Summary of 2021 RCRA Corrective Action Economic Benefits Study and Research Methodology The 2021 RCRA economic benefits study provides current, reliable business-related information for a subset of RCRA Corrective Action (CA) sites that are now in either reuse or continued use subsequent to their cleanup and remediation. The project included these primary components: • Identification of RCRA CA sites in reuse and continued use that have on-site activities that support businesses, employ people or generate sales revenues. • Digitization of EPA-approved site boundaries. • Identification of businesses located at the sites using methodology developed for similar research on Superfund sites. • Collection of economic information for site businesses using reputable economic databases and websites. Examples of the types of business information gathered include (but are not limited to): business names and addresses, business type, the number of employees working at the businesses, annual sales revenues and estimated annual employment income. • Quality control/quality assurance (QA/QC) review of economic data collected during the effort. This document includes a summary of the RCRA CA economic information collected in 2021, an overview of the general economic research methodology and a recap of the 2020 economic totals. Table 1 shows the annual economic totals for the 2020 and 2021 RCRA CA economic research efforts. Economic information for the sites researched in 2020 was not updated in 2021. The 35 sites researched in 2021 differ from the 44 sites researched in 2020. Cumulatively, as of October 2021, economic data have been collected for a total of 79 RCRA CA sites. Table 1. RCRA CA Economic Totals (2020-2021) Year Number of Sites Researched with Economic Data3 Number of Businesses Jobs Actual Annual Sales Adjusted Annual Sales b Actual Annual Employment Income Adjusted Annual Employment Income b 2020c 44 724 52,289 $26.9 billion $28.2 billion $5.2 billion $5.5 billion 2021 35 304 30,191 $10.8 billion $10.8 billion $2.4 billion $2.4 billion Notes: a. Included within this study are both federal and non-federal RCRA CA sites. The 35 sites researched in 2021 differ from the 44 sites researched in 2020. b. Adjusted to 2021 U.S. dollars (USD) using the Consumer Price Index (CUUR0000SA0, not seasonally adjusted, U.S. city annual average). c. For reference, Appendix A includes the 2020 site-level economic totals, including actual and inflation-adjusted sales and income totals. l ------- 2021 Project Summary The goal of site selection was to capture a range of different types and sizes of RCRA CA sites. The sites included a mix of those that are in continued use (businesses operated on site throughout cleanup and continue on-site operations following cleanup) and new reuse (reuse/development that happened following cleanup). Some sites support a wide range of uses that result in significant economic activity. More typically, sites support one or a few uses associated with moderate economic activity. Another goal of site selection for this effort was to highlight a mix of those different types of sites - illustrating some of the highest-profile redevelopment successes, as well as capturing sites that represent average reuse/continued use scenarios. The number of RCRA CA sites researched in 2021 represent only a small portion of all RCRA CA sites currently in reuse. Economic benefits associated with sites in continued use highlight how cleanup performed under RCRA CA can facilitate safe, continued operations of long-time on-site businesses, while also protecting human health and the environment through remediation. While many continued use stories and the associated economic impacts may not be considered high profile, they most likely represent the majority of RCRA CA sites that currently support businesses - making them a crucial contributor to the overall economic impacts associated with RCRA CA site use. A few significant examples of sites that are in continued use include John Deere Waterloo Works in EPA Region 7 and IBM Corporation (Poughkeepsie) in EPA Region 2. The John Deere Waterloo Works site is home to three major John Deere facilities - Drive Train Operations, the Foundry and Service Parts Operations. The