FINAL
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Riverbend Area Site Characterization Report
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Great Lakes Architect-Engineer Services
Contract: EP-R5-11-10
Preparedfor
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region 5
77 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, Illinois 60604-3507
Prepared by
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology*
5918 Meridian Blvd, Suite 4
Brighton, Michigan 48116
June 2016
Version: FINAL
EA Project No. 62561.25
* EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC is affiliated with EA Engineering, Science, and Technology,
Inc., PBC who does business as EA Science and Technology in the State of Michigan.
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Contents, Page i
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2016
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
LIST OF FIGURES iv
LIST OF TABLES viii
LIST 01 ACRONYMS AM) ABBREVIATIONS ix
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
E.l SEDIMENT CHEMISTRY RESULTS 1
E.2 EQUILIBRIUM PARTITIONING SEDIMENT BENCHMARK TOXIC UNITS
AND PROBABLE EFFECTS CONCENTRATION QUOTIENTS 5
E.3 SPATIAL ANALYSIS 6
E.4 CONCLUSIONS 7
1. INTRODUCTION 1-1
1.1 WORK SCOPE AM) OBJECTIVES 1-1
1.1.1 Proj ect Obj ectives 1-1
1.1.2 Objectives of the Site Characterization Report 1-1
1.2 SITE LOCATION AM) HISTORY 1-1
2. RIVERBEND AREA SITE INVESTIGATION 2-1
2.1 SAMPLING PROGRAM DESIGN AND RATIONALE 2-1
2.1.1 Sample Locations 2-1
2.1.2 Number of Samples 2-1
2.2 NAVIGATION AND SURVEY 2-2
2.3 SEDIMENT SAMPLING 2-2
2.3.1 Sonic Core Sampling 2-2
2.3.2 Ponar Grab Sampling 2-3
2.3.3 Sediment Core Processing 2-3
2.4 ANALYTICAL PROGRAM 2-4
2.5 SAMPLE HANDLING, CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY, AND QUALITY
ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL 2-5
2.5.1 Sample Handling, Chain-of-Custody, and Documentation 2-5
2.5.2 Quality Control 2-5
2.6 DECONTAMINATION 2-6
2.7 INVESTIGATION-DERIVED WASTE 2-6
2.8 DEVIATIONS FROM THE QAPP AND FSP 2-6
2.8.1 Sampling Locations 2-6
2.8.2 Sample Recovery 2-7
2.8.3 Sample Processing and Analytical Program 2-7
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Contents, Page ii
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2016
3. RESULTS 3-1
3.1 DAT A EVALUATION 3-1
3.1.1 Comparison to Sediment Quality Guidelines 3-1
3.1.2 Calculation of Total Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Total
Polychlorinated Biphenyls 3-2
3.1.3 Ratio of Simultaneously Extracted Metals to Acid Volatile Sulfide 3-2
3.1.4 Equilibrium Partitioning Sediment Benchmark Toxic Units and Probable
Effects Concentration Quotients 3-2
3.2 RESULTS FROM THE RIVERBEND AREA SEDIMENT INVESTIGATION... 3-3
3.2.1 Sample Recovery 3-3
3.2.2 Lithology 3-4
3.2.3 Bulk Sediment Results 3-4
3.2.3.1 Grain Size, Particle Size, and Density 3-5
3.2.3.2 Ammonia 3-5
3.2.3.3 PCB Aroclors 3-5
3.2.3.4 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons 3-6
3.2.3.5 Total Organic Carbon 3-7
3.2.3.6 Metals 3-7
3.2.3.7 Ratio of Simultaneously Extracted Metals to Acid Volatile
Sulfide 3-13
3.2.3.8 Petroleum Hydrocarbons 3-13
4. EQUILIBRIUM PARTITIONING SEDIMENT BENCHMARKS 4-1
4.1 POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS 4-1
4.2 METALS 4-2
5. PROBABLE EFFECTS CONCENTRATION QUOTIENTS 5-1
6. SPATIAL ANALYSIS TO DETERMINE HOT SPOTS WITHIN THE RIVERBEND
AREA 6-1
6.1 METHODOLOGY 6-1
6.2 MODEL RESULTS FOR ALL CONSTITUENTS IN THE RIVERBEND AREA6-1
6.3 MODEL RESULTS FOR PAH EQUILIBRIUM PARTITIONING SEDIMENT
BENCHMARK TOXIC UNITS FOR THE RIVERBEND AREA 6-3
6.3.1 Spatial Analysis for PAH ESBTUs in Area A 6-3
6.3.2 Spatial Analysis for PAH ESBTUs in Area B 6-3
6.4 MODEL RESULTS FOR PROBABLE EFFECTS CONCENTRATION
QUOTIENTS FOR THE RIVERBEND AREA 6-4
6.4.1 Spatial Analysis for PEC-Qs in Area A 6-4
6.4.2 Spatial Analysis for PEC-Qs in Area B 6-4
6.5 DETERMINATION OF PREDOMINANT HOT SPOTS BASED ON ALL
CONSTITUENTS IN THE RIVERBEND AREA 6-5
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Contents, Page iii
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2016
6.5.1 Level 1 Hot Spots 6-5
6.5.1.1 Hot Spot 1 6-6
6.5.1.2 Hot Spot 2 6-6
6.5.1.3 Hot Spot 3 6-7
6.5.1.4 Hot Spot 4 6-8
6.5.2 Level 2 and Level 3 Hot Spots 6-8
6.6 COMPARISON OF RIVERBEND AREA HOT SPOTS WITH ASSESSMENTS
FOR OTHER SECTIONS OF THE DETROIT RIVER AREA OF CONCERN. . . 6-8
7. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY SAMPLES
COLLECTED FROM LOCATIONS NEAR RIVERSIDE PARK 7-1
7.1 RESULTS OF THE MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ANALYSIS OF RIVERSIDE PARK SAMPLES 7-1
8. CONCLUSIONS 8-1
9. REFERENCES 9-1
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
APPENDIX C
APPENDIX D
FIELD LOGBOOKS AND DATA COLLECTION FORMS
LITHOLOGIC CORE LOGS
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
PARTICLE SIZE GRAPHS
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
LIST OF FIGURES
Number Title
1-1 Proj ect Site Location
1-2 Riverb end Area
1-3 CSOs and Industrial Outfalls within the Riverbend Area
2-1A Sample Locations - Area A
2-1B Sample Locations - Area B
3-1A Total (ND= 0) PCB Aroclor Concentrations (|_ig/kg) Detected in Area A -
Riverbend Area Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
3-1B Total (ND= 0) PCB Aroclor Concentrations (ng/kg) Detected in Area B -
Riverbend Area Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
3-2A Total (ND= V2 RL) 17 PAH Concentrations (|_ig/kg) Detected in Area A -
Riverbend Area Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
3-2B Total (ND= V2 RL) 17 PAH Concentrations (|_ig/kg) Detected in Area B-
Riverbend Area Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
3-3 A Arsenic Concentrations (mg/kg) Detected in Area A - Riverbend Area
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
3-3B Arsenic Concentrations (mg/kg) Detected in Area B - Riverbend Area
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
3-4A Cadmium Concentrations (mg/kg) Detected in Area A - Riverbend Area
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
3-4B Cadmium Concentrations (mg/kg) Detected in Area B - Riverbend Area
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
3-5A Chromium Concentrations (mg/kg) Detected in Area A- Riverbend Area
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
3-5B Chromium Concentrations (mg/kg) Detected in Area B - Riverbend Area
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
Contents, Page iv
June 2016
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
Contents, Page v
June 2016
3-6 A
3-6B
3-7 A
3-7B
3-8A
3-8B
3-9 A
3-9B
3-10A
3-10B
3-11A
3-1 IB
3-12A
3-12B
3-13
Copper Concentrations (mg/kg) Detected in Area A- Riverbend Area
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Copper Concentrations (mg/kg) Detected in Area B - Riverbend Area
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Iron Concentrations (mg/kg) Detected in Area A - Riverbend Area
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Iron Concentrations (mg/kg) Detected in Area B - Riverbend Area
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Lead Concentrations (mg/kg) Detected in Area A- Riverbend Area
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Lead Concentrations (mg/kg) Detected in Area B - Riverbend Area
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Mercury Concentrations (mg/kg) Detected in Area A - Riverbend Area
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Mercury Concentrations (mg/kg) Detected in Area B - Riverbend Area
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Nickel Concentrations (mg/kg) Detected in Area A- Riverbend Area
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Nickel Concentrations (mg/kg) Detected in Area B - Riverbend Area
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Silver Concentrations (mg/kg) Detected in Area A- Riverbend Area
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Silver Concentrations (mg/kg) Detected in Area B - Riverbend Area
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Zinc Concentrations (mg/kg) Detected in Area A- Riverbend Area
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Zinc Concentrations (mg/kg) Detected in Area B - Riverbend Area
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (XDRO+ORO) (mg/kg) Detected in the
Riverbend Area
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
Contents, Page vi
June 2016
3-14A
3-14B
3-15A
3-15B
4-1A
4-1B
4-2A
4-2B
5-1A
5-1B
6-1A
6-1B
6-2
6-3
6-4
6-5
6-6A
Diesel Range Organics (mg/kg) in Area A Compared to Sample-Specific Risk
Screening Levels
Diesel Range Organics (mg/kg) in Area B Compared to Sample-Specific Risk
Screening Levels
Oil Range Organics (mg/kg) in Area A Compared to Sample-Specific Risk
Screening Levels
Oil Range Organics (mg/kg) in Area B Compared to Sample-Specific Risk
Screening Levels
ESBTUs for PAHs in Area A - Riverbend Area Assessment of Contaminated
Sediments
ESBTUs for PAHs in Area B - Riverbend Area Assessment of Contaminated
Sediments
ESBTUs for Metals in Area A - Riverbend Area Assessment of Contaminated
Sediments
ESBTUs for Metals in Area B - Riverbend Area Assessment of Contaminated
Sediments
PEC-Qs for Area A - Riverbend Area Assessment of Contaminated
Sediments
PEC-Qs for Area B - Riverbend Area Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Spatial Analysis for All Constituents in Area A - Riverbend Area Assessment
of Contaminated Sediment
Spatial Analysis for All Constituents in Area B - Riverbend Area Assessment
of Contaminated Sediment
Hot Spot 1 - Riverbend Area Assessment of Contaminated Sediment
Hot Spot 2 - Riverbend Area Assessment of Contaminated Sediment
Hot Spot 3 - Riverbend Area Assessment of Contaminated Sediment
Hot Spot 4 - Riverbend Area Assessment of Contaminated Sediment
Spatial Analysis for PAH ESBTUs in Area A with Outline of Identified Hot
Spots - Riverbend Area Assessment of Contaminated Sediment
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Contents, Page vii
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2016
6-6B Spatial Analysis for PAH ESBTUs in Area B with Outline of Identified Hots
Spots - Riverbend Area Assessment of Contaminated Sediment
6-7A Spatial Analysis for Mean PEC-Qs in Area A with Outline of Identified Hot
Spots - Riverbend Area Assessment of Contaminated Sediment
6-7B Spatial Analysis for Mean PEC-Qs in Area B with Outline of Identified Hot
Spots - Riverbend Area Assessment of Contaminated Sediment
7-1 MDEQ Split Sample Locations
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
LIST OF TABLES
Number Title
2-1 Riverbend Area Site Characterization Coordinates and Sample Collection Data
2-2 Riverbend Area Site Characterization Core Data
2-3 Riverbend Area Site Characterization Actual Analytical Program
3-1 Summary of Exceedances
3-2 Sediment Results for Grain Size
3-3 Sediment Results for Ammonia
3-4 Sediment Results for PCB Aroclors
3-5 Sediment Results for PAHs
3-6 Sediment Results for Metals and TOC
3-7 Sediment Results for SEM/AVS
3-8 Sediment Results for TPHs
4-1 ESBTUs for PAHs
4-2 ESBTUs for SEM/AVS Metals
5-1 PEC-Qs
7-1A MDEQ Sediment Results for Volatiles
7-IB MDEQ Sediment Results for SVOCs
7-1C MDEQ Sediment Results for Fingerprint
7-ID MDEQ Sediment Results for Gen Chem
7-IE MDEQ Sediment Results for Nitrogen
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
Contents, Page viii
June 2016
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
°C Degrees Celsius
|ig/kg Micrograms per kilogram
|iinol Micromole
|imol/g Micromole(s) per gram
AOC Area of concern
AVS Acid volatile sulfide
BUI Beneficial use impairments
COC Contaminant of concern
CSO Combined sewer overflow
cy Cubic yard(s)
DQO Data quality objective
DRO Diesel range organics
EA EA Engineering, Science, and Technology (MI), PLC and its affiliate EA
Science and Technology
EC30 Effect Concentration for 30 percent
EC50 Effect Concentration for 50 percent
EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
ESB Equilibrium Partitioning Sediment Benchmarks
ESBTU Equilibrium Partitioning Sediment Benchmarks Toxicity Unit
FD Field duplicate
FSP Field Sampling Plan
ft Foot (feet)
goc Gram organic carbon
GLNPO Great Lakes National Program Office
GPS Global positioning system
HDPE High-density polyethylene
LRROC Lower Rouge River Old Channel
MATECO MATECO Drilling Company
MDEQ Michigan Department of Environmental Quality
MDNR Michigan Department of Natural Resources
mg/kg Milligram(s) per kilogram
MS Matrix spike
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
Contents, Page ix
June 2016
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
Contents, Page x
June 2016
MSD
Matrix spike duplicate
NAPL
Non-aqueous phase liquid
ND
Not detected
NFG
National Functional Guidelines
ORO
Oil range organics
PAH
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
PCB
Polychlorinated biphenyl
PEC
Probable effects concentration
PEC-Q
Probable effects concentration quotient
PRG
Preliminary remediation goal
QAPP
Quality Assurance Project Plan
RAP
Remedial Action Plan
RL
Reporting limit
SCBA
Sediment Contaminant Bioavailability Alliance
SEM
Simultaneously extracted metals
SOP
Standard operating procedure
SQG
Sediment Quality Guidelines
SSRSL
Sample-specific risk screening level
TEC
Threshold effects concentration
TOC
Total organic carbon
TPH
Total petroleum hydrocarbons (sum of ORO and DRO)
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
Executive Summary Page 1 of 7
June 2016
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
This report presents the characterization of contaminated sediments for the Riverbend Area
(site), located within the Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC), Detroit, Michigan. This work
was conducted by EA Engineering, Science and Technology, (MI) PLC and its affiliate EA
Science and Technology (EA) for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) Great
Lakes National Program Office (GLNPO) in accordance with the Quality Assurance Project Plan
and the Field Sampling Plan for the Riverbend Area Site Characterization, Detroit River AOC,
Detroit, Michigan (EA 2016a), finalized January 2016. To address the delisting criteria and
allow for the eventual removal of the Degradation of Benthos beneficial use impairment, EPA's
GLNPO, the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, the Detroit River Public Advisory
Committee, and Friends of Detroit River initiated an effort in 2012 to define the "known
contaminated sediment sites" in the Detroit River. The partnership conducted a content analysis
of a number of contaminant studies and established six sediment target sites. The Riverbend
Area is one of the six target areas.
The purpose of this field investigation was to determine the nature and extent of chemical
contamination in the areas of soft sediment deposition. This Site Characterization Report
summarizes the findings from the field investigation, including data tables and maps, data
interpretations, and conclusions of the investigation. The overall objective of this report is to
identify priority areas within the Riverbend site at which remediation efforts might be warranted
or where further investigation should be conducted. This Executive Summary provides a
synopsis of the findings of the Site Characterization Report. Details on the site background and
methodology, and further detail on the findings and conclusions are presented in Chapters 1
through 8 of the report.
E.l SEDIMENT CHEMISTRY RESULTS
For reporting and visual presentation of the results of the sediment investigation, the Riverbend
Area was divided into two separate areas. Area A, the upstream portion of the site, extends from
the Joe Louis Arena west to the Detroit Terminal of the Nicholson Terminal & Dock Company,
and includes sample locations near West Riverfront Park, the Ambassador Bridge, and Riverside
Park. Area B, the downstream portion of the site, extends from the Detroit Terminal of the
Nicholson Terminal & Dock Company to the mouth of the Rouge River old channel, and
includes sample locations near the former Mistersky power plant, Revere Copper & Brass,
Historic Fort Wayne and the LaFarge loading dock.
Constituent concentrations detected in sediment samples were compared to threshold effect
concentrations (TECs) and probable effects concentrations (PECs). TECs typically represent
concentrations below which adverse biological effects are unlikely to be observed, while PECs
typically represent concentrations above which adverse effects are likely to be observed
(MacDonald et al. 2000). Concentrations that are between the TEC and PEC represent the
concentrations at which adverse biological effects occasionally occur.
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
Executive Summary Page 2 of 7
June 2016
Bulk Chemistry
Total polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) concentrations exceeded the TEC in most of the surface
grab samples in the Riverbend Area. Concentrations exceeding the PEC were detected in surface
grab samples at four locations in Area A and one location in Area B. Total PCBs concentrations
exceeding the PEC were also detected in at least one depth interval in cores from six locations in
Area A and three locations in Area B. Of the locations in Area A with PEC exceedances, three
of the cores had at least one depth interval with a concentration exceeding three times the PEC.
Two of these locations were near Joe Louis Arena and Riverfront Towers, while the third
occurred near Riverside Park.
For total 17 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), all but one location had a concentration
exceeding the TEC in at least one interval or the surface grab sample. Of the 28 sample
locations, 23 had a concentration exceeding the PEC in at least one core interval or the surface
grab sample. In Area A, concentrations exceeding three times the PEC were detected in at least
one core interval at 11 locations and in the surface grab sample at 3 locations. In Area B,
concentrations exceeding three times the PEC were detected in at least one depth interval at six
locations, and concentrations exceeding two times the PEC occurred in at least one depth interval
at three additional locations.
Arsenic concentrations in Area A did not exceed the PEC, but the majority of locations did have
arsenic concentrations exceeding the TEC in at least one core interval or surface sample. No
surface samples in Area B had arsenic concentrations exceeding the PEC. One location in Area
B (RBI5-24), located near the Delray Public Boat Access Ramp, had a subsurface core sample
with an arsenic concentration exceeding three times the PEC. This was the only arsenic PEC
exceedance that was detected.
Cadmium concentrations in surface grab samples were all below the PEC, and the majority were
below the TEC. Cadmium concentrations in the core samples from Area A exceeded the PEC in
most depth intervals at three locations between Joe Louis Arena and West Riverfront Park. In
Area B, cadmium concentrations exceeding the PEC were detected in at least one core depth
interval at six of the 11 locations, including four locations where concentrations exceeded three
times the PEC in at least one depth interval.
Chromium concentrations were below the TEC for the majority of surface grab samples.
Chromium concentrations exceeded the PEC in the surface grab sample at two locations: one in
Area A near West Riverfront Park (RBI5-04) and one in Area B near Zug Island (RBI5-28). In
the core samples, chromium concentrations exceeded the PEC in at least one depth interval from
four locations in Area A and from six locations in Area B. Chromium concentrations exceeding
three times the PEC were detected in two depth intervals from the core at RBI5-20, near Historic
Fort Wayne.
In Area A, copper concentrations exceeded the TEC for at least one core interval or the surface
grab sample at the majority of locations. Concentrations of copper exceeding the PEC were
detected in at least one core interval at eight locations in Area A. Concentrations of copper
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Executive Summary Page 3 of 7
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2016
exceeding three times the PEC were detected in both the surface grab and one depth interval of
the core sample from location RBI5-04, near West Riverfront Park. In Area B, copper
concentrations exceeded the PEC in the surface grab samples at three locations, including two
locations where the concentration exceeded three times the PEC (RBI5-18 and -20). Copper
concentrations exceeding three times the PEC were detected in at least one depth interval for
cores from six of the locations in Area B. Copper concentrations exceeded at least twice the
PEC for all of the depth intervals that were analyzed in cores from four locations near the former
Anaconda Brass and Revere Copper & Brass Companies.
Iron concentrations were below the TEC in the majority of surface grab samples and core
intervals. An iron concentration exceeding the PEC was detected in one depth interval from a
core collected near Riverside Park (RB15-14).
Lead concentrations exceeding the PEC were detected in surface samples as well as subsurface
samples at multiple depths. In Area A, lead concentrations exceeding the PEC were detected in
surface grab samples from five locations scattered throughout the area, including one location
near West Riverfront Park (RBI5-04) where the lead concentration exceeded three times the
PEC. Core samples with lead concentrations exceeding the PEC in at least one depth interval
occurred at 10 locations in Area A, including eight locations where at least one depth interval
exceeded three times the PEC. In Area B, lead concentrations exceeding the PEC were detected
in three surface grab samples, including one location near Zug Island where the concentration
exceeded three times the PEC (RBI5-28). In the core samples from Area B, lead concentrations
exceeding the PEC were detected in at least one depth interval at seven locations, including five
locations where the concentration exceeded three times the PEC in at least one depth interval.
Mercury concentrations exceeded the TEC in the majority of surface grab samples and core
intervals. Mercury concentrations in Area A exceeded the PEC in the surface grab samples from
three locations, including one location where the concentration exceeded twice the PEC
(RBI5-06). In the core samples in Area A, mercury concentrations exceeding the PEC were
detected in at least one depth interval in cores from seven locations, including three locations
where the concentration exceeded three times the PEC in at least one interval. In Area B, a
mercury concentration exceeding three times the PEC was detected in the surface grab sample
from one location (RBI5-19). Mercury concentrations exceeding the PEC were detected in at
least one depth interval for cores from five locations in Area B, all five of which had at least one
depth interval where the concentration exceeded three times the PEC.
Nickel concentrations were below the TEC in the majority of surface grab samples and were
below the PEC for all surface grab samples. In the core samples from Area A, nickel
concentrations exceeding the PEC were detected in at least one depth interval at five locations,
including one location near West Riverfront Park where a concentration exceeding three times
the PEC was detected (RBI5-04). In Area B, cores from five locations had concentrations of
nickel exceeding the PEC in at least one depth interval, including three locations near Historic
Fort Wayne (downstream of the former Revere Copper & Brass Company) where at least one
interval had a concentration exceeding twice the PEC.
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Executive Summary Page 4 of 7
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2016
Silver concentrations were below the TEC for the majority of core intervals and in surface grab
samples from all but three locations. Silver concentrations exceeded the PEC in two surface grab
samples in Area A, including an exceedance of three times the PEC at RBI 5-04. In Area A, core
samples from five locations had at least one depth interval with a silver concentration that
exceeded the PEC, including two locations near Riverside Park where concentrations exceeding
three times the PEC were detected in at least one depth interval. In Area B, core samples from
five locations had at least one depth interval with a silver concentration that exceeded the PEC,
including one location (RBI5-20) with a depth interval that exceeded three times the PEC.
Zinc concentrations were greater than the TEC and less than the PEC for the majority of surface
grab samples. A zinc PEC exceedance was detected in one surface grab sample in Area B
(RBI5-20), where the concentration exceeded twice the PEC. In the core samples from Area A,
zinc concentrations exceeded the PEC in at least one depth interval at eight locations, including
one location (RBI5-03) where a concentration exceeding three times the PEC was detected. In
Area B, zinc concentrations exceeding three times the PEC were detected in at least one depth
interval at five locations, and one additional location had a zinc concentration that exceeded
twice the PEC. Zinc concentrations exceeded three times the PEC for all of the core depth
intervals that were analyzed from location RBI5-23, and concentrations exceeded the PEC for all
of the core intervals that were analyzed from locations RBI 5-20, -21 and -22, near Historic Fort
Wayne (downstream of the former Revere Copper & Brass Company).
The ratio of simultaneously extracted metals to acid volatile sulfide was calculated for all surface
grab samples. The sample and the field duplicate (FD) from location RBI5-02 had ratios greater
than 1. This indicates that this metal is bioavailable and there is potential for toxicity to benthic
organisms. Concentrations of lead and silver exceeded their respective PECs in the surface
sample from RBI5-02, and concentrations of cadmium, chromium, copper, mercury, nickel and
zinc exceeded their respective TECs but were below their PECs. Surface samples from the other
sampling locations all had ratios below 1.
The highest concentration of diesel range organics (DRO) (C10-C20) was detected in the surface
interval of location RB15-20 (1,200 mg/kg). The highest concentration of oil range organics
(ORO) (C20-C36) was also detected in the surface interval of RBI 5-20 (6,700 mg/kg). DRO (C10-
C20) and ORO (C20-C36) concentrations were summed (by location) to create a total petroleum
hydrocarbon (TPH) concentration (TPH [DRO+ORO]) for each location. A PEC has not been
developed for TPH (DRO + ORO), but the DRO and ORO results were compared to Sample
Specific Risk Screening Levels (SSRSLs). In Area A, DRO concentrations exceeded the
respective SSRSL at three locations, including two locations where the concentration exceeded
three times the SSRSL (RBI5-02 and -11). ORO concentrations in Area A exceeded the
respective SSRSL at 12 locations, of which five exceeded three times the SSRSL and an
additional five exceeded twice the SSRSL. In Area B, DRO concentrations exceeded the
respective SSRSL at four locations, including one location where the concentration exceeded
three times the SSRSL (RBI5-20). ORO concentrations in Area B exceeded the respective
SSRSL at nine locations, of which two exceeded three times the SSRSL and an additional four
exceeded twice the SSRSL.
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Executive Summary Page 5 of 7
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2016
E.2 EQUILIBRIUM PARTITIONING SEDIMENT BENCHMARK TOXIC UNITS AND
PROBABLE EFFECTS CONCENTRATION QUOTIENTS
Equilibrium Partitioning Sediment Benchmark Toxicity Units (ESBTUs) were calculated to
estimate whether there is potential ecological risk associated with exposure to pore water that is
in equilibrium with a measured concentration of the contaminant in the sediment.
Typically, a PAH ESBTU less than or equal to 1 indicates that benthic organisms are not
expected to be harmed by contamination present in the sediments (EPA 2003a). The samples
with PAH ESBTUs greater than 1 may be toxic to aquatic life. Of the 103 sediment samples, 27
had a PAH ESBTU less than 1, and 25 samples had a PAH ESBTU equal to or greater than 10.
In the surface grabs in Area A, PAH ESBTUs were below 1 at five locations, between 1 and 7.5
at eight locations, between 7.5 and 10 at one location, and greater than 10 at two locations. In
the core samples from Area A, PAH ESBTUs greater than 1 were identified in all of the depth
intervals that were analyzed at 10 locations, and in at least one depth interval at most locations.
PAH ESBTUs greater than 10 were identified in at least one depth interval at 11 locations. In
the surface grab samples from Area B, PAH ESBTUs were greater than 10 at one location,
between 1 and 7.5 at five locations, and below 1 at five locations. In the core samples from Area
B, PAH ESBTUs greater than 1 were identified in at least one depth interval at nine locations,
and for all of the depth intervals that were analyzed at six locations. PAH ESBTUs greater than
10 were identified in at least one depth interval at two locations in Area B.
For metals ESBTUs, values below 130 micromoles (|imol) of residual SEM per gram organic
carbon (goc) pose a low risk of adverse biological effects, values between 130 and 3,000 |iinol/g(lc
may have adverse effects, and values over 3,000 |iinol/goc are expected to be associated with
adverse effects. ESBTU results for metals exceeded 130 |amol/goc in the surface grab samples
from RB15-04 and RB15-19. The ESBTU for metals also exceeded 130 |imol/gocin the FD
collected from the surface grab sample at RBI 5-02. All of the metals ESBTU results were
below 3,000 |imol/goc
Probable effects concentration quotients (PEC-Qs) are used to evaluate the combined effects of
chemical mixtures on the toxicity of sediments to benthic organisms against mean PEC quotients
or benchmarks (mean quotients of 0.1, 0.5, 1 and 5) (Ingersoll et al. 2001). They use consensus-
based freshwater sediment quality guidelines to calculate concentration quotients (or hazard
quotients), defined as measured sediment concentrations divided by the specific sediment quality
guideline for that particular chemical or metal. The principle of PEC-Qs is to calculate the
geometric mean of all quotients for that particular sediment sample, including those for metals,
PAHs, and PCBs. When the geometric mean PEC-Q is regressed with the percent of toxicity
found in that sample (typically growth or mortality), as shown in Ingersoll et.al. (2001), and the
geometric mean of the PEC-Qs is approximately 1, between 30 percent and 50 percent of the
organisms showed a toxic effect; meaning that between 70 percent and 50 percent of the
organisms should not show an effect when the PEC-Q is 1. The proportion of organisms which
show a toxic effect is in the range of 6 - 35 percent when a geometric mean of the PEC-Q of 0.5
is used; meaning that between 94 percent and 65 percent of organisms do not show a toxic effect
when the PEC-Q is 0.5 (Ingersoll et. al. 2001). A single PEC-Q was determined for each
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Executive Summary Page 6 of 7
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2016
sediment sample (named the mean PEC-Q) to provide an overall measure of chemical
contamination and to support an evaluation of the combined potential effects of multiple
constituents in the sediment collected from the site (EPA 2000).
Mean PEC-Qs at the Riverbend Area ranged from 0.02 at location RBI5-25 to 2,665.16 at
location RB15-12. The mean PEC-Q for each sediment sample was compared to benchmarks of
0.5 and 1. In the surface grab samples from Area A, mean PEC-Qs were calculated to be: below
0.5 at five locations, between 0.5 and 1.0 at five locations, between 1 and 5 at five locations, and
greater than 5 at one location (RB15-11). In the core samples from Area A, 12 of the 17
locations had a mean PEC-Q greater than 1 in at least one depth interval. The mean PEC-Q
values in the surface grab samples from Area B were calculated to be: less than 0.5 at five
locations, between 0.5 and 1 at one location, between 1 and 5 at four locations, and greater than 5
at one location (RBI5-27). In the core samples from Area B, mean PEC-Qs greater than 1 were
calculated for at least one depth interval at 8 of the 11 locations.
E.3 SPATIAL ANALYSIS
To determine the location of hot spots within the Riverbend Area, all individual constituents with
concentrations exceeding their respective PEC in sediment samples, the calculated PAH
ESBTUs, and the calculated PEC-Qs were spatially interpolated using the kriging method.
Although ESBTUs were also calculated for metals, this data was not included in the model
inputs for the spatial analysis because only three results exceeded the relevant thresholds and
these results occurred within the hot spots that were otherwise identified. Determination of hot
spots allows priority areas to be targeted for further investigation or remediation. Four hot spots
in the study area where one or more analytes were present in concentrations exceeding the PEC
have been identified. The four identified hot spot areas were prioritized for further investigation
and potential remediation efforts by taking into consideration the results of the spatial analysis of
PAH ESBTUs and PEC-Qs. Hot spots were categorized as Level 1, 2, or 3, with Level 1 hot
spots having the highest impact and Level 3 hot spots having the lowest impact and lowest
priority for further investigation. To be considered Level 1, hot spots must have a contaminant
result that is equal to or greater than three times the respective PEC, a PEC-Q value equal to or
greater than 5, or an ESBTU equal to or greater than 7.5. To be considered Level 2, hot spots
must have a contaminant result that is equal to or greater than three times the respective PEC, a
PEC-Q value equal to or greater than 1, or an ESBTU equal to or greater than 7.5. To be
considered Level 3, hot spots must have a contaminant result that is equal to or greater than three
times the respective PEC, a PEC-Q value equal to or greater than 0.5, or an ESBTU equal to or
greater than 1.
Hot Spots 1, 2, 3 and 4 all have at least one contaminant of concern (COC) result that is equal to
or greater than three times the respective PEC. All four of the identified hot spots also have at
least one PEC-Q equal to or greater than 5 and at least one ESBTU result equal to or greater than
7.5, and therefore all four of the hots spots meet the Level 1 criteria.
Hot Spot 1 includes sample locations RB15-01, -02, -03, -4, -05, -06, -07, and -09. The COCs in
Hot Spot 1 are total PCBs, total 17 PAHs, and eight metals (cadmium, chromium, copper, lead,
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Executive Summary Page 7 of 7
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2016
mercury, nickel, silver, and zinc). The predominant constituent contributing to elevated
concentrations above the PEC is total 17 PAHs; which exceeded three times the PEC at
RBI5-02, -03, -04, -05, and -09. Sample locations RBI5-02, -03, -04, -05, and -09 had PAH
ESBTUs greater than 10. Sample locations RB15-01, -02, and -04 had PEC-Qs greater than 5
(5.97, 12.58, and 6.24, respectively). Also, sample location RB14-04 had a metals ESBTU
greater than 130 |iinol/g(lc.
Hot Spot 2 includes sample locations RB15-11, -12, -13, -14, -15, and 16. The COCs in Hot
Spot 2 are total PCBs, total 17 PAHs, and eight metals (chromium, copper, iron, lead, mercury,
nickel, silver, and zinc). The predominant constituent contributing to elevated concentrations
above the PEC is total 17 PAHs; which exceeded three times the PEC at all six locations in Hot
Spot 2. All six locations in Hot Spot 2 had PAH ESBTUs that were greater than 10 and PEC-Qs
that were greater than 5.
Hot Spot 3 includes sample locations RB15-18, -19, -20, -21, -22, -23, and -24. The COCs in
Hot Spot 3 are total 17 PAHs, total PCBs, and nine metals (arsenic, cadmium, chromium,
copper, lead, mercury, nickel, silver, and zinc). The predominant constituent contributing to
elevated concentrations above the PEC is copper; which exceeded three times the PEC at six of
the seven locations. Total 17 PAHs exceeded three times the PEC at five of the seven locations
in Hot Spot 3; total PCBs exceeded the PEC at three locations (RBI5-19, -22, and -24). Sample
location RB15-24 had PAH ESBTUs greater than 10. Sample locations RB15-20, 22, -23, and -
24 had maximum PEC-Qs greater than 5 (5.04, 5.14, 6.48, and 7.02, respectively). Also, sample
location RB15-19 had a metals ESBTU greater than 130 |imol/goc.
Hot Spot 4 includes sample locations RB15-27 and -28. The COCs in Hot Spot 4 are total 17
PAHs and eight metals (cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury, nickel, silver, and zinc).
The predominant constituent contributing to elevated concentrations above the PEC is total 17
PAHs; which exceeded three times the PEC at RBI5-27 and twice the PEC at RBI5-28. Sample
location RBI5-27 had a PAH ESBTU greater than 10 and a PEC-Q greater than 5 (29.00).
E.4 CONCLUSIONS
Based on the data collected during the Riverbend Area sediment characterization, the Level 1
(highest impact) hot spot areas with elevated concentrations of constituents are: Hot Spot 1
(includes the area adjacent to Joe Louis Arena and West Riverfront Park in Area A); Hot Spot 2
(includes the area adjacent to the Ambassador Bridge and Riverside Park in Area A); Hot Spot 3
(includes the area adjacent to the Delray Public Access Boat Ramp and Historic Fort Wayne in
Area B); and Hot Spot 4 (includes the area adjacent to the Detroit-Windsor Truck Ferry and the
mouth of the Rouge River Old Channel near Zug Island in Area B). These high impact hot spots
have an estimated total of 749,000 cubic yards of sediment with constituent concentrations
exceeding a PEC.
The four hot spots identified in the Riverbend Area were determined to be Level 1 hot spots and
should be considered for further investigation. Model results indicated that each of these areas
has a large volume of sediment with elevated concentrations of constituents exceeding two or
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Executive Summary Page 8 of 7
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2016
three times the PEC. Modeling of the PAH ESBTUs and the PEC-Qs also showed elevated
values within the hot spot areas. Further delineation of the extent of sediment with elevated
concentrations of constituents is recommended.
The modeling results for all constituents exceeding two or three times the PEC, the PAH
ESBTUs, and the PEC-Qs suggest that the hot spot areas should be considered for further
investigation and potential remediation within the Riverbend Area. However, the limited
number of samples results in significant uncertainty of the volume of sediment with elevated
concentrations of constituents in the hot spot areas.
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
Page 1-1
June 2016
1. INTRODUCTION
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
This report presents the contaminated sediments assessment site characterization for the
Riverbend Area (the site), located within the Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC), Detroit,
Michigan (Figure 1-1). This work was conducted by EA Engineering, Science, and Technology,
(MI) PLC and its affiliate EA Science and Technology (EA) for the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency's (EPA's) Great Lakes National Program Office (GLNPO) in accordance
with the Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) and Field Sampling Plan (FSP) for the
Riverbend Area Site Characterization, Detroit River AOC, Detroit, Michigan finalized January
2016 (EA 2016a).
1.1 WORK SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES
1.1.1 Project Objectives
The purpose of the field investigation was to determine the nature and extent of chemical
contamination in the areas of soft sediment deposition. Primary objectives were to determine
depth and areal extent of contamination, provide information about depositional areas, and
identify high priority areas for remediation or for further investigation in the Riverbend Area.
1.1.2 Objectives of the Site Characterization Report
This site characterization report summarizes the findings from the field investigation, including
data tables and maps, data interpretation, and conclusions of the investigation. The results of this
site characterization were evaluated to assess the sediment quality of the Riverbend Area. The
overall objectives of this report are to define the spatial extent of constituents and soft sediment,
develop a preliminary estimate of volume of sediment with elevated concentrations of
constituents, and identify priority areas within the Riverbend Area at which remediation efforts
might be warranted.
1.2 SITE LOCATION AND HISTORY
The Detroit River is part of the international connecting waterway—consisting of the St. Clair
River, Lake St. Clair, and the Detroit River—that links Lake Erie to the upper Great Lakes. A
32-mile strait, the Detroit River drains approximately 700 square miles of land in Michigan and
Ontario, as well as the 946 square mile City of Detroit "sewershed" (Figure 1-1) (EPA 2015 and
Detroit Water and Sewerage Department 2014). However, since about 95 percent of the flow of
the Detroit River comes from outside of the watershed, originating in the upper Great Lakes and
flowing through Lake St. Clair, the Detroit River AOC comprises only the river itself. The mean
discharge of the Detroit River into Lake Erie is 185,000 cubic feet (ft) per second. Its velocity is
1 to 3 ft per second, and the average time for water to pass through the river is about 21 hours. It
has five tributaries, although, as noted previously, more than 95 percent of its total flow comes
from Lake Huron via the St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair (EPA 2015). The Riverbend Area is
an approximately 3.5 mile stretch of the mid Detroit River, beginning at the Joe Louis Arena in
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 1-2
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2016
downtown Detroit, Michigan, and extending to the confluence of the Lower Rouge River Old
Channel near Zug Island (Figure 1-2). To support the needs of a nearby AOC habitat project, the
project area also included three advanced sample locations from the Harbortown Area, an
approximately 2 mile stretch of the upper Detroit River beginning at the MacArthur Bridge to
Belle Isle and extending to the Renaissance Center in Downtown Detroit (the Harbortown Area
will be further characterized in June 2016). Results from the three locations in Harbortown will
be provided under separate cover and are not included in the sample counts or discussion in this
report.
The Detroit River has a past and present use as an industrial and drinking water source. Very
little history exists documenting the nature and extent of contamination. The river is heavily
industrialized and has been for nearly 100 years. Under the Great Lakes Water Quality
Agreement, a Detroit River Stage 1 Remedial Action Plan (RAP) was completed in 1991. The
Stage 1 RAP described the river's use and conditions, and identified 11 beneficial use
impairments (BUIs) for the Detroit River AOC (Michigan Department of Natural Resources
[MDNR] 1991). Known causes of the impairments include urban and industrial development in
the watershed, bacteria, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
(PAHs), metals, and oils and greases. Combined sewer overflows and municipal and industrial
discharges are major sources of contaminants within the AOC. Storm-water runoff and
discharge from tributaries in Michigan are also major sources of contaminants. The following
BUIs were identified in the Stage 1 RAP:
1. Restrictions on fish and wildlife consumption
2. Tainting of fish and wildlife flavor
3. Restrictions on drinking water consumption, or taste and odor
4. Degradation of fish and wildlife populations
5. Beach closings
6. Fish tumors or other deformities
7. Degradation of aesthetics
8. Bird or animal deformities or reproduction problems
9. Degradation of benthos
10. Restriction on dredging activities
11. Loss of fish and wildlife habitat.
At the time the Stage 1 RAP was drafted, six municipal drinking water intakes serving
approximately 4.1 million people in nearly 100 communities and approximately 25 industries
withdrew water from the Detroit River. As a receiving water, approximately 30 industries and
power plants discharged cooling water and/or process water, and 10 municipal wastewater
treatment plants discharged industrial and domestic wastewater. The principal industrial
discharges were on the Michigan shoreline along the lower 15 miles of the river from Zug Island
downstream through the Trenton Channel to the mouth of Lake Erie. Major industries included
steel mills, petroleum refineries, electric power generating plants, chemical manufacturing
plants, and automotive part manufacturers. The largest discharger to the river was the Detroit
Water and Sewerage Department, which discharged an average of 715 million gallons per day,
including waste from more than 700 industrial users. An additional 46 facilities discharged to
Riverbend Area Site Characterization Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
Page 1-3
June 2016
Detroit River tributaries. The river also received urban and industrial runoff directly and through
its tributaries and storm sewer systems (MDNR 1991). In the project area there a number of
former industries, including the Mistersky power plant, Revere Copper and Brass, Anaconda
Brass, Allied Chemical, and a coal gasification plant. There eight known industrial outfalls
associated with those industries. Currently there are no industrial outfalls, but 20 uncontrolled
municipal combined sewer overflow (CSO) outfalls are present throughout the project area
(Figure 1-3).
Use of the river today is similar to 1991 except that there are fewer industries and wastewater
treatment plants. Currently in the United States, there are four municipal drinking water intakes
serving about 4.2 million people in nearly 127 communities. Approximately 20 industries and
power plants discharge cooling water and/or process water to the river, and about 29 additional
facilities discharge to the tributaries. There are five municipal wastewater treatment plants.
Detroit Water and Sewerage Department is still the largest discharger, discharging an average of
1.3 billion gallons per day, including waste from about 400 significant industrial users
(EPA 2015).
The Stage 1 RAP and subsequent studies found that sediment contaminant concentrations in the
Detroit River are generally much greater along the Michigan shoreline compared to the mid-river
and Ontario shoreline (EPA 2015). The Michigan shoreline from the Rouge River downstream
through the mouth of the Trenton Channel appears to be the most impacted. Contaminant
distributions in sediment are reflective of a combination of historical point sources and
hydrological effects.
Because there is little lateral mixing in the Detroit River, contaminants in sediment are believed
to deposit according to long-shore water flow following a longitudinal vector. This has resulted
in high contaminant levels in near shore zones, particularly downstream of point sources and
tributaries, while large areas of the Detroit River exhibit moderate to low levels of contamination
further away from the Michigan shore (MDNR 1991).
To address the delisting criteria and allow for the eventual removal of the degradation of benthos
BUI, EPA GLNPO, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Detroit River Public
Advisory Committee, and Friends of Detroit River initiated an effort in 2012 to define the
"known contaminated sediment sites" in the Detroit River. The group conducted a content
analysis of a number of contaminant studies and established six sediment target sites. The
Riverbend Area is one of the six target areas (EPA 2015).
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 2-1
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2016
2. RIVERBEND AREA SITE INVESTIGATION
The purpose of this field investigation was to determine the nature and extent of chemical
contamination in the areas of soft sediment deposition. Primary objectives were to determine
depth and areal extent of contamination, provide information about depositional areas, and
identify high priority areas for remediation or for further investigation in the Riverbend Area.
The Riverbend Area site characterization was conducted in coordination with EPA. The
investigations, including all sampling activities and analytical testing methods, were carried out
in accordance with procedures outlined in the FSP and QAPP (EA 2016a).
2.1 SAMPLING PROGRAM DESIGN AND RATIONALE
The site-specific QAPP details the project data quality objectives (DQOs) and outlines how the
sample collection program fulfills the project objectives (EA 2016a). Sampling was conducted
to delineate the nature and extent of sediment contamination in the Riverbend Area of the Detroit
River AOC.
2.1.1 Sample Locations
The sample locations for the Riverbend Area site characterization were chosen based on
historical sampling data, location of historical and current outfalls (Figures 1-2 and 1-3), water
depth, proximity to the navigation channel, and input from Michigan Department of
Environmental Quality (MDEQ) and the Detroit Riverkeeper was also received prior to
finalization of sample locations. Additional information regarding the analytical program is
included in the QAPP (EA 2016a).
Twenty-eight locations within the Riverbend Area were originally chosen for sample collection
using a sonic coring system and ponar grab sampler operated by MATECO Drilling Company
(MATECO). The sampling equipment was deployed from a barge operated by Marine Services.
MATECO utilized an onboard roving Trimble R6 Global Positioning System (GPS)/Global
Navigation Satellite System with a TSC3 Data Collector to navigate to each location. Target
coordinates for each sediment sample location were provided to EA by the EPA. Variance from
these coordinates was calculated and documented; actual coordinates are provided in Table 2-1.
Sample locations that had to be moved or abandoned in the field are described in Section 2.8.
2.1.2 Number of Samples
Sediment core samples were collected from all 28 sample locations in the Riverbend Area, and
ponar grabs were collected at 27 locations. Deviation from the 28 target sample locations is
described in Section 2.8. Cores were typically divided into three or four sampling intervals at
each location. The sampling interval depths were generally as follows: 0-1 ft, 1-3 ft, and 2 ft
thereafter until refusal. These default sampling intervals were adjusted per EPA direction in the
field based on observable lithological changes in the cores (this is further discussed in Section
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
Page 2-2
June 2016
2.8). Sediment from each interval was homogenized prior to collection in individual containers
for submittal to the laboratory. Sediment cores varied in length from 2.0 ft to 11.0 ft (Table 2-2).
A total of 76 sediment samples from collected cores in the Riverbend Area (not including quality
control samples) were submitted for analysis (Table 2-3).
A surface sample of the top 6 inches (0-0.5 ft) of sediment was also collected with a ponar
grab/dredge sampler at 27 of the proposed coring locations to provide sufficient sample volume
to support analysis of the uppermost interval. A total of 27 surface grab samples (not including
quality control samples) were submitted for analysis.
2.2 NAVIGATION AND SURVEY
The Marine Services spud barge navigated to each proposed sampling location using GPS with
sub-meter accuracy. The roving GPS unit operated by MATECO utilized the World Geodetic
System 1984 to navigate and record each individual sampling location. The unit was checked
daily for accuracy prior to use in accordance with EPA's Interim Guidance for Developing
Global Positioning System Data Collection Standard Operating Procedures and Quality
Assurance Project Plans (EPA 2008) and the procedures outlined in the QAPP (EA 2016a). The
sample locations are presented in Table 2-1. Once the vessel navigated to the sample location,
the sampling team visually confirmed that the proximal location or surroundings matched the
proposed location as shown on the proposed sample location map prior to sampling (Figure 2-1A
and Figure 2-IB).
2.3 SEDIMENT SAMPLING
Mobilization for the Riverbend Area sediment sampling commenced on 26 October 2015.
Sample collection was initiated on 26 October and continued through 5 November 2015.
Staging for the field effort took place at the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' facility at Historic
Fort Wayne in Detroit, Michigan. Level D personal protective equipment (i.e., safety glasses,
work boots, and Nitrile gloves) were worn during core collection as necessary (EA 2016a). EA
standard operating procedures (SOPs) 016 and 059 for maintaining field logbooks (Attachment
A of the FSP) were followed throughout sample collection and processing.
2.3.1 Sonic Core Sampling
A total of 28 subsurface sediment cores were collected from the Riverbend Area using a sonic
coring system onboard the Marine Services spud barge. The roving GPS operated by MATECO
was used to navigate to each location. The sonic coring system consisted of a Geoprobe 7822DT
sampling rig with a mini-sonic head, a metal barrel, and connected high-density polyethylene
(HDPE) core tubes. MATECO began core collection by lowering a 4.25 inch diameter hollow-
stem auger down to the sediment surface. Two 5 ft long and one 1 ft long 3 inch inner diameter
HDPE core tubes were connected and placed into the bottom of a 3-inch diameter metal barrel
approximately 11 ft in length. The 1 ft long core tube segment was located at the top of the
connected core tubes. A core catcher was attached to the bottom of the metal barrel. A one-way
ball valve was located at the top of the barrel, above the connected core tubes, to allow water to
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 2-3
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2016
exit the tube as sediment entered. The barrel was lowered down through the auger to the
sediment surface. A sonic machine head was placed at the top of the barrel and connected to a
motor on the deck of the barge. The sonic machine head, which contains mechanisms for both
rotary motion and oscillation, moved the barrel down 10 ft through the sediment or until refusal
was met, at which point the core was retrieved. After retrieval, the core tubes were carefully
separated to prevent loss of sediment, and then each core tube was capped at both ends, sealed,
and measured. Each core tube was labeled with the location number, direction of top and bottom
of core, and date and time of retrieval. Core tubes were stored upright onboard the barge.
At the end of each day, sediment cores were transferred to a refrigeration truck (cooled to
4 degrees Celsius [°C]) at the on-shore staging area. The cores were stored upright in the
secured refrigeration truck until they could be processed. Appropriate holding times were
maintained for all samples. Field books and sample collection data sheets were prepared in
accordance with the procedures outlined in the FSP (EA 2016a). A log of coring activities,
sampling locations, water depths, and core recoveries was recorded in permanently bound
logbooks in indelible ink. Personnel names, local weather conditions, and other information that
impacted the field sampling program were also recorded. Each page of the logbook was
numbered and dated by the personnel entering information. Copies of the field logbooks are
provided in Appendix A.
2.3.2 Ponar Grab Sampling
A total of 27 surface sediment samples (not including field duplicates) were successfully
collected from locations in the Riverbend Area using a ponar sampler onboard the Marine
Services spud barge. The ponar sampler was mechanically deployed and retrieved as described
in SOP 021 (EA 2016a). The procedure included use of a davit to deploy the sampler off of the
bow of the barge, retrieving the sampler to the barge deck, decanting water at the top of the
sampler, and transferring the sediment into a disposable aluminum tray. Multiple deployments
were sometimes necessary to collect sufficient volume.
Sediment for analysis of the ratio of simultaneously extracted metals (SEM) to acid volatile
sulfide (AVS) was placed into ajar directly after the ponar sample was collected, and prior to
homogenization of the material to minimize aeration of the sample. Samples for SEM/AVS
analysis were filled with no headspace. Following collection of sediment for SEM/AVS, the
remaining sediment for all other analyses was thoroughly homogenized and then transferred
directly into laboratory-approved, labeled sample containers onboard the vessel. The surface
samples were stored in a cooler with ice onboard the Marine Services barge until they were
transferred to the sample processing area onshore and stored in a refrigeration truck (cooled to
4 °C) until transit to the laboratories facilities.
2.3.3 Sediment Core Processing
Core sediment sample processing was performed onshore at a temporary staging location at the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' facility at Historic Fort Wayne in Detroit, Michigan. At the
processing facility, cores were split lengthwise for examination and sampling. The cores were
Riverbend Area Site Characterization Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 2-4
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2016
logged and photographed from the top of the core (sediment surface) to the bottom (recovery
depth), representing a vertical profile of the soft sediment. Sediments were classified in general
accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System under ASTM International D2487-11.
These sediment logging activities were performed in accordance with SOP 016 (Attachment A of
the FSP).
After the log was completed, the sediment from each subsample interval was removed from the
core or grab sampler with a decontaminated spatula or spoon and placed in a clean disposable
aluminum try. Cores were subsampled at several depth intervals. Prior to collection, all material
from a designated depth interval in a single core was homogenized by mixing until consistency
was uniform. Sediment samples were packaged and shipped in accordance with EA SOPs (EA
2016a). Equipment that was re-used (e.g., cutting tools, broad knife, spatula, etc.) was
decontaminated in accordance with the decontamination procedures described in Section 2.6.
Lithologic and photographic logs of sediment cores are included in Appendices B and C,
respectively.
2.4 ANALYTICAL PROGRAM
The analytical program is summarized in Table 2-3. Each sediment core sample and surface
grab sample (103 total from the Riverbend Area) underwent the following analyses:
• Total polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) (Aroclors)
• 34 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)
• Michigan 10 metals (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury,
selenium, silver, and zinc) plus iron and nickel
• Total organic carbon (TOC)
• Percent solids/moisture.
In addition to the above analytical parameters, ponar grab sediment samples from the 0-0.5 ft
interval were analyzed for:
• SEM/AVS
• Diesel range organics (DRO)
• Oil range organics (ORO)
• Ammonia
• Grain size.
These analyses were only performed on ponar grab sediment samples because the data they yield
are useful for assessing toxicity to organisms that typically contact only the surface sediments.
Matrix spike (MS)/matrix spike duplicate (MSD) samples were not collected for percent solids
or grain size.
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 2-5
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2016
2.5 SAMPLE HANDLING, CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY, AND QUALITY
ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL
2.5.1 Sample Handling, Chain-of-Custody, and Documentation
Sediment samples analyzed for: PCBs (Aroclors); PAHs; Michigan 10 metals (arsenic, barium,
cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury, selenium, silver, and zinc) plus iron and nickel;
TOC; percent solids; SEM/AVS; DRO; ORO; and grain size were picked up from the site
sample processing facility by TestAmerica's courier and shipped to TestAmerica's laboratory in
Burlington, Vermont. Samples were placed in the appropriate sample containers (obtained from
TestAmerica), preserved, and labeled in accordance with the QAPP/FSP (EA 2016a). With
exception given to sediment collected for SEM/AVS analysis, sediments within an interval were
mixed to uniform consistency to homogenize prior to placing in jars. Sediment sampled for
SEM/AVS analysis was placed directly into jars after the ponar grab sample was collected, prior
to homogenization. SEM/AVS samples were filled without head space. In preparation for
shipment to the laboratories, all samples were packaged in accordance with the procedures
outlined in the FSP (EA 2016a).
Sample labeling was performed in accordance with SOP 001 (Attachment A of the FSP).
Individual sample containers were labeled with a unique designation that corresponded to the
specific geographic location, year of collection, and subsample depth interval. The FSP
(EA 2016a) outlines the specific sample identification procedures that were implemented.
Sample identifications included the location (RB), the year of sampling (15), the location
number, and either "-SURF" for surface samples or the interval from the core in feet. An
example of a sample identifier is "RBI5-22-3050"; which describes a sample collected at
Riverbend in 2015 at location 22 at the depth interval of 3-5 ft below the sediment surface.
Sample depths were typically at intervals of 0-0.5 ft (SURF), 0-1 ft, and 2 ft thereafter, with
some adjustments based on guidance from EPA in response to lithological features observed in
the field. Field duplicates were designated by adding "FD" to the end of the sample identifier.
MS/MSDs were designated by adding "MS" or "MSD" to the end of the sample identifier. For
example: RB15-23-1030FD or RB15-03-SURFMS.
Chain-of-custody forms were completed and used to track samples from the time of sampling to
the arrival of samples at the laboratory. Completed chain-of-custody forms are provided in
Appendix A of the Data Usability Assessment Report (EA 2016b).
2.5.2 Quality Control
Throughout the project, various measures were implemented to help facilitate the overall quality
and usability of the collected data. The field investigation activities included collection of
additional quality control samples (e.g., duplicates, MS/MSD, etc.) sufficient to meet the
requirements of the DQOs as defined in Section A.7 of the QAPP (EA 2016a). Duplicate
samples were submitted as described in the FSP (EA 2016a), and field and laboratory quality
control requirements were completed in accordance with Section B.5 of the QAPP. Deviations
from the QAPP/FSP can be found in Section 2.8.
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 2-6
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2016
2.6 DECONTAMINATION
Decontamination procedures were implemented during the field investigation to prevent cross-
contamination between sampling locations. During sampling activities, disposable or dedicated
sampling tools and materials were utilized whenever possible to minimize the decontamination
effort. Decontamination procedures were carried out in accordance with the SOPs presented in
Attachment A of the FSP (EA 2016a).
2.7 INVESTIGATION-DERIVED WASTE
Following collection of the sediment samples, investigation-derived waste was managed in
accordance with the procedures described in the SOPs presented in Attachment A of the FSP
(EA 2016a). In general, residual sediments and decontamination water were collected,
drummed, and disposed of offsite in accordance with the EA SOPs. Water used for
decontamination of the sampling equipment on the Marine Services spud barge was allowed to
drain back into the river at each respective sampling location. Disposable materials and personal
protective equipment that came into contact with site sediments were bagged and disposed of as
general municipal waste.
2.8 DEVIATIONS FROM THE QAPP AND FSP
2.8.1 Sampling Locations
Twenty-eight sample locations within the Riverbend Area were originally chosen based on
historical sampling data, location of historic and current outfalls, water depth, and input from
MDEQ and the Detroit River Riverkeeper (Table 2-1).
Of the 28 actual sampling locations in the Riverbend Area, 21 were more than 10 ft from the
target sampling location (Table 2-1). As noted in Table 2-1, sample locations were moved
during the field investigation for multiple reasons, including difficulty maneuvering the barge in
high wind conditions, to avoid obstructions near shore (i.e., riprap and pilings), and to achieve
more complete recovery by moving to areas of soft sediment deposition. Two locations—
RBI5-24 and RBI5-25—were moved to avoid submerged pipelines in their vicinity. EA and
MATECO worked with representatives of Kinder Morgan and Plains All American Pipeline in
relocating sample locations RBI5-24 and RBI5-25 to maintain a safe distance from the
pipelines. For the other 26 locations the actual sampling coordinates were within 90 ft of the
target location coordinates, and at 20 of these locations the actual coordinates were within 25 ft
of the target coordinates.
Four of the Riverside Park sample locations (RB15-11, -13, -14, and -15) were revised by
MDEQ on 23 October 2015; three days prior to the start of the field investigation. In navigating
to the revised Riverside Park sample locations, EA noted discrepancies in sample locations
between the aerial images provided by MDEQ and the positions indicated by the GPS. The
MDEQ representative onsite, Mr. John Barkach of Great Lakes Environmental Center, Inc.,
advised EA to sample where the aerial image indicated based on visual landmarks and proximity
Riverbend Area Site Characterization Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
Page 2-7
June 2016
to the seawall. The actual sample locations of RBI 5-11, -13,-14, and -15 were approximately
17 ft, 10 ft, 17 ft, and 9 ft from their revised target locations, respectively.
2.8.2 Sample Recovery
Sediment penetration and recovery of the cores for each location were recorded in a field
datasheet as observed through the clear core liner. The recovery value was then re-measured at
the staging area immediately prior to processing to account for settling and consolidation that
may have occurred in those core tubes that were not full. The sediment penetration and recovery
of the cores used for chemical analysis are presented in Table 2-2.
Core recovery was greater than 100 percent at nine locations: RB15-02, -03, -06, -09, -10, -11,
-13, -19 and -24 (Table 2-2 and Appendix B). Core recovery did not meet or exceed 70 percent
after three attempts at five locations: RB15-01 (maximum recovery of 51 percent), RB15-07
(maximum recovery of 60 percent), RBI5-12 (maximum recovery of 22 percent), RBI5-21
(maximum recovery of 48 percent), and RBI5-23 (maximum recovery of 50 percent)
(Table 2-2).
Surface samples were collected at 27 of the 28 target sample locations in the Riverbend Area
(Table 2-2). No surface sediment was retrieved at RB15-12 after five ponar grab sample
attempts at that location. At several locations, a dense layer of mussel shells prevented efficient
ponar sampling at the sediment surface, yielding very little sediment for analysis. To provide
sufficient sediment for analysis at the locations with high quantities of mussel shells, double
analytical volume was collected when possible, as noted in Table 2-1.
2.8.3 Sample Processing and Analytical Program
The ponar surface sample (0 to 0.5 ft below sediment surface) was collected to assess sediment-
related toxicity, bioavailability and bioaccumulation in surficial sediment benthos. Accordingly
(as presented in Table 2-3), the ponar samples were analyzed for: 34 PAHs; total Michigan
metals plus iron and nickel; PCB Aroclors; SEM/AVS; total organic carbon (TOC); percent
moisture/solids; grain size; ammonia; and diesel range organics (DROs)/oil range organics
(OROs) as specified in the QAPP (EA 2016a). Ponar surface sample collection was conducted
as detailed in Section 4.2.1 of the FSP (EA 2016a).
Separate and in addition to the ponar sample, the sediment core from each location was divided
into sample intervals. The QAPP defined sample intervals at 0 to 1 ft, 1 to 3 ft, and every 2 feet
thereafter until the end of the core (EA 2016a). However, per EPA's direction during the field
investigation, sediment core intervals were adjusted to coincide with observable lithological
changes and/or contamination in the core. Sediment intervals are further documented in the field
data collection forms (Appendix A) and the photographic log (Appendix C). Additionally, cores
were only sampled to the start of gray clay, which EPA assumed to be minimally impacted.
Core sample processing and compositing were otherwise conducted as detailed in Section 4.4 of
the FSP (EA 2016a). The proposed analytical program for the Riverbend Area Site
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 2-8
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2016
Characterization is presented in the QAPP (EA 2016a) and the actual analytical program,
including the start and end of each sample interval in inches, is presented in Table 2-3.
The QAPP and FSP stated that a maximum of 140 samples from the Riverbend Area would be
submitted for 34 PAHs, total Michigan metals plus iron and nickel, PCB Aroclors, TOC, and
percent solids/moisture by assuming that 5 analytical samples (including the surface sample)
would be submitted for each location (this does not include a maximum of 15 samples proposed
to be collected from the three Harbortown area locations). A total of 103 samples from the
Riverbend Area were submitted for these analytes. The QAPP and FSP stated that a maximum
of 28 samples (surface only) from the Riverbend Area would be submitted for grain size,
SEM/AVS, DRO/ORO, and ammonia analysis (this does not include three samples collected
from the Harbortown area). A total of 27 samples from the Riverbend Area were submitted for
these analyses. Field duplicates were submitted for 10 percent of the samples, and matrix spike
(MS)/matrix spike duplicates (MSDs) were submitted for 5 percent of the samples, with two
exceptions: MS/MSD analysis samples were not submitted for grain size, and percent
solids/moisture, as specified in the QAPP/FSP (EA 2016a).
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
3. RESULTS
3.1 DATA EVALUATION
The overall DQO for the project was to provide data of known and documented quality to
characterize current site conditions at the Riverbend Area. Data collected from the Riverbend
Area were validated by evaluating the completeness, correctness, and conformance of the data
set against the method, SOP, or contract requirements documented in the QAPP/FSP (EA
2016a). The data review and validation achieved the project goals. The overall data review and
validation program attained the project objectives with no adverse effects on data quality or
usability (EA 2016b).
To address the goals of this assessment, the validated data collected under this investigation were
compared to the consensus-based threshold effects concentrations (TECs) and the probable
effects concentrations (PECs) of the Sediment Quality Guidelines (SQGs) where available
(MacDonald et al. 2000, Persaud et al. 1993, EPA 2003b, EPA 2005, WDNR 2003).
Contaminant concentrations exceeding the applicable sediment quality guidelines were
identified. Figures have been prepared to visually present contaminant concentrations and
identify potential hot spots or focus areas within the study area.
Detected values equal to or greater than the Method Detection Limit, but less than the laboratory
Reporting Limit (RL), were J-qualified and are estimated. Analytes that were not detected were
U-qualified. Field duplicate results are presented in the analytical tables but are not included in
the bulk sediment results figures.
3.1.1 Comparison to Sediment Quality Guidelines
The SQGs were developed as informal (non-regulatory) guidelines for use in interpreting
chemical data from analyses of sediments. Several biological-effects approaches have been used
to assess freshwater sediment quality relative to the potential for adverse effects on benthic
organisms, including the TEC/PEC (MacDonald et al. 2000) approach. The TEC and PEC levels
were derived using concentrations with both effects and no observed effects (MacDonald et al.
2000). TECs typically represent concentrations below which adverse biological effects are
unlikely to be observed, while PECs typically represent concentrations above which adverse
effects are likely to be observed (MacDonald et al. 2000). Concentrations that are between the
TEC and PEC represent the concentrations at which adverse biological effects occasionally
occur. TEC and PEC levels for iron were not available from the MacDonald et al. document,
and only a TEC value was provided for silver. Therefore, iron concentrations in sediment from
the Riverbend Area were compared to the TEC and PEC values for iron documented in the
Ontario effect-based freshwater sediment quality guidelines (Persaud et al. 1993), and silver
concentrations were compared to TEC and PEC values for silver documented in draft criteria for
managing contaminated sediment in British Columbia (MacDonald and MacFarlane 1999).
These iron and silver benchmarks were recommended for use by MDEQ and EPA, and they also
appear in guidance from the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR 2003).
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
Page 3-1
June 2016
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 3-2
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2016
3.1.2 Calculation of Total Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Total Polychlorinated
Biphenyls
When calculating total PAHs, results that were J-qualified were calculated using the result value,
and results that were U-qualified were calculated using one-half the RL. Substituting one-half
the RL (not detected [ND] = V2 RL) for each non-detect provides a conservative estimate of the
concentration. This method, however, tends to produce results that are biased high, especially in
data sets where many samples are non-detects. This overestimation is important to consider
when comparing calculated total values to guidelines. Total PCBs results often have a
significant number of non-detects. Additionally, individual PCB Aroclors represent mixtures of
PCB congeners, creating the potential for double counting. For these reasons total PCBs
concentrations were calculated by summing the concentrations of each PCB Aroclor with non-
detects set equal to zero (ND=0) to reduce the potential for overestimation.
3.1.3 Ratio of Simultaneously Extracted Metals to Acid Volatile Sulfide
The bioavailability of divalent metals to aquatic organisms is influenced by the presence of AVS.
In low oxygenated (anaerobic) environments, divalent metals precipitate as metal sulfides,
making them unavailable for uptake by aquatic organisms. Using this method, six metals
(cadmium, copper, lead, nickel, mercury, and zinc) were extracted, measured, converted to units
of micromoles per gram (|imol/g) and added together (including any values that were J-qualified)
to determine the amount of SEM. If a metal was not detected, it was considered a zero in the
calculation. SEM was then compared to the amount of AVS detected (units of |imol/g) in the
same sediment sample. If AVS was not detected in the sample, the SEM/AVS ratio was not
calculated.
An SEM/AVS ratio less than 1 indicates a high degree of probability that the metals are bound as
metal sulfides and not bioavailable to aquatic organisms. If the SEM/AVS ratio is greater than 1,
then the metals in sediment exceed the sulfide binding ability and have a higher probability of
being bioavailable to aquatic organisms.
3.1.4 Equilibrium Partitioning Sediment Benchmark Toxic Units and Probable Effects
Concentration Quotients
Equilibrium Partitioning Sediment Benchmark Toxicity Units (ESBTUs) were utilized to
estimate whether there is potential ecological risk associated with exposure to pore water that is
in equilibrium with a measured concentration of a contaminant in the sediment. Typically, a
PAH ESBTU less than or equal to 1 indicates that benthic organisms are not expected to be
harmed by contamination present in the sediments (EPA 2003a). The PAH ESBTU benchmark
of 7.5 is based on the preliminary remediation goal (PRG) for PAHs developed for the Lower
Rouge River Old Channel (LRROC) Great Lakes Legacy Act site, which is also located within
the Detroit River AOC (AMEC et al. 2013). The LRROC PRG is based on the Sediment
Contaminant Bioavailability Alliance (SCBA) dataset (Geiger 2010), which is a widely accepted
sediment assessment tool comprised of over 250 samples from 18 sediment sites where PAHs
were the source of contamination. The dataset was used to evaluate risk to sensitive species
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 3-3
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2016
(Hyalella azleca, freshwater amphipod) in the benthic community based on pore water exposure.
The LRROC PRG was used for comparison based on guidance provided by MDEQ and EPA.
Eighty percent survivability is a typical level of acceptability for benthic organisms exposed to
pore water from contaminated sediments. The LRROC PRG was established at 85 percent
survivability based on SCBA toxicity results from the 28-day Hyalella test. Based on a
correlation using the SCBA dataset, 85 percent survivability correlated with a level of 5 toxic
units; however, most sediment chemistry samples are based on analysis of bulk sediments. For
the LRROC site, in order to arrive at a bulk sediment toxic unit equal to 5 toxic units in pore
water, a relationship was established between pore water and bulk sediment based on site
specific PAH samples. The result was that a toxic unit of 7.5 in bulk sediments was found to be
equal to 5 toxic units in pore water. Details of the ESBTU calculations and results are presented
in Chapter 4.
Probable effects concentration quotients (PEC-Qs) were used to evaluate the combined effects of
chemical mixtures on the toxicity of sediments to benthic organisms against mean PEC quotients
or benchmarks (mean quotients of 0.1, 0.5, 1 and 5) (Ingersoll et al. 2001). The PEC-Qs
combine data from multiple constituents in sediments into one unit-less index, and thus are
useful in comparing the quality of sediments from different locations and at different times (EPA
2000). A benchmark PEC-Q of 0.5 was used because the proportion of organisms that show
toxic effect drops to 6 - 35 percent when a geometric mean of the PEC-Q of 0.5 is used; meaning
that between 94 percent and 65 percent of organisms do not show a toxic effect when the PEC-Q
is 0.5 (Ingersoll et. al. 2001). Details of the PEC-Q calculations and results are presented in
Chapter 5.
3.2 RESULTS FROM THE RIVERBEND AREA SEDIMENT INVESTIGATION
For reporting and visual presentation of the results of the sediment investigation, the Riverbend
Area was divided into two separate areas. Area A, the upstream portion of the site, extends from
the Joe Louis Arena west to the Detroit Terminal of the Nicholson Terminal & Dock Company,
and includes sample locations near West Riverfront Park, the Ambassador Bridge and Riverside
Park (Figure 2-1 A). Area B, the downstream portion of the site, extends from the Detroit
Terminal of the Nicholson Terminal & Dock Company to the mouth of the Rouge River old
channel, and includes sample locations near the former Mistersky power plant, Revere Copper &
Brass, Historic Fort Wayne and the LaFarge loading dock (Figure 2-1B).
3.2.1 Sample Recovery
Cores were collected from 28 locations and ponar surface grab samples were collected from 27
locations.
Core collection attempts were targeted to reach a depth of 10 ft or refusal, whichever occurred
first. Refusal was not encountered at two locations (RBI5-02 and RBI5-03). Sediment recovery
ranged from 2.2 ft (RBI5-12) to 11.0 ft (RBI5-02, -03, and -24) (Table 2-2). Detailed
lithographic descriptions of the 28 collected cores are presented in Appendix B.
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 3-4
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2016
3.2.2 Lithology
The sediment cores collected within the Riverbend Area demonstrate a mixture of core profiles
containing sediment types consistent with a fluvial system. Most cores were characterized by
shorter layers of silt, sand or gravel underlain by larger layers of clay. Native and non-native
material such as shells, roots and organic material, and organic and hydrocarbon odors were
observed within various sediment types and depths. Complete core logs and photographs are
included in Appendices B and C, respectively. A general description of cores collected during
the investigation is included in the text that follows.
Area A
A total of 17 cores were collected in Area A. Cores collected in Area A showed varying
lithology, but the majority of cores had layers of sand and/or silt underlain by larger layers of
clay. At least trace levels of gravel were observed in 16 of the cores in Area A, with RBI 5-06
being the only exception. Organic material and/or organic odors were present in cores from
RB15-01, -02, -03, -12, -13, -14, -15, and -16. Mussel shells, shell fragments or shell hash were
noted in the top intervals of cores from RBI5-02, -04, 05, -06, -07, -09, -10, -11, -12, -13, -14,
-15, and -16. A hydrocarbon odor was noted in subsurface intervals in cores from RB15-01, -02,
-03, -04, -11,-12,-13,-14,-15,-16, and -17. Orange staining or sheen was noted in subsurface
intervals in cores at three locations near Riverside Park: RB15-12, -15, and -16. Black non-
aqueous phase liquid (NAPL) was observed in the core from RB15-12.
Area B
The cores collected in Area B had varying lithology, although several were comprised mostly of
layers of silt or sand underlain by layers of clay, including those from locations RB15-18, -19,
-20, -24, -25, and -28. Cores from RBI5-23 and RBI5-27 were comprised primarily of layers of
silty clay. Cores from RBI5-21, -22, and -26 were comprised primarily of either sandy clay or
clayey sand. Gravel was present in at least trace amounts in cores from most of the locations in
Area B, with locations RBI5-25 and -26 being the only exceptions. Organic material was
present in at least trace amounts in cores from RB15-20, -21, -22, -23, -24, and -27. Mussel
shells, shell fragments or shell hash was found in the top intervals of cores from locations RBI 5-
18,-19,-21, -22, and -23, while shell hash was noted in an interval approximately 5 ft below the
sediment surface in the core from RBI5-24. A hydrocarbon odor was noted for cores collected
from RB15-19, -20, -21, -22, -23, -24, and -27. An orange stain on the core liner and NAPL
sheen were observed for the core from location RBI5-22 near Historic Fort Wayne.
3.2.3 Bulk Sediment Results
Nine field duplicates and 103 sediment samples were submitted for PCB Aroclor, PAH, TOC,
percent solids/moisture and Michigan 10 metals (plus iron and nickel) analyses (these numbers
do not include the 16 samples and 2 field duplicates collected and analyzed from the three
Harbortown area sampling locations); additionally, 27 of these sediment samples and 3 field
duplicates were also submitted for DRO, ORO, ammonia, SEM/AVS and grain size analysis
(Table 2-3). Table 3-1 summarizes the Riverbend sediment results and the percentages of
threshold exceedances.
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 3-5
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2016
Chicago Bridge & Iron Company's Quality Assurance Technical Support Program was
subcontracted by EPA to conduct a 100 percent Tier I and 20 percent Tier II data validation
verification check for this project. The Tier I and Tier II reviews were performed according to
the National Functional Guidelines (NFG) for Superfund Organics Method Data Review (EPA
2014a) and NFG for Inorganic Superfund Data Review (EPA 2014b). Electronic data validation
was performed within GLNPO's eXchange and Evaluation System prior to review by Chicago
Bridge & Iron Company's Quality Assurance Technical Support Program (EA 2016b). To
assess compliance with the Laboratory Statement of Work, data validation included
completeness and compliance checks, data assessment, and validation at Stage 2 following
Guidance for Labeling Externally Validated Laboratory Analytical Data for Superfund Use
(Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response No. 9200.1-85, EPA 540-R-08-005, 13 January
2009).
3.2.3.1 Grain Size, Particle Size, and Density
Analytical results for grain size, particle size, and density are presented in Table 3-2. These
results provide additional data for characterizing sediments that can be useful in subsequent
investigations or to support potential remediation efforts. Of 27 submitted surface samples, 21
(78 percent) were primarily comprised (greater than 50 percent) of sand and gravel, and the
remaining six samples (22 percent) were primarily comprised of silt and clay. Eight of the
surface grab samples were comprised of at least 65 percent sand (RBI5-02,
-04, -08, -13, -14, -21, -25, and -27); with the highest percentage (95.0 percent) at RB15-25.
One of the surface grab samples was comprised of at least 65 percent gravel: 77.1 percent at
RB15-26. Surface grab samples with the highest percentage of silt (52.2 percent) and clay (41.3)
were collected at locations RBI5-24 and RBI5-17, respectively. Particle size distribution graphs
for each sample are presented in Appendix D.
3.2.3.2 Ammonia
Ammonia results for the Riverbend Area are provided in Table 3-3. Ammonia concentrations
ranged from a minimum of 4.7 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) in the surface grab sample at
RBI5-27 to a maximum of 297 mg/kg in the surface grab sample from RBI5-24. Ammonia
concentrations were above 100 mg/kg at 8 locations (RB15-01, -03, -05, -09, -10, -16, -20, and
-24) out of the 27 total locations where surface grab samples were collected. Ammonia data was
collected as part of this site characterization due to the concerns of MDEQ regarding historical
sources of ammonia in the area.
3.2.3.3 PCB Aroclors
PCB Aroclors data and total PCBs (ND=0) are presented in Table 3-4. Figure 3-1A and Figure
3-1B show the distribution of total PCBs SQG exceedances in Areas A and B, respectively.
Results from the surface grab samples (0-0.5 ft interval) are shown on the aerial photo and
results from the core depth intervals are shown on the associated graphs. PCB Aroclors were
detected in the surface grab samples at all locations. The most frequently detected Aroclors
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 3-6
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2016
were: Aroclor 1260 (86 detections in 112 samples), Aroclor 1242 (80 detections in 112
samples), and Aroclor 1254 (69 detections in 112 samples).
Area A
In Area A, all but two of the surface grab samples had a concentration greater than the TEC (59.8
micrograms per kilogram [|ig/kg]), with RB15-05 and -17 being the exceptions. Four surface
grab samples had a concentration that exceeded the PEC (676 |ig/kg) (RB15 -02, -09, -13, and
-14), including one surface sample that had a result that exceeded twice the PEC (RBI5-09). In
the core samples, total PCBs exceeded the PEC in at least one depth interval at six locations
(RB15-01, -02, -04, -07, -12, and -13). Core samples at three of these locations exceeded three
times the PEC in at least one subsurface depth interval (RB15-01, -02, and -13). The
concentration of total PCB Aroclors exceeded the PEC for all of the depth intervals analyzed
from the core at RBI5-01. The maximum total PCBs concentration (9,940 |ig/kg) was detected
in the 3-5 ft interval at location RBI5-01.
Area B
Total PCBs concentrations in surface samples in Area B exceeded the TEC at eight locations
(RB15-19, -20, -21, -22, -23, -24, -27, and -28), with the surface sample at one location
exceeding the PEC (RB15-19). Core samples submitted from three locations in Area B had total
PCB concentrations that exceeded the PEC in at least one depth interval (RB15-19, -22, and -24).
3.2.3.4 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
PAH data and total 17 PAHs (ND=1/2 RL) are presented in Table 3-5. Total PAHs were
calculated using both 17 individual PAHs and 34 individual PAHs; however, the total 17 PAHs
were used as a comparison threshold to be consistent with the derivation of the TEC/PEC values.
Figure 3-2A and Figure 3-2B show the distribution of total 17 PAH SQG exceedances in areas A
and B, respectively. Results from the surface grab samples (0-0.5 ft interval) are shown on the
aerial photo, and results from the core depth intervals are shown on the associated graphs.
Area A
In Area A, all but one of the locations (the exception being RBI 5-17) had surface grab samples
with a total 17 PAH result greater than the TEC (1,610 |ig/kg). Surface grab samples exceeded
the PEC (22,800 |ig/kg) at 10 locations in Area A (RB15-02, -04, -06, -07, -09, -11, -13, -14,
-15, and -16). Of these ten locations, five had surface grab samples that exceeded twice the PEC
(RB15-02, -04, -11, -13, and -14), of which three exceeded three times the PEC (RB15-04, -11,
and -13). In the core samples, total 17 PAHs exceeded the TEC in at least one subsurface depth
interval at all but one of the locations sampled, with RBI 5-06 being the sole exception. Total 17
PAH concentrations exceeded three times the PEC in at least one core depth interval at 11
locations (RB15-02, -03, -04, -05, -09, -11, -12, -13, -14, -15, and -16). Total 17 PAH
concentrations exceeded the PEC in all of the core depth intervals analyzed from location
RB15-01. The maximum total 17 PAH concentration (182,230,000 |ig/kg) was detected in the
1-3 ft interval at sample location RB15-12.
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 3-7
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2016
Area B
Total 17 PAH concentrations in surface samples in Area B exceeded the TEC at 10 of the 11
locations, with RBI5-25 being the lone exception. Total 17 PAH concentrations in surface grab
samples exceeded the PEC at four locations (RB15-19, -20, -27, and -28). The highest
concentrations of total 17 PAHs in surface grab samples in Area B were found at the two
locations near the mouth of the Rouge River Old Channel, with RBI 5-28 exceeding twice the
PEC and RBI5-27 exceeding three times the PEC. In the core samples, PEC exceedances
occurred at in at least one depth interval at 9 of the 11 locations in Area B, with RBI 5-25 and
-26 being the exceptions. Concentrations of total 17 PAHs exceeded three times the PEC in at
least one depth interval at six locations (RB15-19, -20, -22, -23, -24, and -27). Concentrations
also exceeded twice the PEC in at least one subsurface depth interval at RB15-18, -21, and -28.
Concentrations of total 17 PAHs at two locations (RBI 5-25 and -26) were below the TEC for all
of the core depth intervals that were analyzed.
3.2.3.5 Total Organic Carbon
TOC results are provided in Table 3-6. In addition to providing additional data for
characterizing sediments, TOC results are utilized in the calculation of metals ESBTUs, as
discussed in Section 4.2. In the surface grab samples, TOC ranged from 6,530 mg/kg at RBI5-
26, located in Area B, to 51,800 mg/kg at location RB15-20, also located in Area B. For the core
samples, the lowest TOC result (6,290 mg/kg [0.629 percent]) was detected in the 0-1 ft interval
at location RBI5-25 in Area B, and the highest TOC result (409,000 mg/kg [40.9 percent])
occurred in the 1-3 ft interval at RBI5-12 in Area A.
3.2.3.6 Metals
Metals results were compared to respective TEC and PEC values and are presented in Table 3-6
(MacDonald et al. 2000 and WDNR 2003). Of the 12 analyzed metals, two (barium and
selenium) do not have TEC or PEC values; therefore, these metals are not discussed in this
section and were not included in the spatial analysis for the site (Chapter 6).
The detected concentrations for each metal compared with TEC/PEC values at each location are
displayed in the following figures: Figures 3-3A and 3-3B (arsenic), Figures 3-4A and 3-4B
(cadmium), Figures 3-5A and 3-5B (chromium), Figures 3-6A and 3-6B (copper), Figures 3-7A
and 3-7B (iron), Figures 3-8A and 3-8B (lead), Figures 3-9A and 3-9B (mercury), Figures 3-10A
and 3-10B (nickel), Figures 3-11A and 3-1 IB (silver), and Figures 3-12A and 3-12B (zinc).
Results from the surface grab samples (0-0.5 ft interval) are shown on the aerial photo and
results from the sonic core depth intervals are shown on the associated graphs.
Arsenic
Figures 3-3 A and 3-3B show the distribution of arsenic SQG exceedances in Area A and Area B,
respectively.
In Area A, the majority of surface grab samples had concentrations below the TEC (9.79 mg/kg).
Concentrations exceeding the TEC, but below the PEC (33 mg/kg), were detected in surface grab
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 3-8
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2016
samples at two locations near the Ambassador Bridge (RBI5-08 and -11). In the core samples,
the majority of locations in Area A had at least one sample result that exceeded the TEC but was
below the PEC (RB15-01, -02, -03, -04, -06, -09, -12, -13, -14, -15, and -16). No surface or
subsurface samples in Area A exceeded the PEC.
Arsenic concentrations in surface samples from the majority of locations in Area B were below
the TEC. Only one location in Area B had a surface sample with an arsenic concentration in
exceedance of the TEC (RBI 5-20). Five locations in Area B had subsurface sample
concentrations in at least one depth interval that exceeded the TEC (RBI5-20, -22, -23, -24, and
-27). An arsenic concentration exceeding three times the PEC was identified in the 0-1 ft
interval at location RBI5-24, which was the maximum arsenic concentration detected (191
mg/kg) and the only sample with an arsenic concentration exceeding the PEC.
Cadmium
Figures 3-4A and 3-4B show the distribution of cadmium SQG exceedances in Area A and Area
B, respectively.
In Area A, the majority of surface grab samples had cadmium concentrations below the TEC
(0.99 mg/kg). Concentrations exceeding the TEC were detected in surface grab samples at five
locations (RB15-02, -03, -04, -06, and -13). In the core samples, cadmium concentrations
exceeding the TEC were detected in at least one depth interval at nine locations (RBI5-01, -02,
-03, -04, -12, -13, -14, -15, and -16). Of these locations, concentrations exceeding the PEC
(4.98 mg/kg) were detected in at least one core depth interval at three locations (RB15-01, -02,
and -03); with the concentration exceeding three times the PEC in the top two core depth
intervals at location RBI5-03. The maximum cadmium concentration (56.3 mg/kg) was detected
in the 1-3 ft interval at RBI5-03.
In Area B, the surface samples had concentrations below the TEC at 10 of the 11 locations, with
RBI5-20 being the lone exception. No surface grab samples had concentrations exceeding the
PEC. In the core samples, cadmium concentrations exceeding the PEC were detected in at least
one depth interval at six locations (RB15-20, -21, -22, -23, -24, and -27). Concentrations
exceeding three times the PEC were detected in at least one depth interval at four of these
locations (RBI5-20, -22, -23, and -27), and concentrations exceeding twice the PEC were also
detected in depth intervals at one additional location (RBI5-24). Cadmium concentrations
exceeded twice the PEC for all of the core depth intervals that were analyzed from location
RBI 5-23.
Chromium
Figures 3-5A and 3-5B show the distribution of chromium SQG exceedances in Area A and Area
B, respectively.
In Area A, the majority of locations had chromium concentrations in surface grab samples that
were less than the TEC (43.4 mg/kg). Chromium concentrations exceeded the TEC in surface
grab samples at four locations (RB15-02, 04, -14, and -16), with the concentration at one of these
locations (RBI5-04) having a concentration that exceeded the PEC (111 mg/kg). In the core
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
Page 3-9
June 2016
samples, chromium concentrations exceeded the TEC in at least one subsurface depth interval at
eight locations (RB15-01, -02, -03, -04, -07, -11, -12, and -13). Of these locations, chromium
concentrations exceeded the PEC in at least one core depth interval at four locations (RBI5-01,
-03, -04, and -12), with the concentrations exceeding twice the PEC in the 1-3 ft interval at
RBI5-03 and the 0-1 ft interval from RBI5-04.
Two locations in Area B had surface grab samples with chromium concentrations that exceeded
the TEC (RBI 5-20 and -28), with one of these locations exceeding the PEC (RBI 5-28). Six
locations in Area B had at least one core depth interval with a chromium concentration that
exceeded the PEC (RBI5-20, -21, -22, -23, -24, and -27), and one additional location had one
core depth interval with a chromium concentration that exceeded the TEC (RB15-19). Of the
locations with PEC exceedances from core samples, chromium concentrations exceeded twice
the PEC in samples from the 1-3 ft and 3-5 ft depth intervals at RB15-23, and three times the
PEC in samples from the 0-1 ft and 1-2 ft depth intervals at RB15-20. The maximum chromium
concentration (683 mg/kg) was detected in the 1-2 ft depth interval from RB15-20 near the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers facility at Historic Fort Wayne.
Copper
Figures 3-6A and 3-6B show the distribution of copper SQG exceedances in Area A and Area B,
respectively.
In Area A, 12 of the 16 locations (RB15-01, -02, -03, -04, -06, -08, -09, -11, -13, -14, -15, and
-16) had surface grab samples with copper concentrations that were greater than the TEC (31.6
mg/kg). The copper concentration exceeded three times the PEC (149 mg/kg) in the surface grab
sample at location RBI5-04. No other surface grab samples in Area A exceeded the copper
PEC. In the core samples, copper concentrations exceeded the PEC in at least one depth interval
at eight locations (RB15-01, -02, -03, -04, -12, -14, -15, and -16). Of these locations with PEC
exceedances for copper, concentrations exceeded twice the PEC for at least one depth interval at
three locations (RBI 5-02, -03, and -04), of which one location (RBI 5-04) had a concentration
exceeding three times the PEC in the 0-1 ft interval.
All but two of the surface grab samples collected in Area B had copper concentrations that
exceeded the TEC, with RBI5-25 and -26 being the two exceptions. Surface grab samples in
Area B exceeded the PEC at three locations (RBI 5-18, -19, and -20), of which two locations had
concentrations exceeding three times the PEC (RBI5-18 and -20). In the core samples, copper
concentrations exceeded three times the PEC in at least one depth interval at six locations
(RB15-20, -21, -22, -23, -24, and -27), and the copper concentration exceeded twice the PEC in
one depth interval at one additional location (RB15-19). Copper concentrations exceeded at least
twice the PEC in all of the depth intervals that were analyzed from the cores at four locations
(RBI5-20, -21, -22, and -23); including exceeding three times the PEC for all core depth
intervals at RBI5-23. The maximum copper concentration (6,100 mg/kg) was detected near the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers facility at Historic Fort Wayne in the 1-2 ft interval at location
RBI 5-20.
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 3-10
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2016
Iron
Figures 3-7A and 3-7B show the distribution of iron SQG exceedances in Area A and Area B,
respectively.
In Area A, the iron concentration in surface grab samples was greater than the TEC (20,000
mg/kg) at four locations (RBI5-01, -08, -16, and -17). Iron concentrations did not exceed the
PEC (40,000 mg/kg) in any of the surface grab samples from Area A. In the core samples, iron
concentrations exceeded the TEC in at least one depth interval from cores at 10 locations
(RB15-01, -03, -06, -07, -11, -12, -13, -14, -15, and-16). The iron concentration exceeded the
PEC in the 0-1 ft interval at location RB15-14, which was the maximum iron concentration
(50,600 mg/kg) that was detected.
In Area B, surface grab samples at three locations (RBI5-20, -24, and -28) had iron
concentrations above the TEC. In the core samples, iron concentrations exceeded the TEC in at
least one depth interval at six locations (RBI5-20, -22, -23, -24, -27, and -28), with iron
concentrations exceeding the TEC for all of the core depth intervals that were analyzed at two
locations (RBI 5-20 and -23). Iron concentrations did not exceed the PEC in any of the samples
that were analyzed in Area B.
Lead
Figures 3-8 A and 3-8B show the distribution of lead SQG exceedances in Area A and Area B,
respectively.
In Area A, 14 of the 16 surface grab samples had lead concentrations greater than the TEC (35.8
mg/kg), with RB15-10 and -17 being the two exceptions. Lead concentrations exceeded the PEC
(128 mg/kg) in surface grab samples at five locations (RB15-02, -04, -05, -11, and -14), which
includes a lead concentration exceeding three times the PEC in the surface sample at RBI5-04.
In the core samples, lead concentrations exceeded three times the PEC in at least one depth
interval at eight locations (RB15-01, -02, -03, -04, -12, -13, -14, and -16). In addition to these
locations, a lead concentration exceeding twice the PEC was also detected at RBI5-15, and a
lead concentration exceeding the PEC was detected in the 0-1 ft interval at RBI5-07.
Lead concentrations in surface grab samples in Area B exceeded the TEC at all but three
locations, with RBI5-25, -26, and -27 being the exceptions. Lead concentrations exceeded the
PEC in surface grab samples from three locations (RB15-19, -20, and -28), of which one
exceeded three times the PEC (RBI5-28). In the core samples, lead concentrations exceeded
three times the PEC in at least one depth interval at five locations (RBI5-20, -22, -23, -24, and
-27). In addition to these locations, lead concentrations exceeding twice the PEC were detected
in all of the core intervals at location RB15-21, and a lead concentration exceeding the PEC was
detected in the 0-1 ft interval at RB15-19. Lead concentrations exceeded three times the PEC in
all of the depth intervals that were analyzed from location RBI 5-23. The maximum lead
concentration (1,970 mg/kg) was detected in the surface grab sample from location RBI5-28
near Zug Island.
