METHOD 515.1

DETERMINATION OF CHLORINATED ACIDS IN WATER BY GAS
CHROMATOGRAPHY WITH AN ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTOR

Revision 4.0

R.C. Dressman and J.J. Lichtenberg — EPA 600/4-81-053, Revision 1.0 (1981)

J.W. Hodgeson — Method 515, Revision 2.0 (1986)

T. Engels (Battelle Columbus Laboratories) — National Pesticide Survey
Method 3, Revision 3.0 (1987)

R.L. Graves — Method 515.1, Revision 4.0 (1989)

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING SYSTEMS LABORATORY
OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45268

515.1-1


-------
METHOD 515.1

DETERMINATION OF CHLORINATED ACIDS IN WATER BY GAS
CHROMATOGRAPHY WITH AN ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTOR

SCOPE AND APPLICATION

1.1 This is a gas chromatographic (GC) method applicable to the determination of
certain chlorinated acids in ground water and finished drinking water.1 The
following compounds can be determined by this method:

Analyte

Chemical Abstract Services
Registry Number

Acifluorfen*

50594-66-6

Bentazon

25057-89-0

Chloramben*

133-90-4

2,4-D

94-75-7

Dalapon*

75-99-0

2,4-DB

94-82-6

DCPA acid metabolites3



Dicamba

1918-00-9

3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid

51-36-5

Dichlorprop

120-36-5

Dinoseb

88-85-7

5-Hydroxydicamba

7600-50-2

4-Nitrophenol*

100-02-7

Pentachlorophenol (PCP)

87-86-5

Picloram

1918-02-1

2,4,5-T

93-76-5

2,4,5-TP

93-72-1

diacid metabolite used for validation studies.

These compounds are only qualitatively identified in the National
Pesticides Survey (NPS) Program. These compounds are not quantitated
because control over precision has not been accomplished.

1.2	This method may be applicable to the determination of salts and esters of analyte
acids. The form of each acid is not distinguished by this method. Results are
calculated and reported for each listed analyte as the total free acid.

1.3	This method has been validated in a single laboratory and estimated detection
limits (EDLs) have been determined for the analytes above (Section 13.0).
Observed detection limits may vary between ground waters, depending upon the
nature of interferences in the sample matrix and the specific instrumentation used.

515.1-2


-------
1.4	This method is restricted to use by or under the supervision of analysts
experienced in the use of GC and in the interpretation of gas chromatograms.
Each analyst must demonstrate the ability to generate acceptable results with this
method using the procedure described in Section 10.3.

1.5	Analytes that are not separated chromatographically, i.e., which have very similar
retention times, cannot be individually identified and measured in the same
calibration mixture or water sample unless an alternate technique for
identification and quantitation exist (Section 11.8).

1.6	When this method is used to analyze unfamiliar samples for any or all of the
analytes above, analyte identifications must be confirmed by at least one
additional qualitative technique.

2.0 SUMMARY OF METHOD

2.1	A measured volume of sample of approximately 1 L is adjusted to pH 12 with 6
N sodium hydroxide and shaken for one hour to hydrolyze derivatives.
Extraneous organic material is removed by a solvent wash. The sample is
acidified, and the chlorinated acids are extracted with ethyl ether by shaking in
a separatory funnel or mechanical tumbling in a bottle. The acids are converted
to their methyl esters using diazomethane as the derivatizing agent. Excess
derivatizing reagent is removed, and the esters are determined by capillary
column/GC using an electron capture detector (ECD).

2.2	The method provides a Florisil cleanup procedure to aid in the elimination of
interferences that may be encountered.

3.0 DEFINITIONS

3.1	Internal Standard — A pure analyte(s) added to a solution in known amount(s)
and used to measure the relative responses of other method analytes and
surrogates that are components of the same solution. The internal standard must
be an analyte that is not a sample component.

3.2	Surrogate Analyte — A pure analyte(s), which is extremely unlikely to be found
in any sample, and which is added to a sample aliquot in known amount(s)
before extraction and is measured with the same procedures used to measure
other sample components. The purpose of a surrogate analyte is to monitor
method performance with each sample.

3.3	Laboratory Duplicates (LD1 and LD2) — Two sample aliquots taken in the
analytical laboratory and analyzed separately with identical procedures. Analyses
of LD1 and LD2 give a measure of the precision associated with laboratory
procedures, but not with sample collection, preservation, or storage procedures.

3.4	Field Duplicates (FD1 and FD2) — Two separate samples collected at the same
time and place under identical circumstances and treated exactly the same

515.1-3


-------
throughout field and laboratory procedures. Analyses of FD1 and FD2 give a
measure of the precision associated with sample collection, preservation and
storage, as well as with laboratory procedures.

3.5	Laboratory Reagent Blank (LRB) — An aliquot of reagent water that is treated
exactly as a sample including exposure to all glassware, equipment, solvents,
reagents, internal standards, and surrogates that are used with other samples.
The LRB is used to determine if method analytes or other interferences are
present in the laboratory environment, the reagents, or the apparatus.

3.6	Field Reagent Blank (FRB) — Reagent water placed in a sample container in the
laboratory and treated as a sample in all respects, including exposure to sampling
site conditions, storage, preservation and all analytical procedures. The purpose
of the FRB is to determine if method analytes or other interferences are present
in the field environment.

3.7	Laboratory Performance Check Solution (LPC) — A solution of method analytes,
surrogate compounds, and internal standards used to evaluate the performance
of the instrument system with respect to a defined set of method criteria.

3.8	Laboratory Fortified Blank (LFB) — An aliquot of reagent water to which known
quantities of the method analytes are added in the laboratory. The LFB is
analyzed exactly like a sample, and its purpose is to determine whether the
methodology is in control, and whether the laboratory is capable of making
accurate and precise measurements at the required method detection limit.

3.9	Laboratory Fortified Sample Matrix (LFM) — An aliquot of an environmental
sample to which known quantities of the method analytes are added in the
laboratory. The LFM is analyzed exactly like a sample, and its purpose is to
determine whether the sample matrix contributes bias to the analytical results.
The background concentrations of the analytes in the sample matrix must be
determined in a separate aliquot and the measured values in the LFM corrected
for background concentrations.

3.10	Stock Standard Solution — A concentrated solution containing a single certified
standard that is a method analyte, or a concentrated solution of a single analyte
prepared in the laboratory with an assayed reference compound. Stock standard
solutions are used to prepare primary dilution standards.

3.11	Primary Dilution Standard Solution — A solution of several analytes prepared in
the laboratory from stock standard solutions and diluted as needed to prepare
calibration solutions and other needed analyte solutions.

3.12	Calibration Standard (CAL) — A solution prepared from the primary dilution
standard solution and stock standard solutions of the internal standards and
surrogate analytes. The CAL solutions are used to calibrate the instrument
response with respect to analyte concentration.

515.1-4


-------
3.13 Quality Control Sample (QCS) — A sample matrix containing method analytes or
a solution of method analytes in a water miscible solvent which is used to fortify
reagent water or environmental samples. The QCS is obtained from a source
external to the laboratory, and is used to check laboratory performance with
externally prepared test materials.

INTERFERENCES

4.1 Method interferences may be caused by contaminants in solvents, reagents,
glassware and other sample processing apparatus that lead to discrete artifacts or
elevated baselines in gas chromatograms. All reagents and apparatus must be
routinely demonstrated to be free from interferences under the conditions of the
analysis by running laboratory reagent blanks as described in Section 10.2.

