Questions and Answers

The following are responses to questions the Agency received in connection with
outreach sessions EPA held with stakeholders on the proposed rule. The
questions relate to issues already addressed in the proposal. The information
below summarizes and distills information contained in the Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) to make it more accessible for the public. Citations to the
relevant pages in the NPRM are also provided.

As EPA noted during the outreach sessions, anyone with comments they wish
the Agency to consider on the proposed designation rulemaking should follow
the instructions provided in the Federal Register 87 FR 54415 (Sept. 6, 2022)
available here. As EPA has previously stated, public comments on the proposal
are due on November 7, 2022, which has provided the public with adequate time
to comment on the proposal.

1. How does this action help local and state governments, tribal nations, or
members of the public concerned about PFAS contamination?

If finalized, the proposed rule, would:

•	Increase transparency around PFOA/PFOS releases, improve EPA, state,
Tribal nation, and local community understanding of the extent and locations
of PFOA and PFOS contamination throughout the country, and help all
communities to avoid or reduce contact with these potentially dangerous
chemicals;

•	Provide additional tools that EPA and other government agencies could use
to conduct faster cleanups at contaminated sites, which would provide public
health protection for affected communities and help to hold polluters
accountable for cleaning up their contamination;

•	Support other actions taken by EPA, other Federal agencies, states, Tribal
Nations and international bodies that have set PFOA and PFOS benchmarks
and standards and have undertaken PFOA- and PFOS based regulatory
activities and enforcement actions; and

•	Create incentives for better waste management and treatment by facilities
handing PFOA or PFOS.

These issues are generally discussed throughout the NPRM. For example, see 87
FRat 54418.

October 28, 2022

1


-------
2.	What are the reporting requirements for certain entities using PFOA and
PFOS?

If finalized, any person in charge of a vessel or facility must report releases of PFOA
and PFOS of one pound or more within a 24-hour period to the National Response
Center, State or Tribal Emergency Response Commission, and the Local or Tribal
Emergency Planning Committee (local emergency responders).

For more information, this issue is generally discussed on 87 FR at 54419.

3.	What is a reportable quantity? What is the reportable quantity for
PFOA/PFOS?

A reportable quantity (RQ) is the amount of a hazardous substance, at or above
which, when released into the environment within a 24-hour period, requires
notification to the National Response Center, state or Tribal emergency response
commissions, and the local or Tribal emergency planning committees. Section
102(b) of CERCLA provides that, until superseded by regulation, the reportable
quantity for any hazardous substance is one pound. The RQ for PFOA and PFOS is
one pound. For more on reportable quantities:

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2011-title40-vol28/pdf/CFR-2011-title40-
vol28~part302.pdf

For more information, these issues are generally discussed on 87 FR at 54419 and
54429.

4.	How have PFOA and PFOS releases been addressed through CERCLA to
date? Does EPA expect to respond to past releases?

CERCLA already provides EPA authority to address PFOA and PFOS releases
because these two chemicals are pollutants and contaminants. With respect to
releases or substantial threat of releases of pollutants and contaminants, EPA can
respond if the Agency finds that the release or threat of release may present an
imminent and substantial danger to the public health or welfare. In addition,
response actions may already have addressed PFOA/PFOA releases if those
chemicals were comingled with hazardous substances.

Responses can involve undertaking a removal action (if the situation presents a
more immediate threat) or by assessing whether to use the National Priorities List
(NPL) listing process that is the first step towards a longer-term remedial action.

This rule, if finalized, will allow EPA to respond without making a determination of
imminent and substantial danger and will allow EPA to seek to recover cleanup
costs from potentially responsible parties based on site-specific circumstances.

October 28, 2022

2


-------
These issues are generally discussed throughout the NPRM. For example, see 87
FR at 54420.

5.	If the rule is finalized, will EPA re-evaluate current NPL sites for PFOA or PFOS
releases? Does EPA expect to require the cleanup of PFOA and PFOS at
existing sites with records of decision (RODs)?

Throughout the Superfund process, from the remedial investigation through site
cleanup, CERCLA authorizes EPA to evaluate releases and threats of releases of
hazardous substances, and pollutants or contaminants. Since PFOA and PFOS are
already pollutants or contaminants, they are within the scope of the investigation,
cleanup, and review processes for existing NPL sites.

For more information, these issues are generally discussed on 87 FR at 54420.

6.	Does EPA plan to initiate rulemaking to list PFOA and PFOS as hazardous
wastes under RCRA?

EPA is not currently planning a rule to list PFOA and PFOS as hazardous wastes,
but the Agency is currently working on a proposed rule, which is scheduled to be
published in Summer of 2023, to list four PFAS as RCRA hazardous constituents
under 40 C.F.R. Part 261 Appendix VIII.

For more information, these issues are generally discussed on 87 FR at 54431.

7. What are the most likely sources for public exposure?

The proposed rule provides some discussion of potential public exposure on pages
54425 to 54429. Additional information is available here:

https://www.epa.gov/pfas/our-current~understandinq~human~health~and~
environmental-risks-pfas.

October 28, 2022

3


-------