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 3-11
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2016
Mercury
Figures 3-9A and 3-9B show the distribution of mercury SQG exceedances in Area A and Area
B, respectively.
In Area A, surface grab samples at eight locations (RBI5-01, -02, -04, -06, -09, -13,-14, and
-15) had mercury concentrations greater than the TEC (0.18 mg/kg). Of these locations, mercury
concentrations exceeding the PEC (1.06 mg/kg) were detected in surface grab samples at three
locations (RBI 5-01, -04, and -06), one of which exceeded twice the PEC (RBI 5-06). In the core
samples, mercury concentrations exceeding three times the PEC were detected in at least one
depth interval at three locations (RBI5-03, -04, and -12), and concentrations exceeding twice the
PEC were also detected in at least one depth interval at four additional locations (RB15-02, -14,
-15, and -16).
In Area B, mercury concentrations in surface grab samples exceeded the TEC at five locations
(RB15-19, -20, -22, -27, and -28), of which one location (RB15-19) exceeded three times the
PEC. No other location in Area B had a mercury PEC exceedance in the surface grab sample. In
the cores, mercury concentrations exceeding three times the PEC were detected in at least one
depth interval at five locations (RBI5-20, -22, -23, -24, and -27). Mercury concentrations
detected in the core from location RBI 5-23 exceeded at least twice the PEC for all of the depth
intervals that were analyzed. The maximum mercury concentration (16.5 mg/kg) was detected in
the surface grab sample at location RB15-19.
Nickel
Figures 3-10A and 3-10B show the distribution of nickel SQG exceedances in Area A and Area
B, respectively.
In Area A, the nickel concentrations in surface grab samples were greater than the TEC (22.7
mg/kg) at seven locations (RB15-01, -02, -03, -04, -09, -11, and -17). Nickel concentrations
were below the PEC (48.6 mg/kg) for all the surface grab samples in Area A. The majority of
locations had core samples with nickel concentrations that exceeded the TEC in at least one
depth interval. Five locations had at least one core sample depth interval with a concentration
that exceeded the PEC (RB15-01, -02, -03, -04, and -13). The nickel concentration exceeded
three times the PEC in the 0-1 ft interval of the core from RBI 5-04 and exceeded twice the PEC
in the 1-3 ft interval of the core from RB15-03. The maximum nickel concentration (159 mg/kg)
was detected in the 0-1 ft interval at location RBI5-04.
In Area B, nickel concentrations in surface grab samples were above the TEC at five locations
(RBI 5-19, -20, -22, -24, and -28). Nickel concentrations did not exceed the PEC in any of the
surface grab samples in Area B. The majority of core samples collected in Area B had nickel
concentrations at or above the TEC. Core samples from three locations had nickel
concentrations that exceeded twice the PEC in at least one depth interval (RBI5-20, -22, and
-23). Nickel concentrations exceeding the PEC were also detected in at least one interval at two
additional locations (RBI 5-24 and -27). Nickel concentrations exceeded the PEC in all of the
depth intervals that were analyzed from locations RBI5-22 and -23.
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 3-12
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2016
Silver
Figures 3-11A and 3-1 IB show the distribution of silver SQG exceedances in Area A and Area
B, respectively.
In Area A, one surface grab sample had a silver concentration that exceeded three times the PEC
(2.2 mg/kg) (RBI5-04) and one additional location also had a silver concentration that exceeded
the PEC (RBI5-02). Silver concentrations in all other surface grab samples in Area A were
below the TEC (1.6 mg/kg). The majority of samples from the cores in Area A had silver
concentrations that were below the TEC. Silver concentrations exceeding the PEC were detected
in at least one depth interval from cores at five locations (RB15-01, -02, -03, -04, and -15). Of
these PEC exceedances, silver concentrations exceeding three times the PEC were detected in
one interval each at locations RBI5-03 and -04. Concentrations exceeding twice the PEC were
also detected in at least one core interval at locations RBI5-01 and -02. The maximum silver
concentration was detected in the 0-1 ft interval at RBI5-04.
In Area B, the silver concentration exceeded the TEC in the surface grab sample from one
location (RBI5-28). Silver concentrations in surface grab samples in Area B were all below the
PEC. In the cores, silver concentrations exceeding the PEC were detected in at least one depth
interval at five locations (RBI 5-20, -22, -23, -24, and -27). Of these locations, a silver
concentration exceeding three times the PEC was detected at one location (RBI5-20), and silver
concentrations exceeding twice the PEC were also detected in at least one depth interval at three
additional locations (RBI5-22, -23, and -24).
Zinc
Figures 3-12A and 3-12B show the distribution of zinc SQG exceedances in Area A and Area B,
respectively.
In Area A, surface grab samples from 10 locations (RB15-01, -02, -03, -04, -09, -11, -13, -14,
-15, and -16) had zinc concentrations that exceeded the TEC (121 mg/kg). Zinc concentrations
did not exceed the PEC (459 mg/kg) at any of the surface grab samples in Area A. In the core
samples, zinc concentrations exceeding the PEC were detected in at least one depth interval at
eight locations (RB15-01, -02, -03, -04, -12, -13, -14, and -16). A zinc concentration exceeding
three times the PEC was detected in the 3-5 ft depth interval at RBI5-03.
In Area B, zinc concentrations exceeded the TEC in surface grab samples from seven locations
(RB15-19, -20, -21, -22, -23, -24, and -28). One location in Area B had a surface grab sample
with a zinc concentration that exceeded twice the PEC (RBI5-20); surface grab samples from the
remaining locations in Area B were below the PEC. In the core samples, zinc concentrations
exceeding three times the PEC were detected in at least one depth interval at five locations
(RB15-20, -21, -22, -23, and -24). Additionally, a zinc concentration exceeding twice the PEC
was also detected in one depth interval at location RBI5-27. Zinc concentrations exceeded the
PEC for all of the depth intervals that were analyzed from the core samples at four locations
(RBI5-20, -21, -22, and -23), including one location where zinc concentrations exceeded three
times the PEC for all of the core intervals that were analyzed (RBI 5-23). The maximum zinc
concentration (14,500 mg/kg) was detected in the 1-2 ft interval from the core at RB15-20.
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 3-13
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2016
3.2.3.7 Ratio of Simultaneously Extracted Metals to Acid Volatile Sulfide
A total of 27 surface grab samples and 3 field duplicates were submitted for the ratio of SEM to
AVS analysis. The SEM/AVS ratio was calculated for samples from 17 of the 30 samples that
were submitted for analysis, but could not be calculated for the remaining 13 samples (RBI5-04,
-06, -07, -08, -08FD, -09FD, -10,-11,-16,-17,-18,-19, and -25) because AVS was not detected.
The sample and the FD from location RBI5-02 each had an SEM/AVS ratio greater than 1. This
indicates that this metal may be bioavailable and there is potential for toxicity to benthic
organisms. Concentrations of lead and silver exceeded their respective PECs in the surface
sample from RBI5-02, and concentrations of cadmium, chromium, copper, mercury, nickel and
zinc exceeded their respective TECs but were below their PECs. All SEM/AVS results are
presented in Table 3-7. These data were used for derivation of the ESBTUs presented in
Chapter 4.
3.2.3.8 Petroleum Hydrocarbons
Results for DRO and ORO are presented in Table 3-8. The highest concentration of DRO (Cio-
C20) was detected in the surface grab sample from location RB15-20 (1,200 mg/kg). The highest
concentration of ORO (C20-C36) was also detected in the surface grab sample from RBI5-20
(6,700 mg/kg).
DRO (C io_C2o) and 0R.0 (C2o~C36) concentrations were summed (by location) to create a total
petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) concentration (TPH [DRO+ORO]) for each location. Figure 3-13
presents the distribution of TPH (DRO+ORO) results in the Riverbend Area. For the evaluation
purposes of this report, TPH (DRO+ORO) sample results were compared to values of 100
mg/kg, 1,000 mg/kg, 5,000 mg/kg, and 10,000 mg/kg. Six locations in Area A had TPH
(DRO+ORO) values greater than 1,000 mg/kg and less than 5,000 mg/kg (RB15-01, 02, -03, -04,
-11, and -15). In Area B, one location had a TPH value greater than 5,000 mg/kg (RB15-20) and
one location had a TPH value greater than 1,000 mg/kg and less than 5,000 mg/kg (RB15-24).
DRO and ORO Results Compared to Sample-Specific Risk Screening Levels
At present, there are no recognized cleanup goals for petroleum in sediment that are protective of
aquatic receptors. A report prepared for the Massachusetts Department of Environmental
Protection - Office of Research and Standards, titled Sediment Toxicity of Petroleum
Hydrocarbon Fractions (Battelle 2007), proposes an approach for the development of sediment
benchmarks based on the equilibrium partitioning theory. This theory, "states that the toxicity of
hydrocarbons in sediments to benthic organisms is caused by the hydrocarbons that partition
from the organic fraction of sediment particles into pore water and from pore water into the
tissues of sediment-dwelling organisms" (Battelle 2007). Equilibrium partitioning sediment
benchmarks were derived for fractions (classes or groupings of compounds with similar chemical
and toxicological properties) using the final chronic aquatic toxicity value (derived in Battelle
2007 based on a logarithmic relationship between existing toxicological data and known values
of the octanol-water partition coefficient), the sediment organic carbon/water partition
coefficient, and the fraction of organic carbon in sediment.
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 3-14
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2016
There are uncertainties in using the equilibrium partitioning theory to develop sediment
benchmarks for petroleum, such as the wide range of aromatic hydrocarbon toxicity data for both
marine and freshwater species, as well as various test durations. Additionally, the aqueous
solubility of hydrocarbons used in the DRO and ORO fractions are below the estimated acute
toxicity values; the benchmarks are conservative. Where the benchmarks are exceeded, it is
"difficult to distinguish between toxicological effects and potential physical impacts," and
further site evaluation is necessary (Battelle 2007).
Sediment benchmarks were derived using the following equation:
Sediment Benchmark (mg/kg) = Koc x FCV x foc (0.001)
Where:
Koc = sediment organic carbon/water partition coefficient
FCV = final chronic value
foc = fraction of organic carbon in sediment. An foc of 0.1 percent (0.001) was used to give the most
conservative estimated benchmark.
The sediment benchmarks presented in the following table were used to evaluate DRO and ORO
results in the Riverbend Area:
Hydrocarbon
Fraction
Geometric
Mean Log
Kow
Koc
Final
Chronic
Value
(Hg/L)
Sediment Benchmark
(mg/kg oc)
C13 - Ci8 (DRO)
8.57
1.10 x 10s
0.05a
5543
C19 - C36 (ORO)
11.64
8.32 x 101U
o.ooor
9883
Source: Table 6, Sediment Toxicity of Petroleum Hydrocarbon Fractions (Battelle 2007)
Notes:
Kow: octanol-water partition coefficient
Koc: sediment organic carbon/water partition coefficient
foc: fraction of organic carbon in sediment
The fraction is not likely toxic because the mean LC50 (lethal concentration required to cause mortality
to 50 percent of test organisms) exceeds mean aqueous solubility.
Results from the site were provided as DRO C10-C20 and ORO C20-C36. Consequently, for the
purposes of the comparison of site results with sample-specific risk screening values, DRO C13-
Ci8 and ORO C19-C36 were used, respectively.
The following equation was used to determine the sample-specific risk screening levels
(SSRSLs):
SSRSL = Sediment Benchmark (mg/kg) x Fraction of Organic Carbon in Sediment (foc)
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
Page 3-15
June 2016
This example calculation uses the DRO (C10-C20) results of surface sample RB15-01:
RB15-01-SURF SSRSL = 5543 mg/kg (sediment benchmark) x 0.0392 (foc for RBI5-01-SURF)
= 217.3 mg/kg
Table 3-8 and Figures 3-14A and 3-14B (DRO) and 3-15A and 3-15B (ORO) present the
comparison of results to the calculated DRO and ORO SSRSLs.
Area A
The majority of locations in Area A did not have DRO concentrations exceeding the respective
SSRSL. Three locations in Area A (RBI5-02, -08, and -11) had DRO concentrations equal to or
exceeding the SSRSL. Of these three locations, two (RBI 5-02 and -11) had DRO concentrations
exceeding three times their respective SSRSL. The majority of locations in Area A had ORO
concentrations exceeding the respective SSRSL. Five locations had ORO concentrations
exceeding three times their SSRSL (RB15-01, -02, -04, -08, and -11); an additional five locations
had ORO concentrations exceeding twice their SSRSL (RB15-03, -07, -09, -14, and -15); and
two locations had ORO concentrations that exceeded the SSRSL but were less than twice the
SSRSL (RBI5-06 and -13) (Figures 3-14A and 3-15A).
Area B
The majority of locations in Area B did not have DRO concentrations exceeding the SSRSL.
Four locations in Area B had concentrations of DRO in the surface grab that exceeded the
respective SSRSL (RB15-18, -19, -20, and -21). Of these four locations, one had an ORO
concentration that exceeded three times the SSRSL (RB15-20). The majority of locations in
Area B had ORO concentrations exceeding the respective SSRSL, including two locations with
ORO concentrations exceeding three times the respective SSRSL (RB15-20 and -21); an
additional four locations with ORO concentrations exceeding twice the respective SSRSL
(RBI5-19, -23, -24, and -28); and three locations with ORO concentrations that exceeded their
respective SSRSL but were less than twice the SSRSL (RB15-18, -26, and -27) (Figures 3-14B
and 3-15B).
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 4-1
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2016
4. EQUILIBRIUM PARTITIONING SEDIMENT BENCHMARKS
PAH ESBTUs were calculated as an additional tool for evaluating potential risk associated with
sediment contamination. ESBTUs are used to estimate whether there is potential ecological risk
associated with exposure to pore water that is in equilibrium with a measured concentration of
the contaminant in the sediment. Thus, ESBTUs are calculated using an assumed relationship
for partitioning between sediment and water.
4.1 POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS
ESBTUs for total 34 PAHs were calculated following the methods outlined in Procedures for the
Derivation of Equilibrium Partitioning Sediment Benchmarks (ESBs) for the Protection of
Benthic Organisms: PAH Mixtures (EPA 2003a). Based on this guidance, individual PAH
concentrations in sediment were first divided by the fraction of organic carbon measured in the
sediment sample, resulting in an organic carbon-based PAH concentration, or normalized
concentration. This value was then compared to the maximum solubility of that PAH in
sediment on an organic carbon basis. If the organic carbon normalized PAH concentration was
greater than the maximum solubility concentration, then the maximum solubility concentration
was used to calculate the PAH ESBTU instead of the normalized concentration. If the organic
carbon normalized PAH concentration was less than the maximum solubility, the normalized
concentration was used. This value was then divided by the individual PAH's effective
concentration in sediment, defined as the product of its final chronic value and organic carbon-
water partition coefficient (Koc), resulting in an ESB for each individual PAH. The PAH ESBTU
for a sediment sample is the sum of the 34 individual PAHs' ESBTUs (Table 4-1).
Typically, a PAH ESBTU less than or equal to 1 indicates that benthic organisms are not
expected to be harmed by contamination present in the sediments (EPA 2003a). To better
evaluate the results, the following PAH ESBTUs ranges were used: ESBTUs less than 1,
between 1 and 7.5, between 7.5 and 10, and equal to or greater than 10. The samples with PAH
ESBTUs greater than 1 may be toxic to aquatic life. Of the 103 sediment samples that were
analyzed, 27 had a PAH ESBTU less than 1, and 25 samples had a PAH ESBTU equal to or
greater than 10 (Table 4-1). Results from the PAH ESBTU calculations are presented in Figures
4-1A and 4-1B.
In Area A, 16 of the 17 locations that were sampled had a PAH ESBTU greater than 1 in at least
one depth interval from the core or in the surface grab sample, with the one exception being
RB15-10. In the surface grab samples from Area A, PAH ESBTUs were below 1 at five
locations (RB15-01, -03, -10, -15, and -17); between 1 and 7.5 at eight locations (RB15-02, -05,
-06, -07, -08, -09, -14, and -16); between 7.5 and 10 at one location (RB15-13); and greater than
10 at two locations (RB15-04 and -11). In the core samples, PAH ESBTUs greater than 1
occurred in at least one depth interval at 14 of the 17 locations, with the three exceptions being
RBI5-06, -07, and -10. A PAH ESBTU greater than 10 occurred in at least one depth interval
from cores at 11 locations (RB15-02, -03, -04, -05, -09, -11, -12, -13, -14, -15, and -16). PAH
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
Page 4-2
June 2016
ESBTUs were greater than 1 in all of the depth intervals that were analyzed from cores at 10
locations (RB15-01, -02, -03, -08, -09, -12, -13, -14, -15, and -16).
In Area B, 9 of the 11 locations that were sampled had a PAH ESBTU greater than 1 in at least
one depth interval from the core or in the surface grab sample, with the two exceptions being
RBI5-25 and -26. In the surface grab samples from Area B, PAH ESBTUs were below 1 in five
locations (RB15-22, -23, -24, -25, and -26); between 1 and 7.5 at five locations (RB15-18, -19,
-20, -21, and -28); and greater than 10 at one location (RBI5-27). In the core samples, PAH
ESBTUs greater than 1 occurred in at least one depth interval at 9 of the 11 locations, with the
two exceptions being RBI5-25 and -26. A PAH ESBTU greater than 10 occurred in at least one
depth interval at two locations (RBI5-24 and -27), while two additional locations had PAH
ESBTUs that were greater than 7.5 in one depth interval each (RBI5-22 and -23). PAH ESBTUs
were greater than 1 in all of the depth intervals that were analyzed from cores at six locations
(RBI5-18, -20, -21, -22, -23, and -27).
4.2 METALS
Metal toxicity is evaluated through an indirect estimate of bioavailability based on the
concentrations of AVS and SEM, as well as TOC in the sediments. Metal ESBTUs were
calculated following the methods outlined in Procedures for the Derivation o/ESBs for the
Protection ofBenthic Organisms: Metal Mixtures (Cadmium, Copper, Lead, Nickel, Silver, and
Zinc) (EPA 2005). The molar concentration of AVS was subtracted from the molar
concentration of the sum of the SEM measured in each sediment sample, and the result was
divided by the fraction of organic carbon, accounting for preferential sorption of metals to
organic carbon. It should be noted that if the particular sample has excess AVS such that all
SEM is accounted for, this value can be negative.
As presented in the EPA 2005 guidance, when metals ESBTUs are calculated using this method,
a value less than 130 micromoles (|imol) of residual SEM per gram organic carbon (goc)
indicates that the sediment poses a low risk of adverse biological effects associated with metals.
Values between 130 and 3,000 |iinol/g(lc may have adverse effects, and values over 3,000
|imol/goc are expected to be associated with adverse effects.
ESBTU results for metals exceeded 130 |amol/goc in the surface grab samples from RB15-04 in
Area A and RB15-19 in Area B. The ESBTU for metals also exceeded 130 |imol/gocin the FD
collected from the surface grab sample at RBI5-02 in Area B (although FDs are not included on
figures elsewhere in this report, RB15-02-SURFFD is indicated on Figure 4-2A for reference).
All of the metals ESBTU results were below 3,000 |iinol/g(lc (Table 4-2, and Figures 4-2A and
4-2B).
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
Page 5-1
June 2016
5. PROBABLE EFFECTS CONCENTRATION QUOTIENTS
As described in the Prediction of Sediment Toxicity Using Census-based Freshwater Sediment
Quality Guidelines (EPA 2000) guidance, PEC-Qs combine data from multiple constituents in
sediments into one unitless index, and thus can be used in comparing the quality of sediments
from different locations and at different times. As discussed in Ingersoll et.al. (2001), PEC-Qs
are used to evaluate the combined effects of chemical mixtures on the toxicity of sediments to
benthic organisms. They use consensus-based freshwater sediment quality guidelines to
calculate concentration quotients (or hazard quotients) defined as measured sediment
concentrations divided by the specific sediment quality guideline for that particular chemical or
metal. The principle of PEC-Qs is to calculate the geometric mean of all quotients for that
particular sediment sample including those for metals, PAHs, and PCBs.
When the geometric mean PEC-Q is regressed with the percent of toxicity found in that sample
(typically growth or mortality), as shown in Ingersoll et.al. (2001), and the geometric mean of
the PEC-Qs is approximately 1, between 30 percent and 50 percent of the organisms showed a
toxic effect. This could be termed the Effect Concentration for 30 percent (EC30) or 50 percent
(EC50) respectively. This means that between 70 percent and 50 percent of the organisms should
not show an effect when the PEC-Q is 1. Examination of the proportion of toxicity when the
PEC-Q is 0.5 shows that between 6 percent and 35 percent of the organisms showed a toxic
effect, again meaning that between 94 percent and 65 percent of the organisms did not show a
toxic effect when the PEC-Q was 0.5. The important aspects related to the use of PEC-Qs are:
1. The toxic endpoint is not necessarily lethality, but often the endpoint is a chronic
endpoint such as growth.
2. The use of a PEC-Q of 1 does not imply that 100 percent of organisms exposed to those
concentrations will show an effect (chronic or acute), rather that 30 - 50 percent of those
organisms will show the effects, and the rest will not be impacted.
3. The proportion of organisms which show an effect drops to 6 - 35 percent when the PEC-
Q of 0.5 is used.
Consensus-based PECs were used to predict the potential for toxicity in sediments collected from
the Riverbend Area. Mean PEC-Qs were calculated using the procedure that was established by
EPA (2000) to determine the concentration of constituents above which adverse effects are likely
to be observed to sediment-dwelling organisms. A PEC-Q was first determined for each of
seven metals (arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, nickel, and zinc) based on the
available PEC.
PEC — Q metals
metal concentration (in dry weight)
corresponding PEC value
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 5-2
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2016
Then, an average PEC-Q for metals was calculated by summing the PEC-Qs of each metal and
dividing by the number of metals that were included in the calculation (EPA 2000).
£ individual metal PEC — Qs
mean PEC — Q metals =
n
where n = number of metals in the calculation with available sediment chemistry data and PECs.
PEC-Qs were also calculated for total 17 PAHs using a value equal to half the RL for non-
detects (ND=1/2RL), and total PCBs using a value of zero for the non-detects (ND=0). Nine of
the 17 PAHs have PEC values and were used in the PEC-Q calculation: anthracene;
benzo(a)anthracene; benzo(a)pyrene; chrysene; dibenzo(a,h)anthracene; fluoranthene; fluorene;
naphthalene; phenanthrene; and pyrene.
1
total PAH concentraton (ND = ^RU)(in dry weight)
PEC — Q total PAHs =
PEC — Q total PCBs =
corresponding PEC value
total PCB concentraton (ND = 0)(in dry weight)
corresponding PEC value
A mean PEC-Q was calculated by summing the average PEC-Q for metals, the PEC-Q for
PAHs, and the PEC-Q for PCBs.
mean PEC — Q metals + PEC — Q total PAHs + PEC — Q total PCBs
mean PEC - Q =
n
where n = number of sediment classes of chemicals for which sediment chemistry data are
available.
The mean PEC-Q was determined for each sediment sample to provide an overall measure of
chemical contamination and to support an evaluation of the combined potential effects of
multiple constituents in the sediment collected from the site (EPA 2000).
The mean PEC-Q values for each sample collected are summarized in Table 5-1. The mean
PEC-Qs ranged from 0.02 in the surface sample at location RB15-25 to 2,665.16 in the 1-3 ft
interval at location RB15-12 (Table 5-1, Figure 5-1A and Figure 5-1B). The mean PEC-Q for
each sediment sample was compared to benchmarks of 0.5, 1, and 5.
In the surface grab samples from Area A, mean PEC-Qs were calculated to be: below 0.5 at five
locations (RB15-01, 03, -05, -10, and -17); between 0.5 and 1.0 at five locations (RB15-06, -07,
-08, -15 and -16); between 1 and 5 at five locations (RB15-02, -04, -09, -13, and -14); and
greater than 5 at one location (RB15-11). In the core samples from Area A, 12 of the 17
locations had a mean PEC-Q greater than 1 in at least one depth interval (RB15-01, -02, -03, -04,
-05, -09, -11, 12, -13, -14, -15, and-16).
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 5-3
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2016
The mean PEC-Q values in the surface grab samples from Area B were calculated to be: less
than 0.5 at five locations (RB15-21, -23, -24, -25, and -26); between 0.5 and 1 at one location
(RB15-22); between 1 and 5 at four locations (RB15-18, -19, -20, and -28); and greater than 5 at
one location (RBI5-27). In the core samples from Area B, mean PEC-Qs greater than 1 were
calculated for at least one depth interval at 8 of the 11 locations (RB15-19, -20, -21, -22, -23,
-24, -27, and -28).
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 6-1
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2016
6. SPATIAL ANALYSIS TO DETERMINE HOT SPOTS WITHIN THE RIVERBEND
AREA
To determine the location of hot spots within the Riverbend Area of the Detroit River AOC,
three datasets were spatially interpolated to develop an estimate of the level and distribution of
elevated concentrations of constituents across the study area: 1) all individual constituents
(Section 3.2.3) with concentrations exceeding their respective PEC in sediment samples; 2) the
calculated PAH ESBTUs (Section 4.1.1); and 3) the calculated PEC-Qs (Chapter 5). Hot spot
determination allows for prioritizing areas to be targeted for further investigation or remediation.
Interpolation was performed by using a spatially explicit statistical method called kriging, as
described in Section 6.1. Section 6.2 describes the kriging analysis results for concentrations of
all constituents, Section 6.3 describes the kriging analysis results for PAH ESBTUs, and Section
6.4 describes the kriging analysis results for PEC-Qs. Section 6.5 describes the priority
assessment of hot spots based on all constituents.
6.1 METHODOLOGY
A three-dimensional model of each analyte measured in the sediment samples was constructed
using the statistical interpolation method of kriging with C-Tech's Mining Visualization System
Version 9.89.
Input included each analyte's concentration at every location, and the results were combined to
identify all areas with one or more detections above the respective PEC levels, two times above
the PEC levels, and three times above the PEC levels. To further define the hot spot areas
identified from modeling all constituents, additional inputs included the calculated PAH
ESBTUs and PEC-Qs; these were modeled separately to identify areas with PAH ESBTUs of
between 1 and 7.5, between 7.5 and 10, and equal to or greater than 10, and to identify areas with
PEC-Qs between 0.5 and 1 and equal to or greater than 1. Although ESBTUs were also
calculated for metals, this data was not included in the model inputs for the spatial analysis
because only three results (one of which was an FD) exceeded the thresholds discussed in
Section 4.2, and these results occurred within the hot spots identified in Section 6.2.
6.2 MODEL RESULTS FOR ALL CONSTITUENTS IN THE RIVERBEND AREA
Concentrations of all individual constituents were input to the model, and the kriging analysis
identified areas with PEC exceedances of total PCBs, total 17 PAHs, and/or each of the 10
metals that have PECs. Four hot spots were identified within the study area where one or more
analytes were present in concentrations exceeding the PEC.
Figure 6-1A presents the results for all constituents exceeding their respective PECs in Area A,
and Figure 6-1B presents the results for all constituents exceeding their respective PECs in
Area B. These figures present the estimated volume of sediment with elevated concentrations of
constituents exceeding their respective PECs for each hot spot along with the predominant
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 6-2
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2016
constituent contributing to the elevated concentrations. The volume estimates do not include
contingency or overburden; however, they are subject to the uncertainties of the study design and
modeling limitations. Figures 6-2 through 6-5 provide additional detail on each hot spot,
including sample locations and the maximum concentration of each constituent greater than the
respective PEC. Hot Spots 1 and 2 are separated by two sample locations that did not have PEC
exceedances (RBI5-08 and -10); Hot Spots 2 and 3 are separated by one location that did not
have a PEC exceedance (RBI5-17); and Hot Spots 3 and 4 are separated around two locations
that did not have PEC exceedances (RBI5-25 and -26).
• Hot Spot 1: Hot Spot 1 is in Area A and contains sample locations RB15-01, -02, -03,
-04, -05, -06, -07, and -09. It includes the areas adjacent to Joe Louis Arena and West
Riverfront Park (Figures 6-1A and 6-2). The estimated volume of sediment with
constituent concentrations exceeding the PEC is approximately 461,000 cubic yards (cy)
(Figures 6-1A and 6-2). Constituents for which PEC exceedances occurred within Hot
Spot 1 include total 17 PAHs, total PCBs, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury,
nickel, silver, and zinc. The predominant constituent contributing to elevated
concentrations above the PEC is total 17 PAHs; which exceeded three times the PEC at
RB15-02, -03, -04, -05, and -09 (Figures 6-1A and 6-2). The maximum concentrations of
total PCBs (RB15-01), cadmium (RB15-03), nickel (RB15-04) and silver (RB15-04)
identified in the Riverbend Area occurred within Hot Spot 1.
• Hot Spot 2: Hot Spot 2 is in Area A and contains sample locations RB15-11, -12, -13,
-14, -15, and -16. It includes the areas adjacent to the Ambassador Bridge and Riverside
Park (Figures 6-1A and 6-3). The estimated volume of sediment with constituent
concentrations exceeding the PEC is approximately 42,000 cy (Figures 6-1A and 6-3).
Constituents for which PEC exceedances occurred within Hot Spot 2 include total 17
PAHs, total PCBs, chromium, copper, iron, lead, mercury, silver, and zinc. The
predominant constituent contributing to elevated concentrations above the PEC is total 17
PAHs; which exceeded three times the PEC at RB15-11, -12, -13, -14, -15, and -16
(Figure 6-3). The maximum concentrations of total PAHs (RBI 5-12) and iron
(RBI5-14) identified in the Riverbend Area occurred within Hot Spot 2.
• Hot Spot 3: Hot Spot 3 is in Area B and contains sample locations RB15-18, -19, -20,
-21, -22, -23, and -24. It includes the areas adjacent to the Detroit Terminal of the
Nicholson Terminal & Dock Company and Historic Fort Wayne (Figures 6-1B and 6-4).
The estimated volume of sediment with constituent concentrations exceeding the PEC is
approximately 163,000 cy (Figures 6-1B and 6-4). Constituents for which PEC
exceedances occurred within Hot Spot 3 include total 17 PAHs, total PCBs, arsenic,
cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury, nickel, silver, and zinc. The predominant
constituent contributing to elevated concentrations above the PEC is copper; which was
three times the PEC at RB15-18, -21, -22, -23, and -24 (Figure 6-4). The maximum
concentrations of arsenic (RBI 5-24), chromium (RBI 5-20), copper (RBI 5-20), mercury
(RB15-19), and zinc (RB15-20) identified in the Riverbend Area occurred within Hot
Spot 3.
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 6-3
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2016
• Hot Spot 4: Hot Spot 4 is in Area B and contains sample locations RBI5-27 and-28. It
is located near the outfall of the Rouge River Old Channel and includes the areas adjacent
to the Detroit-Windsor Truck Ferry loading dock and Zug Island (Figures 6-1B and 6-5).
The estimated volume of sediment with constituent concentrations exceeding the PEC is
approximately 83,000 cy (Figures 6-1B and 6-5). Constituents for which PEC
exceedances occurred within Hot Spot 4 include total 17 PAHs, cadmium, chromium,
copper, lead, mercury, nickel, silver, and zinc. The predominant constituent contributing
to elevated concentrations above the PEC is total 17 PAHs; which exceeded three times
the PEC at RBI 5-27 (Figure 6-5). The maximum concentration of lead (RBI 5-28)
identified in the Riverbend Area occurred within Hot Spot 4.
6.3 MODEL RESULTS FOR PAH EQUILIBRIUM PARTITIONING SEDIMENT
BENCHMARK TOXIC UNITS FOR THE RIVERBEND AREA
A kriging analysis was performed to identify areas with PAH ESBTUs equal to or greater than 1
within some of the hot spot areas that were identified when all constituents were kriged (Section
6.2). Figure 6-6A presents the results for PAH ESBTUs exceeding 1 overlain with the identified
hot spots in Area A. Figure 6-6B presents the results for PAH ESBTUs exceeding 1 overlain
with the identified hot spots in Area B.
6.3.1 Spatial Analysis for PAH ESBTUs in Area A
The spatial analysis for PAH ESBTUs in Area A identified two areas and 16 sample locations
where sediment samples had PAH ESBTUs greater than 1. Figure 6-6A presents the areas
identified along with the maximum PAH ESBTU at each sample location, as well as the overlap
of the spatial analysis for PAH ESBTUs in Area A and identified hot spots.
The areas with elevated PAH ESBTUs in Area A are primarily in the same locations as Hot
Spots 1 and 2 that were identified in Section 6.2 (Figures 6-1A and 6-6A). The two exceptions
to this are: sample location RBI 5-08 falls just outside of Hot Spot 1 but has a maximum PAH
ESBTU of 2.49, and sample location RB15-17 is downstream of Hot Spot 2 but has a maximum
PAH ESBTU of 3.57 (Figure 6-6 A). Within the area of Hot Spot 1, maximum PAH ESBTUs
were calculated to be: between 1 and 7.5 at sample locations RBI5-01, -06, -07, and -08; and
greater than 10 at sample locations RB15-02, -03, -04, -05, and -09 (Figure 6-6A). The
maximum PAH ESBTUs calculated at sample locations within Hot Spot 2 were all greater than
10 (Figure 6-6A). The highest PAH ESBTU in Area A (202.8) was calculated for the 0-1 ft
interval at location RB15-12 in Hot Spot 2.
6.3.2 Spatial Analysis for PAH ESBTUs in Area B
The spatial analysis for PAH ESBTUs in Area B identified two areas, nine sample locations,
where sediment samples had PAH ESBTUs greater than 1. Figure 6-6B presents the areas
identified along with the maximum PAH ESBTU at each sample location, as well as the overlap
of the spatial analysis for PAH ESBTUs in Area B and identified hot spots.
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 6-4
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2016
Both of the areas with elevated PAH ESBTUs in Area B are in the same locations as the
identified hot spots in Area B (Figures 6-1B and 6-6B). Within the area of Hot Spot 3,
maximum PAH ESBTUs were calculated to be: between 1 and 7.5 at sample locations RB15-18,
-19, -20, and -21; between 7.5 and 10 at sample locations RB15-22 and -23; and greater than 10
at sample location RBI 5-24 (Figure 6-6B). Within the area of Hot Spot 4, the maximum PAH
ESBTUs were calculated to be between 1 and 7.5 at RBI5-28 and greater than 10 at RBI5-27
(Figure 6-6B). The highest PAH ESBTU in Area B (123.6) was calculated for the surface grab
sample at location RBI5-27 within Hot Spot 4.
6.4 MODEL RESULTS FOR PROBABLE EFFECTS CONCENTRATION
QUOTIENTS FOR THE RIVERBEND AREA
In addition to all constituent concentrations and PAH ESBTUs, PEC-Qs were also modeled. The
kriging analysis identified areas with PEC-Qs equal to or greater than 0.5 within some of the hot
spot areas that were identified when all constituents were kriged (Section 6.2). Figure 6-7A
presents the results for PEC-Qs exceeding 0.5 overlain with the identified hot spots in Area A;
Figure 6-7B presents the results for PEC-Qs exceeding 0.5 overlain with the identified hot spots
in Area B.
6.4.1 Spatial Analysis for PEC-Qs in Area A
The spatial analysis for PEC-Qs in Area A identified three areas, 15 sample locations, where
sediment samples had PEC-Qs greater than 0.5. Figure 6-7A presents the areas identified in
Area A and the maximum PEC-Q value at each sample location, as well as the overlap of the
spatial analysis for PEC-Qs in Area A and identified hot spots.
Most of the areas with elevated PEC-Qs in Area A were in the same location as Hot Spots 1 and
2 (Figure 6-7A). The only exceptions were that there is a gap within Hot Spot 1 where the
predicted PEC-Q values are below 0.5 and that sample location RBI5-08, which falls just outside
of Hot Spot 1, had a maximum calculated PEC-Q of between 0.5 and 1 in the surface grab
sample. Within the area of Hot Spot 1, the maximum PEC-Qs were calculated to be: between
0.5 and 1 at sample locations RB15-06 and -07; between 1 and 5 at sample locations RB15-03,
-05, and -09; and greater than 5 at sample locations RBI5-01, -02, and -04 (Figure 6-7A). The
maximum PEC-Qs calculated for sample locations within Hot Spot 2 were all greater than 5
(Figure 6-7A). The highest PEC-Q in Area A (2,665) was calculated for the 1-3 ft interval at
location RB15-12 within the area of Hot Spot 2.
6.4.2 Spatial Analysis for PEC-Qs in Area B
The spatial analysis for PEC-Qs in Area B identified two areas, nine sample locations, where
sediment samples had PEC-Qs greater than 0.5. Figure 6-7B presents the areas identified in
Area B and the maximum PEC-Q value at each sample location, as well as the overlap of the
spatial analysis for PEC-Qs in Area B and the hot spots identified in Section 6.2.
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 6-5
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2016
The areas with elevated PEC-Qs in Area B overlapped with Hot Spots 3 and 4 (Figure 6-7B).
Within the area of Hot Spot 3, the maximum PEC-Qs were calculated to be: between 1 and 5 at
sample locations RB15-18, -19, and -21; and greater than 5 at sample locations RB15-20, -22,
-23, and -24 (Figure 6-7B). Within the area of Hot Spot 4, the maximum PEC-Qs were
calculated to be between 1 and 5 at sampling location RBI5-28 and greater than 5 at sampling
location RBI5-27 (Figure 6-7B). The highest PEC-Q in Area B (29.0) was calculated in the
5-6.5 ft depth interval at location RBI 5-27 within the area of Hot Spot 4.
6.5 DETERMINATION OF PREDOMINANT HOT SPOTS BASED ON ALL
CONSTITUENTS IN THE RIVERBEND AREA
The hot spot areas identified in Section 6.2 can be prioritized for further investigation and
potential remediation efforts when considered with the results of the spatial analyses of PAH
ESBTUs and PEC-Qs. Hot spots are further categorized as Level 1, Level 2, or Level 3 based
on the following criteria:
Level 1 - highest impact
Contaminant results are > 3 x PEC OR
• PEC-Q > 5, OR
• ESBTU >7.5.
Level 2
Contaminant results are > 3 x PEC OR
• PEC-Q >1, OR
• ESBTU >7.5.
Level 3 - lowest impact
Contaminant results are > 3 x PEC OR
• PEC-Q >0.5, OR
• ESBTU >1.
This categorization is based on the presence of elevated levels of contaminants and is not a
comparative evaluation of the impact of different classes of contaminants. Level 1 hot spot areas
have the largest estimated volumes of sediment with COCs exceeding the PEC. Level 3 hot spot
areas have less elevated contaminant concentrations and, in some cases, smaller estimated
sediment volumes exceeding the PEC. This section presents additional details on each of the
four hot spot areas, presented within their respective levels.
6.5.1 Level 1 Hot Spots
To be considered Level 1, hot spots must have at least one of the following three conditions: a
contaminant result that is equal to or greater than three times the respective PEC, a PEC-Q value
equal to or greater than 5, or an ESBTU equal to or greater than 7.5. Hot Spots 1, 2, 3, and 4 all
meet the Level 1 criteria.
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 6-6
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2016
6.5.1.1 Hot Spot 1
Hot Spot 1 includes sample locations RB15-01, -02, -03, -4, -05, -06, -07, and -09 (Figure 6-2).
The COCs for this hot spot area are total PCBs, total 17 PAHs, and eight metals (cadmium,
chromium, copper, lead, mercury, nickel, silver, and zinc). The model estimates that 80 percent
of the hot spot area has constituent concentrations exceeding three times the PEC.
Total PCBs concentrations exceeded the PEC at five of the eight sample locations in Hot Spot 1.
Concentrations of total PCBs exceeded three times the PEC at sample locations RBI 5-01 and -02
(Figure 6-2). Of the intervals analyzed, total PCBs concentrations above the PEC in Hot Spot 1
were present to a maximum depth interval of 3-5 ft (RB15-01). Total 17 PAHs concentrations
exceeded the PEC at all eight sample locations in Hot Spot 1. Total 17 PAHs concentrations
exceeded three times the PEC at locations RBI 5-02, -03, -04, -05, and -09. Of the intervals
analyzed, total 17 PAHs concentrations above the PEC in Hot Spot 1 were present to a maximum
depth interval of 3-5 ft (RB15-01 and -03).
No metals exceeded the PEC at RBI5-09. Concentrations of eight metals at RBI5-01 and -03;
seven metals at RBI5-02 and -04; and one metal at RBI5-05, -06 and -07 exceeded the PEC. Of
the intervals analyzed, metals concentrations above the PEC in Hot Spot 1 were present to a
maximum depth interval of 3-5 ft (RB15-01 and -03). The highest concentrations of nickel and
silver in the Riverbend Area were detected at RBI 5-04, the highest concentration of total PCBs
in the Riverbend Area was detected at RBI5-01, and the highest concentration of cadmium in the
Riverbend Area was detected at RBI5-03.
Sample locations RBI5-01, -06 and -07 had maximum PAH ESBTUs greater than 1 and less
than 7.5. Sample locations RB15-02, -03, -04, -05, and -09 had maximum PAH ESBTUs greater
than 10. Sample locations RB15-03, -05, and -09 had maximum PEC-Qs greater than 1 and less
than 5 (4.75, 2.41, and 1.74, respectively). Sample locations RB15-01, -02, and -04 had
maximum PEC-Qs greater than 5 (5.97, 12.58, and 6.24, respectively). In addition, sample
location RB14-04 had a metals ESBTU greater than 130 |imol/g„c, which indicates the location
may have adverse biological effects associated with metals.
6.5.1.2 Hot Spot 2
Hot Spot 2 includes sample locations RB15-11, -12, -13, -14, -15, and -16 (Figure 6-3). The
COCs for this hot spot area are total PCBs, total 17 PAHs, and eight metals (chromium, copper,
iron, lead, mercury, nickel, silver, and zinc). The model estimates that most of the hot spot area
has constituent concentrations exceeding three times the PEC.
Concentrations of total 17 PAHs exceeded three times the PEC at all six locations in Hot Spot 2.
Maximum concentrations of total PCBs exceeded the PEC at locations RB15-12 and -14, and the
maximum concentration of total PCBs exceeded three times the PEC at RB15-13. Of the
intervals analyzed, total 17 PAHs and total PCBs concentrations above the PEC in Hot Spot 2
were present to a maximum depth interval of 4-6 ft (RBI5-16) and 2.5-3.5 ft (RBI5-13),
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 6-7
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2016
respectively. The highest concentration of total 17 PAHs in the Riverbend Area was detected at
location RB15-12.
Concentrations of five metals at RB15-12 and -14, four metals at RB15-15 and -16, three metals
at RB15-13, and one metal at RB15-11 exceeded the PEC. The highest concentration of iron in
the Riverbend Area was detected at RBI 5-14. Of the intervals analyzed, metals concentrations
above the PEC in Hot Spot 2 were present to a maximum depth interval of either 2-4 ft or 3-4 ft
(detected at locations RBI5-15 and -16, respectively).
All six of the sample locations in Hot Spot 2 had maximum PAH ESBTUs that were greater than
10. All six of the sample locations in Hot Spot 2 had maximum PEC-Qs greater than 5: 13.05 at
RB15-11, 2,665.16 atRB15-12, 18.97 atRB15-13, 19.70 atRB15-14, 17.34 atRB15-15, and
46.60 at RB15-16.
6.5.1.3 Hot Spot 3
Hot Spot 3 includes sample locations RB15-18, -19, -20, -21, -22, -23, and -24 (Figure 6-4). The
COCs for this hot spot area are total 17 PAHs, total PCBs, and nine metals (arsenic, cadmium,
chromium, copper, lead, mercury, nickel, silver, and zinc. The model estimates that most of the
hot spot area has constituent concentrations exceeding three times the PEC.
Maximum concentrations of total 17 PAHs exceeded three times the PEC at five of the locations
in Hot Spot 2, and exceeded twice the PEC at the other two locations. Maximum concentrations
of total PCBs exceeded the PEC at locations RB15-19, -22, and -24. Of the intervals analyzed,
total 17 PAHs and total PCBs concentrations above the PEC in Hot Spot 2 were present to a
maximum depth interval of 5-6 ft (RB15-24) and 0-1 ft (RB15-19, 22 and 24), respectively.
Concentrations of eight metals at RBI5-20, -22, and -23; nine metals at RBI5-24, five metals at
RB15-21; four metals at RB15-19; and two metals at RB15-18 exceeded the PEC. The highest
concentration of arsenic in the Riverbend Area was detected at RBI5-24. The highest
concentrations of chromium, copper, and zinc in the Riverbend Area were detected at RBI5-20.
The highest concentration of mercury in the Riverbend Area was detected at RB15-19. Of the
intervals analyzed, metals concentrations above the PEC in Hot Spot 2 were present to a
maximum depth interval of either 4-5 ft or 3-5 ft (detected at locations RBI 5-24 or RBI 5-22 and
-23, respectively).
Sample locations RBI5-18, -19, -20, and -21 had maximum PAH ESBTUs greater than 1 and
less than 7.5. Sample locations RBI5-22 and -23 had maximum PAH ESBTUs between 7.5 and
10. Sample location RBI5-24 had a maximum PAH ESBTU greater than 10. Sample locations
RB15-18, -19, and -21 had maximum PEC-Qs greater than 1 and less than 5 (1.57, 2.31, and
1.48, respectively). Sample locations RBI5-20, 22, -23, and -24 had maximum PEC-Qs greater
than 5 (5.04, 5.14, 6.48, and 7.02, respectively). In addition, sample location RBI4-19 had a
metals ESBTU greater than 130 |iinol/g(lc, which indicates the location may have adverse
biological effects associated with metals.
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 6-8
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2016
6.5.1.4 Hot Spot 4
Hot Spot 4 includes sample locations RBI5-27 and -28 (Figure 6-5). The COCs for this hot spot
area are total 17 PAHs and eight metals (cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury, nickel,
silver, and zinc). The model estimates that most of this hot spot area has constituent
concentrations exceeding three times the PEC.
Concentrations of total 17 PAHs exceeded the twice PEC at both sample locations in Hot Spot 4,
and exceeded three times the PEC at RBI 5-27. Of the intervals analyzed, total 17 PAHs
concentrations above the PEC in Hot Spot 4 were present to a maximum depth interval of
5-6.5 ft (RBI5-27).
Concentrations of eight metals at RBI5-27 and two metals at RBI5-28 exceeded the PEC
(Figure 6-5). The highest concentration of lead in the Riverbend Area was detected at RBI 5-28.
Of the intervals analyzed, metals concentrations above the PEC in Hot Spot 4 were present to a
maximum depth interval of 5-6.5 ft (RBI5-27).
The maximum PAH ESBTUs were between 1 and 7.5 at RB15-28 and greater than 10 at
RBI5-27. The maximum PEC-Qs were between 1 and 5 at RBI5-28 (1.70) and greater than 5 at
RBI5-27 (29.00).
6.5.2 Level 2 and Level 3 Hot Spots
The four hot spots identified based on the results of this investigation were all categorized as
Level 1; no Level 2 or Level 3 hots spots were identified.
6.6 COMPARISON OF RIVERBEND AREA HOT SPOTS WITH ASSESSMENTS
FOR OTHER SECTIONS OF THE DETROIT RIVER AREA OF CONCERN
The Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 criteria in Section 6.5 were also utilized to categorize hot spots
in the Mid/Lower Trenton Channel Assessment of Contaminated Sediments (EA 2015).
Different hot spot rating systems were utilized in the Celeron Island Area Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments (EA 2014a) and the River Rouge/Ecorse Shoreline Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments (EA 2014b). In the Celeron Island Area characterization, hot spots
were categorized as low or high impact. Low impact hot spots were defined as areas having
concentrations of at least one constituent exceeding its respective PEC, while the high impact
designation was applied to hot spots containing concentrations of at least one constituent
exceeding three times its respective PEC (EA 2014a). In the River Rouge/Ecorse Shoreline
characterization, hot spots were categorized as major if the model predicted that a majority of the
area within the hot spot had at least one constituent with a concentration exceeding three times
its respective PEC. Hot spots that did not satisfy the criteria to be labeled as major were
identified as other hot spots (EA 2014b).
As discussed in the previous sections, four hots spots have been identified in the Riverbend Area,
all of which are designated as Level 1. All four of the Riverbend Area hot spots would be
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
Page 6-9
June 2016
identified as high impact hot spots under the criteria utilized in the Celeron Island Area
characterization. The four Riverbend Area hot spots would all be identified as major hot spots
according to the criteria applied in the River Rouge/Ecorse Shoreline characterization.
In the Mid/Lower Trenton Channel, nine hot spots were identified, of which seven were
designated as Level 1, one was designated as Level 2, and one was designated as Level 3 (EA
2015). Seven of the Mid/Lower Trenton Channel hot spots would be identified as high impact
under the criteria utilized in the Celeron Island Area characterization, with the remaining two
being designated as low impact. If the criteria from the River Rouge/Ecorse Shoreline were
applied, four of the Mid/Lower Trenton Channel hot spots would be identified as major hot spots
and the remaining five would be identified as other hot spots.
In the Celeron Island Area characterization, seven hot spots were identified, of which four were
designated as high impact and three were designated as low impact (EA 2014a). If the criteria
described in Section 6.5 were applied to the seven hot spots that were identified in the Celeron
Island Area characterization, four of the hot spots would be identified as Level 1 hot spots and
three would be identified as Level 3 hot spots. If the criteria from the River Rouge/Ecorse
Shoreline characterization were applied, one of the hot spots in the Celeron Island Area would be
identified as a major hot spot and the other six would be considered other hot spots.
Three hot spots were identified in the River Rouge/Ecorse Shoreline characterization, of which
two hot spots were labeled as major and one hot spot was labeled as other (EA 2014b). If the
criteria defined in Section 6.5 were applied to the hot spots identified in the River Rouge/Ecorse
Shoreline characterization, all three of the hot spots would be designated as Level 1. If the
criteria from the Celeron Island Area characterization were applied to the three hot spots
identified in the River Rouge/Ecorse Shoreline characterization, all three would be labeled as
high impact hot spots.
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 7-1
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2016
7. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY SAMPLES
COLLECTED FROM LOCATIONS NEAR RIVERSIDE PARK
MDEQ provided input on the six sample locations near Riverside Park (RBI5-11, -12,-13,-14,
-15, and -16) (Figure 7-1). Mr. John Barkach of Great Lakes Environmental Center, Inc. served
as the MDEQ representative and was onsite as these samples were collected and processed.
During the sample processing, the MDEQ representative selected some of the core sample
intervals from these locations near Riverside Park to perform additional chemical analysis, the
results of which will be used to support a separate MDEQ project. None of the intervals from
the core at RBI5-11 were selected by the MDEQ representative for the additional analysis. The
MDEQ representative collected some of the extra material from the other five locations to submit
for analysis of volatiles, semi-volatiles, total cyanide, Kjeldahl nitrogen, and percent total solids.
The results of these analyses are presented in Tables 7-1A, 7-1B, 7-1C, 7-1D, and 7-1E. These
results are separate and independent from the analysis discussed in the other sections of this
report and are not included in any of the preceding calculations or spatial models.
7.1 RESULTS OF THE MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ANALYSIS OF RIVERSIDE PARK SAMPLES
The MDEQ analysis included 63 semi-volatiles constituents performed on one sample from each
of five locations for a total of five samples, and 72 volatile constituents performed on 15 total
samples from five locations. Concentrations of semi-volatile constituents were compared to
available TEC and PEC values (MacDonald et al. 2000, WDNR 2003). Details of these results
are presented in Tables 7-1A and 7-1B.
A fingerprint analysis following EPA Method 8270 was performed on five of the samples
collected by MDEQ (Table 7-1C).
Total cyanide results ranged from 2.7 mg/kg in the 2-4 ft interval of the core from RBI 5-15, to
1,200 mg/kg collected near the 1.5 ft depth level of RB15-14 (Table 7-1D).
Percent total solids ranged from 58 percent in the 1-2 ft interval of the core from RB15-12, to
81.1 percent near the 4.3 ft depth level ofRB15-13 and the 4.2 ft depth level ofRB15-15 (Table
7-1D).
Kjeldahl nitrogen ranged from 760 mg/kg in the 2-4 ft interval of the core from RB15-15, to
4,300 mg/kg in the 1-2 ft interval of the core from RB15-12 (Table 7-1E).
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
Page 8-1
June 2016
8. CONCLUSIONS
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Based on the data collected during the Riverbend Area sediment characterization, the Level 1
(highest impact) hot spot areas with elevated concentrations of constituents are: Hot Spot 1
(includes the area adjacent to Joe Louis Arena and West Riverfront Park in Area A); Hot Spot 2
(includes the area adjacent to the Ambassador Bridge and Riverside Park in Area A); Hot Spot 3
(includes the area adjacent to the Delray Public Access Boat Ramp and Historic Fort Wayne in
Area B); and Hot Spot 4 (includes the area adjacent to the Detroit-Windsor Truck Ferry and the
mouth of the Rouge River Old Channel near Zug Island in Area B) (Figures 6-2 through 6-5).
These Level 1 high impact hot spots have an estimated total of approximately 749,000 cy of
sediment with constituent concentrations exceeding at least one PEC.
The four hot spots identified in the Riverbend Area were determined to be Level 1 hot spots and
should be considered for further investigation. Model results indicated that each of these areas
has a large volume of sediment with elevated concentrations of constituents exceeding two or
three times the PEC. Modeling of the PAH ESBTUs and the PEC-Qs also showed elevated
values within the hot spot areas. Further delineation of the extent of sediment with elevated
concentrations of constituents is recommended.
The modeling results for all constituents exceeding two or three times the PEC, the PAH
ESBTUs, and the PEC-Qs suggest that the hot spot areas should be considered for further
investigation and potential remediation within the Riverbend Area. However, the limited
number of samples results in significant uncertainty of the volume of sediment with elevated
concentrations of constituents in the hot spot areas.
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Assessment of Contaminated Sediments
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
Page 9-1
June 2016
9. REFERENCES
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Anchor QEA, LLC, and ENVIRON International
Corporation. 2013. Lower Rouge River - Old Channel: Final FS Report. Prepared for
Honeywell International Inc. August.
Battelle. 2007. Sediment Toxicity of Petroleum Hydrocarbon Fractions. Prepared for
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection - Office of Research and
Standards. September.
Detroit Water and Sewerage Department. 2014. Facts. Public Affairs Group, Detroit, MI.
June.
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC and its affiliate EA Science and
Technology (E A). 2014a. Assessment of Contaminated Sediments, Celeron Island Area
Site Characterization Report, Detroit River Area of Concern, Grosse He, Michigan. July.
. 2014b. Assessment of Contaminated Sediments, River Rouge/Ecorse Shoreline Site
Characterization Report, Detroit River Area of Concern, Wayne County, Michigan.
August.
. 2015. Assessment of Contaminated Sediments, Mid/Lower Trenton Channel Area Site
Characterization Report, Detroit River Area of Concern, Grosse He, Michigan. July.
. 2016a. Quality Assurance Project Plan, Assessment of Contaminated Sediment,
Riverbend Area Site Characterization, Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan.
January.
. 2016b. Data Usability Report, Assessment of Contaminated Sediments, Riverbend Area
Site Characterization, Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan. March.
Geiger, S. C. 2010. The Determination of Sediment Poly cyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon (PAH)
Bioavailability using Direct Pore Water Analysis by Solid-Phase Microextraction
(SPME). ESTCP Project ER-200709. Prepared for Environmental Security Technology
Certification Program, U.S. Department of Defense. August.
Ingersoll, C.G., D.D. MacDonald, N. Wang, J.L. Crane, L.J. Field, P.S. Haverland, N.E. Kemble,
R.A. Lindskoog, C. Severn, and D.E. Smorong. 2001. Predictions of sediment toxicity
using consensus-based freshwater sediment quality guidelines. Archives of
Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 41:8-21.
MacDonald D.D., C.G. Ingersoll, T.A. Berger. 2000. Development and evaluation of
consensus-based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems. Archives of
Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 39:20-31.
-------
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Version: FINAL
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC Page 9-2
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology June 2016
MacDonald, D.D. and M. MacFarlane. 1999. (Draft). Criteria for managing contaminated
sediment in British Columbia. British Columbia Ministry of Environment, Lands, and
Parks. Victoria, British Columbia.
Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR). 1991. Detroit River Remedial Action
Plan Stage 1. Surface Water Quality Division, Lansing, Michigan. June.
Persaud, D.R., R. Jaagumagi, and A. Hayton. 1993. Guidelines for the protection and
management of aquatic sediments in Ontario. Standards Development Branch. Ontario
Ministry of Environment and Energy. Toronto, Canada.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2000. Prediction of sediment toxicity using
consensus-based freshwater sediment quality guidelines: EPA 905/R-00/007, Great Lakes
Program Office, Chicago, Illinois.
. 2003 a. Procedures for the Derivation of Equilibrium Partitioning Sediment
Benchmarks (ESBs) for the Protection of Benthic Organisms: PAH Mixtures. EPA-600-
R-02-013. Office of Research and Development. Washington, DC 20460.
. 2003b. EPA Region 5 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Ecological Screening
Levels. August.
. 2005. Procedures for the Derivation of Equilibrium Partitioning Sediment Benchmarks
(ESBs) for the Protection of Benthic Organisms: Metal Mixtures (Cadmium, Copper,
Lead, Nickel, Silver, and Zinc). EPA-600-R-02-011. Office of Research and
Development. Washington, DC 20460. January.
. 2008. Interim Guidance for Developing Global Positioning System Data Collection
Standard Operating Procedures and Quality Assurance Project Plans. EPA/600/R-
08/020.
. 2014a. National Functional Guidelines for Superfund Organic Method Data Review.
EPA-540-R-014-002. Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation.
August.
. 2014b. National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Superfund Data Review. EPA-
540-R-013-001. Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. August.
. 2015. Statement of Work Assessment of Contaminated Sediments for the Riverbend
Area Site Characterization in the Detroit River Area of Concern. June.
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR). 2003. Consensus Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for Use and Application. WT 732-2003.
December.
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
Figures
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
Qffcsib
GS33Q0
VICINITY MAP
CT^TTfrn
GsndiD
aaaaaj
&iito
/Tfflcn
Tm
ftnrfrrtta
it>rs
4PM" ^ :
-w >rM'"'>ȴ- -^' 1 *"5(0
» iQI
'
iflCV *' * V. -
. «T nnar.
Ul&i • v I hmj ¦
EfnSr^liHil
E££SSS3
OuistJSlEDS
GkfaAjQw
&
\\lovetonqis\GISdata\Federal\Midwest\Michiqan\GLAES\Riverbend\MXD\SCR\RB Figure 1-1 Project Site Location.mxd
nmr
Ste Marie
soil
Milwaukee £,Jr"?
Rapids
oLoik
Lansing c
chicag. Map Extent-
Iceland
Legend
Riverbend Area
D Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
©
0 1
Map Date: 4/12/2016
Basemap: ESRI 2014
Miles
FIGURE 1-1
Project Site Location
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
Former MisterskyMhv J
_ Power Plant
y
Former Anaconda
Former Revere,
Brass Outfall
¦¦Formers
Allied Chemical Historic ;
Fort Wayne
ftrea;B«« FWi
Area A
p? ,UE». I J
Joe Louis
Arena
Riverside Park
' if7 HTj ^TT-XJ.
West Riverfront ,
Former MGP
'•
LaFarge
oadinq Dock
Detroit-
KwirTdsoJ
pu^^Ferry
Zug II
Island S
Riverfront
Towers
Nicholson Terminal
& Dock Company
- Detroit Terminal
Detroit River
Delray
Public Access
Boat Ramp
\\lovetonqis\GISdata\Federal\Midwest\Michiqan\GLAES\Riverbend\MXD\SCR\RB Figure 1-2 Riverbend Area.mxd
VICINITY MAP
©
Sterling
Heights
Farming! on
Hills
Southfleld
Nov i
Livonia & \ fl
- -1 -9 6 W \
sXroii
fWindscf
West land
minion Dearborn X Tecumseh
Heights
Taylor
¦.-rnrm^r
1—Map Extent
Essex
Amhen-lburg
Harrow Kings vS
Legend
© Sample Location
• Outfall
cso
T-] Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
0 1,000 2^00 3,000 4,000
Feet
Map Date: 6/1/2016
Basemap: ESRI 2014
FIGURE 1-2
Riverbend Area
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
Foot of Cass CSO
Revere Brass W60
Island
Third St. CSO outfall 026
~
=f
ol
Foot of 2nd St. CSO
Hamilton CSO outfall 025
Eleventh St. CSO outfall 028 -
Rosa Parks CSO outfa 029 —
Vermont CSO outfa 030 —
Eighteenth St. CSO outfall 031 -
Twenty-First St CSO outfall 032
£$!m
Twenty-Fourth St. outfall 033 —
Riverside Park is CSO outfall 034 —
Swain CSO outfall 035 —
Scotten CSO outfall 036 —
—'—"TT "™— 1
McKmstry CSO
I
Scot!
¦ V'
Anacond
Summit-Clark 038 and Ferdinand 039 CSO —i
Junction CSO outfall 41
—— —
Campbell CSO outfall 042
*
- Mistersky W74
- Revere Brass W61
— Revere Brass W59
Schroeaer Ave Sewers W58.5 —
Schroeder CSO outfa
\ss
Ha.
%
S
. V v jMDHk I
Mo re 11 CSO outfall 040
i*b -—nvaKMBwl v> 1
" «' »^r^S®TS(¦ • i .,'irZL :'«*£& '4,«• S^SwJfeSj. ikVrS?
; 'A jhKs
Dragoon Livernois Relief CSO outfall |
,
D outfa
1
Esm-^lESu
kx*$@3lS
X Va®T«^>T'
Allied Chemical Corporation/Schroeder Ave Sewer W58
•— Allied Chemical Corporation/Schroeder Ave Sewer W57
S£
Allied Chemical Corporation W100
Nov
Liv6nia
VICINITY MAP
Farming on
HlM' vomhlieid
Sterling
Heights
Wetland _i2eiroit
-¦inlon Dearborn'
Heights
t ¦• ii ¦
L— —_J
Taylor
Tecumseh
Windsor
iJrsMap Extent
Essex
Amhen-lburg
Harrow Kings vi
Legend
A CSO
¦ Industrial Outfali
I-! Detroit River Area of Concern
0
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000
Feet
Map Date: 6/2/2016
Basemap: ESRI 2014
FIGURE 1-3
CSOs and Industrial Outfalls
within the Riverbend Area
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
RB15-13
m.
Former MGP
RB15-14
RB15-10
^Nicholson-Terminal
& Dock Company
- Detroit Terminal
Riverside
RB15-09
RB15-08
West Riverfront
RB15-16
RB15-12
RB15-17
RB15-15
RB15-11
RB15-04
Riverfront
Towers
RB15-07
Detroit River
RB15-03
RB15-02FD
RB15-01
\\lovetonqis\GISdata\Federal\Midwest\Michiqan\GLAES\Riverbend\MXD\SCR\RB Figure 2-1A Sample Locations Area A.mxd
t •
Legend
© Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
Q
500 1,000
Feet
1,500
2,000
Map Date: 6/1/2016
Basemap: ESRI 2014
FIGURE 2-1A
Sample Locations - Area A
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
Former Anaconda
Wjprass Outfall
Former Mistersky
Power Plant
istoric
1 J* JFort Wayne
Former Revere
Copper & Brass
Public Access
Boat Ramp
Allied Chemical
LaFarge
Loading Dock
RB15-18
RB15-19
RB15-20
Detroit-Windsor
Truck Ferry
lf
RB15-23
RB15-21
RB15-24
Zug
Island
RB 15-26
RB 15-27
RB 15-28
Legend
© Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
Q
400
Map Date: 6/1/2016
Basemap: ESRI 2014
600
Feet
1,200
1,600
FIGURE 2-1B
Sample Locations - Area B
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
CO
LO
CO
CM
T—
O
CD CO
CO
LO
CO
CM
T—
¦«—
¦*—
¦*—
T—
t—
¦*—
¦*—
O O
o
O
o
o
o
O
o
in
if)
uO
uO
LO
LO
LO
uO
LO LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
CQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
CD
ir
or
01
01
01
01
01
(r.
01 01
01
01
01
Ol
Ol
Ol
tx:
570
560
¦B 550
03
>
0)
LU
I 1
x
71
*
o
S
540
530
J
Legend
O Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored symbols on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored symbols on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon Total (ND = 0) PCB Aroclor results.
- No ponar sample was collected at RB15-12
due to field conditions.
Total (ND = 0) PCB Aroclor Cone.
>3x PEC (2,028 pg/kg)
>2x PEC (1,352 pg/kg) and <3x PEC (2,028 pg/kg)
>PEC (676 pg/kg) and <2x PEC (1,352 pg/kg)
>TEC (59.8 pg/kg) and
-------
VICINITY MAP
CO
CM
CIS
IX
CM
CD
IX
CD
CM
CD
ix
in
CM
CD
a;
CM
CD
IX
CO
CM
CD
a:
CM
CM
CD
tx
T- O
CM CM
CO CD
or
_a>
LU
530
i
520
Legend
O Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored symbols on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored symbols on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon Total (ND = 0) PCB Aroclor results.
Total (ND = 0) PCB Aroclor Cone.
>3x PEC (2,028 pg/kg)
>2x PEC (1,352 pg/kg) and <3x PEC (2,028 pg/kg)
>PEC (676 pg/kg) and <2x PEC (1,352 pg/kg)
>TEC (59.8 pg/kg) and
-------
CO
m
CO
CNJ
T_
o
CD CO
CO
LO
CO
CNJ
T—
¦*—
¦«—
•*—
T—
¦«—
¦*—
O O
o
O
O
o
o
O
o
LO
LO
lO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
CD
tY.
01
ai
01
[r.
tr.
IY. QZ
HI
01
01
01
01
01
a:
570
560
T
8
p 550
03
>
_CD
LU
nu
*
t
540
530
Legend
O Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored symbols on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored symbols on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon Total (ND = % RL) 17 PAH results.
- No ponar sample was collected at RB15-12
due to field conditions.
Total (ND = Vz RL) 17 PAHs
Concentrations
>10x PEC (228,000 pg/kg)
>3x PEC (68.400 pg/kg) and <10x PEC (228,000 pg/kg)
>2x PEC (45,600 pg/kg) and <3x PEC (68,400 pg/kg)
>PEC (22,800 pg/kg) and <2x PEC (45,600 pg/kg)
>TEC (1,610 pg/kg) and
-------
VICINITY MAP
CO
CM
CIS
IX
CM
CD
IX
CD
CM
CD
ix
in
CM
CD
a;
CM
CD
IX
CO
CM
CD
a:
CM
CM
CD
tx
T- O
CM CM
CO CD
or
_a>
LU
1
i
i
530
520
*
i
Legend
O Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored symbols on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored symbols on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon Total (ND = % RL) 17 PAH results.
Total (ND = Vz RL) 17 PAHs
Concentrations
>10x PEC (228,000 pg/kg)
>3x PEC (68.400 pg/kg) and <10x PEC (228,000 pg/kg)
>2x PEC (45,600 pg/kg) and <3x PEC (68,400 pg/kg)
>PEC (22,800 pg/kg) and <2x PEC (45,600 pg/kg)
>TEC (1,610 pg/kg) and
-------
CD
LO
"3-
CO
CM
O
CO
CO
LO
CO
CM
¦*—
¦«—
¦*—
t—
¦*—
¦*—
t—
o o
o
O
O
O
o
O
O
s
in
LO
LO
lO
lO
lO
LO
LO
LO LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
CD
iX
a:
ir.
iY.
ir.
iY.
{r.
cm
t Y. (H
tr.
tr.
a:
a:
Qf
570
Legend
O Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored symbols on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored symbols on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon arsenic results.
- No ponar sample was collected at RB15-12
due to field conditions.
Arsenic Concentrations
>3x PEC (99 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (66 mg/kg) and <3x PEC (99 mg/kg)
>PEC (33 mg/kg) and <2x PEC (66 mg/kg)
>TEC (9.79 mg/kg) and
-------
CO
CM
CIS
IX
CM
CD
IX
CD
CM
CD
ix
in
CM
CD
a:
CM
CD
IX
CO
CM
CD
a:
CM
CM
CD
tx
T- O
CM CM
CO CD
or
_a)
LU
530
i
520
Legend
O Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored symbols on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored symbols on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon arsenic results.
Arsenic Concentrations
>3x PEC (99 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (66 mg/kg) and <3x PEC (99 mg/kg)
>PEC (33 mg/kg) and <2x PEC (66 mg/kg)
>TEC (9.79 mg/kg) and
-------
VICINITY MAP
Legend
O Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored symbols on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored symbols on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon cadmium results.
- No ponar sample was collected at RB15-12
due to field conditions.
Cadmium Concentrations
>3x PEC (14.94 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (9.96 mg/kg) and <3x PEC (14.94 mg/kg)
>PEC (4.98 mg/kg) and <2x PEC (9.96 mg/kg)
>TEC (0.99 mg/kg) and
-------
CO
CM
CIS
IX
CM
CD
IX
CD
CM
CD
ix
in
CM
CD
a:
CM
CD
IX
CO
CM
CD
a:
CM
CM
CD
tx
T- O
CM CM
CO CD
or
_a>
LU
530
fi
I
i
f
«!
f
1
520
Legend
O Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored symbols on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored symbols on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon cadmium results.
Cadmium Concentrations
>3x PEC (14.94 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (9.96 mg/kg) and <3x PEC (14.94 mg/kg)
>PEC (4.98 mg/kg) and <2x PEC (9.96 mg/kg)
>TEC (0.99 mg/kg) and
-------
CD
LO
CO
CM
o
CD CO
CO
LO
-<3-
CO
CM
T—
t—
t—
¦*—
¦*—
¦*—
O O
o
O
o
O
o
O
o
«¦
LO
lO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
]
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
m
cm
cm
(m
{m
cm
HI
cm
tm
cm cm
(m
im
cm
im
cm
cm
i
570
560
¦M 550
03
>
_0)
LU
8
V
.
t
540
530
:
8
Legend
O Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored symbols on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored symbols on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon chromium results.
- No ponar sample was collected at RB15-12
due to field conditions.
Chromium Concentrations
>3x PEC (333 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (222 mg/kg) and <3x PEC (333 mg/kg)
>PEC (111 mg/kg) and <2x PEC (222 mg/kg)
>TEC (43.4 mg/kg) and
-------
560
CO
CM
i^-
CM
CD
CM
in
CM
CM
CO
CM
CM
CM
T- O
CM CM
CIS
IX
CD
en
m
cc
CD
a:
CD
en
CD
a:
OS
cn
CO CQ
en en
CQ
cn
CD
a:
n u •
!*,
U n
DO *
-
. . . . _ I
5 • •
t
n/y
RBI 5-18
315:
RB15-21
RBI 5-22
RBI 5-23
RBI 5-24
¦ RB 15-25
1
RB 15-26
Riven
Detroit
1—j RB15-27
RB15-281
JiJ
Legend
O Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored symbols on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored symbols on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon chromium results.
Chromium Concentrations
>3x PEC (333 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (222 mg/kg) and <3x PEC (333 mg/kg)
>PEC (111 mg/kg) and <2x PEC (222 mg/kg)
>TEC (43.4 mg/kg) and
-------
CO
LO
CO
CM
T—
O
(J) CO
CO
LO
CO
CM
T—
¦*—
t—
•*—
T—
¦*—
o o
o
o
O
o
o
O
o
uO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
CD
DO
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
CO
[r.
tr.
[r.
tr.
(H
01 Ql
(H
or
iH
ctr
C£
cr
Legend
O Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored symbols on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored symbols on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon copper results.
- No ponar sample was collected at RB15-12
due to field conditions.
Copper Concentrations
>3x PEC (447 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (298 mg/kg) and <3x PEC (447 mg/kg)
>PEC (149 mg/kg) and <2x PEC (298 mg/kg)
>TEC (31.6 mg/kg) and
-------
CO
CM
CIS
IX
CM
CD
IX
CD
CM
CD
ix
in
CM
CD
a:
CM
CD
IX
CO
CM
CD
a:
CM
CM
CD
tx
T- O
CM CM
CO CD
or
_a>
LU
530
i
I
4
t I
i
520
Legend
O Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored symbols on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored symbols on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon copper results.
Copper Concentrations
>3x PEC (447 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (298 mg/kg) and <3x PEC (447 mg/kg)
>PEC (149 mg/kg) and <2x PEC (298 mg/kg)
>TEC (31.6 mg/kg) and
-------
CO
uo
CO
CM
y—
O
CO
CO
LO
CO
CM
T—
t—
t—
¦«—
T—
o o
o
O
O
O
o
O
o
uO
LO
LT)
uO
LT)
LT)
LO
LO
LO LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
CO
(m
Q1
C£
(m
CH
Cm
cm
cm
cm
cm
cm
o:
570
560
¦M 550
03
>
0)
LU
n*
T
i
-t-
540
530
t
Legend
O Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored symbols on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored symbols on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon iron results.
- No ponar sample was collected at RB15-12
due to field conditions.
iron Concentrations
>3x PEC (120,000 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (80,000 mg/kg)
and <3x PEC (120,000 mg/kg)
>PEC (40,000 mg/kg) and <2x PEC (80,000 mg/kg)
>TEC (20,000 mg/kg) and
-------
V- o
CM CM
Iron Concentrations
- Colored symbols on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored symbols on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon iron results.
Legend
O Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
>3x PEC (120,000 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (80,000 mg/kg)
and <3x PEC (120,000 mg/kg)
>PEC (40,000 mg/kg) and <2x PEC (80,000 mg/kg)
>TEC (20,000 mg/kg) and
-------
CD
LO
CO
CM
O
_0)
LU
T
i
rrt
~ *
540
530
I
Legend
O Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored symbols on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored symbols on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon lead results.
- No ponar sample was collected at RB15-12
due to field conditions.
Lead Concentrations
>3x PEC (384 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (256 mg/kg) and <3x PEC (384 mg/kg)
>PEC (128 mg/kg) and <2x PEC (256 mg/kg)
>TEC (35.8 mg/kg) and
-------
CO
CM
CIS
IX
CM
CD
IX
CD
CM
CD
ix
in
CM
CD
a:
CM
CD
IX
CO
CM
CD
a:
CM
CM
CD
tx
T- O
CM CM
CO CD
or
_a>
LU
i
I
I
530
520
i
Legend
O Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored symbols on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored symbols on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon lead results.
Lead Concentrations
>3x PEC (384 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (256 mg/kg) and <3x PEC (384 mg/kg)
>PEC (128 mg/kg) and <2x PEC (256 mg/kg)
>TEC (35.8 mg/kg) and
-------
CD
LO
"3"
CO
CM
o
CD CO
CD
LO
CO
CM
¦*—
T—
¦«—
T—
T—
O O
o
O
o
o
O
O
O
*
in
lO
uO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
03
or
or
or
ctr
cH
t r. a:
ctr
[H
[r.
(r.
q:
570
Legend
O Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored symbols on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored symbols on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon mercury results.
- No ponar sample was collected at RB15-12
due to field conditions.
Mercury Concentrations
>3x PEC (3.18 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (2.12 mg/kg) and <3x PEC (3.18 mg/kg)
>PEC (1.06 mg/kg) and <2x PEC (2.12 mg/kg)
>TEC (0.18 mg/kg) and
-------
T- O
CM CM
Mercury Concentrations
>3x PEC (3.18 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (2.12 mg/kg) and <3x PEC (3.18 mg/kg)
>PEC (1.06 mg/kg) and <2x PEC (2.12 mg/kg)
>TEC (0.18 mg/kg) and
-------
CO
LO
CO
CM
T_
o
CD CO
CO
LO
CO
CM
T—
t—
T—
¦«—
¦*—
o o
o
O
O
o
o
O
o
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
0Q
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
ca
OZ
C£
[r.
iH
(r.
ir.
C£
ctr OZ
(r.
iH
tH
ir.
tr
570
560
¦J§ 550
03
>
0)
LU
IT*
I
i
540
530
Legend
O Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored symbols on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored symbols on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon nickel results.
- No ponar sample was collected at RB15-12
due to field conditions.
Nickel Concentrations
>3x PEC (145.8 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (97.2 mg/kg) and <3x PEC (145.8 mg/kg)
>PEC (48.6 mg/kg) and <2x PEC (97.2 mg/kg)
>TEC (22.7 mg/kg) and
-------
T- O
CM CM
Nickel Concentrations
>3x PEC (145.8 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (97.2 mg/kg) and <3x PEC (145.8 mg/kg)
>PEC (48.6 mg/kg) and <2x PEC (97.2 mg/kg)
>TEC (22.7 mg/kg) and
-------
VICINITY MAP
1 .11
CD
m
"3"
CO
CM
T—
o
(J) CO
CO
LO
CO
CM
T—
T—
T—
¦*—
¦*—
t—
O O
o
o
O
o
o
O
o
LO
LO
LO
LO
uo
LO
uO
LO
LO LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
CQ
DO
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
a:
or
[r
ctr
C£ q:
ctr
(Y.
(Y.
OZ
a:
or
570
Legend
O Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored symbols on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored symbols on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon silver results.
- No ponar sample was collected at RB15-12
due to field conditions.
Silver Concentrations
>3x PEC (6.6 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (4.4 mg/kg) and <3x PEC (6.6 mg/kg)
>PEC (2.2 mg/kg) and <2x PEC (4.4 mg/kg)
>TEC (1.6 mg/kg) and
-------
V- o
CM CM
Silver Concentrations
>3x PEC (6.6 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (4.4 mg/kg) and <3x PEC (6.6 mg/kg)
>PEC (2.2 mg/kg) and <2x PEC (4.4 mg/kg)
>TEC (1.6 mg/kg) and
-------
i-^n
¦Ot } \r
CD
LO
CO
CM
O
CD CO
CO
LO
CO
CM
T—
¦*—
T—
t—
¦«—
t—
¦*—
¦*—
O O
o
O
O
o
o
O
o
5
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
uO
LO
LO LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
J
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
CD
ir.
q:
a:
OZ
(H
OZ
(Z
t r. OZ
tr.
tH
(H
tH
a:
01
1
570
560
¦B 550
03
>
©
LU
540
530
i
1
*
I*
T
s
Legend
O Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored symbols on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored symbols on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon zinc results.
- No ponar sample was collected at RB15-12
due to field conditions.
Zinc Concentrations
>3x PEC (1,377 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (918 mg/kg) and <3x PEC (1,377 mg/kg)
>PEC (459 mg/kg) and <2x PEC (918 mg/kg)
>TEC (121 mg/kg) and SPEC (459 mg/kg)
-------
T- O
CM CM
Zinc Concentrations
>3x PEC (1,377 mg/kg)
>2x PEC (918 mg/kg) and <3x PEC (1,377 mg/kg)
>PEC (459 mg/kg) and <2x PEC (918 mg/kg)
>TEC (121 mg/kg) and SPEC (459 mg/kg)
-------
RB15-13
RB15-12
RB15-11
r— RB15-07
RB15-06
RB15-05
RB15-18
RB15-17
RB15-08
RB15-23
RB15-16
RB15-04
RB15-19
RB15-09
Detroit River
RB15-15
RB15-03
RB15-20
RB15-24
RB15-10
RB15-14
RB15-02
RB 15-21
RB15-01
RB 15-26
RB15-27
RB15-28
Legend
TPH Concentrations
G
Sample Location
•
>10,000 mg/kg
•
< 10,000 mg/kg
Q
< 5,000 mg/kg
•
< 1,000 mg/kg
•
< 100 mg/kg
n Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored symbols on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- No ponar sample was collected at RB15-12
due to field conditions.
Q
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000
Feet
Map Date: 6/1/2016
Basemap: ESRI 2014
FIGURE 3-13
Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
(IDR0+0R0) (mg/kg)
Detected in the Riverbend Area
Riverbend Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
RB15-13
RB15-14
RB15-10
RB15-09
RB15-08
RB15-16
RB15-12
RB15-17
RB15-15
RB15-11
RB15-04
RB15-07
Detroit River
RB15-03
RB15-02FD
RB15-01
\\lovetonqis\GISdata\Federal\Midwest\Michiqan\GLAES\Riverbend\MXD\SCR\RB Figure 3-14ATPH-DRO Area A.mxd
Legend
• Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored symbols on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Sample results and SSRSLs are displayed
on Table 3-8.
- No ponar sample was collected at RB15-12
due to field conditions.
TPH-DRO Concentrations
> 3x Sample-Specific Risk
Screening Level mg/kg
> 2x Sample-Specific Risk
Screening Level mg/kg
> 1x Sample-Specific Risk
Screening Level mg/kg
Does Not Exceed SSRSL
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000
Feet
Map Date: 6/23/2016
FIGURE 3-14A
Diesel Range Organics (mg/kg)
in Area A Compared to
Sample-Specific Risk Screening Levels
Riverbend Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
RB15-18
RB15-19
RB15-20
RB15-21
RB15-22
RB15-23
RB 15-24
RB15-25
RB 15-28
\\lovetonqis\GISdata\Federal\Midwest\Michiqan\GLAES\Riverbend\MXD\SCR\RB Figure 3-14B I PH-DRO Area B.nixd
Legend
• Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored symbols on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Sample results and SSRSLs are displayed
on Table 3-8.
TPH-DRO Concentrations
> 3x Sample-Specific Risk
Screening Level mg/kg
> 2x Sample-Specific Risk
Screening Level mg/kg
> 1x Sample-Specific Risk
Screening Level mg/kg
Does Not Exceed SSRSL
Q
q 400 600 1,200 1.600
Feet
Map Date: 6/23/2016
Basemap: ESRI 2014
FIGURE 3-14B
Diesel Range Organics (mg/kg)
in Area B Compared to
Sample-Specific Risk Screening Levels
Riverbend Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
RB15-13
RB15-14
RB15-10
RB15-09
RB15-08
RB15-16
RB15-12
RB15-17
RB15-15
RB15-11
RB15-04
RB15-07
Detroit River
RB15-03
RB15-02FD
RB15-01
\\lovetonqis\GISdata\Federal\Midwest\Michiqan\GLAES\Riverbend\MXD\SCR\RB Figure 3-15ATPH-ORO Area A.mxd
Legend
• Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored symbols on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Sample results and SSRSLs are displayed
on Table 3-8.
- No ponar sample was collected at RB15-12
due to field conditions.
TPH-ORO Concentrations
> 3x Sample-Specific Risk
Screening Level mg/kg
> 2x Sample-Specific Risk
Screening Level mg/kg
> 1x Sample-Specific Risk
Screening Level mg/kg
Does Not Exceed SSRSL
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000
Feet
Map Date: 6/23/2016
FIGURE 3-15A
Oil Range Organics (mg/kg)
in Area A Compared to
Sample-Specific Risk Screening Levels
Riverbend Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
RB15-18
RB15-19
RB15-20
RB15-21
RB15-22
RB15-23
RB 15-24
RB15-25
RB 15-28
\\lovetonqis\GISdata\Federal\Midwest\Michiqan\GLAES\Riverbend\MXD\SCR\RB Figure 3-15B I PH-ORO Area B.mx.d
Legend
• Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored symbols on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Sample results and SSRSLs are displayed
on Table 3-8.
TPH-ORO Concentrations
> 3x Sample-Specific Risk
Screening Level mg/kg
> 2x Sample-Specific Risk
Screening Level mg/kg
> 1x Sample-Specific Risk
Screening Level mg/kg
Does Not Exceed SSRSL
Q
400
800
1,200
1,600
Feet
Map Date: 6/23/2016
Basemap: ESRI 2014
FIGURE 3-15B
Oil Range Organics (mg/kg)
in Area B Compared to
Sample-Specific Risk Screening Levels
Riverbend Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
CO
LO
"3"
CO
CM
T—
O
CD CO
CO
LO
CO
CM
T—
T—
¦«—
¦*—
¦«—
¦*—
O O
o
O
O
o
o
O
o
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
CD
tY.
01
01
ir.
01
ctr
C£
tr.
IY. QZ
a:
01
01
01
01
01
a:
570
560
¦B 550
03
>
0)
LU
V
n
-o-
540
530
I
Legend
• Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored symbols on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored symbols on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon ESBTU results.
- ESBTUs were calculated using total 34 PAHs.
- No ponar sample was collected at RB15-12
due to field conditions.
ESBTUs for PAHs
> 10
> 7,5 and < 10
> 1 and < 7.5
< 1
Q
500 1,000
Feet
1,500
2,000
Map Date: 6/1/2016
Basemap: ESRI 2014
FIGURE 4-1A
ESBTUs for PAHs in Area A
Riverbend Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
RBI 5-17
RB15-03
RB15-02FD
RB15-01
| RBI 5-131
IRB15-141-
| RB15-161
|RB15-15[
ID e tro itRiverl
IRB15-12]
[RB15-11
RB15-10
RB15-09
RB15-08
j RB15-051
j RB 15-061
IRB15-071
RB 15-04
-------
T- O
CM CM
ESBTUs for PAHs
> 10
> 7,5 and < 10
> 1 and < 7.5
- Colored symbols on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored symbols on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon ESBTU results.
- ESBTUs were calculated using total 34 PAHs.
SI
I
~
B
I
Legend
• Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
Q
400
800
1,200
1,600
Feet
Map Date: 6/1/2016
Basemap: ESRI 2014
¦
FIGURE 4-1B
ESBTUs for PAHs in Area B
Riverbend Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
RB15-24
~ »r f I
il
1''
53ui,
L
RB15-23
RB15-22
| RB15-201
j RB15-21
RB15-19
RB15-18
RB 15-25
RB 15-26
IRB15-271
IRB15-281
\\lovetonqis\GISdata\Federal\Midwest\Michiqan\GLAES\Riverbend\MXD\SCR\RB Figure 4-1B ESBTU Area B.rrrxd
Kr'v
-------
RB15-13
RB15-14
RB15-10
RB15-09
RB15-08
RB15-16
RB15-12
RB15-17
RB15-15
RB15-11
RB15-04
RB15-07
Detroit River
RB15-03
RB15-02FD
RB15-01
\\lovetonqis\GISdata\Federal\Midwest\Michiqan\GLAES\Riverbend\MXD\SCR\RB Figure 4-2A ESBTU Metals Area A.mxd
* 5T •
Legend
O Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored symbols on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Locations are color coded based
upon ESBTU results.
- No ponar sample was collected at RB15-12
due to field conditions.
ESBTU Metals Concentrations
>3,000 jjmol/goc
>130 |jmol/goc and <3,000 |jmol/goc
<130 (jmol/goc
Q
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000
Feet
Map Date: 5/4/2016
FIGURE 4-2A
ESBTUs for Metals in Area A
Riverbend Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
RB15-24
RB15-25
RB 15-28
\\lovetonqis\GISdata\Federal\Midwest\Michiqan\GLAES\Riverbend\MXD\SCR\RB Figure 4-2B ESBTU Metals Area B.mxd
1
RB15-18
RBI 5-23
RB 15-22
RB 15-20
j RB15-21
RB15-19
Legend
O Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored symbols on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Locations are color coded based
upon ESBTU results.
ESBTU Metals Concentrations
>3,000 jjmol/goc
>130 |jmol/goc and <3,000 |jmol/goc
<130 (jmol/goc
Q
0 400 800 1,200 1,600
Feet
Map Date: 5/4/2016
FIGURE 4-2B
ESBTUs for Metals in Area B
Riverbend Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
CO
LO
"3"
CO
CM
T—
O
CD CO
CO
LO
CO
CM
T—
¦«—
¦«—
¦*—
O O
o
O
O
o
o
O
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
LO
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T— T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
T—
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
DQ
CQ
tY.
01
01
ir.
01
ctr
C£
tr.
IY. QZ
a:
01
01
01
01
a:
Legend
O Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored symbols on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored symbols on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon PEC-Q results.
- No ponar sample was collected at RB15-12
due to field conditions.
Mean PEC-Q Value
(mean PEC-Q metals +
PEC-Q Total PAHs +
PEC-Q Total PCBs)/3
> 1 and < 5
> 0,5 and < 1
< 0.5
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000
Feet
Map Date: 5/4/2016
Basemap: ESRI 2014
FIGURE 5-1A
PEC-Qs for Area A
Riverbend Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
RB15-13
RB15-14
RB15-10
RB15-09
RB15-08
RB15-16
RB15-12
RBI 5-17
RB15-15
RB15-11
RB15-04
RB15-07
RB15-03
RB15-02FD
RB15-01
-------
Legend
O Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
- Colored symbols on the map
represent the ponar sample results (0-0.5 feet).
- Colored symbols on the graphs
represent the sonic core sample results (generally 0-1 foot;
1-3 feet; and 2 foot intervals thereafter).
- Locations are color coded based
upon PEC-Q results.
Mean PEC-Q Value
(mean PEC-Q metals +
PEC-Q Total PAHs +
PEC-Q Total PCBs)/3
> 1 and < 5
> 0,5 and < 1
T- O
CM CM
400
800
1,200
1,600
Feet
Map Date: 5/4/2016
Basemap: ESRI 2014
¦
FIGURE 5-1B
PEC-Qs for Area B
Riverbend Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
RB15-18
RB15-19
RB15-20
RB15-21
RB15-23
RB15-24
RB15-25
J •
\\iovetonqis\tji^aata\i-eaerai\iviiawesT\iviicniqan\ULAL^\Kiverpena\iviAU\bOK\KB i-iqure o-1 b Hhuu Area B.mxa
RB15-28
RB15-22
-------
Hot Spot 2
42,000 cu yds
Total 17 PAHs
RB15-13
Hot Spot 1
461,000 cu yds
Total 17 PAHs
RB15-12
RB15-08
RB15-04
RB15-16
RB15-11
RB15-05
RB15-06
RB15-03
Detroit River
\\lovetonqis\GISdata\Federal\Midwest\Michiqan\GLAES\Riverbeiid\MXD\SCR\RB Figure 6-1A Kriqinq Results Area A.mxd
Legend
O Sample Location
¦ > 3X PEC
¦ > 2X PEC
~ > PEC
Note:
The predominant constituent contributing to the
exceedance is named in the hot spot label box.
