Tampa, FL NATTS Network Assessment Review
• Established 2004: Carbonyls, PMio Metals, and VOCs
o Chromium VI added in 2005; ended in in 2013
o PAHs added in 2008
• For the NATTS Network Assessment (2004-2018):
o 17 of 18 Method Quality Objective (MQO) Core HAPs were included in the national trends
¦ Nickel (PMm): Bias Percent Difference was outside ± 35% for 2013
o 247 of 253 pollutant datasets were suitable for trends analysis
o Annual Average and 3-Year Rolling Average Concentrations were generally flat over time, with the
exception of a few pollutants (benzene, 1,3-butadiene, lead (PMio), naphthalene, and nickel (PMio).
o 100% Reporting of Datasets
• Method Quality Objectives (MQO): 2004-2018
o Completeness: Met 85% completeness in 253 of 253 pollutant datasets
o Method Detection Limits: Met MDL Target Ratio of 1.00 in 242 of 256 pollutant datasets
o Bias: Met ±25% for 214 of 223 pollutant datasets
o Overall Method Precision: Met <15% CV for 81 of 131 pollutant datasets
o Analytical Method Precision: Met <15% CV for 109 of 139 pollutant datasets
• Analytical Laboratories for 2018
voc
Carbonyl
PMio Metals
Chromium VI
PAHs
PCDEM
ERG
EPCHC
NA
ERG
• Equipment Year Deployed
Equipment Type
VOC
Carbonyl
PMio Metals
Chromium VI
PAHs
Sampler
2004
2018
1999
2005
2014
Analytical
2016
2018
2014
2001
2014
Preconcentrator
2014
NA
NA
NA
NA
Standards Preparation
2007
NA
NA
NA
NA
Canister Cleaning
2016
NA
NA
NA
NA
Extraction
NA
NA
2006
2011
2004
-------
National Summary: NATTS data were collected at 27 locations across the United States,
with sites beginning in 2003 or later (Figure 1) for 19 core HAPs. Over 528,000 concentrations
(primary, secondary, and replicate) were generated and analyzed for this assessment. Pollutant
datasets were scored to assess whether they were suitable for trends analysis. Each
pollutant dataset was evaluated against four MQOs: Completeness; Sensitivity; Bias; and
Precision. Datasets that were suitable (A- or B-rated) for six consecutive years were used for
national trends analysis (Table 1).
National trends were determined by comparing the most recent 3-year blocked averages
(e.g., 2013-2015 vs. 2016-2018) to determine if the NATTS Trends DQO was being met:
To be able to detect a al5percent difference (trend) between the annual mean
concentrations of successive 3-year periods within acceptable levels of decision error.
Of the 19 core HAPs. 18 were assessed for the NATTS Trends DQO. Due to sampling and
analytical issues, acrolein was not considered for trends analysis (Table 2). This assessment
showed that across the network, 15 of those 18 pollutants were decreasing between the
3-year blocks, while two of those pollutants were increasing between the 3-year blocks.
One pollutant did not exhibit a trend.
Table 1. NATTS Network Assessment: Count and Percentage of Suitable
Datasets by Pollutant Group
Pollutant Group
A-rated
B-rated
Does Not Meet
#
%
#
%
#
%
VOCs
1,452
53%
737
27%
555
20%
Carbonyls
523
67%
193
25%
66
8%
PM10 Metals
1,418
61%
685
30%
213
9%
Chromium VI
159
74%
29
13%
27
13%
PAHs
410
74%
124
22%
18
3%
Total = 6,609
3,962
60%
1,768
27%
879
13%
Table 2. Three-Year Block Averages for National Trends
Pollutant
Units
# Sites
Block 1
Block 2
% Difference
Acetaldehyde
Hg/m3
19
1.51
1.39
-7.7%
Arsenic (PM10)
ng/m
21
0.71
0.68
-3.2%
Benzene
Hg/m3
19
0.65
0.59
-10.2%
Figure 1. NATTS Site and Year Established
Benzo(a)pyrene
ng/m3
21
0.113
0.087
-23.2%
Seattle, ,
Beryllium (PM10)
ng/m3
20
0.012
0.009
-26.4%
Butadiene, 1,3-
Hg/m3
19
0.071
0.063
-10.9%
Portland (#1), OR* Portland (#2), OR _ ^ / \
• > ' \ ; " I I >
Cadmium (PM10)
ng/m3
21
0.170
0.097
-43.0%
* »•* l | - Underbill.Vt
/l_a Grande (#1), OR*-' '"•••JL. • _ _ j ,,l M/ i ' \ f
} /. a V«?i-7S»" I s ') H or icon.' Wit' \ \ "-Roxbury. MA
j... ¦ La Grande (#2), OR i f c-/ . * ] Rochester, NY \ I ...-S
) / ; I | May ville.Wr >f, \~ V
/ i ! I -->.#/ \ Detroit; Ml f
- — — ; I i J \ j X. Providence, Rl
f / Bountiful'UT | X — \ ^f- .Bronx (#1), NY"
\ 1 ™ . \ Chicago, IL ¦ ; _ j \ S
_ X \ ' . 1, , Washington^D.C. "w
SanJoBB.CA j [ ^
, Grand Junction. CO V St Louis MO Grayson Lake. KY J ' Bronit (#2), NV"
\ \ _ ' 1 v. U-.--.'1" . ,-.v * Richmond. -VA
S \ _ : i . \ i i*/ '
. . . \ ' v • - — -1 _ Vs Hazard, KY*--^-""?" / j
Los Angeles, CA \J ; j_ | _ J _ r - "[¦/
- Rubidoux, CA i / £' y-""" /
• X: / >' ' 1 / T \Chesterf ield, SC
NATTS Sites phoenix.AZ / ; —J / 1 j. /
; i Karnack, TX ) South DeKalb, GA y
~ Rural \ j | J , > /
O Urban X \ t ; \ ,r(
NATTS - Year Established Houston, ri ^\
| 2003 "^T.mp,.FL
¦ 2004 \ Pinellas County, FL, 'i
1 "> ./ 'i. 1
¦ 2007 1 >
"ft
¦ 2008
| | 2009
2010
2016
?ni7 * The Hazare|. Mayville, Wl, La Grande <#1), OR, Portland (#1), OR, sites were relocated in 2008, 2009, 2016, and 2017, respectively.
"The Bronx (#1), NY site temporarily moved to the Bronx (#2), NY site from mid-2010 to mid-2012.
