Operating efficiently and effectively

Infrastructure Investment and
Jobs Act Progress Report—
Year One

March 29, 2023


-------
To find out more about the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of
Inspector General activities related to the Infrastructure Investment and
Jobs Act, visit our website.

Report Contributors:

Jason Elkins
Chad Garland
Eric Lewis
Claire McWilliams
Adam Seefeldt

Abbreviations:	EPA	U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

IIJA	Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act

OIG	Office of Inspector General

Pub. L.	Public Law

Cover Image:	The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act will help fund water infrastructure

projects, cleanup and recycling efforts, and school buses with reduced diesel
emissions. (EPA OIG image)

Are you aware of fraud, waste, or abuse in an
EPA program?

EPA Inspector General Hotline

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW (2431T)
Washington, D.C. 20460
(888) 546-8740
(202) 566-2599 (fax)

OIG Hotline@epa.gov

Learn more about our OIG Hotline.

EPA Office of Inspector General

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW (2410T)
Washington, D.C. 20460
(202) 566-2391
www.epa.gov/oiq

Subscribe to our Email Updates.
Follow us on Twitter @EPAoig.
Send us your Project Suggestions.


-------
Foreword

On November 15, 2021, President Joseph R. Biden Jr. signed the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act into law.
The IIJA appropriates over $60 billion to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for fiscal years 2022 through
2026, representing the largest appropriation that the Agency has ever received. This report summarizes the
efforts of the EPA's Office of Inspector General to provide oversight over the execution of IIJA funding to date.

Supplemental appropriations to the EPA under the IIJA more than double the Agency's typical annual
appropriations for each year of the five-year period from FY 2022 through 2026. The Act provides no-year
funding for significant investments in drinking water, wastewater, and stormwater infrastructure projects;
environmental cleanups; clean school buses; and increases in the EPA workforce. It also appropriates funds to
the OIG, most of which are available until expended, which is consistent with the actual life cycle of oversight
work. Accordingly, we plan to use the funds for at least six years beyond FY 2026. The Agency has described this
as a "moment for the Agency to expand from its historic role as a regulatory and scientific agency to be a large-
scale funder of critical infrastructure."1

Shortly after the Act's passage, the OIG began preparing and executing on several oversight fronts. An internal
working group was established to help the mission and support offices hire additional staff to meet the
increased oversight workload. In April 2022, the OIG released its inaugural Infrastructure Investment and Jobs
Act Oversight Plan that identified planned and ongoing oversight projects. It identified planned and ongoing
lessons-learned reports meant to help the EPA administer IIJA funding for its various programs. As the EPA
refines its plan to execute the Act, we expect to also adapt our oversight plan, with the goal that the Agency,
Congress, and the American public have a timely guide to our oversight.

In October 2022, we issued The EPA's Fiscal Year 2023 Top Management Challenges, adding a new challenge,
Managing Increased Investment in Infrastructure, that is focused on providing oversight for EPA programs
receiving IIJA funds and on detecting and preventing fraud, waste, and abuse. In March 2023, we issued our
Compendium of Open and Unresolved Recommendations Related to Infrastructure and Investment Jobs Act-
Funded Programs, identifying open and unresolved recommendations issued in previous OIG reporting related
to EPA programs receiving IIJA funds. The OIG has also been leveraging its data analytics team to collect and
analyze large and disparate data sets to support ongoing audits, evaluations, and investigations meant to detect
and prevent fraud, waste, abuse, or mismanagement of EPA IIJA funded programs.

Outreach has also been an important part of our efforts since the Act was signed into law. As of February 28,
2023, our investigators and auditors have conducted 168 joint IIJA fraud briefings, reaching more than
3,700 attendees, including EPA staff members, potential grant recipients, and state environmental agencies,
among other stakeholders. We have also conducted several other outreach activities across offices, such as
meeting with the Agency, other OIGs, state officials, the U.S. Government Accountability Office, and Congress.
The Agency faces several challenges related to the IIJA, and we will continue to dedicate significant effort in the
future to ensuring that the EPA uses its IIJA funds efficiently and effectively.

Sean W. O'Donnell
Inspector General

1 U.S. Envtl. Protection Agency, 190R22005, Year One Anniversary Report, Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (2022).


