Grayson Lake, KY NATTS Network Assessment Review

•	Established 2008: Carbonyls, Chromium VI, PAHs, PMio Metals, and VOCs

o Chromium VI ended in in 2013

•	For the NATTS Network Assessment (2008-2018):

o 17 of 18 Method Quality Objective (MQO) Core HAPs were included in the national trends

¦ Chromium VI: Did not have six consecutive years of datasets suitable for trends analysis,
o 160 of 174 pollutant datasets were suitable for trends analysis

o Annual Average and 3-Year Rolling Average Concentrations were generally flat over time, with the

exception of a few pollutants,
o 100% Reporting of Datasets

•	Method Quality Objectives (MQO): 2008-2018

o Completeness: Met 85% completeness in 166 of 192 pollutant datasets
o Method Detection Limits: Met MDL Target Ratio of 1.00 in 182 of 204 pollutant datasets
o Bias: Met ±25% for 145 of 155 pollutant datasets

o Overall Method Precision: Met <15% CV for 66 of 110 pollutant datasets
o Analytical Method Precision: Met <15% CV for 110 of 124 pollutant datasets

•	Analytical Laboratories for 2018

voc

Carbonyl

PMio Metals

Chromium VI

PAHs

ERG

ERG

ERG

NA

ERG

• Equipment Year Deployed

Equipment Type

VOC

Carbonyl

PMio Metals

Chromium VI

PAHs

Sampler

2012

2012

2010

2008

2008

Analytical

2010

2018

2015

2001

2015

Preconcentrator

2007

NA

NA

NA

NA

Standards Preparation

1985

NA

NA

NA

NA

Canister Cleaning

2011

NA

NA

NA

NA

Extraction

NA

NA

2014

2011

2004


-------
National Summary: NATTS data were collected at 27 locations across the United States,

Table 1. NATTS Network Assessment: Count and Percentage of Suitable
Datasets by Pollutant Group

with sites beginning in 2003 or later (Figure 1) for 19 core HAPs. Over 528,000 concentrations

(primary, secondary, and replicate) were generated and analyzed for this assessment. Pollutant



A-i

*a led

B-rated

Ddi-s No!

datasets were scored to assess whether they were suitable for trends analysis. Each

Pollutant Group

#

<>/.
/O

#

%

#

¦¦¦¦a

pollutant dataset was evaluated against four MQOs: Completeness; Sensitivity; Bias; and

VOCs

1.452

53%

737

27%

55^

20"

Precision. Datasets that were suitable (A- or B-rated) for six consecutive years were used for

Carbonyls

52"

67%

193

25%



s""3

national trends analysis (Table 1).

PM10 Metals

1.4 IS

61%

685

30%

2M

9", Jy





Chromium VI

15'J

74%

29

13%

n

M"

National trends were determined by comparing the most recent 3-year blocked averages

PAHs

410

74%

124

22%

l«X



(e.g., 2013-2015 vs. 2016-2018) to determine if the NATTS Trends DQO was being met:

Total = 6,609

vj<>:

60%

1,768

27%



1 v'U



To be able to detect a al5 percent difference (trend) between the annual mean
concentrations of successive 3-year periods within acceptable levels of decision error.















Of the 19 core HAPs. 18 were assessed for the NATTS Trends DQO. Due to sampling and

Table 2. Three-Year Block Averages for National Trends



analytical issues, acrolein was not considered for trends analysis (Table 2). This assessment

Pollutant

Units

# Sites

Block 1

Block 2

% Difference

showed that across the network, 15 of those 18 pollutants were decreasing between the

Acetaldehyde

ng/m3

19

1.51

1.39

-7.7%

3-year blocks, while two of those pollutants were increasing between the 3-year blocks.

Arsenic (PM10)

ng/m

21

0.71

0.68

-3.2%

One pollutant did not exhibit a trend.

Benzene

ng/m3

19

0.65

0.59

-10.2%



Figure 1. NATTS Site and Year Established

Benzo(a)pyrene

ng/m3

21

0.113

0.087

-23.2%







Beryllium (PM10)

ng/m3

20

0.012

0.009

-26.4%



fe.tf'vvA	

Port!and u.'l; OS' Portiand OT> 	 r

/ \ " i > X

/ *- -a 4 ; 1 Und^'fT /

/ La Grande (#1), OR*/ 	* _ J-		 ] ,l 	,, ,r

/L,W«iBKQR S J h™;W,V , \

:	;					/ L	 ! """*¦¦ J \ ~ £*	,, css_.,

! / 	\ i



Butadiene, 1,3-

Hg/m3

19

0.071

0.063

-10.9%





Cadmium (PM10)

ng/m3

21

0.170

0.097

-43.0%





Carbon Tetrachloride

Hg/m3

15

0.59

0.56

-4.7%





Chloroform

Hg/m3

20

0.256

0.255

-0.4%





Chromium VI

ng/m

18

0.029

0.026

-7.7%



San'Jose.CA \ ^ ^		y' )'""v -m •

;i~- \ / A ,~™.< 				\ 1 i ifv &!;«>* j Bronx. {#2), NY"

( \ / Grand C° V St" Lof;«° )

\ \ . / /... \ ¦&,>	¦'' ™

\ - I	y

" ' 1 ""'T™, / ; 1 j / --r -

NATTS Sites "	„ i X

A Ru,al ' "		'• i 1 1

i ¦ Urban \ ? '> 		A		

NATTS - Year Established \ _ 	'

I 2003 \ "" jTampa, Ft

¦H 2004 \ Pinellas County. FL,

2007 \ i .i



Formaldehyde

Hg/m3

19

2.77

2.68

-3.3%





Lead (PM10)

ng/m

21

3.08

2.81

-8

9%





Manganese (PM10)

ng/m3

20

8.06

7.93

-1.6%





Naphthalene

ng/m3

20

66.70

51.08

-23.4%





Nickel (PM10)

ng/m3

19

1.28

1.05

-18.0%





T etrachloroethylene

ng/m3

19

0.149

0.174

17.2%





T richloroethylene

ng/m3

19

0.020

0.022

10.7%



, 2009



Vinyl Chloride

ng/m3

17

0.0051

0.0048

-5.5%



1 „n.7 " The Hazard. KY, Mayville. Wl, La Grande (#1). OR, Portland (#1), OR, sites were relocated m 2008, 2009. 2016. and 2017, respectively.
I "The Bronx (#1}, NY site temporarily moved to the Bronx <#2), NY site from mid-2010 to mid-2012.















