TRI National Analysis 2017 www.epa.aov/trinationalanalysis/ March 2019 Introduction to the 2017 TRI National Analysis Industries and businesses in the United States (U.S.) use chemicals to make the products we depend on, such as pharmaceuticals, computers, paints, clothing, and automobiles. While the majority of chemicals included on the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI1 chemical list are managed by industrial facilities to minimize releases into the environment, releases do still occur as part of their normal business operations. It is your right to know what TRI chemicals are being used in your community, how they are managed, how much is released into the environment, and whether such quantities are increasing or decreasing over time. The TRI is a publicly available database maintained by EPA that tracks the management of certain chemicals. The information contained in the TRI is submitted by facilities in the U.S. in industry sectors such as manufacturing, metal mining, electric utilities, and commercial hazardous waste management. Under the Emergency Planning and Community Riqht-to-Know Act fEPCRAl. facilities must report details about their releases of TRI-listed chemicals for the prior calendar year to EPA by July 1 of each year. The Pollution Prevention Act fPPAl requires facilities to include in their report submissions information on pollution prevention and other waste management activities involving TRI chemicals. For calendar year 2017, more than 21,000 facilities submitted TRI data to EPA. Each year, EPA prepares and publishes the TRI National Analysis. In support of EPA's mission to protect human health and the environment, the TRI National Analysis summarizes recently submitted TRI data, explores data trends, and interprets the findings. Highlights from the 201 7 TRI data As an overview, the two charts below summarize the most recent TRI data on: 1) how chemical wastes were managed in 2017; and 2) how the portion of wastes that were disposed of or otherwise released were handled. vvEPA i ------- oEPA TRI National Analysis 2017 www.epa.aov/trinationalanalysis/ March 2019 Production-Related Waste Managed, 2017 30.57 billion pounds Disposed of or Otherwise Released: 13% Energy Recovery: 10% Recycled: 48% Total Disposal or Other Releases, 2017 3.88 billion pounds Off-site Disposal or Other Facilities reported managing 30.57 billion pounds of TRI-listed chemicals as production- related waste. This is the quantity of TRI chemicals in waste that is recycled, combusted for energy recovery, treated, disposed of, or otherwise released into the environment. In other words, it encompasses the TRI chemicals in waste generated from the production processes and operations of the facilities. o Of this total, 87% was recycled, combusted for energy recovery, or treated. Only 13% was disposed of or otherwise released into the environment. 2 ------- TRI National Analysis 2017 www.epa.gov/trinationalanalvsis/ March 2019 For chemical wastes that were disposed of or otherwise released, facilities also reported where the wastes were releasedto air, water, or land (on site or off site). Most waste was disposed of on site to land (including landfills, other land disposal, and underground injection). As highlighted in the Releases of Chemicals section, releases to air continued to decline in 2017. Since 2007, air releases reported to TRI have decreased by 57% (757 million pounds). Where are TRI Facilities Located? *>EPA Calgary Winnipeg MONT/ Montreal Orleans Mprterrey Met id j KSPUBUC IAWAICA 3 ------- v>EPA TRI National Analysis 2017 www.epa.aov/trinationalanalysis/ March 2019 What's in the 2017 TRI National Analysis The Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) National Analysis is prepared and published annually, and the 2017 TRI National Analysis is EPA's summary and interpretation of TRI data reported for activities that occurred at facilities in the U.S. during 2017. It offers valuable information for improving our understanding of how the environment and communities may be affected by TRI chemicals and is a snapshot of the data at one point in time. To conduct your own analysis of TRI data, use the most recent data available on the TRI Data and Tools webpaae. Additional information is presented in the following sections of the TRI National Analysis: Pollution Prevention and Waste Management presents the types of pollution prevention activities that facilities have implemented, and trends on recycling, energy recovery, treatment, and releases of TRI chemical waste generated and managed as part of industrial operations. Releases of Chemicals presents trends in releases of TRI chemicals to the air and water, and disposed of to land, including a focus on selected chemicals of special concern. Industry Sectors highlights TRI chemical waste management trends for five industry sectors: manufacturing, paint and coating manufacturing, chemical manufacturing, metal mining, and electric utilities. Where You Live presents analyses of the TRI data specific to U.S. geographic areas: state, city, county, ZIP code, metropolitan area and micropolitan area, and by Large Aquatic Ecosystems (LAEs), such as the Chesapeake Bay, as well as information about facilities in Indian Country. TRI and Beyond presents TRI data used in conjunction with data from other environmental programs, such as chemical production data reported to EPA under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). The use of TRI as a model for other pollutant release and transfer inventories around the world is also discussed in this section. 