site also supports some new commercial and public service reuses. Together, businesses operating at the John Deere Waterloo Works site employ over 1,500 people and generate about $655 million in annual sales revenue. The IBM-Poughkeepsie facility employs 4,000 people and generates an estimated $851 million in annual sales. Economic impacts associated with sites in new reuse highlight how cleanup performed under RCRA CA can set the stage for a wide range of new development. New developments can often attract new businesses, bolster the local economy and result in increased property values. In some cases, reuse priorities are incorporated into the remedial design process, resulting in a site cleanup that directly facilitates future reuse. Such sites can serve as models of what is possible when EPA, state entities and site stakeholders work together to address site cleanup and consider reuse priorities early in the cleanup process. A few examples of high-profile RCRA CA sites that support new reuse include RACER Moraine in EPA Region 5 and the Duke Bait Vice General Motors Baltimore Assembly site in EPA Region 3. Today, the former General Motors plant known as the RACER Moraine site is home to Progress Park. The business park houses a wide range of industries, including Fuyao Glass, the second largest automotive glass manufacturer in the world, and engine manufacturer DMAX. Together, site businesses at RACER Moraine employ 2,750 people and generate nearly $905 million in annual sales revenue. The Duke Bait Vice General Motors Baltimore Assembly site is now home to two large Amazon fulfillment centers and other new uses. Together, site businesses employ over 2,700 people and generate an estimated $1 billion in annual sales. Table 2 lists site-specific economic totals for the 35 RCRA CA sites researched in 2021. 2 ------- Table 2. 2021 Site-Level RCRA CA Economic Totals Site Name EPA Region Number of Businesses Jobs Annual Sales Annual Employment Income Austin-Bergstrom Airport (Former Bergstrom AFB) 6 78 3,902 $274,802,021 $118,265,836 BASF Agricultural Products of Puerto Rico 2 1 150 $115,000,000 $14,024,400 BASF Corp. (Wyandotte) 5 3 1,232 $1,342,821,787 $86,333,988 BASF Freeport 6 1 900 $861,226,000 $92,757,600 Bristol Metals LLC 4 1 400 $194,000,000 $21,403,200 Colonial Bronze Company 1 1 55 $8,700,000 $3,231,800 Duke Bait Vice General Motors Baltimore Assembly 3 4 2,724 $1,018,942,857 $191,596,496 Encycle Texas 6 1 NA NA NA Ethyl Capitol Products Corporation 3 5 304 $58,938,000 $9,713,496 Exelon Corp. (Chem Clear Incorporated) 3 9 601 $101,334,939 $49,494,068 Fisher Scientific 2 1 20 $23,714,000 $2,061,280 Florida Tile Inc. 4 2 184 $19,757,000 $10,369,216 Former Appliance Park East (General Electric Company) 3 10 103 $9,975,596 $5,985,044 Former Kelly AFB 6 60 2,764 $677,767,994 $217,361,248 Former Lawrence Nitrogen Plant 7 1 NA NA NA Harley-Davidson Motor Company Incorporated 3 2 1,070 $782,297,436 $80,806,440 Henniges Automotive Iowa Inc. 7 1 500 $60,000,000 $24,440,000 Hutchinson Sealing Systems 1 1 150 $117,166,000 $8,314,800 IBM Corporation (Manassas) 3 9 1,445 $659,010,000 $190,062,392 IBM Corporation (Poughkeepsie) 2 1 4,000 $851,344,319 $670,592,000 INVISTA Seaford Plant 3 2 200 $135,447,000 $25,292,800 John Deere Waterloo Works - Drivetrain Operations 7 12 1,509 $654,666,000 $116,231,856 Kelly-Springfield Tire Company 3 10 411 $28,744,000 $17,247,516 Martinsville DuPont 3 3 42 $246,000 a $2,697,708 Microsemi Consortium Facility/Microsemi Consortium 8 1 NA NA NA ------- Site Name EPA Region Number of Businesses Jobs Annual Sales Annual Employment Income Naval Weapons Industrial Reserve Plant (NWIRP) Dallas 6 4 562 $161,438,294 $18,508,412 Nutrien Ag Solutions 7 1 20 $1,855,000 $740,480 Orbital ATK (Formerly: Alliant Techsystems Operations LLC) 3 2 150 $54,046,299 $19,589,232 Pfizer Inc. 1 5 2,713 $1,410,548,669 $201,857,812 RACER Moraine 5 12 2,750 $904,758,263 $147,396,860 Seagate Technology (Formerly Imprimis) 7 1 4 $390,423 $130,832 Sentinel Industries, Inc. 6 1 12 $5,744,000 $600,912 The Chemours Company 4 2 60 $17,438,596 $4,804,280 U.S. Electrical Motors 4 2 NA NA NA Viasystems Technologies Corporation 3 54 1,254 $237,308,000 $32,769,308 Totals 304 30,191 $10,789,428,493 $2,384,681,312 Notes: a. While sales values typically exceed estimated totals of annual employment income, annual reported sales can sometimes be lower than estimated annual income. This atypical condition of estimated income exceeding sales can be a result of business type (i.e., government entities that do not generate sales revenue), business conditions, estimated business wages not accurately reflecting actual wages for the site-specific business, annual sales being under-reported, a business loss for the year or a combination of those factors. NA = not available. Sites that have NA in economic total columns indicate that economic information for the confirmed site business(es) could not be found. Some factors that contributed to the 2021 RCRA CA economic totals are discussed below. Availability of Reuse Information Through Site Visits and Online Sources Most business data are obtained from reputable economic information databases, such as Dunn & Bradstreet/Hoovers and ReferenceUSA (now Reference Solutions). In some cases, economic research will confirm that a specific business operates on site (for example, a business website or site visit will confirm an on-site location); however, online economic data sources may not report business information for that business. In those cases, the business will be captured as a site business, but economic data will not be included. This is an example of how data availability through online sources can impact the ability to capture economic information for site businesses. Economic Business Conditions Broader national and regional economic conditions affecting businesses are usually independent of site- related factors, such as cleanup and redevelopment efforts. However, such independent economic conditions can sometimes play a major role in the economic activity at sites. The 2021 RCRA CA economic 4 ------- totals provide a snapshot in time of economic activities at the selected subset of sites - an economic baseline. Overview of Economic Research Methodology EPA worked with the regions to identify sites that would be appropriate for this study. Appropriate sites include those that have been subject to RCRA CA and have on-site activities that support businesses, employ people or generate sales revenues. The goal of site selection was to capture a range of different types and sizes of RCRA CA sites, including a mix of those that are in continued use and new reuse, those that support a wide range of uses and those that support one or a few uses associated with moderate economic activity. Economic research focuses solely on areas within EPA-established site boundaries. Site boundaries used for economic research were either provided by the respective EPA regions or obtained from EPA's Cleanups in My Community website. In cases where the regions provided site boundary figures, GIS was used to digitize the site boundaries to facilitate economic research. EPA regions approved all sites selected for 2021 economic research. Digitized site boundaries are overlaid on aerial maps to facilitate the identification of site businesses. Google aerial imagery and streetview images of site areas allow researchers to accurately identify site uses. Site businesses can also be identified through existing documents that highlight site reuse, such as case studies and fact sheets, and through online business directories. Economic information is then collected for site businesses using economic databases and websites. Examples of the types of business information gathered include but are not limited to: business names and addresses, business type, the number of employees working at the businesses, annual sales revenues and estimated annual employment income. The primary economic data information sources used include the Dun & Bradstreet (Hoovers) and Reference Solutions economic databases, the Manta website, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) website (used to obtain wage information to calculate income estimates), business publications (such as annual reports) and online research (including business websites and news articles). The economic databases have tools that are used to help identify all businesses located within the site boundaries (for example, the