Page 1 of 26


-------
Site Information

NATTS Monitoring Site Report: Grayson Lake, KY

Figure 2. NATTS Site Location

Region

4

NATTS Site Type

Rural

County

Carter

AQS Site Code

21-043-0500

NATTS Operating Agency

KY Dept. of Environmental Protection

Latitude

38.238333

Longitude

-82.988333

AQS Land Use

Residential

AQS Location Setting

Rural

10-Mile Population

27,202

Pollutant Datasets Evaluation: Suitable for Trends (Y=yes; Y(T

=yes, and usee

for DQO Trends; N=No; "~"=not rated

Final Pollutant Name

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

Acetaldehyde

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T)

Arsenic (PM10)

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T)

Benzene

Na

N

Y

Y

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T)

Benzo(a)pyrene

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T)

Beryllium (PM10)

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T)

Butadiene, 1,3-

Na

Nd

Y

Y

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T)

Cadmium (PM10)

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T)

Carbon tetrachloride

Na

N

Y

Y

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T)

Chloroform

Na

Nd

Y

Y

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T)

Chromium VI

Y

Y

Y

Y

Formaldehyde

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T)

Lead (PM10)

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T)

Manganese (PM10)

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T)

Naphthalene

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T)

Nickel (PM10)

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T)

T etrachloroethylene

Na

N

Y

Y

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T)

T richloroethylene

Na

Nd

Y

Y

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T)

Vinyl chloride

Na

Nd

Y

Y

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T

Y(T)

a: Pollutant was expected, but were invalidated at this site for this year.
b: Completeness was less than 75% based on l-in-6 day sampling

Page 2 of 26


-------
Table 3. NATTS Network Assessment Data (2003-2018) - National Distribution Statistics By Type3

Analyte

Units

Site Type

# Data
Records

%

Detections

Arithmetic
Meanb

Percentile Value0

5th

10th

25th

50th

75th

90th

95th

Acetaldehyde

ng/m3

Urban

15,704

100%

1.77 ± 0.02

0.50

0.66

0.97

1.45

2.19

3.24

4.04

ng/m3

Rural

4,930

100%

1.20 ± 0.04

0.36

0.46

0.65

0.93

1.38

2.02

2.76

ng/m3

All Sites

20,634

100%

1.63 ± 0.02

0.44

0.58

0.86

1.31

2.00

3.02

3.86

Arsenic (PM10)

ng/m3

Urban

14,968

97%

0.89 ± 0.04

0.10

0.19

0.34

0.58

0.99

1.70

2.41

ng/m3

Rural

4,622

96%

0.49 ± 0.02

0.04

0.08

0.17

0.35

0.59

0.94

1.28

ng/m3

All Sites

19,590

97%

0.79 ± 0.03

0.06

0.14

0.29

0.52

0.89

1.54

2.19

Benzene

Hg/m3

Urban

15,984

99%

0.86 ± 0.01

0.25

0.30

0.43

0.66

1.05

1.64

2.21

Hg/m3

Rural

2,494

95%

0.43 ± 0.02

0.04

0.13

0.21

0.33

0.52

0.78

1.01

Hg/m3

All Sites

18,478

99%

0.81 ± 0.01

0.19

0.26

0.39

0.61

0.98

1.55

2.09

Benzo(a)pyrene

ng/m3

Urban

12,336

70%

0.096 ± 0.004

ND

ND

ND

0.04

0.11

0.24

0.37

ng/m3

Rural

3,179

36%

0.067 ± 0.009

ND

ND

ND

ND

0.02

0.13

0.37

ng/m3

All Sites

15,515

63%

0.090 ± 0.004

ND

ND

ND

0.03

0.10

0.23

0.37

Beryllium (PM10)

ng/m3

Urban

15,783

75%

0.051 ± 0.006

ND

ND

0.00003

0.005

0.018

0.050

0.101

ng/m3

Rural

4,687

49%

0.023 ± 0.003

ND

ND

ND

ND

0.005

0.017

0.072

ng/m3

All Sites

20,470

69%

0.045 ± 0.005

ND

ND

ND

0.003

0.012

0.049

0.100

Butadiene, 1,3-

Hg/m3

Urban

15,388

81%

0.092 ± 0.002

ND

ND

0.025

0.058

0.114

0.215

0.302

ng/m3

Rural

2,185

29%

0.012 ± 0.001

ND

ND

ND

ND

0.017

0.046

0.059

ng/m3

All Sites

17,573

75%

0.082 ± 0.002

ND

ND

ND

0.049

0.104

0.199

0.287

Cadmium (PM10)

