Community Grants
Program
FY 2023 FINAL IMPLEMENTATION GUIDANCE
APRIL 2023
-------
Contents
Purpose 2
Background 2
Eligibility 2
Technical Corrections 2
Cost Share Requirements 3
Waivers to Cost Share Requirements 5
Grant Administration: Community Grants Lifecycle 8
Regulations and Requirements 11
Appendix A: Statutory Language 17
Appendix B: List of EPA Congressionally Directed Spending Community Projects and
Funding Levels 19
Appendix C: Technical Corrections-Procedural Information 69
Appendix D: Application Forms and Attachments 71
Appendix E: Community Grants Workplan Contents/Outline 76
Appendix F: Grant Policies and Resources 78
1 | Page
-------
Purpose
This document provides information and guidelines on how the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) will award and administer water infrastructure projects identified as
Congressionally Directed Spending (CDS) and Community Project Funding (CPF) items in
Appropriations Acts. For Fiscal Year (FY) 2023, the Consolidated Appropriations Act (P.L. 117-
328) includes $1,472,364,541 in the State and Tribal Assistance Grants (STAG) account for 715
drinking water, wastewater, stormwater infrastructure, and water quality protection projects.1
Background
President Biden signed the FY 2023 Consolidated Appropriations Act (P.L. 117-328) into law on
December 29, 2022. In this law, Congress continued the practice of funding specifically named
community infrastructure projects, referred to by the Senate as CDS items and in the House of
Representatives as CPF items. Appendix A of this document provides the pertinent section of
the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, also referred to as the EPA's FY 2023
Appropriations Act. Water infrastructure CDS/CPF projects are further referred to as
Community Grants projects in this document.
Eligibility
Community Grants projects are designated for the planning, design, and construction of drinking
water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure and for water quality protection. Eligible
Community Grant projects are included in Appropriations Acts. For FY 2023, eligible projects
are referenced in the explanatory statement found in Appendix A. Appendix B lists each project
that is eligible for funding under the FY 2023 Appropriations Act and identifies the state,
recipient name, purpose, and appropriated funding amount of each project. EPA will use the
Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) and Drinking Water State Revolving Fund
(DWSRF) framework to guide implementation of these Community Grants; the CWSRF and
DWSRF eligibilities should be referred to for development of workplans, project scopes, costs,
and sub-awards. Funds appropriated for Community Grants projects may not be awarded solely
to repay loans received from SRF programs or to repay other debts unless there are explicit
instructions to do so in Appropriations Acts or accompanying explanatory statements and/or
committee reports. These funds may not be used for operation and maintenance.
Technical Corrections
Should a Community Grant recipient identified in an Appropriations Act need to modify the
type, purpose, or named recipient of the Community Grant, a technical correction will be needed.
The Agency's FY 2006 Appropriations Act (P.L. 109-54) included a permanent authority that
allows EPA to make technical corrections to Community Grants only after consultation with
Congress, without the need for additional legislation. For example, if a recipient (e.g., City of
Salem) is named in the authorizing language but a different legal entity (e.g., Salem Wastewater
1 In the FY 2023 Consolidated Appropriations Act, EPA received a total of 733 CDS/CPF projects for
$1,502,588,541. Of this total, 715 projects are for water community projects; this document pertains to these
projects.
2 | Page
-------
Utility) owns the infrastructure, the recipient can request a technical correction. As another
example, if the Appropriations Act provides for a specific type of project (e.g., drinking water)
when a different type of project (e.g., wastewater) is needed, the recipient can request a technical
correction to change the project type.
Appropriate Types of Technical Corrections
A technical correction can be made for all, or part of a project identified in an Appropriations
Act to change the recipient, the purpose, or both. The statutory language that provides EPA with
the authority to make technical corrections does not limit the extent to which a technical
correction can alter the original project, if the new project provides for water quality protection
or involves construction2 of drinking water, wastewater, or stormwater infrastructure. Technical
corrections cannot, however, be used to change the project purpose to debt repayment, because
debt repayment does not meet the statutory terms of the authority. After consultation with the
House and Senate Committees on Appropriations, EPA will generally approve changes in
purpose that meet the above criteria or changes in recipient where both the original entity and the
new entity to be named concur with the change. Any technical correction request involving a
change to both the purpose and the recipient entity must be accompanied by additional
documentation explaining:
• The need or reason for the change;
• The relationship between the two entities;
• Who initiated the request; and
• The involvement of any third parties, if known.
Additional information on technical corrections is provided in Appendix C.
Cost Share Requirements
Appropriations Acts require each Community Grant recipient to provide a cost share from non-
federal sources unless the recipient is approved for a cost share waiver by EPA. For FY 2023, the
cost share amount is 20% of the total grant project cost. All contributions toward cost share
should be included in the grant budget and must be categorized in the appropriate grant budget
category (see Appendix D for more information on budget development). The source of the cost
share must be included in the workplan and payment requests. EPA may pay 80% of costs shown
on approved payment requests up to the approved federal funding amount.
• All grant funds, including a cost share, can be used only for allowable costs in executing
the project. All cost sharing funds must have supporting source documents (a record that
supports a transaction).
• Services donated to recipients may be furnished by professional and technical personnel
and consultants in accordance with 2 CFR 200.434. Dollar values must be placed on all
2 "The term 'construction' means any one or more of the following: preliminary planning to determine the feasibility
of treatment works, engineering, architectural, legal, fiscal, or economic investigations or studies, surveys, designs,
plans, working drawings, specifications, procedures, field testing of innovative or alternative waste water treatment
processes and techniques meeting guidelines promulgated under section 1314(d)(3) of this title, or other necessary
actions, erection, building, acquisition, alteration, remodeling, improvement, or extension of treatment works, or the
inspection or supervision of any of the foregoing items." (33 U.S.C. § 1292(1)).
3 | Page
-------
donated services in accordance with 2 CFR 200.306. All cost sharing funds must be
included in the workplan and budget and be part of the grant's total project costs.
• All cost sharing funds must conform to the same laws, regulations, grant conditions, etc.,
as the federal funds within the grant; recipients may prefer to limit cost sharing to the
amount required.
See Appendix D and Appendix F for information on general principles of cost allowability.
Sources of Cost Share
Eligible sources of "non-federal" funds to meet the cost share requirement are described below;
recipients can use any or a combination of the following eligible sources if the requirements in 2
CFR 200.306 are met:
1) Public sources3. The following public funding sources can be used to meet the cost share
requirement:
• State appropriations;
• Local government match to the grant project;
• U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Community Development
Block Grant funds;
• U.S. Department of Agriculture, Rural Development funds;
• Appalachian Regional Commission funds; and,
• The CWSRF and DWSRF programs if those funds are:
o non-federal funds such as loan repayments, interest earnings, bond proceeds, and
fees, or
o a state contribution to the SRF above the statutorily required 20% match.
Note: EPA has issued a class deviation document pertaining to CWSRF and a policy
memo pertaining to DWSRF that allow Community Grant recipients to use certain
sources of funds from the two SRF programs as the non-federal cost share. The class
deviation and policy documents allow SRF programs to use the non-federal and non-
state match share of SRF funds to provide loans that Community Grant recipients can
use as the cost share for community projects.
Funding made available to jurisdictions through the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021
(ARPA), including ARPA Revenue loss funds, cannot be used to meet the non-federal
cost share requirement.
2) Private sources. These include funding from a business or nonprofit contributing to the
project.
3) In-kind services. These may include the applicant's administrative expenses for
managing and overseeing the grant and projects, provided that the expenses are not being
reimbursed by the federal share of the grant award. In-kind services contributed by other
3 Community Grant recipients can use federal funds from other programs as all, or part, of the cost share only if the
statute authorizing those programs specifically allows the funds to be used as match for other federal grants.
Additionally, other federal program funding must be allowed to support the planning, design and/or construction of
drinking water, wastewater, or stonnwater infrastructure projects.
4 | Page
-------
entities may also be allowable as cost share. Force accounts may be used as in-kind
services: personnel costs include salaries, wages, and allowable incentive compensation
for recipient employees (i.e., who receive W-2 forms) who spend time working on the
project. In-kind (cost share) contributions must be verifiable and documented. For
example, if the recipient does not intend to charge the EPA assistance agreement for all
time employees spend working on the project, the applicant may include salaries or
wages in the personnel category for cost share purposes.
Determining Cost Share Amount
For the purposes of calculating the cost share amount, the amount specified in the FY 2023
Appropriations Act for EPA's contribution represents 80% of the total grant project cost.
Grant applications are not required to reflect costs that exceed total grant project costs as
calculated below; this is the minimum total grant project cost required to receive the full FY
2023 appropriation amount.
The following example demonstrates how to calculate the cost share amount using $100,000
as the EPA contribution:
A. Identify the Total Grant Project Cost
Divide the EPA contribution by .80 to calculate the total grant project cost:
$100,000-0.80 = $125,000.
$125,000 is the total grant project cost
B. Multiply the Total Grant Project Cost by .20 to determine the cost share amount
Total grant project cost x .20 = required cost share amount
$125,000 x .20 = $25,000
$25,000 is the required 20% cost share amount
C. Confirm
Total grant project cost = EPA Contribution + Cost Share Amount.
$125,000 = $100,000 + $25,000
Waivers to Cost Share Requirements
EPA supports waiving required non-federal cost share for projects located in, or that primarily
serve, disadvantaged communities. EPA is using the discretion provided by the FY 2023
Appropriations Act (see Appendix A) to consider waiving or reducing statutorily required non-
federal cost share on Community Grant funds when requested and appropriate.
5 | Page
-------
For projects identified in the FY 2023 Appropriations Act, EPA will consider the Cost Share
Waiver Criteria A - F4 below, in defining disadvantaged communities for the purposes of
Community Grants. This set of criteria differs from that which is available when EPA considers
requests for waivers from the cost share requirement for projects identified in the FY 2022
Appropriations Act.5 Projects identified in the FY 2023 Appropriations Act that are in
communities that meet at least one of the criteria below may request a waiver of the non-federal
cost share requirement under the Community Grants Program. Systems that serve large service
areas with a specific project that will primarily serve a subset of its service area that meets one of
these criteria may also request a waiver.
Waivers to the cost share requirement must be approved by EPA's Assistant Administrator for
Water, in accordance with EPA's Delegation of Authority 1-102.6 Recipients requesting cost
share waivers should submit a written request to the Regional EPA Project Officer for
consideration. Waiver requests should include applicable Cost Share Waiver Criteria(s) and any
related supporting documentation including source data retrieved from the websites noted below.
Many of the criteria can be found online on the Census Bureau's website. Recipients can start by
entering their community's name in the search bar and viewing the community's profile. Tables
and graphics from the Census Bureau's website can be downloaded or embedded in a recipient's
cost share waiver request. Recipients should use the most recent data available. Specific tables
with more detailed information and other publicly available datasets beyond the community
profile page for each metric are provided below.
Cost Share Waiver Criteria
A. Community median household income (MHI) is less than 80% of State Mill
o MHI can be found on a community's profile page of the US Census Bureau - use
the search function to find your community. Communities should use the most
recent data available,
o MHI is also available for most communities from the latest annual Census
American Community Survey (ACS) data collection. In the few cases where a
4EPA developed Cost Share Waiver Criteria A - F for the purposes of assessing the appropriateness of waiving the
cost share requirement for the 715 drinking water, wastewater, stonnwater infrastructure, and water quality
protection projects identified in the FY2023 Consolidation Appropriations Act, based on EPA's Memorandum:
Implementation of the Clean Water and Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Provisions of the Bipartisan
Infrastructure Law. March 8, 2022 (see Attachment 1, Appendix E, of the memorandum).
5 EPA's FY 2022 Community Grants Implementation Guidance identifies three criteria that are not available for
consideration of cost share waivers for projects identified in the FY 2023 Appropriations Act: Communities with >
3.4% unemployed population > 16 years in civilian labor force. Communities with > 12.1% vacant households, and
Communities in counties with Social Vulnerability Index scores higher than 0.80.
6 EPA's Delegation of Authority 1-102, Grants and Cooperative Agreements for Water Infrastructure Projects or
Other Water Resource Projects from Funds Appropriated for the State and Tribal Assistance Grant Account or the
Environmental Programs and Management Account, authorizes EPA's Assistant Administrator for Water and
Regional Administrators, "To approve and administer grants and cooperative agreements for water infrastructure
projects or other water resource projects from funds appropriated for the State and Tribal Assistance Grant Account
or the Enviromnental Programs and Management Account or any successor accounts, including a project authorized
by Section 510 of the Water Quality Act of 1987, P.L. 100-4, 101 Stat. 7,80, EPA's FY 1991 Appropriations Act
(P.L. 101-507), and any subsequent public law; and to perform other activities necessary for the effective
administration of those grants and cooperative agreements."
6 | Page
-------
local jurisdiction's MHI is not available, the surrounding county's MHI may be
sufficient. The Census Bureau provides annual 5-Year Average Median
Household Income data in Table B19013. Click on the B19013 Table, select
GEOS and search under "most common geographies" select "State" and then
select the relevant and enter community name in the search bar.
B. Communities with $25,766 or less upper limit of Lowest Quintile Income
• Communities can view their Lowest Quintile Income on the Census Bureau
website and search by community name and "B19080 HOUSEHOLD INCOME
QUINTILE UPPER LIMITS." Communities should use the most recent data.
C. Communities with > 30.9% Population Living Under 200% of Poverty Level
o The US Department of Health and Human Services provides US Federal Poverty
Guidelines, including a chart with percentage of poverty levels (i.e., 200%).
o More detailed information on the population living under the poverty level can be
found in Table S1701: Poverty Status in the Past 12 months for communities.
D. Community with census tracts that have a poverty rate greater than or equal to
20%
o Percent of the poverty rate can be found on a community's profile page provided
by the Census Bureau.
o More detailed information can be found in Table S1701: Poverty Status in the
Past 12 months.
E. Combined sewer and drinking water costs are greater than 2% of the 20th
percentile household income
o Communities can view their Lowest Quintile Income on the Census Bureau
website and search by community name and "B19080 HOUSEHOLD INCOME
QUINTILE UPPER LIMITS". Communities should use the most recent data.
o The total bills for one year for residential customers can be found from the
community's local utilities.
F. Communities with > 11.7% Population Receiving Food Stamps/SNAP Benefits
o Communities can find the percentage of their population receiving SNAP benefits
on the Census Bureau website. Select "view state and local data" to search by
state and then City/town or county.
Insular Territories Projects
The non-federal cost share requirement is waived for any community projects located in the U.S.
territories. This is consistent with the Omnibus Territories Act of 1977, which authorizes
Departments and Agencies to award grants to Insular Territories, such as the U.S. Virgin Islands,
without a match requirement.
Tribal Projects
Consistent with the implementation of the Clean Water Indian Set-Aside Grant Program under
Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 518 and the Drinking Water Infrastructure Grants Tribal Set-
Aside Program under Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) Section 1452(i), which do not require
tribal cost share, EPA will waive the non-federal cost share for tribal community projects.
7 | Page
-------
Grant Administration: Community Grants Lifecycle
EPA's Community Grant appropriations are STAG infrastructure grants to improve water
infrastructure and water quality through funding for drinking water, wastewater, and stormwater
projects. Appendix B lists the 715 water CDS/CPF projects identified in the FY 2023
Appropriations Act. These 715 projects are collectively funded "off the top" at a level of
$863,108,642 from the FY 2023 general CWSRF appropriations and $609,255,899 from the FY
2023 general DWSRF appropriations.
