^eo srAr.

\5SS/

*1 PRO^

ADDENDUM
MIDLOTHIAN CUMULATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT

Center for Combustion Science and Eogmeering
Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region 6
Dallas, TX 75202

October 31,1997


-------

-------
In January 1996, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA)
published die Midlothian Cumulative Risk Assessment (Midlothian Risk Assessment)
Hot examined possible health risks associated with emissions from Chaparral Steel,
North Texas Cement, Texas Industries, and Hokum Texas, L, P. The conclusion of
the Midlothian Risk Assessment was that the available site data-stewed that potential
health risk were below levels of regulatory concern. However, the report also stated
that theoretical models indicated that there was a potential for noncancer health
effects; primarily from antimony emissions associated with Chaparral Steel Coaiptny-
Based on new data and revised calculations in this Addendum to the Midlothian Risk
Assessment; the first conclusion originally stated in the report should be revised to
read:

Neither available site data or conservative theoretical models show
that there are cancer risks or the potential for non-cancer health
effects above regulatory levels of concern.

The second original conclusion that theoretical potential health impacts above
regulatory levels of concern are due to Chaparral Steel is no longer correct based on
the change in the first conclusion. This change is warranted based on new data
submitted by Chaparral Steel that predicts much lower emission rates for antimony
than those originally estimated by EPA Region 6. As a part of the Midlothian Risk
Assessment, die USEPA made theoretical calculations that indicated that antimony
in electric arc furnace (EAF) dust from Chaparral Steel may be associated with
noncancer health risk. This cansed USEPA to look further at antimony concentrations
in water and soil in the Midlothian area. As a result of further study, the USEPA
concluded thai actual soil and water concentrations were much lower than the
concentrations predicted by the theoretical model.

In response to concerns identified by EPA in the Midlothian Risk Assessment,
Choanal Steel sampled and analyzed its emissions of antimony from the baghouses
and determined antimony concentrations in EAF dust In the Midlothian Risk
Assessment, without the benefit of this site-specific data, the USEPA assumed a value
for the concentration of antimony and calculated antimony emissions. Based on the
new antimony data, USEPA has concluded that the antimony emission rate assumed
in the Midlothian Risk Assessment for Chaparral Steel was too high. For this reason,
the theoretical calculations concerning antimony are revised in this addendum.

When the theoretical risk calculations for antimony are revised based on actual
antimony emissions and concentrations of antimony in EAF dust, the theoretical
exposures from Chaparral Steel do not pose a potential impact to human health. This
conclusion is consistent with that reached by USEPA with respect to the actual
measured concentrations of antimony in soil and water.

-I-


-------
introduction

The Midlothian Risk Assessment evaluates theoretical risks posed by releases of
constituents from the Chaparral Steel, North Texas Cement, Texas Industries, and
Holnam Texas, L. P. In the absence of specific information regarding concentrations
of constituents in emissions from these facilities, the IE5EPA made assumptions in
keeping with emissions profiles from similar facilities. The source of some of tins
information was a document entitled Detailed Surmaary of Information Collection
Request Responses For Electric Arc Furnace (EAF) NESHAP (RTI, 1993). This
document is referred to as the ICR in the Midlothian Risk Assessment

Out of 77 steel facilities surveyed in the ICR, only one reported an antimony
concentration in EAF dust Hie antimony concentration in EAF dust from die single
reporting steel facility was 0.52% or 5200 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) (or parts
per million, ppm). Because antimony emissions and antimony concentrations in EAF
dust from Chaparral Steel were not known prior to the publication of the Midlothian
Risk Assessment, the antimony concentration from Chaparral Steel emissions was
assumed to be the same as that found in EAF dust from the single facility reporting
antimony emissions in the ICR (5200 ppm).

In addition, in its August 1988 report entitled "Best Demonstrated Available
Technology (BOAT) Background Document for K061," USEPA found that the
concentration range for antimony in EAF dust (K061) was 5,03 ppm to 294 ppm.
These concentrations are also well below the 5200 ppm concentration assumed in the
Midlothian Risk Assessment EPA Region 6 chose the more conservative value of
5200 ppm because it felt that such conservatism was warranted given the overall lack
of data about the processes used by Chaparral Steel.

In the Midlothian Risk Assessment, the USEPA acknowledged the uncertainty
associated with estimation of emissions, indicating that: "The availability and quality
of chemical-specific emission rates presented one of the largest sources of uncertainty
associated with this screening level assessment " In the case of antimony, uncertainty
regarding emission rates resulted in calculated theoretical noncancer risks that are
considerably above what would be calculated using actual concentrations of antimony
in air, water, and soil. This disparity was illustrated in Section 5 of the Midlothian
Risk Assessment1

'Sorewii^itQncmccrMksgiOKd ly ingestion of predicted conccntjatkms of antimony in drinking wtterwere 3. TMi vafew
it slightly above the vtlue of I, indicating there may be * concern for potential noiKMieer effects. However, Mmpbt
oolectod Son As Miflothiui wafer supply by ihe Texas Nitural Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC) dad not detest
sntmxxry at sccmc^trstkm of0002 mg/L. If it is 
-------
To lessen the uncertainty regarding antimony emissions and risks calculated using the
ICR data, information regarding antimony emissions from Chaparral Steel baghouses
and antimony concentrations in EAF dusts is used to re-calculate risks associated with
theoretical human exposures to antimony in sir, water, and soil. These data are
discussed in detail below,

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this addendum is to respond to information regarding antimony
emissions from Chaparral Steel baghouses and antimony concentrations in EAF dusts
submitted by Chaparral Steel after the Midlothian Cumulative Risk Assessment was
finalized. This information slightly changes the conclusions of the report The
overall conclusion of die report—that cancer risks and the potential for noncancer
health effects are below regulatory levels of concern—remain unchanged. The
changes presented do not affect die EPA's decision about whether or not it should
effect some regulatoiy action above and beyond that undertaken by Texas in the State
peroiitting process.

EVALUATION OF NEW DATA CONCERNING CONCENTRATIONS OF
ANTIMONY IN FACILITY EMISSIONS

The best available information was used to estimate antimony emissions. These
emission estimates have been used in recalculating risks. Fugitive emissions were
calculated using total particulate fugitive emissions presented in die 1995 emissions
inventory estimates for the "A" and "B" furnaces, together with the 95% upper
confidence limit (95% UCL) of the arithmetic mean antimony concentration for
Chaparral EAF dust EAF dust antimony data used to calculated the 95% UCL are
presented in Tables 1 and 2. Additional EAF data not used in these calculations are
presented in Table 3J . The data from Tables 1 and 2 were subjected to quality
assurance-quality control procedures. The 95% UCL antimony concentration
calculated from these data was 84.0 ppm. This value was calculated in accordance

* EAF dttJt antimony data pnaentcd in TaMe I ire from six EAF dust samples obtained by Chaparral on January 28 Amfb
Februarys, 19%. The laboratory report! for these analyses are attached to this addendum (Attachment B).

Data presented h Tabic 2 aretheremtti of antimony analyses orthree EAF dust aampica obtained during the mm* etWHcm
aurvty conducted by METCOEnvirociniciital in Januaiy and February 1996. During this survey, one sample of EAF dust was
obtained from each of the "A»* "B," and "C" baghouses. The laboratory report! for these analyses are attached to 1his
addendum (Attachment C).

Table 3 present* the results of analyses perforated in February 1996 of EAF dust digestate iimples that had (Men retained as
part ofCbapml'i ongoing dust analyBa program. At the request of CHapamt, Maxim Technologies, Inc. analyzed archived
dtgerfafc samples for antimony. Since the request came afar initial sampte preparation, routine quality assurance/quality control
(QA/QC) analyse! could not be performed, These data do, however, provide an indication of the general range of antimony
concentration found in Chaparral'j EAF dost, md are coniitent with data used for the 95% UCL calculations.

-3-


-------
with USEPA guidance presented In Supplemental Guidance to RAGS: Calculating die
Concentration Term (USEPA, 1992).

Stack antimony emissions for Baghouses B and C used hi these revised risk
calculations were measured by METCO Environmental (METCO) daring stack
sampling conducted as part of a source emissions survey in January-February 1996.
Baghouse A antimony emissions were calculated using data also obtained by METCO
for inlet flow rates for Baghouse A, Baghouse B stack flow rates, and actual measured
Baghouse B antimony emissions. Stack emission rates for antimony are presented in.
Table 4.