ng/m3

Urban

16,360

92%

0.21 ± 0.02

ND

0.01

0.05

0.09

0.17

0.42

0.63

ng/m3

Rural

4,684

87%

0.10 ± 0.01

ND

ND

0.03

0.06

0.11

0.20

0.29

ng/m3

All Sites

21,044

91%

0.18 ± 0.01

ND

0.01

0.04

0.08

0.16

0.35

0.56

Carbon Tetrachloride

ng/m3

Urban

14,713

99%

0.569 ± 0.003

0.361

0.433

0.496

0.562

0.651

0.737

0.798

ng/m3

Rural

2,189

92%

0.534 ± 0.016

ND

0.180

0.402

0.537

0.633

0.727

0.798

ng/m3

All Sites

16,902

98%

0.565 ± 0.003

0.304

0.408

0.490

0.559

0.649

0.736

0.798

Chloroform

ng/m3

Urban

16,068

87%

0.265 ± 0.022

ND

ND

0.093

0.132

0.217

0.420

0.668

ng/m3

Rural

3,802

43%

0.052 ± 0.003

ND

ND

ND

ND

0.095

0.144

0.230

ng/m3

All Sites

19,870

79%

0.224 ± 0.018

ND

ND

0.064

0.113

0.196

0.364

0.586

Chromium VI

ng/m3

Urban

8,414

74%

0.036 ± 0.002

ND

ND

ND

0.020

0.042

0.081

0.120

ng/m3

Rural

2,586

41%

0.018 ± 0.004

ND

ND

ND

ND

0.017

0.031

0.051

ng/m3

All Sites

11,000

66%

0.032 ± 0.001

ND

ND

ND

0.016

0.036

0.073

0.114

Page 3 of 26


-------
Table 3. NATTS Network Assessment Data (2003-2018) - National Distribution Statistics By Type3

Analyte

Units

Site Type

# Data
Records

%

Detections

Arithmetic
Meanb

Percentile Value0

5th

10th

25th

50th

75th

90th

95th

Formaldehyde

ng/m3

Urban

16,118

100%

3.11 ± 0.04

0.66

0.99

1.60

2.47

3.84

5.63

7.25

ng/m3

Rural

5,002

100%

2.22 ± 0.05

0.53

0.68

1.06

1.69

2.74

4.19

5.45

ng/m3

All Sites

21,120

100%

2.90 ± 0.04

0.61

0.86

1.43

2.29

3.59

5.38

6.96

Lead (PM10)

ng/m3

Urban

16,366

100%

4.21 ± 0.13

0.72

0.98

1.55

2.64

4.56

8.35

11.90

ng/m3

Rural

4,680

99%

2.10 ± 0.16

0.37

0.50

0.84

1.41

2.37

3.91

5.36

ng/m3

All Sites

21,046

99%

3.74 ± 0.11

0.55

0.80

1.31

2.31

4.04

7.41

10.56

Manganese (PM10)

ng/m3

Urban

16,141

100%

9.80 ± 0.32

1.09

1.51

2.52

4.92

10.21

20.10

30.08

ng/m3

Rural

4,627

99%

3.96 ± 0.14

0.46

0.73

1.36

2.57

4.75

8.54

12.13

ng/m3

All Sites

20,768

100%

8.50 ± 0.25

0.85

1.23

2.15

4.18

8.89

17.98

26.70

Naphthalene

ng/m3

Urban

12,332

100%

74.63 ± 1.14

15.62

21.27

33.55

55.89

94.64

150.05

196.16

ng/m3

Rural

3,301

100%

24.47 ± 1.38

3.74

4.73

7.74

13.86

26.25

50.88

79.17

ng/m3

All Sites

15,633

100%

64.04 ± 1.00

6.58

10.92

23.37

45.59

83.31

137.54

181.75

Nickel (PM10)

ng/m3

Urban

16,125

97%

1.85 ± 0.05

0.25

0.41

0.67

1.11

2.00

3.52

5.27

ng/m3

Rural

4,623

85%

0.65 ± 0.08

ND

ND

0.10

0.28

0.64

1.15

1.89

ng/m3

All Sites

20,748

94%

1.58 ± 0.04

ND

0.15

0.47

0.92

1.73

3.14

4.74

T etrachloroethylene

Hg/m3

Urban

15,612

86%

0.25 ± 0.01

ND

ND

0.06

0.13

0.25

0.48

0.74

Hg/m3

Rural

2,272

36%

0.09 ± 0.04

ND

ND

ND

ND

0.04

0.08

0.16

Hg/m3

All Sites

17,884

79%

0.23 ± 0.01

ND

ND

0.04

0.11

0.22

0.44

0.70

T richloroethylene

Hg/m3

Urban

15,843

41%

0.040 ± 0.002

ND

ND

ND

ND

0.051

0.107

0.164

ng/m3

Rural

3,388

13%

0.021 ± 0.003

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

0.017

0.250

ng/m3

All Sites

19,231

36%

0.037 ± 0.002

ND

ND

ND

ND

0.041

0.105

0.167

Vinyl Chloride

ng/m3

Urban

14,778

19%

0.0044 ± 0.0003

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

0.0137

0.0257

ng/m3

Rural

2,444

8%

0.0040 ± 0.0009

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

0.0156

ng/m3

All Sites

17,222

17%

0.0043 ± 0.0003

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

0.0126

0.0254

3 Statistics presented are from pollutant datasets which were suitable for trends.

b The arithmetic mean is the average of all samples results which include actual measured values. If no chemical was registered, then a value of zero is

used when calculating the mean.
c ND: No results of this chemical were registered by the laboratory analytical equipment.

Page 4 of 26


-------
Table 4. Summary Statistics for Grayson Lake, KY

Analyte

Units

# Data
Records

%

Detection

Arithmetic
Mean3

Percentile Valueb

5th

10th

25th

50th

75th

90th

95th

Acetaldehyde

l-ig/m3

621

100%

0.78 ± 0.03

0.38

0.45

0.56

0.72

0.91

1.20

1.44

Arsenic (PM10)

ng/m3

617

86%

0.48 ± 0.03

ND

ND

0.21

0.43

0.66

0.94

1.15

Benzene

l-ig/m3

514

100%

0.46 ± 0.03

0.21

0.23

0.29

0.40

0.55

0.71

0.83

Benzo(a)pyrene

ng/m3

621

57%

0.04 ± 0.01

ND

ND

ND

0.01

0.05

0.11

0.19

Beryllium (PM10)

ng/m3

617

64%

0.0037 ± 0.0005

ND

ND

ND

0.0020

0.0052

0.0097

0.0110

Butadiene, 1,3-

l-ig/m3

514

77%

0.036 ± 0.003

ND

ND

0.016

0.034

0.051

0.066

0.076

Cadmium (PM10)