EPA's Regional Offices will administer Community Grants as authorized under EPA's
Delegation of Authority 1-102.6 Per EPA's Delegation of Authority 1-14A,7 EPA Regional
Administrators are authorized to award grants and cooperative agreements, including
Community Grants, that were appropriated in FY 2023.
The following sections describe the lifecycle stages of each award. Additional information on
grants policies and resources, including on receiving and managing EPA grants, is listed in
Appendix F.
Pre-Award Phase
While Congress directs Community Grant funds to specified recipients for defined projects,
recipients are required to fulfill statutory and regulatory requirements before EPA can award
grant funding. These requirements include but are not limited to providing necessary information
for the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) environmental review, review of any pre-
award costs, and submitting a complete grant application package. Appendix D and Appendix
E provide information on grant application package content and submission.
1. NEPA Environmental Review
As required by EPA's NEPA implementing regulations (40 CFR 6.100-6.406). EPA must
complete the NEPA review process before awarding a grant for design and/or construction.
The requirement for an environmental review under NEPA generally does not apply to grants
solely for planning activities, such as infrastructure assessments, watershed plans, and
wastewater capital improvement plans. Applicants should check with their EPA Regional
Contact to determine if NEPA applies to a particular Community Grant. See the Regulations
and Requirements section and Appendix F for additional information about NEPA
Environmental Review.
2. Pre-award Costs and Procurement Review
Costs incurred prior to grant awards may be eligible for reimbursement if the costs are in
conformance with applicable federal and EPA statutes and regulations. Incurred costs are
financial obligations: costs owed by an entity as a result of a transaction. The costs may have
7 EPA's Delegation of Authority 1-14.1. Assistance Agreements, authorizes Regional Administrators, the Assistant
Administrator for Mission Support, and the Chief Financial Officer, "To take all necessary actions to award, obligate
and de-obligate funds for, and administer fellowship, grant, cooperative and loan agreements (hereinafter financial
assistance), and to make any final determinations required by law or regulations, with eligible recipients."
8 | Page
-------
been paid or remain unpaid. The regulations at 2 CFR 200.458 require that pre-award costs
be incurred ".. .directly pursuant to the negotiation and in anticipation of the Federal award
where such costs are necessary for efficient and timely performance of the scope of work.
Such costs are allowable only to the extent that they would have been allowable if incurred
after the date of the Federal award and only with the written approval of the Federal
awarding agency. If charged to the award, these costs must be charged to the initial budget
period of the award, unless otherwise specified by the Federal awarding agency or pass-
through entity."
For Community Grants projects identified in the FY 2023 Appropriations Act, pre-award
costs must be incurred on or after October 1, 2022, to be considered for eligibility.
Notwithstanding, and consistent with 2 CFR 1500.9. all costs incurred before EPA makes the
award are at the recipient's risk. EPA shall review the eligibility of such costs on a case-by-
case basis prior to approving the project budget and awarding the grant.
A review of pre-award costs includes a review of contracts executed prior to award for
compliance with applicable procurement regulations as described in Regulations and
Requirements.
3. Application Forms, Workplan, and Submitting an Application
Upon completion of an environmental review under NEPA, development of a project
workplan8, and review of any pre-award costs (including any costs related procurement),
applicants should submit a complete grant application package to EPA. The workplan and
application must include any pre-award costs. Recipients must ensure that their organizations
have registered with the federal government's System for Award Management (SAM).
Recipients must have an active registration/record with SAM.gov and complete the
Grants.gov registration process to apply for any federal funding.
The complete grant application includes several forms, as described in Appendix D. These
forms must be downloaded from the Community Grant opportunity package on Grants.gov -
generic versions of the standard forms not downloaded from the Grants.gov website will not
8 The SRF appropriations are the vehicles being used to appropriate the CDS/CPF funds. However, the SRF
authorities do not govern or authorize the CDS/CPF grants. The Consolidated Appropriations Act is structured so
that the CDS/CPF funding is taken from the total amount in the SRF appropriations prior to the SRF allocation to
the states. Accordingly, Program Results Codes (PRCs) have been assigned to each CDS/CPF project's funding
based on the SRF account from which each project's funding was appropriated. However, the authorities governing
the CDS/CPF projects are the language in the FY 2023 Consolidated Appropriations Act, which states that,
".. .$863,108,642 of the funds made available for capitalization grants for the Clean Water State Revolving Funds
and $609,255,899 of the funds made available for capitalization grants for the Drinking Water State Revolving
Funds shall be for the construction of drinking water, wastewater, and storm water infrastructure and for water
quality protection..." and in the explanatory statement accompanying the FY 2023 Consolidated Appropriations Act
(Appendix A)." Therefore, CDS/CPF grant/workplan activities may entail construction of drinking water,
wastewater, and storm water infrastructure, and water quality protection related tasks, irrespective of EPA's
assignment of PRC. Additionally, there is language in the explanatory statement that indicates the SRF is not
intended to be the authority for the CDS/CPF funds. For example, the explanatory statement states: "Applicable
Federal requirements that would apply to a Clean Water State Revolving Fund or Drinking Water State Revolving
Fund project grant recipient shall apply to a recipient receiving a CDS/CPF grant under this section." That direction
would be unnecessary if Congress was appropriating the CDS/CPF funds under the SRF authorities.
9 | Page
-------
be accepted. See Appendix D for instructions on how to navigate to the Funding Opportunity
Package and download the standard forms. Appendix F includes information on budget
development and allowability of costs. In addition to the required forms, grant applicants
must submit a project workplan that describes the proposed project, the milestone schedule,
the need for the project, and the anticipated environmental and public health benefits (outputs
and outcomes). See Community Grants Workplan Contents/Outline in Appendix E for more
information.
Applicants must submit a complete application package (with all required forms, a workplan,
and additional required documentation) for EPA review and approval, through the grants.gov
portal. See additional information in Appendix D.
Post-Award Phase
After receiving an award, the recipient is ready to start working on the activities outlined in the
approved workplan. Adhering to various grant regulations and the terms and conditions outlined
in the grant agreement are critical to ensuring a successful grant project.
• Recipients submit payment requests to EPA for incurred costs. In some cases, pre-award
costs may be included. Once the payment request is approved, the recipient can draw down
the requested amount. As required by 2 CFR 200.305(b). EPA requires that recipients of
EPA financial assistance participate in the Automated Standard Application for Payments
(ASAP) system. Recipients must request payment for the minimum amounts needed for
actual and immediate cash. Recipients will submit a payment request including supporting
documentation such as copies of bills (vouchers, invoices, etc.), along with a description of
services rendered, time spent, and charges for EPA review and approval. After review and
approval, EPA will pay the recipient for the federal share of the allowable costs shown on the
payment request. Information on ASAP is available online.
• EPA grants contain General, Administrative, and Programmatic terms and conditions, which
include reporting requirements such as filing an interim (annual) Federal Financial Report
(FFR), annual MBE/WBE Reporting, and progress report submission. EPA's General Terms
and Conditions are applicable to all EPA awards, and additional terms and conditions for
Community Grants awards will be specified in individual award agreements. Recipients
should regularly review grant award terms and conditions throughout the life of the project to
ensure that the organization remains in compliance with all requirements and must inform
EPA if problems arise that jeopardize the completion of the project. EPA Regional Offices
perform construction monitoring and oversight.
• Recipients' personnel payroll and records system must be capable of providing reports on the
activities of each employee who works directly on a grant. Charges to federal awards for
salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed.
Activity reports are typically signed by the individual employee and/or by a responsible
supervisory official having first-hand knowledge of the activities performed by an employee.
The supervisor should be able to certify that the distribution of activity represents a
reasonable estimate of the actual work performed by the employee during the periods
10 | P a g e
-------
covered by the reports. 2 CFR 200.430 provides additional information on Standards for
Documentation of Personnel Expenses.
• Recipients should contact the EPA Project Officer should any changes to the grant agreement
(e.g., workplan, milestone schedule, budget) become necessary for the project to succeed, as
soon as possible to discuss the changes. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.308. most changes
must be approved by EPA and may require a formal amendment to the assistance agreement.
• EPA conducts administrative monitoring, including reviewing recipient invoices/payment
requests and programmatic reports, and can request access to all records and conduct grant
audits. EPA can disallow costs and take enforcement actions if the recipient fails to remain in
compliance.
Closeout Phase
Closeout refers to the process EPA uses to determine that a recipient has completed all the
required workplan activities under a grant and confirm that all applicable financial and
administrative requirements as described in 2 CFR 200.344 have been met.
• Recipients must submit the final progress report according to the terms and conditions listed
in the grant agreement and should demonstrate satisfactory completion of all workplan tasks
and activities.
• Recipients prepare and submit several reports as part of the grant closeout process. EPA's
Frequently Asked Questions about Closeouts provides information about closeout
requirements, procedures, records retention, and associated regulations. EPA provides more
information for recipients via the online course on closing out grants.
Regulations and Requirements
Recipients are responsible for compliance with many statutes, regulations, and requirements
including but not limited to EPA's general regulations. In addition, each grant agreement will
specify terms and conditions that establish a legally binding agreement between EPA and the
recipient including but not limited to EPA's General Terms and Conditions. Details and
information related to several requirements that are of particular importance for recipient
compliance prior to receiving grant awards are discussed below. Additional information and
resources on these requirements, including recipient responsibilities for compliance, can be
found in Appendix F. EPA will review documentation from recipients to assess eligibility of
costs incurred in accordance with EPA's General Principles for Cost Allowability, as described
in EPA's Interim General Budget Development Guidance.
Environmental Review
NEPA and other relevant applicable statutes and Executive Orders, such as the Endangered
Species Act (ESA), apply to Community Grants projects authorized by the Annual
Appropriations Acts. The applicable NEPA regulations are the Council of Environmental
11 | P a g e
-------
Quality's (CEQ) implementing regulations at 40 CFR Parts 1500-1508 and EPA's NEPA
regulations at 40 CFR Part 6. In accordance with EPA's NEPA regulations, EPA must complete
the NEPA process before issuing a grant award for construction activities.
NEPA and other cross-cutting Federal requirements that apply to the project (i.e., the approval
and/or funding of work beyond the conceptual design point) cannot be delegated. Although EPA
may fund the recipient's development of an Environmental Information Document (EID) or
other analysis for cross cutting authorities or executive orders in order to provide supporting
information, EPA has the legal obligation to make the NEPA related decision, to issue the NEPA
documents, to sign NEPA determinations, and to fulfill other cross-cutting Federal requirements
before approving or paying for design and/or construction. Therefore, EPA grant funds cannot be
used to prepare a federal document, such as an Environmental Assessment (EA) or
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).
When both EPA and another Federal agency are funding the same project, the agencies may
negotiate an agreement for one to be the lead agency for performing grant oversight and
management activities, including those related to NEPA and other cross-cutting Federal
requirements. The lead agency can be the one that is providing the most funds for the project, or
the agency that provided the initial funds for the project. The CEQ NEPA regulations at 40 CFR
1501.7(c) provide the factors listed in order of descending importance to determine the lead
agency designation. If an EIS is required on a joint or related Federal action, EPA may serve as a
co-lead or request to be a cooperating agency. In addition, EPA may adopt another Federal
agency's EIS or EA. Note EPA may adopt another Federal agency's EA and use it as a basis for
its Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI), provided EPA has independently reviewed the EA
and agrees with the analysis and circulates the FONSI and attached EA for the requisite 30-day
comment period.
Recipients with CWSRF or DWSRF co-funded projects for which a State Environmental Review
Process (SERP) has been completed can submit the completed state analysis for EPA review.
EPA will review the SERP document and will incorporate by reference any pertinent part of that
document into EPA's environmental document. EPA will request additional information from
the recipient if necessary for EPA to conduct its own environmental analysis.
Each federal agency has its own regulations pertaining to the NEPA environmental review
process. Recipients with projects that have undergone an environmental review by another
federal agency may submit documents pertaining to another federal agency's analysis for EPA
review. EPA will independently review these documents to determine if the proposed actions is
substantially the same and if it meets the standards of an adequate EIS, EA, or Categorical
Exclusion (CATEX) determination. If so, EPA may adopt the federal EIS, EA, or CATEX
determination, pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.3. If EPA is unable to adopt the federal EIS, EA, or
CATEX determination, EPA will conduct its own environmental review and incorporate by
reference any pertinent part of the agency's environmental document. EPA will request
additional information from the recipient if necessary for EPA to conduct its own environmental
review. See Appendix F for additional information on CATEX and EID development.
12 | P a g e
-------
For design and construction projects for which another federal agency has not completed a
NEPA review and projects that CWSRF or DWSRF do not co-fund and/or have not undergone a
SERP, recipients will need to determine whether to request a CATEX from EPA or to prepare
and submit an EID in order to proceed with a NEPA review.
Procurement
In general, all procurement transactions for professional engineering services and construction
contractors must be conducted in a manner that includes and promotes fair and open competition
from an adequate number of qualified sources. 2 CFR 200.320 details the specific methods of
procurement to be followed and the circumstances under which each method can be used.
Recipients and subrecipients must have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent
with State, local or tribal laws and regulation as well as Federal laws and regulations in
accordance with the Procurement Standards contained in 2 CFR 200.317 - 2 CFR 200.327.
In accordance with 2 CFR 200.325. recipients must provide EPA with technical specifications on
proposed procurements when requested by EPA, including when pre-award costs are being
considered for eligibility. In addition, upon request by EPA's Grants Management Office (GMO)
under 2 CFR 200.325 or 2 CFR 200.337. grantees must provide procurement documents to EPA
for pre-procurement review when EPA is concerned that the grantee's procurement procedures
or practices do not comply with federal procurement requirements, including but not limited to
procurements that do not comply with competition requirements. As provided in 2 CFR
200.332(d) and the terms of conditions of their EPA award, pass-through entities are responsible
for monitoring subrecipient compliance with procurement requirements in 2 CFR Parts 200 and
1500. EPA's GMO may also request that pass-through entities provide EPA with information
regarding subrecipient compliance with these requirements.
Selection of Architects and Engineers (projects inclusive of CWSRF-eligible activities)
Projects consisting of CWSRF-eligible activities, irrespective of whether such projects are co-
funded with CWSRF funding, must comply with the procurement processes for architectural and
engineering (A/E) services as identified in 40 U.S.C. 1101 el seq., or an equivalent State
requirement. Where equivalent State requirements are complied with, the source of the
requirement (e.g., existing State legislation or regulation, etc.) must be stated, and the Governor
of the State must provide a certification to accompany the grant application that the State's A/E
procurement requirements are equivalent to 40 U.S.C. 1101 et sea.. In lieu of a certification from
the Governor, the Attorney General's certification submitted with each grant application may
include the A/E certification.
EPA's Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program
EPA's DBE Program applies to all EPA Assistance Agreements and requires recipients who
procure goods and/or services to: employ the good faith efforts, document their efforts, and
maintain DBE forms and other documentation from the prime contractor. EPA grant recipients
and subrecipients are required to seek and encouraged to utilize disadvantaged business
enterprises (DBEs) for their procurement needs under grant agreements. Recipients and
subrecipients must ensure that their contracts contain the following term and condition:
13 | P a g e
-------
"The contractor shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national
origin, or sex in the performance of this contract. The contractor shall
carry out applicable requirements of 40 CFRPart 33 in the award and
administration of contracts awarded under EPA financial assistance
agreements. Failure by the contractor to carry out these requirements is a
material breach of this contract which may result in termination of this
contract or other legally available remedies."
Other DBE requirements are identified in 40 CFR Part 33.