4.1.1	Glassware must be scrupulously cleaned.2 Clean all glassware as soon as
possible after use by thoroughly rinsing with the last solvent used in it.
Follow by washing with hot water and detergent and thorough rinsing
with dilute acid, tap and reagent water. Drain dry, and heat in an oven
or muffle furnace at 400°C for one hour. Do not heat volumetric ware.
Thermally stable materials such as PCBs might not be eliminated by this
treatment. Thorough rinsing with acetone may be substituted for the
heating. After drying and cooling, seal and store glassware in a clean
environment to prevent any accumulation of dust or other contaminants.
Store inverted or capped with aluminum foil.

4.1.2	The use of high purity reagents and solvents helps to minimize
interference problems. Purification of solvents by distillation in all-glass
systems may be required.

WARNING: When a solvent is purified, stabilizers added by the
manufacturer are removed, thus potentially making the solvent hazardous.
Also, when a solvent is purified, preservatives added by the manufacturer
are removed, thus potentially reducing the shelf-life.

4.2 The acid forms of the analytes are strong organic acids which react readily with
alkaline substances and can be lost during sample preparation. Glassware and
glass wool must be acid-rinsed with 1 N hydrochloric acid and the sodium sulfate
must be acidified with sulfuric acid prior to use to avoid analyte losses due to
adsorption.

4.3 Organic acids and phenols, especially chlorinated compounds, cause the most
direct interference with the determination. Alkaline hydrolysis and subsequent
extraction of the basic sample removes many chlorinated hydrocarbons and
phthalate esters that might otherwise interfere with the electron capture analysis.

4.4 Interferences by phthalate esters can pose a major problem in pesticide analysis
when using the ECD. These compounds generally appear in the chromatogram
as large peaks. Common flexible plastics contain varying amounts of phthalates,

515.1-5


-------
that are easily extracted or leached during laboratory operations. Cross
contamination of clean glassware routinely occurs when plastics are handled
during extraction steps, especially when solvent-wetted surfaces are handled.
Interferences from phthalates can best be minimized by avoiding the use of
plastics in the laboratory. Exhaustive purification of reagents and glassware may
be required to eliminate background phthalate contamination.34

4.5	Interfering contamination may occur when a sample containing low
concentrations of analytes is analyzed immediately following a sample containing
relatively high concentrations of analytes. Between-sample rinsing of the sample
syringe and associated equipment with methyl-t-butyl-ether (MTBE) can minimize
sample cross contamination. After analysis of a sample containing high
concentrations of analytes, one or more injections of MTBE should be made to
ensure that accurate values are obtained for the next sample.

4.6	Matrix interferences may be caused by contaminants that are coextracted from the
sample. Also, note that all analytes listed in the Scope and Application section
are not resolved from each other on any one column, i.e., one analyte of interest
may be an interferant for another analyte of interest. The extent of matrix
interferences will vary considerably from source to source, depending upon the
water sampled. The procedures in Section 11.0 can be used to overcome many
of these interferences. Positive identifications should be confirmed (Section 11.8).

4.7	It is important that samples and working standards be contained in the same
solvent. The solvent for working standards must be the same as the final solvent
used in sample preparation. If this is not the case, chromatographic comparability
of standards to sample may be affected.

SAFETY

5.1	The toxicity or carcinogenicity of each reagent used in this method has not been
precisely defined; however, each chemical compound must be treated as a
potential health hazard. Accordingly, exposure to these chemicals must be
reduced to the lowest possible level. The laboratory is responsible for
maintaining a current awareness file of OSHA regulations regarding the safe
handling of the chemicals specified in this method. A reference file of material
safety data sheets should also be made available to all personnel involved in the
chemical analysis. Additional references to laboratory safety are available and
have been identified6 8 for the information of the analyst.

5.2	Diazomethane — A toxic carcinogen which can explode under certain conditions.
The following precautions must be followed:

5.2.1	Use only a well ventilated hood — do not breath vapors.

5.2.2	Use a safety screen.

5.2.3	Use mechanical pipetting aides.

515.1-6


-------
5.2.4 Do not heat above 90°C — EXPLOSION may result.

5.2.5	Avoid grinding surfaces, ground glass joints, sleeve bearings, glass stirrers
- EXPLOSION may result.

5.2.6	Store away from alkali metals — EXPLOSION may result.

5.2.7	Solutions of diazomethane decompose rapidly in the presence of solid
materials such as copper powder, calcium chloride, and boiling chips.

5.2.8	The diazomethane generation apparatus used in the esterification
procedures (Sections 11.4 and 11.5) produces micromolar amounts of
diazomethane to minimize safety hazards.

5.3 Ethyl Ether — Nanograde, redistilled in glass, if necessary.

5.3.1	Ethyl ether is an extremely flammable solvent. If a mechanical device is
used for sample extraction, the device should be equipped with an
explosion-proof motor and placed in a hood to avoid possible damage and
injury due to an explosion.

5.3.2	Must be free of peroxides as indicated by EM Quant test strips (available
from Scientific Products Co., Cat. No. PI 126-8, and other suppliers).

WARNING: When a solvent is purified, stabilizers added by the
manufacturer are removed, thus potentially making the solvent hazardous.

APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT (All specifications are suggested. Catalog numbers

are included for illustration only.)

6.1	Sample Bottle — Borosilicate, 1 L volume with graduations (Wheaton Media/Lab
bottle 219820 or equivalent), fitted with screw caps lined with TFE-fluorocarbon.
Protect samples from light. The container must be washed and dried as described
in Section 4.1.1 before use to minimize contamination. Cap liners are cut to fit
from sheets (Pierce Catalog No. 012736) and extracted with methanol overnight
prior to use.

6.2	Glassware

6.2.1	Separatory funnel — 2000 mL, with TFE-fluorocarbon stopcocks, ground
glass or TFE-fluorocarbon stoppers.

6.2.2	Tumbler bottle — 1.7 L (Wheaton Roller Culture Vessel or equivalent),
with TFE-fluorocarbon lined screw cap. Cap liners are cut to fit from
sheets (Pierce Catalog No. 012736) and extracted with methanol overnight
prior to use.

515.1-7


-------
6.2.3	Concentrator tube, Kuderna-Danish (K-D) — 10 mL or 25 mL, graduated
(Kontes K-570050-2525 or Kontes K-570050-1025 or equivalent).
Calibration must be checked at the volumes employed in the test. Ground
glass stoppers are used to prevent evaporation of extracts.

6.2.4	Evaporative flask, K-D — 500 mL (Kontes K-570001-0500 or equivalent).
Attach to concentrator tube with springs.

6.2.5	Snyder column, K-D — Three-ball macro (Kontes K-503000-0121 or
equivalent).

6.2.6	Snyder column, K-D — Two-ball micro (Kontes K-569001-0219 or
equivalent).

6.2.7	Flask, round-bottom — 500 mL with 24/40 ground glass joint.

6.2.8	Vials — glass, 5-10 mL capacity with TFE-fluorocarbon lined screw cap.

6.2.9	Disposable pipets — sterile plugged borosilicate glass, 5 mL capacity
(Corning 7078-5N or equivalent).

6.3	Separatory Funnel Shaker — Capable of holding 2 L separatory funnels and
shaking them with rocking motion to achieve thorough mixing of separatory
funnel contents (available from Eberbach Co. in Ann Arbor, MI or other
suppliers).

6.4	Tumbler — Capable of holding tumbler bottles and tumbling them end-over-end
at 30 turns/min (Associated Design and Mfg. Co., Alexandria, VA and other
suppliers).

6.5	Boiling Stones — Teflon, Chemware (Norton Performance Plastics No. 015021 and
other suppliers).

6.6	Water Bath - Heated, capable of temperature control (±2°C). The bath should be
used in a hood.

6.7	Balance — Analytical, capable of accurately weighing to the nearest 0.0001 g.

6.8	Diazomethane Generator — Assemble from two 20 x 150 mm test tubes, two
Neoprene rubber stoppers, and a source of nitrogen as shown in Figure 1
(available from Aldrich Chemical Co.). When esterification is performed using
diazomethane solution, the diazomethane collector is cooled in an approximately
2 L thermos for ice bath or a cryogenically cooled vessel (Thermoelectrics
Unlimited Model SK-12 or equivalent).