Carbon Tetrachloride
Hg/m3
15
0.59
0.56
-4.7%
Chloroform
Hg/m3
20
0.256
0.255
-0.4%
Chromium VI
ng/m
18
0.029
0.026
-7.7%
Formaldehyde
Hg/m3
19
2.77
2.68
-3.3%
Lead (PM10)
ng/m
21
3.08
2.81
-8.9%
Manganese (PM10)
ng/m3
20
8.06
7.93
-1.6%
Naphthalene
ng/m3
20
66.70
51.08
-23.4%
Nickel (PM10)
ng/m3
19
1.28
1.05
-18.0%
T etracliloroethylene
ng/m3
19
0.149
0.174
17.2%
T ricliloroethylene
ng/m3
19
0.020
0.022
10.7%
Vinyl Cliloride
ng/m3
17
0.0051
0.0048
-5.5%
Page 1 of 25
-------
NATTS Monitoring Site Report: Tampa, FL
Site Information
Figure 2. NATTS Site Location
Region
4
NATTS Site Type
Urban
County
Hillsborough
AQS Site Code
12-057-3002
NATTS Operating Agency
Env. Prot. Commis. Hillsborough County
Latitude
27.96565
Longitude
-82.2304
AQS Land Use
Residential
AQS Location Setting
Rural
10-Mile Population
1,291,578
Pollutant Datasets Evaluation: Suitable for Trends (Y=yes; Y(T
=yes, and used for DQO Trends; N=No; "~"=not rated
Final Pollutant Name
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Acetaldehyde
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Arsenic (PM10)
Na
Na
Na
Na
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Benzene
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Benzo(a)pyrene
~
—
—
~
--
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Beryllium (PM10)
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Butadiene, 1,3-
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Cadmiuni (PM10)
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Carbon tetrachloride
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Chloroform
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Chromium VI
--
Y
Y
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
~
..
--
~
..
—
Formaldehyde
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Lead (PMW)
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Manganese (PM10)
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
YfT)
Naphthalene
~
--
--
—
--
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Nickel (PM|0)
Y
Y
Na
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Nb
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Tetrachloroethylene
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
T richloroethylene
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Vinyl chloride
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
Y(T)
a: Reported MDL to NATTS Target Ratio greater than 2.0
b: Bias % Difference was outside ± 35% for 2013; Analytical Precision data was not reported to EPA for 2013.
Page 2 of 25
-------
Table 3. NATTS Network Assessment Data (2003-2018) - National Distribution Statistics By Type3
Analyte
Units
Site Type
# Data
Records
%
Detections
Arithmetic
Meanb
Percentile Value0
5th
10th
25th
50th
75th
90th
95th
Acetaldehyde
ng/m3
Urban
15,704
100%
1.77 ± 0.02
0.50
0.66
0.97
1.45
2.19
3.24
4.04
ng/m3
Rural
4,930
100%
1.20 ± 0.04
0.36
0.46
0.65
0.93
1.38
2.02
2.76
ng/m3
All Sites
20,634
100%
1.63 ± 0.02
0.44
0.58
0.86
1.31
2.00
3.02
3.86
Arsenic (PM10)
ng/m3
Urban
14,968
97%
0.89 ± 0.04
0.10
0.19
0.34
0.58
0.99
1.70
2.41
ng/m3
Rural
4,622
96%
0.49 ± 0.02
0.04
0.08
0.17
0.35
0.59
0.94
1.28
ng/m3
All Sites
19,590
97%
0.79 ± 0.03
0.06
0.14
0.29
0.52
0.89
1.54
2.19
Benzene
Hg/m3
Urban
15,984
99%
0.86 ± 0.01
0.25
0.30
0.43
0.66
1.05
1.64
2.21
Hg/m3
Rural
2,494
95%
0.43 ± 0.02
0.04
0.13
0.21
0.33
0.52
0.78
1.01
Hg/m3
All Sites
18,478
99%
0.81 ± 0.01
0.19
0.26
0.39
0.61
0.98
1.55
2.09
Benzo(a)pyrene
ng/m3
Urban
12,336
70%
0.096 ± 0.004
ND
ND
ND
0.04
0.11
0.24
0.37
ng/m3
Rural
3,179
36%
0.067 ± 0.009
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.02
0.13
0.37
ng/m3
All Sites
15,515
63%
0.090 ± 0.004
ND
ND
ND
0.03
0.10
0.23
0.37
Beryllium (PM10)
ng/m3
Urban
15,783
75%
0.051 ± 0.006
ND
ND
0.00003
0.005
0.018
0.050
0.101
ng/m3
Rural
4,687
49%
0.023 ± 0.003
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.005
0.017
0.072
ng/m3
All Sites
20,470
69%
0.045 ± 0.005
ND
ND
ND
0.003
0.012
0.049
0.100
Butadiene, 1,3-
Hg/m3
Urban
15,388
81%
0.092 ± 0.002
ND
ND
0.025
0.058
0.114
0.215
0.302
ng/m3
Rural
2,185
29%
0.012 ± 0.001
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.017
0.046
0.059
ng/m3
All Sites
17,573
75%
0.082 ± 0.002
ND
ND
ND
0.049
0.104
0.199
0.287
Cadmium (PM10)
ng/m3
Urban
16,360
92%
0.21 ± 0.02
ND
0.01
0.05
0.09
0.17
0.42
0.63
ng/m3
Rural
4,684
87%
0.10 ± 0.01
ND
ND
0.03
0.06
0.11
0.20
0.29
ng/m3
All Sites
21,044
91%
0.18 ± 0.01
ND
0.01
0.04
0.08
0.16
0.35
0.56
Carbon Tetrachloride
ng/m3
Urban
14,713
99%
0.569 ± 0.003
0.361
0.433
0.496
0.562
0.651
0.737
0.798
ng/m3
Rural
2,189
92%
0.534 ± 0.016
ND
0.180
0.402
0.537
0.633
0.727
0.798
ng/m3
All Sites
16,902
98%
0.565 ± 0.003
0.304
0.408
0.490
0.559
0.649
0.736
0.798
Chloroform
ng/m3
Urban
16,068
87%
0.265 ± 0.022
ND
ND
0.093
0.132
0.217
0.420
0.668
ng/m3
Rural
3,802
43%
0.052 ± 0.003
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.095
0.144
0.230
ng/m3
All Sites
19,870
79%
0.224 ± 0.018