Davis Bacon Act (DBA)
The DBA requires that all contractors and subcontractors performing construction, alteration,
and repair (including painting and decorating) work under federal contracts in excess of $2,000,
pay their laborers and mechanics not less than the prevailing wage and fringe benefits for the
geographic location. DBA requirements may be extended to federal financial assistance
programs by the terms of other statutes (referred to as Davis Bacon and Related Acts (DBRA))
establishing or funding the programs. The FY 2022 Appropriations Act provides that those
federal requirements that would apply to a CWSRF or DWSRF project grant recipient shall also
apply to a grantee receiving a Community Grant, and the FY 2023 Appropriations Act directs the
Agency to follow the guidance in the joint explanatory statement accompanying the FY 2022
Appropriations Act (see Appendix A). Consequently, the FY 2023 Appropriations Act extends
DBRA provisions applicable to state revolving fund projects to the Community Grants. Clean
Water Act (CWA) Sec. 513 applies DBA requirements to projects for treatment works. DBA
requirements apply to all laborers and mechanics employed by contractors and subcontractors
with job duties that are physical and manual in nature including: laborers and mechanics,
watchmen or guards (under certain conditions), and working foremen (under certain conditions).
The term laborer or mechanic does not include workers whose duties are primarily
administrative, executive, or clerical, rather than manual. Requirements only apply to
construction at the "site of the work," which has generally been defined as the physical place
where the construction occurs. Work conducted off-site is generally not covered. EPA's Interim
Davis-Bacon Act Guidance provides additional information on requirements and compliance.
Build America, Buy America (BABA)
BABA states that: "[N]one of the funds made available for a Federal financial assistance
program for infrastructure.. .may be obligated for a project unless all of the iron, steel,
manufactured products, and construction materials used in the project are produced in the United
States." Project means any activity related to the construction, alteration, maintenance, or repair
of infrastructure in the United States. This law applies to all Federal financial assistance as
defined in section 2 CFR 200.1. whether funded through the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs
Act (IIJA) or not. New awards made on or after May 14, 2022, must comply with BABA
requirements. EPA provides information and guidance on BABA compliance, implementation,
and any applicable waivers. Recipients are required to ensure that procurement plans comply
with BABA requirements prior to grants being awarded.
14 | Page
-------
American Iron and Steel (AIS)
The AIS provision requires recipients to use iron and steel products that are produced in the
United States for the construction, alteration, maintenance, or repair of a public water system or
treatment works. Compliance with AIS requirements for iron and steel products will satisfy a
subset of BABA requirements (e.g., those pertaining to iron and steel); however, BABA also
includes requirements pertaining to manufactured goods and construction materials, which must
also be met. Projects in compliance with BABA are in compliance with AIS. EPA provides
information and guidance on AIS compliance and implementation, any applicable waivers, as
well as a step-by-step process for requesting waivers and the circumstances under which waivers
may be granted.
Federal Cross-cutting Requirements/Other Applicable Federal Laws
Recipients must comply with Federal cross-cutting requirements as well as other applicable
Federal laws. These requirements may include but are not limited to -
• Environmental Authorities: Archeological and Historic Preservation Act, Pub. L. 93-
291, as amended; Clean Air Act, Pub. L. 95-95, as amended; Clean Water Act, Titles III,
IV and V, Pub. L. 92-500, as amended; Coastal Barrier Resources Act, Pub. L. 97-348;
Coastal Zone Management Act, Pub. L. 92-583, as amended; Endangered Species Act,
Pub. L. 93-205, as amended; Environmental Justice, Executive Order 12898; Flood Plain
Management, Executive Order 11988, as amended by Executive Order 12148; Protection
of Wetlands, Executive Order 11990, as amended by Executive Order 12608; Farmland
Protection Policy Act, Pub. L. 97-98; Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, Pub. L. 85-
624, as amended; Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, Pub. L.
94-265; National Environmental Policy Act, Pub. L. 91-190; National Historic
Preservation Act, Pub. L. 89-655, as amended; Safe Drinking Water Act, Pub L. 93-523,
as amended; Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, Pub. L. 90-54, as amended;
• Economic and Miscellaneous Authorities: OSHA Worker Health and Safety Standards;
Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act, Pub. L. 91-54; Debarment and
Suspension, Executive Order 12549; Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan
Development Act, Pub. L. 89 -754, as amended, and Executive Order 12372; Drug-
Free Workplace Act, Pub. L. 100-690; Copeland "Anti-kickback" Act, Pub. L. 73-324;
Government Neutrality Toward Contractor's Labor Relations, Executive Order
13202, as amended by Executive Order 13208; New Restrictions on Lobbying,
Section 319 of Pub. L. 101-121; Prohibitions relating to violations of the Clean
Water Act or Clean Air Act with respect to Federal contracts, grants, or loans
under Section 306 of the Clean Air Act and Section 508 of the Clean Water Act,
and Executive Order 11738; Uniform Relocation and Real Property Acquisition
Policies Act, Pub. L. 91-646, as amended;
• Civil Rights, Nondiscrimination, Equal Employment Opportunity Authorities: Age
Discrimination Act, Pub. L. 94-135; Equal Employment Opportunity, Executive
15 | P a g e
-------
Order 11246; Section 13 of the Clean Water Act, Pub. L. 92-500; Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act, Pub. L 93-112, supplemented by Executive Orders 11914 and
11250; Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, Pub. L 88-352;
o Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, EPA has a responsibility to ensure that
federal funds are not being used to subsidize discrimination based on race, color,
or national origin. This prohibition against discrimination under Title VI has been
a statutory mandate since 1964, and EPA has had Title VI regulations since 1973.
EPA's nondiscrimination regulations prohibit recipients of EPA financial
assistance from taking actions in their programs or activities that are intentionally
discriminatory and/or have a discriminatory effect based on race, color, national
origin (including limited English proficiency), age, disability, or sex.
• Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Authorities: EPA's FY 1993 Appropriations
Act, Pub. L. 102-389; Section 129 of the Small Business Administration
Reauthorization and Amendment Act, Pub. L. 100-590; Small, Minority and
Women Owned Business Enterprises, Executive Orders 11625, 12138, and 12432.
Regional Contacts
For general questions about the Community Grants Program, or for project specific questions that
require the assistance of an EPA Regional Office, contact the EPA Regional Contact.
16 | P a g e
-------
Appendix A: Statutory Language
The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023,9 contains the following provision:
For environmental programs and infrastructure assistance, including capitalization
grants for State revolving funds and performance partnership grants, $4,480,428,000, to
remain available until expended, of which— (1) $1,638,861,000 shall be for making
capitalization grants for the Clean Water State Revolving Funds under title VI of the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act; and of which $1,126,101,000 shall be for making
capitalization grants for the Drinking Water State Revolving Funds under section 1452 of
the Safe Drinking Water Act: Provided, That $863,108,642 of the funds made available
for capitalization grants for the Clean Water State Revolving Funds and $609,255,899 of
the funds made available for capitalization grants for the Drinking Water State Revolving
Funds shall be for the construction of drinking water, wastewater, and storm water
infrastructure and for water quality protection in accordance with the terms and
conditions specifiedfor such grants in the explanatory statement described in section 4
(in the matter preceding division A of this consolidated Act) for projects specified for
' 'STAG—Drinking Water SRF" and ' 'STAG—Clean Water SRF" in the table titled
' 'Interior and Environment Incorporation of Community Project Funding
Items Congressionally Directed Spending Items'' included for this division in the
explanatory statement described in section 4 (in the matter preceding division A of this
consolidated Act), and, for purposes of these grants, each grantee shall contribute not
less than 20 percent of the cost of the project unless the grantee is approved for a waiver
by the Agency[. J
The aforementioned "explanatory statement10" accompanying the Consolidated Appropriations
Act, 2023, states:
The bill provides $4,480,428,000 for the State and Tribal Assistance Grants program and
includes the following specific funding levels and direction: Community Project Funding
Items/Congressionally Directed Spending Items.-From within funds provided for
capitalization grants for the Clean Water State Revolving Fund and the Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund, the Committees recommend $863,108,642 from the Clean Water
SRF and $609,255,899 from the Drinking Water SRF be for Community Project
Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending grants for the construction of drinking
water, waste-water, and storm-water infrastructure and for water quality protection. The
Agency is directed to follow the guidance in the joint explanatory statement
accompanying Public Law 117-103.
The aforementioned joint "explanatory statement11" accompanying Public Law 117 - 103, states:
9 P.L. 117-328.
111 Explanatory Statement Explanatory Statement for Division G of P.L. 117-328.
11 Explanatory Statement for Division G of P.L. 117-103.
17 | P a g e
-------
Community Project Funding Items/Congressioncilly Directed Spending Items.—From
within funds provided for capitalization grants for the Clean Water State Revolving Fund
and the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund, the Committees recommend $443,639,051
fi'om the Clean Water SRF and $397,766,044 fi'om the Drinking Water SRF be for
Community Project Funding Congressionally Directed Spending grants for the
construction of drinking water, waste-water, and storm-water infrastructure andfor water
quality protection. Each project shall provide not less than 20 percent matching funds fi'om
non-Federal sources, unless approvedfor a waiver. Applicable Federal requirements that
would apply to a Clean Water State Revolving Fund or Drinking Water State Revolving
Fund project grant recipient shall apply to a grantee receiving a CPF grant under this
section. The Committees note that the following funding sources are to be treated as non-
Federal funds and can be used to meet the non-Federal matching fund requirement: U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development, Community Development Block Grant
program; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Rural Development Program; and Appalachian
Regional Commission grants. Funding made available to jurisdictions through the
American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (P.L. 117-2) are considered Federal funds and may
not be applied towards the non-Federal cost share requirement. A detailed list of projects
is in the table titled "Interior and Environment Incorporation of Community Project
Funding Items Congressionally Directed Spending Items. "
18 | P a g e
-------
Appendix B: List of EPA Congressionally Directed Spending Community Projects
and Funding Levels
(FY 2023 Consolidated Appropriations Act)
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
The list below is organized by: (1) Community projects funded by the Clean Water SRF; and (2) Community projects
funded by the Drinking Water SRF. Projects are arranged alphabetically by state within each category. Note that EPA
made grammatical changes to remove extra spaces, hyphens, and periods. The original CDS list should be referred to
for technical corrections.
Community Projects Funded with Clean Water SRF Appropriations (alphabetical by state)
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
AK
Municipality of Anchorage for the Regional Landfill
Leachate Treatment Facility
13,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
AK
City of Kenai for Digestor Blower Replacements at the
Wastewater Treatment Plant
2,900,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
AK
City of Seldovia for Bloch Street Sewer Line
Replacement
746,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
AK
City ofWasilla for Wastewater Treatment Plant Sludge
Digestor
2,500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
AK
Municipality of Anchorage for the Powder Reserve
Access Project
4,500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
AK
Municipality of Anchorage for Ruane Road Culvert
Replacement
1,600,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
AK
City of St. George for Potable Water and Sewer Line
Replacement
3,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
AK
City of Seward for Sludge Removal for the Lowell Point
and SMIC Sewage Treatment Lagoons
2,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
AK
City of Soldotna for Wastewater Treatment Plant
Headworks Rehabilitation
680,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
AK
City ofWasilla for Wastewater Treatment Plant Sludge
Drying Beds
2,300,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
AK
City of Soldotna for Wastewater Biosolids Dewatering
960,000
19 | P a g e
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
AK
Municipality of Anchorage for the Holtan Hills Sewer
Access Project
2,500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
AK
City of Valdez for Municipal Sewer Force Main
Replacement
5,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
AK
City of Palmer for Wastewater Treatment System
Upgrade
6,900,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
AK
City of Seldovia for Lower Section of Raw Water
Transmission Line Replacement
414,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
AK
City of Soldotna for pH Control of Wastewater Effluent
320,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
AK
City of Craig for Replacing Lift Stations in the Craig
Wastewater Collection and Treatment System
760,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
AK
Petersburg Borough for Water Treatment Plant Clear
Well Replacement
1,600,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
AK
Ketchikan Gateway Borough for Mountain Point
Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrades
1,760,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
AK
City ofWasilla for Wastewater Treatment Plant Suction
Dredge
880,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
AK
Tagiugmiullu Nunamiullu Housing Authority for
Wastewater Replacement Project
1,200,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
AL
City of Dauphin Island Stormwater Management Project
2,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
AL
City of Alexander City Coley Water Wastewater
Treatment Plant Project
5,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
AR
City of Wilson for Clean Water Infrastructure
2,500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
AR
City of Yellville Wastewater Collection and Treatment
Improvements
2,160,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
AZ
Mohave County for Grace Neal Channel Stormwater
Project
1,250,000
20 | P a g e
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
AZ
Gila Valley Irrigation District for Highline Canal
Nonpoint Source Pollution Control
333,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
AZ
City of Show Low for Sewer Line Replacement
800,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
AZ
Santa Cruz County for Storm Water Management at
Ephraim Canyon
2,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
AZ
Greenlee County for New Model Canal Stormwater
Management
361,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
AZ
Wellton-Mohawk Irrigation and Drainage District for
Wellton Canal Pipeline Project
500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
AZ
Central Arizona Irrigation and Drainage District for
New Water Conveyance System to Enable Nonpoint
Source Pollution Control
934,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
AZ
Pima County for a Stormwater Drain at El Vado Wash
1,200,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
AZ
Silver Creek Flood Control District for Millet Swale
Stormwater Management Project
2,224,350
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
AZ
City of Chandler for a Reclaimed Water Interconnect
Facility
3,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CA
Occidental County Sanitation District for Pipeline
Design and Preconstruction Activities
1,450,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CA
County of Butte for Palermo Clean Water Consolidation
Project
2,500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CA
Tolowa Dcc-Ni' Nation for Tolowa Wastewater
Infrastructure Improvements
1,250,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CA
San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District for a
Stormwater Recharge Project
2,500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CA
City of Rialto for the Lake Rialto Habitat Management
and Community Open Space
2,000,000
21 | P a g e
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CA
City of Santa Paula for the Harvard Boulevard Water
and Sewer Pipeline Replacement
2,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CA
City of Simi Valley for the Sewer Line Replacement
near Easy Street and the Arroyo Simi
1,684,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CA
Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District Canyon Lake
Water Treatment Plant Phase 2 Upgrades
3,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CA
Eastern Municipal Water District Quail Valley Septic -
to-Sewer Conversion Project
2,500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CA
Orange County Sanitation District for a Supercritical
Water Oxidation Project
3,452,972
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CA
County of Santa Cruz for a Boulder Creek Sanitation
District Expansion Project
2,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CA
Eastern Municipal Water District Wine Country Sewer
Infrastructure Project
2,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CA
Western Municipal Water District Western Water
Recycling Facility Project
3,920,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CA
Padre Dam Municipal Water District—East County
Advanced Water Purification Joint Powers Authority
Project
2,400,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CA
Yorba Linda Water District Green Crest Lift Station
Rehabilitation Project
300,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CA
City of San Clemente for Avenida Cordoba/ Via Avila
Storm Drain Improvements
1,600,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CA
City of Oceanside for the Loma Alta Creek Sewer
Relocation
3,452,972
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CA
South Coast Water District for a Coastal Recycled
Water Expansion Program
3,452,972
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CA
City of Los Angeles for a Hyperion Water Reclamation
Plant Modernization project
3,452,972
22 | P a g e
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CA
Sacramento Area Sewer District for a Franklin
Community Septic to Sewer Conversion Project
3,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CA
Helendale Community Service District Wastewater
Treatment Plant Tertiary Upgrade Engineering and
Design Project
1,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CA
Big Bear Area Regional Wastewater Agency Replenish
Big Bear Lake Project
1,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CA
San Bernardino County—Desert Knolls Wash Phase IV
Project
2,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CA
City of Twentynine Palms Wastewater Treatment
Facility Phase III
1,275,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CA
Monterey One Water for a Cybersecurity and SCADA
Resilience Project
1,252,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CA
City of Coronado for the Parker Pump Station
3,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CA
City of Paramount for the Spane Park Regional
Stormwater Infiltration Facility
2,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CA
City of Redwood City for the Douglas Avenue Pump
Station Project
1,200,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CA
City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo
County for a Stormwater Capture Project
2,400,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CA
Western Municipal Water District for a PFAS Treatment
and Prevention Project
3,452,972
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CA
City of McFarland Wastewater Treatment Plant
Expansion Project
