* _ \
PRO"^

Meteorological Model Performance for
Annual 2022 Simulation WRF v4.4.2

l


-------
2


-------
EPA-454/R-24-001
March 2024

Meteorological Model Performance for Annual 2022 Simulation WRF v4.4.2

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Air Quality Assessment Division
Research Triangle Park, NC


-------
1. INTRODUCTION

The Weather Research and Forecasting model (WRF) was applied for the entire year of 2022 to
generate meteorological data to support emissions and photochemical modeling applications
for the base and future years of the 2022 Modeling Platform. The WRF meteorological fields
will be converted to air quality modeling input data and used to support assessments of ozone,
PM2.5, visibility, and a variety of toxics.

The WRF model was applied to both the 36- and 12-km continental United States (36NOAM &
12US, respectively) scale domains, initialized directly from meteorological analysis data. Model
parameterizations and options outlined in this document were chosen based on a series of
sensitivity runs performed by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Office of Research
and Development that provided an optimal configuration based on temperature, mixing ratio,
and wind field. All WRF simulations were done by General Dynamics Information Technology
(GDIT) under contract to the USEPA.

2. MODEL CONFIGURATION

Version 4.4.2 of the WRF model, Advanced Research WRF (ARW) core (Skamarock, 2008) was
used for generating the 2022 simulation. Selected physics options include Pleim-Xiu land
surface model, Asymmetric Convective Model version 2 planetary boundary layer scheme, Kain-
Fritsch cumulus parameterization utilizing the moisture-advection trigger (Ma and Tan, 2009),
Morrison double moment microphysics, and RRTMG longwave and shortwave radiation
schemes (Gilliam and Pleim, 2010).

The 36-km North American domain (36NOAM) WRF model simulation was initialized using the
0.25-degree Global Forecast System (GFS) analysis and the 3-hour forecast from the 00Z, 06Z,
12Z, and 18Z simulations. The 12-km United States (12US) WRF model was initialized using the
12km North American Model (12NAM) analysis product provided by National Climatic Data
Center (NCDC). Where 12NAM data were unavailable, the 40km Eta Data Assimilation System
(EDAS) analysis (ds609.2) from the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) was used.
Analysis nudging for temperature, wind, and moisture was applied above the boundary layer
only. The model simulations were conducted continuously. The 'ipxwrf' program was used to
initialize deep soil moisture at the start of the run using a 10-day spinup period (Gilliam and
Pleim, 2010). Landuse and land cover data were based on the United States Geological Survey
(USGS) for the 36NOAM simulation and the 2011 National Land Cover Database (NLCD 2011)1.

1 The 2011 version of the NLCD is the most up-to-date landuse data that has been processed from satellite
information and WRF-ready at the time these simulations were conducted.

4


-------
Sea surface temperatures were ingested from the Group for High Resolution Sea Surface
Temperatures (GHRSST) (Stammer et al., 2003) 1km SST data.

Additionally, lightning data assimilation was utilized in the 12US simulation to suppress (force)
deep convection where lightning is absent (present) in observational data. This method is
described by Heath et al. (2016) and was employed to help improve precipitation estimates
generated by the model.

Figures 2.1 and 2.2 show the 36NOAM and 12US domain, which utilized a Lambert conformal
projection centered at (-97,40) with true latitudes of 33 and 45 degrees north. The 36NOAM
domain contains 184 cells in the X direction and 160 cells in the Y direction. The 12US domain
contains 412 cells in the X direction and 372 cells in the Y direction. The atmosphere is resolved
with 35 vertical layers up to 50 mb (see table 2.1), with the thinnest layers being nearest the
surface to better resolve the planetary boundary layer (PBL).

WRF Layer

Height (m)

Pressure (mb)

Sigma

35

17,556

50.0

0.000

34

14,780

97.5

0.050

33

12,822

145.0

0.100

32

11,282

192.5

0.150

31

10,002

240.0

0.200

30

8,901

287.5

0.250

29

7,932

335.0

0.300

28

7,064

382.5

0.350

27

6,275

430.0

0.400

26

5,553

477.5

0.450

25

4,885

525.0

0.500

24

4,264

572.5

0.550

23

3,683

620.0

0.600

22

3,136

667.5

0.650

21

2,619

715.0

0.700

20

2,226

753.0

0.740

19

1,941

781.5

0.770

18

1,665

810.0

0.800

17

1,485

829.0

0.820

16

1,308

848.0

0.840

15

1,134

867.0

0.860

14

964

886.0

0.880

13

797

905.0

0.900

12

714

914.5

0.910

11

632

924.0

0.920

10

551

933.0

0.930

9

470

943.0

0.940

8

390

952.5

0.950

7

311

962.0

0.960

5


-------
6

232

971.5

0.970

5

154

981.0

0.980

4

115

985.75

0.985

3

77

990.5

0.990

2

38

995.25

0.995

1

19

997.63

0.9975

Surface

0

1000.0

1.000

157 -
151 -
145 -
139 -
133 *

127 -
121 ฆ

115 -
109 -
103 -
97 -
91 -
85 -
79 -
73 -
67 -
61 -
55 -
49 -
43 -
37 -
31 -
25 -
19 -
13 -
7 -

i	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1—

1	19	37	55	73	91	109	127	145	163	181

Figure 2.1. Map of the WRF model domain: 36NOAM.

Table 2.1 WRF layers and their approximate height above ground level along with their
respective sigma and pressure levels.

6


-------
Figure 2,2 Map of WRF model domain: 12US.

3 MODEL PERFORMANCE DESCRIPTION

The WRF model simulations were evaluated to determine whether the output fields represent a
reasonable representation of the actual meteorology that occurred during the modeling period.
Identifying and quantifying these output fields allows for a downstream assessment of how the
air quality modeling results are impacted by the meteorological data. For the purposes of this
assessment, 2-meter temperature and mixing ratio, 10-meter wind speed and direction, and
downward shortwave radiation at the surface are compared to the corresponding measured
data. As described below, the evaluation of precipitation includes both a qualitative and
quantitative comparison between measured and modeled data.

The observation database for surface-based temperature, wind speed and direction, and mixing
ratio is based on measurements made at United States (i.e., National Weather Service) and
Canadian (i.e., Environment Canada) airports. The observational dataset (ds472 network) is
available from NCAR2. Monitors used for evaluation are shown in Figure 3.1.

2 https://rda.ucar.edu/datasets/ds472.0/

7


-------
Shortwave downward radiation measurements are taken at surface-based monitor locations
and these data are obtained from the Baseline Surface Radiation Network (BSRN,
https://bsrn.awi.de/). This network is global and a map of the locations used in this evaluation
is shown below (see Figure 3.2).

8


-------
Calgary

9HM

QUEBEC

Vancouver

g	

T	"J		

Seattle

o

WASHINGTON

Winnipeg

MONTANA

NORTH
DAKOTA

MINNESOTA

~

;VT,- .
MH

Ottawa Montreal

ฎ o

SOUTH <\7 .WISCONSIN.*	I	'	' MAINE^

I	DAKOTA A	Toronto

OREGON	IDAHO	XTT	^WTCHIGAN \

WYOMING 'J, NEW YORK

iniu* Chicago >		 ma oBoston

NEBRASKA	'	~	i	JCT Rl

A	.ฆซ!.	OHIO VV o

I v j NEVADA	fcJited States

UTAH	FT

San Francisco	Colorado kansas Missouri'.	Virginia 
-------
and V vectors between modeled (M) and observed (0) values, is used to assess wind vector
performance (Equation 1). Performance is best when these metrics approach 0.

(1) Wind displacement (km) = (Um - Uo + Vm - Vo)*(l km/1000 m)*(3600 s/hr)*(l hr)

Rainfall performance is examined spatially using side-by-side comparisons of monthly total
rainfall plots and statistically using monthly domain-wide biases. The WRF model outputs
predictions approximately 15 meters above the surface while observations are at 10 meters.
WRF generates output at near instantaneous values (90 second time step) as opposed to longer
averaging times taken at monitor stations. This should be considered when interpreting model
performance metrics.

3.1 Model Performance for Winds

WRF-predicted wind speed estimates are compared to surface-based measurements made in
the ds472 network described earlier and shown below for the 36NOAM (Figure 3.1.1) and 12US
(Figure 3.1.2) domains. Regional4 analysis of statistical metrics for wind speed performance by
quarter5 is shown in Table 3.1.1 for the 12US domain only. Monthly spatial biases across all
hours are shown for the 36NOAM (Figures 3.1.3-3.1.6) and 12US (Figures 3.1.7-3.1.10) domains.
Monthly spatial biases across daytime hours only are shown for the 36NOAM (3.1.11-3.1.14)
and 12US (3.1.15-3.1.18) domains. The hourly distribution of the observed and predicted wind
speeds by each Climate Region and quarter is shown in Figure 3.1.19 for the 12US domain.

There is a noticeable overprediction of wind speeds in the eastern US across all hours and
daytime hours only in both the 36NOAM and 12US simulations. That overprediction is coupled
with a general underprediction of wind speeds in the western US, except in areas of
exceedingly complex terrain (e.g., Rocky Mountains). There appears to be no significant
difference when analyzing the biases during daytime hours or all hours of the day.

Statistically, the mean bias across most regions and seasons is generally within +/- 0.5 m/s. The
underprediction in the western portions of the country noted above is less than -0.75 m/s on
average across all hours of the year.

4	Regions used are the NOAA Climate Regions outlined here:

https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/monitoring/reference-maps/us-climate-regions

5	Quarters are Q1 (January, February, March), Q2 (April, May, June), Q3 (July, August, September), and Q4
(October, November, December).