4 ------- TRI National Analysis 2017 www.epa.aov/trinationalanalysis/ March 2019 TRI Data Considerations As with any dataset, there are several factors to consider when reviewing results or using the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) data. Key factors associated with data presented in the TRI National Analysis are summarized below; for more information see Factors to Consider When Using Toxics Release Inventory Data. Covered sectors and chemicals. TRI includes information reported by many industry sectors on the quantities of many chemicals that are released or otherwise managed as waste, but it does not contain such information on all chemicals manufactured, processed or otherwise used by facilities or from facilities in all industry sectors within the United States. A list of the sectors covered bv the TRI Program is available on the TRI webpage, as well as a current list of the chemicals reportable to the TRI Program. TRI trends. The list of TRI chemicals has changed over the years; as a result, trend graphs in the TRI National Analysis include only those chemicals that were reportable for the entire time period presented so that the year-to-year data are comparable. Results which focus only on the year 2017 include all chemicals reportable for 2017. Thus, the results for 2017 analyses may differ slightly from results presented in trend analyses, which include 2017 and previous years. Data quality. Facilities determine the quantities of chemicals they report to TRI using best available data. Each year, EPA conducts an extensive data gualitv review that includes contacting facilities to review potential errors in reported information. This data quality review ensures the National Analysis is based on accurate and useful information. Risk. The quantity of TRI chemicals released is not an indicator of health risks posed by the chemicals. Although TRI data generally cannot indicate the extent to which individuals may have been exposed to chemicals, TRI data can be used as a starting point to evaluate the potential for exposure and whether TRI chemical releases might pose risks to human health and the environment. In particular, note that: o The level of toxicity varies among the covered chemicals; data on amounts of the chemicals alone are inadequate to reach conclusions on health-related risks; and o The presence of a chemical in the environment must be evaluated along with the potential and actual exposures and the route of exposures, the chemical's fate in the environment and other factors before any judgements can be made about potential risks associated with the chemical or a release. vvEPA 5 ------- TRI National Analysis 2017 www.epa.aov/trinationalanalysis/ March 2019 For more information on the use of TRI data in exposure and risk analyses, see Factors to Consider When Using Toxics Release Inventory Data and the Hazard and Potential Risk of TRI Chemicals in the Releases section. Late submissions. TRI reporting forms submitted to EPA after the July 1 reporting deadline may not be processed in time to be included in the National Analysis. While revisions can be submitted after the July 1 reporting deadline, the data used to develop the National Analysis is frozen in mid-October. Therefore, revisions received after this freeze date will not be reflected in the National Analysis. Those late revisions will be incorporated into the TRI dataset during the Spring refresh of the data and will be reflected in next year's National Analysis when it refers to 2017 data. Double-counting. The National Analysis presents summaries of many quantitative data elements (see "Quick Facts" below) including releases to the environment, which occur on site and off site after wastes are transferred to other businesses for further waste management. When aggregating releases across facilities, such as national totals, EPA adjusts off-site releases to eliminate double counting of releases if the receiving facility also reports to TRI. Quick Facts for 201 7 Measure Value Number of TRI Facilities 21,456 Production-Related Waste Managed 30.57 billion lb Recycled 14.69 billion lb Energy Recovery 2.95 billion lb Treated 8.98 billion lb Disposed of or Otherwise Released 3.95 billion lb Total Disposal or Other Releases 3.88 billion lb On-site 3.50 billion lb Air 0.60 billion lb Water 0.19 billion lb Land 2.71 billion lb Off-site 0.38 billion lb Note that two metrics shown in the Quick Facts box related to disposal or other releases are similar (3.95 and 3.88 billion pounds), but total disposal or other releases is slightly lower. vvEPA 6 ------- v>EPA TRI National Analysis 2017 www.epa.aov/trinationalanalysis/ March 2019 One of the reasons total disposal or other releases is lower is that it removes "double counting" that occurs when a facility that reports to EPA's TRI Program transfers waste to another TRI-reporting facility. For example, when TRI Facility A transfers a chemical off site for disposal to Facility B, Facility A reports the chemical as transferred off site for disposal while Facility B reports the same chemical as disposed of on site. In processing the data, the TRI Program recognizes that this is the same quantity of the chemical and includes it only once in the total disposal or other releases value. The production-related waste value in TRI, however, considers all instances where the waste is managed (first as a quantity sent off site for disposal and next as a quantity disposed of on site), and reflects both the off-site transfer and the on-site disposal. 7 ------- |