ng/m3

617

73%

0.07 ± 0.01

ND

ND

ND

0.05

0.08

0.14

0.20

Carbon Tetrachloride

l-ig/m3

514

100%

0.64 ± 0.01

0.50

0.53

0.58

0.63

0.70

0.76

0.79

Chloroform

l-tg/m3

513

58%

0.06 ± 0.01

ND

ND

ND

0.08

0.11

0.13

0.14

Chromium VI

ng/m3

304

40%

0.006 ± 0.001

ND

ND

ND

ND

0.013

0.020

0.024

Formaldehyde

l-tg/m3

621

100%

1.52 ± 0.07

0.51

0.63

0.86

1.33

1.96

2.76

3.24

Lead (PM10)

ng/m3

617

100%

1.85 ± 0.13

0.50

0.65

0.97

1.41

2.19

3.35

4.24

Manganese (PM10)

ng/m3

617

96%

2.98 ± 0.25

0.29

0.70

1.24

2.08

3.75

5.99

8.24

Naphthalene

ng/m3

622

100%

17.50 ± 1.16

5.48

6.57

9.33

13.77

21.07

30.39

41.90

Nickel (PM10)

ng/m3

617

75%

0.25 ± 0.02

ND

ND

0.06

0.20

0.32

0.51

0.68

T etrachloroethylene

l-tg/m3

514

47%

0.028 ± 0.003

ND

ND

ND

ND

0.05

0.07

0.09

Trichloroethylene

l-ig/m3

514

4%

0.002 ± 0.001

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Vinyl Chloride

l-tg/m3

514

9%

0.001 ± 0.000

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

0.014

3 :The arithmetic mean is the average of all samples results which included actual measured values. If no chemical was registered, then a value of zero is used.
bND: No results of this chemical were registered by the laboratory analytical equipment.

Analytical Labs Supporting this Site

Pollutant Group

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

VOCs

--

--

--

--

--

ERG

ERG

ERG

ERG

ERG

ERG

ERG

ERG

ERG

ERG

ERG

Carbonyls

--

--

--

--

--

ERG

ERG

ERG

ERG

ERG

ERG

ERG

ERG

ERG

ERG

ERG

PM10 Metals

--

--

--

--

--

ERG

ERG

ERG

ERG

ERG

ERG

ERG

ERG

ERG

ERG

ERG

Chromium VI

--

--

--

--

--

ERG

ERG

ERG

ERG

ERG

ERG

--

--

--

--

--

PAHs

--

--

--

--

--

ERG

ERG

ERG

ERG

ERG

ERG

ERG

ERG

ERG

ERG

ERG

Not Applicable

ERG: Eastern Research Group, Inc.

Page 5 of 26


-------
Figure 3. Grayson Lake, KY Annual Average Concentrations

1.25

1.00

'f

of;

3 0.75

a
o

g 0.50

O

0.25

0.00

Grayson Lake, KY
Annual Averages:
Acetaldehyde

I I

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Year

1

K

©

1.0

0.8

0.6

1 °"4

a
o

S-> 0.2

0.0 4-

Grayson Lake, KY
Annual Averages:
Arsenic (PM10)

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Year

1.0

0.8

s

"5b

o

s

u
«
o

Q

0.6

0.4

0.0

Grayson Lake, KY
Annual Averages:
Benzene

1

i

T
J.

T
X

20OS 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Year

0.10

I

s
o

0.08

0.06

0.04

O

U 0.02

0.00

Grayson Lake, KY
Annual Averages:
Benzo(a)pyrene

< c

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Year

Page 6 of 26


-------
Figure 3. Grayson Lake, KY Annual Average Concentrations

0.012



Grayson Lake, KY
Annual Averages:
Beryllium (PM10)

o.io

Grayson Lake, KY
Annual Averages:
1,3-Butadiene

f

0.009

,£ 0.006

O 0.003
O

1

a
&

0.08

0.06

ri
o

^0.04

a

Q

U 0.02

I

I I

0.000

~ 	r	~	r-

-	;	r~

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 201? 2018

Year

0.00

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Year

0.25

,-,0.20

S

1

w

a

.2

| 0.10

a

o

° 0.05

0.15

0.00

Grayson Lake, KY7
Annual Averages:
Cadmium (PM10)

I

I t

		I

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Year

1.0

a

a

o

0.6

0.4

a
a

o o.;

0.0

Grayson Lake, KY
Annual Averages:
Carbon Tetrachloride

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Year

Page 7 of 26


-------
Figure 3. Grayson Lake, KY Annual Average Concentrations

0.20

- 016

I

O 0.12

a

o

i 008

a

o

O 0.04

0.00

Grayson Lake, KY
Annual Averages:
Chloroform

i i

I

i

JL

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Year

2.0

5

'I

a
o

1.5

1.0

o

O 0-?

0.0

Grayson Lake, KY
Annual. Averages:
Formaldehyde

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Year

0.016

^ 0.012



a

.2 0.008

0.004

0.000

Grayson Lake, KY
Annual Averages;
Hexavalent Chromium

2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013

Year

4.0

l

a

o

2.4

1.6

o

C-> 0.8

0.0

Grayson Lake, KY
Annual Averages:
Lead (PM10)

{

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Year

Page 8 of 26


-------
Figure 3. Grayson Lake, KY Annual Average Concentrations

1

c

o

6.0

4.8

3,6

2.4

s

o

U i.:

0.0

Grayson Lake, KY
Annual Averages:
Manganese (PM10)





4

> '

>



4

~

4

~

4

~





<

>

~













2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 201S

Year

35.0

«£>

I

w

S3

O

28.0

>1.0

14.0

a

6

0.0

Grayson Lake, KY
Annual. Averages:
Naphthalene

* j

tr

~

4

~

4

*









4 «

~

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Year

0.75

,C

|o.
o

0.60

45

0.30

Q 0.15

0.00

Grayson Lake, KY
Annual Averages:
Nickel (PM10)









4

4

*

~

<

~

4 ~

4

• i



1

* J

i i

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Year

0.06
0.05

S

~6b 0-04

S3

O 0.03

a

o
O

0.02
0.01
0.00

Grayson Lake, KY
Annual Averages:
Tetrachloroethylene

4

~

—~—















4

k

4

~

4

4

~

>

~













2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Year

Page 9 of 26


-------
Figure 3. Grayson Lake, KY Annual Average Concentrations

!

