>vEPA
February 2022
United States Office of Chemical Safety and
Environmental Protection Agency Pollution Prevention
Final Scope of Risk Evaluation for
Octamethylcyclotetra- siloxane (D4)
Supplemental File:
Data Extraction and Data Evaluation Tables
for Physical and Chemical Property Studies for D4 Degradants
CH-
HO—Si OH
I
CHo
(CASRN 1066-42-8)
OH
H,C Si CH:
H3C
^Si
0 \
1 ch3
H3C Si CH3
OH
(CASRN 3663-50-1)
CH?
HO /
Si\
/ O
h3c |
H3C Si CH3
OH
(CASRN 1118-15-6)
CH,
HO /
Si
/ 0
H3C
H,C Si CH^
I ch3
°\ /
Si.
/ o
H3C |
H3C Si CH3
OH
(CASRN 3081-07-0)
February 2022
-------
Table of Contents
Dimethylsilanediol (CASRN 1066-42-8) Data Extraction Tables 6
Table 1. Physical State Study Summary 6
Table 2. Physical Properties Study Summary 6
Table 3. Melting Point Study Summary 6
Table 4. Boiling Point Study Summary 6
Table 5. Density Study Summary 6
Table 6. Vapor Pressure Study Summary 7
Table 7. Vapor Density Study Summary 7
Table 8. Water Solubility Study Summary 7
Table 9. Octanol Water Coefficient (logKow) Study Summary 7
Table 10. Henry's Law Constant Study Summary 8
Table 11. Flash Point Study Summary 8
Table 12. Auto Flammability Study Summary 8
Table 13. Viscosity Study Summary 8
Table 14. Refractive Index Study Summary 8
Table 15. Dielectric Constant Study Summary 8
EPI Suite™ Model Outputs 9
Data Evaluation Tables 12
Elsevier (2021). Reaxys: physical-chemical property data for dimethylsilanediol. CAS
Registry Number: 1066-42-8; HERO ID: 7995011 12
Elsevier (2021). Reaxys: physical-chemical property data for dimethylsilanediol. CAS
Registry Number: 1066-42-8; HERO ID: 7995011 13
Elsevier (2021). Reaxys: physical-chemical property data for dimethylsilanediol. CAS
Registry Number: 1066-42-8; HERO ID: 7995011 14
Rsc (2021). ChemSpider: Dimethylsilanediol. HERO ID: 7999339 15
Elsevier (2021). Reaxys: physical-chemical property data for dimethylsilanediol. CAS
Registry Number: 1066-42-8. HERO ID: 7995011 16
U.S.EPA (2021). Chemistry dashboard information for Dimethylsilanediol. CAS registry
number: 1066-42-8. HERO ID: 7996867 17
U.S. EPA. (2021). Chemistry dashboard information for Dimethylsilanediol. CAS registry
number: 1066-42-8; HERO ID: 7996867 18
U.S. EPA (2021). Pubchem: Dimethylsilanediol. CAS registry number: 1066-42-8. HERO
ID: 7998093 19
Xu, S. and B. Kropscott (2012). Method for simultaneous determination of partition
coefficients for cyclic volatile methylsiloxanes and dimethylsilanediol. Analytical
Chemistry 84(4): 1948-1955 21
Elsevier (2021). Reaxys: physical-chemical property data for dimethylsilanediol. CAS
Registry Number: 1066-42-8. HERO ID: 7995011 22
U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). (2012). Estimation Programs Interface
Suite™ for Microsoft® Windows, v 4.11 [Computer Program], Washington, DC. HERO
ID:2347246 23
Tetramethyldisiloxanediol (CASRN 1118-15-6) Data Extraction Tables 24
Table 1. Physical State Study Summary 24
Page 2 of 63
-------
Table 2. Physical Properties Study Summary 24
Table 3. Melting Point Study Summary 24
Table 4. Boiling Point Study Summary 24
Table 5. Density Study Summary 25
Table 6. Vapor Pressure Study Summary 25
Table 7. Vapor Density Study Summary 25
Table 8. Water Solubility Study Summary 25
Table 9. Octanol Water Coefficient (logKow) Study Summary 26
Table 10. Henry's Law Constant Study Summary 26
Table 11. Flash Point Study Summary 26
Table 12. Auto Flammability Study Summary 26
Table 13. Viscosity Study Summary 26
Table 14. Refractive Index Study Summary 26
Table 15. Dielectric Constant Study Summary 26
EPI Suite™ Model Outputs 27
Data Evaluation Tables 30
Elsevier (2021). Reaxys: physical-chemical property data for tetramethyl-l,3-disiloxanediol.
CAS Registry Number: 1118-15-6. HERO ID: 7994661 30
Elsevier (2021). Reaxys: physical-chemical property data for tetramethyl-l,3-disiloxanediol.
CAS Registry Number: 1118-15-6. HERO ID: 7994661 31
Elsevier (2021). Reaxys: physical-chemical property data for tetramethyl-l,3-disiloxanediol.
CAS Registry Number: 1118-15-6. HERO ID: 7994661 32
Haynes, W. M. (2014). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics l,l,3,3-Tetramethyl-l,3-
disiloxanediol. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press. Taylor & Francis Group. HERO ID: 7998725 33
Elsevier (2021). Reaxys: physical-chemical property data for tetramethyl-l,3-disiloxanediol.
CAS Registry Number: 1118-15-6. HERO ID: 7994661 34
Haynes, W. M. (2014). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics l,l,3,3-Tetramethyl-l,3-
disiloxanediol. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press. Taylor & Francis Group. HERO ID: 7998725 35
Elsevier (2021). Reaxys: physical-chemical property data for tetramethyl-l,3-disiloxanediol.
CAS Registry Number: 1118-15-6. HERO ID: 7994661 36
U.S. EPA (2021). Chemistry dashboard information for 1,3-Disiloxanediol, 1,1,3,3-
tetramethyl-. CAS registry number: 1118-15-6. HERO ID: 7995923 37
U.S. EPA (2021). Chemistry dashboard information for 1,3-Disiloxanediol, 1,1,3,3-
tetramethyl-. CAS registry number: 1118-15-6. HERO ID: 7995923 38
NLM (2021). Pubchem: 1,3-Disiloxanediol, 1,1,3,3-tetramethyl-. CAS registry number: 1118-
15-6 39
Elsevier (2021). Reaxys: physical-chemical property data for tetramethyl-l,3-disiloxanediol.
CAS Registry Number: 1118-15-6. HERO ID: 7994661 40
U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). (2012). Estimation Programs Interface
Suite™ for Microsoft® Windows, v 4.11 [Computer Program], Washington, DC. HERO
ID:2347246 41
Hexamethyltrisiloxanediol (CASRN 3663-50-1) Data Extraction Tables 42
Table 1. Physical State Study Summary 42
Table 2. Physical Properties Study Summary 42
Table 3. Melting Point Study Summary 42
Table 4. Boiling Point Study Summary 42
Table 5. Density Study Summary 42
Page 3 of 63
-------
Table 6. Vapor Pressure Study Summary 42
Table 7. Vapor Density Study Summary 42
Table 8. Water Solubility Study Summary 42
Table 9. Octanol Water Coefficient (logKow) Study Summary 43
Table 10. Henry's Law Constant Study Summary 43
Table 11. Flash Point Study Summary 43
Table 12. Auto Flammability Study Summary 43
Table 13. Viscosity Study Summary 43
Table 14. Refractive Index Study Summary 43
Table 15. Dielectric Constant Study Summary 43
EPI Suite™ Model Outputs 44
Data Evaluation Tables 47
Elsevier (2021). Reaxys: physical-chemical property data for 1,1,3,3,5,5-
hexamethyltrisiloxane-l,5-diol. CAS Registry Number: 3663-50-1. HERO ID: 7992314.... 47
Elsevier (2021). Reaxys: physical-chemical property data for 1,1,3,3,5,5-
hexamethyltrisiloxane-l,5-diol. CAS Registry Number: 3663-50-1. HERO ID: 7992314.... 48
Elsevier (2021). Reaxys: physical-chemical property data for 1,1,3,3,5,5-
hexamethyltrisiloxane-l,5-diol. CAS Registry Number: 3663-50-1. HERO ID: 7992314.... 49
Elsevier (2021). Reaxys: physical-chemical property data for 1,1,3,3,5,5-
hexamethyltrisiloxane-l,5-diol. CAS Registry Number: 3663-50-1. HERO ID: 7992314.... 50
U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). (2012). Estimation Programs Interface
Suite™ for Microsoft® Windows, v 4.11 [Computer Program], Washington, DC. HERO
ID:2347246 51
Octamethyltetrasiloxanediol (CASRN 3081-07-0) Data Extraction Tables 52
Table 1. Physical State Study Summary 52
Table 2. Physical Properties Study Summary 52
Table 3. Melting Point Study Summary 52
Table 4. Boiling Point Study Summary 52
Table 5. Density Study Summary 52
Table 6. Vapor Pressure Study Summary 52
Table 7. Vapor Density Study Summary 52
Table 8. Water Solubility Study Summary 53
Table 9. Octanol Water Coefficient (logKow) Study Summary 53
Table 10. Henry's Law Constant Study Summary 53
Table 11. Flash Point Study Summary 53
Table 12. Auto Flammability Study Summary 53
Table 13. Viscosity Study Summary 53
Table 14. Refractive Index Study Summary 53
Table 15. Dielectric Constant Study Summary 53
EPI Suite™ Model Outputs 54
Data Evaluation Tables 57
Elsevier (2021). Reaxys: physical-chemical property data for 1,1,3,3,5,5,7,7-
octamethyltetrasiloxane-l,7-diol. CAS Registry Number: 3081-07-0. HERO ID: 7991715 . 57
Elsevier (2021). Reaxys: physical-chemical property data for 1,1,3,3,5,5,7,7-
octamethyltetrasiloxane-l,7-diol. CAS Registry Number: 3081-07-0. HERO ID: 7991715 . 58
Page 4 of 63
-------
Elsevier (2021). Reaxys: physical-chemical property data for 1,1,3,3,5,5,7,7-
octamethyltetrasiloxane-l,7-diol. CAS Registry Number: 3081-07-0. HERO ID: 7991715 . 59
Elsevier (2021). Reaxys: physical-chemical property data for 1,1,3,3,5,5,7,7-
octamethyltetrasiloxane-l,7-diol. CAS Registry Number: 3081-07-0. HERO ID: 7991715 . 60
Elsevier (2021). Reaxys: physical-chemical property data for 1,1,3,3,5,5,7,7-
octamethyltetrasiloxane-l,7-diol. CAS Registry Number: 3081-07-0. HERO ID: 7991715 61
U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). (2012). Estimation Programs Interface
Suite™ for Microsoft® Windows, v 4.11 [Computer Program], Washington, DC. HERO
ID:2347246 62
Page 5 of 63
-------
Dimetliy 1 silanediol (CASRN 1066-42-8) Data Extraction Tables
Table 1. Physical State Study Summary
Study Type
Result
Comments
Affiliated Reference
Data Quality
Evaluation
Results
Experimental
2 values reported in Reaxys:
crystal phase - interplanar
spacing and leafs
(Elsevier. 202lc)
High
Table 2. Physical Properties Study Summary
No Physical Properties data were identified for this chemical.
Table 3. Melting Point Study Summary
Study Type
Substance
Purity
Result
Comments
Affiliated
Reference
Data Quality
Evaluation
Results
Experimental
NR
94.5-101 °C
10 values reported in Reaxys; the test substance
was dissolved in a solvent for 6 values.
Decomposition was reported at 99-100 °C.
(Elsevier. 202lc)
High
Table 4. Boiling Point Study Summary
No Boiling Point data were identified for this chemical.
Table 5. Density Study Summary
Study Type
Study
Details
Reference
Substance
Temperature
Result
Comments
Affiliated
Reference
Data Quality
Evaluation Results
Experimental
1.095-1.099 g/cm3
1 value reported
in Reaxys
(Elsevier. 2021c)
High
Experimental
0.97 g/ml.
NR
(RSC. 2021)
Medium
Page 6 of 63
-------
Table 6. Vapor Pressure Study Summary
No Vapor Pressure data were identified for this chemical.
Table 7. Vapor Density Study Summary
No Vapor Density data were identified for this chemical.
Study Type
Substance
Purity
Temperature
pH
Analytical
Method
Result
Comments
Affiliated Reference
Data Quality
Evaluation Results
Experimental
NR
25 °C
NR
2450 g/L
2 values reported in Reaxys;
temperature reported for one
value only
(Elsevier. 2021c)
High
Experimental
NR
NR
NR
11.0 M
Equivalent to 1,010,000
mg/I. based on MW 92.17
g/mol
(U.S. EPA. 2021b)
High
Experimental
NR
NR
NR
10.8 M
Equivalent to 995,000 mg/L
based on MW
92.17 g/mol
(U.S. EPA. 2021b)
High
Experimental
NR
NR
NR
10.85 M
Equivalent to
117.7 mg/I, based on MW
92.17 g/mol
(NLM. 2021b)
High
Table 9 Octanol Water Coefficient CloeKow"! Studv Summary
Study Type
Substance
Purity
Temperature
pH
Other Study Details
(Amounts of Substance
Liquid Phases)
Result
Comments
Affiliated References
Data Quality
Evaluation Results
Experimental
NR
20.1
NR
NR
-0.41 ±
0.10
1 value reported in
Reaxys
(Elsevier. 2021c) and
(Xu and Kropscott. 2012)
High
Page 7 of 63
-------
Table 10. Henry's Law Constant Study Summary
Study Type
Substance
Purity
Temperature
Result
Comments
Affiliated Reference
Data Quality
Evaluation
Results
Experimental
98.1%
radiochemical
purity
20.1 °C
-6.84
log Kaw = -6.84 ± 0.34; Air =
1 x 10 5 mg/L; W ater = 70.0 mg/L
(Xu and KroDSCOtt.
2012)
High
Table 11. Flash Point Study Summary
No Flash Point data were identified for this chemical.
Table 12. Auto Flammability Study Summary
No Autoflammability data were identified for this chemical.
Table 13. Viscosity Study Summary
No Viscosity data were identified for this chemical.
Table 14. Refractive Index Study Summary
Study Type
Apparatus
Result
Comments
Affiliated
Reference
Data Quality
Evaluation
Results
Experimental
25 °C
1.444-1.456
2 values were reported in Reaxys; 1.444-1.448
(n2) and 1.452-1.456 (nl), 589.3 nm
(Elsevier. 202 lc)
High
Table 15. Dielectric Constant Study Summary
No Dielectric Constant data were identified for this chemical.
