METHOD 515.2 DETERMINATION OF CHLORINATED ACIDS IN WATER USING LIQUID-SOLID EXTRACTION AND GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY WITH AN ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTOR Revision 1.0 August 1992 R.C. Dressman and J.J. Lichtenberg EPA 600/4-81-053, Revision 1.0 (1981) J.W. Hodgeson Method 515, Revision 2.0 (1986) T. Engels (Battelle Columbus Laboratories) - National Pesticide Survey Method 3, Revision 3.0 (1987) R.L. Graves Method 515.1, Revision 4.0 (1989) J.W. Hodgeson Method 515.2, Revision 1.0 (1992) ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING SYSTEMS LABORATORY OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY CINCINNATI, OHIO 45268 515.2-1 ------- METHOD 515.2 DETERMINATION OF CHLORINATED ACIDS IN WATER USING LIQUID-SOLID EXTRACTION AND GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY WITH AN ELECTRON CAPTURE DETECTOR 1.0 SCOPE AND APPLICATION 1.1 This is a gas chromatographic (GC) method applicable to the determination of certain chlorinated acids in ground water and finished drinking water. The following compounds can be determined by this method: Analyte Chemical Abstract Services Registry Number Acifluorfen 50594-66-6 Bentazon 25057-89-0 2,4-D 94-75-7 2,4-DB 94-82-6 Dacthal3 1861-32-1 Dicamba 1918-00-9 3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid 51-36-5 Dichlorprop 120-36-5 Dinoseb 88-85-7 5-Hydroxydicamba 7600-50-2 Pentachlorophenol (PCP) 87-86-5 Picloram 1918-02-1 2,4,5-T 93-76-5 2,4,5-TP (Silvex) 93-72-1 'Dacthal monoacid and diacid metabolites included in method scope; Dacthal diacid metabolite used for validation studies. 1.2 This method is applicable to the determination of salts and esters of analyte acids. The form of each acid is not distinguished by this method. Results are calculated and reported for each listed analyte as the total free acid. 1.3 Single laboratory accuracy and precision data and method detection limits (MDLs) have been determined for the analytes above (Section 13.0). Observed detection limits may vary among water matrices, depending upon the nature of interferences in the sample matrix and the specific instrumentation used. 1.4 This method is restricted to use by or under the supervision of analysts experienced in the use of GC and in the interpretation of gas chromatograms. Each analyst must demonstrate the ability to generate acceptable results with this method using the procedure described in Section 9.3. 515.2-2 ------- 1.5 Analytes that are not separated chromatographically, (i.e., have very similar retention times) cannot be individually identified and measured in the same calibration mixture or water sample unless an alternative technique for identification and quantitation exists (Section 11.6). 1.6 When this method is used to analyze unfamiliar samples for any or all of the analytes above, analyte identifications should be confirmed by analysis on a second gas chromatographic column or by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). 2.0 SUMMARY OF METHOD 2.1 A 250 mL measured volume of sample is adjusted to pH 12 with 6 N sodium hydroxide for one hour to hydrolyze derivatives. Extraneous organic material is removed by a solvent wash. The sample is acidified, and the chlorinated acids are extracted with a 47 mm resin based extraction disk. The acids are converted to their methyl esters using diazomethane. Excess derivatizing reagent is removed, and the esters are determined by capillary column GC using an electron capture detector (ECD). 3.0 DEFINITIONS 3.1 Internal Standard (IS) A pure analyte(s) added to a sample, extract, or standard solution in known amount(s), and used to measure the relative responses of other method analytes and surrogates that are components of the same sample or solution. The IS must be an analyte that is not a sample component. 3.2 Surrogate Analyte (SA) A pure analyte(s), which is extremely unlikely to be found in any sample, and which is added to a sample aliquot in known amount(s) before extraction or other processing, and is measured with the same procedures used to measure other sample components. The purpose of the SA is to monitor method performance with each sample. 3.3 Laboratory Duplicates (LD1 AND LD2) Two aliquots of the same sample taken in the analytical laboratory and analyzed separately with identical procedures. Analyses of LD1 and LD2 indicate the precision associated with laboratory procedures, but not with sample collection, preservation, or storage procedures. 3.4 Field Duplicates (FD1 AND FD2) Two separate samples collected at the same time and place under identical circumstances and treated exactly the same throughout field and laboratory procedures. Analyses of FD1 and FD2 give a measure of the precision associated with sample collection, preservation and storage, as well as with laboratory procedures. 3.5 Laboratory Reagent Blank (LRB) An aliquot of reagent water or other blank matrix that is treated exactly as a sample including exposure to all glassware, 515.2-3 ------- equipment, solvents, reagents, internal standards, and surrogates that are used with other samples. The LRB is used to determine if method analytes or other interferences are present in the laboratory environment, the reagents, or the apparatus. 3.6 Field Reagent Blank (FRB) An aliquot of reagent water or other blank matrix that is placed in a sample container in the laboratory and treated as a sample in all respects, including shipment to the sampling site, exposure to sampling site conditions, storage, preservation and all analytical procedures. The purpose of the FRB is to determine if method analytes or other interferences are present in the field environment. 3.7 Instrument Performance Check Solution (IPC) A solution of one or more method analytes, surrogates, internal standards, or other test substances used to evaluate the performance of the instrument system with respect to a defined set of criteria. 3.8 Laboratory Fortified Blank (LFB) An aliquot of reagent water or other blank matrix to which known quantities of the method analytes are added in the laboratory. The LFB is analyzed exactly like a sample, and its purpose is to determine whether the methodology is in control, and whether the laboratory is capable of making accurate and precise measurements. 3.9 Laboratory Fortified Sample Matrix (LFM) An aliquot of an environmental sample to which known quantities of the method analytes are added in the laboratory. The LFM is analyzed exactly like a sample, and its purpose is to determine whether the sample matrix contributes bias to the analytical results. The background concentrations of the analytes in the sample matrix must be determined in a separate aliquot, and the measured values in the LFM corrected for background concentrations. 3.10 Stock Standard Solution (SSS) A concentrated solution containing one or more method analytes prepared in the laboratory using assayed reference materials or purchased from a reputable commercial source. 3.11 Primary Dilution Standard Solution (PDS) A solution of several analytes prepared in the laboratory from stock standard solutions, and diluted as needed to prepare calibration solutions and other needed analyte solutions. 3.12 Calibration Standard (CAL) A solution prepared from the primary dilution standard solution or stock standard solutions and the internal standards and surrogate analytes. The CAL solutions are used to calibrate the instrument response with respect to analyte concentration. 