SUMMARY OF THE
ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY ADVISORY BOARD MEETING
Monthly Teleconference Meeting: 866-299-3188/9195415544#

November 15, 2017; 1:00 - 3:00 p.m. EST

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Environmental Laboratory Advisory Board
(ELAB or Board) teleconference was held on November 15, 2017. The agenda for this meeting
is provided as Attachment A, a list of the participants is provided as Attachment B, and action
items from the teleconference are included as Attachment C. The official certification of the
minutes by the Chair or Vice-Chair is included as Attachment D.

ROLL CALL/INTRODUCTION

Dr. Mike Delaney, Vice-Chair of ELAB—in the absence of both Dr. Henry Leibovitz, Chair of
ELAB, and Ms. Lara Phelps, Designated Federal Official (DFO) of ELAB—welcomed
participants and guests to the teleconference. Ms. Kristen LeBaron called the roll of the Board
members and guests. Dr. Delaney explained that he plans on retiring in July 2018 and has
discussed this with Ms. Phelps, who indicated that he may be able to continue to serve on ELAB,
but a new Chair may need to be elected if he is unable to assume the role after Dr. Leibovitz's
term as Chair ends.

APPROVAL OF PRIOR MINUTES

Dr. Delaney asked for comments on the October meeting minutes; there were none. Dr. Mahesh
Pujari moved to accept the October 2017 minutes; Ms. Sharon Mertens seconded the motion.
The Board members voted unanimously, with one abstention, to approve the minutes.

OPENING REMARKS AND UPDATES FROM THE DFO

Ms. LeBaron explained that Ms. Phelps is continuing her efforts to improve the ELAB website.
A draft response to the selected ion monitoring (SIM) minimum criteria letter is under review by
the Forum on Environmental Measurements, and the Board should receive the response prior to
the December ELAB meeting.

The face-to-face meeting in January 2018 will be in Albuquerque, New Mexico. For those
members attending the full Forum on Environmental Accreditation, registration is open; those
attending only the ELAB meeting do not need to register for the Forum and should inform
Ms. Phelps. Hotel information is available on The NELAC Institute (TNI) website (www.nelac-
institute.org/forum/2018-winter). The TNI Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) Expert Committee
may hold another side-bar meeting, but that has not been confirmed.

Ms. Phelps will be back in the office on Monday, November 20.

In response to a question from Dr. Dallas Wait about the ELAB website updates, Ms. LeBaron,
Ms. Mertens and Dr. Delaney explained that the work involves publishing all Board products
since ELAB's inception in 1995, pairing Board products with the appropriate EPA response in
an organized manner, and determining the length of time products can be displayed on the front
page of the website before being archived.

ELAB Meeting

1

November 15, 2017


-------
TASK GROUP UPDATES ON CURRENT TOPICS

The Task Group leaders or their representatives provided updates about current Board topics.
Drinking Water Certification Officer Training Course

Ms. Sharon Mertens reported that the letter with ELAB's recommendations was sent to EPAwith
no additional modifications.

Cyanide Methodology

Dr. Delaney explained that the Task Group had met with EPA staff—Mr. Dan Hautman,
Ms. Judy Brisbin and Ms. Glynda Smith—and discussed each point of the Board's letter. The
discussion brought forth the realization that some states may institute regulations that are stricter
than the federal regulations, and any potential guidance from EPA may not work for every state.
Dr. Delaney needs to decide the next steps for the group.

In-Line and On-Line Monitoring

Mr. Michael Flournoy contacted Mr. Lem Walker and Ms. Denise Shaw of EPA, who indicated
that the Agency is revising Method 334.0 (Determination of Residual Chlorine in Drinking
Water) to include a sensor. EPA would like ELAB to review and provide feedback about the
revised method. This is the most logical next step for the Task Group, as the original charge was
too broad.

Dr. Delaney asked whether Mr. Walker's focus would be only on wastewater. Mr. Flournoy
responded that he did not think this would be the case. Once ELAB receives the revised method
to review, if this is the case, the Board can provide expanded input.