10


-------
Wind Speed Bias

Wind Speed Bias

-B-

-s—& —&—s—e-



-s—&

~T~
M

O

Wind Speed Error

1

a

g

i

S

i

e

a e e e

i
i

e

B

1
1

9

s

i

j

i

F

1

M

i

A

i i i i
M J J A

mon

Wind Speed Fractional Bias

i

s

1

O

i

N

1

D

i



i



i i i ฆ





i



i



1 | 1



i i r	1 i=i i	1

'iii

1—1

i



i 1

i

j

1

F

1

M

1

A

1 1 1 1
M J J A

mon

Wind Speed Fractional Error

i

s

1

o

1

N

1

D

&



i



^ ^ e e

1



i



1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	r

J	FMAMJ	JASOND

mon

Figure 3.1.1. Distribution of hourly bias by hour and hourly bias, error, fractional bias, and
fractional error for wind speed by month for 36NOAM domain.

11


-------
Wind Speed Bias

f -

I	I	I	I

I	I	I	I

"i	1	1	r~

9 10 11 12

~r~

13

~i	1	1	r~

14 15 16 17

~~i	1	1	1	r~

19 20 21 22 23

Hour of day (GMT)

Wind Speed Bias

1









1







1 1

1



1



1











f -

j j

mon

Wind Speed Error

Wind Speed Fractional Bias

s—wm—s—s—s—s—s s—s—s—s

~i-

M

"I-

M

~1~~

O

8

CM

* ง J

Wind Speed Fractional Error

^ ^ ^ ^

~r

M

~r~

o

Figure 3.1.2. Distribution of hourly bias by hour and hourly bias, error, fractional bias, a
fractional error for wind speed by month for 12US domain.


-------
Mean bias of Wind Speed (m/s) Date: BETWEEN 20220101 AND 20220131

... ijaavktir • •.!

iv'.*. "Wr;;- 'v
% * •••yS' -V *2?vซฅ

J?' ป

*

.. ซ v,..

•	-3

•	-2

•	-1

•	-0.5

•	-0.25
0

0.25
0.5

•	1

•	2

•	3

Mean bias of Wind Speed (m/s) Date: BETWEEN 20220201 AND 20220228

vli *V * VT •

?•* *3hvV.*v • ,

sV.'-T



0.25
0.5

Mean bias of Wind Speed (m/s) Date: BETWEEN 20220301 AND 20220331

\ • * /

** *

"ฆhi



-2

ฆ -1
-0.5
-0.25

0

0.25
0.5

1

Figure 3.1.3. Spatial distribution of wind speed bias (m/s) across all hours for the months of
January, February, and March (top to bottom) for the 36NOAM domain.

13


-------
Figure 3.1.4. Spatial distribution of wind speed bias (m/s) across all hours for the months of
April, May, and June (top to bottom) for the 36NOAM domain.

14


-------
Mean bias of Wind Speed (m/s) Date: BETWEEN 20220701 AND 20220731

Mean bias of Wind Speed (m/s) Date: BETWEEN 20220801 AND 20220831

Figure 3.1.5. Spatial distribution of wind speed bias (m/s) across all hours for the months of
July, August, and September (top to bottom) for the 36NOAM domain.

15


-------
October, November, and December (top to bottom) for the 36NOAM domain.

16


-------
Mean bias of Wind Si

Speed (m/s)

Date: BETWEEN 20220101 AND 20220131

: . • •• *

Mean bias of Wind Speed (m/s) Date: BETWEEN 20220201 AND 20220228

Mean bias of Wind Speed (m/s) Date: BETWEEN 20220301 AND 20220331

Figure 3.1.7. Spatial distribution of wind speed bias (m/s) across all hours for the months of
January, February, and March (top to bottom) for the 12US domain.

17


-------
Mean bias of Wind Speed (m/s) Date: BETWEEN 20220401 AND 20220430

t ,• i-w* ป* ป. ป • • • • . • •

fev-• :vi,

ฆ* • *fi • • ••

w#ซปป T % • • •

;•. :. j •

.•ฆ•r ' ^



Mean bias of Wind Speed (m/s) Date: BETWEEN 20220601 AND 20220630

~7~

j, *.. -.ia.*."''. • . H . •

^ tu;• • • • ,,

Figure 3.1.8. Spatial distribution of wind speed bias (m/s) across all hours for the months of
April, May, and June (top to bottom) for the 12US domain.

18


-------
Mean bias of Wind Speed (m/s) Date: BETWEEN 20220701 AND 20220731

Mean bias of Wind Speed (m/s) Date: BETWEEN 20220801 AND 20220831

Figure 3.1.9. Spatial distribution of wind speed bias (m/s) across all hours for the months of
July, August, and September (top to bottom) for the 12US domain.

19


-------
Mean bias of Wind Speed (m/s) Date: BETWEEN 20221001 AND 20221031

Mean bias of Wind Speed (m/s) Date: BETWEEN 20221101 AND 20221130

Mean bias of Wind Speed (m/s) Date: BETWEEN 20221201 AND 20221231

Figure 3.1.10. Spatial distribution of wind speed bias (m/s) across all hours for the months of
October, November, and December (top to bottom) for the 12LJS domain.

20


-------
Mean bias of Wind Speed (m/s) Date: BETWEEN 20220101 AND 20220131

Mean bias of Wind Speed (m/s) Date: BETWEEN 20220201 AND 20220228

Figure 3,1.11. Spatial distribution of wind speed bias (m/s) across daytime hours for the months
of January, February, and March (top to bottom) for the 36NOAM domain.

21


-------
•	-3

•	-2

•	-1

•	-0.5

•	-0.25
0

0.25
0.5

•	1

•	2

•	3

Mean bias of Wind Speed (m/s) Date: BETWEEN 20220501 AND 20220531

Mean bias of Wind Speed (m/s) Date: BETWEEN 20220601 AND 20220630

Figure 3.1.12. Spatial distribution of wind speed bias (m/s) across daytime hours for the months
of April, May, and June (top to bottom) for the 36NOAM domain.

22


-------
		Mean oias or win a speea (trvs) uaie: ee i vyeen ^uzzuaui nnu zuz^uaou	

\ V" • ' . '

ฆฆฆฆ ฆ >f-

Figure 3,1.13. Spatial distribution of wind speed bias (m/s) across daytime hours for the months
of July, August, and September (top to bottom) for the 36NOAM domain.

23


-------
Mean bias of Wind Speed (m/s) Date: BETWEEN 20221001 AND 20221031

Mean bias of Wind Speed (m/s) Date: BETWEEN 20221101 AND 20221130

Mean bias of Wind Speed (m/s) Date: BETWEEN 20221201 AND 20221231

Figure 3.1.14. Spatial distribution of wind speed bias (m/s) across daytime hours for the months
of October, November, and December (top to bottom) for the 36NOAM domain.

24


-------
Mean bias of Wind Speed (m/s) Date: BETWEEN 20220101 AND 20220131

'• • ••• 4 ••
\ . sbi.-:-,% . •

- -' • •	-"y • -

1

J ' !

'"-i

l*	^

>>-•ซ*• ' > i r

•	-3

•	-2

•	-1

•	-0.5
-0.25

Figure 3,1.15. Spatial distribution of wind speed bias (m/s) across daytime hours for the months
of January, February, and March (top to bottom) for the 12US domain.

25


-------
Mean bias of Wind Speed (m/s)

>: BETWEEN 20220401 AND 20220430

•• *4 *. W

j' • Vs • - y • • •	. • •

# m! • • • •• J>MVL	r • ...

Mean bias of Wind Speed (m/s) Date: BETWEEN 20220601 AND 20220630

: . •* • 

•* ^ \

0.25
0.5

•	2

•	3

Figure 3.1.16. Spatial distribution of wind speed bias (m/s) across daytime hours for the months
of April, May, and June (top to bottom) for the 12US domain

26


-------
Mean bias of Wind Speed (m/s) Date: BETWEEN

•	-3

•	-2

•	-1

•	-0.5

•	-0.25
0

0.25
0.5

•	1

•	2

•	3

Figure 3,1.17. Spatial distribution of wind speed bias (m/s) across daytime hours for the months
of July, August, and September (top to bottom) for the 12US domain.

27


-------
Mean bias of Wind Speed (m/s) Date: BETWEEN 20221001 AND 20221031

Mean bias of Wind Speed (m/s) Date: BETWEEN 20221101 AND 20221130

•	-3

•	-2

•	-1

•	-0.5
ซ -0.25

0

0.25
0.5

•	1

•	2

•	3

Figure 3,1.18. Spatial distribution of wind speed bias (m/s) across daytime hours for the months
of October, November, and December (top to bottom) for the 12US domain.

28


-------


"r

3

3












-------
u

5 -EV*

!T!5V.,

.5 -EV*

i

' rnsimmnnmm^ MlMP twป|iซii*iniiปrซ?ป*ii

WWUป





Figure 3.1.19. Hourly average distribution of observed and predicted wind speeds (m/s) for the
12US domain in the Northeast, Northwest, Northern Rockies & Plains, Ohio Valley, South,
Southeast, Southwest, Upper Midwest, and West Climate Regions (respectively, top to bottom)
for each quarter.

