FOURTH FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT
FCX, INC. (STATESVILLE) SUPERFUND SITE
STATESVILLE, IREDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
oEPA
AUGUST 2021
Prepared by
Maurice L.
Horsey, IV
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region 4
Atlanta, Georgia
Digitally signed by Maurice L.
Horsey, IV
Date: 2021.08.30 11:15:56
-04'00' August 30, 2021
Randall ChafFins, Acting Director
Superfund & Emergency Management Division
Date
-------
'This page left intentionally blank
11
-------
Table of Contents
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS v
I. INTRODUCTION 1
Site Background 1
FIVE-YEAR REVIEW SUMMARY FORM 2
II. RESPONSE ACTION SUMMARY 3
Basis for Taking Action 3
Response Actions for OU-1 4
Status of Implementation - OU-1 7
Institutional Control Review 9
Systems Operations/Operation and Maintenance (O&M) - OU-1 12
III. PROGRESS SINCE THE PREVIOUS REVIEW 14
IV. FIVE-YEAR REVIEW PROCESS 14
Community Notification, Community Involvement and Site Interviews 14
Data Review for OU-1 and OU-3 15
Site Inspection 17
V. TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT 18
QUESTION A: Is the remedy functioning as intended by the decision documents9 18
QUESTION B: Are the exposure assumptions, toxicity data, cleanup levels and RAOs used at the
time of the remedy selection still valid9 19
QUESTION C: Has any other information come to light that could call into question the
protectiveness of the remedy9 22
VI. ISSUES/RECOMMENDATIONS 23
VII. PROTECTIVENESS STATEMENT 24
VIII. NEXT REVIEW 25
Tables
Table 1: OU-1 2006 ROD Amendment Groundwater ARARs 5
Table 2: OlJ-2 1994 ROD Soil ARARs 6
Table 3: OlJ-3 2006 ESD Groundwater ARAR 7
Table 4: Summary of Implemented Institutional Controls (ICs) OU-1 9
Table 5: Summary of Implemented Institutional Controls (ICs) OlJ-2 10
Table 5: Summary of Implemented Institutional Controls (ICs) OlJ-3 1 1
Table 7: OU-1 O&M Costs Over the FYR Period 12
Table 8: OlJ-3 O&M Costs Over the FYR Period 13
Table 9: Protectiveness Determinations/Statements from the 2015 FYR Report 13
Table 10: Status of Recommendations from the 2015 FYR Report 14
Table 11: OU-1 Groundwater ARAR Comparison of Remediation Goals and Current Standards 19
Table 12: OU-1 Results of VISL Evaluation of the Groundwater Remediation Goals 20
Table 13: OlJ-3 Groundwater ARAR Comparison of Remediation Goals and Current Standards 21
Table 14: OlJ-3 Results of VISL Evaluation of the Groundwater Remediation Goals 21
iii
-------
Figures
Figure 1: Site Location Map D-1
Figure 2: Detailed Site Map D-2
Figure 3: Monitoring Well Locations D-3A/B
Figure 4: Institutional Control DPLlJRs D-4 A/B
Appendix
APPENDIX A
REFERENCE LIST
APPENDIX B
SITE CHRONOLOGY
APPENDIX C
SITE INSPECTION CHECKLISTS
APPENDIX D
FIGURES
APPENDIX E
CURRENT SITE STATUS
APPENDIX F
ARAR REVIEW
APPENDIX G
COMMUNITY RELATIONS
APPENDIX H
OU-1 2020 MNA O&M MONITORING WELL SAMPLING
APPENDIX I
REPORT OU-3 2020 ANNUAL REMEDIAL ACTION REPORT
APPENDIX J
NORTH CAROLINA WELL CONSTRUCTION ACT
APPENDIX K
DECLARATION OF PERPETUAL LAND USE RESTRICTIONS
iv
-------
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
ANA
Accelerated Natural Attenuation
ARAR
Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirement
AROD
Record of Decision Amendment
AS
Air Sparging
BRA
Baseline Risk Assessment
CERCLA
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
CFR
Code of Federal Regulation
COC
Contaminant of Concern
CRQL
Contract Required Quantitation Limit
DDD
Di chl orodi phenyl di chl oroethane
DDE
Di chl orodi phenyl di chloroethyl ene
DDT
Di chl orodiphenyltri chl oroethane
DPLUR
Declaration of Perpetual Land Use Restrictions
EPA
Environmental Protection Agency
EPNG
El Paso Natural Gas
ESD
Explanation of Significant Difference
FCX
Farmer's Cooperative Exchange
FS
Feasibility Study
FYR
Five-Year Review
IC
Institutional Controls
MCL
Maximum Contaminant Level
mg/kg
M i 11 i gram/ki 1 ogram
MNA
Monitored Natural Attenuation
MW
Monitoring Well
NC
North Carolina
NC 2L
North Carolina Groundwater Standard
NCDEQ
North Carolina Department of Environment Quality
NCP
National Contingency Plan
NPL
National Priorities List
O&M
Operation and Maintenance
OCP
Organochlorine Pesticide
OU
Operable Unit
PCE
T etrachl oroethene
PCP
Pentachlorophenol
PID
Parcel Identification Number
POTW
Publicly Owned Treatment Works
RAO
Remedial Action Objective
RD
Remedial Design
RI
Remedial Investigation
ROD
Record of Decision
RPM
Remedial Project Manager
svoc
Semi-Volatile Organic Compound
SVE
Soil Vapor Extraction
Hg/L
Microgram per Liter
voc
Volatile Organic Compound
v
-------
I. INTRODUCTION
The purpose of a five-year review (FYR) is to evaluate the implementation and performance of a remedy
to determine if the remedy is and will continue to be protective of human health and the environment.
The methods, findings and conclusions of reviews are documented in FYR reports such as this one.
In addition, FYR reports identify issues found during the review, if any, and document
recommendations to address them.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is preparing this FYR pursuant to the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Section 121, consistent with the
National Contingency Plan (NCP) (40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 300.430(f)(4)(ii)) and
considering EPA policy.
This is the fourth FYR for the Site. The triggering action for this statutory review is the completion date
of the previous FYR. The FYR has been prepared because hazardous substances, pollutants or
contaminants remain at the Site above levels that allow for unlimited use and unrestricted exposure
(UU/UE).
The EPA remedial project manager (RPM) Allan Hernandez led the FYR. Participants included EPA
Community Involvement Coordinator Angela Miller, North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality (NCDEQ) project manager Beth Hartzell, and NCDEQ FYR preparer Stephanie Grubbs.
Appendix A provides a list of the Documents used to prepare this FYR Report. Appendix B provides a
brief site chronology. Appendix E includes Site status information.
Site Background
Due to the complexity of the Site, the EPA divided the remedial actions into three different operable
units (OUs).
• OU-1 addresses contaminated groundwater at the former Farmer's Cooperative Exchange (FCX)
property.
• OU-2 addressed contaminated soil at the former FCX property. The OU-2 soil remedy was
completed in 2001 Therefore, any reference in this FYR to OlJ-2 (soil) is historical. No soil
sampling or updates were conducted, analyzed, or reviewed for this FYR.
• OU-3 addresses contaminated soil and groundwater at the former Burlington Industries, Inc.
(Burlington) property.
The 15.5-acre Site consists of the former FCX property, the former Burlington property, and nearby
properties contaminated by the former textile manufacturing operations, including the impacted property
parcels located north of the former textile property. The Site is in a mixed industrial, commercial and
residential area at the intersection of Phoenix Street and West Front Street (Highway 90), approximately
1.5 miles west of downtown Statesville, North Carolina. Appendix D, Figure D-l shows the Site location
map.
The former FCX property is approximately 5.5 acres in size. Prior to the late 1960s, the main structures
on the former FCX property included a U-shaped building used for pesticide operations, and several
buildings on the eastern half of the property used for the milling and bagging of feed grains. A small
office building was also present near the southeastern corner of the property. During the late 1960's,
most of these buildings (except for the small office building) were demolished. A large brick warehouse
was constructed on Site around 1969 and 1970, and a smaller metal warehouse painted blue was
1
-------
constructed in 1982. An asphalt parking lot was paved between the warehouses and West Front Street.
The majority of the former FCX property to the east of the two warehouses is covered with gravel, and
contains a large, reinforced slab and smaller concrete tractor trailer pads. The former FCX property is
fenced except for the paved parking lot and loading dock area along West Front Street.
The former Burlington property is approximately 10 acres in size. Two large buildings, a warehouse,
and the main building cover much of the former Burlington property. The former Burlington property is
bounded on the north by a residential neighborhood, to the south by the Norfolk-Southern Railroad and
the former FCX property, to the west by an unspecified industrial plant, and to the east by
Phoenix Street. The former Burlington property is fenced except for the front parking area between the
former plant and Phoenix Street. Appendix D, Figure D-2 is a detailed Site map of the former FCX
property and Burlington textile properties.
The City of Statesville's Municipal Code (Section 23-276) requires all residents to use city-supplied
water. The use of private water wells within city limits is only permitted upon request and with
permission from the Iredell County Health Department.
FIVE-YEAR REV IEW SUMMARY FORM
siti: idi:m ii ic a i ion
Site Name: FCX, Inc. Statesville Plant
EPA ID: NCD095458527
| Region: 4
State: NC
City/County: States\ i 1 le/lrede 11 |
1
siti: s i a i t
1
NPL Status: Final
[
Multiple OUs?
Yes
Has the Site achieved construction completion?
Yes
Lead agency: EPA
Author name: Allan Hernandez
\\ S I A 11 S
Author affiliation: EPA with support provided by NCDEQ
Rev iew period: 10/5/2020 - 8/18/2021
Date of site inspection: NCDEQ conducted the Site Inspection for OU-1 on 10/19/2020 and AECOM
conducted the Site Inspection for OU-3 on January 20, 2021.
Type of rev iew: Statutory
Review number: 4
Triggering action date: 08/18/2016
Due date (fiveyears after triggering action date): 8/18/2021
2
-------
II. RESPONSE ACTION SUMMARY
Basis for Taking Action
The EPA conducted the remedial investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) at the former FCX property
from 1990 to 1993. The Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) on the former FCX property
identified a total of 13 pesticides in both surface and subsurface soil, including
Dichlorodipheny 1 trichloroethane (DDT), Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane (DDD),
dichlorodiphenyldichloroethy 1 ene (DDE), pentachlorophenol (PCP), alpha-chlordane, gamma-
chlordane, dieldrin, endrin, heptachlor, heptachlor epoxide, alpha-BBC, gamma-BHC (lindane) and
aldrin. The most widely identified pesticides in the soil were DDT and its transformation products DDD
and DDE.
A total of seven volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were identified in on-site groundwater monitoring
wells (MWs). Tetrachloroethene (PCE) and its degradation products cis-1,2-dichloroethene,
trichloroethene, 1,1,1-tri chl oroethane, 1,1 -dichloroethene and 1,1 -dichloroethane were the most
commonly identified VOCs in the on-site wells.
A baseline risk assessment (BRA) for the former FCX property was completed in July 1993. The BRA
defined and summarized unacceptable potential risks posed by the contamination described in the R1 for
the property. In summary, under previous land use conditions, no unacceptable carcinogenic or non-
carcinogenic risks to human health were identified based on direct contact exposure. However, several
future land use scenarios, including residential, were identified that pose unacceptable carcinogenic and
non-carcinogenic potential risks. These potential risks included the ingestion or inhalation of pesticides
and VOCs in the groundwater on the former FCX property by a future child or adult resident, and the
dermal contact or ingestion of surface soil contaminated with pesticides and PCP by a future child or
adult resident.
Potential risks to environmental receptors at or near the Site were evaluated based on surface water and
sediment sampling data collected on-site or from surface water near the Site. A review of the toxicity of
the chemicals of potential concern to potential ecological receptors was also conducted. Use of the Site
by terrestrial receptors such as birds and small mammals, particularly the area presently covered by the
two warehouses and parking lot, was considered unlikely given the lack of trees or other vegetative
cover at the Site. Based on a qualitative analysis, terrestrial wildlife communities in the low-lying and
wooded areas near the former FCX property are not likely to be significantly impacted.
Sitewide Contaminants of Concern (COCs):
OU-1 Groundwater
Chlordane, Dieldrin, Heptachlor Epoxide, Alpha-BHC, Beta-BHC, Gamma-BHC (Lindane)
(Table 1)
OU-2 Soil
Total pesticides, PCP (Table 2)
OU-3 Groundwater
Carbon Tetrachloride, Chloroform, 1,1-Dichloroethene, cis-1,2-Dichloroethene,
1,2-Dichloropropane, Methylene Chloride, Perchloroethene, 1,1,2-Tri chl oroethane,
Trichloroethene, Vinyl Chloride (Table 3)
3
-------
Response Actions for OlJ-1
1993 ROD
The EPA issued and signed the Record of Decision (ROD) for OU-1 on September 29, 1993, to address
groundwater contamination at the FCX portion of the Site. The major threat was determined to be
groundwater emanating from beneath the Site and the remedy was designed to address that concern.
Remedial Action Objectives (RAOs) for OU-1, as stated in the ROD, included:
• Contain the off-site migration of contaminated groundwater from the former FCX property and
to the south of the FCX property.
• Restore the aquifer to its unlimited use(s) by pumping and treating contaminated groundwater.
The remedial components selected to achieve the RAOs included:
• Extraction of groundwater at the FCX property and to the south of the FCX property that is
contaminated above Federal Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) or the North Carolina
Groundwater Standards, whichever are more protective.
• On-site treatment of extracted groundwater via Chemical Precipitation/Fi 1 tration and
Carbon Adsorption.
• Discharge of treated groundwater either to the local publicly owned treatment works (POTW) or
nearby surface water body.
• Monitoring of groundwater entering and exiting the treatment system, as well as monitoring of
the groundwater quality across the Site for an estimated 30 years.
• The use of deed restrictions in the affected area to prohibit the consumption of contaminated
groundwater.
2006 ROD Amendment
The 1993 OU-1 ROD was amended with a ROD Amendment (AROD) issued September 11, 2006.
The AROD altered the OU-1 groundwater remedy documented in the 1993 ROD from pump-and-
treat technology to MNA, and removed metals, VOCs and the compound bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
as COCs. The RAOs remain the same.
The new MNA remedy, as stated in the 2006 AROD, required:
• Baseline groundwater sampling for parameters needed to track the progress of natural
attenuation.
• Annual monitoring of chemical and natural attenuation parameters to document reduction of
pesticide concentration and mass and to evaluate the progress being made toward achieving the
remediation levels established in the AROD. The frequency of monitoring will be evaluated and
modified if needed. Table 1 presents groundwater remediation goals as specified in the AROD.
• Use of institutional controls (ICs) to prohibit the installation and use of drinking water wells on
the former FCX property, including implementation of restrictive covenants) pursuant to
North Carolina law and/or deed notice(s)), as well as monitoring compliance with the City of
Statesville's ordinance (Municipal Code Section 23-276). The ICs would prohibit the installation
and use of water wells within City limits without authorization from the Iredell County Health
Department, until which time the groundwater is deemed safe for drinking water purposes by the
EPA and NCDEQ.
4
-------
Table 1: OU-1 2006 AROD Groundwater Applicable or Relevant and
Appropriate Requirement (ARARs)
( OMiilll ii! 1 s = i"!i Of
("OiK'.Tii
2006 ROD
.'illK-nfillKill
i\ci!K'c!l;M!nn Cro;=
IhM)
2006 ROD
. ViK:i!!h!K:ni
('kmuip i e!
R;ii!on;;!c (m.u ! i
( ui'ivni % C
2La (As of
Ann! !. jHi!
(uuii
Mi icni
MCL/CRQL
(nui!
Chlordane
0.1
2L/CRQL
0.1
2/0.050
Dieldrin
0.1
CRQL
0.002
NA/0.10
Heptachlor epoxide
0.05
CRQL
0.004
0.2/0.050
Alpha-BHC
0.01
CRQL
0.02c
NA/0.050
Beta-BHC
0.01
CRQL
0.02c
NA/0.050
Gamma-BHC (lindane)
0.2
2L
0.03
0.2/0.050
Notes:
CRQL = Contract Required Quantitation Limit
MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level
NA = Not Available
a 2L = NC 2L of North Carolina Administrative Code, Title 15 A, Subchapter 2L, Classifications and Water Quality Standards Applicable to the
Groundwater of North Carolina
c As Hexachlorocyclohexane isomers (technical grade).
j.ig/1 = micrograms per liter
Response Action for OlJ-2
1994 ROD
The OlJ-2 ROD was signed on November 22, 1994. The OlJ-2 remedy addressed the soil contamination
on the former FCX property. The OlJ-2 RI and BRA indicate that elevated levels of the site-related
contaminants DDT, DDD, gamma-BHC (lindane), endrin, dieldrin, chlordane and PCP were present in
the soil at the Site. A summary of the RAOs for OlJ-2 included:
• Reducing levels of PCP in the surface soil (top one foot)
• Reduce the amount of total pesticides in surface and subsurface soil as a source of groundwater
contamination.
Remedial components as stated in the 1994 ROD included:
• Demolishing existing buildings and structures and transporting the demolition rubble to an
appropriate disposal facility.
• Excavating approximately 6,945 cubic yards of contaminated soil and stockpiling the soil on site
in preparation for treatment.
• Treating the contaminated soil on-site using thermal desorption and base catalyzed
decomposition.
• Backfilling the excavated areas with the treated soil.
• Re-grading and seeding the Site with grass to minimize the potential for erosion and to enhance
the appearance of the Site.
5
-------
Table 2: OU-2 1994 ROD Soil ARARs
Remedial Goals (mg/kg)
Total Pesticides3
1.0
Pentachlorophenolb
3.2
Notes:
a Defined as gamma-BHC (Lindane), endrin, dieldrin, chlordane, DDT, and DDD.
b Applies only to the top one foot of soil,
mg/kg milligram per kilogram
Response Action for OU-3
1996 ROD
The OU-3 remedy addresses the portion of the soils and groundwater contamination associated with the
former Burlington property. The OU-3 ROD, issued on September 30, 1996, designed a remedy to
address these concerns. A summary of the RAOs for OU-3 included:
• Minimize the potential for infiltration of VOCs from the soil into the groundwater.
• Reach groundwater remediation levels for groundwater COCs.
The remedial components, as stated in the 1996 OU-3 ROD, included:
• Treatment of soil contaminated with volatile organic compounds using the Soil Vapor Extraction
technology in order to reduce and minimize the potential adverse impacts to groundwater on and
around the property currently owned and operated by Burlington Industries.
• Treatment of groundwater COCs, mainly VOCs, using air sparging (AS) technology, to meet
federal MCLs or the NC 2L, whichever are more protective.
• Monitoring of groundwater entering and exiting the treatment system, as well as monitoring of
the groundwater quality on and around the textile facility for evidence that natural attenuation is
happening, for an estimated 30 years, or until the performance standards have been met.
• The use of ICs, including deed restrictions in the affected area to prohibit the consumption of
contaminated groundwater associated with the property currently owned and operated by
Burlington Industries will be determined during the remedial design (RD).
2006 Explanation of Significant Difference (ESD)
The 2006 ESD outlined four remedy changes, as summarized below, which included:
• Accelerated natural attenuation (ANA) in selected areas throughout the Site, as needed, where
MNA is not significantly reducing VOC concentrations. The objective of using ANA to enhance
the OU3 remedy at the Site is to accelerate the natural attenuation of VOCs by injecting electron
donors and, possibly, bacteria (i.e., microbial injection) into the groundwater.
• Updated list of COCs. The EPA removed the inorganics aluminum, arsenic, barium, iron, lead
and manganese and the compound bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate from the list of COCs because they
were deemed to not be site-related.
• The remedial enhancements, as identified in the 2006 ESD, include the use of the most current
SW-846 Methods for VOC analysis.
• Outline the need for a distinction between the original OU-3 remedy and the modified OU-3
remedy (based on the ESD). ANA will be instated along with continued MNA and AS/SVE.
6
-------
Table 3: OU-3 2006 ESD Groundwater ARARs
Contaminant of
Concern
2006 ROD
Amendment
Groundwater
Remediation
Goal (jug/1)
2006 ROD
Amendment
Cleanup Level
Rationale
(WJ/1)
Current NC
2La (As of
April 1,
2013) (jag/1)
Current Federal
MCL/CRQL (jig/1)
Carbon Tetrachloride
0.269
2L
0.3
5/0.50
Chloroform
70
2L
70
8070.50
1,1 -Dichloroethene
7
2L/MCL
350
7/0.50
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
70
2L/MCL
70
70/0.50
1,2-Dichloropropane
0.51
2L
0.6
5/0.50
Methylene Chloride
4.6
2L
5
5/0.50
Perchloroethene
0.7
2L
0.7
5/0.50
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
5
MCL
NA
5/0.50
Trichloroethene
2.8
2L
3
5/0.50
Vinyl Chloride
0.015
2L
0.03
2/0.50
Notes:
CRQL = Contract Required Quantitation Limit
MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level
NA = Not Available
a 2L = NC 2L of North Carolina Administrative Code, Title 15 A, Subchapter 2L, Classifications and Water Quality
Standards Applicable to the Groundwater of North Carolina
0 MCL as total trihalomethanes.
Hg/1 = micrograms per liter
2015 ESD
In August 2015, an ESD for OU-3 was signed to implement angled injection technology to address VOC
contamination in the surface water feature north of the Site (Northern Drainage Feature). Based on
results from a 2013-2014 pilot study including 43 injection point locations, the EPA and NCDEQ
approved adding the use of full-scale angled injection in the Northern Area to the existing AS/SVE
remedy.
The ESD proposed full-scale angled injection involving a total of 116 injection points located along the
creek in the northern drainage area where the pilot study was conducted in October and November 2015.
Nine pounds of BOS-100®, a carbon-based product impregnated with zero-valent iron mixed with water,
was used at 77 injection point locations where the max flux of VOCs was estimated to be the highest,
and five pounds of BOS-100® were used in the 39 injection point locations where the max flux of VOCs
was estimated to be lower. A second full-scale injection was performed in April and May 2017
downstream (northeast) of the previous injections and included an additional 62 injection locations.
In summary, BOS-100® was injected at 221 boring locations between 2013 and 2017 to establish a
permeable reactive barrier (PRB) along the southern bank of the Northern Drainage Feature.
Status of Implementation - OU-1
In September 2006, the EPA amended the OU-1 groundwater remedy, removing active (pump and treat)
remediation and leaving MNA in place. The Amendment additionally removed metals, VOCs, and
semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) as OU-1 COCs. By May 2012, pesticide contaminant
concentrations in groundwater appeared to have stabilized. On June 3, 2012, the EPA approved a
7
-------
revision to the Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) for future groundwater sampling events to be
conducted on an annual basis.
Ten groundwater monitoring wells were originally specified for MNA sampling. Two monitoring wells,
MW-3 and MW-5s, were found destroyed and determined to be unsamplable during the May 2017
sampling event. Two monitoring wells, MW-23S and MW-27S were abandoned in place during July 2018.
As a result, these four wells have been dropped from the Site sampling routine. One monitoring well,
MW-42i was not sampled in 2020 due to equipment failure. Therefore, in October 2020, NCDEQ sampled
five groundwater monitoring wells for the Annual O&M phase of the FCX-Statesville OU-1 MNA remedy.
Sample analysis is conducted in accordance with the SESD Analytical Support Branch Laboratory
Operations and Quality Assurance Manual, February 2008 and analyzed for organochlorine pesticides,
including the following pesticides specified in the ROD: alpha-BHC- beta BHC, gamma-BHC (Lindane),
gamma chlordane, dieldrin, and heptachlor epoxide.
Status of Implementation - OU-3
The remedy set in the ROD for OU-3 includes groundwater plume monitored natural attenuation (MNA)
and active source control by means of air sparging and soil vapor extraction (AS/SVE). The AS/SVE
source area remediation began in 2001 with the Phase I AS/SVE performance test. The performance test
included start-up of the Phase I SVE system. Regular operation of the Phase I SVE system began on
July 11, 2001, and AS system operation began on September 17, 2002. The Phase II expansion of the
AS/SVE system in 2003 included the addition of several SVE, AS, and monitoring wells. The system
was again expanded in 2009 and 2013. In 2013-2014, El Paso Natural Gas (EPNG) conducted an angled
injection pilot study. The pilot study was completed, and subsequent monitoring of the stream bed
piezometers indicated that the BOS-100®, the injected agent, was effective in treating groundwater prior
to entry in the Northern streambed.
On July 27, 2018, the EPA approved temporarily suspending operations on the source area AS/SVE
System due to diminishing rate of PCE mass removal and due to the highest PCE concentrations at the
Site being present further downgradient. Following a year of suspended AS/SVE operations, EPNG
proposed the permanent shut down and dismantlement based on average PCE concentrations for
October 2018 and April 2019 (177 and 195 (.ig/L, respectively) source area groundwater samples,
which were collected while the AS/SVE system was inactive, were both less than the average PCE
concentrations of 280 ug/L in April 2018. Additionally, six of the ten source area monitoring wells
sampled reported decreases after the system was shut down, including decreases of approximately an
order of magnitude or greater in some wells. On July 3 1 st, 2019, the agency approved the dismantlement
of the source area AS/SVE system.
Currently, the highest remaining PCE concentrations in groundwater at the Site are located
downgradient of the northern extent of the source area air sparge well network. Given the effectiveness
of air sparging within the building source area, EPNG asked AECOM to move forward with the
installation of a new AS system. To work with scheduling and budgetary requirements, the installation
of the northern AS system was divided into three phases of work. Phase one was completed in
October 2019 with the installation of a new fully integrated air sparge equipment enclosure. Phase two
operations began in March 2020 with the installation of new AS wells (AW-1 through AW-48).
Air supply well piping was connected to wells AS-1 through AS-33 in August 2020. The new system
became operational as of September 2020. In 2021, phase three will include connecting air supply
piping and activate the remaining AS wells ( AW 34 through AW 48, IW-4t and IW-5t) in the
Lower Drive Area.
8
-------
Surface water will continue to be sampled in accordance with NCDEQ Division of Water Resources'
request for quarterly monitoring and to evaluate the continued effects of the BOS-100® injections
described in previous sections and the expected effects of the newly activated northern AS system.
Institutional Control Review
ICs are defined as non-engineered instruments, such as administrative and legal controls, that help
minimize the potential for human exposure to contamination and/or protect the integrity of the remedy.
OU-1
The OU-1 remedy, as amended in the 2006 AROD, calls for ICs to prohibit the installation and use of
drinking water wells on the former FCX property, including implementation of restrictive covenant(s)
pursuant to North Carolina law and/or deed notice(s), as well as monitoring compliance with the City of
Statesville's ordinance (Municipal Code Section 23-276). The City of Statesville's Municipal Code
(Section 23-276) requires all residents to use city-supplied water. The use of private water wells within
city limits is only permitted upon request and with permission from the Iredell County Health
Department. Groundwater is not currently being used as a potable water source. Governmental controls
based on state regulations, such as 15ANCAC 02C .0101 (NC Well Construction Act) prohibit
installing drinking water wells into contaminated aquifers. These regulations pertain to the permitting
and installation of water supply wells and the role of the local health departments as the permitting
authority. A copy of the NC Well Construction Act is included in Appendix J.
In December 2009, DPLURs were recorded for OU-1. Copies of the DPLURs can be found in
Appendix K and plat map in both Appendix K and Appendix D, Figure D-4.
Table 4: Summary of Implemented
nstitutional Controls OU-1
Media That
Do Not
Support
UU/UE
Based on
Current
Conditions
ICs
Needed
ICs Called
for in the
Decision
Documents
Impacted
Parcel(s)
IC
Objective
Title of IC Instrument
Implemented and Date
(or planned)
Groundwater
Yes
Yes
4734-16-7712
Restrictive
covenants
including but
not limited to
prohibiting the
use of
groundwater as
a potable water
source.
North Carolina
Administrative Code
(15ANCAC 02C .0101)
Declaration of Perpetual
land Use Restrictions
Iredell County Register
of Deeds
Book 2040, Page 161
Signed 12/3/09
Recorded 12/2/09
9
-------
OU-2
On December 2, 2009, Sun Associates, LLC purchased the former FCX property at auction. The owner
purchased the property with the understanding that land use restrictions would be instated after purchase
and a Declaration of Perpetual Land Use Restrictions was issued on the property. Land use restrictions,
including restricting any use of groundwater and restricting the use of the property for mining, extraction
of coal, oil, gas, or any other minerals or non-mineral substances, were added in 2009. However, review
of the 1994 ROD is needed to determine if the decision document should be modified to include ICs.
In December 2009, DPLURs were recorded for OU-1. Copies of the DPLURs can be found in
Appendix K and plat map in both Appendix K and Appendix D, Figure D-4.
Table 5: Summary of Implemented Institutional Controls OU-2
Media That
Do Not
Support
UU/UE
Based on
Current
Conditions
ICs
Needed
ICs Called
for in the
Decision
Documents
Impacted
Parcel(s)
IC
Objective
Title of IC
Instrument
Implemented and
Date (or planned)
Soil
Yes
No
4734-16-7712
Restrictive covenants
including but not
limited to prohibiting
the use of the property
for mining, extraction
of coal, oil, gas or any
other minerals or non-
mineral substances
and no building with a
below grade structure
used for human
habitation shall be
constructed.
Declaration of
Perpetual land Use
Restrictions
Iredell County
Register of Deeds
Book 2040, Page
161
Signed 12/3/09
Recorded 12/2/09
OU-3
In November 2002 and April 2008, Declarations of Perpetual Land Use Restrictions (DPLURs) were
issued for four parcels associated with the former Burlington property, OU3, that granted related parties'
access to the Site for remedial purposes, restricted groundwater and surface water use and restricted the
construction of a building on the property without a properly conducted vapor intrusion assessment or
the installation of a vapor intrusion mitigation system. The land use restrictions were not called for in a
decision document for OU-3.
A restrictive covenant prohibiting the use of groundwater as a potable water source and the use of the
property for mining, extraction of coal, oil, gas or any other minerals or non-mineral substances has
been placed on four parcels associated with the former Burlington property: parcels 4734-27-3387,
4734-17-8234, 4734-18-6147 and 4734-17-3327. Parcel Identification Number (PID): 4734-17-3327
is not owned by EPNG but is associated with the former Burlington plant.
10
-------
In February 2017, DPLURs were recorded for 20 parcels associated with the former Burlington
property, OU3. The parcels include: PID 4734-27-2703, 4734-27-2782, 4734-27-2808, 4734-17-7773,
4734-17-7868 (former PID 4734-17-7867), 4734-17-8234, 4734-17-8631, 4734-17-8773, 4734-17-8849,
4734-17-993 l(former# 4734-17-9930), 4734-18-6147, 4734-18-7068 (former # 4734-18-7069),
4734-18-7276 (former # 4734-18-7274), 4734-18-8058 (former # 4734-18-8059), 4734-18-8264
(former # 4734-18-8263), 4734-18-9048 (former # 4734-18-9049), 4734-18-9244
(former # 4734-18-9243), 4734-27-0701, 4734-27-0802 (former # 4734-27-0841) and 4724-27-3387.
Restrictive covenants include but are not limited to prohibiting the use of groundwater as a potable water
source, prohibiting the use of the property for mining, extraction of coal, oil, gas or any other minerals
or non-mineral substances and prohibit building a below grade structure used for human habitation.
Copies of the DPLURs can be found in Appendix K and plat map in both Appendix K and Appendix D,
Figure D-4.
Table 6: Summary ol
' Implemented Institutional Controls OU3
Media That
Do Not
Support
UU/UE
Based on
Current
Conditions
ICs
Needed
ICs Called
for in the
Decision
Documents
Impacted
Parcel(s)
IC
Objective
Title of IC
Instrument
Implemented and
Date (or planned)
Groundwater
Yes
Yes
4734-27-2703
4734-27-2782
4734-27-2808
4734-17-7773
4734-17-7868
4734-17-8234
4734-17-8631
4734-17-8773
4734-17-8849
4734-17-9931
4734-18-6147
4734-18-7068
4734-18-7276
4734-18-8058
4734-18-8264
4734-18-9048
4734-18-9244
4734-27-0701
4734-27-0802
4724-27-3387
Restrictive
covenants
including but not
limited to
prohibiting the
use of
groundwater as a
potable water
source.
North Carolina
Administrative Code
(15ANCAC 02C
.0101)
Declaration of
Perpetual land
Use Restrictions
Iredell County
Register of Deeds
Book 2472,
pages 1173-1252
Signed 12/19/16
Recorded 2/2/17
11
-------
Media That
Do Not
Support
UU/UE
Based on
Current
ICs Called
Title of IC
ICs
for in the
Impacted
IC
Instrument
Needed
Decision
Parcel(s)
Objective
Implemented and
Documents
Date (or planned)
Conditions
4734-27-2703
Restrictive
4734-27-2782
covenants
4734-27-2808
including but not
4734-17-7773
limited to
4734-17-7868
prohibiting the
Declaration of
4734-17-8234
use of the
Perpetual land
4734-17-8631
property for
Use Restrictions
4734-17-8773
mining, extraction
4734-17-8849
of coal, oil, gas or
Iredell County
Soil
Yes
No
4734-17-9931
4734-18-6147
any other
minerals or non-
Register of Deeds
Book 2472,
4734-18-7068
mineral
pages 1173-1252
4734-18-7276
substances and no
4734-18-8058
building with a
Signed 12/19/16
4734-18-8264
below grade
Recorded 2/2/17
4734-18-9048
structure used for
4734-18-9244
human habitation
4734-27-0701
shall be
4734-27-0802
constructed.
4724-27-3387
Systems Operations/Operation and Maintenance (O&M) - OU-1
Currently, the NCDEQ conducts Site O&M activities at OU-1. NCDEQ performs annual sampling of
ten monitoring wells existing on site. Sampling is conducted as part of the O&M phase of the continued
MNA of organochlorine pesticide (OCP) contamination in groundwater. Prior to a request in June 2013,
by the NCDEQ for a reduction in sampling to annually, the NCDEQ sampled semi-annually.
Table 7: OU1 O&M Costs Over the FYR Period
Year
OU1*
2016
$5,900
2017
$6,500
2018
$5,750
2019
$5,100
2020
$3,100
* approximate cost
12
-------
Systems Operations/Operation and Maintenance (O&M) - OU-3
Based on the most current Annual Remedial Action report for OU-3, submitted in June 2020, AECOM
conducts the following O&M activities:
• Semi-annual groundwater monitoring is performed to provide data to assess the stability of the
PCE plume at the Site, generally consistent with the 2007 ANA Work Plan.
• Northern AS system operations and maintenance.
• Based on historical exceedances of the level set forth by NCAC 15A Subsection 02B.0200
(NC 2B standard) for PCE in the Northern Drainage Feature, quarterly surface water sampling
events have been performed since 2012 at the request NCDEQ Division of Water Resources.
Surface water sampling is performed to assess impacts to the North Drainage discussed in
previous sections. A sample is also collected annually from a surface water feature located south
of the Site (Southern Drainage Feature).
• Surface water will continue to be sampled in accordance with NCDEQ DWR's request for
quarterly monitoring and to further evaluate the effect of the BOS-100® injections and northern
AS system. In 2020, six sampling locations were sampled quarterly. In addition, three (3)
sampling locations and four (4) piezometers are sampled annually.
Table 8: OU-3 O&M Costs Over the FYR Period
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Subtotal
System O&M
$77,200
$81,840
$79,860
$0
$21,990
$260,890
Site Management
$70,300
$108,900
$85,480
$222,910
$58,884
$546,474
City of Statesville Utilities
$300
$200
$200
$1,384
$5,3 15
$7,399
Duke Energy Utilities
$2,000
$2,000
$2,000
$1,338
$0
$7,338
Surveying
$0
$540
$0
$0
$0
$540
Landscaping
$0
$0
$0
$0
$3,742
$3,742
Emergency Building Repairs
$0
$0
$0
$50,000
$0
$50,000
GW Monitoring
$86,900
$71,780
$64,600
$59,650
$52,670
$335,600
SW Monitoring
$24,900
$24,900
$23,930
$21,190
$21,200
$1 16,120
Lab Costs
$1 1,399
$10,260
$19,305
$1 1,939
$ 15,409
$68,312
Seep Assessment & Design
$18,550
$50,290
$0
$62,500
$0
$131,340
O&M Subtotal
$291,549
$350,710
$275,375
$430,91 1
$179,210
$1,527,755
Capital Remediations
$381,718
$212,160
$0
$194,675
$457,440
$1,245,993
Total OU-3 Expenditures
$673,267
$562,870
$275,375
$625,586
$636,650
$2,773,748
13
-------
III. PROGRESS SINCE THE PREVIOUS REVIEW
This section includes the protectiveness determinations and statements from the previous FYR Report as
well as the recommendations from the previous FYR Report and the status of those recommendations.
Table 9: Protectiveness Determinations/Statements from the 2016 FYR Report
ou#
Protectiveness
Determination
Protectiveness Statement
Sitewide
Short-term
Protective
The remedies at the FCX Statesville Site currently protect human
health and the environment. There are no known current exposure
routes to contaminated soil or groundwater. Contaminated soils have
been mitigated through source removal and groundwater is not used
as a potable source of water. Annual groundwater monitoring for
MNA at OU-1 and active remediation of AS/SVE with the new
implementation of angled injection technology at OU-3 are being
successfully employed. Continued groundwater and surface water
monitoring are necessary to ensure the protectiveness of the Site as
stated in the decision documents. However, to ensure long-term
protectiveness, institutional controls need to be fully implemented on
impacted property parcels purchased by El Paso Natural Gas
Company located north of the former Burlington textile property.
Table 10: Status of Recommendations from the 2016 FYR Report
Issue
Recommendations
Current
Status
Current
Implementation
Status Description
Completion Date
(if applicable)
ICs have not been
fully implemented for
the impacted property
parcels purchased by
El Paso Natural Gas
Company located
north of the former
Burlington textile
property.
Institutional
controls in the form
of deed restrictions
need to be fully
implemented on
contaminated
properties
surrounding the
Site.
Completed
In February 2017,
DPLURs were
recorded for 20 parcels
associated with the
former Burlington
property, OU-3.
2/2/2017
IV. FIVE-YEAR REVIEW PROCESS
Community Notification, Community Involvement and Site Interviews
A public notice was made available by a newspaper posting in the Statesville Record and Landmark
newspaper on 1/5/2021 (Appendix G). It stated that the FYR was underway and invited the public to
submit any comments to the EPA. The results of the review and the report will be made available at the
Site's information repository, Iredell County Public Library, 135 East Water Street, Statesville, North
Carolina 28677.
14
-------
During the FYR process, interviews may be conducted to document any perceived problems or
successes with the remedy that has been implemented to date. One interview was conducted during this
FYR and is summarized below. The full interview is included in Appendix G.
Con an Fitzgerald, AECOM, Contractor:
What is your overall impression of the remedial activities at the Site?
Approximately 6,600 kilograms (over 14,000 pounds) of Perchloroethylene (PCE) were removed from
the subject site by the source area system, resulting in improved groundwater quality within the footprint
of the building and vicinity on all sides. Improvement in groundwater quality has been especially
evident downgradient, which will only accelerate with the new sparge system. The BOS 100™ angled
injections have proven very effective for minimizing impacts in the Northern Drainage as well.
The technologies applied are effectively treating a difficult contaminant in a complex hydrogeologic
environment.
Data Review for OlJ-1 and OU-3
OU-1 Groundwater
Five groundwater monitoring wells were sampled by NCDEQ personnel during the October 2020
Annual O&M phase of the FCX Statesville OlJ-1 MNA remedy. Two monitoring wells, MW-3 and
MW-5s were found destroyed and determined to be unsamplable during the May 2017 sampling event.
Two monitoring wells, MW23S and MW27S were abandoned in place during July 2018. As a result,
these four wells have been dropped from the site sampling routine. One monitoring well, MW42i was
not sampled in 2020 due to equipment failure.
Seven organochlorine pesticide compounds, including four of the OU-1 ROD specified compounds
(alpha-BHC, beta-BHC, Lindane, and Dieldrin,) were detected in samples from three of the FCX wells
(MW-1, MW-2, and MW-9). Observed concentrations for alpha-BHC, beta-BHC, Dieldrin, and Lindane
exceeded their respective remedial goals in the sample collected from monitoring well MW1.
For sample MW2, two pesticides not identified as ROD compounds (Endrin, and Endrin ketone) were
detected. ROD compound Dieldrin and non-ROD compounds Endrin and Endrin Ketone were all
detected in the MW9 sample, with the Dieldrin concentration exceeding the NCAC 2L standard but not
the ROD Remediation Level.
Appendix H contains the OU-1 MNA O&M Monitoring Well Sampling Report (December 2020).
This report includes all current and historical groundwater analytical results.
OU-3 Groundwater
The data included in this FYR are groundwater monitoring data collected from 2015 to April 2019.
The locations of the monitoring wells are presented in Appendix D, Figure D-3. Appendix I contains the
OU-3 Annual Remedial Action Report (March 2020). This report includes all current and historical
groundwater and surface water analytical results.
As stated in the 2020 Annual Remedial Action report, the overall effectiveness of the source area
AS/SVE system operations resulted in substantial improvement in groundwater quality. The dimensions
of the plume to the east, west, and south have shrunk. Bedrock monitoring well PCE data demonstrates a
widespread decreasing trend on all sides of the building and decreasing trends have been noted along the
edges of the north area plume. The reduction in the size and intensity of the overall PCE plume is likely
attributable to diffusion and dispersion following upgradient PCE source depletion (i.e. source area
AS/SVE system operations).
15
-------
Groundwater samples were analyzed for VOCs and field-analyzed natural attenuation parameters.
As stated in the Annual Remedial Action Report (2019), in general, groundwater sampling results
continue to exhibit decreasing PCE concentrations across the Site. Key conclusions based on 2019
monitoring results include the following:
• The average source area monitoring well PCE concentration has decreased from a maximum of
12,295 (.ig/L in November 2000 to 1,647 in October 2012 to only 404 (.ig/L in October 2019.
• The dimensions of the plume to the south appear to be shrinking. Bedrock monitoring well PCE
data demonstrates a widespread decreasing trend on all sides of the building and decreasing
trends have been noted along the edges of the north area plume. The reduction in the size and
intensity of the overall PCE plume is likely attributable to diffusion and dispersion following
upgradient PCE source depletion (i.e. source area AS/SVE operations).
• The highest PCE concentrations outside of the source area have historically been detected in
saprolite wells W-19s, MP-16, and MP-17 and transition zone wells W-30t, IW-4t, IW-5t and
IW-6t. These wells are located near the centerline of the dissolved phase plume directly
downgradient (north) of the source area.
In addition to routine monitoring performed during 2018, a select set of nine (9) "Row N-l" wells were
sampled again in October 2019. The wells were installed in 2007 as potential injection wells but were
never utilized for their intended purpose. However, the wells were sampled in December 2007 for VOC
analysis. The following conclusions were noted based on a comparison of 2007 and 2019 monitoring
results:
• Air sparging efforts have effectively reduced source area PCE. As may be expected, the source
reduction also appears to have resulted in a reduction of downgradient PCE concentrations in
Row N-l wells.
• As of 2019, the highest PCE concentrations at the Site are present further downgradient between
the Row N-l wells and the overland seep area near monitoring well W-30t (i.e., monitoring wells
1 W-6t and W-19s). Given that even the highest concentrations within the facility building
footprint are lower than PCE concentrations in monitoring wells IW-6t and W-19s, re-starting of
the existing system would yield minimal benefits.
OU-3 Surface Water
Quarterly surface water sampling events have been performed since 2012 at the request the NCDEQ,
Division of Water Resources. PCE concentrations in the Northern Drainage Feature have exhibited
seasonal fluctuations since the November 2015 Phase 1 BOS-100® injection and May 2017 Phase 2
BOS-100® injection. However, PCE was detected above the NC 2B standard in four (4) of the six (6)
Northern Drainage Feature samples collected (SW-03, SW-F, SW-16, and SW-22) in May 2020 and two
(2) of the six (6) samples collected (SW-16 and SW-22) in August 2020. PCE results for sample location
SW-D2 remained below the NC 2B standard and near the laboratory detection limit, indicating
continued water quality improvement following the PRB installation. The PCE concentration for the
furthest downstream sample location, SW-T4, in both May and August 2020 were also below the NC 2B
standard. According to the October 2020 Surface Water Assessment Report (sampling conducted in
August 2020), PCE concentrations in the Northern Drainage Feature fluctuate seasonally and generally
exhibit maximum concentrations in winter and spring and minimum concentrations in summer and fall.
PCE was detected above the NC 2B standard in surface water within the Northern Drainage Feature
at sampling locations SW-03 (3.8 jo.g/1), SW-F (4.1 j.ig/1), SW-16 (6.5 j.ig/1), and SW-22 (5.4 j.ig/1) in
May 2020 and SW-16 (5.3 p.g/1) and SW-22 (5.2 j.ig/1) in August 2020. PCE concentrations in SW-03
16
-------
and SW-F typically exceed the NC 2B standard during winter and spring months and are most likely
attributable to overland groundwater seepage emanating from a marsh area south of the Northern
Drainage Feature. The overland seepage also contributes to PCE concentrations downstream of SW-F
(i.e. SW-16 and SW-22). However, downgradient PCE concentrations are also likely affected by
continued infiltration of PCE-impacted groundwater directly into the Northern Drainage Feature.
The northern AS system was installed to reduce overall concentrations of PCE in the groundwater plume
including PCE that continues to discharge into the marsh, overland groundwater seep, and Northern
Drainage Feature. As northern AS system operations continue, reduced PCE concentrations in
groundwater and groundwater seepage are anticipated to result in PCE reductions in surface water
beyond the reductions previous achieved via PRB installation.
PCE concentrations have never exceeded the NC 2B standard in the Southern Drainage Feature
(SW-09). In addition, TCE, cDCE or VC concentrations have never been detected above NC 2B
standards in surface water samples collected from the Northern Drainage Feature or Southern Drainage
Feature. PCE concentrations in the Northern Drainage Feature fluctuate seasonally and generally exhibit
maximum concentrations in winter and spring and minimum concentrations in summer and fall.
Vapor Intrusion
Soil vapor and indoor-air sampling to assess the potential for vapor intrusion has been performed on
multiple occasions both north and south of the former Burlington property. Based on the soil vapor data
there is currently no apparent vapor intrusion risk in the remaining areas surrounding the site, including
residential areas north, east, and south as well as commercial properties to the west.
Site Inspection
Due to the Covid-19 pandemic and the inability for all parties to meet at the Site for the site inspection,
the EPA has given its contractors the opportunity to complete the Site Inspection Checklist Form based
on the most recent, previous site visit by the contractor. The purpose of site inspections is to assess the
protectiveness of the remedy. The site inspection checklists are provided in Appendix C.
OU-1
The site inspection took place on 10/19/2020 during the 2020 OlJ-1 sampling event. Participants
included NCDEQ personnel Doug Rum ford and Stuart Parker. It was noted at the Site Inspection that all
fencing is in good condition, the gates are secure, and no vandalism was evident. All the monitoring
wells were located, routinely sampled, in good condition, and secured and locked.
As noted in the Site Inspection Checklist by NCDEQ: [MNA Remedy] Implementation has been effective
and continues to function as intended. At this time, O&M is adequate and protective of the environment
and human health.
OU-3
The site inspection took place in during O&M activities in 2020, the checklist was completed on
01/20/2021 by AECOM personnel.
It was noted at the Site Inspection that all O&M documents, health and safety plans, and groundwater
monitoring records are readily available and up to date. All fencing is in good condition, the gates are
secure, and no vandalism was evident. Signs and security measures were visible. ICs are adequate.
All the monitoring wells were located and in good condition.
17
-------
As noted in the Site Inspection Checklist by AECOM: The source area treatment system (Air Sparge &
Soil Vapor Extraction) was effective enough for treating PCE in the soil and groundwater of the
developed portions of the site that the 11 SEP A approved its termination in 2018 (AECOM requested
permission in July 2018 to turn off the system for a 1 -year period of rebound monitoring. Permanent
shutdown and dismantling of the system was approved by the EPA July 3 1, 2019). The angled injection
of BOS 100® adjacent to the Northern Drainage completed between 2013-2017 has been effective for
reducing PCE concentrations in Surface Water. A new Air Sparge system has been installed in the
Seep Area between the facility and the northern drainage to treat groundwater seeping to surface water.
V. TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT
QUESTION A: Is the remedy functioning as intended by the decision documents9
Yes. The EPA and the State of North Carolina have determined that all the remedial action construction
activities were performed according to specifications and the remedial action. MNA continues to operate
as designed for OU-1 as well as the active remediation at OU-3.
Currently, no human exposure pathways exist to contaminated soil or groundwater. Groundwater is not
currently being used as a potable water source, but as called for in the decision documents, institutional
controls are needed to prevent access to groundwater until remediation goals are met. The use of ICs
regarding the future installation of water supply wells within the area of contaminated groundwater are
recommended. Governmental controls based on state regulations, such as 15ANCAC 02C.0101
(NC Well Construction Act) prohibit installing drinking water wells into contaminated aquifers.
These regulations pertain to the permitting and installation of water supply wells and the role of the local
health departments as the permitting authority.
The OU-1 remedy, as amended in the 2006 A ROD, calls for ICs to prohibit the installation and use of
drinking water wells on the former FCX property. The City of Statesville's Municipal Code
(Section 23-276) requires all residents to use city-supplied water. Governmental controls based on state
regulations, such as 15ANCAC 02C .0101 (NC Well Construction Act) prohibit installing drinking
water wells into contaminated aquifers. These regulations pertain to the permitting and installation of
water supply wells and the role of the local health departments as the permitting authority.
As stated previously regarding ICs for OlJ-2, in 2009 Sun Associates, LLC purchased the former FCX
property at auction and Declaration of Perpetual Land Use Restrictions were issued on the property.
The land use restrictions placed on the property include restricting any use of groundwater as well as
restricting the use of the property for mining, extraction of coal, oil, gas, or any other minerals or non-
mineral substances. However, review of the 1994 ROD is needed to determine if the decision document
should be modified to include ICs.
The OU-3 remedy, as recorded in the 1996 ROD, calls for ICs to prohibit the installation and use of
drinking water wells associated with the property formerly owned and operated by Burlington.
In February 2017, DPLlJRs were recorded for 20 parcels associated with OlJ-3, the former Burlington
property. The parcels include: PID 4734-27-2703, 4734-27-2782, 4734-27-2808, 4734-17-7773,
4734-17-7868 (former PID 4734-17-7867), 4734-17-8234, 4734-17-863 1, 4734-17-8773, 4734-17-8849,
4734-17-993 1 (former # 4734-17-9930), 4734-18-6147, 4734-18-7068 (former # 4734-18-7069),
18
-------
4734-18-7276 (former # 4734-18-7274), 4734-18-8058 (former # 4734-18-8059), 4734-18-8264
(former # 4734-18-8263), 4734-18-9048 (former # 4734-18-9049), 4734-18-9244
(former # 4734-18-9243), 4734-27-0701, 4734-27-0802 (former # 4734-27-0841), and 4724-27-3387.