The fugitive, stack, and total (i.e., fugitive + stack) antimony emissions -values 0k
g/sec) obtained in the manner described above are lower than those used by Region
6 in their January 1996 Midlothian Risk Assessment report A comparison of these
emissions values is presented in Table 4.

A more detailed description of the basis for antimony emissions used in this revised
risk assessment are presented below in Attachment A.

REVISED RISK CALCULATIONS FOR ANTIMONY EXPOSURE

Due to the disparity in the measured antimony emissions and antimony concentrations
in EAF dust versus the concentration assumed in the Midlothian Risk Assessment, the
risks posed by antimony exposure have been revised. With the exception of
Chaparral Steel's antimony emissions, all exposure and risk assessment assumptions
from the Midlothian Risk Assessment are used in the revised risk calculations. The
revised risk assessment calculations resulting from the use of more certain estimates
of antimony emissions and EAF concentrations from Chaparral Steel are presented,
in Table 5.

As presented in Table 5, the hazard indices re-calculated using the Chaparral Steef
antimony data are below one. This indicates that the hypothetical adult resident, child
resident, farmer, and fisherman in the SCS and Joe Pool Lake watersheds are not
predicted to experience any adverse health effects as a result of exposure to modeled
concentrations of antimony in air, water, and soil resulting from emissions from
Chaparral Steel, North Texas Cement Company, Texas Industries, and Holnam Texas,


-------
According to the revised calculations presented in this addendum, the conclusions
presented in Section 5 of the Midlothian Risk Assessment are revised to state that

Neither available site data or conservative theoretical models show
that there are cancer risks or the potential for non-cancer health
effects above regulatory levels of concern,

REFERENCE

USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) 1992. Supplemental
Ouidance to RAGS: Calculating die Concentration Tenn. Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response. PB92-963373. May 1992,

-s-


-------
Table 1

Antimony Concentrations in Chaparral EAF Dust
Sampled on January 28 - February 8,1996





Antimony (mg/ke)

01A



64.6

02A



68.0

03A



50.5

04A



54.0

05A



50.7

06A



81.9



Table 2

Antimony Concentrations in Chaparral EAF Dust
Sampled by METCO in February, 1996



¦



Bagbouse A
BaghouseB
Baghoroe C

89.2
55.7
107.0


-------
Table 3

Antimony Concentrations in Chaparral Steel EAJF Dust

)btained from Arch

ived Digestate Samples

fl.mnl.Nfi.





59.1

43.2

03A

<20

04A

44.2

05A

39,7

06A

29.9

07A

44,2

08A

34.6

09A

32.7

10A

33.3

11A

<20

12A

33.4

13A

69.8

14A

<20

15A

<20

16A

<20

17A

<20

ISA

<20

19A

<20

20A

<20

21A

<20

22A

35.1

23A

33.5

24A

23.8

25A

30.9

26A

29,2

27A

30.5

28A

43.6

29A

47,5

30A

26.6

31A

43.8

T?A

11 7

.7.


-------
Table 4

Antimony Emissions for Chaparral Steel Company

:-^S^ioriifSoor«f;;vi





Fugitives

0,000061

0.0098

Bagliouse A

0.00021

0.0032

BaghouseB

0.00038

0.0081

BaghouseC

0.00038

0.0086

Total

0.0010

0.030

Tables

Revised Bisk Assessment Calculations for Antimony Exposure*

vf.'JCC^^ ijtOr?" • ; V:-'



Adult Resident

0.02 (3)

0.02 (3)

0.02 (3)

Child Resident

0.039 (6)

0.039 (6)

0.039 m

Farmer

0.02 (3)

0.02 0)

0.026 (4)

Fisherman, SCS
Lake Watershed

0.02 (3)

0.02 {3>

0.02 (3)

Fisherman, Joe Pool
Lake Watershed

0.02 (3)

0.02 (3)

0.02 (3)

* For comparison, the hazard index calculated in the January 31, 1996 USEPA risk
assessment is shown in parenthesis

-8-


-------
Attachment A

Antimony Emissions Calculations for Chaparral Steel Company


-------
Attachment A

Antimony Emissions Calculations for Chaparral Steel Company

1)	Total Antimony (Sb) emissions *¦ total fugitive emissions + baghouse (BH) "A"

BH UB" emissions+BH "C" emissions

2)	Fhy^jw*0.00021 gm/t

4)

5)

» 0.003 lbs/hr
**0,00038 gm/s

-0.003 lbs/hr
-0.00038 gm/s

6) Total Sh Emissions

- 0.000061 + 0,00021 + 0.00038 + 0.00038 gm/s
= 0.001 gm/i
References

1.	Revised Chaparral Steel Emissions Inveotoiy for 1995.

2.	METCO Environmental. Source Emissions Survey of Chaparral Stcei Company,

-1-


-------
Texas, Volume 1. Jamauy and Februwy, 1996.


-------

-------
Attachment B
Laboratory Report for Table 1 EAF Dust Analyses


-------
MAXIM

TECHNOLOGIES INC

2S7S Lane Stir Drive P.O. Box 224227 • Dallas, Texas 75222 * 21*-43t-270O

Client Jerry Balbo

Chaparral Steel
300 Ward Read
Midlothian, TX 76065

Client Bo. t54430r
¦eport Wa. D6-02-04T
Report Data 02/2U9& t5:Z»

Project EAF Dust

Phone: 214-299-5212 Fax: ZIW7S-2taZ

Date Sampled 01/28/96 02/08/96
Saaple Type Sol td	

Sanpled By Client

Transported by Bob Barrett

P.O. # CT-145-96

Date Received 02/09/%

SPECIAL REPORT FOR ANTIMONY ONLY • REPORT FOR OTHER EAF DUST
METALS RESULTS U1LL F0LL0U WHEN COMPLETED.

Lab No.

D6-02-047-01
06-02-047-02
D6-02-047-03
D6-02-047-04
06-02-047-05
06-02-047-06

Saaole Identification
RC 301625
RC 301769
RC 301646
RC 301727
RC 301762
RC 301673

Our letters and reports are for the exclusive use of the
client to whoa they are addressed and shall not be reproduced
except in full without the approval of the testing laboratory.
The use of our name must receive our prior written approval.

MAXIM



.	.lid ¦	I mi I !!!¦ ¦ I-	i	Til	— .1

Reviewed' By	r

Uilliaa J (Use, &4>ervii


-------
Order * D6-O2-047
02/21/96 15:21
Client: Chaparral Steel

•test results «t sample

MgtZori

Sample: 01* RC 30162S

PW

Antimony
Cadalua Oxide
Calcium Oxide
Digestfoo of Dust
Iron Oxide
Lead Oxide
Lots en Ignition
MagnetI ui Oxide
Zinc Oxide

Sample: 02A RC 301769

Teat Maw
Antimony
Cadaiua Oxide
Calciua Oxide
Digestion of Dust
Iron Oxide
Lead Oxide
Loss on Ignition
Hagnesiui Oxide
Zinc Oxide

Sample: 03A RC 301646

Teat Mame
Antianny
Cadaiua Oxide
Calciua Oxide
Digestion of Oust
Iron Oxide
Lead Oxide
Loss on Ignition
Magnesiia Oxide
Zinc Oxide

Collected* 01/28/96	tot«—ma S

vtiKtfm oek

Method

Result

units

Limit

Started-



SU844-6010A

64.6

¦a/kg

10'