3

e

|

q
o
O

0.010

0.008

0.006

0.004

0.002

0.000

Grayson Lake, KY
Annual Averages;
Trichloroethylene

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2018 2017 201S

Year

0.007

0.006
0.005

¦C"

f

a

a 0.004
o

1

0.003

| 0.002

u

0.001

0.000

Grayson Lake, KY
Annual Averages;
Vinyl Chloride













i

















4

~



4

<

~

~



<

*

- i _ . -







200S 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Year

2015 2016 2017 2018

Does not meet MQO

Page 10 of 26


-------
Figure 4. Grayson Lake, KY - 3-Year Rolling Average Concentrations

a

s

"fi

cc

a

Q

U

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

Grayson Lake, KY
3-Year Rolling Averages:
Acetaldehyde

T i

¥

o.o

^ ^



'4>

f/j

Years



A



^ ^

tsl>
3

«
O

SB

a

a
o

o

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

Grayson Lake, KY
3-Year Rolling Averages:
Arsenic (PM10)

o.o



°K,°o





''J



*0,

%

-V



!"
-------
Figure 4. Grayson Lake, KY - 3-Year Rolling Average Concentrations

Grayson Lake, KY
3-Year Rolling Averages:
Benzene

1.25

1.00

5

8
h

a
o

u

0.75

0.50

0.25

0.00

^

Years

~^0/s

Grayson Lake, KY
3-Year Rolling Averages:
Benzo(a)pyrene

0.075

0.060

0.045

0

Wi

S
<5

g 0.030

1

u

0.015

0.000






-------
Figure 4. Grayson Lake, KY - 3-Year Rolling Average Concentrations

0.010

0.008

a

"St.

¦S

"a* o.ooe

O

s

fa

s
o

Q

0.004

0.002

0.000

Grayson Lake, KY
3-Year Rolling Averages;
Beryllium (PM10)

f

i



%



%

^

*0'/

*

'»/„ ^

Years

Grayson Lake, KY
3-Year Rolling Averages:
1,3-Butadiene

o.io

0.08

sr*

0.06

S

G

0.04

«
o

U

0.02

0.00

?

i t

^

X-.	fy- ?/,	*-«0^	°<> X.,	v-

%/	%7j



^

Years

Page 13 of 26


-------
Figure 4. Grayson Lake, KY - 3-Year Rolling Average Concentrations

Grayson Lake, KY
3-Year Rolling Averages;

Cadmium (PM10)

0,15

- 0.12

a



G 0,09
O

1

a

o
O

0.06

0,03





0.00

%



fCk, -0/,, -V>/,	-?0/, *Vy,	<?



%

Page 14 of 26


-------
Figure 4. Grayson Lake, KY - 3-Year Rolling Average Concentrations

Grayson Lake, KY'

3-Year Rolling Averages:

Chloroform

0,15

5

a

G
U

0.12

d 0,09
o

M

0.06

f

J

i

0.03



0.00

" *>'0 %

"% <0's

Years











%









%

2.5

€? 2.0

s , ,

O 1.5

a i-o

o

O

0,5

0,0

Grayson Lake, KY'
3-Year Rolling Averages;
Formaldehyde

*>/0	0//	0,2	0f3	0}S	*>*6	°f?	0f8

Years

Page 15 of 26


-------
Figure 4. Grayson Lake, KY - 3-Year Rolling Average Concentrations

Grayson Lake, KY
3-Year Rolling Averages:
Hexavalent Chromium

0,012

,0 0,010

"i?

a
o
•ss

OS

in

0,008

0.006

a
o

^ 0.004

0,002

0.000

2008-2010

2009-2011

2010-2012

2011-2013

Years

Grayson Lake, KY
3-Year Rolling Averages;
Lead (PM10)

3,0

O 2,4

a' 1,8
o

g

C

O
O

0.6

0,0

^/?	*%¦ Vi/7 Vj/#

Years

Page 16 of 26


-------
Figure 4. Grayson Lake, KY - 3-Year Rolling Average Concentrations

Grayson Lake, KY
3-Year Rolling Averages:
Manganese (P\I10)

5,0

O 4,0

9
~5b

a

•w

S 3,0
o

•s

ss
b

a

6

2.0

1,0

0,0









'//

-?
-------
Figure 4. Grayson Lake, KY - 3-Year Rolling Average Concentrations

Grayson Lake, KY
3-Year Rolling Averages:

Nickel (PM,0)

0.5

G

''w''

a
o

Is

i=

§

O

0,4

0.3

0,2

0.1

4



t

i



0,0







^ ^ ^ ^

% % ^

Years

Grayson Lake, KY
3-Year Rolling Averages:
Tetrachloroethvlene

0,05

gr*< 0,04

a 0,03
_o
¦*—»

S

2 0,02

I

u

0,01

0,00

1III

^

^0/0	--Of,	-?0/*-0/y

"//

%/

Years

Page 18 of 26


-------
Figure 4. Grayson Lake, KY - 3-Year Rolling Average Concentrations

Grayson Lake, KY
3-Year Rolling Averages;
Trichloroethylene

0.010

I

=1.

0,008

0.006

cc

3

8 0.004
cj

a

p

0.002

0.000





%

%

%







'>/





V?