Restrictive covenants include but are not limited to: prohibiting the use of groundwater as a potable
water source, prohibiting the use of the property for mining, extraction of coal, oil, gas or any other
minerals or non-mineral substances and prohibit building a below grade structure used for human
habitation.
Current O&M activities are up to date. OU-1 O&M activities are completed by the NCDEQ,
who performs annual groundwater sampling at the Site. OU3 O&M activities include, but not limited,
to semi-annual groundwater monitoring, AS/SVE system operation and maintenance and quarterly
surface water sampling (with some wells sampled annually).
QUESTION B: Are the exposure assumptions, toxicity data, cleanup levels and RAOs used at the time
of the remedy selection still valid9
OU-1 Groundwater
Yes. The exposure assumptions, toxicity data, clean-up levels, and RAOs used at the time of the remedy
are still valid for all of the COCs for OIJ1. None of the cleanup goals resulted in a cancer risk greater
than lxlO"4 for carcinogens or a noncancer HQ of greater than 1. The current land use remains
unchanged and groundwater is not being used as a potable water source. Appendix F provides a
groundwater ARAR comparison of remediation goals and current Federal and State Standards.
The North Carolina Classifications and Water Quality Standards Applicable to the Groundwater of
North Carolina, NCAC Title 15A Subchapter 2L (NC 2L), on which several remediation goals are
based, were last amended on April 1, 2013. Section 121 (d)(2)(A) of CERCLA specifies that Superfund
remedial actions must meet any federal standards, requirements, criteria or limitations that are
determined to be ARARs. As shown in Appendix F, the NC 2L Standard is more stringent than the
current remediation goal based on the Contract Required Quantitation Limits (CRQLs) for several
COCs. Currently, these standards are lower than the capacity to reliably quantify them using routinely
available analytical services. CRQLs are the lowest chemical-specific levels for each sample type
(water, soil) that an EPA Contract Laboratory Program contractor must be able to routinely and reliably
measure. Since each environmental sample is different, those amounts are not necessarily able to be
measured in every environmental sample.
Table 11: OU-1 Groundwater ARAR <
Comparison of Remediation Goa
s and Current Standards
( oiiinminnni of
('ona.ii-;
2006 ROD
4» in cm! Hi','iii
(fiOlinciunU:"'
Rcmccibiiioii
< ro;il (iu? !;
2006 ROD
AilXiKulKili
CkniH'p i .c\ el
(ik: !;
i. LUTeni \C
2L:I (As of
April !.
—111 J »M" l>
Current
Federal
MCL/CRQL
(,ug/l)
i, hiiiiuc
ill
ARAR
Yes/No
Chlordane
0.1
2L/CRQL
0.1
2/0.050
No
Dieldrin
0.1
CRQL
0.002
NA/0.10
Yes
Heptachlor epoxide
0.05
CRQL
0.004
0.2/0.050
Yes
Alpha-BHC
0.01
CRQL
0.02c
NA/0.050
Yes'1
Beta-BHC
0.01
CRQL
0.02c
NA/0.050
Yes'1
19
-------
Contaminant of
Concern
2006 ROD
Amendment
Groundwater
Remediation
Goal (|ig/l)
2006 ROD
Amendment
Cleanup Level
Rationale (|ig/l)
Current NC
2La (As of
April 1,
2013) (ng/1)
Current
Federal
MCL/CRQL
(|ig/l)
Change
in
ARAR
Yes/No
(jamma-BHC (lindane)
0.2
2L
0.03
0.2/0.050
Yes
Notes:
ARAR = Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirement
ROD = Record of Decision
CRQL = Contract Required Quantitation Limit
MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level
NA = Not Available
a 2L = NC 2L of North Carolina Administrative Code, Title 15 A, Subchapter 2L, Classifications and Water Quality
Standards Applicable to the Groundwater of North Carolina
b ARAR has changed but ROD remediation goal is more stringent than the current new standard.
0 As Hexachlorocyclohexane isomers (technical grade).
BOLD and underlined indicates current NC 2L standard is more stringent than previous remediation goal.
|ig/l = micrograms per liter
OU-1 Vapor Intrusion
Indoor air concentrations were calculated from groundwater remediation levels for the two volatile
COCs. Table 10 indicates that none of the cleanup goals resulted in a cancer risk greater than lxlO"4 for
carcinogens or a noncancer HQ of greater than 1, and therefore remain protective of human health.
It should be noted that his screening-level evaluation did not consider the potential total risk associated
with multiple groundwater contaminants at a particular shallow well location.
Table 12: OU-1 Results of VISL Evaluation of the Groundwater Remediation Goals
Contaminant of
Groundwater
Predicted Indoor
VISL model-
VISL Model-
Concern
Remedial Goal
Air Concentration
Potential
Potential Hazard
(|ig/l)
(|ig/m3) for
Residential
Carcinogenic Risk
for Residential
Quotient for
Residential
Exposure
Exposure
Exposure
Chlordane
0.1
1.99E-04
7.1E-09
2.7E-04
Heptachlor epoxide
0.05
4.29E-05
4.0E-08
NA
Notes:
VISL = Vapor Intrusion Screening Level
NA = Not Available
|ig/l = micrograms per liter
Hg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter
OU-3 Groundwater
Yes. The exposure assumptions, toxicity data, clean-up levels, and RAOs used at the time of the remedy
are still valid for the COCs for OU-3 except chloroform, cDCE, and 1,1,2-trichloroethane. The analysis
in Appendix F indicates that the groundwater remediation goal for chloroform exceeds a cancer risk of
lxlO"4, and the remediation goals for cis-l,2-dichloroethene and 1,1,2-trichloroethane exceed a
noncancer HQ of 1. None of the remaining cleanup goals resulted in a cancer risk greater than lxlO"4 for
carcinogens or a noncancer HQ of greater than 1, and therefore remain protective of human health.
The current land use remains unchanged, and groundwater is not being used as a potable water source.
Table 11 and Appendix F contains the groundwater ARAR comparison of remediation goals and current
Federal and State Standards.
20
-------
Table 13: OU-3 Groundwater ARAR (
Comparison of
Remediation Goals and Current Standards
Contaminant of
Concern
2006 ROD
Amendment
Groundwater
Remediation
Goal (|ig/l)
2006 ROD
Amendment
Cleanup
Level
Rationale
(|ig/l)
Current NC
2La (As of
April 1,
2013) (ng/1)
Current Federal
MCL/CRQL
(|ig/l)
Change
in
ARAR
Yes/No
Carbon Tetrachloride
0.269
2L
0.3
5/0.50
Yesb
Chloroform
70
2L
70
8070.50
No
1,1 -Dichloroethene
7
2L/MCL
350
7/0.50
Yesb
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
70
2L/MCL
70
70/0.50
No
1,2-Dichloropropane
0.51
2L
0.6
5/0.50
Yesb
Methylene Chloride
4.6
2L
5
5/0.50
Yesb
Perchloroethene
0.7
2L
0.7
5/0.50
No
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
5
MCL
NA
5/0.50
No
Trichloroethene
2.8
2L
3
5/0.50
Yesb
Vinyl Chloride
0.015
2L
0.03
2/0.50
Yesb
Notes:
ESD = Environmental Services Division
ARAR = Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirement
CRQL = Contract Required Quantitation Limit
MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level
NA = Not Available
a 2L = NC 2L of North Carolina Administrative Code, Title 15A, Subchapter 2L, Classifications and Water Quality Standards Applicable to the
Groundwater of North Carolina
b ARAR has changed but ROD remediation goal is more stringent than the current new standard.
c MCL as total trihalomethanes.
Hg/1 = micrograms per liter
OU-3 Vapor Intrusion
Indoor air concentrations were calculated from groundwater remediation levels for the two volatile
chemicals of concern. Table 12 indicates that none of the cleanup goals resulted in a cancer risk greater
than 1 x 10"4 for carcinogens or a noncancer HQ of greater than 1, and therefore remain protective of
human health. This screening-level evaluation did not consider the potential total risk associated with
multiple groundwater contaminants at a particular shallow well location.
Table 14: OU-3 Resuli
ts of VISL Evaluation of the Groundwater Remediation Goals
Contaminant of
Concern
Groundwater
Remedial
Goal (|ig/l)
Predicted Indoor
Air Concentration
(|ig/m3) for
Residential
Exposure
VISL model-
Potential
Carcinogenic Risk
for Residential
Exposure
VISL Model-
Potential Hazard
Quotient for
Residential
Exposure
Carbon Tetrachloride
0.269
3.04E-01
6.5E-07
2.9E-03
Chloroform
70
1.05E+01
8.6E-05
1.0E-01
1,1 -Dichloroethene
7
7.47E+00
NA
3.6E-02
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
70
NA
NA
NA
1,2-Dichloropropane
0.51
5.88E-02
7.8E-08
1.4E-02
21
-------
C 'oniill iii;iHi of
('oiKCi'ii
(ji (Hindu :uer
Rum-dm!
(null
['ivrji'.-lol [nooor
Air ( oiH:c!i!iniion
(M.U HI '! i O!"
Kcsiucnii;;!
LxpOSUIV
YiSi. iliodt;!-
Poienim!
Ciiivinou'.-nii." iVisk
I'.ir Kcsidcillii'.l
Lxposurc
VISL Model-
!*¦=>!ciilii i
f/iioiicni ior
Kcsitl'.-niijil
iixposLirc
ivLetnyiene v nion qc
Perch I oroethyl ene
0.7
5.07E-01
4.7E-08
1.2E-02
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
5
1.68E-01
9.6E-07
8.1E-01
Trichloroethene
2.8
1.13E+00
2.4E-06
5.4E-01
Vinyl Chloride
0.015
1.70E-02
1.0E-07
1.6E-04
Notes:
VISL = Vapor Intnision Screening Level
NA = Not Available
fig/1 = micrograms per liter
}ig/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter
QUESTION C : Has any other information come to light that could call into question the protectiveness
of the remedy9
No additional information has come to light since the previous FYR that calls into question the
protectiveness of the remedy.
22
-------
VI. ISSUES/RECOMMENDATIONS
Issucs/Rcconinicndalions
OlJ(s) without Issues/Recommendations Identified in the FYR:
OU-3
OU(s):
Issue Category: Other
OU-1
Issue: The ARARs have changed for several COCs, but the current remediation
goals remain protective. NC 2L Standards on which several remediation goals are
based were last amended on April 1, 2013. For several COCs, the NC 2L
Standard is more stringent than the CRQL based remediation goal. Currently,
these standards are lower than the capacity to reliably quantify them using
routinely available analytical services. CRQLs are the lowest chemical-specific
levels for each sample type (water, soil) that an EPA Contract Laboratory
Program contractor must be able to routinely and reliably measure. Since each
environmental sample is different, those amounts are not necessarily able to be
measured in every environmental sample.
Recommendation: Evaluate the AR ARS to determine if modifications to the
decision document will be needed.
Affect
Current
Protectiveness
Affect Future
Protectiveness
Implementing
Party
Oversight
Party
Milestone Date
No
Yes
EPA/State
EPA/State
12/15/2022
OU(s):
Issue Category: Institutional Controls
OU-2
Issue: Determine if ICs provisions should be included in the decision document.
Recommendation: If ICs provisions are required, modify the decision document.
Affect
Current
Protectiveness
Affect Future
Protectiveness
Implementing
Party
Oversight
Party
Milestone Date
No
Yes
EPA/State
EPA/State
12/15/2023
23
-------
VII. PROTECTIVENESS STATEMENT
Protectiveness Statement
Operable Unit:
OU-1
Protectiveness Determination:
Short-term Protective
Addendum Due Date:
NA
Protectiveness Statement: The remedies at the FCX Statesville Site currently protect human health
and the environment. There are no known current exposure routes to contaminated soil or
groundwater. Contaminated soils have been mitigated through source removal and groundwater is
not used as a potable source of water. The City of Statesville's Municipal Code (Section 23-276)
requires all residents to use city-supplied water. Governmental controls based on state regulations,
such as 15A NCAC 02C .0101 (NC Well Construction Act) prohibit installing drinking water wells
into contaminated aquifers. Annual groundwater monitoring for MNA at OU-1 is also being
successfully employed. In order for the remedy to be protective in the long term, evaluate the
ARARS to determine if modifications to the decision document will be needed.
Operable Unit:
OU2
Protectiveness Sin (cm en I
Protectiveness Determination:
Short-term Protective
Addendum Due Date:
NA
Protectiveness Statement: The remedies at the FCX Statesville Site currently protect human health
and the environment. There are no known current exposure routes to contaminated soil or
groundwater. Contaminated soils have been mitigated through source removal and groundwater is
not used as a potable source of water. For the remedy to be protective in the long term, determine if
the OU-2 decision document should be modified to include ICs.
Operable Unit:
OU-3
Protectiveness Stsiteinent
Protectiveness Determination:
Protective
Addendum Due Date:
NA
Protectiveness Statement: The remedies at the FCX Statesville Site currently protect human health
and the environment. There are no known current exposure routes to contaminated soil or
groundwater. Contaminated soils have been mitigated through source removal and groundwater is
not used as a potable source of water. The 1996 ROD for OU-3, called for ICs associated with the
property formerly owned and operated by Burlington. In February 2017, DPLlJRs were recorded for
20 parcels associated with OU-3, the former Burlington property. Active remediation (PRB
installation and AS system) at OU-3 is being successfully employed. Groundwater and surface
water monitoring will continue to ensure the protectiveness of the Site as stated in the decision
documents.
Sitewide Protectiveness Stsilenient
Protectiveness Determination:
Short-term Protective
Protectiveness Statement: The remedies at the FCX Statesville Site currently protect human health
and the environment. There are no known current exposure routes to contaminated soil or
groundwater. Contaminated soils have been mitigated through source removal and groundwater is
not used as a potable source of water. Annual groundwater monitoring for MNA at OU-1 and active
remediation of AS/SVE with the new implementation of angled injection technology at OU-3 are
being successfully employed. DPLlJRs were recorded for 20 parcels associated with OU-3, the
24
-------
former Burlington property. Groundwater and surface water monitoring will continue to ensure the
protectiveness of the Site as stated in the decision documents. In order for the remedy to be
protective in the long term, the following actions are needed:
• Evaluate the ARARS to determine if modifications to the decision document will be needed.
• Determine if the OU-2 decision document should be modified to include ICs.
VIII. NEXT REVIEW
The next FYR Report for the FCX Statesville Superfund site is required five years from the completion
date of this review.
25
-------
APPENDIX A
Reference List
US EPA, Region IV. September 1993. Record of Decision, Operable Unit One, FCX- Statesville
Superfund Site, Statesville, North Carolina.
US EPA, Region IV. November 1994. Record of Decision, Operable Unit Two, FCX- Statesville
Superfund Site, Statesville, North Carolina.
US EPA, Region IV. September 1996. Record of Decision, Operable Unit Three, FCX- Statesville
Superfund Site, Statesville, North Carolina.
US EPA, Region IV. September 200 1. Preliminary Close-Out Report, FCX-Statesville Superfund Site,
Statesville, North Carolina.
US EPA, Region IV. August 2006. Explanation of Significant Difference, Operable Unit Three, FCX-
Statesville Superfund Site, Statesville, North Carolina.
US EPA, Region IV. August 2006. Final Amendment to the 1993 Record of Decision for Operable Unit
One, FCX-Statesville Superfund Site, Statesville, North Carolina.
US EPA, Region IV. September 2006. Superfund Five-Year Review Report, FCX- Statesville Superfund
Site, Statesville, Iredell County, North Carolina.
US EPA, Region IV. September 201 1. Superfund Five-Year Review Report, FCX- Statesville Superfund
Site, Statesville, Iredell County, North Carolina.
NC DENR. May 20 14. OlJ-1 Monitored Natural Attenuation Operations & Maintenance Monitoring
Well Sampling Report. FCX-Statesville Superfund Site, Statesville, Iredell County, North Carolina.
NC DENR. February 2015. OlJ-1 Monitored Natural Attenuation Operations & Maintenance
Monitoring Well Sampling Report. FCX-Statesville Superfund Site, Statesville, Iredell County, North
Carolina.
AECOM. June 2015. Annual Remedial Action Progress Report- 2014. FCX-Statesville Superfund Site,
Statesville, Iredell County, North Carolina.
US EPA, Region IV. August 201 5. Explanation of Significant Difference, Operable Unit Three
Remedial Action. FCX-Statesville Superfund Site, Statesville, Iredell County, North Carolina.
US EPA, Region IV. September 20 16. Third Five-Year review Report. FCX-Statesville Superfund Site,
Statesville, Iredell County, North Carolina.
AECOM. May 20 1 7. Annual Remedial Action Progress Report- 2016. FCX-Statesville Superfund Site,
Statesville, Iredell County, North Carolina.
A-1
-------
AECOM. April 201 8. Annual Remedial Action Progress Report- 20 17. FCX-Statesville Superfund Site,
Statesville, Iredell County, North Carolina.
EPNG. January 2020. Required Annual Notification, DPLlJRs. FCX-Statesville Superfund Site,
Statesville, Iredell County, North Carolina.
AECOM. June 2020. Annual Remedial Action Progress Report- 2019. FCX-Statesville Superfund Site,
Statesville, Iredell County, North Carolina.
AECOM. October 2020. August 2020 Surface Water Monitoring Report. FCX-Statesville Superfund
Site, Statesville, Iredell County, North Carolina.
NCDEQ. December 2020. OU-1 Monitored Natural Attenuation Operations & Maintenance Monitoring
Well Sampling Report. FCX-Statesville Superfund Site, Statesville, Iredell County, North Carolina.
A-2
-------
APPENDIX B
Site Chronology
Event
Date
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
(NC DENR, which is currently NC DEQ) discovered contamination.
February 1986
NC DENR (currently NC DEQ) completed Preliminary Assessment
April 1986
NC DENR (currently NC DEQ) completed Site Inspection
June 1987
EPA proposed Site to National Priorities List (NPL)
June 1988
EPA initiated emergency removal
January 1989
EPA listed Site on NPL
February 1990
EPA initiated combined Remedial Investigation/Feasibi 1 ity Study
(Rl/FS) for OIJ1
November 1990
EPA conducted removal assessment
September 1991
EPA issues an Administrative Order on Consent (AOC) with
Burlington Industries and EPNG
June 1993
Potentially Responsible Party (PRP) initiated Rl/FS for OU3
June 1993
EPA combined Rl/FS for OU2
July 1993
EPA combined Rl/FS for OIJ 1
September 1993
EPA issued RODforOlJl
September 1993
EPA completed Ecological Risk Assessment
June 1994
EPA issued ROD for OU2
November 1994
PRP completed Rl/FS for OU3
September 1996
EPA initiated Remedial Action (RA) for OU1
September 1996
EPA initiated RA for OU2
September 1997
EPA completed Site-wide consent decree
March 1998
PRP initiated RA for OU3
June 2000
PC OR completed
September 2001
EPA completed RA for OU2
December 2002
ROD amendment signed for OU 1
September 2006
Explanation of Significant Difference (ESD) issued for OU3
September 2006
First FYR completed
September 2006
EPA issued Site-wide consent decree
July 2009
PRP submitted OU3 surface water assessment study
May 2010
PRP submitted OU3 AS pilot study
November 20 10
PRP submitted vapor intrusion assessment report and source area
characterization workplan
April 20 1 1
Second FYR completed
September 201 1
B-1
-------
Event
Date
PRPs proposed a new treatment technology for OU3
201 1
Injection work pi an for OU3
March 2015
ESD issued for OU3
August 2015
Full-scale injection begins
October 2015
Third FYR completed
September 2016
| DPLURs recorded
October 20 19
B-2
-------
APPENDIX C
SITE INSPECTION CHECKLISTS
AECOM Prepared Checklist (OU3)
NCDEQ Prepared Checklist (OU1)
C-l
-------
SITE INSPECTION CHECKLIST
FIVE-YEAR REVIEW SITE INSPECTION CHEC KLIST
I. SITE INFORMATION
Site Name: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant) OU3
Date of Inspection: January 2021
Location and Region: Statesville NC; E PA Reg IV
EPA ID: NCD095458527
Agency, Office or Company Leading the Five-Year
Review: USEPA Region 4
Weather/Temperature: Not Applicable
Remedy Includes: (Check a 11 that apply)
~ Landfill cover/containment Monitored natural attenuation
M Access controls ~ Ground water containment
M I nstitutional controls ~ Vertica 1 ba rrierwa lis
~ Ground water pump and treatment
~ Su rfa cc \va ter co llec t ion and treatment
13 Other: Air Sparge / Soil Vapor Extraction/1njccted Permeable Reactive Wall
Attachments: ~ 1 n spection team roster a ttachcd
~ Site m a p a ttachcd
II. INTERVIEWS (checkall that apply)
1. O&M Site Manager Conan Fitzgerald
Name
1 ntcrvicwcd ~ at site E3 at office ~ by phone :
Problems, suggestions f~l Report a ttachcd:
En gineerin g Manager
Title
1/20/21
Date
2. O&M Staff
Name
Interviewed ~ at site ~ at office ~ by phone :
Problems/suggestions fl Report attached:
Title
Date
3. Local Regulatory Authorities and Response Agencies (i.e., state and tribal offices, emergency
response olTicc. police department, office ofpublic h ea It h o r e n v iro nmcnt a 1 health. zoning office,
recorder of deeds, or other city and county offices). Fill in all that apply.
Agency NCDEO
Contact Beth Hartzell Environmental 919 707 8335
Name Engineer Date Phone No.
Title
Prob lem s/suggestions ~ Report attached:
Agency
Contact
Name Title
Prob lem s/suggestions ~ Report attached:
Agency
Contact
Name Title
Prob lem s/suggestions ~ Report attached:
Agency
Contact
Name Title
Prob lem s/suggestions ~ Report attached:
Date Phone No.
Da te Phone No.
Da te Phone No.
C-2
-------
4.
Other Interviews (optional) ~ Report attached:
III. ON-SITE DOCUMENTS AND RECORDS VERIFIED (check a 11 that apply)
1.
O&M Documents
18 O&M manual 13 Readily available 13 Up to date ~ N/A
13 As-built drawings 13 Readily available 13 Up to date ~ N/A
13 Maintenance logs E3 Readily available 13 Up to date ~ N/A
Remarks: Construction is ongoing- rcmainingsparge points to be connected in 2021
2.
Site-Specific Health and Safety Phui 13 Readily available
~ Contingency plan/emergency response plan ~ Readily available
Remarks: Contingency Plan notrequired.
13 Up to date
~ Up to date
~ N/A
13 N/A
3.
O&M and OSHA Training Records 13 Readily available
Remarks: OSH A records stored electronically on AECOM servers.
~ Up to date
~ N/A
4.
Permits and Service Agreements
~ Air discharge permit ~ Readily a vaila ble
~ Effluentdischarge ~ Readily a vaila ble
~ Wastedisposal. POTW ~ Readily available
~ Other Derm its: I-! Readily a vaila ble
Remarks:
~ Up to date
~ Up to date
~ Up to date
~ Up to date
M N/A
13 N/A
13 N/A
13 N/A
5.
Gas Generation Records ~ Readily a vaila ble
Remarks:
~ Up to date
M N/A
6.
Settlement Monument Records ~ Readily available
Remarks:
~ Up to date
M N/A
7.
Ground Water Monitoring Records 13 Readily available
Remarks: Full records stored electronically on AECOM servers.
13 Up to date
~ N/A
8.
Leachate Extraction Records ~ Readily available
Remarks:
~ Up to date
M N/A
9.
Discharge Compliance Records
~ Air ~ Readily a vailable ~ Up to date
~ Water (cfriuent) ~ Read ilv a vaila ble ~ Up to date
Remarks:
13 N/A
13 N/A
10.
Daily Access/Security Logs 13 Readily a vaila ble
Remarks: Stored in AS/SVE section of old build iim.
13 Up to date
n n/a
C-3
-------
IV. O&M COSTS
1. O&M Organization
~ State in-ho use
~ PRP in'-house
~ Federal facility in-ho use
~
2. O&M Cost Records
18 Readily available 18 Up to date
~ Fuiidiiigmcclianism/agrccmcnt in place ~ Unavailable
Qrigina 1 O&M cost estimate: NA ~ Breakdown attached
Total annual cost by y car for rev iew period if available
From: 2016
To:2016
$673,267
18 Breakdown attached
Date
Date
Total cost
From: 2017
To:2017
$562,870
18 Breakdown attached
Date
Date
Total cost
From: 2018
To:2018
$275,375
18 Breakdown attached
Date
Date
Total cost
From: 2019
To:2019
$625,586
18 Breakdown attached
Date
Date
Total cost
From: 2020
To:2020
$636,650
18 Breakdown attached
Date
Date
Total cost
3. Unanticipated or Unusually High O&M Costs during Review Period
Describe costs and reasons: I ncludes approximately $ 1.250.000 in ca pit a 1 re m ed ia tio n e x pe ndit u res.
Capital remedial expenditures occurred in each year exceptfor 2018. explain inutile drop in spending that
vear.
V. ACCESS AND INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS M Applicable ~ N/A
A. Fencing
1. Fencing Damaged ~ Location shown on site map El Gates secured ~ N/A
Remarks:
B. Other Access Restrictions
1. Signs and Other Security Measures ~ Location shown on site map ~ N/A
Remarks: Signa ge installed along fencing near Phoenix Street.
C. Institutional Controls (ICs)
~ Contractor for state
18 Contractor for PRP
~ Contractor for Federal facility
C-4
-------
1. Implementation and Enforcement*
Site conditions imply ICs not properly implemented ~ Yes M No ~ N/A
Site conditions imply ICs not being fully enforced ~ Yes E3 No ~ N/A
Type of monitoring (e.g., self-reporting, drive by): Private Security / self reporting
Frequency: 3-5 Visits per week
Responsible party/agency: Wilson Security
Contact Conan Fitzgerald Engineering Mgr 9194611260
Name Title
Date
Phone no.
Reporting is up to date
~ Yes
~ No
El N/A
Reports a re verified by tliclcadagcncy
~ Yes
~ No
M N/A
Specific requirements in deed o r d e c is io n d o cum e n t s ha v e b e e n m et
~ Yes
~ No
M N/A
Violations have been reported
~ Yes
~ No
M N/A
Otherprobleins orsuggestions: ~ Report attached
2. Adequacy EI ICs arc adequate ~ ICs arc inadequate ~ N/A
Remarks:
D. General
1. Vandalism/Trespassing ~ Location shown on site map El No \ andalism evident
Remarks: EPNG has put significant c(Tort into securingpropcrty and m itigating vandalism.
2. Land Use Changes On Site 0N/A
Remarks:
3. Land Use Changes Off Site El N/A
Remarks:
VI. GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS
A. Roads El Applicable ~ N/A
1. Roads Damaged ~ Location shown on site map El Roads adequate ~ N/A
Remarks:
B. Other Site Conditions
Remarks:
VII. LANDFILL COVERS ~ Applicable M N/A
A. Landfill Surface
1. Settlement (low spots) ~ Location shown on site map ~ Settlement not evident
Aria 1 extent: Depth:
Remarks:
2. Cracks ~ Location shown on site map ~ Crackingnotcvidcnt
C-5
-------
Leneths:
Remarks:
Widths:
Denths:
3.
Erosion
Aria 1 extent:
Remarks:
~ Location shown on site map
~ Erosion not evident
Dcoth:
4.
Holes
Aria 1 extent:
Remarks:
~ Location shown on site map
~ Holes not evident
Dentli:
5.
Vegetative Cover
~ No signs of stress
Remarks:
~ Grass ~ Cover properly established
~ Trees/shrubs (indicate size and locations on a diagram)
6.
Alternative Cover (e.g.
Remarks:
, armored rock, concrete)
~ N/A
7.
Bulges
Aria 1 extent:
Remarks:
~ Location shown on site map
~ Bulges not evident
Height:
8.
Wet Areas/Water Damage ~ Wet areas/water damage notcvident
~ Wet a rea s
~ Ponding
~ Seeps
~ Soft subgrade
Remarks:
~ Location shown on site map
~ Location shown on site map
~ Location shown on site map
~ Location shown on site map
Aria 1 extent:
Aria 1 extent:
Aria 1 extent:
Aria 1 extent:
9.
Slope Instability
~ No evidence of slope
Aria 1 extent:
Remarks:
~ Slides
instability
~ Location shown on site map
B. Benches ~ Applicable ~ N/A
(H ori/on tally const rue ted mounds of earth placed a cross a steep land fill side slope to interrupt the slope in
order to slow down the velocity of surface runoff and intercept and convey the runoff to a lined channel.)
1.
Flows Bypass Bench
Remarks:
~ Location shown on site map
~ N/A orokay
2.
Bench Breached
Remarks:
~ Location shown on site map
~ N/A orokay
3.
Bench Overtopped
Remarks:
~ Location shown on site map
~ N/A orokay
C-6
-------
c.
Letdown Channels ~ Applicable ~ N/A
(Channel lined with erosion control mats, riprap, grout bags or gabions that descend down the steep side
slope of the cover and will allow the runoff water collected by the benches to move off ofthc la ndfill
cover without creating erosion gullies.)
1
Settlement (Low spots) ~ Location shown on site map
~ No evidence of settlement
Aria 1 extent:
Depth:
Remarks:
2
Material Degradation ~ Location shown on site map
~ No evidence of degradation
Material tvpe:
Aria 1 extent:
Remarks:
3
Erosion ~ Location shown on site map
~ No evidence of erosion
Aria 1 extent:
Depth:
Remarks:
4
Undercutting ~ Location shown on site map
~ No evidence of undercutting
Aria 1 extent:
Depth:
Remarks:
5
Obstructions Tvoe:
n Location shown on site man Aria 1 extent:
Size:
Remarks:
~ No obstructions
6
Excessive Vegetative Growth Tvoe:
~ No evidence of excessive growth
~ Vegetation in channels docs not obstruct flow
n Location shown on site man Aria 1 extent:
Remarks:
D. Cover Penetrations ~ Applicable ~ N/A
1
Gas Vents ~ Active
~ Passive
~ Properly secured/locked ~ Functioning ~ Routinely sampled ~ Good condition
~ Evidence ofleakage at penetration ~ Needs maintenance ~ N/A
Remarks:
2
Gas Monitoring Probes
~ Properly secured/locked ~ Functioning ~ Routinely sampled ~ Good condition
~ Evidence ofleakage at penetration ~ Needs maintenance ~ N/A
Remarks:
3
Monitoring Wells (within surface area ofla ndfill)
~ Properly secured/locked ~ Functioning ~ Routinely sampled ~ Good condition
~ Evidence ofleakage at penetration ~ Needs maintenance ~ N/A
C-7
-------
Remarks:
4
Extraction Wells Leachate
~ Properly secured/locked ~ Functioning ~ Routinely sampled ~ Good condition
~ Evidence ofleakage at penetration ~ Needs maintenance ~ N/A
Remarks:
5
Settlement Monuments ~ Located ~ Routinely surveyed ~ N/A
Remarks:
E. Gas Collection and Treatment ~ Applicable ~ N/A
1
Gas T reatment Facilities
~ Flaring ~ Thermal destruction ~ Collection forreuse
~ Good condition ~ Needs maintenance
Remarks:
2
Gas Collection Wells, Manifolds and Piping
~ Good condition ~ Needs maintenance
Remarks:
3
Gas Monitoring Facilities (e.g., gas monitoring of adjaccnthomes orbuildings)
~ Good condition ~ Needs maintenance ~ N/A
Remarks:
F.
Cover Drainage Layer ~ Applicable ~ N/A
1
Outlet Pipes Inspected ~ Functioning ~ N/A
Remarks:
2
Outlet Rock Inspected ~ Functioning ~ N/A
Remarks:
G.
Detention/Sedimentation Ponds ~ Applicable ~ N/A
1.
Siltation Area extent: Depth: ~ N/A
K1 Siltation not evident
Remarks:
2.
Erosion Area extent: Depth:
K1 Erosion not evident
Remarks:
3.
Outlet Works ~ Functioning ~ N/A
Remarks:
4.
Dam ~ Functioning ~ N/A
Remarks:
EL Retaining Walls ~ Applicable ~ N/A
1
Deformations ~ Location shown on site map ~ De fo rm a tio n n o t e v id en t
C-8
-------
H o ri/o n ta 1 d isp lac cm cut: Vcrtica 1 displa ccmcnt:
Rotational disolacement:
Remarks:
2
Degradation ~ Location shown on site map ~ Dc gra d a t io n note v id cut
Remarks:
I. Perimeter Ditches/Off-Site Discharge ~ Applicable 0N/A
1.
Siltation ~ Location shown on site map ~ Siltation not evident
Area extent: Depth:
Remarks:
2.
Vegetative Growth ~ Location shown on site map ~ N/A
~ Vcgcta t ion docs not im pede flow
Area extent: Tvpe:
Remarks:
3.
Erosion ~ Location shown on site map ~ Erosion not evident
Area extent: Depth:
Remarks:
4.
Discharge Structure ~ Functioning ~ N/A
Remarks:
VIII. VERTICAL BARRIER WALLS ~ Applicable 0N/A
1.
Settlement ~ Location shown on site map ~ Settlement not evident
Area extent: Depth:
Remarks:
2.
Performance Monitoring Type of monitoring:
~ Perform ancc not m onitorcd
Frcaucncv: ~ Evidence of breadline
Hcaddiffcrcntial:
Remarks:
IX. GROUND WATER/SURFACE WATER REMEDIES M Applicable ~ N/A
A.
Ground Water Extraction Wells, Pumps and Pipelines ~ Applicable 0N/A
1
Pumps, Wellhead Plumbing and Electrical
~ Good condition ~ All required wells properly operating ~ Needs maintenance 0N/A
Remarks:
2
Extraction System Pipelines, Valves, Valve Boxes and Other Appurtenances
~ Good condition ~ Needs maintenance
C-9
-------
Remarks:
3
Spare Parts and Equipment
~ Readilv a vaila ble ~ Good condition ~ Requires upgrade ~ Needs to be provided
Remarks:
B. Surface Water Collection Structures, Pumps and Pipelines ~ Applicable 0N/A
1
Collection Structures, Pumps and Electrical
~ Good condition ~ Needs maintenance
Remarks:
2
Surface Water Collection System Pipelines, Valves, Valve Boxes and Other Appurtenances
~ Good condition ~ Needs maintenance
Remarks:
3
Spare Parts and Equipment
~ Read ilv a vaila ble ~ Good condition ~ Requires upgrade ~ Needs to be provided
Remarks:
C
T reatment System ~ Applicable 0N/A
1
T reatment T rain (check components that apply)
~ Metals removal ~ Oil/water separation ~ Bio remediation*
~ Air stripping ~ Ca rbon adsorbers ~ In-situ chemical oxidation*
~ Filters: ~ Monitored natural a Herniation*
~ Additive (e.». chclationaucnt. flocculcnt):
~ Others:
~ Good condition ~ Needs maintenance
~ Samplingports properly marked and functional
~ Sam pling/maintenancc logdisplaycdand up to date
~ Equipmen t properly identified
~ Oua ntitv of "round wa ter treated a nnuallv:
~ Ouantitv of surface water treated annually:
Remarks:
2
Electrical Enclosures and Panels (properly rated and functional)
~ N/A ~ Good condition ~ Needs maintenance
Remarks:
3
Tanks. Vaults, Storage Vessels
~ N/A ~ Good condition ~ Proper secondary containment ~ Needs maintenance
Remarks:
C-10
-------
4.
Discharge Structure and Appurtenances
DN/A ~ Good condition ~ Needs maintenance
Remarks:
5.
T reatment Building(s)
DN/A ~ Good condition (esp. roofand doorways) ~ Needs repair
~ Clieni icals a nd equipment properly stored
Remarks:
6.
Monitoring Wells (pump a nd treatment rem edy)
~ Properly secured/locked ~ Functioning ~ Routinely sampled ~ Good condition
~ All required wells located ~ Needs maintenance ~ N/A
Remarks:
D. Monitoring Data
1.
Monitoring Data
K1 Is routinely submitted on time Kl Is of acceptable quality
2.
Monitoring Data Suggests:
K1 Ground waterplunie is effectively contained |g] Contaniinant concentrations arc declining
E. Monitored Natural Attenuation*
1.
Monitoring Wells (natural attenuation remedy)
KI Properly secured/locked KI Functioning KI Routinely sampled 15 Good condition
EI All required wells located ~ Needs maintenance ~ N/A
Remarks:
X. OTHER REMEDIES
If there arc remedies applied at the site a nd not covered a bovc. attachan inspection sheet describing the pliy sical
nature a nd condition of a nv facility a ssociatcd with the remedy. An example would be soil va porextraction.
XI. OVERALL OBSERVATIONS
A.
Implementation of the Remedy
Describe issues and observations relating to whether the remedy is effective a n d fun ct ion ing a s d e sign ed.
Begin with a brief statement ofwhat the remedy is designed to accomplish (e.g., to contain contaminant
plume, minimize infiltration and gas emissions).
Tiu: simikv hv;iim.:!H s\ sieni i \irSn;i rgo St-il 1 Ainu'lion J was effective enouehfor treating
PCE in the soil and groundwater of the developed portions of the site that the USE PA approved it's
term in at ion in 2018. The angled injection of BOS 100 adjacent to the Northern Drainage completed
between 2013-201 7has been effective for reducing PCE concentrations in Surface Water. A new Air
Sparge svsteni has been installed in the Seep Area between the facilitv a nd the northern drainage to treat
groundwater seeping to surface water.
B.
Adequacy of O&M
C-ll
-------
Describe issues and observations related to t h e ini p le 111 enta t io n a nd sco pe ofO&M procedures. I n
particular, discuss their relationship to the current a nd long-term protcctivcness of the rem edy.
The Operation and Maintenance of existing systems has been effective for ini p lemen tin u a nd in onitorin u
the remedy
C. Early Indicators of Potential Remedy Problems
Describe issues and observations such as unexpected changes in the cost or scope ofO&M or a high
frequency of unscheduled repairs that suggest that the protcctivcness of the remedy may be compromised
in the future.
There are no such indicators
D. Opportunities for Optimization
Describe possible opportunities foroptim i/ation in monitoringtasks or the operation of the remedy.
The new system has iust recently been placed online. This question could be better answered after some
adequate runtime.
Site Inspection Participants
C-12
-------
::klist
r, r rT"rrcrfHi rrrvr; n _
| pT I\
l:e Nai" . _
•cation a- > i >
;encv, Ot :, «»;x^ " I - »ii" ^ 'I* t • 'ear
ri
tnedy IncluC ¦ t • l- «, . >mi, ,, n-v\
" _ uiuiili uivui uuiilaiiliiiwiifc
/^kAcccss controls
O Institutional controls
[Q Ground water pump and treatment
-face water collection and treatment
ler: ______
> tachment | ~ ( ection team roster attached
_
¦tlier/Temper *rf
' JA/)
xJ
¦-7 «f" 6
Monitored natuiai an&nuation
round water containment
al barrier walls
®Sr
II. INTERVIEWS (check all
Imager
Name
Title
Date
interview ; site [J at office [1 bv nhone :
I Kleins, suggestions Q) Report attaci >'
O&M Staff ZZH /V /
Name • Title
Interviewed Q at site f ^ iffice f I > phone :
Pro!*1 « ingestions Q Report attached:
Date
Regulatory Authorities ami Response Agencies (i.e., state and tribal offices, emergency
response office, police department, office of public health or environmental health, zoning office,
recorder of deeds, or other city and county offices), Fill in all that apply.
Agency
Contact
Name Title
Problems/suggestions Q Report attached:
Date
Phone No.
Agency.
Contact
Name
Title
Problems/suggest! Leport attached:.
Agency
Contact
Maine Title
Problem s/suggestions 0 Report attached:
Agency_
Contact
Date
Phone No.
Date
Phone No.
Name Title
Problems/suggestions ([] Report attached:
Date
Phone No.
Agency.
C-13
-------
4.
Problems/suggestir " ~1—1 "eport attached:.
Oiler Interviews (optional) CD Report attached:
ID. ON-SITE DOCUMENTS AND RECORDS VERIFIED (check all that apply)
O&M Documents
CD O&M manual CD Readily available CD Up to date 0 N/A
~ As-built drawings CD Readily available CD Up to date CD N/A
~ Maintenance logs CD Readily available Q Up to date CD N/A
Remarks:
Site-Specific Health ami Safety Plan CD Readilv available CD Up to date CD N/A
/ '
CD Contingency plan/emergency response plan CD Readily available CD Up to date CD N/A
Remarks:
rj/et
O&M xnd OSHA Training Records Mf f,4 CD Readily available CD Up to date HI N/A
Remarks:
i
Permits and Service Agreements
~ Air discharge permit CD Readily available CD Up to date CD N/A
CD Effluent discharge CD Readily available CD Up to date CD N/A
CD Waste disposal, POTW CD Readily available CD Up to date CD N/A
CD Other permits: CD Readily available CD Up to date CD N/A
Remarks:
Gas Generation Records
Remarks:
CD Readily available CD Up to date CD N/A
pj/4
Settlement Monument Records A CD Readily available CD Up to date CD N/A
Remarks:
Ground Water Monitoring Records D Readily available CD Up to date CD N/A
Remarks:
Leaclate Extraction Records ^ CD Readily available CD Up to date CD N/A
Remarks:
Disclarge Compliance Records /V f
I I Air CD Readily available CD Up to date CD N/A
~ Water (effluent) CD Readily available CD Up to date CD N/A
Remarks:
Daily Access/Security Logs lV ' j CD Readily available CD Up to date CD N/A
C -14
-------
Remarks:
IV. O&M COSTS
O&M Organization
Q State iii-liouse
IP in-house
Q Federal facility in-house
~
ontractor for state
I I Contractor for PRP
ontractor for Federal facility
O&M Cost Records
~ Readily available
p to date
[~1 Funding mechanism/agreement in place
lavailable
Original O&M cost estimate: Q Breakdown attached
Total animal cost by year for review period if available
From:
To;
breakdown attached
Date
Date
Total cost
From:
To:
reakdown attached
Date
Date
Total cost
From:
To:
reakdown attached
Date
Date
Total cost
From:
To:
reakdown attached
Date
Date
Total cost
From:
To:
reakdown attached
Date
Date
Total cost
Unanticipated or Unusually High O&M Costs during Review Period
Describe costs and reasons:
V. ACCESS AND INSTITUTION \I C 1NTROLS
^Applic
Fencing
Fencing Damaged
1 i T nation shown on site map fT
j Gates secured Q N/A
Remarks:
SiEC "v
Other Access Restrictions
1. Signs and Other Security Measures
Remarks;
^Location shown on site map ~ N/A
M
Institutional Controls (ICs)
C-15
-------
I. Implementation and Enforcement*
Site conditions imply ICs not properly implemented CD Yes CD No S.N/A
Site conditions imply ICs not being felly enforced CD Yes CD No C^N/A
Type of monitoring (e.g., self-reporting, drive by):
Frequency:
Responsible party/agency:
Contact ____ ___
Name Title Date Phone no.
Reporting is up to date CD Yes CD No pj[|N/A
Reports are verified by the lead agency CD Yes CD No PN/A
Specific requirements in deed or decision documents have been met CD Yes [~1 No [Jn/a
Violations have been reported CD Yes CD No N/A
Other problems or suggestions: Q Report attached
Adequacy CD ICs are adequate CD ICs are inadequate K>va
Remarks:
D. General
I. Vandalism/Trespassing CD Location shown on site map jjj^f No vandalism evident
Remarks:
2. Land Use Changes On Site "j^N/A
Remarks:
3. Land Use Changes Off Site TSfa/A
Remarks:
¥1. GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS
A. Roads CD Applicable ^N/A
1. Roads Damaged CD Location shown on site map Q Roads adequate GsN'A
y
Remarks:
B. Other Site Conditions
Remarks:
A, Landfill Surface
VII. LANDFILL COVERS ~ Applicable pjN/A
1. Settlemen t (low Fpots) CD Location shown on site map f~1 Settlement not evident
C16
-------
Leiiellisi
Widths:
Depths:
Remarks;
Erosion
1 1 Location shown on site map
fl Erosion not evident
Arial extent:
Depth:
Remarks:
Holes
on shown on site map
[ ""les not evident
Arial extent:
Depth:
Remarks:
tative Cover
fl Grass
[ ~ ^ver properly established.
~ No signs of stress
rees/shrubs (indicate size and locations on a diagram)
Remarks:
6.
Alternative Cover (e.g., armored n,^,
Un/a
7k
Remarks:
7.
Bulges
Arial extent:
Remarks:
[j| Location shown on site map
ges not evident
Height:
8.
Wet Areas/Water Damage
Q Wet areas/water damage not
evident
[Z1 Wet areas
nation shown on site map
Arial extent:
ndiiig
nation shown on site map
Arial extent:
eps
Fl Location shown on site map
Arial extent:
ft subgrade
O Location shown on site map
Arial extent:
Remarks:
9.
Slope Instability
1 ^
[ ation shown on site map
i evidence of slope instability
Arial extent:
Remarks:
B. Benches j f licable M/A
(Horizontally constructed mounds of earth placed across a sleep landfill side slope to interrupt the slope in
order to slow down tie velocity of surface runoff arid intercept and convey the runoff to a lined channel.)
1.
Flows Bypass Bench
Remarks:
Q Location shown on site map
PI N/A or okay
2.
Bench Breached
Remarks:
•cation shown on site map
O N/A or okay
Bench Overtopped
•cation shown on site map
O N/A or okay
Remarks:
C-17
-------
c.
Letdown Channels Q Applicable fMN/A
(Channel lined with erosion control mats, riprap, grout bags or gabions that descend down the steep side
slope of the cover and will allow the runoff water collected by the benches to move off of the landfill
cover without creating erosion gullies.)
1.
Settlement (Low spots) Q Location shown on site map
[H No evidence of settlement
Arial extent:
Depth:
Remarks:
Material Degradation Q Location shown on site map
[J No evidence of degradation
Material tvoe:
Arial extent:
Remarks:
3.
Erosion ~ Location shown on site map
[~i No evidence of erosion
Arial extent:
Deoth:
Remarks:
4.
Undercutting Q Location shown on site map
~ No evidence of undercutting
Arial extent:
Deoth:
Remarks:
5.
Obstructions Tvoe:
n Location shown on site man Arial extent:
Size:
Remarks:
[~1 No obstructions
6.
Excessive Vegetative Growth Tvoe:
PI No evidence of excessive growth
PI Vegetation in channels does not obstruct flow
[~] Location shown on site map Arial extent:
Remarks:
D,
Cover Penetrations Q Applicable [Mn/A
1.
Gas Vents [j Active
[~1 Passive
1 1 Properly secured/locked D Functioning [j Routinely sampled [j Good condition
[U Evidence of leakage at penetration 1 1 Needs maintenance [~1 N/A
Remarks:
2.
Gas Monitoring Probes
1 1 Properly secured/locked [H Functioning [D Routinely sampled |~j Good condition
f~l Evidence of leakage at penetration f~1 Needs maintenance l~~1 N/A
Remarks:
3.
Monitoring Weis (within surface area of landfill)
1 1 Properly secured/locked [U Functioning [D Routinely sampled [j Good condition
[j Evidence of leakage at penetration [] Needs maintenance Q N/A
C-18
-------
Rem 1 -
Extraction Wells Leachate
Q Properly secured/locked CD Functioning I outinely sampled O Good condition
PI Evidence of leakage at penetration fl > eeds maintenance f~l N/A
Rem
Settlement Monuments H* ( ¦ "ated 1 ~ T'outinely surveyed ~ N/A
Remarks;
U Gas Collection ami Treatment ~ Applicable r! v «
i. Gas Treatment Facilities
~ Flaring Q Thermal destruction Q Collection for reuse
|[~1 Good condition Q Needs maintenance
Remarks:
Gas Collection Wells, Manifolds and Piping
Q Good condition Q Needs maintenance
Remarks:
Gas Monitoring Facilities (e.g., gas t>< .,' c < ing of adjacent homes or buildings)
~ Good condition f~1 Needs maintenance |_ I'A
Remarks:
F. Cover Drainage Layer fl Applicable j^Sjd/A
1. Outlet Pipes Inspected Q Functioning Q •
Remarks:
Outlet Mock Inspected Q Functioning | ' ¦1A
Remarks:
Detention/Sedimentation Ponds [J Applicable N/A
Siltation Area extent: Depth: Q N/A
0 Siltation not evident
Remarks:
Erosion
Area extent: , Depth:
[3 Erosion not evident
Remarks:
Outlet Works
1 1 Functioning
~ n/a
Remarks:
4. Bam
fl Functioning
~ n/a
Remarks:
Retaining Walls
splicable MA
Deformations
te map
brroation not evident
C49
-------
Horizontal displacement: Vertical disnlacement:
Rotational disolacement:
Remarks:
2.
Degradation QJ Location shown on site map
Remarks:
f~l Degradation not evident
I. Perimeter Ditches/OfT-Site Discharge Q Applicable
(^N/A
1.
Siltation O Location shown on site map
Area extent:
Remarks:
[~1 Siltation not evident
Deoth:
2.
Vegetative Growth Q Location shown on site map
~ Vegetation does not impede flow
Area extent:
Remarks:
~ N/A
Type:
3.
Erosion Q Location shown on site map
Area extent:
Remarks:
f~l Erosion not evident
Depth:
4.
Discharge Structure Q Functioning
Remarks:
~ N/A
VIII.
VERTICAL BARRIER WALLS ~ Applicable
t^N/A
I.
Settlement O Location shown on site map
Area extent:
Remarks:
Q Settlement not evident
Deoth:
2.
