SEPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
GD-54
Methods 1-5, 6C, 7E, 10, and 29
Revision 1
February 1, 2021
Observer/Report Review Checklists for Source Tests
The following checklists are to assist the on-site observer during a performance or compliance test. These checklists
were developed with the expectation that the observer has a general working knowledge of the applicable test
method(s). For each question on the checklists, the corresponding test method section citation is included to the left of
the question. Use of these checklists does not in and of itself create a regulatory requirement for each item in the
checklist. Rather, these checklists are intended to serve as an informative aid to the observer of source tests and to the
reviewer of source test reports.
The checklists contained in this package cover the following:
• Pre-Test Questionnaire;
• Methods 1-4;
• Method 5;
• Instrumental Methods 3A-O2/CO2, 6C-SO2, 7E-NOx, and 10-CO;
• Method 29; and
• Contents of a source test report.
Before observing the source test, the following activities should be considered:
• Review the Pre-Test Questionnaire;
• Review the applicable standards for the source (permit, NSPS, NESHAP, etc.);
• Read the approved test protocol;
• Review any previous test reports;
• Read the performance standard(s)/test method(s) listed in the test protocol;
• Review the checklists. If you have questions, refer to the citation to the left of the question or additional
information on the EMC website (https://www.epa.gov/emc): and
• Contact the site test coordinator to get a list of security and health and safety requirements necessary to get on
site.
Strongly encourage the testing company to completely fill out the Pre-Test Questionnaire. Using the information
provided on the Pre-Test Questionnaire, determine the traverse points, calculate nozzle size(s), and review the
calibration data. When on-site, check the information provided and compare traverse points and nozzle size
determinations with the tester. Check that the calibration records provided are for the equipment being used for the
source test. Inspect pitot tips for damage.
INTRO
Page i
-------
SEPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
GD-54
Methods 1-5, 6C, 7E, 10, and 29
Revision 1
February 1, 2021
On the day of the test, be sure to have your ID and safety cards, appropriate and required personal protective
equipment (PPE), and checklists together before entering the facility. When arriving at the test site, let the lead for the
testing company/facility representative (test coordinator) know the information you will collecting, which should include
but not be limited to:
• Equipment calibration sheets;
• Daily calibration sheets;
• Certificate of Analysis of cylinder gases;
• Field data sheets;
• Recovery data sheets; and
• Chains of custody.
During your observation of the test, if you notice anything wrong or done well, let the source testing lead and facility
test coordinator know. If something is being or was performed incorrectly, it may be possible to correct the problem and
save the test run. If something was performed well, letting the test team know may ease tension and open up
communication. Either way, speak up.
INTRO
Page ii
-------
SEPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
GD-54
Methods 1-5, 6C, 7E, 10, and 29
Revision 1
February 1, 2021
Pre-Test Questionnaire
PLEASE COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THIS QUESTIONNAIRE 7 DAYS PRIOR TO THE TEST
Facility Contact / Phone :
Testing Firm / Contact:
Permit #:
Source Tested:
Applicable Regulation(s) / Pollutant(s)
Process Data / Production Rate :
Is there an approved test protocol? If yes, please submit it with this questionnaire.
YES
NO
Are there any anticipated or expected deviations or alternatives from the approved test methods? YES NO
If yes, note in the comments section below
Have you or your company tested this source before?
YES
NO
Are there any diagrams/schematics/pictures of testing location(s)? If yes, please submit it with this YES NO
questionnaire.
Are the testing location adequate to perform testing safely and accurately?
YES
NO
Do sampling location(s) meet the criteria of Method 1? If not, please provide testing approach in YES NO
comments below.
Are the planned total sampling times and volumes greater than or equal to the specified test
procedures?
YES
NO
Comments:
Pre-test
Page 1
-------
SEPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
GD-54
Methods 1-5, 6C, 7E, 10, and 29
Revision 1
February 1, 2021
Please provide a proposed schedule for testing in Table 1.
Please provide a schematic of the testing location(s) in Figures 1 & 2.
Please provide calibration records for all testing equipment to be used during this source test program. If the
most current calibration is not available for this submission, please provide the most recent calibration or
standard operating procedures (SOPs) for equipment calibrations and have the current calibration available on
the first day of testing.