02/15/96

TAH

SU844-7130

0.0608

X

a.at

02/20/96

TAW

SU846-7140

7.09

X

a. at

I

9

TAN

SU846-3050A

02/14/96

Oat* Cbb





cm

SU846-7380

40.0

X

aura

a&zo/M

TAN

SU846-7420

2.35

X

0.01

02/20/96

TAH

EPA 160.4

3.8

X

0.01

02/17/96

mi

SU846-7460

3.12

X

0.01

02/19/96

TAH

SU846-7950

22.9

X

a.at

02/20/96

tJM

Collected: 02/01/96	Category: S

Detection 2US

iisiM

Result

units

Hilt



SU846-6010A

68.0

ng/lcg

10

02/15/96

TAH

SU846-7130

0.0683

X

0.01

02/20/96

TAN

SU846-7140

5.67

X

0.01

02/13/96

TMt

SU846-3050A

02/14/96

Date Ccai





cm

SU846-7380

34.8

X

O.OT

ozyzom

TAH

SU846-7420

3.21

X

0.01

02/20/96

TW*

EPA 160.4

3.2

X

0.01

02/17/96

KU

SU846-7460

2.89

X

0.01

02/19/96

TAH

SU846-7950

29.4

X

0.01

02/20/96

TMt

Collected: 02/03/96	Category: S

Detection Detr

Method

Result

Uhits

Limit

s^rW

Analyst-

SU846-601QA

50.5

¦O/kg

10

02/15/96

TAH

SU846-7130

0.0625

X

0.01

02/20/96

TAH

SU846-7140

4.94

X

0.01

02/19/96

TAR

SU846-3050A

02/14/96

Date Coai





cm

SU846-7380

31.9

X

O.OT

0Z/20/96

TAR

SU846-7420

2.44

X

0.01

02/20/96

TAH

EPA 160.4

3.8

X

0.01

02/17/96

HOI

SU846-7460

2.71

X

0.01

02/19/96

TAR

SU846-7950

32.4

X

0.01

02/20/96

TAH


-------
order « 06-02-047
02/21/96 15:21
Ctfcnt: Chaparral Steel

Test HESJirS BY SAMPLE

¦DllrfS

Staple: 04A RC 301727

Collects*- 88/04/96

Cttagori

it r













TWt JBS

Method

Result Chits

LlalC



Analyst-

Antlaony

SU846-«10A

54.0 «g/k|

to

02/15/96

m

Cadalua Qxfdt

SU846*7!30

0.0682 X

0.0t

02/20/96

TW

Calclui Oxide

SU846-7140

4.10 X

OJIt

02/19/96

nm

Digestion of Dust

SU846-305M

02/16/96 Date Co*





OK

Iron Oxide

SUB46-7380

34.7 X

®.0t

02/20/96

TDK

Lead Oxide

SU846-7420

2.65 X

1.01

02/20/96

TM

Loss on Ignition

EPA 160.4

3.4 X

0.01

02/17/96

•ou

Magnesiui Oxide

SW846-7460

2.05 X

0.01

02/19/96

nw

Zinc Oxide

SU846-7950

32.4 X

0-01

02/20/96

TM»

Saaple: 05A RC 301762

Collected: 02/06/96

Category* t









Oeteetfen 0»t»



Test Mine

Method

Result Units

Lieii

Stirted-

tea teK

Antiaony

SU846-6010A

50.7 ag/kg

10

02/15/96

TAN.

Cadatua Oxide .

SU846-7130

0.0612 X

0.0T

02/20/96

TA*

Calciia Qxfdt

SU846-7140

3.67 X

0.01

•2/19/96

TUt

Digestion of Duet

SU846-3050A

02/14/96 Oate Com





CVM

Iron Oxide

SU846-7380

27.9 X

0.01

•2/20/96

rm

Lead Oxide

SU846-7420

2.24 X

0.01

02/20/96

TAM

Loss on Ignition

EPA 160.4

3.5 X

0.01

02/17/96

nou

Magnesiiai Oxide

SW8A6-7460

2.23 X

0.01

02/19/96

TAM

Zinc Oxide

SV8A6-7950

38.7 X

0.01

•2/20/96

IAN ~

Staple: 06A RC 301673	Collected: 02/08/96	Category: t

Detection Oat*

Teft »m

Method

Result

Units

Uaii

Started

Has

Antiaony

SU846-6010A

81.9

¦g/kg

10

02/15/96

TAN

Cadiiw Oxide

SU846-7130

0.0732

X

0.01

02/20/96

TAR

Calciui Oxide

SU846-7140

4.14

X

0.01

02/19/96

TAM

Digestion of Dust

SU846-3050A

02/14/96

Date Coa





cm

Iron Oxide

SU846-7380

34.1

X

0.01

02/20/96

TAM

Lead Oxide

SU846-7420

2.77

X

0.01

02/20/96

rm

Loss an Ignition

EPA 160.4

3.5

X

0.01

02/17/96

¦OU

Magnesiue Oxide

SU846-7460

2.24

X

0.01

02/19/96

tM

Zlne Oxide

SU846-79S0

31.1

X

0.01

02/20/96

rm


-------
QUALITY ASSURANCE / QUALITY CONTROL TOTAL KETALS

Report No. D60204?

ANALYSIS	PARAMETER	RESULTS

Cat blank 1	Antimony	<0.1

Cat blank 2 Antimony	<0.1

Prep blank	Antlnony	<0.1

ANALY8I8 PARAMETERS RESULTS %
ICC	MiSwonr	100

ANALY81S	PARAMETER	RESULTS*

ICV	Antimony	93

ICS 1	Antlncny	89

CCV	Ant lawny	103

ICS 2	Antinony	102

ANALY3I3 PARAMETER RESULTS %
ICS	Antimony	102

Antloony	105

tCV > Initial Calibration Verification ~ op - 10*

ICS -Interference Check Standard I CP OKJ.T ~ or - 20*

ICS -laboratory Control Standard ~ or - 20* and or • 30* Silver and Antlanny

ICC ¦ Initial Calibration Check ICP OHU ~ or - 5X

Blank • « Detection Liiatt RPD • Relative Percent Pifferene* <20*

r>s* i of i


-------
Attachment C

Laboratory Report for METCO Baghouse Dust Samples (Table 5)


-------
SOURCE EMISSIONS SURVEY
OF

CHAPARRAL STEEL COMPANY
MIDLOTHIAN, TEXAS
VOLUME II

JANUARY AND FEBRUARY 1996

FILE NUMBER 96-15


-------
Job #96-155

Client Chapanai Steel

Location Midlothian, IX

UNIT Baghouse Dust
DATE 2-16-86

Sample

A Baghouse Dust

B Baghouse Dust

m

I

N)

O

C Baghouse Dust

Sb	As	Cd

mg/Kg	mg/Kg	mg/Kg

692	146	734

55.7	108	556

107	134	735

Cr Cu Fe

mg/Kg mg/Kg mg/Kg

795 1,720 154,000

*

861 1530 133,000
1,710 2,700 213,000

Pb	Mn	Hg

mg/Kg	mg/Kg	mg/Kg

22,500	20,300	13.9

18,200	19,500	I5T.H

26,100	24,600	1.4

Mo Nl Zn
mg/Kg mg/Kg mg/Kg

<27.9	299	163,000

48 287	128,000

33.5	172	228,000

f


-------
m

Ross Analytical Services, Inc.

164.13 Foltz Industrial Parkway ' Slrongsvillc. Ohio 44136
016) 572-3200 • Fa* (216) 572-7620 • 1-800-325-7737

CKRTIFICATg OP ANALYSIS

Environmental'	Work Order #: 96-02-036

Dooley Road	Client Code: METCO

b, TX 75244	Report Date: 02/15/96

Work ID: Multi-metals Trains
Hanoch Toren	Date Received: 02/08/96

I

SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION

Sample





Lab

Sample

DescriDtion





Number

Descriotion

Composite B Baghouse

Run

1

02

Composite B Baghouse Run 2

Composite B Baghouse

Run

3

04

Composite B Baghouse Blank

Composite C Baghouse

Run

1

06

Composite C Baghouse Run 2

Composite C Baghouse

Run

3

08

Composite C Baghouse Blank

Audit Filter





10

A Baghouse Dust

B Baghouse Dust





12

C Baghouse Dust

Data are reported on an as-received basis unless stated other-
wise. Estimated Quantitation Limits (EQL's) are listed £or
most analytes. EQL's are the lowest concentrations that can
be reliably measured under routine laboratory conditions.
Unless otherwise noted, method blanks had no targets found
above their EQL's and results were not corrected for blanks.

E-21


-------
Ross Analytical Services, Inc.

I MM Foliz Industrial Parkway • Sirongsvillc, Ohio 44136
(216) 572-320H' Eax. 1216) 572-7620 • I -800-323-7737

CERTIFICATE OP ANALYSIS

ent:

co Environmental
15 Dooley Road
las, TX 75244

n: Hanoch Toren

Work Order *: 96-02-037
Client Codei METCO
Report Date: 02/15/9S
Work 10: Multi-metals Trains
Date Received: 02/08/96

SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION



Sample
Description

Lab

Number



Sample
Description

KMn04

B

Baghouse

Run l

02

HCl

B Baghouse Run 1

KMn04

B

Baghouse

Run 2
Run 3,;

04

HCl

B Baghouse Run 2

KMn04

B

Baghouse

06

HCl

B Baghouse Run 3

KMn04

B

Baghouse

Blank

08

HCl

B Baghouse Blank

KMn04

C

Baghouse

Run l

10

HCl

C Baghouse Run 1

KMn04

C

Baghouse

Run 2

12

HCl

C Baghouse Run 2

KMO04

c

Baghouse

Run 3

14

HCl

C Baghouse Run 3

KMn04

c

Baghouse

Blank ¦*

16

HCl

C Baghouse Blank

Data are reported on an as-received basis unless stated other-
wise. Estimated Quantitation Limits (EQL's) are listed for
most analytes. EQL's are the lowest concentrations that can
be reliably measured under routine laboratory conditions.
Unless otherwise noted, method blanks had no targets found
above their BQL's and results were not corrected for blanks.

approved by
luler

E-22


-------
tfork Order * 96-02-036,037

Ross Analytical Serrieee, Insr

000004

aaported: 02/15/SS

103

/9G

TEST MKTHnnmf.nnTiB;

fercury was determined in aqueous samples and leachates by cold vapor atomic
ibsorption after acid/permanganate digestion as in EPA Methods 245.X and 7470A.
I single analysis was performed unless otherwise noted.