Performance Monitoring Type of monitoring:
~ Performance not monitored
Freouencv:
Head differential:
Remarks:
f~! Evidence of breaching
IX. GROUND WATER/SURFACE WATER REMEDIES ~ Applicable Hf N/A
A. Ground Water Extraction Wells, Pumps and Pipelines ~ Applicable §£n/A
, i' ',/ ; Ml' ¦ ¦ „ -•.'¦—r--
1. Pumps, Wellhead Plumbing and Electrical
0 Good condition Q All required wells properly operating O Needs maintenance O N/A
Remarks:
2. Extraction System Pipelines, Valves, Valve Boxes and Other Appurtenances
~ Good condition [U Needs maintenance
C-20
-------
Remarks:
Sparc Parts and Equipment
eadily available Q Good condition
narks:
~ I *quircs upgrade Q Needs to be provided
d Pipelines [~~ > ' pplicab .
ood condition
Remarks:
Piemif «.i> L1 irical
[~1 Needs maintenance
Surface Water Collection System Pipelines, Valves, Valve Boxes and Other Appurtenances
i i • >ood condition f~1 Needs maintenance
Remarks:
Spare Parts and Equipment
sadily available O Good condition
Remarks:
ilicaM' "" (n/A
! j •'•quires upgrade Q Needs to be provi
Treatment Syst
; components that apply)
f~1 Oil/water separation
~ Carbon adsorbers
Treatment'
PI Metals removal
if stripping
Jters: ___
dditive (e.g., chelation agent, flocculent):
n Others:
[~1 Good condition ~ Needs maintenance
nnpliiig ports properly marked and functional
impling/maintenance log displayed and up to date
•juipment properly identified
n Quantity of ground water treated annually:. _
uantity of surface water treated annually: __
larks:
ioremediation*
,-situ chemical oxidation*
onitored natural attenuation*
*u..ctrical Enclosures and Panels (properly rated and functional)
p^N/A ~ Good condition HI Needs maintenance
Remarks:
Tanks, Vaults, Storage Vessels
r/A ~ Good condition
! ~ i -oper secondary containment feeds maintenance
Remarks:
Discharge Structure and Appurtenances
id condition
seds maintenance
C-21
-------
Remarks:
Treatment BuIMing(s)
[j Good condition (esp. roof and doorways)
~ Chemicals and equipment properly stored
Remarks:
D Needs repair
Monitoring Wells (pump and treatment remedy)
0 Properly secured/locked O Functioning Q Routinely sampled
~ All required wells located Q Needs maintenance
Remarks:
Q Good condition
jX^/A
D. Monitoring Data
Monitoring Data
t^Cjs routinely submitted on time
QjC Is of acceptable quality
Monitoring Data Suggests:
ffiforound water plume is effectively contained
E. Monitored Natural Attenuation*
1. Monitoring Wells (natural attenuation remedy)
rS? Functioning p^outinely sampled ffifGood condition
OTHER REMEDIES
If there are remedies applied at the site and not covered above, attach an inspection sheet describing the physical
nature and condition of any facility associated with the remedy. An example would be soil vapor extraction.
XI. OVERALL OBSERVATIONS
Implementation of the Remedy
R.
Describe issues and observations relating to whether the remedy is effective and functioning as designed.
Begin with a brief statement of what the remedy is designed to accomplish (e.g., to contain contaminant
plume, minimize infiltration and gas emissions), iMa/«4 » Prf'
i. iMs r2 ^A/cr'iA./ /fs TZkt'TTEMbfz
Adequacy of O&M
Describe issues and observations related to the implementation and scope of O&M procedures. In
particular, discuss their relationship to the current and long-term protectiveness of the remedy. f\ T t M-1 f»
T"** ,% ?r-eT>fc.T-><'fz CP tVic
1/
Early Indicators of Potential Remedy Problems
WTfigr
Describe issues and observations such as unexpected changes in the cost or scope of O&M or a high
frequency of unscheduled repairs that suggest that the protectiveness of the remedy may be compromised
in the future. ^^
Opportunities for Optimization
Describe possible opportunities tor optimization in monitoring tasks or the operation of the remedy.
Site Inspection Participants
C-22
-------
Map Extent:
Iredell County
Legend
Monitoring Well
Approximate Site Boundary
Site Map with Monitoring Well Locations
Site Name: FCX-Statesville Superfund Site
Site Number:
NCD 095 458 527
Scale:
1:2,000
Date: 2005 Aerial Image, March 17, 2010 map
Figure
Prepared by:
MW-421
C-23
-------
APPENDIX D
FIGURES
-------
>rthmont v
ST1 Ch
•J^Substa
ly Trinity/
Qft*
ifmory.
BURLINGTON
INDUSTRIES
PROPERTY J <0<.
"THE SITE" I- \ '
t I !,' g£E2l
FARMERS
T COOPERATIVE
EXCHANGE
''^f sc'h PROPERTY
r J
2000
4000
SCALE, FEET
SOURCE:
USGS 7.5—MINUTE TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OF THE
STATESVILLE WEST. NORTH CAROLINA QUADRANGLE
DATED 2002.
Proj ect M an agem ent Initials: Designer:MPS Checked: CK Approved: CF
FCX SUPERFUND SITE
EL PASO NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LOCATION MAP AECOM
STATESVILLE. NORTH CAROLINA bl 1 L LUOA 1IUN MAH J-l—
Project No.: 60611584 Date: 2020-01-17 FIGURE D-l
-------
FERNDALE
PHOENIX ST,
PHOENIX ST,
FORMER BURLINGTON
industries
TEXTILE PLANTl
OU3
(CONCEPTUAL)
PCX
BUILDING
WOODLAWN DR,
Filename: \\172.24.168.25\MORRISVILLE\DCS\PROJECTS\ENV\60562430_KMS_OU3FCX\500-DELIVERABLES\503-ANN UAL REPORT\2019 ANNUAL RA PROGRESS REPORT\FIGURES\FIGURE 1-2- OPERABLE
UN ITS. DWG
Project Management Initials: Designer: MPS Checked: CK Approved: CF
NOTE
OU—3 is defined as the extent of the chlorinated solvent
plume which by definition is variable, and extends beyond the
property boundary.
FCX SUPERFUND SITE
EL PASO NATURAL GAS CORPORATION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
Project No.: 60611584 Date: 2020-01-17
FCX SUPERFUND SITE
OPERABLE UNITS
200 300
SCALE, FEET
400
A=COM
FIGURE D-2
-------
Filename: \\172.24.168.25\MORRISVILLE\DCS\PROJECTS\ENV\60562430_KMS_OU3FCX\500-DELIVERABLES\503-ANNUAL REPORT\2019 ANNUAL RAPROGRESSREPORT\FIGURES\FIGURE2-2-WELL
LOCATION 1QF2.DWG
Project Management Initials: Designer: MPS Checked: CK Approved: CF
FCX SUPERFUND SITE
EL PASO NATURAL GAS CORPORATION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
Project No.: 60611584 Date: 2020-01-17
MONITORING AND REMEDIATION
WELL LOCATIONS
(PART 1 of 2)
250 375 500
A=COM
FIGURE D-3A
SCALE, FEET
-------
Filename: \\172.24.168.25\MORRISVILLE\DCS\PROJECTS\ENV\60562430_KMS_OU3FCX\500-DELIVERABLES\503-ANNUAL REPORT\2019 ANNUAL RA PROGRESS REPORT\FIGURES\FIGURE2-3- MW
LOCATION 2QF2.DWG
Project Management Initials: Designer: MPS Checked: CK Approved: CF
NORTHERN DRAINAGE INSET MAP
LEGEND
INTERMEDIATE BEDROCK MONITORING WELL
©© INTERMEDIATE/DEEP BEDROCK MONITORING WELL
0© SAPROLITE MONITORING WELL
®0 TRANSITION MONITORING WELL
H CONCENTRIC DESIGN SAPROLITE WELL
USED FOR SVE AND/OR AIR SPARGING
m DEDICATED AIR SPARGE WELL
® (SAPROLITE/TRANSITION)
ffl DEDICATED SVE WELL (SAPROLITE)
CONCENTRIC DESIGN SAPROLITE WELL
USED FOR MONITORING
INACTIVE LIQUID INJECTION WELL
0© ABANDONED MONITORING WELL
SOURCE AREA INSET MAP
Notes:
1. Inset map locations are shown on Figure 2-2.
2. SVE = Soil Vapor Extraction
FCX SUPERFUND SITE
EL PASO NATURAL GAS CORPORATION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
Project No.: 60611584 Date: 2020-01-17
MONITORING AND REMEDIATION
WELL LOCATIONS
(PART 2 of 2)
60
90
120
AECOM
FIGURE D-3B
SCALE, FEET
-------
-------
V
^5
x
01
o
o
, i.*u .•
THIS PLAT IS NOT A CERTIFIED ~
SURVEY, ISSUANCE IS FOR o
ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY.
* i> * mr Jimommw
..Cqyjfr PL Stefan, (%&
n/i d. pRsa msnmncw
p«aca o
W <838 ® PO t«7i
ALEXANDER RAILROAD
v NWQlf 5RJ7KCTK SNIIW
o«CEl, 10 Ia73<1»*«S3
DO 3-53 ® PC.U'
B/lAllM,
P#HGEl » #4734S70ffil|
08 I• OQ *718
FCX DISTRIBUTION CENTER #230
PARCEL ID |473^167712
5. •'« *C*£5 &«.•*¦
l-\S
h i«s*?!rs
tses?
L-h*
B ie*iB*WT
<7 «»'
L-*S
S I7,-**«T
m ir
L-*«
s trss'ysT
7-3 oa-
L—'?
S 8T5f*S»-C
ac.TB-
L- ' i
s tra^'S-'R
7j.rr
5 13*35'vc
a*.j5-
l-20
S SS'iT'OTE
5S.B«-
til
W«C o*x »C
OTUWSC
eeMsw
ossr^rx
T -t
s oi*«e-'crc
2Dt m-
T-f
s oi*«rsof.
Mar
MOTCS
• ML 0 ST*«CCS ARC MO^TDWM. G*0UMD VEAS0<*CD « t€T UHJ3S. OPOftflSg SPTCirirD
7 NO USGS OH NCCS yowao^ rOUWD 2000' 0' S'T.
3 tl#5 »W Sr%5 flEWOftHZD THL ©LMt'Tr 0W A COtiftiJCT mt SCAflCH.
nH9 SC3T new ri»D, TIMUMvlt « C
W6»tQ!P-s *, CJK&MSsMre ** Wt ^MCCf
«Nsam iMEiisc tynuoc? *«o ,«unst eaw^NSiwos f*cxi.
SteH'UWS »*8rowro 0« 2# »WWST 2006 5Hd»!,B T*t t3u.£&&C
rewrs* a» rr\£ '» of 'K coet.
sy®CH8jrrF* |i. swr we? «i m. » vc^s&bm^ ft*
un* o* •¦•jun ptijKw caxwi-bhc [¦•?» *»o wxft»» to-as s*#*&<
»Mfo«jyro •»< 300' »-^o t«e roao»w; «ocs <« rrcr*i m -.nrrw «
s^Mruaen sci «cmM >m 't,i »h ci nit «*5*nt caiou"*
**e cms®4 rrnwcK0»!« o.i). ¦» ««s *«i w^rrre
kicso« s#e%c rns m ** mmn zmmt*
mmwt & mm smer *t seo^ , , *3 vvm.
m r*€ 08«im», *>€ rQa&*#G urn **v ?© i*e P«CO:
< aucrttc»s aactM-ws M <4#ntn w? m. vrnvt® ^ >c »©frm
o&tx&A csfif-o- o? i*sit Mwsssfwwr, t^PfengwB &nrm, <•'« seu
5l«WC< Ciwrix. HHJ3P* *>C JTOMW
NOTICE OF CONTAMINATED S!?E|
SW ^SSOC/^r^S, LL
1620 V»tST "tOMT STREET, ST*TESVLLE, K.C
re* o^fwffjro** ccMtfo
Pi>f>CC. -d #OUm?Tl?
Dc«d 2CJt © «c»t» 233»-??!.7
BCJEXE^CE.'. «10H.L 0»>.wT^ .» rc*. imC
W5t^Ct omiqom - mi; »<»wHr*, or cvd ess
SCfCRC^Ct- DIED SK50K 0<5? ® ®*ST 04S*
F^Fl^-iCt ®€>» J « "*«E iJ1 m^5CK *
S *7* aCPCS ~/- bfr s«sr#!nel« iwnrt7
*«V» Slf*S1
wrt
*~2l~20C*
Slonc Land Surveying Company „ m
AS**?* 1MM S&8W*. ftj l-*U» ®
»C a*08'
THIS MAP IS NOT A CERTIFIED SURVEY AND HAS NOT
BEEN REVIEWED BY A LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY
FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ANY APPLICABLE LAND
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
FIGURE D-4B
o
o
CD
-------
APPENDIX E
Current Site Status
KiiYironmcnlal Indicators
- Current human exposures under control and protective remedy or remedies in place.
- The exposure pathway to contaminated groundwater has been mitigated andlCs are fully
implemented.
Arc Necessary Inslifnlion:il Controls in Place?
E3 All ~ Some 01 None
The use of K \ including governmental controls, regarding the future installation of water
supply wells within the area of contaminated groundwater should be considered.
Governmental controls based on state regulations, such as ISA NCAC 02C. 0301 and 0304,
may be one option. These regulations pertain to the permitting and installation of water
supply wells and the role of the local health departments as the permitting authority. In
February 2017, DPI A His were recordedfor 20 parcels associated with the former Burlington
property, OU3. A restrictive covenant prohibiting the use of groundwater as a potable water
source and the use of the property for mining, extraction of coal, oil, gas or any other
minerals or non-mineral substances has been recorded.
Mas KPA Designated the Site as Sitcwidc Ready lor Anticipated I se?
j ^ Yes" ~ No
M Yes ~ No
E-l
-------
Appendix F
ARAR Review
Section 12 1 (d)(2)(A) of CERCLA specifies that Superfund remedial actions must meet any
federal standards, requirements, criteria, or limitations that are determined to be legally ARARs.
Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements are those standards, criteria, or
limitations promulgated under federal or state law that specifically address a hazardous
substance, pollutant, contaminant, action, location, or other circumstance at a CERCLA site. To-
Be-Considered criteria (TBCs) are non-promulgated advisories and guidance that are not legally
binding but should be considered in determining the necessary level of cleanup for protection of
human health or the environment. While TBCs do not have the status of ARARs, EPA's
approach to determining if a remedial action is protective of human health and the environment
involves consideration of TBCs along with ARARs. Chemical-specific ARARs are specific
numerical quantity restrictions on individually listed contaminants in specific media. Examples
of chemical-specific ARARs include the MCLs specified under the Safe Drinking Water Act
(SDWA) as well as the ambient water quality criteria that are enumerated under the Clean Water
Act. Because there are usually numerous contaminants of potential concern for any site, various
numerical quantity requirements can be ARARs.
In performing the Five-Year Review for compliance with ARARs, only those ARARs that address the
protectiveness of the remedy are reviewed. Because the remedy at the Site currently
addresses only groundwater contamination, this Five-Year Review will discuss compliance with
chemical-specific groundwater ARARs only.
Current Potentially-Applicable ARARs
It is the EPA" s policy that ARARs are generally "frozen" at the time of the ROD signature unless a
"new or modified requirement calls into question the protectiveness of the selected remedy", 55 Fed.
Reg. 8757 (March 8, 1990). The NC Classifications and Water Quality Standards Applicable to the
Groundwater of North Carolina, NCAC Title 15 A Subchapter 2L, (NC 2L) on which several of the
remedial goals are based were last amended on April 2013. Title 15 A of the North Carolina
Administrative Code, Subchapter 2 L (NC AC 2L) is a Chemical-Specific State ARAR for this Site.
OU1
Groundwater
The exposure assumptions, toxicity data, clean-up levels, and RAOs used at the time of the remedy are
still valid for all of the COCs for OU1. None of the cleanup goals resulted in a cancer risk greater than
1 x 10"4 for carcinogens or a noncancer HQ of greater than 1. The current land use remains unchanged
and groundwater is not being used as a potable water source.
F-l
-------
QUI Groundwater ARAR Comparison of Remediation Goals and Current Standards
Contaminant of
2006 ROD
2006 ROD
Current NC
Current
Change
Concern
Amendment
Amendment
2La (As of
Federal
in
Groundwater
Cleanup Level
April 1,
MCL/CRQL
ARAR
Remediation
Goal (|ig/l)
Rationale (|ig/l)
2013) ((J.g/1)
(|ig/l)
Yes/No
Chlordane
0.1
2L/CRQL
0.1
2/0.050
No
Dieldrin
0.1
CRQL
0.002
N A/0.10
Yes
Heptachlor epoxide
0.05
CRQL
0.004
0.2/0.050
Yes
Alpha-BHC
0.01
CRQL
0.02°
NA/0.050
Yesb
Beta-BHC
0.01
CRQL
0.02c
NA/0.050
Yesb
Gamma-BHC (lindane)
0.2
2L
0.03
0.2/0.050
Yes
Notes:
ARAR = Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirement
ROD = Record of Decision
CRQL = Contract Required Quantitation Limit
MCL = Ma ximum Contaminant Level
NA = Not Available
a 2L = NC 2L of North Carolina Administrative Code, Title 15 A, Subchapter 2L, Classifications and Water Quality
Standards Applicable to the Groundwater of North Carolina
b ARAR ha s changed but RODremediationgoalis more stringent than the currentnew standard.
0 As Hexachlorocyclohexane isomers (technicalgrade).
BOLD and underlinedindicates currentNC 2L standard is more strineentthanDrevious remediation eoal.
(j.g/1 = micro grams per liter
OU1 Review of Risk-Based Groundwater Remediation Goals or Remediation Goals with a Change
in ARAR
Contaminant of
Concern
Groundwater
Remedial Goal
Oigfl)
Tap water
RSLa lO"6
Risk
(|ig/l)
Tap water
RSLa HQ =
1
Oigfl)
Riskb
HQC
Chlordane
0.1
2.0E-02
7.4E-01
5.0E-06
1.4E-01
Dieldrin
0.1
1.8E-03
3.8E-01
5.6E-05
2.6E-01
Heptachlor epoxide
0.05
1.4E-03
1.2E-01
3.6E-05
4.2E-01
Alpha-BHC
0.01
7.2E-03
9.7E+01
1.4E-06
1.0E-04
Beta-BHC
0.01
2.5E-02
NA
4.0E-07
NA
Gamma-BHC
(lindane)
0.2
4.2E-02
3.6E+00
4.8E-06
5.6E-02
Notes:
NA = Not Available
a) Current EPARegional ScreeningLevels (RSLs), datedNovember2020, are available at
https://www.epa.gov/risk/regional-screening-levels-rsls-generic-tables
b) Cancerrisk = (remedialgoal/cancer-based RSL)x 10"6
c) HQ= HazardQuotient=(remedialgoal/noncancerRSL).
(j.g/1 = micro grams per liter
F-2
-------
Vapor Intrusion
Indoor air concentrations were calculated from groundwater remediation levels for the two volatile
COCs. Table 10 indicates that none of the cleanup goals resulted in a cancer risk greater than lxlCHfor
carcinogens or a noncancerHQ of greater than 1, and therefore remain protective of human health. It
should be noted that his screening-level evaluation did not consider the potential total risk associated
with multiple groundwater contaminants at a particular shallow well location.
OU1 Results of VISL Evaluation of the Groundwater Remediation Goals
Contaminant of
Groundwater
Predicted Indoor
VISL model-
VISL Model-
Concern
Remedial Goal
Air Concentration
Potential
Potential Hazard
Oigfl)
(|ig/m3) for
Residential
Carcinogenic Risk
for Residential
Quotient for
Residential
Exposure
Exposure
Exposure
Chlordane
0.1
1.99E-04
7.1E-09
2.7E-04
Heptachlor epoxide
0.05
4.29E-05
4.0E-08
NA
Notes:
VISL = Vapor Intrusion Screening Level
NA = Not Available
(j.g/1 = micro grains per liter
H g/m3 = m icro gra ms p er cubic m e ter
OU3
Groundwater
The exposure assumptions, toxicity data, clean-up levels, and RAOs used at the time of the remedy are
still valid for the COCs for OU3 except chloroform, cDCE, and 1,1,2-trichloroethane. The analysis in
Appendix F indicates that the groundwater remediation goal for chloroform exceeds a cancer risk of
lxlO4, and the remediation goals for cis-l,2-dichloroethene and 1,1,2-trichloroethane exceed a
noncancerHQ of 1. None of the remaining cleanup goals resulted in a cancer risk greater than lxlO"4 for
carcinogens or a noncancerHQ of greater than 1, and therefore remain protective of human health. The
current land use remains unchanged and groundwater is not being used as a potable water source.
OU3 Groundwater ARAR Comparison of Remediation Goals and Current Standards
Contaminant of
Concern
2006 ROD
Amendment
Groundwater
Remediation
Goal (|ig/l)
2006 ROD
Amendment
Cleanup
Level
Rationale
(|ig/l)
Current NC
2La (As of
April 1,
2013) (fig/1)
Current Federal
MCL/CRQL
(|ig/l)
Change
in
ARAR
Yes/No
Carbon Tetrachloride
0.269
2L
0.3
5/0.50
Yesb
Chloroform
70
2L
70
80c/0.50
No
1,1 -Dichloroethene
7
2L/MCL
350
7/0.50
Yesb
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
70
2L/MCL
70
70/0.50
No
1,2-Dichloropropane
0.51
2L
0.6
5/0.50
Yesb
Methylene Chloride
4.6
2L
5
5/0.50
Yesb
Perchloroethene
0.7
2L
0.7
5/0.50
No
F-3
-------
Contaminant of
Concern
2006 ROD
Amendment
Groundwater
Remediation
Goal (|ig/l)
2006 ROD
Amendment
Cleanup
Level
Rationale
(|ig/l)
Current NC
2La (As of
April 1,
2013) (fig/1)
Current Federal
MCL/CRQL
(|ig/l)
Change
in
ARAR
Yes/No
1,1,2-iricnioroetnane
IV1LL
JN A
i/u.iu
1NO
Trichloroethene
2.8
2L
3
5/0.50
Yesb
Vinyl Chloride
0.015
2L
0.03
2/0.50
Yesb
Notes:
CRQL = Contract Required Quantitation Limit
MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level
NA = Not Available
a 2L = NC 2L of North Carolina Administrative Code, Title 15 A, Subchapter 2L, Classifications and Water Quality Standards Applicable to the
Groundwater of North Carolina
b ARAR has changed but ROD remediation goal is more stringent than the current new standard.
c MCL as total trihalomethanes.
jug/1 = micrograms per liter
OU3 Review of Risk-Based Groundwater Remediation Goals or Remediation Goals with a Change
in ARAR
Contaminant of
Concern
Groundwater
Remedial Goal
Oigfl)
Tap water
RSLa 10-6
Risk
(u.g/l)
Tap water
RSLa HQ =
1
(U.g/l)
Riskb
HQC
Carbon Tetrachloride
0.269
4.6E-01
4.9E+01
5.8E-07
5.5E-03
Chloroform
70
2.2E-01
9.7E+01
3.2E-04
7.2E-01
1,1 -Dichloroethene
7
NA
2.8E+02
NA
2.5E-02
cis-1,2-
Dichloroethene
70
NA
3.6E+01
NA
1.9E+00
1,2-Dichloropropane
0.51
8.5E-01
8.2E+00
6.0E-07
6.2E-02
Methylene Chloride
4.6
1.1E+01
1.1E+02
4.2E-07
4.2E-02
Perchloroethylene
0.7
1.1E+01
4.1E+01
6.4E-08
1.7E-02
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
5
2.8E-01
4.1E-01
1.8E-05
1.2E+01
Trichloroethene
2.8
4.9E-01
2.8E+00
5.7E-06
1.0E+00
Vinyl Chloride
0.015
1.9E-02
4.4E+01
7.9E-07
3.4E-04
Notes:
NA = Not Available
a) Current EPARegional ScreeningLevels (RSLs), datedNovember2020, are available at
https://www.epa.gov/risk/regional-screeiiiiig-levels-rsls-generic-tables
b) Cancerrisk = (remedialgoal/cancer-based RSL)x 10"6
c) HQ= HazardQuotient=(reniedialgoal/noncancerRSL).
(j.g/1 = micro grams per liter
Vapor Intrusion
Indoor air concentrations were calculated from groundwater remediation levels for the two volatile
chemicals of concern. The table below indicatesthat none of the cleanup goals resulted in a cancer risk
F-4
-------
greater than lx 10"4 for carcinogens or a noncancer HQ of greater than 1, and therefore remain
protective of human health. This screening-level evaluation did not consider the potential total risk
associated with multiple groundwater contaminants at a particular shallow well location.
OU3 Results of VISL Evaluation of the Groundwater Remediation Goals
Contaminant of
Concern
Groundwater
Remedial
Goal (|ig/l)
Predicted Indoor
Air Concentration
(|ig/m3) for
Residential
Exposure
VISL model-
Potential
Carcinogenic Risk
for Residential
Exposure
VISL Model-
Potential Hazard
Quotient for
Residential
Exposure
Carbon Tetrachloride
0.269
3.04E-01
6.5E-07
2.9E-03
Chloroform
70
1.05E+01
8.6E-05
1.0E-01
1,1 -Dichloroethene
7
7.47E+00
NA
3.6E-02
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
70
NA
NA
NA
1,2-Dichloropropane
0.51
5.88E-02
7.8E-08
1.4E-02
Methylene Chloride
4.6
6.11E-01
6.0E-09
9.8E-04
Perchloroethylene
0.7
5.07E-01
4.7E-08
1.2E-02
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
5
1.68E-01
9.6E-07
8.1E-01
Trichloroethene
2.8
1.13E+00
2.4E-06
5.4E-01
Vinyl Chloride
0.015
1.70E-02
1.0E-07
1.6E-04
Notes:
VISL = Vapor Intrusion Screening Level
NA = Not Available
jug/1 = micrograms per liter
p.g/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter
F-5
-------
APPENDIX G
COMMUNITY RELATIONS
G-l
-------
Statesvilie Record & Landmark
Advertising Affidavit
Account Number
xxxxxxx
Date
January 05, 2021
SKEO SOLUTIONS
Description
Ad Number
Ad Size
01/05/2021 Legal Notices SKEO/EPA-FCX, INC. STATESVILLE SUPERFUND SITE 0000694442 2 x 6.00 IN
Publisher of
Statesvilie Record & Landmark
Iredell County
Before the undersigned, a Notary Public duly commissioned, qualified,
and authorized by law to administer oaths, personally appeared the
Publisher's Representative who by being duly sworn deposes and says:
that he/she is authorized to make this affidavit and sworn statement; that
the notice or other legal advertisement, a copy of which is attached hereto,
was published in the Record Landmark on the following dates:
01/05/2021
and that the said newspaper in which such notice, paper document, or
legal advertisement was published, was at the time of each and every such
publication, a newspaper meeting all the requirements and qualifications
Newspaper reference: 0000694442
Sworn to and subscribed before me, this 5th day of January, 2021.
County of Hanover Commonwealth of Virginia
Mv commission exoires: Notary Registration No, 7904041
CotttmissiSn &xp~Tan 31, 2024
THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU
G-2
-------
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4
Announces the Fourth Five-Year Review for
the FCX, Inc. {Statesville Plant) Superfund Site,
Statesville, Iredell County, North Carolina
Purpose/Objective: The EPA is conducting a Five-Year Review of tie remedy for the FCX, Inc.
(Statesville Plant) Superfund site (the Site) in Statesville. North Carolina. The purpose of the Five-Year
Review is to make sure the selected cleanup actions effectively protect human health and the
Site Background: The Site consists of the 5 5-acre former FCX property and the 15-acre former
Burlington industries property. Around 1940, FGX began operating an agricultural supply distribution
center on site. Activities included formulating, repackaging, storing and distributing pesticides,
fertilizers and feed grains. Activities continued until FCX declared bankruptcy in 1986. From 1986
to 1990, there were several environmental studies at the former FCX property. These studies found
pesticide contamination in the soil and pesticide and volatile organic compound (VOC) contamination
in the groundwater. Site investigations detected an additional contaminant source originating from
the Burlington industries textile plant, located immediately north of the FCX property. The EPA listed
the Site on the Superfund program's National Priorities List (NPL) in 1990.
Cleanup Actions: The EPA designated three operable unite to address site contamination. The
EPA signed the OU-i and OU-2 Records of Decision (ROOs) in September 1993 and November
1994, respectively, to address groundwater and soil contamination on and south of the former FCX
property. The EPA signed the OU-3 ROD in September 1996 to address VOC contamination on and
around the former Burlington industries property Since 1998. the OU-1 remedy has addressed
contaminated groundwater at the former FCX property and south of the FCX property, in 2006, the
EPA issued a ROD Amendment to change the OU-1 groundwater remedy from pump-and-treat
technology to monitored natural attenuation. Completed in 2001, the OU-2 remedy addressed
pesticide soil contamination on the former FCX property. The OU-3 remedy uses air sparging, soil
vapor extraction and monitored natural attenuation to address soil and groundwater contaminated
with VOCs on and around the former Burlington property. The EPA issued an Explanation of
Significant Differences (ESD) in September 2006 to enhance the OU3 remedy with accelerated
natural attenuation. The EPA issued another ESD in August 2015 to enhance the OU-3 remedy by
adding angled injection to address VOCs in shallow groundwater in the northern drainage area.
Five-Year Review Schedule: The National Contingency Plan requires review of remedial actions
that result, in any hazardous substances, pollutants or contaminants remaining at the Site above
levels that allow for unlimited use and unrestricted exposure every five years to ensure the
protection of human health and the environment. The fourth of the Five-Year Reviews for the Site will
be completed by August 2021. When the Five-Year Review is completed, it will be available online at
The EPA Invites Community Participation in the Five-Year Review Process: The EPA is
conducting this Five-Year Review to evaluate the effectiveness of the Site's remedy and to ensure
that the remedy remains protective of human health and the environment. As part of the Five-Year
Review process, EPA staff is available to answer any questions about the Site. Community members
who have questions about the Site or the Five-Year Review process, or who would like to participate
in a community interview, are asked to contact:
Allan Hernandez EPA Remedial Angela Miller, EPA Community Involvement
Project Manager Coordinator
Phone: (470) 698-9164 Phone: (678) 575-8132
Email: hernandez.allan@eDa.Qov Email: miller.anaelatoa.Qov
Mailing Address; U.S. EPA Region 4,61 Forsyth Street, S.W., 11th Floor, Atlanta, GA 30303-8960
More information is available at the Site's local document repository, Iredell County Public Library,
located at 135 East Water Street in Statesville, North Carolina 28677 (consider contacting the library
to confirm It is open), and online at www.eoa.Wsu perfiiral/fcx-statesyille-piant
environment.
G-3
-------
cc v \j\
Five-Year Review
' interview s-onn
Site Name: FCX, INC. STATESVILLE
EPA ID No.: NCD095458527
Interviewer name: Allan Hernandez
Affiliation: EPA
Subject Name: Conan Fitzgerald
Affiliation: AECOM
Subiect Contact Information: conan.fitzgeraldPaecom
.com
Time (email)
Date: 6/10/21
Interview Location: AECOM Morrisville office (email)
Interview Format (circle one): In Person Phone Mail X
Other:
Interview Category: Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs)
1. What is your overall impression of the remedial activities at the Site?
Approximately 6,600 kilograms (over 14,000 pounds) of Perchloroethylene (PCE) were removed from the subject
site by the source area system, resulting in improved groundwater quality within the footprint of the building
and vicinity on all sides. Improvement in groundwater quality has been especially evident downgradient, which
will only accelerate with the new sparge system. The BOS 100™ angled injections have proven very effective for
minimizing impacts in the Northern Drainage as well. The technologies applied are effectively treating a difficult
contaminant in a complex hydrogeologic environment.
2. What have been the affects of this site on the surrounding community, if any?
Over the past five years, the affects have been negligible. El Paso Natural Gas (EPNG) has worked to minimize
trespassing while maintaining structural assets and keeping up with landscaping to minimize the potential
negative effects in the community from an inactive facility. Given land use and the lack of active receptor
pathways, there are no current risks to the surrounding community.
3. What is your assessment of the current performance of the remedy in place at the Site?
EPNG installed a new air sparge system in the seep area to accelerate groundwater remediation downgradient
of the developed portion. We anticipate that this will improve both groundwater and surface water quality in
the next few years, but the new system is too new to provide a quantitative assessment.
4. Are you aware of any complaints or inquiries regarding environmental issues or the remedial action from
residents since implementation of the cleanup?
Stakeholder engagement on this project prior to 2016 was extensive and has been detailed in previous five-year
reviews. However, complaints and inquiries from surrounding residents have been minimal during the past five
years.
• In 2017 the resident at 857 Wendover Drive noticed that a handful of trees in his backyard were dying at
around the same time and was concerned that the "funk" from the Superfund site had entered his property,
which abuts an OU3 parcel. EPNG hired an arborist to examine the trees. He was able to determine natural
causes for the dead trees. In particular, most of the affected trees had been planted at the same time in
similar sized dug holes. The root systems had run out of space due to the dense, shallow native soils, and
choked themselves off. Similar trees planted at the same time in similar holes were suffering similar
afflictions. No further action was necessary.
• In 2019 the resident at 1536 Yadkin Street inquired about additional activity at the site, as AECOM was
installing the pad for the new air sparge system. AECOM explained about the work and kept the resident
informed during subsequent phases.
G-4
-------
5. Do you feel well-informed regarding the Site's activities and remedial progress? If not, how might EPA
convey site related information in the future?
As the engineering consultant directing the Site activities and remedial progress, this question is not applicable.
6. Do you have any comments, suggestions, or recommendations regarding the management or operation of
the Site's remedy?
Not at this time.
G-5
-------
APPENDIX H
Oi l 2020 MNA O&M MONITORING WELL SAMPLING REPORT
H-1
-------
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Waste Management, Superfund Section
217 West Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27603
Waste Management
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
OU-1 Monitored Natural Attenuation Operation & Maintenance
Monitoring Well Sampling Report
FCX-Statesville Superfund Site
Statesville, North Carolina
Dates of Study: October 19, 2020
NCD 095 458 527
NCDEQ Remedial Project Manager: Beth Hartzell
NC Superfund Section
217 West Jones Street
1646 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
NCDEQ Operation & Maintenance Project Manager: Doug Rumford
NC Superfund Section
217 West Jones Street
1646 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699
December 2020
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
1.0 Introduction 1
2.0 Background 1
3.0 Previous Sampling Results 2
4.0 Field Activities 3
4.1 Scope of Work and Sampling Protocols 3
4.2 Sample Analysis 4
4.3 Quality Control/Quality Assurance 5
4.4 RGs and Investigation Derived Waste 5
5.0 Investigation Results and Summary of Groundwater Analytical Data 6
5.1 ROD Compounds 6
5.2 Other Organochlorine Pesticide Compounds 6
6.0 Conclusions 7
7.0 Observations 7
LIST OF FIGURES
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: OU-1 Operation & Maintenance Summary of Sampling Locations
Table 2: OU-1 Operation & Maintenance Groundwater Analytical Results
Table 3: OU-1 Historical Groundwater Analytical Results
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A - Site Health and Safety Plan
APPENDIX B - Field Log Book
APPENDIX C - Laboratory Report of Analysis
-------
1.0 Introduction
On October 19, 2020, personnel from the Superfund Section of the Waste
Management Division, North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ)
conducted a groundwater sampling investigation at the FCX-Statesville National Priorities
List (NPL) Site located in Statesville, North Carolina. The work performed included annual
sampling of six monitoring wells existing on site. Sampling was conducted as part of the
Operation & Maintenance (O&M) phase of the continued Monitored Natural Attenuation
(MNA) of organochlorine pesticide contamination in groundwater.
Federally Funded (Fund-financed) remediation at this site consists of efforts to
restore groundwater quality to conditions protective of human health and the environment.
At such sites, the Remedial Action phase consists of active groundwater treatment and/or
other remedial measures, until completion or for a maximum period of ten years. The
subsequent Operation and Maintenance (O&M) phase consists of continued operations to
support and confirm the effectiveness of the Remedial Action.
Pursuant to Section 300.510 (c) (1) of the National Oil and Hazardous Substances
Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP), the State must assume responsibility for O&M at Fund-
financed sites. This activity was undertaken by the State of North Carolina following
completion of the ten-year Remedial Action (RA) period by the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (USEPA) Region IV.
2.0 Background
The FCX-Statesville (FCX) Site is located at the intersection of Phoenix Street and
West Front Street (Highway 90), approximately 1.5 miles west of downtown Statesville,
Iredell County, North Carolina (Figure 1). The site consists of the former FCX property
and the former Burlington Industries textile plant property to the north. The neighborhood
is mixed residential and commercial.
FCX, Inc. repackaged and distributed agricultural chemicals on a 5-acre site from
1940 to 1985. Liquid and powdered pesticides were repackaged at the site until 1969.
According to FCX, Inc., more than 5 tons of pesticides were buried under the facility's
concrete warehouse floor prior to 1969. Spills also occurred in areas where pesticides were
handled. FCX, Inc., filed for Chapter 1 1 bankruptcy status and began liquidating its assets
in September 1985
From 1986 to 1990, on-site investigations revealed pesticide contamination in soil,
and pesticide and volatile organic compound (VOC) contamination in groundwater.
The Hazard Ranking System (HRS) was utilized to quantify a numerical score for the Site
and qualify it for proposal and placement on the NPL. The Site was proposed for addition
to the NPL in June 1988 with finalized listing occurring in February 1990.
1
-------
The EPA conducted a Remedial Action/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) on site from 1991 -
1993. RI results indicated that VOCs in groundwater originated beneath the former
Burlington property, north of the former FCX property. The EPA signed an Administrative
Order on Consent (AOC) with Burlington Industries and El Paso Natural Gas Company
(EPNG) to conduct a separate RI/FS to characterize the VOC contamination.
After expanding the site to include both the former FCX and former Burlington
properties, the EPA divided the Site into three separate operable units (OUs), each with
specific remedies. Operable Unit 1 consisted of pesticide-contaminated groundwater
beneath the former FCX property and properties to the south. OU-1 groundwater
remediation consisted of active remediation by extraction, treatment and discharge (putnp-
and-treat) combined with monitored natural attenuation for a period of 30 years. EPA
signed the Record of Decision (ROD) for OU-1 in September 1993. Remediation
commenced in 1998. The OU-2 and OU-3 ROD's were signed in November 1994 and
September 1996, respectively, with OlJ-2 addressing soil contamination on the former
FCX property and OU-3 addressing VOC contamination on and around the former
Burlington property.
In September 2006, EPA amended the OU-1 groundwater remedy, removing active
(pump and treat) remediation and leaving MNA in place. The Amendment additionally
removed metals, VOCs, and semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) as OU-1
Contaminants of Concern (COCs). The OU-3 remedy uses air sparging (AS), soil vapor
extraction (SVE), and MNA technology to address soil and groundwater contaminated with
VOCs on and around the former Burlington property. By May 2012, pesticide
contaminant concentrations in groundwater appeared to have stabilized. Therefore on June
3, 2012, EPA approved a revision to the Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) such that the
scope of work would be changed to allow for future groundwater sampling events to be
conducted on an annual basis.
3.0 Previous sampling Results
EPA sampling in March and August 2008 detected four of the six pesticides
identified in the ROD: alpha-BHC, beta-BHC, gamma-BHC and Dieldrin. ROD
contaminants gamma-chlordane and heptachlor epoxide were not present, but delta-BHC
and Endrin ketone were each detected in one sample.
At Station MW1 (sample MW 102GW) concentrations of the four detected ROD
contaminants each exceeded their respective groundwater Remediation Goals (RGs). The
sample also contained delta-BHC (0.29 ug/1). At Station MW2 (sample MW202GW),
alpha- and beta-BHC exceeded RGs. Gamma-BHC was detected below its RG. The
sample also contained Endrin ketone (0.92 ug/1). At Station MW3 (sample MW302GW),
beta-BHC exceeded its RG. Gamma-BHC was detected below its RG.
2
-------
The first sampling event conducted by NCDEQ subsequent to assuming the
responsibility for O&M by the State of North Carolina was performed during December
10-14, 2009. Laboratory analytical results from this event validated the historical data for
ROD specified compounds provided by the US EPA. However, five additional pesticides
not identified as ROD compounds; delta-BHC, 4,4'-DDE, Endrin, Endrin ketone, and
Toxaphene, were also detected in samples MW-1, MW-2, and MW-3. Delta-BHC was
detected in samples MW-1 and MW-3 at levels exceeding the North Carolina
Administrative Code 2L (NCAC 2L) groundwater standard. Toxaphene was detected in
sample MW-3 at a concentration that exceeded its NCAC 2L standard; 4,4'-DDE was also
detected in this sample, however, a North Carolina groundwater standard does not exist for
comparison.
4.0 Field Activities
4.1 Scope of Work and Sampling Protocols
Ten groundwater monitoring wells were originally specified for MNA sampling.
Sample locations are illustrated in Figure 2 and summarized in Table 1. The Hydrasleeve
no-purge sampling method consists of lowering one or more Hydrasleeve polyethylene
bags (on a weighted tether) into a monitoring well's screened interval. Following a
groundwater equilibration period (minimum two days), the unit is withdrawn from the well,
filling the Hydrasleeve and "coring" a standing groundwater volume from the screen
interval. Hydrasleeve units compatible with on-site monitoring wells measure 1.75 inch
diameter and 36 inches or 48 inches in length; when filled, they produce sample volumes
of 1.25 L or >1.5 L, respectively.
Monitoring well MW-23S characteristically contains a standing water column
measuring approximately 3 to 6 feet, an interval considered marginally sufficient for
Hydrasleeve sampling. Therefore, the alternative sampling method for this well is to install
a pre-cleaned length of sample tubing into the screen interval. Following the initial
groundwater equilibration period, all future sampling of the well will be completed via
micro-purge sampling using a surface peristaltic pump.
During the December 14, 2010 sampling event, it was discovered that the weighted
anchor attached to the tether holding the suspended Hydrasleeve in well MW-24S had
become lodged within the well casing. After repeated attempts to dislodge the anchor, a
determination was made to proceed with micro-purge sampling using the surface peristaltic
pump. Future sampling of monitoring well MW-24S will be conducted via this method
until such time as the weighted tether can be dislodged.
Upon arrival at the site for the May 15, 2017 sampling event, NC Superfund
personnel discovered that the above ground stick-up portion of monitoring well MW-5s
had been destroyed. The above ground stick-up portion of monitoring well MW-3 was also
severely damaged to the point of being unsamplable. This damage most likely occurred
due to a vehicular collision given their proximity to the roadway.
3
-------
As a result, these two monitoring wells were not sampled and were removed from the
sampling routine going forward.
During the October 19, 2020 sampling event, the weighted tether and Hydrasleeve
sampler at monitoring well MW-42i became lodged within the well casing during removal.
The tether snapped with the Hydrasleeve remaining in the well casing approximately 20
feet below land surface. As a result, no sample was collected from MW-42L The tether
and weighted sampler were subsequently replaced allowing for continued sampling of
MW-42i during future events.
All groundwater samples were collected and handled in accordance with the EPA
Region 4 SESI) Field Branches Quality System and Technical Procedures. Because the
monitoring wells are allowed to pre-equilibrate with minimal pre-sample purging, no
groundwater field parameter measurements (temperature, pH, conductivity, turbidity) were
conducted. The Site Health and Safety Plan is included in Appendix A while the field
activity notes and sampling log are included in Appendix B.
The following procedures were used during sample collection for all direct field
measurements and sampling activities:
Measurement Procedures
SESDPROC-105-R2, Groundwater Level and Well Depth Measurement
SESDPROC-1 10-R3, Global Positioning System
Environmental Sampling Procedures
SESDPROC-305-R3, Groundwater Sampling
SESDPROC-203-R3, Pump Operation
4.2 Sample Analysis
Sample analysis was conducted in accordance with the SESD Analytical Support
Branch Laboratory Operations and Quality Assurance Manual, February 2008. Samples
were analyzed by EPA Method 8081 for organochlorine pesticides, including the following
pesticides specified in the ROD:
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
gamma chlordane
dieldrin
heptachlor epoxide.
4
-------
4.3 Quality Control/Quality Assurance
Prior to the February 2016 sampling event, duplicate (DIJP) and Matrix
Spike/Duplicate (MS/MSD) samples were collected from monitoring well MW-42L At
that time, EON Products modified the design of their "Hydrasleeve" sampling equipment
to include a rigid PVC "Top Collar", to enhance the performance of the device (now re-
named "Supersleeve"). As a result, NC Superfund Section sampling personnel discovered
that replacement samplers could no longer be "stacked" vertically within the inner casing
of MW42i. Consequently, only one replacement sampler was installed at this monitoring
well following the November 2014 sampling event.
Therefore, from that point forward, field quality control/quality assurance for this
investigation consisted of one duplicate sample, collected at monitoring well MW-9. The
duplicate sample was identified MW-9 DIJP. Due to the decrease in number of samples
collected commencing with the May 15, 2017 sampling event, a decision was made to no
longer collect a MS/MSD sample from the site. Beginning with the May 2018 sampling
event, monitoring well MW-23S was chosen as the DIJP location and was identified as
MW-33S. Following the November 2018 sampling event, the RP Group contractor for the
adjacent El Paso Natural Gas Site requested they be allowed to abandon several monitor
wells in the area. In July 2018, USEPA granted the AECOM request and monitoring wells
MW-23S and MW-27S were subsequently abandoned in place. For the October 19, 2020
sampling event, a duplicate groundwater sample was collected from monitor well MW-24
and designated as sample MW-34. However, going forward a duplicate sample will no
longer be collected at the site during future sampling events due to the decreased number
of available monitoring wells.
4.4 RGs and Investigation derived waste
Site-specific groundwater Remediation Goals designated by the amended OU-1
ROD include 0.01 ug/1 for alpha-BHC- and beta-BHC; 0.20 ug/1 for dieldrin and gamma-
BHC (Lindane); 0.50 ug/L for heptachlor-epoxide; and 0.10 ug/L for gamma-chlordane (as
total chlordane). The sampling methods specified above do not generate a significant
volume of purge water. The sampling materials (spent hydrasleeves and transfer tubing)
will be disposed as solid waste.
The Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) for the Site O&M was developed, and
groundwater sampling performed in accordance with the NC Superfund Section Quality
Assurance Program Plan (Program Plan) and Quality Assurance Standard Operating
Procedures (QASOP). The QASOP adopts by reference the Field Branches Quality
System and Technical Procedures, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4. The
Program Plan is derived directly from the EPA-Approved NC Department of Environment
and Natural Resources QA Project Plan for Data, 2008.
5
-------
5.0 Investigation Results and Summary of Groundwater Analytical Data
The objective of this groundwater sampling investigation was to generate
organochlorine pesticide results for the six pesticide compounds listed in the ROD for the
Site. During the performance of the O&M sampling event at the former FCX Site,
groundwater samples were collected from the utilized monitoring wells as described in
Section 4.1. The observed concentrations were then compared to the established
Remediation Goals for each compound.
The identification data and location of the wells sampled for this event are indicated
on Table 1 and Figure 2 respectively. The summary of results for the Organochlorine
Pesticide Analytical Data, and the RG for each of the site specific contaminants of concern,
are found in Table 2. The laboratory Report of Analysis for all samples submitted to Pace
Analytical Services (formerly Shealy Environmental Services) is included as Appendix C.
The following discussion pertains to samples collected at stations MW-1, MW-2, and MW-
9. No organochlorine pesticides were detected in any of the other monitoring wells
sampled for this investigation (MW-6s, MW-24S).
Table 3, "OU-1 Historical Groundwater Analytical Results", summarizes the
current as well as previous US EPA and NCDEQ events sampling data; this data is also
illustrated in Figures 4 through 6. All analytical results for the October 19, 2020 sampling
event are illustrated on Figure 3.
5.1 ROD Compounds
Four of the six pesticides identified as ROD Compounds, alpha-BHC, beta-BHC,
gamma-BHC (Lindane), and Dieldrin, were detected in samples collected during this
investigation. The groundwater sample collected from monitoring well MW-1 contained
ROD pesticide compounds alpha-BHC, beta-BHC, Dieldrin, and Lindane, at
concentrations above the site RG. Monitoring well MW-9 contained ROD pesticide
compound Dieldrin at a concentration above the NCAC 2L groundwater standard but
below the site groundwater RG.
5.2 Other Organochlorine Pesticide Compounds
Delta-BHC, Endrin, and Endrin ketone were also detected in samples collected
during this investigation. As no RG's for these compounds had been established in the
ROD, the detected concentrations for each will be compared to the applicable NCAC 2L
groundwater standard. Laboratory analysis revealed the presence of Endrin, and Endrin
ketone in sample MW-9 at concentrations below the NCAC 2L. Sample MW-2 contained
elevated levels of Endrin and Endrin ketone at concentrations being below the NCAC 2L.
Sample MW-1 contained an elevated detection of delta-BHC at a concentration exceeding
the NCAC 2L.
6
-------
6.0 Conclusions
Five groundwater monitoring wells were sampled by NCDEQ personnel during the
October 2020 Annual O&M phase of the FCX-Statesville OU-1 MNA remedy. The
collected groundwater samples were submitted to Pace Analytical Services (formerly
Shealy Environmental Services) and analyzed for organochlorine pesticides. Two
monitoring wells, MW-3 and MW-5s were found destroyed and determined to be
unsamplable during the May 2017 sampling event. Two monitoring wells, MW-23S and
MW-27S were abandoned in place during July 2018. As a result, these four wells have
been dropped from the site sampling routine. One monitoring well, MW-42i was not
sampled in 2020 due to equipment failure.
Seven organochlorine pesticide compounds, including four of the OU-1 ROD
specified compounds (alpha-BHC, beta-BHC, Lindane, and Dieldrin,) were detected in
samples from three of the FCX wells (MW-1, MW-2, and MW-9).
Observed concentrations for alpha-BHC, beta-BHC, Dieldrin, and Lindane
exceeded their respective RGs in the sample collected from monitoring well MW-1. For
sample MW-2, two pesticides not identified as ROD compounds (Endrin, and Endrin
ketone) were detected. ROD compound Dieldrin and n on-ROD compounds Endrin, and
Endrin Ketone were all detected in the MW-9 sample, with the Dieldrin concentration
exceeding the NCAC 2L standard but not the ROD Remediation Level.
7.0 Observations
Generally, a stable to downward trend in the constituent concentrations was evident
in monitoring well MW-1 since the March 2008 sampling event. Results of the October
2020 sampling event indicate a year over year increase in the respective concentrations of
alpha-BHC, beta-BHC, and Lindane. Dieldrin and delta-BHC were also detected following
sporadic absences at MW-1.
Constituent concentrations were relatively stable or decreasing in monitoring well
MW-2, except for Endrin ketone which continues to exhibit an increasing concentration
from the period of March 2008 through October 2020. After a five-year hiatus, ROD
pesticide compound beta-BHC was detected above the site RG at this location during the
2018 event and 2019 events but was not detected during the 2020 event.
Monitoring well MW-6s, which historically had never exhibited any detectable
contaminant concentrations, unexpectedly showed elevated levels of ROD organochlorine
pesticides during the May 2017 and May 2018 sampling events (beta-BHC and Lindane
respectively). There were no detectable contaminant concentrations of any kind during the
2020 event.
Monitoring well MW-9, also having never exhibited any detectable contaminant
concentrations, unexpectedly showed elevated levels of both ROD and n on-ROD
organochlorine pesticides during the July 2010 sampling event. Since October 2013, ROD
compound Dieldrin and n on-ROD compounds, Endrin and Endrin ketone were consistently
detected in the monitoring well MW-9 samples.