Map Date: 6/1/2016
Basemap: ESRI 2014
Figure 6-1A
Spatial Analysis for All Constituents
in Area A
Riverbend Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
Hot Spot 3
163,000 cu yds
Copper
RB15-24
\\lovetonqis\GISdata\Federal\Midwest\Michiqan\GLAES\Riverbend\MXD\SCR\RB Figure 6-1B Kriqinq Results Area B.mxd
I 'J"
nrvul% ' i
RB 15-26
RB 15-271
|RB15-28
Hot Spot 4
83,000 cu yds I
Total 17 PAHs
RB 15-22
RB 15-231
| RB 15-191
| RB 15-20
RB 15-21
RB15-18
Legend
O Sample Location
¦ > 3X PEC
~ > 2X PEC
~ > PEC
Note:
The predominant constituent contributing to the
exceedance is named in the hot spot label box.
500 U)00 1,500 2,000
Feet
Map Date: 6/1/2016
Basemap: ESRI 2014
FIGURE 6-1B
Spatial Analysis for All Constituents
in Area A
Riverbend Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
RB15-09
Analvte
Result
Total 17 PAHs:
92250
Total PCBs:
856
fft
_
—
n|
ilUt
air
if.:
RB15-07
Analvte
Result
Total 17 PAHs:
37610
Total PCBs:
860
Lead:
237
m
I
/
RB15-05
Analvte
Result
Total 17 PAHs:
151350
Lead:
151
RB15-04
Analvte
Result
Total 17 PAHs:
325090
jf
Total PCBs:
740
Chromium:
272
Copper:
677
Lead:
1050
J
Mercury:
3.3
Nickel:
159
Silver:
23.4
Zinc:
843
f
>p 2
*/
>;/ETT
^*Wl!
iL
j£f{p
RB15-06
Analvte
Result
Total 17 PAHs:
25610
Mercury:
2.8
RB15-03
Analvte
Result
Total 17 PAHs:
262500
Cadmium
56.3
Chromium:
289
Copper:
435
Lead:
967
Mercury:
7.1
Nickel:
127
Silver:
11.2
Zinc:
1440
I w ' M
JP^
<*/
yf
¦ t
wt
(.*•
Detroit River
Analyte
Unit
PEC
PECx2
PECx3
Total 17 PAHs ND=l/2 RL
ug/kg
22800
45600
68400
Total PCBs ND=0
ug/kg
676
1352
2028
Arsenic
mg/kg
33
66
99
Cadmium
mg/kg
4.98
9.96
14.9
Chromium
mg/kg
111
222
333
Copper
mg/kg
149
298
447
Iron
mg/kg
40000
80000
120000
Lead
mg/kg
128
256
384
Mercury
mg/kg
1.06
2.12
3.18
Nickel
mg/kg
48.6
97.2
146
Silver
mg/kg
2.2
4.4
6.6
Zinc
mg/kg
459
918
_
1377
%§£
m i
r
'.I1 Uf
" *0
MB
. «U+
RB15-02
Analvte
Result
Total 17 PAHs:
743600
Total PCBs:
2560
Cadmium:
9.6
Copper:
312
Lead:
675
Mercury:
2.8
Nickel:
59.8
Silver:
4.7
Zinc:
749
**4
jHt
EFT*» "*
> • »£f
b#1R
f '.*&-* Mmf«CS!
»P2* 'k £_* i?. w
,y>#Kj
gflffiEfflsFj:
r a&tfi r
RB15-01
Analvte
Result
Total 17 PAHs:
40690
Total PCBs:
9940
Cadmium:
6.6
Chromium:
145
Copper:
165
Lead:
387
Mercury:
1.5
Nickel:
89.5
Silver:
6.2
Zinc:
700
\\lovetonqis\qisdata\Federal\Midwest\Michiqan\GLAbS\Riyerbend\MXD\SCR\RB Figure 6-2 Hot Spot l.rnxd
Legend
O Sample Location
~ CSO
¦ Industrial Outfall
¦ > 3X PEC
~ > 2X PEC
~ > PEC
NOTE:
Results shown are maximum exceedances of PEC.
Estimated volume = 461,000 cu yd
0 200 400 600 800
Feet
Map Date: 6/6/2016
Basemap: ESRI 2014
¦
FIGURE 6-2
Hot Spot 1
Riverbend Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
Analyte
Unit
PEC
PECx2
PECx3 j
Total 17 PAHs ND=l/2 RL
ug/kg
22800
45600
68400 '
Total PCBs ND=0
ug/kg
676
1352
2028
Arsenic
mg/kg
33
66
99
Cadmium
mg/kg
4.98
9.96
14.9
Chromium
mg/kg
111
222
333
Copper
mg/kg
149
298
447
Iron
mg/kg
40000
80000
120000
Lead
mg/kg
128
256
384
Mercury
mg/kg
1.06
2.12
3.18
Nickel
mg/kg
48.6
97.2
146
Silver
mg/kg
2.2
4.4
6.6
Zinc
mg/kg
459
918
1377
Ja
RB15-14
Analvte
* v '• "
RB15-15
Analvte
Result
Total 17 PAHs:
1146200
Copper:
165
Lead:
380
Mercury:
2.7
Silver:
4.4
Total 17 PAHs:
Total PCBs:
Copper:
Iron:
Lead:
Mercury:
Zinc:
RB15-16
Analvte
Result
Total 17 PAHs:
3160500
Copper:
245
Lead:
394
Mercury:
2.3
Zinc:
523
BsSjsBU^hs?
RB15-13
Analvte
Result
Total 17 PAHs:
1243500 1
Total PCBs:
4070
Lead:
675 |
Nickel:
52.4 |!
Zinc:
859 |
\\lovetonqis\qisdata\Federal\Midwest\Michiqan\GLAES\Riverbend\MXD\SCR\RB Figure 6-3 Hot Spot 2.mxd
Result
1320600
970
214
50600
RB15-11
Analvte
Total 17 PAHs
Lead:
Result
874100
RB15-12
Analvte
Total 17 PAHs
Total PCBs:
Chromium:
Copper:
Lead:
Mercury:
Zinc:
Result
182230000
Legend
O Sample Location
A CSO
¦ Industrial Outfall
¦ > 3X PEC
~ > 2X PEC
~ > PEC
NOTE:
Results shown are maximum exceedarices of PEC.
Estimated volume = 42,000 cu yd
100 200 300 400
Feet
Map Date: 6/6/2016
Basemap: ESRI 2014
¦
FIGURE 6-3
Hot Spot 2
Riverbend Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
Analyte
Unit
PEC
PECx2
PECx3
Total 17 PAHs ND=l/2 RL
ug/kg
22800
45600
68400
Total PCBs ND=0
ug/kg
676
1352
2028
Arsenic
mg/kg
33
66
99
Cadmium
mg/kg
4.98
9.96
14.9
Chromium
mg/kg
111
222
333
Copper
mg/kg
149
298
447
Iron
mg/kg
40000
80000
120000
Lead
mg/kg
128
256
384
Mercury
mg/kg
1.06
2.12
3.18
Nickel
mg/kg
48.6
97.2
146
Silver
mg/kg
2.2
4.4
6.6
Zinc
mg/kg
459
918
1377
RB15-23
Analvte
Result
Total 17 PAHs:
336900
Cadmium:
49.3
Chromium:
333
Copper:
1190
Lead:
604
Mercury:
9.2
Nickel:
132
Silver:
6.1
Zinc:
3450
—j RB15-25
RB15-24
Analvte
Result
Total 17 PAHs:
428550
Total PCBs:
810
Arsenic:
191
Cadmium:
12.4
Chromium:
153
Copper:
1000
Lead:
677
Mercury:
5.3
Nickel:
75.6
Silver:
4.9
Zinc:
2080
\\lovetonqis\qisdata\Federal\Midwest\Michiqan\GLAbS\Riverbend\MXD\SCR\RB Figure 6-4 Hot Spot 3.mxd
RB15-20
Analvte
Total 17 PAHs:
Cadmium:
Chromium:
Copper:
Lead:
Mercury:
Nickel:
Silver:
Zinc:
RB15-22
Analvte
Total 17 PAHs:
Total PCBs:
Cadmium:
Chromium:
Copper:
Lead:
Mercury:
Nickel:
Silver:
Zinc:
Result
288100
1050
28
210
1540
408
4.9
122
5.2
3790
RB15-19
Analvte
Result
Total 17 PAHs:
98470
Total PCBs:
1340
Copper:
315
Lead:
141
Mercury:
16-5
RB15-18
Analvte
Result
Total 17 PAHs:
48730
Copper:
5250
Lead:
128
Result
87070
42.6
683
6100
858
3.9
108
9.2
14500
Result
46765
5.5
151
RB15-21
Analvte
Total 17 PAHs
Cadmium:
Chromium:
Copper:
Lead:
Zinc:
Legend
O Sample Location
~ cso
¦ Industrial Outfall
¦ > 3X PEC
~ > 2X PEC
~ > PEC
NOTE:
Results shown are maximum exceedarices of PEC.
Estimated volume = 163,000 cu yd
200 400 600 800
Feet
Map Date: 6/6/2016
Basemap: ESRI 2014
FIGURE 6-4
Hot Spot 3
Riverbend Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
Analyte
Unit
PEC
PECx2
PECx3
Total 17 PAHs ND=l/2 RL
ug/kg
22800
45600
68400
Total PCBs ND=0
ug/kg
676
1352
2028
Arsenic
mg/kg
33
66
99
Cadmium
mg/kg
4.98
9.96
14.9
Chromium
mg/kg
111
222
333
Copper
mg/kg
149
298
447
Iron
mg/kg
40000
80000
120000
Lead
mg/kg
128
256
384
Mercury
mg/kg
1.06
2.12
3.18
Nickel
mg/kg
48.6
97.2
146
Silver
mg/kg
2.2
4.4
6.6
Zinc
mg/kg
459
918
1377
~ ™ J
ill -
\ VI
T,
VI
RB15-28
Analvte
Resuit
mm
0 ¦
Total 17 PAHs:
58560
Chromium:
162
¦
V.
Lead:
1970
RB 15-25
c
©
- RB15-26
RB15-27
Analvte
Result
Total 17 PAHs:
1960800
Cadmium:
21.5
Chromium:
140
Copper:
556
Lead:
459
Mercury:
4.3
Nickel:
68.9
Silver:
4.0
Zinc:
1220
Q
100 200 300 400
Feet
Map Date: 6/6/2016
Basemap: ESRI 2014
¦
FIGURE 6-5
Hot Spot 4
Riverbend Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
Legend
O Sample Location
A CSO
¦ Industrial Outfall
¦ > 3X PEC
~ > 2X PEC
~ > PEC
NOTE:
Results shown are maximum exceedances of PEC.
Estimated volume = 83,000 cu yd
VVi|id£.Of
Extent 2
-------
RBI 5-13
Ratio (2.5-3.5 ft): 16.52
RB15-12
Ratio (0 -1 ft): 202.82
RB15-14
Ratio (1 -3 ft): 38.19
I
RB15-11
Ratio (0 - 0.5 ft): 39.88
RB15-17
Ratio (0 -1 ft): 3.57
RB15-09
Ratio (0 -1 ft): 24.06
RB15-04
Ratio (0-0.5 ft): 12.49
Metals ESBTU: 684.81 |jmol/g(
RB 15-05
Ratio (0 - 1 ft): 19.27
RB15-03
Ratio (3-5 ft): 10.39
RB15-16
Ratio (1 -3 ft): 109.95
RB 15-10
Ratio (0 -1 ft): 0.70
RB 15-06
Ratio (0 - 0.5 ft): 2.59
RB15-15
Ratio (2 - 4 ft): 65.70
RB 15-01
Ratio (3-5 ft): 1.93
RB 15-07
Ratio (0 - 0.5 ft): 4.21
RB15-08
Ratio (0 - 0.5 ft): 2.49
\\lovetonqis\GISdata\Federal\Midwest\Michiqan\GLAES\Riverbend\MXD\SCR\RB Figure 6-6A ESBTU Kriqinq Results Area A.nixd
RB 15-02
Ratio (1 -3 ft): 26.55
Metals ESBTU: 221.76 jjrnol/g0
14 Wi
'x*. -r- ^ *
rv. ~ ./
Legend
0 Sample Location
1 | ESBTU >10
¦ 7.5 < ESBTU < 10
~ 1 < ESBTU < 7.5
I 1 Hot Spot
NOTE: Ratio value shown represents highest
ESBTU PAH result with associated depth (ft)
ESBTUs were calculated using total 34 PAHs.
Metals ESBTUs are noted for reference only and were
not included as inputs for the spatial analysis.
Only values greater than 130 pmol/goc are shown.
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000
Feet
Map Date: 6/21/2016
Basemap: ESRI 2014
FIGURE 6-6A
Spatial Analysis for total PAH ESBTUs
in Area A
Riverbend Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
\\lovetonqis\GISdata\Federal\Midwest\Michiqan\GLAES\Riverbend\MXD\SCR\RB Figure 6-6B ESBTU Kriqinq Results Area B.mxd
t . *
RB15-21
|Ratio (1 -2 ft): 2.37|
IRB15-20
Ratio (1 -2 ft): 4.091
RB15-25
Ratio (0 - 1 ft): 0.05
RB15-18
Ratio (0-0.5 ft): 3.441
RB15-24
| Ratio (4 - 5 ft): 12.901 I 1rb15-23
RB15-22
Ratio (3-5 ft): 8.611
RB15-19
Ratio (0-1 ft): 6.38
Metals ESBTU: 534.43 jjmol/g0
RB15-26
Ratio (0-0.5 ft): 0.88
RB15-27
Ratio (0 - 0.5 ft): 123.63
|Ratio (3-5 ft): 9.22
RB15-28
Ratio (0-0.5 ft): 3.741
E9
Z9
Legend
O Sample Location
¦ ESBTU>10
¦ 7.5 < ESBTU < 10
~ 1 < ESBTU < 7.5
~ Hot Spot
NOTE: Ratio value shown represents highest
ESBTU PAH result with associated depth (ft)
ESBTUs were calculated using total 34 PAHs.
Metals ESBTUs are noted for reference only and were
not included as inputs for the spatial analysis.
Only values greater than 130 pmol/goc are shown.
Map Date: 6/21/2016
Basemap: ESRI 2014
FIGURE 6-6B
Spatial Analysis for Total PAH ESBTUs
in Area B
Riverbend Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
RB15-12
Ratio (1 - 3 ft): 2665
L_
RB'15-11
F Ratio (0-0.5 ft): 13.05
RB15-13
Ratio (2.5-3.5 ft): 18.97
RB15-14
Ratio (1 - 3 ft): 19.70
RB15-09
Ratio (0 - 1 ft): 1.74
RB 15-04
Ratio (0 -1 ft): 6.24
RB 15-05
Ratio (0 - 1 ft): 2.41
RB15-03
Ratio (3 - 5 ft): 4.75
RB15-10
Ratio (0 - 0.5 ft): 0.43
RB 15-06
Ratio (0 - 0.5 ft): 0.75
RB15-15
Ratio (0-1 ft): 17.34
RB 15-01
Ratio (3 - 5 ft): 5.97
RB15-16
Ratio (1 - 3 ft): 46.60
RB15-07
Ratio (1 - 2 ft): 0.76
RB15-17
Ratio (0.5 -1 ft): 0.37
RB15-08
Ratio (0 - 0.5 ft): 0.56
Detroit River
RB15-02
Ratio (0-1 ft): 12.58
\\lovetonqis\GISdata\Federal\Midwest\Michiqan\GLAES\Riverbend\MXD\SCR\RB Figure 6-7A PECQ Kriqinq Results Area A.mxd
Legend
O Sample Location
¦ PECQ>5
¦ 1 < PECQ < 5
~ 0.5 < PECQ <1
~ Hot Spot
NOTE:
Mean PEC-Q Value = (Mean PEC-Q metals +
PEC-Q Total! 7 PAHs + PEC-Q Total PCBs)/3
Ratio value shown represents highest
result associated with depth (ft).
Map Date: 6/1/2016
Basemap: ESRI 2014
FIGURE 6-7A
Spatial Analysis for Mean
PEC-Qs in Area A
Riverbend Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
\\lovetonqis\GISdata\Federal\Midwest\Michiqan\GLAES\Riverbend\MXD\SCR\RB Figure 6-7B PECQ Kriqinq Results Area B.mxd
5
RB15-25
Ratio (0.5-1 ft): 0.031
RB15-26
Ratio (0-0.5 ft): 0.091
|RB15-27
[Ratio (5-6.5 ft): 29.001
RB15-28~
Ratio (0-0.5 ft): 1.701
RB15-21
Ratio (1 -2 ft): 1.481
RB 15-20
Ratio (1 -2 ft): 5.041
RB15-24
|Ratio (2-4 ft): 7.301 I 1rb15-23
RB 15-22
Ratio (3-5 ft): 5.141
RB15-19
Ratio (0-1 ft): 2.311
|Ratio (3-5 ft): 6.48
9
rz. V
k i
w-,
UU
i- tf
j Hot Spot 31
petroit Ri^r
RB15-18
Ratio (0-0.5 ft): 1.571
Legend
O Sample Location
¦ PECQ>5
¦ 1 < PECQ < 5
~ 0.5 < PECQ <1
l~l Hot Spot
MOTE:
Mean PEC-Q Value = (Mean PEC-Q metals +
PEC-Q Total 17 PAHs + PEC-Q Total PCBs)/3
Ratio value shown represents highest
result associated with depth (ft).
500 1,000 1,500 2,000
Feet
Map Date: 6/1/2016
Basemap: ESRI 2014
FIGURE 6-7B
Spatial Analysis for Mean
PEC-Qs in Area B
Riverbend Assessment of
Contaminated Sediments
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
\\lovetonqis\GISdata\Federal\Midwest\Michiqan\GLAES\Riverbend\MXD\SCR\RB Figure 7-1 MDEQ Split Sample Locations.mxd
KB 15-13
RB15-15
RB15- 4
RB15-16
RB15-12
RBI 5-11
Detroit River
Legend
© Sample Location
Detroit River Area of Concern (AOC)
NOTE:
No samples from RB15-11 were selected by
the MDEQ onsite representative to be submitted for
the additional analyses.
Q
50 100 150 200
Feet
Map Date: 6/1/2016
Basemap: ESRI 2014
FIGURE 7-1
MDEQ Split Sample Locations
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Wayne County, Michigan
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
Tables
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
Tables for
Section 2: Riverbend Area Site Investigation
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.25
TABLE 2-1 RIVERBEND AREA SITE CHARACTERIZATION COORDINATES AND SAMPLE COLLECTION DATA
DETROIT RIVER AREA OF CONCERN, DETROIT, MICHIGAN (OCTOBER - NOVEMBER 2015)
Location ID
Date Sampled
Time Sampled
(local)3
Target Coordinates
Actual Coordinates (Approximate)
Distance from
Target
Coordinatesb (ft)
Surface Sample Description
Field Notes
Y | X
Y | X
NAD83 State Plane Michigan South (US Survey Feet)
I\im-i ln-iiil \i i-.i
RB15-01
10/30/15
15:15
303119.2759
13478755.93
303114.1238
13478751.65
7
Brown silt with a few pieces of woody organic
debris. Mild sewage odor.
Location moved during coring attempts to try for
more complete recovery.
RB15-02
10/31/15
9:25
302806.1002
13478282.10
302803.4944
13478284.54
4
Brown fine to medium sand, sheen visible, clam
shells up to 8 inches wide to fragments, wood
debris up to 1 inch long.
RB15-03
10/31/15
10:30
302546.1503
13477129.12
302541.7349
13477127.41
5
Very soft brown-gray silt/silty clay. Trace very fine
sand.
RB15-04
10/31/15
12:30
301396.3341
13475062.97
301388.6472
13475051.61
14
Brown sand with riprap, gravel/pebbles, slight
sheen, brick, shell hash. A live crayfish; moving
slowly.
Location moved —13 ft due to riprap and windy
conditions. Local fishermen on pier mentioned
submerged car in vicinity of target location.
RB15-05
10/31/15
14:00
300297.6834
13473657.45
300277.1294
13473669.49
24
Trace silt, whole mussel shells loose,
unconsolidated.
Pivoted outwards from seawall for better recovery.
Mussel shells at the sediment surface extremely
dense, very little fine material. May not be enough
recovery for analytical sample on surface; however,
core recovery was adequate. Mussel shells visible
in top 6 inches of core.
RB15-06
10/31/15
15:00
300112.8224
13473557.50
300121.9898
13473562.32
10
Gray to dark gray silt with fine sand and
unconsolidated whole mussel shells/hash.
RB15-07
11/1/15
12:45
299895.9100
13473269.25
299894.6902
13473247.83
21
Unconsolidated mussel shells with some dark gray
silt and very fine sand. Collected double volume for
analytical sample.
RB15-08
11/1/15
10:35
299802.4140
13472924.45
299724.9505
13472924.87
77
Brown fine to medium sand, small shells —1/2 inch
across
Location moved ~70 ft S due to visible submerged
pilings along seawall in vicinity of target location.
RB15-09
11/1/15
9:30
299640.4805
13472869.60
299650.7507
13472884.62
18
Dark gray sandy silt, sand very fine to fine, and
mussel shells.
Location moved ~20 ft S due to riprap/submerged
pilings along seawall. High clay content in core.
RB15-10
11/1/15
8:15
299607.7387
13472707.26
299535.7009
13472703.94
72
Whole mussels shells with some dark gray silt and
very fine sand. Collected double volume for
analytical sample.
Location moved ~70 ft S of target location due to
pilings/old dolphins visible in water. Target
location appears to be on land.
RB15-11C
11/3/15
11:55
299342.7071
13472441.37
299326.1613
13472438.05
17
Lots of mussel shells with brown sand/silt, some
gravel and some woody organic debris.
John Barkach (GLEC) advised EA that location
should be as close to seawall as possible, and
sample location should match that of aerial map
provided by MDEQ. Location moved 15 ft S and 20
ft E to avoid seawall obstructions. Rex Johnson
(Global Remediation Technologies, Inc.) observed
sample location moves. Extra surface sample
volume collected due to large quantity of mussel
shells.
RB15-12
11/3/15
10:40
299110.5585
13472109.24
299089.6418
13472109.45
21
5 attempts, zero recovery with each one.
Location moved to avoid seawall. Rex Johnson
(Global Remediation Technologies, Inc.) observed
sample location moves. Visible black material with
strong fuel smell at bottom of the core. Sheen
visible. Third coring attempt met refusal after 3.1 ft
due to rock and brick fragments.
RB15-13:
11/2/15
15:10
298777.7199
13471698.84
298768.1725
13471695.17
10
Brown sand silt mixed with some gravel and mussel
shells.
John Barkach (GLEC) advised EA that location
should be as close to seawall as possible, and
sample location should match that of aerial map
provided by MDEQ. Location shifted 9 ft S and 23
ft E to avoid seawall obstructions.
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 3
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.25
TABLE 2-1 RIVERBEND AREA SITE CHARACTERIZATION COORDINATES AND SAMPLE COLLECTION DATA
DETROIT RIVER AREA OF CONCERN, DETROIT, MICHIGAN (OCTOBER - NOVEMBER 2015)
Location ID
Date Sampled
Time Sampled
(local)3
Target Coordinates
Actual Coordinates (Approximate)
Distance from
Target
Coordinatesb (ft)
Surface Sample Description
Field Notes
Y | X
Y | X
NAD83 State Plane Michigan South (US Survey Feet)
RB15-14:
11/2/15
14:20
298726.3685
13471653.64
298709.5326
13471652.25
17
Brown sand silt mixed with some gravel, mussel
shells and fishing line. A few pieces of SAV.
John Barkach (GLEC) advised EA that location
should be as close to seawall as possible, and
sample location should match that of aerial map
provided by MDEQ. Actual location was 16 ft S
and 26 ft E of target.
RB15-15:
11/2/15
13:00
298589.0095
13471537.26
298580.3028
13471534.44
9
Brown sand and silt mixed with lots of mussel
shells. One metal bottle cap.
John Barkach (GLEC) advised EA that location
should be as close to seawall as possible, and
sample location should match that of aerial map
provided by MDEQ. Clay at bottom of core.
RB15-16
11/2/15
11:35
298421.3300
13471392.39
298406.4232
13471393.35
15
Mostly mussel shells with some sand, trash and
woody organic debris.
Location moved —11 ft S. Sheen and brown/black
globs observed. Tar odor evident.
RB15-17
11/2/15
9:05
297799.8530
13470814.87
297738.1345
13470808.93
62
Gray clay, small amount of gravel, and a few mussel
shells.
Location moved 5 ft west and 60 ft S to avoid
concrete seawall obstructions.
RB15-18
11/1/15
15:15
295801.3752
13469465.07
295807.5784
13469470.10
8
Highly variable lithology based on 4 ponar grabs —
gray clay with mussel shells, gray sand (fine to
medium) with pebbles and cobbles, Campbell's
soup can, wood debris.
RB15-19
11/2/15
17:05
294282.1580
13468374.28
294193.7416
13468371.58
88
Brown sand/silt mixed with mussel shells and
gravel.
Location shifted ~75 ft south due to riprap and
wood pilings near target location.
RB15-20
11/4/15
14:15
293669.6243
13467949.03
293665.0127
13467957.89
10
Brown silt. Sheen and fuel odor detected, a few
pieces of woody organic debris.
RB15-21
11/4/15
12:10
293524.8325
13467894.14
293515.2830
13467900.73
12
Sand with some silt, mussel shells and woody
organic debris.
Twelve ponar grabs taken to get sufficient volume
for surface sample. Rockjammedinthe core
catcher.
RB15-22
11/3/15
16:50
292895.1547
13467419.06
292855.5143
13467442.56
46
Brown sand and silt mixed with lots of SAV.
Location moved ~45 ft to try for more complete
recovery in core attempts.
RB15-23
11/3/15
15:05
292383.4085
13467053.94
292321.1254
13467052.43
62
Brown sand and silt with some gravel, organic
woody debris, mussel shells and a few pieces of
SAV.
Location moved ~6 ft W and ~50 ft S to avoid
shoreline rip rap. Location moved an additional 10
ft SE to try for more complete recovery in core
attempts.
RB15-24d
11/4/15
9:20
291306.1658
13466117.17
291288.2774
13466213.38
98
Brown silt with just a few pieces of woody organic
debris.
Target location moved to avoid major pipelines in
the vicinity. Location moved an additional ~60 ft E
and ~80 ft S of revised location due to seawall
obstructions.
RB15-25d
11/4/15
10:30
291113.4885
13466028.34
290944.5181
13465955.96
184
Sand with some silt, mussel shells and woody
organic debris.
Target location moved to avoid major pipelines in
the vicinity. Location moved an additional ~60 ft S
and —10 ft E of revised location due to seawall
obstructions.
RB15-26
11/3/15
8:00
290464.6998
13465685.50
290473.2091
13465681.29
10
Mostly gravel with some brown clay and silt. A
few mussel shells.
Location moved-8 ft S. Ten ponar attempts
produced mostly gravel. Collected sediment that
was recovered, but lots of rocks included in sample.
RB15-27
10/26/15
15:30
289924.1451
13465438.72
289919.4702
13465438.51
5
Sand with gravel and black stone/coal (slag),
mussel shells and one 2-inch stone.
Slight sheen noted from ponar. Did not reach clay
with core, still sandy material at the bottom.
RB15-28
10/26/15
13:45
289554.1278
13465335.49
289556.6609
13465326.50
9
Gray silt with a small amount of sand and a few
gravel size stones.
Location moved ~8 ft W and 2 ft N.
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 2 of 3
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.25
TABLE 2-1 RIVERBEND AREA SITE CHARACTERIZATION COORDINATES AND SAMPLE COLLECTION DATA
DETROIT RIVER AREA OF CONCERN, DETROIT, MICHIGAN (OCTOBER - NOVEMBER 2015)
Location ID
Date Sampled
Time Sampled
(local)3
Target Coordinates
Actual Coordinates (Approximate)
Distance from
Target
Coordinatesb (ft)
Surface Sample Description
Field Notes
Y | X
Y | X
NAD83 State Plane Michigan South (US Survey Feet)
II.I|Imi||iiV\|| \| i-.|
HBT15-A
10/27/15
10:45
306144.9972
13485665.28
306145.8477
13485672.20
7
Gray/brown silt, slight fuel odor.
Encountered refusal at 10 ft. Bottom of core is hard
black clay with fuel odor. PID at bottom of core
was 1.5 ppm.
HBT15-B
10/30/15
10:10
305931.9507
13485652.72
305883.7682
13485643.75
49
Sand and gravel with lots of mussel shells.
Sample location moved ~50 ft offshore to avoid
riprap near shore. Three ponar grabs taken to get
sufficient volume for surface sample. Three
different coring attempts were made at this location
over the course of two days. The core kept for
chemcial analysis was the second core collected,
overall, and the first core collected on 10/30/2015.
HBT15-C
10/30/15
13:05
305815.6799
13485469.06
305772.7285
13485468.52
43
Sand and gravel mix, lots of mussel shells, some
woody organic debris and bits of broken glass.
After consultation with EPA, shifted location ~44 ft
SE of the target location due to rocks and shoreline
riprap.
EPA = U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
ft = Foot (feet)
GLEC = Great Lakes Environmental Center, Inc.
MDEQ = Michigan Department of Environmental Quality
NAD83 = North American Datum of 1983
SAV = Submerged aquatic vegetation
a. All dates 10/31 and earlier have times in Eastern Daylight Time (EDT). All dates 11/1 and later have times in Eastern Standard Time (EST).
b. Distance of actual from proposed location calculated using GIS.
c. The target Riverside Park locations (RB15-11, -13,-14, and -15) were revised by MDEQ and submitted to EPA on 10/23/15, after the draft submittal of the Quality Assurance Project Plan. The coordinates provided in this table are the revised coordinates provided by GLEC.
d. The target locations of RB15-24 andRB15-25 were near two submerged pipelines. EA worked with representatives from Kinder Morgan and Plains All American to move sampling locations away from the pipelines to safe areas. The target locations provided in this table are the
locations provided in the Qualiy Assurance Project Plan.
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 3 of 3
Site Characterization Report
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.25
TABLE 2-2 RIVERBEND AREA SITE CHARACTERIZATION CORE DATA
DETROIT RIVER AREA OF CONCERN, DETROIT, MICHIGAN (OCTOBER - NOVEMBER 2015)
Location ID
Sample
Processing
Date
Processing
Time
(Local)3
Elevation at
Deck of
Barge
NAVD88 (ft)
Depth from
Deck of Barge
to Sediment
Surface
NAVD88 (ft)
Sediment
Surface
Elevation
NAVD88 (ft)
Surface
(Ponar)
Sample
(Y/N)
Sediment Coreb
Penetration
Depth (ft)
Sediment
Recovery (ft)
Percent
Recovery
Collection Method
Collected to
Refusal
(Y/N)
Uiu'rlii'iiri \ir;i
RBI 5-01
11 32015
15:15
579.1
13.60
565.5
Y
9.0
4.6
51
Sonic Coring
Y
RBI 5-02
11/3/2015
8:00
579.3
32.00
547.3
Y
10.0
11.0
110
Sonic Coring
N
RBI 5-03
11/2/2015
14:00
579.4
18.80
560.6
Y
10.0
11.0
110
Sonic Coring
N
RBI 5-04
11/3/2015
9:00
579.3
27.00
552.3
Y
10.0
9.4
94
Sonic Coring
Y
RBI 5-05
11/3/2015
9:45
579.2
24.10
555.1
Y
10.0
9.5
95
Sonic Coring
Y
RBI 5-06
11/3/2015
10:00
579.3
34.70
544.6
Y
10.0
10.5
105
Sonic Coring
Y
RBI 5-07
11/2/2015
8:30
578.2
37.00
541.2
Y
10.0
6.0
60
Sonic Coring
Y
RBI 5-08
11/2/2015
9:50
578.8
27.50
551.3
Y
10.0
9.5
95
Sonic Coring
Y
RBI 5-09
11/2/2015
10:15
578.8
37.40
541.4
Y
10.0
10.9
109
Sonic Coring
Y
RBI 5-10
11/2/2015
10:50
578.6
31.40
547.2
Y
10.0
10.9
109
Sonic Coring
Y
RB15-11
11/4/2015
15:15
578.9
32.30
546.6
Y
10.0
10.5
105
Sonic Coring
Y
RBI 5-12
11/4/2015
14:30
579.2
19.00
560.2
N
10.0
2.2
22
Sonic Coring
Y
RBI 5-13
11/4/2015
11:00
579.1
27.20
551.9
Y
10.0
10.9
109
Sonic Coring
Y
RBI 5-14
11/4/2015
10:20
579.2
27.00
552.2
Y
10.0
10.0
100
Sonic Coring
Y
RB15-15
11/4/2015
9:30
579.0
28.30
550.7
Y
10.0
10.0
100
Sonic Coring
Y
RBI 5-16
11/4/2015
8:30
579.4
29.40
550.0
Y
10.0
00
00
88
Sonic Coring
Y
RBI 5-17
11/3/2015
13:45
579.2
36.80
542.4
Y
10.0
8.6
86
Sonic Coring
Y
RB15-18
11/2/2015
16:15
578.7
35.00
543.7
Y
10.0
7.3
73
Sonic Coring
Y
RBI 5-19
11/3/2015
11:11
578.9
32.00
546.9
Y
10.0
10.5
105
Sonic Coring
Y
RBI 5-20
11/5/2015
8:45
578.9
25.60
553.3
Y
10.0
9.2
92
Sonic Coring
Y
RBI 5-21
11/5/2015
10:00
578.9
26.60
552.3
Y
4.2
2.0
48
Sonic Coring
Y
RBI 5-22
11/4/2015
15:45
579.1
28.60
550.5
Y
5.5
4.8
87
Sonic Coring
Y
RBI 5-23
11/5/2015
10:55
579.0
32.60
546.4
Y
10.0
5.0
50
Sonic Coring
Y
RBI 5-24
11/5/2015
9:15
579.1
31.00
548.1
Y
10.0
11.0
110
Sonic Coring
Y
RBI 5-25
11/5/2015
11:30
578.8
42.60
536.2
Y
10.0
8.2
82
Sonic Coring
Y
RBI 5-26
11/4/2015
13:20
579.1
43.40
535.7
Y
10.0
9.2
92
Sonic Coring
Y
RBI 5-27
10/28/2015
15:00
572.2
38.60
533.6
Y
10.0
7.0
70
Sonic Coring
Y
RBI 5-28
10/28/2015
14:30
579.2
48.30
530.9
Y
10.0
10.0
100
Sonic Coring
Y
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 2
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.25
TABLE 2-2 RIVERBEND AREA SITE CHARACTERIZATION CORE DATA
DETROIT RIVER AREA OF CONCERN, DETROIT, MICHIGAN (OCTOBER - NOVEMBER 2015)
Location ID
Sample
Processing
Date
Processing
Time
(Local)3
Elevation at
Deck of
Barge
NAVD88 (ft)
Depth from
Deck of Barge
to Sediment
Surface
NAVD88 (ft)
Sediment
Surface
Elevation
NAVD88 (ft)
Surface
(Ponar)
Sample
(Y/N)
Sediment Coreb
Penetration
Depth (ft)
Sediment
Recovery (ft)
Percent
Recovery
Collection Method
Collected to
Refusal
(Y/N)
1 liirlmrlimn \ir;i
HBT15-A
10 28 2015
11:00
579.6
15.40
564.2
Y
10.0
10.0
100
Sonic Coring
Y
HBT15-B
10/30/2015
10:10
579.1
24.10
555.0
Y
10.0
6.0
60
Sonic Coring
Y
HBT15-C
11/2/2015
15:15
579.4
27.40
552.0
Y
10.0
8.9
89
Sonic Coring
Y
Note: all samples collected by MATECO.
a. Sample times processed on 10/31 or earlier are in Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) zone. Sample times processed on 11/1 or later are in Eastern Standard Time (EST) zone.
b. Where mutiple coring attempts were made, core specifications are listed for core with the most complete recovery, which was the core that was processed,
ft = Foot (feet).
NAVD88 = North American Vertical Datum of 1988.
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 2 of 2
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.25
TABLE 2-3 RIVERBEND AREA SITE CHARACTERIZATION ACTUAL ANALYTICAL PROGRAM
DETROIT RIVER AREA OF CONCERN, DETROIT, MICHIGAN (OCTOBER - NOVEMBER 2015)
Analytical Group and Method
Analtvical Interval0
Sample Location/
Sample ID
Sample Depth Interval (ft)
34 PAHsa
EPA CLP SOM02.2
Total Michigan
Metals6 + Iron &
Nickel
PCB - Aroclors
EPA CLP SOM02.2
SEM/AVS
EPA-821-R-91 100/
SW846 6010C/7470A
Total Organic Carbon
Lloyd Kahn
Percent Moisture
ASTMD2216
Grain Size
(with hydrometer)
ASTMD422
Ammonia
EPA Method 350.1
DRO/ORO
SW846 8015B
Start of Interval
(inches)
End of Interval
(inches)
Riverbend Area
RB15-01
surf
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
6
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
12
1.0-3.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
12
36
3.0-5.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
36
55
RB15-02
surf
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
6
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
12
1.0-3.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
12
39
3.0-4.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
39
52
RB15-03
surf
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
6
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
12
1.0-3.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
12
36
3.0-5.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
36
59
5.0-7.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
59
84
RB15-04
surf
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
6
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
12
1.0-3.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
12
39
3.0-4.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
39
51
RB15-05
surf
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
6
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
12
1.0-3.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
12
36
RB15-06
surf
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
6
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
12
1.0-3.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
12
36
RB15-07
surf
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
6
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
10
1.0-2.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
10
20
2.0-3.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
20
36
RB15-08
surf
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
6
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
12
RB15-09
surf
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
6
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
9
RB15-10
surf
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
6
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
7
RB15-11
surf
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
6
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
12
1.0-3.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
12
36
RB15-12
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
12
1.0-3.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
12
23
RB15-13
surf
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
6
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
12
1.0-2.5
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
12
29
2.5-3.5
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
29
43
3.5-5.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
43
60
RB15-14
surf
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
6
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
12
1.0-3.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
12
33
3.0-5.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
33
60
RB15-15
surf
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
6
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
12
1.0-2.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
12
26
2.0-4.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
26
51
4.0-6.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
51
72
RB15-16
surf
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
6
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
12
1.0-3.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
12
36
3.0-4.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
36
50
4.0-6.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
50
72
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
1 of 3
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Analytical Group and Method
Analtvical Interval0
Sample Location/
Sample ID
Sample Depth Interval (ft)
34 PAHsa
EPA CLP SOM02.2
Total Michigan
Metals6 + Iron &
Nickel
PCB - Aroclors
EPA CLP SOM02.2
SEM/AVS
EPA-821-R-91 100/
SW846 6010C/7470A
Total Organic Carbon
Lloyd Kahn
Percent Moisture
ASTMD2216
Grain Size
(with hydrometer)
ASTMD422
Ammonia
EPA Method 350.1
DRO/ORO
SW846 8015B
Start of Interval
(inches)
End of Interval
(inches)
RB15-17
surf
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
6
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
12
1.0-3.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
12
36
RB15-18
surf
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
6
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
10
RB15-19
surf
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
6
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
10
1.0-3.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
10
36
RB15-20
surf
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
6
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
12
1.0-2.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
12
22
2.0-4.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
22
50
RB15-21
surf
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
6
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
12
1.0-2.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
12
24
RB15-22
surf
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
6
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
12
1.0-2.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
12
24
2.0-3.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
24
39
3.0-5.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
39
58
RB15-23
surf
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
6
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
12
1.0-3.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
12
36
3.0-5.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
36
60
RB15-24
surf
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
6
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
12
1.0-2.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
12
24
2.0-4.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
24
46
4.0-5.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
46
59
5.0-6.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
59
68
6.0-8.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
68
96
RB15-25
surf
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
6
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
12
RB15-26
surf
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
6
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
12
1.0-3.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
12
36
3.0-5.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
36
60
RB15-27
surf
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
6
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
12
1.0-3.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
12
36
3.0-5.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
36
60
5.0-6.5
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
60
75
6.5-7.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
75
84
RB15-28
surf
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
6
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
12
1.0-3.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
12
36
Harbortown Area
HBT15-A
surf
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
6
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
12
1.0-3.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
12
33
3.0-5.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
33
60
5.0-7.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
60
84
7.0-10.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
84
120
HBT15-B
surf
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
6
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
12
1.0-3.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
12
39
3.0-5.5
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
39
65
5.5-6.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
65
70
HBT15-C
surf
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
6
0.0-1.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
13
1.0-3.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
13
36
3.0-4.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
36
51
4.0-5.0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
51
60
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
2 of 3
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and Its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Analytical Group and Method
Analtyical Interval0
Sample Location/
Sample ID
Sample Depth Interval (ft)
34 PAHsa
EPA CLP SOM02.2
Total Michigan
Metalsb + Iron &
Nickel
PCB - Aroclors
EPA CLP SOM02.2
SEM/AVS
EPA-821-R-91 100/
SW846 6010C/7470A
Total Organic Carbon
Lloyd Kahn
Percent Moisture
ASTMD2216
Grain Size
(with hydrometer)
ASTMD422
Ammonia
EPA Method 350.1
DRO/ORO
SW846 8015B
Start of Interval
(inches)
End of Interval
(inches)
Total Sediment Samples
119
119
119
30
119
119
30
30
30
Field Quality Control Samples
Field Duplicated (10% of samples)
11
11
11
3
11
11
3
3
3
MS/MSDe (5% of samples and field duplicates)
6
6
6
6
6
0
0
2
2
Total Samples
136
136
136
39
136
130
33
35
35
a. 34 PAHs include: acenapntnene; acenapntnylene; anthracene; lluorine; naphthalene; 2-methylnapthalene; phenanthrene; benzo(a)anthracene; benzo(a)pyrene; benzo(e)pyrene; benzo(b)tluoranthene;
benzo(g,h,i)peiylene; benzo(k)fluoranthene; chrysene; dibenz(a,h)anthracene; fluoranthene; indeno(l,2,3-c,d)pyrene; pyrene; CI naphthalenes; C2 naphthalenes; C3 naphthalenes; CI fluorenes; C4
naphthalenes; CI phenanthrenes; C2 fluorenes; C2 phenanthrenes; C3 fluorenes; CI fluoranthenes; C3 phenanthrenes; C4 phenanthrenes; CI chrysenes; perylene; C2 chrysenes; C3 chiysenes; and C4
b. Total Michigan Metals includes the following analytes: arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury, selenium, silver, and zinc.
c. Analytical intervals were modified in the field based on consultation with EPA. They were defined by visible lithological changes in the core.
d. Field duplicate taken at sample intervals marked yellow.
e. Volume collected for matrix spike/matrix spike duplicates from the sample intervals and marked green.
AVS = Acid volatile sulfide
DRO = Diesel range organic
EPA = U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
MS = Matrix spike
MSD = Matrix spike duplicate
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl
ORO = Oil range organic
SEM = Simultaneously extracted metal
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
3 of 3
Site Characterization Report
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
Tables for
Section 3: Results
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.25
TABLE 3-1 SUMMARY OF EXCEEDANCES
Analyte
Total Number of
Submitted
Samples
Total Number of
Submitted
Samples (Without
IDs)
Total Number of
Detects (Without
IDs)
TEC
PEC
SEM/AVS
Ratio > 1
TEC
Exceedance
PEC
Exceedance
Units
Percentage of
Samples that
Exceeded TEC
Percentage of
Samples That
Exceeded PEC
Percentage of
Samples That
Exceed SEM/AVS
Ratio of 1
SEM/AVS
SEM/AVS Ratio
30
27
16
NA
NA
1
NA
NA
none
NA
NA
3.7
PAHs
Total PAH17 ND=1/2RL
112
103
103
1,610
22,800
NA
90
64
Hg/kg
87.4
62.1
NA
PCB Aroclors
Total PCBs ND=0
112
103
103
59.8
676
NA
66
18
Hg/kg
64.1
17.5
NA
Metals
Arsenic
112
103
103
9.79
33
NA
34
1
mg/kg
33.0
1.0
NA
Barium
112
103
103
NSL
NSL
NA
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
NSL
NSL
NA
Cadmium
112
103
101
0.99
4.98
NA
40
19
mg/kg
38.8
18.4
NA
Chromium
112
103
103
43.4
111
NA
38
19
mg/kg
36.9
18.4
NA
Copper
112
103
103
31.6
149
NA
69
36
mg/kg
67.0
35.0
NA
Iron
112
103
103
20000*
40000*
NA
38
1
mg/kg
36.9
1.0
NA
Lead
112
103
103
35.8
128
NA
72
48
mg/kg
69.9
46.6
NA
Mercury
112
103
83
0.18
1.06
NA
60
30
mg/kg
58.3
29.1
NA
Nickel
112
103
103
22.7
48.6
NA
63
20
mg/kg
61.2
19.4
NA
Selenium
112
103
84
NSL
NSL
NA
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
NSL
NSL
NA
Silver
112
103
79
1.6(a)
2.2(a)
NA
25
23
mg/kg
24.3
22.3
NA
Zinc
112
103
103
121
459
NA
61
32
mg/kg
59.2
31.1
NA
Notes:
AVS = Acid volatile sulfides
Hg/kg = micrograms per kilogram
FD = Field Duplicate
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
NA = Not Applicable
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000)
RL= reporting limit
SEM = Simultaneously extracted metals
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000)
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003
TEC and PEC values based on Guidelines for the Protection and Management of Aquatic Sediments in Ontario (Persaud et al. 1993)
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 1
Site Characterization Report
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-2 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR GRAIN SIZE
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-01
RB15-02
RB15-02
RB15-03
RB15-04
RB15-05
RB15-06
RB15-07
Sample Name:
RB15-01-SURF
RB15-02-SURF
RB15-02-SURFFD
RB15-03-SURF
RB15-04-SURF
RB15-05-SURF
RB15-06-SURF
RB15-07-SURF
Sample Date:
10/30/2015
10/31/2015
10/31/2015
10/31/2015
10/31/2015
10/31/2015
10/31/2015
11/1/2015
Depth Interval (feet):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
Gravel
%
0.3
8.8
20.8
1.2
16.6
58.8
40.8
51.8
Coarse Sand
0/
/o
0.4
2.7
2.5
3.2
10.8
8.9
7.6
9.5
Medium Sand
0/
/o
1.3
3.8
3.4
14.4
29.7
4.3
3.8
12.2
Fine Sand
0/
/o
18.8
81.3
68.7
23.9
36.9
7.6
36.9
19.5
Sand
0/
/o
20.5
87.8
74.6
41.5
77.4
20.8
48.3
41.2
Silt
0/
/o
49.6
2.1
3.3
33.0
4.7
18.9
9.0
5.1
Clay
0/
/o
29.6
1.2
1.3
24.3
1.3
1.5
1.9
1.8
Silt + Clay
0/
/o
79.2
3.3
4.6
57.3
6.0
20.4
10.9
6.9
Hydrometer and Sieve Analysis
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
85.4
100
95.8
82.3
100
85.7
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
85.4
100
95.8
82.3
100
82.3
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
95.4
82.8
100
90.1
63.5
84.7
66
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
% passed
99.7
91.2
79.2
98.8
83.4
41.2
59.2
48.2
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
% passed
99.3
88.5
76.7
95.6
72.6
32.3
51.6
38.7
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
% passed
98.7
87.3
75.6
88.4
58.8
29.6
49.8
32.8
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
% passed
98
84.7
73.3
81.2
42.9
28
47.8
26.5
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
% passed
96.5
71.8
61.6
72.8
23.8
25.2
41.9
19
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
% passed
95.4
44.8
37.8
68.2
15.2
22.8
31.9
14.5
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
% passed
94.1
26.5
23.1
65.6
11.4
21.8
23.3
12
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
% passed
79.2
3.4
4.6
57.3
6
20.4
10.9
7
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
% passed
49.6
2.1
2.1
45.3
3
5.1
7.7
4.5
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
% passed
45.6
1.7
1.7
40.5
2.5
4.1
6.8
3.9
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
% passed
39
1.7
1.7
32.9
2.1
2
3.9
3
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
% passed
35
1.2
1.3
26.8
1.7
1.5
2.4
2.4
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
% passed
29.6
1.2
1.3
24.3
1.3
1.5
1.9
1.8
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
% passed
21.6
0.5
0.5
17.3
1
0.6
1.6
1
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
% passed
15
0.4
0.4
11
0.4
0.6
1.1
0.9
Notes:
% = percent passed
FD = Field Duplicate
RB= Riverbend Area
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 4
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-2 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR GRAIN SIZE
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (feet):
RB15-08
RB15-08
RB15-09
RB15-09
RB15-10
RB15-11
RB15-13
RB15-14
RB15-08-SURF
RB15-08-SURFFD
RB15-09-SURF
RB15-09-SURFFD
RB15-10-SURF
RB15-11-SURF
RB15-13-SURF
RB15-14-SURF
11/1/2015
11/1/2015
11/1/2015
11/1/2015
11/1/2015
11/3/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
Gravel
%
9.8
8.3
22.4
31.4
54
56.7
16.1
20.3
Coarse Sand
0/
/o
7.2
8.4
11.4
10.3
11.6
6.8
12
9
Medium Sand
0/
/o
17
16.5
10.5
7.8
6.7
5
15.4
10.1
Fine Sand
0/
/o
61.9
62.6
36.9
32.6
14.7
12.5
47.8
50.1
Sand
0/
/o
86.1
87.5
58.8
50.7
33
24.3
75.2
69.2
Silt
0/
/o
2.7
2.8
13.7
12.8
12.5
10.2
6.5
6.9
Clay
0/
/o
1.4
1.4
5.1
5.1
0.5
8.8
2.2
3.6
Silt + Clay
0/
/o
4.1
4.2
18.8
17.9
13.0
19.0
8.7
10.5
Hydrometer and Sieve Analysis
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
70.2
100
100
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
96.7
98.8
90.9
81.7
68.5
63
94
89.9
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
% passed
90.2
91.7
77.6
68.6
46
43.3
83.9
79.7
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
% passed
83
83.3
66.2
58.3
34.4
36.5
71.9
70.7
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
% passed
76
76.5
61.5
55.1
30.2
34.4
65.3
67.3
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
% passed
66
66.8
55.7
50.5
27.7
31.5
56.5
60.6
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
% passed
47
49
47.8
43.9
23.5
27.8
43.4
49.5
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
% passed
27.9
30
39.1
36.5
19.5
25.1
31.2
37
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
% passed
16.9
17.5
32.8
30.6
16.9
23.4
23
27.3
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
% passed
4.1
4.2
18.8
17.9
13
19
8.8
10.5
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
% passed
3.2
2.6
13.9
15.7
5.3
18.1
4.8
11.1
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
% passed
2.7
2.6
11.4
12.9
4.5
15.2
4.3
5.8
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
% passed
2.3
1.8
8.9
9.3
2.3
13.1
3.9
4.9
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
% passed
1.8
1.4
7
6.5
1
10.9
3.1
4.1
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
% passed
1.4
1.4
5.1
5.1
0.5
8.8
2.2
3.6
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
% passed
1.4
0.9
3.3
3
0.5
6.6
1.4
2.3
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
% passed
1
0.5
2
2.3
0.5
4.5
1.6
2.1
Notes:
% = percent passed
FD = Field Duplicate
RB= Riverbend Area
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 2 of 4
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-2 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR GRAIN SIZE
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (feet):
RB15-15
RB15-16
RB15-17
RB15-18
RB15-19
RB15-20
RB15-21
RB15-22
RB15-15-SURF
RB15-16-SURF
RB15-17-SURF
RB15-18-SURF
RB15-19-SURF
RB15-20-SURF
RB15-21-SURF
RB15-22-SURF
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/1/2015
11/2/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/3/2015
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
Gravel
%
31.3
48.8
4.7
44.1
54.3
4.5
10.4
25.1
Coarse Sand
0/
/o
8.2
11.1
7.2
9.5
6.7
3.3
7.8
4.5
Medium Sand
0/
/o
5.9
4.5
5.9
10
8.3
4.9
7.8
7.1
Fine Sand
0/
/o
39.8
25.1
7.7
16.5
27.1
18.1
66.1
34.3
Sand
0/
/o
53.9
40.7
20.8
36
42.1
26.3
81.7
45.9
Silt
0/
/o
10.4
8.6
33.2
10.0
1.9
43.9
4.9
20.6
Clay
0/
/o
4.4
1.9
41.3
9.9
1.7
25.3
3.0
8.4
Silt + Clay
0/
/o
14.8
10.5
74.5
19.9
3.6
69.2
7.9
29.0
Hydrometer and Sieve Analysis
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
82.9
86.8
100
100
100
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
92.7
71.1
100
68.5
61.5
100
97.9
84.2
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
% passed
68.7
51.2
95.3
55.9
45.7
95.5
89.6
74.9
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
% passed
60.5
40.1
88.1
46.4
39
92.2
81.8
70.4
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
% passed
58.2
38.4
84.6
41.1
37
89.3
78.1
67.9
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
% passed
54.6
35.6
82.2
36.4
30.7
87.3
74
63.3
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
% passed
45.2
29.4
80
27.2
13.4
84.9
57.1
53
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
% passed
34.1
22.7
78.6
22.3
7.6
82.1
31.7
45.4
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
% passed
27.5
18.1
77.7
20.5
5.8
79.6
19
40.3
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
% passed
14.8
10.5
74.5
19.9
3.6
69.2
7.9
29
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
% passed
9.1
9.1
56.6
15.4
3.5
46.4
5.8
18.8
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
% passed
8.2
7.9
53.4
14.1
3.2
40.2
4.9
15.8
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
% passed
6.3
5.5
48.6
12.8
2.6
32.7
4.4
13.6
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
% passed
5.3
3.7
44.5
11.5
2
29
3.9
10.6
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
% passed
4.4
1.9
41.3
9.9
1.7
25.3
3
8.4
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
% passed
3
0.7
34.1
7.6
1.3
19
2.5
6.1
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
% passed
2.7
1
26
5.6
0.4
11.5
1.5
3.9
Notes:
% = percent passed
FD = Field Duplicate
RB= Riverbend Area
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 3 of 4
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-2 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR GRAIN SIZE
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (feet):
RB15-23
RB15-24
RB15-25
RB15-26
RB15-27
RB15-28
RB15-23-SURF
RB15-24-SURF
RB15-25-SURF
RB15-26-SURF
RB15-27-SURF
RB15-28-SURF
11/3/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/3/2015
10/26/2015
10/26/2015
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
Gravel
%
37.4
0.3
1.3
77.1
20.1
10.5
Coarse Sand
0/
/o
18.2
0.9
0.3
5
17.5
6.7
Medium Sand
0/
/o
15.3
0.7
1.5
0.8
14.9
6.8
Fine Sand
0/
/o
18.5
6.9
93.2
3.8
42.1
17.2
Sand
0/
/o
52
8.5
95
9.6
74.5
30.7
Silt
0/
/o
7.0
52.2
3.7
11.6
3.6
36.4
Clay
0/
/o
3.6
39.0
0.1
1.7
1.8
22.4
Silt + Clay
0/
/o
10.6
91.2
3.8
13.3
5.4
58.8
Hydrometer and Sieve Analysis
Sieve Size 3 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 2 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 1.5 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 1 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
100
100
100
100
100
100
Sieve Size 0.75 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
92.3
100
100
73.1
100
100
Sieve Size 0.375 inch - Percent Finer
% passed
85.5
100
100
35.2
91.3
100
Sieve Size #4 - Percent Finer
% passed
62.6
99.7
98.7
22.9
79.9
89.5
Sieve Size #10 - Percent Finer
% passed
44.4
98.8
98.4
17.9
62.4
82.8
Sieve Size #20 - Percent Finer
% passed
37.1
98.5
98.2
17.3
54.6
79.5
Sieve Size #40 - Percent Finer
% passed
29.1
98.1
96.9
17.1
47.5
76
Sieve Size #60 - Percent Finer
% passed
19.8
97.4
85.9
16.8
35.6
71.8
Sieve Size #80 - Percent Finer
% passed
15.6
96.6
58.5
16.4
21.6
67.4
Sieve Size #100 - Percent Finer
% passed
13.8
95.7
37.4
16.1
14
64.6
Sieve Size #200 - Percent Finer
% passed
10.6
91.2
3.8
13.3
5.4
58.8
Hydrometer Reading 1 - Percent Finer
% passed
7.5
65.2
0.5
5.5
3.5
56.8
Hydrometer Reading 2 - Percent Finer
% passed
6.7
58.9
0.5
4.1
3
43.2
Hydrometer Reading 3 - Percent Finer
% passed
5.4
50.2
0.5
3.2
2.6
35.9
Hydrometer Reading 4 - Percent Finer
% passed
4
44
0.1
2.2
1.8
27.6
Hydrometer Reading 5 - Percent Finer
% passed
3.6
39
0.1
1.7
1.8
22.4
Hydrometer Reading 6 - Percent Finer
% passed
2.3
27.7
0.1
1.3
1.3
15.9
Hydrometer Reading 7 - Percent Finer
% passed
1.4
19
-0.3
0.8
0.9
10.7
Notes:
% = percent passed
FD = Field Duplicate
RB= Riverbend Area
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 4 of 4
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-3 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR AMMONIA
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-01
RB15-02
RB15-02
RB15-03
RB15-04
RB15-05
Sample Name:
RB15-01-SURF
RB15-02-SURF
RB15-02-SURFFD
RB15-03-SURF
RB15-04-SURF
RB15-05-SURF
Sample Date:
10/30/2015
10/31/2015
10/31/2015
10/31/2015
10/31/2015
10/31/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
Ammonia
mg/kg
211
7.5 U
7.3 U
198
7.6 U
112
NOTES:
FD = Field duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
mg/kg = milligram per kilogram
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 5
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-3 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR AMMONIA
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-06
RB15-07
RB15-08
RB15-08
RB15-09
RB15-09
Sample Name:
RB15-06-SURF
RB15-07-SURF
RB15-08-SURF
RB15-08-SURFFD
RB15-09-SURF
RB15-09-SURFFD
Sample Date:
10/31/2015
11/1/2015
11/1/2015
11/1/2015
11/1/2015
11/1/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
Ammonia
mg/kg
49.6
12.8
7.1
8.8
128
169
NOTES:
FD = Field duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
mg/kg = milligram per kilogram
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 2 of 5
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-3 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR AMMONIA
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-10
RB15-11
RB15-13
RB15-14
RB15-15
RB15-16
Sample Name:
RB15-10-SURF
RB15-11-SURF
RB15-13-SURF
RB15-14-SURF
RB15-15-SURF
RB15-16-SURF
Sample Date:
11/1/2015
11/3/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
Ammonia
mg/kg
191
70.7
5.8 I
23.8
12.1
222
NOTES:
FD = Field duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
mg/kg = milligram per kilogram
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 3 of 5
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-3 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR AMMONIA
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-17
RB15-18
RB15-19
RB15-20
RB15-21
RB 15-22
RB15-23
Sample Name:
RB15-17-SURF
RB15-18-SURF
RB15-19-SURF
RB15-20-SURF
RB15-21-SURF
RB15-22-SURF
RB15-23-SURF
Sample Date:
11/2/2015
11/1/2015
11/2/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/3/2015
11/3/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
Ammonia
mg/kg
6.6 U
5.9 U
6.41
197
7.9 U
27.2
14.3
NOTES:
FD = Field duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
mg/kg = milligram per kilogram
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 4 of 5
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-3 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR AMMONIA
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-24
RB15-25
RB15-26
RB15-27
RB15-28
Sample Name:
RB15-24-SURF
RB15-25-SURF
RB15-26-SURF
RB15-27-SURF
RB15-28-SURF
Sample Date:
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/3/2015
10/26/2015
10/26/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
Ammonia
mg/kg
297
5.1 I
5.8 U
4.71
35.3
NOTES:
FD = Field duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
mg/kg = milligram per kilogram
J = compound was detected, but result is below the reporting limit and
greater than or equal to the method detection limit (value is estimated).
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 5 of 5
Site Characterization Report
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-01
RB15-01
RB15-01
RB15-01
RB15-02
RB15-02
RB15-02
Sample Name:
RB15-01-SURF
RB15-01-0010
RB15-01-1030
RB15-01-3050
RB15-02-SURF
RB15-02-SURFFD
RB15-02-0010
Sample Date:
10/30/2015
11/3/2015
11/3/2015
11/3/2015
10/31/2015
10/31/2015
11/3/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-1
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
76 U
69 U
70 U
64 U
47 U
47 U
44 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
76 U
69 U
70 U
64 U
47 U
47 U
44 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
76 U
69 U
70 U
64 U
47 U
47 U
44 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
22 J
85 J
200
340
69
120
590
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
76 U
69 U
70 U
64 U
47 U
47 U
44 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
76 U
500
1900
5300
47 U
47 U
1200
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
190
420
1400
4300
610
430
770
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
76 U
69 U
70 U
64 U
47 U
47 U
44 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
76 U
69 U
70 U
64 U
47 U
47 U
44 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
ug/kg
212
1005
3500
9940
679
550
2560
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value
liolded iind Shiided delected \allies c\o.vd M X' mjivciiiiiu \aluc
FD = Field Duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
ug/kg = microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
J = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.
J + = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
J - = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
U = The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported
sample quantitation limit.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 16
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (ft):
RB15-02
RB15-02
RB15-03
RB15-03
RB15-03
RB15-03
RB15-03
RB15-04
RB15-02-1030
RB15-02-3040
RB15-03-SURF
RB15-03-0010
RB15-03-1030
RB15-03-3050
RB15-03-5070
RB15-04-SURF
11/3/2015
11/3/2015
10/31/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
10/31/2015
1-3
3-4
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-5
5-7
0-0.5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
53 UJ
41 U
78 U
60 U
64 U
58 U
41 U
50 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
53 UJ
41 U
78 U
60 U
64 U
58 U
41 U
50 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
53 UJ
41 U
78 U
60 U
64 U
58 U
41 U
50 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
53 UJ
41 U
27 J
50 J
40 J
58 U
41 U
18 J
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
53 UJ
41 U
78 U
60 U
64 U
58 U
41 U
50 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
32 J-
41 U
78 U
60 U
74
58 U
41 U
50 U
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
26 J-
41 U
110 J
340
52 J
58 U
41 U
79
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
53 UJ
41 U
78 U
60 U
64 U
58 U
41 U
50 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
53 UJ
41 U
78 U
60 U
64 U
58 U
41 U
50 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
ug/kg
58
0
137
390
166
0
0
97
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value
linlded iind Shiided delected \alucs e\ceal H\C sciv.viiiiiu \aluc
FD = Field Duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
ug/kg = microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
J = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.
J + = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
J - = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
U = The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported
sample quantitation limit.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 2 of 16
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (ft):
RB15-04
RB15-04
RB15-04
RB15-04
RB15-05
RB15-05
RB15-05
RB15-04-0010
RB15-04-1030
RB15-04-1030FD
RB 15-04-3040
RB15-05-SURF
RB15-05-0010
RB15-05-1030
11/3/2015
11/3/2015
11/3/2015
11/3/2015
10/31/2015
11/3/2015
11/3/2015
0-1
1-3
1-3
3-4
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
49 UJ
43 U
41 U
40 U
53 U
41 U
40 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
49 UJ
43 U
41 U
40 U
53 U
41 U
40 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
49 UJ
43 U
41 U
40 U
53 U
41 U
40 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
170 J
43 U
41 U
40 U
25 J
96
6.7 J
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
49 UJ
43 U
41 U
40 U
53 U
41 U
40 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
410 J
43 U
41 U
40 U
53 U
78
5.4 J
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
160 J-
43 U
41 U
40 U
33 J
38 J
3 J
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
49 UJ
43 U
41 U
40 U
53 U
41 U
40 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
49 UJ
43 U
41 U
40 U
53 U
41 U
40 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
ug/kg
740
0
0
0
58
212
15.1
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value
linlded iind Shiided delected \alucs e\ceal H\C sciv.viiiiiu \aluc
FD = Field Duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
ug/kg = microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
J = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.
J + = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
J - = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
U = The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported
sample quantitation limit.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 3 of 16
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (ft):
RB15-06
RB15-06
RB15-06
RB15-07
RB15-07
RB15-07
RB15-07
RB15-06-SURF
RB15-06-0010
RB15-06-1030
RB15-07-SURF
RB15-07-0010
RB15-07-1020
RB 15-07-2030
10/31/2015
11/3/2015
11/3/2015
11/1/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
0-1
1-2
2-3
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
47 U
45 U
46 U
51 U
43 U
44 U
44 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
47 U
45 U
46 U
51 U
43 U
44 U
44 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
47 U
45 U
46 U
51 U
43 U
44 U
44 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
34 J
45 U
46 U
19 J
48
310
8.5 J
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
47 U
45 U
46 U
51 U
43 U
44 U
44 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
47 U
38 J
46 U
51 U
120
400
17 J
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
290
27 J
46 U
48 J
72
150
8.1 J
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
47 U
45 U
46 U
51 U
43 U
44 U
44 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
47 U
45 U
46 U
51 U
43 U
44 U
44 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
ug/kg
324
65
0
67
240
860
33.6
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value
linlded iind Shiided delected \alucs e\ceal H\C sciv.viiiiiu \aluc
FD = Field Duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
ug/kg = microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
J = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.
J + = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
J - = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
U = The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported
sample quantitation limit.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 4 of 16
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-08
RB15-08
RB15-08
RB15-09
RB15-09
RB15-09
RB15-10
Sample Name:
RB15-08-SURF
RB15-08-SURFFD
RB15-08-0010
RB15-09-SURF
RB15-09-SURFFD
RB15-09-0010
RB15-10-SURF
Sample Date:
11/1/2015
11/1/2015
11/2/2015
11/1/2015
11/1/2015
11/2/2015
11/1/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-1
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-1
0-0.5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
46 U
43 U
45 U
74 U
56 U
40 U
44 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
46 U
43 U
45 U
74 U
56 U
40 U
44 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
46 U
43 U
45 U
74 U
56 U
40 U
44 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
37 J
27 J
20 J
76
63 J
130
34 J
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
46 U
43 U
45 U
74 U
56 U
40 U
44 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
46 U
43 U
45 U
74 U
56 U
40 U
44 U
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
500
380
240
780
1500
510
410
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
46 U
43 U
45 U
74 U
56 U
40 U
44 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
46 U
43 U
45 U
74 U
56 U
40 U
44 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
ug/kg
537
407
260
856
1563
640
444
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value
linlded iind Shiided delected \alucs e\ceal H\C sciv.viiiiiu \aluc
FL) = Field Duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
ug/kg = microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
J = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.
J + = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
J - = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
U = The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported
sample quantitation limit.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 5 of 16
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (ft):
RB15-10
RB15-11
RB15-11
RB15-11
RB15-11
RB15-12
RB15-12
RB15-10-0010
RB15-11-SURF
RB15-11-0010
RB15-11-1030
RB15-11-1030FD
RB15-12-0010
RB15-12-1030
11/2/2015
11/3/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
0-1
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
1-3
0-1
1-3
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
44 U
64 U
48 U
45 U
50 U
42 U
270 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
44 U
64 U
48 U
45 U
50 U
42 U
270 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
44 U
64 U
48 U
45 U
50 U
42 U
270 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
15 J
64 U
12 J
45 U
50 U
99 J+
670 J+
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
44 U
64 U
48 U
45 U
50 U
42 U
270 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
44 U
98
22 J
45 U
50 U
260 J
300 J
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
80
110
22 J
45 U
50 U
82 J+
160 J
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
44 U
64 U
48 U
45 U
50 U
42 U
270 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
44 U
64 U
48 U
45 U
50 U
42 U
270 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
ug/kg
95
208
56
0
0
441
1130
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value
linlded iind Shiided delected \alucs e\ceal H\C sciv.viiiiiu \aluc
FD = Field Duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
ug/kg = microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
J = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.
J + = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
J - = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
U = The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported
sample quantitation limit.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 6 of 16
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (ft):
RB15-13
RB15-13
RB15-13
RB15-13
RB15-13
RB15-14
RB15-14
RB15-14
RB15-13-SURF
RB15-13-0010
RB15-13-1025
RB15-13-2535
RB15-13-3550
RB15-14-SURF
RB15-14-0010
RB15-14-1030
11/2/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/2/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
0-0.5
0-1
1-2.5
2.5-3.5
3.5-5
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
52 U
42 U
48 U
53 U
43 U
49 U
44 U
49 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
52 U
42 U
48 U
53 U
43 U
49 U
44 U
49 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
52 U
42 U
48 U
53 U
43 U
49 U
44 U
49 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
170
820 J
1500
240 J
43 U
220
140 J
21 J
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
52 U
42 U
48 U
53 U
43 U
49 U
44 U
49 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
720
1500 J
2100
490 J
43 U
590
270
30 J
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
180
340
470
190
43 U
160
110
16 J
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
52 U
42 U
48 U
53 U
43 U
49 U
44 U
49 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
52 U
42 U
48 U
53 U
43 U
49 U
44 U
49 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
ug/kg
1070
2660
4070
920
0
970
520
67
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value
linlded iind Shiided delected \alucs e\ceal H\C sciv.viiiiiu \aluc
FD = Field Duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
ug/kg = microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
J = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.
J + = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
J - = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
U = The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported
sample quantitation limit.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 7 of 16
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (ft):
RB15-14
RB15-15
RB15-15
RB15-15
RB15-15
RB15-15
RB15-15
RB15-14-3050
RB15-15-SURF
RB15-15-0010
RB15-15-1020
RB15-15-2040
RB15-15-2040FD
RB15-15-4060
11/4/2015
11/2/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
3-5
0-0.5
0-1
1-2
2-4
2-4
4-6
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
42 U
50 U
47 U
39 U
45 U
42 U
41 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
42 U
50 U
47 U
39 U
45 U
42 U
41 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
42 U
50 U
47 U
39 U
45 U
42 U
41 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
42 U
75
180
13 J
24 J
23 J
41 U
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
42 U
50 U
47 U
39 U
45 U
42 U
41 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
42 U
190
200
13 J
13 J
18 J
41 U
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
42 U
91 J
85
5.9 J
9.6 J
10 J
41 U
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
42 U
50 U
47 U
39 U
45 U
42 U
41 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
42 U
50 U
47 U
39 U
45 U
42 U
41 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
ug/kg
0
356
465
31.9
46.6
51
0
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value
linlded iind Shiided delected \alucs e\ceal H\C sciv.viiiiiu \aluc
FD = Field Duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
ug/kg = microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
J = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.
J + = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
J - = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
U = The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported
sample quantitation limit.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 8 of 16
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-16
RB15-16
RB15-16
RB15-16
RB15-16
RB15-17
RB15-17
RB15-17
Sample Name:
RB15-16-SURF
RB15-16-0010
RB15-16-1030
RB15-16-3040
RB15-16-4060
RB15-17-SURF
RB15-17-0010
RB15-17-1030
Sample Date:
11/2/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/2/2015
11/3/2015
11/3/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-4
4-6
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
55 U
42 U
49 U
49 U
44 U
44 U
39 U
40 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
55 U
42 U
49 U
49 U
44 U
44 U
39 U
40 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
55 U
42 U
49 U
49 U
44 U
44 U
39 U
40 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
43 J
90 J
43 J
35 J
44 U
44 U
39 U
40 U
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
55 U
42 U
49 U
49 U
44 U
44 U
39 U
40 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
130
160
55 J
37 J
44 U
8.8 J
9.9 J
40 U
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
63
70
20 J
20 J
44 U
9.3 J
7 J
40 U
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
55 U
42 U
49 U
49 U
44 U
44 U
39 U
40 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
55 U
42 U
49 U
49 U
44 U
44 U
39 U
40 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
ug/kg
236
320
118
92
0
18.1
16.9
0
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value
linlded iind Shiided delected \alucs e\ceal H\C sciv.viiiiiu \aluc
FD = Field Duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
ug/kg = microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
J = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.
J + = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
J - = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
U = The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported
sample quantitation limit.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 9 of 16
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-18
RB15-18
RB15-19
RB15-19
RB15-19
RB15-20
RB15-20
Sample Name:
RB15-18-SURF
RB15-18-0010
RB15-19-SURF
RB15-19-0010
RB15-19-1030
RB15-20-SURF
RB15-20-0010
Sample Date:
11/1/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/3/2015
11/3/2015
11/4/2015
11/5/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
0-1
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
40 U
37 U
47 U
43 U
39 U
86 U
66 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
40 U
37 U
47 U
43 U
39 U
86 U
66 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
40 U
37 U
47 U
43 U
39 U
86 U
66 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
12 J
25 J
110
670
12 J
100 J
86
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
40 U
37 U
47 U
43 U
39 U
86 U
66 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
40 U
170
360
380
5 .2 J
250
280
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
18 J
150
410
290
39 U
180
220 J
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
40 U
37 U
47 U
43 U
39 U
86 U
66 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
40 U
37 U
47 U
43 U
39 U
86 U
66 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
ug/kg
30
345
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-20
RB15-20
RB15-21
RB15-21
RB15-21
RB 15-22
RB15-22
RB 15-22
Sample Name:
RB15-20-1020
RB15-20-2040
RB15-21-SURF
RB15-21-0010
RB15-21-1020
RB15-22-SURF
RB15-22-0010
RB15-22-1020
Sample Date:
11/5/2015
11/5/2015
11/4/2015
11/5/2015
11/5/2015
11/3/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
1-2
2-4
0-0.5
0-1
1-2
0-0.5
0-1
1-2
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
60 U
45 U
52 U
41 U
41 U
77 U
42 U
43 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
60 U
45 U
52 U
41 U
41 U
77 U
42 U
43 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
60 U
45 U
52 U
41 U
41 U
77 U
42 U
43 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
170 J+
6 J
78 J
57 J
15 J
60 J
290 J
68
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
60 U
45 U
52 U
41 U
41 U
77 U
42 U
43 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
210 J+
5.7 J
170
140
40 J
250
470
140
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
150 J
4.1 J
160
130
32 J
240
290
64
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
60 U
45 U
52 U
41 U
41 U
77 U
42 U
43 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
60 U
45 U
52 U
41 U
41 U
77 U
42 U
43 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
ug/kg
530
15.8
408
327
87
550
1050
272
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value
linlded iind Shiided delected \alucs e\ceal H\C sciv.viiiiiu \aluc
FD = Field Duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
ug/kg = microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
J = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.
J + = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
J - = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
U = The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported
sample quantitation limit.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 11 of 16
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-22
RB 15-22
RB15-23
RB15-23
RB15-23
RB15-23
RB15-23
Sample Name:
RB 15-22-2030
RB15-22-3050
RB15-23-SURF
RB15-23-0010
RB15-23-1030
RB15-23-1030FD
RB15-23-3050
Sample Date:
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/3/2015
11/5/2015
11/5/2015
11/5/2015
11/5/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
2-3
3-5
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
1-3
3-5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
26 UJ
52 U
53 U
49 U
59 U
58 U
59 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
26 UJ
52 U
53 U
49 U
59 U
58 U
59 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
26 UJ
52 U
53 U
49 U
59 U
58 U
59 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
18 J-
27 J
43 J
48 J
52 J
33 J
41 J
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
26 UJ
52 U
53 U
49 U
59 U
58 U
59 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
33 J-
45 J
190
220
93
73
81
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
33 J-
20 J
140
150
37 J
31 J
31 J
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
26 UJ
52 U
53 U
49 U
59 U
58 U
59 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
26 UJ
52 U
53 U
49 U
59 U
58 U
59 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
ug/kg
84
92
373
418
182
137
153
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value
linlded iind Shiided delected \alucs e\ceal H\C sciv.viiiiiu \aluc
FD = Field Duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
ug/kg = microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
J = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.
J + = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
J - = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
U = The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported
sample quantitation limit.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 12 of 16
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (ft):
RB 15-24
RB15-24
RB 15-24
RB15-24
RB15-24
RB 15-24
RB15-24
RB15-24-SURF
RB15-24-0010
RB15-24-1020
RB 15-24-2040
RB15-24-2040FD
RB15-24-4050
RB 15-24-5060
11/4/2015
11/5/2015
11/5/2015
11/5/2015
11/5/2015
11/5/2015
11/5/2015
0-0.5
0-1
1-2
2-4
2-4
4-5
5-6
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
89 U
57 U
59 U
60 U
58 U
52 U
39 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
89 U
57 U
59 U
60 U
58 U
52 U
39 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
89 U
57 U
59 U
60 U
58 U
52 U
39 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
58 J
100 J
39 J
25 J
34 J
15 J
39 U
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
89 U
57 U
59 U
60 U
58 U
52 U
39 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
150
440
220
49 J
64
25 J
39 U
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
120
270
84 J
32 J
37 J
17 J
39 U
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
89 U
57 U
59 U
60 U
58 U
52 U
39 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
89 U
57 U
59 U
60 U
58 U
52 U
39 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
ug/kg
328
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-24
RB15-25
RB15-25
RB15-26
RB15-26
RB15-26
RB15-26
Sample Name:
RB 15-24-6080
RB15-25-SURF
RB15-25-0010
RB15-26-SURF
RB15-26-0010
RB15-26-1030
RB15-26-1030FD
Sample Date:
11/5/2015
11/4/2015
11/5/2015
11/3/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
6-8
0-0.5
0-1
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
1-3
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
41 U
44 U
39 U
37 U
42 U
41 U
41 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
41 U
44 U
39 U
37 U
42 U
41 U
41 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
41 U
44 U
39 U
37 U
42 U
41 U
41 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
41 U
44 U
39 U
5.5 J
42 U
41 U
41 U
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
41 U
44 U
39 U
37 U
42 U
41 U
41 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
41 U
44 U
39 U
17 J
42 U
41 U
41 U
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
41 U
44 U
39 U
5.5 J
42 U
41 U
41 U
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
41 U
44 U
39 U
37 U
42 U
41 U
41 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
41 U
44 U
39 U
37 U
42 U
41 U
41 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
ug/kg
0
0
0
28
0
0
0
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value
linlded iind Shiided delected \alucs e\ceal H\C sciv.viiiiiu \aluc
FD = Field Duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
ug/kg = microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
J = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.
J + = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
J - = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
U = The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported
sample quantitation limit.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 14 of 16
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-26
RB15-27
RB15-27
RB15-27
RB15-27
RB15-27
RB15-27
RB15-28
Sample Name:
RB15-26-3050
RB15-27-SURF
RB15-27-0010
RB15-27-1030
RB15-27-3050
RB 15-27-5065
RB15-27-6570
RB15-28-SURF
Sample Date:
11/4/2015
10/26/2015
10/28/2015
10/28/2015
10/28/2015
10/28/2015
10/28/2015
10/26/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
3-5
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-5
5-6.5
6.5-7
0-0.5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
39 U
42 U
44 U
56 U
61 U
50 U
39 U
79 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
39 U
42 U
44 U
56 U
61 U
50 U
39 U
79 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
39 U
42 U
44 U
56 U
61 U
50 U
39 U
79 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
39 U
70
74
56 U
61 U
50 U
39 U
100
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
39 U
42 U
44 U
56 U
61 U
50 U
39 U
79 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
39 U
76
78
43 J
61 U
50 U
39 U
160
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
39 U
55
58
32 J
61 U
50 U
39 U
130
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
39 U
42 U
44 U
56 U
61 U
50 U
39 U
79 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
39 U
42 U
44 U
56 U
61 U
50 U
39 U
79 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
ug/kg
0
201
210
75
0
0
0
390
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value
linlded iind Shiided delected \alucs e\ceal H\C sciv.viiiiiu \aluc
FD = Field Duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
ug/kg = microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
J = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.
J + = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
J - = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
U = The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported
sample quantitation limit.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 15 of 16
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-4 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PCB AROCLORS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-28
RB15-28
Sample Name:
RB15-28-0010
RB15-28-1030
Sample Date:
10/28/2015
10/28/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
0-1
1-3
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Aroclor-1016
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
56 U
40 U
Aroclor-1221
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
56 U
40 U
Aroclor-1232
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
56 U
40 U
Aroclor-1242
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
52 J
40 U
Aroclor-1248
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
56 U
40 U
Aroclor-1254
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
69
5.3 J
Aroclor-1260
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
54 J
3.8 J
Aroclor-1262
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
56 U
40 U
Aroclor-1268
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
56 U
40 U
Total PCBs ND=0
59.8
676
ug/kg
175
9.1
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value
linlded iind Shiided delected \alucs e\ceal H\C sciv.viiiiiu \aluc
FD = Field Duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
ug/kg = microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PCB = Polychlorinated biphenyl
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment
Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
J = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.
J + = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
J - = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
U = The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported
sample quantitation limit.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 16 of 16
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.25
TABLE 3-5 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PAHS
Location ID:
RBI 5-01
RBI 5-01
RB15-01
RBI 5-01
RBI 5-02
RBI 5-02
RBI 5-02
RBI 5-02
RBI 5-02
RBI 5-03
RBI 5-03
RBI 5-03
Sample Name:
RB15-01-SURF
RB15-01-0010
RB15-01-1030
RBI 5-01-3050
RB15-02-SURF
RB 15-02-SURFFD
RBI 5-02-0010
RBI 5-02-1030
RBI 5-02-3040
RB15-03-SURF
RBI 5-03-0010
RBI 5-03-1030
Sample Date:
10/30/2015
11/3/2015
11/3/2015
11/3/2015
10/31/2015
10/31/2015
11/3/2015
11/3/2015
11/3/2015
10/31/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
De
pth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-4
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
1 -Methylnaphthalene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
250 U
480 U
450 U
630 U
980 U
940 U
11000U
19000
530
150 U
600 U
3200
2-Methyhiaphthalene**
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
250 U
72 J
350 J
570 J
240 J
940 U
11000U
14000
430
25 J
190 J
3500
Acenaphthene**
6.71*
NSL
ug/kg
91 J
190 J
300 J
460 J
530 J
350 J
13000
25000
460
71 J
530 J
2600
Acenaphthylene**
5.87*
NSL
ug/kg
27 J
71 J
95 J
190 J
160 J
120 J
3500 J
3500 J
37 J
36 J
190 J
430 J
Anthracene**
57.2
845
ug/kg
210 J
520
740
1000
1100
840 J
36000
42000
420
170
910
3500
Benzo(a)anthracene**
108
1050
ug/kg
1100
2500
2200
3300
4300
3200
68000
48000
410
850
3400
6500 J
Benzo(a)pyrene**
150
1450
ug/kg
1200
2300
2000
3000
4800
3600
59000
36000
310
950
2900
4900
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
10400*
NSL
ug/kg
1400
2500
2100
3000
4000
2800
36000
19000
210
1000
2600
3600 J
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene**
170*
NSL
ug/kg
770
1600
1400
2000
2500
2000
30000
17000
170
540
1400
2400
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
240*
NSL
ug/kg
950
2200
1800
2500
3400
2700
35000
24000
210
650
2300
3800
Benzofelpyrene
150
1450
ug/kg
1000
1900
1600
2400
3300
2600
38000
22000
200
730
2200
3700
Cl-Chiysenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
380 J
1000 J
1000 J
1900 J
1500 J
1300 J
29000 J
31000 J
240 J
340 J
2300 J
5700 J
C 1-Fluoranthenes/pyrene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
1300 J
2900 J
3300 J
5100 J
5900 J
4700 J
130000 J
110000 J
890 J
1300 J
8000 J
18000 J
Cl-Fluorenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
250 U
480 U
450 U
640 J
980 U
940 U
11000U
13000 J
150 J
150 U
600 U
1800 J
C 1-Naphthalenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
250 U
480 U
450 U
670 J
980 U
940 U
11000U
22000 J
620 J
150 U
600 U
4600 J
C 1-Phenanthrenes/ Anthracenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
390 J
970 J
2000 J
3200 J
1900 J
1500 J
62000 J
88000 J
710 J
390 J
5600 J
16000 J
C2-Chiysenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
250 U
490 J
630 J
1300 J
980 U
940 U
11000U
14000 J
130 U
170 J
1800 J
4600 J
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
580 J
1400 J
1800 J
3300 J
2300 J
1700 J
35000 J
41000 J
360 J
520 J
5200 J
12000 J
C2-Fluorenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
250 U
480 U
900 J
1400 J
980 U
940 U
11000U
10000 U
130 U
150 U
1100 J
3000 J
C2-Naphthalenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
250 U
480 U
2500 J
4400 J
980 U
940 U
24000 J
84000 J
1200 J
150 U
2700 J
19000 J
C2-Phenanthrenes/ Anthracenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
250 U
690 J
2100 J
3600 J
980 U
940 U
25000 J
43000 J
380 J
270 J
9300 J
17000 J
C3-Chiysenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
250 U
480 U
450 U
750 J
980 U
940 U
11000U
10000 U
130 U
150 U
850 J
2400 J
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
250 U
690 J
1100 J
1800 J
980 U
940 U
11000U
14000 J
130 J
180 J
2700 J
7700 J
C3-Fluorenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
250 U
480 U
1200 J
1700 J
980 U
940 U
11000U
10000 U
130 U
150 U
2100 J
4100 J
C3-Naphthalenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
250 U
620 J
4100 J
6900 J
980 U
940 U
23000 J
58000 J
600 J
160 J
4700 J
18000 J
C3-Phenanthrenes/ Anthracenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
250 U
560 J
2200 J
3800 J
980 U
940 U
13000 J
21000 J
200 J
250 J
11000 J
22000 J
C4-Chrysenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
250 U
480 U
450 U
630 U
980 U
940 U
11000U
10000 U
130 U
150 U
600 U
1600 U
C4-Naphthalenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
250 U
480 U
2700 J
4600 J
980 U
940 U
11000U
15000 J
240 J
150 U
3900 J
8600 J
C4-Phenanthrenes/ Anthracenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
250 U
480 U
1100 J
2400 J
980 U
940 U
11000U
10000 U
130 U
150 U
6400 J
13000 J
Chrysene**
166
1290
ug/kg
1300
2700
2400
3600
4300
3400
63000
42000
370
890
3500
7000
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene "
33
NSL
ug/kg
250
540
450
680
690 J
540 J
8100 J
5200 J
45 J
150
410 J
860 J
Fluoranthene**
423
2230
ug/kg
2500
5200
5100
6800
7900
5900
92000
73000
670
1600
6200
9800
Fluorene**
77.4
536
ug/kg
84 J
220 J
370 J
540 J
400 J
280 J
12000
21000
310
75 J
440 J
2100
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene **
200*
NSL
ug/kg
800
1600
1300
1900
2600
2000
24000
15000
140
540
1200
2000
Naphthalene**
176
561
ug/kg
46 J
480 U
120 J
250 J
480 J
940 U
11000U
5000 J
260
38 J
140 J
1100 J
Perylene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
330
660
540
800
1200
940 U
11000
10000 U
130 U
250
710
1600 U
Phenanthrene
204
1170
ug/kg
1100
2200
2900
4200
4600
3300
92000
110000
1300
840
4000
14000
Pyrene**
195
1520
ug/kg
2100
4800
4700
6700
7900
6200
150000
100000
920
1500
5700
12000
Total PAH17 ND=1/2RL
1610
22800
ug/kg
14053
29453
28325
40690
49900
38170
743600
599700
6672
9925
36010
80090
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
ug/kg = Microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
RL = Reporting limit
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
J = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.
U = The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported
sample quantitation limit.
*TEC value based on USEPA Region 5 RCRA Ecological Screening Value (EPA 2003)
** Analytes inlcuded in Total 17 PAH calculations
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 9
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.25
TABLE 3-5 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PAHS
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
RBI 5-03
RBI 5-03
RBI 5-04
RBI 5-04
RBI 5-04
RBI 5-04
RBI 5-04
RBI 5-05
RBI 5-05
RBI 5-05
RBI 5-06
RBI 5-06
RBI 5-06
RBI 5-03-3050
RBI 5-03-5070
RB15-04-SURF
RBI 5-04-0010
RBI 5-04-1030
RBI 5-04-1030FD
RBI 5-04-3040
RB15-05-SURF
RBI 5-05-0010
RB15-05-1030
RB15-06-SURF
RBI 5-06-0010
RBI 5-06-1030
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
10/31/2015
11/3/2015
11/3/2015
11/3/2015
11/3/2015
10/31/2015
11/3/2015
11/3/2015
10/31/2015
11/3/2015
11/3/2015
De
pth Interval (ft):
3-5
5-7
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
1-3
3-4
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
1 -Methylnaphthalene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
7800
190
2500 U
5000 U
860 U
1600 U
8.3
270 U
2700 U
9.9
460 U
23 U
5.4
2-Methyhiaphthalene**
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
10000
190
750 J
800 J
300 J
590 J
7.1
55 J
2700 U
8.7
460 U
9.9 J
4.3 J
Acenaphthene**
6.71*
NSL
ug/kg
8500
210
2000 J
6000
1000
1700
4.4
130 J
310 J
2.3 J
250 J
11 J
1.9 J
Acenaphthylene**
5.87*
NSL
ug/kg
1200 J
28 J
2500 U
1300 J
230 J
250 J
1.7 J
93 J
1100 J
1.8 J
120 J
7.4 J
0.91 J
Anthracene**
57.2
845
ug/kg
17000
310
5700
19000
3300
4600
10
370
3200
5.4
630
34
3.8 J
Benzo(a)anthracene**
108
1050
ug/kg
20000
480
9600
29000
6700
7400
17
1300
15000
19
2400 J
150
5.7
Benzo(a)pyrene**
150
1450
ug/kg
16000
370
8500
21000
5300
5700
14
1400
15000
18
2400
130
4.7
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
10400*
NSL
ug/kg
9500
310
7000
15000
3900
4600
11
890
7100
19
1500 J
100
6.7
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene**
170*
NSL
ug/kg
6300
190
4200
10000
2700
3200
17
670
8800
24
1200
81
9.7
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
240*
NSL
ug/kg
12000
240
7100
15000
3600
4300
9.1
780
8900
13
1800
84
3.4 J
Benzofelpyrene
150
1450
ug/kg
9500
250
5500
14000
3300
3700
13
930
10000
19
1600
100
7.6
Cl-Chrysenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
11000 J
290 J
3100 J
15000 J
2800 J
2900 J
19 J
680 J
5400 J
23 J
1000 J
87 J
16 J
C 1-Fluoranthenes/pyrene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
52000 J
1100 J
11000 J
53000 J
9500 J
10000 J
47 J
2800 J
26000 J
45 J
4300 J
220 J
29 J
Cl-Fluorenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
5900 U
110 J
2500 U
5000 U
860 U
1600 U
8.3 J
270 U
2700 U
8.8 J
460 U
23 U
7.5 J
C 1-Naphthalenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
13000 J
250 J
2500 U
5000 U
860 U
1600 U
11 J
270 U
2700 U
12 J
460 U
23 U
6.4 J
C 1-Phenanthrenes/ Anthracenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
37000 J
790 J
4600 J
39000 J
4800 J
5600 J
50 J
1200 J
9400 J
47 J
1200 J
160 J
50 J
C2-Chrysenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
7700 J
190 J
2500 U
7000 J
1100 J
1600 U
20 J
270 U
2700 U
22 J
460 U
46 J
16 J
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
20000 J
480 J
4600 J
22000 J
3800 J
3800 J
41 J
900 J
7000 J
57 J
1400 J
140 J
39 J
C2-Fluorenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
5900 U
93 J
2500 U
5600 J
860 U
1600 U
12 J
270 U
2700 U
16 J
460 U
37 J
15 J
C2-Naphthalenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
38000 J
850 J
2500 U
16000 J
1800 J
2300 J
43 J
300 J
2700 U
51 J
460 U
110 J
43 J
C2-Phenanthrenes/ Anthracenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
20000 J
510 J
2500 J
22000 J
2600 J
3000 J
50 J
580 J
4200 J
62 J
750 J
170 J
61 J
C3-Chrysenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
5900 U
100 J
2500 U
5000 U
860 U
1600 U
15 J
270 U
2700 U
24 J
460 U
47 J
18 J
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
6800 J
210 J
2500 U
8500 J
1600 J
1600 J
36 J
270 J
2700 U
44 J
460 U
89 J
39 J
C3-Fluorenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
5900 U
100 J
2500 U
5000 U
860 U
1600 U
18 J
270 U
2700 U
22 J
460 U
55 J
20 J
C3-Naphthalenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
26000 J
740 J
2500 U
22000 J
1700 J
2200 J
96 J
280 J
2700 U
120 J
460 U
430 J
150 J
C3-Phenanthrenes/ Anthracenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
19000 J
470 J
2500 U
15000 J
1600 J
1700 J
61 J
320 J
2700 U
71 J
600 J
180 J
71 J
C4-Chrysenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
5900 U
83 U
2500 U
5000 U
860 U
1600 U
7.2 J
270 U
2700 U
7.2 J
460 U
28 J
7.4 J
C4-Naphthalenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
9800 J
300 J
2500 U
9300 J
860 U
1600 U
94 J
270 U
2700 U
110 J
460 U
370 J
140 J
C4-Phenanthrenes/ Anthracenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
10000 J
260 J
2500 U
7900 J
860 U
1600 U
46 J
270 U
2700 U
56 J
460 U
130 J
56 J
Chrysene**
166
1290
ug/kg
19000
430
9400
26000
5700
6300
21
1200
12000
27
2300
150
12
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene "
33
NSL
ug/kg
2000 J
44 J
1300 J
3200 J
850 J
1100 J
2.8 J
210 J
1800 J
3.7 J
300 J
26
1.6 J
Fluoranthene**
423
2230
ug/kg
31000
850
23000
49000
11000
13000
27
1800
20000
33
3600
210
7.9
Fluorene**
77.4
536
ug/kg
7700
180
2800
7100
860
2000
5.5
110 J
340 J
3.8 J
250 J
16 J
2.7 J
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene **
200*
NSL
ug/kg
5400 J
150
4600
9700
2500
3000
6.9
580
6500
10
1200
70
2.6 J
Naphthalene**
176
561
ug/kg
3900 J
87
2100 J
990 J
290 J
850 J
3.9 J
81 J
2700 U
4
130 J
7.7 J
2.4 J
Perylene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
5900 U
87
2500 U
5000 U
1300
1600 U
9.1
270 U
2700 U
13
560
38
7.8
Phenanthrene
204
1170
ug/kg
50000
1100
23000
51000
7300
12000
34
1300
7900
22
2400
160
20
Pyrene**
195
1520
ug/kg
43000
920
19000
61000
13000
14000
38
2600
38000
36
4900
250
13
Total PAH17 ND=1/2RL
1610
22800
ug/kg
262500
6089
132550
325090
68530
84590
230.4
13569
151350
250.7
25610
1497
103.31
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
ug/kg = Microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
RL = Reporting limit
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
J = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.