5,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CA
County of San Diego for a Smuggler's Gulch Dredging
Project
3,452,972
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CNMI
Commonwealth Utilities Corporation for an Engineering
Report and Assessment
911,302
23 | P a g e
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CO
Town of La Jara for Wastewater Sewer Lagoon Rehab
Project
600,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CO
Town of De Beque for Wastewater Treatment Plant
1,246,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CO
Town of Wellington for a Water Infrastructure Project
608,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CT
Town of Torrington Water Pollution Control Authority
for Harris Drive Pump Station Upgrade
1,600,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CT
Norwich Public Utilities for Sewer Gravity Pipe Lining
Project
800,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CT
Town of Monroe for Senior Center Septic Tank
Replacement
200,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CT
Save the Sound for Designing and Demonstrating Green
Infrastructure Alternatives Across Bridgeport
200,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CT
Save the Sound for Hamden Town Center Park-Green
Stormwater Infrastructure
80,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CT
City of Bridgeport Water Pollution Control Authority
(WPCA) for Design of the West Side Wastewater
Treatment Plant Project
3,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CT
Town of Coventry for the Coventry/Bolton Gateway
Sewer Extension Project
1,200,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CT
Somers Water Pollution Control Authority for Facility
Treatment Improvements
945,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CT
City of Stamford for the Stamford Bioswales Initiative
1,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
CT
Western Connecticut Council of Governments for a
Sanitary Sewer Infrastructure Study
200,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
DE
Partnership for the Delaware Estuary, Inc. for The
Mussels for Clean Water Hatchery
1,000,000
24 | Page
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
DE
City of Seaford for Wastewater Treatment Plant
Headworks Replacement
2,500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
DE
City of Wilmington for Sewer Interceptor Rehabilitation
3,060,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
DE
City of Wilmington for Sewer-Stormwater Separation
4,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
FL
Pinellas County Government Anclote Road Stormwater
and Roadway Improvements
2,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
FL
Town of Longboat Key Wastewater Main Replacement
3,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
FL
Hillsborough County for a Septic to Sewer Project
1,920,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
FL
Pinellas County for a Baypointe Regional Stormwater
Treatment Facility Project
3,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
FL
City of Treasure Island for a Master Pump Station
Project
1,217,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
FL
City of Ocoee for a Utility Upgrade Project
1,408,412
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
FL
City of Wilton Manors for a Stormwater Improvement
Project
1,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
FL
City of Hialeah Sewer Line Revitalization
5,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
FL
Miami-Dade County Stormwater Drainage
Improvement
420,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
FL
City of Marco Island—Clean Waters Marco Island
Project
260,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
FL
City of Cape Coral Reclaimed Water Transmission
Main, Caloosahatchee River Crossing Project
1,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
FL
City of Naples Phase 2 Naples Red Bay Tide Septic
Tank Mitigation
5,000,000
25 | P a g e
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
FL
City of Sanibel Slough Dredge and Water Quality
Improvement Project
1,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
FL
City of Delray Beach for a Water and Wastewater
Infrastructure Project
3,452,972
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
FL
City of Homestead Septic to Sewer Conversion Project
2,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
FL
City of Jacksonville for a Septic Tank Phase Out Project
3,452,972
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
FL
City of Port St. Lucie—St. Lucie River/C—23 Water
Quality Project
324,483
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
FL
City of Sanford for Georgetown Stormwater
Improvements
1,086,544
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
FL
Seminole County for a Washington Street Outfall
Stormwater Project
1,304,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
FL
St. Johns County Stormwater Infrastructure
Improvement Project
400,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
FL
City of Jacksonville Septic Tank to City Sewer
Connection Project
3,300,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
FL
Miami-Dade County Stormwater Local Drainage
Improvement Project for SW 216 Street from Old Cutler
Drive to SW 87 Avenue
420,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
FL
City of North Port Sewer Vacuum Station Installation
Project
2,300,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
FL
Town of Southwest Ranches for a Drainage and Water
Quality Project
600,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
FL
Miami-Dade County for a Septic to Sewer Conversion
Project—El Portal & Miami Shores
3,452,972
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
FL
Miami-Dade County for Remediation of 127th Street
Canal—Opa Locka
3,452,972
26 | P a g e
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
GA
Clayton County Board of Commissioners for Camp
Creek Watershed Flood Reduction Infrastructure
2,688,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
GA
City of Thomson for Stormwater Project
965,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
GA
City of Thomasville for Wastewater Master Plan Phase
1 Implementation
1,200,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
GA
Augusta-Richmond County for Storm Sewer
Improvements
4,093,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
GA
County of Chatham for Storm Water and Sea Level Rise
Impact Study
500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
GA
Bulloch County for Wastewater Infrastructure
3,010,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
GA
City of Waynesboro for Sewer Line Improvements and
Upgrades
2,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
GA
City of Colquitt for a Wastewater Pollution Control
Plant Project
1,187,200
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
GA
City of Leesburg for a Sewage and Clean Water
Infrastructure Project
949,146
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
GA
City of Tybee Island Stormwater Detention System
Project
2,600,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
GA
City of Roswell for a Children's Stormwater Garden and
Adventure Path Project
3,452,972
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
GA
Fulton County for the Friendship Pump Station Project
3,452,972
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
GA
City of College Park for a South East Sewer Wastewater
Pump Station Project
2,500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
GA
City of College Park for Stormwater Upgrades
800,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
HI
City and County of Honolulu for Green Storm Water
Infrastructure
679,000
27 | P a g e
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
HI
County of Maui for Recycled Wastewater Distribution
600,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
HI
State of Hawaii for Pearl Harbor Aquifer Recovery
Projects
1,720,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
HI
County of Kaua'i for Sewer Collection Inspection
1,200,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
IA
City of Clive for the Greenbelt Landing Project
500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
IA
City of Pacific Junction for a Green Infrastructure
Project
1,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
IA
City of Dubuque Granger Creek Lift Station
Improvements at Catfish Creek Sanitary Sewer System
1,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
IA
City of Maquoketa Wastewater Treatment Plant
Improvements
3,500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
ID
City of Roberts Clean Water Project
2,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
ID
City of Grace Wastewater Collection and Treatment
Systems Improvement
2,560,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
IL
Village of Diamond for Watermain Replacement and
Repair Lift Stations
601,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
IL
City of Cahokia Heights for Sanitary Sewer
Improvements
2,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
IL
Village of Cedar Point for Wastewater Treatment Plant
Renovation Project
530,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
IL
City of Streator for WWTP Oxidation Ditch and
Maintenance Project
1,200,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
IL
Northern Moraine Water Reclamation District for
Wastewater Treatment Plant Emergency Power
Upgrades
250,000
28 | P a g e
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
IL
Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Chicago for
Forging Resilient Communities Program
3,500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
IL
City of Peoria for Sewer Extension
600,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
IL
City of Streator for Storm Sewer Installation
400,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
IL
Will County for Updates to Fairmont Water and Sewer
System
500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
IL
City of Mt. Vernon Sanitary Sewer Lining Project
2,411,896
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
IL
Wheaton Sanitary District for Secondary Clarifier
Upgrades
2,655,400
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
IL
Village of Heyworth Sanitary Sewer Inflow &
Infiltration Reduction Project
1,600,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
IL
City of Northlake for a Sanitary Sewer Lining
Replacement Project
3,200,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
IL
Village of Hanover Park for a UV Disinfection System
Project
600,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
IL
Northern Moraine Wastewater Reclamation District for
a Sanitary Sewer Extension Project
2,500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
KS
City of Garden City for Water Reclamation and Reuse
19,100,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
KS
Wyandotte County for a Kaw Point Wastewater
Treatment Plant Project
2,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
KY
Georgetown Municipal Water and Sewer Service
(GMWSS) WWTP1 Upgrade & Expansion
5,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
KY
Montgomery County Sanitation District Improvements
3,000,000
29 | P a g e
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
KY
City of Bardstown—Bardstown Town Creek
Wastewater Treatment Plant Reactor & Clarifier
Upgrade
2,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
KY
Springfield Water & Sewer Commission—Springfield
City Barn Pump Station Replacement
1,399,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
KY
Louisville and Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer
District for a Neighborhood Drainage Project
1,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
KY
Louisville and Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer
District for Odor Control Improvements
500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
LA
City of Gonzalez for Wastewater Treatment Upgrades
1,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
LA
Lafayette Consolidated Government Sewer Lift Station
and Force Main—Downtown Lafayette and University
Avenue Project
5,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
LA
City of Monroe Calypso Street Pump Station Project
4,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MA
City of Holyoke for River Terrace Area 21 CSO
Elimination Project—Phase A
2,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MA
Town of Agawam for North Street (White Brook)
Culvert Replacement Project
1,280,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MA
Town of Medway for Restoring Green Infrastructure for
Healthy Rivers and Climate Resilience
1,300,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MA
City of Melrose for Ell Pond Park Stormwater
Management and Resiliency Project
1,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MA
Town of Foxborough for a Sewer Design Route 1
Project
400,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MA
City of Watertown for a Stormwater Tree Trench
Project
240,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MA
City of Framingham for the Lake Waushakum Clean
Water Project
1,700,000
30 | P a g e
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MA
Martha's Vineyard Airport Commission for Wastewater
Treatment Facility (WWTF) Upgrades
1,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MA
City of Brockton for the Biosolids Sludge Dryer Project
2,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MA
Town ofNorthborough for Water System Upgrades
491,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MA
Town of North Reading for Wastewater Collection and
Conveyance System Final Design
1,500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MA
City of Gloucester for a Water Pollution Control Facility
Project
2,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MA
Town of Reading for Maillet Sommes and Morgan
Stormwater Wetlands
2,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MA
City of Chicopee for a Water Pollution Control Facility
2,854,800
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MD
Town of Grantsville for Wastewater Treatment Plant
Upgrade
1,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MD
Prince George's County for Restoration of Lower
Beaverdam Creek
500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MD
Talbot County for Sewer Extension Project and Royal
Oak Pump Station Replacement
911,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MD
Somerset County for the Smith Island Clean Water
Project
2,250,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MD
Town of Centreville for Water/Wastewater
Infrastructure Renovation and Upgrade
2,155,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MD
City of Brunswick for Wastewater and Drinking Water
Treatment Plant Upgrades
550,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MD
City of Baltimore for Egg Shaped Digesters
Rehabilitation
3,452,972
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
ME
Town of Dover-Foxcroft for Dover-Foxcroft
Wastewater Treatment Facility Improvements
1,000,000
31 | P a g e
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
ME
Greater Augusta Utility District for Sewer Pump Station
Consolidation
2,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
ME
Town of Mattawamkeag for Mattawamkeag Lagoon
Sludge Dredging
520,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
ME
City of Calais for Calais North Street Sewer
Remediation Project
500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
ME
Mapleton Sewer District for West Chapman Road
Sanitary Sewer Replacement
783,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
ME
Eagle Lake Water and Sewer District for Eagle Lake
Wastewater Treatment & Pumping Stations Upgrade
1,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
ME
Town of Grand Isle for Water and Wastewater
Treatment Plant and Pump Station Upgrades and Sludge
Drying Bed
1,296,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
ME
Winthrop Utilities District for Winthrop Pump Stations
Upgrade
1,896,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
ME
York Sewer District for Route 1 Corridor Sewer
Extension
1,500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
ME
Town of Hampden for Souadabscook Pump Station
Replacement
2,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
ME
Town of Windham for North Windham Wastewater
Treatment Facility
2,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
ME
Solon Water District for Solon Water Main
Replacement
340,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
ME
Town of Gorham for Feasibility Study for Sewer and
Water Distribution System
240,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
ME
Town of Bar Harbor for Up Island Water Tank Storage
1,439,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
ME
City of Saco for Electrical Phase of the Saco Water
Resource Resiliency Project
1,574,000
32 | P a g e
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
ME
Town of Dixfield for a Hall Hill Road Pump Station
Project
514,400
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
ME
City of Ellsworth for a High Street Pump Station
1,774,075
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
ME
Loring Development Authority for a Sewer
Replacement and Infiltration/Inflow Removal Project
1,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
ME
Town of Blue Hill for a Wastewater Treatment Facility
1,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
ME
City of Saco for a Water Resource Resiliency Project
3,452,978
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MI
Oscoda Charter Township for Water Distribution
System for Potable Water
3,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MI
Marquette County for KI Sawyer Clean and Safe Water
Initiative
1,500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MI
Evergreen Farmington Sanitary Drain Drainage District
for Pump Station Improvement Project
4,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MI
City of Bay City for Update to Storm Sewer System—
Banks Area
800,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MI
Township of Grosse lie for Upgrades to the Wastewater
Treatment Plant
3,452,972
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MI
Great Lakes Water Authority for a PFAS Compounds
Remediation Project
3,452,972
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MI
West Bloomfield Parks and Recreation Commission for
a Pond Remediation Project
320,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MI
Macomb County for Lake St. Clair Trash Capture
Project
1,600,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MI
Port Huron Township Maywood Sanitary Sewer Pump
Station Rehabilitation
1,450,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MI
Charter Township of Chesterfield Maurice DeMuynck
Anchor Bay Pump Station Repair
4,000,000
33 | P a g e
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MI
City of Grand Rapids Water Resource Recovery Facility
Groundwater Treatment Project
1,700,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MI
City of Midland Sylvan Pump Station Detention Basin
Project
1,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MI
Northwestern Oakland Drainage District for a Sanitary
Sewer Extension Project
1,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MI
City of Birmingham for a Combined Sewer System
Critical Rehabilitation Program
1,300,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MI
City ofNorthville for the Randolph Drain Serenity Point
and Riverbank Stabilization Project
560,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MI
Village of North Adams Lagoon Repair and Compliance
750,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MI
Berlin Charter Township for a Waste Water Discharge
Line Project
3,040,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MN
City of Brooten for Water Service Expansion
2,500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MN
Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community for
Recycling Facility Project
2,500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MN
City of Birchwood Village for a Sewer Lift Station
Replacement Project
480,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MN
Shorewood Park Sanitary District for the community
sewer expansion project
1,900,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MN
Northern Township for the Sewer and Water
Infrastructure Project to install water and sanitary sewer
extensions
5,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MO
Saline County for Interstate 70 and Highway 65
Interchange Improvements
2,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MO
Village of Pollock for Sewer Collection System
5,061,000
34 | Page
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MO
City of St. Joseph Mainline Sewer Lining Project
4,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MO
City of Camden for the Point Sewer Project
3,361,707
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MO
City of Willard Water Systems Treatment Upgrade
2,978,320
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MS
Town of Crawford for Water and Wastewater
Infrastructure
3,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MS
City of Jackson for Savanna Wastewater Treatment
Plant Phase IB Improvements
4,800,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MS
City of West Point for Water and Wastewater
Infrastructure
2,500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MS