7
-------
The concentrations of these three compounds appear to be relatively stable over the last six
years with Dieldrin routinely exceeding the NCAC 2L standard as was the case during the
2020 event.
Two of the wells with detectable concentrations of organochlorine pesticides (MW-
1 and MW-2) are located in close proximity to and generally down-gradient of the former
FCX-Statesville structure on the North side of West Front Street. Monitoring well MW-9
is located upgradient and adjacent to the northeast comer of the former FCX-Statesville
structure. No pesticides were detected in any of the samples collected from wells located
down-gradient and south of West Front Street.
It should be noted that the property is currently operated in a warehousing type of
capacity and that improvements to the general condition of the site have been made. In
particular, debris has been removed from the drainage ditch along the railway easement
and the gutter system for the building has been repaired. These two improvements now
facilitate the proper drainage of site runoff and alleviate the problem of pooling surface
water at the location of monitoring well MW-9. Also, site access is now fully restricted
due to repairs made to the perimeter fencing.
8
-------
FIGURES
FCX-Statesville Superfund Site NCDENR Superfund Section
NCD 095 458 527 December 2020
-------
SMSS'W
80,:,55'0"W
Map Extent:
Iredell County
Legend
| Approximate Site Boundary
General Site Location
Site Name: FCX-Statesville Superfund Site
Site Number: NCD 095 458 527
Scale:
1:23,288
Date:
1993 USGS Topo Quad. Statesville West
March 17. 2010 map
Figure
1
Prepared by:
-------
* '
r#» ft
MW-9
Map Extent:
Iredell Coiuity
Legend
© Monitoring Well
Approximate Site Boundary
Site Map with Monitoring Well Locations
Site Name: FCX-Statesville Superfund Site
Site Number: NCD 095 458 527
Scale:
1:2,000
Date: 2005 Aerial Image, March 17, 2010 map
Figure
Prepared by:
-------
Legend
# Monitoring Well
L ^ Approximate Site Boundary
Pesticide Concentration (Bold
ug/L indicates value greater than
ROD remediation level).
County Location
Scale: 0
100 ft
FCX Corporation
Statesville, Iredell County, NC
EPA ID#: NCD 095 458 527
Fig. 3: Site Map with Pesticide Concentrations
Sampling Date:
10/19/2020
Aerial Image;
March 9, 2011
-------
Figure 4
Monitoring Well MW-1 Constituent Concentrations
Date Sampled
-------
Figure 5
Monitoring Well MW-2 Constituent Concentrations
3
2.5
-------
Figure 6
Monitoring Well MW-9 Constituent Concentrations
jr jf jr ^ j? j? J* J? ^
^ «>v
¦MMM^MMMB j^g^' BH C
—8»—gamma-BHC (Lindane)
am^M® Dieldrin
••«»*— Endosulfan ii
4 4~DDT
Endrin
Endrin ketone
•Heptachlor epoxide
-------
TABLES
FCX-Statesville Superfund Site NCDENR Superfund Section
NCD 095 458 527 December 2020
-------
Table 1
0U-1 Operation & Maintenance Summary of Sampling Locations
FCX-Statesville Site
Well ID
DENR
Sample
ID
(Dec.
2010)
EPA Sample
ID
(April 2009)
Total
Depth
(ft bgs)
Depth to
Water (ft toe)
10/19/2020
Casing
Stick-lJp
(ft)
Depth to Water
(ft bgs)
10/19/2020
Sampling Method
MW-1
MW-1
MW103GW
40.90
18.89
2.30
16.59
Hydrasleeve no-purge
MW-2
MW-2
MW203GW
48.65
24.37
2.05
22.32
Hydrasleeve no-purge
MW-6S
MW-6S
MW6S03GW
50.29
30.07
4.35
25.72
Hydrasleeve no-purge
MW-9
MW-9
MW903GW
41.75
26.06
3.50
22.56
Hydrasleeve no-purge
W-24S
MW-24S
W24S03GW
20.82
2.18
Flush
Mount
2.18
Peristaltic micro-purge
W-42I
MW-42I
W42I03GW
88.50
24.90
Flush
Mount
24.90
Hydrasleeve no-purge
ft bgs : feet below ground surface
ft toe : feet below top of casing
NS : not surveyed, not sampled
-------
Table 2
OU-1 Operation and Maintenance Groundwater Analytical Results
FCX-Statesville Site
ROD
MW-34S
NCAC 2L
Remediation
MW-1
MW-2
MW-6S
MW-9
MW-42I
MW-24S
(MW-24S Dup)
CONSTITUENT
(ug/L)
Level (ug/L)
10/19/2020
10/19/2020
10/19/2020
10/19/2020
10/19/2020
10/19/2020
10/19/2020
Pesticide Method 8081B
(ug/L)
Aldrin
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
alpha-BHC*
002
0.01
2.7
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
beta-BHC*
002
0.01
1.1
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
delta-BHC
002
N/A
0.32
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
gamma-BHC (Lindane)*
003
0.2
1.3
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
alpha-Chlordane
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
gamma-Chlordane*
0.1
0.1
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
4,4-DDD
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
4,4-DDE
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
4,4-DDT
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
Dieldrin*
0.002
0.1
0.25
-
-
0.06
N/A
-
-
Endosulfan I
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
Endosulfan II
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
Endosulfan sulfate
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
Endrin
2.0
N/A
-
0.11
-
0.47
N/A
-
-
Endrin aldehyde
2.0
N/A
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
Endrin ketone
2.0
N/A
-
1.6
-
0.23
N/A
-
-
Heptachlor
0.008
N/A
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
Heptachlor epoxide*
0.004
0.05
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
Methoxychlor
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
Toxaphene
0.03
N/A
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
Notes:
NCAC 2L = NorthCarolina Administrative Code groundwater standard
N/A = Well Destroyed; No criteria available; Not Sampled
- = Not detected above the practical quantitation limit (PQL)
ug/L = micrograms per liter
Bold indicates results exceed ROD remediation level
Shaded cells indicate detection above NCAC 2L
P = The relative percent difference (RPD) between two GC columns exceeds 40%
* = Record of Decision (ROD) identified compound
-------
Table 3
OU-1 Historical Groundwater Analytical Results
FCX-Statesville Site
CONSTITUENT
NCAC 2L
(ug/L)
ROD
Remediation
Level (ug/L)
MW-1
03/18/2008
MW-1
08/26/2008
MW-1
12/14/2009
MW-1
7/7/2010
MW-1
12/14/2010
MW-1
8/30/2011
MW-1
5/30/2012
MW-1
12/4/2012
Pesticide Method 8081B
(ug/L)
Aldrin
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
alpha-BHC*
002
0.01
3.4
2.7
0.69
1.1
2.1
1.7
2.2
2.3
beta-BHC*
002
0.01
2.1
1.3
0.082
0.38
0.65
0.28
0.29
0.64
delta-BHC
002
N/A
0.39
0.29
0.035
0.093
-
0.07
0.12
-
gamma-BHC (Lindane)*
0.03
0.2
1.4
1.2
0.56
1.1
2.1
3.2
3.6
2.2
alpha-Chlordane
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
gamma-Chlordane*
0.1
0.1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDD
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDE
N/A
N/A
-
-
.
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDT
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Dieldrin*
0.002
0.1
0.61
0.45
0.079
-
0.11
-
0.074
-
Endosulfan I
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endosulfan II
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endosulfan sulfate
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin
2.0
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin aldehyde
2.0
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin ketone
2.0
N/A
0.3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Heptachlor
0.008
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Heptachlor epoxide*
0.004
0.05
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Methoxychlor
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Toxaphene
0.03
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Notes:
A = Sample containers received by laboratory broken, no sample analysis
NCAC 2L = NorthCarolina Administrative Code groundwater standard
N/A = No criteria available
- = Not detected above the practical quantitation limit (PQL)
ug/L = micrograms per liter
Bold indicates results exceed ROD remediation level
Shaded cells indicate detection above NCAC 2L
P = The relative percent difference (RPD) between two GC columns exceeds 40%
* = Record of Decision (ROD) identified compound
Page 1
-------
Table 3
OU-1 Historical Groundwater Analytical Results
FCX-Statesville Site
CONSTITUENT
NCAC 2L
(ug/L)
ROD
Remediation
Level (ug/L)
MW-1
10/29/2013
MW-1
11/12/2014
MW-1
2/29/2016
MW-1
5/17/2017
MW-1
5/1/2018
MW-1
6/17/2019
MW-1
10/19/2020
MW-2
03/18/2008
Pesticide Method 8081B
(ug/L)
Aldrin
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
alpha-BHC*
002
0.01
2.4
2.1
0.92
1.3
0.97
1.2
2.7
0.46
beta-BHC*
002
0.01
1.1
0.96
0.95
-
0.35
0.83
1.1
0.14
delta-BHC
002
N/A
-
-
-
-
0.074
0.11
0.32
-
gamma-BHC (Lindane)*
0.03
0.2
2.2
2.2
0.99
0.87
0.59
0.74
1.3
0.15
alpha-Chlordane
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
gamma-Chlordane*
0.1
0.1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDD
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDE
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDT
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Dieldrin*
0.002
0.1
0.68
0.42
-
-
0.08
0.21
0.25
-
Endosulfan I
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endosulfan II
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endosulfan sulfate
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin
2.0
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin aldehyde
2.0
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin ketone
2.0
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
0.085
-
0.92
Heptachlor
0.008
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Heptachlor epoxide*
0.004
0.05
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Methoxychlor
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Toxaphene
0.03
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Notes:
A = Sample containers received by laboratory broken, no sample analysis
NCAC 2L = NorthCarolina Administrative Code groundwater standard
N/A = No criteria available
- = Not detected above the practical quantitation limit (PQL)
ug/L = micrograms per liter
Bold indicates results exceed ROD remediation level
Shaded cells indicate detection above NCAC 2L
P = The relative percent difference (RPD) between two GC columns exceeds 40%
* = Record of Decision (ROD) identified compound
Page 2
-------
Table 3
OU-1 Historical Groundwater Analytical Results
FCX-Statesville Site
CONSTITUENT
NCAC 2L
(ug/L)
ROD
Remediation
Level (ug/L)
MW-2
08/26/2008
MW-2
12/14/2009
MW-2
7/7/2010
MW-2
12/14/2010
MW-2
8/30/2011
MW-2
5/30/2012
MW-2
12/4/2012
MW-2
10/29/2013
Pesticide Method 8081B
(ug/L)
Aldrin
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
alpha-BHC*
002
0.01
0.47
0.16
0.25
0.27
0.11
0.05
-
-
beta-BHC*
002
0.01
0.15
0.14
0.16
0.19
0.16
0.13
-
-
delta-BHC
002
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
gamma-BHC (Lindane)*
003
0.2
0.14
0.059
0.081
0.079
0.039
-
-
-
alpha-Chlordane
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
gamma-Chlordane*
0.1
0.1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDD
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDE
N/A
N/A
-
.
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDT
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.18
-
Dieldrin*
0.002
0.1
-
0.037
-
0.12
-
-
0.062
-
Endosulfan I
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endosulfan II
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endosulfan sulfate
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin
2.0
N/A
-
0.11
0.11
0.41
0.21
0.15
0.32
0.39
Endrin aldehyde
2.0
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin ketone
2.0
N/A
0.92
0.97
1.6
1.8
1.8
1.9
1.8
2.2
Heptachlor
0.008
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Heptachlor epoxide*
0.004
0.05
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Methoxychlor
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Toxaphene
0.03
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Notes:
A = Sample containers received by laboratory broken, no sample analysis
NCAC 2L = NorthCarolina Administrative Code groundwater standard
N/A = No criteria available
- = Not detected above the practical quantitation limit (PQL)
ug/L = micrograms per liter
Bold indicates results exceed ROD remediation level
Shaded cells indicate detection above NCAC 2L
P = The relative percent difference (RPD) between two GC columns exceeds 40%
* = Record of Decision (ROD) identified compound
Page 3
-------
Table 3
OU-1 Historical Groundwater Analytical Results
FCX-Statesville Site
CONSTITUENT
NCAC 2L
(ug/L)
ROD
Remediation
Level (ug/L)
MW-2
11/12/2014
MW-2
2/29/2016
MW-2
5/17/2017
MW-2
5/1/2018
MW-2
6/17/2019
MW-2
10/19/2020
MW-3
03/18/2008
MW-3
08/26/2008
Pesticide Method 8081B
(ug/L)
Aldrin
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
alpha-BHC*
002
0.01
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
beta-BHC*
002
0.01
-
-
-
0.073
0.073
-
0.29
0.36
delta-BHC
002
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
gamma-BHC (Lindane)*
003
0.2
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.065
0.14
alpha-Chlordane
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
gamma-Chlordane*
0.1
0.1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDD
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDE
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDT
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Dieldrin*
0.002
0.1
-
-
-
0.04
0.04
-
-
-
Endosulfan I
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endosulfan II
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endosulfan sulfate
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin
2.0
N/A
0.41
-
-
0.25
0.16
0.11
-
-
Endrin aldehyde
2.0
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin ketone
2.0
N/A
2.2
1.9
2.4
1.7
1.4
1.6
-
-
Heptachlor
0.008
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Heptachlor epoxide*
0.004
0.05
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Methoxychlor
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Toxaphene
0.03
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Notes:
A = Sample containers received by laboratory broken, no sample analysis
NCAC 2L = NorthCarolina Administrative Code groundwater standard
N/A = No criteria available
- = Not detected above the practical quantitation limit (PQL)
ug/L = micrograms per liter
Bold indicates results exceed ROD remediation level
Shaded cells indicate detection above NCAC 2L
P = The relative percent difference (RPD) between two GC columns exceeds 40%
* = Record of Decision (ROD) identified compound
Page 4
-------
Table 3
OU-1 Historical Groundwater Analytical Results
FCX-Statesville Site
CONSTITUENT
NCAC 2L
(ug/L)
ROD
Remediation
Level (ug/L)
MW-3
12/14/2009
MW-3
7/7/2010
MW-3
12/14/2010
MW-3
8/30/2011
MW-3
5/30/2012
MW-3
12/4/2012
MW-3
10/29/2013
MW-3
11/12/2014
Pesticide Method 8081B
(ug/L)
Aldrin
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
alpha-BHC*
002
0.01
0.076 P
-
-
-
-
0.11 P
-
-
beta-BHC*
002
0.01
0.42
0.33
0.29
0.17
0.2
0.25
0.2
0.17
delta-BHC
002
N/A
0.062 P
-
-
-
0.051
0.045
-
-
gamma-BHC (Lindane)*
0.03
0.2
-
-
-
-
0.24
0.3
0.096
0.053
alpha-Chlordane
0.1
N/A
-
-
0.061
-
-
0.046 P
-
-
gamma-Chlordane*
0.1
0.1
-
-
-
-
-
0.028 P
-
0.029 P
4,4-DDD
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDE
N/A
N/A
0.099 P
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDT
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
0.047
-
-
-
Dieldrin*
0.002
0.1
0.062
0.07
0.11
0.053
0.049
0.048
0.038
-
Endosulfan I
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.036 P
Endosulfan II
40
N/A
-
0.089 P
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endosulfan sulfate
N/A
N/A
-
-
0.077 P
-
-
-
-
0.033
Endrin
2.0
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin aldehyde
2.0
N/A
-
-
0.045
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin ketone
2.0
N/A
0.16
0.22
0.17
0.083
0.13 P
0.11
0.082 P
0.042 P
Heptachlor
0.008
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Heptachlor epoxide*
0.004
0.05
-
0.056
-
-
-
-
-
0.033
Methoxychlor
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Toxaphene
0.03
N/A
15
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Notes:
A = Sample containers received by laboratory broken, no sample analysis
NCAC 2L = NorthCarolina Administrative Code groundwater standard
N/A = No criteria available
- = Not detected above the practical quantitation limit (PQL)
ug/L = micrograms per liter
Bold indicates results exceed ROD remediation level
Shaded cells indicate detection above NCAC 2L
P = The relative percent difference (RPD) between two GC columns exceeds 40%
* = Record of Decision (ROD) identified compound
Page 5
-------
Table 3
OU-1 Historical Groundwater Analytical Results
FCX-Statesville Site
CONSTITUENT
NCAC 2L
(ug/L)
ROD
Remediation
Level (ug/L)
MW-3
2/29/2016 Not
Sampled
MW-3
5/17/2017
Well
Destroyed
MW-5S
3/18/2008
MW-5S
08/26/2008
MW-5S
12/14/2009
MW-5S
7/7/2010
MW-5S
12/14/2010
MW-5S
8/30/2011
Pesticide Method 8081B
(ug/L)
Aldrin
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
alpha-BHC*
002
0.01
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
beta-BHC*
002
0.01
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
delta-BHC
002
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
gamma-BHC (Lindane)*
0.03
0.2
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
alpha-Chlordane
0.1
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
gamma-Chlordane*
0.1
0.1
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDD
0.1
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDE
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDT
0.1
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
Dieldrin*
0.002
0.1
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endosulfan I
40
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endosulfan II
40
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endosulfan sulfate
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin
2.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin aldehyde
2.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin ketone
2.0
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
0.065
Heptachlor
0.008
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
Heptachlor epoxide*
0.004
0.05
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
Methoxychlor
40
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
Toxaphene
0.03
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
Notes:
A = Sample containers received by laboratory broken, no sample analysis
NCAC 2L = NorthCarolina Administrative Code groundwater standard
N/A = No criteria available
- = Not detected above the practical quantitation limit (PQL)
ug/L = micrograms per liter
Bold indicates results exceed ROD remediation level
Shaded cells indicate detection above NCAC 2L
P = The relative percent difference (RPD) between two GC columns exceeds 40%
* = Record of Decision (ROD) identified compound
Page 6
-------
Table 3
OU-1 Historical Groundwater Analytical Results
FCX-Statesville Site
CONSTITUENT
NCAC 2L
(ug/L)
ROD
Remediation
Level (ug/L)
MW-5S
5/30/2012
MW-5S
12/4/2012
MW-5S
10/29/2013
MW-5S
11/12/2014
MW-5S
2/29/2016
MW-5S
5/17/2017
Well
Destroyed
MW-6S
3/18/2008
MW-6S
08/26/2008
Pesticide Method 8081B
(ug/L)
Aldrin
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
alpha-BHC*
002
0.01
-
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
beta-BHC*
002
0.01
-
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
delta-BHC
002
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
gamma-BHC (Lindane)*
003
0.2
-
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
alpha-Chlordane
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
gamma-Chlordane*
0.1
0.1
-
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
4,4-DDD
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
4,4-DDE
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
4,4-DDT
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
Dieldrin*
0.002
0.1
-
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
Endosulfan I
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
Endosulfan II
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
Endosulfan sulfate
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
Endrin
2.0
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
Endrin aldehyde
2.0
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
Endrin ketone
2.0
N/A
0.12
-
0.077
0.13
0.12
N/A
-
-
Heptachlor
0.008
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
Heptachlor epoxide*
0.004
0.05
-
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
Methoxychlor
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
Toxaphene
0.03
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
N/A
-
-
Notes:
A = Sample containers received by laboratory broken, no sample analysis
NCAC 2L = NorthCarolina Administrative Code groundwater standard
N/A = No criteria available
- = Not detected above the practical quantitation limit (PQL)
ug/L = micrograms per liter
Bold indicates results exceed ROD remediation level
Shaded cells indicate detection above NCAC 2L
P = The relative percent difference (RPD) between two GC columns exceeds 40%
* = Record of Decision (ROD) identified compound
Page 7
-------
Table 3
OU-1 Historical Groundwater Analytical Results
FCX-Statesville Site
CONSTITUENT
NCAC 2L
(ug/L)
ROD
Remediation
Level (ug/L)
MW-6S
12/14/2009
MW-6S
7/7/2010
MW-6S
12/14/2010
MW-6S
8/30/2011
MW-6S
5/30/2012
MW-6S
12/4/2012
MW-6S
10/29/2013
MW-6S
11/12/2014
Pesticide Method 8081B
(ug/L)
Aldrin
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
alpha-BHC*
002
0.01
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
beta-BHC*
002
0.01
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
delta-BHC
002
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
gamma-BHC (Lindane)*
0.03
0.2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
alpha-Chlordane
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
gamma-Chlordane*
0.1
0.1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDD
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDE
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDT
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Dieldrin*
0.002
0.1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endosulfan I
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endosulfan II
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endosulfan sulfate
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin
2.0
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin aldehyde
2.0
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin ketone
2.0
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Heptachlor
0.008
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Heptachlor epoxide*
0.004
0.05
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Methoxychlor
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Toxaphene
0.03
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Notes:
A = Sample containers received by laboratory broken, no sample analysis
NCAC 2L = NorthCarolina Administrative Code groundwater standard
N/A = No criteria available
- = Not detected above the practical quantitation limit (PQL)
ug/L = micrograms per liter
Bold indicates results exceed ROD remediation level
Shaded cells indicate detection above NCAC 2L
P = The relative percent difference (RPD) between two GC columns exceeds 40%
* = Record of Decision (ROD) identified compound
Page 8
-------
Table 3
OU-1 Historical Groundwater Analytical Results
FCX-Statesville Site
ROD
NCAC 2L
Remediation
MW-6S
MW-6S
MW-6S
MW-6S
MW-6S
MW-9
MW-9
MW-9
CONSTITUENT
(ug/L)
Level (ug/L)
2/29/2016
5/17/2017
5/1/2018
6/17/2019
10/19/2020
3/18/2008
08/26/2008
12/14/2009
Pesticide Method 8081B
(ug/L)
Aldrin
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
alpha-BHC*
002
0.01
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
beta-BHC*
002
0.01
-
0.093P
-
-
-
-
-
-
delta-BHC
002
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
gamma-BHC (Lindane)*
0.03
0.2
-
-
0.057
-
-
-
-
-
alpha-Chlordane
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
gamma-Chlordane*
0.1
0.1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDD
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDE
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDT
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Dieldrin*
0.002
0.1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endosulfan I
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endosulfan II
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endosulfan sulfate
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin
2.0
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin aldehyde
2.0
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin ketone
2.0
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Heptachlor
0.008
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Heptachlor epoxide*
0.004
0.05
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Methoxychlor
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Toxaphene
0.03
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Notes:
A = Sample containers received by laboratory broken, no sample analysis
NCAC 2L = NorthCarolina Administrative Code groundwater standard
N/A = No criteria available
- = Not detected above the practical quantitation limit (PQL)
ug/L = micrograms per liter
Bold indicates results exceed ROD remediation level
Shaded cells indicate detection above NCAC 2L
P = The relative percent difference (RPD) between two GC columns exceeds 40%
* = Record of Decision (ROD) identified compound
Page 9
-------
Table 3
OU-1 Historical Groundwater Analytical Results
FCX-Statesville Site
CONSTITUENT
NCAC 2L
(ug/L)
ROD
Remediation
Level (ug/L)
MW-9
7/7/2010
MW-9
12/14/2010
MW-9
8/30/2011
MW-9
5/30/2012
MW-9
12/4/2012
MW-9
10/29/2013
MW-9
11/12/2014
MW-9
2/29/2016
Pesticide Method 8081B
(ug/L)
Aldrin
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
alpha-BHC*
002
0.01
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
beta-BHC*
002
0.01
0.36
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
delta-BHC
002
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
gamma-BHC (Lindane)*
0.03
0.2
0.037
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
alpha-Chlordane
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
gamma-Chlordane*
0.1
0.1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDD
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDE
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDT
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
0.058
-
-
Dieldrin*
0.002
0.1
0.062
0.035
-
-
-
-
-
0.072
Endosulfan I
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endosulfan II
40
N/A
0.094 P
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endosulfan sulfate
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin
2.0
N/A
-
0.1
0.049
-
-
0.1
0.24
0.88
Endrin aldehyde
2.0
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin ketone
2.0
N/A
0.21
0.09
0.08
0.067 P
-
0.081
0.14
0.35
Heptachlor
0.008
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Heptachlor epoxide*
0.004
0.05
0.066 P
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Methoxychlor
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Toxaphene
0.03
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Notes:
A = Sample containers received by laboratory broken, no sample analysis
NCAC 2L = NorthCarolina Administrative Code groundwater standard
N/A = No criteria available
- = Not detected above the practical quantitation limit (PQL)
ug/L = micrograms per liter
Bold indicates results exceed ROD remediation level
Shaded cells indicate detection above NCAC 2L
P = The relative percent difference (RPD) between two GC columns exceeds 40%
* = Record of Decision (ROD) identified compound
Page 10
-------
Table 3
OU-1 Historical Groundwater Analytical Results
FCX-Statesville Site
CONSTITUENT
NCAC 2L
(ug/L)
ROD
Remediation
Level (ug/L)
MW-9
5/17/2017
MW-9 Dup
5/17/2017
MW-9
5/1/2018
MW-9
6/17/2019
MW-9
10/19/2020
MW-23S
3/18/2008
MW-23S
8/26/2008
MW-23S
12/14/2009
Pesticide Method 8081B
(ug/L)
Aldrin
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
alpha-BHC*
002
0.01
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
beta-BHC*
002
0.01
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
delta-BHC
002
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
gamma-BHC (Lindane)*
003
0.2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
alpha-Chlordane
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
gamma-Chlordane*
0.1
0.1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDD
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDE
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDT
0.1
N/A
-
-
0.042
-
-
-
-
-
Dieldrin*
0.002
0.1
0.046
0.042
0.049
0.059
0.06
-
-
-
Endosulfan I
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endosulfan II
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endosulfan sulfate
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin
2.0
N/A
0.41
0.4
0.43
0.35
0.47
-
-
-
Endrin aldehyde
2.0
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin ketone
2.0
N/A
0.2
0.18
0.13
0.14
0.23
-
-
-
Heptachlor
0.008
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Heptachlor epoxide*
0.004
0.05
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Methoxychlor
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Toxaphene
0.03
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Notes:
A = Sample containers received by laboratory broken, no sample analysis
NCAC 2L = NorthCarolina Administrative Code groundwater standard
N/A = No criteria available
- = Not detected above the practical quantitation limit (PQL)
ug/L = micrograms per liter
Bold indicates results exceed ROD remediation level
Shaded cells indicate detection above NCAC 2L
P = The relative percent difference (RPD) between two GC columns exceeds 40%
* = Record of Decision (ROD) identified compound
Page 11
-------
Table 3
OU-1 Historical Groundwater Analytical Results
FCX-Statesville Site
CONSTITUENT
NCAC 2L
(ug/L)
ROD
Remediation
Level (ug/L)
MW-23S
7/7/2010
MW-23S
12/14/2010
MW-23S
8/30/2011
MW-23S
5/30/2012
MW-23S
12/4/2012
MW-23S
10/29/2013
MW-23S
11/12/2014
MW-23S
2/29/2016
Pesticide Method 8081B
(ug/L)
Aldrin
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
alpha-BHC*
002
0.01
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
beta-BHC*
002
0.01
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
delta-BHC
002
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
gamma-BHC (Lindane)*
003
0.2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
alpha-Chlordane
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
gamma-Chlordane*
0.1
0.1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDD
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDE
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDT
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Dieldrin*
0.002
0.1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endosulfan I
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endosulfan II
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endosulfan sulfate
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin
2.0
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin aldehyde
2.0
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin ketone
2.0
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Heptachlor
0.008
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Heptachlor epoxide*
0.004
0.05
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Methoxychlor
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Toxaphene
0.03
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Notes:
A = Sample containers received by laboratory broken, no sample analysis
NCAC 2L = NorthCarolina Administrative Code groundwater standard
N/A = No criteria available
- = Not detected above the practical quantitation limit (PQL)
ug/L = micrograms per liter
Bold indicates results exceed ROD remediation level
Shaded cells indicate detection above NCAC 2L
P = The relative percent difference (RPD) between two GC columns exceeds 40%
* = Record of Decision (ROD) identified compound
Page 12
-------
Table 3
OU-1 Historical Groundwater Analytical Results
FCX-Statesville Site
CONSTITUENT
NCAC 2L
(ug/L)
ROD
Remediation
Level (ug/L)
MW-23S DUP
2/29/2016
MW-23S
5/17/2017
MW-23S
5/1/2018
MW-33S
Dup 5/1/2018
MW-23S
6/17/19 Well
Abandoned
MW-24S
3/18/2008
MW-24S
8/26/2008
MW-24S
12/14/2009
Pesticide Method 8081B
(ug/L)
Aldrin
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
NA
-
-
-
alpha-BHC*
002
0.01
-
-
-
-
NA
-
-
-
beta-BHC*
002
0.01
-
-
-
-
NA
-
-
-
delta-BHC
002
N/A
-
-
-
-
NA
-
-
-
gamma-BHC (Lindane)*
003
0.2
-
-
-
-
NA
-
-
-
alpha-Chlordane
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
NA
-
-
-
gamma-Chlordane*
0.1
0.1
-
-
-
-
NA
-
-
-
4,4-DDD
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
NA
-
-
-
4,4-DDE
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
NA
-
-
-
4,4-DDT
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
NA
-
-
-
Dieldrin*
0.002
0.1
-
-
-
-
NA
-
-
-
Endosulfan I
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
NA
-
-
-
Endosulfan II
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
NA
-
-
-
Endosulfan sulfate
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
NA
-
-
-
Endrin
2.0
N/A
-
-
-
-
NA
-
-
-
Endrin aldehyde
2.0
N/A
-
-
-
-
NA
-
-
-
Endrin ketone
2.0
N/A
-
-
-
-
NA
-
-
-
Heptachlor
0.008
N/A
-
-
-
-
NA
-
-
-
Heptachlor epoxide*
0.004
0.05
-
-
-
-
NA
-
-
-
Methoxychlor
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
NA
-
-
-
Toxaphene
0.03
N/A
-
-
-
-
NA
-
-
-
Notes:
A = Sample containers received by laboratory broken, no sample analysis
NCAC 2L = NorthCarolina Administrative Code groundwater standard
N/A = No criteria available
- = Not detected above the practical quantitation limit (PQL)
ug/L = micrograms per liter
Bold indicates results exceed ROD remediation level
Shaded cells indicate detection above NCAC 2L
P = The relative percent difference (RPD) between two GC columns exceeds 40%
* = Record of Decision (ROD) identified compound
Page 13
-------
Table 3
OU-1 Historical Groundwater Analytical Results
FCX-Statesville Site
ROD
NCAC 2L
Remediation
MW-24S
MW-24S A
MW-24S
MW-24S
MW-24S
MW-24S
MW-24S
MW-24S
CONSTITUENT
(ug/L)
Level (ug/L)
7/7/2010
12/14/2010
8/30/2011
5/30/2012
12/4/2012
10/29/2013
11/12/2014
2/29/2016
Pesticide Method 8081B
(ug/L)
Aldrin
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
alpha-BHC*
002
0.01
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
beta-BHC*
002
0.01
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
delta-BHC
002
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
gamma-BHC (Lindane)*
003
0.2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
alpha-Chlordane
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
gamma-Chlordane*
0.1
0.1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDD
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDE
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDT
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Dieldrin*
0.002
0.1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endosulfan I
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endosulfan II
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endosulfan sulfate
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin
2.0
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin aldehyde
2.0
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin ketone
2.0
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Heptachlor
0.008
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Heptachlor epoxide*
0.004
0.05
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Methoxychlor
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Toxaphene
0.03
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Notes:
A = Sample containers received by laboratory broken, no sample analysis
NCAC 2L = NorthCarolina Administrative Code groundwater standard
N/A = No criteria available
- = Not detected above the practical quantitation limit (PQL)
ug/L = micrograms per liter
Bold indicates results exceed ROD remediation level
Shaded cells indicate detection above NCAC 2L
P = The relative percent difference (RPD) between two GC columns exceeds 40%
* = Record of Decision (ROD) identified compound
Page 14
-------
Table 3
OU-1 Historical Groundwater Analytical Results
FCX-Statesville Site
CONSTITUENT
NCAC 2L
(ug/L)
ROD
Remediation
Level (ug/L)
MW-24S
5/17/2017
MW-24S
5/1/2018
MW-24S
6/17/2019
MW-24S
10/19/2020
MW-24S Dup
10/19/2020
MW-27S
3/18/2008
MW-27S
8/26/2008
MW-27S
12/14/2009
Pesticide Method 8081B
(ug/L)
Aldrin
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
alpha-BHC*
002
0.01
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
beta-BHC*
002
0.01
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
delta-BHC
002
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
gamma-BHC (Lindane)*
003
0.2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
alpha-Chlordane
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
gamma-Chlordane*
0.1
0.1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDD
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDE
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDT
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Dieldrin*
0.002
0.1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endosulfan I
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endosulfan II
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endosulfan sulfate
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin
2.0
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin aldehyde
2.0
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin ketone
2.0
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Heptachlor
0.008
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Heptachlor epoxide*
0.004
0.05
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Methoxychlor
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Toxaphene
0.03
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Notes:
A = Sample containers received by laboratory broken, no sample analysis
NCAC 2L = NorthCarolina Administrative Code groundwater standard
N/A = No criteria available
- = Not detected above the practical quantitation limit (PQL)
ug/L = micrograms per liter
Bold indicates results exceed ROD remediation level
Shaded cells indicate detection above NCAC 2L
P = The relative percent difference (RPD) between two GC columns exceeds 40%
* = Record of Decision (ROD) identified compound
Page 15
-------
Table 3
OU-1 Historical Groundwater Analytical Results
FCX-Statesville Site
ROD
NCAC 2L
Remediation
MW-27S
MW-27S
MW-27S
MW-27S
MW-27S
MW-27S
MW-27S
MW-27S
CONSTITUENT
(ug/L)
Level (ug/L)
7/7/2010
12/14/2010
8/30/2011
5/30/2012
12/4/2012
10/29/2013
11/12/2014
2/29/2016
Pesticide Method 8081B
(ug/L)
Aldrin
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
alpha-BHC*
002
0.01
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
beta-BHC*
002
0.01
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
delta-BHC
002
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
gamma-BHC (Lindane)*
003
0.2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
alpha-Chlordane
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
gamma-Chlordane*
0.1
0.1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDD
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDE
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDT
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Dieldrin*
0.002
0.1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endosulfan I
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endosulfan II
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endosulfan sulfate
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin
2.0
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin aldehyde
2.0
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin ketone
2.0
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Heptachlor
0.008
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Heptachlor epoxide*
0.004
0.05
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Methoxychlor
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Toxaphene
0.03
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Notes:
A = Sample containers received by laboratory broken, no sample analysis
NCAC 2L = NorthCarolina Administrative Code groundwater standard
N/A = No criteria available
- = Not detected above the practical quantitation limit (PQL)
ug/L = micrograms per liter
Bold indicates results exceed ROD remediation level
Shaded cells indicate detection above NCAC 2L
P = The relative percent difference (RPD) between two GC columns exceeds 40%
* = Record of Decision (ROD) identified compound
Page 16
-------
Table 3
OU-1 Historical Groundwater Analytical Results
FCX-Statesville Site
CONSTITUENT
NCAC 2L
(ug/L)
ROD
Remediation
Level (ug/L)
MW-27S
5/17/2017
MW-27S
5/1/2018
MW-27S
6/17/19 Well
Abandoned
MW-42I
3/18/2008
MW-42I Dup
3/18/2008
MW-42I
8/26/2008
MW-42I Dup
8/26/2008
MW-42I
12/14/2009
Pesticide Method 8081B
(ug/L)
Aldrin
N/A
N/A
-
-
NA
-
-
-
-
-
alpha-BHC*
002
0.01
-
-
NA
-
-
-
-
-
beta-BHC*
002
0.01
0.055P
-
NA
-
-
-
-
-
delta-BHC
002
N/A
-
-
NA
-
-
-
-
-
gamma-BHC (Lindane)*
003
0.2
-
-
NA
-
-
-
-
-
alpha-Chlordane
0.1
N/A
-
-
NA
-
-
-
-
-
gamma-Chlordane*
0.1
0.1
-
-
NA
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDD
0.1
N/A
-
-
NA
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDE
N/A
N/A
-
-
NA
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDT
0.1
N/A
-
-
NA
-
-
-
-
-
Dieldrin*
0.002
0.1
-
-
NA
-
-
-
-
-
Endosulfan I
40
N/A
-
-
NA
-
-
-
-
-
Endosulfan II
40
N/A
-
-
NA
-
-
-
-
-
Endosulfan sulfate
N/A
N/A
-
-
NA
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin
2.0
N/A
-
-
NA
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin aldehyde
2.0
N/A
-
-
NA
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin ketone
2.0
N/A
-
-
NA
-
-
-
-
-
Heptachlor
0.008
N/A
-
-
NA
-
-
-
-
-
Heptachlor epoxide*
0.004
0.05
-
-
NA
-
-
-
-
-
Methoxychlor
40
N/A
-
-
NA
-
-
-
-
-
Toxaphene
0.03
N/A
-
-
NA
-
-
-
-
-
Notes:
A = Sample containers received by laboratory broken, no sample analysis
NCAC 2L = NorthCarolina Administrative Code groundwater standard
N/A = No criteria available
- = Not detected above the practical quantitation limit (PQL)
ug/L = micrograms per liter
Bold indicates results exceed ROD remediation level
Shaded cells indicate detection above NCAC 2L
P = The relative percent difference (RPD) between two GC columns exceeds 40%
* = Record of Decision (ROD) identified compound
Page 17
-------
Table 3
OU-1 Historical Groundwater Analytical Results
FCX-Statesville Site
ROD
NCAC 2L
Remediation
MW-42I Dup
MW-42I
MW-42I Dup
MW-42I
MW-42I Dup
MW-42I
MW-42I Dup
MW-42I
CONSTITUENT
(ug/L)
Level (ug/L)
12/14/2009
7/7/2010
7/7/2010
12/14/2010
12/14/2010
8/30/2011
8/30/2011
5/30/2012
Pesticide Method 8081B
(ug/L)
Aldrin
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
alpha-BHC*
002
0.01
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
beta-BHC*
002
0.01
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
delta-BHC
002
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
gamma-BHC (Lindane)*
003
0.2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
alpha-Chlordane
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
gamma-Chlordane*
0.1
0.1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDD
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDE
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDT
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Dieldrin*
0.002
0.1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endosulfan I
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endosulfan II
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endosulfan sulfate
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin
2.0
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin aldehyde
2.0
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin ketone
2.0
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Heptachlor
0.008
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Heptachlor epoxide*
0.004
0.05
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Methoxychlor
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Toxaphene
0.03
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Notes:
A = Sample containers received by laboratory broken, no sample analysis
NCAC 2L = NorthCarolina Administrative Code groundwater standard
N/A = No criteria available
- = Not detected above the practical quantitation limit (PQL)
ug/L = micrograms per liter
Bold indicates results exceed ROD remediation level
Shaded cells indicate detection above NCAC 2L
P = The relative percent difference (RPD) between two GC columns exceeds 40%
* = Record of Decision (ROD) identified compound
Page 18
-------
Table 3
OU-1 Historical Groundwater Analytical Results
FCX-Statesville Site
CONSTITUENT
NCAC 2L
(ug/L)
ROD
Remediation
Level (ug/L)
MW-42I Dup
5/30/2012
MW-42I
12/4/2012
MW-42I Dup
12/4/2012
MW-42I
10/29/2013
MW-42I Dup
10/29/2013
MW-42I Dup
11/12/2014
MW-42I
2/29/2016
MW-42I
5/17/2017
Pesticide Method 8081B
(ug/L)
Aldrin
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
alpha-BHC*
002
0.01
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
beta-BHC*
002
0.01
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
delta-BHC
002
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
gamma-BHC (Lindane)*
003
0.2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
alpha-Chlordane
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
gamma-Chlordane*
0.1
0.1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDD
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDE
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,4-DDT
0.1
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Dieldrin*
0.002
0.1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endosulfan I
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endosulfan II
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endosulfan sulfate
N/A
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin
2.0
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin aldehyde
2.0
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Endrin ketone
2.0
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Heptachlor
0.008
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Heptachlor epoxide*
0.004
0.05
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Methoxychlor
40
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Toxaphene
0.03
N/A
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Notes:
A = Sample containers received by laboratory broken, no sample analysis
NCAC 2L = NorthCarolina Administrative Code groundwater standard
N/A = No criteria available
- = Not detected above the practical quantitation limit (PQL)
ug/L = micrograms per liter
Bold indicates results exceed ROD remediation level
Shaded cells indicate detection above NCAC 2L
P = The relative percent difference (RPD) between two GC columns exceeds 40%
* = Record of Decision (ROD) identified compound
Page 19
-------
Table 3
OU-1 Historical Groundwater Analytical Results
FCX-Statesville Site
CONSTITUENT
NCAC 2L
(ug/L)
ROD
Remediation
Level (ug/L)
MW-42I
5/1/2018
MW-42I
6/17/2019
MW-42I
10/19/2020
Pesticide Method 8081B
(ug/L)
Aldrin
N/A
N/A
-
-
N/A
alpha-BHC*
002
0.01
-
-
N/A
beta-BHC*
002
0.01
-
-
N/A
delta-BHC
002
N/A
-
-
N/A
gamma-BHC (Lindane)*
003
0.2
-
-
N/A
alpha-Chlordane
0.1
N/A
-
-
N/A
gamma-Chlordane*
0.1
0.1
-
-
N/A
4,4-DDD
0.1
N/A
-
-
N/A
4,4-DDE
N/A
N/A
-
-
N/A
4,4-DDT
0.1
N/A
-
-
N/A
Dieldrin*
0.002
0.1
-
-
N/A
Endosulfan I
40
N/A
-
-
N/A
Endosulfan II
40
N/A
-
-
N/A
Endosulfan sulfate
N/A
N/A
-
-
N/A
Endrin
2.0
N/A
-
-
N/A
Endrin aldehyde
2.0
N/A
-
-
N/A
Endrin ketone
2.0
N/A
-
-
N/A
Heptachlor
0.008
N/A
-
-
N/A
Heptachlor epoxide*
0.004
0.05
-
-
N/A
Methoxychlor
40
N/A
-
-
N/A
Toxaphene
0.03
N/A
-
-
N/A
Notes:
A = Sample containers received by laboratory broken, no sample analysis
NCAC 2L = NorthCarolina Administrative Code groundwater standard
N/A = No criteria available
- = Not detected above the practical quantitation limit (PQL)
ug/L = micrograms per liter
Bold indicates results exceed ROD remediation level
Shaded cells indicate detection above NCAC 2L
P = The relative percent difference (RPD) between two GC columns exceeds 40%
* = Record of Decision (ROD) identified compound
Page 20
-------
APPENDIX A
Site Health arid Safety Plan
*The remainder of the report is not included in this FYR due to the si/e of the
data. A full cop} of iliis report is available through the I P A
FCX-Statesville Superfund Site
NCD 095 458 527
NCDENR Superfund Section
December 2020
-------
APPENDIX I
OIJ3 2020 ANNUAL REMEDI AL ACTION REPORT
1-1
-------
Annual Remedial Action
Progress Report - 2019
FCX (Statesville) Superfund Site (OU3)
Statesville, North Carolina
AECOM Project Number: 60611584
June 2020
-------
Annual Remedial Action Report-2019
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY VI
1. INTRODUCTION 1-1
1.1 OU3 Location 1-1
1.2 OU3 Remedy Background 1-1
1.3 Project Team 1-2
1.4 Report Organization 1-2
2. SITE GEOLOGY, HYDROGEOLOGY, AND CSM SUMMARY 2-1
2.1 Geology 2-1
2.2 Hydrogeology 2-1
2.2.1 Groundwater Occurrence 2-1
2.2.2 Groundwater Flow 2-1
2.3 Conceptual Site Model (Summary) 2-2
3. GROUNDWATER MONITORING 3-1
3.1 Groundwater Sampling Procedures and Results 3-1
3.1.1 Water Level Gauging 3-1
3.1.2 Groundwater Sampling 3-1
3.1.3 Laboratory Analytical Methods 3-2
3.2 Groundwater VOC Analytical Results Discussion 3-2
3.2.1 Source Area Saprolite Wells 3-3
3.2.2 North Area Saprolite and Transition Zone Wells 3-3
3.2.3 South Area Saprolite and Transition Zone Wells 3-4
3.2.4 Bedrock Wells 3-4
3.2.5 Cross-Section Profile 3-5
3.2.6 Row N-1 Well Results 3-5
4. SYSTEM REMEDIATION 4-1
4.1 Historical System Operation Summary 4-1
4.2 Northern AS System Installation and Design 4-1
5. OTHER 2019 ACTIVITIES 5-1
5.1 Surface Water and Porewater Sampling 5-1
5.1.1 Surface Water Sampling Activities 5-1
5.1.2 Surface Water Analytical Results 5-1
5.1.3 Porewater Sampling Activities 5-2
5.1.4 Porewater Analytical Results 5-2
6. 2020 PLANNED ACTIVITIES 6-1
6.1 Groundwater Monitoring 6-1
6.2 Surface Water 6-1
6.3 Northern AS System Well Installation 6-1
7. REFERENCES 7-1
March 2020
AECOM
ii
-------
Annual Remedial Action Report-2019
Tables
Table 2-1 OU3 Monitoring and Remediation Well Construction Summary
Table 2-2a April 2019 Groundwater Elevation Data
Table 2-2b October 2019 Groundwater Elevation Data
Table 3-1 Summary of Chemical Analyses and Analytical Method References for Groundwater
Sampling
Table 3-2 Groundwater Volatile Organic Compound Analytical Results and Natural Attenuation
Parameter Field Measurements - 2019
Table 3-3 Groundwater Volatile Organic Compound Analytical Results - Row N-1 Wells
Figures
Figure 1-1 Site Location Map
Figure 1-2 FCX Superfund Site Operable Units
Figure 2-1 Cross-Section A-A'
Figure 2-2 Monitoring and Remediation Well Locations (Part 1 of 2)
Figure 2-3 Monitoring and Remediation Well Locations (Part 2 of 2)
Figure 2-4a Groundwater Contour Map, April 2019, Saprolite Zone
Figure 2-4b Groundwater Contour Map, October 2019, Saprolite Zone
Figure 2-5a Groundwater Contour Map, April 2019, Transition Zone
Figure 2-5b Groundwater Contour Map, October 2019, Transition Zone
Figure 2-6a Groundwater Contour Map, April 2019, Bedrock Zone
Figure 2-6b Groundwater Contour Map, October 2019, Bedrock Zone
Figure 3-1 PCE Concentrations in Groundwater, Saprolite Wells, April - October 2019
Figure 3-2 PCE Concentrations in Groundwater, Transition Zone Wells, April - October 2019
Figure 3-3 PCE Concentrations in Groundwater, Bedrock Wells, April - October 2019
Figure 3-4 Average Source Area Monitoring Well PCE Concentrations (2000 to 2019)
Figure 3-5 Cross-Section A-A, PCE Concentrations in Groundwater
Figure 3-6 PCE Concentrations in Groundwater, Transition and Saprolite Wells,
Source Area - 2007-2008
Figure 3-7 PCE Concentrations in Groundwater, Transition and Saprolite Wells,
Source Area - 2019
Appendices
Appendix A Historical Groundwater Elevation Data
Appendix B Field Data Sheets
Appendix C Waste Disposal Manifests
Appendix D Laboratory Analytical Reports
Appendix E Historical Groundwater Volatile Organic Compound Analytical Results
Appendix F Northern Air Sparge System Design
Appendix G Surface Water and Porewater Figures and Data Tables
March 2020
AECOM
-------
Annual Remedial Action Report-2019
Acronyms
mq/l
11DCA
12DCA
12DCP
112TCA
AECOM
ANA
AS
AS/SVE
B&C
bgs
BDCM
cDCE
COC
CSM
CT
DO
DPT
DWR
EPNG
ESD
FCX
FS
IDW
Kg
MDL
mg/L
MNA
NC 2B standard
NC 2L standard
NCAC 15A
NCDEQ
ORP
OU3
PCE
PPE
PRB
PWR
QAPP
QA/QC
QC
ROD
SGS
March 2020
Micrograms per Liter
1.1 dichloroethane
1.2 dichloroethane
1,2 dichloropropane
1,1,2 trichloroethane
AECOM Technical Services of North Carolina, Inc.
Accelerated Natural Attenuation
Air Sparge
Air Sparging and Soil Vapor Extraction
Brown and Caldwell
Below Ground Surface
Bromodichloromethane
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Constituent of Concern
Conceptual Site Model
Carbon Tetrachloride
Dissolved Oxygen
Direct Push Technology
Division of Water Resources
El Paso Natural Gas
Explanation of Significant Difference
Farmers Cooperative Exchange
Feasibility Study
Investigation-derived Waste
Kilograms
Method Detection Limit
Milligrams per liter
Monitored Natural Attenuation
North Carolina Surface Water Quality Standard
North Carolina Groundwater Quality Standard
North Carolina Administrative Code Title 15A
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Oxidation-Reduction Potential
Operable Unit 3
Tetrachloroethene
Personal Protective Equipment
Permeable Reactive Barrier
Partially Weathered Rock
Quality Assurance Project Plan
Quality Assurance/Quality Control
Quality Control
Record of Decision
SGS North America Inc.
AECOM
iv
-------
Annual Remedial Action Report-2019
Acronyms (Continued)
SM Standard Method
SVE Soil Vapor Extraction
TCE Trichloroethene
TOC Total Organic Carbon
TSS Total Suspended Solids
USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
VOC Volatile Organic Compound
ZVI Zero-valent Iron
March 2020
AECOM
V
-------
Annual Remedial Action Report-2019
Executive Summary
Introduction and Background
This Annual Remedial Action Progress Report presents a summary of work conducted for Operable Unit
Three (OU3) at the Farmers Cooperative Exchange (FCX) - Statesville Superfund Site (Site) between
January 2019 and December 2019. OU3 consists of impacts associated with releases of volatile organic
compounds (VOCs), predominantly tetrachloroethene (PCE) and daughter products of degradation, from
the former Burlington Industries Textile Mill at 201 Phoenix Street, Statesville, North Carolina.
Historic operations resulted in PCE impacts to soil and groundwater in the building area. A groundwater
plume containing dissolved concentrations of PCE diverges to the north and south of the building. The
primary plume component travels north toward a tributary of Gregory Creek (Northern Drainage Feature)
where it has historically discharged dissolved PCE in excess of the NCAC 15A Subsection 02B.0200
(NC 2B standard). To the south, traces of PCE have also reached a tributary of Third Creek, but never in
exceedance of the NC 2B standard. Additionally, impacted groundwater surfaces in a marsh referred to as
the overland seep area, located in the woods north of the developed area. Based on previous
investigations, most of the PCE mass surfacing from the overland seep is volatilized as the water flows
above ground, eventually discharging into the Northern Drainage Feature.