6.9	Glass Wool — Acid washed (Supelco 2-0383 or equivalent) and heated at 450°C
for four hours.

515.1-8


-------
6.10 Gas Chromatograph — Analytical system complete with temperature
programmable GC suitable for use with capillary columns and all required
accessories including syringes, analytical columns, gases, detector and stripchart
recorder. A data system is recommended for measuring peak areas. Table 1 lists
retention times observed for method analytes using the columns and analytical
conditions described below.

6.10.1	Column 1 (Primary column) — 30 m long x 0.25 mm I.D. DB-5 bonded
fused silica column, 0.25 |im film thickness (J&W Scientific). Helium
carrier gas flow is established at 30 cm/sec linear velocity and oven
temperature is programmed from 60-300°C at 4°C/min. Data presented
in this method were obtained using this column. The injection volume
was 2 |iL splitless mode with 45 second delay. The injector temperature
was 250°C and the detector was 320°C. Alternative columns may be used
in accordance with the provisions described in Section 10.2.

6.10.2	Column 2 (Confirmation column) — 30 m long x 0.25 mm I.D. DB-1701
bonded fused silica column, 0.25 um film thickness (J&W Scientific).
Helium carrier gas flow is established at 30 cm/sec linear velocity and
oven temperature is programmed from 60-300°C at 4°C/min.

6.10.3	Detector — Electron capture. This detector has proven effective in the
analysis of fortified reagent and artificial ground waters. An ECD was
used to generate the validation data presented in this method. Alternative
detectors, including a mass spectrometer, may be used in accordance with
the provisions described in Section 10.3.

REAGENTS AND CONSUMABLE MATERIALS

WARNING: When a solvent is purified, stabilizers added by the manufacturer are
removed, thus potentially making the solvent hazardous. Also, when a solvent is
purified, preservatives added by the manufacturer are removed, thus potentially reducing
the shelf-life.

7.1	Acetone, Methanol, Methylene Chloride, MTBE — Pesticide quality or equivalent.

7.2	Ethyl Ether — Unpreserved, Nanograde, redistilled in glass if necessary. Must be
free of peroxides as indicated by EM Quant test strips (available from Scientific
Products Co., Cat. No. PI 126-8, and other suppliers). Procedures recommended
for removal of peroxides are provided with the test strips.

7.3	Sodium Sulfate — Granular, anhydrous, ACS grade. Heat treat in a shallow tray
at 450°C for a minimum of four hours to remove interfering organic substances.
Acidify by slurrying 100 g sodium sulfate with enough ethyl ether to just cover
the solid. Add 0.1 mL concentrated sulfuric acid and mix thoroughly. Remove
the ether under vacuum. Mix 1 g of the resulting solid with 5 mL of reagent
water and measure the pH of the mixture. The pH must be below pH 4. Store
at 130°C.

515.1-9


-------
7.4	Sodium Thiosulfate — Granular, anhydrous, ACS grade.

7.5	Sodium Hydroxide (NaOH) — Pellets, ACS grade.

7.5.1 NaOH, 6 N — Dissolve 216 g NaOH in 900 mL reagent water.

7.6	Sulfuric Acid — Concentrated, ACS grade, sp. gr. 1.84.

7.6.1 Sulfuric acid, 12 N — Slowly add 335 mL concentrated sulfuric acid to 665
mL of reagent water.

7.7	Potassium Hydroxide (KOH) — Pellets, ACS grade.

7.7.1 KOH, 37% (w/v) — Dissolve 37 g KOH pellets in reagent water and dilute
to 100 mL.

7.8	Carbitol (Diethylene Glycol Monoethyl Ether) — ACS grade. Available from
Aldrich Chemical Co.

7.9	Diazald — ACS grade. Available from Aldrich Chemical Co.

7.10	Diazald Solution — Prepare a solution containing 10 g Diazald in 100 mL of a
50:50 by volume mixture of ethyl ether and carbitol. This solution is stable for
one month or longer when stored at 4°C in an amber bottle with a Teflon-lined
screw cap.

7.11	Sodium Chloride (NaCl) — Crystal, ACS Grade. Heat treat in a shallow tray at
450°C for a minimum of four hours to remove interfering organic substances.

7.12	4,4'-Dibromooctafluorobiphenyl (DBOB) — 99% purity, for use as internal standard
(available from Aldrich Chemical Co).

7.13	2,4-Dichlorophenylacetic Acid (DCAA) — 99% purity, for use as surrogate
standard (available from Aldrich Chemical Co).

7.14	Mercuric Chloride — ACS grade (Aldrich Chemical Co.), for use as a bacteriocide.
If any other bactericide can be shown to work as well as mercuric chloride, it may
be used instead.

7.15	Reagent Water — Reagent water is defined as water that is reasonably free of
contamination that would prevent the determination of any analyte of interest.
Reagent water used to generate the validation data in this method was distilled
water obtained from the Magnetic Springs Water Co., Columbus, Ohio.

7.16	Silicic Acid — ACS Grade.

7.17	Florisil — 60-100/PR mesh (Sigma No. F-9127). Activate by heating in a shallow
container at 150°C for at least 24 and not more than 48 hours.

515.1-10


-------
7.18	Stock Standard Solutions (1.00 |ig/|_iL) — Stock standard solutions may be
purchased as certified solutions or prepared from pure standard materials using
the following procedure:

7.18.1	Prepare stock standard solutions by accurately weighing approximately
0.0100 g of pure material. Dissolve the material in MTBE and dilute to
volume in a 10 mL volumetric flask. Larger volumes may be used at the
convenience of the analyst. If compound purity is certified at 96% or
greater, the weight may be used without correction to calculate the
concentration of the stock standard. Commercially prepared stock
standards may be used at any concentration if they are certified by the
manufacturer or by an independent source.

7.18.2	Transfer the stock standard solutions into TFE-fluorocarbon-sealed screw
cap amber vials. Store at room temperature and protect from light.

7.18.3	Stock standard solutions should be replaced after two months or sooner
if comparison with laboratory fortified blanks, or QC samples indicate a
problem.

7.19	Internal Standard Solution — Prepare an internal standard solution by accurately
weighing approximately 0.0010 g of pure DBOB. Dissolve the DBOB in MTBE
and dilute to volume in a 10 mL volumetric flask. Transfer the internal standard
solution to a TFE-fluorocarbon-sealed screw cap bottle and store at room
temperature. Addition of 25 |iL of the internal standard solution to 10 mL of
sample extract results in a final internal standard concentration of 0.25 |ig/mL.
Solution should be replaced when ongoing QC (Section 10.0) indicates a problem.
Note that DBOB has been shown to be an effective internal standard for the
method analytes1, but other compounds may be used if the quality control
requirements in Section 10.0 are met.

7.20	Surrogate Standard Solution — Prepare a surrogate standard solution by
accurately weighing approximately 0.0010 g of pure DC A A. Dissolve the DCAA
in MTBE and dilute to volume in a 10 mL volumetric flask. Transfer the
surrogate standard solution to a TFE-fluorocarbon-sealed screw cap bottle and
store at room temperature. Addition of 50 pL of the surrogate standard solution
to a 1 L sample prior to extraction results in a surrogate standard concentration
in the sample of 5 pg/L and, assuming quantitative recovery of DCAA, a
surrogate standard concentration in the final extract of 0.5 |ig/mL. Solution
should be replaced when ongoing QC (Section 10.0) indicates a problem. Note
that DCAA has been shown to be an effective surrogate standard for the method
analytes1, but other compounds may be used if the quality control requirements
in Section 10.4 are met.