Page 8 of 63
-------
EPI Suite1M Model Outputs
(U.S. EPA. 2012)
SMILES : [Si](0)(0)(C)C
CHEM : DIMETHYLSILANEDIOL
MOL FOR: C2 H8 02 Sil
MOL WT : 92.17
EPI SUMMARY (v4.11)
Physical Property Inputs:
Log Kow (octanol-water): -0.41
Boiling Point (°C):
Melting Point (°C):
Vapor Pressure (mm Hg):
Water Solubility (mg/L): 9.95E+005
Henry LC (atm-m3/mole):
Log Octanol-Water Partition Coef (SRC):
Log Kow (KOWWIN vl.68 estimate) = -0.41
Boiling Pt, Melting Pt, Vapor Pressure Estimations (MPBPVP vl.43):
Boiling Pt (°C): 184.32 (Adapted Stein & Brown method)
Melting Pt (°C): -18.70 (Mean or Weighted MP)
VP(mm Hg, 25 °C): 0.136 (Mean VP of Antoine & Grain methods)
VP (Pa, 25 °C): 18.1 (Mean VP of Antoine & Grain methods)
Water Solubility Estimate from Log Kow (WSKOW vl.42):
Water Solubility at 25 °C (mg/L): 2.753E+005
log Kow used: -0.41 (user entered)
no-melting pt equation used
Water Sol (Exper. database match) = 1E+006 mg/L (25 °C)
Exper. Ref: BEILSTEIN
Water Sol Estimate from Fragments:
Wat Sol (vl.01 est) = 1E+006 mg/L
ECOSAR Class Program (ECOSAR vl. 11):
Class(es) found:
Neutral Organics
Henrys Law Constant (25 °C) [HENRYWIN v3.20]:
Bond Method : 1.16E-008 atm-m3/mole (1.17E-003 Pa-m3/mole)
Group Method: Incomplete
For Henry LC Comparison Purposes:
User-Entered Henry LC: not entered
Henrys LC [via VP/WSol estimate using User-Entered or Estimated values]:
HLC: 1.658E-008 atm-m3/mole (1.680E-003 Pa-m3/mole)
VP: 0.136 mm Hg (source: MPBPVP)
WS: 9.95E+005 mg/L (source: User-Entered)
Page 9 of 63
-------
Log Octanol-Air Partition Coefficient (25 °C) [KOAWIN vl.10]:
Log Kow used: -0.41 (user entered)
Log Kaw used: -6.324 (HenryWin est)
Log Koa (KOAWIN vl.10 estimate): 5.914
Log Koa (experimental database): None
Probability of Rapid Biodegradation (BIOWIN v4.10):
Biowinl (Linear Model): 0.7037
Biowin2 (Non-Linear Model): 0.8455
Expert Survey Biodegradation Results:
Biowin3 (Ultimate Survey Model): 2.9955 (weeks)
Biowin4 (Primary Survey Model): 3.7148 (days-weeks)
MITI Biodegradation Probability:
Biowin5 (MITI Linear Model): 0.4388
Biowin6 (MITI Non-Linear Model): 0.4759
Anaerobic Biodegradation Probability:
Biowin7 (Anaerobic Linear Model): 0.6769
Ready Biodegradability Prediction: NO
Hydrocarbon Biodegradation (BioHCwin vl.01):
Structure incompatible with current estimation method!
Sorption to aerosols (25 Dec C)[AEROWIN vl.00]:
Vapor pressure (liquid/subcooled): 16 Pa (0.12 mm Hg)
Log Koa (Koawin est): 5.914
Kp (particle/gas partition coef. (m3/ug)):
Mackay model 1.88E-007
Octanol/air (Koa) model: 2.01E-007
Fraction sorbed to airborne particulates (phi):
Junge-Pankow model: 6.77E-006
Mackay model: 1.5E-005
Octanol/air (Koa) model: 1.61E-005
Atmospheric Oxidation (25 °C) [AopWin vl.92]:
Hydroxyl Radicals Reaction:
OVERALL OH Rate Constant = 7.1992 E-12 cm3/molecule-sec
Half-Life = 1.486 Days (12-hr day; 1.5E6 OH/cm3)
Half-Life = 17.829 Hrs
Ozone Reaction:
No Ozone Reaction Estimation
Fraction sorbed to airborne particulates (phi):
1.09E-005 (Junge-Pankow, Mackay avg)
1.61E-005 (Koa method)
Note: the sorbed fraction may be resistant to atmospheric oxidation
Soil Adsorption Coefficient (KOCWIN v2.00):
Koc: 43.89 L/kg (MCI method)
Log Koc: 1.642 (MCI method)
Koc: 0.4403 L/kg (Kow method)
Page 10 of 63
-------
Log Koc: -0.356 (Kow method)
Aqueous Base/Acid-Catalyzed Hydrolysis (25 °C) [HYDROWIN v2.00]:
Rate constants can NOT be estimated for this structure!
Bioaccumulation Estimates (BCFBAF v3.01):
Log BCF from regression-based method = 0.500 (BCF = 3.162 L/kg wet-wt)
Log Biotransformation Half-life (HL) = -1.4092 days (HL = 0.03897 days)
Log BCF Arnot-Gobas method (upper trophic) = -0.037 (BCF = 0.9183)
Log BAF Arnot-Gobas method (upper trophic) = -0.037 (BAF = 0.9183)
log Kow used: -0.41 (user entered)
Volatilization from Water:
Henry LC: 1.16E-008 atm-m3/mole (estimated by Bond SAR Method)
Half-Life from Model River: 4.846E+004 hours (2019 days)
Half-Life from Model Lake: 5.287E+005 hours (2.203E+004 days)
Removal in Wastewater Treatment:
Total removal: 1.85 percent
Total biodegradation: 0.09 percent
Total sludge adsorption: 1.76 percent
Total to Air: 0.00 percent
(using 10000 hr Bio P,A,S)
Level III Fugacity Model:
Mass Amount Half-Life Emissions
(percent)
(hr) (kg/hr)
Air
0.203 35.7
1000
Water
23.1 360
1000
Soil
76.6 720
1000
Sediment
0.0843 3.24E+003
0
Persistence Time: 679 hr
Page 11 of 63
-------
Data Evaluation Tables
Study
Reference:
Elsevier (2021). Rcaxvs: physical-chemical property data for dimcthylsilancdiol. CAS Registry
Number: 1066-42-8; HERO ID: 7995011
Domain
Metric
Qualitative
Determination
(/.t'., High,
Medium, Low,
Unacceptable, or
Not Rated |NRJ)
Comments
Metric
Score
Metric
Weighting
Factor
Weighted
Score
Substance
Representativeness
High
Data are measured or
estimated for the subject
chemical substance.
1
1
1
Appropriateness
NR
Rating of this factor is
not applicable to this
kind of information.
NR
NR
NR
Test
Reliability
Reliability / Unbiased
(Method Objectivity)
NR
Rating of this factor is
not applicable to this
kind of information.
NR
NR
NR
Reliability / Analytical
Method
NR
Rating of this factor is
not applicable to this
kind of information.
NR
NR
NR
Other
Databases
High
The information or data
is from a recognized data
collection/repositor y
where data are peer-
reviewed by experts in
the field, are broadly
available to the public
for review and use OR
includes references to
the original sources.
1
1
1
Models
NR
Rating of this factor is
not applicable to this
kind of information.
NR
NR
NR
Sum of scores:
2
2
2
Mid.
Medium
Low
Overall Score = Sum of
Weighted Scores/Sum
of Metric Weighting
Factors:
1
Overall
Score
(Rounded):
1
1 and 1
l .'and :
2 'and '
Overall
Quality
Level:
High
The reviewer agreed with the overall rating for the Physical State reported by this reference.
Cited reference: Hyde; Journal of the American Chemical Society; vol. 75; (1953); p. 2166
Page 12 of 63
-------
Study
Reference:
Elsevier (2021). Rcaxvs: physical-chemical property data for dimcthylsilancdiol. CAS Registry
Number: 1066-42-8; HERO ID: 7995011
Domain
Metric
Qualitative
Determination
(i.e., High,
Medium, Low,
Unacceptable, or
Not Rated NR|)
Comments
Metric
Score
Metric
Weighting
Factor
Weighted
Score
Substance
Representativeness
High
Data are measured or
estimated for the subject
chemical substance.
1
1
1
Appropriateness
High
Measured data are
consistent with the subject
chemical substance
structural features (e.g.,
presence of certain
functional groups) or other
physical/chemical
properties or behaviors.
1
1
1
Test
Reliability
Reliability / Unbiased
(Method Objectivity)
Medium
There is no indication that
the methodology for
producing the information
was biased towards a
particular product or
outcome.
2
1
2
Reliability /
Analytical Method
Medium
The analytical method is
unknown but is likely to
be appropriate based on
the data's inclusion in a
peer-reviewed/ recognized
database or other
secondary source.
2
1
2
Other
Databases
High
The information or data is
from a recognized data
collection/repositor y
where data are peer-
reviewed by experts in the
field, are broadly available
to the public for review
and use OR includes
references to the original
sources.
1
1
1
Models
NR
Rating of this factor is not
applicable to this kind of
information.
NR
NR
NR
Sum of scores:
7
5
7
Mid.
Medium
l.nu
Overall Score = Sum of
Weighted Scores/Sum of
Metric Weighting
Factors:
1.4
Overall
Score
(Rounded):
1.4
1 and 1
1 "and 2 '
2 'and '
Overall
Quality
Level:
High
The reviewer agreed with the overall rating for the Melting Point reported by this reference.
Cited references: Makarova et al. 2006; Kennan et al. 1999; Cella and Carpenter 1994; Harris 1963; Chrzczonowicz et al.
1960; Takiguchi 1959; Kantor 1953; Hyde 1953; Kantor 1953; Hyde 1953
Page 13 of 63
-------
Studv
Elsevier (2021). Rcaxvs: phvsical-chcmical property data for dimcthylsilancdiol. CAS Registry Number:
Reference:
1066-42-8; HERO ID:
7995011
Qualitative
Determination (i.e.,
Metric
Weighting
Factor
Domain
Metric
High, Medium,
Low,
Comments
Metric
Score
Weighted
Score
Unacceptable, or
Not Rated NR|)
Representativeness
High
Data are measured or
estimated for the
1
1
1
Substance
subject chemical
substance.
Appropriateness
NR
Rating of this factor is
not applicable to this
kind of information.
NR
NR
NR
Reliability /
Medium
There is no indication
2
1
2
Unbiased (Method
Objectivity)
that the methodology
for producing the
information was
biased towards a
particular product or
Test
Reliability
outcome.
Reliability /
Analytical Method
Medium
The analytical method
is unknown but is
likely to be appropriate
based on the data's
inclusion in a peer-
reviewed/recognize d
database or other
secondary source.
2
1
2
Databases
High
The information or
data is from a
recognized data
collection/repositor y
where data are peer-
1
1
1
Other
reviewed by experts in
the field, are broadly
available to the public
for review and use OR
includes references to
the original sources.
Models
NR
Rating of this factor is
not applicable to this
kind of information.
NR
NR
NR
Sum of scores:
6
4
6
Midi
Medium
l.ou
Overall Score = Sum
of Weighted
Scores/Sum of Metric
Weighting Factors:
1.5
Overall
Score
(Rounded):
1.5
1 ;n id 1 "
1 "and : ^
: ^ and ^
Overall
Quality
Level:
High
The reviewer agreed with the overall rating for the Density reported by this reference.
Cited reference: Hyde; Journal of the American Chemical Society; vol. 75; (1953); p. 2166
Page 14 of 63
-------
Study
Reference:
Rsc (2021). ChcmSpidcr: Dimcthylsilancdiol. HERO ID: 7999339
Qualitative
Determination
Metric
Weighting
Factor
Domain
Metric
(i.e., High,
Medium, Low,
Comments
Metric
Score
Weighted
Score
Unacceptable, or
Not Rated |NR|)
Substance
Representativeness
High
Data are measured or
estimated for the
subject chemical
substance.
1
1
1
Appropriateness
NR
Rating of this factor is
not applicable to this
kind of information.
NR
NR
NR
Reliability / Unbiased
Medium
There is no indication
2
1
2
(Method Objectivity)
that the methodology
for producing the
information was
biased towards a
particular product or
outcome.
Test
Reliability
Reliability /
Analytical Method
Medium
The analytical method
is unknown but is
likely to be
appropriate based on
the data's inclusion in
a peer-
reviewed/recognize d
database or other
secondary source.
2
1
2
Databases
Medium
Data is from a
publicly available
secondary source with
references to non-peer
2
1
2
Other
reviewed original
sources.
Models
NR
Rating of this factor is
not applicable to this
kind of information.
NR
NR
NR
Sum of scores:
7
4
7
Midi
Medium
I.HM
()\ erall Score = Sum
of Weighted
Scores/Sum of
Mdric Weighting
Factors:
1.75
Overall
Score
(Rounded):
1.8
1 and 1."
1 "and 2 ^
2 'and '
Overall
Quality
Level:
Medium
The reviewer agreed with the overall rating for the Density reported by this reference.
Cited reference: Alfa Aesar
Page 15 of 63
-------
Study
Elsevier (2021). Rcaxvs: phvsical-chemical property data for dimcthylsilancdiol. CAS Registry
Reference:
Number: 1066-42-8. HERO ID: 7995011
Qualitative
Domain
Metric
Determination (i.e.,
High, Medium,
Low, Unacceptable,
or Not Rated |NR|)
Comments
Metric
Score
Metric
Weighting
Factor
Weighted
Score
Representativeness
High
Data are measured or
estimated for the subject
chemical substance.
1
1
1
Appropriateness
High
Measured data are
consistent with the
1
1
1
Substance
subject chemical
substance structural
features (e.g., presence of
certain functional
groups) or other
physical/chemical
properties or behaviors.
Reliability /
Medium
There is no indication
2
1
2
Unbiased (Method
Objectivity)
that the methodology for
producing the
information was biased
Test
Reliability
towards a particular
product or outcome.
Reliability /
Analytical Method
Medium
The analytical method is
unknown but is likely to
be appropriate based on
the data's inclusion in a
peer- reviewed/recognize
d database or other
secondary source.
2
1
2
Other
Databases
High
The information or data
is from a recognized data
collection/repository
where data are peer-
reviewed by experts in
the field, are broadly
available to the public for
review and use OR
includes references to the
original sources.
1
1
1
Models
NR
Rating of this factor is
not applicable to this
kind of information.