The remedy prescribed in the Record of Decision (ROD) for OU3 includes groundwater plume monitored
natural attenuation (MNA) and active source control by means of air sparging and soil vapor extraction
(AS/SVE). An AS/SVE system was installed in 2001, with subsequent expansions in 2003, 2009, and
2013. The system has remained in operation up to July 2018, were it has temporarily been shut down to
monitor rebound. An Explanation of Significant Difference (ESD) for OU3 was promulgated on September
8, 2006 to add Accelerated Natural Attenuation (ANA) to the ongoing MNA and AS/SVE remedies at the
Site. An ANA injection was performed within the north area groundwater plume in 2007. A second ESD for
OU3 was promulgated on August 18, 2015, to incorporate injections of BOS-100® into the Site remedy.
The BOS-100® injections were conducted in order to form a permeable reactive barrier (PRB) designed
to remove PCE from groundwater prior to entering the Northern Drainage Feature. A pilot test and two
full-scale BOS-100® injections were completed in November 2013, November 2015, and May 2017,
respectively.
A source area investigation performed in 2011 indicated that, after approximately ten years of soil vapor
extraction (SVE) system operation, very little PCE mass remained in the vadose zone of the Site.
Similarly, air sparging operations appear to have contributed to decreasing PCE concentrations in source
area groundwater. Historical monitoring has also demonstrated decreases in the size and intensity of the
PCE plume in groundwater to the north and south of the source area. Finally, based on porewater and
surface water monitoring performed since 2015, the BOS-100® PRB appears to capture and treat the
majority of the PCE mass which would otherwise reach the Northern Drainage Feature surface water.
2019 Activities
The Annual Remedial Action Progress Report documents multiple investigation and remediation activities
performed at the Site in 2019, including groundwater sampling, AS/SVE system operation, surface water
sampling, and monitoring well abandonment. These activities are briefly summarized in the following sub-
sections.
Groundwater Monitoring Well Sampling
Groundwater level gauging and groundwater sampling were performed at the Site in April 2019 and
October 2019. Groundwater samples were analyzed for VOCs and field-analyzed natural attenuation
parameters. In general, groundwater sampling results continue to exhibit decreasing PCE concentrations
across the Site. Key conclusions based on 2019 monitoring results include the following:
March 2020
AECOM
vi
-------
Annual Remedial Action Report-2019
• The average source area monitoring well PCE concentration has decreased from a maximum of
12,295 micrograms per liter (fjg/L) in November 2000 to 1,647 in October 2012 to only 404 |jg/L in
October 2019.
• The dimensions of the plume to the south appear to be shrinking. Bedrock monitoring well PCE data
demonstrates a widespread decreasing trend on all sides of the building, and decreasing trends
have been noted along the edges of the north area plume. The reduction in the size and intensity of
the overall PCE plume is likely attributable to diffusion and dispersion following upgradient PCE
source depletion (i.e. source area AS/SVE operations).
• The highest PCE concentrations outside of the source area have historically been detected in
saprolite wells W-19s, MP-16, and MP-17 and transition zone wells W-30t, IW-4t, IW-5t, and IW-6t.
These wells are located near the centerline of the dissolved phase plume directly downgradient
(north) of the source area.
In addition to routine monitoring performed during 2018, a select set of nine (9) "Row N-1" wells were
sampled again in October 2019. The wells were installed in 2007 as potential injection wells, but were
never utilized for their intended purpose. However, the wells were sampled in December 2007 for VOC
analysis. The following conclusions were noted based on a comparison of 2007 and 2019 monitoring
results:
• Air sparging efforts have effectively reduced source area PCE. As may be expected, the source
reduction also appears to have resulted in a reduction of downgradient PCE concentrations in Row
N-1 wells.
• As of 2019, the highest PCE concentrations at the Site are present further downgradient between the
Row N-1 wells and the overland seep area near monitoring well W-30t (i.e., monitoring wells IW-6t
and W-19s). Given that even the highest concentrations within the facility building footprint are lower
than PCE concentrations in monitoring wells IW-6t and W-19s, re-starting of the existing system
would yield minimal benefits.
Source Area AS/SVE Operations
For the reasons described above, and with agency concurrence, source area AS/SVE system operations
were suspended on July 27th, 2018. Following a year of suspended source area AS/SVE system
operations, AECOM proposed the permanent shut down and dismantlement of the source area AS/SVE
system in a memo submitted to the agency. On July 31st, 2019, the agency approved the dismantlement
of the source area AS/SVE system. AECOM is currently evaluating the process to dismantle the AS/SVE
system and demolish the abandoned Burlington Industries structure.
Downgradient AS Planning and Installation
Installaton of a new air sparge system to improve PCE concentrations in the most impacted area of the
Site, currently located in the vicinity of wells IW-6t and W-19s. EPNG intends to install an air sparge
system in the vicinity of the elevated PCE concentrations remaining north of the source area.
Remediation of this area should cause a permanent decrease in the PCE conentrations at the seeps,
thereby reducing or eliminating the elevated concentrations entering the Northern Drainage.
Surface Water Sampling
Quarterly surface water sampling events have been performed since 2012 at the request the North
Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) Division of Water Resources (DWR). PCE
concentrations in the Northern Drainage Feature have exhibited consistent decreasing trends since the
November 2015 Phase 1 BOS-100® injection and May 2017 Phase 2 BOS-100® injection. However in
March 2019, PCE was detected above the NC 2B in several samping locations including sample locations
URS-SW-03 and URS-SW-F. PCE concentrations at these locations are prone to increases in winter
months, although the March 2019 concentrations represent the highest concentrations observed since
early 2016. PCE at these locations likely originates from PCE detected within overland groundwater
seepage, which collects and discharges into the Northern Drainage Feature directly upstream of the
URS-SW-03 sampling location. Treatment of these sources is planned by expanding the Air Sparge
March 2020
AECOM
vii
-------
Annual Remedial Action Report-2019
remedy in the vicinity of the N-1 wells. Effective treatment would be expected to permenantly minimize or
eliminate PCE concentrations at the URS-SW-03 and URS-SW-F sampling locations.
Proposed 2020 Activities
The annual monitoring and operations activities proposed for 2019 include several modifications to the
scope of work implemented during recent years. Descriptions of the 2019 activities are included in
Section 5.4 of the report along with detailed justifications for the proposed scope modifications. A
summary of the proposed activities is provided as follows:
• Groundwater monitoring will continue semi-annually, generally consistent with the 2007 ANA Work
Plan. However, AECOM proposes discontinuing analysis of natural attenuation parameters chloride,
nitrate, sulfate, alkalinity, and total organic carbon (TOC). Past reviews of chloride, nitrate, sulfate,
alkalinity, and TOC data have provided fairly minimal insight into site biodegradation and further data
is unnecessary. Additionally, anaerobic reductive dechlorination appears to play a minor role in
attenuation in comparison with physical mechanisms associated with the groundwater surfacing in
the marsh area and dispersion and diffusion following source depletion.
• Surface water will continue to be sampled during 2019 in accordance with NCDEQ DWR's request
for quarterly monitoring and to further evaluate the effect of the BOS-100® injections. The scope of
sampling will be similiarto 2018, five (5) sampling locations will continue to be collected quarterly
with an additional four (4) sampling locations to be collected annually.
• AECOM will start installation of 48 new air sparge wells (AW-1 through AW-48) in the vicinity of the
elevated PCE concentrations remaining north of the source area. Remediation of this area should
cause a permanent decrease in the PCE conentrations at the seeps, thereby reducing or eliminating
the elevated concentrations entering the Northern Drainage.
March 2020
AECOM
viii
-------
Annual Remedial Action Report-2019
1. Introduction
This Annual Remedial Action Progress Report presents a summary of work conducted for Operable Unit
Three (OU3) at the Farmers Cooperative Exchange (FCX) - Statesville Superfund Site (Site) between
January 2019 and December 2019.
1.1 OU3 Location
The FCX Superfund Site is located at the corner of West Front Street and Phoenix Street in Statesville,
North Carolina as identified on Figure 1-1. Operable Units OU1 and OU2 are associated with pesticide
contamination at the former FCX Site, and are not directly discussed in this report. These two operable
units are being addressed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Region IV and
are not the responsibility of El Paso Natural Gas Company (EPNG). OU3 consists of impacts associated
with releases of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), predominantly tetrachloroethene (PCE), from the
former Burlington Industries Textile Site at 201 Phoenix Street, shown on Figure 1-2. According to the
Record of Decision (ROD), OU3 consists of the chlorinated VOCs in soil and groundwater beneath the
Site and in groundwater north and south of the Site (USEPA, September 1996). OU3 is being addressed
by EPNG.
1.2 OU3 Remedy Background
The remedy prescribed in the ROD for OU3 includes groundwater plume monitored natural attenuation
(MNA) and active source control by means of air sparging and soil vapor extraction (AS/SVE). The source
area AS/SVE system was installed within and adjacent to the former Burlington Industries facility building
(facility building) in two phases between 2001 and 2003 and was expanded in 2009 and 2013. However,
on July 27th, 2018, the AS/SVE System was shut down due to diminishing rate of PCE mass removal and
due to the highest PCE concentrations at the Site being present further downgradient between the
Row N-1 wells and the overland seep area near monitoring well W-30t. Following a year of suspended
source area AS/SVE system operations, AECOM proposed the permanent shut down and dismantlement
of the source area AS/SVE system in a memo submitted to the agency. On July 31st, 2019, the agency
approved the dismantlement of the source area AS/SVE system. As discussed further in Section 4, a
new AS system down gradient of the source area is currently being designed and installed to fulfill the
remediation needs for the site.
An Explanation of Significant Difference (ESD) for OU3 was promulgated on September 8, 2006 (USEPA,
September 2006). The ESD added Accelerated Natural Attenuation (ANA) to the ongoing MNA and
AS/SVE remedies at the Site. The Phase I design completed by Brown and Caldwell (B & C) for
implementation of ANA was issued in March 2007 (B & C, March 2007). The design document included
an updated groundwater monitoring plan which was implemented in calendar year 2007. The updated
groundwater monitoring plan allows for future modification including the adjustment of monitoring wells,
sample frequency, and analysis from event to event, as appropriate to monitor the stability of the
constituent of concern (COC) plume.
The MNA strategy and subsequent ANA injections were primarily intended to address the COC plume
extending north of the facility building towards an unnamed tributary to Gregory Creek referred to as the
Northern Drainage Feature. Based on surface water assessments performed between 2009 and 2012, a
pilot test BOS-100® injection event was performed in November 2013 to address the COC plume in the
vicinity of the Northern Drainage Feature. The BOS-100® material, a combination of activated carbon and
zero-valent iron (ZVI), was injected at a slight angle in order to form a subsurface permeable reactive
barrier (PRB) adjacent to and below the creek bed. Based on successful pilot test results, a second ESD
for OU3 was promulgated on August 18, 2015, to incorporate a proposed full-scale injected BOS-100®
PRB into the Site remedy (USEPA, August 2015). Two phases of full-scale PRB injections were
completed in November 2015 and May 2017.
March 2020
AECOM
1-1
-------
Annual Remedial Action Report-2019
1.3 Project Team
Field work conducted for this project in 2019 was implemented by AECOM Technical Services of North
Carolina, Inc. (AECOM) on behalf of EPNG. This report has been generated by AECOM. The intended
audience is the USEPA and the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ).
1.4 Report Organization
In addition to this Introduction (Section 1), this report is organized into the following four (4) sections:
• Section 2 presents Site background information, including descriptions of Site geology and
hydrogeology and a summary of the conceptual site model (CSM).
• Section 3 presents the 2019 groundwater monitoring data.
• Section 4 presents a summary of past and future AS/SVE system operations.
• Section 5 describes other tasks conducted during 2019 and planned tasks for 2020.
• Section 6 lists references cited.
Tables, Figures, and Appendices are included following Section 6.
March 2020
AECOM
1-2
-------
Annual Remedial Action Report-2019
2. Site Geology, Hydrogeology, and CSM Summary
2.1 Geology
The Site is underlain by residual soils and saprolite formed through the physical and chemical weathering
of the parent bedrock, which has been classified as gneiss and schist. Saprolite is defined as weathered
bedrock that is in-situ and mimics the fabric of its parent material. The Site lithology and hydrogeology are
extensively characterized in the CSM (URS, November 2008). For the purposes of this discussion, Site
soils are referenced as saprolite and will refer to the interval beginning at the ground surface and
extending to the top of partially weathered rock (PWR). The saprolite consists of reddish brown clay
interspersed with sandy silts and silty sands. The contact with the underlying PWR appears gradational in
the majority of the boring locations at the Site. PWR is compositionally the same as the unconsolidated
saprolite, but contains more competent materials (i.e. rock fragments). The PWR interval, also referred to
as the transition zone, is estimated based on auger refusal, the presence of rock fragments in macro-core
or auger cuttings, and rock fragments that are too fractured to be cored. The transition zone gradation
continues downward to less fractured rock and then competent bedrock.
The thickness of saprolite varies significantly across the Site, with observations ranging from 16 feet at
the location of monitoring well W-31, to greater than 115 feet in a bedrock trough indicated north of the
facility building and south of the Northern Drainage Feature. The transition zone is generally comprised of
greenish gray to light brown gravelly sand with traces of silt and larger rock fragments. Generally in the
Piedmont, the transition zone will be the most transmissive zone for groundwater. A conceptual geologic
cross-section illustrating the various geologic zones is presented as Figure 2-1.
2.2 Hydrogeology
2.2.1 Groundwater Occurrence
Consistent with the typical groundwater systems of the Piedmont, the water bearing units at the Site form
an upper groundwater system that includes saprolite, transition zone, and the underlying fractured gneiss
and schist which generally becomes more competent with depth. The vast majority of monitoring wells are
screened in the geologic units that comprise the upper groundwater system (i.e., the saprolite, transition
zone, and intermediate bedrock). However, a few wells extend over 100 feet into bedrock and monitor
fractures that are more likely part of the lower groundwater system (i.e., monitoring wells W-20d, W-28d,
and W-33d). Table 2-1 presents a summary of construction details for wells at the Site. Figure 2-2 and
Figure 2-3 illustrate monitoring well locations for the various units.
Depth to groundwater was measured in April and October 2019 as is presented in Tables 2-2a and 2-2b,
respectively. The estimated water table depth ranges from less than 1 foot below ground surface (bgs)
near the surface water drainages north and south of the Site (e.g., monitoring well W-20s) to greater than
40 feet bgs (e.g., monitoring well W-9s) based on measurements of saprolite and transition zone
monitoring wells near the facility building. Groundwater occurs at the greatest depths in the saprolite of
this area due partially to the facility building being located at a topographic high. The deeper water table is
also due to the limited infiltration that occurs as a result of impermeable surfaces, which cover a large
area, and the storm water collection system, which routes precipitation away from the building.
Hydrostatic head in the bedrock zone has been observed to vary widely, ranging from head elevations
which create artesian conditions at monitoring well W-29i to elevations more than 45 feet bgs at
monitoring well W-28d.
2.2.2 Groundwater Flow
Precipitation enters the Site groundwater systems by percolating downward to the water table (i.e.,
phreatic surface) within the saprolite through unpaved areas, cracks in pavement and potentially through
March 2020
AECOM
2-1
-------
Annual Remedial Action Report-2019
leaks in the storm water and sanitary sewer systems. This recharge sustains the lateral flow of
groundwater toward discharge zones manifested as seeps or streams.
The water table in the saprolite and transition zones at the Site generally mimics the overlying
topography. The general direction of lateral groundwater flow in the upper saprolite beneath the facility
has historically been inferred as northward toward the Northern Drainage Feature, where groundwater
discharges to the ground surface. Recent investigations of a marsh area located between the facility and
the Northern Drainage Feature have also documented significant groundwater discharges in this area. An
investigation of the surficial marsh and downstream channelized flow, referred to collectively as the
overland seep, was completed in 2017 and is discussed in Annual Remedial Action Progress Report-
2017 (AECOM, April 2018).
South of the facility, the general direction of lateral groundwater flow in the saprolite has historically been
inferred as southward toward an intermittent tributary of Third Creek (Southern Drainage Feature).
Available potentiometric surface data from bedrock wells at the Site indicate the saprolite, transition zone,
and bedrock are interconnected hydrogeologic units. Lateral groundwater flow in bedrock has historically
been inferred as toward the north and south (i.e., towards Gregory Creek and Third Creek, respectively)
based on monitoring well groundwater elevation data.
2.3 Conceptual Site Model (Summary)
The following summarizes major components of the CSM for the Site, including a general description of
suspected PCE fate and transport. A more detailed discussion of suspected PCE fate and transport at the
Site in the context of specific COC monitoring data, including 2019 and historical groundwater sampling
results is presented in Section 3.
Releases of PCE and other chlorinated VOCs are inferred to have occurred within and surrounding the
facility building during a period of time when an active dry cleaning process was part of textile
manufacturing activities (i.e., during the period between approximately 1961 and 1975). Although several
other chlorinated VOCs have been detected, Site investigation and remediation efforts have focused on
PCE due to its predominance. In addition, it is understood that a majority of the other chlorinated VOC
concentrations detected, including concentrations of trichloroethene (TCE), cis 1,2-dichloroethene
(cDCE), and vinyl chloride, have resulted from subsurface chemical and biological degradation of PCE.
The releases migrated downward through the soil profile, with vadose zone soil impacts generally limited
to the immediate vicinity of the facility building. During the Remedial Investigation (Rl), published in 1996
by Aquaterra, Inc. (Aquaterra, July 1996), elevated concentrations of PCE and TCE were detected in the
soils and groundwater in the saprolite zone, with groundwater PCE concentrations in the major suspected
source areas exceeding 10,000 micrograms per liter (fjg/L).
Once Burlington Industries operations ceased, the addition of source material into the vadose zone
ceased and downward vertical hydraulic driving heads were diminished. The vertical mobility of PCE at
the Site was likely exacerbated by the low organic carbon content in the saprolite, which limits retardation
(sorption), as well as vertical profile heterogeneities in shallow saprolitic soils. Conversely, impermeable
surfaces in the source area have diminished the downward PCE flux that would typically be induced by
storm water infiltration. A source area investigation performed in 2011 indicated that, after approximately
ten (10) years of soil vapor extraction (SVE) system operation, very little PCE mass remained in the
vadose zone of the Site, further limiting the downward migration of PCE from soil to groundwater in recent
years. A remedial system expansion completed in 2013 was intended to improve mass removal in the few
areas where PCE was detected in the vadose zone, while also enhancing groundwater treatment through
expanded air sparging operations.
The historical releases of PCE and other chlorinated VOCs and dissolution of non-aqueous phase PCE
has resulted in the development of a dissolved groundwater plume that has spread to the north and south
of the release areas. Vertical hydraulic gradients in groundwater are mainly downward within the source
area, facilitating the migration of dissolved phase impacts into the fractured bedrock. Despite these
gradients, the highest PCE concentrations in groundwater remain in the saprolite and transition zones.
March 2020
AECOM
2-2
-------
Annual Remedial Action Report-2019
Fracturing within the bedrock unit appears limited and decreases with depth. Groundwater monitoring
wells completed at a depth within the bedrock unit contain among the lowest concentrations of PCE at the
Site.
Groundwater flows towards surface water features to the north and south of the Site, which include
Gregory Creek, Third Creek, and associated tributaries. While vertical gradients are downward over the
majority of the Site, upward gradients are observed near two surface water features referred to as the
Northern and Southern Drainage Features, indicating groundwater from the Site is discharging to these
drainages. The overland seep area, located north of the facility and south of the Northern Drainage
Feature, has been previously understood to have formed due to groundwater discharges and stormwater
runoff. The overland seep investigation performed in 2017 has demonstrated that the resulting marsh
water contains elevated concentrations of PCE, which enters the marsh via groundwater discharges. The
highest concentrations of PCE within this groundwater discharge area were detected along the southern
edge of the overland seep marsh. Based on the investigation, most of the PCE mass discharging into the
overland seep is volatilized as the water flows north and eventually discharges into the Northern Drainage
Feature. The overland seep investigation procedures and results are discussed further in Annual
Remediation Progress Report-2017. As indicated in Annual Remediation Progress Report-2017, overland
seep investigation and historical groundwater sampling results suggest that the overland seep discharge
represents a local hydraulic barrier for elevated PCE concentrations (i.e., >500 |jg/L) in groundwater. PCE
concentrations generally fall within the 80 to 350 |jg/L range as groundwater travels north of the marsh
and approaches the Northern Drainage Feature.
Based on historical PCE analytical data for groundwater, surface water, and streambed sediment
porewater, as well as previous groundwater flow net analysis, the vast majority of PCE mass approaching
the northern property boundary is intercepted by vertical groundwater flow into the Northern Drainage
Feature. The BOS-100® PRB injections completed in November 2013, November 2015, and May 2017
were intended to capture and remediate PCE in-situ prior to reaching Northern Drainage Feature surface
water. Based on porewater and surface water monitoring performed since 2015, the PRB appears to
capture and treat the majority of the PCE mass which would otherwise reach the Northern Drainage
Feature surface water.
Soil gas has been sampled extensively on all sides of the facility building. Data collected from 2007 to
2010 demonstrate that vapor intrusion is not a concern for any structures in the vicinity of the facility
building. Assessment work at the N.B. Mills Elementary school in August and September of 2008
provided evidence that vapor intrusion is not occurring at the school. EPNG elected to perform two
rounds of follow-up monitoring at the school in June and December 2010 to verify previously assessed
conditions. In addition to samples collected near the school, samples were collected in areas north, west,
and south of the facility building. Data gathered during semi-annual vapor sampling in 2009 and 2010, in
combination with historical vapor sample data, demonstrate that concentrations of target compounds are
stable and that vapor intrusion does not pose an actionable risk at the Site. Investigation of the vapor
intrusion pathway has been completed and, absent a significant change in the disposition of the shallow
groundwater plume, no further assessment or monitoring is warranted. AECOM received agency
authorization in 2012 to abandon the majority of off-site soil gas monitoring points. Soil gas monitoring
points were abandoned in 2013 as documented in the Vapor Intrusion Abandonment Activities letter sent
to the USEPA (URS, December 2013).
March 2020
AECOM
2-3
-------
Annual Remedial Action Report-2019
3. Groundwater Monitoring
3.1 Groundwater Sampling Procedures and Results
Semi-annual groundwater monitoring is performed to provide data to assess the stability of the PCE
plume at the Site. Water level gauging and groundwater sampling were performed at the Site in April 2019
and October 2019. Groundwater samples were analyzed for VOCs and field-analyzed for natural
attenuation parameters. The following sections summarize 2019 water level gauging, groundwater
sampling, and laboratory analytical procedures and results.
3.1.1 Water Level Gauging
Depth-to-water was measured from the top-of-casing at 73 Site monitoring wells on April 23, 2019, and 72
Site monitoring wells on October 15, 2019, to determine hydraulic gradients and estimate groundwater
flow direction. The measurements were collected with an electronic water-level probe, which was
decontaminated using a Liquinox™ and distilled water solution followed by a rinse with distilled water
prior to inserting the probe into each well. The water-level measurements were converted to water-level
elevations using existing monitoring well top-of-casing elevation data. The water-level measurements
were used to prepare groundwater contour maps for the saprolite, transition, and intermediate bedrock
zones to estimate the groundwater flow direction at the Site at the time of sampling. Groundwater
contours for the saprolite zone, transition zone, and intermediate bedrock zone are shown on
Figures 2-4a, 2-5a, and 2-6a for April 2019 data and Figures 2-4b, 2-5b, and 2-6b for October 2019
data, respectively. Groundwater contours in each zone appear consistent with previous events, with the
inferred direction of groundwater flow slightly west of due north in the northern portion of the property and
slightly east of due south to the south of the facility building. Historical groundwater elevation data is
presented in Appendix A.
3.1.2 Groundwater Sampling
A total of 37 wells were sampled on April 24-25, 2019, and 38 wells were sampled on October 16-17,
2019. During the 2019 sampling events, most monitoring wells were sampled with passive sampling
techniques. In these cases, Geolnsight Hydrasleeve™ samplers were utilized. Procedures for installing
and sampling Hydrasleeve™ samplers were consistent with the project Quality Assurance Project Plan
QAPP (URS, April 2009). Hydrasleeves™ were installed a minimum of 48 hours prior to sampling.
Samples were collected directly from the Hydrasleeve™ into laboratory supplied containers.
Hydrasleeve™ sampling was not viable for monitoring well W-37t, which has historically exhibited
artesian conditions. Monitoring well W-37t was sampled on October 17, 2019, using a custom well-plug
attached to %-inch tubing. The monitoring well was allowed to purge through the tubing under natural
hydrostatic pressure.
Methods of field and laboratory parameter analyses are summarized in Table 3-1. Field measurements of
pH, temperature, specific conductivity, dissolved oxygen (DO), and oxidation-reduction potential (ORP)
were collected using a portable water quality multimeter calibrated in the field in accordance with the
manufacturer's instructions. Water quality parameters were collected from the Hydrasleeve™ after
sufficient volume was used to collect a groundwater sample. For the aforementioned artesian well, W-37t,
purge water was directed into a flow-through cell under natural hydrostatic pressure to allow periodic
water quality parameter measurements.
Water quality parameter readings were allowed to stabilize before being recorded. The 2019 field
measurements were recorded on electronic forms on a field tablet computer. Copies of the April 2019 and
October 2019 field data sheets are included with this report as Appendix B. Representative field
parameter measurements obtained at each well are summarized in Table 3-2.
At the time of collection, the groundwater sample containers were appropriately labeled and placed on ice
in a cooler which remained in the custody of a project representative until the samples were relinquished
March 2020
AECOM
3-1
-------
Annual Remedial Action Report-2019
to FedEx. Samples were shipped by FedEx to SGS North America Inc. (SGS) in Orlando, Florida for
analysis of VOCs. Shipments of samples to the laboratory included a completed chain-of-custody record
to maintain documentation of personnel that had control of the samples. VOC results are summarized in
Tables 3-2 and 3-3, respectively.
Non-dedicated sampling equipment was decontaminated using a Liquinox™ and distilled water solution
followed by a distilled water rinse consistent with the project QAPP (URS, April 2009). Waste generated
during the sampling event (i.e., purge water and decontamination water) and spent personal protective
equipment (PRE) was containerized for proper disposal in accordance with investigation-derived waste
(IDW) handling procedures identified in the QAPP (URS, April 2009).
3.1.3 Laboratory Analytical Methods
Groundwater samples collected during the 2019 sampling events were analyzed by SGS, a North
Carolina-certified laboratory. SGS has a quality control program in place that is comparable to the USEPA
Contract Laboratory Program, to ensure the reliability and usability of the analyses performed. Analytical
procedures for SGS are documented as standard operating procedures for the laboratory. These include
the minimum calibration, quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC), and analytical and reporting
requirements for each procedure. The groundwater samples collected and shipped to SGS were analyzed
for VOCs using USEPA Method 8260B (USEPA, December 1996).
AECOM validated analytical results from 2019 semiannual groundwater monitoring and quarterly surface
water sampling events at the Site. The data review was conducted in accordance with the Quality
Assurance Project Plan for FCX (Statesville) Superfund Site (OU3) (URS, April 2009). The data review
process was modeled after the Data Validation SOP for Organic Analysis (EPA Region 4, February 2016,
Revision 0.0) and Data Validation SOP for Contract Laboratory Program Inorganic Data by ICP-AES &
ICP-MS (Region 4, September 2, 2011, Version 2.0). Qualitative and quantitative limitations associated
with the analytical results were determined based on the results of specific quality control (QC) criteria.
Accuracy was determined from the review of spike recoveries and calibration data. An evaluation of
precision was based on field and laboratory duplicate results. Analytical data representativeness and
comparability were evaluated from the review of blank results (laboratory and trip blanks), and sample
preservation, storage, and holding time compliance. Sensitivity was evaluated by comparing reported
detection limits to project-specific reporting limit objectives. Sample results have been qualified based on
the results of the data review process. Areas of concern with respect to data quality are discussed in the
data validation checklists, which are provided in Appendix D. Qualified data are valid and usable for
their intended purpose. The completeness objective (90%) for each method, matrix, and sampling event
was met, as data points were not rejected. Criteria for acceptability of data were based upon available
site information, the QAPP, analytical method requirements, guidance documents, and professional
judgment.
3.2 Groundwater VOC Analytical Results Discussion
Groundwater sample analytical results for VOCs are summarized in Table 3-2. Appendix E presents
historical groundwater VOC results for the Site. Figures 3-1 through 3-3 present summaries of PCE
concentrations detected in 2019 in saprolite, transition zone, and bedrock monitoring wells, respectively.
Figure 3-4 presents a plot of the average source area monitoring well PCE concentration between June
2000 and October 2019. Sections 3.2.1 through 3.2.4 provide a narrative description of historical trends
and 2019 results for source area saprolite wells, north area saprolite and transition zone wells, south area
saprolite and transition zone wells, and bedrock wells, respectively. The primary COC in groundwater is
PCE, however, Sections 3.2.1 through 3.2.4 each include a brief results summary for other VOCs
detected during 2019.
Figure 3-5 presents a generalized cross-section of 2019 PCE concentrations along a north to south
transect of OU3. Section 3.2.5 includes a discussion of this cross-section.
March 2020
AECOM
3-2
-------
Annual Remedial Action Report-2019
Finally, Figure 3-6 and 3-7 present PCE concentrations in saprolite and transition zone monitoring wells
during 2007/2008 and 2019, respectively, including PCE concentration results for samples collected from
the Row N-1 injection wells. Section 3.2.6 includes a discussion of these figures.
3.2.1 Source Area Saprolite Wells
For the purposes of this VOC results discussion, source area wells are defined by the facility building
footprint, as well as the loading dock and ancillary buildings to the north (as represented by EW-12,
EW-13, EW-15, and EW-18).
PCE was detected above the 0.7 |jg/L limit prescribed by the North Carolina Administrative Code Title 15A
(NCAC 15A) Subsection 02L.0200 (NC 2L standard) in all of the source area saprolite wells sampled
during 2019. The highest reported concentration of PCE in April was in system well EW-20 (794 |jg/L).
The highest reported concentration of PCE in October was in system well EW-13 (3,280 |jg/L). However,
source area PCE concentrations have generally exhibited a significant downward trend since the AS/SVE
system start-up in 2001. For example:
• Five (5) source area monitoring wells have historically exhibited PCE concentrations above
10,000 |jg/L (EW-7, EW-13, EW-15, EW-17, and EW-20). During 2019, the highest PCE
concentration detected in those system wells was 3,280 |jg/L in EW-13.
• As illustrated on Figure 3-4, the average source area monitoring well PCE concentration has
decreased from a maximum of 12,295 |jg/L in November 2000 to only 404 |jg/L in October 2019.
• Four (4) source area monitoring wells sampled in 2019 exhibited their lowest concentrations of PCE
on record, including wells EW-3, EW-7, EW-18, and EW-19.
Source area PCE concentration decreases are attributed to the operation of the AS/SVE system. TCE
and cDCE are recognized as common products of PCE degradation. Both constituents were also
detected in the source area. Of the twenty-five (25) source area saprolite monitoring wells sampled during
2019, only five (5) wells contained a TCE concentration above the NC 2L standard of 3 |jg/L Vinyl
chloride, the final chlorinated constituent in the most common PCE dechlorination pathway, was not
detected above the NC 2L standard for any source area well sampled in 2019. It should be noted that the
laboratory method detection limit (MDL) was greater than the NC 2L standard for all "non-detections". In
general, concentrations of PCE daughter products are much lower than the corresponding source area
PCE concentrations. These data sets indicate that biodegradation is limited in the source zone.
Carbon tetrachloride (CT) was detected at three (3) source area wells (EW-8, MP-3, and MP-4) above the
NC 2L standard. These wells are all generally located in the southeastern section of the source area. The
primary degradation product of CT is chloroform, which was detected in many of the source area wells but
did not exceed the NC 2L standard. 1,2-dichloropropane (12DCP) and bromodichloromethane (BDCM)
was the only other analyzed COC detected above the NC 2L standard in one (1) source area system
wells during 2019 (MP-4). Concentrations of CT, 12DCP, and DBCM at the Site have historically been
very low in comparison with PCE. As such, these compounds are considered to be secondary COCs.
3.2.2 North Area Saprolite and Transition Zone Wells
The boundary of NC 2L standard exceedances within the north area saprolite and transition zone wells
has been defined by W-18s to the east, W-8s to the west, and W-88s and W-88i to the north. PCE
concentrations in these wells have met the groundwater standard for several consecutive events and
have been non-detect during the most recent sampling event for each. Thus, they were not included in
the 2019 monitoring program.
The highest PCE concentrations outside of the source area have historically been detected in saprolite
wells W-19s, MP-16, and MP-17 and transition zone wells W-30t, IW-4t, IW-5t, and IW-6t. These wells are
located near the centerline of the dissolved phase plume directly downgradient (north) of the source area.
PCE concentrations in, W-30t, IW-4t, and IW-6t remained elevated during 2019 (709 |jg/L, 1,580 |jg/L,
March 2020
AECOM
3-3
-------
Annual Remedial Action Report-2019
and 2,620 |jg/L, respectively) but have gradually decreased from historical maximums (2,610 |jg/L,
8,230 |jg/L, and 14,900 |jg/L, respectively).
Further downgradient, 2019 results for monitoring wells W-20s, W-40s, W-40t, W-89-25, W-90-29, and
W-93-65 demonstrate that PCE concentrations remain within the 111 to 367 |jg/L range as groundwater
approaches the Northern Drainage Feature. Based on several lines of evidence, including pore water
sample results discussed in Section 5.2, groundwater flow net analysis (URS, February 2013), and
historical results for wells located north and south of the Northern Drainage Feature (Appendix E), it is
suspected that the majority of PCE mass within the far north area of the plume is intercepted by vertical
groundwater flow into the Northern Drainage Feature. This conclusion is supported by a comparison of
2019 PCE concentrations in adjacent saprolite and transition monitoring wells; PCE concentrations in
W-20s, W-40s, W-40t, W-89-25, W-90-29, and W93-65 located south of the Northern Drainage Feature)
averaged approximately 205 |jg/L during 2019 whereas PCE concentrations were BDL during 2019 in
W94-65 (located north of the Northern Drainage Feature). As such, the northern boundary of the PCE
plume, historically defined by monitoring wells URS-MW-3, W-31s, W88s, and W-88i, is principally
controlled by the hydraulic divide imposed on groundwater by the Northern Drainage Feature. As
discussed in Section 2.3, recent surface water monitoring results suggest that, beginning in November
2015, the majority of PCE which would otherwise enter the Northern Drainage Feature has been
intercepted by the injected BOS-100® PRB.
The presence and magnitude of other VOCs in groundwater north of the source area have historically
mimicked the pattern exhibited by source area wells; elevated concentrations of PCE with moderate
concentrations of daughter products TCE, cDCE, and vinyl chloride and low intermittent detections of CT
and 12DCP. Results for 2019 were consistent with this pattern.
3.2.3 South Area Saprolite and Transition Zone Wells
PCE concentrations within the south area are generally lower than concentrations observed in the north
area, likely resulting from the relative location of the north-south hydraulic divide and the larger northward
hydraulic gradients. For example, the most elevated detection of PCE in the south area during the historic
term of the project was 880 |jg/L in W-3s in 2003. No other south area monitoring well has ever exhibited
a PCE concentration above 500 |jg/L (see Appendix E).
The dimensions of the plume to the south are shrinking. Examining the records for W-3s and W-5s in
Appendix E, both of which had record low concentrations in 2018, the decreasing trend for these wells
traces to may be partially attributed to the elimination of the pump and treatment system at the adjacent
FCX property, which was suspected of drawing PCE to the south. Neither well was sampled in 2019.
PCE was detected at 33.3 |jg/L in MW-01 and 1.2 |jg/L MW-2, which is generally consistent with historical
results.PCE was not detected in any of the remaining monitoring wells sampled in the south area in
2019..
Aside from the PCE results discussed above, no COCs were detected above NC 2L standards in any
south area saprolite or transition zone well sampled during 2018.
3.2.4 Bedrock Wells
Figure 3-3 presents 2019 PCE concentrations for bedrock monitoring wells. As may be expected, the
highest PCE concentrations in bedrock during 2019 were observed in monitoring wells relatively close to
the source area, including W16i (133 |jg/L), IW-1 (at an estimated 98.9 |jg/L), W-28i (65.3 |jg/L), and IW-
3 (4.7|jg/L). Concentrations in the remaining monitoring wells sampled during 2019 are generally lower by
an order of magnitude or more, reflecting diffusion, dispersion, and chemical and biological degradation of
PCE as groundwater in bedrock flows away from source area. Exceedances of the NC 2L standard for
PCE in bedrock are partially bounded by W10i (8.4 |jg/L) to the east, W-9i (<0.22 ug/L) to the west, W-
32i to the south, and W88d to the north. Historically, monitoring wells W-32i and W88d PCE results are
near the NC 2L standard, therefore, samples were not collected in 2019.
March 2020
AECOM
3-4
-------
Annual Remedial Action Report-2019
Historical PCE concentration data for bedrock monitoring well samples demonstrate a widespread
decreasing trend on all sides of the building. The highest historical PCE concentrations in bedrock were
observed in W-28i (4,300 |jg/L) and W-30i (2,300 |jg/L), which exhibited PCE concentrations of 65.3 |jg/L
and 15.5 |jg/L, respectively, during 2019.
Other VOCs detected above the NC 2L standard in bedrock included TCE in IW-01, W-20i, W-28i, and
W-30i; vinyl chloride in W-28d; CT in W-9i and W-16i; cDCE in W-5i; and 12DCP in W-20i and W-30i.
3.2.5 Cross-Section Profile
Figure 3-5 presents 2019 PCE concentrations along a north to south transect of OU3. The cross-section
depicts that the majority of the dissolved PCE mass is within the source area and in saprolite and
transition zone wells north of the source area. As discussed above in Section 3.2.2, this PCE mass
travels further north, where it either discharges to the overland seep surficial marsh area or is diluted and
degraded through diffusion, dispersion, and chemical or biological degradation. These attenuation
processes result in downgradient saprolite and transition zone PCE concentrations 111 to 367 ug/L, which
are ultimately treated by the injected BOS-100® barrier before entering the Northern Drainage Feature. A
diminishing trace of PCE appears to pass under the Northern Drainage Feature within deeper bedrock, as
demonstrated by detectable PCE concentrations in W-88d (1.2 ug/L in 2018).
3.2.6 Row N-1 Well Results
The overland seep investigation performed during 2017 has demonstrated that the overland seep marsh
water contains elevated concentrations of PCE. The overland seep investigation procedures and results
are discussed in the Annual Remedial Action Progress Report - 2017 (AECOM, April 2018). The overland
seep investigation results prompted an updated assessment of groundwater monitoring well
concentrations in the vicinity of the overland seep discharge. Specifically, the results prompted sampling
of several former injection wells referred to as the Row N-1 wells (i.e., W-44 through W-88 shown on
Figure 2-3). The Row N-1 wells were installed in 2007 as potential injection wells, but were never utilized
for their intended purpose (i.e., no injections have been performed utilizing the Row N-1 wells). Instead,
2007 ANA injections were performed downgradient of the Row N-1 wells via direct push technology (DPT)
injection borings referred to as rows N-2, N-3, and N-4 injection borings.
The Row N-1 wells have not been used for injection but have been used for groundwater monitoring,
including groundwater sampling during 2007. PCE results for the Row N-1 wells, along with 2007 and
2008 PCE results for other saprolite and transition zone monitoring wells within the source area and north
area, are summarized on Figure 3-6. As shown on Figure 3-6, the centerline of elevated PCE
concentrations ran through the former loading dock area (EW-13; an estimated 25,800 |jg/L), towards
system well EW-15 (59,830 |jg/L), through the Row N-1 wells with concentrations as high as 30,000 |jg/L
(W-63), and towards monitoring well IW-6t (an estimated 11,400 |jg/L). However, PCE concentrations
reduce to 1,530 |jg/L as the plume reaches W-30t and then an estimated 366 |jg/L and 67.3 |jg/L at
monitoring wells W-37s and W-37t, respectively. The latter three wells are adjacent to the overland seep
marsh area discussed in Section 2.3.
A select set eleven Row N-1 wells were resampled October 2019. Table 3-3 presents a comparison of the
PCE results for the eleven (11) Row N-1 wells re-sampled and percent PCE changes since the initial
2007 sampling. Eight of these Row N-1 wells exhibited decreases of 78% or greater, including six Row
N-1 wells that showed PCE decreases of greater than 90% during the 2019 sampling. These six Row N-1
wells (between W-55 and W-67) are each down-gradient of air sparge (AS) wells targeting the former
loading dock area. Even though the closest sparge well (AS-28) is more than 130 feet away, the Row N-1
well PCE concentration decreases appear to be attributable to air sparging operations. These
downgradient concentration decreases are likely due to diffusion, dispersion, and advection following
upgradient PCE source depletion Additionally, between the 2017 and 2019 sampling events the majority
of the sis Row N-1 wells (between W-55 and W-67) have either decreased further or have remained
stable.
March 2020
AECOM
3-5
-------
Annual Remedial Action Report-2019
Based on a review of historical PCE results for the Row N-1 wells and surrounding saprolite and transition
zone wells, as illustrated on Figure 3-6 and Figure 3-7, the following conclusions can be made:
• Air sparging efforts have effectively depleted source area PCE. As may be expected, the source
depletion appears to have resulted in a reduction of downgradient PCE concentrations in Row N-1
wells.
• As of 2019, the highest PCE concentrations at the Site are present further downgradient between the
Row N-1 wells and the overland seep area near W-30t (i.e., IW-6t).
March 2020
AECOM
3-6
-------
Annual Remedial Action Report-2019
4. System Remediation
4.1 Historical System Operation Summary
The Rl and Feasibility Study (FS) were completed for the Site in 1996. EPA Region IV executed the ROD
for OU3 on September 30, 1996. The AS/SVE and MNA remedy prescribed by the ROD and subsequent
ESDs for ANA and BOS-100® injections are described in Section 1.2.
The AS/SVE source area remediation began in 2001 with the Phase I AS/SVE performance test. The
performance test included start-up of the Phase I SVE system. Regular operation of the Phase I SVE
system began on July 11, 2001, and AS system operation began on September 17, 2002. The AS/SVE
system was expanded in 2003 (Phase II expansion) with the addition of several SVE, AS, and monitoring
wells. The wells, designated EW-, MP-, or SW-, are shown on Figure 2-3.
Between system start up in 2001 and 2006, approximately 6,250 kilograms (kg) of PCE had been
removed. By 2007 PCE removal rates had become asymptotic, while concentrations of PCE in the
groundwater remained relatively high. In 2009, AECOM (formerly URS Corporation) replaced Brown &
Caldwell (B&C) as the engineering firm on the project and installed additional air sparge wells with a new
sparge well design. The additional wells and new design temporarily increased PCE mass removal rates
in 2009 and 2010. Following a source area assessment completed in 2012, URS expanded the AS/SVE
well network to better address areas of residual impact in 2013. PCE removal rates increased after the
second system expansion and a total of 109 kg were removed during 2013. However, annual PCE totals
steadily decreased again between 2013 to 2017 with only 19 kg of PCE removed during 2017 operations.
The overall effectiveness of the source area AS/SVE system operations resulted in substantial
improvement in groundwater quality. The dimensions of the plume to the east, west, and south have
shrunk. Bedrock monitoring well PCE data demonstrates a widespread decreasing trend on all sides of
the building, and decreasing trends have been noted along the edges of the north area plume. The
reduction in the size and intensity of the overall PCE plume is likely attributable to diffusion and dispersion
following upgradient PCE source depletion (i.e. source area AS/SVE system operations). As mentioned in
Section 3.2.6, the highest PCE concentrations at the Site are present further downgradient between the
Row N-1 wells and the overland seep area near W-30t (i.e., IW-6t). Air sparging efforts have effectively
reduced source area PCE. Figure 3-4 presents a graphic showing the average PCE groundwater
concentration for the groundwater monitoring wells deemed representative of the source area. The
average source area monitoring well PCE concentration has decreased from a maximum of 12,295
micrograms per liter (fjg/L) in November 2000 to 1,647 in October 2012 to only 280 ug/L in April 2018.
Given that even the highest concentrations within the facility building footprint are lower than PCE
concentrations in monitoring wells IW-6t and W-19s, AECOM determined continuing source area AS/SVE
system opeations would yield minimal benefits.
On July 27th, 2018, with agency approval, EPNG suspended operations on the source area AS/SVE
system. Following a year of suspended AS/SVE operations, EPNG proposed the permanent shut down
and dismantlement based on average PCE concentrations for October 2018 and April 2019 (177 and 195
|jg/L, respectively) source area groundwater samples, which were collected while the AS/SVE system
was inactive, were both less than the average PCE concentrations of 280 ug/L in April 2018. Additionally,
six of the ten source area monitoring wells sampled reported decreases after the system was shut down,
including decreases of approximately an order of magnitude or greater in wells EW-4 and EW-16. On July
31st, 2019, the agency approved the dismantlement of the source area AS/SVE system
4.2 Northern AS System Installation and Design
Currently, the highest remaining PCE concentrations in groundwater at the Site are located downgradient
of the northern extent of the existing air sparge well network. Given the effectiveness of air sparging
within the building source area, EPNG has asked AECOM to move forward with the installation of a new
AS system. Since AS is already the primary treatment technology in the ROD, applying it in this area can
March 2020
AECOM
4-1
-------
Annual Remedial Action Report-2019
be accomplished without a modification to the ROD, or even an Explanation of Significant Difference
(ESD). Remediation of this area should cause a permanent decrease in the PCE concentrations at the
seeps, thereby reducing or eliminating the elevated concentrations entering the Northern Drainage.
To work with scheduling and budgetary requirements, the installation of the northern AS system has been
broken down into three phases of work. Phase one was completed in October 2019 with the installation of
a new fully-integrated air sparge equipment enclosure. Phase two will occur in March 2020 with the
installation of 48 new AS wells (AW-1 through AW-48). Phase three will conclude with the installation of
piping from the AS well to the system building. Figures and diagrams for the AS system building design
and proposed AS well locations are included in Appendix F. A comprehensive as-built package will be
provided in a later report once installation of the northern AS system is complete.
March 2020
AECOM
4-2
-------
Annual Remedial Action Report-2019
5. Other 2019 Activities
The purpose of this section is to identify and briefly discuss the purpose and results of additional work
conducted in support of the overall OU3 remedy during 2019. Reports summarizing these investigations
have either been previously submitted to USEPA and NCDEQ, will be generated and submitted
separately, and/or are provided as appendices to this report.
5.1 Surface Water and Porewater Sampling
Based on historical exceedances of the standard set forth by NCAC 15A Subsection 02B.0200 (NC 2B
standard) for PCE in the Northern Drainage Feature, surface water investigations were performed in 2009
and 2010 (URS, May 2010; URS, April 2010) and quarterly surface water sampling events have been
performed since 2012 at the request NCDEQ Division of Water Resources (DWR). Surface water
sampling has been performed to assess impacts to the North Drainage Feature and Southern Drainage
Feature discussed in previous sections. The locations of these streams are shown on Figure 2-2.
Quarterly surface water sampling events continued during 2019 and were documented in quarterly
surface water monitoring reports provided to NCDEQ and USEPA.
Sampling and analysis of streambed porewater beneath the Northern Drainage Feature was first
completed in 2009 during initial surface water investigations (URS, May 2010). Additional porewater
sampling has been performed between 2013 and 2019 to support design and performance assessment of
the BOS-100® PRB injections discussed in previous sections. Procedures and results for surface water
and porewater sampling performed during 2019 are summarized in the following sections. All laboratory
reports for 2019 surface water and porewater samples are presented in Appendix D.
5.1.1 Surface Water Sampling Activities
Surface water samples were collected from five (6) discrete sampling locations (URS-SW-D2, URS-SW-
03, URS-SW-F, URS-SW-16, URS-SW-22, and URS-SW-T4) in March, May, August, and November
2019. Surface water samples were collected from five (5) additional discrete sampling locations (URS-
SW-02, URS-SW-G, URS-SW-05, and URS-SW-09) in November 2019. All sample locations except for
SW-URS-09 are within the Northern Drainage Feature. Sample location URS-SW-09 is located in the
Southern Drainage Feature. Sample locations are shown on Figure G-1 of Appendix G.
The samples were analyzed for the following VOCs: PCE, TCE, cDCE, and vinyl chloride. Samples were
also analyzed for general water quality indicator parameters including: pH, temperature, specific
conductivity, ORP, and DO. Total Suspended Solids (TSS) analysis was discontinued for the 2018
sampling as TSS concentrations have not previously exceeded NC 2B standards in surface water (two
historical samples have exceeded the NC 2B standards at the URS-SW-15 location which represents
downstream flow from the overland seep discharge). TSS concentration results have not exhibited
significant or useful historical trend data, do not appear to have been influenced by remedial injections,
and have mostly been below laboratory MDLs.
5.1.2 Surface Water Analytical Results
Surface water analytical results are presented in Table G-1 and Table G-2, both included in Appendix G.
Table G-1 presents the 2019 surface water sample data and Table G-2 summarizes historical surface
water sample results through November 018.
Analytical data for URS-SW-05, the downstream Northern Drainage Feature sample location, remained
below the 2B standards for PCE and its daughter compounds in 2019. These analytical results are
consistent with the previous sampling events. As shown on Table G-1 of Appendix G, several surface
water samples contained PCE concentrations which exceed the NC 2B standard of 3.3 |jg/L. No VOCs
other than PCE were detected above their respective NC 2B standard during 2018, consistent with
historical results.
March 2020
AECOM
5-1
-------
Annual Remedial Action Report-2019
PCE concentrations in the Northern Drainage Feature fluctuate seasonally and generally exhibit
maximum concentrations in winter and spring and minimum concentrations in summer and fall. Surface
water PCE concentrations have exhibited consistent decreasing trends since the Phase 1 and Phase 2
injections (Table G-2 of Appendix G). Specifically, PCE concentration decreases at locations URS-SW-E,
URS-SW-F, URS-SW-16, and URS-SW-22 since the injections. However, in March 2019, PCE was
detected above the NC 2B in several sampling locations including sample locations URS-SW-03, URS-
SW-16, URS-SW-22, URS-SWF, URS-SWG, and URS-SW-T4. PCE at these locations likely originates
from PCE detected within overland groundwater seepage, which collects and discharges into the
Northern Drainage Feature directly upstream of the URS-SW-03 sampling location. PCE concentrations
at these locations are prone to increases in winter months when there is less evaporation and
volatilization for the water emanating from the seeps. As seen in Table G-3 of Appendix G, samples
have been collected from the overland seep drainage pipe (Culvert) that feeds into the northern drainage
feature since October 2015. In March 2019, PCE was recorded at its highest concentration of 47.8 |jg/l,
resulting in elevated results within the Northern Drainage. Remedial options for the upgradient sources of
PCE in the overland seep are currently being constructed as discussed in Section 4.2. Treatment of
these sources would be expected to permanently reduce or eliminate PCE concentrations at the Culvert
and URS-SW03 sampling locations.