Town of Sardis for Wastewater System Improvements
2,500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MS
City of Pearl—North Pearl Interceptor Rehabilitation
3,500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MS
Town of Pelahatchie Wastewater Treatment Facility
Upgrade and Sewer Rehab/Replacement
3,500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
MS
City of Clinton for Regional Wastewater Project
3,200,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NC
Brunswick County for Northwest Water Treatment Plant
to Bell Swamp Transmission Project
2,105,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NC
Warren County for the Pleasant Hills Wastewater Pump
Station Replacement
838,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NC
City of Wilson for Sewer Collection System
Improvements
3,452,972
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NC
City of Winston-Salem for Runnymede Water
Infrastructure Improvements
2,800,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NC
Town of Kernersville for Beeson Creek Stream
Restoration
2,420,000
35 | P a g e
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NC
Town of Holly Springs for a Water Reclamation Project
3,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NC
Town of Holden Beach Greensboro Street Lift Station
#2 Hazard Mitigation Upgrade
2,669,867
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NH
Belknap County Conservation District for Reservoir
Road Culvert Replacement Stormwater Project
150,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NH
Town of Bristol for Pump Station and Force Main
1,050,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NH
Town of Durham for Bennet Road Stormwater and
Flood Resiliency Project
2,040,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NH
Southern District YMCA for Erosion Mitigation at
Kingston Lake (Great Pond) Protection
75,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NH
Town of Winchester for Wastewater Biosolids
1,900,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NH
City of Dover for Stormwater Management
800,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NH
Lake Winnipesaukee Association for Comprehensive
Protection Initiative
500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NH
Town of Gorham for a Water and Sewage Infrastructure
Project
220,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NH
Town of Derry for the Route 28S Sewer Line Extension
Project
3,200,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NJ
Borough of Woodland for Park Rifle Camp Road Sewer
Line Project
709,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NJ
Town of Guttenberg for Galaxy CSO Chamber
Elimination Project
394,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NJ
Borough of Fort Lee for Sewer Pump Station Upgrades
600,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NJ
Borough of Prospect for Park Main Sewer Line Repair
Project
442,000
36 | P a g e
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NJ
Borough of Cliffside Park for Oakdene Avenue
Stormwater Improvements Project
1,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NJ
City of Rahway for Lead Service Line Replacement
Project
1,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NJ
Vernon Township for a Sewer Expansion Project
3,452,972
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NJ
City of Hackensack for a Storm Water Discharge
Project
3,452,972
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NJ
Township of Teaneck for Belle Avenue Drainage
Improvements
1,060,780
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NJ
Township of Bedminster for a Miller Lane Pump Station
Project
1,176,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NJ
Town of Phillipsburg for Sanitary Sewer System
Rehabilitation
3,360,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NJ
Borough of Rutherford for a Stormwater Management
Project
750,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NJ
Borough of Edgewater for Pump Station No.4 Project
1,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NJ
County of Essex for an Urban Rooftop Farming
Stormwater Management System
2,823,150
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NJ
Town of Parsippany-Troy Hills for the Pump Station
No. 4 Sanitary Sewer Redirection Project
3,452,972
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NJ
Township of North Bergen for a Drainage Improvement
Project
3,452,972
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NM
El Valle de Los Ranchos Water & Sanitation District for
a Sewer Main
1,860,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NM
Village of Maxwell for Wastewater Treatment Upgrades
1,900,000
37 | P a g e
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NM
East Pecos Mutual Domestic Water Consumer's
Association for Connecting Additional Homes to Sewer
Lines and Centralized Treatment
3,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NM
Town of Edgewood for Water Quality Improvement
Facility
900,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NM
City of Las Vegas Sewer Rehabilitation Project
1,152,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NM
Santo Domingo Pueblo for a Wastewater Distribution
System
1,500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NM
Santa Clara Pueblo for a Water Treatment and
Wastewater Facility Design
640,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NM
Town of Mountainair for Wastewater Treatment Facility
Improvements
3,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NV
Churchill County for Water Storage Tank
3,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NV
Clark County Water Reclamation District for Logandale
Sewer Collection Extension
2,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NV
Incline Village General Improvement District for
Effluent Export Pipeline
1,600,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NV
City of Sparks for Truckee Meadows Water
Reclamation Facility Disinfection Upgrades
800,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NV
City of Reno Booth Street Sewer Siphon
1,500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NV
City of Fallon Wastewater Treatment Plant Dewatering
Press
4,369,600
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NV
Southern Nevada Water Authority for a Septic
Conversion Program
3,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NV
Clark County for a Water Infrastructure Project
2,000,000
38 | P a g e
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NY
Town of Webb for Wastewater Treatment Facility
Infrastructure Improvements
1,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NY
Save the Sound for Hutchinson River Watershed Plan
700,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NY
Monroe County for Genesee Valley Pump Station
1,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NY
Chemung County for Sewer District WWTP
Consolidation
1,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NY
Town of Poughkeepsie for Hudson Heritage Sewer
System
1,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NY
Suffolk County Oakdale Sewer Expansion Project
5,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NY
Town of Concord Combined Wastewater Treatment
Plant Project
2,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NY
Village of New Square for a Drainage and Flood
Mitigation Improvement Project
2,400,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NY
Town of Owasco Sanitary Sewer System Improvement
Project
2,500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NY
Town of Cornwall for the Hasbrouck Area Drainage
Project
1,650,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NY
County of Putnam for the Southeast Sewer Diversion
Project
2,125,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NY
Village of Dolgeville Main Street Sanitary Sewer
Rehabilitation Project
2,640,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NY
Village of Greenwich Waste Water Treatment Plant
Reconstruction
4,400,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NY
Village of Dolgeville Fink Creek Flood Mitigation
Project
5,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NY
Village of Canastota—South Canal, Commerce, and
State Street Sewer Separation Project
1,507,605
39 | P a g e
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NY
Tioga County Soil and Water Conservation District—
Upper Susquehanna River Watershed Resilience Project
1,580,628
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NY
Village of Oneida for the Oneida Castle Sanitary Sewer
Collection System Project
4,152,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NY
Village of Marathon Waste Water Treatment Plant and
Pump Station Rehabilitation
3,480,960
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NY
Town of Brookhaven—Mastic/Mastic Beach/Forge
River Sewer District Project
4,250,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NY
Suffolk County Smithtown Business District Sewer
Extension Project
3,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NY
Suffolk County North Bellport Sewers Project
3,260,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NY
Town of Southampton Riverside Sewer System Project
5,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
NY
Village of Southampton Lake Agawam Algae
Harvesting Project
5,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
OH
Cuyahoga County for the MLK Boulevard Sewer
Project
1,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
OH
City of Shaker Heights for the Lomond/ Lynnfield
Sanitary Sewer Overflow (SSO) Project
1,600,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
OH
Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District for a CSO
Elimination Project in Garfield Heights
2,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
OH
City of Wilmington New Wastewater Treatment Plant
Project
400,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
OH
Village of Plain City Wastewater Treatment Plant
Expansion Project
1,500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
OH
Madison County Board of County Commissioners
Summerford Sanitary Sewer Project
765,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
OH
City of Forest Park West Kemper Road Storm Water
Improvement Project
1,209,900
40 | P a g e
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
OH
City of New Franklin for the Vanderhoof Road Pump
Station East Project
3,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
OH
City of Brunswick Healey Creek Storm Water
Management Project
1,500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
OH
Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District Smith Road
Storm Water Project
2,724,800
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
OH
Village of Scio Sanitary Sewer Extension
500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
OH
Belmont County Water and Sewer District Sanitary
Sewer Project
800,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
OH
City of Kirtland Old Town Sewer Project
820,890
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
OH
City of Willoughby Chagrin Floodplain Restoration and
Protection Project
2,323,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
OH
Board of Lucas County Commissioners for Unsewered
Areas of Curtice-Williston
2,532,832
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
OH
City of Port Clinton for Phase 1 Sewer & Waterline
Improvements
3,452,972
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
OH
City of Dayton Wolf Creek Sanitary Liners Installation
Project
3,360,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
OH
Adams County Commissioners Alexander Salamon
Airport Sewer Extension
2,845,552
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
OH
Ross County Board of Commissioners Union Heights
Wastewater Infrastructure Improvements
4,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
OK
City of Hinton for Improvements to Wastewater Lagoon
System
289,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
OK
Town of Canadian for Wastewater System
Improvements
1,599,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
OK
City of Porter for New Disinfection Facility
1,320,000
41 | P a g e
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
OK
City of Perkins for Sewer Line Replacement
320,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
OK
Town of Corn for Rehabilitation of Wastewater Lagoons
640,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
OK
City of Barnsdall for Replacement of Waxhoma Dam
Spillway
1,600,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
OK
City of Wewoka for Dam Rehabilitation
68,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
OK
City of Ponca City for Rehabilitation of Major
Interceptor
1,500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
OK
City of Ada Wastewater Treatment Plant and Water
Reuse
400,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
OK
City of Midwest City S.E. 15th Street Drainage Project
3,200,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
OR
Talent Irrigation District for Billings Siphon and
Eastside Canal Project
5,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
OR
Owyhee Irrigation District for Kingman Lateral Pipeline
3,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
OR
Ochoco Irrigation District for McKay Creek
Infrastructure Improvement
2,500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
OR
City of Carlton for Sewer Collection Pipe Replacement
2,200,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
OR
Clackamas County for a Watershed Protection Project
and Wastewater Facility Decommission
2,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
OR
City of Aumsville for a Waste Water Treatment Plant
Project
1,252,950
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
PA
Wyoming County for Sewage Pollution Prevention
325,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
PA
Freeport Borough for Long-Term Control Plan
Implementation and Improvements
1,500,000
42 | P a g e
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
PA
City of Lancaster for Combined Sewer Separation
500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
PA
Lower Ten Mile Joint Sewer Authority for Chartiers
Road Sewer Extension
500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
PA
Wyoming Valley Sanitary Authority for Restoration,
Retrofits, and Acquisition Projects
3,452,972
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
PA
Milford Borough for a Central Sewage and Stormwater
Project
3,452,972
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
PA
Whitpain Township for the Ambler Alley Storm Sewer
Project
220,416
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
PA
Allegheny County Sanitary Authority for an Effluent
Flushing Water Improvements Project
3,234,170
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
PA
City of Coatesville for the Ash Park Master Plan
Implementation Phase I
1,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
PA
Cumberland Township/Cumberland Twp. Authority
Greenmount Area Sewer Service Engineering Project
1,120,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
PA
Mercersburg Water Authority Water System
Improvement Project
2,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
PA
Cranberry Township Brush Creek Water Pollution
Control Facility Plant Solids Processing and Dewatering
Upgrades
5,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
PA
Crafton Borough for the Broadhead Avenue Sewer
Separation Project
991,758
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
PA
Bellevue Borough for Straw Avenue Sanitary Sewer
Improvements
720,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
PA
Scott Township for a Sanitary Sewer Repair Project
999,999
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
PA
Mount Pleasant Township Municipal Authority—
Hickory, Southview and Westland Sanitary Sewer
Project
3,500,000
43 | P a g e
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
RI
City of Warwick for Oakland Beach Pump Station
Replacement
2,400,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
RI
City of Pawtucket for Citywide Sewer CCTV and
Cleaning
3,164,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
RI
City of Warwick for Oakland Beach Force Main
Rehabilitation and Lining
1,440,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
RI
City of Warwick for Apponaug Pump Station Upgrades
536,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
RI
Town of Smithfield for a Water and Sewer Project
840,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
RI
Town of Cumberland for a Returning Stormwater
Runoff Project
1,200,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
RI
Town of Bristol for the Sewer Rehabilitation Area 2 and
3 Project
1,248,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
SC
MetroConnects for Union Bleachery Mill Village Sewer
Replacement Project
4,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
SC
City of Beaufort for Bayard Street Drainage
Improvement and Stormwater Project
800,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
SC
Pickens Regional loint Water System for a water
treatment plant
4,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
SC
Aiken County for Horse Creek Waste Water Treatment
Plant
5,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
SC
Pee Dee Council of Governments for Water Treatment
Plant-1 Service Road
423,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
SC
City of Pendleton for Pendleton-Clemson Wastewater
Treatment Plant
5,300,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
TN
City of Luttrell Wastewater Treatment Plant
2,522,800
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
TN
City Of Maynardville Wastewater System
Improvements
1,600,000
44 | Page
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
TX
Village of Salado Stormwater Improvement Project
1,500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
TX
City of Temple Sanitary Overflow Reduction Project
5,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
TX
Montgomery County Municipal Utility District Number
84 Bentwood Drainage Channel Improvement Phase I
Project
2,999,568
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
TX
Harris County Flood Control District Woodridge
Stormwater Detention Basin
5,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
TX
Harris County Flood Control District Q534 Stormwater
Detention Basin
5,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
TX
Harris County Municipal Utility District 468
Stormwater Detention Basin
2,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
TX
City of Kyle for the Reclaimed Water Master Plan
Project
2,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
TX
City of Bellaire for a Water and Wastewater Line
Replacement Project
2,400,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
TX
El Paso County Planning & Development Department
Sandhills Wastewater Collection System Project
2,500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
TX
City of San Juan for a Lift Station Rehabilitation Project
3,452,972
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
TX
City of Mercedes for an Expansion of Sanitary Sewer
Collection System Project
1,549,044
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
TX
City of Waco Bull Hide Regional Reclamation Plant
Project
3,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
UT
City of Orem Wasatch Front Water Conservation Effort
3,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
UT
Logan City for the Biodigester Project
5,000,000
45 | P a g e
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
UT
Millville City Sewer Project
3,500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
UT
Summit County Weber River Watershed Resilience
Partnership Project
1,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
VA
City of Harrisonburg for Western Raw Water Line
Project Phase 3
1,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
VA
Town of South Boston for Storm Sewer Improvements
2,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
VA
Amherst County Service Authority for James River
Bank Stabilization
2,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
VA
City of Norfolk for Ballentine Place Water and Sewer
Replacement
1,600,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
VA
Town of Haymarket for Stormwater Assessment
160,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
VT
Lake Iroquois Association for Beebe Lane Stormwater
Improvements
320,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
VT
Town of Whitingham for Sewer Infrastructure Upgrades
1,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
VT
Town of Chelsea for a Pump Station Project
600,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
WA
City of Lake Stevens for Lake Stevens Outlet
Restoration
500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
WA
City of Long Beach for Lift Station Replacements
1,670,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
WA
Town of Maiden for Replacement Municipal Sewer
System
1,911,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
WA
City of Sultan for a Water Treatment Plant Project
1,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
WA
City of Washougal Wastewater Treatment Plant Anoxic
Selector Project
1,000,000
46 | P a g e
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
WA
City of Port Townsend for a Sewer Pump Station
Project
2,500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
WA