NR
NR
NR
Sum of scores:
7
5
7
Mid.
Medium
l.ow
Overall Score = Sum of
Weighted Scores/Sum
of Metric Weighting
Factors:
1.4
Overall
Score
(Rounded):
1.4
1 and 1
1 "and : ^
2 'and '
Overall
Quality
Level:
High
The reviewer agreed with the overall rating for the Water Solubility reported by this reference.
Cited reference: Hyde; Journal of the American Chemical Society; vol. 75; (1953); p. 2166
Page 16 of 63
-------
Studv
U.S.EPA (2021). Chemistry dashboard information for Dimcthylsilancdiol. CAS registry number:
Reference:
1066-42-8. HERO ID: 7996867
Qualitative
Domain
Metric
Determination (/.e.,
High, Medium,
Low, Unacceptable,
or Not Rated |NR|)
Comments
Metric
Score
Metric
Weighting
Factor
Weighted
Score
Representativeness
High
Data are measured or
estimated for the subject
chemical substance.
1
1
1
Appropriateness
High
Measured data are
consistent with the
1
1
1
Substance
subject chemical
substance structural
features (e.g., presence of
certain functional
groups) or other
physical/chemical
properties or behaviors.
Reliability /
Medium
There is no indication
2
1
2
Unbiased (Method
Objectivity)
that the methodology for
producing the
information was biased
Test
Reliability
towards a particular
product or outcome.
Reliability /
Analytical Method
Medium
The analytical method is
unknown but is likely to
be appropriate based on
the data's inclusion in a
peer-reviewed/recognize
d database or other
secondary source.
2
1
2
Other
Databases
High
The information or data
is from a recognized data
collection/repository
where data are peer-
reviewed by experts in
the field, are broadly
available to the public for
review and use OR
includes references to the
original sources.
1
1
1
Models
NR
Rating of this factor is
not applicable to this
kind of information.
NR
NR
NR
Sum of scores:
7
5
7
Mid.
Medium
Low
Overall Score = Sum of
1.4
Overall
Score
(Rounded):
1.4
Weighted Scores/Sum
of Metric Weighting
Factors:
1 and 1
1 "and : ^
2 'and '
Overall
Quality
Level:
High
The reviewer agreed with the overall rating for the Water Solubility reported by this reference.
Cited reference: Kovdienko et. al. Molecular informatics 29.5 (2010): 394-406.
Page 17 of 63
-------
Study
Reference:
U.S. EPA. (2021). Chemistry dashboard information for Dimcthylsilancdiol. CAS registry number:
1066-42-8; HERO ID: 7996867
Domain
Metric
Qualitative
Determination
\i.e., Hi«h,
Medium, Low,
Unacceptable, or
Not rated]
Comments
Metric
Score
Metric
Weighting
Factor
Weighted
Score
Substance
Representativeness
High
Data are measured or
estimated for the subject
chemical substance.
1
1
1
Appropriateness
High
Measured data are
consistent with the subject
chemical substance
structural features (e.g.,
presence of certain
functional groups) or other
physical/chemical
properties or behaviors.
1
1
1
Test
Reliability
Reliability /
Unbiased (Method
Objectivity)
Medium
There is no indication that
the methodology for
producing the information
was biased towards a
particular product or
outcome.
2
1
2
Reliability /
Analytical Method
Medium
The analytical method is
unknown but is likely to
be appropriate based on
the data's inclusion in a
peer-reviewed/ recognized
database or other
secondary source.
2
1
2
Other
Databases
High
The information or data is
from a recognized data
collection/repository
where data are peer-
reviewed by experts in the
field, are broadly available
to the public for review
and use OR includes
references to the original
sources.
1
1
1
Models
NR
Rating of this factor is not
applicable to this kind of
information.
NR
NR
NR
Sum of scores:
7
5
7
Mid.
Medium
Low
Overall Score = Sum of
Weighted Scores/Sum of
Metric Weighting
Factors:
1.4
Overall
Score
(Rounded):
1.4
1 ;iih.I 1
1 "and : ^
2 'and '
Overall
Quality
Level:
High
The reviewer agreed with the overall rating for the Water Solubility reported by this reference.
Cited reference: Physprop
Page 18 of 63
-------
Study
Reference:
U.S. EPA (2021). Pubchcm: Dimcthylsilancdiol. CAS registry number: 1066-42-8. HERO ID: 7998093
Qualitative
Determination
Metric
Weighting
Factor
Domain
Metric
(i.e., High,
Medium, Low,
Comments
Metric
Score
Weighted
Score
Unacceptable, or
Not Rated |NR|)
Representativeness
High
Data are measured or
estimated for the subject
chemical substance.
1
1
1
Substance
Appropriateness
High
Measured data are consistent
with the subject chemical
substance structural features
(e.g., presence of certain
functional groups) or other
physical/chemical properties
or behaviors.
1
1
1
Reliability /
Medium
There is no indication that the
2
1
2
Unbiased (Method
Objectivity)
methodology for producing
the information was biased
towards a particular product
or outcome.
Test
Reliability
Reliability /
Analytical Method
Medium
The analytical method is
unknown but is likely to be
appropriate based on the
data's inclusion in a peer-
reviewed/recognize d
database or other secondary
source.
2
1
2
Databases
Medium
Data is from a publicly
available secondary source
with references to non-peer
2
1
2
Other
reviewed original sources.
Models
NR
Rating of this factor is not
applicable to this kind of
information.
NR
NR
NR
Sum of scores:
8
5
8
Midi
Medium
1 A»\X
Overall Score = Sum of
Weighted Scores/Sum of
Metric Weighting Factors:
1.6
Overall
Score
(Rounded):
1.6
1 and
1 "and : ^
: ^ and ^
Overall
High
1."
Quality
Level:
The reviewer agreed with the overall rating for the Water Solubility reported by this reference.
Cited reference: EPA DSSTox
Page 19 of 63
-------
Study
Reference:
Elsevier (2021). Rcaxvs: physical-chemical property data for dimcthylsilancdiol. CAS Registry
Number: 1066-42-8. HERO ID: 7995011
Domain
Metric
Qualitative
Determination
(/.t'., Hi«h,
Medium, Low,
Unacceptable, or
Not Rated |NR|)
Comments
Metric
Score
Metric
Weighting
Factor
Weighted
Score
Substance
Representativeness
High
Data are measured or estimated
for the subject chemical
substance.
1
1
1
Appropriateness
High
Measured data are consistent
with the subject chemical
substance structural features
(e.g., presence of certain
functional groups) or other
physical/chemical properties or
behaviors.
1
1
1
Test
Reliability
Reliability /
Unbiased (Method
Objectivity)
Medium
There is no indication that the
methodology for producing the
information was biased
towards a particular product or
outcome.
2
1
2
Reliability /
Analytical Method
Medium
The analytical method is
unknown but is likely to be
appropriate based on the data's
inclusion in a peer- reviewed/
recognized database or other
secondary source.
2
1
2
Other
Databases
High
The information or data is from
a recognized data
collection/repository where
data are peer-reviewed by
experts in the field, are broadly
available to the public for
review and use OR includes
references to the original
sources.
1
1
1
Models
NR
Rating of this factor is not
applicable to this kind of
information.
NR
NR
NR
Sum of scores:
7
5
7
1 huh
Medium
1 A»\X
Overall Score = Sum of
Weighted Scores/Sum of
Metric Weighting Factors:
1.4
Overall
Score
(Rounded):
1.4
1 and
1 "
1 ~ and
: ^ and ^
Overall
Quality
Level:
High
The reviewer agreed with the overall rating for the Octanol Water Coefficient (logKow) reported by this reference.
Cited references: Xu, Shihe; Kropscott, Bruce; Analytical Chemistry; vol. 84; nb. 4; (2012); p. 1948-1955
Page 20 of 63
-------
Study
Reference:
Xu, S. and B. Kropscott (2012). Method for simultaneous determination of partition coefficients for
cyclic volatile mcthylsiloxancs and dimcthylsilancdiol. Analytical Chemistry 84(4): 1948-1955.
HERO ID: 2188633
Qualitative
Determination
Metric
Weighting
Factor
Domain
Metric
(/.t'., Hi«h,
Medium, Low,
Comments
Metric
Score
Weighted
Score
Unacceptable, or
Not Rated [NR])
Representativeness
High
Data are measured or
estimated for the
subject chemical
substance.
1
1
1
Substance
Appropriateness
High
Measured data are
consistent with the
subject chemical
substance structural
features or other
physical/chemical
properties or
behaviors.
1
1
1
Reliability / Unbiased
(Method Objectivity)
High
The methodology for
producing the
information is
designed to answer a
specific question, and
the methodology's
objective is clear.
1
1
1
Test
Reliability
Reliability / Analytical
Method
High
Data are obtained by
accepted standard
analytical methods,
including, but not
limited to OECD
guidelines for
physical-chemical
properties or another
developed standard.
1
1
1
Databases
NR
Rating of this factor is
NR
NR
NR
Other
not applicable to this
kind of information.
Models
NR
Rating of this factor is
not applicable to this
kind of information.
NR
NR
NR
Sum of scores:
4
4
4
Midi
Medium
1 A»\X
()\ erall Score = Sum
of Weighted
Scores/Sum of Metric
Weighting Factors:
1
Overall
Score
(Rounded):
1
1 and 1
1 "and : ^
2 ' and '
Overall
Quality
Level:
High
The reviewer agreed with the overall rating for the Octanol Water Coefficient (logKow) reported by this reference.
Page 21 of 63
-------
Studv
Elsevier (2021). Rcaxvs: physical-chemical property data for dimcthylsilancdiol. CAS Registry Number:
Reference:
1066-42-8. HERO ID: 7995011
Qualitative
Determination
Metric
Weighting
Factor
Domain
Metric
(i.e., High,
Medium, Low,
Comments
Metric
Score
Weighted Score
Unacceptable, or
Not Rated |NR|)
Representativeness
High
Data are measured or
estimated for the
1
1
1
Substance
subject chemical
substance.
Appropriateness
NR
Rating of this factor is
not applicable to this
kind of information.
NR
NR
NR
Reliability /
Medium
There is no indication
2
1
2
Unbiased (Method
Objectivity)
that the methodology
for producing the
information was
biased towards a
particular product or
outcome.
Test
Reliability
Reliability /
Analytical Method
Medium
The analytical method
is unknown but is
likely to be
appropriate based on
the data's inclusion in
a peer-reviewed/
recognized database or
other secondary
source.
2
1
2
Databases
High
The information or
data is from a
recognized data
collection/repository
where data are peer-
1
1
1
Other
reviewed by experts in
the field, are broadly
available to the public
for review and use OR
includes references to
the original sources.
Models
NR
Rating of this factor is
not applicable to this
kind of information.
NR
NR
NR
Sum of scores:
6
4
6
1 huh
Medium
l.ou
Overall Score = Sum
of Weighted
Scores/Sum of Metric
Weighting Factors:
1.5
Overall
Score
(Rounded):
1.5
1 III id 1 "
1 "and : ^
: ^ and ^
Overall
Quality
Level:
High
The reviewer agreed with the overall rating for the Refractive Index reported by this reference.
Cited reference: Hyde; Journal of the American Chemical Society; vol. 75; (1953); p. 2166
Page 22 of 63
-------
Study
U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Aucncv). (2012). Estimation Programs Interface Suite
™ for
Reference:
Microsoft^; Windows, v 4.11 IComnutcr Program 1. Washington. DC. HERO ID:2347246
Qualitative
Determination (/.e.,
Metric
Score
Metric
Weighted
Score
Domain
Metric
High, Medium. Low,
Unacceptable, or Not
Rated |NR|)
Comments
Weighting
Factor
Substance
Representativeness
NR
The metric is not applicable to
this study type (SAR).
NR
1
NR
Appropriateness
NR
The metric is not applicable to
this study type (SAR).
NR
1
NR
Test
Reliability
Reliability /
Unbiased (Method
Objectivity)
NR
The metric is not applicable to
this study type (SAR).
NR
1
NR
Reliability /
Analytical Method
NR
The metric is not applicable to
this study type (SAR).
NR
1
NR
Databases
NR
The metric is not applicable to
this study type (SAR).
NR
1
NR
Models
High
The models in EPI Suite™
have defined endpoints.
Chemical domain and
performance statistics for each
model are known, and
unambiguous algorithms are
available in the EPI Suite™
documentation and/or cited
references to establish their
scientific validity. Many EPI
Suite™ models have
1
1
1
Other
correlation coefficients >0.7,
cross-validated correlation
coefficients >0.5, and
standard error values <0.3;
however, correlation
coefficients (r2, q2) for the
regressions of some
environmental fate models
(i.e., BIOWIN) are lower, as
expected, compared to
regressions which have
specific experimental values
such as water solubility or log
Kow (octanol-water partition
coefficient).
Sum of scores:
1
1
1
1 huh
Medium
1 A»\X
Overall Score = Sum of
Weighted Scores/Sum of
Metric Weighting Factors:
1
Overall
Score
(Rounded):
1
1 and 1
1 "and : '
: ^ ;md ^
Overall
Quality
Level:
High
Page 23 of 63
-------
Tetramethyldisiloxanediol (CASRN 1118-15-6) Data Extraction Tables
Table 1. Physical State Study Summary
Study Type
Result
Comments
Affiliated Reference
Data Quality Evaluation Results
Experimental
3 values reported in Reaxys: 2
values were monoclinic crystal
system (solid), 1 value was
needle crystal shape (solid)
(Elsevier. 202Id)
High
Study Type
Result
Comments
Affiliated Reference
Data Quality Evaluation Results
Experimental
1 property reported in
Reaxys: color - white
(Elsevier. 202ldi
High
Table 3. Melting Point Study Summary
Study Type
Substance
Purity
Result
Comments
Affiliated Reference
Data Quality
Evaluation Results
Experimental
NR
62-68°C
19 values were reported in Reaxys; 8 values were in the
range of 62-68 °C; one value was outside of this range; 9
values were reported with the test substance in a solvent.
(Elsevier. 202 Id)
High
Experimental
NR
66 °C
NR
(Havnes. 2014)
High
Table 4. Boiling Point Study Summary
No Boiling Point data were identified for this chemical.
Page 24 of 63
-------
Table 5. Density Study Summary
Study Type
Study
Details
Reference
Substance
Temperature
Result
Comments
Affiliated
Reference
Data Quality
Evaluation
Results
Experimental
1.08-1.15 g/cm3
4 values reported in Reaxys; 2 values were
1.118 g/cm3 at 16 °C; 2 values did not have
measurement temperatures. Crystallographic
density.