ND
ND
0.064
0.113
0.196
0.364
0.586
Chromium VI
ng/m3
Urban
8,414
74%
0.036 ± 0.002
ND
ND
ND
0.020
0.042
0.081
0.120
ng/m3
Rural
2,586
41%
0.018 ± 0.004
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.017
0.031
0.051
ng/m3
All Sites
11,000
66%
0.032 ± 0.001
ND
ND
ND
0.016
0.036
0.073
0.114
Page 3 of 25
-------
Table 3. NATTS Network Assessment Data (2003-2018) - National Distribution Statistics By Type3
Analyte
Units
Site Type
# Data
Records
%
Detections
Arithmetic
Meanb
Percentile Value0
5th
10th
25th
50th
75th
90th
95th
Formaldehyde
ng/m3
Urban
16,118
100%
3.11 ± 0.04
0.66
0.99
1.60
2.47
3.84
5.63
7.25
ng/m3
Rural
5,002
100%
2.22 ± 0.05
0.53
0.68
1.06
1.69
2.74
4.19
5.45
ng/m3
All Sites
21,120
100%
2.90 ± 0.04
0.61
0.86
1.43
2.29
3.59
5.38
6.96
Lead (PM10)
ng/m3
Urban
16,366
100%
4.21 ± 0.13
0.72
0.98
1.55
2.64
4.56
8.35
11.90
ng/m3
Rural
4,680
99%
2.10 ± 0.16
0.37
0.50
0.84
1.41
2.37
3.91
5.36
ng/m3
All Sites
21,046
99%
3.74 ± 0.11
0.55
0.80
1.31
2.31
4.04
7.41
10.56
Manganese (PM10)
ng/m3
Urban
16,141
100%
9.80 ± 0.32
1.09
1.51
2.52
4.92
10.21
20.10
30.08
ng/m3
Rural
4,627
99%
3.96 ± 0.14
0.46
0.73
1.36
2.57
4.75
8.54
12.13
ng/m3
All Sites
20,768
100%
8.50 ± 0.25
0.85
1.23
2.15
4.18
8.89
17.98
26.70
Naphthalene
ng/m3
Urban
12,332
100%
74.63 ± 1.14
15.62
21.27
33.55
55.89
94.64
150.05
196.16
ng/m3
Rural
3,301
100%
24.47 ± 1.38
3.74
4.73
7.74
13.86
26.25
50.88
79.17
ng/m3
All Sites
15,633
100%
64.04 ± 1.00
6.58
10.92
23.37
45.59
83.31
137.54
181.75
Nickel (PM10)
ng/m3
Urban
16,125
97%
1.85 ± 0.05
0.25
0.41
0.67
1.11
2.00
3.52
5.27
ng/m3
Rural
4,623
85%
0.65 ± 0.08
ND
ND
0.10
0.28
0.64
1.15
1.89
ng/m3
All Sites
20,748
94%
1.58 ± 0.04
ND
0.15
0.47
0.92
1.73
3.14
4.74
T etrachloroethylene
Hg/m3
Urban
15,612
86%
0.25 ± 0.01
ND
ND
0.06
0.13
0.25
0.48
0.74
Hg/m3
Rural
2,272
36%
0.09 ± 0.04
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.04
0.08
0.16
Hg/m3
All Sites
17,884
79%
0.23 ± 0.01
ND
ND
0.04
0.11
0.22
0.44
0.70
T richloroethylene
Hg/m3
Urban
15,843
41%
0.040 ± 0.002
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.051
0.107
0.164
ng/m3
Rural
3,388
13%
0.021 ± 0.003
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.017
0.250
ng/m3
All Sites
19,231
36%
0.037 ± 0.002
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.041
0.105
0.167
Vinyl Chloride
ng/m3
Urban
14,778
19%
0.0044 ± 0.0003
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.0137
0.0257
ng/m3
Rural
2,444
8%
0.0040 ± 0.0009
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.0156
ng/m3
All Sites
17,222
17%
0.0043 ± 0.0003
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.0126
0.0254
3 Statistics presented are from pollutant datasets which were suitable for trends.
b The arithmetic mean is the average of all samples results which include actual measured values. If no chemical was registered, then a value of zero is
used when calculating the mean.
c ND: No results of this chemical were registered by the laboratory analytical equipment.
Page 4 of 25
-------
Table 4. Summary Statistics for Tampa, FL
Analyte
Units
# Data
Records
%
Detection
Arithmetic Mean3
Percentile Valueb
5th
10th
25th
50th
75th
90th
95th
Acetaldehyde
(ig/m3
884
100%
1.41 ± 0.07
0.62
0.71
0.90
1.18
1.62
2.19
2.79
Arsenic (PM10)
ng/m3
897
99%
1.18 ± 0.07
0.19
0.29
0.60
0.89
1.41
2.40
3.36
Benzene
(ig/m3
907
100%
0.43 ± 0.01
0.18
0.21
0.27
0.38
0.51
0.72
0.86
Benzo(a)pyrene
ng/m3
644
47%
0.07 ± 0.01
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.07
0.23
0.34
Beryllium (PM10)
ng/m3
898
87%
0.035 ± 0.004
ND
ND
0.003
0.020
0.050
0.082
0.105
Butadiene, 1,3-
l-tg/m3
907
97%
0.056 ± 0.003
0.013
0.020
0.027
0.044
0.067
0.114
0.137
Cadmium (PM10)
ng/m3
905
98%
0.156 ± 0.015
0.030
0.046
0.077
0.100
0.173
0.273
0.433
Carbon Tetrachloride
l-tg/m3
907
100%
0.519 ± 0.004
0.446
0.459
0.483
0.510
0.545
0.582
0.619
Chloroform
l-tg/m3
907
100%
0.143 ± 0.013
0.079
0.085
0.098
0.118
0.148
0.200
0.250
Chromium VI
ng/m3
501
54%
0.011 ± 0.001
ND
ND
ND
0.006
0.018
0.027
0.037
Formaldehyde
l-tg/m3
884
100%
2.30 ± 0.12
0.90
1.13
1.49
2.01
2.69
3.45
4.04
Lead (PM10)
ng/m3
905
100%
2.24 ± 0.14
0.56
0.76
1.09
1.70
2.69
3.98
5.50
Manganese (PM10)
ng/m3
905
100%
2.65 ± 0.16
0.77
0.94
1.31
2.00
2.93
4.96
6.98
Naphthalene
ng/m3
643
100%
27.12 ± 1.70
5.08
7.33
12.55
20.74
35.84
55.39
73.32
Nickel (PM10)
ng/m3
905
99%
2.35 ± 0.13
0.42
0.54
0.91
1.83
3.15
4.97
6.08
T etrachloroethylene
l-tg/m3
906
86%
0.072 ± 0.005
ND
ND
0.034
0.055
0.094
0.140
0.186
Trichloroethylene
l-tg/m3
905
18%
0.009 ± 0.002
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.032
0.067
Vinyl Chloride
l-tg/m3
907
17%
0.0035 ± 0.0007
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
0.0127
0.0243
3 :The arithmetic mean is the average of all samples results which included actual measured values. If no chemical was registered, then a value of zero is used.
bND: No results of this chemical were registered by the laboratory analytical equipment.