U = The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported
sample quantitation limit.
*TEC value based on USEPA Region 5 RCRA Ecological Screening Value (EPA 2003)
** Analytes inlcuded in Total 17 PAH calculations
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 2 of 9
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.25
TABLE 3-5 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PAHS
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
RBI 5-07
RBI 5-07
RBI 5-07
RBI 5-07
RBI 5-08
RBI 5-08
RBI 5-08
RBI 5-09
RBI 5-09
RBI 5-09
RB15-10
RB15-10
RB15-07-SURF
RBI 5-07-0010
RBI 5-07-1020
RBI 5-07-2030
RB15-08-SURF
RB15-08-SURFFD
RBI 5-08-0010
RB15-09-SURF
RB 15-09-SURFFD
RBI 5-09-0010
RB15-10-SURF
RB15-10-0010
11/1/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/1/2015
11/1/2015
11/2/2015
11/1/2015
11/1/2015
11/2/2015
11/1/2015
11/2/2015
De
pth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
1-2
2-3
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-1
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-1
0-0.5
0-1
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
1 -Methylnaphthalene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
990 U
220 U
290 U
89 U
300 U
110U
230 U
740 U
540 U
2000 U
210 U
150 U
2-Methyhiaphthalene**
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
990 U
40 J
100 J
29 J
300 U
110 u
33 J
740 U
82 J
1200 J
210 U
150 U
Acenaphthene**
6.71*
NSL
ug/kg
280 J
120 J
230 J
32 J
140 J
56 J
71 J
280 J
300 J
2000
93 J
67 J
Acenaphthylene**
5.87*
NSL
ug/kg
190 J
37 J
250 J
89 U
57 J
31 J
260
130 J
78 J
370 J
210 U
31 J
Anthracene**
57.2
845
ug/kg
1000
320
610
24 J
370 J
120 J
220 J
760
720
4700
590
230
Benzo(a)anthracene**
108
1050
ug/kg
3500
960
1200
63 J
1300
530
910
2100
1800
6900
740
900
Benzo(a)pyrene**
150
1450
ug/kg
3900
910
1200
67 J
1100
490
1800
2000
1800
4800
430
860
B enzo(b)fluoranthene
10400*
NSL
ug/kg
2100
660
580
33 J
1200
490
1200
1700
1700
3600
460
720
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene**
170*
NSL
ug/kg
1800
440
510
44 J
570
260
1000
1000
810
2000
200 J
540
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
240*
NSL
ug/kg
2400
750
850
38 J
920
370
920
1600
1300
4400
430
610
Benzofelpyrene
150
1450
ug/kg
2400
600
780
89 U
840
360
1200
1400
1300
3000
330
530
Cl-Chrysenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
1300 J
340 J
470 J
89 U
420 J
190 J
650 J
740 J
700 J
2300 J
210 U
320 J
CI -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
6500 J
1300 J
2400 J
160 J
1400 J
710 J
1700 J
3000 J
2500 J
8700 J
1000 J
1400 J
Cl-Fluorenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
990 U
220 U
290 U
89 U
300 U
110U
230 U
740 U
540 U
2000 U
210 U
150 U
CI -Naphthalenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
990 U
220 U
290 U
89 U
300 U
110U
230 U
740 U
540 U
2000 U
210 U
150 U
CI -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
2500 J
500 J
950 J
160 J
500 J
260 J
800 J
1400 J
1100 J
6200 J
400 J
530 J
C2-Chrysenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
990 U
220 U
290 U
89 U
300 U
110U
410 J
740 U
540 U
2000 U
210 U
180 J
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
1900 J
530 J
730 J
89 U
630 J
290 J
960 J
1200 J
1100 J
3900 J
330 J
580 J
C2-Fluorenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
990 U
220 U
290 U
89 U
300 U
110U
230 U
740 U
540 U
2000 U
210 U
150 U
C2-Naphthalenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
990 U
220 U
360 J
120 J
300 U
110U
230 U
740 U
540 U
2800 J
210 U
150 U
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
1200 J
270 J
440 J
140 J
300 U
130 J
460 J
740 U
540 J
2500 J
210 U
350 J
C3-Chrysenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
990 U
220 U
290 U
89 U
300 U
110U
230 U
740 U
540 U
2000 U
210 U
150 U
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
990 U
220 U
290 U
89 U
300 U
110U
330 J
740 U
540 U
2000 U
210 U
180 J
C3-Fluorenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
990 U
220 U
290 U
89 U
300 U
110U
230 U
740 U
540 U
2000 U
210 U
150 U
C3-Naphthalenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
990 U
220 U
300 J
290 J
300 U
110U
230 U
740 U
540 U
2000 U
210 U
150 U
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
990 U
220 U
310 J
150 J
300 U
110U
280 J
740 U
540 U
2000 U
210 U
280 J
C4-Chrysenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
990 U
220 U
290 U
89 U
300 U
110U
230 U
740 U
540 U
2000 U
210 U
150 U
C4-Naphthalenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
990 U
220 U
290 U
270 J
300 U
110 U
230 U
740 U
540 U
2000 U
210 U
150 U
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
990 U
220 U
290 U
93 J
300 U
110 U
230 U
740 U
540 U
2000 U
210 U
230 J
Chrysene**
166
1290
ug/kg
3100
890
1100
70 J
1200
480
890
2000
1800
6200
740
760
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene**
33
NSL
ug/kg
520 J
160 J
130 J
8 J
210 J
91 J
320
410 J
250 J
680 J
63 J
150
Fluoranthene**
423
2230
ug/kg
5300
1800
2200
78 J
2400
1000
1800
4500
3700
17000
2300
1300
Fluorene**
77.4
536
ug/kg
230 J
110 J
310
21 J
160 J
63 J
92 J
310 J
310 J
2500
240
64 J
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene**
200*
NSL
ug/kg
1600
460
460
25 J
610
290
880
1100
850
2200
210
490
Naphthalene**
176
561
ug/kg
990 U
67 J
340
250
89 J
21 J
230 U
740 U
130 J
2700
210 U
150 U
Perylene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
990 U
230
290 U
89 U
300 U
130
360
740 U
540 U
2000 U
210 U
210
Phenanthrene
204
1170
ug/kg
3300
1100
2900
120
1400
540
870
3600
2700
19000
1800
710
Pyrene**
195
1520
ug/kg
7400
1600
3200
130
1800
940
1700
4400
3000
12000
1400
1400
Total PAH17 ND=1/2RL
1610
22800
ug/kg
37610
10424
16170
1054.5
13676
5827
13081
26630
21330
92250
10011
8982
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
ug/kg = Microgram per kilogram
ND =Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
RL = Reporting limit
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
J = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.
U = The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported
sample quantitation limit.
*TEC value based on USEPA Region 5 RCRA Ecological Screening Value (EPA 2003)
** Analytes inlcuded in Total 17 PAH calculations
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 3 of 9
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.25
TABLE 3-5 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PAHS
Location ID:
RB15-11
RB15-11
RB15-11
RB15-11
RB15-12
RB15-12
RB15-13
RB15-13
RB15-13
RB15-13
RB15-13
RB15-14
Sample Name:
RB15-11-SURF
RB15-11-0010
RB15-11-1030
RB15-11-1030FD
RB15-12-0010
RB15-12-1030
RB15-13-SURF
RB15-13-0010
RB15-13-1025
RB15-13-2535
RB15-13-3550
RB15-14-SURF
Sample Date:
11/3/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/2/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/2/2015
De
pth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
1-3
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
0-1
1-2.5
2.5-3.5
3.5-5
0-0.5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
1 -Methylnaphthalene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
34000
4400
90
39
200000 U
11000000U
5300 U
2100 U
16000
90000
1800
1000 U
2-Methyhiaphthalene**
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
33000
4500
93
38
250000
5000000 J
870 J
690 J
4100 J
93000
660
410 J
Acenaphthene**
6.71*
NSL
ug/kg
22000
3400
65
21 J
220000
3200000 J
3200 J
3700
17000
86000
1500
700 J
Acenaphthylene**
5.87*
NSL
ug/kg
7800 J
730 J
15 J
3.1 J
20000 J
11000000U
5300 U
670 J
1700 J
5900 J
45 J
410 J
Anthracene**
57.2
845
ug/kg
50000
4900
77
19 J
360000
3700000 J
10000
5900
18000
83000
1600
1600
Benzo(a)anthracene**
108
1050
ug/kg
56000
5000
64
9.7 J
200000
1600000 J
23000
10000
21000
76000
1900
5900
Benzo(a)pyrene**
150
1450
ug/kg
44000
3800
53
7.7 J
150000 J
1000000 J
18000
8500
17000
65000
1300
5200
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
10400*
NSL
ug/kg
31000
2700
40 J
12 J
130000 J
11000000u
16000
6000
9900
35000
990
3900
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene**
170*
NSL
ug/kg
20000
2000
36 J
16 J
83000 J
11000000u
9800
4000
7800
25000
730
3300
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
240*
NSL
ug/kg
29000
2700
36 J
5.5 J
130000 J
11000000u
14000
7000
14000
44000
1200
4100
Benzofelpyrene
150
1450
ug/kg
26000
2300
45 U
25 U
200000 U
11000000u
13000
5500
11000
40000
840
3600
Cl-Chrysenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
34000 J
1900 J
56 J
35 J
200000 U
11000000u
8100 J
4600 J
9000 J
33000 J
620 J
2800 J
C 1-Fluoranthenes/pyrene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
86000 J
8200 J
140 J
54 J
260000 J
11000000u
26000 J
16000 J
39000 J
140000 J
2600 J
7800 J
Cl-Fluorenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
11000U
1600 U
45 U
25 U
200000 U
11000000u
5300 U
2100 U
4900 U
21000 U
430 U
1000 U
C 1-Naphthalenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
42000 J
5600 J
110 J
50 J
310000 J
11000000u
5300 U
2100 U
12000 J
120000 J
1500 J
1000 U
C 1-Phenanthrenes/ Anthracenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
66000 J
6400 J
150 J
100 J
200000 U
11000000u
12000 J
11000 J
27000 J
120000 J
1900 J
3200 J
C2-Chrysenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
11000U
1600 U
51 J
34 J
200000 U
11000000u
5300 U
2800 J
4900 U
21000 U
430 U
1100 J
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
27000 J
2800 J
90 J
71 J
200000 U
11000000u
11000 J
5600 J
13000 J
44000 J
860 J
3300 J
C2-Fluorenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
11000u
1600 U
45 U
35 J
200000 U
11000000u
5300 U
2100 U
4900 U
21000 U
430 U
1000 U
C2-Naphthalenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
68000 J
8100 J
190 J
92 J
200000 U
11000000u
5300 U
8100 J
39000 J
180000 J
3000 J
1200 J
C2-Phenanthrenes/ Anthracenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
28000 J
2800 J
130 J
130 J
200000 U
11000000u
5700 J
5500 J
14000 J
52000 J
840 J
2100 J
C3-Chrysenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
11000U
1600 U
45 U
39 J
200000 U
11000000u
5300 U
2100 U
4900 U
21000 U
430 U
1000 U
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
11000U
1600 U
73 J
74 J
200000 U
11000000u
5300 U
2100 U
4900 U
21000 U
430 U
1200 J
C3-Fluorenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
11000U
1600 U
45 U
49 J
200000 U
11000000u
5300 U
2100 U
4900 U
21000 U
430 U
1000 U
C3-Naphthalenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
36000 J
4100 J
220 J
240 J
200000 U
11000000u
5300 U
7100 J
21000 J
81000 J
1200 J
1300 J
C3-Phenanthrenes/ Anthracenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
14000 J
1600 U
150 J
140 J
200000 U
11000000u
5300 U
3100 J
8500 J
23000 J
430 U
1200 J
C4-Chrysenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
11000U
1600 U
45 U
25 U
200000 U
11000000u
5300 U
2100 U
4900 U
21000 U
430 U
1000 U
C4-Naphthalenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
11000U
1600 U
190 J
250 J
200000 U
11000000u
5300 U
2200 J
6400 J
21000 U
430 U
1000 U
C4-Phenanthrenes/ Anthracenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
11000U
1600 U
100 J
110 J
200000 U
11000000u
5300 U
2100 U
4900 U
21000 U
430 U
1000 U
Chrysene**
166
1290
ug/kg
40000
3700
69
31
170000 J
1500000 J
20000
9200
19000
67000
1600
5400
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene "
33
NSL
ug/kg
7300 J
620 J
9.5 J
2.5 J
28000 J
11000000u
3700 J
1400 J
2700 J
8600 J
270 J
1000
Fluoranthene**
423
2230
ug/kg
120000
11000
160 J
32 J
540000
4800000 J
45000
17000
39000
140000
3800
10000
Fluorene**
77.4
536
ug/kg
41000
4500
77
22 J
230000
3300000 J
4400 J
2700
9800
56000
900
700 J
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene **
200*
NSL
ug/kg
22000
1900
24 J
4 J
82000 J
430000 J
9900
4200
7900
27000
750
3000
Naphthalene**
176
561
ug/kg
41000
9000
590
340
2600000
99000000
1800 J
1200 J
4500 J
42000
1800
1000
Perylene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
11000
1600 U
45 U
25 U
200000 U
11000000u
5300 U
2100
4900 U
21000 U
430 U
1300
Phenanthrene
204
1170
ug/kg
170000
18000
290 J
75 J
760000
7900000 J
35000
15000
47000
220000
3900
5600
Pyrene**
195
1520
ug/kg
140000
12000
180 J
37 J
440000
4300000 J
43000
20000
46000
170000
3200
11000
Total PAH17 ND=1/2RL
1610
22800
ug/kg
874100
90450
1860.5
667.5
6351500
182230000
262970
117160
286400
1243500
26145
63220
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
ug/kg = Microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
RL = Reporting limit
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
J = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.
U = The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported
sample quantitation limit.
*TEC value based on USEPA Region 5 RCRA Ecological Screening Value (EPA 2003)
** Analytes inlcuded in Total 17 PAH calculations
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 4 of 9
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.25
TABLE 3-5 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PAHS
Location ID:
RB15-14
RB15-14
RB15-14
RB15-15
RB15-15
RB15-15
RB15-15
RB15-15
RB15-15
RB15-16
RB15-16
RB15-16
RB15-16
Sample Name:
RB15-14-0010
RB15-14-1030
RBI 5-14-3050
RB15-15-SURF
RB15-15-0010
RB15-15-1020
RBI 5-15-2040
RB15-15-2040FD
RBI 5-15-4060
RB15-16-SURF
RB15-16-0010
RB15-16-1030
RBI 5-16-3040
Sample Date:
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/2/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/2/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
De
pth Interval (ft):
0-1
1-3
3-5
0-0.5
0-1
1-2
2-4
2-4
4-6
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-4
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
1 -Methylnaphthalene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
33000
120000
880
260 U
110000
11000
110000
79000
900
550 U
17000
300000
360000
2-Methyhiaphthalene**
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
35000
150000
1000
120 J
160000
15000
150000
100000
1200
110 J
10000
410000
410000
Acenaphthene**
6.71*
NSL
ug/kg
32000
90000
810
240 J
100000
8200
88000
63000
930
370 J
20000
270000
280000
Acenaphthylene**
5.87*
NSL
ug/kg
2700 J
4200 J
49 J
160 J
3100 J
240 J
3300 J
2400 J
36 J
260 J
1300 J
9500 J
10000 J
Anthracene**
57.2
845
ug/kg
40000
80000
950
500
67000
5800
55000
37000
670
740
19000
190000
210000
Benzo(a)anthracene**
108
1050
ug/kg
35000
53000
940
2300 J
36000
2400
32000
22000
420
3600
15000
100000
87000 J
Benzo(a)pyrene**
150
1450
ug/kg
28000
42000
650
2400
26000
1700 J
23000
15000 J
360
3300
11000
77000 J
64000 J
B enzo(b)fluoranthene
10400*
NSL
ug/kg
20000
23000
350
2200 J
15000 J
990 J
11000 J
6700 J
200 J
2100
6500
40000 J
23000 J
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene**
170*
NSL
ug/kg
15000
19000 J
270
1500
11000 J
770 J
9200 J
5700 J
190 J
1900
5100
31000 J
24000 J
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
240*
NSL
ug/kg
22000
31000
540
1500
18000 J
1100 J
14000 J
8700 J
200 J
2000
7800
49000 J
44000 J
Benzofelpyrene
150
1450
ug/kg
18000
26000
380
1600
24000 U
2000 U
18000U
16000 U
230
2300
7000
97000 U
98000 U
Cl-Chrysenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
15000 J
24000 J
390 J
960 J
24000 U
2000 U
21000 J
16000 U
250 J
1600 J
6900 J
97000 U
98000 U
CI -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
54000 J
110000 J
1500 J
3200 J
84000 J
5000 J
93000 J
67000 J
990 J
6100 J
30000 J
240000 J
270000 J
Cl-Fluorenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
8700 U
20000 U
240 J
260 U
24000 U
2000 U
22000 J
16000 U
210 U
550 U
4500 J
97000 U
98000 U
CI -Naphthalenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
43000 J
180000 J
1200 J
260 U
170000 J
16000 J
170000 J
120000 J
1300 J
550 U
17000 J
450000 J
560000 J
CI -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
43000 J
100000 J
1100 J
990 J
77000 J
4900 J
93000 J
71000 J
850 J
2100 J
23000 J
230000 J
270000 J
C2-Chrysenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
8700 U
20000 U
210 U
480 J
24000 U
2000 U
18000U
16000 U
210 U
620 J
4200 U
97000 U
98000 U
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
16000 J
32000 J
510 J
1300 J
24000 J
2000 U
34000 J
25000 J
390 J
2000 J
8200 J
97000 U
98000 U
C2-Fluorenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
8700 U
20000 U
210 U
260 U
24000 U
2000 U
18000U
16000 U
210 U
550 U
4200 U
97000 U
98000 U
C2-Naphthalenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
63000 J
190000 J
1400 J
420 J
150000 J
11000 J
180000 J
130000 J
1600 J
550 U
31000 J
450000 J
560000 J
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
18000 J
40000 J
510 J
670 J
27000 J
2000 U
40000 J
28000 J
420 J
1200 J
9500 J
97000 U
120000 J
C3-Chrysenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
8700 U
20000 U
210 U
260 U
24000 U
2000 U
18000U
16000 U
210 U
550 U
4200 U
97000 U
98000 U
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
8700 U
20000 U
210 U
430 J
24000 U
2000 U
18000U
16000 U
210 U
550 U
4200 U
97000 U
98000 U
C3-Fluorenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
8700 U
20000 U
210 U
260 U
24000 U
2000 U
18000U
16000 U
210 U
550 U
4200 U
97000 U
98000 U
C3-Naphthalenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
29000 J
74000 J
700 J
350 J
57000 J
3600 J
74000 J
54000 J
830 J
550 J
16000 J
170000 J
220000 J
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
8700 U
20000 U
300 J
460 J
24000 U
2000 U
21000 J
16000 U
240 J
650 J
4600 J
97000 U
98000 U
C4-Chrysenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
8700 U
20000 U
210 U
260 U
24000 U
2000 U
18000U
16000 U
210 U
550 U
4200 U
97000 U
98000 U
C4-Naphthalenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
8700 U
20000 U
240 J
260 U
24000 U
2000 U
18000U
16000 U
260 J
550 U
4200 U
97000 U
98000 U
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
8700 U
20000 U
210 U
260 U
24000 U
2000 U
18000U
16000 U
210 U
550 U
4200 U
97000 U
98000 U
Chrysene**
166
1290
ug/kg
32000
48000
760
2000
31000
2100
27000
18000
370
3000
13000
86000 J
80000 J
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene**
33
NSL
ug/kg
4900 J
5900 J
80 J
450
3100 J
240 J
3300 J
1900 J
46 J
550
1700 J
9000 J
98000 U
Fluoranthene**
423
2230
ug/kg
63000
110000
1800
3600
72000
4900
52000
34000
840
4400
26000
200000
150000
Fluorene**
77.4
536
ug/kg
22000
57000
520
190 J
53000
4100
41000
29000
470
260 J
12000
150000
140000
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene**
200*
NSL
ug/kg
14000
17000 J
260
1300
11000 J
710 J
8200 J
4900 J
130 J
1600
4900
29000 J
18000 J
Naphthalene**
176
561
ug/kg
38000
250000
1500
240 J
270000
20000
210000
150000
2100
230 J
17000
700000
700000
Perylene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
8700 U
20000 U
210 U
550
24000 U
2000 U
18000U
16000 U
210 U
670
4200 U
97000 U
98000 U
Phenanthrene
204
1170
ug/kg
80000
210000
2300
1600
170000
13000
150000
110000
1900
2000
45000
510000
450000
Pyrene**
195
1520
ug/kg
71000
140000
1900
3400
100000
6800
99000
69000
1400
7600
38000
300000
280000
Total PAH17 ND=1/2RL
1610
22800
ug/kg
554600
1320600
14679
23700
1146200
88050
976000
677300
11462
34020
253300
3160500
3068000
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
ug/kg = Microgram per kilogram
ND =Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
RL = Reporting limit
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
J = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.
U = The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported
sample quantitation limit.
*TEC value based on USEPA Region 5 RCRA Ecological Screening Value (EPA 2003)
** Analytes inlcuded in Total 17 PAH calculations
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 5 of 9
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.25
TABLE 3-5 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PAHS
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
RB15-16
RB15-17
RB15-17
RB15-17
RB15-18
RB15-18
RB15-19
RB15-19
RB15-19
RBI 5-20
RBI 5-20
RBI 5-20
RBI 5-20
RBI 5-16-4060
RB15-17-SURF
RB15-17-0010
RB15-17-1030
RB15-18-SURF
RB15-18-0010
RB15-19-SURF
RB15-19-0010
RB15-19-1030
RB15-20-SURF
RBI 5-20-0010
RBI 5-20-1020
RBI 5-20-2040
11/4/2015
11/2/2015
11/3/2015
11/3/2015
11/1/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/3/2015
11/3/2015
11/4/2015
11/5/2015
11/5/2015
11/5/2015
De
pth Interval (ft):
4-6
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
0-1
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
0-1
1-2
2-4
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
1 -Methylnaphthalene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
3400
20
260 U
4.3
400 U
950 U
470 U
2100 U
5.8
500
3500
7100
600
2-Methyhiaphthalene**
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
3600
9.3 J
50 J
4.7
210 J
130 J
120 J
560 J
6.3
350 J
2800
5500
420
Acenaphthene**
6.71*
NSL
ug/kg
2600
120
610
8.6
720
550 J
390 J
2000 J
9.1
410 J
1300
2300
340
Acenaphthylene**
5.87*
NSL
ug/kg
1100 U
6.4 J
97 J
2.7 J
91 J
260 J
210 J
410 J
2.5 J
270 J
500 J
1100 J
96 J
Anthracene**
57.2
845
ug/kg
1200
40
1500
13
820
2200
670
3400
13
1000
2100
3500
310
Benzo(a)anthracene**
108
1050
ug/kg
620 J
84
1800
18
1700
4500
3400
9100
26
2600
4700
6500
490
Benzo(a)pyrene**
150
1450
ug/kg
490 J
76
1100
13
1600
4100
3000
6700
21
2500
3200
4700
360
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
10400*
NSL
ug/kg
200 J
59
850
15
1300
2800
1900
5700
22
2000
3300
4300
290
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene**
170*
NSL
ug/kg
250 J
69
580
10
760
2200
1600
3400
20
1300
1700
2400
200
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
240*
NSL
ug/kg
370 J
60
820
9.2
1000
2600
1900
5200
15
1900
2700
3600
270
Benzofelpyrene
150
1450
ug/kg
1100 U
61
750
16
1000
2600
2000
4500
19
1800
3000
4200
280
Cl-Chrysenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
1100 U
24 J
830 J
36 J
740 J
1700 J
1600 J
4300 J
29 J
2200 J
6400 J
9100 J
630 J
C 1-Fluoranthenes/pyrene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
1400 J
42 J
3700 J
60 J
3000 J
7000 J
6300 J
13000 J
54 J
5500 J
11000 J
19000 J
1600 J
Cl-Fluorenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
1100 U
15 U
430 J
22 J
400 U
950 U
470 U
2100 U
10 J
420 U
1700 J
2800 J
280 J
C 1-Naphthalenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
5000 J
15 U
260 U
7.2 J
400 U
950 U
470 U
2100 U
7.6 J
570 J
3900 J
7900 J
630 J
C 1-Phenanthrenes/ Anthracenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
1400 J
41 J
2800 J
110 J
1600 J
3100 J
1700 J
5200 J
55 J
3100 J
12000 J
21000 J
1600 J
C2-Chrysenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
1100 U
15 U
360 J
46 J
400 U
950 U
720 J
2100 U
22 J
1900 J
8100 J
7800 J
640 J
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
1100 U
15 U
1500 J
63 J
1200 J
2500 J
2300 J
6000 J
54 J
4100 J
11000 J
17000 J
1100 J
C2-Fluorenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
1100 U
15 U
440 J
38 J
400 U
950 U
470 U
2100 U
17 J
680 J
3500 J
5400 J
370 J
C2-Naphthalenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
3200 J
20 J
1100 J
51 J
1100 J
950 U
610 J
2300 J
29 J
2800 J
19000 J
36000 J
2700 J
C2-Phenanthrenes/ Anthracenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
1100 U
39 J
1500 J
130 J
850 J
1900 J
1300 J
2800 J
73 J
3600 J
18000 J
27000 J
1700 J
C3-Chrysenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
1100 U
15 U
260 U
33 J
400 U
950 U
470 U
2100 U
21 J
1200 J
5300 J
6600 J
340 J
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
1100 U
15 U
410 J
66 J
400 U
950 U
640 J
2100 U
37 J
2300 J
10000 J
15000 J
790 J
C3-Fluorenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
1100 U
15 U
260 U
55 J
400 U
950 U
470 U
2100 U
27 J
1100 J
5200 J
7600 J
450 J
C3-Naphthalenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
1200 J
33 J
1600 J
200 J
1100 J
1200 J
590 J
2400 J
84 J
3100 J
21000 J
35000 J
2700 J
C3-Phenanthrenes/ Anthracenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
1100 U
27 J
660 J
140 J
520 J
1000 J
760 J
2100 U
83 J
4900 J
22000 J
35000 J
1900 J
C4-Chrysenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
1100 U
15 U
260 U
17 J
400 U
950 U
470 U
2100 U
19 J
430 J
2400 J
3400 J
160 J
C4-Naphthalenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
1100 u
15 J
570 J
260 J
470 J
950 U
470 U
2100 U
100 J
2000 J
10000 J
16000 J
1300 J
C4-Phenanthrenes/ Anthracenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
1100 u
15 U
290 J
95 J
400 U
950 U
470 U
2100 U
63 J
3400 J
17000 J
26000 J
1300 J
Chrysene**
166
1290
ug/kg
600 J
94
1500
33
1500
3800
2900
7600
33
2800
6000
7900
530
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene "
33
NSL
ug/kg
1100 u
15
200 J
3.2 J
230 J
620 J
410 J
1300 J
3.9 J
490
690
870 J
73 J
Fluoranthene**
423
2230
ug/kg
1200
180
3300
27
3300
8500
4300
17000
42
4200
7600
11000
910
Fluorene**
77.4
536
ug/kg
1100
29
480
6.9
390 J
380 J
330 J
2200
10
410 J
1500
2300
240
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene **
200*
NSL
ug/kg
180 J
45
570
5.4
760
2000
1400
3700
9.6
1300
1700
2300
170
Naphthalene**
176
561
ug/kg
15000
9.8 J
87 J
3.4 J
480
190 J
160 J
1200 J
9.3
220 J
830
1800
180
Perylene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
1100U
29
280
9.6
400 U
1000
600
2100 U
12
590
800
1200 U
150 U
Phenanthrene
204
1170
ug/kg
3000
130
2700
42
2400
2900
1700
11000
28
2500
8200
13000
1100
Pyrene**
195
1520
ug/kg
1700
200
3800
39
3400
11000
6200
18000
42
4700
8600
14000
1300
Total PAH17 ND=1/2RL
1610
22800
ug/kg
33210
1226.5
20044
254.1
20661
48730
30590
98470
312.7
28840
57420
87070
7279
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
ug/kg = Microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
RL = Reporting limit
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
J = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.
U = The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported
sample quantitation limit.
*TEC value based on USEPA Region 5 RCRA Ecological Screening Value (EPA 2003)
** Analytes inlcuded in Total 17 PAH calculations
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 6 of 9
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.25
TABLE 3-5 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PAHS
Location ID:
RBI 5-21
RBI 5-21
RB15-21
RBI 5-22
RBI 5-22
RBI 5-22
RBI 5-22
RBI 5-22
RBI 5-23
RBI 5-23
RBI 5-23
RBI 5-23
RBI 5-23
Sample Name:
RB15-21-SURF
RB15-21-0010
RBI 5-21-1020
RB15-22-SURF
RBI 5-22-0010
RBI 5-22-1020
RBI 5-22-2030
RBI 5-22-3050
RB15-23-SURF
RBI 5-23-0010
RBI 5-23-1030
RBI 5-23-1030FD
RBI 5-23-3050
Sample Date:
11/4/2015
11/5/2015
11/5/2015
11/3/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/3/2015
11/5/2015
11/5/2015
11/5/2015
11/5/2015
De
pth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
1-2
0-0.5
0-1
1-2
2-3
3-5
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
1-3
3-5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
1 -Methylnaphthalene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
170 U
280 U
1000 u
250 U
860 U
830 U
2000 U
5000 U
270 U
4200
12000
13000
13000
2-Methyhiaphthalene**
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
74 J
82 J
470 J
90 J
320 J
260 J
710 J
1400 J
94 J
860 J
14000
15000
15000
Acenaphthene**
6.71*
NSL
ug/kg
180
200 J
610 J
140 J
540 J
620 J
3100
6200
150 J
4800
9300
9600
9700
Acenaphthylene**
5.87*
NSL
ug/kg
53 J
77 J
170 J
93 J
190 J
450 J
870 J
1800 J
56 J
1100 J
1800 J
1900 J
3100 J
Anthracene**
57.2
845
ug/kg
380
530
1600
430
980
1800
6800
13000
420
10000
15000
16000
21000
Benzo(a)anthracene**
108
1050
ug/kg
1000
1700
4200
1400
2900
5300
11000
28000
1300
14000
15000
17000
30000
Benzo(a)pyrene**
150
1450
ug/kg
770
1400
3300
1300
2600
5000
7400
22000
1100
9600
10000
12000
20000
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
10400*
NSL
ug/kg
720
1200
2300
1200
2200
3700
5400
13000
1100
5900
6800
7900
14000
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene**
170*
NSL
ug/kg
410
840
2100
780
1300
2300
3400
11000
640
4600
5400
5400
10000
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
240*
NSL
ug/kg
660
1300
2200
1000
2100
3500
5100
16000
920
6800
7000
7400
15000
Benzofelpyrene
150
1450
ug/kg
570
1100
3400
930
1900
3500
5500
16000
880
7200
7900
8700
15000
Cl-Chrysenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
450 J
830 J
6600 J
740 J
1300 J
3200 J
8700 J
20000 J
530 J
12000 J
14000 J
17000 J
23000 J
C 1-Fluoranthenes/pyrene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
1600 J
2200 J
15000 J
1800 J
4300 J
10000 J
23000 J
61000 J
1400 J
34000 J
43000 J
48000 J
75000 J
Cl-Fluorenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
170 U
280 U
1000 U
250 U
860 U
830 U
2100 J
5000 U
270 U
3300 J
5100 J
5500 J
6500 J
C 1-Naphthalenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
170 U
280 U
1000 U
250 U
860 U
830 U
2000 U
5000 U
270 U
3100 J
18000 J
18000 J
18000 J
C 1-Phenanthrenes/ Anthracenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
640 J
890 J
9600 J
670 J
2100 J
5800 J
17000 J
39000 J
460 J
29000 J
42000 J
44000 J
62000 J
C2-Chrysenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
320 J
700 J
7100 J
320 J
860 U
2400 J
3600 J
8200 J
270 U
6100 J
9600 J
9800 J
15000 J
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
800 J
1300 J
15000 J
940 J
1800 J
5300 J
11000 J
30000 J
720 J
16000 J
22000 J
26000 J
37000 J
C2-Fluorenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
170 U
280 U
2300 J
250 U
860 U
1300 J
2700 J
5000 J
270 U
3800 J
6500 J
7400 J
9000 J
C2-Naphthalenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
360 J
370 J
4800 J
330 J
1800 J
4300 J
12000 J
19000 J
270 J
18000 J
42000 J
45000 J
48000 J
C2-Phenanthrenes/ Anthracenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
430 J
680 J
12000 J
460 J
1700 J
6700 J
13000 J
28000 J
310 J
19000 J
33000 J
36000 J
47000 J
C3-Chrysenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
170 U
450 J
5900 J
250 U
860 U
1500 J
2100 J
5300 J
270 U
3500 J
4500 J
5200 J
6600 J
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
350 J
790 J
11000 J
320 J
860 U
3000 J
5300 J
9900 J
270 U
7700 J
13000 J
14000 J
16000 J
C3-Fluorenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
170 U
280 U
3100 J
250 U
860 U
1700 J
2800 J
5300 J
270 U
3300 J
7400 J
8500 J
10000 J
C3-Naphthalenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
380 J
380 J
7800 J
330 J
3300 J
8500 J
12000 J
22000 J
270 U
18000 J
36000 J
36000 J
39000 J
C3-Phenanthrenes/ Anthracenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
390 J
750 J
13000 J
340 J
1400 J
7900 J
12000 J
21000 J
270 U
13000 J
31000 J
36000 J
39000 J
C4-Chrysenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
170 U
280 U
4600 J
250 U
860 U
830 U
2000 U
5000 U
270 U
2500 U
3000 U
3000 U
6200 U
C4-Naphthalenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
180 J
280 U
4500 J
250 U
1400 J
4600 J
5700 J
9600 J
270 U
6900 J
15000 J
18000 J
20000 J
C4-Phenanthrenes/ Anthracenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
200 J
510 J
8700 J
250 U
860 U
4600 J
6700 J
11000 J
270 U
7200 J
19000 J
21000 J
22000 J
Chrysene**
166
1290
ug/kg
930
1600
4900
1400
2700
5000
9600
26000
1200
12000
15000
16000
27000
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene "
33
NSL
ug/kg
150 J
280
690 J
280
480 J
750 J
1300 J
4300 J
230 J
2000 J
2400 J
2300 J
4400 J
Fluoranthene**
423
2230
ug/kg
1900
3100
6400
2500
5400
8600
16000
41000
2400
21000
24000
25000
41000
Fluorene**
77.4
536
ug/kg
190
250 J
740 J
170 J
510 J
690 J
3000
5200
160 J
4500
8100
7900
7700
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene **
200*
NSL
ug/kg
420
800
1500
790
1300
2100
3200
9400
720
4000
4700
4700
9100
Naphthalene**
176
561
ug/kg
91 J
130 J
240 J
110 J
2000
590 J
600 J
1600 J
120 J
660 J
8100
8800
7900
Perylene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
210
400
1000 U
330
860 U
1100
2000 U
5000
340
2500 U
3000 U
3000 U
6200 U
Phenanthrene
204
1170
ug/kg
1100
1900
6200
1300
3700
5900
18000
37000
1200
25000
39000
40000
49000
Pyrene**
195
1520
ug/kg
2100
3200
9500
2400
5800
12000
20000
52000
2300
26000
32000
35000
53000
Total PAH17 ND=1/2RL
1610
22800
ug/kg
11082.5
18483
46765
15383
35020
58265
115180
288100
14110
152060
217600
231900
336900
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
ug/kg = Microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
RL = Reporting limit
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
J = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.
U = The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported
sample quantitation limit.
*TEC value based on USEPA Region 5 RCRA Ecological Screening Value (EPA 2003)
** Analytes inlcuded in Total 17 PAH calculations
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 7 of 9
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.25
TABLE 3-5 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PAHS
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
RBI 5-24
RBI 5-24
RBI 5-24
RBI 5-24
RBI 5-24
RBI 5-24
RBI 5-24
RBI 5-24
RBI 5-25
RBI 5-25
RBI 5-26
RBI 5-26
RBI 5-26
RBI 5-26
RB15-24-SURF
RBI 5-24-0010
RBI 5-24-1020
RBI 5-24-2040
RB 15-24-2040FD
RBI 5-24-4050
RBI 5-24-5060
RBI 5-24-6080
RB15-25-SURF
RB15-25-0010
RB15-26-SURF
RBI 5-26-0010
RBI 5-26-1030
RBI 5-26-1030FD
11/4/2015
11/5/2015
11/5/2015
11/5/2015
11/5/2015
11/5/2015
11/5/2015
11/5/2015
11/4/2015
11/5/2015
11/3/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
De
pth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
1-2
2-4
2-4
4-5
5-6
6-8
0-0.5
0-1
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
1-3
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
1 -Methylnaphthalene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
110U
590 U
7400
40000
37000
28000
1600
80
4.2 U
4 U
38 U
17 U
4 U
4 U
2-Methyhiaphthalene**
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
47 J
320 J
2000 J
29000
29000
35000
1400
87
4.2 U
4 U
32 J
16 J
4 U
4 U
Acenaphthene**
6.71*
NSL
ug/kg
77 J
1000
13000
31000
28000
23000
2100
89
4.2 U
5.5
47
7.9 J
4 U
4 U
Acenaphthylene**
5.87*
NSL
ug/kg
46 J
360 J
1500 J
2600 J
2300 J
2100 J
290 J
10 J
4.2 U
0.96 J
26 J
1.7 J
4 U
4 U
Anthracene**
57.2
845
ug/kg
190
1400
13000
33000
30000
31000
3100
100
4.2 U
5.2
110
7.9 J
4 U
4 U
Benzo(a)anthracene**
108
1050
ug/kg
650
4200
15000
26000
24000
26000
4400
120
4.2 U
6.7
230
11 J
4 U
5.6
Benzo(a)pyrene**
150
1450
ug/kg
640
3800
12000
19000
16000
18000
3500
90
4.2 U
4.2
200
8.5 J
4 U
4 U
B enzo(b)fluoranthene
10400*
NSL
ug/kg
580
2500
6900
12000
9500
10000 J
2000
53
4.2 U
4.8
120
8.1 J
4.2
5.2
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene**
170*
NSL
ug/kg
410
2000
6600
8600
7600
8600 J
1600
54
4.2 U
4 U
84
17 U
4.7 U
5.6 U
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
240*
NSL
ug/kg
590
2900
8600
12000
11000
14000
2600
64
4.2 U
5.1
120
5.8 J
4 U
4 U
Benzofelpyrene
150
1450
ug/kg
510
2600
8000
12000
11000
12000
2100
62
4.2 U
4.2
130
17 U
4.6
5.9
Cl-Chrysenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
330 J
2100 J
9400 J
20000 J
18000 J
17000 J
2600 J
76 J
4.2 U
5.6 J
170 J
17 U
9.2 J
12 J
CI -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
950 J
7600 J
39000 J
76000 J
64000 J
61000 J
9000 J
270 J
7 J
16 J
530 J
28 J
16 J
21 J
Cl-Fluorenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
110U
590 U
4300 J
11000 J
12000 J
11000U
890 J
41 U
4.2 U
4 U
50 J
17 U
4 U
4 U
CI -Naphthalenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
110U
590 U
5600 J
44000 J
41000 J
40000 J
2000 J
110 J
4.2 U
4.2 J
38 U
17 J
4 U
4.7 J
CI -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
360 J
3600 J
29000 J
66000 J
65000 J
55000 J
5800 J
210 J
4.2 J
13 J
240 J
17 J
8 J
11 J
C2-Chrysenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
200 J
1200 J
6200 J
10000 J
8900 J
11000U
960 J
41 U
4.2 U
4 U
68 J
17 U
11 J
9 J
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
480 J
3200 J
16000 J
31000 J
28000 J
23000 J
3600 J
120 J
5.8 J
10 J
220 J
23 J
18 J
22 J
C2-Fluorenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
110U
590 U
4400 J
9800 J
8500 J
11000U
850 J
41 U
4.2 U
4 U
38 U
17 U
4 U
4 U
C2-Naphthalenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
210 J
2000 J
33000 J
110000 J
99000 J
71000 J
4600 J
220 J
4.2 U
16 J
120 J
21 J
6.6 J
12 J
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
320 J
2700 J
20000 J
39000 J
41000 J
30000 J
3900 J
130 J
6.1 J
12 J
170 J
20 J
14 J
17 J
C3-Chrysenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
110U
590 U
3000 U
7000 J
6100 J
11000U
780 U
41 U
4.2 U
4 U
38 U
17 U
7.2 J
10 J
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
260 J
1300 J
7300 J
14000 J
12000 J
11000U
1400 J
56 J
4.8 J
7.7 J
65 J
18 J
17 J
19 J
C3-Fluorenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
110U
590 U
3700 J
8000 J
7600 J
11000U
780 U
41 U
4.2 U
4 U
38 U
17 U
4.9 J
5.5 J
C3-Naphthalenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
280 J
2300 J
25000 J
65000 J
59000 J
43000 J
3300 J
150 J
6.8 J
17 J
130 J
22 J
13 J
19 J
C3-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
320 J
2500 J
18000 J
35000 J
29000 J
21000 J
2100 J
100 J
9.9 J
15 J
110 J
28 J
25 J
29 J
C4-Chrysenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
110U
590 U
3000 U
6000 U
5800 U
11000U
780 U
41 U
4.2 U
4 U
38 U
17 U
4.6 J
4.8 J
C4-Naphthalenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
180 J
1100 J
9400 J
18000 J
18000 J
12000 J
1100 J
55 J
7 J
11 J
49 J
20 J
19 J
22 J
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
210 J
1500 J
11000 J
22000 J
18000 J
11000U
860 J
58 J
7.3 J
10 J
50 J
21 J
22 J
25 J
Chrysene**
166
1290
ug/kg
710
3900
14000
23000
21000
23000
4000
110
4.2 U
8.7
200
14 J
7.7
10
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene**
33
NSL
ug/kg
140
610
2100 J
2900 J
2600 J
2900 J
510 J
14 J
4.2 U
0.96 J
32 J
2 J
4 U
4 U
Fluoranthene**
423
2230
ug/kg
1200
6600
25000
44000
44000
47000
7700
180
5.1 U
16
340
20
4 U
8.4
Fluorene**
77.4
536
ug/kg
87 J
870
8200
22000
20000
20000
1500
62
4.2 U
4.1
37 J
8.1 J
4 U
4 U
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene**
200*
NSL
ug/kg
400
1800
5700
7500
6600
7600 J
1400
39 J
4.2 U
2.5 J
84
4.4 J
4 U
4 U
Naphthalene**
176
561
ug/kg
68 J
460 J
1900 J
5900 J
5600 J
20000
1300
75
11U
5 U
52
130
5.3 U
12 U
Perylene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
190
860
3000 U
6000 U
5800 U
11000U
780 U
41 U
4.2 U
4 U
44
17 U
7.4
8.2
Phenanthrene
204
1170
ug/kg
580
4800
35000
83000
77000
78000
6500
260
5.8 U
18
200
28
4 U
12
Pyrene**
195
1520
ug/kg
1200
8900
39000
70000
58000
62000
8300
280
6.8 U
17
500
24
6.5 U
12
Total PAH17 ND=1/2RL
1610
22800
ug/kg
7581
46030
207550
428550
389400
423900
52200
1687
64.75
106.22
2414
305.9
64.15
98
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
ug/kg = Microgram per kilogram
ND =Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
RL = Reporting limit
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
J = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.
U = The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported
sample quantitation limit.
*TEC value based on USEPA Region 5 RCRA Ecological Screening Value (EPA 2003)
** Analytes inlcuded in Total 17 PAH calculations
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 8 of 9
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
EA Project No.: 62561.25
TABLE 3-5 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR PAHS
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
RBI 5-26
RBI 5-27
RBI 5-27
RBI 5-27
RBI 5-27
RBI 5-27
RBI 5-27
RBI 5-28
RBI 5-28
RBI 5-28
RBI 5-26-3050
RB15-27-SURF
RBI 5-27-0010
RBI 5-27-1030
RBI 5-27-3050
RBI 5-27-5065
RBI 5-27-6570
RB15-28-SURF
RB15-28-0010
RBI 5-28-1030
11/4/2015
10/26/2015
10/28/2015
10/28/2015
10/28/2015
10/28/2015
10/28/2015
10/26/2015
10/28/2015
10/28/2015
De
pth Interval (ft):
3-5
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-5
5-6.5
6.5-7
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
1 -Methylnaphthalene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
3.9 U
42000 U
2200 U
19000
34000
89000
1200
1900
1400 U
97
2-Methyhiaphthalene**
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
2.9 J
42000 U
430 J
27000
51000
150000
1800
390 J
320 J
27 J
Acenaphthene**
6.71*
NSL
ug/kg
1.7 J
66000
7700
30000
56000
42000 J
520 J
4800
1400
64
Acenaphthylene**
5.87*
NSL
ug/kg
0.34 J
11000 J
910 J
1800 J
2900 J
78000
1200
460 J
1100 J
67
Anthracene**
57.2
845
ug/kg
1.4 J
120000
7700
23000
57000
140000
1300
2300
4300
150
Benzo(a)anthracene**
108
1050
ug/kg
3.9 U
130000
13000
23000
43000
91000
600 J
4400
4100
140
Benzo(a)pyrene**
150
1450
ug/kg
1.4 J
100000
11000
18000
34000
59000
370 J
4000
3300
110
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
10400*
NSL
ug/kg
1.5 J
85000
9800
13000
19000 J
38000 J
300 J
3700
2600
90
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene**
170*
NSL
ug/kg
2.4 J
41000 J
4800
7300
13000 J
22000 J
180 J
2000
1500
64
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
240*
NSL
ug/kg
0.87 J
96000
7800
12000
23000
51000
320 J
2900
2600
68
Benzofelpyrene
150
1450
ug/kg
3.9 U
63000
6800
11000
21000 U
51000U
640 U
2700
2100
77
Cl-Chrysenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
3.9 U
42000 U
4100 J
14000 J
21000 U
51000U
640 U
1800 J
1500 J
85 J
C 1-Fluoranthenes/pyrene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
6.8 J
180000 J
20000 J
52000 J
97000 J
200000 J
1400 J
6900 J
7100 J
340 J
Cl-Fluorenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
3.9 U
42000 U
2200 U
7000 J
21000 U
51000U
640 U
780 U
1400 U
61 J
C 1-Naphthalenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
3.9 U
42000 U
2200 U
33000 J
60000 J
170000 J
2100 J
1600 J
1400 U
85 J
C 1-Phenanthrenes/ Anthracenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
3.9 J
76000 J
8400 J
48000 J
77000 J
140000 J
1200 J
3200 J
4400 J
310 J
C2-Chrysenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
3.9 U
42000 U
2200 U
8100 J
21000 U
51000U
640 U
880 J
1400 U
64 J
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
6.5 J
45000 J
6300 J
22000 J
30000 J
72000 J
660 J
2500 J
2700 J
180 J
C2-Fluorenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
3.9 U
42000 U
2200 U
7000 U
21000 U
51000U
640 U
780 U
1400 U
56 J
C2-Naphthalenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
5.4 J
42000 U
3700 J
65000 J
97000 J
200000 J
3200 J
3300 J
5300 J
420 J
C2-Phenanthrenes/ Anthracenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
5.5 J
42000 U
4400 J
29000 J
28000 J
61000 J
640 U
1700 J
2100 J
210 J
C3-Chrysenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
3.9 U
42000 U
2200 U
7000 U
21000 U
51000U
640 U
780 U
1400 U
56 J
C3-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
6.4 J
42000 U
2200 U
7900 J
21000 U
51000U
640 U
820 J
1400 U
96 J
C3-Fluorenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
3.9 U
42000 U
2200 U
7000 U
21000 U
51000U
640 U
780 U
1400 U
43 J
C3-Naphthalenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
5.8 J
42000 U
3400 J
36000 J
40000 J
99000 J
1700 J
2000 J
3700 J
510 J
C3-Phenanthrenes/ Anthracenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
8.8 J
42000 U
2900 J
20000 J
21000 U
51000U
640 U
1100 J
1400 J
190 J
C4-Chrysenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
3.9 U
42000 U
2200 U
7000 U
21000 U
51000U
640 U
780 U
1400 U
33 U
C4-Naphthalenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
6 J
42000 U
2200 U
12000 J
21000 U
51000U
640 U
780 U
1400 U
320 J
C4-Phenanthrenes/ Anthracenes
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
7.8 J
42000 U
2200 U
9000 J
21000 U
51000U
640 U
780 U
1400 U
120 J
Chrysene**
166
1290
ug/kg
3.2 J
120000
11000
20000
37000
80000
550 J
4000
3800
130
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene "
33
NSL
ug/kg
0.29 J
13000 J
1800 J
2100 J
3800 J
7800 J
54 J
660 J
440 J
20 J
Fluoranthene**
423
2230
ug/kg
3.9 U
330000
27000
48000
95000
190000
1200
6700
9000
290
Fluorene**
77.4
536
ug/kg
1 J
72000
5100
22000
44000
120000
1300
1100
2500
140
Indeno( 1,2,3-cd)pyrene **
200*
NSL
ug/kg
3.9 U
42000
4700
6600 J
12000 J
22000 J
150 J
1800
1500
47
Naphthalene**
176
561
ug/kg
5.4
42000 U
1900 J
55000
92000
380000
6900
2100
1600
84
Perylene
NSL
NSL
ug/kg
3.9 U
42000 U
2800
7000 U
21000 U
51000U
640 U
1000
1400 U
33 U
Phenanthrene
204
1170
ug/kg
4.3
370000
21000
83000
190000
350000
3200
9700
12000
530
Pyrene**
195
1520
ug/kg
4.4
200000
19000
41000
95000
140000
880
5500
6500
260
Total PAH17 ND=1/2RL
1610
22800
ug/kg
42.8
1880000
154640
432800
867700
1960800
20824
56510
58560
2281
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
FD = Field Duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
ug/kg = Microgram per kilogram
ND = Non-detect
NSL = No Screening Level
PAH = Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
RL = Reporting limit
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
J = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.
U = The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported
sample quantitation limit.
*TEC value based on USEPA Region 5 RCRA Ecological Screening Value (EPA 2003)
** Analytes inlcuded in Total 17 PAH calculations
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 9 of 9
Site Characterization Report
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-6 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-01
RB15-01
RB15-01
RB15-01
RB15-02
RB15-02
RB15-02
RB15-02
RB15-02
Sample Name:
RB15-01-SURF
RB15-01-0010
RB15-01-1030
RB15-01-3050
RB15-02-SURF
RB15-02-SURFFD
RB15-02-0010
RB15-02-1030
RB15-02-3040
Sample Date:
10/30/2015
11/3/2015
11/3/2015
11/3/2015
10/31/2015
10/31/2015
11/3/2015
11/3/2015
11/3/2015
Depth
nterval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-4
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
8.6 J
9.3
9.9
8.6
4.1 J
2.7 J
3.9
10
6.2
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
86.3 J
105 J
170 J
179 J
143 J
70.6 J
209 J
288 J
50 J
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
0.91 J
1.7
6.6
6.4
1.3
0.68
6.9
9.6
0.17 J
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
38.8 J
50.4 J
107 J
145 J
46.8 J
47.4 J
88.9 J
77 J
17.3 J
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
56 J
72.7
129
165
85.9 J
60.1 J
221
312
20.1
Iron
20000(a)
40000(a)
mg/kg
22700
22900
26500
22200
11800
11000
9670
13900
19000
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
62.9
104 J
265 J
387 J
169
81.8
454 J
675 J
20.5 J
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
1.5
0.51
0.9
0.88
0.68
0.72
1.9
2.8
0.062 J
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
35.9 J
39.4
73.9
89.5
27.2 J
16.9 J
38.7
59.8
22.5
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
1.4 J
1.7 J
2 J
1.6 J
0.44 J
3.6 U
0.58 J
1.1 J
3.2 U
Silver
1.6(a)
2.2(a)
mg/kg
0.34 J
2.9 J
6.2 J
5.7 J
2.3
2.8
4.7 J
4.3 J
0.16 J
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
207 J
329
688
700
210 J
170 J
443
749
55
Total organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
39200
36900 J
53900 J
60800 J
13400
8930
69500 J
61000 J
12200 J
Moisture Content
NSL
NSL
0/
/O
131
105
118
95.3
39.2
39.8
32.9
63.6
19.9
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed the TEC
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed the PEC
FD = Field Duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
NSL = No Screening Level
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000)
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000)
J = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.
J + = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
U = The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported
sample quantitation limit.
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan Page 1 of 13
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-6 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-03
RB15-03
RB15-03
RB15-03
RB15-03
RB15-04
RB15-04
RB15-04
RB15-04
Sample Name:
RB15-03-SURF
RB15-03-0010
RB15-03-1030
RB15-03-3050
RB15-03-5070
RB15-04-SURF
RB15-04-0010
RB15-04-1030
RB15-04-1030FD
Sample Date:
10/31/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
10/31/2015
11/3/2015
11/3/2015
11/3/2015
Depth
nterval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-5
5-7
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
1-3
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
7.5 J
13 J
13.5 J
20.6 J
7.3 J
5.1 J
10.4
3.2
4
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
63.5 J
321 J
495 J
419 J
67.3 J
343 J
254 J
72 J
27.3 J
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
1.4
18 J
56.3 J
5.8 J
0.19 J
3.4
3.4
0.18 J
0.43 J
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
24.8 J
141 J
289 J
77.6 J
17 J
141 J
272 J
10.6 J
6.4 J
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
40.2 J
257
435
432
22.6
491 J
677
47
30.1
Iron
20000(a)
40000(a)
mg/kg
16300
22600
27400
22600
19600
11100
14700
7040
5280
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
46.2
451 J
599 J
967 J
27 J
1050
899 J
231 J
130 J
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
0.18 J
2.5
6.7
7.1
0.23
1.1
2.6
3.3 J
0.64 J
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
27 J
65.2 J
127 J
54.6 J
23.6 J
32.6 J
159
9.7
17.1
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
1 J
2.3 J
2.1 J
1.8 J
0.86 J
0.62 J
1.7 J
0.33 J
0.97 J
Silver
1.6(a)
2.2(a)
mg/kg
0.35 J
5
11.2
6.3
0.19 J
15.4
23.4 J
0.15 J
0.97 U
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
131 J
723 J
1250 J
1440 J
71 J
425 J
843
78.7
65.3
Total organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
37600
86500
121000
70800
11900
16900
62400 J
18400 J
30300 J
Moisture Content
NSL
NSL
0/
/O
122
85.6
92.2
75.1
22.3
38.6
44.6
31.7
29.8
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed the TEC
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed the PEC
FD = Field Duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
NSL = No Screening Level
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000)
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000)
J = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.
J + = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
U = The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported
sample quantitation limit.
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 2 of 13
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-6 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-04
RB15-05
RB15-05
RB15-05
RB15-06
RB15-06
RB15-06
RB15-07
RB15-07
Sample Name:
RB15-04-3040
RB15-05-SURF
RB15-05-0010
RB15-05-1030
RB15-06-SURF
RB15-06-0010
RB15-06-1030
RB15-07-SURF
RB15-07-0010
Sample Date:
11/3/2015
10/31/2015
11/3/2015
11/3/2015
10/31/2015
11/3/2015
11/3/2015
11/1/2015
11/2/2015
Depth
nterval (ft):
3-4
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
0-1
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
5.4
3.5 J
6.7
5.8
4.2 J
8.9
13.1
4.6 J
5.3 J
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
37.3 J
65.9 J
62.5 J
53.4 J
47.4 J
74.6 J
71.9 J
50.4 J
47.5 J
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
0.14 J
0.24 J
0.43 J
0.17 J
3.5
0.29 J
0.33 J
0.37 J
0.66
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
16.4 J
10.2 J
20.6 J
17.8 J
27.1 J
27.2 J
20.2 J
24.1 J
44.6 J
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
15
14.7 J
22
15.1
43.5 J
28.7
21
20.8 J
35.9 J
Iron
20000(a)
40000(a)
mg/kg
18200
7480
17800
17800
12300
24800
23000
8710
22700
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
9.9 J
151
111 J
9.5 J
128
18.7 J
10.1 J
49
237
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
0.11 U
0.08 J
0.11 u
0.12 U
2.8
0.13 U
0.12 U
0.1 J
0.14
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
21.6
9.6 J
23
23.3
19.4 J
40.7
31.9
11 J
27.9 J
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
3 U
4.4 U
0.93 J
0.48 J
0.63 J
0.59 J
0.92 J
4 U
1.1 J
Silver
1.6(a)
2.2(a)
mg/kg
0.85 U
0.22 J
0.21 J
1 U
1.1 J
0.17 J
0.96 U
0.2 J
0.4 J
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
50
66.8 J
80.9
42.8
110 J
71
60.8
64.9 J
102 J
Total organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
17000 J
17000
13100 J
7780 J
17400
26800 J
9950 J
15300
53200
Moisture Content
NSL
NSL
0/
/O
19.8
31.5
26
22.4
70.5
40
28.2
30.6
28.7
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed the TEC
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed the PEC
FD = Field Duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
NSL = No Screening Level
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000)
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000)
J = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.
J + = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
U = The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported
sample quantitation limit.
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 3 of 13
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-6 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-07
RB15-07
RB15-08
RB15-08
RB15-08
RB15-09
RB15-09
RB15-09
Sample Name:
RB15-07-1020
RB15-07-2030
RB15-08-SURF
RB15-08-SURFFD
RB15-08-0010
RB15-09-SURF
RB15-09-SURFFD
RB15-09-0010
Sample Date:
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/1/2015
11/1/2015
11/2/2015
11/1/2015
11/1/2015
11/2/2015
Depth
nterval (ft):
1-2
2-3
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-1
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-1
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
5 J
6 J
17.8 J
5.6 J
7.3 J
6.6 J
4.7 J
11.9 J
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
33.2 J
72.8 J
21.9 J
30.9 J
137 J
56.2 J
44.8 J
38.1 J
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
0.36 J
0.041 J
0.11 J
0.29 J
0.079 J
0.73 J
0.73
0.21 J
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
21 J
15.7 J
14.1 J
25.3 J
15.2 J
33.9 J
29.1 J
16.1 J
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
29.1 J
19.2
66.6 J
49.6 J
20.5
77.9 J
42.8 J
24.8
Iron
20000(a)
40000(a)
mg/kg
17000
19300
28600
15600
17900
17900
13900
17100
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
62.5
9.5 J
60.7
151
17.8 J
85.8
74.6
36.4 J
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
0.57
0.11 U
0.1 J
0.11 J
0.29
0.39
0.19
0.1 J
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
22.3 J
28.8 J
12.7 J
16.5 J
24.6 J
22.9 J
24.2 J
22.1 J
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
1.2 J
3.4 U
0.88 J
0.6 J
3.8 U
6.3 U
4.7 U
3.8 U
Silver
1.6(a)
2.2(a)
mg/kg
0.25 J
0.12 J
0.27 J
0.33 J
0.17 J
0.52 J
4.3
0.3 J
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
95.1 J
50 J
75.1 J
87.3 J
61.7 J
153 J
133 J
65.8 J
Total organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
146000
13100
8540
12700
11300
23900
31000
6860
Moisture Content
NSL
NSL
0/
/O
29.3
29.5
29.5
27
26.1
69.2
79.5
17.5
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed the TEC
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed the PEC
FD = Field Duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
NSL = No Screening Level
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000)
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000)
J = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.
J + = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
U = The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported
sample quantitation limit.
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 4 of 13
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-6 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-10
RB15-10
RB15-11
RB15-11
RB15-11
RB15-11
RB15-12
RB15-12
RB15-13
Sample Name:
RB15-10-SURF
RB15-10-0010
RB15-11-SURF
RB15-11-0010
RB15-11-1030
RB15-11-1030FD
RB15-12-0010
RB15-12-1030
RB15-13-SURF
Sample Date:
11/1/2015
11/2/2015
11/3/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/2/2015
Depth
nterval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
1-3
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
6.1 J
3.2 J
12.2
7
5.5
7.4
8.3
14.3
4.9 J
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
38.6 J
26.9 J
51.1
145
134
134
92.3
151
63.7 J
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
0.24 J
0.11 J
0.79 J
0.049 J
0.6 U
0.61 U
0.67
1.2
1.3 J
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
12.9 J
16.5 J
40
47.7 J
30.4 J
30.5 J
162 J
28.3 J
29.6 J
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
23.2 J
14.8
101
38.5
21.9
24.7
42.4
186
57.7
Iron
20000(a)
40000(a)
mg/kg
18400
6140
18900
34200
26500
29700
32500
15100
12600
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
29.8
49.4 J
221
17.5
10.2
11.5
126
400
91.2 J
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
0.12
0.56
0.1 J
0.13 U
0.12 U
0.15 U
0.38 J+
5.3 J+
0.19
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
11.8 J
6.7 J
23.9
44.6 J
35 J
36.8 J
15.2 J
14.3 J
16.5 J
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
4.4 U
0.54 J
1.1 J
1.5 J
1.2 J
0.76 J
1.8 J
3 J
0.62 J
Silver
1.6(a)
2.2(a)
mg/kg
0.47 J
0.083 J
0.21 J
1.2 UJ
1.2 UJ
1.2 UJ
0.55 J
1.1 J
0.53 J
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
63.1 J
46.4 J
211
75.3
63
69.2
134
492
180 J
Total organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
48600
22900
47100
9820
16300
12500
60500
409000
44200
Moisture Content
NSL
NSL
0/
/O
50.8
35.8
106
42.6
46
36.3
26.6
53.5
36.5
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed the TEC
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed the PEC
FD = Field Duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
NSL = No Screening Level
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000)
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000)
J = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.
J + = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
U = The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported
sample quantitation limit.
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 5 of 13
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-6 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-13
RB15-13
RB15-13
RB15-13
RB15-14
RB15-14
RB15-14
RB15-14
RB15-15
Sample Name:
RB15-13-0010
RB15-13-1025
RB15-13-2535
RB15-13-3550
RB15-14-SURF
RB15-14-0010
RB15-14-1030
RB15-14-3050
RB15-15-SURF
Sample Date:
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/2/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/2/2015
Depth
nterval (ft):
0-1
1-2.5
2.5-3.5
3.5-5
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-5
0-0.5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
7
9.8
9.8
9
5.8
14.5
10.9
6.1
3.9
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
543
348
198
76.2
99.1 J
234
174
61.6
101 J
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
2.4
4.9
4.6
0.16 J
0.83
0.99
1.7
0.035 J
0.66
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
50.7
73.4
63.7
21.2 J
53.5 J
34.7 J
26.1 J
17.3
36.8 J
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
124
126
124
24.5
77.1
214
115
16.1
49.8
Iron
20000(a)
40000(a)
mg/kg
16900
17800
19900
26000
18400
50600
27900
19000
15100
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
395
675
434
18.6
179 J
736
437
25
126 J
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
0.47
1.00
1.00
0.12 U
0.55
0.54
3
0.037 J
0.2
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
37.2
52.4
42.9
33.4 J
20.6
24.7 J
17.5 J
22.6
18.7
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
0.79 J
1 J
1.4 J
1.5 J
0.55 J
1.9 J
2.2 J
1.3 J
0.6 J
Silver
1.6(a)
2.2(a)
mg/kg
1.6
1.7
1.4
1.2 UJ
0.39 J
0.69 J
1.1 J
0.88 U
0.35 J
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
837
859
552
68
304
390
549
53
206
Total organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
82500
109000
183000
8640
19400 J
58400
87300
32800
41900 J
Moisture Content
NSL
NSL
0/
/O
33.1
50.2
56.6
28.5
52.1
31.7
44.6
27.5
48.6
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed the TEC
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed the PEC
FD = Field Duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
NSL = No Screening Level
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000)
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000)
J = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.
J + = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
U = The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported
sample quantitation limit.
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 6 of 13
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-6 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-15
RB15-15
RB15-15
RB15-15
RB15-15
RB15-16
RB15-16
RB15-16
RB15-16
Sample Name:
RB15-15-0010
RB15-15-1020
RB15-15-2040
RB15-15-2040FD
RB15-15-4060
RB15-16-SURF
RB15-16-0010
RB15-16-1030
RB15-16-3040
Sample Date:
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/2/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
Depth
nterval (ft):
0-1
1-2
2-4
2-4
4-6
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-4
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
10.3
7.4
7.9
6
6.4
6 J
6.7
13.1
1
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
145
48
71.9
118
69
85.3 J
117
135
94.8
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
1.7
0.067 J
0.38 J
0.35 J
0.038 J
0.58 J
0.77
1.3
0.69
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
30.4
17.2
14.3
12.6
19.6
61.6 J
22.4
27
20.8
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
165
18.2
87.2
73.7
19.6
47.3
89.4
245
115
Iron
20000(a)
40000(a)
mg/kg
18000
20000
12300
12700
21300
20500
22400
18300
15000
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
380
18.8
218
204
11
96.6 J
259
394
242
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
1.7
0.038 J
2.7
1.00
0.13 U
0.12 J
0.48
2.1
2.3
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
25.3
22.9
11.6
10.6
26.2
21.5 J
20.9
21.4
19.4
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
1.1 J
0.79 J
0.79 J
1 J
1.7 J
0.55 J
1.3 J
1.2 J
1.2 J
Silver
1.6(a)
2.2(a)
mg/kg
4.4
1.1 U
0.49 J
0.38 J
1.2 U
0.28 J
0.31 J
0.8 J
0.71 J
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
445
60.1
302
254
53.6
229 J
259
523
278
Total organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
59300
19400
42100
47100
17500
45600
61600
69600
77600
Moisture Content
NSL
NSL
0/
/O
50.2
20.2
29.9
32.4
25.3
88.4
28.9
42.1
38.4
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed the TEC
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed the PEC
FD = Field Duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
NSL = No Screening Level
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000)
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000)
J = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.
J + = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
U = The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported
sample quantitation limit.
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 7 of 13
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-6 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-16
RB15-17
RB15-17
RB15-17
RB15-18
RB15-18
RB15-19
RB15-19
RB15-19
Sample Name:
RB15-16-4060
RB15-17-SURF
RB15-17-0010
RB15-17-1030
RB15-18-SURF
RB15-18-0010
RB15-19-SURF
RB15-19-0010
RB15-19-1030
Sample Date:
11/4/2015
11/2/2015
11/3/2015
11/3/2015
11/1/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/3/2015
11/3/2015
Depth
nterval (ft):
4-6
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
0-0.5
0-1
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
6.5
5.8
8
6.3
5.9 J
6.4 J
4.9
5.5
5.5
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
103
64.8 J
36.3 J
65.3 J
47.6 J
41.7 J
59.4 J
79.7
73
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
0.074 J
0.21 J
0.34 J
0.16 J
0.11 J
0.35 J
0.9
1.6
0.53 U
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
25.5
22.9 J
13.6 J
15.9 J
33 J
15.5 J
34 J
48.6
18.5
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
21.5
21.2
21.9
20.1
5250 J
67.1
154
315
21.1
Iron
20000(a)
40000(a)
mg/kg
27100
21600
14700
18600
15200
11300
15800
12200
19800
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
13.8
12.3 J
17.1 J
9.3 J
54.5
128 J
141 J
135
9.2
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
0.13 U
0.13 U
0.11 U
0.038 J
0.055 J
0.13
16.5
0.18
0.11 U
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
32.4
28.1
20.1
25.9
19 J
15.1 J
32.9
40.9
23.8
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
1.3 J
4.2 U
0.33 J
3.7 U
0.57 J
0.33 J
0.52 J
0.6 J
1.1 J
Silver
1.6(a)
2.2(a)
mg/kg
1.2 U
0.15 J
0.92 U
1.1 U
1.2
0.21 J
0.57 J
0.43 J
1.1 U
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
74.3
60.2
70.2
49.5
67.7 J
138 J
303
286
51.8
Total organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
19900
14100 J
13800 J
16100 J
12400
32400
12700 J
27900
26200
Moisture Content
NSL
NSL
0/
/O
27.7
37.6
14.2
19.7
17.6
20.8
29
21
31.8
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed the TEC
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed the PEC
FD = Field Duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
NSL = No Screening Level
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000)
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000)
J = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.
J + = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
U = The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported
sample quantitation limit.
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 8 of 13
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-6 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-20
RB15-20
RB15-20
RB15-20
RB15-21
RB15-21
RB15-21
RB15-22
RB15-22
Sample Name:
RB15-20-SURF
RB15-20-0010
RB15-20-1020
RB15-20-2040
RB15-21-SURF
RB15-21-0010
RB15-21-1020
RB15-22-SURF
RB15-22-0010
Sample Date:
11/4/2015
11/5/2015
11/5/2015
11/5/2015
11/4/2015
11/5/2015
11/5/2015
11/3/2015
11/4/2015
Depth
nterval (ft):
0-0.5
0-0.5
1-2
2-4
0-0.5
0-1
1-2
0-0.5
0-1
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
11.9
14.7
17.6
11.2
4.6
7.6
6.8
5.2
6
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
135
337
464
117
34.1
136
140
107
155
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
2.8
21.1
42.6
2.7
0.54 J
0.89
5.5
0.92 J
1.9
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
94.5 J
557
683
36.9
20.4 J
51.5
151
36.8
134 J
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
511
2340
6100
314
108
355
1210
83.2
300
Iron
20000(a)
40000(a)
mg/kg
24300
26400
25800
23900
8900
13100
16600
16200
25500
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
144
472
858
56.3
60.6
275
289
55
235
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
0.34 J+
2
3.9
0.24
0.18 J+
0.24
0.77
0.19 J
0.2 J+
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
43.7 J
58.2
108
37.5
15.2 J
24.3
32.5
31.4
80.9 J
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
3.4 J
3.8 J
6.6
1.1 J
0.61 J
0.84 J
4.2
1.6 J
1.1 J
Silver
1.6(a)
2.2(a)
mg/kg
0.94 J
6
9.2
0.27 J
0.21 J
0.17 J
0.85 J
1.5 J
1 J
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
1250
3270
14500
739
176
524
3360
187
511
Total organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
51800
77200
123000
18200
11000
22900
84500
40000
25100
Moisture Content
NSL
NSL
0/
/O
136
109
86.8
33.3
34.5
25.5
29.8
95.1
25.4
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed the TEC
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed the PEC
FD = Field Duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
NSL = No Screening Level
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000)
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000)
J = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.
J + = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
U = The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported
sample quantitation limit.
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 9 of 13
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-6 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB 15-22
RB15-22
RB 15-22
RB15-23
RB15-23
RB15-23
RB15-23
RB15-23
RB15-24
Sample Name:
RB15-22-1020
RB 15-22-2030
RB15-22-3050
RB15-23-SURF
RB15-23-0010
RB15-23-1030
RB15-23-1030FD
RB15-23-3050
RB15-24-SURF
Sample Date:
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/3/2015
11/5/2015
11/5/2015
11/5/2015
11/5/2015
11/4/2015
Depth
nterval (ft):
1-2
2-3
3-5
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
1-3
3-5
0-0.5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
7.8
8.9
10
5.9
12.4
13.2
14.3
12.7
8.3
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
196
289
391
48.3
299
450
424
467
76.1
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
3.2
28
8.8
0.4 J
13.2
49.3
46.7
41.9
0.98 J
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
210 J
206 J
91.5 J
21
127
333
302
278
32.7 J
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
557
1540
1030
65.5
579
1190
1260
1170
48.2
Iron
20000(a)
40000(a)
mg/kg
12800
16100
15900
17700
21100
28100
27300
28200
23600
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
327
408
405
36
419
529
535
604
49.8
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
0.29 J+
1.7 J+
4.9 J+
0.095 J
2.3
4.7
4
9.2
0.16 J+
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
122 J
97.9 J
52.2 J
17.2
62.6
112
116
132
35.6 J
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
0.96 J
1.9 J
4.9
1.4 J
2.2 J
2.3 J
2.2 J
2.7 J
1.9 J
Silver
1.6(a)
2.2(a)
mg/kg
1.1 J
3.2 J
5.2 J
0.17 J
4.4
5.8
5.9
6.1
0.28 J
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
502
3790
2370
127
1510
3450
3280
2600
168
Total organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
50200
95200
87600
26000
122000
113000
94200
120000
45300
Moisture Content
NSL
NSL
0/
/O
26.7
31.3
57.2
39.9
49.8
77.3
80.5
80.3
142
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed the TEC
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed the PEC
FD = Field Duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
NSL = No Screening Level
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000)
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000)
J = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.
J + = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
U = The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported
sample quantitation limit.
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan Page 10 of 13
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-6 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-24
RB 15-24
RB15-24
RB 15-24
RB15-24
RB 15-24
RB15-24
RB15-25
RB15-25
Sample Name:
RB15-24-0010
RB15-24-1020
RB 15-24-2040
RB15-24-2040FD
RB 15-24-4050
RB15-24-5060
RB 15-24-6080
RB15-25-SURF
RB15-25-0010
Sample Date:
11/5/2015
11/5/2015
11/5/2015
11/5/2015
11/5/2015
11/5/2015
11/5/2015
11/4/2015
11/5/2015
Depth
nterval (ft):
0-1
1-2
2-4
2-4
4-5
5-6
6-8
0-0.5
0-1
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
191
20.6
22.2
21.5
31.1
7.8
3.1
1.4
1.8
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
162
311
374
297
222
43.2
26.3
5.9 J
7.5 J
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
0.91
12.4
11.3
12.8
9
1
0.13 J
0.051 J
0.067 J
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
153
147
111
116
96.5
18
9.1
3.5 J
4.9
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
222
635
1000
964
821
147
11.7
2.9
19.4
Iron
20000(a)
40000(a)
mg/kg
26300
27500
24500
25800
20200
8120
10100
3420
4150
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
172
463
677
660
536
92.6
6.9
2.3
2.5
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
0.64
2.5
5.3
4.8
5.1
0.094 J
0.11 U
0.13 U
0.1 U
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
43.9
75.6
57.9
54.4
43.1
12
11.9
4.1 J
4.6
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
1.5 J
3 J
3.1 J
2.5 J
2.2 J
0.62 J
0.4 J
3.5 U
3.8 U
Silver
1.6(a)
2.2(a)
mg/kg
1.4 J
2.7
4.9
5.7
3.4
0.4 J
0.21 J
1 UJ
1.1 U
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
521
1010
2080
2120
1300
219
32.5
9.6
11.6
Total organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
88500
167000
121000
123000
90600
18700
16300
7210
6290
Moisture Content
NSL
NSL
0/
/O
53
75
73.1
79.8
74.4
20.9
22.2
27.2
19.2
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed the TEC
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed the PEC
FD = Field Duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
NSL = No Screening Level
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000)
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000)
J = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.
J + = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
U = The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported
sample quantitation limit.
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 11 of 13
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-6 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-26
RB15-26
RB15-26
RB15-26
RB15-26
RB15-27
RB15-27
RB15-27
RB15-27
Sample Name:
RB15-26-SURF
RB15-26-0010
RB15-26-1030
RB15-26-1030FD
RB15-26-3050
RB15-27-SURF
RB15-27-0010
RB15-27-1030
RB15-27-3050
Sample Date:
11/3/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
10/26/2015
10/28/2015
10/28/2015
10/28/2015
Depth
nterval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
1-3
3-5
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
3-5
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
2.7
3.7
3.2
3.3
2.1
4.8 J
13.3 J
15.9 J
13 J
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
35
62.9
29.8
35.6
13.4 J
34.2 J
102 J
299 J
146 J
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
0.2 J
0.13 J
0.12 J
0.13 J
0.079 J
0.25 J
0.93
21.5
1.7
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
9.2
10 J
7.9 J
8.9 J
4.8
12.7 J
26.5 J
140 J
32.9 J
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
15
11.8
8.7
9.9
4.5
33.8 J
150 J
556 J
554 J
Iron
20000(a)
40000(a)
mg/kg
9290
12100
10300
11300
5550
10300 J
8800 J
22200 J
13800 J
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
11.8
7.2
5.8
6.1
3
26.4
60.2
459
370
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
0.059 J
0.11 U
0.1 U
0.11 U
0.11 U
0.33
0.31
4.3
2.6
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
10.6
13.6 J
10.6 J
11.5 J
5.9
9.8
15
68.9
24.5
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
2.7 U
3.4 U
4.1 U
0.88 J
3.9 U
0.51 J
0.89 J
1.8 J
0.64 J
Silver
1.6(a)
2.2(a)
mg/kg
0.77 U
0.98 UJ
1.2 UJ
0.93 UJ
1.1 U
0.9 U
0.13 J
4
2.2
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
39.3
33.2
26.2
28.6
14.3
62.8 J
167 J
1220 J
842 J
Total organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
6530
15300
15500
19300
11600
19500 J
181000 J
121000 J
122000 J
Moisture Content
NSL
NSL
0/
/O
9.6
25.9
20.6
20.4
24.4
31.5
34.6
76.7
83.3
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed the TEC
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed the PEC
FD = Field Duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
NSL = No Screening Level
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000)
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000)
J = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.
J + = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
U = The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported
sample quantitation limit.
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan Page 12 of 13
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-6 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR METALS AND TOC
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-27
RB15-27
RB15-28
RB15-28
RB15-28
Sample Name:
RB15-27-5065
RB15-27-6570
RB15-28-SURF
RB15-28-0010
RB15-28-1030
Sample Date:
10/28/2015
10/28/2015
10/26/2015
10/28/2015
10/28/2015
Depth
nterval (ft):
5-6.5
6.5-7
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
Analyte
TEC
PEC
Unit
Arsenic
9.79
33
mg/kg
19.4 J
2.1 J
9.7 J
8 J
7.2 J
Barium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
89.7 J
7.8 J
58.7 J
66.1 J
61.7 J
Cadmium
0.99
4.98
mg/kg
0.91
0.057 J
0.71 J
0.43 J
0.13 J
Chromium
43.4
111
mg/kg
35.2 J
4.8 J
162 J
25.6 J
14.8 J
Copper
31.6
149
mg/kg
302 J
4.6 J
58.7 J
38 J
17.9 J
Iron
20000(a)
40000(a)
mg/kg
12200 J
5340 J
30500 J
20800 J
18800 J
Lead
35.8
128
mg/kg
242
3.5
1970
32.7
9.1
Mercury
0.18
1.06
mg/kg
2.8
0.037 J
0.26
0.38
0.052 J
Nickel
22.7
48.6
mg/kg
18.9
5.6
30.5
28
27.5
Selenium
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
0.91 J
3.1 U
1.2 J
0.66 J
4.3 U
Silver
1.6(a)
2.2(a)
mg/kg
1.5
0.87 U
2.2 U
1.4 U
1.2 U
Zinc
121
459
mg/kg
410 J
13.3 J
325 J
112 J
52.3 J
Total organic carbon
NSL
NSL
mg/kg
42700 J
11000 J
31600 J
48000 J
22700 J
Moisture Content
NSL
NSL
0/
/O
60.4
19.5
122
64.5
24.6
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed the TEC
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed the PEC
FD = Field Duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
NSL = No Screening Level
PEC = Probable effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000)
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of Consensus-
Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al.
2000)
J = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.
J + = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased high.
U = The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported
sample quantitation limit.
(a) Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for
Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan Page 13 of 13
Site Characterization Report
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC TABLE 3-7 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR SEM/AVS EA Project No.: 62561.25
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (ft):
RB15-01
RB15-02
RB15-02
RB15-03
RB15-04
RB15-05
RB15-01-SURF
RB15-02-SURF
RB15-02-SURFFD
RB15-03-SURF
RB15-04-SURF
RB15-05-SURF
10/30/2015
10/31/2015
10/31/2015
10/31/2015
10/31/2015
10/31/2015
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
Cadmium
(imole/g
0.0083 J
0.0065 J
0.0098 J
0.0098 J
0.013 J
0.0047 J
Copper
(imole/g
0.32
0.78 J
0.79 J
0.32 J
2.9 J
0.32 J
Lead
(imole/g
0.22
0.45 J
0.52 J
0.14
2.8 J
0.26 J
Mercury
(imole/g
0.000029 J
0.00031 J
0.0005 J
0.000019 J-
0.00021 J
0.0001 J
Nickel
(imole/g
0.23 J
0.25
0.26
0.16 J
0.28
0.13 J
Zinc
(imole/g
1.8
2 J
2.2 J
1.1
6.3 J
1.1 J
Acid Volatile Sulfides (AVS)
(.unole/g
8.3
2.7
1.8
9.1
0.72 U
1.9
SEM/AVS Ratio
none
0.31
1.3
2.2
0.2
--
0.99
NOTES:
AVS = Acid volatile sulfides
Bolded values exceed 1 SEM/AVS ratio
FD = Field duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
SEM = Simultaneously extracted metals
jimole/g = micromole per gram
J = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.
J - = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported
sample quantitation limit.
SEM/AVS not calculated because AVS was not detected.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 5
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC TABLE 3-7 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR SEM/AVS EA Project No.: 62561.25
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Location ID:
RB15-06
RB15-07
RB15-08
RB15-08
RB15-09
RB15-09
Sample Name:
RB15-06-SURF
RB15-07-SURF
RB15-08-SURF
RB15-08-SURFFD
RB15-09-SURF
RB15-09-SURFFD
Sample Date:
10/31/2015
11/1/2015
11/1/2015
11/1/2015
11/1/2015
11/1/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
Cadmium
(imole/g
0.0032 J
0.017 U
0.014 U
0.014 U
0.0044 J
0.0071 J
Copper
(imole/g
0.37 J
0.13 J
0.26
0.38
0.39
0.45
Lead
(imole/g
0.4 J
0.068 J
0.19
0.22
0.34
0.4
Mercury
(imole/g
0.000045 J
0.000039 UJ
0.000025 J
0.000038
0.000029 J
0.000027 J
Nickel
(imole/g
0.15 J
0.066 J
0.094 J
0.065 J
0.16 J
0.13 J
Zinc
(imole/g
1.1 J
0.3 J
0.76
0.79
1.6
1.5
Acid Volatile Sulfides (AVS)
(.unole/g
0.69 U
0.78 U
0.68 U
0.66 U
5
0.84 U
SEM/AVS Ratio
none
--
--
--
--
0.5
--
NOTES:
AVS = Acid volatile sulfides
Bolded values exceed 1 SEM/AVS ratio
FD = Field duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
SEM = Simultaneously extracted metals
jimole/g = micromole per gram
J = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.
J - = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported
sample quantitation limit.
SEM/AVS not calculated because AVS was not detected.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 2 of 5
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC TABLE 3-7 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR SEM/AVS EA Project No.: 62561.25
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Location ID:
RB15-10
RB15-11
RB15-13
RB15-14
RB15-15
RB15-16
RB15-17
Sample Name:
RB15-10-SURF
RB15-11-SURF
RB15-13-SURF
RB15-14-SURF
RB15-15-SURF
RB15-16-SURF
RB15-17-SURF
Sample Date:
11/1/2015
11/3/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
Cadmium
(imole/g
0.014 U
0.02 UJ
0.0054 J
0.0038 J
0.0029 J
0.018 U
0.014 UJ
Copper
(imole/g
0.14
0.53 J
0.61
0.7
0.25
0.53
0.11 J
Lead
(imole/g
0.18
0.14 J
0.69
0.64 J
0.43 J
0.38
0.023 J
Mercury
(imole/g
0.000018 J
0.000065
0.000037 U
0.000065 J-
0.000055 J-
0.00006
0.000033 R
Nickel
(imole/g
0.051 J
0.13 J
0.2 J
0.17 J
0.095 J
0.14 J
0.13 J
Zinc
(imole/g
0.52
1.8 J
3.5
2.9
1.9
1.8
0.28 J
Acid Volatile Sulfides (AVS)
(.unole/g
0.65 U
0.97 U
5.2
8.8
5.7
0.83 U
0.67 U
SEM/AVS Ratio
none
--
--
0.97
0.5
0.47
--
--
NOTES:
AVS = Acid volatile sulfides
Bolded values exceed 1 SEM/AVS ratio
FD = Field duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
SEM = Simultaneously extracted metals
jimole/g = micromole per gram
J = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.
J - = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported
sample quantitation limit.
" SEM/AVS not calculated because AVS was not detected.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 3 of 5
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC TABLE 3-7 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR SEM/AVS EA Project No.: 62561.25
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (ft):
RB15-18
RB15-19
RB15-20
RB15-21
RB 15-22
RB15-23
RB 15-24
RB15-25
RB15-18-SURF
RB15-19-SURF
RB15-20-SURF
RB15-21-SURF
RB15-22-SURF
RB15-23-SURF
RB15-24-SURF
RB15-25-SURF
11/1/2015
11/2/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/3/2015
11/3/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
Cadmium
(imole/g
0.012 U
0.0069 J
0.014 J
0.016 U
0.0044 J
0.018 U
0.0088 J
0.013 U
Copper
(imole/g
0.31
3 J
0.94
0.55
0.66
0.33
0.39
0.02 J
Lead
(imole/g
0.19
0.89 J
0.35
0.32
0.26
0.17
0.22
0.015 U
Mercury
(imole/g
0.000029 J
0.00032 J-
0.000033 J
0.000027 J
0.00006 U
0.000042 U
0.000031 J
0.000011 J
Nickel
(imole/g
0.056 J
0.3 J
0.19 J
0.078 J
0.17 J
0.1 J
0.24 J
0.22 U
Zinc
(imole/g
0.59
3.3 J
6.8
1.9
2.1
1.2
1.7
0.055 J
Acid Volatile Sulfides (AVS)
(.unole/g
0.59 U
0.71 U
8.6
3.6
7.4
14
5.1
0.63 U
SEM/AVS Ratio
none
--
--
0.97
0.78
0.44
0.13
0.5
--
NOTES:
AVS = Acid volatile sulfides
Bolded values exceed 1 SEM/AVS ratio
FD = Field duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
SEM = Simultaneously extracted metals
jimole/g = micromole per gram
J = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.
J - = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported
sample quantitation limit.
" SEM/AVS not calculated because AVS was not detected.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 4 of 5
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC TABLE 3-7 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR SEM/AVS EA Project No.: 62561.25
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
Location ID:
RB15-26
RB15-27
RB15-28
Sample Name:
RB15-26-SURF
RB15-27-SURF
RB15-28-SURF
Sample Date:
11/3/2015
10/26/2015
10/26/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
Cadmium
(imole/g
0.012 U
0.0026 J
0.025 U
Copper
(imole/g
0.066 J
0.24
0.16 J
Lead
(imole/g
0.016
0.085
0.14
Mercury
(imole/g
0.000028 U
0.000047 J-
0.00006 R
Nickel
(imole/g
0.036 J
0.072 J
0.21 J
Zinc
(imole/g
0.13
1
1.1
Acid Volatile Sulfides (AVS)
(.unole/g
0.57
1.5
23
SEM/AVS Ratio
none
0.44
0.93
0.069
NOTES:
AVS = Acid volatile sulfides
Bolded values exceed 1 SEM/AVS ratio
FD = Field duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
SEM = Simultaneously extracted metals
jimole/g = micromole per gram
J = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is an
approximate concentration of the analyte in the sample.