%

Years

%



%





%





'O



%

Grayson Lake, KY
3-Year Rolling Averages:
Yinyl Chloride

0.005



a

o

S

J3

3

3

0.004

0.003

0.002

0.001

0.000

1

1'0	^	^	^

'	%// % *>*3	% -°/7 *>'9

Years

Does not meet MQO

Concentrations not included in Analysis

Page 19 of 26


-------
Table 6. NATTS Network Assessment: MQO#l - Completeness Percentage at Grayson Lake, KY

Pollutant Group

Carbonyl

Carbonyl

Chromium VI

PAH

PAH

PM10 Metals

PM10 Metals

PM10 Metals

PM10 Metals

PM10 Metals

PM10 Metals

voc

voc

voc

voc

voc

voc

voc

Year

Acetaldehyde

Formaldehyde

Chromium VI

Benzo(a)pyrene

Naphthalene

Arsenic (PM10)

Beryllium (PM10)

Cadmium (PM10)

Lead (PM10)

Manganese (PM10)

Nickel (PM10)

Benzene

Butadiene, 1,3-

Carbon tetrachloride

Chloroform

T etrachloroethylene

T richloroethylene

Vinyl chloride

2008

2009

00

100

100

100

loo

MX

MX

MX

MX

MX

MX

2010

MX

MX

loo

MX

mx

0<

0(

0(

0(

()(

()(

2011

X4

X4

100

I 00

100

MX

MX

MX

MX

MX

MX

I 01)

1 (id

loo

100

100

loo

100

2012

|00

100

loo

|00

100

n

>1

)1

)1

)1

)1

>x

>x

>x

>x

>X

>x

>x

2013

00

00



)s

n

)1

)1

n

n

)1

2014

)()

10

2015

|00

loo

MX

MX

M7

M7

M7

M7

m7

M7

100

100

loo

100

I DO

|oo

100

2016

loo

loo

|00

100

M7

M7

M7

M7

M7

M7

00

oo

oo

oo

oo

00

00

A-rated: >85%

B-rated: Between 75% to 85%
Does not meet: <75%

No data available

2017

)X

>X

)X

>X

)X

>X

>X

>X

>X

2018









>i





)X

>X

>X

)1

>x

>x

>x

Due to site logistical issues, sampling ended at the Hazard, KY site in May 2008. The site relocated to Grayson Lake, KY and sampling resumed in October 2008.
b: Scheduled sampling ended midway through the year, thus, the site did not have the opportunity to collect enough samples to meet the 85% MQO.
c: Pollutant was expected, but results were invalidated at this site for this year.
d: Analysis of VOCs were switched to the National Monitoring Program lab in summer 2010.

Page 20 of 26


-------
Table 7. NATTS Network Assessment: MQO#2 - Reported Method Detection Limits (MDLs) at Grayson Lake, KY

Pollutant
Group

Pollutant Name

Target
MDL

Units

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

Carbonyl

Acetaldehyde

0.45

l-tg/m3

0 IS

0.04

o.o4

0.02

0.02

O.o2

0.01

0.02

O.o2

0.06

0.06

Carbonyl

Formaldehyde

0.98/0.08a

Ug/m3

0.03

0.01

o.ol

0.01

0.01

O.I2

0.1 1

0.12

0 1 1

0.54

0.54

Chromium VI

Chromium VI

0.08

ng/m3

0 ()S

0.05

o.ol

0.05

0.04

0.05

"

--

--

--

--

PAH

Benzo(a)pyrene

0.91

ng/m3

0 07

0.06

o 03

0.04

0.05

(i.(i5

0.03

0.13

o Oft

0.02

0.01

PAH

Naphthalene

29.00

ng/m3

o.o|5

0.007

o.(i( ii)

0.003

0.004

0.00ft

().0| |

0.005

o 023

0.063

0.056

PM10 Metals

Arsenic (PM10)

0.23

ng/m3

o 45

0.45

o 5ft

0.68

0.74

0.S7

0.96

0.06

0.17

0.16

0.15

PM10 Metals

Beryllium (PM10)

0.42

ng/m3

0.2ft

0.20

0 20

0.02

0.05

0.05

0.05

0.002

0.002

0.002

0.003

PM10 Metals

Cadmium (PM10)

0.56

ng/m3

0.17

0.17

o. Il>

0.02

0.02

0 02

0.02

O.0I4

o 004

0.004

0.009

PM10 Metals

Lead (PM10)

15.0

ng/m3

0.013

0.013

0.O07

o.ool

0.005

0.007

0.003

0.002

0.002

0.002

0.004

PM10 Metals

Manganese (PM10)

5.0

ng/m3

o 02

0.02

0.024

0.03

0.06

O.o3

0.03

0.02

0.02

0.02

0.04

PM10 Metals

Nickel (PM10)

2.1

ng/m3

0 05

0.05

0.07S

0.08

0.19

o 12

0.09

o 1 1

0.10

0.1 1

0.56

voc

Benzene

0.13

l-tg/m3

m

0.98

0 47

0.71

1.50

0 47

0.37

0.96

o 52

0.64

0.36

voc

Butadiene, 1,3-

0.10

l-tg/m3

lyk"

5®

0 22

0.15

0.24

() 24

0.29

0.3 1

0.58

0.44

0.43

voc

Carbon tetrachloride

0.17

l-tg/m3

lyi^

\%%v

0 SM

0.89

0.89

0 51)

0.63

0.37

o.5l)

0.85

0.49

voc

Chloroform

0.50

l-tg/m3



0.20

0.17

0.09

0.14

0.15

0.14

0.16

0 12

0.19

0.13

voc

T etrachloroethylene

0.17

l-tg/m3

lyi^



0 44

0.72

0.80

0.5ft

0.52

0.56

0.ft4

1.24

0.58

voc

T richloroethylene

0.5/0.2a

l-tg/m3

lyk

0.22

0 is

0.27

0.24

0 43

0.46

0.46

o 43

0.94

0.40

voc

Vinyl chloride

0.11

l-tg/m3

lik



0.30

0.19

0.26

0 2ft

0.28

0.19

0.74

0.40

0.30

	I A-ratcd: MDL to Target MDL ratio < 1

J B-rated" MDL to Target MDL ratio between 1 and 2
[Does Not Meet MDL to Target MDL ratio>2

	--	No data available

a: For the 2012 sampling year, the Target MDL for this pollutant was reduced.
b: Pollutant was expected, but results were invalidated at this site for this year.