(Elsevier. 202Id)
High
Experimental
1.095 g/cm3
density at 25 °C
(Havnes. 2014)
High
Table 6. Vapor Pressure Study Summary
No Vapor Pressure data were identified for this chemical.
Table 7. Vapor Density Study Summary
No Vapor Density data were identified for this chemical.
Table 8. Water Solubility Study Summary
Study Type
Substance
Purity
Temperature
pH
Analytical
Method
Result
Comments
Affiliated
Reference
Data Quality
Evaluation Results
Experimental
NR
20-25 °C
NR
110-115 g/L
3 values reported in Reaxys,
reported as 100 g solvent
(water) dissolves 11-11.5 g
substance
(Elsevier.
202 Id)
High
Experimental
NR
NR
NR
0.662 M
Equivalent to 110,000 mg/L
based on MW
166.32 g/mol
(U.S. EPA.
2021a)
High
Experimental
NR
NR
NR
0.661 M
Equivalent to 110,000 mg/L
based on MW
166.32 g/mol
(U.S. EPA.
2021a)
High
Experimental
NR
NR
NR
0.66 M
Equivalent to 100,000 mg/L
based on MW
166.32 g/mol
(NLM. 2021a)
High
Page 25 of 63
-------
Table 9. Octanol Water Coefficient (logKow) Study Summary
No Octanol Water Coefficient (logKow) data were identified for this chemical.
Table ry's Law Constant Study Summary
No Henrys Law data were identified for this chemical.
Table 11. Flash Point Study Summary
No Flash Point data were identified for this chemical.
Table 12. Auto Flammability Study Summary
No Autoflammability data were identified for this chemical.
Table 13. Viscosity Study Summary
No Viscosity data were identified for this chemical.
Table 14. Refractive Index Study Summary
Study Type
Apparatus
Result
Comments
Affiliated
Reference
Data Quality
Evaluation
Results
Experimental
25 °C
1.457-1.466
2 values reported in Reaxvs: 1.457-1.461 (nl) and 1.462-1.466 (ml),
589.3 nni
(Elsevier. 202Id)
High
Table 15. Dielectric Constant Study Summary
No Dielectric Constant data were identified for this chemical.
Page 26 of 63
-------
EPI Suite1M Model Outputs
(U.S. EPA. 2012)
SMILES: [Si](0)(0[Si](0)(C)C)(C)C
CHEM: 1,3-Disiloxanediol, 1,1,3,3-tetramethyl-
MOL FOR: C4 H14 03 Si2
MOLWT: 166.33
EPI SUMMARY (v4.11)
Physical Property Inputs:
Log Kow (octanol-water):
Boiling Point (°C):
Melting Point (°C): 66.00
Vapor Pressure (mm Hg):
Water Solubility (mg/L): 1.1E+005
Henry LC (atm-m3/mole):
Log Octanol-Water Partition Coef (SRC):
Log Kow (KOWWIN vl.68 estimate) = 1.74
Boiling Pt, Melting Pt, Vapor Pressure Estimations (MPBPVP vl.43):
Boiling Pt (°C): 236.15 (Adapted Stein & Brown method)
Melting Pt (°C): 13.78 (Mean or Weighted MP)
VP(mm Hg, 25 °C): 0.00196 (Modified Grain method)
VP (Pa, 25 °C): 0.261 (Modified Grain method)
Subcooled liquid VP: 0.00474 mm Hg (25 °C, Mod-Grain method): 0.632 Pa (25 °C, Mod-Grain
method)
Water Solubility Estimate from Log Kow (WSKOW vl.42):
Water Solubility at 25 °C (mg/L): 914.6
log Kow used: 1.74 (estimated)
melt pt used: 66.00 °C
Water Sol (Exper. database match) = 1.1E+005 mg/L (25 °C)
Exper. Ref: BEILSTEIN
Water Sol Estimate from Fragments:
Wat Sol (vl.01 est) = 1.5402E+005 mg/L
ECOSAR Class Program (ECOSAR vl. 11):
Class(es) found:
Neutral Organics
Henrys Law Constant (25 °C) [HENRYWIN v3.20]:
Bond Method: 1.59E-008 atm-m3/mole (1.61E-003 Pa-m3/mole)
Group Method: Incomplete
For Henry LC Comparison Purposes:
User-Entered Henry LC: not entered
Henrys LC [via VP/WSol estimate using User-Entered or Estimated values]:
HLC: 3.900E-009 atm-m3/mole (3.951E-004 Pa-m3/mole)
VP: 0.00196 mm Hg (source: MPBPVP)
Page 27 of 63
-------
WS: 1.1E+005 mg/L (source: User-Entered)
Log Octanol-Air Partition Coefficient (25 °C) [KOAWIN vl.10]:
Log Kow used: 1.74 (KowWin est)
Log Kaw used: -6.187 (HenryWin est)
Log Koa (KOAWIN vl.10 estimate): 7.927
Log Koa (experimental database): None
Probability of Rapid Biodegradation (BIOWIN v4.10):
Biowinl (Linear Model): 0.6684
Biowin2 (Non-Linear Model): 0.6563
Expert Survey Biodegradation Results:
Biowin3 (Ultimate Survey Model): 2.8316 (weeks)
Biowin4 (Primary Survey Model): 3.6078 (days-weeks)
MITI Biodegradation Probability:
Biowin5 (MITI Linear Model): 0.2190
Biowin6 (MITI Non-Linear Model): 0.0999
Anaerobic Biodegradation Probability:
Biowin7 (Anaerobic Linear Model): 0.5178
Ready Biodegradability Prediction: NO
Hydrocarbon Biodegradation (BioHCwin vl.01):
Structure incompatible with current estimation method!
Sorption to aerosols (25 Dec C)[AEROWIN vl.00]:
Vapor pressure (liquid/subcooled): 0.632 Pa (0.00474 mm Hg)
Log Koa (Koawin est): 7.927
Kp (particle/gas partition coef. (m3/ug)):
Mackay model: 4.75E-006
Octanol/air (Koa) model: 2.07E-005
Fraction sorbed to airborne particulates (phi):
Junge-Pankow model: 0.000171
Mackay model: 0.00038
Octanol/air (Koa) model: 0.00166
Atmospheric Oxidation (25 °C) [AopWin vl.92]:
Hydroxyl Radicals Reaction:
OVERALL OH Rate Constant = 7.4984 E-12 cm3/molecule-sec
Half-Life = 1.426 Days (12-hr day; 1.5E6 OH/cm3)
Half-Life = 17.117Hrs
Ozone Reaction:
No Ozone Reaction Estimation
Fraction sorbed to airborne particulates (phi):
0.000276 (Junge-Pankow, Mackay avg)
0.00166 (Koa method)
Note: the sorbed fraction may be resistant to atmospheric oxidation
Soil Adsorption Coefficient (KOCWIN v2.00):
Koc: 340.7 L/kg (MCI method)
Page 28 of 63
-------
Log Koc: 2.532 (MCI method)
Koc: 32.34 L/kg (Kow method)
Log Koc: 1.510 (Kow method)
Aqueous Base/Acid-Catalyzed Hydrolysis (25 °C) [HYDROWIN v2.00]:
Rate constants can NOT be estimated for this structure!
Bioaccumulation Estimates (BCFBAF v3.01):
Log BCF from regression-based method = 0.817 (BCF = 6.562 L/kg wet-wt)
Log Biotransformation Half-life (HL) = -0.4475 days (HL = 0.3569 days)
Log BCF Arnot-Gobas method (upper trophic) = 0.795 (BCF = 6.23)
Log BAF Arnot-Gobas method (upper trophic) = 0.795 (BAF = 6.23)
log Kow used: 1.74 (estimated)
Volatilization from Water:
Henry LC: 1.59E-008 atm-m3/mole (estimated by Bond SAR Method)
Half-Life from Model River: 4.749E+004 hours (1979 days)
Half-Life from Model Lake: 5.182E+005 hours (2.159E+004 days)
Removal in Wastewater Treatment:
Total removal 2.07 percent
Total biodegradation: 0.09 percent
Total sludge adsorption: 1.97 percent
Total to Air: 0.00 percent
(using 10000 hr Bio P,A,S)
Level III Fugacity Model:
Mass Amount Half-Life Emissions
(percent)
(hr)
(kg/hr)
Air
0.246
34.2
1000
Water
17.9
360
1000
Soil
81.6
720
1000
Sediment
0.258
3.24E+003
0
Persistence Time: 722 hr
Page 29 of 63
-------
Data Evaluation Tables
Study
Reference:
Elsevier (2021). Rcaxvs: physical-chemical property data for tctramcthyl-l,3-disiloxanediol. CAS
Registry Number: 1118-15-6. HERO ID: 7994661
Domain
Metric
Qualitative
Determination
(/.t'., High,
Medium, Low,
Unacceptable, or
Not Rated NRJ)
Comments
Metric
Score
Metric
Weighting
Factor
Weighted
Score
Substance
Representativeness
High
Data are measured or estimated
for the subject chemical
substance.
1
1
1
Appropriateness
NR
Rating of this factor is not
applicable to this kind of
information.
NR
NR
NR
Test
Reliability
Reliability /
Unbiased (Method
Objectivity)
NR
Rating of this factor is not
applicable to this kind of
information.
NR
NR
NR
Reliability /
Analytical Method
NR
Rating of this factor is not
applicable to this kind of
information.
NR
NR
NR
Other
Databases
High
The information or data is from
a recognized data
collection/repository where
data are peer-reviewed by
experts in the field, are broadly
available to the public for
review and use OR includes
references to the original
sources.
1
1
1
Models
NR
Rating of this factor is not
applicable to this kind of
information.
NR
NR
NR
Sum of scores:
2
2
2
II lull
Medium
1 A»\X
Overall Score = Sum of
Weighted Scores/Sum of
Metric Weighting Factors:
1
Overall
Score
(Rounded):
1
1 and
1 "
1and
2 ^ and ^
Overall
Quality
Level:
High
The reviewer agreed with the overall rating for the Physical State reported by this reference.
Cited references: Hyde 1953; Kakudo et al. 1953; Kakudo et al 1953.
Page 30 of 63
-------
Study
Reference:
Elsevier (2021). Rcaxvs: physical-chemical property data for tctramcthyl-l,3-disiloxancdiol. CAS
Rcgistrv Number: 1118-15-6. HERO ID: 7994661
Domain
Metric
Qualitative
Determination
(/.t'., High,
Medium, Low,
Unacceptable, or
Not Rated |NR|)
Comments
Metric
Score
Metric
Weighting
Factor
Weighted
Score
Substance
Representativeness
High
Data are measured or
estimated for the
subject chemical
substance.
1
1
1
Appropriateness
NR
Rating of this factor is
not applicable to this
kind of information.
NR
NR
NR
Test
Reliability
Reliability / Unbiased
(Method Objectivity)
NR
Rating of this factor is
not applicable to this
kind of information.
NR
NR
NR
Reliability / Analytical
Method
NR
Rating of this factor is
not applicable to this
kind of information.
NR
NR
NR
Other
Databases
High
The information or data
is from a recognized
data
collection/repositor y
where data are peer-
reviewed by experts in
the field, are broadly
available to the public
for review and use OR
includes references to
the original sources.
1
1
1
Models
NR
Rating of this factor is
not applicable to this
kind of information.
NR
NR
NR
Sum of scores:
2
2
2
Midi
Medium
1 .o\\
()\ erall Score = Sum
of Weighted
Scores/Sum of Metric
Weighting Factors:
1
Overall Score
(Rounded):
1
1 and 1 "
1 "and 2 ^
2 ^ and ^
Overall
Quality
Level:
High
The reviewer agreed with the overall rating for the Physical Properties reported by this reference.
Cited reference: Lucas; Martin; Journal of the American Chemical Society; vol. 74; (1952); p. 5225, View inReaxys
Page 31 of 63
-------
Study
Reference:
Elsevier (2021). Rcaxvs: physical-chemical property data for tctramcthyl-l,3-disiloxancdiol. CAS
Rcgistrv Number: 1118-15-6. HERO ID: 7994661
Domain
Metric
Qualitative
Determination
(/.t'., High,
Medium, Low,
Unacceptable, or
Not Rated |NR|)
Comments
Metric
Score
Metric
Weighting
Factor
Weighted
Score
Substance
Representativeness
High
Data are measured or
estimated for the subject
chemical substance.
1
1
1
Appropriateness
High
Measured data are consistent
with the subject chemical
substance structural features
(e.g., presence of certain
functional groups) or other
physical/chemical properties
or behaviors.
1
1
1
Test
Reliability
Reliability /
Unbiased (Method
Objectivity)
Medium
There is no indication that
the methodology for
producing the information
was biased towards a
particular product or
outcome.
2
1
2
Reliability /
Analytical Method
Medium
The analytical method is
unknown but is likely to be
appropriate based on the
data's inclusion in a peer-
reviewed/recognized
database or other secondary
source.
2
1
2
Other
Databases
High
The information or data is
from a recognized data
collection/repository where
data are peer-reviewed by
experts in the field, are
broadly available to the
public for review and use
OR includes references to
the original sources.
1
1
1
Models
NR
Rating of this factor is not
applicable to this kind of
information.
NR
NR
NR
Sum of scores:
7
5
7
Midi
Medium
l.im
Overall Score = Sum of
Weighted Scores/Sum of
Metric Weighting Factors:
1.4
Overall
Score
(Rounded):
1.4
1 ;n id 1 "
1 "and : ^
2.' and ^
Overall
Quality
Level:
High
The reviewer agreed with the overall rating for the Melting Point reported by this reference.
Cited references: Makarova et al. 2006; Lucas 1952; Cella et al. 1994; Cypryk et al. 1993; Lickiss et al. 1993; Zachernyuk
et al. 1985; Lebedev et al. 1979; Martyakova et al. 1976; Baratova et al. 1975; Andrianov 1974; Ungurenasu 1961; Borisow
etal. 1966; Barnes 1966.
Page 32 of 63
-------
Studv
Havncs, W. M. (2014). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics l,l,3,3-Tetramcthyl-l,3-
Reference:
disiloxancdiol. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press. Tavlor & Francis Group. HERO ID: 7998725
Qualitative
Determination
Metric
Weighting
Factor
Domain
Metric
{le„ Hi«h,
Medium, Low,
Comments
Metric
Score
Weighted
Score
Unacceptable, or
Not Rated |NR|)
Representativeness
High
Data are measured or
estimated for the subject
chemical substance.