Table 5. Analytical Labs Supporting this Site
Pollutant Group
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
VOCs
--
PCDEM
PCDEM
PCDEM
PCDEM
PCDEM
PCDEM
PCDEM
PCDEM
PCDEM
PCDEM
PCDEM
PCDEM
PCDEM
PCDEM
PCDEM
Carbonyls
-
ERG
ERG
ERG
ERG
ERG
ERG
ERG
ERG
ERG
ERG
ERG
ERG
ERG
ERG
ERG
PM10 Metals
-
EPCHC
EPCHC
EPCHC
EPCHC
EPCHC
EPCHC
EPCHC
EPCHC
EPCHC
EPCHC
EPCHC
EPCHC
EPCHC
EPCHC
EPCHC
Chromium VI
-
-
ERG
ERG
ERG
ERG
ERG
ERG
ERG
ERG
ERG
-
-
-
-
-
PAHs
-
-
-
-
-
ERG
ERG
ERG
ERG
ERG
ERG
ERG
ERG
ERG
ERG
ERG
—: Not Applicable
PCDEM: Pinellas County Department of Environmental Managem EPCHC: Environmental Protection Commission of Hillsborough County
ERG: Eastern Research Group, Inc.
Page 5 of 25
-------
Figure 3. Tampa, FL Annual Average Concentrations
4.0
I
w 2.4
o
1 16
o
a
o
O 0.8
0.0
Tampa, FL
Annual Averages;
Acetaldehyde
*
~
T , f
1 i *
T X T ]
i * j
* l * i
2004 2005 2006 200? 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Year
2.5
-cr
I
s
o
2.0
1.5
1.0
rt
o
U
0.5
0.0
Tampa, FL
Annual Averages:
Arsenic (PM10)
O
< ~ 4 ~
4¥ * ~
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Year
10
0.8
«C
s
3 06
,2
2 0.4
o o;
u
0.0
Tampa, FL
Annual Averages;
Benzene
{
T
±
I i I j i * , J i
i
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 201? 2018
Year
0.5
1
.2
I
0.4
0.3
e
o
U 0.1
Tampa, FL
Annual Averages;
Benzo(a)pyrene
0.0 4—
|
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Year
Page 6 of 25
-------
Figure 3. Tampa, FL Annual Average Concentrations
0.15
0.12
!
a
o
0.09
0.06
o
O 0.03
0.00
Tampa, FL
Annual Averages:
Beryllium (PM10)
4 >
i
» ~ * ~
20» 2005 2006 200? 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2018 2017 2018
Year
Tampa, FL
Annual Averages:
1,3-Butadiene
0.20
0.16
~|j 0.12
Q
C
o
U
0.08
0.04
0.00
«
~
¥
! $ ? j
~ 4
~ #
#
. j
L~ f
^ i
5~~
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Year
Tampa, FL
Annual Averages:
Cadmium (PM10)
1
i
a
o
0.40
0.32
0.24
0.16
O 0.08
0.00
< * 4 *
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Year
1.0
4
o
0.6
0.4
o
O 0.2
0.0
Tampa, FL
Annual Averages:
Carbon Tetrachloride
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Year
Page 7 of 25
-------
Figure 3. Tampa, FL Annual Average Concentrations
Tampa, FL
Annual Averages:
Chloroform
0.40
0.32
m
a
3 0.24
d
.2
g 0.16
I
u o.os
0.00
T T X 1
<
" T
~
I f T
¦#
$ ^
~ 4
~ x
s i i i m
2004 2005 2006 200" 2GU& 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Year
Tampa, FL
Annual Averages:
Formaldehyde
5.0
4.0
3
3 3.0
a
o
2.0
o
o 1.0
0.0
i
{
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Year
0.020
0.016
rC*
4
a 0.012
PS
.2
g 0.008
I
u
a
c o C*"4
O
0.000
Tampa, FL
Annual Averages:
Hexavalent Chromium
2008 2009
o
2010 2011
Year
2012 2013
Tampa, FL
Annual Averages:
Lead (PM10)
5.0
I
•W
53
O
4.0
3.0
2.0
S3
U l.o
0.0
i
*
4
4
*
~ <
~
A
" T "f
J 1 } i
i i
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Year
Page 8 of 25
-------
Figure 3. Tampa, FL Annual Average Concentrations
Tampa, FL
Annual Averages:
Manganese (PM10)
6.0
iC
1
a
0
1
4.8
3.6
2.4
a
o
u 1.2
0.0
1>-
i ~
* *
^ 1 :
o
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Year
S
1
w
CS
2
1
75.0
60.0
45.0
30.0
pj
o
^ 15.0
0.0
Tampa, FL
Annual Averages:
Naphthalene
$ *
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Year
o.o
Tampa, FL
Annual Averages:
Nickel (PMjo)
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Year
Tampa, FL
Annual Averages:
Tetrachloroethylene
0.20
0.16
«CT"
t
3 0.12
a
.2
N 0.08
u
0.04
0.00
<~
i i
~ <
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Year
Page 9 of 25
-------
0.06
¦C1-
I
0.05
0.04
S3
o
0-02
S
Q 0.01
0.00
Figure 3. Tampa, FL Annual Average Concentrations
Tampa, FL
Annual Averages:
Trichloroethylene
.1
-J ~ _~ J t -J *
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 201S
Year
0.020
0.016
J3
— 0.012
a
o
0.008
o
U 0.004
0.000
Tampa, FL
Annual Averages:
Yinvl Chloride
~ 4
4~ 4
J
f
* ~ ~
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 201S
Year
Does not meet MQO
Page 10 of 25
-------
Figure 4. Tampa, FL - 3-Year Rolling Average Concentrations
2,5
Tampa, FL
3-Year Rolling Averages:
Acetaldehyde
Oij
a
a
o
•g
i
o
2,0
1,5
1,0
*
*
i
i *
0,5
0,0
-<*Jo
v, X
Years
%
' %
V/s *0,6. ^
J/r.