30


-------
Climate Region

Season

Mean Obs

Mean Mod

MAE

MB

NMB

NME

RMSE

Northeast

Q1

4.54

4.25

1.4

0.16

3.53

30.77

2.01

Q2

4.11

3.78

1.24

0.09

2.09

30.08

1.78

Q3

3.5

3.13

1.11

0.02

0.54

31.58

1.63

Q4

4.15

3.83

1.3

0.18

4.4

31.28

1.91

N. Rockies & Plains

Q1

5.66

4.81

1.54

-0.63

-11.19

27.21

2.08

Q2

5.81

4.92

1.53

-0.61

-10.45

26.38

2.07

Q3

4.25

3.78

1.25

-0.24

-5.65

29.37

1.72

Q4

5.31

4.44

1.42

-0.56

-10.62

26.85

1.93

Northwest

Q1

3.8

3.05

1.39

-0.36

-9.6

36.69

1.88

Q2

4.27

3.58

1.42

-0.25

-5.87

33.29

1.91

Q3

3.57

2.94

1.21

-0.31

-8.79

33.78

1.63

Q4

3.82

3.04

1.42

-0.32

-8.4

37.22

1.93

Ohio Valley

Q1

4.59

4.33

1.1

0.07

1.59

24.01

1.45

Q2

4.19

3.92

1.11

0.1

2.27

26.41

1.46

Q3

3.21

2.96

0.94

0.13

3.92

29.28

1.24

Q4

4.28

3.99

1.05

0.14

3.27

24.46

1.38

South

Q1

4.84

4.27

1.21

-0.18

-3.67

24.98

1.63

Q2

5.01

4.54

1.31

-0.14

-2.75

26.14

1.76

Q3

3.79

3.38

1.07

-0.06

-1.71

28.22

1.43

Q4

4.29

3.75

1.14

-0.15

-3.41

26.5

1.54

Southeast

Q1

3.92

3.77

1.2

0.36

9.26

30.48

1.6

Q2

3.58

3.36

1.12

0.22

6.25

31.35

1.49

Q3

3.15

2.8

1.05

0.12

3.7

33.34

1.43

Q4

3.44

3.28

1.09

0.37

10.82

31.83

1.46

Southwest

Q1

4.39

3.54

1.56

-0.54

-12.24

35.41

2.14

Q2

5.24

4.38

1.75

-0.52

-9.97

33.37

2.37

Q3

3.83

2.96

1.48

-0.67

-17.58

38.65

2.03

Q4

4.26

3.32

1.55

-0.61

-14.24

36.51

2.17

Upper Midwest

Q1

4.87

4.68

1.2

0.15

3.05

24.72

1.59

Q2

4.79

4.63

1.24

0.18

3.7

25.92

1.63

Q3

3.61

3.6

1.08

0.38

10.47

29.89

1.43

Q4

4.66

4.59

1.22

0.3

6.49

26.18

1.63

West

Q1

3.86

3.1

1.37

-0.33

-8.55

35.56

1.86

Q2

4.82

3.9

1.54

-0.45

-9.36

31.89

2.07

Q3

3.97

3.11

1.33

-0.53

-13.28

33.4

1.82

Q4

3.55

2.82

1.26

-0.34

-9.46

35.43

1.73

Table 3.1.1. Mean observed, mean modeled, mean absolute error
normalized mean bias (NMB), normalized mean error (NME), and
(RMSE) for wind speed (m/s).

(MAE), mean bias (MB),
root mean square error

31


-------
Wind vector displacement (km) is presented below for the 36NOAM (Figure 3.1.20) and 12US
(Figure 3.1.21) domains utilizing the ds472 observation network described earlier. These plots
show the entire distribution of hourly wind displacement by month and by hour of the day. The
average wind displacement for the WRF simulation is around 5-km for all months and hours of
the day. The interquartile ranges are roughly 2-10km. As the displacement is generally less than
the resolution of the model for either simulation, minimal impacts due to displacement of wind
vectors are expected.

32


-------
to _

CNt

O
CM

i/> _

E

JXL

O _

U") —

o —

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23

Hour of day (GMT)

Wind Displacement

o

CM ~
ii"> _

ฃ

O _

i—

ID —

O -

J FMAMJ JASOND

mon

Figure 3.1.20. Distribution of hourly wind displacement by hour and month for the 36NOAM
domain.

33

Wind Displacement

"i—i—r

"i—i—i—i—i—r

"i—i—r

"i—i—i—i—i—i—r


-------
Wind Displacement

O
CM

LD

E

O _

i	i	i

n—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—r~

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23

Hour of day (GMT)

Wind Displacement

T

S

T
O

T
N

T
D

mon

Figure 3.1.21. Distribution of hourly wind displacement by hour and month for the 12US
domain.

34


-------
3.2 Model Performance for Temperature

Temperature estimates are compared to the ds472 observation network described earlier and
are presented below for the 36NOAM (Figure 3.2.1) and 12US (Figure 3.2.1) domains. Regional
analysis of statistical metrics for temperature performance by quarter is shown in Table 3.2.1
for the 12US domain only.

WRF performs very well in terms of predicting temperature, showing a bias that oscillates
around 0 degrees for most hours of the day and months of the year. Model error decreases
slightly during the Spring and Summer months. In general, the interquartile range of the bias of
+/-1 degree is persistent across all hours of the day and all months of the year.

Spatial distribution of monthly biases is presented across all hours for the 36NOAM (Figures
3.2.3-3.2.6) and 12US (Figures 3.2.7-3.2.10) domains. The spatial distribution of monthly biases
across daytime hours only is presented for the 36NOAM (Figures 3.2.11-3.2.14) and 12US
(Figures 3.2.15-3.2.18) domains. The hourly distribution of observed and predicted
temperatures by Climate Region and quarter are shown in Figure 3.2.19. WRF generally
underpredicts temperatures slightly across the eastern US during the Winter into the early
Spring with the underprediction persisting longest in the northeast. A more noticeable
overprediction is noted across the eastern US during the summer and fall months with an
average overprediction of 0.25 to 0.5 degrees.

In areas of the western US, performance for temperature is mixed, with persistent significant
overpredictions and underpredictions observed in varying locations. Across daytime hours,
there is a more noticeable underprediction in the 36NOAM simulation compared the 12US
simulation. However, the range of the biases in both simulations tends to be mainly between
+/- 0.5 degrees.

35


-------
Temperature Bias

















1 1 1 1 1





3 ECS

"i	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	r

0 1 2 3 4 5 8 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

Hour of day < GMT}

Temperature Bias

i

T

-

?

^ ^ ^ ^

T

T

T



-

-

-

-

_i_

-I-

1

J

i

F

1

M

1

A

I l 1 l
M J J A

mon

Temperature Error

1

s

1

o

i

N

1

D





-y



>iii

T

7

i

_i_

"J-

1

J

1

F

1

M

1

A

i i i i
M J J A

mon

Temperature Fractional Bias

1

s

1

o

1

N

1

D

























-=i—

-=L- -=L-









1

J

1

F

1

M

1

A

I I 1 I

M J J A
mon

Temperature Fractional Error

1

s

1

o

1

N

1

D

Figure 3.2,1. Distribution of hourly bias by hour and hourly bias, error, fractional bias, and
fractional error for temperature by month for the 36NOAM domain.

36


-------
Temperature Bias

iO -

1 1
0 1

1	1

2	3

1 1

4 5

1 1

0 7

1 1

3 9

i i i i
1D 11 12 13

1 1
14 15

1 1
16 17

1 1
18 19

i i

20 21

I I

22 23











Hour of day (GMT)





















Temperature Bias











-r-

-r-























'

,—i—,

i



. i .

ฆ 1 i

ii i	' .

			

			

l I

l I



i | i

ฆ	;	J

*=-1—J "-T-

k—i—1

J—T—1

1 1

i i

I 3



-I-

-L"



-1—







-L-

"L"



I

J

1

F

l

M

I

A

1

w

1 1
J J

1

A

1

5

I

O

l

N

I

D











mon





















Temperature Error

































i

i

i

J



-r

-r-

-r-

,

i

1

ฆ

e

B

e

e

m a

ฆ



e

e

&

1

J

1

F

I

M

i

A

i

M

1 i
J J

1

A

1

S

i

o

i

N

1

D











mon



















Temperature Fractional Bias





















































1

J

1

F

1

M

1

A

i

M

1 1

J J

1

A

1

s

i

o

I

N

1

D











mon



















Temperature Fractional Error































-i-





















"l	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	r

J	FMAMJ	JASOND

men

Figure 3.2.2. Distribution of hourly bias by hour and hourly bias, error, fractional bias, and
fractional error for temperature by month for the 12US domain.

37


-------
Mean bias of 2 m Temperature (C) Date: BETWEEN 20220101 AND 20220131

Mean bias of 2 m Temperature (C) Date: BETWEEN 20220201 AND 20220228

Mean bias of 2 m Temperature (C) Date: BETWEEN 20220301 AND 20220331

Figure 3.2,3. Spatial distribution of temperature bias (C) across all hours for the months of
January, February, and March (top to bottom) for the 36NOAM domain.

38


-------
Mean bias of 2 m Temperature (C) Date: BETWEEN 20220401 AND 20220430

A v. r • ซ* f -



•	-3

•	-2

•	-1
-0.5
-0.25

0

0.25
0.5

1

2

3

Mean bias of 2 m Temperature (C) Date: BETWEEN 20220501 AND 20220531

Mean bias of 2 m Temperature (C) Date: BETWEEN 20220601 AND 20220630

Figure 3.2.4. Spatial distribution of temperature bias (C) across all hours for the months of April,
May, and June (top to bottom) for the 36NOAM domain.

39


-------
Mean bias of 2 m Temperature (C) Date: BETWEEN 20220701 AND 20220731

Mean bias of 2 m Temperature (C) Date: BETWEEN 20220801 AND 20220831

Mean bias of 2 m Temperature (C) Date: BETWEEN 20220901 AND 20220930

Figure 3.2.5, Spatial distribution of temperature bias (C) across all hours for the months of July,
August, and September (top to bottom) for the 36NOAM domain.

40


-------
	Mean bias of 2 m Temperature (C) Date: BETWEEN 20221001 AND 20221031	

pr

'1 V>^\

"XV^	' * ' •" '	?*•ฆ>	• -0.5

H,\ f	*	* "a2i

'# .*•• i <1	0-25

	---4* . &_

Mean bias of 2 m Temperature (C) Date: BETWEEN 20221101 AND 20221130

Mean bias of 2 m Temperature (C) Date: BETWEEN 20221201 AND 20221231

Figure 3.2.6. Spatial distribution of temperature bias (C) across ail hours for the months of
October, November, and December (top to bottom) for the 36NOAM domain.