3.13 Quality Control Sample (QCS) A solution of method analytes of known concentrations which is used to fortify an aliquot of LRB or sample matrix. The QCS is obtained from a source external to the laboratory and different 515.2-4 ------- from the source of calibration standards. It is used to check laboratory performance with externally prepared test materials. INTERFERENCES 4.1 Method interferences may be caused by contaminants in solvents, reagents, glassware and other sample processing apparatus that lead to discrete artifacts or elevated baselines in gas chromatograms. All reagents and apparatus must be routinely demonstrated to be free from interferences under analytical conditions by analyzing laboratory reagent blanks as described in Section 9.2. 4.1.1 Glassware must be scrupulously cleaned.1 Clean all glassware as soon as possible after use by thoroughly rinsing with the last solvent used in it. Follow by washing with hot water and detergent and thorough rinsing with dilute acid, tap and reagent water. Drain dry, and heat in an oven or muffle furnace at 400°C for one hour. Do not heat volumetric ware. Thermally stable materials such as PCBs might not be eliminated by this treatment. Thorough rinsing with acetone may be substituted for the heating. After glassware is dry and cool, store it in a clean environment to prevent any accumulation of dust or other contaminants. Store inverted or capped with aluminum foil. 4.1.2 The use of high purity reagents and solvents helps to minimize interference problems. Purification of solvents by distillation in all-glass systems may be required. WARNING: When a solvent is purified, stabilizers and preservatives added by the manufacturer are removed, thus potentially making the solvent hazardous and reducing the shelf life. 4.2 The acid forms of the analytes are strong organic acids which react readily with alkaline substances and can be lost during sample preparation. Glassware and glass wool must be acid-rinsed with 1 N hydrochloric acid and the sodium sulfate must be acidified with sulfuric acid prior to use to avoid analyte losses due to adsorption. 4.3 Organic acids and phenols, especially chlorinated compounds, cause the most direct interference with the determination. Alkaline hydrolysis and subsequent extraction of the basic sample removes many chlorinated hydrocarbons and phthalate esters that might otherwise interfere with the electron capture analysis. 4.4 Interferences by phthalate esters can pose a major problem in pesticide analysis when using the ECD. Phthalates generally appear in the chromatogram as large peaks. Common flexible plastics contain varying amounts of phthalates, that are easily extracted or leached during laboratory operations. Cross- contamination of clean glassware routinely occurs when plastics are handled during extraction steps, especially when solvent-wetted surfaces are handled. 515.2-5 ------- Interferences from phthalates can best be minimized by avoiding the use of plastics in the laboratory. Exhaustive purification of reagents and glassware may be required to eliminate background phthalate contamination.2,3 4.5 Interfering contamination may occur when a sample containing low concentrations of analytes is analyzed immediately following a sample containing relatively high concentrations of analytes. Between-sample rinsing of the sample syringe and associated equipment with methyl-tert-butyl-ether (MTBE) can minimize sample cross- contamination. After analysis of a sample containing high concentrations of analytes, one or more injections of MTBE should be made to ensure that accurate values are obtained for the next sample. 4.6 Matrix interferences may be caused by contaminants that are coextracted from the sample. Also, note that all analytes listed in the Scope and Application section are not resolved from each other on any one column, i.e., one analyte of interest may interfere with another analyte of interest. The extent of matrix interferences will vary considerably from source to source, depending upon the water sampled. The procedures in Section 11.0 can be used to overcome many of these interferences. Tentative identifications should be confirmed (Section 11.6). 4.7 It is important that samples and working standards be contained in the same solvent. The solvent for working standards must be the same as the final solvent used in sample preparation. If this is not the case, chromatographic comparability of standards to sample extracts may be affected. SAFETY 5.1 The toxicity or carcinogenicity of each reagent used in this method has not been precisely defined; however, each chemical compound must be treated as a potential health hazard. Accordingly, exposure to these chemicals must be reduced to the lowest possible level. The laboratory is responsible for maintaining a current awareness file of OSHA regulations regarding the safe handling of the chemicals specified in this method. A reference file of material safety data sheets should also be made available to all personnel involved in the chemical analysis. Additional references to laboratory safety are available and have been identified5 7 for the information of the analyst. 5.2 Diazomethane A toxic carcinogen which can explode under certain conditions. The following precautions must be followed: 5.2.1 Use the diazomethane generator behind a safety shield in a well ventilated fume hood. Under no circumstances can the generator be heated above 90°C, and all grinding surfaces such as ground glass joints, sleeve bearings, and glass stirrers must be avoided. Diazomethane solutions must not be stored. Only generate enough for the immediate needs. The diazomethane generator apparatus used in 515.2-6 ------- the esterification procedure (Section 11.4) produces micromolar amounts of diazomethane in solution to minimize safety hazards. If the procedure is followed exactly, no possibility for explosion exists. 5.3 Methyl-Tert-Butyl Ether Nanograde, redistilled in glass, if necessary. Must be free of peroxides as indicated by EM Quant test strips (available from Scientific Products Co., Cat. No. PI 126-8, and other suppliers). WARNING: When a solvent is purified, stabilizers added by the manufacturer are removed, thus potentially making the solvent hazardous. EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES (All specifications are suggested. Catalog numbers are included for illustration only.) 6.1 Kontes Filter Funnels Fisher Cat. No. 953755-0000 or equivalent. 6.2 Vacuum Flasks 1000 mL with glass side arm. 6.3 Vacuum Manifold The manifold should be capable of holding six to eight filter flasks in series with house vacuum. Commercial manifolds are available from a number of suppliers, e.g., Baker, Fisher, and Varian. 6.4 Culture Tubes (25 x 200 mm) with Teflon-lined Screw Caps Fisher Cat. No. 14-933-1C, or equivalent. 6.5 Pasteur Pipets Glass disposable (5 mL). 6.6 Large Volume Pipets Disposable, Fisher Cat. No. 13-678-8 or equivalent. 6.7 Balance Analytical, capable of weighing to .0001 g. 6.8 pH Meter Wide range capable of accurate measurements in the pH = 1-12 range. 6.9 Diazomethane Generator See Figure 1 for a diagram of an all glass system custom made for these validation studies. A micromolar generator is also available from Aldrich Chemical. 6.10 Analytical Concentrator Six or 12 positions, Organomation N-EVAP Model No. 111-6917 or equivalent. 6.11 Gas Chromatography Analytical system complete with gas chromatograph equipped with ECD, split/splitless capillary injector, temperature programming, differential flow control and all required accessories. A data system is recommended for measuring peak areas. An autoinjector is recommended to improve precision of analysis. 