2.0
Tampa, FL
3-Year Rolling Averages;
Arsenic (PM10)
Olj
1.6
1,2
F 0.8
2
£
a
a
o
O 0.4
tt {
t+4
o.o
^ ^
30o6 -%> -%s <% * <0/s
Years
Page 11 of 25
-------
Figure 4. Tampa, FL - 3-Year Rolling Average Concentrations
0.80
Tampa, FL
3-Year Rolling Averages:
Benzene
0.64
* i
a
,°
S3
C
0.48
0.32
* *
********
O
0.16
0.00
^ ^ ^
v% •%> "%/ %, *-v ^ -
>/0 ~v%
Years
Tampa, FL
3-Year Rolling Averages;
Benzo(a)pyrene
Page 12 of 25
-------
Figure 4. Tampa, FL - 3-Year Rolling Average Concentrations
o.io
0,08
Tampa, FL
3-Year Rolling Averages:
Beryllium (PM10)
3 °-m
0
o
¦¦=
es
a
s
o
u
0,04
0,02
*
0.00
Years
0.15
0.12
Tampa, FL
3-Year Rolling Averages;
1,3-Butadiene
<0
3 0.09
a
o
•g
fa
s
o
U
0.06
0.03
*
i
i * * i
i i
i * *
0.00
^ ^ ^ ^ ^/Js,
"% *<%> *-(*)# *•
-------
Figure 4. Tampa, FL - 3-Year Rolling Average Concentrations
0.30
0.24
£3
¦w
a o.is
o
a
a
8
0.12
0.06
0.00
{t
Tampa, FL
3-Year Rolling Averages:
Cadmium (PM10)
* > 1
i-
?
<~ <~
V, ^ ^CL, ^A, ^ ^J-o
*°0? "<%» "°// <0/g *~°t? *%
Years
Tampa, FL
3-Year Rolling Averages:
Carbon Tetrachloride
|
«
o
15
a
a
o
o
1.0
0.8
0,6
0.4
0.2
0.0
"V, ^ ^ ^ ^/J-o
-%6.. -%(P -%9 *-Q/0 "0// ^0/j -0/
-------
Figure 4. Tampa, FL - 3-Year Rolling Average Concentrations
0.30
0.24
Tampa, FL
3-Year Rolling Averages;
Chloroform
f
w 0.18
I
'is
fcs
0.12
i i
«
o
O
0.06
0.00
20j
%/
Years
*e
Years
Page 15 of 25
-------
Figure 4. Tampa, FL - 3-Year Rolling Average Concentrations
Tampa, FL
3-Year Rolling Averages;
Hexavalent Chromium
0.025
0,020
a 0.015
•2
1
o 0.010
0.005
4
i
f
0.000
%> ¦%, " ¦%
Years
*°'0 *°*i
5.0
4.0
(T-
t
P
S3
O
•g
s
o
3.0
1.0
0.0
\ {
t
Tampa, F'L
3-Year Rolling Averages:
Lead (PM10)
i
i i
* i
^ ^//0 ^?0 ^
"%- *-°0? *~°*3 "°>
-------
Figure 4. Tampa, FL - 3-Year Rolling Average Concentrations
Tampa, FL
3-Year Rolling Averages:
Manganese (PM10)
^ ^
^7/
-»L
®0:($
'0 -°// "'V%
Years
''ft.
Tampa, FL
3-Year Rolling Averages;
Naphthalene
60,0
C 48.0
§ 36.0
¦es
re
u
S 24.0
c
U
12.0
0.0
4*
i I
T
t
«*,_ ^V,_ ^ ^ ^ 2%,
-%0
"% %/j
Years
¦%7j -%/7
%
Page 17 of 25
-------
Figure 4. Tampa, FL - 3-Year Rolling Average Concentrations
5.0
4,0
at,
B 3.0
9
0
*£3
cs
| 20
1
u
1.0
0.0
Tampa, FL
3-Year Rolling Averages;
Nickel (PM10)
T i i
* *
-JL
-5% , ^ -%
*¦% *"% *°'j "% *°*s *% '°1%
Years
0.15
Tampa, FL
3-Year Rolling Averages;
Tetrachloroethylene
0.12
a
Ti'
"0,09
C5
| 0,06
U
s
o
o
0.03
i
\
\ \ \
T
^
i
0.00
^ ^ ^/A, ^ ^'«o
^ *°0 <0'S % 2°t$ 2°t6 °J?
Years
Page 18 of 25
-------
Figure 4. Tampa, FL - 3-Year Rolling Average Concentrations
Tampa, FL
3-Year Rolling Averages:
Trichloroethylene
a
Q
•{S
ts
s
a
0.040
0,032
0.024
0,016
0.008
0.000
«?&
i
-Or,
%
Years
-v, ^ ^ x,x>cv
\
Tampa, FL
3-Year Rolling Averages:
Vinyl Chloride
0.015
0.012
i
¦g
|3
§
o
0.009
0,006
0.003
0.000
* }
K-> ""V, "'%t, "V, %>y'/0
"% ^°'/ s%
Years
Concentrations not included in Analysis
Page 19 of 25
-------
Table 6. NATTS Network Assessment: MQO#l - Completeness Percentage at Tampa, FL
Pollutant Group
Year
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Carbonyl
Acetaldehyde
98
97
100
100
98
98
100
98
98
100
90
95
92
89
98
Carbonyl
Formaldehyde
98
97
100
100
98
98
100
98
98
100
90
95
92
89
98
Chromium VI
Chromium VI
—
93
93
100
98
98
93
97
102
—
—
—
—
—
—
PAH
Benzo(a)pyrene
—
—
—
"
—
98
98
98
97
95
100
98
100
100
98
PAH
Naphthalene
—
—
—
"
—
98
98
98
97
93
100
98
100
100
98
PM10 Metals
Arsenic (PM10)
97
97
100
100
95
102
103
113
93
90
100
100
100
102
102
PM10 Metals
Beryllium (PM10)
97
97
100
100
95
103
100
107
90
93
100
100
100
102
102
PM10 Metals
