Catalog of Superfund Program Information Products 1994 November 1994

United States Office of Emergency and

Environmental Protection Remedial Response

Agency Washington, DC 20460

EPA/540/8-91/014
Publication 9200.7-02D
November 199.
-------
SUPERFUND

Invites You

TO VIEW THE NEW SUPERFUND EARLY BIRD
ANNOUNCEMENT WINDOW ON FEDWORLD®

The National Technical Information Service {NTIS) has joined forces with EPA to ensure that
citizen requests for Superfund information are filled rapidly and at the lowest possible cost.

NTIS is the repository of technical publications for the federal government, the largest single source
for public access to federally produced information, and is equipped to reproduce and distribute
publications on a document-by-document or on a standing order basis. All publicly available
Superfund documents from the Office of Emergency and Remedial Response (OERR) can now
be obtained through NTIS.

The Superfund Early Bird Announcement Window allows you to view a listing of Superfund
documents as soon as they are available. It provides abstracts as well as pricing and
ordering information for each item. In order to keep you current, the Window is updated monthly.
The documents are organized so you can quickly and easily access the information you need most:

• Introduction (general information)

• New Documents (listed alphabetically]

• Current Documents (listed alphabetically)

• Information On How To Obtain A Listing And

• Ordering Information For The National Priorities List Sites (by state)

Complete List Of RODs (Records Of Decision - fisted by state and then alphabetically by site name)

To connect to FedWorld®: set modem parity to NONE, Data Bits to 8, and Stop Bit to 1 (N-8-1);
set terminal emulation to ANSI. FedWorld accommodates speeds up to 9600 baud.

To connect to FedWorld through the Internet, telnet to: fedworld.gov. Once you have reached
the main menu, choose "Q" for Quick Bulletins and then type "J" for the Superfund Early Bird
Announcement Window.

-------
EPA/540/8-91/014
Publication 9200.7-02D
November 1994

CATALOG OF
SUPERFUND PROGRAM
INFORMATION PRODUCTS

1994

Office of Emergency and Remedial Response
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, DC 20460

-------
NTIS & EPA

The National Technical Information Service (NTIS),

in cooperation with the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), distributes the fact sheets, directives,
and technical publications needed to respond to
Superfund legislation and makes them available
automatically, as they are issued, weeks before
they are formally announced.

Superfund material is available in the following
seven standing order subscriptions:

* Program Policies and Administration

• Environmental Response and Health and Safety

* Removals and Emergency Response
* Site Assessment and Remediation

* Technology and Analytical Services

• Enforcement
* Records of Decision

An NTIS Deposit Account is easy to acquire.
Call (703) 487-4650 for details.

-------
Contents

Title Page I

About NTIS and EPA v

NTIS Products vl

How to Order vii

Sample Entry vlii

Administrative and Management

CERCLIS 1

Contracting and Contracts Integrity 3

Docket and Program Management 15

Planning and Program Management 15

Special Reports 23

Program Implementation

Assessment and Listing 57

Compliance with Other Laws 69

Community Relations, State and Local, Tag Grants 77

Enforcement 86

Federal Facilities 167

Field Health and Safety 168

Oil Spill and Spill Management 172

Public Information and Outreach 174

QA/QC Laboratory Program 182

Removal Program Management 186

Risk Management 189

RI/FS and RODS Process 202

RD/RA 209

RQ's and Continuous Release 213

Treatability Studies 215

103(c) 219

Technology Policy and Administration

Conference Proceedings 222

Electronic Tools 222

Miscellaneous Policy and Program Documents 222

iii

-------
Technology Program Implementation

Air Technologies 263

Bioremediation Technologies 274

Groundwater Technologies 276

Incineration and Thermal Technologies 286

Soil Cleanup Technologies 289

Solidification Technologies 302

Surface Water and Sludge Treatment Technologies 308

Indexes

Subject Index SU-1

Number Index NU-1

Price Schedules PC

Order forms OF

-------
ABOUT NTIS AND EPA

National Technical Information Service

The National Technical Information Service (NTIS) is a self-
supporting agency within the U.S. Department of Commerce
where scientific, technical, engineering and business-related
information generated by the U.S. government and foreign
sources is collected and made available for purchase by the
general public. As such, NTIS is a partner to the Environ-
mental Protection Agency for the distribution of its reports
which are publicly releasable.

The NTIS collection, which contains more than 2.2 million
reports and grows by nearly 1,500 titles each week, includes
information on current technologies, business and manage-
ment studies, and international market research. Additional
findings are available in the fields of energy, health and so-
cial sciences.

As a key participant in the development of advanced infor-
mation products and services, NTIS is able to provide its
reports in various formats in addition to paper copy and mi-
crofiche. Much of the collection can be supplied in electronic
formats including dataflles on tape, datafiles on diskette, soft-
ware programs on tape, software programs on diskette, titles
on CD-ROM, audiovisuals, slide sets and multimedia kits.

Although a federal agency within the Technology Adminis-
tration of the U.S. Department of Commerce, NTIS is unique

in that it does not receive tax-payer support from Congress.
Instead, operating costs must be recovered from the sale of
its products and services.

The EPA-NTIS Partnership

Superfund is the federal program that protects people and
the environment by cleaning up abandoned or uncontrolled
hazardous waste sites. It was established by Congress in
1980 in response to the growing concern over health and
environmental risks posed by these sites. Administered
nationwide by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) and its 10 regional offices, it works in cooperation
with individual states and tribal governments. Cleanup ac-
tivities are funded either by the parties responsible for con-
tamination, or by the Superfund Trust Fund, derived from a
tax on the chemical and petroleum industries.

Since the program's inception, EPA has studied thousands
of hazardous waste sites and gained extensive experience
in technologies associated with successful removal or re-
mediation. This experience is documented in scores of pro-
gram guidances and technical manuals, fact sheets, soft-
ware and explanatory documents. Production of these prod-
ucts has made the Office of Emergency and Remedial Re-
sponse (OERR), Superfund's home office in EPA, a larger
publishing enterprise than many private sector publishers.
Disseminating this information to program participants who
Include states, local and tribal governments, private con-
tracting firms, potentially responsible parties, law firms, and
citizens groups is a daunting task.

In 1991, The National Technical Information Service (NTIS)
joined in a partnership with EPA under which it serves as
the public clearinghouse for access to this collection, en-
suring that requests for these products are filled rapidly and
at the lowest possible cost. NTIS is the repository of techni-
cal publications for the federal government, and is the larg-
est single source for public access to federally produced
information. It is equipped to reproduce and distribute pub-
lications on demand, or on a standing order basis.

The partnership streamlines public access to Superfund
publications, and ensures timely, cost-effective production
of top-quality products. In keeping with the new emphasis
on streamlining government, the partnership has enabled
EPA to fully dedicate its resources to Superfund's mission
of hazardous site cleanup.

-------
NTIS PRODUCTS

NTIS ALERT

NTIS Alerts are available in two subscription formats; prepackaged and
customized.

Prepackaged subscriptions cover the latest developments and information
resources in board subject areas. NTIS prepares prepackaged subscriptions in
the subjects listed below. All are published twice a month. For a price list and
sample copies, please write to Subscriptions, NTIS, Springfield, VA 22161 or
call 703-487-4630.

• Agriculture & Food

• Astronomy & Astrophysics

• Biomedical Technology & Human
Factors Engineering

• Building Industry Technology

• Business & Economics

• Civil Engineering

• Combustion, Engines & Propellants

• Communication

• Computers, Control & Information
Theory

• Detection & Countermeasures

• Electrotechnology

• Energy

• Environmental Pollution & Control

¦ Government Inventions for
Licensing

• Health Care

¦ Library & Information Sciences

¦ Manufacturing Technology
«Materials Sciences

¦ Mathematical Sciences

¦ Navigation, Guidance & Control

¦ Ocean Technology & Engineering
1 Ordnance

' Photography & Recording Devices

« Regional & Urban Planning &
Technology

• Space Technology
¦Transportation

Custom Ized Alerts are also offered that focus on specific topes. You can choose
from nearly 200 different topics, ideal for staying current in a highly specialized
area of interest. Or, combine several topics to tailor a subscription to your exact
need for information. Twice a month, your customized set of topical search
criteria will be run against the newest NTIS studies and research reports. Sum-
maries of pertinent material will be assembled into one custom Alert, prepared
just for you. For complete information on Custom NTIS Alerts please write to
Subscriptions, NTIS, Springfield, VA22161 or call 703-487-4630 and request
PR-797.

SELECTED

DENSE AD/1!! IMI

MICROFICHE (SRIM)

SRIM is a tailored information service that automatically delivers microfiche cop-
ies of complete reports. You design your own subscription parameters, choos-
ing from more than 350 topics. You than receive all the actual documents in
microfiche at the same time they are being announced in other NTIS information
products. Subject indexes are also available for SRIM. These cumulative in-
dexes are unique to each customer and give ready reference to all of the micro-
fiche received within a calendar year. For complete information on NTIS SRIM,
please write to Subscriptions, NTIS, Springfield, VA 22161 or call 703-487-4630
and request PR-271.

A VARIETY OF
PRODUCT FORMATS

The NTIS collection is not limited to printed reports and documents.

Many printed reports and documents are also available on microfiche. NTIS
provides datafiles and software program products in electronic formats on tape
and floppy diskette, as well as some titles on CD-ROM.

-------
How to Order

How to order a document from NTIS:

1. Locate the NTIS order number and Price code for
a document

0001 CERCLIS Characterization Project: National Results

Order numbd£g§92-963331 CDbpPrice PC A06/MF
-------
Sample Entry

Title-

Reference number

NTIS order number

Summary •

Price code* *

Keywords -

^ ^<§001)CERCLi$ Characterization Project: National Results

^^Order number PB92-963331CDH, Price PQ^QB^MF A02

Environmental Protection Agency, Wgatltngton, D.C. Office of Emer-
gency and Remedial Respon^erflov 91

The report, which isjjiwrtna series providing information on the nature
_of the sites bgjogiwaluated by the Superfund site assessment pro-
gram^jbarScterizes a sample of national sites in CERCLIS. Separate
ts are available for the ten EPA regions.

Specification: Paper copy available on Standing Order, deposit
account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and Mexico;
all others $400). Single copies also available in paper copy or micro-
fiche. 108p.

-Subject index keyword; Hazardous materials, Sites, Assessments,
United States, Superfund, Comprehensive Environmental Response
Compensation and Liability Act (GERCLA), CERCLA Information
Systems (CERCLIS).

*AII documents are listed with a price code. Schedules to convert the
price codes into dollar amounts are provided at the back of the catalog.

viii

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT:

CERCLIS

0001 CERCLIS Characterization Project: National Results

Order Number PB92-963315CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
The report, which is one in a series providing information on
the nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site
assessment program, characterizes a sample of national
sites in CERCLIS. Separate reports are available for the ten
EPA Regions.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Sites, As-
sessments, United States, Superfund, Comprehensive Envi-
ronmental Response Compensation and Liability
Act(CERCLA), CERCLA Information System(CERCLIS).

0002 CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 1 Results

Order Number PB92-963316CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
The publication is one In a series of reports providing infor-
mation on the nature of the sites being evaluated by the Su-
perfund site assessment program and characterizes a
sample of Regional sites in CERCLIS. National and Regional
NPL (National Priority List) characterization reports cover the
NPL characterization project, which provides a snapshot of
sites on the NPL as of February 1991.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Sites, As-
sessments, Superfund, CERCLA(Comprehensive Environ-
mental Response Compensation and Liability Act),
CERCLIS(CERCLA Information System).

0003 CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 2 Results

Order Number PB92-963317CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
The publication is one in a series of reports providing infor-
mation on the nature of the sites being evaluated by the Su-
perfund site assessment program and characterizes a
sample of Regional sites in CERCLIS. National and Regional
NPL (National Priorities List) characterization reports cover
the NPL characterization project, which provides a snapshot
of sites on the NPL as of February 1991.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Sites, As-
sessments, Superfund, CERCLA{Comprehensive Environ-
mental Response Compensation and Liability Act),
CERCLIS(CERCLA Information System).

0004 CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 3 Results

Order Number PB92-963318CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
The report, which is one in a series providing information on
the nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site
assessment program, characterizes a sample of Region 3
sites in CERCLIS. Separate reports are available for the
other nine EPA Regions and for the nation as a whole.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Singie copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 88p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Sites, As-
sessments, Superfund, Comprehensive Environmental Re-
sponse Compensation and Liability Act(CERCLA), CERCLA
Information System(CERCLIS).

0005 CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 4 Results

Order Number PB92-963319CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
The report, which is one in a series providing information on
the nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site
assessment program, characterizes a sample of Region 4
sites in CERCLIS. Separate reports are available for the
other nine EPA regions and for the nation as a whole.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 80p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Sites, As-
sessments, Superfund, Comprehensive Environmental Re-
sponse Compensation and Liability Act(CERCLA), CERCLA
Information System(CERCLIS).

0006 CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 5 Results

Order Number PB92-963320CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
The report, which is one in a series providing information on
the nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site
assessment program, characterizes a sample of Region 5
sites in CERCLIS. Separate reports are available for the
other nine EPA Regions and for the nation as a whole.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 80p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Sites, As-
sessments, Superfund, US EPA Region 5, Comprehensive
Environmental Response Compensation and Liability
Act(CERCLA), CERCLA Information System(CERCLIS).

0007 CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 6 Results

Order Number PB92-963321CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
The report, which is one in a series providing information on
the nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site
assessment program, characterizes a sample of Region 6

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: CERCLIS

sites in CERCLIS, Separate reports are available for the
other nine EPA Regions and tor the nation as a whole.
Specifications; Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 80p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Sites, As-
sessments, Superfund, US EPA Region 6, Comprehensive
Environmental Response Compensation and Liability
Act(CERCLA), CERCLA Information System(CERCLIS).

0008 CERCLIS Characterization Project Region 7 Results

Order Number PB92-963322CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
The report, which is one in a series providing information on
the nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site
assessment program, characterizes a sample of Region 7
sites in CERCLIS. Separate reports are available for the
other nine EPA Regions and for the nation as a whole.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 80p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Sites, As-
sessments, Superfund, US EPA Region 7, Comprehensive
Environmental Response Compensation and Liability
Act(CERCLA), CERCLA Information System(CERCLIS).

0009 CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 8 Results

Order Number PB92-963323CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
The report, which is one in a series providing information on
the nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site
assessment program, characterizes a sample of Region 8
sites in CERCLIS. Separate reports are available for the
other nine EPA Regions and for the nation as a whole.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 80p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Sites, As-
sessments, Superfund, Comprehensive Environmental Re-
sponse Compensation and Liability Act(CERCLA), CERCLA
Information System(CERCLlS).

0010 CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 9 Results

Order Number PB92-963324CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
The report, which is one in a series providing information on
the nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site
assessment program, characterizes a sample of Region 9
sites in CERCLIS. Separater reports are available for the
other nine EPA Regions and for the nation as a whole.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 80p.

Subject index keywords; Hazardous materials, Sites, As-
sessments, Superfund, Comprehensive Environmental Re-

sponse Compensation and Liability Act(CERCLA), CERCLA
Information System(CERCLIS).

0011 CERCLIS Characterization Project; Region 10
Results

Order Number PB92-963325CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
The report Is one in a series providing information on the
nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site as-
sessment program and characterizing a sample of sites in
CERCLIS. Separate reports are available for the other nine
EPA Regions and for the nation as a whole.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Sites, As-
sessments, Superfund, Comprehensive Environmental Re-
sponse Compensation and Liability Act(CERCLA), CERCLA
Information System(CERCLIS).

0012 CERCLIS (Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Information System} Site
Location Extract

Order Number PB90-591310CDH, price: Subscription, call for
price

Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 1990
The file contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites
that have been reported to the Environmental Protection
Agency by States, Municipalities, Private companies and pri-
vate persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act
(CERCLA) of 1980, as amended. The file contains informa-
tion on the name and alias names, location, and indicators
for National Priority status and Federal Facility.
Specifications: Source tape is in the EBCDIC character set.
This restricts preparation to 9 track, one-half inch tape only.
Identify recording mode by specifying density only. For price
at 6250 bpi density, call NTIS Computer Products. Price in-
clude documentation, PB90-215120. Available on subscrip-
tion, NAC price $880/yr; individual issue $220; all others
write for quote. Issued quarterly. Supersedes PB88-914800.
See also PB90-591300.

Subject index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Sites.

0013 CERCLIS Data Handling Support Policy Statement

Order Number PB90-258328CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 30 May 90
The directive updates the policy statement published on
March 31, 1986, regarding management of the data handling
support contract for CERCLIS. The update contains no major
changes in policy, but rather presents the information in ac-
cordance with the current document management standards.
Specifications: 5p.

Subject index keywords: Regulations, Project management,
Documentation, Contract administration, Superfund, Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Contracting &

Contracts Integrity

0014 CERCLIS Listing

Order Number PB91-921348CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 5 Feb 90
The directive discusses ways to assure rapid entry into the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Information System (CERCLIS) of locations identified
to or by the Agency as potential hazardous waste release
sites. The directive re-emphasizes the use of the Preliminary
Assessment Petition and provides a copy of the public edu-
cational bulletin, 'Preliminary Assessment Petition,'
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 7p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Preliminary Assessment Petition.

0015 CERCLIS - WasteLAN - CleanLAN

Order Number PB91-9Z1316CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 91
CERCLIS, WasteLAN and CleanLAN information manage-
ment systems are an integral component of the Superfund
program site planning and management structure and
progress reporting. These three integrated systems provide
information for Superfund regional program and project man-
agement as well as reporting activities to EPA management,
Congress, USACE and the public.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 3p.

Subject index keywords: Program management, Informa-
tion systems, Hazardous materials, Superfund, Comprehen-
sive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act
of 1980.

ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT:
Contracting & Contracts Integrity

0016 Abstracts of Phase 1 and Phase 2 Awards: Small
Business Innovation Research Program 1991

Order Number PB94-146495CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Research and Development; Feb 92
Contents; 1991 Phase I abstracts (Drinking water treatment;
Municipal and industrial waste water treatment and pollution
control; Biological sludge treatment for improved handling
and disposal; Solid and hazardous waste disposal; In situ
treatment technologies for hazardous and toxic waste at Su-
perfund sites; Innovative restoration technologies removing
heavy metals at Superfund sites; Control of acid rain precur-
sors; Air pollution control; Waste reduction and pollution pre-
vention; and, Oil spill prevention cleanup, and restoration
technology) and 1991 Phase II abstracts (Municipal and in-
dustrial waste water treatment and pollution control; Solid
and hazardous waste disposal; Control of acid rain precur-
sors; Air pollution control; Waste reduction and pollution pre-
vention: and, Oil spill prevention, cleanup, and restoration
technology).

Specifications: 31 p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Research projects,
SBIR(Small Business Innovative Research).

0017 Administrative Guidance for the FIT to ARCS (FIT/
ARCS) Transition

Order Number PB92-963332CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 29 Nov 91
The report describes the final administrative guidance for
managing pre-remedial, site assessment work under the Al-
ternative Remedial Contracting Strategy (ARCS) contracts.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 113p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Project management, Superfund.

0018 Approval of Long Term Contracting Strategy for
Superfund (Superfund Management Review:
Recommendation E.2)

Order Number PB90-273822CDH, price; PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 31 Aug 90
The directive summarizes the issues, findings, analysis and
recommendations for the Superfund Long-Term Contracting
Strategy which was developed to analyze the long-term con-
tract needs of the Superfund Program and to design a port-
folio of Superfund contracts to meet those needs over the
next ten years.

Specifications: 42p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Project
management, Contracts, Superfund, Management reviews,
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0019 ARCS (Alternative Remedial Contract Strategy)
Contracts Users' Manual

Order Number PB90-108549CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 89
The handbook provides guidance for EPA Regional person-
nel with responsibility for management and administration of
Alternative Remedial Contract Strategy (ARCS) contracts.
The ARCS is EPA's approach to obtaining project manage-
ment and technical services to support remedial response
activities at National Priorities List sites. Guidance is provided
on contractor start-up, operational functions and a manage-
ment plan for multi-regional ARCS contracts.

Specifications: 90p.

Subject index keywords: Regional planning, Contract ad-
ministration, Hazardous materials, Waste disposal, Alterna-
tive Remedial Contract Strategy, Remedial response, Super-
fund program.

0020 ARCS Construction Contract Modification
Procedures

Order Number PB90-274515CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 89
The fact sheet describes the contracting relationships, tech-
nical reviews, and administrative procedures required to

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Contracting &
Contracts Integrity

process supplemental agreements and change orders for
changed work in Remedial Action construction projects
which are subcontracts under EPA's ARCS contracts.
Specifications: 9p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Construction
management, Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, Remedial action.

0021 ARCS Work Assignment Management: Field Guide

Order Number PB91-214965CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 89
The ARCS Work Assignment management Field Guide is
one of the three management-assistance tools currently
available to help RPMs in carrying out their ARCS work as-
signment management duties. The guide is designed specifi-
cally for RPMs to provide them with quick reference informa-
tion on the initiation and management of ARCS work assign-
ments.

Specifications: 131 p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Alternative Remedial Contract Strategy.

0022 Congressional Limits for FY 92 Alternative Remedial
Contracting Strategy (ARCS) Program Management
Costs

Order Number PB92-963260CDH, price; PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 16 Mar 92
The directive transmits Congressionally mandated targets
and reporting requirements for ARCS contracts Program
Management costs.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0023 Contracting and Subcontracting Guide to the
Superfund Program

Order Number PB92-963274CDH, price: PC Free
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 92
The document assists those interested in providing contrac-
tual services to the Superfund program, describes current
Superfund contracts and provides contact points, addresses,
and telephone numbers of firms with Superfund contracts.
Specifications: Supersedes PB89-233431. 74p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Contract ad-
ministration, Subcontracts, Pollution control, Superfund,

0024 Emergency Response Cleanup Services Contracts
(ERCS). Users Manual

Order Number PB90-191966CDH, price: PC A10/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 87
The report provides information to assist EPA Headquarters
and Regional personnel, and personnel from other Federal
agencies (e.g., U.S. Coast Guard) authorized to use the
ERCS contracts efficiently and effectively. In addition, the
users' manual discusses coordinating the use of the ERCS

contracts with other entities involved with the Superfund pro-
gram.

Specifications: 21 Op.

Subject index keywords: Emergencies, Hazardous materi-
als, Contract administration, Cleanup.

0025 Guidance for Organizing ARCS Contract Files

Order Number PB91-215020CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 3 Jan 89
The directive provides instructions to the Regions for devel-
opment of a consistent, yet flexible filing system for organiz-
ing and managing ARCS Contract files.

Specifications: 10p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0026 Guidance on Program Management Activities under
ARCS

Order Number PB93-963280CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 11 Feb 93
The directive provides guidance on the division of program
management costs into administrative support costs and
technical cleanup costs and the development of guidance on
cost management activities.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0027 Guidelines for Effective Management of the
Contract Laboratory Program

Order Number PB90-272568CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 89
The fact sheet provides guidance to Superfund Headquarters
Project Officers (POs) and Regional deputy Project Officers
(DPOs). The PO and DPO roles, responsibilities, limitations,
and interrelationships with other supporting parties are de-
fined for every stage of the Superfund process.
Specifications: See also PB90-191545. 4p.

Subject index keywords: Project management, Superfund,
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Contract
Laboratory Program.

0028 Guidelines for Effective Management of the
Contract Laboratory Program. Part 1. Contract Award.
Part 2. Contract Administration

Order Number PB90-191545CDH, price: PC A15/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 89
Provides internal guidelines for Superfund Project Officers in
procuring, administering, managing CLP contracts.
Specifications: 346p,

Subject index keywords: Laboratories, Superfund program,
Contract Laboratory Program.

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Contracting &

Contracts Integrity

0029 Headquarters Support Contract Management
Procedures

Order Number PB91-921335CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 15 Nov 89
The directive addresses two areas: (1) perceptions that may
weaken public confidence in the Superfund program and its
use of these contracts; and (2) procedures designed to
strengthen controls and effectiveness in the management of
the contracts. It is not ail inclusive but provides information
to be applied to OERR work assignments.

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0030 Implementation ot the Alternative Remedial
Contracting Strategy (ARCS) Task Force
Recommendations: Transmittal of the Implementation
Plan

Order Number PB92-963258CDH, price; PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 22 Jan 92
The memorandum transmits the Implementation Plan for the
recommendations embodied in the Alternative Remedial
Contracting Strategy (ARCS) Task Force Report.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 5p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Contract administration, Superfund.

0031 implementation of the Decentralized Contractor
Performance Evaluation and Award Fee Process for
Selected Remedial Program Contracts

Order Number PB91-205492CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 9 Mar 87
The directive is intended to: (1) further develop Regional in-
frastructures for managing contracts in advance of imple-
mentation of the Alternative Remedial Contracts Strategy
(ARCS); (2) effect the Agency's policy of decentralizing Su-
perfund activities to the Regions, consistent with other pro-
gram delegations; (3) focus accountability for contractor per-
formance monitoring on the individuals who are responsible
for site specific Program operations; (4) allow those most fa-
miliar with a contractor's performance and determine the
amount of fee to be awarded; and (5) increase communica-
tion between Agency and contractor personnel at all oper-
ational and management levels. The Standard Operating Pro-
cedure (SOP) defines the roles and responsibilities of key
Regional, Headquarters, and Contractor personnel and de-
fines the basic structure and operation of the award fee
process, as well as establishes minimum requirements for
contractor performance evaluations and award fee decisions.
Specifications: 14p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Remedial action, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response.

0032 implementation of the Superfund Alternative
Remedial Contracting Strategy (ARCS): Report of the
Administrator's Task Force. Implementation Plan

Order Number PB92-963201CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 27 Nov 91
The report includes results of a Task Force analysis of the
criticism the EPA received about the management of the Su-
perfund contracting program. EPA was accused of allowing
Superfund contractors to spend an inordinate amount of
public funds on activities other than the direct clean-up of
contaminated sites. The document provides a summary of
recommendations, strategies and proposed milestones to im-
plement.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Project
management, Pollution control, Superfund.

0033 Initiatives to Streamline the Alternative Remedial
Contracting Strategy (ARCS) Contracts' Award Fee
Process

Order Number PB93-963275CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 4 Sep 92
The directive delineates changes to the Alternative Remedial
Contracting Strategy (ARCS) award fee process which will
streamline the system for evaluating contractors' perform-
ance.

Subject index keywords; Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Alternative Remedial Contracting Strategy.

0034 inorganic Contract Compliance Screening System
(ICCSS) Software (for Microcomputers)

Order Number PB90-591700CDH, price: Standing Order, call
for price

Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 12 Feb 90
Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening System (ICCSS)
software is a version of a mainframe-based application de-
veloped for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Na-
tional Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). ICCSS is designed
to automate the determination of contracture! compliance
and completeness of data submitted to the EPA under the
Routine Analytical Services (RAS) programs of CERCLA
(Comprehensive Emergency Response Clean-up and Liability
Act) and SARA (Superfund Amendments and Reauthoriza-
tion Act). In order to remain consistent with the mainframe
system, the PC version of ICCSS is written in SAS and re-
quires that SAS/PC be installed on the host PC. It will load
analytical data from diskettes into SAS file format, perform
technical edits on data, produce technical defect and sum-
mary reports, and reproduce forms which contain defects. In
addition, ICCSS includes software to assist in identifying
these critical structural defects in the data format, to assist in
identifying these for correction prior to performing technical

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT; Contracting &
Contracts Integrity

edits. The 3/90 version of IGCSS software is applicable to
structural and technical checking of diskette data in either
format A or B for inorganic analysis under the CLP RAS 2/88
Statement of Work (SOW)...Software Description: The pro-
gram is written in the SAS programming language for imple-
mentation on an IBM/AT,PS/2 or compatible microcomputer
using MS DOS 3.3 operating system.

Specifications: The software is contained on 5 1 /4-inch dis-
kettes, high density (1.2M), compatible with the IBM PC
microcomputer. The diskettes are in the ASCII format. Price
includes documentation, PB90-213836. Available on Stand-
ing Order, Deposit Account required. North American Conti-
nent price $200.00; all others write for quote. 1 diskette.
Subject index keywords: Software, Contract administration,
Monitoring, Comprehensive Emergency Response Clean-up
and Liability Act(CERCLA), Superfund Amendments and Re-
authorization Act(SARA).

0035 Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening System
(ICCSS) Software for the PC (Version 3/90) User Manual

Order Number PB90-213836CDH, price; PC A07/MF A01
Viar and Co., Alexandria, VA, Management Services Div.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 90
The document is the user manual for Inorganic Contract
Compliance Screening System (ICCSS) software. ICCSS
software is a version of a mainframe-based application de-
veloped for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Na-
tional Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). ICCSS is designed
to automate the determination of contractual compliance and
completeness of data submitted to EPA under the Routine
Analytical Services (RAS) programs of CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Emergency Response Clean-up and Liability Act)
and SARA (Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization
Act), in order to remain consistent with the mainframe
system the PC version of ICCSS is written in SAS and re-
quires that SAS/PC be installed on the host PC. It will load
analytical data from diskettes "into SAS file format, perform
technical edits on the data, produce technical defect and
summary reports, and reproduce forms which shows defects.
In addition, ICCSS includes software to detect critical struc-
tural defects in the data format, to assist in identifying these
for correction prior to performing technical edits. The 2/90
version of ICCSS software is applicable to structural and
technical checking of diskette data in either format A or B for
inorganic analysis under the CLP RAS 2/88 Statement of
Work (SOW).

Specifications: For system on diskette, see PB90-591700.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. 138p.
Subject index keywords: Contract administration, Monitor-
ing, Comprehensive Emergency Response Clean-up and Li-
ability Act(CERCLA), Superfund Amendments and Reauthor-
ization Act(SARA).

0036 Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening System
(ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version 2) (for
Microcomputers)

Order Number PB93-500288CDH, price: D02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Hazardous Site Evaluation Div; 1992
ICCSS software is a version of a mainframe-based applica-
tion developed for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agen-
cy's National Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). OCCSS is

designed to automate the determination of contractural com-
pliance and completeness of data submitted to the EPA
under the Routine Analytical Services (RAS) programs of
CERCLA (Comprehensive Environmental Response Compen-
sation and Liability Act). In order to remain consistent with
the mainframe system, the PC version of ICCSS is written in
SAS, and requires that SAS/PC be installed on the host PC.
It will load analytical data from diskettes into SAS file format,
perform technical edits on data, produce technical defect
and summary reports, and reproduce forms which contain
defects. In addition, OCCSS includes software to assist in
identifying these critical structural defects in the data format,
to assist in identifying these for correction prior to performing
technical edits.

Specifications: The software is on one 5 1/4 inch diskette,
1.2M high density. File format: Executable Code. Documenta-
tion included; may be ordered separately as PB92-145598,
System: IBM AT/PS2, or compatible; MS DOS Version 3.3
operating system. Language: Base SAS. Supersedes PB92-
501519. Other formats available as PB93-500270 (OCCSS).
1 diskette.

Subject index keywords: Software, Waste management,
Analytical chemistry, Environmental surveys, Inorganic com-
pounds, Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening System.

0037 Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening System
(ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version 3) (for
Microcomputers)

Order Number PB93-505352CDH, price: D02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Hazardous Site Evaluation Div; Apr 93
ICCSS software is a version of a mainframe-based applica-
tion developed for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agen-
cy's National Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). ICCSS is
designed to automate the determination of contractural com-
pliance and completeness of data submitted to the EPA
under the Routine Analytical Services (RAS) programs of
CERCLA (Comprehensive Emergency Response Clean-up
and Liability Act). In order to remain consistent with the
mainframe system, the PC version of ICCSS is written in
SAS, and requires that SAS/PC be installed on the host PC.
It will load analytical data from diskettes into SAS file format,
perform technical edits on data, produce technical defect
and summary reports, and reproduce forms which contain
defects. In addition, ICCSS includes software to assist in
identifying these critical structural defects in the data format,
to assist in identifying these for correction prior to performing
technical edits.

Specifications: The software is on one 5 1/4 inch diskette,
360K double density. File Format: Executable Code. Docu-
mentation included; may be ordered separately as PB92-
145598. System: IBM compatible; MS DOS operating
system. Language: Base SAS. Supersedes PB93-500288.
See also PB92-501519 and PB90-591700.1 diskette.

Subject index keywords: Software, Waste management, In-
organic compounds, Analytical chemistry, Environmental sur-
veys, Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening System.

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Contracting &

Contracts Integrity

0038 Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening System
(ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version 4) (for
Microcomputers)

Order Number PB94-500642CDH, price: DQ2
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Hazardous Site Evaluation Div; 1994
ICCSS software is a version of a mainframe-based applica-
tion developed for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agen-
cy's National Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). ICCSS is
designed to automate the determination of contractural com-
pliance and completeness of data submitted to the EPA
under the Routine Analytical Services (RAS) programs of
CERCLA (Comprehensive Emergency Response Clean-up
and Liability Act). In order to remain consistent with the
mainframe system, the PC version of ICCSS is written in
SAS, and requires that SAS/PC be installed on the host PC.
It will load analytical data from diskettes into SAS file format,
perform technical edits on data, produce technical defect
and summary reports, and reproduce forms which contain
defects. In addition, ICCSS includes software to assist in
identifying these critical structural defects in the data format,
to assist in identifying these for correction prior to performing
technical edits.

Specifications: The software is on one 5 1/4 inch diskette,
360K double density. File format: Executable code. Docu-
mentation included; may be ordered separately as PB92-
145598. System: IBM compatible; MS DOS operating
system, 585K. Language: Base SAS. 2MB. Hard disk with at
least 10 MB of available space. Printer with wide carriage or
ability to compress print. Other software which are memory
resident will use up base memory and should not be on the
same machine as ICCSS. SAS required, not available NTIS.
Supersedes PB93-505352. See al. 1 diskette.

Subject index keywords: Software, Superfund, Contract
management.

0039 Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening System
(ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version 5) (for
Microcomputers)

Order Number PB94-501467CDH, price; DQ2
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 1994
ICCSS software is a version of a mainframe-based applica-
tion developed for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agen-
cy's National Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). ICCSS is
designed to automate the determination of contractural com-
pliance and completeness of data submitted to the EPA
under the Routine Analytical Services (RAS) programs of
CERCLA (Comprehensive Emergency Response Clean-up
and Liability Act). In order to remain consistent with the
mainframe system, this PC version of ICCSS is written in
SAS, and requires that SAS/PC be installed on the host PC.
It will load analytical data from diskettes into SAS file format,
perform technical edits on data, produce technical defect
and summary reports, and reproduce forms which contain
defects. In addition, ICCSS includes software to assist in
identifying these critical structural defects in the data format,
to assist in identifying these for correction prior to performing
technical edits.

585K. Language: Base SAS. 2 mb of RAM with memory over
640 K configured as expanded memory. Hard disk with at
least 10 mb of available space. Printer with wide carriage or
ability to compress print. Other software which are memory
resident will use up base memory and should not be on the
same machine as SAS required, not available NTIS. 1 dis-
kette.

Subject index keywords: Software, Inorganic compounds,
Superfund, Contract management.

0040 Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening System
(ICCSS) Software (SOW March 1990) (Version 1) (for
Microcomputers)

Order Number PB92-501519CDH, price: D02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 90
ICCSS software is a version of a mainframe-based applica-
tion developed for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agen-
cy's National Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). ICCSS is
designed to automate the determination of contractural com-
pliance and completeness of data submitted to the EPA
under the Routine Analytical Services (RAS) programs of
CERCLA (Comprehensive Environmental Response Compen-
sation and Liability Act). In order to remain consistent with
the mainframe system, this PC version of ICCSS is written in
SAS, and requires that SAS/PC be installed on the host PC.
It will load analytical data from diskettes into SAS file format,
perform technical edits on data, produce technical defect
and summary reports, and reproduce forms which contain
defects. In addition, ICCSS includes software to assist in
identifying these critical structural defects in the data format,
to assist in identifying these for correction prior to performing
technical edits.

Specifications: The software is on one (1) 5 1/4 inch dis-
kette, 1.2M high density File format: ASCII. Documentation
included; may be ordered separately as PB92-145598.
System: IBM AT/PS2, or compatible; MS DOS Version 3.3
operating system. Language: Base SAS. Supersedes PB90-
591700. 1 diskette.

Subject index keywords: Software, Analytical chemistry,
Environmental surveys, Inorganic compounds, Waste man-
agement, Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening System.

0041 Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening System
Software for the PC (SOW March 1990 Version 1). User
Manual

Order Number PB92-145598CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
Viar and Co., Alexandria, VA. Environmental Services Div.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 90
The Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening System
(ICCSS) software is a version of a mainframe-based applica-
tion developed for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agen-
cy's National Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). ICCSS is
designed to automate the determination of contractual com-
pliance and completeness of data submitted to EPA under
the Routine Analytical Services (RAS) programs of CERCLA
{Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation
and Liability Act) and SARA (Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act). The manual provides the user with in-
structions for running ICCSS software on the PC. Descrip-
tions of and instructions for each menu are detailed in the
following sections. The user should have a working knowl-

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Contracting &
Contracts Integrity

edge of PC DOS prior to utilizing this system. The following
sections present the ICCSS operating environment, describe
system output (reports), provide instructions for running the
system and generating reports, and specify input data re-
quirements. Examples of reports are contained in Appendix
A. Appendix B contains descriptions of report defect codes
and text. Appendix C is a listing of defect statements by cri-
terion with associated SOW references. Data Format A from
the Inorganic RAS SOW (3/90) is included as Appendix D.
Since ICCSS PC software is implemented using Base SAS
Software, the 'SAS Language Guide for Personal Computers'
from The SAS Institute, Inc. in Gary, North Carolina may be
helpful.

Specifications: For system on diskette see, PB92-501519.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. 143p.
Subject index keywords: Analytical chemistry, Environmen-
tal surveys, Inorganic compounds, User manuals(Computer
programs), Waste management, Inorganic Contract Compli-
ance Screening System.

0042 Long-Term Contracting Strategy for Superfund

Order Number PB90-274275CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
The fact sheet provides a summary of the Superfund Long-
Term Contracting Strategy which was developed to analyze
the long-term contract needs of the Superfund program.
Specifications: 6p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Project
management, Contracts, Superfund, Waste management,
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

0043 Long-Term Contracting Strategy for Superfund -
Implementation

Order Number PB91-921358CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 91
The memorandum clarifies the roles of the Advisory Commit-
tee and the Regions in implementing the Long-Term Con-
tracting Strategy for Superfund.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment, Superfund.

0044 Mentor-Protege Program

Order Number PB93-963251CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 92
The document presents the conceptual framework and un-
derstanding of the Mentor-Protege Program being introduced
and developed within the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) to stimulate the participation of small disadvantaged
businesses in EPA contract requirements.

Subject index keywords: Contract administration, Small
businesses, Environmental Protection Agency.

0045 Model Performance Standards for Superfund
Project Officers, Deputy Project Officers, and Work
Assignment Managers/Delivery Order Officers

Order Number PB90-258336CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 26 Sep 88
The directive provides model performance standards and
suggested weightings to be used by Regions in developing
individual performance requirements for personnel serving in
Superfund contract management positions.

Specifications: 19p.

Subject index keywords: Regulations, Project management,
Performance standards, Contract administration, Superfund,
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

0046 OERR Organizational Conflict of Interest Review
and Approval Program (Superfund Management Review:
Recommendation No. 46C)

Order Number PB91-214957CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 31 Oct 89
The directive transmits new procedures to eliminate organi-
zational conflicts of interest in work assignments under Su-
perfund Headquarters support contracts and to take appro-
priate steps to mitigate the perception of conflict wherever
possible.

Specifications: 12p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0047 Organic Contract Compliance Screening System
(OCCSS) Software (for Microcomputers)

Order Number PB90-591690CDH, price: Standing Order, call
for price

Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 12 Feb 90
Organic Contract Compliance Screening System (OCCSS)
software is a version of a mainframe-based application de-
veloped for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Na-
tional Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). OCCSS is de-
signed to automate the determination of contractual compli-
ance and completeness of data submitted to the EPA under
the Routine Analytical Services (RAS) programs of CERCLA
(Comprehensive Emergency Response Clean-up and Liability
Act) and SARA (Superfund Amendments and Reauthoriza-
tion Act). In order to remain consistent with the mainframe
system, the PC version of OCCSS is written in SAS and re-
quires that SAS/PC be installed on the host PC. It will load
analytical data from diskettes into SAS file format, perform
technical edits on data, produce technical defect and sum-
mary reports, and reproduce forms which contain defects. In
addition, OCCSS includes software to assist in identifying
these critical structural defects in the data format, to assist in
identifying these for correction prior to performing technical
edits. The 2/90 version of OCCSS software is applicable to
structural and technical checking of diskette data in either
format A or B for organic analysis under the CLP RAS 2/88
Statement of Work (SOW)...Software Description: The pro-
gram is written in the SAS programming language for imple-
mentation on an IBM/AT,PS/2 or compatible microcomputer
using MS DOS 3,3 operating system.

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Contracting &

Contracts Integrity

Specifications: The software is contained on 5 1 /4-inch dis-
kettes, high density (1.2M), compatible with the IBM PC
microcomputer. The diskettes are in the ASGII format. Price
includes documentation, PB90-213844. Available on Stand-
ing Order, Deposit Account required. North American Conti-
nent price $200.00; all others write for quote. Supersedes
PB89-944900, 1 diskette.

Subject index keywords: Software, Contract administration,
Monitoring, Comprehensive Emergency Response Clean-up
and Liability Act(CERGLA), Superfund Amendments and Re-
authorization Act(SARA).

0048 Organic Contract Compliance Screening System
(OCCSS) Software for the PC (Version 2/90) User Manual

Order Number PB90-213844CDH, price: PC A08/MF A01
Viar and Co., Alexandria, VA. Management Services Div.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 90
The document is the user manual for Organic Contract Com-
pliance Screening System (OCCSS) software. OCCSS soft-
ware is a version of a mainframe-based application devel-
oped for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Nation-
al Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). OCCSS is designed
to automate the determination of contractual compliance and
completeness of data submitted to EPA under the Routine
Analytical Services (RAS) programs of CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Emergency Response Clean-up and Liability Act)
and SARA (Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization
Act). In order to remain consistent with the mainframe
system the PC version of OCCSS is written in SAS and re-
quires that SAS/PC be installed on the host PC. It will load
analytical data from diskettes into SAS file format, perform
technical edits on the data, produce technical defect and
summary reports, and reproduce forms which show defects.
In addition, OCCSS includes software to detect critical struc-
tural defects in the data format, to assist in identifying these
for correction prior to performing technical edits. The 2/90
version of OCCSS software is applicable to structural and
technical checking of diskette data in either format A or B for
Organic analysis under the CLP RAS 2/88 Statement of
Work (SOW).

Specifications: Supersedes PB89-167951. For system on
diskette, see PB90-591690. Sponsored by Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency
and Remedial Response. 167p.

Subject index keywords: Contract administration. Monitor-
ing, Comprehensive Emergency Response Clean-up and Li-
ability Aet(CERCLA), Superfund Amendments and Reauthor-
ization Act(SARA).

0049 Organic Contract Compliance Screening System
(OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Version 2) (for
Microcomputers)

Order Number PB92-502202CDH, price: D02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 1992
OCCSS software is a version of a mainframe-based applica-
tion developed for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agen-
cy's National Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). OCCSS is
designed to automate the determination of contractual com-
pliance and completeness of data submitted to the EPA
under the Routine Analytical Services (RAS) programs of
CERCLA (Comprehensive Emergency Response Compensa-
tion and Liability Act). In order to remain consistent with the

mainframe system, this PC version of OCCSS is written in
SAS, and requires that SAS/PC be installed on the host PC.
It will load analytical data from diskettes into SAS file format,
perform technical edits on date, produce technical defect
and summary reports, and reproduce forms which contain
defects. In addition, OCCSS includes software to assist in
identifying these critical structural defects in the data format,
to assist in identifying these for correction prior to performing
technical edits.

Specifications: The software is on one (1) 5 1/4 inch dis-
kette, 1,2M high density. File format ASCII. Documentation
included; may be ordered separately as PB92-169564.
System: IBM AT/PS2 or compatible; MS DOS Version 3.3
operating system. Language; Base SAS. Supercedes PB92-
501535. Other formats available as PB92-501519 (ICCSS). 1
diskette.

Subject index keywords: Software, Pollution regulations,
Organic compounds, Waste management, Organic Contract
Compliance Screening System.

0050 Organic Contract Compliance Screening System
(OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Version 3) {for
Microcomputers)

Order Number PB93-500270CDH, price: D02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Hazardous Site Evaluation Div; 1992
OCCSS software is a version of a mainframe-based applica-
tion developed for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agen-
cy's National Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). OCCSS is
designed to automate the determination of contractural com-
pliance and completeness of data submitted to the EPA
under the Routine Analytical Services (RAS) programs of
CERCLA (Comprehensive Environmental Response Compen-
sation and Liability Act). In order to remain consistent with
the mainframe system, the PC version of OCCSS is written in
SAS, and requires that SAS/PC be installed on the host PC.
It will load analytical data from diskettes into SAS file format,
perform technical edits on data, produce technical defect
and summary reports, and reproduce forms which contain
defects. In addition, OCCSS includes software to assist in
identifying these critical structural defects in the data format,
to assist in identifying these for correction prior to performing
technical edits.

Specifications: The software is on one 5 1/4 inch diskette,
1.2M high density. File format: Executable Code. Documenta-
tion included; may be ordered separately as PB92-169564.
System: IBM AT/PS2 or compatible; MS DOS Version 3.3
operating system. Language: Base SAS. Supersedes PB92-
502202. See also PB92-501501 (SOW 2/88/Vers. 6/90),
and PB92-501527 (SOW 3/90). Other formats available as
PB93-500288 (ICCSS). 1 diskette.

Subject index keywords: Software, Environmental surveys,
Organic compounds, Waste management, Analytical chemis-
try, Organic Contract Compliance Screening System.

0051 Organic Contract Compliance Screening System
(OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Version 4) (for
Microcomputers)

Order Number PB93-505345CDH, price; D02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Hazardous Site Evaluation Div; Apr 93
OCCSS software is a version of a mainframe-based applica-
tion developed for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agen-

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Contracting &
Contracts Integrity

cy's National Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). OCCSS is
designed to automate the determination of contractual com-
pliance and completeness of data submitted to the EPA
under the Routine Analytical Services (RAS) programs of
CERCLA (Comprehensive Emergency Response Clean-up
and Liability Act). In order to remain consistent with the
mainframe system, the PC version of OCCSS is written in
SAS, and requires that SAS/PC be installed on the host PC.
It will load analytical data from diskettes into SAS file format,
perform technical edits on data, produce technical defect
and summary reports, and reproduce forms which contain
defects. In addition, OCCSS includes software to assist in
identifying these critical structural defects in the data format,
to assist in identifying these for correction prior to performing
technical edits.

Specifications; The software is on one 5 1 /4 inch diskette,
1.2M high density. File format: Executable Code. Documenta-
tion included; may be ordered separately as PB92-169564.
System: IBM AT / PS2 or compatible; MS DOS Version 3.3
operating system. Language: Base SAS. Supersedes PB93-
500270. See also PB92-501535 and PB92-502202. 1 dis-
kette.

Subject index keywords: Software, Superfund, Solid waste
management, OCCSSfOrganic Contract Compliance Screen-
ing System).

0052 Organic Contract Compliance Screening System
(OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Version 5) (for
Microcomputers)

Order Number PB93-506053CDH, price: D02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Hazardous Site Evaluation Div; Jul 93
OCCSS software is a version of a mainframe-based applica-
tion developed for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agen-
cy's National Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). OCCSS is
designed to automate the determination of contractural com-
pliance and completeness of data submitted to the EPA
under the Routine Analytical Services (RAS) programs of
CERCLA (Comprehensive Emergency Response Clean-up
and Liability Act). In order to remain consistent with the
mainframe system, the PC version of OCCSS is written in
SAS, and requires that SAS/PC be installed on the host PC.
It will load analytical data from diskettes into SAS file format,
perform technical edits on data, produce technical defect
and summary reports, and reproduce forms which contain
defects. In addition, OCCSS includes software to assist in
identifying these critical structural defects in the data format,
to assist in identifying these for correction prior to performing
technical edits.

Specifications: The software is one 5 1/4 inch diskette,
1,2M high density. File format: Executable code. Documenta-
tion included; may be ordered separately as PB92-169564.
System: IBM AT/PS2 or compatible; MS DOS Version 3.3
operating system. Language: Base SAS. Supersedes PB93-
505345. 2 megabytes of RAM with memory over 640K con-
figured as expanded memory. Hard disk with at least 10 me-
gabytes of available space. Printer with wide carriage or abili-
ty to compress print. This application requires a minimum of
585K of base memory. 1 diskette.

Subject index keywords: Software, Pollution standards, Or-
ganic compounds, Superfund.

0053 Organic Contract Compliance Screening System
(OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Version 6) (for
Microcomputers)

Order Number PB94-501335CDH, price: D02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 94
OCCSS software is a version of a mainframe-based applica-
tion developed for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agen-
cy's National Contract Laboratory Program (CLP), OCCSS is
designed to automate the determination of contractural com-
pliance and completeness of data submitted to the EPA
under the Routine Analytical Services (RAS) programs of
CERCLA (Comprehensive Environmental Response Compen-
sation and Liability Act). In order to remain consistent with
the mainframe system, this PC version of OCCSS is written
in SAS, and requires that SAS/PC be installed on the host
PC. It will load analytical data from diskettes into SAS file
format, perform technical edits on data, produce technical
defect and summary reports, and reproduce forms which
contain defects. In addition, OCCSS includes software to
assist in identifying these critical structural defects in the
data format, to assist in identifying these for correction prior
to performing technical edits.

Specifications; The software is on one 5 1/4 inch diskette,
1.2M high density. File format: Executable code. Documenta-
tion included; may be ordered separately as PB92-169564.
System: IBM AT/PS2 or compatible; MS DOS Version 3.3
operating system. Language: Base SAS. 2MB of RAM with
memory over 640K configured as expanded memory. Hard
disk with at least 10MB of available space. Printer with wide
carriage or ability to compress print. Supersedes PB93-
506053. See also PB93-505352 and PB94-500642. 1 dis-
kette.

Subject index keywords: Software, Organic compounds,
Waste management, Contract management, Organic Con-
tract Compliance Screening System.

0054 Organic Contract Compliance Screening System
(OCCSS) Software (SOW February 1988) (for
Microcomputers)

Order Number PB92-501501CDH, price: D02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jun 90
OCCSS software is a version of a mainframe-based applica-
tion developed for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agen-
cy's National Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). OCCSS is
designed to automate the determination of contractual com-
pliance and completeness of data submitted to the EPA
under the Routine Analytical Services (RAS) programs of
CERCLA (Comprehensive Environmental Response Compen-
sation and Liability Act). In order to remain consistent with
the mainframe system, this PC version of OCCSS is written
in SAS, and requires that SAS/PC be installed on the host
PC. It will load analytical data from diskettes into SAS file
format, perform technical edits on data, produce technical
defect and summary reports, and reproduce forms which
contain defects. In addition, OCCSS includes software to
assist in identifying these critical structural defects in the
data format, to assist in identifying these for correction prior
to performing technical edits.

Specifications; The software is on one (1) 5 1/4 inch dis-
kette, 1.2M high density. File format: ASCII. Documentation
included; may be ordered separately as PB92-145580.

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Contracting &

Contracts Integrity

System: IBM AT/PS2 or compatible: MS DOS Version 3.3
operating system. Language: Base SAS. 1 diskette.

Subject index keywords: Software, Organic compounds,
Environmental surveys, Waste management, Analytical
chemistry, Organic Contract Compliance Screening System.

0055 Organic Contract Compliance Screening System
(OCCSS) Software (SOW March 1990) (Version 1) (for
Microcomputers)

Order Number PB92-501527CDH, price: D02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 90
OCCSS software is a version of a mainframe-based applica-
tion developed for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agen-
cy's National Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). ICCSS is
designed to automate the determination of contractural com-
pliance and completeness of data submitted to the EPA
under the Routine Analytical Services (RAS) programs of
CERCLA (Comprehensive Environmental Response Compre-
hensive and Liability Act). In order to remain consistent with
the mainframe system, this PC version of OCCSS is written
in SAS, and requires that SAS/PC be installed on the host
PC. It will load analytical data from diskettes into SAS file
format, perform technical edits on data, produce technical
defect and summary reports, and reproduce forms which
contain defects. In addition, ICCSS Includes software to
assist in identifying these criteria structural defects in the
data format, to assist in identifying these for correction prior
to performing technical edits.

Specifications: The software is on one (1) 5 1/4 inch dis-
kette, 1.2M high density. File format: ASCII. Documentation
included; may be ordered separately as PB92-145572.
System: IBM AT / PS2 or compatible; MS DOS Version 3.3
operating system. Language: Base SAS. 1 diskette.

Subject index keywords: Environmental surveys, Software,
Waste management, Organic compounds, Analytical chemis-
try, Organic Contract Compliance Screening System.

0056 Organic Contract Compliance Screening System
(OCCSS) Software (SOW OLM01.8 Version January 1992)
(Version 1) (for Microcomputers)

Order Number PB92-501535CDH, price: D02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 92
OCCSS software is a version of a mainframe-based applica-
tion developed for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agen-
cy's National Contract Laboratory Program (CLP). OCCSS is
designed to automate the determination of contractural com-
pliance and completeness of data submitted to the EPA
under the Routine Analytical Services (RAS) programs of
CERCLA (Comprehensive Environmental Response Compre-
hensive and Liability Act). In order to remain consistent with
the mainframe system, this PC version of OCCSS is written
in SAS, and requires that SAS/PC be installed on the host
PC. It will load analytical data from diskettes into SAS file
format, perform technical edits on data, produce technical
defect and summary reports, and reproduce forms which
contain defects. In addition, OCCSS includes software to
assist in identifying these critical structural defects in the
data format, to assist in identifying these for correction prior
to performing technical edits.

Specifications: The software is on one (1) 5 1/4 inch dis-
kette, 1.2M high density. File format: ASCII. Documentation
included; may be ordered separately as PB92-145564.

System: IBM AT / PS2 or compatible; MS DOS Version 3.3
operating system. Language: Base SAS. Supersedes PB9G-
591690. Other formats available as PB92-501519 (ICCSS). 1
diskette.

Subject index keywords: Analytical chemistry, Environmen-
tal surveys, Organic compounds, Software, Waste manage-
ment, Organic Contract Compliance Screening System.

0057 Organic Contract Compliance Screening System.
Software for the PC (OLM01.8 Version 1). User Manual

Order Number PB92-145564CDH, price: PC A06/MF AQ2
Viar and Co., Alexandria, VA. Environmental Services Div.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 92
The OCCSS software is a version of a mainframe-based ap-
plication developed for the EPA's National Contract Labora-
tory Program (CLP). OCCSS is designed to automate the de-
termination of contractual compliance and completeness of
data submitted to EPA under the RAS programs of CERCLA
(Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,
and Liability Act) and SARA (Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act). The manual provides the user with in-
structions for running OCCSS software on the PC. Descrip-
tions of and instructions for each menu are detailed in the
following sections. The user should have a working knowl-
edge of PC DOS prior to utilizing this system. The following
sections present the OCCSS operating environment, de-
scribe system output (reports), provide instructions for run-
ning the system and generating reports, and specify input
data requirements. Examples of reports are contained in Ap-
pendix A. Appendix B contains descriptions of sample suffix
codes and report defect codes. Appendix C is a listing of
defect statements by criterion, with associated SOW refer-
ences. Appendix D contains data file formats from Exhibit H
of the SOW. Since OCCSS PC software is implemented
using Base SAS Software, the 'SAS Language Guide for Per-
sonal Computers' from The SAS Institute, Inc. in Cary, North
Carolina may be helpful.

Specifications: For system on diskette see, PB92-501535.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. 117p.
Subject index keywords: User manuals(Computer pro-
grams), Environmental surveys, Waste management, Analyti-
cal chemistry, Organic compounds, Organic Contract Compli-
ance Screening System.

0058 Organic Contract Compliance Screening System.
Software for the PC (OLM01.8 Version 2) (User Manual)

Order Number PB92-169564CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Viar and Co., Alexandria, VA. Environmental Services Div.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 1992
The OCCSS software is a version of a mainframe-based ap-
plication developed for the EPA's National Contract Labora-
tory Program (CLP). OCCSS is designed to automate the de-
termination of contractual compliance and completeness of
data submitted to EPA under the RAS programs of CERCLA
(Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,
and Liability Act) and SARA (Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act). The manual provides the user with in-
structions for running OCCSS software on the PC. Descrip-
tions of and instructions for each menu are detailed in the

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT; Contracting &
Contracts Integrity

following sections. The user should have a working knowl-
edge of PC DOS prior to utilizing the system.

Specifications: For system on diskette see PB92-502202.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. 106p.
Subject Index keywords: User manuals(Computer pro-
grams), Pollution regulations, Organic compounds, Waste
management, Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System.

0059 Organic Contract Compliance Screening System.
Software for the PC {SOW March 1990, Version 1). User
Manual

Order Number PB92-145572CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
Viar and Co., Alexandria, VA. Environmental Services Div.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 90
The Organic Contract Compliance Screening System
(OCCSS) software is a version of a mainframe-based appli-
cation developed for the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency's National Contract Laboratory Program (CLP).
OCCSS is designed to automate the determination of con-
tractual compliance and completeness of data submitted to
EPA under the Routine Analytical Services (RAS) programs
of CERCLA (Comprehensive Environmental Response Com-
pensation and Liability Act) and SARA (Superfund Amend-
ments and Reauthorization Act). The manual provides the
user with instructions for running OCCSS software on the
PC. Descriptions of and instructions for each menu are de-
tailed in the following sections. The user should have a work-
ing knowledge of PC DOS prior to utilizing this system. The
following sections present the OCCSS operating environ-
ment, describe system output (reports), provide instructions
for running the system and generating reports, and specify
input data requirements. Examples of reports are contained
in Appendix A. Appendix B contains descriptions of sample
suffix codes and report defect codes. Appendix C is a listing
of defect statements by criterion with associated SOW refer-
ences. Data Format A and the Agency Standard from the Or-
ganic RAS SOW (3/90) are included as Appendix D. Since
OCCSS PC software is implemented using Base SAS Soft-
ware, the 'SAS Language Guide for Personal Computers'
from The SAS Institute, Inc. in Gary, North Carolina may be
helpful.

Specifications: For system on diskette see, PB92-501527.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. 174p.
Subject index keywords: User manuals(Computer pro-
grams), Analytical chemistry, Environmental surveys, Organic
compounds, Waste management, Organic Contract Compli-
ance Screening System.

0060 Organic Contract Compliance Screening System.
Software for the PC (Version June 1990). User Manual

Order Number PB92-145580CDH, price; PC A08/MF A02
Viar and Co., Alexandria, VA. Environmental Services Div.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jun 90
The Organic Contract Compliance Screening System
(OCCSS) software is a version of a mainframe based appli-
cation developed by Viar and Company for the U.S. Environ-
mental Protection Agency's National Contract Laboratory
Program (CLP). OCCSS is designed to automate the determi-
nation of contractual compliance and completeness of data

submitted to EPA under the Routine Analytical Services
(RAS) programs of CERCLA (Comprehensive Environmental
Response Compensation and Liability Act) and SARA (Su-
perfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act). The manual
provides the user with instructions for running OCCSS soft-
ware on the PC. Descriptions of and instructions for each
menu are detailed in the following sections. The user should
have a working knowledge of PC DOS prior to utilizing this
system. The following sections present the OCCSS operating
environment, describe system output (reports), provide in-
structions for running the system and generating reports, and
specify input data requirements. Examples of reports are
contained in Appendix A. Appendix B contains descriptions
of sample suffix codes and report defect codes. Appendix C
is a listing of defect statements by criterion with associated
SOW references. Data Formats A and B from the Organic
RAS SOW (2/88) are included as Appendix D. Since OCCSS
PC software is implemented using Base SAS Software, the
'SAS Language Guide for Personal Computers' from The
SAS Institute, Inc. in Gary, North Carolina may be helpful.
Specifications: For system on diskette see, PB92-501501.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. 159p.
Subject index keywords: Environmental surveys, Waste
management, Analytical chemistry. User manuals(Computer
programs), Organic compounds, Organic Contract Compli-
ance Screening System.

0061 Performance Tracking under ARCS Contracts

Order Number PB93-963276CDH, price: PC AG1/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 8 Sep 92
The directive discusses the development of a non-resource
intensive method for reporting performance based work allo-
cation results under the ARCS (Alternative Remedial Con-
tracting Strategy) contractors.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Alternative Remedial Contracting Strategy.

0062 Procedures to Ensure that CLP Laboratories Are
Not Paid for Non-Compliant or Unuseable Data

Order Number PB94-963214CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 12 Aug 93
The memo reviews and emphasizes procedures for ensuring
that CLP laboratories are not paid for non-compliant or un-
useable data.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Laboratories, Inspec-
tion.

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Contracting &

Contracts Integrity

0063 Reassignment of CLP Transportation Functions

Order Number PB93-963501CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 19 Jan 93
The directive discusses the reassignment of the responsibil-
ity of providing CLP (Contract Laboratory Program) sample
coolers to the regions and their support contractors.
Specifications; Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400), Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 4p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0064 Regional Pilot Projects and Initiatives

Order Number PB92-963259CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 28 Jan 92
The directive discusses the initiation of regional pilot projects
designed to make NPL site cleanup more effective, efficient,
and/or equitable. Pilot projects will demonstrate innovative
ways to accomplish this objective at NPL and will, if success-
ful, offer similar opportunities at other sites.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, De-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 5p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0065 Required Contracts Management Training for
Regional Superfund Personnel

Order Number PB93-963258CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste arid Emergency Response; 7 Jul 92
The memorandum establishes the required training regarding
the management of contracts for all regional Superfund pro-
gram personnel.

Specifications; Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; ail others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 3p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Training, Contract
management.

0066 Resources for Preparing Independent Government
Estimates for Remedial Contracting Work Assignments

Order Number PB93-963267CDH, price: PC A01 /MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 5 Aug 92
The memorandum provides information regarding the avail-
ability of tools, data bases, and assistance for developing in-
dependent government estimates of the cost of work to be
performed by contractors for remedial work assignments.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB92-963257. 5p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment, Contract administration, Superfund.

0067 Response Action Contractor Final Indemnification
Guidelines, Volume 2, Number 1, March 1993

Order Number PB93-963290CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 93
The Final Guidelines supersede EPA's Interim Guidance on
Indemnification which, since 1987, has prescribed the stand-
ard terms and conditions for indemnification agreements with
Superfund response action contractors (RACs). Under
CERCLA Section 119, EPA has discretionary authority to in-
demnify RACs for third-party damage claims based on negli-
gent release during a response action. The Rnal Guidelines
affect all response action contracts, including ARCS, ERCS,
TES, and TAT, The Guidelines also impact grants, contracts
issued by States under cooperative agreements with EPA,
closed contracts, and contracts awarded by the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers and other Federal agencies operating
under interagency agreements with EPA to cleanup Super-
fund sites.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal,

0068 Revision of Policy Regarding Superfund Project
Assignment between Alternative Remedial Contracting
Strategy Contractors and the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers

Order Number PB92-963327CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 10 Dec 91
The report revises the policy for assigning Superfund remedi-
al work to EPA Alternative Remedial Contracting Strategy
(ARCs) contractors and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE).

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Government
policies, Waste management, Superfund.

0069 Roles and Responsibilities of Deputy Project
Officers and Work Assignment Managers under the
Technical Enforcement Support (TES) Contracts

Order Number PB91-139741CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 17 Feb 88
The directive provides a list of duties and responsibilities that
Regional contacts who will now serve as Deputy Project Offi-
cers under Headquarters Project Officers for the TES con-
tracts, must now perform in managing and administering
these contracts.

Specifications: See also PB91-139758. 12p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Technical Enforcement Support Contract.

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Contracting &
Contracts Integrity

0070 Roles and Responsibilities of Regional Project
Officers, Zone Project Officers, Work Assignment
Managers and Contracting Officers for the RCRA
Enforcement, Permitting and Assistance Contracts
(REPA)

Order Number PB94-963614CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 22 Feb 94
This directive sets out the roles and responsibilities of the
Regional Project Officers (RPOs), Headquarters Zone Project
Officers (ZPOs), Work Assignment Managers (WAMs) and
Contracting Officers (COs) of the RCRA Enforcement Permit-
ting and Assistance (REPA) Contracts.

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Contractor personnel, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, REPA contracts.

0071 Sampler's Guide to the Contract Laboratory
Program

Order Number PB91-921330CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 90
The Sampler's Guide provides gu idance and direction to
program clients. It is designed to clarify sampling procedures
necessary to submit samples for CLP analysis. The Sam-
pler's Guide acts as a reference for the Regions and sam-
pling contractors to promote consistency in sampling proce-
dures throughout the Regions and ensure the proper adher-
ence to CLP requirements.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Guidelines, Sample
preparation, Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Contract Laboratory Program.

0072 Superfund Contracts Management Issues

Order Number PB92-963257CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 31 Jan 92
The directive initiates new requirements regarding the devel-
opment of independent government cost estimates, review of
contractor invoices, and the appropriate participation on Per-
formance Evaluation Boards.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Contract administration, Superfund.

0073 Superfund Program Management Manual, Fiscal
Year 1994

Order Number PB94-963247CDH, price: Standing Order, call
for price

Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 94
The information in the Manual is targeted to Unit, Section,
and Branch Chiefs. Its primary purpose is to provide: The pri-

mary program goals and priotities for FY94; and An overview
of the Superfund program management processes (planning,
accomplishment reporting and program evaluation, and re-
source allocation). The FY 94 Superfund Program Manage-
ment Manual consists of information on: Manager's schedule
of significant events; Program goals and priorities; Program
planning and reporting requirements; and Financial manage-
ment and PTE distribution. Appendix A contains targets/
measures and definitions for site screening and assessment/
regional decision, early and long-term actions, program sup-
port activities, enforcement, and Federal Facilities.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required ($100 U.S., Canada, and Mexico; ail
others $200). Single copies also available in paper copy or
microfiche. 249p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Project management.

0074 Superfund Response Action Contracts

Order Number PB93-963292CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; May 93
The fact sheet discusses the EPA's Response Action Con-
tracts to provide professional architect/engineer services to
support response planning and oversight of activities, includ-
ing contract services required, contract structure, and the
procurement process.

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, US EPA, Contract ad-
ministration, Technical assistance, Waste management.

0075 Technical Assistance Team (TAT) Contracts Users'
Manual

Order Number PB92-963407CDH, price: PC A09/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 91
The report provides information and guidance on manage-
ment and implementation of EPA's 'Technical Assistance
Team (TAT) for Emergency Response, Removal, and Pre-
vention' contracts. Also, the study describes the necessary
procedures and requirements that should be followed in
managing contracts.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; ail others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Supersedes PB91-214163. 178p,
Subject index keywords: Technical assistance, Contract
management, Superfund.

0076 Treatability Studies Contractor Work Assignments

Order Number PB90-273962CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 12 Jul 90
The directive requires all future remedial and removal work
assignments involving treatability studies to contain a provi-
sion requiring the contract or to provide the Agency's Super-
fund Data Base with a copy of the work products.

Specifications: 4p.

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Planning &

Program Management

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment, Superfund, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Re-
sponse, Waste management

0077 USEPA Contract Laboratory Program National
Functional Guidelines for Organic Data Review

Order Number PB94-963501CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 93
The document is intended to assist in the technical review of
analytical data generated through the CLP. The data review
process provides information on analytical limitations of a
data based Quality Control (QC) criteria.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Laborato-
ries, Chemical analysis, Superfund.

0078 User's Guide to Contract Laboratory Program

Order Number PB90-186396CDH, price: PC A12/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 88
Describes an organic and inorganic analytical program and
outlines CLP protocols implemented into CLP analysis con-
tracts in 1987 (inorganic) and 1988 (organic). Contains criti-
cal information for CLP samplers and user groups of EPA
and of the States.

Specifications: 255p.

Subject index keywords: Guides(lnstructions), Laboratories,
Contract administration, Superfund program, Contract Labo-
ratory Program.

0079 User's Guide to the Contract Laboratory Program

Order Number PB91-214296CDH, price; PC A13/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 86
The document was specifically prepared for the guidance
and direction of program clients. The organic and inorganic
analytical program descriptions herein outline the require-
ments and analytical procedures of the new CLP protocols
developed from technical caucus recommendations. These
protocols were implemented into CLP analysis contracts in
1985. Other analytical programs, procedures and documenta-
tion described herein reflect the status of the program as of
July 1986.

Specifications: 278p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Chemical analysis, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, Contract Laboratory Pro-
gram.

0080 User's Guide to the Contract Laboratory Program

Order Number PB91-921278CDH, price; PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 91
The report describes an organic and inorganic analytical pro-
gram and outlines Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) proto-
cols. Contains critical information for CLP samplers and user
groups in EPA and the states.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,

and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 75p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Laborato-
ries, Superfund.

ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT:

Docket & Program Management

0081 Superfund Docket Operations Manual for
Rulemaking Activities

Order Number PB91-921349CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Booz-Allen and Hamilton, Inc., Bethesda, MD.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency
and Remedial Response; Jul 90

The directive discusses the purpose of the SDIC Operations
Manual for Rulemaking Activities which is to serve as a pro-
cedural guide for SDIC staff when a rulemaking docket is
prepared. These procedures are evaluated on a regular
basis, and are revised as needed to keep the SDIC oper-
ationally efficient and responsive to its users.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300), Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Sponsored by Environmental Pro-
tection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and
Remedial Response. 73p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Manuals, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Superfund Docket and Information
Center.

ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT:

Planning & Program Management

0082 Accelerated Response at NPL Sites Guidance
(Superfund Management Review: Recommendation No.
22)

Order Number PB90-258302CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 15 Dec 89
The directive communicates Agency guidance on accelerat-
ing responses at National Priorities List (NPS) sites.
Specifications: 19p.

Subject index keywords: Regulations, Superfund, Prereme-
dial action, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response,
National Priorities List.

0083 Additional Guidance on 'Worst Sites' and 'NPL
Caliber Sites' to Assist In SACM Implementation

Order Number PB94-963206CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 26 Aug 93
The document is intended to assist the Regions by giving
clear guidance as to what constitutes NPL caliber sites and
to assist in minimizing the potential for 'false positive' NPL
packages. It also sets forth the actions needed to support
the efforts to implement SACM and encourage appropriate
data gathering to support NPL listing and RI/FS decisions.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Planning &
Program Management

and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche, 6p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Risk assessment, Re-
medial action, Site surveys.

0084 Assessing Sites under SACM: Interim Guidance.
Volume 1, Number 4, Deccember 1992

Order Number PB93-963265CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The purpose of the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
(SACM) is to make Superfund cleanups more timely and effi-
cient. This will be accomplished through more focus on the
front end of the process and better integration of all Super-
fund program components. The bulletin discusses assessing
sites under SACM.

Subject index keywords: Site surveys, Superfund, Remedial
action, Waste management, Cleanup operations, Superfund
Accelerated Cleanup Model.

0085 Audit Management Process. Reference Guide

Order Number PB94-963232CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 94
Federal law requires Executive and Federal Branch agencies
to institute programs designed to respond to and follow-up
on audits issued by the Agency's Office of inspector General
(OIG) and the General Accounting Office (GAO), the two
main bodies which audit EPA programs and activities. The
audit management process is comprised of three main activi-
ties; cooperating with auditors to provide information, re-
sponding to the audits, and implementing audit recommenda-
tions to correct deficiencies found during the investigation.
The reference guide is designed to describe the audit man-
agement process, relevant terms, roles and responsibilities
of participants, and helpful hints and tools for full compli-
ance. General language is used to discuss the overall proc-
ess within EPA, but this guide is primarily geared toward
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER)
and Office of Emergency and Remedial Response (OERR)
managers and staff.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400), Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 36p,

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Auditing.

0086 Audits and the Superfund Program Manager

Order Number PB90-272717CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 90
The fact sheet describes why audits of all parties to Cooper-
ative Agreements and Superfund State Contracts (SSCs) are
good business practices and how audits help EPA protect
the financial integrity of Superfund response agreements.
Specifications: 4p.

Subject index keywords: Project management, Auditing,
Superfund, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response,
Waste management.

0087 Audits and the Superfund Program Manager

Order Number PB92-963328CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 91
The report describes why audits of all parties to Cooperative
Agreements and Superfund State Contracts are good busi-
ness practices, and how audits help EPA protect the finan-
cial integrity of Superfund response agreements.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Supersedes PB90-272717. 2p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Project management, Auditing, Superfund.

0088 Community Relations: Use of Senior Environmental
Employees in Superfund (Superfund Management
Review: Recommendation 43.K,L)

Order Number PB90-273749CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 31 Aug 90
The directive describes the use of Senior Environmental Em-
ployees in the Superfund program and offers guidance on
their future use.

Specifications: 6p.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Personnel,
Elderly persons, Superfund, Community relations, Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Citizen participation,
Waste management.

0089 Early Action and Long-Term Action under SACM:
Interim Guidance, Volume 1, Number 2, December 1992
Order Number PB93-963263CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92

The purpose of the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
(SACM) is to make Superfund cleanups more timely and effi-
cient. This will be accomplished through more focus on the
front end of the process and better integration of all Super-
fund program components. The SACM Bulletin discusses
early and long term actions that the Region should consider
taking under SACM,

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Remedial action, Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model,
Cleanup operations.

0090 Enforcement under SACM: Interim Guidance.

Volume 1, Number 3, December 1992

Order Number PB93-963264CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The purpose of the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
(SACM) is to make Superfund cleanups more timely and effi-
cient. This will be accomplished through more focus on the
front end of the process and better integration of all Super-

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT-. Planning &

Program Management

fund program components. The bulletin discusses major en-
forcement areas affected by SACM including: The timing and
methodology of PRP searches; timing and content of negoti-
ations with PRPs; notice letters; consultations for early ac-
tions; state involvement in enforcement; de minimis settle-
ments; the availability and adequacy of administrative
records; and cost recovery and cost documentation.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 7p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Waste management, Hazardous materials, Superfund Accel-
erated Cleanup Model.

0091 Exercising Flexibility through the Superfund
Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM)

Order Number PB93-963253CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 92
The directive reaffirms the Office of Solid Waste and Emer-
gency Response's commitment to supporting regional offices
in soundly-based decision-making while implementing the Su-
perfund Accelerated Cleanup Model.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model.

0092 Expectations for Full Implementation of SACM

Order Number PB94-963219CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 28 Jan 94
Below are the expectations for implementation of the Super-
fund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM). They have been
jointly developed by Headquarters and the Regions. There
are a few key points to be emphasized: SACM is the usual
way of doing business at Superfund sites; Regions should
have an up-to-date site inventory and workplan; and Regions
substantially reduce the Site Inspection Prioritization (SIP)
backlog.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Site characterization,
SACM(Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model).

0093 Further Direction on Implementing the Superfund
Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM)

Order Number PB93-963291CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 27 Apr 93
The memorandum provides a summary of progress to date in
implementing SACM and refines goals and strategies in tran-
sitioning to full implementation in FY 1994.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, SACM(Superfund Accelerated Cleanup
Model).

0094 Guidance on Implementation of the Superfund
Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM) under CERCLA and
the NCP

Order Number PB93-963252CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 7 Jul 92
The directive provides a more precise description of the Su-
perfund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM) in order to
ensure its consistent application with CERCLA and the NCP.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche, 12p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model.

0095 Highlights: Superfund Program Management. Fiscal
Year 1993

Order Number PB93-963261CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 92
The manual is targeted to EPA Superfund Division Directors.
It is intended to provide an overview of Fiscal Year 1993 Su-
perfund program goals and management initiatives. Specifi-
cally the document contains information on strategic planning
goals and themes, program planning and budgeting, and
manager's schedule of significant events.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copes also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 37p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Project
management, Superfund.

0096 HSED SACM Report. Volume 1, Number 1, January
1993

Order Number PB93-963289CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of

Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Jan 93
The bulletin is issued by the Hazardous Site Evaluation Divi-
sion to keep regional staff up-to-date on program and proce-
dural changes resulting from the Superfund Accelerated
Cleanup Model.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste man-
agement, Remedial action, Superfund Accelerated Cleanup
Model(SACM), Waste removal.

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Planning &
Program Management

0097 Innovative Methods to Increase Public Involvement
in Superfund Community Relations (Superfund
Management Review Recommendation No. 43.A)

Order Number PB91-921344CDH, price; PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 30 Nov 90
The directive lists six (6) techniques proven effective in in-
creasing public involvement in the Superfund process. While
some are recent innovations, others were developed many
years ago, but new and better ways of using them have bol-
stered their effectiveness. These techniques are citizen work
groups, citizen superfund workshops, bilingual communica-
tion, citizen awards for participation, increased interviews,
and open hous availability sessions. The list does not pre-
tend to be exhaustive. Instead, it shows some of the out-
reach vehicles Regions have found to be particularly effec-
tive in encouraging citizen participation. Regions should
make every effort to integrate as many as possible of these
activities into the cleanup process.

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0098 Integrated Timeline for Superfund Site Management
(SMR 5,15)

Order Number PB91-139717CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 11 Jun 90
The directive displays the key steps and optimum duration of
phases in moving sites from identification to remediation. It is
the authors intention that the duration of key phases be
viewed as goals toward which will jointly work to move the
program.

Specifications: 15p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response,

0099 Involvement of Superfund Program Managers in
Superfund Response Agreement Audits

Order Number PB90-249731CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 12 Feb 90
The directive provides general reference information to Su-
perfund program managers about the audit process. The in-
formation in the Directive pertains primarily to audits of Co-
operative Agreements, but may be applied to audits of Su-
perfund State Contracts (SSCs).

Specifications: 20p.

Subject index keywords: Regulations, State government,
Auditing, Superfund, Remedial action, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response, Cooperative agreements.

0100 Making Superfund Documents Available to the
Public throughout the Cleanup Process, and Discussing
Site Findings and Decisions as They are Developed
(Superfund Management Review: No. 43 G, H, Q, R, T)

Order Number PB91-921322CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 5 Nov 90
The directive summarizes five recommendations for improv-
ing Superfund efforts towards timely release of information to
the public during site cleanup activities. It provides guidance
for the Regions to make documents available to the public
throughout the cleanup process and to discuss site findings
and decisions as they are developed for the sake of more
fully involving citizens in the cleanup process and ensuring
two way communication between Superfund staff and local
communities.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Remedial action, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response.

0101 Management Review of the Superfund Program

Order Number PB90-153875CDH, price: PC AG9/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; 1989
Contents; A clear strategy for Superfund; Strengthening en-
forcement and maximizing responsible party work at Super-
fund sites; Accelerating and improving remedial action; Bring-
ing innovative technologies to bear on pollution at superfund
sites to strengthen remedy selection; An aggressive program
of community involvement; Management and administration:
Freeing up the skills and tools to do the job; Accounting for
achievement: Communicating progress to the public.
Specifications: Also available from Supt. of Docs. See also
PB90-153883. 186p.

Subject index keywords: Management, Hazardous materi-
als, Pollution control, Superfund program.

0102 Management Review of the Superfund Program:
Implementation Plan

Order Number PB90-153883CDH, price: PC A08/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 21 Sep 89
The Superfund 90-Day Study set forth a comprehensive
long-term strategy for the Superfund Program. The basic ele-
ments of the strategy are to: Control acute threats immedi-
ately; Deal with the worst sites and worst problems first;
Carefully monitor and maintain sites over the long term; Em-
phasize enforcement to induce private-party cleanup; Seek
new technologies for more effective cleanup; Improve the ef-
ficiency of program operations; and Encourage full participa-
tion by communities.

Specifications: Also available from Supt. of Docs. See also
PB90-153875. 173p.

Subject index keywords: Management, Hazardous materi-
als, Pollution control, Superfund Program, 90 day study.

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Planning &

Program Management

0103 Mandatory Community Relations Training.

Superfund Management Review Implementation Product
(Recommendation; No, 43.P(i))

Order Number PB90-272592CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 1 Dec 89
The directive formally announces mandatory community rela-
tions training for Remedial Project Managers, On-Scene Co-
ordinators, and other Regional staff and managers who
attend public meetings or deal with the public. The directive
explains what the requirements are, and why the training is
necessary.

Specifications: 5p.

Subject index keywords: Personnel development, Project
management, Community relations, Superfund, Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response,

0104 Mandatory Training Requirements for OCSs and
RPMs

Order Number P390-272584CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 29 Sep 89
The directive formally announces the mandatory training re-
quirements for On-Scene Coordinators (OSCs) and Remedial
Project Managers (RPMs) at all levels. Addresses Congres-
sional, EPA management, and employee concerns raised
about the preparation of OSCs and RPMs to perform their
jobs.

Specifications: 6p.

Subject Index keywords*. Personnel development, Super-
fund, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

0105 Minimizing Problems Caused by Staff Turnover
(Superfund Management Review: Recommendation No.
43, M, N, O)

Order Number PB91-921345CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 19 Dec 90
The directive discusses problems resulting from staff turnov-
er that will likely occur if members of an affected community
are not aware that a staff change has been made or why it
has been made. The directive lists four (4) major steps de-
signed to ease the transition period and examples of how to
carry them out.

Subject index keywords-. Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0106 Overview of the Outyear Liability Model (OLM)

Order Number PB93-963259CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01

Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of

Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 93

The fact sheet provides an overview of the Outyear Liability

Model developed to assist EPA in projecting activity levels,

costs, and resource needs associated with the Superfund

Program.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,

and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 8p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Outyear Liability Model, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response.

0107 Overview of the Outyear Liability Model (OLM)

Order Number PB94-963215CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 93
The Outyear Liability Model (OLM) was developed to assist
the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Emer-
gency and Remedial Response (OERR) in projecting activity
levels, costs, and resource needs associated with the Super-
fund Program. Designed with a high degree of flexibility, the
OLM permits the user to vary assumptions and assess the
impact of policy changes on total Program obligations and
resource needs.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Supersedes PB93-963259. 7p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Outyear Liability Model.

0108 Planning for Sufficient Community Relations
(Superfund Management Review: No. 43A)

Order Number PB90-249533CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 7 Mar 90
The directive provides guidance to Regional staff on planning
for sufficient community relations at all stages of the Super-
fund process. The document identifies specific planning ac-
tivities that have been used successfully in the Regions.
Specifications: 10p.

Subject index keywords: Regulations, Project management,
Superfund, Management review, Community relations.

0109 Proposed Method to Evaluate the Effectiveness of
Community Involvement In Superfund (Superfund
Management Review: Recommendation Number 43.A)

Order Number PB90-273764CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 18 Sep 90
The directive describes a proposed method for evaluating
how effectively EPA's Superfund Community Involvement
program provides adequate and meaningful opportunities for
public participation in decisions made at Superfund Sites.
Specifications: 8p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Superfund,
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Community relations, Citizen participation.

Of 10 Regional Pilots and Applications of Superfund
Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM)

Order Number PB92-963273CDH, price: PC A01 /MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jun 92
The fact sheet describes the Regional pilot programs testing
the application of the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model,
and describes the major categories of pilots and the overall
status of the programs.

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Planning &
Program Management

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model, Pilot pro-
grams.

0111 SACM Regional Decision Teams; Interim Guidance.
Volume 1, Number 5, December 1992

Order Number PB93-B63266CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The purpose of the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
(SACM) is to make Superfund cleanups more timely and effi-
cient. This will be accomplished through more focus on the
front end of the process and better integration of all Super-
fund program components. The bulletin discusses the Re-
gional Decision Team under SACM. The Regional Decision
Team provides for broad participation across all program ele-
ments while placing emphasis on teamwork and Regional
and staff empowerment.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Remedial action, Regional Decision Team, Cleanup oper-
ations, Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model.

0112 SRIS System Overview and User's Guide

Order Number PB94-963233CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 94
Federal law requires Executive and Federal Branch agencies
to institute programs designed to respond to and follow up
on audits issued by the Agency's Office of Inspector General
(OIG) and the General Accounting Office (GAO), the two
main bodies which audit EPA programs and activities. The
audit management process is comprised of three main activi-
ties; cooperating with auditors to provide information, re-
sponding to audits, and implementing audit recommendations
to correct deficiencies found during the investigation. The
reference guide is designed to introduce the audit manage-
ment process tool available to the Office of Emergency and
Remedial Response (OERR) managers and staff, Superfund
Report Information System (SRIS): a description of SRIS and
its operation Is provided.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Pollution control, Au-
diting.

0113 Status of Key SACM Program Management Issues:
Interim Guidance, Volume 1, Number 1, December 1992

Order Number PB93-963262CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The purpose of the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
(SACM) is to make Superfund cleanups more timely and effi-
cient. This will be accomplished through more focus on the

fron end of the process aid better integration of all Super-
fund program components. The SACM Program Manage-
ment Update describes activities underway, planned, and re-
cently completed to refocus Superfund's program manage-
ment systems to support SACM implementation.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Bp.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Waste management, Management planning, Superfund Ac-
celerated Cleanup Model, Cleanup operations.

0114 Status of State Involvement in the Superfund
Program, FY 80 to FY 89

Order Number PB9Q-272725CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 90
The report summarizes state involvement throughout the Su-
perfund process since the passage of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA). The report includes the roles and responsibilities
of States; an overview of the Superfund process and phases
of response; an historical perspective on State involvement
in each phase of response at Superfund Sites; and a sum-
mary of State involvement In non-site specific activities.

Specifications: 37p.

Subject index keywords: Project planning, State govern-
ment, Superfund.

0115 Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Bulletin:
Presumptive Remedies for Municipal Landfill Sites.
Volume 2, Number 1, February 1993

Order Number PB93-963269CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Feb 93
Since Superfund's inception in 1980, the removal and reme-
dial programs have found that certain categories of sites
have similar characteristics, such as the types of contami-
nants present, past industrial use, or the environmental
media that are affected. Based on a wealth of information
acquired from evaluating and cleaning up these sites, Super-
fund is undertaking an initiative to develop presumptive rem-
edies that are appropriate for specific types of sites, contami-
nants, or both. The initiative is part of a larger program,
known as the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
(SACM), which is designed to speed all aspects of the Su-
perfund clean-up process. The objective of the presumptive
remedies initiative is to use clean-up techniques shown to be
effective in the past at similiarsite in the future. The use of
presumptive remedies will streamline removal actions, site
studies, and clean-up actions, thereby improving consistency,
reducing costs, and increasing the speed with which hazard-
ous waste sites are remediated.

Subject index keywords; Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Remedial action, Superfund Acceler-
ated Cleanup Model.

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Planning &

Program Management

0116 Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Bulletin:

Presumptive Remedies for Wood Treatment Facilities.
Volume 1, Number 2, May 1992

Order Number PB92-963361CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 92
Superfund is undertaking an initiative to develop presumptive
remedies that are appropriate for specific types of sites, con-
taminants, or both. The initiative is part of a larger program,
known as the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
(SACM), which is designed to speed all aspects of the Su-
perfund clean-up process. The issue of the Superfund Accel-
erated Cleanup Bulletin describes presumptive remedies for
wood treatment facilities.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Waste management, Wood preservatives, Hazardous materi-
als, Cleanup operations, Wood treatment facilities.

0117 Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Bulletin. Volume 1,
Number 1. Presumptive Remedies for Municipal Landfill
Sites

Order Number PB92-963367CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 92
The bulletin provides an overview of the presumptive reme-
dies initiative. The objective of the presumptive remedies ini-
tiative is to use clean-up technologies shown to be effective
in the past at similar sites in the future. The use of presump-
tive remedies will streamline removal actions, site studies,
and clean-up actions, thereby improving consistency, reduc-
ing costs, and increasing the speed with which hazardous
waste sites are remediated.

Subject Index keywords: Municipalities, Hazardous materi-
als, Pollution control, Superfund.

0118 Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Bulletin. Volume 1,
Number 3. Presumptive Remedies

Order Number PB92-963371CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 92
The bulletin outlines the Superfund efforts underway for de-
veloping presumptive remedies for various types of sites. The
objective of the presumptive remedies initiative is to use
clean-up techniques shown to be effective in the past at
similar sites in the future. The use of presumptive remedies
will streamline removal actions, site studies, and clean-up ac-
tions, thereby improving consistency, reducing costs, and in-
creasing the speed with which hazardous waste sites are re-
mediated.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Remedial action, Technology assess-
ment, Cleanup operations.

0119 Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM)

Order Number PB92-963263CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 92
The document details the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup
Model (SACM), the Office of Emergency and Remedial Re-
sponse's new model for streamlining and accelerating the
Superfund program. The concept has been designed to
make Superfund work better and deliver results the public
will value: (1) quick reduction of acute risks at all Superfund
sites (removal and remedial) and (2) restoration of the envi-
ronment over the long term.

Subject index keywords: Sites, Hazardous materials, Su-
perfund, Cleanup.

0120 Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM)
Coordination Strategy

Order Number PB94-963201CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 14 Sep 93
The memorandum introduces a coordination strategy that is
designed to promote the implementation of the Superfund
Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM).

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Directives, Cleanup.

0121 Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM):
Questions and Answers

Order Number PB93-963286CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01

Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of

Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Jul 93

The bulletin provides answers to issues the Regions have

raised on the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model

(SACM).

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Remedial action, SACM(Superfund Accelerated Clean-
up Model).

0122 Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM).
Volume 1, Number 4, November 1992

Order Number PB92-963287CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 92
The U.S. EPA currently is developing and implementing a
streamlined way to clean up hazardous waste sites known as
the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model, or SACM, It is
designed to make the Superfund Program more efficient by

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Planning &
Program Management

cutting years off of cleanups and quickly reducing risks to
people and the environment. This bulletin issue provides an
overview of the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200, U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 1 p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Mathematical models, Waste management, Superfund Accel-
erated Cleanup Model, Cleanup operations.

0123 Superfund Program and information Management
Update. Volume 1, Number 1, November 1993

Order Number PB94-963208CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Nov 93
This is the first edition of a new technical bulletin combining
the information previously found in the SCAP Bulletin, CER-
CLIS Connection, SMARTech Signal, and RP2M Reflection.
Merging these publications into an all-inclusive bulletin
serves two purposes: (1) it conforms to recent internal
Agency direction to ensure that all 'bulletins' be technical in
nature; and (2) it uses contractor and EPA funds more effi-
ciently.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Information manage-
ment, Program management.

0124 Superfund Program Implementation Manual, Fiscal
Year 1994. Volume 1. Program Goals and Planning
Requirements. Volume 2. Program Implementation
Procedures

Order Number PB94-963220CDH, price: PC A24/MF A04
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 93
The information in the manual is targeted to Information
Management Coordinators, Remedial Project Managers, and
On-Scene Coordinators. Its primary purpose is to provide
guidance to this audience on management of Superfund pro-
gram. The FY 94 Superfund Program Implementation Manual
consists of two volumes. Volume 1 contains information on
program goals and priorities, program planning and reporting,
and budget and workload models. Volume 2 includes appen-
dices providing information on specific programs and acts
and their applicability to Superfund Comprehensive Accom-
plishments Program (SCAP).

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management.

0125 Superfund Responsiveness Summaries (Superfund
Management Review: Recommendation Number 43E)

Order Number PB90-273731CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 4 Jun 90
The directive describes the background of responsiveness
summaries and outlines a new format intended to provide
summaries that can deal thoroughly with complicated legal

and technical issues while maintaining true responsiveness
to local communities.

Specifications: 6p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Superfund,
Management review, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Waste management, Community relations.

0126 Superfund Strategic Plan and Implementation
Strategy Fiscal Year 1994

Order Number PB94-963245CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 94
This Plan presents the Superfund Program's strategic direc-
tion for Fiscal Year 1994. The Vision for the program is: Build
public confidence in the Superfund and Oil Pollution Re-
sponse Programs; The Mission for the program is: Super-
fund: dedicated to reducing risks to people and the environ-
ment by cleaning up the Nation's hazardous waste problems
and making polluters pay.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB94-983246. 73p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Program
management, Cleanup, Pollution control, Superfund, Strate-
gic planning.

0127 Superfund Strategic Plan and Implementation
Strategy Fiscal Year 1994: Office and Division Plans

Order Number PB94-963246CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 94
The Plan presents the Superfund Program's strategic direc-
tion for Fiscal Year 1994. The Vision for the program is: Build
public confidence in the Superfund and Oil Pollution Re-
sponse Programs; The Mission for the program is: Super-
fund: dedicated to reducing risks to people and the environ-
ment by cleaning up the Nation's hazardous waste problems
and making polluters pay. Oil Pollution: dedicated to ensuring
the protection of human health and the environment from oil
pollution.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; ail others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB94-963245. 122p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Program
management, Cleanup, Pollution control, Superfund, Strate-
gic planning.

0128 Using State and Local Officials to Assist in
Community Relations (Superfund Management Review:
Recommendation No. 43.K.L)

Order Number PB91-921320CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 28 Sep 90
The report outlines the suggestion and discusses specific
methods for using State and local officials to increase Super-
fund's communication with the public. The study discusses
recommendations that describe the use of State and local
officials to serve as liaisons, to provide and maintain informa-
tion, and to assist in public meetings.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, da-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special

Reports

and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 8p.

Subject index keywords: Community relations, Hazardous
materials, Superfund, US EPA.

ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT:

Special Reports

0129 Assurance of Hazardous Waste Capacity, Guidance
to State Officials. Assistance in Fulfilling the
Requirements of CERCLA 104(c)(9)

Order Number PB91-214171CDH, price: PC AG5/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 88
The document supplies guidance to state officials on provid-
ing assurances required by Section 104(c)(9) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liabil-
ity Act, as amended ('CERCLA* or 'Superfund'). This section
of CERCLA requires states in which remedial actions may be
taken to provide assurances, prior to EPA taking or funding
such actions, of the availability of hazardous waste treatment
or disposal facilities which have adequate capacity to
manage the hazardous wastes expected within the state
over twenty years. The Guidance Document reflects EPA's
current understanding of the statutory requirements and de-
scribes how EPA currently suggests that states implement
these requirements. The guidance provides substantial infor-
mation to states, including suggested language for the con-
tracts and cooperative agreements to be signed, instructions
on the preparation of state Capacity Assurance Plans (CAPs)
that can form a basis for the assurances, and a model for
the interstate agreements or regional agreement or authority
required when addressing access to capacity in other states.
Specifications: 81 p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0130 CERCLA/Superfund Orientation Manual

Order Number PB93-193852CDH, price: PC A09/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Oct 92
The manual serves as a program orientation guide and refer-
ence document, and it is designed to assist EPA and State
personnel involved with hazardous waste remediation, emer-
gency response, and chemical and emergency prepared-
ness. The Manual describes the organizational and oper-
ational components of the Superfund Program.
Specifications: 179p,

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, CERCLA.

0131 CERCLA Waste Capacity Assurance

Order Number PB90-2745Q7CDH, price: PC A01 /MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 90
The fact sheet discusses waste capacity assurance, which is
one of the five assurances required of a State by CERCLA
before the hazardous waste Trust Fund (Superfund) can be
used for a remedial action. The sheet describes the statutory
goals associated with the waste capacity assurance, the Ca-

pacity Assurance Plan (CAP), and additional sources of infor-
mation.

Specifications: 5p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Capacity,
Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Remedial action.

0132 Cleaning Up the Nation's Waste Sites: Markets and
Technology Trends

Order Number PB93-140762CDH, price: PCS17.50
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Technology Innovation Office,; Department of Defense,
Washington, DC.**Department of Energy, Washington, DC;
Apr 93

Over the next 20 to 30 years, federal, state, and local gov-
ernments and private industry will commit billions of dollars
annually to clean up sites contaminated with hazardous
waste and petroleum products. The report captures informa-
tion on the future demand for remediation services for all
major cleanup programs in the U.S., including Superfund, Re-
source Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) corrective
action, underground storage tanks, state programs, and fed-
eral agencies such as the Departments of Defense and
Energy. The market information should help innovative tech-
nology vendors, developers, and investors direct their re-
search, development, and commercialization efforts towards
pertinent waste programs and problems. The report makes
this market information available in one document. The
report provides a compilation of market data that are current-
ly available and descriptions of national cleanup programs,
improved access to data on domestic markets will help direct
the development of new technology and strengthen U.S. ca-
pabilities in environmental cleanup. As companies acquire
field experience in this country, they will be better equipped
to compete internationally.

Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Department of
Defense, Washington, DC., and Department of Energy,
Washington, DC. 173p.

Subject index keywords; Hazardous materials,
Wastes(lndustriai), Sites, Cleanup time, States(United
States).

0133 Compendium of Good Ideas: Models of Success and
Lessons Learned. Volume 1. Highlights

Order Number PB93-963271CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 93
The entries in Volume 1 illustrate measures undertaken in
each Regional office to improve implementation of the Su-
perfund Program.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Program management,
Improvement.

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports

0134 Compendium of Good Ideas: Models of Success and
Lessons Learned. Volume 2. Source Book

Order Number PB93-963272CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 93
The report Volume 2 of the Compendium of Good Ideas is
designed to be a reference document for all personnel in-
volved in the implementation of Superfund. It contains nu-
merous entries that provide the user with some information
about specific initiatives or activities undertaken in various
EPA Regional offices.

Specifications; Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also Volume 1, PB93-963271.
77p.

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Program management,
Government employees, Improvement.

0135 Ecosystem Effects of Superfund. National Priority
List Sites in Industrial Landscapes: A Framework for
Policy Decisions

Order Number PB90-256728CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Georgia Univ., Athens. Inst, of Ecology.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Cooperative
Environmental Management; 1 Dec 89
The report is part of the National Network for Environmental
Management Studies under the auspices of the Office of Co-
operative Environmental Management of the U.S. Environ-
mental Protection Agency. In order to comply with Superfund
legislation for National Priority List Sites having ecosystem
effects that are located in industrial settings the study recom-
mends different perspectives. A review of pertinent literature
was conducted in order to develop a framework for EPA per-
sonnel who are developing policy decisions in this area. It is
recommended that a landscape perspective be taken in
order to account for the cumulative, long term effects of the
industrial setting. Such effects may be much more significant
than the toxic waste site itself, and thus options such as cre-
ation or purchase of additional natural acreage elsewhere
may make more ecological sense. The placing of the Super-
fund effort in a landscape perspective requires a national,
muitiagency and interdisciplinary landscape management
plan in order to be feasible. Regardless of the decision made
in dealing with these types of NPL sites, a broadened ap-
proach must be taken that considers long term economic ef-
fects, and the overall goal of society. Types of questions that
need to be considered, as well as possible approaches that
can be used to achieve these ends are given.

Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Cooperative Environmen-
tal Management. 42p.

Subject Index keywords; Hazardous materials, Site sur-
veys, Industrial wastes, Superfund, Ecosystems, Toxic sub-
stances.

0136 Forum Focus, August 1993

Order Number PB93-232684CDH, price: PC A02/MF AOt
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Technology Innovation Office; Aug 93
Contents: Workgroup Updates; Sampling Workshop; Techni-
cal Support News; New Technical Forum; OWPE Risk As-
sessment Policy; RD/RA Guidance Development; and Issue
Paper Update.

Specifications: 6p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Newsletters.

0137 Guidance for Capacity Assurance Planning.

Capacity Planning Pursuant to CERCLA Section 104(c)(9)

Order Number PB93-209898CDH, price: PC A09/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; May 93
The Guidance document advises states on how to assure
adequate hazardous waste treatment and disposal capacity
for meeting the requirements of Section 104(c)(9) of the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,
and Liability Act (CERCLA or 'Superfund'), as amended, by
preparing 1993 Hazardous Waste Capacity Assurance Plans
(CAPs). It supersedes similar guidance documents issued in
December 1988 and April 1991, and should be used by
states for the 1993 Capacity Assurance Planning Process.
The document includes an overview of the Capacity Assur-
ance Planning Process, baseyear data, projections, and ad-
dressing shortfalls.

Specifications; 188p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Capacity assurance plans.

0138 Hazardous Waste Superfund Collection: Database
Thesaurus

Order Number PB91-131326CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Information Resources Management; Sep 90
The Hazardous Waste Superfund Collection Database The-
saurus provides an index to terminology related to hazardous
waste and facilitates the use of the Hazardous Waste Super-
fund Collection Database. The second edition of the Thesau-
rus includes several new features. New keywords have been
added to ensure that the Thesaurus reflects current con-
cerns in the field of hazardous waste. The Thesaurus is di-
vided into two parts: the Alphabetical List of Keywords and
the List of Corporate Sources. The first part lists the Data-
base indexing terms alphabetically with an accompanying
definition. Beneath each term are found other terms that
have been classified as 'broader' (BT), 'narrower' (NT), or
'related' (RT) to the listed keyword. The List of Corporate
Sources contains a complete list of names and acronyms for
organizational sources currently indexed within the collection.
The list will aid users in their search for documents prepared
by EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), offices or other
government agencies. Also included in the edition is a "Guide
to the Major Subject Headings' which consists of nine major
subject areas and their respective second tier terms.
Specifications: 61 p.

Subject index keywords: Thesauri, Hazardous materials,
Terminology, Subject index terms, Superfund data base.

0139 Index to the Monthly Hotline Report Questions
(June 1982 to December 1991)

Order Number PB92-131374CDH, price; PC A07/MF A02
Baoz-Allen and Hamilton, Inc., Bethesda, MD.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response; Dec 92

The document provides four indices to the question and
answer sections of the RCRA/Superfund/Oust Monthly Hot-
line Reports from June 1982 through December 1991. The

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special

Reports

first index is an alphabetical listing of question titles by year
and month. The second index organizes the questions by
regulatory citation, beginning with 40 CFR 257. The third
index organizes the questions by statuatory citation. Finally,
the fourth index references the questions by key word or
subject heading.

specifications: See also PB92-131242 and PB92-131390.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
DC. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. 130p.
Subject index keywords: Information management, Waste
management, Regulations, Indexes(Documentation), Hotline
Reports.

0140 Inside the Hotline: A Compilation of 1991 Monthly
Hotline Reports

Order Number PB92-131390CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Booz-Allen and Hamilton, Inc., Bethesda, MD.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response; Mar 92

The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)/Su-
perfund (SF)/Office of Underground Storage Tanks (OUST)
and Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know
(EPCRA) Hotlines were established to respond to inquiries
from the regulated community and the public concerning
waste management and disposal regulations. The Hotline
also serves as a referral point on the availability and distribu-
tion of program related documents and published materials.
The document is a compilation of questions and answers,
Federal Register summaries from individual Monthly Hotline
Reports for the period of January to December 1991. It also
contains user-friendly indices which are arranged according
to subject matter, regulatory and statory citations. The docu-
ment can be used by its reader to explore the application of
the regulations in different scenarios or to shed light on com-
plex issues. Neither the questions nor the FR summaries are
intended to fully represent or be used in place of the regula-
tions. For an understanding of the actual regulatory require-
ments in any given situation, the reader must consult the ap-
propriate sections of Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regula-
tions, pertinent FR and EPA guidance documents, as well as
relevant State regulations.

Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Solid Waste and Emer-
gency Response. 72p,

Subject index keywords: Information management, Waste
management, Regulations,

0141 Inside the Hotline: A Compilation of 1992 Monthly
Hotline Reports

Order Number PB93-159572CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Booz-Allen and Hamilton, inc., Bethesda, MD.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response; Mar 93
The document is a compilation of questions and answers,
Federal Register summaries from individual monthly Hotline
reports for the period of January to December 1992. It in-
cludes indices arranged by subject, regulatory citation, and
statutory citation. The reader can use the document to ex-
plore the application of the regulations to different scenarios
or to shed light on complex issues. Neither the answers to
questions nor the Federal Register summaries are intended
to fully represent or to be used in place of the regulations.

Specifications: See also PB92-131390. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response. 9Gp.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste man-
agement, Regulations, Waste disposal.

0142 NACEPT Committee Recommendations to
Administrator Browner

Order Number PB94-963211CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 4 Oct 93
The subgroup was charged with working on five distinct but
interrelated issues: Community Involvement/Empowerment;
Non-Discriminatory Implementation and Enforcement; Eco-
nomic Restoration/Security; Redevelopment of Cleanup
Sites; and Community-wide Environmental Quality Approach
(Including synergistic effects of multiple source cleanup ac-
tivities and risk tradeoffs in remedy selection). The subgroup
has prepared a set of statements on each issue. The state-
ments seek to reflect the level of agreement and disagree-
ment on each issue, as well as present strong minority views
where appropriate.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Solid waste manage-
ment, Hazardous materials,

0143 NACEPT Materials for Meeting Held on September
20-21, 1993

Order Number PB94-963209CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
Many affected communities believe their needs are not being
met by the Superfund (or other environmental) program. This
is particularly the case for Environmental Justice communi-
ties. In summary, the following issues have been raised re-
garding scope and established process of the Superfund pro-
gram: current benefits are generally limited to human and ec-
ological health improvements from site remediation; and cu-
mulative risk (from the site and other sources) is not often
considered in risk assessment and remedy selection at the
site, which may particularly affect minority and low income
communities.

Subject index keywords; Superfund, Solid waste manage-
ment, Hazardous materials.

0144 NACEPT Meeting. Held in Crystal City, Virginia on
February 11, 1994

Order Number PB94-963238CDH, price; PC A14/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 94
The purpose of the meeting is threefold: Bob Sussman and
Elliott Laws will give an overview of the Administration's Su-
perfund bill; EPA is interested in hearing preliminary reac-
tions to the bill's provisions; and EPA wants to discuss the
role of this Committee during the next phase of Superfund
reauthorization. The following document are included for

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports

review: The Administration's bill; The 'short' summary of the
bill; The 'regular' summary; Carol Browner's testimony before
the Subcommittee on Transportation and Hazardous Materi-
als; A vision statement which outlines the direction of the Ad-
ministration's bill; The statement issued by Carol Browner at
the press conference held February 3, 1994; A paper ex-
plaining the funding of environmental insurance resolution
reform; and A draft agenda for the meeting on February 11,
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 301 p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Pollution regulations,
Meetings.

0145 National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution
Contingency Plan (as Published in the Federal Register,
March 8, 1990)

Order Number PB90-160326CDH, price: PC A25/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 1990
The NCP is the major framework regulation for the Federal
hazardous substance response program. The NCP includes
procedures and standards for how EPA, other Federal agen-
cies, states and private parties respond under the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act (CERCLA) to releases of hazardous substances and
under the Clean Water Act to discharges of oil. These revi-
sions clarify the 1985 NCP language, reorganize the 1985
NCP to describe more accurately the sequence of response
actions, and incorporate changes based on program experi-
ence since the 1985 revisions to the NCP.

Specifications: 577p,

Subject index keywords: Crude oil, Hazardous materials,
Water pollution, National Contingency Plan, Oil spills.

0146 National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution
Contingency Plan (The NCP)

Order Number PB92-963261CDH, price: PC A15/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 92
The report contains the National Oil and Hazardous Sub-
stances Pollution Contingency Plan proposed and final rules
as published in 53 FR 51394 and 55 FR 8664, respectively.
The NCP document also contains tables of contents with
specific Federal Register page references and a key terms
index.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Oil pollution,
Pollution abatement, Emergencies, Superfund.

0147 National Priorities List Book Set

Order Number PB91-238725CDH, price; PCS675.00
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 1991
The report provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) sites. The set of documents compiles State-
Specific site summary fact sheets on each site being cleaned
up under the Superfund program. The individual state sites

are available as PB91-921207, and PB91-921209 thru PB91-
921258.

Specifications: Set includes PB91-921207 and PB91-
921209 through PB91-921258. 4262p-in 51v,

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Superfund.

0148 National Priorities List Sites: Alabama

Order Number P891-921209CDH, price: PC AG4/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 56p.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Alabama, Superfund, Cleanup.

0149 National Priorities List Sites: Alabama

Order Number PB92-963223CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921209. 64p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Alabama, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.

0150 National Priorities List Sites: Alabama, 1992

Order Number PB93-963201CDH, price:

Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program. Other individual documents are also available as.

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special

Reports

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Alabama, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.

0151 National Priorities List Sites: Alaska

Order Number PB91-921210CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 42 p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Alaska, Superfund, Cleanup.

0152 National Priorities List Sites: Alaska

Order Number PB92-963251CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Alaska, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.

0153 National Priorities List Sites: Alaska, 1992

Order Number PB93-963202CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Alaska, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.

0154 National Priorities List Sites: American Samoa,

Guam, and the Trust Territories

Order Number PB92-963242CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, American Samoa, Guam, Superfund, National Prior-
ities List, Cleanup.

0155 National Priorities List Sites: American Samoa,

Guam and Trust Territories

Order Number PB91-921258CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others S400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 36p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Guam and Trust Territories, Superfund, Cleanup.

0156 National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and Nevada

Order Number PB91 -921211CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports

move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche, 59p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Nevada, Superfund, Cleanup.

0157 National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and Nevada

Order Number PB92-963216CDH, price; PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Arizona, Nevada, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.

0158 National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and Nevada,
1992

Order Number PB93-963204CDH, price; PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and othersms. Compiles site summary
fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under the
Superfund Program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Arizona, Nevada, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.

0159 National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas

Order Number PB91-921212CDH, price; PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State

volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche, 53p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Arkansas, Superfund, Cleanup.

0160 National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas

Order Number PB92-963220CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Arkansas, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.

0161 National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas, 1992

Order Number PB93-963205CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles ate summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Arkansas, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.

0162 National Priorities List Sites: California

Order Number PB91-921213CDH, price; PC A10/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special

Reports

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, California, Superfund, Cleanup.

0163 National Priorities List Sites: California and Hawaii

Order Number PB92-963239CDH, price: PC A11/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

0164 National Priorities List Sites: California and Hawaii,
1992

Order Number PB93-963206CDH, price: PC A12/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, California, Hawaii, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.

0165 National Priorities List Sites: Colorado

Order Number PB91-921214CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-

ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 70p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Colorado, Superfund, Cleanup,

0166 National Priorities List Sites: Colorado

Order Number PB92-963237CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Colorado, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.

0167 National Priorities List Sites: Colorado, 1992

Order Number PB93-963207CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Colorado, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.

0168 National Priorities List Sites; Connecticut

Order Number PB91-921215CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports

describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 59p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Connecticut, Superfund, Cleanup.

0169 National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut

Order Number PB92-963203CDH, price:

Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

0170 National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut, 1992

Order Number PB93-963208CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State ate being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Connecticut, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.

0171 National Priorities List Sites: Delaware

Order Number PB91-921216CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Delaware, Superfund, Cleanup.

0172 National Priorities List Sites: Delaware

Order Number PB92-963228CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Delaware, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.

0173 National Priorities List Sites: Delaware, 1992

Order Number PB93-963209CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Delaware, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.

0174 National Priorities List Sites: Florida

Order Number PB91-921217CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special

Reports

orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 147p.

Subject index keywords; Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Florida, Superfund, Cleanup.

0175 National Priorities List Sites: Florida

Order Number PB92-963250CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clear'.y describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Florida, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.

0176 National Priorities List Sites: Florida, 1992

Order Number PB93-963210CDH, price; PC AQ8/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Florida, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.

0177 National Priorities List Sites: Georgia

Order Number PB91-921218CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-

ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; ail others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 59p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Georgia, Superfund, Cleanup.

0178 National Priorities List Sites: Georgia

Order Number PB92-963226CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Georgia. Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.

0179 National Priorities List Sites; Georgia, 1992

Order Number PB93-963211CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Georgia, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.

0180 National Priorities List Sites: Hawaii

Order Number PB91-921219CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating In site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports

move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit S200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 43p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Hawaii, Superfund, Cleanup.

0181 National Priorities List Sites: Idaho

Order Number PB91-921220CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required {minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 50p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Idaho, Superfund, Cleanup.

0182 National Priorities List Sites: Idaho

Order Number PB92-963219CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Idaho, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.

0183 National Priorities List Sites: Idaho, 1992

Order Number PB93-963212CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Idaho, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.

0184 National Priorities List Sites: Illinois

Order Number PB91-921221CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 111 p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Illinois, Superfund, Cleanup.

0185 National Priorities List Sites: Illinois

Order Number PB92-963248CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

0186 National Priorities List Sites: Illinois, 1992

Order Number PB93-963213CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT; Special

Reports

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; ail others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 120p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Illinois, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.

0187 National Priorities List Sites: Indiana

Order Number PB91-921222CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 108p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Indiana, Superfund, Cleanup.

0168 National Priorities List Sites: Indiana

Order Number PB92-963249CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Indiana, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.

0189 National Priorities List Sites: Indiana, 1992

Order Number PB93-963214CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,

and Mexico; all others $400), Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 120p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Indiana, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.

0190 National Priorities List Sites: Iowa

Order Number PB91-921223CDH, pries: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 75p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Iowa, Superfund, Cleanup.

0191 National Priorities List Sites: Iowa

Order Number PB92-963234CDH, price: PC A05/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Iowa, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.

0192 National Priorities List Sites: Iowa, 1992

Order Number PB93-963215CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400), Single copies also available in

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports

paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 78p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Iowa, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.

0193 National Priorities List Sites: Kansas

Order Number PB91-921224CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 53p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Kansas, Superfund, Cleanup.

0194 National Priorities List Sites: Kansas

Order Number PB92-963213CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Kansas, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.

0195 National Priorities List Sites: Kansas, 1992

Order Number PB93 963216CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Kansas, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.

0196 National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky

Order Number PB91-921225CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 66p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Kentucky, Superfund, Cleanup.

0197 National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky

Order Number PB92-963227CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Kentucky, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.

0198 National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky, 1992

Order Number PB93-963217CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dee 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program,

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special

Reports

Subject index keywords; Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Kentucky, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.

0199 National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana

Order Number PB91-921226CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 53p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Louisiana, Superfund, Cleanup.

0200 National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana

Order Number PB92-963222CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Louisiana, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.

0201 National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana, 1992

Order Number PB93-963218CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Louisiana, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.

0202 National Priorities List Sites: Maine

Order Number PB91-921227CDH, price: PC AQ4/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others S400). Single copies also available In
paper copy or microfiche. 55p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Maine, Superfund, Cleanup.

0203 National Priorities List Sites: Maine

Order Number PB92-963204CDH, price; PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

Subject index keywords; Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Maine, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.

0204 National Priorities List Sites: Maine, 1992

Order Number PB93-963219CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Maine, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.

0205 National Priorities List Sites: Maryland

Order Number PB91-921228CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 49p.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Maryland, Superfund, Cleanup.

0206 National Priorities List Sites: Maryland

Order Number PB92-963218CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Maryland, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.

0207 National Priorities List Sites: Maryland, 1992

Order Number PB93-963220CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Maryland, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.

0208 National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts

Order Number PB91-921229CDH, price; PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90

Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to dearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 90p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Massachusetts, Superfund, Cleanup.

0209 National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts

Order Number PB92-963206CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Puerto Rico, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.

0210 National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts, 1992

Order Number PB93-963221CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT; Special

Reports

paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250, 109p.

Subject index keywords; Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Massachusetts, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.

0211 National Priorities List Sites: Michigan

Order Number PB91-921230CDH, price: PC A1Q/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 202p.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Michigan, Superfund, Cleanup.

0212 National Priorities List Sites: Michigan

Order Number PB92-963247CDH, price: PC A10/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Michigan, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.

0213 National Priorities List Sites: Michigan, 1992

Order Number PB93-963222CDH, price: PC A10/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in

paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 208p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Michigan, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.

0214 National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota

Order Number PB91-921231CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 122p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Minnesota, Superfund, Cleanup.

0215 National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota

Order Number PB92-963211CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; ail others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921231. 133p.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Minnesota, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.

0216 National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota, 1992

Order Number PB93-963223CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program,

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports

and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 133p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Minnesota, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.

0217 National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi

Order Number PB91-921232CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 35p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Mississippi, Superfund, Cleanup.

0218 National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi

Order Number PB92-963224CDH, price; PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program,

Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400), Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921232, 47p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Mississippi, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.

0219 National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi, 1992

Order Number PB93-963224CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,

and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 46p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Mississippi, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.

0220 National Priorities List Sites: Missouri

Order Number PB91-921233CDH, price; PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 82p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Missouri, Superfund, Cleanup.

0221 National Priorities List Sites: Missouri

Order Number PB92-963214CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

Subject index keywords; Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Missouri, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.

0222 National Priorities List Sites: Missouri, 1992

Order Number PB93-963225CDH, price: PC A05/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program,

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special

Reports

and Mexico; all others $400), Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 98p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Missouri, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.

0223 National Priorities List Sites: Montana

Order Number PB91-921234CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 54p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Montana, Superfund, Cleanup.

0224 National Priorities List Sites: Montana

Order Number PB92-963235CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Montana, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.

0225 National Priorities List Sites: Montana, 1992

Order Number PB93-963226CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site, it clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in

paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 56p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Montana, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.

0226 National Priorities List Sites; Nebraska

Order Number PB91-921236CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 43p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Nebraska, Superfund, Cleanup.

0227 National Priorities List Sites: Nebraska

Order Number PB92-963233CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Nebraska, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.

0228 National Priorities List Sites: Nebraska, 1992

Order Number PB93-963227CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT; Special Reports

and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 60p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Nebraska, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.

0229 National Priorities List Sites: New Hampshire

Order Number PB91-921237CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 65p.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, New Hampshire, Superfund, Cleanup.

0230 National Priorities List Sites: New Hampshire

Order Number PB92-9632Q5CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, New Hampshire, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.

0231 National Priorities List Sites: New Hampshire, 1992

Order Number PB93-963228CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.

Specifications; Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,

and Mexico: all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 80p.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, New Hampshire, Superfund, National Priorities Lfst,
Cleanup.

0232 National Priorities list Sites: New Jersey

Order Number PB91-921235CDH, price: PC A13/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 276p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, New Jersey, Superfund, Cleanup.

0233 National Priorities List Sites: New Jersey

Order Number PB92-963241CDH, price: PC A13/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, New Jersey, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.

0234 National Priorities List Sites: New Jersey, 1992

Order Number PB93-963229CDH, price: PC A14/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special

Reports

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, New Jersey, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.

0235 National Priorities List Sites: New Mexico

Order Number PB91-921238CDH, price: PC AQ4/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 51 p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, New Mexico, Superfund, Cleanup.

0236 National Priorities List Sites: New Mexico

Order Number PB92-963232CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, New Mexico, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.

0237 National Priorities List Sites: New Mexico, 1992

Order Number PB93-963230CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, New Mexico, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.

0238 National Priorities List Sites: New York

Order Number PB91-921239CDH, price: PC A10/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 209p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, New York, Superfund, Cleanup.

0239 National Priorities List Sites: New York

Order Number PB92-963208CDH, price: PC A10/MF AOS
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, New York, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.

0240 National Priorities List Sites: New York, 1992

Order Number PB93-963231CDH, price: PC A11/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports

on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, New York, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.

0241 National Priorities List Sites: North and South
Dakota

Order Number PB91-921241CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 42p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, North Dakota, South Dakota, Superfund, Cleanup.

0242 National Priorities List Sites: North and South
Dakota, 1992

Order Number PB93-963233CDH, price; PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, North Dakota, South Dakota, Superfund, National
Priorities List, Cleanup.

0243 National Priorities List Sites: North Carolina

Order Number PB91-921240CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, North Carolina, Superfund, Cleanup.

0244 National Priorities List Sites: North Carolina

Order Number PB92-963209CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, North Carolina, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.

0245 National Priorities List Sites: North Carolina, 1992

Order Number PB93-963232CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, North Carolina, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.

0246 National Priorities List Sites: North Dakota and
South Dakota

Order Number PB92-963236CDH. price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special

Reports

problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, North Dakota, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.

0247 National Priorities List Sites: Ohio

Order Number PB91-921242CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site, The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 100p.

Subject index keywords; Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Ohio, Superfund, Cleanup.

0248 National Priorities List Sites: Ohio

Order Number PB92-963246CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Ohio, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.

0249 National Priorities List Sites: Ohio, 1992

Order Number PB93-963234CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-

lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Ohio, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.

0250 National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma

Order Number PB91-921243CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead In solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 51 p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Oklahoma, Superfund, Cleanup.

0251 National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma

Order Number PB92-963221CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others S400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921243. 61 p.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Oklahoma, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.

0252 National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma, 1992
Order Number PB93-963235CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92

The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Oklahoma, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.

0253 National Priorities List Sites: Oregon

Order Number PB91-921244CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; ail others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 46p.

Subject index keywords; Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Oregon, Superfund, Cleanup.

0254 National Priorities List Sites: Oregon

Order Number PB92-963245CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Oregon, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.

0255 National Priorities List Sites: Oregon, 1992

Order Number PB93-963236CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups

are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Oregon, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.

0256 National Priorities List Sites: Pennsylvania

Order Number PB91-921245CDH, price: PC A11/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400), Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 245p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Pennsylvania, Superfund, Cleanup.

025? National Priorities List Sites: Pennsylvania

Order Number PB92-963240CDH, price: PC A11/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

0258 National Priorities List Sites; Pennsylvania, 1992

Order Number PB93-963237CDH, price: PC A12/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT; Special

Reports

paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250. 272p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Pennsylvania, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.

0259 National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico

Order Number PB91-921257CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 47p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Puerto Rico, Superfund, Cleanup.

0260 National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico

Order Number PB92-963207CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Puerto Rico, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.

0261 National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico and Virgin
Islands, 1992

Order Number PB93-963238CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.

Specifications; Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,

and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites, PB93-963250, 57p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Superfund, National Pri-
orities List, Cleanup.

0262 National Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island

Order Number PB91-921248CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 54p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials. Pollution
control, Rhode Island, Superfund, Cleanup.

0263 National Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island

Order Number PB92-963230CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Rhode Island, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.

0264 National Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island, 1992

Order Number PB93-963239CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Rhode Island, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.

0265 National Priorities List Sites Set (1991)

Order Number PB92-963253CDH, price: PCS750.00
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 1991
The publications provide general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what
the problems are, what EPA and others participating in Site
Cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. (The overview document,
Superfund: Focusing on the Nation at Large (1991), available
separately order as PB92-953252).

Specifications: The overview document, Superfund: Focus-
ing on the Nation at Large (1991), available separately as
PB92-953252. Set includes PB92-963204 through PB92-
963251. See also PB91-238725. 4486p-in 49v.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Superfund, National Priorities List.

0266 National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina

Order Number PB91-921247CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 78p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, South Carolina, Superfund, Cleanup.

0267 National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina

Order Number PB92-963210CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in

paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921247. S7p.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, South Carolina, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.

0268 National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina, 1992

Order Number PB93-963240CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.

Subject Index keywords; Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, South Carolina, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.

0269 National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Tennessee, Superfund, Cleanup.

0270 National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee

Order Number PB92-963225CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special

Reports

Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921248. 69p.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Tennessee, Superfund. National Priorities List,
Cleanup.

0271 National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee, 1992

Order Number PB93-963241CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Tennessee, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.

0272 National Priorities List Sites: Texas

Order Number PB91-921249CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 92p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials. Pollution
control, Texas, Superfund, Cleanup.

0273 National Priorities List Sites: Texas

Order Number PB92-963212CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Texas, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.

0274 National Priorities List Sites: Texas, 1992

Order Number PB93-963242CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Texas, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.

0275 National Priorities List Sites: The United States
Territories, 1992

Order Number PB93-963203CDH, price; PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, American Samoa, Guam, Trust territories, Superfund,
National Priorities List, Cleanup.

0276 National Priorities List Sites: Utah

Order Number PB91-921250CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; alt others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 54p.

Subject index keywords; Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Utah, Superfund, Cleanup.

0277 National Priorities List Sites: Utah

Order Number PB92-963215CDH, price; PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPl) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Utah, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.

0278 National Priorities List Sites: Utah, 1992

Order Number PB93-963243CDH, price; PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Utah, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.

0279 National Priorities List Sites: Vermont

Order Number PB91-921251CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada

and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 45p,

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Vermont, Superfund, Cleanup.

0280 National Priorities List Sites: Vermont

Order Number PB92-963231CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91

Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Vermont, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.

0261 National Priorities Ust Sites: Vermont, 1992

Order Number PB93-963244CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Vermont, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.

0282 National Priorities List Sites: Virginia

Order Number PB91-921252CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special

Reports

and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 75p.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Virginia, Superfund, Cleanup.

0283 National Priorities List Sites: Virginia

Order Number PB92-963217CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

Specifications: Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; alt others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921252. 83p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Virginia, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.

0284 National Priorities List Sites: Virginia, 1992

Order Number PB93-063245CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Virginia, Superfund, National Priorities List, Cleanup.

0285 National Priorities List Sites: Washington

Order Number PB91-921253CDH, price; PC A07/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 130p.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Washington(State), Superfund, Cleanup.

0286 National Priorities List Sites: Washington

Order Number PB92-963244CDH, price; PC A07/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) ate. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating In site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Washington(State), Superfund, National Priorities
List, Cleanup.

0287 National Priorities List Sites: Washington, 1992

Order Number PB93-963246CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Washington(State), Superfund, National Priorities
List, Cleanup,

0288 National Priorities List Sites: West Virginia

Order Number PB91-921254CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports

and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 39p.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, West Virginia, Superfund, Cleanup.

0289 National Priorities List Sites: West Virginia

Order Number PB92-963229CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, West Virginia, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.

0290 National Priorities List Sites: West Virginia, 1992

Order Number PB93-963247CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, West Virginia, Superfund, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.

0291 National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin

Order Number PB91-921255CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada

and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 117p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Wisconsin, Superfund, Cleanup.

0292 National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin

Order Number PB92-963243CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Wisconsin, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.

0293 National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin, 1992

Order Number PB93-963248CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background in-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Wisconsin, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.

0294 National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming

Order Number PB91-921256CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Together with the companion National Overview volume this
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The document is intended to clearly
describe what the problems are, what EPA and others par-
ticipating in site cleanups are doing, and how the Nation can
move ahead in solving these serious problems. The State
volume compiles site summary fact sheets on each State
site being cleaned up under the Superfund program.

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special

Reports

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 35p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Wyoming, Superfund, Cleanup.

0295 National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming

Order Number PB92-963238CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Together with the companion national overview volume the
publication provides general Superfund background informa-
tion and descriptions of activities at each State National Pri-
orities List (NPL) site. The report clearly describes what the
problems are, what EPA and others participating in site
cleanups are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in
solving these serious problems. Also included are sites sum-
mary fact sheets on each State site being cleaned up under
the Superfund program.

Specifications; Available on Standing Order, deposit ac-
count required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada, and
Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Also available as a package con-
taining 49 NPL Sites Volumes and 1 National Overview
Volume, PB92-963253. See also PB91-921256. 47p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Wyoming, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.

0296 National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming, 1992

Order Number PB93-963249CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The publication provides general Superfund background In-
formation and descriptions of activities at each State Nation-
al Priorities List (NPL) site. It clearly describes what the prob-
lems are, what EPA and others participating in site cleanups
are doing, and how the nation can move ahead in solving
these serious problems. Compiles site summary fact sheets
on each State site being cleaned up under the Superfund
Program.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Wyoming, Superfund, National Priorities List, Clean-
up.

0297 National Priorities List Sites (1992)

Order Number PB93-963250CDH, price: PC$700.00
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1992
Specifications: Package includes 49 NPL Sites, PB93-
963201 through PB93-963249. 4835p-in 49v.

0298 National Superfund Program Priorities, Fiscal Year
1994

Order Number PB94-963221CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 31 Jan 94
The memorandum provides the FY 1994 National Superfund
Program Priorities for Regions and Headquarters. There are
nine major Superfund priorities: Accelerated Cleanup and
Emergency Response; Enforcement First; Enforcement Fair-
ness; Military Base Closure; NPL Construction Completions;
Contracts Management; Environmental Justice and Meaning-
ful Community Involvement; Enhancement of State Role and
Development of Deferral Options; and Innovative Technol-
ogies.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required {minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 3p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management,

0299 Progress Toward Implementing Superfund. Fiscal
Year 1988

Order Number PB90-249442CDH, price: PC A21/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 90
The EPA's Annual Report includes the progress made by the
Agency during Fiscal Year 1988 in implements CERCLA (or
Superfund), as amended by the Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986, The report provides an
overall perspective on progress in 1988, and, in addition,
also contains information that Congress specifically request-
ed, including a detailed description of each of the 152
Records of Decision (RODs) that were signed in fiscal year
1988; a report on the status of remedial actions, including
enforcement activity, in progress at the end of the fiscal
year; and an evaluation of newly developed feasible and
achievable permanent treatment technologies.
Specifications: See also PB89-233548. 479p.

Subject index keywords: National government, Hazardous
materials, Waste disposal, Pollution control, Superfund.

0300 Progress Toward Implementing Superfund. Fiscal
Year 1989

Order Number PB91-921204CDH, price: PC A16/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 90
The EPA's Annual Report includes the progress made by the
Agency in implementing the national hazardous waste law
and its amendments (CERCLA and SARA). The reports pro-
vide an overall perspective on progress, contain information
that Congress specifically requested, and an evaluation of
newly developed feasible and achieveable permanent treat-
ment technologies.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $100 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $200). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Supersedes PB91-921201. See
also PB90-249442. 369p.

Subject index keywords: National government, Hazardous
materials, Waste disposal, Pollution control, Superfund.

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports

0301 Progress Toward Implementing Superfund, Fiscal
Year 1990: A Report to the Congress

Order Number PB92-963256CDH, price: PC E05/MF A04
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 92
Section 301(h) of the Comprehensive Environmental Re-
sponse, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA, or Super-
fund), as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Re-
authorization Act (SARA) of 1988, requires the Agency to
report annually on response activities and accomplishments,
and to compare remedial and enforcement projects with
those undertaken in previous fiscal years. The Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), at the end of fiscal year 1990
(FY90), was well on its way toward intensifying the Super-
fund program. Its accomplishments indicate the Agency's ac-
celerated success in implementing the Superfund program.
The Agency aggressively seeks potentially responsible party
(PRP) involvement at every site where PRPs are identified.
The Report contains information Congress specifically re-
quested in Section 301(h)(1), including an abstract of each
Record of Decision (ROD) that was signed in FY90; a report
on the status of remedial actions, including enforcement ac-
tivity in progress at the end of the fiscal year; and an evalua-
tion of newly developed feasible and achievable treatment
technologies; and a description of minority firm participation
in Superfund contracts and efforts to encourage such partici-
pation.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; ali others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 400p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Pollution regulations.

0302 Progress Toward Implementing Superfund, Fiscal
Year 1991, Report to Congress

Order Number PB94-963234CDH, price: PC A22/MF A04
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 94
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) continued its
progress in protecting public health, welfare, and the environ-
ment through the Superfund program in fiscal year 1991
(FY91). As it completed the eleventh year of the program,
the Agency reported clean-up work progress or completion
at 93 percent of the 1,207 sites on the National Priorities
List. The FY91 accomplishments reflect activities initiated by
the 30-Day Task Force and continued success in implement-
ing A Management Review of the Superfund Program (the
FY89 90-Day Study) (PB90-153883).

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management.

0303 RCRA, Superfund Monthly Hot Line Reports

Order Number PB92-922400CDH, price; Subscription, call for
price

Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste; 1992

The RCRA/SF Hotline quickly responds to questions related
to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), the
comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and

Liability Act (CERCLA), Underground Storage Tanks (UST)
program, the Superfund Amendments Reauthorization Act
(SARA), and the Chemical emergency Preparedness (CEPP)
Community Right-to-know Act/Title III program. The hotline is
the mechanism for EPA's response to inquiries from the
public and regulated community; the referral point for docu-
ment availability; the dissemination of changing information;
and the primary means for answering factual questions on
EPA regulations and policies. The Monthly Hotline Reports
contain questions posed by the callers that were either sig-
nificant and required the EPA to resolve the issues or were
the most frequently asked questions. Also included in the
Reports are the Federal Register summaries, publications
availabilities, and call statistics.

Specifications: Available on subscription, U.S., Canada, and
Mexico price $96.00; price for others $192.00. Also available
individually. Back year sets and indexes are available to
1982. 12 issues.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Government
policies, Law(Jurisprudence), Pollution abatement, Periodi-
cals, Superfund.

0304 SARA (Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization
Act) Section 313 Roadmaps Data Base. User's Manual.
Version 2.10

Order Number PB90-174855CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
ICF, Inc., Fairfax, VA.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, DC. Office of Toxic Substances; 14 Jul 89
EPA has developed a database of sources of information on
the chemicals listed in section 313 of the Superfund Amend-
ments and Reauthorization Act (SARA). The database is in-
tended to assist users of section 313 Toxic Release Invento-
ry data to perform exposure and risk assessments of these
chemicals. The Roadmaps system displays and/or prints in-
formation for the SARA section 313 chemicals on health and
environmental effects, Federal regulation, and state air and
water regulations, monitoring data, and state contacts.
Specifications: For system on diskettes, see PB90-501487.
See also PB90-501479. Sponsored by Environmental Protec-
tion Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Toxic Substances.
87p.

Subject index keywords: Exposure, Risk, Toxic substances.

0305 Smart Moves in Superfund - Regional initiatives.
Volume 1, Number 1, February 1992

Order Number PB92-983272CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 92
The bulletin serves as an exchange for Regional information
in Superfund. The issue has the following contents: region 6
to cut time between NPL listing and design; region 4 encour-
ages PRPs to start remedial designs before consent decree;
region 3 eliminates statement of work; suggestion box; revi-
talization team meets on potential pilots; and voice of the re-
gions.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special

Reports

0306 Smart Moves in Superfund - Regional Pilots and
Initiatives. Volume 1, Number 2, September 1992

Order Number PB93-963283CDH, price: PC AQ1/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 92
The issue of the Smart Moves in Superfund bulletin series
highlights regional pilots and initiatives to streamline cleanup
through the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Mode).
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 4p.

Subject index keywords: Waste management, Superfund,
Hazardous materials, Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model.

0307 Smart Moves in Superfund - Revitalization One Year
Later. Volume 1, Number 3, January 1993

Order Number PB93-9632B4CDH, price: PC AG1/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Jan 93
The issue of the Smart Moves in Superfund bulletin series
provides an update on the revitalization effort, highlighting
National Priorities List (NPL) construction completions, accel-
erating cleanup, the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model,
risk assessment/risk management, contracts management,
enforcement policy/equity, interagency cooperation, public
forms, and state meetings.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0308 Some Major Factors Important in Establishing Land
Use Policy for Remediated Superfund Sites

Order Number PB90-256686CDH, price; PC A04/MF A01
Georgia Univ., Athens.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, DC. Office of Cooperative Environmental
Management; Dec 89

The report is part of the National Network for Environmental
Management Studies under the auspices of the Office of Co-
operative Environmental Management of the U.S. Environ-
mental Protection Agency. No explicit federal policy address-
es future land use of remediated Superfund sites. The EPA
has no official land use policy for these sites and most states
have no mechanisms for identifying uncontrolled hazardous
waste sites, and no policies or procedures for guiding rede-
velopment of remediated sites. Historically, land use deci-
sions have been made by local governments. However, local
governments are subject to political pressures which impact
land use decisions, and may override environmental and
health concerns. Thus, federal and state participation is vital
in devising land use controls. In the absence of formal policy,
a variety of factors impact land use decisions. Four general
concerns are scientific uncertainty and technological limita-
tions, cleanup standards and risk assessment, institutional
controls, and liability for remediation costs. The report con-
cludes that the principal goal of land use policy should be to
allow the most effective allocation and utilization of available
resources to meet the legislative purpose of health and envi-
ronmental protection. Various possible land use policy objec-
tives are proposed.

Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Cooperative Environmen-
tal Management. 54p.

Subject index keywords: Land use, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Law(Jurisprudence), Superfund, Remedial
action.

0309 Status of Regional Superfund Pilots: End-of-Year
Report

Order Number PB94-963216CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 93
In 1991 and 1992, the Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response (OSWER) began major efforts to streamline and
accelerate Superfund response activities. In a statement on
October 2, 1991, the USEPA Administrator approved the Su-
perfund 30-Day Task Force Implementation Plan (October 1,
1991) which identified aggressive cleanup targets and strate-
gies for streamlining and 'revitalizing* the Superfund process.
Following this Introduction, Part II of the report contains an
index of pilot activities and key contacts; Part III provides ab-
stracts on each pilot; and Part IV describes in detail the
goals of each pilot, its status, evaluation plan, and results to
date.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials.

0310 Superfund Administrative Improvements. Executive
Summary

Order Number PB93-963294CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 23 Jun 93
The report focuses on administrative improvements to the
Superfund program suggested by the Superfund Administra-
tive Improvements Task Force. Specific topics include en-
hancing enforcement fairness and reducing transaction
costs; enhancing cleanup effectiveness and consistency; en-
hancing meaningful public involvement; and enhancing the
state role in the Superfund program.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $450). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB93-963295. 19p,
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal.

0311 Superfund Administrative Improvements. Final
Report

Order Number PB93-963295CDH. price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 23 Jun 93
The report focuses on administrative improvements to the
Superfund program suggested by the Superfund Administra-
tive Improvements Task Force. Specific topics include en-
hancing enforcement fairness and reducing transaction
costs; enhancing cleanup effectiveness and consistency; en-
hancing meaningful public involvement; and enhancing the
state role in the Superfund program.

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $450). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB93-963294. 54p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials.

0312 Superfund Administrative Improvements:

Reinventing Superfund

Order Number PB94-963210CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Nov 93
The Superfund Administrative Improvements initiatives are a
comprehensive package of administrative changes designed
to make significant improvements to the Superfund program
prior to Superfund reauthorization. Announced in June 1993,
these Initiatives have had an immediate impact on improving
the pace, cost and fairness of Superfund. The fact sheet de-
scribes the themes, background and each initiative of the
Administrative Improvements effort. The fact sheet also de-
scribes major activities which have been completed during
the first three months of implementation, as well as those
that are currently underway and planned to be completed
over the next 12 months.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Pollution regulations,
Administrative procedures.

0313 Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally-Funded Removals. Fifth Annual
Report - Fiscal Year 1990

Order Number PB92-963403CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 91
The Superfund removal program has achieved significant ac-
complishments in responding to environmental emergencies,
cleaning up hazardous waste sites, and making sites safe.
For this reason, EPA publishes the Superfund Emergency
Response Actions summary, which provides the public with
valuable information about Superfund removal actions under-
taken by EPA. This document is updated annually. The Fifth
Annual Report, which is the fourth update to the initial docu-
ment, summarizes the Superfund removal actions completed
by EPA between October 1989 and September 1990.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available In
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB90-921260. 159p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Emergency planning, Remedial action, Waste management,
Emergency Response Program, Remedial response,

0314 Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally Funded Removals. Fourth Annual
Report - Fiscal Year 1989

Order Number PB91-921260CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Summarizes short-term actions (removals) undertaken by
EPA and the U.S. Coast Guard in response to hazardous
substance incidents. The documents present an historical

perspective of the program and summarize removal actions
taken.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Emergency planning,
Hazardous materials, Waste management, Remedial re-
sponse.

0315 Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally-Funded Removals. Sixth Annual
Report, Fiscal Year 1991

Order Number PB92-963421CDH, price: PC A09/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 92
The Superfund removal program has achieved significant ac-
complishments in responding to environmental emergencies,
cleaning up hazardous waste sites, and making sites safe.
For this reason, EPA publishes the Superfund Emergency
Response Actions summary, which provides the public with
valuable information about Superfund removal actions under-
taken by EPA. This document is updated annually. The Sixth
Annual Report, which is the fifth update to the initial docu-
ment, summarizes the Superfund removal actions completed
by EPA between October 1990 and September 1991.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB92-963403. 192p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Emergency planning,
Public information, Hazardous materials, Waste management,
Remedial action.

0316 Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally-Funded Removals. Volume 1

Order Number PB90-197310CDH. price: PC A10/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 87
The document is a summary of short-term actions (removals)
undertaken by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and
the U.S. Coast Guard in response to hazardous substance
incidents. The document presents a historical perspective of
the program, summarizing short-term actions completed
during the five-year authorized funding period of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act (CERCLA), December 11, 1980, through September
30, 1985 and those actions taken during October 1, 1985
through September 30, 1986 that were funded primarily by
two special appropriations from Congress. The Superfund
Emergency Response Actions summary is the first document
to be published aggregating short-term response information
for all six years. As the Superfund removal program contin-
ues, EPA intends to publish annual updates of the document.
Specifications: See also Volume 2, PB90-197328. 196p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, History, Removal, Superfund program, Remedial ac-
tions.

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special

Reports

0317 Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally-Funded Removals. Volume 2

Order Number PB90-197328CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jun 88
Serves as the second annual report for public use on short-
term removal actions undertaken by EPA between October
1986 and June 1988.

Specifications; See also Volume 1, PB90-197310. 11 Op.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, History, Removal, Superfund program, Remedial ac-
tions.

0318 Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally Funded Removals, Volume 3

Order Number PB90-214354CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Jun 89
Volume III summarizes short-term removal activities complet-
ed during the eighth year of the Superfund program. The
document is presented as a series of matrices that are orga-
nized numerically by Region and alphabetically by State and
site name within each Region. It contains the same types of
information included in Volume I and II. EPA intends to con-
tinue providing the information in future updates, inquiries re-
garding information contained in the document should be re-
ferred to the appropriate EPA Regional office. A list of EPA
contacts and a map delineating the States within each
Region are provided in the report. In addition, the document
includes a listing of sites found in Volumes I and II. These
sites are listed alphabetically by State within their respective
Regions. In the back of the report, there is also an alphabeti-
cal index of all sites in Volumes I, II, and III.

Specifications: See also PB90-197310, 125p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Site sur-
veys, Waste disposal, Superfund program, Remedial action,
Emergency plans, Cleanup operations, Land pollution con-
trol, Waste management.

0319 Superfund: EPA/ICMA Superfund Revitalization
Conference. Held in Chicago, Illinois on November 12-13,
1992

Order Number PB93-963274CDH, price; PC AQ4/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Apr 93
The summary report outlines the comments made by the in-
troductory speakers as well as the conclusions drawn from
the group discussions. The report highlights those recom-
mendations that were strongly endorsed by a large number
of attendees. The report also identifies points on which the
different groups could not reach consensus.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Meetings.

0320 Superfund: EPA/ICMA Superfund Revitalization
Conference. Held in San Francisco, California on
February 1-2, 1993

Order Number PB94-963202CDH, price; PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Oct 93
The report summarizes comments from the regional confer-
ence held in San Francisco in February 1993 on improving
the Superfund program.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Meetings.

0321 SUPERFUND: Focusing on the Nation at Large. A
Decade of Progress at National Priorities List Sites

Order Number PB91-921202CDH, price: Standing Order, call
for price

Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 90
The National volume of the public document series provides
a progress report on the cleanup of Superfund sites, site-by-
site. The document explains the progress and the challenges
facing the nations. The publication describes sites that are
deemed to be of national priority and provides information on
their cleanup progress, in addition to this volume, there will
be state-specific volumes available during early 1991.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $100 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $200). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. I02p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Pollution control, Superfund, Cleanup,

0322 Superfund: Focusing on the Nation at Large. A
Decade of Progress at National Priorities List Sites

Order Number PB91-921207CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
The publication summarizes the progress made in hazardous
site clean-up of sites on the National Priorities List (NPL). It
also provides a state-by-state summary of 422 improved
sites. 'Superfund: Focusing on the Nation at Large' is supple-
mented by individual State books which contain detailed in-
formation on all 1,236 NPL sites.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Singfe copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Supersedes PB91-921202. See
also PB91-921209 through PB91-921258. 103p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Remedial action, Pollution control, National Priorities List,
Cleanup.

0323 Superfund: Focusing on the Nation at Large. 1991
Update

Order Number PB92-963252CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
The report summarizes the progress made in the cleanup of
sites on the National Priorities List (NPL). It also provides a

-------
ADMINISTRATIVE & MANAGEMENT: Special Reports

state-by-state summary of 422 improved sites. Supplemented
by the individual State books which contain detailed informa-
tion on all 1245 sites.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Superfund, National Priorities List.

0324 Superfund Policy Forum Update, Volume 1, Number
1, February 1992

Order Number PB92-963262CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 92
The purpose of the bulletin is to keep all Superfund staff
members knowledgeable and informed about reauthorization
issues and events through periodic newsletter updates.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.

Subject index keywords: Government policies, Hazardous
materials, Project management, Meetings, Superfund, Com-
prehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Li-
abilities Act(CERCLA), Reauthorization issues.

0325 Superfund Progress - Aficionado's Version:

Progress as of June 30,1992

Order Number PB92-963278CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 30 Jun 92
The quarterly Superfund Progress reports on the strides the
Superfund program is making towards protecting people and
the environment from the hazards of uncontrolled chemical
releases. The Aficionado's Version of Superfund Progress
provides more detailed statistical information. The Summer
1992 Superfund Progress highlights the Environmental Re-
sponse Team, the Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model,
and the Superfund Progress Report - making polluters pay
for cleanup.

Subject index keywords: Protection, Hazardous materials.

0326 Superfund Progress - Aficionado's Version
{Progress as of March 31, 1992)

Order Number PB92-963267CDH, price; PC AQ3/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jun 92
Superfund is the United States program for cleaning up un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. Established by the Com-
prehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Li-
ability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, EPA records in its CERCLIS
database every hazardous waste site considered for a Su-
perfund cleanup and every site where a removal action is
performed. The system tracks the identification, evaluation,
and, if necessary, cleanup of hazardous waste sites. The Re-
medial Project managers in each EPA Region, who oversee
cleanup efforts, add information about the sites they manage

to CERCLIS. Currently, there are 35,984 sites in CERCLIS.
The Superfund Site Tally includes the current status of each
CERCLIS site.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Pollution control, Project management, Superfund,
Comprehensive Environmental Response.

0327 Superfund Progress. Aficionado's Version. Progress
as of September 30,1992

Order Number PB93-963255CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 93
The issue of Superfund Progress Aficionado's Version pro-
vides facts and figures as of September 30, 1992, for NPL
site distribution, emergency removals, preliminary assess-
ments/site inspections/the NPL, remedial investigations/fea-
sibility studies/RODs, remedial action, and enforcement.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. I5p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0328 Superfund Progress: Fall/Winter 1992

Order Number PB93-963254CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 93
The issue of Superfund Progress provides information on Su-
perfund training programs, promoting local involvement in
Superfund, and a Superfund 1992 progress report.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 17p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Training devices,
Waste management, Hazardous materials, Personnel devel-
opment.

0329 Superfund Progress, Spring 1992

Order Number PB92-963265CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 92
The report describes the Superfund removal program. The
duties of the on-scene coordinators who work at Emergency
spills are described. Case studies at different sites are in-
cluded and the progress made.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Project management, Superfund.

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Assessment &

Listing

0330 Superfund Progress, Summer 1992

Order Number PB92-963279CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 92
The quarterly Superfund Progress report reports on the
strides the Superfund program is making towards protecting
people and the environment from the hazards of uncon-
trolled chemical releases. It portrays facets of the program
that often go unnoticed or unpublicized, reports new devel-
opments, and provides figures to show what the program has
accomplished. The Summer 1992 Superfund Progress in-
cludes a focus on the Environmental Response Team, the
Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model, and the Superfund
Progress Report - Making Polluters Pay for Cleanup.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 15p.

Subject index keywords: Protection, Hazardous materials,
Superfund.

0331 Superfund Reauthorization: NACiPT Subcommittee
Handbook

Order Number PB93-963298CDH, price: PC A05/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 18 Jun 93
The handbook for the NACEPT Subcommittee on Superfund
reauthorization includes overview of Superfund regulatory
framework, program status, background materials from meet-
ings prior to June 1993, and a selection of critical analyses
of Superfund.

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Pollution regulations,
Handbooks.

0332 Superfund Reform Act of 1994

Order Number PB94-963239CDH, price: PC A10/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 94
The legislation which would amend the Comprehensive Envi-
ronmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of
1980 (CERCLA), was developed through a lengthy process
that capitalized on the expertise of the many Superfund
stakeholders - both inside and outside of government.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 222p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Legislation.

0333 Superfund: Report of the EPA Superfund
Revitalization Public Meeting Held on June 24,1992.
Volumes 1 and 2

Order Number PB92-963288CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 92
On June 24, 1992, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
and its Superfund Revitalization Office helda meeting to en-
courage public participation in identifying innovative, non-tra-
ditional approaches to expedite the Superfund cleanup proc-

ess. The agenda was structured to focus on four particular
topic areas: ways to speed up the Superfund cleanup pro-
gram; ways to encourage and manage voluntary cleanups by
potentially responsible parties; effective ways to involve the
state, the community, and other interested parties in the
entire Superfund cleanup process; and ways to realistically
describe the expectations of the Superfund program, meas-
ure its success in achieving the program's goals, and com-
municate these goals and successes to interested parties.
The report, organized along the lines of the topics outlined
above, documents suggestions that were made by attendees
at the meeting, as well as written comments that were pre-
pared specifically to address the issues discussed at the
meeting. The report also provides a summary of EPA follow-
up actions currently under consideration.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Meetings, Citizen par-
ticipation, Remedial action, Waste management, Cleanup op-
erations.

0334 Superfund Revitalization: Measures of Success

Order Number PB94-963217CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 7 Jan 94

Table of Contents: Introduction; Valuing Superfund Cleanup;
Accelerating Superfund Response; Communication Initiatives;
and Contract Management.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials.

PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Assessment & Listing

0335 Amendment to Historical Definitions of NPL
Deletion Start and Completion Dates

Order Number PB93-963278CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 8 Oct 92
The memorandum amends two historical CERCLIS (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability
Information System) definitions of the NPL (National Priorities
List) deletion process start and completion dates in the Su-
perfund Comprehensive Accomplishments Plan (SCAP)
Manual of FY 1987 and the Superfund Program Management
Manual of FY 1988.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Superfund Comprehensive Accomplish-
ments Plan, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Re-
sponse.

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Assessment & Listing

0336 Clarification of Delegation to Approve Consistency
Exemptions at NPL Sites

Order Number PB93-963281CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 3 Jun 92
The directive clarifies Regional authority to approve exemp-
tions from the $2 million statutory limit on Superfund removal
actions.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0337 Closing the NPL Book under the Original HRS

Order Number PB91-921302CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 90
The Fact Sheet discusses the closing of the Old NPL under
the original HRS. Since 1982, the U.S. Environmental Protec-
tion Agency (EPA) has been preparing the National Priorities
List (NPL). The list informs the public of uncontrolled hazard-
ous waste sites that warrant further investigation to deter-
mine if they pose risks to public health or the environment.
Such sites are eligible for long-term 'remedial action' fi-
nanced under the Trust Fund established by the Comprehen-
sive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reau-
thorization Act of 1986 (SARA). Sites are placed on the NPL
primarily on the basis of their scores under EPA's Hazard
Ranking System (HRS) model developed in 1982. EPA has
now revised the HRS in response to SARA. The revised
HRS, which will become effective late in February 1991, 90
days after its publication in the Federal Register, is a more
comprehensive and accurate scoring system than the origi-
nal HRS and will add new types of sites to the NPL.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 5p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, National Priorities List, Hazard Ranking System.

0338 Compendium of NPL Listing Policies and
Procedures, 1982 to 1985

Order Number PB91-921281CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 91
The compendium is a collection of NPL listing policy and pro-
cedure directives issued from 1982 to 1985. The contents in-
clude: Guidance for Establishing the National Priorities List,
February 1982 (9320.1-01); Guidance for Establishing the
National Priorities List, June 1982 (9320.1-02); Guidance for
Proposed NPL Update No. 3, February 1984 (9320.3-04);
Guidance for Updating the National Priorities List, May 1983
(9320.3-01); Instructions for Promulgating the National Prior-
ities List Update, January 1984 (9320.3-02); National Prior-
ities List Categorization, July 1984 (9320.1-04); NPL Informa-
tion Update - Update No. 4, April 1985 (9320.3-05); Proce-
dures for Updating the National Priorities List, May 1984,
(9320.3-03); Promulgation of the National Priorities List, May

1983 (9320.1-03); RCRA/NPL Listing Policy, September
1986 (9320.1-05); and Updating the National Priorities List:
Update No. 6 Proposal, September 1985 (9320.3-06).
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 74p,

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund.

0339 Discussions with the Public Concerning NPL
Listings

Order Number PB93-963338CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 30 Apr 93
The memorandum briefly outlines EPA's policy on site-relat-
ed discussions prior to and during rulemaking concerning the
listing of sites on the National Priorities List. Recently some
Regions, as well as several members of Congress, have
raised the question of what types of site-related discussions
are permissible between EPA personnel and the public (e.g.,
potentially responsible parties (PRPs) or commenters) prior
to and during the listing process.

Subject Index keywords: Waste management, Government
policies, Hazardous materials, Directives, National Priorities
List, Potentially responsible parties(PRPs).

0340 FACT BOOK: National Priorities List under the
Original Hazard Ranking System, 1981-1991

Order Number PB93-963350CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Oct 93
The report provides an overview of the NPL listing process
and historical data summaries on the NPL from 1981-1991.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 78p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Listings, National Pri-
orities List.

0341 Guidance for Environmental Priorities Initiative (EPI)
Facilities in the Superfund Pre-Remedial Program

Order Number PB91 -139980CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 31 Jan 89
The directive provides guidance to the Regions and States
on handling Environmental Priorities Initiative facilities by the
Superfund pre-remedial program. The directive supplements
directive no. 9932.0 'Method for Prioritizing CERCLA Prelimi-
nary Assessments at RCRA Facilities,' dated May 31, 1988.
Specifications: See also PB91-139972, 10p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, Envi-
ronmental priorities initiatives,

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Assessment &

Listing

0342 Guidance for Performing Preliminary Assessments
under CERCLA

Order Number PB92-963303CDH, price: PC A13/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
The purpose of the guidance is to provide instructions for
conducting a PA and reporting results. The guidance dis-
cusses the information required to evaluate a site and how to
obtain it, how to score a site, and reporting requirements.
The document also provides guidelines and instruction on PA
evaluation, scoring, and the use of standard PA scoresheets.
The overall goal of the guidance is to assist PA investigators
in conducting high-quality assessments that result in correct
site screening or further action recommendations on a na-
tionally consistent basis.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Supersedes PB90-183054. 277p.
Subject index keywords: Assessments, Hazardous materi-
als, Sites, Superfund.

0343 Guidance for Performing Site Inspections under
CERCLA

Order Number PB92-963375CDH, price: PC A11/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 92
The guidance presents EPA's site inspection strategy. The
strategy discusses procedural guidelines to Investigate po-
tential Superfund (CERCLA) sites for evaluation pursuant to
the Hazard Ranking System (HRS), revised in accordance
with the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of
1986. The HRS is the primary means by which EPA evalu-
ates sites for Superfund's National Priorities List (NPL).
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; ail others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 244p.

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Inspection, Site sur-
veys, Waste management, Hazardous materials.

0344 Guidance on Setting Priorities for NPL Candidate
Sites

Order Number PB93-963333CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 28 Oct 92
The guidance document identifies factors that will help EPA
regions decide the order in which they should consider sites
with completed site inspections for inclusion on the NPL (Na-
tional Priorities List).

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Inspection, Site sur-
veys, National Priorities List.

0345 Guide to Management of Investigation-Derived
Wastes

Order Number PB92-963353CDH, price: PC A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 92
The fact sheet presents an overview of possible investiga-
tion-derived waste management options, discusses the pro-

tectiveness requirements and ARARs associated with these
options, and outlines general objectives established for IDW
management under Superfund.

Subject index keywords; Waste management, Pollution
regulations, Inspection, Superfund, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response.

0346 Hazard Ranking System Guidance Manual

Order Number PB92-963377CDH, price: PC A22/MF A04
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 92
The Hazard Ranking System Guidance Manual provides gen-
eral and technical guidance for individuals involved in deter-
mining Hazard Ranking System (HRS) scores and preparing
HRS scoring packages. The manual clarifies terms arid con-
cepts in the HRS, presents strategies and specific guidance
for scoring selected HRS factors, and provides guidelines to
assist in collecting and organizing relevant data.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 524p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Manuals, Hazard Ranking System,
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

0347 Hazard Ranking System Guidance Manual

Order Number PB93-963356CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
The Hazard Ranking System (HRS) is the scoring method
EPA uses to assess the relative threat associated with the
release or potential release of hazardous substances from a
waste site. The HRS is the primary mechanism used by EPA
to determine which sites should be placed on the National
Priorities List. The manual is targeted primarily to HRS scor-
ers and HRS package preparers, who frequently are govern-
ment contractors or State agency staff. Inexperienced scor-
ers should find it especially helpful as a reference while they
'learn' the HRS. Others involved in EPA's site assessment
process (e.g., HRS package reviewers) should also find parts
of the manual useful.