Multi-metals train" samples were prepared for analysis according to
'Methodology for the Determination of Metals Emissions in Exhaust Gases from
[azardous Waste Incineration and Similar Combustion Processes", 40 CFR 265,
tppendix IX, Section 3.1. Prepared samples were analyzed by Inductively Coupled
'lasma Emission Spectroscopy (XCP) as in EPA Method 6010A, unless otherwise
toted.	/

ietals were determined in solid and non-aqueous liquid samples by digestion with
dtric acid, hydrogen peroxide, and hydrochloric acid as in EPA Method 3050A,
ollowed by Inductively Coupled Plasma Emission Spectroscopy as in EPA Method
010A, unless noted otherwise.

lercury was determined in solid and non-aqueous liquid samples by cold vapor
tomic absorption after acid/permanganate digestion as in EPA Methods 245.5 and
471A. A .single analysis was performed unless otherwise noted.

ercury was determined in aqueous samples and leachates by cold vapor atomic
bsorption after acid/permanganate digestion as in EPA Methods 245.1 and 7470A.
single analysis was performed unless otherwise noted.

E-24

E-23


-------
>rk Order # 96-02-036

Ross Analytical Services. Inc

000005

Reported: 02/15/SS

imple volume

ib

Ho. DascriDtion



tftilts

SOS

.D

HN03 FW B Baghouse Run 1

110

Total mL

5

LE

Imps. BH B Baghouse Run 1

463

Total nL

S

ID

HN03 FW B Baghouse Run 2

113

Total mli

5

!H

Imps. BH B Baghouse Run 2

455

Total mli

5

ID

HN03 FW B Baghouse Run 3

105

Total mli

5

IB

Imps. BH B Baghouse Run 3

445

Total mL

5

LD

HN03 FW B Baghouse Blank

110

Total ml>

5

LE

Imps. BH B Baghouse Blank

295

Total ml>

5

;d

HN03 FW C Baghouse Run 1

108

Total mL

5

;e

Imps. BH C Baghouse Run 1

445

Total ml>

5

>D

HN03 FW c Baghouse Run 2

88

Total ml>

5

>'E

Imps. BH C Baghouse Run 2

445

Total mL

5

7D

HN03 FW C Baghouse Run 3

107

Total mL

5

7B

Imps. BH C Baghouse Run 3

480

Total mL

5

3D

HN03 FW C Baghouse Blk

95

Total mL

5

)E

Imps. BH C Baghouse Blank

390

Total mL

5

E-2S


-------
>rk Order # 96-02-037

Robs Analytical Services. Znc

000006

Reportedt 02/15/9S"

mple volume

b No.

Smml« DescriDtion

Result

units

BOS

A

KMn04

B Baghouse Run 1

187

total

mL

5

A

HC1 B

Baghouse Run 1

415

Total

mL

5

A

KMn04

B Baghouse Run 2

390

Total

mL

5

A

HC1 B

Baghouse Run 2

225

Total

mL

5



KMn04

B Baghouse Run 3

387

Total

mL

5



HC1 B

Baghouse Run 3

218

Total

mL

S



KMn04

B Baghouse Blank

385

Total

mL

. 5



HC1 B

Baghouse Blank

220

Total

mL

5

I

KMn04

C Baghouse Run 1

385

Total

mL

5

I

HC1 C

Baghouse Run 1

225

Total

mT.

5

L

KMn04

C Baghouse Run 2

390

Total

mL

S



HC1 C

Baghouse Run 2

240

Total

mL

S



KMn04

C Baghouse Run 3

400

Total

mL

5



HC1 C

Baghouse Run 3

200

Total

mL

5



KMn04

C Baghouse Blank

* 380

Total

mL

5



HC1 C

Baghouse Blank

222

Total

mL

5

E-26


-------
U.S. EPA - CLP	OOOOOY

COVER PAGE - INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA PACKAGE

lame: ROSS ANALYTICAL SERVICES

;ode: ROSS	

to.

ILM03

Case No.



EPA Sample No.

ABAGDUST	

ABAGDUSTD
—ABAGDUSTSC

"ABAGDUSTS	

AUDIT	

~BBAGBLK
BBAGDPST

BBAGELl	

BBAGR2	

BBAGR2P
BBAGR2SD
~BBAGR2S
~~BBAGR3
CBAGBLK
CBAGDUST
"CBAGRl
CBAGR2
CBAGR2D

CBAGR2SD
"CBAGR2S ~

Contract: METCO

SAS No.:

SDG No.:BAGHOa

Lab Sample ID

02-036-10A
~02-036-10A"^S

02-036-10A-SD
"02-036-10A-S
02-036-09A
02-036-04A
02-036-11A

"02-036-01A

"02-036-02A

"02-036-02A^15

"02-036-02A-SE

"02-036-02A-S

"02-036-03A

"02-036-08A

"02-036-12A

"02-036-05A	

02-036-06A
"02-036-06A"=T5
"02-036-06A-SD
"02-036-06A-S

I CP interelement corrections applied ?

I CP background corrections applied ?
If yes - were raw data generated before
application of background corrections ?

Yes/No YES
Yes/No YES
Yes/No NO

snts:

tify that this data package is in compliance with the terms and
tions of the contract, both technically and for completeness, for
• than the conditions detailed above. Release of the data contained
Lis hardcopy data package and in the computer-readable data submitted
oppy diskette' has been authorized by the Laboratory Manager or the

er

ture:



the



following signature.

T7 <&ciuAjvr'

Name:

Title:





COVER PAGE - IN

ILM02.1

E-27


-------
U.S. EPA - CLP

000013

INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET

EPA SAMPLE NO.

Name: ROSS_ANALYTICAL_SERVICES

Code: ROSS		Case No.:

rix (soil/water): S0IL_
il (low/med):	LOW

>lids:	10 OUT

Contract: METCO
SAS No.:

	 SDG Mo.: BAGHOU

Lab Sample ID: 02-036-1QA.
Date Received: 02/08/96

Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KC3

: Before:
r After:

CAS No.

Analyte

Concentration

C

Q

M

7429-90-5

Aluminum



E



MR

744CV-36-0
7440-38-2

Antimony

89.2

N

P

Arsenic

146

B

N

P

7440-39-3

Barium







Nft

7440-41-7

Beryllium







NR

7440-69-9

Bismuth







NR

7440-43-9

Cadmium

734





P

7440-70-2

Calcium







NR

7440-47-3

Chromium

fdS





P

7440-48-4

Cobalt







Nft

7440-50-8

Copper

1720





P

7439-89-6

Iron

154000





P

7439-92-1

Lead

22500





P

7439-93-2

Lithium







Nk

7439-95-4

Magnesium







NR

7439-96-5

Manganese

20300





P

7439-97-6

Mercury

13.9





CV

7439-98-7

Molybdenu
Nickel

27.9

0



P

7440-02-0

299





P

7440-09-7

Potassium







Nft

7782-49-2

Selenium







NR

7440-22-4

Silver







NR

7440-23-5

Sodium







NR

7440-28-0

Thallium







NR

7440-31-5

Tin .







NR

7440-62-2

Vanadium







NR

7440-66-6

Zinc

163000





P









































































Clarity Before:
Clarity After:

Texture:
Artifacts:

ints:

FORM I - IN	ILM02.L

E-39


-------
000020


-------
000023.

U.S. EPA - CLP

i	an* arnns no.

INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET

lame: ROSS_ANALYTICAL_SERVICES_ Contract: METOO
:ode: ROSS	Case No. : 	 SAS No.

CBAGDUST



			 SDG No.