41


-------
Mean bias of 2 m Temperature (C) Date: BETWEEN 20220101 AND 20220131



r	*

ฆ •• 1 .	*



V-

		—

•	-0.5

•	-0.25
0

0.25
0.5

•	1

•	2

•	3

Mean bias of 2 m Temperature (C) Date: BETWEEN 20220201 AND 20220228

Mean bias of 2 m Temperature (C) Date: BETWEEN 20220301 AND 20220331

Figure 3.2.7. Spatial distribution of temperature bias (C) across all hours for the months of
January, February, and March (top to bottom) for the 12US domain.

42


-------
Mean bias of 2 m Temperature (C) Date: BETWEEN 20220401 AND 20220430

Mean bias of 2 m Temperature (C) Date: BETWEEN 20220501 AND 20220531

:-.Y :

\ • . .





m 'ฆ



-3

-2

-1

-0.5

-0.25

0

0.25
0.5

1

2

3

Mean bias of 2 m Temperature (C) Date: BETWEEN 20220601 AND 20220630

v "!•#- '
T- ป

77?

-• ; 'ฆ • .-v..'' .

, V " ป -ฆ? ~
-J ml, r ฆ ป *•

-iJf ง

Figure 3.2.8. Spatial distribution of temperature bias (C) across all hours for the months of April,
May, and June (top to bottom) for the 12US domain.

43


-------
Mean bias of 2 m Temperature (C) Date: BETWEEN 20220701 AND 20220731

A' •'

#ป—— r	^	

% • Jซ!	m\9	•

? • -	• • J •	•	- - .

.r-\-k-^*

p<^.JnrJ "r.v^w
%||^w

\i\ \>. iป>•ปป ay?' •

. \\V. v/VS-'v^----i • *

a \



•	-3

•	-2

•	-1

•	-0.5

•	-0.25
0

0.25
0.5

•	1

•	2

•	3

Mean bias of 2 m Temperature (C) Date: BETWEEN 20220801 AND 20220831

•W:'

• -nV

• Jfi •	• I • " •

V/ * Ap . • i 1

* • > *-;•	.v "

•	4

;

t	* • •. ,r

.i v. <#r#

- •' !tg i , ;

ft \



•	-3

•	-2

•	-1

•	-0.5
-0.25

•	0
0.25
0.5

•	1

•	2

•	3

Mean bias of 2 m Temperature (C) Date: BETWEEN 20220901 AND 20220930

Figure 3.2.9. Spatial distribution of temperature bias (C) across all hours for the months of July,
August, and September (top to bottom) for the 12US domain.

44


-------
Mean bias of 2 m Temperature (C) Date: BETWEEN 20221001 AND 20221031

Mean bias of 2 m Temperature (C) Date: BETWEEN 20221101 AND 20221130

Mean bias of 2 m Temperature (C) Date: BETWEEN 20221201 AND 20221231

Figure 3.2.10. Spatial distribution of temperature bias (C) across all hours for the months of
October, November, and December (top to bottom) for the 12US domain.

45


-------
Mean bias of 2 m Temperature (C) Date: BETWEEN 20220101 AND 20220131

Mean bias of 2 m Temperature (C) Date: BETWEEN 20220301 AND 20220331

Figure 3.2.11. Spatial distribution of temperature bias (C) across daytime hours for the months
of January, February, and March (top to bottom) for the 36NOAM domain.

46


-------
Mean bias of 2 m Temperature (C) Date: BETWEEN 20220401 AND 20220430

%

d



J?

l , /. * • ••• t* . • •	ซ>

W* '•• ซ• r 'fr



ซ	* * .	ป- * • :• * ป_ ~"* ** "r f

•' * •	. -	-- J*

• i-_ *-C- .:V.k4>#

t.-r* r.;* viSilr

-..4V v'* .

Lซ

vv

-3

-2

-1

-0.5

-0.25

0

0.25
0.5

1

2

3

Mean bias of 2 m Temperature (C) Date: BETWEEN 20220501 AND 20220531

•r.-

: * - v. V v

.'•iฃ

#~f iSฃsfj

Mean bias of 2 m Temperature (C) Date: BETWEEN 20220601 AND 20220630

Figure 3.2.12. Spatial distribution of temperature bias (C) across daytime hours for the months
of April, May, and June (top to bottom) for the 36NOAM domain.

47


-------
Mean bias of 2 m Temperature (C) Date: BETWEEN 20220701 AND 20220731

T—T"





- *

•0-

Mean bias of 2 m Temperature (C) Date: BETWEEN 20220801 AND 20220831

ซ H •
/ป . '
I • •** •	*

r<

If

ฆ, .	• . -J	*>Y ^ ^ ^ . Ai

*ฆ * ปJV to ' 4

K ^	•• - • ' v.	Kv

: - • %	.. vy•&• -Vt

V\'ป.

Pi--J* L



•if-- sy

* ?	r

Mean bias of 2 m Temperature (C) Date: BETWEEN 20220901 AND 20220930

Figure 3.2.13. Spatial distribution of temperature bias (C) across daytime hours for the months
of July, August, and September (top to bottom) for the 36NOAM domain.

48


-------
Mean bias of 2 m Temperature (C) Date: BETWEEN 20221001 AND 20221031

u •••*•• * •	• n

* .l\*
v.* v. .

ฆ/j:*
- '

Mean bias of 2 m Temperature (C) Date: BETWEEN 20221101 AND 20221130

Mean bias of 2 m Temperature (C) Date: BETWEEN 20221201 AND 20221231

Figure 3.2.14. Spatial distribution of temperature bias (C) across daytime hours for the months
of October, November, and December (top to bottom) for the 36NOAM domain.

49


-------
Mean bias of 2 m Temperature (C) Date: BETWEEN 20220101 AND 20220131

Mean bias of 2 m Temperature (C) Date: BETWEEN 20220301 AND 20220331

Figure 3.2.15. Spatial distribution of temperature bias (C) across daytime hours for the months
of January, February, and March (top to bottom) for the 12US domain.

50


-------
Mean bias of 2 m Temperature (C) Date: BETWEEN 20220401 AND 20220430

Mean bias of 2 m Temperature (C) Date: BETWEEN 20220501 AND 20220531

Mean bias of 2 m Temperature (C) Date: BETWEEN 20220601 AND 20220630

•• v* 'V '

JU 0 ฆ	•	*' 		„*ป •

ft' .: • v'

: ; . . '

. i - iif • 2 • v '. * *



ฆ* **0



. *>
A \

VV •

•	-3

•	-2

•	-1

•	-0.5

•	-0.25
0

0.25
0.5

•	1

•	2

•	3

Figure 3.2.16. Spatial distribution of temperature bias (C) across daytime hours for the months
of April, May, and June (top to bottom) for the 12US domain.

51


-------
Mean bias of 2 m Temperature (C) Date: BETWEEN 20220701 AND 20220731

~ • ,f, ป N

. ~ r -I/

*.j.	,-f.

&

, •. v • •— y.v >• ,Lt: • ;jt
/<

ฆ - • ? •• •—• - , ฆ	 • v

r t- -• ^ t ฆ ^ - ,ซ
L . •. * . ' J*

i , -	•

• * v / t *y .

1

TV

-3

-2

-1

-0.5

-0.25

0

0.25
0.5

1

2

3

Mean bias of 2 m Temperature (C) Date: BETWEEN 20220801 AND 20220831



i

. Ef--: *

>•* v* \v?	, •*, •* •*':?4 .	\-. i J **•

v. <-ฆ>

v\'

•	-3

•	-2

•	-1

•	-0.5

•	-0.25
0

0.25
0.5

•	1

•	2

•	3

Mean bias of 2 m Temperature (C) Date: BETWEEN 20220901 AND 20220930

	mean Dias orzm temperature (t..} uaie: et i wee

•* • *•ป. • *• r\ * •
* * .5 • •

• •	" • • ฃ	o V,\

*: •. • . %

%y.TST>ซr
U *

I J *0

Figure 3.2.17. Spatial distribution of temperature bias (C) across daytime hours for the months
of July, August, and September (top to bottom) for the 12US domain.

52


-------
Mean bias of 2 m Temperature (C) Date: BETWEEN 20221001 AND 20221031

Figure 3.2.18. Spatial distribution of temperature bias (C) across daytime hours for the months
of October, November, and December (top to bottom) for the 12US domain.

53


-------

-------
Figure 3.2.19. Hourly average distribution of observed arid predicted temperatures (K) for the
12US domain in the Northeast, Northwest, Northern Rockies & Plains, Ohio Valley, South,
Southeast, Southwest, Upper Midwest, and West Climate Regions (respectively, top to bottom)
for each quarter.