1
1
1
Appropriateness
High
Measured data are
consistent with the
1
1
1
Substance
subject chemical
substance structural
features (e.g., presence of
certain functional
groups) or other physical/
chemical properties or
behaviors.
Reliability /
Medium
There is no indication
2
1
2
Unbiased (Method
Objectivity)
that the methodology for
producing the
information was biased
Test
Reliability
towards a particular
product or outcome.
Reliability /
Analytical Method
Medium
The analytical method is
unknown but is likely to
be appropriate based on
the data's inclusion in a
peer-reviewed/
recognized database or
other secondary source.
2
1
2
Databases
High
The information or data
is from a recognized data
collection/repository
where data are peer-
1
1
1
Other
reviewed by experts in
the field, are broadly
available to the public for
review and use OR
includes references to the
original sources.
Models
NR
Rating of this factor is
not applicable to this
kind of information.
NR
NR
NR
Sum of scores:
7
5
7
Mid.
Medium
l.nu
Overall Score = Sum of
Weighted Scores/Sum
of Metric Weighting
Factors:
1.4
Overall
Score
(Rounded):
1.4
1 and 1
1 "and : ^
2 'and '
Overall
Quality
Level:
High
The reviewer agreed with the overall rating for the Melting Point reported by this reference.
Page 33 of 63
-------
Studv
Elsevier (2021). Rcaxvs: phvsical-chemical property data for tctramcthyl-l,3-disiloxancdiol. CAS
Reference:
Registry Number: 1118-15-6. HERO ID: 7994661
Qualitative
Domain
Metric
Determination (i.e.,
High, Medium,
Low, Unacceptable,
or Not Rated |NR|)
Comments
Metric
Score
Metric
Weighting
Factor
Weighted
Score
Representativeness
High
Data are measured or
estimated for the
1
1
1
Substance
subject chemical
substance.
Appropriateness
NR
Rating of this factor is
not applicable to this
kind of information.
NR
NR
NR
Reliability /
Medium
There is no indication
2
1
2
Unbiased (Method
Objectivity)
that the methodology
for producing the
information was biased
towards a particular
Test
Reliability
product or outcome.
Reliability /
Analytical Method
Medium
The analytical method
is unknown but is likely
to be appropriate based
on the data's inclusion
in a peer-reviewed/
recognized database or
other secondary source.
2
1
2
Databases
High
The information or data
is from a recognized
data collection/
1
1
1
Other
repository where data
are peer-reviewed by
experts in the field, are
broadly available to the
public for review and
use OR includes
references to the
original sources.
Models
NR
Rating of this factor is
not applicable to this
kind of information.
NR
NR
NR
Sum of scores:
6
4
6
Midi
Medium
1 A»\X
()\ erall Score = Sum
of Weighted
Scores/Sum of Metric
\\ eighting Factors:
1.5
Overall
Score
(Rounded):
1.5
1 and 1 "
1 "and 2 ^
:.^aiid ^
Overall
Quality
Level:
High
The reviewer agreed with the overall rating for the Density reported by this reference.
Cited references: Lickiss et al. 1993; Hyde 1953; Kakudo et al. 1953; Kakudo et al 1953.
Page 34 of 63
-------
Studv
Haynes, W. M. (2014). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics l,l,3,3-Tetramcthyl-l,3-
Reference:
disiloxancdiol. Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press. Tavlor & Francis Group. HERO ID: 7998725
Qualitative
Determination
Metric
Weighting
Factor
Domain
Metric
(i.e., High,
Medium, Low,
Comments
Metric
Score
Weighted
Score
Unacceptable, or
Not Rated |NR|)
Representativeness
High
Data are measured or
estimated for the
1
1
1
Substance
subject chemical
substance.
Appropriateness
NR
Rating of this factor is
not applicable to this
kind of information.
NR
NR
NR
Reliability / Unbiased
Medium
There is no indication
2
1
2
(Method Objectivity)
that the methodology
for producing the
information was biased
towards a particular
Test
Reliability
product or outcome.
Reliability / Analytical
Method
Medium
The analytical method
is unknown but is likely
to be appropriate based
on the data's inclusion
in a peer-reviewed/
recognized database or
other secondary source.
2
1
2
Databases
High
The information or data
is from a recognized
data collection/
1
1
1
Other
repository where data
are peer-reviewed by
experts in the field, are
broadly available to the
public for review and
use OR includes
references to the
original sources.
Models
NR
Rating of this factor is
not applicable to this
kind of information.
NR
NR
NR
Sum of scores:
6
4
6
Midi
Medium
I.HM
()\ erall Score = Sum
of Weighted
Scores/Sum of Metric
\\ eighting Factors:
1.5
Overall
Score
(Rounded):
1.5
1 ;iihJ 1
1 "and 2 ^
2.'Mild '
Overall
Quality
Level:
High
The reviewer agreed with the overall rating for the Density reported by this reference.
Page 35 of 63
-------
Studv
Elsevier (2021). Rcaxvs: phvsical-chemical property data for tctramcthyl-l,3-disiloxancdiol. CAS
Reference:
Rcgistrv Number: 1118-15-6. HERO ID: 7994661
Qualitative
Domain
Metric
Determination (i.e.,
High, Medium, Low,
Unacceptable, or
Not Rated |NR|)
Comments
Metric
Score
Metric
Weighting
Factor
Weighted
Score
Representativeness
High
Data are measured or
estimated for the subject
chemical substance.
1
1
1
Appropriateness
High
Measured data are
consistent with the
1
1
1
Substance
subject chemical
substance structural
features (e.g., presence of
certain functional
groups) or other physical/
chemical properties or
behaviors.
Reliability /
Medium
There is no indication
2
1
2
Unbiased (Method
Objectivity)
that the methodology for
producing the
information was biased
Test
Reliability
towards a particular
product or outcome.
Reliability /
Analytical Method
Medium
The analytical method is
unknown but is likely to
be appropriate based on
the data's inclusion in a
peer-reviewed/recognize
d database or other
secondary source.
2
1
2
Databases
High
The information or data
is from a recognized data
collection/repositor y
where data are peer-
1
1
1
Other
reviewed by experts in
the field, are broadly
available to the public for
review and use OR
includes references to the
original sources.
Models
NR
Rating of this factor is
not applicable to this
kind of information.
NR
NR
NR
Sum of scores:
7
5
7
Mid.
Medium
l.nu
Overall Score = Sum of
Weighted Scores/Sum
of Metric Weighting
Factors:
1.4
Overall
Score
(Rounded):
1.4
1 and 1
1 "and : ^
2 ' and '
Overall
Quality
Level:
High
The reviewer agreed with the overall rating for the Water Solubility reported by this reference.
Cited references: Sokolow 1959; Hyde 1953; Hyde 1953
Page 36 of 63
-------
Studv
U.S. EPA (2021). Chemistry dashboard information for 1,3-Disiloxancdiol, 1,1,3,3- tctramcthyl-. CAS
Reference:
rcgistrv number: 1118-15-6. HERO ID: 7995923
Qualitative
Domain
Metric
Determination (i.e.,
High, Medium,
Low, Unacceptable,
or Not Rated |NR|)
Comments
Metric
Score
Metric
Weighting
Factor
Weighted
Score
Representativeness
High
Data are measured or
estimated for the subject
chemical substance.
1
1
1
Appropriateness
High
Measured data are
consistent with the
1
1
1
Substance
subject chemical
substance structural
features (e.g., presence of
certain functional
groups) or other physical/
chemical properties or
behaviors.
Reliability /
Medium
There is no indication
2
1
2
Unbiased (Method
Objectivity)
that the methodology for
producing the
information was biased
Test
Reliability
towards a particular
product or outcome.
Reliability /
Analytical Method
Medium
The analytical method is
unknown but is likely to
be appropriate based on
the data's inclusion in a
peer-reviewed/
recognized database or
other secondary source.
2
1
2
Databases
High
The information or data
is from a recognized data
collection/repository
where data are peer-
1
1
1
Other
reviewed by experts in
the field, are broadly
available to the public for
review and use OR
includes references to the
original sources.
Models
NR
Rating of this factor is
not applicable to this
kind of information.
NR
NR
NR
Sum of scores:
7
5
7
Mid.
Medium
l.nu
Overall Score = Sum of
Weighted Scores/Sum
of Metric Weighting
Factors:
1.4
Overall
Score
(Rounded):
1.4
1 and 1
1 "and : ^
2 ' and '
Overall
Quality
Level:
High
The reviewer agreed with the overall rating for the Water Solubility reported by this reference.
Cited reference: Kovdienko, et. al. Molecular informatics 29.5 (2010): 394-406.
Page 37 of 63
-------
Studv
U.S. EPA (2021). Chemistry dashboard information for 1,3-Disiloxancdiol, 1,1,3,3- tetramcthyl-. CAS
Reference:
rcgistrv number: 1118-15-6. HERO ID: 7995923
Qualitative
Determination
Metric
Weighting
Factor
Domain
Metric
(/.t'., High,
Medium, Low,
Comments
Metric
Score
Weighted
Score
Unacceptable, or
Not Rated NR|)
Representativeness
High
Data are measured or
estimated for the subject
chemical substance.
1
1
1
Appropriateness
High
Measured data are
consistent with the subject
1
1
1
Substance
chemical substance
structural features (e.g.,
presence of certain
functional groups) or other
physical/chemical
properties or behaviors.
Reliability /
Medium
There is no indication that
2
1
2
Unbiased (Method
Objectivity)
the methodology for
producing the information
was biased towards a
Test
Reliability
particular product or
outcome.
Reliability /
Analytical Method
Medium
The analytical method is
unknown but is likely to be
appropriate based on the
data's inclusion in a peer-
reviewed/recognized
database or other secondary
source.
2
1
2
Databases
High
The information or data is
1
1
1
Other
from a recognized data
collection/repository where
data are peer-reviewed by
experts in the field, are
broadly available to the
public for review and use
OR includes references to
the original sources.
Models
NR
Rating of this factor is not
applicable to this kind of
information.
NR
NR
NR
Sum of scores:
7
5
7
Midi
Medium
l.im
Overall Score = Sum of
Weighted Scores/Sum of
Metric Weighting
Factors:
1.4
Overall
Score
(Rounded):
1.4
1 ;i ikI 1 "
1 "and : ^
: 'and '
Overall
Quality
Level:
High
The reviewer agreed with the overall rating for the Water Solubility reported by this reference.
Cited reference: PhysProp
Page 38 of 63
-------
Studv
NLM (2021). Pubchcm: 1,3-Disiloxancdiol, 1,1,3,3-tetramcthyl-. CAS registry number: 1118-15-6.
Reference:
HERO ID: 7997877
Qualitative
Domain
Metric
Determination (i.e.,
High, Medium,
Low, Unacceptable,
or Not Rated |NR|)
Comments
Metric
Score
Metric
Weighting
Factor
Weighted
Score
Representativeness
High
Data are measured or
estimated for the
subject chemical
substance.
1
1
1
Appropriateness
High
Measured data are
consistent with the
1
1
1
Substance
subject chemical
substance structural
features (e.g., presence
of certain functional
groups) or other
physical/chemical
properties or behaviors.
Reliability /
Medium
There is no indication
2
1
2
Unbiased (Method
Objectivity)
that the methodology
for producing the
information was biased
Test
Reliability
towards a particular
product or outcome.
Reliability /
Analytical Method
Medium
The analytical method
is unknown but is likely
to be appropriate based
on the data's inclusion
in a peer-reviewed/
recognized database or
other secondary source.
2
1
2
Databases
Medium
Data is from a publicly
available secondary
source with references
2
1
2
Other
to non-peer reviewed
original sources.
Models
NR
Rating of this factor is
not applicable to this
kind of information.
NR
NR
NR
Sum of scores:
8
5
8
Midi
Medium
1 A»\X
()\ erall Score = Sum
of Weighted
Scores/Sum of Metric
\\ eighting Factors:
1.6
Overall
Score
(Rounded):
1.6
1 and 1 "
1 "and 2 ^
:.^aiid ^
Overall
Quality
Level:
High
The reviewer agreed with the overall rating for the Water Solubility reported by this reference.
Cited reference: EPA DSSTox
Page 39 of 63
-------
Study
Reference:
Elsevier (2021). Rcaxvs: physical-chemical property data for tctramcthyl-l,3-disiloxancdiol. CAS
Registry Number: 1118-15-6. HERO ID: 7994661
Domain
Metric
Qualitative
Determination
(/.t'., High,
Medium. Low,
Unacceptable, or
Not Rated |NR|)
Comments
Metric
Score
Metric
Weighting
Factor
Weighted
Score
Substance
Representativeness
High
Data are measured or
estimated for the subject
chemical substance.
1
1
1
Appropriateness
NR
Rating of this factor is not
applicable to this kind of
information.
NR
NR
NR
Test
Reliability
Reliability / Unbiased
(Method Objectivity)
Medium
There is no indication that
the methodology for
producing the information
was biased towards a
particular product or
outcome.
2
1
2
Reliability / Analytical
Method
Medium
The analytical method is
unknown but is likely to be
appropriate based on the
data's inclusion in a peer-
reviewed/recognized
database or other secondary
source.
2
1
2
Other
Databases
High
The information or data is
from a recognized data
collection/repository where
data are peer-reviewed by
experts in the field, are
broadly available to the
public for review and use
OR includes references to
the original sources.
1
1
1
Models
NR
Rating of this factor is not
applicable to this kind of
information.
NR
NR
NR
Sum of scores:
6
4
6
Midi
Medium
I.HM
Overall Score = Sum of
Weighted Scores/Sum of
Metric Weighting
Factors:
1.5
Overall
Score
(Rounded):
1.5
1 ;iihJ 1
1 "and : ^
2 'and "
Overall
Quality
Level:
High
The reviewer agreed with the overall rating for the Refractive Index reported by this reference.
Cited reference: Hyde; Journal of the American Chemical Society; vol. 75; (1953); p. 2166, View inReaxys
Page 40 of 63
-------
Studv
U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Aucncv). (2012). Estimation Programs Interface Suite™ for
Reference:
Microsoft Windows.
v 4.11 1 Comi)uter Prouraml. Washington. DC. HERO ID:2347246
Qualitative
Determination (i.e.,
Metric
Score
Metric
Weighted
Score
Domain
Metric
High, Medium,
Low, Unacceptable,
or Not Rated |NR|)
Comments
Weighting
Factor
Substance
Representativeness
NR
The metric is not applicable
to this study type (SAR).
NR
1
NR
Appropriateness
NR
The metric is not applicable
to this study type (SAR).