.x (soil/water): S0IL_	Lab Sample ID: 02-036-12A

. (low/med):	LOW	Date Received: 02/08/96

.ids:	100.0

Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight) : MG/KG

CAS No.

Analyte

Concentration

C

Q

M

7429-90-5

Aluminum



5



tut

7440-56-0

Antimony

16?

H

p

7440-38-2

Arsenic

134

B

N

p

7440-39-3

Barium







Nfe

7440-41-7

Beryllium







NR

7440-69-9

Bismuth







MR

7440-43-9

Cadmium

735





P

7440-70-2

Calcium







Nft

7440-47-3

Chromium

1710





P

7440-48-4

Cobalt







nK

7440-50-8

Copper

2700





P

7439-89-6

Iron

213000





P

7439-92-1

Lead

26100





P

7439-93-2

Lithium







Nk

7439-95-4

Magnesium







NR

7439-96-5

Manganese

24800





P

7439-97-6

Mercury

1.4

5



CV

7439-98-7

Molybdenu
Nickel

33.5



P

7440-02-0

172





P

7440-09-7

Potassium







Nft

7782-49-2

Selenium







NR

7440-22-4

Silver







NR

7440-23-5

Sodium







NR

7440-28-0

Thallium







NR

7440-31-5

Tin







NR

7440-62-2

Vanadium







NR

7440-66-6

Zinc

228000





P









































































c Before: 		Clarity Be£ore: 		Texture:

c After: 		Clarity After: 		Artifacts:

ants:

FORM I - IN	ILM02.L

E-41


-------
U.S. EPA - CLP	000038

2A

INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

Fame: ROSS_ANALYTICAL_SERVICES_	Contracts METCO	

tode: ROSS	Case No.: 	 SAS No.: 	 SDG No.; BACaOH

al Calibration Source: PLASMA CHEM
nuing Calibration Source: PLASMA CHEM_

Concentration Units: ug/L

yte

Initial Calibration
True Found %R(1)

Continuing Calibration
True Found *R (1) Found

1 M

m

p
p~

m

NR
NR
P

m

p

m

p

p-
P~ :
Nff
NR
P

C?

P

P

MS
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
P

inum
mony_
nic
um

Ilium

uth	

ium
ium
miura
It ~
er	

















5000.0
~5000.0

5342.31
_4965.36

106.8
_99.3

10000.0
_10000.0

10376.39
_9686.68

103.8
_96.9

10205.13
10158.67

102.1
101.6

































500.0

	S20.22

104.0

	1000.0

JL011.54

101.2

	995.47

_>5.5

	1000.0

_1037.39

103.7

	2000.0

_202d.6$

101.5

_1992.91

_99 .6

1000.0

"Toooo.o

~ 5000.0

1030.90
X0586.94
_5177.05

103.1
105.9
103.5

2000.0
"50000.0
JLOOOO.O

2012.S7
51065.06
10051.36

100.6
105.3
100.5

1965.08
50531.04
_9870.73

56.3
102.7
_98.7



ium

esium

anese

ury

bdenu

al^	

9sium
ciium

5r	

am	

Lium_

















500.0
2.0

512.81
2.06

102.6
103.0
104.9
105.2

1000 .0
5.0

1005.27
5.37

100.5
107.4

104.6
102.0

981.08
5.53

.1
110.6
102.2
_99.5

-1000.0
	1000.0

1049.38
_1052.30

2000.0
	2000.0

20dl.67
_2040.16

2044.09
"1990.92

















































































iium_

















	1600.6

	£6S.O2



	2000.0

_1965.43

_96.3

_2050.28

102.5





































































































Tontrol Limits: Mercury 80-120; Other Metals 90-110; Cyanide 85-115

FORM II (PART 1) - IN	ILK02.1

E-58


-------
U.S. EPA - CLP	000039

2A

INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

trae: ROSS ANALYTICAL SERVICES	Contract: METCO

>de: ROSS	Case No.: 	 SAS No.: 	 SDG No.r BAGHDU

il Calibration Source: PLASMA CHEM
luing Calibration Source: PLASMA CHEM,

Concentration Units: ug/L

yte

Initial! Calibration
True Found *R(1)

Continuing Calibration
True Found VR(1) Found *R(1)



M

mc

p

p~
UK
NR
NR
P

NR
P

nK

p

p"
p"~

m

NR
P

CST

P

P~

NR

NR

NR

NR

MR

MR

MR

P_

inum_
nony

nic	

am

Ilium

uth

ium

ium

mium

It ~

er	























10000.6
_10000.0

10237.21
_9963.17

102.4
_99.6











_9512.26

_95 .1













































	1000.0

	994.67

_99.5





















	2000.6

_2009.29

100.5





















2000.0
"50000.0
JLOOOO.O

1979.97
70714.26
_9889.37

99.0
103.6
_98.9



























dura

esiutn

anese

:ury

-bdenu

:el^	

issium
mium

rer	

,um

.lium_

































1666.6
5.0

984.0b
5.17
2053.87
_1998.19

98.4
T03.4
102.7
_99.9





2.0

2.10

105.0

5.31

106.2





2000.0
	2000.0







































































































idium_

«

•

















•





	2000.0

_1991.8b

__99.6

_1938.85

_96.9











































































































Control Limits: Mercury 80-120; Other Metalii 30-110; Cyanide 85-115

FORM II (PART 1) - IN	* 11*02.2.

E-59


-------
U.S. EPA - CLP
2A

INITIAL AND CONTINUING CALIBRATION VERIFICATION

000041. )

ame: ROSS_ANALYTICAL_SERVICES_

ode: ROSS		Case No.: 	

al Calibration Source: PLASMA CHEM

Contract: METC0_
SAS No.: 	

SDG No.: BAGHOtT

nuing Calibration Source: PLASMA CHEM_ -

Concentration Units: ug/L

yte

Initial/ Calibration
True Found %R(1)

Continuing Calibration
True Found %R(1) Found %R(l)



M

UK

p

p~*

m

NR
NR
P

NR
P

NR

p

p"~

p-

MR

NR

P



IR

m
>

>

m
>

>~
iE

IR
>

»

iR
m

IR
JR
JR
SR
JR
?

.r

E-61


-------
U.S. EPA - CLP



U.S. EPA - CLP

000045

23

CRDL STANDARD FOR AA AND ICP

Name: ROSS_ANALYTICAL_SERVICES_

Code: ROSS		Case No.: 	

RDL Standard Source: 	

Contract: METCO_
SAS No.:

SDG No. r BAGHOU

CRDL Standard Source: SOLUTIONS PL

Concentration Units: ug/L



CRDL Standard for AA





CRDL Standard for ICP









Initial



Final

lyte

True

Found

%R



True

Found

%R

Found

%R.

minum_
imony_

enic	

ium

yllium

muth	

mium
cium
omium_

alt	

per	

n

























	200.0

	213.32

106.7





































































	10.0

12.23

122.3























	20.0

26.15

100.8























40.0

Zoo.o

	100.0

4b.46
564.35
90.30

101.2
132.2
_90.3















d





•*





hiura	

Ties ium
ganese
cury
ybdenu

kel^	

assium

enium_

ver

ium

llium_

































	10.0

13.98

139.8













-









^iJw

oo
o o

14.39
41.91

72.6
T04.8









































































































adium
c



























































































































aotr

VL
E

i

r

IK
IR

¦R

)

•R

i

R

R

R

R

R
R
El
R
R
El

FORM II (PART 2) - IN

ILMQ2.I.

