CATALOG DOCUMENTATION
EMAP SURFACE WATERS PROGRAM LEVEL DATABASE
1991-1994 NORTHEAST LAKES DATA
LAKE DESIGN DATA

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.	DATA SET IDENTIFICATION

2.	INVESTIGATOR INFORMATION

3.	DATA SET ABSTRACT

4.	OBJECTIVES AND INTRODUCTION

5.	DATA ACQUISITION AND PROCESSING METHODS

6.	DATA MANIPULATIONS

7.	DATA DESCRIPTION

8.	GEOGRAPHIC AND SPATIAL INFORMATION

9.	QUALITY CONTROL / QUALITY ASSURANCE

10.	DATA ACCESS

11.	REFERENCES

12.	TABLE OF ACRONYMS

13.	PERSONNEL INFORMATION

1. DATA SET IDENTIFICATION

1.1	Title of Catalog Document
EMAP Surface Waters Lake Database
1991-1994 Northeast Lakes

Lake Design Data

1.2	Authors of the Catalog Entry

U.S. EPA NHEERL Western Ecology Division
Corvallis, OR

1.3	Catalog Revision Date
June 1997

1. 4 Data Set Name
LDESIGN

1. 5 Task Group
Surface Waters

1.6	Data Set Identification Code
116

1.7	Version
001

1.8	Requested Acknowledgment

These data were produced as part of the U.S. EPA's Environmental Monitoring
and Assessment Program (EMAP). If you publish these data or use them for
analyses in publications, EPA requires a standard statement for work it has
supported:


-------
"Although the data described in this article have been funded wholly or in
part by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency through its EMAP Surface
Waters Program, it has not been subjected to Agency review, and therefore does
not necessarily reflect the views of the Agency and no official endorsement of
the conclusions should be inferred."

2.	INVESTIGATOR INFORMATION

2.1	Principal Investigator
Dr. John Stoddard

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
NHEERL Western Ecology Division
200 S.W. 35th Street
Corvallis, OR 97333

2.2	Investigation Participant - Sample Collection

3.	DATA SET ABSTRACT

3.1	Abstract of the Data Set

The primary function of the lake design data are to provide the ability for
researchers to calculate population estimates using data collected under
the EMAP probability-based statistical survey design.

3.2	Keywords for the Data Set

weighting factors, probability design, statistical analysis, regional
estimates.

4. OBJECTIVES AND INTRODUCTION

4.1	Program Objective

The Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP) was designed to
periodically estimate the status and trends of the Nation's ecological
resources on a regional basis. EMAP provides a strategy to identify and bound
the extent, magnitude and location of environmental degradation and
improvement on a regional scale based on a probability-based statistical
survey design.

4.2	Data Set Objective

This data set is part of a demonstration project to evaluate approaches to
monitoring lakes in EMAP. The data set contains the statistical weighting
factors which allow the data to be summarized into statements about the
status of Lakes in the Northeast region.


-------
4.3	Data Set Background Discussion

Data on the lakes for site selection were summarized from digital and paper
sources. Lakes were classified as target or non-target; target lakes
were categorized by lake surface area into six classes. Sample weights for
each sampled lake were determined using the sample sizes for each size
class and total surface area in each size class. Lakes were chosen
randomly, using a clustering algorithm which spread the sample spatially
across the region. Information on each sampled lake was collected using
information taken from maps, digital sources, and visits to the site.

4.4	Summary of Data Set Parameters

Information on each lake sampled, such as the lake name, geographic
location, size class, county and state are stored in this data set.
The weighting factors for each lake are also stored in this data set.

There are separate weighting factors for fish (fish assemblage and fish
tissue), and for the other indicator types (chemistry, birds, benthos,
etc.). The weighting factors are to be used when computing regional
estimates for the entire data set over the four year period. Further
details on the methods which should be used when processing these
data can be obtained from the Information Management contact, below.

5. DATA ACQUISITION AND PROCESSING METHODS
5.1 Data Acquisition

the defined population
sampling window from

5.1.2	Sample Collection Methods Summary
Not Applicable

5.1.3	Sampling Start Date
July 1991

5.1.4	Sampling End Date
September 1994

5.1.5	Platform
NA

5.1.6	Sampling Gear
NA

5.1.7	Manufacturer of Instruments
NA

5.1.8	Key Variables
NA

5.1.9	Sampling Method Calibration
NA

5.1.1	Sampling Objective

To allow scientists to summarize indicator data for
of lakes in the Northeast region during a two month
July through mid-September.