NR
1
NR
Test
Reliability / Unbiased
(Method Objectivity)
NR
The metric is not applicable
to this study type (SAR).
NR
1
NR
Reliability
Reliability /
Analytical Method
NR
The metric is not applicable
to this study type (SAR).
NR
1
NR
Databases
NR
The metric is not applicable
to this study type (SAR).
NR
1
NR
Models
High
The models in EPI Suite™
have defined endpoints.
Chemical domain and
performance statistics for
each model are known, and
unambiguous algorithms are
available in the EPI Suite™
documentation and/or cited
references to establish their
scientific validity. Many EPI
Suite™ models have
1
1
1
Other
correlation coefficients >0.7,
cross-validated correlation
coefficients >0.5, and
standard error values <0.3;
however, correlation
coefficients (r2, q2) for the
regressions of some
environmental fate models
{i.e., BIOWIN) are lower, as
expected, compared to
regressions which have
specific experimental values
such as water solubility or
log Kow (octanol-water
partition coefficient).
Sum of scores:
1
1
1
Midi
Medium
1 A»\X
Overall Score = Sum of
Weighted Scores/Sum of
Metric Weighting Factors:
1
Overall
Score
(Rounded):
1
1 and 1 "
1 ~ and
: ^ mid '
Overall
Quality
Level:
High
Page 41 of 63
-------
ametliyItrisiloxaiiediol (CASRN 3663-50-1) Data Extraction Tables
Table 1. Physical State Study Summary
No Physical State data were identified for this chemical.
Table 2. Physical Properties Study Summary
No Physical Properties data were identified for this chemical.
Table 3. Melting Point Study Summary
Study Type
Substance
Purity
Result
Comments
Affiliated Reference
Data Quality
Evaluation Results
Experimental
NR
-23 to -1.9 °C
2 values were reported in Reaxys.
(Elsevier. 2021a)
High
Table 4. Boiling Point Study Summary
Study Type
Substance
Purity
Result
Comments
Affiliated
Reference
Data Quality
Evaluation Results
Experimental
NR
79-91°C
5 values were reported in Reaxys; 3 were in the range of 79-91°C at
2-3 torr; the other two were 106 °C at 6 torr and 72-74°C at 0.3 ton-
(Elsevier.
2021a)
High
Table 5. Density Study Summary
Study Type
Study
Details
Reference
Substance
Temperature
Result
Comments
Affiliated
Reference
Data Quality
Evaluation Results
Experimental
0.991 to
1.0127 g/cm3
5 values were reported in Reaxys in the
range of 0.991- 1.0127 g/cm3, at 20-25 °C
(reference temperature 4 °C)
(Elsevier.
2021a)
High
Table 6. Vapor Pressure Study Summary
No Vapor Pressure data were identified for this chemical.
Table 7. Vapor Density Study Summary
No Vapor Density data were identified for this chemical.
Table 8. Water Solubility Study Summary
No Water Solubility data were identified for this chemical.
Page 42 of 63
-------
Table 9. Octanol Water Coefficient (logKow) Study Summary
No Octanol Water Coefficient (logKow) data were identified for this chemical.
Table ry's Law Constant Study Summary
No Henrys Law data were identified for this chemical.
Table 11. Flash Point Study Summary
No Flash Point data were identified for this chemical.
Table 12. Auto Flammability Study Summary
No Autoflammability data were identified for this chemical.
Table 13. Viscosity Study Summary
No Viscosity data were identified for this chemical.
Study Type
Apparatus
Result
Comments
Affiliated Refcrcnec
Data Quality Evaluation Results
Experimental
20-25 °C
1.405-1.409
6 values were reported in Reaxys in the range of 1.405-1.409,
589 nm
(Elsevier. 2021a)
High
Table 15. Dielectric Constant Study Summary
No Dielectric Constant data were identified for this chemical.
Page 43 of 63
-------
EPI Suite1M Model Outputs
(U.S. EPA. 2012)
SMILES: [Si](0)(0[Si](0[Si](0)(C)C)(C)C)(C)C
CHEM: 1,5-Trisiloxanediol, 1,1,3,3,5,5-hexamethyl-
MOL FOR: C6 H20 04 Si3
MOL WT: 240.48
EPI SUMMARY (v4.11)
Physical Property Inputs:
Log Kow (octanol-water):
Boiling Point (°C):
Melting Point (°C):
Vapor Pressure (mm Hg):
Water Solubility (mg/L):
Henry LC (atm-m3/mole):
Log Octanol-Water Partition Coef (SRC):
Log Kow (KOWWIN vl.68 estimate) = 3.20
Boiling Pt, Melting Pt, Vapor Pressure Estimations (MPBPVP vl.43):
Boiling Pt (°C): 276.03 (Adapted Stein & Brown method)
Melting Pt (°C): 35.49 (Mean or Weighted MP)
VP(mm Hg, 25 °C): 0.000289 (Modified Grain method)
VP (Pa, 25 °C): 0.0385 (Modified Grain method)
Subcooled liquid VP: 0.000359 mm Hg (25 °C, Mod-Grain method): 0.0478 Pa (25 °C, Mod-Grain
method)
Water Solubility Estimate from Log Kow (WSKOW vl.42):
Water Solubility at 25 °C (mg/L): 20.67
log Kow used: 3.20 (estimated)
no-melting pt equation used
Water Sol Estimate from Fragments:
Wat Sol (vl.01 est) = 7163.9 mg/L
ECOSAR Class Program (ECOSAR vl. 11):
Class(es) found:
Neutral Organics
Henrys Law Constant (25 °C) [HENRYWIN v3.20]:
Bond Method: 2.18E-008 atm-m3/mole (2.21E-003 Pa-m3/mole)
Group Method: Incomplete
For Henry LC Comparison Purposes:
User-Entered Henry LC: not entered
Henrys LC [via VP/WSol estimate using User-Entered or Estimated values]:
HLC: 4.424E-006 atm-m3/mole (4.483E-001 Pa-m3/mole)
VP: 0.000289 mm Hg (source: MPBPVP)
WS: 20.7 mg/L (source: WSKOWWIN)
Page 44 of 63
-------
Log Octanol-Air Partition Coefficient (25 °C) [KOAWIN vl.10]:
Log Kow used: 3.20 (KowWin est)
Log Kaw used: -6.050 (HenryWin est)
Log Koa (KOAWIN vl.10 estimate): 9.250
Log Koa (experimental database): None
Probability of Rapid Biodegradation (BIOWIN v4.10):
Biowinl (Linear Model): 0.6331
Biowin2 (Non-Linear Model): 0.3998
Expert Survey Biodegradation Results:
Biowin3 (Ultimate Survey Model): 2.6677 (weeks-months)
Biowin4 (Primary Survey Model): 3.5008 (days-weeks)
MITI Biodegradation Probability:
Biowin5 (MITI Linear Model): -0.0008
Biowin6 (MITI Non-Linear Model): 0.0134
Anaerobic Biodegradation Probability:
Biowin7 (Anaerobic Linear Model): 0.3587
Ready Biodegradability Prediction: NO
Hydrocarbon Biodegradation (BioHCwin vl.01):
Structure incompatible with current estimation method!
Sorption to aerosols (25 °C)[AEROWIN vl.00]:
Vapor pressure (liquid/subcooled): 0.0479 Pa (0.000359 mm Hg)
Log Koa (Koawin est): 9.250
Kp (particle/gas partition coef. (m3/ug)):
Mackay model: 6.27E-005
Octanol/air (Koa) model: 0.000437
Fraction sorbed to airborne particulates (phi):
Junge-Pankow model: 0.00226
Mackay model: 0.00499
Octanol/air (Koa) model: 0.0337
Atmospheric Oxidation (25 °C) [AopWin vl.92]:
Hydroxyl Radicals Reaction:
OVERALL OH Rate Constant = 7.7976 E-12 cm3/molecule-sec
Half-Life = 1.372 Days (12-hr day; 1.5E6 OH/cm3)
Half-Life = 16.460 Hrs
Ozone Reaction:
No Ozone Reaction Estimation
Fraction sorbed to airborne particulates (phi):
0.00362 (Junge-Pankow, Mackay avg)
0.0337 (Koa method)
Note: the sorbed fraction may be resistant to atmospheric oxidation
Soil Adsorption Coefficient (KOCWIN v2.00):
Koc: 2644 L/kg (MCI method)
Log Koc: 3.422 (MCI method)
Koc: 598.2 L/kg (Kow method)
Page 45 of 63
-------
Log Koc: 2.777 (Kow method)
Aqueous Base/Acid-Catalyzed Hydrolysis (25 °C) [HYDROWIN v2.00]:
Rate constants can NOT be estimated for this structure!
Bioaccumulation Estimates (BCFBAF v3.01):
Log BCF from regression-based method = 1.777 (BCF = 59.85 L/kg wet-wt)
Log Biotransformation Half-life (HL) = 0.2998 days (HL = 1.994 days)
Log BCF Arnot-Gobas method (upper trophic) = 2.145 (BCF = 139.7)
Log BAF Arnot-Gobas method (upper trophic) = 2.145 (BAF = 139.7)
log Kow used: 3.20 (estimated)
Volatilization from Water:
Henry LC: 2.18E-008 atm-m3/mole (estimated by Bond SAR Method)
Half-Life from Model River: 4.165E+004 hours (1735 days)
Half-Life from Model Lake: 4.545E+005 hours (1.894E+004 days)
Removal in Wastewater Treatment:
Total removal 7.80 percent
Total biodegradation: 0.14 percent
Total sludge adsorption: 7.66 percent
Total to Air: 0.00 percent
(using 10000 hr Bio P,A,S)
Level III Fugacity Model:
Mass Amount Half-Life Emissions
(percent)
(hr) (kg/hr)
Air
0.134 32.9
1000
Water
12 900
1000
Soil
86 1.8E+003
1000
Sediment
1.81 8.1E+003
0
Persistence
Time: 1.7E+003 hr
Page 46 of 63
-------
bles
Stud>
Reference:
Elsevier (2021). Rcaxvs: physical-chemical property data for 1,1,3,3,5,5- hcxamcthyltrisiloxanc-l,5-diol.
CAS Rcgistrv Number: 3663-50-1. HERO ID: 7992314
Domain
Metric
Qualitative
Determination (i.e.,
High, Medium, Low,
Unacceptable, or Not
Rated NR|)
Comments
Metric
Score
Metric
Weighting
Factor
Weighted
Score
Substance
Representativeness
High
Data are measured or
estimated for the subject
chemical substance.
1
1
1
Appropriateness
High
Measured data are
consistent with the subject
chemical substance
structural features (e.g.,
presence of certain
functional groups) or other
physical/ chemical
properties or behaviors.
1
1
1
Test
Reliability
Reliability /
Unbiased (Method
Objectivity)
Medium
There is no indication that
the methodology for
producing the information
was biased towards a
particular product or
outcome.
2
1
2
Reliability /
Analytical Method
Medium
The analytical method is
unknown but is likely to be
appropriate based on the
data's inclusion in a peer-
reviewed/ recognized
database or other
secondary source.
2
1
2
Other
Databases
High
The information or data is
from a recognized data
collection/repository where
data are peer-reviewed by
experts in the field, are
broadly available to the
public for review and use
OR includes references to
the original sources.
1
1
1
Models
NR
Rating of this factor is not
applicable to this kind of
information.
NR
NR
NR
Sum of scores:
7
5
7
Midi
Medium
Low
()\ erall Score = Sum of
\\ eighted Scores/Sum of
Mel ric Weighting
l-aclors:
1.4
Overall
Score
(Rounded):
1.4
1 and 1
1 ~ and : ^
2 'and '
Overall
Quality
Level:
High
The reviewer agreed with the overall rating for the Melting Point reported by this reference.
Cited reference: Patent; Union Carbide; FR1399256; (1965); (A); Chem.Abstr.; vol. 63; nb. 16383e; (1965); Chem.Abstr.;
vol. 63; nb. 16383e; (1965); Sokolow; Zhurnal Obshchei Khimii; vol. 29; (1959); p. 258,261, 263; engl. Ausg. S. 262, 265,
266.
Page 47 of 63
-------
Study
Reference:
Elsevier (2021). Rcaxvs: physical-chemical property data for 1,1,3,3,5,5- hcxamcthyltrisiloxanc-1,5-
diol. CAS Registry Number: 3663-50-1. HERO ID: 7992314
Domain
Metric
Qualitative
Determination
(/.t'., High,
Medium, Low,
Unacceptable, or
Not Rated NR|)
Comments
Metric
Score
Metric
Weighting
Factor
Weighted
Score
Substance
Representativeness
High
Data are measured or
estimated for the subject
chemical substance.
1
1
1
Appropriateness
High
Measured data are
consistent with the subject
chemical substance
structural features (e.g.,
presence of certain
functional groups) or other
physical/chemical
properties or behaviors.
1
1
1
Test
Reliability
Reliability /
Unbiased (Method
Objectivity)
Medium
There is no indication that
the methodology for
producing the information
was biased towards a
particular product or
outcome.
2
1
2
Reliability /
Analytical Method
Medium
The analytical method is
unknown but is likely to be
appropriate based on the
data's inclusion in a peer-
reviewed/recognized
database or other secondary
source.
2
1
2
Other
Databases
High
The information or data is
from a recognized data
collection/repository where
data are peer-reviewed by
experts in the field, are
broadly available to the
public for review and use
OR includes references to
the original sources.
1
1
1
Models
NR
Rating of this factor is not
applicable to this kind of
information.
NR
NR
NR
Sum of scores:
7
5
7
Midi
Medium
1 .o\\
Overall Score = Sum of
Weighted Scores/Sum of
Metric Weighting
Factors:
1.4
Overall
Score
(Rounded):
1.4
1 ;n id 1 "
1 "and : ^
: ^ and ^
Overall
Quality
Level:
High
The reviewer agreed with the overall rating for the Boiling Point reported by this reference.
Cited references: Zachernyuk et al. 1985; Kaufman et al. 1970; Union Carbide Patent 1965; Harris 1963; Andrianov et al.
1962
Page 48 of 63
-------
Study
Reference:
Elsevier (2021). Rcaxvs: physical-chemical property data for 1,1,3,3,5,5- hcxamcthyltrisiloxanc-1,5-
diol. CAS Registry Number: 3663-50-1. HERO ID: 7992314
Domain
Metric
Qualitative
Determination (i.e.,
High, Medium,
Low, Unacceptable,
or Not Rated NR|)
Comments
Metric
Score
Metric
Weighting
Factor
Weighted
Score
Substance
Representativeness
High
Data are measured or
estimated for the
subject chemical
substance.