E-62


-------
U.S. EPA - CLP

000046

2B

CRDL STANDARD FOR AA AND I CP

Name: ROSS_ANALYTICAL_SERVICES_

Code: ROSS		Case No.: 	

:rDL Standard Source: 	

Contract: METC0_
SAS No.: 	

SDG No.: BAGHOtT

CRDL Standard Source: SOLUTIONS PL

Concentration Units: ug/L

lyte

minum
imony_
enic_
ium "
/Ilium
nuth_
nium_
2ium_
smium
ilt_

?er	

1
I

lium

lesiurn

fanese

:ury

'bdenu

:el	

is slum
:nium_

¦er	

um	

lium

dium

CRDL Standard for AA
True Found *R

True

CRDL Standard for ICP
Initial	Final

Found %R Found VR







200.0
	400.0

181.97
	393.44

.91.0
~98 .4













	10.0

	10.51

106.1

	20.0

^	56.33

101.6

40.0
500.0
100.0

S2.45

131.1
112.8
114.8

225.62
114.84







O
•

o

H|

10.79

107.9



O O
OO

Tl

22.02

110.1
111.7

44.68







































	40.0

54.03

135.1



























FORM II (PART 2) - IN

ILM02.X

E-66


-------
U.S. EPA - CLP

00004V

23

CRDL STANDARD FOR AA AND ICP

lame: ROSS_ANALYTI CAL_SERVICES_

:ode: ROSS		Case No.: 	

IDL Standard Source: 	

Contract: METCO_
SAS No.:

SDG No.: BAGHDU"

;RDL Standard Source: SOLUTIONS PL

Concentration Units: ug/L



CRDL Standard for AA



CRDL Standard for ICP







Initial

Final

.yte

True

Found

%R



True

Found

%R

Found

ttt

iinum_
mony

mic	

.uin	

'Ilium

*uth	

lium	

:ium	

>miura
tit ~
>er	

L









































	400.0

		466.41

102.1















































































































































I

















iium_

lesium

ranese

mry

'bdenu

¦.el^	

issium
snium
rer
um

lium_

































































































































































































clium_























	40.0

42.89

107.2



























































































FORM II (PART 2) - IN

ILM02-1


-------
U.S. EPA - CLP

000048

3

BLANKS

ame: ROSS_ANALYTICAL_SERVICES_
>de: ROSS		Case No-: 	

Contract: METCO_
SAS No.:

SDG No.: BAGHOIT

ration Blank Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_

ration Blank Concentration Units (ug/L or rag/kg): MG/KG

te

Initial
Calib.
Blank
(ug/L)

/

C

Continuing
Blank
1 C

Calibration
(ug/L)

2 C 3

C



Prepa-
ration
Blank

C



M

nura







U

















iAr

ony

8.5

0

8.5

8.5

U

8.5

U



0.850

u



p

ic

18.8

u

39.9

B

18.8

U

18.8

U



1.880

U



p

n

























NR

Lium

























NR

th

























NR

am

0.6

tf

0.6

0

0.6

tt

0.6

D



0.060

u



P

am







S







0









NR

Lira

-3.1

6

-4.3

2.6

U

2.6



0.260

U



P





U



0







0









NR

r

14.0

14.0

14.0

14.6



1.466

0



P



71.7

u

71.7

U

71.7

U

71.7

u



7.170

u



P



-9.2

B

-10.5

B

8.0

U

8.0

u



0.800

u



P

im

























NR

lium





















0



NR

lese

0.8

u

0.8

0

0.8

tr

0.8

0



0.080



P

y

0.04

u

o.w

u

0.0V

u







0.015

u



cv

enu

5.8

u

5.8

u

5.8

u

5.6

t]f



-0.921

B



p



2.8

u

2.8

u

2.8

U

2.8

u



0.280

D



p

ium

























tar

um

























NR



























NR



























NR

am

























NR



























NR

um







5







U





0



NR



2.2

0

3.5

2.2

0

2.2



0.220



P











































































































































































FORM III

IN

XLM02.X

E-68


-------
u s EPA CLP	000049

3

BLANKS

arae: ROSS ANALYTICAL SERVICES	Contract: METCO

ode: ROSS		Case No.: 	 SAS No.: 	 SDG No.: BAGHOO"

ration Blank Matrix (soil/water) : HATER

ration Blank Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg) : UG/L_

rte

Initial
Calib.
Blank /
(ug/L)

C

Continuing
Blank
1 C

Calibration
(ug/L)

2 C 3

C



Prepa-
ration
Blank

C

M

.num



E







5



5







sir

rany

11.5

8.5

U

14.4

10.3



8.500

0

p ~

lie





18.8

U



18.8

D

-24.6

B



18.800

U

p

ira

























NR-

liura























NR~

ith



E



S







I





U

NR

um

0.8

l.i

6.$

1.0



0.666

P

um







0



U



I







NE~

ilum

2.6

U

2.6

2.6

4.9



2.600

a

P

t











cr











Nft

r

14.0

U

14.0

V

14.6

14.6

0



14.000

u

p



71.7

U

75.8

B



71.7

D

71.7

u



71.700

u

p



18.0

B

12.2

B



" 8.0

U

8.0

u



8.000

u

p"		

um























NK~

slum























NR

nese

-1.6

B

0.8

U

0.8

0

0.8

0



0.800



P

ry

O.OH

U

0,0*

a

0.0V

B

0.0V

u



0.130

B

CV

denu

5.8

a

5.8

o

5.8

U

5.8

u



5.800

XT

P

1

2.8

u

5.5

B

7.2

B

2.8

u



2.800

U

P

sium























ne~

ium























m

r























NR

n























NR

Lum























NR

























NR

ium











u









S

NR







2.2

tJ

2.2

2.2

ty



4 .460

P



































































































































	

























Cam tyiSh*

FORM III - IN	ILM02.r




-------
U.S. EPA - CLP

vuvuou

3

BLANKS

Name: ROSS_ANALYTICAL_SERVICES_
Code: ROSS		Case No. : 	

Contract: METCO_
SAS No.:

SDG No.: BflGHDH

aration Blank Matrix {soil/water) •- HATER

aration Blank Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg): UG/L_

lyte

Initial
Calib.
Blank,
(ug/L)/

C

Continuing Calibration
Blank (ug/L)
1 C 2 C 3

C



Prepa-
ration
Blank

c

minum







1



5



5





5

imony



U

9.9

14.0

11.5



34.200

enic

18.8

28.2

B

18.8

u

28.6

B



29.110

B

Lum























allium























nuth







B



B









B

nium





1.2

1.6

0.6

0



0.750

;ium







S



5











jmium





-2.8

-S. 5

S.2

B



2.600

0

lit











U



U







Der





14.0

tl

14.0

14.0



14.000

0

i





71.7

U

71.7

U

92.6

B



71.700

u

i





13.5

B

15.0

B

9.2

B



15.030

B

lium























lesium







U







V







janese





6.6

0.8

V

6.6



0.800

0

:ury





O.Otf

U

0.0^-

u

0.0*

U



0.152

B

dbdenu





5.8

U

5.8

u

5.8

u



5.870

B

;el





4.1

B

2.8

XJ

3.8

B



5.090

B

issium























'.nium























rer























um























lium















































dium



U



0



5



5





i m



2.2

2.2

2.6

4.3



2.530

















































































































































C/rn -V i+tib
FORM III - IN

ICM02.X

E-70


-------
000055

U.S. EPA - CLP
4

ICP INTERFERENCE CHECK SAMPLE

ne: ROS S_ANALYT I CAL_S ERVI CES_	Contract: METCO

ie: ROSS		Case No.; 	 SAS No: 	 SDG No.: BBGHEXT

Number: TJA 36		ICS Source: CPI	

Concentration Units: ug/L

Tru£
Sol. Sol.
alyte A AB

.Initial Found
Sol. Sol.

A AB VR

Final Found
Sol. Sol.

A AB *R

ninum
irnony

enic	

ium

/Ilium

muth	

mium
cium
omium

alt	

per	

n

500000

500000
1000
	1000

_493094

495083.8
1080.4
	1067.2

99.0
108.0
106.7

_466533

473708.2
~ 1005.0
1193.1

94.7
TOO. 5
119.3















































1000

TiJoooo

500

•J .

916.5
"475063.0
^	441.3

91.6
"95.6
"88.3



883.7
459935.0
430.6

88.4
92.0
"86.1

500000

_4$6237

_468600













500



480.1
""177549.3
~	897.6

96.0
"*88.8
"89.8



447.4
172159.0
~ 867.3

69.5
86.1
_86.7

200000

200000
	1000

_181054

_174242

d

tiium
neeium
ganese
cury
ybdenu

fcel^	

assium
enium

ver	

ium

llium_









500000

500000
~~ 500

_48$757

489750.2
~ 484.3

98.0
"96.9

_464458

46978!). 6
468.3

94. 0
_93.7





-









1600
1000



903.8
850.4

90.4
"85.0



657.6

85.8
_82.6







826.3



























































































adium

0



















	_10.00



906.3

_90.9



890.1

_89.0





































































1











FORM IV - IN	.ILMQ2.1

E-7S


-------
U.S. EPA - CLP

oooo6i

5A

SPIKE SAMPLE RECOVERY

EPA SAMPLE BO.

fame: ROSS_ANALYTICAL_SERVICES_

Case No.:

Contract:METCO

'ode: ROSS	

x: SOIL	

ids-For Sample: 100.0

SAS No.:

ABAGDUSTS

SDG No.:
Level (low/med) :

BASHOtf
LOW

Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG

Control
Limit
%R

86-115

80-120"

80-120

60-110

80-120"

Spiked Sample
Result (SSR)

234.3204
"372.5728"

954.3204

1012.5728

1853.6893
159021.5048"
" 22572.3301"

20183.7864*-
15.1538
181.6019-
487.0388

163908.1068

Sample
Result (SR)

89.1827
146.4423

*34.0365

W5.1442

1724.4231
153704.9038
~ 22548.3654

26344.2*788
13.8824
27.8846
299.0865

163409.6154

Spike
Added (SA)

194.17
"194.17

194.17

194.17

194.17
"?883 .50
" 194.17

194.17
" 0.77
154.17
'194.17

194.17

*R

74.7
116.5

113.4

112.0

£6.6
136.9
" 12.3

-62.7
"165.1
" 93.5
96.8



ts:

FORM V (Part 1} - IN	113302.X

E-81


-------
U.S. EPA - CLP

OQ0062

5A

SPIKE SAMPLE RECOVERY

EPA SAMPLE NO.

dame: ROSS_ANALYTICAL_SERVICES_

Case No.