Cadmium (PM10)
97
97
100
100
95
100
100
107
100
95
100
100
100
102
102
PM10 Metals
Lead (PM10)
97
97
100
100
95
100
100
107
100
95
100
100
100
102
102
PM10 Metals
Manganese (PM10)
97
97
100
100
95
100
100
100
100
95
100
100
100
102
102
PM10 Metals
Nickel (PM10)
97
97
100
100
95
100
100
100
100
95
100
100
100
102
102
voc
Benzene
95
98
95
100
98
100
126
98
98
95
97
98
98
93
98
voc
Butadiene, 1,3-
95
98
95
100
98
100
126
98
98
95
97
98
98
93
98
voc
Carbon tetrachloride
95
98
95
100
98
100
126
98
98
95
97
98
98
93
98
voc
Chloroform
95
98
95
100
98
100
126
98
98
95
97
98
98
93
98
voc
T etrachloroethylene
95
98
95
98
98
100
126
98
98
95
97
98
98
93
98
voc
T richloroethylene
92
98
95
100
98
100
126
98
98
95
97
98
98
93
98
voc
Vinyl chloride
95
98
95
100
98
100
126
98
98
95
97
98
98
93
98
A-rated: >85%
B-rated: Between 75% to 85%
Does not meet: <75%
No data available
Page 20 of 25
-------
Table 7. NATTS Network Assessment: MQO#2 - Reported Method Detection Limits (MDLs) at Tampa, FL
Pollutant
Group
Pollutant Name
Target
MDL
Units
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Carbonyl
Acetaldehyde
0.45
l-tg/m3
0.04
0.05
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.028
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.07
0.07
Carbonyl
Formaldehyde
0.98/0.08a
l-tg/m3
0.016
0.019
0.008
0.008
0.010
0.010
0.004
0.010
0.011
0.18
0.12
0.15
0.12
0.58
0.61
Chromium VI
Chromium VI
0.08
ng/m"
--
0.20
0.08
0.10
0.08
0.06
0.01
0.05
0.04
0.05
--
--
--
--
--
PAH
Benzo(a)pyrene
0.91
ng/m"
~
--
--
--
0.04
0.07
0.04
0.04
0.06
0.07
0.35
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.07
PAH
Naphthalene
29.00
ng/m"
--
--
--
--
0.009
0.008
0.010
0.004
0.005
0.008
0.008
0.008
0.065
0.004
0.004
PM10 Metals
Arsenic (PM10)
0.23
ng/m"
8.70
5.65
6.09
2.43
1.65
1.86
1.85
1.89
1.86
1.92
0.82
0.47
0.11
0.13
0.13
PM10 Metals
Beryllium (PM10)
0.42
ng/m"
0.09
0.09
0.24
0.05
0.36
0.44
0.44
0.45
0.44
0.46
0.20
0.52
0.031
0.009
0.009
PM10 Metals
Cadmium (PM10)
0.56
ng/m"
0.11
0.30
0.57
0.27
0.27
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.26
0.07
0.35
0.05
0.01
0.01
PM10 Metals
Lead (PM10)
15.0
ng/m"
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.03
0.05
0.06
0.06
0.07
0.06
0.07
0.02
0.03
0.02
0.00
0.00
PM10 Metals
Manganese (PM10)
5.0
ng/m"
0.02
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.02
PM10 Metals
Nickel (PM10)
2.1
ng/m"
1.43
0.81
2.33
0.29
0.88
0.41
0.40
0.41
0.41
0.42
0.27
0.04
0.05
0.32
0.11
voc
Benzene
0.13
l-tg/m"
0.49
0.49
0.49
0.47
0.27
0.49
0.10
0.22
0.15
0.10
0.17
0.05
0.05
0.15
0.27
voc
Butadiene, 1,3-
0.10
l-tg/m"
0.66
0.66
0.88
0.86
0.44
0.53
0.15
0.33
0.29
0.24
0.20
0.22
0.11
0.07
0.38
voc
Carbon tetrachloride
0.17
l-tg/m"
0.74
0.74
1.11
0.96
0.37
0.81
0.19
0.26
0.19
0.19
0.30
0.07
0.07
0.11
0.19
voc
Chloroform
0.50
l-tg/m"
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.24
0.12
0.17
0.06
0.07
0.05
0.03
0.07
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.08
voc
Tetrachloroethylene
0.17
l-tg/m"
0.80
0.80
0.80
1.12
0.24
0.72
0.20
0.20
0.16
0.16
0.24
0.08
0.12
0.24
0.12
voc
T richloroethylene
0.5/0.2a
l-tg/m"
0.32
0.21
0.21
0.27
0.11
0.21
0.08
0.10
0.04
0.13
0.24
0.08
0.05
0.08
0.24
voc
Vinyl chloride
0.11
l-tg/m"
0.70
0.70
0.93
0.91
0.51
0.46
0.14
0.37
0.30
0.26
0.28
0.09
0.14
0.12
0.19
A-rated: MDL to Target MDL ratio < 1
B-rated" MDL to Target MDL ratio between 1 and 2
Does Not Meet MDL to T arget MDL ratio>2
No data available
a: For the 2012 sampling year, the Target MDL for this pollutant was reduced.