515.2-7 ------- 6.12 GC Columns and Recommended Operating Conditions 6.12.1 Primary DB-5 or equivalent, 30 m x .32 mm ID, 0.25 |im film thickness. Injector Temp. = 200°C, Detector Temp. = 280°C, Helium linear velocity is 30 cm/sec at 200°C and 10 psi, 2 |iL splitless injection with purge on three minutes. Program: Hold at 60°C one minute, increase to 260°C at 5°C/min. and hold five minutes. 6.12.2 Confirmation DB-1701 or equivalent, 30 m x .32 mm ID, 0.25 |im film thickness. Injector Temp. = 200°C, Detector Temp. = 280°C, Helium linear velocity is 30 cm/sec at 200°C and 10 psi, 2 |iL splitless injection with purge on three minutes. Program: Hold at 60°C one minute, increase to 260°C at 5°C/min. and hold five minutes. 6.13 Glass Wool Acid washed with IN HC1 and heated at 450°C for four hours. 6.14 Short Range pH Paper (pH=0-3). 6.15 Volumetric Flasks 50 mL, 100 mL, and 250 mL. 6.16 Microsyringes 25 |iL, 50 |iL, 100 |iL, 250 |iL, and 500 |iL. 6.17 Amber Bottles -15 mL, with Teflon-lined screw caps. 6.18 Graduated Cylinder 250 mL. 6.19 Separatory Funnel 500 mL. 6.20 Graduated Centrifuge Tubes 15 mL or 10 mL Kuderna Danish Concentrator tubes. REAGENTS AND STANDARDS 7.1 Extraction Disks, 47 mm Resin based polystyrenedivinylbenzene. 7.2 Reagent Water Reagent water is defined as a water in which an interference is not observed at the MDL of each analyte of interest. 7.2.1 A Millipore Super-Q water system or its equivalent may be used to generate deionized reagent water. Distilled water that has been passed through granular charcoal may also be suitable. 7.2.2 Test reagent water each day it is used by analyzing according to Section 11.0. 7.3 Methanol Pesticide quality or equivalent. 515.2-8 ------- 7.4 Methyl-Tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) Nanograde, redistilled in glass if necessary. Ether must be demonstrated to be free of peroxides. One test kit (EM Quant Test Strips), is available from EM Science, Gibbstown, NJ. Procedures for removing peroxides from the ether are provided with the test strips. Ethers must be periodically tested (at least monthly) for peroxide formation during use. Any reliable test kit may be used. 7.5 Sodium Sulfate ACS, granular, anhydrous. Heat in a shallow tray at 400°C for a minimum of four hours to remove phthalates and other interfering organic substances. Alternatively, extract with methylene chloride in a Soxhlet apparatus for 48 hours. 7.5.1 Sodium sulfate drying tubes Plug the bottom of a large volume disposable pipet with a minimum amount of acidified glass wool (Supelco Cat. No. 20383 or equivalent). Fill the pipet halfway (3 g) with acidified sodium sulfate (See Section 7.9). 7.6 Sulfuric Acid Reagent grade 7.6.1 Sulfuric acid, 12 N Slowly add 335 mL concentrated sulfuric acid to 665 mL of reagent water. 7.7 Sodium Hydroxide ACS reagent grade or equivalent. 7.7.1 Sodium hydroxide IN Dissolve 4.0 g reagent grade sodium hydroxide in reagent water and dilute to 100 mL in volumetric flasks. 7.7.2 Sodium hydroxide 6N 7.8 Ethyl Ether, Unpreserved Nanograde, redistilled in glass if necessary. Must be free of peroxides as indicated by EM Quant test strips (available from Scientific Products Co., Cat. No. PI 126-8, and other suppliers). Procedures recommended for removal of peroxides are provided with the test strips. 7.9 Acidified Sodium Sulfate Cover 500 g sodium sulfate (Section 7.5) with ethyl ether (Section 7.8). While agitating vigorously, add dropwise approximately 0.7 mL concentrated sulfuric acid. Remove the ethyl ether overnight under vacuum and store the sodium sulfate in a 100°C oven. 7.10 Carbitol ACS grade. Available from Aldrich Chemical. 7.11 Diazald ACS grade. Available from Aldrich Chemical. 7.12 Diazald Solution Prepare a solution containing 10 g Diazald in 100 mL of a 50:50 by volume mixture of ethyl ether and carbitol. This solution is stable for one month or longer when stored at 4°C in an amber bottle with a Teflon-lined screw cap. 515.2-9 ------- 7.13 4,4'-Dibromooctafluorobiphenyl (DBOB) 99% purity, for use as internal standard. 7.14 2,4-Dichlorophenylacetic Acid (DCAA) 99% purity, for use as surrogate standard. 7.15 Potassium Hydroxide ACS reagent grade or equivalent. 7.15.1 Potassium hydroxide solution, 37% Using extreme caution, dissolve 37 g reagent grade potassium hydroxide in reagent water and dilute to 100 mL. 7.16 Stock Standard Solutions (1.00-2.00 |ig/|_iL) Stock standard solutions may be purchased as certified solutions or prepared from pure standard materials using the following procedure: 7.16.1 Prepare stock standard solutions by accurately weighing approximately 0.0100-0.0200 g of pure material. Dissolve the material in methanol and dilute to volume in a 10 mL volumetric flask. Larger volumes may be used at the convenience of the analyst. If compound purity is certified at 96% or greater, the weight may be used without correction to calculate the concentration of the stock standard. Commercially prepared stock standards may be used at any concentration if they are certified by the manufacturer or by an independent source. 7.16.2 Transfer the stock standard solutions into 15 mL TFE-fluorocarbon-sealed screw cap amber vials. Store at 4°C or less when not in use. 7.16.3 Stock standard solutions should be replaced after two months or sooner if comparison with laboratory fortified blanks, or QC samples indicate a problem. 7.16.4 Primary dilution standards Prepare two sets of standards according to the sets labeled A and B in Table 1. For each set, add approximately 25 mL of methanol to a 50 mL volumetric flask. Add aliquots of each stock standard in the range of approximately 20-400 |iL and dilute to volume with methanol. Individual analyte concentrations will then be in the range of 0.4-8 ]ig/mL (for a 1.0 mg/mL stock). The minimum concentration would be appropriate for an analyte with strong electron capture detector (ECD) response, e.g. pentachlorophenol. The maximum concentration is for an analyte with weak response, e.g., 2,4- DB. The concentrations given in Table 2 reflect the relative volumes of stock standards used for the primary dilution standards used in generating the method validation data. Use these relative values to determine the aliquot volumes of individual stock standards above. 515.2-10 ------- 7.17 Internal Standard Solution Prepare a stock internal standard solution by accurately weighing approximately 0.050 g of pure DBOB. Dissolve the DBOB in methanol and dilute to volume in a 10 mL volumetric flask. Transfer the DBOB solution to a TFE-fluorocarbonsealed screw cap bottle and store at room temperature. Prepare a primary dilution standard at approximately 1.00 |ig/mL by the addition of 20 |iL of the stock standard to 100 mL of methanol. Addition of 100 |iL of the primary dilution standard solution to the final 5 mL of sample extract (Section 11.0) results in a final internal standard concentration of 0.020 |ig/mL. Solution should be replaced when ongoing QC (Section 9.0) indicates a problem. Note that DBOB has been shown to be an effective internal standard for the method analytes, but other compounds may be used if the QC requirements in Section 9.0 are met. 7.18 Surrogate Analyte Solution Prepare a surrogate analyte stock standard solution by accurately weighing approximately 0.050 g of pure DCAA. Dissolve the DCAA in methanol and dilute to volume in a 10 mL volumetric flask. Transfer the surrogate analyte solution to a TFE-fluorocarbon-sealed