Pre-test
Page 2
-------
SEPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
GD-54
Methods 1-5, 6C, 7E, 10, and 29
Revision 1
February 1, 2021
Table 1. Source Testing Daily Schedule
Test
Day
Date
Activity
Total Daily
Hrs
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
Example of Source Testing Daily Schedule
Test
Day
Date
Activity
Total Daily
Hrs
1
AM
Safety training and set-up
10
PM
RATA
2
AM
Runs 1 & 2 (M5/26A and CEMS)
10
PM
Run 3 (M5/26A and CEMS) and breakdown
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
AM
PM
Pre-test
Page 3
-------
&EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
GD-54
Methods 1-5, 6C, 7E, 10, and 29
Revision 1
February 1, 2021
Schematic of Source(s)
Stack Diameter
Port "A" Length
Port "B" Length
Upstream
Downstream
Pre-test
Page 4
-------
v>EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
GD-54
Methods 1-5, 6C, 7E, 10, and 29
Revision 1
January 12, 2021
Date:
Observer:
Observer Checklist - Methods 1-4
Facility Name / Location :
Facility Contact / Phone :
Testing Firm / Contact:
Permit #:
Source Tested:
Applicable Regulation(s) / Pollutant(s) :
Process Data / Production Rate :
If the answer is NO to any questions below, provide comments.
Method 1 - Sample and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Sources
YES
NO
§ 11.2
Were traverse points determined correctly? (see Figures PRELIM-1 and 2)
§ 11.4
Was a cyclonic flow check completed? (Avg of absolute value of all angles <20°)
§ 11.5
Alternative Measurement Site Selection (answer questions below only if needed)
§ 11.5.2
Were a minimum of 40 traverse points (42 pts for rectangular ducts) used for gas flow
angle determination?
§ 11.5.3.1
Did the pre-test leak check pass? (optional) Leak rate:
§ 11.5.3.2
Is the manometer leveled and zeroed?
§ 11.5.3.3
Were the yaw angles and pressure readings for pitch angle recorded?
§ 11.5.3.3
Was a back purge completed between traverse points?
§ 11.5.3.4
Did the post-test lek check pass? (mandatory) Leak rate:
Method 2 - Determination of Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate
YES
NO
§8.1
Is the measurement system set up properly? (see Figure PRELIM-3)
§8.2
Is the manometer level and zeroed correctly?
§8.3
Are the velocity and stack temperature recorded at each sampling point?
§8.3
Are the pitot tube leak checks completed after each run?
§8.4
Was the static pressure measured during the test day?
§8.5
Is the barometric pressure recorded and adjusted for elevation (if needed)?
§ 10.1
Visual check of pitot tube heads - good condition?
M 1-4
Page 1
-------
SEPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
GD-54
Methods 1-5, 6C, 7E, 10, and 29
Revision 1
February 1, 2021
Date:
Observer:
Observer Checklist - Methods 1-4 (continued)
Method 3 - Gas Analysis for O2, CO2, and Dry Molecular Weight
YES
NO
If Method 3A is being used to determine 02 and C02 concentrations, skip this section.
§8.0
Single- or multi-point sampling used? Circle answer.
§8.0
Grab or integrated sampling used? Circle answer.
§8.0
Orsat or Fyrites being used? Circle answer.
§11.0
Is Orsat performed in triplicate? Is analysis consistent?
Method 4 - Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases
YES
NO
Method 5, 6A, 320, and using F-factors are acceptable alternatives to Method 4.
§8.1.1.2
Minimum sample volume of 0.60 scm (21 scf) at < 0.021 m3/min (0.75cfm) achieved?
§8.1.2.1
Was the sampling train set up correctly? (see Figure PRELIM-4)
§8.1.3.1
Did the pre-test leak check pass? (optional) Leak rate:
§8.1.4.1
Temperature at the exit of impingers/condenser <68 °F?
8.1.4.2
Did the post-test leak check pass? (mandatory) Leak rate:
§12.1.6
From point to point, was the AVm >10% from the average sampling rate?
§12.1.7
For saturated or moisture-laden gas steam, was the lower Bws used?
Comments:
M 1-4
Page 2
-------
&EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
GD-54
Methods 1-5, 6C, 7E, 10, and 29
Revision 1
February 1, 2021
Figure PRELIM-1. Minimum Number of Traverse Point for Particulate Traverse
Dust
50
:
...
::
:
20
to
JJL
JL&.
