,rs*r~'
%

Indicator Reference Sheet - March 6, 2022

Population Demographics

Indicator Names

• % Low-income Population in Watershed (WS)

% Minority Population in Watershed (WS)

% < High School Educated Population in Watershed (WS)
% Linguistically Isolated Population in Watershed (WS)
% Vulnerable Age Group Population in Watershed (WS)

Indicator Description
Background

Demographics describe the socioeconomic characteristics
of a group of people. Demographics are used by
researchers and practitioners to help understand the
vulnerability of a population to pollution and
environmental degradation.1

What the Indicators Measure

These indicators describe five demographic characteristics
of the population that resides in a HUC12 subwatershedi*

•	% Low-Income Population in Watershed (WS) -
population living in a household with low-income. Low-
income is defined as a household income that is less
than or equal to twice the federal poverty level.1
Reported as a percentage of the total population in the
HUC12 with known household income (Figure 1).

•	% Minority Population in WS - population in a
minority group. Minority groups include individuals
who define their race as other than white alone and/or
list their ethnicity as Hispanic or Latino.1 In other
words, all people other than non-Hispanic white-alone
individuals.1 Reported as a percentage of the total
population in the HUC12.

•	% < High School Educated Population in WS -
population that is age 25 or older with less than a high
school degree. Reported as a percentage of the age 25
or older population in the HUC12.

•	% Linguistically Isolated Population in WS -
population living in a household that is linguistically
isolated. Households in which all members age 14
years and over speak a non-English language and also
speak English less than 'very well' are considered
linguistically isolated.1 Reported as a percentage of
total households in the HUC12.

•	% Vulnerable Age Group Population WS - population
that is under age 5 or over age 65. Reported as a
percentage of the total population in the HUC12.

Relevance to Water Quality Restoration and Protection
These indicators measure the same demographic
characteristics selected for use in the EPA Environmental
Justice Mapping and Screening Tool (EJSCREEN).1
Demographic characteristics serve as very general

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Indicator Category | >OCial
Subcategory | Community Context
Available in RPS Tool files for all lower 48 states

% of Total Population

>90%

Figure 1. Map of % Low-Income Population in Watershed

for HUC12s in the contiguous US.

indicators of a community's potential vulnerability to be
impacted by pollution and environmental degradation.1
Other environmental justice tools and studies have also
used these demographic characteristics to estimate the
vulnerability of human populations to pollution and
hazardous materials.3,4

individuals may be more vulnerable to health issues when
they lack financial resources, language skills, or education
that would help them avoid exposure to pollutants or
obtain treatment.1 Certain demographic groups like
minority or low-income populations may also be more
likely to live near rivers and lakes with poor water quality5
or lack access to clean drinking water.6-7 Such inequalities
can be considered when selecting priority areas for water
quality and restoration efforts.

These indicators can be included in screenings to identify
priority HUC12s for restoration and protection where
disadvantaged or underserved communities may be
affected by degraded water quality. The demographic
indicators can be used with additional indicators to
understand the environmental conditions that surround
potentially disadvantaged or underserved communities.
For example, indicators of impaired waters can be
reviewed with the demographic indicators to identify

* HUC12s are subwatershed delineations in the National Watershed Boundary Dataset. HUC12s are referenced by their 12-digit
Hydrologic Unit Code.


-------
Population Demographics

HUC12s where waters with known water quality issues
and demographic groups of interest both occur.

Processing Method

These indicators are calculated from demographic data
reported in the US Census Bureau 2014-2018 American
Community Survey (ACS) five-year summary file. The ACS
is a demographics survey program conducted by the IJS
Census Bureau to more regularly gather information that
was historically only collected as part of the decennial
census.

EPA has cleaned and summarized ACS demographic
characteristics by Block Group as part of the EJSCREEN
Tool.1 Block Groups are distinct geographic units that are
used by the US Census Bureau for publishing population
and demographic data. Block Group boundaries are
determined by population size. Block Groups in dense,
urban areas consist of a few city blocks, but in rural,
sparsely populated areas, Block Groups can cover
thousands of square miles.

Figure 2. Overlay map of Block Groups and an example HUC12
(yellow outline) to demonstrate that a Block Group can extend
across multiple HUC12s.

For Block Groups that extend across multiple HUC12s
(Figure 2), a method was applied to distribute Block Group
demographic counts between the intersecting HUC12s.

This distribution method used the EPA EnviroAtlas
Dasymetric Population for the Conterminous United States
dataset, a gridded map layer of population density across
the contiguous US at 30-meter resolution. The dasymetric
population map layer was created from information on
land cover and slope to map areas where humans are
most likely to reside. The general process for quantifying
HUC12 values of demographic indicators included the
following steps:

1.	Overlay Census Block Groups, HUC12s, and the
dasymetric population map layer to calculate the total
population of each Block Group and each Block Group-
HUC12 intersection

2.	Calculate a "population weight" for each Block Group-
HUC12 intersection area as: total population in the
intersecting area divided by total population in the
Census Block Group

3.	Using the population weights from the previous step,
calculate demographic counts per Block Group-HUC12
intersection as: demographic count for the Block
Group times population weight

4.	Calculate the demographic count per HUC12 as the
sum of demographic counts in each Block Group-
HUC12 intersection.

Limitations

•	The demographic count analysis method assumes the
distribution of low income populations, minority
populations, etc. within a Census Block Group follows
the total population distribution within that Census
Block Group.

•	The demographic data generated by the ACS are based
on a sample of the total population within a Block
Group (i.e., the entire population in the Block Group is
not surveyed). ACS sample data are analyzed by the US
Census Bureau to estimate Block Group demographic
counts.

•	The dasymetric population map layer is based on
population totals from the 2010 decennial census and
2006 land cover. Land cover and population changes
that have occurred since those datasets were produced
will not be reflected in the demographic indicators.

•	Demographic characteristics are general indicators of
the vulnerability of a community to degraded
environmental conditions but do not directly measure
community health or levels of exposure to pollutants
and other hazardous materials.

Links to Access Data and Additional Information
HUC12 indicator data can be accessed within Recovery
Potential Screening (RPS) Tool files, available for download
from the EPA RPS website.

Indicator data are also available for download or as web
services on the EPA Watershed Index Online (WSIOi
website.

The demographic data used to calculate these indicators
can be accessed from the EPA EJSCREEN website. The
dasymetric population dataset used to spatially allocate
demographic counts can be accessed from the EPA

Environmental Dataset Gateway.


-------
References

1EPA. 2019. EJSCREEN Technical Documentation.

2EPA. 2021. Environmental Justice. Accessed November 2, 2021.

California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. 2017. CalEnviroScreen 3.0.

4Cutter, S., et al. 2003. Social Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards. Social Science Quarterly 84(2): 242-261.

5Hill, D., et al. 2018. The environment and environmental justice: Linking the biophysical and the social using watershed
boundaries. Applied Geography. 95: 54-60.

6McDonald, ¥,, et al. 2018. Drinking water violations and environmental justice in the United States. 2011-2015. American
Journal of Public Health. 108(10): 1401-1407.

7Schaider, L, et al. 2019. Environmental justice and drinking water quality: are there socioeconomic disparities In nitrate levels
in US drinking water. Environmental Health. 18(1): 1-15.


-------