J - = The analyte was positively identified; the associated numerical value is
an approximate concentration of the analyte, but may be biased low.
R = The data are unusable. The compound may or may not be present.
U = The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported
sample quantitation limit.
" SEM/AVS not calculated because AVS was not detected.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 5 of 5
Site Characterization Report
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-8 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR TPHs
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-01
RB 15-02
RB 15-02
RB15-03
RB 15-04
RB15-05
RB15-06
Sample Name:
RB15-01-SURF
RB15-02-SURF
RB 15-02-SURFFD
RB15-03-SURF
RB15-04-SURF
RB15-05-SURF
RB15-06-SURF
Sample Date:
10/30/2015
10/31/2015
10/31/2015
10/31/2015
10/31/2015
10/31/2015
10/31/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
foe
fraction
0.0392
0.0134
0.00893
0.0376
0.0169
0.017
0.0174
Diesel Range Organics (C10-C20)
mg/kg
210
300
95 U
160 U
200 U
29
92 U
DRO Sample-Specific Risk Screening Level
mg/kg
217.3
74.3
49.5
208.4
93.7
94.2
96.4
Oil Range Organics (C20-C36)
mg/kg
1400
1800
640
900
1100
130
330
ORO Sample-Specific Risk Screening Level
mg/kg
387.4
132.4
88.3
371.6
167.0
168.0
172.0
I TPH
mg/kg
1610
2100
735
1060
1300
159
422
NOTES:
- Sediment benchmark for DRO used in calculation of sample-
specific risk screening level is 5543 mg/kg
- Sediment benchmark for ORO used in calculation of sample-
specific risk screening level is 9883 mg/kg
Bolded detected values exceed the Sample-Specific Risk
Screening Level
FD = Field duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
mg/kg = milligram per kilogram
TPH = Total petroleum hydrocarbon
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
E TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
E TPH = DRO (C10-C20) + ORO (C20-C36)
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan Page 1 of 4
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-8 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR TPHs
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-07
RB15-08
RB15-08
RB15-09
RB15-09
RB15-10
RB15-11
Sample Name:
RB15-07-SURF
RB15-08-SURF
RB15-08-SURFFD
RB15-09-SURF
RB 15-09-SURFFD
RB15-10-SURF
RB15-11-SURF
Sample Date:
11/1/2015
11/1/2015
11/1/2015
11/1/2015
11/1/2015
11/1/2015
11/3/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
foe
fraction
0.0153
0.00854
0.0127
0.0239
0.031
0.0486
0.0471
Diesel Range Organics (C10-C20)
mg/kg
58
60
30
90
41
73
910
DRO Sample-Specific Risk Screening Level
mg/kg
84.8
47.3
70.4
132.5
171.8
269.4
261.1
Oil Range Organics (C20-C36)
mg/kg
340
320
170
540
190
410
1700
ORO Sample-Specific Risk Screening Level
mg/kg
151.2
84.4
125.5
236.2
306.4
480.3
465.5
I TPH
mg/kg
398
380
200
630
231
483
2610
NOTES:
- Sediment benchmark for DRO used in calculation of sample-
specific risk screening level is 5543 mg/kg
- Sediment benchmark for ORO used in calculation of sample-
specific risk screening level is 9883 mg/kg
Bolded detected values exceed the Sample-Specific Risk
Screening Level
FD = Field duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
mg/kg = milligram per kilogram
TPH = Total petroleum hydrocarbon
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
E TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
E TPH = DRO (C10-C20) + ORO (C20-C36)
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 2 of 4
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-8 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR TPHs
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-13
RB15-14
RB15-15
RB15-16
RB15-17
RB15-18
RB15-19
Sample Name:
RB15-13-SURF
RB15-14-SURF
RB15-15-SURF
RB15-16-SURF
RB15-17-SURF
RB15-18-SURF
RB15-19-SURF
Sample Date:
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/1/2015
11/2/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
foe
fraction
0.0442
0.0194
0.0419
0.0456
0.0141
0.0124
0.0127
Diesel Range Organics (C10-C20)
mg/kg
110U
97 U
1801
130
62
69
74
DRO Sample-Specific Risk Screening Level
mg/kg
245.0
107.5
232.3
252.8
78.2
68.7
70.4
Oil Range Organics (C20-C36)
mg/kg
560
420
860
420
130
160
340
ORO Sample-Specific Risk Screening Level
mg/kg
436.8
191.7
414.1
450.7
139.4
122.5
125.5
I TPH
mg/kg
670
517
1040
550
192
229
414
NOTES:
- Sediment benchmark for DRO used in calculation of sample-
specific risk screening level is 5543 mg/kg
- Sediment benchmark for ORO used in calculation of sample-
specific risk screening level is 9883 mg/kg
Bolded detected values exceed the Sample-Specific Risk
Screening Level
FD = Field duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
mg/kg = milligram per kilogram
TPH = Total petroleum hydrocarbon
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
E TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
E TPH = DRO (C10-C20) + ORO (C20-C36)
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 3 of 4
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 3-8 SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR TPHs
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB 15-20
RB15-21
RB 15-22
RB15-23
RB 15-24
RB15-25
RB 15-26
RB15-27
RB15-28
Sample Name:
RB15-20-SURF
RB15-21-SURF
RB15-22-SURF
RBI 5-23-SURF
RB15-24-SURF
RBI 5-25-SURF
RB15-26-SURF
RB15-27-SURF
RB15-28-SURF
Sample Date:
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/3/2015
11/3/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/3/2015
10/26/2015
10/26/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
foe
fraction
0.0518
0.011
0.04
0.026
0.0453
0.00721
0.00653
0.0195
0.0316
Diesel Range Organics (C10-C20)
mg/kg
1200
74
76 U
110U
190
8.6 U
20
87
170
DRO Sample-Specific Risk Screening Level
mg/kg
287.1
61.0
221.7
144.1
251.1
40.0
36.2
108.1
175.2
Oil Range Organics (C20-C36)
mg/kg
6700
470
370
680
1000
15
78
310
750
ORO Sample-Specific Risk Screening Level
mg/kg
511.9
108.7
395.3
257.0
447.7
71.3
64.5
192.7
312.3
I TPH
mg/kg
7900
544
446
790
1190
23.6
98
397
920
NOTES:
- Sediment benchmark for DRO used in calculation of sample-
specific risk screening level is 5543 mg/kg
- Sediment benchmark for ORO used in calculation of sample-
specific risk screening level is 9883 mg/kg
Bolded detected values exceed the Sample-Specific Risk
Screening Level
FD = Field duplicate
RB = Riverbend Area
mg/kg = milligram per kilogram
TPH = Total petroleum hydrocarbon
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
E TPH = Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons
E TPH = DRO (C10-C20) + ORO (C20-C36)
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 4 of 4
Site Characterization Report
-------
Tables for
Section 4: Equilibrium Partitioning Sediment Benchmarks
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-01
RB15-01
Sample Name:
RB15-01-SURF
RB15-01-0010
Sample Date:
10/30/2015
11/3/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
3.92
0.0392
--
--
3.69
0.0369
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
--
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
1.95
1.95
0.004
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.09
2.32
2.32
0.005
0.19
5.15
5.15
0.01
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.03
0.69
0.69
0.002
0.07
1.92
1.92
0.004
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.21
5.36
5.36
0.01
0.52
14.09
14.09
0.02
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
1.10
28.06
28.06
0.03
2.50
67.75
67.75
0.08
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
1.20
30.61
30.61
0.03
2.30
62.33
62.33
0.06
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
1.40
35.71
35.71
0.04
2.50
67.75
67.75
0.07
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
1.00
25.51
25.51
0.03
1.90
51.49
51.49
0.05
B enzo |g, h,i] pery lene
1,095
648
0.77
19.64
19.64
0.02
1.60
43.36
43.36
0.04
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.95
24.23
24.23
0.02
2.20
59.62
59.62
0.06
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.38
9.69
9.69
0.01
1.00
27.10
27.10
0.03
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
1.30
33.16
33.16
0.04
2.90
78.59
78.59
0.10
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.39
9.95
9.95
0.01
0.97
26.29
26.29
0.04
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.49
13.28
13.28
0.01
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.58
14.80
14.80
--
1.40
37.94
37.94
--
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.69
18.70
18.70
0.03
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
~
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
--
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.69
18.70
18.70
0.02
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.62
16.80
16.80
0.03
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.56
15.18
15.18
0.02
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
~
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
--
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
1.30
33.16
33.16
0.04
2.70
73.17
73.17
0.09
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.25
6.38
6.38
0.01
0.54
14.63
14.63
0.01
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
2.50
63.78
63.78
0.09
5.20
141
141
0.20
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.08
2.14
2.14
0.004
0.22
5.96
5.96
0.01
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
1,115
--
0.80
20.41
20.41
0.02
1.60
43.36
43.36
0.04
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.05
1.17
1.17
0.003
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.33
8.42
8.42
0.01
0.66
17.89
17.89
0.02
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
1.10
28.06
28.06
0.05
2.20
59.62
59.62
0.10
Pyrene
697
9,090
2.10
53.57
53.57
0.08
4.80
130
130
0.19
—
ESBTU FCVi
—
—
—
0.55
--
--
--
1.34
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH
concentration in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the
contribution up to the maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D
ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section
6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 42
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-01
RB15-01
Sample Name:
RB15-01-1030
RB15-01-3050
Sample Date:
11/3/2015
11/3/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
1-3
3-5
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
5.39
0.0539
--
--
6.08
0.0608
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
--
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.23
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.32
0.00
0.00
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.35
6.49
6.49
0.01
0.57
9.38
9.38
0.02
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.30
5.57
5.57
0.01
0.46
7.57
7.57
0.02
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.10
1.76
1.76
0.004
0.19
3.13
3.13
0.01
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.74
13.73
13.73
0.02
1.00
16.45
16.45
0.03
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
2.20
40.82
40.82
0.05
3.30
54.28
54.28
0.06
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
2.00
37.11
37.11
0.04
3.00
49.34
49.34
0.05
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
2.10
38.96
38.96
0.04
3.00
49.34
49.34
0.05
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
1.60
29.68
29.68
0.03
2.40
39.47
39.47
0.04
B enzo |g, h,i] pery lene
1,095
648
1.40
25.97
25.97
0.02
2.00
32.89
32.89
0.03
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
1.80
33.40
33.40
0.03
2.50
41.12
41.12
0.04
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
1.00
18.55
18.55
0.02
1.90
31.25
31.25
0.03
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
3.30
61.22
61.22
0.08
5.10
83.88
83.88
0.11
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.23
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.64
10.53
10.53
0.02
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.23
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.67
11.02
11.02
0.02
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
2.00
37.11
37.11
0.06
3.20
52.63
52.63
0.08
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.63
11.69
11.69
0.01
1.30
21.38
21.38
0.02
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
1.80
33.40
33.40
--
3.30
54.28
54.28
--
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.90
16.70
16.70
0.02
1.40
23.03
23.03
0.03
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
2.50
46.38
46.38
0.09
4.40
72.37
72.37
0.14
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
2.10
38.96
38.96
0.05
3.60
59.21
59.21
0.08
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
~
0.23
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.75
12.34
12.34
0.01
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
--
1.10
20.41
20.41
0.02
1.80
29.61
29.61
0.03
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
1.20
22.26
22.26
0.03
1.70
27.96
27.96
0.04
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
4.10
76.07
76.07
0.13
6.90
113
113
0.20
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
2.20
40.82
40.82
0.05
3.80
62.50
62.50
0.08
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
~
0.23
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.32
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
--
2.70
50.09
50.09
0.08
4.60
75.66
75.66
0.12
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
1.10
20.41
20.41
0.02
2.40
39.47
39.47
0.04
Chrysene
844
826
2.40
44.53
44.53
0.05
3.60
59.21
59.21
0.07
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.45
8.35
8.35
0.01
0.68
11.18
11.18
0.01
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
5.10
94.62
94.62
0.13
6.80
112
112
0.16
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.37
6.86
6.86
0.01
0.54
8.88
8.88
0.02
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
1,115
--
1.30
24.12
24.12
0.02
1.90
31.25
31.25
0.03
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.12
2.23
2.23
0.01
0.25
4.11
4.11
0.01
Perylene
967
431
0.54
10.02
10.02
0.01
0.80
13.16
13.16
0.01
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
2.90
53.80
53.80
0.09
4.20
69.08
69.08
0.12
Pyrene
697
9,090
4.70
87.20
87.20
0.13
6.70
110
110
0.16
—
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
1.32
--
--
--
1.89
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH
concentration in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the
contribution up to the maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D
ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section
6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 2 of 42
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
RB15-02
RB15-02
RB15-02
RB15-02-SURF
RB15-02-SURFFD
RB15-02-0010
10/31/2015
10/31/2015
11/3/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-1
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
1.34
0.0134
--
--
0.893
0.00893
--
--
6.95
0.0695
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
--
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.49
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.47
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.24
17.91
17.91
0.04
0.47
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.53
39.55
39.55
0.08
0.35
39.19
39.19
0.08
13.00
187
187
0.38
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.16
11.94
11.94
0.03
0.12
13.44
13.44
0.03
3.50
50.36
50.36
0.11
Anthracene
594
1,300
1.10
82.09
82.09
0.14
0.84
94.06
94.06
0.16
36.00
518
518
0.87
Benzo[a]anthracene
841
4,153
4.30
321
321
0.38
3.20
358
358
0.43
68.00
978
978
1.16
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
4.80
358
358
0.37
3.60
403
403
0.42
59.00
849
849
0.88
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
4.00
299
299
0.30
2.80
314
314
0.32
36.00
518
518
0.53
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
3.30
246
246
0.25
2.60
291
291
0.30
38.00
547
547
0.57
B enzo |g, h,i] pery lene
1,095
648
2.50
187
187
0.17
2.00
224
224
0.20
30.00
432
432
0.39
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
3.40
254
254
0.26
2.70
302
302
0.31
35.00
504
504
0.51
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
1.50
112
112
0.12
1.30
146
146
0.16
29.00
417
417
0.45
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
5.90
440
440
0.57
4.70
526
526
0.68
130
1871
1871
2.43
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.49
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.47
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.49
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.47
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
1.90
142
142
0.21
1.50
168
168
0.25
62.00
892
892
1.33
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.49
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.47
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
2.30
172
172
--
1.70
190
190
--
35.00
504
504
--
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.49
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.47
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
0.49
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.47
0.00
0.00
0.00
24.00
345
345
0.68
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
~
0.49
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.47
0.00
0.00
0.00
25.00
360
360
0.48
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
~
0.49
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.47
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
~
0.49
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.47
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.49
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.47
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
--
0.49
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.47
0.00
0.00
0.00
23.00
331
331
0.57
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.49
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.47
0.00
0.00
0.00
13.00
187
187
0.23
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
~
0.49
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.47
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.49
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.47
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.49
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.47
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
4.30
321
321
0.38
3.40
381
381
0.45
63.00
906
826
0.98
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.69
51.49
51.49
0.05
0.54
60.47
60.47
0.05
8.10
117
117
0.10
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
7.90
590
590
0.83
5.90
661
661
0.93
92.00
1324
1324
1.87
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.40
29.85
29.85
0.06
0.28
31.35
31.35
0.06
12.00
173
173
0.32
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
1,115
--
2.60
194
194
0.17
2.00
224
224
0.20
24.00
345
345
0.31
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.48
35.82
35.82
0.09
0.47
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
Perylene
967
431
1.20
89.55
89.55
0.09
0.47
0.00
0.00
0.00
11.00
158
158
0.16
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
4.60
343
343
0.58
3.30
370
370
0.62
92.00
1324
1324
2.22
Pyrene
697
9,090
7.90
590
590
0.85
6.20
694
694
1.00
150
2158
2158
3.10
—
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
5.99
--
--
--
6.65
--
--
--
20.64
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH
concentration in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the
contribution up to the maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D
ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section
6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 3 of 42
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-02
RB15-02
RB15-03
Sample Name:
RB15-02-1030
RB15-02-3040
RB15-03-SURF
Sample Date:
11/3/2015
11/3/2015
10/31/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
1-3
3-4
0-0.5
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
6.1
0.061
--
--
1.22
0.0122
--
--
3.76
0.0376
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
--
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
19.00
311
311
0.70
0.53
43.44
43.44
0.10
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
14.00
230
230
0.51
0.43
35.25
35.25
0.08
0.03
0.66
0.66
0.001
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
25.00
410
410
0.83
0.46
37.70
37.70
0.08
0.07
1.89
1.89
0.004
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
3.50
57.38
57.38
0.13
0.04
3.03
3.03
0.01
0.04
0.96
0.96
0.002
Anthracene
594
1,300
42.00
689
689
1.16
0.42
34.43
34.43
0.06
0.17
4.52
4.52
0.01
Benzo[a]anthracene
841
4,153
48.00
787
787
0.94
0.41
33.61
33.61
0.04
0.85
22.61
22.61
0.03
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
36.00
590
590
0.61
0.31
25.41
25.41
0.03
0.95
25.27
25.27
0.03
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
19.00
311
311
0.32
0.21
17.21
17.21
0.02
1.00
26.60
26.60
0.03
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
22.00
361
361
0.37
0.20
16.39
16.39
0.02
0.73
19.41
19.41
0.02
B enzo |g, h,i] pery lene
1,095
648
17.00
279
279
0.25
0.17
13.93
13.93
0.01
0.54
14.36
14.36
0.01
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
24.00
393
393
0.40
0.21
17.21
17.21
0.02
0.65
17.29
17.29
0.02
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
31.00
508
508
0.55
0.24
19.67
19.67
0.02
0.34
9.04
9.04
0.01
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
110
1803
1803
2.34
0.89
72.95
72.95
0.09
1.30
34.57
34.57
0.04
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
13.00
213
213
0.35
0.15
12.30
12.30
0.02
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
22.00
361
361
0.81
0.62
50.82
50.82
0.11
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
88.00
1443
1443
2.15
0.71
58.20
58.20
0.09
0.39
10.37
10.37
0.02
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
14.00
230
230
0.23
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.17
4.52
4.52
0.004
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
41.00
672
672
--
0.36
29.51
29.51
--
0.52
13.83
13.83
--
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
5.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
84.00
1377
1377
2.70
1.20
98.36
98.36
0.19
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
43.00
705
705
0.94
0.38
31.15
31.15
0.04
0.27
7.18
7.18
0.01
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
5.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
~
14.00
230
230
0.24
0.13
10.66
10.66
0.01
0.18
4.79
4.79
0.01
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
5.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
--
58.00
951
951
1.64
0.60
49.18
49.18
0.08
0.16
4.26
4.26
0.01
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
21.00
344
344
0.42
0.20
16.39
16.39
0.02
0.25
6.65
6.65
0.01
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
~
5.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
15.00
246
246
0.37
0.24
19.67
19.67
0.03
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
5.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
42.00
689
689
0.82
0.37
30.33
30.33
0.04
0.89
23.67
23.67
0.03
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
5.20
85.25
85.25
0.08
0.05
3.69
3.69
0.003
0.15
3.99
3.99
0.004
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
73.00
1197
1197
1.69
0.67
54.92
54.92
0.08
1.60
42.55
42.55
0.06
Fluorene
538
26,000
21.00
344
344
0.64
0.31
25.41
25.41
0.05
0.08
1.99
1.99
0.004
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
1,115
--
15.00
246
246
0.22
0.14
11.48
11.48
0.01
0.54
14.36
14.36
0.01
Naphthalene
385
61,700
5.00
81.97
81.97
0.21
0.26
21.31
21.31
0.06
0.04
1.01
1.01
0.003
Perylene
967
431
5.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.25
6.65
6.65
0.01
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
110
1803
1803
3.03
1.30
107
107
0.18
0.84
22.34
22.34
0.04
Pyrene
697
9,090
100
1639
1639
2.35
0.92
75.41
75.41
0.11
1.50
39.89
39.89
0.06
—
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
26.79
--
--
--
1.51
--
--
--
0.46
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH
concentration in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the
contribution up to the maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D
ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section
6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 4 of 42
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-03
RB15-03
RB15-03
Sample Name:
RB15-03-0010
RB15-03-1030
RB15-03-3050
Sample Date:
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
0-1
1-3
3-5
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
8.65
0.0865
--
--
12.1
0.121
--
--
7.08
0.0708
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
--
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.20
26.45
26.45
0.06
7.80
110
110
0.25
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.19
2.20
2.20
0.005
3.50
28.93
28.93
0.06
10.00
141
141
0.32
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.53
6.13
6.13
0.01
2.60
21.49
21.49
0.04
8.50
120
120
0.24
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.19
2.20
2.20
0.005
0.43
3.55
3.55
0.01
1.20
16.95
16.95
0.04
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.91
10.52
10.52
0.02
3.50
28.93
28.93
0.05
17.00
240
240
0.40
Benzo[a]anthracene
841
4,153
3.40
39.31
39.31
0.05
6.50
53.72
53.72
0.06
20.00
282
282
0.34
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
2.90
33.53
33.53
0.03
4.90
40.50
40.50
0.04
16.00
226
226
0.23
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
2.60
30.06
30.06
0.03
3.60
29.75
29.75
0.03
9.50
134
134
0.14
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
2.20
25.43
25.43
0.03
3.70
30.58
30.58
0.03
9.50
134
134
0.14
B enzo |g, h,i] pery lene
1,095
648
1.40
16.18
16.18
0.01
2.40
19.83
19.83
0.02
6.30
88.98
88.98
0.08
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
2.30
26.59
26.59
0.03
3.80
31.40
31.40
0.03
12.00
169
169
0.17
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
2.30
26.59
26.59
0.03
5.70
47.11
47.11
0.05
11.00
155
155
0.17
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
8.00
92.49
92.49
0.12
18.00
149
149
0.19
52.00
734
734
0.95
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.80
14.88
14.88
0.02
2.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.60
38.02
38.02
0.09
13.00
184
184
0.41
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
5.60
64.74
64.74
0.10
16.00
132
132
0.20
37.00
523
523
0.78
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
1.80
20.81
20.81
0.02
4.60
38.02
38.02
0.04
7.70
109
109
0.11
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
5.20
60.12
60.12
--
12.00
99.17
99.17
--
20.00
282
282
--
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
1.10
12.72
12.72
0.02
3.00
24.79
24.79
0.04
2.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
2.70
31.21
31.21
0.06
19.00
157
157
0.31
38.00
537
537
1.05
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
9.30
108
108
0.14
17.00
140
140
0.19
20.00
282
282
0.38
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.85
9.83
9.83
0.01
2.40
19.83
19.83
0.02
2.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
~
2.70
31.21
31.21
0.03
7.70
63.64
63.64
0.07
6.80
96.05
96.05
0.10
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
2.10
24.28
24.28
0.03
4.10
33.88
33.88
0.04
2.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
--
4.70
54.34
54.34
0.09
18.00
149
149
0.26
26.00
367
367
0.63
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
11.00
127
127
0.15
22.00
182
182
0.22
19.00
268
268
0.32
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
~
0.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
3.90
45.09
45.09
0.07
8.60
71.07
71.07
0.11
9.80
138
138
0.21
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
6.40
73.99
73.99
0.08
13.00
107
107
0.12
10.00
141
141
0.15
Chrysene
844
826
3.50
40.46
40.46
0.05
7.00
57.85
57.85
0.07
19.00
268
268
0.32
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.41
4.74
4.74
0.004
0.86
7.11
7.11
0.01
2.00
28.25
28.25
0.03
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
6.20
71.68
71.68
0.10
9.80
80.99
80.99
0.11
31.00
438
438
0.62
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.44
5.09
5.09
0.01
2.10
17.36
17.36
0.03
7.70
109
109
0.20
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
1,115
--
1.20
13.87
13.87
0.01
2.00
16.53
16.53
0.01
5.40
76.27
76.27
0.07
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.14
1.62
1.62
0.004
1.10
9.09
9.09
0.02
3.90
55.08
55.08
0.14
Perylene
967
431
0.71
8.21
8.21
0.01
0.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
4.00
46.24
46.24
0.08
14.00
116
116
0.19
50.00
706
706
1.18
Pyrene
697
9,090
5.70
65.90
65.90
0.09
12.00
99.17
99.17
0.14
43.00
607
607
0.87
—
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
1.49
--
--
--
2.79
--
--
--
10.49
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH
concentration in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the
contribution up to the maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D
ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section
6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 5 of 42
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-03
RB15-04
RB15-04
Sample Name:
RB15-03-5070
RB15-04-SURF
RB15-04-0010
Sample Date:
11/2/2015
10/31/2015
11/3/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
5-7
0-0.5
0-1
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
1.19
0.0119
--
--
1.69
0.0169
--
--
6.24
0.0624
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
--
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.19
15.97
15.97
0.04
1.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.19
15.97
15.97
0.04
0.75
44.38
44.38
0.10
0.80
12.82
12.82
0.03
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.21
17.65
17.65
0.04
2.00
118
118
0.24
6.00
96.15
96.15
0.20
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.03
2.35
2.35
0.01
1.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.30
20.83
20.83
0.05
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.31
26.05
26.05
0.04
5.70
337
337
0.57
19.00
304
304
0.51
Benzo[a]anthracene
841
4,153
0.48
40.34
40.34
0.05
9.60
568
568
0.68
29.00
465
465
0.55
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.37
31.09
31.09
0.03
8.50
503
503
0.52
21.00
337
337
0.35
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.31
26.05
26.05
0.03
7.00
414
414
0.42
15.00
240
240
0.25
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.25
21.01
21.01
0.02
5.50
325
325
0.34
14.00
224
224
0.23
B enzo |g, h,i] pery lene
1,095
648
0.19
15.97
15.97
0.01
4.20
249
249
0.23
10.00
160
160
0.15
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.24
20.17
20.17
0.02
7.10
420
420
0.43
15.00
240
240
0.25
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.29
24.37
24.37
0.03
3.10
183
183
0.20
15.00
240
240
0.26
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
1.10
92.44
92.44
0.12
11.00
651
651
0.85
53.00
849
849
1.10
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.11
9.24
9.24
0.02
1.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.25
21.01
21.01
0.05
1.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.79
66.39
66.39
0.10
4.60
272
272
0.41
39.00
625
625
0.93
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.19
15.97
15.97
0.02
1.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
7.00
112
112
0.11
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.48
40.34
40.34
--
4.60
272
272
--
22.00
353
353
--
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.09
7.82
7.82
0.01
1.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.60
89.74
89.74
0.13
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
0.85
71.43
71.43
0.14
1.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
16.00
256
256
0.50
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
0.51
42.86
42.86
0.06
2.50
148
148
0.20
22.00
353
353
0.47
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.10
8.40
8.40
0.01
1.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
~
0.21
17.65
17.65
0.02
1.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
8.50
136
136
0.14
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.10
8.40
8.40
0.01
1.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
--
0.74
62.18
62.18
0.11
1.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
22.00
353
353
0.61
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.47
39.50
39.50
0.05
1.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
15.00
240
240
0.29
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
~
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.30
25.21
25.21
0.04
1.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.30
149
149
0.23
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.26
21.85
21.85
0.02
1.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
7.90
127
127
0.14
Chrysene
844
826
0.43
36.13
36.13
0.04
9.40
556
556
0.66
26.00
417
417
0.49
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.04
3.70
3.70
0.003
1.30
76.92
76.92
0.07
3.20
51.28
51.28
0.05
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.85
71.43
71.43
0.10
23.00
1361
1361
1.92
49.00
785
785
1.11
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.18
15.13
15.13
0.03
2.80
166
166
0.31
7.10
114
114
0.21
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
1,115
--
0.15
12.61
12.61
0.01
4.60
272
272
0.24
9.70
155
155
0.14
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.09
7.31
7.31
0.02
2.10
124
124
0.32
0.99
15.87
15.87
0.04
Perylene
967
431
0.09
7.31
7.31
0.01
1.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
1.10
92.44
92.44
0.16
23.00
1361
1361
2.28
51.00
817
817
1.37
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.92
77.31
77.31
0.11
19.00
1124
1124
1.61
61.00
978
978
1.40
—
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
1.49
--
--
--
12.49
--
--
--
12.13
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH
concentration in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the
contribution up to the maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D
ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section
6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 6 of 42
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
RB15-04
RB15-04
RB15-04
RB15-04-1030
RB15-04-1030FD
RB15-04-3040
11/3/2015
11/3/2015
11/3/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
1-3
1-3
3-4
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
1.84
0.0184
--
--
3.03
0.0303
--
--
1.7
0.017
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
--
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.43
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.49
0.49
0.001
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.30
16.30
16.30
0.04
0.59
19.47
19.47
0.04
0.01
0.42
0.42
0.001
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
1.00
54.35
54.35
0.11
1.70
56.11
56.11
0.11
0.004
0.26
0.26
0.001
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.23
12.50
12.50
0.03
0.25
8.25
8.25
0.02
0.002
0.10
0.10
0.0002
Anthracene
594
1,300
3.30
179
179
0.30
4.60
152
152
0.26
0.01
0.59
0.59
0.001
Benzo[a]anthracene
841
4,153
6.70
364
364
0.43
7.40
244
244
0.29
0.02
1.00
1.00
0.001
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
5.30
288
288
0.30
5.70
188
188
0.19
0.01
0.82
0.82
0.001
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
3.90
212
212
0.22
4.60
152
152
0.16
0.01
0.65
0.65
0.001
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
3.30
179
179
0.19
3.70
122
122
0.13
0.01
0.76
0.76
0.001
B enzo |g, h,i] pery lene
1,095
648
2.70
147
147
0.13
3.20
106
106
0.10
0.02
1.00
1.00
0.001
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
3.60
196
196
0.20
4.30
142
142
0.14
0.01
0.54
0.54
0.001
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
2.80
152
152
0.16
2.90
95.71
95.71
0.10
0.02
1.12
1.12
0.001
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
9.50
516
516
0.67
10.00
330
330
0.43
0.05
2.76
2.76
0.004
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.43
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.49
0.49
0.001
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.43
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.65
0.65
0.001
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
4.80
261
261
0.39
5.60
185
185
0.28
0.05
2.94
2.94
0.004
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
1.10
59.78
59.78
0.06
0.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
1.18
1.18
0.001
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
3.80
207
207
--
3.80
125
125
--
0.04
2.41
2.41
"
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.43
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.71
0.71
0.001
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
1.80
97.83
97.83
0.19
2.30
75.91
75.91
0.15
0.04
2.53
2.53
0.005
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
~
2.60
141
141
0.19
3.00
99.01
99.01
0.13
0.05
2.94
2.94
0.004
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
~
0.43
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.88
0.88
0.001
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
~
1.60
86.96
86.96
0.09
1.60
52.81
52.81
0.06
0.04
2.12
2.12
0.002
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.43
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
1.06
1.06
0.001
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
--
1.70
92.39
92.39
0.16
2.20
72.61
72.61
0.12
0.10
5.65
5.65
0.01
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
1.60
86.96
86.96
0.10
1.70
56.11
56.11
0.07
0.06
3.59
3.59
0.004
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
~
0.43
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.42
0.42
0.0003
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.43
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.09
5.53
5.53
0.01
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.43
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
2.71
2.71
0.003
Chrysene
844
826
5.70
310
310
0.37
6.30
208
208
0.25
0.02
1.24
1.24
0.001
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.85
46.20
46.20
0.04
1.10
36.30
36.30
0.03
0.003
0.16
0.16
0.0001
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
11.00
598
598
0.85
13.00
429
429
0.61
0.03
1.59
1.59
0.002
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.86
46.74
46.74
0.09
2.00
66.01
66.01
0.12
0.01
0.32
0.32
0.001
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
1,115
--
2.50
136
136
0.12
3.00
99.01
99.01
0.09
0.01
0.41
0.41
0.0004
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.29
15.76
15.76
0.04
0.85
28.05
28.05
0.07
0.004
0.23
0.23
0.001
Perylene
967
431
1.30
70.65
70.65
0.07
0.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.54
0.54
0.001
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
7.30
397
397
0.67
12.00
396
396
0.66
0.03
2.00
2.00
0.003
Pyrene
697
9,090
13.00
707
707
1.01
14.00
462
462
0.66
0.04
2.24
2.24
0.003
—
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
7.18
--
--
--
5.23
--
--
--
0.07
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH
concentration in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the
contribution up to the maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D
ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section
6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 7 of 42
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-05
RB15-05
RB15-05
Sample Name:
RB15-05-SURF
RB15-05-0010
RB15-05-1030
Sample Date:
10/31/2015
11/3/2015
11/3/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
1.7
0.017
--
--
1.31
0.0131
--
--
0.778
0.00778
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
--
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
1.27
1.27
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.06
3.24
3.24
0.01
1.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
1.12
1.12
0.00
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.13
7.65
7.65
0.02
0.31
23.66
23.66
0.05
0.002
0.30
0.30
0.001
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.09
5.47
5.47
0.01
1.10
83.97
83.97
0.19
0.002
0.23
0.23
0.001
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.37
21.76
21.76
0.04
3.20
244
244
0.41
0.01
0.69
0.69
0.00
Benzo[a]anthracene
841
4,153
1.30
76.47
76.47
0.09
15.00
1145
1145
1.36
0.02
2.44
2.44
0.00
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
1.40
82.35
82.35
0.09
15.00
1145
1145
1.19
0.02
2.31
2.31
0.00
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.89
52.35
52.35
0.05
7.10
542
542
0.55
0.02
2.44
2.44
0.00
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.93
54.71
54.71
0.06
10.00
763
763
0.79
0.02
2.44
2.44
0.00
B enzo |g, h,i] pery lene
1,095
648
0.67
39.41
39.41
0.04
8.80
672
648
0.59
0.02
3.08
3.08
0.00
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.78
45.88
45.88
0.05
8.90
679
679
0.69
0.01
1.67
1.67
0.00
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.68
40.00
40.00
0.04
5.40
412
412
0.44
0.02
2.96
2.96
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
2.80
165
165
0.21
26.00
1985
1985
2.58
0.05
5.78
5.78
0.01
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
1.13
1.13
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
1.54
1.54
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
1.20
70.59
70.59
0.11
9.40
718
718
1.07
0.05
6.04
6.04
0.01
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
2.83
2.83
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.90
52.94
52.94
--
7.00
534
534
--
0.06
7.33
7.33
"
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
2.06
2.06
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
0.30
17.65
17.65
0.03
1.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
6.56
6.56
0.01
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
0.58
34.12
34.12
0.05
4.20
321
321
0.43
0.06
7.97
7.97
0.01
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
3.08
3.08
0.003
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
~
0.27
15.88
15.88
0.02
1.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
5.66
5.66
0.01
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
2.83
2.83
0.004
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
--
0.28
16.47
16.47
0.03
1.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.12
15.42
15.42
0.03
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.32
18.82
18.82
0.02
1.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
9.13
9.13
0.01
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
~
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.93
0.93
0.001
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
14.14
14.14
0.02
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
7.20
7.20
0.01
Chrysene
844
826
1.20
70.59
70.59
0.08
12.00
916
826
0.98
0.03
3.47
3.47
0.004
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.21
12.35
12.35
0.01
1.80
137
137
0.12
0.004
0.48
0.48
0.0004
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
1.80
106
106
0.15
20.00
1527
1527
2.16
0.03
4.24
4.24
0.01
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.11
6.47
6.47
0.01
0.34
25.95
25.95
0.05
0.004
0.49
0.49
0.001
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
1,115
--
0.58
34.12
34.12
0.03
6.50
496
496
0.45
0.01
1.29
1.29
0.001
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.08
4.76
4.76
0.01
1.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.004
0.51
0.51
0.001
Perylene
967
431
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
1.67
1.67
0.002
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
1.30
76.47
76.47
0.13
7.90
603
603
1.01
0.02
2.83
2.83
0.005
Pyrene
697
9,090
2.60
153
153
0.22
38.00
2901
2901
4.16
0.04
4.63
4.63
0.01
—
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
1.59
--
--
--
19.27
--
--
--
0.17
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH
concentration in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the
contribution up to the maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D
ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section
6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 8 of 42
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-06
RB15-06
RB15-06
Sample Name:
RB15-06-SURF
RB15-06-0010
RB15-06-1030
Sample Date:
10/31/2015
11/3/2015
11/3/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
1.74
0.0174
--
--
2.68
0.0268
--
--
0.995
0.00995
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
--
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.23
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.54
0.54
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.23
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.37
0.37
0.00
0.004
0.43
0.43
0.001
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.25
14.37
14.37
0.03
0.01
0.41
0.41
0.00
0.002
0.19
0.19
0.0004
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.12
6.90
6.90
0.02
0.01
0.28
0.28
0.00
0.001
0.09
0.09
0.0002
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.63
36.21
36.21
0.06
0.03
1.27
1.27
0.00
0.004
0.38
0.38
0.001
Benzo[a]anthracene
841
4,153
2.40
138
138
0.16
0.15
5.60
5.60
0.01
0.01
0.57
0.57
0.00
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
2.40
138
138
0.14
0.13
4.85
4.85
0.01
0.005
0.47
0.47
0.0005
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
1.50
86.21
86.21
0.09
0.10
3.73
3.73
0.00
0.01
0.67
0.67
0.00
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
1.60
91.95
91.95
0.10
0.10
3.73
3.73
0.00
0.01
0.76
0.76
0.00
B enzo |g, h,i] pery lene
1,095
648
1.20
68.97
68.97
0.06
0.08
3.02
3.02
0.00
0.01
0.97
0.97
0.00
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
1.80
103
103
0.11
0.08
3.13
3.13
0.00
0.003
0.34
0.34
0.0003
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
1.00
57.47
57.47
0.06
0.09
3.25
3.25
0.00
0.02
1.61
1.61
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
4.30
247
247
0.32
0.22
8.21
8.21
0.01
0.03
2.91
2.91
0.00
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.23
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.75
0.75
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.23
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.64
0.64
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
1.20
68.97
68.97
0.10
0.16
5.97
5.97
0.01
0.05
5.03
5.03
0.01
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.23
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
1.72
1.72
0.00
0.02
1.61
1.61
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
1.40
80.46
80.46
--
0.14
5.22
5.22
"
0.04
3.92
3.92
"
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.23
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
1.38
1.38
0.00
0.02
1.51
1.51
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
0.23
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
4.10
4.10
0.01
0.04
4.32
4.32
0.01
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
0.75
43.10
43.10
0.06
0.17
6.34
6.34
0.01
0.06
6.13
6.13
0.01
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.23
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
1.75
1.75
0.002
0.02
1.81
1.81
0.002
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
~
0.23
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.09
3.32
3.32
0.003
0.04
3.92
3.92
0.004
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.23
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
2.05
2.05
0.003
0.02
2.01
2.01
0.003
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
--
0.23
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.43
16.04
16.04
0.03
0.15
15.08
15.08
0.03
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.60
34.48
34.48
0.04
0.18
6.72
6.72
0.01
0.07
7.14
7.14
0.01
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
~
0.23
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
1.04
1.04
0.001
0.01
0.74
0.74
0.001
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.23
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.37
13.81
13.81
0.02
0.14
14.07
14.07
0.02
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.23
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.13
4.85
4.85
0.01
0.06
5.63
5.63
0.01
Chrysene
844
826
2.30
132
132
0.16
0.15
5.60
5.60
0.01
0.01
1.21
1.21
0.001
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.30
17.24
17.24
0.02
0.03
0.97
0.97
0.001
0.002
0.16
0.16
0.0001
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
3.60
207
207
0.29
0.21
7.84
7.84
0.01
0.01
0.79
0.79
0.001
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.25
14.37
14.37
0.03
0.02
0.60
0.60
0.001
0.003
0.27
0.27
0.001
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
1,115
--
1.20
68.97
68.97
0.06
0.07
2.61
2.61
0.002
0.003
0.26
0.26
0.0002
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.13
7.47
7.47
0.02
0.01
0.29
0.29
0.001
0.002
0.24
0.24
0.001
Perylene
967
431
0.56
32.18
32.18
0.03
0.04
1.42
1.42
0.001
0.01
0.78
0.78
0.001
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
2.40
138
138
0.23
0.16
5.97
5.97
0.01
0.02
2.01
2.01
0.003
Pyrene
697
9,090
4.90
282
282
0.40
0.25
9.33
9.33
0.01
0.01
1.31
1.31
0.002
—
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
2.59
--
--
--
0.19
--
--
--
0.12
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH
concentration in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the
contribution up to the maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D
ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section
6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 9 of 42
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-07
RB15-07
Sample Name:
RB15-07-SURF
RB15-07-0010
Sample Date:
11/1/2015
11/2/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
1.53
0.0153
--
--
5.32
0.0532
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
--
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.75
0.75
0.00
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.28
18.30
18.30
0.04
0.12
2.26
2.26
0.00
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.19
12.42
12.42
0.03
0.04
0.70
0.70
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
1.00
65.36
65.36
0.11
0.32
6.02
6.02
0.01
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
3.50
229
229
0.27
0.96
18.05
18.05
0.02
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
3.90
255
255
0.26
0.91
17.11
17.11
0.02
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
2.10
137
137
0.14
0.66
12.41
12.41
0.01
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
2.40
157
157
0.16
0.60
11.28
11.28
0.01
B enzo |g, h,i] pery lene
1,095
648
1.80
118
118
0.11
0.44
8.27
8.27
0.01
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
2.40
157
157
0.16
0.75
14.10
14.10
0.01
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
1.30
84.97
84.97
0.09
0.34
6.39
6.39
0.01
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
6.50
425
425
0.55
1.30
24.44
24.44
0.03
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
2.50
163
163
0.24
0.50
9.40
9.40
0.01
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
1.90
124
124
--
0.53
9.96
9.96
"
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
1.20
78.43
78.43
0.11
0.27
5.08
5.08
0.01
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
~
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
--
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
~
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
3.10
203
203
0.24
0.89
16.73
16.73
0.02
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.52
33.99
33.99
0.03
0.16
3.01
3.01
0.003
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
5.30
346
346
0.49
1.80
33.83
33.83
0.05
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.23
15.03
15.03
0.03
0.11
2.07
2.07
0.004
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
1,115
--
1.60
105
105
0.09
0.46
8.65
8.65
0.01
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
1.26
1.26
0.003
Perylene
967
431
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.23
4.32
4.32
0.004
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
3.30
216
216
0.36
1.10
20.68
20.68
0.03
Pyrene
697
9,090
7.40
484
484
0.69
1.60
30.08
30.08
0.04
—
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
4.21
--
--
--
0.33
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH
concentration in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the
contribution up to the maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D
ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section
6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 10 of 42
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-07
RB15-07
Sample Name:
RB15-07-1020
RB15-07-2030
Sample Date:
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
1-2
2-3
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
14.6
0.146
--
--
1.31
0.0131
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
--
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.10
0.68
0.68
0.002
0.03
2.21
2.21
0.005
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.23
1.58
1.58
0.003
0.03
2.44
2.44
0.005
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.25
1.71
1.71
0.004
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.61
4.18
4.18
0.01
0.02
1.83
1.83
0.003
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
1.20
8.22
8.22
0.01
0.06
4.81
4.81
0.01
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
1.20
8.22
8.22
0.01
0.07
5.11
5.11
0.01
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.58
3.97
3.97
0.004
0.03
2.52
2.52
0.003
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.78
5.34
5.34
0.01
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
B enzo |g, h,i] pery lene
1,095
648
0.51
3.49
3.49
0.003
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.85
5.82
5.82
0.01
0.04
2.90
2.90
0.003
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.47
3.22
3.22
0.003
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
2.40
16.44
16.44
0.02
0.16
12.21
12.21
0.02
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.95
6.51
6.51
0.01
0.16
12.21
12.21
0.02
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.73
5.00
5.00
--
0.04
0.00
0.00
--
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
0.36
2.47
2.47
0.005
0.12
9.16
9.16
0.02
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
0.44
3.01
3.01
0.004
0.14
10.69
10.69
0.01
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
~
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
--
0.30
2.05
2.05
0.004
0.29
22.14
22.14
0.04
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.31
2.12
2.12
0.003
0.15
11.45
11.45
0.01
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
~
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.27
20.61
20.61
0.03
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.09
7.10
7.10
0.01
Chrysene
844
826
1.10
7.53
7.53
0.01
0.07
5.34
5.34
0.01
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.13
0.89
0.89
0.001
0.01
0.61
0.61
0.001
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
2.20
15.07
15.07
0.02
0.08
5.95
5.95
0.01
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.31
2.12
2.12
0.004
0.02
1.60
1.60
0.003
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
1,115
--
0.46
3.15
3.15
0.003
0.03
1.91
1.91
0.002
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.34
2.33
2.33
0.01
0.25
19.08
19.08
0.05
Perylene
967
431
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
2.90
19.86
19.86
0.03
0.12
9.16
9.16
0.02
Pyrene
697
9,090
3.20
21.92
21.92
0.03
0.13
9.92
9.92
0.01
—
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
0.21
--
--
--
0.28
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH
concentration in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the
contribution up to the maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D
ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section
6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 11 of 42
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-08
RB15-08
Sample Name:
RB15-08-SURF
RB15-08-SURFFD
Sample Date:
11/1/2015
11/1/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-0.5
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
0.854
0.00854
--
--
1.27
0.0127
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
--
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.14
16.39
16.39
0.033
0.06
4.41
4.41
0.01
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.06
6.67
6.67
0.015
0.03
2.44
2.44
0.005
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.37
43.33
43.33
0.07
0.12
9.45
9.45
0.02
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
1.30
152
152
0.18
0.53
41.73
41.73
0.05
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
1.10
129
129
0.13
0.49
38.58
38.58
0.04
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
1.20
141
141
0.14
0.49
38.58
38.58
0.04
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.84
98.36
98.36
0.10
0.36
28.35
28.35
0.03
B enzo |g, h,i] pery lene
1,095
648
0.57
66.74
66.74
0.06
0.26
20.47
20.47
0.02
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.92
108
108
0.11
0.37
29.13
29.13
0.03
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.42
49.18
49.18
0.05
0.19
14.96
14.96
0.02
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
1.40
164
164
0.21
0.71
55.91
55.91
0.07
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.50
58.55
58.55
0.09
0.26
20.47
20.47
0.03
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.63
73.77
73.77
--
0.29
22.83
22.83
--
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.13
10.24
10.24
0.01
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
~
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
--
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
~
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
1.20
141
141
0.17
0.48
37.80
37.80
0.04
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.21
24.59
24.59
0.02
0.09
7.17
7.17
0.01
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
2.40
281
281
0.40
1.00
78.74
78.74
0.11
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.16
18.74
18.74
0.035
0.06
4.96
4.96
0.01
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
1,115
--
0.61
71.43
71.43
0.06
0.29
22.83
22.83
0.02
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.09
10.42
10.42
0.027
0.02
1.65
1.65
0.004
Perylene
967
431
0.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.13
10.24
10.24
0.01
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
1.40
164
164
0.28
0.54
42.52
42.52
0.07
Pyrene
697
9,090
1.80
211
211
0.30
0.94
74.02
74.02
0.11
—
ESBTU FCVi
—
—
—
2.49
--
--
--
0.75
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH
concentration in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the
contribution up to the maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D
ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section
6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 12 of 42
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-08
RB15-09
Sample Name:
RB15-08-0010
RB15-09-SURF
Sample Date:
11/2/2015
11/1/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
0-1
0-0.5
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
1.13
0.0113
--
--
2.39
0.0239
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
--
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.37
0.00
0.00
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.03
2.92
2.92
0.01
0.37
0.00
0.00
0.00
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.07
6.28
6.28
0.01
0.28
11.72
11.72
0.02
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.26
23.01
23.01
0.051
0.13
5.44
5.44
0.01
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.22
19.47
19.47
0.03
0.76
31.80
31.80
0.05
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
0.91
80.53
80.53
0.10
2.10
87.87
87.87
0.10
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
1.80
159
159
0.17
2.00
83.68
83.68
0.09
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
1.20
106
106
0.11
1.70
71.13
71.13
0.07
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
1.20
106
106
0.11
1.40
58.58
58.58
0.06
B enzo |g, h,i] pery lene
1,095
648
1.00
88.50
88.50
0.08
1.00
41.84
41.84
0.04
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.92
81.42
81.42
0.08
1.60
66.95
66.95
0.07
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.65
57.52
57.52
0.06
0.74
30.96
30.96
0.03
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
1.70
150
150
0.20
3.00
126
126
0.16
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.37
0.00
0.00
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.37
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.80
70.80
70.80
0.11
1.40
58.58
58.58
0.09
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.41
36.28
36.28
0.04
0.37
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.96
84.96
84.96
--
1.20
50.21
50.21
--
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.37
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.37
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
0.46
40.71
40.71
0.05
0.37
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.37
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
~
0.33
29.20
29.20
0.03
0.37
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.37
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
--
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.37
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.28
24.78
24.78
0.03
0.37
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
~
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.37
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.37
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.37
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.89
78.76
78.76
0.09
2.00
83.68
83.68
0.10
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.32
28.32
28.32
0.03
0.41
17.15
17.15
0.02
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
1.80
159
159
0.23
4.50
188
188
0.27
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.09
8.14
8.14
0.02
0.31
12.97
12.97
0.02
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
1,115
--
0.88
77.88
77.88
0.07
1.10
46.03
46.03
0.04
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.37
0.00
0.00
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.36
31.86
31.86
0.03
0.37
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.87
76.99
76.99
0.13
3.60
151
151
0.25
Pyrene
697
9,090
1.70
150
150
0.22
4.40
184
184
0.26
—
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
2.06
--
--
--
1.77
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH
concentration in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the
contribution up to the maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D
ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section
6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 13 of 42
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-09
RB15-09
RB15-10
Sample Name:
RB15-09-SURFFD
RB15-09-0010
RB15-10-SURF
Sample Date:
11/1/2015
11/2/2015
11/1/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
0-0.5
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
3.1
0.031
--
--
0.686
0.00686
--
--
4.86
0.0486
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
--
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.27
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.08
2.65
2.65
0.01
1.20
175
175
0.39
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.30
9.68
9.68
0.02
2.00
292
292
0.59
0.09
1.91
1.91
0.004
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.08
2.52
2.52
0.01
0.37
53.94
53.94
0.12
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.72
23.23
23.23
0.04
4.70
685
685
1.15
0.59
12.14
12.14
0.02
Benzo[a]anthracene
841
4,153
1.80
58.06
58.06
0.07
6.90
1006
1006
1.20
0.74
15.23
15.23
0.02
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
1.80
58.06
58.06
0.06
4.80
700
700
0.73
0.43
8.85
8.85
0.01
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
1.70
54.84
54.84
0.06
3.60
525
525
0.54
0.46
9.47
9.47
0.01
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
1.30
41.94
41.94
0.04
3.00
437
437
0.45
0.33
6.79
6.79
0.01
B enzo |g, h,i] pery lene
1,095
648
0.81
26.13
26.13
0.02
2.00
292
292
0.27
0.20
4.12
4.12
0.004
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
1.30
41.94
41.94
0.04
4.40
641
641
0.65
0.43
8.85
8.85
0.01
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.70
22.58
22.58
0.02
2.30
335
335
0.36
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
2.50
80.65
80.65
0.10
8.70
1268
1268
1.65
1.00
20.58
20.58
0.03
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.27
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.27
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
1.10
35.48
35.48
0.05
6.20
904
904
1.35
0.40
8.23
8.23
0.01
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.27
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
1.10
35.48
35.48
--
3.90
569
569
--
0.33
6.79
6.79
"
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.27
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
0.27
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.80
408
408
0.80
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
0.54
17.42
17.42
0.02
2.50
364
364
0.49
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.27
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
~
0.27
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.27
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
0.27
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.27
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
0.27
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.27
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.27
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
1.80
58.06
58.06
0.07
6.20
904
826
0.98
0.74
15.23
15.23
0.02
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.25
8.06
8.06
0.01
0.68
99.13
99.13
0.09
0.06
1.30
1.30
0.001
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
3.70
119
119
0.17
17.00
2478
2478
3.51
2.30
47.33
47.33
0.07
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.31
10.00
10.00
0.02
2.50
364
364
0.68
0.24
4.94
4.94
0.01
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
1,115
--
0.85
27.42
27.42
0.02
2.20
321
321
0.29
0.21
4.32
4.32
0.004
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.13
4.19
4.19
0.01
2.70
394
394
1.02
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.27
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
2.70
87.10
87.10
0.15
19.00
2770
2770
4.65
1.80
37.04
37.04
0.06
Pyrene
697
9,090
3.00
96.77
96.77
0.14
12.00
1749
1749
2.51
1.40
28.81
28.81
0.04
—
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
1.15
--
--
--
24.06
--
--
--
0.32
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH
concentration in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the
contribution up to the maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D
ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section
6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 14 of 42
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-10
RB15-11
RB15-11
Sample Name:
RB15-10-0010
RB15-11-SURF
RB15-11-0010
Sample Date:
11/2/2015
11/3/2015
11/4/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
0-1
0-0.5
0-1
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
2.29
0.0229
--
--
4.71
0.0471
--
--
0.982
0.00982
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
--
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
34.00
722
722
1.62
4.40
448
448
1.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
33.00
701
701
1.57
4.50
458
458
1.025
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.07
2.93
2.93
0.01
22.00
467
467
0.95
3.40
346
346
0.705
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.03
1.35
1.35
0.003
7.80
166
166
0.37
0.73
74.34
74.34
0.164
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.23
10.04
10.04
0.02
50.00
1062
1062
1.79
4.90
499
499
0.84
Benzo[a]anthracene
841
4,153
0.90
39.30
39.30
0.05
56.00
1189
1189
1.41
5.00
509
509
0.61
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.86
37.55
37.55
0.04
44.00
934
934
0.97
3.80
387
387
0.40
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.72
31.44
31.44
0.03
31.00
658
658
0.67
2.70
275
275
0.28
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.53
23.14
23.14
0.02
26.00
552
552
0.57
2.30
234
234
0.24
B enzo |g, h,i] pery lene
1,095
648
0.54
23.58
23.58
0.02
20.00
425
425
0.39
2.00
204
204
0.19
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.61
26.64
26.64
0.03
29.00
616
616
0.63
2.70
275
275
0.28
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.32
13.97
13.97
0.02
34.00
722
722
0.78
1.90
193
193
0.21
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
1.40
61.14
61.14
0.08
86.00
1826
1826
2.37
8.20
835
835
1.08
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
42.00
892
892
2.01
5.60
570
570
1.28
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.53
23.14
23.14
0.03
66.00
1401
1401
2.09
6.40
652
652
0.97
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.18
7.86
7.86
0.01
5.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.58
25.33
25.33
--
27.00
573
573
--
2.80
285
285
--
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
68.00
1444
1444
2.83
8.10
825
825
1.62
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
0.35
15.28
15.28
0.02
28.00
594
594
0.80
2.80
285
285
0.38
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
~
0.18
7.86
7.86
0.01
5.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
36.00
764
764
1.32
4.10
418
418
0.72
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.28
12.23
12.23
0.01
14.00
297
297
0.36
0.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.23
10.04
10.04
0.01
5.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.76
33.19
33.19
0.04
40.00
849
826
0.98
3.70
377
377
0.45
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.15
6.55
6.55
0.01
7.30
155
155
0.138
0.62
63.14
63.14
0.056
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
1.30
56.77
56.77
0.08
120.00
2548
2548
3.60
11.00
1120
1120
1.58
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.06
2.79
2.79
0.01
41.00
870
870
1.62
4.50
458
458
0.852
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
1,115
--
0.49
21.40
21.40
0.02
22.00
467
467
0.42
1.90
193
193
0.17
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
41.00
870
870
2.26
9.00
916
916
2.381
Perylene
967
431
0.21
9.17
9.17
0.01
11.00
234
234
0.24
0.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.71
31.00
31.00
0.05
170.00
3609
3609
6.06
18.00
1833
1833
3.08
Pyrene
697
9,090
1.40
61.14
61.14
0.09
140.00
2972
2972
4.26
12.00
1222
1222
1.75
—
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
0.71
--
--
--
39.88
--
--
--
20.29
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH
concentration in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the
contribution up to the maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D
ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section
6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 15 of 42
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-11
RB15-11
RB15-12
Sample Name:
RB15-11-1030
RB15-11-1030FD
RB15-12-0010
Sample Date:
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
1-3
1-3
0-1
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
1.63
0.0163
--
--
1.25
0.0125
--
--
6.05
0.0605
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
--
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.09
5.52
5.52
0.01
0.04
3.12
3.12
0.01
100
0.00
0.00
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.09
5.71
5.71
0.013
0.04
3.04
3.04
0.01
250
4132
4132
9.24
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.07
3.99
3.99
0.01
0.02
1.68
1.68
0.003
220
3636
3636
7.41
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.02
0.92
0.92
0.002
0.003
0.25
0.25
0.001
20
331
331
0.73
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.08
4.72
4.72
0.01
0.02
1.52
1.52
0.003
360
5950
1300
2.19
Benzo[a]anthracene
841
4,153
0.06
3.93
3.93
0.005
0.01
0.78
0.78
0.001
200
3306
3306
3.93
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.05
3.25
3.25
0.003
0.01
0.62
0.62
0.001
150
2479
2479
2.57
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.04
2.45
2.45
0.003
0.01
0.96
0.96
0.001
130
2149
2149
2.19
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
100
0.00
0.00
0.00
B enzo |g, h,i] pery lene
1,095
648
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
42
0.00
0.00
0.00
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.04
2.21
2.21
0.002
0.01
0.44
0.44
0.0004
130
2149
1220
1.24
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.06
3.44
3.44
0.004
0.04
2.80
2.80
0.003
100
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
0.14
8.59
8.59
0.01
0.05
4.32
4.32
0.01
260
4298
4298
5.58
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
100
0.00
0.00
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.11
6.75
6.75
0.02
0.05
4.00
4.00
0.01
310
5124
5124
11.54
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.15
9.20
9.20
0.01
0.10
8.00
8.00
0.01
100
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.05
3.13
3.13
0.003
0.03
2.72
2.72
0.003
100
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.09
5.52
5.52
--
0.07
5.68
5.68
"
100
0.00
0.00
--
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
2.80
2.80
0.004
100
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
0.19
11.66
11.66
0.02
0.09
7.36
7.36
0.01
100
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
0.13
7.98
7.98
0.01
0.13
10.40
10.40
0.01
100
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
3.12
3.12
0.003
100
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
~
0.07
4.48
4.48
0.005
0.07
5.92
5.92
0.01
100
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
3.92
3.92
0.01
100
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
0.22
13.50
13.50
0.02
0.24
19.20
19.20
0.03
100
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.15
9.20
9.20
0.01
0.14
11.20
11.20
0.01
100
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
100
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.19
11.66
11.66
0.02
0.25
20.00
20.00
0.03
100
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.10
6.13
6.13
0.01
0.11
8.80
8.80
0.01
100
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.07
4.23
4.23
0.01
0.03
2.48
2.48
0.003
170
2810
826
0.98
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.01
0.58
0.58
0.001
0.003
0.20
0.20
0.0002
28
463
463
0.41
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.16
9.82
9.82
0.01
0.03
2.56
2.56
0.004
540
8926
8926
12.62
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.08
4.72
4.72
0.01
0.02
1.76
1.76
0.003
230
3802
3802
7.07
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
1,115
--
0.02
1.47
1.47
0.001
0.004
0.32
0.32
0.0003
82
1355
1355
1.22
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.59
36.20
36.20
0.094
0.34
27.20
27.20
0.07
2600
42975
42975
112
Perylene
967
431
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
100
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.29
17.79
17.79
0.03
0.08
6.00
6.00
0.01
760
12562
12562
21.08
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.18
11.04
11.04
0.02
0.04
2.96
2.96
0.004
440
7273
7273
10.43
—
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
0.34
--
--
--
0.26
--
--
--
202.82
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH
concentration in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the
contribution up to the maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D
ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section
6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 16 of 42
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-12
RB15-13
RB15-13
Sample Name:
RB15-12-1030
RB15-13-SURF
RB15-13-0010
Sample Date:
11/4/2015
11/2/2015
11/4/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
1-3
0-0.5
0-1
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
40.9
0.409
--
--
4.42
0.0442
--
--
8.25
0.0825
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
--
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
5500.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
5000.00
12225
12225
27.35
0.87
19.68
19.68
0.04
0.69
8.36
8.36
0.02
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
3200.00
7824
7824
15.93
3.20
72.40
72.40
0.15
3.70
44.85
44.85
0.09
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
5500.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.67
8.12
8.12
0.02
Anthracene
594
1,300
3700.00
9046
1300
2.19
10.00
226
226
0.38
5.90
71.52
71.52
0.12
Benzo[a]anthracene
841
4,153
1600.00
3912
3912
4.65
23.00
520
520
0.62
10.00
121
121
0.14
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
1000.00
2445
2445
2.53
18.00
407
407
0.42
8.50
103
103
0.11
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
5500.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
16.00
362
362
0.37
6.00
72.73
72.73
0.07
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
5500.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
13.00
294
294
0.30
5.50
66.67
66.67
0.07
B enzo |g, h,i] pery lene
1,095
648
5500
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.80
222
222
0.20
4.00
48.48
48.48
0.04
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
5500
0.00
0.00
0.00
14.00
317
317
0.32
7.00
84.85
84.85
0.09
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
5500
0.00
0.00
0.00
8.10
183
183
0.20
4.60
55.76
55.76
0.06
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
5500
0.00
0.00
0.00
26.00
588
588
0.76
16.00
194
194
0.25
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
5500
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
5500
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
5500
0.00
0.00
0.00
12.00
271
271
0.41
11.00
133
133
0.20
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
5500
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.80
33.94
33.94
0.03
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
5500
0.00
0.00
"
11.00
249
249
--
5.60
67.88
67.88
--
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
5500
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
5500
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
8.10
98.18
98.18
0.19
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
5500
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.70
129
129
0.17
5.50
66.67
66.67
0.09
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
5500
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
~
5500
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
5500
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
5500
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
7.10
86.06
86.06
0.15
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
5500
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.10
37.58
37.58
0.05
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
5500
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
5500
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.20
26.67
26.67
0.04
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
5500
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
1500
3667
826
0.98
20.00
452
452
0.54
9.20
112
112
0.13
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
5500
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.70
83.71
83.71
0.07
1.40
16.97
16.97
0.02
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
2400
0.00
0.00
0.00
45.00
1018
1018
1.44
17.00
206
206
0.29
Fluorene
538
26,000
3300
8068
8068
15.00
4.40
99.55
99.55
0.19
2.70
32.73
32.73
0.06
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
1,115
--
430
1051
1051
0.94
9.90
224
224
0.20
4.20
50.91
50.91
0.05
Naphthalene
385
61,700
99000
242054
61700
160
1.80
40.72
40.72
0.11
1.20
14.55
14.55
0.04
Perylene
967
431
5500
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.65
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.10
25.45
25.45
0.03
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
3950
0.00
0.00
0.00
35.00
792
792
1.33
15.00
182
182
0.31
Pyrene
697
9,090
2150
0.00
0.00
0.00
43.00
973
973
1.40
20.00
242
242
0.35
—
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
202.49
--
--
--
9.57
--
--
--
3.08
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH
concentration in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the
contribution up to the maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D
ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section
6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 17 of 42
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-13
RB15-13
RB15-13
Sample Name:
RB15-13-1025
RB15-13-2535
RB15-13-3550
Sample Date:
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
1-2.5
2.5-3.5
3.5-5
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
10.9
0.109
--
--
18.3
0.183
--
--
0.864
0.00864
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
--
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
16.00
147
147
0.33
90.00
492
492
1.10
1.80
208
208
0.467
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
4.10
37.61
37.61
0.08
93.00
508
508
1.14
0.66
76.39
76.39
0.171
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
17.00
156
156
0.32
86.00
470
470
0.96
1.500
174
174
0.354
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
1.70
15.60
15.60
0.03
5.90
32.24
32.24
0.07
0.045
5.21
5.21
0.0115
Anthracene
594
1,300
18.00
165
165
0.28
83.00
454
454
0.76
1.60
185
185
0.312
Benzo[a]anthracene
841
4,153
21.00
193
193
0.23
76.00
415
415
0.49
1.90
220
220
0.261
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
17.00
156
156
0.16
65.00
355
355
0.37
1.30
150
150
0.156
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
9.90
90.83
90.83
0.09
35.00
191
191
0.20
0.99
115
115
0.117
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
11.00
101
101
0.10
40.00
219
219
0.23
0.84
97.22
97.22
0.101
B enzo |g, h,i] pery lene
1,095
648
7.80
71.56
71.56
0.07
25.00
137
137
0.12
0.73
84.49
84.49
0.077
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
14.00
128
128
0.13
44.00
240
240
0.25
1.20
139
139
0.142
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
9.00
82.57
82.57
0.09
33.00
180
180
0.19
0.62
71.76
71.76
0.077
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
39.00
358
358
0.46
140
765
765
0.99
2.60
301
301
0.391
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
2.45
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.22
0.00
0.00
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
12.00
110
110
0.25
120
656
656
1.48
1.50
174
174
0.391
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
27.00
248
248
0.37
120
656
656
0.98
1.90
220
220
0.328
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
2.45
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.22
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
13.00
119
119
--
44.00
240
240
--
0.86
99.54
99.54
--
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
2.45
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.22
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
39.00
358
358
0.70
180
984
984
1.93
3.00
347
347
0.681
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
14.00
128
128
0.17
52.00
284
284
0.38
0.84
97.22
97.22
0.130
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
2.45
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.22
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
~
2.45
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.22
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
2.45
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.22
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
21.00
193
193
0.33
81.00
443
443
0.76
1.20
139
139
0.24
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
8.50
77.98
77.98
0.09
23.00
126
126
0.15
0.22
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
2.45
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.22
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
6.40
58.72
58.72
0.09
10.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.22
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
2.45
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.22
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
19.00
174
174
0.21
67.00
366
366
0.43
1.60
185
185
0.219
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
2.70
24.77
24.77
0.02
8.60
46.99
46.99
0.04
0.270
31.25
31.25
0.0278
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
39.00
358
358
0.51
140
765
765
1.08
3.80
440
440
0.622
Fluorene
538
26,000
9.80
89.91
89.91
0.17
56.00
306
306
0.57
0.90
104
104
0.194
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
1,115
--
7.90
72.48
72.48
0.07
27.00
148
148
0.13
0.75
86.81
86.81
0.0779
Naphthalene
385
61,700
4.50
41.28
41.28
0.11
42.00
230
230
0.60
1.800
208
208
0.541
Perylene
967
431
2.45
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.22
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
47.00
431
431
0.72
220
1202
1202
2.02
3.90
451
451
0.757
Pyrene
697
9,090
46.00
422
422
0.61
170
929
929
1.33
3.20
370
370
0.531
—
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
6.38
--
--
--
16.52
--
--
--
6.74
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH
concentration in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the
contribution up to the maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D
ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section
6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 18 of 42
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-14
RB15-14
RB15-14
Sample Name:
RB15-14-SURF
RB15-14-0010
RB15-14-1030
Sample Date:
11/2/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
1.94
0.0194
--
--
5.84
0.0584
--
--
8.73
0.0873
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
--
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
33.00
565
565
1.27
120
1375
1375
3.08
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.41
21.13
21.13
0.05
35.00
599
599
1.34
150
1718
1718
3.84
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.70
36.08
36.08
0.07
32.00
548
548
1.12
90
1031
1031
2.10
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.41
21.13
21.13
0.05
2.70
46.23
46.23
0.10
4.2
48.1
48.1
0.106
Anthracene
594
1,300
1.60
82.47
82.47
0.14
40.00
685
685
1.15
80.00
916
916
1.54
Benzo[a]anthracene
841
4,153
5.90
304
304
0.36
35.00
599
599
0.71
53.00
607
607
0.72
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
5.20
268
268
0.28
28.00
479
479
0.50
42.00
481
481
0.50
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
3.90
201
201
0.21
20.00
342
342
0.35
23.00
263
263
0.27
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
3.60
186
186
0.19
18.00
308
308
0.32
26.00
298
298
0.31
B enzo |g, h,i] pery lene
1,095
648
3.30
170
170
0.16
15.00
257
257
0.23
9.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
4.10
211
211
0.22
22.00
377
377
0.38
31.00
355
355
0.36
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
2.80
144
144
0.16
15.00
257
257
0.28
24.00
275
275
0.30
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
7.80
402
402
0.52
54.00
925
925
1.20
110
1260
1260
1.64
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
43.00
736
736
1.66
180
2062
2062
4.64
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
3.20
165
165
0.25
43.00
736
736
1.10
100
1145
1145
1.71
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
1.10
56.70
56.70
0.06
4.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
3.30
170
170
--
16.00
274
274
--
32.00
367
367
--
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
1.20
61.86
61.86
0.12
63.00
1079
1079
2.12
190
2176
2176
4.27
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
2.10
108
108
0.15
18.00
308
308
0.41
40.00
458
458
0.61
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
~
1.20
61.86
61.86
0.07
4.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
1.30
67.01
67.01
0.12
29.00
497
497
0.85
74.00
848
848
1.46
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
1.20
61.86
61.86
0.07
4.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
5.40
278
278
0.33
32.00
548
548
0.65
48.00
550
550
0.651
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
1.00
51.55
51.55
0.05
4.90
83.90
83.90
0.07
5.9
67.6
67.6
0.0602
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
10.00
515
515
0.73
63.00
1079
1079
1.53
110
1260
1260
1.78
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.70
36.08
36.08
0.07
22.00
377
377
0.70
57.000
653
653
1.214
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
1,115
--
3.00
155
155
0.14
14.00
240
240
0.22
17.00
195
195
0.175
Naphthalene
385
61,700
1.00
51.55
51.55
0.13
38.00
651
651
1.69
250
2864
2864
7.44
Perylene
967
431
1.30
67.01
67.01
0.07
4.35
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
5.60
289
289
0.48
80.00
1370
1370
2.30
210
2405
2405
4.04
Pyrene
697
9,090
11.00
567
567
0.81
71.00
1216
1216
1.74
140
1604
1604
2.30
—
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
5.98
--
--
--
21.38
--
--
--
38.19
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH
concentration in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the
contribution up to the maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D
ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section
6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 19 of 42
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
RB15-14
RB15-15
RB15-15
RB15-14-3050
RB15-15-SURF
RB15-15-0010
11/4/2015
11/2/2015
11/4/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
3-5
0-0.5
0-1
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
3.28
0.0328
--
--
4.19
0.0419
--
--
5.93
0.0593
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
--
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.88
26.83
26.83
0.06
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
110
1855
1855
4.16
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
1.00
30.49
30.49
0.07
0.12
2.86
2.86
0.01
160
2698
2698
6.036
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.81
24.70
24.70
0.05
0.24
5.73
5.73
0.01
100
1686
1686
3.4345
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.05
1.49
1.49
0.003
0.16
3.82
3.82
0.01
3.10
52.28
52.28
0.1157
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.95
28.96
28.96
0.05
0.50
11.93
11.93
0.02
67.00
1130
1130
1.902
Benzo[a]anthracene
841
4,153
0.94
28.66
28.66
0.03
2.30
54.89
54.89
0.07
36.00
607
607
0.72
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.65
19.82
19.82
0.02
2.40
57.28
57.28
0.06
26.00
438
438
0.4544
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.35
10.67
10.67
0.01
2.20
52.51
52.51
0.05
15.00
253
253
0.26
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.38
11.59
11.59
0.01
1.60
38.19
38.19
0.04
12.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
B enzo |g, h,i] pery lene
1,095
648
0.27
8.23
8.23
0.01
1.50
35.80
35.80
0.03
11.00
185
185
0.17
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.54
16.46
16.46
0.02
1.50
35.80
35.80
0.04
18.00
304
304
0.3094
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.39
11.89
11.89
0.01
0.96
22.91
22.91
0.02
12.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
1.50
45.73
45.73
0.06
3.20
76.37
76.37
0.10
84.00
1417
1417
1.84
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.24
7.32
7.32
0.01
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
12.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
1.20
36.59
36.59
0.08
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
170
2867
2867
6.46
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
1.10
33.54
33.54
0.05
0.99
23.63
23.63
0.04
77.00
1298
1298
1.94
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.48
11.46
11.46
0.01
12.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.51
15.55
15.55
--
1.30
31.03
31.03
--
24.00
405
405
--
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
12.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
1.40
42.68
42.68
0.08
0.42
10.02
10.02
0.02
150
2530
2530
4.96
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
~
0.51
15.55
15.55
0.02
0.67
15.99
15.99
0.02
27.00
455
455
0.61
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
~
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
12.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
~
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.43
10.26
10.26
0.011
12.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
12.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
--
0.70
21.34
21.34
0.04
0.35
8.35
8.35
0.01
57.00
961
961
1.65
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.30
9.15
9.15
0.01
0.46
10.98
10.98
0.01
12.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
~
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
12.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.24
7.32
7.32
0.01
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
12.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
12.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.76
23.17
23.17
0.03
2.00
47.73
47.73
0.06
31.00
523
523
0.619
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.08
2.44
2.44
0.002
0.45
10.74
10.74
0.010
3.10
52.28
52.28
0.0466
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
1.80
54.88
54.88
0.08
3.60
85.92
85.92
0.12
72.00
1214
1214
1.717
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.52
15.85
15.85
0.03
0.19
4.53
4.53
0.008
53.00
894
894
1.661
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
1,115
--
0.26
7.93
7.93
0.01
1.30
31.03
31.03
0.028
11.00
185
185
0.1664
Naphthalene
385
61,700
1.50
45.73
45.73
0.12
0.24
5.73
5.73
0.015
270
4553
4553
11.826
Perylene
967
431
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.55
13.13
13.13
0.014
12.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
2.30
70.12
70.12
0.12
1.60
38.19
38.19
0.06
170
2867
2867
4.810
Pyrene
697
9,090
1.90
57.93
57.93
0.08
3.40
81.15
81.15
0.12
100
1686
1686
2.419
—
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
1.05
--
--
--
1.01
--
--
--
48.09
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH
concentration in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the
contribution up to the maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D
ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section
6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 20 of 42
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-15
RB15-15
Sample Name:
RB15-15-1020
RB15-15-2040
Sample Date:
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
1-2
2-4
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
1.94
0.0194
--
--
4.21
0.0421
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
--
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
11.00
567
567
1.27
110
2613
2613
5.86
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
15.00
773
773
1.73
150
3563
3563
7.97
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
8.20
423
423
0.86
88.00
2090
2090
4.26
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.24
12.37
12.37
0.03
3.30
78.38
78.38
0.17
Anthracene
594
1,300
5.80
299
299
0.50
55.00
1306
1300
2.19
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
2.40
124
124
0.15
32.00
760
760
0.90
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
1.70
87.63
87.63
0.09
23.00
546
546
0.57
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.99
51.03
51.03
0.05
11.00
261
261
0.27
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
B enzo |g, h,i] pery lene
1,095
648
0.77
39.69
39.69
0.04
9.20
219
219
0.20
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
1.10
56.70
56.70
0.06
14.00
333
333
0.34
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
21.00
499
499
0.54
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
5.00
258
258
0.33
93.00
2209
2209
2.87
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
22.00
523
523
0.86
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
16.00
825
825
1.86
170
4038
4038
9.09
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
4.90
253
253
0.38
93.00
2209
2209
3.30
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
1.00
0.00
0.00
--
34.00
808
808
--
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
11.00
567
567
1.11
180
4276
4276
8.38
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
40.00
950
950
1.27
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
~
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
--
3.60
186
186
0.32
74.00
1758
1758
3.03
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
21.00
499
499
0.60
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
~
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
2.10
108
108
0.13
27.00
641
641
0.76
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.24
12.37
12.37
0.01
3.30
78.38
78.38
0.070
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
4.90
253
253
0.36
52.00
1235
1235
1.75
Fluorene
538
26,000
4.10
211
211
0.39
41.00
974
974
1.810
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
1,115
--
0.71
36.60
36.60
0.03
8.20
195
195
0.17
Naphthalene
385
61,700
20.00
1031
1031
2.68
210
4988
4988
12.956
Perylene
967
431
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
13.00
670
670
1.12
150
3563
3563
5.98
Pyrene
697
9,090
6.80
351
351
0.50
99.00
2352
2352
3.37
—
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
11.00
--
--
--
65.70
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH
concentration in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the
contribution up to the maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D
ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section
6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 21 of 42
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-15
RB15-15
Sample Name:
RB15-15-2040FD
RB15-15-4060
Sample Date:
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
2-4
4-6
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
4.71
0.0471
--
--
1.75
0.0175
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
--
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
79.00
1677
1677
3.76
0.90
51.43
51.43
0.12
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
100
2123
2123
4.750
1.20
68.57
68.57
0.153
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
63.00
1338
1338
2.724
0.93
53.14
53.14
0.108
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
2.40
50.96
50.96
0.113
0.04
2.06
2.06
0.005
Anthracene
594
1,300
37.00
786
786
1.32
0.67
38.29
38.29
0.064
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
22.00
467
467
0.56
0.42
24.00
24.00
0.03
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
15.00
318
318
0.33
0.36
20.57
20.57
0.02
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
6.70
142
142
0.145
0.20
11.43
11.43
0.012
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
8.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.23
13.14
13.14
0.01
B enzo |g, h,i] pery lene
1,095
648
5.70
121
121
0.111
0.19
10.86
10.86
0.01
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
8.70
185
185
0.19
0.20
11.43
11.43
0.012
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
8.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.25
14.29
14.29
0.02
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
67.00
1423
1423
1.85
0.99
56.57
56.57
0.07
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
8.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
120
2548
2548
5.74
1.30
74.29
74.29
0.17
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
71.00
1507
1507
2.25
0.85
48.57
48.57
0.07
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
8.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
25.00
531
531
"
0.39
22.29
22.29
--
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
8.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
130
2760
2760
5.412
1.60
91.43
91.43
0.18
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
28.00
594
594
0.797
0.42
24.00
24.00
0.03
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
~
8.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
--
8.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
8.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
54.00
1146
1146
1.973
0.83
47.43
47.43
0.08
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
8.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.24
13.71
13.71
0.02
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
~
8.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
--
8.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.26
14.86
14.86
0.02
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
8.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
18.00
382
382
0.45
0.37
21.14
21.14
0.03
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
1.90
40.34
40.34
0.036
0.05
2.63
2.63
0.002
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
34.00
722
722
1.02
0.84
48.00
48.00
0.07
Fluorene
538
26,000
29.00
616
616
1.144
0.47
26.86
26.86
0.050
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
1,115
--
4.90
104
104
0.093
0.13
7.43
7.43
0.007
Naphthalene
385
61,700
150
3185
3185
8.27
2.10
120
120
0.31
Perylene
967
431
8.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
110
2335
2335
3.92
1.90
109
109
0.18
Pyrene
697
9,090
69.00
1465
1465
2.10
1.40
80.00
80.00
0.11
—
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
40.55
--
--
--
1.70
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH
concentration in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the
contribution up to the maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D
ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section
6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 22 of 42
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-16
RB15-16
Sample Name:
RB15-16-SURF
RB15-16-0010
Sample Date:
11/2/2015
11/4/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
4.56
0.0456
--
--
6.16
0.0616
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
--
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.28
0.00
0.00
0.00
17.00
276
276
0.62
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.11
2.41
2.41
0.01
10.00
162
162
0.36
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.37
8.11
8.11
0.017
20.00
325
325
0.66
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.26
5.70
5.70
0.013
1.30
21.10
21.10
0.05
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.74
16.23
16.23
0.03
19.00
308
308
0.52
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
3.60
78.95
78.95
0.09
15.00
244
244
0.29
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
3.30
72.37
72.37
0.07
11.00
179
179
0.19
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
2.10
46.05
46.05
0.05
6.50
106
106
0.11
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
2.30
50.44
50.44
0.05
7.00
114
114
0.12
B enzo |g, h,i] pery lene
1,095
648
1.90
41.67
41.67
0.04
5.10
82.79
82.79
0.08
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
2.00
43.86
43.86
0.04
7.80
127
127
0.13
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
1.60
35.09
35.09
0.04
6.90
112
112
0.12
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
6.10
134
134
0.17
30.00
487
487
0.63
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.28
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.50
73.05
73.05
0.12
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.28
0.00
0.00
0.00
17.00
276
276
0.62
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
2.10
46.05
46.05
0.07
23.00
373
373
0.56
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.62
13.60
13.60
0.01
2.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
2.00
43.86
43.86
--
8.20
133
133
--
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.28
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
0.28
0.00
0.00
0.00
31.00
503
503
0.99
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
1.20
26.32
26.32
0.04
9.50
154
154
0.21
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
~
0.28
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
--
0.28
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.28
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
0.55
12.06
12.06
0.02
16.00
260
260
0.45
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.65
14.25
14.25
0.02
4.60
74.68
74.68
0.09
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
~
0.28
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
--
0.28
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.28
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
3.00
65.79
65.79
0.08
13.00
211
211
0.25
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.55
12.06
12.06
0.01
1.70
27.60
27.60
0.02
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
4.40
96.49
96.49
0.14
26.00
422
422
0.60
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.26
5.70
5.70
0.011
12.00
195
195
0.36
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
1,115
--
1.60
35.09
35.09
0.03
4.90
79.55
79.55
0.07
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.23
5.04
5.04
0.013
17.00
276
276
0.72
Perylene
967
431
0.67
14.69
14.69
0.02
2.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
2.00
43.86
43.86
0.07
45.00
731
731
1.23
Pyrene
697
9,090
7.60
167
167
0.24
38.00
617
617
0.89
—
ESBTU FCVi
—
—
—
1.38
--
--
--
10.05
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH
concentration in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the
contribution up to the maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D
ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section
6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 23 of 42
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-16
RB15-16
Sample Name:
RB15-16-1030
RB15-16-3040
Sample Date:
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
1-3
3-4
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
6.96
0.0696
--
--
7.76
0.0776
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
--
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
300
4310
4310
9.66
360.00
4639.18
4639.18
10.40
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
410
5891
5891
13.18
410.00
5283.51
5283.51
11.82
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
270
3879
3879
7.90
280.00
3608.25
3608.25
7.35
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
9.50
136
136
0.302
10.00
128.87
128.87
0.29
Anthracene
594
1,300
190
2730
1300
2.19
210.00
2706.19
1300.00
2.19
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
100
1437
1437
1.71
87.00
1121.13
1121.13
1.33
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
77.00
1106
1106
1.15
64.00
824.74
824.74
0.85
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
40.00
575
575
0.59
23.00
296.39
296.39
0.30
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
48.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
49.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
B enzo |g, h,i] pery lene
1,095
648
31.00
445
445
0.41
24.00
309.28
309.28
0.28
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
49.00
704
704
0.72
44.00
567.01
567.01
0.58
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
48.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
49.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
240
3448
3448
4.48
270.00
3479.38
3479.38
4.52
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
48.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
49.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
450
6466
6466
14.56
560.00
7216.49
7216.49
16.25
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
230
3305
3305
4.93
270.00
3479.38
3479.38
5.19
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
48.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
49.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
48.50
0.00
0.00
--
49.00
0.00
0.00
--