screw cap bottle and store at room temperature. Prepare a primary dilution standard at approximately 2.0 |ig/mL by addition of 40 |iL at the stock standard to 100 mL of methanol. Addition of 250 |iL of the surrogate analyte solution to a 250 mL sample prior to extraction results in a surrogate concentration in the sample of 2 Hg/L and, assuming quantitative recovery of DCAA, a surrogate analyte concentration in the final 5 mL extract of 0.1 |ig/mL. The surrogate standard solution should be replaced when ongoing QC (Section 9.0) indicates a problem. DCAA has been shown to be an effective surrogate standard for the method analytes, but other compounds may be used if the QC requirements in Section 10.0 are met. 7.19 Instrument Performance Check Solution Prepare a diluted dinoseb solution by adding 10 |iL of the 1.0 \ig/\iL dinoseb stock solution to the MTBE and diluting to volume in a 10 mL volumetric flask. To prepare the check solution, add 40 |iL of the diluted dinoseb solution, 16 |iL of the 4-nitrophenol stock solution, 6 |iL of the 3,5-dichlorobenzoic acid stock solution, 50 |iL of the surrogate standard solution, 25 pL of the internal standard solution, and 250 |iL of methanol to a 5 mL volumetric flask and dilute to volume with MTBE. Methylate sample as described in Section 11.4. Dilute the sample to 10 mL in MTBE. Transfer to a TFE-fluorocarbon-sealed screw cap bottle and store at room temperature. Solution should be replaced when ongoing QC (Section 9.0) indicates a problem. SAMPLE COLLECTION. PRESERVATION. AND STORAGE 8.1 Grab samples should be collected in 1 L amber glass containers. Conventional sampling practices7 should be followed; however, the bottle must not be prerinsed with sample before collection. 515.2-11 ------- 8.2 Sample Preservation and Storage 8.2.1 Add hydrochloric acid (diluted 1:1 in water) to the sample at the sampling site in amounts to produce a sample pH <2. Short range (0-3) pH paper (Section 6.14) may be used to monitor the pH. 8.2.2 If residual chlorine is present, add 80 mg of sodium thiosulfate per liter of sample to the sample bottle prior to collecting the sample. 8.2.3 After the sample is collected in the bottle containing preservative(s), seal the bottle and shake vigorously for one minute. 8.2.4 The samples must be iced or refrigerated at 4°C away from light from the time of collection until extraction. Preservation study results indicate that the sample analytes (measured as total acid), except 5- hydroxy-dicamba, are stable in water for 14 days when stored under these conditions (Tables 8 and 9). The concentration of 5- hydroxydicamba is seriously degraded over 14 days in a biologically active matrix. However, analyte stability will very likely be affected by the matrix; therefore, the analyst should verify that the preservation technique is applicable to the samples under study. 8.3 Extract Storage 8.3.1 Extracts should be stored at 4°C or less away from light. Preservation study results indicate that most analytes are stable for 14 days (Tables 8 and 9); however, the analyst should verify appropriate extract holding times applicable to the samples under study. QUALITY CONTROL 9.1 Minimum QC requirements are initial demonstration of laboratory capability, determination of surrogate compound recoveries in each sample and blank, monitoring internal standard peak area or height in each sample and blank (when internal standard calibration procedures are being employed), analysis of laboratory reagent blanks, laboratory fortified samples, laboratory fortified blanks, and QC samples. 9.2 Laboratory Reagent Blanks (LRB) Before processing any samples, the analyst must demonstrate that all glassware and reagent interferences are under control. Each time a set of samples is extracted or reagents are changed, a LRB must be analyzed. If within the retention time window of any analyte the LRB produces a peak that would prevent the determination of that analyte, determine the source of contamination and eliminate the interference before processing samples. 515.2-12 ------- 9.3 Initial Demonstration of Capability 9.3.1 Select a representative fortified concentration (about 10 to 20 times MDL) for each analyte. Prepare a sample concentrate (in methanol) containing each analyte at 1000 times selected concentration. With a syringe, add 250 |iL of the concentrate to each of at least four 250 mL aliquots of reagent water, and analyze each aliquot according to procedures beginning in Section 11.0. 9.3.2 For each analyte the recovery value for all four of these samples must fall in the range of ±40% of the fortified concentration. For those compounds that meet the acceptance criteria, performance is considered acceptable and sample analysis may begin. For compounds failing this criteria, this procedure must be repeated using five fresh samples until satisfactory performance has been demonstrated for all analytes. 9.3.3 The initial demonstration of capability is used primarily to preclude a laboratory from analyzing unknown samples via a new, unfamiliar method prior to obtaining some experience with it. As laboratory personnel gain experience with this method the quality of data should improve beyond those required here. 9.4 The analyst is permitted to modify GC columns, GC conditions, detectors, concentration techniques (i.e., evaporation techniques), internal standard or surrogate compounds. Each time such method modifications are made, the analyst must repeat the procedures in Section 9.3. 9.5 Assessing Surrogate Recovery 9.5.1 When surrogate recovery from a sample or a blank is <60% or >140%, check (1) calculations to locate possible errors, (2) fortifying solutions for degradation, (3) contamination, and (4) instrument performance. If those steps do not reveal the cause of the problem, reanalyze the extract. 9.5.2 If a blank extract reanalysis fails the 60-140% recovery criteria, the problem must be identified and corrected before continuing. 9.5.3 If sample extract reanalysis meets the surrogate recovery criteria, report only data for the reanalyzed extract. If sample extract continues to fail the recovery criteria, report all data for that sample as suspect. 9.6 Assessing the Internal Standard 9.6.1 When using the internal standard (IS) calibration procedure, the analyst is expected to monitor the IS response (peak area or peak height) of all samples during each analysis day. The IS response for any sample 515.2-13 ------- chromatogram should not deviate from the daily calibration check standard's IS response by more than 30%. 9.6.2 If >30% deviation occurs with an individual extract, optimize instrument performance and inject a second aliquot of that extract. 9.6.2.1 If the reinjected aliquot produces an acceptable internal standard response, report results for that aliquot. 9.6.2.2 If a deviation of greater than 30% is obtained for the reinjected extract, analysis of the samples should be repeated beginning with Section 11.0, provided the sample is still available. Otherwise, report results obtained from the reinjected extract, but annotate as suspect. 9.6.3 If consecutive samples fail the IS response acceptance criteria, immediately analyze a medium calibration standard. 9.6.3.1 If the standard provides a response factor (RF) (Section 10.2.2) within 20% of the predicted value, then follow procedures itemized in Section 9.6.2 for each sample failing the IS response criterion. 