55


-------
Climate Region

Season

Mean
Obs

Mean
Mod

MAE

MB

NMB

NME

RMSE

Northeast

Q1

273.15

272.96

1.71

-0.19

-0.07

0.63

2.27

Q2

288.21

288.25

1.39

0.04

0.01

0.48

1.88

Q3

294.68

294.96

1.3

0.28

0.1

0.44

1.8

Q4

279.9

280.02

1.6

0.11

0.04

0.57

2.12

N. Rockies & Plains

Q1

269.78

269.55

2.08

-0.24

-0.09

0.77

2.69

Q2

285.6

285.73

1.48

0.14

0.05

0.52

1.98

Q3

294.53

294.87

1.48

0.34

0.12

0.5

2.01

Q4

273.17

273.33

1.99

0.16

0.06

0.73

2.63

Northwest

Q1

276.42

276.44

1.85

0.02

0.01

0.67

2.48

Q2

284.58

284.64

1.43

0.06

0.02

0.5

1.91

Q3

293.59

293.86

1.69

0.27

0.09

0.58

2.26

Q4

277.92

278.27

1.86

0.35

0.13

0.67

2.49

Ohio Valley

Q1

274.91

274.75

1.49

-0.16

-0.06

0.54

1.94

Q2

290.97

291.12

1.36

0.14

0.05

0.47

1.77

Q3

295.7

296.1

1.18

0.39

0.13

0.4

1.59

Q4

280.14

280.06

1.47

-0.08

-0.03

0.53

1.9

South

Q1

281.95

282.01

1.74

0.06

0.02

0.62

2.22

Q2

296.65

296.79

1.27

0.14

0.05

0.43

1.72

Q3

300.69

300.95

1.12

0.25

0.08

0.37

1.57

Q4

286.23

286.35

1.58

0.12

0.04

0.55

2.08

Southeast

Q1

284.29

284.28

1.59

-0.01

0

0.56

2.06

Q2

295.05

295.2

1.28

0.15

0.05

0.43

1.71

Q3

298.35

298.67

1.19

0.32

0.11

0.4

1.62

Q4

286.86

286.95

1.53

0.09

0.03

0.53

2

Southwest

Q1

275.72

275.75

2.17

0.04

0.01

0.79

2.89

Q2

290.26

290.27

1.94

0.02

0.01

0.67

2.61

Q3

295.8

296.17

1.81

0.37

0.13

0.61

2.45

Q4

278.61

278.94

2.02

0.33

0.12

0.73

2.67

Upper Midwest

Q1

266.51

266.18

1.72

-0.33

-0.12

0.64

2.29

Q2

286.17

286.28

1.43

0.11

0.04

0.5

1.91

Q3

292.9

293.33

1.28

0.43

0.15

0.44

1.71

Q4

274.91

274.93

1.55

0.02

0.01

0.56

2.01

West

Q1

283.82

283.85

1.86

0.03

0.01

0.65

2.49

Q2

291.58

291.42

1.71

-0.17

-0.06

0.59

2.31

Q3

297.2

297.07

1.7

-0.13

-0.04

0.57

2.31

Q4

285.12

285.37

1.76

0.25

0.09

0.62

2.38

Table 3.2.1. Mean observed, mean modeled, mean absolute error (MAE), mean bias (MB),
normalized mean bias (NMB), normalized mean error (NME), and root mean square error
(RMSE) for temperature (K) for the 12US domain.


-------
3.3 Model Performance for Mixing Ratio

Water mixing ratio estimates are compared to the ds472 observation network described earlier
and are presented below for the 36NOAM (Figure 3.3.1) and 12US (Figure 3.3.2) domains.
Regional analysis of statistical metrics for water vapor mixing ratio performance by quarter is
shown in Table 3.3.1 for the 12US domain only.

Mixing ratio is generally overpredicted across most hours of the day with a greater spread in
the bias in the early morning and evening hours. Increased spread in the bias also occurs during
the late Spring to early Fall when increased moisture levels across the country are noted. In
general, the model error is less than a g/kg across the year and all hours of the day.

The monthly spatial distributions of the mixing ratio bias across all hours are shown for the
36NOAM (Figures 3.3.3-3.3.6) and 12US (Figures 3.3.7-3.3.10) domains. Monthly spatial
distributions of the mixing ratio bias across daytime hours only are shown for the 36NOAM
(Figures 3.3.11-3.3.14) and 12US (Figures 3.3.15-3.3.18) domains. Hourly distributions of the
observed and predicted mixing ratios are shown for each Climate Region and quarter in Figure
3.3.19. As noted in the earlier figures, a general overprediction of moisture is observed across
much of the year, particularly in the Winter and Spring in the eastern US for both the 36NOAM
and 12US domains. An underprediction during the months of September and October is noted
in both domains. In the 12US simulation, there is a noticeable overprediction in the southeast
during July. Some slight variations appear across regions, with a noticeable underprediction of
moisture that persists across the Southeast for much of the year. During daytime hours only,
there is an underprediction during the late Spring months through the Summer period in both
the 36NOAM and 12US simulations. The slight overprediction during the Winter and late Fall
periods persists during the daytime hours, as well.

57


-------
Mixing Ratio Bias

! ! ! ! ; 1 .TTTTTTTTTT, j ; ! ! !

8 0 s s s a $ $ $ $ $ $ 6 $ e s s a b s s B B B

! | 			! | 1 • i i i i 1

1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	T	T	1	1	1—

0 1 2 3 4 5 0 7 8 9 ID 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 10 20 21 22 23

Hour of day (GMT)

Mixing Ratio Bias

- - 4= ^ X

rn

cJzi



^ ^ ^ 1.

UJ

L-l

i

i i r—i -——j 1 i '

! 1 —L—

Mixing Ratio Error

-r-

-r-

-p



i
i

a

i
i

H

a

i
i

B



T

-r-

1

J

1

F

i

M

1

A

1

M

i

j

mon

I

j

i

A

1

S

1

o

1

N

1

D









Mixing Ratio Fractional Bias









T

T

^ T

-









_T_





















-J-

-1-







n	1	i	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	r

J	FMAMJ	JASOND

Mixing Ratio Fractional Error

mon

Figure 3.3,1. Distribution of hourly bias by hour and hourly bias, error, fractional bias, and
fractional error for water vapor mixing ratio by month for the 36NOAM domain.

58


-------
Mixing Ratio Bias

_g_$-

H -0 0- 0

n	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	r~

0 1 2 3 4 5 8 7 8 9 ID 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

Hour of day (GMT)

Mixing Ratio Bias





-r-

ir*™ 1—11—1 r~—' 1—1—1 ' '

" L+J '—i—1 1—,-J C=l

—i—

^ "t3 T ^ ^

-J6 o

~r

M

Mixing Ratio Error

8
8

Mixing Ratio Fractional Bias

-T"
M

Mixing Ratio Fractional Error

Figure 3.3.2. Distribution of hourly bias by hour and hourly bias, error, fractional bias, and
fractional error for water vapor mixing ratio by month for the 12US domain.

59


-------
Mean bias of Mixing Ratio (g/kg) Date: BETWEEN 20220101 AND 20220131

Figure 3.3.3. Spatial distribution of water vapor mixing ratio bias (g/kg) across ail hours for the
months of January, February, and March (top to bottom) for the 36NOAM domain.

60


-------
Mean bias of Mixing Ratio (g/kg) Date: BETWEEN 20220401 AND 20220430



Mean bias of Mixing Ratio (g/kg) Date: BETWEEN 20220501 AND 20220531



• -JrlP:

• a •

wv* * %

ฎx.-/y

AN V

.'v

•	-3

•	-2

•	-1

•	-0.5

•	-0.25
0

0.25
0.5

•	1

•	2

•	3

Mean bias of Mixing Ratio (g/kg) Date: BETWEEN 20220601 AND 20220630

* V J *,

V-i>

-3

-2

-1

-0.5

-0.25

0

0.25
0.5

1

2

3

Figure 3.3.4. Spatial distribution of water vapor mixing ratio bias (g/kg) across all hours for the
months of April, May, and June (top to bottom) for the 36NOAM domain.

61


-------
Mean bias of Mixing Ratio (g/kg) Date: BETWEEN 20220701 AND 20220731

Mean bias of Mixing Ratio (g/kg) Date: BETWEEN 20220901 AND 20220930

Figure 3.3.5. Spatial distribution of water vapor mixing ratio bias (g/kg) across all hours for the
months of July, August, and September (top to bottom) for the 36NOAM domain.

62


-------
Mean bias of Mixing Ratio (g/kg) Date: BETWEEN 20221001 AND 20221031

. Q 2 %J\
. ** •• * •• • ^

' • >"T>_ 1 M- V - ^ - &J&

Figure 3.3.6, Spatial distribution of water vapor mixing ratio bias (g/kg) across all hours for the
months of October, November, and December (top to bottom) for the 36NOAM domain.

63


-------
Mean bias of Mixing Ratio (g/kg) Date: BETWEEN 20220101 AND 20220131

Mean bias of Mixing Ratio (g/kg) Date: BETWEEN 20220301 AND 20220331

Figure 3.3.7. Spatial distribution of water vapor mixing ratio bias (g/kg) across all hours for the
months of January, February, and March (top to bottom) for the 121IS domain.

64


-------
Mean bias of Mixing Ratio (g/kg) Date: BETWEEN 20220501 AND 20220531

Mean bias of Mixing Ratio (g/kg) Date: BETWEEN 20220601 AND 20220630

Figure 3.3.8. Spatial distribution of water vapor mixing ratio bias (g/kg) across all hours for the
months of April, May, and June (top to bottom) for the 12US domain.

65


-------
Mean bias of Mixing Ratio (g/kg) Date: BETWEEN 20220701 AND 20220731



> A ti*. . • vK'i * * . *ซ?

—j.	sCnViV. •:• w-i

, w	"	ฆ• * m~ 0m	V/^"—	-

s. w .$f

•	-3

•	-2

•	-1

•	-0.5

•	-0.25
0

0.25
0.5

•	1

•	2

•	3

Mean bias of Mixing Ratio (g/kg) Date: BETWEEN 20220801 AND 20220831

X* * t

cv-r

>AAi- r^4r	•

**• •* ' . ^".
A * I* v t.	1 * %i <

... ....

'i.V-*Wr* A

?>

'J -

* - f\\-

-3

•	-2

•	-1

•	-0.5

•	-0.25
0

0.25
0.5

•	1

•	2

•	3

Mean bias of Mixing Ratio (g/kg) Date: BETWEEN 20220901 AND 20220930

"1

j

%>ฆ::*ป. -• • ฐ *, • •/ •• • ,

t" ? 2*—{

Figure 3.3.9, Spatial distribution of water vapor mixing ratio bias (g/kg) across all hours for the
months of July, August, and September (top to bottom) for the 12US domain.