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
48.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
49.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
450
6466
6466
12.68
560.00
7216.49
7216.49
14.15
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
48.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
120.00
1546.39
1546.39
2.07
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
~
48.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
49.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
--
48.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
49.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
48.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
49.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
170
2443
2443
4.20
220.00
2835.05
2835.05
4.88
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
48.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
49.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
~
48.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
49.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
--
48.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
49.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
48.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
49.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
86.00
1236
826
0.98
80.00
1030.93
826.00
0.98
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
9.00
129
129
0.12
49.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
200
2874
2874
4.06
150.00
1932.99
1932.99
2.73
Fluorene
538
26,000
150
2155
2155
4.01
140.00
1804.12
1804.12
3.35
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
1,115
--
29.00
417
417
0.37
18.00
231.96
231.96
0.21
Naphthalene
385
61,700
700
10057
10057
26.12
700.00
9020.62
9020.62
23.43
Perylene
967
431
48.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
49.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
510
7328
7328
12.29
450.00
5798.97
5798.97
9.73
Pyrene
697
9,090
300
4310
4310
6.18
280.00
3608.25
3608.25
5.18
—
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
109.95
--
--
--
105.85
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH
concentration in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the
contribution up to the maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D
ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section
6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 24 of 42
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-16
RB15-17
RB15-17
Sample Name:
RB15-16-4060
RB15-17-SURF
RB15-17-0010
Sample Date:
11/4/2015
11/2/2015
11/3/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
4-6
0-0.5
0-1
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
1.99
0.0199
--
--
1.41
0.0141
--
--
1.38
0.0138
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
--
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
3.40
171
171
0.38
0.02
1.42
1.42
0.003
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
3.60
181
181
0.40
0.01
0.66
0.66
0.001
0.05
3.62
3.62
0.01
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
2.60
131
131
0.27
0.12
8.51
8.51
0.02
0.61
44.20
44.20
0.09
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.55
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.45
0.45
0.001
0.10
7.03
7.03
0.02
Anthracene
594
1,300
1.20
60.30
60.30
0.10
0.04
2.84
2.84
0.005
1.50
109
109
0.18
Benzo[a]anthracene
841
4,153
0.62
31.16
31.16
0.04
0.08
5.96
5.96
0.01
1.80
130
130
0.16
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.49
24.62
24.62
0.03
0.08
5.39
5.39
0.01
1.10
79.71
79.71
0.08
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.20
10.05
10.05
0.01
0.06
4.18
4.18
0.004
0.85
61.59
61.59
0.06
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.55
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
4.33
4.33
0.004
0.75
54.35
54.35
0.06
B enzo |g, h,i] pery lene
1,095
648
0.25
12.56
12.56
0.01
0.07
4.89
4.89
0.004
0.58
42.03
42.03
0.04
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.37
18.59
18.59
0.02
0.06
4.26
4.26
0.004
0.82
59.42
59.42
0.06
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.55
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
1.70
1.70
0.002
0.83
60.14
60.14
0.06
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
1.40
70.35
70.35
0.09
0.04
2.98
2.98
0.004
3.70
268
268
0.35
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.55
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.43
31.16
31.16
0.05
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
5.00
251
251
0.57
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
1.40
70.35
70.35
0.11
0.04
2.91
2.91
0.004
2.80
203
203
0.30
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.55
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.36
26.09
26.09
0.03
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.55
0.00
0.00
"
0.01
0.00
0.00
--
1.50
109
109
--
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.55
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.44
31.88
31.88
0.05
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
3.20
161
161
0.32
0.02
1.42
1.42
0.003
1.10
79.71
79.71
0.16
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
0.55
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
2.77
2.77
0.004
1.50
109
109
0.15
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.55
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
~
0.55
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.41
29.71
29.71
0.03
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.55
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
--
1.20
60.30
60.30
0.10
0.03
2.34
2.34
0.004
1.60
116
116
0.20
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.55
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
1.91
1.91
0.002
0.66
47.83
47.83
0.06
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
~
0.55
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.55
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
1.06
1.06
0.002
0.57
41.30
41.30
0.06
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.55
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.29
21.01
21.01
0.02
Chrysene
844
826
0.60
30.15
30.15
0.04
0.09
6.67
6.67
0.01
1.50
109
109
0.13
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.55
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
1.06
1.06
0.001
0.20
14.49
14.49
0.01
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
1.20
60.30
60.30
0.09
0.18
12.77
12.77
0.02
3.30
239
239
0.34
Fluorene
538
26,000
1.10
55.28
55.28
0.10
0.03
2.06
2.06
0.004
0.48
34.78
34.78
0.06
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
1,115
--
0.18
9.05
9.05
0.01
0.05
3.19
3.19
0.003
0.57
41.30
41.30
0.04
Naphthalene
385
61,700
15.00
754
754
1.96
0.01
0.70
0.70
0.002
0.09
6.30
6.30
0.02
Perylene
967
431
0.55
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
2.06
2.06
0.002
0.28
20.29
20.29
0.02
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
3.00
151
151
0.25
0.13
9.22
9.22
0.02
2.70
196
196
0.33
Pyrene
697
9,090
1.70
85.43
85.43
0.12
0.20
14.18
14.18
0.02
3.80
275
275
0.40
—
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
4.22
--
--
--
0.15
--
--
--
3.56
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH
concentration in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the
contribution up to the maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D
ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section
6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 25 of 42
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-17
RB15-18
RB15-18
Sample Name:
RB15-17-1030
RB15-18-SURF
RB15-18-0010
Sample Date:
11/3/2015
11/1/2015
11/2/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
1-3
0-0.5
0-1
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
1.61
0.0161
--
--
1.24
0.0124
--
--
3.24
0.0324
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
--
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.004
0.27
0.27
0.001
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.48
0.00
0.00
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.005
0.29
0.29
0.001
0.21
16.94
16.94
0.04
0.13
4.01
4.01
0.009
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.01
0.53
0.53
0.00
0.72
58.06
58.06
0.12
0.55
16.98
16.98
0.035
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.003
0.17
0.17
0.0004
0.09
7.34
7.34
0.02
0.26
8.02
8.02
0.018
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.01
0.81
0.81
0.00
0.82
66.13
66.13
0.11
2.20
67.90
67.90
0.11
Benzo[a]anthracene
841
4,153
0.02
1.12
1.12
0.00
1.70
137
137
0.16
4.50
139
139
0.17
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.01
0.81
0.81
0.00
1.60
129
129
0.13
4.10
127
127
0.13
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.02
0.93
0.93
0.00
1.30
105
105
0.11
2.80
86.42
86.42
0.09
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.02
0.99
0.99
0.00
1.00
80.65
80.65
0.08
2.60
80.25
80.25
0.08
B enzo |g, h,i] pery lene
1,095
648
0.01
0.62
0.62
0.00
0.76
61.29
61.29
0.06
2.20
67.90
67.90
0.06
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.01
0.57
0.57
0.00
1.00
80.65
80.65
0.08
2.60
80.25
80.25
0.08
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.04
2.24
2.24
0.00
0.74
59.68
59.68
0.06
1.70
52.47
52.47
0.06
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
0.06
3.73
3.73
0.00
3.00
242
242
0.31
7.00
216
216
0.28
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.02
1.37
1.37
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.48
0.00
0.00
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.01
0.45
0.45
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.48
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.11
6.83
6.83
0.01
1.60
129
129
0.19
3.10
95.68
95.68
0.14
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.05
2.86
2.86
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.48
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.06
3.91
3.91
"
1.20
96.77
96.77
--
2.50
77.16
77.16
--
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.04
2.36
2.36
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.48
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
0.05
3.17
3.17
0.01
1.10
88.71
88.71
0.17
0.48
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
0.13
8.07
8.07
0.01
0.85
68.55
68.55
0.09
1.90
58.64
58.64
0.08
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.03
2.05
2.05
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.48
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
~
0.07
4.10
4.10
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.48
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.06
3.42
3.42
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.48
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
--
0.20
12.42
12.42
0.02
1.10
88.71
88.71
0.15
1.20
37.04
37.04
0.06
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.14
8.70
8.70
0.01
0.52
41.94
41.94
0.05
1.00
30.86
30.86
0.04
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
~
0.02
1.06
1.06
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.48
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.26
16.15
16.15
0.02
0.47
37.90
37.90
0.06
0.48
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.10
5.90
5.90
0.01
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.48
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.03
2.05
2.05
0.00
1.50
121
121
0.14
3.80
117
117
0.14
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.003
0.20
0.20
0.0002
0.23
18.55
18.55
0.017
0.62
19.14
19.14
0.017
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.03
1.68
1.68
0.00
3.30
266
266
0.38
8.50
262
262
0.37
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.01
0.43
0.43
0.00
0.39
31.45
31.45
0.06
0.38
11.73
11.73
0.022
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
1,115
--
0.01
0.34
0.34
0.00
0.76
61.29
61.29
0.05
2.00
61.73
61.73
0.06
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.003
0.21
0.21
0.001
0.48
38.71
38.71
0.10
0.19
5.86
5.86
0.015
Perylene
967
431
0.01
0.60
0.60
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
30.86
30.86
0.03
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.04
2.61
2.61
0.00
2.40
194
194
0.32
2.90
89.51
89.51
0.15
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.04
2.42
2.42
0.00
3.40
274
274
0.39
11.00
340
340
0.49
—
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
0.13
--
--
--
3.44
--
--
--
2.73
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH
concentration in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the
contribution up to the maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D
ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section
6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 26 of 42
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-19
RB15-19
RB15-19
Sample Name:
RB15-19-SURF
RB15-19-0010
RB15-19-1030
Sample Date:
11/2/2015
11/3/2015
11/3/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
1.27
0.0127
--
--
2.79
0.0279
--
--
2.62
0.0262
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
--
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.22
0.22
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.12
9.45
9.45
0.02
0.56
20.07
20.07
0.04
0.01
0.24
0.24
0.00
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.39
30.71
30.71
0.06
2.00
71.68
71.68
0.15
0.01
0.35
0.35
0.00
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.21
16.54
16.54
0.04
0.41
14.70
14.70
0.03
0.00
0.10
0.10
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.67
52.76
52.76
0.09
3.40
122
122
0.21
0.01
0.50
0.50
0.00
Benzo[a]anthracene
841
4,153
3.40
268
268
0.32
9.10
326
326
0.39
0.03
0.99
0.99
0.00
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
3.00
236
236
0.24
6.70
240
240
0.25
0.02
0.80
0.80
0.00
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
1.90
150
150
0.15
5.70
204
204
0.21
0.02
0.84
0.84
0.00
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
2.00
157
157
0.16
4.50
161
161
0.17
0.02
0.73
0.73
0.00
B enzo |g, h,i] pery lene
1,095
648
1.60
126
126
0.12
3.40
122
122
0.11
0.02
0.76
0.76
0.00
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
1.90
150
150
0.15
5.20
186
186
0.19
0.02
0.57
0.57
0.00
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
1.60
126
126
0.14
4.30
154
154
0.17
0.03
1.11
1.11
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
6.30
496
496
0.64
13.00
466
466
0.61
0.05
2.06
2.06
0.00
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.38
0.38
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.29
0.29
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
1.70
134
134
0.20
5.20
186
186
0.28
0.06
2.10
2.10
0.00
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.72
56.69
56.69
0.06
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.84
0.84
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
2.30
181
181
--
6.00
215
215
--
0.05
2.06
2.06
"
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.65
0.65
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
0.61
48.03
48.03
0.09
2.30
82.44
82.44
0.16
0.03
1.11
1.11
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
1.30
102
102
0.14
2.80
100
100
0.13
0.07
2.79
2.79
0.00
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.80
0.80
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
~
0.64
50.39
50.39
0.05
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
1.41
1.41
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
1.03
1.03
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
--
0.59
46.46
46.46
0.08
2.40
86.02
86.02
0.15
0.08
3.21
3.21
0.01
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.76
59.84
59.84
0.07
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.08
3.17
3.17
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
~
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.73
0.73
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.10
3.82
3.82
0.01
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
2.40
2.40
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
2.90
228
228
0.27
7.60
272
272
0.32
0.03
1.26
1.26
0.00
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.41
32.28
32.28
0.03
1.30
46.59
46.59
0.04
0.00
0.15
0.15
0.00
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
4.30
339
339
0.48
17.00
609
609
0.86
0.04
1.60
1.60
0.00
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.33
25.98
25.98
0.05
2.20
78.85
78.85
0.15
0.01
0.38
0.38
0.00
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
1,115
--
1.40
110
110
0.10
3.70
133
133
0.12
0.01
0.37
0.37
0.00
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.16
12.60
12.60
0.03
1.20
43.01
43.01
0.11
0.01
0.35
0.35
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.60
47.24
47.24
0.05
1.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.46
0.46
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
1.70
134
134
0.22
11.00
394
394
0.66
0.03
1.07
1.07
0.00
Pyrene
697
9,090
6.20
488
488
0.70
18.00
645
645
0.93
0.04
1.60
1.60
0.00
—
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
4.74
--
--
--
6.38
--
--
--
0.05
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH
concentration in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the
contribution up to the maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D
ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section
6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 27 of 42
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-20
RB15-20
RB15-20
Sample Name:
RB15-20-SURF
RB15-20-0010
RB15-20-1020
Sample Date:
11/4/2015
11/5/2015
11/5/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
1-2
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
5.18
0.0518
--
--
7.72
0.0772
--
--
12.3
0.123
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
--
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.50
9.65
9.65
0.02
3.50
45.34
45.34
0.10
7.10
57.72
57.72
0.13
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.35
6.76
6.76
0.02
2.80
36.27
36.27
0.08
5.50
44.72
44.72
0.10
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.41
7.92
7.92
0.02
1.30
16.84
16.84
0.03
2.30
18.70
18.70
0.04
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.27
5.21
5.21
0.01
0.50
6.48
6.48
0.01
1.10
8.94
8.94
0.02
Anthracene
594
1,300
1.00
19.31
19.31
0.03
2.10
27.20
27.20
0.05
3.50
28.46
28.46
0.05
Benzo[a]anthracene
841
4,153
2.60
50.19
50.19
0.06
4.70
60.88
60.88
0.07
6.50
52.85
52.85
0.06
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
2.50
48.26
48.26
0.05
3.20
41.45
41.45
0.04
4.70
38.21
38.21
0.04
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
2.00
38.61
38.61
0.04
3.30
42.75
42.75
0.04
4.30
34.96
34.96
0.04
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
1.80
34.75
34.75
0.04
3.00
38.86
38.86
0.04
4.20
34.15
34.15
0.04
B enzo |g, h,i] pery lene
1,095
648
1.30
25.10
25.10
0.02
1.70
22.02
22.02
0.02
2.40
19.51
19.51
0.02
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
1.90
36.68
36.68
0.04
2.70
34.97
34.97
0.04
3.60
29.27
29.27
0.03
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
2.20
42.47
42.47
0.05
6.40
82.90
82.90
0.09
9.10
73.98
73.98
0.08
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
5.50
106
106
0.14
11.00
142
142
0.19
19.00
154
154
0.20
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.21
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.70
22.02
22.02
0.04
2.80
22.76
22.76
0.04
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.57
11.00
11.00
0.02
3.90
50.52
50.52
0.11
7.90
64.23
64.23
0.14
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
3.10
59.85
59.85
0.09
12.00
155
155
0.23
21.00
171
171
0.25
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
1.90
36.68
36.68
0.04
8.10
105
105
0.10
7.80
63.41
63.41
0.06
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
4.10
79.15
79.15
--
11.00
142
142
--
17.00
138
138
--
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.68
13.13
13.13
0.02
3.50
45.34
45.34
0.07
5.40
43.90
43.90
0.06
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
2.80
54.05
54.05
0.11
19.00
246
246
0.48
36.00
293
293
0.57
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
3.60
69.50
69.50
0.09
18.00
233
233
0.31
27.00
220
220
0.29
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
1.20
23.17
23.17
0.02
5.30
68.65
68.65
0.06
6.60
53.66
53.66
0.05
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
~
2.30
44.40
44.40
0.05
10.00
130
130
0.14
15.00
122
122
0.13
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
1.10
21.24
21.24
0.03
5.20
67.36
67.36
0.09
7.60
61.79
61.79
0.08
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
--
3.10
59.85
59.85
0.10
21.00
272
272
0.47
35.00
285
285
0.49
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
4.90
94.59
94.59
0.11
22.00
285
285
0.34
35.00
285
285
0.34
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
~
0.43
8.30
8.30
0.01
2.40
31.09
31.09
0.03
3.40
27.64
27.64
0.02
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
2.00
38.61
38.61
0.06
10.00
130
130
0.20
16.00
130
130
0.20
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
3.40
65.64
65.64
0.07
17.00
220
220
0.24
26.00
211
211
0.23
Chrysene
844
826
2.80
54.05
54.05
0.06
6.00
77.72
77.72
0.09
7.90
64.23
64.23
0.08
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.49
9.46
9.46
0.01
0.69
8.94
8.94
0.01
0.87
7.07
7.07
0.01
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
4.20
81.08
81.08
0.11
7.60
98.45
98.45
0.14
11.00
89.43
89.43
0.13
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.41
7.92
7.92
0.01
1.50
19.43
19.43
0.04
2.30
18.70
18.70
0.03
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
1,115
--
1.30
25.10
25.10
0.02
1.70
22.02
22.02
0.02
2.30
18.70
18.70
0.02
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.83
10.75
10.75
0.03
1.80
14.63
14.63
0.04
Perylene
967
431
0.59
11.39
11.39
0.01
0.80
10.36
10.36
0.01
0.60
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
2.50
48.26
48.26
0.08
8.20
106
106
0.18
13.00
106
106
0.18
Pyrene
697
9,090
4.70
90.73
90.73
0.13
8.60
111
111
0.16
14.00
114
114
0.16
—
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
1.71
--
--
--
4.05
--
--
--
4.08
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH
concentration in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the
contribution up to the maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D
ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section
6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 28 of 42
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-20
RB15-21
RB15-21
Sample Name:
RB15-20-2040
RB15-21-SURF
RB15-21-0010
Sample Date:
11/5/2015
11/4/2015
11/5/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
2-4
0-0.5
0-1
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
1.82
0.0182
--
--
1.1
0.011
--
--
2.29
0.0229
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
--
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.60
32.97
32.97
0.07
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.42
23.08
23.08
0.05
0.07
6.73
6.73
0.02
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.34
18.68
18.68
0.04
0.18
16.36
16.36
0.03
0.200
8.73
8.73
0.02
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.10
5.27
5.27
0.01
0.05
4.82
4.82
0.01
0.077
3.36
3.36
0.01
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.31
17.03
17.03
0.03
0.38
34.55
34.55
0.06
0.53
23.14
23.14
0.04
Benzo[a]anthracene
841
4,153
0.49
26.92
26.92
0.03
1.00
90.91
90.91
0.11
1.70
74.24
74.24
0.09
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.36
19.78
19.78
0.02
0.77
70.00
70.00
0.07
1.40
61.14
61.14
0.06
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.29
15.93
15.93
0.02
0.72
65.45
65.45
0.07
1.20
52.40
52.40
0.05
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.28
15.38
15.38
0.02
0.57
51.82
51.82
0.05
1.10
48.03
48.03
0.05
B enzo |g, h,i] pery lene
1,095
648
0.20
10.99
10.99
0.01
0.41
37.27
37.27
0.03
0.84
36.68
36.68
0.03
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.27
14.84
14.84
0.02
0.66
60.00
60.00
0.06
1.30
56.77
56.77
0.06
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.63
34.62
34.62
0.04
0.45
40.91
40.91
0.04
0.83
36.24
36.24
0.04
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
1.60
87.91
87.91
0.11
1.60
145
145
0.19
2.20
96.07
96.07
0.12
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.28
15.38
15.38
0.03
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.63
34.62
34.62
0.08
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
1.60
87.91
87.91
0.13
0.64
58.18
58.18
0.09
0.89
38.86
38.86
0.06
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.64
35.16
35.16
0.03
0.32
29.09
29.09
0.03
0.70
30.57
30.57
0.03
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
1.10
60.44
60.44
--
0.80
72.73
72.73
--
1.30
56.77
56.77
--
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.37
20.33
20.33
0.03
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
2.70
148
148
0.29
0.36
32.73
32.73
0.06
0.37
16.16
16.16
0.03
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
1.70
93.41
93.41
0.13
0.43
39.09
39.09
0.05
0.68
29.69
29.69
0.04
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.34
18.68
18.68
0.02
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.45
19.65
19.65
0.02
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
~
0.79
43.41
43.41
0.05
0.35
31.82
31.82
0.03
0.79
34.50
34.50
0.04
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.45
24.73
24.73
0.03
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
--
2.70
148
148
0.26
0.38
34.55
34.55
0.06
0.38
16.59
16.59
0.03
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
1.90
104
104
0.13
0.39
35.45
35.45
0.04
0.75
32.75
32.75
0.04
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
~
0.16
8.79
8.79
0.01
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
1.30
71.43
71.43
0.11
0.18
16.36
16.36
0.02
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
1.30
71.43
71.43
0.08
0.20
18.18
18.18
0.02
0.51
22.27
22.27
0.02
Chrysene
844
826
0.53
29.12
29.12
0.03
0.93
84.55
84.55
0.10
1.60
69.87
69.87
0.08
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.07
4.01
4.01
0.00
0.15
13.64
13.64
0.01
0.280
12.23
12.23
0.01
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.91
50.00
50.00
0.07
1.90
173
173
0.24
3.10
135
135
0.19
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.24
13.19
13.19
0.02
0.19
17.27
17.27
0.03
0.25
10.92
10.92
0.02
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
1,115
--
0.17
9.34
9.34
0.01
0.42
38.18
38.18
0.03
0.80
34.93
34.93
0.03
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.18
9.89
9.89
0.03
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.065
0.00
0.00
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.21
19.09
19.09
0.02
0.40
17.47
17.47
0.02
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
1.10
60.44
60.44
0.10
1.10
100
100
0.17
1.90
82.97
82.97
0.14
Pyrene
697
9,090
1.30
71.43
71.43
0.10
2.10
191
191
0.27
3.20
140
140
0.20
—
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
2.03
--
--
--
2.03
--
--
--
1.57
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH
concentration in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the
contribution up to the maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D
ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section
6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 29 of 42
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
RB15-21
RB15-22
RB15-22
RB15-21-1020
RB15-22-SURF
RB15-22-0010
11/5/2015
11/3/2015
11/4/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
1-2
0-0.5
0-1
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
8.45
0.0845
--
--
4
0.04
--
--
2.51
0.0251
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
--
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.43
0.00
0.00
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.09
2.25
2.25
0.01
0.32
12.75
12.75
0.03
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.61
7.22
7.22
0.01
0.14
3.50
3.50
0.01
0.540
21.51
21.51
0.04
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.17
2.01
2.01
0.004
0.09
2.33
2.33
0.01
0.190
7.57
7.57
0.02
Anthracene
594
1,300
1.60
18.93
18.93
0.03
0.43
10.75
10.75
0.02
0.98
39.04
39.04
0.07
Benzo[a]anthracene
841
4,153
4.20
49.70
49.70
0.06
1.40
35.00
35.00
0.04
2.90
116
116
0.14
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
3.30
39.05
39.05
0.04
1.30
32.50
32.50
0.03
2.60
104
104
0.11
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
2.30
27.22
27.22
0.03
1.20
30.00
30.00
0.03
2.20
87.65
87.65
0.09
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
3.40
40.24
40.24
0.04
0.93
23.25
23.25
0.02
1.90
75.70
75.70
0.08
B enzo |g, h,i] pery lene
1,095
648
2.10
24.85
24.85
0.02
0.78
19.50
19.50
0.02
1.30
51.79
51.79
0.05
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
2.20
26.04
26.04
0.03
1.00
25.00
25.00
0.03
2.10
83.67
83.67
0.09
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
6.60
78.11
78.11
0.08
0.74
18.50
18.50
0.02
1.30
51.79
51.79
0.06
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
15.00
178
178
0.23
1.80
45.00
45.00
0.06
4.30
171
171
0.22
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.43
0.00
0.00
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.43
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
9.60
114
114
0.17
0.67
16.75
16.75
0.03
2.10
83.67
83.67
0.12
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
7.10
84.02
84.02
0.08
0.32
8.00
8.00
0.01
0.43
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
15.00
178
178
--
0.94
23.50
23.50
--
1.80
71.71
71.71
--
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
2.30
27.22
27.22
0.04
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.43
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
4.80
56.80
56.80
0.11
0.33
8.25
8.25
0.02
1.80
71.71
71.71
0.14
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
~
12.00
142
142
0.19
0.46
11.50
11.50
0.02
1.70
67.73
67.73
0.09
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
5.90
69.82
69.82
0.06
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.43
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
~
11.00
130
130
0.14
0.32
8.00
8.00
0.01
0.43
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
3.10
36.69
36.69
0.05
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.43
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
7.80
92.31
92.31
0.16
0.33
8.25
8.25
0.01
3.30
131
131
0.23
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
13.00
154
154
0.19
0.34
8.50
8.50
0.01
1.40
55.78
55.78
0.07
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
4.60
54.44
54.44
0.04
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.43
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
4.50
53.25
53.25
0.08
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.40
55.78
55.78
0.08
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
8.70
103
103
0.11
0.13
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.43
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
4.90
57.99
57.99
0.07
1.40
35.00
35.00
0.04
2.70
108
108
0.13
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.69
8.17
8.17
0.01
0.28
7.00
7.00
0.01
0.480
19.12
19.12
0.02
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
6.40
75.74
75.74
0.11
2.50
62.50
62.50
0.09
5.40
215
215
0.30
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.74
8.76
8.76
0.02
0.17
4.25
4.25
0.01
0.510
20.32
20.32
0.04
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
1,115
--
1.50
17.75
17.75
0.02
0.79
19.75
19.75
0.02
1.30
51.79
51.79
0.05
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.11
2.75
2.75
0.01
2.000
79.68
79.68
0.21
Perylene
967
431
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.33
8.25
8.25
0.01
0.43
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
6.20
73.37
73.37
0.12
1.30
32.50
32.50
0.05
3.70
147
147
0.25
Pyrene
697
9,090
9.50
112
112
0.16
2.40
60.00
60.00
0.09
5.80
231
231
0.33
—
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
2.42
--
--
--
0.70
--
--
--
3.00
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH
concentration in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the
contribution up to the maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D
ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section
6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 30 of 42
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-22
RB15-22
RB15-22
Sample Name:
RB15-22-1020
RB15-22-2030
RB15-22-3050
Sample Date:
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
1-2
2-3
3-5
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
5.02
0.0502
--
--
9.52
0.0952
--
--
8.76
0.0876
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
--
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.42
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.26
5.18
5.18
0.01
0.71
7.46
7.46
0.02
1.40
15.98
15.98
0.04
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.62
12.35
12.35
0.03
3.10
32.56
32.56
0.07
6.20
70.78
70.78
0.14
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.45
8.96
8.96
0.02
0.87
9.14
9.14
0.02
1.800
20.55
20.55
0.05
Anthracene
594
1,300
1.80
35.86
35.86
0.06
6.80
71.43
71.43
0.12
13.00
148
148
0.25
Benzo[a]anthracene
841
4,153
5.30
106
106
0.13
11.00
116
116
0.14
28.00
320
320
0.38
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
5.00
99.60
99.60
0.10
7.40
77.73
77.73
0.08
22.00
251
251
0.26
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
3.70
73.71
73.71
0.08
5.40
56.72
56.72
0.06
13.00
148
148
0.15
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
3.50
69.72
69.72
0.07
5.50
57.77
57.77
0.06
16.00
183
183
0.19
B enzo |g, h,i] pery lene
1,095
648
2.30
45.82
45.82
0.04
3.40
35.71
35.71
0.03
11.00
126
126
0.11
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
3.50
69.72
69.72
0.07
5.10
53.57
53.57
0.05
16.00
183
183
0.19
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
3.20
63.75
63.75
0.07
8.70
91.39
91.39
0.10
20.00
228
228
0.25
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
10.00
199
199
0.26
23.00
242
242
0.31
61.00
696
696
0.90
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.42
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.10
22.06
22.06
0.04
2.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.42
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
5.80
116
116
0.17
17.00
179
179
0.27
39.00
445
445
0.66
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
2.40
47.81
47.81
0.05
3.60
37.82
37.82
0.04
8.20
93.61
93.61
0.09
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
5.30
106
106
--
11.00
116
116
--
30.00
342
342
--
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
1.30
25.90
25.90
0.04
2.70
28.36
28.36
0.04
5.00
57.08
57.08
0.08
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
4.30
85.66
85.66
0.17
12.00
126
126
0.25
19.00
217
217
0.43
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
6.70
133
133
0.18
13.00
137
137
0.18
28.00
320
320
0.43
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
1.50
29.88
29.88
0.03
2.10
22.06
22.06
0.020
5.30
60.50
60.50
0.05
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
~
3.00
59.76
59.76
0.06
5.30
55.67
55.67
0.059
9.90
113
113
0.12
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
1.70
33.86
33.86
0.04
2.80
29.41
29.41
0.038
5.30
60.50
60.50
0.08
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
8.50
169
169
0.29
12.00
126
126
0.22
22.00
251
251
0.43
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
7.90
157
157
0.19
12.00
126
126
0.15
21.00
240
240
0.29
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
0.42
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
2.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
4.60
91.63
91.63
0.14
5.70
59.87
59.87
0.09
9.60
110
110
0.17
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
4.60
91.63
91.63
0.10
6.70
70.38
70.38
0.08
11.00
126
126
0.14
Chrysene
844
826
5.00
99.60
99.60
0.12
9.60
101
101
0.12
26.00
297
297
0.35
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.75
14.94
14.94
0.01
1.30
13.66
13.66
0.012
4.30
49.09
49.09
0.04
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
8.60
171
171
0.24
16.00
168
168
0.24
41.00
468
468
0.66
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.69
13.75
13.75
0.03
3.00
31.51
31.51
0.059
5.20
59.36
59.36
0.11
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
1,115
--
2.10
41.83
41.83
0.04
3.20
33.61
33.61
0.030
9.40
107
107
0.10
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.30
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.800
0.00
0.00
0.00
Perylene
967
431
1.10
21.91
21.91
0.02
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
5.00
57.08
57.08
0.06
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
5.90
118
118
0.20
18.00
189
189
0.32
37.00
422
422
0.71
Pyrene
697
9,090
12.00
239
239
0.34
20.00
210
210
0.30
52.00
594
594
0.85
—
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
3.30
--
--
--
3.50
--
--
--
8.56
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH
concentration in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the
contribution up to the maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D
ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section
6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 31 of 42
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-23
RB15-23
Sample Name:
RB15-23-SURF
RB15-23-0010
Sample Date:
11/3/2015
11/5/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
2.6
0.026
--
--
12.2
0.122
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
--
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.20
34.43
34.43
0.08
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.09
3.62
3.62
0.01
0.43
0.00
0.00
0.00
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.15
5.77
5.77
0.01
4.80
39.34
39.34
0.08
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.06
2.15
2.15
0.00
1.10
9.02
9.02
0.02
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.42
16.15
16.15
0.03
10.00
81.97
81.97
0.14
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
1.30
50.00
50.00
0.06
14.00
115
115
0.14
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
1.10
42.31
42.31
0.04
9.60
78.69
78.69
0.08
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
1.10
42.31
42.31
0.04
5.90
48.36
48.36
0.05
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.88
33.85
33.85
0.04
7.20
59.02
59.02
0.06
B enzo |g, h,i] pery lene
1,095
648
0.64
24.62
24.62
0.02
4.60
37.70
37.70
0.03
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.92
35.38
35.38
0.04
6.80
55.74
55.74
0.06
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.53
20.38
20.38
0.02
12.00
98.36
98.36
0.11
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
1.40
53.85
53.85
0.07
34.00
279
279
0.36
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.30
27.05
27.05
0.04
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.10
25.41
25.41
0.06
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.46
17.69
17.69
0.03
29.00
238
238
0.35
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
6.10
50.00
50.00
0.05
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.72
27.69
27.69
--
16.00
131
131
--
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.80
31.15
31.15
0.05
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
0.27
10.38
10.38
0.02
18.00
148
148
0.29
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
0.31
11.92
11.92
0.02
19.00
156
156
0.21
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.50
28.69
28.69
0.03
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
~
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
7.70
63.11
63.11
0.07
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.30
27.05
27.05
0.04
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
--
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
18.00
148
148
0.25
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
13.00
107
107
0.13
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
~
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
6.90
56.56
56.56
0.09
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
7.20
59.02
59.02
0.06
Chrysene
844
826
1.20
46.15
46.15
0.05
12.00
98.36
98.36
0.12
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.23
8.85
8.85
0.01
2.00
16.39
16.39
0.015
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
2.40
92.31
92.31
0.13
21.00
172
172
0.24
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.16
6.15
6.15
0.01
4.50
36.89
36.89
0.069
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
1,115
--
0.72
27.69
27.69
0.02
4.00
32.79
32.79
0.03
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.12
4.62
4.62
0.01
0.33
0.00
0.00
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.34
13.08
13.08
0.01
1.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
1.20
46.15
46.15
0.08
25.00
205
205
0.34
Pyrene
697
9,090
2.30
88.46
88.46
0.13
26.00
213
213
0.31
—
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
0.90
--
--
--
3.88
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH
concentration in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the
contribution up to the maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D
ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section
6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 32 of 42
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-23
RB15-23
Sample Name:
RB15-23-1030
RB15-23-1030FD
Sample Date:
11/5/2015
11/5/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
1-3
1-3
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
11.3
0.113
--
--
9.42
0.0942
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
--
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
12.00
106
106
0.24
13.00
138
138
0.31
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
14.00
124
124
0.28
15.00
159
159
0.36
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
9.30
82.30
82.30
0.17
9.60
102
102
0.21
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
1.80
15.93
15.93
0.04
1.90
20.17
20.17
0.04
Anthracene
594
1,300
15.00
133
133
0.22
16.00
170
170
0.29
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
15.00
133
133
0.16
17.00
180
180
0.21
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
10.00
88.50
88.50
0.09
12.00
127
127
0.13
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
6.80
60.18
60.18
0.06
7.90
83.86
83.86
0.09
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
7.90
69.91
69.91
0.07
8.70
92.36
92.36
0.10
B enzo |g, h,i] pery lene
1,095
648
5.40
47.79
47.79
0.04
5.40
57.32
57.32
0.05
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
7.00
61.95
61.95
0.06
7.40
78.56
78.56
0.08
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
14.00
124
124
0.13
17.00
180
180
0.19
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
43.00
381
381
0.49
48.00
510
510
0.66
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
5.10
45.13
45.13
0.07
5.50
58.39
58.39
0.10
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
18.00
159
159
0.36
18.00
191
191
0.43
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
42.00
372
372
0.55
44.00
467
467
0.70
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
9.60
84.96
84.96
0.08
9.80
104
104
0.10
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
22.00
195
195
--
26.00
276
276
--
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
6.50
57.52
57.52
0.08
7.40
78.56
78.56
0.11
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
42.00
372
372
0.73
45.00
478
478
0.94
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
33.00
292
292
0.39
36.00
382
382
0.51
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
4.50
39.82
39.82
0.04
5.20
55.20
55.20
0.05
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
~
13.00
115
115
0.12
14.00
149
149
0.16
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
7.40
65.49
65.49
0.09
8.50
90.23
90.23
0.12
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
--
36.00
319
319
0.55
36.00
382
382
0.66
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
31.00
274
274
0.33
36.00
382
382
0.46
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
~
1.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
15.00
133
133
0.20
18.00
191
191
0.29
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
19.00
168
168
0.18
21.00
223
223
0.24
Chrysene
844
826
15.00
133
133
0.16
16.00
170
170
0.20
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
2.40
21.24
21.24
0.02
2.30
24.42
24.42
0.02
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
24.00
212
212
0.30
25.00
265
265
0.38
Fluorene
538
26,000
8.10
71.68
71.68
0.13
7.90
83.86
83.86
0.16
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
1,115
--
4.70
41.59
41.59
0.04
4.70
49.89
49.89
0.04
Naphthalene
385
61,700
8.10
71.68
71.68
0.19
8.80
93.42
93.42
0.24
Perylene
967
431
1.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
39.00
345
345
0.58
40.00
425
425
0.71
Pyrene
697
9,090
32.00
283
283
0.41
35.00
372
372
0.53
—
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
6.98
--
--
--
8.98
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH
concentration in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the
contribution up to the maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D
ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section
6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 33 of 42
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-23
RB15-24
Sample Name:
RB15-23-3050
RB15-24-SURF
Sample Date:
11/5/2015
11/4/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
3-5
0-0.5
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
12
0.12
--
--
4.53
0.0453
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
--
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
13.00
108
108
0.24
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
15.00
125
125
0.28
0.05
1.04
1.04
0.002
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
9.70
80.83
80.83
0.165
0.08
1.70
1.70
0.003
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
3.10
25.83
25.83
0.057
0.05
1.02
1.02
0.002
Anthracene
594
1,300
21.00
175
175
0.29
0.19
4.19
4.19
0.01
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
30.00
250
250
0.30
0.65
14.35
14.35
0.02
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
20.00
167
167
0.17
0.64
14.13
14.13
0.01
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
14.00
117
117
0.12
0.58
12.80
12.80
0.01
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
15.00
125
125
0.13
0.51
11.26
11.26
0.01
B enzo |g, h,i] pery lene
1,095
648
10.00
83.33
83.33
0.08
0.41
9.05
9.05
0.01
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
15.00
125
125
0.13
0.59
13.02
13.02
0.01
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
23.00
192
192
0.21
0.33
7.28
7.28
0.01
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
75.00
625
625
0.81
0.95
20.97
20.97
0.03
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
6.50
54.17
54.17
0.09
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
18.00
150
150
0.34
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
62.00
517
517
0.77
0.36
7.95
7.95
0.01
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
15.00
125
125
0.12
0.20
4.42
4.42
0.004
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
37.00
308
308
--
0.48
10.60
10.60
--
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
9.00
75.00
75.00
0.11
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
48.00
400
400
0.78
0.21
4.64
4.64
0.01
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
47.00
392
392
0.53
0.32
7.06
7.06
0.01
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
6.60
55.00
55.00
0.05
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
~
16.00
133
133
0.14
0.26
5.74
5.74
0.01
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
10.00
83.33
83.33
0.11
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
--
39.00
325
325
0.56
0.28
6.18
6.18
0.01
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
39.00
325
325
0.39
0.32
7.06
7.06
0.01
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
~
3.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
20.00
167
167
0.25
0.18
3.97
3.97
0.01
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
22.00
183
183
0.20
0.21
4.64
4.64
0.01
Chrysene
844
826
27.00
225
225
0.27
0.71
15.67
15.67
0.02
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
4.40
36.67
36.67
0.03
0.14
3.09
3.09
0.003
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
41.00
342
342
0.48
1.20
26.49
26.49
0.04
Fluorene
538
26,000
7.70
64.17
64.17
0.12
0.09
1.92
1.92
0.004
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
1,115
--
9.10
75.83
75.83
0.07
0.40
8.83
8.83
0.01
Naphthalene
385
61,700
7.90
65.83
65.83
0.17
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
Perylene
967
431
3.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.19
4.19
4.19
0.004
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
49.00
408
408
0.69
0.58
12.80
12.80
0.02
Pyrene
697
9,090
53.00
442
442
0.63
1.20
26.49
26.49
0.04
—
ESBTU FCVi
—
—
—
9.14
--
--
--
0.33
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH
concentration in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the
contribution up to the maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D
ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section
6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 34 of 42
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-24
RB15-24
Sample Name:
RB15-24-0010
RB15-24-1020
Sample Date:
11/5/2015
11/5/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
0-1
1-2
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
8.85
0.0885
--
--
16.7
0.167
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
--
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
7.40
44.31
44.31
0.10
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.16
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
1.00
11.30
11.30
0.02
13.00
77.84
77.84
0.16
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.36
4.07
4.07
0.01
1.50
8.98
8.98
0.02
Anthracene
594
1,300
1.40
15.82
15.82
0.03
13.00
77.84
77.84
0.13
B enzo [a] anthracene
841
4,153
4.20
47.46
47.46
0.06
15.00
89.82
89.82
0.11
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
3.80
42.94
42.94
0.04
12.00
71.86
71.86
0.07
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
2.50
28.25
28.25
0.03
6.90
41.32
41.32
0.04
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
2.60
29.38
29.38
0.03
8.00
47.90
47.90
0.05
B enzo |g, h,i] pery lene
1,095
648
2.00
22.60
22.60
0.02
6.60
39.52
39.52
0.04
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
2.90
32.77
32.77
0.03
8.60
51.50
51.50
0.05
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
2.10
23.73
23.73
0.03
9.40
56.29
56.29
0.06
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
7.60
85.88
85.88
0.11
39.00
234
234
0.30
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.30
25.75
25.75
0.04
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.60
33.53
33.53
0.08
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
3.60
40.68
40.68
0.06
29.00
174
174
0.26
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
1.20
13.56
13.56
0.01
6.20
37.13
37.13
0.04
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
3.20
36.16
36.16
--
16.00
95.81
95.81
--
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.40
26.35
26.35
0.04
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
2.00
22.60
22.60
0.04
33.00
198
198
0.39
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
2.70
30.51
30.51
0.04
20.00
120
120
0.16
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
~
1.30
14.69
14.69
0.02
7.30
43.71
43.71
0.05
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.70
22.16
22.16
0.03
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
--
2.30
25.99
25.99
0.04
25.00
150
150
0.26
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
2.50
28.25
28.25
0.03
18.00
108
108
0.13
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
~
0.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
1.10
12.43
12.43
0.02
9.40
56.29
56.29
0.09
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
1.50
16.95
16.95
0.02
11.00
65.87
65.87
0.07
Chrysene
844
826
3.90
44.07
44.07
0.05
14.00
83.83
83.83
0.10
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.61
6.89
6.89
0.01
2.10
12.57
12.57
0.01
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
6.60
74.58
74.58
0.11
25.00
150
150
0.21
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.87
9.83
9.83
0.02
8.20
49.10
49.10
0.09
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
1,115
--
1.80
20.34
20.34
0.02
5.70
34.13
34.13
0.03
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.23
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.86
9.72
9.72
0.01
1.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
4.80
54.24
54.24
0.09
35.00
210
210
0.35
Pyrene
697
9,090
8.90
101
101
0.14
39.00
234
234
0.34
—
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
1.15
--
--
--
3.72
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH
concentration in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the
contribution up to the maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D
ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section
6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 35 of 42
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-24
RB15-24
RB15-24
Sample Name:
RB15-24-2040
RB15-24-2040FD
RB15-24-4050
Sample Date:
11/5/2015
11/5/2015
11/5/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
2-4
2-4
4-5
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
12.1
0.121
--
--
12.3
0.123
--
--
9.06
0.0906
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
--
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
40.00
331
331
0.74
37.00
301
301
0.67
28.00
309
309
0.69
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
29.00
240
240
0.54
29.00
236
236
0.53
35.00
386
386
0.86
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
31.00
256
256
0.52
28.00
228
228
0.46
23.00
254
254
0.52
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
2.60
21.49
21.49
0.05
2.30
18.70
18.70
0.04
2.10
23.18
23.18
0.05
Anthracene
594
1,300
33.00
273
273
0.46
30.00
244
244
0.41
31.00
342
342
0.58
Benzo[a]anthracene
841
4,153
26.00
215
215
0.26
24.00
195
195
0.23
26.00
287
287
0.34
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
19.00
157
157
0.16
16.00
130
130
0.13
18.00
199
199
0.21
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
12.00
99.17
99.17
0.10
9.50
77.24
77.24
0.08
10.00
110
110
0.11
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
12.00
99.17
99.17
0.10
11.00
89.43
89.43
0.09
12.00
132
132
0.14
B enzo |g, h,i] pery lene
1,095
648
8.60
71.07
71.07
0.06
7.60
61.79
61.79
0.06
4.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
12.00
99.17
99.17
0.10
11.00
89.43
89.43
0.09
14.00
155
155
0.16
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
20.00
165
165
0.18
18.00
146
146
0.16
17.00
188
188
0.20
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
76.00
628
628
0.82
64.00
520
520
0.68
61.00
673
673
0.87
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
11.00
90.91
90.91
0.15
12.00
97.56
97.56
0.16
5.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
44.00
364
364
0.82
41.00
333
333
0.75
40.00
442
442
0.99
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
66.00
545
545
0.81
65.00
528
528
0.79
55.00
607
607
0.91
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
10.00
82.64
82.64
0.08
8.90
72.36
72.36
0.07
5.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
31.00
256
256
--
28.00
228
228
--
23.00
254
254
--
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
9.80
80.99
80.99
0.12
8.50
69.11
69.11
0.10
5.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
110
909
909
1.78
99.00
805
805
1.58
71.00
784
784
1.54
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
39.00
322
322
0.43
41.00
333
333
0.45
30.00
331
331
0.44
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
7.00
57.85
57.85
0.05
6.10
49.59
49.59
0.04
5.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
~
14.00
116
116
0.12
12.00
97.56
97.56
0.10
5.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
8.00
66.12
66.12
0.09
7.60
61.79
61.79
0.08
5.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
65.00
537
537
0.92
59.00
480
480
0.83
43.00
475
475
0.82
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
35.00
289
289
0.35
29.00
236
236
0.28
21.00
232
232
0.28
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
3.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.90
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
18.00
149
149
0.23
18.00
146
146
0.22
12.00
132
132
0.20
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
22.00
182
182
0.20
18.00
146
146
0.16
5.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
23.00
190
190
0.23
21.00
171
171
0.20
23.00
254
254
0.30
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
2.90
23.97
23.97
0.02
2.60
21.14
21.14
0.02
2.90
32.01
32.01
0.03
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
44.00
364
364
0.51
44.00
358
358
0.51
47.00
519
519
0.73
Fluorene
538
26,000
22.00
182
182
0.34
20.00
163
163
0.30
20.00
221
221
0.41
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
1,115
--
7.50
61.98
61.98
0.06
6.60
53.66
53.66
0.05
7.60
83.89
83.89
0.08
Naphthalene
385
61,700
2.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
20.00
221
221
0.57
Perylene
967
431
3.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.90
0.00
0.00
0.00
5.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
83.00
686
686
1.15
77.00
626
626
1.05
78.00
861
861
1.44
Pyrene
697
9,090
70.00
579
579
0.83
58.00
472
472
0.68
62.00
684
684
0.98
—
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
11.90
--
--
--
10.68
--
--
--
12.90
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH
concentration in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the
contribution up to the maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D
ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section
6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 36 of 42
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-24
RB15-24
RB15-25
Sample Name:
RB15-24-5060
RB15-24-6080
RB15-25-SURF
Sample Date:
11/5/2015
11/5/2015
11/4/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
5-6
6-8
0-0.5
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
1.87
0.0187
--
--
1.63
0.0163
--
--
0.721
0.00721
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
--
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
1.60
85.56
85.56
0.19
0.08
4.91
4.91
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
1.40
74.87
74.87
0.17
0.09
5.34
5.34
0.01
0.00
0.58
0.58
0.001
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
2.10
112
112
0.23
0.09
5.46
5.46
0.01
0.00
0.58
0.58
0.001
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.29
15.51
15.51
0.03
0.01
0.61
0.61
0.001
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
3.10
166
166
0.28
0.10
6.13
6.13
0.01
0.00
0.58
0.58
0.00
Benzo[a]anthracene
841
4,153
4.40
235
235
0.28
0.12
7.36
7.36
0.01
0.00
0.58
0.58
0.00
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
3.50
187
187
0.19
0.09
5.52
5.52
0.01
0.00
0.58
0.58
0.00
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
2.00
107
107
0.11
0.05
3.25
3.25
0.003
0.00
0.58
0.58
0.00
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
2.10
112
112
0.12
0.06
3.80
3.80
0.004
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
B enzo |g, h,i] pery lene
1,095
648
1.60
85.56
85.56
0.08
0.05
3.31
3.31
0.003
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
2.60
139
139
0.14
0.06
3.93
3.93
0.004
0.00
0.58
0.58
0.00
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
2.60
139
139
0.15
0.08
4.66
4.66
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
9.00
481
481
0.63
0.27
16.56
16.56
0.02
0.01
0.97
0.97
0.00
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.89
47.59
47.59
0.08
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
2.00
107
107
0.24
0.11
6.75
6.75
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
5.80
310
310
0.46
0.21
12.88
12.88
0.02
0.00
0.58
0.58
0.00
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.96
51.34
51.34
0.05
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
3.60
193
193
--
0.12
7.36
7.36
--
0.01
0.80
0.80
"
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.85
45.45
45.45
0.07
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
4.60
246
246
0.48
0.22
13.50
13.50
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
3.90
209
209
0.28
0.13
7.98
7.98
0.01
0.01
0.85
0.85
0.00
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
~
1.40
74.87
74.87
0.08
0.06
3.44
3.44
0.004
0.00
0.67
0.67
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
3.30
176
176
0.30
0.15
9.20
9.20
0.02
0.01
0.94
0.94
0.00
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
2.10
112
112
0.14
0.10
6.13
6.13
0.01
0.01
1.37
1.37
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
0.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
1.10
58.82
58.82
0.09
0.06
3.37
3.37
0.01
0.01
0.97
0.97
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.86
45.99
45.99
0.05
0.06
3.56
3.56
0.004
0.01
1.01
1.01
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
4.00
214
214
0.25
0.11
6.75
6.75
0.01
0.00
0.58
0.58
0.00
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.51
27.27
27.27
0.02
0.01
0.86
0.86
0.001
0.00
0.58
0.58
0.001
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
7.70
412
412
0.58
0.18
11.04
11.04
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Fluorene
538
26,000
1.50
80.21
80.21
0.15
0.06
3.80
3.80
0.01
0.00
0.58
0.58
0.001
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
1,115
--
1.40
74.87
74.87
0.07
0.04
2.39
2.39
0.002
0.00
0.58
0.58
0.00
Naphthalene
385
61,700
1.30
69.52
69.52
0.18
0.08
4.60
4.60
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
6.50
348
348
0.58
0.26
15.95
15.95
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Pyrene
697
9,090
8.30
444
444
0.64
0.28
17.18
17.18
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
—
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
6.97
--
--
--
0.28
"
--
--
0.02
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH
concentration in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the
contribution up to the maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D
ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section
6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 37 of 42
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-25
RB15-26
RB15-26
Sample Name:
RB15-25-0010
RB15-26-SURF
RB15-26-0010
Sample Date:
11/5/2015
11/3/2015
11/4/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
0-1
0-0.5
0-1
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
0.629
0.00629
--
--
0.653
0.00653
--
--
1.53
0.0153
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
--
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
4.90
4.90
0.01
0.02
1.05
1.05
0.002
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.01
0.87
0.87
0.002
0.05
7.20
7.20
0.01
0.01
0.52
0.52
0.001
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.00
0.15
0.15
0.00
0.03
3.98
3.98
0.01
0.00
0.11
0.11
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.01
0.83
0.83
0.001
0.11
16.85
16.85
0.03
0.01
0.52
0.52
0.001
Benzo[a]anthracene
841
4,153
0.01
1.07
1.07
0.001
0.23
35.22
35.22
0.04
0.01
0.72
0.72
0.001
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.00
0.67
0.67
0.001
0.20
30.63
30.63
0.03
0.01
0.56
0.56
0.001
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.00
0.76
0.76
0.001
0.12
18.38
18.38
0.02
0.01
0.53
0.53
0.001
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.00
0.67
0.67
0.001
0.13
19.91
19.91
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
B enzo |g, h,i] pery lene
1,095
648
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.08
12.86
12.86
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.01
0.81
0.81
0.001
0.12
18.38
18.38
0.02
0.01
0.38
0.38
0.00
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.01
0.89
0.89
0.001
0.17
26.03
26.03
0.03
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
0.02
2.54
2.54
0.003
0.53
81.16
81.16
0.11
0.03
1.83
1.83
0.002
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
7.66
7.66
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.00
0.67
0.67
0.002
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
1.11
1.11
0.003
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.01
2.07
2.07
0.003
0.24
36.75
36.75
0.05
0.02
1.11
1.11
0.002
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.07
10.41
10.41
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.01
1.59
1.59
"
0.22
33.69
33.69
--
0.02
1.50
1.50
"
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
0.02
2.54
2.54
0.005
0.12
18.38
18.38
0.04
0.02
1.37
1.37
0.003
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
0.01
1.91
1.91
0.003
0.17
26.03
26.03
0.03
0.02
1.31
1.31
0.002
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
~
0.01
1.22
1.22
0.001
0.07
9.95
9.95
0.01
0.02
1.18
1.18
0.001
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
0.02
2.70
2.70
0.005
0.13
19.91
19.91
0.03
0.02
1.44
1.44
0.002
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.02
2.38
2.38
0.003
0.11
16.85
16.85
0.02
0.03
1.83
1.83
0.002
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.01
1.75
1.75
0.003
0.05
7.50
7.50
0.01
0.02
1.31
1.31
0.002
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.01
1.59
1.59
0.002
0.05
7.66
7.66
0.01
0.02
1.37
1.37
0.002
Chrysene
844
826
0.01
1.38
1.38
0.002
0.20
30.63
30.63
0.04
0.01
0.92
0.92
0.001
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.00
0.15
0.15
0.00
0.03
4.90
4.90
0.004
0.00
0.13
0.13
0.00
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.02
2.54
2.54
0.004
0.34
52.07
52.07
0.07
0.02
1.31
1.31
0.002
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.00
0.65
0.65
0.001
0.04
5.67
5.67
0.01
0.01
0.53
0.53
0.001
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
1,115
--
0.00
0.40
0.40
0.00
0.08
12.86
12.86
0.01
0.00
0.29
0.29
0.00
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
7.96
7.96
0.02
0.13
8.50
8.50
0.02
Perylene
967
431
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
6.74
6.74
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.02
2.86
2.86
0.005
0.20
30.63
30.63
0.05
0.03
1.83
1.83
0.003
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.02
2.70
2.70
0.004
0.50
76.57
76.57
0.11
0.02
1.57
1.57
0.002
—
ESBTU FCVi
"
--
--
0.05
--
--
--
0.89
--
--
--
0.06
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH
concentration in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the
contribution up to the maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D
ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section
6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 38 of 42
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
RB15-26
RB15-26
RB15-26
RB15-26-1030
RB15-26-1030FD
RB15-26-3050
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
1-3
1-3
3-5
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
1.55
0.0155
--
--
1.93
0.0193
--
--
1.16
0.0116
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
--
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.004
0.26
0.26
0.001
0.00
0.21
0.21
0.0005
0.003
0.25
0.25
0.00
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
0.004
0.26
0.26
0.001
0.00
0.21
0.21
0.0004
0.002
0.15
0.15
0.00
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.004
0.26
0.26
0.001
0.00
0.21
0.21
0.0005
0.0003
0.03
0.03
0.00
Anthracene
594
1,300
0.004
0.26
0.26
0.00
0.00
0.21
0.21
0.0003
0.001
0.12
0.12
0.00
Benzo[a]anthracene
841
4,153
0.004
0.26
0.26
0.00
0.01
0.29
0.29
0.0003
0.004
0.34
0.34
0.00
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
0.004
0.26
0.26
0.00
0.00
0.21
0.21
0.0002
0.001
0.12
0.12
0.00
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
0.004
0.27
0.27
0.00
0.01
0.27
0.27
0.0003
0.002
0.13
0.13
0.00
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
0.005
0.30
0.30
0.00
0.01
0.31
0.31
0.0003
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
B enzo |g, h,i] pery lene
1,095
648
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.002
0.21
0.21
0.00
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
0.004
0.26
0.26
0.00
0.00
0.21
0.21
0.0002
0.001
0.08
0.08
0.00
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
0.01
0.59
0.59
0.001
0.01
0.62
0.62
0.001
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
0.02
1.03
1.03
0.001
0.02
1.09
1.09
0.001
0.01
0.59
0.59
0.00
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.24
0.001
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
0.01
0.52
0.52
0.001
0.01
0.57
0.57
0.001
0.004
0.34
0.34
0.00
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.01
0.71
0.71
0.001
0.01
0.47
0.47
0.0005
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
0.02
1.16
1.16
"
0.02
1.14
1.14
"
0.01
0.56
0.56
"
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
0.01
0.43
0.43
0.001
0.01
0.62
0.62
0.001
0.01
0.47
0.47
0.00
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
~
0.01
0.90
0.90
0.001
0.02
0.88
0.88
0.001
0.01
0.47
0.47
0.00
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
0.01
0.46
0.46
0.00
0.01
0.52
0.52
0.0005
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
~
0.02
1.10
1.10
0.001
0.02
0.98
0.98
0.001
0.01
0.55
0.55
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.005
0.32
0.32
0.00
0.01
0.28
0.28
0.0004
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
0.01
0.84
0.84
0.001
0.02
0.98
0.98
0.002
0.01
0.50
0.50
0.00
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
0.03
1.61
1.61
0.002
0.03
1.50
1.50
0.002
0.01
0.76
0.76
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
0.005
0.30
0.30
0.00
0.00
0.25
0.25
0.0002
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.02
1.23
1.23
0.002
0.02
1.14
1.14
0.002
0.01
0.52
0.52
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.02
1.42
1.42
0.002
0.03
1.30
1.30
0.001
0.01
0.67
0.67
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
0.01
0.50
0.50
0.001
0.01
0.52
0.52
0.001
0.003
0.28
0.28
0.00
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.004
0.26
0.26
0.00
0.00
0.21
0.21
0.0002
0.0003
0.03
0.03
0.00
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.44
0.44
0.001
0.004
0.34
0.34
0.00
Fluorene
538
26,000
0.004
0.26
0.26
0.00
0.00
0.21
0.21
0.0004
0.001
0.09
0.09
0.00
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
1,115
--
0.004
0.26
0.26
0.00
0.00
0.21
0.21
0.0002
0.004
0.34
0.34
0.00
Naphthalene
385
61,700
0.003
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.47
0.47
0.00
Perylene
967
431
0.01
0.48
0.48
0.00
0.01
0.42
0.42
0.0004
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
0.002
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.62
0.62
0.001
0.004
0.37
0.37
0.00
Pyrene
697
9,090
0.003
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.62
0.62
0.001
0.004
0.38
0.38
0.00
—
ESBTU FCVi
7.10
57.72
57.72
0.13
"
--
--
0.02
--
--
--
0.01
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH
concentration in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the
contribution up to the maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D
ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section
6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 39 of 42
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-27
RB15-27
RB15-27
Sample Name:
RB15-27-SURF
RB15-27-0010
RB15-27-1030
Sample Date:
10/26/2015
10/28/2015
10/28/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
1.95
0.0195
--
--
18.1
0.181
--
--
12.1
0.121
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
--
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
21.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
19.00
157
157
0.35
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
21.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.43
2.38
2.38
0.01
27.00
223
223
0.50
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
66.00
3385
3385
6.89
7.70
42.54
42.54
0.09
30.00
248
248
0.50
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
11.00
564
564
1.25
0.91
5.03
5.03
0.01
1.800
14.88
14.88
0.03
Anthracene
594
1,300
120
6154
1300
2.19
7.70
42.54
42.54
0.07
23.00
190
190
0.32
Benzo[a]anthracene
841
4,153
130
6667
4153
4.94
13.00
71.82
71.82
0.09
23.00
190
190
0.23
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
100
5128
3840
3.98
11.00
60.77
60.77
0.06
18.00
149
149
0.15
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
85.00
4359
2169
2.22
9.80
54.14
54.14
0.06
13.00
107
107
0.11
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
63.00
3231
3231
3.34
6.80
37.57
37.57
0.04
11.00
90.91
90.91
0.09
B enzo |g, h,i] pery lene
1,095
648
41.00
2103
648
0.59
4.80
26.52
26.52
0.02
7.30
60.33
60.33
0.06
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
96.00
4923
1220
1.24
7.80
43.09
43.09
0.04
12.00
99.17
99.17
0.10
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
21.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.10
22.65
22.65
0.02
14.00
116
116
0.12
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
180
9231
9231
11.99
20.00
110
110
0.14
52.00
430
430
0.56
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
21.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
7.00
57.85
57.85
0.09
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
21.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
33.00
273
273
0.61
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
76.00
3897
3897
5.82
8.40
46.41
46.41
0.07
48.00
397
397
0.59
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
21.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
8.10
66.94
66.94
0.07
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
45.00
2308
2308
--
6.30
34.81
34.81
--
22.00
182
182
--
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
21.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
21.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.70
20.44
20.44
0.04
65.00
537
537
1.05
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
--
21.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4.40
24.31
24.31
0.03
29.00
240
240
0.32
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
21.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
~
21.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
7.90
65.29
65.29
0.07
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
21.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
--
21.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.40
18.78
18.78
0.03
36.00
298
298
0.51
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
21.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.90
16.02
16.02
0.02
20.00
165
165
0.20
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
~
21.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
21.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
12.00
99.17
99.17
0.15
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
21.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.00
74.38
74.38
0.08
Chrysene
844
826
120
6154
826
0.98
11.00
60.77
60.77
0.07
20.00
165
165
0.20
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
13.00
667
667
0.59
1.80
9.94
9.94
0.01
2.100
17.36
17.36
0.02
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
330
16923
16923
23.94
27.00
149
149
0.21
48.00
397
397
0.56
Fluorene
538
26,000
72.00
3692
3692
6.86
5.10
28.18
28.18
0.05
22.00
182
182
0.34
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
1,115
--
42.00
2154
2154
1.93
4.70
25.97
25.97
0.02
6.60
54.55
54.55
0.05
Naphthalene
385
61,700
21.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.90
10.50
10.50
0.03
55.00
455
455
1.18
Perylene
967
431
21.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.80
15.47
15.47
0.02
3.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
370
18974
18974
31.84
21.00
116
116
0.19
83.00
686
686
1.15
Pyrene
697
9,090
200
10256
9090
13.04
19.00
105
105
0.15
41.00
339
339
0.49
—
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
123.63
--
--
--
1.60
--
--
--
10.01
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH
concentration in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the
contribution up to the maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D
ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section
6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 40 of 42
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
RB15-27
RB15-27
RB15-27
RB15-27-3050
RB15-27-5065
RB15-27-6570
10/28/2015
10/28/2015
10/28/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
3-5
5-6.5
6.5-7
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
12.2
0.122
--
--
4.27
0.0427
--
--
1.1
0.011
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
--
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
34.00
279
279
0.62
89.00
2084
2084
4.67
1.20
109
109
0.24
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
51.00
418
418
0.94
150
3513
3513
7.86
1.80
164
164
0.37
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
56.00
459
459
0.93
42.00
984
984
2.00
0.520
47.27
47.27
0.10
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
2.90
23.77
23.77
0.05
78.00
1827
1827
4.04
1.200
109
109
0.24
Anthracene
594
1,300
57.00
467
467
0.79
140
3279
1300
2.19
1.30
118
118
0.20
Benzo[a]anthracene
841
4,153
43.00
352
352
0.42
91.00
2131
2131
2.53
0.60
54.55
54.55
0.06
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
34.00
279
279
0.29
59.00
1382
1382
1.43
0.37
33.64
33.64
0.03
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
19.00
156
156
0.16
38.00
890
890
0.91
0.30
27.27
27.27
0.03
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
10.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
25.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.32
0.00
0.00
0.00
B enzo |g, h,i] pery lene
1,095
648
13.00
107
107
0.10
22.00
515
515
0.47
0.18
16.36
16.36
0.01
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
23.00
189
189
0.19
51.00
1194
1194
1.22
0.32
29.09
29.09
0.03
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
10.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
25.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.32
0.00
0.00
0.00
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
97.00
795
795
1.03
200
4684
4684
6.08
1.40
127
127
0.17
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
10.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
25.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.32
0.00
0.00
0.00
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
60.00
492
492
1.11
170
3981
3981
8.97
2.10
191
191
0.43
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
77.00
631
631
0.94
140
3279
3279
4.89
1.20
109
109
0.16
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
10.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
25.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.32
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
30.00
246
246
--
72.00
1686
1686
--
0.66
60.00
60.00
--
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
10.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
25.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.32
0.00
0.00
0.00
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
97.00
795
795
1.56
200
4684
4684
9.18
3.20
291
291
0.57
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
~
28.00
230
230
0.31
61.00
1429
1429
1.91
0.32
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
--
10.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
25.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.32
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
~
10.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
25.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.32
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
10.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
25.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.32
0.00
0.00
0.00
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
~
40.00
328
328
0.56
99.00
2319
2319
3.99
1.70
155
155
0.27
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
10.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
25.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.32
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
--
10.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
25.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.32
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
10.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
25.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.32
0.00
0.00
0.00
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
10.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
25.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.32
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chrysene
844
826
37.00
303
303
0.36
80.00
1874
826
0.98
0.55
50.00
50.00
0.06
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
3.80
31.15
31.15
0.03
7.80
183
183
0.16
0.054
4.91
4.91
0.004
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
95.00
779
779
1.10
190
4450
4450
6.29
1.20
109
109
0.15
Fluorene
538
26,000
44.00
361
361
0.67
120
2810
2810
5.22
1.300
118
118
0.22
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
1,115
--
12.00
98.36
98.36
0.09
22.00
515
515
0.46
0.15
13.64
13.64
0.01
Naphthalene
385
61,700
92.00
754
754
1.96
380
8899
8899
23.12
6.900
627
627
1.63
Perylene
967
431
10.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
25.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.32
0.00
0.00
0.00
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
190
1557
1557
2.61
350
8197
8197
13.75
3.20
291
291
0.49
Pyrene
697
9,090
95.00
779
779
1.12
140
3279
3279
4.70
0.88
80.00
80.00
0.11
—
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
16.38
--
--
--
104.52
--
--
--
4.99
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH
concentration in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the
contribution up to the maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D
ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section
6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 41 of 42
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-1 ESBTUs FOR PAHS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
RB15-28
RB15-28
RB15-28
RB15-28-SURF
RB15-28-0010
RB15-28-1030
10/26/2015
10/28/2015
10/28/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
0-0.5
0-1
1-3
Coc, PAHi, FCVia
Coc, PAHi, Maxi3
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Cone
Coc
Final
Jlg/g oc
Jlg/gOC
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/gOC
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Hg/g dry
wt.
Jlg/g oc
Cocb
ESBTU
FCVi
Total Organic Carbon (%)
~
--
3.16
0.0316
--
--
4.8
0.048
--
--
2.27
0.0227
--
--
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) (jig/kg)
--
1 -Methylnaphthalene
446
165,700
1.90
60.13
60.13
0.13
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.10
4.27
4.27
0.01
2 -Methylnaphthalene
447
154,800
0.39
12.34
12.34
0.03
0.32
6.67
6.67
0.01
0.027
1.19
1.19
0.003
Acenaphthene
491
33,400
4.80
152
152
0.31
1.40
29.17
29.17
0.06
0.064
2.82
2.82
0.01
Acenaphthylene
452
24,000
0.46
14.56
14.56
0.03
1.10
22.92
22.92
0.05
0.067
2.95
2.95
0.01
Anthracene
594
1,300
2.30
72.78
72.78
0.12
4.30
89.58
89.58
0.15
0.150
6.61
6.61
0.01
Benzo[a]anthracene
841
4,153
4.40
139
139
0.17
4.10
85.42
85.42
0.10
0.14
6.17
6.17
0.01
Benzo[a]pyrene
965
3,840
4.00
127
127
0.13
3.30
68.75
68.75
0.07
0.110
4.85
4.85
0.01
Benzo[b]fluoranthene
979
2,169
3.70
117
117
0.12
2.60
54.17
54.17
0.06
0.09
3.96
3.96
0.004
Benzo[e]pyrene
967
4,300
2.70
85.44
85.44
0.09
2.10
43.75
43.75
0.05
0.08
3.39
3.39
0.004
B enzo |g, h,i] pery lene
1,095
648
2.00
63.29
63.29
0.06
1.50
31.25
31.25
0.03
0.06
2.82
2.82
0.003
B enzo [k] fluoranthene
981
1,220
2.90
91.77
91.77
0.09
2.60
54.17
54.17
0.06
0.068
3.00
3.00
0.003
Cl-Chrysenes
929
--
1.80
56.96
56.96
0.06
1.50
31.25
31.25
0.03
0.09
3.74
3.74
0.004
C1 -Fluoranthenes/pyrene
770
--
6.90
218
218
0.28
7.10
148
148
0.19
0.34
14.98
14.98
0.02
Cl-Fluorenes
611
--
0.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
2.69
2.69
0.004
CI-Naphthalenes
444
--
1.60
50.63
50.63
0.11
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.09
3.74
3.74
0.01
C1 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
670
--
3.20
101
101
0.15
4.40
91.67
91.67
0.14
0.31
13.66
13.66
0.02
C2-Chrysenes
1,008
--
0.88
27.85
27.85
0.03
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
2.82
2.82
0.003
C2-Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
--
--
2.50
79.11
79.11
--
2.70
56.25
56.25
--
0.18
7.93
7.93
--
C2-Fluorenes
686
--
0.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
2.47
2.47
0.004
C2-Naphthalenes
510
--
3.30
104
104
0.20
5.30
110
110
0.22
0.42
18.50
18.50
0.04
C2-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
746
~
1.70
53.80
53.80
0.07
2.10
43.75
43.75
0.06
0.21
9.25
9.25
0.01
C3-Chrysenes
1,112
~
0.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.06
2.47
2.47
0.002
C3 -Fluoranthenes/Pyrene
949
~
0.82
25.95
25.95
0.03
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.10
4.23
4.23
0.004
C3-Fluorenes
769
~
0.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
1.89
1.89
0.002
C3 -Naphthalenes
581
--
2.00
63.29
63.29
0.11
3.70
77.08
77.08
0.13
0.51
22.47
22.47
0.04
C3 -Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
829
~
1.10
34.81
34.81
0.04
1.40
29.17
29.17
0.04
0.19
8.37
8.37
0.01
C4-Chrysenes
1,214
~
0.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.000
C4-Naphthalenes
657
~
0.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.32
14.10
14.10
0.02
C4-Phenanthrenes/Anthracenes
913
~
0.39
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.12
5.29
5.29
0.01
Chrysene
844
826
4.00
127
127
0.15
3.80
79.17
79.17
0.09
0.13
5.73
5.73
0.01
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
1,123
2,389
0.66
20.89
20.89
0.02
0.44
9.17
9.17
0.01
0.020
0.88
0.88
0.001
Fluoranthene
707
23,870
6.70
212
212
0.30
9.00
188
188
0.27
0.29
12.78
12.78
0.02
Fluorene
538
26,000
1.10
34.81
34.81
0.06
2.50
52.08
52.08
0.10
0.140
6.17
6.17
0.01
Indeno( 1,2,3 -cd)pyrene
1,115
--
1.80
56.96
56.96
0.05
1.50
31.25
31.25
0.03
0.047
2.07
2.07
0.002
Naphthalene
385
61,700
2.10
66.46
66.46
0.17
1.60
33.33
33.33
0.09
0.084
3.70
3.70
0.01
Perylene
967
431
1.00
31.65
31.65
0.03
0.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.000
Phenanthrene
596
34,300
9.70
307
307
0.52
12.00
250
250
0.42
0.53
23.35
23.35
0.04
Pyrene
697
9,090
5.50
174
174
0.25
6.50
135
135
0.19
0.26
11.45
11.45
0.02
—
ESBTU FCVi
--
--
--
3.77
--
--
--
2.62
--
--
--
0.34
Notes:
aPAHs and corresponding Coc PAHi, FCVi and Coc PAHi, Maxi values are from Table 3-4 in EPA, 2003).
b COC,PAHi,Maxi is the maximum solubility limited PAH
concentration in sediment on an organic carbon basis; only the
contribution up to the maximum COC,PAHi,Maxi is counted in the D
ESBTUFCV for the PAH mixture (EPA, 2003, Section 4.3 and Section
6.3).
ESBTU= equilibrium sediment benchmark toxic unit.
FCV= final chronic value.
Koc = organic carbon-water partition coefficient.
Hg/kg - micrograms per kilogram.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 42 of 42
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-2 ESBTUS FOR SEM/AVS METALS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-01
RB15-02
RB15-02
RB15-03
RB15-04
RB15-05
RB15-06
Sample Name:
RB15-01-SURF
RB15-02-SURF
RB15-02-SURFFD
RB15-03-SURF
RB15-04-SURF
RB15-05-SURF
RB15-06-SURF
Sample Date:
10/30/2015
10/31/2015
10/31/2015
10/31/2015
10/31/2015
10/31/2015
10/31/2015
Depth Interval (feet):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
SEM/AVS Ratio
none
0.31
1.30
2.20
0.20
~
0.99
~
I SEM
(imole/g dry
2.5783
3.4868
3.7803
1.7298
12.2932
1.8148
2.0232
AVS
(imole/g dry
8.3
2.7
1.8
9.1
0.72 U
1.9
0.69 U
foe
fraction
0.0392
0.0134
0.0089
0.0376
0.0169
0.0170
0.0174
(I SEM - AVS) / foe
(imole/g dry
-146
59
222
-196
685
-5
77
NOTES:
AVS = Acid Volatile Sulfides
Bolded values exceed 1 SEM/AVS ratio
lioldcd and shaded \ allies c\u.vd 13" mimic
foe = fraction organic carbon
FD = Field Duplicate
SEM = Simultaneously Extracted Metals
jimole/g dry = micromole per gram dry weight basis
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 5
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-2 ESBTUS FOR SEM/AVS METALS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-07
RB15-08
RB15-08
RB15-09
RB15-09
RB15-10
Sample Name:
RB15-07-SURF
RB15-08-SURF
RB15-08-SURFFD
RB15-09-SURF
RB15-09-SURFFD
RB15-10-SURF
Sample Date:
11/1/2015
11/1/2015
11/1/2015
11/1/2015
11/1/2015
11/1/2015
Depth Interval (feet):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
SEM/AVS Ratio
none
--
--
--
0.50
~
--
I SEM
(imole/g dry
0.5810
1.3180
1.4690
2.4944
2.4871
0.9050
AVS
(imole/g dry
0.78 U
0.68 U
0.66 U
5
0.84 U
0.65 U
foe
fraction
0.0153
0.0085
0.0127
0.0239
0.0310
0.0486
(I SEM - AVS) / foe
(imole/g dry
-13
75
64
-105
53
5
NOTES:
AVS = Acid Volatile Sulfides
Bolded values exceed 1 SEM/AVS ratio
lioldcd and shaded \ allies c\u.vd 13" mimic
foe = fraction organic carbon
FD = Field Duplicate
SEM = Simultaneously Extracted Metals
jimole/g dry = micromole per gram dry weight basis
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 2 of 5
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-2 ESBTUS FOR SEM/AVS METALS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-11
RB15-13
RB15-14
RB15-15
RB15-16
RB15-17
RB15-18
Sample Name:
RB15-11-SURF
RB15-13-SURF
RB15-14-SURF
RB15-15-SURF
RB15-16-SURF
RB15-17-SURF
RB15-18-SURF
Sample Date:
11/3/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/2/2015
11/1/2015
Depth Interval (feet):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
SEM/AVS Ratio
none
--
0.97
0.50
0.47
--
~
~
I SEM
(imole/g dry
2.6001
5.0054
4.4139
2.6780
2.8681
0.5570
1.1580
AVS
(imole/g dry
0.97 U
5.2
8.8
5.7
0.83 U
0.67 U
0.59 U
foe
fraction
0.0471
0.0442
0.0194
0.0419
0.0456
0.0141
0.0124
(I SEM - AVS) / foe
(imole/g dry
35
-4
-226
-72
45
-8
46
NOTES:
AVS = Acid Volatile Sulfides
Bolded values exceed 1 SEM/AVS ratio
lioldcd and shaded \ allies c\u.vd 13" mimic
foe = fraction organic carbon
FD = Field Duplicate
SEM = Simultaneously Extracted Metals
jimole/g dry = micromole per gram dry weight basis
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 3 of 5
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-2 ESBTUS FOR SEM/AVS METALS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-19
RB15-20
RB15-21
RB15-22
RB15-23
RB15-24
RB15-25
Sample Name:
RB15-19-SURF
RB15-20-SURF
RB15-21-SURF
RB15-22-SURF
RB15-23-SURF
RB15-24-SURF
RB15-25-SURF
Sample Date:
11/2/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/3/2015
11/3/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
Depth Interval (feet):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
SEM/AVS Ratio
none
--
0.97
0.78
0.44
0.13
0.50
~
I SEM
(imole/g dry
7.4972
8.2940
2.8640
3.1945
1.8180
2.5588
0.3230
AVS
(imole/g dry
0.71 U
8.6
3.6
7.4
14
5.1
0.63 U
foe
fraction
0.0127
0.0518
0.0110
0.0400
0.0260
0.0453
0.0072
(I SEM - AVS) / foe
(imole/g dry
534
-6
-67
-105
-469
-56
-43
NOTES:
AVS = Acid Volatile Sulfides
Bolded values exceed 1 SEM/AVS ratio
lioldcd and shaded \ allies c\u.vd 13" mimic
foe = fraction organic carbon
FD = Field Duplicate
SEM = Simultaneously Extracted Metals
jimole/g dry = micromole per gram dry weight basis
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 4 of 5
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 4-2 ESBTUS FOR SEM/AVS METALS
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-26
RB15-27
RB15-28
Sample Name:
RB15-26-SURF
RB15-27-SURF
RB15-28-SURF
Sample Date:
11/3/2015
10/26/2015
10/26/2015
Depth Interval (feet):
0-0.5
0-0.5
0-0.5
Analyte
Unit
SEM/AVS Ratio
none
0.44
0.93
0.07
I SEM
(imole/g dry
0.2600
1.3996
1.6350
AVS
(imole/g dry
0.57
1.5
23
foe
fraction
0.0065
0.0195
0.0316
(I SEM - AVS) / foe
(imole/g dry
-47
-5
-676
NOTES:
AVS = Acid Volatile Sulfides
Bolded values exceed 1 SEM/AVS ratio
lioldcd and shaded \ allies c\ixvd 13" uniok- g,.
foe = fraction organic carbon
FD = Field Duplicate
SEM = Simultaneously Extracted Metals
jumole/g dry = micromole per gram dry weight basis
U = Indicates the analyte was analyzed but not detected
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 5 of 5
Site Characterization Report
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
Tables for
Section 5: Probable Effects Concentration Quotients
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 5-1 PEC-Qs
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID
Field Sample ID
mean PEC-Q
metals
PEC-Q Total
17PAHs
PEC-Q Total
PCBs
mean PEC-Q
RB15-01
RB15-01-0010
0.63
1.29
1.49
1.14
RB15-01
RB15-01-1030
1.29
1.24
5.18
2.57
RB15-01
RB15-01-3050
1.43
1.78
14.70
5.97
RB15-01
RB15-01-SURF
0.50
0.62
0.31
0.48
RB15-02
RB15-02-0010
1.33
32.61
3.79
12.58
RB15-02
RB15-02-1030
1.81
26.30
0.09
9.40
RB15-02
RB15-02-3040
0.19
0.29
0.00
0.16
RB15-02
RB15-02-SURF
0.57
2.19
1.00
1.25
RB15-02
RB15-02-SURFFD
0.46
1.67
0.81
0.98
RB15-03
RB15-03-0010
1.86
1.58
0.58
1.34
RB15-03
RB15-03-1030
3.94
3.51
0.25
2.56
RB15-03
RB15-03-3050
2.73
11.51
0.00
4.75
RB15-03
RB15-03-5070
0.22
0.27
0.00
0.16
RB15-03
RB15-03-SURF
0.29
0.44
0.20
0.31
RB15-04
RB15-04-0010
3.36
14.26
1.09
6.24
RB15-04
RB15-04-1030
0.61
3.01
0.00
1.20
RB15-04
RB15-04-1030FD
0.29
3.71
0.00
1.33
RB15-04
RB15-04-3040
0.18
0.01
0.00
0.06
RB15-04
RB15-04-SURF
2.35
5.81
0.14
2.77
RB15-05
RB15-05-0010
0.27
6.64
0.31
2.41
RB15-05
RB15-05-1030
0.18
0.01
0.02
0.07
RB15-05
RB15-05-SURF
0.22
0.60
0.09
0.30
RB15-06
RB15-06-0010
0.27
0.07
0.10
0.14
RB15-06
RB15-06-1030
0.25
0.00
0.00
0.08
RB15-06
RB15-06-SURF
0.65
1.12
0.48
0.75
RB15-07
RB15-07-0010
0.45
0.46
0.36
0.42
RB15-07
RB15-07-1020
0.28
0.71
1.27
0.76
RB15-07
RB 15-07-2030
0.18
0.05
0.05
0.09
RB15-07
RB15-07-SURF
0.17
1.65
0.10
0.64
RB15-08
RB15-08-0010
0.21
0.57
0.38
0.39
RB15-08
RB15-08-SURF
0.30
0.60
0.79
0.56
RB15-08
RB15-08-SURFFD
0.31
0.26
0.60
0.39
RB15-09
RB15-09-0010
0.23
4.05
0.95
1.74
RB15-09
RB15-09-SURF
0.37
1.17
1.27
0.93
RB15-09
RB15-09-SURFFD
0.47
0.94
2.31
1.24
RB15-10
RB15-10-0010
0.17
0.39
0.14
0.24
RB15-10
RB15-10-SURF
0.19
0.44
0.66
0.43
RB15-11
RB15-11-0010
0.33
3.97
0.08
1.46
RB15-11
RB15-11-1030
0.26
0.08
0.00
0.11
RB15-11
RB15-11-1030FD
0.28
0.03
0.00
0.10
RB15-11
RB15-11-SURF
0.49
38.34
0.31
13.05
RB15-12
RB15-12-0010
0.51
278.57
0.65
93.25
Riverbend AreaCharacterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan Page 1 of 3
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 5-1 PEC-Qs
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID
Field Sample ID
mean PEC-Q
metals
PEC-Q Total
17PAHs
PEC-Q Total
PCBs
mean PEC-Q
RB15-12
RB15-12-1030
1.25
7992.54
1.67
2665.16
RB15-13
RB15-13-0010
0.93
5.14
3.93
3.33
RB15-13
RB15-13-1025
1.32
12.56
6.02
6.63
RB15-13
RB15-13-2535
1.02
54.54
1.36
18.97
RB15-13
RB15-13-3550
0.26
1.15
0.00
0.47
RB15-13
RB15-13-SURF
0.32
11.53
1.58
4.48
RB15-14
RB15-14-0010
1.16
24.32
0.77
8.75
RB15-14
RB15-14-1030
1.07
57.92
0.10
19.70
RB15-14
RB15-14-3050
0.19
0.64
0.00
0.28
RB15-14
RB15-14-SURF
0.50
2.77
1.43
1.57
RB15-15
RB15-15-0010
1.05
50.27
0.69
17.34
RB15-15
RB15-15-1020
0.20
3.86
0.05
1.37
RB15-15
RB15-15-2040
0.67
42.81
0.07
14.52
RB15-15
RB15-15-2040FD
0.47
29.71
0.08
10.08
RB15-15
RB15-15-4060
0.21
0.50
0.00
0.24
RB15-15
RB15-15-SURF
0.35
1.04
0.53
0.64
RB15-16
RB15-16-0010
0.53
11.11
0.47
4.04
RB15-16
RB15-16-1030
1.00
138.62
0.17
46.60
RB15-16
RB15-16-3040
0.72
134.56
0.14
45.14
RB15-16
RB15-16-4060
0.25
1.46
0.00
0.57
RB15-16
RB15-16-SURF
0.36
1.49
0.35
0.73
RB15-17
RB15-17-0010
0.19
0.88
0.03
0.37
RB15-17
RB15-17-1030
0.20
0.01
0.00
0.07
RB15-17
RB15-17-SURF
0.20
0.05
0.03
0.09
RB15-18
RB15-18-0010
0.30
2.14
0.51
0.98
RB15-18
RB15-18-SURF
3.77
0.91
0.04
1.57
RB15-19
RB15-19-0010
0.62
4.32
1.98
2.31
RB15-19
RB15-19-1030
0.20
0.01
0.03
0.08
RB15-19
RB15-19-SURF
2.03
1.34
1.30
1.56
RB15-20
RB15-20-0010
4.27
2.52
0.87
2.55
RB15-20
RB15-20-1020
10.52
3.82
0.78
5.04
RB15-20
RB 15-20-2040
0.71
0.32
0.02
0.35
RB15-20
RB15-20-SURF
1.13
1.26
0.78
1.06
RB15-21
RB15-21-0010
0.77
0.81
0.48
0.69
RB15-21
RB15-21-1020
2.26
2.05
0.13
1.48
RB15-21
RB15-21-SURF
0.28
0.49
0.60
0.46
RB15-22
RB15-22-0010
0.97
1.54
1.55
1.35
RB15-22
RB15-22-1020
1.38
2.56
0.40
1.44
RB 15-22
RB 15-22-2030
3.50
5.05
0.12
2.89
RB 15-22
RB15-22-3050
2.66
12.64
0.14
5.14
RB 15-22
RB15-22-SURF
0.40
0.67
0.81
0.63
RB15-23
RB15-23-0010
2.06
6.67
0.62
3.12
Riverbend AreaCharacterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan Page 2 of 3
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 5-1 PEC-Qs
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID
Field Sample ID
mean PEC-Q
metals
PEC-Q Total
17PAHs
PEC-Q Total
PCBs
mean PEC-Q
RB15-23
RB15-23-1030
4.30
9.54
0.27
4.70
RB15-23
RB15-23-1030FD
4.18
10.17
0.20
4.85
RB15-23
RB15-23-3050
4.44
14.78
0.23
6.48
RB15-23
RB15-23-SURF
0.24
0.62
0.55
0.47
RB15-24
RB15-24-0010
1.41
2.02
1.20
1.54
RB15-24
RB15-24-1020
2.03
9.10
0.51
3.88
RB15-24
RB15-24-2040
2.95
18.80
0.16
7.30
RB15-24
RB15-24-2040FD
2.94
17.08
0.20
6.74
RB15-24
RB15-24-4050
2.39
18.59
0.08
7.02
RB15-24
RB15-24-5060
0.35
2.29
0.00
0.88
RB15-24
RB15-24-6080
0.10
0.07
0.00
0.06
RB15-24
RB15-24-SURF
0.34
0.33
0.49
0.39
RB15-25
RB15-25-0010
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.03
RB15-25
RB15-25-SURF
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.02
RB15-26
RB15-26-0010
0.13
0.01
0.00
0.05
RB15-26
RB15-26-1030
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.04
RB15-26
RB15-26-1030FD
0.12
0.00
0.00
0.04
RB15-26
RB15-26-3050
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.03
RB15-26
RB15-26-SURF
0.12
0.11
0.04
0.09
RB15-27
RB15-27-0010
0.35
6.78
0.31
2.48
RB15-27
RB15-27-1030
2.39
18.98
0.11
7.16
RB15-27
RB15-27-3050
1.38
38.06
0.00
13.14
RB15-27
RB15-27-5065
0.99
86.00
0.00
29.00
RB15-27
RB15-27-6570
0.07
0.91
0.00
0.33
RB15-27
RB15-27-SURF
0.19
82.46
0.30
27.65
RB15-28
RB15-28-0010
0.31
2.57
0.26
1.05
RB15-28
RB15-28-1030
0.20
0.10
0.01
0.11
RB15-28
RB15-28-SURF
2.05
2.48
0.58
1.70
mean PEC-Q = mean PEC-Q metals + PEC-Q Total 17PAHs + PEC-Q Total PCBs/3
Riverbend AreaCharacterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan Page 3 of 3
Site Characterization Report
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
Tables for
Section 7: Michigan Department of Environmental Quality
Samples collected from locations near Riverside Park
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 7-1A SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR VOLATILES
EAProjectNo.: 62561.25
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (ft):
RB15-12
RB15-13
RB15-13
RB15-13
RB15-13
RB15-14
RB15-14
RB15-14
RB15-15
RB15-15
RB15-15
RB15-16
RB15-16
RB15-16
RB15-16
RB15-12 15.0"
RB15-13 6"
RB15-13 24"
RB15-13 36"
RB15-13 52"
RB15-14 0.5'
RB15-14 18"
RB15-14 42"
RB15-15 0.5'
RB15-15 32"
RB15-15 50"
RB15-16 0.5'
RB15-16 1.5'
RB15-16 3.5'
RB15-16 3.5' Dup
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
1.25
0.5
2
3
4.3
0.5
1.5
3.5
0.5
2.6
4.2
0.5
1.5
3.5
3.5
Analyte
Unit
1,1,1,2-T etrachloroethane
ug/kg
<21000
<93
<110
<810
<71
<83
<3800
<74
<73
<6500
<1200
<78
<7700
<8100
<7200
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
ug/kg
<21000
<93
<110
<810
<71
<83
<3800
<74
<73
<6500
<1200
<78
<7700
<8100
<7200
1,1,2,2-T etrachloroethane
ug/kg
<21000
<93
<110
<810
<71
<83
<3800
<74
<73
<6500
<1200
<78
<7700
<8100
<7200
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ug/kg
<21000
<93
<110
<810
<71
<83
<3800
<74
<73
<6500
<1200
<78
<7700
<8100
<7200
1,1 -Dichloroethane
ug/kg
<21000
<93
<110
<810
<71
<83
<3800
<74
<73
<6500
<1200
<78
<7700
<8100
<7200
1,1 -Dichloroethylene
ug/kg
<21000
<93
<110
<810
<71
<83
<3800
<74
<73
<6500
<1200
<78
<7700
<8100
<7200
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
ug/kg
<100000
<470
<560
<4000
<350
<410
<19000
<370
<370
<32000
<5800
<390
<39000
<40000
<36000
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
ug/kg
<21000
<93
<110
<810
<71
<83
<3800
<74
<73
<6500
<1200
<78
<7700
<8100
<7200
1,2,3 -T rimethylbenzene
ug/kg
140,000
<93
770
1,700
<71
210
4,500
<74
970
16,000
<1200
160
8,900
15,000
17,000
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
ug/kg
<100000
<470
<560
<4000
<350
<410
<19000
<370
<370
<32000
<5800
<390
<39000
<40000
<36000
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
ug/kg
530,000
170
970
3,800
<71
190
11,000
<74
780
47,000
2,500
120
24,000
45,000
50,000
l,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
ug/kg
<100000
<470
<560
<4000
<350
<410
<19000
<370
<370
<32000
<5800
<390
<39000
<40000
<36000
1,2-Dibromoethane
ug/kg
<21000
<93
<110
<810
<71
<83
<3800
<74
<73
<6500
<1200
<78
<7700
<8100
<7200
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
ug/kg
<21000
<93
<110
<810
<71
<83
<3800
<74
<73
<6500
<1200
<78
<7700
<8100
<7200
1,2-Dichloroethane
ug/kg
<21000
<93
<110
<810
<71
<83
<3800
<74
<73
<6500
<1200
<78
<7700
<8100
<7200
1,2-Dichloropropane
ug/kg
<21000
<93
<110
<810
<71
<83
<3800
<74
<73
<6500
<1200
<78
<7700
<8100
<7200
1,3,5 -T rimethylbenzene
ug/kg
240,000
<93
440
770
<71
82
<3800
<74
150
12,000
<1200
<78
<7700
13,000
15,000
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
ug/kg
<21000
<93
<110
<810
<71
<83
<3800
<74
<73
<6500
<1200
<78
<7700
<8100
<7200
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
ug/kg
<21000
<93
<110
<810
<71
<83
<3800
<74
<73
<6500
<1200
<78
<7700
<8100
<7200
2-Butanone (MEK)
ug/kg
<100000
<470
<560
<4000
<350
<410
<19000
<370
<370
<32000
<5800
<390
<39000
<40000
<36000
2-Hexanone
ug/kg
<100000
<470
<560
<4000
<350
<410
<19000
<370
<370
<32000
<5800
<390
<39000
<40000
<36000
2 -M ethylnaphthalene
ug/kg
2,800,000
<470
1,200
54,000
<350
1,100
130,000
<370
1,000
380,000
12,000
570
290,000
430,000
500,000
2-Propanone (acetone)
ug/kg
<410000
<1900
<2200
<16000
<1400
<1700
<76000
<1500
<1500
<130000
<23000
<1600
<150000
<160000
<140000
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
ug/kg
<100000
<470
<560
<4000
<350
<410
<19000
<370
<370
<32000
<5800
<390
<39000
<40000
<36000
Acrylonitrile
ug/kg
<100000
<470
<560
<4000
<350
<410
<19000
<370
<370
<32000
<5800
<390
<39000
<40000
<36000
Benzene
ug/kg
690,000
<93
130
<810
260
96
<3800
<74
170
<6500
<1200
79
<7700
<8100
<7200
Bromobenzene
ug/kg
<21000
<93
<110
<810
<71
<83
<3800
<74
<73
<6500
<1200
<78
<7700
<8100
<7200
Bromochloromethane
ug/kg
<21000
<93
<110
<810
<71
<83
<3800
<74
<73
<6500
<1200
<78
<7700
<8100
<7200
Bromodichloromethane
ug/kg
<21000
<93
<110
<810
<71
<83
<3800
<74
<73
<6500
<1200
<78
<7700
<8100
<7200
Bromoform
ug/kg
<21000
<93
<110
<810
<71
<83
<3800
<74
<73
<6500
<1200
<78
<7700
<8100
<7200
Bromomethane
ug/kg
<82000
<370
<450
<3200
<280
<330
<15000
<300
<290
<26000
<4600
<310
<31000
<32000
<29000
Carbon disulfide
ug/kg
<21000
<93
<110
<810
<71
<83
<3800
<74
<73
<6500
<1200
<78
<7700
<8100
<7200
Carbon tetrachloride
ug/kg
<21000
<93
<110
<810
<71
<83
<3800
<74
<73
<6500
<1200
<78
<7700
<8100
<7200
Chlorobenzene
ug/kg
<21000
<93
<110
<810
<71
<83
<3800
<74
<73
<6500
<1200
<78
<7700
<8100
<7200
Chloroethane
ug/kg
<100000
<470
<560
<4000
<350
<410
<19000
<370
<370
<32000
<5800
<390
<39000
<40000
<36000
Chloroform
ug/kg
<21000
<93
<110
<810
<71
<83
<3800
<74
<73
<6500
<1200
<78
<7700
<8100
<7200
Chloromethane
ug/kg
<100000
<470
<560
<4000
<350
<410
<19000
<370
<370
<32000
<5800
<390
<39000
<40000
<36000
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
ug/kg
<21000
<93
<110
<810
<71
<83
<3800
<74
<73
<6500
<1200
<78
<7700
<8100
<7200
cis-1,3-Dichloropropylene
ug/kg
<21000
<93
<110
<810
<71
<83
<3800
<74
<73
<6500
<1200
<78
<7700
<8100
<7200
Cyclohexane
ug/kg
<100000
<470
<560
<4000
<350
<410
<19000
<370
<370
<32000
<5800
<390
<39000
<40000
<36000
Dibromochloromethane
ug/kg
<21000
<93
<110
<810
<71
<83
<3800
<74
<73
<6500
<1200
<78
<7700
<8100
<7200
Dibromomethane
ug/kg
<21000
<93
<110
<810
<71
<83
<3800
<74
<73
<6500
<1200
<78
<7700
<8100
<7200
Dichlorodifluoromethane
ug/kg
<100000
<470
<560
<4000
<350
<410
<19000
<370
<370
<32000
<5800
<390
<39000
<40000
<36000
Diethyl ether
ug/kg
<82000
<370
<450
<3200
<280
<330
<15000
<300
<290
<26000
<4600
<310
<31000
<32000
<29000
Diisopropyl Ether
ug/kg
<100000
<470
<560
<4000
<350
<410
<19000
<370
<370
<32000
<5800
<390
<39000
<40000
<36000
Ethylbenzene
ug/kg
900,000
210
210
2,100
450
310
20,000
<74
420
37,000
4,100
210
20,000
33,000
35,000
Ethyltertiarybutylether
ug/kg
<100000
<470
<560
<4000
<350
<410
<19000
<370
<370
<32000
<5800
<390
<39000
<40000
<36000
Hexachloroethane
ug/kg
<100000
<470
<560
<4000
<350
<410
<19000
<370
<370
<32000
<5800
<390
<39000
<40000
<36000
Isopropylbenzene
ug/kg
46,000
100
390
860
<71
310
<3800
<74
720
8,100
<1200
240
<7700
7,900
9,000
m & p - Xylene
ug/kg
1,700,000
190
270
<1600
<140
200
<7600
<150
280
<13000
<2300
<160
<15000
<16000
<14000
Methyl iodide
ug/kg
<21000
<470
<110
<810
<430
<500
<3800
<440
<440
<6500
<1200
<470
<7700
<8100
<7200
Methylene chloride
ug/kg
<41000
<190
<220
<1600
<140
<170
<7600
<150
<150
<13000
<2300
<160
<15000
<16000
<14000
Methyltertiarybutylether
ug/kg
<21000
<93
<110
<810
<71
<83
<3800
<74
<73
<6500
<1200
<78
<7700
<8100
<7200
Naphthalene
ug/kg
8,000,000
1,100
3,600
15,000
<350
2,500
330,000
<370
3,000
720,000
43,000
1,600
620,000
830,000
960,000
n-Butylbenzene
ug/kg
<21000
<93
<110
<810
<71
200
<3800
<74
<73
<6500
<1200
130
<7700
<8100
<7200
n-Propylbenzene
ug/kg
25,000
<93
120
<810
<71
110
<3800
<74
160
<6500
<1200
<78
<7700
<8100
<7200
o-Xylene
ug/kg
580,000
<93
270
<810
140
89
<3800
<74
140
18,000
<1200
<78
7,900
15,000
18,000
p-Isopropyl toluene
ug/kg
<21000
<93
<110
<810
<71
<83
<3800
<74
<73
<6500
<1200
<78
<7700
<8100
<7200
sec-Butylbenzene
ug/kg
<21000
<93
<110
<810
<71
<83
<3800
<74
<73
<6500
<1200
<78
<7700
<8100
<7200
Styrene
ug/kg
<21000
<93
<110
<810
<71
<83
<3800
<74
<73
<6500
<1200
<78
<7700
<8100
<7200
tert-Butylbenzene
ug/kg
<21000
<93
<110
<810
<71
<83
<3800
<74
<73
<6500
<1200
<78
<7700
<8100
<7200
tertiary Butyl Alcohol
ug/kg
<1000000
<4700
<5600
<40000
<3500
<4100
<190000
<3700
<3700
<320000
<58000
<3900
<390000
<400000
<360000
tertiaryAmylmethylether
ug/kg
<100000
<470
<560
<4000
<350
<410
<19000
<370
<370
<32000
<5800
<390
<39000
<40000
<36000
T etrachloroethylene
ug/kg
<21000
<93
<110
<810
<71
<83
<3800
<74
<73
<6500
<1200
<78
<7700
<8100
<7200
T etrahydrofuran
ug/kg
<100000
<470
<560
<4000
<350
<410
<19000
<370
<370
<32000
<5800
<390
<39000
<40000
<36000
T oluene
ug/kg
1,700,000
310
200
<810
87
200
<3800
<74
340
<6500
<1200
190
<7700
<8100
<7200
trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene
ug/kg
<21000
<93
<110
<810
<71
<83
<3800
<74
<73
<6500
<1200
<78
<7700
<8100
<7200
trans-1,3-Dichloropropylene
ug/kg
<21000
<93
<110
<810
<71
<83
<3800
<74
<73
<6500
<1200
<78
<7700
<8100
<7200
trans-1,4-Dichloro-2-butene
ug/kg
<100000
<470
<560
<4000
<350
<410
<19000
<370
<370
<32000
<5800
<390
<39000
<40000
<36000
T richloroethylene
ug/kg
<21000
<93
<110
<810
<71
<83
<3800
<74
<73
<6500
<1200
<78
<7700
<8100
<7200
T richlorofluoromethane
ug/kg
<21000
<93
<110
<810
<71
<83
<3800
<74
<73
<6500
<1200
<78
<7700
<8100
<7200
Vinyl chloride
ug/kg
<21000
<93
<110
<810
<71
<83
<3800
<74
<73
<6500
<1200
<78
<7700
<8100
<7200
NOTES:
ug/kg = micrograms per kilogram
< = The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported sample quantitation limit.