9.6.3.2 If the check standard provides a response factor which deviates more than 20% of the predicted value, then the analyst must recalibrate as specified in Section 10.0. Assessing Laboratory Performance Laboratory Fortified Blank (LFB) 9.7.1 The laboratory must analyze at least one LFB sample with every 20 samples or one per sample set (all samples extracted within a 24-hour period) whichever is greater. The concentration of each analyte in the LFB should be 10 times the MDL. Calculate percent recovery (Xj). If the recovery of any analyte falls outside the control limits (See Section 9.7.2), that analyte is judged out of control, and the source of the problem should be identified and resolved before continuing analyses. 9.7.2 Until sufficient data become available, usually a minimum of results from 20-30 analyses, each laboratory should assess laboratory perfor- mance against the control limits in Section 9.3.2 that are derived from the data in Table 2. When sufficient internal performance data become available, develop control limits from the mean percent recovery (X) and standard deviation (S) of the percent recovery. These data are used to establish upper and lower control limits as follows: UPPER CONTROL LIMIT = X + 3S LOWER CONTROL LIMIT = X - 3S 515.2-14 ------- After each 5-10 new recovery measurements, new control limits should be calculated using only the most recent 20-30 data points. These calculated control limits should never exceed those established in Section 9.3.2. 9.7.3 Method detection limits (MDL) must be determined using the proce- dure given in reference8. The MDLs must be sufficient to detect analytes at the required levels according to SDWA regulations. 9.7.4 At least quarterly, analyze a QCS (Section 3.13) from an outside source. 9.7.5 Laboratories are encouraged to participate in external performance evaluation studies such as the laboratory certification programs offered by many states or the studies conducted by USEPA. Assessing Analyte Recovery Laboratory Fortified Sample Matrix (LFM) 9.8.1 Each laboratory must analyze a LFM for 10% of the samples or one sample concentration per set, whichever is greater. The concentration should not be less then the background concentration of the sample selected for fortification. Ideally, the concentration should be the same as that used for the laboratory fortified blank (Section 9.7). Over time, samples from all routine sample sources should be fortified. 9.8.2 Calculate the percent recovery, P of the concentration for each analyte, after correcting the measured concentration, X, from the fortified sample for the background concentration, b, measured in the unfortified sample. P = 100 (X - b) / fortified concentration, and compare these values to control limits appropriate for reagent water data collected in the same fashion. If the analyzed unfortified sample is found to contain NO background concentrations and the added concentrations are those specified in Section 9.7, then the appro- priate control limits would be the acceptance limits in Section 9.7. If, on the other hand, the analyzed unfortified sample is found to contain background concentration, b, estimate the standard deviation at the background concentration, sb, using regressions or comparable back- ground data and, similarly, estimate the mean, Xa and standard deviation, sa, of analytical results at the total concentration after fortifying. Then the appropriate percentage control limits would be P ±3sP , where: P = 100X / (b + fortifying concentration) and sP = 100 (s2 + s^)172/fortifying concentration 515.2-15 ------- For example, if the background concentration for Analyte A was found to be 1 Hg/L and the added amount was also 1 Hg/L, and upon analysis the laboratory fortified sample measured 1.6 Hg/L, then the calculated P for this sample would be (1.6 Hg/L minus 1.0 |ig/L)/l ]ig/L or 60%. This calculated P is compared to control limits derived from prior reagent water data. Assume that analysis of an interference free sample at 1 ]Jg/L yields_an s of 0.12 Hg/L and similar analysis at 2.0 Hg/L yields X and s of 2.01 Hg/L and 0.20 \ig/L, respectively. The appropriate limits to judge the reasonableness of the percent recovery, 60%, obtained on the fortified matrix sample is computed as follows: [100 (2.01 (xg/L) / 2.0 (xg/L] ±3 (100) [(0.12 ng/L)2 + (0.20 (ig/L)2],/2/1.0 (xg/L = 100.5% ± 300 (0.233) = 100.5% ± 70% or 30% to 170 recovery of the added analyte. 9.8.3 If the recovery of any such analyte falls outside the designated range, and the laboratory performance for that analyte is shown to be in control (Section 9.7), the recovery problem encountered with the fortified sample is judged to be matrix related, not system related. The result for that analyte in the unfortified sample is labeled suspect/matrix to inform the data user that the results are suspect due to matrix effects. 9.9 Assessing Instrument System/Instrument Performance Check (IPC) Sample Instrument performance should be monitored on a daily basis by analysis of the IPC sample. The IPC sample contains compounds designed to indicate appropriate instrument sensitivity, column performance (primary column) and chromatographic performance. IPC sample components and performance criteria are listed in Table 11. Inability to demonstrate acceptable instrument performance indicates the need for reevaluation of the instrument system. The sensitivity requirements are set based on the MDLs published in this method. MDLs will vary from laboratory to laboratory. 9.10 The laboratory may adopt additional QC practices for use with this method. The specific practices that are most productive depend upon the needs of the laboratory and the nature of the samples. For example, field or laboratory duplicates may be analyzed to assess the precision of the environmental measurements or field reagent blanks may be used to assess contamination of samples under site conditions, transportation, and storage. 515.2-16 ------- 10.0 CALIBRATION AND STANDARDIZATION 10.1 Establish GC operating parameters equivalent to those indicated in Section 6.12. This calibration procedure employs procedural standards, i.e., fortified aqueous standards which are processed through most of the method (Section 11.0). The GC system is calibrated by means of the internal standard technique (Section 10.2). NOTE: Calibration standard solutions must be prepared such that no unresolved analytes are mixed together (See Table 1). 10.2 Internal Standard Calibration Procedure To use this approach, the analyst must select one or more internal standards compatible in analytical behavior to the compounds of interest. The analyst must further demonstrate that the measurement of the internal standard is not affected by method or matrix interferences. DBOB (Section 7.13) has been identified as a suitable internal standard. 10.2.1 Prepare aqueous calibration standards at a minimum of three (five are recommended) concentration levels for each method analyte as follows: for each concentration, fill a 250 mL volumetric flask with 240 mL of reagent water at pH 1 and containing 20% by weight of dissolved sodium sulfate. Add an appropriate aliquot of the primary dilution standard (Section 7.16.4) and dilute to 250 mL with the same reagent water. Process each aqueous calibration sample through the analytical procedure beginning with Section 11.2, i.e., omit the hydrolysis and cleanup step (Section 11.1). The lowest calibration standard should represent analyte concentrations near, but above, the respective MDLs. The remaining standards should bracket the analyte concentrations expected in the sample extracts, or should define the working range of the detector. The internal standard is added to the final 5 mL extract as specified in Section 11.0. 