0348 Identification of a Senior Superfund Official lor
Addressing Special NPL Site-Related Issues

Order Number PB93-963279CDH, price: PC A01 /MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 22 May 92
The directive identifies a senior Superfund official responsible
for reviewing and addressing specific issues at NPL (National
Priorities List) sites that cannot be resolved at the Regional
level and identifies criteria for NPL site referrals to this offi-
cial.

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Assessment & Listing

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0349 Management of Investigation-Derived Wastes during
Site Inspections

Order Number PB91-921331CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 91
The guidance presents a general regulatory background and
options for management of investigation-derived wastes
(IDW) generated during Superfund site inspections (Sis).
These wastes include soil cuttings, drilling muds, purged
ground water decontamination fluids (water and other fluids),
disposable sampling equipment (DE), and disposable person-
al protective equipment (PRE). The National Contingency
Plan (NCP) requires that management of IDW generated
during Sis compiles with all applicable or relevant and appro-
priate requirements (ARARS) to the extent practicable. In ad-
dition, other legal and practical consideration may affect the
handling of IDW. Therefore, site inspection managers and
other involved parties should be familiar with this guidance,
as well as the requirements of the NCP, ARARs, and EPA's
interpretation of these requirements.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Pollution regulations, Inspection, Site surveys, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response.

0350 Mining Sites on the National Priorities List: NPL Site
Summary Reports. Volume 1 (Aluminum Company of
America (Vancouver Smelter) to Cleveland Mill)

Order Number PB92-124767CDH, price: PCS98.00
Science Applications International Corp., Falls Church, VA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste; 21 Jun 91

Volume 1 of the Mining Sites on the National Priorities List
contains the following NPL Site Summary Reports: Aluminum
Company of America (Vouncouver Smelter), Anaconda
Smelter, Atlas Asbestos Mine, Bunker Hill Mining and Metal-
lurgical Complex, California Gulch, Carson River, Celtor
Chemical Works, Cherokee County/Galena Subsite, Cimar-
ron Mining Corp., Clear Creek/Central City, and Cleveland
Mill.

Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99,
PB92-124759. See also Volume 2, PB92-124775, Portions of
this document are not fully legible. Sponsored by Environ-
mental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Solid
Waste. 955p.

Subject index keywords; Mine wastes, Waste manage-
ment, Tailings, National Priorities List.

0351 Mining Sites on the National Priorities List: NPL Site
Summary Reports. Volume 2 (Commencement Bay
Nearshore/Tideflats to Kerr McGee) (Kress Creek, Reed-
Keppler Park, Residential Areas, Sewage Treatment
Plant)

Order Number PB92-124775CDH, price: PC$91.0G
Science Applications International Corp., Falls Church, VA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste; 21 Jun 91

Volume !! of the Mining Sites on the National Priorities List
contains the following NPL Site Summary Reports: Com-
mencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats, Denver Radium, Eagle
Mine East Helena Smelter, Eastern Michaud Flats Contami-
nation Area, Glen Ridge/Montclair/West Orange/US
Radium, Homestake Mill, Iron Mountain Mine, Johns-Manville
Coalinga Asbestos Mill, Kerr-McGee (Kress Creek, Reed-
Keppler Park, Residential Areas, Sewage Treatment Plant).
Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99,
PB92-124759. See also Volume 1, PB92-124767 and Volume

3, PB92-124783. Portions of this document are not fully legi-
ble. Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Wash-
ington, DC. Office of Solid Waste. 850p.

Subject index keywords: Mine wastes, Waste manage-
ment, Tailings, National Priorities List,

0352 Mining Sites on the National Priorities List: NPL Site
Summary Reports. Volume 3 (Kerr-McGee Chemical
Corp. (Soda Springs Rant) to Ormet Corp)

Order Number PB92-124783CDH, price: PCS96 00
Science Applications International Corp., Falls Church, VA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste; 21 Jun 91

Volume III of the Mining Sites on the National Priorities List
contains the following NPL Site Summary Reports: Kerr-
McGee Chemical Corp. (Soda Springs Plant), Lincoln Park,
Martin Marietta Reduction Facility, Midvale Slag (Valley Mate-
rials Slag), Milltown Reservoir Sediments, Monsanto Chemi-
cal Company, Monticello Mill Site, Monticello Vicinity Proper-
ties, Mouat Industries, and Ormet Corporation.
Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99,
PB92-124759. See also Volume 2, PB92-124775 and Volume

4, PB92-124791. Portions of this document are not fully legi-
ble. Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Wash-
ington, DC. Office of Solid Waste. 907p.

Subject index keywords: Mine wastes, Waste manage-
ment, Tailings, National Priorities List.

0353 Mining Sites on the National Priorities List: NPL Site
Summary Reports. Volume 4 (Oronogo-Duenweg Mining
Belt to Tar Creek)

Order Number PB92-124791CDH, price: PCS91.00
Science Applications International Corp., Falls Church, VA;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste; 21 Jun 91

Volume IV of the Mining Sites on the National Priorities List
contains the following NPL Site Summary Reports; Oronogo-
Deunweg Mining Belt, Palmerton Zinc, Sharon Steel/Mldvale
Tailings, Silver Bow Creek/Butte Area Site, Silver Mountain
Mine, Smuggler Mountain, St. Louis Airport/Hazelwood Inter-
im/Futura Coatings, Sulphur Bank Mercury Mine, and Tar
Creek.

Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99,
PB92-124759, See also Volume 3, PB92-124783 and Volume

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Assessment &

Listing

5, PB92-124809, Portions of this document are not fully legi-
ble. Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Wash-
ington, DC. Office of Solid Waste. 874p.

Subject index keywords: Mine wastes, Waste manage-
ment, Tailings, National Priorities List.

0354 Mining Sites on the National Priorities List: NPL Site
Summary Reports. Volume 5 (Teledyne Wah Chang to
Wayne Interim Storage Facility/W.R. Grace)

Order Number PB92-124809CDH, price; PC$77,00
Science Applications International Corp., Falls Church, VA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste; 21 Jun 91

Volume V of the Mining Sites on the National Priorities List
contains the following NPL site summary reports: Teledyne
Wah Chang, Tex-Tin Corp., Torch Lake, United Nuclear Cor-
poration/Churchrock Site, U.S. Tatanium, Uravan Uranium
Mill, Whitewood Creek, and Wayne Interim Storage Facility/
W. R. Grace.

Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99,
PB92-124759. See also Volume 4, PB92-124791. Portions of
this document are not fully legible. Sponsored by Environ-
mental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Solid
Waste. 615p.

Subject index keywords: Mine wastes, Waste manage-
ment, Tailings, National Priorities List.

0355 NPL Characterization Project: National Results

Order Number PB92-963304CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
The report is one in a series providing information on the
nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site as-
sessment program. It is intended to provide a 'snapshot' of
national sites on the NPL as of February 1991. Separate re-
ports are available for the ten individual EPA Regions.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (Minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 138p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, United States, Superfund, National Priorities List, US
EPA Region 1-10.

0356 NPL Characterization Project: Region 1 Results

Order Number PB92-963305CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
The report is one in a series providing information on the
nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site as-
sessment program. It is intended to provide a 'snapshot* of
sites in Region 1 on the NPL as of February 1991. Separate
reports are available for the other nine EPA Regions and for
the nation as a whole.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Superfund, National Priorities List, US EPA Region 1.

0357 NPL Characterization Project: Region 3 Results

Order Number PB92-963307CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
The report is one in a series providing information on the
nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site as-
sessment program. It is intended to provide a 'snapshot' of
sites in Region 3 on the NPL as of February 1991. Separate
reports are available for the other nine EPA Regions and for
the nation as a whole.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Superfund, National Priorities List, US EPA Region 3.

0358 NPL Characterization Project: Region 4 Results

Order Number PB92-963308CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
The report is one in a series providing information on the
nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site as-
sessment program. It is intended to provide a 'snapshot' of
sites in Region 4 on the NPL as of February 1991. Separate
reports are available for the other nine EPA regions and for
the nation as a whole.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Superfund, National Priorities List, US EPA Region 4.

0359 NPL Characterization Project: Region 5 Results

Order Number PB92-963309CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
The report is one in a series providing information on the
nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site as-
sessment program. It is intended to provide a 'snapshot' of
sites in Region 5 on the NPL as of February 1991. Separate
reports are available for the other nine EPA regions and for
the nation as a whole.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Superfund, National Priorities List, US EPA Region 5.

0360 NPL Characterization Project: Region 6 Results

Order Number PB92-963310CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
The report is one in a series providing information on the
nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site as-
sessment program. It is intended to provide a 'snapshot' of
sites in Region 6 on the NPL as of February 1991. Separate
reports are available for the other nine EPA regions and for
the nation as a whole.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Assessment & Listing

and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 96p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Superfund, National Priorities List, US EPA Region 6.

0361 NPL Characterization Project: Region 7 Results

Order Number PB92-963311CDH, price: PC A05/WF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
The report is one in a series providing information on the
nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site as-
sessment program. It is intended to provide a 'snapshot' of
sites in Region 7 on the NPL as of February 1991. Separate
reports are available for the other nine EPA regions and for
the nation as a whole.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Superfund, National Priorities List, US EPA Region 7.

0362 NPL Characterization Project: Region B Results

Order Number PB92-963312CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
The report is one in a series providing information on the
nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site as-
sessment program. It is intended to provide a 'snapshot' of
sites in Region 8 on the NPL as of February 1991. Separate
reports are available for the other nine EPA Regions and for
the nation as a whole.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Superfund, National Priorities List, US EPA Region.

0363 NPL Characterization Project: Region 9 Results

Order Number PB92-963313CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
The report is one in a series providing information on the
nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site as-
sessment program. It is intended to provide a "snapshot' of
sites in Region 9 on the NPL as of February 1991. Separate
reports are available for the other nine EPA Regions and for
the nation as a whole.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Superfund, National Priorities List, US EPA Region 9.

0364 NPL Characterization Project: Region 10 Results

Order Number PB92-963314CDH, price; PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
The report is one in a series providing information on the
nature of the sites being evaluated by the Superfund site as-
sessment program. It is intended to provide a 'snapshot' of
sites in Region 10 on the NPL as of February 1991. Separate

reports are available for the other nine EPA regions and for
the nation as a whole.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Superfund, National Priorities List.

0365 NPL Construction Completion Definition at
Bioremediation and Soil Vapor Extraction Sites

Order Number PB93-963327CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 21 Jun 93
The report discusses EPA's policy for categorizing bioreme-
diation and soil vapor extraction sites as Construction Com-
pletions. Technologies addressed are: in-situ soil vapor ex-
traction, in-situ bioremediation, and ex-situ bioremediation.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $450). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 5p.

Subject Index keywords: Government policies, Construc-
tion, Hazardous materials, Superfund, Directives, National
Priority List.

0366 PA Review Checklist

Order Number PB93-963342CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 28 Apr 93
The preliminary assessment (PA) review checklist was de-
signed to evaluate the quality of PA work products. The
review will ensure that EPA decisions concerning the disposi-
tion of sites are made in a nationally consistent, scientifically
based, and efficient manner. The order in which information
is presented in the PA does not have to be consistent with
the checklist, but the PA should be organized in a logical se-
quence and consistent with PA guidance. The checklist and
the PA guidance manual can be ordered from the National
Technical Information Service (NTIS) by calling 703-487-
4650. To order both documents, the order number Is PB92-
963303. The checklist by itself is order number PB93-
963342.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $450). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB92-963303. I6p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Assessments.

0367 PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score) User's
Manual and Tutorial. Version 2.1

Order Number PB93 108322CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Hazardous Site Evaluation Div; 16 Nov 92
The PA-Score software package is comprised of the PA-
Score and PA-Print computer programs and the users
manual. The PA-Score software package has been devel-
oped to assist preliminary assessment (PA) evaluations by
generating an upper bound estimate of the Hazard Ranking
System (HRS) score and associated documentation for a
site. The PA-Score computer program (PA-Score) assists in-
vestigators in meeting PA evaluation requirements. PA-Score

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Assessment &

Listing

performs PA calculations from raw data to calculate site
scores. The PA-Print computer program (PA-Print) generates
PA scoresheets and the Potential Hazardous Waste Site Pre-
liminary Assessment form. The users manual provides in-
structions to install and use PA-Score and PA-Print
Specifications; For system on diskette, see PB93-500346
and PB93-5Q0353. 82p.

Subject index keywords: User manuals{Gomputer pro-
grams), Superfund, Waste management, Hazardous materi-
als, Environmental surveys, Preliminary Assessment.

0368 PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score), Version
1.0 (for Microcomputers)

Order Number PB92-50Q032CDH, price: D02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
The PA-Score computer program has been developed to
assist Superfund site assessment investigations in the
Hazard Ranking System (HRS) at the Preliminary Assess-
ment stage of site scoring. The Preliminary Assessment is
used to assess the relative threat associated with actual or
potential releases of hazardous substances to ground water,
surface water, soil, and air.

Specifications: The software is on one, 5 1 /4 inch diskette,
1.2M high density. File format: ASCII documentation includ-
ed; may be ordered separately as PB92-963302. System:
IBM PC or compatible; MS DOS 3.0 operating system, 384K.
Language: Compiled C. See also PB92-500024, PB91-
507509, PB91-506964, PB90-502030, PB90-501487, PB89-
186068, PB91-592001, PB91-591331, PB91-591311, and
PB90-591781. 1 diskette.

Subject index keywords: Software, Superfund, Hazardous
materials, Waste management, Environmental surveys, Pre-
liminary Assessment.

0369 PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score), Version
2.1, 3 1/2 inch (for Microcomputers)

Order Number PB93-500353CDH, price: D02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Hazardous Site Evaluation Div; Oct 92

The PA-Score computer program has been developed to
assist Superfund site assessment investigations in the
Hazard Ranking System (HRS) at the Preliminary Assess-
ment stage of site scoring. The Preliminary Assessment is
used to assess the relative threat associated with actual or
potential releases of hazardous substances to ground water,
surface water, soil, and air. Version 2.1 is an update that re-
solves a programming error in the scoring of the resident
population targets for soil exposure.

Specifications: The software is on one 3 112 inch diskette,
1.44M high density. File format: ASCII. Documentation in-
cluded; may be ordered separately as PB93-108322. System:
IBM compatible; MS DOS operating system, 384K. Lan-
guage: Compiled C. See also PB92-500024, PB91-507509,
PB91-506964, PB90-502030, PB90-501487, PB89-186068,
PB92-592001, PB91-591331, PB91-591311, and PB90-
591781. Other formats available as 5 1/4 inch diskette,
PB93-500346. 1 diskette.

Subject index keywords: Software, Superfund, Waste dis-
posal, Hazardous materials, Site surveys, Hazard Ranking
System.

0370 PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score), Version
2.1, 5 1/4 inch (for Microcomputers)

Order Number PB93-500346CDH, price: D02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Hazardous Site Evaluation Div; Oct 92
The PA-Score computer program has been developed to
assist Superfund site assessment investigations in the
Hazard Ranking System (HRS) at the Preliminary Assess-
ment stage of ate scoring. The Preliminary Assessment is
used to assess the relative threat associated with actual or
potential releases of hazardous substances to ground water,
surface water, soil, and air. Version 2.1 is an update that re-
solves a programming error in the scoring of the resident
population targets for soil exposure.

Specifications: The software is on one (1) 5 1/4 inch dis-
kettes, 1.2M high density. File format: ASCII. Documentation
included; may be ordered separately as PB93-108322.
System: IBM PC or Compatible; MS DOS 3.0 operating
system, 384K. Language: Compiled C. Supersedes PB92-
500032. See also PB92-500024, PB91-507509, PB91-
506964, PB90-502030, PB90-501487, PB89-186068, PB92-
592001, PB91-591331, PB91-591311, and PB90-591781,
Other formats available as 3 1/2 inch, 1.44 MB diskette,
PB93-500353. 1 diskette.

Subject index keywords: Software, Superfund, Waste dis-
posal, Hazardous materials, Site surveys, Hazard Ranking
System,

0371 PA-Score Software, Version 1.0. Users Manual and
Tutorial

Order Number PB92-963302CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
The PA-Score software package is comprised of the PA-
Score and PA-Print computer programs and the users
manual. The PA-Score software package has been devel-
oped to assist preliminary assessment (PA) evaluations by
generating an upper bound estimate of the Hazard Ranking
System (HRS) score and associated documentation for a
site. The PA-Score computer program (PA-Score) assists in-
vestigators in meeting PA evaluation requirements. PA-Score
performs PA calculations from raw data to calculate site
scores. The PA-Print computer program (PA-Print) generates
PA scoresheets and the Potential Hazardous Waste Site Pre-
liminary Assessment form. The users manual provides in-
structions to install and use PA-Score and PA-Print.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. For system on diskette, see PB92-
500032. 73p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, User
manuals(Computer programs), Hazardous materials, Waste
management, Environmental surveys, Preliminary Assess-
ment.

0372 Preliminary Ranking Evaluation Score (PREscore)
Version 1.1 (for Microcomputers)

Order Number PB92-503507CDH, price: D02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Hazardous Site Evaluation Div; Jul 92
The PREscore computer program has been developed to
assist Superfund site assessment investigations in Hazard

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Assessment & Listing

Ranking System (HRS) site scoring. The HRS is used to
assess the relative threat associated with actual or potential
releases of hazardous substances to ground water, surface
water, soil, and air. The HRS is the primary means by which
EPA evaluates sites for the National Priorities List (NPL), the
list of the hazardous waste sites that are eligible for remedial
funding under the Superfund program. PREscore is designed
to be user-friendly, operating via hierarchically-dependent
spreadsheets that allow data to be entered quickly and effi-
ciently. Significant program features include: instant score
calculation and continuous score display, multiple site-sce-
nario testing capability, extensive help screens, and compre-
hensive documentation ability. PREscore fully automates the
HRS, allowing for the entry and evaluation of all types of
site-related information. In addition, PREscore contains HRS-
related hazardous substance information derived from the
Agency's Superfund Chemical Data Matrix (SCDM), which in-
cludes substance characteristics. PREscore is accompanied
by PREprint, a program that produces an extensive docu-
mentation record for sites evaluated by PREscore.
Specifications: The software is on one 5 1/4 inch diskette,
1.2M high density. Documentation included; may be ordered
separately as PB92-963349. System: IBM-PC or compatible;
MS DOS 3.1 operating system, 384K. Language: Compiled
'C'. See also PB91-506964, PB92-592291, PB90-591791 and
PB92-50Q024. 1 diskette.

Subject index keywords: Models-Simulation, Superfund,
Hazardous materials, Environmental impact assessments,
Waste disposal, PREscore program, Hazard Ranking System.

0373 Preliminary Ranking Evaluation Score (PREscore)
Version 2.0 (for Microcomputers)

Order Number PB93-505915CDH, price: D03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Hazardous Site Evaluation Div; May 93
The PREscore computer program has been developed to
assist Superfund site assessment investigations in Hazard
Ranking System (HRS) site scoring. The HRS is used to
assess the relative threat associated with actual or potential
releases of hazardous substances to ground water, surface
water, soil, and air. PREscore is designed to be user-friendly,
operating via hierarchically-dependent spreadsheets that
allow data to be entered quickly and efficiently. Significant
program features include: Instant score calculation and con-
tinuous score display; Multiple site-scenario testing capability;
Extensive Help screens; Comprehensive documentation abili-
ty; PREscore fully automates the HRS, allowing for the entry
and evaluation of all types of site-related Information includ-
ing sampling data, waste quantities and waste characteris-
tics, physical parameters of the site, population data, and ad-
ministrative information. In addition, PREscore contains HRS-
related hazardous substance information derived from the
Agency's Superfund Chemical Data Matrix (SCDM), which in-
cludes substance characteristics such as toxicity and persist-
ence, and concentration benchmarks for the substances
commonly encountered at Superfund sites. PREscore is ac-
companied by PREprint, a program that produces an exten-
sive documentation record for sites evaluated by PREscore.
Specifications; Both 3 1/2 inch and 5 1/4 inch high density
diskettes are provided. Documentation included; may be or-
dered separately as PB93-192698. System: IBM-PC or com-
patible; MS DOS 3.1 operating system, 384K. Language:
Compiled 'C. Supersedes PB92-503507. See also PB90-

591791, PB92-592291, PB92-501774, PB93 500742, and
PB93-500353. 1 diskette.

Subject index keywords; Software, Models-simulation, Su-
perfund, PREscore computer model.

0374 PREscore Software, Users Manual and Tutorial.
Version 1.0

Order Number PB92-963349CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, IX. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
The manual serves as a users manual and tutorial for the
PREscore computer program. The PREscore package has
been developed by EPA Headquarters to assist site assess-
ment investigations and Hazard Ranking System scoring by
generating a Preliminary Ranking Evaluation (PRE)score and
associated documentation. The users manual consists of
three parts that introduce one to the software package and
take one through installation procedures, provide a tutorial by
walking one through screens, and provide instruction for
using PREprint to perform printing functions on PREscore
site files.

Subject index keywords: Site surveys, Computer applica-
tions, Waste management, Hazardous materials, Superfund,
HRS(Hazard Ranking System).

0375 PREscore Software: Users Manual and Tutorial
Version 2 0

Order Number PB93-192698CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; May 93
The PREscore software package has been developed to
assist site assessment investigations and Hazard Ranking
System (HRS) scoring by generating a Preliminary Ranking
Evaluation score and associated documentation. The users
manual consists of three parts. Chapter 1, 'Getting Started',
introduces you to the software package and takes you
through the procedures necessary to install PREscore soft-
ware on your computer. Chapter 2, 'Tutorial', provides an ini-
tial step-by-step 'hands-on' lesson in using PREscore by
'walking' you through a series of screens, entering and edit-
ing data. Chapter 3, 'Printing', provides instruction for using
PREprint, which performs printing functions on PREscore site
files. The manual assumes some familiarity with the IBM PC-
type platform. Actual scoring of a site with PREscore re-
quires little, if any, knowledge of the Disk Operating System
(DOS).

Specifications; For system on diskette, see PB93-505915.
91 p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials, PREscore computer model.

0376 Regional Quality Control Guidance for NPL
Candidate Sites

Order Number PB92-963352CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 91
The guidance manual provides recommended procedures for
a Regional Quality Control program for the evaluation of
Hazard Ranking System packages. The guidance, intended

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Assessment &

Listing

primarily for use by EPA Regional offices, is to standardize
Regional QC review and improve HRS package quality. The
document should serve anyone preparing or reviewing HRS
packages, and should complement other guidances for con-
ducting PAs and Sis, and applying the HRS, to assist Re-
gions in the site listing process.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Quality con-
trol, Ranking, Superfund, US EPA regions, National Priorities
List.

0377 Revised Hazard Ranking System: An Improved Tool
for Screening Superfund Sites

Order Number PB91-921307CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 90
The Fact Sheet discusses the revised HRS which retains the
same cutoff score and basic approach as the original HRS,
while incorporating SARA requirements as well as improve-
ments identified as necessary by EPA and the public. The re-
vised HRS retains the ground water, surface water, and air
pathways, drops the direct contact and fire/explosion path-
ways, and adds a fourth pathway, soil exposure. Several key
provisions of the revised HRS make it more comprehensive.
Other provisions make the revised HRS more accurate. The
complexity and scope of the issues involved in revising the
HRS required EPA to get widespread input. The majority of
the commenters believed that the revised HRS represented
an improvement over the original HRS. The result is a re-
vised HRS that is a practical and effective tool in identifying
the nation's worst hazardous waste sites.

Subject index keywords; Superfund, Hazardous materials,
On-site investigations, Waste management, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, Hazard Ranking System.

0378 Revised Hazard Ranking System: Background
Information

Order Number PB91-921303CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 90
The Fact Sheet discusses the Hazard Ranking System
(HRS) in response to the Superfund Amendments and Reau-
thorization Act of 1986 (SARA). The HRS is the scoring
system EPA uses to assess the relative threat associated
with the release or potential release of hazardous sub-
stances from a waste site. The HRS score is the primary cri-
terion EPA uses to determine whether a site should be
placed on the National Priorities List (NPL). The NPL identi-
fies sites that warrant further investigation to determine If
they pose risks to public health or the environment. Sites on
the NPL are eligible for long-term 'remedial action' financed
under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Com-
pensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), as amended
by SARA. SARA authorizes a 'Hazardous Substances Super-
fund' totalling $8.5 billion over 5 years to pay costs not as-
sumed by those responsible for problems at a site. The HRS
uses data that can be collected relatively quickly and inex-

pensively, thus allowing most Superfund resources to be di-
rected to remedial actions at sites on the NPL.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 13 p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
On-site investigations, Waste management, Hazard Ranking
System, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

0379 Revised Hazard Ranking System: Evaluating Sites
After Waste Removals

Order Number PB92-963326CDH, price; PC A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 91
The fact sheet defines the concept of 'qualifying removal',
explains how to score sites where qualifying removals have
been conducted, and discusses some of the management
implications of the removal policy. In addition, the fact sheet
provides examples of how to score sites where removals
have occurred.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Project
management, Removal, Pollution control, Superfund.

0380 Revised Hazard Ranking System (HRS): Final Rule

Order Number PB91-100600CDH, price: PC A16/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 9 Nov 90
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has revised
the Hazard Ranking System (HRS) in response to the Super-
fund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA).
The HRS is the scoring system EPA uses to assess the rela-
tive threat associated with the release or potential release of
hazardous substances from a waste site. The HRS score is
the primary criterion EPA uses to determine whether a site
should be placed on the National Priorities List (NPL). "Hie
NPL identifies sites that warrant further investigation to deter-
mine if they pose risks to public health or the environment.
Sites on the NPL are eligible for long-term 'remedial action"
financed under the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), as
amended by SARA. The revised HRS retains the same cutoff
score and basic approach as the original HRS, while incorpo-
rating SARA requirements as well as improvements identified
as necessary by EPA and the public. The revised HRS re-
tains the ground water, surface water, and air pathways
drops the direct contact and fire/explosion pathways, and
adds a forth pathway, soil exposure.

Specifications; 352p.

Subject index keywords: Ranking, Hazardous materials,
Pollution control, Superfund.

0381 Revised Hazard Ranking System: Qs and As

Order Number PB91-921305CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 90
The Fact Sheet discusses U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) revised Hazard Ranking System (HRS) in re-
sponse to the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Assessment & Listing

Act (SARA). These revised HRS Qs and As address the
SARA requirements for the revised HRS, specific revisions to
the HRS, the impact of the revised HRS on the site assess-
ment and remedial processes, and selection of the cutoff
score,

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Hazard Ranking System.

0382 Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)

Region 1 (for Microcomputers). Date of Coverage:
October 1991

Order Number PB93-506111CDH, price: D03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Oct 91
The Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID) is a data-
base of information sources designed to support EPA Re-
gional, state, and contractor staff in data collection efforts for
site investigation activities. SAID is designed to assist data
collection activities, especially during Preliminary Assess-
ments (PAs) and Site Inspections (Sis), and to support
Hazard Ranking system (HRS) package preparation. SAID
entries are cross-referenced according to categories of infor-
mation and geographical areas and may be accessed in a
variety of ways. The SAID database system is supplemented
by a User's Guide and EPA region specific 'Phone book* list-
ing of information sources.

Specifications: The datafile is on one 3 1/2 inch diskette,
1.44M high density. Documentation included; may be ordered
separately as PB93-192797. System: IBM compatible; MS
DOS operating system. 480K RAM required (550— recom-
mended). See also Region 1 - PB93-506111, Region 2 -
PB93-506129, Region 3 - PB93-506137, Region 4 - PB93-
506145, Region 5 - PB93-506152, Region 6 - PB93-506160,
Region 7 - PB93-506178, Region 8 - PB93-506186, Region 9
- PB93-506194, Region 10 - PB93-506202. 1 diskette.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Data bases, Software,
SAID(Site Assessment Information Directory).

0383 Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)

Region 2 (for Microcomputers). Date of Coverage:
October 1991

Order Number PB93-506129CDH, price: D03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Oct 91
The Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID) is a data-
base of information sources designed to support EPA Re-
gional, state, and contractor staff in data collection efforts for
site investigation activities. SAID is designed to assist data
collection activities, especially during Preliminary Assess-
ments (PAs) and Site Inspections (Sis), and to support
Hazard Ranking system (HRS) package preparation, SAID
entries are cross-referenced according to categories of infor-
mation and geographical areas and may be accessed in a
variety of ways. The SAID database system is supplemented
by a User's Guide and EPA region specific 'Phone book' list-
ing of information sources.

Specifications: The datafile is on one 3 1/2 inch diskette,
1.44M high density. Documentation included; may be ordered
separately as PB93-192805. System: IBM compatible; MS
DOS operating system. 480K RAM required (550— recom-
mended). See also Region 1 - PB93-506111, Region 2 -

PB93-506129, Region 3 - PB93-506137, Region 4 - PB93-
506145, Rgion 5 - PB93-506152, Region 6 - PB93-506160,
Region 7 - PB93-506178, Region 8 - PB93-506186, Region 9

- PB93-506194, Region 10 - PB93-506202. 1 diskette.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Data bases, Software,
SAID(Site Assessment Information Directory).

0384 Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)

Region 3 (for Microcomputers). Date of Coverage:
October 1991

Order Number PB93-506137CDH, price: D03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Oct 91
The Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID) is a data-
base of information sources designed to support EPA Re-
gional, state, and contractor staff in data collection efforts for
site investigation activities. SAID is designed to assist data
collection activities, especially during Preliminary Assess-
ments (PAs) and Site Inspections (Sis), and to support
Hazard Ranking system (HRS) package preparation. SAID
entries are cross-referenced according to categories of infor-
mation and geographical areas and may be accessed in a
variety of ways. The SAID database system is supplemented
by a User's Guide and EPA region specific 'Phone book' list-
ing of information sources.

Specifications: The datafile is on one 3 1/2 inch diskette,
1.44M high density. Documentation included; may be ordered
separately as PB93-192813. System: IBM compatible; MS
DOS operating system. 480K RAM required (550— recom-
mended). See also Region 1 - PB93-506111, Region 2 -
PB93-506129, Region 3 - PB93-506137, Region 4 - PB93-
506145, Region 5 - PB93-506152, Region 6 - PB93-506160,
Region 7 - PB93-506178, Region 8 - PB93-506186, Region 9

- PB93-506194, Region 10 - PB93-506202. 1 diskette.
Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Data bases, Software,
SAID(Site Assessment Information Directory).

0385 Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)

Region 4 (for Microcomputers). Date of Coverage:
October 1991

Order Number PB93-506145CDH, price: D03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Oct 91
The Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID) is a data-
base of information sources designed to support EPA Re-
gional, state, and contractor staff in data collection efforts for
site investigation activities. SAID is designed to assist data
collection activities, especially during Preliminary Assess-
ments (PAs) and Site Inspections (Sis), and to support
Hazard Ranking system (HRS) package preparation. SAID
entries are cross-referenced according to categories of infor-
mation and geographical areas and may be accessed in a
variety of ways. The SAID database system is supplemented
by a User's Guide and EPA region specific 'Phone book' list-
ing of information sources.

Specifications: The datafile is on one 3 1/2 inch diskette,
1.44M high density. Documentation included; may be ordered
separately as PB93-192821. System: IBM compatible; MS
DOS operating system. 480K RAM required (550— recom-
mended). See also Region 1 - PS93-506111, Region 2 -
PB93-506129, Region 3 - PB93-506137, Region 4 - PB93-
506145, Region 5 - PB93-506152, Region 6 - PB93-506160,
Region 7 - PB93-506178, Region 8 - PB93-506186, Region 9

- PB93-506194, Region 10 - PB93-506202. 1 diskette.

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Assessment &

Listing

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Data bases, Software,
SAID(Site Assessment Information Directory).

03S6 Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)

Region 5 (for Microcomputers). Date of Coverage: 1991

Order Number PB93-506152CDH, price: D03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Oct 91
The Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID) is a data-
base of information sources designed to support EPA Re-
gional, state, and contractor staff in data collection efforts for
site investigation activities. SAID is designed to assist data
collection activities, especially during Preliminary Assess-
ments (PAs) and Site Inspections (Sis), and to support
Hazard Ranking system (HRS) package preparation. SAID
entries are cross-referenced according to categories of infor-
mation and geographical areas and may be accessed in a
variety of ways. The SAID database system is supplemented
by a User's Guide and EPA region specific 'Phone book* list-
ing of information sources.

Specifications: The datafile is on one 3 1/2 inch diskette,
1.44M high density. Documentation included; may be ordered
separately as PB93-192839. System: IBM compatible; MS
DOS operating system. 480K RAM required (550— recom-
mended). See also Region 1 - PB93-506111, Region 2 -
PB93-506129, Region 3 - PB93-506137, Region 4 - PB93-
506145, Region 5 - PB93-506152, Region 6 - PB93-506160,
Region 7 - PB93-506178, Region 8 - PB93-506186, Region 9

- PB93-506194, Region 10 - PB93-506202. 1 diskette.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Data bases, Software,
SAID(Site Assessment Information Directory).

0387 Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)

Region 6 (for Microcomputers). Date of Coverage:
October 1991

Order Number PB93-506160CDH, price: D03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Oct 91
The Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID) is a data-
base of information sources designed to support EPA Re-
gional, state, and contractor staff in data collection efforts for
site investigation activities. SAID is designed to assist data
collection activities, especially during Preliminary Assess-
ments (PAs) and Site Inspections (Sis), and to support
Hazard Ranking system (HRS) package preparation. SAID
entries are cross-referenced according to categories of infor-
mation and geographical areas and may be accessed in a
variety of ways. The SAID database system is supplemented
by a User's Guide and EPA region specific 'Phone book" list-
ing of information sources.

Specifications: The datafile is on one 3 1/2 inch diskette,
1.44M high density. Documentation included; may be ordered
separately as PB93-192847. System: IBM compatible; MS
DOS operating system. 480K RAM required (550- recom-
mended). See also Region 1 - PB93-506111, Region 2 -
PB93-506129, Region 3 - P393-506137, Region 4 - PB93-
508145, Region 5 - PB93-506152, Region 6 - PB93-506160,
Region 7 - PB93-506178, Region 8 - PB93-506186, Region 9

- PB93-506194, Region 10 - PB93-506202. 1 diskette.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Data bases, Software,
SAID(Site Assessment Information Directory).

0388 Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)

Region 7 (for Microcomputers). Date of Coverage:
October 1991

Order Number PB93-506178CDH, price: D03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Oct 91
The Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID) is a data-
base of information sources designed to support EPA Re-
gional, state, and contractor staff in data collection efforts for
site investigation activities. SAID is designed to assist data
collection activities, especially during Preliminary Assess-
ments (PAs) and Site Inspections (Sis), and to support
Hazard Ranking system (HRS) package preparation. SAID
entries are cross-referenced according to categories of infor-
mation and geographical areas and may be accessed in a
variety of ways. The SAID database system is supplemented
by a User's Guide and EPA region specific 'Phone book' list-
ing of information sources.

Specifications: The datafile is on one 3 1/2 inch diskette,
1 44M high density. Documentation included; may be ordered
separately as PB93-192854. System: IBM compatible; MS
DOS operating system. 480K RAM required (550— recom-
mended). See also Region 1 - PB93-506111, Region 2 -
PB93-506129, Region 3 - PB93-506137, Region 4 - PB93-
506145, Region 5 - PB93-506152, Region 6 - PB93-506160,
Region 7 - PB93-506178, Region 8 - PB93-506186, Region 9

- PB93-506194, Region 10 - PB93-506202. 1 diskette.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Data bases, Software,
SAlD(Site Assessment Information Directory).

0389 Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)

Region 8 (for Microcomputers). Date of Coverage: 1991

Order Number PB93-506186CDH, price: D03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Oct 91
The Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID) is a data-
base of information sources designed to support EPA Re-
gional, state, and contractor staff in data collection efforts for
site investigation activities. SAID is designed to assist data
collection activities, especially during Preliminary Assess-
ments (PAs) and Site Inspections (Sis), and to support
Hazard Ranking system (HRS) package preparation. SAID
entries are cross-referenced according to categories of infor-
mation and geographical areas and may be accessed in a
variety of ways. The SAID database system is supplemented
by a User's Guide and EPA region specific 'Phone book' list-
ing of information sources.

Specifications: The datafile is on one 3 1/2 inch diskette,
1.44M high density. Documentation included; may be ordered
separately as PB93-213817. System: IBM compatible; MS
DOS operating system. 480K RAM required (550- recom-
mended). See also Region 1 - PB93-506111, Region 2 -
PB93-506129, Region 3 - PB93-506137, Region 4 - PB93-
506145, Region 5 - PB93-506152, Region 6 - PB93-506160,
Region 7 - PB93-506178, Region 8 - PB93-506186, Region 9

- PB93-506194, Region 10 - PB93-506202. 1 diskette.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Data bases, Software,
SAID(Site Assessment Information Directory).

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Assessment & Listing

0390 Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)
Region 9 (for Microcomputers). Date of Coverage:
October 1991

Order Number PB93-506194CDH, price; D03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Oct 91
The Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID) is a data-
base of information sources designed to support EPA Re-
gional, state, and contractor staff in data collection efforts for
site investigation activities. SAID is designed to assist data
collection activities, especially during Preliminary Assess-
ments (PAs) and Site Inspections (Sis), and to support
Hazard Ranking system (HRS) package preparation. SAID
entries are cross-referenced according to categories of infor-
mation and geographical areas and may be accessed in a
variety of ways. The SAID database system is supplemented
by a User's Guide and EPA region specific 'Phone book' list-
ing of information sources.

Specifications: The datafile is on one 3 1/2 Inch diskette,
1.44M high density. Documentation included; may be ordered
separately as PB93-213825. System: IBM compatible; MS
DOS operating system. 480K RAM required (550— recom-
mended). See also Region 1 - PB93-506111, Region 2 -
PB93-506129, Region 3 - PB93-506137, Region 4 - PB93-
506145, Region 5 - PB93-506152, Region 6 - PB93-506160,
Region 7 - PB93-5Q6178, Region 8 - PB93-506186, Region 9

- PB93-506194, Region 10 - PB93-506202. 1 diskette.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Data bases, Software,
SAID(Site Assessment Information Directory).

0391 Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID)

Region 10 (for Microcomputers). Date of Coverage;
October 1991

Order Number PB93-506202CDH, price: D03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Oct 91
The Site Assessment Information Directory (SAID) is a data-
base of information sources designed to support EPA Re-
gional, state, and contractor staff in data collection efforts for
site investigation activities. SAID is designed to assist data
collection activities, especially during Preliminary Assess-
ments (PAs) and Site Inspections (Sis), and to support
Hazard Ranking system (HRS) package preparation. SAID
entries are cross-referenced according to categories of infor-
mation and geographical areas and may be accessed in a
variety of ways. The SAID database system is supplemented
by a User's Guide and EPA region specific 'Phone book' list-
ing of information sources.

Specifications: The datafile is on one 3 1/2 inch diskette,
1.44M high density. Documentation included; may be ordered
separately as PB93-213833. System: IBM compatible; MS
DOS operating system. 480K RAM required (550 recom-
mended). See also Region 1 - PB93-506111, Region 2 -
PB93-506129, Region 3 - PB93-506137, Region 4 - PB93-
506145, Region 5 - PB93-506152, Region 6 - PB93-506160,
Region 7 - PB93-506178, Region 8 - PB93-506186, Region 9

- PB93-506194, Region 10 - PB93-506202. 1 diskette.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Data bases, Software,
SAID(Site Assessment Information Directory).

0392 Standard Document for Remedial Site Assessment
Decisions

Order Number PB93-963268CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 8 Dec 92
The National Contingency Plan (NCP) requires the U.S. Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency (EPA) to assess all releases
and threatened releases throughout the United States pursu-
ant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Com-
pensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA). as amended.
In accordance with the NCP, EPA conducts PAs and Sis to
assess sites where releases or threatened releases may
exist. After evaluating information collected during a PA or
SI, EPA then decides on the need for further investigative or
response action. All Regions document remedial site assess-
ment decisions, but procedures vary. To ensure adequate
documentation of such decisions, the site assessment pro-
gram has developed a standard site assessment decision
sheet.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal.

0393 Superfund Fact Sheet: Exposure Pathways

Order Number PB93-963306CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 92
The fact sheet describes exposure pathways, the different
manners in which people can be exposed to hazardous ma-
terials. Explanations of several pathways involving surface
waters, ground water, air, soil, and the food chain are given.
The fact sheet is one in a series providing reference informa-
tion about Superfund issues and is intended for readers with
no formal scientific training.

Subject index keywords: Environmental exposure pathway,
Path of pollutants, Hazardous materials, Public health, Super-
fund.

0394 Supplemental Guide to Video on Superfund Site
Assessment Screening: A National Priority

Order Number PB93-963323CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Jan 93
EPA's Superfund program uses a systematic site assessment
screening process to determine which hazardous waste sites
should be considered a national priority. The site assessment
screening process is an objective, methodical process that
follows established procedures and uses a uniform set of de-
cision-making criteria The video is intended for state, EPA,
or contractor personnel who perform site assessment
screening for Superfund. The video gives an overview of the
Superfund site assessment screening process and provides
those performing the tasks an overall understanding of their
work.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Compliance With

Other Laws

and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 63p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Site surveys, Risk as-
sessment.

0395 Update No. 2 to 'Procedures for Completion and
Deletion of NPL Sites'

Order Number PB92-963344CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 19 Feb 92
The purpose of the directive is to revise EPA guidance to
clarify the distinction between the terms 'site completion' and
'construction completion."

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Superfund.

PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Compliance With Other Laws

0396 ARAR's Q's and A's. Compliance with the Toxicity
Characteristics Rule. Part 1

Order Number PB90-273814CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 90
The document is a part of a series of fact sheets that pro-
vide answers to questions that arose in developing applica-
ble or relevant and appropriate requirements (ARARs) poli-
cies, training sessions, and in identifying and complying with
ARARs at specific sites. The sheet addresses compliance
with the recently promulgated Toxicity Characteristics Rule
(55 FR 11798, March 29, 1990).

Specifications: 6p.

Subject index keywords: Project management, Hazardous
materials, Toxicity, Superfund, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Waste management, Remedial action.

0397 ARARs Fact Sheet: Compliance with the Clean Air
Act and Associated Air Quality Requirements

Order Number PB92-963282CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 92
The fact sheet provides updated guidance on compliance
with the Clean Air Act, as amended November 1990 (42 USC
7401 et seq.) and related air quality rules under other envi-
ronmental statutes. It also addresses developing applicable
or relevant and appropriate requirements (ARARs) policies
and identifying and complying with ARARs at specific sites.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, De-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 30p.

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Air pollution abatement, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response.

0398 ARARs Q's and A'S

Order Number PB90-273780CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 89
The document is part of a series of fact sheets that provide
answers to questions that arose in developing applicable or
relevant and appropriate requirements (ARARs) policies,
training sessions, and in identifying and complying with
ARARs at specific sites. Responses covered in the fact
sheet reflect current program practice and include policies
and language from the proposed National Contingency Plan
(NCP).

Specifications: 7p.

Subject Index keywords: Project management, Hazardous
materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response,
Superfund, Remedial action, Remedial response, Waste
management.

0399 ARARS Q's and A's: Compliance with Federal Water
Quality Criteria

Order Number PB90-274267CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jun 90
The document is part of a series of fact sheets that provide
answers to questions that arose in developing applicable or
relevant and appropriate requirements (ARARs) policies,
training sessions, and in identifying and complying with
ARARs at specific sites. The sheet addresses compliance
with Federal Water Quality Criteria as ARARs.

Specifications: See also PB90-273780.11 p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Project
management, Water quality, Superfund, Waste management,
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

0400 ARARs Q's and A's Compliance with New SDWA
National Primary Drinking Water Regulations for Organic
and Inorganic Chemicals

Order Number PB91-921363CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 91
The report provides guidance on questions that arose in de-
veloping ARAR policies, and in indentifying and complying
with ARARs at specific sites concerning the new Safe Drink-
ing Water Regulations (Phase If), which were promulgated on
January 30, 1991.

Subject index keywords: Water quality, Drinking water,
Water pollution, Superfund.

0401 ARARs Q's and A's: General Policy, RCRA, CWA,
SDWA, Post-ROD Information, and Contingent Waivers

Order Number PB91-921341CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 91
These 'ARARs Q's and A's' are part of a series of Fact
Sheets that provide guidance on a number of question that
arose in developing ARAR policies, in ARARs training ses-
sion, and in identifying and complying with ARARs at specific
sites. This particular Q's and A's Fact Sheet updates and re-
places a Fact Sheet which was first issued in May 1989.

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Compliance With
Other Laws

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required {minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 7p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0402 ARARs Q's and A's: State Ground-Water
Antidegradation Issues

Order Number PB91-921311CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 90
The Fact Sheet discusses, section 121(d)(2) of CFRCLA, as
amended by the 1986 Superfund Amendments and Reau-
thorization Act (SARA), requires that remedial actions must
at least attain Federal and more stringent State applicable or
relevant and appropriate requirements (ARARs) upon com-
pletion of the remedial action. The Q's and A's fact sheet is
designed to provide guidance on the status of State ground-
water antidegradation provisions as potential ARARs for
CERCLA ground-water and soil remedial actions. The guid-
ance in the fact sheet reiterates Agency policy already in
practice in EPA's Regional offices. The goal and policy of the
Superfund program is to return usable ground water to its
beneficial uses within the timeframe that is reasonable, given
the particular circumstances of the site. In addition to their
goal of ground-water cleanup, Superfund has a nondegrada-
tion policy in that they strive for the prevention of further
degradation of the ground water during their remedial ac-
tions. However, it should be noted that more stringent State
standards than those imposed by EPA policy may be im-
posed by State antidegradation requirements. Such State re-
quirements, if they have been determined to be ARARs for
the site, would have to be met (e.g., by meeting the dis-
charge requirements) or waived (e.g., by the interim remedy
waiver). Nevertheless, even where temporary degradation of
the ground water may be required during the remedial action,
they will provide protection by restricting access or providing
institutional controls, and EPA response actions will ultimate-
ly result in restoration of the ground water's beneficial uses.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 9p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Water pollution abatement, Land pollution abatement,
Ground water, Waste management, Applicable or Relevant
and Appropriate Requirements, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response.

0403 ARARs Q's and A's: The Fund-Balancing Waiver

Order Number PB91-921321CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 91
The fact sheet implements the applicable or relevant and ap-
propriate requirements (ARARs) provisions EPA has devel-
oped guidance and provided training to Regions and States
on the identification of and compliance with ARARs. It is part
of a series that provide guidance on a number of questions
that arose in developing ARARs policies, in ARARs training
sessions, and in identifying and complying with ARARs at
specific sites. The fact sheet addresses the Fund-balancing
waiver.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate
Requirements, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Re-
sponse, Fund-balancing waivers.

0404 CERCLA Compliance with Other Environmental
Statutes

Order Number PB91-214098CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 2 Oct 85
The directive sets forth the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) policy on the applicability of the standards, criteria,
advisories, and guidance of other State and Federal environ-
mental and public health statutes to actions taken pursuant
to sections 104 and 106 of the Comprehensive Environmen-
tal Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980
(CERCLA), The policy addresses considerations for on-site
and off-site actions taken under CERCLA.

Specifications: Portions of this document are not fully legi-
ble. 22p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Emergency and Remedial Re-
sponse.

0406 CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual:
CERCLA Compliance with State Requirements

Order Number PB90-272543CDH, price; PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 89
The fact sheet provides a guide to chapter 6 of Part II of the
'CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual." The fifth in a
series, this fact sheet discusses CERCLA compliance with
State requirements, based on policies in proposed revisions
to the National Contingency Plan.

Specifications: See also PB90-272535. 8p.

Subject Index keywords: Project management, Superfund,
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, National
contingency plan.

0406 CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual;
CERCLA Compliance with the CWA and SDWA

Order Number PB90-273806CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 90
The fact sheet provides a guide to Chapters 3 and 4 of Part I
of the 'CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual.' The
sixth in a series, the fact sheet focuses on CERCLA compli-
ance with the Clean Water Act (Chapter 3), and Safe Drink-
ing Water Act (Chapter 4), and discusses other statutes with
provisions relevant to surface water or drinking water.
Specifications: 10p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Guidelines,
Project management, Superfund, Waste management, Office
of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION; Compliance With

Other Laws

0407 CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual:

Guide to Manual

Order Number PB90-274242CDH, price: PC AQ1/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 89
The document serves as a guide to the use of the 'CERCLA
Compliance with Other Laws Manual.' Second in a series,
the Fact Sheet discusses implementation of Applicable or
Relevant and Appropriate Requirements (ARARs) provisions
in the proposed revisions to the National Contingency Plan
(NCP).

Specifications: See also PB90-148461 and PB90-272535,
4p.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Guidelines,
Project management, Superfund, Waste management, Office
of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

0408 CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual:
Overview of ARARs - Focus on ARAR Waivers

Order Number PB90-273798CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 89
The fact sheet summarizes Chapter I Part I of the 'CERCLA
Compliance With Other Laws Manual; Part I,' The third in a
series, the fact sheet provides an overview of Applicable or
Relevant and Appropriate Requirements (ARARs) based on
policies in proposed revisions to the National Contingency
Plan (NCP).

Specifications: 8p,

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Project
management, Superfund, Office of Solid Waste and Emer-
gency Response, Waste management, Comprehensive Envi-
ronmental Response Compensation and Liability Act, Reme-
dial action.

0409 CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual. Part
1. interim Final

Order Number PB90-272535CDH, price: PC A11/MF A02
iCF, Inc., Fairfax, VA.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, DC, Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response; 8 Aug 88

The manual is developed to provide guidance to Remedial
Project Managers (RPMs), State personnel at State-lead Su-
perfund sites, On-Scene Coordinators (OSCs), and other per-
sons responsible for planning response actions under the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,
and Liability Act (CERCLA). The guidance is intended to
assist in the selection of on-site remedial actions that meet
the applicable, or relevant and appropriate requirements
(ARARs) of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
(RCRA), Clean Water Act (CWA), Safe Drinking Water Act
(SDWA), Clean Air Act (CAA), and other Federal and State
environmental laws as required by CERCLA.

Specifications: See also PB90-27255Q. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response. 244p.

Subject index keywords; Manuals, Laws, Pollution regula-
tion, Remedial action, Remedial response, Waste manage-
ment.

0410 CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual:

RCRA ARARS-Focus on Closure Requirements

Order Number PB90-274259CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 89
The document serves as a guide to the use of the 'CERCLA
Compliance with Other Laws Manual: Parts I and II.' The
fourth in a series, the Fact Sheet addresses compliance with
Subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
(RCRA), as amended by the Hazardous and Solid Waste
Amendments of 1984, with a focus on the RCRA Subtitle C
disclosure requirements.

Specifications: See also PB90-273798. 9p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Project
management, Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act.

0411 CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manual:
Summary and Part 2. CAA, TSCA, and Other Statutes

Order Number PB90-272550CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 90
The fact sheet provides a guide to Chapters 2 and 3 of Part
II of the 'CERCLA Compliance With Other Laws Manual.'
The sixth in a series, this fact sheet focuses on CERCLA
compliance with the Clean Air Act (CAA), the Toxic Sub-
stances Control Act (TSCA), and the Federal Insecticide,
Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act. In addition, it discusses
other statutes that set standards for radioactive wastes,
mining wastes, and other resource protection statutes that
are potential Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Re-
quirements (ARARs) for CERCLA actions.

Specifications: See also PB90-272543.11 p.

Subject index keywords: Project management, Superfund,
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

0412 CERCLA Compliance with the RCRA Toxicity
Characteristics (TC) Rule: Part 2

Order Number P391-921309CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 90
The Fact Sheet discusses CERCLA remedial actions which
must comply with the requirements of the Resource Conser-
vation and Recovery Act (RCRA) when they are determined
to be applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements
(ARARs) unless a waiver is justified. For RCRA Subtitle C
hazardous waste requirements to be applicable, the CERCLA
response action must constitute either treatment, storage,
transport, or disposal of a RCRA hazardous waste. There-
fore, to make determinations about the applicability or rel-
evance and appropriateness of RCRA requirements, site
managers need to understand how to identify whether a
CERCLA waste is a RCRA hazardous waste (including when
a waste exhibits the newly promulgated toxicity characteris-
tics (TC)). The purpose of the guide, the second dealing with
the TC rule (see ARARs Qs & As, Compliance with the Tox-
icity Characteristics Rule: Part I, May 1990, Publication
9234.2-08FS) is to provide a general framework for manag-
ing CERCLA wastes in accordance with the new require-
ments.

Specifications; Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Compliance With
Other Laws

and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available irr
paper copy or microfiche. 5p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Remedial action, Toxic substances,
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Compre-
hensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability
Act.

0413 CEROLA (Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act) Compliance with Other
Laws Manual: Part 2. Clean Air Act and Other
Environmental Statutes and State Requirements

Order Number PB90-148461CDH, price: PC A09/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Aug 89
The purpose of the CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual is to assist Remedial Project Managers (RPMs) in
identifying and complying with all applicable or relevant and
appropriate requirements (ARARs) for remedial actions taken
at Superfund sites. This part of the guidance manual ad-
dresses CERCLA compliance with the Clean Air Act and
other environmental statutes for remedial actions.
Specifications: 176p.

Subject index keywords: Statutes, Environmental impacts,
States(United States).

0414 CERCLA Off-Site Policy - Eligibility of Facilities in
Assessment Monitoring

Order Number PB90-249632CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 28 Jul 86
The directive clarifies application of the CERCLA off-site
policy to RCRA commercial facilities in assessment monitor-
ing.

Specifications: 5p.

Subject index keywords: Regulations, Facilities, Superfund,
Remedial action, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Re-
sponse, Assessment monitoring, Businesses.

0415 CERCLA Off-Site Policy: Providing Notice to
Facilities

Order Number PB90-249624CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 12 May 86
The directive assists in providing notice to commercial treat-
ment, storage, and disposal (TSDs) facilities deemed ineligi-
ble to receive CERCLA response wastes. Outlines proce-
dures for facilities to submit written comments on the appli-
cation of the policy to the conditions alleged at their facility.
Specifications: 8p.

Subject index keywords: Regulations, Waste disposal, Su-
perfund, Remedial action, Office of Solid Waste and Emer-
gency Response.

0416 CERCLA Removal Actions at Methane Release Sites

Order Number PB91-190850CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 23 Jan 86
The directive clarifies OERR policy on the appropriateness of
removal actions at methane gas release sites under authority
of CERCLA. CERCLA responses to methane gas releases
should be carefully evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Al-
though the proposed removal action is authorized under

CERCLA 104(a)(1), the responsible party may not be liable
under section 107 for removal action costs.

Specifications: 4p.

Subject index keywords: Air pollution control, Superfund,
Waste disposal, Methane, Office of Solid Waste and Emer-
gency Response.

0417 Compendium of CERCLA ARARs fact sheets and
directives

Order Number DE92004878CDH, price: PC A12/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response. USDOE Assistant
Secretary for Environment, Safety, and Health, Washington,
DC (United States). Office of Environmental Guidance; Oct
91

Section 121 (d) of the Comprehensive Environmental Re-
sponse Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) as amend-
ed by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act
of 1986 (SARA), requires attainment of Federal and State
applicable and relevant and appropriate requirements
(ARARs). Subparts E, Section 300.400(g) "Identification of
applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements" of the
National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingen-
cy Plan (NCP) (55 CFR 8666, March 8, 1990) describes the
process for attaining ARARs. The purpose of this compendi-
um is to provide you with a complete and current source of
"Quick Reference Fact Sheets" and Directives on applicable
and relevant and appropriate requirements (ARARs). These
fact sheets provide overviews of the ARARs for CERCLA
cleanup actions. The Compendium of CERCLA ARARs con-
sists of seven (7) chapters: lists of general fact sheets that
provide introductory information on ARARs; Chapter 2 dis-
cusses air emissions from Superfund air strippers; Chapter 3
deals with Indian Tribal involvement in the Superfund pro-
gram; Chapter 4 discusses soil lead cleanup levels at Super-
fund sites; Chapter 5 discusses the risk associated with Su-
perfund cleanups; Chapter 6 contains four sections that dis-
cuss a variety of RCRA ARARs such as general guidance
topics, land disposal restrictions, Superfund LDR guides, and
toxicity characteristics; and finally, Chapter 7 contains a vari-
ety of ARAR fact sheets and directives on Wastewater, Safe
Drinking Water Act and Groundwater.

Specifications: 254p.

Subject index keywords: Pollution Laws, US Superfund,
Remedial Action, Waste Management.

0418 Compliance with Third Third Requirements Under
the LDRs. Superfund LDR Guide No. 8

Order Number PB91-921313CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 90
The 1984 Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA)
require EPA to promulgate regulations restricting the land
disposal of RCRA hazardous wastes. EPA previously promul-
gated regulations restricting the land disposal of solvent- and
dioxin-containing, California list, First Third, and Second Third
wastes. The Guide (the eigth in a series of LDR guides pre-
pared by the Office of Emergency and Remedial Response
(OERR)) summarizes the key provisions of the Third Third
LDR rule and discusses potential implications for CERCLA
response actions. More detailed guidance on Superfund
compliance with the LDRs is being prepared by the Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER).

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Compliance With

Other Laws

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Guidelines, Hazardous
materials, Waste treatment, Remedial action.

0419 Consideration of ARARs during Removal Actions

Order Number PB92-963410CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 92
The fact sheet summarizes a Superfund Removal Proce-
dures (SRP) volume entitled 'Guidance on the Consideration
of ARARs During Removal Actions' which describes the es-
sential components of applicable or relevant and appropriate
requirements (ARARs) for on-site removal actions, including
identification of potential Federal and State ARARs, determi-
nation of when compliance with ARARs is not required, and
documentation of ARARs evaluations.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Removal,
Superfund.

0420 Consideration of RCRA Requirements In Performing
CERCLA Responses at Mining Waste Sites

Order Number PB91-214205CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 19 Aug 86
The directive discusses mining wastes which will not be reg-
ulated under Subtitle C of RCRA. Mining waste problems will
be addressed by developing a program for regulation under
Subtitle D, In the interim, Superfund will continue to address
these mining waste problems through the RI/FS and ROD/
EDD processes taking into account current Subtitle D re-
quirements as well as options for addressing risks not ad-
dressed by Subtitle D requirements.

Specifications: Portions of this document are not fully legi-
ble. 13p.

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Mine wastes, Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response.

0421 Discharge of Wastewater from CERCLA Sites into
POTWS

Order Number PB90-249616CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 15 Apr 86
The directive addresses the concerns and issues unique to
publicly owned treatment works (POTWs) that must be evalu-
ated before the discharge of CERCLA wastewater to a
POTW.

Specifications: 8p.

Subject index keywords: Regulations, Waste water, Waste
disposal, Superfund, Remedial action, Publicly owned treat-
ment works, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Re-
sponse.

0422 Guide to Delisting of RCRA Wastes for Superfund
Remedial Responses

Order Number PB90-274374CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
The fact sheet discusses the circumstances under which de-
listing wastes may be appropriate, and the procedures for
delisting a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
hazardous waste as part of a Superfund remedial response.
Specifications: 9p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Guidelines,
Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Remedial response.

0423 Guide to Discharging CERCLA Aqueous Wastes to
Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTWs)

Order Number PB91-921364CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 91
The guide provides quick reference to the statutory, policy,
administrative, and technical factors involved in discharging
aqueous wastes generated during Superfund response ac-
tions to a POTW.

Subject index keywords: Waste disposal, Waste treatment,
Hazardous materials, Superfund.

0424 Guide to Obtaining No Migration Variances for
CERCLA Remedial Actions

Order Number PB91-921367CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 91
A 'No Migration' Variance allows land disposal of restricted
wastes not meeting the LDR treatment standards in a specif-
ic unit. The guide outlines procedures for obtaining a No Mi-
gration Variance for RCRA hazardous wastes as part of a
CERCLA response when the LDRs are ARAR.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300), Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 5p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Waste treatment, Superfund.

0425 Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency
Response: Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Sites and
RCRA Corrective Actions

Order Number P391-921339CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 91
The purpose of the Fact Sheet is to explain the principle re-
quirements of the EPA and OSHA worker protection stand-
ards as they apply to employees engaged in hazardous
waste operations at uncontrolled hazardous waste sites, in-
cluding employees who perform corrective actions at RCRA
TSD facilities.

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Compliance With
Other Laws

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management.
Hazardous materials, Occupational safety and health, Office
of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

0426 Homeowners Exempted from Superfund Cleanup
Costs: National Policy Overview

Order Number PB92-963336CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
The USEPA has established a national policy declaring the
average homeowner will not be required to conduct or pay
for cleanup when residential property is part of a federal Su-
perfund site. The national policy and guideline clarifies Su-
perfund's liability system which maintains owners and opera-
tors of properties in need of federal cleanup action are po-
tentially liable for those actions. EPA may hold homeowners
liable for cleanup where their own actions have led to a re-
lease or threatened release of hazardous substances requir-
ing a cleanup of their property, or where the property is used
for non-residential purpose. The policy is designed to allevi-
ate concerns about cleanup liability for homeowners, as well
as parties involved in real estate transactions, such as lend-
ers and title insurers.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Residential
buildings, Liabilities, Pollution control, Superfund, Cleanup.

0427 Interim RCRA/CERCLA Guidance on Non-
Contiguous Sites and On-Site Management on Waste
and Treatment Residue

Order Number PB90-274317CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 27 Mar 86
The directive presents interim guidance with respect to com-
bined treatment of CERCLA waste from non-contiguous loca-
tions; on-site disposal of treatment residue; limitations on
construction of hazardous waste incinerators for on-site
CERCLA use, and off-site treatment of waste and redisposal
on site.

Specifications: 11 p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Guidelines,
Project management. Waste treatment, Superfund, Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Waste management,
Remedial action.

0428 Land Disposal Restrictions as Relevant and
Appropriate Requirements for CERCLA Contaminated
Soil and Debris

Order Number PB91-214973CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 5 Jun 89
Until a rulemaking is completed that establishes treatment
standards for soil and debris, OSWER has concluded that
Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) generally should not be
considered as relevant and appropriate for soil or debris that
does not contain restricted RCRA wastes. The directive
gives suggested language to be incorporated into feasibility
study. For further clarification, the directive has included as
an attachment, directive 9347.1-02.

Specifications: 13p.

Subject index keywords; Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Land Disposal Restrictions, Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

0429 Notification of Out-of-State Shipments of Superfund
Site Wastes

Order Number PB90-272618CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 14 Sep 89
The directive implements EPA's policy that prior to the off-
site shipment of Superfund site wastes to an out-of-State
management facility, EPA Regional personnel will provide
notice to that State's environmental officials.

Specifications: 6p.

Subject index keywords: Interstate transportation, Super-
fund, Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emer-
gency Response, Hazardous materials transportation.

0430 Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatability Variance for
Removal Actions. Superfund LDR Guide No. 6B

Order Number PB91-921310CDH. price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
The Office of Emergency and Remedial Response (OERR)
issued a series of Superfund LDR Guides in July and Decem-
ber of 1989. Since the issuance of these guides, the Environ-
mental Protection Agency, with cooperation from outside par-
ties (e.g., environmental groups, industry representatives),
has conducted an analysis of the potential impacts associat-
ed with applying the LDR treatment standards to Superfund
and RCRA Corrective Action cleanups. As a result of these
analyses, it was decided that they Agency will promulgate a
third set of treatment standards (in addition to the
wastewater and nonwastewater categories currently in effect)
specifically for soil and debris wastes. In the interim, there is
the presumption that CERCLA response actions involving the
placement of soil and debris contaminated with RCRA re-
stricted wastes will utilize a Treatability Variance to comply
with the LDRs and that, under these variances, the treatment
levels outlined in Superfund LDR Guide 6B will serve as al-
ternative 'treatment standards' for removal action. The guide
has been prepared to outline the process for obtaining and
complying with a Treatability Variance for soil and debris that
are contaminated with RCRA hazardous wastes until such
time that the Agency promulgates treatment standards for
soil and debris.

Subject index keywords: Debris, Superfund, Waste treat-
ment, Hazardous materials, Guidelines, Remedial action, Soil
contamination.

0431 Off-Site Policy: RFA or Equivalent Investigation
Requirement at RCRA Treatment and Storage Facilities

Order Number PB91-139295CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 4 Jan 88
The directive discusses the modification of RFA criterion
(need to have an RFA completed) for subtitle C treatment
and storage facilities. The requirements were phased in over
a period to end 6/1/88.

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Compliance With

Other Laws

Specifications: 7p.

Subject index keywords: Waste management, Superfund,

Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0432 Overview of Selected EPA (Environmental
Protection Agency) Regulations and Guidance Affecting
POTW (Publicly Owned Treatment Works) Management

Order Number PB90-129263CDH, price; PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
the Assistant Administrator for Water; Sep 89
The information in the document is meant only as a summary
of some of the regulations and guidance that may apply to
publicly owned treatment works (POTW) operations. The
document does not provide a comprehensive overview of all
applicable federal requirements. Use of the document should
not replace reference to official regulations as published in
the Federal Register or the Code of Federal Regulations or
to other more specific guidance documents. Also, the reader
should be aware that EPA continuously updates and revises
its regulations in response to statutory amendments or to im-
prove its regulatory program. Finally, POTWs are reminded
that the Clean Water Act allows states and municipalities to
impose more stringent requirements on National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permittees than are
required under federal law. Therefore, EPA suggests that the
reader contact the appropriate authorities to get sources of
detailed guidance for specific situations.

Specifications: 31 p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Sewers, In-
dustrial wastes, Pollution regulations, Publicly owned treat-
ment works, Toxic substances.

0433 Overview of the Off-Site Policy for OSCs and RPMs

Order Number PB92-963603CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 91
The fact sheet provides essential information for On Scene
Coordinators (OSCs) and Remedial Project Managers
(RPMs) for the implementation of the Off-site Policy, The fact
sheet includes an overview of the Policy, helpful reminders,
arid a list of the Regional Off-site contacts.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0434 PAST: The Potential ARARs Selection Tool

Order Number PB92-152941CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Computer Sciences Corp., Cincinnati, OH.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab; 1992

The 1986 Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act
(SARA) specified that any remedial actions at Superfund
sites must comply with applicable or relevant and appropriate
regulations (ARARS), including Federal, state, and local envi-
ronmental statutes. Identifying these legal requirements for a
particular hazardous waste site can be a complex and time
consuming process. The EPA Risk Reduction Engineering
Research Laboratory is developing a prototype knowledge-
based system to aid in screening regulations that determine

clean-up requirements based on unique site characteristics.
The decision logic follows that presented in the EPA docu-
ments such as CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws Manu-
als (Part I and II). Hence, it takes into consideration the
chemicals at the site, the particular location features of the
site, and the proposed remediations methods.

Specifications: Pub. in HMCRl's Annual National Confer-
ence Proceedings (12th), Hazardous Materials Control/Su-
perfund '92, December 3-5, 1991, Washington, DC., p632-
636. See also PB90-272535 and PB90-148461. Sponsored
by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab. 7p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Pollution regulations, Waste management, Remedial action,
Expert systems, Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate
Regulations, PAST system.

0435 Permits and Permit 'Equivalency' Processes for
CERCLA On-Site Response Actions

Order Number PB93-963325CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 19 Feb 92

The directive is intended to clarify the EPA policy with re-
spect to attaining permits for activities at Comprehensive En-
vironmental Response Compensation and Liability Act
(CERCLA) sites.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0436 Policy for Superfund Compliance with the RCRA
Land Disposal Restrictions

Order Number PB90-249640CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 17 Apr 89
The directive assists the regional removal and remedial staff
in making current site decisions about the Land Disposal Re-
strictions (LDR). The memorandum explains; (1) how to de-
termine when LDRs are 'applicable' to a Superfund removal
or remedial action, and (2) the Superfund approach for com-
plying with the LDRs when they are determined to be appli-
cable.

Specifications: 12p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Sites, Waste
management, Superfund, Land application, Remedial action,

0437 Policy on Floodplains and Wetland Assessments for
CERCLA Actions

Order Number PB91-921329CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 6 Aug 85
The directive discusses specific situations requiring prepara-
tion of a flood plains or wetlands assessment and the factors
to be considered in preparing such an assessment.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 15p.

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Compliance With
Other Laws

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0438 Summary of 'Notification of Out-of-state Shipments
of Superfund Site Wastes'

Order Number PB91-228197CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 91
The Fact Sheet summarizes EPA's policy that prior to the
off-site shipment of Superfund wastes to an out-of-state
waste management facility, EPA Regional Personnel will pro-
vide notice to the receiving state's environmental officials.
Specifications: 3p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0439 Superfund Guide to RCRA Management
Requirements for Mineral Processing Wastes

Order Number PB91-921318CDH, price: PC A01 /MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 91
The report summarizes recent revisions to the 1980 mining
waste exclusion, explains the potential effects of these revi-
sions on waste management options for mineral processing
wastes, and provides a general framework for managing min-
eral processing wastes at CERCLA sites in accordance with
RCRA land disposal restrictions (LDRs) and the recently pro-
mulgated toxicity characteristics (TC) rule.

Subject index keywords: Mining, Solid waste disposal, Re-
visions, Hazardous materials, Superfund, Mineral processing
wastes.

0440 Superfund LDR Guide No. 1: Overview of RCRA
Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs)

Order Number PB90-274325CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 89
The fact sheet summarizes the major components of the
LDR, outlines the types of restrictions imposed, and presents
the compliance options specified in the regulation.
Specifications: 7p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Guidelines,
Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Land disposal, Remedial action.

0441 Superfund LDR Guide No. 2: Complying with the
California List Restrictions under Land Disposal
Restrictions (LDRs)

Order Number PB90-274333CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 89
The fact sheet defines the California list of wastes, summa-
rizes their respective restrictions, and discusses their poten-
tial to overlap with other LDR treatment standards.
Specifications: 5p,

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Guidelines,
Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Land disposal, Remedial action.

0442 Superfund LDR Guide No. 3; Treatment Standards
and Minimum Technology Requirements under Land
Disposal Restrictions (LDRS)

Order Number PB90-274341CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 89
The fact sheet summarizes the types and effective dates of
treatment standards, and outlines procedures for compliance
with the treatment standards and minimum technology re-
quirements set during national capacity extensions.
Specifications: 7 p.

Subject Index keywords; Hazardous materials, Guidelines,
Waste treatment, Superfund, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Land disposal, Waste management.

0443 Superfund LDR Guide No. 4: Complying with the
Hammer Restrictions under Land Disposal Restrictions
(LDRs)

Order Number PB90-274358CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 89
The fact sheet discusses compliance with Land Disposal Re-
striction soft hammer and hard hammer provisions, which are
restrictions on the disposal of hazardous wastes if EPA does
not promulgate standards by relevant statutory deadlines.
Specifications: 7p.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Guidelines,
Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Remedial action, Land disposal.

0444 Superfund LDR Guide No. 5: Determining When
Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) Are 'Applicable' to
CERCLA Response Actions

Order Number PB90-274366CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 89
The fact sheet outlines the process used to determine
whether the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
(RCRA) LDRs established under the Hazardous Waste and
Solid Waste Amendments are 'applicable' to CERCLA re-
sponse actions.

Specifications: 7p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Guidelines,
Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Remedial response, Land disposal.

0445 Superfund LDR Guide No. 6A (2nd Edition)

Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatability Variance for
Remedial Actions

Order Number PB91-921327CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
The fact sheet outlines the process for obtaining and com-
plying with a Treatability Variance for soil and debris that are
contaminated with RCRA hazardous wastes until such time
that the Agency promulgates treatment standards for soil
and debris. In the interim before the Agency promulgates a
third set of treatment standards specifically for soil and
debris wastes, there is the presumption that CERCLA re-
sponse actions involving the placement of soil and debris
contaminated with RCRA restricted wastes will utilize a
Treatability Variance to comply with the LDRs. Treatment

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Community

Relations, State & Local, Tag Grants

levels outlined in the fact sheet will serve as alternative
'treatment standards'.

Subject index keywords; Superfund, Waste management,
Remedial action, Waste treatment, Soil treatment, Hazardous
materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response,
Treatability variance.

0446 Superfund LDR Guide No. 7. Determining When
Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) Are Relevant and
Appropriate to CERCLA Response Actions

Order Number PB91-214122CDH, price; PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 89
The Fact Sheet outlines the process used to determine
whether the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
(RCRA) land disposal restrictions (LDRs) established under
the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) are
'relevant and appropriate' to an on-site CERCLA response
action.

Specifications: See also PB91-921327. 4p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:

Community Relations, State & Local,
Tag Grants

0447 Analysis of State Superfund Programs: 50-State
Study

Order Number PB90-272733CDH, price: PC A10/MF A02
Environmental Law Inst., Washington, DC,; Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency
and Remedial Response; Sep 89

The report examines site cleanup capabilities in all 50 States
and provides descriptions of statutes, program organization,
findings, and cleanup procedures. Also provides snapshots
of state cleanup programs.

Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response. 225p.

Subject index keywords; States(United States), Hazardous
materials, Waste disposal, Superfund.

0448 Analysis of State Superfund Programs: 50-State
Study, 1990 Update

Order Number PB91-921259CDH, price: PC A11/MF A02
Environmental Law Inst., Washington, DC.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency
and Remedial Response; Sep 90

Updates a study initially conducted in 1989 by the Environ-
mental Law Institute for OERR. The study examines site
cleanup capabilities in all 50 States and provides descrip-
tions of statutes, program organization, funding and cleanup
procedures. This revised version also contains an analysis of
political subdivision involvement in the cleanup process. The
report provides detailed information for each State in a 'State

Summaries' chapter and in 50-State tables that facilitate
comparisons between States.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB90-272733. Sponsored
by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office
of Emergency and Remedial Response. 226p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, State programs, Re-
medial action, Hazardous materials, Waste management, Re-
medial response, US EPA Regions 1-10.

0449 Analysis of State Superfund Programs; 50-State
Study. 1991 Update

Order Number PB92-963418CDH, price; PC A12/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 91
Under the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act
(SARA) of 1986, Congress requires the EPA to involve
States in the Superfund program in a 'substantial and mean-
ingful" way. The State and Local Coordination Branch (SLCB)
is responsible for developing regulations, guidance, and
policy related to this Congressional mandate. As part of its
responsibilities, the SLCB tries to maintain comprehensive in-
formation about State capabilities to contribute to or manage
cleanups at hazardous waste sites. Under a cooperative
agreement with EPA, the Environmental Law Institute has
collected, organized, and summarized the information pre-
sented here on State cleanup programs.

Specifications: Paper Copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; alt others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB91-921259 and PB90-
272733. 267p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, State programs,
Waste management, Hazardous materials.

0450 Authority to Use CERCLA to Provide Enforcement
Funding Assistance to States

Order Number PB91-138909CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 12 Feb 86
The directive transmits February 13, 1886, Office of General
Counsel opinion to EPA Regional offices, authorizing
CERCLA funding of State negotiation and litigation activities
at NPL sites. See also directive no. 9831.3 'EPA State Rela-
tionship.'

Specifications; See also P891-138891 and PS91-138917.
5p.

Subject index keywords; Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0451 CERCLA Community Relations Mailing Lists

Order Number PB91-139527CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 6 Feb 89
The directive emphasizes the importance of using community
relations mailing lists to ensure the notification of potentially
responsible parties.

Specifications." 6p.

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Community Relations,
State & Local, Tag Grants

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response,

0452 Citizen's Guide to Air Sparging

Order Number PB92-235597CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 92
The Fact Sheet contains a description of air sparging; how it
works; why use this treatment method; will it always work;
where air sparging is being used; and how to get more infor-
mation on this treatment.

Specifications: 5p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Innovative treatment technologies, Air
sparging, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

0453 Citizen's Guide to Bioventing

Order Number PB92-235571CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 92
The Fact Sheet contains a description of bioventing; what it
is; how it works; why this type of treatment should be used;
will bioventing work on the site; where It is being selected;
and how to get more Information on the subject.
Specifications: 5p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Innovative treatment technologies, Soil
venting, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

0454 Citizen's Guide to Glycolate Dehalogenation

Order Number PB92-233105CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 92
Glycolate dehaloge nation is the process of using a chemical
reagent (a glycol in this case) to remove halogen from con-
taminants, consequently rendering them less hazardous. A
chemical reagent is a substance used to react with and
change another substance. This dehalogenation process can
be used on halogenated contaminants such as PCBs and
dioxins that may be found In soil and oils.

Specifications: 6p.

Subject index keywords: Glycols, Dehalogenation, Hazard-
ous materials.

0455 Citizen's Guide to How Innovative Treatment
Technologies Are Being Successfully Applied at
Superfund Sites

Order Number PB92-233071CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 92
Treatment technologies are processes applied to the treat-
ment of hazardous waste or contaminated materias, such as
soils, sludges, sediments and debris, to permanently alter
their condition through chemical, biological, or physical
means. They are used as an alternative to merely containing
the hazardous substances on site or in a hazardous waste
landfill that is designed and operated under the Federal Re-
source Conservation Recovery Act (RCRA) regulations.
Today, treatment technologies are being tailored to deal with
specific hazardous wastes.

Specifications*. 5p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment.

0456 Citizen's Guide to In situ Soil Flushing

Order Number PB92-233113CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 92
The Fact Sheet contains a description of what in situ soil
flushing is; how it works; why consider in situ soil flushing;
will soil flushing work at the site; where Is It being selected;
and how to obtain more information.

Specifications: 6p.

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Innovative treatment technologies,
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Soil flush-
ing.

0457 Citizen's Guide to Innovative Treatment
Technologies for Contaminated Soils, Sludges,

Sediments and Debris

Order Number PB92-235563GDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 92
The Fact Sheet contains what innovative treatment technol-
ogies are; why they are used; the different types; how the
treatment technologies are selected and which are used;
what happens of a technology does not work; where innova-
tive treatment technologies are being selected; why EPA is
encouraging the use of these treatments; and how more in-
formation can be obtained.

Specifications: 6p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Innovative treatment technologies,
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

0458 Citizen's Guide to Soil Washing

Order Number PB92-233097CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 92
Soil washing is a technology that uses liquids (sometimes
combined with chemical additives) and a mechanical process
to scrub soils. The scrubbing removes hazardous contami-
nants and concentrates them into smaller volume. After the
soil washing process is completed, the smaller volume of
soil, which contains the majority of the fine silt and clay parti-
cles, can be further treated by other methods (such as incin-
eration or bioremediation) or disposed of according to State
and Federal regulations.

Specifications: 6p.

Subject index keywords: Washing, Soil, Hazardous materi-
als.

0459 Citizen's Guide to Solvent Extraction

Order Number PB92-233089CDH, price; PC A01 /MF AQ1
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 92
Solvent extraction is a treatment technology that uses a sol-
vent (a fluid that can dissolve another substance) to sepa-
rate or remove hazardous organic contaminants from
sludges, sediments, or soil. Solvent extraction does not de-
stroy contaminants. It concentrates them so they can be re-
cycled or destroyed. It is used in combination with other
technologies to destroy the separated concentrated contami-
nants. When the soil enters an extractor (a tank where the
contaminated soil is mixed with the solvent), the soil is sepa-
rated into three components, or fractions: solvent with dis-

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Community
Relations, State & Local, Tag Grants

solved contaminants, solids, and water. Contaminants are
concentrated into each of these fractions. For example,
PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls) concentrate in the contami-
nated solvent mixture, while metals are left behind in the
solids and water.

Specifications: 5p.

Subject index keywords: Extraction, Solvents, Hazardous
materials, Waste treatment.

0460 Citizen's Guide to Thermal Desorption

Order Number PB92-232396CDH, price; PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 92
Thermal desorption is an innovative treatment technology
that treats soils contaminated with hazardous wastes by
heating the soil at realtivcly low temperatures (200-1000 deg
F) so that contaminants with low boiling points will vaporize
(turn into gas) and, consequently, separate from the soil.
There are three steps in thermal desorption: (1) heating the
soil to vaporize the contaminants; (2) treating the vaporized
contaminants; and (3) testing the treated soil.

Specifications: 6p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Soils, Waste
treatment.

0461 Citizen's Guide to Using Indigenous and Exogenous
Microorganisms in Bioremediation

Order Number PB92-235589CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 92
The Fact Sheet contains a description of bioremediation;
what indigenous and exogenous microorganisms are; how
these microorganisms are used; what sites can use these
microorganisms; and how to obtain more information.
Specifications: 5p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Innovative treatment technologies,
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Indigenous
microorganisms.

0462 Citizens' Guidance Manual for the Technical
Assistance Grant Program

Order Number PB91-238733CDH, price: PC A14/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Jun 88
The manual is designed to help citizens' groups apply for
and manage a technical assistance grant. It is written as a
self-help guide in an easy-to-understand manner. Step-by-
step instructions for completing various forms are included
throughout the manual. In addition, copies of blank forms
have been included for easy reference.

Specifications: 325p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Technical Assistance Grant Program.

0463 Citizens' Guidance Manual for the Technical
Assistance Grant Program

Order Number PB92-101435CDH, price: PC A14/MF A03
ICF Technology, inc., Fairfax, VA.; Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response; Jun 88

The Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of
1986 (SARA), which amended CERCLA, provides under sec-

tion 117(e) an important new component of EPA's communi-
ty relations activities at Superfund sites-technical assistance
grants to affected groups. The purpose of these grants is to
assist citizens' groups in understanding technical information
that assesses potential hazards and the selection and design
of appropriate response actions at Superfund sites. This
manual outlines Federal policies, procedures, and regulations
related to the Technical Assistance Grant Program and pro-
vides instructions on how to complete Federal grant forms. If
a State administers the Technical Assistance Grant Program,
the State may have additional procedures and requirements
that affect citizens' groups applying for grants within that
State. Groups, therefore, should contact the appropriate
State representative for specific information. This manual is
designed to help citizens' groups apply for and manage a
technical assistance grant. It is written as a self-help guide in
an easy-to-understand manner. Step-by-step instructions for
completing various forms are included throughout the
manual.

Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response. 320p.

Subject index keywords: Citizen participation, Technical as-
sistance, Manuals, Superfund, Hazardous materials, Waste
management, Technical Assistance Grant Program.

0464 Communicating with the Public About Hazardous
Materials: An Examination of Local Practice. Risk
Communication Series

Order Number PB90-235938CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Virginia Polytechnic inst. and State Univ., Blacksburg. Center
for Environmental and Hazardous Material Studies.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Policy, Planning and Evaluation; Apr 90
The study's purpose is to improve the ability of public and
private sector organizations to communicate with members
of the general public about the risks posed by hazardous ma-
terials, such as those found in Superfund or RCRA sites, or
subject to SARA Title III. The second phase included a na-
tional survey of Local Emergency Planning Committees
(LEPCs) and case studies of selected risk communication ef-
forts. The survey, conducted in a sample of ten states, was
designed to assess the risk communication efforts of LEPCs
and to gauge their capacity for promoting risk communication
in their communities. Case studies in three communities pro-
vide examples of risk communication efforts, with secondary
case studies in neighboring areas. The purpose was to learn
what risk communication techniques had been tried in these
cases, to secure suggestions for risk communication pro-
grams from practitioners, and to assess the level of hazard-
ous materials awareness among a sample of the attentive
public in each community.

Specifications: See also PB90-231200. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Policy, Planning and Evaluation. 118p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Risk, Emer-
gencies, Environmental exposure, Public education.

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Community Relations,
State & Local, Tag Grants

0465 Community Relations during Enforcement Activities
and Development of the Administrative Record

Order Number PB91-139519CDH, price: PC AQ3/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 3 Nov 88

The report discusses enforcement community relations. The
directive, which is Chapter VI of 'Community Relations in Su-
perfund: A Handbook,' discusses developing community rela-
tions plans, the relationship between the administrative
record for response selection and community relations, and
community relations during specific enforcement actions and
settlements.

Specifications: Final version of Chapter 6 for Community
Relations in Superfund: A Handbook. 31 p.

Subject index keywords: Community relations, Hazardous
materials, Superfund program.

0466 Community Relations during Enforcement Activities
and Development of the Administrative Record

Order Number PB92-105469CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 3 Nov 88
The directive discusses enforcement community relations.
The directive, which is Chapter VI of 'Community Relations in
Superfund: A Handbook,' discusses developing community
relations plans, the relationship between the administrative
record for response selection and community relations, and
community relations during specific enforcement actions and
settlements. The document supersedes directive number
9836.0 'interim Guidance on Community Relations in En-
forcement,' dated March 22, 1985, and directive number
9836.0-1 a 'Community Relations Activities at Superfund En-
forcement Sites," dated August 8,1985.

Specifications: 28p.

Subject index keywords: Waste management, Superfund,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

046? Community Relations in Superfund: A Handbook

Order Number PB92-963341CDH, price: PC A12/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 92
The Superfund community relations program promotes two-
way communication between members of the public, includ-
ing potentially responsible parties (PRPs), and the lead gov-
ernment agency in charge of response actions. The commu-
nity relations activities discussed in this Handbook provide
the opportunity for interested persons to comment on, and
provide input to, decisions about response actions. This
Handbook offers policy and guidance on planning and con-
ducting Superfund community relations programs. It empha-
sizes proven approaches and activities derived from years of
experience in conducting community relations in Superfund.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Supersedes PB89-180830. 268p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Community relations,
Waste management, Hazardous materials, Handbooks, Re-
medial response, Cleanup operations.

0468 Counting State-Lead Enforcement NPL Sites Toward
the CERCLA Section 116(e) Remedial Action Start
Mandate

Order Number PB91-138933CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 21 Oct 88
The directive outlines the criteria and procedures for count-
ing State-lead enforcement National Priorities List sites
toward the CERCLA section 116(e) remedial action start
mandate. The guidance supplements directive no. 9355.0-24
'OSWER Strategy for Management Oversight of the CERCLA
RA Start Mandate,' dated December 28,1987.
Specifications: See also PB91-138925. 7p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0469 Criminal Investigations and the Superfund Program

Order Number PB90-274499CDH, price: PC A01 /MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
The fact sheet, directed toward any one who witnesses
fraudulent activity in EPA programs, discusses areas in which
fraud and abuse can occur and provides an understanding of
the criminal investigation process that results from reports of
suspicious activity.

Specifications: 5p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Criminal in-
vestigations, Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, Pollution regulations,
Fraud.

0470 Debarment and Suspension

Order Number PB92-963331CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 91
The report defines debarment and suspension, and de-
scribes causes and procedures and authorities for pursuing
them. Also the study includes requirements of the Drug-Free
Work Place Act.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Supersedes PB90-272527. 4p,
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Federal law,
Funds, Pollution control, Superfund, Drug Free Work Place
Act.

0471 Enhancing State Superfund Capabilities: Nine-State
Study

Order Number PB91-242362CDH, price: PC A12/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response.; Environmental Law
Inst., Washington, DC; Dec 90

Nine (9) state hazardous substance cleanup programs were
studied in depth in 1989 to determine what elements of fund-
ing, enforcement, program organization and other factors are
important to state capabilities. Those studied were Colorado,
Illinois, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Caro-
lina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, and Texas. The states were se-
lected to provide a crass-section of large and small pro-
grams, new and older programs, geographic diversity, and
special program features. The findings of the study, prepared

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Community
Relations, State & Local, Tag Grants

by the Environmental Law Institute for the Office of Policy
Planning and Evaluation (OPPE), are reported in two parts.
Part One synthesizes the results across states and draws
conclusions concerning means of enhancing programs. Part
Two reports on each of the states studied and shows how
program features combine in the context of operating pro-
grams.

Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Environmental
Law Inst,, Washington, DC. 259p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, State programs, Cleanup operations.

0472 Ensuring the Adequacy of Cost Share Provisions in
Superfund State Contracts

Order Number PB93-963336CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 29 Mar 93
The memorandum requests regional offices to re-examine
existing Superfund State Contracts (SSCs) for Fund-financed
remedial actions to verify that they adequately reflect in-
curred and projected remedial action costs.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Contract management.

0473 Final Guidance on Administrative Records for
Selecting CERCLA Response Actions

Order Number PB91-139121CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 3 Dec 90
The directive sets forth the policy and procedures governing
the compilation and establishment of administrative records
for selecting response actions under CERCLA, as amended
by SARA. The directive supersedes no. 9833.3A 'Interim
Guidance on Administrative Records for Selection of
CERCLA Response Actions' dated May 29, 1987.
Specifications: Portions of this document are not fully legi-
ble. 11 Op.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0474 Funding of State Enforcement Related Activities

Order Number PB91-138891CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 23 Jan 85
The directive announces that funding can be provided to
support a limited number of enforcement related activities,
based on the July 20, 1985, Office of General Counsel opin-
ion. See also directive no. 9831.3a, 'CERCLA Funding of
State Enforcement Activities at NPL Sites - Interim Draft
Guidance,' dated October 1,1986.

Specifications: See also PB91-138909. 7p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Remedial action, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response.

0475 Guidance on Site Assessment Cooperative
Agreements

Order Number PB92-224385CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 91
The guidance on site assessment cooperative agreement
presents generic SMOA language pertaining to Site Assess-
ment activities, a generic quarterly report format, and generic
site assessment cooperative agreement application package.
In addition, the appendices provide additional sample sched-
ules, forms, and letters for developing a ate assessment co-
operative agreement.

Specifications: 40p.

Subject index keywords: Site surveys, State programs, US
EPA, Waste management, Superfund, Cooperative agree-
ments.

0476 Guide to Community involvement for Site
Assessment Managers

Order Number PB93-963348CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
The report includes information on community involvement
initiatives that can be taken during the technical phases of
site assessment and instructions on how to take these ac-
tions for hazardous wastes.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Community
relations, Sites, Pollution control.

0477 Interim Final Guidance Package on Funding
CERCLA State Enforcement Actions at NPL Sites

Order Number PB91-138917CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 7 Apr 88
The directive outlines requirements, conditions, and limita-
tions for State funding under a CERCLA cooperative agree-
ment of CERCLA enforcement actions at National Priorities
List sites. The guidance is divided into four subcomponents:
9831.6 a, b, c, and d. The directive supersedes directive no.
9831.1-1 a 'CERCLA Funding of State Oversight of Potentially
Responsible Parties (PRPs),' dated October 1, 1986, and di-
rective no. 9831.3 dated October 1, 1986 'CERCLA Funding
of State Enforcement Activities at NPL Sites,' - Interim Draft
Guidance.

Specifications: See also PB91-138909 and PB91-138925.
49p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0478 Obligation of Funds under Superfund State
Contracts

Order Number PB93-963326CDH, price: PC A01 /MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 5 Aug 93
The memorandum clarifies EPA's interpretation of 40 CFR
Part 35, Subpart O, regarding the relationship between cost
share assurances in Superfund State Contracts (SSCs) and
the obligation of remedial action funds. EPA's policy is that

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Community Relations,
State & Local, Tag Grants

remedial design monies may be obligated to another Federal
agency to initiate the procurement process for a remedial
action contract before an SSC is executed. However, the
memorandum also reiterates Agency policy that an SSC
must be in place before funds may be obligated for initiating
or continuing remedial action.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Contract management,
State government.

0479 Political Subdivision Involvement in Superfund

Order Number PB90-273954CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 90
The fact sheet provides guidance to Regions, States and po-
litical subdivisions on the designation of a political subdivi-
sion as the lead agency for remedial response under
CERCLA,

Specifications: 4p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Superfund,
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Waste
management, Remedial response.

0480 Political Subdivision Involvement in Superfund

Order Number PB92-96333GCDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 91
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
tion, and Liability Act (CERCLA), as amended, allows EPA to
provide funds to States, political subdivisions thereof, and
federally recognized Indian Tribes for Superfund response.
The definition of political subdivision varies from State to
State, since each State determines what units of government
meet its legislative definition. A political subdivision can par-
ticipate in Superfund cleanup as a lead or support agency
when EPA and the State agree that this enhances the clean-
up process and results in an efficient, economical, and well-
coordinated use of resources. To determine this, EPA and
the State assess the political subdivision's prior involvement
and agree that; The political subdivision is able to conduct
the response activities; It is economical and advantageous to
designate the political subdivision as lead; and The political
subdivision has the authority to enter into a Cooperative
Agreement with the Federal Government and to administer
Federal dollars.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Supersedes PB90-273954. 3p.
Subject index keywords: Funds, Hazardous materials, Pol-
lution control, Law(Jurisprudence), Superfund, Cleanup, Com-
prehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Li-
ability Act.

0481 Public Awareness Signs at Superfund Sites

Order Number PB91-921306CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 90
The Fact Sheet is designed to inform individuals involved in
the Superfund program about the need to post signs at every
Superfund site, Superfund sites have been and will continue

to be of interest and concern to people in surrounding com-
munities and to the public in general. Through the posting of
signs at each site, the Superfund program can work to pro-
mote continued interaction with communities as well as
assure that interested parties can access information or
report unusual or criminal activities.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of-Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Signs.

0482 Questions and Answers About the State Role in
Remedy Selection at Non-Fund-Financed Enforcement
Sites

Order Number PB91-187039CDH, price; PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 18 Apr 91
The directive describes circumstances under which States
may select and implement a remedy at NPL sites without
first obtaining EPA concurrence.

Specifications: 7p.

Subject index keywords: Waste management, Superfund,
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

0483 Reporting and Exchange of Information on State
Enforcement Actions at National Priorities List Sites

Order Number PB91-138883CDH, price; PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 14 Mar 86
The directive outlines need for EPA Headquarters reporting
and exchange of information on State-lead enforcement sites
in order to facilitate Federal oversight and review of State ac-
tions. The memorandum has two attachments: (1) results of
a survey on current State-lead enforcement data on EPA
systems, and (2) a list of additional data requirements that
should be addressed.

Specifications: S@© also PB91-138891. 18p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0484 Revised Interim Final Guidance on Indian
Involvement in the Superfund Program

Order Number PB90-249723CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 28 Nov 89
The directive supplements and references existing documen-
tation for EPA Regional personnel and highlights issues spe-
cific to the involvement of federally recognized Indian tribes
in the Superfund program.

Specifications: 17p.

Subject index keywords: Regulations, Superfund, Remedial
action, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response,
American Indians.

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Community
Relations, State & Local, Tag Grants

0485 Role of Community Interviews in the Development
of a Community Relations Program for Remedial
Response

Order Number PB90-273756CDH, price; PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 15 Jun 90
The directive offers guidance in response to recent Regional
Office questions regarding the community relations interviews
required by the National Contingency Plan.

Specifications: 5p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Interviews,
Superfund, Community relations, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Waste management, Remedial re-
sponse, Citizen participation.

0486 Superfund Desk Reference for Municipalities

Order Number PB91-193409CDH, price: PC A21/MF A04
PRC Environmental Management, Inc., McLean, VA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 91
The manual is a compilation of existing documents relating
to municipalities and Superfund. The manual's purpose is to
assist municipalities who have been or might be identified as
potentially responsible parties (PRPs) to work through the
Superfund process. It will also be useful to those municipali-
ties who are not PRPs, but who may otherwise have an inter-
est in a Superfund site.

Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response. 488p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Manuals, Municipal wastes.

0487 Superfund Fact Sheet: An Overview

Order Number PB93-963311CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 92
The fact sheet provides an overview of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act,
commonly known as Superfund. The overview includes infor-
mation on types of response action, cleanup strategy and
past accomplishments. The fact sheet is one in a series pro-
viding reference information about Superfund issues and is
intended for readers with no formal scientific training.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.

Subject index keywords: Waste disposal, Hazardous mate-
rials, Pollution laws, Superfund.

0488 Superfund Fact Sheet: Arsenic

Order Number PB93-963305CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
. Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 92
The fact sheet describes arsenic (chemical symbol As), how
and where it occurs both naturally and artificially, and how it
can get into the body and affect human health. The fact
sheet is one in a series providing reference information about
Superfund issues and is intended for readers with no formal
scientific training.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,

and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.

Subject index keywords: Arsenic, Pollution, Chemical prop-
erties, Superfund.

0489 Superfund Fact Sheet: Benzene

Order Number PB93-963308CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 92

The fact sheet describes benzene, a chemical that can be
found in a variety of products, including petroleum products
(e.g. gasoline), some household cleaners, and some glues
and adhesives. Explanations of how people are exposed to
benzene and how benzene can enter the body and may
affect human health are given. The fact sheet is one in a
series providing reference information about Superfund
issues and is intended for readers with no formal scientific
training.

Subject Index keywords: Benzene, Hazardous materials,
Environmental exposure, Superfund.

0490 Superfund Fact Sheet: Community Interviews

Order Number PB93-963312CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 92

The fact sheet describes the interview program used by the
EPA to develop the Community Relations Plan, a program
designed to keep people informed about cleanup activities at
the contaminated site in their community. In the interview
program, questions, concerns, and additional information are
collected from people in the community to determine the
community already knows and/or wants to know about the
cleanup site and what will be done at the site. The fact sheet
is one in a series providing reference information about Su-
perfund issues and is intended for readers with no formal sci-
entific training.

Subject index keywords: Waste disposal, Hazardous mate-
rials, Interviews, Surveys, Superfund.

0491 Superfund Fact Sheet: Identifying Sites

Order Number PB93-963314CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 92
The fact sheet describes the EPA's criteria and process for
identifying potential Superfund cleanup sites. Explanations of
how a site is reviewed for the National Priorities List and
what risk assessments factors are considered for ranking the
site on the list are given. The fact sheet is one in a series
providing reference information about Superfund issues and
is intended for readers with no formal scientific training.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p,

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Community Relations,
State & Local, Tag Grants

Subject index keywords: Waste disposal, Hazardous mate-
rials, Site selection, Site surveys, Superfund.

0492 Superfund Fact Sheet: PCSs

Order Number PB93-963309CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 92
The fact sheet describes polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs),
where PCBs can be found and how they can enter the body
and affect human health. The fact sheet is one in a series
providing reference information about Superfund issues and
is intended for readers with no formal scientific training.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.

Subject index keywords: Environmental exposure, Hazard-
ous materials, Polychlorinated biphenyls, Superfund.

0493 Superfund Fact Sheet: Public Involvement

Order Number PB93-963313CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 92
The fact sheet describes how citizens can participate in the
decision-making process regarding Superfund activities in
their communities. Explanations of how citizens can report
potential Superfund sites, address public health hazards from
both the site itself and cleanup activities, and provide input
to limit the effects of the cleanup on their communities are
given. The fact sheet is one in a series providing reference
information about Superfund issues and is intended for read-
ers with no formal scientific training.

Subject index keywords: Waste disposal, Hazardous mate-
rials, Citizen participation, Superfund.

0494 Superfund Fact Sheet: The Remedial Program

Order Number PB93-963315CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 92
The fact sheet describes what various actions the EPA can
take to clean up hazardous wastes sites. Explanations of
how the criteria for environmental and public health risk as-
sessment are determined and the role of state and local gov-
ernments in site remediation are given. The fact sheet is one
in a series providing reference information about Superfund
issues and is intended for readers with no formal scientific
training.

Subject index keywords: Waste disposal, Hazardous mate-
rials, Superfund.

0495 Superfund Fact Sheet: The Removal Program

Order Number PB93-963310CDH, price: PC AQ2/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 92
The fact sheet describes the Superfund Emergency Re-
sponse Program, a program specifically designed to respond

to multi-media hazardous materials accidents (e.g. illegal dis-
posal or improper handling of materials, transportation acci-
dents, chemical fires) that endanger people and/or the envi-
ronment. Explanations of how the removal program works
and how the affected communities are involved are given.
The fact sheet is one in a series providing reference informa-
tion about Superfund issues and is intended for readers with
no scientific training.

Subject index keywords: Waste disposal, Hazardous mate-
rials, Pollution control, Superfund.

0496 Superfund Fact Sheet: Trichloroethytene

Order Number PB93-963307CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 92
The fact sheet describes trichloroethytene (TCE), a chemical
that can be found in a variety of products, including some
glues, paints and paint removers, and spot removers and
cleaners. Explanations of how TCE can get into the body
and how it can affect human health are given. The fact sheet
is one in a series providing reference information about Su-
perfund issues and is intended for readers with no formal sci-
entific training.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Environmen-
tal exposure, Ethytene/trichloro, Superfund.

0497 Superfund Information Repositories and
Administrative Records: Introduction for Librarians

Order Number PB92-963621CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 92
The fact sheet discusses two features of EPA's Superfund
Community Relations Program: the information repository
and the administrative record. The fact sheet describes the
types of information usually contained in the information re-
pository and administrative record and describes what is in-
volved in acting as an information repository librarian.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 8p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Information
centers, Records management, Superfund, Repositories.

0498 Superfund: Qualified Disadvantaged Business
Utilization in State Response

Order Number PB92-963283CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Apr 92
The fact sheet concentrates on Disadvantaged Business En-
terprise utilization in cases where States are managing the
cleanup of National Priority List sites, It introduces the Super-
fund process, focuses on disadvantaged business enterprise
participation and involvement in state Superfund programs,

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Community

Relations, State & Local, Tag Grants

provides a regulatory context for contracting practices, and
offers additional information sources.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0499 Superfund Technical Assistance Grant (TAG)
Handbook

Order Number PB91-238592CDH, price: PC A12/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 90

The handbook is designed to guide the reader through the
entire Technical Assistance Grant (TAG) Program, from ap-
plying for the grant to selecting a technical advisor and man-
aging a TAG project. The handbook explains federal policies,
procedures, and regulations related to the TAG Program and
provides detailed instructions on how to complete necessary
grant forms. The handbook is intended for those who have
already submitted a Letter of Intent.

Specifications: 268p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Technical Assistance Grant Program.

0500 Superfund Technical Assistance Grant (TAG)
Handbook: Applying for Your Grant

Order Number PB93-963352CDH, price:

Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
The Technical Assistance Grant (TAG) Program provides
funds for qualified citizens' groups affected by a Superfund
site to hire independent technical advisors to help interpret
and comment on site-related information. The booklet ex-
plains the basic program requirements that your group must
meet to be eligible for a TAG and to successfully complete a
TAG application. The TAG Program is governed by certain
regulations, which are paraphrased throughout the booklet.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB93-963353. 24p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Financial assistance,
Information dissemination.

0501 Superfund Technical Assistance Grant (TAG)
Handbook: The Application Forms with Instructions

Order Number PB93-963353CDH, price:

Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
Contents; Sample Application Forms with Instructions; Letter
of Intent; Standard Form 424 - General Information; Stand-
ard Form 424A -- Budget Information; Standard Form 424B --
Assurances; Project Narrative Statement; Certification Re-
garding Debarment; Drug Free Workplace Certification; Certi-
fication Regarding Lobbying; Attachments; Attachment 1.A. -
Statement of Work; Attachment 1.B. - Proposed Schedule of
Tasks and Costs for Technical Advisors; and Attachment
1 C, - Detailed Budget.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB93-963352.110p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Financial assistance,
Information dissemination.

0502 Superfund Technical Assistance Grants

Order Number PB90-273772CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 90
The fact sheet provides background and basic information
on the Technical Assistance Grant (TAG) program, which
provides funds for qualified citizen's groups to hire independ-
ent technical advisors to help them understand and com-
ment on technical factors in cleanup decisions affecting
them at nearby sites.

Specifications: See also PB90-194721. 9p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Superfund,
Technical Assistance Grant Program, Waste management,
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Remedial
action.

0503 Superfund Technical Assistance Grants (Fact Sheet)

Order Number PB93-963301CDH, price:

Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
An important aspect of the Superfund program is citizen in-
volvement at the local level in decision making that relates to
site-specific cleanup actions. Recognizing the importance of
community involvement and the need for citizens living near
NPL sites to be well informed, Congress included provisions
in SARA to establish a Technical Assistance Grant (TAG)
Program, intended to promote public involvement in deci-
sions on site-specific cleanup strategies under Superfund.
The TAG Program provides funds for qualified citizens'
groups affected by a Superfund site to hire independent
technical advisors to help them understand and comment on
site-related information, and thus participate in cleanup deci-
sions.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Remedial action, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Re-
sponse, Technical Assistance Grant Program.

0504 Superfund Technical Assistance Grants Program:
Regional Guidance Manual

Order Number PB90-194721 CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
ICF, Inc., Fairfax, VA.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response; Jul 88

Section 117(e) of the Comprehensive Environmental Re-
sponse, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA),
as amended, states that technical assistance grants can be
made to 'any group of individuals which may be affected by
a release or threatened release at any facility which is listed
on the National Priorities List (NPL)' Affected groups eligible
for technical assistance grants are those that can demon-
strate, among other things, that their members face actual or
potential health, economic, or environmental threats arising

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

from a release or threatened release at a facility listed on the
NPL or proposed for listing where a response action Is un-
derway. CERCLA, as amended, authorizes a maximum tech-
nical assistance grant of up to $50,000 per site for the dura-
tion of site response activities. Citizens' groups are required
to provide matching funds. Only one grant may be awarded
for any eligible NPL site. If more than one group intends to
apply for the available grant at a site, the groups should be
encouraged to consolidate and submit one application.
Grants will be used for the purpose of obtaining technical as-
sistance to interpret information related to Superfund re-
sponse activities at a site.

Specifications: Also pub. as OSWER DIRECTIVE-9230.1-
04, Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Wash-
ington, DC, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response.
94p.

Subject index keywords: Pollution control, Hazardous ma-
terials, Grants, Superfund program.

0505 Superfund Technical Assistance Grants (TAGs)
(Pamphlet)

Order Number PB93-963302CDH, price:

Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) believes it is im-
portant for communities to be involved in decisions related to
nearby Superfund sites. For this reason, community outreach
activities are underway at each of the 1,200 sites on the Na-
tional Priorities List (NPL). Congress established the Techni-
cal Assistance Grant (TAG) Program in 1986 to help affected
communities understand and comment on site-related infor-
mation, and thus participate in cleanup decisions.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche, Sp,

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Remedial action, Technical Assistance Grant Program.

0506 Supporting State Attorneys General CERCLA
Remedial and Enforcement Activities at NPL Sites

Order Number PB91-138925CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 21 Jun 88
The directive reaffirms rote of State-lead agency for award of
cooperative agreements, and states that funds can nonethe-
less be available to State attorneys genera) via pass through
from the lead agency. Describes the three types of coopera-
tive agreements that can be passed through the State-lead
agency to the State Attorney General, The guidance supple-
ments directives no. 9831.8a-6d 'Interim Final Guidance
Package on Funding CERCLA State Enforcement Actions at
NPL Sites,' dated April 7, 1988.

Specifications: See also PB91-138933 and PB91-138917.
10p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response,

0507 Understanding Bioremediation: A Guidebook for
Citizens

Order Number PB93-205870CDH, price: PC AQ3/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 91
Bioremediation - a process that uses microorganisms to
transform harmful substances to nontoxic compounds - is
one of the most promising new technologies for treating
chemical spills and hazardous waste problems. In order to
improve the technology and better understand its capabili-
ties, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is en-
couraging field tests and evaluation of waste site cleanups
using bioremediation. As bioremediation is considered more
frequently as a cleanup alternative, citizens need information
about this process to help them contribute to informed deci-
sion-making regarding the cleanup of waste sites in their
communities. The brochure answers some questions about
what bioremediation is, where it can be used effectively, and
its advantages and disadvantages.

Specifications: See also PB90-216466, PB92-235589 and
PB93-116143. 23p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment, Biological treatment.

0508 Understanding Superfund Risk Assessment

Order Number PB92-963372CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 92
The fact sheet explains the Superfund risk assessment proc-
ess in non-technical terms, defining risk assessment and risk
management, and describing the four steps of risk assess-
ment. Information is also provided on how the public can get
more involved in Superfund risk assessment and suggestions
for further reading.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Enforcement

0509 Accelerating Potentially Responsible Party Remedial
Design Starts: Implementing the 30-Day Study

Order Number PB92-963608CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Apr 92
The directive encourages the regions to use all available op-
portunities to obtain Potentially Responsible Party (PRP) start
of the Remedial Design (RD) prior to entry of a Consent
Decree. At a minimum, the RD should start at lodging of the
Consent Decree. Where appropriate, regions should have the
RD start even earlier, as soon after signature of the Record
of Decision (ROD) as possible.

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response,

0510 Administrative Order on Consent for Remedial
Investigations/Feasibility Study

Order Number PB91-139378CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 5 Feb 90
The directive provides a mode! order that is designed to re-
place the outdated model order that was issued prior to the
CERCLA amendments. The model order is designed to facili-
tate settlement negotiations by serving as an opening hand-
position, and to facilitate national consistency. The directive
supersedes directive no. 9835.3 'Model Administrative Order
for Private Party Conduct for RI/FSs,' dated January 31,
1985, and supplements directive no. 9835.8 'Model State-
ment of Work for Remedial Investigations and Feasibility
Study Conducted by Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs),'
dated June 2, 1989.

Specifications: 34p.

Subject index keywords: Remedial action, Superfund,
Waste management, Hazardous materials, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response.

0511 Administrative Penalty Procedures

Order Number PB92-101963CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1991
The directive discusses administrative penalty procedures.
The rule provides that the administrative assessment of
CERCLA Section 109 penalties and EPCRA Section 325
penalties will be governed by EPA's Consolidated Rules of
Practice Governing the Administrative Assessment of Civil
Penalties and by supplemental rules relating specifically to
penalty assessments under Section 109 of CERCLA and
Section 325 of EPCRA.

Specifications: 8p.

Subject index keywords; Hazardous materials, Waste man-
agement, Superfund, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0512 Arbitration Procedures for Small Superfund Cost
Recovery Claims

Order Number PB92-102045CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 22 May 89
The directive implements EPA's authority under Section
122(h)(2) of CERCLA, which authorizes the head of any de-
partment or agency with authority to undertake a response
action under CERCLA to use arbitration as a method of set-
tling CERCLA Section 107(a) claims for recovery of response
costs incurred by the U.S. pursuant to Section 104 of
CERCLA,

Specifications: 18p.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Superfund,
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0513 BEN; A Model to Calculate the Economic Benefit of
Noncompliance. User's Manual

Order Number PB92-230358CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
Industrial Economics, Inc., Cambridge, MA.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of Enforcement;
1 Oct 92

The Agency developed the BEN computer model to calculate
the economic benefit a violator derives from delaying or
avoiding compliance with environmental statutes. In general,
the Agency uses the BEN computer model to assist its own
staff in developing settlement penalty figures. While the pri-
mary purpose of the BEN model is to calculate the economic
benefit of noncompliance, the model may also be used to
calculate the after tax net present value of a pollution pre-
vention or mitigation project and to calculate 'cash outs' in
Superfund cases. The document, the BEN User's Manual,
contains all the formulas that make up the BEN computer
model and is freely available to the public upon request.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Enforcement. 168p.
Subject index keywords: Pollution abatement, Computer-
ized simulation, Benefit cost analysis, Penalties, Standards
compliance, BEN model.

0514 BEN Model: Calculates Violators' Economic Benefits
from Noncompliance (Version 4,0) (for Microcomputers)

Order Number PB94-500998CDH, price; Diskette $140.00
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Enforcement; Dec 93

The model calculates the economic benefit that a company
gains by delaying payment necessary for compliance with
environmental regulations or permits. While the primary pur-
pose of the BEN model is to calculate the economic benefit
of EPA regulation noncompliance, the model may also be
used to calculate the after tax net present value of a pollu-
tion prevention or mitigation project. BEN is not limited to
just environmental regulations; rather, it is a cost analysis
model that presents savings from delaying or avoiding any
expenditures. Users are taken through a series of prompts to
enter specified costs including initial capital investments,
nondepreciable expenditures, annual expenses, dates of
compliance and noncompliance, date of penalty payment,
useful life of pollution control equipment, income tax rates,
inflation rate, and discount rate. The savings from not paying
are then calculated.

Specifications: The software Is on one 3 1/2 inch diskette,
720K double density. Documentation included; may be or-
dered separately as PB94-141652. Will be updated in August
1994. System: DOS operating system. Requires 232K of hard
drive space. Is menu driven. 1 diskette.

Subject index keywords: Pollution abatement, Benefit cost
analysis, Software.

0515 CASHOUT User's Manual for Superfund

Order Number PB94-141678CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Industrial Economics, Inc., Cambridge, MA.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Enforcement;
Sep 92

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) developed
the Superfund CASHOUT computer model to calculate the
present value of the cleanup costs at Superfund sites that
the government needs to collect from potentially responsible
parties (PRPs). The CASHOUT computer model will assist

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

EPA staff in developing settlement figures for Superfund de
minimis settlements, commonly referred to as 'cash outs'. De
minimis settlements entail the early release from liability of
certain contributors at a Superfund site after they pay their
fair share of the total cleanup costs. Thus, calculating the
present value of cleanup costs using the CASHOUT comput-
er model is generally the first step in 'cashing out' PRPs in-
volved in a de minimis settlement. The 'present value' of
future costs reflects the fact that a dollar today is different
(i.e., worth more) than a dollar tomorrow. Cleanup costs to
be incurred in the future need to be restated in terms of
today's dollars to 'cash out' PRPs. Using the present value
of the total cleanup costs, Agency staff can develop a basis
from which they can estimate each de minimis contributor's
share of the total cleanup costs.

Specifications: For system on diskette, see PB94-501012.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
DC. Office of Enforcement. 78p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Costs, User
manuals(Computer programs).

0516 CERCLA Enforcement Policy Compendium Update

Order Number PB92-963623CDH, price: PC$98.00
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Sep 92
The compendium is a compilation of documents originated
by the Office of Waste Programs Enforcement, CERCLA En-
forcement Division. Documents contained in the 1992 com-
pendium were issued after August 14, 1990 and are related
to CERCLA Enforcement The compendium also consists of
documents originated by the Office of Enforcement and
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 903p.

Subject index keywords: Waste management, Hazardous
materials, Law enforcement, Superfund.

0517 CERCLA Implementation of Inspector Training
Requirements for OSCs/RPMs at the Intermediate Level
in STEP and First-Line Supervisors

Order Number PB91-187021CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 3 Apr 91
The directive provides guidance on how two groups of
CERCLA staff can meet or be excepted from the training re-
quirements of EPA Order 3500.1 Inspector Training.
Specifications: 7p.

Subject index keywords: Personnel development, Super-
fund, Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emer-
gency Response, Structured Training and Evaluation Pro-
gram.

0518 CERCLA Implementation of the Training
Requirements of EPA Order 3500.1. Inspector Training

Order Number PB91-139659CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 19 Oct 89
The purpose of the directive is to explain how On-Scene Co-
ordinators (OSCs) and Remedial Project Managers (RPMs)
may satisfy the requirements for Inspector Training under
EPA Order 3500.1, or may be granted an exemption from
those requirements. An exemption may be granted depend-

ing on the implementation of the Structured Training and
Evaluation Program (STEP). STEP is a key component of the
OSC/RPM Support Program created by OSWER. Depending
on the various levels in STEP - Basic, Intermediate, Ad-
vanced or Master - to which an OSC/RPM is assigned, an
exemption may be granted from the training requirements of
the Order.

Specifications: 19p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Personnel development, Office of Solid
Wastes and Emergency Response.

0519 Comparative Analysis of Remedies Selected in the
Superfund Program during FY 87, FY 88 and FY 89

Order Number PB91-139477CDH, price; PC A09/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 20 Jun 90
The directive determines if there are differences between
remedies selected at Fund-lead and Enforcement-lead sites.
For the bulk of the analysis, sites whose remedial investiga-
tion/feasibility study (RI/FS) was conducted with Superfund
money (Fund-lead) were compared with those whose RI/FS
was conducted by potentially responsible parlies (PRPs) (En-
forcement-lead). In addition, sites whose remedial design/re-
medial action (RD/RA) is expected to be conducted by PRPs
were compared with sites where the Fund was expected to
conduct RD/RA. The latter comparison was developed to
consider potential influence where PRPs do not conduct the
RI/FS, but offer or are expected to conduct the RD/RA.
Specifications: 179p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Superfund,
Waste management, Remedial action, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response.

0520 Consent Orders and the Reimbursement Provision
Under Section 106(b) of CERCLA

Order Number PB91-139113CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 12 Jun 87
The directive provides guidance regarding terms of consent
orders to preclude parties who have signed consent agree-
ments to subsequently seek reimbursement under section
106(b) of CERCLA.

Specifications: Portions of this document are not fully legi-
ble. 6p,

Subject Index keywords: Waste management, Superfund,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0521 Consultation on Records of Decision (RODS) for
Containment-Only Remedies

Order Number PB91-228734CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 2 Oct 90
The directive provides Regions with implementation strategy
for RODs involving containment.

Specifications: 5p,

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0522 Coordination of EPA and State Actions in Cost
Recovery

Order Number PB91-138974CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 29 Aug 83
The directive outlines considerations for promoting Federal/
State relations in their respect cost recovery efforts. Also
provides guidance on preparing conditions to cooperative
agreements.

Specifications: Portions of this document are not fully legi-
ble. 24p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0523 Cost Recovery Actions/Statute of Limitations

Order Number PB91-138982CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 12 Jun 87
The directive updates EPA's policy on timing of cost recov-
ery action. The directive requests EPA staff to focus atten-
tion on the accuracy of data being used to brief Congress on
the status of cost recovery efforts at sites. In addition, the
directive encourages the initiation of cost recovery action for
those sites where the Statute of Limitations date is ap-
proaching. The directive supercedes directive no, 9832.3,
'Timing of CERCLA Cost Recovery Actions,' dated October
7, 1985.

Specifications: 6p.

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response,

0524 Cost Recovery Actions under CERCLA

Order Number PB91-138966CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 26 Aug 83
The directive describes the essential elements that the gov-
ernment will probably be called upon to prove in a cost re-
covery action: the assembly and maintenance of a file, some
examples of appropriate documentation for each element of
the cause of action, procedures for processing and negotiat-
ing cost recovery claims, and the mechanics of repayment of
any recovery to the Fund.

Specifications: 104p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0525 Cost Recovery Referrals

Order Number PB91-138941CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 3 Aug 83
The directive discusses procedures for Regional staff in han-
dling and documenting upcoming section 107 cost recovery
referrals in order to meet Department of Justice require-
ments, in a memorandum dated August 3, 1983. A second
memorandum, dated September 5,1983, is attached that fur-
ther clarifies the earlier memorandum. A partial list of docu-
ments needed to support cost recovery is attached to the
second memorandum. These memoranda are supplemented
by directive no. 9832,0-1 a, which used to be directive no,
9832,4.

Specifications: See also PB91-138958. 7p.

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0526 Covenants Not to Sue under SARA

Order Number PB91-139220CDH, price: PC AG3/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 10 Jul 87
The report updates the Interim Settlement Policy by providing
guidance on the implementation of the mandatory and dis-
cretionary provisions of SARA in relation to the use of cov-
enants not to sue in consent decrees. Attached to the guid-
ance is a model covenant not to sue.

Specifications: 27p.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment, Liabilities, Superfund Amendments and Reauthoriza-
tion Act, Cleanup.

0527 Endangerment Assessment Guidance

Order Number PB91-139675CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 21 Oct 85
The directive clarifies the requirement that an endangerment
assessment be developed to support all administrative and
judicial enforcement actions under Section 106 of the Com-
prehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Li-
ability Act (CERCLA) and Section 7003 of the Resource Con-
servation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Before taking enforce-
ment action under these provisions to abate the hazards or
potential hazards at a site, the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) must be able to properly document and justify
its assertion that an imminent and substantial endangerment
to public health or welfare or the environment may exist. The
endangerment assessment provides the documentation and
justification. The endangerment assessment is not necessary
to support Section 104 actions. It also provides guidance on
the content, timing, level of detail, format, and resources re-
quired for the preparation of endangerment assessments.
Specifications: Portions of this document are not fully legi-
ble. 13p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Endangerment assessment

0528 Endangerment Assessment Guidance

Order Number PB92-101997CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 22 Nov 85
The directive clarifies the requirement that an endangerment
assessment be developed to support all administrative and
judicial enforcement actions under Section 106 of the Com-
prehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Li-
ability Act (CERCLA) and Section 7003 of the Resource Con-
servation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Before taking enforce-
ment action under these provisions to abate the hazards or
potential hazards at a site, the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) must be able to properly document and justify
its assertion that an imminent and substantial endangerment
to public health or welfare or the environment may exist. The
endangerment assessment provides this documentation and
justification. The endangerment assessment is not necessary
to support Section 104 actions. It also provides guidance on

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

the content, timing, level of detail, format, and resources re-
quired for the preparation of endangerment assessments.
Specifications: See also PB92-102144. 20p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste man-
agement, Superfund, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0529 Endangerment Assessment Handbook

Order Number PB91-139683CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 22 Nov 85
The directive provides guidance on how to develop an en-
dangerment assessment and discusses the (evel of detail
that is required. It also addresses how the assessment may
be affected by various site-specific enforcement concerns.
Specifications: Portions of this document are not fully legi-
ble. 141 p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0530 Endangerment Assessment Handbook

Order Number PB92-102144CDH, price: PC A13/MF A03
PRC Engineering, Inc., Chicago, IL.; Life Systems, Inc.,
Cleveland, OH.'Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, DC. Office of Waste Programs Enforcement;
Aug 85

Current U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) policy
states that an endangerment assessment is required to sup-
port all administrative and judicial enforcement actions under
Section 106(a) of the Comprehensive Environmental Re-
sponse, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA)
and Section 7003 of the Resource Conservation and Recov-
ery Act of 1976 (RCRA). This Handbook provides guidance
to EPA regional, state and contractor personnel on conduct-
ing endangerment assessments and preparing the necessary
documentation. Its primary purpose is to assist individuals in
the preparation of endangerment assessment documents
which will satisfy the enforcement needs of each case. The
Handbook explains the use of the endangerment assess-
ment as an enforcement tool and its relationship to the re-
medial investigation (Rl) and feasibility study (FS) processes
at a site. It provides guidance on how to develop an endan-
germent assessment and discusses the timing, scope and
level of detail that are required and how these factors may
be affected by site-specific enforcement concerns.
Specifications: Also pub. as Life Systems, Inc., Cleveland,
OH. rept. no. TR-693-24B. See also PB92-101997. Prepared
in cooperation with Life Systems, Inc., Cleveland, OH. Spon-
sored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Office of Waste Programs Enforcement. 278p.

Subject index keywords: Risk assessment, Hazardous ma-
terials, Waste management, Superfund, Handbooks, Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement.

0531 Enforcement Project Management Handbook

Order Number PB90-780115CDH, price: PC A22/MF A03
Booz-Allen and Hamilton, Inc., Bethesda, MD.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response; Jul 89

The publication is a basic reference and training manual to
assist EPA Superfund field personnel (Remedial Project Man-
agers and On Scene Coordinators) in planning, negotiating
and managing potentially responsible party (PRP) searches

and PRP-lead actions at Superfund sites. It provides an over-
view of each phase of the Superfund enforcement process
and discusses specific roles and responsibilities of the RPM/
OSC in the process.

Specifications: See also PB87-183133 and P887-183141.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
DC. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. 508p.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal.

0532 Enforcement Project Management Handbook

Order Number PB91-186999CDH, price: PC A23/MF A03
Booz-Allen and Hamilton, Inc., Bethesda, MD.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response; Jan 91

The handbook has been prepared as a basic reference and
training manual to assist RPMs (Remedial Project Managers)
and OSCs (On-Scene Coordinators) in planning, negotiating
and managing various enforcement actions.

Specifications: Supersedes PB90-780115. Sponsored by
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response. 538p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal.

0533 Enforcement Project Management Handbook

Order Number PB93-963602CDH. price: PC A18/MF A04
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; May 93
The Handbook is intended to be a basic reference and train-
ing manual to assist Remedial Project Managers (RPMs) and
On-Scene Coordinators (OSCs) in planning, negotiating, and
managing Potentially Responsible Party (PRP) searches and
PRP-lead actions. It provides an overview of each phase of
the enforcement process and discusses specific roles and
responsibilities of the RPM/OSC in the process. Procedures
and information contained in the document are based on ex-
isting and draft EPA policy and guidance. Specific documents
are referenced as sources of additional information on par-
ticular topics.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Supersedes PB91-186999. 404p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal.

0534 Entry and Continued Access under CERCLA

Order Number PB91-138867CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 5 Jun 87
The directive describes EPA's policy on entry and continued
access to facilities by EPA officers, employees, and repre-
sentatives for purposes of response and civil enforcement
activities under CERCLA. The policy recommends that EPA
should seek to obtain access through consent.
Specifications: See also PB91-138859. 18p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0535 Environmental Compliance Branch, Standard
Operating Procedures and Quality Assurance Manual,
Revision 1

Order Number PB91-233650CDH, price: PC A19/MF A04
Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, GA.

Environmental Services Div; 1 Feb 91
The document contains the field procedures developed by
US-EPA, Region IV, ESD for investigating hazardous waste
sites for the RCRA and Superfund programs, performance of
NPDES inspection and air monitoring. In particular, sampling
of environmental media and waste, sample handling and
preservation, decontamination of field equipment, installation
of monitoring wells, and field quality assurance procedures
are described. Sampling equipment is discussed and de-
scribed. Surveying requirements for site characterization are
given.

Specifications: 449p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Site sur-
veys, Waste management, EPA region 4.

0536 EPA Interim Guidance on Indemnification of
Superfund Response Action Contractors Under Section
119 of SARA

Order Number PB91-139402CDH, price: PC AG3/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 6 Oct 87
The directive provides guidance to EPA Regional personnel
on EPA Superfund response action contractor indemnifica-
tion, including EPA interim guidelines, procedures for proc-
essing indemnification requests, and model indemnification
contract language.

Specifications: 38p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0537 Evaluating Mixed Funding Settlements under
CERCLA

Order Number PB91-139238CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 20 Oct 87
The report provides guidance to the Regions for evaluating
settlement proposals that the Regions may receive from po-
tentially responsible parties for EPA to provide mixed funding
at CERCLA sites. The goals of the guidance are to encour-
age the Regions to consider mixed funding settlements,
present a method for mixed funding, and to present criteria
for evaluating good versus poor candidates.

Specifications: 20p.

Subject index keywords: Financing, Government policies,
Waste treatment, Superfund, Comprehensive Environmental
Response.

0538 Evaluation of, and Additional Guidance on, Issuance
of Unilateral Administrative Orders (UAOs) for RD/RA

Order Number PB91-201764CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 20 Jun 91
The purpose of the directive is to present the results of a
recent evaluation conducted by the Office of Waste Pro-
grams Enforcement (OWPE) of the selection process EPA
uses in issuing UAOs to Potentially Responsible Parties
(PRPs) for RD/RA under CERCLA; and, based on the eval-

uation, to give further guidance on the process used to
select recipients of UAOs.

Specifications: 6p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Remedial action, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Re-
sponse, Record of Decision, Potentially responsible parties.

0539 Expanded Civil Judicial Referral Procedures

Order Number PB91-139766CDH, price: PC A03/MF AG1
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 28 Aug 86
The directive provides guidance on procedures for civil judi-
cial referrals to the Department of Justice. The memorandum
expands the current direct referral program, indicates that
Headquarters should not establish mandatory requirements
for pre-referral negotiations, mandates use of 'hold action'
cases only for strategic or tactical reasons and offers guid-
ance on the preparation of bankruptcy cases.

Specifications: See also PB91 -139774.16p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0540 Expansion of Direct Referral of Cases to the
Department of Justice

Order Number PB91-139790CDH, price: PC AG3/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 14 Jan 88
The directive provides guidance to EPA Headquarters and
Regional personnel regarding procedures to follow in imple-
menting the expanded direct referral agreement. Prior guid-
ance on direct referrals appears in a November 28, 1983,
memorandum entitiled, 'Implementation of Direct Referrals
for Civil Cases Beginning December 1, 1983.' That guidance
is superseded to the extent that the current guidance re-
places or changes procedures set forth therein; otherwise
the 1983 document remains in effect.

Specifications: 16p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0541 Final EPA Policy on the Inclusion of Environmental
Auditing Provisions In Enforcement Settlements

Order Number PB92-102094CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 14 Nov 86
The purpose of the directive is to provide Agency enforce-
ment personnel with general criteria for and guidance on se-
lecting judicial and administrative enforcement cases in
which EPA will seek to include environmental auditing provi-
sions among terms of any settlement.

Specifications: 73p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Superfund,
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0542 Final Guidance on Preparing Waste-In Lists and
Volumetric Rankings for Release to Potentially
Responsible Parties (PRPs) under CERCLA ('Waste-In'
Guidance)

Order Number PB91-1870Q5CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 22 Feb 91
The directive provides guidance on the compilation and re-
lease of waste-in lists and volumetric rankings to help Re-
gions comply with the information release requirements of
CERCLA section 122(e) and the information release and ex-
change policies outlined in OSWER directives 9835.12 and
9834.10.

Specifications: 30p.

Subject index keywords: Waste management, Superfund,

Notification procedures, Hazardous materials, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response.

0543 First 125 De Minimis Settlements: Statistics from
EPA's De Minimis Database

Order Number PB94-963606CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Oct 93
Under Section 122(g) of the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), EPA
is encouraged to reach settlements with two types of parties:
de minimis waste contributors and de minimis landowners.
Since 1986, when Section 122(g) was passed as part of the
Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act, EPA has
entered into about 125 de minimis settlements, thereby re-
solving the liability of more than 6,000 parties. In an effort to
facilitate the greater use of de minimis settlements, EPA has
developed the De Minimis Database, a comprehensive
system designed to track over 100 data elements for each
settlement. EPA is using this system to track and analyze all
finalized de minimis settlements. This report summarizes
data maintained in the De Minimis Database. The information
contained in the database is drawn from several sources:
final de minimis settlement documents (including attach-
ments such as settlor lists and signature pages); a survey
questionnaire completed by EPA Regional personnel for
each settlement; CERCLIS (the Comprehensive Environmen-
tal Response, Compensation, and Liability Information
System); and the ROD Annual Reports.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous wastes, Waste man-
agement, Data base management, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, De minimis settlements.

0544 Guidance of the Use of Stipulated Penalties In
Hazardous Waste Consent Decrees

Order Number PB91-139360CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 27 Sep 89
The directive provides guidance on the use of stipulated pen-
alties in hazardous waste consent decrees. The directive
supplements directive no. 9835.2 'Guidance on Draft Con-
sent Decrees in Hazardous Waste Cases,' dated May 1,
1985.

Specifications: 22p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0545 Guidance on Applicability of EPA Order 3500.1 to
CERCLA Staff

Order Number PB91-139642CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 28 Nov 88
The directive defines, through guidance to the Regions,
which CERCLA staff are subject to the requirements of EPA
order 3500.1. The order established training requirements for
compliance inspectors and field investigators.

Specifications: Portions of this document are not fully legi-
ble. 6p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0546 Guidance on CERCLA Section 106 Judicial Actions

Order Number PB91-139428CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 24 Feb 89
The directive provides criteria for consideration in selecting
and initiating CERCLA section 106 judicial actions. The guid-
ance also identifies and discusses issues that should be con-
sidered in preparation of a section 106 referral.
Specifications: 12p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0547 Guidance on CERCLA Settlements with De Micromis
Waste Contributors

Order Number PB93-963619CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 30 Jul 93
The purpose of the memorandum is to provide guidance on
using CERCLA's settlement authorities to resolve the
CERCLA liability of parties who have contributed even less
hazardous substances to a site than the de minimis parties
the Agency traditionally pursues. These parties will herein-
after be referred to as 'de micromis' parties. The memoran-
dum describes the types of situations in which a Region may
find that it is in the public interest to exercise enforcement
discretion by offering de micromis settlements. The guidance
also explains how to use EPA's existing settlement authority
in an expeditious manner to resolve the liability of de micro-
mis parties and to grant them the full extent of contribution
protection available under the statute.

Specifications; Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $450). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 18p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Lawsuits.

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0548 Guidance on CERCLA 106(a) Unilateral
Administrative Orders for Remedial Designs and
Remedial Actions

Order Number PB91-139089CDH, price; PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 13 Mar 90
The directive discusses section 106 unilateral orders and the
CERCLA remedial program, and statutory requirements and
policy factors for issuing section 106 unilateral orders for re-
medial designs and remedial actions. Key provisions of uni-
lateral orders and specialized forms and use of such orders
also are discussed. The directive supplements directive no.
9833.0, entitled 'Guidance on the Use and Issuance of Ad-
ministrative Orders Under Section 106,' dated September 8,
1983, and directive no. 9833.0-2b 'Model Administrative
Order for Remedial Designs and Remedial Action,' dated
March 30, 1990.

Specifications: See also PB91-139097. 38p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0549 Guidance on Documenting Decisions Not to Take
Cost Recovery Actions

Order Number PB91-139048CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 7 Jun 88
The directive provides information to Regional Superfund
personnel on the content of close-out memoranda that
should be written for each site where EPA does not intend,
on the basis of certain information, to pursue an action for
cost recovery of unreimbursed Superfund monies.
Specifications: 10p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0550 Guidance on Drafting Consent Decrees in
Hazardous Waste Cases

Order Number PB91-139345CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1 May 85
The directive focuses on the consent decree provisions
which are vital to settlement in hazardous waste cases, and
are handled differently or not at all under other programs.
The directive supplements directive no. 9835.0 'Interim
CERCLA Settlement Policy,' dated December 5, 1984.
Specifications: 26p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0551 Guidance on Federal Superfund Liens

Order Number PB91-139055CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 22 Sep 87
The directive establishes guidance on the use of Federal
liens to enhance Superfund cost recovery. Section 107(f) of
the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986
adds a new section 107(1) to CERCLA, which provides for
the establishment of a Federal lien in favor of the United
States upon property that is the subject of a removal or re-
medial action. The guidance provides: (1) analysis of statuto-
ry issues regarding the nature and scope to the lien, (2)

policy on filing a Federal lien to support a cost recovery
action, and {3) procedures for filing a notice of lien and
taking an 'in rem' action to recover the costs of a lien.
Specifications: 12p.

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0552 Guidance on Landowner Liability under Section
107(a)(1) of CERCLA, De Minimis Settlements under
Section 122(g)(1)(B) of CERCLA, and Settlements with
Prospective Purchasers of Contaminated Property

Order Number PB91-139444CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 6 Jun 89
The purpose of the directive is to provide general guidance
on landowner liability under the Comprehensive Environmen-
tal Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980
('CERCLA'), as amended by the Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act of 1986, Pub.L. No.99-499 ('SARA'), 42
U.S.C. S9601 et seq., and to provide specific guidance on
which landowners qualify for de minimis settlements under
Section 122(g)(1)(B) and on structuring such settlements. Be-
cause the nature of a de minimis settlement with a landown-
er will differ substantially from a de minimis settlement with
waste contributors, it will usually be more efficient to draft
such agreements separately. In addition, because the
Agency has received numerous requests from prospective
purchasers of contaminated property for covenants not to
sue, the memorandum sets forth Agency policy on this issue.
Specifications: Portions of this document are not fully legi-
ble. 59p.

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0553 Guidance on Premium Payments in CERCLA
Settlements

Order Number PB91-139410CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 17 Nov 88
The directive provides guidance on the use of premium pay-
ments in CERCLA settlements. It describes the key features
of a premium payment settlement, considerations regarding
timing of the settlement, and the factors to be considered in
deciding if a premium should be accepted.

Specifications: 19p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0554 Guidance on Preparing Waste-in Lists and
Volumetric Rankings for Release to Potentially
Responsible Parties (PRPs) under CERCLA

Order Number PB92-963606CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 22 Feb 91
The directive provides guidance on the compilation and re-
lease of waste-in lists and volumetric rankings to help Re-
gions comply with the information release requirements of
CERCLA section 122(e) and the information release and ex-
change policies outlined in OSWER directives 9835.12 and
9834.10.

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0555 Guidance on Procedures for Submitting CERCLA
Section 106(b) Reimbursement Petitions and on EPA
Review of Those Petitions

Order Number PB92-963610CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 29 Jun 92
The directive describes the procedures for submitting a
CERCLA Section 106(b) petition. In addition, the document
describes EPA's process for reviewing the petitions.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 21 p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0556 Guidance Regarding CERCLA Enforcement against
Bankrupt Parties

Order Number PB91-139014CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 24 May 84
The directive assists the Regions in developing CERCLA en-
forcement actions against bankrupt parties. The guidance is
intended to encourage agressive enforcement against insol-
vent parties and ensure national consistency in current and
future bankruptcy cases brought by the Agency. The guid-
ance is supplemented by directive no. 9832.7-1a, which used
to be directive no. 9832.8, 'Revised Hazardous Waste Bank-
ruptcy Guidance,'dated May 23, 1986.

Specifications: See also PB91-139022. 47p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0557 initiation of PRP-Financed Remedial Design in
Advance of Consent Decree Entry (Final)

Order Number PB91-139394CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 18 Nov 88
The directive addresses a process for expediting the initi-
ation of response work by potentially responsible parties at
sites where agreements with PRPs have been reached, but
where consent decrees have not yet been entered by the
court.

Specifications: 8p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0558 Interim Cashout Settlement Procedures

Order Number PB92-963609CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 7 Jan 92
The directive addresses certain issues related to Superfund
cashout settlements. These interim procedures provides ap-

proaches to resolve certain issues which arose in recent ca-
shout settlements.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Cashout settlements.

0559 Interim CERCLA Settlement Policy

Order Number PB91-139329CDH, price; PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 5 Dec 84
The directive discusses private party cleanup and contribu-
tion proposals under CERCLA. It is supplemented by direc-
tives no. 9835.2 and 9834.2.

Specifications: Portions of this document are not fully legi-
ble. 24p,

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0560 Interim Guidance on Notice Letters, Negotiations,
and Information Exchange

Order Number PB91-139253CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 19 Oct 87
The report provides guidance to the Regions on issuing
notice letters, entering into negotiations, and exchanging in-
formation with potentially responsible parties. The guidance
contains a discussion of the section 122(e) special notice
procedures and the subsequent negotiation moratorium.
Specifications: 43 p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment, Liabilities.

0561 Interim Guidance on Potentially Responsible Party
Participation in Remedial Investigations and Feasibility
Studies

Order Number PB91-139337CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 16 May 88
The directive sets forth policies and procedures governing
potentially responsible party participation in the remedial in-
vestigations and feasibility studies process, including initiation
of PRP searches, PRP notifications, development of agree-
ments, and oversight of RI/FS activities. The document su-
persedes directive no. 9835.1 'Participation of Potentially Re-
sponsible Parties in Development of RIs and FSs under
CERCLA," dated March 3, 1984.

Specifications: Portions of this document are not fully legi-
ble. 42p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Remedial action, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response, Potentially responsible parties.

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0562 Interim Guidance on Settlements with De Minimis
Waste Contributors under Section 122(g) of SARA

Order Number PB91-139196CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 19 Jun 87
The directive provides interim guidance for determining which
potentially responsible parties qualify for treatment as de
minimus waste contributors pursuant to section 122(g)(1)(A)
of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of
1986, and to present interim guidelines for settlement with
such de minimus parties pursuant to section 122(g) of SARA.
The directive is superseded by directive 9834.7-1 A 'interim
Model CERCLA Section 122(g)(4) De Minimus Waste Con-
tributor Consent Decree and Administrative Order on Con-
sent,' dated October 19, 1987.

Specifications: 34p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0563 Interim Guidance: Streamlining the CERCLA
Settlement Decision Process

Order Number PB91-139386CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 12 Feb 87
The directive provides guidance to streamline and improve
the CERCLA settlement decision process. The guidance ad-
dresses three areas of settlement process: (1) negotiation
preparation, (2) management review, and (3) criteria for ter-
minating or continuing negotiations. The directive is supple-
mented by directive no. 9835.4-1 a.

Specifications: Portions of this document are not fully legi-
ble. 15p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0564 Interim Guidelines for Preparing Nonbinding
Preliminary Allocations of Responsibility

Order Number PB92-102078CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1991
The directive discusses Section 122(e)(3) of the Superfund
Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA), Pub.
L. No. 99-499, which amended the Comprehensive Environ-
mental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980
(CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. Sections 9601 et seq., which requires
the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to develop
guidelines for preparing nonbinding preliminary allocations of
responsibility (NBARs). As defined in Section 122(e)(3)(A), an
NBAR is an allocation by EPA among potentially responsible
parties (PRPs) of percentages of total response costs at a
facility. SARA authorizes EPA to provide NBARs at its discre-
tion. NBARs are a tool EPA may use in appropriate cases to
promote remedial settlements.

Specifications: 11 p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Superfund,
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Nonbinding Preliminary Allocations of Responsi-
bility.

0565 Interim Model CERCLA Section 122(g) (4) De
Minimis Waste Contributor Consent Decree and
Administrative Order on Consent

Order Number PB91-139204CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 19 Oct 87
The report provides interim model language to assist the Re-
gions in drafting de minimis waste contributor consent de-
crees and administrative orders on consent under section
122(g)(4) of CERCLA, as amended by SARA. There are
models attached to the memorandum.

Specifications: 20p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials. Waste dis-
posal, Law(Jurisprudence), Superfund.

0566 Interim Policy on Mixed Funding Settlements
Involving the Preauthorization of States or Political
Subdivisions

Order Number PB91-139246CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 27 May 88
The report establishes EPA's interim policy on the use of
mixed funding/preauthorization settlements of States or polit-
ical subdivisions that are potentially responsible parties. The
guidance clarified that States and political subdivisions are
eligible to file preauthorization claims against the Fund when
they are acting pursuing to settlement agreement. The direc-
tive supplements directive No. 9834.9 'Evaluating Mixed
Funding Agreements Under CERCLA,' dated October 20,
1987.

Specifications: 6p.

Subject index keywords: Government policies, Financing,
Waste treatment, Superfund.

0567 Issuance of Administrative Orders for Immediate
Removal Actions

Order Number PB91-139105CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 21 Feb 84
The directive sets forth guidance on issuing administrative
orders for immediate removal actions under CERCLA. The
guidance should be used in conjunction with the recently
issued 'Guidance on the Use and Issuance of Administrative
Orders under Section 106(a) of CERCLA,' dated September
8, 1983.

Specifications: Portions of this document are not fuily legi-
ble. 15p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Remedial action, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response.

0568 issuance of Administrative Orders Under Section
3013 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act

Order Number PB91-140111CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 30 May 86
Section 17 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act Amendments of
1980 (P.L. 96482) added Section 3013 to the Resource Con-
servation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA). The directive
provides guidance on the use of that section and replaces
earlier guidance issued September 11, 1981. Under current
delegation authority Section 3013 Administrative Orders are
issued by Regional Administrator (RAs) with the advance

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

concurrence of the Director, Office of Waste Programs En-
forcement (OWPE) except in cases of national significance
or multi-regional cases. Then the director, OWPE, issues the
Orders, The Assistant Administrator for Enforcement and
Compliance Monitoring (OECM), consults as requested on
orders, refers Section 3013 judicial actions to the Depart-
ment of Justice, and sends notices of such actions to the ap-
propriate RA and the Director OWPE. Further redelegation Is
currently under review.

Specifications: 50p.

Subject index keywords; Waste management, Superfund,

Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0569 Issuance of Final Revised Guidance on the Use and
Issuance of Administrative Orders Under Section 7003 of
the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)

Order Number PB91-140129CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 26 Sep 84
The directive discusses guidance on the use and issuance of
Administrative Orders under Section 7003 of RCRA where
there is an emimincnt and substantial endangerment to
public health and the environment. In order to issue a Sec-
tion 7003 order, the Administrator must possess evidence
'that the handling, storage, treatment, transportation or dis-
posal of any solid waste or hazardous waste may present an
imminent and substantial endangerment to health or the en-
vironment' (42 U.S.C. Section 6973). Additionally, Section
7003 requires that the Administrator provide notice to the af-
fected State prior to issuance of the order. Each of these re-
quirements is discussed in the directive.

Specifications: 25p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0570 Liability of Corporate Shareholders and Successor
Corporations for Abandoned Sites Under the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation
and Liability Act

Order Number PB91-139030CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 13 Jun 84
The directive identifies legal principles bearing on the extent
to which corporate shareholders and successor corporations
may be held liable for response costs that arise as a result
of a release at a hazardous waste facility.

Specifications: 20p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Remedial action, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response.

0571 Limiting Lead Transfers to Private Parties during
Discrete Phases of the Remedial Process

Order Number PB92-963602CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 14 Nov 91
In order to avoid delays caused by remedial process lead
changes from EPA to private parties, this directive recom-
mends to Regions that they avoid letting PRPs assume the
lead in the middle of a discrete phase of the process (e.g.,
RI/FS, RD, or RA), and take preemptive steps to avoid
delays when making lead changes between the RD and RA.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0572 Methodologies for Implementation of CERCLA
Section 122(g) (1) (A) De Minimis Waste Contributor
Settlements Proposals and Agreements

Order Number PB91-139212CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 20 Dec 89
The report provides assistance to the Regional case staff in
the evaluation and development of de minimis contributor
settlement proposals and agreements. The methodologies
presented are general suggestions, recognizing the site-spe-
cific aspects of each site.

Specifications: 26p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous wastes, Waste dispos-
al, Waste treatment, Superfund.

0573 Methodology for Early De Minimis Waste
Contributor Settlements under CERCLA Section 122(g)
(1) (A)

Order Number PB92-963607CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Jun 92
The directive sets forth procedures for identifying early de
minimis candidates for potential de minimis settlements early
in the response process (for example, prior to the signature
of a Record of Decision), and provides a methodology for
developing such settlements. The report also provides practi-
cal assistance in developing early de minimis settlement pro-
posals and agreements. It supplements OSWER Directive
9847.7-1 B 'Methodologies for Implementation of CERCLA
Section 122(g)(1)(A) De Minimis Waste Contributor Settle-
ments', dated December 20, 1989.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others S400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB91-139212. 22p.
Subject index keywords*. Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0574 Model Administrative Order on Consent for
Removal Actions

Order Number PB93-963605CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 93
The model order on consent for removal actions embodies
the language that EPA regional offices should use when is-
suing removal administrative orders on consent.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 29p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste man-
agement, Remedial action, Superfund, Record of Decision,
Waste removal.

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0575 Model Informational Notice Letter to Local
Governments

Order Number PB91-187013CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 7 May 91
The directive is a model letter which will be used to notify
local governments of EPA's activities which will take place
within their jurisdiction at a Superfund site.

Specifications: 8p.

Subject index keywords: Local government, Superfund, No-
tification procedures, Waste management, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response.

0576 Model Litigation Report for CERCLA Sections 106
and 107 and RCRA Section 7003

Order Number PB91-139451CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 21 Jun 89
The directive supplements previous Agency guidance entitled
'Model Litigation Report Outline and Guidance' (OECM,
August 23, 1984), which addressed the preparation of a liti-
gation package under most statutes, but excluded, among
others, packages to be prepared for prosecution of civil judi-
cial actions under CERCLA Sections 106 and 107 and RCRA
Section 7003. The model is intended for use in all civil judi-
cial cases referred to the Department of Justice for prosecu-
tion under CERCLA Sections 106 and 107 and RCRA Sec-
tion 7003. For those actions referred in conjunction with a
settlement, a full litigation report is not required. The docu-
ment also does not specifically address preparation of litiga-
tion reports for prosecution of penalty actions under
CERCLA Sections 106(b), 109 or 122(1), although many sec-
tions of the document may be applicable to the preparation
of such litigation reports.

Specifications: 47p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Lawsuits, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response.

0577 Model Notice Letters

Order Number PB91-139279CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 2 Jul 89
The report includes the model notice letters to be used in
preparing site-specific notice letters to PRP's. The letters
notify Potential responsible parties of their potential CERCLA
liability.

Specifications: 41 p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment, Liabilities.

0578 Model Statement of Work for a Remedial
Investigation and Feasibility Study Conducted by
Potentially Responsible Parties

Order Number P891-139436CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 2 Jun 89
The directive provides potentially responsible parties with di-
rection in performing tasks that are required to successfully
complete a remedial investigation and feasibility study. The
model statement of work is used in conjunction with OERR's
October 1988 RI/FS guidance, and closely follows the model
RI/FS administrative order on consent. The directive supple-
ments directive no. 9355.3-01.

Specifications: 35p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Remedial action, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response, Potentially responsible parties.

0579 Model Unilateral Administrative Order for Removal
Response Activities

Order Number PB93-963606CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 93
The directive embodies the language that EPA regional of-
fices should use when issuing removal unilateral administra-
tive orders.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste man-
agement, Superfund, Waste removal.

0580 Model Unilateral Order for Remedial Design and
Remedial Action

Order Number PB91-139097CDH. price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 30 Mar 90

The directive establishes a model order for remedial design
and remedial action. The purpose of the model is to improve
the quality of remedial actions performed by private parties,
promote consistency among the Regions, and to expedite
potentially responsible parties (PRP)-Iead cleanups at
CERCLA sites. The directive supplements directive no.
9833.0-1 (a) entitled, 'Guidance on CERCLA 106(a) Unilateral
Administrative Orders for Remedial Designs and Remedial
Actions,' dated March 13, 1990.

Specifications: See also PB91 -139089. 49p,

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0581 Multi-Media Settlements of Enforcement Claims

Order Number PB91-139608CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 6 Feb 90
The directive explains EPA policy disfavoring judicial and ad-
ministrative settlements which include releases of potential
enforcement claims.

Specifications: 9p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0582 Multi-Media Settlements of Enforcement Claims

Order Number PB92-102136CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 6 Feb 90
The purpose of the directive is to provide guidance which ex-
plains (1) EPA policy strongly disfavoring judicial and admin-
istrative settlements of enforcement cases which include re-
leases of potential enforcement claims under statutes which
are not named in the complaint and do not serve as the
basis for the Agency bringing the enforcement action, and
(2) how approval for any multi-media settlements of enforce-

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

ment claims should be obtained in civil judicial enforcement
cases in the Region and at Headquarters.

Specifications: 7p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Superfund,
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0583 Municipal Settlements

Order Number PB91-139311CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 6 Dec 89
The directive establishes EPA's interim policy on settlements
involving municipal waste.

Specifications: 39p,

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Municipal wastes, Remedial action, Municipal Settlement
Policy, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

0584 Policy for Enforcement Actions against
Transporters under CERCLA

Order Number PB91-138859GDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 23 Dec 85
The directive defines parties which are liable for response
costs under section 107(A)(4) of CERCLA, including persons
who transport hazardous substances to disposal or treatment
facilities.

Specifications: See also PB91 -138867. 8p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response,

0585 Policy on Recovering Indirect Cost in CERCLA
Section 107 Cost Recovery Actions

Order Number PB91-138990CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 27 Jun 86
The directive clarifies EPA's policy regarding the recovery of
indirect costs in CERCLA cost recovery actions, stating that
the decision whether to seek indirect costs in existing cases
will be made by the Regions after consultation with the De-
partment of Justice and with the concurrence of EPA's Office
of Enforcement Compliance and Monitoring and Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement.

Specifications: 7p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0586 Policy Towards Owners of Residential Property at
Superfund Sites

Order Number PB91-205476CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 3 Jul 91
The directive sets forth The Agency's enforcement policy to-
wards owners of residential property located on a Superfund
Site. Under this policy the Agency, in the exercise of enforce-
ment discretion will not pursue owners of residential property
for performance of a response action or payment of re-
sponse costs. This policy does not apply where the owners'
activities lead to a release or threat of release of hazardous
substances, resulting in the taking of a response action at
the site, This policy does not apply where the owner fails to
cooperate with the Agency's response action, fails to cooper-

ate with institutional controls places on the property, fails to
meet other CERCLA obligations, or uses the residential prop-
erty inconsistent with residential use.

Specifications: 10p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0587 Policy Towards Owners of Residential Property at
Superfund Sites

Order Number PB92-963615CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 1992
The document summarizes the US EPA policy towards
owners of residential property at Superfund Sites. The policy
addresses concerns raised by owners of residential property
located on Superfund sites and provides Regions with a na-
tionally consistent approach on the issue. The guidance sets
forth in writing what has been the Agency's past practice to-
wards owners of residential property located on Superfund
sites.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Property
owners, Residential buildings, Government policies.

0588 Preparation of Hazardous Waste Referrals

Order Number PB91-139543CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 30 Jul 85
The directive discusses experience with the implementation
of the Case Management Handbook. It indicates that filing by
the Department of Justice has been delayed in some cases
by specific problems (as listed in the directive).
Specifications: 8p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0589 Procedural Guidance on Treatment of Insurers
under CERCLA

Order Number PB91-139188CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 21 Nov 85
The report provides EPA Regional offices with the appropri-
ate procedures to follow in issuing notice letters, developing
referrals, and tracking CERCLA enforcement cases that may
include insurers as third-party defendants.

Specifications: 76p,

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Law enforcement, Case studies.

0590 Procedures for Documenting Costs for CERCLA
Section 107 Actions

Order Number PB91-138958CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 30 Jan 85
The directive sets forth the procedures for documenting
costs for CERCLA section 107 cost recovery actions. These
procedures require the close cooperation and coordination
among Headquarters and Regional program, legal, and finan-

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION; Enforcement

cial offices. The procedures manual should be used in con-
junction with the Case Development Handbook. The guid-
ance supplements directive no. 9832.0, and replaces direc-
tive no. 9832.4 by number only; the document has not
changed.

Specifications: See also PB91-138941. 125p.

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0591 Procedures for Transmittal of CERCLA and RCRA
Civil Judicial Enforcement Case Packages to
Headquarters

Order Number PB91-139774CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 12 Jun 89
The directive clarifies which CERCLA and RCRA referral and
settlement documents are to be sent to whom at Headquar-
ters. The directive supplements directive no. 9891.1 'Expand-
ed Civil Judicial Referral Procedures,' dated August 28,1986.
Specifications: See also PB91-139766. 6p.

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0592 PRP Search Supplemental Guidance for Sites in the
Superfund Remedial Program

Order Number PB91-139162CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of.
Emergency and Remedial Response; 16 Jun 89
The purpose of the document is to provide guidance on po-
tentially responsible parties (PRP) search planning and man-
agement and on the content of PRP search reports. The
guidance applies to sites in the remedial program and it sup-
plements the August, 1987 PRP Search Manual.
Specifications: 38p.

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0593 Redelegation of Civil Judicial Settlement Authorities
under Delegation 14-13-B and 14-14-E

Order Number PB91-138834CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 18 Aug 88
The document is composed of redelegations and consulta-
tion on judicial settlements and de minimis settlements to Di-
rector of the Office of Waste Programs, from AA/OSWER.
Specifications: 9p.

Subject index keywords: Refuse disposal, Penalties, Office
of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Comprehensive
Environment Response Compensation and Liability Act.

0594 Releasing Identities of Potentially Responsible
Parties in Response to FOIA Requests

Order Number PB91-139147CDH. price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 26 Jan 84
The directive provides EPA policy on responding to requests
under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) for the names
of potentially responsible parties at CERCLA sites, and ex-
plains exceptions. The guidance states that in response to a
FOIA request, EPA will release the names of PRPs who have
received notice letters about CERCLA sites.

Specifications: 7p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0595 Releasing Information to Potentially Responsible
Parties at CERCLA Sites

Order Number PB91-139469CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1 Mar 90
The directive presents Agency policy on releasing informa-
tion, for the purpose of facilitating settlement, to potentially
responsible parties (PRP) at sites addressed under CERCLA.
The directive partially supersedes directive no. 9835.0 "Inter-
im CERCLA Settlement Policy' and supplements directive no.
9834.0 'Releasing Identities of PRPs in Response to Free-
dom of Information Act Requests' and directive no. 9834.10
'Interim Guidance on Notice Letters, Negotiations and Infor-
mation Exchange,' dated October 19, 1987.

Specifications: 9p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0596 Report to Congress: Settlements with Municipal
Waste Generators and Transporters Since 1991 under
the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980

Order Number PB93-963604CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 12 Mar 93
The report to Congress summarizes the status of completed
settlements and ongoing negotiations with municipal genera-
tors and transporters of municipal solid waste and municipal
sewage sludge under the Comprehensive Environmental Re-
sponse, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 since 1991.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 9p.

Subject Index keywords: Municipal wastes, Hazardous ma-
terials transportation. Waste management, Sewage sludge,
Superfund, Settlements.