7.21	Laboratory Performance Check Solutions — Prepare a diluted dinoseb solution by
adding 10 |iL of the 1.0 \ig/pL dinoseb stock solution to the MTBE and diluting
to volume in a 10 mL volumetric flask. To prepare the check solution, add 40 pL
of the diluted dinoseb solution, 16 |iL of the 4-nitrophenol stock solution, 6 |iL of

515.1-11


-------
the 3,5-dichlorobenzoic acid stock solution, 50 |iL of the surrogate standard
solution, 25 |iL of the internal standard solution, and 250 |iL of methanol to a 5
mL volumetric flask and dilute to volume with MTBE. Methylate sample as
described in Section 11.4 or 11.5. Dilute the sample to 10 mL in MTBE. Transfer
to a TFE-fluorocarbon-sealed screw cap bottle and store at room temperature.
Solution should be replaced when ongoing QC (Section 10.0) indicates a problem.

8.0 SAMPLE COLLECTION. PRESERVATION. AND STORAGE

8.1	Grab samples must be collected in glass containers. Conventional sampling
practices8 should be followed; however, the bottle must not be prerinsed with
sample before collection.

8.2	Sample Preservation and Storage

8.2.1	Add mercuric chloride (See Section 7.14) to the sample bottle in amounts
to produce a concentration of 10 mg/L. Add 1 mL of a 10 mg/mL
solution of mercuric chloride in water to the sample bottle at the sampling
site or in the laboratory before shipping to the sampling site. A major
disadvantage of mercuric chloride is that it is a highly toxic chemical;
mercuric chloride must be handled with caution, and samples containing
mercuric chloride must be disposed of properly.

8.2.2	If residual chlorine is present, add 80 mg of sodium thiosulfate per liter
of sample to the sample bottle prior to collecting the sample.

8.2.3	After the sample is collected in the bottle containing preservative(s), seal
the bottle and shake vigorously for one minute.

8.2.4	The samples must be iced or refrigerated at 4°C away from light from the
time of collection until extraction. Preservation study results indicate that
the analytes (measured as total acid) present in samples are stable for 14
days when stored under these conditions.1 However, analyte stability may
be affected by the matrix; therefore, the analyst should verify that the
preservation technique is applicable to the samples under study.

8.3	Extract Storage

8.3.1 Extracts should be stored at 4°C away from light. Preservation study
results indicate that most analytes are stable for 28 days1; however, the
analyst should verify appropriate extract holding times applicable to the
samples under study.

9.0 CALIBRATION

9.1 Establish GC operating parameters equivalent to those indicated in Section 6.10.
The GC system may be calibrated using either the internal standard technique
(Section 9.2) or the external standard technique (Section 9.3).

515.1-12


-------
NOTE: Calibration standard solutions must be prepared such that no unresolved
analytes are mixed together.

Internal Standard Calibration Procedure - To use this approach, the analyst must
select one or more internal standards compatible in analytical behavior to the
compounds of interest. The analyst must further demonstrate that the
measurement of the internal standard is not affected by method or matrix
interferences. DBOB has been identified as a suitable internal standard.

9.2.1	Prepare calibration standards at a minimum of three (recommend five)
concentration levels for each analyte of interest by adding volumes of one
or more stock standards to a volumetric flask. To each calibration
standard, add a known constant amount of one or more of the internal
standards and 250 |iL methanol, and dilute to volume with MTBE.
Esterify acids with diazomethane as described in Section 11.4 or 11.5. The
lowest standard should represent analyte concentrations near, but above,
the respective EDLs. The remaining standards should bracket the analyte
concentrations expected in the sample extracts, or should define the
working range of the detector.

9.2.2	Analyze each calibration standard according to the procedure
(Section 11.7). Tabulate response (peak height or area) against
concentration for each compound and internal standard. Calculate the
response factor (RF) for each analyte and surrogate using Equation 1.

RF =

Equation 1

(A.) (Cis)

(AJ (Cs)

where: As = Response for the analyte to be measured.

Ais = Response for the internal standard.

Cis = Concentration of the internal standard (|ig/L).

Cs = Concentration of the analyte to be measured (|ig/L).

9.2.3	If the RF value over the working range is constant (20% RSD or less) the
average RF can be used for calculations. Alternatively, the results can be
used to plot a calibration curve of response ratios (As/Ais) vs. Cs.

9.2.4	The working calibration curve or RF must be verified on each working
shift by the measurement of one or more calibration standards. If the
response for any analyte varies from the predicted response by more than
±20%, the test must be repeated using a fresh calibration standard. If the
repetition also fails, a new calibration curve must be generated for that
analyte using freshly prepared standards.

515.1-13


-------
9.3.5	Single-point calibration is a viable alternative to a calibration curve.
Prepare single point standards from the secondary dilution standards in
MTBE. The single point standards should be prepared at a concentration
that produces a response that deviates from the sample extract response
by no more than 20%.

9.2.6	Verify calibration standards periodically, recommend at least quarterly, by
analyzing a standard prepared from reference material obtained from an
independent source. Results from these analyses must be within the limits
used to routinely check calibration.

External Standard Calibration Procedure

9.3.1	Prepare calibration standards at a minimum of three (recommend five)
concentration levels for each analyte of interest and surrogate compound
by adding volumes of one or more stock standards and 250 |iL methanol
to a volumetric flask. Dilute to volume with MTBE. Esterify acids with
diazomethane as described in Section 11.4 or 11.5. The best standard
should represent analyte concentrations near, but above, the respective
EDL. The remaining standards should bracket the analyte concentrations
expected in the sample extracts, or should define the working range of the
detector.

9.3.2	Starting with the standard of lowest concentration, analyze each calibra-
tion standard according to Section 11.7 and tabulate response (peak height
or area) versus the concentration in the standard. The results can be used
to prepare a calibration curve for each compound. Alternatively, if the
ratio of response to concentration (calibration factor) is a constant over the
working range (20% RSD or less), linearity through the origin can be
assumed and the average ratio or calibration factor can be used in place
of a calibration curve.

9.3.3	The working calibration curve or calibration factor must be verified on
each working day by the measurement of a minimum of two calibration
check standards, one at the beginning and one at the end of the analysis
day. These check standards should be at two different concentration
levels to verify the calibration curve. For extended periods of analysis
(greater than eight hours), it is strongly recommended that check
standards be interspersed with samples at regular intervals during the
course of the analyses. If the response for any analyte varies from the
predicted response by more than ±20%, the test must be repeated using
a fresh calibration standard. If the results still do not agree, generate a
new calibration curve or use a single point calibration standard as
described in Section 9.3.3.

9.3.4	Single-point calibration is a viable alternative to a calibration curve.
Prepare single point standards from the secondary dilution standards in
MTBE. The single point standards should be prepared at a concentration

515.1-14


-------
that produces a response that deviates from the sample extract response
by no more than 20%.

9.2.5 Verify calibration standards periodically, recommend at least quarterly, by
analyzing a standard prepared from reference material obtained from an
independent source. Results from these analyses must be within the limits
used to routinely check calibration.

10.0 QUALITY CONTROL

10.1	Minimum quality control (QC) requirements are initial demonstration of
laboratory capability, determination of surrogate compound recoveries in each
sample and blank, monitoring internal standard peak area or height in each
sample and blank (when internal standard calibration procedures are being
employed), analysis of laboratory reagent blanks, laboratory fortified samples,
laboratory fortified blanks, and QC samples.

10.2	Laboratory Reagent Blanks (LRB) — Before processing any samples, the analyst
must demonstrate that all glassware and reagent interferences are under control.
Each time a set of samples is extracted or reagents are changed, a LRB must be
analyzed. If within the retention time window of any analyte the LRB produces
a peak that would prevent the determination of that analyte, determine the source
of contamination and eliminate the interference before processing samples.