databases can identify all businesses located at a confirmed on-site address). The economic research process emphasizes the use of conservative economic values and QA/QC review. Multiple rounds of QA/QC review were completed. A routine step in the collection of economic data is to track the source of each piece of data for every business operating at each site. The tracking of data source information allows for additional value verification, if needed. In some cases, PDF copies of data sources are created and saved to further support key pieces of data (such as businesses with over 500 employees or over $1 billion in sales). For large values like those, all attempts are made to identify additional supporting information to confirm those larger values. QA/QC review is performed for site- level and business-level data and involves going back through the research process steps to check the accuracy of each piece of economic information. Business-level economic data include information for individual site businesses. Site-level economic data are a summation of available business-level data for a given site. Currently, the QA/QC review process involves reviewing economic information for each site. 5 ------- Moving forward, as the number of sites researched increases, a percentage of sites will be reviewed. For sites that support large numbers of businesses, a percentage of site businesses are reviewed. The final QA/QC review phase includes an overarching review of the entire economic data set. All business-level and site-level economic data are compiled in order to identify outliers, minimum, maximum and median values for each type of value, and to make sure the values are appropriate. All large economic values are reviewed for accuracy and to ensure the documentation of supporting evidence to confirm the large values. Documentation of QA/QC review steps is saved for future reference. Following identification of all site businesses and QA/QC review, economic totals for the individual businesses are added to calculate site-level economic totals. Following completion of economic research at all sites, site-level economic totals are added to calculate an estimate of the national beneficial economic effects associated with the cleanup and reuse of RCRA CA sites. Conclusion The 2021 RCRA CA economic research effort enabled the capture of business data and reuse information for a subset of RCRA CA sites in reuse and continued use. The results of the project quantify some of the economic benefits associated with both new and long-time businesses operating at remediated RCRA CA sites across the nation. Looking forward, options exist to expand on the initial 2020 and 2021 economic research efforts, including updating business information for the sites researched to date and expansion of the number of sites researched. Future research efforts would also facilitate the tracking of site business data and reuse information over time. Appendix A includes the 2020 site-level economic totals, including actual and inflation-adjusted sales and income totals. 6 ------- Appendix A - 2020 Site-Level RCRA CA Economic Totals Site Name Number of Businesses Jobs Actual Annual Salesa Adjusted Annual Salesb Actual Annual Employment Income Adjusted Annual Employment Incomeb Chevron Oil Co @ Perth Amboy Refinery 3 123 $149,287,000 $156,300,537 $12,250,056 $12,825,566 Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp 1 4,000 $1,828,358,065 $1,914,254,745 $802,048,000 $839,728,399 Sparrows Point Terminal LLC 18 3,320 $1,039,444,500 $1,088,277,840 $143,108,316 $149,831,577 DC Department of Corrections (Formerly: Lorton Correctional Complex) 23 482 $19,466,000 $20,380,517 $20,998,692 $21,985,215 Edgewater Steel Company 6 17 $2,152,000 $2,253,101 $1,419,548 $1,486,239 Willow Run Arsenal of Democracy Landholdings LP 1 10 $787,000 $823,973 $983,320 $1,029,517 Former Allison Plant 2 / Speedway Redevelopment Commission 3 32 $1,218,000 $1,275,222 $1,292,200 $1,352,908 Ml Concourse LLC (formerly Pontiac Center Point) 1 14 $208,000 $217,772 $403,312 $422,260 Syngenta Crop Protection 6 1,008 $222,203,679 $232,642,859 $112,538,660 $117,825,752 Polaroid Corp. DBA 12 629 $165,862,500 $173,654,758 $32,865,664 $34,409,700 Yarde Metals 1 425 $165,316,045 $173,082,631 $24,398,400 $25,544,642 General Dynamics Armament & Tech Product 10 154 $8,744,000 $9,154,795 $11,878,724 $12,436,789 U S M Machinery Division 220 2,423 $343,247,534 $359,373,382 $206,209,900 $215,897,688 American Hoist & Derrick Co. 9 213 $34,832,286 $36,468,715 $15,496,780 $16,224,822 Waterbury Brownfields Redev. LLC 5 18 $2,268,000 $2,374,551 $956,280 $1,001,206 Revere Transducers Inc. 4 227 $100,365,000 $105,080,171 $4,842,188 $5,069,675 UTC Fire and Security Americas Corporation, Inc. 1 400 NA NA $19,427,200 $20,339,894 A-l ------- Site Name Number of Businesses Jobs Actual Annual Salesa Adjusted Annual Salesb Actual Annual Employment Income Adjusted Annual Employment Incomeb Sulfco (Former Tronox Pigments Site) 6 43 $4,388,000 $4,594,149 $3,856,632 $4,037,817 First Chemical Corporation 2 135 $1,500,000 $1,570,470 $11,526,840 $12,068,374 Chevron Products Company 1 3,312 $10,368,022,561 $10,855,114,633 $401,970,816 $420,855,497 MOOG Components Group (fka Litton Systems Inc, Clifton Precision) 1 400 $89,263,000 $93,456,596 $30,305,600 $31,729,364 Former GM/Delphi Energy and Engine / Anderson Redevelopment Commission 6 46 $7,849,000 $8,217,748 $2,533,804 $2,652,843 Gates Rubber Co 1 2 $162,000 $169,611 $183,976 $192,619 McDonald AY Disposal Site - Former Site of 3 53 $20,892,000 $21,873,511 $2,985,788 $3,126,061 Nucor Corporation (Nucor Steel - Nebraska) 3 463 $224,835,606 $235,398,434 $41,546,388 $43,498,247 Ninigret Technologies Park, LC. 45 1,219 $314,079,601 $328,835,133 $71,743,568 $75,114,097 BP Casper Former Refinery 34 244 $69,920,658 $73,205,547 $15,899,728 $16,646,701 GTE Operations Support Incorporated (OSI) 2 11 $1,548,000 $1,620,725 $743,912 $778,861 Tyco Electronics (TE Connectivity) 1 2,800 $3,768,066,395 $3,945,091,016 $374,483,200 $392,076,506 Safety Kleen Systems Inc. Lynnwood 709201 2 4 $1,780,000 $1,863,625 $357,136 $373,914 Safety Kleen Systems Inc. Auburn 118101 7 34 $6,426,000 $6,727,895 $2,205,424 $2,309,035 Honeywell Baltimore Inner Harbor 18 2,597 $2,487,867,073 $2,604,747,637 $486,590,260 $509,450,382 U.S. Steel Corporation MVW Fairless Works 32 901 $905,094,368 $947,615,909 $62,281,596 $65,207,600 A-2 ------- Site Name Number of Businesses Jobs Actual Annual Salesa Adjusted Annual Sales b Actual Annual Employment Income Adjusted Annual Employment Incomeb Remington Arms Company, LLC 2 1,001 $384,890,000 $402,972,220 $54,630,420 $57,196,970 Union Pacific Railroad 21 365 $51,088,520 $53,488,670 $10,436,504 $10,926,813 Clean Harbors Arizona 1 20 $80,946 $84,749 $1,257,360 $1,316,431 Onyx Environmental Services 1 25 $1,900,000 $1,989,262 $1,205,100 $1,261,716 Fairchild Republic Co. 27 1,010 $201,591,222 $211,062,024 $44,152,576 $46,226,874 Brooks City-Base (Former Brooks AFB) 86 1,322 $293,157,156 $306,929,746 $72,443,436 $75,846,845 EEIDD (Former England Air Force Base) 19 327 $75,870,077 $79,434,471 $14,327,924 $15,001,053 U.S. Naval Weapons Industrial Reserve Plant (NWIRP) McGregor 8 1,198 $136,166,216 $142,563,336 $101,264,332 $106,021,753 General Services Administration 46 5,374 $48,139,630 $50,401,241 $714,020,580 $747,565,430 Volunteer Army Ammunition Plant 18 8,111 $2,907,880,404 $3,044,493,291 $551,392,660 $577,297,213 Denver Federal Center 7 7,777 $431,287,000 $451,548,962 $760,397,924 $796,121,592 Totals 724 52,289 $26,887,505,042 $28,150,686,181 $5,245,860,724 $5,492,312,461 Notes: a. While sales values typically exceed estimated totals of annual employment income, annual reported sales can sometimes be lower than estimated annual income. This atypical condition of estimated income exceeding sales can be a result of business type (i.e., government entities that do not generate sales revenue), business conditions, estimated business wages not accurately reflecting actual wages for the site-specific business, annual sales being under-reported, a business loss for the year or a combination of those factors. b. Adjusted to 2021 U.S. dollars (USD) using the Consumer Price Index (CUUR0000SA0, not seasonally adjusted, U.S. city annual average). Site-level adjusted sales and income values in the above table are rounded to the nearest dollar. Totals presented in this summary may not sum exactly due to rounding. NA = not available. A-3 ------- |