66


-------
Mean bias of Mixing Ratio (g/kg) Date: BETWEEN 20221001 AND 20221031

Figure 3.3.10. Spatial distribution of water vapor mixing ratio bias (g/kg) across all hours for the
months of October, November, and December (top to bottom) for the 12US domain,

67


-------
Mean bias of Mixing Ratio (g/kg) Date: BETWEEN 20220101 AND 20220131

^ -Kwi

c • [

VL

"ฃv.

•w

Mean bias of Mixing Ratio (g/kg) Date: BETWEEN 20220201 AND 20220228

Figure 3.3.11. Spatial distribution of water vapor mixing ratio bias (g/kg) across daytime hours
for the months of January, February, and March (top to bottom) for the 36NOAM domain.

68


-------
Mean bias of Mixing Ratio (g/kg) Date: BETWEEN 20220401 AND 20220430

-K-





_jC

"; i/ , r'i



\\ v 1 j* /i, v ฆ >

c



y ซv

Mean bias of Mixing Ratio (g/kg) Date: BETWEEN 20220501 AND 20220531

Figure 3.3.12. Spatial distribution of water vapor mixing ratio bias (g/kg) across daytime hours
for the months of April, May, and June (top to bottom) for the 36NOAM domain.

69


-------
Mean bias of Mixing Ratio (g/kg) Date: BETWEEN 20220701 AND 20220731

Mean bias of Mixing Ratio (g/kg) Date: BETWEEN 20220801 AND 20220831

Figure 3.3.13. Spatial distribution of water vapor mixing ratio bias (g/kg) across daytime hours
for the months of July, August, and September (top to bottom) for the 36NOAM domain.

70


-------
Mean bias of Mixing Ratio (g/kg) Date: BETWEEN 20221001 AND 20221031

a.; f ; *• 1	f

A.ir! rilfc



Figure 3.3.14, Spatial distribution of water vapor mixing ratio bias (g/kg) across daytime hours
for the months of October, November, and December (top to bottom) for 36NOAM domain.

71


-------
Mean bias of Mixing Ratio (g/kg) Date: BETWEEN 20220101 AND 20220131

Figure 3.3.15. Spatial distribution of water vapor mixing ratio bias (g/kg) across daytime hours
for the months of January, February, and March (top to bottom) for the 12US domain.

72


-------
Mean bias of Mixing Ratio (g/kg) Date: BETWEEN 20220401 AND 20220430

Figure 3.3.16. Spatial distribution of water vapor mixing ratio bias (g/kg) across daytime hours
for the months of April, May, and June (top to bottom) for the 12US domain.

73


-------
Mean bias of Mixing Ratio (g/kg) Date: BETWEEN 20220701 AND 20220731

Mean bias of Mixing Ratio (g/kg) Date: BETWEEN 20220901 AND 20220930

Figure 3.3.17. Spatial distribution of water vapor mixing ratio bias (g/kg) across daytime hours
for the months of July, August, and September (top to bottom) for the 12US domain.

74


-------
Mean bias of Mixing Ratio (g/kg) Date: BETWEEN 20221001 AND 20221031

; vV: •' v

I I •

<3*—• iซ I ฎ—•	—rfc—\

— - I ซ k	" * -,% ฆ t- '	o

I *. • •	: • • .x*. * 4 ,h iSK

* * ฆ ** •• s. V"\JI

' •'* v.-

-i* aO,

^W" ฆ>

Mean bias of Mixing Ratio (g/kg) Date: BETWEEN 20221101 AND 20221130

• <

1

• •lffc

ฆ Mt ฆ	* .ป •VnEBW I

"•ป•]#* • • i? — Av -

WHX ^

V.

• i *.	1	V\%'

.	x *r > ^ <

	4 r	V	' .	' *. \\

•i	V .y:^r' \>

' • *• ••;•
•W" ป' ' 3

•>f -••

• 4PY



•	-3

•	-2

•	-1

•	-0.5

•	-0.25
0

0.25
0.5

•	1

•	2

•	3

Mean bias of Mixing Ratio (g/kg) Date: BETWEEN 20221201 AND 20221231

% •

t

> - • - !	- r ฆ

^ . . vfi • i*vwOsi?	.v

		l ___ 1 ^ '	> -r x



>,

l-iVW .	_

-*ซS5&i • #

•T ฆ:;,

-3

-2

-1

-0.5

-0.25

0

0.25
0.5

1

2

3

Figure 3.3.18. Spatial distribution of water vapor mixing ratio bias (g/kg) across daytime hours
for the months of October, November, and December (top to bottom) for the 12US domain.

75


-------
76


-------
\

Figure 3.3.19. Hourly average distribution of observed arid water vapor mixing ratios (g/kg) for
the 12LJS domain in the Northeast, Northwest, Northern Rockies & Plains, Ohio Valley, South,
Southeast, Southwest, Upper Midwest, and West Climate Regions (respectively, top to bottom)
for each quarter.

77


-------
Climate Region

Season

Mean Obs

Mean Mod

MAE

MB

NMB

NME

RMSE

Northeast

Q1

2.98

3.26

0.46

0.28

9.49

15.44

0.65

Q2

7.61

7.82

0.74

0.21

2.8

9.74

1.02

Q3

12

12.1

0.95

0.1

0.82

7.9

1.27

Q4

4.97

5.18

0.56

0.2

4.11

11.33

0.76

N. Rockies & Plains

Q1

2.21

2.53

0.46

0.32

14.6

20.81

0.66

Q2

6.15

6.11

0.83

-0.04

-0.62

13.44

1.21

Q3

9.66

9.56

1.13

-0.1

-1.06

11.68

1.55

Q4

3.08

3.29

0.45

0.21

6.71

14.76

0.66

Northwest

Q1

4.04

4.17

0.52

0.13

3.11

12.9

0.72

Q2

5.79

5.61

0.65

-0.18

-3.17

11.22

0.91

Q3

8.04

8.18

0.97

0.14

1.76

12.03

1.31

Q4

4.5

4.73

0.57

0.23

5.15

12.65

0.77

Ohio Valley

Q1

3.31

3.59

0.51

0.28

8.6

15.39

0.7

Q2

9.23

9.3

0.97

0.07

0.75

10.48

1.32

Q3

13.49

13.35

1.1

-0.14

-1.02

8.17

1.47

Q4

4.78

4.94

0.57

0.16

3.38

11.84

0.78

South

Q1

4.7

4.9

0.63

0.21

4.37

13.35

0.9

Q2

12.13

12.05

1.25

-0.08

-0.64

10.33

1.7

Q3

14.66

14.55

1.24

-0.11

-0.78

8.47

1.64

Q4

7.21

7.35

0.81

0.14

1.93

11.17

1.15

Southeast

Q1

6.33

6.55

0.72

0.22

3.44

11.39

0.97

Q2

11.97

12.16

1.08

0.19

1.57

9.03

1.44

Q3

16.08

16.08

1.24

-0.01

-0.05

7.69

1.63

Q4

8.03

8.02

0.82

-0.01

-0.09

10.16

1.11

Southwest

Q1

2.47

2.87

0.6

0.41

16.44

24.2

0.81

Q2

4.3

4.52

0.89

0.22

5.2

20.79

1.28

Q3

9.36

9.36

1.25

0

0.04

13.34

1.66

Q4

3.79

4.08

0.63

0.29

7.58

16.63

0.84

Upper Midwest

Q1

2.06

2.22

0.35

0.17

8.11

16.9

0.51

Q2

7.02

7.15

0.8

0.13

1.85

11.39

1.18

Q3

11.35

11.31

0.98

-0.04

-0.36

8.66

1.33

Q4

3.77

3.9

0.44

0.13

3.57

11.75

0.64

West

Q1

4.45

4.45

0.7

0.01

0.17

15.73

0.98

Q2

6.25

6.18

0.84

-0.07

-1.09

13.41

1.17

Q3

9.16

9.44

1.12

0.28

3.02

12.17

1.55

Q4

5.6

5.71

0.72

0.11

1.94

12.83

1

Table 3.3.1. Mean observed, mean modeled, mean absolute error (MAE), mean bias (MB),
normalized mean bias (NMB), normalized mean error (NME), and root mean square error
(RMSE) for water vapor mixing ratio (g/kg) for the 12US domain.

78


-------
3.4 Model Performance for Precipitation

Monthly total rainfall is plotted for each grid cell to assess how well the model captures the
spatial variability and magnitude of convective and non-convective rainfall. As described earlier,
the PRISM estimations for rainfall are only within the continental United States. With lightning
assimilation in the 12US simulation mentioned earlier, the model will either trigger (suppress)
convection when lightning is observed (not observed). This assimilation is particularly useful in
constraining the model's convection scheme that at times has been observed to be inaccurately
active. WRF rainfall estimates by month are shown for all grid cells in the domain. Monthly total
estimates are shown in Figures 3.4.1 through 3.4.12 for the 36NOAM domain and Figures 3.4.13
through 3.4.24 for the 12US domain. Domain-wide biases for the 36NOAM and 12US domains
are shown in Table 3.4.1.

Overall, the model captures the general spatial patterns and magnitude of the precipitation
across the US throughout the year. Precipitation is generally underpredicted across the
southern and eastern portions of the US during the spring and winter months. There is a
general overprediction that is noted across the western US and portions of the Plains states,
particularly in areas of complex terrain (e.g., northern CA, the Rockies, etc.), especially during
the Summer months. The overprediction is particularly noticeable in the 36NOAM simulation,
where lightning assimilation data were not used and thus, convective precipitation was
unconstrained (notable domain-wide biases in summer months are up to 0.6" greater in the
36NOAM simulation versus the 12US simulation).