0597 Revised EPA Guidance on Parallel Proceedings

Order Number PB91-139667CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 21 Jun 89
The directive provides guidance on simultaneous pursuit of
criminal prosecutions and civil, judicial, or Agency administra-
tive actions.

Specifications: Portions of this document are not fully legi-
ble. 27p.

Subject index keywords: Waste management, Superfund,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0598 Revised Hazardous Waste Bankruptcy Guidance

Order Number PB91-139022CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 23 May 86
The directive supplements the May 24, 1984, guidance
'CERCLA Enforcement Against Bankrupt Parties' and the

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

guidelines on bankruptcy contained in the Cost Recovery
Handbook 'Procedures for Documenting Costs for CERCLA
Section 107 Actions,' directive no. 9832.7, dated January 30,
1985. The memorandum defines specific criteria for evaluat-
ing the merits of a potential bankruptcy referral and elabo-
rates on the policy regarding settlement with bankrupt par-
ties. It reviews the recent judicial decisions in the areas of
the automatic stay, abandonment, discharge, and claims of
administrative expenses, and briefly describes the new en-
forcement theories that have been asserted by the Agency in
recent pleadings.

Specifications: See also PB91-139014. 28p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0599 Revised Hazardous Waste Bankruptcy Guidance,
October 7, 1991

Order Number PB92-105485CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Corvallis Environmental Research Lab., OR; 7 Oct 91
The Agency's recent experience in CERCLA and RCRA
bankruptcy actions has identified the need for updated and
revised guidance on the scope of EPA's enforcement actions
against bankrupt parties. The directive is intended to update
the May 24, 1984 guidance 'CERCLA Enforcement Against
Bankrupt Parties' and the guidelines on bankruptcy contained
in the Cost Recovery Handbook 'Procedures for Document-
ing Costs for CERCLA Section 107 Actions,' January 30,
1985. The memorandum defines specific criteria for evaluat-
ing the merits of a potential bankruptcy referral; elaborates
on the policy regarding settlement with bankrupt parties; re-
views the recent judicial decisions in the areas of the auto-
matic stay, abandonment, discharge, and claims of adminis-
trative expenses; and briefly describes how new enforcement
theories which have been asserted by the Agency in recent
pleadings.

Specifications: Supersedes PB91 -139022. 25p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency

Response.

0600 Revised Policy on Discretionary Information
Release under CERCLA

Order Number PB93-963610CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response: 31 Mar 93
The memorandum revises OSWER Directive 9835.12, Re-
leasing Information to Potentially Responsible Parties of
CERCLA Sites, with the intention of streamlining and expedit-
ing the CERCLA settlement process.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Potentially responsible parties.

0601 Revised Procedures for Implementing Off-Site
Response Actions

Order Number PB91-139287CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 13 Nov 87
The directive describes procedures that should be observed
when a response action under CERCLA or section 7003 of

RCRA involves the off-site treatment, storage, or disposal of
CERCLA waste. The directive supersedes directive no.

9300.2-5 'Procedures for Planning and Implementing Off-site
Response Actions,' directive no. 9330.2-6 'Eligibility of Facili-
ties in Assessment Monitoring," and directive no. 9830.2-1
'Procedures for Planning and Implementing Off-site Re-
sponse Actions under CERCLA,' dated May 6, 1985.
Specifications: 25p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0602 Revision of CERCLA Civil Judicial Settlement
Authorities under Delegations 14-13-B and 14-14-E

Order Number PB91-138818CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 17 Jun 88
The directive implements revisions to the consultation and
concurrence requirements of the civil judicial settlement dele-
gations, which are designed to streamline the enforcement
process and help achieve Agency remedial action and cost
recovery goals. These revisions expand Regional authority to
approve CERCLA settlements. The directive supplements a
portion of directive No. 9012.10 'Redelegation of Authority
Under CERCLA and SARA,' dated May 25,1988.
Specifications: 8p.

Subject index keywords: Refuse disposal, Penalties, Office
of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Comprehensive
Environment Response Compensation and Liability Act.

0603 Revisions to the Interim Guidance on PRP
Participation in Remedial Investigations and Feasibility
Studies

Order Number PB91-139352CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 7 Feb 89
The directive sets forth policies and procedures governing
potentially responsible party participation in the remedial in-
vestigations and feasibility studies process, including initiation
of PRP searches, PRP notification, development of agree-
ments and oversight of RI/FS activities. The directive super-
sedes directive no. 9835.1 'Participation of PRPs in Develop-
ment of Rls and FSs under CERCLA' and directive no.

9355.3-01 'Guidance on RI/FS.'

Specifications: Portions of this document are not fully legi-
ble. 42p,

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0604 Roles and Responsibilities of Regional Project
Officers and Headquarters Zone Project Officers for
Management of TES
-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

ities of Regional Project Officers and Work Assignment Man-
agers under TES 3 and 4 remains in effect with respect to
those contracts.

Specifications: See also PB91 -139741. 26p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0605 Scope of the CERCLA Petroleum Exclusion under
Sections 101(14) and 104(a)(2)

Order Number PB91-139550CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 31 Jul 87
The directive discusses whether contaminants in used oil or
any other petroleum substances are within the petroleum ex-
clusion.

Specifications: 15p,

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0606 Site Classification Changes from Enforcement to
Fund Lead

Order Number PB91-139600CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 5 May 87
The directive explains to the Regions the circumstances and
procedures to follow for changing National Priorities List site
classification from enforcement to Fund Lead. The directive
supplements directive no. 9200.3-1 'FY 1987 Superfund
SCAP Manual,' dated September 30, 1987.

Specifications: 7p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0607 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by Party Name Report

Order Number PB90-242888CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The frequency listing is
arranged in the following manner. The number of sites asso-
ciated with the party is indicated in the site's column. The
first two characters of the site ID number constitute the state
abbreviation of the site location.

Specifications: 119p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Coordinated procurement, Site Enforcement Tracking
System, Superfund, Remedial action.

0608 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):

Frequency by Party Name Report

Order Number PB91-130518CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP), Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP.

Specifications: Supersedes PB90-242868. 123p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site Enforce-
ment Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action, Poten-
tially responsible parties.

0609 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by Party Name Report

Order Number PB91-170423CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The frequency listing is arranged in the following
manner. The number of sites associated with the party is in-
dicated in the site's column. The first two characters of the
site ID number constitute the state abbreviation of the site
location.

Specifications: Supersedes PB91-130518. 142p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible par-
ties.

101

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0610 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by PRP Name Report, September 26, 1991

Order Number PB92-105345CDH, price: PC A08
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 26 Sep 91

When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP), Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrtive duties related to tracking the
PRP. The frequency listing is arranged in the following
manner. The number of sites associated with the party is In-
dicated in the site's column. The first two characters of the
site ID number constitute the state abbreviation of the site
location.

Specifications: Supersedes PB91-215186. 170p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Direc-
tories, Hazardous materials, Site Enforcement Tracking
System, Potentially responsible parties, US EPA Regions 1-
10.

0611 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (National)

Order Number PB90-591790CDH, price; Subscription, call for
price

Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 31 Jul 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
dress the range of other administrative duties related to
tracking the PRP. These fists represent EPA's preliminary
findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclusion on these lists
does not constitute a final determination concerning the li-
ability of any party for the hazard or contamination at any
CERCLA site.

Specifications: Available in 9-track EBCDIC character set,
1600 bpi. Available on subscription, U.S., Canada and
Mexico price $880.00/year; all others $1760.00/year. Also
available on demand as PB90-591791, price T02 for either
1600 or 6250 bpi. Issued quarterly. System: IBM 3090; ESA
3.1.3 operating system. For system on diskette, see PB90-
591780.

Subject index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
Superfund, Remedial action, Regional analysis, Waste man-
agement.

0612 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): National
Alphabetical Report by PRP Name, September 26,1991

Order Number PB92-105360CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 26 Sep 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data Includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites, SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP.

Specifications: Supersedes PB91-215160. 3746p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Remedial action, Directories, Potentially re-
sponsible parties. Site Enforcement Tracking System.

0613 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (National)
(for Microcomputers)

Order Number PB90-591780CDH, price: Subscription, call for
price

Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 31 Jul 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number, SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
dress the range of other administrative duties related to
tracking the PRP. These lists represent EPA's preliminary
findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclusion on these lists
does not constitute a final determination concerning the li-
ability of any party for the hazard or contamination at any
CERCLA site.

Specifications: The datafile is contained on twelve 1,2M, 5
1/4 inch diskettes, high density. File format: ASCII. Available
on subscription, U.S., Canada and Mexico price $920.00/
year; price for others $184Q.Q0/year. Also available on
demand as PB90-591781 for DOS. Issued quarterly. System:
IBM PC/AT; MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K. For
system on magnetic tape, see PB90-591790. 12 diskettes.

102

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

Subject index keywords; Data file, Hazardous materials,
Superfurid, Remedial action, Regional analysis, Waste man-
agement.

0614 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS); National
Frequency by PRP Name Report

Order Number PB92-173103CDH, price:

Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to Identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
orities List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Supersedes PB92-139526. 184p.

Subject index keywords; Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Remedial action,
Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially
responsible parties.

0615 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): National
PRP Listing Alphabetically by PRP Name

Order Number PB92-173095CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
orities List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Supersedes PB92-139518. 4770p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Remedial action,
Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially
responsible parties.

0616 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): National
PRP Listing Alphabetically by PRP Name

Order Number PB92-220136CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Jul 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites.

Specifications: Supersedes PB92-173095. 5158p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Financial
management, Law enforcement, Tracking, Superfund, Reme-
dial Action.

0617 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): National
PRP Listing by Site

Order Number PB92-173087CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
orities List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Supersedes PB92-13950C. 5215p.

Subject index keywords; Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Remedial action,
Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially
responsible parties.

0618 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): National
PRP Listing by Site

Order Number PB92-220128CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Jul 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund

103

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number, SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
orities List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The listing by site name is organized in the following
manner. Sites are sorted by state, as indicated in the site ID
number. The first two characters of the site ID number con-
stitute the state abbreviation of the site location. The listing
by party name is arranged alphabetically by the name of the
party and provides a company contact and address. Within
each record, the sites associated with the PRP are listed.
The first two characters of the site ID number constitute the
state abbreviation of the site location.

Specifications; Supersedes PB92-173087. 5611 p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Waste disposal, Directories, Hazardous materials, Site En-
forcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible parties.

0619 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): National
PRP Report by Site, September 26,1991

Order Number PB92-105352CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 26 Sep 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications; Supersedes PB91-215178. 3027p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Direc-
tories, Hazardous materials, Site Enforcement Tracking
System, Potentially responsible parties, US EPA Regions 1-
10.

0620 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (National
- 3 1/2 Inch Diskette, IBM PS/2 Compatible) (for
Microcomputers)

Order Number P092-592130CDH, price; Subscription, call for
price

Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Oct 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-

tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
dress the range of other administrative duties related to
tracking the PRP. These lists represent EPA's preliminary
findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclusion on these lists
does not constitute a final determination concerning the li-
ability of any party for the hazard or contamination at any
CERCLA ate.

Specifications: Available on subscription, U.S., Canada, and
Mexico price $1,000; price for others $2,000. Issued quarter-
ly. The datafile is on ten, 3 1/2 inch diskettes, 1.44M high
density. File format: ASCII. Also available individually; order
number PB92-592131, price DOS. System: IBM PS/2; MS
DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K. Other formats available as
IBM (or compatible) 5 1/4 inch - P890-591780. 10 diskettes.
Subject index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Superfund, Remedial action, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible par-
ties.

0621 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Alabama

Order Number PB90-243056CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP, These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Alabama where the site is
located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243049. See also PB90-243064. 12p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Alabama,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.

104

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0622 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Alabama

Order Number PB91-1307Q8CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Alabama. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130690. Supersedes PB90-243056. See also
PB91-131219. 11p,

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Alabama,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties,

0623 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Alabama

Order Number PB91-170613CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170605. Supersedes PB91-130708. See also
PB91-170621, 13p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Ala-
bama, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially respon-
sible parties.

0624 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for American Samoa

Order Number PB90-243395CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to American Samoa where the
site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243387. See also PB90-243403. 5p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, American
Samoa, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directo-
ries, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedi-
al action.

0625 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS); PRP
Listing by Site for American Samoa

Order Number PB91-131086CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for American Samoa. Data from
this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement Track-
ing System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and ad-
dress, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA ate name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites, SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-131078. Supersedes PB90-243395. See also
PB91-131094, 4p,

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site Enforce-
ment Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action, Poten-
tially responsible parties.

105

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0626 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS); PRP
Listing by Site for American Samoa

Order Number PB91-170951CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites, EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170944. Supersedes PB91-131086. See also
PB91-170969. 5p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Ameri-
can Samoa, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially
responsible parties.

0627 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Arizona

Order Number PB90-243403CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Arizona where the site is lo-
cated.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243387. See also PB90-243395 and PB90-
243411. 16p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Arizona,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.

0628 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Arizona

Order Number PB91-131094CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Arizona. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-131078. Supersedes PB90-243403. See also
PB91-131086 and PB91-131102. 19p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Arizona,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.

0629 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Arizona

Order Number PB91-170969CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice tetter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number, SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170944. Supersedes PB91-131094. See also
PB91-170951 and PB91 -170977. 24p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Arizo-
na, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsi-
ble parties.

106

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0630 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS); PRP
Listing by Site for Arkansas

Order Number PB90-243213CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA {Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS),
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Arkansas where the site is
located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243205. See also PB90-243221. 16p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Arkansas,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.

0631 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Arkansas

Order Number PB91-130906CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Arkansas. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130898. Supersedes PB90-243213. See also
PB91-130914, 16p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Arkansas,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.

0632 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Arkansas

Order Number PS91-170779CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170761. Supersedes PB91-130906. See aiso
PB91-170787. 17p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Arkan-
sas, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsi-
ble parties.

0633 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for California

Order Number PB90-243411CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter Is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to California where the site is
located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243387. See also PB90-243403 and PB90-
243429. 126p,

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, California,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.

107

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0634 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for California

Order Number PB91-131102CDH, price: PC AQ8/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of California. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-131078. Supersedes PB90-243411, See also
PB91-131094 and PB91-131110. 157p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, California,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.

0635 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for California

Order Number PB91-17C977CDH, price: PC A10/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170944. Supersedes PB91-131102. See also
PB91-170989 and PB91-170985. 21 Op.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Cali-
fornia, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially respon-
sible parties.

0636 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Colorado

Order Number PB90-243320CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Colorado where the site is
located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243312. See also PB90-243338. 65p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Colorado, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.

0637 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Colorado

Order Number PB91-131011CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Colorado. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-131003. Supersedes PB90-243320. See also
PB91-131029. 65p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Colorado,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.

108

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0638 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Colorado

Order Number PB91-170886CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91

When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170878. Supersedes PB91-131011. See also
PB91-170894. 68p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Colo-
rado, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially respon-
sible parties.

0639 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Connecticut

Order Number PB90-242884CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Connecticut where the site
is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-242876. See also PB90-242892. 31 p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Connecticut,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.

0640 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Connecticut

Order Number PB91-130534CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Connecticut.
Data from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforce-
ment Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name
and address, a company contact person, the date the notice
was issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identifi-
cation number. SETS was created to track PRP identification
at both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130526. Supersedes PB90-242884. See also
PB91-130542. 30p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Connecticut,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.

0641 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Connecticut

Order Number PB91-170449CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170431. Supersedes PB91-130534. See also
PB91 -170456. 32p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Con-
necticut, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially re-
sponsible parties.

109

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION; Enforcement

0642 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS); PRP
Listing by Site for Delaware

Order Number PB90-242991CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Delaware where the site is
located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-242983. See also PB90-243007. 28p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Delaware,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.

0643 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Delaware

Order Number PB91-130641CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Delaware. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites, SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130633. Supersedes PB90-242991. See also
PB91 -130658. 26p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Delaware,
Waste disposal. Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.

0644 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Delaware

Order Number PB91-170555CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC £99/
MF E99, PB91-170548. Supersedes PB91 -130641. See also
PB91-170563. 33p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Dela-
ware, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially respon-
sible parties,

0645 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Florida

Order Number PB90-243064CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP), Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Florida where the site Is lo-
cated.

Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243049. See also PB9Q-243056 and PB90-
243072. 37p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Florida,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.

110

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0646 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Florida

Order Number PB91-131219CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Florida. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130690, Supersedes PB90-243064. See also
PS91-130708 and PB91-130716. 39p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Florida,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.

0647 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Florida

Order Number PB91-170621CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91 -170605. Supersedes PB91-131219. See also
PB91-170613 and PB91-170639. 47p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Flori-
da, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsi-
ble parties.

0648 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Georgia

Order Number PB90-243072CDH, price; PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Georgia where the site is lo-
cated.

Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243049. See also PB90-243064 and PB90-
243080. 19p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Georgia,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.

0649 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Georgia

Order Number PB91-130716CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Georgia. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130690. Supersedes PB90-243072. See also
PB91-131219 and PB91-130724. 17p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Georgia,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.

111

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0650 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Georgia

Order Number PB91-170639CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91

When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170605. Supersedes PB91-130716. See also
PB91-170621 and PB91-170647. 20p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Geor-
gia, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsi-
ble parties.

0651 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Idaho

Order Number PB90-243460CDH, price: PC AQ2/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the Identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Idaho where the site is lo-
cated.

Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports, PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243452, See also PB90-243478. 7p,

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Idaho,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.

0652 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Idaho

Order Number PB91-131151CDH. price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Idaho. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data Includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-131144. Supersedes PB90-243460. See also
PB91-131177. 8p,

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Idaho,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.

0653 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Idaho

Order Number PB91-171Q25CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff Issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-171017. Supersedes PB91-131151. See also
PB91-171033. 10p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Idaho,
Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible
parties.

112

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0654 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Illinois

Order Number PB90-243148CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff Issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Illinois where the site is lo-
cated.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243130. See also PB90-243155. 57p,

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Illinois,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.

0655 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
listing by Site for Illinois

Order Number PB91-130781CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to Identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Illinois. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91 -130773. Supersedes PB90-243148. See also
PB91-130799. 56p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Illinois,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.

0656 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Illinois

Order Number PB91-170704CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP Information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170696. Supersedes PB91-130781. See also
PB91-170712, 59p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Illinois,
Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible
parties.

0657 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Indiana

Order Number PB90-243155CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites, EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Indiana where the site is lo-
cated.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB9G-243130. See also PB90-243148 and PB90-
243163. 137p,

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Indiana,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.

113

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0658 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Indiana

Order Number PB91-130799CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Indiana. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP,

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130773. Supersedes PB90-243155. See also
PB91-130781 and PB91-130807. 137p,

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Indiana,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.

0659 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Indiana

Order Number PB91-170712CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170696. Supersedes PB91-130799. See also
PB91-170704 and PB91-170720. 140p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Indi-
ana, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsi-
ble parties.

0660 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by ate for Iowa

Order Number PB90-243270CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Iowa where the site is locat-
ed.

Specifications: Also available in set of 4 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243262. See also PB90-243288. 25p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Iowa, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site En-
forcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.

0661 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Iowa

Order Number PB91-130963CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Iowa. Data from
this notice fetter is used to form the Site Enforcement Track-
ing System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and ad-
dress, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 4 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130955. Supersedes PB90-243270. See also
PB91-130971. 23p.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Iowa, Waste
disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site Enforce-
ment Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action, Poten-
tially responsible parties.

114

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0662 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS); PRP
Listing by Site for Iowa

Order Number PB91-170837CDH, price: PC A03/MF AQ1
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 4 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170829. Supersedes PB91-130963. See also
PB91-170845. 26p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Iowa,
Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible
parties.

0663 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Kansas

Order Number PB90-243288CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Kansas where the site is lo-
cated.

Specifications: Also available in set of 4 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243262. See also PB90-243270 and PB90-
243296. 33p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Kansas, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.

0664 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Kansas

Order Number PB91-130971CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Kansas. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 4 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91 -130955. Supersedes PB90-243288. See also
PB91-130963 and PB91-130989. 31 p,

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Kansas,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.

0665 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Kansas

Order Number PB91-170845CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and Identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 4 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170829. Supersedes PB91-130971. See also
PB91-170837 and PB91 -170852. 34p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories,
Kansas, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially re-
sponsible parties.

115

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0666 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Kentucky

Order Number PB90-243080CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites, EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS),
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Kentucky where the site is
located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243049. See also PB90-243072 and PB90-

243098. 97p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Kentucky,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.

0667 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Kentucky

Order Number PB91-130724CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Kentucky. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130690. Supersedes PB90-243098. See also
PB91-130716 and PB91-130732. 97p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Kentucky,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.

0668 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Kentucky

Order Number PB91-170647CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170605. Supersedes PB91-130724. See also
PB91-170639 and PB91-170732. 99p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Ken-
tucky, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially respon-
sible parties.

0669 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Louisiana

Order Number PB90-243221CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Louisiana where the site is
located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243205. See also PB90-243213 and PB9Q-
243239. 26p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Louisiana,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.

116

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0670 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Louisiana

Order Number PB91-130914CDH, price; PC AQ3/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Louisiana. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130898. Supersedes PB90-243221. See also
PB91 -130906 and PB91-130922. 25p,

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Louisiana,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.

0671 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Louisiana

Order Number PB91-170787CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170761. Supersedes PB91-130914. See also
PB91-170779 and PB91-170795. 26p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Louisi-
ana, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsi-
ble parties.

0672 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Maine

Order Number PB90-242892CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Maine where the site is lo-
cated.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-242876. See also PB90-242884 and PB90-
242900. 69p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Maine,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.

0673 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Maine

Order Number PB91-130542CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Maine. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130526. Supersedes PB90-242892, See also
PB91-130534 and PB91-130559. 79p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Maine,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.

117

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION; Enforcement

0674 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Maine

Order Number PB91-170456CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites, EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and Identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170431. Supersedes PB91-130542. See also
PB91-170449 and PB91-170464. 81 p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Maine,
Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible
parties.

0675 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Maryland

Order Number PB90-243007CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Maryland where the site is
located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-242983. See also PB90-242991 and PB90-
243015. 22p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Maryland,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.

0676 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Maryland

Order Number PB91-130658CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Maryland. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, aid the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130633. Supersedes PB90-243007, See also
PB91-130641 and PB91-130666. 20p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Maryland,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.

0677 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Maryland

Order Number PB91-170563CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number, SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170548. Supersedes PB91-130658. See also
PB91-170555 and PB91-170571, 27p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Mary-
land, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially respon-
sible parties.

118

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0678 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Massachusetts

Order Number PB90-24290GCDH, price: PC A10/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites, EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data Includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites, SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties, Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Massachusetts where the
site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF £99, PB90-242876. See also PB90-242892 and PB90-
242918. 219p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Massachu-
setts, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories,
Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial
action.

0679 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Massachusetts

Order Number PB91-130559CDH, price: PC A10/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement: 20 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Massachusetts-
Data from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforce-
ment Tracking System (SETS), This data includes PRP name
and address, a company contact person, the date the notice
was issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identifi-
cation number. SETS was created to track PRP identification
at both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130526. Supersedes PB90-242900. See also
PB91-130542 and PB91-130567. 220p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Massachu-
setts, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories,
Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial
action, Potentially responsible parties.

0680 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Massachusetts

Order Number PB91-170464CDH, price: PC A10/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement: 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170431. Supersedes PB91-130559. See also
PB91-170456 and PB91-170472. 220p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Mas-
sachusetts, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially
responsible parties.

0681 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Michigan

Order Number PB90-243163CDH, price: PC A08/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties, Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Michigan where the site is
located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243130. See also PB90-243155 and PB90-
243171. 158p.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Michigan,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.

119

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0682 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS); PRP
Listing by Site for Michigan

Order Number PB91-130807CDH, price: PC A08/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90

When expending Supcrfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites, EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Michigan. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS), This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number, SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130773. Supersedes PB90-243163. See also
PB91-130799 and PB91-13Q815. 158p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Michigan,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.

0683 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Michigan

Order Number PB91-17Q720CDH, price: PC A08/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170696. Supersedes PB91-130807. See also
PB91-170712 and PB91-170738. 167p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Michi-
gan, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsi-
ble parties.

0684 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Minnesota

Order Number PB9G-243171CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Minnesota where the site is
located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243130. See also PB90-243163 and PB90-
243189. 56p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Minnesota,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.

0685 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Minnesota

Order Number PB91-130815CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Minnesota. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130773. Supersedes PB90-243171. See also
PB91-130807 and PB91-130823. 55p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Minnesota,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.

120

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0686 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Minnesota

Order Number PB91-170738CDH, price: PC A04/MF AG1
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter Is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and rtorvNPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170696. Supersedes PB91-130815. See also
PB91 -170720 and PB91-170746. 57p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Minne-
sota, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially respon-
sible parties.

0687 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Mississippi

Oder Number PB90-243098CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice tetter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Mississippi where the site is
located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243049. See also PB90-243080 and PB90-
243106. 16p.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Mississippi,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.

0688 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Mississippi

Order Number PB91-130732CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Mississippi.
Data from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforce-
ment Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name
and address, a company contact person, the date the notice
was issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identifi-
cation number. SETS was created to track PRP identification
at both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130690. Supersedes PB90-243098. See also
PB91-130724 and PB91-130740. 8p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Mississippi,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.

0689 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Mississippi

Order Number PB91-170654CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170605. Supersedes PB91-130732. See also
PB91-170647 and PB91 -170662. 1Gp.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Missis-
sippi, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially respon-
sible parties.

121

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0690 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Missouri

Order Number PB90-243296CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number, SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Missouri where the site is
located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 4 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243262. See also PB90-243288 and PB90-
243304. 141 p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Missouri, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.

0691 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Missouri

Order Number PB91-130989CDH, price; PC AG7/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Missouri. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 4 reports PC £99/
MF E99, PB91-130955. Supersedes PB90-243296. See also
PB91-130971 and PB91-130997. 139p,

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Missouri,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.

0692 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PHP
Listing by Site for Missouri

Order Number PB91-170852CDH, price: PC A08/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
, used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 4 reports PC E9S/
MF E99, PB91-170829. Supersedes PB91-130989. See also
PB91-170845 and PB91-170860. 165p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Mis-
souri, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially respon-
sible parties.

0693 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Montana

Order Number PB90-243338CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Montana where the site is
located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243312. See also PB90-243320 and PB90-
243346. 13p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Montana, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.

122

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION; Enforcement

0694 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Montana

Order Number PB91-131029CDH, price; PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Montana. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-131003. Supersedes PB90-243338. See also
PB91-131011 and PB91-131Q37. 13p.

Subject index keywords; Hazardous materials, Montana,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.

0695 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Montana

Order Number PB91-170894CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91 -170878. Supersedes PB91-131029. See alsp
PB91-170886 and PB91-170902. 15p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Mon-
tana, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially respon-
sible parties.

0696 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Nebraska

Order Number PB90-243304CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Nebraska where the site is
located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 4 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243262. See also PB90-243296. 10p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Nebraska, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.

0697 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Nebraska

Order Number PB91-130997CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Nebraska. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites, SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 4 reports PC £99/
MF E99, PB91-130955. Supersedes PB90-243304. See also
PB91-130989. 8p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Nebraska,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement. Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.

123

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0698 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Nebraska

Order Number PB91-170860CDH, price; PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 4 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91 -170829. Supersedes PB91-130997. See also
PB91-170852. 10p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Ne-
braska, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially re-
sponsible parties.

0699 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Nevada

Order Number PB90-243429CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Nevada where the site is lo-
cated.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243387. See also PB90-243411 and PB90-
243437, 5p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Nevada,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.

0700 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Nevada

Order Number PB91-13111GCDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Nevada. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS), This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number, SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-131078. Supersedes PB90-243429. See also
PB91-131102 and PB91-131128. 4p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Nevada,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.

0701 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Nevada

Order Number PB91-170985CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify partes
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170944. Supersedes PB91-131110, See also
PB91-170977 and PB91-170993. 7p,

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories,
Nevada, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially re-
sponsible parties.

124

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0702 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for New Hampshire

Order Number PB90-242918CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to New Hampshire where the
site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-242876. See also PB90-242900 and PB90-
242926. 109p.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, New Hamp-
shire, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories,
Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial
action.

0703 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for New Hampshire

Order Number PB91-130567CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites, EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of New Hamp-
shire. Data from this notice letter is used to form the Site En-
forcement Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP
name and address, a company contact person, the date the
notice was issued, and the related CERCLA site name and
identification number. SETS was created to track PRP identi-
fication at both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL
sites. SETS does not address the range of other administra-
tive duties related to tracking the PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130526. Supersedes PB90-242918. See also
PB91-130559 and PB91-130575. 109p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, New Hamp-
shire, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories,
Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial
action, Potentially responsible parties.

0704 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for New Hampshire

Order Number PB91-170472CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170431. Supersedes PB91-130567, See also
PB91-130559 and PB91-170480. 109p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, New
Hampshire, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially
responsible parties.

0705 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for New Jersey

Order Number PB90-242959CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to New Jersey where the site
is located.

Specifications: Aiso available in set of 3 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-242942. See also PB90-242942 and PB90-
242967. 128p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, New Jersey,
Coordinated procurement, Directories, Waste disposal, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Remedial action, Superfund.

125

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0706 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for New Jersey

Order Number PB91-130609CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90

Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91 -130591. Supersedes PB90-242959. See also
PB91-130617. 126p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, New Jersey,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.

0707 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for New Jersey

Order Number PB91-170514CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was Issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91 -170506. Supersedes PB91-130609. See also
PB91 -170522. 128p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, New
Jersey. Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially re-
sponsible parties.

0708 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SITS): PRP
Listing by Site for New Mexico

Order Number PB90-243239CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90

When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter Is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL {National Pri-
. ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP, These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to New Mexico where the site
is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243205. See also PB90-243221 and PB90-
243247. 9p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, New
Mexico, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directo-
ries, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedi-
al action.

0709 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for New Mexico

Order Number PB91-130922CDH. price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of New Mexico.
Data from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforce-
ment Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name
and address, a company contact person, the date the notice
was issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identifi-
cation number. SETS was created to track PRP identification
at both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130898. Supersedes PB90-243239. See also
PB91-130914 and PB91-130930. 8p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, New
Mexico, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directo-
ries, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedi-
al action, Potentially responsible parties.

126

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0710 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS); PRP
Listing by Site for New Mexico

Order Number PB91-170795CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170761. Supersedes PB91-130922. See also
PB91 -170787 and PB91-170803. 9p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, New
Mexico, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially re-
sponsible parties.

0711 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PHP
Listing by Site for New York

Order Number PB90-242967CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to New York where the site is
located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-242942. See also PB90-242959 and PB90-
242975. 33p.

Subject index keywords; Hazardous materials, New York,
Coordinated procurement, Directories, Waste disposal, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Remedial action, Superfund.

0712 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for New York

Order Number PB91-130617CDH, price; PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of New York. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130591. Supersedes PB90-242967. See also
PB91-130609 and PB91-130625. 30p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, New York,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.

0713 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for New York

Order Number PB91-170522CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170506. Supersedes PB91-130617. See also
PB91-170514 and PB91-170530. 32p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, New
York, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially respon-
sible parties.

127

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION; Enforcement

0714 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for North Carolina

Order Number PB90-243106CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90

When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to North Carolina where the
site is located.

Specifications; Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243049. See also PB90-243098 and PB90-
243114. 31 p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, North Caro-
lina, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories,
Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial
action.

0715 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for North Carolina

Order Number PB91-13074QCDH, price; PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of North Carolina.
Data from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforce-
ment Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name
and address, a company contact person, the date the notice
was issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identifi-
cation number. SETS was created to track PRP identification
at both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130690. Supersedes PB90-243106. See also
PB91-130732 and PB91-130757. 29p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, North Caro-
lina, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories,
Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial
action, Potentially responsible parties.

0716 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for North Carolina

Order Number PB91-170662CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170605. Supersedes PB91-130740. See also
PB91-170654 and PB91-170670. 31p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, North
Carolina, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially re-
sponsible parties.

0717 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for North Dakota

Order Number PB90-243346CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to North Dakota where the site
is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243312. See also PB90-243338 and PB90-
243353. 7p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, North Dakota, Coordinated procurement, Directories,

128

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION; Enforcement

Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial
action,

0718 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
listing by Site for North Dakota

Order Number PB91-131037CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of North Dakota.
Data from this notice ietter is used to form the Site Enforce-
ment Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name
and address, a company contact person, the date the notice
was Issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identifi-
cation number. SETS was created to track PRP identification
at both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-131003. Supersedes PB90-243346. See also
PB91 -131029 and PB91 -131045. 7p.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, North
Dakota, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directo-
ries, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedi-
al action, Potentially responsible parties.

0719 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for North Dakota

Order Number PB91-170902CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170878. Supersedes PB91-131037. See also
PB91-170894 and PB91-170910. 8p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, North
Dakota, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially re-
sponsible partes.

0720 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Northern Marianas

Order Number PB90-243437CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Northern Mariana Islands
where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243387. See also PB90-243429 and PB90-
243445. Sp,

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Mariana Is-
lands, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories,
Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial
action.

0721 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site lor Northern Marianas

Order Number PB91-131128CDH, price: PC A01 /MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the Northern Mariana Is-
lands. Data from this notice letter is used to form the Site
Enforcement Tracking System (SETS). This data includes
PRP name and address, a company contact person, the date
the notice was issued, and the related CERCLA site name
and identification number. SETS was created to track PRP
identification at both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL
sites. SETS does not address the range of other administra-
tive duties related to tracking the PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-131078, Supersedes PB90-243437. See also
PB91-131110 and PB91-131136. 4p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Mariana Is-
lands, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories,
Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial
action, Potentially responsible parties.

129

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0722 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS); PRP
Listing by Site for Northern Marianas

Order Number PB91-170993CDH, price; PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites, EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS),
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170944. Supersedes PB91-131128. See also
PB91-170985 and P891-171009. 5p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Marl-
ana Islands, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially
responsible parties.

0723 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Ohio

Order Number PB90-243189CDH, price: PC AG6/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Ohio where the site is locat-
ed.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243130. See also PB90-243171 and PB90-
243197. 105p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Ohio, Waste
disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site Enforce-
ment Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.

0724 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Ohio

Order Number PB91-130823CDH, price; PC AQ6/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Ohio. Data from
this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement Track-
ing System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and ad-
dress, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130773. Supersedes PB90-243189. See also
PB91-130815 and PB91-130831. 104p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Ohio, Waste
disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site Enforce-
ment Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action, Poten-
tially responsible parties.

0725 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing bv Site for Ohio

Order Number PB91-170746CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites, EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP), Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170696. Supersedes PB91-130823. See also
PB91-170736 and PB91-170753. 115p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Ohio,
Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible
parties.

130

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0726 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Oklahoma

Order Number PB90-243247CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Oklahoma where the site is
located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243205. See also PB90-243239 and PB90-
243254. 69p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Oklahoma,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,

072? Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Oklahoma

Order Number PB91-130930CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Oklahoma. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130898. Supersedes PB90-243247. See also
PB91-130922 and PB91-130948. 68p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Oklahoma,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.

0728 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Oklahoma

Order Number PB91-170803CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170761. Supersedes PB91-130930. See also
PB91-170795 and PB91-170811. 69p.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Okla-
homa, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially respon-
sible parties.

0729 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Oregon

Order Number PB90-243478CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice tetter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter Is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Oregon where the site is lo-
cated.

Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243452. See also PB90-243460 and PB90-
243486. 6p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Oregon,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.

131

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0730 Site Enforcement Trackfng System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Oregon

Order Number PB91-131169CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90

Specifications: Also available in set of 3 report PC E99/MF
E99, PB91-131144. Supersedes PB90-243478. See also
PB91-131151 and PB91-131177. 5p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Oregon,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.

0731 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Oregon

Order Number PB91-171033CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91

When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number, SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-171017. Supersedes PB91-131169. See also
PB91 -171025 and PB91-171041. 7p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories,
Oregon, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially re-
sponsible parties.

0732 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Pennsylvania

Order Number PB90-243015CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90

When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Pennsylvania where the site
is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-242983. See also PB90-243007 and PB90-
243023. 140p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pennsylva-
nia, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories,
Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial
action.

0733 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Pennsylvania

Order Number PB91-130666CDH. price: PC A10/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90

Specifications; Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130633. Supersedes PB90-243015. See also
PB91-130658 and PB91-130674. 208p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pennsylva-
nia, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories,
Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial
action, Potentially responsible parties.

132

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0734 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Pennsylvania

Order Number PB91-170571CDH, price: PC A10/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites, EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170548. Supersedes PB91-130666. See also
PB91-170658 and PB91-170589. 220p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Penn-
sylvania, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially re-
sponsible parties.

0735 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Puerto Rico

Order Number PB90-242975CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites, EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Puerto Rico where the site
is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-242942. See also PB90-242967. 6p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Puerto Rico,
Coordinated procurement, Directories, Waste disposal, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Remedial action, Superfund.

0736 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Puerto Rico

Order Number PB91-130625CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 20 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site. EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for Puerto Rico. Data from this
notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking
System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and address,
a company contact person, the date the notice was issued,
and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130591. Supersedes PB90-242975. See also
PB91-130617. 4p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site Enforce-
ment Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action, Poten-
tially responsible parties.

0737 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Puerto Rico

Order Number PB91-170530CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites, EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice tetter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170506. Supersedes PB91-130625, See also
PB91-170522. 6p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Puerto
Rico, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially respon-
sible parties.

133

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0738 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 1

Order Number PB92-173111CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites, EPA regional Superfund
Waste Managment Staff issue a notice letter to the potential-
ly responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
orities List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located. Region 1 includes Connecti-
cut, Massachusetts, Maine, New Hampshire, Rhode Island
and Vermont.

Specifications: Supersedes PB92-139534. 874p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials, Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking
System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 1.

0739 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 1

Order Number PB92-2Z0029CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Jul 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites.

Specifications: Supersedes PB92-173111. 882p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Financial
management, Law enforcement, Tracking, Superfund, Reme-
dial Action.

0740 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 1

Order Number PB93-177145CDH, price; Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 93
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice tetter is

Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
PB93-177137. Supersedes PB93-134203. See also PB93-
177152.1194p.

Subject Index keywords: Law enforcement, Superfund,

Sites, Waste management, Potential responsible party.

0741 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 1, January 22,1992

Order Number PB92-139534CDH, price: PC A12
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 22 Jan 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites.

Specifications: Supersedes PB92-105246. 258p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Directories, Superfund, Potentially responsible parties,
USEPA region 1.

0742 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 1, Volume 1

Order Number PB93-134203CDH. price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 9 Dec 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
PB93-134195. Supersedes PB92-220029. See also Volume
2, P893-134211. 1188p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Waste disposal, Directories, Hazardous materials, Site En-
forcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible parties.

134

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION; Enforcement

0743 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 2

Order Number PB92-173129CDH, price: PC A24
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
orities List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located. Region 2 includes New
Jersey, New York, Puerto Rico, and Virgin Islands.
Specifications; Supersedes PB92-139542. 572p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials, Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking
System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 2.

0744 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 2

Order Number PB92-220Q37CDH, price; PC A25/MF A06
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Jul 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites.

Specifications: Supersedes PB92-173129. 577p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Financial
management, Law enforcement, Tracking, Superfund, Reme-
dial Action.

0745 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 2

Order Number PB93-177152CDH, price; PC A24
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 93
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).

The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number.

Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
PB93-177137. Supersedes PB93-134211. See also PB93-
177145 and PB93-177160. 575p.

Subject index keywords: Law enforcement, Superfund,
Sites, Waste management, Potential responsible party.

0746 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 2, January 22, 1992

Order Number PB92-139542CDH, price: PC A17
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 22 Jan 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Ac I) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP), Data from the notice Setter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. Region 2 includes New Jersey,
New York, Puerto Rico, and Virgin Islands. There are no
sites in this state/territory at this time.

Specifications: Supersedes PB92-105253. 387p,

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Directories, Superfund, Potentially responsible parties,
US EPA region 2.

0747 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 2. Volume 2

Order Number PB93-134211CDH, price: PC A24
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 9 Dec 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
PB93-134195. Supersedes PB92-220037. See also Volume
1, PB93-134203 and Volume 3, PB93-134229. 574p,

Subject index keywords; Superfund, Remedial action,
Waste disposal, Directories, Hazardous materials, Site En-
forcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible parties.

135

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0748 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS); PRP
Listing by Site for Region 3

Order Number PB92-173137CDH, price: PC A22
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 92
When expanding Superfund monies at a CERCIA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
orities List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located. Region 3 includes Delaware,
District of Columbia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and
West Virginia.

Specifications: Supersedes PB92-139559. 525p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials, Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking
System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 3.

0749 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 3

Order Number PB93-177160CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 93
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number.

Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
PB93-177137. Supersedes PB93-134229. See also PB93-
177152 and PB93-177178. 616p.

Subject Index keywords: Law enforcement, Superfund,
Sites, Waste management, Potential responsible party.

0750 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 3, January 22, 1992

Order Number PB92-139559CDH, price: PC A16
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 22 Jan 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).

The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. Region 3 includes Delaware,
District of Columbia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and
West Virginia. There are no sites in the federal district at this
time.

Specifications: Supersedes PB92-105261. 372p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Directories, Superfund, Potentially responsible parties,
USEPA region 3.

0751 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 3. Volume 3

Order Number PB93-134229CDH, price: PC A25
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 9 Dec 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS),
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites, SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
PB93-134195. Supersedes PB92-220045. See also Volume
2, PB93-134211 and Volume 4, PB93-134237. 588p.

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Waste disposal, Directories, Hazardous materials, Site En-
forcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible parties.

0752 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 4

Order Number PB92-173145CDH, price: PC A16
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites, EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter Is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
orities List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located. Region 4 includes Alabama,

136

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South
Carolina, and Tennessee,

Specifications; Supersedes PB92-139567. 352p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials, Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking
System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 4.

0753 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS); PRP
Listing by Site for Region 4

Order Number PB92-220052GDH, price: PC A18/MF A04
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Jul 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites.

Specifications: Supersedes PB92-173145. 407p,

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Financial
management, Law enforcement, Tracking, Superfund, Reme-
dial Action.

0754 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 4

Order Number PB93-177178CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 93
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, company contact
person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number.

Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
PB93-177137. Supersedes PB93-134237. See also PB93-
177160 and PB93-177186. 842p.

Subject index keywords: Law enforcement, Superfund,
Sites, Waste management, Potential responsible party.

0755 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 4, January 22, 1992

Order Number PB92-139567CDH, price: PC A12
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 22 Jan 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is

used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number, SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. These lists for Region 4 in-
cludes Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi,
North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92-105279. 256p.

Subject index keywords: Waste disposal, Hazardous mate-
rials, Directories, Superfund.

0756 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 4. Volume 4

Order Number PB93-134237CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 9 Dec 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
PB93-134195. Supersedes PB92-220052. See also Volume
3, PB93-134229 and Volume 5, PB93-134245. 656p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Waste disposal, Directories, Hazardous materials, Site En-
forcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible parties.

0757 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 5

Order Number PB92-173152CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
orities List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located. Region 5 includes Illinois, In-
diana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, and Wisconsin.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92-139575.1022p.

137

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal. Haz-
ardous materials, Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking
System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 5.

0758 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 5

Order Number PB92-220Q6QCDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Jul 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice latter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites.

Specifications: Supersedes PB92-173152. 1462p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Financial
management, Law enforcement. Tracking, Superfund, Reme-
dial Action.

0759 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 5

Order Number PB93-177186CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 93
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP), Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS),
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number.

Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
P393-177137. Supersedes PB93-134245. See also PB93-
177178 and PB93-177194. 1590p.

Subject Index keywords: Law enforcement, Superfund,
Sites, Waste management, Potential responsible party.

0760 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 5, January 22,1992

Order Number PB92-139575CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 22 Jan 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related

CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites.

Specifications: Supersedes PB92-105287. 720p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Directories, Superfund, Potentially responsible parties,
US EPA region 5.

0761 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 5. Volume 5

Order Number PB93-134245CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 9 Dec 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
PB93-134195. Supersedes PB92-220060. See also Volume
4, PB93-134237 and Volume 6, PB93-134252. 1128p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Waste disposal, Directories, Hazardous materials, Site En-
forcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible parties.

0762 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 6

Order Number PB92-173160CDH, price: PC A17
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
orities List) and non-NPL sites, SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located. Region 6 includes Arkansas,
Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92-139583. 394p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials, Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking
System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 6.

138

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0763 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 6

Order Number PB92-220078CDH, price: PC A17/MF A04
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Jul 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA {Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites.

Specifications; Supersedes PB92-173160. 398p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Financial
management, Law enforcement, Tracking, Superfund, Reme-
dial Action.

0764 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 6

Order Number PB93-177194COH, price: PC A17
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 93
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice tetter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number.

Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
PB93-177137. Supersedes PB93-134252. See also PB93-
177186 and PB93-177202. 398p.

Subject index keywords: Law enforcement, Superfund,
Sites, Waste management, Potential responsible party.

0765 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 6, January 22,1992

Order Number PB92-139583CDH, price: PC A12
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 22 Jan 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites.

Specifications: Supersedes PB92-105295. 269p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Directories, Superfund, Potentially responsible parties,
US EPA region 6.

0766 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 6. Volume 6

Order Number PB93-134252CDH, price: PC A17
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 9 Dec 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
PB93-134195. Supersedes PB92-220078. See also Volume
5, PB93-134245 and Volume 7, PB93-134260. 396p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Waste disposal, Directories, Hazardous materials, Site En-
forcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible parties.

0767 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 7

Order Number PB92-173178CDH, price: PC A17
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
orities List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located. Region 7 includes Iowa,
Kansas, Missouri, and Nebraska.

Specifications: Supersedes PB92-139591. 398p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials, Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking
System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 7,

139

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0768 Site Enforcement Tracking System {SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 7

Order Number PB92-220086CDH, price: PC A18/MF A04
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Jul 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites, EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice tetter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites.

Specifications: Supersedes PB92-173178. 404p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Financial
management, Law enforcement, Tracking, Superfund, Reme-
dial Action.

0769 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 7

Order Number PB93-177202CDH, price: PC A18
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 93
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number.

Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
PB93-177137. Supersedes PB93-134260. See also PB93-
177194 and PB93-177210. 41 Op.

Subject index keywords: Law enforcement, Superfund,
Sites, Waste management, Potential responsible party.

0770 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 7, January 22, 1992

Order Number PB92-139591CDH, price: PC A12
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 22 Jan 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identity parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites.

Specifications: Supersedes PB92-105303. 270p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Directories, Superfund, Potentially responsible parties,
USEPA region 7.

0771 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 7. Volume 7

Order Number PB93-134260CDH, price: PC A17
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 9 Dec 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identity parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites, EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
PB93-134195. Supersedes PB92-220086. See also Volume
6, PB93-134252 and Volume 8, PB93-134278. 400p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Waste disposal, Directories, Hazardous materials, Site En-
forcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible parties.

0772 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 8

Order Number PB92-173186CDH, price: PC A12
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
orities List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located. Region 8 includes Colorado,
Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92-139609. 265p.

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking
System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 8.

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0773 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 8

Order Number PB92-220094CDH, price: PC A14/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Ju! 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites.

Specifications: Supersedes PB92-173186. 302p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Financial
management, Law enforcement, Tracking, Superfund, Reme-
dial Action.

0774 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 8

Order Number PB93-177210CDH, price: PC A16
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 93
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP), Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number.

Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
PB93-177137. Supersedes PB93-134278. See also PB93-
177202 and PB93-177228. 359p.

Subject index keywords: Law enforcement, Superfund,
Sites, Waste management, Potential responsible party.

0775 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 8, January 22, 1992

Order Number PB92-139609CDH, price: PC A06
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 22 Jan 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites.

Specifications: Supersedes PB92-105311. 117p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Directories, Superfund, Potentially responsible parties,
USEPA region 8.

0776 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 8. Volume 8

Order Number P893-134278CDH, price: PC A15
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 9 Dec 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
P893-134195, Supersedes PB92-220094. See also Volume
7, PB93-134260 and Volume 9, PB93-134286. 346p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Waste disposal, Directories, Hazardous materials, Site En-
forcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible parties.

0777 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 9

Order Number PB92-173194CDH, price; PC A17
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
orities List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located. Region 9 includes American
Samoa, Arizona, California, Guam, Hawaii, Midway, Nevada,
Northern Marianas, Pacific Islands, Trust Territories, and
Wake Island.

Specifications: Supersedes PB92-139617. 382p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials, Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking
System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 9.

141

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0778 Site Enforcement Tracking System {SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 9

Order Number P392-220102CDH, price: PC A18/MF A04
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Jul 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites, EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
orities List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. Region 9 includes American Samoa, Arizona, Califor-
nia, Guam, Hawaii, Midway, Nevada, Northern Marianas, Pa-
cific Islands, Trust Territories, and Wake Island.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92-173194. 402p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Remedial action, Directories, Site Enforce-
ment Tracking System, Potentially responsible parties.

0779 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 9

Order Number PB93-177228CDH, price; PC A20
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 93
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number.

Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
PB93-177137. Supersedes PB93-134286. See also PB93-
177210 and PB93-177236. 471 p.

Subject index keywords: Law enforcement, Superfund,
Sites, Waste management, Potential responsible party.

0780 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 9, January 22, 1992

Order Number PB92-139617CDH, price: PC A12
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 22 Jan 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice tetter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related

CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. There are no sites in this state/
territory at this time.

Specifications: Supersedes PB92-105329. 261 p.

Subject Index keywords; Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Directories, Superfund, Potentially responsible parties,
US EPA region 9.

0781 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 9. Volume 9

Order Number PB93-134286CDH, price: PC A18
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 9 Dec 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP), Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP.

Specifications*. Also available in set of 10 reports PC A9B,
PB93-134195. Supersedes PB92-220102. See also Volume
8, PB93-134278 and Volume 10, PB93-134294. 415p.
Subject index keywords; Superfund, Remedial action,
Waste disposal, Directories, Hazardous materials, Site En-
forcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible parties.

0782 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 10

Order Number PB92-173202CDH, price: PC A12
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
orities List) and non-NPL sites, SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located. Region 10 includes Alaska,
Idaho, Oregon, and Washington.

Specifications: Supersedes PB92-139625. 271 p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials, Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking
System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 10.

142

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0783 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 10

Order Number PB92-220110CDH, price: PC A12/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Jul 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parlies
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites.

Specifications: Supersedes PB92-173202. 274p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Financial
management, Law enforcement, Tracking, Superfund, Reme-
dial Action.

0784 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 10

Order Number PB93-177236CDH, price: PC A14
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 93
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number.

Specifications; Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
PB93-177137. Supersedes PB93-134294. See also PB93-
177228. 312p.

Subject index keywords: Law enforcement, Superfund,
Sites, Waste management, Potential responsible party.

0785 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 10, January 22,1992

Order Number PB92-139625CDH, price; PC A13
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 22 Jan 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number, SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. Region 10 includes Alaska,

Idaho, Oregon, and Washington. There are no sites in this
state/territory at this time.

Specifications: Supersedes PB92-105337. 282p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Directories, Superfund, Potentially responsible parties,
US EPA region 10.

0786 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Region 10. Volume 10

Order Number PB93-134294CDH, price: PC A12
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 9 Dec 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS),
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC A99,
PB93-134195. Supersedes PB92-220110. See also Volume
9, PB93-134286. 274p.

Subject index keywords Superfund, Remedial action,
Waste disposal, Directories, Hazardous materials, Site En-
forcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible parties.

0787 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Rhode Island

Order Number PB90-242926CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties, Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Rhode Island where the site
is located.

143

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION; Enforcement

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-242876. See also PB90-242918 and PB90-
242934. 32p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Rhode
Island, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directo-
ries, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedi-
al action.

0788 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Rhode Island

Order Number PB91-130575CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to Identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Rhode Island.
Data from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforce-
ment Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name
and address, a company contact person, the date the notice
was issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identifi-
cation number. SETS was created to track PRP identification
at both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP,

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130526. Supersedes PB90-242926. See also
PB91-130567 and PB91-130583. 38p.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Rhode
Island, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directo-
ries, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedi-
al action, Potentially responsible parties.

0789 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Rhode Island

Order Number PB91-17048QCDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170431. Supersedes PB91-130575. See also
PB91-170472 and PB91-170498. 40p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Rhode

Island, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially re-
sponsible parties.

0790 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for South Carolina

Order Number PB90-243114CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to South Carolina where the
site is located.

Specifications: Aiso available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243049. See also PB90-243106 and PB90-
243122. 24p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, South Caro-
lina, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories,
Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial
action.

0791 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for South Carolina

Order Number PB91-130757CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of South Carolina.
Data from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforce-
ment Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name
and address, a company contact person, the date the notice
was issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identifi-
cation number. SETS was created to track PRP identification
at both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130690. Supersedes PB90-243114. See also
PB91-130740 and PB91-130765, 23p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, South Caro-
lina, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories,

144

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial
action, Potentially responsible parties.

0792 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for South Carolina

Order Number PB91-170670CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91

When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170605. Supersedes PB91-130757. See also
PB91-170654 and PB91-170688. 26p.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, South
Carolina, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially re-
sponsible parties.

0793 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for South Dakota

Order Number PB90-243353CDH, price: PC AG1/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90

When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP), Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to South Dakota where the
site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243312. See also PB90-243346 and PB90-
243361. 4p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, South
Dakota, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directo-
ries, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedi-
al action.

0794 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for South Dakota

Order Number PB91-131045CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to Identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of South Dakota.
Data from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforce-
ment Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name
and address, a company contact person, the date the notice
was issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identifi-
cation number. SETS was created to track PRP identification
at both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-131003. Supersedes PB90-243353. See also
PB91-131037 and PB91-131052. 4p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, South
Dakota, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directo-
ries, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedi-
al action, Potentially responsible parties.

0795 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for South Dakota

Order Number PB91-170910CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report Is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170878. Supersedes PB91-131045. See also
PB91-170902 and PB91-170928. 6p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, South
Dakota, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially re-
sponsible parties.

145

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0796 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Tennessee

Order Number PB90-243122CDH, price; PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90

When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Tennessee where the site is
located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243049. See also PB90-243114. 9p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Tennessee,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.

0797 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Tennessee

Order Number PB91-130765CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Tennessee.
Data from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforce-
ment Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name
and address, a company contact person, the date the notice
was issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identifi-
cation number. SETS was created to track PRP identification
at both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130690. Supersedes PB90-243122. See also
PB91 -130757. 9p.

Subject index keywords; Hazardous materials, Tennessee,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.

0798 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Tennessee

Order Number P391-170688CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91

When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 8 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170605. Supersedes PB91-130765. See also
PB91-170670. 11p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Ten-
nessee, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially re-
sponsible parties.

0799 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Texas

Order Number PB90-243254CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90

When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Texas where the site is lo-
cated.

Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243205. See also PB90-243247. 89p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Texas,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.

146

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0800 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Texas

Order Number PB91-130948CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90

Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130898. Supersedes PB90-243254. See also
PB91-130930. 88p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Texas,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties,

0801 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Texas

Order Number PB91-170811CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170761. Supersedes PB91-130948. See also
PB91-170803. 89p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Texas,
Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible
parties.

0802 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Trust Territories

Order Number PB90-243445CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP), Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Trust Territories where the
site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243387. See also PB90-243437. 5p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials. Trust Terri-
tory of the Pacific Islands, Waste disposal, Coordinated pro-
curement, Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking System,
Superfund, Remedial action.

0803 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Trust Territories

Order Number PB91-131136CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the Trust Territories. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-131078. Supersedes PB90-243445. See also
PB91-131128. 4p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Trust Terri-
tories, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories,
Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial
action, Potentially responsible parties, Trust Territory of the
Pacific Islands.

147

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0804 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Trust Territories

Order Number PB91-171009CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170944. Supersedes PB91-131136. See also
PB91-170993. 5p.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Trust
territory of the Pacific Islands, Site Enforcement Tracking
System, Potentially responsible parties.

0805 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Utah

Order Number PB90-243361CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Utah where the site is locat-
ed.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243312. See also PB90-243353 and PB90-
243379. 14p.

Subject index keywords; Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Utah, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site En-
forcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.

0806 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Utah

Order Number PB91-131052CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Utah. Data from
this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement Track-
ing System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and ad-
dress, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites, SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-131003. Supersedes PB90-243361. See also
PB91-131045 and PB91-131060. 14p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Utah, Waste
disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site Enforce-
ment Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action, Poten-
tially responsible parties.

0807 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Utah

Order Number PB91-170928CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170878. Supersedes PB91-131052. See also
PB91-170910 and PB91-170936. 16p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Utah,
Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible
parties.

148

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0808 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Vermont

Order Number PB90-242934CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Vermont where the site is
located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-242876. See also PB90-242926. 11 p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Vermont,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.

0809 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Vermont

Order Number PB91-130583CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Vermont. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP,

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130526. Supersedes PB9Q-242934. See also
PB91-130575. 9p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Vermont,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.

0810 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Vermont

Order Number PB91-170498CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170431. Supersedes PB91-130583. See also
PB91-170480. 11 p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Ver-
mont, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially respon-
sible parties.

0811 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Virginia

Order Number PB91-130674CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Virginia. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and Identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130633. Supersedes PB90-243023. See also
PB91-130666 and PB91-130682. 25p.

Subject index keywords; Hazardous materials, Virginia,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.

149

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0812 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Virginia

Order Number P891-170589CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites, EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP), Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170548. Supersedes PB91-130674. See also
PB91-170571 and PB91-170587. 32p.

Subject index keywords; Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Virgin-
ia, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible
parties.

0813 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Washington

Order Number PB90-243486CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Washington where the site
is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243452. See also PB90-243478. 119p.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials,
Washington(State), Waste disposal, Coordinated procure-
ment, Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Super-
fund, Remedial action.

0814 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Washington

Order Number PB91-131177CDH, price; PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Washington.
Data from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforce-
ment Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name
and address, a company contact person, the date the notice
was issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identifi-
cation number. SETS was created to track PRP identification
at both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites, SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-131144. Supersedes PB91-243486. See also
PB91-131169. 120p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials,
Washington(State), Waste disposal, Coordinated procure-
ment, Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Super-
fund, Remedial action, Potentially responsible parties.

0815 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Washington

Order Number PB91-171041CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-171017. Supersedes PB91-131177. See also
PB91-171033. 147p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories,
Washington(State), Site Enforcement Tracking System, Po-
tentially responsible parties.

150

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0816 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for West Virginia

Order Number PB90-243031CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA {Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to West Virginia where the site
is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-242983. See also PB90-243023. 14p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, West Virgin-
ia, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories,
Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial
action.

0817 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for West Virginia

Order Number PB91-130682CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of West Virginia.
Data from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforce-
ment Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name
and address, a company contact person, the date the notice
was issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identifi-
cation number. SETS was created to track PRP identification
at both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130633. Supersedes PB90-243031. See also
PB91-130674. 12p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, West Virgin-
ia, Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories,
Site Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial
action, Potentially responsible parties.

0818 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for West Virginia

Order Number PB91-170597CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170548. Supersedes PB91-130682. See also
PB91-170589. 15p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, West
Virginia, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially re-
sponsible parties.

0819 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Wisconsin

Order Number PB90-243197CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Wisconsin where the site is
located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243130. See also PB90-243189. 44p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Wisconsin,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.

151

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0820 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Wisconsin

Order Number PB91-130831CDH, price; PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending SuperfuncJ monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Wisconsin. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-130773. Supersedes PB90-243205. See also
PB91-130623. 54p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Wisconsin,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.

0821 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Wisconsin

Order Number PB91-170753CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170696. Supersedes PB91-130831. See also
PB91-170746. 58p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures. Directories, Wis-
consin, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially re-
sponsible parties.

0822 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Wyoming

Order Number PB90-243379CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Wyoming where the site is
located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-243312. See also PB90-243361. 5p,

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Wyoming, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.

0823 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Wyoming

Order Number PB91-131060CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP) for the state of Wyoming. Data
from this notice letter is used to form the Site Enforcement
Tracking System (SETS). This data includes PRP name and
address, a company contact person, the date the notice was
issued, and the related CERCLA site name and identification
number. SETS was created to track PRP identification at
both NPL (National Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS
does not address the range of other administrative duties re-
lated to tracking the PRP.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-131003. Supersedes PB90-243379. See also
PB91-131052. 5p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Wyoming,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,
Potentially responsible parties.

152

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0824 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Listing by Site for Wyoming

Order Number PB91-170936CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites, SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Also available in set of 6 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB91-170878. Supersedes PB91-131060. See also
PB91-170928. 7p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Wyo-
ming, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially respon-
sible parties.

0825 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
National Frequency by Party Name, January 22, 1992

Order Number PB92-139518CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 22 Jan 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP.

Specifications: Supersedes PB92-105360. 4130p.

Subject index keywords; Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking System, Poten-
tially responsible parties, Superfund.

0826 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
National Listing Alphabetically by Party Name

Order Number PB9Q-242850CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-

controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter Is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The alpha report fists the
PRPs in alphabetical order and links the records with the
site(s) where potential liability is associated.

Specifications: 2395p.

Subject index keywords; Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Industries, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.

0827 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
National Listing Alphabetically by Party Name

Order Number PB91-130492CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 80
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP.

Specifications: Supersedes PB90-242850. 2565p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site Enforce-
ment Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action, Poten-
tially responsible partes.

0828 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
National Listing Alphabetically by Party Name

Order Number PB91-170415CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related

153

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION; Enforcement

CERCLA site name and identification number, SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The alpha report lists the PRPs in alphabetical order
and links the records with the site(s) where potential liability
is associated.

Specifications: Supersedes PB91-130492. 2753p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System.

0829 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
National Listing Alphabetically by Party Name

Order Number PB93-134187CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 8 Dec 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP.

Specifications: Supersedes PB92-220136. 5887p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Waste disposal, Directories, Hazardous materials, Site En-
forcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible parties.

0830 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS); PRP
National Listing Alphabetically by Party Name

Order Number PB93-177129CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 93
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number.

Specifications: Supersedes PB93-134187. 3QQ0p.

Subject index keywords: Law enforcement, Hazardous ma-
terials, Sites, Superfund, Waste management, Potential re-
sponsible party.

0831 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
National Listing Alphabetically by Party Name, January
22, 1992

Order Number PB92-139526CDH, price: PC A09
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 22 Jan 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites, EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites.

Specifications: Supersedes PB92-105345. 184p,

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Directories, Superfund, Potentially responsible parties,
USEPA regions 1-10.

0832 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
National Listing by Site

Order Number PB90-242843CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Water
and Land Div; 2 Aug 90

When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites, EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to the state where the site is
located.

Specifications: 2290p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site Enforce-
ment Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action,

0833 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
National Listing by Site

Order Number PB91-131334CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 19 Dec 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-

154

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site.

Specifications; Supersedes PB90-242843. 2446p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Alabama, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Potentially re-
sponsible parties, Remedial action.

0834 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
National Listing by Site

Order Number PB91 -170407CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 5 Apr 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issued a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located.

Specifications: Supersedes PB91-131334. 2620p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Notification procedures, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible par-
ties,

0835 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SITS): PRP
National Listing by Site

Order Number PB93-134195CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Dec 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).

This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PR P.

Specifications: Set includes PB93-134203 through PB93-
134294. Supersedes PB92-22012S. 11542p-in 10v.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Waste disposal, Directories, Hazardous materials, Site En-
forcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible parties.

0836 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
National listing by Site

Order Number PB93-177137CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Apr 93
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number.

Specifications: Set includes PB93-177145 through PB93-
177236. Supersedes PB93-134195. 6767p-in 10v.

Subject index keywords: Law enforcement, Superfund,
Sites, Waste management, Potential responsible party.

0837 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
National Listing by Site, January 22,1992

Order Number PB92-139500CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 22 Jan 92
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites.

Specifications: Supersedes PB92-105352. 3346p,

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Directories, Superfund, Potentially responsible parties,
USEPA regions 1-10.

155

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION!; Enforcement

0838 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Report by Site for Region 1, September 26,1991

Order Number PB92-105246CDH, price: PC A21
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 26 Sep 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites, EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was Issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located. Region 1 includes Connecti-
cut, Massachusetts, Maine, New Hampshire, Rhode Island
and Vermont.

Specifications: Supersedes PB92-215194 through PB91-
215244 and PB91-2158G6. See also PB92-105337. 499p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials, Directories, Site Enforcment Tracking
System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 1.

0839 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Report by Site for Region 2, September 26, 1991

Order Number PB92-105253CDH, price: PC A09
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 26 Sep 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP), Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP, The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located. Region 2 includes New
Jersey, New York, Puerto Rico, and Virgin Islands.
Specifications: Supersedes PB91-215251 through PB91-
215277 and PB91-170530. See also PB92-105246. 196p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials, Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking
System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 2.

0840 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Report by Site for Region 3, September 26,1991

Order Number PB92-105261CDH, price: PC A16
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 26 Sep 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number, SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites, SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located. Region 3 includes Delaware,
District of Columbia*, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and
Wast Virginia.

Specifications: Supersedes PB91-215285 through PB91-
215335. See also PB92-105253. 357p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials, Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking
System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 3.

0841 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Report by Site for Region 4, September 26, 1991

Order Number PB92-105279CDH, price: PC A11
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 26 Sep 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located. Region 4 includes Alabama,
Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South
Carolina, and Tennessee.

Specifications: Supersedes PB91-215343 through PB91-
215426. See also PB92-105261. 248p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials, Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking
System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 4.

156

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0842 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Report by Site for Region 5, September 26,1991

Order Number PB92-105287CDH, price: Call for price
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 28 Sep 91
When expending Supertund monies at a GERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located. Region 5 includes Illinois, In-
diana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, and Wisconsin.
Specifications; Supersedes PB91-215434 through PB91-
215491. See also PB92-105279. 639p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials, Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking
System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 5,

0843 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS); PRP
Report by Site for Region 6, September 26, 1991

Order Number PB92-105295CDH, price: PC A12
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 26 Sep 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located. Region 6 includes Arkansas,
Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas.
Specifications: Supersedes PB91-215509 through PB91-
215558. See also PB92-105287. 270p.

Subject index keywords; Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials, Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking
System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 6.

0844 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Report by Site for Region 7, September 26,1991

Order Number PB92-105303CDH, price: PC A12
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 26 Sep 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located. Region 7 includes Iowa,
Kansas, Missouri, and Nebraska.

Specifications: Supersedes PB91-215566 through PB91-
215608. See also PB92-105295. 261 p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials, Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking
System, Potentially responsible parites, EPA region 7.

0845 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Report by Site for Region 8, September 26,1991

Order Number PB92-105311CDH, price: PC A06
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 26 Sep 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number.

Specifications: Supersedes PB91-215616 through PB91-
215673. See also PB92-105303. 112p,

Subject index keywords: Sites, Hazardous materials.

0846 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Report by Site for Region 9, September 26,1991

Order Number PB92-105329CDH, price: PC A12
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 26 Sep 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-

157

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PBP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located. Region 9 includes American
Samoa, Arizona, California, Guam, Hawaii, Midway, Nevada,
Northern Marianas, Pacific Islands*, Trust Territories, and
Wake Island.

Specifications: Supersedes PB91-215681 through PB91-
215749. See also PB92-105311, 269p.

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials, Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking
System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 9.

0847 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP
Report by Site for Region 10, September 26,1991

Order Number PB92-105337CDH, price: PC A09
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 26 Sep 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the
range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. The site report is designed to provide PRP information
linked by the associated site, which appears according to the
state where the site is located. Region 10 includes Alaska*,
Idaho, Oregon, and Washington.

Specifications: Supersedes PB91-215756 and PB91-
215772 through PB91-215798. See also PB92-105329. 180p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials, Directories, Site Enforcement Tracking
System, Potentially responsible parties, EPA region 10.

0848 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS): PRP Site
Listing by Site for Virginia

Order Number PB90-243023CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 2 Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP), Data from this notice tetter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created to track PRP identification at both NPL (National Pri-
ority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not address the

range of other administrative duties related to tracking the
PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent EPA's prelimi-
nary findings on the identities of potentially responsible par-
ties. Inclusion on these lists does not constitute a final deter-
mination concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or
contamination at any CERCLA site. The site report is de-
signed to provide PRP information linked by the associated
site, which appears according to Virginia where the site is lo-
cated.

Specifications: Also available in set of 5 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB90-242983. See also PB90-243015 and PB90-
243031. 24p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Virginia,
Waste disposal, Coordinated procurement, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Superfund, Remedial action.

0849 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region 1
• 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2 Compatible) (for
Microcomputers)

Order Number PB92-500131CDH, price: D01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Oct 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites, EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
dress the range of other .administrative duties related to
tracking the PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent
EPA's preliminary findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclu-
sion on these lists does not constitute a final determination
concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or con-
tamination at any CERCLA site. Region 1 includes Connecti-
cut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island,
and Vermont.

Specifications: The datafile is on one, 3 1/2 inch diskette,
1.44M high density. File format: ASCII. System: IBM PS/2;
MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K. Other formats avail-
able as IBM (or compatible) 5 1/4 inch - PB90-502618. 1 dis-
kette.

Subject index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Superfund, Remedial action. Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible par-
ties, EPA region 1.

0850 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region
1) (for Microcomputers)

Order Number PB90-502618CDH. price: DG1
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund

158

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites, SETS does not ad-
dress the range of other administrative duties related to
tracking the PRP. These lists represent EPA's preliminary
findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclusion on these lists
does not constitute a final determination concerning the li-
ability of any party for the hazard or contamination at any
CERCLA site. Region 1 includes Connecticut, Maine, Massa-
chusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont.
Specifications: The datafile is contained on two 1.2M, 5 1 /4
inch diskettes, high density. File format: ASCII, System: IBM
PC/AT; MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K. 2 diskettes.
Subject index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
Superfund, Remedial action, Region 1, Waste management.

0851 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region 2
- 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2 Compatible) (for
Microcomputers)

Order Number PB92-500149CDH, price: D01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Oct 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
dress the range of other administrative duties related to
tracking the PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent
EPA's preliminary findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclu-
sion on these lists does not constitute a final determination
concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or con-
tamination at any CERCLA site. Region 2 includes New
Jersey, New York, Puerto Rico, and Virgin Islands*. "There
are no sites in this territory at this time.

Subject index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Superfund, Remedial action, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible par-
ties, EPA region 2.

0852 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region
2) (for Microcomputers)

Order Number PB90-502626CDH, price: D01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
dress the range of other administrative duties related to
tracking the PRP. These lists represent EPA's preliminary
findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclusion on these lists
does not constitute a final determination concerning the li-
ability of any party for the hazard or contamination at any
CERCLA site. Region 2 includes New Jersey, New York,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands.

Specifications: The datafile is contained on one 1,2M, 5 1/4
inch diskette, high density. File format ASCII. System: IBM
PC/AT; MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K. 1 diskette.
Subject index keywords: Date file. Hazardous materials,
Superfund, Remedial action, Region 2, Waste management.

0853 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region 3
- 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2 Compatible) (for
Microcomputers)

Order Number PB92-500156CDH, price: D01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Oct 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
dress the range of other administrative duties related to
tracking the PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent
EPA's preliminary findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclu-
sion on these lists does not constitute a final determination
concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or con-
tamination at any CERCLA site. Region 3 includes Delaware,
District of Columbia*, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia and
West Virginia. 'There are no sites in this federal district at
this time.

Specifications: The datafile is on one, 3 1/2 inch diskette,
1.44M high density. File format: ASCII. System: IBM PS/2;
MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K. Other formats avail-

159

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

able as IBM {or compatible) 5 1/4 inch - PB90-502634. 1 dis-
kette.

Subject index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Superfund, Remedial action, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible par-
ties, EPA region 3.

0854 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region
3) (for Microcomputers)

Order Number PB90-502634CDH, price: D01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS),
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
dress the range of other administrative duties related to
tracking the PRP, These lists represent EPA's preliminary
findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclusion on these lists
does not constitute a final determination concerning the li-
ability of any party for the hazard or contamination at any
CERCLA site. Region 3 includes Delaware, District of Colum-
bia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West Virginia,
Specifications: The datafile is contained on one 1.2M, 5 1/4
inch diskette, high density. File format; ASCII. System: IBM
PC/AT; MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K. 1 diskette.
Subject index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
Superfund, Remedial action, Region 3, Waste management.

0855 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region 4
• 3 1/2 inch Diskette IBM PS/2 Compatible) (for
Microcomputers)

Order Number PB92-500164CDH, price: D01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Oct 91

When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
dress the range of other administrative duties related to
tracking the PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent
EPA's preliminary findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclu-
sion on these lists does not constitute a final determination
concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or con-
tamination at any CERCLA site. Region 4 includes Alabama,

Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South
Carolina, and Tennessee.

Subject index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Superfund, Remedial action, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible par-
ties, EPA region 4.

0856 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region
4) (for Microcomputers)

Order Number PB90-502642CDH, price: D01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
dress the range of other administrative duties related to
tracking the PRP. These lists represent EPA's preliminary
findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclusion on these lists
does not constitute a final determination concerning the li-
ability of any party for the hazard or contamination at any
CERCLA site. Region 4 includes Alabama, Florida, Georgia,
Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, and
Tennessee.

Specifications: The datafile is contained on one 1.2M, 5 1/4
inch diskette, high density. File format: ASCII. System: IBM
PC/AT; MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K, 1 diskette.
Subject index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
Superfund, Region 4, Remedial action, Waste management.

0857 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region 5
- 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2 Compatible) (for
Microcomputers)

Order Number PB92-500172CDH, price: D01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Oct 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-

160

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

dress the range of other administrative duties related to
tracking the PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent
EPA's preliminary findings on the identities ol PRPs. Inclu-
sion on these lists does not constitute a final determination
concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or con-
tamination at any CERCLA site. Region 5 includes Illinois, In-
diana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, and Wisconsin.
Specifications: The datafile is on one, 3 1/2 inch diskette,
1.44M high density. File format: ASCII. System: IBM PS/2;
MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K. Other formats avail-
able as IBM (or compatible) 5 1/4 inch - PB90-502659. 1 dis-
kette.

Subject index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Superfund, Remedial action, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible par-
ties, EPA region 5.

0858 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region
5) (for Microcomputers)

Order Number PB90-502659CDH, price; D01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice latter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
dress the range of other administrative duties related to
tracking the PRP. These lists represent EPA's preliminary
findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclusion on these lists
does not constitute a final determination concerning the li-
ability of any party for the hazard or contamination at any
CERCLA site. Region 5 includes Illinois, Indiana, Michigan,
Minnesota, Ohio, and Wisconsin.

Specifications: The datafile is contained on two 1.2M, 5 1/4
inch diskettes, high density. File format: ASCII, System: IBM
PC/AT; MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K. 2 diskettes.
Subject index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
Superfund, Region 5, Remedial action, Waste management.

0859 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region 6
- 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2 Compatible) (for
Microcomputers)

Order Number PB92-500180CDH, price: D01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Oct 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice tetter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related

CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
dress the range of other administrative duties related to
tracking the PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent
EPA's preliminary findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclu-
sion on these lists does not constitute a final determination
concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or con-
tamination at any CERCLA site. Region 6 includes Arkansas,
Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas.
Specifications: The datafile is on one, 3 1/2 inch diskette,
1.44M high density. File format: ASCII. System: IBM PS/2;
MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K, Other formats aval-
able as IBM (or compatible) 5 1 /4 inch - PB90-5G2667,1 dis-
kette.

Subject index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Superfund, Remedial action, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible par-
ties, EPA region 6.

0860 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region
6) {for Microcomputers)

Order Number PB90-502667CDH, price: D01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
dress the range of other administrative duties related to
tracking the PRP. These lists represent EPA's preliminary
findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclusion on these lists
does not constitute a final determination concerning the li-
ability of any party for the hazard or contamination at any
CERCLA site. Region 6 includes Arkansas, Louisiana, New
Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas.

Specifications: The datafile is contained on one 1.2M, 5 1/4
inch diskette, high density. File format: ASCII. System: IBM
PC/AT; MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K. 1 diskette.
Subject index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
Superfund, Remedial action, Waste management, Region 6.

0861 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region 7
- 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2 Compatible) (for
Microcomputers)

Order Number PB92-5Q0198CDH, price: D01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Oct 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-

161

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
dress the range of other administrative duties related to
tracking the PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent
EPA's preliminary findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclu-
sion on these lists does not constitute a final determination
concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or con-
tamination at any CERCLA site. Region 7 includes Iowa,
Kansas, Missouri, and Nebraska.

Subject index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Superfund, Remedial action, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible par-
ties, EPA region 7.

0862 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region
7) (for Microcomputers)

Order Number PB9G-5G2675CDH, price: D01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 31 Jul 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number, SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
dress the range of other administrative duties related to
tracking the PRP. These lists represent EPA's preliminary
findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclusion on these lists
does not constitute a final determination concerning the li-
ability of any party for the hazard or contamination at any
CERCLA site. Region 7 includes Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, and
Nebraska.

Specifications: The datafile is contained on one 1.2M, 5 11A
inch diskette, high density. File format: ASCII. System: IBM
PC/AT; MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K. 1 diskette.
Subject index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
Superfund, Remedial action, Waste management, Region 7,

0863 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region 8
- 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2 Compatible) (for
Microcomputers)

Order Number PB92-500206CDH, price: D01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Oct 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties

with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
dress the range of other administrative duties related to
tracking the PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent
EPA's preliminary findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclu-
sion on these lists does not constitute a final determination
concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or con-
tamination at any CERCLA site. Region 8 includes Colorado,
Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming.
Specifications; The datafile is on one, 3 1/2 inch diskette,
1.44M high density. File format: ASCII. System: IBM PS/2;
MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K. Other formats avail-
able as IBM (or compatible) 5 1 /4 inch - PB90-502683. 1 dis-
kette.

Subject index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Superfund, Remedial action, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible par-
ties, EPA region 8.

0884 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region
8) (for Microcomputers)

Order Number PB90-502683CDH, price: D01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 31 Jul 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter Is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
dress the range of other administrative duties related to
tracking the PRP. These lists represent EPA's preliminary
findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclusion on these lists
does not constitute a final determination concerning the li-
ability of any party for the hazard or contamination at any
CERCLA site. Region 8 includes Colorado, Montana, North
Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming.

Specifications: The datafile is contained on one 1,2M, 5 1 /4
inch diskette, high density. File format: ASCII. System: IBM
PC/AT; MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 840K. 1 diskette.
Subject Index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
Superfund, Region 8, Waste management, Remedial action.

162

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

0865 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region 9
- 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2 Compatible) (for
Microcomputers)

Order Number PB92-500214CDH, price: D01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Oct 91

When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP), Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the data the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number, SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
dress the range of other administrative duties related to
tracking the PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent
EPA's preliminary findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclu-
sion on these lists does not constitute a final determination
concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or con-
tamination at any CERCLA site. Region 9 includes American
Somoa, Arizona, California, Guam*, Hawaii*, Midway*,
Nevada, Northern Marianas, Pacific Islands*, Trust Territo-
ries, and Wake Island*. 'There are no sites in the state/terri-
tory at this time.

Subject index keywords; Data file, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Superfund, Remedial action, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible par-
ties, EPA region 9.

0866 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region
9) (for Microcomputers)

Order Number PB90-502691CDH, price: D01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Aug 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-
dress the range of other administrative duties related to
tracking the PRP. These lists represent EPA's preliminary
findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclusion on these lists
does not constitute a final determination concerning the li-
ability of any party for the hazard or contamination at any
CERCLA site. Region 9 includes American Somoa, Arizona,

California, Guam, Hawaii, Midway, Nevada, Northern Mari-
anas, Pacific Islands, Trust Territories, and Wake Island,
Specifications; The datafile is contained on one 1,2M, 5 1 /4
inch diskette, high density. File format: ASCII. System: IBM
PC/AT; MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K. 1 diskette.
Subject index keywords; Date file, Hazardous materials,
Superfund, Remedial action, Region 9, Waste management.

0867 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region
10 - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2 Compatible) (for
Microcomputers)

Order Number PB92-500222CDH, price: D01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Oct 91
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from the notice tetter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
The data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number. SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP Identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites, SETS does not ad-
dress the range of other administrative duties related to
tracking the PRP. These lists (updated quarterly) represent
EPA's preliminary findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclu-
sion on these lists does not constitute a final determination
concerning the liability of any party for the hazard or con-
tamination at any CERCLA site. Region 10 includes Alaska*,
Idaho, Oregon, and Washington, "There are no sites in this
state at this time.

Specifications: The datafile is on one, 3 1/2 inch diskette,
1.44M high density. File format: ASCII. System: IBM PS/2;
MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640 K. Other formats avail-
able as IBM (or compatible) 5 1/4 inch - PB90-502709. 1 dis-
kette.

Subject index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Superfund, Remedial action, Directories, Site
Enforcement Tracking System, Potentially responsible par-
ties, EPA region 10.

0868 Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS) (Region
10) (for Microcomputers)

Order Number PB90-502709CDH, price: D01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 31 Jul 90
When expending Superfund monies at a CERCLA (Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) site, EPA must conduct a search to identify parties
with potential financial responsibility for remediation of un-
controlled hazardous waste sites. EPA regional Superfund
Waste Management Staff issue a notice letter to the poten-
tially responsible party (PRP). Data from this notice letter is
used to form the Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS).
This data includes PRP name and address, a company con-
tact person, the date the notice was issued, and the related
CERCLA site name and identification number, SETS was
created by EPA to track PRP identification at both NPL (Na-
tional Priority List) and non-NPL sites. SETS does not ad-

163

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

dress the range of other administrative duties related to
tracking the PRP. These lists represent EPA's preliminary
findings on the identities of PRPs. Inclusion on these lists
does not constitute a final determination concerning the li-
ability of any party for the hazard or contamination at any
CERCLA site. Region 10 includes Alaska, Idaho, Oregon,
arid Washington.

Specifications: The datafile is contained on one 1.2M, 5 1/4
inch diskette, high density. File format: ASCII. System: IBM
PC/AT; MS DOS 3.3 operating system, 640K. 1 diskette.
Subject index keywords; Data file, Hazardous materials,
Superfund, Waste management, Region 10, Remedial action.

0869 Small Cost Recovery Referrals

Order Number PB91-139006CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 12 Jul 85
The directive clarifies EPA policy on referring CERCLA cost
recovery cases valued at less than $200,000. There are two
memoranda attached, the first of which is entitled 'Prepara-
tion of Hazardous Waste Referrals,' dated July 30,1985. The
memorandum provides guidance on preparing referral pack-
ages meeting Department of Justice requirements. The
second memorandum, entitled 'Small Cost Recovery Refer-
rals,' dated July 12, 1985, states that although the Agency
places high priority on larger cases, there are situations in
which cost recovery of small cases is appropriate.
Specifications; 10p.

Subject index keywords; Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0870 Streamlined Approach for Settlements with De
Minimis Waste Contributors under CERCLA Section
122(g)(1)(A)

Order Number PB93-963617CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 30 Jul 93
The guidance sets forth the Agency's new approach to com-
pleting de minimis settlements. The memorandum expands
upon the information provided in the 'Superfund Administra-
tive Improvements - Final Report (June 23, 1993)'. Under
Section 122(g) of CERCLA the Agency may settle with per-
sons who contributed to a facility hazardous substances
which are minima!, both in terms of volume and toxicity or
other hazardous effects, relative to other hazardous sub-
stances at a site. De minimis settlements may only address a
minor amount of response costs at a site.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $450). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB92-963607. 10p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Liabilities.

0871 Submittal of Ten-Point Settlement Analyses for
CERCLA Consent Decrees

Order Number P391-139485CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 11 Aug 89
The directive memorandum provides guidance to help ensure
the adequacy of information provided in the 'ten-point" analy-
ses of proposed CERCLA settlements.

Specifications: Portions of this document are not fully legi-
ble. 33p.

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0872 Summary of 'Guidance of Landowner Liability under
Section 107(a)1 of CERCLA, De Minimis Settlements
under Section 122(g)(1)(b) of CERCLA, and Settlements
with Prospective Purchasers of Contaminated Property'

Order Number PB91-228288CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; May 91
The Fact Sheet summarizes when landowners may be eligi-
ble for a release from liability and when a landowner may be
eligible for a de minimis settlement. It also describes the
agency's policy on prospective purchasers of contaminated
property.

Specifications: 4p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0873 Summary of 'Guidance on CERCLA Section 106(a)
UAOs for RD/RA'

Order Number PB91-228312CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; May 91
The Fact Sheet summarizes the procedures for issuing uni-
lateral orders and includes statutory requirements of section
106 orders, possible recipients of orders, case-specific con-
siderations, procedures for issuing unilateral orders, and
what to do in the case of non-compliance with an order.

Specifications: 4p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0874 Summary of 'Guidance on Documenting Decisions
Not to Take Cost Recovery Actions'

Order Number PB91-228338CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; May 91
The Fact Sheet summarizes procedures for documenting a
decision not to pursue cost recovery actions.

Specifications: 3p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0875 Summary of 'Interim Guidance: Streamlining the
CERCLA Settlement Decision Process'

Order Number PB91-228270CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; May 91
The Fact Sheet summarizes the three areas in which
changes will help improve and streamline the process for
conducting settlement discussions. The three areas are ne-
gotiation preparation, review of settlement decisions, and
deadline management
Specifications: 4p.

164

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Enforcement

Subject index keywords; Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response,

0876 Summary of 'Interim Guidelines for Preparing
NBARs'

Order Number PB91-228304CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01

Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of

Solid Waste and Emergency Response; May 91

The Fact Sheet summarizes the procedures for preparing

NBARs, including when to use NBARs, how to prepare them,

and offers bases on NBARs.

Specifications: 4p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0877 Summary of 'Interim Policy on CERCLA Settlements
Involving Municipalities and Municipal Wastes'

Order Number PB91-228262CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; May 91

The Fact Sheet addresses a consistent agency-wide ap-
proach for addressing municipalities and municipal wastes in
the Superfund settlement process. The policy also addresses
settlements with private generators and transporters of haz-
ardous waste trash derived from a commercial, institutional,
or industrial process or activity.

Specifications: 4p.

Subject Index keywords; Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0878 Summary of 'Methodologies for Implementation of
CERCLA Section 122(g)(1)(a) De Minimis Waste
Contributor Settlements'

Order Number PB91-227959CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; May 91
The Fact Sheet summarizes the basic steps in forming set-
tlements with PRPs at a site who are minimal contributors to
the waste in comparison with other PRPs. It lists the criteria
for eligibility, communication procedures, timing costs, premi-
ums, reopeners, and settlement options.

Specifications: 4p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0879 Summary of 'PRP Search Supplemental Guidance
for Sites In the Superfund Remedial Program'

Order Number PB91-228320CDH, price; PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 91
The Fact Sheet summarizes the steps involved in a thorough
PRP Search, including determination of liability, PRP Search
Planning, the PRP Search Process and compiling PRP
Search Reports.

Specifications: 4p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0880 Summary of 'Releasing Information to Potentially
Responsible Parties at CERCLA Sites'

Order Number PB91-228298CDH, price: PC A01 /MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; May 91
The Fact Sheet summarizes EPA's policy on releasing infor-
mation to PRP's.

Specifications; 3 p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0881 Superfund and Small Waste Contributors

Order Number PB94-963610CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Aug 93
When Congress enacted Superfund, it intended to make the
polluters pay for the costs of cleaning up these sites. To
achieve this goal, EPA seeks to hold those parties who con-
tributed to the contamination responsible for the cost of
cleanup. Such parties may be asked to help pay for the
cleanup of a site even if they acted in full accordance with
the law at the time they disposed of the waste. Superfund
encourages EPA to settle with these responsible parties out-
side of court, but also authorizes the Agency to bring actions
in court to require responsible parties to pay for (or perform)
the cleanup.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Cleanup, Superfund, Potentially responsible parties.

0882 Superfund Cost Recovery Strategy

Order Number PB91-139063CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 29 Jul 88
The Superfund cost recovery strategy provides a framework
for planning and initiating actions to recover Federal funds
expended in CERCLA response actions. The directive dis-
cusses general cost recovery program priorities and provides
guidelines for setting case priorities for the most efficient use
of cost recovery resources.

Specifications: 55p.

Subject index keywords; Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0883 Superfund Enforcement Strategy and
Implementation Plan

Order Number PB91-138842CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 12 Apr 90
The directive reflects a review of recent studies of the Super-
fund program, as well as on going management initiatives in-
volving EPA and the Department of Justice, including the Su-
perfund Settlement Incentives and Disincentives Workgroup
and the Superfund Enforcement Management Issues Work-
group. A list of issues raised in various studies and reports is
included as Appendix B,

Specifications: 67p.

165

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION; Enforcement

Subject index keywords: Supcrfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0884 Superfund Information Repositories and
Administrative Records

Order Number PB92-963622CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; Aug 92
The fact sheet discusses two features of EPA's Superfund
Community Relations Program: the information repository
and the administrative record. The fact sheet describes the
types of information usually contained in the information re-
pository and administrative record and describes how the
public can access that information.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico: all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 9p.

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0885 Supplemental Guidance on Federal Superfund Liens

Order Number PB93-963618CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 29 Jul 93
The purpose of the guidance document is to supplement the
'Guidance on Federal Superfund Liens' (PB91-139055)
issued on September 22, 1987. The Supplement is in addi-
tion to, and does not supersede the 1987 document, which
provided criteria for the decision to file liens under Section
107 (1) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA). The Sup-
plement outlines procedures for Regional staff to follow to
provide notice and opportunity to be heard to potentially re-
sponsible parties on whose property liens are to be perfect-
ed.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $450). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB91-139303. 17p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Liens.

0886 Timely Initiation of Responsible Party Searches,
Issuance of Notice Letters, and Release of Information
(Attachment XXII)

Order Number PB92-102Q60CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 18 Sep 91
The directive re-emphasizes the importance of early identifi-
cation of potentially responsible parties (PRPs) and timely is-
suance of notice letters for the RI/FS. These actions support
the Agency's policy to secure cleanup by responsible parties
in lieu of Superfund use, where such cleanup can be accom-
plished in a timely and effective manner. The sooner PRPs
are identified and notified about their potential responsibility,
the more time they have to organize themselves to assure
responsibility for the RI/FS and cleanup. It also clarifies
Agency policy on release of site-specific information to PRPs
and others, it supplements the information release section of
the interim CERCLA Settlement Policy (December 5, 1984).
The clarification is designed to facilitate information ex-

change in order to encourage effective negotiation and coa-
lescing by PRPs among themselves. Effective PRP negotia-
tions and coalescing are likely to engender effective settle-
ment discussions with the government.

Specifications: 7p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste man-
agement, Superfund, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0887 Transmittal of Guidance on Use and Enforcement of
CERCLA Information Requests and Administrative
Subpoenas

Order Number PB91-139170CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 25 Aug 88
The directive provides an overview of the information gather-
ing tools under CERCLA section 104(e) and 122(e)(3), and
focuses on the steps to be taken throughout the information
gathering process to ensure that EPA is in the strongest po-
sition possible to enforce the information gathering or sub-
poena. The guidance replaces existing guidance entitled,
'Policy on Enforcing Information Requests in Hazardous
Waste Cases,' dated September 10, 1984, to the extent that
the previous guidance addresses information gathering under
CERCLA section 104(e), directive no. 9834.4.

Specifications: 52p.

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0888 Transmittal of Model Consent Decree for CERCLA
Section 104(e) Information Request Enforcement Actions

Order Number PB91-193417CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1991
The directive is a guidance document - Mode) Consent
Decree developed to further support the CERCLA 104(e) Ini-
tiative,

Specifications: 17p,

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Consent orders.

0889 Transmittal of the Final Waste Oil Interim
Enforcement Guidance Document

Order Number PB91-140202CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 30 Dec 86
The Office of Solid Waste and Emergency response has de-
veloped the Waste Oil Interim Enforcement Guidance Docu-
ment. The purpose of the document is to provide information
to the Regions about the technology of the waste oil industry
as well as strategies for enforcement. Waste oil is a very
complex environmental issue owing in large part to the diffi-
culty of tracing waste derived fuels through a complex
system of waste oil dealers. The guidance was developed to
assist those enforcing the waste oil regulations to better un-
derstand the important issues. It is interim guidance because
the regulations for used oil management have not been com-
pleted. As the regulations become complete or changes in
policy or technology occur, the document will be amended
accordingly.

Specifications: 66p.

166

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Federal Facilities

Subject index keywords: Supcrfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response,

0890 United States Environmental Protection Agency
Model CERCLA RD/RA Consent Decree

Order Number PB91-201673CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1991
The directive is a Guidance Document - Model Consent
Decree (CERCLA RD/RA) to further support Sections 106
and 107 of CERCLA.

Specifications: 82p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response,

0891 Use of CERCLA Section 106 Unilateral Enforcement
for Remedial Design and Remedial Action: Strategy for
Fiscal Year 1990

Order Number PB91-139733CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 14 Feb 90
The directive describes FY90 strategy for enhancing use of
CERCLA section 106 authorities, focusing significantly on
Unilateral Administrative Orders (UAOs) for remedial designs
and remedial actions (RD/RA). The directive supersedes di-
rective no. 9870.1 'CERCLA Section 106 Unilateral RD/RA
Enforcement: Accomplishments through 2nd Quarter and
Strategy for the Remainder of FY 1989,' dated July 11, 1989.
Specifications; 11 p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0892 Waiver of Concurrence on De Minimis Generator
Settlements

Order Number PB91-138826CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 15 Jul 88
The directive authorizes Region I at Type Level 2 of the re-
vised CERCLA civil judicial settlement authorities under Dele-
gation 14-13-B and 14-14-E, providing the Region with dele-
gated authority to transmit de minimis settlements under sec-
tion 122(g)(1)(A) to the Department of Justice with Head-
quarters consultation. The directive supplements a portion of
directive No. 9012.10-a 'Revision of CERCLA Judicial Settle-
ment Authorities Under Delegations 14-13-B and 14-14-E,'
dated June 17, 1988.

Specifications: 5p.

Subject index keywords: Refuse disposal, Penalties, Office
of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Comprehensive
Environment Response Compensation and Liability Act, Gen-
erator settlements.

0893 Waiver of Headquarters Approval for Issuance of
RD/RA Special Notice Letters at the Time of ROD
Signature from OERR and OWPE

Order Number PB91-139261CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 26 Sep 88
The report informs the Regions that it will no longer be nec-
essary to obtain prior written approval from Headquarters to
issue special notice letters at record of decision signature.

Specifications: 6p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous wastes, Waste treat-
ment, Law enforcement, Superfund, Record of Decision.

0894 Written Demand for CERCLA Cost Recovery

Order Number PB91-204628CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 21 Mar 91
The directive provides updated guidance on the use and is-
suance of written demands. Written demands are used to
formalize the demand for payment of incurred costs plus
future expenditures, to inform potential defendants of the
dollar amount of those costs, and to establish that interest
begins to accrue on expenditures. The guidance helps
assure that the written demand is made early to maximize re-
covery. The directive supplements directive 9832.1 'Cost Re-
covery Actions Under the Comprehensive Environmental Re-
sponse, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA)',
dated August 26, 1983.

Specifications: 33p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0895 Written Demand for Recovery of Costs Incurred
Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA)

Order Number PB91-228742CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 26 Mar 91
The directive was written to formalize the demand for pay-
ment of costs; to inform potential determines of the dollar
amount of these costs; and to establish that interest begins
to accrue.

Specifications: 31 p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:

Federal Facilities

0896 Compendium of Federal Faciilties Directives, 1984
and 1985

Order Number PB91-921280CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 91
The compendium is a collection of Federal Facilities direc-
tives issued in 1984 and 1985. The contents includes: Feder-
al Facilities (9272.0-04); Implementation of CERCLA Strategy
at Federal Facilities (9272.0-01); Initial Guidance on Federal
Facilities CERCLA Sites (9272.0-02); Responsibilities for
Federal Facilities (9272.0-03); and Responsibilities for Feder-
al Facilities (9272.0-05).

Subject index keywords: Federal government, Facilities,
Superfund.

167

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Field Health & Safety

0897 Future Land Use Scenarios for Federal Facilities

Order Number PB92-182427CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Seattle, WA. Region X; Jul
92

The paper provides background information for predicting (1)
the time required to transfer a Federal property to new own-
ership, and (2) the likely future of a Federal property after
transfer. Making these predictions is a necessary part of the
baseline risk assessment which must be performed on each
Superfund site in compliance with Federal regulations. Key
issues that are unresolved by current guidance are also dis-
cussed, including the parceling of Superfund properties, the
wauranty of cleanup operations, liability, the use of institu-
tional controls, and occupant protection. The paper empha-
sizes that transfer times and future uses are highly depend-
ent upon the politics of the specific site, the oversight
agency, and the local community. Some suggestions for site
specific surveys are presented.

Specifications: 61 p.

Subject Index keywords: Land management, Military facili-
ties, Land ownership, Risk assessment, Land pollution,

0898 Guidance for Federal Facilities on Release
Notification Requirements under CERCLA and SARA
Title III

Order Number PB93-963412CDH, price; PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Nov 90
The document is intended as guidance for federal facilities to
better understand CERCLA and SARA Title II release notifi-
cation requirements.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Pollution regulations,
Federal facilities.

0899 Military Base Closures: Guidance on EPA
Concurrence in the Identification of Uncontaminated
Parcels under CERCLA Section 120(h)(4)

Order Number PB94-963249CDH, price: Standing Order, call
for price

Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 19 Apr 94
The memorandum is intended to provided guidance concern-
ing the implementation of CERCLA section 120(h)(4). Specifi-
cally, it addresses the approach EPA should use in determin-
ing whether to concur that a parcel has been properly identi-
fied by the military service as "uncontaminated' and therefore
transferrable pursuant to CERCLA 120(h)(4).

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required ($100 U.S., Canada, and Mexico; all
others $200). Single copies also available in paper copy or
microfiche. 4p.

Subject index keywords: Military base closings, Hazardous
materials, Land pollution detection.

0900 Regional Oversight of Federal Facility Clean-ups
under CERCLA

Order Number PB91-138875CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 25 Nov 85
The directive reemphasizes the Importance of oversight of
Federal facilities. The memorandum outlines Regional roles
and responsibilities for Federal facilities oversight, and refers
to the draft 'Federal Facilities Program Manual for Implemen-
tation of CERCLA Responsibilities of Federal Agencies.'
Specifications: 9p.

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Field
Health & Safety

0901 Compendium of ERT Air Sampling Procedures

Order Number PB92-963406CDH, price; PC A07/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 92
The directive provides guidelines for ERT air sampling proce-
dures, including SUMMA Canister Cleaning, SUMMA Canister
Sampling, GC/MS Analysis of Tenax/CMS Cartridges and
SUMMA Canisters, Preparation of SUMMA Canister Field
Standards, Low Level Methane Analysis for SUMMA Canister
Gas Samples, Asbestos Sampling, Tedlar Bag Sampling,
Charcoal Tube Sampling, Tenax Tub Sampling, and Polyure-
thane Foam Sampling.

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Air pollution sampling, SUMMA canis-
ters, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

0902 Compendium of ERT Field Analytical Procedures

Order Number PB92-963405CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 92
The directive provides standard operating procedures for
field analytical procedures, including the use of Sentex Scen-
tograph Gas Chromatograph; Portable XRF Analyzer; Pho-
toionization Detector -- HNU; Photovac 10A10 Portable Gas
Chromatograph Operation; Photovac 10S50, 10S55, and
10S70 Gas Chromatograph Operation; Photovac GC Analysis
for Air, Soil Gas, Water, and Soil; and Micromonitor M200.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 84p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Air pollution detection, Gas analysis,
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

168

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Field Health &

Safety

0903 Compendium of ERT Groundwater Sampling
Procedures

Order Number PB91-921275CDH, price; PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 91
The Compendium of Groundwater Sampling Procedures de-
scribes methods used for preventing or reducing cross-con-
tamination, and provides general guidelines for sampling
equipment decontamination procedures at a hazardous
waste site. Preventing or minimizing cross-contamination in
sampled media and in samples is important for preventing
the introduction of error into sampling results and for protect-
ing the health and safety of site personnel.

Subject index keywords: Ground water, Hazardous materi-
als, Waste disposal, Superfund.

0904 Compendium of ERT Soil Sampling and Surface
Geophysics Procedures

Order Number PB91-921273CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 91
The compendium of soil sampling and surface geophysics
procedures describes methods used for preventing or reduc-
ing cross-contamination, and provides general guidelines for
sampling equipment decontamination procedures at hazard-
ous waste site. Preventing or minimizing cross-contamination
in sampled media and in samples is important lor preventing
the introduction of eror into sampling results and for protect-
ing the health and safety of site personnel.

Subject index keywords: Sampling, Soils, Hazardous mate-
rials, Superfund.

0905 Compendium of ERT Surface Water and Sediment
Sampling Procedures

Order Number PB91-921274CDH, price; PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 91
The Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) describes methods
used for preventing or reducing cross-contamination, and
provides general guidelines for sampling equipment decon-
tamination procedures at a hazardous waste site. Preventing
or minimizing cross-contamination in sampled media and in
samples is important for preventing the introduction of error
into sampling results and for protecting the health and safety
of site personnel.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Surface
waters, Sediments, Superfund.

0906 Compendium of ERT Toxicity Testing Procedures

Order Number PB91-921271CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 91
The compendium documents the procedure for conducting a
standard reference toxicity test using sodium pentachloro-
phenate (NaPCP) as the toxicant and larval Pimephales pro-
melas (fathead minnows) as the test organism. The test esti-
mates the fitness, condition, and sensitivity of the organisms
used in a definitive toxicity test. It allows for inter- and intrala-
boratory comparisons of toxicity information and provides an
experimental control.

Subject index keywords: Tests, Hazardous materials, Tox-
icity, Superfund.

0907 Compendium of ERT Waste Sampling Procedures

Order Number PB91-921276CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 91
The compendium of waste sampling procedures describes
methods used for preventing or reducing cross-contamina-
tion, and provides general guidelines for sampling equipment
decontamination procedures at a hazardous waste site. Pre-
venting or minimizing cross-contamination in sampled media
and in samples is important for preventing the introduction of
error into sampling results and for protecting the health and
safety of site personnel.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund.

0908 Establishing Work Zones at Uncontrolled Hazardous
Waste Sites

Order Number PB91-921342CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 91
The purpose of the Fact Sheet is to summarize the proce-
dures and requirements for establishing and maintaining
work zones, including Support Zones at hazardous waste
sites.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Occupational safety and health, Office
of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

0909 Field Certification Tracking System (FCTS). User's
Guide. Version 2.1

Order Number PB93-963415CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 93
The document provides step by step guidelines for installing
the Field Certification Tracking System (FCTS), Version 2.1.

169

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION; Field Health & Safety

Hardware needs are described as well as where to call for
help.

Subject index keywords: Installation manuals, Superfund,
FCTS(Field Certification Tracking System).

0910 Field Standard Operating Procedures for Air
Surveillance F.S.O.P. No. 8

Order Number PB91-213843CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 1 Jan 85
The directive describes air monitoring procedures for use by
field personnel in obtaining air monitoring data required to
minimize the risk of exposure to personnel at hazardous sub-
stance release sites.

Specifications: 27p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Occupational safety and health, Air pol-
lution monitoring, Risk assessment, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response.

0911 Field Standard Operating Procedures for
Establishing Work Zones (F.S.O.P. 6)

Order Number PB91-213827CDH, price; PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1 Apr 85
The directive describes procedures to be used by field per-
sonnel in establishing work zones for control of hazardous
materials to minimize the risk of exposure to workers at haz-
ardous release sites.

Specifications: 23 p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Risk assessment, Occupational safety
and health, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

0912 Field Standard Operating Procedures for
Preparation of a Site Safety Plan F.S.O.P. No. 9

Order Number PB91-213835CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1 Apr 85
The directive establishes requirements for protecting health
and safety of field personnel during all activities conducted at
the site of an incident. The manual contains safety informa-
tion, instructions, and procedures to cover a variety of situa-
tions commonly encountered in this type of field work.
Specifications: 30p.

Subject index keywords: Occupational safety and health,
Superfund, Waste management, Hazardous materials, Risk
assessment, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Re-
sponse.

0913 Field Standard Operating Procedures for the
Decontamination of Response Personnel F.S.O.P. No. 7

Order Number PB91-213850CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 1 Jan 85
The directive describes approved operating procedures for
decontamination of response personnel and equipment at
hazardous substance release sites.

Specifications: 33p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Decontamination, Occupational safety
and health, Equipment, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0914 Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency
Response: RCRA TSD and Emergency Response Without
Regard to Location

Order Number PB91-921340CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 91
The purpose of the Fact Sheet is to explain the principle re-
quirements of the EPA and OSHA worker protection stand-
ards as they apply to employees who perform emergency re-
sponse operations irrespective of location and employees
who perform hazardous waste operations at RCRA TSD fa-
cilities.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Occupational safety and health, Office
of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

0915 Hazmat Team Planning Guidance

Order Number PB90-274523CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
The manual will assist local fire departments in identifying,
acquiring, and maintaining the hazardous materials response
equipment and trained personnel appropriate for their locale.
The manual offers guidance in the following areas: Determin-
ing actual hazmat response requirements; Establishing the
goals and levels of expertise needed to meet those require-
ments; Estimating the costs and developing a budget to
meet your goals; and Preparing response plans and standard
operating procedures (SOPs) to include the entire local re-
sponse community.

Specifications: 60p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Directories,
Fire departments.

0916 Health and Safety Audit Guidelines: SARA Title I,
Section 126

Order Number PB90-204157CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 89
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Audit Guidelines
provide step-by-step guidance for assessing preliminary eval-
uations, health and safety plans (HASPs), and off-site emer-
gency response programs required under the Occupational
Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and EPA worker
protection standards. Employees affected by the EPA stand-
ards will primarily be those State and local government em-
ployees engaged in hazardous waste operations at hazard-
ous waste sites and State and local off-site emergency re-
sponse personnel. The Guidelines address two major com-
ponents of the OSHA/EPA worker protection standards:
health and safety provisions at uncontrolled hazardous waste
sites and off-site emergency response.

Specifications: lQ9p.

170

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Field Health &

Safety

Subject index keywords: Auditing, Safety, Environmental
surveys, Occupational safety and health, Toxic substances,
Emergency preparedness.

0917 Health and Safety Plan (HASP) User's Guide
(Version 3.0/4.0)

Order Number PB93-963414CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 93
HASP (Health and Safety Planner) Version 3.0/4.0 is a soft-
ware program that generates a site-specific safety plan using
an automated decision-making process. HASP recommends
the required levels of protection (such as respirators arid per-
sonal protective equipment) based on the tasks being per-
formed and the chemicals that will be encountered. HASP in-
cludes standard protocols for 'typical' waste remediation and
assessment activities, and the health and safety plan format
is consistent with OSHA's 29 CFR 1910.120 and U.S. EPA's
40 CFR 311 requirements. The HASP is a mobile, field-
usable instrument, containing a database of information on
110 commonly occurring chemicals. The chemical database
used in developing the HASP also contains information on
an additional 2,500 chemicals.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; ail others $400), Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 29p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Occupational safety
and health, Remediation.

0918 Health and Safety Roles and Responsibilities at
Remedial Sites

Order Number PB91-921362CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 91
The purpose of the fact sheet is to define the major compo-
nents of the health and safety program and to delineate the
health and safety roles and responsibilities for Remedial
Project Managers (RPMs), lead parties/agencies, and con-
tractors during the remedial action phase of Superfund
cleanups. It addresses the various roles of all parties in the
overall health and safety program for a site, with emphasis
on Occupational Safety and Health Act/Agency (OSHA)
compliance.

Subject index keywords: Safety, Public health, Hazardous
materials, Superfund.

0919 Importance of Quality for Collection of
Environmental Samples. Planning, Implementing, and
Assessing Field Sampling Quality at CiRCLA Sites

Order Number PB91-218941CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Quality
Assurance Management Staff; 26 Jun 91
The most neglected aspects of environmental data collection
operations have been in the areas of sampling design and
sample collection. For years, most major environmental data
QA/QC efforts have focused on the laboratory operations,
with either the tacit assumption that sampling activities had
been properly designed and implemented, or with very little
attention given at all to the quality of field or sampling oper-

ations. Infrequent data quality analyses did result in the rec-
ognition that major error sources were undoubtedly associat-
ed with the sampling components of environmental data col-
lection. However, little was generally done to address or
remedy these recognized data quality shortfalls. The paper
will illustrate the importance of adequate planning, implemen-
tation, and assessment of field sampling work in the context
of the Environmental Protection Agency's Superfund pro-
gram.

Specifications: 12p.

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Sampling, Site sur-
veys, Waste disposal, Management planning.

0920 OSWER Integrated Health and Safety Policy

Order Number PB90-258344CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 16 Aug 88
The policy articulates the requirement for all EPA employees
to comply with Occupational Health and Safety Administra-
tion (OSHA) as well as EPA Health and Safety Directives.
The 27-page manual outlines the conditions of this policy
and the roles and responsibilities of EPA employees in meet-
ing them. The policy applies to all Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response (OSWER) employees engaged in haz-
ardous substances response activities.

Specifications: 35p.

Subject index keywords.- Regulations, Project management,
Occupational safety and health, Superfund, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, Environmental Protection
Agency.

0921 OSWER Integrated Health and Safety Standard
Operating Practices

Order Number PB93-963401CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Feb 93
The directive implements the OSWER (Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response) Integrated Health and Safety
Standards Operating Practices in conjunction with the OSHA
(Occupational Safety and Health Act) Worker Protection
Standards, replacing the OSWER Integrated Health and
Safety Policy.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Occupational safety and health, Office
of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

0922 Personal Air Sampling and Air Monitoring
Requirements under 29 CFR 1910.120

Order Number PB93-963420CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Aug 93
The Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergency Response
(HAZWOPER) provides a general overview of the worker
protection standards as they apply to operations conducted
at uncontrolled hazardous waste sites. The purpose of the
Fact Sheet is to summarize the HAZWOPER air monitoring
and sampling aspects of these requirements. The Fact Sheet
is composed of five parts: (1) Introduction to Air Monitoring
and Air Sampling; (2) Air Monitoring Requirements Upon Ini-

171

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION; Oil Spill & Spill
Management

tial Entry; (3) Air Monitoring Requirements After Initial Entry;
(4) Conducting Air Monitoring and Sampling; and (5) Informa-
tion Sources and Contacts.

Specifications*. Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $450). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 16p.

Subject index keywords: Air pollution monitors, Hazardous
materials, Occupational exposure.

0923 Priority for Health and Safety Requirements,
Especially Medical Surveillance Requirements, for EPA
Employees Who Support OSWER Programs

Order Number PB91-921346CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 1 Mar 90
The directive reminds employees that EPA must comply with
OSHA's hazardous waste and emergency response worker
protection rule (29 CFR 1910.120), EPA health and safety
policies contained in EPA 1440 Directives, and OSWER Di-
rective 9285.8-02, 'U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Health and Safety Audit Manual.' The directive gives some
specific details regarding medical surveillance, sometimes
called medical monitoring requirements.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Occupational safety and health, Office
of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

0924 Standard Operating Safety Guides

Order Number PB90-24959QCDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 88

The report includes the Occupational Safety and Health Ad-
ministration (OSHA) regulations as they might apply to haz-
ardous waste workers involved in Incident response. The edi-
tion updates the November 1984 edition of Standard Operat-
ing Safety Guides.

Specifications: 137p.

Subject index keywords: Workers, Hazardous materials,
Safety, Superfund, Occupational Safety and Health Adminis-
tration.

0925 Standard Operating Safety Guides

Order Number PB92-963414CDH, price; PC A09/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jun 92
The guides provide information on health and safety and are
to complement professional judgment and experience, and to
supplement existing Regional Office safety procedures. The
document provides guidance for ensuring health and safety
of site personnel who work with hazardous substances or
who work at uncontrolled hazardous waste sites. The guid-
ance is intended for federal, state, and local managers and
personnel at sites where hazardous materials are present.
The SOSG is intended to provide a comprehensive overview
of the information needed by employers to meet their re-
sponsibility to assure the health and safety of employees en-
gaged in operations at hazardous waste sites.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Safety, Pol-
lution control, Public health, Superfund.

PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Oil
Spill & Spill Management

0926 CERCLA Notifications: Emergency Response
Notification System (ERNS) Fact Sheet

Order Number PB92-963411CDH, price; PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 92
The Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) pro-
vides a mechanism for documenting and verifying release
notification information as initially reported to the National
Response Center (NRC), the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), and, to a limited extent, to the U.S. Coast
Guard (USCG) for response decisions. The initial notification
data may be followed up by various Federal, State and local
response authorities, as appropriate. ERNS contains data
that can be used to analyze release notificat'ons and spills,
support emergency planning efforts, and assist decision
makers in developing spill prevention programs. The fact
sheet provides summary information on notifications of re-
leases of hazardous substances regulated under the Com-
prehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Li-
ability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), as amended.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Wastes and Emergency
Response, Emergency Response Notification System.

0927 Emergency Response Notification System

Order Number PB90-249715CDH, price: PC A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 89
The pamphlet provides general information for the public de-
scribing the Emergency Response Notification System, the
national computer database and retrieval system that is used
to store information on releases of oil and hazardous sub-
stances.

Specifications: 7p.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Environmen-
tal surveys, Superfund, Emergency Response Notification
System, ERNS system, Oil spills, Waste management, Data
bases.

172

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Oil Spill & Spill

Management

0928 Exxon Valdez Oil Spill. A Report to the President

Order Number PB91-213819CDH, price; PC A04/MF A01

Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of

Emergency and Remedial Response,; Department of

Transportation, Washington, DC. Office of the

Secretary. * * National Response Team, Washington, DC; May

Prepared by the National Response Team, the report was re-
quested by the President and undertaken by Secretary of
Transportation Samuel K. Skinner and Environmental Protec-
tion Agency Administrator William K, Reilly. The report ad-
dresses the preparedness for, the response to, and early les-
sons learned from the Exxon Valdez incident. The President
has also asked Secretary Skinner to coordinate the efforts of
all federal agencies involved in the cleanup and Administra-
tor Reilly to coordinate the long-term recovery of the affected
areas of the Alaskan environment. The efforts are ongoing.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Department of
Transportation, Washington, DC. Office of the Secretary, and
National Response Team, Washington, DC. 75p.

Subject index keywords: Oil spills, Water pollution effects,
Prince William Sound, Oil pollution, Exxon Valdez, Cleanup
operations.

0929 Facility Response Plans

Order Number PB93-963408CDH, price: PC A01 /MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Feb 93
The fact sheet provides general information on EPA's intend-
ed implementation of the Clean Water Act Section 311 re-
quirements regarding facility response plans.

Subject index keywords: Oil spills, Regulations, Facilities
management, Oil Pollution Act, Facility Response Plan.

0930 Oil Notifications: Emergency Response Notification
System (ERNS) Fact Sheet

Order Number PB92-963413CDH, price; PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 92
The Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) is a
national computer database which provides the only central-
ized mechanism for documenting and verifying incident notifi-
cation information as initially reported to the National Re-
sponse Center (NRC), the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), and to a limited extent, the U.S. Coast Guard
(USCG). The initial notification data may be followed up with
updated information from various Federal, State and local re-
sponse authorities, as appropriate. ERNS contains data that
can be used to analyze release notifications, support emer-
gency planning efforts, and assist decision makers in devel-
oping spill prevention programs. The fact sheet provides
summary information on notifications of releases of oil re-
ported in accordance with the Clean Water Act (CWA).
Under Section 311 of the CWA, discharges of oil which: (1)
cause a sheen to appear on the surface of the water; (2) vio-
late applicable water quality standards; or (3) cause sludge
or emulsion to be deposited beneath the surface of the
water or adjoining shoreline, must be reported to the NRC.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Oil spills, Water pollu-
tion, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Emer-
gency Response Notification System.

0931 Oil Spill Contingency Planning: National Status. A
Report to the President

Order Number PB91-921282CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 90
In response to the Exxon Valdez oil disaster, President Bush
directed the National Response Team (NRT) to take a fresh
look at America's readiness to respond to oil spills of nation-
al significance in the countries' major ports and inland water-
ways. The report was done in a compressed timeframe to
provide a representative picture of oil spill planning and pre-
paredness across the country. To accomplish this task, the
United States Coast Guard and the United States Environ-
mental Protection Agency provided a leadership role for the
NRT which directed federal, regional, and local offices to
evaluate the effectiveness of their oil spill contingency plans.
The report represents the combined efforts of hundreds of
individuals, including Coast Guard and EPA On-Scene Coor-
dinators.

Subject index keywords: Oil pollution, Pollution control, Su-
perfund.

0932 Oil Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasures
Program. Task Force Report

Order Number PB91-213868CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 13 May 88
The study was initiated in response to the January 2, 1988,
release of approximately one million gallons of diesel fuel
from the Ashland Oil Facility in Floreffe, PA, and the subse-
quent contamination of the Monongahela and the Ohio
Rivers. The spill was caused by the tank flowed over the sur-
rounding dike and found its way into the Monongahela and
Ohio Rivers. As a result of the spill, fifteen water intakes
were shut down, water supplies to over 2.7 million residents
were disrupted, schools and businesses were closed, and
thousands of fish and waterfowl were destroyed.
Specifications: 104p.

Subject index keywords: Oil spills, Water pollution control,
Water pollution abatement, Contingency planning.

0933 OPA Q's and A's: Overview of the Oil Pollution Act
of 1990

Order Number PB92-963348CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 91
The OPA Q's and A's are part of a series of fact sheets that
provide up-to-date information on EPA's implementation of
the OPA. The first fact sheet provides an overview of the
various provisions of the OPA and the Agency's responsibil-
ities under the new law.

173

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Public Information &
Outreach

Subject index keywords: Pollution laws, Oil pollution, Water
pollution abatment, Superfund.

0934 OPA Update: Implementation of the Oil Pollution Act
of 1990. Volume 2, Number 1

Order Number PB92-963420CDH, price; PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response*, Aug 92
The issue includes information on facility response plans, the
Environmental Response Team, mechanical containment
and recovery of oil, and the recent designation of Areas
under the OPA.

Subject index keywords: Oil pollution, Monongahela River.

0935 Overview of ERNS: Emergency Response
Notification System (ERNS) Fact Sheet

Order Number PB92-963412CDH, price; PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 92
The fact sheet provides an overview of the Emergency Re-
sponse Notification System (ERNS), a national computer da-
tabase used to store information on releases of oil and haz-
ardous substances.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Oil spills, Water pollution, Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Emergency Re-
sponse Notification System.

0936 Update on Implementation of the Oil Pollution Act
of 1990. Volume 1, Number 1, February 1991

Order Number PB91-921370CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 91
The report is one of a series of bulletins intended to provide
up-to-date information on EPA's implementation of the vari-
ous provisions of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA). Each
'Update' highlights activities of EPA headquarters and field
staff as they develop and enforce the regulations and poli-
cies of the high-priority oil pollution program. The 'Update' in-
cludes notes from the Regional Workgroup meeting in Gal-
veston, questions and answers concerning OPA, a timeline
of major EPA activities/deadlines associated with the OPA,
and a list of EPA Implementation Workgroups.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.

Subject index keywords: Oil pollution, Pollution control, Su-
perfund.

0937 Update on Implementation of the Oil Pollution Act
of 1990. Volume 1, Number 2, April 1991

Order Number PB91-921371CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 91
This is one of a series of bulletins intended to provide up-to-
date information on EPA's implementation of the various pro-
visions of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA). Each 'Update'
highlights activities of EPA headquarters and field staff as
they develop and enforce the regulations and policies of the
high-priority oil pollution program. The 'Update' includes a
spill exercise in Baltimore, MD, practical issues on spill plan-
ning/response, the San Diego Oil Spill Conference, the
Exxon Valdez (Lessons Learned and What If), oil spills re-
ported in the U.S. (1988-1990), and interim guidelines for
bioremedlation.

Subject index keywords: Oil pollution, Pollution control, Su-
perfund.

0938 Update on Implementation of the Oil Pollution Act
of 1990. Volume 1, Number 3, June 1991

Order Number PB91-921372CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jun 91
The report is one of a series of bulletins intended to provide
up-to-date information on EPA's implmenetation of the vari-
ous provisions of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA). Each
'Update' highlights activities of EPA headquarters and field
staff as they develop and enforce the regulations and poli-
cies of the high-priority oil pollution program. The 'Update' in-
cludes an overview of EPA's Oil Spill Prevention and Re-
sponse Program, the Bioremediation Spill Response Pian, a
roundtable on the National Contingency Plan (NCP), and oil
spill statistics.

Subject index keywords: Oil pollution, Pollution control, Su-
perfund.

PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Public
Information & Outreach

0939 Integrating Removal and Remedial Site Assessment
Investigations

Order Number PB93-963341CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
Increased efficiency and shorter response times are the pri-
mary objectives of integrating removal and remedial site as-
sessment investigations under the Superfund Accelerated
Cleanup Model (SACM). This is based on the assumption
that there is duplication of effort between the programs. The
fact sheet examines areas of duplication and key differences
between the two types of investigations, and describes some
approaches for integrating assessments. The primary audi-

174

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Public Information &

Outreach

ence for this information is the site assessment community
which includes EPA On-Scene Coordinators (OSCs) and Site
Assessment Managers (SAMs), their counterparts in state or
other federal agencies, and assessment contractors.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 8p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Site characterization,
Risk assessment.

0940 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide (Bog Creek Farm)

Order Number PB92-963612CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 1992
The Superfund at Work bulletin series profiles hazardous
waste cleanup efforts nationwide. This issue profiles the Bog
Creek Farm site, a chicken farm in Howell Township, New
Jersey, where chemical solvents and other wastes were
dumped between 1973 and 1974.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0941 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide (City Industries)

Order Number PB92-963619CDH, price; PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 1992
The Fact Sheet profiles the EPA's successful cleanup of City
Industries, a former waste handling facility. Because of quick
and effective cooperation between the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) and the Florida Department of Envi-
ronmental Regulation (FDER) eliminated the threats posed
by the City Industries hazardous waste site in the community
of Goldenrod, Florida. The decisive actions taken by EPA
and FDER at City Industries illustrate Superfund's commit-
ment to protecting citizens and the environment, as well as
the Agency's diligence in making polluters pay for cleaning
up the environmental damage they have caused.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 7p.

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0942 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (American Thermostat
Corporation, New York)

Order Number PB92-963627CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1992
EPA's Superfund program decisively mitigated dangerously
high levels of toxic chemicals at New York's American Ther-
mostat Corporation (ATC) hazardous waste site. Superfund
staff: quickly sampled area drinking wells and treated over 10
million gallons of contaminated ground water; used innova-

tive technologies to reduce on-site soil and ground water
contamination; secured a permanent alternate water supply
for affected residents; and initiated a public outreach effort
which gained support for cleanup activities. The American
Thermostat site is a prime example of EPA's commitment to
preserve the health and welfare of citizens and the environ-
ment.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Remedial
action, Waste management, Superfund, South Cairo(New
York), Cleanup operations.

0943 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992, (Celanese Corporation Site
Profile)

Order Number PB92-963617CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1992
The fact sheet discusses the Superfund site Celanese Cor-
poration in Shelby, NC. The U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency's (EPA) Superfund program has reached some major
milestones at a hazardous waste site in Shelby, North Caroli-
na. The site's success is underscored by the fact that the
polluter, Hoechst-Celanese Corporation, took the initiative to
perform the cleanup of the hazardous waste found on their
property.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials.

0944 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Ciba-Geigy Corporation,
Mcintosh, Alabama)

Order Number PB92-963630CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1992
On March 31, 1992, the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) reached an agreement with Ciba-Geigy Corpo-
ration in Mcintosh, Alabama to clean up soil and ground
water contaminated by DDT, herbicides, and chemicals. The
agreement is one of tie largest private party settlements in
Superfund history, valued at approximately $120 million. EPA
activities at the site included: conducting preliminary contami-
nation investigations jointly with the Alabama Environmental
Health Administration, beginning in 1979; designing a multi-
phased cleanup that is responsive to the complex nature of
the contamination and reduces potential risk to the local
population and environment; and awarding a grant to a com-
munity group to help them participate in cleanup decisions.
Ciba-Geigy, like EPA, has made consistent efforts to build
and maintain good relations with the community. These ef-
forts demonstrate the increasing trend toward cooperation
between industries, local communities, and EPA at Super-
fund sites.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,

175

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Public Information &
Outreach

and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Waste management, Hazardous materials,
Mclntosh(Alabama), Cleanup operations.

0945 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Krysowaty Farm,
Hillsborough, New Jersey)

Order Number PB92-963629CDH, price; PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1992
The one-acre dump at Krysowaty Farm was small in size
compared to some other Superfund sites. But five years of
dumping proved to be a challenge when designing an appro-
priate cleanup. Nevertheless, the U.S. Environmental Protec-
tion Agency (EPA) quickly and efficiently alleviated immedi-
ate and potential dangers to the community of Hillsborough,
New Jersey. In less than five months, Superfund staff:
worked closely with community members and Hillsborough
Township officials to ensure an effective solution; funded a
permanent alternate water supply for residents threatened by
contaminated well water; and completed a permanent clean-
up of hazardous wastes at the site. Krysowaty Farm is a
good example of how an active community, coupled with
EPA responsiveness and expertise, can eliminate the dan-
gers posed by the unauthorized dumping of hazardous sub-
stances.

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,

Remedial action, Waste management, Hillsborough
Township(New Jersey), Cleanup operations.

0946 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Lansdowne Radioactive
Residence Site Profile)

Order Number PB92-963625CDH, price; PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1992
The fact sheet gave a general overview of the Superfund
clean-up of a Lansdowne, PA house, the only residential site
placed on the EPA's National Priorities List and the first non-
federal radiation site cleaned up under Superfund. The base-
ment of the house had been Dr. Dicran Kabakjian's unregu-
lated radium processing laboratory from 1924 to 1944. The
house and the soil surrounding it had to be completely
cleared away because both were seriously contaminated with
radon gas and gamma radiation. As a result, the EPA estab-
lished the precedent for setting radiation levels in residential
areas, applying more stringent levels than those set by the
Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. I0p.

Subject index keywords: Pennsylvania, Radioactive wastes,
Waste disposal, Superfund, Lansdowne(Pennsylvania).

0947 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Valley of the Drums,

Bullitt County, Kentucky)

Order Number PB92-963618CDH, price; PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1992
The Superfund program was designed to mitigate the dan-
gers posed by improper disposal of hazardous waste. The
A.L. Taylor site, also known as 'Valley of the Drums', was
one of the first challenges to Superfund. Valley of the Drums
was the scene of one of the largest drum removals in the
history of the program. The successful cleanup was accom-
plished through some notable achievements, including: a sig-
nificant reduction of risks to local citizens and the environ-
ment due to several emergency removal actions; use of
state-of-the-art cleanup technologies; combined efforts be-
tween the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and
the Kentucky Department of Natural Resources and Environ-
mental Protection (KDNREP); and recovery of $1.8 million of
EPA's cleanup costs from polluters. The cooperative effort
among EPA, State and local groups culminated in a cleanup
of tremendous proportions and a safe community and envi-
ronment.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Remedial action, Drums(Containers), Waste management,
Bullitt County(Kentucky), Cleanup operations.

0948 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Wide Beach Section of
Brant, New York)

Order Number PB92-963628CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1992
Wide-spread contamination of polychlorinated biphenyls
(PCBs) threatened the Wide Beach section of Brant, New
York, a popular vacation resort. EPA's Superfund program
effectively completed a permanent cleanup of Wide Beach in
the span of one year. Other highlights included: a new and
innovative technology to remove PCB contamination; reduc-
tion of PCBs to one-fifth of acceptable levels; temporary relo-
cation of residents who were concerned for their health while
cleanup activities took place; newly paved roads and drive-
ways, re-landscaped yards, and a new storm sewer system;
and restoration of ecologically sensitive wetlands. EPA's
achievements significantly reduced PCB risks at Wide Beach,
and left a satisfied community in Brant.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action, Haz-
ardous materials, Waste management, Oil spills, BrantfNew
York), Cleanup operations.

176

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Public Information &

Outreach

0949 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1993 (Big D Campground Site
Profile, Ashtabula County, Kingsville, Ohio)

Order Number PB94-963608CDH, price: Standing Order, call
for price

Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
A quarter mile from the old Big D Campground, a sand and
gravel quarry in Ashtabula County, Ohio served as a landfill
for solvents, caustic chemicals and oily substances. High-
lights of the overall effort included: Destruction of 93,000
cubic yards and 14,000 drums of hazardous materials; Ex-
traction and treatment of ground water, including a 30-year
monitoring program; and An interactive community relations
program that fostered public participation in the cleanup
process.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management.

0950 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1993 (Brown Wood Preserving
Site Profile, Suwanee County, Florida)

Order Number PB94-963601CDH, price: Standing Order, call
for price

Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
The Superfund at Work bulletin series profiles hazardous
waste cleanup efforts nationwide. This issue profiles the
Brown Wood Preserving Site near Live Oak, Florida, where
creosote and other toxic chemicals used for pressure-treat-
ing lumber and other wood products polluted 55 acres of
Suwanee County, Florida. Much of the indigenous wildlife
disappeared from the area due to progressive soil and sur-
face water contamination. Cleanup activities costing nearly
$2.8 million were funded by the facility owners under a coop-
erative settlement agreement, called a consent decree.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p,

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management.

0951 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1993 (Bunker Hill Site Profile,
Silver Valley, Northern Idaho)

Order Number PB94-963604CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
Residents in the communities surrounding the Bunker Hill
smelter facility in northern Idaho faced a dangerous problem;
extensive lead contamination from decades of refining mined
ores. Stack emissions caused a variety of environmental and
human health problems. Other organizations intervened to
conduct a variety of activities including: A lead health screen-
ing and education program; Removal and replacement of
contaminated soil at public parks and playgrounds; Removal
and replacement of contaminated residential yard soil; and
Efforts to rebuild the local economy following the facility's
closure.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Cleanup, Superfund, Northern Region(ldaho),

0952 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1993 (.Johns-Manville Site Profile,
Illinois)

Order Number PB94-963602CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
The Superfund at Work Bulletin senes profiles hazardous
waste cleanup efforts nationwide. This issue profiles the
Johns-Manville Superfund site. Manufacturing wastes laden
with asbestos and toxic substances were dumped for more
than 70 years into pits forming an enormous landfill. Industri-
al wastewater pooled into acres of settling ponds. Airborne
asbestos endangered workers and threatened ecological
habitat in an adjacent state park and along Lake Michigan.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Asbestos,
Cleanup, Superfund, Pollution control, Heavy metals,
Profile(lllinois).

0953 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide (McKin Company)

Order Number PB92-963620CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 1992
The Fact Sheet profiles the McKin Company Site, a waste
collection, transfer, and disposal facility in Gray, Maine, and
that site's successful cleanup. The McKin site is hailed as
one of the most successful Superfund cleanups in New Eng-
land and the nation. The site has proven to be a landmark
achievement in public and private cooperation since its dis-
covery over ten years ago. The U.S. Environmental Protec-
tion Agency (EPA), the State of Maine, local officials, and
companies responsible for contributing to the contamination
worked closely together to identify threats to the community
and the surrounding area, remove hazardous liquids, and de-
contaminate 12,000 cubic yards of polluted soil. The resi-
dents of Gray, Maine can now rest assured that hazardous
waste at the McKin site no longer threatens their community.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 9p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

177

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Public Information &
Outreach

0954 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (French Limited Site
Profile, Harris County, Texas)

Order Number PB93-963609CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) negotiated
a major cleanup at the French Limited site, working with the
Texas Water Commission (TWO) and the French Limited
Task Group (FLTG). EPA's Superfund program: employed an
innovative technology to clean up 300,000 cubic yards of
hazardous waste; negotiated an agreement, known as a con-
sent decree, in which FLTG pays for all cleanup costs and
future oversight expenses; ensured the planting and preser-
vation of 23 acres of wetlands near the site; and awarded
the nation's 75th Superfund Technical Assistance Grant to a
local group so that the community is kept informed. Coopera-
tion between all parties demonstrates how the Superfund
program cleans up hazardous waste sites.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Texas, Hazardous ma-
terials, Waste disposal, Remedial action, Cleanup operations,
Bioremediation.

0955 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Fulton Terminals Site
Profile, Oswego County, NY)

Order Number PB93-963616CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) achieved
some unique successes at the Fulton Terminals hazardous
waste site in New York. After 35 years as a manufacturing
facility, millions of gallons of waste oils and sludges were im-
properly stored here enroute to an incinerator. Tank leaks
and spillage contaminated soil, ground water and the
Oswego River. EPA's Superfund program: Settled with 59 of
60 hazardous waste contributors to conduct a comprehen-
sive $4 million cleanup and reimburse EPA $500,000 for past
costs; Created an unprecedented financial arrangement that
guaranteed payments from both major and minor parties, en-
suring the timely cleanup of the site; and Worked with area
citizens to award a Technical Assistance Grant, ensuring
their participation in the selection of the remedy and in the
oversight of cleanup operations.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials, Pollution control, Fulton(New York).

0956 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Harvey and Knott Drum
Site, New Castle County, Delaware)

Order Number PB93-963614CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
From 1963 to 1969, two acres of the Harvey and Knott Drum
site in New Castle County, Delaware served as an open
dump and burning area for sanitary, municipal, and industrial

wastes. Sludge, paint pigment, and solvents contaminated
the site until the State of Delaware and the U.S. Environmen-
tal Protection Agency (EPA) intervened in 1981. Site condi-
tions required a combination of traditional cleanup measures.
After the immediate health threats posed by the site were
eliminated, EPA reached an innovative, 'mixed funding' set-
tlement for long-term cleanup with two parties responsible
for the site contamination. The following actions highlight the
success of the Superfund program: An emergency removal
of contaminants reduced immediate environmental and
public health effects; A rapid assessment of ground water
safeguarded drinking water supplies; and The full coopera-
tion of General Motors (GM) expedited implementation of the
cleanup, valued at $3.2 million.

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Water pollution control, New Castle
County(Delaware).

0957 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Old Midland Products
Site Profile, Yell County, Arkansas)

Order Number PB93-963608CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
The Old Midland Products site in Yell County, Arkansas was
contaminated by hazardous chemicals from operations of a
wood preserving plant. The U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) worked closely with the Arkansas Department
of Pollution Control and Ecology (ADPCE) to select a clean-
up plan to remediate the site, allowing unrestricted use by
1998. EPA and ADPCE actions consisted of: treating over 11
million gallons of contaminated surface water and lagoon liq-
uids; employing a highly efficient, transportable incinerator to
destroy more than 85,000 tons of contaminated soil and
lagoon sludges over a short period of time; installing recov-
ery wells to treat an estimated 450,000 gallons of contami-
nated ground water; and maintaining effective community re-
lations with local residents to address their concerns and in-
volve them in the cleanup process. The site serves as an ex-
ample of how EPA, state agencies, and local residents can
work together to restore the environment polluted by hazard-
ous waste.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Arkansas, Waste dis-
posal, Remedial action, Hazardous materials, Cleanup oper-
ations.

0958 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Powersviile Site Profile,
Peach County, Georgia)

Order Number PB93-963611CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) encoun-
tered much more than a municipal landfill at the Powersviile
site in Peach County, Georgia. Contamination from improper-

178

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Public Information &

Outreach

ly dumped hazardous wastes and pesticides tainted an old
quarry used for household garbage. Chemicals migrating into
area ground water threatened local drinking water supplies.
To address these issues, EPA's Superfund program de-
signed a cleanup strategy that included: negotiating with the
county and chemical companies to contain the hazardous
wastes on site underneath a protective cover; investigating
reports of drinking water contamination and extending munic-
ipal water lines to affected residents; and conducting a tai-
lored community relations program to inform and educate
residents about the site.

Subject index keywords; Georgia, Earth fills, Pesticides,
Superfund.

0959 Superfund at Work; Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Radium Chemical Site
Profile, Queens, New York)

Order Number PB93-963612CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
The Radium Chemical hazardous waste site in Queens, New
York was contaminated with radium, posing a grave potential
threat to the community. The U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) used the Superfund program to design a long-
term cleanup for the site using input from citizens and the
business community. Superfund staff: Mobilized a quick
cleanup action to remove 10,000 small containers of radium;
Developed a streamlined approach to long-term cleanup; Se-
cured the site to reduce the possibility of radiation exposure
to the local residents; Cooperated with the community to
design a well-organized emergency response plan; and Edu-
cated local citizens about site hazards, incorporating commu-
nity concerns into the cleanup process. The Radium Chemi-
cal site is a clear example of EPA's effective management
and problem-solving strategies at Superfund sites.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $450). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.

Subject index keywords: New York, Superfund, Radioactive
materials, Remedial action.

0960 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Triana/Tennessee River
Site, Alabama)

Order Number PB93-963603CDH, price; PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
The fact sheet of Superfund at Work profiles the successful
cleanup of the Triana/Tennessee River site through the Su-
perfund program. The site's success is measured not only by
the innovative measures taken to cleanse the river system,
but by the full cooperation of Olin throughout the enforce-
ment process. Olin Chemical Corporation and EPA's efforts
at the Triana/Tennessee River site have achieved, in the
words of former Assistant EPA Regional Administrator
Howard Zeller, 'a major victory for the environment.'
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,

and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 8p.

Subject index keywords: Waste management, Superfund,
Hazardous materials, Water pollution control, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response.

0961 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (United Chrome
Products Ste Profile)

Order Number PB93-963607CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993

The issue of the Superfund at Work series profiles the suc-
cessful Superfund cleanup of the United Chrome Products
site in Oregon.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Waste management, Hazardous materials, Chromium, Clean-
up operations.

0962 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Army Creek Landfill
Site Profile, New Castle, Delaware)

Order Number PB93-963627CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
The Superfund at Work bulletin series profiles hazardous
waste cleanup efforts nationwide. This issue profiles the
Army Creek Landfill in New Castle, Delaware, where public
water supplies and fragile wetlands were at risk from hazard-
ous waste dumping in the 1960s. EPA negotiated a $25 mil-
lion cleanup of the landfill, ground water, and surface water;
and settled with 18 parties to recover $1 million in past
cleanup costs.

Subject index keywords; Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Cleanup, Superfund, New Castle(Delaware),

0963 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Chlsman Creek Site
Profile, York County, Virginia)

Order Number PB94-963607CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
The Chisman Creek hazardous waste site in York County,
Virginia was once contaminated with by-products generated
from a nearby power station. Under two cooperative agree-
ments, known as consent decrees, Virginia Power: Designed
a $10 million site cleanup; Supplied municipal water service
to affected residents; and Constructed a drainage and water
treatment plant to remove contaminants from area ground
water.

Specifications Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p,

179

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Public Information &

Outreach

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Cleanup, Superfund, York County(Virginia).

0964 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Coal Creek Site
Profile, Chehalis, Washington)

Order Number PB94-963609CDH, price; Standing Order, call
for price

Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) designed a
remedy that will permanently remove polychlorinated biphen-
yls (PCBs), lead, and copper from the Coal Creek site in
Chehalis, Washington. Through careful negotiations, EPA se-
cured the participation of all 86 waste contributors to con-
duct the cleanup, valued between $13 and $15 million. The
Coal Creek site illustrates the need for a federal enforcement
program to ensure that waste contributors conduct compre-
hensive cleanups that protect citizens and the environment
EPA took the lead in coordinating cleanup activities, an im-
portant intervention at a time when the state did not yet have
its own hazardous waste cleanup law.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management.

0965 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Common Steps In the
Removal Process)

Order Number PB93-963631CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
The Superfund at Work bulletin series profiles hazardous
waste cleanup efforts nationwide. This issue profiles removal
efforts in Region 1. The removal team quickly responds to
hazardous waste emergencies and undertakes early actions
at abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous waste sites. These
activities generally cost less than $2 million and last no more
than 12 months.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Cleanup, Superfund, Boston(Massachusetts).

0966 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 {Eastern Diversified
Metals Site Profile, Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania)

Order Number PB93-963628CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993

The Superfund at Work bulletin series profiles hazardous
waste cleanup efforts nationwide. This issue profiles the
Eastern Diversified Metals Site in Rush Township, Schuylkill
County, PA, where more than 350 million pounds of plastic
insulation was found forming an enormous mountain on the
property. This was the firs

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,

and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Cleanup, Superfund, Rush Township(Pennsylvania),
Schuylkill County(Pennsylvania).

0967 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Fike/Artel Chemical
Site Profile, Nitro, West Virginia)

Order Number PB93-963626CDH, price; PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
The Superfund at Work bulletin series profiles hazardous
waste cleanup efforts nationwide. The issue profiles the
Fike/Artel Chemical Site in Nitro, West Virginia, where a
composite of highly toxic and potentially explosive contami-
nants were dumped. The site is a good example of how
EPA's Superfund program responds to emergency situations
by taking quick actions as well as cleaning up large volumes
of hazardous waste.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials. Waste dis-
posal, Cleanup, Superfund, Nitro(West Virginia).

0968 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Northside Landfill Site
Profile, Spokane, Washington)

Order Number PB94-963611CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
Cleanup of the Northside Landfill in Spokane, Washington is
an example of effective collaboration with state and local
governments in addressing a Superfund hazardous waste
site. City officials recognized that the landfill had reached ca-
pacity, local wells were contaminated, and ground water
needed thorough treatment. EPA and Ecology worked with
Spokane's Department of Solid Waste Management to: Pro-
vide a clean source of drinking water and construct a state-
of-the-art plastic cover to cap the landfill and guard against
the further spread of contaminants.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Cleanup, Superfund, Spokane(Washington State).

0969 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Rogue Valley/Ditch
Creek Ranch Site Profile, Wimer, Oregon)

Order Number PB93-963629CDH, price; PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
The Superfund at Work bulletin series profiles hazardous
waste cleanup efforts nationwide. This issue profiles the
Rogue Valley/Ditch Creek Ranch Site in Wimer, Oregon,
where a company president used his own rach to illegally
dump industrial wastes generated at his electroplating facility
in a nearby town. The contamination spread over 18 acres of
the Ditch Creek Ranch, endangering local water supplies and

180

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION; Public Information &

Outreach

wildlife. This case was the largest criminal action ever taken
in the State of Oregon for environmental pollution.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous wastes, Waste dispos-
al, Cleanup, Superfund, Wimer(Orcgon).

0970 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Tri-State Plating Site
Profile, Columbus, Indiana)

Order Number PB93-963615CDH, price: PC A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) cleans up
hazardous wastes on land, in the air, and in water. Each Su-
perfund site is uniquely problematic, therefore every cleanup
selected must meet the specific needs of the community. At
the Tri-State Plating site in Columbus, Indiana, EPA removed
27 barrels of electroplating waste from this quiet neighbor-
hood site; demolished on-site buildings and removed more
than 2,400 cubic yards of contaminated soil; and accessed a
municipal wastewater treatment plant to treat polluted ground
water, saving approximately $700,000 in costs. In addition to
trimming five years off the cleanup schedule, EPA addressed
community concerns regarding the actions being taken to
remedy the site for future use.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action, Haz-
ardous materials, Waste management, Water pollution con-
trol, Cleanup operations.

0971 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide (White Chemical)

Order Number PB92-963611CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Waste Programs Enforcement; 1992
The Superfund at Work Bulletin series profiles hazardous
waste cleanup efforts nationwide. This issue profiles the
White Chemical site, a former chemical processing facility in
Newark, New Jersey, where nearly 11,000 drums of hazard-
ous waste and chemical contaminants were stored from
1984 to 1989.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; alt others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 8p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0972 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1993. (Wells G and H Site,
Woburn, Massachusetts)

Order Number PB93-963601CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1993
The document profiles the Superfund cleanup of the Wells G
and H site in Woburn, Massachusetts. One year later, com-
prehensive cleanup activities have begun at four of the site's

five property areas. Contamination of the wells was discov-
ered in 1979 when local residents suspected that an unusu-
ally high incidence of childhood leukemia was linked to drink-
ing water. EPA's Superfund enforcement efforts yielded a
resolution in which: settling parties agreed to a cleanup
worth approximately $70 million, the largest Superfund settle-
ment in New England. The agreement directs cleanup of four
properties simultaneously; EPA achieved the record settle-
ment in only four months of negotiations; and initially recalci-
trant polluters realized they were better off cooperating with
the Superfund proces, and are working with both EPA and
the community as partners.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Waste management, Hazardous materials, Cleanup.

0973 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1994 (Bailey Waste Disposal
Site Profile, Texas)

Order Number PB94-963613CDH, price; PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste aid Emergency Response; 1994
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Texas
Natural Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC), and
10 private companies have succeeded in suspending serious
environmental damage at the Bailey Waste Disposal Site.
Through EPA's Superfund program, the cleanup will prevent
the spread of hazardous petroleum compounds and heavy
metals into valuable wetlands leading to the Gulf of Mexico.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Cleanup, Superfund.

0974 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1994 (New Brighton Site
Profile, Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota)

Order Number PB94-963615CDH, price: Standing Order, call
for price

Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1994
Billions of rounds of small-arms ammunition were manufac-
tured at the Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant (TCAAP),
supporting the military in three major wars. During the course
of production, solvents and hazardous chemical wastes mi-
grated into area ground water, contaminating municipal and
private wells. Highlights of the overall cleanup effort have in-
cluded: removal of nearly 232,000 pounds of solvents from
soil using an innovative technology, soil vapor extraction;
treatment of more than six billion gallons of ground water
from TCAAP extraction wells; and construction of two treat-
ment plants to purify municipal water supplies in neighboring
cities. The TCAAP property includes wetlands and undis-
turbed natural habitat supporting an extensive variety of wild-
life. Related cleanup efforts mil protect a sensitive ecosys-
tem currently sustained as a refuge despite increasing urban
pressures.

181

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION; QA/QC Laboratory
Program

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund. Hazardous materials,
Waste management.

0975 Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Cleanup
Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1994 {Seymour Recycling Site
Profile, Seymour, Indiana)

Order Number PB94-963612CDH, price; PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1994
Leaking barrels of chemicals reacted and erupted into spon-
taneous fires and explosions at the Seymour Recycling Cor-
poration in the 1970s. The poorly managed and overbur-
dened hazardous waste storage and incineration facility pol-
luted soil and ground water with solvents, acids, and heavy
metals. With help from the Indiana Department of Environ-
mental Management (IDEM) and the City of Seymour, coop-
erative efforts lead to an effective remediation of the site in-
cluding: an immediate removal of drums, tanks and soil; a
comprehensive ground water treatment system and exten-
sion of the municipal water supply to affected residents; and
use of two innovative technologies, bioremediation and soil
vapor extraction.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Cleanup, Superfund, Semour(lndiana).

0976 Superfund: Environmental Progress

Order Number PB93-206209CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 90
While Superfund has made many gains in terms of protection
of human health and the environment, to date little attention
has been paid to any measures other than the number of
sites deleted from the National Priorities List. The report ex-
plains some of Superfund's environmental progress in terms
of new measures called environmental indicators. These indi-
cators relate to: (1) Controlling Acute Threats to People and
the Environment; (2) Achieving Long-Term Cleanup Goals for
Sites; and (3) Removing Contamination from the Environ-
ment.

Specifications: See also PB91-921203.14p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Project management,

Progress.

0977 Superfund Program: Ten Years of Progress

Order Number PB91-921286CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jun 91
The review provides a candid self-evaluation of past program
activities and achievements, identifies conflicting mandates
and needs for program enhancements, and makes a commit-
ment to following a practical plan for the future. This plan is
based on a set of eight strategic goals. The contents are:
Legislative and Regulatory Framework; Removal Actions;
Site Assessment Activities; Remedial Activity; The Enforce-
ment Program; Public Participation In Decisionmaking; Roles
of States and Indian Tribes; Management Infrastructure;

Future Directions and Challenges; EPA Superfund Offices;
and For More Information.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Project
management, US EPA, Reviews, Superfund.

0978 Understanding Oil Spills and Oil Spill Response

Order Number PB93-963409CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 93
The volume contains individual sections that outline what oil
spills are, their potential effects on the environment, how
they are cleaned up, and how various agencies prepare for
spills before they happen.

Subject index keywords: Environmental protection, Oil
spills, Water pollution effects.

PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION; QA/

QC Laboratory Program

0979 Data Quality Objectives Decision Error Feasibility
Trials (DEFT) Beta Version 1.01. User's Guide

Order Number PB94-963222CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 2 Aug 93
One of the most intensive steps in the Data Quality Objec-
tives (DQO) Process is the final step, Optimize the Design.
During this step, the entire set of DQO outputs are incorpo-
rated into a sampling design. If the DQO constraints are not
feasible, it may be necessary to iterate through one or more
of the earlier steps of the DQO Process to identify a sam-
pling design that will meet the budget and generate data that
are adequate for the decision. The proposed PC package
should reduce the intensiveness of this step by allowing a
decision maker or member of the DQO planning team to
generate information about several simple sampling designs
based on the DQO constraints. Through this process, the de-
cision maker can evaluate whether these constraints are ap-
propriate or feasible before the sampling and analysis design
team begins identifying a sampling design.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Pollution sampling,
Data Quality Objectives.

182

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION; QA/QC Laboratory

Program

0980 Data Quality Objectives for Remedial Response
Activities; Development Process, Example Scenario: Rl/
FS Activities at a Site with Contaminated Soils and
Ground Water

Order Number PB90-272634CDH, price: PC A13/MF A02
CDM Federal Programs Corp., Annandale, VA.;

Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 87
The two volumes provide guidance for developing data qual-
ity objectives (DQOs) for site-specific Remedial Investiga-
tion/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) activities. Qualitative and quan-
titative standards required to support RI/FS activities are
specified. A formal approach to the development of DQOs in
the sampling/analytical plan to improve the quality and cost-
effectiveness of data collection and analysis activities is pro-
vided.

Specifications: Also pub. as Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response rept. no. OSWER DIRECTIVE-9355.0-7B. See also
P388-131370 and PB88-131388. Sponsored by Environmen-
tal Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of Emergency
and Remedial Response. 287p.

Subject index keywords: Waste disposal, Guidelines, US
EPA Regions 1-10, Remedial action, Remedial response, Su-
perfund.

0981 Data Quality Objectives Process for Superfund

Order Number PB94-963205CDH, price: PC A01 /MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 93
The fact sheet describes the Interim Final Guidance on the
Data Quality Objectives Process for Superfund (September
1993). The new guidance supersedes previous 1987 Super-
fund guidance on Data Quality Objectives (DQOs), Data
Quality Objectives for Remedial Response Activities: Devel-
opment Process, EPA/540/G-87/003 (PB88-131370). The
fact sheet also introduces the Guidance for Conducting Envi-
ronmental Data Quality Assessment and the DQO Decision
Error Feasibility Trials software.

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Data Quality Objectives.

0982 Data Quality Objectives Process for Superfund

Order Number PB94-963207CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 93
The pamphlet describes the Data Quality Objectives Process
for Superfund.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Data quality, Pollution
sampling.

0983 Data Quality Objectives Process for Superfund:
Interim Final Guidance

Order Number PB94-963203CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 93
This document provides guidance on developing Data Quality
Objectives (DQOs) for Superfund sites. This guidance re-
places EPA/540/G-87/003, Data Quality Objectives for Re-
medial Response Activities: Development Process (PB90-
272634). The DQO Process is a series of planning steps
based on the Scientific Method that is designed to ensure
that the type, quantity, and quality of enviromental data used
In decision making are appropriate for the intended applica-
tion. The DQO Process was developed by EPA to help
Agency personnel collect data that are important to decision
making. The process allows decision makers to define their
data requirements and acceptable levels of decision errors
during planning, before any data are collected. Application of
the DQO Process should result in data collection designs
that will yield results of appropriate quality for defensible de-
cision making.

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Pollution sampling,
Data Quality Objectives.

0984 Data Quality Objectives Process for Superfund:
Workbook

Order Number PB94-963204CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 93
The workbook assists the user in implementing the Data
Quality Objective (DQO) Process for Superfund by providing
concise descriptions of each of the seven steps as well as
space to document the outputs of the current study. Hie
workbook is organized in a sequential, step-by-step fashion
to help the user consider all aspects in the DQO planning
Process. The steps described are as follows: State the Prob-
lem; Identify the Decision; Identify the Inputs to the Decision;
Define the Boundaries of the Study; Develop a Decision
Rule; Specify Limits on Decision Errors; and Optimize the
Design. Each step is one component in the DQO Process.
The first section of this workbook provides a summary of the
purpose of each step. If more detailed information is re-
quired, the reader should refer to 'Date Quality Objectives
Process for Superfund: Interim Final Guidance,' EPA540-R-
93-071 (PB94-963203). Following the summaries, each step
is discussed in detail, listing all the activities that should be
considered to complete that step.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Pollution sampling,
Data Quality Objectives.

183

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION; QA/QC Laboratory
Program

0985 Decentralization of Superfund Bottle Repository
Functions

Order Number PB90-249558CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 1 Sep 89
The directive provides guidance for decentralizing the acqui-
sition of Superfund sampling bottles from OERR to the Re-
gions and their support contractors. It reiterates and expands
on information previously provided to the Environmental
Services Division personnel responsible for bottle acquisition.
Specifications: 43 p.

Subject index keywords: Regulations,
Decentralization(Dispersal), Superfund, Bottle repositories,
Preremedial action, Sampling bottles, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response.

0986 Extending the Tracking of Analytical Services to
Potentially Responsible Party-Lead Superfund Sites
(Supplemental Guidance on OSWER Directive 9240.0-2A)

Order Number PB93-963502CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 6 Jul 92
The memorandum provides procedures for tracking Potential-
ly Responsible Parly (PRP) analytical services on a national
basis in accordance with EPA policy.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Potentially responsible parties.

0987 Guidance on Applying the Data Quality Objectives
Process for Ambient Air Monitoring Around Superfund
Sites (Stage 3}

Order Number PB90-204611CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Research Triangle Inst., Research Triangle Park, NC.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,
NC. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards; Mar 90
The document along with a previous document (EPA-450/4-
89-015, August 1989) covering Stages I and II, provides an
illustration of how the data quality objectives (DQO) process
is used to design an ambient air monitoring system that will
be adequate for the intended use of the data. The two docu-
ments combined are intended to serve as a bridge between
the Quality Assurance Management Staff's (QAMS') DQO
guidance and an actual application of the DQO process at a
Superfund site. The document illustrates the process of de-
veloping a monitoring system for volatile organic compounds
in the ambient air to the point of submitting the design to the
decision maker for approval.

Specifications: See also PB90-204603. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. 66p.

Subject index keywords: Monitoring, Air pollution, Hazard-
ous materials, Superfund.

0988 Guidance on Applying the Data Quality Objectives
Process for Ambient Air Monitoring Around Superfund
Sites (Stages 1 and 2)

Order Number PB90-204603CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Research Triangle Inst., Research Triangle Park, NC.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,
NC. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards; Aug 89
The document provides direction and assistance on how the
data quality objectives process is used to design an ambient
air monitoring system around a Superfund site. Examples are
given for Stage I (preliminary decision) and Stage II (refine-
ment of the decision and requirements) for monitoring during
remedial action at a hypothetical Superfund site.
Specifications: See also PB90-204611. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. 52p.

Subject index keywords: Monitoring, Air pollution, Hazard-
ous materials, Superfund.

0989 Harmonization of QA Procedures for Environmental
Data Operations: Development of a National Consensus
Standard for Quality Assurance for Environmental
Programs

Order Number PB91-240523CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,
NC. Quality Assurance Management Staff.; Bechtel
Environmental, Inc., San Francisco, CA.**MAC Technical
Services, Germantown, MD.; Oct 91
Decisions on where and how to clean-up Federally-owned fa-
cilities contaminated by mixtures of hazardous chemical and
radioactive wastes requires that quality environmental data
be obtained. The Federal Government is currently using sev-
eral different standards or sets of requirements for establish-
ing the quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) proce-
dures associated with environmental data operations for
these sites. These standards defined the criteria for the QA
activities and documentation required, the content and
format of the documentation, aid who was responsible for
implementation. Shortcomings in these standards of require-
ments led in 1989 to efforts by several public and private
sector groups to 'harmonize' the multiple sets of standards
and requirements into a single set. These efforts are being
conducted under the auspices of the American Society for
Quality Control (ASQC) and involve participation by the Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency (EPA), Department of Energy
(DOE), Department of Defense (DOD), Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC), and others in the contractor and regulat-
ed communities. The paper describes the progress toward
establishing a national consensus standard for QA for envi-
ronmental programs through the ASQC standard-setting
process.