5.1.3 Porewater Sampling Activities
A total of (9) piezometers (PZ-99, PZ-100, and PZ-107 through PZ-113) are currently present within the
Northern Drainage Feature (Figure G-2 of Appendix G). The piezometers allow sampling and analysis of
water within streambed sediment pores (porewater) approximately 2 to 4 feet below the streambed
surface. Installation and sampling procedures and analytical results for the six co-located piezometer
pairs were described in the Injection Pilot Test Summary Report (URS, August 2014).
Samples were collected from four (4) piezometer locations (PZ-105D, PZ-111, PZ-112, and PZ-113) in
November 2019. The samples were analyzed for the following VOCs: PCE, TCE, cDCE, and vinyl
chloride. Samples were also analyzed for general water quality indicator parameters including: pH,
temperature, specific conductivity, ORP, and DO.
5.1.4 Porewater Analytical Results
Historical porewater analytical results for samples collected between October 2013 and November 2019
are presented in Table G-3 of Appendix G. Porewater PCE concentrations represent the leading edge of
the plume, just prior to entering the Northern Drainage Feature surface water. The data was useful during
the design of the BOS-100® PRB injections and has subsequently been monitored to assess the
performance of the injections in attempting to cut off the plume's leading edge.
As shown in Table G-3 of Appendix G, PCE concentrations were reduced by 95-percent in piezometer
PZ-105D, respectively, between April 2015 and November 2019. These decreases are assumed to have
resulted from the full-scale November 2015 Phase 1 injection. PCE concentrations for samples collected
in November 2019 from piezometers PZ-111, PZ-112 and PZ-113 remain below historical maximums.The
effectiveness of Phase 2 remedial efforts in this section of the Northern Drainage Feature will continue to
be monitored.
March 2020
AECOM
5-2
-------
Annual Remedial Action Report-2019
6. 2020 Planned Activities
6.1 Groundwater Monitoring
Groundwater monitoring will continue semi-annually, generally consistent with the 2007 ANA Work Plan
(B & C, March 2007). Given that groundwater table conditions are well understood at the Site, a reduced
gauging plan will be implemented in 2020. Additionally, the QAPP will be updated to include accepted
programmatic changes implemented since the last version was created.
6.2 Surface Water
Surface water will continue to be sampled during 2019 in accordance with NCDEQ DWR's request for
quarterly monitoring and to further evaluate the effect of the BOS-100® injections described in previous
sections.
A summary for the proposed 2020 scope of work is provided as follows:
• Quarterly sampling at six (6) sampling locations (URS-SW-03, URS-SW16, URS-SW-22, URS-SW
D2, URS-SWF, and URS-SW-T4). One (1) duplicate sample will be collected during each sampling
event, as well as laboratory QA/QC samples, as required. Surface water samples will be analyzed
for the following VOCs: PCE, TCE, cDCE, and vinyl chloride.
• Annual sampling at three (3) sampling locations (URS-SW02, URS-SW-05, and URS-SW-09) and
from four (4) piezometers (PZ-105D, PZ-111, PZ-112, and PZ-113). These samples would be
collected during the winter sampling event based on historical results. Seasonal surface water
sample results generally exhibit higher PCE concentrations during winter months. VOC
concentrations for these sample locations have never exceeded NC 2B standards, annual sampling
would be sufficient to document that the concentrations remain stable.
The 2020 surface water sampling activities will be documented in quarterly surface water monitoring
reports provided to NCDEQ and USEPA. Surface water results will also be summarized in the Annual
Remedial Action Progress Report for 2020.
6.3 Northern AS System Well Installation
AECOM will start Phase two of the northern AS system installation in March 2020. Phase two will include
the installation of 48 new AS wells (AW-1 through AW-48). Each AS well will be constructed using a 2"
Schedule 40 PVC inner casing with a 2-foot long 0.010-inch machine-slotted well screen. The annular
space between the well screen and the borehole will be packed with a No. 2 fine filter sand from the
termination depth to approximately two feet above the screened interval. A minimum of three feet of
bentonite will be placed above the sand pack with the remaining annular space grouted to the surface
with a cement and bentonite grout mix. A figure depicting proposed AS well locations as well as proposed
AS well depths and design is included in Appendix F.
March 2020
AECOM
6-1
-------
Annual Remedial Action Report-2019
7. References
AECOM, June 2016. "Annual Remediation Progress Report-2015," FCX (Statesville) Superfund Site
(OU3) Statesville, North Carolina. AECOM Technical Services, Inc. of North Carolina.
AECOM, May 2017. "Annual Remediation Progress Report-2016," FCX (Statesville) Superfund Site
(OU3) Statesville, North Carolina. AECOM Technical Services, Inc. of North Carolina.
AECOM, April 2018. "Annual Remediation Progress Report-2017," FCX (Statesville) Superfund Site
(OU3) Statesville, North Carolina. AECOM Technical Services, Inc. of North Carolina.
Aquaterra, July 1996. "Final Remediation Investigation Report," FCX-Statesville Superfund Site OU3,
Statesville, North Carolina. Aquaterra, Inc.
B & C, March 2007. "Phase I Design for Accelerated Natural Attenuation," FCX-Statesville Superfund Site
OU3, Statesville, North Carolina. Brown and Caldwell.
USEPA, February 2016. "Data Validation Standard Operating Procedures," United States Environmental
Protection Agency.
USEPA, August 2015. "Explanation of Significant Difference to the Operable Unit 3 Remedial Action, for
the FCX-Statesville Site, Statesville, Iredell County, North Carolina," United States Environmental
Protection Agency Region IV, Atlanta, Georgia.
USEPA, September 2006. "Explanation of Significant Difference Operable Unit 3 Remedial Action, FCX-
Statesville Superfund Site," United States Environmental Protection Agency Region IV, Atlanta,
Georgia.
USEPA, October 2004. "Contract Laboratory Program National Functional Guideline for Inorganic Data
Review". United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response, Washington, DC, 20460.
USEPA, October 1999. "Contract Laboratory Program National Functional Guideline for Organic Data
Review". United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response, Washington, DC, 20460.
USEPA, December 1996. "Method 8260B, Volatile Organic Compounds by Gas Chromatography/Mass
Spectrometry (GC/MS)." United States Environmental Protection Agency.
USEPA, September 1996. "EPA Superfund Record of Decision: FCX, Inc. (Statesville Plant)." United
States Environmental Protection Agency Region IV Environmental Services Division, Hazardous
Waste Section, Athens, Georgia, 30613.
USEPA, August 1993. "Method 300, Determination of Inorganic Anions by Ion Chromatography." United
States Environmental Protection Agency Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Office of
Research and Development, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45268.
URS, July 2016. "Annual Remediation Progress Report - 2015," FCX (Statesville) Superfund Site (OU3),
Statesville, North Carolina. URS Corporation.
URS, August 2014. "Injection Pilot Test Summary Report," FCX (Statesville) Superfund Site (OU3),
Statesville, North Carolina. URS Corporation.
URS, June 2014. "Annual Remediation Progress Report - 2013," FCX (Statesville) Superfund Site (OU3),
Statesville, North Carolina. URS Corporation.
URS, December 2013. "Vapor Intrusion Abandonment Activities," FCX (Statesville) Superfund Site (OU3),
Statesville, North Carolina. URS Corporation.
March 2020
AECOM
7-1
-------
Annual Remedial Action Report-2019
URS, March 2013. "AS\SVE System Expansion Work Plan," FCX (Statesville) Superfund Site (OU3),
Statesville, North Carolina. URS Corporation.
URS, February 2013. "Pre-Design Investigation Interim Data Report," FCX (Statesville) Superfund Site
(OU3), Statesville, North Carolina. URS Corporation.
URS, May 2012. "Source Area Investigation Report," FCX (Statesville) Superfund Site (OU3), Statesville,
North Carolina. URS Corporation.
URS, November 2010. "Air Sparge Pilot Test," Statesville FCX Superfund Site, Operable Unit 3 (OU3),
Statesville, North Carolina. URS Corporation.
URS, May 2010. "Surface Water Assessment," May 2010, FCX (Statesville) Superfund Site (OU3)
Statesville, North Carolina. URS Corporation.
URS, April 2010. "April 2010 Surface Water Assessment Report," October 2010, FCX (Statesville)
Superfund Site (OU3) Statesville, North Carolina. URS Corporation.
URS, August 2009. "Semi-Annual Remedial Action Progress Report July-December 2008," Statesville
FCX Superfund Site, Operable Unit 3 (OU3), Statesville, North Carolina. URS Corporation.
URS, April 2009. "Quality Assurance Project Plan," FCX (Statesville) Superfund Site OU3, Statesville,
North Carolina. URS Corporation.
URS, November 2008. "Conceptual Site Model and Data Gap Analysis," Statesville FCX Superfund Site,
Operable Unit 3 (OU3), Statesville, North Carolina. URS Corporation.
March 2020
AECOM
7-2
-------
Tables
-------
Table 2-1
0U3 Monitoring and Remediation Well Construction Summary
FCX-Statesville Superfund Site 0U3
Well IDa
Total Depth
Total Depth -
2007b
Screen
Interval
Ground
Surface
Elevation
Top of Casing
Elevation
(ft below TOC)
(ft below TOC)
(ft bgs)
(ft above MSL)
(ft above MSL)
North Area Saprolite or Transition Zone Wells
W-01S
47.74
—
38-48
964.33
963.80
W-06s
37.72
37.62
22-37
947.17
947.07
W-07s
30.00
—
15-30
948.04
947.96
W-08s
35.00
34.56
20-35
942.60
943.18
W-09s
51.50
—
34-49
964.47
965.99
W-10s
35.08
35.18
-
947.00
946.73
W-10t
55.43
55.45
46-56
947.48
947.16
W-11s
42.70
-
25-40
958.50
961.14
W-12s (ABN Dec. 2018)
33.00
—
18-33
954.10
956.73
W-14s (ABN Dec. 2018)
41.52
-
37-52
957.74
957.59
W-16s
49.07
—
35-50
965.57
965.13
W-17s
44.47
-
29.5-44.5
965.60
965.31
W-18s
37.90
37.94
22.5-37.5
949.95
949.27
W-19s
29.97
30.06
17-27
934.37
937.05
W-20s
14.40
14.18
4 -14
896.84
895.42
W-21s
20.20
19.91
10-20
928.48
927.21
W-21t
80.57
80.52
66-81
927.57
927.23
W-30t
34.81
34.81
25-35
913.74
913.38
W-31s
15.69
15.50
5 -15
896.99
896.58
W-34t
63.51
61.38
47-62
947.98
947.57
W-35s
35.74
35.74
26-36
944.52
944.16
W-35t
50.93
50.98
41 - 51
942.95
942.65
W-36s
21.02
21.02
12-22
930.77
930.34
W-36t
35.51
35.51
26-36
929.20
928.86
W-37s
14.60
17.56
4-14
908.59
911.41
W-37t
81.00
-
66.0-81.1
908.81
911.32
W-38s
42.76
42.76
30-40
908.83
911.72
W-38t
118.49
115.56
100-115
909.63
912.65
W-39s
43.17
43.17
30-40
907.99
911.01
W-40s
18.31
21.34
8-18
899.01
902.11
W-40t
95.88
95.61
78-95
899.63
902.75
W-88s
25.00
-
15-25
903.50
905.66
W-88i
84.00
—
69-84
904.93
907.08
URS-MW-01
15.00
-
9.11 -14.38
902.01
905.09
URS-MW-02C (ABN Dec. 2018)
10.00
-
2.87-8.14
897.09
902.39
URS-MW-02dc (ABN Dec. 2018)
26.00
-
20.72 -25.99
897.67
901.42
URS-MW-03
9.00
-
3.28-8.66
894.86
894.61
MP-16
55.10
56.00
46-56
947.83
947.53
MP-17
50.50
50.42
41 -51
948.46
948.04
IW-04t
59.95
59.81
57.5-60
947.65
947.34
IW-05t
65.15
65.03
62.0-65.5
949.01
948.66
IW-06t
41.61
41.69
27.5-42.0
927.14
926.88
L:\DCS\Projects\ENV\60562430_KMS_OU3FCX\500-Deliverables\503-Annual Report\2019 Annual RA Progress Report\Tables\Table 2-1 Well Const Sum_20200312.xls
1 of 6
-------
Table 2-1
0U3 Monitoring and Remediation Well Construction Summary
FCX-Statesville Superfund Site 0U3
Well IDa
Total Depth
Total Depth -
2007b
Screen
Interval
Ground
Surface
Elevation
Top of Casing
Elevation
(ft below TOC)
(ft below TOC)
(ft bgs)
(ft above MSL)
(ft above MSL)
North Area Intermediate or Deep Bedrock Wells
W-01i
72.38
—
62.5-72.5
964.77
964.65
W-08i
93.00
-
83-93
943.05
943.80
W-09i
93.20
93.13
81 -91
964.52
967.21
W-10i
68.69
-
59-69
947.30
946.50
W-12i (ABN Dec. 2018)
83.00
—
73-83
954.60
957.59
W-14i (ABN Dec. 2018)
95.60
-
105-115
956.78
956.60
W-16i
86.50
—
77-87
965.58
965.07
W-20i
94.36
94.20
84-94
897.70
897.50
W-20d
161.75
150.43
152-162
897.44
897.19
W-26i
117.90
117.64
103-118
925.04
924.86
W-28i
98.46
—
73-88
963.04
962.79
W-28d
249.00
-
234 - 249
962.90
962.69
W-30i
57.00
—
47.5-57.5
915.35
915.30
W-31 i
44.68
44.43
34-44
896.66
896.28
W-33i
107.62
—
98-108
960.58
960.14
W-33d
202.61
-
188-203
960.62
960.24
W-88d
134.00
—
114-134
911.00
913.11
IW-01
130.10
127.52
76-136
948.81
948.41
IW-02 (ABN Aug. 2015)
131.00
130.85
72-132
947.17
946.63
IW-03
130.00
-
71 -131.5
949.17
949.00
South Area Saprolite or Transition Zone Wells
W-02s (ABN Aug. 2015)
44.10
44.20
33.5-43.5
963.67
963.36
W-03s
43.84
43.93
34-44
961.37
960.90
W-04s
44.00
43.72
34-44
964.92
964.42
W-05s
43.42
43.44
32-42
961.94
961.72
W-13s (ABN Dec. 2018)
30.00
29.70
15-30
964.80
964.57
W-15s (ABN Dec. 2018)
51.63
41.40
30-45
972.61
972.32
W-22s (ABN circa 2000d)
35.00
-
20-35
-
-
W-23s (ABN Dec. 2018)
20.15
20.15
25-40
934.89
934.23
W-24s
20.09
20.17
5-20
920.17
919.62
W-25s (ABN Dec. 2018)
25.13
—
10-25
930.24
930.01
W-27s (ABN Dec. 2018)
40.95
-
25-40
947.85
947.48
W-41t (ABN Dec. 2018)
62.00
—
47-62
959.70
960.01
MW-01
43.09
43.10
41.56-51.56
947.44
949.50
MW-02
50.23
50.22
42.52-52.52
952.01
954.22
MW-03 (ABN Dec. 2018)
53.01
—
43.01 -53.01
952.47
954.51
MW-04 (ABN Dec. 2018)
53.94
—
51.43-61.43
963.21
965.87
MW-05s (ABN Dec. 2018)
42.75
42.78
48.03-58.03
949.12
952.02
MW-06s
53.85
—
45.36- 55.36
956.52
960.52
MW-07
52.51
—
37-47
947.87
950.69
MW-08
53.43
—
45.88-55.88
961.20
964.20
MW-09
45.28
45.22
53.50-63.50
955.53
959.42
MW-10
47.70
47.72
50.56-60.56
955.34
959.08
L:\DCS\Projects\ENV\60562430_KMS_OU3FCX\500-Deliverables\503-Annual Report\2019 Annual RA Progress Report\Tables\Table 2-1 Well Const Sum_20200312.xls
2 of 6
-------
Table 2-1
0U3 Monitoring and Remediation Well Construction Summary
FCX-Statesville Superfund Site 0U3
Well IDa
Total Depth
Total Depth -
2007b
Screen
Interval
Ground
Surface
Elevation
Top of Casing
Elevation
(ft below TOC)
(ft below TOC)
(ft bgs)
(ft above MSL)
(ft above MSL)
South Area Intermediate or Deep Bedrock Wells
W-Q2!
92.50
—
83-93
963.44
963.31
W-05i
67.66
-
56-66
961.94
961.92
W-13i (ABN Dec. 2018)
79.85
79.80
70-80
964.67
964.05
W-15i (ABN Dec. 2018)
130.00
-
71 -81
972.43
972.35
W-22i (ABN circa 2000d)
67.00
-
57-67
-
-
W-29i
98.00
-
88-98
913.42
913.18
W-32i
131.45
—
112-132
890.89
890.55
W-42i
88.00
-
78-88
946.72
946.22
MW-05d (ABN Aug. 2007)
130.00
—
-
948.11
949.45
MW-06d (ABN Aug. 2007)
130.00
-
--
956.27
957.51
MW-11 (ABN Aug. 2007)
75.20
75.04
--
920.75
920.50
Northern Drainage Pre-Design Investigation Monitoring Wells
W-89-10 (ABN Dec. 2018)
10.00
—
5-10
901.27
903.83
W-89-25
25.00
-
20-25
901.37
903.61
W-90-15° (ABN Dec. 2018)
15.00
-
10 -15
900.38
903.23
W-90-29c
29.00
-
24-29
900.42
903.35
W-91-15
15.00
-
10-15
-
-
W-92-15 (ABN Dec. 2018)
15.00
-
10 -15
902.06
904.70
W-92-33 (ABN Dec. 2018)
33.00
-
28-33
902.69
905.53
W-92-50 (ABN Dec. 2018)
50.00
-
45-50
903.43
905.77
W-92-65 (ABN Dec. 2018)
65.00
-
60-65
902.62
905.10
W-93-15 (ABN Aug. 2015)
15.00
-
10 -15
898.80
901.40
W-93-28 (ABN Aug. 2015)
28.00
-
23-28
898.78
901.06
W-93-40c (ABN Dec. 2018)
40.00
-
35-40
899.10
901.52
W-93-52° (ABN Dec. 2018)
52.00
-
47-52
898.57
900.72
W-93-65°
65.00
-
60-65
898.83
900.97
W-94-15
15.00
-
10 -15
897.26
900.36
W-94-28 (ABN Dec. 2018)
28.00
-
23-28
897.93
900.96
W-94-40 (ABN Dec. 2018)
40.00
-
35-40
897.61
900.41
W-94-52 (ABN Dec. 2018)
52.00
-
47-52
897.84
900.62
W-94-65
65.00
—
60-65
898.03
900.51
W-95-15
15.00
-
10 -15
897.14
899.66
W-95-25 (ABN Dec. 2018)
25.00
—
20-25
896.72
899.57
PRB-7-PZ (ABN Dec. 2018)
8.00
-
7-8
901.17
903.82
L:\DCS\Projects\ENV\60562430_KMS_OU3FCX\500-Deliverables\503-Annual Report\2019 Annual RA Progress Report\Tables\Table 2-1 Well Const Sum_20200312.xls
3 of 6
-------
Table 2-1
0U3 Monitoring and Remediation Well Construction Summary
FCX-Statesville Superfund Site 0U3
Well ID3
Total Depth
Total Depth -
2007b
Screen
Interval
Ground
Surface
Elevation
Top of Casing
Elevation
(ft below IOC)
(ft below TOC)
(ft bgs)
(ft above MSL)
(ft above MSL)
Inactive Liquid Injection Wells
W-41
73 92
—
24-74
947.44
946.87
W-42
70 45
-
27-72
947.20
946.59
W-43
69 65
—
25-70
947.59
947.32
W-44
66 45
-
26-67
947.72
947.32
W-45
65 70
—
26-66
948.37
947.94
W-46
62 65
-
29-63
949.09
948.61
W-47
66 58
—
27-67
948.59
948.93
W-48
67.70
-
28-68
948.75
948.29
W-49
68.39
—
24-69
948.56
948.12
W-50
66.70
-
27-67
948.42
947.96
W-51
65.20
—
25-65
948.37
947.89
W-54
66.05
-
26-66
947.75
947.37
W-55
64.97
—
25-65
947.58
947.97
W-56
61.52
-
27-62
947.40
946.87
W-57
60.60
—
26-61
947.47
946.92
W-58
59.80
-
25-60
947.36
946.94
W-59
57.10
—
27-57
947.28
946.99
W-60
58.62
-
24-59
947.27
946.85
W-61
58.25
—
24-59
947.44
947.04
W-62
56.55
-
27-57
947.07
947.42
W-63
56.80
—
27-57
947.53
947.20
W-64
56.60
-
27-57
947.61
947.12
W-65
57.15
—
23-58
947.89
947.53
W-66
58.00
-
24-59
948.13
947.74
W-67
59.86
—
25-60
948.28
947.88
W-68
59.51
-
24-59
948.09
947.71
W-69
59.65
—
25-60
948.02
947.59
W-70
59.64
-
25-60
947.88
947.54
W-71
60.08
—
25-60
948.37
947.99
W-72
60.56
-
26-61
948.33
947.95
W-73
59.64
—
25-60
948.80
948.46
W-74
59.85
-
25-60
949.21
948.77
W-75
59.39
—
25-60
949.53
948.99
W-76
56.23
-
25-56
949.82
949.50
W-77
65.92
—
27-67
949.90
949.46
W-78
58.95
-
25-60
950.00
949.63
W-79
59.00
—
25-60
950.24
949.76
W-80
58.65
-
30-60
950.51
949.91
W-81
59.20
—
30-60
950.37
950.76
W-82
51.69
-
30-55
950.86
950.37
W-83
51.53
—
27-52
951.15
950.75
W-84
44.65
-
25-45
951.19
950.87
W-85
48.69
—
24-49
951.24
950.64
W-86
44.22
-
25-45
951.27
950.73
W-87
49.05
--
25-50
951.38
951.07
L:\DCS\Projects\ENV\60562430_KMS_OU3FCX\500-Deliverables\503-Annual Report\2019 Annual RA Progress Report\Tables\Table 2-1 Well Const Sum_20200312.xls
4 of 6
-------
Table 2-1
0U3 Monitoring and Remediation Well Construction Summary
FCX-Statesville Superfund Site 0U3
Well ID3
Total Depth
Total Depth -
2007b
Screen
Interval
Ground
Surface
Elevation
Top of Casing
Elevation
(ft below IOC)
(ft below TOC)
(ft bgs)
(ft above MSL)
(ft above MSL)
Source Area Concentric Design Wells
EW-G1 (SW-G1)
55.96
56.08
51.9-54.4
965.64
968.77
EW-02 (SW-02)
56.15
56.18
52.9 -55.4
965.60
968.77
EW-03
63.20
62.46
58.2 -60.7
965.51
968.06
EW-04 (SW-04)
61.90
62.19
57.6 -60.1
965.60
968.75
EW-05
55.71
55.53
50.7 -53.2
965.60
968.09
EW-06
60.66
59.72
54.7 -57.2
965.60
968.08
EW-07
61.82
62.91
56.9 -59.4
965.60
968.13
EW-08
57.86
57.98
53.2 -55.7
965.61
967.93
EW-09
55.56
55.75
53.6 -56.1
965.56
965.24
EW-10
56.66
53.80
52.8 -55.3
964.42
964.08
EW-11
64.35
64.57
58.9-61.4
965.52
967.81
EW-12
67.90
67.78
66.4-68.9
960.53
960.22
EW-13
50.50
50.38
48.5-51.0
961.44
960.98
EW-14
53.20
53.20
48.2 -50.7
965.56
967.86
EW-15
54.19
54.00
52.1 -54.6
962.42
962.12
EW-16
58.01
58.02
53.3 -55.8
965.56
967.83
EW-17 (SW-17)
59.71
59.90
56.4 -58.9
965.55
968.47
EW-18
62.97
62.93
53.5 -63.5
963.07
962.32
EW-19
63.13
53.28
51.0-61.0
965.54
967.66
EW-20
50.59
50.46
46.1 -48.6
965.63
967.94
EW-21
55.91
55.98
51.2-53.7
965.60
967.73
EW-22
62.78
63.17
57.8 -60.3
965.62
967.99
EW-23 (SW-23)
61.26
61.34
57.7 -60.2
965.63
968.59
EW-24
57.67
57.80
53.1 -55.6
965.67
968.03
MP-01
55.74
55.52
58.0 -60.5
965.58
965.26
MP-03
53.98
53.76
51.7-54.2
965.69
965.61
MP-04 (EW-26)
54.12
54.18
51.9-54.4
965.61
964.97
MP-07
54.54
54.78
52.3 -54.8
965.59
965.19
MP-08
54.43
54.45
52.3 -54.8
965.57
965.35
MP-15
51.70
54.60
49.3-51.8
965.58
965.30
Source Area Dedicated Soil Vapor Extraction Wells
EW-25
41.00
-
16-41
-
-
EW-27
31.00
—
6-31
—
—
EW-28
31.00
--
6-31
-
--
Source Area Dedicated Air Sparging Wells
AS-25R
59.00
-
57-59
-
-
AS-26
48.00
—
46-48
—
—
AS-27R
63.00
-
61 -63
-
-
AS-28
65.00
—
63-65
—
—
AS-29
65.00
-
63-65
-
-
AS-30
65.00
—
63-65
—
—
AS-31
65.00
--
63-65
-
--
L:\DCS\Projects\ENV\60562430_KMS_OU3FCX\500-Deliverables\503-Annual Report\2019 Annual RA Progress Report\Tables\Table 2-1 Well Const Sum_20200312.xls
5 of 6
-------
Table 2-1
OU3 Monitoring and Remediation Well Construction Summary
FCX-Statesville Superfund Site OU3
Notes:
'"Alternate well IDs, where applicable, are shown in parenthesis.
bTotal depth measured during the 2007 baseline groundwater monitoring event.
cMonitoring wells were cut down to grade for the Phase 1 BOS-100® injection event. The stick up casings were replaced after the
injection event. The TOC elevations listed for these wells in the table were surveyed by AECOM following stick-up casing
replacement.
dW-22s and W-22i were presumably abandoned circa 2000 during OU2 construction activities.
- = not applicable or available
ABN = abandoned
bgs = below ground surface
ft = feet
MSL = mean sea level
TOC = top of casing
Northern Drainage pre-design investigation wells, inactive injection wells, and source area monitoring and remediation wells are
screened within saprolite or the transition zone.
Source Area Concentric Design Wells are screened in saprolite in both the vadose and saturated zones. The screen intervals shown
represent the saturated zone (monitoring or air sparge) screen intervals.
L:\DCS\Projects\ENV\60562430_KMS_OU3FCX\500-Deliverables\503-Annual Report\2019 Annual RA Progress Report\Tables\Table 2-1 Well Const Sum_20200312.xls
6 of 6
-------
Table 2-2A
April 2019 Groundwater Elevation Data
FCX-Statesville Superfund Site OLJ3
Well IDa
Ground
Surface
Elevation
Top of Casing
Elevation
Screen
Interval
Depth to
Groundwater
Groundwater
Elevation
(ft above MSL)
(ft above MSL)
(ft bgs)
(ft below TOC)
(ft above MSL)
North Area Saprolite or Transition Zone Wells
W-01s
96433
963.80
38-48
38.30
925.50
W-Q6S
947.17
947.07
22-37
25.20
921.87
W-07s
948.04
947.96
15-30
26.26
921.70
W-08s
942.60
943.18
20-35
20.91
922.27
W-09s
964.47
965.99
34-49
36.16
929.83
W-10s
947.00
946.73
20-35
20.96
925.77
W-10t
947.48
947.16
46-56
22.25
924.91
W-11s
958.50
961.14
25-40
28.63
932.51
W-16s
965.57
965.13
35-50
37.67
927.46
W-17s
965.60
965.31
29.5 - 44.5
37.26
928.05
W-18s
949.95
949.27
22.5 - 37.5
20.90
928.37
W-19s
934.37
937.05
17-27
17.98
919.07
W-20s
896.84
895.42
4-14
5.00
890.42
W-21s
928.48
927.21
10-20
11.11
916.10
W-21t
927.57
927.23
66-81
10.60
916.63
W-30t
913.74
913.38
25-35
0.00
913.38
W-31s
896.99
896.58
5-15
6.39
890.19
W-34t
947.98
947.57
47-62
25.34
922.23
W-35s
944.52
944.16
26-36
20.87
923.29
W-35t
942.95
942.65
41 -51
20.21
922.44
W-36s
930.77
930.34
12-22
12.60
917.74
W-36t
929.20
928.86
26-36
11.24
917.62
W-37s
908.59
911.41
4-14
4.50
906.91
W-37t
908.81
911.32
66.0-81.1
AW
NC
W-38s
908.83
911.72
30-40
5.29
906.43
W-38t
909.63
912.65
100-115
2.63
910.02
W-39s
907.99
911.01
30-40
6.90
904.11
W-40s
899.01
902.11
8-18
5.90
896.21
W-40t
899.63
902.75
78-95
6.60
896.15
W-88i
904.93
907.08
15-25
14.67
892.41
URS-MW-01
902.01
905.09
9.11 -14.38
8.78
896.31
URS-MW-Q3
894.86
894.61
3.28 - 8.66
2.91
891.70
MP-16
947.83
947.53
46-56
25.91
921.62
MP-17
948.46
948.04
41 -51
25.49
922.55
IW-04t
947.65
947.34
57.5 - 60
25.97
921.37
IW-05t
949.01
948.66
62.0 - 65.5
25.49
923.17
IW-06t
927.14
926.88
27.5 - 42.0
11.25
915.63
L:\DCS\Projects\ENV\60562430_KMS_OU3FCX\500-Deliverables\503-Annual Report\2019 Annual RA Progress Report\Tables\Table 2-2 GwElev_2019.xlsx
1 of 4
-------
Table 2-2A
April 2019 Groundwater Elevation Data
FCX-Statesville Superfund Site OLJ3
Ground
Surface
Top of Casing
Screen
Depth to
Groundwater
Elevation
Elevation
Interval
Groundwater
Elevation
Well IDa
(ft above MSL)
(ft above MSL)
(ft bgs)
(ft below TOC)
(ft above MSL)
North Area Intermediate or Deep
Bedrock Wells
W-Q1i
964.77
964.65
62.5 - 72.5
34.50
930.15
W-Q8i
943.05
943.80
83-93
26.89
916.91
W-09i
964.52
967.21
81 -91
37.40
929.81
W-10i
947.30
946.50
59-69
23.36
923.14
W-16i
965.58
965.07
77-87
39.55
925.52
W-20i
897.70
897.50
84-94
2.38
895.12
W-20d
897.44
897.19
152-162
7.48
889.71
W-26i
925.04
924.86
103-118
10.50
914.36
W-28i
963.04
962.79
73-88
38.61
924.18
W-28d
962.90
962.69
234 - 249
41.49
921.20
W-30i
915.35
915.30
47.5 - 57.5
3.00
912.30
W-31 i
896.66
896.28
34-44
5.96
890.32
W-33i
960.58
960.14
98-108
40.45
919.69
W-33d
960.62
960.24
188 - 203
41.11
919.13
W-88d
911.00
913.11
114-134
14.80
898.31
IW-01
948.81
948.41
76-136
0.50
947.91
IW-03
949.17
949.00
71 -131.5
28.50
920.50
South Area Saprolite or Transition Zone Wells
W-Q3s
961.37
960.90
34-44
29.67
931.23
W-04s
964.92
964.42
34-44
34.28
930.14
W-05s
961.94
961.72
32-42
30.38
931.34
W-24s
920.17
919.62
5-20
2.45
917.17
MW-01
947.44
949.50
41.56 - 51.56
11.87
937.63
MW-02
952.01
954.22
42.52 - 52.52
26.10
928.12
MW-06s
956.52
960.52
45.36 - 55.36
31.39
929.13
MW-07
947.87
950.69
37-47
25.48
925.21
MW-08
961.20
964.20
45.88 - 55.88
22.98
941.22
MW-Q9
955.53
959.42
53.50 - 63.50
12.79
946.63
MW-10
955.34
959.08
50.56 - 60.56
28.99
930.09
South Area Intermediate or Deep
Bedrock Wells
W-02i
963.44
963.31
83-93
31.82
931.49
W-05i
961.94
961.92
56-66
31.90
930.02
W-29i
913.42
913.18
88-98
AW
NC
W-32i
890.89
890.55
112-132
11.70
878.85
W-42i
946.72
946.22
78-88
25.90
920.32
Northern Drainage Pre-Design Investigation Monitoring Wells
W-93-65
898.83
900.97
60-65
5.61
895.36
W-94-15
897.26
900.36
10-15
5.30
895.06
W-95-15
897.14
899.66
10-15
5.10
894.56
Notes:
AW = artesian well
bgs = below ground surface
ft = feet
MSL = mean sea level
NC = not calculated
NS = not surveyed
TOC = top of casing
NA = not accessible
L:\DCS\Projects\ENV\60562430_KMS_OU3FCX\500-Deliverables\503-Annual Report\2019 Annual RA Progress Report\Tables\Table 2-2 GwElev_2019.xlsx
2 of 4
-------
Table 2-2B
October 2019 Groundwater Elevation Data
FCX-Statesville Superfund Site OLJ3
Well IDa
Ground
Surface
Elevation
Top of Casing
Elevation
Screen
Interval
Depth to
Groundwater
Groundwater
Elevation
(ft above MSL)
(ft above MSL)
(ft bgs)
(ft below TOC)
(ft above MSL)
North Area Saprolite or Transition Zone Wells
W-Q1s
96433
963.80
38-48
33.50
930.30
W-Q6S
947.17
947.07
22-37
28.10
918.97
W-07s
948.04
947.96
15-30
28.91
919.05
W-08s
942.60
943.18
20-35
23.78
919.40
W-10s
947.00
946.73
20-35
24.10
922.63
W-10t
947.48
947.16
46-56
25.21
921.95
W-11s
958.50
961.14
25-40
30.02
931.12
W-16s
965.57
965.13
35-50
37.33
927.80
W-17s
965.60
965.31
29.5 - 44.5
35.59
929.72
W-18s
949.95
949.27
22.5 - 37.5
24.01
925.26
W-19s
934.37
937.05
17-27
11.65
925.40
W-20s
896.84
895.42
4-14
1.96
893.46
W-21s
928.48
927.21
10-20
16.11
911.10
W-21t
927.57
927.23
66-81
14.07
913.16
W-30t
913.74
913.38
25-35
0.55
912.83
W-31s
896.99
896.58
5-15
7.18
889.40
W-35s
944.52
944.16
26-36
23.22
920.94
W-35t
942.95
942.65
41 -51
23.81
918.84
W-36s
930.77
930.34
12-22
15.28
915.06
W-36t
929.20
928.86
26-36
13.98
914.88
W-37s
908.59
911.41
4-14
1.35
910.06
W-37t
908.81
911.32
66.0-81.1
AW
NC
W-38s
908.83
911.72
30-40
8.18
903.54
W-38t
909.63
912.65
100-115
5.99
906.66
W-39s
907.99
911.01
30-40
10.76
900.25
W-40s
899.01
902.11
8-18
8.30
893.81
W-40t
899.63
902.75
78-95
8.58
894.17
W-88i
904.93
907.08
15-25
16.10
890.98
URS-MW-01
902.01
905.09
9.11 -14.38
11.76
893.33
URS-MW-Q3
894.86
894.61
3.28 - 8.66
3.96
890.65
MP-17
948.46
948.04
41 -51
28.03
920.01
IW-04t
947.65
947.34
57.5 - 60
28.54
918.80
IW-05t
949.01
948.66
62.0 - 65.5
27.72
920.94
IW-06t
927.14
926.88
27.5 - 42.0
13.89
912.99
L:\DCS\Projects\ENV\60562430_KMS_OU3FCX\500-Deliverables\503-Annual Report\2019 Annual RA Progress Report\Tables\Table 2-2 GwElev_2019.xlsx
3 of 4
-------
Table 2-2B
October 2019 Groundwater Elevation Data
FCX-Statesville Superfund Site OLJ3
Ground
Surface
Top of Casing
Screen
Depth to
Groundwater
Elevation
Elevation
Interval
Groundwater
Elevation
Well IDa
(ft above MSL)
(ft above MSL)
(ft bgs)
(ft below TOC)
(ft above MSL)
North Area Intermediate or Deep
Bedrock Wells
W-Q1i
964.77
964.65
62.5 - 72.5
34.57
930.08
W-Q8i
943.05
943.80
83-93
26.30
917.50
W-09i
964.52
967.21
81 -91
38.54
928.67
W-10i
947.30
946.50
59-69
26.63
919.87
W-16i
965.58
965.07
77-87
40.94
924.13
W-20i
897.70
897.50
84-94
3.98
893.52
W-20d
897.44
897.19
152-162
1.25
895.94
W-26i
925.04
924.86
103-118
12.42
912.44
W-28i
963.04
962.79
73-88
39.99
922.80
W-28d
962.90
962.69
234 - 249
44.04
918.65
W-30i
915.35
915.30
47.5 - 57.5
0.65
914.65
W-31 i
896.66
896.28
34-44
7.05
889.23
W-33i
960.58
960.14
98-108
41.59
918.55
W-33d
960.62
960.24
188 - 203
41.24
919.00
W-88d
911.00
913.11
114-134
16.30
896.81
IW-01
948.81
948.41
76-136
3.62
944.79
IW-03
949.17
949.00
71 -131.5
30.80
918.20
South Area Saprolite or Transition Zone Wells
W-Q3s
961.37
960.90
34-44
29.35
931.55
W-Q4S
964.92
964.42
34-44
33.60
930.82
W-05s
961.94
961.72
32-42
30.69
931.03
W-24s
920.17
919.62
5-20
3.97
915.65
MW-01
947.44
949.50
41.56 - 51.56
22.44
927.06
MW-02
952.01
954.22
42.52 - 52.52
27.91
926.31
MW-Q6S
956.52
960.52
45.36 - 55.36
33.26
927.26
MW-07
947.87
950.69
37-47
27.95
922.74
MW-08
961.20
964.20
45.88 - 55.88
31.71
932.49
MW-09
955.53
959.42
53.50 - 63.50
14.45
944.97
MW-10
955.34
959.08
50.56 - 60.56
12.41
946.67
South Area Intermediate or Deep
Bedrock Wells
W-Q2i
963.44
963.31
83-93
32.44
930.87
W-05i
961.94
961.92
56-66
32.11
929.81
W-29i
913.42
913.18
88-98
AW
NC
W-42i
946.72
946.22
78-88
27.26
918.96
Northern Drainage Pre-Design Investigation Monitoring Wells
W-93-65
898.83
900.97
60-65
6.94
894.03
W-94-15
897.26
900.36
10-15
7.05
893.31
W-94-65
898.03
900.51
60-65
6.55
893.96
W-95-15
897.14
899.66
10-15
6.22
893.44
Notes:
AW = artesian well
bgs = below ground surface
ft = feet
MSL = mean sea level
NC = not calculated
NS = not surveyed
TOC = top of casing
NA = not accessible
L:\DCS\Projects\ENV\60562430_KMS_OU3FCX\500-Deliverables\503-Annual Report\2019 Annual RA Progress Report\Tables\Table 2-2 GwElev_2019.xlsx
4 of 4
-------
Table 3-1
Summary of Chemical Analyses arid Analytical Method References for
Groundwater Sampling
FCX-Statesville Superfund Site OU3
Sample Evaluation Chemical Test/Analyte Parameter Analytical Reference
Method3
DQO
Levelb
Laboratory
Data
Package"
Field Measurements: Conductivity
ASTM Method D1125
Dissolved oxygen (DO)
ASTM Methods D888/Chemetrics Kit, Cat.
Nos. K-7501 (0-1 ppm) and K-7512 (1-12
ppm)d
Oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) SM 2580B/ASTM Method D1498
pH SM 4500H/ASTM Method D1293
Temperature SM 2550B
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Laboratory Analyses: Target Compound List (TCL) VOC
EPA Method 8260B
IV
M:\USCHA3_Data\200\EI Paso\Statesville\4.0 Deliverables\4.13 Annual RA Progress Report\2016\Tables
1 of 2
-------
Table 3-1
Summary of Chemical Analyses arid Analytical Method References for
Groundwater Sampling
N0tes¦ FCX-Statesville Superfund Site OU3
a Sample preservative, when required by the method, will be added to sample containers at the analytical laboratory prior to sampling.
k DQOs (Data Quality Objectives) and QA/QC frequencies per Region 4 SESD Field Branches Quality System and Technical Procedures, which
are available at http://www.epa.gov/region4/sesd/fbqstp/. Level I = Field Screening; Level II = Field Analyses; Level III = Screening Data with
Definitive Confirmation; Level IV = Definitive Data.
c Laboratory data package formats are per the legacy EPNG laboratory program.
^ Volatile organic compound list will be the TCL unless otherwise specified.
e Volatile organic analyte must have a relative response factor of >0.05 for all target compounds, except ketones, which must have an RRF >0.01,
regardless of the analyses method. Analytical method will be most current method (low concentration purge and trap followed by capillary column
GC/MS), unless otherwise specified.