10.2.2 Analyze each calibration standard according to the procedure beginning in Section 11.2. Tabulate response (peak height or area) against concentration for each compound and internal standard. Calculate the response factor (RF) for each analyte and surrogate using Equation 1. Equation 1 (Ais) (Cs) where: As = Response for the analyte to be measured. Ais = Response for the internal standard. Cis = Concentration of the internal standard (|ig/L). Cs = Concentration of the analyte to be measured (|ig/L). 515.2-17 ------- 10.2.3 If the RF value over the working range is constant (30% RSD or less) the average RF can be used for calculations. Alternatively, the results can be used to plot a calibration curve of response ratios (As/Ais) vs. Cs. A data station may be used to collect the chromatographic data, calculate response factors and generate linear or second order regression curves. 10.2.4 The working calibration curve or RF must be verified on each working shift by the measurement of one or more calibration standards. A new calibration standard need not be derivatized each day. The same standard extract can be used up to 14 days. If the response for any analyte varies from the predicted response by more than ±30%, the test must be repeated using a fresh calibration standard. If the repetition also fails, a new calibration curve must be generated for that analyte using freshly prepared standards. 10.2.5 Verify calibration standards periodically, at least quarterly is recommended, by analyzing a standard prepared from reference material obtained from an independent source. Results from these analyses must be within the limits used to routinely check calibration. 11.0 PROCEDURE 11.1 Manual Hydrolysis and Clean-up 11.1.1 Remove the sample bottles from cold storage and allow them to equilibrate to room temperature. Acidify and add sodium thiosulfate to blanks and QC check standards as specified in Section 8.0. 11.1.2 Measure a 250 mL aliquot of each sample with a 250 mL graduated cylinder and pour into a 500 mL separatory funnel. Add 250 |iL of the surrogate primary dilution standard (Section 7.18) to each 250 mL sample. The surrogate will be at a concentration of 2 Hg/L. Dissolve 50 g sodium sulfate in the sample. 11.1.3 Add 4 mL of 6 N NaOH to each sample, seal, and shake. Check the pH of the sample with pH paper or a pH meter; if the sample does not have a pH greater than or equal to 12, adjust the pH by adding more 6 N NaOH. Let the sample sit at room temperature for one hour, shaking the separatory funnel and contents periodically. 11.1.4 Add 15 mL methylene chloride to the graduated cylinder to rinse the walls, transfer the methylene chloride to the separatory funnel and extract the sample by vigorously shaking the funnel for two minutes with periodic venting to release excess pressure. Allow the organic layer to separate from the water phase for a minimum of 10 minutes. If the emulsion interface between layers is more than one-third the volume of the solvent layer, the analyst must employ mechanical 515.2-18 ------- techniques to complete the phase separation. The optimum technique depends upon the sample, but may include stirring, filtration through glass wool, centrifugation, or other physical methods. Discard the methylene chloride phase. 11.1.5 Add a second 15 mL volume of methylene chloride to the separatory funnel and repeat the extraction procedure a second time, discarding the methylene chloride layer. Perform a third extraction in the same manner. 11.1.6 Drain the contents of the separatory funnel into a 500 mL beaker. Adjust the pH to 1.0 ±0.1 by the dropwise addition of concentrated sulfuric acid with constant stirring. Monitor the pH with a pH meter (Section 6.8) or short range (0-3) pH paper (Section 6.14). 11.2 Sample Extraction 11.2.1 Vacuum manifold Assemble a manifold (Section 6.3) consisting of six to eight vacuum flasks with filter funnels (Sections 6.1 and 6.2). Individual vacuum control, on-off and vacuum release valves and vacuum gauges are desirable. Place the 47 mm extraction disks (Section 7.1) on the filter frits. 11.2.2 Add 20 mL of 10% by volume of methanol in MTBE to the top of each disk without vacuum and allow the solvent to remain for two minutes. Turn on full vacuum and pull the solvent through the disks, followed by room air for five minutes. 11.2.3 Adjust the vacuum to approximately 5 in. (mercury) and add the following in series to the filter funnel (a) 20 mL methanol (b) 20 mL reagent water (c) sample. Do not allow the disk to dry between steps and maintain the vacuum at 5 in. 11.2.4 After the sample is extracted completely, apply maximum vacuum and draw room air through the disks for 20 minutes. 11.2.5 Place the culture tubes (Section 6.4) in the vacuum tubes to collect the eluates. Elute the disks with two each 2 mL aliquots of 10% methanol in MTBE. Allow each aliquot to remain on the disk for one min before applying vacuum. 11.2.6 Rinse each 500 mL beaker (Section 11.1.6) with 4 mL of pure MTBE and elute the disk with this solvent as in Section 11.2.5. 11.2.7 Remove the culture tubes and cap. 515.2-19 ------- 11.3 Extract Preparation 11.3.1 Pre-rinse the drying tubes (Section 7.5.1) with 2 mL of MTBE. 11.3.2 Remove the entire extract with a 5 mL pipet and drain the lower aqueous layer back into the culture tube. Add the organic layer to the sodium sulfate drying tube (Section 7.5.1). Maintain liquid in the drying tube between this and subsequent steps. Collect the dried extract in a 15 mL graduated centrifuge tube or a 10 mL Kuderna- Danish tube. 11.3.3 Rinse the culture tube with an additional 1 mL of MTBE and repeat Section 11.3.2. 11.3.4 Repeat step Section 11.3.3 and finally add a 1 mL aliquot of MTBE to the drying tube before it empties. The final volume should be 6-9 mL. In this form the extract is esterified as described below. 11.4 Extract Esterification 11.4.1 Assemble the diazomethane generator (Figure 1) in a hood. 11.4.2 Add 5 mL of ethyl ether to Tube 1. Add 4 mL of Diazald solution (Section 7.12) and 3 mL of 37% KOH solution (Section 7.15.1) to the reaction Tube 2. Immediately place the exit tube into the collection tube containing the sample extract. Apply nitrogen flow (10 mL/min) to bubble diazo-methane through the extract. Each charge of the generator should be sufficient to esterify four samples. The appearance of a persistent yellow color is an indication that esterification is complete. The first sample should require 30 seconds to one minute and each subsequent sample somewhat longer. The final sample may require two to three minutes. 11.4.3 Cap each collection tube and allow to remain stored at room temperature in a hood for 30 minutes. No significant fading of the yellow color should occur during this period. Fortify each sample with 100 |iL of the internal standard primary dilution solution (Section 7.17) and reduce the volume to 5.0 mL with the analytical concentrator (Section 6.10), a stream of dry nitrogen, or an equivalent concentration technique. NOTE: The excess diazomethane is volatilized from the extract during the concentration procedure. 11.4.4 Cap the tubes and store in a refrigerator if further processing will not be performed immediately. Analyze by GC-ECD. 515.2-20 ------- 11.5 Gas Chromatography 11.5.1 Section 6.12 summarizes the recommended GC operating conditions. Included in Table 1 are retention times observed using this method. Figures 2A and 2B illustrate the chromatographic performance of the primary column (Section 6.12.1) for Groups A and B of the method analytes. Other GC columns, chromatographic conditions, or detectors may be used if the requirements of Section 9.3 are met. 11.5.2 Calibrate the system daily as described in Section 10.0. 