Specifications: Pub. in the Proceedings of the Annual
Energy Division Conference (19th) of the American Society
for Quality Control, Oct 91. Prepared in cooperation with
Bechtel Environmental, Inc., San Francisco, CA„ and MAC
Technical Services, Germantown, MD. 21 p.

Subject index keywords: Waste management, Federal
agencies, Hazardous materials, Radioactive wastes, Environ-
mental issues, Cleanup operations.

184

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION; QA/QC Laboratory

Program

0990 Quality and Environmental Protection: The EPA QA
Program

Order Number PB92-143791CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Quality
Assurance Management Staff; 1992
Formalized quality assurance (QA) program requirements for
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have been
established for more than ten years. During this period, the
environmental issues and concerns addressed by the EPA
have changed. Other issues, such as hazardous waste
clean-up and clean air, remain a focus of national environ-
mental concerns. As environmental issues In the 1980s
evolved, the QA program of the EPA was transformed
through the use of Total Quality Management (TQM) princi-
ples to meet the needs of the 1990s and beyond. The QA
program is structured to provide the necessary management
and technical processes to effectively plan, implement, and
assess the results of work performed in environmental pro-
grams.

Specifications; S©6 also PB91-240523. 9p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste man-
agement, Quality assurance, Superfund.

0991 Quality Assurance for Superfund Environmental
Data Collection Activities

Order Number PB93-963273CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Feb 93
The fact sheet provides Superfund program participants with
an overview of Superfund QA requirements for data collec-
tion activities. The information is pertinent to all Superfund
site managers, including remedial project managers (RPMs),
site assessment managers (SAMs), and on-scene coordina-
tors (OSCs). The information also applies to Agency contrac-
tors, states, and potentially responsible parties (PRPs) and
their contractors. The fact sheet addresses three primary
areas: (1) the mandatory QA requirements specified in
Agency policy documents; (2) QA management for Super-
fund; and (3) the process for developing SAPs for Superfund
activities. References are identified after each primary sec-
tion to provide additional information on discussion topics.
These reference materials contain guidance on the appropri-
ate quality control (QC) considerations site managers should
include as part of the QA program.

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal.

0992 Quality Assurance for the SITE (Superfund
innovative Technology Evaluation) Program
Demonstrations

Order Number PB90-159872CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab.; Maxwell Labs., Inc., San Diego,
CA; C1989

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has implemented
a rigorous quality assurance (QA) program to ensure that the
performance data generated during their Superfund Innova-
tive Technology Evaluation (SITE) Demonstration projects
are of known and adequate quality to support decisions to
use such technologies for hazardous waste site characteriza-

tions or remediations. A general overview of the ways in
which the QA program has been conducted and of the re-
sults it has produced is presented.

Specifications: Pub. in Air and Waste Management Asso-
ciation, v39 n4 p431-436 Apr 89. Prepared in cooperation
with Maxwell Labs., Inc., San Diego, CA. 9p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, SITE program.

0993 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Guidance for
Removal Activities: Sampling QA/QC Plan and Data
Validation Procedures

Order Number PB90-274481CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 90
This document provides guidance for establishing, imple-
menting, and using Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/
QC) protocols in data collection activities performed under
the Removal program. Also provides guidance in reviewing
laboratory data packages according to the guidance estab-
lished by the QA/QC protocols.

Specifications: 66p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Guidelines,
Quality assurance, Quality control, Superfund, Remedial
action, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

0994 Specifications and Guidance for Contaminant-Free
Sample Containers

Order Number PB93-963316CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 92
The document revises specifications and provides a single
source of standardized specifications and guidance on ap-
propriate cleaning procedures for preparing contaminant-free
containers that meet all Contract Laboratory Program (CLP)
detection/quantification limits, including those for low con-
centration analyses.

Subject index keywords: Pollution control, Containers,
Equipment specifications, Cleaning, Superfund.

0995 Superfund Analytical Review and Oversight

Order Number PB90-249541CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 18 Oct 88
The directive outlines procedures and responsibilities related
to review and oversight of Superfund analytical data.
Specifications: 7 p.

Subject index keywords: Regulations, Supervision, Super-
fund, Preremedial action, Office of Solid Waste and Emer-
gency Response.

0996 Total Quality Management (TQM) and Quality
Assurance (QA) in Superfund

Order Number PB91-921333CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 5 Dec 90
The directive discusses the support of Total Quality Manage-
ment and Quality Assurance by the Director of the Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response. It focuses especially on

185

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Removal Program
Management

TQM as it relates to Superfund's QA Program and the devel-
opment of Data Quality Objective (DQOs) for the Ri/FS and
RD/RA processes.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

0997 USEPA Contract Laboratory Program National
Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data Review

Order Number PB94-963502CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 94
This document is designed to offer guidance on EPA Con-
tract Laboratory Program (CLP) Inorganic analytical data
evaluation and review. In some applications it may be used
as a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). In other, more
subjective areas, only general guidance is offered due to the
complexities and uniqueness of data relative to specific sam-
ples. This document is intended to assist in the technical
review of analytical data generated through the CLP. Deter-
mining contract compliance is not the intended objective of
these guidelines. The data review process provides informa-
tion on analytical limitations of data based on specific quality
control (QC) criteria. In order to provide more specific usabi-
lity statements, the reviewer must have a complete under-
standing of the intended use of the data. For this reason, it is
recommended that whenever possible the reviewer obtain
usability issues from the user prior to reviewing the data.
When this is not possible, the user should be encouraged to
communicate any questions to the reviewer.

Specifications: Paper copy avaitable on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 46p,

Subject index keywords: Inorganic compounds, Superfund,
Waste management. Land pollution, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response, Contract Laboratory Program.

PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION;
Removal Program Management

0998 Authorization for Regional Administrators to
Approve Consistency Exemptions at NPL Sites

Order Number PB92-963343CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 24 Feb 92
The purpose of the directive is to provide Regional Adminis-
trators with limited authority to approve exemptions from the
$2,000,000 statutory limit on CERCLA removal actions. This
authority is limited to consistency exemptions at proposed
and final National Priorities List (NPL) sites.

Subject index keywords: Authorizations, Administrative per-
sonnel, Hazardous materials, Directives, Superfund, National
Priorities List.

0999 Conducting Non-Time-Critical Removal Actions
under CERCLA

Order Number PB93-963422CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 93
The fact sheet summarizes a document entitled 'Guidance
on Conducting Non-Time-Critical Removal Actions Under
CERCLA' (Oswer Directive 9360.0-32), The guidance de-
scribes the essential components of the Non-Time-Critical
Removal Action Process with particular emphasis placed on
conducting the Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis (EE/
CA). The guidance is to be used in conjunction with EPA's
Emergency Response Division (ERD) Superfund Removal
Procedure (SRP) manual.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Cleanup, Superfund,

1000 Determination of Imminent and Substantial
Endangerment for Removal Actions

Order Number PB93-963416CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 19 Aug 93
The memorandum clarifies the process for making endanger-
ment determinations for removal actions pursuant to Delega-
tion of Authority 14-14-A under Section 106 of CERCLA.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $450). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 2p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Risk assessment,

1001 Emergency Responders Agreements for Fund-Lead
Remedial Actions

Order Number PB93-963418CDH, price: Standing Order, call
for price

Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 94
The Superfund program's contractors frequently rely on re-
sponders from the local community to provide emergency
support during remedial action. The fact sheet outlines rec-
ommended procedures to establish site specific agreements
with local emergency responders for fund-lead remedial
sites.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Superfund,
Emergency services, Lead(Metal), Remedial action.

1002 Exemptions from the Statutory Limits on Removal
Actions

Order Number PB91-921304CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 90
The Fact Sheet summarizes two exemptions from the statu-
tory time and dollar limits on removal actions provided for in
section 104(c) of CERCLA. The first is the 'emergency' ex-

186

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Removal Program

Management

emption for when a response action isimmediately required
to protect public health or welfare or the environment. The
second is the 'consistency' exemption for when further re-
sponse actions are appropriate and consistent
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 2p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Comprehensive Environmental Response Com-
pensation and Liability Act.

1003 Expedited Response Actions

Order Number PB93-963410CDH, price; PC AQ2/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Jul 86
The document summarizes response action procedures in an
attempt to clarify the distinction between expedited response
actions and remedial actions.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Expedited response action.

1004 Final Guidance on Implementation of the
'Consistency' Exemption to the Statutory Limits on
Removal Actions

Order Number PB90-274465CDH, price; PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 12 Jun 89
The directive provides final guidance to Regions on the im-
plementation of the SARA $2 million/12-month statutory
limits on removal actions and exemption from the statutory
limits for 'actions otherwise appropriate and consistent with
the remedial action to be taken' (consistency exemption).
Specifications: 8p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Guidelines,
Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Remedial action.

1005 Guidance on Conducting Non-Time-Critical Removal
Actions under CERCLA

Order Number PB93-963402CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Aug 93
The purpose of the guidance is to provide information on the
procedures and activities the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) uses in conducting non-time-critical removal
actions under the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and the National
Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan
(NCP). On-Scene Coordinators (OSCs) and Remedial Project
Managers (RPMs) should use this guidance to ensure that
non-time-critical removal actions are conducted in accord-
ance with applicable laws, regulations, and EPA policy. The
guidance focuses primarily on those aspects of the removal
process that are unique to non-time-critical removal actions.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,

and Mexico; all others $400), Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 67p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remediation, Risk as-
sessment.

1006 Guide to Removal Enforcement

Order Number PB92-963419CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 92
The fact sheet summarizes a Superfund Removal Proce-
dures volume entitled 'Removal Enforcement Guidance for
On-Scene Coordinators' describing the essential components
of the removal enforcement process along with recent
Agency enforcement initiatives stemming from the Manage-
ment Review of the Superfund Program (the *90-Day Study').
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB92-963409. 4p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

1007 Guidelines for the Cleanup of Clandestine Drug
Laboratories

Order Number PB90-272709CDH, price; PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response.; Drug Enforcement
Administration, Washington, DC.*"Coast Guard, Washington,
DC; Mar 90

The document provides guidelines proposed by the Joint
Task Force on illegal/clandestine drug laboratories to assist
State and local law enforcement and health agencies devel-
op a framework for cleaning up clandestine drug laboratories.
The guidelines contain an overview of recommended en-
forcement procedures, as well as safety guidelines and
cleanup strategies.

Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Drug Enforce-
ment Administration, Washington, DC., and Coast Guard,
Washington, DC. 46p.

Subject index keywords: Chemical laboratories, Drug indus-
try, Drugs, Manufacturing, Toxic substances, Occupational
safety and health.

1008 Policy on Management of Post-Removal Site Control
Order Number PB91-921326CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 3 Dec 90

The directive transmits the OSWER policy on management
of post-removal site control for Fund-financed removal activi-
ties and communicating decisions to States on the use of in-
stitutional controls. It provides procedures to ensure that,
when necessary and to the extent practicable, provision for
post-removal site control at both National Priorities List (NPL)
and non-NPL sites is made prior to initiation of a Fund-fi-
nanced removal action. Procedures are also provided for
communicating decisions to States on the use of institutional
controls when waste is left on-site following a removal
action.

187

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Removal Program
Management

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

1009 Removal Cost Management System: Version 3.2

Order Number PB90-272691CDH, price; PC A10/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 90
The user's guide for the Removal Cost Management System
(RCMS) is specifically designed to serve as a reference
manual for software used to perform cost projections and
daily cost tracking. The guide can also be used to create
Cost Projection reports, the 1900-55 Form, a Daily Cost
Summary, an Incident Obligation Log, and Site Summary Re-
ports.

Specifications: Also available from Supt. of Docs. See also
PB90-153891, 211 p.

Subject index keywords: Guidelines, Hazardous materials,
Superfund, Waste management, User manuals(Computer
programs).

1010 Removal Program Representative Sampling
Guidance. Volume 1. Soil

Order Number PB92-963408CDH, price; PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 91
This is the first volume in a series of guidance documents
that assist Removal Program On-Scene Coordinators and
other field staff in obtaining representative samples at re-
moval sites. The objective of representative sampling is to
ensure that a sample or a group of samples accurately char-
acterizes site conditions. The document specifically address-
es representative sampling for soil.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Soils, Re-
moval, Superfund, Representative sampling.

1011 Site-Specific Contracting for Removals

Order Number PB91-215053CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 10 Apr 89
The directive provides direction on the use of site-specific
contracting in as many removal actions as circumstances
allow and lists the criteria needed to do so.

Specifications: 6p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

1012 Superfund Removal Procedures: Action
Memorandum Guidance

Order Number PB90-274473CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
The directive provides guidance for Action Memorandum,
which are concise written records of the decisions selecting
removal actions, and the primary decision documents to
select and authorize such actions. The document is the first
volume of a ten-volume series of guidance documents col-
lectively titled the 'Superfund Removal Procedures.' These
stand-alone volumes update and replace OSWER Directive

9360.0-3B, the single-volume 'Superfund Removal Proce-
dures' manual issued in February 1988.

Specifications: 59p.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Guidelines,
Removal, Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, Remedial response. Re-
medial action.

1013 Superfund Removal Procedures: Guidance on the
Consideration of ARARS during Removal Actions

Order Number PB92-963401CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 91
The document is part of a ten-volume series of guidance
documents collectively titled the Superfund Removal Proce-
dures. The specific document presents information recom-
mendations, and examples to aid On Scene Coordinators in
identifying potential Federal and State ARARs, determining
the extent to which compliance with ARARs is practicable,
and documenting ARAR evaluations. The guidance also may
be used by potentially responsible parties (PRPs) when po-
tential ARARs are being assembled by the PRP.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 39p.

Subject index keywords: Removal, Hazardous materials,
Superfund.

1014 Superfund Removal Procedures: Public Participation
Guidance for On-Scene Coordinators: Community
Relations and the Administrative Record

Order Number PB92-963416CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 92
The document is part of a ten-volume series of guidance
documents collectively titled the Superfund Removal Proce-
dures. Each volume in the series is dedicated to a particular
aspect of the removal process. The document summarizes
the relevant public participation guidance and statutory au-
thorities for conducting community relations and administra-
tive record activities.

1015 Superfund Removal Procedures: Removal
Enforcement Guidance for On-Scene Coordinators

Order Number PB92-963409CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 92
The document is part of a ten-volume series of guidance
documents collectively titled the Superfund Removal Proce-
dures. These stand-alone volumes update and replace
OSWER Directive 9360.0-3B, the single-volume Superfund
Removal Procedures manual, issued in February 1988. Each
volume in the series is dedicated to a particular aspect of the
removal process and includes a volume-specific Table of
Contents, Reference List, and Key Words Index. The series
comprises the following nine procedural volumes. The docu-

188

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Risk Management

ment summarizes the relevant guidance and statutory au-
thorities for conducting enforcement activities during removal
actions.

1016 Use of Office of Research and Development's
Bioremediation Expertise in Superfund Removal
Program

Order Number PB90-249798CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 12 Mar 90
The directive establishes a formal mechanism for accessing
and using the Office of Research and Development's (ORD)
capabilities in the area of bioremediation of oil spills, hazard-
ous substance spills, and Superfund removal actions.
Specifications: 5p.

Subject index keywords: Regulations, Hazardous materials,
Microorganisms, Superfund, Oil spills, Remedial action, Bior-
emediation, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Risk

Management

1017 Achieving Greater Consistency between Subjective
and Objective Risks

Order Number PB90-229832CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park. Environmental
Resources Research Inst.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, DC. Office of Policy, Planning and Evaluation;
Nov 89

In the context of a hypothetical Superfund site (or aban-
doned hazardous waste facility), the research examines strat-
egies for achieving a closer match between risk estimates by
citizens and those by scientists. A stratefied sample was
interviewed to represent environmental groups, business,
civic activists, elected officials, and general population. Re-
spondents were given a scenario about contamination of
drinking water from the Superfund site. The scenarios varied
in that some included an uncertainty disclaimer. The other
variation was in terms of how much citizen participation
would be involved in decisions about remedial action, or
whether the state would purchase homes that could not be
sold at a price representing market value before discovery of
the site. Respondents were asked about their level of con-
cern, their perceived risk, and any actions they would take if
they lived near the hypothetical site.

Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Policy, Planning and Eval-
uation. 128p.

Subject index keywords: Risk, Water pollution, Hazardous
materials, Superfund program.

1018 ATSDR Health Consultations under CERCLA

Order Number PB93-963334CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 21 Nov 91
The memorandum clarifies issues related to Agency for Toxic
Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) health consulta-
tions requested under CERCLA by the Superfund removal,
remedial, and site assessment programs.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Risk assessment.

1019 ECO Update: Ecological Assessment of Superfund
Sites. An Overview. Volume 1, Number 2, December 1991

Order Number PB92-963335CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 91
The document is an updated framework for ecological as-
sessment in the Superfund Program. It offers a description of
ecological assessment components and a discussion of how
they fit into the Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study
process. ECO Updates are a series of Intermittent Bulletins
intended to facilitate ecological assessment of Superfund
sites. Individual bulletins may discuss either technical meth-
ods or the management of ecological assessments. These
bulletins serve as supplements to Risk Assessment Guid-
ance for Superfund Volume 2: Environmental Evaluation
Manual (9285.7-01).

Specifications: Please type 43B message. See also PB90-
155599. 10p.

Subject index keywords: Sites, Hazardous materials, Ecolo-
gy, Pollution control, Superfund.

1020 ECO Update: The Role of BTAGs In Ecological
Assessment. Volume 1, Number 1, September 1991

Order Number PB92-963337CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Most EPA Regions have established groups of scientists to
advise and assist site managers with ecological studies pro-
duced in conjunction with Remedial Investigations and Feasi-
bility Studies and Removal Actions at Superfund sites. In
general, these groups are known as Biological Technical As-
sistance Groups or BTAGs, although some regions use dif-
ferent names. The bulletin summarizes the BTAG structure
and function in the Superfund process. Its purpose is to help
site managers understand how BTAGs can assist with the
collection and evaluation of site information and ensure that
ecological effects are properly considered. ECO Updates are
a series of Intermittent Bulletins intended to facilitate ecologi-
cal assessment of Superfund sites. These bulletins serve as
supplements to Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund
Volume 2: Environmental Evaluation Manual (9285.7-01).
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB90-155599. 6p.

189

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Risk Management

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Sites, Ecolo-
gy, Pollution control, Superfund, Biological Technical Assist-
ance Groups.

1021 ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 3. The Role of
Natural Resource Trustees in the Superfund Process

Order Number PB92-963369CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 92
The bulletin is intended to help Remedial Project Managers
and On-Scene Coordinators work with natural resource trust-
ees during site assessment and remediation. It explains the
authority and responsibilities of trustees, and the responsibil-
ities of RPMs and OSCs with respect to trustee issues. The
goal of this document is to help reduce delays and ensure
compliance with relevant statutes by increasing understand-
ing of trustee issues as they pertain to the Superfund pro-
gram.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB92-963370.12p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Remedial action, Natural resource
trustees, Cleanup operations.

1022 ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 4. Developing a
Work Scope for Ecological Assessments

Order Number PB92-963370CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 92
The bulletin is intended for Remedial Project Managers
(RPMs), to help them plan and manage ecological assess-
ments of sites as part of the Remedial Investigation and Fea-
sibility Study (RI/FS) process. As used here, the generic
term work scope describes the process of specifying the
work to be done for the ecological assessment, as part of
the overall Rl Work Plan. The term encompasses project
scoping, development and approval of the Work Plan, and
preparation of the Statement of Work (SOW) for contractors
(at Fund-lead sites). The outcome of a successfully executed
work scope should be an ecological assessment that in-
cludes four essential components: problem formulation, ex-
posure assessment, ecological effects assessment, and risk
characterization.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB92-963369. 16p,
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Remedial action, Ecology, Cleanup op-
erations, Work scope.

1023 ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 5, August 1992.
Briefing the BTAG: Initial Description of Setting, History,
and Ecology of a Site

Order Number PB92-963374CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 92
The ECO Update is a bulletin series on ecological assess-
ment of Superfund sites. The issue highlights the Biological
Technical Assistance Groups (BTAGs) that assist Remedial
Project Managers in managing assessments of whether eco-
logical harm has occurred or may occur at a Superfund site.

Subject index keywords: Ecology, Hazardous materials, As-
sessments.

1024 Ecological Risk Assessment Methods: A Review and
Evaluation of Past Practices in the Superfund and RCRA
(Resource Conservation and Recovery Act) Programs
(Executive Summary included)

Order Number PB90-137324CDH, price: PC A10/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Policy, Planning and Evaluation; Jun 89
Substances released from sites subject to the Comprehen-
sive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act have
the potential to cause adverse effects to human health and
the environment. Although there are numerous examples of
adverse ecological impacts being caused by releases of haz-
ardous substances and wastes, programs have focused pri-
marily on identification, analysis, and mitigation of potential
adverse effects to human health. As a consequence of the
program emphasis, relatively little information is available
concerning the overall extent of ecological impacts at sites.
EPA/OPA initiated a study of the nature and extent of eco-
logical impacts at CERCLA and RCRA sites re. the methods
that have been or could be used to evaluate ecological im-
pacts at these sites, and past ecological risk management
decisions and issues at OSWER waste sites.

Specifications: 21 Op.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Ecology,
Public health.

1025 Ecological Risk Management in the Superfund and
RCRA (Resource Conservation and Recovery Act)
Programs

Order Number PB90-137332CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Policy, Planning and Evaluation; Jun 89
The report discusses the extent to which ecological concerns
have been used as a basis for decisionmaking in the
CERCLA and RCRA programs. For each program, the report
first identifies areas in which ecological impacts could be
considered, and then examines the manner and extent to
which ecological concerns have, in fact, been taken into ac-
count in program activities. The report concludes with discus-
sion of the major ecological risk management issues that
should be addressed by the Agency if ecological concerns
are to be fully considered in the RCRA/CERCLA decision-
making.

Specifications: 45p.

Subject index keywords: Ecology, Hazardous materials.

1026 Effect of OSHA's Bloodborne Pathogens Standard
on Hazardous Waste Cleanup Activities

Order Number PB93-963419CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Aug 93
Bloodborne pathogens are microorganisms that are present
in human blood and can cause disease in humans. These
pathogens include, but are not limited to, hepatitis B virus
(HBV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). In addition

190

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Risk Management

to healthcare workers, the standard also may affect workers
who handle waste potentially contaminated with blood or
other potentially infectious material during response actions
at uncontrolled hazardous waste sites. The purpose of the
Fact Sheet is to describe the additional planning, training,
and medical surveillance requirements that the new OSHA
standard on bloodborne pathogens imposes upon On-Scene
Coordinators (OSCs) and Remedial Project Managers
(RPMs) during a Superfund response action.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials. Occupation-
al exposure, Medical wastes, Superfund.

1027 Environmental Asbestos Assessment Manual.
Superfund Method for the Determination of Asbestos in
Ambient Air. Part 1. Method

Order Number PB90-274283CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 90

The report provides a sampling and analysis method for the
determination of asbestos in the air to provide results suita-
ble for supporting risk assessments at Superfund sites. Part
2 presents the technical background and considerations ad-
dressed during the development of the method.

Specifications: See also Part 2, PB90-274291. 121 p.
Subject Index keywords: Asbestos, Hazardous materials,
Air pollution, Superfund.

1028 Environmental Asbestos Assessment Manual.
Superfund Method for the Determination of Asbestos in
Ambient Air. Part 2. Technical Background Document

Order Number PB90-274291CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 90
The report provides a sampling and analysis method for the
determination of asbestos in the air to provide results suita-
ble for supporting risk assessments at Superfund sites. Part
1 presents the method to be used.

Specifications: See also Part 1, PB90-274283. 106p.
Subject index keywords: Asbestos, Hazardous materials,
Chemical analysis, Air pollution, Superfund.

1029 Guidance for Coordinating ATSDR Health
Assessment Activities with the Superfund Remedial
Process

Order Number PB91-214080CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 22 Apr 87
The directive discusses SARA which mandates that the
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR)
perform specific public health activities associated with
actual or potential exposure to toxic substances identified at
hazardous waste sites. The document (1) provides guidance
to support ATSDR in meeting its health assessment require-
ments as outlined in Section 110 under SARA; (2) summa-
rizes the various EPA response activities for which consulta-
tion with ATSDR may be requested; and (3) outlines
ATSDR's management process for citizen petitions.
Specifications: 24p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Toxic substances, Public health. Office
of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

1030 Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assessment

Order Number P391-921312CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
EPA is establishing national guidance for minimum data qual-
ity requirements to optimize the useability of data collected
under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Com-
pensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA). Data useabi-
lity is the process of assuring or determining that the quality
of data generated meets the intended use. The guidance is
designed to provide data users with a nationally-consistent
basis for making decisions about the minimum quality and
quantity of environmental analytical data that are sufficient to
support Superfund decisions, regardless of which parties
conduct the investigation. EPA workgroups are defining the
current uses and associated quality requirements of Super-
fund data, and developing minimum requirements for each
data use category. The fact sheet provides an overview of
Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assessment (EPA/540/
G-90/008), highlights key points of the manual, and details
where additional guidance is found.

Subject Index keywords: Public health, Hazardous materi-
als, Data acquisition, Management planning, Superfund, Risk
assessment.

1031 Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assessment

Order Number PB92-963363CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jun 92
The fact sheet provides an overview of Part A and Part B of
the Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assessment. It high-
lights key points of the documents and states where addi-
tional information can be found. The Guidance for Data
Useability in Risk Assessment provides risk assessors and
RPMs with nationally-consistent procedures to plan and
assess sampling and analysis of useable environmental data
for baseline human health risk assessments, and addresses
the useability of radioanalytical data for baseline human
health risk assessment.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

1032 Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assessment.
Interim Report

Order Number PB91-921208CDH, price: PC A12/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 90
The Environmental Protection Agency has established a
Data Useability Workgroup to develop national guidance for
minimum data quality requirements to increase the useability

191

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Risk Management

of environmental analytical data in the cleanup of hazardous
waste sites under the Comprehensive Environmental Re-
sponse, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1880 as amend-
ed in the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of
1986 (SARA). The guidance manual prvides direction for
planning and assessing analytical data collection activities for
the baseline human health risk assessment, conducted as
part of the remedial investigation (Rl) process. The guidance
does not address the use of environmental data for purposes
other than baseline risk asssessment for human health.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 272p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Public
health, Data acquisition, Management planning, Superfund,
Risk assessment.

1033 Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assessment
(Part A)

Order Number PB92-963356CDH, price: PC A13/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 92
The document is the first part (Part A) of the two-part Guid-
ance for Data Useability in Risk Assessment. The guidance
provides direction for planning and assessing analytical data
collection activities for the baseline human health risk as-
sessment, conducted as part of the remedial investigation
(Rl) process. It provides risk assesors and RPMs with nation-
ally-consistent procedures to plan and assess sampling and
analysis of useable environmental data. Although the guid-
ance addresses the baseline assessment within the Rl, it is
appropriate for use in the new Superfund Accelerated Clean-
up Model where data needs for risk assessment are consid-
ered at the onset of site evaluation.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Risk assessment, Haz-
ardous materials, Waste management, Public health.

1034 Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assessment
(Part B)

Order Number PB92-963362CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 92
Part B of Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assessment
provides supplemental information regarding the useability of
analytical data for performing a baseline risk assessment at
sites with radioactivity. While Part A focuses primarily on
chemical contamination, much of the information presented
also applies to the risk assessment process for radioactive
contamination. The guidance offered in Part B is intended as
an overview of the key differences between chemical and ra-
dionuclide risk assessments, and not as a comprehensive,
stand-alone document to assess the risks posed by radionu-
clide exposures. Part A of the guidance should be used side
by side with this document.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in

paper copy or microfiche. Supersedes PB91-921208. See
also PB92-063356. 85p.

Subject index keywords: Risk assessment, Radioactive
materials, Public health.

1035 Health Effects Assessment for Benzene

Order Number PB90-142381CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office; Aug 89
The report summarizes and evaluates information relevant to
a preliminary interim assessment of adverse health effects
associated with specific chemicals or compounds. The Office
of Emergency and Remedial Response (Superfund) uses
these documents in preparing cost-benefit analyses under
Executive Order 12991 for decision-making under CERCLA.
All estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency
presented in the document should be considered as prelimi-
nary and reflect limited resources allocated to the project.
The intent in the assessments is to suggest acceptable ex-
posure levels whenever sufficient data are available. The in-
terim values presented reflect the relative degree of hazard
associated with exposure or risk to the chemical(s) ad-
dressed. Whenever possible, two categories of values have
been estimated for systemic toxicants (toxicants for which
cancer is not the endpoint of concern). The first, RfDS or
subchronic reference dose, is an estimate of an exposure
level that would not be expected to cause adverse effects
when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
is an estimate of an exposure level that would not be expect-
ed to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a sig-
nificant portion of the lifespan.

Specifications: 67p.

Subject index keywords: Benzenes, Hazardous materials,
Industrial hygiene, Toxicology, Environmental surveys, Occu-
pational safety and health, Toxic substances, Environmental
health.

1036 Health Effects Assessment for Cadmium

Order Number PB90-142399CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office.; Syracuse
Research Corp., NY; Aug 88

The report summarizes and evaluates information relevant to
a preliminary interim assessment of adverse health effects
associated with specific chemicals or compounds. The Office
of Emergency and Remedial Response (Superfund) uses
these documents in preparing cost-benefit analyses under
Executive Order 12991 for decision-making under CERCLA.
All estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency
presented in the document should be considered as prelimi-
nary and reflect limited resources allocated to the project.
The intent in the assessments is to suggest acceptable ex-
posure levels whenever sufficient data are available. The in-
terim values presented reflect the relative degree of hazard
associated with exposure or risk to the chemical(s) ad-
dressed. Whenever possible, two categories of values have
been estimated for systemic toxicants (toxicants for which
cancer is not the endpoint of concern). The first, RfDS or
subchronic reference dose, is an estimate of an exposure
level that would not be expected to cause adverse effects
when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
is an estimate of an exposure level that would not be expect-

192

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Risk Management

od to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a sig-
nificant portion of the lifespan.

Specifications; Prepared in cooperation with Syracuse Re-
search Corp., NY. 6Gp.

Subject index keywords: Cadmium, Hazardous materials,
Industrial hygiene, Toxicology, Environmental surveys, Occu-
pational safety and health, Toxic substances, Environmental
health.

1037 Health Effects Assessment for Carbon Tetrachloride

Order Number PB9Q-142407CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office.; Syracuse
Research Corp., NY; Aug 89

The report summarizes and evaluates information relevant to
a preliminary interim assessment of adverse health effects
associated with specific chemicals or compounds. The Office
of Emergency and Remedial Response (Superfund) uses
these documents in preparing cost-benefit analyses under
Executive Order 12991 for decision-making under CERCLA.
Ail estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency
presented in the document should be considered as prelimi-
nary and reflect limited resources allocated to the project.
The Intent in the assessments is to suggest acceptable ex-
posure levels whenever sufficient data are available. The in-
terim values presented reflect tha relative degree of hazard
associated with exposure or risk to the chemical(s) ad-
dressed. Whenever possible, two categories of values have
been estimated for systemic toxicants (toxicants for which
cancer is not the endpoint of concern). The first, RfDS or
subchronic reference dose, is an estimate of an exposure
level that would not be expected to cause adverse effects
when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
is an estimate of an exposure level that would not be expect-
ed to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a sig-
nificant portion of the lifespan.

Specifications: Prepared In cooperation with Syracuse Re-
search Corp., NY. 54p.

Subject index keywords: Carbon tetrachloride, Hazardous
materials, Industrial hygiene, Toxicology, Environmental sur-
veys, Occupational safety and health, Toxic substances, En-
vironmental health.

1038 Health Effects Assessment for Chiordane

Order Number PB90-142415CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office.; Syracuse
Research Corp., NY; Jul 88

The report summarizes and evaluates information relevant to
a preliminary interim assessment of adverse health effects
associated with specific chemicals or compounds. The Office
of Emergency and Remedial Response (Superfund) uses
these documents in preparing cost-benefit analyses under
Executive Order 12991 for decision-making under CERCLA.
All estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency
presented in the document should be considered as prelimi-
nary and reflect limited resources allocated to the project.
The intent in the assessments is to suggest acceptable ex-
posure levels whenever sufficient data are available. The in-
terim values presented reflect the relative degree of hazard
associated with exposure or risk to the ehemieal(s) ad-
dressed. Whenever possible, two categories of values have
been estimated for systemic toxicants (toxicants for which
cancer is not the endpoint of concern). The first, RfDS or

subchronic reference dose, is an estimate of an exposure
level that would not be expected to cause adverse effects
when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
is an estimate of an exposure level that would not be expect-
ed to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a sig-
nificant portion of the lifespan.

Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Syracuse Re-
search Corp., NY. 44p.

Subject index keywords: Chiordane, Hazardous materials,
Industrial hygiene, Toxicology, Environmental surveys, Occu-
pational safety and health, Toxic substances, Environmental
health.

1039 Health Effects Assessment for Chlorobenzene

Order Number PB9G-142514CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office.; Syracuse
Research Corp., NY; Jan 89

The report summarizes and evaluates information relevant to
a preliminary interim assessment of adverse health effects
associated with specific chemicals or compounds. The Office
of Emergency and Remedial Response (Superfund) uses
these documents in preparing cost-benefit analyses under
Executive Order 12991 for decision-making under CERCLA.
All estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency
presented in the document should be considered as prelimi-
nary and reflect limited resources allocated to the project.
The intent in the assessments is to suggest acceptable ex-
posure levels whenever sufficient data are available. The in-
terim values presented reflect the relative degree of hazard
associated with exposure or risk to the chemical(s) ad-
dressed, Whenever possible, two categories of values have
been estimated for systemic toxicants (toxicants for which
cancer is not the endpoint of concern). The first, RfDS or
subchronic reference dose, is an estimate of an exposure
level that would not be expected to cause adverse effects
when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
is an estimate of an exposure level that would not be expect-
ed to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a sig-
nificant portion of the lifespan.

Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Syracuse Re-
search Corp., NY. 47p.

Subject index keywords: Chlorobenzenes, Hazardous ma-
terials, Industrial hygiene, Toxicology, Environmental surveys,
Occupational safety and health, Toxic substances, Environ-
mental health.

1040 Health Effects Assessment for Chloroform

Order Number PB90-142423CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office.; Syracuse
Research Corp., NY; Apr 88

193

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Risk Management

terim values presented reflect the relative degree of hazard
associated with exposure or risk to the chemieal(s) ad-
dressed. Whenever possible, two categories of values have
been estimated for systemic toxicants (toxicants for which
cancer is not the endpcint of concern). The first, RfDS or
subchronic reference dose, is an estimate of an exposure
level that would not be expected to cause adverse effects
when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
is an estimate of an exposure level that would not be expect-
ed to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a sig-
nificant portion of the lifespan.

Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Syracuse Re-
search Corp., NY. 48p.

Subject index keywords: Chloroform, Hazardous materials,
Industrial hygiene, Toxicology, Environmental surveys, Occu-
pational safety and health, Toxic substances, Environmental
health.

1041 Health Effects Assessment for DDT

Order Number PB90-142431CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office.; Syracuse
Research Corp., NY; Nov 88

Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Syracuse Re-
search Corp., NY. 58p.

Subject index keywords: DDT, Hazardous materials, Indus-
trial hygiene. Toxicology, Environmental surveys, Occupation-
al safety and health, Toxic substances, Environmental health.

1042 Health Effects Assessment for Methyl Ethyl Ketone

Order Number PB90-142456CDH, price: PC AQ3/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office.; Syracuse
Research Corp., NY; Feb 89

nary and reflect limited resources allocated to the project.
The intent in the assessments is to suggest acceptable ex-
posure levels whenever sufficient data are available. The in-
terim values presented reflect the relative degree of hazard
associated with exposure or risk to the chemical(s) ad-
dressed. Whenever possible, two categories of values have
been estimated for systemic toxicants (toxicants for which
cancer is not the endpoint of concern). The first, RfDS or
subchronic reference dose, is an estimate of an exposure
level that would not be expected to cause adverse effects
when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
is an estimate of an exposure level that would not be expect-
ed to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a sig-
nificant portion of the lifespan.

Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Syracuse Re-
search Corp., NY. 31 p.

Subject index keywords: Methyl ethyl ketone, Hazardous
materials, Industrial hygiene, Toxicology, Environmental sur-
veys, Occupational safety and health, Toxic substances, En-
vironmental health.

1043 Health Effects Assessment for Methylene Chloride

Order Number PB90-142449CDH, price: PC AQ4/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office.; Syracuse
Research Corp., NY; Aug 89

Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Syracuse Re-
search Corp., NY. 73p.

Subject index keywords: Chloromethanes, Hazardous ma-
terials, Industrial hygiene, Toxicology, Environmental surveys,
Occupational safety and health, Toxic substances, Environ-
mental health.

1044 Health Effects Assessment for Naphthalene

Order Number PB90-142464CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office.; Syracuse
Research Corp., NY; May 88

The report summarizes and evaluates information relevant to
a preliminary interim assessment of adverse health effects
associated with specific chemicals or compounds. The Office

194

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Risk Management

of Emergency and Remedial Response (Superfund) uses
these documents in preparing cost-benefit analyses under
Executive Order 12991 for decision-making under CERCLA.
All estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency
presented in the document should be considered as prelimi-
nary and reflect limited resources allocated to the project.
The intent in the assessments is to suggest acceptable ex-
posure levels whenever sufficient data are available. The in-
terim values presented reflect the relative degree of hazard
associated with exposure or risk to the chemical(s) ad-
dressed. Whenever possible, two categories of values have
been estimated for systemic toxicants (toxicants for which
cancer is not the endpoint of concern). The first, RfDS or
subchronic reference dose, is an estimate of an exposure
level that would not be expected to cause adverse effects
when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
is an estimate of an exposure level that would not be expect-
ed to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a sig-
nificant portion of the lifespan.

Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Syracuse Re-
search Corp., NY. 35p,

Subject index keywords; Naphthalene, Hazardous materi-
als, Industrial hygiene, Toxicology, Environmental surveys,
Occupational safety and health, Toxic substances, Environ-
mental health.

1045 Health Effects Assessment for Phenol

Order Number PB90-142472CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office.; Syracuse
Research Corp., NY; Jul 89

Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Syracuse Re-
search Corp., NY. 36p.

Subject index keywords: Phenols, Hazardous materials, In-
dustrial hygiene, Toxicology, Environmental surveys, Occupa-
tional safety and health, Toxic substances, Environmental
health.

1046 Health Effects Assessment for Styrene

Order Number PB90-142357CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office; Aug 89
The report summarizes and evaluates information relevant to
a preliminary interim assessment of adverse health effects
associated with specific chemicals or compounds. The Office
of Emergency and Remedial Response (Superfund) uses
these documents in preparing cost-benefit analyses under
Executive Order 12991 for decision-making under CERCLA.
All estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency
presented in the document should be considered as prelimi-
nary and reflect limited resources allocated to the project.
The intent in the assessments is to suggest acceptable ex-
posure levels whenever sufficient data are available. The in-
terim values presented reflect the relative degree of hazard
associated with exposure or risk to the chemical(s) ad-
dressed. Whenever possible, two categories of values have
been estimated for systemic toxicants (toxicants for which
cancer is not the endpoint of concern). The first, RfDS or
subchronic reference dose, is an estimate of an exposure
level that would not be expected to cause adverse effects
when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
is an estimate of an exposure level that would not be expect-
ed to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a sig-
nificant portion of the lifespan.

Specifications: 70p.

Subject index keywords: Styrene, Hazardous materials, In-
dustrial hygiene, Toxicology, Environmental surveys, Occupa-
tional safety and health, Toxic substances, Environmental
health.

1047 Health Effects Assessment for Tetrachloroethylene

Order Number PB90-142480CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office.; Syracuse
Research Corp., NY; Feb 88

The report summarizes and evaluates information relevant to
a preliminary interim assessment of adverse health effects
associated with specific chemicals or compounds. The Office
of Emergency and Remedial Response (Superfund) uses
these documents in preparing cost-benefit analyses under
Executive Order 12991 for decision-making under CERCLA.
All estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency
presented in the document should be considered as prelimi-
nary and reflect limited resources allocated to the project
The intent in the assessments is to suggest acceptable ex-
posure levels whenever sufficient data are available. The in-
terim values presented reflect the relative degree of hazard
associated with exposure or risk to the chemical(s) ad-
dressed, Whenever possible, two categories of values have
been estimated for systemic toxicants (toxicants for which
cancer is not the endpoint of concern). The first, RfDS or
subchronic reference dose, is an estimate of an exposure
level that would not be expected to cause adverse effects
when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
is an estimate of an exposure level that would not be expect-
ed to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a sig-
nificant portion of the lifespan.

Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Syracuse Re-
search Corp., NY. 61 p.

Subject index keywords: Tetrachloroethylene, Hazardous
materials, Industrial hygiene, Toxicology, Environmental sur-

195

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Risk Management

veys, Occupational safety and health, Toxic substances, En-
vironmental health.

1048 Health Effects Assessment for Trichloroethylene

Order Number PB90-142498CDH, price; PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office.; Syracuse
Research Corp, NY; Feb 88

The report summarizes and evaluates information relevant to
a preliminary interim assessment of adverse health effects
associated with specific chemicals or compounds. The Office
of Emergency and Remedial Response (Superfund) uses
these documents in preparing cost-benefit analyses under
Executive Order 12991 for decision-making under CERCLA.
All estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency
presented in the document should be considered as prelimi-
nary and reflect limited resources allocated to the project
The Intent in the assessments is to suggest acceptable ex-
posure levels whenever sufficient data are available. The in-
terim values presented reflect the relative degree of hazard
associated with exposure or risk to the chemical(s) ad-
dressed. Whenever possible, two categories of values have
been estimated for systemic toxicants (toxicants for which
cancer is not the endpoint of concern). The first, RfDS or
subchronic reference dose, is an estimate of an exposure
level that would not be expected to cause adverse effects
when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
is an estimate of an exposure level that would not be expect-
ed to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a sig-
nificant portion of the lifespan.

Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Syracuse Re-
search Corp., NY. 77p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Industrial
hygiene, Toxicology, Environmental surveys, Occupational
safety and health, Toxic substances, Environmental health,
Trichloroethylene.

1049 Health Effects Assessment for Xylenes

Order Number PB90-142506CDH, price: PC AG4/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office.; Syracuse
Research Corp, NY; Aug 89

Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Syracuse Re-
search Corp., NY. 52p.

Subject index keywords: Xylenes, Hazardous materials, In-
dustrial hygiene, Toxicology, Environmental surveys, Occupa-
tional safety and health, Toxic substances, Environmental
health.

1050 Health Effects Assessment for 2,4,5-
Trichlorophenoxy Acetic Acid (2,4,5-T)

Order Number PB90-142365CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office; Aug 89
The report summarizes and evaluates information relevant to
a preliminary interim assessment of adverse health effects
associated with specific chemicals or compounds. The Office
of Emergency and Remedial Response (Superfund) uses
these documents in preparing cost-benefit analyses under
Executive Order 12991 for decision-making under CERCLA.
All estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency
presented in the document should be considered as prelimi-
nary and reflect limited resources allocated to the project.
The intent in the assessments is to suggest acceptable ex-
posure levels whenever sufficient data are available. The in-
terim values presented reflect the relative degree of hazard
associated with exposure or risk to the chemicai(s) ad-
dressed. Whenever possible, two categories of values have
been estimated for systemic toxicants (toxicants for which
cancer is not the endpoint of concern). The first, RfDS or
subchronic reference dose, is an estimate of an exposure
level that would not be expected to cause adverse effects
when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
is an estimate of an exposure level that would not be expect-
ed to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a sig-
nificant portion of the lifespan.

Specifications: 49p,

Subject index keywords: Acetic acid, Hazardous materials,
Industrial hygiene, Toxicology, Environmental surveys, Occu-
pational safety and health, Toxic substances. Environmental
health.

1051 Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables

Order Number PB92-921100CDH, price; Standing Order, call
for price

Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; 1992
The document is an excellent 'pointer' system to identify cur-
rent literature or changes in assessment criteria for many
chemicals of interest to Superfund. It was prepared for Su-
perfund use by the Environmental Criteria and Assessment
Office (ECAO- Cin) in EPA's Office of Health and Environ-
mental Assessment. Chemicals considered are those for
which Health Effects Assessment Documents, Health and
Environmental Effects Profiles, Health Assessment Docu-
ments or Air Quality Criteria Documents have been prepared
by ECAO. Radionuclides considered are those believed to be
most common at Superfund sites. Tables summarize refer-
ence doses (RfDs) for toxicity from subchronic and chronic
inhalation, oral exposure, slope factors and unit risk values
for carcinogenicity based on lifetime inhalation and oral ex-
posure, and radionuclide carcinogenicity.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, De-
posit Account required (Minimum deposit $100 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $200). Single copies also available.

196

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Risk Management

Issued and superseded quarterly. Supersedes PB91-921100 .
4 issues.

Subject index keywords; Public health, Hazardous materi-
als, Radioactive wastes, Chemical compounds, Superfund
program, Environmental impact assessments, Biological ef-
fects, Health hazards.

1052 Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables

Order Number PB93-921100CDH, price: Standing Order, call
for price

Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; 1993
The document is an excellent 'pointer' system to identify cur-
rent literature or changes in assessment criteria for many
chemicals of interest to Superfund. It was prepared for Su-
perfund use by the Environmental Criteria and Assessment
Office (ECAO- Cin) in EPA's Office of Health and Environ-
mental Assessment. Chemicals considered are those for
which Health Effects Assessment Documents, Health and
Environmental Effects Profiles, Health Assessment Docu-
ments or Air Quality Criteria Documents have been prepared
by ECAO. Radionuclides considered are those believed to be
most common at Superfund sites. Tables summarize refer-
ence doses (RIDs) for toxicity from subchronic and chronic
inhalation, oral exposure, slope factors and unit risk values
for carcinogenicity based on lifetime inhalation and oral ex-
posure, and radionuclide carcinogenicity.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, De-
posit Account required (Minimum deposit $100 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $200). Single copies also available.
Issued and superseded quarterly. Supersedes PB92-921100 .
4 issues.

Subject index keywords; Public health, Hazardous materi-
als, Radioactive wastes, Chemical compounds, Superfund
program, Environmental impact assessments, Biological ef-
fects, Health hazards.

1053 Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables

Order Number PB94-921100CDH, price: Standing Order, call
for price

Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; 1994
The document is an excellent 'pointer' system to identify cur-
rent literature or changes in assessment criteria for many
chemicals of interest to Superfund. It was prepared for Su-
perfund use by the Environmental Criteria and Assessment
Office (ECAO- Cin) in EPA's Office of Health and Environ-
mental Assessment. Chemicals considered are those for
which Health Effects Assessment Documents, Hea.th and
Environmental Effects Profiles, Health Assessment Docu-
ments or Air Quality Criteria Documents have been prepared
by ECAO. Radionuclides considered are those believed to be
most common at Superfund sites. Tables summarize refer-
ence doses (RfDs) for toxicity from subchronic and chronic
inhalation, oral exposure, slope factors and unit risk values
for carcinogenicity based on lifetime inhalation and oral ex-
posure, and radionuclide carcinogenicity.

Specifications; Paper copy available on Standing Order, De-
posit Account required (Minimum deposit $100 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $200). Single copies also available.
Issued and superseded quarterly. Supersedes PB93-921100 .
4 issues.

Subject index keywords: Public health, Hazardous materi-
als, Radioactive wastes, Chemical compounds, Superfund
program, Environmental impact assessments, Biological ef-
fects, Health hazards.

1054 Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables Fourth
Quarter FY 1989

Order Number PB90-921100CDH, price: Standing Order, call
for price

Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Oct 89
The document is an excellent 'pointer' system to identify cur-
rent literature or changes in assessment criteria for many
chemicals of interest to Superfund. It was prepared for Su-
perfund use by the Environmental Criteria and Assessment
Office (ECAO- Cin) in EPA's Office of Health and Environ-
mental Assessment. Chemicals considered are those for
which Health Effects Assessment Documents, Health and
Environmental Effects Profiles, Health Assessment Docu-
ments or Air Quality Criteria Documents have been prepared
by ECAO. Radionuclides considered are those believed to be
most common at Superfund sites. Tables summarize refer-
ence doses (RfDs) for toxicity from subchronic and chronic
inhalation, oral exposure, slope factors and unit risk values
for carcinogenicity based on lifetime inhalation and oral ex-
posure, and radionuclide carcinogenicity.

Specifications; Paper copy available on Standing Order, De-
posit Account required (Minimum deposit $100 North Ameri-
can Continent; ail others $200). Single copies also available.
Issued and superseded quarterly. 1p.

Subject index keywords: Public health, Hazardous materi-
als, Radioactive wastes, Chemical compounds, Superfund
program, Environmental impact assessments, Biological ef-
fects, Health hazards.

1055 Identification of SARA (Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act) Compounds in Adipose Tissue

Order Number PB90-132564CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Midwest Research Inst., Kansas City, MO.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Toxic
Substances; 31 Aug 89

The National Human Adipose Tissue Survey (NHATS), ad-
ministered by EPA/OTS, is an on-going chemical monitoring
network designed to detect levels and prevalences of toxic
substances in the adipose tissue of the general U.S. popula-
tion. Adipose specimens collected in fiscal year 1982 were
analyzed as composites for volatile and semivolatile organic
compounds via HRGC/MS as part of a previous effort. The
data files were then processed to determine the occurrence
of compounds selected from the Superfund Amendments
and Reauthorization Act (SARA) Title III Toxic Chemical List-
ing, and from the SARA Section 110 CERCLA listing of 100
hazardous substances. A total of 61 volatile and 120 semivo-
latile target compounds were selected for analysis from the
listings based on their predicted suitability to the analytical
method. Application of target compound analysis (TCA) to 46
composited adipose tissue samples resulted in the identifica-
tion of 13 volatile and 19 semivolatile compounds. Frequency
of occurrence data was compiled with respect to three age
groups, four census regions and nine census divisions.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Toxic Substances. 139p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund program, Hazardous
substances, Adipose tissue.

197

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Risk Management

1056 Implementing the Deputy Administrator's Risk
Characterization Memorandum

Order Number PB93-963317CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 26 May 92
The directive implements the Superfund program recommen-
dations of the Deputy Administrator, dated February 26,1992
Guidance on Risk Characterization for Risk Managers and
Risk Assessors,

Subject index keywords: Waste management, Superfund,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

1057 fnterim Guidance for Soil Ingestion Rates

Order Number PB91-139709CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 27 Jan 89
The directive provides guidance to the Regions on soil inges-
tion rate assumptions recommended for use in developing
exposure scenarios for Superfund-lead and enforcement-lead
site risk assessments. The purpose of the guidance is to en-
hance consistency among Regional risk assessments and
recommend an ingestion rate for soil Initiated by Headquar-
ters. The directive supersedes 'Superfund Public Health Eval-
uation Manual,' directive no. 9285.4-01 dated October 1986,
only with reference to soil ingestion rates.

Specifications: See also PB87-183125. 7p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

1058 Limited-Use Chemical Protective Clothing for EPA
Superfund Activities

Order Number PB92-143494CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Little (Arthur D.), Inc., Cambridge, MA. New York State Coll.
of Human Ecology, Ithaca. Dept. of Design and
Environmental Science.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; Feb 92
Because contractor field personnel complained about the
poor durability and fit of limited-use chemical protective
clothing (CPC) most commonly used at hazardous waste site
operations, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
initiated a study to: characterize use of CPC; determine prob-
lems, and communicate results in publications and procure-
ment guidelines. Personnel at two Superfund hazardous
waste sites were surveyed about CPC problems. Poor fit of
coveralls and lack of fabric durability resulted in garment fail-
ures, especially in the seat, crotch, and underarms. Some
fabrics were identified that provided improved performance.
The commercial market was surveyed, and commercial fab-
rics for limited-use CPC were identified and obtained. Avail-
able standards and specifications describing size and fit pa-
rameters for limited-use CPC were identified and reviewed
relative to EPA Superfund CPC needs. None of the stand-
ards were found to be fully acceptable. American National
Standards Institute (ANSI) Standard 101-1985, however, pro-
vided a satisfactory baseline for further standards develop-
ment. Problems with CPC were analyzed and suggested
changes to ANSI 101 were developed as a proposed pro-
curement guideline. The information was presented to the In-

dustrial Safety Equipment Association, which developed the
ANSI standard.

Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with New York
State Coil, of Human Ecology, Ithaca. Dept. of Design and
Environmental Science, Sponsored by Environmental Protec-
tion Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
46p.

Subject index keywords: Protective clothing, Superfund,
Chemical compounds, Hazardous materials, Occupational
safety and protection, Waste disposal.

1059 Meeting Summary. National Advisory Council on
Environmental Policy and Technology (1st).
Subcommittee on Radiation Cleanup Regulation. Held In
Washington, DC. on October 18-19, 1993

Order Number PB94-136678CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Radiation and Indoor Air; Jan 94

The National Advisory Council for Environmental Policy and
Technology (NACEPT) Subcommittee on Radiation Cleanup
Regulations is a committee chartered under the Federal Ad-
visory Committee Act to provide advice and counsel to the
Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
on issues associated with the management of environmental
problems. NACEPT initiated this Subcommittee to advise
EPA on the development of a Radiation Cleanup Regulation.
The purpose of the meeting was to convene the NACEPT
Subcommittee, discuss the radiation cleanup regulation rule
making and the Subcommittee's work, provide background
briefings on key issues, and discuss and offer comment to
EPA on those issues. The three key issues EPA is currently
exploring as they begin the development of a draft rule on
radiation cleanup regulations are: questions about cleanup
levels/risk levels; future land use/state and local statutes;
and site-specific public involvement.

Specifications: See also PB94-112349. 79p,

Subject index keywords: Radioactive waste management,
Meetings, Pollution regulations.

1060 Nature and Extent of Ecological Risks at Superfund
Sites and RCRA (Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act) Facilities (Executive Summary Included)

Order Number PB90-137316CDH, price; PC A10/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Policy, Planning and Evaluation; Jun 89
The Office of Policy Analysis within EPA has been conduct-
ing a study of the ecological risks posed by Superfund Sites
and RCRA Facilities. In June 1989, OPA completed the first
phase of the study and the report presents the results of
OPA's efforts to characterize the nature and extent of eco-
logical risks at Superfund sites and RCRA facilities. The
report is divided into two main parts; Part I addresses Super-
fund sites and Part II addresses RCRA facilities.
Specifications: 219p.

Subject index keywords: Ecology, Hazardous materials,
Risk.

198

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Risk Management

1061 New Policy on Performance of Bisk Assessments
during Remedial Investigation Feasibility Studies (RI/FS)
Conducted by Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs)

Order Number PB93-963620CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1 Sep 93
The memorandum announces EPA's new policy on conduct-
ing risk assessments at Superfund sites where potentially re-
sponsible parties (PRPs) are conducting the remedial investi-
gation/feasibility studies (RI/FS) and the Agency's reasons
for adopting the policy.

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Risk assessment, Haz-
ardous materials.

1062 OSWER Comparative Risk Project. Executive
Summary and Overview

Order Number PB90-272501CDH, price: PC AG4/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 89
The document discusses the study undertaken by the Office
of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER) to ex-
plore the comparative risks posed by various waste manage-
ment practices regulated by and/or under OSWER purview.
It describes the study's position as an early step in the larger
strategic planning process, undertaken to gain experience in
performing comparative analysis.

Specifications: 72p.

Subject index keywords: Project management, Research
projects, Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Risk assessment.

1063 Quantifying Effects in Ecological Site Assessments:
Biological and Statistical Considerations

Order Number PB91-129189CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Corvallis Environmental Research Lab., OR.; NSI Technology
Services Corp., Corvallis, OR; 1990
The United States Environmental Protection Agency is re-
sponsible for developing methods to control potentially harm-
ful chemicals entering the environment. The determination of
harm is often based on laboratory toxicity tests of chemicals
using plants and animals. The vast number of toxicity tests of
single chemicals that have been produced to date provide an
extensive data base to help determine potential harm of
chemicals to humans and the environment. At Corvallis, the
authors have been working on various toxicity test methods
and on site characterization/assessment methods for some
time. Slightly more than two years ago, ERL-Corvallis began
to address ways of integrating methods to achieve meaning-
ful ecological assessments of hazardous waste sites. Exam-
ples of research activities in Corvallis are presented.
Specifications: Presented at OPPE Workshop on Statistical
Issues for Superfund, Crystal City, VA„ February 1990. Pre-
pared in cooperation with NSI Technology Services Corp.,
Corvallis, OR. 31 p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Toxicity, Meetings, Superfund,

1064 Recent Advances in Risk Reduction Engineering

Order Number PB90-129339CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; 1989

Contemporary environmental legislation such as the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act of 1980 and the Superfund Amendment and Reau-
thorization Act of 1986 emphasize the reduction of risk of
damage to the environment and human health as the basis
of environmental management. There is a hierarchy of ap-
proaches to risk reduction including source control, reuse
and recycle, treatment and exposure minimization. Recent
examples of these approaches, which were evaluated by the
Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory, are presented in-
cluding: Superfund innovative technology demonstrations,
waste reduction techniques, protective clothing and an
expert system to assess risk.

Specifications: Presented at Pan Pacific Cooperative Sym-
posium (1st), on Industrialization and Emerging Environmen-
tal Health Issues, Kitakyushu, Japan, October 2-6, 1989. 14p.
Subject index keywords: Public health, Hazardous materi-
als, Risk assessment, Environment management, Waste
management.

1065 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. Volume
1. Human Health Evaluation Manual. Part A

Order Number PB90-155581CDH, price: PC A13/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 89
The document is part of a two-manual set entitled 'Risk As-
sessment Guidance for Superfund,' One manual, the 'Envi-
ronmental Evaluation Manual,' provides guidance for ecologi-
cal assessment at Superfund sites; the other, the 'Human
Health Evaluation Manual,' provides guidance for health risk
assessment of these sites. The 'Risk Assessment Guidance
for Superfund' manuals were developed to be used during
the Removal and Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study
(RI/FS) processes at Superfund sites. The analytical frame-
work and specific methods described in the manuals, howev-
er, may also be applicable to evaluations of hazardous
wastes and hazardous materials for other purposes. The two
manuals in the set have somewhat different target audi-
ences. The 'Environmental Evaluation Manual' primarily ad-
dresses Remedial Project Managers (RPMs and On-Scene
Coordinators (OSCs)), who are responsible for ensuring a
thorough evaluation of potential environmental effects at
sites. The 'Human Health Evaluation Manual' provides for
the risk assessor - Updated procedures and policies, specific
equations and variable values for estimating exposure, and a
hierarchy of toxicity data sources.

Specifications: See also Volume 2, PB90-155599. 290p.
Subject index keywords: Toxicology, Risk assessment, Su-
perfund program.

1066 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. Volume
1. Human Health Evaluation Manual. Part A, April 1990

Order Number PB90-273830CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 90
The fact sheet designed to alert RPMs and other personnel
to (1) new aspects of the Human Health Evaluation Manual
(Part A), (2) the purpose and steps of the baseline risk as-
sessment, and (3) where additional help can be obtained.

199

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Risk Management

Specifications: See also PB9Q-155581. 9p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Public
health, Guidelines, Superfund, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Waste management, Risk assess-
ment.

1067 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. Volume
1. Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part B)

Order Number PB92-963339CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 91
EPA's Human Health Evaluation Manual, which describes the
process of gathering information and assessing the risk to
human health, and the Environment Evaluation Manual com-
prise a two-volume set called Risk Assessment Guidance for
Superfund (RAGS). The HHEM has three main parts: Part A,
which discusses the baseline risk assessment, Part B, Devel-
opment of Risk-based Preliminary Remediation Goals, and
Part C, Risk Evaluation of Remedial Alternatives. The fact
sheet is designed to introduce remedial project managers
and other personnel to the information that is available in
RAGS/HHEM Part B on developing risk-based preliminary
remediation goals for chemicals of concern at CERCLA sites.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 7p.

Subject index keywords: Toxicity, Hazardous materials,
Public health, Pollution control, Superfund, Remediation
goals.

1068 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. Volume
1. Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part B, Development
of Risk-Based Preliminary Remediation Goals)

Order Number PB92-963333CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 91
The document is one of a three-part series. Part B provides
guidance on using USEPA toxicity values and exposure infor-
mation to derive risk-based preliminary remedial goals (PRG)
for a CERCLA site. Initially developed at the scoping phase
using readily available information, risk-based PRGs general-
ly are modified based on site-specific data gathered during
the remedial investigation/feasibility study. The guidance
does not discuss the risk management decisions that are
necessary at a CERCLA site. The potential users of Part B
are those involved in the remedy selection and implementa-
tion process, including risk assessors, risk assessment re-
viewers, remedial project managers, and other decision-
makers.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB92-963334. 66p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Public
health, Pollution control, Superfund.

1069 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. Volume
1. Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part C)

Order Number PB92-963340CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 91
EPA's Human Health Evaluation Manual, which describes the
process of gathering information and assessing the risk to

human health, and the Environment Evaluation Manual com-
prise a two-volume set called Risk Assessment Guidance for
Superfund (RAGS). The HHEM has three main parts: Part A,
which discusses the baseline risk assessment, Part B, Devel-
opment of Risk-based Preliminary Remediation Goals, and
Part C, Risk Evaluation of Remedial Alternatives. The fact
sheet is designed to introduce remedial project managers
and other personnel to the information that is available in
RAGS/HHEM Part C on using human health risk information
to evaluate remedial alternatives.

Subject index keywords: Toxicity, Hazardous materials,
Public health, Pollution control, Superfund, Risk assessment.

1070 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. Volume
1. Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part C, Risk
Evaluation of Remedial Alternatives)

Order Number PB92-963334CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 91
The document is one of a three-part series. Part C provides
guidance on the human health risk evaluations of remedial
alternatives that are conducted during the feasibility study,
during selection and documentations of a remedy, and during
and after remedy implementation. Part C provides general
guidance to assist in site-specific risk evaluations and to
maintain flexibility in the analysis and decision-making proc-
ess. The potential users of Part C are persons involved in
the remedy selection and implementation process, including
risk assessors, risk assessment reviewers, remedial project
managers, and other decision-makers.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB92-963333. 77p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Public
health, Pollution control, Superfund.

1071 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. Volume
1. Human Health Evaluation Manual. Supplemental
Guidance: 'Standard Default Exposure Factors'

Order Number PB91-921314CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 25 Mar 91
The document supplements the Risk Assessment Guidance
for Superfund (RAGS): Human Health Evaluation Manual,
Part A. Where exposure factors presented in the guidance
differ from those in Part A, the values found in the guidance
supersede those in Part A. The guidance was developed to
encourage a consistent approach to characterizing potential
human exposures at Superfund sites. The exposure factors
presented in the document are generally considered most
appropriate for estimating Reasonable Maximum Exposures
(RME), and should be used in baseline risk assessments
unless alternate or site-specific values can be clearly justified
by supporting data.

200

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Risk Management

Subject index keywords: Public health, Humans, Exposure,
Hazardous materials, Superfund, Risk assessment,

1072 Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. Volume
2. Environmental Evaluation Manual

Order Number PB90-155599CDH, price; PC A04/MF A01
Environmentai Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 89
The document is part of a two-manual set entitled 'Risk As-
sessment Guidance for Superfund.' One manual, the 'Envi-
ronmental Evaluation Manual," provides guidance for ecologi-
cal assessment at Superfund sites; the other, the 'Human
Health Evaluation Manual,' provides guidance for health risk
assessment of these sites. The 'Risk Assessment Guidance
for Superfund' manuals were developed to be used during
the Removal and Remedial investigation/Feasibility Study
(Ri/FS) processes at Superfund sites. The analytical frame-
work and specific methods described in the manuals, howev-
er, may also be applicable to evaluations of hazardous
wastes and hazardous materials for other purposes. The two
manuals in the set have somewhat different target audi-
ences. The 'Environmental Evaluation Manual' primarily ad-
dresses Remedial Project Managers (RPMs) and On-Scene
Coordinators (OSCs)), who are responsible for ensuring a
thorough evaluation of potential environmental effects at
sites. The 'Environmental Evaluation Manual' is not a de-
tailed 'how-to' type of guidance, and it does not provide
'cookbook' approaches for evaluation.

Specifications: See also Volume 1, PB9Q-155581. 63p.
Subject index keywords: Ecology, Superfund program, Risk
assessment,

1073 Risk Assessment in Superfund: A Primer. First
Edition, September 1990

Order Number PB91-214197CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 91
The document is an introduction to risk assessment for Su-
perfund Remedial Project Managers (RPMs) and On-Scene
Coordinators (OSCs). This is an internal training document.
Specifications: 87p,

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Risk assessment, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response.

1074 Role of Health Research in Support of EPA's
Regulatory Programs

Order Number PB91-211912CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Eastern Research Group, Inc., Arlington, MA.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Health
Research; Jun 90

The document highlights the ongoing role of environmental
health research in support of the Environmental Protection
Agency's regulatory programs, ft summarizes the key legisla-
tion, emphasizing the uses of health research, and identifies
the most important research needs for each program office.
The document shows the key role played by environmental
health research in EPA's regulatory activities and points out
that certain research needs are common across all the pro-
grams.

Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Health Research. 104p.
Subject index keywords: Health risk, Environmental re-
search, Pollution regulations, Public health.

1075 Role of the Baseline Risk Assessment in Superfund
Remedy Selection Decisions

Order Number PB91-921359CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 91
The objective of the memorandum is to provide further guid-
ance on how to use the baseline risk assessment to make
risk management decisions such as determining whether re-
medial action under CERCLA Sections 104 or 106 is neces-
sary. The memorandum also clarifies the use of the base line
risk assessment in selecting appropriate remedies under
CERCLA Section 121, promotes consistency in preparing
site-specific risk assessments, and helps ensure that appro-
priate documentation from the baseline risk assessment is in-
cluded in Superfund remedy selection documents.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 11 p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Risk assess-
ment, Superfund.

1076 Site Assessment: Evaluating Risks at Superfund
Sites

Order Number PB93-963347CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmentai Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
The report includes an overview of the site assessment proc-
ess within the Superfund program and answers commonly
asked questions.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Pollution control.

1077 Summary of Ecological Risks, Assessment Methods,
and Risk Management Decisions in Superfund and RCRA
(Resource Conservation and Recovery Act)

Order Number PB90-137340CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Policy, Planning and Evaluation; Jun 89
In developing and implementing programs under the Com-
prehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Li-
ability Act (CERCLA), EPA has focused primarily on analysis
and mitigation of human health risks and less emphasis has
been placed on analysis and mitigation of ecological threats
at Superfund sites. As an initial step in Investigating issues
related to ecological threats at Superfund sites, EPA's Office
of Policy Analysis has conducted a study of three broad
topics: (1) the nature and extent of ecological threats at Su-
perfund sites; (2) tie ecological assessment methods that
have been used in the Superfund program: and (3) the
extent to which ecological concerns have been used as a
basis for decision making at Superfund sites.

Specifications: 45p.

Subject index keywords: Ecology, Hazardous materials,
Public health.

201

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: RI/FS & RODS
Process

1078 Supplemental Guidance on Performing Risk
Assessments in Remedial Investigation/Feasibility
Studies (RI/FSs). Conducted by Potentially Responsible
Parties (PRPs)

Order Number PB91-205526CDH, price: PC A08/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 1991
The purpose of the directive is to provide additional guidance
on implementing the policy that EPA will not enter into settle-
ment agreements under which PRPs perform the risk assess-
ment components of the RI/FS, as discussed by the Agency
in OSWER Directive No, 9835.15 (August 28, 1990). The
memorandum provides guidance on coordinating the site
characterization tasks and feasibility study prepared by the
PRP with the baseline risk assessment performed by EPA.
Specifications; 102p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Risk assessment, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response, Potentially responsible parties.

1079 Supplemental Guidance to RAGS: Calculating the
Concentration Term. Volume 1, Number 1, May 19S2

Order Number PB92-963373CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remediat Response; May 92
The bulletin explains the concentration term in the exposure/
intake equation to remedial project managers, risk assessors,
statisticians, and other personnel. This bulletin presents the
general intake equation as presented in RAGS/HHEM Part
A, discusses basic concepts concerning the concentration
term, describes generally how to calculate the concentration
term, presents examples to illustrate several important
points, and identifies where to get additional help.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. I0p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Environmental health, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, Risk Assessment Guid-
ance for Superfund.

1080 Updated Health Effects Assessment for Acetone

Order Number P390-142373CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office.; Syracuse
Research Corp., NY; Apr 88

The report summarizes and evaluates information relevant to
a preliminary interim assessment of adverse health effects
associated with specific chemicals or compounds. The Office
of Emergency and Remedial Response (Superfund) uses
these documents in preparing cost-benefit analyses under
Executive Order 12991 for decision-making under CERCLA.
All estimates of acceptable intakes and carcinogenic potency
presented in the document should be considered as prelimi-
nary and reflect limited resources allocated to the project.
The intent In the assessments is to suggest acceptable ex-
posure levels whenever sufficient data are available. The in-
terim values presented reflect the relative degree of hazard
associated with exposure or risk to the chemical(s) ad-
dressed. Whenever possible, two categories of values have
been estimated for systemic toxicants (toxicants for which
cancer is not the endpoint of concern). The first, RfDS or
subchronic reference dose, is an estimate of an exposure

level that would not be expected to cause adverse effects
when exposure occurs during a limited time interval. The RfD
is an estimate of an exposure level that would not be expect-
ed to cause adverse effects when exposure occurs for a sig-
nificant portion of the lifespan.

Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Syracuse Re-
search Corp., NY. 32p.

Subject index keywords: Acetone, Hazardous materials, In-
dustrial hygiene, Toxicology, Environmental surveys, Occupa-
tional safety and health, Toxic substances, Environmental
health.

1081 Use of IRIS Values In Superfund Risk Assessment

Order Number PB93-963360CDH, price: PC AG1/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 21 Dec 93
The memorandum clarifies the policy stated at section 7.4.1
of the December 1988 Risk Assessment Guidance for Super-
fund (Volume I) Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part A)
(RAGS) on the use of Integrated Risk Information System
(IRIS) values in performing health risk assessments. Recent
litigation has called attention to the need for all persons in-
volved in the Superfund risk assessment and remedy selec-
tion processes to be fully aware of the role of IRIS values in
those processes.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Risk assessment,
Toxicology.

PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: RI/FS
& RODS Process

1082 Accessing the $50 Million Set-Aside In the Remedial
Action Budget lor Quick Response at National Priorities
List Sites

Order Number PB92-963342CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 20 Feb 92
The memorandum establishes the procedures required to
access the $50 million that has been set aside from the
FY92 Remedial Action budget for quick response at National
Priorities sites.

Subject index keywords; Federal budgets, Hazardous ma-
terials, Directives, Superfund, Remedial action.

1083 Compendium of ROD Language for FY 1993 Focus
Areas

Order Number PB93-963328CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Apr 93
The compendium covers five major areas of focus for
Record of Decision (ROD) language. These include; Ration-
ale for the selected remedy, Clean-up levels, Eco-risk as-
sessment, Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Require-

202

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: RI/FS & RODS

Process

ments (ARARs), and Enforcement Activities. Examples of
good documentation of each of the five ROD areas of focus
are presented in the compendium.

Subject index keywords: Waste management, Superfund,
Remedial action, Hazardous materials, Record of Decision.

1084 Conducting Remedial Investigations/Feasibility
Studies for CERCLA Municipal Landfill Sites

Order Number PB91-921205CDH, price: PC A14/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 91
The study aids in the development of methodologies and
tools to assist in streamlining the Remedial Investigations/
Feasibility Studies (RI/FS) and selection of remedy process
for landfills. The study; (1) develops tools to assist in scoping
the RI/FS for municipal landfill sites, (2) defines strategies
for characterizing municipal landfill sites that are on the NPL,
and (3) identifying practicable remedial action alternatives for
addressing these types of sites.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $100 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $200), Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche, 307p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Earth fills, Municipalities, Superfund.

1085 Cost of Remedial Action Model

Order Number PB93-963304CDH, price; PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; May 91
The Cost of Remedial Action (CORA) model is a computer-
ized expert advisor used to select remedial actions for Su-
perfund hazardous waste sites and estimate their costs. It
may also be used for RCRA corrective actions. The model is
used for both current site-specific estimates, and for program
budgeting and planning.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials, CORAfCost of Remedial Action).

1086 Cost of Remedial Actions (CORA) Model: Overview
and Applications

Order Number PB93-963318CDH, price; PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Apr 89
The Cost of Remedial Actions (CORA) model estimates site-
specific remedial action costs for hazardous waste sites. The
model is microcomputer-based and has two components: an
expert system to recommend a range of remedial technol-
ogies, and a cost system. The expert system interacts with
the user and develops ranges of recommended remedial
action technologies. The cost system contains algorithms ca-
pable of developing order-of-magnitude cost estimates for 40
demonstrated technologies. The model was used by the U.S.
EPA for the outyear Superfund remedial action budgeting for
FY 1989, FY 1990, and FY 1991 budgeting. The model was

also used to develop U.S. Navy Installation Program budgets
for FY 1989, 1990, and 1991.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $450). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Presented at HAZMACON '89,
Santa Clara, CA., April 1989. 11 p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund, Cost estimates.

1087 Draft Record of Decision for the Aluminum Smelter
Conservation/Modernization Program

Order Number DE87001323CDH, price: PC AOi/MF A01
Bonneville Power Administration, Portland, OR. Div. of
Commercial and Industrial Programs.; Department of Energy,
Washington, DC; May 86

The program would be available for a 2-year period, with an
option for BPA to extend it for 1 additional year. The program
would be available to all ten Northwest primary aluminum
smelters for qualifying projects on a first come, first consid-
ered basis. The total program budget over the 10-year pay-
ment term would be limited to $100 million, with annual
budget expenditures not to exceed $10 million (in 1985 dol-
lars). The incentive would be a direct payment, for a 10-year
term, based on the difference in required kWh/lb of alumi-
num production before and after plant modernization. An in-
centive of 5 mill/saved kWh for plant production efficiency
improvements would be paid to qualifying projects. The alu-
minum companies would propose modernization projects to
BPA. Minimum criteria would be described by BPA in a Re-
quest for Proposals. A reduction in total power entitlement
(contract demand) would be required from the aluminum
companies in return for BPA financial participation. The re-
duction in contract demand would be equal to the reduction
in power requirements resulting from the energy efficiency
improvements. Projects selected by BPA would need to dem-
onstrate actual electric energy electric energy utilization effi-
ciency improvement (reduced kWhs/lb of aluminum produc-
tion) to qualify for BPA incentive payments. Simple curtail-
ment of electric energy use would not qualify. Protecting pro-
prietary information contained in proposals submitted by the
respective companies would be a condition of the conserva-
tion/modernization program. BPA will work together with the
aluminum companies to establish requirements for proprie-
tary information and to develop protective procedures. BPA
would conduct an ongoing evaluation of the conservation/
modernization program and assess the findings on an annual
basis. If the evaluation suggests that programmatic features
should be modified or added to secure additional benefits for
BPA and the region, BPA would initiate changes in the pro-
grsm. (ERA citation 12:000688)

Specifications: Portions of this document are illegible in
microfiche products. 178p.

Subject index keywords: Aluminium, Metal Industry, Smelt-
ers.

1088 Feasibility Study: Detailed Analysis of Remedial
Action Alternatives

Order Number PB90-272675CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 90
The document is the fourth and final document in a series of
fact sheets describing the remedial investigation/feasibility

203

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: RI/FS & RODS
Process

study (RI/FS). The fact sheet is a synopsis of Chapter 6 of
'The Guidance for Conducting Remedial Investigations and
Feasibility Studies Under CERCLA' (Directive No. 9355.3-01)
which addresses the detailed analysis of remedial action al-
ternatives. Additionally, the fact sheet provides Remedial
Project Managers (RPMs) with information on how to
manage this phase of the FS efficiently and effectively.
Specifications: 7p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Superfund,
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Remedial
action, Waste management, Preremedial actions.

1089 Feasibility Study: Development and Screening of
Remedial Action Alternatives

Order Number PB90-274416CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 89

The fact sheet provides a summary of Chapter 4 of the 'In-
terim Final Guidance for Conducting Remedial Investigations
and Feasibility Studies Under CERCLA' which discusses the
development and screening of alternatives for Remedial
Action. The fact sheet also provides information intended to
assist the Remedial Project Manager in managing this por-
tion of the Feasibility Study efficiently and effectively.
Specifications: See also PB90-272675. 7p.

Subject index keywords; Hazardous materials, Superfund,
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Remedial action.

1090 Final Policy on Setting RI/FS Priorities

Order Number PB91-921324CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 27 Dec 90
The directive summarizes the final policy on setting RI/FS
prioritization. The policy's goal is to demonstrate Superfund's
compliance with the Worst Problems First Policy at the earli-
est stage of the remedial process. It outlines the specific ob-
jectives and goals of the new policy and offers guidance to
the regions on how best to implement the policy.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico: all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 10p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Remedial action, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response.

1091 FY 1992 Themes for Regional Coordination to
Support Continuous Improvements of Superfund's
Remedial Program

Order Number PB92-963368CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 91
The directive outlines the FY 92 themes for regional coordi-
nation to support continuous improvements of Superfund's
remedial program. Themes represent critical program areas
that require special emphasis by Regional management,
staff, and Regional Coordinators, This effort will improve the
efficiency and quality of the Superfund program which fur-
thers their commitment to Total Quality Management. Re-
gional Coordinators will promote guidance awareness and
national consistency.

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

1092 Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS

Order Number PB90-274390CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 89
The fact sheet summarizes Chapter Two of 'Interim Final
Guidance for Conducting Remedial Investigations and Feasi-
bility Studies Under CERCLA." The Fact Sheet also provides
information on how to manage the scoping phase of the Rl/
FS process.

Specifications; 9p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Project
management, Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, Remedial action.

1993 Guidance on Implementation of the 'Contribute to
Remedial Performance' Provision

Order Number PB93-963413CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Apr 87
The provision promotes the performance of removal actions
that address threats more efficiently by considering the over-
all site cleanup before the start of the action. To the maxi-
mum extent practicable, removal actions should be desigend
to avoid wasteful, repetitive, short-term actions that do not
contribute to the efficient, cost-effective performance of long-
term remedial actions to be taken by the EPA, State, or other
party. The major objective of this requirement is to provide
maximum protection of public health and the environment at
minimal cost by avoidance of removal restarts. The focus of
this provision is on avoidance of restarts that are due to re-
curring threats that were not adequately abated in the origi-
nal removal action, and threats from deteriorating site condi-
tions that should have been foreseen.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit S225 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $450). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 6p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Remedial action,

1094 Guidance on Oversight of Potentially Responsible
Party Remedial Investigations and Feasibility Studies.
Volume 1

Order Number PB91-228361CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
PRC Environmental Management, Inc., McLean, VA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Jun 91
Volume 1 of the document addresses oversight of remedial
investigations and feasibility studies (RI/FSs) conducted by
potentially responsible parties (PRPs) at enforcement-lead
sites addressed under the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability Act, as amended
(CERCLA). It parallels activities described in the 'Guidance
for Conducting Remedial Investigations and Feasibility Stud-
ies Under CERCLA' (OSWER Directive No. 9355.3-01, Octo-

204

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: RI/FS & RODS

Process

ber, 1988, referred to here as the 'RI/FS Guidance') and the
'Model Statement of Work for a Remedial Investigation and
Feasibility Study Conducted by Potentially Responsible Par-
ties' (OSWER Directive No. 9835.8, June 2, 1989, referred to
here as the 'Model SOW for PRP-lead RI/FSs'). It provides
project managers with the procedures required to organize
and perform appropriate oversight duties and responsibilities.
The document is guidance only; it is not a binding set of re-
quirements and does not create rights for any party.
Specifications: Also pub. as OSWER DIRECTIVE-
9835.1(G), See also Volume 2, PB91 -228379. Sponsored by
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response. I27p.

Subject index keywords: Remedial action, Hazardous ma-
terials, Waste management, Superfund, Potentially responsi-
ble parties, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

1095 Guidance on Oversight of Potentially Responsible
Party Remedial Investigations and Feasibility Studies.
Volume 2. Appendices

Order Number PB91-228379CDH, price: PC A09/MF A03
PRC Environmental Management, Inc., McLean, VA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Jun 91
Volume 2 of the document describes the oversight of sam-
pling and analysis activities (Appendix B1) and of well drilling
and installation activity (Appendix CI) conducted during a
Remedial investigation (Rl) by potentially responsible parties
(PRPs) at Enforcement-lead sites addressed under the Com-
prehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Li-
ability Act, as amended (CERCLA). Checklists to assist in the
documentation of sampling and analysis activities are con-
tained in Appendix B2 while documentation of well drilling
and installation activities are contained in Appendix C2. The
information presented in Volume 2 is consistent with the ref-
erences listed at the end of Appendices B and C.
Specifications: Also pub. as OSWER DIRECTIVE-
9835.1(D). See also Volume 1, PB91-228361. Sponsored by
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response. 196p,

Subject index keywords: Remedial action, Hazardous ma-
terials, Waste management, Superfund, Potentially responsi-
ble parties, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

1096 Guide to Addressing Pre-RQD and Post-ROD
Changes

Order Number PB91-921351CDH, price: PC AQ2/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 91
The Fact Sheet outlines the methods of categorizing pre-
and post-ROD changes and the ways in which changes
should be documented. More detailed guidance for pre-ROD
changes and both significant and fundamental post-ROD
changes can be found in chapters 5 and 8, respectively, of
the Interim Final Guidance on Preparing Superfund Decision
Documents (OSWER Directive 9355.3-02).

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

1097 Guide to Developing Action Memorandums

Order Number PB91-921317CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 90
The fact sheet describes the essential components of Action
memorandums used to initiate a removal action, as well as
special cases like enforcement-lead removals and special
circumstances such as actions that require additional funds,
a change in the scope of response, or an exemption to the
statutory limits under section 104(c) of CERCLA. EPA pre-
pares Action Memos for all Fund-lead removal actions.
Action Memos describe a site's history, current activities,
health and environmental threats, and proposed actions and
costs.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; ali others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 5p.

Subject index k8ywords, Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

1098 Guide to Developing Superfund No Action, Interim
Action, and Contingency Remedy RODs

Order Number PB91-921350CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 91
The guide provides quick reference to the essential compo-
nents of Records of Decision (RODs) that are prepared to
document three specific types of remedial action decisions:
(1) no action; (2) interim actions; and (3) contingency reme-
dies. In preparing one of these three types of RODs, Reme-
dial Project Managers (RPMs) should modify the format of
the 'standard ROD' lor final response actions as indicated in
the guide.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; ail others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Available separately or as part of
PB91-921265. 7p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Record of Decision.

1099 Guide to Developing Superfund Proposed Plans

Order Number PB90-273855CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01

Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of

Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 89

The fact sheet outlines the major components of the Super-

fund Proposed Pian and suggests effective ways in which the

various sections can be presented.

Specifications: 6p.

Subject index keywords: Guidelines, Hazardous materials,
Superfund, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response,
Waste management.

1100 Guide to Selecting Superfund Remedial Actions

Order Number PB90-273863CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 90
The fact sheet describes the statutory requirements for
CERCLA remedies at hazardous waste sites and the process
EPA has established in the 1990 revised National Gontingen-

205

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: RI/FS & RODS
Process

cy Plan (NCP) for meeting those requirements. This process
is a general framework for reaching a judgement as to the
most appropriate method of achieving protection of human
health arid the environment at a particular site.
Specifications: 9p.

Subject index keywords: Guidelines, Hazardous materials,
Superfund, Remedial action, Waste management, Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

1101 Management Systems Review of the Superfund Rl/
FS: Opportunities for Streamlining

Order Number PB90-264136CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Research Triangle Inst., Research Triangle Park, NC.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Quality
Assurance Management Staff; c1990
The Management Systems Review (MSR) is an important
component of EPA's quality assurance program to assess
the effectiveness of environmental data operations and the
quality assurance/quality control activities designed to sup-
port those operations. MSRs inform managers about aspects
of the environmental data operation that are working well
and those which may warrant some improvement A recent
review of the Superfund remedial investigation/feasibility
study (RI/FS) has shown that the MSR is an excellent tool
for providing a systematic definition of complex environmen-
tal data operations and for enabling a thorough analysis of
these operations. The MSR utilized information gathered
from interviews of Regional personnel and from case studies
of recently completed RI/FSs. The findings indicated that en-
vironmental data play an important role in most RI/FS deci-
sions and that thorough and structured scoping is critical to
the effectiveness of the RI/FS. Analysis of the RI/FS proc-
ess using a comprehensive flow diagram identified several
opportunities for changes that may increase efficiency in
data collection and the reliability of RI/FS decisions. These
changes provide for more effective scoping activities, a
streamlined feasibility study, and increased use of treatability
studies during the Rl. A pilot demonstration of these process
changes is being planned for a Regional RI/FS. (Copyright
(c) 1990-Air and Waste Management Association.)
Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of the Air and Work Manage-
ment Association, v40 n5 p753-737 May 90. Sponsored by
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Quality
Assurance Management Staff. 7p.

Subject Index keywords: Waste management, Superfund,
Remedial action.

1102 Performance of Risk Assessments in Remedial
Investigation/Feasibility Studies (RI/FSs) Conducted by
Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs)

Order Number PB91-139493CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 28 Aug 90
The purpose of the directive is to provide initial guidance on
implementing the recent decision that in the future EPA will
develop all risk assessments for sites remediated under
CERCLA. It focuses on the applicability of the decision to
new and existing orders or decrees for RI/FSs conducted by
PRPs.,In essence, EPA or a State (whose oversight of the
PRP is Federally funded) will develop the risk assessment for
all new orders or decrees. For existing orders or decrees
that specify that the PRP prepares the risk assessment, the
PRP will be given an opportunity under the terms of the
order or decree to complete an acceptable risk assessment

under stringent oversight and without undue delay. The term
'risk assessment' in the directive is meant to include environ-
mental assessments as well as assessments of risks to
human health.

Specifications: 8p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

1103 Presumptive Remedies: Policy and Procedures

Order Number PB93-963345CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
The objective of the presumptive remedies initiative is to use
the program's past experience to streamline site investiga-
tions and speed up selection of cleanup actions. Over time
presumptive remedies are expected to ensure consistency in
remedy selection and reduce the cost and time required to
clean up similar types of sites. Presumptive remedies are ex-
pected to be used at all appropriate sites except under un-
usual site-specific circumstances. EPA plans to develop a
series of directives on presumptive remedies for various
types of sites. The directive serves as an overall guide to the
presumptive remedies initiative and its effect on site cleanup.
Through a question and answer format, it explains, in general
terms, ways in which presumptive remedies will streamline or
change the remedial and removal processes from the con-
ventional processes and how certain Superfund policies will
be affected by the initiative.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Government policies,
Administrative procedures.

1104 Presumptive Remedies: Site Characterization and
Technology Selection for CERCLA Sites with Volatile
Organic Compounds in Soils

Order Number PB93-963346CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
Presumptive remedies are preferred technologies for
common categories of sites, based on historical patterns of
remedy selection and EPA's scientific and engineering eval-
uation of performance data on technology implementation.
The directive identifies the presumptive remedies for Com-
prehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Li-
ability Act (CERCLA) sites with soils contaminated by volatile
organic compounds (VOCs). Soil vapor extraction (SVE),
thermal desorption, and incineration are the presumptive
remedies for Superfund sites with VOC-contaminated soil as-
suming the site characteristics meet certain criteria.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 26p.

Subject index keywords: Site characterization, Technology
assessment, Soil contamination, Superfund.

206

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: RI/FS & RODS

Process

1105 Presumptive Remedy for CERCLA Municipal Landfill
Sites

Order Number PB93-963339CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
The directive establishes containment as the presumptive
remedy for CERCLA municipal landfills. The framework for
the presumptive remedy for these sites is presented in a
streamlining manual entitled Conducting Remedial Investiga-
tions/Feasibility Studies for CERCLA Municipal Landfill Sites,
February 1991 (OSWER Directive 9355, 3-11). The directive
highlights and emphasizes the importance of certain stream-
lining principles related to the scoping (planning) stages of
the remedial investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) that were
identified in the manual. The directive also provides clarifica-
tion of and additional guidance in the following areas: (1) the
level of detail appropriate for risk assessment of source
areas at municipal landfills and (2) the characterization of hot
spots.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Landfills, Remediation.

1106 Remedial Investigation; Site Characterization and
Treatability Studies

Order Number PB90-274408CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 89
The fact sheet summarizes Chapters 3 and 5 of the 'Interim
Final Guidance for Conducting Remedial Investigations and
Feasibility Studies Under CERCLA.' The document also dis-
cusses site characteristics and treatability studies, and in-
cludes information on how to manage these aspects of the
Rl.

Specifications: 7p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment, Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response, Remedial action.

1107 Revisions to OMB Circular A-94 on Guidelines and
Discount Rates for Benefit-Cost Analysis

Order Number PB93-963297CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 25 Jun 93
The memorandum revises the discount rate used in cost esti-
mation for Superfund activities to 7%. This discount rate
should be used in estimating the present worth value for po-
tential alternatives in the remedial investigation/feasibility
study and for remedial actions.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $225 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $450), Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB89-184626, 31p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Interest rate.

1108 RI/FS Improvements

Order Number PB90-272642CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 23 Jul 87
The directive identifies methods of reducing overall project
schedules and costs while retaining a quality product. Four

major points are included: phased Remedial Investigations/
Feasibility Studies (Rt/FS), streamlined project planning,
management of handoffs, and Remedial Investigation/Feasi-
bility Study (RI/FS) control reviews.

Specifications: 14p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response.

1109 RI/FS Improvements Follow-Up

Order Number PB90-249657CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01 • .
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 25 Apr 88
The reports directive delineates improvements developed for
more effective Remedial Investigations/Feasibility Studies
(RI/FS).

Specifications: 18p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Project
management, Superfund, Remedial investigations.

1110 RI/FS Streamlining

Order Number PB91-214981CDH, price; PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 14 Feb 89
The directive presents a second set of recommendations for
streamlining measures that will reduce the cost and duration
of Ri/FS's. Recommendations include those related to tech-
nical issues, procurement enhancement, program manage-
ment, State coordination and enforcement.

Specifications: 51 p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

1111 ROD Annual Report, FY 1989

Order Number PB90-258484CDH, price: PC A17/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 90
Provides the Regions and Headquarters with summary data
on FY 89 Records of Decision (RODs), and consists of the
following sections: Introduction - highlights specific accom-
plishments in the ROD process; ROD Summaries - de-
scribes site conditions and key contaminants, selected reme-
dial actions, specific remedy performance standards and
goals, and institutional controls for each FY 89 ROD; FY 89
ROD Summary Table - summarizes all remedial actions,
capital operation and maintenance costs, and contaminated
media; FY 82-FY 88 ROD Summary Table - summarizes all
RODs from FY 82 through FY 88; ROD Keyword List - pro-
vides major keyword categories and their subcategories for
all RODs approved to date.

Specifications: See also report for FY88, PB89-235212,
379p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Waste treatment, Superfund, Remedial action, Record
of decision.

1112 ROD Annual Report, FY 1990

Order Number PB91-921277CDH. price: PC A24/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 91
The report presents the Regional and Headquarters staff
with summary data on RODs, The report features specific ac-
complishments in the ROD process and summarizes the

207

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: RI/FS & RODS
Process

year's RODs by describing site conditions and key contami-
nants, selected remedial actions, specific remedy perform-
ance standards and goals, and institutional controls.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also PB90-258484, 557p.
Subject index keywords: Groundwater, Hazardous materi-
als, Waste disposal, Superfund.

1113 ROD Annual Report, FY1991. Volume 1

Order Number PB92-963359CDH, price: PC$77.00
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 92
The ROD Annual Report FY 1991 is a reference publication
designed to provide Headquarters, Regions, and the public
with summary information on Superfund RODs. RODs docu-
ment the remedy decision for a site or operable unit. RODs
certify that the remedy selection process followed require-
ments of CERCLA, and discuss the major technical compo-
nents of the remedy. Volume 1 highlights specific information
about the RODs signed during FY 1991. It includes exhibits
of the types of RODs, treatment vs. containment remedies,
treatment technologies used for remedies, treatment trains,
and estimates for remedy costs. ROD abstracts and a list of
RODs signed in FY 1991 describe site history, key contami-
nants, the selected remedial action, performance standards,
institutional controls, and estimated cost for each remedy.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. See also Volume 2, PB92-963360
and PB91-921277. 652p.

Subject index keywords: Ground water, Hazardous materi-
als, Waste disposal, Superfund.

1114 ROD Annual Report, FY1991. Volume 2

Order Number PB92-963360CDH, price; PC A18/MF A04
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 92
The ROD Annual Report FY 1991 is a reference publication
designed to provide Headquarters, Regions, and the public
with summary information on Superfund RODs. This year the
report is in two volumes. Volume 2 contains the FY 1982 -
1990 ROD Summary Table which lists the remedial action
site name and date of ROD signature, and summarizes the
threat or problem, waste volume components of the selected
remedy, cleanup goals, and estimated costs for each FY
1982 - 1990 ROD. Volume 2 also contains a list of RODs
signed to date, a keyword list for all FY 1982 - 1990 RODs, a
list of ROD Amendments, and a list of ROD Explanations of
Significant Differences.

Subject index keywords: Ground water, Hazardous materi-
als, Waste disposal, Superfund, Record of Decision.

1115 ROD Annual Report, FY 1992

Order Number PB93-963349CDH, price; PC A22/MF A04
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 93
The Records of Decision (RODs) highlighted in the annual
report document compliance with SARA mandates for the re-
medial program in FY 1992. One hundred sixty-four (164)
RODs and eight (8) ROD Amendments, including Fund-lead,
Enforcement, and Federal Facility RODs were signed during
FY 1992. The lead breakdown for the RODs is as follows: 53
Fund-lead plus 85 Enforcement-lead, equals 118; 118 plus
46 Federal Facility-lead equals 164 RODs, The eight Amend-
ments consist of 3 Fund-lead and 5 Enforcement-lead RODs.
119 of the 172 RODs addressed source control remediation,
and 28 RODs addressed ground-water-only remediation. The
remaining 25 RODs were no action/no further action reme-
dies. Of the total 119 source control RODs, 85 addressed a
final source control remedy, and 34 addressed an interim
source control remedy. 78 of the 119 source control RODs
selected both source control and ground water remediation
components.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action, Haz-
ardous materials, Record of Decision.

1116 Role of Expedited Response Actions under SARA

Order Number PB91-214221CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 21 Apr 87
The directive serves as a follow-up to OSWER Directive
9360.0-10 (July 8, 1986) entitled 'Expedited Response Ac-
tions,' and updates the basic tenets of expedited response
actions (ERAs) and their role in the Superfund Remedial Pro-
gram.

Specifications: Portions of this document are not fully legi-
ble. 13p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

1117 Scoper's Notes: An Ri/FS Costing Guide. Bringing In
a Quality RI/FS on Time and Within Budget

Order Number PB90-258369CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Feb 90
The guide outlines the tasks and sub-tasks typically conduct-
ed as part of a Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (Rl/
FS), and presents a strate gy based on site complexity and
task difficulty for estimating a project's cost. It provides cost
guidelines which can be used to estimate funding needs in
advance of issuing work assignments and evaluating con-
tractor proposals.

Specifications: 29p.

Subject index keywords: Guidelines, Cost estimates, Re-
medial action, Superfund, Waste management.

208

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: RD/RA

1118 Streamlining the RI/FS for CERCLA Municipal
Landfill Sites

Order Number PB90-274424CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
The fact sheet discusses streamlining the RI/FS for munici-
pal landfills with respect to site characterization, risk assess-
ment, and the development of remedial action alternatives.
Streamlining is possible since approximately 20% of the sites
on the NPL are municipal landfills which typically share simi-
lar characteristics.

Specifications: 7p.

Subject index keywords; Hazardous materials, Earth fills,
Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Remedial action.

1119 Streamlining the RI/FS for CERCLA Municipal
Landfill Sites

Order Number PB91-921301CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Approximately 20 percent of the sites on the National Prior-
ities List (NPL) are municipal landfills which typically share
similar characteristics. Because of the similarity the Super-
fund Program anticipates that their remediation will involve
similar waste management approaches. As stated in the Na-
tional Contingency Plan, EPA expects that containment tech-
nologies will generally be appropriate for waste that poses a
relatively low long-term threat or where treatment is impracti-
cable (Sec. 300.430(a)(1)(iii)(B),55FR8846(March 8, 1990)).
In addition, EPA expects treatment to be considered for iden-
tifiable areas of highly toxic and/or mobile material that con-
stitute the principal threat(s) posed by the site (Sec.
300.430(a)(1)(iii)(A)). The similarity in landfill characteristics
and the NCP expectations make it possible to streamline the
RI/FS for municipal landfills with respect to site characteriza-
tion, risk assessment, and the development of remedial
action alternatives. The fact sheet outlines available stream-
lining techniques for each of these three phases of an Rl/
FS. Additional information, including tools to assist in scoping
activities, will be included in the document Conducting Re-
medial Investigations/Feasibility Studies for CERCLA Munici-
pal Landfill Sites (November 1990, Directive No. 9355,3-11).
The document will be available from the Center for Environ-
mental Research Information (FTS 684-7562 or 513-569-
7562).

Specifications; Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche, 5p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Remedial action, Municipal wastes, Earth fills. Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, Comprehensive Environ-
mental Response Compensation and Liability Act

1120 Structure and Components of Five-Year Reviews

Order Number PB91-921368CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 91
The fact sheet provides guidance for planning and conduct-
ing five-year reviews. These include: initiation and termination
of reviews; responsibilities and funding; content; and docu-
menting results of reviews. The goal of this fact sheet is to
help assure that reviews are implemented in a consistent

manner nationally, with appropriate consideration of local
concerns and widely varying site conditions.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others S300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 3p.

Subject index keywords: Waste disposal, Hazardous mate-
rials, Superfund.

1121 Structure and Components of Five-Year Reviews

Order Number PB91-921369CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 91
The directive provides guidance primarily on the implementa-
tion of five-year reviews and the issues associated with im-
plementation. These include: triggering points for reviews, re-
sponsibilities and funding, content, and results of reviews.
The goal of this directive is to assure that reviews are imple-
mented in a consistent manner nationally, with appropriate
consideration of local concerns and widely varying site condi-
tions.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund.

1122 Technology Selection Guide for Wood Treater Sites

Order Number PB93-963329CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 26 May 93
The purpose of the memorandum is to transmit the Technol-
ogy Selection Guide for Wood Treater Sites. The fact sheet
is part of a series of guidance documents being developed
on presumptive remedies at various categories of sites. The
technology selection guide provides information on specific
technologies and performance data. The information includes
a procedural outline, practical considerations, and treatment
technology tables for sludge, soil, sediment, and ground and
surface water.

Subject index keywords; Superfund, Wood preservatives,
Waste disposal, Pollution control.

PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: RD/

1123 Cost Estimating Systems for Remedial Action
Projects

Order Number PB91-231191CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab.; Corps of Engineers, Omaha,
NE. Missouri River Div; 1991

The paper details the ongoing collaboration between the
U.S. EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in the devel-
opment of complementary microcomputer based cost esti-
mating systems for hazardous waste remediations. The U.S.

209

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: RD/RA

EPA system, 'Remedial Action Cost Estimating System'
(RACES), is a technology based application. Estimates gen-
erated by RACES are based upon cost engineering relation-
ships. The estimates are designed for use in the early stages
of remediation design. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
system, 'Micro-Computer Aided Cost Engineering System'
(M-CACES), is a 'bottoms-up' system for use in situations
where detailed design information is available. While both
systems will stand alone, they have been designed to allow
the transfer of estimates generated by RACES directly into
the M-CACES system.

Specifications; Prepared in cooperation with Corps of Engi-
neers, Omaha, NE. Missouri River Div. 6p.

Subject Index keywords: Remedial action, Cost estimates,
Hazardous materials, Waste management, Superfund, Reme-
dial Action Cost Estimating System, Micro-Computer Aided
Cost Engineering System.

1124 EPA Oversight of Remedial Designs and Remedial
Actions Performed by PRPs

Order Number PB91 -921357CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 90
The Fact Sheet presents an overview of EPA's guidance for
oversight of enforcement lead projects in which a Potentially
Responsible Party (PRP) conducts the Remedial Design (RD)
and Remedial Action (RA). PRP oversight is to ensure that
selected remedies are protective of public health and the en-
vironment and are in compliance with the Settlement Agree-
ment. For further information, refer to Interim Final Guidance
on EPA Oversight of Remedial Designs and Remedial Ac-
tions Performed by Potentially Responsible Parties, OSWER
Directive 9355.5-01, February 1990.

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

1125 EPA/U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Payment
Process, Direct Cite/Revised Reimbursement Methods

Order Number PB91-921347CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 21 Mar 90
The directive transmits new procedures for the disbursement
of funds to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) under
EPA lead Superfund projects.

Subject index keywords; Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

1126 EPA/USACE Payment Process: Direct Cite/Revised
Reimbursement Methods

Order Number PB90-273897CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 90
The fact sheet announces a new procedure for paying the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for their Superfund related ac-

tivities. It describes the current procedure and outlines the
changes the Office of Emergency and Remedial Response,
Office of the Comptroller, Office of Administration and
USAGE are implementing.

Specifications: 7p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Salary ad-
ministration, Superfund, Office of Solid Waste and Emergen-
cy Response, Army Corps of Engineers, Waste management,
Reimbursements.

1127 Expediting Remedial Construction

Order Number PB90-272683CDH, price; PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 89
The fact sheet examines activities to be considered in Reme-
dial Management Strategies to accelerate remedial construc-
tion.

Specifications: 9p.

Subject index keywords; Hazardous materials, Construction
management, Superfund, Remedial action, Preremedial
action, Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emer-
gency Response.

1128 Guidance on EPA Oversight of Remedial Designs
and Remedial Actions Performed by Potentially
Responsible Parties

Order Number PB90-226069CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 90
The Interim Final Guidance on EPA Oversight of Remedial
Designs and Remedial Actions Performed by Potentially Re-
sponsible Parties was issued in order to ensure that selected
remedies being conducted are protective of public health and
the environment, and that the Remedial Actions are in com-
pliance with the applicable performance standards. It pro-
vides guidance for oversight when EPA is the lead agency
on a project in which a Potentially Responsible Party con-
ducts the Remedial Design and Remedial Action. The guid-
ance does not cover projects when the Remedial Design and
Remedial Action is performed with Superfund monies in
which the EPA or the State is the lead agency. This will be
the subject of future guidance documents.

Specifications: 56p.

Subject Index keywords: Guidelines, Hazardous materials,
Project management, Remedial action, Cleanup operations,
Superfund.

1129 Guidance on Expediting Remedial Design and
Remedial Action

Order Number PB90-273871CDH, price; PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 90
This document examines ways to expedite remedial design
and remedial action so that cleanup activities can be com-
pleted more quickly. Intended for use by remedial project
managers, remedial design contractors, and others involved
in planning remediation activities. It should be used as a
means to evaluate whether a project is suited for expediting
and to determine the methods that could be used.
Specifications: 57p.

Subject index keywords: Guidelines, Hazardous materials,
Superfund, Remedial designs, Remedial action, Waste man-
agement.

210

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: RD/RA

1130 Guidance on Oversight of PRP Performed RD/RA

Order Number PB90-249707CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 14 Feb 90
The directive provides interim final guidance on EPA over-
sight of Remedial Designs (RD) and Remedial Actions (RA)
performed by Potentially Responsible Parties (PRP). Insures
that remedies being conducted by PRPs are protective of the
public health and environment, and are in compliance with
applicable performance standards.

Specifications: 56p.

Subject index keywords: Regulations, Supervision, Guid-
ance, Superfund, Remedial action, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Remedial designs, Potentially respon-
sible parties.

1131 Procedure for Use of USAGE Preplaced Contracts
to Expedite Superfund Cleanup Tasks

Order Number PB94-963243CDH, price: Standing Order, call
for price

Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 94

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) has procured
preplaced indefinite delivery contracts to provide the EPA
with streamlined, flexible access to engineering, removal,
and remedial services at selected Superfund sites. The docu-
ment describes each contract in terms of scope, applicability,
criteria for use, response time, and procedures for accessing
the contract.

Subject index keywords: Corps of Engineers, Superfund,
Contract management.

1132 Procuring Innovative Technologies at Remedial
Sites: Q's and A's and Case Studies

Order Number PB92-232388CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Apr 92
The fact sheet is designed to assist EPA Remedial Project
Managers (RPMs) and Contracting Officers (COs) with the
procurement of innovative treatment technologies. RPMs,
COs, and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) personnel
were interviewed to obtain information on their experiences
in procuring innovative technologies. EPA's Technology Inno-
vation Office (TlO)has documented case histories of exper-
ences with acquiring innovative technologies in the Super-
fund program. Remedial sites chosen for inclusion in the
review were Fund-lead sites that had started or completed
the procurement of an innovative technology, including biore-
mediation, thermal desorption, vacuum extraction, chemical
treatment, chemical extraction, and in situ soil flushing. The
results of these interviews are presented in a question and
answer format. In addition, specific detailed information on
each site is presented in tabular form.

Specifications: 24p,

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment, Superfund.

1133 Real Estate Acquisition Procedures for USAGE
Projects

Order Number PB91-921355CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 90
The USAGE, because of extensive experience in real estate
activities is an appropriate supporting agency for Superfund
cleanup when a health based relocation is not required. EPA
is authorized to acquire by purchase, lease, donation, con-
demnation, or otherwise any real property needed to conduct
a remedial action. The fact sheet addresses the areas of ini-
tial planning, request and approval process, acquisition, sum-
mary of the major roles and responsibilities, and the timeta-
ble for 104(j) acquisitions. The role of the Remedial Project
Manager (RPMs) is discussed.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials. Real estate, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response.

1134 Remedial Action Report: Documentation for
Operable Unit Completion

Order Number PB92-963364CDH, price: PC A01 /MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jun 92
The progress in moving a site toward the ultimate goal of de-
letion from the NPL typically involves several operable units
or multiple phases of construction over a period of several
years. The purpose of the Remedial Action Report is to doer
ument the activities that occur under each specific remedial
action operable unit at a site. The report provides documen-
tation that a particular operable unit has met its objectives as
well as summary information for subsequent inclusion in the
Superfund Site Close Out Report, it also serves as a source
of lessons learned for project managers and designers of
future remedial action projects.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de»
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 4p.

Subject index keywords; Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

1135 Remedial Action, Treatment, and Disposal of
Hazardous Waste. Proceedings of the Annual Hazardous
Waste Research Symposium (17th). Held in Cincinnati,
Ohio on April 9-11, 1991

Order Number PB91-233627CDH, price; PC$84.00
JACA Corp., Fort Washington, PA.; Science Applications
International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.'Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; Apr
91

The Seventeenth Annual RREL Research Symposium on Re-
medial Action, Treatment and Disposal of Hazardous Waste
was held in Cincinnati, Ohio, April 9-11, 1991. The purpose
of the Symposium was to present the latest significant re-
search findings from ongoing and recently completed
projects funded by the Risk Reduction Engineering Laborato-
ry (RREL). These Proceedings are organized in three sec-

211

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: RD/RA

tions: Sessions A and B consist of paper presentations. Ses-
sion C contains the poster abstracts. Subjects include reme-
dial action treatment and control technologies for waste dis-
posal, landfill liner and cover systems, underground storage
tanks, and demonstration and development of innovative/al-
ternative treatment technologies for hazardous waste. Alter-
native technology subjects include thermal destruction of
hazardous wastes, field evaluations, existing treatment op-
tions, emerging treatment processes, waste minimization,
and biosystems for hazardous waste destruction.
Specifications: See also PB91-148379. Prepared in coop-
eration with Science Applications International Corp., Cincin-
nati, OH. Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 708p.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment, Waste disposal, Remedial action, Meetings, Research
and development.

1136 Superfund Remedial Action Decision Process:
Database for Selected FY87 Records of Decision

Order Number DE89010163CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Oak Ridge National Lab., TN.; Department of Energy,
Washington, DC; 1989

This report was prepared by Oak Ridge National Laborato-
ry's Office of Risk Analysis (ORNL/ORA) for the Regulatory
Integration Division of EPA's Office of Policy Analysis (OPA).
The purpose of the report is to present data compiled for
analysis of the Superfund decision-making process and char-
acterization of the role of risk assessment in this process.
Data presented are compiled from FY87 Records of Decision
(RODs) and their corresponding support documents. The
present report includes data from a total of 50 RODs from all
EPA regions. These data are summarized and analyzed in a
complementary report (Doty and Travis, 1989). In addition,
although no computerized database has been developed, the
data presented will be useful for addressing further research
questions related to the Superfund remedial action decision
process. (ERA citation 14:025341)

Specifications: Portions of this document are illegible in
microfiche products. 106p.

Subject Index keywords: Ground Water, Superfund, Reme-
dial Action, Risk Assessment, Waste disposal, Water pollu-
tion.

1137 Superfund Remedial Program Financial Management
Authority, Responsibilities and Procedures

Order Number PB91-214106CDH, price; PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 21 Sep 84
The directive discusses the Superfund delegations approved
April 16, 1984, the Regional Offices have additional authority
and responsibilities for significant portions of the remedial
program. This includes both programmatic and administrative
authority and responsibilities, described in detail in the vari-
ous Superfund remedial program guidance packages, and
specific financial management authority, responsibilities and
procedures described in the document.

Specifications: 28p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

1138 U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Assistance to the
Superfund Program

Order Number PB91-921319CDH, price: PC AG1/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 90
The fact sheet outlines assistance available from the Depart-
ment of the Interior's Bureau of Reclamation's Denver Office
and the five Regional Offices, Reclamation has developed
expertise in total project management, including planning,
engineering design, research, construction management, and
in project operation and maintenance. Under an Interagency
Agreement (IAG) entitled 'Superfund Management and Sup-
port Activities,' funding has been authorized for a number of
activities relating to Reclamation's assistance in Superfund,
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 5p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Bureau of Reclamation, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response.

1139 USAGE Preplaced and Rapid Response Contracts

Order Number PB90-273889CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 89
The fact sheet describes the Preplaced Remedial Action
(PRA) and Rapid Response (RR) programs and contracts, ft
includes an overview of the contract processes, the roles
and responsibilities of USAGE and EPA, and resource and
contract management.

Specifications: 6p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Project
management, Contract administration, Superfund, Remedial
action, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response,
Waste management

1140 Use of Removal Approaches to Speed Up Remedial
Action Projects

Order Number PB90-274382CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 7 Jul 89
The directive defines the basic requirements to be met when
a Region chooses to use removal authorities and contracting
methods to speed up remedial projects on National Priorities
List (NPL) sites where surface cleanups may result in a total
site cleanup or completion of a major portion of the site.
Specifications: 10p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Superfund,
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Remedial action.

1141 Use of Time and Materials and Cost Reimbursement
Subcontracts for Remedial Actions under the Alternative
Remedial Contracting Strategy Contracts

Order Number PB93-963282CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Resporse: 29 Jul 92
The directive is intended to establish agency guidance on
the use of time and materials and cost reimbursement con-
tracts for remedial actions in general and to provide specific
instruction regarding the use of these approaches in subcon-

212

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: RQ's & Continuous

Release

trading under the Alternative Remedial Contracting Strategy
(ARCS) contracts.

Subject index keywords; Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Altrnative Remedial Contracting Strategy.

PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: RQ's
& Continuous Release

1142 Assessing Reports of Continuous Releases of
Hazardous Substances: A Guide for EPA Regions

Order Number PB91-921315CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 90
Reporting continuous releases of hazardous substances that
equal or exceed a reportable quantity (RQ) has been re-
quired under the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) since its enact-
ment in 1980. Section 103(f)(2) of CERCLA provides that re-
leases of hazardous substances that are continuous and
stable in quantity and rate may be reported annually or
whenever there is a stat stically significant increase (SSI).
The purpose of the guidance document is to provide assist-
ance to the EPA Regions by discussing and making recom-
mendations regarding the options available for evaluating re-
ports of continuous releases. The effective implementation of
the continuous release reporting regulation will depend large-
ly on whether the EPA Regions are able to fully and easily
evaluate the continuous release reports they receive.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 18p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Guidelines,
Reporting requirements, Superfund, US EPA Regions 1-10,
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and
Liability Act, Superfund.

1143 Continuous Release-Emergency Response
Notification System and Priority Assessment Model:
Model Documentation

Order Number PB91-168468CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 13 Feb 91
The purpose of the model documentation is to provide a de-
tailed description of the modeling and risk analysis proce-
dures used in CR-ERNS/PAM to assist OSCs and other Su-
perfund decision-makers in interpreting the system results.
PAM is a screening-leve! model; to properly interpret PAM's
outputs, the user must understand the limitations and uncer-
tainties in the equations and data used to generate these re-
sults. Chapter 2 presents the system's fate and transport
models and describes the assumptions associated with these
equations. Chapter 3 describes PAM's auxiliary data bases
and provides the source(s) of each parameter and the meth-
ods by which values were selected. Chapter 4 explains the
methods and exposure assumptions used to estimate expo-
sures to hazardous substances and to evaluate the risks and

hazards associated with these exposures. Chapter 5 pre-
sents examples of reports generated by PAM and explains
the meaning of the 'flags' assigned to hazardous substances,
media, and facilities. Appendix A contains versions of the
fate and transport equations used for radionuclides. Appen-
dix B contains copies of PAM's reports.

Specifications: See also PB91-168450 and PB90-249715.
75p.

Subject index keywords: Computerized simulation, Hazard-
ous materials, Superfund, Environmental surveys, Waste
management, Documentation, Emergency Response Notifi-
cation System, Priority Assessment Model.

1144 Continuous Release-Emergency Response
Notification System and Priority Assessment Model:
User's Manual for EPA Regions

Order Number PB91-168450CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 90
The user's manual provides EPA Regional personnel with in-
formation and detailed instructions on how to use the Contin-
uous Release-Emergency Response Notification System
(CR-ERNS) and Priority Assessment Model (PAM), an inte-
grated database management system and screening-level
risk assessment model.

Specifications: See also PB90-249715 and PB91-168468.

88p,

Subject index keywords: User manuals(Computer pro-
grams), Computerized simulation, Hazardous materials, Su-
perfund, Environmental surveys, Waste management, Emer-
gency Response Notification System, Priority Assessment
Model.

1145 Continuous Release - Emergency Response
Notification System. User's Manual for industry

Order Number PB91-921287CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 91
The report announces the availability of the Agency's 'Con-
tinuous Release-Emergency Response Notification System:
User's manual for Industry' and the accompanying diskette.
The diskette contains the Continuous Release-Emergency
Response Notification System (CR-ERNS). The purpose of
the User's Manual is to assist industry in reporting continu-
ous releases of hazardous substances using CR-ERNS.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 36p.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund.

1146 Methodology for Evaluating Potential
Carcinogenicity in Support of Reportable Quantity
Adjustments Pursuant to CERCLA Section 102

Order Number PB93-230027CDH, price; PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Health and Environmental Assessment; Jun 88
The Agency's Human Health Assessment Group (HHAG) has
developed a methodology for ranking CERCLA hazardous
substances for the purpose of establishing reportable quanti-
ties (RQs) based on the primary criteria of potential carcino-
genicity. The methodology combines the weight of evidence

213

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: RQ's & Continuous
Release

and potency factor to determine a hazard ranking of high,
medium, or low which corresponds to an RQ of 1, 10, or 100
pounds, respectively. An appendix is included which lists 194
compounds that were evaluated for potential carcinogenicity
along with their respective weight-of-evidence categories, po-
tency factors, and hazard rankings. Profiles for each of these
194 chemicals are available as separate documents.

Specifications: See also PB89-181366. 59p.

Subject index keywords; Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Health hazards, Risk assessment.

1147 Notification of Hazardous Substance Sites (Section
103(c))

Order Number PB82-191990CDH, price: T02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Jan 82
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
tion, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980 PL 96-510 (com-
monly known as Superfund) mandates in Section 103(c) that
certain persons notify the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) by June 9, 1981, of the existence of sites
where hazardous substances from industries, businesses,
governments, hospitals, and other sources are stored, treat-
ed, or disposed of. This magnetic tape contains records of
8664 notifications of hazardous substance sites that were re-
ported as of the notification deadline date, (June 9, 1981).
For each notification the tape summarizes the location,
person required to notify, amount and type of any hazardous
substance to be found, and any known or suspected re-
leases of hazardous substances on the site reported. The
notifications were compiled to help EPA and State and local
governments remedy problems created by uncontrolled haz-
ardous substance disposal. The tape is sequenced alphabeti-
cally by state and site name within each state, respectively.

Specifications: Source tape is in EBCDIC character set.
Character set restricts preparation to 9 track, one-half inch
tape only. Identify recording mode by specifying density only.
Call NTIS Computer Products if you have questions.

Subject index keywords: Data file, Hazardous materials,
Solid waste disposal.

1148 Notification Requirements for Continuous Releases
of Hazardous Substances

Order Number PB92-963422CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 92

The fact sheet is designed to make facilities more familiar
with the Continuous Releases Final Rule (55 FR 30166, July
24, 1990), which permits reduced reporting of releases of
CERCLA hazardous substances when the releases are 'con-
tinuous and stable in quantity and rate.' It also discusses the
requirements of the continuous release reporting regulations
and addresses many key questions concerning their scope
and applicability, and answers questions about compliance
with the reduced reporting regime permitted for this type of
release.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

1149 Questions and Answers on Release Notification
Requirements and Reportable Quantity Adjustments

Order Number PB93-963411CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Oct 89
The document answers questions for the regulatory commu-
nity concerning CERCLA and SARA Title III release notifica-
tion requirements and reportable quantity adjustments.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 28p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Reporting require-
ments, Pollutant releases.

1150 Reporting Requirements for Continuous Releases of
Hazardous Substances: A Guide for Facilities and
Vessels on Compliance

Order Number PB91-167593CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 90
The purpose of the Guide is to help you understand the defi-
nitions and requirements contained in the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency's (EPA) regulation on reporting continuous
releases of hazardous substances (see 55 FR 30166; July
24, 1990). The effective date of the regulation was Septem-
ber 24, 1990. The continuous release reporting regulation
allows reduced reporting for facilities or vessels that release
hazardous substances in a continuous and stable manner.
The Guide has been designed to provide information neces-
sary to successfully comply with the regulation. The Guide is
divided into two parts. The first part provides general infor-
mation in a question and answer format regarding the contin-
uous release reporting regulation and your responsibility to
report releases of hazardous substances. The second part
contains detailed instructions on how to prepare continuous
release reports that include all required information.
Specifications: 43p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Superfund,
Reporting requirements, Waste management, Comprehen-
sive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability
Act.

1151 Superfund Guide: Clean Air Act Hazardous Air
Pollutants Added to the List of CERCLA Hazardous
Substances

Order Number PB93-963425CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
The fact sheet identifies the 52 CAA hazardous air pollutants
that have been added to the list of CERCLA hazardous sub-
stances and that are now subject to CERCLA requirements;
describes the reporting requirements and exemptions under
CERCLA; and examines reporting exemptions in relation to
releases of ethylene glycol.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Air pollution,
Identifying, Superfund.

214

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Treatability Studies

1152 Superfund Guide: Reportable Quantity Adjustment
for Methyl Isocyanate (MIC)

Order Number PB93-963424CDH, price; PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
The fact sheet contains a discussion of the reportable quan-
tity (RQ) adjustment and release reporting process, the basis
for the current RQ adjustment to 10 pounds for methyl iso-
cyanate (MIC), and information about the facilities that
handle MIC.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Volatile or-
ganic compounds, Pollution control, Superfund, Methyl iso-
cyanate.

PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Treatability Studies

1153 Chemical Dehaiogenation Treatability Studies under
CERCLA: An Overview

Order Number PB92-231299CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
IT Corp., Sharonville, OH.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; May 92
The fact sheet provides a summary of information to facili-
tate the planning and execution of chemical dehaiogenation
treatability studies in support of the RI/FS process. Detailed
information on these pre-ROD treatability studies is provided
in the Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies Under
CERCLA: Chemical Dehaiogenation, EPA/54Q/R-92/013a,
May 1992. The technology-specific guide was designed to be
used in conjunction with the final generic Guide for Conduct-
ing Treatability Studies Under CERCLA, which provides gen-
eral information on the planning and execution of pre- and
post-ROD treatability studies. Although some information on
post-ROD chemical dehaiogenation testing is provided here,
the focus of the fact sheet and the chemical dehaiogenation
guide is on pre-ROD treatability studies.

Specifications: See also PB92-169275. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 10p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Chemical
analysis, Waste treatment, Superfund, Dehaiogenation,

1154 Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
CERCLA

Order Number PB90-249772CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
PEI Associates, inc., Cincinnati, OH.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency
and Remedial Response; Dec 89

The guide describes an approach for conducting treatability
studies that consists of laboratory screening, bench-scale
testing, and pilot-scale testing. The guide also presents a
stepwise approach or protocol for conducting treatability
studies for determination of the effectiveness of a technology
(or combination of technologies) in remediating a CERCLA
site.

Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response. 134p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Superfund,
Remedial action, Comprehensive Environmental Response
Compensation and Liability Act.

1155 Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
CERCLA

Order Number PB93-126787CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 92
Systemicaliy conducted, well-documented treatability studies
are an important component of the removal process, remedi-
al investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) process and the re-
medial design/remedial action (RD/RA) process under the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,
and Liability Act (CERCLA). The guide describes a three-
tiered approach for conducting treatability studies that con-
sists of (1) remedy screening, (2) remedy-selection testing,
and (3) RD/RA testing.

Specifications: See also PB91-248772. 83p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment, Superfund, Remedial action.

1156 Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
CERCLA: Aerobic Biodegradation Remedy Screening

Order Number PB92-109073CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Jul 91

The fact sheet provides a summary of information to facili-
tate the planning and execution of aerobic biodegradation
remedy screening treatability studies in support of the RI/FS
and the remedial design/remedial action (RD/RA) process-
es. The fact sheet follows the organization of the 'Guide for
Conducting Treatability Studies Under CERCLA: Aerobic Bio-
degradation Remedy Screening, Interim Guidance (PB92-
109065), July 1991. Detailed information on designing and
implementing remedy screening and remedy selection treat-
ability studies for aerobic biodegradation is provided in the
guidance document. The guidance discusses only screening
of biological treatment. Remedy selection guidance for aero-
bic biodegradation is currently in the planning stages.
Specifications: See also PB92-109065 and PB90-249772.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 9p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Biodeterioration, Aerobic processes,
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Prereme-
dial actions.

1157 Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
CERCLA: Aerobic Biodegradation Remedy Screening.
Interim Guidance

Order Number PB92-109065CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 91
Systematically conducted, well-documented treatability stud-
ies are an important component of remedy evaluation and
selection under the Superfund program. The manual focuses
on aerobic biodegradation remedy screening treatability stud-
ies conducted in support of remedy selection that is conduct-
ed prior to the Record of Decision (ROD). The manual pre-
sents a standard guide for designing and implementing an

215

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Treatability Studies

aerobic biodegradation remedy screening treatability study.
The manual presents a description of and discusses the ap-
plicability and limitations of aerobic biodegradation technol-
ogies and defines the prescreening and field measurement
data needed to determine if treatability testing is required. It
also presents an overview of the process of conducting
treatability tests and the applicability of tiered treatability test-
ing for evaluation aerobic biodegradation technologies. The
specific goals of each tier of testing are defined and perform-
ance levels are presented that should be met at the remedy
screening level before additional tests are conducted at the
next tier. The elements of a treatability study work plan are
also defined with detailed discussions on the design and
execution of the remedy screening treatability study.
Specifications: See also PB90-249772 and PB92-109073.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. 43p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Biodeterioration, Aerobic processes,
Preremedial actions.

1158 Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
CERCLA: Aerobic Biodegradation Remedy Screening.
Quick Reference Fact Sheet

Order Number PB92-224377CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Jul 91
The fact sheet provides a summary of information to facili-
tate the planning and execution of aerobic biodegradation
remedy screening treatability studies in support of the reme-
dial investigation/feasibility study (Rl/FS) and the remedial
design/remedial action (RD/RA) processes. This fact sheet
follows the organization of the 'Guide for Conducting Treat-
ability Studies Under CERCLA: Aerobic Biodegradation
Remedy Screening, Interim Guidance,' EPA/540/2-91 /013A,
July 1991. Detailed information on designing and implement-
ing remedy screening and remedy selection treatability stud-
ies for aerobic biodegradation is provided in the guidance
document. This guidance discusses only screening of biologi-
cal treatment. Remedy selection guidance for aerobic biode-
gradation is currently in the planning stages.

Specifications: See also PB92-109065. 9p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Aerobic processes, Biodeterioration,
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

1159 Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
CERCLA: Biodegradation Remedy Selection. Interim
Guidance

Order Number PB94-117470CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01 '
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response: 1993
The primary purpose of the guide is to provide standard guid-
ance for designing and implementing a biodegradation treat-
ability study in support of remedy selection testing. Addition-
ally, it describes a three-tiered approach that consists of (1)
remedy screening testing, (2) remedy selection testing, and
(3) remedial design/remedial action testing. It also presents
a guide for conducting treatability studies in a systematic and
stepwise fashion for determination of the effectiveness of
biodegradation in remediating a site. The intended audience
for the guide includes Remedial Project Managers, On-Scene

Coordinators, Potentially Responsible Parties, consultants,
contractors, and technology vendors.

Specifications: See also PB93-126787. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response. 85p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Bioremediation.

1160 Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
CERCLA: Biodegradation Remedy Selection. Quick
Reference Fact Sheet

Order Number PB94-144136CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Aug 93
This fact sheet provides a summary of information to facili-
tate the planning and execution of biodegradation remedy
selection treatability studies in support of the remedial inves-
tigation/feasibility study (Rl/FS) and the remedial design/re-
medial action (RD/RA) processes. It is intended to provide
Remedial Project Managers (RPMs), On Scene Coordinators
(OSCs), Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs), and other in-
terested persons with enough information to determine
whether biodegradation treatability studies may be consid-
ered in the remedy selection phase of the Rl/FS for the
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and
Liability Act (CERCLA) site of interest. This fact sheet follows
the organization of the 'Guide for Conducting Treatability
Studies Under CERCLA: Biodegradation Remedy Selection,
'EPA/540/R-93/514A', 1993. Detailed information on design-
ing and implementing remedy selection treatability studies for
biodegradation is provided in the guidance document.
Specifications: See also PB94-117470.11 p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Biodeterioration, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response.

1161 Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
CERCLA: Chemical Dehaiogenation

Order Number PB92-169044CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
IT Corp., Sharonville, OH.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; May 92
Systematically conducted, well-documented treatability stud-
ies are an important component of the remedial investiga-
tion/feasibility study (Rl/FS) process and the remedial
design/remedial action (RD/RA) process under the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liabil-
ity Act (CERCLA). The guide, which presents information on
treatability studies involving chemical dehaiogenation of soils
and sludges, is intended to supplement the information in the
final generic guide. The guide describes a three-tiered ap-
proach for conducting treatability studies, which consists of
(1) remedy screening, (2) remedy selection, and (3) remedial
design/remedial action. The purpose of remedy-screening
studies for chemical dehaiogenation technologies is to deter-
mine if the technology is chemically feasible for the contami-
nants/matrix of concern. The guide also presents detailed,
technology-specific information on the preparation of a Work
Plan and a Sampling and Analysis Plan for chemical dehaio-
genation treatability studies. Elements discussed include test
objectives, experimental design and procedures, equipment
and materials, sampling and analysis procedures, quality as-
surance/quality control procedures, and data analysis and in-
terpretation.

216

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Treatability Studies

Specifications: See also PB92-169275 and PB91-228031.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 80p.

Subject index keywords: Waste management, Superfund,
Environmental surveys, Hazardous materials, Chemical treat-
ment, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

1162 Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
CERCLA: Chemical Dehaiogenation. Final Report

Order Number PB92-231307CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
IT Corp., Sharonville, OH.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; May 92
Systematically conducted, well-documented treatability stud-
ies are an important component of the remedial investiga-
tion/feasibility study (RI/FS) process and the remedial
design/remedial action (RD/RA) process under the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liabil-
ity Act (CERCLA). The guide describes a three-tiered ap-
proach for conducting treatability studies, which consists of
(1) remedy screening, (2) remedy selection, and (3) remedial
design/remedial action. The purpose of remedy-screening
studies for chemical dehaiogenation technologies is to deter-
mine if the technology is chemically feasible for the contami-
nants/matrix of concern. Remedial design/remedial action
studies, which are performed post-ROD, provide detailed
design and operating data necessary to scale up and imple-
ment the technology.

Specifications: See also PB92-169044, Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 81 p.

Subject index keywords: Waste management, Hazardous
materials, Superfund.

1163 Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
CERCLA: Soil Vapor Extraction. Interim Guidance

Order Number PB92-227271CDH, price; PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
Section 121(b) of the Comprehensive Environmental Re-
sponse, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA)
mandates the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
to select remedies that 'utilize permanent solutions and alter-
native treatment technologies or resource recovery technol-
ogies to the maximum extent practicable'. Treatability studies
conducted during the RI/FS phase indicate whether a given
technology can meet the expected cleanup goals for the site.
The document refers to three levels or tiers of treatability
studies: remedy screening, remedy selection, and remedy
design.

Specifications: See also PB92-224401. 83p.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Recovery,

Waste treatment, Soils.

1164 Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
CERCLA: Soil Vapor Extraction. Quick Reference Fact
Sh66t

Order Number PB92-224401CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 91
The fact sheet provides a summary of information to facili-
tate the planning and execution of soil vapor extraction
(SVE) remedy screening and remedy selection treatability
studies in support of"the remedial investigation/feasibility
study (RI/FS) and the remedial design/remedial action (RD/

RA) processes. Detailed information on designing and imple-
menting remedy screening and remedy selection treatability
studies for SVE is provided in the 'Guide for Conducting
Treatability Studies Under CERCLA: Soil Vapor Extraction,'
Interim Guidance, EPA/540/2-91 /019A, September 1991.
Specifications; 10p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Soil vapor extraction.

1165 Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
CERCLA: Soil Washing. Interim Guidance

Order Number PB92-170570CDH, price; PC A03/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 91

Systematically conducted, well-documented treatability stud-
ies are an important component of the remedial investiga-
tion/feasibility study (RI/FS) process and the remedial
design/remedial action (RD/RA) process under the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act (CERCLA). The studies provide valuable site-specific
data necessary to aid in the selection and implementation of
the remedy. The manual focuses on soil washing treatability
studies conducted in support of remedy selection prior to de-
veloping the Record of Decision. The manual presents guid-
ance for designing and implementing a soil washing treatabil-
ity study. The manual gives an overview of general informa-
tion for determining whether soil washing technology may be
effective guidance in designing and conducting soil washing
treatability studies for remedy selection, assistance In inter-
preting data obtained from remedy selection treatability stud-
ies, and guidance to estimate costs associated with remedy
design and full-scale soil washing remedial action. The
manual is not intended to serve as a substitute for communi-
cation with reports or regulators nor as the sole basis for the
selection of soil washing as a particular remediation technol-
ogy. Soil washing must be used in conjunction with other
treatment technologies since it generates residuals. The
manual is designed to be used in conjunction with the Guide
for Conducting Treatability Studies Under CERCLA; Interim
Final.

Specifications: See also PB89-132674, PB89-212757 and
PB90-249772. Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
47 p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action, Land
pollution control, Soil treatment, Comprehensive Environmen-
tal Response Compensation and Liability Act, Soil washing.

1166 Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
CERCLA: Soil Washing: Quick Reference Fact Sheet

Order Number PB92-170588CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 91

The fact sheet provides a summary of information to facili-
tate the planning and execution of soil washing remedy se-
lection treatability studies in support of the RI/FS and the re-
medial design/remedial action (RD/RA) processes. The fact
sheet follows the organization of the 'Guide for the 'Conduct-
ing Treatability Studies Under CERCLA: Soil Washing,' Inter-
im Guidance, (PB92-170570) September 1991. Detailed infor-

217

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Treatability Studies

mation on designing and implementing remedy selection
treatability studies tor soil washing is provided in the guid-
ance document.

Specifications: See also PB92-170570. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 9p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action, Land
pollution control, Soil treatment, Comprehensive Environmen-
tal Response Compensation and Liability Act, Soil washing,
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

1167 Guide tor Conducting Treatability Studies under
CERCLA Solvent Extraction. Interim Guidance

Order Number PB92-239581CDH, price; PC A03/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Aug 92
Systematically conducted, well-documented treatability stud-
ies are an Important component of remedy evaluation and
selection under the Superfund program. This manual focuses
on solvent extraction treatability studies. This manual pre-
sents a standard guide for designing and implementing sol-
vent extraction treatability studies. The manual presents a
description of and discusses the applicability and limitations
of solvent extraction technologies and defines the prescreen-
ing and field measurement data needed to determine if treat-
ability testing is required. It also presents an overview of the
process of conducting treatability tests and the applicability
of tiered treatability testing for evaluation solvent extraction
technologies. The specific goals of each tier of testing are
defined and performance levels are presented that should be
met at the remedy screening level before additional tests are
conducted at the next tier.

Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
47p,

Subject index keywords: Waste management, Hazardous
materials, Superfund, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

1168 Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
CERCLA: Solvent Extraction Quick Reference Fact Sheet

Order Number PB92-239599CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Aug 92

Systematically conducted, well-documented treatability stud-
ies are an important component of remedy evaluation and
selection under the Superfund Program. This fact sheet fo-
cuses on solvent extraction treatability studies, and is a
highly abridged version of the guide which bears the same
title. This fact sheet presents an abbreviated guide for de-
signing and implementing solvent extraction treatability stud-
ies. The fact sheet presents a description of and discusses
the applicability and limitations of solvent extraction technol-
ogies and defines the prescreening and field measurement
data needed to determine if treatability testing is required.
Specifications: See also PB92-239581. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 9p.

Subject index keywords: Waste management, Hazardous
materials, Superfund, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

1169 Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
CERCLA: Thermal Desorption Quick Reference Fact
Sheet

Order Number PB93-121325CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 92
Systematically conducted, well documented treatability stud-
ies are an important component of remedy evaluation and
selection under the Superfund program. This fact sheet fo-
cuses on thermal desorption remedy selection treatability
studies conducted in support of remedy selection that is con-
ducted prior to the Record of Decision (ROD). This fact
sheet presents a brief overview of how to design and imple-
ment a thermal desorption remedy screening treatability
study. It also discusses the applicability of tiered treatability
testing for evaluation of thermal desorption technologies.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 9p.
Subject Index keywords: Waste management, Superfund,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

1170 Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies under
CERCLA: Thermal Desorption Remedy Selection. Interim
Guidance

Order Number PB93-126597CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 92

Systematically conducted, well-documented treatability stud-
ies are an important component of remedy evaluation and
selection under the Superfund program. The manual focuses
on thermal desorption remedy selection treatability studies
conducted in support of remedy selection that is conducted
prior to the Record of Decision (ROD). The manual presents
a standard guide for designing and implementing a thermal
desorption remedy selection treatability study. The manual
presents a description of and discusses and defines the pre-
screening and field measurement data needed to determine
if treatability testing is required. It also presents an overview
of the process of conducting treatability tests and the appli-
cability of tiered treatability testing for evaluation of thermal
desorption technologies. The specific goals of each tier of
testing are defined and performance levels are presented
that should be met at the remedy screening level before ad-
ditional tests are conducted at the next tier. The elements of
a treatability study work plan are also defined with detailed
discussions on the design and execution of the remedy
screening treatability study.

Specifications: See also PB93-121325. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 47p.

Subject index keywords: Heat treatment, Superfund, Re-
medial action, Waste management, Organic compounds,
Thermal desorption.

218

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: 103(c)

1171 Inventory of Treatability Study Vendors. Volume 1

Order Number PB91-228395CDH, price; PC A14/MF A03
PE1 Associates, Inc., Arlington, VA.; Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response; Mar 90

The document was developed to facilitate the performance
of treatability studies by ensuring that requests for proposals
(RFPs) for treatability studies are made available to the
broadest subset of contractors who can perform such stud-
ies. The listing is not a pre-quallflcation of contractors and all
RFPs must be done in accordance with the Federal Acquisi-
tions Regulations. The information contained in the inventory
has been organized into two volumes. Volume I provides list-
ings of treatability study vendors organized by technology
and contaminant groups. The intended users of the docu-
ment are Superfund remedial project managers and contrac-
tors who are involved in a procurement process to obtain a
treatability study. Volume II provides vendor specific informa-
tion, i.e., permit status and scale of studies conducted. The
information can be obtained by contacting the vendors identi-
fied in Volume I. Volume II is not available. Both Volume I
and II are being updated.

Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response. 302p,

Subject index keywords; Hazardous materials, Remedial
action, Waste treatment, Superfund, Vendors.

1172 Treatability Studies Under CERCLA: An Overview

Order Number PB90-273970CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 89
The fact sheet provides a synopsis of information to facilitate
the planning and execution of treatability studies in support
of the RI/FS and the RD/RA processes.

Specifications: 8p.

Subject index keywords; Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment, Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response, Comprehensive Environmental
Response Compensation and Liability Act.

PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION; 103(c)

1173 Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Required
Under Section 103(c) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Act (CERCLA) of 1980

Order Number PB82-213984CDH, price; PCS351.00
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Mar 82
Specifications: Set includes PB82-213992 through PB82-
214081, 3180p-in 10v.

1174 Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Required
Under Section 103(c) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Act (CERCLA) of 1980; EPA Region 1

Order Number PB82-213992CDH, price: PC A08/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Mar 82
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
tion, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980 PL 96-510 {com-
monly known as Superfund) mandates in Section 103(c) that
certain persons notify the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) by June 9, 1981 of the existence of sites

where hazardous wastes from industries, businesses, gov-
ernment, hospitals, and other sources are stored, treated or
disposed of. This document comprises a listing of 8,755 noti-
fications of hazardous waste sites. For each notification, the
listing summarizes the location, the persons required to
notify, the amount and type of any hazardous waste to be
found on the site reported, and any known or suspected re-
leases of hazardous wastes. The CERCLA 103(c) notification
was mandated to help EPA and State and local governments
remedy problems created by uncontrolled hazardous waste
disposal. This document contains ten volumes, one for each
EPA region. Within each volume, the notifications are pre-
sented alphabetically by state and site name within each
state, respectively.

Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC E99,
PB82-213984. See also PB82-214008. 170p.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Comprehensive environmental response, Toxic sub-
stances, EPA region 1.

1175 Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Required
Under Section 103(c) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Act (CERCLA) of 1980: EPA Region 2

Order Number PB82-214008CDH, price: PC A14/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Mar 82
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
tion, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980 PL 96-510 (com-
monly known as Superfund) mandates in Section 103(c) that
certain persons notify the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) by June 9, 1981 of the existence of sites
where hazardous wastes from industries, businesses, gov-
ernment, hospitals, and other sources are stored, treated or
disposed of. This document comprises a listing of 8,755 noti-
fications of hazardous waste sites. For each notification, the
listing summarizes the location, the persons required to
notify, the amount and type of any hazardous waste to be
found on the site reported, and any known or suspected re-
leases of hazardous wastes. The CERCLA 103(c) notification
was mandated to help EPA and State and local governments
remedy problems created by uncontrolled hazardous waste
disposal. This document contains ten volumes, one for each
EPA region. Within each volume, the notifications are pre-
sented alphabetically by state and site name within each
state, respectively.

Specifications; Also available in set of 10 reports PC E99,
PB82-213984. See also PB82-213992, and PB82-214016.
311 p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Comprehensive environmental response, Toxic sub-
stances, EPA region 2.

1176 Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Required
Under Section 103(c) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Act (CERCLA) of 1980: EPA Region 3

Order Number PB82-214016CDH, price: PC A16/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Mar 82
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
tion, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980 PL 96-510 (com-
monly known as Superfund) mandates in Section 103(c) that
certain persons notify the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) by June 9, 1981 of the existence of sites

219

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: 103(c)

Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC E99,
PB82-213984. See also PB82-214008, and PB82-214024.
367p,

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Comprehensive environmental response, Toxic sub-
stances, EPA region 3.

1177 Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Required
Under Section 103(c) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Act (CERCLA) ot 1980: EPA Region 4

Order Number PB82-214024CDH, price: PC A2Q/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Mar 82
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
tion, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980 PL 96-510 (com-
monly known as Superfund) mandates in Section 103(c) that
certain persons notify the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) by June 9, 1981 of the existence of sites
where hazardous wastes from industries, businesses, gov-
ernment, hospitals, and other sources are stored, treated or
disposed of. This document comprises a listing of 8,755 noti-
fications of hazardous waste sites. For each notification, the
listing summarizes the location, the persons required to
notify, the amount and type of any hazardous waste to be
found on the site reported, and any known or suspected re-
leases of hazardous wastes. The CERCLA 103(c) notification
was mandated to help EPA and State and local governments
remedy problems created by uncontrolled hazardous waste
disposal. This document contains ten volumes, one for each
EPA region. Within each volume, the notifications are pre-
sented alphabetically by state and site name within each
state, respectively.

Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC E99,
PB82-213984. See also PB82-214016, and PB82-214032.

474p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Comprehensive environmental response, Toxic sub-
stances, EPA region 4.

1178 Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Required
Under Section 103(c) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Act (CERCLA) of 1980: EPA Region 5

Order Number PB82-214032CDH, price: PCS84.00
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Mar 82
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
tion, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980 PL 96-510 (com-
monly known as Superfund) mandates in Section 103(c) that
certain persons notify the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) by June 9, 1981 of the existence of sites

where hazardous wastes from industries, businesses, gov-
ernment, hospitals, and other sources are stored, treated or
disposed of. This document comprises a listing of 8,755 noti-
fications of hazardous waste sites. For each notification, the
listing summarizes the location, the persons required to
notify, the amount and type of any hazardous waste to be
found on the site reported, and any known or suspected re-
leases of hazardous wastes. The CERCLA 103 (c) notifica-
tion was mandated to help EPA and State and local govern-
ments remedy problems created by uncontrolled hazardous
waste disposal. This document contains ten volumes, onefor
each EPA region. Within each volume, the notifications are
presented alphabetically by state and site name within each
state, respectively.

Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC E99,
PB82-213984. See also PB82-214024, and PB82-214040.
Portions of this document are not fully legible. 719p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Comprehensive environmental response, Toxic sub-
stances, EPA region 5.

1179 Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Required
Under Section 103(c) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Act (CERCLA) of 1980: EPA Region 6

Order Number PB82-214040CDH, price; PC A17/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Mar 82
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
tion, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980 PL 96-510 (com-
monly known as Superfund) mandates In Section 103(c) that
certain persons notify the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) by June 9, 1981 of the existence of sites
where hazardous wastes from industries, businesses, gov-
ernment, hospitals, and other sources are stored, treated or
disposed of. This document comprises a listing of 8,755 noti-
fications of hazardous waste sites. For each notification, the
listing summarizes the location, the persons required to
notify, the amount and type of any hazardous waste to be
found on the site reported, and any known or suspected re-
leases of hazardous wastes. The CERCLA 103(c) notification
was mandated to help EPA and State and local governments
remedy problems created by uncontrolled hazardous waste
disposal, This document contains ten volumes, one for each
EPA region. Within each volume, the notifications are pre-
sented alphabetically by state and site name within each
state, respectively.

Specifications: Also available in set of 10 reports PC E99,
PB82-213984. See also PB82-214032, and PB82-214057.
Portions of this document are not fully legible. 379p,

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Comprehensive environmental response, Toxic sub-
stances, EPA region 6.

1180 Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Required
Under Section 103(c) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Act (CERCLA) of 1980: EPA Region 7

Order Number PB82-214057CDH, price: PC A10/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Mar 82
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensa-
tion, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980 PL 96-510 (com-
monly known as Superfund) mandates in Section 103(c) that
certain persons notify the U.S. Environmental Protection

220

-------
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: 103
-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:

Conference Proceedings

TECHNOLOGY POLICY &
ADMINISTRATION: Conference
Proceedings

1184 Annual RREL Research Symposium (20th) Abstract
Proceedings. Held in Cincinnati, Ohio on March 15-17,
1994

Order Number PB94-159092CDH, price: PC A12/MF A03
Science Applications International Corp., Fort Washington,
PA.; Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Mar 94

The Twentieth Annua! Risk Reduction Engineering Laborato-
ry (RREL) Research Symposium was held in Cincinnati, Ohio,
March 15-17, 1994. The purpose of this Symposium was to
present the latest significant research findings from ongoing
and recently completed projects funded by the Risk Reduc-
tion Engineering Laboratory. These Proceedings are orga-
nized into two sections. Part One contains extended ab-
stracts of the paper presentations. Part Two contains ab-
stracts of the poster displays. Subjects include pollution pre-
vention demonstrations and life cycle analysis; remediation
technologies from the SITE Program, RREL technologies,
and oil spills remediation technologies; drinking water and
wastewater technologies; municipal solid waste technologies;
and hazardous waste technologies.

Specifications: See also PB92-166859. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 255p.

Subject index keywords; Hazardous materials, Waste man-
agement, Meetings.

TECHNOLOGY POLICY &
ADMINISTRATION: Electronic Tools

1185 Accessing Federal Data Bases for Contaminated
Site Clean-Up Technologies (Third Edition)

Order Number PB94-144540CDH, price: PC A03/MF AG1
Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Technology Innovation Office; Oct 93

Table of Contents: Alternative Treatment Technology Infor-
mation Center (ATTIC); Case Study Data System; Cleanup
Information Bulletin Board System (CLU-IN); Cost of Remedi-
al Action (CORA) Model; Defense Environmental Electronic
Bulletin Board System (DEEBBS); Defense RDT&E Online
System (DROLS); Energy Science and Technology Data
Base; Environmental Technical Information System (ETIS);
Environmental Technologies Remedial Actions Data Ex-
change (EnviroTRADE); Environmental Technology Informa-
tion System (TIS); Hazardous Waste Superfund Collection
Data Base (HWSFD); Installation Restoration Data Manage-
ment Information System; National Technical Information
Service (NTIS) Bibliographic Data Base; New Technology
from DOE (NTD); Prospective Technology (ProTech) and the
Technology Catalogue; Records of Decision System (RODS);
ReOpt: Electronic Encyclopedia of Remedial Action Options;
Research in Progress (RIP) Data Base; RREL Treatability
Data Base; Soil Transport and Fate Data Base; Technology
Integration System Support (TISS); Vendor Information

System for innovative Treatment Technologies (VISITT); and
Waste Management Information System.

Specifications: Supersedes PB93-145647, Sponsored by
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Technol-
ogy Innovation Office. 48p.

Subject index keywords: Waste management, Technology
innovation, Pollution control.

TECHNOLOGY POLICY &
ADMINISTRATION: Miscellaneous
Policy & Program Documents

1186 Abstract Proceedings: Forum on Innovative
Hazardous Waste Treatment Technologies; Domestic
and International (2nd). Held in Philadelphia,

Pennsylvania on May 15-17, 1990

Order Number PB91-145649CDH, price: PC AG4/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Contents: Physical Chemical Treatment Methods; Thermal
Treatment; Biological Treatment; Solidification/Stabilization
Treatment; and Poster Presentations.

Specifications: Also available from Supt of Docs. 65p.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment, Meetings.

1187 Abstract Proceedings: Superfund Technical Support
Project General Meeting, Held In Athens, Georgia on
December 3-6,1990

Order Number PB93-205862CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Management Support, Silver Spring, MD.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 91
Contents: RCRA's New Ground-Water Monitoring Regula-
tions; Remedial Response Construction Cost Estimating
System (RACES); The Data Base Analyzer and Parameter
Estimator (DBAPE); Superfund Technical Liaison Program;
Causes and Effects of Well Turbidity; Characterizing Hetero-
geneous Hazardous Wastes; Superfund Innovative Technolo-
gy Evaluation (SITE) Program; Computer-Aided Assessment
of Contaminated Sites; Remedy Screening; New Engineering
Forum Issue Papers; Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrosco-
py (FT-IR); Metal Partitioning From Incineration of Soils and
Debris; Treatability Assistance Program Update; Data Gaps
in Remedial Design; The Pre-Design Technical Summary;
Remedial Design Schedule Management; Fate Constants
and Pathway Analysis; Identification of non-Target Analytes;
Dense Non-Aqueous Phase Liquids; MINTEQA2 Geochemi-
cal Equilibrium Model; Corps of Engineers Laboratory Sup-
port to EPA Regions; Subsurface Characterization and Mobi-
lization Processes (SCAMP); Overview of Athens' Modeling
Capabilities; Predicting Chemical Reactivity by Computer; Ra-
diation Technical Support to Regional Superfund Programs;
Design of Groundwater Monitoring Networks.

Specifications: See also PB92-205657. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response. 40p.

Subject index keywords: Meetings, Superfund, Waste man-
agement, Water pollution, Hazardous materials.

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents

1188 Accessing Federal Data Bases for Contaminated
Site Clean-Up Technologies

Order Number PB91-921288CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 91
The document is a reference tool that provides information
on those systems maintaining data on remedial technologies.
It may be used by Project Managers as a pointer to reposi-
tories of technical information, or as a source of contacts
that may be useful to future system design. Each data base
profile contains information on specific data elements,
system uses, hardware and software requirements, and
access. The profiles also include Agency contacts for each
system should more detailed information be required.
Specifications; Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 29p,

Subject index keywords: Sites, Hazardous materials, Data
aquisition, Pollution control, Superfund.

1189 Accessing Federal Data Bases for Contaminated
Site Clean-Up Technologies (Second Ectttion)

Order Number PB93-145647CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Technology Innovation Office; Aug 92
The Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable devel-
oped this publication to provide information on accessing
Federal data bases that contain data on innovative remedi-
ation technologies. This document updates and expands in-
formation presented in the first edition published in 1991.
This document is a reference tool that provides information
on those systems maintaining data on remedial technologies.
It may be used by project managers as a pointer to reposi-
tories of technical information, or as a source of contacts
that may be useful to future system design. Each data base
profile contains information on data elements, system uses,
hardware and software requirements, and access. The pro-
files also contain contacts for each system, A matrix showing
system characteristics of the data bases included in this doc-
ument is provided.

Specifications: See also PB91-921288. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Technology
Innovation Office. 52p.

Subject index keywords: Remedial action, Technology in-
novation, Information systems, Waste management. Data
bases, Cleanup operations.

1190 Accutech Pneumatic Fracturing Extraction and Hot
Gas Injection, Phase 1. Applications Analysis Report

Order Number PB94-117439CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Hackensack, NJ.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 93
The report summarizes and analyzes the SITE demonstration
of Accutech's Pneumatic Fracturing Extraction (PFE) process
at an industrial park in NJ. Based on the results of 4-hr tests
before and after fracturing, extracted air Wow rate increased
an average 600% and trichloroethene (TCE) mass removal
rate increased about 675%, primarily due to the increased air
flow. The radius for effective vapor extraction also Is en-
larged by fracturing; extracted air flow rates increased 700%
to 1,400% in wells at a 10 ft radius and 200% to 1,100% in

wells 20 ft from the fracture well. With passive air inlets, the
extracted air flow rate increased about 19,500%, and TCE
mass removal rate increased 2,300%. The estimated cost for
full-scale remediation of the site With PFE was $307/kg
(5140/lb) of TCE removed based on the SITE demonstration
experience and information provided by the developer. Major
contributing factors were: Labor (29%): Capital Equipment
(22); and Emissions Collection/disposal (19%). Numerous
assumptions were used in arriving at this cost. Results of two
Hot Gas Injection (HGI) tests were inconclusive.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response. 59p.

Subject index keywords: Pneumatic fracturing extraction,
Gas injection, Superfund, Trichlo roc thy lane, Superfund Inno-
vative Technology Evaluation.

1191 Advancing the Use of Treatment Technologies for
Superfund Remedies

Order Number PB90-272659CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 21 Feb 89
The directive reaffirms the use of treatment technologies at
Superfund sites and summarizes guidance documents and
activities that encourage and support the use of innovative
treatment technologies.

Specifications: 10p,

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment, Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response, Remedial action.

1192 Alternating Current Electrocoagulation for
Superfund Site Remediation

Order Number PB93-205144CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Electro-Pure Systems, Inc., Amherst, NY.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab; c1993

The technical and economical feasibility of alternating current
electrocoagulation (ACE) was evaluated for a 2-year period.
ACE is an electrochemical technology where highly-charged
aluminum polyhydroxide species are introduced into aqueous
media for the removal of suspended solids, oil droplets, and
soluble ionic pollutants. ACE can break stable aqueous col-
loidal suspensions of up to 10% total solids and stable emul-
sions containing up to 5% oil. Major operating parameters
have been defined for different classes of effluents based on
experimental results using complex synthetic soil slurries and
metals. Test results indicate that ACE produces aqueous and
solid separations comparable to those produced by chemical
flocculent additions, but with reduced filtration times and
sludge volumes. The technology has application where re-
moval of soluble and suspended pollutants from effluents is
required, and in the recovery of fine-grained products from
process streams. The technology however, has not yet been
demonstrated at full-scale for Superfund site remediation.
Summarized are the principal results of the SITE research
program and results of ACE treatment on some different
classes of industrial effluents, not part of the SITE Program.
Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of Air and Waste Management
Association, 1993. See also PB-143 652. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 8p.

223

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents

Subject index keywords; Electrocoagulation, Hazardous
materials, Waste treatment,

1193 American Combustion Pyretron Destruction System.
Applications Analysis Report

Order Number P390-258427CDH, price; PC A04/MF A01
Acurex Corp., Jefferson, AR.; Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH, Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; Jun
89

The report analyzes American Combustion's Pyretron oxygen
enhanced burner system. The report discusses information
on the economical advantages of this type of incineration for
use in assessments at uncontrolled hazardous waste sites.
Specifications: See also PB89-167894. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 54p.

Subject index keywords: Incinerators, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials, Kilns, Superfund program, Remedial action.

1194 Application of a Plant Test System in the
Identification of Potential Genetic Hazards at Chemical
Waste Sites

Order Number PB92-124551CDH, price: PC A03/MF AOt
Health Effects Research Lab., Research Triangle Park, NC.
Genetic Toxicology Div. Environmental Health Research and
Testing, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; 1991
The authors utilized the Tradescantia micronucleus (Trad-
MCN) assay for evaluating genetic hazards at a chemical
waste site contaminated with agricultural insecticides sched-
uled for clean-up under the Superfund program. The chemi-
cal analysis of soil samples from the site indicates presence
of lindane (17 rng/kg), beta BHC (13 mg/kg), and heptachlor
(0.4 mg/kg) in the subsurface sample, Tradescantia plants
were planted at five locations to evaluate the mutagenic ef-
fects of the total environment, i.e., soil, water, and air. In ad-
dition, stem cuttings were also placed at these locations to
sample the genetic impact of vapor phase organics in the at-
mosphere. The surface and subsurface samples were ob-
tained from these locations for their chemical and biological
analysis in the laboratory. The results of the Tradescantia
planted on the site, as well as the stem cuttings exposed on
the test site, showed significantly higher frequencies of mi-
cronuclei from contaminated plots before remediation; but no
genetic activity was detected after the remedial action. The
plants exposed to the soil samples in the laboratory yielded
nonsignificant results except for one subsurface sample
before remediation and two surface samples after remedi-
ation.

Specifications: Pub. in American Society for Testing and
Materials - Plants for Toxicity Assessment: Philadelphia, PA.,
pp309-317 1991. Prepared in cooperation with Environmental
Health Research and Testing, Inc., Research Triangle Park,
NC. 11 p.

Subject index keywords: Toxicity, Mutagens,
Plants(Botany), Chemical waste sites.