-------
5.1.10 Sample Collection Quality Control
See Baker et al. (1997) .

5.1.11 Sample Collection Method Reference

Baker, J.R., G.D. Merritt, and D.W. Sutton (eds.). 1997. Environmental
Monitoring and Assessment Program - Surface Waters: Field Operations Manual
for Lakes.

Chaloud, D.J. and D.V. Peck. 1994. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Program - Surface Waters: Integrated Quality Assurance Project Plan for the
Surface Waters Resource Group.

5.1.12 Sample Collection Method Deviations
NA

5.2 Data Preparation and Sample Processing

5.2.1	Sample Processing Objective

See Baker et al. (1997) and Chaloud and Peck (1994).

5.2.2	Sample Processing Methods Summary

See Baker et al. (1997) and Chaloud and Peck (1994) .

5.2.3	Sample Processing Method Calibration

See Baker et al. (1997) and Chaloud and Peck (1994).

5.2.4	Sample Processing Quality Control

See Baker et al. (1997) and Chaloud and Peck (1994).

5.2.5	Sample Processing Method Reference

See Baker et al. (1997) and Chaloud and Peck (1994).

6. DATA MANIPULATIONS

6.1 Name of New or Modified Values
None.

6.2 Data Manipulation Description
See Chaloud and Peck (1994).


-------
7. DATA DESCRIPTION

7 .1 Description

of Parameters



Parameter

Data



Parameter



Name

Type

Len

Format Label



COUNTY

Char

40

Lake County Location



ECO_ATH

Char

15

Broad Ecoregion Location



ELEV

Num

8

Lake Elevation from 7.5 Map (feet)



GRID	TYP

Char

1

G=1X Grid,A=3X Augment (TIME),F=IES Fish

HEXSW_ID

Char

12

EMAP hexagon identifier



LAKEAREA

Num

8

Lake Area from Las Vegas GIS (ha)



LAKENAME

Char

30

Lake Name



LAKE	ID

Char

6

Lake Identification Code



LAT_DD

Num

8

Lake Latitude (decimal degrees)



LON_DD

Num

8

Lake Longitude (-decimal degrees)



MAP	10 0

Char

20

Lake 1:100,000 USGS Map Name



MAP_75

Char

25

7 . 5 Minute USGS Map Name



REG_3X

Char

6

Name of TIME Augment Region



REPEAT91

Char

1

Repeat Sample on Lake - Y/N



REPEAT92

Char

10

Repeat Visit Status (Plan)



REPEAT93

Char

1

2X2 Index/Annual 1993 Repeat Lake

(Y/N)

REPEAT94

Char

1

2x2 Index/Annual 1994 Repeat Lake

(Y/N)

SITECLS

Char

10

Lake Sample Class



SIZE	CLS

Char

8

Tier 2 Lake Area Size Class (ha)



STATE

Char

2

State Location



TIME_REG

Char

8

TIME Study Region Location



TIME_REP

Char

1

Annual Time Repeat Lake (Y/N)



WGT	IX

Num

8

lx Weight (# lakes) for 1991-1994



WGT	3X

Num

8

3x Weight (# lakes) for 1991-1994



WGT_FS

Num

8

Fish Sample Wgt (# lakes) for 1991

-1994

YEAR

Num

8

Year Sampled



YEARORIG

Char

4

Sample Year for Lake Selection



7.1.1	Precision to which values are reported
Total abundance is reported as a whole number.

Mean abundance and standard deviation (SD) are reported to 2 decimal places.