-------
Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act Progress Report—

Year One

Table of Contents

The IIJA Provides the EPA with $60 Billion	1

The IIJA Supports the OIG's Mission to Conduct Oversight and Review	3

The OIG Notes Its IIJA-Related Spending and Hiring Efforts to Date	4

The OIG's Infrastructure Oversight Work	5

The OIG Conducts Outreach to Help Deter Fraud and Improve Efficiency	10

The OIG Leverages Data Analysis to Detect Grant and Contract Fraud	11

The OIG Identifies Continuing Challenges for the Agency	11


-------
The IIJA Provides the EPA with $60 Billion

The purpose of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs
Act, as it applies to the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, is to advance public health and safety by
improving the nation's drinking water, wastewater, and
stormwater infrastructure; cleaning up legacy pollution;
investing in healthier air; increasing the Agency's
workforce; and enhancing the country's climate resilience.
To achieve this purpose, the Act appropriates over
$60 billion to the EPA from fiscal year 2022 through 2026,
comprising 19 appropriations, largely to existing
programs, such as the state revolving funds and
Superfund. For most programs, these funds are available
until expended. The IIJA's appropriations represent a
significant increase in funding for the EPA, whose annual
appropriations ranged from about $7.9 billion to
$9.6 billion from FY 2013 through 2022.2 Of the $60 billion
IIJA appropriation, about 91 percent is allocated for state
and tribal grants; 3 percent for environmental programs
and management; and 6 percent for Superfund sites.

Table 1 shows the EPA's expected IIJA appropriations by
program.

From top to bottom: Superfund site, people
walking in a neighborhood, and EPA workforce.
(EPA photos)

2 This excludes FY 2022 funding appropriated to the EPA through the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, Pub. L.
No. 117-169 (2022).

1


-------
Table 1: IIJA funding by program

$60 billion
in IIJA
funding

State and tribal grants

Clean Water State Revolving
Fund Traditional

$11.713B

Drinking Water State
Revolving Fund Traditional

$11.713B

Lead Service Lines Drinking
Water State Revolving Fund

$15B

PFAS Clean Water State
Revolving Fund

$1B

PFAS Drinking Water State
Revolving Fund

$4B

PFAS Small & Disadvantaged

$5B

Underground Injection
Control Grants

$50M

Brownfields

$1.5B

Save Our Seas 2.0

$275M

Pollution Prevention

$100M

RECYCLE Act

$75M

Clean School Buses

$5B

Environmental programs
and management

Geographic programs

S1.717B

National Estuary
program

$132M

Gulf of Mexico and
Mississippi and Ohio
Rivers Hypoxia

$60M

Class VI

Wells/Underground
Injection Control

$25M

Battery Recycling
Labeling

$15M

Battery Recycling Best
Practices

$10M

Superfund

Remedial
cleanups

Total:

$3.5B
$3.5B

Total: $1.959B

Total: $55.426B

Notes: B = Billion; M = Million; PFAS = Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances.

Source: EPA, FACT SHEET: EPA & The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, November 6, 2021. (EPA OIG table)

2


-------
As of February 28, 2023, the EPA has obligated approximately 12 percent of its IIJA funds; however, less
than 1 percent of the $60 billion in IIJA funds had been expended. Table 2 shows the EPA's obligations
and outlays as of February 28, 2023.

Table 2: EPA IIJA obligations and outlays
from inception through February 28, 2023

Description

Amount

EPA obligations

$7.5 billion

Percent of obligations to appropriations

12%

EPA outlays

$555 million

Percent of outlays to appropriations

<1%

Source: OIG analysis of EPA financial data.
(EPA OIG table)

The EPA expects to see an increase in IIJA activity at year 2 of the IIJA. Specifically, the EPA's Year One
Anniversary Report, Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, dated November 2022, states that in year 2, the EPA
expects:

•	To provide $1 billion for the Clean School Bus program.

•	All states and territories to have received state revolving fund IIJA capitalization grants and for
construction to have begun on many projects.

•	The EPA's geographic and estuary programs to deploy nearly all FY 2022 and FY 2023 resources
to support state and local projects and initiatives.

•	Superfund construction projects to be funded and National Priorities List sites to have new
construction projects ready to be started in FY 2023, which were announced in February 2023.

•	To award $240 million in Brownfields revolving loan fund, cleanup assessment, and technical
assistance grants and approximately $60 million in state tribal and response program grants.

•	To announce the availability of $140 million in funding the solid waste infrastructure and
recycling education and outreach grant programs to states, tribes, territories, and local
governments.