Page 21 of 26


-------
Table 8. NATTS Network Assessment: MQO#3 - Bias Percent Difference at Grayson Lake, KY

Pollutant Group

Pollutant Name

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

Carbonyls

Acetaldehyde

2:)

-20.0

0.7

3.0

a

I) 1

-4.3

a

-5.4

3.6

-8.7

Carbonyls

Formaldehyde



-13.7

-2.8

-3.4

a

mi

-? ?

a

-19.1

-5.3

—3.1

Chromium VI

Chromium VI

a

-5.6h

10.5h

a

19.5

-('.5

"

--

--

--

-

PAH

Benzo(a)pyrene

a

-1.7

-2.3

-2.1

25.2

_s ~~

-16.3

-14.2

-10.5

-22.4

-14.8

PAH

Naphthalene

a

-7 7

-17.1

-13.9

21.4

25 5

0.7

-11 4

-9.5

-11.6

-20.7

PM10 Metals

Arsenic (PM10)

".<>

12.0

/

1.4

15.7

-3 O

1.9

a

-2.3

-1.4

-3.4

PM10 Metals

Beryllium (PM10)

2.5

32.0

11.2

-8.2

17.5

-2.0

c

a

-0.4

3.1

0.5

PM10 Metals

Cadmium (PM10)

4 3

17.2

4.9

-5.7

16.6

1 4

c

a

3.9

2.8

3.0

PM10 Metals

Lead (PM10)

1
- _ /

-6.2

-3.5

-6.3

19.9

O 1

J J

a

-1.6

-0.4

-1.9

PM10 Metals

Manganese (PM10)

l.l>

-4.8

0.6

-3.8

21.5

-<>.:

13.2

a

3.9

1.3

2.6

PM10 Metals

Nickel (PM10)

:

voc

Benzene



181S1I

-13.2

10.2

a

".J.

18.1

-5.3

5.2

14.6

-11.8

voc

Butadiene, 1,3-





1

- ¦) _ /

Id y

a

II111J

-8.1

-22.0

-lo 1

3.9

-6.6

voc

Carbon tetrachloride

8r «.



3 1.6

25.4

a

1 v3

24.2

ijggil



26.5

()

voc

Chloroform





1.0

-9.7

a

-2 4

8.5

10.3

8.1

9.2

-7.5

voc

T etrachloroethylene





-16.1

0.8

a

-K) 5

-1.8

-14.6

-5.5

13.0

-3.8

voc

T richloroethylene





-6.4

-8.3

a

3.0

-0.3

-10.0

-9.5

9.6

-14.6

voc

Vinyl chloride

H\ &

\

-14.1

0.3

a

-8 1

10.0

-7.1

1.5



-9 7

A-rated:±25%

B-rated: Between 25% to 35% or between -25% to -35%
Does not meet:>35% or <35%

No data available

No Proficiency Test samples were sent for this pollutant and year.
b: Proficiency Test results are from the National Contract Lab for EPA's School Air Toxics Monitoring Program. The %Difference was -5.55% in 2009 and 10.53% in 2010.
c: The Proficiency Test sample for this pollutant was 0; the site reported a concentration as "
-------
Table 9. NATTS Network Assessment: MQO#4 - Overall Method Precision %CV at Grayson Lake, KY

Pollutant Group

Pollutant Name

Overall Met

lod precision % CV

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

Carbonyls

Acetaldehyde

5.X

15:

11.7

6.5

1.6

1 1

1.1

—

--

1.0

0.9

Carbonyls

Formaldehyde

4:

15 4

12.8

6.6

2.1

2.3

0.6

—

--

1.2

1.0

Chromium VI

Chromium VI

a

^.4

7.1

20.4

5.2

a

--

—

--

—

--

PAH

Benzo(a)pyrene

--

—

--

—

--

—

--

—

--

—

--

PAH

Naphthalene

--

—

--

—

--

—

--

—

--

—

--

PM10 Metals

Arsenic (PM10)

h <¦)

(•> <•>

10.7

20.3

16.9

13 4

17.3

15 8

8.0

4.1

3 3

PM10 Metals

Beryllium (PM10)

a

a

a

0

a

a

0

18 (I

llllll

15.9

14.5

PM10 Metals

Cadmium (PM10)

a

a

a

20.6

|3§ii6

35 7

Sill

15 <¦>

7.5

3.4

2.8

PM10 Metals

Lead (PM10)

lmi\

6.8

5.5

15.1

4.1

18 5

23.5

13.4

8.3

2.4

1.5

PM10 Metals

Manganese (PM10)



IBIS

ISIS



3.4

17 7

12.6

<¦) 0

6.1

3.7

5.0

PM10 Metals

Nickel (PM10)

a



6.9

SMli

1.2

27.0

SSS1

IPIjl

22.3

8.8

a

voc

Benzene

--

~

Sllli!

6.1

10.5

(>

6.4

"

--

13.2

6.7

voc

Butadiene, 1,3-

—

~

16.8

20.1

8.2

7.4

15.8

—

~

a

a

voc

Carbon tetrachloride

—

--



4.3

7.2

7.2

22.3

—

--

4.4

5.1

voc

Chloroform

—

~

()

4.8

21.1

—

3.0

—

~

lill

8.9

voc

T etrachloroethylene

—

~

a

a

a

a

a

—

~

a

a

voc

T richloroethylene

—

~

a

a

a

—

a

—

~

a

a

voc

Vinyl chloride

--

~

a

a

a

--

a

"

a

a

a

A-rated:< 15% CV

B-rated: Between 15%CV to25% CV

Does Not Meet: >25% CV or did not report Precision (required in the NATTS Workplan Template since 2012)
No data available

. Although both primary and secondary data were reported, both sets of values were less than the MDL. Thus no %CV was calculated.