1
1
1
Appropriateness
NR
Rating of this factor is
not applicable to this
kind of information.
NR
NR
NR
Test
Reliability
Reliability /
Unbiased (Method
Objectivity)
Medium
There is no indication
that the methodology
for producing the
information was biased
towards a particular
product or outcome.
2
1
2
Reliability /
Analytical Method
Medium
The analytical method
is unknown but is likely
to be appropriate based
on the data's inclusion
in a peer-reviewed/
recognize d database or
other secondary source.
2
1
2
Other
Databases
High
The information or data
is from a recognized
data
collection/repository
where data are peer-
reviewed by experts in
the field, are broadly
available to the public
for review and use OR
includes references to
the original sources.
1
1
1
Models
NR
Rating of this factor is
not applicable to this
kind of information.
NR
NR
NR
Sum of scores:
6
4
6
Midi
Medium
1 A»\X
()\ erall Score = Sum
of Weighted
Scores/Sum of Metric
\\ eighting Factors:
1.5
Overall
Score
(Rounded):
1.5
1 and 1 "
1 ~ and
:.^aiid ^
Overall
Quality
Level:
High
The reviewer agreed with the overall rating for the Density reported by this reference.
Cited references: Voronkov et al. 1970; Kaufman and Karlin 1970; Union Carbide Patent 1965; Andrianov et al. 1962;
Sokolow 1959.
Page 49 of 63
-------
Study
Reference:
Elsevier (2021). Rcaxvs: physical-chemical property data for 1,1,3,3,5,5- hcxamcthyltrisiloxanc-l,5-diol.
CAS Rcgistrv Number: 3663-50-1. HERO ID: 7992314
Domain
Metric
Qualitative
Determination (i.e.,
High, Medium,
Low, Unacceptable,
or Not Rated NR|)
Comments
Metric
Score
Metric
Weighting
Factor
Weighted
Score
Substance
Representativeness
High
Data are measured or
estimated for the subject
chemical substance.
1
1
1
Appropriateness
NR
Rating of this factor is not
applicable to this kind of
information.
NR
NR
NR
Test
Reliability
Reliability / Unbiased
(Method Objectivity)
Medium
There is no indication that
the methodology for
producing the information
was biased towards a
particular product or
outcome.
2
1
2
Reliability /
Analytical Method
Medium
The analytical method is
unknown but is likely to be
appropriate based on the
data's inclusion in a peer-
reviewed/recognized
database or other secondary
source.
2
1
2
Other
Databases
High
The information or data is
from a recognized data
collection/repository where
data are peer-reviewed by
experts in the field, are
broadly available to the
public for review and use
OR includes references to
the original sources.
1
1
1
Models
NR
Rating of this factor is not
applicable to this kind of
information.
NR
NR
NR
Sum of scores:
6
4
6
1 huh
Medium
1 A»\X
Overall Score = Sum of
Weighted Scores/Sum of
Metric Weighting Factors:
1.5
Overall
Score
(Rounded):
1.5
1 and
1 "
1 "and : ^
2 ^ and ^
Overall
Quality
Level:
High
The reviewer agreed with the overall rating for the Refractive Index reported by this reference.
Cited references: Voronokov et al. 1971; Kaufman and Karlin 1970; Union Carbide Patent 1965; Harris 1963; Andrianov
1962; Sokolow 1959.
Page 50 of 63
-------
Studv
U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Aucncv). (2012). Estimation Programs Interface Suite™ for
Reference:
Microsoft^; Windows.
v 4.11 IComnutcr Program 1. Washington. DC. HERO ID:2347246
Qualitative
Determination (i.e.,
Metric
Score
Metric
Weighted
Score
Domain
Metric
High, Medium, Low,
Unacccptable, or Not
Rated |NR|)
Comments
Weighting
Factor
Substance
Representativeness
NR
The metric is not applicable
to this study type (SAR).
NR
1
NR
Appropriateness
NR
The metric is not applicable
to this study type (SAR).
NR
1
NR
Test
Reliability / Unbiased
(Method Objectivity)
NR
The metric is not applicable
to this study type (SAR).
NR
1
NR
Reliability
Reliability / Analytical
Method
NR
The metric is not applicable
to this study type (SAR).
NR
1
NR
Databases
NR
The metric is not applicable
to this study type (SAR).
NR
1
NR
Models
High
The models in EPI Suite™
have defined endpoints.
Chemical domain and
performance statistics for
each model are known, and
unambiguous algorithms are
available in the EPI Suite™
documentation and/or cited
references to establish their
scientific validity. Many
EPI Suite™ models have
correlation coefficients
1
1
1
Other
>0.7, cross-validated
correlation coefficients
>0.5, and standard error
values <0.3; however,
correlation coefficients (r2,
q2) for the regressions of
some environmental fate
models (i.e., BIO WIN) are
lower, as expected,
compared to regressions
which have specific
experimental values such as
water solubility or log Kow
(octanol-water partition
coefficient).
Sum of scores:
1
1
1
Midi
Medium
1 A»\X
Overall Score = Sum of
Weighted Scores/Sum of
Metric Weighting Factors:
1
Overall
Score
(Rounded):
1
1 and 1 "
1 "and : '
: ^ ;md ^
Overall
Quality
Level:
High
Page 51 of 63
-------
Octamethyltetrasiloxanedi \SRN 3081 -07-0) Data Extraction Tables
Table 1. Physical State Study Summary
No Physical State data were identified for this chemical.
Table 2. Physical Properties Study Summary
No Physical Properties data were identified for this chemical.
Table 3. Melting Point Study Summary
Study Type
Substance
Purity
Result
Comments
Affiliated Reference
Data Quality
Evaluation Results
Experimental
NR
-5 °C
NR
(Elsevier. 2021b)
High
Table 4. Boiling Point Study Summary
Study Type
Substance
Purity
Result
Comments
Affiliated Reference
Data Quality
Evaluation Results
Experimental
NR
97-100 °C
1 value reported in Reaxys at 2 torr
(Elsevier. 2021b)
High
Experimental
NR
86-88 °C
1 value reported in Reaxys at 0.4 ton-
(Elsevier. 2021b)
High
Table 5. Density Study Summary
Study Type
Study
Details
Reference
Substance
Temperature
Result
Comments
Affiliated
Reference
Data Quality
Evaluation
Results
Experimental
0.9881-0.9886 g/cm3
2 values reported in Reaxys;
reference temperature 4 °C,
measurement temperature 20 ° C
(Elsevier. 2021b)
High
Table 6. Vapor Pressure Study Summary
No Vapor Pressure data were identified for this chemical.
Table 7. Vapor Density Study Summary
No Vapor Density data were identified for this chemical.
Page 52 of 63
-------
Table 8. Water Solubility Study Summary
No Water Solubility data were identified for this chemical.
Table 9. Octanol Water Coefficient (logKow) Study Summary
No Octanol Water Coefficient (logKow) data were identified for this chemical.
Table ry's Law Constant Study Summary
No Henrys Law data were identified for this chemical.
Table 11. Flash Point Study Summary
No Flash Point data were identified for this chemical.
Table 12. Auto Flammability Study Summary
No Autoflammability data were identified for this chemical.
Table 13. Viscosity Study Summary
No Viscosity data were identified for this chemical.
Table 14. Refractive Index Study Summary
Study Type
Apparatus
Result
Comments
Affiliated Reference
Data Quality
Evaluation
Results
Experimental
20-25 °C
1.4054-1.4088
3 values were reported in Reaxys, 589 nm
(Elsevier. 2021b)
High
Table 15. Dielectric Constant Study Summary
No Dielectric Constant data were identified for this chemical.
Page 53 of 63
-------
EPI Suite1M Model Outputs
(U.S. EPA. 2012)
SMILES: [Si](0)(0[Si](0[Si](0[Si](0)(C)C)(C)C)(C)C)(C)C
CHEM: 1,7-Tetrasiloxanediol, 1,1,3,3,5,5,7,7-octamethyl-
MOL FOR: C8 H26 05 Si4
MOL WT: 314.64
EPI SUMMARY (v4.11)
Physical Property Inputs:
Log Kow (octanol-water):
Boiling Point (°C):
Melting Point (°C):
Vapor Pressure (mm Hg):
Water Solubility (mg/L):
Henry LC (atm-m3/mole):
Log Octanol-Water Partition Coef (SRC):
Log Kow (KOWWIN vl.68 estimate) = 4.65
Boiling Pt, Melting Pt, Vapor Pressure Estimations (MPBPVP vl.43):
Boiling Pt (°C): 306.15 (Adapted Stein & Brown method)
Melting Pt (°C): 40.55 (Mean or Weighted MP)
VP (mm Hg, 25 °C): 3.53E-005 (Modified Grain method)
VP (Pa, 25 °C): 0.0047 (Modified Grain method)
Subcooled liquid VP: 4.88E-005 mm Hg (25 °C, Mod-Grain method)
: 0.0065 Pa (25 °C, Mod-Grain method)
Water Solubility Estimate from Log Kow (WSKOW vl.42):
Water Solubility at 25 °C (mg/L): 3.017
log Kow used: 4.65 (estimated)
no-melting pt equation used
Water Sol Estimate from Fragments:
Wat Sol (vl.01 est) = 301.53 mg/L
ECOSAR Class Program (ECOSAR vl. 11):
Class(es) found:
Neutral Organics
Henrys Law Constant (25 °C) [HENRYWIN v3.20]:
Bond Method: 3.00E-008 atm-m3/mole (3.04E-003 Pa-m3/mole)
Group Method: Incomplete
For Henry LC Comparison Purposes:
User-Entered Henry LC: not entered
Henrys LC [via VP/WSol estimate using User-Entered or Estimated values]:
HLC: 4.844E-006 atm-m3/mole (4.908E-001 Pa-m3/mole)
VP: 3.53E-005 mm Hg (source: MPBPVP)
WS: 3.02 mg/L (source: WSKOWWIN)
Page 54 of 63
-------
Log Octanol-Air Partition Coefficient (25 °C) [KOAWIN vl.10]:
Log Kow used: 4.65 (KowWin est)
Log Kaw used: -5.911 (HenryWin est)
Log Koa (KOAWIN vl.10 estimate): 10.561
Log Koa (experimental database): None
Probability of Rapid Biodegradation (BIOWIN v4.10):
Biowinl (Linear Model): 0.5978
Biowin2 (Non-Linear Model): 0.1886
Expert Survey Biodegradation Results:
Biowin3 (Ultimate Survey Model): 2.5039 (weeks-months)
Biowin4 (Primary Survey Model): 3.3938 (days-weeks)
MITI Biodegradation Probability:
Biowin5 (MITI Linear Model): -0.2206
Biowin6 (MITI Non-Linear Model): 0.0017
Anaerobic Biodegradation Probability:
Biowin7 (Anaerobic Linear Model): 0.1995
Ready Biodegradability Prediction: NO
Hydrocarbon Biodegradation (BioHCwin vl.01):
Structure incompatible with current estimation method!
Sorption to aerosols (25 °C)[AEROWIN vl.00]:
Vapor pressure (liquid/subcooled): 0.00651 Pa (4.88E-005 mm Hg)
Log Koa (Koawin est): 10.561
Kp (particle/gas partition coef. (m3/ug)):
Mackay model: 0.000461
Octanol/air (Koa) model: 0.00893
Fraction sorbed to airborne particulates (phi):
Junge-Pankow model: 0.0164
Mackay model: 0.0356
Octanol/air (Koa) model: 0.417
Atmospheric Oxidation (25 °C) [AopWin vl.92]:
Hydroxyl Radicals Reaction:
OVERALL OH Rate Constant = 8.0968 E-12 cm3/molecule-sec
Half-Life = 1.321 Days (12-hr day; 1.5E6 OH/cm3)
Half-Life = 15.852 Hrs
Ozone Reaction:
No Ozone Reaction Estimation
Fraction sorbed to airborne particulates (phi):
0.026 (Junge-Pankow, Mackay avg)
0.417 (Koa method)
Note: the sorbed fraction may be resistant to atmospheric oxidation
Soil Adsorption Coefficient (KOCWIN v2.00):
Koc: 2.052E+004 L/kg (MCI method)
Log Koc: 4.312 (MCI method)
Koc: 1.085E+004 L/kg (Kow method)
Page 55 of 63
-------
Log Koc: 4.035 (Kow method)
Aqueous Base/Acid-Catalyzed Hydrolysis (25 °C) [HYDROWIN v2.00]:
Rate constants can NOT be estimated for this structure!
Bioaccumulation Estimates (BCFBAF v3.01):
Log BCF from regression-based method = 2.737 (BCF = 545.8 L/kg wet-wt)
Log Biotransformation Half-life (HL) = 1.0470 days (HL = 11.14 days)
Log BCF Arnot-Gobas method (upper trophic) = 3.344 (BCF = 2208)
Log BAF Arnot-Gobas method (upper trophic) = 3.425 (BAF = 2661)
log Kow used: 4.65 (estimated)
Volatilization from Water:
Henry LC: 3E-008 atm-m3/mole (estimated by Bond SAR Method)
Half-Life from Model River: 3.462E+004 hours (1442 days)
Half-Life from Model Lake: 3.778E+005 hours (1.574E+004 days)
Removal in Wastewater Treatment:
Total removal: 63.62 percent
Total biodegradation: 0.58 percent
Total sludge adsorption: 63.05 percent
Total to Air: 0.00 percent
(using 10000 hr Bio P,A,S)
Level III Fugacity Model:
Mass Amount Half-Life Emissions
(percent)
(hr) (kg/hr)
Air
0.157 31.7
1000
Water
0.3 900
1000
Soil
77.5 1.8E+003
1000
Sediment
12.1 8.1E+003
0
Persistence
Time: 1.84E+003 hr
Page 56 of 63
-------
Data Evaluation Tables
Study
Reference:
Elsevier (2021). Rcaxvs: physical-chemical property data for 1,1,3,3,5,5,7,7- octamcthyltctrasiloxanc-
1,7-diol. CAS Registry Number: 3081-07-0. HERO ID: 7991715
Domain
Metric
Qualitative
Determination (i.e.,
High, Medium,
Low, Unacceptable,
or Not Rated |NR|)
Comments
Metric
Score
Metric
Weighting
Factor
Weighted
Score
Substance
Representativeness
High
Data are measured or
estimated for the subject
chemical substance.
1
1
1
Appropriateness
High
Measured data are
consistent with the subject
chemical substance
structural features (e.g.,
presence of certain
functional groups) or other
physical/chemical
properties or behaviors.