10.3	Initial Demonstration of Capability

10.3.1	Select a representative fortified concentration (about 10 times EDL) for
each analyte. Prepare a sample concentrate (in methanol) containing each
analyte at 1000 times selected concentration. With a syringe, add 1 mL of
the concentrate to each of at least four 1 L aliquots of reagent water, and
analyze each aliquot according to procedures beginning in Section 11.0.

10.3.2	For each analyte the recovery value for all four of these samples must fall
in the range of R ±30% (or within R ±3SR if broader) using the values for
R and SR for reagent water in Table 2. For those compounds that meet the
acceptable criteria, performance is considered acceptable and sample
analysis may begin. For those compounds that fail these criteria, this
procedure must be reported using five fresh samples until satisfactory
performance has been demonstrated.

10.3.3	The initial demonstration of capability is used primarily to preclude a
laboratory from analyzing unknown samples via a new, unfamiliar
method prior to obtaining some experience with it. It is expected that as
laboratory personnel gain experience with this method the quality of data
will improve beyond those required here.

10.4	The analyst is permitted to modify GC columns, GC conditions, detectors,
continuous extraction techniques, concentration techniques (i.e., evaporation

515.1-15


-------
techniques), internal standard or surrogate compounds. Each time such method

modifications are made, the analyst must repeat the procedures in Section 10.3

10.5	Assessing Surrogate Recovery

10.5.1	When surrogate recovery from a sample or method blank is <70% or
>130%, check (1) calculations to locate possible errors, (2) spiking solutions
for degradation, (3) contamination, and (4) instrument performance. If
those steps do not reveal the cause of the problem, reanalyze the extract.

10.5.2	If a blank extract reanalysis fails the 70-130% recovery criterion, the
problem must be identified and corrected before continuing.

10.5.3	If sample extract reanalysis meets the surrogate recovery criterion, report
only data for the analyzed extract. If sample extract continues to fail the
recovery criterion, report all data for that sample as suspect.

10.6	Assessing the Internal Standard

10.6.1	When using the internal standard calibration procedure, the analyst is
expected to monitor the IS response (peak area or peak height) of all
samples during each analysis day. The IS response for any sample
chromatogram should not deviate from the daily calibration check
standard's IS response by more than 30%.

10.6.2	If >30% deviation occurs with an individual extract, optimize instrument
performance and inject a second aliquot of that extract.

10.6.2.1	If the reinjected aliquot produces an acceptable internal
standard response, report results for that aliquot.

10.6.2.2	If a deviation of greater than 30% is obtained for the
reinjected extract, analysis of the samples should be
repeated beginning with Section 11.0, provided the sample
is still available. Otherwise, report results obtained from
the reinjected extract, but annotate as suspect.

10.6.3	If consecutive samples fail the IS response acceptance criterion,
immediately analyze a calibration check standard.

10.6.3.1	If the check standard provides a response factor (RF) within
20% of the predicted value, then follow procedures
itemized in Section 10.6.2 for each sample failing the IS
response criterion.

10.6.3.2	If the check standard provides a response factor which
deviates more than 20% of the predicted value, then the
analyst must recalibrate, as specified in Sect. 9.

515.1-16


-------
10.7	Assessing Laboratory Performance — Laboratory Fortified Blank (LFB)

10.7.1	The laboratory must analyze at least one LFB sample with every
20 samples or one per sample set (all samples extracted within a 24-hour
period) whichever is greater. The concentration of each analyte in the LFB
should be 10 times EDL or the MCL, whichever is less. Calculate accuracy
as percent recovery (Xj). If the recovery of any analyte falls outside the
control limits (see Section 10.7.2), that analyte is judged out of control, and
the source of the problem should be identified and resolved before
continuing analyses.

10.7.2	Until sufficient data become available from within their own laboratory,
usually a minimum of results from 20-30 analyses, the laboratory should
assess laboratory performance against the control limits in Section 10.3.2
that are derived from the data in Table 2. When sufficient internal
performance data becomes available, develop control limits from the mean
percent recovery (X) and standard deviation (S) of the percent recovery.
These data are used to establish upper and lower control limits as follows:

UPPER CONTROL LIMIT = X + 3S
LOWER CONTROL LIMIT = X - 3S

After each 5-10 new recovery measurements, new control limits should be
calculated using only the most recent 20-30 data points. These calculated
control limits should never exceed those established in Section 10.3.2.

10.7.3	It is recommended that the laboratory periodically determine and
document its detection limit capabilities for the analytes of interest.

10.7.4	At least quarterly, analyze a QC sample from an outside source.

10.7.5	Laboratories are encouraged to participate in external performance
evaluation studies such as the laboratory certification programs offered by
many states or the studies conducted by USEPA. Performance evaluation
studies serve as independent checks on the analyst's performance.

10.8	Assessing Analyte Recovery — Laboratory Fortified Sample Matrix

10.8.1 The laboratory must add a known concentration to a minimum of 10% of
the routine samples or one sample concentration per set, whichever is
greater. The concentration should not be less then the background
concentration of the sample selected for fortification. Ideally, the
concentration should be the same as that used for the laboratory fortified
blank (Section 10.7). Over time, samples from all routine sample sources
should be fortified.

515.1-17


-------
10.8.2	Calculate the percent recovery, P of the concentration for each analyte,
after correcting the analytical result, X, from the fortified sample for the
background concentration, b, measured in the unfortified sample, i.e.,:

P = 100 (X - b) / fortifying concentration,

and compare these values to control limits appropriate for reagent water
data collected in the same fashion. If the analyzed unfortified sample is
found to contain NO background concentrations, and the added
concentrations are those specified in Section 10.7, then the appropriate
control limits would be the acceptance limits in Section 10.7. If, on the
other hand, the analyzed unfortified sample is found to contain
background concentration, b, estimate the standard deviation at the
background concentration, sb, using regressions or comparable background
data and, similarly, estimate the mean, Xa and standard deviation, s,, of
analytical results at the total concentration after fortifying. Then the
appropriate percentage control limits would be P ±3sP , where:

P = 100X / (b + fortifying concentration)

and sP = 100 (sa2 + s^)1/2/fortifying concentration

For example, if the background concentration for Analyte A was found to
be 1 l-ig/L and the added amount was also 1 (Jg/L, and upon analysis the
laboratory fortified sample measured 1.6 \i/L, then the calculated P for
this sample would be (1.6 Hg/L minus 1.0 \ig/L)/ 1 Hg/L or 60%. This
calculated P is compared to control limits derived from prior reagent
water data. Assume it is known that analysis of an interference free
sample_at 1 Hg/L yields an s of 0.12 Hg/L and similar analysis at 2.0 Hg/L
yields X and s of 2.01 (Jg/L and 0.20 (Jg/L, respectively. The appropriate
limits to judge the reasonableness of the percent recovery, 60%, obtained
on the fortified matrix sample is computed as follows:

[100 (2.01 jig/L) / 2.0 ng/L]

±3 (100) [(0.12 ng/L)2 + (0.20 ng/L)2]12/1.0 ^ig/L =

100.5% ± 300 (0.233) =

100.5% ± 70% or 30% to 170 recovery of the added analyte.

10.8.3	If the recovery of any such analyte falls outside the designated range, and
the laboratory performance for that analyte is shown to be in control
(Section 10.7), the recovery problem encountered with the fortified sample
is judged to be matrix related, not system related. The result for that
analyte in the unfortified sample is labeled suspect/matrix to inform the
data user that the results are suspect due to matrix effects.