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 1
Site Characterization Report
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 7-1B SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR SVOC
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-12
RB15-13
RB15-14
RB15-15
RB15-16
Sample Name:
RBI 5-12 1-2'
RB15-13 2.5-3.5'
RB15-14 18"
RBI5-15 2-4'
RBI5-16 3-4'
Sample Date:
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
1-2
2.5-3.5
1.5
2-4
3-4
Analyte
TEC*
PEC*
Unit
1,2,4-T richlorobenzene*
8
18
ug/kg
<430000
<6300
<6200
<5400
<5500
2,4,5 -T richlorophenol
...
...
ug/kg
<710000
<10000
<10000
<8900
<9000
2,4,6-T ribromophenol
...
...
ug/kg
0.0
6,650
5,530
4,210
4,640
2,4,6-T richlorophenol
...
...
ug/kg
<710000
<10000
<10000
<8900
<9000
2,4-Dichl orophenol
...
...
ug/kg
<710000
<10000
<10000
<8900
<9000
2,4-Dimethylphenol *
290
290
ug/kg
<710000
<10000
<10000
<8900
<9000
2,4-Dmitrophenol
...
...
ug/kg
<3700000
<54000
<53000
<46000
<47000
2,4-Dmitrotoluene
...
...
ug/kg
<540000
<7900
<7800
<6700
<6900
2,6-Dmitrotoluene
...
...
ug/kg
<540000
<7900
<7800
<6700
<6900
2-Chloronaphthalene
...
...
ug/kg
<430000
<6300
<6200
<5400
<5500
2-Chlorophenol
...
...
ug/kg
<710000
<10000
<10000
<8900
<9000
2-Methyl-4,6-dinitrophenol
...
...
ug/kg
<3700000
<54000
<53000
<46000
<47000
2-Methylnaphthalene *
20.2
201
ug/kg
5,000,000
40,000
91,000
180,000
290,000
2-Methylphenol (o-Cresol)*
6700
6700
ug/kg
<710000
<10000
<10000
<8900
<9000
2-Nitroaniline
...
...
ug/kg
<1100000
<16000
<16000
<13000
<14000
2-Nitrophenol
...
...
ug/kg
<710000
<10000
<10000
<8900
<9000
3 & 4-Methylphenol
...
...
ug/kg
<1400000
<21000
<21000
<18000
<18000
3-Nitroaniline
...
...
ug/kg
<1100000
<16000
<16000
<13000
<14000
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
...
...
ug/kg
<430000
<6300
<6200
<5400
<5500
4-Chloro-3 -methyl-phenol
...
...
ug/kg
<430000
<6300
<6200
<5400
<5500
4-Chlorodiphenylether
...
...
ug/kg
<220000
<3200
^100
<2700
<2700
4-Nitroaniline
...
...
ug/kg
<1100000
<16000
<16000
<13000
<14000
4-Nitrophenol
...
...
ug/kg
<3700000
<54000
<53000
<46000
<47000
Acenaphthene*
6.7
89
ug/kg
3,100,000
39,000
78,000
150,000
230,000
Acenaphthylene*
5.9
128
ug/kg
280,000
<3200
3,500
5,500
6,600
Anthracene**
57.2
845
ug/kg
2,900,000
33,000
62,000
92,000
120,000
Azobenzene
...
...
ug/kg
<430000
<6300
<6200
<5400
<5500
Benzo [a] anthracene* *
108
1050
ug/kg
1,300,000
32,000
49,000
52,000
72,000
Benzo [ajpyrene* *
150
1450
ug/kg
960,000
28,000
41,000
42,000
56,000
Benzo [bjfluoranthene*
240
13400
ug/kg
1,100,000
29,000
43,000
32,000
49,000
Benzo [g,h,i]perylene *
170
3200
ug/kg
540,000
13,000
18,000
18,000
23,000
Benzo [kjfluoranthene*
240
13400
ug/kg
<430000
9,600
15,000
11,000
13,000
Benzyl Alcohol*
570
730
ug/kg
<5400000
<79000
<78000
<67000
<69000
Bi s(2-chloroethoxy)methane
...
...
ug/kg
<430000
<6300
<6200
<5400
<5500
Bi s(2-chloroethyl)ether
...
...
ug/kg
<220000
<3200
^100
<2700
<2700
Bi s(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
...
...
ug/kg
<220000
<3200
^100
<2700
<2700
Bi s(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
...
...
ug/kg
<540000
<7900
<7800
<6700
<6900
Butyl benzyl phthalate
...
...
ug/kg
<540000
<7900
<7800
<6700
<6900
Carbazole
...
...
ug/kg
1,200,000
<7900
<7800
<6700
<6900
Chrysene**
166
1290
ug/kg
1,300,000
30,000
46,000
49,000
67,000
Dibenz[a,h] anthracene* *
33
135
ug/kg
<430000
<6300
<6200
<5400
6,400
Dibenzofuran*
150
580
ug/kg
1,900,000
<7900
11,000
<6700
20,000
Diethylphthalate*
610
1000
ug/kg
<540000
<7900
<7800
<6700
<6900
Dimethyl phthalate*
530
530
ug/kg
<540000
<7900
<7800
<6700
<6900
Di-n-butyl phthalate*
2200
17000
ug/kg
<540000
<7900
<7800
<6700
<6900
Di-n-octyl phthalate*
580
45000
ug/kg
<540000
<7900
<7800
<6700
<6900
Fluoranthene**
423
2230
ug/kg
5,400,000
73,000
110,000
110,000
150,000
Fluorene**
77.4
536
ug/kg
2,800,000
23,000
50,000
65,000
97,000
Hexachlorobenzene
...
...
ug/kg
<430000
<6300
<6200
<5400
<5500
Hexachlorobutadiene
...
...
ug/kg
<220000
<3200
^100
<2700
<2700
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
...
...
ug/kg
<2200000
<32000
^1000
<27000
<27000
Hexachloroethane
...
...
ug/kg
<220000
<3200
^100
<2700
<2700
Indeno( 1,2,3 -c,d)pyrene *
200
3200
ug/kg
500,000
11,000
17,000
13,000
18,000
Isophorone
...
...
ug/kg
<220000
<3200
^100
<2700
<2700
Naphthalene**
176
561
ug/kg
74,000,000.
21,000
170,000
250,000
420,000
Nitrobenzene
...
...
ug/kg
<430000
<6300
<6200
<5400
<5500
N-Nitrosodimethyl amine
...
...
ug/kg
<540000
<7900
<7800
<6700
<6900
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine
...
...
ug/kg
<430000
<6300
<6200
<5400
<5500
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
...
...
ug/kg
<430000
<6300
<6200
<5400
<5500
Pentachlorophenol *
150
200
ug/kg
<3700000
<54000
<53000
<46000
<47000
Phenanthrene* *
204
1170
ug/kg
9,100,000
120,000
230,000
290,000
430,000
Phenol*
4200
12000
ug/kg
<710000
<10000
<10000
<8900
<9000
Pyrene**
195
1520
ug/kg
3,200,000
83,000
120,000
150,000
200,000
NOTES:
Bolded detected values exceed TEC screening value
Bolded and Shaded detected values exceed PEC screening value
ug/kg = micrograms per kilogram
< = The analyte was analyzed for, but was not detected above the reported sample quantitation limit.
NSL = No screening value
PEC = Probable effect concentration Development and
TEC = Threshold effect concentration. Development and Evaluation of
* Source: Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines, Recommendations for Use and Application, Publication No. WT-732 2003, WDNR December 2003.
** Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater Ecosystems (MacDonald et al. 2000).
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 1
Site Characterization Report
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 7-1C SEDIMENT RESULTS: FINGERPRINT
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
Sample Name:
Sample Date:
Depth Interval (ft):
RB15-12
RB15-13
RB15-14
RB15-15
RB15-16
RB15-12 1-2'
RB15-13 2.5-3.5'
RB15-14 18"
RB15-15 2-4'
RB15-16 3-4'
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
1-2
2.5-3.5
1.5
2-4
3-4
Fingerprint Analysis
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
DEQ Lab ID
1511040-21
1511040-19
1511040-12
1511040-09
1511040-05
Analysis Method
8270
8270
8270
8270
8270
Lab Code
Y20, Y25
Y20, Y25, Y34
Y20, Y25
Y20, Y25
100, Y20, Y25
Lab Code Description
Reporting Limits (RL) raised due to
matrix. Sample extract would not
concentrate to the normal volume causing
raised reporting limits.
Reporting Limits (RL) raised due to
matrix. Sample extract would not
concentrate to the normal volume causing
raised reporting limits. Pattern similar to
hydraulic and/or motor oil present in
sample.
Reporting Limits (RL) raised due to
matrix. Sample extract would not
concentrate to the normal volume causing
raised reporting limits.
Reporting Limits (RL) raised due to
matrix. Sample extract would not
concentrate to the normal volume causing
raised reporting limits.
No significant pattern
present for fingerprint.
NOTES:
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 1
Site Characterization Report
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 7-1D SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR GEN CHEM
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-12
RB15-12
RB15-13
RB15-13
RB15-13
RB15-13
RB15-13
RB15-14
RB15-14
Sample Name:
RB15-12 15.0"
RB15-12 1-2'
RB15-13 6"
RB15-13 24"
RB15-13 36"
RB15-13 2.5-3.5
RB15-13 52"
RB15-14 0.5'
RB15-14 18"
Sample Date:
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
1.25
1-2
0.7
2
3
2.5-3.5
4.3
0.5
1.5
Analyte
Unit
Total Cyanide
mg/kg
—
140
—
—
—
300
—
—
—
% Total Solids
0/
/O
59.4
58.0
71.2
63.0
64.9
63
81.1
76.9
67.5
NOTES:
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 3
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 7-1D SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR GEN CHEM
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-14
RB15-14
RB15-14
RB15-15
RB15-15
RB15-15
RB15-15
Sample Name:
RB15-14 18"
RB15-14 1-3'
RB15-14 42"
RB15-15 0.5'
RB15-15 32"
RB15-15 2-4'
RB15-15 50"
Sample Date:
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
1.5
1-3
3.5
0.5
2.6
2-4
4.2
Analyte
Unit
Total Cyanide
mg/kg
1,200
540
—
—
—
2.7
—
% Total Solids
0/
/O
64.3
64.4
80.2
79.9
77.7
74.4
81.1
NOTES:
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 2 of 3
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 7-1D SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR GEN CHEM
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-16
RB15-16
RB15-16
RB15-16
RB15-16
Sample Name:
RB15-16 0.5'
RB15-16 1.5'
RB15-16 3.5'
RB15-16 3.5' Dup
RB15-16 3-4'
Sample Date:
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
0.5
1.5
3.5
3.5
3-4
Analyte
Unit
Total Cyanide
mg/kg
—
—
—
—
40
% Total Solids
0/
/O
79.7
72.2
71.6
70.9
72.9
NOTES:
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 3 of 3
Site Characterization Report
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its Affiliate EA Science and Technology
TABLE 7-1E SEDIMENT RESULTS FOR NITROGEN
EA Project No.: 62561.25
Location ID:
RB15-12
RB15-13
RB15-14
RB15-15
RB15-16
Sample Name:
RB15-12 1-2'
RB15-13 2.5-3.5'
RB15-14 1-3'
RB15-15 2-4'
RB15-16 3-4'
Sample Date:
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
11/4/2015
Depth Interval (ft):
1-2
2.5-3.5
1-3
2-4
3-4
Analyte
Unit
Kjeldahl Nitrogen
mg/kg
4,300
2,600
2,600
760
1,400
NOTES:
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
Riverbend Area Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Page 1 of 1
Site Characterization Report
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
Appendix A
Field Logbooks and Data Collection Forms
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
Al. Core Processing Logbook
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
, io- u- 2of5 " ^
, ft?h tic-^ s
bk. ^jjyV- / lA-l a tvt ^ K ^
' : '' VVi ^ ¦y 4 £ "F, 5'u «vn,y
I- ; . i : ! ' | | • . : | ; .
oWy-u. h> , <^ ;
l^y ^Uj^(,>5"- i
*' ^ •"*¦«•- «"vt K - Cw.v,
Cj*x rA-.v" ^ ^ y'L-'' Ifc!,, i< <.wj
1 ^ h ic ^ ^|.
f * hrV 4"v\^.c^ '
_V J.jP^wiV"; I
'*-*! ^ ft. ^Si tk
-------
£• A" K<,"l(^v1k--^ fT / - ' - '-,"
-¦^Vil.prt. v'V ;"Va^ V~ ' r- i^uXiL
',»' 1 ( »C^ ifv' : ty /4t( 't •
•' < ".y v! k> S f* rf:
jf.M^l!f \ } K /Hj-ff.
1^. ^\j>.n I'K -i v< 4 '*/*'1 'n>/
' '¦ r •' * \c ^ I1- •" -11" ^ *s '¦
^.f (> u 4 v.- * i%-^s''
%a-L *& U;>paC& k->A^(} -,u
U^- „'< c * ^ p ^.-5 * >.d M ('ic
km~ |t<_ J.<..y
C{ s, -;,\"k f j, r,*„,v -fr P f\>^kp -x <
/:^ ,vi <#- C>y
i^ Q>d t~ ^v%.-\r\.^
! fr.^ N. j)^r£'^V^ K-.v^pi'k)
1 j 1 [ ] j j i 1 i i :, . ! .. i ! :
)?\op -V "V\.y.i,v k- (..«<<.
I f->K i?£\ V-^~' V\j?
I) fV V ^ |-y,
1 |*V f|l.it «h 6~. fM nl ,k£ ^ s,K W. (V k
h , p>y»i-< I »
i V>iv,v' •*<•>)( \3 )}rrlic^ |)/l^'JtY/» ¦
Iaa.C, k#.,r, f K
(/<:' i.' '# j,eVh4^4 -\1 '/ v,'^f.
^ |}rciic.\' £v |_) /"' /f
p-/ irvK-<_l^ '^/ rt < ,
I i^',c» k . Uo^i/Ik lj*<£
-------
]) f^Vf v, |I, 0 ^ r % > ^ > A. «f S^-H^.!la- • hS '.
P.6:< - -£urf
^lf^£,(^»c>. to - ?-4 - 15 <4| / *V ¦ 13
K - ;' \- "f$i, / »VSr.TiL_ ^ A M r<-
^f> li;, '5% V w /
x>,l(^ > i>a / '• \c ^
^y- , : i
^5>, Lx%*b !k-ii&^
."•§:#! /IWjS" 'ij'lfi w (' \ '/> ;jt . ^V*
^ f IU -f>
Un i-Owd. (srz-b S<-0c/<^av5
i »,t >4Vt.y • ;- / 1*n -K y t*-"!'&vf
1 1 • ^ \^ ' >'-. ! 3h""t""
/s /l't .,'•<" i -c. ,, A'1 i i i<_v , ^ >/K-^'iv
v^v c» .'«. k-.\<,~*J'z. :• V. \X^{^\
¦ { } ,>< • fy,» >'^c
'- ;u * -¦ v L
7/<' VvV.. y.« !y :
A,-^X f,y»( V i„\ ,\H • ¦ • • .K |V-(
--1.U/I r^" ri ty / 1 vhV 4.' .
K- -1 K> 01^*' »v 1 ^ cl>tf •>• 'f* 5
Mil# I Hrfc4- I
/: * . - -,i - «c{ \ -'."
i I i : t ; I ! : i I i ! I |
H ; -'M - $wt"
OALu -4,1
c 1 ¦¦¦¦i i -•¦ -" i
, ^ {.'/ ' t. 'V "•
! ' 7. - / 1../ !
SX iV< ? / '* '*•>', ''k* 1
/: : i I # : T i
" "¦ - - I J '
^ . ?>¦ * C
-------
! r/v,1.
m
t? (;
I**
K< 'Jf»
;*• if''- j { ¦
A^.ua /" '• /- •'k !l"
A —^ -V ^^ W
I 7
t d-
t//i / A ^*7? / J >{ W'
/ A;/ top
/ - " ^ /' |
-,^.r io-r-trd
Cti> - u_
% ' , "> V
6-
r. . . '-? t-v-S^* pK,'
\ ' Mfp^'i:
"," l '.) ) '..
lV-^5 C{rtO' 7
"\
' to
•?0 lOJV I
' is %o& '
Ho ZQ7V
l J /> fix
hicM r^,mi
'f\ / ' / ¦—
v-£
-------
10
1 HI .itlon IVL? , 1 1 I^JVl I'n^Date |P|
Project / Client CPa iZfAiorO 'T
l^^CUvSSorv w\ X
OXp -to 2" i
\O^VCX\ ScKjd
r\ * -fa
i\ | c
but —C£tn
7(V "W <*K|
s~be-^ ' fa¦'L A-OTDate /1i
11
Location iOs
Project / Client
-------
ocation,
i.Date {$2,|kl
Project / Client ....... _
|?7 y
y.c>»-...
i
( ,m fld^.
fdjlS
kJ
9 ^ M L?S
*'>"is-f |»
^.%NL..M:.iMi 3. .M.i^
Lh lM:.j
C^h*
>i j J/
££>15- fg - s-
..(!,:d.b::k4 \i' 1" %-C &L
I $-lf
& §ss
1 'i:: " • • ¦ • * -t , "«^.5D
:i
¦VV.-.u.- V> ¦ '! '
,y 1 ' *f», • * *_!• _ Date I kill
roiecl / Client '
l£I
>?¦
LJ
IH'i
• .fi
& :%
B? C?^pt.
2>.
f
if i£l"i i
»•" ^ .; , a.1
-------
s~\ . . .
:uent _J£l ^Jkj2^0sn^S.
JstjL^Sui
: >¦
if) , , .
\SQCZ%
v- ¦< '¦ •
f
'¦K\ I
v .-i drr--
fi: if- ^
H .4 %21-
UT
«"* Lf vv
17 A'f?
t -~\>!l-
t\$JS—P I
C/(Wj«4,... II
.1 >?*i,
¦
-------
Location
Project / Client
Location. Date. n^hr ¦
Project / Client
-------
18
Location
{ '} (\ /-Uy-u S ;' ' l'- i i : s;
^ -'v< u /! A ( ) •' ' '
I / » a a .. * -a-».
n-- v.* S 1 ¦ • V( > M ^^ v ^ u\( *
( i/Vs J' •: I '
I
Js,'"-' ' > ^ j A'^A.- A' A -T^"" /
/A 'A\? , w/ -\ 4 «f \\i„ <; ..
I ( 4- ">l s ' \ C ' 1 1 ii. • . I
A"" r v * ''X' 7* \ •/'. t
vi'A 1 •" \/*. ..">
UfVtivc" ', J -1 ti (V\ *> J**A AA<...-S' *„ <'
'¦*> ' '' ,f1'' f'l , = i'*
A: ' ^ *;'! >- |" {iL ¦ '-V A
,A Av _ ? a s-«.isC , /,v
jt'A> / v ' A"/ - f y.ii, j {/ij /(r > 4
' . « •> ; \ '" •'. N ' , • V'
-------
-------
f"?
-------
J J*i[I
{^/J_
s~\£f
*jkdf
\
X, i„
•*/ 2
Mj3
I!
fSi.it> .is
Il:.^&i£ <3 ^£lf5
/ A- '<^0:. / ?Ac^-2,
=¦/-
O^C?
*5 ft'Kzfli:.'..
1 - -l \ i^_M">'t,
'Qts B? a-t £
4—tt—fe&jScB^ v
-¦ / ?
Si If
1 I i I
//, 1
9i#s
ifr
/ I
-------
-------
/ Client.
7/7
w,
-J?
-giv
•jyrkl.
tC* •" s21«ci 4^p.re
f -* f ,:S-2 ' * I A <2."2r
• i /
y
Iff
-Oo.<.Ci
. js^o..
3e,':|fl._
VMi
>~T=D
Vi „-/f,|t>/
«z U&3&
1
-------
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
A2. Core Collection Logbook
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
V 2
CONTENTS
PAGE
REFERENCE
DATE
<*
—
L
motion QeJ: CJlA 'hA iWv~ Adc _ Date tI{ Od-
Dr«l<" t / Client ; ii, i/riXzA
rd
•k
Jtric
en
h>
d—
5a/n4-i
Kd
£
hXL
/v
0 4} - -er-^jrzcf
n , cc
eLu
Im
tCo -. £&c
T F- ^
f.!zR
-J——
id,
(H^yv/CT ] ^/, (\y.5~
«$!""
Y\^£^"-
X %
• 7 ^ A
qg _
ifflO
IX~A'
\-&*~'h or-. ~l. 6 /^-k o851^-'
¦H, \jQA^J
Vi/st'iQ-e
K-r
1$i idu^iS f oYv-rrMai Ltd".
/t ~-¦gU/ /pi^i/vV
L
u<
£
Cc*~
X
*-^2- clt/)^]s
A- Ajao/\
•f" (a/^;^
|^> f/j? !
VJU;.
A kl*Ai
ly Lt~
tfdvuA.cl' I
T^gyg! (tL
ffi..^, | r
l6
•» v~As
rH~
•/ !i _ g^"jfc
fjf\tp£r
9f*A ¦A-
%&. ' Al !/^y^- <9 >-%
-------
Locat,oni 1= Date j-1
Project / Client
— Mevifigc:
He.
// )
4-t> iaj:\
-------
Date wt5
7 &l£1?0
CF Irtsesil
;¦•¦'-
~M*~£d
yv l"»
I 10 £A f-^k tcf
W-,,4, 6r
' - ^f tp \
'£'; , dc— Vic^n
/ | P-ttf/SrA i ; !
'"v,*
P ;""'
itfs i jV<: ^vaTr^- - i... i ..
¦ ; " \f/rc Hfir^4.
' " ' ! 1 -''' Ji"
» : " 1 t^rtqs.eJi Mj4? /?) j~JL
w ~ :± '
'i- - %A",,..;r:
: M&J. ^
/¦ 'r\'X/°jf^ yf^y^eM ^Ukr.„
u^i s'r-v -
: - '
^ ' ! ; : '°t—
'" ; ' "'•'' ' A':'!' ¦'!•'. :^J7 ,w .
¦'- ' /.-,,• .^...¦,v ' 15
r—-:r^:J-~~- ' ' -
s^e/^r"r"^'H ^
\ \
r i- #- ^
-f- Pi-4^ ^
:. . ::
f 0/if <%?}&-\
m li... •' (VU ' '
# S'?P£ct_
i.tfef'-;
- -| . Ai?,
• -!'^3|^U(f /j-i f-i
: Se . ..li-.-i
?
l/v,
|i 7F j,J,
r «c,
'fitir&LLfy ckmk
•
s
j i
/"fe r &
i/v.v
fo-U
V:lS
|f
-------
p
Location J^^O^KiAlL
Project / Client
AltfLsAtgL
fA: Mp I ,h4ff • -W-i 'ii
/ ?;.i. ¦=
I £ CO
S.H0
\ll it.
"Mi?.,.fo
¦£*
¦.ifLp t£i-
t Ia-Ms, fid,
/ H ¦= ^> £ t./ (
j iii ^
. ed ^ ^
i «C ^f..
VIA' I
I
'%
&|,;4 U
, i i' /
J^rW*'.. #iAize,^
MMM:::" £
/|L:
nj I* f jfcS&i.
& Uttf-U- J...|4A..
-niv
-**4
rfZ vS2 //¦ ^ tt £&£*?. fL*..
T"7m.~ 6/u^l. J-QtwA~ Uiftr, ihlml
z:jQ^-ft£>i~ .JZdWsp klix-y £&£££ «*el
Location p^rr^d kivlI^AiLL i. i/iIlqAmu
Project / Client f<' t - --
i-'ri HCj T . ...A^v^5ljllik^a= •
-------
—
iff
10
Date
¦ t
J
Location . ky#/L Ml
Project / Client
_
"*? J c~»
\P^& .-J Sk:^\ m~ ^^../xertk ?*
¦Th;,'^ 4 ke '"A
¦ , '. /; ' (>/ U> >' -' .p ; ''
A-t
ih^
cUyK
..&K.C.h .<,»/ Sv-.. /!,"
Jj, , ". , , S •' - " . > ' - '' 1 >%>£•!
fiXAT 1*/&.% 't.b. .^(AjS..L .slh'^fk.
jI.^"
J] 5.5 ..t Cd.k^tA. ft
d^r, . : ^
s" HtPHA*
w
..../
A bA-
dl #'
¦""* -J -""
'unr M$~rIs'
ft tfe-w-fls <&*&
^ T7#i*y)
f^niSifVf' ..
f j^/4 / 4> /\i-^s4k
'$£ «. s'5 r
-ff 3 AN
?^s.±,AiW
i/»
!> t-
¦Jix
S,
yj-
#-
SiO
Jl
l/iVW
VM <2- fi /t
¦¦/*-/" -fi? it.;/ A e?£*. ^ 'p.:*1'"1 s:l ff »'*-¦
f,-i-ril&:
a
Jij,
(st%).
For.
..pv-± r\ ?
' aA' 4!-^. & h^ &
ii
fn - ^ ¦ i
A
1
¦Vo1:, h
"Ct.
01
;f /ttf / ?
jfec+'
^-4
4-j ^u,.±h]
i ¦¦
i\, / i / /
I Wi.,(e-L
!%i
. ¦¦ /[ ¦.' . C'l
-------
12
Location
Project / Client _fiv*r /^f"A fr/r-Wl?
ffirLxft--
L
if fi
0/1MT- 0^
J-i -Oi
\i'W T £?lL
i £ 3 -0-l 'XCf~
1*7 S>/o^cA
J— l/in(d
4r
Jl&vY)
I
-t-'
£^MV\ ^0
¦\ol
¦k M
)U<
£U*li
I
i y&v
-t
. i— 13
Location Tfcitor fovfig, A>f Date
Project / Client "flUggftHwC> | F3*3
a-t>VK
C&yt> }*nd 55 E 3 -"5 mpK
mctoiA
U'lk^ a
Icy
SxU
cax> MW
no \S5ttf S > j d>
. ¥lYiomW
4^
fc
-------
.ocation
Projs
,v:Tp. it Ci'-rntx. Date
:/ „ • W,tVt ;>'< lh — -
to -oH
ill i i-'YV.-1/
.ication I \jf, „ 1 I'lj.fl ft-1, DateI.Q.,
•olect / Client. k j ' T}J l f « J,«.
jjtegrf ...
-------
if 16
Location '
Date 44^34^
Project / Client
^5Q JcjKg^to^A-
\UGO jWu Up ^>pU^<
4octJ
rroo rr^uv.; -•}«<. >j u'v^d, ci/orut
Wut J - ] 4
M\qxlcA cyC) "te cur
EJl 3 k m.| dm4aoi-
^ xaAU^'6 C? ^SftCtT
000 *iy c^M — —I — ~["
1
T"
4
4
Location Date
Project / Client ?WEffitrTsib/ffifl rV MpO—
/Cl£> xVi £Ae /ta-i *1—
-------
Location 1
Pre
' client ^:ikE:ER£-*M
Date
»
!X
¦ 1 f *»-
r "tX), \
'&0 W 'iJ car#\:fl. V , - N •"1
HuS vrtx&Mk Vtartyj
10 AH
' •'n- v-1 '• \ If.. •» "'-1° •
Is So i%w#C 7-^-
105-r.
i'i ^i-F
j f F'tb... •
.cofnplt
to...
M vnv,;,.x VlV Vi
.llLl^. oolUci
irv, o; ;
.l®!ke
O.^'iCf:. j .i#.;I. .1',
Ml#M. Jy
Y^f .. .. 6o I. ,|. Ct XifSI
'JO J.:
?Et^~ i|3
4... Sftjytfc,..
^ " i
tjy
j
.iJ,!•*%(' a,
n,
i/ii
IMAM f***
,tWj.. j....1o.
€*#«
W.| fat
-------
' / Ivi" F /
± M
A 0 i
3 /
,^U>
ils»f
•> Jl
Jpf 5
mlQl M...
Iffftf
/„f
I
rih y -(6 i
-*->sp f.~" i -1:
f »' '' J,'' y' ' f ,
- .klLt^k/. j : L
i. 1". :i\t M'P-.in
(L
B^W,
It j
hi Uv
1 m 0\
j iFttstf1
; y
"* ,Jh( j a <**
?.
-tfe-i.
k
I'd
ii-
'J I'v'
! s /I, J, i'
• * , •;' , ,i / , •; > " i
, 'if- ;'?'
11 ! = /* i ^
V
r
n i i
i
-I J i
«-n i
i« >/ L / Ls>
Ji* ff cA. # ^
/ :¦
' ^ '' '1 S / , 1 s.
fM, i/j
-------
Location
Project /
¦X$\
s; ,r .p,i:r
Date
\V o <> .•* , ¦ i ;A
(vis,
+¦
>w
$ gtih/i$€j &A
k
. c-l e$L>.
0 ~jr) 4
L~o ((jt->
C.° Ik
. \0 -4-k
*r £e
pfjQtg
•5e-
CUJf-tjxk
Sat;... I
"""} «-4ffe>v^,p .
^ I tfc. .£J€^ '¦¦
?jm
1M^-
br\ »Vr\. . c'
gJiO'A.5 (4j£t4
te .o&
tf'?*
^ ic #-S
h
¦a ....
¦»
j ...
."3 ..rf_, s 5 Jd-Jd-"
., ..... ,
Hon
|f(7 j'ro.i' KiV-tr hflC'
Date
:t / Client .fciMtWIi.
gxgy
rA,
? f
i
to
Ai if*
?_5 &
0~
oS
ti
30
J.P... *^:
i
MU A.
•A
Me
(Ilk,
r let.
•/it#
et
:
n.
X
cy§r*
9
y<)
... „
4
/..gf.
xAr.:c
\f)S\
pktkh
'¥5 i€<'..€
f J.
...
(&
(?(?r
."2/3 k
-------
¦Til
40!
- it
Uft"
1 iMfadr
' ¦"• • • 1 2p^cM>-.U^X-.>
/
-------
-------
28
Location I C)ate®
« .. . ¦' 1 V tf ...¦¦¦ / " ' 'V t
Project / Client -Ufia U~^-
ife. A
c
..'fil-d-ii-* jji- *
»,JfcC«v*i »L
...ocation j^Cju
J2iJD±ikM^LMh
Date,,.
Project / Client
_ _ -W*d< , ' '
i
/U/L^;
.¦I,
-------
Location .
17,7 fcvtlT Date jffi t-f
Project / Cent _
-70 T
^ Id L^\er\ I ^ ^"" °^|
]] U*) -± CoM< j/-L'Cjx $<%
1 £/ / pf^ rf.c.<|i
ilifc
— S hi -f^h ("ffr~ "j^ _^A
bare* aJik&-~tr- -i ^
/1 &
)~hl S — ty> J*fi*zzL A£/£pM
; ^ '3 5 i^/T- LcdXi0V\ \ aJT-( $ I > J-"
/~3*fr£~ SZp&icti
_ _ ~~ "Tfe^AnI
_ L A/ /
/^J 5r
rt^ev-jZ-ri^ ^)/^-_£~h\
J ] pn. C 0V"\p \t\i?j^W- ^'f
( 4o */'(¦/ /ty-fAi _AJC4Jte^^=i IhCrd^h
f - ^g. g%Mjil—^
(pfAjZ&nJ
\£&±_ Aj^-
J ^7 ^,
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
A3. Field Data Collection Forms
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
LITHOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science & Technology Inc PBC
Client Name and Project Mama
Location/Boring Name
!) fi K - f) 1
Sheet
; of
1 Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Start Date/Time
Stop Date/Time
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
iVih > t;< •' '¦>
6 Latitude/Northirig/Gnd
9 Sed Surface Elevation
10 Coordinate System H V i^wica
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
3 Operator Name (License # If Required)
7 Longitude/Eastmg/Gnd
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions wind direction)
, ' Sunny/Cloudy/Ram
Sampling Equipment and Methodology {Check One)
Rotosoriic. -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: -ft barrel
Grab Sample: \t -ft x
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boting Depth (ft)
in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
ft x 0.6 -ft Box'Ponar/Van Veen/Other
14 < Recovery (ft)
15 J/o Recovery
18 Location Notes
o (¦
y^n 6'?-7. ^ o
if -ic> / :i/ {
IH""5) 6 --fif-* (tCri^r^ pte>r, k c t c 1
fi /h,sk , 1, .V A r* mwy ( »-h)
jC|< ^ if ff' u^iff/J-f ^yf I *'
1 hffrjbA/v 3'0ff pi-ih } f> fi- ( $S?:) fvc.h yy"^f
f' / 1 "1 <-l ""J ?-/. j U" t / 1 , £ f "~7',r4.
I hn "5 si. tl
^ d.u.J- \ H tl«m- ) H
•t ij j :> L-f / -":i i i't f, }—
A. / !
-------
-------
:k\
jgJII LITHOLOG1C LOG
Sediment Collection Log
tA Engineering, Science & lachnoloqy Ire HBC
Client Name and Project Name
u a-. •
¦"'(1 i- '
Location/Bonng Name
'I'"
Sheet
f of I
i
Geologist Ndme/Signalufp
6 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Start Date/Tim©
Slop Date/Time
11, ' ,
" _ y ,
2
a ~'i 4
Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
6 Latitude,'Northing/Grid
9 Sed Surface Elevation «
ft
MAYEGQ
~*r ' ^ i 1
10 Coordinate System
n t ) i s
V
11 Depth of Water, ft
start end}
fjoerntor Ndine if fcense # If Required)
7 LongitucJe.'Easting'Gnu
'¦ 'H : ' : ..
12 Weather (Temp, c»cle conditions, wind direction)
SunnyCloudy'Rain
4
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
13 Boring Depth (ft)
I \ Recovery ifu
15
* Recover^/
Rotosonic: -ft barrel -in diameter
H
Core: -ft barrel -in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
X
Grab Sample: 0
-ft X -ft X
'• ¦ -ft BoxfPonar/Van Veen/Other
16 Location Notes
—
Other:
Sample Collection Wiethe
d:
interval
(Depth)
Description of Materials
7i i;ti'' tjimci i tire, color, presence of SAV'rtvt, wonri oiior shewi uthu' unJuvuris
Sample ID
uses
Code
-
tl ...iVxif,
pr
fa ^ UL-tUo ^ tfc^|
Other:
-------
UTHOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology, Inc., PBC
Client Name and Project Name
Location/Boring Name
V'.V. ¦ -in diameter
Core: -I! barrel -in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
Grab Sample: _ -t x ____ -ft x -ft Box/Ponar/Van Veen/Other
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boring Depth (ft) 14 Recovery (ft) 15% Recovery
16 Location Notes
Interval
(Depth)
Recovery
(ft & %)
Description of Materials Sample ID PID
Munsell Coior; Moisture: Density Consistency (Other Remarks) Sample Interval (ppm)
uses
Code
¦\ V
n'i • ' \vt
Is ' • 1 ( >
i i -• ! !, i _ )• •1 11w ! 1 1 1; 1' ''
)
i ' i
y\ \ H i >, i
bu i i L
... \> jA,,.
i j> . » , 1 • < •
' 1
- V .
1 . 3
*-f r -
>
•> t ' ' , i.
\ 1 ' t ^ » ! L ( ^ l, * # \ i ' > i '| ,
U' •' ¦ \
•. i i
I1
.511 kJ (Mip / {gfaJfil
„ m „ ¦¦¦ ¦¦ 5
)
> 1
^ 1
I ' ' I ' ;
' * "' > v:
S i ,
r i ;
li\ i , ' 1 <• M ; • ,
f ( 1 >1. S * 1 1 (
HI, «
l' < Mu h
U ; 1 1,'. • , \ v. ; ¦
«y
-------
LiTHGLGGSC LOG
bvdiment Collection Log
EA Engineering Science & Technology Inc PBC
Ghent Name and Project Name
LocatiorvQoring Name
J
Sheet
of
1 Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
Start Date/Time
IV") fCri
Stop Date/Time
fc'i sdrT I i
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
6 Latitude/Northmg/Grid
9 S«d Surface Llevatson
10 Coofdmatc System
I
4AP83 V
H Depth of Watui H i.stort/eruh
3 Operator Name (License # if Required)
7 Longitude/Easting'Grid
12 Weathei (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
Sunny/Cloudy'Rain
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic -ft bairel -in diameter
Core -ft barrel
Grab Sample w -ft x
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boring Depth (ft)
in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
ftx -ft Box'Ponar/7an Veen/Other
14 Recovery (ft)
15 Recovery
16 Location Notes
Interval
lueptm
Description of Materials
M.ipr jpdimmttype color Dftbonceot?A\/r:;ci
-------
jll'Wfe UTHOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology, Inc., PBC
Client Name and Project Name
Location/Boring Name
< ' 1 „
t
Sheet
of 1
1
Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
1 fi U^/11' Ml/ ^ ^
8 Date/Time Collected
Date/Time Processed
:• .v
2
Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
6 Latitude/Nortbing/Grid
9 Sed Surface Elevation
ft
MATECO
10 Coordinate System
H
V
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
3
Operator Name (License # if Required)
7 Longitude/Easting/Grid
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind
Surirty/Ctoudy/Rain
direction)
4
Sampling Equipment arid Methodology {Check One)
13 Boring Depth (ft)
14 Recovery (ft)
15
% Recovery
Rotosonic; >\ \ -t barrel -in diameter
Core: -ft barrel -in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
¦ i
—
Grab Sample; -ft x -ft x
Other:
-1! Box/Ponar/Van Veen/Other
16 Location Notes
Sample Collection Method:
Interval
(Depth)
Recovery
Munseil Color; Moisture; Density; Consistency (Otter Remarks)
Sample ID P1D
Sample Interval (ppmj
uses
Code
-------
m
L1TH0L0GIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
E& Engineering, Science & Technology Inc, PBC
Client Name dud P/oject Name
1 ocation/Boring Name
_^21
Sheet
of 1
1 Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
6 Start Date/Time
Stop Date/Time
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
6 Latitude/Northing'Grid
9 cied Surface Elevation
10 Coordinate System
H
V U/\t
11 Depth of Watei, ft (start/end)
3 Operator Name (License # If Required)
j
7 Longitude,'Eastmg'Grid
12 Weather (Temp circle conditions, wind direction)
Sunny/Gloudy/Raip
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic, -ft barrel -in diameter
Core. -ft barrel
Grab Sample: C -ft x
Other-
Sample Collection Method;
13 Boring Depth (ft)
in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
ft x ^ v. -tt Box'Ponar/Van Veen/Other
14 Recovery (ft)
15 Hn Recovery
16 Location Notes
Description of Materials
Major Sediment lyp€. color, piesence of $M\/,rocknvorvj odor s''0un otr^r iwJusiono
¦ ¦ n iniiiry ,
Interval
(Depth)
Sample ID
uses
Code
~>ivjnv iw\
Other:
'VI3" o(- (.ttu 1",; l/U'V{
L-KiM tAmjji'X Kj \€%~ \o (i Suibl
W \»\ ,:v{
-------
UTHOIOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology. Inc, PBC
Client Name and Project Name
Location/Boring Name
Sheet
1 of t
1 Geologist Name/Signature
M
5 Project Number
6256125
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Date/Time Collected
Date/Time Processed
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
8 Latitude/Northing/Grid
Sed Surface Elevation
10 Coordinate System
H
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
3 Operator Name (License # If Required)
? Longitude/Easting/Grid
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
Sunny/Cloudy/Rain
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic: -ft barrel • -in diameter
Core: -ft barrel __
Grab Sample: -ft x
Other:
13 Boring Depth (ft)
•in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
¦ft x -ft Box/Ponar/Van Veen/Other
14 Recovery (ft)
15 % Recovery
18 Location Notes
Interval
(Depth)
Recovery
(ft&%)
Description of Materials
Munsell Color, Moisture, Density; Consistency (Other Remarks)
Sample ID
Sample Interval
PID
(ppm)
uses
Code
n
fSiv olHo
___
04- S
o
iaxI ctf tan 3
(
"fivacv:
<^VY
fY'\ LfflvYU Ci |
V\C OCiMC
Irs f
c U /.
-------
Lll HOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
f A rnnuifeiniq Smncc & Technology, Inc PBC
Client Nam<= and Project Name
Location/Boung Name
Sheet
of 1
Geologist Nome*Signature
Yv Jietl|vA¥\ : ,
5 Project Numbe*
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Start Date/Time
Stop Date/Time
imi J i s
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
b Latitude/Northing/Grid
G* f • .
9 Seel Surface Elevation
Vf!
10 Coordinate System
H
V y.fi
11 Depth of Water ft (stait'cndj
3 Operator Name {License # If Required)
7 Longitude'Easting/Grid
i • ; - ' i ¦ : '/
\A Weather (I emp curie conditions v/fnd direction)
SunnyCloudy/Ram
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosomc: -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: _____ "ft barrel
Grab Sample: 0 -ft x
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boring Depth (ft)
-in diameter Manual Pusb/Vibracore
-ftx -ft Box'Ponar/7an Veen/Other'
14 Recovery (tt)
1 b vu Recovery
16 Location Motes
Interval
(Depth/
Description of Materials
Major Sea-ment tvDC- to jr p-esiina of lor-Kwooa f-dui stent other induson*7,
Sample ID
uses
Code
li
Other:
}'/ CC "2 " /
-~.,V j3
i. :
' • * 1 w
I) f
'1
\VV
i. ¦
¦ T i
v ri'
t i>!»*
SVt M
3> ^
LC
c^d(\ v
: , \ -
-------
EA
UTHOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology. Inc., PBC
Client Name and Project Name
Location/Boring Name
Sheet
t of f
1 Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Date/Time Coiiecteci
.ill
Date/Time Processed
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
6 Latitude/Northing/Grid
3 Sed Surface Elevation
10 Coordinate System
H
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
3 Operator Name (License # If Required)
7 Longitude/Easting/Grid
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
Sunny/Cloudy/Rain
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonlc; ' -ft barrel _ -in diameter
Core: -t barrel
Grab Sample: ___ -ft x
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boring Depth (ft) 14 Recovery (ft) 15 % Recovery
¦in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
¦ft x -t Box/Ponar/Van Veen/Other
18 Location Notes
Interval
(Depth)
Recovery
Description of Materials Sample ID PID
Munsell Color: Moisture, Density: Consistency (Other Remarks) Sample Interval {ppm)
uses
Code
v-k
(0
¦.,
¦
•
%- hi IS" i..Aj ~~ i l)'
> •-_»
tii'J.jTV V tlj
( t: !ku"
. .
-------
jjg^ LITHOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
LA hngineeung Science & Technology Inc PBC
Client Name and Project Name
' I <¦,' 1
Location/Boung Name 1 Sheet
. a „ ¦ l |1 of f
1 Geologist Name/Signature
. . .-»¦ ¦ r ,
• ,D; ¦
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Start Date/Tims
I 1 V
1 ; •1 1
Stop Date/Time
; . i ; ' i
2 Drilling Subcontractoi 'Equipment Operator
6 Latitude/Northmg'Gnd
'cot !
S Sed Surface Elevation - * ; ' '
10 Coordinate System H ¦ v, V 1
11 Depth of Water tt (stait/bndi
3 Operator Name (Licence # If Reqtwedl
7 Longitude/Easting'Grid
12 Weathes (Temp circle conditions,,wind direction)
Sunnv/CioudyRain
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosomc _____ -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: _____ -ft barrel -in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
Grab Sample: 0 -ft x -ft x ¦ -ft Box'Ron a r/7a n Veen/Other
Other:
13 Bonng Depth (ft)
14 Recovery (ft)
15 % Recovery
16 Location Notes
Sample Collection Method:
Interval
(Depthi
Description of Materials
Mapr Sediment type color presenct'ol SAV'roA.«uC»l uDO' s'leen. other iiic'iai- n1.
Sample ID
uses
Code
^ f * fit/I ¦ \ uncwv
VrVo'v-*
Other:
-------
L1TH0L0GIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology, Inc, PBC
Client Name and Project Name
Location/Boring Name
Sheet
1 of *1
1 Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Date/Time Collected Date/Time Processed
ML
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator '
8 Latitude/Northing/Grid
9 Sed Surface Elevation
10 Coordinate System H
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
3 Operator Name (License # If Required)
7 Longitude/Easting/Grid
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
Sunny/Cloudy/Rain
4 Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
13 Boring Depth (ft) 14 Recovery (ft) 15 % Recovery
Rotosonic:
-ft barrel
Grab Sample: -ft x
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
-In diameter
-in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
-ft x -f Box/Ponar/Van Veen/Other
18 Location Notes
Interval
(Depth}
Recovery
fft 8 %)
Description of Materials 1 Sample ID PIP
Munsell Color; Moisture; Density; Consistency (Other Remarks) Sample Interval fppmj
uses
Code
i
i
* J 1 1 i <
i „
1 : ' : —""""—
-s 1
-------
E
m
£4 Enqmeennq Science
UTHOLOGIC LOG
buchment Collection Log
& Technology Inc., PBC
Client Name and Project Name
Location/Bonng Nama
^ ' CM
Sheut
1 of 1
1
Geotugist Ndme.'Signature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
K ,n h^ihih {14 //
: i : i! i :L
8 Start Date/Time
Stop Date/Time
,t
2
Drilling Subcontractoi/Equipment Opfciatoi
6 Latitude/Northing/Grid
& Sed Surfacu Elevation
ft
MATECO
% , , , i >
- - i ; , i«
10 Coordinate System
H v »/
V
' 4'
11 Depth of Water, ft ^start'end)
3
Operator Name (License U If Required)
7 Longitude'Easting/Gnd
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions wind direction)
Sunny/Cfoudy'Rain
4
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
13 Bonng Depth (ft)
14 Recovfciy(tt)
15 7o Recovery
Rotosonic -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: -ft barrel -in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
—
Grab Sample- 0
Other:
-ft X -ft X
-ft Box'Ponai/7an Veen/Other
16 Location Notes
Sample Collection Method:
Interval
(Depth)
Description of Materials
Maior Scdiirent type color p'esenc of cj>V'rock wood c.ior .sheen other inclusions
Samplo ID
uses
Code
Other;
to
ULf) - I v-
^ ij )J$J:
A
f'.' S' •
«« V) w 51' .
f,v ?s. w
rt""i'm-4:'
C ; alt. to :Vy. 3g.<|1
tt.r
-------
M
LITHOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology, Inc., PBC
Client Name and Project Name
Location/Boring Name
Sheet
1 of
1 Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Date/Time Collected
Date/Time Processed
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
6 Latitude/Northing/Grid
9 Sed Surface Elevation
10 Coordinate System H
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
3 Operator Name (License # If Required)
7 longitude/Easting/Grid
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
Sunny/Cloudy/Rain
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic: ¦;' -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: -ft barrel
Grab Sample: -ft x
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boring Depth (ft) 14 Recovery (ft) 15 % Recovery
-in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
-ft x -ft Box/Ponar/Van Veen/Other
16 Location Notes
Interval
(Depth)
Recovery
Description of Materials
Munseil Color; Moisture; Density; Consistency (Other Remarks)
Sample ID
Sample Interval
PID
(ppm)
uses
Code
O-iiii"
d. irau
/ CNfA \
kKt 5
/ Xh
dixit. v~\ |^
. ''
'-"J
ii- \,M
EEvvo'f-
_
dhytUMttf/ (t
#)?¦;£w ir
-------
LITHOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
BA bngmetumg Science & Tvchnotogv Inc . P8C
Client Name and Project Name
LocatiorvBoring Name
tilV
Sheet
. of 1
1 Geologist Name/Signature
, : iV;' ( I
k *
5 PiOjfect Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Start Date/Ttme
Stop Date/Time
? Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment operator
8 Latitude/Northiny/Gnd
9 Sed Surface Elevation
10 Coordinate System
H H \ V
11 Depth of Water ft istai1/cnd)
3 Operator Name (License # If Required)
Longitude'Easting'Grid
, ,
12 Weather (Temp circle conditions, wind direction)
^unny/Cioudy/Rain
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic: _____ -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: -ft barrel
Grab Sample: n -ft x
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
13 Bonng Depth (ft)
in diameter Manual PushA/ibracore
ft x 1 -ft Box'Ponar/Van Veen/Other
14 Recovery (ft)
15 % Recovery
16 Location Notes
Interval
(Depth)
Description of Materials
Major Sediment type, rutar, presence >">' SAV/iock wuod edor'Sheen other inclusions
Sample ID
uses
Code
-V • }~f
r n>
Other:
a/IC? '> ^ cia
ry\o.'2> tot ¦'] '¦> ^
-------
UTHOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology, Inc.. PBC
Client Name and Project Name
Location/Boring Name
Sheet
of
1 Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Date/Time Collected
Date/Time Processed
>Jf /
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
6 Latitude/Northing/Grid
9 Sed Surface Elevation
10 Coordinate System
H
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
3 Operator Name (License # If Required)
7 Longitude/Easting/Grid
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
Sunny/Cloudy/Rain
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic: _J___ -ft barrel ', -in diameter
Core; ____ -ft barrel
Grab Sample: -ft x
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boring Depth (ft) 14 Recovery (ft) 1S % Recovery
¦in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
•ft x -ft Box/Ponar/Vart Veen/Other
16 Location Notes
Interval
(Depth)
Recovery
Description of Materials
Munsell Color; Moisture; Density, Consistency (Other Remarks)
Sample ID
Sample Interval
PIO
(ppm)
uses
Code
%nfS P}£
^ -01-
CX3lC»
Q-
v*:} I.AJ
W'l JL- (JJUA^
n
p"]
-------
UTHOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science & Technology, Inc.. PBC
Client Name and Project Name
Location/Boring Name
Sheet
1 of 1
1 Geologist Name/Signatuie
5 P'ojeci Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Start Date/Time
Stop Dato/Time
2 Dnlhng Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
6 latitude/Northing/Grid
9 Sed Surface Elevation
?0 Coordinate System H
V NAVD8
Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
3 Operator Name (License # if Required)
7 Longitude/Eastmg/Gnd
-¦J
12 Weathei (1 emp circle conditions- wsnd direction t
Sunny/Clouav/Rasn
4 Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic. -ft ban el -in diameter
Core -ft barrel -in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
Grab Sample: u -ft x -ftx <¦, ¦ -ft Box'Ponar/yan Veen/Other
Other
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boring Depth (ft) 14 Recovery (ft) t h Recoveiy
18 Location Notes
Interval
(Depth)
Description of Materials
Major Scdwenlfyps cm-.r pressrre pf bA7 *jc f wocm odor^een oinor
-------
LITHOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology, Inc., PBC
Client Name and Project Name
Location/Boring Name
Sheet
of f
1 Geologist Name/Signature
"I,
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Date/Time Collected
WI
Date/Time Processed
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
Latitude/North rng/G rid
Sed Surface Elevation
10 Coordinate System
H
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
3 Operator Name (License # If Required)
7 Longitude/Eastirtg/Gfid
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
Sunny/Cloudy/Rain
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic: • -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: ___ barrel
Grab Sample: -ft x _
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boring Depth (ft)
•in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
¦ft x -ft Box/Ponar/Van Veen/Other
14 Recovery (ft)
15 % Recovery
18 Location Notes
Interval
(Depth)
Recovery
(ft&%)
Description of Materials
Munsell Color; Moisture; Density; Consistency (Other Remarks)
Sample ID PID
Sample Interval (ppm)
uses
Code
ij|* Gxtcii
A I*
t dl&M
icli )
-------
E
m
IZA Pngmeenng Snencf
LITHOIOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
5 Technology Inc P3C
Client Name and Project Name
Locations Boring Name
i-r.
Sheet
1 of f
1
Geologist Name'Sigratute
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
11 lvv)\ a r^'L y
8 Start Date/Time
Stop Date/Time
1 ii ' ,
h-
2
Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
8 Latitude/Northing/Grid
9 bed Surface Elevation " ,
n
'¦ i-
10 Coordinate System
V
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
3
Operator Name (License # If Requited)
7 Longitiicie/Eastfng/Gnd
C'% - •
_ v ' 1 * f
12 Weather (Temp circle conditions, wind diiection)
^ Sunny/Cloudy/Rain
4
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
13 Boring Depth (ft)
14 Recovery (tti
15
°t Recovery
Rotosonic -ft barrel -in diameter
Core -ft barrel -in diametei Manual Push/Vibracore
jC
;
Grab Sample- 0
"ft X -ft X
-ft Box'Ponar/Van Veen/Other
18 Location Notes
Other;
Sample Collection Method.
Interval
{Depth)
Description of Material©
.Vinor tinmen* l>r>b coins ^ru-eme t1SAV rock wf\»d naor src„t-n oth^r
-------
EA
UTHOLOGiC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science, & Technotogy. inc., PBC
Client Name and Project Name
Location/Boring Name
Sheet
i of
1 Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Date/Time Collected
im v'~r
Date/Time Processed
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
Lafitude/Northing/Grid
9 Sed Surface Elevation
10 Coordinate System
3 Operator Name (License # If Required)
7 Longitude/Easting/Grid
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
Sunny/Cloudy/Rain
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic: ' -ft barrel . -in diameter
Core; _____ ^ barrel -in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
Grab Sample: -ft x _____ -ft x -ft Box/Ponar/Vart Veen/Other
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boring Depth (ft) 14 Recovery (ft) 15% Recovery
16 Location Notes
Sample 10 j P1D
Sample Interval j (ppm)
Interval
fDepthj
Recovery
m&%)
Description of Materials
Munsell Color, Moisture. Density. Consistency (Other Remarks)
uses
Code
~ >0'
(Cr-r)
-------
UTHOLOGiC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology. Inc.- PBC
Chont Name and Project Name
location/Boring Name
/'•:= • I I
Shett
i of '
1 Geologist Name/Signatuie
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
Start Date/Time
Stop Date/Time
2 Drilling Subeontractor/Equioment Operator
hJx. LCD
6 latitude/North,tfiq/Gnd
9 Sed Surface Elevation
10 Coordinate System H
V NAVD;
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
3 Operator Name (License # If Required)
7 Longitude(Easting/Gnd
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
' / Sunny/bloudy/Rain
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic: -ft barrel _____ -in diameter
Core; -ft barrel _____ -
Grab Sample* -ft x
Other;
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boring Depth (ft)
-in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
-fix 0 -3 -ft Box/Ponar/v/an Veen/Other
14 Recovery (tt)
15 % Recoveiy
16 Location Notes
Interval
{DepthI
Description of Materials
Major Sfilimeiii lyoe rotor prpsenre of SAVrreUvood orjorisheen other inclUiiortE
Sample ID
uses
Code
V
Vi
wvti a 1 s <
tkij u
10 ¦;«.* ' -b1* !
Other:
-------
LITHOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering. Science. & Technology, Inc., PBC
Client Name and Project Name
Location/Boring Name
Sheet
of 1
1 Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Date/Time Collected Date/Time Processed
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
8 Latitude/Northing/Grid
9 Seel Surface Elevation
10 Coordinate System H
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
3 Operator Name (License # If Required)
7 Longitude/Easting/Grid
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
Sunny/Cloudy/Rain
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosoriic: -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: -It barrel
Grab Sample: -ft x
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boring Depth (ft) 14 Recovery (ft) 15 % Recovery
¦in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
¦ft x -ft Box/PonarA/an Veen/Other
16 Location Notes
Interval
(Depth)
Recovery
Description of Materials
Munsell Color: Moislore: Density: Consistency (Other Remarks)
Sample ID PID
Sample Interval (pprn}
uses
Code
d tfjTOkj ¦
kiJi CM Kr*'j !•"*! 0,
^idka—i
lo'?, rruttHl
1 :
¦jCwH
0/ , i
\<(\r\\ ' HC odo/'
f
M
'> I ¦ ff<1 "
-------
LITHOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
£A Enuinaeung Sounce 5 frchnolotjv Inc PBC
Client Name and Project Name
LocatiorVBonng Name
Sheet
of i
1 Geologist Name/Signature
Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Start Date/Time
Stop Date/Time
i) 5
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
VlA'il: O
6 LatitudeMorthingkSriel
9 Sed Surface Elevation
0 Coordinate System H v
11 Depth of Water ft (stan/end)
3 Operator Name (License # If Required}
i Longitude/Eastmg/Gnd
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions wind direction)
", ; Sunny/Cloudy/Rain
Sampling Equipment and Methodology {Check One)
Rotosonic -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: -ft barrel
Grab Sample: -ft x
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
13 Bonng Depth (ft) 14 Recovery (tt) 15% Recovery
in diameter Manual Pusb/Vibracore
ft x -ft Box;Ponar//an Veen/Other
16 Location Notes
„m /
Interval
fDepth.I
Description of Materials
Major Sfstocnt typo, color, presence of SAV.rack'iwwd Oder sheen, other inclusions
Sample ID
uses
Code
Other;
i'-i '
- - 4 ' -i
h r
S
riU-
~y
d-k J-fi fl r.L}f
I' 3^7i
!¦ r ' <„ ,r
/;, '•/ ) r» c 4 k€, fiOlr\ "f"
'¦/ /¦' pfX."-6 )_, ^ i4f
I' ' ¦' ¦ ' '! f'
' ; 1 :,.•¦¦¦ -¦ t'). . ¦; ,¦¦¦•¦ .
€ Af J Art sL j f') c k< J
fr "~7 7-''- '- :f- " r,.-;Vr
<¦' :: .. .
... .. :... " I
^a S« / 5,f f--J_
J*,
-------
LITHOLQGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering. Science, & Technology. Inc, PBC
Client Name and Project Name
Location/Boring Name
Sheet
1 of
1 Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
1/11/
8 Date/Time Collected Date/Time Processed
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
6 latitude/Northing/Grid
9 Sed Surface Elevation
10 Coordinate System H
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
3 Operator Name (License # If Required)
7 Longitate/Eastirtg/Grid
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
Sunny/Cloudy/Rain
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic: :: -ft barrel ' -in diameter
Core: _ barrel _____ -
Grab Sample: -t x _
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boring Depth (ft)
¦in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
•ft x -ft Box/Ponar/Van Veen/Other
14 Recovery (ft)
15 % Recovery
16 Location Notes
Description of Materials
Murtseil Color; Moisture; Density, Consistency (Other Remarks)
Interval
(Depth)
Recovery
(ft,i%)
Sample ID PID
Sample Interval (ppm)
uses
Code
C.i3!.rl W-4
...
W-!|k. i-
"\Z~Oo
u,
I o
hYKC (
fovt {jJ\ c/ fe.icf
•)
"Kv.if \t
-------
LITHOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science & fechnologv, Inc PBC
Client Name arid Project Name
C'.Al:-
i h i: id
Location/Bonny Name
/¦'
Sheet
f Of f
1
Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
f . ...
8 Start Date/Time
Stop Date/Time
i
2
Drilling Subcontiactor/Euuipment Operatoi
6 Latitude/Norihing/Gnd
9 Sed Surface Elevation '
"1,9
ft
10 Coordinate System
H fh\i V".
V
U* Vl.Vn"-
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
i
Operator Name (License It If Required)
7 Longitude/Easting/ferid
j. ;
' ;
J
! *
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
¦ ¦ . Sunny/Cloudy/Rasn
4
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
13 Boring Depth (ft)
14 Recovery (ft)
15 % Recovery
Rotosonic: -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: -ft barrel -in diameter Manual Push/Vtbracore
1 1/
X
Grab Sample: 0
-ft X -ft X
0.5 -ft Box'Ponar/Van Veen/Other
16 Location Notes
Other:
' K 1
¦ / ' ¦
Sample Collection Method:
t ' ' ' ¦ i
Interval
(Depth)
Description of Materials
Major Sediment type, cotor, presence o< SAV,'rock/wood, odon'slieen, other inclusions
Sample ID
uses
Code
/
Q S 0 U/
J/] c,(4" tA/i
I /i ., j
Ik
i ii
Other:
s n:\ ,
¦¦ ' A . , j
: *'¦¦¦
^ { „ , *>4-
\(
,1 ?/
-------
LITHO LOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology, Inc, PBC
1 Geologist Name/Signature
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operate*
3 Operator Name (license # If Required)
Client Name and Project Name
5 Project Number
8 latitude/Northing/Grid
7 Longitude/Easting/Grid
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic: , -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: ___ barrel _
Grab Sample: -t x
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
-in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
-ft x -ft Box/Ponar/Van Veen/Other
Location/Boring Name
Sheet
" IL
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8
Date/Time Collected
Date/Time Processed
9
Sect Surface Elevation
ft
10
Coordinate System
H V
11
Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
Sunny/Cloudy/Ram
13 Boring Depth (ft)
14 Recovery (ft)
io-'V
15 % Recovery
18 Location Notes
Interval
(Depth}
Recovery
Description of Materials
Munsell Color; Moisture; Density; Consistency (Other Remarks)
Sample ID PID
Sample Interval (ppm)
uses
Code
1 Ii
J2
Lf
114 jt'V
f|/v
rtt?Q KSui
iiXJL
: ft
il
V
\
S -Ml"
K7 "7 — J
Ll A
/%r/l j
M(P (Mm•
H
B
*7,z> ""
ZL K
21 6 CfiU^
£ A
(Ml
") "| "j " z
29 -I
3'5
n!l "u
-------
B&
UTHOlOGfC LOG
Sedimmt Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology, Inc., PBC
Client Name and Project Name
Location/Boring Name
Sheet
' of
1 Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Dale/Time Collected Date/Time Processed
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
8 latitude/Northing/Grid
9 Sect Surface Elevation
10 Coordinate System
H
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
3 Operator Name (License # If Required)
7 longitude/Eastir»g/Grid
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
Sunny/Cloudy/Rain
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic: _r -ft barrel _ -in diameter
Core: -ft barrel _
Grab Sample: -ft x
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boring Depth (ft)
-in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
-ft x -ft Box/Ponar/Vari Veen/Other
14 Recovery (ft)
/c,/f '
15 % Recovery
18 Location Notes
Interval
(Depth)
Recovery
(ft & %)
Description of Materials
Munsell Color; Moisture; Density: Consistency (Other Remarks)
Sample ID PID
Sample Interval (ppm)
uses
Code
!
WS'n
i iiXlAj L*
ficsiAM (fi i1" \
-------
la
LJTHOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering Science & Technology, Inc. PBC
Client Name and Project Name
i-th( V
k;
Location/Bonng Name
b* - r
Sheet
i of /
1 Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Start Date/Time
Stop Date/Time
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
6 Latitude/Northing/Grid
9 Sed Surface Elevation
10 Coordinate System
H • V NfAWj*
3 Operatoi Name (License # If Required)
Longitude/Easting/Grid
Depth of Water ft (staii/end)
i ¦ r i
12 Weather (Temp, aide conditions wind direction)
"¦ , /Sunny/Cloudy/Rdin
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic: _____ -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: -ft barrel
Grab Sample: -ft x
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boring Depth (ft)
in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
ft x C\t-< -ft Box/Ponar//an Veen/Other
14 Recovery (ft)
15 % Recovery
16 Location Notes
Interval
(Depth)
Description of Materials
Major Sediment lype coior. presence of SAV/rO'.k/wood odor.steen. o!her inciubiorii
Sample ID
uses
Code
Other;
I V
-------
^ UTHOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering. Science, & Technology, Inc., PBC
Client Name and Project Name
Location/Boring Name
111 ' ;
Sheet
of
1 Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Date/Tim# Collected
Date/Time Processed
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
6 Latitude/Northing/Grid
9 Sed Surface Elevation ft
10 Coordinate System H V
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
3 Operator Name (License # If Required)
7 Longitude/Easting/Grid
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
Sunny/Cloudy/Rain
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic: i -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: -I! barrel _____ -in diameter Manual Push/Vibraeore
Grab Sample: ___ -ft x
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boring Depth (ft) 14 Recovery (ft) 15 % Recovery
-ft x -ft Box/Ponar/Van Veen/Other
16 Location Notes
Interval
(Depth)
Recovery
(it & %)
Description of Materials
Munsell Color; Moisture; Density; Consistency (Other Remarks)
Sample ID < PID
Sample Interval , (ppm)
uses
Code
toOi s
Im 'xii'ttl j fit pnd fi'i
, ..
. *L(- OUIq
(Oij?*
irlfl fl
}T\}'
p\"?vF
|i| - |0,
>1 >
(tz" *35
1
¦
3-fa
m,
ft/
J >
yvil/! f £;t
1 in 5jc'Li^i
\Jr; gf7 m\i\~ rom?
-------
tt
H>4 tngmeennq, Science
LITHOtOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
& Technology, Inc.. PBC
Client Name and Piojecl Name
h' •
Location'Boring Name
r 'i : '
Sheet
of 1
Geologist Name/Signature
5 Piojert Numbef
CORE COLLECTION INFO
h%1/prx i?^f/
8 Start Date/Time
Stop Date/Time
2
Drilling SubcontMctoi/Equipmerit Operator
6 Latitude/Northing/Grid
9 Sed Surface Elevation
ft
'»" " t®: ¦
- -
10 Coordinate System
H fe'UK*
V
KtWDbS
'
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
3
Operator Name (License # If Required)
7 Longilude/Easting/Gnd
/ * *"
'.. .... t.. f
, ¦ _ ,1 , L.
' ' { '
12 Weather (Temp circle conditions, wind direction)
Sunny/Cloudy/Ram ' f
4
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
S3 Bonng Depth (ft)
14 Recovery (ft)
15
% Recovery
_
Rotosonic: -ft barrel -in diameter
f
¦r
Core: -ft barrel -in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
X
Grab Sample: 0
-ft X -ft X
0,5 -ft Box'Ponar/yan Veen/Other
16 Location Notes
i
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
Interval
(Depfty
Description of Materials
Major Sediment type, color presence ol 3AV/rockiwooil, Qdor'sheeo. other inclusions
Sample ID
uses
Code
v. : .
!;
"f ?r) U'j / ( C w f—--
cfiifg;
/'/rf' (i*Jf J
] /eft)
Other:
(°4<
{ft % ricc^/f , UJ fr p^sk
cJe^r f £)f /»V« "r^
Jf?^- U J-e& ->
J ,, y *1*'a/Jin V 7°)- 0
f/K-< /, *
-------
M
UTHOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology, Inc., PBC
Client Name and Project Name
Location/Boring Name
Sheet
of I
1 Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Date/Time Collected Date/Time Processed
>; r
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
6 Latifude/Northiiig/Grid
9 Sed Surface Elevation
10 Coordinate System H
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
3 Operator Name (License # If Required)
7 Longitude/Easting/Grid
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
Sunny/Cloudy/Rain
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic: ;. -ft barrel -in diameter
Core; -ft barrel _ -in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
Grab Sample: -ft x -ft x
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boring Depth (ft) 14 Recovery (ft) 15% Recovery
-ft Box/Ponar/Van Veen/Other
18 location Notes
Interval
(Depth}
Recovery
Description of Materials
Munseil Color: Moisiura; Density; Consistency (Other Remarks)
Sample ID PID
Sample Interval (ppm)
uses
Code
VI I I ''\.l
^ l l
IO
3
fk-1 Ca0^i%
(0
1
v4 yAyi.vi ^ (07
Of c
¦ ¦ ¦ ¦¦ \
~>ioyQ
(M~ iz"j
-------
LITHOLOGiC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering. Science & Technology Inc, PBC
Client Name and Project Name
Location/Boring Name
Sheet
1 of y
1 Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Start Date/Time
, i tr, {/,. *
Stop Date/Time
2 Drilling Subcontiaciot'Equipment Operator
6 Laiitude/Norihing/Grici
9 Seel Suiface Elevation
10 Coordinate System
H th'
V
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
3 Operator Name (License # If Required)
J
7 Longitude/Easting/Grid
12 Weather {I emp, circle conditions, wind direction)
¦ ¦ ; Sunny/Cloudy/Ram
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosoriic: -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: -ft barrel
Grab Sample: 0 -ft x
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boring Depth (ft)
¦in diameter Manual PushA/ibracore
•ft x 0.5 -ft Box'Ponar/Van Veen/Other
14 Recovery (ft)
15 % Recovery
16 Location Notes
* -ft,
Interval
(Depth)
Description of Materials
Major Sediment \)oe color presoncb of SA'/'r'jrk.woof etjor^'iecn olhenndu&om.
Sample ID
uses
Code
-/ rlyJU
:
fins.
C_
,l"' I.. ¦
'
J
Other:
ti.
It i
-------
LITH0L0G1C LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology, Inc., PBC
Client Name and Project Name
Location/Boring Name
Sheet
of
1 Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Date/Time Collected Date/Time Processed
-i-
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
6 Latitude/Northing/Grid
9 Sad Surface Elevation
10 Coordinate System
H
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
3 Operator Name (License # If Required)
7 Longitude/Easting/Grid
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
Sunny/Cloudy/Rain
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic: <¦''1 -ft barrel -in diameter
-in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
-ft x -ft x
Other:
Sample Collection Method;
13 Boring Depth (ft)
14 Recovery (ft)
15 % Recovery
a n
/
-ft Box/Ponar/Van Veen/Other
18 Location Notes
interval
(Depth)
Recovery
Description of Materials
Munsell Color; Moisture; Density; Consistency (Other Remarks)
Sample ID PID
Sample Interval (ppm)
uses
Code
TO - HJ- - £
A c.. (i/Uj ^
2l £443^
1© "V
xfi:
/ \
JPf'kt "|Q"'
-------
Jg|P| LITHOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collurhon Log
FA Fuginvonnq Science & technology tnc PBC
Client Name and Project Name
\<' _i
2
Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
6 Latitudu/Northing'tiriri
9 Sed Surface Elevation
ft
MATECO
10 Coordinate System
H 5
V
w*-.
11 Depth of Water, ft {start/end)
3
Operator Name {License # if Required)
7 I ongitude/Easting/Grid
i
'i -
i
12 Weather (Jemp, circle-conditions wind direction)
' ' Sunny/Cioudy/Rain
4
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
13 Boring Depth (ft)
14 Recovery (ft)
15 % Recovery
Rotosonic: -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: -ft barrel -in diameter Manual PushA/ibracore
—i
Grab Sample1 0
Other:
-ft X -ft X
CU'> -ft Box^Ponat/Van Veen/Other
16 Location Notes
f p/I
d
;
Sample Collection Method:
Interval
(Depth}
Description of Materials
Major Sediment type, color, presence of SAVftoeWwwxf, odor/sheen, other inclusions
Sample ID
uses
Code
¦. - •
ft => *v- ||^ 1" ,•* - ^ , :,V^
Other;
-------
m
LITHOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology. Inc., P8C
Client Name and Project Name
Location/Boring Name
1 of f
Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Date/Time Collected
Date/Time Processed
2 Drilling Subcontfactor/EquipmenrOperaJor
6 Latitude/Northing/Gnd
9 Sed Surface Elevation
10 Coordinate System H
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
3 Operator Name (License # If Required)
7 Longitude/Easting/Grid
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
Sunny/Cloudy/Rain
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic: ;A ' -ft barrel ; -in diameter
Core: -ft barrel
Grab Sample: -ft x
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boring Depth (ft)
in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
ft x -ft Box/Ponar/Van Veen/Other
14 Recovery (ft)
15 % Recovery
18 Location Notes
Interval
(Depth)
Recovery
(it&%)
Description of Materials
Munseli Color, Moisture: Density; Consistency (Other Remarks)
Sample ID PID
Sample Interval (ppm)
uses
Code
ju
fl /?! I .
Cxi l r 11
- ri -
- Iri
JL
|ti a
; " "" :• J'.1 -
-------
g|| LITHOLOGJC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
LA Engineeung, Science, & Technology. Inc, PBC
Client Name and Project Name
Location/Boring Name
Sheet
'* of ¦?
i
Geologist Name/Signature
5 Pioject Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
1 i * ^ 1 i
=' ,
8 Start Date/Time
Stop Date/Tim©
2
Dicing Subcontiacton1 Equipment Operator
6 Latitude/Northing/Gnd
9 Sod Surface Elevation -
ft
MAIECO
'< i , ^A v
10 Coordinate System
H
V
(V«A'S
11 Depth of Water ft (start/end)
3
Operator Name {License # If Required)
7 Longitude/Easting/Gnd
" ' \ir -1 i < f '
12 Weather (Temp circle conditions wind direction^
¦¦'Sunny/Cloudy/Rain
4
Sampling Equinment and Methodology (Check One)
13 Boung Depth (ft)
14 Recovery (fti
15
% Recovery
Rotosonic -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: -ft barrel -in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
fi
r
Grab Sample: 0
-ft X -ft X
•' 1 -ft Box'Ponar/Van Veen/Other
16 Location Motes
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
Interval
(Depth)
Description of Ma to rials
Major Sed'ment typ° color r"«°nr« n< SAV-tirt now) udor slitei' nrhsr illusions
Sample ID
uses
Code
1/&*
I 1 ^
i M \v(A i ^
1 \ V\r\ \ 5(
\3 *Y 1 ) H/J
, . " *,
**1 C^Db\J.y
\ i^/fjuct €(], boV
,Vv..-"\ D
y\ pt'2-ill j
'~\\\ -
'm'*
Other:
-------
B§
LITHOLOGtC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology, Inc., PBC
Client Name and Project Name
Location/Boring Name
Sheet
of 1
1 Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
wmimi
8 Date/Time Collected
IT
Date,Tims Processed
. i - , .
it) JU"v
6 Latitude/Northing/Grid
9 Sed Surface Elevation
10 Coordinate System H
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
3 Operator Name (License if If Required)
7 Longitude/Easting/Grid
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
Sunny/Cloudy/Rain
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic: . : -ft barrel ,
Core: _ -ft barrel
Grab Sample: -ft x
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boring Depth (ft)
n diameter Manual Pushft/ibracore
I x -ft Box/PonarA/an Veen/Other
14 Recovery (ft)
15 % Recovery
18 Location Notes
Interval
(Depth)
Recovery
Description of Materials
Munsell Color; Moisture: Density; Consistency (Other Remarks)
Sample ID ' P1D
Sample Interval (ppm)
uses
Code
sf ^t(U| f;
(Jlficf 'tm €4 U fi w iii
Jus
t)
U*.
-------
1ft
L.ITHOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science £ Technology, !nc, PBC
Client Name and Project Name
rbcnd
Location/Boring Name
, » •
Sheel
i of 1
1 Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Start Date/Time
Stop Date/Time
/
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
6 Laiitude/Northing/Gnd
Sed Surface Elevation
10 Coordinate System
H V UA'-'Ufih
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
3 Operator Name (License # If Required)
i
,¦¦¦ -¦¦¦ ( ¦* ¦ . ./
7 Longitude/Ea&iing/Gnd
12 Weather (Temp, circle, conditions wind direction)
Skinny/Cloudy/Ram
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic: _ -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: -ft barrel
Grab Sample; 0 -ft x
Other-
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boring Depth (ft)
¦in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
ft x 0Z -ft Box'Ponar//an Veen/Other
14 Recoveiy (ft)
15 % Recovery
16 Location Notes , # /
hcn juSkA 4^
r'-ty p ^
ne/1 1'l€ Wwv£
Interval
(Depth)
Description of Materials
Maior Sediment type color presence o!-iAV/rock'wood ociof'sheen olliei inclusions
Sample ID
uses
Code
m o
... , , T ... f. , ..
4¦rx.j.y f 3 Or.i/rl 4(fi,%A
Other;
10 7. i I"' 5 f"'"f
j.? .' I f , >.t f-1 yi'f'O
j-/!)', } '"**' ,-V"i I
{4 /?(/-) A j tO, S fJ ( 0/f\>
y\prjl\ >>*) tf,/| If Ij i-f. 5
$ :l '"IS ,
k JL. Uv^^'n y /V|/"i f-f
-------
-------
LITHOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology, Inc., PBC
Ghent Name and Project Name
Oi a;
'.1
location/Boring Name
* , ' -1
U V , 1 ' v'_
Sheet
1 of 1
1
Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
1
... .Vl, ..
8 Start Date/Time
Stop Date/Time
, If-, • ,
* * * ' M '
/" 'J
¦t '
'I .-5 c
Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
6 Latitude/Northing/Grid
9 Sed Surface Elevation
ft
tVivr-X'
V fj f i
10 Coordinate System
H .NM
V
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
3
Operator Name {License # If Required)
7 Longitude/E£ast i ,
iSunny/Cloudy/Rain
4
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
13 Boung Depth (ft)
14 Recovery (ft)
15 % Recovery
Rotosonic: -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: -ft barrel -in diameter Manual PushA/ibracore
,<
Grab Sample: Si
-ft X -ft X
0,¦;> -ft Box'Ponar/7an Veen/Other
16 Location Notes
Other.
- > 1
'
t v
: '
Sample Collection Method:
Interval
(Depth)
Description of Materials
Maior Sediment type coioi, presence ul SAV/rocVwood. ud»sheen other inclusions
Sample ID
uses
Code
?!as
Otlior:
Jl. <¦ i Mch h>
115 ii4#lk^t/«.4 r&t„JU far'*-\tp*A
\0 i::f i?'i.X.t+(i>
7
M
-------
urHouy-i, in<;
jc'l-pvn' i oik i iio.) I ug
E^ Enutip ij'na ^rt^nc,-. f T< rhi oit< iject Name
Pjpjw f f iumitrt
V> L it'tjt'clJcithing (
7 Longitude/Easting/Grid
i ocrJtin'-'Bunng Name
Sheet
of f
CORK COLLECTION INFO
8 Start Date/Time
Stop Date/'! ime
f Y
9 iit'i iMiitacfc btL/atior
^~oriMnatte Sy ->tem
11 P 'OTh m Wdte*- ft { f*rtLnd»
Wi dthc iTl m,j c rcL ^onrNtton-- ampo riir\.eiinn>
vU'niiv C'Oudv F-jin
4 Sampling Equioment and Muthoclolotjv iTheck One* 13 Bonne, Denth tfti
Rotosomc -ft barrel -in diameter
Core „ -ft barrel -in diameter Manual PusWVibracore
Grab Sample: -ft x -ft x -ft BcWPonar/Van Veen/Other |16 tocat,or! Ho,es
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
n,_cGvtJty / Hi
1 h ' I Ru-fV'f ry
Interval
,l spnfh I
Recovery
(tti. %'•
1
1 { J
Oescriptfon ot Materials
M'jttL-5' Cck-r ftn ly
-------
LITHOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology Inc . PBC
Client Name and Project Name
Location'Bormg Name
Sheet
of 1
Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
Start Date/Time
I 1 1 I. • o
1 5 j
Stop Date/Time
' ( ( f \ ^ -
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
S Latitude/Nofthing/Grid
9 Sed Surface Elevation * * '
HArr' • i
10 Coordinate System H NAiV- V
11 Depth of Water ft (start/end)
3 Operator Name (License # If Reqwied)
T - ? i* - I
7 Longitude/Eastmg/Gnd
12 Weather ('temp circle conditions,, wind direction)
, .* .< ; Sunny/Cloudy'Ham
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic: -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: _ -ft barrel _
0 -ft x
13 Boring Depth (ft)
' T i t
Grab Sample:
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
-in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
-ft x 1'-ft Box'Ponar/Van Veen/Other
14 Recovery (It)
• l/U,
15 % Recovery
18 Location Notes
Interval
(Depth)
Description of Materials
Major Sediment type, color present* ol SAV 'locktod odor "sheen other inclusions
Sample ID
uses
Code
if '•
i' i i!
;4 k
,i >>
A,;
in##*-- *-"^r
i'/'v \ :
4M
Other:
J£ £ is ib J 3, L) ir
/J Jo
#0+" <4. tX -ri- ^ i-*'«2
llM-0
ri~ vlij -reeM'y"-
'£^dir,r nnnrvij
/3(9C r<^ <*• ^
no rrAfL«| Jlfqg, ,K O-
-d .Wr» n 5 / S*. H -Pi'
d-6< 6 £{-
h' lA'} ^" '*' i , AX /« f f *C f j e IJ
•7 ""?/< .
<•••>*/ f,! j I S. (**.6'P/r)
/3i'ts jit J.' '/, jiffij i'AmJr
•/# Iffii ^'V^A-t/eretfi h,*>*A i.*
-------
lift
U FHOtOGIC LOG
St'dtmvnt CoHtriAion I og
h>\ t.nii>n<-&rtfUi r>avfico -S. ]pchna10 i t lio >tt( a
liu Lr,oci uitt »,-tern H
of Adit-i n sGtert/endi
/ Longitude/Easting/Grid
I 12 "'Cc^t^o! Temp CM clr I OptU'Gfti, V'lfl f 1" O* iiO"P
sunnv Oou>w Run
4 Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic -ft barrel -in diameter
Core ft barrel -in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
Grab Sample: -ft x
Other
Sample collection Method.
Inteival Recovery
iDi.pm) in- L~. :„I
-ft x -tt Box/Ponar/Van Ve .'./Other
U
3-U
, . i :
H,
\i \f u
CtfC
i K11,o,ir,
Description of Materials
tuf,"t il:1 i M.< , 1 f t...>tT v ' C^t-nV nd^Si
Sample ID P1D
Sample Interval (ppm)
uses
Cod c
I- (ft ¦ £V(1ft*ft I
SH , PPWJ -c
tviqrxi fc> kwKtof} IH.
\x
vt <&)&$) - (xw icb-f) ^iq
-------
Ill
LITHOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
£A Engineering Science, & Technology. Inc., PBC
Client Name and Piujecf Name
Location/Boring Name
i' ' ' . !
Sheet
t of •
1 Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
Start Date/Time
Stop Date/Time
/'¦
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
6 Latitude/Nfarthifig'Grid
9 Sed Surface Elevation
to Coordinate System H N.Au.i.; V NAVO.1t!
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
3 Operator Name (License # If Required)
7 Longituda/Eastinji/Grid
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
Sunny/Cloudy/Rain
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic: -ft barrel -in diameter
Core, -ft barrel
Grab Sample si -ft x
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boring Depth (ft)
¦in diameter Manual PushA/ibracore
ft x •: -ft Box'Ponar/'/an Veen/Other
14 Recovery (ft)
15 % Recovery
16 Location Notes
Interval
(Depth)
Description of Materials
Mapr Sediment type color, presence of SAV/rodcwood odor-shewn, other inclusions
Sample ID
uses
Code
Other:
/Aulv 4c ^ L'€.f\ 4~e It'
i (P- %}
-li-
i .i ; t r . i ¦
nmnu,i,s f
I ( J g,(;> ff ttel
-------
LITB0L061C LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology, Inc., PBC
Client Name and Project Name
Location/Boring Name
Sheet
1 of f
1 Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Date/Time Collected
X
Date/Time Processed
2 Drilling Subcontract®/Equipment Operator'
8 Latitude/Northing/Grid
9 Sed Surface Elevation
10 Coordinate System H
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
3 Operator Name (License # If Required)
7 tongitude/Eastirig/Grid
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
Sunny/Cloudy/Rain
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic: _____ -ft barrel "< -in diameter
Core: ______ -ft barrel
Grab Sample: -ft x
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boring Depth (ft)
in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
¦ft x -ft Box/PonarA/an Veen/Other
14 Recovery (ft)
15 % Recovery
16 Location Notes
interval
(Depth)
Recovery
Description of Materials
Munsell Color, Moisture; Density; Consistency (Other Remarks)
Sample ID
Sample Interval
PID
(Ppm)
uses
Code
ami ij4 c
yAkj cMij
/ i
iViA/f
1&5" '21-10 2
o
; I
4
Lfc
-------
LITHOLOGiC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering. Science, & Technology- Inc.. PBC
Client Name and Project Name
Location/Boring Name
Sheet
1 of
f Geologist Name/Signature
5 Protect Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
Start Date/Time
Stop Date/Time
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
6 latitude/Northing/God
9 Sed Surface Elovation
10 Coordinate System
11 Depth of Water, ft (stait'end)
3 Operator Name (License # If Required)
.' I : - ' fc
7 Long itudo/Ea stmg/Grid
12 Weather (Temp, circto condition;,, wind direction)
SunnyCloudy/Rain
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic: -ft barrel -m diameter
Core: -ft barrel
Grab Sample: fl -ft x
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
13 Bonng Depth (ft)
in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
ft x o -ft Box/Ponar/7an Veen/Other
I4 RecovKiy (fl)
*» 'tit#*
15 % Rocovf ry
16 Location Notes
Interval
{Depth)
Description of Materials
Mapr Sediment type color presence of SAVrocktaopci odor.'sheen, other inclusions
Sample ID
uses
Code
.)
Other:
f*** <*,S f4", aMtd (stUy, lx
It<¦.cA <*-*¦/" 'f -f-1", f£i /« j-
J-"'*
i*A> it I)- i ^ l!" # ,, * j j, ,-7 I o
r *. . < ?
-------
-------
m
UTHOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science. & Technology, Inc PBC
Client Name and fiojecl Name
Location/Boring Nam«
Sheet
1 of 1
1 Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project Number
j «' •>
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Start Date/Time
J't (J
Stop DatofTime
Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
b Latitude/Northing/Gnd
9 Sed Surface Elevation
10 Coordinate System H V ,\'AV02S
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
3 Operator Name (License # It Required)
7 Longituda/Easting/Gnd
12 Weathei (Temp, uitults conditions wind direction)
, , - Sunny/Cloudy'Rain
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic: -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: -ft barrel
Grab Sample: 1; -ftx
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boring Depth (ft)
in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
ftx OS -ft Box'Ponar/Van Veen/Other
14 Recovery (ft)
15 % Recovery
16 Location Notes
interval
(Depth)
Description of Materials
Maior Sediment type, color, presence of SAV>rock'»ood udarsheen other inclusion
Sample ID
It P
uses
Code
Other:
-------
-------
LI'IHOLOCICLOC
Sfiiimenl Co/frcfto/i I op
ri rnrjinocuna Scenes & TV-otwiofow Int PtSC
Client Name and Project Name
Lorjtiun Bo'ifiti N cnc ^ AbcU
! GcoIotsi Name/Sign,ituit
5 ProjuJ Nur"bt-i
>ORk COLLbCflUN INhO
? fullinj
1 1 '¦ ' :'7
Start D.ne/hme
Stop Duti./Timc
kibf unt'dclo' 'Eqmptiv
nt Operator
6 l ti tude 'N o 1m n g/G < id
9 Sed Surface Elevation ft
H i oat jin.ut bvWff H * w ' k
11 Hcpth of r ft t^Urt/endi
3 Qi
*
7 Longitude/Easting/Grid
12 Wyathe1 (Temp > urir crnn^oni \ind d'lt-cnum
Sunny Oouoy hdirt
4
Sampling) f:(|iiipnie-nt and Methodology n'.neck One)
Rotosonic, j. -ft barrel -in diameter
Core. -ft bariel -in diameter Manual Push/Vibracote
Grab Sample -ftx -fix -ft BcWPopcir 'Van Veen Othe,
Other:
Sample Collection Method
13 honnu L'tplh (jl)
u p
rovcrv {to
overy
16 Location Notes
Interval
(Depth)
Recovery
(ft & %)
Description ot Material;, Sample ID Pir»
fclnrt-il ><>i Vu^'uf 1/ • * ,i ii'h'ii-if Sample Interval tppnti
uses
Co <*¦
/
\
\
\
\
\ , , „
i i 11 ¦« 1 i ' v, : -1 ^ ft .» i i v f \> u '
' 1
: "A.-..
i .
i ft
^ ^x if L
~
j ^ 1 " f , ' ' 1 '* 1 ! ' t t ' ( { - ( . ^
' i (i'' ¦,l'
a^ (Y~Zaik fi§%(flh'h/f <¦>£? Pi-'*
' s I • . 5 - > < ' i i ;1
-------
LI fHOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Enoinecanq Science & Technology, Inc.. PBC
Client Name and Project Name
glaes
Location/Boring Name-
r t1 •
Sheet
< of ?
1 Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Start Date/Time
Stop Date/Time
2 Dulling Subcontiactoi/Equspment Operator
6 Latitude/Northiny/Gnd
9 Sed Surface Elevation
3 Operator Name (License # If Required)
Longitude/tasting/Giid
10 Coordinate System H oin,} •,
v ;
/' \ 08'?>*.{ f J J,
i* <*"'*<£ /-'I /W' s»l *-*<.>•<¦*4, ^ " 7 »' A (t,*Jt-C TA'
I# hl,J. fl
" ' <%)
-------
-------
B£J% L1THOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering. Science. & Technology, inc, PBC
Client Name and project Name
GLAES
Hjvert-i-'iKi
Locatfon/Sormg Name
1^7 ^77
Sheet
of 1
1
Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project Number
GORE COLLECTION INFO
Mr
\
625S125
3 Start Date/Time
n >1
Stop Date/Time
2
Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
jS*
6 Latitude/j^ortbing/Gnd
9 Sed Surface Elevation
£" -T cf <--7
I> /
ft
MA i ECO
^ Oi r* 1. —? "2 o
10 Coordinate System
H NAD83
V
NAVD3«
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
3
Operator Name (License # If Required)
7 LongitudefEasting/ferid
"•! c / / 4
7 > . L1
** L. J ,
j J "•<-} y
. 3 H( -> 7
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
C'} £ " p" {§unny/C1oudy/Rain _ -
4
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Cjieck One)
13 Boring Depth (ft)
14 Recovery (ft)
15
% Recovery
Rotosonici -ft barrel -in diameter
\o
IP
0 '7
Core: -ft barrel -in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
f
f
X
Grab Sample' 0
-ft X -ft x
O.S -ft Box/jPonar/Van Veen/Other
18 Location Notes
r1
Other:
s;'j|
.... . s
Sample Collection Method:
interval
(Depth)
Description of Materials
Major Sedirrent lyoe, ccior. presence of SAVrocJuwcod odor/sheen, olhe<" inch 'sions
Sample !D
uses
Code
f < v »•>, i*-l f?15
S S.