79


-------
Precipitation, January 2022

160

140 -

120 -

100 -

80-

60-

40 -

20-

0--
0

160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0

PRISM

Model

Inches	Inches

Difference

Inches

Figure 3.4.1. PRISM analysis (top left) and WRF (top right) estimated monthly total rainfall (in)
and the difference (bottom) for January for the 36NOAM domain.

80


-------
Precipitation, February 2022

160

140 -

120 -

100 -

80-

60-

40 -

20-

0--
0

PRISM

160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0

Model

Inches	Inches

Difference

Inches

3.4.2. PRISM analysis (top left) and WRF (top right) estimated monthly total rainfall (in) and the
difference (bottom) for February for the 36NOAM domain.

81


-------
Precipitation, March 2022

160

140 -

120 -

100 -

80-

60-

40 -

20-

0--
0

PRISM

160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0

Model

Inches	Inches

Inches

Figure 3.4.3. PRISM analysis (top left) and WRF (top right) estimated monthly total rainfall (in)
and the difference (bottom) for March for the 36NOAM domain.

82


-------
Precipitation, April 2022

160

140 -

120 -

100 -

80-

60-

40 -

20-

0--
0

PRISM

160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0

Model

Inches	Inches

Inches

Figure 3.4.4. PRISM analysis (top left) arid WRF (top right) estimated monthly total rainfall (in)
and the difference (bottom) for April for the 36NOAM domain.

83


-------
Precipitation, May 2022

160

140 -

120 -

100 -

80-

60-

40 -

20-

0--
0

PRISM

160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0

Model

Inches	Inches

Difference

Inches

Figure 3.4.5. PRISM analysis (top left) and WRF (top right) estimated monthly total rainfall (in)
and the difference (bottom) for May for the 36NOAM domain.

84


-------
Precipitation, June 2022

160

140 -

120 -

100 -

80-

60-

40 -

20-

0--
0

PRISM

160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0

Model

Inches	Inches

Inches

Figure 3.4.6. PRISM analysis (top left) and WRF (top right) estimated monthly total rainfall (in)
and the difference (bottom) for June for the 36NOAM domain.

85


-------
Precipitation, July 2022

Difference

Inches

Figure 3.4.7. PRISM analysis (top left) and WRF (top right) estimated monthly total rainfall (in)
and the difference (bottom) for July for the 36NOAM domain.

160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0

Model

86


-------
Precipitation, August 2022

160

140 -

120 -

100 -

80-

60-

40 -

20-

0--
0

PRISM

160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0

Model

Inches	Inches

Difference

Inches

Figure 3.4.8. PRISM analysis (top left) arid WRF (top right) estimated monthly total rainfall (in)
and the difference (bottom) for August for the 36NOAM domain.

87


-------
Precipitation, September 2022

PRISM

Inches	Inches

Difference

160 —

140 -

120 -

100 -
80 -
60 -
40 -
20 -
0-

0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175

Inches

Figure 3.4.9. PRISM analysis (top left) arid WRF (top right) estimated monthly total rainfall (in)
and the difference (bottom) for September for the 36NOAM domain.

Difference

160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0

Model

88


-------
Precipitation, October 2022

160

140 -

120 -

100 -

80-

60-

40 -

20-

0--
0

PRISM

160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0

Model

Inches	Inches

Difference

Inches

Figure 3.4.10. PRISM analysis (top left) and WRF (top right) estimated monthly total rainfall (in)
and the difference (bottom) for October for the 36NOAM domain.

89


-------
Precipitation, November 2022

160

140 -

120 -

100 -

80-

60-

40 -

20-

0--
0

PRISM

160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0

Model

Inches	Inches

Inches

Figure 3.4.11. PRISM analysis (top left) and WRF (top right) estimated monthly total rainfall (in)
and the difference (bottom) for November for the 36NOAM domain.

90


-------
Precipitation, December 2022

PRISM

Model

160

0

25

50

75

100

125

150 175



6	9	12	15

Inches

160

6	9	12 15 18

Inches

Difference

0

25

50

75

100

125

150 175



-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 1 2 3 4 5
Inches

Figure 3.4,12, PRISM analysis (top left) and WRF (top right) estimated monthly total rainfall (in)
and the difference (bottom) for December for the 36NOAM domain.

91


-------
Precipitation, January 2022

PRISM

Model

0

100

1 f ^5 I

200

300

400



9 12
Inches

15 18

0

-sn r, ! r

100 200

300

400



9 12
Inches

15 18

Difference

300
250
200
150
100
50
0

IX

0

100

200

300

400



-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 1 2 3 4 5
Inches

Figure 3.4.13. PRISM analysis (top left) and WRF (top right) estimated monthly total rainfall (in)
and the difference (bottom) for January for the 12US domain.

92


-------
Precipitation, February 2022

-1 1
Inches

Figure 3.4.14. PRISM analysis (top left) and WRF (top right) estimated monthly total rainfall (in)
and the difference (bottom) for February for the 12US domain.

Difference

PRISM

Model

93


-------
Precipitation, March 2022

PRISM	Model

Inches	Inches

300 -
250 -
200 -
150 -
100 -
50 -
0-

0	100	200	300	400

Inches

Figure 3.4.15. PRISM analysis (top left) and WRF (top right) estimated monthly total rainfall (in)
and the difference (bottom) for March for the 12US domain.

Difference

94


-------
Precipitation, April 2022

	;ฆ> •" 1	,—-=

0 100 200 300

400

^—*	1	1	-—



9 12
Inches

15

18

0

-sn f ! r

100 200

300

400



9 12 15
Inches

18

Difference

0

100

200

300

400



-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 1 2 3 4 5
Inches

Figure 3.4.16. PRISM analysis (top left) and WRF (top right) estimated monthly total rainfall (in)
and the difference (bottom) for April for the 12US domain.

95


-------
Precipitation, May 2022

Model

PRISM

9 12
Inches

9 12
Inches

Difference

Inches

Figure 3.4.17. PRISM analysis (top left) and WRF (top right) estimated monthly total rainfall (in)
and the difference (bottom) for May for the 12US domain.

96


-------
Precipitation, June 2022

PRISM

0

100

1 f ^5 I

200

300

400



9 12
Inches

15 18

0

-sn f ! r

100 200

300

400



9 12
Inches

15 18

Difference

WtJ

0

100

; t -a L| i

200

300

400



-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 1 2 3 4 5
Inches

Figure 3.4.18. PRISM analysis (top left) and WRF (top right) estimated monthly total rainfall (in)
and the difference (bottom) for June for the 12US domain.

97


-------
Precipitation, July 2022

PRISM	Model

Inches	Inches

300 -
250 -
200 -
150 -
100 -
50 -
0-

0	100	200	300	400

Inches

Figure 3.4.19. PRISM analysis (top left) and WRF (top right) estimated monthly total rainfall (in)
and the difference (bottom) for July for the 12US domain.

Difference

98


-------
Precipitation, August 2022

PRISM

Figure 3.4.20. PRISM analysis (top left) and WRF (top right) estimated monthly total rainfall (in)
and the difference (bottom) for August for the 12US domain.

Model

9 12
Inches

Difference

9 12
Inches

-1 1
Inches

99


-------
Precipitation, September 2022

9 12
Inches

9 12
Inches

-1 1
Inches

Figure 3.4.21. PRISM analysis (top left) and WRF (top right) estimated monthly total rainfall (in)
and the difference (bottom) for September for the 12US domain.

Difference

PRISM

Model

100


-------
Precipitation, October 2022

9 12
Inches

9 12
Inches

-1 1
Inches

Figure 3.4.22. PRISM analysis (top left) and WRF (top right) estimated monthly total rainfall (in)
and the difference (bottom) for October for the 12US domain.

Difference

PRISM

Model

101


-------
Precipitation, November 2022

PRISM

Model

0

100

1 f ^5 I

200

300

400



9 12
Inches

15 18

0

-sn f ! r

100 200

300

400



9 12 15 18
Inches

Difference

0

100

200

300

400



-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 1 2 3 4 5
Inches

Figure 3.4.23. PRISM analysis (top left) and WRF (top right) estimated monthly total rainfall (in)
and the difference (bottom) for November for the 12US domain.

102


-------
Precipitation, December 2022

PRISM

-1 1
Inches

Figure 3.4.24. PRISM analysis (top left) and WRF (top right) estimated monthly total rainfall (in)
and the difference (bottom) for December for the 12US domain.

Model

9 12
Inches

9 12
Inches

Difference

103


-------
Month

36NOAM

12US

January

0.12

0.19

February

0.09

0.13

March

0.15

0.13

April

0.31

0.16

May

0.24

0.02

June

0.25

0.01

July

0.55

0.02

August

0.56

-0.08

September

0.05

-0.07

October

-0.20

-0.15

November

-0.17

-0.03

December

-0.11

0.06

Table 3.4.1. Domain-wide biases (in inches) of total precipitation in the 36NOAM and 12US
domains by month.

3.5 Model Performance for Solar Radiation

Photosynthetically activated radiation (PAR) is a fraction of shortwave downward radiation and
is an important input for the biogenic emissions model for estimating isoprene (Carlton and
Baker, 2011). Isoprene emissions are important for regional ozone chemistry and play a role in
secondary organic aerosol formation. Radiation performance evaluation also gives an indirect
assessment of how well the model captures cloud formation during daylight hours.

Shortwave downward radiation estimates are compared to surface-based measurements and
shown below for the 36NOAM (Figure 3.5.1) and 12US (Figure 3.5.2) domains6.

In general, WRF slightly overpredicts shortwave radiation across all months of the year,
showing a greater spread in the overprediction during the late Spring to early Fall months.
Overall, the median bias in WRF for all months of the year is roughly 10-20 W/m2.