Page 23 of 26


-------
Table 10. NATTS Network Assessment: MQO#4 - Analytical Precision %CV at Grayson Lake, KY

Pollutant Group

Pollutant Name

Analytical Method precision % CV

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

Carbonyls

Acetaldehyde

--

—

--

0.4

0.7

1.4

0.7

3.0

0.7

0.8

1.6

Carbonyls

Formaldehyde

--

—

~

0.9

1.0

1.3

1 i)

1.2

0.5

0.8

1.6

Chromium VI

Chromium VI

~

6.7

6.4

5.8

4.8

12.1

—

--

—

--

—

PAH

Benzo(a)pyrene

—

--

—

--

2.0

6.0

r> <¦>

a

1.7

2.0

3.0

PAH

Naphthalene

—

~

—

~

2.7

2.1

:.(>

4.5

0.5

1.2

0.8

PM10 Metals

Arsenic (PM10)

--

~

--

7.5

12.7

18.1

15 3

8.8

2.9

2.7

2.1

PM10 Metals

Beryllium (PM10)

~

--

~

0

0

0

24 h

12.1

24.2

14.2

12.7

PM10 Metals

Cadmium (PM10)

~

~

--

5.1

12.0

10.4

Id <¦)

12.7

3.6

1.6

2.3

PM10 Metals

Lead (PM10)

~

~

~

0.9

0.8

1.8

l.f)

1.3

1.3

0.9

0.3

PM10 Metals

Manganese (PM10)

~

~

~

0.4

1.4

1.3

1 i)

2.3

2.8

0.9

1.2

PM10 Metals

Nickel (PM10)

--

~

~

f§§H§

1.7

18.9



7.6

7.3

0.9

a

voc

Benzene

~

—

4.5

8.3

6.5

4.6

4 8

^mi

111111

5.5

5.2

voc

Butadiene, 1,3-

~

—

6.7

6.7

6.8

5.7

120

a

0

a

9.8

voc

Carbon tetrachloride

~

—

1.9

5.8

7.4

6.1

1 2

6.7

4.9

1 1 1

5.6

voc

Chloroform

~

—

3.0

7.4

17.2



5 1

14.5

19.5

7.5

9.5

voc

T etrachloroethylene

--

—

a

a

a



a

a

a

a

a

voc

T richloroethylene

~

—

--

—

a



a

a

a

a

a

voc

Vinyl chloride

~

--

--

20.2

a



a

a

a

a

a

A-rated:< 15% CV

B-rated: Between 15%CV to25% CV

Does Not Meet: >25% CV or did not report Precision (required in the NATTS Workplan Template since 2012)
No data available

. Hie primal) and or replicate value were less than the MDL, so no calculation could be made.

Page 24 of 26


-------
Appendix A. Equipment Inventory

Method

Year(s)

Manufacturer/Model, Extraction Type, and Year

Sampling Equipment



2008-2010

ATEC 2200 Toxic Air Sampler (Year Deployed: 2008)

Carbonyls

2011-2011

ATEC 2200 Toxic Air Sampler (2 units) (Year Deployed: 2008)



2012-2018

ATEC 2200 Toxic Air Sampler (2 units) (Year Deployed: 2012)

Chormium VI

2008-2013

URG Model 3000 (Year Deployed: 2008)

PAHs

2008-2018

Tisch Environmental TE-1000 PUF Sampler (Year Deployed: 2008)

PM10 Metals

2008-2010

Thermo R&P Parisol-FRM 2000 Air Sampler (Year Deployed: 2000)

2011-2018

Thermo R&P Parisol-FRM 2000 Air Sampler (2 units) (Year Deployed: 2010)

VOCs

2008-2011

ATEC 2200 Toxic Air Sampler (Year Deployed: 2008)

2012-2018

ATEC 2200 Toxic Air Sampler (Year Deployed: 2012)

Analytical Equipment

Carbonyls

2008-2017

Waters Alliance 2695 HPLC /model 2487 Dual Absorbance (Year Deployed: 2003)

2018

Waters Alliance e2695 HPLC /model 2489 Dual Absorbance (Year Deployed: 2018)

Chromium VI

2005-2013

Dionex 300 ion chromatography system (Year Deployed: 2001)

PAHs

2008-2014

HP/Agilent 5890/5971 GC/MS (Year Deployed: 2008)

2015-2018

HP/Agilent 7890B/5975C GC/MS (Year Deployed: 2015)

PM10 Metals

2008-2014

PE ELAN 9000 ICP-MS (Year Deployed: 2003)

2015-2018

Thermo iCAP Q ICP-MS (Year Deployed: 2015)



2008-2009

HP/Agilent 6890/5973 GC/MS (Year Deployed: 2005)

VOCs

2010

HP/Agilent 5890/5971 GC/MS (Year Deployed: 2008)



2011-2018

HP/Agilent 6890/5975 GC/MS (Year Deployed: 2010)

Preconcentrator Equipment

VOCs

2008-2018

Entech 7100A (Year Deployed: 2007)

Standards Preparation Equipment

VOCs

2008-2018

Custom-built (dynamic dilution) (Year Deployed: 1985)

Canister Cleaning Equipment

VOCs

2008-2010

Custom-built (Cold) (Year Deployed: 2003)

2011-2018

Wasson-ECE TO Clean (Hot) (Year Deployed: 2010)

PM10 Extraction Equipment



2003

Branson 8510 (Sonicator) (Year Deployed: unknown)

PM10 Metals

2004-2013

Branson 8510 (Sonicator) (Year Deployed: 2004)



2014-2018

Environmental Express (Hotblock) (Year Deployed: 2014)

Page 25 of 26


-------
Appendix A. Equipment Inventory

Method

Year(s)

Manufacturer/Model, Extraction Type, and Year

Chromium VI Extraction Equipment



2008-2010

Branson 8510 (Sonicator) (Year Deployed: 2001)

Chromium VI

2011

Branson 8510 Sonicator/ Branson Shaker (Year Deployed: 2001/2011)



2012-2014

Branson Shaker (Year Deployed: 2011)

PAHs Extraction Equipment

PAHs

2008-2018 Dionex -300 (ASE) (Year Deployed: 2004)

Page 26 of 26


-------