\ I - ¦
G'at S'HV"-
U j
i 0 i v n *
j v..
r.<., >h'
/-it ,\C„ i"1' - 1 -J! •*"*' " '
-} • *{«'• J. * "r . t "-*7','. * r V ' * / •£ V ^ * " ' * '
Other:
-------
m
LITHOLOGIC LOG
Sadiment Collection Log
EA Engineering. Science, & Technology, Inc., PBC
Client Name and Project Name
Location/Boring Name
Sheet
1 of
1 Geologist Name/Signature
111, Geltnas
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Date/Time Collected
Date/Time Processed
2 Drilling sudcotitractor/tquipment Operator
6 Latitude/Northing/Grid
6 Sed Surface Elevation
10 Coordinate System
H
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
3 Operator Name (License # If Required)
7 Longitude/Easting/Grid
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
Sunny/Cloudy/Rain
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic: ¦ -ft barrel -in diameter
-ft barrel _ -in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
-ft x -ft Box/Ponar/Van Veen/Other
13 Boring Depth (ft) 14 Recovery (ft) 15% Recovery
Core:
Grab Sample:
Other:
-fix
18 Location Notes
Sample Collection Method:
Interval
(Depth)
Recovery
Description of Materials
Mynsell Color; Moisture; Density: Consistency (Other Remarks)
Sample ID
Sample Interval
PID
(ppm)
uses
Code
_£OJ£
V Gw
Ul |
-------
LITHOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering Science & Technology Inc PRC
Client Ncjme and Pioject Name
GLAES
Location'Bonng Name
Sheet
I of
1 Geologist Name/Signatuie
Project Nurnbei
t>.I.".'
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Start Date/Time
Stop Date/Time
7 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
6 Latitud^/Northing/6rid
9 Sed Surface Elevation
10 Coordinate System
H MA:
3 Operator Name (License # If Required)
Longrtucle/Eastin^/Grid
11 Depth of Water, ft (startrend)
. "> ;
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
, Sunny/Cloudy/Rain
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosomc: -ft barrel -in diameter
Core: -ft barrel
Grab Sample: 0 -ft x
Other.
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boring Depth (ft)
-in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
-ft x (5.5 -ft Box'Ponar/Van Veen/Other
14 Recovery (ft)
15 % Recovery
16 Location Notes
Interval
(Depth)
Description of Materials
Maior Sediment type, color, presence of SAV/tocS 'wood odor'sheen otlw ipiJit ions
Sample ID
uses
Code
Other:
5' ¦))-. -f-i Mvfe ekv^- •'''
rZi, fi d"ok Jr
# / /
) ^ if;) IWx-f—^c c S
/i:+' A->-er wc-f^X. ^
-------
jgy% ' LITHOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Enqtnptinpq Science & Technology inc PBC
Client Name and Project Name
Location/Bonrig Name
Sheet
Of
Geologist Name'Signatuie
1
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
V / : ; • '
J_1 L_i_
0 Start Date/Time
«. '
| >IX
Stop Datu/Time
2
Drilling Subcontiactoi.Equipment Optraloi
b Latitude/Northmg/G.Kj
9 St-cl 3yface Elevation
ft
MAT6C.
•
10 Coordmatte System
H NAD83
\
11 Depth of Water, ft
Dtart/end)
3
Operator Name iLicense- # If Required!
Longitude/Eashng/Grid
12 Weather {Temp, circle conditions wind direction)
Surmy/Cloudy/Rain
A
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
13 Boring Depth (ft)
14 Recovery (ft)
15
% Recovery
Rotosonic -ft barrel -in diameter , .
\
X
Core:
-ft barrel , -in diameter Manual PushMhfacore
0
t
Grab Sample
-ft X -ft X
• s,
-ft Box/Ponar/Van Veen/Other
16 Location Notes
Other,
Sampl
5 Collection Methc
>d:
interval
{Depth1
Recovery
Description of Materials
MunGrH loiQf ',101-ti.rn t>n \ ^ n Ot'rvr Memarksi
Sample ID
Sample Interval
PID
(ppm)
uses
Code
"S."
I
j ^
j
/
2
i »-. i • ! 1
* I \
'A ; ' t ; t 1 j 1 >.M-vu |( •
t v- I
* ¦ , 1
2S\^-Z ~
- JI ->
d- [
3ll
w i
! J ,
i i
1 ^ | !_ s , * - * '
\
• fir ]
J nkJ /
V £
U C 1 ¦ c |f (J
, - * 11
' ' !
i i
1 ' 1
,•'j*,.. * » '*.»
At . ' » ' A
>! ® ir-i..
" yi
s
i
¥-:BV
* *
\
i
i
^ /'*i C f ") i C'
%< f I . , #/1* r? X A y'XJAjJV
::: i **¦- ' ""
r
*
lcl
Pfr%^
— .lIii
; . /
* ih \
t
• 1 , ! 1
•<. \ i * v'v y ; \1n 1, ^ (t, ; ' ^ J \
% > k,
co%
,
t
I. ——XaJ.
i 1 "f / i 1" . '
1
.I "
31]
"O" / >1 t iv t J.' j i >
p • \ " 1 1 '
JT
i
\, ;•
ii J
±4—Li_^J l_l_l 1 ¦ . \
ji.
, IS '"\
! i i •
i''i> ^
•\ 1 , i> ,
j. f 1 ,
5 H**"
v{ i •• f ) ¦. > 1 !<¦ *' (,• •<\> f
!
/
-------
!®l
I ITHOLOGK LOG
Sediment Collection L og
£A Science A Technology far PrC
1 Geologist Name/Signature
A i"i ' .. .1 ,
' ' ¦> ' i, f
L./£,
• M
2 Drilling Stibcont!dctcsv£quiuni6nt Operjtor
3 Operator Name iLtionse # If Requited)
Client M-)irx? ,md Project Name
5 Project Number
6 LaliluUe/Northing'Grid
7 longitude* tasting Grid
Sampling Equipment and Methodology {Check One)
Rotosonic: ______ -ft barrel _____ -in diameter
> 1 ,U
Core: kO -ft barrel -in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
-ft x -ft Box/Ponar/Van Veen/Other
lO -ft barrel
Grab Sample; -ft x
Other:
Sample Collection Method: i
""IV.
Location'Buring Name
r , ) u> ° " '7
CORE COLLECTION INFO
E
Sheet
* z
8 Start Date/Time
Stop Date/Time
9 Sed Suiface Elevat'on
10 Cooidinate System H
V <
11 Depth of Watei, ft (start/end)
12 Weather (Temp circle conditions wind direction i
Sunnv/Cloudv/Ram
13 Boring Depth (ft) 14 Recovery (ft) 15% Recovery
18 Location Notes
Interval
(Depth)
V f
Recovery
(ft& %!
1
vn 'A.'s
I.1 i
- - { » . S
h: j •
Description of Materials
MnnstJI (Vibr V!c,stur= Orsil/ ' msi-Vi v 'ttv-r Pi marks'
Sample ID PID
Sample Interval (pom)
10*1 "\f\~i4 K0M
i! f '
v * /, f ¦';> \
f V *
I > ^ I V. ^ (
"R
1 * '
A1OI LL
1 V
I'X -s';,v. Kn
* )
a
J
uses
Code
-------
ill
LITHOLOGIC LUG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering. Science & Technology Inc PBC
Client Name and Project Name
Locdtion/Boring Name
i ¦ ' '
Sheet
1 of
Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project Numbei
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Start Date/Time
Stop Date/Time
/- var*
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
MA » L(.tv
6 Lalitude/Norihing/Gnd
y. Sed Surface Elevation
3 Operator Name iLicense # if Required)
7 Longitude/Easting/Gnd
3 i
10 Coordinate System H ^<"u-is
V
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
12 Weather <7emp circle conditions wind dnei-liUM)
6unny/fcloudy/Ram
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic -ft barrel -in diameter
Core. -ft barrel
Grab Sample " -ft x
Other;
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boring Depth (ft)
-in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
ft x .< .i -ft Box/Ponar/Jan Veen/Other
14 Recovery (ft)
15 '-'n Recoveiy
16 Location Notes
J
Interval
(Depth)
Description of Materials
Major Sediment type, color, presence of SAV/rofk.'wood, odor/sheen, other inclusions
Sample ID
uses
Code
Other:
HyV 5 7% I 1 thgif'K £-tf+ d,u^ «|£»
^ (j £4- it
A» t ,/i a, H e it ^ ¦<*'
-------
Li I HOLOGiC LOG
Sediment Collection I og
EA Engineering Science & Technology Inc PBC
Client hanv and Project Name
Loration/Boung Name
Sheet
1 of 1
1 Geologist Narpt^S'gnaturc
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
fl Start Date/Timr?
Dnlhng Subcontractor'fciquipmttnt'Operator
m\r\
Stop DateiTime
6 Latitude/Northing/Gnd
9 Scd Surface tlsvation
10 Coordinate System M tAi ,.A V w AN11 ¦;»'!
1i Depth of Watei fl (start'end)
3 Opei ator Name (license # If Required)
7 Longitude/Easting/Grid
12 Weather ilemp circle condition!, wind direction)
Sunny'CSoudy/Rsin
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One!
Rotosonic: -fl barrel -in diameter
Core: -ft barrel
Grab Sample' -ftx
Other:
Sample Collection Method;
13 Boring Depth (ft) !4 Recovery (ft) 15% Recovery
in diameter Manual Pusfj/Vibfocoie
-ft x
Box/PonarA/an Veen/Other
16 Location Notes
Interval
SDepthi
Recovery
(((&%)
Description of Materials Sample ID PID
Murw«lk,clw VJobturs Jsnoih Ajn=-iaeni.s u>h -smarts) Sample interval (pom)
uses
Coos
c •
U,.\, \ ?!
- ...... ;
\
\
i " i« • *
V 'o 1 "• , \ •l"1 5 •' '• >;< ' i
. ¦ a'
^ v * *
,i ^ * (.
i
!i i >" ¦,
' ^ / , >. A > ; ' 1 , J
f ' t
; r *1
i t \ i
V • 1 A
!
V ' \ ZX ;* - i' - r!-, ¦ •-
i • ,
V »
-------
6
WW
£4 Engineering Science
UTHGLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
& Tochnoloay. inc., PBC
Client Name and Project Name
,a,
Location/Boring Name
1
Sheet
of 1
1
Geologist Ndme/Signature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
K \a - ^ P* ~
" * >
8 Start Date/Time
Stop Date/Time
/
f 1;/ D
2
Dniling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
6 Latitude/Northing/Gnd
9 Seel Surface Elevation
fc *(*
ft
WA-.hCC
,
10 Coordinate System
H
V
;s'A-/i ;->v
11 Depth of Water, ft (stast/end)
3
Operator Name (License # If Required)
7 Longttude/£asting/Gnd
i ''
i "
C
12 Weather Hemp urcle conditions wind dnectiun)
' » Sunny'Ciouciy/Rain )
4
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic. -ft barrel -in diameter
13 Boung Depth (ft)
14 Recovery (ft)
15
"0 Recovery
Core: -ft barrel -in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
'
X
Grab Sample: <¦.
-ft X -ft X
(>- -i" -ft Box'Ponar/Van Veen/Other
16 location Notes
—
Other:
Sample Collection Wiethe
>d:
Interval
(Depth)
Description of Materials
Maior Sediment type, color, pteserife of SAV.'roi-k'wooc! odor/sheen other inclusions
Sample ID
uses
Code
V /.V; hf~
"T~ i-v 1 y
Other:
ii"?
! o m S
i'W
j/tipm
it
* ^
jS.^T j-f s"t
i s"
t"? Iv h',.*J I f •'">
r^+ - -. * *v*A ^
\j,ft,X rcfi^K^i *'¦ i)hT s-b !(? f4~,
- , '/ _ -Jrn r ..
^ k, yi <4f f' > - a * ^ ^ i /y-'t >.
-4.
t't1
^ r ' ' '' " l- * ' \J0 s g
At1 - i ^ j~Ut ( s-M-i f-tvs
-------
LI THOIOGIC LOG
Segment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science & Technology Inc PBC
Client IJa'iK and nrojtct Name
Location/Boring Name
'ohetit
1 of 1
1 Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project Number
CORL COLLECTION INFO
Irf
j
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Opeiatoi
.li\' ->
a start Date/rime-i.rj
^top-Bat«ITinuj f1,
6 Latitude/Northirig'Grid
9 Sc-cl Surface Elevation
10 Cooidinate System H MAD83 v
11 Dspth of Water ft (start/and 1
3 Operator Name (License # If RequiredI
7 Longitude/Easting/Grici
12 Weather {Temp, circle conditions wind direction)
Surmy/Ctoudy.'Ram
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic -ft barrel -in diameter
Core.
Grab Sample -ft x ____ -ft x
Other:
13 Boring Depth {ft) 14 Recovery (ft) 15 % Recovery
;*) -ft barrel
-ft X
in diameter Manual Pusfi/Vibrtjcore
-ft Box/Ponar-'Van Veen/Other
!b Location Notes
Sample Collection Method:
Interval
(Depth)
Recovery
(ft & %!
Description of Materials Sample ID PID
Munrell Color Uuislu.f On*.!!/ fncis^n-v (fnht-r Rwarks; Sample Interval (ppm)
uses
9
"¦ ¦ {>
' 1 * , ' "... , *>* ¦' 1
I 1 i
1 ' ^ "' 1
' .H-'f ' I ^ • >. >•' ! 1 , I.. ,
I ' ^ ,
\f{< r',\i
n i ¦„ »• i 1 ,i
, j i~T> • ¦ 1 —
s ff i J"; t s*f
—J—1: ' ¦W i_. nil \i".\ it v ¦, 1
''V^ ^^ ^
)i K?" 1
* , 1 *
;i*. i->
11 ;
u'v ,:n
Jl^Ak»'M V . "V "W
* (
tA in /\>\ 1C 1 ^ 1
' J x~ '5 ' "* * V \ i ' .V > I "•
j • l»v * » »
ij i ) I 1
' 1 *'i " v, t ;• \A ; \ D VV
'
' ' ' ' h
. \ S | , V ' - 1,1 ' ' ^ \ s ' \ \
I
^ ^ * Ol ,,1 ^ \ * 1 >, J'" j 11 r ' 1 1 \
-------
LITHOIQGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science & Technology !nc , PBC
Ghent Name and Project Name
Locdtiori/Bonng Name
Sheef
i of 1
1 Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Start Date/Time
Stop Date/Time
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
MATECO
8 Latitude'Northing'Gnd
9 Sed Surface fe-«evat>on
10 Cooidinate System
fi '\.\i
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
3 Operator Name (License # If Required)
7 Longrtude/Easting/Grid
12 Weather {Temp, uncle conditions, wind direction)
Sunny/Cloudy/Rain
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic: -ft barrel -in diameter
Core, -ft barrel -in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
Grab Sample: 0 -ft x
Other;
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boring Depth (tt) 14 Recovery (ft) 15% Recovery
-ft x ¦ -ft Box'Ponar/Van Veen/Other
16 Location Notes
Interval
(Depth)
Description of Materials
Major Sediment type, color, presence of SAV/rociwood odnr ' " : if
y.'1-"- Fr'"'
<7# f< y
-------
m
UTHOLQGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Enqineennq, Science, <£ Technology Inc PRC
Client Name and Project Name
- ,_A»
Location/Boring Name
Sheet
! of '
1 Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Start Date/Time
Stop Date/Time
• /!
Drilling Subrontractoi/Equipment CSperatoi
G Latitude/Noilhing^rid
9 Seel Surface Elevation
10 Coordinate System
H NAD:;-' V H-v/tva
3 Operator Name (License # If Required)
Longitude/Bastirig/Gnd
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
¦ • , 1 Sunny/Ctoudy/Ram
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic: -ft barrel _____ -in diameter
Core: -ft barrel
Grab Sample; -ft x
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boring Depth (ft)
in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
ft x O.ii -ft Box''Ponar/7an Veen/Other
14 Recovery (ft)
15 % Recovery
16 I ocation Notes
Interval
(Depth)
Description of Materials
Major Sediment type, color, presence of SAVtockiwood odor.sheen, other inclusions
Sample ID
uses
Code
1^:4 k
/V/f'
Other:
T 7
fi-
W,
/ •-_! ¦
/1
\(> H-
' 1 ' h-'-r i (
( *'\ ('
I •/ / t/
J fi*
cL--yj l-\
S%
/' »'t"'? J" 4* ^ }
«, ,»i.
*7
,<**• FvV {JeA ¦- -*"1 f'
"V
V J? t
i/r > s i'_ * **
:i.A.5 )
fix, t 'heJ <.'J~ jh, •; I,.,.,
~th(f. tf,T( s'V-'i't £*y(f ^
I J1 fv.v;-^ (¦¦ZiPtr)
-------
UTH010G1C LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science, & Technology, Inc., PBC
Client Name and Project Name
Location/Boring Name
Sheet
1 of f
1 Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
f/il5
8 Date/Time Collected
Date/Time Processed
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator: >'
6 Latitude/Northing/Gnd
i Seel Surface Elevation
10 Coordinate System H
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
3 Operator Name (License # If Required)
7 Longitude/Easting/Grid
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
Sunriy/Cloudy/Rain
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic: ¦ -ft barrel ___
Core; -ft barrel -in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
Grab Sample: -I! x -ft x
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boring Depth (ft)
14 Recovery (ft)
15 % Recovery
-ft Box/PonarA/art Veen/Other
16 Location Notes
Interval
(Depth)
Recovery
(ft&%)
Description of Materials
Munsell Color; Moisture: Density; Consistency (Other Remarks)
Sample ID PID
Sample Interval (Ppm)
uses
Code
min¥\
I" |
:)
t! ,
i ¦'
(it ~ 3
r)
r
c
Jr) rCil
")
1 £
-------
E»
L1THOLOGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering, Science £ technology inc, PRC
Client Name and Project Name
Location/Boring Name
Sheet
ot /
l Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project Number
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Start Date/Time
' 'II.,-
Stop Date/Time
, | ,
9 Sed Surface Flevation
>5Xr V (¦>>.'
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/t-nd;
hi/' f "l S--4-
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Opeiatoi
6 Latitude/Northing/Grid
3 Operator Name (License # If Required)
7 Longitude/Easting/CSrid
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions wind direction)
so Sunny/fjloudylRain
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
Rotosonic -ft bairel -in diameter
Core -ft barrel
Grab Sample: o ft
Other;
Sample Collection Method:
13 Boring Depth (ft)
'//
in diameter Manual PusliA/ibracore
ft x 0 -ft Box'Ponar/Van Veen/Othei
14 Recoveiy fftj
15 % Recovery
16 Location Notes . , t
Interval
(Depth)
Description of Materials
Map GodmieiS type, color, oresence of SAV/'rockiwood, odorteheeri, other inclusions
Sample ID
uses
Code
"j^n/cU tv.'rA /(+f fr
¦' ¦¦ 1 ¦ '<¦ ' ¦ i. v ' . /,, ,..... , ,
'jiv k^t Ory-^.'c,
¦¦ ¦ '¦ 'V.y. , .. ; - V < / ;
13J_< J-¦W\ :¦ rV- r. 1 , i
ft'*? (A/'.'J'Vf „» ii'jt f' i
*>'- 'rtr- fe„vT" c?f )e-T\;
I J"~n, p,:>nixr"" J>f*f 5 (>/•..<.r
1fcf?
£-4 i ¦ , ' - . . ¦ ¦ ¦ '
Other;
J-
JL'
.¦ •" A < ¦ . • " ,. 1 , ¦;
'As ,j !\ {::/ A j c A,f-e^ri. Af a f. ^>.AX, i/c-'yS I XX fi~
, it,.
i
ffrV-/ r' tCi »dl,r;-\
d-Sc'v-'-
, IP -i
:.'»x
'¦ ; c'
¦¦ '¦ ?
7 5, f < >-
5 ;
x
C l> */»'' l"
-------
UTHOLQGIC LOG
Sediment Collection Log
EA Engineering. Science. & Technology, Inc.. PBC
Client Name and Project Name
Location/Boring Name
Sheet
of
1 Geologist Name/Signature
5 Project Number
!f5
CORE COLLECTION INFO
8 Date/Time Collected
Date/Time Processed
2 Drilling Subcontractor/Equipment Operator
8 Latitude/Northing/Grid
9 Sed Surface Elevation
10 Coordinate System
11 Depth of Water, ft (start/end)
3 Operator Name (License # If Required}
7 Lorigilude/Easting/SrW
12 Weather (Temp, circle conditions, wind direction)
Sunny/Cloudy/Rain
Sampling Equipment and Methodology (Check One)
13 Boring Depth (ft) 14 Recovery (ft) 15% Recovery
Rotosonic:
Core:
-ft barrel
-ft barrel
Grab Sample: -ft
Other:
Sample Collection Method:
-in diameter
-in diameter Manual Push/Vibracore
-ft x -ft. Box/PonarA/an Veen/Other
16 Location Notes
Interval
(Depth)
Recovery
(,ft&%)
Description of Materials
Munsell Color, Moisture; Density, Consistency (Other Remarks)
Sample ID
Sample Interval
PID
(ppm)
uses
Code
C-O^io
(0 iif
H&W-C-
tfKffT-C-Jt
1 ¦ ' ' C -
'5U-
,u|
i/vi n
; ¦ >¦ ¦¦ "
/ ! r
il I,
-------
Appendix B
Lithologic Core Logs
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Riverbend
SEDIMENT BORING HBT15-A
DATE COLLECTED 10/27/2015 10:45:00 AM
DATE LOGGED 10/28/2015 11:00:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Mateco
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.25
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
NORTHING* 306146.46
EASTING* 13485699.17
ELEVATION 564.2 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 100%
CQ LU
LU 3
Q E
< c
H
ID
<
W
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
12
21
27
24
36
Composite
Composite
HBT15-A-0010
HBT15-A-1030
ML-CL
Composite
HBT15-A-3050
Composite
HBT15-A-5070
Composite
HBT15-A-7010
SILTY CLAY: gray silty clay.
CLAYEY SAND: gray sand, little clay, trace gravel,
trace cobbles up to 1,5"x1.5"
SILT: gray silt with black bands, trace f sand.
Hydrocarbon odor.
SILT: gray silt with black bands, some f-m sand,
trace gravel. Hydrocarbon odor.
CH CLAY: gray fat clay, trace gravel.
ML
SILT: black silt.
CH
CLAY: gray fat clay, trace c sand/ f gravel. Black
streaking @4.6-4.7'
CL
CLAY: gray to dark gray to black clay with
gravel-sized pieces of brick, little gravel and wood
pieces, trace cobbles.
CL
CLAY: black clay. Hydrocarbon odor. @9.5-9.6'
black sand with little clay
CLAYEY SAND: black clayey sand.
CLAY: black clay. Hydrocarbon odor.
black sand with little clay
l.5-9.6'
End of Boring at 10 ft.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Riverbend
SEDIMENT BORING HBT15-B
DATE COLLECTED 10/30/2015 10:10:00 AM
DATE LOGGED 10/30/2015 10:10:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Mateco
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.25
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
NORTHING* 305884.38
EASTING* 13485670.72
ELEVATION 555.0 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 60%
CQ LU
LU 3
o ^
< c
if) o
>-
I—
LU
<
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Riverbend
SEDIMENT BORING HBT15-C
DATE COLLECTED 10/30/2015 1:05:00 PM
DATE LOGGED 11/2/2015 3:15:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Mateco
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.25
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
NORTHING* 305773.34
EASTING* 13485495.49
ELEVATION 552.0 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 89%
CQ LU
LU 3
Q E
< c
H
ID
<
W
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
13
Composite
HBT15-C-0010
23
Composite
HBT15-C-1030
15
Composite
Composite
HBT15-C-3040
HBT15-C-4050
ML-CL SILTY CLAY: black silty clay and mussel shells with
little gravel/brown c sand.
SM SILTY SAND: brown sand with black silty clay,
well-rounded gravel/pebbles, brick pieces, glass
shards. Slight hydrocarbon odor.
CL
CLAY: gray to dark gray clay, black streaking, trace
gravel, trace woody debris.
SC-CL SANDY CLAY: dark gray m-f sandy clay, little woody
debris, trace gravel/pebbles.
CH CLAY: gray fat clay.
SC-CL SANDY CLAY: black sandy clay, trace gravel, trace
organic debris. Hydrocarbon odor.
CH CLAY: gray fat clay, trace gravel.
End of Boring at 10 ft.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Riverbend
SEDIMENT BORING RB15-01
DATE COLLECTED 10/30/2015 3:15:00 PM
DATE LOGGED 11/3/2015 3:15:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Mateco
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.25
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
NORTHING* 303114.73
EASTING* 13478778.61
ELEVATION 565.5 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 51 %
CQ LU
LU 3
o ^
< c
if) o
>-
I—
LU
<
C0
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
o
o
_i
o
X
Q_
w
CO
<
_i
o
w
o
0/
o C
,o
3
ML-CL
CL-ML
ML-CL
SILT: dark gray silt, little vf sand, trace clay
SILTY CLAY: black to dark gray silty clay, some
organics, little vf sand.
CLAYEY SILT: dark gray clayey silt, black streaking,
slight hydrocarbon odor.
SILTY CLAY: black silty clay, little organics, little vf
sand.
ML-CL
ML-CL
ML-CL
SILTY CLAY: black silty clay, little organics, little vf
sand interbedded with gray silty clay.
ML-CL
SILTY CLAY: black silty clay, little organics, little vf
sand.
GM
SILTY CLAY: black silty clay, little organics, little vf
sand interbedded with gray silty clay.
SILTY CLAY: black silty clay, little organics, little vf
sand.
GRAVEL AND PEBBLES: dark gray to black silty
pebbles, chunks of asphalt, little c sand and angular
gravel.
End of Boring at 9 ft.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Riverbend
SEDIMENT BORING RB15-02
DATE COLLECTED 10/31/2015 9:25:00 AM
DATE LOGGED 11/3/2015 8:00:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Mateco
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.25
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
NORTHING* 302804.1
EASTING* 13478311.5
ELEVATION 547.3 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 110%
CQ LU
LU 3
Q E
< c
H
ID
<
W
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
12
Composite
RB15-02-0010
CLAYEY SAND: black m sand with clay, little shell
3q hash and woody debris. Strong Hydrocarbon odor.
In top 2" of core, aluminum can top and plastic
wrapper.
CL CLAY: black soft clay, strong hydrocarbon odor.
27
Composite
RB15-02-1030
SC
SAND: black f-m sand with clay, little organics,
strong hydrocarbon odor.
13
Composite
RB15-02-3040
SC SAND: black f-m sand with clay, little organics,
strong hydrocarbon odor.
CH CLAY: gray fat clay.
SC-CL SANDY CLAY: black f-m sandy clay, little organics,
strong hydrocarbon odor.
ML-CL SILTY CLAY: black silty clay with dense organic
material (leaves/twigs). Strong hydrocarbon odor.
CH CLAY: gray fat clay, trace gravel.
End of Boring at 10 ft.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Riverbend
SEDIMENT BORING RB15-03
DATE COLLECTED 10/31/2015 10:30:00 AM
DATE LOGGED 11/2/2015 2:00:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Mateco
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.25
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
NORTHING* 302542.34
EASTING* 13477154.36
ELEVATION 560.6 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 110%
CQ LU
LU 3
o ^
< c
if) o
>-
I—
LU
<
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Riverbend
SEDIMENT BORING RB15-04
DATE COLLECTED 10/31/2015 12:30:00 PM
DATE LOGGED 11/3/2015 9:00:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Mateco
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.25
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
NORTHING* 301389.25
EASTING* 13475078.56
ELEVATION 552.3 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 94%
CQ LU
LU 3
o ^
< c
if) o
>-
I—
LU
<
C0
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
o
o
_i
o
X
Q_
w
CO
<
_i
o
w
o
C0
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
SC
12
Composite
RB15-04-0010
u
ML-CL
GM
27
Composite
RB15-04-1030
SM
GRAVEL: black gravel-pebble sized pieces in black
silty clay, little f sand. Hydrocarbon odor.
SAND: tan to gray f-m sand, trace silt, trace wood
debris.
SM
SAND: tan to gray f-m sand, some silt, trace wood
debris. Slight hydrocarbon odor.
12
Composite
RB15-04-3040
CH
CLAY: gray fat clay, trace well-rounded gravel.
End of Boring at 10 ft.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Riverbend
SEDIMENT BORING RB15-05
DATE COLLECTED 10/31/2015 2:00:00 PM
DATE LOGGED 11/3/2015 9:45:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Mateco
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.25
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
NORTHING* 300277.73
EASTING* 13473696.44
ELEVATION 555.1 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 95%
CQ LU
LU 3
o ^
< c
if) o
>-
I—
LU
<
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Riverbend
SEDIMENT BORING RB15-06
DATE COLLECTED 10/31/2015 3:00:00 PM
DATE LOGGED 11/3/2015 10:00:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Mateco
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.25
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
NORTHING* 300122.59
EASTING* 13473589.27
ELEVATION 544.6 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 105%
CQ LU
LU 3
o ^
< c
if) o
>-
I—
ID
<
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Riverbend
SEDIMENT BORING RB15-07
DATE COLLECTED 11/1/2015 12:45:00 PM
DATE LOGGED 11/2/2015 8:30:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Mateco
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.25
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
NORTHING* 299895.29
EASTING* 13473274.78
ELEVATION 541.2 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 60%
CQ LU
LU 3
o ^
< c
if) o
>-
I—
LU
<
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Riverbend
SEDIMENT BORING RB15-08
DATE COLLECTED 11/1/2015 10:35:00 AM
DATE LOGGED 11/2/2015 9:50:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Mateco
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.25
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
NORTHING* 299725.55
EASTING* 13472951.82
ELEVATION 551.3 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 95%
CQ LU
LU 3
o ^
< c
if) o
>-
I—
LU
<
C0
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
o
o
_i
o
x
0-
w
U]
<
_1
o
w
o
w
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
12
Composite
SC-CL
RB15-08-0010
SANDY CLAY: gray semi-firm clay and gray f-m
sand, trace wood debris, trace cobbles, larqe rock
3"x3".
CH
CLAY: gray fat clay with trace well-rounded gravel.
End of Boring at 10 ft.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Riverbend
SEDIMENT BORING RB15-09
DATE COLLECTED 11/1/2015 9:30:00 AM
DATELOGGED 11/2/2015 10:15:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Mateco
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.25
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
NORTHING* 299651.35
EASTING* 13472911.57
ELEVATION 541.4 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 109%
CQ LU
LU 3
o ^
< c
if) o
>-
I—
LU
<
C0
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
o
o
_i
o
x
0-
w
U]
<
—I
o
w
o
w
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
Composite
RB15-09-0010
CH
GRAVEL: gravel and black c sand, little shell debris,
little dark gray silt, trace cobble-sized pieces of
asphalt.
CLAY: gray fat clay.
GRAVEL: gravel and black c sand, little shell debris,
little dark gray silt, trace cobble-sized pieces of
asphalt.
CLAY: gray fat clay, trace streaks of red, trace
well-rounded gravel.
End of Boring at 10 ft.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Riverbend
SEDIMENT BORING RB15-10
DATE COLLECTED 11/1/2015 8:15:00 AM
DATE LOGGED 11/2/2015 10:50:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Mateco
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.25
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
NORTHING* 299536.3
EASTING* 13472730.89
ELEVATION 547.2 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 109%
CQ LU
LU 3
o ^
< c
if) o
>-
I—
LU
<
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Riverbend
SEDIMENT BORING RB15-11
DATE COLLECTED 11/3/2015 11:55:00 AM
DATE LOGGED 11/4/2015 3:15:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Mateco
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.25
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
NORTHING* 299326.76
EASTING* 13472464.99
ELEVATION 546.6 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 105%
CQ LU
LU 3
o ^
< c
if) o
>-
I—
ID
<
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Riverbend
SEDIMENT BORING RB15-12
DATE COLLECTED 11/3/2015 10:40:00 AM
DATE LOGGED 11/4/2015 2:30:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Mateco
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.25
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
NORTHING* 299090.24
EASTING* 13472136.39
ELEVATION 560.2 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 22%
CQ LU
LU 3
o ^
< c
if) o
>-
I—
LU
<
C0
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
o
o
_i
o
X
Q_
FT!
Q>°
w
U]
<
—I
o
w
o
w
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
12
11
Composite
Composite
RB15-12-0010
RB15-12-1030
GM
SC
SC
SC-CL
SC
CL
SILTY GRAVEL: black silty sandy gravel and
pebbles, little shell hash and organics, trace brig
fragments. PID 89 PPM, orange staining on core
liner. Extremely strong Hydrocarbon odor.
CLAYEY SAND: black clayey sand with pebble-sized
pieces of brick.
SAND AND NAPL: black, sticky sand, free
product/NAPL, some organic material.
NAPL: black sticky vf sandy clay with NAPL, little
organics.
SAND AND NAPL: black, sticky sand, free
product/NAPL, some organic material.
CLAY: gray soft clay.
End of Boring at 10 ft.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Scftrtc®, and
Technology, Inc., PEG
PROJECT NAME Riverbend
SEDIMENT BORING RB15-13
DATE COLLECTED 11/2/2015 3:10:00 PM
DATELOGGED 11/4/2015 11:00:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Mateco
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.25
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
NORTHING* 298768.77
EASTING* 13471722.11
ELEVATION 551.9 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 109%
CQ LLl
LD 3
Q E
< c
H
UJ
<
W
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
12
17
Composite
Composite
SC
RB15-13-0010
RB15-13-1025
ML-CL
ML
CLAYEY SAND: black clayey m-c sand with some
gravel, little twig, shell/brick fragments. Hydrocarbon
odor.
SILTY CLAY: dark gray silty clay, trace vf sand.
Hydrocarbon odor.
ML
ML-CL
SC-CL
SANDY SILT: dark gray f sandy silt. Hydrocarbon
odor.
SC
SC-CL
SILTY SAND: black silty sand, little organics (twigs,
roots). Hydrocarbon odor.
14
Composite
RB15-13-2535
ML-CL
SC-CL
ML-CL
SC-CL
SM
SANDY SILT: dark gray f sandy silt. Hydrocarbon
odor.
SILTY CLAY: dark gray silty clay, trace vf sand.
Hydrocarbon odor.
SANDY CLAY: black f sandy clay, little organics.
Hydrocarbon odor.
17
Composite
RB15-13-3550
CLAYEY SAND: dark gray to black clayey f sand.
Hydrocarbon odor.
SANDY CLAY: black f sandy clay, little organics.
Hydrocarbon odor.
SILTY CLAY: dark gray silty clay, trace vf sand.
Hydrocarbon odor.
SANDY CLAY: dark gray to black f-m sandy clay,
little organics, trace gravel. Hydrocarbon odor.
SILTY CLAY: dark gray silty clay, trace vf sand.
Hydrocarbon odor.
SANDY CLAY: dark gray to black f-m sandy clay,
little organics, trace gravel. Hydrocarbon odor.
SILTY SAND: black silty m sand.
CH
CLAY: gray fat clay. Boulders @7'. Draw-down
visible on outside of clay.
End of Boring at 10 ft.
1 B
1 S
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Riverbend
SEDIMENT BORING RB15-14
DATE COLLECTED 11/2/2015 2:20:00 PM
DATE LOGGED 11/4/2015 10:20:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Mateco
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.25
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
NORTHING* 298710.13
EASTING* 13471679.19
ELEVATION 552.2 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 100%
CQ LU
LU 3
o ^
< c
if) o
>-
I—
ID
<
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Riverbend
SEDIMENT BORING RB15-15
DATE COLLECTED 11/2/2015 1:00:00 PM
DATE LOGGED 11/4/2015 9:30:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Mateco
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.25
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
NORTHING* 298580.9
EASTING* 13471561.38
ELEVATION 550.7 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 100%
CQ LU
LU 3
o ^
< c
if) o
>-
I—
LU
<
C0
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
E
12
Composite
RB15-15-0010
14
Composite
RB15-15-1020
25
Composite
RB15-15-2040
CL
SC
21
Composite
RB15-15-4060
GM SANDY GRAVEL: black c sandy gravel, little silt, little
pebbles/cobbles, shell/brick fragments, trace
SC-CL organics. Hydrocarbon odor.
SANDY CLAY: black f-vf sandy clay, trace organics.
Hydrocarbon odor.
CH CLAY: gray fat clay, trace gravel.
3q CLAYEY SAND: black clayey f sand, gravel-sized
pieces of slag, orange sheen. Hydrocarbon odor.
CLAY: black to dark gray clay, trace vf sand.
Hydrocarbon odor.
CLAYEY SAND: black clayey f sand, gravel-sized
pieces of slag, orange sheen. Hydrocarbon odor.
@3.6-3.7' and 3.8-3.9': dense organics (woody
debris)
CH CLAY: gray fat clay, trace gravel.
End of Boring at 10 ft.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Riverbend
SEDIMENT BORING RB15-16
DATE COLLECTED 11/2/2015 11:35:00 AM
DATE LOGGED 11/4/2015 8:30:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Mateco
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.25
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
NORTHING* 298407.02
EASTING* 13471420.29
ELEVATION 550.0 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 88%
CQ LU
LU 3
o ^
< c
if) o
>-
I—
ID
<
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Riverbend
SEDIMENT BORING RB15-17
DATE COLLECTED 11/2/2015 9:05:00 AM
DATE LOGGED 11/3/2015 1:45:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Mateco
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.25
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
NORTHING* 297738.73
EASTING* 13470835.87
ELEVATION 542.4 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 86%
CQ LU
LU 3
Q E
< c
H
ID
<
W
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
12
Composite
RB15-17-0010
GP GRAVEL AND PEBBLES: well-rounded gravel and
ML pebbles. Hydrocarbon odor.
SILT: black silt with c sand, gravel, Hydrocarbon
odor.
24
Composite
RB15-17-1030
CH CLAY: gray fat clay, trace gravel.
End of Boring at 10 ft.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Riverbend
SEDIMENT BORING RB15-18
DATE COLLECTED 11/1/2015 3:15:00 PM
DATE LOGGED 11/2/2015 4:15:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Mateco
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.25
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
NORTHING* 295808.17
EASTING* 13469497.04
ELEVATION 543.7 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 73%
CQ LU
LU 3
o ^
< c
if) o
>-
I—
ID
<
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Riverbend
SEDIMENT BORING RB15-19
DATE COLLECTED 11/2/2015 5:05:00 PM
DATE LOGGED 11/3/2015 11:11:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Mateco
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.25
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
NORTHING* 294194.33
EASTING* 13468398.52
ELEVATION 546.9 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 105%
CQ LU
LU 3
o ^
< c
if) o
>-
I—
LU
<
C0
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
o
o
_i
o
x
0-
w
U]
<
_1
o
w
o
w
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
12
24
Composite
Composite
RB15-19-0010
RB15-19-1030
SP
SAND: black m-c sand with gravel, pebbles, cobbles,
trace shell hash, trace silt. Hydrocarbon odor.
CH
CLAY: gray fat clay, trace gravel.
End of Boring at 10 ft.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Riverbend
SEDIMENT BORING RB15-20
DATE COLLECTED 11/4/2015 2:15:00 PM
DATE LOGGED 11/5/2015 8:45:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Mateco
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.25
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
NORTHING* 293665.6
EASTING* 13467984.83
ELEVATION 553.3 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 92%
CQ LU
LU 3
o ^
< c
if) o
>-
I—
ID
<
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Riverbend
SEDIMENT BORING RB15-21
DATE COLLECTED 11/4/2015 12:40:00 PM
DATE LOGGED 11/5/2015 10:00:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Mateco
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.25
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
NORTHING* 293509.86
EASTING* 13467939.09
ELEVATION 552.3 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 48%
CQ LU
LU 3
o ^
< c
if) o
>-
I—
ID
<
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Riverbend
SEDIMENT BORING RB15-22
DATE COLLECTED 11/3/2015 4:50:00 PM
DATE LOGGED 11/4/2015 3:45:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Mateco
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.25
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
NORTHING* 292856.1
EASTING* 13467469.49
ELEVATION 550.5 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 87%
CQ LU
LU 3
o ^
< c
if) o
>-
I—
LU
<
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Riverbend
SEDIMENT BORING RB15-23
DATE COLLECTED 11/3/2015 3:05:00 PM
DATE LOGGED 11/5/2015 10:55:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Mateco
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.25
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
NORTHING* 292321.71
EASTING* 13467079.36
ELEVATION 546.4 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 50%
CQ LU
LU 3
o ^
< c
if) o
>-
I—
LU
<
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Riverbend
SEDIMENT BORING RB15-24
DATE COLLECTED 11/4/2015 9:20:00 AM
DATE LOGGED 11/5/2015 9:15:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Mateco
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.25
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
NORTHING* 291288.86
EASTING* 13466240.31
ELEVATION 548.1 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 110%
CQ LU
LU 3
o ^
< c
if) o
>-
I—
ID
<
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Riverbend
SEDIMENT BORING RB15-25
DATE COLLECTED 11/4/2015 10:30:00 AM
DATELOGGED 11/5/2015 11:30:00 AM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Mateco
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.25
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
NORTHING* 290945.1
EASTING* 13465982.89
ELEVATION 536.2 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 82%
CQ LU
LU 3
o ^
< c
if) o
>-
I—
LU
<
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Riverbend
SEDIMENT BORING RB15-26
DATE COLLECTED 11/3/2015 8:00:00 AM
DATE LOGGED 11/4/2015 1:20:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Mateco
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.25
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
NORTHING* 290473.79
EASTING* 13465708.22
ELEVATION 535.7 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 92%
CQ LU
LU 3
o ^
< c
if) o
>-
I—
ID
<
-------
PA ag* SEDIMENT BORING RB15-27
WMKmwB Technology, Inc., PEG
PROJECT NAME Riverbend PROJECT NUMBER 62561.25
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
DATE COLLECTED 10/26/2015 3130100 PM NORTHING* ^899^0 05
DATE LOGGED 10/28/2015 3:00:00 PM EASTING* 13465465 44
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Mateco ELEVATION 533.6 ft (NAVD 88)
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring Surface)
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas RECOVERY 70 %
DEPTH BELOW
3 MUDLINE (ft)
SAMPLE INTERVAL
(inches)
SAMPLE TYPE
SAMPLE SUBMITTED FOR ANALYSIS
(Sample ID at sample depth)
GRAPHIC LOG
USCS CLASS
MATERIAL DESCRIPTION
g
sz
"5.
0)
Q
12
Composite
RB15-27-0010
GW
GRAVEL: rounded-well-rounded gravel, trace c gray
sand.
SP
1 n
SAND: black m-c sand, trace gravel, trace pebbles,
trace silt. Hydrocarbon odor.
-2 -
24
Composite
RB15-27-1030
'//
///
///
///
///
//
//
//
//
//
ML-CL
SILTY CLAY: dark gray silty clay, trace organics.
Hydrocarbon odor. , „
//
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
///
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
/
//
, ML-CL ,
ML-CL
SILTY CLAY: gray silty clay and well-rounded
qravel/c sand. Stronq hyrdocarbon odor.
SILTY CLAY: dark gray silty clay, trace organics,
trace well-rounded gravel. Hydrocarbon odor.
¦4 -
24
Composite
RB15-27-3050
%
//
///
///
///
///
//
//
//
//
//
//
ML-CL
SM
, ML-CL
SILTY CLAY: light gray silty clay interbedded with
dark gray silty soft clay and little fine gravel, little
orqanics. Hydrocarbon odor.
15
9.7
38
/
//
///
///
///
///
///
///
//
//
//
//
//
//
//
, ML-CL
I SM ,
, ML-CL /
ML-CL
odor.
SILTY CLAY: light gray silty soft clay, little organics.
Hydrocarbon odor.
4 1
44
4 9
SILTY CLAY: dark gray silty clay, some organics,
trace f sand. Hydrocarbon odor.
-5
-6 -
15
Composite
RB15-27-5065
///
///
///
///
//
//
//
//
ML-CL
SAND: f-m sand, trace silt.
ML-CL
SILTY CLAY: light gray silty clay, trace vf sand,
fibrous orqanics.
¦ ::: ' :
SC
R3
SILTY CLAY: light gray silty clay, little c sand/angular
9
Composite
RB15-27-6570
SP
SILTY CLAY: dark gray silty clay, little organics, trace
f sand.
-7 -
-8 -
-9 -
-10 —
-11 -
-12 -
SILTY CLAY: dark gray silty clay and organics, trace
f sand.
CLAYEY SAND: black f sand, little organics (roots,
small wood chips), trace clay. @ 6.1-6.3' gum-like
consistency, possibly coal tar.
SAND: tan sand, trace clay.
End of Boring at 10 ft.
NOTES:
* Coordinates in Michigan State Plane South (US Survey foot)
"End of Boring" indicates depth of maximum penetration used to calculate % recovery for each core.
PAGE 1 of 1
-------
EA Engineering,
Science, and
Technology, Inc., PBC
PROJECT NAME Riverbend
SEDIMENT BORING RB15-28
DATE COLLECTED 10/26/2015 1:45:00 PM
DATE LOGGED 10/28/2015 2:30:00 PM
DRILLING CONTRACTOR Mateco
DRILLING METHOD Sonic Coring
LOGGED BY M. Gelinas
PROJECT NUMBER 62561.25
LOCATION Detroit, Ml
NORTHING* 289557.24
EASTING* 13465353.43
ELEVATION 530.9 ft (NAVD 88)
(Sediment Surface)
RECOVERY 100%
CQ LU
LU 3
o ^
< c
if) o
>-
I—
ID
<
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
APPENDIX C:
PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.25
May 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: RB15-01
RBI 5-01-SURF
- •' ?
-
9 -
09/26/2015 03:42
RB15-01-3050
w m
RB15-01-0010
RB15-01-1030
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
Appendix C
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC EA Project No.: 62561.25
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology May 2016
RBI 5-02-sluff
Photographic Record
Sample location: RB15-02
RB15-02-SURF
RB15-02-3040
RBI 5-02-0010
RBI 5-02-1030
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.25
May 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: RB15-03
RB15-03-SURF RB15-Q3-1030
RB15-03-3050
RBI 5-03-0010
RB15-03-1030
RB15-03-3050
1 liQ2isifeil
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.25
May 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: RBI5-04
RB15-04-SURF RBI 5-04-3040
No photo taken.
RBI 5-04-0010
RBI 5-04-1030
s ofoo
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.25
May 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: RBI5-05
RB15-05-SURF
RBI 5-05-0010
RB15-05-1030
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.25
May 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: RB15-06
RB15-06-SURF
No Photo taken.
RBI 5-06-0010
fll3\!5 I
-KBS'C ,
o~
RB15-06-1030
¦ His'
0?^
Jia
_
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
Appendix C
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC EA Project No.: 62561.25
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology May 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: RBI5-07
RB15-07-SURF
¦
RB15-07B-1020
RB15-07A-0005
"/z/fS 09Z^ |
r' 'FBIS-o^
.* °-o.s x
RB15-07B-0010
RB15-07C-0005
RB15-07B-2030
Riverbend Area Site Characterization Site Cliaracterization Report
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.25
May 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: RBI5-08
RB15-08-SURF
r r
& • -
/
i 7
t
T \«\w ¦
A icrtf Mjk
RBI 5-08-0010
J
t'Mts cfjso
i/Q if J—Uo
CM'
w mMm
a -k $wm
J,
' -m
»> ' •
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.25
May 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: RBI5-09
RB15-09-SURF
RBI 5-09-0010
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.25
May 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: RB15-10
RB15-10-SURF
RBI 5-10-0010
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.25
May 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: RB15-11
RBI 5-11-SURF
RBI 5-11-0010
-
. i
mWM®
«? 'tT -i ',i tt\ V
RB15-11-1030
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.25
May 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: RB15-12
RB15-12-SURF RB15-12 material in core catcher
No photo taken; no recovery.
RBI 5-12-0010
RB15-12-1020
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.25
May 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: RB15-13
RB15-13-SURF RB15-13-2535
RBI 5-13-0010
RB15-13-3550
RB15-13-1025
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.25
May 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: RB15-14
RB15-14-SURF RB15-14-3050
RBI 5-14-0010
RB15-14-1030
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.25
May 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: RB15-15
RB15-15-SURF RB15-15-2040
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
Appendix C
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC EA Project No.: 62561.25
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology May 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: RB15-16
RB15-16-SURF RB15-16-3040
RBI 5-16-0010
RBI 5-16-3040
RB15-16-1030
RB15-16-4060
11/04/20]
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.25
May 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: RBI5-17
RB15-17-SURF
RBI 5-17-0010
'? }3\tS
n
o-/'
RBI 5-17-1030
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.25
May 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: RB15-18
RB15-18-SURF
RBI 5-18-0010
O- /'
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.25
May 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: RBI5-19
RB15-19-SURF
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
Appendix C
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC EA Project No.: 62561.25
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology May 2016
RBI 5-20-0010
Photographic Record
Sample location: RB15-20
RB15-20-SURF RBI 5-20-2040
RB15-20-1020
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.25
May 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: RB15-21
RBI 5-21-SURF
RBI 5-21-0010
KXJO
f&IS-Z I
CM'
RBI 5-21-1020
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Micliigan
Site Cliaracterization Report
-------
Appendix C
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC EA Project No.: 62561.25
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology May 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: RB15-22
RB15-22-SURF RBI 5-22-2030
RBI 5-22-0010
RB15-22-3050
i 1/4ft5"
S O-l'
^^1
:t 4 5 ft -6 , ¦ 10 11 ^ ' *i-U
1 uMMpli H 11 Hi—
i
aft/is \
3-5'
- JU ?
P
;—n—— —
RBI 5-22-1020
'//?'fc
i-z'
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.25
May 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: RB15-23
RB15-23-SURF RB15-23-3050
RBI 5-23-0010
Jf nfciP* /ps-5
2-S
L < o-/'
.
' —n*
» .2 ,3| , <| , S | Bj 7 s 3 W
IP "TO to.
15
RB15-23-1030
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.25
May 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: RB15-24
RB15-24-SURF RBI 5-24-4050
RBI 5-24-5060
RBI 5-24-2040
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.25
May 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: RB15-25
RB15-25-SURF
RBI 5-25-0010
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.25
May 2016
RB15-26-3050
m
TbIS
MJWW8 '
RBI 5-26-0010
Photographic Record
Sample location: RB15-26
RB15-26-SURF
RBI 5-26-1030
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.25
May 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: RB15-27
RB15-27-SURF
RBI 5-27-0010
27
or
RBI 5-27-1030
•: - (< <¦>'i>\ J |
¦v,
¦t; * t
IKvuggl-''
*. ¦* ¦>.
RB15-27-1030
JfcTv 1?bl5-27
|| 3-5'
¦—as
I
BwSlfZH??
} |
—Ml— ;
RBI 5-27-5065
5-b.S'
RB15-27-6570
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.25
May 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: RB15-28
RBI 5-28-0010
RB15-28-1030
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.25
May 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: HBT15-A
HBT15-A-SURF HBT15-A-3050
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
Appendix C
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC EA Project No.: 62561.25
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology May 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: HBT15-B
HBT15-B-SURF HBT15-B-3055
HBT15-B-0010
HBT15-B-5560
HBT15-B-1030
HBT
o-r
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, (MI) PLC
and its affiliate EA Science and Technology
Appendix C
EA Project No.: 62561.25
May 2016
Photographic Record
Sample location: HBT15-C
HBT15-C-SURF HBT15-C-3040
HBT15-C-3040
•.-» /if -i
HBT15-C-1030
HBT15-C-4050
Riverbend Area Site Characterization
Detroit River Area of Concern, Detroit, Michigan
Site Characterization Report
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
Appendix D
Particle Size Graphs
-------
This page intentionally left blank
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 11/3/2015
Sample ID: RB15-01-SURF Percent Solids: 43.4% Start Date: 11/18/2015
Lab ID: 200-30555-E-8 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/25/2015
Shape (>#10): subrounded Non-soil material: shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
<
\
.c
\
J
\
*
\
.0
dJ
£
d
Qi
100000 10000 1000 100 10 1
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
Particle
Percent
Incremental
size
size, um
finer
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
99.7
0.3
#10
2000
99.3
0.4
#20
850
98.7
0.6
#40
425
98.0
0.7
#60
250
96.5
1.5
#80
180
95.4
1.1
#100
150
94.1
1.3
#200
75
79.2
14.9
Hyd1
31.4
49.6
29.6
Hyd2
20.3
45.6
4.0
Hyd3
12
39.0
6.6
Hyd4
8.5
35.0
4.0
Hyd5
6.4
29.6
5.4
Hyd6
3.3
21.6
8.0
Hyd7
1.4
15.0
6.6
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
0.3
Sand
20.5
Coarse Sand
0.4
Medium Sand
1.3
Fine Sand
18.8
Silt
49.6
Clay
29.6
TestAmerica Burlington
200-30555-E-8 11/25/2015
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 11/3/2015
Sample ID: RB15-02-SURF Percent Solids: 71.9% Start Date: 11/23/2015
Lab ID: 200-30555-E-10 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/27/2015
Shape (>#10): subangular Non-soil material: shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
¦E
'5
¦Q
ai
£
Y
a
\
at
\
X
\
\
\
>—
—
—
-0-
-o-
—o
100000 10000 1000 100 10 1
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
Particle
Percent
Incremental
size
size, um
finer
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
95.4
4.6
#4
4750
91.2
4.2
#10
2000
88.5
2.7
#20
850
87.3
1.2
#40
425
84.7
2.6
#60
250
71.8
12.9
#80
180
44.8
27.0
#100
150
26.5
18.3
#200
75
3.4
23.1
Hyd1
36.7
2.1
1.3
Hyd2
23.3
1.7
0.4
Hyd3
13.5
1.7
0.0
Hyd4
9.7
1.2
0.4
Hyd5
6.9
1.2
0.0
Hyd6
3.4
0.5
0.7
Hyd7
1.4
0.4
0.1
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
8.8
Sand
87.8
Coarse Sand
2.7
Medium Sand
3.8
Fine Sand
81.3
Silt
2.1
Clay
1.2
TestAmerica Burlington
200-30555-E-10 11/27/2015
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Sample ID:
Lab ID:"
RB15-02-SURFFD
200-30555-E-11
Percent Solids:
Specific Gravity:
71.5%
2.650
Date Received:
Start Date:
End Date:
11/3/2015
11/23/2015
11/27/2015
Shape (> #10): subangular
Non-soil material: shell,slag
Hardness (> #10): hard
100000
10000
1000 100
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
Particle
Percent
Incremental
size
size, um
finer
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
85.4
14.6
3/4 inch
19000
85.4
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
82.8
2.6
#4
4750
79.2
3.6
#10
2000
76.7
2.5
#20
850
75.6
1.1
#40
425
73.3
2.3
#60
250
61.6
11.7
#80
180
37.8
23.8
#100
150
23.1
14.7
#200
75
4.6
18.5
Hyd1
36.7
2.1
2.5
Hyd2
23.3
1.7
0.4
Hyd3
13.5
1.7
0.0
Hyd4
9.7
1.3
0.4
Hyd5
6.6
1.3
0.0
Hyd6
3.4
0.5
0.7
Hyd7
1.4
0.4
0.1
TestAmerica Burlington
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
20.8
Sand
74.6
Coarse Sand
2.5
Medium Sand
3.4
Fine Sand
68.7
Silt
3.3
Clay
1.3
200-30555-E-11 11/27/2015
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 11/3/2015
Sample ID: RB15-03-SURF Percent Solids: 45.1% Start Date: 11/23/2015
Lab ID: 200-30555-E-12 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/27/2015
Shape (>#10): subrounded Non-soil material: shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
98.8
1.2
#10
2000
95.6
3.2
#20
850
88.4
7.2
#40
425
81.2
7.2
#60
250
72.8
8.4
#80
180
68.2
4.6
#100
150
65.6
2.6
#200
75
57.3
8.3
Hyd1
30.9
45.3
12.0
Hyd2
20
40.5
4.8
Hyd3
12
32.9
7.6
Hyd4
8.6
26.8
6.1
Hyd5
6.2
24.3
2.5
Hyd6
3.3
17.3
7.0
Hyd7
1.4
11.0
6.3
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
1.2
Sand
41.5
Coarse Sand
3.2
Medium Sand
14.4
Fine Sand
23.9
Silt
33.0
Clay
24.3
TestAmerica Burlington
200-30555-E-12 11/27/2015
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 11/3/2015
Sample ID: RB15-04-SURF Percent Solids: 72.2% Start Date: 11/23/2015
Lab ID: 200-30555-E-13 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/27/2015
Shape (>#10): subangular Non-soil material: shell,slag
Hardness (> #10): hard
2:
c
'p
SI
0)
c
<1
\
-
-o-
—o
100000 10000 1000 100 10 1
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
95.8
4.2
3/4 inch
19000
95.8
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
90.1
5.7
#4
4750
83.4
6.7
#10
2000
72.6
10.8
#20
850
58.8
13.8
#40
425
42.9
15.9
#60
250
23.8
19.1
#80
180
15.2
8.6
#100
150
11.4
3.8
#200
75
6.0
5.4
Hyd1
36.4
3.0
3.1
Hyd2
23.1
2.5
0.4
Hyd3
13.4
2.1
0.4
Hyd4
9.4
1.7
0.4
Hyd5
6.8
1.3
0.4
Hyd6
3.3
1.0
0.3
Hyd7
1.4
0.4
0.5
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
16.6
Sand
77.4
Coarse Sand
10.8
Medium Sand
29.7
Fine Sand
36.9
Silt
4.7
Clay
1.3
TestAmerica Burlington
200-30555-E-13 11/27/2015
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 11/3/2015
Sample ID: RB15-05-SURF Percent Solids: 76.1% Start Date: 11/23/2015
Lab ID: 200-30555-E-14 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/27/2015
Shape (>#10): subangular Non-soil material: shell,slag
Hardness (> #10): hard
\
\
.c
53
£
\
\
si
dj
£
\
\
d
Qi
y-
-o-
—o
100000 10000 1000 100 10 1
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
82.3
17.7
3/4 inch
19000
82.3
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
63.5
18.8
#4
4750
41.2
22.3
#10
2000
32.3
8.9
#20
850
29.6
2.7
#40
425
28.0
1.6
#60
250
25.2
2.8
#80
180
22.8
2.4
#100
150
21.8
1.0
#200
75
20.4
1.4
Hyd1
35.9
5.1
15.3
Hyd2
22.9
4.1
1.0
Hyd3
13.5
2.0
2.0
Hyd4
9.3
1.5
0.5
Hyd5
6.8
1.5
0.0
Hyd6
3.3
0.6
0.9
Hyd7
1.4
0.6
0.0
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
58.8
Sand
20.8
Coarse Sand
8.9
Medium Sand
4.3
Fine Sand
7.6
Silt
18.9
Clay
1.5
TestAmerica Burlington
200-30555-E-14 11/27/2015
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 11/3/2015
Sample ID: RB15-06-SURF Percent Solids: 58.6% Start Date: 11/23/2015
Lab ID: 200-30555-E-15 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/27/2015
Shape (>#10): subangular Non-soil material: shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
in0
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
Particle
Percent
Incremental
size
size, um
finer
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
84.7
15.3
#4
4750
59.2
25.5
#10
2000
51.6
7.6
#20
850
49.8
1.8
#40
425
47.8
2.0
#60
250
41.9
5.9
#80
180
31.9
10.0
#100
150
23.3
8.6
#200
75
10.9
12.4
Hyd1
34.9
7.7
3.2
Hyd2
22.3
6.8
1.0
Hyd3
13.2
3.9
2.9
Hyd4
9.5
2.4
1.5
Hyd5
6.6
1.9
0.5
Hyd6
3.3
1.6
0.4
Hyd7
1.4
1.1
0.5
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
40.8
Sand
48.3
Coarse Sand
7.6
Medium Sand
3.8
Fine Sand
36.9
Silt
9.0
Clay
1.9
TestAmerica Burlington
200-30555-E-15
11/27/2015
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 11/3/2015
Sample ID: RB15-07-SURF Percent Solids: 76.6% Start Date: 11/23/2015
Lab ID: 200-30555-N-9 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/27/2015
Shape (>#10): subangular Non-soil material: shell,slag
Hardness (> #10): hard
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
Particle
Percent
Incremental
size
size, um
finer
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
85.7
14.3
3/4 inch
19000
82.3
3.4
3/8 inch
9500
66.0
16.3
#4
4750
48.2
17.8
#10
2000
38.7
9.5
#20
850
32.8
5.9
#40
425
26.5
6.3
#60
250
19.0
7.5
#80
180
14.5
4.5
#100
150
12.0
2.5
#200
75
7.0
5.0
Hyd1
35.1
4.5
2.4
Hyd2
22.4
3.9
0.6
Hyd3
13.1
3.0
0.9
Hyd4
9.4
2.4
0.6
Hyd5
6.8
1.8
0.6
Hyd6
3.3
1.0
0.8
Hyd7
1.4
0.9
0.1
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
51.8
Sand
41.2
Coarse Sand
9.5
Medium Sand
12.2
Fine Sand
19.5
Silt
5.1
Clay
1.8
TestAmerica Burlington
200-30555-N-9
11/27/2015
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 11/3/2015
Sample ID: RB15-08-SURF Percent Solids: 77.2% Start Date: 11/18/2015
Lab ID: 200-30555-E-1 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/25/2015
Shape (>#10): subrounded Non-soil material: shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
Particle
Percent
Incremental
size
size, um
finer
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
96.7
3.3
#4
4750
90.2
6.5
#10
2000
83.0
7.2
#20
850
76.0
7.0
#40
425
66.0
10.0
#60
250
47.0
19.0
#80
180
27.9
19.1
#100
150
16.9
11.0
#200
75
4.1
12.8
Hyd1
36.9
3.2
1.0
Hyd2
23.5
2.7
0.4
Hyd3
13.6
2.3
0.4
Hyd4
9.8
1.8
0.4
Hyd5
6.7
1.4
0.4
Hyd6
3.4
1.4
0.0
Hyd7
1.4
1.0
0.4
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
9.8
Sand
86.1
Coarse Sand
7.2
Medium Sand
17.0
Fine Sand
61.9
Silt
2.7
Clay
1.4
TestAmerica Burlington
200-30555-E-1
11/25/2015
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 11/3/2015
Sample ID: RB15-08-SURFFD Percent Solids: 78.7% Start Date: 11/18/2015
Lab ID: 200-30555-E-2 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/25/2015
Shape (> #10): subrounded
Non-soil material: shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
100
90
Sieve
Particle
Percent
Incremental
size
size, um
finer
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
98.8
1.2
#4
4750
91.7
7.1
#10
2000
83.3
8.4
#20
850
76.5
6.8
#40
425
66.8
9.7
#60
250
49.0
17.8
#80
180
30.0
19.0
#100
150
17.5
12.5
#200
75
4.2
13.3
Hyd1
37.1
2.6
1.6
Hyd2
23.5
2.6
0.0
Hyd3
13.7
1.8
0.8
Hyd4
9.5
1.4
0.4
Hyd5
6.9
1.4
0.0
Hyd6
3.4
0.9
0.4
Hyd7
1.4
0.5
0.4
TestAmerica Burlington
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
8.3
Sand
87.5
Coarse Sand
8.4
Medium Sand
16.5
Fine Sand
62.6
Silt
2.8
Clay
1.4
200-30555-E-2 11/25/2015
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 11/3/2015
Sample ID: RB15-09-SURF Percent Solids: 59.1% Start Date: 11/18/2015
Lab ID: 200-30555-E-3 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/25/2015
Shape (>#10): subrounded Non-soil material: shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
90.9
9.1
#4
4750
77.6
13.3
#10
2000
66.2
11.4
#20
850
61.5
4.7
#40
425
55.7
5.8
#60
250
47.8
7.9
#80
180
39.1
8.7
#100
150
32.8
6.3
#200
75
18.8
14.0
Hyd1
34.3
13.9
4.9
Hyd2
22.1
11.4
2.5
Hyd3
13
8.9
2.5
Hyd4
9.2
7.0
1.9
Hyd5
6.8
5.1
1.9
Hyd6
3.4
3.3
1.9
Hyd7
1.4
2.0
1.3
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
22.4
Sand
58.8
Coarse Sand
11.4
Medium Sand
10.5
Fine Sand
36.9
Silt
13.7
Clay
5.1
TestAmerica Burlington
200-30555-E-3 11/25/2015
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 11/3/2015
Sample ID: RB15-09-SURFFD Percent Solids: 55.7% Start Date: 11/18/2015
Lab ID: 200-30555-E-4 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/25/2015
Shape (>#10): subrounded Non-soil material: shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
81.7
18.3
#4
4750
68.6
13.1
#10
2000
58.3
10.3
#20
850
55.1
3.2
#40
425
50.5
4.6
#60
250
43.9
6.6
#80
180
36.5
7.4
#100
150
30.6
5.9
#200
75
17.9
12.7
Hyd1
34.3
15.7
2.2
Hyd2
22.1
12.9
2.8
Hyd3
13.1
9.3
3.6
Hyd4
9.3
6.5
2.8
Hyd5
6.8
5.1
1.4
Hyd6
3.3
3.0
2.1
Hyd7
1.4
2.3
0.7
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
31.4
Sand
50.7
Coarse Sand
10.3
Medium Sand
7.8
Fine Sand
32.6
Silt
12.8
Clay
5.1
TestAmerica Burlington
200-30555-E-4 11/25/2015
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 11/3/2015
Sample ID: RB15-10-SURF Percent Solids: 66.3% Start Date: 11/18/2015
Lab ID: 200-30555-I-5 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/25/2015
Shape (>#10): subrounded Non-soil material: shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
\
\
\
\
\
.c
J
\
*
\
.0
V
dJ
£
a
a
—o
100000 10000 1000 100 10 1
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
Particle
Percent
Incremental
size
size, um
finer
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
68.5
31.5
#4
4750
46.0
22.5
#10
2000
34.4
11.6
#20
850
30.2
4.2
#40
425
27.7
2.5
#60
250
23.5
4.2
#80
180
19.5
4.0
#100
150
16.9
2.6
#200
75
13.0
3.9
Hyd1
36.1
5.3
7.7
Hyd2
23
4.5
0.9
Hyd3
13.6
2.3
2.2
Hyd4
9.4
1.0
1.3
Hyd5
6.9
0.5
0.4
Hyd6
3.3
0.5
0.0
Hyd7
1.4
0.5
0.0
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
54.0
Sand
33.0
Coarse Sand
11.6
Medium Sand
6.7
Fine Sand
14.7
Silt
12.5
Clay
0.5
TestAmerica Burlington
200-30555-I-5 11/25/2015
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Sample ID:
Lab ID:"
RB15-11-SURF
200-30593-J-1
Percent Solids:
Specific Gravity:
48.7%
2.650
Date Received:
Start Date:
End Date:
11/5/2015
11/27/2015
12/2/2015
Shape (> #10): subrounded
Non-soil material: shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
£
\
\
\
\
\
J
x
*
s
S
.c
s
S
dj
£
\
a
a
a
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100000
10000
1000 100
Particle Size, microns (um)
10
Sieve
Particle
Percent
Incremental
size
size, um
finer
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
70.2
29.8
3/8 inch
9500
63.0
7.2
#4
4750
43.3
19.7
#10
2000
36.5
6.8
#20
850
34.4
2.1
#40
425
31.5
2.9
#60
250
27.8
3.7
#80
180
25.1
2.7
#100
150
23.4
1.7
#200
75
19.0
4.4
Hyd1
33.4
18.1
0.9
Hyd2
21.6
15.2
2.9
Hyd3
12.7
13.1
2.1
Hyd4
8.9
10.9
2.2
Hyd5
6.6
00
00
2.1
Hyd6
3.1
6.6
2.2
Hyd7
1.4
4.5
2.1
TestAmerica Burlington
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
56.7
Sand
24.3
Coarse Sand
6.8
Medium Sand
5.0
Fine Sand
12.5
Silt
10.2
Clay
00
00
200-30593-J-1 12/2/2015
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 11/4/2015
Sample ID: RB15-13-SURF Percent Solids: 73.2% Start Date: 11/25/2015
Lab ID: 200-30575-E-16 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/30/2015
Shape (>#10): subangular Non-soil material: shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
Particle
Percent
Incremental
size
size, um
finer
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
94.0
6.0
#4
4750
83.9
10.1
#10
2000
71.9
12.0
#20
850
65.3
6.6
#40
425
56.5
00
00
#60
250
43.4
13.1
#80
180
31.2
12.2
#100
150
23.0
8.2
#200
75
00
00
14.3
Hyd1
36.2
4.8
4.0
Hyd2
23
4.3
0.4
Hyd3
13.4
3.9
0.4
Hyd4
9.5
3.1
0.8
Hyd5
7
2.2
0.8
Hyd6
3.4
1.4
0.8
Hyd7
1.4
1.6
-0.2
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
16.1
Sand
75.2
Coarse Sand
12.0
Medium Sand
15.4
Fine Sand
47.8
Silt
6.5
Clay
2.2
TestAmerica Burlington
200-30575-E-16 11/30/2015
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 11/4/2015
Sample ID: RB15-14-SURF Percent Solids: 65.8% Start Date: 11/25/2015
Lab ID: 200-30576-E-1 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/30/2015
Shape (>#10): subangular Non-soil material: shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
.c
.c
d
£
a
a
-O
0—.
>—
0
100000 10000 1000 100 10 1
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
Particle
Percent
Incremental
size
size, um
finer
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
89.9
10.1
#4
4750
79.7
10.2
#10
2000
70.7
9.0
#20
850
67.3
3.4
#40
425
60.6
6.7
#60
250
49.5
11.1
#80
180
37.0
12.5
#100
150
27.3
9.7
#200
75
10.5
16.8
Hyd1
33.7
11.1
-0.6
Hyd2
22.7
5.8
5.3
Hyd3
13.2
4.9
0.9
Hyd4
9.4
4.1
0.9
Hyd5
6.5
3.6
0.4
Hyd6
3.4
2.3
1.3
Hyd7
1.4
2.1
0.2
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
20.3
Sand
69.2
Coarse Sand
9.0
Medium Sand
10.1
Fine Sand
50.1
Silt
6.9
Clay
3.6
TestAmerica Burlington
200-30576-E-1
11/30/2015
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Sample ID:
Lab ID:"
RB15-15-SURF
200-30576-E-2
Percent Solids:
Specific Gravity:
67.3%
2.650
Date Received:
Start Date:
End Date:
11/4/2015
11/25/2015
11/30/2015
Shape (> #10): subangular
Non-soil material: shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
N
\
\
v
\
\
.c
J
*
.0
\
dJ
£
\
\
a
\
a
0
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100000
10000
1000 100
Particle Size, microns (um)
10
Sieve
Particle
Percent
Incremental
size
size, um
finer
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
92.7
7.3
#4
4750
68.7
24.0
#10
2000
60.5
8.2
#20
850
58.2
2.3
#40
425
54.6
3.6
#60
250
45.2
9.4
#80
180
34.1
11.1
#100
150
27.5
6.6
#200
75
14.8
12.7
Hyd1
34.8
9.1
5.7
Hyd2
22.3
8.2
0.9
Hyd3
13.1
6.3
1.9
Hyd4
9.2
5.3
1.0
Hyd5
6.9
4.4
0.9
Hyd6
3.4
3.0
1.4
Hyd7
1.4
2.7
0.2
TestAmerica Burlington
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
31.3
Sand
53.9
Coarse Sand
8.2
Medium Sand
5.9
Fine Sand
39.8
Silt
10.4
Clay
4.4
200-30576-E-2 12/2/2015
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 11/4/2015
Sample ID: RB15-16-SURF Percent Solids: 53.1% Start Date: 11/25/2015
Lab ID: 200-30575-1-14 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/30/2015
Shape (>#10): subangular Non-soil material: shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
Particle
Percent
Incremental
size
size, um
finer
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
71.1
28.9
#4
4750
51.2
19.9
#10
2000
40.1
11.1
#20
850
38.4
1.7
#40
425
35.6
2.8
#60
250
29.4
6.2
#80
180
22.7
6.7
#100
150
18.1
4.6
#200
75
10.5
7.6
Hyd1
35.5
9.1
1.4
Hyd2
22.7
7.9
1.2
Hyd3
13.4
5.5
2.4
Hyd4
9.6
3.7
1.8
Hyd5
6.7
1.9
1.8
Hyd6
3.4
0.7
1.2
Hyd7
1.4
1.0
-0.3
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
48.8
Sand
40.7
Coarse Sand
11.1
Medium Sand
4.5
Fine Sand
25.1
Silt
8.6
Clay
1.9
TestAmerica Burlington
200-30575-1-14 11/30/2015
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 11/4/2015
Sample ID: RB15-17-SURF Percent Solids: 72.7% Start Date: 11/27/2015
Lab ID: 200-30576-E-3 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 12/2/2015
Shape (>#10): subrounded Non-soil material: shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
Particle
Percent
Incremental
size
size, um
finer
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
95.3
4.7
#10
2000
88.1
7.2
#20
850
84.6
3.5
#40
425
82.2
2.4
#60
250
80.0
2.2
#80
180
78.6
1.4
#100
150
77.7
0.9
#200
75
74.5
3.2
Hyd1
23.5
56.6
17.9
Hyd2
15.5
53.4
3.2
Hyd3
9.5
48.6
4.8
Hyd4
7
44.5
4.1
Hyd5
5.2
41.3
3.2
Hyd6
2.7
34.1
7.2
Hyd7
1.2
26.0
8.1
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
4.7
Sand
20.8
Coarse Sand
7.2
Medium Sand
5.9
Fine Sand
7.7
Silt
33.2
Clay
41.3
TestAmerica Burlington
200-30576-E-3 12/2/2015
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 11/3/2015
Sample ID: RB15-18-SURF Percent Solids: 85.1% Start Date: 11/18/2015
Lab ID: 200-30555-E-6 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/25/2015
Shape (>#10): subangular Non-soil material: shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
Particle
Percent
Incremental
size
size, um
finer
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
82.9
17.1
3/8 inch
9500
68.5
14.4
#4
4750
55.9
12.6
#10
2000
46.4
9.5
#20
850
41.1
5.3
#40
425
36.4
4.7
#60
250
27.2
9.2
#80
180
22.3
4.9
#100
150
20.5
1.8
#200
75
19.9
0.6
Hyd1
29.4
15.4
4.5
Hyd2
19.1
14.1
1.3
Hyd3
11.3
12.8
1.3
Hyd4
8.2
11.5
1.3
Hyd5
5.8
9.9
1.6
Hyd6
3
7.6
2.3
Hyd7
1.3
5.6
2.0
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
44.1
Sand
36.0
Coarse Sand
9.5
Medium Sand
10.0
Fine Sand
16.5
Silt
10.0
Clay
9.9
TestAmerica Burlington
200-30555-E-6
11/25/2015
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Sample ID:
Lab ID:"
RB15-19-SURF
200-30576-E-4
Percent Solids:
Specific Gravity:
77.5%
2.650
Date Received:
Start Date:
End Date:
11/4/2015
11/27/2015
12/2/2015
Shape (> #10): subrounded
Non-soil material: shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
\
\
.c
53
£
si
dj
£
d
Qi
—0-
—o—
0-
4-
-0-
—o
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
100000
10000
1000 100
Particle Size, microns (um)
10
Sieve
Particle
Percent
Incremental
size
size, um
finer
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
86.8
13.2
3/8 inch
9500
61.5
25.3
#4
4750
45.7
15.8
#10
2000
39.0
6.7
#20
850
37.0
2.0
#40
425
30.7
6.3
#60
250
13.4
17.3
#80
180
7.6
5.8
#100
150
5.8
1.8
#200
75
3.6
2.2
Hyd1
35.9
3.5
0.0
Hyd2
22.8
3.2
0.3
Hyd3
13.3
2.6
0.6
Hyd4
9.5
2.0
0.6
Hyd5
6.9
1.7
0.3
Hyd6
3.3
1.3
0.3
Hyd7
1.4
0.4
0.9
TestAmerica Burlington
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
54.3
Sand
42.1
Coarse Sand
6.7
Medium Sand
8.3
Fine Sand
27.1
Silt
1.9
Clay
1.7
200-30576-E-4 12/2/2015
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 11/6/2015
Sample ID: RB15-20-SURF Percent Solids: 42.5% Start Date: 11/27/2015
Lab ID: 200-30626-E-1 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 12/3/2015
Shape (>#10): subangular Non-soil material: plant,wood
Hardness (> #10): hard
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
95.5
4.5
#10
2000
92.2
3.3
#20
850
89.3
2.9
#40
425
87.3
2.0
#60
250
84.9
2.4
#80
180
82.1
2.8
#100
150
79.6
2.5
#200
75
69.2
10.4
Hyd1
31
46.4
22.8
Hyd2
20.3
40.2
6.2
Hyd3
12.1
32.7
7.5
Hyd4
8.6
29.0
3.7
Hyd5
6.3
25.3
3.7
Hyd6
3.2
19.0
6.3
Hyd7
1.4
11.5
7.5
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
4.5
Sand
26.3
Coarse Sand
3.3
Medium Sand
4.9
Fine Sand
18.1
Silt
43.9
Clay
25.3
TestAmerica Burlington
200-30626-E-1 12/3/2015
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 11/6/2015
Sample ID: RB15-21-SURF Percent Solids: 74.4% Start Date: 11/27/2015
Lab ID: 200-30626-E-2 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 12/3/2015
Shape (>#10): subangular Non-soil material: plant,wood,shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
97.9
2.1
#4
4750
89.6
8.3
#10
2000
81.8
7.8
#20
850
78.1
3.7
#40
425
74.0
4.1
#60
250
57.1
16.9
#80
180
31.7
25.4
#100
150
19.0
12.7
#200
75
7.9
11.1
Hyd1
35.7
5.8
2.1
Hyd2
22.8
4.9
0.9
Hyd3
13.2
4.4
0.5
Hyd4
9.2
3.9
0.5
Hyd5
6.8
3.0
1.0
Hyd6
3.4
2.5
0.5
Hyd7
1.4
1.5
0.9
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
10.4
Sand
81.7
Coarse Sand
7.8
Medium Sand
7.8
Fine Sand
66.1
Silt
4.9
Clay
3.0
TestAmerica Burlington
200-30626-E-2 12/3/2015
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 11/5/2015
Sample ID: RB15-22-SURF Percent Solids: 51.3% Start Date: 11/27/2015
Lab ID: 200-30593-E-2 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 12/2/2015
Shape (>#10): subrounded Non-soil material: shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
\
\
\
.c
53
£
si
dj
£
d
Qi
100000 10000 1000 100 10 1
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
84.2
15.8
#4
4750
74.9
9.3
#10
2000
70.4
4.5
#20
850
67.9
2.5
#40
425
63.3
4.6
#60
250
53.0
10.3
#80
180
45.4
7.6
#100
150
40.3
5.1
#200
75
29.0
11.3
Hyd1
33.4
18.8
10.2
Hyd2
21.6
15.8
3.0
Hyd3
12.7
13.6
2.2
Hyd4
00
00
10.6
3.0
Hyd5
6.6
8.4
2.2
Hyd6
3.2
6.1
2.2
Hyd7
1.4
3.9
2.2
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
25.1
Sand
45.9
Coarse Sand
4.5
Medium Sand
7.1
Fine Sand
34.3
Silt
20.6
Clay
8.4
TestAmerica Burlington
200-30593-E-2 12/2/2015
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Sample ID:
Lab ID:"
RB15-23-SURF
200-30593-E-3
Percent Solids:
Specific Gravity:
71.5%
2.650
Date Received:
Start Date:
End Date:
11/5/2015
11/27/2015
12/2/2015
Shape (> #10): subrounded
Non-soil material: shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
\
s
\
\
.c
\
J
*
.0
dJ
£
a
a
-o
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
100000
10000
1000 100
Particle Size, microns (um)
10
Sieve
Particle
Percent
Incremental
size
size, um
finer
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
92.3
7.7
3/8 inch
9500
85.5
6.8
#4
4750
62.6
22.9
#10
2000
44.4
18.2
#20
850
37.1
7.3
#40
425
29.1
8.0
#60
250
19.8
9.3
#80
180
15.6
4.2
#100
150
13.8
1.8
#200
75
10.6
3.2
Hyd1
34.8
7.5
3.1
Hyd2
22.3
6.7
0.9
Hyd3
13
5.4
1.3
Hyd4
9.4
4.0
1.3
Hyd5
6.5
3.6
0.4
Hyd6
3.3
2.3
1.3
Hyd7
1.4
1.4
0.9
TestAmerica Burlington
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
37.4
Sand
52.0
Coarse Sand
18.2
Medium Sand
15.3
Fine Sand
18.5
Silt
7.0
Clay
3.6
200-30593-E-3 12/2/2015
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 11/6/2015
Sample ID: RB15-24-SURF Percent Solids: 41.3% Start Date: 11/27/2015
Lab ID: 200-30626-E-3 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 12/3/2015
Shape (>#10): subangular Non-soil material: plant,shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
99.7
0.3
#10
2000
98.8
0.9
#20
850
98.5
0.3
#40
425
98.1
0.4
#60
250
97.4
0.7
#80
180
96.6
0.8
#100
150
95.7
0.9
#200
75
91.2
4.5
Hyd1
27.9
65.2
26.0
Hyd2
18.3
58.9
6.3
Hyd3
11.1
50.2
8.7
Hyd4
8
44.0
6.2
Hyd5
5.9
39.0
5.0
Hyd6
2.9
27.7
11.3
Hyd7
1.3
19.0
8.7
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
0.3
Sand
8.5
Coarse Sand
0.9
Medium Sand
0.7
Fine Sand
6.9
Silt
52.2
Clay
39.0
TestAmerica Burlington
200-30626-E-3 12/3/2015
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 11/6/2015
Sample ID: RB15-25-SURF Percent Solids: 78.6% Start Date: 11/27/2015
Lab ID: 200-30626-E-4 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 12/3/2015
Shape (>#10): subangular Non-soil material: plant,shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
Particle
Percent
Incremental
size
size, um
finer
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
98.7
1.3
#10
2000
98.4
0.3
#20
850
98.2
0.2
#40
425
96.9
1.3
#60
250
85.9
11.0
#80
180
58.5
27.4
#100
150
37.4
21.1
#200
75
3.8
33.7
Hyd1
37.6
0.5
3.3
Hyd2
23.8
0.5
0.0
Hyd3
13.7
0.5
0.0
Hyd4
9.4
0.1
0.4
Hyd5
6.9
0.1
0.0
Hyd6
3.3
0.1
0.0
Hyd7
1.4
-0.3
0.4
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
1.3
Sand
95.0
Coarse Sand
0.3
Medium Sand
1.5
Fine Sand
93.2
Silt
3.7
Clay
0.1
TestAmerica Burlington
200-30626-E-4 12/3/2015
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 11/5/2015
Sample ID: RB15-26-SURF Percent Solids: 91.2% Start Date: 11/27/2015
Lab ID: 200-30593-E-4 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 12/2/2015
Shape (>#10): subangular Non-soil material: shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
73.1
26.9
3/8 inch
9500
35.2
37.9
#4
4750
22.9
12.3
#10
2000
17.9
5.0
#20
850
17.3
0.6
#40
425
17.1
0.2
#60
250
16.8
0.3
#80
180
16.4
0.4
#100
150
16.1
0.3
#200
75
13.3
2.8
Hyd1
33.7
5.5
7.8
Hyd2
22
4.1
1.4
Hyd3
13
3.2
1.0
Hyd4
9.4
2.2
1.0
Hyd5
6.9
1.7
0.5
Hyd6
3.3
1.3
0.5
Hyd7
1.4
0.8
0.5
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
77.1
Sand
9.6
Coarse Sand
5.0
Medium Sand
0.8
Fine Sand
3.8
Silt
11.6
Clay
1.7
TestAmerica Burlington
200-30593-E-4 12/2/2015
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 10/29/2015
Sample ID: RB15-27-SURF Percent Solids: 76.0% Start Date: 11/16/2015
Lab ID: 200-30485-E-3 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/20/2015
Shape (>#10): subangular Non-soil material: plant,shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
91.3
8.7
#4
4750
79.9
11.4
#10
2000
62.4
17.5
#20
850
54.6
7.8
#40
425
47.5
7.1
#60
250
35.6
11.9
#80
180
21.6
14.0
#100
150
14.0
7.6
#200
75
5.4
8.6
Hyd1
36
3.5
2.0
Hyd2
22.9
3.0
0.4
Hyd3
13.3
2.6
0.4
Hyd4
9.5
1.8
0.8
Hyd5
6.8
1.8
0.0
Hyd6
3.3
1.3
0.5
Hyd7
1.4
0.9
0.4
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
20.1
Sand
74.5
Coarse Sand
17.5
Medium Sand
14.9
Fine Sand
42.1
Silt
3.6
Clay
1.8
TestAmerica Burlington
200-30485-E-3 11/27/2015
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 10/29/2015
Sample ID: RB15-28-SURF Percent Solids: 45.1% Start Date: 11/16/2015
Lab ID: 200-30485-E-4 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/20/2015
Shape (>#10): subangular Non-soil material: plant,shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
89.5
10.5
#10
2000
82.8
6.7
#20
850
79.5
3.3
#40
425
76.0
3.5
#60
250
71.8
4.2
#80
180
67.4
4.4
#100
150
64.6
2.8
#200
75
58.8
5.8
Hyd1
27
56.8
2.0
Hyd2
18.9
43.2
13.6
Hyd3
11.4
35.9
7.3
Hyd4
8.5
27.6
8.3
Hyd5
6.3
22.4
5.2
Hyd6
3.1
15.9
6.5
Hyd7
1.3
10.7
5.2
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
10.5
Sand
30.7
Coarse Sand
6.7
Medium Sand
6.8
Fine Sand
17.2
Silt
36.4
Clay
22.4
TestAmerica Burlington
200-30485-E-4 11/20/2015
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 10/29/2015
Sample ID: HBT15-A-SURF Percent Solids: 37.5% Start Date: 11/13/2015
Lab ID: 200-30485-E-1 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/19/2015
Shape (> #10): jia Non-soil material: na
Hardness (> #10): na
-0
—0—
\
\
\
.c
\
v
J
\
*
\
.0
\
dJ
£
a
a
100000 10000 1000 100 10 1
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
Particle
Percent
Incremental
size
size, um
finer
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
100.0
0.0
#4
4750
100.0
0.0
#10
2000
100.0
0.0
#20
850
99.5
0.5
#40
425
98.9
0.6
#60
250
98.0
0.9
#80
180
97.5
0.5
#100
150
94.9
2.6
#200
75
76.6
18.3
Hyd1
31.6
42.4
34.2
Hyd2
20.7
35.3
7.1
Hyd3
12.5
25.7
9.6
Hyd4
9
20.9
4.8
Hyd5
6.4
16.1
4.8
Hyd6
3.3
11.4
4.7
Hyd7
1.4
9.0
2.4
TestAmerica Burlington
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
0.0
Sand
23.4
Coarse Sand
0.0
Medium Sand
1.1
Fine Sand
22.3
Silt
60.5
Clay
16.1
200-30485-E-1 11/27/2015
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 10/29/2015
Sample ID: HBT15-B-SURF Percent Solids: 71.2% Start Date: 11/23/2015
Lab ID: 200-30485-E-2 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/27/2015
Shape (>#10): subangular Non-soil material: shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
94.1
5.9
#4
4750
78.8
15.3
#10
2000
60.3
18.5
#20
850
48.7
11.6
#40
425
41.2
7.5
#60
250
29.3
11.9
#80
180
17.3
12.0
#100
150
12.6
4.7
#200
75
8.6
4.0
Hyd1
35.4
4.0
4.6
Hyd2
22.6
3.4
0.6
Hyd3
13.2
2.8
0.6
Hyd4
9.4
2.5
0.3
Hyd5
6.7
1.9
0.6
Hyd6
3.3
1.0
0.8
Hyd7
1.4
0.6
0.4
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
21.2
Sand
70.2
Coarse Sand
18.5
Medium Sand
19.1
Fine Sand
32.6
Silt
6.8
Clay
1.8
TestAmerica Burlington
200-30485-E-2 11/27/2015
-------
Particle Size of Soils by ASTM D422
Date Received: 11/3/2015
Sample ID: HBT15-C-SURF Percent Solids: 77.2% Start Date: 11/18/2015
Lab ID: 200-30555-E-7 Specific Gravity: 2.650 End Date: 11/25/2015
Shape (>#10): subangular Non-soil material: shell
Hardness (> #10): hard
N
V
9
y
s
V
A
v
\
s
.c
\
53
£
si
dj
£
d
Qi
\
\
\
\
\
V
\>
0=
—0—
0 Q
—I-
Q—-
-0-
6
100000 10000 1000 100 10 1
Particle Size, microns (um)
Sieve
size
Particle
size, um
Percent
finer
Incremental
percent
3 inch
75000
100.0
0.0
2 inch
50000
100.0
0.0
1.5 inch
37500
100.0
0.0
1 inch
25000
100.0
0.0
3/4 inch
19000
100.0
0.0
3/8 inch
9500
89.3
10.7
#4
4750
63.8
25.5
#10
2000
47.4
16.4
#20
850
39.9
7.5
#40
425
33.9
6.0
#60
250
13.2
20.7
#80
180
3.9
9.3
#100
150
2.2
1.6
#200
75
1.3
0.9
Hyd1
37.9
0.6
0.7
Hyd2
24
0.6
0.0
Hyd3
13.8
0.6
0.0
Hyd4
9.8
0.1
0.5
Hyd5
7.1
0.1
0.0
Hyd6
3.4
0.1
0.0
Hyd7
1.4
0.1
0.0
Soil
Classification
Percent of
sample
Gravel
36.2
Sand
62.5
Coarse Sand
16.4
Medium Sand
13.5
Fine Sand
32.6
Silt
1.2
Clay
0.1
TestAmerica Burlington
200-30555-E-7 11/25/2015
-------
This page intentionally left blank
------- |