Jefferson County for a Port Hadlock Sewer Project
3,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
WA
City of Oak Harbor for an Inflow and Infiltration (I&I)
Correction Program
1,950,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
WA
Mountains to Sound Greenway Trust for a Creek
Restoration Project
1,023,632
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
WA
Town of Steilacoom for a Garrison Springs Creek
Restoration Project
1,500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
WI
City of Viroqua for a Sewer Project
1,223,400
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
WI
City of Sun Prairie for a Water Pollution Control
Facility Solar Radiation Project
3,200,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
WV
Mason County Public Service District for Apple Grove
Sewer Collection System Project
1,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
WV
Elk Valley Public Service District for Elk River
Embankment Stabilization and Sanitary Sewer
Relocations Project
3,887,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
WV
Raleigh County for Raleigh County Piney View—
Batoff Mountain Waterline Extension
1,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
WV
Barboursville for Wastewater System Upgrade &
Lagoon Decommissioning
5,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
WV
Spencer for Municipal Wastewater System Inflow &
Infiltration Reduction Project
1,652,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
WV
Ansted for Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrade
4,400,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
WV
Town of Romney for Sewer System Improvements
Project
400,000
47 | P a g e
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
WV
McMechen for Wastewater Treatment Plant
300,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
WV
Greater Harrison County PSD River Crossing
Replacement
500,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
WV
Town of Davis Sewer Collection System Improvements
5,000,000
STAG—Clean Water State
Revolving Fund
WV
Shady Spring Public Service District—Glen Morgan
Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrade
2,000,000
Community Projects Funded with Drinking Water SRF Appropriations (alphabetica
by state)
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
AK
City ofWhittier for Well Field Upgrades
1,230,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
AK
Chickaloon Village Traditional Council for Community
Well in Chickaloon
250,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
AK
City and Borough of Yakutat for Waterline Extension
Project
5,082,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
AK
City of Nome for Potable Water Distribution and
Wastewater Collection Systems
1,600,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
AL
Town of Garden City Water System Improvements
520,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
AL
Mobile County Water, Sewer, and Fire Protection
Authority Water Well Project
1,280,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
AR
Fulton Waterworks for City of Fulton Water System
Delivery
3,050,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
AR
Central Arkansas Water for West Pulaski County Water
Delivery
12,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
AZ
Bullhead City for New Drinking Water Well
Construction Project
2,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
AZ
Town of Carefree for Silver Saddle Pressure Zone
Waterline Improvement Project
800,000
48 | P a g e
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
AZ
City of Page for Water Treatment Plant Expansion
Project
456,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
AZ
City of Douglas for a Supervisory Control and Data
Acquisition System
833,285
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
AZ
Town of Kearny for a Water Infrastructure Project
3,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
AZ
Hopi Tribe for a Water Infrastructure Improvement
Project
1,500,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
AZ
Maricopa-Stanfield Irrigation and Drainage District for
the Santa Rosa Canal Project
2,846,076
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
AZ
City of Page for New Intake Pipes from Lake Powell
3,432,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CA
East Palo Alto for East Palo Alto Water Infrastructure
Improvements
800,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CA
County of Tulare for Drinking Water Kiosks
200,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CA
Woodville Public Utility District for Woodville PUD
Well No. 4 Replacement
1,150,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CA
City of Modesto for Grayson Well and Tank
Replacement
1,750,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CA
Allensworth Community Services District for
Allensworth Well Solar Array
150,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CA
City of Tulare for Water Delivery System
500,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CA
City of Dinuba for Well 21 Construction
1,500,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CA
Carmichael Water District for Aquifer Storage and
Recharge Well #2
2,500,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CA
Citrus Heights Water District for the Highland Avenue
Well Project
1,500,000
49 | P a g e
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CA
Sacramento County for a Regional Conjunctive Use
Project
2,800,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CA
City of Oxnard for a Water Pipeline Replacement
2,846,400
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CA
Cachuma Operation and Maintenance Board for the
Lake Cachuma Pumping Facility Project
500,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CA
City of Atwater for the Buhach Road and Gurr Road
Utility Extension
3,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CA
Solano Irrigation District for Quail Creek Well
Relocation and Associated Conveyance Facilities
2,824,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CA
City of Ripon for the SSJID Surface Water Connection
Project
3,452,972
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CA
Stanislaus County for a Crows Landing Water Wells
Project
3,452,972
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CA
Valley Center Municipal Water District Lilac Road
Pipeline Replacement Project
3,060,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CA
Borrego Water District—Borrego Spring Road
Transmission Main and Sun Gold Pipeline Replacement
Projects
3,392,667
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CA
Orange County Water District PFAS Groundwater
Treatment Project
5,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CA
Placer County Water Agency Alta Loop Pipeline Project
1,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CA
City of Sacramento for the Shasta Groundwater Well
Project
3,452,972
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CA
City of Azusa for Aspan Well Treatment and
Rehabilitation
2,500,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CA
City of Salinas for the Castroville Seawater Intrusion
Project
900,000
50 | P a g e
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CA
Soquel Creek Water District for a Water Reliability
Improvement Project
1,416,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CA
City of Hemet for the Oakland and Santa Fe Water Main
Replacement Project
1,200,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CA
Coachella Valley Water District for a Water
Consolidation Project
3,452,972
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CA
City of Santa Fe Springs for Water Well No. 12
Assessment and Treatment
2,200,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CA
Water Replenishment District of Southern California for
Five Groundwater Well Projects
2,500,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CA
City of Pleasanton for a PFAS Treatment and Well
Rehabilitation Project
2,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CA
Eastern Municipal Water District for the Well 56 & 57
PFAS Removal Project
3,452,972
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CA
City of Pomona for Groundwater Treatment R34
1,600,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CA
City of Chino for a Treatment Plant Groundwater Wells
4 & 6 Project
2,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CA
City of Fowler New Well and System Interconnection
for Drought Resiliency Project
3,005,200
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CA
City of Inglewood for a Water Main Replacement
Project
3,452,972
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CO
Beulah Water Works District for Raw Water Storage
380,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CO
Town of Naturita for Wastewater Treatment Plant
Lagoon Upgrade and Collection System
1,250,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CO
City of Delta for North Delta Water Line Replacement
380,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CO
City of Trinidad for a Drinking Water Infrastructure
Project
1,149,000
51 | P a g e
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CO
Town of Cheraw for a Regional Consolidation Project
1,625,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CO
Town of Superior for Granular Activated Carbon
System at Water Treatment Plant
1,280,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CO
City of Aurora for a Waterline Replacement Program
2,800,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CO
Town of Minturn for a Water Treatment Plant
2,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CO
City ofNorthglenn for Water Treatment Plant
Improvements
2,329,600
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CT
School Hill Water Association for Clean Water for the
School Hill Association
1,200,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CT
The South Central Regional Water Authority for Lake
Gaillard Water Treatment Plant HVAC and Electrical
Improvements
2,647,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CT
The South Central Regional Water Authority for
Seymour Well Treatment Facility Generator
Replacement
716,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CT
The Metropolitan District Commission for Northeast
Transmission Water Main
2,500,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
CT
Norwich Public Utilities for Poquetanuck Cove
Crossing Water Interconnect
800,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
DE
City of Dover for Water Main Extension and New Well
1,800,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
FL
City of Fort Myers Water Treatment Expansion Plan
2,500,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
FL
Town of Lantana for a Water Main Repair Project
1,200,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
FL
Village of Pinecrest Waterline Lateral Connection
Project
640,000
52 | P a g e
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
FL
DeSoto County for the Restoration of Shoreline Off the
Peace River in DeSoto County
2,500,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
FL
Lee County for the North Lee County Wellfield
Expansion Project
2,400,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
FL
City of Hollywood for Membrane Softening Drinking
Water Upgrades
3,452,972
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
GA
City of Byron for Walker Road Drinking Water
Improvement
651,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
GA
Augusta-Richmond County for Water Line Evaluation
1,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
GA
City of Keysville for Water Supply and Water Source
Lines
197,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
GA
Gwinnett County for Replacement and Upgrade of Aged
Water Distribution Mains
2,988,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
GA
City of East Point for a Water Main Upgrade Project
1,600,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
HI
County of Hawai'i for North Kona Deep Well
2,080,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
HI
County of Hawaii for Large Water Meter Replacement
80,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
IL
City of Chicago for Daycare Lead Service Line
Replacement
1,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
IL
City of Edwardsville for Cass Avenue Water Main
Replacement
500,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
IL
Village of Ivesdale for Water Main Improvements
250,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
IL
Villages of Bedford Park & Lemont for Water
Connection Project
500,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
IL
City of Centralia for Water Line Replacement
500,000
53 | P a g e
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
IL
City of Quincy for Lead Service Line Replacement
400,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
IL
DuPage County for York Township Drinking Water
Project
300,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
IL
City of Waukegan for Lead Service Line Replacement
500,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
IL
City of Lewistown for a Municipal Water Supply
Project
600,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
IL
City of Litchfield Drinking Water Distribution System
Improvements Phase I & II
2,284,429
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
IL
City of Greenville Drinking Water Treatment Plant
Construction
750,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
IL
City of Pana Drinking Water Transmission Main
Replacement
1,881,600
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
IL
Sharpsburg & Neighboring Area Water System—Rural
Water Distribution System Phase 3
690,750
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
IL
City of Joliet for a Design and Development Project
3,452,972
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
IL
Village of Roberts Emergency Water Infrastructure
Needs
90,400
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
IL
Village of Manhattan for Well 7 Improvements and
Radium Reduction Treatment Project
3,452,972
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
IL
Village of Midlothian for the 149th Street & Pulaski
Road Water Main Replacement
1,064,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
IL
Village of Skokie for Lead Service Line Replacement
Project
2,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
IL
City of Waukegan for a Water Works Improvement
Project
3,452,972
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
IL
Village of Oswego for Corrosion Studies
1,800,000
54 | Page
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
KS
Kansas City Board of Public Utilities for Aged Water
Line Replacement
10,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
KY
City of Lawrenceburg Water System Improvements
Project
2,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
KY
Nicholas County Water District—Phase 13 Water
System Improvements
1,548,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
KY
City of Stanton Water Improvements Project
640,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
KY
Lebanon Waterworks Company Tank Project
1,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
KY
Daviess County Water District Waterline Upgrade
640,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
KY
Letcher County Water and Sewer District Water System
Improvements
3,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
KY
City of Hazard Buckhorn Water Treatment Plant and
Transmission Line Project
2,500,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
LA
Town of Farmerville for Water Metering Project
560,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
LA
Jackson Parish Hospital for Potable Water System
750,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
LA
Natchitoches Regional Medical Center for Natchitoches
Regional Medical System Potable Water System
1,120,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
LA
West Calcasieu Cameron Hospital Water Booster
Station (100,000 GPD Avg. Demand) Project
2,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
MA
City of Gardner for Gardner Water Transmission Main
1,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
MA
Town of Sharon for a PFAS Water Treatment Plant
Project
3,452,972
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
MA
Town of Millis for a Water Supply PFAS Treatment
Planning, Design, Construction Project
3,452,972
55 | P a g e
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
MA
Town of Somerset for a Hot & Cold Lane Tank THM
Removal System
3,200,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
MA
Town of Mansfield for the PFAS Treatment for
Dustin/Prescott Wells Project
2,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
MA
Town of Burlington for the Mill Pond PFAS Filter
Facility
1,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
MA
Town of Winchendon for the Central Street Water Main
Replacement and Upgrade Project
494,950
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
MD
City of Westminster for Advanced Water Purification
System
2,945,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
MD
Town of North East for Leslie Water Treatment Plant
500,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
MD
Charles County for WSSC Waldorf Interconnection
250,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
MD
City of Westminster for a Water Main Replacement at
Route 27
2,150,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
ME
Gray Water District for Maine Turnpike Crossing Water
Main Replacement
1,416,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
ME
City of Calais for Calais Well and Generator
Replacement
576,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
ME
Baileyville Utilities District for Palm Street Waterline
Replacement
1,592,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
ME
Stonington Water Company for Stonington Water
Storage Tank Construction
1,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
ME
Anson-Madison Sanitary District for Anson- Madison
Regional PFAS Treatment Facility
500,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
ME
Town of Limerick for a Water and Sewer Mains
Replacement Project
1,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
MI
City of Benton Harbor for Water System Improvements
800,000
56 | P a g e
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
MI
Oakland County for Royal Oak Township Water System
Improvements
1,600,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
MI
City ofHamtramck for Water System Improvements
3,452,972
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
MI
Bruce Township 33 Mile Road & McVicar Water Main
Connection Project
1,600,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
MI
City of Richmond Main Street Water Main Replacement
(Division to CN RR)
943,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
MI
Village of Almont W. & E. St. Clair Road
Reconstruction/Water Main & Sewer Replacement
Project
3,950,800
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
MI
Township of Clay M—29 Water Main Replacement
Project
2,500,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
MI
City of St. Clair Water Tower/Booster Station Project
1,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
MI
City of Clawson for a Water Main Reconstruction
Project
710,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
MI
City of Jackson for the Hupp-Morrell Water
Transmission Connector
4,240,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
MI
City of Jackson for a M—50 Water Transmission Main
5,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
MN
City of Cologne for Water Tower Repair
500,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
MN
City of Woodbury for Water Main Replacement Project
468,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
MN
City of Beaver Bay for Water Intake Repair Project
432,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
MN
City of Otsego for Drinking Water Treatment
Improvements
3,400,000
57 | P a g e
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
MN
City of Lafayette for Water Treatment Project
1,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
MN
City of Woodbury for a East Wellfield Manifold Pipe
Project
3,452,972
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
MN
City of Plymouth for Zachary Water Treatment Plant
Enhancements
2,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
MN
City of Aitkin Regional Water Tower Upgrade
2,320,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
MN
City of Aurora—East Mesabi Water Project
4,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
MO
City of Springfield for Booster Pump Station
14,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
MO
City of St. Charles for Well Replacement
2,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
MO
City of Brookfield Drinking Water Project
1,240,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
MO
City of Republic Water Tower Project
5,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
MS
City of Byram for Water Supply Improvements
4,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
MS
City of Ridgeland Water and Wastewater Infrastructure
Improvements
3,500,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
MS
Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians Tucker Potable
Water Treatment Plant Project
2,400,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
MS
City of Jackson—General Filter Repairs at the J.H.