Ms. Stacie Crandall (Hampton Roads Sanitation District [HRSD]) explained that her
organization has been developing an on-line method for chlorine and met with Mr. Walker as
part of a group in October. HRSD is preparing to develop standard operating procedures that
address 40 CFR 136.7 quality control requirements that will be appropriate for use of on-line
analysis. Method 334 currently is approved for drinking water, so the focus is on wastewater.
HRSD is gathering data and may obtain feedback from manufacturers. Ms. Crandall is interested
in being nominated for membership to ELAB.

SIM

Dr. Delaney noted that Ms. LeBaron had provided the update for this topic during the DFO
remarks.

WET Testing

Although Dr. Leibovitz had stated that this group could move to inactive status, Ms. Mertens
noted that it would be beneficial to keep it on the active list until after the potential sidebar
meeting during the Forum on the Environmental Accreditation. Ms. Crandall explained that she
had received and answered questions from the Chair of the TNI WET Expert Committee

ELAB Meeting

2

November 15, 2017


-------
regarding parallels between the Discharge Monitoring Report-Quality Assurance (DMR-QA) for
chemistry and WET chemistry.

Dr. Pujari commented that many states question how to monitor National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) parameters and comply with NPDES permitting, noting that the
DMR-QA parameters are very limited and take more time. He cited the example of California.
Ms. Deb Waller responded that New Jersey applies the same approach, which Region 2 also
approved. Ms. Crandall added that the only proficiency tests (PTs) for toxicity testing that are
commercially available and meet the NELAP standards are within the DMR-QA. Ms. Waller
noted that quick-response PTs are available. Ms. Mertens explained that the quick-response PTs
normally are used as a corrective action in cases of DMR-QA failure, as required by different
states. Ms. Waller added that as long as a laboratory has not used the PTs previously, they still
serve as a blind PT.

Acrolein and Acrylonitrile Preservation andpH

Dr. Pujari explained that the Board had previously advised EPA regarding the analysis
requirements and pH preservation for acrolein and acrylonitrile, but EPA did not incorporate the
recommended changes in the final versions of the SW-846 and 40 CFR 136 updates. He asked
whether the ELAB members wanted to follow up with another letter requesting that the Agency
reconsider its stance.

Dr. Delaney noted that EPA's response to the Method Update Rule (MUR) comments on this
topic was that the data were not compelling. Dr. Pujari thought that the data ELAB submitted
had been compelling, so he spoke to Mr. Adrian Hanley (EPA), who could not explain why EPA
had not considered these data compelling. Dr. Pujari wondered whether ELAB had received a
specific response, and Ms. Patty Carvajal explained that the Board had not received a personal
response from EPA regarding ELAB's comments on the MUR. Dr. Delaney will ask Ms. Phelps
to verify that the Board did not receive a specific response regarding this issue in addition to the
public response to the MUR comments (e.g., those on Method 624).

Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS) Spectral Libraries

Dr. Brian Buckley would like the Board to form a Task Group, noting that many people in the
community have a passion for this topic. In response to a comment by Dr. Pujari about the
evolution of platforms and the need for methods to evolve with them, Dr. Buckley explained that
this topic goes well beyond a platform issue, especially as indicated by the discussion during the
August face-to-face meeting about whether identification with a user-generated library would be
acceptable to EPA, regardless of platform. The question became: What type of user-generated
library is acceptable? If the Task Group focuses only on platforms, it will do a disservice to the
environmental laboratory community. Dr. Buckley would like to focus on whether a set of
minimum criteria can be developed to be used by those who wish to generate their own library
and those who would like to continue to use the National Institute of Standards and Technology
library and whether EPA would be amenable to accepting these criteria. Dr. Dallas Wait agreed
with this approach, noting that EPA buy-in would be needed.

ELAB Meeting

3

November 15, 2017


-------
Ms. Mertens asked whether this approach would be independent of methods, programs and so
forth. Dr. Wait thought that fundamental criteria would need to be met. Dr. Buckley added that
the criteria should not be matrix specific. The guidelines that he would like the Task Group to
develop would transcend matrices, platforms and so forth. Mr. Flournoy agreed that the criteria
should not be platform specific and should be kept simple.