1195 Application of Tradescantia Micronucleus Assay for
In situ Evaluation of Potential Genetic Hazards from
Exposure to Chemicals at a Wood-Preserving Site

Order Number PB92-217231 CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Health Effects Research Lab,, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Genetic Toxicology Div. Environmental Health Research and
Testing, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; c1991
In situ evaluation of biological hazards from wood preserving
chemicals at a hazardous waste site using the Tradescantia
micronucleus assay (Trad-MCN) is reported In the study. The
chemical analysis of soil samples from the site showed high
contamination with arsenic (1,292 mg/kg), chromium (1,444
mg/kg) and copper (924 mg/kg) on the surface of the drip
area where wood was allowed to dry after the treatment. Ex-
posure of Tradescantia plants grown within or adjacent to
the drip area showed significantly (P=0.05) higher frequen-
cies of micronuclei when compared to plants grown in
nearby control plots. After remediation, the levels of arsenic,
chromium, and copper were substantially reduced and con-
comitantly no genotoxic activity was observed in plants
grown on-site or in plants exposed in the laboratory to a
slurry of soil samples from the site. The results from the pilot
study show that simple plant assays such as Trad-MCN can
be used as a sentinel for environmental contamination and
to assess the efficacy of clean-up efforts.

Specifications: Pub. in Hazardous Waste and Hazardous
Materials, v8 n3 p257-262 Sep 91. Prepared in cooperation
with Environmental Health Research and Testing, Inc., Re-
search Triangle Park, NC. 8p.

Subject Index keywords: Wood preservatives, Superfund,
Waste disposal, Biological effects, Bioassay, Hazardous ma-
terials.

1196 Applications Analysis Report: SITE Program, CF
Systems Organics Extraction System, New Bedford,
Massachusetts

Order Number PB91-113845CDH, price: PC AQ4/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., McLean, VA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Aug 90

The report summarizes the results of a Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation (SITE) demonstration of the CF Sys-
tems critical fluid organics extraction system at the New Bed-
ford Harbor, Mass., Superfund site. It also provides a review
of those conditions which this technology is best suited for,
as well as comments by CF Systems Corp. The technology
depends on the ability of organic pollutants to solubilize in
the process solvent, a liquified gas. The pollutants treated in-
clude polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB's) and polynuclear aro-
matic hydrocarbons.

Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
74p,

Subject index keywords: Organic compounds, Hazardous
materials, Extraction, New Bedford Harbor, Superfund.

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION;
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents

1197 Assessment of International Technologies for
Superfund Applications: Technology Review and Trip
Report Results

Order Number PB90-106428CDH, price: PC AG4/MF A01
Alliance Technologies Corp., Bedford, MA.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DG. Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response; Sep 88

Several international technologies were identified and investi-
gated for their applicability to hazardous waste site remedi-
ation in the United States. The field team visited with twelve
research groups, consultants and manufacturers at 15 loca-
tions in The Netherlands, Belgium and the Federal Republic
of Germany (FRG). Results of the individual site visits are
summarized and a capsule summary of each technology in-
cludes a brief process description, discussion of process limi-
tations, performance data, costs, and status of process de-
velopment. Identified were site cleanup technologies not cur-
rently used in the U.S., as well as unique applications of
techniques used in the U.S. Among the most important find-
ings were five different soil washing techniques in Holland
and the the FRG. Another key finding was the High Temper-
ature Slagging Incinerator technology reviewed in Belgium, In
addition, the field team reviewed unique applications of in
situ biological treatment and composting techniques, vacuum
extraction and in situ air stripping, in situ extraction of cadmi-
um from soils, application of rotating biological contractors,
and electrochemical dehalogenation techniques.
Specifications: See also PB89-205959. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response. 53p.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Technology
assessment, Waste disposal, Foreign technology, Superfund
program. Remedial action, Environmental research.

1198 Assessment of Technologies for the Remediation of
Radioactively Contaminated Superfund Sites

Order Number PB9Q-2Q414QCDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 90
The report is a screening evaluation of information needs for
the development of generic treatability studies for the reme-
diation of Superfund Radiation Sites on the National Priorities
List (NPL). It presents a categorization of the 25 radiation
sites currently proposed or listed on the NPL, and provides a
rating system for evaluating technologies that may be used
to remediate these sites. It also identifies gaps in site as-
sessment and technology data and provides information
about and recommendations for technology development.
Specifications: 116p.

Subject index keywords: Radioactive wastes, Hazardous
materials, Waste disposal, Superfund program,

1199 Assessment of Tentatively Identified Compounds In
Superfund Samples

Order Number PB9Q-253816CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Research Lab,, Athens, GA: Jun 90
Stored mass spectral data for 27 semivolatile samples ana-
lyzed by 7 private laboratories under contract with the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency were reanalyzed at the En-
vironmental Research Laboratory, Athens, GA (AERL), Re-
sults of the reanalysis were compared with the original con-
tract laboratory data. In instances where specific compound
identifications had been made by a contract laboratory,
AERL identifications agreed 36% of the time, disagreed with

the identification 11% of the time, disagreed on the presence
of the GC peak 19% of the time, or concluded that data
were insufficient for identification 34% of the time.
Specifications: 9p.

Subject index keywords: Site surveys, Hazardous materi-
als, Chemical analysis, Waste disposal, Superfund, Tentative-
ly identified compounds.

1200 Asymmetric Loss Function for Superfund
Remediation Decisions

Order Number PB93-106763CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Monitoring Systems Lab., Las Vegas, NV;

1992

At a Superfund remediation site the decision is a classifica-
tion problem, discriminating between polluted blocks to be
remediated and background blocks to be left untreated. The
concentration of the pollutant in a block is estimated from
sampling. The more samples taken the better the estimates,
but what is the optimum sample size. The errors are comput-
ed by subtracting the estimate from the block averages of an
exhaustive sampling. The time-honored least squares algo-
rithm is the obvious way to evaluate a given sample size, but
least squares assumes a symmetric loss function. Superfund
remediation has an asymmetric cost-plus-loss function; false
positives (clean blocks judged dirty) have a relatively small
fixed cost while false negative (polluted blocks judged clean)
have public-health-losses that increase with concentration.
Minimizing an asymmetric cost-plus-loss function will find a
different optimum sample size than would the traditional least
squares approach.

Specifications: See also P890-155581. 8p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action, Envi-
ronmental monitoring, Sampling, Waste management, Loss
function,

1201 AutoMOUSE: An Improvement to the MOUSE
Computerized Uncertainty Analysis System Operational
Manual

Order Number PB93-100113CDH, price: PC A10/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Aug 92
Under a mandate of national environmental laws, the agency
strives to formulate and implement actions leading to a com-
patible balance between human activities and the ability of
natural systems to support and nurture life. The Risk Reduc-
tion Engineering Laboratory is responsible for planning, im-
plementing. and managing research development, and dem-
onstration programs to provide an authoritative, defensible
engineering basis in support of the policies, programs, and
regulations of the EPA with respect to drinking water,
wastewater, pesticides, toxic substances, solid and hazard-
ous wastes, and Superfund-related activities. The publication
is one of the products of that research and provides a vital
communication link between the researcher and the user
community. The manual describes a system, called MOUSE
(for Modular Oriented Uncertainty SystEm), for dealing with
the computational problems of uncertainty, specifically in
models that consist of a set of one or more equations. Since
such models are frequently encountered in the fields of envi-
ronmental science, risk analysis, economics, and engineer-
ing, the system has broad application throughout these
fields. An Important part of the MOUSE system is Auto-
MOUSE which actually writes the computer programs re-

225

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents

quired for the uncertainty analysis computations. Thus, no
prior programming knowledge is needed to learn or use
MOUSE and, because of its transportability and compact-
ness, the system can be run on a wide variety of personal
computers available to the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency and/or its contractors and grantees.

Specifications: For system on diskette, see PB93-500007.
210p.

Subject index keywords: Environmental impact assess-
ments, Environmental engineering, Risk assessment, User
manua!s(Computer programs), AutoMOUSE system, Modular
Oriented Uncertainty System.

1202 AWD Technologies Integrated AquaDetox (Trade
Name)/SVE Technology: Applications Analysis Report

Order Number PB92-218379CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Oct 91

In support of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's
(EPA) Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE)
Program, the report evaluates the AWD Technologies, Inc.,
integrated AquaDetox/SVE treatment system for simultane-
ous on-site treatment of contaminated groundwater and soil-
gas. The AWD technology uses an AquaDetox moderate
vacuum steam stripping system to treat contaminated
groundwater and a soil vapor extraction (SVE) system that
uses granular activated carbon (GAC) beds to treat soil-gas.
The two systems are looped together to form a closed
system with no emissions. The report evaluates both the
treatment efficiency and economic data based on results
from the SITE demonstrated and describes several case
studies.

Specifications: See also PB92-124387. 68p.

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Land pollution control, Water pollution control, Hazardous
materials, AquaDetox/SVE treatment system.

1203 Babeock and Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrification.
Technology Demonstration Summary

Order Number PB93-145621CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 92

A Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Dem-
onstration of the Babcock and Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitri-
fication Technology was conducted in November 1991. This
Demonstration occurred at the Babcock and Wilcox (B and
W) Alliance Research Center (ARC) in Alliance, OH. The B
and W cyclone furnace may be used for thermal treatment of
soils contaminated with organics, metals, and radionuclides.
The cyclone furnace is designed to destroy organic contami-
nants and to immobilize metals and radionuclides in a vitri-
fied soil matrix (slag).

Specifications: See also PB92-222215, PB92-222223, and
PB93-122315. 8p.

Subject index keywords: Technology innovation, Soil treat-
ment, Hazardous materials, Vitrification, Radioactive materi-
als, Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program, B
and W cyclone furnace.

1204 Behavior of Arsenic in a Rotary Kiln Incinerator
(Journal Version)

Order Number PB92-179845CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Acurex Corp., Jefferson, AR.; Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab;
C1992

A series of pilot scale incineration tests were performed at
EPA's incineration Research Facility (IRF) to evaluate the
fate of arsenic when fed to a rotary kiln incinerator, in addi-
tion to parametric tests, an arsenic-containing soil from a Su-
perfund site was also fed to the same incinerator. The oper-
ation of the incinerator and the resulting test conditions were
similar. The data showed that arsenic when incinerated tends
to partition to the bottom ash. However, as the temperature
in the kiln rises, the amount of arsenic partitioning to the ash
decreases. With regard to the Superfund soil, the TCLP
values for arsenic went down as the oxygen level in the kiln
increased. Afterburner temperature and chlorine concentra-
tion in the waste did not appear to have any effect on the
partitioning of arsenic.

Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of Air and Waste Management
Association, v42 n2 p179-184 Feb 92. See also PB91-
131656. Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 8p.

Subject index keywords: Arsenic, Waste disposal, Inciner-
ators.

1205 BEN: A Model to Calculate the Economic Benefits of
Noncompliance. User's Manual (Revised)

Order Number PB94-141652CDH, price: PC A10/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Enforcement; Dec 93

The manual is to be used with the BEN computer model
which calculates the economic benefit a violator derives from
delaying or avoiding compliance with environmental statutes.
In general, EPA uses the BEN computer model to assist its
staff in developing settlement penalty figures. While the pri-
mary purpose of the BEN model is to calculate the after tax
net present value of a pollution prevention or mitigation
project and to calculate 'cash outs' in Superfund cases.
Specifications: Supersedes PB92 230358. 201 p.

Subject index keywords: Pollution abatement, Superfund,
Benefit cost analysis.

1206 Bibliography of Federal Reports and Publications
Describing Alternative and innovative Treatment
Technologies for Corrective Action and Site
Remediation

Order Number PB91-921293CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 91
The Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtabie devel-
oped this bibliography to publicize the accessibility of Federal
documents pertaining to innovative and alternative technol-
ogies to treat hazardous wastes. The bibliography contains
references for documents and reports from the U.S. Environ-
mental Protection Agency (EPA), the U.S. Army, the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, the U.S. Navy, the U.S. Air Force,
the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), and the U.S. Depart-
ment of Interior (DOI), Bureau of Reclamation. The publica-
tion contains references and order information for reports on
research concerning the application of innovative and alter-

226

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents

native hazardous waste treatment options. The bibliography
is scheduled to undergo periodic revisions.

Subject index keywords: Sites, Hazardous materials, Re-
search management, Bibliographies.

1207 Carver-Greenfield Process (Trade Name) Deh/dro-
Tech Corporation. Applications Analysis Report

Order Number PB93-101152CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 92
The report evaluates the Dehydro-Tech Corporation's
Carver-Greenfield (C-G) Process and focuses on the technol-
ogy's ability to separate waste mixtures into their constituent
solid, organic and water fractions while producing a solid re-
sidual that meets applicable disposal requirements. The
report presents performance and economic data from the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation (SITE) demonstration and three case
studies. The C-G Process demonstration was conducted as a
part of the SITE Program at the Risk Reduction Engineering
Laboratory's Releases Control Branch facility in Edison, New
Jersey, using drilling mud waste from the PAB Oil Superfund
site in Abbeville, Louisiana. The system generated a treated
solids product that passed Toxicity Characteristic Leaching
Procedure (TCLP) criteria for volatiles, semivolatiles and
metals. Potential wastes that might be treated by the tech-
nology include industrial residues, Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act wastes, Superfund wastes and other
wastes contaminated with organic compounds. Economic
analyses indicate that the cost of using the C-G process is
about $523/ton of which $302 is for site-specific expenses.
Specifications: See also PB92-217462. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 49p.

Subject index keywords: Waste treatment, Separation
processes, Solvent extraction, Hazardous materials, Innova-
tive treatment technologies, Carver-Greenfield process.

1208 CASHOUT Model: Calculates Current Value of
Superfund Cleanup Costs (Version 1.2) (for
Microcomputers)

Order Number PB94 501012CDH, price: D02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Enforcement; Dec 93

CASHOUT determines in current year dollars what all the
future clean-up costs of a Superfund site will be. Since those
costs could be as much as 50 years in the future, this allows
the enforcement professionals in the Superfund program to
quickly determine what the total current cost of a clean-up
would be. Then they can use that number to 'cashout' of the
case the small contributors. The small contributors just pay
an appropriate portion of the CASHOUT number, and then
they are out of the case. The other contributors usually are
responsible for the site for a substantial amount of time.
Specifications; The software is on one 3 1/2 inch diskette,
72QK double density. Documentation included; may be or-
dered separately as PB94-141678. Software valid through
August 1994 when an updated issue will be released.

System: DOS operating system. Requires 69K of hard drive
space. 1 diskette.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Costs, Software.

1209 Chemical Dehalogenation Treatability Studies under
CERCLA: An Overview

Order Number PB92-169275CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
IT Corp., Sharonville, OH.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; May 92
Systematically conducted, well-documented treatability stud-
ies are an important component of remedy evaluation and
selection under the Superfund program. The fact sheet fo-
cuses on chemical dehalogenation treatability studies con-
ducted in support of remedy selection that is conducted prior
to the Record of Decision (ROD). The fact sheet presents a
standard guide for designing and implementing a chemical
dehalogenation treatability study. The manual presents a de-
scription of and discusses the applicability and limitations of
chemical dehalogenation technologies and defines the pre-
screening and field measurement data needed to determine
if treatability testing is required. It also presents an overview
of the process of conducting treatability tests and the appli-
cability of tiered treatability testing for evaluation of chemical
dehalogenation technologies. The specific goals of each tier
of testing are defined and performance levels are presented
that should be met at the remedy screening level before ad-
ditional tests are conducted at the next tier. The elements of
a treatability study work plan are also defined with detailed
discussions on the design and execution of tie treatability
study.

Specifications: See also PB92-169044. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. iOp.

Subject Index keywords: Waste management, Environmen-
tal surveys, Hazardous materials, Superfund, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response.

1210 Chemical Dehalogenation Treatment: APEG
Treatment

Order Number PB91-228031CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
The chemical dehalogenation system discussed in the report
is alkaline metal hydroxide/polyethylene glycol (APEG) which
is applicable to aromatic halogenated compounds. The metal
hydroxide that has been most widely used for this reagent
preparation is potassium hydroxide (KOH) in conjunction with
polyethylene glycol (PEG) (typically, average molecular
weight of 400 Daltons) to form a polymeric alkoxide referred
to as KPEG. However, sodium hydroxide has also been used
in the past and most likely will find increasing use in the
future because of patent applications that have been filed for
modification to this technology. This new approach will
expand the technology's applicability and efficacy and should
reduce chemical costs by facilitating the use of less costly
sodium hydroxide. A variation of this reagent is the use of
potassium hydroxide or sodium hydroxide/tetraethylene
glycol, referred to as ATEG, that is more effective on haloge-
nated aliphatic compounds. In some KPEG reagent formula-
tions, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) is added to enhance reac-
tion rate kinetics, presumably by improving rates of extraction
of the haloaromatic contaminants. Previously developed de-

227

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents

halogenation reagents involved dispersion of metallic sodium
in oil or the use of highly reactive organosodium compounds.
The reactivity of metallic sodium and these other reagents
with water presented a serious limitation to treating many
waste matrices; therefore, these other reagents are not dis-
cussed in this bulletin and are not considered APEG proc-
esses.

Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response. 8p,

Subject index keywords: Waste treatment, Dehalogenation,
Aromatic compounds, Halogen organic compounds, Chemi-
cal treatment.

1211 Chemical Oxidation Treatment. Engineering Bulletin

Order Number PB92-180066CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 91
Oxidation destroys hazardous contaminants by chemically
converting them to nonhazardous or less toxic compounds
that are ideally more stable, less mobile, and/or inert. How-
ever, under some conditions, other hazardous compounds
may be formed. The oxidizing agents most commonly used
for the treatment of hazardous contaminants are ozone, hy-
drogen peroxide, hypochlorites, chlorine, and chlorine diox-
ide. Current research has shown the combination of these
reagents or ultraviolet (UV) light and an oxidizing agent(s)
makes the process more effective. Treatability studies are
necessary to document the applicability and performance of
chemical oxidation systems technology for a specific site.
The bulletin provides information on the technology applica-
bility, limitations, a technology description, the types of re-
siduals produced, site requirements, current performance
data, status of the technology, and sources of further infor-
mation.

Specifications: See also PB90-198177. 10p.

Subject index keywords: Oxidation, Waste treatment, Haz-
ardous materials, Remedial action, Water pollution control,
Superfund, Chemical treatment.

1212 Chemical Stabilization of Mixed Organic and Metal
Compounds. EPA SITE Program Demonstration of the
Silicate Technology Corporation Process

Order Number PB93-131787CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; c1992

In November 1990, the Silicate Technology Corporation's
(STC) proprietary process for treating soil contaminated with
toxic semivolatile organic and inorganic contaminants was
evaluated in a Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
(SITE) field demonstration at the Selma Pressure Treatment
(SPT) wood preserving site in Selma, California. The SPT site
was contaminated principally with pentachlorophenol (PCP)
and arsenic, as well as lesser amounts of chromium and
copper. Because of their importance when selecting a
remedy for the site, PCP and arsenic were identified as criti-
cal analytes to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment.
(Copyright (c) 1992 Air & Waste Management Association.)
Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of the Air and Waste Manage-
ment Association, v42 n5 p724-728 May 92. 7p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Soil treatment, Reme-
dial action, Wood preservatives, Waste treatment, Innovative
treatment technologies.

1213 Chemical Waste Management, Inc. PO*WW*ER
(Trade Name) Evaporation-Catalytic Oxidation
Technology. Technology Evaluation Report. Volume 1

Order Number PB94-160637CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Chicago, IL.;
Environmental Protection Agency,.Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 92
As part of the Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
(SITE) Program, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) demonstrated the Chemical Waste Management, Inc.
(CWM), PO*WW*ER(tm) technology. The SITE demonstra-
tion was conducted in September 1992 at CWM's Lake
Charles Treatment Center (LCTC) site in Lake Charles, Lou-
isiana. During the demonstration, the PO*WW*ER(tm)
system treated landfill leachate contaminated with volatile or-
ganic compounds (VOC), semivolatile organic compounds
(SVOC), metals, ammonia, cyanide, and other inorganic con-
taminants. SITE demonstration results show that during treat-
ment in the PO*WW*ER(tm) system, the volume of the land-
fill leachate was significantly reduced. A total solids (TS) con-
centration ratio of 32 to 1 was achieved. The SITE demon-
stration results also show that the PO*WW*ER(tm) system
effectively removed sources of toxicity such as VOCs,
SVOCs, metals, ammonia, and cyanide. Concentrations of
VOCs and SVOCs in product condensate exiting the
PO*WW*ER(tm) system were below their respective detec-
tion limits of 5 to 10 micrograms per liter (micrograms/L) and
10 to 130 micrograms/L.

Specifications: See also PB94-124658, PB91-127415 and
Volume 2, PB94-160660. Sponsored by Environmental Pro-
tection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering
Lab. I67p.

Subject index keywords: Chemical wastes, Superfund,
Waste treatment, Water pollution control, Liquid wastes,
PO'WW'ER System, Innovative treatment technologies.

1214 Chemical Waste Management, Inc. PO*WW*ER
(Trade Name) Evaporation-Catalytic Oxidation
Technology. Technology Evalutlon Report. Volume 2

Order Number PB94-160660CDH, price: PC A21/MF A04
PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Chicago, IL.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Nov 93

The PRC SITE Team conducted sampling and analysis for
the SITE demonstration of the Chemical Waste Manage-
ment, Inc. (CWM) PO*WW*ER process at the Lake Charles
Treatment Center in Carlyss, Louisiana. Samples were col-
lected on September 24, 25, 26, 28, 29, and 30, 1992.
During the first three days of sampling, the PO*WW*ER
process operated with natural (unspiked) feed waste. For the
last three days of sampling, the feed waste was spiked with
sulfate salts of cadmium, copper, nickel, iron and mercury,
and with phenol, toluene, tetrachloroethene, and methylene
chloride. This report presents results and quality assurance/
quality control (QA/QC) data for samples analyzed by Engi-
neering-Science, Inc., along with vent gas emission rate and
volumetric concentration results calculated from Ross analyt-
ical data. Analytical results are presented in Section 2.0. OA/
QC results are presented in Section 3.0. Re-extraction and
reanalysis results for brine samples are presented and dis-
cussed in Section 4.0. Appendix A contains chain of custody
forms associated with the samples, and Appendix B contains
a key to sample identification.

228

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:

Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents

Specifications: See also Volume 1, PB94-160637, Spon-
sored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 500p.

Subject Index keywords: Chemical wastes, Superfund,
Waste treatment, Liquid wastes, Water pollution sampling,
PO*WW*ER System, Innovative treatment technologies.

1215 Cleanup Information Bulletin Board System Users
Guide. (CLU-IN: Cleanup Information Bulletin Board)

Order Number PB93-194025CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Feb 93
The Cleanup Information (CLU-IN) Bulletin Board System
(BBS) is designed for hazardous waste cleanup professionals
to use for finding information about innovative technologies,
consulting with one another online, and accessing data-
bases. CLU-IN is used by those involved in the cleanup of
Superfund and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
corrective action sites, including EPA, other Federal Agency
and State personnel, consulting engineers, technology ven-
dors, remediation contractors, researchers, community
groups, and individual citizens.

Specifications: 36p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Cleanup,
Data acquisition, Telecommunications, Superfund.

1216 Comparison of a Revised Area Source Algorithm for
the Industrial Source Complex Short Term Model and
Wind Tunnel Data

Order Number PB93-226751CDH, price; PC A08/MF A02
Pacific Environmental Services, Inc., Research Triangle Park,
NC.; Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle
Park, NC. Technical Support Div; Oct 92
The report summarizes the results of comparison between a
new numerical integration algorithm for modeling area source
dispersion, as implemented in the Industrial Source Complex
Short Term (ISCST2) model using wind tunnel data collected
in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Fluid Modeling
Facility. Area sources referred to can be characterized as
low level releases with little buoyance due to either momen-
tum or temperature such as landfills or lagoons that are com-
monly found at superfund sites. The results of the analyses
show that the new ISCST2 area source algorithm predicts
the concentration distribution with relatively good accuracy,
especially for ground-level area sources. The conclusion
seems also valid for the various source shapes and orienta-
tions thus suggesting the ability of the model to accurately
depict the plume shape for complex source-receptor geome-
tries.

Specifications: See also PB93-226777 and PB92-232446.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, NC. Technical Support Div. 175p.

Subject index keywords: Air pollution dispersion, Algo-
rithms, Mathematical models.

1217 Comparison: Organic Emissions from Hazardous
Waste Incinerators versus the 1990 Toxics Release
Inventory Air Releases

Order Number PB92-206267CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; cFeb 92
Incineration is often the preferred technology for disposing of
hazardous waste and remediating Superfund sites. The ef-
fective implementation of the technology is frequently imped-

ed by strong public opposition to hazardous waste inciner-
ation (HWI). One of the reasons cited for the opposition is
the perception that the emission of organics pose an unrea-
sonable threat to human health. While numerous risk assess-
ments for these facilities has demonstrated these risks are
very low, this has not totally allayed some of the concerns. In
order to put organic emissions in perspective, the mass of
these emissions from the incineration of hazardous waste
has been estimated using 'reasonable worst-case" assump-
tions and compared to the 1990 Toxics Release Inventory
(TRI) air releases. Comparisons were made for 15 carcino-
genic organic compounds and 17 non-carcinogenic organic
compounds. Ratios for all but one of these compound-specif-
ic HWI emissions to their corresponding TRI air releases
ranged from 0.0003% to 0.746%, The total mass emissions
(121.7 tons) of ail 32 specific organics from HWIs was less
than 0.03% of the corresponding 1990 TRI air releases
(431,600 tons).

Specifications: Pub. in Jni. of the Air and Waste Manage-
ment Association, v92-42.01 pi-15. See also PB85-129492,
PB87-228508, PB92-155381 and PB92-501816. Presented at
the Annual Meeting and Exhibition (85th), Kansas City, MO.,
June 21-26, 1992. 17p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Air pollution
sampling, Incineration, Organic compounds, Waste disposal.

1218 Computer Models Used to Support Cleanup
Decision-Making at Hazardous and Radioactive Waste
Sites

Order Number PB93-183333CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Radiation and Indoor Air.; Department of Energy,

Washington, DC. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and
Safeguards; Mar 93

To identify computer models actually being used to support
decision-making at hazardous and radioactive waste sites,
EPA, DOE, and NRC jointly funded a study. The purpose was
to identify models being used for hazardous and radioactive
waste site assessment and describe and classify these
models. Approximately 550 surveys were mailed to people
engaged in cleanups at hazardous and radioactive waste
sites. Responses were received from 87. The respondents
identified 127 computer models used at EPA Superfund,
DOE and NRC sites. The models included multi-media
models, ground water models, air models, engineering
models, surface water models, geochemical models, and util-
ity models. The responses revealed that few models were
used across a large number of sites. In contrast, the results
suggested that most cleanup efforts employed site-specific
models.

Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Department of
Energy, Washington, DC., and Nuclear Regulatory Commis-
sion, Washington, DC. Office of Nuclear Material Safety and
Safeguards. 113p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Radioactive
wastes, Computer programs.

229

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents

1219 Contingency Analysis Modeling for Superfund Sites
and Other Sources

Order Number PB93-189126CDH, price: PC A13/MF A03
Science Applications International Corp., Reston, VA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,
NC. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards; Jan 93
The report provides information on contingency modeling for
a wide range of different accidental release scenarios of haz-
ardous air pollutants that might take place at Superfund and
other sites. The scenarios are used to illustrate how atmos-
pheric dispersion models, including dense gas models,
should be applied. Particular emphasis is made on the input
data that is needed for proper applications of models. Flow
charts direct the user to specific sections where various sce-
narios are discussed. A check list of items that should be
discussed before running the model is provided. Several ex-
amples are provided to specifically show how to apply the
models so as to produce a credible analysis for a particular
release scenario.

Specifications: See also PB86-245248, PB89-134340 and
PB91-141820. Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards. 291 p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Air pollution
control, Contingency planning, Waste management, Comput-
erized simulation.

1220 Control Technologies for Defunct lead Battery
Recycling Sites: Overview and Recent Developments.
Volume 3

Order Number PB92-150416CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc., Edison, NJ.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; 1992

At least 29 lead battery recycling sites are or have been
slated for investigation and possible remediation under the
Superfund program. The paper condenses information re-
garding the characteristics and remediation of these sites.
The information provided includes: (1) description of oper-
ations commonly conducted, and wastes generated; (2) tech-
nologies implemented or selected for site remediation; (3)
case studies of treatability studies on common wastes; (4)
past experience regarding the recyclability of materials found
at the sites, and (5) profiles of potentially applicable innova-
tive treatment technologies.

Specifications: Presented in International Seminar on Bat-
tery Waste Management (3rd), Deerfield, FL„ November 4-6,
1991, v3 p1-22. See also PB92-114537. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 25p.

Subject Index keywords: Waste management, Lead acid
batteries, Waste treatment, Superfund, Remedial action.

1221 Control Technologies for Remediation of
Contaminated Soil and Waste Deposits at Superfund
Lead Battery Recycling Sites

Order Number PB92-227388CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc., Edison, NJ.;

Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; c1992

The paper primarily addresses remediation of contaminated
soils and waste deposits at defunct lead-acid battery recy-
cling sites (LBRS) via immobilization and separation process-
es. Metallic lead and lead compounds are generally the prin-

cipal contaminants of concern in soils and waste deposits.
Other metals (e.g., cadmium, copper, arsenic, antimony, and
selenium) are often present at LBRS. The article is primarily
based on experience gained from: (1) Superfund site investi-
gation, removal, and remedial actions, and (2) development
and demonstration of control technologies under the Super-
fund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program. The
primary remedial options for lead contaminated soils and
waste deposits include: (1) no action, (2) off-site disposal, (3)
containment, (4) immobilization, (5) separation with resource
recovery, and (6) separation without resource recovery.
Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of the Air and Waste Manage-
ment Association, v42 n7 p970-980 Jul 92. Sponsored by
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Re-
duction Engineering Lab. 14p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Electric bat-
teries, Soils, Pollution control, Superfund.

1222 Control Technology: Estimating Innovative
Technology Costs for the SITE Program

Order Number PB91-163758CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering. Lab; c1990

The paper provides the reader with an overview of the cost
estimation approach employed by the Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program. The paper identifies
4 areas of concern which confront the cost analyst as the
question of technology cost is considered. These concerns
are then addressed through a 5 part cost methodology sub-
sequently employed on all SITE technology demonstrations.
The final section of the paper review the cost data gathered
from the first nine technology demonstrations completed and
reported on.

Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of the Air and Waste Manage-
ment Association, v4G n7 Jul 90. 7p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Cost estimates, Waste
treatment, Waste disposal, Hazardous materials, Superfund
Innovative Technology Evaluation Program.

1223 Control Technology: 1992 Update of U.S. CPA's
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE)
Emerging Technology Program

Order Number PB93-15C159CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; c1992
The Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE)
Emerging Technology Program (ETP) has encouraged and fi-
nancially supported further development of bench- and pilot-
scale testing and evaluation of innovative technologies suita-
ble for use at hazardous waste sites for five years, The ETP
was established under the Superfund Amendments and Re-
authorization Act (SARA) of 1986. The ETP complies with
the goal of the SITE Program to promote, accelerate and
make commercially available the development of alternative/
innovative treatment technologies for use at Superfund sites.
Technologies are submitted to the ETP through yearly solici-
tations for Preprosals. Facilities, equipment, data collection,
performance and development are monitored throughout the
project. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the U.S.
Air Force (USAF) are participants in the ETP. DOE has co-
funded ETP projects since 1990 and the USAF since 1991. A
primary goal of the ETP is to move developed technologies
to the field-demonstration stage. Therefore, a developer may

230

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents

be considered for participation in the SITE Demonstration
Program provided performance in the ETP indicates the
technology is field-ready for demonstration arid evaluation.
Specifications; Pub. in Jnl. of the Air and Waste Manage-
ment Association, v42 n12 p1644-1656 Dec 92. See also
PB92-224294, 14p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Technology
innovation, Waste management, Superfund Innovative Tech-
nology Evaluation Program, Innovative treatment technol-
ogies.

1224 Criteria for Choosing Indicator Species for
Ecoiogicaf Risk Assessments at Superfund Sites (90-
6402)

Order Number PB91 -204321CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
North Carolina Univ. at Chapel Hill. Dept. of Environmental
Sciences and Engineering.; Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Cooperative
Environmental Management; Dec 00
The purpose of the paper is to develop criteria for choosing
indicator species for ecological risk assessments at Super-
fund sites. The paper begins with an introduction of the indi-
cator species concept and a brief review of the indicator spe-
cies in terrestrial and aquatic environments. Criteria for
choosing species are then outlined and explained.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Cooperative Environmen-
tal Management. 57p.

Subject index keywords: Risk assessment, Superfund,
Land pollution, Indicator species, Waste disposal, Water pol-
lution effects.

1225 CWM PO*WW*ER (Trade Name) Evaporation-
Catalytic Oxidation Technology: Applications Analysis
Report

Order Number PB94-124658CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 93

This report evaluates the Chemical Waste Management, Inc.
(CWM), PO*WW*ER(TM) technology's ability to remove vola-
tile organic compounds (VOC), semivolatile organic com-
pounds (SVOC), ammonia, cyanide, metals, and other inor-
ganic contaminants from aqueous wastes. This evaluation is
based on treatment performance and cost data obtained
from the Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE)
demonstration and 11 case studies conducted by CWM. The
PO*WW*ER(TM) system reduces the volume of an aqueous
waste and catalytically oxidizes volatile contaminants. The
PO*WW*ER(TM) system consists primarily of (1) an evapo-
rator that reduces influent wastewater volume, (2) a catalytic
oxidizer that oxidizes the volatile contaminants in the vapor
stream from the evaporator, (3) a scrubber that removes acid
gases formed during oxidation, and (4) a condenser that con-
denses the vapor stream leaving the scrubber. This report
also discusses the applicability of the PO*WW*ER(TM)
system based on compliance with regulatory requirements,
implementability, short-term impact, and long-term effective-
ness. In addition, factors influencing the technology's per-
formance in meeting these criteria and evaluation limitations
are discussed.

Specifications: 75p.

Subject index keywords: Liquid wastes, Waste treatment,
Hazardous materials, Superfund, Water pollution control,
PO*WW*ER system, Innovative treatment technologies.

1226 Demonstration of a Trial Excavation at the McCoIl
Superfund Site

Order Number P893-100121CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
IT Corp., Cincinnati, OH.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; Oct 92
The project describes the trial excavation performed at the
McColl Hazardous Waste Site. Excavation at this site pre-
sents unique problems due to the high potential for release
of sulfur dioxide and volatile odorous compounds contained
in the waste. The excavation demonstration was used to
obtain information on the utilization of an enclosure and as-
sociated air treatment systems around the excavation to min-
imize air emissions and the use of foam vapor suppressants
to reduce emissions from the waste during excavation. In ad-
dition, information was obtained on processing the tar frac-
tion of this waste by mixing it with cement and fly ash. The
demonstration is documented in two reports: (1) a Technolo-
gy Evaluation Report describing the field activities and labo-
ratory results; and (2) this Applications Analysis Report,
which interprets the data and discusses the potential applica-
bility of the technology.

Specifications: See also PB92-226448. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 61 p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Air pollution control, Remedial action, Waste treatment,
Fulferton(Ca!ifornia).

1227 Demonstration of Hazardous Waste Site Treatment
Technologies

Order Number PB91-176909CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; 1989

The SITE Program is intended to accelerate the use of new
and innovative treatment processes that provide permanent
control of hazardous waste as well as evaluate innovative
measurement and monitoring techniques and pursue an
active technology transfer program. Within the SITE Pro-
gram, the Demonstration Program and the Emerging Tech-
nology Program are responsible for alternative technology
development. The SITE Demonstration Program has as its
major thrust the documentation of reliable performance and
cost information for innovative alternative technologies. The
demonstration projects identify limitations of the technology,
the need for pre- or post-treatment of wastes, applicable
wastes and waste media, potential operating problems, and
the approximate cost of applying the technology.
Specifications: Pub. in Berlin Recycling Congress Proceed-
ings, Berlin, Germany, November 1989, pt-8, 10p.

Subject Index keywords: Demonstration programs, Hazard-
ous materials, Waste treatment, Superfund Innovative Tech-
nology Evaluation.

231

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents

1228 Demonstration of MIcroftitration Technology

Order Number PB92-136936CDH, price: PC AQ2/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab,; PRC Environmental
Management, Inc., Chicago, IL; c1991
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, under the Super-
fund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) program in co-
operation with E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company, Inc.
(DuPont) and the Oberlin Filter Company (Oberlin), undertook
a field demonstration project to evaluate microvibration tech-
nology for removal of zinc and suspended solids from
wastewater. The microfiltration system utilized DuPont's
Tyvek T-980 membrane filter media in conjunction with the
Oberlin automatic pressure filter. The project was undertaken
at the Palmerton Zinc Superfund site in April, 1990. Analysis
of the treated filtrate indicated that the system removed pre-
cipitated zinc and other suspended solids at an efficiency
greater than 99.9 percent. (Copyright (c) 1991-Air and
Waste Management Association.)

Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of Air and Waste Management,
v12 p1653-1657 Dec 91. See also PB92-119023, Prepared in
cooperation with PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Chi-
cago, IL. 7p.

Subject index keywords; Water pollution control, Super-
fund, Waste treatment, Liquid wastes, Land pollution control,
Microfiltration, DuPont/Oberlin Microfiltration Treatment
System.

1229 Demonstration of Waste Treatment Technologies

Order Number PB92-179670CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; 1991

The need for long-term, permanent treatment schemes as al-
ternatives to land disposal has been highlighted by legislation
such as the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and the
Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) of
1986. SARA directed the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency to establish an 'Alternative or Innovative Treatment
Technology Research and Demonstration Program' to identi-
fy promising waste treatment technologies, assist with their
evaluation, and promote their use at Superfund sites. In re-
sponse to this directive the Superfund Innovative Technology
Evaluation (SITE) Program was formed. Twenty technology
demonstrations have been completed in the SITE Program to
date. Those completed within the past year include microfil-
tration (DuPont and the Oberlin Filter Company), waste exca-
vation and emissions control (EPA Region 9), integrated
vapor extraction and steam vacuum stripping (AWD Technol-
ogies), solidification of contaminated soil (Silicate Technology
Corporation), and flame reactor recovery of lead (Horsehead
Resource Development Company).

Specifications: Presented at the Engineering and Technolo-
gy Conference (1st) on Waste Management Technology,
Technology Transfer and Training, San Juan, PR,, April 24-
26, 1991. See also PB90-216516. 7p.

Subject index keywords: Waste treatment, Hazardous ma-
terials, Remedial action, Superfund Innovative Technology
Evaluation Program.

1230 Demonstration Projects Under the U.S. EPA
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program

Order Number PB91-176891CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; 1991

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is engaged
in an initiative called the Superfund Innovative Technology
Evaluation (SITE) program. This program offers a mechanism
for conducting joint technology demonstration/evaluation
projects between the private sector and EPA. The purpose of
the program is to provide an opportunity for developers to
demonstrate the performance of their technologies on actual
hazardous waste materials, and provide reliable and accurate
information for future cleanup activities at Superfund sites.
Currently there are 38 active projects in the Demonstration
Program. Eight of these projects involve solidification/stabili-
zation, nine concentrate on thermal processes, five are bio-
logical processes, and the remaining 16 include separation
techniques, chemical treatment, and in-place vitrification. The
paper briefly describes the active program and highlights
those demonstrations which have been completed.
Specifications: Pub. in the Annual Army Environmental Re-
search and Development Symposium (14th) Proceedings,
November 14-16, 1989, p25-32. 10p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment, Demonstration programs, Superfund Innovative Tech-
nology Evaluation Program.

1231 Development of Emerging Technologies within the
SITE Program

Order Number PB92-217322CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; 1992

The SITE Program is formed by five research programs: The
Demonstration Program, The Emerging Technology Program,
the Measurement and Monitoring Technology Development
Program, the Innovative Technology Program, and the Tech-
nology Transfer Program. The Emerging Technology (ET)
Program has been in existence for five years and has devel-
oped several innovative technologies that have shown prom-
ise in being applicable to clean-up activities related to haz-
ardous waste problems. Technologies are eligible for the ET
Program whan sufficient research data exists validating the
technologies' basic concepts. The EPA contributes funds to
support developers for one or two years. Developers are re-
sponsible for conducting research and providing additional fi-
nancial support in the cooperative research effort. Generally,
technologies are categorized into six areas: Thermal, chemi-
cal, biological, materials handling, physical, and solidification/
stabilization.

Specifications: See also PB90-249756 and PB92-150663.
Presented at the Annual Conference on Contaminated Land:
Policy, Regulation, and Technology (3rd), London, England,
February 6-7, 1992. 26p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Site sur-
veys, Superfund.

232

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents

1232 Emerging Technology Report: Metals Treatment at
Superfund Sites by Absorptive Filtration

Order Number PB93-231165CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Washington Univ., Seattle.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; Jun 93

The project evaluated an innovative approach for removing
inorganic contaminants from the liquid phase at Superfund
Sites. In the adsorptive filtration process metals are collected
by attachment to a thin layer of ferrihydrite (Iron Oxide) that
has been immobilized on the surface of sand grains. The
modification of the sand surface allows the grains to simulta-
neously adsorb soluabie heavy metals and remove particu-
late metals by filtration from a wastewater. The metals stud-
ied were Cd, Cu, and Pb present at 0.5 or 5 mg/L each, in
synthetic solutions.

Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
52p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Metals, Water pollu-
tion control.

1233 Engineering Bulletin: Landfill Covers

Order Number PB94-105426CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Feb 93

Landfill covers are used at Superfund sites to minimize sur-
face water infiltration and to prevent exposure to the waste.
In many cases, covers are used in conjunction with other
waste treatment technologies, such as slurry walls, ground-
water pump- and treat-systems, and in situ treatment. The
bulletin discusses various aspects of landfill covers, their ap-
plicability, and limitations on their use and describes innova-
tive techniques, site requirements, performance data, current
status, and sources of further information regarding the tech-
nology.

Specifications: See also PB87-119483, PB87-191656,
PB89-233480 and PB90-179664. 9p.

Subject index keywords: Landfills, Coverings, Waste dis-
posal.

1234 Engineering Bulletin: Pyrolysis Treatment

Order Number PB93-105583CDH, price; PC AQ2/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 92
The Engineering Bulletins are a series of documents that
summarize the latest information available on selected treat-
ment and site remediation technologies and related issues.
Pyrolysis is formally defined as chemical decomposition in-
duced in organic materials by heat in the absence of oxygen.
Pyrolysis is a thermal process that transforms hazardous or-
ganic materials into gaseous components and a solid residue
(coke) containing fixed carbon and ash. Upon cooling, the
gaseous components condense, leaving an oil/tar residue.
Pyrolysis is applicable to a wide range of organic wastes and
is generally not used in treating wastes consisting prinari'y of
inorganics and metals. The bulletin provides information on
the technology applicability, the types of residuals resulting
from the use of the technology, the latest performance data,
site requirements, the status of the technology, and where to
go for further information.

Specifications: 8p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Waste treatment, Pyrolysis, Hazardous materials, Soil treat-
ment.

1235 Engineering Bulletin: Slurry Walls

Order Number PB93-105575CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 92
Slurry wails are used at Superfund sites to contain the waste
or contamination and to reduce the potential of future migra-
tion of waste constituents. In many cases slurry walls are
used in conjunction with other waste treatment technologies,
such as covers and ground water pump-and-treat systems.
This bulletin discusses various aspects of slurry walis includ-
ing their applicability, limitations on their use, a description of
the technology including innovative techniques, and materials
of construction including new alternative barrier materials,
site requirements, performance data, the status Of these
methods, and sources of further information.

Specifications: 10p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Containment, Waste
treatment, Hazardous materials, Slurry walls.

1236 Engineering Bulletins: Aids to the Development of
Remedial Alternatives

Order Number PB94-1Q1797CDH, price; PC A02/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; c1991

The paper provides the background for an introduction to the
new series of EPA documents called 'Engineering Bulletins.'
Engineering Bulletins summarize the latest information avail-
able on selected waste treatment and contaminated site re-
mediation technologies and related issues. A description of
the document series is given and a summary of the informa-
tion contained in the first ten bulletins is provided.
Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of the Air and Waste Manage-
ment Association, v41 n10 p1393-1396 Oct 91. Sponsored
by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab. 6p.

Subject index keywords: Documents, Technology assess-
ment, Remedial action, Superfund.

1237 Environmental Characteristics of EPA, NRC, and
DOE Sites Contaminated with Radioactive Substances

Order Number PB93-185551CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Radiation and Indoor Air. Department of Energy, Washington,
DC. Office of Environmental Restoration. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC. Office of Nuclear Material
Safety and Safeguards; Mar 93

The U.S. EPA offices of Radiation and Indoor Air and Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, the US Department of
Energy Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Man-
agement, and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of
Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards initiated preliminary
efforts to promote the more appropriate and consistent use
of computer models in remediating sites contaminated by ra-
dioactive substances and managed by the participating fed-
eral agencies. As a baseline for these efforts, the nature and
types of problems present at these sites must be under-
stood. The report responds to this need. It presents in textu-
al, tabular, and graphical formats: a list of the 45 EPA Na-

233

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:

Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents

tional Priorities List Superfund sites and the 38 NRC Site De-
commissioning Management Plan sites containing radioactive
waste materials, the types of waste found at each site, a de-
scription of the physical form of the waste, physical charac-
teristics of the site, and demographic characteristics of the
region surrounding the site.

Specifications; See also DE90013615. Prepared In coop-
eration with Department of Energy, Washington, DC. Office
of Environmental Restoration, and Nuclear Regulatory Com-
mission, Washington, DC, Office of Nuclear Material Safety
and Safeguards. 93p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Radioactive wastes,
Radioactive contamination, Waste management

1238 Environmental Monitoring Methods index (EMMi),
Version f .0 (5 - User LAN) (for Microcomputers)

Order Number PB92-504257CDH, price: Diskette $995.00
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Science and Technology; Dec 91

EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index System
(EMM!) is art easy to use PC information data base on all
EPA-regulated substances, methods for their analysis, and
regulatory and office-based lists on which they appear. EMMI
combines rapid look-up with a user-friendly interface and
easily accessible data. The EMMI System aids in the selec-
tion of the appropriate analytical methods for environmental
monitoring studies. The EMMI database includes information
on more than 2600 substances from over 50 regulatory and
non-regulatory lists and more than 900 analytical methods.
EMMI includes substances from the Clean Water Act (CWA),
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act (CERCLA), Superfund Amendments and Reau-
thorization Act (SARA), Resource Conservation and Recov-
ery Act (RCRA), Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), and Clean
Air Act (CAA), as well as substances from other Agency and
State lists. The database provides a comprehensive cross-
reference between substances and analytical methods and
contains information on related laws and organizations and
additional databases for further information.

Specifications: The software and database are contained
on three 5 1/2 inch, 1.2M high density and three 3 1/2 inch,
1.44M high density diskettes. File format: Compressed. Doc-
umentation included: may be ordered separately as PB92-
169648. For single user, order PB92-503093, for unlimited
user LAN, order PB92-504265. System: IBM PC or compati-
ble; MS DOS operating system, 512K. Language: System 'J'
Software. System 'J* Software is included in the package.
Decompression software included. See also PB92-592290
(RCRIS), PB91-591310 (CERCLIS), and PB92-501774
(SARA). 6 diskettes.

Subject index keywords: Software, Environmental monitor-
ing, Indexes(Documentation).

1239 Environmental Monitoring Methods Index (EMMI),
Version 1.0 (for Microcomputers)

Order Number PB92-503093CDH, price: Diskette $385.00
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Science and Technology; Dec 91

tion of the appropriate analytical methods for environmental
monitoring studies. The EMMI database includes information
on more than 2600 substances from over 50 regulatory and
non-regulatory lists and more than 900 analytical methods.
EMMI includes substances from the Clean Water Act (CWA),
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act (CERCLA), Superfund Amendments and Reau-
thorization Act (SARA), Resource Conservation and Recov-
ery Act (RCRA), Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), and Clean
Air Act (CAA), as well as substances from other Agency and
State lists.

Specifications: The software and database are contained
on three 5 1/4 inch, 1.2M high density and three 3 1/2 inch,
1.44M high density diskettes. File format: Compressed. Doc-
umentation included; may be ordered separately as PB92-
169648. For 2-5 user LAN, order PB92-504257, for unlimited
user LAN, order PB92-504265. System: IBM PC or compati-
ble; MS DOS operating system, 512K. Language: System 'J'
Software. System "J' Software is included in the package.
Decompression software included. See also PB92-5922S0
(RCRIS), PB91-59131G (CERCLIS), and PB92-501774
(SARA). 6 diskettes.

Subject index keywords: Software, Environmental monitor-
ing, Indexes(Documentation).

1240 Environmental Monitoring Methods Index (EMMI),
Version 1.0 (Unlimited User LAN) (for Microcomputers)

Order Number PB92-504265CDH, price: Diskette $1995.00
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Science and Technology; Dec 91

EPA's Environmental Monitoring Methods Index System
(EMMI) is an easy to use PC information data base on all
EPA-regulated substances, methods for their analysis, and
regulatory and office-based lists on which they appear. EMMI
combines rapid look-up with a user-friendly interface and
easily accessible data. The EMMI System aids in the selec-
tion of the appropriate analytical methods for environmental
monitoring studies. The EMMI database includes information
on more than 2600 substances from over 50 regulatory and
non-regulatory lists and more than 900 analytical methods.
EMMI includes substances from the Clean Water Act (CWA),
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act (CERCLA), Superfund Amendments and Reau-
thorization Act (SARA), Resource Conservation and Recov-
ery Act (RCRA), Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), and Clean
Air Act (CAA), as well as substances from other Agency and
State lists. The database provides a comprehensive cross-
reference between substances and analytical methods and
contains information on related laws and organizations and
additional databases for further information.

Specifications: The software and database are contained
on three 5 1/4 inch, 1,2M high density and three 3 1/2 inch
1.44M high density and diskettes. File format: Compressed.
Documentation included; may be ordered separately as
PB92-169648. For single user, order number PB92-503093,
for 2-5 user LAN, order PB92-504257. System: IBM PC or
compatible; MS DOS operating system, 512K. Language;
System 'J' Software. System 'J' Software is included in the
package. Decompression software included. See also PB92-
592290 (RCRIS), PB91-591310 (CERCLIS), and PB92-
501774 (SARA). 6 diskettes.

Subject index keywords: Software, Environmental monitor-
ing.

234

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents

1241 EPA/Navy CERCLA Remedial Action Technology
Guide

Order Number PB94-138948CDH, price: PC A13/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.; Naval
Facilities Engineering Service Center, Port Hueneme, CA;
Nov 93

The guide is a collection of (1) Engineering Bulletins pro-
duced by the EPA's Technical Support Branch in Cincinnati,
OH and (2) Remedial Action Tech Data Sheets produced by
the Naval Energy and Environmental Support Activity
(NEESA) in Port Hueneme, CA. These documents compre-
hensively summarize the latest Information obtainable on
many of the best available remedial technologies. The intent
is to convey information (based on previous applications) to
help remedial project managers, engineers in charge, on-
scene coordinators, Navy resident officers in charge of con-
struction, and contractors decide if a technology should be
used at a hazardous waste sit© and if so, what are the rele-
vant design, implementation, and cost considerations. Ad-
denda will be issued periodically to update the original bulle-
tins and tech data sheets, and other technologies may be
added.

Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Naval Facili-
ties Engineering Service Center, Port Hueneme, CA. 288p.

Subject index keywords; Hazardous materials, Remedial
action, Superfund.

1242 EPA SITE Demonstration of the Horsehead
Resource Development Company Flame Reactor
Technology

Order Number PB92-139401CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Versar, Inc., Springfield, VA,; PRC Environmental
Management, Inc., Houston, TX.* Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH, Risk Reduction Engineering Lab;

1992

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Superfund Inno-
vative Technology Evaluation (SITE) program selected the
Horsehead Resource Development Company, Inc. (HRD)
Flame Reactor technology for evaluation by demonstration
which took place in March 1991. A series of test runs was
conducted at the HRD facility in Monaca, Pennsylvania,
using 72 tons of secondary lead smelter slag (SLSS) from a
Superfund site in Atlanta, Georgia. The SLSS contained zinc,
iron, cadmium, and many other metals and inorganic com-
pounds. The HRD Flame Reactor technology is a patented
high-temperature thermal process designed to safely treat
wastes containing metals. During processing, the waste is in-
troduced to the hottest portion of the HRD Flame Reactor,
where it is subjected to greater than 2000 C reducing gas.
The waste material reacts rapidly, producing a nonhazardous
vitrified effluent slag and gases, including steam and metal
vapors. The metal vapors react in the combustion chamber
to produce the metal-enriched oxides that are collected in a
baghouse. The SITE program evaluated the HRD Flame Re-
actor for its effectiveness in treating a Superfund site waste,
which Is hazardous (by Toxicity Characteristic) for cadmium
and lead, to form a recyclable metal oxide and a vitrified slag
that is nonleachable.

Specifications: Presented at HMCRI's Annual National
Conference and Exhibition (12th), Washington, DC., Decem-
ber 3-5, 1991, p675-678. Prepared in cooperation with PRC
Environmental Management, Inc., Houston, TX. Sponsored

by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab. 7p.

Subject index keywords: Thermal reactors, Thermal recov-
ery methods, Pollution control equipment, Slags, Waste treat-
ment, Performance evaluation, Superfund Innovative Tech-
nology Evaluation Program.

1243 EPA Site Demonstration of the Terra Vac In situ
Vacuum Extraction Process in Groveland,

Massachusetts. (Site Program Update: Part VII)

Order Number PB9M82097CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; c1989

The paper presents an EPA evaluation of the patented Terra
Vac, Inc.'s in situ vacuum extraction process that was field-
demonstrated on a trichloroethylene (TCE) contaminated soil
in Groveland, MA, under the EPA Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation (SITE) program. The Terra Vac proc-
ess employs vacuum for removal and venting of volatile or-
ganic compounds (VOCs), such as TCE, from the subsurface
soil without excavation. The demonstration site was a proper-
ty of an operating machine shop in Groveland, MA. The site
was contaminated with VOCs, mainly TCE, which had been
used as a degreasing solvent. The Terra Vac system was
designed, installed, and operated by Terra Vac, Inc. Evalua-
tion of the process was performed by EPA based on the re-
sults from an extensive sampling and analytical program and
on daily observation of the operations.

Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of the Air Pollution Control As-
sociation, v39 n8 p1054-1062 Aug 89. 10p.

Subject index keywords: Remedial action, Land pollution
control, Volatile organic compounds, Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation Program, Terra Vac System, Soil
vacuum extraction.

1244 Estimation of the Cost of Using Chemical Protective
Clothing

Order Number PB93-168805CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Little (Arthur D.), Inc., Cambridge, MA.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab; 1993

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, either directly or
through its Superfund contractors, is a major user of chemi-
cal protective clothing. The purpose of the study was to de-
velop estimates for the cost of using this clothing. These es-
timates can be used to guide purchase decisions and use
practices. For example, economic guidelines would assist in
decisions pertinent to single-use versus reusable clothing.
Eight cost elements were considered: (1) purchase cost, (2)
the number of times an item is used, (3) the number of items
used per day, (4) cost of decontamination, (5) cost of inspec-
tion, (6) cost of maintenance, (7) cost of storage, and (8)
cost of disposal. Estimates or assumed inputs for each of
these elements were developed based on labor costs, fixed
costs, and recurring costs. The cost elements were com-
bined into an economic (mathematical) model having the
single output of cost/use. By comparing cost/use for various
use scenarios, conclusions are readily reached as to the op-
timum economics for purchase, use, and reuse of the cloth-
ing. In general, clothing should be considered disposable if
its purchase cost is less than its average cost/use per use
for the anticipated number of times it will be reused.

235

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:

Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents

Specifications: Pub. in Proceedings of the Performance of
Protective Clothing, v4 p972 981. Sponsored by Environmen-
tal Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engi-
neering Lab. 11 p.

Subject index keywords; Cost estimates, Protective cloth-
ing, Chemical compounds, Economic analysis, Occupational
safety and health, Industrial safety.

1245 Evaluation of Cleanup Levels for Remedial Action at
CERCLA (Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act) Sites Based on a
Review of EPA (Environmental Protection Agency)
Records of Decision

Order Number DE89Q079Q0CDH, price: PC AQ4/MF A01
Oak Ridge National Lab., TN.; Department of Energy,
Washington, DC; Jan 89

The review revealed that the record of decision (ROD) is an
imperfect instrument for examining the issue of how clean is
clean. The expectation of finding cleanup goals in each ROD
was not fulfilled for at least four reasons. First, many sites
are cleaned up in discrete steps or operable units; hence, a
HOD may not cover the full remedy. Second, the technical
feasibility of cleaning up a site is often unknown. In such
cases, cleanup levels are defined after implementation of the
remedy and not before. Third, the EPA often designs flexibil-
ity into the remedy selection process. In such cases, the
ROD does not make a decision on waste treatment technol-
ogy and, hence, the cleanup goal. Finally, some RODs are
simply deficient, lacking clarity, pertinent text, or substantive
information. This review makes it clear that most Superfund
cleanup goals fall short of returning sites to a pristine condi-
tion. However, the EPA has been consistent in its remedy
selection. Details may vary, but the gross features of reme-
dies are largely consistent and predictable. Uniform stand-
ards are not achieved in each cleanup because most sites
present complex and often unique cleanup problems. Reme-
dies to reduce the toxicity, volume, or mobility of hazardous
wastes without land disposal are expensive, technically diffi-
cult, and sometimes unavailable. As a result, the EPA opts
for practical solutions and defends its actions with carefully
crafted narratives intended to minimize regulatory, legal, and
bureaucratic entanglements. Hence, "clean" becomes what-
ever can be done at a reasonable cost with the technology
available and that will be accepted by the public. 18 refs., 2
figs., 20 tabs. (ERA citation 14:017155)

Specifications: Portions of this document are illegible in
microfiche products. 51 p.

Subject index keywords: Abandoned Sites, Hazardous Ma-
terials, Pollution Laws, Superfund, Remedial Action.

1246 Evaluation of Exposure Markers

Order Number PB91-144675CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Integrated Lab. Systems, Research Triangle Park, NC.;
Environmental Monitoring Systems Lab., Las Vegas,
NV.*Army Biomedical Research and Development Lab., Fort
Detrick. MD; Dec 90

The primary purpose of the research has been to determine
the suitability of the single cell gel (SCG) assay technique for
detecting DNA damage induced by genotoxic pollutants in
cells sampled from various organs of rodents and in cells
sampled from humans. The major chemicals evaluated in-
clude acrylamide, trichloroethylene, and dimethylbenzanthra-
cene. The focus of the research has been on: (1) evaluating
the specificity and sensitivity of the technique by determining

the magnitude and kinetics of DNA damage induced in cul-
tured mammalian cells by a variety of genotoxic chemicals;
(2) developing appropriate methods for isolating individual
cells from organs of rodents; (3) evaluating the kinetics of
DNA damage induced in various organs of male mice; (4) ex-
amining the applicability of the assay to peripheral blood leu-
kocytes obtained from humans exposed to genotoxic agents;
and (5) comparing the levels of DNA damage in the organs
of mice collected at an EPA Superfund site. Based on the
results obtained, the technique will provide, with greater sen-
sitivity than any other method currently available, data on the
induction and persistence of organ-specific levels of DNA
damage resulting from environmental exposure to genotoxic
pollutants.

Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Monitoring
Systems Lab., Las Vegas, NV., and Army Biomedical Re-
search and Development Lab., Fort Detrick, MD. 1Q9p.
Subject index keywords: Toxicity, Mutagenicity tests, DNA
damage, Biological markers, Environmental pollutants, Single
gel electrophoresis.

1247 Evaluation of Modifications to Extraction
Procedures Used in Analysis of Environmental Samples
from Superfund Sites

Order Number PB90-103516CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Lockheed Engineering and Sciences Co., Inc., Las Vegas,
NV.; Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV;

C1989

Recoveries from an aqueous sample of the semi-volatile an-
alytes listed on the EPA Target Compound List are com-
pared using 6 different methylene chloride extraction proce-
dures. Four experimental designs incorporating a continuous
extraction apparatus are evaluated, and 2 experimental de-
signs using separatory funnel methods are tested. In addi-
tion, 2 concentration procedures are compared, and the loss
of analytes associated with both extraction and concentra-
tion procedures are determined. These studies indicate that
the most efficient and economical technique for the extrac-
tion of these compounds from an aqueous matrix is a single
continuous extraction procedure performed at 2 pH,
Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of the Association of Official An-
alytical Chemists, v72 n4 p602-608 1989. Sponsored by En-
vironmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV. 9p.

Subject Index keywords: Chemical analysis, Waste dispos-
al, Site surveys, Solvent extraction, Superfund program.

1248 Evaluation of Personal Cooling Devices for Dioxln
Clean-Up Operation

Order Number PB92-206895CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Little (Arthur D.), Inc., Cambridge, MA.; Multi-Tech, Inc.,
Natick, MA."Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; 7 Sep 88
The study investigated the use of personal coolers to in-
crease worker productivity and safety while working at ele-
vated, ambient temperatures cleaning up dioxin contaminat-
ed soil. The study included laboratory tests to measure the
thermal characteristics of the chemical protective clothing
worn and the performance of ice vest and vortex personal
coolers. In addition, field tests were conducted at a dioxln
clean-up site to evaluate the performance of these two types
of personal coolers. The use of personal coolers was found
to be an effective method of reducing the risk of heat stress.
In addition, workers were able to work continuously in hot

236

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents

weather without following the procedure normally used to de-
crease heat stress, i.e., working one hour followed by one
hour of resting. Both types of personal coolers were accepta-
ble for the task being performed.

Specifications; See also PB86-236122 and PB86-176344.
Prepared in cooperation with Multi-Tech, Inc., Natick, MA.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 84p.

Subject index keywords: Dioxin, Protective equipment, Per-
sonal cooling devices, Superfund sites.

1249 Evaluation of Terrestrial Indicators for Use in
Ecological Assessments at Hazardous Waste Sites

Order Number PB93-100865CDH, price: PC A12/MF A03
ManTech Environmental Technology, Inc., Corvailis. OR.;
Missouri Univ,-Coiumbia.**Battelle Pacific Northwest Labs,,
Richland, WA. "Corvailis Environmental Research Lab., OR;
24 Sep 92

The target audience for the compendium includes regional
project managers and biological technical assistance groups.
The methods summarized are grouped according to their po-
tential target or receptor classification; animal, plant, or mi-
crobial. Methods which assess soils directly are emphasized
here but additional methods applicable to wetlands soils or
sediments have also been included to complement those
methods readily available for aquatic and sediment toxicity
assessment. Some of the methods summarized represent
consensus standards that have previously been identified as
methods applicable to soil testing, while others are less well
characterized but remain potential candidate methods for bi-
ological evaluation of soil contamination. Tabular guides to
the selection of tests methods applicable to various habitats
and toxicity endpoints are summarized to help potential users
select the most appropriate biological assessment tool for
the site under consideration.

Specifications: See also PB89-205967. Prepared in coop-
eration with Missouri Univ.-Columbia, and Battelle Pacific
Northwest Labs., Richland, WA. Sponsored by Corvailis Envi-
ronmental Research Lab., OR. 255p.

Subject index keywords: Terrestrial ecosystems, Hazard-
ous materials, Waste disposal, Superfund, Biological effects.

1250 Factors Affecting the Applicability of Plasma
Systems to the Cleanup of Superfund Sites

Order Number PB91-162784CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; 1991

For the past ten years, the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) has been evaluating plasma-based thermal
treatment systems for hazardous waste. Although many at-
tempts have been made to evaluate these devices, very little
performance data have been gathered. EPA is still interested
in evaluating the usefulness of plasma based hazardous
waste treatment and routinely receives proposals for testing
new and different plasma systems. Unfortunately, however,
elements of many of these proposals suggest that these
studies would be a little more successful than previous ones.
Part of the reason for this may be that the developers of
plasma systems do not clearly understand what Is required
of a hazardous waste treatment system, especially one
which will be used to treat hazardous wastes onsite. The
paper discusses factors that, based on EPA's experience,
are key to the successful implementation of a plasma-based
waste treatment process.

Specifications: Presented at Annual Conference on Plasma
Applications, (1st) Idaho Falls, ID., January 15-17, 1991.11 p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action, Haz-
ardous materials, Waste treatment, Plasma heating, Cleanup.

1251 Field Applications of Robotic Systems In Hazardous
Environments, p1-29 1993. See also PB86-176344 and
PB92-166743

Order Number PB93-229755CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; c1993

The chapter addresses field applications of robotic systems
at hazardous waste sites and in handling hazardous materi-
als. Included are an overview of EPA's current programs, as
they relate to robotic technology at hazardous waste sites;
potential application of robotics at those waste sites; exam-
ples of EPA's robotics projects; and the benefits of robotics
to EPA.

Specifications: 34p.

Subject index keywords: Robots, Hazardous materials, Oc-
cupational safety and health.

1252 Forum on Innovative Hazardous Waste Treatment
Technologies: Domestic and International. Held in
Atlanta, Georgia on June 19-21,1989. Abstract
Proceedings

Order Number PB90-268509CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
JACA Corp., Fort Washington, PA.; Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response; Sep 89

On June 19-21, 1989, the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency's Office of Program Management and Technology
hosted an international conference in Atlanta, GA, to ex-
change solutions to hazardous waste treatment problems.
During the conference, scientists and engineers representing
government agencies, industry, and academia attended 30
presentations describing successful case studies of physical/
chemical, biological, thermal, and stabilization treatment
methods. In addition, domestic and international scientists
and vendors presented over 40 posters explaining their treat-
ment methods and results.

Specifications; See also PB90-183799. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response. 56p.

Subject index keywords: Ground water, Hazardous wastes,
Waste treatment, Meetings, Superfund.

1253 Forum on Innovative Hazardous Waste Treatment
Technologies: Domestic and International, Held In
Atlanta, Georgia on June 19-21, 1989. Technical Papers

Order Number PB90-183799CDH, price: PC A15/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 89
As a result of the high level of interest in innovative hazard-
ous waste control technologies, U.S. EPA's Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response and Risk Reduction Engi-
neering Laboratory jointly conducted this conference. The
conference consisted of presentations of technical papers
and posters by international and domestic vendors of tech-
nologies for the treatment of waste, sludge, and contaminat-
ed soils at uncontrolled hazardous waste disposal sites. The
purpose of the 2 1/2 day conference was two-fold: to help
introduce promising international technologies through teeh-

237

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents

nical paper and poster displays; and to showcase results of
the U.S. EPA Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
program technologies in addition to other domestic innova-
tive technologies. Both were aimed at increasing awareness
of the user community in technologies ready for application.
The compendium does not include all papers that were pre-
sented; only those that were made available by authors and
their institutions are included.

Specifications: 328p.

Subject index keywords: Meetings, Hazardous materials,
Waste treatment, Pollution control, Technology utilization,
Land pollution.

1254 Forum on Innovative Hazardous Waste Treatment
Technologies (3rd): Domestic and international. Held in
Dallas, Texas on June 11-13,1991. Technical Papers

Order Number PB92-219732CDH, price: PC A22/MF A04
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 91

On June 11-13, 1991, the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency's Technology Innovation Office and Risk Reduction
Engineering Laboratory hosted an international conference in
Dallas, TX, to exchange solutions to hazardous waste treat-
ment problems. This conference, the Third Forum on Innova-
tive Hazardous Waste Treatment Technologies; Domestic
and International, was attended by approximately 750 repre-
sentatives from the U.S. and several foreign countries.
During the conference, scientists and engineers representing
government agencies, industry, and academia attended 37
presentations describing domestic and international technol-
ogies for the treatment of waste, sludges, and contaminated
soils at uncontrolled hazardous waste disposal sites. Tech-
nologies included physical/chemical, biological, thermal, and
stabilization techniques presented by EPA and other federal
government agency contractors. Domestic and international
scientists and vendors presented over 50 posters explaining
their treatment methods and results.

Specifications: See also PB91-145649. 514p.

Subject index keywords: Meetings, Hazardous materials,
Waste treatment, Technology innovation.

1255 Furthering the Use of Innovative Treatment
Technologies In OSWER Programs

Order Number PB91-921336CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 10 dun 91

The Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
(OSWER), in this directive, is seeking to further the use of
innovative treatment technologies in order to (1) better
pursue its statutory and regulatory mandates to promote
treatment to the maximum extent practicable; (2) speed the
availability of performance data regarding newly developed
treatment technologies to many constituencies facing man-
dates to clean contaminated sites; (3) broaden the inventory
of accepted treatment-based solutions; and (4) increase the
likelihood the remediation costs can be lowered in the near
term through the demonstration of a larger number of engi-
neering options to solve site remediation problems.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Waste treatment, Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response.

1256 Furthering the Use of Innovative Treatment
Technologies in OSWER Programs

Order Number PB91-921366CDH, price; PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 91
The fact sheet provides an overview of directive 9380.0-17,
Furthering the Use of innovative Treatment Technologies in
OSWER Programs. The Office of Solid Waste and Emergen-
cy Response (OSWER) is seeking to further the use of inno-
vative treatment technologies in order to (1) better pursue its
statutory and regulatory mandates to promote treatment to
the maximum extent practicable, (2) speed the availability of
performance data regarding newly developed treatment tech-
nologies to many constituencies facing mandates to clean
contaminated sites, (3) broaden the inventory of accepted
treatment-based solutions and (4) increase the likelihood the
remediation costs can be lowered.

Subject Index keywords; Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment, Superfund, Clean up.

1257 Future of Expert Systems in the Environmental
Protection Agency

Order Number PB91-162727CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab.; Computer Sciences Corp.,
Cincinnati, OH; C1989

As in other organizations, the history of expert systems in the
Environmental Protection Agency is very short. Approximate-
ly five years ago, the focus of the expert systems activities
was to assess the feasibility and utility as environmental de-
cision aids. Last year the Agency approved a five year fund-
ing initiative to support development of a number of systems
to assist in management and implementation of Superfund
activities. Whereas initial systems were limited to a few engi-
neering and technical issues, the scope of todays systems
includes legal, regulatory and administrative issues. Notwith-
standing this rapid evolution in scope and funding, expert
systems are not currently mainstream decision making tools
in the Environmental Protection Agency, Many decision
makers are either not familiar with expert systems or are
skeptical that they can provide meaningful and reliable
advice. Since expert systems are so new and have not yet
been proved for wide spread application in regulatory envi-
ronment, their future is uncertain. With this background, the
paper will propose one or more scenarios for the future of
expert systems in the Environmental Protection Agency,
(Copyright (c) 1990 American Chemical Society.)
Specifications: Presented at the American Chemical Socie-
ty Conference, Miami, FL., September 10-15, 1989. Prepared
in cooperation with Computer Sciences Corp., Cincinnati,
OH. 10p.

Subject Index keywords: Environmental tests, US EPA, En-
vironmental management, Expert systems.

238

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents

1258 Granular Activated Carbon Treatment. Engineering
Bulletin

Order Number PB92-180058CDH, price: PC AQ2/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 91
Granular activated carbon (GAC) treatment is a physico-
chemical process that removes a wide variety of contami-
nants by adsorbing them from liquid and gas streams. The
treatment is most commonly used to separate organic con-
taminants from water or air; however, it can be used to
remove a limited number of inorganic contaminants. In most
cases, the contaminants are collected in concentrated form
on the GAC, and further treatment is required. Site-specific
treatability studies are generally necessary to document the
applicability and potential performance of a GAC system.
The bulletin provides information on the technology applica-
bility, technology limitations, a technology description, the
types of residuals produced, site requirements, latest per-
formance data, status of the technology, and sources for fur-
ther information.

Specifications; See also PB87-110656 and PB89-132674.
9p.

Subject index keywords: Waste treatment, Granular activat-
ed carbon treatment, Hazardous materials, Water pollution
control, Remedial action.

1259 Guidance Documents Relating to Landfills and
Contaminants

Order Number PB90-261835CDH, price: PC AQ3/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; 1990

The Environmental Protection Agency is developing and up-
dating a series of Technical Guidance Documents to provide
best engineering control technology to meet the needs of the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and the
Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and
Liability Act (CERCLA), respectively. These documents are
the compilation of the research efforts to date relating to
containment of pollutants from waste disposal to the land as
relates to residuals management. The specific areas of re-
search being conducted under the RCRA land disposal pro-
gram relates to laboratory, pilot and field validation studies in
cover systems, waste leaching and solidification, liner sys-
tems and disposal facility evaluation. The specific areas of
research being conducted under the CERCLA uncontrolled
waste sites (Superfund) program relate to in situ treatment,
solidification/stabilization for treating hazardous waste, com-
bustion technologies, best demonstrated available technolo-
gy (BDAT), on-site treatment technologies, emerging biosys-
tems, expert systems, personnel health protection equip-
ment, and site and situation assessment. The Guidance Doc-
uments are intended to assist both the regulated community
and the permitting authorities, as well as the Program Of-
fices, and Regions, as well as the states and other interested
parties, with the latest information relevant to waste manage-
ment.

Specifications: Presented at the Annual Recycling Con-
gress (6th), Berlin, Germany, November 28-30, 1989. 14p.
Subject index keywords: Guidelines, Earth fills, Hazardous
materials, Best technology, Land disposal.

1260 Guidance on Remedial Actions for Superfund Sites
with PCB Contamination

Order Number PB91-145466CDH, price: PC A08/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 90
The document describes the recommended approach for
evaluating and remediating Superfund sites with PCB con-
tamination. It provides starting point cleanup levels for vari-
ous media that may become contaminated and identifies
other considerations important to ensuring protection of
human health and the environment that these cleanup levels
may not address. The guidance also describes how to devel-
op remedial alternatives for PCB contaminated materials that
are consistent with Superfund program expectations and re-
quirements. The guidance concludes with a discussion of
considerations unique to PCBs that should be considered in
the nine criteria evaluation and likely tradeoffs between op-
tions that are likely to occur.

Specifications: Also available from Supt. of Docs. 151 p.
Subject index keywords: Chlorine organic compounds,
Hazardous materials, Pollution control, Superfund.

1261 Guidance on Remedial Actions for Superfund Sites
with PCB Contamination

Order Number PB91-921206CDH, price; PC A07/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 90
The document describes the recommend approach for evalu-
ating and remediating Superfund sites with PCB contamina-
tion. It should be used as aguide in the investigation and
remedy selection process for PCB-contaminated Superfund
sites. The guidance provides preliminary remediation goals
for various media that may be contaminated and identifies
other considerations important to ensuring protection of
human health and the environment. In addition, potential ap-
plicable or relevant and appropriate requirements (ARARs)
and 'to-be-considered' criteria pertinent to Superfund sites
with PCB contamination and their integration into the RI/FS
and remedy selection process are summarized. The guid-
ance also describes how to develop remedial alternatives for
PCB contaminated materials that are consistent with Super-
fund program expectations and ARARs. To identify the areas
for which a response action should be considered, starting
point concentrations (preliminary cleanup goals) for each
media are identified.

Subject index keywords: Public health, Hazardous materi-
als, Pollution control, Superfund, Polychlorinated biphenyl.

1262 Guide on Remedial Actions at Superfund Sites with
PCB Contamination

Order Number PB90-274432CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 90
The fact sheet summarizes pertinent considerations in the
development, evaluation, and selection of remedial actions at
Superfund sites with PCB contamination. It provides a gener-
al framework for determining cleanup levels, identifying treat-
ment options, and assessing necessary management con-
trols for residuals.

239

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents

Specifications; 8p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Guidelines,
Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid Waste arid
Emergency Response, Remedial action, Polychlorinated bi-
phenyls.

1263 Horsehead Resource Development Company, Inc.
Flame Reactor Technology: Applications Analysis Report

Order Number PB92-213214CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Chicago, IL.;
Horsehead Resource Development Co., Inc., Monaca,
PA.*Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; May 92
A SITE demonstration of the Horsehead Resource Develop-
ment (HRD) Company, Inc. Flame Reactor Technology was
conducted in March 1991 at the HRD facility in Monaca,
Pennsylvania. For the demonstration, secondary lead smelter
soda slag was treated to produce a potentially recyclable
lead- and zinc-enriched oxide product and a nonhazardous
(based on the regulatory requirements of the Toxicity Char-
acteristic test) effluent slag. The lead and zinc in the oxide
product were concentrated about threefold from the feed
concentrations. The effluent slag was determined to be non-
hazardous based on extraction by the Toxicity Characteristic
Leaching Procedure. Potential wastes that might be treated
include industrial residues, Resource Conservation and Re-
covery Act wastes, Superfund wastes, and other wastes con-
taminated with metals and organic wastes.

Specifications: See also PB92-139401 and PB92-505822.
Prepared in cooperation with Horsehead Resource Develop-
ment Co., Inc., Monaca, PA. Sponsored by Environmental
Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineer-
ing Lab. 70p.

Subject Index keywords: Thermal reactors, Materials recov-
ery, Waste treatment, Superfund Innovative Technology Eval-
uation Program, Horsehead Resource Development Compa-
ny.

1284 Horsehead Resource Development Company, Inc.,
Flame Reactor Technology. Technology Demonstration
Summary

Order Number PB93-145639CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Oct 92

Under the Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
(SITE) program, the Horsehead Resource Development
Company, Inc., (HRD) Flame Reactor was evaluated during a
series of test runs. The tests were conducted at the HRD fa-
cility in Monaca, PA, using 72 tons of secondary lead smelter
soda slag {waste feed) from the National Smelting and Refin-
ing Company, Inc., site in Atlanta, GA. The waste feed con-
tained lead, zinc, iron, and many other metals and inorganic
compounds. This summary includes an overview of the dem-
onstration, a technology description, analytical results, and
conclusions.

Specifications: See also PB92-213214. 8p.

Subject index keywords: Waste treatment, Technology in-
novation, Slags, Hazardous materials, Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation Program, HRD flame reactor.

1265 Hydraulic Fracturing Technology: Technology
Evaluation Report and Application Analysis Report

Order Number PB94-100161CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Rolling Meadows, IL.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 93

Two pilot-scale demonstrations of the hydraulic fracturing
technology for enhancing the permeability of contaminated
silty clays have been evaluated under the Superfund Innova-
tive Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program. The hydraulic
fracturing technology was demonstrated in 1991 and 1992 at
a extraction site in Oak Brook, Illinois, and at a bioremedia-
tion site near Dayton, Ohio. The technology was jointly de-
veloped by the University of Cincinnati (UC) and the Risk Re-
duction Engineering Laboratory. Tests were also conducted
at UC Center Hill Solid and Hazardous Waste Research
(Center Hill) Facility by UC. These tests were conducted to
determine the factors affecting soil vapor flow through sand-
filled hydraulic fractures.

Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response. 150p.

Subject index keywords: Hydraulic fracturing, Superfund,
Remedial action.

1266 Implementation Plan for the Record of Decision for
Disposal of Hanford Defense High-Level, Transuranic,
and Tank Wastes

Order Number DE89010128CDH, price: PC AG3/MF A01
Department of Energy, Richland, WA. Richland Operations
Office.; Department of Energy, Washington, DC; Jun 88
The Record of Decision concludes one phase and initiates
another leading to the disposal of two thirds (by radioactivity)
of the defense waste at Hanford. It also commits to continu-
ing evaluations for most of the remaining one third before
final disposal or remediation decisions are made. The US
Department of Energy (DOE) has decided to implement the
preferred alternative. The preferred alternative recommends
disposal of double-shell tank waste, and encapsulated
cesium and strontium waste. Also to be disposed of is the
only solid waste site from before 1970 suspected of being
contaminated with transuranic elements and not on Han-
ford's central plateau. This site is near the commercial nucle-
ar power plant operated by the Washington Public Power
Supply System (WNP-2). Disposal costs stated in this plan,
including costs for construction of disposal facilities, are
taken from the HDW-EIS. Schedules for disposal activities
are from the Hanford Waste Management Plan (DOE/RL 87-
13). Schedules for development and evaluation activities are
from the Hanford Waste Management Technology Plan
(DOE/RL 87-14). Estimated costs and schedules are subject
to change as activities proceed, implementing requirements
of environmental regulations are further defined, more de-
tailed studies are performed, policy decisions are made af-
fecting work scope (e.g., the decision to place N Reactor in
cold standby), and funding levels are defined through the
Federal budgeting process. The Hanford Waste Management
Plan and the Hanford Waste Management Technology Plan
are revised annually to provide updated information on costs
and schedules for disposal and development activities.
These or their successors should be referred to for current
information on disposal plans, costs, and schedules. Dispos-
al operations will be conducted in compliance with all appli-

240

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents

cable environmental regulations, standards, and permit re-
quirements. (ERA citation 14:024166)

Specifications: Portions of this document are illegible in
microfiche products. 29p.

Subject index keywords: High-Level Radioactive Wastes,
Planning, Radioactive Waste Management.

1267 Incineration Data on Arsenic and Lead Emissions

Order Number PB92-179043CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Kennesaw State Coll., Marietta, GA.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab; 1992

Since 1988, nine test programs have been conducted at the
Environmental Protection Agency Incineration Research Fa-
cility aimed at evaluating the fate of trace metals in the rotary
kiln incineration of hazardous wastes and Superfund site ma-
terials. Results of six of those test programs have been re-
ported to date. Of these six, two were parametric test series
using a synthetic hazardous waste formulation and four were
incineration treatability test programs using contaminated Su-
perfund site materials. Results of these six text programs
show remarkably consistent arsenic and lead partitioning be-
havior among the incinerator system discharge streams.
Overall test programs lead exhibits relatively nonvolatile be-
havior over a Win temperature range from nominally 815 C
{1,500 F) to 980 C (1.800F) provided no chlorine is present
in the feed material. Arsenic also exhibits relatively nonvola-
tile behavior over the same temperature range regardless of
whether the feed contains chlorine at levels up to nominally
8 percent. Arsenic may be more volatile in the incineration of
environmental samples such as Superfund site wastes than it
is from a synthetic waste in which arsenic is introduced as
As203 in aqueous solution. However, even with environmen-
tal samples, behavior is relatively nonvolatile. Lead volatility
significantly increases at all kiln temperatures as feed chlo-
rine content increases from 0 to as high as 8 percent.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
14p.

Subject index keywords: Waste disposal, Incineration, Air
pollution control equipment, Arsenic, Lead(Metal),

1268 Incineration Treatment of Arsenic-Contaminated
Soil

Order Number PB91-183541CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Acurex Corp., Mountain View, CA.: Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab;
C1991

An incineration test program was conducted at the US Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency's Incineration Research Facility
to evaluate the potential of incineration as a treatment option
for contaminated soils at the Baird and McGuire Superfund
site in Holbrook, Massachusetts. The purpose of these tests
was to evaluate the incinerability of these soils in terms of
the fate of arsenic and lead and the destruction of organic
contaminants during the incineration process. The test pro-
gram consisted of a series of bench-scale experiments with
a muffle furnace and a series of incineration tests in a pilot-
scale rotary kiln incinerator system. The study reported in the
paper was funded by the Environmental Protection Agency
under Contract 68-C9-0038 to Acurex Corporation. It has
been subjected to the Agency's review and has been ap-
proved for publication. Mention of trade names or commer-

cial products does not constitute endorsement or recommen-
dation for use.

Specifications: Pub. in Remediation, p227-237 Spring 1991.

Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,

OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 13p.

Subject index keywords: Incineration, Remedial action, Soil

contamination, Waste management, Superfund, Air pollution

control.

1269 Innovative Operational Treatment Technologies for
Application to Superfund Site: Nine Case Studies

Order Number PB90-202656CDH, price; PC A07/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Apr 90
Nine case studies are presented in a report that was de-
signed to identify and obtain operational data from ongoing
and completed remediation efforts. The case studies are pre-
sented as appendices, and provide process descriptions,
performance, operational and cost data. The nine appendi-
ces present case studies on the following topics. Incineration
of Explosives and Contaminated soils. Groundwater Extrac-
tion with Air Stripping, Groundwater Biodegradation Treat-
ment System, Ground Extraction and Treatment, Groundwat-
er Extraction with Air Stripping and Soil Vacuum Extraction,
Groundwater Extraction with Physical Chemical and Biologi-
cal Treatment, and Chemical Treatment of Groundwater and
Soil Flushing.

Specifications: I47p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment.

1270 Innovative Technology: BEST Solvent Extraction
Process

Order Number PB90-274218CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 89
The fact sheet provides technology description, site charac-
teristics affecting treatment feasibility, technology consider-
ations, and technology status for the BEST solvent extraction
process. The sheet describes the BEST process as using
one or more secondary or tertiary amines to separate toxic
wastes and oils from sludges or soils.

Specifications: 5p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Solvent ex-
traction, Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, Best technology.

1271 Innovative Technology: Slurry-Phase
Biodegradation

Order Number PB90-274200CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 89
The fact sheet provides technology description, site charac-
teristics affecting treatment feasibility, technology consider-
ations, and technology status for Slurry Phase Biodegrada-
tion (SPB). The sheet describes how SPB is potentially effec-
tive in treating various organic contaminants.

Specifications: 5p.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Biodeterior-
ation, Slurries, Waste treatment, Superfund, Waste manage-
ment, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Re-
medial action.

241

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents

1272 innovative Treatment Technologies: Overview and
Guide to Information Sources

Order Number PB92-179001CDH, price: PC A20/MF A04
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Oct 91
Content: The document is a compilation of information on in-
novative treatment technologies being used in the Superfund
program and is intended to assist site project managers, con-
sultants, responsible parties, and owner/operators in their ef-
forts to identify current literature on innovative treatment
technologies for hazardous waste remediation on corrective
action. The technologies addressed in the guide include the
following: Incineration, Thermal Desorption, Soil Washing,
Solvent Extraction, Dechlorination, Bioremediation, Vacuum
Extraction, Vitrification, and Ground Water Treatment. Also
included in the guide for the user's reference are summary
statistics of EPA's selection and application of innovative
treatment technologies between 1982 and 1990. In addition
the guide provides for each technology a detailed descrip-
tion, status of development and application, strengths, weak-
nesses and materials handling considerations. A comprehen-
sive bibliography for each technology can be found within
each chapter.

Specifications; 460p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste treatment, Remedial action, Waste disposal.

1273 Innovative Treatment Technologies: Semi-Annual
Status Report (Fourth Edition)

Order Number PB93-133387CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Technology Innovation Office; Oct 92
The twice yearly report contains site-specific information on
Superfund sites (both remedial and emergency response ac-
tions) and non-Superfund sites (within the Departments of
Defense and Energy) where innovative treatment technol-
ogies have been or are being used. Innovative treatment
technologies are treatment technologies for which a lack of
data on cost and performance makes their selection and use
at Superfund sites more difficult. The report documents the
use of the following innovative treatment technologies to
treat ground water in situ, soils, sediments, sludge, and solid-
matrix wastes; bioremediation (ex situ), bioremediation (in
situ), chemical treatment, dechlorination, in situ flushing, in
situ vitrification, soil vapor extraction, soil washing, solvent
extraction, thermal desorption, and other technologies.
Specifications: See also PB92-173210. 87p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment, Ground water, Soils, Superfund, Remedial action.

1274 Innovative Treatment Technologies: Seml-Annua!
Status Report, January 1991. First Issue

Order Number PB91-921290CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 91
The document was developed to provide information on spe-
cific sites that have selected or used innovative treatment
technologies. The information serves several purposes: (1) to
track the progress of innovative technology use; (2) to pro-
vide market information to technology vendors; and (3) to fa-
cilitate communication among innovative technology users.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,

and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 30p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment, Superfund.

1275 Innovative Treatment Technologies: Semi-Annual
Status Report, (Third Edition)

Order Number PB92-173210CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Apr 92
The twice-yearly report contains site-specific information on
Superfund sites (both remedial and emergency response ac-
tions) where innovative treatment technologies have been or
are being used. Innovative treatment technologies are treat-
ment technologies for which a lack of data on cost and per-
formance makes their selection and use at Superfund sites
more difficult. The report documents the use of the following
innovative treatment technologies to treat ground water in
situ, soils, sediments, sludge, and solid-matrix wastes; biore-
mediation (ex situ), bioremediation (in situ), chemical treat-
ment, dechlorination, in situ flushing, in situ vitrification, soil
vapor extraction, soil washing, solvent extraction, thermal de-
sorption, and other technologies. The report includes infor-
mation on 210 applications of Innovative treatment technol-
ogies for Superfund remedial actions and 18 applications for
emergency response actions. The April 1992 issue updates
the status of each project listed in the September 1991
report. Additions to the report include 70 innovative treat-
ment technologies selected for remedial actions in Fiscal
Year 1991 Superfund Records of Decision (RODs) and more
detailed information on completed projects.

Specifications: Supersedes PB91-921290. 91p.

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Waste treatment. Water pollution control, Innovative treat-
ment technologies.

1276 Installation Restoration Program. Technical Support
Document for Record of Decision, Cape Newenham, AFS

Order Number AD-A193 502/2CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Woodward-Clyde Consultants, Anchorage, AK; 18 Jan 88
This record of decision and supplemental support document
applies to six potential hazardous waste sites identified at
Cape Newenham AFS. The recommendations for all six sites
are the same; therefore, a single document for the entire in-
stallation is warranted. Information presented in this docu-
ment supports a finding that there is no significant impact on
human health or the environment from suspected or con-
firmed past contamination at the Cape Newenham AFS. The
recommended remedy is no further action with regard to in-
vestigation or clean-up of six (6) sites identified as possible
areas of contamination at the Air Force station.
Specifications: 76p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal.

1277 Installation Restoration Program Technical Support
Document for Record of Decision, Tatalina Air Force
Station LRRS Site

Order Number AD-A202 315/8CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Woodward-Clyde Consultants, Anchorage, AK; 29 Feb 88
The Tatalina Air Force Station (AFS), located in the south-
central interior of Alaska, was investigated under Phase I of
the Installation Restoration Program (IRP). The findings of

242

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents

that study indicated eleven potentially contaminated hazard-
ous waste areas at the installation. The report recommended
follow-up action for all sites. A 1987 field visit verified that
clean up has occurred at several sites. No evidence of signif-
icant contamination was observed at the sites where cleanup
activities had not occurred. The following document presents
the information collected in support of no further action at
Tatalina AFS. Keywords: Solid waste disposal, Risk screen-
ing. (KR)

Specifications: 79p.

Subject index keywords: Air Force facilities, Waste dispos-
al, Inspection.

1278 International Conference on New Frontiers for
Hazardous Waste Management (Third) Proceedings. Held
in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania on September 10-13,1989

Order Number PB90-127200CDH, price: Call for price
PEI Associates, Inc., Cincinnati, OH.; IT Corp., Knoxville,
TN.*Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab.*United Nations Environment
Programme, Paris (France).*World Federation of Engineering
Organizations, Pasadena, CA; c1989
The Third International Conference on New Frontiers for
Hazardous Waste Management was held at Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania, September 10-13, 1989. The purpose of the
conference was to examine the state of technology for the
disposal of hazardous waste. Emphasis was placed on the
presentation of papers that summarized important new tech-
nological developments and concepts with broad internation-
al application. Sessions were held in the areas of: (1) Ther-
mal Treatment, (2) Physical/Chemical Treatment, (3) Biologi-
cal Treatment, (4) Land Disposal, (5) Solidification/Stabiliza-
tion, (6) Waste Minimization, and (7) Waste Management.
Specifications: Also available from Supt. of Docs. Prepared
in cooperation with IT Corp., Knoxville, TN. Sponsored by
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Re-
duction Engineering Lab., United Nations Environment Pro-
gramme, Paris (France), and World Federation of Engineer-
ing Organizations, Pasadena, CA. 612p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution,
Meetings.

1279 international Symposium on Field Screening
Methods for Hazardous Wastes and Toxic Chemicals
(2nd), Proceedings. Held in Las Vegas, Nevada on
February 12-14, 1991

Order Number PB92-125764CDH, price: PCS98.00
Department of Energy, Washington, DC.; Environmental
Monitoring Systems Lab., Las Vegas, NV.*Army Toxic and
Hazardous Materials Agency, Aberdeen Proving Ground,
MD.'Department of the Air Force, Washington, DC.*Florida
State Univ., Tallahassee; Dec 91

The document presents the technical papers that were pre-
sented at the Second International Symposium on Field
Screening Methods for Hazardous Wastes and Toxic Chemi-
cals. Sixty platform presentations were made and included in
one of ten sessions: chemical sensors; ion mobility spec-
trometry; robotics; QA and study design; air pathway monitor-
ing at Superfund sites; field mobile GC/MS techniques; port-
able gas chromatography; field screening methods for worker
safety; x-ray fluorescence; and, Fourier transform infrared
spectrometry and other spectroscopy methods. In addition,
sixty poster presentations were made and each presenter
submitted a four-page extended abstract for inclusion in the

proceedings. The poster presentations covered the same
topics as those mentioned above and other topics such as
immunoassay techniques, sample preparation techniques,
and case studies of technology application.

Specifications: See also PB90-132572 and P389-134159.
Sponsored by Environmental Monitoring Systems Lab., Las
Vegas, NV., Army Toxic and Hazardous Materials Agency,
Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD„ Department of the Air Force,
Washington, DC., and Florida State Univ., Tallahassee. B50p.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous wastes, Meetings,
Waste management, Site characterization, Chemical analysis,
Environmental monitoring.

1280 Issues Paper on Radiation Site Cleanup Regulations

Order Number PB94-112349CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC- Office of
Air and Radiation; Sep 93

EPA prepared the document to present issues, approaches,
and preliminary analyses related to its development of radi-
ation site cleanup regulations. It focuses exclusively on
issues and approaches related to developing cleanup regula-
tions; it does not address issues specific to waste manage-
ment regulations, which will be addressed in a separate doc-
ument. The first three chapters discuss Significant Issues,
Regulatory Approaches, and Summary and Next Steps. Ap-
pendix A presents background information on radioactive
waste and provides additional details of EPA coordination of
its rulemaking effort. Appendix B discusses statutory authori-
ties upon which EPA may base its cleanup regulations. Ap-
pendix C is a copy of the EPA/NRC MOU. Appendix D dis-
cusses the issues raised in NRC's Enhanced Participatory
Rulemaking on Radiological Criteria for Decommissioning, in
which EPA participated. Appendix E is a list of acronyms,
and Appendix F is a glossary of terms used throughout the
document.

Specifications: 67p.

Subject index keywords: Radioactive wastes, Risk assess-
ment, Superfund,

1281 Literature Survey of Innovative Technologies for
Hazardous Waste Site Remediation, 1987-1991

Order Number PB93-105617CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Jul 92
EPA's Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response is
seeking to further the use of innovative hazardous waste
treatment technologies in its programs. In order to achieve
more permanent remedies, the Agency is encouraging the
use of new or innovative technologies that are capable of
treating contaminated soils/sludges and ground water more
effectively, less expensively, and in a manner more accepta-
ble to the public than existing conventional methods. The
bibliography is intended to increase the efficiency of the
technology evaluation process. The document is not meant
to be comprehensive in scope nor is it meant to convey an
endorsement of the citations. It is meant to provide a survey
of publications which could be useful when innovative tech-
nologies are investigated. As a research aid, the bibliography
can help provide insights into current developments and pro-
vide references which may serve as a basis for further inves-
tigations.

Specifications: Also available from Supt. of Docs. 50p.

243

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Remedial
action, Waste treatment, Soil treatment, Bibliographies, Inno-
vative treatment technologies,

1282 Metals Testing Report; Metal Content of
Environmental Samples from Region 4

Order Number PB90-187105CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Corvallis Environmental Research Lab., OR.; NSI Technology
Services Corp., Corvallis, OR; Dec 89
The report summarizes the procedures used to analyze se-
lected aquatic and emergent plant, aquatic insect, and fish
samples for specific metals; and presents the results of the
analyses along with some interpretation. Samples were re-
ceived from Region 4, Environmental Services Division,
Athens, Georgia, under an agreement in which the ERL-C
Site Assessment Team would determine the metal content of
the samples, lead being the primary metal of interest, and
forward the results to Region 4 to aid in the site assess-
ments. Samples were collected from two Superfund sites in
the southeast United States, the Kassouf-Kimerling site in
Tampa, FL, and the Schuylkill site in Plant City, FL. Both
were 'battery cracking' sites. The samples were acid digest-
ed to reduce them to inorganic constituents which were then
analyzed with ICP-AES (inductively-coupled plasma-atomic
emission spectroscopy). Metals assessed included calcium,
magnesium, sodium, potassium, phosphorous, zinc, alumi-
num, iron, manganese, copper, chromium, nickel, arsenic,
lead, boron, cobalt, and molybdenum.

Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with NSI Technolo-
gy Services Corp., Corvallis, OR. 16p.

Subject Index keywords: Water pollution, Water chemistry,
Metals, Ions, Quantitative analysis.

1283 OSWER Source Book: Training and Technology
Transfer Resources

Order Number PB92-102169CDH, price: PC A13/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; May 91
The OSWER Source Book consolidates information on the
numerous training and other technology transfer resources
sponsored by EPA's Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response (OSWER) and others. The OSWER Source Book
provides descriptions of training courses, videos and publica-
tions of interest to Federal and State personnel working in
solid and hazardous waste management. The OSWER
Source Book should be especially useful to Federal person-
nel working in programs under authorities of the RCRA,
CERCLA, SARA, or other similar Federal environmental man-
agement and restoration programs.

Specifications: 297p.

Subject index keywords: Technology transfer, Hazardous
materials, Waste management, Superfund, Training, Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

1284 OSWER Source Book. Volume 1. Training and
Technology Transfer Resources, 1992-1993

Order Number PB93-14398QCDH, price: PC A10/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 92
Volumes I and II of The OSWER Source Book provide infor-
mation on the many training courses, publications, video-
tapes, and information systems and software available to
support EPA staff, State and local agencies, and others in-
volved in managing the Nation's hazardous and solid waste

programs. The Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Re-
sponse's (OSWER) Technology Innovation Office (TIO) has
compiled listings of the most significant training and technol-
ogy transfer resources available to assist individuals with the
responsibility for accomplishing OSWER's mission. Volume I
of The Source Book contains listings of OSWER and other
office training courses, publications, videotapes, information
systems and software, and support programs devoted to
hazardous and solid waste issues.

Specifications: See also Volume 2, PB93-144129 and
PB92-102169. 206p.

Subject Index keywords: Technology transfer, Hazardous
materials, Waste management, Superfund, Training, Bibliog-
raphies, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

1285 OSWER Source Book. Volume 2. Training and
Technology Transfer Resources, 1992-1993

Order Number PB93-144129CDH, price: PC A11/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 92
Volumes 1 and II of The OSWER Source Book provide infor-
mation on the many training courses, publications, video-
tapes, and information systems and software available to
support EPA staff, State and local agencies, and others in-
volved in managing the Nation's hazardous and solid waste
programs. The Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Re-
sponse's (OSWER) Technology Innovation Office (TIO) has
compiled listings of the most significant training and technol-
ogy transfer resources available to assist individuals with the
responsibility for accomplishing OSWER's mission. Volume II
contains frequently requested OSW publications, including
those that address municipal solid waste and recycling. This
second volume of The Source Book is new for this edition,
and provides much additional information compared to the
earlier version.

Specifications: See also Volume 1, PB93-143980. 236p.
Subject index keywords: Technology transfer, Hazardous
materials, Waste management, Superfund, Training, Bibliog-
raphies, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

1286 Personnel Protection through Reconnaissance
Robotics at Superfund Remedial Sites

Order Number PB92-166743CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; c1992

Investigation, mitigation, and clean-up of hazardous materials
at Superfund sites normally require on-site workers to per-
form hazardous and sometimes potentially dangerous func-
tions. Such functions include site surveys and the reconnais-
sance for airborne and buried toxic environmental contami-
nants. Workers conducting on-site air monitoring risk derma!,
ocular and inhalation exposure to hazardous chemicals, while
those performing excavations also risk in addition the poten-
tial exposure to fire, explosion, and other physical injury.
EPA's current efforts to protect its workers and mitigate
these risks include the use of robotic devices. Using robots
offers the ultimate in personnel protection by removing the
worker from the site of potential exposure. The paper de-
scribes the demonstration of a commercially-available robotic
platform modified and equipped for air monitoring and the
ongoing research for the development of a ground penetrat-
ing radar (GPR) system to detect buried chemical waste
drums. These robotic devices can be ultimately routinely de-

244

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents

ployed In the field for the purpose of conducting inherently
safe reconnaissance activities during Superfund/SARA reme-
dial operations.

Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of Air and Waste Management
Association, v42 n3 p341-345 Mar 92. See also PB90-
134164. 6p.

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Robotics, Occupation-
al safety and health, Air pollution monitoring, Hazardous ma-
terials.

1287 Physical/Chemical Treatment of Hazardous Waste
Sites: Speaker Slide Copies and Supporting Information

Order Number PB91-145433CDH, price: PC A11/MF A02
PEER Consultants, Inc., Dayton, OH,; Environmental
Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Center for Environmental
Research Information; Apr 90

Contents: Process-Based Treatment Decision Making; Treat-
ability Studies and Data Quality Objectives; Material Handling
including Debris Separation and Decontamination; Separa-
tion of Inorganic Contaminants from Soils and Sludges; Sep-
aration and Treatment of Inorganics in Aqueous Matrices;
Separation of Organic Contaminants from Soils and Sludges;
Separation and Treatment of Organics in Liquids; Collection
and Treatment of Gases; Databases Supporting Technology
Selections.

Specifications: Also available from Supt. of Docs. Spon-
sored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Center for Environmental Research Information. 243p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Separation,
Waste treatment, Meetings.

1288 Pilot-Scale Incinerability Evaluation of Arsenic-and
Lead-Contaminated Soils from Two Superfund Sites

Order Number PB91-226308CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Acurex Corp., Jefferson, AR.; Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab;

1991

Two incineration test programs were conducted at EPA's In-
cineration Research Facility to evaluate the suitability of in-
cineration as an option to treat contaminated Superfund site
soils. The soils from the Purity Oil Sales site in Region 9 are
contaminated with lead, up to several percent sulfur, and, to
a lesser extent, hazardous organic constituents. The soil
from the Baird and McGuire Superfund site in Region 1 is
contaminated with pesticides, arsenic, and, to a lesser
extent, lead. Incineration could be considered applicable to
the treatment of the three Purity Oil Sales site soiis tested
based on effective semivolatilc organic decontamination, in-
compliance (with federal standards) particulate emissions,
and low S02/S03 emissions. However, these tests results
suggest that the resulting kiln ash would be a toxicity charac-
teristic hazardous waste due to its leachable lead content.
Similarly, for the Baird and McGuire site soils, organic decon-
tamination of the tested materials was effective. Between 36
and 76 percent of the measured arsenic and between 69
and 94 percent of the measured lead were discharged in the
kiln bottom ash depending on kiln temperature. The low
TCLP teachability of the lead in the kiln bottom ash was not
affected by the test variables kiln temperatures and kiln exit
flue gas 02. However, the ash arsenic resulting from high
excess air operation was significantly less leachable than
that from low excess air operation, and was somewhat more
leachable at high temperature than at low temperature.

Specifications: Proceedings of the Incineration Conference,
Knoxville, TN., May 13-17, 1991. Sponsored by Environmen-
tal Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engi-
neering Lab. 12 p.

Subject index keywords: Waste disposal, Soil contamina-
tion, incineration, Superfund, Air pollution control.

1289 Pilot-Scale Incineration of Contaminated Sludges
from the Bofors-Nobel Superfund Site

Order Number PB93-141034CDH, price: PC A17/MF A03
Acurex Environmental Corp., Jefferson, AR.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab; Jan 93

A detailed test program was performed at the U.S. EPA In-
cineration Research Facility to help determine the effective-
ness of incineration in treating two contaminated lagoon
sludges from the Bofors-Nobel Superfund Site in Muskegon,
Ml. The sludges tested were contaminated with various or-
ganic contaminants and trace metals. Three incineration
tests were conducted for each sludge, for a total of six tests,
in the facility's rotary kiln incineration system. Test results
suggested that incineration under the conditions tested rep-
resented an effective treatment option for both sludges. Par-
ticulate emissions at the scrubber exit were high during incin-
eration of one of the sludges while cadmium and lead collec-
tion efficiencies were low. This suggested the wet scrubber
system may not be an appropriate choice for air pollution
control.

Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
378p.

Subject index keywords: Sludge, Incinerators, Pilot plants,
Waste treatment, Incineration Research Facility, Superfund.

1290 Pilot-Scale Incineration of Contaminated Soil from
the Purity Oil Sales and McColl Superfund Sites

Order Number PB92-105857CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Acurex Corp., Jefferson, AR.; Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab;
Nov 91

An incineration test program was conducted at the U.S. Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency's Incineration Research Facility
to evaluate the potential of incineration as an option to treat
contaminated soils at the Purity Oil Sales Superfund site in
Fresno, California, and the McColl Superfund site in Fuller-
ton, California. The soils from these sites are contaminated
with up to several percent sulfur and with some hazardous
organic contaminates. The Purity site has lead contamination
from 760 to 10,200 mg/kg. The tests were conducted in a
pilot-scale rotary kiln using a single stage ionizing wet scrub-
ber for exhaust particulate control. Test results suggest that
incineration would be an acceptable treatment option for the
McColl site materials.

Specifications: See also PB88-239223 and PB89-148076.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 74p.

Subject Index keywords: Soils, Incinerators, Waste treat-
ment, Hazardous materials.

245

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION;
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents

1291 Pilot-Scale Incineration of PCB-Contaminated
Sediments from the Hot Spot of the New Bedford
Harbor Superfund Site

Order Number PB92-227321CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Acurex Corp., Jefferson, AR. Incineration Research Facility.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; 1992

Specifications; Proceedings of the 1992 Incineration Con-
ference, Alburquerque, NM„ May 11-14, 1992. See also
PB92-178953. Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
10p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Sediments, Waste dis-
posal, Incineration.

1292 Pilot-Scale Incineration of PCB-Contaminated
Sediments from the New Bedford Harbor Hot Spot
Superfund Site

Order Number PB92-178953CDH, price: PC A09/MF A03
Acurex Corp., Jefferson, AR. Incineration Research Facility.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Apr 92

Testing was performed at the EPA's Incineration Research
Facility (IRF) to determine the incinerability of contaminated
marine sediment from the Hot Spot in the New Bedford
Harbor Superfund Site. The contaminants at the site were
PCBs, at concentrations up to <200,000 mg/kg, and metals,
chiefly cadmium, chromium, copper, and lead, at concentra-
tions up to several hundred mg/kg. Sediments were inciner-
ated without dewatering. Tests were run on sediments spiked
with pure PCB transformer fluid and a brief period of oper-
ation with native sediment alone, or unspiked. Kiln exit gas
temperature was varied from 824 to 984C (1515 to 1803F).
Greater than 99.9999% Destruction and Removal Efficiency
was achieved at both kiln temperatures with the afterburner
operated at 1200C (2206F), but the treated sediment was
still PCB-contaminated. The kiln ash accounted for about 80
to 90% of the discharged amount of copper and chromium
at both kiln temperatures. Kiln ash discharge accounted for
53% (low kiln temperature) and 20% (high kiln temperature)
of the lead and 61% (low kiln temperature) and 10 to 20%
(high kiln temperature) of the cadmium. Test results suggest
that incineration would be an effective treatment option for
the site sediments. However, sediment dewatering prior to in-
cineration and/or incinerating for a longer kiln solids resi-
dence time might be required to produce a treated sediment
not contaminated by PCBs.

Specifications: See also PB84-128677, PB87-120291 and
PB91 -120006. Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
194p.

Subject Index keywords; Waste disposal, Incineration, Haz-
ardous materials, Superfund, Sediments.

1293 Potential for Joint Research between EPA and the
U.S. Army

Order Number PB93-149227CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; 1992

The environmental problems being faced by the US Environ-
mental Protection Agency (EPA) and the US Army are close-
ly related, and the research needed to address them over-
laps in many areas. The paper presents an overview of the
hazardous waste site remediation research programs being
conducted by EPA's Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory
(RREL) and proposes a number of areas where joint efforts
between the two agencies could be mutually beneficial. EPA
has established a policy of encouraging the use of innovative
technologies that both reduce the quantity of contaminant to
be handled and also destroy harmful contaminants. Several
technologies, including soil washing, soil vapor extraction,
thermal desorption, solvent extraction and soil flushing are of
special interest. The RREL has established capabilities for
treatability studies and other research endeavors at a
number of its locations. EPA also continues to foster the use
of innovative technologies through its Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation (SITE) program. In addition, EPA has
established a technology transfer program available to other
agencies involving both manuals/documents and training
personnel. The authors welcome future contacts by Army
personnel interested in sharing environmental projects.
Specifications: See also PB90-182486, PB90-249772 and
PB92-166859. Presented at the 1992 U.S. Army Annual R
and D Symposium, Williamsburg, VA., June 1992. 26p.
Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Remedial
action, Research, Waste management, Technology transfer.

1294 Resources Conservation Company B.E.S.T. (Trade
Name) Solvent Extraction Technology: Application
Analysis Report

Order Number PB94-105434CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Jun 93

The report summarizes the findings of an evaluation of the
Basic Extractive Sludge Treatment (B.E.S.T.) solvent extrac-
tion technology developed by Resources Conservation Com-
pany (RCC). During the demonstration test, the B.E.S.T.
system was used to treat composited sediments from two
areas of the Grand Calumet River. Contaminant concentra-
tion reductions of 96 percent for total polynuclear aromatic
hydrocarbons (PAHs) and greater than 99 percent for total
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were achieved for Sedi-
ment A. Contaminant concentration reductions of greater
than 99 percent for total PAHs and greater than 99 percent
for total PCBs were achieved for Sediment B. Removal effi-
ciencies in excess of 98 percent were realized for both sedi-
ments for oil and grease (O&G).

246

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents

Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
59p,

Subject Index keywords: Solvent extraction, Sludge treat-
ment, Hazardous materials.

1295 Retech, Inc., Plasma Centrifugal Furnace:
Applications Analysis Report

Order Number PB92-218791CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., San Diego, CA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Jun 92

The document is an evaluation of the performance of the
Retech Inc. Plasma Centrifugal Furnace (PCF) and its appli-
cability as a treatment technique for soils contaminated with
organic and/or inorganic compounds. Both the technical and
economic aspects of the technology were examined. A dem-
onstration of the Retech furnace was conducted under the
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program at the
Department of Energy's Component Development and Inte-
gration Facility in Butte, Montana. Operational data, along
with sampling and analysis information, were carefully com-
piled to establish a data base against which other available
data, as well as the vendor's claims for the technology, have
been compared and evaluated. Conclusions concerning the
technology's suitability for use in immobilizing contaminants
in the feed soil were reached, and extrapolations regarding
applications at other sites with different contaminants and
soil types were made.

Specifications: See also PB92-216035 and PB92-216043.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 52p.

Subject index keywords: Plasma furnaces, Incinerators,
Waste disposal, Hazardous materials, Combustion efficiency,
Technology utilization.

1296 Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory Site
Remediation Technical Support Program: FY92 Annual
Report

Order Number PB93-217651CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Mar 93

The Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory is responsible for
planning, implementing, and managing research, develop-
ment, and demonstration programs to provide an authorita-
tive, defensible engineering basis in support of the policies,
programs, and regulations of the EPA with respect to drink-
ing water, wastewater, pesticides, toxic substances, solid and
hazardous wastes, and Superfund-related activities. The pub-
lication is one of the products of that research and provides
a vital communication link between the researcher and the
user community. The report summarizes the activities and
accomplishments of the Laboratory in providing technical
support to EPA Regional Offices and others on contaminated
soil site remediation engineering problems.

Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
19p.

Subject Index keywords: US EPA, Hazardous materials,
Test facilities, Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory.

1297 Rotating Biological Contactors. Engineering Bulletin

Order Number PB92-235936CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 92
Rotating biological contactors employ aerobic fixed-film treat-
ment to degrade either organic and/or nitrogenous (ammo-
nia-nitrogen) constituents present in aqueous waste streams.
Fixed-film systems provide a surface to which the biomass
can adhere. Treatment is achieved as the waste passes by
the media, enabling fixed-film systems to acclimate biomass
capable of degrading organic waste. Fixed-film rotating bio-
logical contactor reactors provide a surface to which soil or-
ganisms can adhere; many indigenous soil organisms are ef-
fective degraders of hazardous wastes. The bulletin provides
information on the technology applicability, the technology
limitations, a description of the technology, the types of re-
siduals produced, site requirements, the latest performance
data, the status of the technology, and sources of further in-
formation.

Specifications: See also PB87-146296. 10p.

Subject index keywords: Biological treatment, Superfund,
Waste treatment, Liquid wastes, Rotating biological contac-
tors.

1298 Selection of Control Technologies for Remediation
of Lead Battery Recycling Sites. (Engineering Bulletin)

Order Number PB93-121333CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc., Edison, NJ.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 92

The objective of this bulletin is to provide remedial project
managers (RPMs), potentially responsible parties (PRPs),
and their supporting contractors with information to facilitate
the selection of treatment alternatives and cleanup services
at lead battery recycling sites (LBRS). This bulletin con-
denses and updates the information presented in the EPA
technical resource document (TRD) entitled, 'Selection of
Control Technologies for Remediation of Lead Battery Recy-
cling Sites,' PB92-114537, July 1991. This bulletin consoli-
dates useful information on LBRS, such as the following: de-
scription of types of operations commonly conducted, and
wastes generated at LBRS; technologies implemented or se-
lected for LBRS remediation; case studies of treatability stud-
ies on LBRS wastes; past experience regarding the recycla-
bility of materials that are found at LBRS; and profiles of po-
tentially applicable innovative treatment technologies.
Specifications: See also PB92-114537. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 20p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Waste management, Lead acid batteries, Waste treatment.

1299 SITE Demonstration of the American Combustion
Pyretron Oxygen-Enhanced Burner

Order Number PB91-196246CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; c1989

A demonstration of the American Combustion Pyretron (TM)
oxygen-enhanced burner was conducted under the Super-
fund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) program. The
Demonstration was conducted at the U.S. EPA's Combustion
Research Facility (CRF) in Jefferson, Arkansas. An eight
week test series was conducted which involved burning a

247

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents

mixture of listed waste K087 with contaminated soil from the
Stringfelfow Acid Pits under both oxygen enhancement and
air-only conditions. Performance under both modes of oper-
ation was compared. Results show that the Pyretron operat-
ing with oxygen enhancement could meet RCRA emissions
limitations at a throughput rate double that for air-only oper-
ation. Scrubber liquor and kiln ash from the tests contained
no detectable levels of contaminants from either waste
stream. (Copyright (c) 1989 Air and Waste Management As-
sociation.)

Specifications: Pub, in Jnl. of the Air and Waste Manage-
ment Association, v39 n2 p149-153 Feb 89. 7p.

Subject index keywords: Incinerators, Air pollution abate-
ment, Waste disposal, Air pollution control equipment, Super-
fund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program, Pyretron
burners.

1300 SITE Demonstration of the Basic Extractive Sludge
Treatment Process

Order Number PB94-1C1805CDH, price: PC A02/MF AC1
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; c1993

The Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Pro-
gram planned and executed a pilot-scale evaluation of the
B.E.S.T. process on sediment samples obtained from the
Grand Calumet River. Two separate sampling locations were
selected based upon previous data. One location had sedi-
ments with total polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) concentra-
tions averaging 10 mg/kg, and total polynuclear aromatic hy-
drocarbon (PAH) concentrations averaging 520 mg/kg. The
other location had sediments with average total PCB and
PAH concentrations of 427 mg/kg and 72,000 mg/kg re-
spectively. Results showed that, of the samples which had
low original contamination concentrations, 96% of the PAHs
and 99% of the PCBs were removed following seven se-
quential extractions. Treated samples which had high original
contaminant concentrations were found to have removal effi-
ciencies of 99% for both PAHs and PCBs. (Copyright (c)
1993 Air & Waste Management Association.)

Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of Air and Waste Management
Association, v43 n9 p1274-1279 Sep 93, See also P393-
131795, Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 8p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Water pollution con-
trol, Sludge treatment.

1301 SITE Demonstration of the CF Systems Organics
Extraction System

Order Number PB91-145110CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab.; Science Applications
International Corp,, McLean, VA.* "Vermont Agency of
Natural Resources, Waterbury; c1990
The CF Systems Organic Extraction System was used to
remove PCBs from contaminated sediment dredged from the
New Bedford Harbor. This work was done as part of a field
demonstration under the Superfund Innovative Technology
Evaluation (SITE) program. The purpose of the SITE program
is to provide an independent and objective evaluation of in-
novative processes. The purpose of this paper is to present
the results of the SITE demonstration of this technology. Re-
sults of the demonstration tests show that the system, which
uses high pressure liquefied propane, successfully removed

PCBs from contaminated sediments in New Bedford Harbor.
Removal efficiencies for all test runs exceeded 70%. Some
operational problems occured during the demonstration
which may have affected the efficiency with which PCBs
were removed from the dredged sediment. Large amounts of
residues were generated from the demonstration. Costs for
using this process are estimated to be between $150/ton
and $450/ton. (Copyright (c) 1990—Air & Waste Management
Association.)

Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of Air and Waste Management
Association, v40 n6 p926-931 Jun 90. Prepared in coopera-
tion with Science Applications International Corp., McLean,
VA., and Vermont Agency of Natural Resources, Waterbury.
8p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste treatment,
Dredge spoil, Water pollution control, Solvent extraction, Pol-
ychlorinated biphenyls.

1302 Site Emerging Technologies: Bioscrubber for
Removing Hazardous Organic Emissions from Soil,

Water and Air Decontamination Processes

Order Number PB93-227205CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Aluminum Co. of America, Pittsburgh, PA.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab; Aug 93

An engineered biofilter was developed to digest hazardous
organic emissions from soil, water and air decontamination
processes. A bench scale unit was tested for over 11
months for the removal of low levels of toluene in air under
the SITE Emerging Technology Program. The bioscrubber
contains a selected activated carbon medium to support mi-
crobial growth. The bioscrubber was designed for large vol-
umes of air streams containing trace volatile organics.
Almost complete removal of hazardous organics was demon-
strated. Comparing with other biofilters using compost or
other naturally occurred media, the use of activated carbon
in the bioscrubber enhanced the degradation efficiency sub-
stantially for the test performed.

Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH, Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
70p.

Subject index keywords: Filtration, Microorganisms, Scrub-
bers, Air pollution control.

1303 SITE Emerging Technologies Project: Babcock and
Wilcox Cyclone Vitrification

Order Number PB93-163038CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
Babcock and Wilcox Co., Alliance, OH. Contract Research
Div.; Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Mar 93

The Babcock and Wilcox 6 million Btu/hr pilot cyclone fur-
nace was successfully used In a 2-year SITE Emerging Tech-
nology project to melt and vitrify and EPA Synthetic Soil
Matrix (SSM) spiked with 7,000 ppm lead, 1,000 ppm cadmi-
um, and 1,500 ppm chromium. An advantage of vitrification
over other thermal treatment technologies is that in addition
to destruction of organic wastes, the resulting vitrified prod-
uct captures and does not leach non-volatiie heavy metals.
Indeed, when operated at 50 to 150 Ib/hr of dry SSM feed,
and from 100-300 Ib/hr of wet SSM feed, the cyclone tech-
nology was able to produce a non- eachable product (as
measured by TCLP) from the hazardous soil. From 95 to 97
percent of the dry, input SSM was incorporated within the

248

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents

slag. Stable cyclone operation was achieved during the 2-
year project which processed over 6 tons of clean, unspiked
SSM and 5 tons of spiked SSM. During the thermal vitrifica-
tion process, the heavy metals in the slag was found to in-
crease with increasing feed rate and with decreasing metal
volatility. The treatment of the synthetic soil matrix resulted
in a volume reduction of 25-35 percent (dry basis). Vitrifica-
tion results in an easily-crushed, glassy product
Specifications; See also PB90-172545, PB91-120006 and
PB93-145621. Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
137p.

Subject index keywords: Waste treatment, Vitrification,
Hazardous materials, Remedial action, Heat treatment, Su-
pcrfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program, Innova-
tive treatment technologies.

1304 Small Systems Meet Superfund Challenge with
Point-of-Entry Treatment Units

Order Number PB93-1411Q9CDH, price; PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab.; NSF International, Ann Arbor,
Mi."PSARA Technologies, Inc., Cincinnati, OH; Dec 91
Several small systems and individual homeowners have been
faced with the task of treating their groundwater that has
been contaminated with various organic contaminants. Con-
tamination is such that the locations described in this presen-
tation have been designated Federal Superfund sites under-
going emergency or remedial actions. These sites have uti-
lized point-of-entry water treatment devices to treat their
groundwater. The devices used include: single and dual
granular activated carbon (GAC) columns; air stripping in
series with GAC; and ozone/UV followed by GAC. Cost (cap-
ital and operating) contaminant removal performance, GAC
breakthrough and disinfection byproduct formation will be
discussed for several Superfund or state led cleanup actions.
Specifications: Proceedings of the Hazardous Materials
Control/Superfund Conference, Washington, DC., December
3-5, 1991. See also PB89-195010. Prepared in cooperation
with NSF International, Ann Arbor, ML, and PSARA Technol-
ogies, Inc., Cincinnati, OH. 9p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Water treatment, Pota-
ble water, Waste disposal, Hazardous materials, Small sys-
tems, Point of entry treatment.

1305 Solvent Extraction Processes: A Survey of Systems
in the SITE Program

Order Number PB93-131795CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab.; Science Applications
International Corp., Cincinnati, OH; c1992
Solvent extraction of contaminated soils, sludges, and sedi-
ments has been successfully completed at a number of Su-
perfund sites. Each commercialized process uses a unique
operating system to extract organic contaminants from
solids. These operating systems may be classified by the
properties of the solvents each utilizes: (1) standard sol-
vents, (2) near-critical fluids/liquified gases, and (3) critical
solution temperature solvents. The paper discusses pretreat-
ment and posttreatment requirements, and discusses the op-
erating systems of the solvent extraction system currently in
the Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Pro-
gram. Future demonstrations of these technologies by the
U.S. EPA's Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Pro-

gram will provide additional information regarding the efficacy
of these processes. Copyright (c) 1992 Air and Waste Man-
agement Association).

Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of the Air and Waste Manage-
ment Association, v42 n8 p1118-1121 Aug 92. Prepared in
cooperation with Science Applications International Corp.,
Cincinnati, OH. 7p.

Subject index keywords: Solvent extraction, Superfund,
Soil treatment, Waste treatment, Organic compounds.

1306 Solvent Extraction Treatment

Order Number PB91 -228015CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Solvent extraction does not destroy wastes, but is a means
of separating hazardous contaminants from soils, sludges,
and sediments, thereby reducing the volume of the hazard-
ous waste that must be treated. Generally it is used as one
in a series of unit operations, and can reduce the overall
cost for managing a particular site. It Is applicable to organic
wastes and is generally not used for treating inorganics and
metals. The technology uses an organic chemical as a sol-
vent and differs from soil washing, which generally uses
water or water with wash improving additives. During 1989,
the technology was one of the selected remedies at six Su-
perfund sites. Commercial-scale units are in operation. There
is no clear solvent extraction technology leader by virtue of
the solvent employed, type of equipment used, or mode of
operation. The final determination of the lowest cost alterna-
tive will be more site specific than process equipment domi-
nated. Vendors should be contacted to determine the avail-
ability of a unit for a particular site. The bulletin provides in-
formation on the technology applicability, the types of residu-
als produced, the latest performance data, site requirements,
the status of the technology, and sources for further informa-
tion.

Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response. 10p.

Subject index keywords: Solvent extraction, Hazardous
materials, Waste treatment, Materials recovery, Organic com-
pounds.

1307 Summary of GIS Support to Superfund

Order Number PB93-963506CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Jun 93
The document describes four Superfund-related projects in-
volving the development of Geographic Information System
applications. It identifies the role of GIS technology within the
overall Superfund process and discusses the components of
GIS and integration with the Superfund process.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 62p,

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Geographic informa-
tion systems, Site surveys.

249

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents

1308 Superfund Engineering Issue: Issues Affecting the
Applicability and Success of Remedial/Removal
Incineration Projects

Order Number PB92-109081CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
PEI Associates, Inc., Cincinnati, OH.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency
and Remedial Response; Feb 91

Incineration has been a recommended method for disposing
of hazardous materials, and its use in the Superfund Program
is increasing rapidly. It has become one of the most often
selected methods for treating hazardous constituents found
at Superfund sites. Because of the increased reliance of Su-
perfund decision makers on incineration, the Engineering
Forum has identified the informed evaluation of incineration
as a remedy, and the issues inherent in its implementation
as a high priority. The paper was prepared by RREL's Engi-
neering and Treatment Technical Support Center, under the
technical direction of Laurel Staley (RREL) and Paul Leonard
(Region III), with the support of the Superfund Technical
Support Project.

Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response. 30p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action, Haz-
ardous materials, Waste disposal, Incineration.

1309 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Annual Report to Congress 1992

Order Number PB94-123874CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Oct 93

The SITE Program was created to meet the increased
demand for alternative hazardous waste treatment technol-
ogies and was the first major program for demonstrating and
evaluating full-scale, innovative treatment technologies at
hazardous waste sites. The report discusses the Program's
progress and accomplishments over the past fiscal year, out-
lines the Program's impact, and catalogues current projects
being undertaken.

Specifications: See also PB93-126613. 56p.

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Demonstration pro-
grams, SITE(Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation).

1310 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program Demonstration Plan for Westing house Bio-
Analytic Systems Pentachlorophenol Immunoassays

Order Number PB92-17019QCDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
Lockheed Engineering and Sciences Co., Inc., Las Vegas,
NV.; Environmental Monitoring Systems Lab., Las Vegas,
NV.* Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV; 14
Apr 92

The plan provides a detailed design and description of the
demonstration and evaluation program for the Westinghouse
Bio-Analytic Systems immunoassay technologies specific for
the analysis of pentachlorophenol. The immunoassays meas-
ure parts per billion concentrations of pentachlorophenol in
water. The demonstration is being conducted under the Su-
perfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program. It
is expected that proper execution of the demonstration plan
will provide information that enables data users and review-
ers to assess the performance of the technology in terms of
its usefulness and limitations for the Superfund Program. The
main focus of the demonstration is to evaluate on site a se-
miquantitative immunoassay field analysis kit for its utility as

a rapid field screening tool. The results obtained from the
field kit analyses will be compared to those obtained from a
quantitative high-sample-capacity plate immunoassay also
developed by Westinghouse Bio-Analytic Systems. In addi-
tion, both immunoassay techniques will be compared to the
standard gas chromatography/mass spectrometry procedure
for pentachlorophenol determination. The quality assurance
plan for the demonstration is provided in an appendix.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Environmental
Monitoring Systems Lab., Las Vegas, NV. Sponsored by En-
vironmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV. 157p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Pentachlorophenol,
Immunoassay, Westinghouse, Chemical water pollutants, Su-
perfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program(SITE).

1311 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Progress and Accomplishments, Fiscal Year

1989. A Third Report to Congress

Order Number PB90-216516CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 90
This is the third Report to Congress on the Superfund Inno-
vative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program. The report
summarizes the progress, accomplishments, and results of
the SITE Program through 1989. Field demonstrations for
eight projects have been completed since publication of the
first report. The second Report to Congress focuses on the
completed demonstrations and provides performance data
and results. The process used to assess the economic feasi-
bility of each demonstration is presented. The report de-
scribes the progress of the components that were initiated
during the first year of the program and the two components
implemented during the past year. Another difference be-
tween the two reports is that the second Report to Congress
identifies the impediments encountered during the first 3
years of the program and describes the refinements that
EPA has implemented to address these problems and im-
prove the effectiveness of the SITE Program.

Specifications: See also PB89-215214. 83p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment, Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program,
Waste management, Remedial action.

1312 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Progress and Accomplishments, Fiscal Year

1990. A Fourth Report to Congress

Order Number PB92-224799CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 91
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) established
the Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Pro-
gram in 1986, following passage of the Superfund Amend-
ments and Reauthorization Act (SARA). The Program's
progress and accomplishments for Fiscal Year 1990 are pre-
sented in four sections in this Fourth Report to Congress.
Section 1 presents an overview of the SITE Program includ-
ing the statutory authority and history of the program and the
four program components and goals. Section 2 discusses
the use of innovative alternative technologies for hazardous
waste site remediation and the impact the SITE Program is
having on their increased use. Section 3 presents the SITE
Program's progress and accomplishments over the past year
and specific goals for the coming year. Section 4 proposes

250

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents

various program changes and recommends statutory
changes that can enhance SITE'S ability to meet its overall
objectives. Several examples of program products are ap-
pended to this report to highlight the technology transfer as-
pects of the SITE Program.

Specifications: See also PB90-216516, 86p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Remedial
action, Technology innovation, Waste treatment, Superfund
Innovative Technology Evaluation Program, Innovative treat-
ment technologies.

1313 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Progress and Accomplishments Fiscal Year
1991. A 5th Report to Congress

Order Number PB93-126813CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Oct 92

The Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) pro-
gram was the first major program for demonstrating and
evaluating full-scale innovative treatment technologies at
hazardous waste sites. Having concluded its fifth year, the
SITE program is recognized as a leading advocate of innova-
tive technology development and commercialization for haz-
ardous waste treatment and remediation. In addition, through
the demonstration of innovative monitoring and measurement
technologies, EPA is promoting faster, more cost-effective
site characterization and post-cleanup monitoring methods
for Superfund and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
(RCRA) corrective action sites. The fifth report to Congress
documents the impact of the SITE program through discuss-
ing the program's progress and accomplishments over the
past year. The report also sets goals for the coming years
and makes specific recommendations on achieving these
goals.

Specifications: See also PB92-224799. 82p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment, Remedial action, Innovative treatment technologies,
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program.

1314 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Spring Update to the Technology Profiles.
Fourth Edition

Order Number PB92-233121CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 92
The SITE Program promotes the development and imple-
mentation of innovative treatment technologies that (1)
reduce the toxicity, mobility, or volume of hazardous waste,
and (2) monitor the nature and extent of hazardous waste
site contamination. To accomplish these tasks, the SITE Pro-
gram consists of four interrelated programs: Demonstration
Program; Emerging Technology Program; Monitoring and
Measurement Technologies Program; and Technology Trans-
fer Program.

Specifications: See also PB92-224294. 22p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment, Superfund.

1315 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Technology Profiles, Fifth Edition

Order Number PB93-163053CDH, price: PC A18/MF A04
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Nov 92
The Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Pro-
gram evaluates new and promising treatment technologies
for cleanup of hazardous waste sites. The program was cre-
ated to encourage the development and routine use of inno-
vative treatment technoiogies. The document, prepared be-
tween June and October, 1992, is intended as a guide for
decisionmakers and others interested in technologies in the
SITE Demonstration, Emerging Technology, and Monitoring
and Measurement Technologies Programs. Reference tables
of SITE Program participants precede the individual profiles
and contain EPA and developer contacts. Inquiries about a
specific SITE technology or the SITE Program should be di-
rected to an EPA Project Manager. The two-page profiles are
presented by name of the developer in alphabetical order.
Each profile contains (1) a technology developer and proc-
ess name, (2) a technology description, (3) a discussion of
waste applicability, (4) a project status report, (5) EPA
Project Manager and developer contacts, and (6) a schemat-
ic diagram or photograph of the process. The profiles also
include summaries of demonstration results if available. New
features of this edition include a Table of Media Applicability
and a complete index organized by Waste Media and Con-
taminant.

Specifications: See also PB92-224294. 413p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Remedial
action, Waste treatment, Superfund Innovative Technology
Evaluation Program, Innovative treatment technologies.

1316 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Technology Profiles, Fourth Edition

Order Number PB92-224294CDH, price: PC A14/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Nov 91

The Superfund innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Pro-
gram, now in its sixth year, is an integral part of EPA's re-
search into alternative cleanup methods for hazardous waste
sites around the nation. Under the SITE Program, EPA
enters into cooperative agreements with innovative technolo-
gy developers. The document profiles 129 demonstration,
emerging, and monitoring and measurement technologies
being evaluated under the SITE Program. Each technology
profile contains a description of the technology, a discussion
of its applicability to various wastes, an update on its devel-
opment or demonstration status, any available demonstration
results, and demonstration and technology contacts. This
document is intended for environmental decision makers and
other interested individuals involved in hazardous waste site
cleanup.

Specifications: See also PB90-249756. 216p.

Subject index keywords: Waste management, Technology
innovation, Remedial action, Superfund Innovative Technolo-
gy Evaluation Program, Cleanup operations.

251

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents

1317 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Technology Profiles, November 1989

Order Number PB90-249756CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
PRC Environmental Management, Inc., McLean, VA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 89
The document profiles fifty-two demonstration and emerging
technologies being evaluated under the SITE program. Each
technology profile contains a description of the technology; a
discussion of its applicability to various wastes; and update
on its development or demonstration status; and any avail-
able demonstration results. The document is intended for
EPA regional decision-makers and other interested individ-
uals involved in hazardous waste site cleanups.
Specifications: See also report for 1988, PB9Q-132690.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. 129p.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Site sur-
veys, Superfund, Remedial action, Technology assessment,
Waste management, Superfund Innovative Technology Eval-
uation Program, SITE program.

1318 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Technology Profiles, Sixth Edition

Order Number PB94-123858CDH, price; PC A19/MF A04
PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Nov 93
The Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Pro-
gram, now in its eighth year, is an integral part of EPA's re-
search into alternative cleanup methods for hazardous waste
sites around the nation. Under the SITE Program, EPA
enters into cooperative agreements with technology develop-
ers. These developers refine their innovative technologies at
bench- or pilot-scale and may demonstrate them, with sup-
port from EPA, at hazardous waste sites. The document pro-
files 170 demonstration, emerging, and monitoring and meas-
urement technologies being evaluated under the SITE Pro-
gram. Each profile describes the technology; discusses its
applicability to various wastes; discusses its development or
demonstration status and demonstration results, if available;
and provides demonstration and technology contacts.
Specifications: See also PB89-132690. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 438p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste treatment, SITE(Superfund Innovative Technology
Evaluation).

1319 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE):
Demonstration Bulletin. Flame Reactor, Horsehead
Resource Development Company, Inc

Order Number PB92-235613CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 91
The Horsehead Resource Development Company, Inc.
(HRD) Flame Reactor is a patented and proven high temper-
ature thermal process designed to safely treat industrial resi-
dues and wastes containing metals. During processing, the
waste material is introduced into the hottest portion of the
Flame Reactor, where the wastes are subjected to a very hot
reducing gas {greater than 2000 C) produced from the com-
bustion of solid or gaseous hydrocarbon fuels in oxygen-en-
riched air. The metal vapors further react and cool in the

combustion chamber and cooling system to produce a metal-
enriched oxide that is collected in a baghouse. The resulting
metal oxides can be recycled to recover the metals. The
amount of waste reduction to slag and oxide depends on the
chemical and physical properties of the waste material.
Specifications: 4p.

Subject Index keywords: Thermal reactors, Waste treat-
ment, High temperature tests, Slags, Superfund innovative
technology evaluation.

1320 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE)
Program Evaluation Report for Antox STX Water Screen
(BTX Immunoassay)

Order Number PB93-218337CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Lockheed Engineering and Sciences Co., Las Vegas, NV.;
Environmental Monitoring Systems Lab., Las Vegas, NV; Jun
93

The results of a demonstration of a portable immunoassay
for the detection of benzene, toluene, and xylene(s) (BTX)
are described in the report. Seventy-nine field samples were
obtained from monitoring wells at several sites with gasoline
contaminated ground water. Sample splits were analyzed on-
site by the BTX immunoassay and in the laboratory by gas
chromatography (GC) using EPA Method 8020. The BTX im-
munoassay was rapid and simple to use. It performed well in
identifying high level contamination and gasoline contaminat-
ed samples having BTX concentrations greater than 100
ppb. It did not fully meet the claims of the developer of iden-
tifying contamination levels down to 25 ppb BTX. Two field
samples determined by GC to have between 25 and 100 ppb
BTX failed to be classified correctly by the immunoassay.
Results from quality assurance samples with BTX concentra-
tions of 2.5, 25, and 100 ppb also showed that false negative
results would be expected at higher than a 5 percent rate
when BTX contamination levels were between 25 and 100
ppb. However, for samples with higher BTX levels, the im-
munoassay gave excellent results. Two field samples yielded
false positive results compared to GC values, but these sam-
ples showed signs of low-level gasoline contamination.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Monitoring
Systems Lab., Las Vegas, NV. 103p.

Subject index keywords: Water pollution detection, Ground
water, Immunoassay.

1321 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (Site)
Report for the Westinghouse Bio-Analytic Systems
Pentachlorophenol (PCP) Immunoassays

Order Number PB92-188713CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Lockheed Engineering and Sciences Co., Inc., Las Vegas,
NV. Environmental Programs Office.; Environmental
Monitoring Systems Lab., Las Vegas, NV; May 92
The results of the demonstration of two Westinghouse Bio-
Analytic Systems (WBAS) immunoassay technologies are de-
scribed in the report. The immunoassays measure parts per
billion concentrations of pentachlorophenol in environmental
water samples. The study was conducted under the Super-
fund innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program and
designed to evaluate the ruggedness and utility of a semi-
quantitative immunoassay field kit. Results obtained from the
field kit were compared to those obtained from a quantita-
tive, high-sample-capacity plate immunoassay. The results of
the WBAS immunoassay demonstration support the conclu-
sion that the field immunoassay is a useful screening tool.

252

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents

The demonstration verified that the method can provide qual-
itative or semiquantitative screening information. Although
the results were more variable than had been anticipated,
the incorporation of additional procedural precautions and
carefully chosen quality control acceptance criteria for on-
site analysis could improve performance substantially. Both
Immunoassays produced results biased high compared to
the GC/MS results, but the tendency was not large and may
have been partly due to loss during sample extraction (EPA
Method 3510} prior to analysis by gas chromatography/mass
spectrometry. The detection of structurally related com-
pounds by the immunoassays may have also contributed to
the high bias. The results indicate that the plate immunoas-
say is an accurate and precise method for quantitating pen-
tachlorophenol in water.

Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Monitoring
Systems Lab., Las Vegas, NV. 109p.

Subject index keywords: Pentachlorophenol.

1322 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation: The
Delaware SITE Study, 1989

Order Number PB92-125749CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
NSI Technology Services Corp., Research Triangle Park,
NC.; Battetle Columbus Labs., OH.'Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response; Jan 92

The 1989 Delaware Superfund Innovative Technology Eval-
uation (SITE) Field Study was a cooperative effort between
the Atmospheric Research and Exposure Assessment Labo-
ratory and the Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory
located in Las Vegas, NV. The SITE was established to sat-
isfy the mandate of the Superfund Amendments and Reau-
thorization Act of 1986 to demonstrate alternative or innova-
tive treatment and site characterization technologies. As
such, the program provides for the predemonstration testing
of new monitoring technologies. A number of new technol-
ogies including sector sampling, temporal profile analysis,
open air long path monitoring, and fence-line dosimetry ware
employed in the 1989 study. The report documents the suc-
cessful use of these techniques and shows their potential to
provide the Agency and others with improved, cost-effective
means to monitor the air exposure pathway during Superfund
site assessment and remediation.

Specifications; Prepared in cooperation with Battelle Co-
lumbus Labs., OH. Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response. 174p.

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Air pollution sampling,
Air pollution detection, Waste disposal, Volatile organic com-
pounds.

1323 Survey of Materials-Handling Technologies Used at
Hazardous Waste Sites

Order Number PB91-921283CDH, price: PC A11/MF AQ2
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jun 91
The study summarizes the types of debris, material, and con-
taminants found at Superfund and other hazardous waste
sites and the materials-handling equipment and general pro-
cedures used to perform site restoration and cleanup. The
report provides the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) with information on state-of-the-art materials-handling
equipment and procedures useful for addressing difficult,
she-specific, materials-handling problems.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Materials
handling, Site surveys, Technology utilization.

1324 Synopses of Federal Demonstrations of Innovative
Site Remediation Technologies

Order Number PB93-144111CDH, price: PC A11/MF A03
Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC,
Technology Innovation Office; Aug 92
The collection of abstracts, compiled by the Federal Remedi-
ation Technology Roundtable, describes field demonstrations
of innovative technologies to treat hazardous waste. This
document updates and expands information presented in the
first edition of the collection which was published in 1991.
The collection is intended to be an information resource for
hazardous waste site project managers for assessing the
availability and viability of innovative technologies for treating
contaminated ground water, soils, and sludge. This document
represents a starting point in the review of technologies
available for application to hazardous waste sites. This com-
pendium should not be looked upon as a sole source for this
information -- it does not represent all innovative technol-
ogies nor all technology demonstrations performed by these
agencies. Only Federally sponsored studies and demonstra-
tions that have tested innovative remedial technologies with
site specific wastes under realistic conditions as a part of
large pilot- or full-scale field demonstrations are included.
Those studies included represent all that were provided to
the Federal Remediation Technology Roundtable at the time
of publication. Information collection efforts are ongoing.
Specifications: See also PB91-921284. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Technology
Innovation Office. 233p.

Subject index keywords: Technology innovation, Remedial
action, Hazardous materials, Waste treatment, Innovative
treatment technologies.

1325 Tech Trends Number 3, December 1990

Order Number PB93-206357CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC,
Technology Innovation Office; Dec 90
The edition of Tech Trends contains an insert, 'Innovations
in Monitoring and Measurement Technologies". In it, EPA's
Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory in Las Vegas
showcases three portable monitoring systems. The EPA En-
vironmental Research Laboratory in Athens, Georgia, high-
lights a multispectral identification technique for nontarget
analytes that improves upon the current low resolution
system. The Athens lab also presents information on alterna-
tives to the Eh Probe for measuring mobility of heavy metals.
Ada introduces BIOPLUME it.

Specifications: See also PB93-206381. 12p.

Subject index keywords; Superfund, Technology invention,
Remedial action, Trends, News media.

253

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents

1326 Tech Trends Number 4, March 1991

Order Number PB93-206365CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC,
Technology Innovation Office; Mar 91
To meet the challenge of cleanup of Superfund sites at fed-
eral facilities, the U.S. Army Toxic and Hazardous Materials
Agency is devising innovative ways to treat wastes on site. In
this issue of Tech Trends, Cpt. Craig Myler tells about an in-
novative Low Temperature Thermal Stripping process to
treat soil contaminated with cleaning solvents and fuels. The
process expends less energy and Is lower in cost than incin-
eration.

Specifications: See also PB93-206373, 6p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Technology invention,

Remedial action, Trends, News media.

1327 Tech Trends Number 5, May 1991

Order Number PB93-206373CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Technology Innovation Office; May 91
The applied technologies journal for Superfund removals and
remedial actions and RCRA corrective actions contains arti-
cles on: Nitrate Enhanced Bioremediation; Debris Washing;
Air Emissions from Soil Excavation; and Chemical Reagent
at Lee Farm.

Specifications: See also PB93-206357. 6p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Technology invention,

Remedial action, Trends.

1328 Tech Trends (Number 8)

Order Number PB92-2219B5CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 92
The Department of Energy (DOE) has developed and dem-
onstrated an in situ air stripping technique that utilizes hori-
zontal wells to remove volatile organic solvents from soil and
groundwater. The demonstration was part of the DOE's Sa-
vannah River Integrated Demonstration Program. At the site,
an abandoned process sewer line leaked trichloroethylene
and tetrachloroethylene into soil and groundwater.
Specifications: 5p.

Subject index keywords: Strippers, Ground water, Water
wells.

1329 Tech Trends Number 9, June 1992

Order Number PB93-206381CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Technology Innovation Office; Jun 92
The applied technologies journal for Superfund removals and
remedial actions and RCRA corrective actions. In the issue,
the authors let you know about upcoming SITE demonstra-
tions you can visit this summer.

Specifications: See also PB93-206365, PB92-221985,
PB93-157626 and PB93-203958. 6p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Technology invention,
Remedial action, Trends, News media.

1330 Tech Trends (Number 10)

Order Number PB93-203958CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Oct 92
Contents: Natural Biodegradation of Fuel Vapors in Unsatu-
rated Zone; Soil Washing Technology Demo at Toronto

Harbor; RCRA Treatability Study Opportunities; ATTIC Yields
Abundant Bioremediation Information; and an insert consist-
ing of a notice on Innovative Thermal Treatment Technol-
ogies: Uses and Applications for Site Remediation (two 4-
hour seminars).

Specifications: See also PB92-221985 and PB93-157627.
Errata sheet inserted. 8p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Waste treatment, Land pollution control, Innovative treatment
technologies.

1331 Tech Trends (Number 11)

Order Number PB93-157626CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Technology Innovation Office; Jan 93
Contents: Extraction process separates organics from
sludges, soils and sediments; Organics desorbed from soil
with low temperature thermal treatment; Evaporation/oxida-
tion system treats a variety of wastewater contaminants; An-
aerobic thermal processor completes second PCB remedi-
ation.

Specifications: See also PB92-221985. 6p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Technology invention.
Remedial action, Trends, Resource Conservation and Recov-
ery Act.

1332 Tech Trends: The Applied Technologies Journal for
Superfund Removals and Remedial Actions and RCRA
Corrective Actions, December 1993

Order Number PB94-149879CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 93
Contents: Pneumatic fracturing increases volatile organic
compound (VOC) extraction rate; Soil washing technology re-
moves organics from fine and coarse grained soil, and; Elec-
tro-osmosis holds promise for in-situ extraction.

Specifications: See also PB93-223196. 5p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,

Treatment innovation.

1333 Tech Trends: The Applied Technologies Journal for
Superfund Removals and Remedial Actions and RCRA
Corrective Actions, May 1993

Order Number PB93-223196CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; May 93
Both the U.S. EPA and Environment Canada have programs
that support emerging innovative technology development
and technical evaluation demonstrations. EPA's Superfund
Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program and Envi-
ronment Canada's Development and Demonstration of Site
Remediation Technologies (DESRT) Program are described
in the study. The X'TRAX(TM) Model 200 Thermal Desorp-
tion System developed by Chemical Waste Management,
Inc., is a low-temperature process designed to separate or-
ganic contaminants from soils, sludges and other solid
media.

Specifications: See also PB93-206381 and PB93-157626.
10p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Technology invention,
Remedial action, Waste treatment, Thermal desorption.

254

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION;
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents

1334 Technical Guidance Document: Construction Quality
Management for Remedial Action and Remedial Design
Waste Containment Systems

Order Number PB93-105625CDH, price: PC A05/MF A02
Hazen and Sawyer, Raleigh, NC.; Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response; Oct 92

The Technical Guidance Document is intended to augment
the numerous construction quality control and construction
quality assurance {CQC and CQA) documents that are avail-
able for materials associated with waste containment sys-
tems developed for Superfund site remediation. In general,
the manual is oriented to the remediation project manager
(RPM) who must administer these projects. This document
reviews the significant physical properties associated with
the construction materials used in waste containment de-
signs and reviews the sampling and acceptance strategies
required for Construction Quality Management. The first
chapter reviews the minimum Federal regulatory require-
ments for waste containment systems. Key elements of
these systems are identified. The second chapter reviews
the key physical properties and conformance tests required
to verify these properties. The third chapter reviews sampling
methods and acceptance criteria that are used to verify key
physical properties during construction.

Specifications: See also PB88-113295. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response. 100p.

Subject index keywords: Remedial action, Hazardous ma-
terials, Superfund, Waste management, Containment, Reme-
dial designs.

1335 Technical Support Services for Superfund Site
Remediation. Second Edition

Order Number PB91-921285CDH, price; PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 90
The Directory (Second Edition) updates and highlights the
significant OSWER and ORD technical assistance programs
that have procedures in place to process requests such as
answering a technical question, providing staff to work on a
problem, or referring callers to the appropriate source.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 73p.

Subject index keywords: Sites, Hazardous materials, Solid
waste disposal, Superfund.

1336 Technology Demonstration Summary, DuPont/
Oberlin Microfiltration System, Palmerton, Pennsylvania.
April-May 1992

Order Number PB92-224351CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Center for
Environmental Research Information; Mar 92
In April and May 1990, the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), under the Superfund Innovative Technology
Evaluation (SITE) program, demonstrated DuPont/Oberlin's
microfiltration system at the Palmerton Zinc Superfund (PZS)
site in Palmerton, Pennsylvania. The microfiltration system
demonstrated at the PZS site was evaluated primarily in
terms of its ability to remove metals (mainly zinc) and partic-
ulates from the contaminated groundwater on site, while pro-

ducing a dry filter cake and filtrate that meet applicable dis-
posal requirements.

Specifications: See also PB92-153410. 9p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Water pollution con-
trol, Remedial action, Zinc, Hazardous materials, Microfiltra-
tion, DuPont/Oberlin Microfiltration Treatment.

1337 Technology Evaluation Report: Babcock and Wilcox
Cyclone Furnace Vitrification Technology. Volume 1

Order Number PB92-222215CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 92

The project consists of an analysis of the Babcock and
Wilcox (B&W) Cyclone Furnace Vitrification process. The
SITE Demonstration took place at the B&W Research and
Development Division in Alliance, Ohio. The vitrification proc-
ess was performed on a synthetic soil matrix (SSM) that was
spiked with known concentrations of semivolatile organic
compounds, metals, and simulated radionuclides. The Dem-
onstration effort was directed at obtaining information on the
performance and cost of the process for use at other sites.
Documentation will consist of two reports. This Technology
Evaluation Report (TER) is contained in two volumes and de-
scribes the field activities and laboratory results.
Specifications: See also Volume 2, PB92-222223. Spon-
sored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 108p.

Subject index keywords: Soil treatment, Vitrification, Haz-
ardous materials, Waste management, Cyclone combustors,
Innovative treatment technologies, Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation.

1338 Technology Evaluation Report: Babcock and Wilcox
Cyclone Furnace Vitrification Technology. Volume 2

Order Number PB92-222223CDH, price: PC A15/MF A03
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 92

The Babcock & Wilcox (B&W) Cyclone Furnace Vitrification
Technology is a treatment process for contaminated soils.
The process was evaluated to determine its ability to destroy
semivolatile organics and to isolate metals and simulated ra-
dionuclides into a non-leachable slag material. The feed ma-
terial for the system was a prepared synthetic soil matrix
(SSM) that was spiked with two organic compounds and six
metals. This volume contains the appendices.

Specifications: See also Volume 1, PB92-222215. Spon-
sored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 328p.

Subject index keywords: Soil treatment, Vitrification, Haz-
ardous materials, Waste management, Cyclone combustors,
Innovative treatment technologies, Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation.

1339 Technology Evaluation Report CHEMFIX
Technologies, Inc., Solidification/Stabilization Process,
Clackamas, Oregon. Volume 2

Order Number PB90-274127CDH, price: PC A21/MF A03
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 90

The project is a field demonstration under the Superfund In-
novative Technology Evaluation program and designed to

255

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents

analyze the Chemfix Technologies, Inc. solidification/stabili-
zation technology. The technology uses a proprietary mixture
of silicate and cSmentious reagents to solidify and stabilize
the wastes. The technology demonstration took place at a
former recycling facility in Clackamas, Oregon. The wastes
consisted primarily of lead, copper, and polychlorinated bi-
phenyls. The demonstration effort was directed at obtaining
information on the performance and cost of the technology
for assessing its use at this as well as other uncontrolled
hazardous waste sites. Documentation consists of the report
that describes the field activities and laboratory results, pro-
vides an interpretation of the data, and discusses the poten-
tial applicability of the technology.

Specifications; 485p.

Subject Index keywords; Waste treatment, Solidification,
Chemical stabilization, Land pollution control, CHEMFIX
process, Superfund.

1340 Technology Evaluation Report of Retech, Inc.,
Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 1

Order Number P892-216035CDH, price: PC A09/MF A02
Science Applications International Corp., San Diego, CA;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Jul 92

A demonstration of the Retech, Inc. Plasma Centrifugal Fur-
nace (PCF) was conducted under the Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program at the Department of
Energy's (DOE's) Component Development and Integration
Facility in Butte, Montana. The furnace uses heat generated
from a plasma arc to melt and vitrify solid feed material. The
feed soil was a mixture of Silver Bow Creek soil and 10% by
weight No. 2 diesel oil, spiked to provide 28,000 ppm zinc
oxide and 1000 ppm hexachlorobenzene in the soil/oil mix-
ture. Pre-treatment soil and scrubber liquor/makeup sampling
was performed to characterize the material inputs to the
process. Following treatment, the vitrified soil, scrubber
liquor, and stack gas were sampled to determine the technol-
ogy's suitability for use in destroying and immobilizing con-
taminants in the test soil. The results from the test were
used to draw conclusions on the technology. The conclu-
sions derived from the test results are presented.
Specifications: See also PB92-216043 and DE91015815.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 190p.

Subject index keywords: Plasma furnaces, Incinerators,
Waste disposal, Hazardous materials.

1341 Technology Evaluation Report of Retech, Inc.,
Plasma Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 2

Order Number PB92-216043CDH, price: PC A15/MF A03
Science Applications International Corp., San Diego, CA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Jul 92

below the RCRA limit; (4) a high percentage of the metals
fed to the furnace are encapsulated in the treated soil; (5)
the PCF is advantageous over other incinerator technologies
in that it can successfully immobilize heavy metals in the
slag; however, this treatment option can be more expensive
than conventional incineration. The report is the second
volume of the two-volume series. This volume contains the
appendixes for the demonstration of the plasma centrifugal
furnace.

Specifications: See also PB92-216035. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 331 p.

Subject Index keywords: Plasma furnaces, Incinerators,
Waste disposals, Hazardous materials.

1342 Technology Evaluation Report of Retech's Plasma
Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 1

Order Number PB93-115160CDH, price: PC A09/MF A02
Science Applications International Corp., San Diego, CA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Apr 92

A demonstration of the Retech, Inc. Plasma Centrifugal Fur-
nace (PCF) was conducted under the Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program at the Department of
Energy's (DOE's) Component Development and Integration
Facility in Butte, Montana. The furnace uses heat generated
from a plasma arc to melt and vitrify solid feed material. The
feed soil was a mixture of Silver Bow Creek soil and 10 per-
cent by weight No. 2 diesel oil, spiked to provide 28,000 ppm
zinc oxide and 1000 ppm hexachlorobenzene in the soil/oil
mixture. Pre-treatment soil and scrubber liquor/makeup sam-
pling was performed to characterize the material inputs to
the process. Following treatment, the vitrified soil, scrubber
liquor, and stack gas were sampled to determine the technol-
ogy's suitability for use in destroying and immobilizing con-
taminants in the test soil. The results from the test were
used to draw conclusions on the technology.

Specifications: See also Volume 2, PB93-115178, Spon-
sored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH,
Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 190p.

Subject index keywords: Heat treatment, Waste treatment,
Soil treatment, Superfund, Innovative treatment technologies,
Plasma centrifugal furnaces.

1343 Technology Evaluation Report of Retech's Plasma
Centrifugal Furnace. Volume 2

Order Number PB93-115178CDH, price: PC A15/MF A03
Science Applications International Corp., San Diego, CA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Apr 92

The volume contains the appendices for volume 1. The
report contains TCLP data; particulates data; stack gas data;
feed soil data; treated soil data; pretest scrubber liquor data;
posttest scrubber liquor data; scrubber make-up data; contin-
uous emission monitors data; physical results data; gas sam-
pling logs; audit reports; and equipment operations data.
Specifications: See also Volume 1, PB93-115160. Spon-
sored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 348p.

Subject Index keywords: Heat treatment, Waste treatment,
Soil treatment, Superfund, Innovative treatment technologies,
Plasma centrifugal furnaces.

256

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents

1344 Technology Evaluation Report: Ogden Circulating
Bed Combustor at the McColl Super-fund Site

Order Number P392-227289CDH, price; PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Jan 92
The Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Pro-
gram was authorized in the 1986 Superfund amendments.
The report provides documentation of a pilot-scale treatability
study and demonstration of an innovative technology that
took place in San Diego, California at the Ogden Environ-
mental Services (OES) Research facility. Observation and
sampling of a research-scale circulating bed combustor
(CBC) took place during a preliminary test sponsored under
an agreement between the SITE Program and OES. The
treatability study was conducted on a minimal amount of rep-
resentative McColl Site waste to determine if a full SITE
Demonstration is feasible.

Specifications: 69p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment, Superfund, Circulating bed combustor.