" fmm Pomi «f Any I|$w <*
¦sfc. }
'I- f » 'I -t .<«« A)
—~~
a of t11
—^w -
« 0.30 to 0 61m ('(t - 24 *» *
2
Duct
9 1#
f(mmlrnnm fli
M 1-4
Page 3
-------
&EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
GD-54
Methods 1-5, 6C, 7E, 10, and 29
Revision 1
February 1, 2021
Figure PRELIM-2. Minimum Number of Traverse Point for Velocity (non-particulate) Traverse
50
Ouet BiltBllfflfll M MlWMnnHTWlt Si# is llDiSttflilffl flRXIt PI* DlgllifteiflC* M
os it is a.o as
40
3®
,,,,
10
it pe»»»
i Prom Point at Any T ypt of
' , n » h ! l •( ;
J
3
—? .T
A
f ^
II;
;Di*trwtor>0.*1
t2 potertt
\
J ft or 9 *
points
10
M 1-4
Page 4
-------
&EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
GD-54
Methods 1-5, 6C, 7E, 10, and 29
Revision 1
February 1, 2021
Figure PRELIM-3. Pitot Tube and Manometer Assembly
IK!
M 1-4
Page 5
-------
&EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
GD-54
Methods 1-5, 6C, 7E, 10, and 29
Revision 1
February 1, 2021
Figure PRELIM-4. Method 4 Sampling Train Assembly
I
I
.1
I
I
r- ::
¦j ,i
II „
a I
M 1-4
Page 6
-------
SEPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
GD-54
Methods 1-5, 6C, 7E, 10, and 29
Revision 1
February 1, 2021
Date:
Observer:
Observer Checklist - Reference Method 5 - Particulate Matter Emissions
Facility Name / Location :
Facility Contact / Phone :
Testing Firm / Contact:
Permit #:
Source Tested:
Applicable Regulation(s) / Pollutant(s)
Process Data / Production Rate :
Method 5 - Determination of Particulate Matter Emissions from Stationary Sources
YES
NO
If the answer is NO to any questions, provide comments below.
§8.2.4
Is the planned total sampling time and volume greater than or equal to the specified test
procedure?
§8.3
Was the sampling train set up correctly? (see Figure M5-1)
Nozzle Diameter: Probe Length:
§8.3.2
Was the filter properly centered in the filter holder and free from tears?
§8.3.3
Glass or metal probe liner? Circle answer.
§8.4.2
Did the sampling train pre-test leak check pass? (optional)
Leak rate:
§8.4.4
Did the sampling train post-test leak check pass? (mandatory)
Leak rate:
M5
Page 1
-------
SEPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
GD-54
Methods 1-5, 6C, 7E, 10, and 29
Revision 1
February 1, 2021
Date:
Observer:
Observer Checklist - Reference Method 5 - Particulate Matter Emissions (continued)
If the answer is NO to any questions, provide comments below.
YES
NO
§8.5
Was the temperature gas flow through the filter during the run at 120 ± 14 °C (248 ± 25
°F)?
§8.5.1
Is the data being recorded on a datasheet at least once at each sample point during each
time increment?
§8.5.2
Were the portholes cleaned prior to the test run?
§8.5.3
For stack with significant negative pressure, sampling pumps can be started prior to
going into the stack.
§8.5.4
Is the port properly sealed around the sample probe?
§8.5.5
Is the sampling train being traversed per Method 1?
§8.5.6
Is the temperature of the gas exiting the sampling train <20 °C (68° F)?
§8.5.7
Was the test run completed without changing the filter?
§8.5.8
Was the test run completed without changing the sampling train?
§8.6
Was the sampling train operated isokinetically (100 ± 10%)?
Comments:
M5
Page 2
-------
SEPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
GD-54
Methods 1-5, 6C, 7E, 10, and 29
Revision 1
February 1, 2021
Date:
Observer:
Observer Checklist - Reference Method 5 - Particulate Matter Emissions (continued)
If the answer is NO to any questions, provide comments below.
YES
NO
§8.7.1
After the probe has cooled and safe to handle, was any external PM wiped off the nozzle
and then the nozzle capped to prevent losing or gaining PM?
§8.7.5
Was an acetone blank collected?
§8.7.6
Any abnormal conditions noted during inspection of sample train prior to and during
disassembly?
§8.7.6.1
Container 1. Was the filter carefully transferred into a petri dish?
§8.7.6.2
Container 2. Was the front half of the sampling train (nozzle to front half of the filter
holder) properly rinsed?
§8.7.6.3
Container 3. Is the silica gel in good condition? Note the color of the silica gel to
determine if it is spent.