515.1-18


-------
10.9	Assessing Instrument System — Laboratory Performance Check Sample (LPC) -
Instrument performance should be monitored on a daily basis by analysis of the
LPC sample. The LPC sample contains compounds designed to indicate
appropriate instrument sensitivity, column performance (primary column) and
chromatographic performance. LPC sample components and performance criteria
are listed in Table 3. Inability to demonstrate acceptable instrument performance
indicates the need for reevaluation of the instrument system. The sensitivity
requirements are set based on the EDLs published in this method. If laboratory
EDLs differ from those listed in this method, concentrations of the instrument QC
standard compounds must be adjusted to be compatible with the laboratory
EDLs.

10.10	The laboratory may adopt additional quality control practices for use with this
method. The specific practices that are most productive depend upon the needs
of the laboratory and the nature of the samples. For example, field or laboratory
duplicates may be analyzed to assess the precision of the environmental
measurements or field reagent blanks may be used to assess contamination of
samples under site conditions, transportation and storage.

11.0 PROCEDURE

11.1 Manual Hydrolysis, Preparation, and Extraction

11.1.1	Add preservative to blanks and QC check standards. Mark the water
meniscus on the side of the sample bottle for later determination of
sample volume (Section 11.1.9). Pour the entire sample into a 2 L
separatory funnel. Fortify sample with 50 pL of the surrogate standard
solution.

11.1.2	Add 250 g NaCl to the sample, seal, and shake to dissolve salt.

11.1.3	Add 17 mL of 6 N NaOH to the sample, seal, and shake. Check the pH
of the sample with pH paper; if the sample does not have a pH greater
than or equal to 12, adjust the pH by adding more 6 N NaOH. Let the
sample sit at room temperature for one hour, shaking the separatory
funnel and contents periodically.

11.1.4	Add 60 mL methylene chloride to the sample bottle to rinse the bottle,
transfer the methylene chloride to the separatory funnel and extract the
sample by vigorously shaking the funnel for two minutes with periodic
venting to release excess pressure. Allow the organic layer to separate
from the water phase for a minimum of 10 minutes. If the emulsion
interface between layers is more than one-third the volume of the solvent
layer, the analyst must employ mechanical techniques to complete the
phase separation. The optimum technique depends upon the sample, but
may include stirring, filtration through glass wool, centrifugation, or other
physical methods. Discard the methylene chloride phase.

515.1-19


-------
11.1.5	Add a second 60 mL volume of methylene chloride to the sample bottle
and repeat the extraction procedure a second time, discarding the
methylene chloride layer. Perform a third extraction in the same manner.

11.1.6	Add 17 mL of 12 N H2S04 to the sample, seal, and shake to mix. Check
the pH of the sample with pH paper; if the sample does not have a pH
less than or equal to 2, adjust the pH by adding more 12 N H2S04.

11.1.7	Add 120 mL ethyl ether to the sample, seal, and extract the sample by
vigorously shaking the funnel for two mintues with periodic venting to
release excess pressure. Allow the organic layer to separate from the
water phase for a minimum of 10 minutes. If the emulsion interface
between layers is more than one-third the volume of the solvent layer, the
analyst must employ mechanical techniques to complete the phase
separation. The optimum technique depends upon the sample, but may
include stirring, filtration through glass wool, centrifugation, or other
physical methods. Remove the aqueous phase to a 2 L Erlenmeyer flask
and collect the ethyl ether phase in a 500 mL round-bottom flask
containing approximately 10 g of acidified anhydrous sodium sulfate.
Periodically, vigorously shake the sample and drying agent. Allow the
extract to remain in contact with the sodium sulfate for approximately two
hours.

11.1.8	Return the aqueous phase to the separatory funnel, add a 60 mL volume
of ethyl ether to the sample, and repeat the extraction procedure a second
time, combining the extracts in the 500 mL erlenmeyer flask. Perform a
third extraction with 60 mL of ethyl ether in the same manner.

11.1.9	Determine the original sample volume by refilling the sample bottle to the
mark and transferring the water to a 1000 mL graduated cylinder. Record
the sample volume to the nearest 5 mL.

11.2 Automated Hydrolysis, Preparation, and Extraction — Data presented in this

method were generated using the automated extraction procedure with the

mechanical separatory funnel shaker.

11.2.1	Add preservative (Section 8.2) to any samples not previously preserved,
e.g., blanks and QC check standards. Mark the water meniscus on the
side of the sample bottle for later determination of sample volume (Section
11.2.9). Fortify sample with 50 |iL of the surrogate standard solution. If
the mechanical separatory funnel shaker is used, pour the entire sample
into a 2 L separatory funnel. If the mechanical tumbler is used, pour the
entire sample into a tumbler bottle.

11.2.2	Add 250 g NaCl to the sample, seal, and shake to dissolve salt.

11.2.3	Add 17 mL of 6 N NaOH to the sample, seal, and shake. Check the pH
of the sample with pH paper; if the sample does not have a pH greater

515.1-20


-------
than or equal to 12, adjust the pH by adding more 6 N NaOH. Shake
sample for one hour using the appropriate mechanical mixing device.

11.2.4	Add 300 mL methylene chloride to the sample bottle to rinse the bottle,
transfer the methylene chloride to the separatory funnel or tumbler bottle,
seal, and shake for 10 seconds, venting periodically. Repeat shaking and
venting until pressure release is not observed during venting. Reseal and
place sample container in appropriate mechanical mixing device. Shake
or tumble the sample for one hour. Complete and thorough mixing of the
organic and aqueous phases should be observed at least two minutes after
starting the mixing device.

11.2.5	Remove the sample container from the mixing device. If the tumbler is
used, pour contents of tumbler bottle into a 2 L separatory funnel. Allow
the organic layer to separate from the water phase for a minimum of 10
minutes. If the emulsion interface between layers is more than one third
the volume of the solvent layer, the analyst must employ mechanical
techniques to complete the phase separation. The optimum technique
depends upon the sample, but may include stirring, filtration through
glass wool, centrifugation, or other physical methods. Drain and discard
the organic phase. If the tumbler is used, return the aqueous phase to the
tumbler bottle.

11.2.6	Add 17 mL of 12 N H2S04 to the sample, seal, and shake to mix. Check
the pH of the sample with pH paper; if the sample does not have a pH
less than or equal to 2, adjust the pH by adding more 12 N H2S04.

11.2.7	Add 300 mL ethyl ether to the sample, seal, and shake for 10 seconds,
venting periodically. Repeat shaking and venting until pressure release
is not observed during venting. Reseal and place sample container in
appropriate mechanical mixing device. Shake or tumble sample for
one hour. Complete and thorough mixing of the organic and aqueous
phases should be observed at least two minutes after starting the mixing
device.

11.2.8	Remove the sample container from the mixing device. If the tumbler is
used, pour contents of tumbler bottle into a 2 L separatory funnel. Allow
the organic layer to separate from the water phase for a minimum of 10
minutes. If the emulsion interface between layers is more than one-third
the volume of the solvent layer, the analyst must employ mechanical
techniques to complete the phase separation. The optimum technique
depends upon the sample, but may include stirring, filtration through
glass wool, centrifugation, or other physical methods. Drain and discard
the aqueous phase. Collect the extract in a 500-mL round-bottom flask
containing about 10 g of acidified anhydrous sodium sulfate. Periodically
vigorously shake the sample and drying agent. Allow the extract to
remain in contact with the sodium sulfate for approximately two hours.

515.1-21


-------
11.2.9 Determine the original sample volume by refilling the sample bottle to the
mark and transferring the water to a 1000 mL graduated cylinder. Record
the sample volume to the nearest 5 mL.

11.3	Extract Concentration

11.3.1	Assemble a K-D concentrator by attaching a concentrator tube to a 500 mL
evaporative flask.

11.3.2	Pour the dried extract through a funnel plugged with acid washed glass
wool, and collect the extract in the K-D concentrator. Use a glass rod to
crush any caked sodium sulfate during the transfer. Rinse the
round-bottom flask and funnel with 20-30 mL of ethyl ether to complete
the quantitative transfer.