1345 Technology Evaluation Report: Perox-Pure (Trade
Name) Chemical Oxidation Technology

Order Number PB93-213528CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Chicago, IL.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Aug 93
The report evaluates the perox-pure chemical oxidation tech-
nology's ability to remove volatile organic compounds (VOC)
and other organic contaminants present in liquid wastes. The
report also presents economic data from the Superfund Inno-
vative Technology Evaluation (SITE) demonstration and three
cases studies. The perox-pure chemical oxidation technology
was developed by Peroxidation Systems Inc. (PS!), to de-
stroy dissolved organic contaminants in water. The technolo-
gy uses ultraviolet (UV) radiation and hydrogen peroxide to
oxidize organic compounds present in water at parts per mil-
lion levels or less. This treatment technology produces no air
emissions and generates no sludge or spent media that re-
quire farther processing, handling, or disposal. The perox-
pure chemical oxidation technology was demonstrated under
the SITE Program at Lawrence Livermore National Laborato-
ry Site 300 in Tracy, CA. Over a 3-week period in September
1992, about 40,000 gallons of VOC contaminated ground
water was treated in the perox-pure system. For the SITE
demonstration, the perox-pure system achieved trichloroeth-
ene (TCE) and tetrachloroethene (PCE) removal efficiencies
of about 99.7 & 97.1 percent, respectively.

Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati. OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
113p.

Subject index keywords: Waste treatment, Water pollution
control, Volatile organic compounds, Oxidation, Perox-pure
chemical oxidation technology.

1346 Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Program. CF
Systems Organics Extraction System, New Bedford,
Massachusetts. Volume 1

Order Number PB90-186495CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., McLean, VA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Jan 90

The report summarizes the results of a Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation (SITE) demonstration of the CF Sys-

tems critical fluid organics extraction system at the New Bed-
ford Harbor, Massachusetts Superfund site. The technology
depends on the ability of organic pollutants to solubilize in
the process solvent, a liquefied gas. The pollutants treated
include polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polynuclear ar-
omatic hydrocarbons. The report examines the performance
of the process in terms of PCB extraction efficiency, variation
in process operating conditions, potential health and safety
impacts, equipment and handling problems, and projected
system economics. Volume I covers process design, field ac-
tivities, sampling and analytical program, and results and dis-
cussion.

Specifications: See also Volume 2, PB90-186503. Spon-
sored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 106p.

Subject index keywords: Solvent extraction, Waste dispos-
al, Sediments, Water pollution control, Hazardous materials,
Aromatic polycyclic hydrocarbons, Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation, Technology utilization, Marine dis-
posal, Cleanup operations, Polychlorinated biphenyls,

1347 Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Program. CF
Systems Organics Extraction System, New Bedford,
Massachusetts. Volume 2

Order Number PB90-186503CDH, price: PC A08/MF A01
Science Applications international Corp., McLean, VA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Jan 90

The report summarizes the results of a Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation (SITE) demonstration of the CF Sys-
tems critical fluid organics extraction system at the New Bed-
ford Harbor, Massachusetts Superfund site. The technology
depends on the ability of organic pollutants to solubilize in
the process solvent, a liquefied gas. The pollutants treated
include polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polynuclear ar-
omatic hydrocarbons. The report examines the performance
of the process in terms of PCB extraction efficiency, variation
in process operating conditions, potential health and safety
impacts, equipment and handling problems, and projected
system economics. Volume II contains sampling and analyti-
cal reports and operating log data.

Specifications: See also Volume 1, PB90-186495. Spon-
sored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 173p.

Subject index keywords: Solvent extraction, Waste dispos-
al, Sediments, Water pollution control, Hazardous materials,
Aromatic polycyclic hydrocarbons, Chemical analysis, Pollu-
tion monitoring, Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation,
Technology Utilization, Marine disposal, Polychlorinated bi-
phenyls.

1348 Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Program
Demonstration. EPA RREL's Mobile Volume Reduction
Unit

Order Number PB94-136264CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Dec 93

The document provides a detailed description of the U.S. En-
vironmental Protection Agency (EPA) Risk Reduction Labora-
tory's (RREL's) Volume Reduction Unit (VRU) process and
system. Detailed results from a demonstration of the VRU
was conducted in the fall of 1992 using RREL's pilot-scale

257

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION;
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents

unit at the Escambia Treating Company Superfund Site in
Pensacola, Florida. The technological effectiveness and the
economics of the process are assessed on the basis of ex-
tensive analytical and quality assurance programs. Quality
assurance of the sampling and analysis effort is an integral
part of this document. Operational data and sampling and
analysis information were carefully compiled to establish a
database against which other available data, as well as the
developer's claims, could be compared and evaluated.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
130p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Soil pollution, Wood preservatives, PCP(Pentachlorophenol).

1349 Technology Evaluation Report: Site Program
Demonstration of a Trial Excavation at the McColl
Superfund Site

Order Number PB92-226448CDH, price: PC A10/MF A03
IT Corp., Cincinnati, OH.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 92
A trial excavation of approximately 137 cubic yards of waste
was performed at the McColl Superfund Site in Fullerton, CA,
to better determine the nature of the waste, any treatment
needed to improve its handling characteristics, and the
extent of air emissions that might occur during excavation.
The type of information is necessary to plan full-scale reme-
diation of the highly acidic petroleum refinery waste buried at
the site. The trial excavation was conducted within a tempo-
rary enclosure with air exhausted from the enclosure through
a sodium hydroxide-based wet scrubber and activated-
carbon bed adsorber to reduce air emissions of sulfur dioxide
and organic compounds. Foam was used in an attempt to
suppress atmospheric releases from the raw waste during
excavation, storage, and processing. The air exhaust was
monitored for total hydrocarbons and sulfur dioxide before
and after the air emission control system. In addition, total
hydrocarbons and sulfur dioxide were monitored along the
site perimeter to determine potential impact of air emissions
on the nearby community.

Specifications: See also PB92-105857. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 212p.

Subject index keywords: Soils, Incinerators, Waste treat-
ment, Hazardous materials, Superfund, FulIerton(Califomia).

1350 Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Program
Demonstration of the DuPont/Oberlin Microfiltration
Technology

Order Number PB92-153410CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Chicago, IL.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Mar 92
In April and May 1990, the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), under the Superfund Innovative Technology
Evaluation (SITE) program, demonstrated Dupont/Oberlin's
microfiltration system at the Pamerton Zinc Superfund (PZS)
site in Palmerton, Pennsylvania. The microfiltration system
combines Dupont's Tyvek T-980 filter media with Oberlin's
automatic pressure filter and is designed to remove solids
larger than 0.1 micron in diameter from liquid wastes. The
microfiltration system demonstrated at the PZS site was
evaluated primarily in terms of its ability to remove metals
(mainly zinc) and particulates from the, contaminated ground-

water on site, while producing a dry filter cake and filtrate
that meet applicable disposal requirements.

Specifications: See also PB92-119023. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 109p.

Subject index keywords: Water pollution control, Land pol-
lution control, Hazardous materials, Superfund, Remedial
action, Liquid wastes, Microfiltration, DuPont/Oberlin Microfil-
tration Treatment.

1351 Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Program
Demonstration of the Ultrox International Ultraviolet
Radiation/Oxidation Technology

Order Number PB90-198177CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Chicago, IL.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Jan 90
The document presents the field evaluation results of the ul-
traviolet radiation (UV)/oxldation technology developed by
Ultrox International, Santa Ana, California. The field evalua-
tion of the technology was performed at the Lorentz Barrel
and Drum (LB&D) site in San Jose, California, under the Su-
perfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) program
from February 27 through March 10, 1989. The UV/oxidation
technology uses UV radiation, ozone, and hydrogen peroxide
to oxidize organic contaminants present in water. At the
LB&D site, this technology was evaluated in treating ground
water contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs).
The Ultrox system achieved VOC removals greater than
90%. The majority of VOC's were removed through chemical
oxidation. However, for a few VOC's, such as 1,1,1 -trichtor-
oethane (1,1,1-TCA) and 1,1-dichloroethane (1,1-DCA) strip-
ping also contributed toward removal. The treated ground
water met the applicable discharge standards (NPDES) for
disposal into a local waterway at 95% confidence level.
There were no harmful air emissions from the Ultrox system
into the atmosphere.

Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
141p.

Subject index keywords: Waste, Hazardous materials,

. Water pollution control, Ground water, Ultraviolet radiation,
Oxidation, Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Pro-
gram, Ultrox treatment, Volatile organic compounds.

1352 Technology Evaluation Report: Site Program
Demonstration Test. Accutech Pneumatic Fracturing
Extraction and Hot Gas Injection, Phase 1, Volume 1

Order Number PB93-216596CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
Science Applications International Corp., Hackensack, NJ.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
. Reduction Engineering Lab; Jul 93

The Pneumatic Fracturing Extraction (PFE) process devel-
oped by Accutech Remedial Systems, Inc. makes it possible
to use vapor extraction to remove volatile organics at in-
creased rates from a broader range of vadose zones. The
low permeability of silts, clays, shales, etc, would otherwise
make such formations unsuitable for cost-effective vapor ex-
traction and require more costly approaches. Pneumatic frac-
turing provides an innovative means of increasing the perme-
ability of a formation and thus extending the radius of influ-
ence so that contaminants can be effectively extracted. In
the PFE process, fracture wells are drilled in the contaminat-

258

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:

Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents

ed vadose zone and left open bore (uncased) for most of
their depth. A packer system is used to isolate small (2 ft)
intervals so that short bursts (- 20 sec) of compressed air
(less than 500 psig) can be injected into the interval to frac-
ture the formation. The process is repeated for each interval.
The fracturing extends and enlarges existing fissures and/or
introduces new fractures, primarily in the horizontal direction.
When fracturing has been completed, the formations then
subjected to vapor extraction.

Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH, Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
165p.

Subject index keywords: Land pollution control, Remedial
action, Soil treatment, Volatile organic compounds, Soil
vapor extraction, Pneumatic fracturing extraction.

1353 Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Program
Demonstration Test Horsehead Resource Development
Company, Inc., Flame Reactor Technology, Monaca,
Pennsylvania

Order Number PB92-205855CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Houston, TX.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Jul 92
A SITE demonstration of the Horsehead Resource Develop-
ment (HRD) Company, Inc. Flame Reactor Technology was
conducted in March 1991 at the HRD facility in Monaca,
Pennsylvania. For the demonstration, secondary lead smelter
soda slag was treated to produce a potentially recyclable
lead* and zinc-enriched oxide product and a nonhazardous
(based on the regulatory requirements of the Toxicity Char-
acteristic test) effluent slag. The lead and zinc in the oxide
product were concentrated about threefold from the feed
concentrations. The effluent slag was determined to be non-
hazardous based on extraction by the Toxicity Characteristic
Leaching Procedure. Potential wastes that might be treated
include industrial residues, Resource Conservation and Re-
covery Act wastes, Superfund wastes, and other wastes con-
taminated with metals and organic wastes.

Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab,
128p.

Subject index keywords; Hight temperature tests, Industrial
waste treatment, SITE program, Superfund.

1354 Technology Transfer Needs Assessment, 1990

Order Number PB91-125674CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
ICF, Inc., Fairfax, VA.; Environmental Management Support,
Silver Spring, MD.*Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, DC. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response: Apr 90

The report summarizes the results of the Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER) Technology
Transfer Needs Assessment of FY 1990. The effort extends
and updates a 1986 needs assessment conducted for the
Superfund program and previous ORD studies on Regional
research and technology transfer needs. It encompasses the
Superfund (CERCLA), Hazardous Waste (RCRA), and Under-
ground Storage Tank (UST) programs, including OSWER en-
forcement. Regional Environmental Service Divisions (ESDs)
and Superfund Technical Support Project Forum members
were also included in the survey. The study attempts to ex-
plore actual and future needs, to the extent possible and fur-
ther provides guidance for selecting technology transfer de-

livery methods, including electronic and other advanced
media for information distribution, based on specific needs
and audience characteristics. The results indicate the priority
of technical needs across program areas and Regions, and
provide previously unavailable data regarding OSWER audi-
ences.

Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Environmental
Management Support, Silver Spring, MD. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response. 112p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Technology
transfer, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response,
Waste management.

1355 Terra Vac In situ Vacuum Extraction System:
Applications Analysis Report

Order Number PB90-119744CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc., Livingston, NJ.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Jul 89

The report analyzes the results from the SITE Program's 56-
day demonstration at the Valley Manufactured Product Com-
pany's site in Groveland, Massachusetts. Conclusions were
reached concerning the technology's suitability for use fn re-
mediations involving both similar and different materials at
other sites. Operational data and sampling and analysis infor-
mation were monitored carefully to establish a database
against which vendor's claims for the technology could be
evaluated. Additional data on the technology's performance
at other sites is also discussed. The conclusions from the re-
sults of the Groveland demonstration test and from other
available data are: the process can be used to remediate a
site contaminated with VOCs; the process can remove VOCs
from soils with permeabilities as low as 10 to the 8th power
cm/s; the process operates well in all weather conditions;
and the process implementation costs can be as low as
$20/ton, depending on various site-specific conditions.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
65p.

Subject index keywords: Site surveys, Hazardous materi-
als, Vacuum apparatus, Extraction, Water pollution control,
Volatile organic compounds, Superfund program, Remedial
action, Waste management.

1356 Terra Vac In situ Vacuum Extraction System:
Applications Analysis Report

Order Number PB90-128665CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc., Edison, NJ,;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Jul 89

The document is an evaluation of the Terra Vac in situ
vacuum extraction system and its applicability as a treatment
method for waste site cleanup. The report analyzes the re-
sults from the Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
(SITE) Program's 56-day demonstration at the Valley Manu-
factured Product Company's site in Groveland, Massachu-
setts and data from other applications. Conclusions were
reached concerning the technology's suitability for use in re-
mediations involving both similar and different materials at
other sites. Operational data and sampling and analysis infor-
mation were monitored carefully to establish a database
against which vendor's claims for the technology could be

259

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents

evaluated. The conclusions from the results of the Groveland
demonstration test and from other available data are: (1) the
process can be used to remediate a site contaminated with
VOCs; (2) the process can remove VOCs from soils with per-
meabilities as low as 10 to the minus eighth power cm/s; (3)
the process operates weli in all weather conditions; and (4)
the process implementation costs can be as low as $10/ton,
depending on various site-specific conditions.

Specifications: Color illustrations reproduced in black and
white. Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cin-
cinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 65p.

Subject index keywords; Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Site surveys, Clean-up operations, Superfund program,
Groveland(Massachusetts), Terra Vac in situ vacuum extrac-
tion systems.

1357 Thermal Desorption Treatment

Order Number PB91-228080CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 91
Thermal desorption is an ex situ means to physically sepa-
rate volatile and some semivolatile contaminants from soil,
sediments, sludges, and filter cakes. For wastes containing
up to 10% organics or less, thermal desorption can be used
alone for site remediation. St also may find applications in
conjunction with other technologies or be appropriate to spe-
cific operable units at a site. Site-specific treatability studies
may be necessary to document the applicability and perform-
ance of a thermal desorption system. Thermal desorption is
applicable to organic wastes and generally is not used for
treating metals and other inorganics. Depending on the spe-
cific thermal desorption vendor selected, the technology
heats contaminated media between 200-1000 F, driving off
water and volatile contaminants. Offgases may be burned In
an afterburner, condensed to reduce the volume to be dis-
posed, or captured by carbon adsorption beds. The bulletin
provides information on the technology applicability, limita-
tions, the types of residuals produced, the latest perform-
ance data, site requirements, the status of the technology,
and sources for further information.

Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response. 10p.

Subject Index keywords: Waste treatment, Hazardous ma-
terials, Thermal environments, Desorption.

1318 Toxicological Assessment of Hazardous Wastes

Order Number AD-P006 488/3CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Seattle, WA. Office of
Research and Development; Mar 92
Section 121 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (SUPERFUND) calls
for hazardous waste site remediations which permanently
and significantly reduce the volume, toxicity, or mobility of
hazardous substances, pollutants, and contaminants. Tradi-
tional engineering technology has concentrated on reduction
in volume and mobility as assessed by chemical and geo-
physical measures. It was assumed that accomplishment of
volume and mobility reduction would lead to reductions in
toxicity. Environmental scientists long have argued that this
assumption might not be the case. However, lack of consen-
sus on how complex hazardous waste mixtures should be
measured toxicologicalty hampered integrated assessments.

Therefore, a battery of aquatic and terrestrial bioassays was
assembled and evaluated comparatively against several
chemicals and waste site chemical mixtures. The bioassays
were then applied to a mobility reduction demonstration to
assess its overall chemical, physical, and biological perform-
ance. Results indicated that, while the primary objective of
mobility reduction seemed to be achieved, undesirable sec-
ondary effects (toxicity) were introduced. These trade-offs
must be considered in the holistic sense when remediation
measures are being implemented.

Specifications: This article is from 'Managmcnt of Bottom
Sediments Containing Toxic Substances: Proceedings of the
US/Japan Experts Meeting (14th) Held in Yokohama, Japan
on 27 February-1 March 1990,' AD-A250 148, p260-271.
12p.

Subject index keywords: Toxicity, Waste management, Su-
perfund.

1359 Toxicological Implementations of Remediating
Hazardous Wastes

Order Number PB92-124171CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Corvallis Environmental Research Lab., OR; 1991
Section 121 of the amendments (1986) to the Comprehen-
sive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act of 1980 (SUPERFUND) calls for hazardous waste site re-
mediations that will permanently and significantly reduce the
volume, toxicity, or mobility of hazardous substances, pollut-
ants, and contaminants. Traditional engineering technology
has concentrated on reduction in volume and mobility as as-
sessed by chemical and geophysical measures, assuming
that reduction in volume and mobility would lead to reduc-
tions in toxicity. Environmental scientists long have argued
that this might not be the case. However, lack of consensus
on how complex hazardous waste mixtures should be meas-
ured toxicologicaliy has hampered integrated assessments.
Therefore, new work was initiated to assemble a battery of
aquatic and terrestrial bioassays to be evaluated compara-
tively against several individual chemicals, mixtures of chemi-
cals, and actual waste site chemical mixtures. The bioassays
were then applied to a mobility reduction demonstration to
help assess its overall chemical, physical, and biological per-
formance. Results indicated that although remediation ac-
complished the primary objective of mobility reduction, it in-
troduced undesirable secondary effects (toxicity). These
trade-offs must be considered in the holistic sense with
regard to the implementation and evaluation of remediation
measures.

Specifications: Pub. in Proceedings, International Confer-
ence of the Protection of the Environment, Lublin, Poland,
September 16-19, 1991 and International Conference on
Bioindication of Reg. Deterioration (6th), Ceske Budejovic,
Czechoslovakia, September 15-21, 1991. See also PB88-
125430. 20p.

Subject index keywords: Toxicology, Remedial action, Haz-
ardous materials, Bioassay, Toxic substances.

1360 Toxicological Profile for Benzo(b)Fluoranthene

Order Number PB90-247651CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
ICF-Clement, Washington, DC.; Agency for Toxic Substances
and Disease Registry, Atlanta, GA.'Envronmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC; Mar 90

The Toxicological Profile for Benzo(b)fluoranthene is intend-
ed to characterize the toxicological and health effects infor-

260

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION:
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents

mation for the substance. It identifies arid reviews the key lit-
erature that describes the substance's toxicological proper-
ties, Other literature is presented but described in less detail.
The profile begins with a public health statement, which de-
scribes in nontechnical language the substance's relevant
toxicological properties. Following the statement is material
that presents levels of significant human exposure and,
where known, significant health effects.

Specifications: Sponsored by Agency for Toxic Substances
and Disease Registry, Atlanta, GA., and Environmental Pro-
tection Agency, Washington, DC. 76p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Toxicity,
Public health, Superfund, Benzofluoranthene.

1361 Toxicological Profile for Trichloroethylene

Order Number PB90-127523CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta,
GA.; Syracuse Research Corp., NY."Oak Ridge National
Lab., TN,"Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
DC; Oct 89

The ATSDR Toxicological Profile for Trichloroethylene is in-
tended to characterize succinctly the toxicological and health
effects information for the substance. It identifies and re-
views the key literature that describes the substances's toxi-
cological properties. Other literature is presented but de-
scribed in less detail. The profile is not intended to be an ex-
haustive document; however, more comprehensive sources
of specialty information are referenced. The profile begins
with a public health statement, which describes in nontechni-
cal language the substance's relevant toxicological proper-
ties. Following the statement is material that presents levels
of significant human exposure and, where known, significant
health effects. The adequacy of information to determine the
substance's health effects is described. Research gaps in
nontoxic and health effects information are described. Re-
search gaps that are of significance to the protection of
public health will be identified in a separate effort. The focus
of the document is on health and toxicological information.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Syracuse Re-
search Corp., NY., and Oak Ridge National Lab,, TN. Spon-
sored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
146p.

Subject index keywords: Toxicology, Trichloroethylene.

1362 Tracking Toxic Substances at Industrial Facilities:
Engineering Mass Balance versus Materials Accounting

Order Number PB92-223213CDH, price: PC A09/MF A02
National Research Council, Washington, DC.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC; 1990
In response to a congressional mandate, this book examines
whether knowing the amounts of toxic substances entering
and leaving manufacturing facilities is useful in evaluating
chemical releases to the environment, waste reduction
progress, and chemical management practices. Tracking
these substances with rigorous engineering data is compared
with a less resource-intensive alternative to determine the
feasibility and potential usefulness to the public and the gov-
ernment.

Specifications: Library of Congress catalog card no. 89-
62948, Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, DC. 191 p.

Subject index keywords: Toxic substances, Environmental
surveys, Industrial wastes, Mass balance, Waste manage-
ment.

1363 U.S. EPA SITE Demonstration of A WD Technologies'
AquaDetox/SVE System

Order Number PB92-124387CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; c1991

The report covers the results of the Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation Program's demonstration of the AWD
Technologies AquaDetox/SVE. The system combines a
vacuum assisted steam stripping unit and a soil vapor gas
extraction system into an integrated unit. The demonstration
was conducted during September 1990 at the Lockheed
Aeronautical System Corp. in Burbank, CA, The results of a
2-week demonstration confirmed the ability of the system to
meet regulatory discharge requirements for the contaminants
of concern, TCE and PCE.

Specifications: Pub. in Jni. of Air Waste Management Asso-
ciation, v41 n11 pi 519-1523 Nov 91. 7p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Land pollution control,
Water pollution control, Remedial action, Waste manage-
ment, Volatile organic compounds, AquaDetox/SVE treat-
ment system.

1364 Ultrox International Ultraviolet Radiation/Oxidation
Technology: Applications Analysis Report

Order Number PB91-129759CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Chicago, IL.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 90

In support of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's
(EPA) Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE)
Program, the report evaluates both treatment efficiency and
economic cost from the SITE demonstration and seven case
studies. The Ultrox technology simultaneously uses ultravio-
let (UV) radiation, ozone, and hydrogen peroxide to oxidize
dissolved organic contaminants found in groundwater or
wastewater. Under the SITE Program, the Ultrox technology
demonstration was conducted at the Lorentz Barrel and
Drum (LB&D) site, San Jose, California, in February and
March of 1989. During the demonstration, the Ultrox system
achieved volatile organic compound (VOC) removals greater
than 90 percent. The majority of VOCs were removed
through chemical oxidation. However, stripping also contrib-
uted toward removal of a few VOCs, such as 1,1,1-trichlor-
oethane (1,1,1-TCA) and 1,1-dichloroethane (1,1-DCA). The
treated groundwater met the applicable National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards for dis-
charge into a local waterway. In addition, there were no
harmful air emissions to the atmosphere from the Ultrox
system, which is equipped with an off-gas treatment unit.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
79p.

Subject Index keywords: Water treatment, Waste water,
Ground water, Ultrox technology, Technology assessment,
Remedial action, Superfund.

261

-------
TECHNOLOGY POLICY & ADMINISTRATION;
Miscellaneous Policy & Program Documents

1365 Use of a Fourier Transform Spectrometer as a
Remote Sensor at Superfund Sites

Order Number PB91-199844CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Northrop Services, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC.; MDA
Scientific, Inc., Norcross, GA.**ManTech Environmental
Technology, Inc., Research Triangle Park,

NC.'Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle
Park, NC. Atmospheric Research and Exposure Assessment
Lab; 1991

A Fourier transform infrared remote sensor (FTIR-RS) was
used to measure chemical emissions at the Shaver's Farm
Superfund site in northwestern Georgia. The system was bis-
tatic with a source/receiver at one end of a 250 m path and
a retroreflector at the other end. The source/receiver was a
Nicolet Model 730 FTIR system coupled to a telescope with
the appropriate transfer optics. The average concentrations
of target gases along the path are inferred by matching field
spectra with reference spectra of precisely measured quanti-
ties of the target gases. Measurements indicated that ben-
zonitrile and benzaldehyde concentrations at the site were
lower than the FTIR-RS detection limits of 70 and 16 ppm-m,
respectively. Background IR radiation was successfully elimi-
nated by modulating the IR beam before it was transmitted
along the path. Quality assurance measurements to establish
the precision and accuracy of known gas burdens (ppm-m)
were carried out using a 15-cm cell containing high concen-
trations of several gases.

Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with MDA Scientif-
ic, Inc., Norcross, GA., and ManTech Environmental Technol-
ogy, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Atmospheric Research and Exposure Assessment Lab. 15p.
Subject index keywords; Air pollution detection, Remote
sensing, Superfund, Waste disposal, Fourier transform spec-
trometers.

1366 Use of Electrokinetics for Hazardous Waste Site
Remediation

Order Number PB91-171694CDH, price; PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab.; PEER Consultants, Inc., Dayton,
OH; c1990

The Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) pro-
gram was authorized as part of the 1986 amendments to the
Superfund legislation. It represents a joint effort between the
U.S. EPA's Office of Research and Development and Office
of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. The program is
designed to assist and encourage the development of waste
treatment technologies that would contribute to more solu-
tions to our hazardous waste problems. Recently, EPA,
through the SITE program, issued a work assignment to
assess the 'state-of-the-art' of electrokinetically enhanced
contaminant removal from soils. Prior research efforts, both
laborator and field, have demonstrated the electo-osmosis
has the potential to be effective in facilitating the removal of
certain types of hazardous wastes from soils. Particularly en-
couraging results have been achieved with inorganics in fine
grained soils where more traditional removal alternatives are
less effective. Although the results of various studies suggest
that electrokinetics is a promising technology, further testing
is needed at both the laboratory and field levels to fully de-
velop this technology for site remediation. A conceptual test
program is presented based on best available data which in-
corporates system design and operating parameters used in

previous applications of this technology in the use of electro-
kinetics treatment as a remediation technique at hazardous
waste sites. (Copyright (c) 1990-Air & Waste Management
Association.

Specifications: Pub, in Jnl. of Air Waste Management Asso-
ciation, v40 n12 pi 670-1676 Dec 90. Prepared in coopera-
tion with PEER Consultants, Inc., Dayton, OH. 9p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund. Hazardous materials,
Remedial action, Soil contamination, Electrodynamics.

1367 Use of 'Selenastrum caprlcornutum' to Assess the
Toxicity Potential of Surface and Ground Water
Contamination Caused by Chromium Waste

Order Number PB90-108242CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Corvallis Environmental Research Lab., OR.; Northrop
Services, Inc., Corvallis, OR; c1988
United Chrome Products, Inc. (Corvallis, OR), discharged
liquid chrome-plating wastes into an on-site dry well from
1957 to 1977. Samples were collected from ground and sur-
face waters during February and December 1984 and evalu-
ated for toxicity potential using 96-h Selenastrum capricornu-
tum bioassays. Bioassays of the February samples were
used to calculated predicted EC50 values for different chro-
mium concentrations, which were then compared with the
chromium concentrations measured in the December sam-
ples and with the results of S. caprlcornutum bioassays on
these samples. An excellent correlation was obtained be-
tween the predicted EC50 values and the actual bioassay re-
sponse values for ground water and drainage ditch samples.
However, no correlation was obtained with the off-site sur-
face water samples. These results could not be explained by
changes in chromium valence, and they demonstrate that,
even in simple systems, toxicity cannot readily be predicted
based solely on chemical analysis.

Specifications: Pub. in Environmental Toxicology and
Chemistry, v7 p35-39 1988. Prepared in cooperation with
Northrop Services, Inc., Corvallis, OR. 7p.

Subject index keywords: Chromium plating, Water pollution,
Toxicity, Industrial wastes, Selenastrum capricornutum.

1368 Using the DNA Alkaline Unwinding Assay to Detect
DNA Damage in Laboratory and Environmentally
Exposed Cells and Tissues

Order Number PB90-245770CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Narragansett, Rl.;
Environmental Research Lab., Narragansett, Rl; c1990
The DNA alkaline unwinding assay is being evaluated for use
in the detection of DNA damage in marine animals exposed
to environmental pollutants. In preliminary work, DNA un-
winding methods were used with in vitro cell systems to
demonstrate DNA strand breaks. Cultured mammalian fibrob-
lasts and sperm from marine fish and invertebrates (Pseudo-
pleuronectes, Arbacia and Mytilus) showed concentration-de-
pendent increases in DNA strand breaks after brief expo-
sures to alkylating agents. DNA unwinding methods were
also used on DNA extracted from marine animals injected
with genotoxicants and from animals exposed in situ at an
estuarine site. Gills from blue mussels caged at the New
Bedford Harbor Superfund Site (MA, USA) highly contaminat-
ed with many organic (e.g. PCBs) and inorganic contami-
nants, were also examined. A significant increase in DNA
strand breaks was seen in gill tissues of animals held in the
contaminated site for as little as 3 days. Although not as

262

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Air

Technologies

severe, an increase in strand breaks was also seen in ani-
mals held at the control site for 28 days. (Copyright (c) 1990,
Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd., England.)

Specifications: Pub. in Marine Environmental Research 28,
^333-337 1989. Sponsored by Environmental Research Lab.,
Narragansett, Rl. 6p.

Subject index keywords: Marine biology, DNA unwinding
proteins, Water pollution effects(Animals), DNA damage, Mu-
tagenicity tests.

1369 Vendor Information Form to be Completed for
Participation in the: Vendor Information System for
Innovative Treatment Technologies (VISITT)

Order Number PB91-921289CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jun 91
The Vendor Information System for Innovative Treatment
Technologies (VISITT) is an automated database developed
for use by those responsible for site remediation, including
state, federal, and private sector professionals responsible
for site cleanup of the nation's hazardous waste sites. The
Technology Innovation Office (TIO) and the Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER) is conducting
the Invitation for Submittals for developers and providers of
innovative treatment technologies. The information submitted
will be entered into the database. EPA expects that VISITT
will be used as a tool to screen technologies for remediation
of these sites.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste treat-
ment, Superfund.

1370 Vendor Information System for Innovative
Treatment Technologies (VISITT). Number 1

Order Number PB92-224716CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Jun 92
The bulletin highlights facts about the Vendor Information
System for Innovative Treatment Technologies (VISITT). This
database contains information on vendors of innovative tech-
nologies to treat ground water in situ, soils, sludges and sedi-
ments. It includes technologies at all stages of develop-
ment-bench, pilot, or full. VISITT provides environmental
professionals with rapid access to up-to-date information on
155 innovative technologies and the 97 companies that offer
them. Once the database identifies the technologies and
vendors meeting the user's requirements, the user can then
review such information as available equipment, performance
data, and experience.

Specifications: See also PB91-921289. 8p.

Subject index keywords: Ground water, Soils, Pollution

control, Remedial action, Information systems.

TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM
IMPLEMENTATION: Air Technologies

1371 Air Stripping of Aqueous Solutions. Engineering
Bulletin

Order Number PB92-180033CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 91
Air stripping is a means to transfer contaminants from aque-
ous solutions to air. Contaminants are not destroyed by air
stripping but are physically separated from the aqueous solu-
tions. Contaminant vapors are transferred into the air stream
and, if necessary, can be treated by incineration, adsorption,
or oxidation. Most frequently, contaminants are collected in
carbon adsorption systems and then treated or destroyed in
this concentrated form. The concentrated contaminants may
be recovered, incinerated for waste heat recovery, or de-
stroyed by other treatment technologies. Generally, air strip-
ping is used as one in a series of unit operations and can
reduce the overall cost for managing a particular site. Air
stripping is applicable to volatile and semivolatile organic
compounds. It is not applicable for treating metals and inor-
ganic compounds. The bulletin provides information on the
technology applicability, the technology limitations, a descrip-
tion of the technology, the types of residuals produced, site
requirements, the latest performance data, the status of the
technology, and sources of further information.
Specifications: See also PB88-1Q6166 and DE89015653.
9p.

Subject index keywords: Liquid wastes. Waste treatment,
Air pollution control, Water pollution control. Air stripping.

1372 Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Series.
Superfund Air Pathway Analyses Review Criteria
Checklists

Order Number PB90-182544CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, NC. Office of Air Quality Planning
and Standards; 17 Jan 90

The EPA has responsibility for assessment and cleanup of
superfund sites. Because air emissions pose a potential
human health risk at these sites, the EPA has developed a
set of procedures for evaluating these risks. The four check-
lists presented provide a systematic approach for air review-
ers to apply the air pathway assessment procedures. The
background, purpose, and application of the checklists are
discussed.

Specifications: See also PB90-113374, PB89-180053,
PB89-180061 and PB90-113382. Sponsored by Environmen-
tal Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Office of
Air Quality Planning and Standards. 63p.

Subject index keywords: Waste disposal, Hazardous mate-
rials, Risk assessment, Path of pollutants, Air pollution
effects(Humans), Superfund program, Air pollution sampling.

263

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION; Air
Technologies

1373 Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
Series. Air Emissions from Area Sources: Estimating Soil
and Soil-Gas Sample Number Requirements

Order Number PB93-173995CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Pacific Environmental Services, Inc., Herndon, VA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,
NC. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards; Mar 93
The document provides guidance regarding the necessary
number of soil gas or soil samples needed to estimate air
emissions from area sources. The Manual relies heavily on
statistical methods discussed in Appendix C of Volume li of
Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study Series
(EPA 1990) and Chapter 9 of SW-846 (EPA 1986). The tech-
niques in the manual are based on recognizing the inhom-
geniety of an area, by observation or screening samples,
before samples are taken. Each of the identified zones are
then sampled, using random sampling techniques, and statis-
tics calculated separately for each zone before combining
the statistics to provide an estimate for the entire area. The
statistical techniques presented may also be used to analyze
other types of data and provide measures such as mean,
variance, and standard deviation. The methods presented in
the Manual are based on small sample methods. Application
of the methods to data which are appropriately analyzed by
large sample methods or to data which is not normally dis-
tributed will give erroneous results.

Specifications: See also PB90-270588. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. 52p.

Subject Index keywords: Air pollution sampling, Soil gases,
Soil surveys, Sampling, Hazardous materials.

1374 Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
Series, Air Stripper Design Manual

Order Number PB91-125997CDH, price; PC AQ6/MF A01
Research Triangle Inst., Research Triangle Park, NC.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 90
A computer model package 'ASPAIR' was developed in the
project to describe the air stripping process along with proc-
esses for controlling the air emissions. The package is inte-
grated with a commercially available process simulator called
ASPEN to design and cost an air stripper and emission con-
trol system for specific applications. The applicability of the
ASPAIR model package was demonstrated through several
case studies which highlighted the effect of important param-
eters such as, Henry's Law constant, gas to liquid ratio, VOC
removal efficiency, and wastewater throughput. The results
of these case studies are presented in a graphical form to
allow quick 'short-cut' estimates of the performance and cost
of an air stripper and associated air emissions control units.
Two figures are provided in the manual that illustrate the
capital and annualized costs as a function of wastewater
flow rate and Henry's Law constant for a desired VOC re-
moval efficiency of 90%. Two additional figures are provided
that illustrate a similar cost correlation for a desired VOC re-
moval rate efficiency of 99%. The manual also provides cap-
ital and annualized costs graphs for catalytic oxidation and
carbon adsorption units used to control the emissions from
air strippers.

Specifications: See also PB90-207317. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response. 112p.

Subject index keywords: Manuals, Computerized simula-
tion, Strippers, Superfund, Remedial action, Water pollution
control equipment, Volatile organic compounds.

1375 Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
Series: Applicability of Open Path Monitors for
Superfund

Order Number PB93-138154CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, NC. Office of Air Quality Planning
and Standards; May 92

The document provides guidance on the applicability of
Open Path Monitors (OPMs) for ambient air monitoring at Su-
perfund sites. The relatively limited use of these devices for
ambient air monitoring has led to many questions concerning
their applicability, reliability, and sensitivity for these applica-
tions, Information is provided as to the general capabilities of
OPMs. The compounds that each method is capable of de-
tecting are tabulated. The detection limits of each type of in-
strument are discussed and compared to the detection limits
achievable using conventional techniques such as EPA
Method TO-14 as well as to short-term and long-term health-
based action levels. The data turnaround time and the ability
to resolve temporal variations in emissions are also dis-
cussed.

Specifications: See also PB89-180061, PB89-180053,
PB90-113382 and PB90-113374. Sponsored by Environmen-
tal Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Office of
Air Quality Planning and Standards. 136p,

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action, Path
of pollutants, Air pollution monitors, Hazardous materials,
Open Path Monitors.

1376 Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
Series. Comparisons of Air Stripper Simulations and
Field Performance Data

Order Number PB90-207317CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
PEI Associates, Inc., Cincinnati, OH,; Environmental
Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Office of Air
Quality Planning and Standards; Feb 90
One of the more common problems noted at Superfund sites
is the contamination of ground water by volatile organic com-
pounds (VOCs). One remedial alternative that is used to
reduce or remove the VOC contamination from water is air
stripping in a tower that uses either packing media or trays.
The ability to strip a compound from the water depends on
several factors, including the air/water ratio, the packing or
tray type, and the Henry's Law value for the compounds of
interest. The objective is to remove the VOCs from the
water. When being considered for remediation purposes, the
air stripper design should be evaluated for removal efficiency
and cost of operation. The purpose of the project was to col-
lect available design and operating data on operating air
strippers and to input the design and operating parameters
into the ASPEN simulator through a user interface program.
The results from the ASPEN simulator were compared to the
operating data gathered for the sites to determine the rela-
tive accuracy of the ASPEN model results when compared
with the actual performance data.

Specifications: See also PB90-182544, Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. 112p.

264

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Air

Technologies

Subject Index keywords: Ground water, Computerized sim-
ulation, Strippers, Superfund program, Remedial action, Vola-
tile organic compounds, Water pollution control equipment,

1377 Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
Series: Compilation of Information on Real-Time Air
Monitoring for Use at Superfund Sites

Order Number PB93-199222CDH, price; PC AQ5/MF A02
Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Dallas, TX. Region VI; May 93

The report summarizes the results of a U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA)-sponsored study to compile and
evaluate information on commercially-available real-time air
monitoring equipment for use at Superfund sites. In the docu-
ment, real-time (RT) and near real-time (NRT) monitors are
broadly defined as those instruments or methods that pro-
vide information either instantaneously or within a relatively
short time period {i.e., <30 minutes). The objectives of the
study were to review the available literature on real-time (RT)
air monitoring; compile a comprehensive list of real-time and
near real-time (NRT) air sampling techniques, equipment,
and vendors; contact vendors and users to collect informa-
tion on the technical specifications of their applicable instru-
ments; and prepare a guidance document that summarizes
the results of the study. The available literature was reviewed
to identify the most current methods for real-time or near
real-time measurement of ambient air concentrations of toxic
pollutants commonly found at Superfund sites.

Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Dallas, TX. Region VI. 99p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste disposal, Air pollution monitors, Real-time air moni-
tors.

1378 Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
Series. Contingency Plans at Superfund Sites Using Air
Monitoring

Order Number PB91-102129CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
PEI Associates, Inc., Cincinnati, OH.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency
and Remedial Response; Sep 90

Air emissions from remedial or removal activities at Super-
fund sites can potentially have a significant impact on the
health and safety of the individuals living and working around
the site. Contingency planning, as defined in the document,
encompasses the air program established to protect offsite
populations. Monitors for this purpose are usually located at
the site perimeter or within the community. The purpose of
the document is to: (1) illustrate contingency air monitoring
with examples from past projects, and (2) describe how a
contingency air monitoring program may be established. The
document Is illustrative in nature because the application of
this type of monitoring is not consistently prescribed in rules
and regulations, but is based on professional judgment ap-
plied in an analysis of individual sites and particular circum-
stances.

Specifications: See also PB90-207317. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response. 107p,

Subject index keywords: Guidelines, Superfund, Air pollu-
tion monitoring, Contingency planning.

1379 Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
Series. Database of Emission Rate Measurement
Projects

Order Number PB91-222059CDH, price; PC A06/MF A02
Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response; Jun 91

A compilation and evaluation of Volatile Organic Compound
(VOC) emission rate data was performed. The three primary
objectives were (1) to determine typical averages and ranges
of emissions for various types of sources; (2) to determine
the degree of correlation between emission rate results from
different sampling methods; and (30 to examine the effects
of different variables on measured emission rates. Emission
rate data are presented for 33 studies covering 13 types of
emission sources. The sources Include landfills, surface im-
poundments, waste water treatment systems, leaking under-
ground storage tanks, soil piles and landfarms. The emission
rate data were obtained by using the Emission Isolation Flux
Chamber, Downhole Emissions Isolation Flux Chamber, the
Concentration Profile method and the Transect method. For
each source, the total non-methane hydrocarbon and ben-
zene emission rates are reported along with three other com-
pounds that had the highest emission rate. Source concen-
tration data (e.g. concentration in soil or waste water) are
also reported for comparison to the measured emission
rates.

Specifications; Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response. 119p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Air pollution sampling,
Emission factors, Waste disposal, Sewage treatment, Land
pollution.

1380 Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
Series. Development of Example Procedures for
Evaluating the Air Impacts of Soil Excavation Associated
with Superfund Remedial Actions

Order Number PB90-255662CDH, price; PC A05/MF A01
PEI Associates, Inc., Cincinnati, OH.; Radian Corp., Austin,
TX.*Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle
Park, NC. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards; Jul
90

The purpose of the project was to identify and define the
computation requirements or estimating the air impacts from
the remediation of Superfund sites. Two example sites em-
ploying soil excavation were selected because they repre-
sent a complex emission source. The procedures for the
evaluation of the ambient impacts were divided into several
subtasks. These included site characterization, selection of
remedial alternatives, definition of remedial activities, estima-
tion of emission rates for each remedial activity, determina-
tion of ambient concentrations fromdispersion modeling, and
evaluation of carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic risks based
on dispersion modeling results. The calculation of emission
rates were used to estimate ambient impacts through disper-
sion models. The purpose was to outline a set of procedures
that could be used, with existing tools, to assist in the eval-
uation of air-pathway effects.

Specifications: Also pub. as Radian Corp., Austin, TX. rept.
no. DCN-90-203-080 61 -02. Prepared in cooperation with
Radian Corp., Austin, TX. Sponsored by Environmental Pro-

265

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Air
Technologies

tection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Office of Air
Quality Planning and Standards. 80p.

Subject index keywords: Soils, Excavation, Air pollution,
Remedial action, Volatile organic compounds, Emission
rates.

1381 Alr/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
Series. Emission Factors for Superfund Remediation
Technologies

Order Number PB91-190975CDH, price; PC A05/MF A01
Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response; Mar 91

The report contains procedures and example calculations for
estimating air emissions that occur from treating contaminat-
ed material at Superfund sites. Emission factors for six treat-
ment technologies are presented. These are: (1) Thermal
Treatment, (2) Air Stripping, (3) Soil Vapor Extraction, (4) So-
lidification and Stabilization, (5) Physical and Chemical Treat-
ment, and (6) Biotreatmect and Land Treatment. For each of
the six technologies, a literature review was conducted to de-
velop a flow diagram and identify emission points, as well as
to analyze available air emissions data. For most of the tech-
nologies examined, emission factors were based on available
data as well as assumed 'typical' operating conditions.
Where possible, however, emission factors were presented
on actual operating data from the site studies. Emission fac-
tors are presented for volatile organic compounds (VOC),
metals, particulate matter, S02, NOx, CO, HCI, and HF. The
report also contains an extensive bibliography related to
waste treatment technologies.

Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response. 91 p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Emission factors, Re-
medial action, Waste treatment, Air pollution, Superfund.

1382 Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
Series: Estimation of Air Impacts for Air Stripping of
Contaminated Water

Order Number PB91-211888CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response; May 91

Analysis of the air impacts associated with the alternatives to
cleaning up Superfund sites is frequently required for plan-
ning purposes prior to actual cleanup. Such analyses depend
on estimates rather than on field measurements. The report
provides procedures for estimating the emissions and ambi-
ent air concentrations associated with air stripping - a widely
used technique for removing volatile organic compounds
(VOC) from contaminated water. Procedures are given to
evaluate the effect of the concentration of contaminants in
water, the stripping efficiency and the stripping rate on the
emission rates and on the ambient air concentrations at se-
lected distances from the air stripper. Henry's Law constants
are provided for over 130 compounds to assist in determin-
ing stripping efficiencies. Health-based action levels are also
provided for the 130 compounds for comparison to the esti-
mated ambient air concentrations. Action levels are also ex-
pressed in terms of water concentrations using conservative
estimates of emissions and dispersion.

Specifications: See also PB91-190975. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response. 36p.

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Remedial action,
Water pollution control, Air pollution effects(Humans), Toxic
substances, Public health,

1383 Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
Series: Estimation of Air Impacts for Soil Vapor
Extraction (SVE) Systems

Order Number PB92-143676CDH, price: PC AQ3/MF A01
Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, NC. Office of Air Quality Planning
and Standards; Jan 92

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Air
Quality Planning and Standards and the Regional Air Offices
have been given the responsibility to evaluate air impacts
from Superfund sites. The report provides procedures for
roughly estimating the ambient air concentrations associated
with soli vapor extraction (SVE). The procedures for SVE
systems are analogous to procedures for air strippers that
have previously been published. SVE is also known as soil
venting, vacuum extraction, aeration, or in-situ volatilization. It
is a widely used technique for removing volatile organic com-
pound (VOC) vapors from contaminated soil. Procedures are
given to evaluate the effect of the concentration of the con-
taminants in the soil-gas and the extraction rate on the emis-
sion rates and on the ambient air concentrations at selected
distances from the SVE system.

Specifications: See also PB89-159396, PB91-168476, and
PB91-211888. Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards. 44p.

Subject index keywords: Air pollution abatement, Environ-
mental impacts, Hazardous materials, Superfund, Remedial
action, Soil vapor extraction, Volatile organic compounds.

1384 Air Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
Series. Estimation of Air Impacts for the Excavation of
Contaminated Soil

Order Number PB92-171925CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, NC. Office of Air Quality Planning
and Standards; 18 Mar 92

Analysis of the air impacts associated with cleaning up Su-
perfund sites is frequently required prior to actual cleanup.
Such analyses depend on estimates rather than on field
measurements. This report provides procedures for estimat-
ing the emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOC) and
the ambient air concentrations associated with the excava-
tion of contaminated soil. Excavation is an integral part of
any Superfund site remediation that involves removal or ex-
situ treatment such as incineration, thermal desorption, biore-
mediation, or solidification/stabilization. The report contains
procedures to evaluate the effect of the concentration of the
contaminants in the soil and the excavation rate on the emis-
sion rates and on the ambient air concentrations at selected
distances from the excavation site. Health-based ambient air
action levels are also provided for comparison to the estimat-
ed ambient concentrations.

Specifications: See also PB92-171917 and PB92-171909.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Research

^26€

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Air

Technologies

Triangle Park, NC. Office of Air Quality Planning and Stand-
ards, 59 p.

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Air pollution sampling,
Toxic substances, Waste management, Remedial action.

1385 Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
Series: Estimation of Air Impacts from Area Sources of
Particulate Matter Emissions at Superfund Sites

Order Number PB93-215648CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, NC. Office of Air Quality Planning
and Standards; Apr 93

The report provides procedures for estimating the ambient
air concentrations associated with emissions of particulate
matter from soils handling operations at Superfund sites. Ma-
terials handling operations are necessary at any site where
ex-situ treatment is performed. In addition, soils handling op-
erations, such as excavation or grading, are frequently per-
formed as part of site preparation. Procedures are given to
evaluate the effect of the handling rate and contaminant
concentration on the emission rates and on the ambient air
concentrations at selected distances from the treatment
area. Health-based ambient air action levels are also provid-
ed for comparison to the estimated ambient concentrations.
Specifications: See also PB93-215655. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. 44p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remediation, Ambient
air quality, Particulates.

1386 Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
Series: Evaluation of Short-Term Air Action Levels for
Superfund Sites

Order Number PB93-200913CDH, price: PC A14/MF A03
Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response; May 93

The report summarizes the results of an EPA-sponsored
study to compile and evaluate information on short-term air
action levels (AALs) used at Superfund sites. Because there
is no simple or widely accepted method for estimating the
risks of short-term exposures, there are no uniformly accept-
ed short-term air action levels for emissions from Superfund
sites. Air action levels have been established in a variety of
ways, depending on waste types at the site, state guidelines,
the potential for air emissions, cost, and individual project
manager discretion. State and local guidelines are often
based on occupational exposure limits (e.g., Threshold Limit
Values) that have been divided by a safety factor to account
for the differences in population and exposure of workers
and residents. Some states are adopting other approaches,
including the use of U.S. EPA-developed inhalation Refer-
ence Concentrations (RfCs).

Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response. 305p.

Subject index keywords: Air pollution monitoring, Super-
fund, Hazardous materials, Waste disposal, Air action levels,
Short term exposure.

1387 Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
Series. Guideline for Predictive Baseline Emissions
Estimation Procedures for Superfund Sites

Order Number PB92-171909CDH, price: PC AQ3/MF A01
Environmental Quality Management, Inc., Durham, NC.;
Environmental Protection Agency, New York. Region II; Jan
92

The purpose of the project was to develop a guideline for
using the preferred EPA-approved predictive models to esti-
mate air pathway exposure point concentrations for input to
Superfund site Baseline Risk Assessments. The document
provides the sequential series of steps necessary to accom-
plish the baseline air pathway analysis by predictive means.
Specifications: See also PB92-171917, PB92-171925 and
PB92-143676. Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, New York. Region II. 30p.

Subject index keywords: Air pollution sampling, Superfund,
Waste management, Remedial action, Toxic substances.

1388 Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
Series, Models for Estimating Air Emission Rates from
Superfund Remedial Actions

Order Number PB93-186807CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response; Mar 93

The report is a compendium of models (equations) for esti-
mating air emissions from Superfund sites undergoing reme-
diation. These models predict emission rates of volatile or-
ganic compounds (VOC's) and particulate matter (PM) from
both area and point sources. The following remedial process-
es are covered: air stripping, soil vapor extraction, thermal
desorption, thermal destruction (incineration), excavation,
dredging, solidification/stabilization, and bioremediation.
Emission estimation methods are also presented for landfills,
lagoons, and spills/leaks/open waste pits. The models con-
tained in the compendium will not accurately predict emis-
sions for all possible scenarios.

Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response. 163p.

Subject index keywords: Volatile organic compounds,
Emissions, Air pollution control, Mathematical models, Super-
fund.

1389 Air Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
Series. Screening Procedures for Estimating the Air
Impacts of Incineration at Superfund Sites

Order Number PB92-171917CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
International Technology Corp., Durham, NC.; Environmental
Protection Agency, New York. Region ii; Feb 92
The purpose of the project was to develop screening proce-
dures for estimating the air impacts of incineration at Super-
fund sites. The document outlines procedures for estimating
uncontrolled and controlled emission rates of hydrocarbons,
particulate matter, metals, acid gases and other contami-
nants as well as screening procedures for estimating ambient
air concentrations of these contaminants. The document also
provides screening evaluation procedures for compliance
with applicable or relevant and appropriate requirements
(ARARs) and for health effects.

267

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Air

Technologies

Specifications: See also PB92-171925 and PB92-171909.

Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, New York.
Region II. 70p.

Subject index keywords: Air pollution sampling, Superfund,
Toxic substances, Waste management, Remedial action.

1390 Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
Series. Volume 1. Application of Air Pathway Analyses
for Superfund Activities

Order Number PB90-113374CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
NUS Corp., Gaithersburg, MD.; Radian Corp., Sacramento,
CA." Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle
Park, NIC. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards; Jul
89

The report is one in a series of manuals dealing with air
pathway analysis at hazardous waste sites. The document
was developed for the Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards in cooperation with the Office of Emergency and
Remedial Response (Superfund). The document is an interim
final manual offering technical guidance for use by a diverse
audience including EPA Air and Superfund Regional and
Headquarters staff, State air and Superfund program staff,
Federal and Stat© remedial and removal contractors, and po-
tentially responsible parties in analyzing air pathways at haz-
ardous waste sites. The manual provides for flexibility in tai-
loring the air pathway analysis to the specific conditions of
each site.

Specifications: See also Volume 2, PB89-180053. Prepared
in cooperation with Radian Corp., Sacramento, CA. Spon-
sored by Environmental Protection Agency, Research Trian-
gle Park, NC. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
11 Bp.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Air pollution,
Waste disposal.

1391 Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
Series. Volume 1. Overview of Air Pathway Assessments
for Superfund Sites (Revised)

Order Number PB93-173987CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, NC. Office of Air Quality Planning
and Standards; Nov 92

The document introduces and provides an overview of air
pathway assessments for Superfund sites. The specific ob-
jectives of the document are to (1) introduce the basic ele-
ments of air pathway assessments (APA) for Superfund sites;
(2) identify and discuss the key issues related to APA work;
and (3) identify the best sources of published information
and guidance for each typical component of APA work. An
APA is a systematic evaluation of the potential or actual ef-
fects on air quality of an emission source such as a Super-
fund site. The APA may involve modeling or monitoring to
estimate these effects. The primary components of an APA
are: characterization of air emission sources; determination
of the effects of atmospheric processes such as transport
and dilution; and evaluation of the exposure potential at re-
ceptors of interest.

Specifications: Supersedes PB90-113374. Sponsored by
Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,
NC. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. 86p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Environmental expo-
sure pathway, Risk assessment, Air pollution monitoring.

1392 Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
Series. Volume 2. Estimation of Baseline Air Emissions
at Superfund Sites (Revised)

Order Number PB90-270588CDH, price: PC A17/MF A03
Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, NC. Office of Air Quality Planning
and Standards; Aug 90

The report presents available methods for estimating air
emissions at Superfund hazardous waste sites prior to any
remedial action. The report revises and expands an earlier
report, Procedures For Conducting Air Pathway Analyses For
Superfund Activities, Volume II. Estimation Of Baseline Air
Emissions At Superfund Sites, EPA-450/1-89-002. The pur-
pose of the report is to assist EPA Air and Superfund staff,
State Air Superfund program staff, Federal and State remedi-
al and removal contractors, potentially responsible parties
and others in designing, conducting, and reviewing air path-
way analyses at undisturbed hazardous waste sites.
Specifications: See also PB89-180053. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. 390p.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Air pollution.

1393 Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
Series. Volume 4. Guidance for Ambient Air Monitoring
at Superfund Sites (Revised)

Order Number PB93-199214CDH, price; PC A08/MF A02
Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, NC. Office of Air Quality Planning
and Standards; May 93

The report presents the results ot an EPA-sponsored study
to develop guidance lor designing and conducting ambient
air monitoring at Superfund sites. By law, all exposure path-
ways - including the air pathway - must be evaluated for
every Superfund site; therefore, some level of ambient air
monitoring usually is necessary at each site. The document
offers technical guidance for use by a diverse audience, in-
cluding EPA Air and Superfund Regional and Headquarters
staff, State Air and Superfund staff, federal and state remedi-
al and removal contractors, and potentially responsible par-
ties. The manual is written to serve the needs of individuals
with various levels of scientific training and experience in se-
lecting and using ambient air monitoring methods in support
of air pathway assessments.

Specifications: Supersedes PB90-113382. See also PB89-
180061. Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Re-
search Triangle Park, NC. Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards. 172p.

Subject index keywords: Air pollution monitoring, Hazard-
ous materials, Waste disposal. Superfund.

1394 Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance Study
Series. Volume 4. Procedures for Dispersion Modeling
and Air Monitoring for Superfund Air Pathway Analysis

Order Number PB90-113382CDH, price; PC A14/MF A01
NUS Corp., Gaithersburg, MO.; Radian Corp., Sacramento,
CA.*Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle
Park, NC. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards; Jul
89

268

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Air

Technologies

Remedial Response (Superfund). The document is an interim
final manual offering technical guidance for use by a diverse
audience including EPA Air and Superfund Regional and
Headquarters staff, State Air and Superfund program staff,
Federal and State remedial and removal contractors, and po-
tentially responsible parties in analyzing air pathways at haz-
ardous waste sites. The manual provides for flexibility in tai-
loring the air pathway analysis to the specific conditions of
each site, the relative risk posed by this and other pathways,
and the program resource constraints.

Specifications: See also Volume 1, PB90-113374. Prepared
in cooperation with Radian Corp,, Sacramento, CA. Spon-
sored by Environmental Protection Agency, Research Trian-
gle Park, NC. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
309p.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Air pollution.

1395 Assessing Potential Indoor Air Impacts for
Superfund Sites. Air/Superfund National Technical
Guidance Study Series

Order Number PB93-122257CDH, price: PC A09/MF A03
Pacific Environmental Services, Inc., Herndon, VA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,
NC, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards; Sep 92
The manual for assessing indoor air impacts was developed
to be used for buildings proximate to Superfund sites. The
procedures and methods may also be applied to other as-
sessments of hazardous wastes and hazardous materials.
The purpose is to provide information on methods and tech-
niques that can be used to assess the potential or actual
impact a Superfund site may have on the indoor air quality of
buildings proximate to the site in order that the risk to the
occupants from this source may be estimated. The manual is
designed to provide the tools needed to assist in the identifi-
cation and resolution of indoor air quality concerns at Super-
fund site.

Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards. 196p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Indoor air pollution, Air
pollution monitoring, Hazardous materials, Environmental
impact assessments.

1396 Canister-Based Method for Monitoring Toxic VOCs
In Ambient Air

Order Number PB92-206432CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,
NC, Atmospheric Research and Exposure Assessment Lab.;
ManTech Environmental Technology, inc., Research Triangle
Park, NC.**Battelle Memorial Inst., Columbus,
OH."Engineering Science, Gary, NC; c1991
The availability of reliable, accurate and precise monitoring
methods for toxic volatile organic compounds (VOCs) is a
primary need for state and local agencies addressing daily
monitoring requirements related to odor complaints, fugitive
emissions, and trend monitoring. The canister-based monitor-
ing method for VOCs is a viable and widely used approach
that is based on research and evaluation performed over the
past several years. The activity has involved the testing of
sample stability of VOCs in canisters and the design of time-
integrative samplers. The development of procedures for
analysis of samples in canisters, including the procedure for
VOC preconcentration from whole air, the treatment of water

vapor in the sample, and the selection of an appropriate ana-
lytical finish has been accomplished. The canister-based
method was initially summarized in the EPA Compendium of
Methods for the Determination of Toxic Organic Compounds
in Ambient Air as Method TO-14. Modifications and refine-
ments are being added to Method TO-14 in order to obtain a
Statement of Work for the Superfund Contract Laboratory
Program for Air. The paper discusses the developments
leading to the current status of the canister-based method
and provides a critique of the method using results obtained
in EPA monitoring networks. (Copyright (c) 1991 - Air and
Waste Management Association.)

Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of the Air and Waste Manage-
ment Association, v41 n1Q Oct 91. See also PB90-127374.
Prepared in cooperation with ManTech Environmental Tech-
nology, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC., Battelle Memorial
Inst., Columbus, OH., and Engineering Science, Cary, NC.
13p.

Subject index keywords: Volatile organic compounds, Air
pollution monitoring, Air samplers, Cans, Air pollution detec-
tion.

1397 Comparison of Organic Emissions from Hazardous
Waste Incinerators versus the 1990 Toxic Release
Inventory Air Releases

Order Number PB94-112836CDH, price: PC AG2/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; 1993

Incineration is often the preferred technology for disposing of
hazardous waste and remediating Superfund sites. The ef-
fective implementation of the technology is frequently imped-
ed by strong public opposition to hazardous waste inciner-
ation (HWI). One of the reasons cited for this opposition is
the perception that the emission of organics pose an unrea-
sonable threat to human health. In order to put organic emis-
sions in perspective, the mass of these emissions from the
incineration of hazardous waste on a national scale has been
estimated using 'reasonable worst-case' assumptions and
compared to the 1990 Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) air re-
leases. Comparisons were made for 15 carcinogenic organic
compounds and 17 non-carcinogenic organic compounds,
(Copyright (c) 1993 - Air and Waste Management Associa-
tion,)

Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of the Air and Waste Manage-
ment Association, v43 p1374-1379 Oct 93. 8p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Incinerators,
Organic compounds, Combustion products.

1398 Control of Air Emissions from Materials Handling
during Remediation. Engineering Bulletin

Order Number PB92-180041CDH, price; PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 91
The bulletin presents an overview discussion on the impor-
tance of and methods for controlling emissions into the air
from materials handling processes at Superfund or other
hazardous waste sites. It also describes several techniques
used for dust and vapor suppression that have been applied
at Superfund sites. The bulletin provides information on the
applicability of air emission controls for materials handling at
Superfund sites, limitations of the current systems, a descrip-
tion of the control methods that have found application to
date, site requirements, a summary of the performance expe-

269

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION; Air

Technologies

rience, the status of the existing techniques and identification
of future development expectations, and sources of addition-
al information.

Specifications: See also PB85-124881 and PB90-113374.
9 P-

Subject index keywords: Air pollution control, Materials
handling, Remedial action, Waste management. Hazardous
materials,

1399 Control of Air Emissions from Superfund Air
Strippers at Superfund Groundwater Sites

Order Number PB90-272667CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 15 Jun 89
The directive establishes guidance on control of air emis-
sions from air strippers used at Superfund sites for ground-
water treatment. The joint memorandum from Office Direc-
tors, OERR, and Air Quality Planning and Standards, estab-
lishes procedures for implementation.

Specifications; 8p.

Subject index keywords; Air pollution control equipment,
Hazardous materials, Strippers, Superfund, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, Waste management

1400 Control of Air Emissions from Superfund Sites

Order Number PB93-215614CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, OH. Center for Environmental Research
Information; Nov 92

The intended audience for the handbook are engineers and
scientists involved in preparing Remedial Design (RD) plans
for Superfund sites. The handbook contains a summary of
existing information and an overview of the topic of air emis-
sion controls is presented. The handbook contains back-
ground information to familiarize the user with the technical
basis for each control technology. Specific guidance is pro-
vided to assist the user in limiting the choices of potential
control technologies and in selecting a specific set of control
technologies for a given application. References are included
for users seeking more detailed guidance. The handbook is a
screening tool and is not intended to provide detailed techni-
cal specifications for preparing bid packages.

Specifications; See also PB86-151677. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Center for En-
vironmental Research Information. 163p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Air pollution control
equipment, Hazardous materials, Remediation.

1401 Control of Transient Incinerator Emissions with an
Oxygen Based Combustion System

Order Number PB91-1B2725CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Union Carbide Industrial Gases, Inc., Tarrytown, NY.; Foster
Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc., Edison, NJ.'Environmental
Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab; 1990

The subject of the paper is the experience with a novel and
field-proven method for the enhanced control of transient
emissions from rotary kiln incinerators using oxygen enrich-
ment. When high-BTU content wastes are fed into rotary kiln
incinerators in an intermittent mode (typical of ram feed sys-
tems), the transient combustion behavior of these materials
creates unsteady releases of combustible gases which may
momentarily deplete the oxygen content of kiln gases. These
temporary oxygen-deficient conditions could cause the re-

lease of products of incomplete combustion (PICs). Release
of PICs from incinerators has raised public concern and has
been the subject of research projects sponsored by the EPA.
The enhanced control of transient emissions was demon-
strated by the field operation of the EPA Mobile Incineration
System (MIS) at the Oenney Farm Superfund Site in
McDowell, Missouri. During the field operation of the MIS,
large quantities of high-BTU content wastes were burned pe-
riodically. These materials were ram-fed into the rotary kiln at
a frequency of about twice a minute. To respond to the tran-
sient oxygen demand resulting from the burning of these ma-
terials, a unique oxygen feedforward-feedback control logic
was designed into the LINDE Oxygen Combustion System
(OCS) which was retrofitted into the MIS in 1987. After imple-
mentation of the OCS, transient upset conditions were signifi-
cantly reduced during the operation of the MIS. Low NOx
emissions were also achieved.

Specifications; Presented at the Hazteeh International '90
held in Houston, TX. on May 8-10, 1990. Prepared in coop-
eration with Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc., Edison, NJ.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 25p.

Subject Index keywords: Air pollution control, Incineration,
Kilns, Combustion efficiency, Waste disposal, Oxygen com-
bustion system,

1402 Design Considerations for Ambient Air Monitoring
at Superfund Sites. Engineering Bulletin

Order Number PB94-102407CDH, price; PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 92
The Engineering Bulletin is intended to help the RPM design
the site-specific air monitoring program needed before, and
during site remediation. The types of AAM activities of inter-
est at Superfund sites are selecting the most appropriate ap-
proach, establishing the data quality objectives, and selecting
the proper sampling and analytical techniques. Key design
considerations, limitations, a procedure for designing the air
monitoring program, and other relevant technical information
regarding AAM at Superfund sites are presented. The bulletin
also provides a point of contact for further information.
Specifications; 9p.

Subject index keywords; Air pollution sampling, Superfund,
Documents.

1403 Engineered Biofliter for Removing Organic
Contaminants in Air

Order Number PB94-163532CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Aluminum Co. of America, Pittsburgh, PA.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab; cMar 94

Biofiltration is an established economic air pollution control
technology for removing organic contaminants in air. An en-
gineered biofilter using synthetic media, such as activated
carbon, has been developed that shows improvements in re-
moval efficiency, biodegradation and space requirements
over the existing filters. This carbon filter has been operated
for > 11 months in a bench-top unit, accomplishing > or =
90 percent removal efficiency consistently in a stream con-
taining 10 to 20 ppm of toluene. The mass transfer zone re-
mained stationary and extremely short (1 to 4 seconds of
empty bed contact time) during the entire operating period.
Compared with existing filters, this engineered filter showed

270

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Air

Technologies

40 to 80 times greater biodegradation efficiency under the
selected conditions, resulting in a decreased space require-
ment and other advantages in equipment sizing. (Copyright
(c) 1994 - Air & Water Management Association.)
Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of the Air and Waste Manage-
ment, v44 n3 p299-303, Mar 94. Sponsored by Environmen-
tal Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engi-
neering Lab. 7p.

Subject index keywords: Filtration, Scrubbers, Air pollution

control.

1404 Engineering Bulletin: Air Pathway Analysis

Order Number PB93-163046CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Nov 92

The bulletin presents information on estimating toxic air
emissions from Superfund sites. The focus is on the collec-
tion of air emissions data during the site inspection and re-
medial investigation/feasibility study and the use of these
data for the selection or implementation of treatment tech-
nologies. Emissions of volatile compounds and particulate
matter during site disturbances, such as excavation, may be
several orders of magnitude greater than the emissions level
of an undisturbed site. The potential air emissions from the
undisturbed and disturbed site must be considered before
developing a site mitigation strategy.

Specifications: See also PB89-180053, PB89-180061,
PB90-113374, PB90-113382 and PB92-180033. 10p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Toxic substances, Air
pollution, Waste disposal, Air Pathway Analysis.

1405 Engineering Bulletin: Technology Preselection Data
Requirements

Order Number PB93-105591CDH, price: PC AQ2/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 92
The bulletin provides a listing of soil, water, and contaminant
data elements needed to evaluate the potential applicability
of technologies for treating contaminated soils and water.
With this base set of data in hand, experts familiar with the
applicability of treatment technologies can better focus the
advice and assistance they give to those involved at Super-
fund sites. The data compiled should permit preselection of
applicable treatment methods and the direct elimination of
others. This bulletin emphasizes the site physical and chemi-
cal soil and water characteristics for which observations and
measurements should be compiled. Gathering and analyzing
the information called for in this bulletin prior to extensive
field investigations will facilitate streamlining and targeting of
the sampling and analytical objectives of the overall program.
Specifications: 9p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste treatment, Soil
treatment, Hazardous materials, Water pollution, Data re-
quirements.

1406 Estimating VOC Emissions from Superfund Sites in
the Houston-Galveston Texas Area. (NNEMS Project No.
1302)

Order Number PB92-196013CDH, price: PC A06
Environmental Protection Agency, Dallas, TX, Region VI; Aug
90

The purpose of the report focused on estimating the volatile
organic compound (VOC) emissions from Superfund sites in
the Houston-Galveston-Brazoria Consolidated Metropolitan

Statistical Area and the Buemont-Port Artur Metropolitan Sta-
tistical Area. Research of available data in the Environmental
Protection Agency Region VI files is expanded over a three
month time period. The intention of the project was to esti-
mate a tons per year VOC emissions rate. All the data and
information presented in the paper on VOC emissions from
Superfund sites was obtained from publicly available
sources.

Specifications: Portions of this document are not fully legi-
ble. 107p,

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Air pollution,
Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas, Texas, Superfund.

1407 Estimation of Air Impacts for Bloventing Systems
Used at Superfund Sites. Air/Superfund National
Technical Guidance Study Series

Order Number PB93-215655CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response; Apr 93

The report provides procedures for estimating the ambient
air concentrations associated with bioventing. Bioventing is
an insitu remediation process where oxygen is introduced to
the contaminated subsurfaces to enhance biodegradation
rates of the organic contaminants. Procedures are given to
evaluate the effect of exhaust gas flow rate and contaminant
concentration on the emission rates and on the ambient air
concentrations at selected distances from the area. Health-
based ambient air action levels are also provided for compar-
ison to the estimated ambient concentrations.

Specifications: See also PB93-215622. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response. 54p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remediation, Ambient
air quality, Bioventing.

1408 Estimation of Air Impacts for Solidification and
Stabilization Processes Used at Superfund Sites. Air/
Superfund National Technical Guidance Study Series

Order Number PB93-215622CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response; Apr 93

The report provides procedures for estimating the ambient
air concentrations associated with solidification/stabilization
of contaminated soil or sludge. Solidification/stabilization
processes are used to immobilize toxic and hazardous con-
stituents in the contaminated soil or sludge. Procedures are
given to evaluate the effect of the treatment rate and con-
taminant concentration on the emission rates and on the am-
bient air concentrations at selected distances from the treat-
ment area. Health-based ambient air action levels are also
provided for comparison to the estimated ambient concentra-
tions.

Specifications: See also PB93-215630, PB87-116745 and
PB93-186807. Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response. 54p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remediation, Ambient
air quality, Stabilization, Solidification.

271

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Air
Technologies

1409 Estimation of Air Impacts for Thermal Desorption
Units Used at Superfund Sites. Air/Superfund National
Technical Guidance Study Series

Order Number PB93-215630CDH, price; PC A04/MF A01
Radian Corp., Austin, TX.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response; Apr 93

The report provides procedures for estimating the ambient
air concentrations associated with thermal desorption. Ther-
mal desorption is a treatment process where heat is used to
physically remove organic compounds from soils and
sludges. Procedures are given to evaluate the effect of the
treatment rate and contaminant concentration on the emis-
sion rates and on the ambient air concentrations at selected
distances from the treatment area. Health-based ambient air
action levels are also provided for comparison to the estimat-
ed ambient concentrations.

Specifications: See also PB93-215648. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response, 54p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Remediation, Ambient
air quality, Thermal desorption.

1410 Evaluation of Emission Factors for Formaldehyde
from Certain Wood Processing Operations. Final Report,
May-August 1989

Order Number PB9G-254988CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Radian Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Air and
Energy Engineering Research Lab; Jun 90
The report gives results of a search for information on form-
aldehyde emissions from wood veneer operations, to devel-
op emission factors for the industry. Formaldehyde releases
of 246 kg were reported under Title III of the Superfund
Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986 from
a large plywood plant in Mississippi. However, existing data
found during the study period were insufficient to allow reli-
able emission factors to be calculated.

Specifications: See also PB88-118492. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC.
Air and Energy Engineering Research Lab. 33p.

Subject index keywords: Formaldehyde, Air pollution con-
trol, Emission factors, Wood products industry.

1411 Foam Scrubbing (Chapter 9)

Order Number PB93-236560CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc., Livingston, NJ.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; 15 Sep 93
Aqueous foam is a mixture of air (or other gas), surfactant
and water. Foam can be used in at least two ways for emis-
sion control: foam blanketing and foam scrubbing. Foam
scrubbing differs from blanketing in that the foam (usually
high-expansion) is blown using the contaminated air that is to
be treated. Thus, in foam scrubbing the contaminant is inside
the foam bubbles. While the release is contained in this
manner, a scrubbing process can take place. The foam solu-
tion can be formulated to include an appropriate reagent that
can 'neutralize' the absorbed gases, if necessary (for exam-
ple, an acidic additive to neutralize ammonia). Potential appli-
cations of foam scrubbing for emergency control are many:
the chemical industry (ammonia, hydrogen chloride, sulfuric
acid, etc.), municipalities (chlorine tanks at water treatment
facilities), and emergency responders (chemical spills, tank

truck accidents, etc.) Foam scrubbing could also be used at
Superfund sites during excavation to safeguard workers and
surrounding communities from releases of volatile toxic ma-
terials. The chapter summarizes the available information on
foam scrubbing, including results of an EPA research pro-
gram on the subject. Although largely still in the research
stage, the information available to date is encouraging.
Specifications: Pub. in Prevention and Control of Acciden-
tal Releases of Hazardous Gases, p232-252 Jun 93. See
also PB82-227117, Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
22p.

Subject index keywords: Air pollution control, Foam, Fugi-
tive emissions, Foam scrubbing.

1412 Instructional Package on Regulatory Air Quality
Modeling. Part 1: Videos on the 'Guideline on Air Quality
Models (Revised)' and the Model Clearinghouse (Video)

Order Number PB94-780012CDH, price: Call for price
Pacific Environmental Services, Inc., Research Triangle Park,
NC.; Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle
Park, NC. Technical Support Div; Jun 92
Video tape presentations describe the major regulatory air
modeling guidance document, the 'Guideline on Air Quality
Models (Revised),' and the Agency's focal point for reviewing
the use of dispersion modeling techniques, the Model Clear-
inghouse. The intended audience for these materials is those
professionals who have some technical experience using a
personal computer (PC) and whose responsibilities now in-
clude running EPA's air quality models (1) to assess the
impact of emissions from new or modified sources or air
toxics releases, or (2) to replicate the model results submit-
ted in conjunction with such regulatory programs as New
Source Review (NSR), Prevention of Significant Deterioration
(PSD), National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) at-
tainment demonstrations, Superfund (SARA), and others.
Specifications: This VHS video is 1/2 inch, color, stereo
sound, playing time of 60 minutes with instructions sheets in-
cluded in package. Part 2 (Diskette Version) is available as
PB94-500626. Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Technical Support Div.
1 VHS video.

Subject index keywords: Air pollution dispersion, Pollution
regulations, Models.

1413 Long-Path FTIR Measurements of Volatile Organic
Compounds in an Industrial Setting (July 1989-Aprll
1991)

Order Number PB92-206424CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
NS1 Technology Services Corp., Research Triangle Park,
NC.: MDA Scientific, Inc., Norcross, GA."Nicolet Instrument
Corp., Madison, Wi."Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, NC. Atmospheric Research and
Exposure Assessment Lab; c1991

As part of a Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
(SITE) field program, a Fourier transform infrared (FTIR)
spectrometer was used to make open path measurements of
volatile organic compounds in the New Castle, Delaware,
area. The SITE program requires that new technologies be
compared with more mature measurement techniques. In this
case, a canister-based sampling and analytical methodology
was chosen to compare with the FTIR measurements. Whole
air samples were collected in the canisters as they were re-

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Air

Technologies

peatedly transported along the open measurement path of
the FTIR spectrometer. FTIR spectra were co-added for 32-
min sampling intervals. Conclusions were: (1) that the FTIR
system as it is currently configured can be used as a reliable
monitoring instrument when the concentrations are greater
than about 50 ppbv; (2) that transporting the canisters along
the path is a viable technique for comparing long-path and
point-sampler measurements.

Specifications: Pub. in Jnt. of the Air and Waste Manage-
ment Association, v41 n8 p1062-1066 Aug 91. Prepared in
cooperation with MDA Scientific, Inc., Norcross, GA., and Ni-
colet Instrument Corp., Madison, Wl. Sponsored by Environ-
mental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. At-
mospheric Research and Exposure Assessment Lab. 7p.
Subject index keywords: Volatile organic compounds, infra-
red spectrometers, Hazardous materials, Superfund.

1414 Measurement of Volatile Organic Compounds during
Start-Up of Bioremediation of French Limited Superfund
ate in Crosby Texas Using Wind Dependent Whole-Air
Sampling

Order Number PB93-168821CDH, price: PC AC3/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,
NC. Atmospheric Research and Exposure Assessment Lab.;
ManTech Environmental Technology, Inc., Research Triangle
Park, NCXonTech, Inc., Van Nuys, CA; 1993
Whole-air sampling was performed before and after the start-
up of the bioremediation of an industrial (primarily petro-
chemical) waste lagoon in Crosby Texas, near Houston. Four
'Sector Samplers' were deployed at the four corners of the
French Limited Superfund Site. These samplers collect air
into one of two SUM MA polished canisters depending upon
wind direction and speed. When the wind blows at the sam-
pler from across the waste lagoon, air is routed to the 'IN'
sector canister, otherwise sample is collected in the 'OUT'
sector canister. As such, each sampler provides its own
background sample, and, upon gas chromatographic analy-
sis, individual compounds can be associated with the waste
lagoon. Five sets of 24-hour sector samples were taken; the
first set was collected prior to the start of the bioremediation
effort and the remaining four sets were taken sequentially for
four 24-hour periods after the start-up of the procedure.
Specifications: See also PB92-206432. Prepared in coop-
eration with ManTech Environmental Technology, Inc., Re-
search Triangle Park, NC. Sponsored by XonTech, Inc., Van
Nuys, CA. 13p.

Subject index keywords: Volatile organic compounds, Bio-
logical treatment, Remedial action, Superfund, Air pollution
sampling, Waste management.

1415 Options for Developing and Evaluating Mitigation
Strategies for Indoor Air Impacts at CERCLA Sites. Air/
Superfund National Technical Guidance Study Series,
Report ASF-36

Order Number PB94-110517CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,
NC. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards; Sep 93
The purpose of the document is to present and analyze ap-
proaches that may be used to mitigate the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of
1980 (CERCLA) site impacts on the indoor air quality of
nearby structures. The document is designed to provide in-
formation that may assist in resolution of indoor air quality
concerns at CERCLA sites. The procedures and methods,

however, may also be useful in developing mitigation strate-
gies for indoor air impacts from other hazardous wastes and
hazardous materials sources. The document focuses primari-
ly on mitigation methods that may be applied in the immedi-
ate vicinity of the impacted or potentially impacted
structure(s). Reference is made to CERCLA site remediation
methods that may also have a beneficial impact on indoor air
quality, but these are not discussed in detail. The document
includes summary level information on technical methods to
prevent or reduce the intrusion of site related chemicals into
the indoor environment and institutional methods to restrict
the use of developed and undeveloped property to the
extent necessary to reduce risks to acceptable levels.
Specifications: See also PB93-122257. 167p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Indoor air pollution,
Remedial action.

1416 Review and Evaluation of Area Source Dispersion
Algorithms for Emission Sources at Superfund Sites

Order Number PB90-142753CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,
NC. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.; TRC
Environmental Consultants, Inc., East Hartford, CT; Nov 89
The report examines air quality dispersion modeling algo-
rithms and related technical issues associated with estimat-
ing ambient concentrations from area sources at Superfund
sites. The report describes the area source emission charac-
teristics associated with Superfund sites and provides a
review of existing, available techniques for modeling area
sources. It also describes the results of applying five short-
term and three long-term area source models to a number of
example applications and one field data base in order to
compare the magnitude of concentration predictions and test
whether concentration estimates are consistent with mathe-
matical and physical principles. The report provides conclu-
sions and recommendations.

Specifications; Prepared in cooperation with TRC Environ-
mental Consultants. Inc., East Hartford, CT. 124p,

Subject index keywords: Atmospheric diffusion, Hazardous
materials, Mathematical models, Air quality, Superfund pro-
gram, Environmental transport, Air pollution sampling.

1417 Sector Sampling for VOC's during Remediation of
Superfund Site at Shaver's Farm, Georgia

Order Number PB91-182840CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
ManTech Environmental Technology, Inc., Research Triangle
Park, NC,; Environmental Protection Agency, Research
Triangle Park, NC. Atmospheric Research and Exposure
Assessment Lab; 1991

The sector sampling approach for the determination of the
spatial contributions of volatile organic compounds to the
ambient air was employed at a Superfund site under remedi-
ation. Two canister based sampling systems were deployed
and whole air samples were collected at the Shaver's Farm
Superfund Site in northwest Georgia near Chattanooga, Ten-
nessee, while chemical waste drums were excavated and re-
packaged. The method is based upon the collection of a
constant stream of air into one of two SUMMA polished can-
isters depending on wind direction; when the wind comes to-
wards the sampler from the suspected emissions area,
sample is routed into the 'IN' sector canister, otherwise,
sample is collected in the 'OUT' sector canister. Upon analy-
sis, the comparison between the IN and OUT sample results

273

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Bioremediation Technologies

indicates compounds that are emitted from the suspected
source area. Data from the week-long Shaver's Farm field
study are presented along, with a mathematical method for
interpretation.

Specifications; Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Atmospheric Research
and Exposure Assessment Lab. 18p.

Subject index keywords: Air pollution sampling, Superfund,
Waste disposal, Waste storage, Volatile organic compounds,
Remedial action.

TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

IMPLEMENTATION: Bioremediation
Technologies

1418 Alternative Biological Treatment Processes for
Remediation of Creosote-and PCP-Contaminated
Materials: Bench-Scale Treatability Studies

Order Number PB91-179085CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Southern BioProducts, Inc., Pendleton, SC.; Technical
Resources, Inc., Gulf Breeze, FL,*Environmental Research
Lab., Gulf Breeze, FL; Mar 91

Bench-scale biotreatability studies were performed to deter-
mine the most effective of two bioremediation application
strategies to ameliorate creosote- and pentachlorophenol
(PCP)-contaminated soils present at the American Creosote
Works Superfund site, Pensacola, Florida: solid-phase biore-
mediation or slurry-phase bioremediation. When Indigenous
microorganisms were employed as biocatalysts, solid-phase
bioremediation was slow and ineffective (8-12 weeks re-
quired to biodegrade >50% of resident organics). Biodegra-
dation was limited to lower-molecular-weight constituents
rather than the more hazardous, higher-molecular-weight
(HMW) compounds; PCP and HMW polycyclic aromatic hy-
drocarbons (PAHs) containing 4 or more fused rings resisted
biological attach. Moreover, supplementation with aqueous
solution of inorganic nutrients had little effect on the overall
effectiveness of the treatment strategy. Alternatively, slurry-
phase bioremediation was much more effective: >50% of
targeted organics were biodegraded in 14 days. Again, how-
ever, more persistent contaminants, such as PCP and HMW
PAHs, were not extensively degraded when subjected to the
action of indigenous microorganisms.

Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Technical Re-
sources, Inc., Gulf Breeze, FL. Sponsored by Environmental
Research Lab., Gulf Breeze, FL. 97p.

Subject index keywords: Biological treatment, Remedial
action, Creosote, Superfund, Waste disposal, Phenol/pen-
tachloro.

1419 Bench-Scale Evaluation of Alternative Biological
Treatment Processes for the Remediation of
Pentachlorophenol- and Creosote-Contaminated
Materials: Slurry-Phase Bioremediation

Order Number PB92-129683CDH, price; PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Research Lab., Gulf Breeze, FL; c1991
Performance data on slurry-phase bioremediation of pentach-
lorophenol (PCP)- and creosote-contaminated sediment and
surface soil were generated at the bench-scale level. Aque-
ous slurries, containing 0.05% Triton X-100 to facilitate the
soil washing process and to help stabilize the suspensions,

were prepared from sediment and surface soil freshly ob-
tained from the American Creosote Works Superfund site at
Pensacola, Florida. Excluding PCP, benzo(b)fluoranthene,
benzo(k)-fluoranthene and inde no (123-cd)pyrene, slurry-
phase bioremediation of highly contaminated sediment (pH
adjusted) resulted in rapid and extensive biodegradation (3-5
days to biodegrade > 50% of targeted compounds) of moni-
tored constituents. Data suggest that slurry-phase bioreme-
diation strategies can be effectively employed to remediate
creosote-contaminated materials.

Specifications: Pub. in Environmental Science and Tech-
nology, v25 n6 p1055-1061 1991. See also PB91-179085,
9p.

Subject index keywords: Biological treatment, Remedial
action, Waste disposal, Creosote, Superfund, Phenol/pen-
tachloro.

1420 Bench-Scale Evaluation of Alternative Biological
Treatment Processes for the Remediation of
Pentachlorophenol- and Creosote-Contaminated
Materials: Solid-Phase Bioremediation

Order Number PB92-129725CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Research Lab., Gulf Breeze, FL; c1991
Bench-scale biotreatability studies were performed to evalu-
ate potential for a solid-phase bioremediation process to
ameliorate pentachlorophenol (PCP)- and creosote-contami-
nated sediment and surface soil at the American Creosote
Works Superfund site, Pensacola, Florida. Surface soil and
sediment were contaminated with approximately 1 and 7%
(weight basis) organic pollutants, respectively, but the more
recalcitrant creosote constituents (i.e., high-molecular-weight
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) were proportionately
higher in the surface soil indicative of creosote weathering.
Data suggest that full-scale site remediation employing solid-
phase bioremediation strategies may not effectively meet ac-
ceptable treatment standards in the time defining these stud-
ies.

Specifications: Pub. in Environmental Science and Tech-
nology, v25 n6 p1045-1055 1991. See also PB89-109920
and PB88-174446, 13p.

Subject index keywords: Biological treatment, Remedial
action, Creosote, Waste management, Phenol/pentachloro,
Superfund.

1421 Bioremediation: An Information Update on Applying
Bioremediation to Site Cleanup

Order Number PB93-126175CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Mar 92
The Bioremediation Field Initiative was established to provide
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and State
Project Managers, consulting engineers, and industry with
timely information regarding new developments in the appli-
cation of bioremediation at hazardous waste sites. The initia-
tive provides evaluation of the performance of selected full-
scale field applications; provides technical assistance to Re-
medial Project Managers (RPMs) and On-Scene Coordina-
tors (OSCs), through the Technical Support Centers; and is
developing a data base on the field applications of bioreme-
diation, which is summarized in this bulletin.

Specifications: See also PB92-224708 and PB92-224807.
34p.

274

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:

Bioremediation Technologies

Subject Index keywords: Biological treatment. Remedial
action, Waste management, Hazardous materials, Cleanup
operations.

1422 Bioremediation in the Field, An Information Update
on Applying Bioremediation to Site Clean-Up. Number 3

Order Number PB92-224807CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Aug 91
The Bioremediation Field Initiative was established to provide
EPA and State Project Managers, consulting engineers and
industry with timely information regarding new developments
in the application of bioremediation at hazardous waste sites.
The initiative will fully evaluate the performance of selected
full-scale field applications, provide technical assistance to
RPMs and OSCs, and develop a treatability database to be
available through the Alternative Treatment Technologies In-
formation Center (ATTIC). Six sites have currently been se-
lected for field evaluation of bioremediation: Libby Superfund
Site, Libby, Montana; Park City Pipeline Spill, Park City,
Kansas; Allied Signal Superfund Site, St. Joseph, Michigan;
Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska; Hill Air Force Base, Utah;
and Brookhaven Superfund Site, Brookhaven, MS.
Specifications; 25p.

Subject Index keywords: Biological treatment, Remedial
action, Hazardous materials, Waste management, Cleanup
operations.

1423 Bioremediation in the Field: An Information Update
on Applying Bioremediation to Site Cleanup. (Number 4)

Order Number PB92-224708CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Dec 91
Contents: Update on the Bioremediation Field Initiative; Bior-
emediation Being Evaluated at the Brookhaven Wood Pre-
serving Facility; Bioremediation Action Committee: 1991 Ac-
complishments; Interim Guidelines Issued for Preparing Bior-
emediation Spill Response Plans; FTTA Offers Opportunities
for Cooperative Biosystems R&D with EPA; 1991 Bioreme-
diation Field Projects; RREL Provides Technical Support for
Bioremediation of Superfund Sites; Bioremediation Field Initi-
ative Contacts; EPA Bioremediation Publications; EPA
Athens Lab and GLNPO Demonstrate Anaerobic Degrada-
tion of PCBs; Cleanup Information Bulletin Board; Field Appli-
cations of Bioremediation; Bioremediation Live Satellite Sem-
inar.

Specifications: 29p.

Subject index keywords: Biological treatment, Remedial
action, Hazardous materials, Waste management, Bioreme-
diation, Cleanup.

1424 Bioremediation in the Field: Number 1, November
1990

Order Number PB93-206340CDH. price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Nov 90
The Bioremediation Field Initiative is designed to provide
EPA and State project managers, consulting engineers, and
industry with timely information regarding new developments
in the application of bioremediation. These applications in-
clude the cleanup of abandoned waste sites, industrial facili-
ties, leaking underground storage tanks and ground water
impacted from these sources. The Technology Innovation
Office (TIO), an office within the Office of Solid Waste and

Emergency Response (OSWER), in conjunction with the
Office of Research and Development's (ORD) Office of
Technology Transfer and Regulatory Support, will produce
the buliiten on a regular basis to serve as the principal infor-
mation transfer mechanism for the Bioremediation Field Initi-
ative.

Specifications: See also PB92-224708 and PB92-224807,
18p.

Subject index keywords: Biological treatment, Remedial
action, Hazardous materials. Waste management.

1425 Bioremediation Resource Guide and Bioremediation
Resource Matrix

Order Number PB94-112307CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
The Bioremediation Resource Guide is intended to support
decision-making by Regional and State Corrective Action
permit writers. Remedial Project Managers (RPMs), On-
Scene Coordinators, contractors, and other involved in evalu-
ating cleanup alternatives by directing readers to bioremedia-
tion resource documents, databases, hotlines, and dockets
as well as identifying regulatory mechanisms (e.g., Research
Development and Demonstration Permits) that have the po-
tential to ease the implementation of bioremediation at haz-
ardous waste sites. The Guide provides abstracts of repre-
sentative examples of over 80 bioremediation bibliographies,
guidance, workshop reports, overview documents, study/test
results, and test designs/protocols. The Bioremediation Re-
source Matrix, which accompanies the Guide, identifies the
technology, media, and contaminants covered in each ab-
stracted document. The included documents focus for the
most part on soil and ground water and on in-situ, slurry
phase, and land treatment bioremediation.

Specifications: 32p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste processing,
Bioremediation.

1426 Pilot-Scale Demonstration of a Slurry-Phase
Biological Reactor for Creosote-Contaminated Soil.
Applications Analysis Report

Order Number PB94-124039CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
IT Corp., Cincinnati, OH.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; Jan 93
IT Corporation in conjunction with ECOVA Corporation
(ECOVA) evaluated ECOVA's slurry-phase bioremediation
technology under U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's
(EPA) Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE)
program. The purpose of this report is to present information
from the SITE demonstration and from three case studies to
evaluate the technical and economic applicability of slurry-
phase bioremediation technology to the remediation of soil-
and sludge-bound hazardous contaminants.

Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
75p.

Subject index keywords: Soil treatment, Hazardous materi-
als, Superfund, Waste treatment, Creosote, Slurry bio-reac-
tors, Innovative treatment technologies.

275

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:

Groundwater Technologies

1427 Respirometrtc Methods for Determination of
Biodegradability and Biodegradation Kinetics for
Hazardous Organic Pollutant Compounds

Order Number PB92-217108CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab.; Cincinnati Univ., OH. Dept. of
Chemical and Nuclear Engineering; 1992

The purpose of the study was to obtain information on bio-
logical treatability of the benzene, phenol, phthalate and
ketone organics and of the Superfund CERCLA organics
bearing wastes in wastewater treatment systems which will
support development of an EPA technical guidance docu-
ment on the discharge of the above organics to POTWs. The
study was to generate basic information on the fate of
CERCLA leachate organics during on-site treatment and bio-
degradation and inhibition data for pollutants found in Super-
fund site wastewater that could be discharged to POTWs.
Respirometrtc biodegradability, biokinetic and inhibition data
were generated for the selected RCRA benzene, phenolic,
phthalate and ketone compounds.

Specifications; Presented at the ACS Environmental Chem-
istry Division Symposium on Chemical and Biochemical De-
toxification of Hazardous Wastes II, Miami Beach, Fl , Sep-
tember 10-15, 1989. Prepared in cooperation with Cincinnati
Univ., OH. Dept. of Chemical and Nuclear Engineering. 39p.
Subject index keywords: Waste disposal, Biodeterioration,
Organic compounds, Kinetics, Sewage treatment, Biological
treatment, Electrolytic respirometry.

1428 Slurry Biodegradation

Order Number PB91-228049CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
In a slurry biodegradation system, an aqueous slurry is cre-
ated by combining soil or sludge with water. This slurry is
then biodegraded aerobically using a self-contained reactor
or in a lined lagoon. Thus, slurry biodegradation can be com-
pared to an activated sludge process or an aerated lagoon,
depending on the case. There are two main objectives for
using the technology: to destroy the organic contaminant
and, equally important, to reduce the volume of contaminat-
ed material. Slurry biodegradation can be the sole treatment
technology in a complete cleanup system, or it can be used
in conjunction with other biological, chemical, and physical
treatment. It may be demonstrated in the Superfund Innova-
tive Technology Evaluation (SITE) program. Commercial-
scale units are in operation. Vendors should be contacted to
determine the availability of a unit for a particular site. The
bulletin provides information on the technology applicability,
the types of residuals produced, the latest performance data,
site requirements, the status of the technology, and sources
for further information.

Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response. 10p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Biodeterior-
ation, Waste treatment, Slurries, Soil treatment.

TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM
IMPLEMENTATION: Groundwater
Technologies

1429 Advanced Oxidation Technologies for the
Treatment of Contaminated Groundwater

Order Number PB94-137353CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab.; PRC Environmental
Management, Inc., Chicago, IL; 1994
The paper presents information on two pilot-field applications
of advanced oxidation technologies for contaminated ground-
water with organics. The Ultrox technology was demonstrat-
ed in 1989 with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) program
at the Lorentz Barrel and Drum (LB&D) site in San Jose,
California. Peroxidation Systems technology was applied at
the Old O-Field site located within the Aberdeen Proving
Ground, in Maryland. The information presented includes a
description of the technologies, factors affecting the technol-
ogies, and results from the two pilot-scale studies of the UV/
oxidation treatment system applications.

Specifications: Pub. in Chemical Oxidation - Technologies
for the Nineties, v2 p406-417. Prepared in cooperation with
PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Chicago, IL. 14p.
Subject index keywords: Ground water, Water pollution
control, Oxidation.

1430 Applicability of Land Disposal Restrictions to RCRA
and CERCLA Ground Water Treatment Reinjection
Superfund Management Review: Recommendation No.

Order Number PB91-921332CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 27 Dec 89
The directive discusses whether or not ground water con-
taminated with restricted RCRA hazardous wastes, which is
extracted during RCRA corrective action or CERCLA re-
sponse action must meet the best demonstrated available
technology (BDAT) identified for that waste under the RCRA
land disposal restrictions (LDRs) prior to each reinjection.
The directive explains EPA's interpretation of whether the
LDRs are applicable or (under CERCLA response actions
only) relevant and appropriate to such reinjections or to the
remediation as a whole.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Land Disposal Restrictions.

1431 Basic Concepts of Contaminant Sorption at
Hazardous Waste Sites (Ground Water Issue)

Order Number PB91 191007CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Lab., Ada, OK; Oct
90

The Regional Superfund Ground Water Forum is a group of
ground-water scientists, representing EPA's Regional Super-
fund Offices, organized to exchange up-to-date information

276

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:

Groundwater Technologies

related to ground-water remediation of Superfund sites. One
of the major issues of concern to the Forum is the transport
and fate of contaminants in soil and ground water as related
to subsurface remediation. Processes which influence the
behavior of contaminants in the subsurface must be consid-
ered both in evaluating the potential for movement as well as
In designing remediation activities at hazardous waste sites.
Such factors not only tend to regulate the mobility of con-
taminants, but also their form and stability. Sorption is often
the paramount process controlling the behavior of contami-
nants in the subsurface. The paper summarizes the basic
concepts of sorption in soil and ground water with emphasis
on nonpolar organic contaminants.

Specifications: 9p.

Subject index keywords: Ground water, Hazardous materi-
als, Sorption, Superfund, Remedial action, Waste disposal,
Water pollution control.

1432 Biodegradation of Creosote and Pentachlorophenol
in Contaminated Groundwater: Chemical and Biological
Assessment

Order Number PB92-129659CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Research Lab., Gulf Breeze, FL; Southern
BioProducts, Inc., Pendleton, SC; c1991
Shake flask studies examined the rate and extent of biode-
gradation of pentachlorophenol (PCP) and 42 components of
coal-tar creosote present in contaminated groundwater re-
covered from the American Creosote Works Superfund site,
Pensacola, Fla. The ability of indigenous soil microorganisms
to remove these contaminants from aqueous solutions was
determined by gas chromatographic analysis of organic ex-
tracts of biotreated groundwater. Changes in potential envi-
ronmental and human health hazards associated with the
biodegradation of the material were determined at intervals
by Microtox assays and fish toxicity and teratogenicity tests.
After 14 days of incubation at 30 C, indigenous microorga-
nisms effectively removed 100, 99, 94, 88, and 87% of
measured phenolic and lower-molecular-weight polycyclic ar-
omatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and S-heterocyclic, N-heterocy-
clic, and O-heterocyclic constituents of creosote, respective-
ly. However, only 53% of the higher-molecular-weight PAHs
were degraded; PCP was not removed. Despite the removal
of a majority of the organic contaminants through biotreat-
ment, only a slight decrease in the toxicity and teratogenicity
of biotreated groundwater was observed. Data suggest that
toxicity and teratogenicity are associated with compounds
difficult to treat biologically and that one may not necessarily
rely on indigenous microorganisms to effectively remove
these compounds in a reasonable time span; to this end, al-
ternative or supplemental approaches may be necessary.
Similar measures of the toxicity and teratogenicity of treated
material may offer a simple, yet important, guide to bioreme-
diation effectiveness, (Copyright (c) 1991, American Society
for Microbiology.)

Specifications: Pub. in Applied and Environmental Microbi-
ology, v57 n5 p1277-1285 May 91. See also PB90-129552.
Prepared in cooperation with Southern BioProducts, Inc.,
Pendleton, SC. 11 p.

Subject index keywords: Biodeterioration, Water pollution
control, Biological treatment. Hazardous materials, Ground
water, Creosote, Phenol/pentachloro.

1433 Biological Treatment of Wood Preserving Site
Groundwater by BioTroi, Inc. Applications Analysis
Report

Older Number PB91-227983CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Paramus, NJ.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 91

The report is an evaluation of the BioTroi, Inc. Aqueous
Treatment System (BATS), a fixed-film, aerobic biological
treatment process for contaminated groundwaters and other
wastewaters. It summarizes and analyzes the results of the
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Pro-
gram's six week demonstration at the MacGillis and Gibbs
Company wood preserving site in New Brighton, MN. The
conclusions from the pilot scale demonstration study and
other available data are: (1) the fixed film aerobic process is
capable of degrading pentachlorophenol (PCP) and other or-
ganic pollutants to more than 95% removal.

Specifications: See also PB92-110048. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 51 p.

Subject index keywords: Wood preservatives, Waste treat-
ment.

1434 Chemical Enhancements to Pump-and-Treat
Remediation. Ground Water Issue

Order Number PB92-180074CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response. Oregon Graduate Inst,
of Science and Technology, Beaverton. Dept. of
Environmental Science and Engineering; Jan 92
Conventional pump-and-treat technologies are among the
most widely used systems for the remediation of contaminat-
ed ground-water. Within recent years it has become recog-
nized that these systems can require protracted periods of
time to make significant reductions in the quantity of con-
taminants associated with both the liquid and solid phases
which constitute the subsurface matrix. Evaluating the effec-
tiveness of pump-and-treat remediations at Superfund sites,
as well as attempting to improve this effectiveness, are
issues identified by the Regional Superfund Ground Water
Forum as a concern of Superfund decision makers. The
Forum is a group of ground-water scientists and engineers,
representing EPA's Regional Superfund Offices, organized to
exchange the most recent information related to ground-
water remediation at Superfund sites. Recent research has
led to a better understanding of the processes involved in
the transport and transformation of contaminants in the sub-
surface, While some of these processes are not readily ame-
nable to enhance removal by ground-water extraction, others
suggest that there are available techniques to increase the
efficiency of these types of remediation systems. The intent
of the document is to explore the use of chemical enhance-
ment to improve ground-water remediation efficiencies using
pump-and-treat technologies, and point out arenas of con-
tamination where such techniques are not practical,
specifications; See also PB86-122561, PB87-169090,
PB90-274549 and PB92-114461. Prepared in cooperation
with Oregon Graduate Inst, of Science and Technology, Bea-
verton. Dept. of Environmental Science and Engineering.
22p.

Subject index keywords: Ground water, Water pollution
control, Remedial action, Superfund.

277

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Groundwater Technologies

1435 Compendium of Federal Financial Assistance
Programs: Targeting Programs for State and Local
Ground-Water Protection

Order Number PB93-116069CDH, price; PC A06/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Ground-Water Protection; Sep 90
Contents: Agricultural Conservation; Agricultural Education/
Technical Assistance; Agricultural Pollution Control; Agricul-
tural Research; Community Development; Drinking Water
Protection; Emergency Water Assistance; Environmental Pro-
tection; Farm Ownership Credit; Hazardous Waste Manage-
ment; Pesticides Control; Rural Development; Solid Waste
Management; Superfund; Toxic Substances; Underground
Storage Tanks; Water Pollution Control; and Water Re-
sources Development.

Specifications: I02p.

Subject index keywords: Ground water, Economic assist-
ance, Project management, Water pollution control, Drinking
water.

1436 Considerations in Ground Water Remediation at
Superfund Sites

Order Number PB91-238584CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 18 Oct 89
The directive transmits findings from a study of several sites
where ground water extraction is being conducted to contain
or reduce levels of contaminants in the ground water. The
memorandum also presents several recommendations for
modifying the Superfund approach to ground water remedi-
ation.

Specifications: lOp.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste management, Water pollution control, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response.

1437 Considerations In Ground-Water Remediation at
Superfund Sites and RCRA Facilities: Update

Order Number PB92-963358CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 27 May 92
The updated directive clarifies and expands OSWER's gener-
al policy concerning remediation of contaminated ground
water, especially with regard to nonaqueous phase liquid
(NAPL) contaminants. The document promotes a consistent
and sound approach to ground water remediation at both Su-
perfund sites and RCRA facilities and reinforces OSWER's
commitment to clean up ground water contamination at
these sites.

Subject index keywords: Ground water, Pollution control,
Government policies, Superfund, Remedial action.

1438 Detoxification of Pentachlorophenol and Creosote
Contaminated Groundwater by Physical Extraction:
Chemical and Biological Assessment

Order Number PB92-129733CDH, price: PC AQ2/MF A01
Environmental Research Lab., Gulf Breeze, FL: c1991
Chemical analyses revealed that polycyclic aromatic hydro-
carbons (PAH's) and other organic compounds were present
in a perennial freshwater stream that flowed through the

abandoned American Creosote Works, designated for Super-
fund cleanup by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
A study was conducted to determine efficacy of ultrafiltration
for removal of these organics from groundwater at the Su-
perfund site. Ultrafiltration reduced the concentration of total
identified organics from 210.0 mg/L in groundwater to 1.5
mg/L in the post-filtration permeate. Tests for toxicity/terato-
genicity in embryonic inland silversides, Menidia beryllina;
and Microtox were conducted with: streamwater, untreated
groundwater, feedwater used in the ultrafiltration system and
permeate water that passed through the ultrafiltration
system. A concentration of 100% streamwater caused signif-
icant (alpha < or = 0.05) teratogenic responses in fish em-
bryos and larvae. Groundwater and feedwater caused signifi-
cant embryo toxic or teratogenic responses at concentrations
of 100, 10 and 1%; Microtox ECSO's were 0.85 and 0.48%,
respectively. In contrast, only 100% permeate water caused
significant increases in terata.

Specifications: Pub. in Archives Environmental Contamina-
tion and Toxicology, v21 p233-244 1991. See also PB87-
174934 and PB86-208543. 9p.

Subject index keywords: Water pollution control, Creosote,
Ground water, Phenol/pentachloro, Water pollution effects,
Superfund.

1439 Emerging Technologies: Bio-Recovery Systems
Removal and Recovery of Metal Ions from Groundwater

Order Number PB90-252594CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Bio-Recovery Systems, Inc., LasCruces, NM.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab; Aug 90

A series of laboratory tests and an on-site pilot scale demon-
stration of Bio-Recovery Systems' AlgaSORB technology for
the removal and recovery of mercury-contaminated ground-
water were conducted under the SITE program. Optimum
conditions were determined for mercury binding to Alga-
SORB. Conditions under which mercury could be stripped
from AigaSORB were developed. On-site, pilot scale demon-
strations with a portable waste treatment system incorporat-
ing columns containing two different AlgaSORB preparations
confirmed laboratory tests. Over 500 bed volumes of mercu-
ry-contaminated groundwater couid be successfully treated
before regeneration of the system was required. Mercury was
removed to levels below the discharge limit of 10 micro-
gram/L.

Specifications: See also Appendices, PB90-252602. Spon-
sored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 55p.

Subject index keywords: Mercury(Metal), Water pollution
control, Ground water, Superfund, Biological recovery.

1440 Emerging Technologies: Bio-Recovery Systems
Removal and Recovery of Metal Ions from Groundwater.
Appendices

Order Number PB90-252602CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
Bio-Recovery Systems, Inc., LasCruces, NM.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab; Aug 90

Now in its fourth year, the Superfund Innovative Technology
Evaluation (SITE) Program is part of EPA's research into
cleanup methods for hazardous waste sites around the
nation. Through cooperative agreements with developers, al-
ternative or innovative technologies are refined at the bench-

278

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:

Groundwater Technologies

and pilot-scale level and then demonstrated at actual sites.
EPA collects and evaluates extensive performance data on
each technology to use in remediation decision-making for
hazardous waste sites. The appendices include the laborato-
ry analysis results from two independent laboratories that
were provided split samples from Bio-Recovery Systems, Inc.
during the on-site pilot testing of Bio-Recovery's technology f
or the removal of mercury from contaminated groundwaters
during the period of November 7, 1989 to December 1, 1989.
Specifications; See also PB90-252594. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 118p.

Subject index keywords: Mercury(Melal), Water pollution
control, Ground water, Superfund, Biological recovery.

1441 EPA Site Demonstration of BioTrol Aqueous
Treatment System

Order Number PB91-182279CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Paramus, NJ.;
BioTrol, Chaska, MN.*Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; c1991
BioTrol's pilot scale, fixed-film biological system was evaluat-
ed, under the EPA's SITE program, for its effectiveness at
removing pentachlorophenol from groundwater. The demon-
stration was performed in the summer of 1989 at a wood
preserving site in New Brighton, Minnesota. The system em-
ploys indigenous microorganisms amended with a specific
pcntachlorophenol-degrading bacterium. Groundwater from a
well on the site was fed to the system at 1, 3, and 5 gpm
with no pretreatment other than pH adjustment, nutrient addi-
tion, and temperature control Each flowrate was maintained
for about two weeks while samples were collected for exten-
sive analyses. At 5 gpm, the system was capable of eliminat-
ing about 96 percent of the pentachlorophenol in the ground-
water and producing effluent with pentachlorophenol concen-
trations to about 1 ppm. At the lower flows (1 and 3 gpm)
removal was higher (about 99 percent) and effluent pentach-
lorophenol concentrations were well below 0.5 ppm. The
system consistently produced a completely nontoxic effluent
at all three flowrates. Review of other data provided by Bio-
Trol indicates that the process is also effective on other hy-
drocarbons, including solvents and fuels. The system ap-
pears to be a compact and cost-effective treatment for con-
taminated wastewaters requiring minimal operating attention
once acclimated. (Copyright (c) 1991--Air & Waste Manage-
ment Association.)

Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of the Air Pollution Control As-
sociation, v41 n2 p228-233 Feb 91. Prepared in cooperation
with BioTrol, Chaska, MN. Sponsored by Environmental Pro-
tection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering
Lab. 9p.

Subject index keywords: Biological treatment, Water pollu-
tion control, Ground water, Waste disposal, BioTrol aqueous
treatment system. Superfund Innovative Technology Evalua
tion Program.

1442 Estimating Potential for Occurrence of DNAPL at
Superfund Sites

Order Number PB92-963338COH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 92
The presence of Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquids (DNAPL)
in soils and aquifers can control the ultimate success or fail-
ure of remediation at a hazardous waste site. Because of the

complex nature of DNAPL transport and fate, however,
DNAPL may often be undetected by direct methods, leading
to incomplete site assessments and inadequate remedial de-
signs. Sites affected by DNAPL may require a different con-
ceptual framework to develop effective characterization and
remedial actions. To help site personnel determine if DNAPL-
based characterization strategies should be employed at a
particular site, a guide for estimating the potential for DNAPL
occurrence was developed. The approach, which uses histor-
ical site use information and site characterization data, is de-
scribed in the fact sheet.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Superfund, Dense nonaqueous phase liquids.

1443 Evaluating the Effectiveness of Ground Water
Extraction Systems

Order Number PB91-177386CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Lab., Ada, OK.;
CH2M/HHI, Reston, VA; c1991

The most common process for remediating contaminated
ground water is extraction and treatment. Data from 19 on-
going and completed ground water extraction systems were
collected and analyzed to evaluate the effectiveness of this
process in achieving cleanup concentration goals for ground
water. This analysis indicated several trends including: con-
tainment of ground water plumes was usually achieved; con-
taminant concentrations dropped significantly initially fol-
lowed by a leveling out; after the period of initial rapid de-
cline, the continued decreases in concentration were usually
slower than anticipated; and certain data important to opti-
mizing system design and operation had often not been col-
lected during the site characterization phase. Factors limiting
the achievement of cleanup concentration goals fell into four
basic categories: hydrogeological factors; contaminant-relat-
ed factors; continued migration from source areas and the
size of the plume itself; and system design factors. The find-
ings of the study indicate that ground water extraction is an
effective method for preventing additional migration of con-
taminant plumes and achieving risk reduction. However, the
findings indicate that in many situations, it may not be practi-
cable to rely solely on ground water extraction and treatment
to achieve health-based cleanup concentrations throughout
the contaminated zone and fulfill the primary goal of return-
ing ground water to beneficial use. This suggests several
recommendations for improving ground water response ac-
tions including: actions to contain contaminant plumes
should be initiated early; data on vertical variation of hydrau-
lic conductivity, distribution of the contaminant mass, and
partitioning of contaminants to soil or a stationary phase in
the saturated zone should generally be collected as part of
the site characterization process; remedial actions should be
implemented in stages to better utilize information on aquifer
response as the system is being designed and implemented;
remedial actions should be monitored and modified during
operation to optimize system efficiency; and methods to en-
hance extraction effectiveness and efficiency should be con-
sidered.

279

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Groundwater Technologies

Specifications: Pub. in Ground Water Monitoring Review,
v11 n1 p119-124, Winter 1991. Sponsored by CH2M/Hill,
Reston, VA, 8p.

Subject index keywords: Water pollution control, Ground
water, Extraction, Cleanup operations.

1444 Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Remedies:
Phase 2. Volume 1. Summary Report

Order Number PB92-963346CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 92
The report is the second phase of a study to evaluate the
effectiveness of ground-water extraction systems being used
to remediate ground-water contamination at hazardous waste
sites. The report was prepared in two volumes. Volume 1
contains an executive summary and chapters which discuss
the purpose, methodologies, and conclusion of the project.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Supersedes PB90-183583. See
also PB92-963347. 38p.

Subject index keywords: Ground water, Hazardous materi-
als, Remedial action, Water pollution control, Extraction,
Cleanup operations.

1445 Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Remedies:
Phase 2, Volume 2. Case Studies and Updates

Order Number PB92-963347CDH, price: PC A19/MF A04
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Feb 92
The report is the second phase of a study to evaluate the
effectiveness of ground-water extraction systems being used
to remediate ground-water contamination at hazardous waste
sites. The report was prepared in two volumes. Volume 2 dis-
cusses the case studies-individual analyses of each of the
24 sites associated with the project.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; ail others $400). Single copies also available In
paper copy or microfiche. Supersedes PB90-274440. See
also PB92-963346. 450p.

Subject index keywords: Ground water, Hazardous materi-
als, Remedial action, Water pollution control, Extraction,
Cleanup operations.

1446 Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Remedies.
Volume 2. Case Studies 1-19

Order Number PB90-274440CDH, price: PC A19
CH2M Hili Southeast, Inc., Reston, VA.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of Emergency
and Remedial Response; Oct 89

The volume was prepared as part of an evaluation of
ground-water extraction remedies completed under EPA
Contract No. 68-W8-0098. It presents 19 case studies of in-
dividual sites where ground-water extraction systems have
been implemented. The case studies present site character-
istics and discuss factors that have influenced the success
of the remedial activities.

Specifications: See also PB90-183583 and Volume 3,
PB90-274457. Portions of this document are not fully legible.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. 599p.

Subject index keywords: Ground water. Hazardous materi-
als, United States, Extraction, Waste treatment, Superfund.

1447 Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Remedies.
Volume 3. General Site Data: Data Base Reports

Order Number PB90-274457CDH, price: PC A06/MF A01
CH2M Hill Southeast, Inc., Reston, VA.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency
and Remedial Response; Oct 89

The volume is the third of a three-volume report document-
ing the results of an evaluation of ground-water extraction
remedies at hazardous waste sites. It consists of a collection
of 112 data base reports presenting general information on
sites where ground-water extraction systems are in various
stages of planning or implementation.

Specifications: See also Volume 2, PB90-274440. Spon-
sored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. 121 p.

Subject index keywords: Ground water, Hazardous materi-
als, Extraction, Water pollution control, Superfund.

1448 Evaluation of the Likelihood of DNAPL Presence at
NPL Sites: National Results

Order Number PB93-963343CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
The document presents the results of a survey undertaken
by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's)
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response (Superfund).
The survey was designed to estimate the proportion of Na-
tional Priorities List (NPL) sites where Dense Nonaqueous
Phase Liquids (DNAPLs) may be present. Earlier studies by
OERR suggested that DNAPLs may be more common at
hazardous waste sites than previously thought, and may act
as a continuing source of contamination thus reducing the
ability of pump-and-treat systems to attain cleanup goals
within expected timeframes (Evaluation of Ground Water Ex-
traction Remedies, Phase II, EPA 9355.4-05). The study rep-
resents the first systematic nation-wide review of NPL sites
designed to estimate the extent of subsurface DNAPL con-
tamination.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Liquid wastes.

1449 Evaluation of Unsaturated/Valdose Zone Models for
Superfund Sites

Order Number PB94-157765CDH, price: PC A09/MF A03
Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station, Stillwater,; Robert
S, Kerr Environmental Research Lab., Ada, OK; Mar 94
Mathematical models of water and chemical movement in
soils are being used as decision aids for defining ground-
water protection practices for Superfund sites. Numerous
transport models exist for predicting movement and degrada-
tion of hazardous chemical through soils. Many of these re-
quire extensive input parameters which include uncertainty
due to soil variability and unknown future weather. The
impact of uncertain model parameters upon the model output
is not known. Model users need an understanding of this
impact so they can measure the appropriate parameters for

280

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Groundwater Technologies

the site arid incorporate the model prediction uncertainty into
their decisions. The report summarizes research findings
which address the sensitivity and uncertainty of model output
due to uncertain input parameters. The objective of the re-
search was to determine the sensitivity and uncertainty of
travel time, concentration, mass loading and pulse width of
contaminants at the water table due to uncertainty in soil
properties such as organic carbon content, bulk density,
water content, and hydraulic conductivity. Chemical proper-
ties, such as organic carbon partition coefficient and degra-
dation half-life, were also examined. The four models select-
ed for this analysis were RITZ, VIP, CMLS and HYDRUS.
Specifications; See also PB94-157773. Sponsored by
Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Lab., Ada, OK. 197p.
Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Water flow,
Sediment transport, Ground water, Superfund.

1450 Extraction of Mercury from Groundwater Using
Immobilized Algae

Order Number PB92-121367CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; c1991
Bio-recovery Systems inc., conducted a project under the
Emerging Technology portion of the United States Environ-
mental Protection Agency's (EPAs) Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program to evaluate the ability
of immobilized algae to absorb mercury from contaminated
groundwater in laboratory studies and pilot-scale field tests.
Algae biomass was incorporated in a permeable polymeric
matrix. The product, AlgaSORB, packed into absorption col-
umns, exhibited excellent flow characteristics, and functioned
as a 'biological' ion exchange resin. A sequence of eleven
laboratory tests demonstrated the ability of the product to
absorb mercury from groundwater that contained high levels
of total dissolved solids and hard water components. Howev-
er, use of a single AlgaSORB preparation yielded non-repeat-
able results with samples collected at different times of the
year. The strategy of extracting the groundwater through two
columns containing different times of the year. The strategy
of extracting the groundwater through two columns contain-
ing different preparations of AlgaSORB was developed and
proved successful in laboratory and pilot-scale field tests.
Field test results indicate that AlgaSORB could be economi-
cally competitive with ion exchange resins for removal of
mercury, with the advantage that hardness and other dis-
solved solids do not appear to compete with heavy metals
for binding capacity. (Copyright (c) 1991-Air and Waste Man-
agement Association.)

Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of Air and Waste Management
Association, v41 n10 p1387-1393 Oct 91. 9p.

Subject index keywords: Water pollution control,
Mercury(Metal), Biological treatment, Algae,
Absorption(BioIogy), Ground water, AlgaSORB.

1451 Facilitated Transport, Series of Issue Papers (3rd)

Order Number PB91-133256CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Lab., Ada, OK; Aug
89

Facilitated transport is an issue identified by the Regional Su-
perfund Ground-Water Forum as a concern of Superfund de-
cision-makers. The issue paper presents the various facilitat-
ed transport mechanisms that have been verified in laborato-
ry experiments. Additionally, the practical considerations con-

cerning the potential role of facilitated transport at Superfund
sites are presented.

Specifications: 7p.

Subject Index keywords: Ground water, Hazardous materi-
als, Water pollution, Superfund, Environmental transport,

1452 Field Demonstration of the UV/Oxidation
Technology to Treat Ground Water Contaminated with
VOCs

Order Number PB91-163741CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab.; PRC Environmental
Management, Inc., Chicago, IL; ci990
The paper presents the field evaluation results of the ultra-
violet radiation (UV)/oxidation technology developed by
Ultrox International, Santa Ana, California. The field evalua-
tion was performed at the Lorentz Barrel & Drum (LB&D) site
in San Jose, California under the Superfund Innovative Tech-
nology Evaluation program in February and March of 1989.
The UV/oxidation technology uses UV radiation, ozone, and
hydrogen peroxide to oxidize organic contaminants in water.
At the LB&D site, this technology was evaluated in treating
ground water contaminated with volatile organic compounds
(VOCs). The Ultrox system achieved VOC removals greater
than 90 percent. Most VOCs were removed through chemical
oxidation. However, for a few VOCs, such as 1,1,1-trichlor-
oethane and 1,1-dichloroethane, stripping also contributed
toward removal. The treated ground water met the applicable
discharge standards for discharge into a local waterway at
95 percent confidence level. There were no harmful air emis-
sions to the atmosphere from the Ultrox system, which is
equipped with an off-gas treatment unit. (Copyright (c) 1990-
Air & Waste Management Association.)

Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of the Air and Waste Manage-
ment Association, v40 n4, Apr 90. Prepared in cooperation
with PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Chicago, IL. 10p.
Subject Index keywords: Water pollution control, Volatile
organic compounds, Ground water, Ultraviolet radiation, Oxi-
dation, Ultrox system,

1453 Field Evaluation of the UV/Oxidation Technology to
Treat Contaminated Groundwater. Proceedings of the
National Conference (10th). Held in Washington, DC. on
November 27-29, 1989

Order Number PB90-221672CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab.; PRC Engineering, Inc., Chicago,
IL; C1990

The paper presents the field evaluation results of the ultra-
violet radiation (UV)/oxidation technology developed by
Ultrox International, Santa Ana, California. The field evalua-
tion of the technology was performed at the Lorentz Barrel
and Drum (LB and D) site in San Jose, California, under the
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) program
from February 27 through March 10, 1989. The UV/oxidation
technology uses UV radiation, ozone, and hydrogen peroxide
to oxidize organic contaminants present in water. At the LB
and D site, this technology was evaluated in treating ground
water contaminated with volatile organic compounds (VOCs).
The Ultrox system achieved VOC removals greater than 90
percent. The majority of VOCs were removed through chemi-
cal oxidation. The treated ground water met the applicable
discharge standards (NPDES) for disposal into Coyote Creek

281

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Groundwater Technologies

at 90 percent confidence level. There were no harmful air
emissions from the Ultrox system into the atmosphere.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with PRC Engineer-
ing, Inc., Chicago, IL. 10p.

Subject index keywords: Ground water, Hazardous materi-
als, Water treatment.

1454 Filtration of Ground Water Samples for Metals
Analysis

Order Number PB90-185182CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Lab., Ada, OK.;
Illinois State Water Survey Div., Champaign. Aquatic
Chemistry Section; c1989

The filtration of a ground water samples with 0.45 microme-
ter filters for determination of 'dissolved' metals is not only
inaccurate for distinguishing between dissolved and particu-
late phases, but if used for estimates of mobile contaminant
loading in a given aquifer, may result in significant underesti-
mations.

Specifications: Pub. in Hazardous Waste and Hazardous
Materials, v6 n4 p385-393 Nov 89. Prepared in cooperation
with Illinois State Water Survey Div., Champaign. Aquatic
Chemistry Section. 11 p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Filtration,
Water analysis, Ground water, Metals, Waste disposal, Water
pollution sampling, Water pollution detection.

1455 Ground-Water Issue: Characterizing Soils for
Hazardous Waste Site Assessments

Order Number PB91-921294CDH, price; PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 91
The Regional Superfund Ground Water Forum Is a group of
ground-water scientists representing EPA's Regional Offices,
organized to exchange up-to-date information related to
ground-water remediation at hazardous waste sites. Soil
characterization at hazardous waste sites is an issue identi-
fied by the forum as a concern of CERCLA decision-makers.
Soil characterization provides data types required for deci-
sion making in three distinct RI/FS tasks: (1) Determination
of the nature and extent of soil contamination. (2) Risk as-
sessment, and determination of risk-based soil clean-up
levels. (3) Determination of the potential effectiveness of soil
remediation alternatives.

Subject index keywords: Ground water, Soil classification,
Hazardous materials, Superfund.

1456 Ground-Water Issue: Potential Sources of Error In
Ground-Water Sampling at Hazardous Waste Sites

Order Number PB94-121688CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Nevada Univ. System, Las Vegas. Desert Research Inst.;
Environmental Monitoring Systems Lab., Las Vegas, NV; Aug
92

The paper is intended to familiarize RPMs, OSCs, and field
personnel with the sources of error inherent to ground-water
sampling, and the relative impact of these errors on sample
representativeness. Elements of typical sampling protocol
will be discussed in relation to how these sources of error
can be identified and minimized. Some of the elements of
sampling protocol to be addressed include monitoring well

drilling, design, construction, and purging, sample collection
methods and devices, sample filtration, equipment decon-
tamination, sample transport and storage, and analytical
methods.

Specifications: See also PB91-181776. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Monitoring Systems Lab., Las Vegas, NV. 29p.
Subject index keywords: Superfund, Water pollution sam-
pling, Ground water.

1457 Ground-Water Issue: The Effects of Well Casing
Material on Ground Water-Quality

Order Number PB92-224724CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response. Army Engineer
Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS. Geotechnical
Lab; Oct 91

The Regional Superfund Ground Water Forum is a group of
ground-water scientists representing U.S. Environmental Pro-
tection Agency's (U.S. EPA's) Regional Offices, organized to
exchange up-to-date information related to ground-water re-
mediation at hazardous waste sites. Well casing materials
used at hazardous waste sites is an issue identified by the
forum as a concern of CERCLA decision makers. All aspects
of a ground-water sampling program have the potential to
affect the composition of a ground-water sample. The high
degree of accuracy (parts per billion (ppb) range) required of
some chemical analysis dictates that all potential sources of
error of a ground-water sampling program be identified and
sources of error in such aspects be minimized. Selection of
the proper casing material for monitoring wells has been a
subject of much controversy since the publication of the U.S.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Army Engineer
Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS. Geotechnical
Lab. 17p.

Subject index keywords: Coverings, Water wells, Water
pollution, Superfund.

1458 Ground-Water Modeling Compendium. Model Fact
Sheets, Descriptions, Applications and Assessment
Framework

Order Number PB93-207504CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response.; Wisconsin Univ.-
Madison.* * International Ground Water Modeling Center,
Indianapolis, IN; Oct 92

Models can be used to guide and complement field investi-
gations, thereby improving the understanding of the conse-
quences of site-specific hydrogeologic conditions. However,
models should not be used in lieu of field investigations and
care must be taken to ensure that models are not misused.
The intention of the Compendium is to: promote the appro-
priate use of models by increasing users' awareness about
the strengths, weaknesses and inherent uncertainties associ-
ated with ground-water models and modeling in general; and
support model users and decision-makers by providing a
convenient source of information on how to oversee model-
ing projects, how certain models have been applied in the
context of hazardous waste/Superfund programs, and the
characteristics of four specific ground-water models.
Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Wisconsin
Univ.-Madison, and International Ground Water Modeling
Center, Indianapolis, IN. 157p.

282

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:

Groundwater Technologies

Subject index keywords; Ground water movement, Path of
pollutants, Model studies.

1459 Ground Water Sampling for Metals Analyses.
Superfund Ground Water Issue

Order Number PB91-133249CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 89
Filtration of ground-water samples for metals analysis is an
issue identified by the Regional Superfund Ground Water
Forum as a concern of Superfund decision-makers.
RSKERL-Ada and EMSL-Las Vegas convened a technical
committee of experts in the areas of ground-water geochem-
istry, inorganic chemistry, colloidal transport and ground-
water sampling technology to examine the issue and provide
technical guidance based on current scientific information.
The findings and recommendations of the committee were
that use of a 0.45 micron filter was not useful, appropriate or
reproducible in providing information on metals mobility in
ground-water systems, nor was it appropriate for determina-
tion of truly 'dissolved' constituents in ground water. A dual
sampling approach was recommended, with collection of
both filtered and unfiltered samples. This means that added
emphasis is placed on appropriate well construction meth-
ods, materials and ground-water sampling procedures.
Specifications: 8p.

Subject Index keywords: Ground water, Hazardous materi-
als, Water pollution, Superfund.

1460 Guidance tor Evaluating the Technical
Impracticability of Ground-Water Restoration

Order Number PB93-963507CDH, price; PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Sep 93
The document outlines EPA's approach to evaluating the
technical impracticability of attaining requiredground-water
cleanup levels and establishing alternative, protective reme-
dial strategies where restoration is determined to be techni-
cally impracticable.

Subject index keywords: Ground water, Water pollution
control, Feasibility.

1461 Guide on Remedial Actions for Contaminated
Ground Water

Order Number PB90-272576CDH, price; PC AQ2/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 89
The fact sheet summarizes the key issues in the develop-
ment, evaluation, and selection of ground water Remedial
Actions at Superfund sites, including CERCLA requirements,
project planning, and remedial action objectives as presented
in the comprehensive guidance.

Specifications: 9p.

Subject Index keywords: Ground water, Water pollution,
Superfund, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.

1462 Guide to Pump and Treat Groundwater Remediation
Technology

Order Number PB91-921356CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 90
The fact sheet summarizes how to use available hydrogeolo-
gical and chemical data to determine when, where, and how
pump-and-treat technology can be used successfully to con-
tain and remediate contaminant plumes, it is based on Office
of Research and Development's Basics of Pump-and-Treat
Ground-Water Remediation Technology, EPA/600/8-90/003.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Bp.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Water pollution control, Office of Soiid
Waste and Emergency Response.

1463 Hydrogeology and Results of Aquifer Tests in the
Vicinity of a Hazardous-Waste Disposal Site Near Byron,
Illinois

Order Number PB90-130188CDH, price; PC A04/MF A01
Geological Survey, Reston, VA. Water Resources Div,;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; Jul 89
The U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the U.S. En-
vironmental Protection Agency, conducted a hydrogeologic
investigation of a Superfund Site near Byron, Illinois. The
purpose of the Investigation was to determine the hydrogeo-
logic properties that control the movement of water through
the Galena-Platteville and St. Peter aquifers. These are the
primary domestic water-supply aquifers in the area. Move-
ment of water in the dolomites is mainly through joints, frac-
tures, and solution openings. Ground-water flow in the study
area is from the salvage yard northwestward to the Rock
River. Ground water recharges from the dolomite to the St.
Peter aquifer beneath the salvage yard and discharges from
the Quaternary alluvial aquifer at the river. Analysis of the
Galena-Platteville aquifer-test data indicates that the calculat-
ed aquifer transmissivity ranges from 490 to 670 feet
squared per day, and the calculated specific yield ranges
from 0.017 to 0,140.

Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC. 85p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Hydrogeo-
logy, Waste disposal, Superfund site.

1464 Identification and Compilation of Unsaturated/
Vadose Zons Mod&ls

Order Number PB94-157773CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
Colorado School of Mines, Golden. International Ground
Water Modeling Center.; Robert S. Kerr Environmental
Research Lab., Ada, OK; Mar 94

The present report contains the result of research and infor-
mation processing activities supporting evaluation of the ca-
pabilities of various unsaturated zone flow and transport
models in predicting the movement of hazardous chemical
through soils to ground water. It provides an overview of
major types of models applicable to problems in the unsatu-
rated zone of the subsurface. As chemical transport in soils
is often driven by the movement of water, both flow and
chemical transport models are included. To manage the rap-
idly growing amount of information, IGWMC maintains a de-

283

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Groundwater Technologies

scriptive model information system, MARS (Model Annotation
Search and Retrieval System). Detailed information on the
reviewed models is presented in a series of tables.
Specifications: See also PB94-157765. Sponsored by
Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Lab., Ada, OK. 137p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Water flow,
Sediment transport, Ground water, Superfund.

1465 In-sftu Bioremediation of Contaminated Ground
Water

Order Number PB92-224336CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Feb 92
In-situ bioremediation, where applicable, appears to be a po-
tential cost-effective and environmentally acceptable remedi-
ation technology. Suflita (1989) identified characteristics of
the ideal candidate site for successful implementation of in-
situ bioremediation. These characteristics included: (1) a ho-
mogeneous and permeable aquifer; (2) a contaminant origi-
nating from a single source; (3) a low ground-water gradient;
(4) no free product; (5) no soil contamination; and (6) an
easily degraded, extracted, or immobilized contaminant. Ob-
viously, few sites meet these characteristics. However, devel-
opment of information concerning site specific geological and
microbiological characteristics of the aquifer, combined with
knowledge concerning potential chemical, physical, and bio-
chemical fate of the wastes present, can be used to develop
a bioremediation strategy for a less-than-ideal site.
Specifications: See also PB89-219976. 13p.

Subject index keywords: Water pollution control, Biological
treatment, Ground water, Remedial action.

1466 In situ Treatment of Contaminated Ground Water:
An Inventory of Research and Field Demonstrations and
Strategies for Improving Ground Water Remediation
Technologies

Order Number PB93-193720CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Jan 93
The predominance of ground-water contamination at hazard-
ous waste sites and the dearth of methods to efficiently treat
this contamination is a problem that the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) is examining. The contaminated
ground water found at most Superfund sites is often the limit-
ing factor for complete site remediation. The purpose of the
document is to describe recent research, development and
application of technologies that either treat ground-water
contaminants in place or improve the solubility and mobility
of contaminants to enhance pump-and-treat remediation ef-
fectiveness. The report discusses techniques that can be ap-
plied in situ and excludes pumping methodologies or surface
treatment systems. In addition, the publication presents con-
clusions based on observations of the survey. Finally, strate-
gies for action for stakeholders concerned with in situ
ground-water technology development are presented. The
study has not defined the extent or activities of research and
development outside of EPA-supported groups.
Specifications: See also PB92-224336. 22p.

Subject index keywords: Ground water, Water pollution
control, Remedial action, Waste disposal, Hazardous materi-
als, In-situ processing.

1467 Measurement of Hydraulic Conductivity
Distributions: A Manual of Practice

Order Number PB91-211938CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Auburn Univ., AL. Dept. of Civil Engineering.; Geological
Survey, Denver, CO.'Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research
Lab., Ada, OK; Mar 90

The ability of hydrologists to perform field measurements of
aquifer hydraulic properties must be enhanced in order to
significantly improve the capacity to solve ground water con-
tamination problems at Superfund and other sites. The pri-
mary purpose of the manual is to provide new methodologies
for measuring K(z), the distribution of horizontal hydraulic
conductivity in the vertical direction in the vicinity of a test
well. Measurements in nearby wells can then be used to esti-
mate three-dimensional distributions. As dispersion-dominat-
ed models (particularly two-dimensional, vertically-averaged
models) approach their limitations, it is becoming increasingly
important to develop two-dimensional vertical profile or fully
three-dimensional advection-dominated transport models in
order to significantly increase the ability to understand and
predict contaminant transport, reaction, and degradation in
the field. Such models require the measurement of hydraulic
conductivity distributions, K(z), rather than vertically averaged
values in the form of transmiss'vities. Three devices for
measuring K(z) distributions (the impeller flowmeter, the
heat-pulse flowmeter, and a multi-level slug test apparatus)
are described in detail, along with application and data re-
duction procedures. Results of the various methods are com-
pared with each other and with the results of tracer studies.
The flowmeter approach emerged as the best candidate for
routine K(z) measurements. Impeller meters are now avail-
able commercially, and the more sensitive flowmeters (heat
pulse and electromagnetic) are expected to be available in
the near future.

Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Geological
Survey, Denver, CO. Sponsored by Robert S. Kerr Environ-
mental Research Lab., Ada, OK. 73p.

Subject index keywords: Water pollution, Hydraulic conduc-
tivity, Aquifers.

1468 Membrane Treatment of Wood Preserving Site
Groundwater by SBP Technologies, Inc. Applications
Analysis Report

Order Number PB94-131646CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Aug 93
The document provides an evaluation of the SBP Technol-
ogies, Inc. (SBP) formed-in-place membrane hyperfiltration
process. The purpose of the technology is to reduce the
volume of waste requiring further treatment through such
techniques as immobilization or destruction. In hyperfiltration,
pollutants are separated on the basis of molecular weight,
molecular size, polarity, or charge. The report summarizes
the utility and application of SBP's membrane system to the
treatment of organic contaminated wastewater. This analysis
utilizes information from the Superfund Innovative Technolo-
gy Evaluation (SITE) Program's demonstration at the Ameri-
can Creosote Works wood preserving site in Pensacola, Flor-
ida as well as data from other SBP investigations. Conclu-
sions were reached concerning the technological effective-
ness and economics of the process and its suitability for use
at other sites and with other waste waters.

Specifications: 56p.

284

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Groundwater Technologies

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Water pollution con-
trol, Filtration, Membranes.

1469 Methods for Evaluating the Attainment of Cleanup
Standards. Volume 2, Ground Water

Order Number PB94-138815CDH, price: PC A16/MF A03
Westat, Inc., Rockville, MD. Research Div.; Dynamac Corp.,
Rockville, MD.**SRA Technologies, Inc., Alexandria,
VA.*Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Statistical Policy Branch; Jul 92

The reference document provides regional project managers,
on-site coordinators, and their contractors with sampling and
analysis methods for evaluating whether ground water reme-
diation has met pre-established cleanup standards for one or
more chemical contaminants at a hazardous waste site. The
verification of cleanup by evaluating a site relative to a clean-
up standard or an applicable or relevant and appropriate re-
quirement (ARAR) is mandated in Section 121 of the Super-
fund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA). The
document, the second in a series, provides sampling and
data analysis methods for the purpose of verifying attainment
of a cleanup standard in ground water. The first volume ad-
dresses evaluating attainment in soils and solid media.
Volume 2 presents statistical methods which can be used to
address the uncertainty of whether a site has met a cleanup
standard.

Specifications: See also Volume 1, PB89-234959. Prepared
In cooperation with Dynamac Corp., Rockville, MD., and SRA
Technologies, Inc., Alexandria, VA. Sponsored by Environ-
mental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Statistical Policy
Branch. 358p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Standards,
Ground water, Pollution control.

1470 New Approach and Methodologies for
Characterizing the Hydrogeologic Properties of Aquifers

Order Number PB90-187063CDH, price: PC A11/MF A02
Auburn Univ., AL, Dept. of Civil Engineering.; Robert S. Kerr
Environmental Research Lab., Ada, OK; Jan 90
In the authors' opinion, the ability of hydrologists to perform
field measurements of aquifer hydraulic properties must be
enhanced if they are to improve significantly the capacity to
solve ground water contamination problems at Superfund
and other sites. Therefore, the primary purpose of the report
is to provide motivation and new methodology for measuring
K(z), the distribution of horizontal hydraulic conductivity in the
vertical direction in the vicinity of a test well. Measurements
in nearby wells can then be used to build up three-dimen-
sional distributions. For completeness, and to enhance the
usefulness of the report as a field manual, existing methodol-
ogy for the measurement of effective porosity, vertical hy-
draulic conductivity, storativity and hydraulic head, are pre-
sented also. It is argued that dispersion-dominated models,
particularly two-dimensional, vertically-averaged (areal)
models, have been pushed about as far as they can go, and
that two-dimensional vertical profile or fully three-dimensional
advection-dominated transport models are necessary if they
are to increase significantly the ability to understand and pre-
dict contaminant transport, reaction, and degradation in the
field. Such models require the measurement of hydraulic
conductivity distributions, K(z), rather than vertically averaged
values in the form of transmissivities.

Specifications: Sponsored by Robert S. Kerr Environmental
Research Lab., Ada, OK. 237p,

Subject Index keywords: Aquifers, Hydrogeology, Water
pollution, Waste disposal, Ground water, Mathematical
models, Environmental transport.

1471 Performance Evaluations of Pump-and-Treat
Remediations

Order Number PB92-114461CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Keely (Joseph F.), Portland, OR.; Robert S. Ken-
Environmental Research Lab., Ada, OK; Oct 89
The report contains an overview of the processes affecting
the mobility of contaminants through the subsurface, and the
ability to pump the contaminants from the subsurface for
treatment. It points out the limitations of pump-and-trcat re-
mediation techniques and stresses the importance of proper
site characterization and the relevance of computer modeling
as a performance evaluation technique.

Specifications: See also PB90-274549, Sponsored by
Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Lab., Ada, OK, 21 p.
Subject index keywords: Water pollution, Ground water,
Water treatment.

1472 Potential Sources of Error in Ground-Water
Sampling at Hazardous Waste Sites. Ground Water Issue

Order Number PB94-134376CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Center for
Environmental Research Information; Aug 92
The Regional Superfund Ground Water Forum is a group of
ground-water scientists representing the U.S. EPA's Regional
Superfund Offices that was organized to exchange up-to-
date information related to ground-water remediation at Su-
perfund sites. The paper is intended to familiarize RPMs,
OSCs, and field personnel with the sources of error inherent
to ground-water sampling, and the relative impact of these
errors on sample representativeness. Elements of typical
sampling protocol will be discussed in relation to how these
sources of error can be identified and minimized.
Specifications: See also DE88014685, PB91 -133249, and
PB92-114503. 30p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Ground
water, Sampling.

1473 Remediation Completed: But Is the Groundwater
Meeting the Safe Drinking Water Act Requirements.
Haztech Internationa! 90. Held in Houston, Texas on May
8-10, 1990

Order Number PB90-262999CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; May 90

Groundwater treatment is a theme that runs through several
of EPA's programs including Drinking Water, Superfund, Un-
derground Storage Tanks, RCRA, etc. Frequently the same
terms are used in the different programs with quite different
meanings. For example, the phrase 'pump and treat' means
one thing when one is considering treating groundwater for
potable purposes and something quite different for superfund
remediation. Another confusing term is 'site remediation'.
Site remediation can mean different things to different
people depending on their particular point-of-view. Still an-
other problem is the development of technology under one
program that could be used effectively in another program.
Institutional barriers frequently limit the transfer of useful re-
search between programs. The purpose of the paper is to

285

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Incineration & Thermal Technologies

discuss technology research being conducted in drinking
water that might be useful to some of these other programs.
Specifications: 22p.

Subject index keywords: Ground water, Potable water,
Drinking water.

1474 Subsurface Contamination Reference Guide

Order Number PB91-921292CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 90
The guide was developed to provide a source of information
pertaining to important fate and transport properties for a va-
riety of contaminants commonly found in ground water at Su-
perfund sites. The information may help to focus site investi-
gation efforts and identify early-on potential remediation
strategies. Information pertaining to contaminat fate and
transport properties have been presented in tabular form and
provided as separately published charts for easy reference.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. Package includes three parts: Ref-
erence Guide; Reference Tables 1 and 2 (EPA/540/2-90/
011 A); Reference Table 3 (EPA/540/2-90/011B). 26p.
Subject index keywords: Ground water, Hazardous materi-
als, Superfund.

1475 Suggested ROD Language for Various Ground
Water Remediation Options

Order Number PB91-921325CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 10 Oct 90
The directive provides supplemental guidance to the October
18, 1989 OSWER directive 9355.4-03, entitled 'Consideration
in Ground Water Remediation at Superfund Sites,' which ex-
amined the role of ground water remediation in Superfund
cleanups and recommends modifications to the current ap-
proach. It offers suggested language for Records of Decision
corresponding to the recommendations 1 and 2 from the
OSWER Directive. The recommendations are: (1) initiation of
early or interim response measures; and (2) provision for
changes in the remedy during implementation in the Record
of Decision. The Directive offers standard language that may
be employed, when appropriate, to correspond to site-specif-
ic remediation scenarios. Language is suggested for Final
Actions, Contingency Measures/Goals, and Interim Actions.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $150 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $300). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 10p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Water pollution control, Remedial
action, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response,
Records of Decision.

1476 Superfund Ground Water Issue: Accuracy of Depth
to Water Measurements. 2nd in Series of Issue Papers

Order Number PB90-149840CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Lab., Ada, OK; Aug
89

The accuracy of depth to water measurements is an issue
identified by the Regional Superfund Ground Water forum as
a concern of Superfund decision-makers as they attempt to
determine direction of ground-water flow, areas of recharge

or discharge, the hydraulic characteristics of aquifers, or the
effects of manmade stresses on the ground-water system.
The wetted graduated steel tape, electrical and air line meth-
ods are discussed along with frequency of measurements.
The graduated steel tape method is considered to be the
most accurate for measuring the water level in nonflowing
wells.

Specifications: 5p.

Subject Index keywords: Ground water, Water levels,
Water quality management, Water pollution, Superfund pro-
gram.

1477 Superfund Ground Water Issue. Contaminant
Transport in Fractured Media: Models for Decision
Makers

Order Number PB90-268517CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 89
The Regional Superfund Ground Water Forum is a group of
ground-water technical specialists, representing EPA's Re-
gional Superfund Offices, organized to exchange up-to-date
information related to ground-water remediation at Superfund
sites. Mathematical models have a potentially useful role to
play in arriving at a decision on the remedial action to be
taken at a contaminated site. Where there is a need for a
quantitative estimate of the threat to public health resulting
from a particular course of action, of the estimated cost and
time of clean-up for a particular remediation strategy, or of
the results of other actions to be taken at a contaminated
site, mathematical models have a greater potential to provide
the needed information than any other approach to the prob-
lem. For contaminated sites in fractured rock, however, this
potential has yet to be realized.

Specifications: 10p.

Subject index keywords: Ground water, Hazardous materi-
als, Superfund.

TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM
IMPLEMENTATION: Incineration &
Thermal Technologies

1478 Evaluation of Commercially-Available Portable Gas
Chromatographs

Order Number PB93-121051CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
IIT Research Inst., Chicago, IL; ManTech Environmental
Technology, Inc., Research Triangle Park,

NC.*Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle
Park, NC. Atmospheric Research and Exposure Assessment
Lab; 1992

Six commercially-available portable gas chromatographs
(PGC) were evaluated at a Superfund site during startup of
bioremediation. Concentrations of volatile organic com-
pounds (VOC) were slightly above ambient background
levels. Concurrent colocated grab samples were collected
periodically in Summa-polished canisters. They were ana-
lyzed by Method TO-14 using a mass-sensitive detector. The
grab samples served as standards to assess the accuracy of
data reported by the PGCs.

Specifications: See also PB88-211701. Prepared in coop-
eration with ManTech Environmental Technology, Inc., Re-
search Triangle Park, NC. Sponsored by Environmental Pro-

286

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Incineration & Thermal Technologies

tection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Atmospheric
Research and Exposure Assessment Lab. 8p.

Subject index keywords: Chromatographic analysis, Haz-
ardous materials, Superfund.

1479 Evaluation of Portable Gas Chromatographs

Order Number PB93-168813CDH, price; PC A03/MF A01
IIT Research Inst., Chicago, IL.; ManTech Environmental
Technology, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NG.**Sattelle
Columbus Labs., QH,*EnvironmentaI Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, NC. Atmospheric Research and
Exposure Assessment Lab; 1993

Limits of detection, linearity of responses, and stability of re-
sponse factors and retention times for five commercially-
available portable gas chromatographs (PGC) were deter-
mined during laboratory evaluation. The PGCs were also op-
erated at the French Limited Superfund site near Houston,
TX during startup of bioremediation. Concentrations of vola-
tile organic compounds (VOC) at the site were slightly above
ambient background levels. Concurrent collocated grab sam-
ples were collected periodically in canisters and analyzed by
Method TO-14 using a mass-selective detector. Canister
data were taken to indicate correct concentrations and were
used to assess the accuracy of PGC data. Durability, reliabil-
ity, and complexity of operation of PGCs were also evaluat-
ed. The principal goal of the study was to determine the best
way to use each instrument as a monitor for airborne VOCs.
Specifications: See also PB90-127374 and PB93-121051.
Prepared in cooperation with ManTech Environmental Tech-
nology, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC., and Battelle Co-
lumbus Labs., OH. Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Atmospheric Research
and Exposure Assessment Lab. 14p,

Subject index keywords: Gas chromatography, Volatile or-
ganic compounds, Air pollution, Portable equipment.

1480 Mobile incineration: An Analysis of the Industry

Order Number PB90-255449CDH, price: PC A04/MF AC1
Management Associates, Natick, MA.; Versar, Inc.,

Springfield, VA/Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, DC. Office of Solid Waste; 30 Jun 89
The report examines the mobile incineration industry, includ-
ing the supply of and demand for mobile incineration and an
assessment of the incineration market. It was prepared
based on a need to examine mobile incineration that became
apparent during the Environmental Protection Agency's
(EPA) analysis of hazardous waste treatment capacity. EPA
wanted to evaluate whether mobile incinerators can absorb
the demand that other treatment facilities, such as fixed-
based incinerators, cannot handle.

Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Versar, Inc.,
Springfield, VA. Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Solid Waste. 67p.

Subject index keywords: Incinerators, Mobile equipment,
Waste disposal, Hazardous materials.

1481 Mobile/Transportable Incineration Treatment

Order Number PB91-228023CDH, price; PC A02/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
Incineration treats organic contaminants in solids and liquids
by subjecting them to temperatures typically greater than
1000F in the presence of oxygen, which causes the volatili-

zation, combustion, and destruction of these compounds.
The bulletin describes mobile/transportable incineration sys-
tems that can be moved to and subsequently removed from
Superfund and other hazardous waste sites. It does not ad-
dress other thermal processes that operate at lower tem-
peratures or those that operate at very high temperatures,
such as plasma arc. It is applicable to a wide range of organ-
ic wastes and is generally not used treating inorganics and
metals. Mobile/transportable incinerators exhibit essentially
the same environmental performance as their stationary
counterparts. To date, 49 of the 95 records of decision
(RODs) designating thermal remedies at Superfund sites
have selected onsite incineration as an integral part of a pre-
ferred treatment alternative. There are 22 commercial-scale
units in operation. The bulletin provides the latest perform-
ance data, site requirements, the status of the technology,
and where to go for further information.

Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response. 10p.

Subject index keywords: Incineration, Portable equipment,
Hazardous materials, Waste treatment, Organic compounds.

1482 Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
Incineration Research Facility: Annual Report for FY89

Order Number PB90-186339CDH, price; PC A04/MF A01
Acurex Corp., Jefferson, AR.: Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab;
Mar 90

The Environmental Protection Agency's Incineration Re-
search Facility in Jefferson, Arkansas, is an experimental fa-
cility which houses two pilot-scale incinerators and the asso-
ciated waste handling emission control, process control, and
safety equipment, as well as onsite laboratory facilities.
During Fiscal Year 1989, a major facility expansion and re-
configuration construction effort was completed. Upon com-
pletion of the construction, incineration testing at the Facility
was resumed. Hazardous waste incinerator trace metal emis-
sion regulation development for the Office of Solid Waste
and a Superfund site remediation treatability study for Region
I and the Office of Emergency and Remedial Response were
major program support activities in Fiscal Year 1989.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
73 p.

Subject index keywords: Research projects, Test cham-
bers, Hazardous materials, Waste disposal, Air pollution con-
trol equipment, Soils, US EPA, Incineration, Air pollution sam-
pling.

1483 Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
Incineration Research Facility: Annual Report for FY90

Order Number PB91-182493CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Acurex Corp., Jefferson, AR.; Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; Apr
91

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Incineration Re-
search Facility in Jefferson, Arkansas, is an experimental fa-
cility that houses two pilot-scale incinerators and the associ-
ated waste handling, emission control, process control, and
safety equipment; as well as onsite laboratory facilities.
During fiscal year 1990, two major test programs were com-
pleted at the facility: an evaluation of the thermal-stability-

287

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Incineration & Thermal Technologies

based principal organic hazardous constituent incinerability
ranking for the Office of Solid Waste (OSW), and an incinera-
bility evaluation of five contaminated materials from the
Purity Oil Sales and the McColl Superfund sites for Region 9
and the Office of Emergency and Remedial Response
(OERR). In addition, results of two test programs completed
in FY89 were reported: an evaluation of the fate of trace
metals fed to a rotary kiln incinerator equipped with a single-
stage ionizing wet scrubber for air pollution control for OSW,
and an incinerability evaluation of arsenic and pesticide con-
taminated soils from the Baird and McGuire Superfund site
for Region 1 and OERR. Several facility and equipment con-
struction and upgrade efforts were also completed.
Specifications: See also report for FY89, PB90-186339.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 67p,

Subject index keywords; Incineration, Waste disposal, Haz-
ardous materials, Air pollution control equipment, Environ-
mental research.

1484 Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
Incineration Research Facility: Annual Report for FY91

Order Number PB92-239540CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Acurex Corp., Mountain View, CA. Environmental Systems
Div,; Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Mar 92
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Incineration Re-
search Facility (IRF) in Jefferson, Arkansas, is an experimen-
tal facility that houses two pilot-scale incinerators and the as-
sociated waste handling, emission control, process control,
and safety equipment; as well as onsite laboratory facilities.
During fiscal year 1991, five major test programs were com-
pleted at the facility: tests to establish residue characteristics
from the incineration of spent potliners from aluminum pro-
duction (K088) for the Office of Solid Waste (OSW); an eval-
uation of the incinerability of five contaminated soils from the
Drake Chemical Superfund site for Region 3; an evaluation
of the incinerability of PCB-contaminated marine sediments
from the New Bedford Harbor Superfund site for Region 1; a
parametric evaluation of the fate of trace metals in a rotary
kiln incinerator equipped with a Calvert high-efficiency scrub-
ber system; and an evaluation of incinerability of arsenic-con-
taminated soil from the Chemical Insecticide Corporation Su-
perfund site for Region 2.

Specifications: See also PB91-182493. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 117p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Incinerators,
Waste disposal, Air pollution control.

1485 Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
Incineration Research Facility: Annual Report for FY92

Order Number PB94-114659CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Acurex Environmental Corp., Jefferson, AR.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab; Jun 93

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Incineration Re-
search Facility (IRF) in Jefferson, Arkansas, is an experimen-
tal facility that houses two pilot-scale incinerators and the as-
sociated waste handling, emission control, process control,
and safety equipment; as well as onsite laboratory facilities.
During fiscal year 1992, three major test programs were
completed at the facility: an evaluation of the incinerability of
two contaminated sludges from the Bofors-Nobel Superfund

site for Region 5, an evaluation of the incinerability of PCB-
contaminated soil from the Scientific Chemical Processing
Superfund site for Region 2, and an evaluation of the effects
of repeated incinerator waste feed cutoffs on incinerator par-
ticulate, HCI, trace metal, and organic constituent emissions
for the Office of Solid Waste and the EPA incinerator permit
writers.

Specifications: See also PB92-239540. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 120p.

Subject index keywords: Incineration, Hazardous materials,
Research projects.

1486 Potential Surrogate Metals for Incinerator Trial
Burns

Order Number PB94-162716CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Acurex Environmental Corp., Jefferson, AR.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab; 1994

Over the past four years, the research program at the Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) Incinerator Research
Facility (IRF) has developed an extensive body of metals
partitioning data from pilot-scale incineration tests using syn-
thetic hazardous wastes, actual listed hazardous wastes, and
contaminated materials from Superfund sites. Because
metals volatility dominates partitioning, surrogates can be
used and the choice of surrogates is simplified. The paper
discusses the results of three extensive parametric test pro-
grams performed at the IRF using synthetic hazardous
wastes containing both hazardous constituent and potential
surrogate metals. These results show that surrogates parti-
tion in the same manner as selected hazardous constituent
metals. Thus, the use of surrogates deserves consideration,
if not in actual trial burns, then at least in scoping tests used
to guide the formal trial burn.

Specifications: Pub. in Proceedings of the 1993 Inciner-
ation Conference, Knoxville, TN., May 3-7, 1993, p434-44Q.
See also PB90-263864, PB90-263872, PB91-223388 and
PB91-223396. Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
11 p.

Subject index keywords: Incinerators, Scrubbers, Hazard-
ous materials, Air pollution control equipment, Meetings, Trial
burn, Metal partitioning,

1487 Thermal Desorption Treatment (February 1994)

Order Number PB94-160603CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Feb 94
The bulletin discusses various aspects of the thermal de-
sorption technology Including applicability, limitations of its
use, residuals produced, performance data, site require-
ments, status of the technology, and sources of further infor-
mation. The document is an update of the original bulletin
published in May 1991 (PB92-228080).

Specifications: See also PB91-228080, PB93-126597 and
PB93-133387. Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH, Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
Hp-

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste treatment,
Thermal desorption.

288

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Soil

Cleanup Technologies

TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

IMPLEMENTATION: Soil Cleanup
Technologies

1488 Analysis of Treatability Data for Soil and Debris:
Evaluation of Land Ban Impact on Use of Superfund
Treatment Technologies

Order Number PB90-258476CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 30 Nov 89
The directive summarizes the effectiveness of treatment
technologies for contaminated soil and debris and provides
support for decisions by the Regions to use treatability var-
iances for complying with the RCRA Land Ban Disposal Re-
strictions.

Specifications: 25p,

Subject Index keywords: Regulations, Superfund, Remedial
action, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Soil
contamination, Land Disposal Restrictions.

1489 Aseptic Sampling of Unconsolidated Heaving Soils
in Saturated Zones

Order Number PB91-216218CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Lab., Ada, OK; 1991
Collecting undisturbed subsurface soil samples in noncohe-
sive, heaving sandy environments below the water table has
been extremely difficult using conventional soil sampling
equipment. Several modifications of the conventional hollow-
stem auger coring procedures were adapted, which allowed
collection of depth-discreet soil samples in very fluid, heaving
sands. These methods were used where accurate subsur-
face characterization of the contamination of RCRA and
CERCLA sites was essential. Cohesionless cores were con-
sistently retrieved, aseptically extruded from the core barrel
inside an anaerobic environmental chamber, and preserved
in the field. The physical, chemical, and biological Integrity of
discreet soil intervals was maintained for laboratory analysis.
Statistical analysis of repeated collection of soil samples
from the same depth intervals in nearby boreholes was docu-
mented.