§8.7.6.4
Was the moisture content for the test run determined using the impingers' weight gain?
§10.1
Is the nozzle free of nicks, dents, or corrosion?
§10.2
Are the pitot tubes free of nicks, dents, or corrosion?
Comments:
M5
Page 3
-------
&EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
GD-54
Methods 1-5, 6C, 7E, 10, and 29
Revision 1
February 1, 2021
Figure M5-1. Particulate Sampling Train
M5
Page 4
-------
SEPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
GD-54
Methods 1-5, 6C, 7E, 10, and 29
Revision 1
February 1, 2021
Date:
Observer:
Observer Checklist - Methods 3A, 6C, 7E, or 10
Facility Name / Location :
Facility Contact / Phone :
Testing Firm / Contact:
Permit #:
Source Tested:
Applicable Regulation(s) / Pollutant(s)
Process Data / Production Rate :
Instrumental Methods: 3A-O2/CO2, 6C SO2, 7E-NOx, and 10-CO (circle method(s))
YES
NO
Citations are for Method 7E
If the answer is NO to any questions, provide comment below and see Figure CEMS-2
§8.1
Were the sample point(s) determined correctly?
Are the calibration gas certificates current?
Are the calibration gases within acceptable ranges?
Ic tho c -a m r»l i r\rr c\/ctom nrr*norl\/ rr*nfionrQrJ? (Qaa C*\
§8.2.1
§8.2.1
§8.2.2
Is the sampling system properly configured? (See CEMS-1)
§8.2.3
Is the 3-pt direct calibration error (CE) (or 3-pt system CE for dilution systems) within
±2.0% of the calibration span or <0.5 ppmv absolute difference?
§8.2.4
Method 7E only. Was the N02 to NO conversion efficiency test preformed? Was it >90%?
§8.2.5
Is the initial system bias check (or pre and post 2-pt CE for dilution systems) within ±5.0%
of calibration span or <0.5 ppmv absolute difference?
§8.2.6
What is the system response time?
Response time:
§8.2.7
Was interference test paperwork available and representative?
CEMS
Page 1
-------
SEPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
GD-54
Methods 1-5, 6C, 7E, 10, and 29
Revision 1
February 1, 2021
Date:
Observer:
Observer Checklist - Methods 3A, 6C, 7E, or 10 (continued)
If the answer is NO to any questions, provide comment below and see Figure Instrumental
Methods-2
YES
NO
§8.3
Dilution system only. Is the diluted sample dew point below the sample line and
analyzer temperatures?
§8.3
Dilution system only. Is the dilution ratio consistent through the test runs?
§8.3
Dilution system only. Are the molecular weights (MW) of the calibration and stack gases
addressed in dilution ratio and measurement calculations?
§8.5
Was the post-run system bias check (or 2-pt system CE for dilution systems) within ±5.0%
of calibration span or <0.5 ppmv absolute difference?
§8.5
Was the post-run system drift check within ±3.0% of calibration span or <0.5 ppmv
absolute difference?
§8.6
Was dynamic spiking procedure used?
Comments:
CEMS
Page 2
-------
Figure CEMS-1. Example of equipment configuration.
tSf
Sample
V*nt
Figure CEMS-2. Test Run Calibration Flow Chart
&EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
GD-54
Methods 1-5, 6C, 7E, 10, and 29
Revision 1
February 1, 2021
CEMS
Page 3
-------
SEPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
GD-54
Methods 1-5, 6C, 7E, 10, and 29
Revision 1
February 1, 2021
Date:
Observer:
Observer Checklist - Method 29 - Metals Emissions
Facility Name / Location :
Facility Contact / Phone :
Testing Firm / Contact:
Permit #:
Source Tested:
Applicable Regulation(s) / Pollutant(s)
Process Data / Production Rate :
Method 29 - Metal Emissions from Stationary Sources
YES
NO
If the answer is NO to any questions, provide comment below.
§8.1.3
Was the sampling train set up correctly? (see Figure M29-1)
§8.1.4
Did the sampling train pre-test leak check pass? (optional)
Leak rate:
§8.1.4
Did the sampling train post-test leak check pass? (mandatory)
Leak rate:
§8.1.5
Was the temperature of the gas flow through the filter during the run at 120 ± 14 °C
(248 ±25 °F)?
§8.1.5
For a stack with significant negative pressure, sampling pumps can be started prior to
going into the stack.
§8.1.5
Is the port properly sealed around the sample probe?
§8.1.5
Is the sampling train being traversed per Method 1?