•	The pollution prevention program to announce two new competitive grant opportunities that
will focus intensively on advancing environmental justice and addressing climate impacts.

The IIJA Supports the OIG's Mission to Conduct Oversight and Review

The Office of Inspector General is an independent office of the EPA charged with promoting efficiency
and economy in Agency operations and detecting and preventing fraud, waste, abuse, mismanagement,
or misconduct related to the EPA's programs and operations. For FYs 2022 through 2026, the IIJA
provides the OIG with 0.44 percent of the EPA's total supplemental appropriation, most of which is
available until expended—commonly referred to as "no-year" funds—for oversight of the Agency's
IIJA-funded programs and operations.

As part of its IIJA oversight role, the OIG will assess whether the EPA is using its roughly $60 billion in IIJA
funds in accordance with congressionally designated purposes. OIG oversight will focus on the execution
of IIJA funds, the efficiency and effectiveness of the programs receiving IIJA funds, and the detection and
prevention of fraud, waste, and abuse. We will do this by leveraging data analytics to develop proactive

3


-------
fraud detection methodologies, allowing us to target our audits, evaluations, and investigation on
high-risk programs and recipients.

The OIG Notes Its IIJA-Related Spending and Hiring Efforts to Date

As of February 28, 2023, the OIG obligated
approximately $5.5 million and expended
approximately $5.3 million, less than 2 percent of its
total appropriated IIJA funds. The no-year IIJA funds
allow us the flexibility to ramp up our resources to
perform adequate oversight and to observe the
EPA's IIJA implementation across several years to
perform responsive, effective oversight.

The OIG resource plan is based on planned EPA IIJA
activity. Strategic hiring of specific foundational
positions was the focus of year 1. The plan allows for a ramp-up/ramp-down approach following the
audit and evaluation life cycle expanding ten to 13 years. In years 1 and 2, we will prepare, research, and
publish initial capping reports and lessons learned. In years 3 through 11, we will assess the EPA's IIJA
execution. In years 12 and 13, we will ramp down by performing lessons learned, archiving, and
reporting, with temporary staff departing. While we originally envisioned continuing to ramp up hiring
of IIJA-specific personnel over the next several years, we currently plan to track the size of our IIJA-
specific work force with the timing and amount of IIJA oversight needs we observe from Agency activity.
At present, this means hiring fewer IIJA-specific personnel than we previously anticipated during FYs
2023 and 2024. Table 3 provides an overview of the EPA OIG's full-time equivalents charging to IIJA
funds as of February 28, 2023.

Table 3: EPA OIG's IIJA full-time equivalents
as of February 28, 2023

Office

IIJA FTEs*

Office of Audit

9.3

Office of Special Review and Evaluation

10.7

Office of Investigations

8.6

Support Office Activities**

13.2

Total

41.8

Note: FTE = Full-Time Equivalent.

Source: EPA OIG data as of February 28, 2023. (EPA OIG table)

*IIJA FTE numbers reflect the total number of FY 2023 hours
charged to IIJA funds by all OIG personnel for each activity,
divided by the number of compensable hours corresponding
to an FTE in a pay period (80), divided by the number of
completed FY 2023 pay periods as of February 28, 2023 (10).

"""Support Office Activities include the OIG Immediate Office,
Office of Mission Support, Office of Strategic Analysis and
Results, Office of Information Technology, Office of Counsel,
and Office of Congressional and Public Affairs.

Image depicting IIJA full-time equivalent hiring.
(USAJOBS.gov and EPA OIG images)

4


-------
The OIG's Infrastructure Oversight Work

The OIG's oversight work in the first year of the
lIJA focused on planning and preparing for audit
and evaluation work regarding the execution of
lIJA funds; the efficiency and effectiveness of
the programs receiving ILIA funds; and the
detection and prevention of fraud, waste, and
abuse. It also focused on leveraging data
analytics to develop proactive fraud detection
methodologies, allowing us to target our audits,
evaluations, and investigation on high-risk
programs and recipients. Beginning in early
2022, the OIG created an internal biweekly
workforce enhancement working group that
was initially focused on strategies for increasing
staff and lIJA oversight planning for the next five and ten years. The working group has transitioned to
focus on project coordination, overall lIJA program management, outreach strategies, reporting, and
tracking ILIA appropriations to determine how to best allocate the OIG's audit and investigative
resources. Additionally, the OIG created subject matter work groups at the executive, director, and staff
levels that are charged with sharing insights into program development and ensuring that infrastructure
oversight is relevant. Infrastructure challenges are developed at the staff level and defined and
approved at the director and executive levels to produce infrastructure oversight projects.

