, chemical dosing, and a sand filtration system for the drainfield.

Community or cluster treatment system. A small wastewater treatment system of less than 15,000 gallons per
day with a drainfield for subsurface discharge. These systems are permitted through the ADPH. The treatment
system on Freedom Road is a community/cluster treatment system.

Responsible Management Entity (RME). Used as an overarching management approach to septic system
maintenance. The RME is responsible for installation, operations, and management of septic systems at individual
buildings, and replaces management by the property owner. The RME model is designed to provide a greater
level of assurance of septic system long-term performance. The RME usually collects a monthly or annual fee for
periodic maintenance of the septic system.

Gravity sewer system. A system that includes a sewer lateral connected to the house and sewer lines that flow by
gravity to pump station(s) that pump the flow to a treatment plant.

Septic tank effluent pump (STEP) sewer system (low-pressure sewer system). A sewer system with a septic
tank and pump at the customer's building. Effluent from the septic tank is pumped into a low-pressure sewer
system to a treatment facility. Septic tanks need to be pumped out periodically. This is usually the responsibility of
the utility.

Central wastewater treatment facility. A wastewater treatment system that is larger than 15,000 gallons per day
and permitted through ADEM. It usually has a surface water discharge permit to discharge treated water into a
river. Certified operating staff and monitoring is required for these systems.

Advanced wastewater treatment system. A treatment system using advanced technology to address nutrient
reduction or other water quality parameters prior to discharge to sensitive waterways. This can include a sand
filter treatment after secondary treatment or various side stream process to reduce nutrient levels in the effluent.

Options for Clean Water Solutions in White Hall, Alabama

23


-------
Limitations

Any systems and associated cost estimates discussed in this draft analysis are preliminary and not intended to
serve in lieu of a PER prepared by a professional engineer licensed in the relevant jurisdiction.

Alternatives have been developed at a high level with desktop tools and have not been informed with survey data
or fieid reconnaissance work. Further field evaluation is needed to verify these alternatives in subsequent work
following this assessment and solutions plan.

Treatment and dispersal systems designed by licensed design professionals are based on soil evaluations, flood
elevation evaluations and variances, permitted discharge limit determinations, and unforeseen factors that cannot
be determined without onsite field surveys and evaluations beyond the scope of this draft assessment.


-------