§8.1.5
Is the temperature of the gas exiting the sampling train <20 °C (68° F)?
§8.1.5
Was the test run completed without changing out the filter?
§8.1.5
Was the test run completed without changing out the sampling train?
§8.1.6
Was the sampling train operated isokinetically (100 ± 10%)?
M29
Page 1
-------
SEPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
GD-54
Methods 1-5, 6C, 7E, 10, and 29
Revision 1
February 1, 2021
Date:
Observer:
Observer Checklist - Method 29 - Metals Emissions (continued)
If the answer is NO to any questions, provide comment below.
YES
NO
§8.2.5
Container 1. Was the filter carefully transferred into a petri dish?
§8.2.6
Container 2. If PM is being measured, was the front half of the sampling train (nozzle to
front half of the filter holder) properly rinsed with lOOmls of acetone?
§8.2.7
Container 3. Was the front half of the sampling train (nozzle to front half of the filter
holder) properly rinsed with lOOmls 0.1N HN03?
§8.2.8
Container 4. Were impingers 1 through 3 weighed and then emptied into container 4?
§8.2.8
Was the moisture content for the test run determined using the impingers' weight gain?
§8.2.8
Container 4. Was the back half of the filter holder and all glassware through impinger 3
rinsed with lOOmls 0.1N HN03?
§8.2.9.1
Container 5A. If mercury (Hg) is being measured, was impinger 4 weighed and emptied
into container 5A?
§8.2.9.1
Container 5A. If Hg is being measured, was impinger 4 rinsed with lOOmls of 0.1N HN03?
§8.2.9.2
Container 5B. If Hg is being measured, were impingers 5 and 6 weighed and emptied
into container 5B?
§8.2.9.2
Container 5B. If Hg is being measured, were impingers 5 and 6, and the connecting
glassware triple rinsed with lOOmls of fresh acidified KMn04 solution followed with
lOOmls of reagent grade H20?
§8.2.9.3
Container 5C. If Hg is being measured, were impingers 5 and 6 rinsed the 8N HCI?
§8.2.10
Container 6. Was the silica gel impinger weighed and in good condition?
§8.2.11
Container 7. If PM is being measured, was a 100ml acetone blank taken?
§8.2.12
Container 8A. Was a 300ml 0.1N HN03 blanktaken?
§8.2.13
Container 8B. Was a 100ml reagent water blank taken?
§8.2.14
Container 9. Was a 200ml 5% HNO3/10% H202 blank taken?
§8.2.15
Container 10. If Hg is being measured, was a 100ml acidified KMn04 solution blank
taken?
§8.2.16
Container 11. If Hg is being measured, was a 25ml 8N HCI blank in 200ml of reagent H20
taken?
§8.2.17
Container 12. Was a filter blank taken?
§10.1
Is the nozzle free of nicks, dents, or corrosion?
§10.1
Are the pitot tubes free of nicks, dents, or corrosion?
M29
Page 2
-------
SEPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
GD-54
Methods 1-5, 6C, 7E, 10, and 29
Revision 1
February 1, 2021
Date:
Observer:
Observer Checklist - Method 29 - Metals Emissions (continued)
Comments:
M29
Page 3
-------
&EPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
GD-54
Methods 1-5, 6C, 7E, 10, and 29
Revision 1
February 1, 2021
Figure M29-1. Metals Sampling Train.
M29
Page 4
-------
SEPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
GD-54
Methods 1-5, 6C, 7E, 10, and 29
Revision 1
February 1, 2021
Observer Checklist - Emission Test Report Checklist
Facility Name / Location :
Facility Contact / Phone :
Testing Firm / Contact:
Permit #:
Source Tested:
Applicable Regulation(s) / Pollutant(s) :
Emissions Test Report Checklist
YES
NO
If the answer is NO to any questions below, provide comment below.
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Summary of Test Program
Responsible groups (participating organizations)
Overall purpose of the emission test
Applicable regulations
Industry
Name of facility
Facility location
Processes of interest
Air pollution control equipment, if applicable
Emission points and sampling locations
Pollutants to be measured and testing methods
used
Dates of emission testing
1.2 Key Personnel
Names, affiliations, and telephone numbers of
key personnel
REPORT
Page 1
-------
SEPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
GD-54
Methods 1-5, 6C, 7E, 10, and 29
Revision 1
February 1, 2021
Observer Checklist - Emission Test Report Checklist (continued)
If the answer is NO to any questions below, provide comment below.