The OIG's initial ILIA oversight work began with lessons-learned reports. These are agile reports that
summarize previous OIG report findings that are applicable to current IIJA-funded programs. As part of
the OIG's IIJA annual planning, five projects are in the planning phase and four are ongoing. Since the
passage of the lIJA, we have identified two issued reports, three ongoing projects, and one planned
project related to IIJA-funded programs. Although those reports and projects are not planned as part of
the OIG's I IJ A oversight and are not fully funded by I IJ A appropriations, they are relevant to IIJA-funded
programs. Our planning efforts are not static, and we may modify or identify additional planned projects
in response to emerging challenges, crises, and priorities.

Great Lakes sunset on an EPA research vessel. This
image represents the OIG follow-up review, Lessons
Identified from Prior Oversight of the EPA's Geographic
and National Estuary Programs. (EPA image)

5


-------
vs- IIJA-Funded Projects Completed Since the IIJA Was Enacted

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Findings for Consideration in the
Implementation of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act

We issued this report, Report No. 23-iN~0Q04, on
December 7, 2022. In November 2021, the IIJA
provided funding for many EPA programs. Many
of these same programs received funds in 2009
under the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act. The OIG issued various
reports on EPA programs that received funds
under the Act. The OIG initiated this review to
identify findings from those reports and
develop lessons that may help the Agency
prepare, implement, and oversee programs receiving IIJA appropriations. Through our analysis, we
developed three lessons that the EPA should consider to mitigate risks and reduce the likelihood of
fraud, waste, and abuse of IIJA funds: (1) ensure that federal requirements are met; (2) provide clear
and comprehensive guidance; and (3) improve project management, monitoring, and data verification.

Considerations from Single Audit Reports for the EPA's Administration of Infrastructure
Investment and Jobs Act Funds

We issued this report, Report No. 22-N-0057. on September 14, 2022. We identified seven areas where
noncompliance with applicable federal laws, regulations, and program requirements were most
frequent: (1) procurement and suspension and debarment, (2) reporting, (3) allowable costs/cost
principles, (4) cash management, (5) activities allowable or unallowable, (6) special tests and provisions,
and (7) subrecipient monitoring. We found that most instances of noncompliance were associated with
two programs: the Clean Water State Revolving Fund program and the Drinking Water State Revolving
Fund program. As the EPA awards IIJA funds to state revolving fund and other programs, the Agency
should consider how it can address or prevent future instances of noncompliance within these
programs. Consideration of these past findings could help the EPA decrease the risk of fraud, waste, and
abuse as it implements the IIJA.

Considerations for the EPA's Implementation of Grants Awarded Pursuant to the
Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act

We issued this report, Report No. 22- I ¦305.5. on August 11, 2022. We initiated this review to highlight
findings from prior OIG and U.S. Government Accountability Office audit reports that are relevant to the
EPA's administration and oversight of grants awarded pursuant to the IIJA. We found three areas for
improvement for the EPA to consider as it prepares to administer and oversee IIJA grants: (1) enhance
the grants oversight workforce and strengthen monitoring and reporting; (2) establish and implement
comprehensive guidance and detailed work plans, as well as improve communications; and (3) require
adequate documentation to support grant payments. This report highlights grants administration and
oversight deficiencies that the Agency should consider to mitigate risks and reduce the likelihood of
fraud, waste, and abuse.

Images from OIG reports on American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act funds. (EPA OIG images)

6


-------
Lessons Identified from Prior Oversight of the EPA's Geographic and National Estuary
Programs

We issued this report, Report No. 22-E-0054, on August 8, 2022. We reviewed prior oversight reports
and identified lessons to help the EPA administer $1.85 billion in IIJA funds for its 12 geographic
programs and National Estuary Program. We observed seven programmatic themes: (1) measurement
of progress, (2) communication, (3) grant management, (4) strategic planning, (5) leadership,

(6) program execution, and (7) resources. As the EPA begins to distribute IIJA funds to geographic
programs and the National Estuary Program, the Agency can use this information to address historical
challenges and better position itself to achieve its programmatic goals and improve its environmental
outcomes.