Specifications: 17p.

Subject index keywords: Subsurface investigations, Soil
analysis, Land pollution, Waste disposal, Soil contamination.

1490 BioGenesis (Trade Name) Soil Washing Technology;
Innovative Technology Evaluation Report

Order Number PB94-120045CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Rolling Meadows, IL;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; 2 Sep 93
Soil washing technologies are designed to transfer contami-
nants from soil to a liquid phase. The BioGenesis Soil Wash-
ing Technology uses soil washing with a proprietary surfac-
tant solution to transfer organic contaminants from soils to
wastewater. The BioGenesis soil washing process was evalu-
ated under the SITE program at a refinery where soils were
contaminated with crude oil. Results of chemical analyses
show that levels of total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons
(TRPH), an indicator of degraded crude oil, decreased by 65
to 73 percent in washed soils. The TRPH in residual soils
were allowed to biodcgrade for an additional 120 days. Re-
sults indicate that soil washing and biodegradation removed

85 to 88 percent of TRPH in treated soils. The Innovative
Technology Evaluation Report provides information on the
technology applicability, economic analysis, technology limi-
tations, a technology description, process residuals, site re-
quirements, latest performance data, the technology status,
vendors claims, and the source of further information.

Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH, Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
72p,

Subject Index keywords: Land pollution control, Superfund,
Soil washing.

1491 Biological Assessment of Toxicity Caused by
Chemical Constituents Eluted from Site Soils Collected
at the Drake Chemical Superfund Site, Lock Haven,
Clinton Co., Pennsylvania

Order Number PB91-186965CDH, price: PC A20
Corvallis Environmental Research Lab., OR; Feb 91
The site was used to manufacture specialty intermediate
chemicals for the producers of dyes, pharmaceuticals, cos-
metics, herbicides, and pesticides. The herbicide Fenac
(2,3,6-trichlorophenylacetic acid) is a major on- and off-site
contaminant. One-hundred-twenty-eight soils were collected.
Elutriates were prepared for toxicity evaluation of water ex-
tractable constituents. The chemical nature of the elutriates
was so complex that it was impossible to determine chemical
cause/biological effect relationships based on chemical anal-
yses alone. Bioassays identified locations of toxicity on the
site without identifying the causative agents; important be-
cause numerical criteria are not available for many organic
chemicals and there is little understanding of the affects of
mixtures of chemicals In complex wastes on test organisms
or the environment. The measured response represents an
actual assessment of any synergistic or antagonistic interac-
tions. Fifty-nine percent of the 128 elutriates were toxic to
the algae Selenastrum capricomutum and 43 percent were
toxic to Qaphnia magna. Both organisms indicated that toxic
sample numbers increased with depth of sampling. The Toxi-
chromotest (bacteria) revealed toxicity in 2.3% of the 128
elutriates; all had been identified by algae and Daphnia. Ten
elutriates were toxic only to Daphnia and 30 only to S. capri-
comutum. Fifty-one were toxic to both algae and Daphnia,
but Daphnia was most sensitive in only 8 elutriates. If one
test was used, 10 to 30 toxic elutriates would have not been
identified, depending on the test organism selected.
Specifications: Portions of this document are not fully legi-
ble. 456p.

Subject index keywords: Biological effects, Chemical com-
pounds, Superfund, Land pollution, Waste disposal.

1492 BioTrol Soli Washing System for Treatment of a
Wood Preserving Site: Applications Analysis Report

Order Number PB92-115245CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Paramus, NJ.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Mar 92
The report analyzes the results of the SITE Program demon-
stration of BioTrol's Soil Washing System at the MacGillis &
Gibbs wood treatment facility in New Brighton, MN. The con-
taminants of primary interest are pentachlorophenol (penta)
and polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). From tests
with two soils (130 mg/kg and 680 mg/kg penta), it is con-
cluded that the soil washer effectively segregates contami-

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION; Soil
Cleanup Technologies

nated soil into a large fraction of relatively uncontaminated
washed soil, a small fraction of fine clay and silt retaining
about 30% of the original penta contamination, contaminated
woody debris and contaminated process water, Biotreatment
of the process water from the two soil washing tests degrad-
ed 91-94% of the penta; removal of PAHs could not be de-
termined, White steady state was not achieved, the biological
treatment of the contaminated fines in a Slurry Bio-Reactor
suggested that >90% removal of penta and PAHs could be
achieved with a fully acclimated system. Combined operating
and capital costs for an integrated, full-scale system are esti-
mated to be 8168/ton of soil treated; incineration of the
woody debris is a major cost factor.

Specifications: See aiso PB92-115302 and PB92-150655.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 67p.

Subject index keywords: Wood preservatives. Soil treat-
ment, Waste management, Biological treatment, Soil wash-
ing, BioTrol soil washers.

1493 Characterization of Contaminated Soli from the
Montclalr/Glen Ridge, New Jersey, Superfund Sites

Order Number PB90-168063CDH, price: PC ACM/MP A01
Office of Radiation Programs, Washington, DC; Sep 89
The report describes the soil characterization phase conduct-
ed at the EPA Eastern Environmental Radiation Facility
(EERF) in Montgomery, Alabama. The identification of the
spatial distribution of the radium within the soil and its asso-
ciation with specific minerals or materials is shown to relate
to the later implementation phase. Procedures developed in
the investigation have application to other radioactively con-
taminated Superfund sites.

Specifications: 61 p.

Subject index keywords: Radioactive isotopes, Soil proper-
ties, Pollution.

1494 Characterization Protocol for Radioactive
Contaminated Soils

Order Number PB92-963354CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 92
The fact sheet presents the soil characterization process ap-
plicable in the Ri/FS stages of the Superfund process to
support the development of technologies for on-site volume
reduction of radioactive soils by physical separation technol-
ogies.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Pollution
control, Radioactive waste disposal, Superfund,

1495 Characterizing soils for hazardous waste site

Order Number DE91014097CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response.; Department of
Energy, Washington, DC; 1991

The purpose of this paper is to provide guidance to Remedial
Project Managers (RPM) and On-Scene Coordinators (OSC)
concerning soil characterization data types required for deci-
sion-making in the CERCLA RI/FS process related to risk
assessment and remedial alternative evaluation for contami-

nated soils. The information presented in this paper is a
compilation of current information from the literature and
from experience combined to meet the purpose of this
paper. This paper addresses two concerns related to soil
characterization for CERCLA remedial response. The first
concern is the applicability of traditional soil classification
methods to CERCLA soil characterization. The second is the
identification of soil characterization data types required for
CERCLA risk assessment and analysis of remedial alterna-
tives. These concerns are related, in that the Data Quality
Objective (DGO) process addresses both. The DQO process
was developed, in part, to assist CERCLA decision-makers in
identifying the data types, data quality, and data quantity re-
quired to support decisions that must be made during the Rl/
FS process. This process as it relates to CERCLA soil char-
acterization is discussed in the Data Quality Objective sec-
tion of this paper. 99 refs., 2 figs,, 4 tabs.

Specifications: Sponsored by Department of Energy, Wash-
ington, DC. 26p.

Subject index keywords: Remedial Action, Hazardous Ma-
terials, Remedial Project Managers, On-scene Coordinates,
Soil characterization, Waste management,

1496 Control of Aromatic Waste Air Streams by Soil
Bioreactors

Order Number PB92-144021CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Lab., Ada, OK.;
Oklahoma Univ., Norman. Environmental and Ground Water
Inst; C1991

Contamination of groundwater resources is a serious envi-
ronmental problem which is continuing to increase in occur-
rence in the United States. It has been reported that leaking
underground gasoline storage tanks may pose the most seri-
ous threat of all sources of groundwater contamination. Gas-
olines are comprised of a variety of aliphatic and aromatic
hydrocarbons. The aromatic portion consists primarily of ben-
zene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX com-
pounds). BTEX compounds are also among the most fre-
quency identified substances at Superfund sites. Pump and
treat well systems are the most common and frequently used
technique for aquifer restoration. Treatment is often in the
form of air stripping to remove the volatile components from
the contaminated water. Additionally, soil ventilation process-
es have been used to remove volatile components from the
vadose zone. Both air stripping and soil ventilation produce a
waste gas stream containing volatile compounds which is
normally treated by carbon adsorption or incineration. Both
treatment processes require a substantial capital investment
and continual operation and maintenance expenditures. The
objective of the study was to examine the potential of using
soil bioreactors to treat a waste gas stream produced by air
stripping or soil ventilation process. Previous studies have
shown that various hydrocarbons can be successfully treated
with soils. The study examined the removal of BTEX com-
pounds within soil columns and the influence of soil type,
inlet concentration, and inlet flow rate on the removal effi-
ciency.

Specifications: Pub. in Environmental Progress, v1Q n4
p300-306 Nov 91. Prepared in cooperation with Oklahoma
Univ., Norman. Environmental and Ground Water Inst. 9p.
Subject index keywords: Soil treatment, Land pollution
control, Water pollution control, Biodegradation, Aromatic
compounds.

290

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Soil

Cleanup Technologies

1497 Determining Soil Response Action Levels Based on
Potential Contaminant Migration to Ground Water: A
Compendium of Examples

Order Number PB90-183575CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Booz-Allsn and Hamilton, Inc., Washington, DC.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 89
The document presents case studies illustrating various
methods that have been used at Superfund sites to calculate
soil cleanup levels based on the potential for hazardous con-
stituents to migrate to and contaminate ground water. In ad-
dition, several methods for which case studies could not be
identified have been included in a separate section. The pur-
pose of the document is not to recommend specific meth-
ods; none of the methods or example analyses have been
verified over the long-term. The compendium should be
viewed as a resource which illustrates the importance of as-
sessing the impact of soil contaminants on ground water and
the effects various parameters have on contaminant migra-
tion through the unsaturated zone.

Specifications: Also available from Supt. of Docs. Spon-
sored by Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. 145p.

Subject index keywords: Ground water, Environmental
transport, Soils, Hazardous materials, Superfund, Cleanup.

1498 Development of Electro-Acoustic Soil
Decontamination (ESD) Process for In situ Applications

Order Number PB90-204728CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Battelle Columbus Labs., OH.; Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; Apr
90

The technical feasibility of electro-acoustic soil decontamina-
tion process through lab experiments demonstrated the re-
moval/concentration of heavy metals such as cadmium and
zinc. Results of the decane contaminated soils were, howev-
er, inconclusive. The ESD process is based on the applica-
tion of a d.c. electric field and acoustic field in the presence
of a conventional hydraulic gradient to contaminated soils to
enhance the transport of liquid and metal ions through the
soils. Electrodes (one or more anodes and a cathode) and
an acoustic source were placed in contaminated soils to
apply an electric field and an acoustic field to the soil. This
process works especially well with clay-type soils having
small pores or capillaries, where hydraulic permeability is
very low. The development program included a literature
review, soil characterization, design and construction of the
laboratory ESD unit, and lab scale experiments with soils
contaminated with decane, zinc and cadmium. Evaluation of
the experimental results indicated that application of the field
sources reduced the heavy metals zinc and cadmium more
than 90% in the treated cake. Tests yielded 10-20% decane
removal.

Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
141p.

Subject index keywords: Soils, Pollution control, Remedial
action, Heavy metals, Electroacoustic waves.

1499 Developments in Chemical Treatment of
Contaminated Soil

Order Number PB92-152933CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; 1992

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Re-
search and Development (ORD) is examining processes for
remedial action at Superfund sites, and corrective action at
operating disposal sites. Recent legislation emphasizes de-
struction and detoxification of contaminants, rather than con-
tainment or storage of contaminated soils. Chemical treat-
ment appears promising because it can destroy or greatly
change many contaminants. Oxidation, reduction, neutraliza-
tion, hydrolysis, dehalogenation, and UV/photoiysis are
chemical processes currently used for aboveground treat-
ment. Temperature and physical and chemical characteristics
of soil are some operating parameters that control the effec-
tiveness of these processes. Excalibur catalytic ozone tech-
nology, Exxon and Rio Linda cyanide destruction, and Trinity
ultrasonic detoxification are innovative technologies that
have been, or are currently being considered for pilot-scale
demonstrations.

Specifications: Presented at Panameriean Chemical Con-
gress (2nd), San Juan, Puerto Rica, September 24-29, 1991.
See aiso PB90-155607. 22p.

Subject index keywords: Soil treatment, Waste treatment,
Remedial action, Superfund, Chemical treatment.

1500 Distribution of DRAFT Soil Screening Level
Guidance

Order Number PB93-963508CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; 30 Sep 93
The memorandum transmits a second review draft of the Soil
Screening Levels Guidance to be used as a 'working draft' in
discussions with the Regions, States, and other stakeholders
as we refine and finalize the guidance by the summer of
1994. Only minor changes have been made to the August
19, 1993 draft for clarification with the exception of Table 1;
this table has been changed to reflect newly obtained chemi-
cal-specific information. The more significant technical and
policy issues raised during the August comment period will
be addressed in FY "94 through a series of technical analy-
ses, Regional pilot studies, and outreach efforts.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 17p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Soil contamination,
Hazardous materials.

1501 EPA Engineering Issue: Technology Alternatives for
the Remediation of PCB-Contaminated Soil and
Sediment

Order Number PB94-144250CDH, price; PC A03/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., McLean, VA,;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Oct 93

The document is Intended to familiarize On-scene Coordina-
tors (OSCs) and Remedial Project Managers (RPMs) with
issues important to the successful selection of technology al-
ternatives available for the remediation of soil and sediment
contaminated with PCBs at Superfund sites. The primary pur-

291

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Soil
Cleanup Technologies

pose of the report is to provide OSCs and RPMs with infor-
mation on established, demonstrated, and emerging technol-
ogy alternatives for remediating PCB-contaminated soil and
sediment. The secondary purpose is to provide basic infor-
mation on characteristics of PCBs, regulations governing
PCB remediation, sampling and data collection methods ap-
plicable to PCB contamination, analytical methods and tech-
nologies used to quantify PCB contamination, treatability
studies, and sources of further information.

Specifications: See also PB86-232774 and PB91-921206.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 27p.

Subject index keywords: Polychlorinated biphenyls, Soil
contamination, Remediation.

1502 EPA SITE Demonstration of the BioTrol Soil
Washing Process

Order Number PB92-150655CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab.; Science Applications
International Corp., Paramus, NJ; e1992
A pilot-scale soil washing process, patented by BioTrol, was
demonstrated on soil that was contaminated by wood treat-
ing waste. The BioTrol Soil Washing was demonstrated in a
treatment train sequence with two other pilot-scale units of
BioTrol technologies for treatment of waste streams from the
soil washer. The three technologies of the treatment train
were: The BioTrol Soil Washer (BSW), the BioTrol Aqueous
Treatment System (BATS), and the Slurry Bioreactor (SBR).
The BioTrol processes were evaluated on pentachlorophenol
(PCP) and polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), which
were the primary soil contaminants at the site. The sandy
site soii, consisting of less than 10% of fines, was well suited
for treatment by soil washing. The BSW successfully separat-
ed the feed soil (100% by weight) into 83% of washed soil,
10% of woody residues, and 7% of fines. The soil washer
achieved up to 89% removal of PCP and PAHs, based on
the difference between their levels in the feed soil and in the
washed soil. The BATS degraded up to 94% of PCP in the
process water from soil washing. The SBR achieved over
90% removals of PCP and 70-90% removals of PAHs, re-
spectively from the soil washing. Gost of a commercial-scale
soil washing, assuming use of all three technologies, was es-
timated to be $168 per ton of treated soil.

Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of Air and Waste Management
Association, v42 n1 p96-103 1991. See also PB91-182279
and PB91-228056. Prepared in cooperation with Science Ap-
plications International Corp., Paramus, NJ. 29p.

Subject index keywords: Biological industrial waste treat-
ment, Soils, Land pollution, Wood preservatives, BioTrol
aqueous treatment system, BioTrol soil washers, Slurry bio-
reactors, Superfund.

1503 Evaluation and Testing of a Protocol to Determine
the Aerobic Degradation Potential of Hazardous Waste
Constituents in Soil

Order Number PB91-233296CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab. Agricultural Research Service,
Beltsville, MD. Beltsville Agricultural Research Center; 1990
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in conjunc-
tion with the U.S. Department of Agriculture is currently test-
ing a protocol for determining the 'Aerobic Degradation Po-
tential of Hazardous Organic Constituents in Soil' to ensure

its reliability, accuracy, cost effectiveness, and ease of use.
This protocol is part of EPA's Office of Research and Devel-
opment efforts to provide Federal and State EPA offices as
well as consultants and industries with guidelines and en-
couragement for conducting standardized treatability studies.
Testing of the protocol has been initiated with standardized
soil (obtained from EPA's Synthetic Soil Matrix, Edison, NJ).
Two surrogate pollutants, toluene, a volatile, and phenol, a
semivolatile, are being tested as representative, easily biode-
gradable compounds. Critical aspects of the protocol involv-
ing the configuration of the test reactor and procedures for
trapping the volatiles have been identified. Once fine tuning
of the process is completed, testing of combinations of com-
pounds in a variety of soil matrices is planned.
Specifications: Presented at the Air and Waste Manage-
ment Association Annual Meeting and Exhibition (83rd) held
in Pittsburgh, PA. on June 24-29, 1990. Prepared in coopera-
tion with Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD. Belts-
ville Agricultural Research Center. 9p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Aerobic
processes, Biological treatment, Land pollution control,
Waste management, Biodeterioration,

1504 Evaluation of Alternative Treatment Technologies
for CERCLA Soils and Debris (Summary of Phase 1 and
Phase 2)

Order Number PB91-240572CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
PEl Associates, Inc., Cincinnati, OH.*, International
Technology Corp., Knoxville, TN.**Bruek, Hartman and
Esposito, Inc., Cincinnati, OH.'Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab;
Sep 91

The study was conducted in two phases. In the first phase, a
synthetic soil matrix was prepared as a theoretical composite
of Superfund soils nationwide. In the second phase, soils
from actual Superfund sites were treated. Three treatment
technologies were evaluated in both phases: (1) chemical
treatment (KPEG), (2) physical treatment (soils washing), and
(3) low-temperature thermal desorptlon. The Phase I study
also included the evaluation of incineration and stabilization.
Comparison of results obtained in the treatment of Superfund
soils and the synthetic soils reveals that the trend in con-
taminant removals was similar for both types of soils. The
percentage removal, however, was higher for synthetic soils
than for actual Superfund soils. This can be attributed to the
fact that the synthetic soils were spiked and tested without
allowing much time for sorption of the contaminant onto the
soils. In contrast, the actual Superfund soils had weathered
for long periods of time before treatment was attempted;
therefore, contaminant removal was shown to be more diffi-
cult on the actual soils.

Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with International
Technology Corp., Knoxville, TN., and Brack, Hartman and
Esposito, Inc., Cincinnati, OH. Sponsored by Environmental
Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineer-
ing Lab. 71p.

Subject index keywords: Soil treatment, Waste treatment,
Superfund, Remedial action.

292

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Soil

Cleanup Technologies

1505 Evaluation of Soil Venting Application. Ground
Water Issue

Order Number PB92-235605CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Apr 92
The Regional Superfund Ground-Water Forum is a group of
scientists, representing EPA's Regional Superfund Offices,
organized to exchange up-to-date information related to
ground-water remediation at Superfund sites. One of the
major issues of concern to the Forum is the transport and
fate of contaminants in soil and ground water as related to
subsurface remediation. The ability of soil venting to inexpen-
sively remove large amounts of volatile organic compounds
(VOCs) from contaminated soils is well established. Howev-
er, the time required using venting to remediate soils to low
contaminant levels often required by state and federal regu-
lators has not been adequately investigated. Discussion is
presented to aid in evaluating the feasibility of venting appli-
cation. Methods to optimize venting application are also dis-
cussed.

Specifications: 9 p.

Subject index keywords; Waste management, Superfund,
Hazardous materials, Water pollution control, (around water,
Soil venting, Innovative treatment technologies.

1506 Extraction and Recovery of Lead Species from Soil

Order Number PB93-150142CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; c1992

The remediation of lead contaminated soil at Superfund and
urban soil is a serious concern, given the grave effects of
lead exposure and the pervasive nature of the threat. The
lead species of interest are elemental lead, lead sulfate,
basic carbonate of lead and lead dioxide. These species
were solubilized in a three step process, using pure chemi-
cals and the total lead was recovered as lead sulfate. Bench
scale experiment were done using a soil that was dosed with
varying amounts of the contaminants (Total lead from 1,000
to 10,000 ppm.). Better than 80% of the contaminants was
recovered as lead sulfate, using the three step process. The
treated soil passed the TCLP test with 3.0 ppm of lead,
showing that it could be redeposited on site. A pilot plant
scale-up is being explored.

Specifications: Pub. in Environmental Progress, v11 n4
P256-26Q Nov 92. See also PB87-142378. 8p.

Subject index keywords: Soil treatment, Lead(Metal), Re-
medial action, Land pollution control, Lead inorganic com-
pounds.

1507 Ground-Water Issue: Soil sampling and analysis for
volatile organic compounds

Order Number DE91016758CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Monitoring Systems Lab., Las Vegas, NV; Feb
91

The Regional Superfund Ground Water Forum is a group of
ground-water scientists that represents EPA's Regional Su-
perfund Offices. The forum was organized to exchange up-
to-date information related to groundwater remediation at Su-
perfund sites. Sampling of soils for volatile organic com-
pounds (VOCs) is an issue identified by the Ground Water
Forum as a concern of Superfund decision makers. Con-
cerns over data quality have raised many questions related
to sampling soils for VOCs. This paper was prepared in re-
sponse to some of these questions and concerns expressed

by Remedial Project Managers (RPMs) and On-Scene Coor-
dinators (OSCs). 53 refs., 6 figs., 12 tabs.

Specifications: 34p.

Subject index keywords: Organic Compounds, Soils, US
EPA, Land pollution, Water pollution control, Remedial
action.

1508 Guide: Methods for Evaluating the Attainment of
Cleanup Standards for Soils and Solid Media

Order Number PB91-921365CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jul 91
The fact sheet highlights statistical concepts and methods
used in the evaluation of the attainment of cleanup stand-
ards. It provides an example of a basic procedure for deter-
mining sample size required to obtain a given confidence
level focusing on a cleanup standard specified as a mean
concentration with a specified confidence. It does not pro-
vide policy on specification of cleanup levels but should be
considered a technical reference guide for using some of the
more common methodologies.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Superfund.

1509 In situ Bioremediation of Contaminated Unsaturated
Subsurface Soils

Order Number PB93-234565CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Utah State Univ., Logan.; Robert S. Kerr Environmental
Research Lab., Ada, OK; May 93

An emerging technology for the remediation of unsaturated
subsurface soils involves the use of microorganisms to de-
grade contaminants which are present in such soils. Under-
standing the processes which drive in situ bioremediation, as
well as the effectiveness and efficiency of the utilization of
these systems, are issues which have been identified by the
Regional Superfund Engineering Forum as concerns of Su-
perfund decision makers. Although in situ bioremediation has
been used for a number of years in the restoration of ground
water contaminated by petroleum hydrocarbons, it has only
been in recent years that in situ systems have been directed
toward contaminants in unsaturated subsurface soils. Re-
search has contributed greatly to understanding the biotic,
chemical, and hydrologic parameters which contribute to or
restrict the application of in-situ bioremediation and has been
successful at a number of locations in demonstrating its ef-
fectiveness at field scale.

Specifications: Sponsored by Robert S. Kerr Environmental
Research Lab., Ada, OK. I8p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Soil chemistry, Micro-
organisms control(Water), Water pollution control, Bioreme-
diation.

1510 In situ Soil Flushing. Engineering Bulletin

Order Number PB92-180025CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Oct 91
In situ soil flushing is the extraction of contaminants from the
soil with water or other suitable aqueous solutions. Soil flush-
ing is accomplished by passing the extraction fluid through

293

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION; Soil
Cleanup Technologies

in-place soils using an injection or infiltration process. Extrac-
tion fluids must be recovered and, when possible, are recy-
cled. The method is potentially applicable to all types of soil
contaminants. Soil flushing enables removal of contaminants
from the soil and is most effective in permeable soils. An ef-
fective collection system is required to prevent migration of
contaminants and potentially toxic extraction fluids to uncon-
taminated areas of the aquifer. Soil flushing, in conjunction
with in situ bioremediation, may be a cost-effective means of
soil remediation at certain sites. Typically, soil flushing is
used in conjunction with other treatments that destroy con-
taminants or remove them from the extraction fluid and
groundwater.

Specifications: See also PB87-146007, PB90-155607, and
PB90-274093. 10p.

Subject Index keywords: In-situ processing, Soil treatment,
Land pollution control, Waste management, Hazardous mate-
rials, Soil flushing.

1511 In situ Soil Vapor Extraction Treatment

Order Number PB91-228072CDH, price: PC AQ3/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.; FW
Energy Applications, Inc., Livingston, NJ.'Environmental
Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency
and Remedial Response; May 91

Soil vapor extraction (SVE) is designed to physically remove
volatile compounds, generally from the vadose or unsaturat-
ed zone. It is an in situ process employing vapor extraction
wells alone or in combination with air injection wells. Vacuum
blowers supply the motive force, inducing air flow through
the soil matrix. The air strips the volatile compounds from the
soil and carries them to the screened extraction well. Air
emissions from the systems are typically controlled by ad-
sorption of the volatiles onto activated carbon, thermal de-
struction (incineration or catalytic oxidation), or condensation
by refrigeration. SVE is a developed technology that has
been used in commercial operations for several years. The
final determination of the lowest cost alternative will be more
site-specific than process equipment dominated. The bulletin
provides information on the technology applicability, the limi-
tations of the technology, the technology description, the
types of residuals produced, site requirements, the latest per-
formance data, the status of the technology, and sources for
further information.

Specifications; Prepared in cooperation with FW Energy
Applications, Inc., Livingston, NJ. Sponsored by Environmen-
tal Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency
and Remedial Response. 12p.

Subject index keywords: Soil treatment, Hazardous materi-
als, Air flow, Extraction, In-situ processing, Soil vapor extrac-
tion.

1512 In situ Steam Extraction Treatment

Order Number PB91-228064CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; May 91
In situ steam extraction removes volatile and semivolatile
hazardous contaminants from soil and groundwater without
excavation of the hazardous waste. Waste constituents are
removed in situ by the technology and are not actually treat-
ed. The use of steam enhances the stripping of volatile con-
taminants from soil and can be used to displace contaminat-
ed groundwater under some conditions. The resultant con-

densed liquid contaminants can be recycled or treated prior
to disposal. The steam extraction process is applicable to or-
ganic wastes but has not been used for removing insoluble
inorganics and metals. Steam is injected into the ground to
raise the soil temperature and drive off volatile contaminants.
Alternatively, steam can be injected to form a displacement
front by steam condensation to displace groundwater. The
contaminated liquid and steam condensate are then collect-
ed for further treatment. Two types of systems are discussed
in the document: the mobile system and the stationary
system. The bulletin provides information on the technology
applicability, limitations, a description of the technology,
types of residuals produced, site requirements, the latest per-
formance data, the status of the technology, and sources for
further information.

Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response. 9p,

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, In-situ proc-
essing, Water pollution control, Ground water, Soil treatment,
Extraction.

1513 Innovative Technology: Giycolate Dehalogenation

Order Number PB90-274226CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 89
The fact sheet provides technology description, site charac-
teristics affecting treatment feasibility, technology consider-
ations, and technology status for Giycolate Dehalogenation.
The sheet describes the process as being potentially effec-
tive in detoxifying specific types of aromatic organic contami-
nants, particularly dioxins and PCBs.

Specifications: 5p.

Subject index keywords; Hazardous materials, Superfund,
Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Dehalogenation, Glycolic acid.

1514 Innovative Technology: In-situ Vitrification

Order Number PB90-274192CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 89
The fact sheet provides technology description, site charac-
teristics affecting treatment feasibility, technology consider-
ations, and technology status for In-Situ Vitrification (ISV),
The sheet describes how ISV can be used to treat soils and
sludges contaminated with mixtures of various waste types
(e.g. radioactive, inorganic and/or organic).

Specifications: 5p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Vitrification,
Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, In-situ processing.

1515 Innovative Technology. Soil Washing

Order Number PB90-274184CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Nov 89
The fact sheet provides technology description, site charac-
teristics affecting treatment feasibility, technology consider-
ations, and technology status for soil washing. The fact
sheet describes how soil washing can be potentially benefi-
cial in the separation/segregation and volumetric reduction
of hazardous materials in solids, sludges, and sediments.
Specifications: 5p.

294

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Soil

Cleanup Technologies

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Decontami-
nation, Superfund, Waste management, Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response, Soil treatment.

1516 Interim Guidance on Establishing Soil Lead Cleanup
Levels at Superfund Sites. Supplement to Interim
Guidance on Establishing Soil Lead Cleanup Levels at
Superfund Sites

Order Number PB91-921352CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; 1990
The purpose of the directive (9355.4-02) is to set forth an in-
terim soil cleanup level for total lead, at 500 to 1000 ppm,
which the Office of Emergency and Remedial Response and
the Office of Waste Programs Enforcement consider protec-
tive for direct contact at residential settings. This range is to
be used at both Fund-lead and Enforcement-lead CERCLA
sites. Further guidance will be developed after the Agency
has developed a verified Cancer Potency Factor and/or a
Reference Dose for lead. The purpose of the directive
(9355.4-02A) is to reiterate that OSWER Directive 9355.4-02
is a guidance document and not a regulation. As is the case
with other guidance documents, the guidance should not be
used as a regulation.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Public health, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response.

1517 International Evaluation of In-situ Biorestoratlon of
Contaminated Soil and Groundwater (September 1990)

Order Number PB93-207553CDH, price; PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
The philosophy of in-situ biorestoration is to stimulate the in-
digenous soil microorganisms to degrade contaminants by
improving the environmental conditions in the soil using a
water recirculation system. The objective of the project is to
show the possibilities for application of the technique in rela-
tion with contaminants, soil conditions and other site-specific
circumstances by means of integration and evaluation of re-
sults of in-situ biorestoration projects. The project is limited
to the Netherlands, West Germany and the USA. Experience
has especially been gained with in-situ biorestoration at hy-
drocarbon-contaminated petrol stations and industrial sites.
The system generally consists of a water recirculation
system, aboveground water treatment and conditioning of
the infiltrating water with nutrients and an oxygen source.
However, there is no one-and-only application method for in-
situ biorestoration. The remediation, which can last from ap-
proximately six months to several years, can reach residual
concentrations below the B-value of the Netherlands exami-
nation framework.

Specifications: Pub. in Proceedings of NATO/CCMS Inter-
national Conference, Demonstration of Remedial Action
Technologies for Contaminated Land and Groundwater (3rd),
Montreal, Canada, November 6-9, 1989. See also PB91-
143198. 3Gp.

Subject index keywords: Remedial action, Soil contamina-
tion, Water pollution control, Ground water, Foreign technolo-
gy.

1518 Literature Review Summary of Metals Extraction
Processes Used to Remove Lead from Soils

Order Number PB94-140613CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
IT Corp., Cincinnati, OH.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; Jan 94
Numerous Superfund sites throughout the United States are
contaminated with toxic metals. Battery reclamation, lead
smelting, and lead-based paint manufacturing are examples
of processes that could result in lead-contaminated soils.
Metals, unlike many hazardous organic constituents, cannot
be degraded or readily detoxified. This report presents infor-
mation on metals extraction technologies that are currently in
various stages of development, soil characteristics that affect
metals extraction, chelating agents used in the soil washing
of lead-contaminated soils, and membranes used to separate
metal cations. The information presented in this report was
obtained from a literature search conducted to investigate
metals extraction processes for removing lead from soils.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
62p.

Subject index keywords: Soil treatment, Land pollution
control, Lead (Metal), Extraction, Remedial action.

1519 On-Site Engineering Report for the Low-
Temperature Thermal Desorption Pilot-Scale Test on
Contaminated Soil

Order Number PB92-21B936CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
IT Environmental Programs, Inc., Cincinnati, OH.; IT Corp.,
Knoxville, TN.*Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; Jul 92
Performance of the thermal desorption process for removal
of organic contaminants, mostly polynuclear aromatic hydro-
carbons (PAHs), from soils was evaluated. The Superfund
Site soii tested was a fine sandy soil contaminated with creo-
sote. An optimum operating temperature of 550 C and an op-
timum operating residence time of 10 min, determined from
bench studies, were used in the pilot-scale desorber. Con-
taminants removed from the soil were captured or destroyed
in the associated air pollution control equipment. Test results
showed that greater than 99% of the PAHs were removed
from the soil. The concentration of total PAHs averaged
4629 mg/Kg in the pretreated soils and were below detec-
tion in the posttreated soils.

Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with IT Corp.,
Knoxville, TN. Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
134p.

Subject Index keywords: Soil treatment, Land pollution
control, Thermal degradation, Desorption.

1520 On-Site Engineering Report of the Slurry-Phase
Biological Reactor for Pilot-Scale Testing on
Contaminated Soil

Order Number PB93-178259CDH, price: PC A09/MF A02
IT Environmental Programs, Inc., Cincinnati, OH.; ECOVA
Corp., Redmond, WA.*Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; Apr 93
A pilot-scale test of the slurry-phase bioremediation technol-
ogy was performed by ECOVA Corporation (ECOVA) at the
U.S. EPA Test and Evaluation (T&E) facility from May 8
through July 10, 1991 (12 weeks). The slurry-phase bioreac-
tors were tested on a creosote-contaminated soil from the

295

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Soil
Cleanup Technologies

Burlington Northern Superfund Site in Brainerd, Minnesota.
The results of the bench-scale study (performed by ECOVA
prior to the pilot-scale study) were used to optimize a pilot-
scale bioreactor system containing 64 liters of 30 percent
slurry (soil:water, w/v). The pilot-scale phase utilized an ino-
culum of indigenous polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)
degraders (9.3 x 10 to the 7th power per gram of soil), an
inorganic nitrogen supplement in the form of NH(4-)N, and a
media broth containing potassium, phosphate, magnesium,
calcium, and iron to achieve an overall reduction. During the
study, levels of soil-bound and liquid-phase PAHs, total pe-
troleum hydrocarbons (TPHs), nutrients, pH, dissolved
oxygen, temperature, toxicity, and microbial activity were
monitored.

Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with ECOVA Corp.,
Redmond, WA. Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
185p.

Subject Index keywords: Creosote, Soils, Bioreactors, Slur-
ries.

1S21 On-Site Methods for Assessing Chemical Impact on
the Soil Environment Using Earthworms: A Case Study
at the Baird and McGuire Superfund Site, Holbrook,
Massachusetts

Order Number PB92-108166CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Corvallis Environmental Research Lab., OR.; Menzie-Cura
and Associates, Inc., Chelmsford, MA. NSI Technology
Services Corp., Corvallis, OR. Environmental Research Lab;
C1991

Five Lumbricus terrestris Linneaus were placed into enclo-
sures at a field site and evaluated after 7 d. The enclosures
were distributed in transects throughout areas of high and
low contamination and in a reference area. Observations of
earthworm responses for mortality, morbidity (coiling, stiffen-
ing, swelling, lesions) and whole body burden were com-
pared to chemical measurements in corresponding soil sam-
ples. Nine chemicals (DDT, DDE, DDD alpha chlordane,
gamma-chlordane, chlordene, gamma-chlordene, endrin,
nonachlor) were measured in the whole body of earthworms
and soil samples. Various levels of impact were described by
scoring earthworm responses from sampling locations
throughout the field site. A ranking of the sample locations
from low to high impact by the earthworm response variables
is directly correlated to the ranking of these locations for
concentrations of total chlordane and total DDT in corre-
sponding soil samples. Results show acute toxicity to earth-
worms placed on-site and suggest that whole body concen-
trations could impact earthworm predators. In addition, the
on-site method eliminates the need to transport soils to off-
site laboratories, thus preventing subsequent disposal issues.
(Copyright (c) 1991 SETAC.)

Specifications: Pub. in Environmental Toxicology and
Chemistry, vio p817-826 1991. Prepared in cooperation with
Menzie-Cura and Associates, Inc., Chelmsford, MA., and NSI
Technology Services Corp., Corvallis, OR. Environmental Re-
search Lab. 12p.

Subject index keywords: Land pollution, Biological indica-
tors, Pesticides, Environmental impact assessments, Anne-
lids, Chemical compounds.

1522 Pilot-Scale Incineration of Comtaminated Soils from
the Drake Chemical Superfund Site

Order Number PB93-163004CDH, price: PC A12/MF A03
Acurex Corp., Jefferson, AR, Incineration Research Facility.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Mar 93
A series of pilot-scale incineration tests were performed at
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) Inciner-
ation Research Facility to evaluate the potential of inciner-
ation as an option to treat contaminated soils from the Drake
Chemical Superfund site in Lock Haven, Pennsylvania. The
soils at the Drake site are reported to be contaminated to
varying degrees with various organic constituents and sever-
al hazardous constituent trace metals. The purpose of the
test program was to evaluate the incinerability of selected
site soi/s in terms of the destruction of contaminant organic
constituents and the fate of contaminant trace metals. All
tests were conducted in the rotary kiln incineration system at
the IRF. Test results show that greater than 99.995 percent
principal organic hazardous constituent (POHC) destruction
and removal efficiencies (DRE) can be achieved at kiln exit
gas temperatures of nominally 816 C (1,500 F) and 538 C
(1,000 F), Complete soil decontamination of semivolatile or-
ganics was achieved; however, kiln ash levels of three vola-
tile organic constituents remained comparable to soil levels.
Specifications: See also PB91-186965. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 272p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Incinerators, Land pol-
lution control, Soil treatment, Hazardous materials, Waste
disposal.

1523 Pilot-Scale Incineration of Contaminated Soil from
the Chemical Insecticide Corporation Superfund Site

Order Number PB93-155968CDH, price: PC A09/MF A02
Acurex Corp., Jefferson, AR.; Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab;
Feb 93

An incineration test program was conducted at the U.S. Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency's Incinerator Research Facility
to evaluate the potential of incineration as an option to treat
contaminated soils at the Chemical Insecticide Corporation
Site. The test data show that: The organochlonne pesticides
were destroyed to non-detectable quantities in the ash, the
state-of-the-art scrubber removed arsenic to the 99.95%
level, lime addition did not improve the arsenic removal effi-
ciency, toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP)
values for ash metals varied, lime addition reduced TCLP
teachability of metals, particulate and HCI levels were within
accepted limits. Incineration data that can be used for other
purposes was also collected for the soil tested.
Specifications: See also PB92-193382. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 192p.

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Soil treatment, Inciner-
ation, Air pollution control, Insecticides, Metals.

296

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Soil

Cleanup Technologies

1524 Presentations EPA-State Soil Standards Conference.
Held in Crystal City, Virginia on January 29,1991

Order Number PB92-963350CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jan 92
The first U.S. EPA-sponsored national conference on estab-
lishing soil cleanup criteria that would be protective of
ground-water quality was held on January 29, 1991. Included
in the publication are questions and answers from panel dis-
cussions, as well as text from the presentations.
Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required (minimum deposit $200 U.S., Canada,
and Mexico; all others $400). Single copies also available in
paper copy or microfiche. 162p.

Subject Index keywords: Soils, Water pollution standards,
Ground water, Hazardous materials, Meetings, Superfund,
Cleanup.

1525 Prospects for In situ Chemical Treatment for
Contaminated Soil

Order Number PB92-126929CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Dec 91

Treating large volumes of contaminated soil at Superfund
sites is costly. These factors have led the U.S. EPA's Super-
fund Program to consider in situ chemical treatment as an al-
ternative technology for treatment of contaminated soil. Oxi-
dation, reduction, neutralization, hydrolysis, dehalogenation,
and UV/photolysis are chemical processes currently used for
above-ground treatment. Temperature, physical and chemical
characteristics of soil, are some operating parameters that
control the effectiveness of these processes. Improvements
in mixing treatment materials in soil, and methods for recov-
ering unreacted material reaction products, are needed to
allow wider application of these treatments in situ. Excalibur
catalytic ozone technology, Exxon and Rio Linda cyanide de-
struction, and Trinity ultrasonic detoxification are innovative
technologies that are being considered.

Specifications: See also PB87-146007. Presented at
HMCRI's Annual National Conference and Exhibition (12th),
Washington, DC., December 3-5, 1991. 9p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Soil proper-
ties, Waste treatment, In situ treatment, Superfund.

1526 Rationale for the Assessment of Errors in the
Sampling of Soils

Order Number PB90-242306CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Monitoring Systems Lab., Las Vegas, NV.;
Nevada Univ., Las Vegas. Environmental Research Center;
Jul 90

The sampling of soils in RCRA and Superfund monitoring
programs requires associated quality assurance programs.
One objective of any quality assurance program is to assess
and document the quality of the study data to ensure that it
satisfies the needs of the users. The purpose of the docu-
ment is to describe the nature and function of certain quality
assurance samples in the assessment and documentation of
bias and precision in sampling studies of Inorganic pollutant
concentrations in soils. The document has been developed
to provide people who plan, implement, or oversee RCRA or
Superfund soil sampling studies with information on quality
assessment samples so that they will have a better basis for
decisions concerning the employment of such samples in
their quality assurance programs.

Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Nevada Univ.,
Las Vegas. Environmental Research Center. 66p.

Subject Index keywords: Soils, Sampling, Quality assur-
ance.

1527 Reductive Dehalogenation of Organic Contaminants
in Soils and Ground Water, Ground Water Issue

Order Number PB91-191056CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01

Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Lab., Ada, OK; Jan
91

Introduction and large scale production of synthetic haloge-
nated organic chemicals over the last 50 years has resulted
in a group of contaminants which tend to persist in the envi-
ronment and resist both biotic and abiotic degradation. The
low solubility of these types of contaminants, along with their
toxicity and tendency to accumulate in food chains, make
them particularly relevant targets for remediation activities.
Although the processes involved in dechlorination of many of
these organic compounds are well understood in the fields of
chemistry and microbiology, technological applications of
these processes to environmental remediation are relatively
new-particularly at pilot or field scale. It is well established,
however, that there are several mechanisms which result in
dehalogenation of some classes of organic contaminants,
often rendering them less offensive environmentally. These
include; stimulation of metabolic sequences through introduc-
tion of electron donor and acceptor combinations; addition of
nutrients to meet the needs of dehalogenating microorga-
nisms; possible use of engineered micro-organisms; and use
of enzyme systems capable of catalyzing reductive dehalo-
genation.

Specifications: 15p.

Subject Index keywords: Land pollution control, Water pol-
lution control, Remedial action, Superfund, Waste disposal,
Dehalogenation.

1528 Regional Guide: Issuing Site-Specific Treatability
Variances for Contaminated Soils and Debris from Land
Disposal Restrictions (LDRs)

Order Number PB92-963284CDH, price: PC A01/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Solid Waste and Emergency Response; Jan 92
The fact sheet highlights the delegation of land disposal re-
strictions (LDR) site-specific treatability variances to regional
offices by describing both the procedures and requirements
for issuance.

Subject Index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response.

1529 Remediation of Contaminated Soils by Solvent
Flushing

Order Number PB94-162740CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Florida Univ., Gainesville, Dept. of Soil and Water Science.;
Robert S. Kerr Environmental Research Lab., Ada,
OK.'Electric Power Research Inst., Palo Alto, CA; c1994
Solvent flushing is a potential technique for remediating a
waste disposal/spill site contaminated with organic chemi-
cals. This technique involves the injection of a solvent mix-

297

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION; Soil
Cleanup Technologies

ture (e.g., water plus alcohols) that enhances contaminant
solubility, reduces the retardation factor, and increases the
release rates of the contaminants. A simulation model is de-
veloped to predict contaminant elution curves during solvent
flushing for the case of one-dimensional, steady flow through
a contaminated medium. Column experiments are conducted
with a Eustis fine sand that is initially equilibrated with an
aqueous naphthalene solution, and then clutcd with different
methanol-water mixtures to remove the naphthalene. The
model simulations, based on parameter values estimated
from literature data agree well with the measured elution pro-
files. Solvent flushing experiments, where the soil was initially
equilibrated with a solution of naphthalene and anthracene,
show that compounds with different retardation factors are
separated at low cosolvent contents, while coelution of the
compounds occurs at higher contents. (Copyright (c) ASCE
1994.)

Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of Environmental Engineering,
v12Q n1 p42-57 Jan/Feb 94. See also PB92-180025 and
PB92-180074. Sponsored by Robert S. Kerr Environmental
Research Lab., Ada, OK. and Electric Power Research Inst.,
Palo Alto, CA. 18p.

Subject index keywords: Waste disposal, Volatile organic
compounds, Ground water, Water pollution control, Super-
fund.

1530 Removal of Creosote from Soil by Thermal
Desorption

Order Number P392-126838CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
International Technology Corp., Knoxville, TN,; Environmental
Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab; 1991

Performance of the thermal desorption process for removal
of organic contaminants, mostly polynuclear aromatic hydro-
carbons (PAHs), from soils was evaluated. A Superfund Site
Soil that was contaminated with creosote was tested. An op-
erating temperature of 550 C and an operating residence
time of 10 minutes at temperature, determined from bench
studies, were used in the pilot scale desorber. Test results
showed that greater than 99% of the PAHs were removed
from the test soil. The concentrations of total PAHs in the
soil before and after treatment averaged 4629 mg/kg and
below detection limits respectively.

Specifications: See also PB91-228080. Proceedings of
HMCRi's Annual National Conference and Exhibition (12th).
Washington, DC., December 3-5, 1991, p362-368. Sponsored
by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab. 9p.

Subject index keywords: Soil treatment, Hazardous materi-
als, Creosote, Thermal environments, Desorption.

1531 Removal of Radionuclides by Electrokinetic Soil
Processing

Order Number PB93-222875CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; c1993

Electrokinetics promises to be an innovative treatment proc-
ess for in-situ treatment of soils and groundwater contami-
nated with heavy metals and radionuclides. Electrokinetics
refers to the movement of ionic liquids and charged particles
relative to one another under the action of an applied direct
current electric field. The paper summarizes the results of
laboratory tests for the removal of uranium, thorium, and

radium, conducted from February 28, 1991 to March 30,
1991 and a review of progress to date.

Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of the National Technical Asso-
ciation, v66 n2 p43-46 Spring 1993. Bp.

Subject index keywords: Radioactive materials, Electrokin-
etics, Soil contamination.

1532 Soil Washing Treatment

Order Number PB91-228056CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 80
Soil washing is a water-based process for mechanically
scrubbing soils ex-situ to remove undesirable contaminants.
The process removes contaminants from soils in one of two
ways: by dissolving or suspending them in the wash solution
(which is later treated by conventional wastewater treatment
methods) or by concentrating them into a smaller volume of
soil through simple particle size separation techniques (simi-
lar to those used in sand and gravel operations). Soil wash-
ing systems incorporating both removal techniques offer the
greatest promise for application to soils contaminated with a
wide variety of heavy metal and organic contaminants. The
concept of reducing soil contamination through the use of
particle size separation is based on the finding that most or-
ganic and inorganic contaminants tend to bind, either chemi-
cally or physically, to clay and silt soil particles. At the
present time, soil washing is used extensively in Europe and
has had limited use in the United States. During 1986-1989,
the technology was one of the selected source control reme-
dies at eight Superfund sites. The bulletin provides informa-
tion on the technology applicability, the types of residuals re-
sulting from the use of the technology, the latest perform-
ance data, site requirements, the status of the technology,
and where to go for further information.

Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response. 13p.

Subject index keywords: Soil treatment, Washing, Waste
management, Soil washing.

1533 Summary of Treatment Technology Effectiveness
for Contaminated Soil

Order Number PB92-963351CDH, price: PC A23/MF A04
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Jun 90
The document presents the results of a study conducted by
the Office of Emergency and Remedial Response that col-
lected soil treatment data and analyzed the effectiveness of
treatment technologies on contaminant treatability groups.
The document presents the recommendations developed for
the treatment of contaminated soil.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Soils, Waste
treatment, Superfund, Remedial response.

298

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Soil

Cleanup Technologies

1534 Superfund Engineering Issue: Considerations for
Evaluating the Impact of Metals Partitioning during the
Incineration of Contaminated Soils from Superfund Sites

Order Number PB93-121341CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 92
A significant amount of research has been conducted on the
incineration of contaminated materials. Although historically
the primary focus has been on the destruction of organics,
increased emphasis is being placed in the fate of metals.
Unlike the organic portion, the metal fraction may change
form but is not destroyed. Metals can remain with the ash
when discharged from the primary combustion chamber.
They can also volatilize or oxidize to form fumes or fine par-
ticulates and pass through the incineration system. Metal
vapors, fumes, or particles can be collected by the APCDs,
exit out the stack, or be deposited along the walls of the
combustion chamber and remain in the incineration system.
Potentia! pathways for metals are illustrated. This distribution
of metals into the various incinerator system components is
called 'partitioning.' A number of factors affect how various
metals will partition, or behave, during incineration.
Specifications: See also PB89-233423, PB90-132812 and
PB90-186339. Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
17p,

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Incinerators, Metals,
Soil treatment, Waste management, Metal partitioning.

1535 Superfund Engineering Issue: Treatment of Lead-
Contaminated Soils

Order Number PB91-921291CDH, price: PC AQ3/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Apr 91
The bulletin summarizes the contents of a seminar on treat-
ment of lead-contaminated soils presented on Aug. 28, 1990,
to Region V Superfund and RCRA personnel by members of
EPA's Engineering and Treatment Technology Support
Center located in the Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory
(RREL) in Cincinnati, Ohio. The bulletin is intended to sum-
marize the information presented during the seminar and it
should not be viewed as a definitive treatise on lead treat-
ment technologies.

Subject index keywords: Lead(Metal), Hazardous materials,
Waste treatment, Meetings, Superfund.

1536 Superfund Soils Data Management System

Order Number PB92-139476CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
CDM Federal Programs Corp., Fairfax, VA.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab; 1992

The paper describes the Superfund Soil Data Management
System (DMS), a PC-based data system being developed by
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in its effort
to manage and evaluate treatment and performance data for
contaminated soil, sludge, and debris. The system will be
used to support two basic EPA objectives: (1) technology
transfer; and (2) support for the development of RCRA land
disposal restrictions (LDRs) for contaminated soil and debris.

CDM Federal Programs Corporation is supporting EPA in the
development of this data base, EPA is compiling and evalu-
ating soil, sludge, and debris treatment date from a variety of
sources such as: EPA Superfund remedial and removal ac-
tions, RCRA and UST corrective actions, SITE program dem-
onstrations, and other research programs; Department of
Energy (DOE); Department of Defense (DOD); treatment ven-
dors; private contractors; and research organizations. This
influx of data has created the information management need
addressed by the Superfund Soil DMS. Written in dBASE
III— (a popular PC-based data base language), the Super-
fund Soil DMS stores: Quantitative and qualitative data on
ex-situ soil, sludge, and debris treatment technologies, Qual-
ity control (QC) data (such as blank, spike recoveries, surro-
gate recoveries, etc.), Bibliographic and site information, and
Abstracts arid extensive comments regarding treatment per-
formance, successes and problems, design and operating in-
formation, and recommendations for additional research.

Specifications: Presented at HMCRI Annua! National Con-
ference and Exhibition (12th), Washington, DC., December 3-
5, 1991. Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 7p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Data base management, Information systems, Superfund
Soils Data Management System.

1537 Technical Background Document for Draft Soil
Screening Level Guidance

Order Number PB94-963503CDH, price; Standing Order, call
for price

Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Mar 94
The document provides technical details of the derivation of
the September 30, 1993, draft Soil Screening Levels (SSLs)
Guidance for Superfund (PB93-963508). The document is
presented in two sections. Section I defines SSL and pro-
vides background information on the development of SSLs
and their application and implementation at Superfund sites,
including sampling schemes for measuring SSL attainment. It
also provides draft SSLs developed for 30 chemicals. Sec-
tion ll provides the technical basis for the development of
SSLs addressing direct ingestion of soil, inhalation of vola-
tiles and fugitive dust, and the soil-to-ground-water exposure
pathway, including the assumptions and theories used the
their development.

Specifications: Paper copy available on Standing Order, de-
posit account required ($100 U.S., Canada, and Mexico; all
others $200). Single copies also available in paper copy or
microfiche. 324p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Soil contamination.

1538 Technology Demonstration Summary: Bio Trol Soil
Washing System for Treatment of a Wood Preserving
Site

Order Number P892-224393CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Mar 92

The Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Pro-
gram was instituted in 1988 to promote the development and
application of innovative technologies to the remediation of
Superfund and other sites contaminated with hazardous
wastes. The Project Summary highlights the results of an

299

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Soil

Cleanup Technologies

evaluation of a specific arrangement of the three technol-
ogies of the BSWS. The system consists of multiple stages
of physical abrasion, attrition, flotation, and washing of exca-
vated soil in the BSW. The site selected for the evaluation is
a wood preserving facility in New Brighton, MN, where creo-
sote and pentachlorophenol were used for several decades.
Specifications: See also PB92-115245, 7p.

Subject index keywords; Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Remedial action, Soil treatment, Waste management, BioTrol
soil washing system.

1539 Technology Evaluation Report; Biotrol Soil Washing
System for Treatment of a Wood Preserving Site.

Volume 1

Order Number PB92-115310CDH, price: PC A13/MF A03
Science Applications International Corp., McLean, VA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Dec 91

The report presents and evaluates the extensive database
from the SITE Program demonstration at the MacGillis and
Gibbs wood treatment facility in New Brighton, MN. Soil
washing and segregation, biotreatment of contaminated proc-
ess water, and biodegradation of a slurry of the contaminat-
ed fines from the soil washing were evaluated over several
weeks of operation. The contaminants of concern were pen-
tachlorophenol (penta) and polynuclear aromatic hydrocar-
bons (PAHs). The results indicate that the soil washer effec-
tively segregates contaminated soil into coarse, relatively un-
contaminated sand constituting the largest output fraction
and a much smaller fraction of fine clay/silt particles retain-
ing about 30% of the original contamination. Penta removal
efficiency from the feed soil is 87%-89% (vendor's claim:
90%). Contaminated woody material is also segregated.
Operational variations and their impact on output qualities
and quantities are described. Biotreatment of process water
from the soil washing successfully degraded 91-94% of the
penta. The results for the slurry biological treatment of the
contaminated fines indicated that >90% removal of penta
and PAHs probably can be achieved with a fully acclimated
system operating at steady state. Combined operating and
capital equipment cost for an integrated system are estimat-
ed to be $168/ton of soil treated. Incineration of the woody
debris is a major cost factor. Costs are also presented by
process since specific applications may require different con-
figurations of the three units.

Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports, PC E99/
MF E99, PB92-115302. See also Volume 2, Part A, PB92-
115328. Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 276p.
Subject index keywords; Soil treatment, Land pollution
control, Waste management, Wood preservatives, Biological
treatment, Superfund, Soil washing, BioTrol soil washing
system.

1540 Technology Evaluation Report: Biotrol Soil Washing
System for Treatment of a Wood Preserving Site.

Volume 2, Part A

Order Number PB92-115328CDH, price: PC A17/MF A04
Science Applications International Corp., McLean, VA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Dec 91

The SITE Program demonstration of one configuration of the
BioTrol Soil Washing System (BSWS) was conducted to
obtain reliable performance and cost data that can be used

to evaluate the potential applicability of the technology as a
remediation alternative for sites contaminated with hazardous
wastes. The BSWS treatment train used in the study consists
of three technologies: a soil washer; an aqueous treatment
system; and a slurry bio-reactor. The demonstration was car-
ried out at the MacGillis and Gibbs Superfund site in New
Brighton, MN. The report analyzes the results from the SITE
demonstration. It includes discussion of the operation of the
three separate treatment technologies (SW, SBR, and BATS)
evaluated in the test and provides flow diagrams, a summary
of the sampling and analytical programs, an economic analy-
sis, and a quality assurance/quality control evaluation of the
data. The volume, consisting of several appendices, presents
key analytical data and the quality control and quality assur-
ance studies that were carried out as part of the demonstra-
tion evaluation. Additional supporting data is archieved in
EPA's Edison, New Jersey laboratory.

Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB92-115302. See also Volume 1, PB92-115310
and Volume 2, Part B, PB92-115336. Sponsored by Environ-
mental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 387p.

Subject index keywords: Soil treatment, Land pollution
control, Waste management, Wood preservatives, Biological
treatment, Superfund, Soil washing, BioTrol soil washing
system.

1541 Technology Evaluation Report Biotrol Soil Washing
System for Treatment of a Wood Preserving Site.

Volume 2, Part B

Order Number PB92-115336CDH, price: PC A15/MF A03
Science Applications International Corp., McLean, VA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Dec 91

The SITE Program demonstration of one configuration of the
BioTrol Soil Washing System (BSWS) was conducted to
obtain reliable performance and cost data that can be used
to evaluate the potential applicability of the technology as a
remediation alternative for sites contaminated with hazardous
wastes. The BSWS treatment train used in the study consists
of three technologies: a soil washer; an aqueous treatment
system; and a slurry bio-reactor. The demonstration was car-
ried out at the MacGillis and Gibbs Superfund site in New
Brighton, MN. The report analyzes the results from the SITE
demonstration. It includes discussion of the operation of the
three separate treatment technologies (SW, SBR, and BATS)
evaluated in the test and provides flow diagrams, a summary
of the sampling and analytical programs, an economic analy-
sis, and a quality assurance/quality control evaluation of the
data. Conclusions were reached concerning the technology's
suitability for use in remediations involving both similar and
different materials at other sites.

Specifications: Also available in set of 3 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB92-115302. See also Volume 2, Part A, PB92-
115328. Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 334p.
Subject Index keywords; Soil treatment, Land pollution
control, Waste management, Wood preservatives, Biological
treatment, Superfund, Soil washing, BioTrol soil washing
system.

300

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION: Soil

Cleanup Technologies

1542 Technology Evaluation Report: Pilot-Scale
Demonstration of a Slurry-Phase Biological Reactor for
Creosote-Contaminated Soil. Volume 1

Order Number PB93-205532CDH, price: PC A09/MF A02
IT Corp., Cincinnati, OH.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; Mar 93
The report documents a pilot-scale test of a slurry-phase bio-
logical reactor for treatment of creosote-contaminated soil.
The technology used was a reactor system in which an
aqueous slurry of soil was mixed with appropriate nutrients
and seeded with micro-organisms to enhance the biodegra-
dation process. In the 12-wk study, a creosote-contaminated
soil from the Burlington Northern Superfund Site in Brainerd,
MN, was used to test the slurry-phase reactors. The results
of a previously-performed bench-scale study were used to
optimize a pilot-scale reactor system. Each reactor contained
84 I of 30% slurry (soil: water, w/v). The pilot-scale phase
utilized an inoculum of indigenous polynuclear aromatic hy-
drocarbon (PAH) degraders (9.3 x 10 to the 7th power CFU/
g of soil), an inorganic nitrogen supplement in the form of
NH4(-N), and a media broth containing potassium, phos-
phate, magnesium, calcium, and iron. The reduction of total
PAHs exceeded 87%. The report presents detailed informa-
tion concerning the operation, sampling and analysis, and re-
sults achieved with the pilot-scale slurry-phase bioremedia-
tion system.

Specifications: See also PB92-129683. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 181 p.

Subject index keywords; Biological treatment, Creosote,
Soils, Superfund, Waste treatment.

1543 Technology Evaluation Report: Toronto Harbour
Commissioners (THC) Soil Recycle Treatment Train

Order Number PB93-216067CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
Science Applications International Corp., Buffalo, NY.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Jul 93

The report summarizes the results and activities of the dem-
onstration testing of Toronto Harbor Commissioners (THC)
Soil Recycle Treatment Train. The Demonstration was con-
ducted at a site within the Port Industrial District (PID) in To-
ronto, Ontario, Canada under the Superfund Innovative Tech-
nology Evaluation (SITE) Program developed by the U.S. En-
vironmental Protection Agency (EPA). The demonstration ex-
amined a part of THC's on-going evaluation of the treatment
train during the first nine months of 1992. EPA elected to
sample the process during the processing of Soil B, which
based on field sampling, was expected to exhibit relatively
high organic (oil and grease, PAH compounds) and inorganic
(heavy metals) contaminants.

Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
148p.

Subject index keywords: Land pollution control, Chemical
treatment, Biological treatment, Toronto(Canada).

1544 Toronto Harbour Commissioners (THC) Soil Recycle
Treatment Train. Applications Analysis Report

Order Number PB94-124674CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., Cincinnati, OH.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Apr 93

This project consists of a demonstration of the Toronto Har-
bour Commissioners (THC) Soil Recycle Treatment Train.
The treatment train consists of three processes. The first
process utilizes an attrition soil wash process to separate rel-
atively uncontaminated soil from a more heavily contaminat-
ed fine slurry. The contaminated fine slurry is then further
processed in a metals removal process or a bioslurry reactor
process or both to remove organic contaminants and heavy
metals contamination. The Toronto Harbour Commissioners
conducted a long-term evaluation of this treatment train at a
55 tons per day pilot plant at 185 Cherry Street in the port of
Toronto, located in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. The Superfund
Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program conducted
a demonstration project that examined in detail the process-
ing of soil from one of the sites being evaluated in the over-
all project. The goals of this study were to evaluate the tech-
nical effectiveness and economics of a treatment process
sequence and to assess the potential applicability of the
process to other wastes and/or other Superfund and hazard-
ous waste sites.

Specifications: See also PB93-216067. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 68p.

Subject index keywords: Soil treatment, Waste treatment,
Hazardous materials, Superfund, Foreign technology, Innova-
tive treatment technologies, Soil washing, Soil Recycle Treat-
ment Train.

1545 Toxic Treatments 'ln-situ' Steam/Hot-Air Stripping
Technology. Applications Analysis Report

Order Number PB91-181768CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Science Applications International Corp., San Diego, CA;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Mar 91

A SITE Demonstration of the Toxic Treatment (USA) Inc. in-
situ steam/hot-air stripping technology (Detoxifier) was con-
ducted beginning in the fall of 1989 at the GATX Annex Ter-
minal site located in San Pedro, CA. The chemical storage
and transfer facility was contaminated with various solvents
due to spillage and a fire. Contamination extended into the
salt water table (1.8 meters). Based on the SITE Demonstra-
tion and other data, it was concluded that 85% of the volatile
organic compounds and 50% of the semivolatile organic
compounds were removed from the soil. Fugitive air emis-
sions are very low, and lateral and downward migration of
contaminants due to the treatment were minimal. Finally, it
was concluded that this in-situ process is cost competitive.
Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
49p,

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Soil treatment, Land
pollution control, Waste management, Stripping, Remedial
action, TTUSA process.

301

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION;
Solidification Technologies

1546 Toxicity Bioassay and Eluate Heavy Metals Analysis
Results of the Bench Scale Stabilization Study of Soils
from the United Chrome Superfund NPL (National
Priority List) Site Corvallis, Oregon

Order Number PB90-120049CDH, price: PC A03/MF AQ1
Corvallis Environmental Research Lab., OR; Oct 89
In support of Environmental Protection Agency Region 10
and their United Chrome studies, the staff at Environmental
Research Laboratory-Corvallis performed toxicity bioassays
and selected chemical analyses. Direct toxicity tests (i.e.
using soil as the medium) and indirect toxicity tests (i.e. using
eluates obtained from the samples) were performed. The
report presents test results for toxicity bioassays and chemi-
cal analyses for heavy metals.

Specifications: 21 p.

Subject Index keywords: Metals, Toxicity, Chemical analy-
sis, Chromium, Soil contamination, Superfund program,
Bench-scale experiments.

1547 Treatment of Nonhazardous Petroleum-
Contaminated Soils by Thermal Desorption Technologies

Order Number PB94-135118CDH, price; PC A03/MF A01
Focus Environmental, Inc., Knoxville, TN.; Foster Wheeler
Enviresponse, Inc., Edison, NJ."Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab;
Nov 93

Spills, leaks, and accidental discharges of petroleum prod-
ucts have contaminated soil at thousands of sites in the
United States. One remedial action technique for treating pe-
troleum contaminated soil is the use of thermal desorption
technologies. The paper describes the types, mechanical
and operating characteristics of thermal desorption technol-
ogies that are commercially available to treat petroleum-con-
taminated soils. It also provides step-by-step procedures to
rate the critical success factors influencing the general appli-
cability of thermal desorption at a particular site. Key factors
that determine process economics are identified, and esti-
mated cost ranges for treating petroleum-contaminated soils
are presented. Spreadsheets are provided that can be used
for performing cost analyses for specific applications.
Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of the Air and Waste Manage-
ment Association, v43 p1512-1525 Nov 93. Prepared in co-
operation with Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc., Edison,
NJ. Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincin-
nati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 14p.

Subject index keywords: Petroleum products, Chemical
spills, Superfund.

1548 Will Soil Working Work for the Sand Creek
Superfund Site

Order Number PB94-112828CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Foster Wheeler Energy Corp., Livingston, NJ.; Environmental
Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab; 1993

The 1987 Sand Creek Operable Unit 5 Record of Decision
(ROD) identified soil washing as the selected remedy to re-
mediate soils contaminated with high levels of organochlor-
ine pesticides, 2, 4-D herbicides and metals. Twenty-three
experimental runs were conducted over a two week period in
late September 1992, using a pilot scale device called the
Volume Reduction Unit (VRU). The experimental design eval-
uated the effect of two wash temperatures, two pH levels,
three surfactant types and four surfactant concentrations,
and two liquid to soil ratios on the contaminant removal effi-

ciency of the soil washing process. Site soils from three
depth classifications were used in the study.

Specifications: Presented at the Hazardous Waste Re-
search Conference, Manhattan, Kansas, May 25-26, 1993.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
OH, Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 13p.

Subject index keywords: Pesticides, Land pollution control,
Superfund. Soil washing.

1549 X-ray Fluorescence Survey of Lead Contaminated
Residential Soils In Leadville, Colorado: A Case Study

Order Number PB93-203156CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Lockheed Environmental Systems and Technologies Co., Las
Vegas, NV.; Nevada Univ., Las Vegas. Harry Reid Center for
Environmental Studies/Environmental Monitoring Systems
Lab., Las Vegas, NV; Mar 93

The California Gulch Superfund Site in Leadville, Colorado
was added to the National Priority List (NPL) in 1983. It is an
historic mining and smelting site that is currently the focus of
extensive studies on soil lead contamination and bioavailabi-
lity, Studies of ground and surface water impacts are also in
progress. Personnel from the Environmental Protection
Agencies (EPA) Environmental Monitoring Systems Laborato-
ry at Las Vegas (EMSL-LV), the Denver office of Roy F.
Weston, Inc., and Geostat Systems, Inc. (GSI) used field-
portable X-ray fluorescence (FPXRF) to determine the spatial
distribution of fead concentrations In residential soils. The
report details the FPXRF program sample collection, prepa-
ration, and analysis procedures, database management, and
program quality assurance efforts at Leadville. The program
clearly demonstrates that small, field portable XRF instru-
mentation can produce large quantities of acceptable quality
data in a timely and cost-efficient manner when used proper-
ty-

Specifications: Prepared in cooperation with Nevada Univ.,
Las Vegas. Harry Reid Center for Environmental Studies.
Sponsored by Environmental Monitoring Systems Lab., Las
Vegas, NV, 31 p.

Subject index keywords: Lead(Metai), X-ray fluorescence
analysis, Soil contamination.

TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM
IMPLEMENTATION: Solidification
Technologies

1550 Applications Analysis Report: Silicate Technology
Corporation's Solidification/Stabilization Technology for
Organic and Inorganic Contaminants In Soils

Order Number PB93-172948CDH, price: PC A07/MF A02
PRC Environmental Management, Inc., McLean, VA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Dec 92
The STC demonstration was conducted under EPA's Super-
fund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program in
November, 1990, at the Selma Pressure Treating (SPT)
wood preserving site in Selma, California. The SPT site was
contaminated with both organics, predominantly pentach'oro-
phenol (PCP), inorganics, mainly arsenic, chromium, and
copper. Extensive sampling and analyses were performed on
the waste both before and after treatment to compare physi-
cal, chemical, and leaching characteristics of raw and treated

302

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Solidification Technologies

wastes. STC's contaminated soil treatment process was
evaluated based on contaminant mobility measured by nu-
merous leaching tests, structural integrity of the solidified ma-
terial, measured by physical and engineering tests and mor-
phological examinations; and economic analysis, using cost
information supplied by STC and the results of the SITE
demonstration, the vendor's design and test data, and other
laboratory and field applications of the technology. It dis-
cusses the advantages, disadvantages, and limitations, as
well as estimated costs of the technology.

Specifications: See also PB93-131787. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 150p.

Subject index keywords: Soil treatment, Solidification, Sta-
bilization, Hazardous materials, Waste treatment, Silicate
Technology Corporation.

1551 Chemfix Technologies, Inc. Solidification/
Stabilization Process. Application Analysis Report

Order Number PB91-187C54CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Chicago, IL.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; May 91
The Chemfix Solidification/Stabilization treatment process
was evaluated under EPA's SITE program. The process re-
duced leaching levels of lead and copper. Physical testing
results were acceptable. Appropriate applications and proc-
ess limitations are discussed in the report.

Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
44p,

Subject Index keywords: Solidification, Stabilization, Super-
fund, Waste treatment, Hazardous materials, Chemfix proc-
ess, Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program.

1552 Description of EPA SITE Demonstration of the
HAZCON Stabilization Process at the Douglassville,
Pennsylvania Superfund Site

Order Number PB90-216334CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; c1989

One technology field tested under the SITE research pro-
gram was the HAZCON stabilization process. This process
treats the waste by mixing it with Portland cement, water (if
needed) and chloranan, a proprietary chemical. By compar-
ing the chemical and physical properties of the waste before
and after treatment, this field demonstration developed data
on the strength and leaching potential expected after treat-
ment from a range of waste characteristics. Six wastes at the
Douglassville, PA Superfund Site, containing up to 25% or-
ganics and 2% lead, were treated and evaluated. The physi-
cal strength (200 to 1500 psi) and durability, i.e., long-term
stability, of the stabilized wastes were good. Even in wastes
with high levels of organics (25%), stabilization of lead was
very successful. Leaching results determined that lead con-
centrations dropped by factors between 100 and 1000 after
treatment. Stabilization of organics, however, achieved mixed
results. Leachate concentrations generally did not change
between treated and untreated samples. It could not be de-
termined if this was a failure of the treatment process or an
anomaly of the test procedure. (Copyright (c) 1989 Air &
Waste Management Association.)

Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of the Air and Waste Manage-
ment Association, p282-286 Mar 89. Bp.

Subject index keywords: Waste treatment, Stabilization,
Solidification, Hazardous materials, Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation, Encapsulation, Land pollution, Clean-
up operations.

1553 EPA SITE Demonstration of the International Waste
Technologles/Geo-Con In situ Stabilization/Solidification
Process

Order Number PB91-171686CDH, price; PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab.; Foster Wheeler Enviresponse,
Inc., Edison, NJ; cNov 90

The paper presents an EPA evaluation of the first field dem-
onstration of an in situ stabilization/solidification process for
contaminated soil under the EPA Superfund Innovative Tech-
nology Evaluation (SITE) program. Demonstration of the
process was a joint effort of two vendors: International
Waste Technologies' (IWT) of Wichita, Kansas, who provided
the treatment process, specifically the proprietary additive
called HWT-20, and Geo-Con, Inc., of Pittsburgh, Pennsylva-
nia, who provided both engineering and hardware for the in
situ soil treatment. The field demonstration took place in
April, 1988 at a site contaminated mainly with polychlorinated
biphenyls (PCBs). EPA tested the soil before and after treat-
ment and the EPA evaluation of the process is based on re-
sults from the testing. A year later, in April 1989, EPA tested
again the treated soil and results of that testing were com-
pared to those of the demonstration. Results of the EPA
evaluation of the IWT process, the Geo-Con performance,
and treatment costs are discussed separately. (Copyright (c)
1990-Air & Waste Management Association.)

Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of Air and Waste Management
Association, v40 n11 p1569-1576 Nov 90. See also PB89-
194161 and PB89-194179. Prepared in cooperation with
Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc., Edison, NJ. 10p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Stabilization,
Solidification, Remedial action, Soil treatment, Land pollution,
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program.

1554 Evaluation of Waste Stabilized by the Soliditech
SITE Technology

Order Number PB92-136878CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; C1990

The Soliditech technology demonstration was conducted at
the Imperial Oil Company/Champion Chemicals Superfund
Site in Monmouth County, New Jersey. Contamination at the
site includes PCBs, lead (with various other metals) and oil
and grease. The process mixes the waste material with pro-
prietary additives, pozzolanic materials, and water, in a batch
mixer. Technical criteria used to evaluate its effectiveness in-
clude (1) short-term extraction and engineering tests; (2)
long-term extraction and and leaching tests; (3) petrographic
examination; and (4) structural integrity observations. Three
different waste types-contaminated soil, waste filter cake ma-
terial and oily sludge-and a sand blank were treated. Neither
PCBs nor volatile organic compounds were detected In the
extracts of treated wastes. Significantly reduced amounts of
metals were detected in the extracts of treated wastes com-
pared to untreated.

Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of Air and Waste Management
Association, v40 n3 p310-316 1990. See also PB91-129817.
9p.

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:

Solidification Technologies

Subject index keywords: Chemical stabilization, Solidifica-
tion, Waste disposal, Waste treatment, Superfund,
Monmouth(New Jersey).

1555 Immobilization Technology Seminar; Speaker Slide
Copies and Supporting Information

Order Number PB90-127473CDH, price: PC A09/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Center for
Environmental Research Information; Oct 89
Solidification/stabilization technology is being utilized as a
treatment technology for Resource Conservation and Recov-
ery Act RCRA listed waste and waste from uncontrolled haz-
ardous waste sites. Several Best Demonstrated Available
Technology (BOAT) levels for Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA) waste codes are based on solidifica-
tion/stabilization technology. Vitrification technology is
emerging as an alternative technology for hazardous waste.
Approximately 25 percent of the Records of Decision (RODs)
for Fiscal Year 1988 for the Superfund Program involved so-
lidification/stabilization.

Specifications: Also available from Supt. of Docs. 183p.
Subject index keywords: Meetings, Solidification, Stabiliza-
tion, Waste treatment, Hazardous materials, Vitrification,
Technology utilization.

1556 In-situ Stabilization/Solidification of PCB
(Polychlorinated Biphenyls)-Contaminated Soil

Order Number PB90-113291CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc., Edison, NJ.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; 1989

An evaluation was performed of the International Waste
Technologies HWT-20 additive and the Geo-Con, Inc. deep-
soil-mixing equipment for an in situ stabilization/solidification
process and its applicability as an onsite treatment method
for waste site cleanup. A demonstration was held at a Gen-
eral Electric Co. electric service shop in Hialeah, Florida
which provided the bulk of the information for the technology
evaluation. Conclusions were reached concerning the tech-
nology's suitability for use in cleanups of various contami-
nants and at different locations: immobilization of polychlori-
nated biphenyls (PCBs) appears likely, although due to low
leachate concentrations for both the treated and untreated
soils, a result of the low soil concentrations encountered in
most of the tests, it cannot be confirmed; heavy metals can
probably be immobilized; volatile organics can be reduced to
low concentrations in treated soil leachates, but the ability to
immobilize is not clear; a small volume increase on the order
of magnitude of 5%-10% can be expected; the solidified ma-
terial shows satisfactory physical properties, with high uncon-
fined compressive strengths, moderately tow permeabilities,
and satisfactory integrity for the wet/dry samples, but unsat-
isfactory integrity for the freeze/thaw samples; and micros-
tructural results indicate a dense, low-porosity, homogeneous
mass, indicating a potential for long-term durability.
Specifications: Presented at International Conference for
New Frontiers for Hazardous Waste Management (3rd), held
in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania on September 10-13, 1989.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 13p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Solidifica-
tion, Site surveys, Waste disposal, Stabilization, Collecting
methods, Land pollution, Polychlorinated biphenyls, Super-

fund program, International Waste Technology, Cleanup op-
erations, Remedial action.

1557 International Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In situ
Stabilization/Solidification: Applications Analysis Report

Order Number PB90-269085CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc., Edison, NJ.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Aug 90
An evaluation was performed of the International Waste
Technologies (IWT) HWT-20 additive and the Geo-Con, Inc.
deep-soil-mixing equipment for an in situ stabilization/solidifi-
cation process and its applicability as an on-site treatment
method for waste site cleanup. A demonstration was held at
a General Electric Co. electric service shop in Hialeah, Flori-
da. Conclusions were reached concerning the technology's
suitability for use in cleanups of various contaminants and at
different locations. The conclusions drawn from the available
data are that; (1) immobilization of polychlorinated biphenyls
(PCBs) appears likely, although due to low leachate concen-
trations for both the treated and untreated soils as a result of
the low PCB concentrations in soil encountered in most of
the tests, it cannot be confirmed; (2) heavy metals can prob-
ably be immobilized; (3) volatile organics can be reduced to
low concentrations in treated soil leachates, but the ability to
immobilize is not clear; and (4) a small volume increase on
the order of magnitude of 5%-10% can be expected.
Specifications: See also PB90-269077. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 92p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Earth fills, Waste treatment, Superfund, Polychlorinat-
ed biphenyls.

1558 Results from the Stabilization Technologies
Evaluated by Hie Site Program. New England
Environmental Expo 90

Order Number PB91-162479CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; 1990

The Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Pro-
gram was developed to assist the development of hazardous
waste treatment technologies necessary to implement new
cleanup standards which require greater reliance on perma-
nent remedies. As part of the SITE program, four stabilization
and solidification processes have been performed, six treat-
ability studies are underway, and five demonstrations are in
the planning and site selection phase. During these demon-
strations, the effectiveness of the stabilization/solidification
processes was evaluated by measuring the chemical and
physical characteristics before and after treatment. An over-
all conclusion, from the completed SITE demonstration on
Stabilization Processes, is that a Treatability study should be
required before selecting a remediation technology. Also, it
appears that each stabilization process has similar capabili-
ties to treat metals and inorganics, and significantly different
capabilities to handle organics.

Specifications: Proceedings of the New England Environ-
mental Expo 90, Hynes Convention Center, Boston, MA.,
April 10-12,1990. 16p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Hazardous materials,
Waste treatment, Stabilization, Remedial action.

304

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:

Solidification Technologies

1559 SITE Demonstration of the CHEMFIX Solidification/
Stabilization Process at the Portable Equipment Salvage
Company Site

Order Number PB90-217621CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; c1990

A demonstration of the CHEMFIX solidification/stabilization
process was conducted under the United States Environ-
mental Protection Agency's (EPA) Superfund Innovative
Technology Evaluation (SITE) program. The demonstration
was conducted in March 1989, at the Portable Equipment
Salvage Company (PESC) uncontrolled hazardous waste site
in Clackamas, Oregon. Waste containing lead, copper, and
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) from four different areas of
the site were treated. Results showed substantial reduction
of ieachable lead and copper between the untreated waste
and treated waste utilizing the EPA Toxicity Characteristics
Leaching Procedure (TCLP) test. The effectiveness of this
process for immobilizing PCBs could not be determined since
the raw waste did not leach PCBs at high concentrations, uti-
lizing the TCLP test. Data from other leaching tests for lead
and copper would need to be utilized as input into a site spe-
cific groundwater model to determine whether solidification/
stabilization would be an acceptable remedy for the site.
Physical testing results indicated durability in exposed condi-
tions. (Copyright (C) 1990-Air and Waste Management Asso-
ciation.)

Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of the Air and Waste Manage-
ment Association, p 166-170 1990. 7p.

Subject Index keywords: Waste disposal, Hazardous mate-
rials, Solidification, Stabilization, Waste treatment, Superfund
Innovative Technology Evaluation, Encapsulation, CHEMFIX
process, Remedial action.

1560 Solidification/Stabilization; Is It Always Appropriate

Order Number PB92-191188CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab.; American Society for Testing
and Materials, Philadelphia, PA; c1992

The increasing use of solidification/stabilization (S/S) tech-
nologies in the United States, especially for remediation of
sites under the Superfund program, has raised several ques-
tions about the overall appropriateness of S/S. For many
types of hazardous waste, notably for heavy metals, S/S
usually gives excellent results for long-term immobilization,
as measured by existing physical and chemical protocols.
However, results of several studies, as well as data from re-
mediation of several Superfund sites, have raised concerns
about whether S/S is a valid technology for treating organic-
bearing wastes. Furthermore, studies also provide evidence
that tests other than the regulatory extraction tests (for ex-
ample, toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP)) will
be required to evaluate the effectiveness of S/S, especially
when applied to organic wastes. Suggestions are offered for
improving treatability studies used for evaluating S/S applied
to selected metals. Approaches are also provided for deter-
mining the appropriateness of S/S applied to organic con-
taminants. The paper will focus on evaluating chemical
leaching behavior as a measure of S/S effectiveness. A de-
cision tree is presented for determining the suitability of S/S
treatment for wastes containing organic contaminants, which
can be more difficult than metals to immobilize.

Specifications: Pub. in Stabilization and Solidification of
Hazardous, Radioactive, and Mixed Wastes, v2 STP1123
p18-32. See also PB91-182741 and PB90-116773. Prepared
in cooperation with American Society for Testing and Materi-
als, Philadelphia, PA. 18p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Solidifica-
tion, Stabilization, Waste treatment, Remedial action.

1561 Solidification/Stabilization of Organlcs and
Inorganics

Order Number PB94-106333CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 92
The engineering bulletin on solidification refers to techniques
that encapsulate hazardous waste into a solid material of
high structural integrity. Encapsulation involves either fine
waste particles (microencapsulation) or a large block or con-
tainer of wastes (macroencapsulation). Stabilization refers to
techniques that treat hazardous waste by converting it into a
less soluble, mobile, or toxic form. Solidification/Stabilization
processes utilize one or both of these techniques. The bulle-
tin provides information on the technology applicability, the
technology limitations, a description of the technology, the
types of residuals produced, site requirements, the latest per-
formance data, the status of the technology, and sources of
further information.

Specifications: See also PB87-116745, PB90-179656 and
PB93-172948. 15p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Stabilization,
Solidification, Waste treatment, Remedial action, Solid waste
disposal.

1562 Solidltech, Inc. Solidification/Stabilization Process:
Applications Analysis Report

Order Number PB91-129817CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 90
The Soliditech process mixes and chemically treats waste
material with Urrichem (a proprietary reagent), additives, poz-
zolanic materials or cement, and water, in aten-cubic yard
batch concrete mixer to form a more stable material. This
technology was demonstrated in December 1988 at the Im-
perial Oil Company/Champion Chemical Company Superfund
site in Morganville, New Jersey. Contaminated soil, waste
filter cake material, and oily sludge, containing PCBs, various
metals, and petroleum hydrocarbons were treated. The proc-
ess was evaluated based on contaminant mobility, measured
by leaching and permeability tests; structural and integrity of
the solidified material, measured by physical, engineering,
and morphological tests; and economic analysis, using cost
information supplied by Soliditech, Inc. The conclusions
drawn were: (1) process can solidify waste materials contain-
ing high oil and grease concentrations; (2) heavy metals
such as arsenic, cadmium, lead, and zinc are successfully
immobilized; (3) short-term physical stability of the treated
waste was high; (4) some long-term tests of the treated
wastes indicate a potential for physical degradation, while
others indicate stability; (5) treatment results in a 22 percent
average volume increase and an average bulk density in-
crease of 33 percent; and (6) the process is economical.
Specifications: 59p.

305

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Solidification Technologies

Subject index keywords: Chemical stabilization, Solidifica-
tion, Superfund, Remedial action, Technology assessment,
Soliditech process.

1563 Sorption, Important in Stabilized/Solidified Waste
Forms

Order Number PB94-155256CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Dames and Moore, Cincinnati, OH.; Cincinnati Univ., OH.
Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering.*Environmental
Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab; c1994

Sorption is one of the important fixation mechanisms of
metais in stabilized/solidified waste forms. In the present
work, the sorption-desorption processes active in cement-
based waste forms in acetic acid solutions were investigated.
Experimental results indicated that the extent of sorption of a
metal ion was strongly pH dependent. Cement-based waste
forms had similar sorption characteristics as amphorous
silica gel. The pH of the sorption edge is 5 to 6.5 for Pb(2 —)
and As(3—), 6 to 8.5 for Cd(2 ), and 8 to 12 for Ca(2 —). In
addition, almost 90% of the lead and cadmium were leach-
able at pH 4.5, while nearly 30% of arsenic remained un-
leached at the same pH. (Copyright (c) Hazardous Waste
and Hazardous Materials 1992.)

Specifications: Pub, in Hazardous Waste and Hazardous
Materials, v9 n3 p289-296 1992. See also PB90-127473.
Prepared in cooperation with Cincinnati Univ., OH. Dept. of
Civil and Environmental Engineering. Sponsored by Environ-
mental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 11 p.

Subject index keywords: Sorption, Waste treatment, Solidi-
fication, Stabilization, Superfund, Remedial action, Stabilized/
solidified waste.

1564 Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Technology Demonstration Summary: Chemflx
Solidification/Stabilization Process, Clackamas, Oregon

Order Number PB91-921373CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Dec 90
The document summarizes the demonstration of Chemfix's
patented stabilization/solidification technology at the Porta-
ble Equipment Salvage Company (PESC) site in Clackamas,
Oregon, as a part of the Superfund Innovative Technology
Evaluation (SITE) Program. The chemfix process is designed
to solidify and stabilize hazardous wastes in liquids, sludges,
soils, and ashes using proprietary additives.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Stabilization,
Waste treatment, Superfund, Clackamas(Oregon).

1565 Technical Resource Document: Solidification/
Stabilization and Its Application to Waste Materials

Order Number PB93-237535CDH, price: PC A16/MF A03
Battelle, Columbus, OH.; Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab; Jun 93
Stabilization/solidification (S/S) processes are effective in
treating a variety of difficult to manage waste materials for
reuse or disposal. S/S has been identified as the Best Dem-
onstrated Available Technology for treating a wide range of
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) non-

wastewater hazardous waste subcategories. S/S has been
selected as the treatment technology of choice for 26% of
the remedial actions complete at Superfund sites through
fiscal year 1992. The standard bulk material handling and
mixing equipment used in many S/S processes make the
technology appear simple. The morphology and chemistry of
S/S-treated waste are complex. Selection of the binder re-
quires an understanding of the chemistry of the bulk material,
the contaminants, and the binder. Battelle, under the direc-
tion of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, has pre-
pared the Technical Resources Document (TRD) as a re-
source for the S/S user community and a guide to promote
the best future application of S/S processes.

Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH, Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
369p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste man-
agement, Waste treatment.

1566 Technology Evaluation Report Chemfix
Technologies, Inc. Solidification/Stabilization Process,
Clackamas, Oregon. Volume 1

Order Number PB91-127696CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Sep 90
The CHEMFIX solidification/stabilization process was evalu-
ated in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's SITE
program. Waste from an uncontrolled hazardous waste site
was treated by the CHEMFIX process and subjected to a va-
riety of physical and chemical test methods. Physical testing
on the treated material indicated durability in exposed envi-
ronmental conditions. The treated waste exhibited adequate
physical properties. The treated waste generally met the reg-
ulatory leaching criteria established for the demonstration.
Volume I provides a comprehensive description of the tech-
nology and the procedures used in the SITE demonstration,
a complete description of the analytical results from the SITE
demonstration, and an evaluation of the cost of the CHEM-
FIX technology. Volume II contains the analytical data, QA/
QC data, and other information related to this SITE demon-
stration.

Specifications: See also Volume 2, PB90-274127. 133p.
Subject index keywords: Waste treatment, Solidification,
Chemical stabilization, Superfund, Land pollution abatement,
CHEMFIX process.

1567 Technology Evaluation Report: International Waste
Technologles/Geo-Con In situ Stabilization/
Solidification. Volume 3. Update Report

Order Number PB90-269069CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc., Edison, NJ.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 90

306

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:

Solidification Technologies

Hialeah, FL. Volume 3 discusses the results of the long-term
monitoring tests and how they compare to the results of the
demonstration.

Specifications: See also PB90-269085 and Volume 2,
PB89-194179 and Volume 4, PB90-269077. Sponsored by
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Re-
duction Engineering Lab. 54p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Waste dis-
posal, Earth fills, Waste treatment, Superfund.

1568 Technology Evaluation Report: International Waste
Teehnologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabilization/

Solidification. Volume 4. Update Report

Order Number PB90-269077CDH, price; PC A16/MF A02
Foster Wheeler Enviresponse, Inc., Edison, NJ.;

Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 90

The long-term performance tests provide information on the
first follow-up sampling and analysis on the SITE program
demonstration of the International Waste Technologies addi-
tive, and the Geo-Con deep soil mixing equipment. The sam-
ples containing PCBs, were collected one year after the
demonstration, and the chemical and physical test results
were compared to those obtained during the demonstration.
This was the first part of a 5-year monitoring program on this
in-situ stabilization/solidification process. The demonstration
was performed in April 1988 at an electric service shop in
Hiateah, FL. Volume 4 contains the technical operating data-
logs, laboratory analyses, and microstructural analyses.
Specifications: See also PB90-269085 and Volume 3,
PB90-269069. Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
352p.

Subject index keywords: Hazardous materials, Solid waste
disposal, Earth fills, Waste treatment.

1569 Technology Evaluation Report SITE Program
Demonstration Test, HAZCON Solidification,
Douglassvilie, Pennsylvania. Volume 1

Order Number PB89-158810CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
Enviresponse, Inc., Livingston, NJ.; Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Office of Research and
Development; Feb 89

The major objectives of the HAZCON Solidification SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration Test were to develop reliable perform-
ance and cost information. The HAZCON process mixes the
hazardous waste material with cement, a proprietary additive
called Chloranan and water. The Chloranan is claimed to
neutralize the inhibiting effect that organics normally have on
the hydration of cement. The technical criteria used to evalu-
ate the effectiveness of the HAZCON process were contami-
nant mobility, based on leaching and permeability tests; and
potential integrity of solidified soils, based on measurements
of physical and microstructural properties. Extensive sam-
pling and analyses were performed showing the concentra-
tion of the organics were the same in the leachates of the
untreated and treated soils, heavy metals reductions were
achieved, and structural properties of the solidified cores
were found to indicate good long-term stability.

Specifications: See also PB89-158828. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Office of Re-
search and Development. 131 p.

Subject Index keywords: Hazardous materials, Cost analy-
sis, Encapsulating, Oil wastes, Solidification, Superfund
project, SITE program, HAZCON solidification process, Oil
pollution.

1570 Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Program
Demonstration Test, Solldlteeh, Inc., Solidification/
Stabilization Process. Volume 1

Order Number PB90-191750CDH, price: PC A07/MF A01
PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Chicago, IL.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Feb 90
The primary objective of the Soliditech, Inc. solidification/sta-
bilization demonstration was to develop reliable performance
and cost information. The demonstration took place at the
Imperial Oil Company/Champion Chemical Company Super-
fund site in Morganville, New Jersey. Contamination at this
site includes PCBs, various metals, and oil and grease. The
Solid itech process mixes the waste material with Urrichem, a
proprietary reagent; proprietary additives; pozzolanic materi-
als or cement (cement was used for the demonstration); and
water, in an open-topped concrete mixer. The technical crite-
ria used to evaluate the effectiveness of the Soliditech proc-
ess were contaminant mobility, based upon leaching and per-
meability teste; and the structural integrity of the solidified
material, based upon physical and morphological tests. The
treated wastes had significant structural integrity, low perme-
ability, and higher bulk density than the untreated wastes. pH
values of the treated wastes were highly influenced by alka-
linity of the Portland cement added during treatment. Docu-
mentation will consist of two reports. This one is the Tech-
nology Evaluation Report that describes the field activities
and laboratory results.

Specifications: See also Volume 2, PB90-191768. Spon-
sored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 138p.

Subject index keywords: Waste treatment, Hazardous ma-
terials, Solidification, Stabilization, Technology utilization, Su-
perfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program, Solidi-
tech process.

1571 Technology Evaluation Report SITE Program
Demonstration Test, Soliditech, Inc. Solidification/
Stabilization Process. Volume 2

Order Number PB9Q-191768CDH, price: PCS77.00
PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Chicago, IL.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Feb 90

The primary objective of the Soliditech, Inc. solidification/sta-
bilization demonstration was to develop reliable performance
and cost Information. The demonstration took place at the
Imperial Oil Company/Champion Chemical Company Super-
fund site in Morganville, New Jersey. Contamination at this
site includes PCBs, various metals, and oil and grease. The
Soliditech process mixes the waste material with Urrichem, a
proprietary reagent; proprietary additives; pozzolanic materi-
als or cement {cement was used for the demonstration); and
water, in an open-topped concrete mixer. The technical crite-
ria used to evaluate the effectiveness of the Soliditech proc-
ess were contaminant mobility, based upon leaching and per-
meability tests; and the structural integrity of the solidified
material, based upon physical and morphological tests. The
treated wastes had significant structural integrity, low perme-

307

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:
Surface Water & Sludge Treatment Technologies

ability, and higher bulk density than the untreated wastes. pH
values of the treated wastes were highly influenced by alka-
linity of the portland cement added during treatment. Docu-
mentation will consist of two reports. This one is the Applica-
tion Analysis Report that provides an interpretation of the
data, and discusses the potential applicability of the technol-
ogy.

Specifications: See also Volume 1, PB90-191750. Portions
of this document are not fully legible. Sponsored by Environ-
mental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 675p.

Subject index keywords: Waste treatment, Hazardous ma-
terials, Solidification, Stabilization, Technology utilization, Su-
perfund Innovative Technology Evaluation Program, Solidi-
tech process.

TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM

IMPLEMENTATION: Surface Water &
Sludge Treatment Technologies

1572 Acid Volatile Sulfide Predicts the Acute Toxicity of
Cadmium and Nickel In Sediments

Order Number PB93-222107CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Manhattan Coll., Bronx, NY.; Science Applications
International Corp., Narragansett, Rl.*Environmental
Research Lab., Narragansett, Rl; c1991
Laboratory toxicity tests using amphipods, oligochaetes, and
snails with spiked freshwater and marine sediments and with
contaminated sediments collected from an EPA Superfund
site demonstrate that no significant mortality occurs relative
to controls if the molar concentration of acid volatile sulfide
(AVS) in the sediment is greater than the molar concentra-
tion of simultaneously extracted cadmium and/or nickel. Al-
though it Is well-known that these metals can form insoluble
sulfides, it apparently has not been realized that AVS is a re-
active pool of solid-phase sulfide that is available to bind
metals and render that portion unavailable and nontoxic to
biota. Thus, the AVS concentration of a sediment establishes
the boundary below which these metals cease to exhibit an
acute toxicity in freshwater and marine sediments. (Copyright
(c) 1991 American Chemical Society.)

Specifications: Pub. in Environmental Science and Tech-
nology, v26 n1 p96-101 1992. Prepared in cooperation with
Science Applications International Corp., Narragansett, Rl.
Sponsored by Environmental Research Lab., Narragansett,
Rl, 8p.

Subject index keywords: Toxicity, Cadmium, Nickel, Water
pollution effects{Animals), Acid volatile sulfides.

1573 Application of a Water Quality Assessment
Modeling System at a Superfund Site

Order Number PB92-164490CDH, price: PC A05/MF AO I
AScI Corp., Athens, GA.; Environmental Research Lab.,
Athens, GA. Office of Research and Development; Aug 91
Water quality modeling and related exposure assessments at
a Superfund site, Silver Bow Creek-Clark Fork River in Mon-
tana, demonstrate the capability to predict the fate of mining
waste pollutants in the environment. A linked assessment
system - consisting of hydrology and erosion, river hydrau-
lics, surface water quality, metal speciation, non-point source
and groundwater mixing and transport models - has been

applied at the site to show the applicability of such modeling
schemes and the complexities involved in the application.
Some of the models had to be modified to match the re-
quirements of this project. Graphs of the water quality pa-
rameters show good fit between the measured and predicted
concentrations at some stations whereas substantial devi-
ations are observed at other stations along the course of the
stream.

Specifications: See also PB88-144167 and PB88-185095.

Sponsored by Environmental Research Lab., Athens, GA,

Office of Research and Development. 94p.

Subject index keywords: Mine wastes, Hydrology, Water

quality, Water pollution effects, Superfund, Mathematical

models.

1574 Application of 'Real-Time' Monitoring in Decision
Making: The New Bedford Harbor Pilot Dredging Project

Order Number PB94-130747CDH, price: PC A01/MF AC1
Environmental Research Lab., Narragansett, Rl; 1994
A decision-making framework was established for assessing
the impacts of a pilot dredging study at the New Bedford
Harbor, MA, Superfund site. Concern over possible environ-
mental Impacts due to dredging at the site necessitated that
a monitoring program be implemented to ensure that unac-
ceptable water quality impacts did not occur during the
project. A committee of environmental managers from Feder-
al and state government was established with the authority
to assess and modify the operation on a daily basis. Finally,
a 'real-time' monitoring plan was implemented in which water
samples were collected, analyzed within 16 hours, and the
data supplied to the management committee in order to
assess the environmental impact of the previous days' oper-
ation, The combined use of site-specific criteria and a 'real-
time' decision making management process allowed for suc-
cessful completion of the project with a minimal effect on
water quality.

Specifications; Pub. in Canadian Technical Report Fisher-
ies and Aquatic Sciences, v1 (1774) p76-79 1991. Proceed-
ings of the Annual Toxicology Workshop (17th), Vancouver,
BC (Canada). 5p,

Subject Index keywords: Dredging, Water pollution monitor-
ing, Polychlorinated biphenyls.

1575 CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWS CERCLA Site
Sampling Program: Detailed Data Report

Order Number PB91-921270CDH, price; PC A12/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 90
The document contains wastewater data obtained from sam-
pling at seventeen CERCLA sites during a study of
wastewater discharges from CERCLA sites to publicly owned
treatment works (POTWs). The document serves as an ap-
pendix to the report summarizing the findings of the CERCLA
site sampling program in Section 3 (CERCLA Site Data
Report) in the USEPA CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWs
Treatability Manual.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Publicly Owned Treatment Works.

308

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:

Surface Water & Sludge Treatment Technologies

1576 CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWs; Guidance
Manual

Order Number PB90-274531CDH, price: PC A11/MF A02
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 90
The purpose of the guidance manual is to provide the cur-
rent regulatory framework and technical and administrative
guidance that is necessary for a Feasability Study (FS) evalu-
ating the remedial alternative of discharging wastes from
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,
and Liability Act (CERCLA) sites to POTWs. The remedial al-
ternative Is to be evaluated and compared to other alterna-
tives developed in the FS. The POTW discharge alternative
consists of discharging untreated or pretreated wastes to a
POTW for treatment and disposal. Aqueous wastes from
CERCLA sites can constitute a majority of waste treated
during remedial clean-up efforts. These wastes can include
groundwater, leachate, surface runoff, and other aqueous
wastes.

Specifications: Also available from Supt, of Docs. 226p.
Subject index keywords: Water pollution, Ground water,
Water treatment, Waste water disposal, Industrial waste
treatment, Remedial actions, Sewage treatment plants, Site
discharges.

1577 CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWS Treatability
Manual

Order Number PB91-921269CDH, price: PCS77.00
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response; Aug 90
The CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWs Treatability Manual
was prepared for the U.S. EPA under Contract No. 68-03-
3412. The manual is a compilation of mostly technical Infor-
mation a treatability data obtained in a study conducted by
the Office of Water Regulations and Standards Industrial
Technology Division (OWRS-ITD) on Comprehensive Envi-
ronmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
CERCLA wastewater discharges to POTWs. The information
is provided to aid in the evaluation of the feasibility of dis-
charging wastes from CERCLA sites to publicly owned treat-
ment works (POTWs).

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Waste management,
Hazardous materials, Manuals, Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response, Publicly Owned Treatment Works.

1578 Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats Feasibility
Study. Development of Sediment Cleanup Goals

Order Number PB93-181253CDH, price: PC A05/MF A01
Tetra Tech, Inc., Bellevue, WA.; PTl Environmental Services,
Bellevue, WA."Washington State Dept. of Ecology,

Olympia.* Environmental Protection Agency, Seattle, WA.
Region X; Feb 89

The document develops and evaluates sediment cleanup
goals for the implementation of sediment remedial action al-
ternatives in identified problem areas of Commencement
Bay. Tasks incorporated in the report are: compilation of in-
terim sediment cleanup goals (including identification of avail-
able sediment quality values and development of additional
values), development of options for cleanup goals that relate
to applicable regulatory mandates, and refinement of Com-

mencement Bay remedial investigation guidelines for prioritiz-
ing problem chemicals for use in evaluating the need for
source control actions.

Specifications: See also PB93-181220. Sponsored by PTl
Environmental Services, Bellevue, WA,, Washington State
Dept. of Ecology, Olympia, and Environmental Protection
Agency, Seattle, WA. Region X. 91 p.

Subject index keywords: Sediments, Commencement Bay,
Remedial action, Water pollution control, Superfund, Waste
disposal, Cleanup operations.

1579 Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats Feasibility
Study. Executive Summary

Order Number PB93-181220CDH, price: PC A06/MF A02
Tetra Tech, Inc., Bellevue, WA.; Washington State Dept. of
Ecology, Olympia.'Environmental Protection Agency, Seattle,
WA. Region X; Dec 88

The report summarizes the findings of the feasibility study
prepared for the waterways/shoreline portion of the Com-
mencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats Superfund site in
Tacoma, Washington. The purpose of the feasibility study
was to develop and evaluate the most appropriate remedial
strategies for correcting the human health and environmental
impacts associated with contaminated sediments in the site.
Specifications: See also PB93-181238, PB86-104551
through PB86-104601. Sponsored by Washington State
Dept. of Ecology, Olympia, and Environmental Protection
Agency, Seattle, WA. Region X. 1 Q8p.

Subject index keywords: Sediments, Water pollution con-
trol, Remedial action, Commencement Bay, Superfund,
Waste disposal, Cleanup operations.

1580 Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats Feasibility
Study. Volume 1

Order Number PB93-181238CDH, price: PC A25/MF A06
Tetra Tech, Inc., Bellevue, WA.; Washington State Depti of
Ecology, Olympia/Envlronmental Protection Agency, Seattle,
WA. Region X; Dec 88

The report documents the feasibility study prepared for the
waterways/shoreline portion of the Commencement Bay
Nearshore/Tideflats Superfund site in Tacoma, Washington.
The purpose of the feasibility study was to develop and
evaluate the most appropriate remedial strategies for correct-
ing the documented biological, human health and environ-
mental impacts associated with contaminated sediments in
the site. Given the large study area, the multiplicity of con-
taminant sources, and the diversity of ongoing activities
within the site, the development of the recommended reme-
dial strategies differ in many respects from the reports and
implementation strategies at more traditional Superfund sites.
Specifications: See also PB93-181246. Sponsored by
Washington State Dept. of Ecology, Olympia, and Environ-
mental Protection Agency, Seattle, WA. Region X. 592p.
Subject index keywords: Sediments, Water pollution con-
trol, Commencement Bay, Remedial action, Superfund,
Waste disposal, Cleanup operations.

309

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION;
Surface Water & Sludge Treatment Technologies

1581 Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats Feasibility
Study. Volume 2. Appendices

Order Number PB93-181246CDH, price: PC A18/MF A04
Tetra Tech, Inc., Bellevue, WA.; Washington State Dept. of
Ecology, Olympfa.* Environmental Protection Agency, Seattle,
WA. Region X; Dec 88

The report documents the feasibility study prepared for the
waterways/shoreline portion of the Commencement Bay
Nearshore/Tideflats Superfund site in Tacoma, Washington.
The purpose of the feasibility study was to develop and
evaluate the most appropriate remedial strategies for correct-
ing the documented biological, human health and environ-
mental impacts associated with contaminated sediments in
the site. Given the large study area, the multiplicity of con-
taminant sources, and the diversity of ongoing activities
within the site, the development of the recommended reme-
dial strategies differ in many respects from the reports and
implementation strategies at more traditional Superfund sites.
Volume 2 contains the following appendices: evaluation of
sediment recovery, details of dredging and capping technol-
ogies, specifications of major ARARs and TCBs, methods for
estimating costs of sediment remedial alternatives, source
loading data, sampling station locations, field survey data
report - May 1986,

Specifications; See also PB93-181253. Sponsored by
Washington State Dept. of Ecology, Olympia, and Environ-
mental Protection Agency, Seattle, WA. Region X. 408p.
Subject index keywords; Sediments, Water pollution con-
trol, Commencement Bay, Remedial action, Superfund,
Waste disposal, Cleanup operations.

1582 Dealing with Toxic Polluted Sediments in the Great
Lakes Basin

Order Number AD-P006 908/8CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Chicago, IL. Great Lakes
National Program Office; Apr 92

The United States and Canada signed the Great Lakes
Water Quality Agreement in 1972. In 1978, the Agreement
was expanded to cover pollution from toxic chemicals. Since
1973 the Great Lakes Water Quality Board has identified
specific areas such as harbors, river mouths, and connecting
channels as geographic areas of concern. Now the major
problem in the majority of these areas is in-place polluted
sediments. The Water Quality Board instituted a new ranking
system for these areas in 1985. The purpose of the new
system is to encourage progress and to allow the Board to
report the status of investigatory and remedial activities ac-
curately. The United States and Canada have banned pro-
duction and use of certain toxic compounds such as DDT,
dieldrin, and PCB's. The concentrations of these chemicals
in fish have decreased over the last several years. Now the
concentrations seem to be leveling-off, probably due to the
continuing reservoir in the sediments. The highest concentra-
tions of PCB's, up to 520,000 ppm, are found in Waukegan
Harbor. The design of the proposed remedial action, under
the United States Superfund authority, has been completed
for Waukegan.

Specifications: This article is from 'Management of Bottom
Sediments Containing Toxic Substances: Proceedings of the
U.S./Japan Experts Meeting (12th) Held in Yokohama, Japan
on 11-14 November 1986', AD-A253 002, p257-267. 11 p.
Subject index keywords: Great lakes, Pollution, Sediments,
Basins(Geographic), Toxic hazards.

1583 Development and Use of Site-Specific Chemical and
Biological Criteria for Assessing New Bedford Harbor
Pilot Dredging Project

Order Number PB91-182329CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Research Lab., Narragansett, Rl; C1991
Numerical site-specific chemical and biological criteria were
established to assess the impact of a pilot dredging project
on water quality at the New Bedford Harbor, Massachusetts,
USA, Superfund site. Because most existing chemical con-
centrations in the water column and indigenous biota ex-
ceeded federal and state water quality limits, the derivation
of site-specific criteria was required. Prior to any operational
phases of the project (i.e., dike construction, dredging), crite-
ria values were developed from background concentrations
of PCBs and metals in water and biota, as well as for the
toxic effects of water quality on the biota. During each oper-
ational phase of the project, water samples were collected,
analyzed within 16 h, and the data supplied to a manage-
ment committee in order to assess the environmental impact
of the previous days operation. The ambient unfiltered water
concentration of PCBs and metals were the only chemical or
biological criteria exceeded. Modification of the next days'
operations resulted in a return of these concentrations to
background levels. The combined use of site-specific criteria
and a real-time decision making management process al-
lowed for successful completion of the project with a minimal
effect on water quality. (Copyright (c) 1991 Springer-Verlag
New York Inc.)

Specifications: Pub. in Environmental Management, v15 n1
p105-112 1991. 10p.

Subject index keywords: Water quality management, Water
pollution, Dredging, Biological effects, Water chemistry, New
Bedford Harbor.

1584 DuPont/Oberlin Microfiltration Technology.
Applications Analysis Report

Order Number PB92-119023CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
PRC Environmental Management, Inc., Chicago, IL.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati. OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Oct 91

The DuPont/Oberlin microfiltration technology demonstration
was conducted under the SITE program at the Palmerton
Zinc Superfund site in Palmerton, Pennsylvania, in April and
May 1990. During the demonstration, the microfiltration
system achieved zinc and total suspended solids (TSS) re-
moval efficiencies of about 99.95 percent, and a filter cake
solids content of 41 percent. The filter cake contained no
free liquids, and a composite sample from all the demonstra-
tion runs passed both the extraction procedure toxicity char-
acteristic teaching procedure (TCLP) test. The filtrate met ap-
plicable National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
permit limits for metals and TSS.

Specifications: See also PB84-128677 and PB90-144155.
Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,
OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 62p.

Subject Index keywords: Water pollution control, Hazard-
ous materials, Land pollution control, Superfund, Liquid fil-
ters, Liquid wastes, Microfiltration, DuPont/Oberlin Microfiltra-
tion Treatment System.

310

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION;
Surface Water & Sludge Treatment Technologies

1585 EPA/ORD (Environmental Protection Agency/Office
of Research and Development) Role and Perspective in
Sediment Research

Order Number PB9Q-113093CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Research Lab.-Duluth, MN; 1989
Most chemical contaminants and organic wastes in aquatic
ecosystems eventually accumulate in sediments where they
may adversely affect the benthic biota, become a source of
contamination in the water column, accumulate in biological
tissues, and enter pelagic and human food chains. Contami-
nated sediments now appear to be the main source of toxic
pollutants in many bays, lakes, and rivers. Because of their
potential adverse impacts, the long periods of time associat-
ed with natural assimilation of many in-place pollutants, and
the high costs of mitigation, sediments have become a focus
of concern for many of EPA's research and regulatory pro-
grams. Programs in which sediment quality assessments are
currently required include ocean dumping, NEPA review, Su-
perfund, and estuarine protection. The documents addresses
regulatory applications, current and future sediment quality
criteria needs, and both chemical specific and nonchemical
specific sediment quality evaluations. Mitigation/prevention
of sediment quality problems are identified and five kinds of
predictive methods are suggested, as well as future research
to develop more sensitive testing capabilities.

Specifications: 13p.

Subject Index keywords: Sediments, Research projects,
Water pollution, US EPA, Sediment-water interfaces.

1586 Evaluating Amphibian Responses in Wetlands
Impacted by Mining Activities in the Western United
States

Order Number PB91-191106CDH. price: PC A03/MF A01
Corvallis Environmental Research Lab., OR.; ManTech
Environmental Technology, Inc., Corvallis, OR; 1991
An increasing awareness of declining amphibian populations
in the United States requires that the authors develop strate-
gies for evaluating anthropogenic impacts on wetlands and
the biota dependent upon these habitats. For example, in the
western United States, mining activities rr.ay impact a wet-
land and its biota directly through habitat destruction or run-
off of sediments and contaminants generated during mining
operations. Amphibians which frequent these transition
zones between terrestrial and aquatic habitats may be key
biological indicators of a wetland's status. Through a demon-
stration project located in the mining regions of western
Montana, the authors are currently using laboratory and field
methods for a wetland evaluation required within a Super-
fund ecological risk assessment.

Specifications: Pub. in Proceedings; Thome Symposium,
Apr 91. Prepared in cooperation with ManTech Environmen-
tal Technology, Inc., Corvallis, OR. 41 p.

Subject index keywords: Mining, Environmental impacts,
Amphibia, Habitability, Water pollution, Wetlands.

1587 Framework for Real-Time Decision-Making: New
Bedford Harbor Pilot Dredging Study

Order Number PB9Q-150822CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
Environmental Research Lab., Narragansett, Rl; Nov 89
New Bedford Harbor is located along Buzzards Bay between
the cities of New Bedford and Fairhaven, Mass. Since the
1940s, electronics and manufacturing companies in the area
have discharged effluents containing polychlorinated biphen-
yls (PCBs) into the Acushnet River and the harbor. Over the

past 15 years, nearly 18,000 acres of PCB- and heavy
metals-contaminated sediment have been identified, with
PCB concentrations as high as 100,000 parts per million
(ppm) in some areas of the upper harbor. In 1982, the site
was added to the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA)
National Priorities List of hazardous waste sites slated for
cleanup under the Superfund Act. A feasibility study conduct-
ed by EPA in 1984 proposed several alternatives for the re-
mediation of NBH including dredging contaminated sedi-
ments out of the harbor. Federal, State, and local officials, as
well as the public, expressed concern over dredging. Many
believed that sediments resuspended during dredging would
cause the release of contaminants that would affect biota in-
habiting both the harbor and Buzzards Bay. Others cited po-
tential pollution problems from contaminated water (leachate)
leaking from the proposed disposal site. In order to address
these concerns, the EPA decided to pre-test dredging and
possible disposal options.

Specifications: 14p.

Subject index keywords: Decision making, New Bedford
Harbor, Dredging, Waste disposal, Real time operations, Risk
assessment, Water pollution sampling, Polychlorinated bi-
phenyls, Heavy metals, Cleanup operations.

1588 Handbook for Constructed Wetlands Receiving Acid
Mine Drainage

Order Number PB93-233914CDH, price: PC A13/MF A03
Colorado School of Mines, Golden.; Knight Piesold and Co.,
Denver, CO.**Camp, Dresser and McKee, Inc., Denver,
CO.'Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Sep 93

In the summer of 1987, a pilot constructed wetland was built
at the Big Five Tunnel in Idaho Springs, Colorado. The report
details the theory, design and construction of wetlands re-
ceiving acid mine drainages, based on the second and third
year of operation of this wetland, which was funded by the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under the SITE
Emerging Technologies Program. The text is divided into two
broad sections: Part A - Theoretical Development, and Part B
- Design Consideration. In the latter sections of Part A and
through all of Part B the focus is on removal of metals by
precipitation of sulfides through the activity of sulfate reduc-
ing bacteria.

Specifications: See also PB93-190734. Prepared in coop-
eration with Knight Piesold and Co., Denver, CO., and Camp,
Dresser and McKee, Inc., Denver, CO. Sponsored by Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 252p.

Subject Index keywords: Acid mine drainage, Wetlands,
Water pollution control, Created wetlands.

1589 Handbook: Responding to Discharges of Sinking
Hazardous Substances

Order Number PB91-228346CDH, price: PC A13/MF A03
Science Applications International Corp., McLean, VA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of
Emergency and Remedial Response. *Coast Guard,
Washington, DC; Sep 87

The document provides guidance on the response to spills of
chemicals that sink in water bodies and contaminate bottom
materials. It describes the decisionmaking process associat-
ed with defining spill parameters and impacts and selecting
appropriate response measures. It also describes the clean-

311

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:

Surface Water & Sludge Treatment Technologies

up and mitigative technologies that may be used, including
containment, removal, treatment, disposal, and in situ tech-
niques. The document provides governmental and industrial
technical personnel with the means to respond to bottom
material contamination situations, whether for quick response
or for long-term remediation.

Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response, and Coast Guard, Washington, DC. 290p.

Subject index keywords: Handbooks, Hazardous materials
spills, Water pollution effects, Bottom sediments, Waste dis-
posal, Remedial response,

1590 New Methods for Modeling the Transport of Metals
from Mineral Processing Wastes Into Surface Waters

Order Number PB91-219Q97CDH, price: PC A03/MF A01
AScl Corp., Athens, GA.; Environmental Research Lab.,
Athens, GA; c1991

The estimation of contaminant fluxes into and within river
basins is the aim of the research. These new methods for
estimating contaminant loadings and fate on a comprehen-
sive basin scale based on assembled subsite behaviors have
been demonstrated for a collection of Superfund sites in the
Upper Clark Fork River basin in Montana. This portion of the
demonstration illustrates a new set of techniques for estimat-
ing the overland and surface water movement of mine waste
constituents. A linked assessment system—consisting of con-
taminant transformation, nonpoint source and groundwater
mixing and transport, surface hydrology and erosion, and sur-
face water quality models-has been developed, written,
tested, and applied at the site. Principal portions of the as-
sessment system are described. The object of the project is
to show the importance of comparing phenomenological hy-
potheses with field observations for large-scale exposure
models. Graphs of the river copper concentration show a
good fit between the measured and predicted concentrations
at some stations, whereas substantial deviations from field
measurements are observed at other stations along the
course of the river. (Copyright (c) 1991 by Marcel Dekker,
Inc.)

Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of Environmental Science and
Health, vA26 n2 p157-203 Feb 91. Sponsored by Environ-
mental Research Lab., Athens, GA. 49p.

Subject index keywords: Metals, Water pollution, Mathe-
matical models, Path of pollutants, Mine wastes.

1591 SITE-Emerging Technologies; Laser Induced
Photochemical Oxidative Destruction of Toxic Organics
in Leachates and Groundwaters

Order Number PB93-131431CDH, price: PC A04/MF A01
Energy and Environmental Engineering, Inc., Somerville, MA.
Research and Development Div.; Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab;
Dec 92

The technology described in the report has been developed
under the Emerging Technology Program of the Superfund
Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program to photo-
chemically oxidize organic compounds in wastewater by ap-
plying ultraviolet radiation using an excimer laser. The energy
supplied by the laser is sufficient to stimulate photochemical
reactions between the organics and hydrogen peroxide em-
ployed as a chemical oxidant, causing photooxidation and/or
phototransformation of the toxic species to carbon dioxide,
water and the corresponding halogenated acid. The photo-

chemical reaction is capable of producing the complete de-
struction of low to moderate concentrations of toxic organics
in water. Optimum conditions for the complete destruction of
several different classes of compounds were developed and
demonstrated in the laboratory.

Specifications: Sponsored by Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab.
5Bp,

Subject index keywords: Water pollution control, Organic
compounds, Oxidation, Photochemical reactions, Superfund
Innovative Technology Evaluation Program, Laser induced
reactions.

1592 SITE Program Demonstration of the SBP
Technologies, Inc., Membrane Filtration System on
Creosote-Contaminated Water

Order Number PB93-228567CDH, price: PC A02/MF A01
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab.; Science Applications
International Corp., Hackensack, NJ; C1993
The formed-in-place membrane filtration system offered by
SBP Technologies, Inc. of Stone Mountain, GA was evaluat-
ed by the USEPA SITE Program. The SITE Program Demon-
stration was accomplished at the American Creosote Works
site in Pensacola, FL in October 1991. The system effective-
ly performed an 82% volume reduction, and removed greater
than 95% of higher molecular weight PAHs and 92% of total
PAHs from the permeate stream. The permeate stream
SVOC concentration averaged 22.8 mg/L over the six-day
period. This stream was determined to be acceptable for dis-
charge to the local POTW, The membrane system tested
was not very effective at removing lower molecular weight
compounds (ca. 18%) such as phenolics. Of the total SVOCs
present, ca. 75% removals were achieved. For each 2000
gallons treated, ca. 200 gallons of wash water were utilized;
ca. 8% of contaminants were distributed to the washwater.
Estimates of capital and operating costs are between $202
and $675 per 1000 gallons treated (not including costs of
final disposal).

Specifications: Pub. in Jnl. of the Air and Waste Manage-
ment Association, v43 n3 p367-370 Mar 93. Prepared in co-
operation with Science Applications International Corp.,
Hackensack, NJ. 7p.

Subject index keywords: Superfund, Membranes, Filtration,
Water pollution control, SITE(Superfund Innovative Technolo-
gy Evaluation).

1593 Technology Evaluation Report SITE Program
Demonstration, Resources Conservation Company,

Basic Extractive Sludge Treatment (B.E.S.T. (Trade
Name)), Grand Calumet River, Gary, Indiana. Volume 1

Order Number PB93-227122CDH, price: PC A08/MF A02
Science Applications International Corp., McLean, VA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Jul 93

312

-------
TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION:

Surface Water & Sludge Treatment Technologies

polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were achieved for Sedi-
ment A, Contaminant concentration reductions of greater
than 99 percent for total PAHs and greater than 99 percent
for total PCBs were achieved for Sediment B. Removal effi-
ciencies in excess of 98 percent were realized for both sedi-
ments for oil and grease (O&G).

Specifications: Also available in set of 4 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB93-227114, See also Volume 2, Part 1, PB93-
227130. Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, OH, Risk Reduction Engineering Lab, 154p.
Subject index keywords: Pollution control, Solvent extrac-
tion, Superfund.

1594 Technology Evaluation Report. SITE Program
Demonstration, Resources Conservation Company,

Basic Extractive Sludge Treatment (B.E.S.T. (Trade
Name)), Grand Calumet River, Gary, Indiana. Volume 2.
Part 1

Order Number PB93-227130CDH, price: PC A24/MF A04
Science Applications International Corp., McLean, VA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Jul 93

The report summarizes the findings of an evaluation of the
Basic Extractive Sludge Treatment (B.E.S.T.) solvent extrac-
tion technology developed by Resources Conservation Com-
pany (RCC). [During the demonstration test, the B.E.S.T.
system was used to treat composited sediments from two
areas of the Grand Calumet River. Contaminant concentra-
tion reductions of 96 percent for total polynuclear aromatic
hydrocarbons (PAHs) and greater than 99 percent for total
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were achieved for Sedi-
ment A. Contaminant concentration reductions of greater
than 99 percent for total PAHs and greater than 99 percent
for total PCBs were achieved for Sediment B. Removal effi-
ciencies in excess of 98 percent were realized for both sedi-
ments for oil and grease (O&G).

Specifications: Also available in set of 4 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB93-227114, See also Volume 1, PB93-227122
and Volume 2, Part 2, PB93-227148. Sponsored by Environ-
mental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction
Engineering Lab. 556p.

Subject Index keywords: Pollution control, Solvent extrac-
tion, Superfund.

1595 Technology Evaluation Report. SITE Program
Demonstration, Resources Conservation Company,

Basic Extractive Sludge Treatment (B.E.S.T. (Trade
Name)), Grant Calumet River, Gary, Indiana. Volume 2.
Part 2

Order Number PB93-227148CDH, price: PC$119.00
Science Applications International Corp., McLean, VA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Jul 93

The report summarizes the findings of an evaluation of the
Basic Extractive Sludge Treatment (B.E.S.T.) solvent extrac-
tion technology developed by Resources Conservation Com-

pany (RCC). During the demonstration test, the B.E.S.T.
system was used to treat composited sediments from two
areas of the Grand Calumet River. Contaminant concentra-
tion reductions of 96 percent for total polynuclear aromatic
hydrocarbons (PAHs) and greater than 99 percent for total
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were achieved for Sedi-
ment A. Contaminant concentration reductions of greater
than 99 percent for total PAHs and greater than 99 percent
for total PCBs were achieved for Sediment B. Removal effi-
ciencies in excess of 98 percent were realized for both sedi-
ments for oil and grease (O&G).

Specifications: Also available in set of 4 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB93-227114. See also Volume 2, Part 1, PB93-
227130 and Volume 2, Part 3, PB93-227155. Sponsored by
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Re-
duction Engineering Lab. 726p.

Subject index keywords: Pollution control, Solvent extrac-
tion, Superfund.

1596 Technology Evaluation Report. SITE Program
Demonstration, Resources Conservation Company,

Basic Extractive Sludge Treatment (B.E.S.T. (Trade
Name)), Grand Calumet River, Gary, Indiana. Volume 2.
Part 3

Order Number PB93-227155CDH, price: PC A11/MF A03
Science Applications International Corp., McLean, VA.;
Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk
Reduction Engineering Lab; Jul 93

Specifications: Also available in set of 4 reports PC E99/
MF E99, PB93-227114. See also Volume 2, Part 2, PB93-
227148. Sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency,
Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. 230p.
Subject Index keywords: Pollution control, Solvent extrac-
tion, Superfund.

313

-------
-------
Subject Index

-------
Subject Index Sample Entry

Documents in this index are listed alphabetically
under various subjects.

Subject Heading Acetic Acid

Title Health Effects Assessment for 2,4,5-Trichlorophenoxy Acedic

Acid (2,4,5-T)

Reference number gee 1050

-------
SUBJECT INDEX

90 DAY STUDY

Management Review of the Superfund Pro-
gram: Implementation Plan.

See 0102
ABANDONED SITES

Evaluation of Cleanup Levels for Remedial
Action at CERCLA {Comprehensive Environ-
mental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) Sites Based on a Review of EPA
{Environmental Protection Agency) Records
of Decision.

See 1245
ABSORPTION {BIOLOGY)

Extraction of Mercury from Groundwater
Using immobilized Algae.

See 1450
ACETIC ACID

Health Effects Assessment for 2,4,5-Trichlor-
ophenoxy Acetic Acid (2,4,5-T).

See 1050
ACETONE

Updated Health Effects Assessment for Ace-
tone.

See 1080
ACID MINE DRAINAGE

Handbook for Constructed Wetlands Receiv-
ing Acid Mine Drainage.

See 1586
ACID VOLATILE SULFIDES

Acid Volatile Sulfide Predicts the Acute Tox-
icity of Cadmium and Nickel in Sediments.
See 1572
ADIPOSE TISSUE

identification of SARA (Superfund Amend-
ments and Reauthorization Act) Compounds
in Adipose Tissue.

See 1055
ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL

Authorization for Regional Administrators to
Approve Consistency Exemptions at NPL
Sites.

See 0998
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Presumptive Remedies: Policy and Proce-
dures.

See 1103

Superfund Administrative Improvements:
Reinventing Superfund.

See 0312
AEROBIC PROCESSES

Evaluation and Testing of a Protocol to De-
termine the Aerobic Degradation Potential of
Hazardous Waste Constituents in Soii.
See 1503

Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Aerobic Biodegradation
Remedy Screening,

See 1156

Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Aerobic Biodegradation
Remedy Screening, interim Guidance.
See 1157

Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Aerobic Biodegradation
Remedy Screening. Quick Reference Fact
Sheet.

See 1158
AIR ACTION LEVELS

Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Evaluation of Short-Term Air
Action Levels for Superfund Sites.

See 1886
AIR FLOW

in situ Soil Vapor Extraction Treatment.
See 1511

AIR FORCE FACILITIES

Installation Restoration Program Technical
Support Document for Record of Decision,
Tataiina Air Force Station LRRS Site.
See 1277
AIR PATHWAY ANALYSIS

Engineering Bulletin: Air Pathway Analysis.
See 1404
AIR POLLUTION

Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Development of Example Pro-
cedures for Evaluating the Air Impacts of
Soil Excavation Associated with Superfund
Remedial Actions.

See 1380

Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Emission Factors for Super-
fund Remediation Technologies.

See 1381

Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Volume 1. Application of Air
Pathway Analyses for Superfund Activities.
See 1390

Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Volume 2. Estimation of Base-
line Air Emissions at Superfund Sites {Re-
vised).

See 1392

Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Volume 4. Procedures for Dis-
persion Modeling and Air Monitoring for Su-
perfund Air Pathway Analysis.

See 1394

Engineering Bulletin: Air Pathway Analysis.
See 1404

Environmental Asbestos Assessment
Manual, Superfund Method for the Determi-
nation of Asbestos in Ambient Air. Part 1.
Method.

See 1027

Environmental Asbestos Assessment
Manual. Superfund Method for the Determi-
nation of Asbestos In Ambient Air. Part 2.
Technical Background Document.

See 1028

Estimating VOC Emissions from Superfund
Sites in the Houston-Galveston Texas Area.
(NNEMS Project No. 1302).

See 1406

Evaluation of Portable Gas Chromatography.
See 1479

Guidance on Applying the Data Quality Ob-
jectives Process for Ambient Air Monitoring
Around Superfund Sites (Stage 3).

See 0987

Guidance on Applying the Data Quality Ob-
jectives Process lor Ambient Air Monitoring
Around Superfund Sites (Stages 1 and 2).
See 0988

Superfund Guide: Clean Air Act Hazardous
Air Pollutants Added to the List of CERCLA
Hazardous Substances.

See 1151
AIR POLLUTION ABATEMENT

Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Estimation of Air Impacts for
Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE) Systems.
See 1383

ARARs Fact Sheet Compliance with the
Clean Air Act and Associated Air Quality Re-
quirements.

See 0397

SITE Demonstration of the American Com-
bustion Pyretron Oxygen-Enhanced Burner.
See 1299
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL

Air Stripping of Aqueous Solutions. Engineer-
ing Bulletin.

See 1371

Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Models for Estimating Air
Emission Rates from Superfund Remedial
Actions.

See 1388

CERCLA Removal Actions at Methane Re-
lease Sites.

See 0418

Contingency Analysis Modeling for Super-
fund Sites and Other Sources.

See 1219

Control of Air Emissions from Materials Han-
dling during Remediation. Engineering Bulle-
tin.

See 1398

Demonstration of a Trial Excavation at the
McColl Superfund Site.

See 1228

Evaluation of Emission Factors for Formal-
dehyde from Certain Wood Processing Oper-
ations. Final Report, May-August 1989.
See 1410

Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
Incineration Research Facility: Annual
Report for FY91.

See 1484

Pilot-Scale Incineration of Contaminated Soii
from the Chemical Insecticide Corporation
Superfund Site.

See 1523

Control of Transient Incinerator Emissions
with an Oxygen Based Combustion System.
See 1401

Engineered Biofilter for Removing Organic
Contaminants in Air.

See 1403

Foam Scrubbing (Chapter 9).

See 1411

Incineration Treatment of Arsenic-Contami-
nated Soil.

See 1268

Pilot-Scale Incinerability Evaluation of Ar-
ssnic-and Lead-Contaminated Soils from
Two Superlund Sites.

See 1288

Site Emerging Technologies: Bioscrubbsr for
Removing Hazardous Organic Emissions
from Soil, Water and Air Decontamination
Processes.

See 1302

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL EQUIPMENT

Control of Air Emissions from Superfund Air
Strippers at Superfund Groundwater Sites.
See 1399

Control of Air Emissions from Superfund

Sites.

See 1400

Incineration Data on Arsenic and Lead Emis-
sions.

See 1267

Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
Incineration Research Facility: Annual
Report for FY89.

See 1482

Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
Incineration Research Facility: Annual
Report for FY90.

See 1483

Potential Surrogate Metals for Incinerator
Trial Burns.

See 1486

SITE Demonstration of the American Com-
bustion Pyretron Oxygen-Enhanced Burner.
See 1299

SU-1

-------
AIR POLLUTION DETECTION

SUBJECT INDEX

AIR POLLUTION DETECTION

Compendium of ERT Field Analytical Proce-
dures.

See 0902

Canrstw-Based Method for Monitoring Toxic
VOCs In Ambient Atr.

See 1396

Superfund Innovative Technology Evalua-
tion: The Delaware SITE Study, 1989,
See 1322

Us© ot a Fourier Transform Spectrometer as
a Remote Sensor at Superfund Sites.
See 1365
AIR POLLUTION DISPERSION

Comparison of a Revised Area Source Algo-
rithm lor the Industrial Source Complex
Short Term Model and Wind Tunnel Data.
See 1216

Instructional Package on Regulatory Air
Quality Modeling. Part 1; Videos on the
"Guideline on Air Quality Models (Revised)'
and the Model Clearinghouse (Video).
See 1412

AIR POLLUTION EFFECTS (HUMANS)

Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Series. Superfund Air Pathway Analyses
Review Criteria Checklists.

See 1372

Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series; Estimation of Air Impacts for
Air Stripping of Contaminated Water.
See 1382
AIR POLLUTION MONITORING

Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Contingency Plans at Super-
fund Sites Using Air Monitoring.

See 1378

Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Evaluation of Short-Term Air
Action Levels lor Superfund Sites.

See 1386

Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Volume 1. Overview of Air
Pathway Assessments for Superfund Sites
(Revised).

See 1391

Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Volume 4. Guidance lor Ambi-
ent Air Monitoring at Superfund Sites (Re-
vised).

See 1393

Assessing Potential Indoor Air Impacts for
Superfund Sites. Air/Superfund National
Technical Guidance Study Series.

See 1395

Field Standard Operating Procedures for Air
Surveillance F.S.O.P. No. 8.

See 0910

Canister-Based Method for Monitoring Toxic
VOCs in Ambient Air.

See 1396

Personnel Protection through Reconnais-
sance Robotics at Superfund Remedial
Sites.

See 1286
AIR POLLUTION MONITORS

Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series; Applicability of Open Path
Monitors for Superfund.

$©© 1375

Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Compilation of Information on
Real-Time Air Monitoring for Use at Super-
fund Sites.

See 1377

Personal Air Sampling and Air Monitoring
Requirements under 29 CFR 1910.120.
See 0922

AIR POLLUTION SAMPLING

Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Series. Superfund Air Pathway Analyses
Review Criteria Checklists.

See 1372

Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Sludy Series. Air Emissions from Area
Sources: Estimating Soil and Soil-Gas
Sample Number Requirements.

See 1373

Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Database of Emission Rate
Measurement Projects.

See 1379

Air Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Estimation of Air Impacts for
the Excavation of Contaminated Soil.
See 1384

Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Guideline for Predictive Base-
line Emissions Estimation Procedures for Su-
perfund Sites.

See 1387

Air Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Screening Procedures for Esti-
mating the Air Impacts of Incineration at Su-
perfund Sites.

See 1389

Compendium of ERT Air Sampling Proce-
dures.

See 0901

Design Considerations for Ambient Air Moni-
toring at Superfund Sites. Engineering Bulle-
tin.

See 1402

Measurement of Volatile Organic Com-
pounds during Start-up of Bioremediation of
French Limited Superfund Site in Crosby
Texas Using Wind Dependent Whole-Air
Sampling.

See 1414

Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
Incineration Research Facility: Annual
Report for FY89.

See 1482

Comparison: Organic Emissions from Haz-
ardous Waste Incinerators versus the 1990
Toxics Release inventory Air Releases.
See 1217

Review and Evaluation of Area Source Dis-
persion Algorithms for Emission Sources at
Superfund Sites.

See 1416

Sector Sampling for VOC's during Remedi-
ation of Superfund Site at Shaver's Farm,
Georgia.

See 1417

Superfund Innovative Technology Evalua-
tion: The Delaware SITE Study, 1989.
See 1322
AIR QUALITY

Review and Evaluation of Area Source Dis-
persion Algorithms for Emission Sources at
Superfund Sites.

See 1416
AIR SAMPLERS

Canister-Based Method for Monitoring Toxic
VOCs in Ambient Air.

See 1396
AIR SPARGING

Gitizen's Guide to Air Sparging.

See 0452
AIR STRIPPING

Air Stripping of Aqueous Solutions. Engineer-
ing Bulletin.

See 1371
ALABAMA

National Priorities List Sites; Alabama.
See 0148

National Priorities list Sites: Alabama.
See 0149

National Priorities List Sites: Alabama, 1902,
See 01S0

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.

See 0621

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP listing by Site for Alabama.

See 0622

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.

See 0623

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.

See 0833
ALASKA

National Priorities List Sites: Alaska.

See 0151

National Priorities List Sites: Alaska,
See 0152

National Priorities List Sites: Alaska, 1992.
See 0163
ALGAE

Extraction of Mercury from Groundwater
Using Immobilized Algae.

See 1450
ALGASORB

Extraction of Mercury from Groundwater
Using Immobilized Algae.

Sea 1450
ALGORITHMS

Comparison of a Revised Area Source Algo-
rithm for the Industrial Source Complex
Short Term Model and Wind Tunnel Data,
See 1216

ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACT
STRATEGY

ARCS (Alternative Remedial Contract Strate-
gy) Contracts Users' Manual.

See 0019

ARCS Work Assignment Management Field

Guide.

See 0021

ALTERNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING
STRATEGY

Initiatives to Streamline the Alternative Re-
medial Contracting Strategy (ARCS) Con-
tracts' Award Fee Process.

See 0033

Performance Tracking under ARCS Con-

Iracts.

See 0061

ALTRNATIVE REMEDIAL CONTRACTING
STRATEGY

Use of Time and Materials and Cost Reim-
bursement Subcontracts for Remedial Ac-
tions under the Alternative Remedial Con-
tracting Strategy Contracts.

See 1141
ALUMINIUM

Draft Record of Decision for the Aluminum
Smelter Conservation/Modernization Pro-
gram.

See 1087
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY

Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Estimation of Air Impacts from
Area Sources of Particulate Matter Emis-
sions at Superfund Sites.

See 1385

Estimation of Air Impacts lor Bioventing Sys-
tems Used at Superfund Sites. Air/Super-
fund National Technical Guidance Study
Series,

See 1407

SU-2

-------
SUBJECT INDEX

ASSESSMENTS

Estimation of Air Impacts for Solidification
and Stabilization Processes Used at Super-
fund Sites. Air/Superlund National Technical
Guidance Study Series,

See 1408

Estimation of Air Impacts for Thermal De-
sorption Units Used at Superfund Sites. Air/
Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series.

See 1409
AMERICAN INDIANS

Revised Interim Final Guidance on Indian In-
volvement in the Superfund Program,
See 0484
AMERICAN SAMOA

National Priorities List Sites; American
Samoa, Guam, and the Trust Territories.
See 0154

National Priorities List Sites: The United
States Territories, 1992.

See 027S

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for American Samoa.
Sea 0624

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for American Samoa.
See 0626
AMPHIBIA

Evaluating Amphibian Responses in Wet-
lands Impacted by Mining Activities in the
Western United States.

See 1586
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY

Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version

2) (for Microcomputers).

See 0036

Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version

3) (for Microcomputers).

See 003?

Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software (SOW March
1990) (Version 1) (for Microcomputers).
See 0040

Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System Software for the PC (SOW March
1990 Version 1). User Manual.

See 0041

Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Ver-
sion 3) (for Microcomputers).

See 0050

Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (SOW February
1988) (for Microcomputers).

See 0054

Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (SOW March
1990) (Version 1) (for Microcomputers).
See 0055

Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (SOW OLM01.8
Version January 1992) (Version 1) (for
Microcomputers).

See 0056

Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System. Software for the PC (OLM01.8 Ver-
sion 1), User Manual.

See 0057

Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System. Software for the PC (SOW March
1990, Version 1). User Manual.

See 0059

Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System, Software for the PC (Version June
1990). User Manual.

See 0060

ANNELIDS

On-Site Methods for Assessing Chemical
Impact on the Soli Environment Using Earth-
worms: A Case Study at the Baird and
McGuire Superfund Site, Holbrook, Massa-
chusetts.

See 1521
APPLICABLE OR RELEVANT AND
APPROPRIATE REGULATIONS

PAST: The Potential ARARs Selection Tool.
See 0434
APPLICABLE OR RELEVANT AND
APPROPRIATE REQUIREMENTS

ARARs Q's and A's: State Ground-Water
Antidegradation Issues.

See 0402

ARARs Q's and A's: The Fund-Balancing

Waiver.

See 0403

AQUADETOX/SVE TREATMENT SYSTEM

AWD Technologies Integrated AquaDetox
(Trade Name)/SVE Technology: Applications
Analysis Report.

See 1202

U.S. EPA SITE Demonstration of AWD Tech-
nologies" AquaDetox/SVE System.

See 1363
AQUIFERS

Measurement of Hydraulic Conductivity Dis-
tributions: A Manual of Practice.

See 1467

New Approach and Methodologies for Char-
acterizing the Hydrogeologic Properties of
Aquifers.

See 1470
ARIZONA

National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and

Nevada.

See 0157

National Priorities list Sites: Arizona and
Nevada, 1992.

See 0158

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.

See 0627

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.

See 0628

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.

See 0629
ARKANSAS

National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas.
See 0159

National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas.
See 0160

National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas, 1992.
See 0161

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.

See 0630

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.

See 0631

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.

See 0632

Superfund at Work; Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Old Mid-
land Products Site Profile, Yell County, Ar-
kansas).

See 0957
ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS

EPA/USACE Payment Process: Direct Cite/
Revised Reimbursement Methods.

See 1126

AROMATIC COMPOUNDS

Chemical Dehalogenation Treatment: APEG

Treatment.

See 1210

Control of Aromatic Waste Air Streams by
Soil Bioreactors,

See 1496

AROMATIC POLYCYCUC HYDROCARBONS

Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram. CF Systems Organics Extraction
System, New Bedford, Massachusetts.
Volume 1.

See 1346

Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram, CF Systems Organics Extraction
System, New Bedford, Massachusetts.
Volume 2.

See 1347
ARSENIC

Incineration Data on Arsenic and Lead Emis-
sions.

See 1267

Behavior of Arsenic hi a Rotary Kiln Inciner-
ator (Journal Version).

See 1204

Superfund Fact Sheet Arsenic.

See 0488
ASBESTOS

Environmental Asbestos Assessment
Manual. Superfund Method for the Determi-
nation of Asbestos in Ambient Air. Part 1.
Method.

See 1027

Environmental Asbestos Assessment
Manual. Superfund Method for the Determi-
nation of Asbestos In Ambient Air. Part 2.
Technical Background Document.

See 1028

Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1993 (Johns-
Manville Site Profile, Illinois).

See 0952
ASSESSMENT MONITORING

CERCLA Off-Site Policy - Eligibility of Facili-
ties in Assessment Monitoring.

See 0414
ASSESSMENTS

CERCUS Characterization Project National

Results.

See 0001

CERCLIS Characterization Project Region 1

Results.

See 0002

CERCLIS Characterization Project; Region 2

Results.

See 0003

CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 3

Results.

Sea 0004

CERCLIS Characterization Project; Region 4

Results.

See 0005

CERCUS Characterization Project: Region 5

Results.

See 0006

CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 6

Results.

See 0007

CERCLIS Characterization Project Region 7

Results.

See 0008

CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 8

Results.

See 0009

CERCLIS Characterization Project; Region 9

Results.

See 0010

SU-3

-------
ATMOSPHERIC DIFFUSION

SUBJECT INDEX

CERCLIS Characterization Project; Region
10 Results.

See 0011

ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 5, August
1992. Briefing the BTAG: Initial Description
of Setting, History, and Ecology of a Site.
See 1023

Guidance for Performing Preliminary Assess-
ments under CERCLA
See 0342

PA Review Checklist
See 0366
ATMOSPHERIC DIFFUSION

Review and Evaluation ot Area Source Dis-
persion Algorithms for Emission Sources at
Superfund Sites.

See 1416
AUDITING

Audit Management Process. Reference

Guide.

See 0085

Audits and the Superfund Program Manager.
See 0086

Audits arid the Superfund Program Manager.
See 0087

Health and Safety Audit Guidelines: SARA
Title I, Section 126.

See 0916

Involvement of Superfund Program Manag-
ers in Superfund Response Agreement
Audits.

See 0099

SRIS System Overview and User's Guide.
See 0112
AUTHORIZATIONS

Authorization for Regional Administrators to
Approve Consistency Exemptions at NPL
Sites.

See 0998
AUTOMOUSE SYSTEM

AutoMOUSE: An Improvement to the
MOUSE Computerized Uncertainty Analysis
System Operational Manual.

See 1201
B AND W CYCLONE FURNACE

Babcock and Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrifi-
cation, Technology Demonstration Summary.
See 1203
BASINS (GEOGRAPHIC)

Dealing with Toxic Polluted Sediments in the
Great Lakes Basin.

See 1582
BEN MODEL

BEN: A Model to Calculate the Economic
Benefit of Noncompliance. User's Manual.
See 0513
BENCH-SCALE EXPERIMENTS

Toxicity Bioassay and Eluate Heavy Metals
Analysis Results of the Bench Scale Stabili-
zation Study of Soils from the United
Chrome Superfund NPL (National Priority
List) Site Corvallis, Oregon.

See 154$

BENEFIT COST ANALYSIS

BEN: A Model to Calculate the Economic
Benefit of Noncompliance. User's Manual.
See 0513

BEN: A Model to Calculate the Economic
Benefits of Noncompliance. User's Manual
(Revised).

See 1205

BEN Model: Calculates Violators' Economic
Benefits from Noncompliance (Version 4.0)
(for Microcomputers).

See 0514
BENZENE

Superfund Fact Sheet: Benzene.

See 0489

BENZENES

Health Effects Assessment for Benzene.
See 1035
BENZOFLUORANTHENE

Toxicological Profile tor

Benzo(b)Fluofanthene.

See 1360
BEST TECHNOLOGY

Guidance Documents Relating to landfills
and Contaminants.

See 1259

Innovative Technology: BEST Solvent Ex-
traction Process.

See 1270
BIBLIOGRAPHIES

Bibliography of Federal Reports and Publica-
tions Describing Alternative and Innovative
Treatment Technologies for Corrective
Action and Site Remediation,

See 1206

Literature Survey of Innovative Technologies
for Hazardous Waste Site Remediation,
1987-1991.

See 1281

OSWER Source Book. Volume 1. Training
and Technology Transfer Resources, 1992-
1993.

See 1284

OSWER Source Book. Volume 2. Training
and Technology Transfer Resources, 1992-
1993.

See 1285
BIOASSAY

Application of Tradescant a Micronuceus
Assay for in situ Evaluation of Potential Ge-
netic Hazards from Exposure to Chemicals
at a Wood-Preserving Site.

See 1195

Toxicological Implementations of Remediat-
ing Hazardous Wastes.

See 1359
BIODEGRADATION

Control of Aromatic Waste Air Streams by
Soil Bioreactors.

See 1498
BIODETERIORAT10N

Evaluation and Testing of a Protocol to De-
termine the Aerobic Degradation Potential of
Hazardous Waste Constituents In Soil.
See 1503

Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Aerobic Biodegradatton
Remedy Screening.

See 1156

Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Aerobic Biodegradatton
Remedy Screening. Interim Guidance.
See 1157

Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Aerobic Biodegradatton
Remedy Screening. Quick Reference Fact
Sheet.

See 1158

Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Biodegradation Remedy Se-
lection. Quick Reference Fact Sheet
See 1160

Innovative Technology: Slurry-Phase Biode-
gradation.

See 1271

Biodegradatton of Creosote and Pentachlor-
ophenol in Contaminated Groundwater:
Chemical and Biological Assessment.
See 1432

Respirometric Methods for Determination of
Biodegradability and Biodegradation Kinetics
tor Hazardous Organic Pollutant Com-
pounds.

See 1427

Slurry Biodegradation.

See 1428
BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS

Biological Assessment of Toxicity Caused by
Chemical Constituents Eluted from Site Soils
Collected at the Drake Chemical Superfund
Site, Lock Haven, Clinton Co., Pennsylvania
See 1491

Evaluation of Terrestrial Indicators for Use in
Ecological Assessments at Hazardous
Waste Sites.

See 1249

Health Effects Assessment
Tables.

See 1051

Health Effects Assessment
Tables.

See 1052

Health Effects Assessment
Tables.

See 1053

Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables
Fourth Quarter FY 1989.

See 1054

Application of Tradescantia Micronucteus
Assay for In situ Evaluation of Potential Ge-
netic Hazards from Exposure to Chemicals
at a Wood-Preserving Site.

See 1195

Development and Use of Site-Specific
Chemical and Biological Criteria for Assess-
ing New Bedford Harbor Pilot Dredging
Project.

See 1583
BIOLOGICAL INDICATORS

On-Site Methods to Assessing Chemical
Impact on the Soil Environment Using Earth-
worms: A Case Study at the Baird and
McGuire Superfund Site, Holbrook, Massa-
chusetts.

See 1521
BIOLOGICAL INDUSTRIAL WASTE
TREATMENT

EPA SITE Demonstration oi the BioTrol Soil
Washing Process.

See 1502
BIOLOGICAL MARKERS

Evaluation of Exposure Markers.

See 1246
BIOLOGICAL RECOVERY

Emerging Technologies: Bio-Recovery Sys-
tems Removal and Recovery of Metal Ions
from Groundwater.

See 1439

Emerging Technologies: Bio-Recovery Sys-
tems Removal and Recovery of Metal Ions
from Groundwater. Appendices.

See 1440

BIOLOGICAL TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
GROUPS

ECO Update: The Role of BTAGs in Ecologi-
cal Assessment. Volume 1, Number 1, Sep-
tember 1991.

See 1020
BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT

Alternative Biological Treatment Processes
for Remediation of Creosote-and PCP-Con-
taminated Materials: Bench-Scale Treatabil-
ity Studies.

See 1418

Bioremediation: An Information Update on
Applying Bioremediation to Site Cleanup.
See 1421

Summary
Summary
Summary

SU-4

-------
SUBJECT INDEX

CERCLA

Bioremediation in the Field. An Information
Update on Applying Bioremediation to Ste
Clean-Up. Number 3.

See 1422

Bioremediation in the Field: An Information
Update on Applying Bioremediation to Site
Cleanup. (Number 4).

See 1423

Bioremediation in the Re Id: Number 1, No-
vember 1980.

See 1424

BioTrol Soil Washing System for Treatment
of a Wood Preserving Site: Applications
Analysis Report.

See 1492

Evaluation and Testing of a Protocol to De-
termine the Aerobic Degradation Potential of
Hazardous Waste Constituents in Soil.
See 1503

In-sltu Bioremediation of Contaminated
Ground Water.

See 1465

Measurement of Volatile Organic Com-
pounds during Start-Up of Bioremediation of
French Limited Superfund Site in Crosby
Texas Using Wind Dependent Whole-Air
Sampling.

See 1414

Bench-Scale Evaluation of Alternative Bio-
logical Treatment Processes for the Remedi-
ation of Pentachlorophenol- and Creosote-
Contaminated Materials: Slurry-Phase Biore-
mediation.

Sea 1419

Bench-Scale Evaluation of Alternative Bio-
logical Treatment Processes for the Remedi-
ation of Pentachlorophenol- and Creosote-
Contaminated Materials: Solid-Phase Biore-
mediation.

See 1420

Biodegradation of Creosote and Pentachlor-
ophenol in Contaminated Groundwater:
Chemical and Biological Assessment.
See 1432

EPA Site Demonstration of BioTrol Aqueous
Treatment System.

See 1441

Extraction of Mercury from Groundwater
Using Immobilized Algae.

See 1450

Respirometrlc Methods tor Determination of
Biodegradability and Biodegradation Kinetics
for Hazardous Organic Pollutant Com-
pounds.

See 1427

Rotating Biological Contactors. Engineering

Bulletin.

See 129?

Technology Evaluation Report: Biotrol Soil
Washing System for Treatment of a Wood
Preserving Site. Volume 1.

See 1539

technology Evaluation Report: Biotrol Soil
Washing System for Treatment of a Wood
Preserving Site. Volume 2, Part A.

See 1540

Technology Evaluation Report: Biotrol Soil
Washing System for Treatment of a Wood
Preserving Site. Volume 2, Part B.

See 1541

Technology Evaluation Report: Pilot-Scale
Demonstration of a Slurry-Phase Biological
Reactor for Creosote-Contaminated Soil.
Volume 1.

See 1542

Technology Evaluation Report: Toronto Har-
bour Commissioners (THC) Soil Recycle
Treatment Train.

See 1643

Understanding Bioremediation: A Guidebook
for Citizens.

See 0507

BIOREACTORS

On-Site Engineering Report of the Slurry-
Phase Biological Reactor for Pilot-Scale
Testing on Contaminated Soil.

See 1520
BIOREMEDIATION

Bioremediation in the Field: An Information
Update on Applying Bioremediation to Site
Cleanup. (Number 4).

See 1423

Bioremediation Resource Guide and Biore-
mediation Resource Matrix.

See 1425

Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Biodegradation Remedy Se-
lection. Interim Guidance,

Sea 1158

In situ Bioremediation of Contaminated Un-
saturated Subsurface Soils.

See 1509

Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (French
Limited Site Profile, Harris County, Texas).
See 0954

Use of Office of Research and Develop-
ment's Bioremediation Expertise in Super-
fund Removal Program.

See 1016

BIOTROL AQUEOUS TREATMENT SYSTEM

EPA ate Demonstration of BioTrol Aqueous
Treatment System.

See 1441

EPA SITE Demonstration of the BioTrol Soil
Washing Process.

See 1502
BIOTROL SOIL WASHERS

BioTrol Soil Washing System for Treatment
of a Wood Preserving Site: Applications
Analysis Report.

See 1492

EPA SITE Demonstration of the BioTrol Soil
Washing Process.

See 1502
BIOTROL SOIL WASH INS SYSTEM

Technology Demonstration Summary: Bio
Trol Soil Washing System for Treatment of a
Wood Preserving Site.

See 1538

Technology Evaluation Report: Biotrol Soil
Washing System for Treatment of a Wood
Preserving Site. Volume 1.

See 1539

Technology Evaluation Report: Biotrol Soil
Washing System for Treatment of a Wood
Preserving Site. Volume 2, Part A.

See 1540

Technology Evaluation Report: Biotrol Soil
Washing System for Treatment of a Wood
Preserving Site. Volume 2, Part B.

See 1541
BIOVENTING

Estimation of Air Impacts for Bioventing Sys-
tems Used at Superfund Sites. Afr/Super-
fund National Technical Guidance Study
Series.

See 1407
BOSTON (MASSACHUSETTS)

Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993
(Common Steps in the Removal Process).
See 0965
BOTTLE REPOSITORIES

Decentralization of Superfund Bottle Reposi-
tory Functions.

See 0985
BOTTOM SEDIMENTS

Handbook: Responding to Discharges of
Sinking Hazardous Substances.

See 1589

BRANT (NEW YORK)

Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Wide
Beach Section of Brant, New York}.
See 0948
BULLITT COUNTY (KENTUCKY)

Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Valley of
the Drums, Bullitt County, Kentucky).
See 0947
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Assistance to
the Superfund Program.

See 1138
BUSINESSES

CERCLA Off-Site Policy - Eligibility of Facili-
ties in Assessment Monitoring.

See 0414
CADMIUM

Health Effects Assessment for Cadmium.
See 1036

Acid Volatile Sulfide Predicts the Acute Tox-
icity of Cadmium and Nickel in Sediments.
See 1572
CALIFORNIA

National Priorities List Sites: California.
See 0162

National Priorities List Sites: California and

Hawaii.

See 0163

National Priorities List Sites: California and
Hawaii, 1992.

See 0164

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for California
See 0633

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for California.

See 0634

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for California.

See 0635
CANS

Canister-Based Method for Monitoring Toxic
VOCs in Ambient Air.

See 1396
CAPACITY

CERCLA Waste Capacity Assurance.
See 0131
CAPACITY ASSURANCE PLANS

Guidance for Capacity Assurance Planning.
Capacity Planning Pursuant to CERCLA Sec-
tion 104(c)(9).

See 0137
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE

Health Effects Assessment for Carbon Tet-
rachloride.

See 1037
CARVER-GREENFIELD PROCESS

Carver-Greenfield Process (Trade Name)
Dehydro-Tech Corporation. Applications
Analysis Report.

See 1207
CASE STUDIES

Procedural Guidance on Treatment of Insur-
ers under CERCLA.

See 0589
CASHOUT SETTLEMENTS

Interim Cashout Settlement Procedures.
See 0558
CERCLA

CERCLA/Superfund Orientation Manual.
See 0130

SU-5

-------
CERCLA (COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL SUBJECT INDEX
RESPONSE COMPENSATION AND LIABILITY ACT)

CERCLA (COMPREHENSIVE
ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE
COMPENSATION AND LIABILITY ACT)

CERCtIS Characterization Project: Region 1

Results.

See 0002

CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 2

Results.

See 0003

CERCLA INFORMATION SYSTEM (CIRCUS)

CERCLIS Characterization Project: National

Results.

See 0001

CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 3

Results.

See 0004

CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 4

Results.

See 0005

CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 5

Results.

See 0006

CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 6

Results.

Sea 0007

CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 7

Results.

See 0008

CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 8

Results.

See 0009

CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 9

Results.

See 0010

CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region
10 Results.

See 0011

CERCLIS (CERCLA INFORMATION SYSTEM)

CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 1

Results.

See 0002

CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 2
Results.

See 0003
CHEMFIX PROCESS

Chemfix Technologies, Inc. Solidification/
Stabilization Process. Application Analysis
Report.

S©e 1551

SITE Demonstration of the CHEMFIX Solidi-
fication/Stabilization Process at the Portable
Equipment Salvage Company Site.

See 1558

Technology Evaluation Report CHEMFIX
Technologies, Inc., Solidification/Stabiliza-
tion Process, Clackamas, Oregon. Volume 2.
See 1339

Technology Evaluation Report Chemfix
Technologies, Inc. Solidification/Stabilization
Process, Clackamas, Oregon. Volume 1.
See 1566
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS

Assessment of Tentatively Identified Corn-
pounds In Superfund Samples.

See 1199

Chemical Dehalogenation Treatability Stud-
ies under CERCLA: An Overview,

See 1153

Environmental Asbestos Assessment
Manual. Superfund Method for the Determi-
nation of Asbestos In Ambient Air. Part 2,
Technical Background Document.

See 1028

International Symposium on Field Screening
Methods for Hazardous Wastes and Toxic
Chemicals (2nd), Proceedings. Held in Las
Vegas, Nevada on February 12-14, 1931.
See 1279

Evaluation of Modifications to Extraction Pro-
cedures Used in Analysis of Environmental
Samples from Superfund Sites.