Contract:METCO

¦"ode: ROSS
Lx: SOIIi

Lids-For Sample: 100.0

SAS No.

ABAGDUSTSD

SD5~SoTT"
Level Clow/med) s

BAflHOO

COW

Concentration Units {ug/L or mg/kg dry weight) s MG/KG

ilyte

Control
Limit
*R

Spiked Sample
Result (SSR)

C

Sample
Result (SR)

C

Spike
Added (SA)

*R

Q

M

linum









5







MR

.mony

80-120

2^2.0588

&

89.1827

196.08

93.3

R

P

:nic

80-120

410.5392

B

146.4423

B

196.08

134.7

P

.um

















NR

'Ilium

















NR

tuth

















MR

lium

ed-126

$26. Hit



734.0385



196.08

98.3



P

ium

















NR

mium



963.6275



7SS.1442



196.08

85.9



P

It

















MR

er



1772.3039



1724.4231



196.08

24.4



P





147620.5392



153704.9038



3921.57

-155.2



P





21915.0980



22548.3654



196.08

-323.0



P.

ium

















MR

esium

















MR

anese



19310.0000



20344.2788



196.OS

-527.5



P

ury



15.2941



13.8824



0.78

181.0



cv

bdenu

80-120

194.6569



27.8846

tJ

196.08

99.3



p

el

80-120

462.3529



299.0865



196.08

83.3



p

ssium

















NR

niura

















MR

er

















MR

am

















MR

Hum

















MR



















MR

lium

















NR





156362.4020



163409.6154



196.08

-3594.1



P























,













































































its:

FORM V (Part 1) - IN

HH02.I.

E-82


-------
U.S. EPA - CLP
5B

POST DIGEST SPIKE SAMPLE RECOVERY

EPA SAMPLE NO.

dame: ROSS_ANALYTICAL_SERVICES_ Contract:

-ode: ROSS	 Case No. : 	 SAS No. :

ix: SOIL	

Concentration Units:

METCO

ABAGDUSTA.
SEXS No.: BAflHOO

Level (low/med): LOW_
ug/L

c

Sample
Result (SR)

C

Added (SA)

*R

Q

M





I







SB.



927.50

fan. turn

83.5



P



1523.00

B

Act* OOO

96.3



F













nR













NR













MR













NR













NR













NR













NR













NR













NR













NR













NR













NR













NR













KR













NR













NR













NR













NR













NR













NR













NR













NR













NR













NR







































































alyte

minum
imony|_
enic_
ium
/Ilium
muth_
mium_
cium_
omium

alt	

per	

n
d

hmm

nesium

ganese

curv

ybdenu

kel^	

asslum
enium_

ver	

ium	

llium_

adium

Control
Limit
*R

Spiked Sample
/ Result (SSR)

84461.50
T94191.50"

ents:

2.X

E-95


-------
U.S. EPA - CLP
5B

POST DIGEST SPIKE SAMPLE RECOVERY

lame: ROSS_ANALYTICAL_SERVICES_ Contract: METCO.

;ode: ROSS	 Case No.: 	 SAS No.: 	

.X: 	SOIL	

000076

EPA SAMPLE NO.

ABAGDUSTAD

SDG i4o.: BAGHGU

Concentration Units:

Level (low/med): LOW_
ug/L

tlyte

Control
Limit
%R

Spiked Sample
/Result (SSR)

C

Sample
Result (SR)

C

Added (SA)

IR

Q

M

linum









6







HE

.mony



1009^5. SO



927.50

/on. oca

100.0



P

tnic



193341.50



1523.00

B

Ado oao

95.9



P~

.um

















NR

'Ilium

















NR

luth











rj*r\





NR

aum











MS J10





NR

:ium

















NR

imium

















NR

ilt

















NR

•er

















NR

i

















NR

L

















NR

aum

















NR

lesiutn



¦»













NR

anese

















NR

:ury

















NR

txienu

















NR

el











-





NR

ssium

















NR

nium

















NR

er

















NR

um













.



NR

Hum

















NR



















NR

dium

















NR



















NR



































































































	

nts:

2.r

E-96


-------
U.S. EPA

CLP

DUPLICATES

Name: ROSS_ANALYTICAL_SERVICES_

Code: ROSS		Case No.: 	

ix (soil/water): SOIL_
lids for Sample: 100.0

Contract: METCO_
SAS No. :

000079

EC* SAMPLE NO.

ABAGDUSTD

SDG No.: BAGHOtf

Level (low/med): LOW
% Solids for Duplicate: _1Q0.Q

Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight) : HQ/KG

iVnalyte

Vlumlnum_
Vntimony_
irsenic
Sarium '
lerylliura
}ismuth_
:admium_
:alcium_
.'hromium

:obalt	]

topper	

!ron	

jead

.ithium

[agnesium

tanganese

lercury

iolybdenu

ickel^	

otassium
elenium_

ilver	

odium

hallium_

in

ouiadium_
Lnc

Control
Limit

Sample (S)

"5571527
146.4423

734.0385

795.1442

1724.4231
153704.9038
" 22548.3654

26344.2766
13.8824
27.8846
299.0865

163409.6154

U

Duplicate (D) C

"171.5686

715.2451

15773555

	1«1.61S7

"153479.9020
" 21557.1078

"ttr/TTSJZ?
14.0769
28.4314
316.4216

156582.8431

U

RPD

13.4
"15.8"

~T7T

11.0

STT"

"* 17. 7~
4.5"

4.0
"1.4"

"375"

4.3

HE
P

P~
ME
MR
NR
P

ME
p

NE
p

p~
p~
ME
MR
P

CV
P

P~
ME
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
MR
P

FORM VI - IN

ILK02.2.

E-99


-------
U.S. EPA - CLP

§PilC£ DUPLICATES

fame: ROSS_ANALYTICAL_SERVICES_

;ode: ROSS		Case No.: 	

Lx (soil/water): SOIL_

Lids for Sample: 100.0

Contract: METCO_
SAS No.:

00008S

EPA SAMPLE NO.

ABAGDUSTSD

SDG No.: BAGHOU

Level (low/med)= LOW
V Solids for Duplicate; _100.O

Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MQ/KG

\nalyte

Vluminum_
\ntimony_
\rsenic_ ""
Barium "
3eryllium
3ismuth_
:admiura_
ralcium_
rhromium

Cobalt	]

Copper	

Iron

Lead"
Ciithium'
4agnesium
Manganese
Mercury
tolybdenu

Nickel	

Potassium
3elenium_

Silver	

Sodium

Thallium

Tin

Vanadium
Sine

Control
Limit

Sample (S)

"372.5728

"15475254

10X2.5728

—IS53T5553"
159021.5048
" 22572.3301

20183.7864
15.1538
181.6019
487.0388

163908.1068

Duplicate (D) C

272.058&
"410.5392

725775T7
553.6275

—TTTTrSVSS
"177620.5392
" 21915.0980

15.2941
T94.S569
462.3529

156362.4020

RPD

14.9
" 9.7"

jmr
"37TT

"775"
"7.4"
"3.0"

4.4

"0.9"
"6.9"
"5.2"

"477"

M

RR

P.

P~

NR

NR

NR

P

NK
P .
NK
P

P~
P"~
nR
NR.
P

c!7
P

P~
nR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
P

FORM VI

IN

ILM02.I.

E-108


-------
Name: ROSS_ANALYTICAL_SERVICES

Code: ROSS		Case No.: _

ix (soil/water): SOIL_
lids for Sample: 100.0

U.S. EPA - CLP
Posi SPlKE DUPLICATES

Contract: METCO

000089

£CA. SAMPLE NO.