v*- Projects Completed Related to IIJA-Funded Programs

Brownfields Program-Income Monitoring Deficiencies Persist Because the EPA Did Not
Complete All Certified Corrective Actions

We issued this follow-up report, Report No. 22-P-0033, on March 31, 2022. We determined whether the
corrective actions taken by the EPA effectively addressed the identified program deficiencies in OIG
Report No. 17-P-0368, Improved Management of the Brownfields Revolving Loan Program Is Required to
Maximize Cleanups, issued August 23, 2017. We found that the EPA continues to lack current, accurate,
and complete data necessary for effective post-closeout reporting of the Brownfields Revolving Loan
Program. The OIG made six new recommendations, for which the Agency provided acceptable corrective
actions. This audit was not funded using the OIG's IIJA appropriations, but the Brownfields Revolving
Loan Program is receiving $1.5 billion in IIJA appropriations.

The EPA Did Not Follow Agency Policies in Managing the Northbridge Contract and
Potentially Violated Appropriations Law

We issued this report, Report No. 22-E-0027. on March 31, 2022. We determined whether (1) the EPA
properly approved, paid, and accounted for charges submitted by Northbridge for work in Region 9 for
the states of Hawaii and California, and (2) Northbridge provided timely and acceptable deliverables, as
specified in the contract and associated work plans. This contract provided support services to states for
their municipal drinking water and wastewater programs. While this evaluation was not funded using
the OIG's IIJA appropriations, the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund and Clean Water State Revolving
Fund programs are receiving a cumulative $43.4 billion in IIJA appropriations.

While we confirmed that Northbridge provided acceptable deliverables in Region 9, EPA contracting
officers did not follow established acquisition guidance to review and track the completion of these
deliverables. Therefore, prior to our assessment, the EPA had no reasonable assurance that Northbridge
met performance expectations. The EPA agreed with our three recommendations.

O Ongoing IIJA-Funded Projects

Audit of the EPA's Clean School Bus Program

We issued the project notification, Project No. QA-FY23-0051, on February 27, 2023. Our objective is to
determine whether potential supply chain or production delays could impact the EPA's efforts to
disburse and manage clean school bus program funds pursuant to the IIJA.

7


-------
Audit of the EPA's Oversight of the Clean Water State Revolving Fund

We issued the project notification, Project No. QA-FY23-0047. on February 23, 2023. Our objective is to
determine whether the EPA is prepared to oversee IIJA funds invested in the Clean Water State
Revolving Funds through the EPA's annual review process.

Audit of the EPA's Fiscal Year 2022 Public Reporting of IIJA Financial and Award Data

We issued the project notification, Project No. QA-FY23-0046, on February 21, 2023. Our objective is to
determine whether the EPA's reporting of FY 2022 IIJA obligations and outlays in USAspending.gov is
complete and accurate.

Evaluation of Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Agencies' Perspectives on Their
Capacity to Manage Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act Funds

We issued the project notification, Project No. QSRE-FY23-0043. on February 2, 2023. Our objectives are
to identify Drinking Water State Revolving Fund agencies' perspectives on their capacity to manage IIJA
funds and obstacles that Drinking Water State Revolving Fund agencies' administrators believe limit
their capacity to manage IIJA funds.

O Ongoing Projects Related to UJA-Funded Programs

Audit of the EPA's Identification and Replacement of Lead Service Lines in
Disadvantaged Communities

We issued the project notification, Project No. QA-FY23-0037, on November 17, 2022. Our objective is
to determine whether the EPA distributed Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act funds
to replace lead service lines in disadvantaged communities in adherence with applicable guidance. This
audit is not funded using the OIG's IIJA appropriations but may impact the EPA's IIJA implementation
because the EPA is receiving $15 billion in IIJA appropriations for Drinking Water State Revolving Fund
lead service lines.

Evaluation of EPA Oversight of State Progress to Meet Chesapeake Bay Nutrient- and
Sediment-Reduction Goals

We issued the project notification, Project No. OSRE-FY22-Q139. on June 22, 2022. Our objective is to
determine whether the EPA effectively uses the Accountability Framework for overseeing Chesapeake
Bay Total Maximum Daily Load pollution reduction goals. This evaluation is not IIJA-funded but may
impact the EPA's IIJA implementation because the EPA is receiving $1,717 billion in IIJA appropriations
for geographic programs, including $238 million for Chesapeake Bay.