11.3.3	Add one to two clean boiling stones to the evaporative flask and attach a
macro Snyder column. Prewet the Snyder column by adding about 1 mL
ethyl ether to the top. Place the K-D apparatus on a hot water bath, 60-
65°C, so that the concentrator tube is partially immersed in the hot water,
and the entire lower rounded surface of the flask is bathed with hot
vapor. At the proper rate of distillation the balls of the column will
actively chatter but the chambers will not flood. When the apparent
volume of liquid reaches 1 mL, remove the K-D apparatus and allow it to
drain and cool for at least 10 minutes.

11.3.4	Remove the Snyder column and rinse the flask and its lower joint into the
concentrator tube with 1-2 mL of ethyl ether. Add 2 mL of MTBE and a
fresh boiling stone. Attach a micro-Snyder column to the concentrator
tube and prewet the column by adding about 0.5 mL of ethyl ether to the
top. Place the micro K-D apparatus on the water bath so that the
concentrator tube is partially immersed in the hot water. Adjust the
vertical position of the apparatus and the water temperature as required
to complete concentration in 5-10 minutes. When the apparent volume of
liquid reaches 0.5 mL, remove the micro K-D from the bath and allow it
to drain and cool. Remove the micro Snyder column and add 250 |iL of
methanol. If the gaseous diazomethane procedure (Section 11.4) is used
for esterification of pesticides, rinse the walls of the concentrator tube
while adjusting the volume to 5.0 mL with MTBE. If the pesticides will
be esterified using the diazomethane solution (Section 11.5), rinse the walls
of the concentrator tube while adjusting the volume to 4.5 mL with MTBE.

11.4	Esterification of Acids Using Gaseous Diazomethane — Results presented in this

method were generated using the gaseous diazomethane derivatization procedure.

See Section 11.5 for an alternative procedure.

11.4.1 Assemble the diazomethane generator (Figure 1) in a hood.

515.1-22


-------
11.4.2	Add 5 mL of ethyl ether to Tube 1. Add 1 mL of ethyl ether, 1 mL of
carbitol, 1.5 mL of 37% aqueous KOH, and 0.2 grams Diazald to Tube 2.
Immediately place the exit tube into the concentrator tube containing the
sample extract. Apply nitrogen flow (10 mL/min) to bubble
diazomethane through the extract for one minute. Remove first sample.
Rinse the tip of the diazomethane generator with ethyl ether after
methylation of each sample. Bubble diazomethane through the second
sample extract for one minute. Diazomethane reaction mixture should be
used to esterify only two samples; prepare new reaction mixture in Tube
2 to esterify each two additional samples. Samples should turn yellow
after addition of diazomethane and remain yellow for at least two
minutes. Repeat methylation procedure if necessary.

11.4.3	Seal concentrator tubes with stoppers. Store at room temperature in a
hood for 30 minutes.

11.4.4	Destroy any unreacted diazomethane by adding 0.1-0.2 g silicic acid to the
concentrator tubes. Allow to stand until the evolution of nitrogen gas has
stopped (approximately 20 minutes). Adjust the sample volume to 5.0 mL
with MTBE.

11.5 Esterification of Acids Using Diazomethane Solution — Alternative procedure

11.5.1	Assemble the diazomethane generator (Figure 2) in a hood. The collection
vessel is a 10 mL or 15 mL vial, equipped with a Teflon-lined screw cap
and maintained at 0-5°C.

11.5.2	Add a sufficient amount of ethyl ether to Tube 1 to cover the first
impinger. Add 5 mL of MTBE to the collection vial. Set the nitrogen flow
at 5-10 mL/min. Add 2 mL Diazald solution (Section 7.10) and 1.5 mL of
37% KOH solution to the second impinger. Connect the tubing as shown
and allow the nitrogen flow to purge the diazomethane from the reaction
vessel into the collection vial for 30 minutes. Cap the vial when collection
is complete and maintain at 0-5°C. When stored at 0-5°C this
diazomethane solution may be used over a period of 48 hours.

11.5.3	To each concentrator tube containing sample or standard, add 0.5 mL
diazomethane solution. Samples should turn yellow after addition of the
diazomethane solution and remain yellow for at least two minutes.
Repeat methylation procedure if necessary.

11.5.4	Seal concentrator tubes with stoppers. Store at room temperature in a
hood for 30 minutes.

11.5.5	Destroy any unreacted diazomethane by adding 0.1-0.2 g silicic acid to the
concentrator tubes. Allow to stand until the evolution of nitrogen gas has
stopped (approximately 20 minutes). Adjust the sample volume to 5.0 mL
with MTBE.

515.1-23


-------
11.6 Florisil Separation

11.6.1	Place a small plug of glass wool into a 5 mL disposable glass pipet. Tare
the pipet, and measure 1 g of activated Florisil into the pipet.

11.6.2	Apply 5 mL of 5% methanol in MTBE to the Florisil. Allow the liquid to
just reach the top of the Florisil. In this and subsequent steps, allow the
liquid level to just reach the top of the Florisil before applying the next
rinse, however, do not allow the Florisil to go dry. Discard eluate.

11.6.3	Apply 5 mL methylated sample to the Florisil leaving silicic acid in the
tube. Collect eluate in K-D tube.

11.6.4	Add 1 mL of 5% methanol in MTBE to the sample container, rinsing walls.
Transfer the rinse to the Florisil column leaving silicic acid in the tube.
Collect eluate in a K-D tube. Repeat with 1 mL and 3 mL aliquots of 5%
methanol in MTBE, collecting eluates in K-D tube.

11.6.5	If necessary, dilute eluate to 10 mL with 5% methanol in MTBE.

11.6.6	Seal the vial and store in a refrigerator if further processing will not be
performed immediately. Analyze by GC-ECD.

11.7	Gas Chromatography

11.7.1	Section 6.10 summarizes the recommended operating conditions for the
GC. Included in Table 1 are retention times observed using this method.
Other GC columns, chromatographic conditions, or detectors may be used
if the requirements of Section 10.4 are met.

11.7.2	Calibrate the system daily as described in Section 9.0. The standards and
extracts must be in MTBE.

11.7.3	If the internal standard calibration procedure is used, fortify the extract
with 25 |iL of internal standard solution. Thoroughly mix sample and
place aliquot in a GC vial for subsequent analysis.

11.7.4	Inject 2 |iL of the sample extract. Record the resulting peak size in area
units.

11.7.5	If the response for the peak exceeds the working range of the system,
dilute the extract and reanalyze.

11.8	Identification of Analytes

11.8.1 Identify a sample component by comparison of its retention time to the
retention time of a reference chromatogram. If the retention time of an

515.1-24


-------
unknown compound corresponds, within limits, to the retention time of
a standard compound, then identification is considered positive.

11.8.2	The width of the retention time window used to make identifications
should be based upon measurements of actual retention time variations
of standards over the course of a day. Three times the standard deviation
of a retention time can be used to calculate a suggested window size for
a compound. However, the experience of the analyst should weigh
heavily in the interpretation of chromatograms.

11.8.3	Identification requires expert judgement when sample components are not
resolved chromatographically. When GC peaks obviously represent more
than one sample component (i.e., broadened peak with shoulder(s) or
valley between two or more maxima, or any time doubt exists over the
identification of a peak on a chromatogram, appropriate alternative
techniques, to help confirm peak identifica- tion, need to be employed.
For example, more positive identification may be made by the use of an
alternative detector which operates on a chemical/physical principle
different from that originally used, e.g., mass spectrometry, or the use of
a second chromatography column. A suggested alternative column in
described in Section 6.10.

