»EPA

Potential Local to Regional Scale Impacts from Wildfire Re-emission of
Hypothetical Radiological Contamination Incidents

Kirk Baker3, Sang Don Leea, Paul Lemieux3, Scott Hudson3, Wei Min Haob, Stephen Bakerb, Emily Lincoln13 3 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, bU.S. Forest Service

%

www.epa.gov

Background

Modeled Impacts

Modeled Exposure

Wildfire Plume Transport Evaluations for the CMAQ model

Conclusions & Implications

Ambient PM cesium

July episode maximum prediction
x Hypothetical wildfire location

"W

If

Figure at Right. Episode maximum modeled ambient concentration for 137Cs in for the hypothetical Denver scenario and
both Los Angeles hypothetical scenarios. Maximum exposure for each episode at 4 km (left column) and 1 km (right
column).

Figure below. Model domains for Denver (left) and California (right).
The extent shown for each region represents the entirety of the 4 km
square sized grid cell domain. The 1 km domains are shown as
dashed black lines. Color contours show terrain height.

Figure above. Distribution of hourly maximum
modeled ambient PM2.5 and coarse PM
137Cs by distance from the wildfire.

Acknowledgements: The authors would like to recognize the contributions of James Beidler, Chris Allen, Lara Reynolds, Kathy Brehme, Luke Valin, Jim Szykeman

Disclaimer: This poster has been subjected to the Agency's review and has been approved for publication. Note that approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views of the Agency.
Mention of trade names, products, or services does not convey official EPA approval, endorsement, or recommendation.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards

Separate evaluation has been done comparing CMAQ-predicted wildfire smoke plumes against satellite products (left), aircraft chemical measurements
(center), and lidar plume top measurements (right). These studies suggest the modeling system does well at representing local to regional scale smoke
transport and vertical placement of smoke plumes (Baker et al, 2018; Zhou et al, 2018). Not shown, but the modeling system also does well representing
the surface mixing layer height in southern California and Denver compared to lidar based measurements.

While ambient concentrations tended to be highest near the fire, highest exposure (person-rems) was downwind where wind flows moved
smoke to high population areas.

Seasonal variations in meteorology (wind flows) can result in differential population impacts even in the same metropolitan area.

Modeled hypothetical incident ambient levels 137Cs both near these wild fires and further downwind in nearby urban areas were well below
levels that would necessitate population evacuation or warrant other protective action recommendations such as shelter-in-place.

These results suggest that 1) decontamination efforts focused on forests should not be elevated in priority solely based on potential
downwind exposures due to future wildfires in the contaminated area and 2) firefighters would not be expected to be at elevated risk from
137Cs re-emission.

Radiological release incidents can potentially contaminate wide areas with radiological materials.
Decontamination efforts are typically focused on populated areas which means radionuclides may be left
in forested areas for long periods of time. Large wildfires in contaminated forested areas have the
potential to reintroduce these radionuclides into the atmosphere and cause exposure risks to first
responders and downwind communities. The most notable radionuclide contaminant released from
radiological incidents is radiocesium (137Cs) due to high yields and long half-life of 30.2 years. An
Eulerian 3D photochemical transport model was used to estimate potential ambient impacts of 137Cs re-
emission due to wildfire following hypothetical radiological release scenarios.

The Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model
was applied to estimate local to regional scale 137Cs
impacts for an area covering northern Colorado and
southern California using 4 km sized grid cells.
Emissions from a large hypothetical wildfire were
introduced into the wildland-urban interface (WUI)
impacted by a previous hypothetical radiological release
event. Episodes were selected to capture typical fire
seasons in these areas.

For modeling purposes, laboratory based particulate
matter (PM) 133Cs emission factors were adjusted
downward based on a comparison of the laboratory
measurements of 133Cs in the initial fuel with multiple
Hypothetical Los Angeles Scenario sources of P°st-incident 137Cs litter fuel contamination

levels measured near Fukushima and Chernobyl.

PM Cs emissions were based on a laboratory study that examined the partitioning of 133Cs (a stable, non-radioactive isotope of Cs) between airborne
particulate matter and residual non-entrained ash when pine needles and peat were doped with Cs. Table 1 provides information used to generate PM
133Cs emissions, which include laboratory experiments measuring fuel, 133Cs content of the fuel, and 133Cs measured in the air as a rate of mass per
fuel burned (g133Cs/kg litter burned). Table 1 includes measurements reported in Hao et al., (2018) and additional measurements performed in 2018 at
the same facility following methods described in Hao et al., (2018).

Table 1. Laboratory measurement data.

Left: Picture of fire
emissions testing at
Missoula Fire Sciences
laboratory burn chamber
(schematic at right)

Kirk Baker I

baker.kirk@epa.gov

U- o
mBq/m3

-	100

-	o
JmBq/m3

Figure at right. Episode maximum values of PM2.5
cesium dosage, population, and population exposure
shown for the Denver (top row) and June Los Angeles
(bottom row) hypothetical scenarios.

Figure below. The difference in episode maximum
values of PM2.5 cesium dosage (left) and population
exposure (right) are shown between the June and Fall
Los Angeles hypothetical scenarios. Warm colors
indicate higher levels in the summer scenario and
cool colors show higher levels in the fall scenario.

Population Weighted Exposure

Population

x Hypothetical wildfire fecation

Hypothetical Denver Scenario

•	Baker, K., Woody, M., Valin, L., Szykman, J., Yates, E., Iraci, L., Choi, H., Soja, A., Koplitz, S., Zhou, L., 2018. Photochemical model evaluation of 2013 California wild fire air quality impacts
using surface, aircraft, and satellite data. Science of The Total Environment 637, 1137-1149.

•	Hao, W.M., Baker, S., Lincoln, E., Hudson, S., Lee, S.D., Lemieux, P., 2018. Cesium emissions from laboratory fires. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 68, 1211-1223.

•	Zhou, L., Baker, K.R., Napelenok, S.L., Pouliot, G., Elleman, R., O'Neill, S.M., Urbanski, S.P., Wong, D.C., 2018. Modeling crop residue burning experiments to evaluate smoke emissions and
plume transport. Science of The Total Environment 627, 523-533.


-------