1
1
1
Test
Reliability
Reliability /
Unbiased (Method
Objectivity)
Medium
There is no indication that
the methodology for
producing the information
was biased towards a
particular product or
outcome.
2
1
2
Reliability /
Analytical Method
Medium
The analytical method is
unknown but is likely to
be appropriate based on
the data's inclusion in a
peer-reviewed/
recognized database or
other secondary source.
2
1
2
Other
Databases
High
The information or data is
from a recognized data
collection/repositor y
where data are peer-
reviewed by experts in the
field, are broadly available
to the public for review
and use OR includes
references to the original
sources.
1
1
1
Models
NR
Rating of this factor is not
applicable to this kind of
information.
NR
NR
NR
Sum of scores:
7
5
7
Midi
Medium
1 ,o\\
Overall Score = Sum of
Weighted Scores/Sum of
Metric Weighting
Factors:
1.4
Overall
Score
(Rounded):
1.4
1 ;ind 1 "
1 "and : ^
2.' and ^
Overall
Quality
Level:
High
The reviewer agreed with the overall rating for the Melting Point reported by this reference.
Cited reference: Zhurnal Obshchei Khimii; vol. 29; (1959); p. 258,261, 263; engl. Ausg. S. 262, 265, 266,
Page 57 of 63
-------
Study
Reference:
Elsevier (2021). Rcaxvs: physical-chemical property data for 1,1,3,3,5,5,7,7- octamcthyltctrasiloxanc-
1,7-diol. CAS Rcgistrv Number: 3081-07-0. HERO ID: 7991715
Domain
Metric
Qualitative
Determination (i.e.,
High, Medium, Low,
Unacceptable, or Not
Rated |NR|)
Comments
Metric
Score
Metric
Weighting
Factor
Weighted
Score
Substance
Representativeness
High
Data are measured or
estimated for the subject
chemical substance.
1
1
1
Appropriateness
High
Measured data are
consistent with the subject
chemical substance
structural features (e.g.,
presence of certain
functional groups) or other
physical/chemical
properties or behaviors.
1
1
1
Test
Reliability
Reliability /
Unbiased (Method
Objectivity)
Medium
There is no indication that
the methodology for
producing the information
was biased towards a
particular product or
outcome.
2
1
2
Reliability /
Analytical Method
Medium
The analytical method is
unknown but is likely to be
appropriate based on the
data's inclusion in a peer-
reviewed/recognized
database or other secondary
source.
2
1
2
Other
Databases
High
The information or data is
from a recognized data
collection/repository where
data are peer-reviewed by
experts in the field, are
broadly available to the
public for review and use
OR includes references to
the original sources.
1
1
1
Models
NR
Rating of this factor is not
applicable to this kind of
information.
NR
NR
NR
Sum of scores:
7
5
7
Midi
Medium
l.ou
Overall Score = Sum of
Weighted Scores/Sum of
Metric Weighting Factors:
1.4
Overall
Score
(Rounded):
1.4
1 ;n id 1 "
1and
2 ^ and ^
Overall
Quality
Level:
High
The reviewer agreed with the overall rating for the Boiling Point reported by this reference.
Cited reference: Andrianov,K.A. et al.; Bulletin of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR Division of Chemical Science;
(1962); p. 2144-2146; Izvestiya Akademii Nauk SSSR, Seriya Khimicheskaya; (1962); p. 2243-2245.
Page 58 of 63
-------
Study
Reference:
Elsevier (2021). Rcaxvs: physical-chemical property data for 1,1,3,3,5,5,7,7- octamcthyltctrasiloxanc-
1,7-diol. CAS Registry Number: 3081 -07-0. HERO ID: 7991715
Domain
Metric
Qualitative
Determination (i.e.,
High, Medium, Low,
Unacceptable, or Not
Rated |NR|)
Comments
Metric
Score
Metric
Weighting
Factor
Weighted
Score
Substance
Representativeness
High
Data are measured or
estimated for the subject
chemical substance.
1
1
1
Appropriateness
High
Measured data are
consistent with the subject
chemical substance
structural features (e.g.,
presence of certain
functional groups) or other
physical/ chemical
properties or behaviors.
1
1
1
Test
Reliability
Reliability /
Unbiased (Method
Objectivity)
Medium
There is no indication that
the methodology for
producing the information
was biased towards a
particular product or
outcome.
2
1
2
Reliability /
Analytical Method
Medium
The analytical method is
unknown but is likely to be
appropriate based on the
data's inclusion in a peer-
reviewed/ recognized
database or other secondary
source.
2
1
2
Other
Databases
High
The information or data is
from a recognized data
collection/repository where
data are peer-reviewed by
experts in the field, are
broadly available to the
public for review and use
OR includes references to
the original sources.
1
1
1
Models
NR
Rating of this factor is not
applicable to this kind of
information.
NR
NR
NR
Sum of scores:
7
5
7
Midi
Medium
l.ou
Overall Score = Sum of
Weighted Scores/Sum of
Metric Weighting Factors:
1.4
Overall
Score
(Rounded):
1.4
1 ;n id 1 "
1 "and : ^
:.^ind '
Overall
Quality
Level:
High
The reviewer agreed with the overall rating for the Boiling Point reported by this reference.
Cited reference: Harris; Journal of the Chemical Society; (1963); p. 5978, 5981.
Page 59 of 63
-------
Study
Reference:
Elsevier (2021). Rcaxvs: physical-chemical property data for 1,1,3,3,5,5,7,7- octamcthyltctrasiloxanc-
1,7-diol. CAS Rcmstrv Number: 3081-07-0. HERO ID: 7991715
Domain
Metric
Qualitative
Determination
(/.t'., High,
Medium, Low,
Unacceptable, or
Not Rated NR|)
Comments
Metric
Score
Metric
Weighting
Factor
Weighted
Score
Substance
Representativeness
High
Data are measured or
estimated for the subject
chemical substance.
1
1
1
Appropriateness
NR
Rating of this factor is not
applicable to this kind of
information.
NR
NR
NR
Test
Reliability
Reliability /
Unbiased (Method
Objectivity)
Medium
There is no indication that
the methodology for
producing the information
was biased towards a
particular product or
outcome.
2
1
2
Reliability /
Analytical Method
Medium
The analytical method is
unknown but is likely to be
appropriate based on the
data's inclusion in a peer-
reviewed/ recognized
database or other secondary
source.
2
1
2
Other
Databases
High
The information or data is
from a recognized data
collection/repository where
data are peer-reviewed by
experts in the field, are
broadly available to the
public for review and use
OR includes references to
the original sources.
1
1
1
Models
NR
Rating of this factor is not
applicable to this kind of
information.
NR
NR
NR
Sum of scores:
6
4
6
Midi
Medium
1 A»\X
0\erall Score = Sum of
\\ eighted Scores/Sum of
Medic Weighting Factors:
1.5
Overall
Score
(Rounded):
1.5
1 and 1 "
1 "and : ^
: ^ and ^
Overall
Quality
Level:
High
The reviewer agreed with the overall rating for the Density reported by this reference.
Cited references: Andrianov,K.A. et al.; Bulletin of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR Division of Chemical Science;
(1962); p. 2144-2146; Sokolow; Zhurnal Obshchei Khimii; vol. 29; (1959); p. 258,261, 263; engl. Ausg. S. 262, 265, 266
Page 60 of 63
-------
Study
Reference:
Elsevier (2021). Rcaxvs: physical-chemical property data for 1,1,3,3,5,5,7,7- octamcthyltctrasiloxanc-
1,7-diol. CAS Rcgistrv Number: 3081-07-0. HERO ID: 7991715
Domain
Metric
Qualitative
Determination
(i.e., Hi«h,
Medium, Low,
Unacceptable, or
Not Rated |NR|)
Comments
Metric
Score
Metric
Weighting
Factor
Weighted
Score
Substance
Representativeness
High
Data are measured or estimated
for the subject chemical
substance.
1
1
1
Appropriateness
NR
Rating of this factor is not
applicable to this kind of
information.
NR
NR
NR
Test
Reliability
Reliability /
Unbiased (Method
Objectivity)
Medium
There is no indication that the
methodology for producing the
information was biased towards
a particular product or
outcome.
2
1
2
Reliability /
Analytical Method
Medium
The analytical method is
unknown but is likely to be
appropriate based on the data's
inclusion in a peer-reviewed/
recognized database or other
secondary source.
2
1
2
Other
Databases
High
The information or data is from
a recognized data
collection/repository where
data are peer-reviewed by
experts in the field, are broadly
available to the public for
review and use OR includes
references to the original
sources.
1
1
1
Models
NR
Rating of this factor is not
applicable to this kind of
information.
NR
NR
NR
Sum of scores:
6
4
6
Midi
Medium
1 A»\X
Overall Score = Sum of
Weighted Scores/Sum of
Metric Weighting Factors:
1.5
Overall
Score
(Rounded):
1.5
1 and
1 "
1 ~ and
: ^ and ^
Overall
Quality
Level:
High
The reviewer agreed with the overall rating for the Refractive Index reported by this reference.
Cited references: Harris 1963; Andrianov,K.A. et al.; Bulletin of the Academy of Sciences of the
USSR Division of Chemical Science; (1962); p. 2144 - 2146; Sokolow; Zhurnal Obshchei Khimii; vol. 29; (1959); p.
258,261, 263; engl. Ausg. S. 262, 265, 266
Page 61 of 63
-------
Studv
U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Aucncv). (2012). Estimation Programs Interface Suite™ for
Reference:
MicrosoftX Windows,
v 4.11 [Computer Program]. Washington, DC. HERO ID:2347246
Domain
Metric
Qualitative
Comments
Metric
Metric
Weighted
Determination
Score
Weighting
Score
(/.t'., High,
Factor
Medium. Low,
Unacceptable, or
Not Rated |NR|)
Substance
Representativeness
NR
The metric is not applicable
to this study type (SAR).
NR
1
NR
Appropriateness
NR
The metric is not applicable
to this study type (SAR).
NR
1
NR
Test
Reliability / Unbiased
(Method Objectivity)
NR
The metric is not applicable
to this study type (SAR).
NR
1
NR
Reliability
Reliability /
Analytical Method
NR
The metric is not applicable
to this study type (SAR).
NR
1
NR
Databases
NR
The metric is not applicable
to this study type (SAR).
NR
1
NR
Models
High
The models in EPI Suite™
have defined endpoints.
Chemical domain and
performance statistics for
each model are known, and
unambiguous algorithms are
available in the EPI Suite™
documentation and/or cited
references to establish their
scientific validity. Many EPI
Suite™ models have
1
1
1
Other
correlation coefficients >0.7,
cross-validated correlation
coefficients >0.5, and
standard error values <0.3;
however, correlation
coefficients (r2, q2) for the
regressions of some
environmental fate models
(i.e., BIO WIN) are lower, as
expected, compared to
regressions which have
specific experimental values
such as water solubility or
log Kow (octanol-water
partition coefficient).
Sum of scores:
1
1
1
1 1 lull
Malmm
1 ,o\\
Overall Score = Sum of
Weighted Scores/Sum of
Metric Weighting Factors:
1
Overall
Score
(Rounded):
1
1 and 1."
1 ~and : ^
1 ^ ;md ^
Overall
Quality
Level:
High
Page 62 of 63
-------
References
Elsevier. (2021a). Reaxys: physical-chemical property data for l,l,3,3,5,5-hexamethyltrisiloxane-l,5-
diol. CAS Registry Number: 3663-50-1. Available online at
https://heronet.epa.gov/heronet/index.cfm/reference/download/reference id/7992314C3 - 2976
Elsevier. (2021b). Reaxys: physical-chemical property data for 1,1,3,3,5,5,7,7-octamethyltetrasiloxane-
1,7-diol. CAS Registry Number: 3081-07-0. Available online at
https://heronet.epa.gov/heronet/index.cfm/reference/download/reference id/7991715C3 - 2976
Elsevier. (2021c). Reaxys: physical-chemical property data for dimethylsilanediol. CAS Registry
Number: 1066-42-8. Available online at
https://heronet.epa.gov/heronet/index.cfm/reference/download/reference id/7995011C3 - 2976
Elsevier. (2021d). Reaxys: physical-chemical property data for tetramethyl-l,3-disiloxanediol. CAS
Registry Number: 1118-15-6. Available online at
https://heronet.epa.gov/heronet/index.cfm/reference/download/reference id/7994661C3 - 2976
Haynes, WM, (Ed.). (2014). l,l,3,3-Tetramethyl-l,3-disiloxanediol. In CRC Handbook of Chemistry
and Physics. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. Taylor & Francis Group.
https://heronet.epa.gov/heronet/index.cfm/reference/download/reference id/7998725C3 -
2819,2976
NLM (National Library of Medicine). (2021a). Pubchem: 1,3-Disiloxanediol, 1,1,3,3-tetramethyl-. CAS
registry number: 1118-15-6. Available online at
https://heronet.epa.gov/heronet/index.cfm/reference/download/reference id/7997877C3 - 2976
NLM (National Library of Medicine). (2021b). Pubchem: Dimethylsilanediol. CAS registry number:
1066-42-8. Available online at
https://heronet.epa.gov/heronet/index.cfm/reference/download/reference id/7998093C3 - 2976
RSC (Royal Society of Chemistry). (2021). ChemSpider: Dimethylsilanediol. Available online at
https://heronet.epa.gov/heronet/index.cfm/reference/download/reference id/7999339C3 - 2976
(accessed April 27, 2021).
U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). (2012). Estimation Programs Interface Suite™ for
Microsoft® Windows, v 4.11 [Computer Program], Washington, DC. Retrieved from
https://www.epa.gov/tsca-screening-tools/epi-suitetm-estimation-program-interface
U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). (2021a). Chemistry dashboard information for 1,3-
Disiloxanediol, 1,1,3,3-tetramethyl-. CAS registry number: 1118-15-6. Available online at
https://heronet.epa.gov/heronet/index.cfm/reference/download/reference id/7995923C3 - 2976
U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). (2021b). Chemistry dashboard information for
Dimethylsilanediol. CAS registry number: 1066-42-8. Available online at
https://heronet.epa.gov/heronet/index.cfm/reference/download/reference id/7996867C3 - 2976
Xu. S: Kropscott B. (2012). Method for simultaneous determination of partition coefficients for cyclic
volatile methylsiloxanes and dimethylsilanediol. Anal Chem 84: 1948-1955.
https://heronet.epa.gov/heronet/index.cfm/reference/download/reference id/2188633C3 -
384,2932,2976
Page 63 of 63
------- |