Page 21 of 25
-------
Table 8. NATTS Network Assessment: MQO#3 - Bias Percent Difference at Tampa, FL
Pollutant Group
Pollutant Name
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Carbonyls
Acetaldehyde
1.0
8.9
-0.8
-1.9
24.6
-10.1
0.7
3.0
a
0.1
-4.3
a
-5.4
3.6
-8.7
Carbonyls
Formaldehyde
-0.9
0.8
-13.2
-3.2
14.4
-7.8
-2.8
-3.4
a
-0.5
-2.2
a
-19.1
-5.3
-3.7
Chromium VI
Chromium VI
--
a
a
a
a
5.6b
10.5b
a
19.5
-6.5
--
--
--
--
--
PAH
Benzo(a)pyrene
--
--
--
--
a
-1.7
-2.3
-2.1
25.2
-5.7
-16.3
-14.2
-10.5
-22.4
-14.8
PAH
Naphthalene
--
--
--
--
a
-7.7
-17.1
-13.9
21.4
25.5
0.7
-11.4
-9.5
-11.6
-20.7
PM10 Metals
Arsenic (PM10)
c
20.4
4.7
8.1
-2.8
12.5
1.0
24.7
3.1
-17.4
0.6
a
-1.8
-4.4
1.3
PM10 Metals
Beryllium (PM10)
c
13.6
7.7
18.6
0.0
37.3
3.0
-7.0
9.3
23.1
d
a
2.1
-3.4
-1.1
PM10 Metals
Cadmium (PM10)
c
11.2
1.6
4.1
1.2
24.1
0.0
-4.6
7.0
1.8
d
a
2.0
-2.0
3.1
PM10 Metals
Lead (PM10)
c
4.6
-2.6
-6.1
-11.0
-3.8
OO
00
1
0.6
16.9
-20.5
0.5
a
1.9
-4.1
-3.8
PM10 Metals
Manganese (PM10)
c
3.8
-1.4
-14.4
-27.8
4.8
-4.9
-1.1
13.8
-3.6
4.7
a
-0.3
-6.4
2.2
PM10 Metals
Nickel (PM10)
c
13.7
14.9
-8.5
2.1
12.9
7.1
-5.4
21.9
-75.7
e
a
36.0
15.2
13.6
voc
Benzene
-10.1
7.6
-6.0
-21.5
1.8
-9.1
-10.9
6.0
a
-0.5
2.1
-8.1
-4.8
-1.2
-2.9
voc
Butadiene, 1,3-
-33.6
6.9
2.4
-8.5
17.1
-6.8
29.4
3.1
a
-3.2
-3.9
-6.0
-4.7
-2.0
-7.3
voc
Carbon tetrachloride
-4.8
15.2
-6.6
-9.8
0.0
-9.6
-9.6
2.2
a
-6.3
2.6
3.3
10.5
-1.7
-8.6
voc
Chloroform
-14.8
10.5
OO
00
I
-17.6
-7.0
-13.1
-16.6
-10.8
a
-6.0
1.1
-7.8
-5.1
-0.5
-3.3
voc
T etrachloroethylene
-9.9
-2.4
-15.4
-23.7
-15.9
-11.3
-23.5
8.4
a
-2.5
0.5
-15.5
-8.6
-0.5
-4.1
voc
T richloroethylene
-7.4
-4.4
23.9
-15.3
-4.7
-10.3
-17.1
-1.3
a
3.6
3.5
-16.7
-10.2
-1.9
1.3
voc
Vinyl chloride
-23.5
-0.5
-2.8
-15.4
-11.4
-5.8
0.9
-2.1
a
-6.0
5.1
-6.4
-8.3
-6.3
-7.2
A-rated:±25%
B-rated: Between 25% to 35% or between -25% to -35%
Does not meet:>35% or <35%
No data available
-
a: No Proficiency Test samples were sent for this pollutant and year.
b: Proficiency Test results are from the National Contract Lab for EPA's School Air Toxics Monitoring Program. The %Difference was -5.55% in 2009 and 10.53% in 2010.
c: Pollutant was sampled at this site and year, but no bias data were reported.
d: The Proficiency Test sample for this pollutant was 0; the site reported a concentration as "< MDL", rather than 0. EPA accepted this result.fi applied to these.
e: Although a Proficiency Test sample was sent to the lab supporting this site and year, the results were nullified by EPA due to QA issues.
Page 22 of 25
-------
Table 9. NATTS Network Assessment: MQO#4 - Overall Method Precision %CV at Tampa, FL
Pollutant Group
Pollutant Name
Overall Method precision % CV
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Carbonyls
Acetaldehyde
15.1
2.5
13.4
37.4
4.4
2.0
3.6
2.1
4.3
4.4
1.6
—
--
7.5
6.0
Carbonyls
Formaldehyde
16.1
7.3
11.4
44.5
4.3
6.6
6.1
2.8
12.1
3.2
2.6
—
--
3.7
7.7
Chromium VI
Chromium VI
—
18.7
11.9
a
a
20.7
17.7
6.0
0.7
a
—
—
--
—
--
PAH
Benzo(a)pyrene
--
--
--
--
a
50.6
a
13.8
a
a
30.6
8.7
5.6
6.5
3.0
PAH
Naphthalene
—
—
—
—
17.0
20.8
8.0
15.3
10.7
53.9
48.4
22.8
42.4
42.6
11.2
PM10 Metals
Arsenic (PM10)
10.2
8.3
6.4
25.3
15.2
14.0
13.8
21.9
29.5
30.4
9.6
5.0
4.4
14.3
10.5
PM10 Metals
Beryllium (PM10)
13.4
12.9
a
21.6
a
a
a
a
a
8.2
a
a
a
20.2
7.7
PM10 Metals
Cadmium (PM10)
15.5
25.1
14.3
14.0
7.2
11.9
12.4
8.2
8.1
6.9
30.4
17.0
24.4
22.5
23.9
PM10 Metals
Lead (PM10)
26.3
18.4
12.6
16.0
10.4
10.1
10.3
9.8
21.2
15.9
15.1
13.5
10.5
15.7
20.9
PM10 Metals
Manganese (PM10)
9.4
10.1
11.7
14.6
10.7
13.3
7.9
10.3
7.5
11.9
9.2
13.3
5.3
11.0
6.8
PM10 Metals
Nickel (PM10)
19.4
19.4
10.3
21.7
18.1
15.2
22.3
24.5
14.3
31.6
22.7
26.0
18.7
9.6
4.6
voc
Benzene
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
voc
Butadiene, 1,3-
—
—
—
—
—
—
--
—
--
—
--
—
--
—
--
voc
Carbon tetrachloride
—
—
—
—
—
—
--
—
--
—
--
—
--
—
--
voc
Chloroform
—
—
—
—
—
—
--
—
--
—
--
—
--
—
--
voc
T etrachloroethylene
—
—
—
—
—
—
--
—
--
—
--
—
~
—
~
voc
T richloroethylene
—
—
—
—
—
—
--
—
--
—
--
—
--
—
~
voc
Vinyl chloride
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
~
--
~
A-rated:< 15% CV
B-rated: Between 15%CV to25% CV
Does Not Meet: >25% CV or did not report Precision (required in the NATTS Workplan Template since 2012)
No data available
a: Although both primary and secondary data were reported, both sets of values were less than the MDL. Thus no %CV was calculated.