Dr. Buckley moved to establish a Task Group to develop recommendations on minimum criteria
for user-generated spectral libraries, which Mr. Brad Meadows seconded. The Board approved
the motion unanimously. Dr. Buckley will lead the Task Group, and Mr. Meadows and
Drs. Pujari, Leibovitz and Kim Anderson will serve on the Task Group. Mr. Flournoy can
suggest international experts, should the Task Group choose to include them.

The first step for the Task Group will be to draft a letter to determine whether EPA is willing to
entertain the development of criteria that would make user-generated libraries allowable for
existing methods. The external experts can review the letter and then be consulted further when
the Task Group begins to examine the criteria if EPA provides a positive response.

NEW TOPICS/ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION

After reading the minutes from the October meeting, which she had not been able to attend,
Ms. Waller clarified that the issue she had introduced was not so much about handling drinking
water issues more quickly—as the program has been successful in expediting issues—but rather
about encouraging the drinking water program to adopt the most recent approved methods
similar to the wastewater program and NELAP laboratory requirements. By the December
meeting, Ms. Waller will draft a letter to EPA on this topic so that the Board can determine
whether to send it to EPA.

Following up on the discussion from the October Board meeting, Ms. Mertens would like the
Board to establish a Task Group to explore the actions that EPA can take to deal with emerging
contaminants. The Board decided to hold off forming a Task Group during the last meeting to
ensure that Ms. Waller was present to determine that her drinking water issue was indeed
separate from the emerging contaminants issue discussed during the October meeting. The
discussion had focused on emerging compounds of concern that do not have a specific analytical
methodology for regulation. EPA's process to address these may take several years; additionally,
the Agency's resources are declining.

Ms. Mertens moved to form a Task Group to explore recommendations on potential interim
actions that EPA can take to deal with emerging contaminants prior to the rule-making process.
Ms. Waller seconded the motion. The Board members approved the motion unanimously.
Ms. Mertens will lead the Task Group, and Ms. Waller, Dr. Buckley, Dr. Delaney and
Ms. Carvajal will serve on it.

Dr. Delaney stated that he is concerned about the effects of climate change on the fate and
transport of emerging contaminants (e.g., harmful algal blooms and their movement).

Dr. Wait explained that the Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council has undertaken an
extensive effort to develop six fact sheets about per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (commonly
known as PFAS). The fact sheets are well-researched consensus documents on the following

ELAB Meeting

4

November 15, 2017


-------
topics: (1) naming conventions and physical and chemical properties; (2) regulations, guidance
and advisories; (3) history and use; (4) environmental fate and transport; (5) site characterization
tools, sampling techniques and laboratory analytical methods; and (6) remediation technologies
and methods. Three of these fact sheets were released recently, and more information is available
at pfas-l.itrcweb.org.

WRAP-UP/SUMMARY OF ACTION ITEMS

Ms. LeBaron reviewed the action items identified during the meeting, which are included as
Attachment C.

CLOSING REMARKS/ADJOURNMENT

Dr. Wait moved to adjourn the meeting; Ms. Waller seconded the motion. The Board
unanimously voted to adjourn the meeting at 2:21 p.m.

ELAB Meeting

5

November 15, 2017


-------
Attachment A

AGENDA

ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY ADVISORY BOARD
Monthly Teleconference Meeting: 866-299-3188/9195415544#
November 15, 2017; 1:00 - 3:00 p.m. EST

Call to Order/Roll Call/Introduction of Guests

Delaney/LeBaron

Approval of Prior Minutes

Delaney

Opening Remarks and Updates From the DFO

LeBaron

Updates on Current Topics

Drinking Water Certification Officer Training Course: Mertens

Cyanide Methodology: Delaney

In-Line and On-Line Monitoring: Flournoy

Selected Ion Monitoring: Delaney

Whole Effluent Toxicity Testing: Delaney

Acrolein and Acrylonitrile Preservation and pH: Pujari

GC/MS Spectral Libraries: Buckley

New Topics/Issues for Consideration	Delaney

Explore methods for EPA to handle drinking water issues more quickly than waiting for
the Federal Register process