See 1247

Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram. CF Systems Organics Extraction
System, New Bedford, Massachusetts.
Volume 2.

See 1347

Toxicity Btoassay and Eluate Heavy Metals
Analysis Results of the Bench Scale Stabili-
zation Study of Soils from the United
Chrome Superfund NPL (National Priority
List) Site Corvallls, Oregon.

Sec 1546

USEPA Contract Laboratory Program Nation-
al Functional Guidelines tor Organic Data
Review,

See 007?

User's Guide to the Contract Laboratory Pro-
gram.

See 0079
CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS

Biological Assessment of Toxicity Caused by
Chemical Constituents Eluted from Site Soils
Collected at the Drake Chemical Superfund
Site, Lock Haven, Clinton Co., Pennsylvania.
See 1491
Health Effects
Tables.

See 1051
Health Effects
Tables.

See 1052
Health Effects
Tables.

See 1053

Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables
Fourth Quarter FY 1989.

See 1054

Limited-Use Chemical Protective Clothing for
EPA Superfund Activities.

See 1058

Estimation of the Cost of Using Chemical
Protective Clothing,

See 1244

On-Site Methods for Assessing Chemical
Impact on the Soil Environment Using Earth-
worms: A Case Study at the Baird and
McGwire Superfund Site, Holbrook, Massa-
chusetts.

See 1521
CHEMICAL LABORATORIES

Guidelines for the Cleanup of Clandestine
Drug Laboratories.

See 1007
CHEMICAL PROPERTIES

Superfund Fact Sheet: Arsenic.

See 0488
CHEMICAL SPILLS

Treatment of Nonhazardous Petroleum-Con-
taminated Soils by Thermal Desorption
Technologies.

See 1547
CHEMICAL STABILIZATION

Evaluation of Waste Stabilized by the Solidi-
tech SITE Technology.

See 1654

Soliditech, Inc. SoWfication/StaMization
Process: Applications Analysis Report.
See 1562

Technology Evaluation Report CHEMFIX
Technologies, Inc., Solidification/Stabiliza-
tion Process, Clackamas, Oregon. Volume 2.
See 1339

Technology Evaluation Report: Chemfix
Technologies, Inc. Solidification/Stabilization
Process, Clackamas, Oregon, Volume 1,
See 1566

CHEMICAL TREATMENT

Chemical Dehalogenation Treatment: APEG

Treatment.

See 1210

Chemical Oxidation Treatment. Engineering

Bulletin.

See 1211

Developments in Chemical Treatment .of
Contaminated Soil.

See 1499

Guide lor Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Chemical Dehalogenation.
See 1161

Technology Evaluation Report: Toronto Har-
bour Commissioners (THC) Soil Recycle
Treatment Train.

See 1543
CHEMICAL WASTE SITES

Application of a Plant Test System in the
Identification of Potential Genetic Hazards at
Chemical Waste Sites.

See 1194
CHEMICAL. WASTES

Chemical Waste Management, Inc.
PO'WWfcR (Trade Name) Evaporation-
Catalytic Oxidation Technology. Technology
Evaluation Report, Volume 1.

See 1213

Chemical Waste Management, Inc.
PO'WW'ER (Trade Name) Evaporation-
Catalytic Oxidation Technology. Technology
Evalutfcm Report. Volume 2.

See 1214
CHEMICAL WATER POLLUTANTS

Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program Demonstration Plan for Wasting-
house Bio-Analytic Systems Pentachloro-
phenol Immunoassays.

See 1310
CHLORDANE

Health Effects Assessment for Chlordane.
See 1038
CHLORINE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS

Guidance on Remedial Actions for Super-
fund Sites with PCB Contamination.

See 1260
CHLOROBENZENES

Health Effects Assessment for Chloroben-
zene.

See 1039
CHLOROFORM

Health Effects Assessment for Chloroform.
See 1040
CHLOROMETHANES

Health Effects Assessment for Methylene
Chloride.

See 1043
CHROMATOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS

Evaluation of Commercially-Available Porta-
ble Gas Chromatographs.

See 1478
CHROMIUM

Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (United
Chrome Products Site Profile).

See 0961

Toxicity Bioassay and Eluate Heavy Metals
Analysis Results of the Bench Scale Stabili-
zation Study of Soils from the United
Chrome Superfund NPL (National Priority
List) Site Corvallis, Oregon.

See 1546

Assessment Summary
Assessment Summary
Assessment Summary

SU-6

-------
SUBJECT INDEX

CLEANUP

CHROMIUM PLATING

Use of 'Salenastrum capricornutum1 to
Assess the Toxicity Potential of Surface and
Ground Water Contamination Caused by
Chromium Waste.

See 1367
CIRCULATING BED COMBUSTOH

Technology Evaluation Report: Ogden Circu-
lating Bed Combustor at the McColl Super-
fund Site.

Sea 1344
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION

Citizens' Guidance Manual tor the Technical
Assistance Grant Program.

See 0463

Community Relations: Use of Senior Envi-
ronmental Employees in Superfund (Super-
fund Management Review: Recommendation
43.K.L).

See 0088

Proposed Method to Evaluate the Effective-
ness of Community involvement in Super-
fund {Superfund Management Review: Rec-
ommendation Number 43.A).

See 0109

Role of Community Interviews in the Devel-
opment of a Community Relations Program
for Remedial Response.

See 0485

Superfund Fact Sheet: Public Involvement
See 0493

Superfund: Report of the EPA Superfund
Revitalization Public Meeting Held on June
24,1992. Volumes 1 and 2.

See 0333
CLACKAMAS (OREGON)

Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Technology Demonstration Summary: Cham-
fix Solidification/Stabilization Process, Clack-
amas, Oregon.

See 1564
CLEAN UP

Furthering the Use of Innovative Treatment
Technologies in OSWER Programs.
See 12S6
CLEAN-UP OPERATIONS

Terra Vac In situ Vacuum Extraction System:
Applications Analysis Report
See 1356
CLEANING

Specifications and Guidance for Contami-
nant-Free Sample Containers.

See 0994
CLEANUP

Bioremediation in the Field: An Information
Update on Applying Bioremediation to Site
Cleanup. (Number 4).

See 1423

Cleanup Information Bulletin Board System
Users Guide. {CLU-IN: Cleanup Information
Bulletin Board).

See 1215

Conducting Non-Time-Critical Removal Ac-
tions under CERCLA.

See 0999

Covenants Not to Sue under SARA.
See 0526

Determining Soil Response Action Levels
Based on Potential Contaminant Migration to
Ground Water: A Compendium of Examples.
See 1497

Emergency Response Cleanup Services
Contracts (ERCS). Users Manual.

See 0024

Homeowners Exempted from Superfund
Cleanup Costs: National Policy Overview.
See 0428

National Priorities List Sites: Alabama.
See 0148

National Priorities List Sites: Alabama.
See 0149

National Priorities List Sites: Alabama, 1992.

f^QQ Q*j| 50

National Priorities List Sites: Alaska.
See 0181

National Priorities List Sites; Alaska.
See 0152

National Priorities List Sites: Alaska, 1992.
See 0153

National Priorities List Sites: American
Samoa, Guam, and the Trust Territories.
See 0154

National Priorities List Sites: American
Samoa, Guam and Trust Territories.
See 0155

National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and

Nevada.

See 0156

National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and

Nevada.

See 0157

National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and
Nevada, 1992.

See 0158

National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas.
See 0159

National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas.
See 0180

National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas, 1992.
See 0161

National Priorities List Sites: California.
See 0162

National Priorities List Sites: California and

Hawaii.

See 0163

National Priorities List Sites: California and
Hawaii, 1992.

See 0164

National Priorities List Sites: Colorado.
See 0165

National Priorities List Sites; Colorado.
See 0166

National Priorities List Sites: Colorado, 1992.
See 0167

National Priorities List Stes: Connecticut.
See 0168

National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut.
See 0169

National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut,

1992.

See 0170

National Priorities List Stes: Delaware.
See 0171

National Priorities List Sites: Delaware.
See 0172

National Priorities Lisl Sites: Delaware, 1992.
See 0173

National Priorities List Sites; Florida.
See 0174

National Priorities List Sites; Florida.
See 0175

National Priorities List Sites: Florida, 1092.
See 0176

National Priorities List Sites: Georgia.
See 0177

National Priorities List Sites: Georgia.
See 0178

National Priorities List Sites: Georgia, 1992.
See 0179

National Priorities List Sites: Hawaii.
See 0180

National Priorities List Sites: Idaho.

See 0181

National Priorities List Sites: Idaho.

See 0182

National Priorities List Sites: Idaho, 1992.
See 0183

National Priorities List Sites: Illinois.

See 0184

National Priorities List Sites: Illinois.

See 0185

National Priorities List Stes: Illinois, 1992.
See 0186

National Priorities List Sites: Indiana.
See 0187

National Priorities List Sites: Indiana.
See 0188

National Priorities List Sites: Indiana, 1992.
See 0189

National Priorities List Sites: Iowa.

See 0180

National Priorities List Sites: Iowa.

See 0191

National Priorities List Sites: Iowa, 1992.
See 0192

National Priorities List Sites; Kansas,
See 0193

National Priorities List Sites: Kansas.
S66 0194

National Priorities List Sites: Kansas, 1992.
See 0195

National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky.
See 0196

National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky,
See 0197

National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky, 1982.
See 0198

National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana.
See 0199

National Priorities List Sites; Louisiana.
See 0200

National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana, 1992.
See 0201

National Priorities List Sites: Maine.

See 0202

National Priorities List Sites: Maine.

See 0203

National Priorities List Sites: Maine, 1992.
See 0204

National Priorities List Sites: Maryland.
See 0205

National Priorities List Sites; Maryland.
See 0206

National Priorities List Sites: Maryland, 1992.
See 0207

National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts.
See 0208

National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts.
See 0209

National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts,

1892.

See 0210

National Priorities List Sites: Michigan.
See 0211

National Priorities List Sites: Michigan.
See 0212

National Priorities List Sites: Michigan, 1992.
See 0213

National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota,
See 0214

National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota.
See 0215

National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota,

1992.

S@6 0216

National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi.
See 0217

National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi.
See 0218

National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi,

1992.

See 0219

National Priorities List Sites: Missouri.
See 0220

National Priorities List Stes; Missouri.
See 0221

SU-7

-------
CLEANUP

SUBJECT INDEX

National Priorities List Sites: Missouri, 1992,
See 0222

National Priorities List Sites: Montana,
See 0223

National Priorities List Sites: Montana.
See 0224

National Priorities List Sites: Montana, 1992,
See 0225

National Priorities List Sites: Nebraska.
See 0226

National Priorities List Sites: Nebraska.
Sea 0227

National Priorities List Sites: Nebraska,

1902.

See 0228

National Priorities List Sites: New Hamp-
shire.

See 0229

National Priorities List Sites; New Hamp-
shire.

See 0230

National Priorities List Sites: New Hamp-
shire, 1992.

See 0231

National Priorities List Sites: New Jersey.
See 0232

National Priorities List Sites: New Jersey.
See 0233

National Priorities List Sites: New Jersey,

1992.

See 0234

National Priorities List Sites: New Mexico.
Sea 0235

National Priorities List Sites: New Mexico.
See 0236

National Priorities List Sites: New Mexico,

1992.

See 0237

National Priorities List Sites: New York.
See 0238

National Priorities List Sites: Naw York.
See 0239

National Priorities List Sites: New York,

1962.

See 0240

National Priorities List Sites: North and
South Dakota.

See 0241

National Priorities List Sites: North and
South Dakota, 1992.

See 0242

National Priorities List Sites: North Carolina,
See 0243

National Priorities List Sites: North Carolina,
See 0244

National Priorities List Sites: North Carolina,

1992.

See 0245

National Priorities List Sites: North Dakota
and South Dakota.

See 0248

National Priorities List Sites: Ohio.

Sea 0247

National Priorities List Sites: Ohio.

See 0248

National Priorities List Sites: Ohio, 1992.
See 0249

National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma.
See 0250

National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma.
See 02S1

National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma,

1992.

See 0252

National Priorities List Sites: Oregon.
See 0253

National Priorities List Sites: Oregon.
See 0254

National Priorities List Sites: Oregon, 1992.
See 02S5

SU-8

National Priorities List Sites: Pennsylvania.
See 0256

National Priorities List Sites: Pennsylvania.
See 0257

National Priorities List Sites: Pennsylvania,

1992.

See 0258

National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico.
See 0259

National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico.
See 0260

National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico and
Virgin Islands, 1992.

See 0261

National Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island.
See 0262

National Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island.
See 0263

National Priorities List Sites: Rhode Island,

1992,

See 0264

National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina
See 0266

National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina.
See 0287

National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina,

1992.

See 0268

National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee.
See 0269

National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee.
See 0270

National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee,

1992.

See 0271

National Priorities List Sites: Texas.

See 0272

National Priorities List Sites: Texas.

See 0273

National Priorities List Sites: Texas, 1992.
See 0274

National Priorities List Sites: The United
States Territories, 1992.

See 0275

National Priorities List Sites: Utah.

See 0276

National Priorities List Sites: Utah.

See 0277

National Priorities List Sites: Utah, 1992.
See 0278

National Priorities List Sites: Vermont.
See 0279

National Priorities List Sites: Vermont
See 0280

National Priorities List Sites: Vermont, 1992.
See 0281

National Priorities List Sites: Virginia.
See 0282

National Priorities List Sites: Virginia.
See 0283

National Priorities List Sites: Virginia, 1992.
See 0284

National Priorities List Sites: Washington.
See 0285

National Priorities List Sites: Washington.
See 0286

National Priorities List Sites: Washington,

1992.

See 0287

National Priorities List Sites: West Virginia.
See 0288

National Priorities List Sites: West Virginia.
See 0289

National Priorities List Sites: West Virginia,

1992.

See 0290

National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin.
See 0291

National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin.
See 0292

National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin,

1992.

See 0293

National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming.
See 0294

National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming.
See 0295

National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming, 1992.
See 0296

Political Subdivision Involvement in Super-

fund.

See 0480

Presentations EPA-State Soil Standards
Conference. Held In Crystal City, Virginia on
January 29, 1991.

See 1524

Factors Affecting the Applicability of Plasma
Systems to the Cleanup of Superfund Sites,
See 1250

Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model

(SACM).

See 0119

Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
(SACM) Coordination Strategy.

See 0120

Superfund and Small Waste Contributors.
See 0881

Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1993 (Bunker Hill
Site Profile, Silver Valley, Northern Idaho).
See 0951

Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1993 (Johns-
Manville Site Profile, Illinois).

See 0852

Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Army
Creek Landfill Site Profile, New Castle, Dela-
ware).

See 0962

Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Chis-
man Creek Site Profile, York County, Virgin-
la).

See 0963

Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993
(Common Steps in the Removal Process).
See 0965

Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (East-
ern Diversified Metals Site Profile, Schuylkill
County, Pennsylvania).

See 0986

Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Rke/
Artel Chemical Site Profile, Nitro, West Vir-
ginia).

See 0967

Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (North-
side Landfill Site Profile, Spokane, Washing-
ton).

See 0968

Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Rogue
Valley/Ditch Creek Ranch Site Profile,
Wimer, Oregon).

See 0989

Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide. Winter 1993. (Wells <3
and H Site, Woburn, Massachusetts).
See 0S72

Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1994 (Bailey
Waste Disposal Site Profile, Texas).

See 0973

-------
SUBJECT INDEX

COMMUNITY RELATIONS

Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Winter 1994 (Sey-
mour Recycling Site Profile, Seymour, Indi-
ana).

See 0975

SUPERFUND: Focusing on the Nation at
Large. A Decade of Progress at National
Priorities List Sites.

See 0321

Superfund: Focusing on Hie Nation at Large.
A Decade of Progress at National Priorities
List Sites.

See 0322

Superfund Strategic Plan and Implementa-
tion Strategy Fiscal Year 1994.

See 0126

Superfund Strategic Plan and Implementa-
tion Strategy Fiscal Year 1994: Office and
Division Plans.

See 0127
CLEANUP OPERATIONS

Accessing Federal Data Bases for Contami-
nated Site Clean-Up Technologies (Second
Edition).

See 1189

Assessing Sites under SACM: Interim Guid-
ance. Volume 1, Number 4, Deccember
1992.

See 0084

Bioremediation: An Information Update on
Applying Bioremediation to Site Cleanup.
See 1421

Bioremediation In the Field. An Information
Update on Applying Bioremediation to Site
Clean-Up. Number 3.

See 1422

Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats
Feasibility Study. Development of Sediment
Cleanup Goals.

See 1578

Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats
Feasibility Study, Executive Summary.
See 1579

Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats
Feasibility Study. Volume 1.

See 1580

Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats
Feasibility Study. Volume 2. Appendices.
See 1581

Community Relations in Superfund: A Hand-
book.

See 0467

Early Action and Long-Term Action under
SACM: Interim Guidance, Volume 1, Number
2, December 1982.

See 0089

ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 3. The
Role of Natural Resource Trustees in the
Superfund Process.

See 1021

ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 4. Develop-
ing a Work Scope for Ecological Assess-
ments.

See 1022

Enhancing State Superfund Capabilities:
Nine-State Study.

See 0471

Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
edies: Phase 2. Volume 1. Summary Report.
See 1444

Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
edies: Phase 2. Volume 2. Case Studies and
Updates.

See 1445

Exxon Valdez Oil Spill. A Report to the

President.

See 0928

Framework for Real-Time Decision-Making:
New Bedford Harbor Pilot Dredging Study.
See 1587

Guidance on EPA Oversight of Remedial De-
signs and Remedial Actions Performed by
Potentially Responsible Parties.

See 1128

Harmonization of QA Procedures for Envi-
ronmental Data Operations: Development of
a National Consensus Standard for Quality
Assurance for Environmental Programs.
See 0989

In-situ Stabilization/Solidification of PCB
(Polychlorinated Biphanyls)-Contaminated
Soil.

See 1556

Description of EPA SITE Demonstration of
the HAZCON Stabilization Process at the
Douglassville, Pennsylvania Superfund Site.
See 1552

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Ground
Water Extraction Systems.

See 1443

SACM Regional Decision Teams: Interim
Guidance. Volume 1, Number 5, December
1992.

See 0111

Status of Key SACM Program Management
Issues: Interim Guidance, Volume 1, Number
1, December 1992.

See 0113

Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Bulletin:
Presumptive Remedies for Wood Treatment
Facilities. Volume 1, Number 2, May 1992.
See 0116

Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Bulletin.
Volume 1, Number 3. Presumptive Reme-
dies.

See 0118

Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
(SACM). Volume 1, Number 4, November
1092.

See 0122

Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (American
Thermostat Corporation, New York).
See 0942

Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Glean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Ciba-Geigy
Corporation, Mcintosh, Alabama).

See 0944

Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Krysowaty
Farm, Hillsborough, New Jersey).

See 0945

Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Valley of
the Drums, Bullitt County, Kentucky).
See 0947

Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fall 1992. (Wide
Beach Section of Brant, New York).
See 0948

Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (French
Limited Site Profile, Harris County, Texas).
See 0954

Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Old Mid-
land Products Site Profile, Yeil County, Ar-
kansas).

See 0957

Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (United
Chrome Products Site Profile).

See 0961

Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Summer 1993 (Tri-
State Plating Site Profile, Columbus, Indi-
ana).

See 0970

Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally Funded Removals.
Volume 3.

See 0318

Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Technology Profiles, Fourth Edi-
tion.

See 1316

Superfund: Report of the EPA Superfund
Reivitalizatlon Public Meeting Held on June
24, 1992. Volumes 1 and 2.

See 0333

Technology Evaluation Report; SITE Pro-
gram. CF Systems Orgartics Extraction
System, New Bedford, Massachusetts.
Volume 1.

See 1346
CLEANUP TIME

Cleaning Up the Nation's Waste Sites: Mar-
kets and Technology Trends.

See 0132
COLLECTING METHODS

In-silu Stabilization/Solidification of PCB
(Polyohlorinated Blphenyls)-Contamlnated
Soil.

See 1556
COLORADO

National Priorities list Sites: Colorado.
See 0165

National Priorities List Sites: Colorado.
See 0166

National Priorities List Sites: Colorado, 1992.
See 0167

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
TOP Listing by Site for Colorado.

See 0636

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.

See 0837

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.

See 0638
COMBUSTION EFFICIENCY

Control of Transient Incinerator Emissions
with an Oxygen Based Combustion System.
See 1401

Retecti, Inc., Plasma Centrifugal Furnace:
Applications Analysis Report.

See 1295
COMBUSTION PRODUCTS

Comparison of Organic Emissions from Haz-
ardous Waste Incinerators versus the 1990
Toxic Release Inventory Air Releases,
See 1397
COMMENCEMENT BAY

Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats
Feasibility Study, Development of Sediment
Cleanup Goals,

See 1578

Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats
Feasibility Study. Executive Summary.
See 1579

Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats
Feasibility Study, Volume 1.

See 1580

Commencement Bay Nearshore/Tideflats
Feasibility Study. Volume 2, Appendices.
See 1581
COMMUNITY RELATIONS

Community Relations during Enforcement
Activities and Development of the Adminis-
trative Record.

See 0465

Community Relations in Superfund: A Hand-
book.

See 0467

SU-9

-------
COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY RESPONSE
CLEAN-UP AND LIABILITY ACT (CERCLA)

SUBJECT INDEX

Community Relations: Use of Senior Envi-
ronmental Employees in Superfund (Super-
fund Management Review: Recommendation
43.K.L).

See 0088

Guide to Community Involvement for Site
Assessment Managers.

See 0476

Mandatory Community Relations Training.
Superfund Management Review Implementa-
tion Product (Recommendation: No. 43.P(i)).
See 0103

Planning for Sufficient Community Relations
(Superfund Management Review: No. 43A).
See 0108

Proposed Method to Evaluate the Effective-
ness of Community Involvement in Super-
fund (Superfund Management Review; Rec-
ommendation Number 43,A).

See 0109

Rote of Community Interviews in the Devel-
opment of a Community Relations Program
for Remedial Response.

See 048S

Superfund Responsiveness Summaries (Su-
perfund Management Review: Recommen-
dation Number 43E).

See 0125

Using State and Local Officials to Assist in
Community Relations (Superfund Manage-
ment Review: Recommendation No. 43.K.L).
See 0128

COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY RESPONSE
CLEAN-UP AND LIABILITY ACT (CERCLA)

Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software (for Microcomput-
ers).

See 0034

inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software for the PC (Ver-
sion 3/90) User Manual.

See 0035

Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (for Microcom-
puters).

See 0047

Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software for the PC (Ver-
sion 2/90) User Manual.

See 0048

COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENT RESPONSE
COMPENSATION AND LIABILITY ACT

Redelegation of Civil Judicial Settlement Au-
thorities under Delegation 14-13-B and 14-
14-E.

See 0593

Revision of CERCLA Civil Judicial Settle-
ment Authorities under Delegations 14-13-B
and 14-14-E.

See 0602

Waiver of Concurrence on De Minimis Gen-
erator Settlements.

See 0892

COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL
RESPONSE

Evaluating Mixed Funding Settlements under

CERCLA.

See 0537

Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 1.

See 1174

Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 2.

See 1175

Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980;
EPA Region 3.

See 1176

Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 4,

See 1177

Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 5.

See 1178

Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 6.

See 1179

Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 7.

See 1180

Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 8,

See 1181

Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980;
EPA Region 9.

See 11B2

Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response. Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 10.

See 1183

Superfund Progress - Aficionado's Version
(Progress as of March 31, 1992).

See 0326

COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL
RESPONSE COMPENSATION AND
LIABILITIES ACT (CERCLA)

Superfund Policy Forum Update, Volume 1,
Number 1, February 1992.

See 0324

COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL
RESPONSE COMPENSATION AND LIABILITY
ACT

Assessing Reports of Continuous Releases
of Hazardous Substances: A Guide for EPA
Regions.

See 1142

CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual: Overview of ARARs - Focus on
ARAR Waivers.

See 0408

CERCLA Compliance with the RCRA Toxici-
ty Characteristics (TC) Rule: Part 2.

See 0412

Exemptions from the Statutory Limits on Re-
moval Actions.

See 1002

Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA.

See 1154

Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Soil Washing. Interim Guid-
ance.

See 1165

Quide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Soil Washing: Quick Refer-
ence Fact Sheet.

See 1166

Political Subdivision Involvement in Super-

fund.

See 0480

Reporting Requirements for Continuous Re-
leases of Hazardous Substances: A Guide
for Facilities and Vessels on Compliance.
See 1150

Streamlining the RI/FS for CERCLA Munici-
pal Landfill Sites.

See 1119

Treatability Studies Under CERCLA: An

Overview.

See 1172

COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL
RESPONSE COMPENSATION AND LIABILITY
ACT (CERCLA)

GERCLIS Characterization Project: National

Results.

See 0001

CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 3

Results.

See 0004

CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 4

Results.

See 0005

CERCLIS Characterization Project; Region 5

Results.

See 0006

CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 6

Results.

See 0007

CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 7

Results.

See 0008

CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 8

Results.

See 0009

CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 9

Results.

See 0010

CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region
10 Results.

See 0011

COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL
RESPONSE COMPENSATION AND LIABILITY
ACT OF 1980

CERCLIS - WasteLAN - CleanLAN.

See 0015
COMPUTER APPLICATIONS

PREscore Software. Users Manual and Tuto-
rial. Version 1.0.

See 0374
COMPUTER PROGRAMS

Computer Models Used to Support Cleanup
Decision-Making at Hazardous and Radioac-
tive Waste Sites.

See 1218
COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION

Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Air Stripper Design Manual.
See 1374

Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Comparisons of Air Stripper
Simulations and Field Performance Data.
Sea 1376

BEN: A Model to Calculate the Economic
Benefit of Noncompliance. User's Manual.
See 0513

Contingency Analysis Modeling for Super-
fund Sites and Other Sources.

See 1219

SU-10

-------
SUBJECT INDEX

COORDINATED PROCUREMENT

Continuous Release Emergency Response
Notification System and Priority Assessment
Model: Model Documentation.

See 1143

Continuous Release-Emergency Response
Notification System and Priority Assessment
Model: User's Manual for EPA Regions.
See 1144
CONNECTICUT

National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut.
See 0168

National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut.
See 0169

National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut,

1992.

See 0170

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.

See 0639

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.

See 0640

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site lor Connecticut.

See 0641
CONSENT ORDERS

Transmittal of Model Consent Decree for
CERCLA Section 104(e) Information Re-
quest Enforcement Actions.

Sea 0888
CONSTRUCTION

NPL Construction Completion Definition at
Bioremediation and Soil Vapor Extraction
Sites.

See 0365
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

ARCS Construction Contract Modification

Procedures.

See 0020

Expediting Remedial Construction.

See 1127
CONTAINERS

Specifications and Quidance for Contami-
nant-Free Sample Containers.

See 0994
CONTAINMENT

Engineering Bulletin: Slurry Walls.

See 123S

Technical Guidance Document: Construction
Quality Management for Remedial Action
and Remedial Design Waste Containment
Systems.

Set 1334
CONTINGENCY PLANNING

Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Contingency Plans at Super-
fund Sites Using Air Monitoring.

See 1378

Contingency Analysis Modeling for Super-
fund Sites and Other Sources.

See 1219

Oil Spill Prevention, Control, and Counter-
measures Program. Task Force Report,
See 0932
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION

ARCS {Alternative Remedial Contract Strate-
gy) Contracts Users' Manual.

See 0019

CERCLIS Data Handling Support Policy

Statement.

See 0013

Contracting and Subcontracting Guide to the
Superfund Program.

See 0023

Emergency Response Cleanup Services
Contracts (ERCS). Users Manual.

See 0024

Implementation of the Alternative Remedial
Contracting Strategy (ARCS) Task Force
Recommendations: Transmittal of the Imple-
mentation Plan.

See 0030

Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software (for Microcomput-
ers).

See 0034

Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software for the PC (Ver-
sion 3/90) User Manual.

See 0035

Mentor-Protege Program.

See 0044

Modal Performance Standards for Superfund
Project Officers, Deputy Project Officers, and
Work Assignment Managers/Delivery Order
Officers.

See 004S

Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software {for Microcom-
puters).

See 0047

Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software for the PC (Ver-
sion 2/90) U3er Manual.

See 0048

Resources for Preparing Independent Gov-
ernment Estimates for Remedial Contracting
Work Assignments.

See 0086

Superfund Contracts Management Issues.
See 0072

Superfund Response Action Contracts.
See 0074

USACE Preplaced and Rapid Response

Contracts.

See 1139

User's Qulde to Contract Laboratory Pro-
gram.

See 0078

CONTRACT LABORATORY PROGRAM

Guidelines for Effective Management of the
Contract Laboratory Program.

See 0027

Guidelines for Effective Management of the
Contract Laboratory Program. Part 1. Con-
tract Award. Part 2. Contract Administration.
See 0028

Sampler's Guide to the Contract Laboratory

Program.

See 0071

USEPA Contract Laboratory Program Nation-
al Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data
Review.

See 0997

User's Guide to Contract Laboratory Pro-
gram.

See 0078

User's Guide to the Contract Laboratory Pro-
gram.

See 0079
CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

Ensuring the Adequacy of Cost Share Provi-
sions In Superfund State Contracts.

See 0472

Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version

4) (for Microcomputers).

See 0036

Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version

5) (for Microcomputers).

See 0039

Obligation of Funds under Superfund State

Contracts.

See 0478

Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (OLM01.8 Ver-
sion 6) {for Microcomputers).

See 0053

Procedure for Use of USACE Preplaced
Contracts to Expedite Superfund Cleanup
Tasks.

See 1131

Required Contracts Management Training
for Regional Superfund Personnel.

See 0065

Technical Assistance Team (TAT) Contracts
Users' Manual.

See 0075
CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL

Rotes and Responsibilities of Regional
Project Officers, Zone Project Officers, Work
Assignment Managers and Contracting Offi-
cers for the RCRA Enforcement, Permitting
and Assistance Contracts (REPA).

See 0070
CONTRACTS

Approval of Long Term Contracting Strategy
for Superfund (Superfund Management
Review: Recommendation E.2).

See 0018

Long-Term Contracting Strategy far Super-
fund.

See 0042
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS

Guidance on Site Assessment Cooperative

Agreements.

See 0475

Involvement of Superfund Program Manag-
ers in Superfund Response Agreement
Audits.

See 0099
COORDINATED PROCUREMENT

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by Party Name Report.

See 0807

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by Party Name Report
See 0608

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National Frequency by PRP Name Report
See 0614

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP listing Alphabetically by PRP
Name.

See 0615

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Listing by Site,

See 0617

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.

See 0621

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.

See 0622

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for American Samoa.
See 0624

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for American Samoa.
See 0625

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.

See 0627

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.

See 0628

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.

See 0630

SU-11

-------
COORDINATED PROCUREMENT

SUBJECT INDEX

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.

See 0631

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for California.

See 0633

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for California.

See 0634

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.

See 0636

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.

See 0637

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
See 0639

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
See 0640

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.

See 0642

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.

See 0643

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Florida.

See 0645

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Florida.

See 0646

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.

See 0648

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.

See 0649

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.

See 06S1

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.

See 0652

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.

See 06S4

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.

See 0655

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.

See 0657

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.

See 0658

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.

See 0660

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.

See 0661

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing fay Site for Kansas.

See 0663

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.

See 0664

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.

See 0666

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.

See 0667

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.

See 0669

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.

See 0670

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maine.

See 0672

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maine.

See 0673

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.

See 0675

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Maryland,

See 0676

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
See 0678

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
See 0679

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.

See 0681

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.

See 0682

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.

See 0684

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.

See 0685

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PHP Listing by Site for Mississippi.

See 0687

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.

See 0688

Sit® Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Missouri.

See 0690

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Missouri.

See 0691

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Montana.

See 0693

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Montana.

See 0694

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.

See 0696

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.

See 0697

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Nevada.

See 0699

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nevada.

See 0700

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
See 0702

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
See 0703

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.
See 0705

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.
See 0706

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
See 0708

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
See 0709

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New York.

See 0711

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New York.

See 0712

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
See 0714

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
See 0715

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Dakota.
See 0717

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Dakota,
See 0716

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Northern Marianas.
See 0720

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Northern Marianas.
See 0721

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.

See 0723

Site Enforcement 1 racking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.

See 0724

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.

See 0726

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.

See 0727

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by ate for Oregon.

See 0729

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.

See 0730

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
See 0732

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
See 0733

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Ste for Puerto Rioo.
See 0736

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by ate for Puerto Rico.
See 0736

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
See 0787

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site tor Rhode Island.
See 0788

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
See 0790

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
See 0791

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
See 0793

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
See 0794

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.

See 0796

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listtig by Site for Tennessee.

See 0797

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Texas.

See 0799

SU-12

-------
SUBJECT INDEX

DATA BASES

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Texas.

See 0800

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories.
See 0802

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories.
See 0803

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Utah.

See 0805

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Utah.

See 0806

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.

See 0808

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site tor Vermont.

See 0809

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Virginia.

See 0811

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Washington.

See 0813

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Washington.

See 0814

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia,
See 0816

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
See 0817

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.

See 0819

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.

See 0820

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming.

See 0822

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming.

See 0823

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.

See 0828

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.

See 0827

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.

See 0832

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.

See 0833

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Site Listing by Site for Virginia.
See 0848

CORA (COST OF REMEDIAL ACTION)

Cost of Remedial Action Model.

See 1085
CORPS OF ENGINEERS

Procedure for Use of USACE Preplaced
Contracts to Expedite Superfund Cleanup
Tasks.

See 1131
COST ANALYSIS

Technology Evaluation Report SITE Program
Demonstration Test, HAZCON Solidification,
Douglassville, Pennsylvania. Volume 1.
See 1569

COST ESTIMATES

Cost of Remedial Actions (CORA) Model:
Overview and Applications.

See 1086

Control Technology: Estimating Innovative
Technology Costs for the SITE Program.
See 1222

Cost Estimating Systems for RemecBal
Action Projects.

See 1123

Estimation of the Cost of Using Chemical
Protective Clothing.

See 1244

Scoper's Notes: An RI/FS Costing Guide.
Bringing in a Quality RI/FS on Time and
Within Budget.

See 1117
COSTS

CASHOUT Model: Calculates Currant Value
of Superfund Cleanup Costs (Version 1.2)
(for Microcomputers).

See 1208

CASHOUT User's Manual for Superfund.
See 0515
COVERINGS

Engineering Bulletin: Landfill Covers.
See 1233

Ground-Water Issue: The Effects of Well
Casing Material on Ground Water-Quality,
See 1457
CREATED WETLANDS

Handbook for Constructed Wetlands Receiv-
ing Add Mine Drainage.

See 1588
CREOSOTE

Alternative Biological Treatment Processes
for Remediation of Creosote-and PCP-Con-
taminated Materials: Bench-Scale Treatabil-
ity Studies,

See 1418

On-Siie Engineering Report of the Slurry-
Phase Biological Reactor for Pilot-Scale
Testing on Contaminated Soil.

See 1520

Pilot-Scale Demonstration of a Slurry-Phase
Biological Reactor for Creosote-Contaminat-
ed Soil. Applications Analysis Report.
See 1426

Bench-Scale Evaluation of Alternative Bio-
logical Treatment Processes for the Remedi-
ation of Pentachlorophenol- and Creosote-
Contaminated Materials: Slurry-Phase Biore-
mediatlon.

See 1419

Bench-Scale Evaluation ol Alternative Bio-
logical Treatment Processes for the Remedi-
ation of Pentachlorophenol- and Creosote-
Contaminated Materials: Solid-Phase Biore-
mediation.

See 1420

Biodegradation of Creosote and Pentachlor-
ophenol in Contaminated Groundwater:
Chemical and Biological Assessment.
See 1432

Detoxification of Pentachlorophenol and Cre-
osote Contaminated Groundwater by Physi-
cal Extraction: Chemical and Biological As-
sessment
See 1438

Removal of Creosote from Soil by Thermal

Desorption.

See 1630

Technology Evaluation Report: Pilot-Scale
Demonstration of a Slurry-Phase Biological
Reactor for Creosote-Contaminated Soil.
Volume 1.

See 1542

CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS

Criminal Investigations and the Superfund
Program.

See 0469
CRUDE OIL

National CXI and Hazardous Substances Pol-
lution Contingency Plan (as Published in the
Federal Register, March 8, 1990).

Ste 0145
CYCLONE COMBUSTORS

Technology Evaluation Report: Baboock and
Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrification Tech-
nology. Volume 1.

See 1337

Technology Evaluation Report; Baboock and
Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrification Tech-
nology. Volume 2.

See 1338
DATA ACQUISITION

Cleanup Information Bulletin Board System
Users Guide. (CLU-IN: Cleanup Information
Bulletin Board).

See 1215

Guidance far Data Useability In Risk Assess-
ment.

See 1030

Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
ment. Interim Report.

See 1032
DATA AQUISITION

Accessing Federal Data Bases for Contami-
nated Site Clean-Up Technologies.

See 1188
DATA BASE MANAGEMENT

First 125 De Minimis Settlements: Statistics
from ERA'S De Minimis Database.

See 0543

Superfund Soils Data Management System.
See 1536
DATA BASES

Accessing Federal Data Bases for Contami-
nated Site Clean-Up Technologies (Second
Edition).

See 1189

Emergency Response Notification System.
See 0927

Site Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 1 (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: October 1991.

See 0382

Site Assessment information Directory
(SAID) Region 2 (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage; October 1991.

See 0383

Site Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 3 (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage; October 1991.

See 0384

Site Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 4 (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: October 1991.

See 0385

Site Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 5 (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: 1991.

See- 0386

Site Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 8 (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage; October 1991.

See 0387

Site Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 7 (for Microcomputers), Date
of Coverage: October 1991.

See 0388

SU-13

-------
DATA FILE

SUBJECT INDEX

Site Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 8 (for Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: 1891.

See 0389

Site Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 9 (tor Microcomputers). Date
of Coverage: October 1991.

See 0390

Site Assessment Information Directory
(SAID) Region 10 (for Microcomputers), Date
of Coverage: October 1991.

See 0391
DATA FILE

CERCUS (Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Infor-
mation System) Site Location Extract
See 0012

Notification of Hazardous Substance Sites
(Section 103(c)).

See 1147

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)

(National).

See 0611

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(National) (for Microcomputers).

See 0613

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(National - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette, IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).

See 0620

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 1-3 1/2 inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).

See 0849

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 1) (for Microcomputers).

See 0850

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 2-3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers),

See 0851

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 2) (for Microcomputers).

See 0852

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 3-3 1/2 inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).

See 0853

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 3) (for Microcomputers).

See 0854

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 4-3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).

See 0855

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 4) (for Microcomputers).

See 0856

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 5-3 1/2 inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).

See 085?

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region S) (for Microcomputers).

See 0858

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 6-3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).

See 0859

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 6) {for Microcomputers),

See 0860

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 7-3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).

Sea 0861

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 7) (for Microcomputers).

See 0862

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 8-3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).

See 0863

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 8) (lor Microcomputers).

See 0864

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 9-3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers),

See 0865

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 9) (for Microcomputers).

See 0866

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 10 - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).

See 0887

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 10) (for Microcomputers).

See 0868
DATA QUALITY

Data Quality Objectives Process for Super-
fund.

See 0982
DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES

Data Quality Objectives Decision Error Fea-
sibility Trials (DEFT) Beta Version 1.01.
User's Guide.

See 0979

Data Quality Objectives Process for Super-

fund.

See 0981

Data Quality Objectives Process for Super-
fund: Interim Final Guidance.

See 0983

Data Quality Objectives Process lor Super-
fund: Workbook,

See 0984
DATA REQUIREMENTS

Engineering Bulletin: Technology Preselec-
tion Data Requirements.

See 1405
DDT

Health Effects Assessment for DDT.
See 1041
DE MINIMIS SETTLEMENTS

First 125 De Minimis Settlements: Statistics
from EPA's De Minimis Database.

See 0543
DEBRIS

Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatability Vari-
ance for Removal Actions. Superfund LDR
Guide No. 6B.

See 0430
DECENTRALIZATION (DISPERSAL)

Decentralization of Superfund Bottle Reposi-
tory Functions.

See 0985
DECISION MAKING

Framework for Real-Time Decision-Making:
New Bedford Harbor Pilot Dredging Study.
See 1587
DECONTAMINATION

Field Standard Operating Procedures for the
Decontamination of Response Personnel
F.S.O.P. No. 7.

See 0913

Innovative Technology: Soil Washing.
See 1515
DEHALOGENATION

Chemical Dehaiogenation Treatability Stud-
ies under CERCLA: An Overview.

See 1153

Chemical Dehaiogenation Treatment: APEG

Treatment.

See 1210

Citizen's Giade to G^colate Dehaiogenation.
See 0454

Innovative Technology: Glycoiate Dehaio-
genation.

See 1513

Reductive Dehaiogenation of Organic Con-
taminants in Sals and Ground Water.
Ground Water Issue.

See 1527
DELAWARE

National Priorities List Sites: Delaware.
See 0171

National Monties List Sites: Delaware,
See 0172

National Priorities List Sites: Delaware, 1992.
See 0173

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.

See 0642

Site Enforcement Tractdng System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.

See 0643

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.

See 0644
DEMONSTRATION PROGRAMS

Demonstration of Hazardous Waste Site
Treatment Technologies.

See 1227

Demonstration Projects Under the U.S. EPA
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program,

See 1230

Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program: Annual Report to Congress 1992.
See 1309

DENSE NONAQUEOUS PHASE LIQUIDS

Estimating Potential for Occurrence of
DNAPL at Superfund Sites.

See 1442
RESORPTION

On-Site Engineering Report for the Low-
Temperature Thermal Desorption Pilot-Scale
Test on Contaminated Soil.

See 1519

Removal of Creosote from Soil by Thermal

Desorption.

See 1530

Thermal Desorption Treatment.

See 1357
DIOXIN

Evaluation of Personal Cooling Devices lor
Dioxin Clean-Up Operation.

See 1248
DIRECTIVES

Accessing the $50 Million Set-Aside in the
Remedial Action Budget for Quick Response
at National Priorities List Sites.

See 1082

Authorization for Regional Administrators to
Approve Consistency Exemptions at NPL
Sites.

See 0998

Discussions with the Public Concerning NPL

Listings.

See 0339

NPL Construction Completion Definition at
Bioremodiation and Soil Vapor Extraction
Sites.

See 0365

Superfund Accelerated Cleanup Model
(SACM) Coordination Strategy.

See 0120
DIRECTORIES

Hazmat Team Planning Guidance.

See 0915

SU-14

-------
SUBJECT INDEX

DIRECTORIES

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by Party Name Report
See 0608

Sits Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by Party Name Report.

See 0809

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
Frequency by PRP Name Report, September
26,1991.

See 0610

Sits Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National Alphabetical Report by PRP Name,
September 28,1691.

See 0612

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
National Frequency by PRP Name Report
See 0614

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Listing Alphabetically by PRP
Name.

See 0615

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Listing by Site.

See 0617

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Listing by Site.

See 0618

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Report by Site, September 26,
1991.

See 0619

Ste Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(National - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette, IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).

See 0620

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.

See 0621

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site tor Alabama.

See 0622

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.

See 0623

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for American Samoa,
See 0624

Ste Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for American Samoa,
See 0625

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for American Samoa.
See 0626

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.

See 0627

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.

See 0628

Sits Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.

See 0629

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.

See 0630

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.

See 0631

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
P3P Listing by Site for Arkansas.

Sea 0632

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for California.

See 0633

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for California.

See 0634

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for California,

See 0635

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.

See 0636

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.

See 0637

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Sits for Colorado,

See 0638

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
See 0639

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut
See 0640

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
See 0641

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.

See 0642

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.

See 0643

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.

See 0644

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Florida.

See 0645

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Florida.

See 0646

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Florida.

See 0647

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.

See 0648

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.

Sae 0649

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Sit® for Georgia,

See 0650

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Sits for Idaho.

See 0651

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.

See 0652

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.

See 0653

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.

See 0654

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.

See 0655

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.

See 0656

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.

See 0657

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.

See 06S8

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.

See 0659

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for lowa.

See 0660

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for lowa.

See 0661

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for lowa.

See 0662

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.

See 0663

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site tor Kansas.

See 0664

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.

See 0665

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky.

See 0666

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site tor Kentucky.

See 0667

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site tor Kentucky.

See 0668

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.

See 0669

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana,

See 0670

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.

See 0671

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site tor Maine.

See 0672

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Maine.

See 0673

ate Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Maine.

See 0674

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.

Sae 067S

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.

See 0676

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.

See 0677

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
See 0678

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
See 0679

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
See 0680

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.

See 0681

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.

See 0682

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.

See 0683

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota
See 0684

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP listing by Site for Minnesota.

See 0685

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.

See 0686

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.

See 0687

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi,

See 0688

SU-15

-------
DIRECTORIES

SUBJECT INDEX

S'te Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.

See 0689

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Missouri.

See 0690

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Missouri.

See 0691

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Missouri.

See 0692

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Montana.

See 0693

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Montana.

See 0694

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Montana.

See 0695

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.

See 0696

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.

See 0697

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.

See 0698

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nevada.

See 0699

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nevada.

See 0700

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nevada.

See 0701

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
See 0702

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
See 0703

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire,
See 0704

ate Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.
See 0705

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.

See 0706

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.
See 0707

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
See 0708

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
See 0709

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico.
See 0710

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for New York.

See 0711

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for New York.

See 0712

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New York.

See 0713

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
See 0714

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
Sea 0715

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
See 0716

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Dakota.
See 0717

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Dakota.
See 0718

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Dakota.
See 0719

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Sits for Northern Marianas.
See 0720

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Northern Marianas.
See 0721

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Northern Marianas.
See 0722

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.

See 0723

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.

Sea 0724

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.

See 0725

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.

See 0726

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.

See 0727

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Oklahoma
See 0728

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.

See 0729

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.

See 0730

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Oregon.

See 0731

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
See 0732

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
See 0733

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Pennsylvania.
See 0734

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
See 0735

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
See 0736

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.

See 0737

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1.

See 0738

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1, January
22, 1992,

See 0741

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1. Volume 1.
See 0742

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2.

See 0743

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2, January
22, 1992.

See 0746

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2. Volume 2.
See 0747

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 3.

See 0748

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 3, January
22, 1992.

See 0750

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 3. Volume 3.
See 0751

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4.

See 0752

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4, January
22, 1992.

See 0755

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4. Volume 4.
See 0756

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5.

See 0757

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5, January
22,1992.

See 0760

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5. Volume 5.
See 0761

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6.

See 0762

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6, January
22, 1992.

See 0765

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6. Volume 6.
See 0766

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7.

See 0767

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7, January
22, 1902.

See 0770

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7. Volume 7.
See 0771

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Usting by Site for Region 8.

See 0772

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8, January
22,1992.

See 0775

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8. Volume 8.
See 0778

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9.

See 0777

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9.

See 0778

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9, January
22, 1992.

See 0780

SU-16

-------
SUBJECT INDEX

DIRECTORIES

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9, Volume 9.
See 0781

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10.

See 0782

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10, January
22,1992.

See 0785

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10. Volume

10,

See 0786

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
See 0787

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
See 0788

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Rhode Island.
See 0789

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
See 0790

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
Sea 0791

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Carolina.
See 0792

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
See 0793

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
See 0794

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for South Dakota.
See 0795

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.

See 0796

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.

See 0797

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Tennessee.

See 0798

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Texas.

See 0799

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Texas.

See 0800

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Texas.

See 0801

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories.
See 0802

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories.
See 0803

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Trust Territories.
See 0804

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Utah.

See 0805

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Utah.

See 0806

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Utah.

See 0807

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.

See 0808

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.

See 0809

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Vermont.

See 0810

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Virginia.

See 0811

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Virginia.

See 0812

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Washington.

See 0813

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Washington.

See 0814

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Washington,

See 0815

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia
See 0816

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
See 0817

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for West Virginia.
See 0818

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.

See 0819

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.

See 0820

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wisconsin.

See 0821

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming.

See 0822

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming.

See 0823

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Wyoming.

See 0824

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Frequency by Party Name,
January 22,1992.

So© 0825

Sits Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.

See 0826

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.

See 0827

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.

See 0828

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name.

See 0829

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP National Listing Alphabetically by Party
Name, January 22,1992.

See 0831

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site,

See 0832

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.

Sae 0833

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.

See 0834

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site.

See 0835

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP National Listing by Site, January 22,
1992.

See 0837

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 1, September
26, 1991.

See 0838

ate Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
TOP Report by Site for Region 2, September
26, 1981.

See 0839

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 3, September
26, 1991.

See 0840

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 4, September
26, 1991.

See 0841

ate Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 5, September
26, 1991.

See 0842

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):

PRP Report by Site for Region 6, September
26,1891.

See 0843

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 7, September
26, 1991.

S©8 0844

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 9, September
26,1991.

See 0846

ate Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 10, Septem-
ber 26,1991.

See 0847

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Site Listing by Site for Virginia.

See 0848

Ste Enforcement Tracing System (SETS)
(Region 1 - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).

See 0849

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 2-3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers),

See 08S1

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 3-3 1/2 inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).

See 0853

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 4-3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).

See 0855

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 5-3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers),

See 0857

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 6-3 1/2 inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).

See 0859

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 7-3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).

Sse 0861

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 8-3 1/2 inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).

See 0863

SU-17

-------
DNA DAMAGE

SUBJECT INDEX

Ste Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 9-3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).

See 0865

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 10 - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).

See 0867
DNA DAMAGE

Evaluation of Exposure Markers.

See 1246

Using the DNA Alkaline Unwinding Assay to
Delect DNA Damage in Laboratory and Envi-
ronmentally Exposed Cells and Tissues.
See 1388
DNA UNWINDING! PROTEINS

Using the DNA Alkaline Unwinding Assay to
Detect DNA Damage in Laboratory and Envi-
ronmentally Exposed Cells and Tissues.
See 1388
DOCUMENTATION

CERCLIS Data Handling Support Policy

Statement,

See 0013

Continuous Release-Emergency Response
Notification System and Priority Assessment
Modal; Model Documentation,

See 1143
DOCUMENTS

Design Considerations for Ambient Air Moni-
toring at Superfund Sites. Engineering Bulle-
tin.

See 1402

Engineering Bulletins: Aids to the Develop-
ment of Remedial Alternatives.

See 1236
DREDGE SPOIL

SITE Demonstration of the CF Systems Or-
ganics Extraction System.

See 1301
DREDGING

Framework lor Real-Time Decision-Making:
New Bedford Harbor Pilot Dredging Study.
See 158?

Application of 'Real-Time' Monitoring in De-
cision Making; The New Bedford Harbor
Pilot Dredging Project.

Sea 1574

Development and Use oi Site-Specific
Chemical and Biological Criteria for Assess-
ing New Bedford Harbor Pilot Dredging
Project.

See 1S83
DRINKING WATER

ARARs Q's and A's Compliance with New
SDWA National Primary Drinking Water Reg-
ulations for Organic and Inorganic Chemi-
cals.

See 0400

Compendium of Federal Financial Assist-
ance Programs'. Targeting Programs for
Stale and Local Ground-Water Protection.
See 1435

Remediation Completed: But Is the Ground-
water Meeting the Safe Drinking Water Act
Requirements. Haztech International 90.
Held in Houston, Texas on May 8-10, 1990.
See 1473
DRUG FREE WORK PLACE ACT
Debarment and Suspension.

See 0470
DRUG INDUSTRY

Guidelines for the Cleanup of Clandestine
Drug Laboratories.

See 1007

DRUGS

Guidelines for the Cleanup of Clandestine
Drug Laboratories.

See 1007
DRUMS (CONTAINERS)

Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Fail 1962. (Valley of
the Drums, Bullitt County, Kentucky).
See 0947

DUPONT/OBERLIN MICROFILTRATION
TREATMENT

Technology Demonstration Summary,
DuPont/Oberlin Miorofiitration System, Pal-
merton, Pennsylvania. April-May 1992,
See 1336

Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration of the DuPont/Oberlin
Mlcrofiltratlon Technology.

See 1350

DUPONT/OBERUN MICROFILTRATION
TREATMENT SYSTEM

DuPont/Oberlin Miorofiitration Technology.
Applications Analysis Report.

See 1584

Demonstration of Miorofiitration Technology.
See 1228
EARTH FILLS

Conducting Remedial Investigations/Feasi-
bility Studies for CERCLA Municipal Landfill
Sites.

See 1084

Guidance Documents Relating to Landfills
and Contaminants.

See 1289

International Waste Technologies/Geo-Con
In situ Stabilization/Solidification; Applica-
tions Analysis Report.

See 1567

Streamlining the RI/FS for CERCLA Munici-
pal Landfill Sites.

See 1118

Streamlining the RI/FS for CERCLA Munici-
pal Landfill Sites.

See 1119

Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Powers-
viite ate Profile, Peach County, Georgia).
See 0958

Technology Evaluation Report: International
Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabili-
zation/Solidification. Volume 3. Update
Report.

See 1567

Technology Evaluation Report: International
Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabili-
zation/Solidification. Volume 4. Update
Report.

See 156S
ECOLOGY

ECO Update: Ecological Assessment of Su-
perfund Sites. An Overview. Volume 1,
Number 2, December 1991.

See 1019

ECO Update: The Role of BTAGs in Ecologi-
cal Assessment. Volume 1, Number 1, Sep-
tember 1991.

See 1020

ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 4. Develop-
ing a Work Scope for Ecological Assess-
ments.

See 1022

ECO Update, Volume 1, Number 5, August
1992. Briefing the STAG: Initial Description
of Setting, History, and Ecology of a Site.
See 1023

Ecological Risk Assessment Methods: A
Review and Evaluation of Past Practices in
the Superfund and RCRA (Resource Conser-
vation and Recovery Act) Programs (Execu-
tive Summary Included).

See 1024

Ecological Risk Management in the Super-
fund and RCRA (Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act) Programs.

See 1025

Nature and Extent of Ecological Risks at Su-
perfund Sites and RCRA (Resource Conser-
vation and Recovery Act) Facilities (Execu-
tive Summary Included).

See 1060

Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 2. Environmental Evaluation Manual.
See 1072

Summary of Ecological Risks, Assessment
Methods, and Risk Management Decisions
in Superfund and RCRA (Resource Conser-
vation and Recovery Act).

See 1077
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

Estimation of the Cost of Using Chemical
Protective Clothing.

See 1244
ECONOMIC ASSISTANCE

Compendium of Federal Financial Assist-
ance Programs: Targeting Programs for
State and Local Ground-Water Protection.
See 1435
ECOSYSTEMS

Ecosystem Effects of Superfund, Nations!
Priority List Sites in Industrial Landscapes: A
Framework for Policy Decisions.

See 0135
ELDERLY PERSONS

Community Relations: Use of Senior Envi-
ronmental Employees in Superfund (Super-
fund Management Review: Recommendation
43.K.L),

See 0086
ELECTRIC BATTERIES

Control Technologies for Remediation of
Contaminated Soil and Waste Deposits at
Superfund Lead Battery Recycling Sites.
See 1221
ELECTHOACOUSTIC WAVES

Development of Electro-Acoustic Soil De-
contamination (ESD) Process for In situ Ap-
plications.

See 1498
ELECTROCOAGULATION

Alternating Current Electrocoagulation for
Superfund Site Remediation.

See 1192
ELECTRODYNAMICS

Use of Electrokinetics for Hazardous Waste
Site Remediation.

See 1366
ELECTROKINETICS

Removal of Radionuclides by Electrokinelic
Soil Processing.

See 1631
ELECTROLYTIC RESPIROMETRY

Respirometrie Methods for Determination of
Biodegradability and Biodegradation Kinetics
for Hazardous Organic Pollutant Com-
pounds.

See 1427

SU-18

-------
SUBJECT INDEX

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS

EMERGENCIES

Communicating with the Public About Haz-
ardous Materials: An Examination ot Local
Practice, Risk Communication Series.
See 0464

Emergency Response Cleanup Services
Contracts (ERCS). Users Manual.

See 0024

National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pol-
lution Contingency Plan (The NCP).

See 0146
EMERGENCY PLANNING

Superfund Emergency Response Actions; A
Summary of Federally-Funded Removals.
Fifth Annual Report - Fiscal Year 1990.
See 0313

Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally Funded Removals.
Fourth Annual Report - Fiscal Year 1989.
Sae 0314

Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally-Funded Removals.
Sixth Annual Report, Fiscal Year 1901.
See 031S
EMERGENCY PLANS

Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally Funded Removals.
Volume 3.

See 0318
EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

Health and Safety Audit Guidelines: SARA
Title I, Section 126.

See 0916

EMERGENCY RESPONSE NOTIFICATION
SYSTEM

CERCLA Notifications: Emergency Re-
sponse Notification System {ERNS) Fact
Sheet.

See 0926

Continuous Release-Emergency Response
Notification System and Priority Assessment
Model: Model Documentation.

Sea 1143

Continuous Release-Emergency Response
Notification System and Priority Assessment
Model: User's Manual for EPA Regions.
Set 1144

Emergency Response Notification System.
See 0927

Oil Notifications: Emergency Response Noti-
fication System (ERNS) Fact Sheet.
See 0930

Overview of ERNS: Emergency Response
Notification System (ERNS) Fact Sheet.
See 0935

EMERGENCY RESPONSE PROGRAM

Superfund Emergency Response Actions: A
Summary of Federally-Funded Removals.
Fifth Annual Report - Fiscal Year 1990.
See 0313
EMERGENCY SERVICES

Emergency Responders Agreements for
Fund-Lead Remedial Actions.

See 1001
EMISSION FACTORS

Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Database of Emission Rate
Measurement Projects.

See 1379

Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Emission Factors for Super-
fund Remediation Technologies.

See 1381

Evaluation of Emission Factors for Formal-
dehyde from Certain Wood Processing Oper-
ations. Final Report, May-August 1989.
See 1410

EMISSION RATES

Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Development of Example Pro-
cedures for Evaluating the Air Impacts of
Soil Excavation Associated with Superfund
Remedial Actions.

See 1380
EMISSIONS

Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Models for Estimating Air
Emission Rates from Superfund Remedial
Actions.

See 1388
ENCAPSULATING

Technology Evaluation Report SITE Program
Demonstration Test, HAZCON Solidification,
Douglassville, Pennsylvania. Volume 1.
See 1569
ENCAPSULATION

Description of EPA SITE Demonstration of
the HAZCON Stabilization Process at the
Douglassville, Pennsylvania Superfund Site.
See 1SS2

SITE Demonstration of the CHEMFIX Solidi-
fication/Stabilization Process at the Portable
Equipment Salvage Company Site.

See 1559
ENDANGERMENT ASSESSMENT

Endangerment Assessment Guidance.
See 0527
ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT

Recent Advances in Risk Reduction Engi-
neering.

See 1064
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING

AuloMOUSE: An Improvement to the
MOUSE Computerized Uncertainty Analysis
System Operational Manual.

See 1201
ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE

Communicating with the Public About Haz-
ardous Materials; An Examination of Local
Practice. Risk Communication Series.
See 0464

Superfund Fact Sheet: Benzene.

See 0469

Superfund Fact Sheet: PCBs.

See 0492

Superfund Fact Sheet: Trichloroethylene.
See 0496

ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE PATHWAY

Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Volume 1. Overview of Air
Pathway Assessments for Superfund Sites
(Revised).

See 1391

Superfund Fact Sheet: Exposure Pathways.
See 0393
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH

Health Effects Assessment for Benzene.
See 1035

Health Effects Assessment for Cadmium.
See 1036

Health Effects Assessment for Carbon Tet-
rachloride.

See 1037

Health Effects Assessment for Chlordane,
See 1036

Health Effects Assessment for Chloroben-

zene.

See 1039

Health Effects Assessment for Chloroform.
See 1040

Health Effects Assessment for DDT.
See 1041

Health Effects Assessment for Methyt Ethyl

Ketone.

See 1042

Health Effects Assessment for Methylene

Chloride.

See 1043

Health Effects Assessment for Naphthalene.
See 1044

Health Effects Assessment for Phenol.
See 1048

Health Effects Assessment for Styrene.
See 1046

Health Effects Assessment for Tetrachlor-

oelhylene.

Sae 1047

Health Effects Assessment for Trichterotthy-
lene.

See 1048

Health Effects Assessment for Xylenes.
See 1049

Health Effects Assessment tor 2,4,5-Trichior-
ophenoxy Acetic Add (2,4,5-T).

See 1050

Supplemental Guidance to RAGS: Calculat-
ing the Concentration Term. Volume 1,
Number 1, May 1982.

See 1079

Updated Health Effects Assessment for Ace-
tone.

See 1080

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTS

Assessing Potential Indoor Air Impacts for
Superfund Sites. Air/Superfund National
Technical Guidance Study Series.

See 1395

AutoMOUSE: An Improvement to the
MOUSE Computerized Uncertainty Analyse
System Operational Manual.

See 1201

Health Effects Assessment Summary

Tables.

See 1051

Health Effects Assessment Summary

Tables.

See 1052

Health Effects Assessment Summary

Tables.

See 1013

Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables
Fourth Quarter FY 1989.

See 1054

Preliminary Ranking Evaluation Scoro
(PREscore) Version 1.1 (for Microcomput-
ers).

See 0372

On-Site Methods for Assessing Chemical
Impact on the Soil Environment Using Earth-
worms: A Case Study at the Saird and
McGuIre Superfund Site, Holbrook, Massa-
chusetts.

See 1521
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS

Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Estimation of Air Impacts for
Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE) Systems.
See 1383

CERCLA (Comprehensive Environmental Re-
sponse, Compensation and Liability Act)
Compliance with Other Laws Manual: Part 2,
Clean Mr Act and Other Environmental Stat-
utes and State Requirements.

See 0413

Evaluating Amphibian Responses in Wet-
lands Impacted by Mining Activities In the
Western United States.

See 1586

SU-19

-------
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES

SUBJECT INDEX

ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES

Harmonization of QA Procedures (or Envi-
ronmental Data Operations: Development of
a National Consensus Standard for Quality
Assurance for Environmental Programs.
See 0989
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

Future of Expert Systems in the Environmen-
tal Protection Agency.

See 1257
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING

Environmental Monitoring Methods Index
(EMMI), Version 1.0 (5 - User LAN) (for
Microcomputers).

See 1238

Environmental Monitoring Methods Index
(EMM!), Version 1.0 (lor Microcomputers).
See 1239

Environmental Monitoring Methods Index
(EMMI), Version 1.0 (Unlimited User LAN)
(for Microcomputers).

See 1240

international Symposium on Field Screening
Methods for Hazardous Wastes and Toxic
Chemicals (2nd), Proceedings. Held in Las
Vegas, Nevada on February 12-14, 1991.
See 1279

Asymmetric Loss Function for Super fund Re-
mediation Decisions.

See 1200
ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANTS
Evaluation of Exposure Markers.

See 1246

ENVIRONMENTAL PRIORITIES INITIATIVES

Guidance for Environmental Priorities Initia-
tive (EPI) Facilities in the Superfund Pre-Re-
madiai Program.

See 0341
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

Understanding Oil Spills and Oil Spill Re-
sponse.

See 0878

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Mentor-Protege Program.

See 0044

OSWER Integrated Health and Safety Policy.
See 0920
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH

Assessment of International Technologies
for Superfund Applications: Technology
Review and Trip Report Results.

See 1197

Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
Incineration Research Facility: Annual
Report for FY80.

See 1483

Role of Health Research in Support of
EPA's Regulatory Programs.

See 1074
ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEYS

Chemical Dehalogenation Treatability Stud-
ies under CEHCLA: An Overview.

See 1209

Continuous Release-Emergency Response
Notification System and Priority Assessment
Model: Model Documentation.

See 1143

Continuous Release-Emergency Response
Notification System and Priority Assessment
Model: User's Manual for EPA Regions.
See 1144

Emergency Response Notification System.
See 0927

Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Chemical Dehalogenation.
See 1161

Health and Safety Audit Guidelines: SARA
Title I, Section 126.

See 0916

Health Effects Assessment for Benzene.
See 1035

Health Effects Assessmenl for Cadmium.
See 1036

Health Effects Assessment for Carbon Tet-
rachloride.

See 1037

Health Effects Assessment lor Chlordane.
See 1038

Health Effects Assessment for Chioroben-

zene.

See 1039

Health Effects Assessment for Chloroform.
See 1040

Health Effects Assessment lor DDT.
See 1041

Health Effects Assessment for Methyl Ethyl

Ketone.

See 1042

Health Effects Assessment for Methylene

Chloride.

See 1043

Health Effects Assessment for Naphthalene.
See 1044

Health Effects Assessment for Phenol.
See 1045

Health Effects Assessment for Styrene.
See 1046

Health Effects Assessment for Tetrachlor-

oethylene.

See 1047

Health Effects Assessment for Trichloroethy-
lene.

See 1048

Health Effects Assessment for Xylenes.
See 1049

Health Effects Assessment for 2,4,5-Trichlor-
ophenoxy Acetic Acid (2,4,5-T).

See 1050

Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version

2) (for Microcomputers).

See 0036

Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software (ILM02.1 Version

3) (for Microcomputers).

See 0037

Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System (ICCSS) Software (SOW March
1990) (Version 1) (for Microcomputers).
See 0040

Inorganic Contract Compliance Screening
System Software for the PC (SOW March
1990 Version 1). User Manual.

See 0041

Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (OLMOI.8 Ver-
sion 3) (for Microcomputers).

See 0050

Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (SOW February
1988) (for Microcomputers).

See 0054

Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (SOW March
1990) (Version 1) (for Microcomputers).
See (3055

Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System (OCCSS) Software (SOW OLM01.6
Version January 1992) (Version 1) (for
Microcomputers).

See 0058

Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System. Software for the PC (OLM01.6 Ver-
sion 1). User Manual.

See 0057

Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System. Software for the PC (SOW March
1990, Version 1). User Manual.

See 0059

Organic Contract Compliance Screening
System. Software for tie PC (Version June
1990). User Manual.

See 0080

PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score)
User's Manual and Tutorial. Version 2.1.
See 0367

PA-Seore (Preliminary Assessment Score),
Version 1.0 (for Microcomputers).

See 0368

PA-Score Software, Version 1.0. Users
Manual and Tutorial.

See 0371

Tracking Toxic Substances at Industrial Fa-
cilities: Engineering Mass Balance versus
Materials Accounting.

See 1362

Updated Health Effects Assessment for Ace-
tone.

See 1080
ENVIRONMENTAL TESTS

Future of Expert Systems in the Environmen-
tal Protection Agency.

See 1257
ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSPORT

Determining Soil Response Action Levels
Based on Potential Contaminant Migration to
Ground Water: A Compendium of Examples.
See 1497

Facilitated Transport. Series of Issue Papers

(3rd).

See 1451

New Approach and Methodologies for Char-
acterizing the Hydrogeologlc Properties of
Aquifers.

See 1470

Review and Evaluation of Area Source Dis-
persion Algorithms for Emission Sources at
Superfund Sites.

See 1416
EPA REGION 1

Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1880:
EPA Region 1.

See 1174

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by ate for Region 1.

See 0738

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 1, September
26, 1991.

See 0838

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 1 - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).

See 0849
EPA REGION 10

Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 10.

See 1183

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10.

See 0782

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 10, Septem-
ber 26, 1991.

See 0847

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 10-3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).

See 0867

SU-20

-------
SUBJECT INDEX

FACILITIES

EPA REGION 2

Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 2.

See 1175

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Sit# for Region 2,

See 0743

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 2, September
26,1991.

See 0839

Sits Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 2-3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).

See 0851
EPA REQION 3

Notification ol Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980;
EPA Region 3,

Sea 1176

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Region 3.

See 0748

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 3, September
26,1991,

See 0840

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 3-3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).

See 0853
EPA REGION 4

Environmental Compliance Branch, Standard
Operating Procedures and Quality Assurance
Manual, Revision 1.

See 0S35

Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 4.

See 1177

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4.

See 07S2

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 4, September
26, 1991.

See 0841

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 4-3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).

See 085S
EPA REQION 5

Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 5.

See 1178

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5.

See 0757

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 5, September
26, 1991.

See 0842

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 5-3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).

See 0857

EPA REGION 6

Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 6.

See 1179

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6.

See 0762

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region S, September
26, 1991.

See 0843

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 6-3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible} (for Microcomputers).

See 0859
EPA REGION 7

Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 7,

See 1180

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7.

See 0767

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Report by Site for Region 7, September
26, 1991.

See 0844

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 7-3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).

See 0861
EPA REGION 8

Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 8.

See 1181

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8.

See 0772

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 8-3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).

See 0863
EPA REGION 9

Notification ol Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 9.

See 1182

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9.

See 0777

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Report by Site for Region 9, September
26,1991.

See 0846

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(Region 9-3 1/2 Inch Diskette IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).

See 0865
EQUIPMENT

Field Standard Operating Procedures for the
Decontamination of Response Personnel
F.S.O.P. No. 7.

See 0913
EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS

Specifications and Guidance for Contami-
nant-Free Sample Containers.

See 0994

ERNS SYSTEM

Emergency Response Notification System.
See 0927
ETHYLENE/TRICHLORO

Superfund Fact Sheet: Triehloroethylene.
See 0496
EXCAVATION

Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series, Development of Example Pro-
cedures tor Evaluating the Air impacts of
Soil Excavation Associated with Superfund
Remedial Actions.

See 1380
EXPEDITED RESPONSE ACTION
Expedited Response Actions,

See 1003
EXPERT SYSTEMS

Future of Expert Systems in the Environmen-
tal Protection Agency.

See 1257

PAST: The Potential ARARs Selection Tool.
See 0434
EXPOSURE

Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual.
Supplemental Guidance: 'Standard Default
Exposure Factors".

See 1071

SARA (Superfund Amendments and Reau-
thorization Act) Section 313 Roadmaps Data
Base. User's Manual. Version 2.10.

See 0304
EXTRACTION

Applications Analysis Report SITE Program,
CF Systems Qrganics Extraction System,
New Bedford, Massachusetts.

See 1196

Citizen's Guide to Solvent Extraction.
See 0459

Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
edies: Phase 2. Volume 1. Summary Report.
See 1444

Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
edies: Phase 2. Volume 2. Case Studies and
Updates.

See 1445

Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
edies. Volume 2. Case Studies 1-19.
See 1446

Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
edies. Volume 3, General Site Data: Data
Base Reports.

See 1447

In situ Soil Vapor Extraction Treatment.
See 1511

In situ Steam Extraction Treatment
See 1512

Literature Review Summary of Metals Ex-
traction Processes Used to Remove Lead
from Soils.

See 1518

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Ground
Water Extraction Systems.

See 1443

Terra Vac In situ Vacuum Extraction System:
Applications Analysis Report.

See 1355
EXXON VALDEZ

Exxon Valdez Oil Spill, A Report to the
President.

See 0928
FACILITIES

CERCLA Off-Site Policy - Eligibility of Facili-
ties in Assessment Monitoring.

See 0414

SU-21

-------
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT

SUBJECT INDEX

Compendium of Federal FacBities Directives,
1984 and 1985.

See 0896
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT
Facility Response Plans,

See 0929
FACILITY RESPONSE PLAN
Facility Response Plans,

See 0929

FCTS (FIELD CERTIFICATION TRACKING
SYSTEM)

Field Certification Tracking System (FCTS).
User's Guide. Version 2.1.

See 0909
FEASIBILITY

Guidance for Evaluating the Technical Im-
practicability of Ground-Water Restoration.
See 1460
FEDERAL AGENCIES

Harmonization of QA Procedures for Envi-
ronmental Data Operations: Development of
a National Consensus Standard for Quality
Assurance tor Environmental Programs.
See 0989
FEDERAL BUDGETS

Accessing the $50 Million Set-Aside in the
Remedial Action Budget for Quick Response
at National Priorities List Sites.

See 1082
FEDERAL FACILITIES

Guidance for Federal Facilities on Release
Notification Requirements under CERCLA
and SARA Title III.

See 0898
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

Compendium of Federal Facilities Directives,
1984 and 1985.

See 0896
FEDERAL LAW

Debarment and Suspension.

See 0470
FILTRATION

Membrane Treatment of Wood Preserving
Site Groundwater by SBP Technologies, Inc.
Applications Analysis Report.

See 1468

Engineered Biofilter for Removing Organic
Contaminants in Air.

See 1403

Filtration of Ground Water Samples for
Metals Analysis.

See 1454

SITE Program Demonstration of the SBP
Technologies, Inc., Membrane Filtration
System on Creosote-Contaminated Water.
See 1S92

Site Emerging Technologies: Bioscrubber for
Removing Hazardous Organic Emissions
from Soli, Water and Air Decontamination
Processes.

See 1302
FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE

Superfund Technical Assistance Grant
(TAG) Handbook: Applying for Your Grant,
See 0500

Superfund Technical Assistance Grant
(TAG) Handbook: The Application Forms
with Instructions.

See 0501
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Listing Alphabetically by PRP
Name.

See OS 16

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1.

See 0739

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2.

See 0744

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4.

See 0753

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5.

See 0758

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6.

See 0763

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7.

See 0768

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8.

See 0773

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10.

See 0783
FINANCING

Evaluating Mixed Funding Settlements under

CERCLA.

See 0537

Interim Policy on Mixed Funding Settlements
Involving the Preauthorizatlon of States or
Political Subdivisions.

See 0568
FIRE DEPARTMENTS

Hazmat Team Planning Guidance.

See 0915
FLORIDA

National Priorities List Sites: Florida.
See 0174

National Priorities List Sites: Florida.
See 0175

National Priorities List Sites: Florida, 1992.
See 0176

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Florida.

See 0645

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Florida.

See 0646

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Florida.

See 0647
FOAM

Foam Scrubbing (Chapter 9).

See 1411
FOAM SCRUBBING

Foam Scrubbing (Chapter 9).

See 1411
FOREIGN TECHNOLOGY

Assessment of International Technologies
for Superfund Applications: Technology
Review and Trip Report Results.

See 1197

International Evaluation of In-situ Biorestora-
tlon of Contaminated Soil and Groundwater
(September 1990)-Translation.

See 1517

Toronto Harbour Commissioners (THC) Soil
Recycle Treatment Train. Applications Analy-
sis Report.

See 1544
FORMALDEHYDE

Evaluation of Emission Factors for Formal-
dehyde from Certain Wood Processing Oper-
ations. Final Report, May-August 1989.
See 1410

FOURIER TRANSFORM SPECTROMETERS

Use of a Fourier Transform Spectrometer as
a Remote Sensor at Superfund Sites.
See 1365

FRAUD

Criminal Investigations and the Superfund
Program.

See 0469
FUGITIVE EMISSIONS

Foam Scrubbing (Chapter 8).

See 1411
FULLERTON (CALIFORNIA)

Demonstration of a Trial Excavation at the
McColl Superfund Site.

See 1226

Technology Evaluation Report: ate Program
Demonstration of a Trial Excavation at the
McColl Superfund Site.

See 1349
FULTON (NEW YORK)

Superfund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Fulton
Terminals Site Profile, Oswego County, NY).
See 0955
FUND-BALANCING WAIVERS

ARARs Q's and A's: The Fund-Balancing
Waiver.

See 0403
FUNDS

Debarment and Suspension.

See 0470

Political Subdivision Involvement in Super-
fund.

See 0480
GAS ANALYSIS

Compendium of ERT Field Analytical Proce-
dures.

See 0902
GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY

Evaluation of Portable Gas Chromatographs.
See 1479
GAS INJECTION

Accutech Pneumatic Fracturing Extraction
and Hot Gas Injection, Phase 1. Applications
Analysis Report.

See 1190
GENERATOR SETTLEMENTS

Waiver of Concurrence on De Minimis Gen-
erator Settlements.

See 0892

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS

Summary of GIS Support to Superfund.
See 1307
GEORGIA

National Priorities List Sites: Georgia.
See 0177

National Priorities List Sites: Georgia,
See 0178

National Priorities List Sites: Georgia, 1892,
See 0179

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.

See 0848

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.

See 0649

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.

See 0650

Superlund at Work: Hazardous Waste Clean-
up Efforts Nationwide, Spring 1993 (Powers-
ville Site Profile, Peach County, Georgia).
See 0958
GLYCOLIC ACID

Innovative Technology: Gtycolate Dehalo-
ge nation.

See 1513

SU-22

-------
SUBJECT INDEX

GROUND WATER

GLYCOLS

Citizen's Guide to Glycolate Dehalogenatlon,
See 0454
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES

Compendium of Good Ideas*. Models of Suc-
cess and Lessons Learned. Volume 2.
Source Book,

See 0134
GOVERNMENT POLICIES

Considerations in Ground-Water Remedi-
ation at Superfund Sites and RCRA Facili-
ties: Update.

See 143?

Discussions with the Public Concerning NPL

Listings.

See 0339

Evaluating Mixed Funding Settlements under

CERCLA,

See 0537

Interim Policy on Mixed Funding Settlements
Involving the Preauthorization of States or
Political Subdivisions.

See 0566

NPL Construction Completion Definition at
Bioremediation and Soil Vapor Extraction
Sites.

See 0365

Policy Towards Owners of Residential Prop-
erty at Superfund Sites.

See 0587

Presumptive Remedies: Policy and Proce-
dures.

See 1103

RCRA, Superfund Monthly Hot Line Reports.
See 0303

Revision of PoBcy Regarding Superfund
Project Assignment between Alternative Re-
medial Contracting Strategy Contractors and
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

See 0068

Superfund Policy Forum Update, Volume 1,
Number 1, February 1992.

See 0324
GRANTS

Superfund Technical Assistance Grants Pro-
gram: Regional Guidance Manual.

See 0504
GRANULAR ACTIVATED CARBON
TREATMENT

Granular Activated Carbon Treatment. Engi-
neering Bulletin.

See 1258
GREAT LAKES

Dealing with Toxic Polluted Sediments in the
Great Lakes Basin.

See 1582
GROUND WATER

Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Comparisons of Air Stripper
Simulations and Field Performance Data.
See 1376

ARARs Q's and A's: State Ground-Water
Antidegradation Issues.

See 0402

Basic Concepts of Contaminant Sorption at
Hazardous Waste Sites (Ground Water
issue).

See 1431

CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWs; Guid-
ance Manual.

See 1576

Chemical Enhancements to Pump-and-Treat
Remediation. Ground Water Issue.

See 1434

Compendium of ERT Groundwater Sampling

Procedures.

See 0903

Compendium of Federal Financial Assist-
ance Programs: Targeting Programs for
State and Local Ground-Water Protection.
See 1435

Considerations in Ground-Water Remedi-
ation at Superfund Sites and RCRA Facul-
ties: Update.

See 1437

Determining Soil Response Action Levels
Based on Potential Contaminant Migration to
Ground Water: A Compendium of Examples.
See 1497

Emerging Technologies: Bio Recovery Sys-
tems Removal and Recovery of Metal Ions
from Groundwater.

See 1439

Emerging Technologies: Bio-Recovery Sys-
tems Removal and Recovery of Metal Ions
from Groundwater. Appendices.

See 1440

Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
edies: Phase 2. Volume 1. Summary Report.
See 1444

Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
edies: Phase 2. Volume 2. Case Studies and
Updates.

See 1445

Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
edies. Volume 2. Case Studies 1-19.
See 1446

Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
edies. Volume 3. General ate Data: Data
Base Reports.

See 1447

Evaluation of Soil Venting Application.
Ground Water Issue.

See 1505

Evaluation of Unsaturated/Valdose Zone
Models for Superfund Sites.

See 1449

Facilitated Transport. Series of Issue Papers

(3rd).

See 1451

Forum on Innovative Hazardous Waste
Treatment Technologies: Domestic and
International. Held in Atlanta, Georgia on
June 19-21,1989. Abstract Proceedings.
See 1252

Ground-Water Issue: Characterizing Soils for
Hazardous Waste Site Assessments.
See 1455

Ground-Water Issue: Potential Sources of
Error in Ground-Water Sampling at Hazard-
ous Waste Sites.

See 1456

Ground Water Sampling for Metals Analyses.
Superfund Ground Water Issue.

See 1459

Guidance for Evaluating the Technical Im-
practicability of Ground-Water Restoration.
See 1460

Guide on Remedial Actions for Contaminat-
ed Ground Water.

See 1461

Identification and Compilation of Unsaturat-
ed/Vadose Zone Models.

See 1464

In-situ Bioremediation of Contaminated
Ground Water.

See 1465

In situ Steam Extraction Treatment.

See 1512

In situ Treatment of Contaminated Ground
Water: An Inventory of Research and Field
Demonstrations and Strategies for Improving
Ground Water Remediation Technologies.
See 1466

Innovative Treatment Technologies: Semi-
Annual Status Report (Fourth Edition).
See 1273

International Evaluation of In-situ Biorestcra-
tion of Contaminated Soil and Groundwater
(September 1990)~Translation.

See 1517

Methods for Evaluating the Attainment of
Clear*? Standards. Volume 2. Ground
Water.

See 1469

New Approach and Methodologies for Char-
acterizing the Hydrogeologio Properties of
Aquifers.

See 1470

Performance Evaluations of Pump-and-Treat

Remediations.

See 1471

Potential Sources of Error In Ground-Water
Sampling at Hazardous Waste Sites. Ground
Water Issue.

See 1472

Presentations EPA-State Sal Standards
Conference. Held In Crystal City, Virginia on
January 29,1991.

See 1524

Remediation Completed: But Is the Ground-
water Meeting the Safe Drinking Water Act
Requirements. Hazteeh International 80.
Held in Houston, Texas on May 8-10, 1890.
See 1473

Advanced Oxidation Technologies for the
Treatment of Contaminated Groundwater.
See 1429

Blodegradation of Creosote and Pentachlor-
ophenol In Contaminated Groundwater:
Chemical and Biological Assessment.
Sea 1432

Detoxification of Pentachlorophenol and Cre-
osote Contaminated Groundwater by Physi-
cal Extraction: Chemical and Biological As-
sessment,

Sea 1438

EPA Site Demonstration of BioTrol Aqueous
Treatment System.

Sea 1441

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Ground
Water Extraction Systems.

Sea 1443

Extraction of Mercury from Groundwater
Using Immobilized Algae.

Qqq -j 450

Field Demonstration of the UV/Oxidation
Technology to Treat Ground Water Contami-
nated with VOCs,

See 1452

Field Evaluation of the UV/Oxidatlon Tech-
nology to Treat Contaminated Groundwater.
Proceedings of the National Conference
(10th). Held in Washington, DC. on Novem-
ber 27-29, 1989.

See 1453

Filtration of Ground Water Samples for
Metals Analysis,

See 1454

Remediation of Contaminated Soils by Sol-
vent Flushing.

See 1529

ROD Annual Report, FY1891. Volume 1.
See 1113

ROD Annual Report, FY1991. Volume 2.
See 1114

Subsurface Contamination Reference Guide.
See 1474

Superfund Ground Water Issue: Accuracy of
Depth to Water Measurements. 2nd in
Series of Issue Papers.

See 1476

Superfund Ground Water Issue. Contaminant
Transport in Fractured Media: Models for
Decision Makers.

See 1477

SU-23

-------
GROUND WATER MOVEMENT

SUBJECT INDEX

Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
(SITE) Program Evaluation Report for Antox
BTX Water Screen (BTX Immunoassay).
See 1320

Superfund Remedial Action Decision Proc-
ess: Database for Selected FY87 Records of
Decision.

See 1136

Tech Trends (Number 6).

See 1328

Technology Evaluation Report: SITE Pro-
gram Demonstration of the Ultrox Interna-
tional Ultraviolet Radiation/Oxidation Tech-
nology.

See 1351

Ultrox International Ultraviolet Radiation/Oxi-
dation Technology: Applications Analysis
Report,

See 1364

Vendor Information System for Innovative
Treatment Technologies (VISITT). Number 1.
See 1370
GROUND WATER MOVEMENT

Ground-Water Modeling Compendium.
Model Fact Sheets, Descriptions, Applica-
tions and Assessment Framework.

See 1458
GROUNDWATER

ROD Annual Report, FY 1990.

See 1112
GROVELAND (MASSACHUSETTS)

Terra Vac In situ Vacuum Extraction System:
Applications Analysis Report.

See 1358
GUAM

National Priorities List Sites: American
Samoa, Guam, and the Trust Territories.
See 0164

National Priorities List Sites: The United
States Territories, 1992.

See 0275
GUAM AND TRUST TERRITORIES

National Priorities List Sites: American
Samoa, Guam and Trust Territories.
See 0155
GUIDANCE

Guidance on Oversight of PRP Performed
RD/RA.

See 1130
GUIDELINES

Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series, Contingency Plans at Super-
fund Sites Using Air Monitoring.

See 1378

Assessing Reports of Continuous Releases
of Hazardous Substances: A Guide for EPA
Regions.

See 1142

CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual: CERCLA Compliance with the CWA
and SDWA,

See 0406

CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual: Guide to Manual.

See 0407

Compliance with Third Third Requirements
Under the LDRs. Superfund LDR Guide No.
8.

See 0418

Data Quality Objectives for Remedial Re-
sponse Activities: Development Process. Ex-
ample Scenario: RI/FS Activities at a Site
with Contaminated Soils and Ground Water,
See 0980

Final Guidance on Implementation of the
'Consistency' Exemption to the Statutory
Limits on Removal Actions.

See 1004

Guidance Documents Relating to Landfills
and Contaminants.

See 1259

Guidance on EPA Oversight of Remedial De-
signs and Remedial Actions Performed by
Potentially Responsible Parties.

See 1128

Guidance on Expediting Remedial Design
and Remedial Action.

See 1129

Guide on Remedial Actions at Superfund
Sites with PCB Contamination,

See 1262

Guide to Delisting of RCRA Wastes for Su-
perfund Remedial Responses.

See 0422

Guide to Developing Superfund Proposed

Plans.

See 1099

Guide to Selecting Superfund Remedial Ac-
tions.

See 1100

Interim RCRA/CERCLA Guidance on Non-
Contiguous Sites and On-Site Management
on Waste and Treatment Residue.

See 0427

Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatability Vari-
ance for Removal Actions. Superfund LDR
Guide No. 6B.

See 0430

Quality Assurance/Quality Control Guidance
for Removal Activities: Sampling QA/QC
Plan and Data Validation Procedures.
See 0993

Removal Cost Management System: Version
3.2,

See 1009

Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual,
Part A, April 1990.

See 1066

Sampler's Guide to the Contract Laboratory

Program.

See 0071

Scoper's Notes: An RI/FS Costing Guide.
Bringing in a Quality RI/FS on Time and
Within Budget.

See 1117

Superfund LDR Guide No. 1: Overview of
RCRA Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs).
See 0440

Superfund LDR Guide No. 2: Complying with
the California List Restrictions under Land
Disposal Restrictions (LDRs).

See 0441

Superfund LDR Guide No. 3: Treatment
Standards and Minimum Technology Re-
quirements under Land Disposal Restrictions
(LDRS),

See 0442

Superfund LDR Guide No, 4: Complying with
the Hammer Restrictions under Land Dis-
posal Restrictions (LDRs).

See 0443

Superfund LDR Guide No. 5: Determining
When Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) Are
'Applicable' to CERCLA Response Actions.
See 0444

Superfund Removal Procedures: Action
Memorandum Guidance.

See 1012
GUIDES (INSTRUCTIONS)

User's Guide to Contract Laboratory Pro-
gram.

See 0078
HABITABIUTY

Evaluating Amphibian Responses in Wet-
lands Impacted by Mining Activities in the
Western United States.

See 1586

HALOGEN ORGANIC COMPOUNDS

Chemical Dehalogenafion Treatment APEG
Treatment.

See 1210
HANDBOOKS

Community Relations in Superfund: A Hand-
book.

See 0467

Endangerment Assessment Handbook.
See 0530

Handbook: Responding to Discharges of
Sinking Hazardous Substances.

See 1589

Superfund Reauthorization: NACEPT Sub-
committee Handbook.

See 0331
HAWAII

National Priorities List Sites: California and

Hawaii.

See 0163

National Priorities List Sites: California and
Hawaii, 1992.

See 0164

National Priorities List Sites: Hawaii.
See 0180
HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM

Closing the NPL Book under the Original

HRS.

See 0337

Hazard Ranking System Guidance Manual,
See 0346

Hazard Ranking System Guidance Manual,
See 0347

PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score),
Version 2.1, 3 1/2 inch (for Microcomput-
ers).

See 0369

PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score),
Version 2.1, 5 1/4 inch (for Microcomput-
ers).

See 0370

Preliminary Ranking Evaluation Score
(PREscore) Version 1.1 (for Microcomput-
ers).

See 0372

Revised Hazard Ranking System: An Im-
proved Tool for Screening Superfund Sites.
See 0377

Revised Hazard Ranking System: Back-
ground Information.

See 0378

Revised Hazard Ranking System: Qs and
As.

See 0381
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

Abstract Proceedings: Forum on Innovative
Hazardous Waste Treatment Technologies;
Domestic and International (2nd). Held in
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on May 15-17,
1900.

See 1186

Abstract Proceedings: Superfund Technical
Support Project General Meeting. Held in
Athens, Georgia on December 3-6,1990.
See 1187

Accelerating Potentially Responsible Party
Remedial Design Starts: Implementing the
30-Day Study.

See 0508

Accessing Federal Data Bases for Contami-
nated Site Clean-Up Technologies.

See 1188

Accessing the $50 Million Set-Aside in the
RemeeSal Action Budget for Quick Response
at National Priorities List Sites,

See 1082

SU-24

-------
SUBJECT INDEX

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

Achieving Greater Consistency between
Subjective and Objective Risks,

Sea 1017

Administrative Guidance for the FIT to ARCS
(FIT/ARCS) Transition,

See 0017

Administrative Order orr Consent for Reme-
dial Investigations/Feasibility Study.

See 0S10

Adrrerrstrative Penalty Procedures,

Sea 0511

Advancing the Use of Treatment Technol-
ogies for Superfund Remedies.

See 1191

Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Series. Superfund Air Pathway Analyses
Review Criteria Checklists,

See 1372

Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Air Emissions from Area
Sources: Estimating Soil and Soil-Gas
Sample Number Requirements.

See 1373

Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series; Applicability of Open Path
Monitors for Superfund.

See 1375

Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Compilation of Information on
Real-Time Air Monitoring for Use at Super-
fund Sites.

See 1377

Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Estimation of Air Impacts for
Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE) Systems.
See 1383

Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series: Evaluation of Short-Term Air
Action Levels for Superfund Sites.

See 1386

Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series, Volume 1. Application of Air
Pathway Analyses for Superfund Activities.
See 1390

Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Volume 2, Estimation of Base-
line Air Emissions at Superfund Sites (Re-
vised).

See 1392

Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Volume 4. Guidance for Ambi-
ent Air Monitoring at Superfund Sites (Re-
vised).

See 1393

Air/Superfund National Technical Guidance
Study Series. Volume 4, Procedures for Dis-
persion Modeling and Air Monitoring for Su-
perfund Air Pathway Analysis.

See 1394

Amendment to Historical Definitions of NPL
Deletion Start and Completion Dates.
See 0S3S

American Combustion Pyretron Destruction
System. Applications Analysis Report,
See 1193

Analysis of State Superfund Programs: 50-
State Study.

See 0447

Analysis of State Superfund Programs: 50-
State Study, 1990 Update.

See 0448

Analysis ol State Superfund Programs: 50-
State Study. 1991 Update.

See 0449

Annual RREl Research Symposium (20th)
Abstract Proceedings. Held in Cincinnati,
Ohio on March 15-17, 1994.

Sea 1184

Applicability of Land Disposal Restrictions to
RCRA and CERCLA Ground Water Treat-
ment Reinjection Superfund Management
Review: Recommendation No. 26.

See 1430

Applications Analysis Report Silicate Tech-
nology Corporation's Solidification/Stabiliza-
tion Technology for Organic and Inorganic
Contaminants in Soils.

See 1550

Applications Analysis Report SITE Program,
CF Systems Organics Extraction System,
New Bedford, Massachusetts.

See 1196

Approval of Long Term Contracting Strategy
for Superfund (Superfund Management
Review: Recommendation E.2).

See 0018

ARAR's O's and A s. Compliance with the
Toxicity Characteristics Rule. Part 1.
See 0396

ARARs Fact Sheet: Compliance with the
Clean Air Act and Associated Air Quality Re-
quirements.

See 0397

ARARs Q's and A's.

See 0398

ARARS Q's and A's: Compliance with Fed-
eral Water Quality Criteria.

See 0399

ARARs Q's and A's: General Policy, RCRA,
CWA, SDWA, Post-ROD Information, and
Contingent Waivers.

See 0401

ARARs Q's and A's: State Ground-Water
Antidegradation Issues.

See 0402

ARARs Q's and A's: The Fund-Balancing

Waiver.

See 0403

Arbitration Procedures for Small Superfund
Cost Recovery Claims.

See 0S12

ARCS (Alternative Remedial Contract Strate-
gy) Contracts Users' Manual.

See 0019

ARCS Construction Contract Modification

Procedures.

See 0020

ARCS Work Assignment Management: Field

Guide.

See 0021

Assessing Potential Indoor Air Impacts for
Superfund Sites. Air/Superfund National
Technical Guidance Study Series.

See 1395

Assessing Reports of Continuous Releases
of Hazardous Substances: A Guide for EPA
Regions.

See 1142

Assessment of International Technologies
for Superfund Applications: Technology
Review and Trip Report Results.

See 1197

Assessment of Technologies for the Reme-
diation of Radioactively Contaminated Su-
perfund Sites.

See 1198

Assessment of Tentatively Identified Com-
pounds in Superfund Samples.

See 1199

Assurance of Hazardous Waste Capacity,
Guidance to State Officials. Assistance in
Fulfilling the Requirements of CERCLA
104(c)(9).

See 0129

ATSDR Health Consultations under

CERCLA.

See 1018

Audits and the Superfund Program Manager,
See 0087

Authority to Use CERCLA to Provide En-
forcement Funding Assistance to States.
See 0450

Authorization for Regional Administrators to
Approve Consistency Exemptions at NPL
Sites.

See 0998

AWD Technologies Integrated AquaDstox
(Trade Name)/SV£ Technology; Applications
Analysis Report
See 1202

Babcock and Wilcox Cyclone Furnace Vitrifi-
cation. Technology Demonstration Summary.
See 1203

Basic Concepts of Contaminant Sorption at
Hazardous Waste Sites (Ground Water
Issue).

See 1431

Bibliography of Federal Reports and Publica-
tions Describing Alternative and Innovative
Treatment Technologies for Corrective
Action and Site Remediation.

See 1206

Bioremediation: An Information Update on
Applying Bforemedlation to Site Cleanup.
See 1421

Bioremediation in the Field. An Information
Update on Applying Bioremediation to Site
Clean-Up, Number 3.

See 1422

Bioremediation in the Field: An Information
Update on Applying Bioremediation to Site
Cleanup. (Number 4).

See 1423

Bioremediation in the Field: Number 1, No-
vember 1990.

See 1424

Carver-Greenfield Process (Trade Name)
Dehydro-Tech Corporation. Applications
Analysis Report.

See 1207

CERCLA Community Relations Mailing Lists.
See 0451

CERCLA Compliance with Other Environ-
mental Statutes.

See 0404

CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual: CERCLA Compliance with the CWA
and SDWA.

See 0406

CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual: Guide to Manual.

See 0407

CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual: Overview of ARARs ~ Focus on
ARAB Waivers.

See 0408

CERCLA Compliance with Other Laws
Manual: RCRA ARARS-Focus on Closure
Requirements,

See 0410

CERCLA Compliance with the RCRA Toxici-
ty Character sties (TC) Rule: Part 2.

See 0412

CERCLA Enforcement Policy Compendium

Update.

See 0516

CERCLA Implementation of the Training Re-
quirements of EPA Order 3500.1. Inspector
Training.

See 0518

CERCLA Notifications: Emergency Re-
sponse Notification System (ERNS) Fact
Sheet.

Sq© 0926

CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWS
CERCLA Site Sampling Program: Detailed
Data Report.

See 1575

SU-25

-------
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

SUBJECT INDEX

CERCLA Site Discharges to POTWS Treat-
ability Manual.

See 1677

CERCLA/Superfund Orientation Manual.
See 0130

CERCLA Waste Capacity Assurance.
See 0131

CERCLIS Characterization Project: National

Results.

See 0001

CERCLIS Characterization Project; Region 1

Results.

See 0002

CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 2

Results.

See 0003

CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 3

Results.

See 0004

CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 4

Results.

See 0005

CERCUS Characterization Project: Region 5

Results.

See 0006

CERCLIS Characterization Project; Region 6

Resulta

See 0007

CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 7

Results.

See 0008

CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 8

Results.

See 0009

CERCLIS Characterization Project: Region 9

Results.

See 0010

CERCLIS Characterization Project Region
10 Results.

Sea 0011

CERCUS (Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability infor-
mation System) Site Location Extract,
See 0012
CERCLIS Listing.

See 0014

CERCUS - WasteLAN - CleanLAN.

See 0015

Characterization Protocol for Radioactive
Contaminated Soils.

See 1494

Characterizing soils for hazardous waste site

assessments.

See 1495

Chemfix Technologies, Inc. Solidification/
Stabilization Process. Application Analysis
Report.

See 1551

Chemical Dehalogenation Treatability Stud-
ies under CERCLA: An Overview.

See 1153

Chemical Dehalogenation Treatability Stud-
ies under CERCLA: An Overview.

See 1209

Chemical Oxidation Treatment. Engineering

Bulletin.

See 1211

Citizen's Guide to Air Sparging.

See 0452

Citizen's Guide to Bioventing.

See 0453

Citizen's Guide to Glycolate Dehalogenation.
See 0454

Citizen's Guide to How Innovative Treatment
Technologies Are Being Successfully Ap-
plied at Superfund Sites.

See 0455

Citizen's Guide to In situ Soil Flushing.
See 0456

Citizen's Guide to innovative Treatment
Technologies for Contaminated Soils,
Sludges, Sediments and Debris.

See 0457

Citizen's Guide to Soil Washing.

See 0458

Citizen's Guide to Solvent Extraction.
See 0459

Citizen's Guide to Thermal Desorption.
See 0460

Citizen's Guide to Using indigenous and Ex-
ogenous Microorganisms in Bioremediation.
See 0461

Citizens' Guidance Manual for the Technical
Assistance Grant Program.

See 0462

Citizens' Guidance Manual for the Technical
Assistance Grant Program.

See 0463

Clarification of Delegation to Approve Con-
sistency Exemptions at NPL Sites.

See 0336

Cleaning Up the Nation's Waste Sites: Mar-
kets and Technology Trends,

See 0132

Cleanup Information Bulletin Board System
Users Guide. (CLU-IN: Cleanup Information
Bulletin Board).

See 1215

Closing the NPL Booh under the Original

HRS.

See 0337

Communicating with the Public About Haz-
ardous Materials: An Examination of Local
Practice. Risk Communication Series.
See 0464

Community Relations during Enforcement
Activities and Development of the Adminis-
trative Record.

See 0465

Community Relations during Enforcement
Activities and Development of the Adminis-
trative Record.

See 0466

Community Relations in Superfund: A Hand-
book.

See 0467

Community Relations: Use of Senior Envi-
ronmental Employees in Superfund (Super-
fund Management Review: Recommendation
43.K.L).

See 0088

Comparative Analysis of Remedies Selected
in the Superfund Program during FY 87, FY
88 and FY 89.

See 0519

Compendium of ERT Air Sampling Proce-
dures.

See 0901

Compendium of ERT Field Analytical Proce-
dures.

See 0902

Compendium of ERT Groundwater Sampling

Procedures.

See 0903

Compendium of ERT Soil Sampling and Sur-
face Geophysics Procedures.

See 0904

Compendium of ERT Surface Water and
Sediment Sampling Procedures.

See 0905

Compendium of ERT Toxicity Testing Proce-
dures.

See 0906

Compendium of ERT Waste Sampling Pro-
cedures.

See 0907

Compendium of NPL listing Policies and
Procedures, 1902 to 1985.

Sea 0338

Compendium of ROD Language for FY 1993
Focus Areas.

See 1083

Compliance with Third Third Requirements
Under the LDRs. Superfund LDR Guide No.
8.

See 0418

Computer Models Used to Support Cleanup
Decision-Making at Hazardous and Radioac-
tive Waste Sites.

See 1218

Conducting Non-Time-Critical Removal Ac-
tions under CERCLA.

See 0999

Conducting Remedial Investigations/Feasi-
bility Studies for CERCLA Municipal Landfill
Sites.

See 1084

Congressional Limits for FY 02 Alternative
Remedial Contracting Strategy (ARCS) Pro-
gram Management Costs.

See 0022

Consent Orders and the Reimbursement
Provision Under Section 106(b) of CERCLA.
See 0620

Consideration of ARARs during Removal Ac-
tions.

See 0419

Consideration of RCRA Requirements in
Performing CERCLA Responses at Mining
Waste Sites.

See 0420

Considerations in Ground Water Remedi-
ation at Superfund Sites.

See 1436

Consultation on Records of Decision
(RODS) for Containment-Only Remedies.
See 0521

Contingency Analysis Modeling for Super-
fund Sites and Other Sources.

See 1219

Continuous Release-Emergency Response
Notification System and Priority Assessment
Model: Model Documentation.

See 1143

Continuous Release-Emergency Response
Notification System and Priority Assessment
Model: User's Manual for EPA Regions.
See 1144

Continuous Release - Emergency Response
Notification System. User's Manual for In-
dustry.

See 1145

Contracting and Subcontracting Guide to the
Superfund Program.

See 0023

Control of Air Emissions from Materials Han-
dling during Remediation. Engineering Bulle-
tin.

See 1398

Control of Air Emissions from Superfund Air
Strippers at Superfund Groundwater Sites,
See 1399

Control of Air Emissions from Superfund

Sites.

See 1400

Coordination of EPA and State Actions in
Cost Recovery.

See 0522

Cost of Remedial Action Model.

See 1085

Cost of Remedial Actions (CORA) Model:
Overview and Applications.

See 1086

Cost Recovery Actions/Statute of Limita-
tions.

See 0523

Cost Recovery Actions under CERCLA.
See 0524

SU-26

-------
SUBJECT INDEX

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

Cost Recovery Referrals,

See 0525

Counting State-Lead Enforcement NPL Sites
Toward the CERCLA Section 116(e) Reme-
dial Action Start Mandate.

See 0468

Covenants Not to Sue under SARA.

See 0526

Criminal Investigations and the Superfund

Program,

See 0489

CWM PO*WW*ER (Trade Name) Evapora-
tion-Catalytic Oxidation Technology: Applica-
tions Analysis Report.

See 1225

Data Quality Objectives Process for Super-

fund.

See 0981

Debarment and Suspension.

See 0470

Demonstration of a Trial Excavation at the
McCotl Superfund Site.

See 1226

Demonstration of Waste Treatment Technol-
ogies.

See 1229

Determination of Imminent and Substantial
Endangerrrent for Removal Actions.
See 1000

Determining Soil Response Action Levels
Based on Potential Contaminant Migration to
Ground Water: A Compendium of Examples.
See 1497

Development of Emerging Technologies
within the SITE Program.

See 1231

Discussions with the Public Concerning NPL

Listings.

See 0339

Distribution of DRAFT Soil Screening Level

Guidance.

See 1600

DuPont/Oberlin Mierofiltration Technology.
Applications Analysis Report.

See 1584

ECO Update: Ecological Assessment of Su-
perfund Sites. An Overview. Volume 1,
Number 2, December 1991.

See 1019

ECO Update: The Role of BTAGs in Ecologi-
cal Assessment, Volume 1, Number 1, Sep-
tember 1991,

See 1020

ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 3. The
Role of Natural Resource Trustees In the
Superfund Process.

See 1021

ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 4. Develop-
ing a Work Scope for Ecological Assess-
ments.

See 1022

ECO Update. Volume 1, Number 5, August
1932. Briefing the BTAG: Initial Description
of Setting, History, and Ecology of a Site.
See 1023

Ecological Risk Assessment Methods: A
Review and Evaluation of Past Practices In
the Superfund and RCRA (Resource Conser-
vation and Recovery Act) Programs (Execu-
tive Summary Included).

See 1024

Ecological Risk Management in the Super-
fund and RCRA (Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act) Programs.

See 1025

Ecosystem Effects of Superfund. National
Priority List Sites In Industrial Landscapes: A
Framework for Policy Decisions.

See 0135

Effect of OSHA's Bloodbome Pathogens
Standard on Hazardous Waste Cleanup Ac-
tivities.

See 1026

Emergency Responders Agreements for
Fund-Lead Remedial Actions.

Sea 1001

Emergency Response Cleanup Services
Contracts (ERCS). Users Manual.

See 0024

Emergency Response Notification System,
See 0927

Endangerment Assessment Guidance.
See 0527

Endangerment Assessment Guidance.
See 0528

Endangerment Assessment Handbook.
See 0529

Endangerment Assessment Handbook.
See 0530

Enforcement Project Management Hand-
book.

See 0531

Enforcement Project Management Hand-
book.

See 0532

Enforcement Project Management Hand-
book.

See 0533

Enforcement under SACM: Interim Guid-
ance. Volume 1, Number 3, December 1992.
See 0090

Engineering Bulletin: Pyrolysis Treatment.
See 1234

Engineering Bulletin: Slurry Walls.

See 1235

Engineering Bulletin: Technology Preselec-
tion Data Requirements.

See 1405

Enhancing State Superfund Capabilities:
Nine-State Study.

See 0471

Ensuring the Adequacy of Cost Share Provi-
sions in Superfund State Contracts.

See 0472

Entry and Continued Access under CERCLA.
See 0534

Environmental Asbestos Assessment
Manual. Superfund Method for (he Determi-
nation of Asbestos in Ambient Air. Part 1.
Method.

See 1027

Environmental Asbestos Assessment
Manual. Superfund Method for the Determi-
nation of Asbestos in Ambient Air. Part 2.
Technical Background Document.

See 1028

Environmental Compliance Branch, Standard
Operating Procedures and Quality Assurance
Manual, Revision 1.

See 0535

EPA Interim Guidance on Indemnification of
Superfund Response Action Contractors
Under Section 119 of SARA.

See 0536

EPA/Navy CERCLA Remedial Action Tech-
nology Guide.

See 1241

EPA Oversight of Remedial Designs and Re-
medial Actions Performed by PRPs.
See 1124

EPA/U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Payment
Process, Direct Cite/Revised Reimburse-
ment Methods.

See 1125

EPA/USACE Payment Process: Direct Cite/
Revised Reimbursement Methods.

See 1126

Establishing Work Zones at Uncontrolled
Hazardous Waste Sites.

See 0908

Estimating Potential for Occurrence of
DNAPL at Superfund Sites.

See 1442

Estimating VOC Emissions from Superfund
Sites In the Houston-Qalveston Texas Area.
(NNEMS Project No. 1302).

See 1406

Evaluation and Testing of a Protocol to De-
termine the Aerobic Degradation Potential of
Hazardous Waste Constituents in Soil.
See 1503

Evaluation of Cleanup Levels tor Remedial
Action at CERCLA (Comprehensive Environ-
mental Response, Compensation and Liabil-
ity Act) Sites Based on a Review of EPA
(Environmental Protection Agency) Records
of Decision.

See 1245

Evaluation of Commercially-Available Porta-
ble Gas Chromatographs,

See 1478

Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
edies: Phase 2. Volume 1. Summary Report.
See 1444

Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
edies: Phase 2. Volume 2. Case Studies and
Updates.

See 1445

Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
edies. Volume 2. Case Studies 1-19.
See 1446

Evaluation of Ground-Water Extraction Rem-
edies. Volume 3. General Site Data: Data
Base Reports.

See 1447

Evaluation of Soil Venting Application,
Ground Water Issue.

See 1505

Evaluation of Terrestrial Indicators for Use In
Ecological Assessments at Hazardous
Waste Sites.

See 1249

Evaluation of the Likelihood of DNAPL Pres-
ence at NPL Sites: National Results.
See 1448

Evaluation of Unsaturated/Valdose Zona
Models for Superfund Sites.

See 1449

Exercising Flexibility through the Superfund
Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM).
See 0091

Expanded Civil Judicial Referral Procedures.
See 0539

Expansion of Direct Referral of Cases to the
Department of Justice.

See 0540

Expedited Response Actions.

See 1003

Expediting Remedial Construction.

See 1127

Extending the Tracking of Analytical Serv-
ices to Potentially Responsible Party-Lead
Superfund Sites (Supplemental Guidance on
OSWER Directive 9240.0-2A).

See 0986

Facilitated Transport. Series of Issue Papers

(3rd).

See 1451

Feasibility Study: Detailed Analysis of Reme-
dial Action Alternatives.

See 1088

Feasibility Study: Development and Screen-
ing of Remedial Action Alternatives.
See 1089

Field Applications of Robotic Systems in
Hazardous environments, pi-28 1993. See
also PB86-176344 and PB92-166743.
See 1251

SU-27

-------
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

SUBJECT INDEX

Field Standard Operating Procedures for Air
Surveillance F.S.O.P. No. 8,

See 0910

Field Standard Operating Procedures for Es-
tablishing Work Zones (F.S.O.P, 6).

See 0911

Field Standard Operating Procedures for
Preparation of a Site Safety Plan F.S.O.P.
No. 9.

See 0912

Field Standard Operating Procedures for the
Decontamination of Response Personnel
F.S.O.P. No. 7.

See 0913

Final EPA Policy on the Inclusion of Environ-
mental Auditing Provisions in Enforcement
Settlements.

See 0541

Final Guidance on Administrative Records
for Selecting CERCLA Response Actions.
See 0473

Final Guidance on Implementation of the
'Consistency' Exemption to the Statutory
Limits on Removal Actions.

See 1004

Final Guidance on Preparing Waste-In Lists
and Volumetric Rankings for Release to Po-
tentially Responsible Parlies (PRPs) under
CERCLA ("Waste-In' Guidance).

See 0542

Final Policy on Setting RI/FS Priorities.
See 1090

Forum Focus, August 1993.

See 0136

Forum on Innovative Hazardous Waste
Treatment Technologies: Domestic and
International. Held in Atlanta, Georgia on
June 19-21,1989. Technical Papers.
See 1253

Forum on Innovative Hazardous Waste
Treatment Technologies (3rd): Domestic and
International. Held in Dallas, Texas on June
11-13,1991. Technical Papers.

See 1254

Funding of State Enforcement Related Ac-
tivities.

See 0474

Further Direction on Implementing the Su-
perfund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM),
See 0093

Furthering the Use of Innovative Treatment
Technologies in OSWER Programs.

See 1255

Furthering the Use of Innovative Treatment
Technologies in OSWER Programs.

See 1256

FY 1992 Themes for Regional Coordination
to Support Continuous Improvements of Su-
perfund's Remedial Program.

See 1091

Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS.

See 1092

Granular Activated Carbon Treatment. Engi-
neering Bulletin.

See 1258

Ground-Water Issue: Characterizing Soils for
Hazardous Waste Site Assessments.
See 1455

Ground Water Sampling for Metals Analyses.
Superfund Ground Water Issue.

See 1459

Guidance Documents Relating to Landfills
and Contaminants.

See 1259

Guidance for Capacity Assurance Planning.
Capacity Planning Pursuant to CERCLA Sec-
tion 104(c)(9).

See 0137

Guidance for Coordinating ATSDR Health
Assessment Activities with the Superfund
Remedial Process.

See 1029

Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
ment
See 1030

Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
ment.

See 1031

Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
ment. Interim Report.

See 1032

Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assess-
ment (Part A).

See 1033

Guidance for Environmental Priorities Initia-
tive (EPI) Facilities in the Superfund Pre-Re-
medlal Program.

See 0341

Guidance for Organizing ARCS Contract

Files.

See 0025

Guidance for Performing Preliminary Assess-
ments under CERCLA.

See 0342

Guidance for Performing Site Inspections
under CERCLA.

See 0343

Guidance of the Use of Stipulated Penalties
in Hazardous Waste Consent Decrees.
See 0544

Guidance on Applicability of EPA Order
3500.1 to CERCLA Staff.

See 0545

Guidance on Applying the Data Quality Ob-
jectives Process for Ambient Air Monitoring
Around Superfund Sites (Stage 3).

See 0987

Guidance on Applying the Data Quality Ob-
jectives Process for Ambient Air Monitoring
Around Superfund Sites (Stages 1 and 2).
See 0988

Guidance on CERCLA Section 106 Judicial

Actions.

See 0546

Guidance on CERCLA Settlements with De
Micromis Waste Contributors.

See 0547

Guidance on CERCLA 106(a) Unilateral Ad-
ministrative Orders for Remedial Designs
and Remedial Actions.

See 0548

Guidance on Documenting Decisions Not to
Take Cost Recovery Actions.

See 0549

Guidance on Drafting Consent Decrees in
Hazardous Waste Cases.

See 0550

Guidance on EPA Oversight of Remedial De-
signs and Remedial Actions Performed by
Potentially Responsible Parties.

See 1128

Guidance on Expediting Remedial Design
and Remedial Action.

See 1129

Guidance on Federal Superfund Liens.
See 0551

Guidance on Implementation of the 'Contrib-
ute to Remedial Performance" Provision.
See 1093

Guidance on Implementation of the Super-
fund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM)
under CERCLA and the NCP.

See 0094

Guidance on Landowner Liability under Sec-
tion 107(a)(1) of CERCLA, De Minimis Set-
tlements under Section 122(g)(1)(B) of
CERCLA, and Settlements with Prospective
Purchasers of Contaminated Property.
See 0552

Guidance on Oversight of Potentially Re-
sponsible Party Remedial Investigations and
Feasibility Studies. Volume 1,

See 1094

Guidance ori Oversight of Potentially Re-
sponsible Party Remedial Investigations and
Feasibility Studies. Volume 2. Appendices.
See 1095

Guidance on Premium Payments in CERCLA

Settiemerits.

See 0553

Guidance on Preparing Waste-in Lists and
Volumetric Rankings for Release to Poten-
tially Responsible Partes (PRPs) under
CERCLA.

See 0554

Guidance on Procedures for Submitting
CERCLA Section 106(b) Reimbursement Pe-
titions and on EPA Review of Those Peti-
tions.

See 0555

Guidance on Program Management Activi-
ties under ARCS.

See 0026

Guidance on Remedial Actions for Super-
fund Sites with PCS Contamination.
See 1260

Guidance on Remedial Actions for Super-
fund Sites with PCB Contamination.

See 1261

Guidance Regarding CERCLA Enforcement
against Bankrupt Partes.

See 0556

Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA.

See 1154

Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA.

See 1155

Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Aerobic Biodegradation
Remedy Screening.

See 1156

Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Aerobic Biodegradation
Remedy Screening. Interim Guidance.
See 1157

Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA Aerobic Biodegradation
Remedy Screening. Quick Reference Fact
Sheet
See 1158

Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Biodegradation Remedy Se-
lection. Interim Guidance.

See 1159

Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Biodegradation Remedy Se-
lection. Quick Reference Fact Sheet
See 1160

Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Chemical Dehalogenation.
See 1161

Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Chemical Dehalogenation.
Final Report.

See 1162

Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA; Soil Vapor Esctraction. Inter-
im Guidance.

See 1163

Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Soil Vapor Extraction. Quick
Reference Fact Sheet.

See 1164

Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA Solvent Extraction. Interim
Guidance.

See 1167

Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERCLA: Solvent Extraction Quick
Reference Fact Sheet.

See 1168

SU-28

-------
SUBJECT INDEX

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

Guide for Conducting Treatability Studies
under CERGLA; Thermal Desorption Quick
Reference Fact Sheet.

See 1t69

Guide: Methods tor Evaluating the Attain-
ment of Cleanup Standards for Soils and
Solid Media,

See 1508

Guide on Remedial Actions at Superfund
Sites with PCB Contamination.

See 1262

Guide to Addressing Pre-ROD and Post-
ROD Changes.

See 1096

Guide to Community Involvement tor Site
Assessment Managers.

See 0476

Guide to Delisting of RCRA Wastes for Su-
perfund Remediei Responses.

See 0422

Guide to Developing Action Memorandums.
See 1097

Guide to Developing Superfund No Action,
Interim Action, and Contingency Remedy
RODS.

See 1098

Guide to Developing Superfund Proposed

Plans.

See 1099

Guide to Discharging CERCLA Aqueous
Wastes to Publicly Owned Treatment Works
(POTWs).

See 0423

Guide to Obtaining No Migration Variances
for CERCLA Remedial Actions.

See 0424

Guide to Pump and Treat Groundwater Re-
mediation Technology.

See 1462

Guide to Removal Enforcement.

See 1006

Guide to Selecting Superfund Remedial Ac-
tions.

See 11(H)

Harmonization of OA Procedures for Envi-
ronmental Data Operations; Development of
a National Consensus Standard tor Quality
Assurance for Environmental Programs.
See 0989

Hazard Ranking System Guidance Manual.
See 0346

Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergen-
cy Response; Uncontrolled Hazardous
Waste Sites and RCRA Corrective Actions.
See 0425

Hazardous Waste Operations and Emergen-
cy Response: RCRA TSD and Emergency
Response Without Regard to Location.
See 0914

Hazardous Waste Superfund Collection: Da-
tabase Thesaurus.

See 0138

Hazmat Team Planning Guidance.

See 0915

Headquarters Support Contract Management

Procedures.

See 0029

Health and Safety Roles and Responsibilities
at Remedial Sites.

See 0918

Health Effects Assessment for Benzene.
See 103S

Health Effects Assessment for Cadmium,
See 1036

Health Effects Assessment for Carbon Tet-
rachloride.

See 1037

Health Effects Assessment for Ghlordane.
See 1038

Health Effects Assessment for Chloroben-

zene.

See 1039

Health Effects Assessment for Chloroform.
See 1040

Health Effects Assessment for DDT.
See 1041

Health Effects Assessment for Methyl Ethyl

Ketone,

See 1042

Health Effects Assessment for Methylene

Chloride.

See 1043

Health Effects Assessment for Naphthalene.
See 1044

Health Effects Assessment for Phenol.
See 104S

Health Effects Assessment for Styrene.
See 1046

Health Effects Assessment for Tetrachlor-

oethylene.

See 1047

Health Effects Assessment for Trichloroethy-
lene.

See 1048

Health Effects Assessment for Xylenes.
See 1049

Health Effects Assessment for 2,4,5-Trichlor-
ophenoxy Acetic Add (2,4,5-T).

See 1050
Health Effects
Tables.

See 1051
Health Effects
Tables.

See 1052
Health Effects
Tables.

See 1053

Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables
Fourth Quarter FY 1989.

See 1054

Highlights; Superfund Program Management
Fiscal Yaar 1993.

See 0095

Homeowners Exempted from Superfund
Cleanup Costs; National Policy Overview.
See 0428

Horsehead Resource Development Compa-
ny, Inc., Flame Reactor Technology. Tech-
nology Demonstration Summary.

See 1264

HSED SACM Report. Volume 1, Number 1,
January 1993.

See 0096

Hydrogeology and Results of Aquifer Tests
in the Vicinity of a Hazardous-Waste Dispos-
al Site Near Byron, Illinois.

See 1463

Identification and Compilation of Unsaturat-
ed/Vadose Zone Models.

See 1464

Identification of a Senior Superfund Official
for Addressing Special NPL Site-Related
Issues.

See 0348

Immobilization Technology Seminar: Speaker
Slide Copies and Supporting Information.
See 1555

Implementation of the Alternative Remedial
Contracting Strategy (ARCS) Task Fores
Recommendations: Transmittal ol the Imple-
mentation Plan.

See 0030

Implementation ot the Decentralized Con-
tractor Performance Evaluation and Award
Fee Process lor Selected Remedial Program
Contracts.

See 0031

Implementation ol the Superfund Alternative
Remedial Contracting Strategy (ARCS):
Report of the Administrator's Task Force.
Implementation Plan.

See 0032

Implementing the Deputy Administrator's
Risk Characterization Memorandum.
See 1056

In situ Soil Flushing. Engineering Bulletin,
See 1510

In situ Soil Vapor Extraction Treatment
See 1511

In-situ Stabilization/Solidification of PCB
{Polychlorinated Blphenyls)-Contaminated
Soil.

See 1556

In situ Steam Extraction Treatment.

See 1512

In situ Treatment of Contaminated Ground
Water. An Inventory of Research and Field
Demonstrations and Strategies for Improving
Ground Water Remediation Technologies.
See 1466

Initiation of PRP-Rnanced Remedial Design
in Advance of Consent Decree Entry (Final).
See 0557

Initiatives to Streamline the Alternative Re-
medial Contacting Strategy (ARCS) Con-
tracts' Award Fee Process.

See 0033

Innovative Methods to Increase Public In-
volvement in Superfund Community Rela-
tions (Superfund Management Review Rec-
ommendation No. 43.A).

See 0097

Innovative Operational Treatment Technol-
ogies tor Application to Superfund Site: Nine
Case Studies.

See 1269

Innovative Technology: BEST Solvent Ex-
traction Process.

See 1270

Innovative Technology: Glycolate Dehaio-

genation.

See 1513

Innovative Technology: In-situ Vitrification.
See 1514

Innovative Technology: Slurry-Phase Biode-

gradation.

See 1271

Innovative Technology. Soil Washing.
See 1515

Innovative Treatment Technologies: Over-
view and Guide to Information Sources.
See 1272

Innovative Treatment Technologies: Semi-
Annual Status Report (Fourth Edition).
See 1273

Innovative Treatment Technologies: Semi-
Annual Status Report, January 1991. First
Issue.

See 1274

Inside the Hotline: A Compilation of 1992
Monthly Hotline Reports.

See 0141

Installation Restoration Program. Technical
Support Document for Record of Decision,
Cape Newenham, AFS.

See 1276

Integrated Timeline for Superfund Site Man-
agement (SMR 5,15).

See 0098

Interim Cashout Settlement Procedures.
See 0558

Interim CERCLA Settlement Policy.

See 0559

Interim Final Guidance Package on Funding
CERCLA State Enforcement Actions at NPL
Sites.

See 0477

Interim Guidance for Soil Ingestion Rates.
Sea 1057

Assessment Summary
Assessment Summary
Assessment Summary

SU-29

-------
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

SUBJECT INDEX

Interim Guidance on Establishing Soil Lead
Cleanup Levels at Superfund Sites, Supple-
ment to Interim Guidance on Establishing
Soil Lead Cleanup Levels at Superfund
Sites.

See 1516

Interim Guidance on Notice Letters, Negotia-
tions, and Information Exchange.

See 0560

Interim Guidance on Potentially Responsible
Party Participation in Remedial Investigations
and Feasibility Studies.

See 0561

Interim Guidance on Settlements with De
Minimis Waste Contributors under Section
122(g) of SARA.

See 0562

Interim Guidance: Streamlining the CERCLA
Settlement Decision Process.

See 0563

Interim Guidelines for Preparing Nonbindlng
Preliminary Allocations of Responsibility.
See 0564

Interim Model CERCLA Section 122(g) (4)
De Minimis Waste Contributor Consent
Decree and Administrative Order on Con-
sent.

See 0565

Interim RCRA/CERCLA Guidance on Non-
Contiguous Sites and On-Site Management
on Waste and Treatment Residue,

See 0427

International Conference on New Frontiers
for Hazardous Waste Management (Third)
Proceedings. Held in Pittsburgh, Pennsylva-
nia on September 10-13,1989.

See 1278

International Waste Technologias/Geo-Con
In situ Stabilization/Solidification: Applica-
tions Analysis Report.

See 1557

Inventory of Treatability Study Vendors.
Volume 1,

See 1171

Issuance of Administrative Orders for Imme-
diate Removal Actions.

See 0567

Issuance of Administrative Orders Under
Section 3019 ol the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act
See 0568

Issuance of Final Revised Guidance on the
Use and Issuance of Administrative Orders
Under Section 7003 of the Resource Con-
servation and Recovery Act (RCRA),
See 0569

Land Disposal Restrictions as Relevant and
Appropriate Requirements for CERCLA Con-
taminated Soil and Debris.

See 0428

Liability of Corporate Shareholders and Suc-
cessor Corporations for Abandoned Sites
Under the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability Act.
See 0570

Limited-Use Chemical Protective Clothing lor
EPA Superfund Activities.

See 1058

Limiting Lead Transfers to Private Parties
during Discrete Phases of the Remedial
Process.

See 0571

Literature Survey of Innovative Technologies
for Hazardous Waste Site Remediation,
1987-1991.

See 1281

Long-Term Contracting Strategy for Super-
fund.

See 0042

Long-Term Contracting Strategy for Super-
fund - Implementation.

See 0043

Making Superfund Documents Available to
the Public throughout the Cleanup Process,
and Discussing Site Findings and Decisions
as They are Developed (Superfund Manage-
ment Review: No. 43 G, H, Q, R, T).
See 0100

Management Review of the Superfund Pro-
gram.

See 0101

Management Review of the Superfund Pro-
gram: Implementation Plan.

See 0102

Methodology for Early De Minimis Waste
Contributor Settlements under CERCLA Sec-
tion 122(g) (1) (A),

See 0573

Methodology for Evaluating Potential Car-
cinogenicity in Support of Reportable Quanti-
ty Adjustments Pursuant to CERCLA Section
102.

See 1146

Methods for Evaluating the Attainment of
Cleanup Standards. Volume 2. Ground
Water.

See 1469

Military Base Closures: Guidance on EPA
Concurrence In the Identification of Unccnta-
minated Parcels under CERCLA Section
120(h)(4),

See 0899

Minimizing Problems Caused by Staff Turn-
over (Superfund Management Review: Rec-
ommendation No. 43, M, N, O).

See 0105

Mobile Incineration: An Analysis of the In-
dustry.

See 1480

Mobile/Transportable Incineration Treat-
ment.

See 1481

Model Administrative Order on Consent for
Removal Actions.

See 0574

Model Litigation Report for CERCLA Sec-
tions 106 and 107 and RCRA Section 7003.
See 0576

Model Notice Letters.

See 0577

Model Statement of Work for a Remedial
Investigation and Feasibility Study Conduct-
ed by Potentially Responsible Parties.
See 0576

Model Unilateral Administrative Order for Re-
moval Response Activities.

See 0579

Model Unilateral Order for Remedial Design
and Remedial Action.

See 0580

Multi-Media Settlements of Enforcement

Claims,

See 0S81

Multi-Media Settlements of Enforcement

Claims.

See 0582

NACEPT Committee Recommendations to
Administrator Browner.

See 0142

NACEPT Materials for Meeting Held on Sep-
tember 20-21, 1993.

See 0143

National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pol-
lution Contingency Plan (as Published in the
Federal Register, March 8,1990).

See 0145

National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pol-
lution Contingency Plan (The NCR).

See 0146

National Priorities List Book Set.

See 0147

National Priorities List Sites: Alabama.
See 0148

National Priorities List Sites: Alabama.
See 0149

National Priorities List Sites: Alabama, 1992.
See 0150

National Priorities List Sites: Alaska.
See 0151

National Priorities List Sites: Alaska.
See 0152

National Priorities List Sites: Alaska, 1992.
See 0153

National Priorities List Sites: American
Samoa, Guam, and the Trust Territories.
See 0154

National Priorities List Sites: American
Samoa, Guam and Trust Territories.
See 0155

National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and

Nevada,

See 0156

National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and

Nevada,

See 0157

National Priorities List Sites: Arizona and
Nevada, 1892.

See 0158

National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas.
See 01S9

National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas.
See 0160

National Priorities List Sites: Arkansas, 1992.
See 0161

National Priorities List Sites: California.
See 0162

National Priorities List Sites: California and

Hawaii.

See 0163

National Priorities List Sites: California and
Hawaii, 1992.

See 0164

National Priorities List Sites: Colorado.
See 0165

National Priorities List Sites: Colorado.
See 0166

National Priorities List Sites: Colorado, 1992.
See 0167

National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut.
See 0168

National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut.
See 0169

National Priorities List Sites: Connecticut,

1982.

See 0170

National Priorities List Sites: Delaware.
See 0171

National Priorities List Sites: Delaware.
See 0172

National Priorities Ust Sites: Delaware, 1992.
See 0173

National Priorities List Sites: Florida,
See 0174

National Priorities List Sites: Florida.
See 0175

National Priorities List Sites: Florida, 1992.
See 0176

National Priorities List Sites: Georgia.
See 0177

National Priorities List Sites: Georgia.
See 0178

National Priorities List Sites: Georgia, 1992.
See 0179

National Priorities List Sites: Hawaii.
See 0180

National Priorities List Sites: Idaho.

See 0181

National Priorities List Sites: Idaho.

See 0182

National Priorities List Sites: Idaho, 1992.
See 0183

SU-30

-------
SUBJECT INDEX

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

National Priorities List Sites: Illinois.

See 0184

National Priorities List Sites: Illinois.

See 0185

National Priorities List Sites: Illinois, 1992.
See 0188

National Priorities List Sites: Indiana.
See 0187

National Priorities List Sites: Indiana.
See 0188

National Priorities List Sites: Indiana, 1992.
See 0189

National Priorities List Sites: Iowa.

See 01S0

National Priorities List Sites: Iowa.

See 0191

National Priorities List Sites: Iowa, 1992.
Sae 0192

National Priorities List Sites: Kansas.
See 0193

National Priorities List Sites: Kansas.
See 0194

National Priorities List Sites: Kansas, 1992.
See 0195

National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky.
See 0196

National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky,
See 0197

National Priorities List Sites: Kentucky, 1992.
See 0198

National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana.
See 0199

National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana.
See 0200

National Priorities List Sites: Louisiana, 1992.

§00 0201

National Priorities List Sites: Maine.

See 0202

National Priorities List Sites: Maine.

See 0203

National Priorities List Sites: Maine, 1992.
See 0204

National Priorities List Sites: Maryland.
See 0205

National Priorities List Sites: Maryland.
See 0206

National Priorities List Sites: Maryland, 1992.
See 0207

National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts.
See 0208

National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts.
See 0209

National Priorities List Sites: Massachusetts,

1992.

See 0210

National Priorities List Sites: Michigan.
See 0211

National Priorities List Sites: Michigan,
See 0212

National Priorities List Sites: Michigan, 1992.
See 0213

National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota.
See 0214

National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota.
See 0215

National Priorities List Sites: Minnesota,

1992.

See 0216

National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi,
Sea 0217

National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi.
See 0218

National Priorities List Sites: Mississippi,

1992.

See 0219

National Priorities List Sites: Missouri.
See 0220

National Priorities List Sites: Missouri.
See 0221

National Priorities List Sites: Missouri, 1992.
See 0222

List

Sites;

New

Hamp-

National Priorities List

Sites:

Rhode

Island.

See 0262

National Priorities List

Sites:

Rhode

Island.

List

Sites:

New

Hamp-

See 0263

National Priorities List

Sites:

Rhode

Island,

National Priorities List Sites; Montana.
See 0223

National Priorities List Sites: Montana.
See 0224

National Priorities List Sites: Montana, 1992.
See 0226

National Priorities List Sites; Nebraska,

§00 0226

National Priorities List Sites: Nebraska,
See 0227

National Priorities List Sites: Nebraska,
1992.

See 0228
National Prior
shire.

See 0229
National Prior
shire.

See 0230

National Priorities List Sites: New Hamp-
shire, 1992.

See 0231

National Priorities List Sites: New jersey.
See 0232

National Priorities list Sites: New Jersey.
See 0233

National Priorities List Sites: New Jersey,

1992.

See 0234

National Priorities List Sites: New Mexico.
See 0235

National Priorities List Sites: New Mexico.
See 0236

National Priorities List Sites; New Mexico,

1992.

See 0237

National Priorities List Sites: New York.
300 0238

National Priorities List Sites: New York.
See 0239

National Priorities List Sites: New York,

1992.

See 0240

National Priorities List Sites: North and
South Dakota.

See 0241

National Priorities List Sites: North and
South Dakota, 1992.

See 0242

National Priorities List Sites: North Carolina.
See 0243

National Priorities List Sites: North Carolina.
See 0244

National Priorities List Sites: North Carolina,

1992.

See 0245

National Priorities List Sites: North Dakota
and South Dakota.

See 0246

National Priorities list Sites: Ohio.

See 0247

National Priorities List Sites: Ohio.

See 0248

National Priorities List Sites: Ohio, 1992,
See 0249

National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma.
See 0250

National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma.
See 0251

National Priorities List Sites: Oklahoma,

1992.

See 0252

National Priorities List Sites: Oregon.
See 0253

National Priorities List Sites: Oregon.
See 0254

National Priorities List Sites; Oregon, 1992.
See 0255

National Priorities List Sites: Pennsylvania.
See 0256

National Priorities List Sites: Pennsylvania.
See 0257

National Priorities List Sites; Pennsylvania,

1992.

See 0258

National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico.
See 0259

National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico.
See 0260

National Priorities List Sites: Puerto Rico and
Virgin Islands, 1992.

See 0261

1992.

See 0264

National Priorities List Sites Set (1991).
See 0265

National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina.
See 0266

National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina.
See 0267

National Priorities List Sites: South Carolina,

1992.

See 0268

National Priorities list Sites: Tennessee.
See 0269

National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee.
See 0270

National Priorities List Sites: Tennessee,

1992.

See 0271

National Priorities List Sites: Texas.

See 0272

National Priorities List Sites: Texas.

See 0273

National Priorities List Sites: Texas, 1992.
See 0274

National Priorities List Sites: The United
States Territories, 1992.

See 0275

National Priorities List Sites: Utah.

See 0276

National Priorities List Sites: Utah,

See 0277

National Priorities List Sites; Utah, 1992.
See 0278

National Priorities List Sites: Vermont,
See 0279

National Priorities List Sites: Vermont.
See 0280

National Priorities List Sites: Vermont, 1992.
See 0281

National Priorities List Sites: Virginia
See 0282

National Priorities List Sites: Virginia.
See 0283

National Priorities List Sites; Virginia, 1992.
See 0284

National Priorities List Sites: Washington.
See 0285

National Priorities List Sites: Washington.
See 0286

National Priorities List Sites: Washington,

1992.

See 0287

National Prior lies

List

Sites:

West

Virginia.

See 0288

National Priorities

List

Sites:

West

Virginia.

See 0289

National Priorities

List

Sites:

West

Virginia,

1992.

See 0290

National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin.
See 0291

SU-31

-------
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

SUBJECT INDEX

National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin.
See 0292

National Priorities List Sites: Wisconsin,

1992.

S00 0293

National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming.
See 0294

National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming.
See 029S

National Priorities List Sites: Wyoming, 1992.
See 0296

National Superfund Program Priorities, Fiscal
Year 1984.

See 0298

Nature and Extent of Ecological Risks at Su-
perfund Sites and RCRA (Resource Conser-
vation and Recovery Act) Facilities (Execu-
tive Summary Included).

See 1060

New Policy on Performance of Risk Assess-
ments during Remedial Investigation Feasi-
bility Studies (RI/FS) Conducted by Poten-
tially Responsible Parties (PRPs).

See 1061

Notification of Hazardous Substance Sites
(Section 103(c)).

See 1147

Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 1.

See 1174

Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 2.

See 1175

Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 3.

See 1176

Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 4.

See 1177

Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 5.

See 1178

Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 6.

See 1179

Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 7.

See 1180

Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 8.

See 1181

Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 0.

See 1182

Notification of Hazardous Waste Sites Re-
quired Under Section 103(c) of the Compre-
hensive Environmental Response, Compen-
sation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980:
EPA Region 10.

See 1183

Notification Requirements for Continuous
Releases of Hazardous Substances.
See 1148

NPL Characterization Project: National Re-
sults.

See 035S

NPL Characterization Project: Region 1 Re-
sults.

See 03S6

NPL Characterization Project: Region 3 Re-
sults.

See 0357

NPL Characterization Project Region 4 Re-
sults.

See 0358

NPL Characterization Project: Region 5 Re-
sults.

See 0359

NPL Characterization Project: Region 6 Re-
sults.

See 0360

NPL Characterization Project: Rsgion 7 Re-
sults.

See 0361

NPL Characterization Project Region 8 Re-
sults.

See 0362

NPL Characterization Project: Region 9 Re-

suits.

See 0363

NPL Characterization Project: Region 10 Re-
sults.

See 0364

NPL Construction Completion Definition at
Bioremediation and Soil Vapor Extraction
Sites.

See 0365

Obtaining a Soil and Debris Treatability Vari-
ance for Removal Actions. Superfund LDR
Guide No. 6B.

See 0430

OERR Organizational Conflict of Interest
Review and Approval Program (Superfund
Management Review: Recommendation No.
48C).

See 0046

Off-Site Policy: RFA or Equivalent Investiga-
tion Requirement at RCRA Treatment and
Storage Facilities.

See 0431

Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
Incineration Research Facility: Annual
Report for FY89.

See 1482

Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
Incineration Research Facility: Annual
Report for FY90.

See 1483

Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
Incineration Research Facility: Annual
Report for FY91.

See 1484

Operations and Research at the U.S. EPA
Incineration Research Facility: Annual
Report for FY92.

See 1485

OSWER Integrated Health and Safety Stand-
ard Operating Practices.

See 0921

OSWER Source Book: Training and Tech-
nology Transfer Resources.

See 1283

OSWER Source Book. Volume 1. Training
and Technology Transfer Resources, 1892-
1993.

See 1284

OSWER Source Book. Volume 2. Training
and Technology Transfer Resources, 1992-
1983.

See 1285

Overview of ERNS: Emergency Response
Notification System (ERNS) Fact Sheet.
See 0935

Overview of Selected EPA (Environmental
Protection Agency) Regulations and Guid-
ance Affecting POTW (Publicly Owned
Treatment Works) Management.

See 0432

Overview of the Off-Site Policy for OSCs and

RPMs.

See 0433

Overview of the Outyear Liability Model

(OLM).

See 0106

PA Review Checklist.

See 0366

PA-Seore (Preliminary Assessment Score)
User's Manual and Tutorial. Version 2.1.
See 0367

PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score),
Version 1.0 (for Microcomputers),

See 0368

PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score),
Version 2,1, 3 1/2 inch (for Microcomput-
ers),

See 0380

PA-Score (Preliminary Assessment Score),
Version 2.1, 5 1/4 Inch (for Microcomput-
ers).

See 0370

PA-Score Software, Version 1.0. Users
Manual and Tutorial.

See 0371

Performance of Risk Assessments in Reme-
dial Investigation/Feasibility Studies (R!/
FSs) Conducted by Potentially Responsible
Partes (PRPs).

See 1102

Performance Tracking under ARCS Con-
tracts.

See 0061

Permits and Permit 'Equivalency' Processes
for CERCLA On-Slte Response Actions.
See 0435

Personal Air Sampling and Air Monitoring
Requirements under 29 CFR 1910,120.
See 0922

Physical/Chemical Treatment of Hazardous
Waste Sites: Speaker Slide Copies and Sup-
porting Information.

See 1287

Pilot-Scale Demonstration of a Slurry-Phase
Biological Reactor for Creosote-Contaminat-
ed Soli. Applications Analysis Report,
See 1426

Pilot-Scale incineration of Comtaminated
Soils from the Drake Chemical Superfund
Site.

See 1522

Pilot-Scale Incineration of Contaminated Soil
from the Purity Oil Sales and McColl Super-
fund Sites.

See 12S0

Pilot-Scale Incineration of PCB-Contaminat-
ed Sediments from the New Bedford Harbor
Hot Spot Superfund Site.

See 1292

Policy for Enforcement Actions against
Transporters under CERCLA,

See 0584

Policy for Superfund Compliance with the
RCRA Land Disposal Restrictions,

See 0436

SU-32

-------
SUBJECT INDEX

Policy on Floodplains and Wetland Assess-
ments for CERCLA Actions.

See 0437

Policy on Management of Post-Removal Site

Control.

See 1008

Policy on Recovering Indirect Cost In
CERCLA Section 107 Cost Recovery Ac-
tions.

See 0585

Policy Towards Owners of Residential Prop-
erty at Superfund Sites,

See 0586

Policy Towards Owners of Residential Prop-
erty at Superfund Sites.

See 0587

Political Subdivision Involvement in Super-

fund.

Sea 0479

Political Subdivision Involvement in Super-

fund.

See 0480

Potential for Joint Research between EPA
and the U.S. Army.

See 1293

Potential Sources of Error in Ground-Water
Sampling at Hazardous Waste Sites. Ground
Water Issue.

See 1472

Preliminary Ranking Evaluation Score
(PREscore) Version 1.1 (for Microcomput-
ers).

See 0372

Preparation of Hazardous Waste Referrals.
See 0588

PREscore Software. Users Manual and Tuto-
rial. Version 1.0.

See 0374

PREscore Software: Users Manual and Tuto-
rial Version 2.0.

See 0375

Presentations EPA-State Soil Standards
Conference. Held in Crystal City, Virginia on
January 29,1991.

See 1524

Priority for Health and Safety Requirements,
Especially Medical Surveillance Require-
ments, for EPA Employees Who Support
OSWER Programs.

See 0923

Procedural Guidance on Treatment of Insur-
ers under CERCLA.

See 0589

Procedures for Documenting Costs for
CERCLA Section 107 Actions.

See 0590

Procedures for Transmittal of CERCLA and
RCRA Civil Judicial Enforcement Case Pack-
ages to Headquarters,

See 0591

Procuring Innovative Technologies at Reme-
dial Sites: Q's and A's and Case Studies.
See 1132

Progress Toward Implementing Superfund.
Fiscal Year 1988.

See 0299

Progress Toward Implementing Superfund.
Fiscal Year 1989.

See 0300

Progress Toward Implementing Superfund,
Fiscal Year 1990: A Report to the Congress.
See 0301

Progress Toward Implementing Superfund,
Fiscal Year 1991. Report to Congress.
See 0302

Proposed Method to Evaluate the Effective-
ness of Community Involvement in Super-
fund (Superfund Management Review: Rec-
ommendation Number 43.A).

See 0109

Prospects for In situ Chemical Treatment for
Contaminated Soil.

See 1525

PRP Search Supplemental Guidance for
Sites in the Superfund Remedial Program.
See 0592

Public Awareness Signs at Superfund Sites.
See 0481

Quality and Environmental Protection: The
EPA QA Program.

See 0990

Quality Assurance for Superfund Environ-
mental Data Collection Activities.

See 0991

Quality Assurance/Quality Control Guidance
for Removal Activities: Sampling QA/QC
Plan and Data Validation Procedures.
See 0993

Quantifying Effects in Ecological Site As-
sessments: Biological and Statistical Consid-
erations.

See 1063

RCRA, Superfund Monthly Hot Line Reports.
See 0303

Real Estate Acquisition Procedures for
USAGE Projects.

See 1133

Reassignment of CLP Transportation Func-
tions.

See 0063

Recent Advances in Risk Reduction Engi-
neering.

See 1064

Regional Guide: Issuing Site-Specific Treat-
ability Variances for Contaminated Soils and
Debris Irom Land Disposal Restrictions
(LDRsJ.

See 1528

Regional Oversight of Federal Facility Clean-
ups under CERCLA.

See 0900

Regional Pilot Projects and Initiatives.
See 0064

Regional Pilots and Applications of Super-
fund Accelerated Cleanup Model (SACM),
See 0110

Regional Quality Control Guidance for NPL
Cancfidate Sites.

See 0376

Releasing Identities of Potentially Responsi-
ble Parties in Response to FOIA Requests.
See 0594

Releasing Information to Potentially Respon-
sible Parties at CERCLA Sites.

See 0595

Remedial Action Report Documentation for
Operable Unit Completion.

See 1134

Remedial Action, Treatment, and Disposal of
Hazardous Waste. Proceedings of the
Annual Hazardous Waste Research Sympo-
sium (17th), Held in Cincinnati, Ohio on April
0-11, 1991.

See 1135

Remedial Investigation: Site Characterization
and Treatability Studies.

See 1106

Removal Cost Management System: Version
3.2,

See 1009

Removal Program Representative Sampling
Guidance. Volume 1. Soil.

Sea 1010

Reporting and Exchange of Information on
State Enforcement Actions at National Prior-
ities List Sites,

See 0483

Reporting Requirements for Continuous Re-
leases of Hazardous Substances: A Guide
for Facilities and Vessels on Compliance.
See 1150

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

Alternating Current Electrocoagulation for
Superfund Site Remediation.

See 1192

Application of Tradescantia Micronucleus
Assay for In situ Evaluation of Potential Ge-
netic Hazards from Exposure to Chemicals
at a Wood-Preserving Site.

See 1195

Biodegradation of Creosote and Pentachlor-
ophenol in Contaminated Groundwater:
Chemical and Biological Assessment.
See 1432

Comparison of Organic Emissions from Haz-
ardous Waste Incinerators versus the 1990
Toxic Release Inventory Air Releases.
See 1397

Comparison: Organic Emissions from Haz-
ardous Waste Incinerators versus the 1980
Toxics Release Inventory Air Releases.
See 1217

Control Technologies for Remediation of
Contaminated Soil and Waste Deposits at
Superfund Lead Battery Recycling Sites.
See 1221

Control Technology: Estimating Innovative
Technology Costs for the SITE Program.
See 1222

Control Technology: 1992 Update of U.S.
EPA's Superfund Innovative Technology
Evaluation (SITE) Emerging Technology Pro-
gram.

See 1223

Cost Estimating Systems for Remedial
Action Projects.

See 1123

Demonstration of Hazardous Waste Site
Treatment Technologies.

See 1227

Demonstration Projects Under the U.S. EPA
Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation
Program.

See 1230

Description of EPA SITE Demonstration of
the HAZCON Stabilization Process at the
Douglassvilte, Pennsylvania Superfund Site.
See 1552

EPA SITE Demonstration of the International
Waste Technologies/Geo-Con In situ Stabili-
zation/Solidification Process.

See 1553

Factors Affecting the Applicability of Plasma
Systems to the Cleanup of Superfund Sites.
See 1250

Field Evaluation of the UV/Oxidation Tech-
nology to Treat Contaminated Groundwater.
Proceedings of the National Conference
(10th). Held in Washington, DC. on Novem-
ber 27-29, 1989.

Sea 1453

Filtration of Ground Water Samples for
Metals Analysis.

See 1454

Long-Path FTIR Measurements of Volatile
Organic Compounds in an Industrial Setting
(July 1989-April 1891).

See 1413

PAST: The Potential ARARs Selection Tool.
See 0434

Personnel Protection through Reconnais-
sance Robotics at Superfund Remedial
Sites.

See 1286

Potential Surrogate Metals for Incinerator
Trial Burns.

See 1466

Quality Assurance for the SITE (Superfund
Innovative Technology Evaluation) Program
Demonstrations.

See 0992

SU-33

-------
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

SUBJECT INDEX

Removal of Creosote from Soil by Thermal

Desorplion.

See 1530

Results tram the Stabilization Technologies
Evaluated by the Site Program. New Eng-
land Environmental Expo 90,

See 1558

SITE Demonstration of the CHEMFIX Solidi-
fication/Stabilization Process at the Portable
Equipment Salvage Company Site.

See 1559

Small Systems Meet Superfund Challenge
with Point-of-Entiy Treatment Units.

See 1304

Solidification/Stabilization: Is It Always Ap-
propriate.

See 1660

Use of Electrokinetics for Hazardous Waste
Site Remediation.

See 1366

Resources Conservation Company B.E.S.T.
(Trade Name) Solvent Extraction Technolo-
gy: Application Analysis Report.

See 1294

Resources for Preparing Independent Gov-
ernment Estimates for Remedial Contracting
Work Assignments.

See 0086

Response Action Contractor Final Indemnifi-
cation Guidelines. Volume 2, Number 1,
March 1993.

See 0067

Retech, Inc., Plasma Centrifugal Furnace;
Applications Analysis Report.

See 1295

Review and Evaluation of Area Source Dis-
persion Algorithms for Emission Sources at
Superfund Sites.

Sea 1416

Revised EPA Guidance on Parallel Proceed-
ings.

See 0597

Revised Hazard Ranking System: An Im-
proved Tool for Screening Superfund Sites.
See 0377

Revised Hazard Ranking System: Back-
ground Information.

See 0378

Revised Hazard Ranking System: Evaluating
Sites After Waste Removals.

See 0379

Revised Hazard Ranking System (HRS):
Final Rule.

See 0380

Revised Hazard Ranking System: Qs and
As.

See 0381

Revised Hazardous Waste Bankruptcy Guid-
ance.

See 0598

Revised Hazardous Waste Bankruptcy Guid-
ance, October 7,1991.

See 0599

Revised Procedures for implementing Off-
Site Response Actions.

See 0601

Revision of Policy Regarding Superfund
Project Assignment between Alternative Re-
medial Contracting Strategy Contractors and
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

See 0068

Revisions to OMS Circular A-94 on Guide-
lines and Discount Rates for Benefit-Cost
Analysis.

See 1107

Revisions to the Interim Guidance on PRP
Participation in Remedial Investigations and
Feasibility Studies.

See 0603

Ri/FS Improvements Follow-Up.

See 1109

RI/FS Streamlining.

See 1110

Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual.
Part A, April 1990.

See 1066

Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
(Part B),

See 1067

Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
(Part B, Development of Risk-Based Prelimi-
nary Remediation Goals).

See 1068

Risk Assessment Guidance lor Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
(Part C).

See 1069

Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual
(Part C, Risk Evaluation of Remedial Alterna-
tives).

Sae 1070

Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund.
Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual.
Supplemental Guidance: "Standard Default
Exposure Factors*.

See 1071

Risk Assessment in Superfund: A Primer.
First Edition, September 1990.

See 1073

Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory Site
Remediation Technical Support Program:
FY92 Annual Report.

See 1296

ROD Annual Report, FY 1989.

See 1111

ROD Annual Report, FY 1990.

ggg 1112

ROD Annual Report, FY1S91. Volume 1.
See 1113

ROD Annual Report, FY1991. Volume 2.
See 1114

ROD Annual Report, FY 1992.

See 1115

Role ol Community Interviews in the Devel-
opment of a Community Relations Program
for Remediat Response.

See 0485

Role of Expedited Response Actions under

SARA.

See 1116

Role of the Baseline Risk Assessment in
Superfund Remedy Selection Decisions.
See 1075

Roles and Responsibilities of Deputy Project
Officers and Work Assignment Managers
under the Technical Enforcement Support
(TES) Contracts.

See 0069

Roles and Responsibilities of Regional
Project Officers, Zone Project Officers, Work
Assignment Managers and Contracting Offi-
cers for the RCRA Enforcement, Permitting
and Assistance Contracts (REPA).

See 0070

Roles and Responsibilities of Regional
Project Officers and Headquarters Zone
Project Officers for Management of TES
(TES 5) Contracts.

See 0604

Scope of the CERCLA Petroleum Exclusion
under Sections 101(14) and 104(a)(2).
See 0605

Site Assessment: Evaluating Risks at Super-
fund Sites.

See 1076

Site Classification Changes from Enforce-
ment to Fund Lead.

See 0606

SITE Emerging Technologies Project Bab-
cock aid Wilcox Cyclone Vitrification.
See 1303

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by Party Name Report.

See 0607

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by Party Name Report.

See 0608

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by Party Name Report.

See 0609

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
Frequency by PRP Name Report, September
26,1991.

See 0610

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)

(National).

See 0611

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National Alphabetical Report by PRP Name,
September 26, 1991.

See 0812

Site Enforcement Tracklrg System (SEIS)
(National) (for Microcomputers).

Sae 0613

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National Frequency by PRP Name Report.
See 0614

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP listing Alphabetically by PRP
Name.

See 0615

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)'.
National PRP Listing Alphabetically by PRP
Name.

See 0616

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Listing by Site.

See 0617

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Listing by Site.

See 0618

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
National PRP Report by ate, September 26,
1991.

See 0619

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS)
(National - 3 1/2 Inch Diskette, IBM PS/2
Compatible) (for Microcomputers).

See 0620

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.

SB© Q821

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by ate for Alabama.

See 0622

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Alabama.

See 0623

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for American Samoa.
See 0624

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for American Samoa.
See 0625

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for American Samoa.
See 0626

ate Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.

See 0627

Ste Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.

See 0628

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Arizona.

See 0629

SU-34

-------
SUBJECT INDEX

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.

See 0630

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.

See 0631

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Arkansas.

See 0632

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site (or California.

See 0633

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for California.

See 0634

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for California.

See 0635

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.

See 0636

Sit# Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Colorado.

See 0637

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site tor Colorado.

See 0636

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
See 0639

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
See 0640

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Connecticut.
See 0841

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.

See 0642

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.

See 0643

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Delaware.

See 0644

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Florida.

See 0645

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Florida.

See 0646

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Sita for Florida.

See 0847

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.

See 064S

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.

See 0649

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Georgia.

See 0660

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.

See 0651

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Idaho.

See 0652

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP listing by Site for Idaho.

See 0653

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.

See 0654

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.

See 0655

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Illinois.

See 0656

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Sit# for Indiana.

Sea 0657

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.

See 0658

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Indiana.

Sea 0658

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Iowa,

See 0660

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Iowa,

See 0661

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Iowa.

See 0662

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.

See 0663

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.

See 0664

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kansas.

See 0665

Sit# Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky,

See 0666

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky,

See 0667

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Kentucky,

See 0668

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.

See 0669

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.

See 0670

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Louisiana.

See 0671

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maine.

See 0672

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Maine.

See 0673

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maine.

See 0674

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.

See 0675

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.

See 0676

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Maryland.

See 0677

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts
See 0678

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
See 0679

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Massachusetts.
See 0680

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.

See 0661

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.

See 0662

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Michigan.

See 0683

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.

See 0684

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.

See 0685

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Minnesota.

See 0686

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.

See 0687

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.

See 0636

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Mississippi.

See 0689

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Missouri.

See 0690

Ste Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP listing by Site for Missouri.

See 0691

ate Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site (or Missouri.

See 0692

Ste Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP listing by Site for Montana.

See 0693

ate Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP listing by Site for Montana,

See 0694

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Montana.

See 0698

ate Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska.

See 0696

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska,

See 0697

Sits Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Nebraska,

See 0698

ate Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Nevada
See 0699

Sit# Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
TOP Listing by Site for Nevada.

See 0700

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site tor Nevada.

See 0701

ate Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire,
See 0702

ate Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
See 0708

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for New Hampshire.
See 0704

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PHP Listing by Site for New Jersey.

Sea 0705

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.

See 0706

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Jersey.

See 0707

ate Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New Mexico,
See 0708

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site tor New Mexico.
See 0709

SU-35

-------
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

SUBJECT INDEX

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
RRP Listing by Site for Naw Mexico.
See 0710

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP listing by Site for New York.

S@6 9711

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
RRP Listing by Site for New York.

Sea 0712

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for New York.

Sea 0713

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
See 0714

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
See 071S

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Carolina.
See 0716

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Dakota.
See 0717

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Dakota.
See 0718

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for North Dakota.
See 0719

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Northern Marianas.
See 0720

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Northern Marianas.
Sea 0721

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Northern Marianas.
See 0722

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.

See 0723

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.

See 0724

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Ohio.

See 0725

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma
See 0726

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.

See 0727

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Oklahoma.

See 0728

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.

See 0729

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.

See 0730

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Oregon.

See 0731

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania
See 0732

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
See 0733

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Pennsylvania.
Sea 0734

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.
See 0735

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.

See 0736

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Puerto Rico.

See 0737

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1,

See 0738

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1.

See 0739

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1, January
22, 1992.

Sea 0741

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 1. Volume 1.
See 0742

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2.

See 0743

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2.

See 0744

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2, January
22,1092.

See 0746

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 2. Volume 2.
See 0747

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 3.

See 0748

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 3, January
22,1992.

See 0750

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Region 3. Volume 3.
See 0751

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4.

See 0752

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4.

See 0753

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4, January
22, 1992.

See 0755

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 4. Volume 4.
See 0756

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5.

See 0757

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5.

See 0758

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 5, January
22,1992.

See 0760

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site lor Region 5. Volume 5.
See 0761

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6.

See 0762

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6.

See 0763

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6, January
22, 1992.

See 0765

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 6. Volume 6.
See 0766

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7.

Sea 0767

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7.

See 0768

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7, January
22, 1992.

See 0770

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 7. Volume 7.
See 0771

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8.

See 0772

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8.

See 0773

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8, January
22, 1992.

See 0775

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 8. Volume 8.
See 0776

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9.

See 0777

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9.

See 0778

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9, January
22,1992.

See 0780

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 9. Volume 9.
See 0781

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Sit© for Region 10.

See 0782

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS):
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10.

See 0783

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10, January
22,1992.

See 0785

Site Enforcement Tracking System (SETS);
PRP Listing by Site for Region 10. Volume
10.