More variability is noted on an hourly basis as WRF overpredicts shortwave radiation across all
daytime hours. The median bias during the hours of most downward shortwave radiation is less
than 10-20 W/m2. A greater spread in the overprediction is noted during the afternoon to early
evening hours when the sun is highest in the sky. The model's inability to accurately simulate
sub grid clouds at both the 36km and 12km resolution is likely the cause of these errors.

6 As noted above, the 12US WRF simulation used lightning data assimilation whereas the 36NOAM WRF simulation
did not.

104


-------
Shortwave Radiation Bias: 36NOAM

Month

Shortwave Radiation Bias: 36NOAM

T

*r |

T 1 ,

T T ! ฆ !

0 q o	, *oq000G-

T T

* !

•	i

•	i

•	i
ซ i

g n

T

* T

A P

' 1 i i ป i : ฆ i

i * ^ i ! i ;

" - i i

_L

< >
4 '

*

1 i J

• 1

1 '
J-

r

i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i—i	1—i—i—i—i—r

00 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22

Hour of day (GMT)

Figure 3.5.1. Distribution of hourly bias for shortwave radiation (W/m2) by month (top) and by
hour of the day (bottom) for the 36NOAM domain.

105


-------
Shortwave Radiation Bias: 12US 2022 w/ Lightning

c\j
E

03

5

Month

Shortwave Radiation Bias: 12US 2022 w/ Lightning

T

1 T
1 T 1

! J i 7 !

0 fl A * , I iphO

ฆ
a

4
i

i r

~ E

r

T

1
i
1
4

4

a

i

i

I T -|
ป 1

0BF



! i * 1 : : ;

i - - i ;

_L

LJ L

i
i

a
a
a

.

i

a

i
i
i
i

L "*ฆ

T i

i



~i	1	i	1	1	1	1	1—i	1	1	1	1	i	1	1	1—i	1	r

00 01 02 03 04 05 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

Hour of day (GMT)

Figure 3.5.2. Distribution of hourly bias for shortwave radiation (W/rrs2) by month (top) and by
hour of the day (bottom) for the 12US domain.

4 CLIMATE REPRESENTATIVENESS OF 2022

Figures 4,1 and 4.2 show the divisional rankings for observed temperatures across the US for
2022. A climatic representation of the precipitation for 2022 is shown in Figures 4.3 and 4.4.
These types of plots are used to determine whether the meteorological conditions in a specific
year are near-normal or anomalous. Additionally, we can make determinations of their
suitability for use in photochemical modeling in terms of a specific year's conduciveness for
photochemical production of secondary pollutants.

In 2022, temperatures were average to above average for most months of the year. Much
below average temperatures were noted in the Northwest and Northern Plains during April.
Much above average temperatures were noted in the South in April through June. Record or

106


-------
near-record warmth was observed in the Northeast in August, as well as various portions of the
West, Northwest, and Southern Plains during July through October.

With regards to precipitation, 2022 was highly variable in terms of record to near-record
drought or rainfall amounts. Much of the year, most of the country varied between below
average to above average rainfall amounts, with no discernible pattern that persisted through
any season or region. Record dry conditions were noted in California during January, May, and
July. Record wet conditions were noted in the Northern Plains during December.

107


-------
Divisional Average Temperature Ranks

January 2022

Period: 1895-2022

Record Much Betow Near Above	Much Record

Coldest Betow Average Average Average	Above Warmest

Average	Average

Divisional Average Temperature Ranks

March 2022

Period: 1895-2022

Much	Betow	Near	Above	Much

Below	Average Average Average	Above

Average	Average

Divisional Average Temperature Ranks

May 2022

Period: 1895-2022

Divisional Average Temperature Ranks

February 2022

Period: 1895-2022

Much	Betow	Near	Above	Much

Betow Average Average Average Above
Average	Average

Divisional Average Temperature Ranks

April 2022

Much	Beiow	Near	Above	Much

Below	Average Average Average	Above

Average	Average

Divisional Average Temperature Ranks

June 2022

Period: 1895-2022

Record	Much	Betow	Near	Above	Much	Record	Record	Much	Betow	Near	Above	Much	Record

Coldest	Below	Average Average Average	Above	Warmest	Coldest	Beiow	Average Average Average	Above	Warmest

Average	Average	Average	Average

Figure 4.1 Climatic temperature rankings by climate division: January	to June 2022.

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/temp-and-precip/maps.php

108


-------
Divisional Average Temperature Ranks

July 2022

Period-1895-2022

Divisional Average Temperature Ranks

August 2022

Period: 1895-2022

Divisional Average Temperature Ranks

September 2022

Period: 1895-2022

Record	Much	Betow	Near	Above	Much	Recwd

Coldest	Below	Average Average Average	Above	Warmest

Average	Average

Divisional Average Temperature Ranks

November 2022

Period: 1895-2022

Average

Average

Divisional Average Temperature Ranks

October 2022

Period: 1895-2022

Record	Mud)	Below	Near	Above	Much	Record

Coldest	Below	Average Average Average	Above	Warmest

Average	Average

Divisional Average Temperature Ranks

December 2022

Period: 1895-2022

Record	Much	Betow	Near	Above	Much	Recwd

Coldest	Below	Average Average Average	Above	Warmest

Average	Average

Record	Much	Below	Near	Above	Mud)	Recotd

Coldest	Below	Average Average Average	Above	Warmest

Average	Average

Figure 4.2 Climatic temperature rankings by climate division: July to December 2022.

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/temp-and-precip/maps.php

109


-------
Divisional Precipitation Ranks

January 2022

Period: 1895-2022

Divisional Precipitation Ranks

Divisional Precipitation Ranks

March 2022

Period: 1895-2022

Divisional Precipitation Ranks

April 2022

Period: 1895-2022

Record	Much	Betow	Near	Above	Much	Record

Driest	Below	Average Average Average	Above	Wettest

Average	Average

Divisional Precipitation Ranks

May 2022

Period: 1895-2022

Record	Much	Beiow	Near	Above	Much

Dries)	Betow	Average Average Average	Above

Average	Average

Divisional Precipitation Ranks

P



%

X

ฉ

Record	Much	Betow	Near	Above	Much	Record

Driest	Below	Average Average Average	Above	Wettest

Average	Average

Record	Much	Beiow	Near	Above	Much

Driest	Below	Average Average Average	Above

Average	Average

Figure 4.3 Climatic rainfall rankings by climate division: January to June 2022.

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/temp-and-precip/maps.php

110


-------
Divisional Precipitation Ranks

July 2022

Period-1895-2022

Divisional Precipitation Ranks

August 2022

Period: 1895-2022

Divisional Precipitation Ranks

September 2022

Period: 1895-2022

Divisional Precipitation Ranks

October 2022

Period: 1895-2022

Record Much Betow	Near Above	Much Record

Driest Below Average	Average Average	Above Wettest

Average	Average

Divisional Precipitation Ranks

Period: 1895-2022

Record	Much	Beiow	Near	Above	Much

Dries)	Betow	Average Average Average	Above

Average	Average

Divisional Precipitation Ranks

December 2022

Period: 1895-2022

Record	Much	Betow	Near	Above	Much	Record

Driest	Below	Average Average Average	Above	Wettest

Average	Average

Record	Much	Beiow	Near	Above	Much

Driest	Below	Average Average Average	Above

Average	Average

Figure 4.4 Climatic rainfall rankings by climate division: July to December 2022.

https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/

111


-------
5 REFERENCES

Boylan, J.W., Russell, A.G., 2006. PM and light extinction model performance metrics, goals, and
criteria for three-dimensional air quality models. Atmospheric Environment 40, 4946-4959.

Carlton, A.G., Baker, K.R., 2011. Photochemical Modeling of the Ozark Isoprene Volcano:
MEGAN, BEIS, and Their Impacts on Air Quality Predictions. Environmental Science &
Technology 45, 4438-4445.

Cooper, O.R., Stohl, A., Hubler, G., Hsie, E.Y., Parrish, D.D., Tuck, A.F., Kiladis, G.N., Oltmans, S.J.,
Johnson, B.J., Shapiro, M., Moody, J.L., Lefohn, A.S., 2005. Direct Transport of Midlatitude
Stratospheric Ozone into the Lower Troposphere and Marine Boundary Layer of the Pacific
Ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research - Atmospheres 110, D23310,
doi:10.1029/2005JD005783.

ENVIRON, 2008. User's Guide Comprehensive Air Quality Model with Extensions. ENVIRON
International Corporation, Novato.

Gilliam, R.C., Pleim, J.E., 2010. Performance Assessment of New Land Surface and Planetary
Boundary Layer Physics in the WRF-ARW. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology 49,
760-774.

Heath, Nicholas K., Pleim, J.E., Gilliam, R., Kang, D., 2016. A simple lightning assimilation
technique for improving retrospective WRF simulations. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth
Systems. 8. 10.1002/2016MS000735.

Langford, A.O., Reid, S.J., 1998. Dissipation and Mixing of a Small-Scale Stratospheric Intrusion
in the UpperTroposphere. Journal of Geophysical Research 103, 31265-31276.

Otte, T.L., Pleim, J.E., 2010. The Meteorology-Chemistry Interface Processor (MCIP) for the
CMAQ modeling system: updates through MCIPv3.4.1. Geoscientific Model Development 3,
243-256.

Skamarock, W.C., Klemp, J.B., Dudhia, J., Gill, D.O., Barker, D.M., Duda, M.G., Huang, X., Wang,
W., Powers, J.G., 2008. A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3.

Stammer, D., F.J. Wentz, and C.L. Gentemann, 2003, Validation of Microwave Sea Surface
Temperature Measurements for Climate Purposes, J. Climate, 16, 73-87.

112


-------
United States	Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards	Publication No. EPA-454/R-24-001

Environmental Protection	Air Quality Assessment Division	March 2024

Agency	Research Triangle Park, NC

113


-------