ABAGDUSTAD

SAS NO.:

	 SDG No.: BAGHOU

Level (low/med)r LOW

V Solids for Duplicate: _1Q0.<1
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight} : MS/KG

ftoalyte

Muminum_
=intimony_
\rsenic ~~
3arium '
beryllium
3isimxth_
:admium_
:alcium_
;hromiuni

robalt	'

ropper	

Cron_
jead"

jithlum

lagnesium

(anganese

lercury

lolybdenu

ricKel__	

'otassium
!elenium_

lilver	

odium

halliura_

in

anadium_
inc

Control
Limit

Sample (S)

34.4615
"194.1915

Duplicate (D) C

160.9(555
*193.3415

RPD

17.8
" 0.4"

m

p
p*

m

NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR

FORM VI - IN

ILM02.3.

E-109


-------
U.S. EPA - CLP	000094

7

LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE
ame: ROSS ANALYTICAL SERVICES	Contract: METCO	

ode: ROSS	Case No.: 	 SAS No.: 	 SDG No.r BACHQU

LCS Source: ERA

as LCS Source: SOLUTIONS PL

yrte

Aqueous (ug/L)
True Found %R

Solid (mg/kg)

True Found C Limits %R

inum_
T»ony~

aic	

lm

Llium

ith	

Lum
Lum
alum
Lt ~
»r	



I







1 II 1 1 1 1 II II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1







1000.0
_1000.0

966.06
_1040.47

96.6
104.0_

116.0
95.3

96.2

23.2

316.0
	146.0

82.9
I0S.7

	100.7

46.7



































_1000.0

_1031.09

103.1_

	106.0

	106.2

62.5

	148.0

100.2



_1000.0

_1050.11

105.0_

82.3

	81.4

48.6

	114.0





1

HOH

ooo
o o o
ooo
• • •
OOO

950.34
51267.69
_1043.37

S5.6
106.3"
104.3_

94.9

102.6
¥371.1
	86.3

57.5

IUJ

H-0H
MOGJ

mo*
ooo

108.1
67.4
"94.1

6490.0
91.7

4350.0
49.5



Lum

ssium

inese

SF"—

>denu

sl^	

3Siura

lium

sr

im

.ium_





















1000.0
~ 2.0

1049.84
~ 1.82

lOfe.O

91.0*"
T01.3
102.2_

138.0
10.0

129.2
11.0

95.2

186.0
15.6
149.0
	142.0

93.6
T10.0
103.2
101.7

5.2
53.8

. 1(5(10.0
_1000.0

1013.21
_1021.52

94.4

99.5

97.4
T01.2

58.7





















































































lium_

















_1000.0

_1028.30

102.8_

dd.6

	100.2

56.2

	150.0

101.6

































































































FORM VII - IN

ILM02.r

E-114


-------
U.S. EPA - CLP	000095

7

LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE
Name: ROSS ANALYTICAL SERVICES	Contract: METCO

Code: ROSS		Case No.: 	 SAS No.: 	 SDG No.: BAGHDTT

d LCS Source: 	

ous LCS Source: SOLUTIONS PL

lyte

nxnum_
Lmony_
jnic_
Lum "
allium

BUth	

aium
;ium
>mium
lit ~

>er	

i

I

iiium

lesium

fanese

:ury

bdenu

:el^	

ssium
niura_

er	

um	

liura_

dium

Aqueous (ug/L)
True Found %R

1000.0
"1000.0

.1666.6
1666.6

1000.0
20000.0
1000.0

1000.0
2.0

TMo.o

"1000.0

1000.0

1120.01
"1020.24

1040.94

1666.57

SS<5.xi
31568.57
1049.75

1060 .31

		1.37

1033.77
1038.61

1015.91

112.0
102.0"

104.1

106.7

99.6
107.8"
105.0"

106.0
68.5"
103.4"
103.9"

101.6

Solid (nog/kg)

True Found C	Limits	%&

FORM VII - IN

ILM02.L

E-11S


-------
U.S. EPA - CLP
10

Instrument Detection Limits (Quarterly)

000099

"fame: ROSS_ANALYTICAL SERVICES_

;ode: ROSS	 Case So.: 	~

[D Number:	TJA_36	

»AA ID Number : 	

ice AA ID Number : 	

Contract: MBTCO
SAS No.:

Date: 01/03/96

fry J/trAtG AnA/tt/ff-

SDG No. : BAGHOtX

Analyte

Wave-
length
(nm)

Back-
ground

SQL-

CXCX71j

(ug/L)

XSir
(ug/L)

M

P
P

UK"

NR~

NR~

P ~

P

P

nK~

P ~

P

P

NE"
P ~
P

nir

p ~
p

HE"

NR~

NR

NR~

NR

NR

NR."

P ~

Aluminum
Antimony,

Arsenic	

Barium

Beryllium

Bismuth

Cadmium

Calcium

Chromium

Cobalt

Copper

Iron

308.22
206.84
_193.70_



100
100

27.2



8.5



200
2

18.8









1







10



226.50
315.89"
_267.72~



5

0.6



200
10

148.0
2.6





5



324.75
"259.94"
_220.35T



20

14.0
71.7



loo

50

Lead



8.0

Lithium

Magnesium

Manganese

Mercury

Molybdenu

Nickel

Potassium

Selenium

Silver ~

Sodium

Thallium

Tin



100



279.08
"257.61_



100
5

23.0



0.8



6.2



202.00
J231.60"



10

5.8



20

2.8



200







5







5







560







5







10



Vanadium
Zinc





10



_il3.86_



20

2.2













































*











FORM X - IN	ILM02.X

E-119


-------
WVJLUU -

U.S. EPA - CLP
10 .

Instrument DeteU-6t0

-

rsm





20







200







5







5







500







5







10



Vanadium
Zinc





10







20

















































-











nts:

FORM X - IN	.ILMQ2.X

E-120


-------
Ross Analytical Services, Inc.

1643] Folkz MaftidfMtway - Slroncsvillc, Qiio 44136

OOOOOl

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

client:

Metco Environmental
16115 Dooloy Road
Dallas, TX 75244

HOrk Order ft: 96-02-151
Client Coda: METCO
Report Dates 03/04/96
Work ID: Dust for reanalysia
Date Received: 02/0B/96

Attn: Hanoch Toren

/

Purchase Order: Chapparal Steel/96-15

SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION

Lab

Number
01

Sample

	Description

B Baghouse Dust

Lab
number

Sample
Description

Data are reported on an as-received basis unless stated other-
wise. Estimated Quantitation Limits (EQL1 s) are listed for
most analytes. EQL's are the lowest concentrations that can
be reliably measured under routine laboratory conditions,
unless otherwise noted, method blanks bad no targets found
above their EQL's and results were not corrected for blanks.

Carol L. Turner

E-3S8


-------
000002

Work Order # 96-02-151	Ross Analytical Services, Ino	Reported! 03/04/SC

REPORT COMMENTS

Target hits were found for arsenic and antimony but these results were below
the reported SQL and reported as  (ng/Xg)

Antimony	01	55.7 B	500

Arsenic	01	108 B	500

A duplicate of

this sample

was analyzed.

Metal

Result

(mg/Kg)

Antimony

60.0

B

Arsenic

93.3

B

Cadmium

544



Chromium

882



Copper

1510



Iron

134,000



Lead

17,900



Manganese

19,000



Molybdenum

35.7

B _

Nickel

285



Zinc

126,000



Laboratory Control Sample

Metal	% Recovery

Antimony	131

Arsenic	ill

Cadmium	110

Chromium	108

Copper	120

Iron	79

Manganese	99

Molybdenum	116

Nickel	109

Zinc	107

E-389


-------
000004 .

ark Order # 96-02-151	Ross Analytical Services, Inc	Reported! 03/Q4/9S

»mr>la DescriDtionr

B Baghouse Dust

Lab Ho.* 01



iialvt* DaacriDtion

Result

Obits

KOI.

atiroony by ICP.

g/Kg

25

hromium by ICP

861

ng/Kg

50

3pper by ICP

1530

mg/Kg

xoo

con by ICP

133,000

*>g/Kg

1000

sad by ICP 1

18,200

mg/Kg

250

anganese by ICP

19,500

mg/Kg

25

alybdenum by ICP

46

mg/Kg

50

Lckel by ICP

287

mg/Kg

100

Lnc by ICP

128,000

mg/Kg

100

E-391


-------