Wrap-Up/Summary of Action Items	Delaney/LeBaron

Closing Remarks/Adjournment	Delaney

ELAB Meeting	6	November 15, 2017


-------
Attachment B

PARTICIPANTS LIST

Board Members

Attendance

Name

Affiliation

(Y/N)

N

Dr. Henry Leibovitz (Chair)

Rhode Island State Health Laboratories
Representing: Association of Public Health
Laboratories

Y

Dr. Michael (Mike) Delaney
(Vice-Chair)

Massachusetts Water Resources Authority

(MWRA)

Representing: MWRA

N

Ms. Lara Phelps (DFO)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Representing: EPA

Y

Dr. Kim Anderson

Oregon State University
Representing: Academia—Oregon State
University

Y

Dr. Brian Buckley

Rutgers Environmental and Occupational Health

Sciences Institute
Representing: Academia and Laboratory—Rutgers

Y

Ms. Patricia (Patty) Carvajal

San Antonio River Authority
Representing: Watershed/Restoration

Y

Mr. Michael Flournoy

Eurofins Environment Testing USA
Representing: American Council of Independent
Laboratories

N

Dr. Deyuan (Kitty) Kong

Chevron Energy Technology Company
Representing: Chevron

N

Mr. Jeff Loewe

NiSource, Inc.

Representing: Industry—NiSource, Inc.

Y

Mr. Brad Meadows

Babcock Laboratories, Inc.

Representing: Commercial Laboratory—Babcock
Laboratories, Inc.

Y

Ms. Sharon Mertens

Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District
Representing: The NELAC Institute

Y

Dr. Mahesh Pujari

City of Los Angeles

Representing: National Association of Clean
Water Agencies

N

Mr. Elan Rieser

Con Edison

Representing: Utility Water Act Group

Y

Dr. A. Dallas Wait

Gradient

Representing: Consumer Products Industry

Y

Ms. Debra (Deb) Waller

New Jersey Department of Environmental

Protection (NJDEP)

Representing: State Government—NJDEP

ELAB Meeting

7

November 15, 2017


-------
PARTICIPANTS LIST (CONT.)

Contractors and Guests

Attendance
(Y/N)

Name

Affiliation

Y

Ms. Kristen LeBaron
(Contractor)

The Scientific Consulting Group, Inc. (SCG)

Y

Ms. Manisha Kumar (Guest)

EPA/OSA

Y

Ms. Stacie Crandall (Guest)

Hampton Roads Sanitation District

Y

Ms. Jeanette Hernandez (Guest)

San Antonio River Authority

ELAB Meeting

8

November 15, 2017


-------
Attachment C
ACTION ITEMS

1.	Ms. LeBaron will finalize the October meeting minutes and send them via email to
Ms. Phelps.

2.	Dr. Delaney will follow up with Ms. Phelps to confirm that the Board did not receive a
specific response from EPA regarding the acrolein and acrylonitrile preservation issue and
that the public MUR response is the only response.

3.	ELAB will establish a Task Group to develop recommendations on minimum criteria for
user-generated spectral libraries. The first step is to draft a letter to determine whether EPA is
willing to entertain the development of such criteria.

4.	By the December meeting, Ms. Waller will draft a letter to EPA encouraging the drinking
water program to adopt the most recent approved methods similar to the wastewater program
and NELAP laboratory requirements.

5.	The Board will form a Task Group to explore recommendations on potential interim actions
that EPA can take to deal with emerging contaminants prior to the rule-making process.

ELAB Meeting

9

November 15, 2017


-------
Attachment D

I hereby certify that this is the final version of the minutes for the Environmental Laboratory
Advisory Board Meeting held on November 15, 2017.

Signature, Chair
Dr. Henry Leibovitz

Print Name, Chair

ELAB Meeting

10

November 15, 2017


-------