Audit of the EPA's Pollution Prevention Grants Reporting

We issued the project notification, Project No. OA-FY21-Q225, on July 15, 2021. Our objectives are to
determine whether (1) the EPA accurately reports the environmental results achieved from pollution
prevention grants and (2) those results demonstrate alignment with the goals established for the
pollution prevention grant program. This audit is not funded using the OIG's IIJA appropriations but may
impact the EPA's IIJA implementation because the EPA is receiving $100 million in IIJA appropriations for
the pollution prevention program.

8


-------
n Planned IIJA-Funded Projects

Audit of Unliquidated Obligations in Programs Receiving IIJA Funding

Our objective is to determine the amount of existing unliquidated obligations from annual
appropriations for programs that are expected to receive supplemental funding from the IIJA.

Audit of IIJA Funds Used for Superfund Sites Awaiting Funding

Our objective is to determine whether the EPA is using funds from the IIJA to begin construction projects
at Superfund sites awaiting funding, as required by the Act.

EPA Guidance for IIJA Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Emerging Contaminants

We intend to assess the EPA's collaboration with state officials to provide clear, comprehensive
guidance for the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund that helps ensure states deploy emerging
contaminants funding in accordance with the IIJA and related federal implementation guidance.

Capacity Reviews of Clean Water State Revolving Funds

We plan to initiate a series of capacity reviews on a state-by-state basis. The objective of these reviews
will be to determine high-risk states' capacity to manage IIJA funding.

Inspections of Superfund Sites

We plan to initiate a series of site inspections at Superfund sites designated to receive IIJA funding. The
objective of these inspections will be to determine the effectiveness of institutional controls to ensure
public safety at Superfund sites.

§S Planned Projects Related to IIJA-Funded Programs

Audit of Use of the Clean Water State Revolving Fund to Build Resilience Against
Impacts of Climate Change

Our objective is to determine to what extent (1) the EPA is providing guidance and reviewing state Clean
Water State Revolving Fund intended use plans, as related to climate change resiliency, to meet the
intent of the presidential policy directive to strengthen and maintain secure, functioning, and resilient
critical infrastructure and (2) the states, in their Clean Water State Revolving Fund planning, are
considering climate change resiliency to safeguard federal investment, including the IIJA and annual
appropriation funding. This audit may be partially funded using the OIG's IIJA appropriations because the
EPA is receiving $11.7 billion in IIJA appropriations for the Clean Water State Revolving Fund program.

9


-------
The OIG Conducts Outreach to Help Deter Fraud and Improve
Efficiency

We published our inaugural IIJA Oversight Plan in April 2022 and have since conducted outreach efforts
that have spanned several external stakeholders. The Office of Audit and the Office of Special Review
and Evaluation have engaged in more than 20 outreach activities with the Agency, other OIGs, the
Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency, the Government Accountability Office, and
the public. Outreach activities include
involvement in IIJA working groups,
briefings, interviews, Gold Standard
meetings,3 and conferences. We have also
had three congressional briefings on the
IIJA Oversight Plan.

As of February 28, 2023, the Office of	Cover ima9e from the IIJA Oversight Plan, April 22. (EPA image)

Investigations has hosted 168 IIJA-reiated fraud briefings reaching more than 3,700 attendees. The
Office of Investigations has also coordinated with several grant fund recipients and law enforcement
partners. Recipient coordination includes engaging with multiple state environmental agencies and
programmatic departments, including Brownfields programs, State Revolving Funds, State Water
Development Boards, State Offices of Attorney General, and State OIGs. For partner coordination, the
Office of Investigations has engaged with several task forces and working groups, including the U.S.
Department of Justice's Procurement Collusion Strike Force, a multiagency task force dedicated to
identifying, deterring, investigating, and prosecuting antitrust crimes related procurement and grant
fraud.

When allegations of criminal, civil, and administrative acts related to fraud, waste, and abuse under the
IIJA are reported, the OIG wili investigate. We will also proactively initiate investigations to determine
whether the EPA is spending its IIJA funds properly and to deter fraud, waste, and abuse. As of
February 28, 2023, we have opened two preliminary inquiries, two proactive initiatives, and three cases
involving IIJA-related issues.

3 Gold Standard Meetings are joint program review meetings requiring agencies to engage with the Office of
Management and Budget and the agency's inspector general to discuss program design, risk mitigation, financial
controls, data, tracking, and reporting for implementing the IIJA.