12.0 CALCULATIONS

12.1	Calculate analyte concentrations in the sample from the response for the analyte
using the calibration procedure described in Section 9.0.

12.2	If the internal standard calibration procedure is used, calculate the concentration
(C) in the sample using the response factor (RF) determined in Section 9.2 and
Equation 2, or determine sample concentration from the calibration curve.

Equation 2

C(,(A*} (I'}

C (ng/L) =

(Ais) (RF) (V0)

where: As = Response for the parameter to be measured.

Ais = Response for the internal standard.

Is = Amount of internal standard added to each extract (|ig).

VQ = Volume of water extracted (L).

12.3 If the external standard calibration procedure is used, calculate the amount of
material injected from the peak response using the calibration curve or calibration
factor determined in Section 9.3. The concentration (C) in the sample can be
calculated from Equation 3.

Equation 3

515.1-25


-------
c (ng/L) =

(A) (Vt)
(Vi) (Vs)

where: A = Amount of material injected (ng).
Vj = Volume of extract injected (i-iL).
Vt = Volume of total extract (i-iL).
Vs = Volume of water extracted (mL).

13.0 PRECISION AND ACCURACY

13.1	In a single laboratory, analyte recoveries from reagent water were determined at
five concentration levels. Results were used to determine analyte EDLs and
demonstrate method range.1 Analyte EDLs and analyte recoveries and standard
deviation about the percent recoveries at one concentration are given in Table 2.

13.2	In a single laboratory, analyte recoveries from one standard synthetic ground
waters were determined at one concentration level. Results were used to
demonstrate applicability of the method to different ground water matrices.1
Analyte recoveries from the one synthetic matrix are given in Table 2.

14.0 REFERENCES

1.	National Pesticide Survey Method No. 3, "Determination of Chlorinated Acids in
Water by Gas Chromatography with an Electron Capture Detector."

2.	"Pesticide Methods Evaluation," Letter Report #33 for EPA Contract
No. 68-03-2697. Available from U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268.

3.	ASTM Annual Book of Standards, Part 11, Volume 11.02, D3694-82, "Standard
Practice for Preparation of Sample Containers and for Preservation," American
Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, p. 86, 1986.

4.	Giam, C.S., Chan, H.S., and Nef, G.S. "Sensitive Method for Determination of
Phthalate Ester Plasticizers in Open-Ocean Biota Samples," Analytical Chemistry.
47, 2225 (1975).

5.	Giam, C.S. and Chan, H.S. "Control of Blanks in the Analysis of Phthalates in Air
and Ocean Biota Samples," U.S. National Bureau of Standards, Special Publication
442, pp. 701-708, 1976.

6.	"Carcinogens - Working with Carcinogens," Department of Health, Education, and
Welfare, Public Health Service, Center for Disease Control, National Institute for
Occupational Safety and Health, Publication No. 77-206, August 1977.

515.1-26


-------
7.	"OSHA Safety and Health Standards, General Industry," (29 CFR 1910),
Occupational Safety and Health Administration, OSHA 2206, (Revised,
January 1976).

8.	"Safety in Academic Chemistry Laboratories," American Chemical Society
Publication, Committee on Chemical Safety, 3rd Edition, 1979.

9.	ASTM Annual Book of Standards, Part 11, Volume 11.01, D3370-82, "Standard
Practice for Sampling Water," American Society for Testing and Materials,
Philadelphia, PA, p. 130, 1986.

515.1-27


-------
TABLE 1. RETENTION TIMES FOR METHOD ANALYTES

Retention Time3
(minutes)

Analyte

Primary

Confirmation

Dalapon

3.4

4.7

3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid

18.6

17.7

4-Nitrophenol

18.6

20.5

DCAA (surrogate)

22.0

14.9

Dicamba

22.1

22.6

Dichlorprop

25.0

25.6

2,4-D

25.5

27.0

DBOB (int. std.)

27.5

27.6

Pentachlorophenol (PCP)

28.3

27.0

Chloramben

29.7

32.8

2,4,5-TP

29.7

29.5

5-Hydroxydicamba

30.0

30.7

2,4,5-T

30.5

30.9

2,4-DB

32.2

32.2

Dinoseb

32.4

34.1

Bentazon

33.3

34.6

Picloram

34.4

37.5

DCPA acid metabolites

35.8

37.8

Acifluorfen

41.5

42.8

aColumns and analytical conditions are

described in Sections 6.10.1 and 6.10.2.

515.1-28


-------
TABLE 2. SINGLE LABORATORY ACCURACY, PRECISION AND ESTIMATED
DETECTION LIMITS (EDLS) FOR ANALYTES FROM REAGENT WATER AND

SYNTHETIC GROUNDWATERS3

Analyte

EDL
Hg/Lb

Concen-
tration
Rg/L

Reagent Water

Rc Srd

Synthetic
Water le

R SR

Acifluorfen

0.096

0.2

121

15.7

103

20.6

Bentazon

0.2

1

120

16.8

82

37.7

Chloramben

0.093

0.4

111

14.4

112

10.1

2,4-D

0.2

1

131

27.5

110

5.5

Dalapon

1.3

10

100

20.0

128

30.7

2,4-DB

0.8

4

87

13.1

0

0

DCPA acid metabolites

0.02

0.2

74

9.7

81

21.9

Dicamba

0.081

0.4

135

32.4

92

17.5

3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid

0.061

0.6

102

16.3

82

7.4

Dichlorprop

0.26

2

107

20.3

106

5.3

Dinoseb

0.19

0.4

42

14.3

89

13.4

5-Hydroxydicamba

0.04

0.2

103

16.5

88

5.3

4-Nitrophenol

0.13

1

131

23.6

127

34.3

Pentachlorophenol (PCP)

0.076

0.04

130

31.2

84

9.2

Picloram

0.14

0.6

91

15.5

97

23.3

2,4,5-T

0.08

0.4

117

16.4

96

3.8

2,4,5-TP

0.075

0.2

134

30.8

105

6.3

samples.

bEDL = estimated detection limit; defined as either MDL (Appendix B to 40 CFR Part 136 -
Definition and Procedure for the Determination of the Method Detection Limit -
Revision 1.11) or a level of compound in a sample yielding a peak in the final extract with
signal-to-noise ratio of approximately 5, whichever value is higher. The concentration
used in determining the EDL is not the same as the concentration presented in this table.
CR = average percent recovery.
dSr = standard deviation of the percent recovery

Corrected for amount found in blank; Absopure Nature Artesian Spring Water Obtained
from the Absopure Water Company in Plymouth, Michigan.

515.1-29


-------
TABLE 3. LABORATORY PERFORMANCE CHECK SOLUTION

Test

Analyte

Cone,
Hg/mL

Requirements

Sensitivity

Dinoseb

0.004

Detection of analyte; S/N >3

Chromatographic performance

4-Nitrophenol

1.6

0.70 < PGF <1.05

Column performance

3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid

0.6

Resolution >0.40b



4-Nitrophenol

1.6



aPGF - peak Gaussian factor. Calculated using the equation:

pGp _ 1.83 x W (1/2)
W (1/10)

where: W(l/2) is the peak width at half height and W(l/10) is the peak width at tenth height.
bResolution between the two peaks as defined by the equation:

R = —

W

where: t is the difference in elution times between the two peaks and W is the average peak width, at the baseline, of
the two peaks.


-------
Nitrogtn

Tub«1

\



Tub# 2



\y

S«mpl«
Tub*



FIGURE 1. GASEOUS DIAZ0.1ETHANE GENERATOR

515.1-31


-------
nitrogen

rubber stopper

tube 1

Collection

Thermos or
cryogenic cooler

FIGURE 2. DIAZOMETHANE SOLUTION GENERATOR


-------