7.1.2	Minimum Value in Data Set

Name	Min

ELEV	22

LAKEAREA	1

LAT_DD	39.0683

LON_DD	-79.42944

WGT	IX	0

WGT	3X	0

WGT_FS	313.6

YEAR	1991


-------
7.1.3 Maximum Value in Data Set

Name	Max

ELEV	2190

LAKEAREA	34014.84

LAT_DD	47.2125

LON_DD	-67.30111

WGT	IX	200

WGT	3X	200

WGT_FS	2508.8

YEAR	1994

7.2 Data Record Example

7.2.1	Column Names for Example Records

COUNTY,ECO_ATH,ELEV,GRID	TYP,HEXSW_ID,LAKEAREA,LAKENAME,LAKE	ID,LAT_DD,LON_DD,

MAP	100 ,MAP_75,REG_3X,REPEAT91,REPEAT92,REPEAT93,REPEAT94,SITECLS,SIZE_CLS,

STATE,TIME_REG,TIME_REP,WGT_1X,WGT_3X,WGT_FS,YEAR,YEARORIG

7.2.2	Example Data Records

"	"G","1310120",1,"MRS. POUND'S POND"CT001L",41.45667,-73.20028,"

M M M M MNTT M M M M M »,»NON-TARGETA:1-5CTNEWENG128 ,128 1991,
"1991"

"	"G","1032230",19.5,"BISSONETTE POND","CT002L",41.92417,-72.21889, "

M M M M	»,» »,» " , "TARGET" , "B: 5-20" , "CT" , "NEWENG" , " " , 64 , 64 , . , 1991,

"1991"

"	"G","1032230",1.6,"NO NAME","CT003L",41.87639,-72.20278,"	",

it " , "N" , " "," "," ", "NON-LAKE" , "A: 1-5" , "CT" , "NEWENG" , " ", 128 ,128 ,., 1991,

"1991"

8. GEOGRAPHIC AND SPATIAL INFORMATION

8.1	Minimum Longitude

-79 Degrees 25 Minutes 45.98 Seconds West ( -79.42944 Decimal Degrees )

8.2	Maximum Longitude

-67 Degrees 18 Minutes 3.96 Seconds West ( -67.30111 Decimal Degrees )

8 . 3 Minimum Latitude
39 Degrees 4 Minutes 5.88 Seconds North ( 39.0683 Decimal Degrees )

8.4	Maximum Latitude

47 Degrees 12 Minutes 45.00 Seconds North ( 47.2125 Decimal Degrees )

8.5	Name of Area or Region

Northeast: EPA Regions I and II which includes Connecticut, Massachusetts,
Maine, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Vermont, Rhode Island


-------
9. QUALITY CONTROL / QUALITY ASSURANCE

9.1	Data Quality Objectives
See Chaloud and Peck (1994)

9.2	Quality Assurance Procedures
See Chaloud and Peck (1994)

9.3	Unassessed Errors
NA

10.	DATA ACCESS

10.1	Data Access Procedures

10.2	Data Access Restrictions

10.3	Data Access Contact Persons

10.4	Data Set Format

10.5	Information Concerning Anonymous FTP

10.6	Information Concerning Gopher and WWW

10.7	EMAP CD-ROM Containing the Data

11. REFERENCES

Baker, J.R., G.D. Merritt, and D.W. Sutton (eds.). 1997. Environmental
Monitoring and Assessment Program - Surface Waters: Field Operations Manual
for Lakes. EPA/620/R-97/001. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Office of Research and Development. Washington, D.C.

Chaloud, D.J. and D.V. Peck. 1994. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Program - Surface Waters: Integrated Quality Assurance Project Plan for the
Surface Waters Resource Group. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office
of Research and Development.

Diaz-Ramos, S., D.L. Stevens, Jr., and A.R. Olsen. 1996. EMAP Statistical
Methods Manual. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Research
and Development. EPA/620/R-96/002.

12. TABLE OF ACRONYMS


-------
13. PERSONNEL INFORMATION

Project Manager
Dr. John Stoddard

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

NHEERL Western Ecology Division

200 S.W. 35th Street

Corvallis, OR 97333

541-754-4441

541-754-4716(FAX)

stoddard0mail.cor.epa.gov

Quality Assurance Officer
Dave Peck

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

NHEERL Western Ecology Division

200 S.W. 35th Street

Corvallis, OR 97333

541-754-4426

541-754-4716(FAX)

davep0mail.cor.epa.gov

Information Management, EMAP-Surface Waters
Marlys Cappaert

OAO c/o U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

NHEERL Western Ecology Division

200 S.W. 35th Street

Corvallis, OR 97333

541-754-4467

541-754-4716(FAX)

cappaert0mail.cor.epa.gov


-------