11.5.3 Inject 2 |iL of the sample extract. Record the resulting peak size in area units. 11.5.4 If the response for any sample peak exceeds the working range of the detector, dilute the extract and reanalyze. 11.6 Identification of Analytes 11.6.1 Identify a sample component by comparison of its retention time to the retention time of a reference chromatogram. If the retention time of an unknown compound corresponds, within limits, to the retention time of a standard compound, then an analyte is considered to be identified. 11.6.2 The width of the retention time window used to make identifications should be based upon measurements of actual retention time variations of standards over the course of a day. Three times the standard deviation of a retention time can be used to calculate a suggested window size for a compound. However, the experience of the analyst should weigh heavily in interpretation of chromatograms. 11.6.3 Identification requires expert judgment when sample components are not resolved chromatographically. When GC peaks obviously represent more than one sample component (i.e., broadened peak with shoulder (s) or valley between two or more maxima, or any time doubt exists over the identification of a peak in a chromatogram, appropriate alternative techniques to help confirm peak identification need to be employed. For example, more positive identification may be made by the use of an alternative detector which operates on a chemical/physical principle different from that originally used, e.g., mass spectrometry, or the use of a second chromatography column. A suggested alternative column is described in Section 6.12.2. 515.2-21 ------- 12.0 DATA ANALYSIS AND CALCULATIONS 12.1 Calculate analyte concentrations in the sample from the response for the analyte using the calibration procedure described in Section 10.0. 12.2 Calculate the concentration (C) in the sample using the response factor (RF) determined in Section 10.2.2 and Equation 2, or determine sample concentration from the calibration curve (Section 10.2.3). Equation 2 (As) ds) C (xg/L) = (A. ) (RF) (Vo) where: As = Response for the parameter to be measured. Ais = Response for the internal standard. Is = Amount of internal standard added to each extract (|ig). VQ = Volume of water extracted (L). 13.0 METHOD PERFORMANCE 13.1 In a single laboratory, analyte recoveries from reagent water were determined at three concentration levels, Tables 2-4. Results were used to determine the analyte MDLs8 listed in Table 2. 13.2 In a single laboratory, analyte recoveries from dechlorinated tap water were determined at two concentrations, Tables 5 and 6. In addition, analyte recoveries were determined at two concentrations from an ozonated surface (river) water, Tables 7 and 8, and at one level from a high humectant surface (reservoir) water, Table 10. Finally, a holding study was conducted on the preserved, ozonated surface water and recovery data are presented for Day 1 and Day 14 of this study, Tables 8 and 9. The ozonated surface water was chosen as the matrix in which to study analyte stability during a 14-day holding time because it was very biologically active. 14.0 POLLUTION PREVENTION 14.1 This method utilizes the new liquid-solid extraction technology which requires the use of very small quantities of organic solvents. This feature eliminates the hazards involved with the use of large volumes of potentially harmful organic solvents needed for conventional liquid-liquid extractions. Also, mercuric chloride, a highly toxic and environmentally hazardous chemical, has been replaced with hydrochloric acid as the sample preservative. These features make this method much safer and a great deal less harmful to the environment. Some of the phenolic herbicides on the analyte list are very difficult to methylate and diazomethane is still required to derivatize these compounds. 515.2-22 ------- 14.2 For information about pollution prevention that may be applicable to laboratory operations, consult "Less is Better: Laboratory Chemical Management for Waste Reduction" available from the American Chemical Society's Department of Government Relations and Science Policy, 1155 16th Street N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036. 15.0 WASTE MANAGEMENT 15.1 Due to the nature of this method, there is little need for waste management. No large volumes of solvents or hazardous chemicals are used. The matrices of concern are finished drinking water or source water. However, the Agency requires that laboratory waste management practices be conducted consistent with all applicable rules and regulations, and that laboratories protect the air, water, and land by minimizing and controlling all releases from fume hoods and bench operations. Also, compliance is required with any sewage discharge permits and regulations, particularly the hazardous waste identification rules and land disposal restrictions. For further information on waste management, consult "The Waste Management Manual for Laboratory Personnel," also available from the American Chemical Society at the address in Section 14.2. 16.0 REFERENCES 1. ASTM Annual Book of Standards, Part 11, Volume 11.02, D3694-82, "Standard Practice for Preparation of Sample Containers and for Preservation," American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, p. 86, 1986. 2. Giam, C.S., Chan, H.S., and Nef, G.S. "Sensitive Method for Determination of Phthalate Ester Plasticizers in Open-Ocean Biota Samples," Analytical Chemistry. 47. 2225 (1975). 3. Giam, C.S. and Chan, H.S. "Control of Blanks in the Analysis of Phthalates in Air and Ocean Biota Samples," U.S. National Bureau of Standards, Special Publication 442, pp. 701-708, 1976. 4. "Carcinogens - Working with Carcinogens," Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Center for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Publication No. 77-206, August 1977. 5. "OSHA Safety and Health Standards, General Industry," (29 CFR 1910), Occupational Safety and Health Administration, OSHA 2206, (Revised, January 1976). 6. "Safety in Academic Chemistry Laboratories," American Chemical Society Publication, Committee on Chemical Safety, 3rd Edition, 1979. 515.2-23 ------- 7. ASTM Annual Book of Standards, Part 11, Volume 11.01, D3370-82, "Standard Practice for Sampling Water," American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, p. 130, 1986. 8. Glaser, J.A., Foerst, D.L., McKee, G.D., Quave, S.A., and Budde, W.L. "Trace Analyses for Wastewaters," Environ. Sci. Technol. 1981, JJ3, 1426-1435. 9. 40 CFR, Part 136, Appendix B. 515.2-24 ------- 17.0 TABLES. DIAGRAMS. FLOWCHARTS AND VALIDATION DATA TABLE 1. RETENTION DATA Retention Time (min)° Analyte Group3 Primary Confirmation 3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid A 16.72 18.98 2,4-Dichlorophenylacetic acid (SA) A,B 19.78 22.83 Dicamba B 20.18 23.42 Dichlorprop A 22.53 25.90 2,4-D B 23.13 27.01 4,4' -Dibromooctafluorobipheny 1 (IS) A,B 24.26 26.57 Pentachlorophenol A 25.03 27.23 Silvex B 25.82 29.08 5-Hydroxydicamba B 26.28 30.18 2,4,5-T A 26.57 30.33 2,4-DB B 27.95 31.47 Dinoseb A 28.03 33.02 Bentazon B 28.70 33.58 Picloram B 29.93 35.90 Dacthal A 31.02 34.32 Acifluorfen B 35.62 40.58 aAnalytes were divided into two groups during method development to avoid chromatographic overlap. bColumns and chromatographic conditions are described in Section 6.12. 