M:\USCHA3_Data\200\EI Paso\Statesville\4.0 Deliverables\4.13 Annual RA Progress Report\2016\Tables
2 of 2
-------
Table 3-2
Groundwater Volatile Organic Compound Analytical Results and
Field Parameter Measurements - 2019
FCX-Statesville Superfund Site OU3
Location
Sample Date
Acetone
Bromo
dichloro
methane
Carbon
disulfide
Carbon
tetra
chloride
Chloroform
1,1-DCE
cis-1,2-
DCE
trans-1,2-
DCE
1,2-DCP
MEK
MIBK
PCE
Toluene
TCE
Freon 11
Freon
113
Vinyl
chloride
Dissolved
Oxygen
ORP
PH
Specific
Conduct-
ivity
Tempera-
ture
(pg/L)
(pg/L)
(pg/L)
(pg/L)
(pg/L)
(pg/L)
(pg/L)
(pg/L)
(pg/L)
(pg/L)
(pg/L)
(pg/L)
(pg/L)
(pg/L)
(pg/L)
(pg/L)
(pg/L)
mg/L
mV
-
|jS/cm
°C
NC 2L:
6,000
0.6
700
0.3
70
350
70
100
0.6
4,000
100 (I)
0.7
600
3
2,000
200,000
0.03
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
North Area Saprolite or Transition Zone Wells
IW-04T
10/17/19
250 U
6.1 U
13 U
8.9 U
7.5 U
8.1 U
38.3
5.5 U
11 u
50 U
25 U
1,580
7.5 U
33.9
13 U
12 U
10 u
5.51
275.3
6.62
226.2
15.7
IW-06T
04/25/19
500 U
12 U
27 U
18 U
15 U
16 U
50.7
11 u
21 U
100 u
50 U
2,620
15 U
30.1 J
25 UJ
24 U
20 U
5.64
222.2
4.99
343.8
15.8
URS-MW-01
10/17/19
10 U
0.24 U
0.53 U
0.36 U
0.30 U
0.32 U
0.28 U
0.22 U
0.43 U
2.0 U
1.0 U
0.22 U
0.30 U
0.35 U
0.50 U
0.48 U
0.41 U
2.32
181.8
5.24
107.6
15.1
URS-MW-03
10/16/19
10 U
0.24 U
0.53 U
0.36 U
0.30 U
0.32 U
0.28 U
0.22 U
0.43 U
2.0 U
1.0 U
0.22 U
0.30 U
0.35 U
0.50 U
0.48 U
0.41 U
1.5
125
5.72
67.8
19.6
W-06S
04/25/19
10 U
0.24 U
0.53 U
0.36 U
0.30 U
0.32 U
0.28 U
0.22 U
0.43 U
2.0 U
3.4 J
1.8
0.30 U
0.35 U
0.50 UJ
0.48 U
0.41 U
2.83
179.5
4.57
193.2
18.0
W-09S
04/25/19
10 U
0.24 U
0.53 U
0.36 U
0.30 U
0.32 U
0.28 U
0.22 U
0.43 U
2.0 U
1.0 U
1.4
0.30 U
0.35 U
0.50 UJ
0.48 U
0.41 U
6.57
142.1
5.56
6.6
17.8
W-10S
04/25/19
10 u
0.24 U
0.53 U
0.36 U
0.30 U
0.32 U
0.28 U
0.22 U
0.43 U
2.0 U
1.0 U
7.8
0.30 U
0.35 U
0.50 U
0.48 U
0.41 U
5.39
226.50
4.10
46.3
16.5
W-10T
04/25/19
10 u
0.24 U
0.53 U
0.36 U
0.30 U
0.32 U
0.28 U
0.22 U
0.43 U
2.0 U
1.0 U
18.6
0.30 U
0.35 U
0.50 U
0.48 U
0.41 U
5.39
130.1
5.03
0.0
16.9
W-17S
04/24/19
25 U
0.61 U
1.3 U
0.89 U
2.6
0.81 U
1.1 J
0.55 U
1.1 U
5.0 U
2.5 U
493 J
0.75 U
0.86 U
1.3 UJ
1.2 U
1.0 U
7.67
193.6
6.20
65.3
18.1
W-19S
04/25/19
10 U
0.24 U
0.53 U
0.36 U
0.30 U
0.32 U
0.28 U
0.22 U
0.43 U
2.0 U
1.0 U
3.9
0.30 U
0.35 U
0.50 U
0.48 U
0.41 U
4.97
211.5
5.31
544.0
15.4
W-20S
04/24/19
10 U
0.24 U
0.53 U
0.36 U
0.30 U
0.32 U
28.2
5.1 J
4.9
2.0 U
1.0 U
226 J
0.30 U
51.6 J
0.50 U
0.48 U
0.41 U
4.98
57.8
4.98
153.6
16.9
W-30T
04/24/19
<100 UJ
2.4 UJ
5.3 UJ
3.6 UJ
3 UJ
3.2 UJ
3.8 J
2.2 UJ
4.3 UJ
20 UJ
10 UJ
709 J
3 UJ
13.1 J
5.0 UJ
4.8 UJ
4.1 UJ
0.89
15.8
6.49
128.4
18.4
W-31S
04/25/19
10 u
0.24 U
0.53 U
0.36 U
0.30 U
0.32 U
0.28 U
0.22 U
0.43 U
2.0 U
1.0 U
0.22 U
0.30 U
0.35 U
0.50 U
0.48 U
0.41 U
5.03
149.5
7.60
107.6
15.7
W-35S
10/17/19
10 u
0.24 U
0.53 U
0.36 U
0.30 U
0.32 U
0.28 U
0.22 U
0.43 U
2.0 U
1.0 U
60.5
0.30 U
0.35 U
0.50 U
0.48 U
0.41 U
5.27
324.5
4.88
236.5
14.6
W-35T
10/17/19
10 u
0.24 U
0.53 U
0.36 U
0.30 U
0.32 U
0.28 U
0.22 U
0.43 U
2.0 U
1.0 U
82.8
0.30 U
0.35 U
0.50 U
0.48 U
0.41 U
6.65
328.6
5.16
51.6
15.3
W-37S
10/16/19
10 u
0.24 U
0.53 U
0.36 U
0.30 U
0.32 U
1.9
0.22 U
0.43 U
2.0 U
1.0 u
99.7
0.30 U
6.7
0.50 U
0.48 U
0.41 U
3.91
231.4
5.43
72.7
14.8
W-37T
10/17/19
10 u
0.24 U
0.53 U
0.36 U
0.30 U
0.32 U
0.28 U
0.22 U
0.43 U
2.0 U
1.0 u
6.4
0.30 U
0.35 U
0.50 U
0.48 U
0.41 U
4.8
262.3
5.35
60.5
15.4
W-38S
04/24/19
<10 UJ
0.24 UJ
0.53 UJ
0.36 UJ
0.30 UJ
0.32 UJ
17.3 J
0.22 UJ
3.6 J
2.0 UJ
1.0 UJ
206 J
0.30 UJ
11.5 J
0.50 UJ
0.48 UJ
0.41 UJ
3.20
163.9
6.20
197.3
16.3
W-38T
04/24/19
<10 UJ
0.24 UJ
0.53 UJ
0.36 UJ
0.30 UJ
0.32 UJ
1.9 J
0.22 UJ
1.1 J
2.0 UJ
1.0 UJ
111 J
0.30 UJ
7.1 J
1.1 J
0.48 UJ
0.41 UJ
2.45
166.2
5.96
160.8
17.7
W-40S
04/24/19
50 U
1.2 U
2.7 U
1.8 U
1.5 U
1.6 U
62.1
6.9
9.3
10 U
5.0 U
367
1.5 U
23.2
2.5 UJ
2.4 U
2 U
2.58
124.8
6.94
216.1
15.8
W-40T
04/24/19
20 U
0.48 U
1.1 U
0.71 U
0.6 U
0.64 U
9
0.8 J
2.4
4.0 U
2.0 U
188
0.6 U
8.7
1.0 UJ
0.96 U
0.82 U
2.46
143.1
6.99
201.6
16.7
W-40T(a)
04/24/19
20 U
0.48 U
1.1 U
0.71 U
0.6 U
0.64 U
9.3
1.6 J
2.2
4.0 U
2.0 U
184
0.6 U
8.9
1.0 UJ
0.96 U
0.82 U
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
North Area Intermediate or Deep Bedrock Wells
IW-01
10/17/19
10 U
0.24 U
0.53 U
0.36 U
0.30 U
1.6 J
0.86 J
0.22 U
0.43 U
2.0 U
1.0 U
98.9 J
0.56 J
5.3 J
0.50 U
0.48 U
0.41 U
0.91
-173.3
11.54
761.0
15.8
IW-01(a>
10/17/19
10 U
0.24 U
0.53 U
0.36 U
0.30 U
0.32 UJ
0.28 U
0.22 U
0.43 U
2.0 U
1.0 U
52.4 J
0.30 U
1.8 J
0.50 U
0.48 U
0.41 U
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
IW-03
10/17/19
10 U
0.24 U
0.53 U
0.36 U
0.30 U
0.32 U
0.79 J
0.22 U
0.43 U
2.0 U
1.0 U
4.7
0.30 U
0.35 U
0.50 U
0.48 U
0.41 U
2.45
293.3
9.25
47.8
16.2
W-09I
10/17/19
10 u
0.24 U
0.53 U
0.37 J
0.30 U
0.32 U
0.28 U
0.22 U
0.43 U
2.0 U
1.0 U
0.22 U
0.30 U
0.35 U
24
0.48 U
0.41 U
5.82
-73.5
7.41
82.8
14.3
W-101
04/25/19
10 u
0.24 U
0.53 U
0.36 U
0.30 U
0.32 U
0.28 U
0.22 U
0.43 U
2.0 U
1.0 u
8.4
0.30 U
0.35 U
2.8
0.50 U
0.48 U
0.41 U
2.46
-30.1
5.99
97.1
17.6
W-161
10/17/19
25 U
0.61 U
1.3 U
2 J
3.4
0.81 U
0.69 U
0.55 U
1.1 U
5.0 U
2.5 U
133
0.75 U
67.2
1.2 U
1.0 U
7.83
78.8
8.26
210.7
17.7
W-201
04/24/19
<25 UJ
0.61 UJ
1.3 UJ
0.89 UJ
0.36 U
0.75 UJ
0.81 UJ
14.1 J
0.55 UJ
3.3 J
5.0 UJ
2.5 UJ
233 J
0.75 UJ
8.4
1.3 UJ
1.2 UJ
1.0 UJ
2.12
-156.2
7.55
188.3
18.5
W-281
10/17/19
10 U
0.24 U
0.53 U
0.30 U
0.32 U
1.3
0.22 U
0.43 U
2.0 U
1.0 U
65.3
0.30 U
5.3
0.50 U
0.48 U
0.41 U
4.10
122.8
11.78
1,394.0
16.8
W-28l(a)
10/17/19
10 U
0.24 U
0.53 U
0.36 U
0.30 U
0.32 U
1.3
0.22 U
0.43 U
2.0 U
1.0 U
66.9
0.30 U
5.5
0.50 U
0.48 U
0.41 U
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
W-28D
04/25/19
12.2 J
0.24 U
1.5 J
0.36 U
0.30 U
0.32 U
0.28 U
0.22 U
0.43 U
2.0 U
1.0 U
0.22 U
0.30 U
0.35 U
0.50 UJ
0.48 U
0.76 J
1.01
-133.9
10.39
326.0
18.4
W-301
04/24/19
10 U
0.24 U
4.4
0.36 U
0.30 U
0.32 U
4.3
0.22 U
1.3
2.0 U
1.0 U
15.5
0.30 U
5
0.50 U
0.48 U
0.41 U
0.98
-320.0
10.35
374.0
17.6
W-311
04/25/19
10 U
0.24 U
2.2
0.36 U
0.30 U
0.32 U
0.28 U
0.22 U
0.43 U
2.0 U
1.0 U
0.22 U
0.30 U
0.35 U
0.50 U
0.48 U
0.41 U
3.58
95.8
10.81
537.8
17.1
W-331
04/25/19
10 U
0.24 U
0.53 U
0.36 U
0.30 U
0.32 U
3.6
0.22 U
0.43 U
2.0 U
1.0 U
2
0.30 U
1.5
0.50 UJ
0.48 U
0.41 U
1.17
-52.2
8.91
111.2
18.4
W-33D
04/24/19
10 U
0.24 U
13.8
0.36 U
0.30 U
0.32 U
0.28 U
0.22 U
0.43 U
2.0 U
1.0 U
2.3
8.1
1.2
0.50 U
0.48 U
0.41 U
2.91
-3.9
10.84
816.0
18.6
South Area Saprolite or Transition Zone Wells
MW-01
04/25/19
10 U
0.24 U
0.53 U
0.36 U
0.87 J
0.32 U
0.81 J
0.22 U
0.43 U
2.0 U
1.0 u
33.3
0.30 U
0.97 J
0.50 UJ
9.5
0.41 U
6.42
198.3
4.93
72.1
19.4
MW-02
04/25/19
10 U
0.24 U
0.53 U
0.36 U
0.30 U
0.32 U
1.5
0.22 U
0.43 U
2.0 U
1.0 u
1.2
0.30 U
0.35 U
0.50 UJ
2.3
0.41 U
5.91
242.1
4.51
53.4
18.5
MW-07
04/25/19
10 U
0.24 U
0.53 U
0.36 U
0.30 U
0.32 U
0.28 U
0.22 U
0.43 U
2.0 U
1.0 u
0.22 U
0.30 U
0.35 U
0.50 UJ
0.48 U
0.41 U
4.71
235.1
4.16
0.2
18.0
MW-08
04/25/19
50 U
1.2 U
2.7 U
1.8 U
1.5 U
1.6 U
1.4 U
1.1 U
2.1 U
10 U
5.0 U
1.1 U
1.5 U
1.7 U
2.5 UJ
2.4 U
2 U
1.58
223.7
6.21
358.7
19.0
MW-09
04/25/19
10 U
0.24 U
0.53 U
0.36 U
0.30 U
0.32 U
0.28 U
0.22 U
0.43 U
2.0 U
1.0 u
0.22 U
0.30 U
0.35 U
0.50 UJ
0.48 U
0.41 U
4.73
200.8
5.41
105.0
18.0
MW-10
04/25/19
10 U
0.24 U
0.53 U
0.36 U
0.30 U
0.32 U
0.28 U
0.22 U
0.43 U
2.0 U
1.0 u
0.22 U
0.30 U
0.35 U
0.50 UJ
0.48 U
0.41 U
6.81
225.5
4.70
46.2
19.0
W-04S
04/25/19
10 U
0.24 U
0.53 U
0.36 U
0.30 U
0.32 U
0.28 U
0.22 U
0.43 U
2.0 U
1.0 u
0.22 U
0.30 U
0.35 U
0.50 UJ
0.48 U
0.41 U
6.29
203.6
5.09
39.2
18.0
L:\DCS\Projects\ENV\60562430_KMS_OU3FCX\500-Deliverables\503-Annual Report\2019 Annual RA Progress Report\Tables\Table 3-2 VocslnGw-2019 (20200122).xlsx
1 of 3
-------
Table 3-2
Groundwater Volatile Organic Compound Analytical Results and
Field Parameter Measurements - 2019
FCX-Statesville Superfund Site OU3
Location
Sample Date
Acetone
Bromo
dichloro
methane
Carbon
disulfide
Carbon
tetra
chloride
Chloroform
1,1-DCE
cis-1,2-
DCE
trans-1,2-
DCE
1,2-DCP
MEK
MIBK
PCE
Toluene
TCE
Freon 11
Freon
113
Vinyl
chloride
Dissolved
Oxygen
ORP
PH
Specific
Conduct-
ivity
Tempera-
ture
(pg/L)
(pg/L)
(pg/L)
(pg/L)
(pg/L)
(pg/L)
(pg/L)
(pg/L)
(pg/L)
(pg/L)
(pg/L)
(pg/L)
(pg/L)
(pg/L)
(pg/L)
(pg/L)
(pg/L)
mg/L
mV
-
|jS/cm
°C
NC 2L:
6,000
0.6
700
0.3
70
350
70
100
0.6
4,000
100 (I)
0.7
600
3
2,000
200,000
0.03
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Northern Drainage Pre-Design Investigation Monitoring Wells
W-89-25
04/24/19
25 U
0.61 U
1.3 UJ
0.89 U
0.75 U
0.81 UJ
9.6
0.55 U
6.2
5.0 U
2.5 U
176
0.75 U
13
1.3 UJ
1.2 U
1.0 u
1.30
169.8
6.14
305.4
17.4
W-90-29
04/24/19
20 U
0.48 U
1.1 u
0.71 U
0.6 U
0.64 U
6.5
0.44 U
3.3
4.0 U
2.0 U
111
0.6 U
8.7
1.0 UJ
0.96 U
0.82 U
2.76
155.8
7.41
276.9
12.8
W-93-65
04/24/19
20 U
0.48 U
1.1 u
0.71 U
0.6 U
0.64 U
7.9
0.61 J
3
4.0 U
2.0 U
162
0.6 U
8.3
1.0 UJ
0.96 U
0.82 U
3.35
143.1
6.78
221.7
16.5
W-94-65
04/25/19
10 U
0.24 U
0.53 U
0.36 U
0.30 U
0.32 U
0.28 U
0.22 U
0.43 U
2.0 U
1.0 U
0.22 U
0.30 U
0.35 U
0.50 UJ
0.48 U
0.41 U
4.60
174.0
5.81
106.1
16.2
Inactive Liquid Injection Wells
W-44
10/16/19
50 U
1.2 U
2.7 U
1.8 U
1.5 U
1.6 U
59.8
1.1 U
2.1 U
10 U
5.0 U
283
1.5 U
17.5
2.5 U
2.4 U
2 U
5.93
109.4
5.97
188.2
18.4
W-48
10/16/19
100 U
2.4 U
5.3 U
3.6 U
3 U
3.2 U
102
2.2 U
4.3 U
20 U
10 U
633
3 U
20.3
5.0 U
4.8 U
4.1 U
6.11
128.1
5.78
266.2
17.2
W-51
10/16/19
500 U
12 U
27 U
18 U
15 U
16 U
54.8
11 U
21 U
100 U
50 U
2,920
15 U
44.8 J
25 U
24 U
20 U
4.46
141.9
5.65
340.8
16.7
W-55
10/16/19
10 U
0.24 U
0.53 U
0.36 U
0.30 U
0.32 U
1.8
0.22 U
0.43 U
2.0 U
1.0 U
19.3
0.30 U
0.83 J
0.50 U
0.48 U
0.41 U
6.62
155.5
4.99
175.2
16.7
W-57
10/16/19
250 U
6.1 U
13 U
8.9 U
7.5 U
8.1 U
48.4
5.5 U
11 U
50 U
25 U
1,300
7.5 U
23.3 J
13 U
12 U
10 U
4.32
169.6
5.65
359.7
16.7
W-59
10/16/19
25 U
0.61 U
1.3 U
0.89 U
0.75 U
0.81 U
2.8
0.55 U
1.1 U
5.0 U
2.5 U
122
0.75 U
1.7 J
1.3 U
1.2 U
1.0 U
5.29
167.6
5.55
273.2
16.1
W-61
10/16/19
25 U
0.61 U
1.3 U
0.89 U
0.75 U
0.81 U
6.9
0.55 U
1.1 U
5.0 U
2.5 U
175
0.75 U
3.0
1.3 U
1.2 U
1.0 U
4.68
174.4
5.39
297.5
16.6
W-63
10/16/19
10 U
0.24 U
0.53 U
0.36 U
0.30 U
0.32 U
4.2
0.22 U
0.43 U
2.0 U
1.0 U
11.5
0.30 U
0.92 J
0.50 U
0.48 U
0.41 U
6.01
200.2
5.05
748
16.7
W-67
10/16/19
20 U
0.48 U
1.1 U
0.71 U
0.6 U
0.64 U
0.55 U
0.44 U
0.85 U
4.0 U
2.0 U
101
0.6 U
0.7 J
1.0 U
0.96 U
0.82 U
6.43
162.1
5.42
58.7
16.4
W-72
10/16/19
50 U
1.2 U
2.7 U
1.8 U
1.5 U
5.6
1.4 U
1.1 U
2.1 U
10 U
5.0 U
490
1.5 U
2.5 J
2.5 U
2.4 U
2 U
5.44
179.4
5.61
135.1
17.1
W-79
10/16/19
100 U
2.4 U
5.3 U
3.6 U
3 U
3.2 U
2.8 U
2.2 U
4.3 U
20 U
10 U
638
3 U
3.5 U
5.0 U
4.8 U
4.1 U
6.2
174.7
5.07
40
17.1
Source Area Concentric Design Wells
EW-01 SW-01
10/17/19
10 U
0.24 U
0.53 U
0.36 U
0.30 U
0.32 U
0.85 J
0.22 U
0.43 U
2.0 U
1.0 U
14.1
0.30 U
0.48 J
0.50 U
0.48 U
0.41 U
6.91
89.9
6.48
111.2
17.0
EW-02 SW-02
10/16/19
10 U
0.24 U
0.53 U
0.36 U
0.30 U
0.32 U
0.28 U
0.22 U
0.43 U
2.0 U
1.0 U
81.5
0.30 U
0.41 J
0.50 U
0.48 U
0.41 U
7.04
367.0
5.98
27.5
18.9
EW-03
10/17/19
10 U
0.24 U
0.53 U
0.36 U
0.97 J
0.32 U
1.7
0.22 U
0.43 U
2.0 U
1.0 U
44.5
0.30 U
1.4
3.5
0.48 U
0.41 U
5.31
74.2
7.43
78.5
18.0
EW-04 SW-04
04/24/19
50 U
1.2 U
2.7 U
1.8 U
1.5 U
1.6 U
1.4 U
1.1 U
2.1 U
10 U
5.0 U
108
1.5 U
1.7 U
2.5 UJ
2.4 U
2 U
7.89
203.7
5.65
326.8
18.2
EW-04 SW-04(a)
04/24/19
50 U
1.2 U
2.7 U
1.8 U
1.5 U
1.6 U
1.4 U
1.1 U
2.1 U
10 U
5.0 U
112
1.5 U
1.7 U
2.5 UJ
2.4 U
2 U
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
EW-05
10/16/19
10 U
0.24 U
0.53 U
0.36 U
0.30 U
0.32 U
0.28 U
0.22 U
0.43 U
2.0 U
1.0 U
3.9
0.30 U
0.35 U
0.50 U
0.48 U
0.41 U
6.76
313.2
5.58
25.1
19.2
EW-07
10/17/19
10 U
0.24 U
0.53 U
0.36 U
0.30 U
0.32 U
0.28 U
0.22 U
0.43 U
2.0 U
1.0 U
0.85 J
0.30 U
0.35 U
0.50 U
0.48 U
0.41 U
0.97
240.0
6.04
77.2
18.8
EW-08
10/17/19
651
6.1 U
13 U
9.4 J
41.9
8.1 U
200
5.5 U
11 U
2,960
25 U
2,130
7.5 U
49.1
13 U
12 U
10 U
3.26
117.6
5.48
107.6
17.9
EW-12
10/17/19
10 U
0.24 U
0.53 U
0.36 U
0.30 U
0.32 U
4.8
0.22 U
0.43 U
2.0 U
1.0 U
80.5
0.30 U
3.1
0.50 U
0.48 U
0.41 U
2.20
112.0
6.80
295.3
16.1
EW-13
10/17/19
50 U
1.2 U
2.7 U
1.8 U
1.5 U
1.6 U
7.8
1.1 U
2.1 U
10 U
5.0 U
3,280
1.5 U
4.4 J
2.5 U
2.4 U
2 U
5.99
92.1
8.81
411.2
16.2
EW-14
10/17/19
10 U
0.24 U
0.53 U
0.36 U
0.30 U
0.32 U
0.28 U
0.22 U
0.43 U
2.0 U
1.0 U
13.3
0.30 U
0.35 U
0.50 U
0.48 U
0.41 U
6.61
111.9
6.28
126.8
17.5
EW-16
04/24/19
25 U
0.61 U
1.3 U
0.89 U
0.75 U
0.81 U
1.2 J
0.55 U
1.1 U
5.0 U
2.5 U
147
0.75 U
0.86 U
1.3 UJ
1.2 U
1.0 U
6.82
230.4
4.66
210.9
18.3
EW-18
04/24/19
20 U
0.48 U
1.1 U
0.71 U
0.6 U
0.64 U
0.55 U
0.44 U
0.85 U
4.0 U
2.0 U
109
0.6 U
0.69 U
1.0 UJ
0.96 U
0.82 U
12.67
219.6
4.30
535.9
17.9
EW-19
04/24/19
50 U
1.2 U
2.7 U
1.8 U
1.5 U
5.2
1.4 U
1.1 U
2.1 U
10 U
5.0 U
307
1.5 U
1.7 J
2.5 UJ
2.4 U
2 U
7.34
227.9
4.67
60.2
18.0
EW-20
04/24/19
50 U
1.2 U
2.7 U
1.8 U
1.6 J
1.6 U
1.4 U
1.1 U
2.1 U
10 U
5.0 U
794
1.5 U
2.9 J
2.5 UJ
2.4 U
2 U
7.45
233.1
4.24
43.9
18.2
EW-24
10/17/19
200 U
4.8 U
11 U
7.1 U
25.3
6.4 U
101
4.4 U
8.5 U
40 U
20 U
2,100
6.0 U
42.7
10 U
9.6 U
8.2 U
3.74
106.3
6.15
140.0
18.0
MP-01
10/16/19
20 U
0.48 U
1.1 U
0.71 U
1.2 J
4.9
5.7
0.44 U
0.85 U
4.0 U
2.0 U
115
0.6 U
1.8 J
1.0 U
0.96 U
0.82 U
4.60
347.0
5.98
123.7
19.0
MP-03
10/16/19
10 U
0.24 U
0.53 U
0.94 J
0.99 J
9.5
0.28 U
0.22 U
0.43 U
2.0 U
1.0 U
51.4
0.30 U
0.88 J
0.50 U
0.48 U
0.41 U
5.48
245.8
4.88
23.5
18.8
MP-04 EW-26
10/17/19
10 U
2.7
0.53 U
12.5
29.9
0.32 U
140
0.89 J
6.5
2.0 U
1.0 U
2,130 J
0.30 U
48.9
3.2
0.48 U
0.41 U
5.35
115.9
5.85
118.2
18.0
MP-15
10/17/19
10 U
0.24 U
0.53 U
0.36 U
0.53 J
0.32 U
1.3
0.22 U
0.43 U
2.0 U
1.0 U
18.9
0.30 U
0.84 J
0.50 U
0.48 U
0.41 U
6.53
95.8
6.27
109.5
17.6
L:\DCS\Projects\ENV\60562430_KMS_OU3FCX\500-Deliverables\503-Annual Report\2019 Annual RA Progress Report\Tables\Table 3-2 VocslnGw-2019 (20200122).xlsx
2 of 3
-------
Table 3-2
Groundwater Volatile Organic Compound Analytical Results and
Field Parameter Measurements - 2019
FCX-Statesville Superfund Site OU3
Notes:
(a) = field duplicate
°C = degrees Celsius
pS/cm = microsiemens per centimeter
pg/L = micrograms per liter
DC A = dichloroethane
DCB = dichlorobenzene
DCE = dichloroethene
DCP = 1,2-dichloropropane
Freon 11 = trichlorofluoromethane
Freon 12 = dichlorofluoromethane
Freon 113 = 1,1,2-trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane
I = interim maximum allowable concentration established under 15A NCAC 02L .0202
J = estimated concentration
mg/L = milligrams per liter
MIBK = methyl Isobutyl ketone (4-methyl-2-pentanone)
mV = millivolts
NA = not applicable
NC 2L = North Carolina groundwater quality standard
ORP = oxidation reduction potential
PCE = tetrachloroethene
TCE = trichloroethene
U = not detected at specified detection limit
UJ = not detected and the limit is estimated
USEPA = United States Environmental Protection Agency
This table presents the results of all volatile organic compounds detected in groundwater samples that were collected in 2019 at the Site. Sample results have been qualified in accordance with the Quality Assurance Project Plan for FCX (Statesville) Superfund Site (OU3) (URS,
April 2009). The data review process was modeled after USEPA Region 4 Data Validation guidance.
North Carolina groundwater quality standards for the protection of the groundwater are specified in 15A NCAC 2L .0200. A bold border with shading indicates the concentration is greater than the standard.
L:\DCS\Projects\EN\A60562430_KMS_OU3FCX\500-Deliverables\503-Annual Report\2019 Annual RA Progress Report\Tables\Table 3-2 VocslnGw-2019 (20200122).xlsx
3 of 3
-------
Table 3-3
Groundwater Volatile Organic Compound Analytical Results - Row N-1 Wells
FCX-Statesville Superfund Site OU3
Well ID
Sample
Date
PCE
(M9/L)
Reduction
in PCE
(Percent)1
TCE
ftjg/L)
cis-1,2-
DCE
(M9/L)
Vinyl
Chloride
(M9/L)
1,1-DCE
ftjg/L)
1,2-DCP
ftjg/L)
Carbon
Tetrachloride
ftjg/L)
Chloro-
form
(M9/L)
NC 2L:
0.7
NA
3
70
0.03
350
0.6
0.3
70
W-44
12/15/07
2,000
-
72
110
2 U
3 J
7 J
7 J
8 J
10/24/17
567
71.7%
31.1
94
4.1 U
3.2 U
4.3 U
3.6 U
3 U
04/23/18
560
72.0%
25.4
86.7
4.1 U
3.2 U
4.3 U
3.6 U
3 U
10/16/19
283
85.9%
17.5
59.8
2 U
1.6 U
2.1 U
1.8 U
1.5 U
W-48
12/13/07
2,900
-
190
830
5 U
4 U
9 J
6 J
8 J
10/24/17
1,220
57.9%
32.2
167
8.2 U
6.4 U
8.5 U
7.1 U
6 U
04/23/18
1,100
62.1%
22.5
157
8.2 U
6.4 U
8.5 U
7.1 U
6 U
10/16/19
633
78.2%
20.3
102
4.1 U
3.2 U
4.3 U
3.6 U
3 U
W-51
12/17/07
3,300
-
59
62
5 U
4 U
13 J
5 U
29
10/24/17
4,440
-34.5%
64.2
70.2
20 U
16 U
21 U
18 U
16.2 J
04/23/18
3,890
-17.9%
45.8 J
62.2
20 U
17 U
21 U
18 U
15 U
10/16/19
2,920
11.5%
44.8 J
54.8
20 U
16 U
21 U
18 U
15 U
W-55
12/17/07
2,300
-
46
62
3 U
2 U
5 J
3 U
5 J
10/24/17
171
92.6%
4.2
11.4
1 U
0.81 U
1.1 U
0.89 U
0.75 U
04/23/18
133
94.2%
3.5
11
0.82 U
0.64 U
0.85 U
0.71 U
0.6 U
10/16/19
19.3
99.2%
0.83 J
1.8
0.41 U
0.32 U
0.43 U
0.36 U
0.3 U
W-57
12/12/07
16,000
-
120
170
20 U
16 U
20 U
20 U
16 U
10/24/17
3,350
79.1%
43.2 J
75.9
20 U
16 U
21 U
18 U
15 U
10/16/19
1,300
91.9%
23.3 J
48.4
10 U
8.1 U
11 U
8.9 U
7.5 U
W-59
12/18/07
29,000
-
560
970
20 U
16 U
61 J
20 U
26 J
10/24/17
132
99.5%
1.3 J
1.6 J
1 U
0.81 U
1.1 U
0.89 U
0.75 U
04/23/18
805
97.2%
7.5 J
13.5 J
4.1 UJ
3.2 UJ
4.3 UJ
3.6 UJ
3 UJ
10/16/19
122
99.6%
1.7 J
2.8
1 U
0.81 U
1.1 U
0.89 U
0.75 U
W-61
12/11/07
25,000
-
590
1,300
20 U
16 U
170
20 U
28 J
10/24/17
3,610
85.6%
41.6 J
86.5
20 U
16 U
21 U
18 U
15 U
04/23/18
2,170
91.3%
19.2 J
72.4
10 U
8.1 U
11 U
8.9 U
7.5 U
10/16/19
175
99.3%
3
6.9
1 U
0.81 U
1.1 U
0.89 U
0.75 U
W-63
12/16/07
30,000
-
240
520
20 U
16 U
68 J
20 U
27 J
10/24/17
146
99.5%
2.3
19
0.82 U
0.64 U
5.7
0.71 U
1.6 J
04/23/18
1,420
95.3%
1.2
9.1
0.41 U
0.32 U
2.4
0.36 U
0.87 J
10/16/19
11.5
100.0%
0.92 J
4.2
0.41 U
0.32 U
0.43 U
0.36 U
0.3 U
W-67
12/15/07
6,800
-
62
82
10 U
8 U
16 J
10 U
12 J
10/24/17
17
99.8%
0.35 U
0.28 U
0.41 U
0.32 U
0.43 U
0.36 U
0.3 U
04/23/18
7.1
99.9%
0.35 U
0.28 U
0.41 U
0.32 U
0.43 U
0.36 U
3 U
10/16/19
101
98.5%
0.70 J
0.55 U
0.82 U
0.64 U
0.85 U
0.71 U
0.6 U
W-72
12/15/07
1,200
-
8
4 J
1 U
14
1 U
2 J
3 J
10/24/17
891
25.8%
5.1 J
3.2 J
4.1 U
3.9 J
4.3 U
3.6 U
3 U
10/16/19
490
59.2%
2.5 J
1.4 U
2 U
5.6
2.1 U
1.8 U
1.5 U
W-79
12/16/07
1,100
-
5
4 J
1 U
6
1 U
1 U
2 J
10/24/17
1,100
0.0%
1.6
0.3 J
0.41 U
2.8
0.43 U
0.36 U
1
04/23/18
930
15.5%
151
2.8 U
4.1 U
3.2 U
4.3 U
3.6 U
3 U
10/16/19
638
42.0%
3.5 U
2.8 U
4.1 U
3.2 U
4.3 U
3.6 U
3 U
Notes:
1 = Reduction in PCE calculated from original analysis in 2007
pg/L = micrograms per liter
DCE = dichloroethene
DCP = 1,2-dichloropropane
J = estimated concentration
NA = not applicable
NC 2L = North Carolina groundwater quality standard
PCE = tetrachloroethene
TCE = trichloroethene
U = not detected at specified detection limit
UJ = not detected and the limit is estimated
Sample results have been qualified in accordance with the Quality Assurance Project Plan for FCX (Statesville) Superfund Site (OU3) (URS, April
2009). The data review process was modeled after US EPA Region 4 Data Validation guidance.
North Carolina groundwater quality standards for the protection of the groundwater are specified in 15A NCAC 2L .0200. A bold border with shading
indicates the concentration is greater than the standard.
L:\DCS\Projects\ENV\60562430_KMS_OU3FCXi500-Deliverables\503-Annual Report\2019 Annual RA Progress Report\Tables\Table 3-3 N-1 Wells (20200122).xlsx Page 1 of 1
-------
Figures
-------
>rthmont v
ST1 Ch
•J^Substa
ly Trinity/
Qft*
ifmory.
BURLINGTON
INDUSTRIES
PROPERTY J <0<.
"THE SITE" I- \ '
t I !,' g£E2l
FARMERS
T COOPERATIVE
EXCHANGE
''^f sc'h PROPERTY
r J
2000
4000
SCALE, FEET
SOURCE:
USGS 7.5—MINUTE TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OF THE
STATESVILLE WEST. NORTH CAROLINA QUADRANGLE
DATED 2002.
Proj ect M an agem ent Initials: Designer:MPS Checked: CK Approved: CF
FCX SUPERFUND SITE
EL PASO NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LOCATION MAP AECOM
STATESVILLE. NORTH CAROLINA bl 1 L LUOA 1IUN MAH J-l—
Project No.: 60611584 Date: 2020-01-17 Figure: 1-1
-------
FERNDALE
PHOENIX ST,
PHOENIX ST,
FORMER BURLINGTON
industries
TEXTILE PLANTl
OU3
(CONCEPTUAL)
PCX
BUILDING
WOODLAWN DR,
Filename: \\172.24.168.25\MORRISVILLE\DCS\PROJECTS\ENV\60562430_KMS_OU3FCX\500-DELIVERABLES\503-ANN UAL REPORT\2019 ANNUAL RA PROGRESS REPORT\FIGURES\FIGURE 1-2- OPERABLE
UN ITS. DWG
Project Management Initials: Designer: MPS Checked: CK Approved: CF
NOTE
OU—3 is defined as the extent of the chlorinated solvent
plume which by definition is variable, and extends beyond the
property boundary.
FCX SUPERFUND SITE
EL PASO NATURAL GAS CORPORATION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
Project No.: 60611584 Date: 2020-01-17
FCX SUPERFUND SITE
OPERABLE UNITS
200 300
SCALE, FEET
400
A=COM
Figure: 1-2
-------
Filename: \\172.24.168.25\MORRISVILLE\DCS\PROJECTS\ENV\60562430_KMS_OU3FCX\500-DELIVERABLES\503-ANN UAL REPORT\2019 ANNUAL RA PROGRESS REPORT\FIGURES\FIGURE2-1 - CROSS
SECTION A-A_REV1.DWG
Project Management Initials: Designer: MPS Checked: SD Approved: CK
North
A
W—20d/i/s
"-40
w-4ot/s
W-39s
V V
MW-jSt/s
W-37t/s
%
W—30i/t
iw-et
V
EW-15
9
W-61
9-
MP-13/EW-13"
EW-4
-9-
MP-06/EW-22
South
A'
W-5i/
W—24s W-2
W-32
LEGEND
SHALLOW - SAPROLITE WELL
TRANSITION ZONE WELL ABOVE FRACTURED ROCK
INTERMEDIATE ZONE WELL IN FRACTURED BEDROCK
DEEP BEDROCK WELL IN COMPETENT BEDROCK
WELL LOCATION
SCREEN INTERVAL
TOTAL DEPTH OF BORE HOLE
MEAN SEA LEVEL
ROSS SECTION A-A' iuALE| FEET
CROSS SECTION LOCATIONS
SCALE: 1 **=600'
Jb. WELL
^ EW - SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION WELL,
MP - MONITORING PROBE FOR SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION/AIR SPARGE WELL,
IW, MW OR W - MONITORING WELL FOR GROUNDWATER
SAPROLITE (RED/BROWN SILT/CLAY, SAND)
TRANSITION ZONE (GRAY, TAN, GREEN SILT/SAND/GRAVEL/ROCK FRAGMENTS)
BEDROCK
GEOLOGIC CONTACT
? APPROXIMATE GROUNDWATER PHREATIC SURFACE OCTOBER 2019
SEEP AREA
FACILITY
BUILDING
FCX SUPERFUND SITE
EL PASO NATURAL GAS CORPORATION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
Project No.: 60611584 Date: 2020-01-17
CROSS SECTION A-A1
AECOM
Figure: 2-1
-------
Filename: \\172.24.168.25\MORRISVILLE\DCS\PROJECTS\ENV\60562430_KMS_OU3FCX\500-DELIVERABLES\503-ANNUAL REPORT\2019 ANNUAL RAPROGRESSREPORT\FIGURES\FIGURE2-2-WELL
LOCATION 1QF2.DWG
Project Management Initials: Designer: MPS Checked: CK Approved: CF
FCX SUPERFUND SITE
EL PASO NATURAL GAS CORPORATION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
Project No.: 60611584 Date: 2020-01-17
MONITORING AND REMEDIATION
WELL LOCATIONS
(PART 1 of 2)
250 375 500
AECOM
Figure: 2-2
SCALE, FEET
-------
Filename: \\172.24.168.25\MORRISVILLE\DCS\PROJECTS\ENV\60562430_KMS_OU3FCX\500-DELIVERABLES\503-ANNUAL REPORT\2019 ANNUAL RA PROGRESS REPORT\FIGURES\FIGURE2-3- MW
LOCATION 2QF2.DWG
Project Management Initials: Designer: MPS Checked: CK Approved: CF
NORTHERN DRAINAGE INSET MAP
LEGEND
INTERMEDIATE BEDROCK MONITORING WELL
©© INTERMEDIATE/DEEP BEDROCK MONITORING WELL
0© SAPROLITE MONITORING WELL
®0 TRANSITION MONITORING WELL
H CONCENTRIC DESIGN SAPROLITE WELL
USED FOR SVE AND/OR AIR SPARGING
m DEDICATED AIR SPARGE WELL
® (SAPROLITE/TRANSITION)
ffl DEDICATED SVE WELL (SAPROLITE)
CONCENTRIC DESIGN SAPROLITE WELL
USED FOR MONITORING
INACTIVE LIQUID INJECTION WELL
0© ABANDONED MONITORING WELL
SOURCE AREA INSET MAP
Notes:
1. Inset map locations are shown on Figure 2-2.
2. SVE = Soil Vapor Extraction
FCX SUPERFUND SITE
EL PASO NATURAL GAS CORPORATION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
Project No.: 60611584 Date: 2020-01-17
MONITORING AND REMEDIATION
WELL LOCATIONS
(PART 2 of 2)
60
90
120
AECOM
Figure: 2-3
SCALE, FEET
-------
Project Management Initials: Designer: MPS Checked: CK Approved: CF
FCX SUPERFUND SITE
EL PASO NATURAL GAS CORPORATION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
Project No.: 60611584 Date: 2020-01-07
GROUNDWATER CONTOUR MAP
APRIL 2019
SAPROLITE ZONE
200 300 400
A5COM
Figure: 2-4a
SCALE, FEET
-------
Filename: L:\DCS\PROJECTS\ENV\60562430_KMS_OU3FCX\500-DELIVERABLES\503-ANNUAL REPORT\2019 ANNUAL RA PROGRESS REPORT\FIGURES\FIGURE 2-4B GW CONTOUR SHALLOW OCT 2019_DRAFT_ERL.DWG
Project Management Initials:
Checked: CK Approved: CF
FERNDAL.E
PHOENIX\ ST
0 SAPROUTE MONITORING WELL
889.40 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
(925.40) GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
(NOT USED FOR CONTOURING)
GROUNDWATER EQUIPOTENTIAL ISOCONTOUR
NA NOT AVAILABLE
•4 INFERRED GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION
Notes
Source area concentric construction
saprolite wells are not shown and were
not used for contouring.
FCX SUPERFUND SITE
EL PASO NATURAL GAS CORPORATION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
Project No.: 60611584 Date: 2020-01-14
GROUNDWATER CONTOUR MAP
OCTOBER 2019
SAPROLITE ZONE
200 300
SCALE, FEET
400
A=COM
Figure: 2-4b
-------
Project Management Initials: Designer: MPS
Checked: CK Approved: CF
fERNDAtp
PHOENIX\ ST
!7t
CTESIAN
LEGEND
e TRANSITION ZONE MONITORING WELL
AW ARTISIAN WELL
895.36 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
GROUNDWATER EQUIPOTENTIAL ISOCONTOUR
NA NOT AVAILABLE
* INFERRED GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION
FCX SUPERFUND SITE
EL PASO NATURAL GAS CORPORATION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
Project No.: 60611578 Date: 2020-01-14
GROUNDWATER CONTOUR MAP
April 2019
TRANSITION ZONE
200 300
SCALE, FEET
400
AECOM
Figure: 2-5a
-------
Filename: L:\DCS\PROJECTS\ENV\60562430_KMS_OU3FCX\500-DELIVERABLES\503-ANNUAL REPORT\2019 ANNUAL RA PROGRESS REPORT\FIGURES\FIGURE 2-5B GW CONTOUR TRANSITION OCTOBER 2019_DRAFT_ERL.DWG
i i I I i i i i k luh ,—-fl ¦ \tJ IM9 K J '
Project Management Initials: Designer: MPS
Checked: CK Approved: CF
FERNDAL.E
PH0ENIX\ ST"
LEGEND
® TRANSITION ZONE MONITORING WELL
AW ARTISIAN WELL
890.98 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
GROUNDWATER EQUIPOTENTIAL ISOCONTOUR
NA NOT AVAILABLE
INFERRED GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION
FCX SUPERFUND SITE
EL PASO NATURAL GAS CORPORATION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
Project No.: 60611584 Date: 2020-01-14
GROUNDWATER CONTOUR MAP
October 2019
TRANSITION ZONE
200 300
SCALE, FEET
400
AECOM
Figure: 2-5b
-------
Project Management Initials: Designer: MPS
Checked: CK Approved: CF
ferndalE
HHOENIX\ ST
LEGEND
09 INTERMEDIATE OR DEEP
BEDROCK MONITORING WELL
912.30 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
(919.13) GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
(NOT USED FOR CONTOURING)
AW ARTISIAN WELL
GROUNDWATER EQUIPOTENTIAL ISOCONTOUR
NA NOT AVAILABLE
•4 INFERRED GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION
FCX SUPERFUND SITE
EL PASO NATURAL GAS CORPORATION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
Project No.: 60611584 Date: 2020-01-15
GROUNDWATER CONTOUR MAP
APRIL 2019
BEDROCK ZONE
200 300
SCALE, FEET
400
fiECOM
Figure: 2-6a
-------
Project Management Initials: Designer: MPS
Checked: CK Approved: CF
ferndalE
PHOENIX\ ST,
mxiLa@_rr
<{895.44)
WOODLAWN DR,
LEGEND
INTERMEDIATE OR DEEP
BEDROCK MONITORING WELL
914.65 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
(944.79) GROUNDWATER ELEVATION
(NOT USED FOR CONTOURING)
GROUNDWATER EQUIPOTENTIAL ISOCONTOUR
NA NOT AVAILABLE
•4 INFERRED GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION
FCX SUPERFUND SITE
EL PASO NATURAL GAS CORPORATION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
Project No.: 60611584 Date: 2020-01-15
GROUNDWATER CONTOUR MAP
OCTOBER 2019
BEDROCK ZONE
200 300
SCALE, FEET
400
fiECOM
Figure: 2-6b
-------
Filename: M:\DCS\PROJECTS\ENV\60562430_KMS_OU3FCX\500-DELIVERABLES\503-ANNUAL REPORT\2019 ANNUAL RA PROGRESS REPORT\FIGURES\FIGURE 3-1 PCE CONCENTRATIONS SHALLOW
2019_DRAFT. DWG
Project Management Initials: Designer: MPS
Checked: CK Approved: CF
ferndalE
PH0ENIX\ ST.
IHJlasO
mwt
WOODLAWN DR,
LEGEND
SAPROUTE MONITORING WELL
CONCENTRIC DESIGN SAPROUTE WELL
USED FOR SVE AND/OR AIR SPARGING
CONCENTRIC DESIGN SAPROUTE WELL
USED FOR MONITORING
NOT SAMPLED
ESTIMATED VALUE
CONSTITUENT NOT DETECTED AT
USTED CONCENTRATION
NOT USED FOR CONTOURING
PCE CONCENTRATION ISOCONTOUR
(MICROGRAMS PER UTER)
DASHED WHERE INFERRED
DATA REPRESENTS MOST RECENT SAMPLE
RESULTS IN 2019.
FCX SUPERFUND SITE
EL PASO NATURAL GAS CORPORATION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
Project No.: 60611584 Date: 2020-01-15
PCE CONCENTRATIONS IN GROUNDWATER
SAPROLITE WELLS
APRIL-OCTOBER 2019
200 300
SCALE, FEET
400
AECOM
Figure: 3-1
-------
Filename: M:\DCS\PROJECTS\ENV\60562430_KMS_OU3FCX\500-DELIVERABLES\503-ANNUAL REPORT\2019 ANNUAL RA PROGRESS REPORT\FIGURES\FIGURE 3-2 PCE CONCENTRATIONS TRANSITION
2019_DRAFT. DWG
Project Management Initials: Designer: MPS
Checked: CK Approved: CF
Iferndale
PH0ENIX\ ST,
WOODLAWN DR,
LEGEND
TRANSITION ZONE MONITORING WELL
NS NOT SAMPLED
J ESTIMATED VALUE
<# CONSTITUENT NOT DETECTED AT
LISTED CONCENTRATION
PCE CONCENTRATION ISOCONTOUR
(MICROGRAMS PER UTER)
DASHED WHERE INFERRED
DATA REPRESENTS MOST RECENT SAMPLE
RESULTS IN 2019.
FCX SUPERFUND SITE
EL PASO NATURAL GAS CORPORATION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
Project No.: 60611584 Date: 2020-01-15
PCE CONCENTRATIONS IN GROUNDWATER
TRANSITION ZONE WELLS
APRIL-OCTOBER 2019
200 300
SCALE, FEET
400
A=COM
Figure: 3-2
-------
Filename: M:\DCS\PROJECTS\ENV\60562430_KMS_OU3FCX\500-DELIVERABLES\503-ANNUAL REPORT\2019 ANNUAL RA PROGRESS REPORT\FIGURES\FIGURE 3-3 PCE CONCENTRATIONS BEDROCK
2019_D RAFT. DWG
Project Management Initials: Designer: MPS
Checked: CK Approved: CF
ILLER st,
MILLER ST,
ferndale
PHOENIXj ST,
WOODLAWN DR.
LEGEND
9 ® INTERMEDIATE MONITORING WELL
® ® DEEP BEDROCK MONITORING WELL
NS NOT SAMPLED
J ESTIMATED VALUE
<# CONSTITUENT NOT DETECTED AT
USTED CONCENTRATION
(#) NOT USED FOR CONTOURING
PCE CONCENTRATION ISOCONTOUR
(MICROGRAMS PER LITER)
DASHED WHERE INFERRED
DATA REPRESENTS MOST RECENT SAMPLE
RESULTS IN 2019.
FCX SUPERFUND SITE
EL PASO NATURAL GAS CORPORATION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
Project No.: 60611584 Date: 2020-01-17
PCE CONCENTRATIONS IN GROUNDWATER
BEDROCK WELLS
APRIL-OCTOBER 2019
250 375
SCALE, FEET
500
A=COM
Figure: 3-3
-------
Figure 3-4: Average Source Area Monitoring Well
PCE Concentrations (2000 to 2019)
14,000 n
12,000
10,000
O)
c
o
"5
(0
i_
c
a)
o
c
o
O
HI
o
a.
a)
O)
(0
i_
a)
8,000
6,000
4,000
2,000
Original
12,29
Notes:
1.) Tetrachloroethene (PCE) concentrations represent average of results for montioring
wells W-03s, W-05s, W-17s, EW-01 through EW-24, MP-01, MP-03, MP-04, MP-07,
MP-08, and MP-15 for each monitoring event performed between June 2000 and
October 2019.
2.) Where a monitoring well was not sampled during a given sampling event, the result
for the most recent previous event was utilized for the average concentration
calculation. For events occuring prior to the first time that a given well was sampled, the
result for the earliest sample collected from the wel was utilized for the average
concentration calculation.
3.) Where PCE was not detected above the laboratory detection limit, a value of zero
was utilized for the average concentration calculation.
4.) All results are presented in micrograms per liter (|jg/L).
5.) AS/SVE = air sparging and soil vapor extraction.
8,584
ijg/L
2009
0
1997
2013
AS/SVE
Expansion
404 |jg/L
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
2011
2013
2015
2017
2019
2021
-------
Filename: M:\DCS\PROJECTS\ENV\60562430_KMS_OU3FCX\500-DELIVERABLES\503-ANNUAL REPORT\2019 ANNUAL RA PROGRESS REPORT\FIGURES\FIGURE 3-5 PCE CROSS-SECTION A-A
2019_D RAFT. DWG
Project Management Initials: Designer: MPS Checked: CK Approved: CF
North South
A A'
I W—31 i/s W-BBd W—2Qd/i/g W-39s W-37t/s |W-6t W-61 EW-15 EW-4 MP-06/EW-22 W-5i/s W-24s W-29I W-32I I
' $ 9 ^ $—$ $ » , » $ $— —$ $ $ $ $—1
/ W-88s W-40t/s MW-JSt/a W—30i/t ^ EW-23 MP-B
MP—13/EW—13H
W—33d/i
CROSS SECTION A-A'
SCALE, FEET
-730
-710
-690
-670
LEGEND
WELL
EW - SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION WELL.
MP - MONITORING PROBE FOR 50IL VAPOR EXTRACTION/AIR SPARGE WELL,
IW. MW OR W - MONITORING WELL FOR GROUNDWATER
5APROLITE (RED/BROWN 5ILT/CLAY, SAND)
TRANSITION ZONE (GRAY, TAN. GREEN SILT/SAND/GRAVEL/ROCK FRAGMENTS)
BEDROCK
GEOLOGIC CONTACT
APPROXIMATE GROUNDWATER PHREATIC 5URFACE OCTOBER 2019
TETRACHLOROETHENE CONCENTRATIONS IN GROUNDWATER
IN MICROGRAMS PER LITER
¦ INFERRED TETRACHLOROETHENE IS0C0NT0UR IN GROUNDWATER
IN MICROGRAMS PER LITER (2019)
J ESTIMATED CONCENTRATION
s SHALLOW - 5APR0UTE WELL
t TRANSITION ZONE WELL ABOVE FRACTURED ROCK
i INTERMEDIATE ZONE WELL IN FRACTURED BEDROCK
d DEEP BEDROCK WELL IN COMPETENT BEDROCK
W—31 i/s WELL LOCATION
SCREEN INTERVAL
TOTAL DEPTH OF BORE HOLE
MSL MEAN SEA LEVEL
NS NOT SAMPLED
NOTE:
1. DATA REPRESENTS MOST RECENT
SAMPLE RESULTS IN 2019.
2. CONCENTRATIONS REACH AS HIGH AS
204 MICROGRAMS PER LITER IN
BEDROCK WEST OF CROSS-SECTION
LOCATION NEAR SOURCE AREA (SEE
FIGURE 3—3)
CROSS SECTION LOCATIONS
SCALE: r=600*
FCX SUPERFUND SITE
EL PASO NATURAL GAS CORPORATION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
Project No.: 60611584 Date: 2020-01-20
CROSS SECTION A-A1
PCE CONCENTRATIONS IN GROUNDWATER
AECOM
Figure: 3-5
-------
W—87 530
W—86 832
W—85 810
W—35s W—84(416)
600J W—83900
W-82860
yv—81 930
W—80950
W—791,1 00
W—781,1 00
W— 7 71,100
W-76 ,100
W-759 80
1,220 W—74940
MP-17ff'W_5t W-73920 FW_1g
1,530 W—721,200 1,120
W-711,000
W—70(480)
¦<¦¦-© W-693.30Q. e 000
W—68(230)
W—676,800
W-66(380)
W-65(2,500)
Vv-6414,000 20,000
V/—6330,000
W—7s W"62' 3'°°0 EW-15
NS W-6120,000 59.830J
W-6012,000
VV—5929,000
W-5817,000
w_571 6,000
W—56(1,500)
MP-16® W—552,300 4'650
3880
W—54 5%1R
EW-5
13.500J
IW—6t
11,400J
EW-13
25.800J
W-51 ,300
©W-50 J 1,100)
©W-49 J,700)
©W—482,900
W—472,p00
©W—463/880
©W—454,000
©W—442,0(30^
©W-43(730)\
©W—42 (610)
©W-412,340
LEGEND
ffl® SAPROLITE MONITORING WELL
H® TRANSITION MONITORING WELL
26.7 PCE CONCENTRATION IN
GROUNDWATER (p/L)
(380) PCE CONCENTRATION
(NOT USED FOR CONTOURING)
NS NOT SAMPLED
J ESTIMATED VALUE
PCE CONCENTRATION ISOCONTOUR
(MICROGRAMS PER LITER)
DASHED WHERE INFERRED
DATA REPRESENTS MOST RECENT SAMPLE
RESULTS IN 2007-2008.
Filename: \\172.24.168.25\MORRISVILL.E\DCS\PROJECTS\ENV\6056230_KMS_OU3FCX\500-DELJVERABLES\503-ANNUAL REPORT\2019\NNUAL RA PROGRESS REPORT\FIGURES\FIGURE 3-6 - PCE
CONCENTRATIONS SOURCE AREA MAP2007-2008.DWG Project Management Initials; Designer: MPS Checked:CK Approved: CF
FCX SUPERFUND SITE
EL PASO NATURAL GAS CORPORATION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
Project No.: 60611584 Date: 2020-01-20
PCE CONCENTRATIONS IN GROUNDWATER
TRANSITION AND SAPROLITE WELLS,
SOURCE AREA - 2007-2008
60
APPROX. SCALE, ft.
AECOM
Figure: 3-6
-------
©IW—6t
2620
LEGEND
ES© SAPROUTE MONITORING WELL
S® TRANSITION MONITORING WELL
1*7 PCE CONCENTRATION IN
GROUNDWATER (jj/L)
NS NOT SAMPLED
J ESTIMATED VALUE
PCE CONCENTRATION ISOCONTOUR
(MICROGRAMS PER UTER)
DASHED WHERE INFERRED
DATA REPRESENTS MOST RECENT SAMPLE
RESULTS IN 2019.
Filename: L:\DCS\PROJECTS\ENV\60562430_KMS_OU3FCX\500-DELIVERABLES\503-ANNUAL REPORTY2019 ANNUAL RA PROGRESS REPORT\FIGURES\FIGURE 3-7 - PCE CONCENTRATIONS SOURCE AREA MAP 2019_ERL.DWG Project Management Initials: Designer: MPS Checked: CK Approved: CF
FCX SUPERFUND SITE
EL PASO NATURAL GAS CORPORATION
STATESVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
Project No.: 60611584 Date: 2020-01-20
PCE CONCENTRATIONS IN GROUNDWATER
TRANSITION AND SAPROLITE WELLS,
SOURCE AREA -2019
APPROX. SCALE, ft.
AECOM
Figure: 3-7
-------
Appendix A
Historical Groundwater Elevation Data
*The remainder of the report is not included in this FYR due to the size of the
data. A full copy of this report is available through the US EPA*
-------
APPENDIX J
North Carolina Administrative Code (ISA NCAC 02C .0101)
Well Construction Act
J-l
-------
North Carolina Administrative
Title 15A
Department of Environment and Natural
- " - ¦ - " - ¦ ¦
Division of Water Qu
urces
11
Jo J
Subchapter 2C
Section .0100
Well
Construction
Standards
Criteria and Standards
Applicable to Water Supply
and Certain Other Wells
Current Through October 1, 2009
Environmental Management Commission
Raleigh, NC
-------
ENR — Environmental Management
15ANCAC.0100
SUBCHAPTER 2C WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
RULE .0101 GENERAL PROVISIONS 1
RULE .0102 DEFINITIONS 1
RULE .0103 REGISTRATION (Repealed) 3
RULE .0104 PUMP INSTALLATIONS REGISTRATION (Repealed) 3
RULE .0105 PERMITS 4
RULE .0106 WATER USE PERMIT (Repealed) 5
RULE .0107 STANDARDS OF CONSTRUCTION: WATER SUPPLY WELLS 6
RULE .0108 STANDARDS OF CONSTRUCTION: WELLS OTHER THAN WATER
SUPPLY 14
RULE. 0109 PUMPS AND PUMPING EQUIPMENT 16
RULE .0110 WELL TESTS FOR YIELD 17
RULE .0111 DISINFECTION OF WATER SUPPLY WELLS 19
RULE .0112 WELL MAINTENANCE: REPAIR: GROUNDWATER RESOURCES 20
RULE . 0113 AB ANDONMENT OF WELLS 20
RULE .0114 DATA AND RECORDS REQUIRED 22
RULE .0115 DIAGRAMS AND FORMS (Repealed) 23
RULE .0116 DESIGNATED AREAS: WELLS CASED TO LESS THAN 20 FEET 23
RULE .0117 DESIGNATED AREAS: WELLS CASED TO LESS THAN 35 FEET 24
RULE .0118 VARIANCE 25
RULE .0119 DELEGATION 26
-------
ENR — Environmental Management
15ANCAC.0100
SUBCHAPTER 2C WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS
15A NCAC 02C .0101 GENERAL PROVISIONS
(a) Authorization. The North Carolina Environmental Management Commission is required, under
the provisions of Chapter 87, Article 7, Section 87, General Statutes of North Carolina (short title:
North Carolina Well Construction Act) to adopt appropriate rules governing the location,
construction, repair, and abandonment of wells, and the installation and repair of pumps and pumping
equipment.
(b) Purpose. Consistent with the duty to safeguard the public welfare, safety, health, and to protect
and beneficially develop the groundwater resources of the state, it is declared to be the policy of this
state to require that the location, construction, repair and abandonment of wells, and the installation
of pumps and pumping equipment conform to such reasonable standards and requirements as may be
necessary to protect the public welfare, safety, health, and ground water resources.