Fewell Water Treatment Plant
2,800,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
MS
Town of Brooksville Water and Wastewater
Infrastructure Improvements
2,500,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
MS
Town of Leakesville Jernigan Water Main Extension
1,826,424
58 | P a g e
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
MS
City of Gulfport Northwood Water Main Replacement
1,600,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NC
City of Oxford for the Kerr Lake Regional Water
Treatment Plant Improvement Project
3,452,972
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NC
Town of Hillsborough for a Water Booster Pump
Station
1,267,500
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NC
City of Sanford for Triangle Regional Governments
Water Treatment Plant Improvements
3,326,400
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NC
Sampson County Expansion of Water Treatment
Facilities
1,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NH
Town of Jaffrey for Water Main Replacement
1,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NH
Town of Winchester for Pump Station and Water Main
2,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NH
City of Dover for a Regional Emergency Drinking
Water Distribution Interconnection
3,452,972
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NJ
Keyport Borough for Water Main Replacement and
Upgrade Project
2,347,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NJ
City of Cape May for Drinking Water Treatment Plant
Expansion
600,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NJ
Town of Dover for Lead Service Line Replacement
Project
250,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NJ
Borough of Fair Lawn for a Water Treatment Facility
Project
3,452,972
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NJ
Township of Mahwah for a Water Department Filtration
System
800,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NJ
Borough of Park Ridge for a Water Remediation Project
3,452,972
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NJ
Moorestown Township for the Kings Highway/Main
Street Water Main Replacement
2,240,000
59 | P a g e
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NJ
Willingboro Municipal Utilities Authority for the Well
5A PFOS Treatment System Upgrade
3,452,972
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NJ
Borough ofNetcong for Water Service Line
Replacements
600,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NJ
Borough of Flemington for Potable Water Well #11
1,200,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NJ
Borough of Alpha for a Elevated Water Storage
Replacement Project
3,320,561
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NJ
City of Garfield for a Lead Piping Removal and
Replacement Project
2,400,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NJ
Morris County Parks Commission for the Boonton
Reservoir Improvement Project
600,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NJ
Township of Montclair for PFOAS and Perchlorate
Treatment — Rand Well
2,056,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NJ
City of Elizabeth for Replacement of Known Lead
Service Lines
2,170,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NJ
Lower Township Municipal Utilities Authority—North
Cape May Watermain Replacement
1,953,918
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NM
Village of Cimarron for Waterline Replacement
700,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NM
City of Gallup for New Water Wells
1,300,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NM
Town of Springer for Water Distribution System
Improvements
1,265,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NM
City of Santa Rosa for Water System Improvements
800,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NV
City of North Las Vegas for Robinson Well Rehab
2,500,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NV
Virgin Valley Water District for Arsenic Treatment
Plant
3,040,000
60 | P a g e
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NV
City of Ely for Lower East Ely Water Mains Upgrade
2,430,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NV
Truckee Meadows Water Authority Spanish Springs
Nitrate and Arsenic Treatment Plant
3,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NV
Moapa Valley Water District for Water Transmission
Line Replacement
2,476,640
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NV
Virgin Valley Water District for Water Line
Replacement
2,660,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NY
City of Syracuse for Intake No.2 Extension
1,500,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NY
Village of Cuba for Water System Improvements
1,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NY
City of Long Beach for Water Mains Replacement
1,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NY
Village of Kiryas Joel for Phase II Water Treatment
Facility Improvements
1,500,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NY
Town of Hempstead for an East Meadow Dioxane
Mitigation Project
5,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NY
Genesee County Water Security and Resiliency North
Water Storage Tank Project
2,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NY
Cayuga County Water and Sewer Authority Installation
of an Alternate Water Connection in the Town of
Sennett
560,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NY
Town of Newburgh for the Colden Park Watermain
Replacement Project Phase III
3,452,972
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NY
Town of Putnam Valley for a Potable Watermain and
Treatment Plant Installation Project
2,800,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NY
City of Middletown for Water Systems Improvement
Phase III Project
3,452,972
61 | P a g e
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NY
Village of Freeport for Security Improvements to Water
Operations
240,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NY
Town of Beekmantown Drinking Water Remediation
750,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NY
Town of Ticonderoga for Route 74 Neighborhood Water
Source and Distribution
4,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NY
Town of Schuyler Falls Morrisonville Water District
Improvements
2,562,500
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NY
City of Glen Cove for Installation of Packed Tower
Aeration System at Duck Pond Road Well Station
3,452,972
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NY
Town of Schuyler—Graham, Newport, and Brown Road
Water District Project
1,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NY
Town of Orwell Water System Improvements
2,351,200
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NY
City of Norwich Water Main Replacement
2,850,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NY
Village of Fultonville for Drinking Water Upgrades
Project
45,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NY
Suffolk County Water Authority Calverton Connection
Project (South River Road)
5,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
NY
Town of Riverhead Clean Water Project
2,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
OH
Ironton for Water Main Extension and Booster Station
Improvements Project
2,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
OH
Cleveland Water for Potable Water System Upgrade
1,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
OH
Southwest Licking Community Water and Sewer
District 161 Water Tower Project
2,134,300
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
OH
Village of Seville Water Transmission Main
Replacement
1,000,000
62 | P a g e
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
OH
Village of Adena Water Meter Replacement Project
174,240
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
OH
City of Toronto Walton Acres Phase 1 Waterline
Improvement Project
600,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
OH
Geauga County Board of County Commissioners
Services Center Water System Upgrade
520,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
OH
City of Portsmouth Water Treatment Plant
4,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
OK
City of Waurika for Improvements to Water Treatment
Plant
3,892,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
OK
McCurtain County for Water Line Replacement
4,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
OK
Town of Maysville for Improvements to Water
Treatment Plant
4,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
OK
City of Oilton for Improvements to Water Treatment
Plant
80,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
OK
City of Barnsdall for Improvements to Water Treatment
Plant
880,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
OK
Cleveland County for Water System Extension
4,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
OK
City of Watonga for Improvements to Water Treatment
Plant
2,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
OK
City of Lawton for Alternate Groundwater Supply
4,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
OK
City of Edmond Water Treatment Plant Expansion
5,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
OK
City of Seminole Water Tower Replacement
4,351,281
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
OR
City of Falls City for Water System Project
1,600,000
63 | P a g e
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
OR
City of Burns for Water System Improvements
3,500,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
OR
City of Prairie City for Water Distribution System
Improvements
602,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
OR
City of Redmond for Water System Construction
2,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
OR
City of Grants Pass for Water Treatment Plant
Relocation Project
2,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
OR
City of Paisley for Water System Improvements
2,820,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
OR
Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs for the Warm
Springs Public Water System Drinking Water
Infrastructure including through an interagency
agreement with the Indian Health Service
5,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
OR
Tualatin Valley Water District for the Willamette Water
Supply System Construction Project
3,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
PA
Meadville Area Water Authority for Tank Rehab
390,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
PA
Municipal Water Authority of Aliquippa for Water
Distribution System Improvements
500,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
PA
Ashland Area Municipal Authority for S.R. 61
Waterline Replacement Project
416,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
PA
Albert Gallatin Municipal Authority for Distribution
System Expansion
500,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
PA
Redbank Valley Municipal Authority for Water System
Improvements
500,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
PA
East Dunkard Water Authority Waterline System
2,734,400
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
RI
Town of Jamestown Water for Transmission and
Distribution Line Replacement Project
2,500,000
64 | Page
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
RI
Providence Water Supply Board for Cybersecurity
Protection
212,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
RI
Providence Water Supply Board for Lead Service Line
Replacement
2,288,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
SC
Greenville Water for Adkins Water Transmission Main
Line Project
5,400,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
SC
City of Aiken for Shaws Creek Water Treatment Plant
4,500,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
TN
City of Oak Ridge Water Treatment Plan Transmission
Main
5,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
TN
Town of Tellico Plains Water Treatment Plant
800,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
TX
City of West University Place for the Milton Street
Waterline Replacement Project
2,500,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
TX
San Antonio Water Systems Generators for Critical
Infrastructure Protection Project
2,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
UT
Jordan Valley Water Conservancy District Emergency
Drinking Water
2,873,120
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
UT
Herriman City Water Line Replacement
3,243,520
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
UT
Kearns Improvement District Water Infrastructure
Project
1,760,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
UT
Tooele City Corporation—Tooele Valley Water Well
and Storage Project
4,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
VA
Rockbridge County for Raw Water Pumping Station
3,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
VA
Spotsylvania County for the Motts Run Water
Treatment Plant Expansion Project
3,452,972
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
VT
Town of Randolph for North Wells and Reservoir
Project
775,000
65 | P a g e
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
VT
City of Barre for Route 302 Water Main Replacement
2,240,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
VT
Royalton Fire District 1 for Water Improvement Projects
670,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
WA
City of West Richland for Flat Top Community Park
Well Replacement and Hazard Elimination
2,500,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
WA
Public Utility District #1 of Wahkiakum County for
Puget Island Water System Mainline Improvement
Project
261,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
WA
Cowlitz County for Shadow Mountain Water System
Extension and Booster Pump Station
1,500,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
WA
City of Bridgeport for Water System Improvements
751,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
WA
City of Pomeroy for Water System Improvements
436,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
WA
Public Utility District No. 1 of Skamania County—
Carson Water Treatment Plant Rebuild
3,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
WA
Skagit Public Utility District for the Alger Interstate 5
Waterline Relocation
2,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
WA
Town of Winthrop Watermain Reconstruction
667,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
WA
City of Issaquah for the Aquifer Project
600,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
WA
Muckleshoot Tribe for a Water System Improvements
Project
3,452,972
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
WI
Town of Campbell for PFAS Remediation in Drinking
Water Wells
1,666,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
WI
Rib Mountain Sanitary District for Drinking Water Plant
and PFAS Mitigation
1,667,000
66 | P a g e
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
WI
City of Park Falls for Water and Sewer Aging
Infrastructure Improvements
1,667,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
WI
Eau Claire Waterworks for Drinking Water
Infrastructure
1,666,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
WI
Town of Peshtigo for Safe Drinking Water
Infrastructure
1,667,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
WI
City of Wausau for Drinking Water PFAS Response
Project
1,667,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
WI
City of Milwaukee for a Clean Water Initiative
3,452,972
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
WI
Village of New Glarus for a Water Tower Project
1,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
WV
Ravenswood for Sewage Treatment Plant
3,500,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
WV
Union for Pickaway Waterline Extension
400,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
WV
Logan Water Department for Alternate Source Water
500,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
WV
Berkeley County Public Service Water District for
Bunker Hill Water Mainline Upgrade
3,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
WV
Keyser for Water Treatment Plant and System
Improvements
8,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
WV
City of Mannington for Water Meter Upgrades
229,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
WV
Branchland Midkiff PSD for Kentucky Fork of 4 Mile
Creek Water Extension
370,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
WV
Gilmer County PSD for Waterline Extension Upgrade
350,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
WV
Marshall County Commission Grand Vue Park
Waterline Replacement
410,438
67 | P a g e
-------
STAG Account
State
Project
(Recipient Name and Purpose)
Amount ($)
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
WV
Town of Newburg Independence Water Supply Line
Project
2,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
WV
Town of Triadelphia Village of Valley Grove Water
System Improvements
5,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
WV
Kingwood Water Works (WISDOM Project)
4,000,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
WV
Town of Harrisville Mellin Ridge Water Line Extension
400,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
WV
Wyoming County Commission Hanover Waterline
Extension
450,000
STAG—Drinking Water
State Revolving Fund
WV
New Haven Public Service District Old Gwinn Road
Water Main Extension
1,000,000
68 | P a g e
-------
Appendix C: Technical Corrections-Procedural Information
Examples of Acceptable Technical Corrections
Below are three common types of corrections that are generally acceptable. All examples assume
concurrence from the original recipient and the new recipient to be named, if applicable.
Original Language
Purpose (P) or
Recipient (R)?
New Language
Anytown for wastewater
infrastructure improvements
P
Anytown for water infrastructure
improvements
Anytown for wastewater
infrastructure improvements
R
Greater Anytown-Area Regional
Sewer Authority for wastewater
infrastructure improvements
Anytown for wastewater
infrastructure improvements
P,R
Greater Anytown-Area Regional
Water Authority for drinking water
infrastructure improvements
Technical corrections cannot: 1) change the purpose to a non-construction project unless it
otherwise provides for water quality protection; 2) change the purpose to construction of
infrastructure that is not drinking, waste, or stormwater-related unless it otherwise provides for
water quality protection; 3) change the purpose to debt repayment; or 4) transfer funds to another
Federal Agency.
Who Can Request a Technical Correction?
Technical correction requests must be in writing and, for a change in purpose, must be originated
by the original recipient. A request involving a change in recipient can be initiated by either the
original recipient or the new entity to be named, but such a request requires the written
concurrence of the other party. Requests involving a change in both recipient and purpose can
also be initiated by either entity with concurrence from the other; however, the original earmark
recipient must specifically acknowledge both the change in purpose and the change in recipient
in their concurrence. Any request for technical corrections from parties other than the original
recipient or the new entity will generally not be considered.
Procedure for Making a Technical Correction
Recipients requesting a technical correction should first consult their EPA Regional Contact to
discuss the need for, and evaluate the appropriateness of, a technical correction. When
appropriate and necessary, the EPA Regional Office will submit technical corrections to EPA
Headquarters for consultation with and resolution by Congress.
69 | P a g e
-------
EPA Regional Offices provide all written requests that are consistent with this Guidance to EPA
Headquarters for review and submission to the Agency's Liaison to the House and Senate
Committees on Appropriations ("Appropriations Liaison"). The Appropriations Liaison initiates
consultation with the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations. EPA approves proposed
corrections after the Appropriations Liaison transmits confirmation of consultation with the
Committees.12 EPA may then proceed with administering projects within the scope of approved
corrected language.
When a Technical Correction is Unnecessary
All changes in the project purpose require a technical correction. All changes in the recipient
require a technical correction unless the intended recipient is an agency of the original recipient
or is wholly owned or controlled by the recipient (e.g., the recipient is listed as Anytown, USA,
but the intended recipient is the Anytown Department of Water Quality). In such cases, a grant
may be made to the intended recipient without a technical correction.
Withdrawing or Reversing a Technical Correction
Technical corrections requests that have been approved by EPA can be reversed (i.e., reverted to
the original appropriation language). Reversing a technical correction requires a new technical
correction following the procedures outlined above. Technical corrections requests that have not
been approved by EPA Headquarters can be withdrawn. Withdrawal procedures depend on how
far along the request went in the Congressional consultation process.
• If the request has not yet been provided to Congress for consultation, the request will
simply be removed from the submission list. Upon confirmation from EPA Headquarters
that the request was removed, the Region can proceed under the scope of the original
language.
• If the request has been sent to Congress for consultation, but not yet returned, EPA
Headquarters will request its removal from consideration and will notify the Region when
they can proceed under the scope of the original language.
• If the consultation process was already completed, EPA will send the language reversal
back to Congress in a subsequent request.
Administering a Technically Corrected Project
Technical corrections made under the technical corrections authority should be administered in
accordance with the guidance document from the fiscal year of appropriation.
12 If the circumstances surrounding a technical correction for a particular project change after consultation with the
Committees and EPA decides not to approve the request, EPA will notify the Committees in a subsequent request.
70 | P a g e
-------
Appendix D: Application Forms and Attachments
The following registration steps must be completed prior to submitting an application
package:
~ Registration in SAM.gov. Unique Entity Identifiers (UEIs) are assigned during the
SAM.gov registration process. Recipients with active SAM.gov registrations prior to April 2022
automatically have a UEI but may need to complete entity validation within SAM.gov.
Recipients must be registered in SAM.gov. Recipients may refer to the Entity Registration
Checklist and obtain SAM.gov assistance via the Federal Service Desk at 1-866-606-8220 or
fsd.gov (M-F 8am-8pm ET).
~ Registration in Grants.gov. Once registered in SAM.gov, recipients who have a SAM.gov
registration can then register with Grants.gov and assign Grants.gov Roles. Please note that only
an Authorized Organization Representative (AOR) can submit an application on behalf of the
recipient.
Grants.gov instructions, and Training Resources & Videos are available online.
Grants.gov assistance is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week at 1-800-518-4726 or
support@grants.gov (closed on federal holidays).
Complete application packages must be submitted through Grants.gov and must include
the following:
1. ~ Application for Federal Assistance (SF 424) with authorized signatures submitted.
2. ~ Additional information for SF424, Block #19 (if applicable): Is
application subject to review by State under Executive Order 12372 Process?
Select the appropriate box. If box "a" is selected, enter the date the application
was submitted to the State SPOC (generally, applicants must submit the SF424
or summary thereof to the State SPOC to meet the requirements under
Executive Order 12372).
• California. All EPA programs and activities subject to
Intergovernmental Review have been selected for State Single Point of
Contact (SPOC) review. Community Grant Applications for projects in
California should be submitted to the California SPOC at
state.clearinghouse@opr.ca.gov.
• Utah. Only applications for EPA financial assistance subject to
Intergovernmental Review submitted by Utah state agencies have been
selected for SPOC review. Applications by local governments, nonprofit
organizations and other entities are not reviewed by the Utah SPOC.
Utah state agencies are to submit their Community Grant applications to
stategrants@utah. gov.
71 | P a g e
-------
No other SPOCs have selected EPA programs and activities subject to
Intergovernmental Review for SPOC review, however there may be
requirements for submission of Federal grant applications to SPOCs or other
state agencies based on state law that are independent of 40 CFRPart 29. EPA
encourages applicants to comply with state requirements but does not enforce
those requirements.
• Intergovernmental Review SPOC List provides contact information for each
SPOC.
• Fact sheet for Applicants Intergovernmental Review Process provides additional
information on Intergovernmental Review.
~ Budget Information for Non-Construction Programs (SF 424A).
~ Budget Detail-Breakdown by Object Class Categories.
RAIN-2019-G02 at https://www.epa.gov/grants/rain-2019-g02
• Costs for hiring construction contractors would be reflected in SF 424A Category g
"Construction."