515.2-25 ------- TABLE 2. SINGLE LABORATORY RECOVERY, PRECISION DATA AND METHOD DETECTION LIMIT WITH FORTIFIED REAGENT WATER - LEVEL 1 Analyte Fortified Cone. (Pg/L) Mean3 Recovery (%) Relative Std. Dev. (%) MDL (l-ig/L) Acifluorfen 0.50 70 21 0.25 Bentazon 2.50 70 11 0.63 2,4-D 0.25 96 38 0.28 2,4-DB 2.50 79 12 0.72 Dacthalb 0.25 96 16 0.13 Dicamba 0.75 109 11 0.28 3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid 1.25 126 24 1.23 Dichlorprop 0.25 106 15 0.13 Dinoseb 0.50 87 22 0.28 5-Hydroxydicamba 0.75 90 12 0.25 Pentachlorophenol 0.25 103 18 0.16 Picloram 0.75 95 15 0.35 2,4,5-T 0.25 116 18 0.16 2,4,5-TP 0.25 98 9 0.06 aBased on the analyses of seven replicates. bMeasurement includes the mono- and diacid metabolites. 515.2-26 ------- TABLE 3. SINGLE LABORATORY RECOVERY AND PRECISION DATA FOR FORTIFIED REAGENT WATER - LEVEL 2 Fortified Mean3 Relative Cone. Recovery Std. Dev. Analyte (l-ig/L) (%) (%) Acifluorfen 0.80 61 27 Bentazon 4.0 81 8 2,4-D 0.40 96 38 2,4-DB 4.0 90 13 Dacthalb 0.40 96 16 Dicamba 1.20 109 11 3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid 2.00 126 24 Dichlorprop 0.40 76 21 Dinoseb 0.80 87 22 5-Hydroxydicamba 1.20 90 12 Pentachlorophenol 0.40 66 26 Picloram 1.20 68 21 2,4,5-T 0.40 116 18 2,4,5-TP 0.40 105 7 aBased on the analyses of six to seven replicates. bMeasurement includes the mono- and diacid metabolites. 515.2-27 ------- TABLE 4. SINGLE LABORATORY RECOVERY AND PRECISION DATA FOR FORTIFIED REAGENT WATER - LEVEL 3 Fortified Mean3 Relative Cone. Recovery Std. Dev. Analyte (Pg/L) (%) (%) Acifluorfen 2.0 59 13 Bentazon 10.0 68 8 2,4-D 1.0 90 20 2,4-DB 10.0 74 6 Dacthalb 1.0 60 10 Dicamba 3.0 75 9 3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid 5.0 62 18 Dichlorprop 1.0 97 17 Dinoseb 2.0 63 10 5-Hydroxydicamba 3.0 77 8 Pentachlorophenol 1.0 69 11 Picloram 3.0 66 9 2,4,5-T 1.0 64 15 2,4,5-TP 1.0 68 8 aBased on the analyses of six to seven replicates. bMeasurement includes the mono- and diacid metabolites. 515.2-28 ------- TABLE 5. SINGLE LABORATORY RECOVERY AND PRECISION DATA FOR FORTIFIED, DECHLORINATED TAP WATER - LEVEL 1 Fortified Mean3 Relative Cone. Recovery Std. Dev. Analyte (Pg/L) (%) (%) Acifluorfen 0.50 117 21 Bentazon 2.50 96 12 2,4-D 0.25 59c 55 2,4-DB 2.50 112 15 Dacthalb 0.25 101 10 Dicamba 0.75 91 14 3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid 1.25 103 15 Dichlorprop 0.25 218d 37 Dinoseb 0.50 134 10 5-Hydroxydicamba 0.75 90 14 Pentachlorophenol 0.25 91 8 Picloram 0.75 76 28 2,4,5-T 0.25 118 16 2,4,5-TP 0.25 99 10 aBased on the analyses of six to seven replicates. bMeasurement includes the mono- and diacid metabolites. C2,4-D background value was 0.29 Hg/L. dProbable interference. 515.2-29 ------- TABLE 6. SINGLE LABORATORY RECOVERY AND PRECISION DATA FOR FORTIFIED, DECHLORINATED TAP WATER - LEVEL 2 Fortified Mean3 Relative Cone. Recovery Std. Dev. Analyte (Pg/L) (%) (%) Acifluorfen 2.0 150 7 Bentazon 10.0 112 9 2,4-D 1.0 90 16 2,4-DB 10.0 111 10 Dacthalb 1.0 118 8 Dicamba 3.0 86 10 3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid 5.0 111 5 Dichlorprop 1.0 88 30 Dinoseb 2.0 121 6 5-Hydroxydicamba 3.0 96 6 Pentachlorophenol 1.0 96 6 Picloram 3.0 132 12 2,4,5-T 1.0 108 10 2,4,5-TP 1.0 115 7 2,4-Dichlorophenylacetic acidc 1.0 120 19 aBased on the analyses of six to seven replicates. bMeasurement includes the mono- and diacid metabolites. Surrogate analyte. 515.2-30 ------- TABLE 7. SINGLE LABORATORY RECOVERY AND PRECISION DATA FOR FORTIFIED, OZONATED SURFACE WATER - LEVEL 1 Fortified Mean3 Relative Cone. Recovery Std. Dev. Analyte (|Jg/L) (%) (%) Acifluorfen 0.50 172 14 Bentazon 2.50 92 22 2,4-D 0.25 127 13 2,4-DB 2.50 154 19 Dacthalb 0.25 113 17 Dicamba 0.75 107 13 3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid 1.25 100 17 Dichlorprop 0.25 115 20 Dinoseb 0.50 134 28 5-Hydroxydicamba 0.75 89 13 Pentachlorophenol 0.25 110 22 Picloram 0.75 109 27 2,4,5-T 0.25 102 19 2,4,5-TP 0.25 127 8 2,4-Dichlorophenylacetic acidc 0.25 72 31 aBased on the analyses of six to seven replicates. bMeasurement includes the mono- and diacid metabolites. Surrogate analyte. 515.2-31 ------- TABLE 8. SINGLE LABORATORY RECOVERY AND PRECISION DATA FOR FORTIFIED, OZONATED SURFACE WATER - LEVEL 2, STABILITY STUDY DAY lc Fortified Mean3 Relative Cone. Recovery Std. Dev. Analyte (l-ig/L) (%) (%) Acitluorfen 2.0 173 11 Bentazon 10.0 122 7 2,4-D 1.0 126 10 2,4-DB 10.0 130 7 Dacthalb 1.0 116 11 Dicamba 3.0 109 9 3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid 5.0 115 11 Dichlorprop 1.0 116 11 Dinoseb 2.0 116 9 5-Hydroxydicamba 3.0 121 9 Pentachlorophenol 1.0 118 10 Picloram 3.0 182 14 2,4,5-T 1.0 112 9 2,4,5-TP 1.0 122 10 2,4-Dichlorophenylacetic acidd 1.0 110 26 aBased on the analyses of six to seven replicates. bMeasurement includes the mono- and diacid metabolites. cSamples preserved at pH = 2.0. Surrogate analyte. 515.2-32 ------- TABLE 9. SINGLE LABORATORY RECOVERY AND PRECISION DATA FOR FORTIFIED, OZONATED SURFACE WATER - LEVEL 2, STABILITY STUDY DAY 14c Fortified Mean3 Relative Cone. Recovery Std. Dev. Analyte (Pg/L) (%) (%) Acifluorfen 2.0 151 18 Bentazon 10.0 97 9 2,4-D 1.0 84 11 2,4-DB 10.0 128 10 Dacthalb 1.0 116 7 Dicamba 3.0 103 9 3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid 5.0 81 12 Dichlorprop 1.0 107 11 Dinoseb 2.0 118 7 5-Hydroxydicamba 3.0 20 14 Pentachlorophenol 1.0 94 7 Picloram 3.0 110 32 2,4,5-T 1.0 113 8 2,4,5-TP 1.0 113 11 2,4-Dichlorophenylacetic acidd 1.0 87 6 aBased on the analyses of six to seven replicates. bMeasurement includes the mono- and diacid metabolites. cSamples preserved at pH = 2.0. Surrogate analyte. 515.2-33 ------- TABLE 10. SINGLE LABORATORY RECOVERY AND PRECISION DATA FOR FORTIFIED, HIGH HUMIC CONTENT SURFACE WATER Fortified Mean3 Relative Cone. Recovery Std. Dev. Analyte (Pg/L) (%) (%) Acifluorfen 2.0 120 13 Bentazon 10.0 87 11 2,4-D 1.0 59 7 2,4-DB 10.0 80 14 Dacthalb 1.0 100 6 Dicamba 3.0 76 9 3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid 5.0 87 4 Dichlorprop 1.0 110 22 Dinoseb 2.0 97 6 5-Hydroxydicamba 3.0 82 9 Pentachlorophenol 1.0 70 5 Picloram 3.0 124 9 2,4,5-T 1.0 101 4 2,4,5-TP 1.0 80 6 aBased on the analyses of six to seven replicates. bMeasurement includes the mono- and diacid metabolites. 515.2-34 ------- TABLE 11. LABORATORY PERFORMANCE CHECK SOLUTION Test Analyte Cone, Hg/mL Requirements Sensitivity Dinoseb 0.004 Detection of analyte; S/N >3 Chromatographic performance 4-Nitrophenol 1.6 0.70 < PGF <1.05 Column performance 3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid 0.6 Resolution >0.40b 4-Nitrophenol 1.6 aPGF - peak Gaussian factor. Calculated using the equation: PGF _ 1-83 x W (1/2) W (1/10) where: W(l/2) is the peak width at half height and W(l/10) is the peak width at tenth height. bResolution between the two peaks as defined by the equation: R = W where: t is the difference in elution times between the two peaks and W is the average peak width, at the baseline, of the two peaks. ------- n, aow* FIGURE 1. DIAZOMETHANE GENERATOR 515.2-36 ------- DiCflUL On [NJ 00 -<1 4.00- £ 3.00 o > IF* t> *4 K 2.00- 1.00- jsocn I 1.50 II SU» "F DIWSRI J4ST vv* LvjJkJc=: 2.00 2.50 x 101 i | 3.00 ¦inutes , 3.50 Figure 2A. Chromatogran of Group A Analytes Extracted From Ozonated Surface Water (bottota chromatogran is the laboratory reagent blank) ------- DICAH1A Figure 28. Chromatogram of Group B Analytes Extracted Fro«i Ozonated Surface Water (bottom chromatogram is the laboratory reagent blank) ------- |