Page 23 of 25
-------
Table 10. NATTS Network Assessment: MQO#4 - Analytical Precision %CV at Tampa, FL
Pollutant Group
Pollutant Name
Analytical Method precision % CV
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Carbonyls
Acetaldehyde
3.0
1.6
1.3
0.5
0.9
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
2.4
0.6
6.2
5.6
1.3
1.2
Carbonyls
Formaldehyde
3.8
0.7
0.8
0.7
1.1
0.7
0.5
0.4
1.9
1.0
1.1
15.5
10.9
0.7
1.1
Chromium VI
Chromium VI
--
--
6.2
3.6
4.9
12.3
5.0
5.1
5.1
b
--
--
--
--
--
PAH
Benzo(a)pyrene
—
—
--
--
a
4.6
2.9
6.7
a
a
a
b
b
12.0
a
PAH
Naphthalene
--
--
--
~
3.0
3.2
4.0
3.3
2.1
4.2
a
b
b
1.1
0.7
PM10 Metals
Arsenic (PM10)
--
~
~
--
--
--
--
22.4
24.9
23.5
11.3
b
3.2
3.9
4.1
PM10 Metals
Beryllium (PM10)
~
~
~
~
--
~
~
a
a
19.0
a
b
3.0
10.0
7.2
PM10 Metals
Cadmium (PM10)
--
~
~
~
~
--
~
7.9
8.4
10.8
26.2
b
16.5
17.4
16.6
PM10 Metals
Lead (PM10)
~
--
~
~
~
~
--
11.1
12.6
15.6
15.4
b
11.6
8.0
15.0
PM10 Metals
Manganese (PM10)
~
~
--
~
~
~
~
6.6
5.6
8.7
9.4
b
3.8
5.7
3.1
PM10 Metals
Nickel (PM10)
~
~
~
--
~
~
~
23.0
28.0
26.7
17.3
b
22.1
11.3
6.7
voc
Benzene
—
—
~
~
--
~
—
4.0
2.4
1.2
2.6
1.6
0.9
1.3
3.1
voc
Butadiene, 1,3-
—
—
~
~
~
--
—
21.1
7.2
7.9
5.1
11.3
6.7
9.1
5.4
voc
Carbon tetrachloride
—
—
~
~
~
~
—
0.6
5.7
2.0
2.0
1.5
1.7
1.7
2.9
voc
Chloroform
—
—
--
~
~
~
—
6.3
5.4
6.0
a
3.1
2.4
4.3
4.8
voc
T etrachloroethylene
—
—
~
--
~
~
—
20.2
8.3
0.0
a
5.6
7.4
7.3
7.4
voc
T richloroethylene
—
—
~
~
--
~
—
a
a
a
a
a
a
35.4
0.0
voc
Vinyl chloride
--
--
~
~
~
--
--
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
A-rated:< 15% CV
B-rated: Between 15%CV to25% CV
Does Not Meet: >25% CV or did not report Precision (required in the NATTS Workplan Template since 2012)
No data available
a: The primary and/or replicate value were less than the MDL, so no calculation could be made.
b: Per the NATTS Workplan template, analytical replicates were required to be reported to AQS for this sampling year
Page 24 of 25
-------
Appendix A. Equipment Inventory
Pollutant Type Year(s) Manufacturer/Model, Extraction Type, and Year
Sampling Equipment
Carbonyls
2004
ERG custom-made Model C (Year Deployed: 2004)
2005-2012
ERG custom-made Model C-4 (Year Deployed: 2004)
2013
ERG custom-made Model C-8 (Year Deployed: 2013)
2014
ERG custom-made Model C-2 (Year Deployed: 2014)
2015
ERG custom-made Model C-18 (Year Deployed: 2015)
2016
ERG custom-made Model C-3 (Year Deployed: 2016)
2017
ERG custom-made Model C-17 (Year Deployed: 2017)
2018
ERG custom-made Model C-18 (Year Deployed: 2018)
Chormium VI
2005-2010
ERG Chromium VI sampler (Year Deployed: 2005)
2011-2013
ERG Chromium VI sampler (2 units) (Year Deployed: 2008)
PAHs
2008-2012
General Metal Works GPS-1 PUF Sampler/Graesby 670 Sampler (Year Deployed: 2008)
2013
Tisch Environmental TE-1000 PUF Sampler (Year Deployed: 2013)
2014-2018
Tisch TE1000 Hi-Vol (2) (Year Deployed: 2014)
PM10 Metals
2004-2010
Andersen Hi-Volume PM10 Sampler (Year Deployed: 1992)
2011-2018
General Metal Works Model SSI PM10 Sampler (Year Deployed: 1999)
VOCs
2004-2018
Custom-built (Year Deployed: 2004)
Analytical Equipment
Carbonyls
2004-2017
Waters Alliance 2695 HPLC /model 2487 Dual Absorbance (Year Deployed: 2003)
2018
Waters Alliance e2695 HPLC /model 2489 Dual Asorbance UV/Vis (Year Deployed: 2018)
Chormium VI
2008-2013
Dionex 300 ion chromatography system (Year Deployed: 2001)
PAHs
2008-2013
HP/Agilent 5890/5971 GC/MS (Year Deployed: 2008)
2014-2018
HP/Agilent 7890B/5975C GC/MS (Year Deployed: 2014)
PM10 Metals
2004-2013
PE Optima 2000 ICP-OES (Year Deployed: 2001)
2014-2018
Perkin-Elmer NexION 300XICP-MS (Year Deployed: 2014)
VOCs
2004-2013
HP/Agilent 6890/5973 GC/MS (Year Deployed: 2001)
2014-2015
HP/Agilent 7890/5975 GC/MS (Year Deployed: 2014)
2016-2018
Agilent 7890A/5975C GC/MS (Year Deployed: 2016)
Preconcentrator Equipment
VOCs
2004-2005
Entech7100 (Dynamic Dilution) (Year Deployed: 2001)
2006-2013
Entech 7100A (Year Deployed: 2006)
2014-2018
Entech7200 (Year Deployed: 2014)
Standards Preparation Equipment
VOCs
2004-2006
Ashe roll pressure gauge (Pressure Dilution) (Year Deployed: 2003)
2007-2018
Heise Digital Gauge (dynamic dilution) (Year Deployed: 2007)
Canister Cleaning Equipment
VOCs
2004
Entech 3000 (Hot) (Year Deployed: 1997)
2005-2015
Entech 3100A (Hot) (Year Deployed: 2005)
2016-2018
Entech 3100 (Hot) (Year Deployed: 2005)
PM10 Extraction Equipment
PM10 Metals
2004-2006
Thermolyne 2200 (Hotblock) (Year Deployed: 2006)
2007-2018
SCP Digiprep (Hotblock) (Year Deployed: 2006)
Chromium VI Extraction Equipment
Chormium VI
2005-2010
Branson 8510 (Sonicator) (Year Deployed: 2001)
2011-2011
Branson 8510 Sonicator/Branson Shaker (Year Deployed: 2001/2011)
2012-2013
Branson Shaker (Year Deployed: 2011)
PAHs Extraction Equipment
PAHs 2008-2018 Dionex -300 (ASE) (Year Deployed: 2004)
Page 25 of 25
------- |