• Costs for building or repairing facilities and related demolition and site preparation
work or for remediating contamination are to be classified as SF424A Category g
"Construction."
• Costs for hiring Architectural and Engineering firms for design/project management
services would be categorized in SF 424A Category f "Contractual."
• Construction activities carried out by the applicant's own employees ("force
account") are to be classified as SF 424A Category a "Personnel."
• Information on cost allowability is provided in 2 CFR Part 200. Subpart E. Recipients
may review EPA's training course on budget development. EPA reviews costs
included in project budgets as part of the application/pre award process to ensure they
conform with general principles of cost allowability:
o A cost is eligible if it is permitted by statute, program guidance, or regulations,
o A cost is reasonable if it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a
prudent person under the circumstances prevailing at the time the decision was
made to incur the cost,
o Costs must be allocable: costs must be incurred either directly or indirectly to
carry out the project and must be charged proportionately across all benefitting
cost centers.
o Costs must be necessary for the project being funded.
Allowable costs are:
o Adequately documented.
o Conform to limitations of laws, regulations, etc. and grant terms and conditions,
o Consistent with recipient's policies/procedures - same factors apply to both
federal and non-federal activities,
o Accorded to consistent treatment - a cost may not be assigned as direct if a
similar cost incurred for the same purpose has been allocated as an indirect cost.
Page
-------
o Not included as a cost or used to meet a matching requirement for any other
federal grant.
o Consistent with generally accepted accounting principles
4. ~ Use the Project Narrative Attachment Form to submit the Workplan. The
workplan should include tasks, milestones, and expected environmental results or
outcomes (See Appendix E).
5. ~ Use the Other Attachments Form to submit the Current Indirect Cost Rate
Negotiation Agreement. If applicable, include Rate and Signature pages (i.e.,
Sections 1 and 3) of the approved Indirect Cost Rate Agreement with application.
EPA Policy on Indirect Rate Costs (IDC) effective 10/1/2018, RAIN-2018-G02.
Prior to drawing down EPA funds for IDCs, and/or using unrecovered IDCs as cost-
share, recipients must have an approved rate and an EPA- approved budget that
includes IDCs.
• IDCs are those that are nor readily identifiable with a particular activity but are
necessary to the general operation of the recipient organization and the conduct of
the proposed project (such as general administration expenses).
6. ~ EPA Key Contacts Form (EPA Form 5700-4).
7. ~ Pre-Award Compliance Review Report (EPA Form 4700-4), current form with
authorized signature. See Tips for Completing EPA Form 4700-4.
8. ~ Use the Other Attachments Form to submit the Certification Regarding
Lobbying (EPA Form 6600-06) with authorized signature. All applicants, including
Tribes, are required to submit this certification if the total federal dollar awarded to the
applicant/recipient is greater than $100,000 for the life of the grant.
9. ~ Use the Other Attachments Form to submit the Disclosure of Lobbying
Activities (Form SF-LLL), with authorized signature attached with the grant
application package. For all other applicants, form is required for reporting entity,
whether subawardee or prime federal recipient, at the initiation or receipt of a
covered federal action, or a material change to a previous filing, pursuant to Title 31
U.S.C Section 1352. Used by applicants to disclose lobbying activities that have
been secured to influence the outcome of a federal grant action.
73 | P a g e
-------
Accessing the Application Package
NOTE: Do not use the "SEARCH" bar located at the top right of the Grants.gov webpage
to find Application Packages.
To locate Application Package:
1. Go to directly to the funding opportunit onGrants.gov.
2. In the "Package" tab, scroll down the page to locate Assistance Listing Number 66.202 (listed
under the column heading "CFDA") for the application package.
VIEW OPPORTUNITY
EPA-CEP-01
EPA Mandatory Grant Programs
Environmental Protection Agency
SYNOPSIS I VERSION HISTORY I RELATED DOCUMENTS
Select Grant Opportunity Package
Print Package List
PLEASE READ BEFORE APPLYING!
If you view and complete your application package using Granls.gov downloadable PDF forms, you MUST have Adobe Reader installed. You may receive a validation error using incompatible
versions of Adobe Reader. To prevent a validation error, it is now recommended you uninstall any earlier versions of Adobe Reader and install the latest compatible version of Adobe Reader.
If more than one person is working on the PDF forms, ALL applicants must be using the same Adobe Reader version. Click for more information on Adobe Reader Compatibility.
Opportunity Packagers) Currently Available for this Funding Opportunity:
CFDA
Competition ID
Competitor Title
Opportunity Package ID
Opening Date
Closing Date
Actions
66.001
PKG00213703
10/04/2030
Preview | Apply
66.032
PKG00214049
10/04/2030
Preview | Apply
66.034
PKG00214050
10/04/2030
Preview | Apply
66.038
PKG00214051
10/04/2030
Preview | Apply
66 040
PKG00214052
10/04/2030
Preview | Apply
66.042
PKG00214046
10/04/2030
Preview | Apply
66121
PKG00214Q48
10/04/2030
Preview | Apply
66.124
PKG00214043
10/04/2030
Preview | Apply
66.125
PKG00214045
10/04/2030
Preview | Apply
66.202
PKG00214047
10/04/2030
Preview | Apply
66.418
PKG00214053
10/04/2030
Preview | Apply
REMINDERS:
• Do NOT use the "SEARCH" bar located at the top right of the Grants.gov
screen to find Application Packages. Follow the instructions above.
• Recipients must ensure appropriate role(s) and access in Grants.gov Workspace are
assigned within recipient entity as applicable; each entity's EBiz point of contact
(POO is the person that authorizes or assigns Grants.gov roles. Additional
information on Grants.gov role assignment is available online.
• There are a series of automated emails generated by Grants.gov during the
application submission process. See sample email below.
• Obtain a Tracking Number from Grants.gov Support technicians when contacting the
Grants.gov Support Center for assistance. This Tracking Number is used to help
ensure your issue(s) is fully addressed.
74 | Page
-------
Please contact the Grants.gov Support Center by phone (1-800-518-4726) or email
(support@grants.gov) for technical support or questions. Help is available 24 hours a
day, 7 days a week, excluding federal holidays.
ALERT: It is important to read the automated emails generated by Grants.gov as the messages
provide application status updates during the submission process. Below is a sample automated
email indicating that an application has been sent to the funding agency with an assigned
tracking number.
Sample Grants.gov Email - Application Sent To Fundine
Agency
From: DoNotReply:S:grants.gov
Sent: Tuesday. December 25,
2012 4:32 AM
To: JaneDoe@happycamp.org
Subject: GRANT12345678 Grants.goy Agency Tracking Number Assignment for Application
Grantor agency has assigned the following Agency Tracking Number to your application:
e9466bf2-797a-4cfc-b013 -7bb69600 lc 1 bGRANT 1234567 8.
You will need the Agency Tracking Number when corresponding with the Grantor agency about your application.
Use the Grants.gov Tracking Number at Grants.gov to check your application's status and to review your Agency
Tracking Number:
Type: GRANT
Grants.gov Tracking Number: GRANT12345678
DUNS Number: 9876543210000
AOR name: Jane Doe
Application Name: Clean Environment Grant Program
Opportunity Number: EPA-CEP-01
Opportunity- Name: EPA Mandatory Grant Programs
Thank you.
Grants.gov
If you have questions, please contact the Grants.gov Contact Center: support@grants. gov 1-800-518-4726
24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Closed on federal holidays.
PLEASE NOTE: This email is for notification purposes only. Please do not reply to this email for any purpose.
75 | P a g e
-------
Appendix E: Community Grants Workplan Contents/Outline
Name of Applicant and Project Title
Project Objective(s) and Need
Narrative, how project will resolve need/purpose.
Project Description
Narrative, maps, photographs, relevant design parameters etc. Clearly defined scope of
work, outlining all activities to be performed under the grant; detailed description of the
proposed project, summary of deliverables. Framework for managing the project,
explanation of the approach, procedures, and controls for ensuring that awarded grant
funds will be expended in a timely and efficient manner, evaluating performance and
reporting progress toward achieving the expected outputs and outcomes. How
tasks/activities will be undertaken. The scope of work must be in conformance with the
project description. Budget narrative that links the budget to workplan tasks activities
and includes source(s) of non-federal cost share.
Milestone Schedule
Narrative or tabular depiction of each grant activity's estimated start and end dates,
interim milestones, deliverables, and project completion. The length of the grant award
project period should be consistent with the milestone schedule.
Environmental Results/Benefits
Narrative or tabular linkage of each grant activity with the applicable EPA Strategic Plan
goal and objective (i.e. EPA's FY2022 - FY2026 Strategic Plan Goal 5: Ensure Clean
and Safe Water for All Communities, Objective 5.1: Ensure Safe Drinking Water and
Reliable Water Infrastructure), anticipated environmental results, anticipated
environmental outputs, and anticipated environmental outcomes.
• Outputs: environmental activities, efforts, and/or associated work products related to
environmental goals or objectives, that will be produced or provided over a period of
time or by a specified date. Outputs should be well-defined and may be quantitative
or qualitative but must be measurable during an assistance agreement funding period.
• Outcomes: the results, effects or consequences that will occur from carrying out an
environmental program or activity that is related to an environmental or
programmatic goal or objective. Outcomes should be well-defined to the maximum
extent practicable, and may be environmental, behavioral, health-related, or
programmatic in nature, must be quantitative, and may not necessarily be achievable
within an assistance agreement funding period.
Workplan Requirements for Identifying Contractors
Contractual selection must comply with the competitive Procurement Standards set forth
in 2 CFR 200.317 - 2 CFR 200.327. EPA's Contracts and Subawards solicitation clause
provides more information about partnerships, and the Best Practice Guide for Procuring
76 | P a g e
-------
Services. Supplies, and Equipment Under EPA Assistance Agreements can assist
community project recipients in complying with procurement requirements. In general,
all procurement transactions for professional engineering services and construction
contractors must be conducted in a manner that promotes fair and open competition from
an adequate number of qualified sources. 2 CFR 200.320 discusses the specific methods
of procurement to be followed and the circumstances under which each method can be
used.
Workplan Requirements for Identifying Subrecipients
Any proposed subawards must comply with regulatory standards as implemented in
EPA's Subaward Policy. In almost all cases, for-profit firms and individual consultants
are not proper subrecipients. For-profit firms and individual consultants would more
likely be considered contractors.
77 | P a g e
-------
Appendix F: Grant Policies and Resources
Grants Management Training for Applicants and Recipients
• EPA's online training courses are free and are designed to introduce potential EPA grant
recipients to key aspects of the entire grant lifecycle, from preparation of an application
through grant closeout.
• Information on EPA Form 4700-4 is available online, see Tips for Completing EPA Form
4700-4
EPA Grant Policies
• EPA grant policies may affect how recipients manage and administer EPA assistance
agreements.
Budget Development
• Community Grant recipients may refer to Interim General Budget Development
Guidance for Applicants and Recipients of EPA Financial Assistance to learn more about
cost eligibility and preparation of the budget component of the application package.
Selected Items of Cost
EPA POs and grant specialists review costs included in project budgets as part of the application.
Allowability of costs is based on several factors specified in 2 CFR Part 200. Subpart E.
EPA's Guidance on Selected Items of Cost for Recipients provides information on the
allowability of specific costs.
Environmental Review
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires evaluation of how federal grant actions
may affect the quality of the environment. Under NEPA, environmental impacts must be
considered before EPA can award the grant.
• The Categorical Exclusion (CATEX) Checklist provides information on assessing
whether a project may be considered for a CATEX. EPA's list of actions that can be
categorically excluded is contained within 40 CFR Part 6 Subpart B. EPA makes
CATEX determinations based on its own regulations and can use information collected as
part of another federal agency's NEPA process. Recipients having a CATEX
determination resulting from another agency's NEPA review of their project may provide
that information to EPA as part of any request for a CATEX.
The following tools may be used to support development of Environmental Information
Documents (EIDs).
• The sample EID Outline provides optional format and content on what to include in an
EID.
• The Infrastructure Task Force Preliminary Engineering Report provides a recommended
format for preliminary engineering reports (PER) for use when planning drinking water
and wastewater infrastructure.
78 | P a g e
-------
Procurement
• EPA's Best Practice Guide for Procuring Services. Supplies and Equipment Under EPA
Assistance Agreements describes the financial transactions covered by the competitive
procurement requirements and other rules you must follow when awarding and
administering EPA funded contracts.
• Community grant recipients must follow their own procurement procedures, which must
be documented and comply with State, local or tribal laws and regulation as well as
Federal laws and Uniform Grant Guidance (UGG) procurement regulations. Projects
inclusive of CWSRF-eligible activities, irrespective of whether such projects are co-
funded with CWSRF funding, must comply with the procurement processes for
architectural and engineering (A/E) services as identified in 40 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.. or an
equivalent State requirement.
Davis Bacon
• The Davis-Bacon Act requires that all contractors and subcontractors performing
construction, alteration, and repair (including painting and decorating) work under federal
contracts in excess of $2,000, pay their laborers and mechanics not less than the
prevailing wage and fringe benefits for the geographic location. Personnel costs include
salaries, wages, and allowable incentive compensation for recipient employees (i.e., who
receive W-2 forms) who spend time working on the project and are not subject to Davis
Bacon.
EPA's Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program
• EPA's DBE Program applies to all EPA Assistance Agreements and requires recipients
who procure goods and/or services to: employ the good faith efforts, document their
efforts and maintain DBE forms and other documentation from the prime contractor, and
report their procurement and DBE activities even if there isn't anything to report.
Build America, Buy America (BABA)
• Recipients are required to ensure that procurement plans comply with BABA
requirements prior to grants being awarded. Requirements call for all the iron, steel,
manufactured products, and construction materials used in the project to be produced in
the United States.
American Iron and Steel (AIS)
• The AIS provision requires recipients to use iron and steel products that are produced in
the United States for the construction, alteration, maintenance, or repair of a public water
system or treatment works. Compliance with AIS requirements correspond to for iron and
steel products will satisfy a subset of BABA requirements, (e.g., those pertaining to iron
and steel), however BABA also includes requirements pertaining to manufactured goods
and construction materials, which must also be met. Projects that are in compliance with
BABA are in compliance with AIS.
EPA Community Grants program
• The EPA Community Grants web page will be updated as new information
becomes available.
79 | P a g e
-------
Reporting waste, fraud, abuse, or other suspected violations of law
• The EPA Office of Inspector General is an independent oversight office charged with
preventing and detecting waste, fraud, and abuse by EPA and U.S. Chemical Safety and
Hazard Investigations Board employees, grantees, contractors, and others. It does this
through audits and investigations of Agency programs and operations, often in response
to complaints submitted to the OIG Hotline regarding alleged violations of law, needless
spending, or intentional deception.
• Suspected waste, fraud, abuse, or other violations of law can be reported anonymously or
confidentially to the OIG Hotline via phone at (888) 546-8740, email, or online form.
Listen to this podcast to learn more about the hotline.
Whistleblower Protection
• A whistleblower is a federal employee, an employee of a federal contractor,
subcontractor, grantee, or subgrantee or personal services contractor who discloses what
the individual believes to be evidence of a gross waste of federal funds, a substantial
danger to public health or safety, or any of the following related to a federal contract or
grant: gross mismanagement, abuse of authority, or other violation of law, rule, or
regulation.
• Because of the important public service these individuals perform when they come
forward, whistleblower protection laws prohibit reprisal against them, such as firing,
demotion, or other discrimination, and protect the identities of those who make
anonymous or confidential disclosures, such as via the OIG Hotline. Learn more about
Whistleblower Protection here.
80 | P a g e
------- |