10


-------
The 01G Leverages Data Analysis to Detect Grant and Contract Fraud

Conducting outreach has been an important proactive
effort that we use to help inform the EPA, and those
receiving EPA funds, about ways to identify and deter
potential fraud, waste, and abuse in IIJA-funded programs.

In addition to our external outreach efforts, we are
internally leveraging our data analytics capabilities to
develop methodologies that will assist in proactively
detecting potential grant and contract fraud.

The OIG's Data Analytics Directorate works closely with
the Office of Audit, the Office of Special Review and
Evaluation, and the Office of Investigations to support
their audits, evaluations, and investigations. The Data
Analytics Directorate has been working to identify and
collect grant and contract information from the EPA and
external databases. The Data Analytics Directorate team is beginning to develop procurement collusion
methodologies using, in part, red flags identified from previous fraud investigations and audits. The Data
Analytics Directorate will be creating dashboards and spatial maps that will allow auditors and
investigators to proactively monitor grant and contract spending. For example, if potential fraud is
detected in a procurement program, an investigator will receive an alert to review the data in a
dashboard for further analysis. The Data Analytics Directorate is also developing proactive hotline
monitoring to reveal potential patterns of fraud, waste, and abuse in IIJA-funded programs.

To date, IIJA expenditures for EPA grants and contracts remain small. These expenditures are expected
to increase significantly over the next few years as the EPA hires additional staff who will be responsible
for implementing the distribution of IIJA funds. The Data Analytics Directorate's proactive analytical
approach to detecting grant and contract fraud will be an important component of the OIG's oversight
as IIJA expenditures increase.

The OIG Identifies Continuing Challenges for the Agency

In our annual summary of the most serious management and performance challenges facing the EPA for
fiscal year 2023, known as the Top Management Challenges, we identified concerns related to the EPA's
ability to manage and implement the approximate $60 billion in IIJA funding. These concerns included
the EPA needing to improve its distribution and administration of infrastructure funds; improving and
expanding its available workforce; and working with its program partners to minimize the risk of waste,
fraud, and abuse.

The IIJA allocates most of its EPA funding to existing partner programs with the states, such as the Clean
Water and Drinking Water State Revolving Funds. When the EPA delegates authority for federal
environmental programs, the Agency maintains
oversight to ensure that its partners carry out their
responsibilities, as well as expend the funds
appropriately. Prior to the passage of the IIJA in
November 2021, the EPA was working to close open
recommendations identified by the OIG related to

The EPA OIG leverages data analytics to
develop proactive fraud detection
methodologies, (EPA OIG photo)

Infrastructure pipes for water. (EPA photo)

11


-------
state revolving fund programs. To date, some of the recommendations remain open as the Agency
works to complete the corrective actions that would improve program management and
implementation.

Staffing continues to be a significant challenge for the Agency and its implementation of IIJA-funded
programs. One of the EPA's largest unions noted that noncompetitive salaries and a lack of career
development opportunities are fueling attrition and overburdening staff.4 In addition to these
challenges, the EPA has estimated that it will need to hire 50 percent more grant specialists to its
workforce in 2022 to ease the burden on senior staff so they can focus on IIJA-related issues.5 These are
significant challenges for the Agency and are further compounded by the tight labor market that exists.
The IIJA's environmental project funds give the EPA a unique opportunity to advance its goal of
protecting human health and the environment. As with other comprehensive spending legislation—such
as the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act and the Inflation Reduction Act—there is a risk that the
EPA may mismanage the influx of infrastructure funds, not comply with funding requirements, and fail
to meet programmatic goals.

EPA leadership needs to commit the Agency to proactively address problem areas by effectively
overseeing its program partners. Most of the infrastructure funding will flow through these partner
programs. The Agency should, therefore, commit to improving its capacity to oversee these partner
programs and develop a framework for addressing identified oversight issues.

4	Lylla Younes, At EPA, staffing crisis clashes with expanded mission, Grist (Feb. 14, 2023), https://grist.org/
regulation/at-epa-staffing-crisis-clashes-with-expanded-mission/.

5	Stephen Lee, EPA Hiring More Grant Specialists to Manage Infrastructure Money, Bloomberg Law (Jan. 28, 2022,
10:24 AM), https://news.bloomberglaw.com/environment-and-energy/epa-hiring-more-grant-specialists-to-
manage-infrastructure-monev.

12


-------