YES
NO
2.0 Plant and Sampling Location Description
2.1 Process Description and
Operation
General description of the basic process
Flow diagram (indicate emission and process
test points)
Discussion of typical process operations, such as:
• Production rates;
• Feed material and feed rates or batch
size;
• Equipment sizes and capacities (rates);
and
• Production schedules (hours/day,
days/week, peak periods).
2.2 Control Equipment Description
Description of all air pollution control systems, if
applicable
Discussion of typical control equipment
operation and, if necessary, a schematic.
Discussion on parameter(s) monitored and
monitoring results for parameters for which
operating limits will be set
REPORT
Page 2
-------
SEPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
GD-54
Methods 1-5, 6C, 7E, 10, and 29
Revision 1
February 1, 2021
Observer Checklist - Emission Test Report Checklist (continued)
If the answer is NO to any questions below, provide comment below.
YES
NO
Provide a schematic of each location. Include:
• Duct diameter;
• Direction of flow;
• Dimension (include number of duct
diameters);
• Location and configuration of
c
sampling ports
o
4-»
• Nipple length and port
Q_
2.3 Flue Gas Sampling Location
diameters
o
10
(D
• Number and configuration of
Q
traverse points
c
o
• Confirm that the sampling location met
4-»
ro
u
the EPA Method 1 criteria - If not, give
o
1
reasons and discuss effect on results;
00
c
and
"q.
• Discuss any special traversing or
E
ro
measurement schemes.
U~l
~a
c
ns
4-»
c
_ro
CL
o
(N
2.4 Process Sampling Location
If process stream samples were taken, include
the following:
• Schematic of location, if helpful;
• Description of each sampling or
measurement location;
• Description of procedure used
to obtain samples or
measurements
• Discussion on the
representativeness of each of
the process stream sampling
locations and samples.
REPORT
Page 3
-------
SEPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
GD-54
Methods 1-5, 6C, 7E, 10, and 29
Revision 1
February 1, 2021
Observer Checklist - Emission Test Report Checklist (continued)
If the answer is NO to any questions below, provide comment below.
YES
NO
3.0 Summary and Discussion of Test Results
3.1 Objectives and Test Matrix
Restate the overall purpose of the test program.
List the specific objectives.
Include a test matrix table showing the following
(including schematics, if helpful):
• Run number and date;
• Sample type/pollutant;
• Test method;
• Sampling locations;
• Clock time; and
• Sampling time.
3.2 Field Test Changes and
Problems
List and discussion of any changes in sampling
and analytical methods for emissions or process
information.
3.3 Presentation of Results
Address each of the specific objectives and
present a summary of the results in tabular
form.
• Compare field data sheets with report
tables,
• Compare lab data with report tables,
• Check report calculations
Discuss data.
4.0 Sampling and Analytical
Procedures
4.1 Test Methods
Schematic of each sampling train
Flow diagram of the sample recovery
Flow diagram of the sample analysis
Description of any modifications
Discussion of any problematic sampling or
analytical conditions
4.2 Process Test Methods
Description of procedures used to obtain
process stream samples, process data, and
control equipment data
Calibration procedures for any test equipment, if
appropriate.
REPORT
Page 4
-------
SEPA
United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
GD-54
Methods 1-5, 6C, 7E, 10, and 29
Revision 1
February 1, 2021
Observer Checklist - Emission Test Report Checklist (continued)
If the answer is NO to any questions below, provide comment below.
YES
NO
5.1 QA/QC Problems
QA/QC problems that occurred during the test.
10
Q)
Sample identification and custody problems
+j
For each of the test methods for which an audit
+-»
o
<
was conducted, list (if applicable) the following:
U
• Type of audit;
CJ
<
• Limits of acceptability;
a
c
5.2 QA Audits
• Supplier of audit material;
• Audit procedure; and
(D
4-»
• Summary of results
C
o Calibrations
O
LT)
o Analytical QC
o Sampling QC
Required information from the General
Provision, §60.8(f)(2)(v) but not limited to:
• Test run raw data sheets;
• Instrumental method data;
o Instrument calibration(s)
1/1
(D
U
o QC checks
T3
r~
o Certificate of analysis
0)
a.
• Equipment calibration
a.
<
• Sample calculations;
• Process data; and
• Analytical data
o Record of standard preparation
o Raw data sheets
o Chain-of-custody documentation
Comments:
REPORT
Page 5
------- |