History Note: Authority G.S. 87-87;
Eff. February 1, 1976;
Amended Eff. December 1, 1992; July 1, 1988.
ISA NCAC 02C .0102 DEFINITIONS
The terms used in this Subchapter shall be as defined in G.S. 87-85 and as follows, unless the context
otherwise requires:
(1) "Abandon" means to discontinue the use of and to seal a well according to the
requirements of 15A NCAC 02C .0113 of this Section.
(2) "Access port" means an opening in the well casing or well head installed for the
primary purpose of determining the position of the water level in the well or to
facilitate disinfection.
(3) "Agent" means any person who by mutual and legal agreement with a well owner has
authority to act in his behalf in executing applications for permits. The agent may be
either general agent or a limited agent authorized to do one particular act.
(4) "Annular Space" means the space between the casing and the walls of the borehole or
outer casing, or the space between a liner pipe and well casing.
(5) "Artesian flowing well" means any well in which groundwater flows above the land
surface without the use of a pump; where the static water level or hydraulic head
elevation is greater than the land surface under natural conditions.
(6) "ASTVl" means the American Society for Testing and Materials.
(7) "Casing" means pipe or tubing constructed of materials and having dimensions and
weights as specified in the Rules of this Subchapter, that is installed in a borehole,
during or after completion of the borehole, to support the side of the hole and thereby
prevent caving, to allow completion of a well, to prevent formation material from
entering the well, to prevent the loss of drilling fluids into permeable formations, and
to prevent entry of contamination.
(8) "Clay" means a substance comprised of natural, inorganic, fine-grained crystalline
mineral fragments which, when mixed with water, forms a pasty, moldable mass that
preserves its shape when air dried.
(9) "Commission" means the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission
or its successor, unless otherwise indicated.
(10) "Consolidated rock" means rock that is firm and coherent, solidified or cemented,
such as granite, gneiss, limestone, slate or sandstone, that has not been decomposed
by weathering.
'1
-------
ENR — Environmental Management
15ANCAC.0100
(11) "Contaminate" or "Contamination" means the introduction of foreign materials of
such nature, quality, and quantity into the groundwaters as to exceed the groundwater
quality standards specified in 15A NCAC 02L (Classifications and Water Quality
Standards Applicable to the Groundwaters of North Carolina).
[Note: 15A NCAC 02L .0202(b)(3) addresses where naturally occurring substances
exceed the established standard.]
(12) "Department" is as defined in G.S. 87-85(5a).
(13) "Designed capacity" means that capacity that is equal to the yield that is specified by
the well owner or his agent prior to construction of the well.
(14) "Director" means the Director of the Division of Water Quality or the Director's
delegate.
(15) "Division" means the Division of Water Quality.
(16) "Domestic use" means water used for drinking, bathing, or other household purposes,
livestock, or gardens.
(17) "Formation Material" means naturally occurring material generated during the
drilling process that is composed of sands, silts, clays or fragments of rock and which
is not in a dissolved state.
(18) "GPM" and "GPD" mean gallons per minute and gallons per day, respectively.
(19) "Grout" means a material approved in accordance with Rule .0107(e) of this Section
for use in sealing the annular space of a well or liner or for sealing a well during
abandonment.
(20) "Liner pipe" means pipe that is installed inside a completed and cased well for the
purpose of preventing the entrance of contamination into the well or for repairing
ruptured, corroded or punctured casing or screens.
(21) "Monitoring well" means any well constructed for the primary purpose of obtaining
samples of groundwater or other liquids for examination or testing, or for the
observation or measurement of groundwater levels. This definition excludes
lysimeters, tensiometers, and other devices used to investigate the characteristics of
the unsaturated zone but includes piezometers, a type of monitoring well constructed
solely for the purpose of determining groundwater levels.
(22) "Owner" means any person who holds the fee or other property rights in the well
being constructed.
[Note: Absent a contrary agreement in writing, the Department will presume that the
well owner and the land owner are the same person.]
(23) "Pitless adapters" or "pitless units" are devices manufactured to the standards
specified under 15A NCAC 02C .01070(5) for the purpose of allowing a subsurface
lateral connection between a well and plumbing appurtenances.
(24) "Public water system" means a water system as defined in 15A NCAC 18C (Rules
Governing Public Water Supplies).
(25) "Recovery well" means any well constructed for the purpose of removing
contaminated groundwater or other liquids from the subsurface.
(26) "Saline" means having a chloride concentration of more than 250 milligrams per liter.
(27) "Secretary" means the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources or the Secretary's delegate.
(28) "Settleable solids" means the volume of solid particles in a well-mixed one liter
sample which will settle out of suspension, in the bottom of an lmhoff Cone, after
one hour.
2
-------
ENR — Environmental Management
15ANCAC.0100
(29) "Site" means the land or water area where any facility, activity or situation is
physically located, including adjacent or other land used in connection with the
facility, activity or situation.
(30) "Specific capacity" means the yield of the well expressed in gallons per minute per
foot of draw-down of the water level (gpm/ft.-dd).
(31) "Static water level" means the level at which the water stands in the well when the
well is not being pumped and is expressed as the distance from a fixed reference
point to the water level in the well.
(32) "Suspended solids" means the weight of those solid particles in a sample which are
retained by a standard glass microfiber filter, with pore openings of one and one-half
microns, when dried at a temperature between 103 and 105 degrees Fahrenheit.
(33) "Temporary well" means a well that is constructed to determine aquifer
characteristics, and which will be permanently abandoned or converted to a
permanent well within seven days (168 hours) of the completion of drilling of the
borehole.
(34) "Turbidity" means the cloudiness in water, due to the presence of suspended particles
such as clay and silt, that may create esthetic problems or analytical difficulties for
determining contamination.
(35) "Vent" means a permanent opening in the well casing or well head, installed for the
purpose of allowing changes in the water level in a well due to natural atmospheric
changes or to pumping. A vent may also serve as an access port.
(36) "Well" is as defined in G.S. 87-85(14).
(37) "Well capacity" means the maximum quantity of water that a well will yield
continuously as determined by methods outlined in 15A NCAC 02C .0110.
(38) "Well head" means the upper terminal of the well including adapters, ports, valves,
seals, and other attachments.
(39) "Well system" means two or more wells connected to the same distribution or
collection system or, if not connected to a distribution or collection system, two or
more wells serving the same site.
(40) "Yield" means the volume of water or other fluid per time that can be discharged
from a well under a given set of circumstances.
History! Note: Authority G.S. 87-85: 87-87; 143-214.2; 143-215.3;
Eff February 1, 1976;
Amended Eff. September 1, 2009; April 1, 2001; December 1, 1992; July 1, 1988;
March 1, 1985; September /, 1984.
15A NCAC 02 C .0103 REGISTRATION
History Note: Authority G.S. 87-87; 143-215.3(a)(la); 143-355(e);
Eff. February 1. 1976;
Amended Eff. April 1, 2001; December 1, 1992; July 1, 1988; April 20, 1978;
Repealed Eff. September 1, 2009.
ISA NCAC 02C .0104 PUMP INSTALLATION REGISTRATION
History Note: Authority G.S. 87-87;
Eff. February 1, 1976;
Repealed Eff. July 1, 1988.
3
-------
ENR — Environmental Management
15ANCAC.0100
ISA NCAC02C .0105 PERMITS
(a) It is the finding of the Commission that the entire geographical area of the state is vulnerable to
groundwater pollution from improperly located, constructed, operated, altered, or abandoned wells.
Therefore, in order to ensure reasonable protection of the groundwater resources, prior permission
from the Department shall be obtained for the construction of the types of wells enumerated in
Paragraph (b) of this Rule.
(b) No person shall locate or construct any of the following wells until a permit has been issued by
the Department:
(1) any water-well or well system with a designed capacity of 100,000 gallons per day
(gpd) or greater;
(2) any well added to an existing system where the total designed capacity of such
existing well system and added well will equal or exceed 100,000 gpd;
(3) any monitoring well or monitoring well system, constructed to assess hydrogeologic
conditions on property not owned by the well owner;
(4) any recovery well;
(5) any well with a design deviation from the standards specified under the rules of this
Subchapter, including wells for which a variance is required.
(c) The Department shall issue permits for wells used for recharge or injection purposes in
accordance with 15A NCAC 02C .0200.
(d) The Department shall issue permits for private drinking water wells in accordance with 15A
NCAC 02C .0300, including private drinking water wells with a designed capacity greater than
100,000 gallons per day and private drinking water wells for which a variance is required.
(e) An application for any well requiring a permit pursuant to Paragraph (b) of this Rule shall be
submitted by the owner or his agent. In the event that the permit applicant is not the owner of the
property on which the well or well system is to be constructed, the permit application shall contain
written approval from the property owner and a statement that the applicant assumes total
responsibility for ensuring that the well(s) will be located, constructed, maintained and abandoned in
accordance with the requirements of this Subchapter.
(f) The application shall be submitted to the Department on forms furnished by the Department, and
shall include the following:
(1) the owner's name;
(2) the owner's mailing address and proposed well site address;
(3) description of the well type and activity requiring a permit;
(4) site location (map);
(5) a map of the site, to scale, showing the locations of:
(A) all property boundaries, at least one of which is referenced to a minimum of
two landmarks such as identified roads, intersections, streams or lakes within
500 feet of proposed well or well system;
(B) all existing wells, identified by type of use, within 500 feet of proposed well
or well system;
(C) the proposed well or well system;
(D) any test borings within 500 feet of proposed well or well system; and
(E) all sources of known or potential groundwater contamination (such as septic
tank systems; pesticide, chemical or fuel storage areas; animal feedlots, as
defined by G.S. 143-215.10B(5); landfills or other waste disposal areas)
within 500 feet of the proposed well.
(6) the well contractor's name and state certification number, if known; and
4
-------
ENR — En vironmental Management 15A NCA C. 0100
(7) construction diagram of the proposed well(s) including specifications describing all
materials to be used, methods of construction and means for assuring the integrity
and quality of the finished well(s).
(g) For water supply wells or well systems with a designed capacity of 100,000 gpd or greater, the
application shall include, in addition to the information required in Paragraph (f) of this Rule:
(1) the number, yield and location of existing wells in the system;
(2) the designed capacity of the proposed well(s);
(3) for wells to be screened in multiple zones or aquifers, representative data on the static
water level and pH, specific conductance, and concentrations of sodium, potassium,
calcium, magnesium, sulfate, chloride, and carbonates from each aquifer or zone
from which water is proposed to be withdrawn. The data submitted shall be
sufficient to demonstrate that construction of the proposed well will satisfy the
requirements of 15A NCAC 02C .0107(h)(2);
(4) a copy of any water use permit required pursuant to G.S. 143-215.15; and
(5) any other well construction information or site specific information deemed necessary
by the Department for the protection of human health and the environment.
(h) For those monitoring wells with a design deviation from the specifications of 15A NCAC 02C
.0108 of this Section, in addition to the information required in Paragraph (f) of this Rule, the
application shall include:
(1) a description of the subsurface conditions sufficient to evaluate the site. Data from
test borings, wells, and pumping tests may be necessary;
(2) a description of the quantity, character and origin of the contamination;
(3) justification for the necessity of the design deviation; and
(4) any other well construction information or site specific information deemed necessary
by the Department for the protection of human health and the environment.
(i) For those recovery wells with a design deviation from the specifications in 15A NCAC 02C
.0108 of this Section, in addition to the information required in Paragraphs (f) and (h) of this Rule,
the application shall describe the disposition of any fluids recovered if the disposal of those fluids
will have an impact on any existing wells other than those installed for the express purpose of
measuring the effectiveness of the recovery well(s).
(j) In the event of an emergency, any well listed in Subparagraph (b)(1) through (b)(4) of this Rule
may be constructed after verbal approval is provided by the Department. After-the-fact applications
shall be submitted by the person responsible for drilling or owner within ten days after construction
begins. The application shall include construction details of the well(s) and include the name of the
person who gave verbal approval and the time and date that approval was given.
(k) The well owner or his agent shall see that a permit is secured prior to the beginning of
construction of any well for which a permit is required under the rules of this Subchapter.
History Note: Authority G.S. 87-87; 143-215.1;
Eff. February 1, 1976;
Amended Eff. September 1, 2009; April 1. 2001; December 1. 1992; March 1, 1985;
September 1, 1984; April 20, 1978.
15A NCAC 02C .0106 WATER USE PERMIT
History Note: Authority G.S. 143-215.14; 143-215.15;
Eff. February 1, 1976;
Repealed Eff. April 20, 1978.
5
-------
ENR — Environmental Management
15ANCAC.0100
ISA NCAC 02C .0107 STANDARDS OF CONSTRUCTION: WATER SUPPLY
WELLS
(a) Location.
(1) A water supply well shall not be located in any area where surface water or runoff
will accumulate around the well due to depressions, drainage ways, and other
landscapes that will concentrate water around the well.
(2) The minimum horizontal separation between a water supply well and potential
sources of groundwater contamination, which exist at the time the well is constructed,
is as follows unless otherwise specified:
(A) Septic tank and drainfield, including drainfield repair area 100 feet
(B) Other subsurface ground absorption waste disposal system 100 feet
(C) Industrial or municipal residuals disposal or wastewater-irrigation sites
100 feet
(D) Sewage or liquid-waste collection or transfer facility constructed to water
main standards in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .0305(g)(2) or 15A
NCAC 18A .1950(e), as applicable 50 feet
(E) Other sewage and liquid-waste collection or transfer facility 100 feet
(F) Cesspools and privies 100 feet
(G) Animal feedlots, as defined by G.S. 143-215.10B(5), or manure piles
100 feet
(H) Fertilizer, pesticide, herbicide or other chemical storage areas 100 feet
(I) Non-hazardous waste storage, treatment or disposal lagoons 100 feet
(J) Sanitary landfills, municipal solid waste landfill facilities, incinerators,
construction and demolition (C&D) landfills and other disposal sites except
Land Clearing and Inert Debris landfills 500 feet
(K) Land Clearing and Inert Debris (LCID) landfills 100 feet
(L) Animal barns 100 feet
(M) Building perimeters, including any attached structures 25 feet
(N) Surface water bodies which act as sources of groundwater recharge, such as
ponds, lakes and reservoirs 50 feet
(O) All other surface water bodies, such as brooks, creeks, streams, rivers,
sounds, bays and tidal estuaries 25 feet
(P) Chemical or petroleum fuel underground storage tank systems regulated
under 15ANCAC 02N:
(i) with secondary containment 50 feet
(ii) without secondary containment 100 feet
(Q) Above ground or underground storage tanks which contain petroleum fuels
used for heating equipment, boilers or furnaces, with the exception of tanks
used solely for storage of propane, natural gas, or liquefied petroleum gas
50 feet
(R) All other petroleum or chemical storage tank systems 100 feet
(S) Gravesites 50 feet
(T) All other potential sources of groundwater contamination 50 feet
(3) For a water supply well [as defined in G.S. 87-85(13)] on a lot serving a
single-family dwelling and intended for domestic use, where lot size or other fixed
conditions preclude the separation distances specified in Subparagraph (a)(2) of this
Rule, the required horizontal separation distances shall be the maximum possible but
shall in no case be less than the following:
6
-------
ENR — Environmental Management
15ANCAC.0100
(A) Septic tank and dramfield, including dramfield repair areas, except saprolite
systems as defined in 15A NCAC 18A .1956(6) 50 feet
(B) Sewage or liquid-waste collection or transfer facility constructed to water
main standards in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T .0305(g)(2) or 15A
NCAC 18A .1950(e), as applicable 25 feet
(C) Animal barns 50 feet
Minimum separation distances for all other potential sources of groundwater
contamination shall be those specified in Subparagraph (a)(2) of this Rule.
(4) In addition to the minimum separation distances specified in Subparagraph (a)(2) of
this Rule, a well or well system with a designed capacity of 100,000 gpd or greater
shall be located a sufficient distance from known or anticipated sources of
groundwater contamination so as to prevent a violation of applicable groundwater
quality standards, resulting from the movement of contaminants, in response to the
operation of the well or well system at the proposed rate and schedule of pumping.
(5) Wells drilled for public water supply systems regulated by the Division of
Environmental Health shall meet the requirements of 15 A NCAC 18C.
(b) Source of water.
(1) The source of water for any water supply well shall not be from a water bearing zone
or aquifer that is contaminated;
(2) In designated areas described in 15A NCAC 02C .0117 of this Section, the source
shall be greater than 35 feet below land surface;
(3) In designated areas described in 15A NCAC 02C .0116 of this Section, the source
may be less than 20 feet below land surface, but in no case less than 10 feet below
land surface;
(4) For wells constructed with separation distances less than those specified in
Subparagraph (a)(2) of this Rule based on lot size or other fixed conditions as
specified in Subparagraph (a)(3) of this Rule, the source shall be greater than 35 feet
below land surface except m areas described in Rule .0116 of this Section; and
(5) In all other areas the source shall be at least 20 feet below land surface.
(c) Drilling Fluids and Additives. Drilling Fluids and Additives shall not contain organic or toxic
substances or include water obtained from surface water bodies or water from a non-potable supply
and may be comprised only of:
(1) the formational material encountered during drilling; or
(2) materials manufactured specifically for the purpose of borehole conditioning or water
well construction.
(d) Casing.
(1) If steel casing is used:
(A) The casing shall be new, seamless or electric-resistance welded galvanized or
black steel pipe. Galvanizing shall be done in accordance with requirements
of ASTM A53/A53M-07, which is hereby incorporated by reference,
including subsequent amendments and editions, and can be obtained from
ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C 700, West
Conshohocken, PA, 19428-2959 at a cost of fifty-one dollars ($51.00);
(B) The casing, threads and couplings shall meet or exceed the specifications of
ASTM A53/A53M-07 or A589/589M-06, which is hereby incorporated by
reference, including subsequent amendments and editions, and can be
obtained from ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C 700,
West Conshohocken, PA, 19428-2959 at a cost of fifty-one dollars ($51.00)
and forty-three dollars ($43.00), respectively;
7
-------
ENR — Environmental Management
15ANCAC.0100
(C) The wall thickness for a given diameter shall equal or exceed that specified in
Table 1;
TABLE 1: MINIMUM WALL THICKNESS FOR STEEL CASING:
Nominal Diameter
Wall Thickness
(inches)
(inches)
For 3.5 inch or smaller pipe, schedule 40 is required
4
0.1.42
5
0.156
5.5
0.164
6
0.185
8
0.250
10
0.279
12
0.330
14 and larger
0.375
(D) Stainless steel casing, threads, and couplings shall conform in specifications
to the general requirements in ASTM A530/A530M-04a, which is hereby
incorporated by reference, including subsequent amendments and editions,
and can be obtained from ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO
Box C 700, West Conshohocken, PA, 19428-2959 at a cost of thirty-seven
dollars ($37.00), and also shall conform to the specific requirements in the
ASTM standard that best describes the chemical makeup of the stainless steel
casing that is intended for use in the construction of the well;
(E) Stainless steel casing shall have a minimum wall thickness that is equivalent
to standard schedule number 10S; and
(F) Steel casing shall be equipped with a drive shoe if the casing is driven in a
consolidated rock formation. The drive shoe shall be made of forged, high
carbon, tempered seamless steel and shall have a beveled, hardened cutting
edge.
(2) If Thermoplastic Casing is used:
(A) The casing shall be new;
(B) The casing and joints shall meet or exceed all the specifications of ASTM
F480-06b, except that the outside diameters shall not be restricted to those
listed in ASTM F480-06b, which is hereby incorporated by reference,
including subsequent amendments and editions, and can be obtained from
ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C 700, West
Conshohocken, PA, 19428-2959 at a cost of fifty-one dollars ($51.00);
(C) The depth of installation for a given SDR or Schedule number shall not
exceed that listed in Table 2 unless, upon request of the Department, written
documentation from the manufacturer of the casing stating that the casing
may safely be used at the depth at which it is to be installed is provided.
8
-------
ENR — Environmental Management
15ANCAC.0100
TABLE 2: Maximum allowable depths (in feet) of Installation of
Thermoplastic Water Well Casing
Nominal
Diameter
(inches)
Maximum
Depth (in feet)
for Schedule 40
Maximum
Depth (in feet)
for Schedule 80
2
485
1.460
3
415
1170
3.5
315
920
4
253
755
5
180
550
6
130
495
8
85
340
10
65
290
12
65
270
14
50
265
16
50
255
Maximum
Depth (in
feet) for
SDR 21
Maximum
Depth (in
feet) for
SDR 17
Maximum
Depth (in
feet) for
SDR 13.5
All
Diameters
185
355
735
(D) Thermoplastic casing with wall thickness less than that corresponding to SDR
21 or Schedule 40 shall not be used;
(E) For wells in which the casing wall extend into consolidated rock,
thermoplastic casing shall be equipped with a coupling, or other device
approved by the manufacturer of the casing, that is sufficient to protect the
physical integrity of the thermoplastic casing during the processes of seating
and grouting the casing and subsequent drilling operations; and
(F) Thermoplastic casing shall not be driven by impact, but may be pushed.
(3) In constructing any well, all water-bearing zones that contain contaminated, saline, or
other non-potable water shall be cased and grouted so that contamination of overlying
and underlying groundwater zones shall not occur.
(4) Every well shall be cased so that the bottom of the casing extends to a minimum
depth as follows:
(A) Wells located within the area described in Rule .0117 of this Section shall be
cased from land surface to a depth of at least 35 feet.
(B) Wells located within the area described in Rule .0116 of this Section shall be
cased from land surface to a depth of at least 10 feet.
(C) Wells constructed with separation distances less than those specified in
Subparagraph (a)(2) of this Rule based on lot size or other fixed conditions as
specified in Subparagraph (a)(3) of this Rule shall be cased from land surface
to a depth of at least 35 feet except in areas described in Rule .0116 of this
Section.
9
-------
ENR — Environmental Management
15ANCAC.0100
(D) Wells located in any other area shall be cased from land surface to a depth of
at least 20 feet.
(5) The top of the casing shall be terminated at least 12 inches above land surface,
regardless of the method of well construction and type of pump to be installed.
(6) The casing in wells constructed to obtain water from a consolidated rock formation
shall meet the requirements specified in Subparagraphs (d)(1) through (d)(5) of this
Rule and shall be:
(A) adequate to prevent any formational material from entering the well in excess
of the levels specified in Paragraph (h) of this Rule; and
(B) firmly seated at least five feet into the rock.
(7) The casing in wells constructed to obtain water from an unconsolidated rock
formation (such as gravel, sand or shells) shall extend at least one foot into the top of
the water-bearing formation.
(8) Upon completion of the well, the well shall be sufficiently free of obstacles including
formation material as necessary to allow for the installation and proper operation of
pumps and associated equipment.
(9) Prior to removing equipment from the site, the top of the casing shall be sealed with a
water-tight cap or well seal, as defined in G.S. 87-85(16), to preclude the entrance of
contaminants into the well.
(e) Allowable Grouts.
(1) One of the following grouts shall be used wherever grout is required by a rule of this
Section. Where a particular type of grout is specified by a Rule of this Section, no
other type of grout shall be used.
(A) Neat cement grout shall consist of a mixture of not more than six gallons of
clear, potable water to one 94 pound bag of Portland cement. Up to five
percent, by weight, of bentonite may be used to improve flow and reduce
shrinkage. If bentonite is used, additional water may be added at a rate not to
exceed 0.6 gallons of water for each pound of bentonite.
(B) Sand cement grout shall consist of a mixture of not more than two parts sand
and one part cement and not more than six gallons of clear, potable water per
94 pound bag of Portland cement.
(C) Concrete grout shall consist of a mixture of not more than two parts gravel or
rock cuttings to one part cement and not more than six gallons of clear,
potable water per 94 pound bag of Portland cement. One hundred percent of
the gravel or rock cuttings must be able to pass through a one-half inch mesh
screen.
(D) Bentonite slurry grout shall consist of a mixture of not more than 24 gallons
of clear, potable water to one 50 pound bag of commercial sodium bentonite.
Non-organic, non-toxic substances may be added to bentonite slurry grout
mixtures to improve particle distribution and pumpability. Bentonite slurry
grout may only be used in accordance with the manufacturer's written
instructions.
(E) Bentonite chips or pellets shall consist of pre-screened sodium bentonite
chips or compressed sodium bentonite pellets with largest dimension of at
least one-fourth inch but not greater than one-fifth of the width of the annular
space into which they are to be placed. Bentonite chips or pellets shall be
hydrated in place. Bentonite chips or pellets may only be used in accordance
with the manufacturer's written instructions.
10
-------
ENR — Environmental Management
15ANCAC.0100
(F) Specialty grout shall consist of a mixture of non-organic, non-toxic materials
with characteristics of expansion, chemical-resistance, rate or heat of
hydration, viscosity, density or temperature-sensitivity applicable to specific
grouting requirements. Specialty grouts may not be used without prior
approval by the Secretary. Approval of the use of specialty grouts shall be
based on a demonstration that the finished grout has a permeability less than
10"6 centimeters per second and will not adversely impact human health or the
environment.
(2) With the exception of bentonite chips or pellets, the liquid and solid components of
all grout mixtures shall be blended prior to emplacement below land surface.
(3) No fly ash, other coal combustion byproducts, or other wastes may be used in any
grout.
(f) Grout emplacement.
(1) Casing shall be grouted to a minimum depth of 20 feet below land surface except
that:
(A) In those areas designated by the Director to meet the criteria of Rule .0116 of
this Section, grout shall extend to a depth of two feet above the screen or, for
open end wells, to the bottom of the casing, but in no case less than 10 feet.
(B) In those areas designated in Rule .0117 of this Section, grout shall extend to a
minimum of 35 feet below land surface.
(2) In addition to the grouting required by Subparagraph (f)(1) of this Rule, the casing
shall be grouted as necessary to seal off all aquifers or zones that contain
contaminated, saline, or other non-potable water so that contamination of overlying
and underlying aquifers or zones shall not occur.
(3) Bentonite slurry grout may be used in that portion of the borehole that is at least three
feet below land surface. That portion of the borehole from land surface to at least
three feet below land surface shall be filled with a concrete or cement-type grout or
bentonite chips or pellets that are hydrated in place.
(4) Grout shall be placed around the casing by one of the following methods:
(A) Pressure. Grout shall be pumped or forced under pressure through the bottom
of the casing until it fills the annular space around the casing and overflows at
the surface;
(B) Pumping. Grout shall be pumped into place through a hose or pipe extended
to the bottom of the annular space which can be raised as the grout is applied.
The grout hose or pipe shall remain submerged in grout during the entire
application; or
(C) Other. Grout may be emplaced in the annular space by gravity flow in such a
way to ensure complete filling of the space. Gravity flow shall not be used if
water or any visible obstruction is present in the annular space within the
applicable minimum grout depth specified in Subparagraph (f)(1) of this Rule
at the time of grouting, with the exception that bentonite chips or pellets may
be used if water is present, if designed for that purpose.
(5) If a Rule of this Section requires grouting of the casing to a depth greater than 20 feet
below land surface, the pumping or pressure method shall be used to grout that
portion of the borehole deeper than 20 feet below land surface, with the exception of
bentonite chips and pellets, used in accordance with Part (f)(4)(C) of this Rule.
(6) If an outer casing is installed, it shall be grouted by either the pumping or pressure
method.
11
-------
ENR — En vironmental Management 15A NCA C. 0100
(7) Bentomte chips or pellets shall be used in compliance with all manufacturer's
instructions including pre-screemng the material to eliminate fine-grained particles,
installation rates, hydration methods, tamping, and other measures to prevent
bridging.
(8) Bentonite grout shall not be used to seal zones of water with a chloride concentration
of 1,500 milligrams per liter or greater.
(9) The well shall be grouted within seven days after the casing is set.
(10) No additives which will accelerate the process of hydration shall be used in grout for
thermoplastic well casing.
(11) Where grouting is required by the provisions of this Section, the grout shall extend
outward in all directions from the casing wall to a minimum thickness equal to either
one-third of the diameter of the outside dimension of the casing or two inches,
whichever is greater; but in no case shall a well be required to have an annular grout
seal thickness greater than four inches.
(12) For wells constructed in locations where flowing artesian conditions are encountered
or expected to occur, the well shall be adequately grouted to protect the artesian
aquifer, prevent erosion of overlying material and confine the flow within the casing.
(g) Well Screens.
(1) The well, if constructed to obtain water from an unconsolidated rock formation, shall
be equipped with a screen that will prevent the entrance of formation material into the
well after the well has been developed and completed.
(2) The well screen shall be of a design to permit the optimum development of the
aquifer with minimum head loss consistent with the intended use of the well. The
openings shall be designed to prevent clogging and shall be free of rough edges,
irregularities or other defects that may accelerate or contribute to corrosion or
clogging.
(3) Multi-screen wells shall not connect aquifers or zones which have differences in
water quality which would result in contamination of any aquifer or zone.
(h) Gravel-and Sand-Packed Wells.
(1) In constructing a gravel-or sand-packed well:
(A) The packing material shall be composed of quartz, granite, or similar mineral
or rock material and shall be clean, of uniform size, water-washed and free
from clay, silt, or other deleterious material.
(B) The size of the packing material shall be determined from a grain size
analysis of the formation material and shall be of a size sufficient to prohibit
the entrance of formation material into the well in concentrations above those
permitted by Paragraph (i) of this Rule.
(C) The packing material shall be placed in the annular space around the screens
and casing by a fluid circulation method to ensure accurate placement and
avoid bridging.
(D) The packing material shall be disinfected.
(2) The packing material shall not connect aquifers or zones which have differences in
water quality that would result in contamination of any aquifer or zone.
(i) All water supply wells shall be developed by the well contractor. Development shall include
removal of formation materials, mud, drilling fluids and additives such that the water contains no
more than:
(1) five milliliters per liter of settleable solids; and
(2) 10 NTUs of turbidity as suspended solids.
12
-------
ENR — Environmental Management
15ANCAC.0100
Development does not require efforts to reduce or eliminate the presence of dissolved constituents
which are indigenous to the ground water quality in that area.
(j) Well Head Completion.
(1) Access Port. Every water supply well shall be equipped with a usable access port or
air line, except those with a multi-pipe deep well jet pump or adapter mounted on the
well casing or well head, and wells with casing two inches or less in diameter where a
suction pipe is connected to a suction lift pump. The access port shall be at least one
half inch inside diameter opening so that the position of the water level can be
determined at any time. The port shall be installed and maintained in such manner as
to prevent entrance of water or foreign material.
(2) Well Contractor Identification Plate.
(A) An identification plate, showing the well contractor and certification number
and the information specified in Part (j)(2)(E) of this Rule, shall be installed
on the well within 72 hours after completion of the drilling.
(B) The identification plate shall be constructed of a durable weatherproof,
rustproof metal, or other material approved by the Department as equivalent.
(C) The identification plate shall be permanently attached to either the
aboveground portion of the well casing, surface grout pad or enclosure floor
around the casing where it is readily visible and in a manner that does not
obscure the information on the identification plate.
(D) The identification plate shall not be removed by any person.
(E) The identification plate shall be stamped to show the:
(i) total depth of well;
(ii) casing depth (feet) and inside diameter (inches);
(iii) screened intervals of screened wells;
(iv) packing interval of gravel-or sand-packed wells;
(v) yield, in gallons per minute (gpm), or specific capacity in gallons per
minute per foot of drawdown (gpm ft -dd);
(vi) static water level and date measured;
(vii) date well completed; and
(viii) the well construction permit number or numbers, if such a permit is
required.
(3) Pump Installation Information Plate.
(A) An information plate, showing the well contractor and certification number of
the person installing the pump, and the information specified in Part Q(3)(D)
of this Rule, shall be permanently attached to either the aboveground portion
of the well casing, surface grout pad or the enclosure floor, if present, where
it is readily visible and in a manner that does not obscure the information on
the identification plate within 72 hours after completion of the pump
installation;
(B) The information plate shall be constructed of a durable waterproof, rustproof
metal, or other material approved by the Department as equivalent;
(C) The information plate shall not be removed by any person; and
(D) The information plate shall be stamped or engraved to show the:
(i) date the pump was installed;
(ii) the depth of the pump intake; and
(iii) the horsepower rating of the pump.
(4) Controlled flow. Every artesian flowing well shall be constructed, equipped and
operated to prevent the unnecessary discharge of water. Flow shall be completely
13
-------
ENR — Environmental Management
15ANCAC.0100
stopped unless the discharge is for beneficial use and only for the duration of that
beneficial use. Flow discharge control shall be provided to conserve the groundwater
resource and prevent or reduce the loss of artesian hydraulic head. Flow control may
consist of valved pipe connections, watertight pump connections, receiving tank,
flowing well pitless adapter, packer or other methods approved by the Department to
prevent the loss of artesian hydraulic head and stop the flow of water as referenced in
G.S. 87-88(d). Well owners are responsible for the operation and maintenance of the
valve.
(5) Pitless adapters or pitless units are allowed as a method of well head completion
under the following conditions:
(A) Design, installation and performance standards are those specified in PAS-
97(04), which is hereby incorporated by reference, including subsequent
amendments and editions, and can be obtained from the Water System
Council National Programs Office, 1101 30th Street, N.W., Suite 500,
Washington, DC 20007 at no cost;
(B) The pitless device is compatible with the well casing;
(C) The top of the pitless unit extends at least 12 inches above land surface;
(D) The excavation surrounding the casing and pitless device is filled with grout
from the top of the casing grout to the land surface; and
(E) The pitless device has an access port.
(6) All openings for piping, wiring, and vents shall enter into the well at least 12 inches
above land surface, except where pitless adapters or pitless units are used, and shall
be adequately sealed to preclude the entrance of contaminants into the well.
History Note: Authority G.S. 87-87; 87-88;
Eff. February 1, 1976;
Amended Eff. May 14, 2001; December 1, 1992; March 1, 1985; September 1, 1984;
April 20, 1978;
Temporary! Amendment Eff. August 3, 2001;
Amended Eff. September 1, 2009; August 1, 2002.
ISA NCAC 02C .0108 STANDARDS OF CONSTRUCTION: WELLS OTHER THAN
WATER SUPPLY
(a) No well shall be located, constructed, operated, or repaired in any manner that may adversely
impact the quality of groundwater.
(b) Injection wells shall conform to the standards set forth in Section .0200 of this Subchapter.
(c) Monitoring wells and recovery wells shall be located, designed, constructed, operated and
abandoned with materials and by methods which are compatible with the chemical and physical
properties of the contaminants involved, specific site conditions and specific subsurface conditions.
(d) Monitoring well and recovery well boreholes shall not penetrate to a depth greater than the depth
to be monitored or the depth from which contaminants are to be recovered. Any portion of the
borehole that extends to a depth greater than the depth to be monitored or the depth from which
contaminants are to be recovered shall be grouted completely to prevent vertical migration of
contaminants.
(e) The well shall not hydraulically connect:
(1) separate aquifers; or
(2) those portions of a single aquifer where contamination occurs in separate and
definable layers within the aquifer.
14
-------
ENR — Environmental Management
15ANCAC.0100
(f) The well construction materials shall be compatible with the depth of the well and any
contaminants to be monitored or recovered.
(g) The well shall be constructed in such a manner that water or contaminants from the land surface
cannot migrate along the borehole annulus into any packing material or well screen area.
(h) In non-water supply wells, packing material placed around the screen shall extend at least one
foot above the top of the screen. Unless the depth of the screen necessitates a thinner seal, a one foot
thick seal, comprised of chip or pellet bentonite or other material approved by the Department as
equivalent, shall be emplaced directly above and in contact with the packing material.
(i) In non-water supply wells, grout shall be placed in the annular space between the outermost
casing and the borehole wall from the land surface to the top of the bentonite seal above any well
screen or to the bottom of the casing for open end wells. The grout shall comply with Paragraph (e)
of Rule .0107 of this Section except that the upper three feet of grout shall be concrete or cement
grout.
(j) All wells shall be grouted within seven days after the casing is set. If the well penetrates any
water-bearing zone that contains contaminated or saline water, the well shall be grouted within one
day after the casing is set.
(k) All non-water supply wells, including temporary wells, shall be secured with a locking well cap
to ensure against unauthorized access and use.
(1) All non-water supply wells shall be equipped with a steel outer well casing or flush-mount cover,
set in concrete, and other measures sufficient to protect the well from damage by normal site
activities.
(m) Any well that would flow under natural artesian conditions shall be valved so that the flow can
be regulated.
(n) In non-water supply wells, the well casing shall be terminated no less than 12 inches above land
surface unless all of the following conditions are met:
(1) site-specific conditions directly related to business activities, such as vehicle traffic,
would endanger the physical integrity of the well; and
(2) the well head is completed in such a manner so as to preclude surficial contaminants
from entering the well.
(o) Each non-water supply well shall have permanently affixed an identification plate. The
identification plate shall be constructed of a durable, waterproof, rustproof metal or other material
approved by the Department as equivalent and shall contain the following information:
(1) well contractor name and certification number;
(2) date well completed;
(3) total depth of well;
(4) a warning that the well is not for water supply and that the groundwater may contain
hazardous materials;
(5) depth(s) to the top(s) and bottom(s) of the screen(s); and
(6) the well identification number or name assigned by the well owner.
(p) Each non-water supply well shall be developed such that the level of turbidity or settleable solids
does not preclude accurate chemical analyses of any fluid samples collected or adversely affect the
operation of any pumps or pumping equipment.
(q) Wells constructed for the purpose of monitoring or testing for the presence of liquids associated
with tanks regulated under 15A NCAC 02N (Criteria and Standards Applicable to Underground
Storage Tanks) shall be constructed in accordance with 15A NCAC 02N .0504.
(r) Wells constructed for the purpose of monitoring for the presence of vapors associated with tanks
regulated under 15A NCAC 02N shall:
(1) be constructed in such a manner as to prevent the entrance of surficial contaminants
or water into or alongside the well casing; and
15
-------
ENR — Environmental Management
15ANCAC.0100
(2) be provided with a lockable cap in order to reasonably ensure against unauthorized
access and use.
(s) Temporary wells and all other non-water supply wells shall be constructed in such a manner as to
preclude the vertical migration of contaminants within and along the borehole channel.
History! Note: Authority G.S. 87-87; 87-88;
Eff. February 1, 1976;
Amended Eff. September 1, 2009, April 1, 2001; December 1, 1992; September 1,
1984; April 20, 1978.
ISA NCAC 02C .0109 PUMPS AND PUMPING EQUIPMENT
(a) The pumping capacity of the pump shall be consistent with the intended use and yield
characteristics of the well.
(b) The pump and related equipment for the well shall be located to permit easy access and removal
for repair and maintenance.
(c) The base plate of a pump placed directly over the well shall be designed to form a watertight seal
with the well casing or pump foundation.
(d) In installations where the pump is not located directly over the well, the annular space between
the casing and pump intake or discharge piping shall be closed with a watertight seal.
(e) The well head shall be equipped with a screened vent to allow for the pressure changes within the
well except if a suction lift pump or single-pipe jet pump is used or artesian, flowing well conditions
are encountered.
(f) The person installing the pump in any water supply well shall install a threadless sampling tap at
the wellhead for obtaining water samples except:
(1) In the case of suction pump or offset jet pump installations the threadless sampling
tap shall be installed on the return (pressure) side of the pump piping, and
(2) In the case of pitless adapter installations, the threadless sampling tap shall be located
immediately upstream of the water storage tank.
(3) If the wellhead is also equipped with a threaded hose bibb in addition to the
threadless sampling tap, the hose bibb shall be fitted with a back flow preventer or
vacuum breaker.
The threadless sampling tap shall be turned downward, located a minimum of 12 inches above land
surface, floor, or well pad, and positioned such that a water sample can be obtained without
interference from any part of the wellhead.
(g) A priming tee shall be installed at the well head in conjunction with offset jet pump installations.
(h) Joints of any suction line installed underground between the well and pump shall be tight under
system pressure.
(i) The drop piping and electrical wiring used in connection with the pump shall meet all applicable
underwriters specifications.
(j) Only potable water shall be used for priming the pump.
History! Note: Authority G.S. 87-87; 87-88;
Eff. February 1, 1976;
Amended Eff. September 1, 2009, December 1, 1992; April 20, 1978.
16
-------
ENR — Environmental Management
15ANCAC.0100
ISA NCAC 02C .0110 WELL TESTS FOR YIELD
(a) Every domestic well shall be tested for capacity by one of the following methods:
(1) Pump Method
(A) select a permanent measuring point, such as the top of the casing;
(B) measure and record the static water level below or above the measuring point
prior to starting the pump;
(C) measure and record the discharge rate at intervals of 10 minutes or less;
(I» measure and record water levels using a steel or electric tape at intervals of 10
minutes or less;
(E) continue the test for a period of at least one hour; and
(F) make measurements within an accuracy of plus or minus one inch.
(2) Bailer Method
(A) select a permanent measuring point, such as the top of the casing;
(B) measure and record the static water level below or above the measuring point
prior to starting the bailing procedure;
(C) bail the water out of the well as rapidly as possible for a period of at least one
hour; determine and record the bailing rate in gallons per minute at the end of
the bailing period; and
CD) measure and record the water level immediately after stopping bailing
process.
(3) Air Rotary Drill Method
(A) measure and record the amount of water being injected into the well during
drilling operations;
(B) measure and record the discharge rate in gallons per minute at intervals of one
hour or less during drilling operations;
(C) after completion of the drilling, continue to blow the water out of the well for
at least 30 minutes and measure and record the discharge rate in gallons per
minute at intervals of 10 minutes or less during the period; and
(D) measure and record the water level immediately after discharge ceases.
(4) Air Lift Method. Measurements shall be made through a pipe placed in the well. The
pipe shall have a minimum inside diameter of at least five-tenths of an inch and shall
extend from top of the well head to a point inside the well that is below the bottom of
the air line.
(A) Measure and record the static water level prior to starting the air compressor;
(B) Measure and record the discharge rate at intervals of 10 minutes or less;
(C) Measure and record the pumping level using a steel or electric tape at
intervals of 10 minutes or less; and
(D) Continue the test for a period of at least one hour.
(b) Public, Industrial and Irrigation Wells. Every industrial or irrigation well and, if required by rule
adopted by the Commission for Public Health, every well serving a public water supply system upon
completion, shall be tested for capacity by the following or equivalent method:
(1) The water level in the well to be pumped and any observation wells shall be
measured and recorded prior to starting the test.
(2) The well shall be tested by a pump of sufficient size and lift capacity to test the yield
of the well, consistent with the well diameter and purpose.
(3) The pump shall be equipped with sufficient throttling devices to reduce the discharge
rate to approximately 25 percent of the maximum capacity of the pump.
(4) The test shall be conducted for a period of at least 24 hours without interruption and,
except for wells constructed in Coastal Plain aquifers, shall be continued for a period
17
-------
ENR — Environmental Management
15ANCAC.0100
of at least four hours after the pumping water level stabilizes (ceases to decline). If
the total water requirements for wells not serving a public water supply system are
less than 100,000 gpd, the well shall be tested for a period and in a manner to show
the capacity of the well, or that the capacity of the well is sufficient to meet the
intended purpose.
(5) The pump discharge shall be set at a constant rate or rates that can be maintained
throughout the testing period. If the well is tested at two or more pumping rates (a
step-drawdown test), pumping at each pumping rate shall continue to the point that
the pumping water level declines no more than 0.1 feet per hour for a period of at
least four hours for each pumping rate, except for wells constructed in Coastal Plain
aquifers. In wells constructed in Coastal Plain aquifers, pumping at each pumping
rate shall continue for at least four hours.
(6) The pump discharge rate shall be measured by an orifice meter, flowmeter, weir, or
equivalent metering device. The metering device shall have an accuracy within plus
or minus five percent.
(7) The discharge rate of the pump and time shall be measured and recorded at intervals
of 10 minutes or less during the first two hours of the pumping period for each
pumping rate. If the pumping rate is relatively constant after the first two hours of
pumping, discharge measurements and recording may be made at longer time
intervals but not to exceed one hour.
(8) The water level in each well and time shall be measured and recorded at intervals of
five minutes or less during the first hour of pumping and at intervals of 10 minutes or
less during the second hour of pumping. After the second hour of pumping, the water
level in each well shall be measured at such intervals that the lowering of the
pumping water level does not exceed three inches between measurements.
(9) A reference point for water level measurements (preferably the top of the casing)
shall be selected and recorded for the pumping well and each observation well to be
measured during the test. All water level measurements shall be made from the
selected reference points.
(10) All water level measurements shall be made with a steel or electric tape or equivalent
measuring device.
(11) All water level measurements shall be made within an accuracy of plus or minus one
inch.
(12) After the completion of the pumping period, measurements of the water level
recovery rate in the pumped well shall be made for a period of at least two hours in
the same manner as the drawdown.
History Note: Authority G.S. 87-87; 87-88;
Eff. February 1, 1976;
Amended Eff. Septemberl, 2009, April 1, 2001; December 1, 1992; September 1,
1984; April 20, 1978.
18
-------
ENR — Environmental Management
15ANCAC.0100
ISA NCAC 02C .0111 DISINFECTION OF WATER SUPPLY WELLS
(a) Any person constructing, repairing, testing, or performing maintenance, or installing a pump in a
water supply well shall disinfect the well upon completion of construction, repairs, testing,
maintenance, or pump installation.
(b) Any person disinfecting a well shall perform disinfection in accordance with the following
procedures:
(1) Chlorination.
(A) Hypochlorite shall be placed in the well in sufficient quantities to produce a
chlorine residual of at least 100 parts per million (ppm) in the well.
Stabilized chlorine tablets or hypochlorite products containing fungicides,
algaecides, or other disinfectants shall not be used. Chlorine test strips or
other quantitative test methods shall be used to confirm the concentration of
the chlorine residual.
[Note: About three ounces of hypochlorite containing 65 percent to 75
percent available chlorine is needed per 100 gallons of water for at least a 100
ppm chlorine residual. As an example, a well having a diameter of six inches,
has a volume of about 1.5 gallons per foot. If the well has 200 feet of water,
the minimum amount of hypochlorite required would be 9 ounces. (1.5
gallons/foot x 200 feet = 300 gallons at 3 ounces per 100 gallons; 3 ounces x
3 = 9 ounces.)]
(B) The hypochlorite shall be placed in the well by one of the following or
equivalent methods:
(i) Granular hypochlorite may be dropped in the top of the well and
allowed to settle to the bottom; or
(ii) Hypochlorite solutions shall be placed in the bottom of the well by
using a bailer or by pouring the solution through the drill rod, hose, or
pipe placed in the bottom of the well. The solution shall be flushed
out of the drill rod, hose, or pipe by using water or air.
(C) The water in the well shall be agitated or circulated to ensure thorough
dispersion of the chlorine.
(D) The well casing, pump column and any other equipment above the water level
in the well shall be rinsed with the chlorine solution as a part of the
disinfecting process.
(E) The chlorine solution shall stand in the well for a period of at least 24 hours.
(F) The well shall be pumped until there is no detectable total chlorine residual in
water pumped from the well before the well is placed in use.
(2) Other materials and methods of disinfection, at least as effective as those in
Subparagraph (1) of this Paragraph, may be used upon prior approval by the
Department.
History Note: Authority G.S. 87-87; 87-88;
Eff. February 1, 1976;
Amended Eff. September 1, 2009, April 1, 2001; December 1, 1992; July 1, 1988;
September 1, 1984.
19
-------
ENR — Environmental Management
15ANCAC.0100
ISA NCAC 02C .0112 WELL MAINTENANCE: REPAIR: GROUNDWATER
RESOURCES
(a) Every well shall be maintained by the owner in a condition whereby it will conserve and protect
the groundwater resources, and whereby it will not be a source or channel of contamination or
pollution to the water supply or any aquifer, or the well shall be permanently abandoned in
accordance with the requirements of 15A NCAC 02C .0113(b).
(b) Dewatering wells shall be permanently abandoned in accordance with the requirements of 15A
NCAC 02C .0113(b) within 30 days of completion of the dewatering activity.
(c) All materials used in the maintenance, replacement, or repair of any well shall meet the
requirements for new installation.
(d) Broken, punctured or otherwise defective or unserviceable casing, screens, fixtures, seals, or any
part of the well head shall be repaired or replaced, or the well shall be permanently abandoned
pursuant to the requirements of Rule .0113(b) of this Section.
(e) NSF International (NSF) approved PVC pipe rated at 160 PSI may be used for liner pipe. The
annular space around the liner casing shall be at least five-eighths inches and shall be completely
filled with neat-cement grout or sand cement grout. The well liner shall be completely grouted
within 10 working days after collection of water samples or completion of other testing to confirm
proper placement of the liner or within 10 working days after the liner has been installed if no
sampling or testing is performed.
(f) No well shall be repaired or altered such that the outer casing is completed less than 12 inches
above land surface. Any grout excavated or removed as a result of the well repair shall be replaced in
accordance with Rule .0107(f) of this Section.
(g) Well rehabilitation by noncontinuous chemical treatment shall be conducted using methods and
materials approved by the Department based on a demonstration that the materials and methods used
will not create a violation of groundwater standards in 15A NCAC 02L or otherwise render the
groundwater unsuitable for its intended best usage after completion of the rehabilitation.
History Note: Authority G.S. 87-87; 87-88;
Eff. February.> 1, 1976;
Amended Eff. September 1, 2009, August I, 2002; April 1, 2001; December 1, 1992;
September 1, 1984.
ISA NCAC 02C .0113 ABANDONMENT OF WELLS
(a) Any well which is temporarily removed from service shall be temporarily abandoned in
accordance with the following procedures:
(1) The well shall be sealed with a water-tight cap or well seal, as defined in G.S. 87-85
(16), compatible with the casing and installed so that it cannot be removed without
the use of hand tools or power tools.
(2) The well shall be maintained whereby it is not a source or channel of contamination
during temporary abandonment.
(b) Permanent abandonment of water supply wells other than bored or hand dug wells shall be
performed in accordance with the following procedures:
(1) All casing and screen materials may be removed prior to initiation of abandonment
procedures if such removal will not cause or contribute to contamination of the
groundwaters. Any casing not grouted in accordance with 15A NCAC 02C .0107(f)
shall be removed or grouted in accordance with 15A NCAC 02C .0107(f).
(2) The entire depth of the well shall be sounded before it is sealed to ensure freedom
from obstructions that may interfere with sealing operations.
20
-------
ENR — Environmental Management
15ANCAC.0100
(3) Except in the case of temporary wells and monitoring wells, the well shall be
disinfected in accordance with Rule .0111(b)(1)(A) through .0111(b)(1)(C) of this
Section.
(4) In the case of gravel-packed wells in which the casing and screens have not been
removed, neat-cement or bentonite slurry grout shall be injected into the well
completely filling it from the bottom of the casing to the top.
(5) Wells constructed in unconsolidated formations shall be completely filled with grout
by introducing it through a pipe extending to the bottom of the well which can be
raised as the well is filled.
(6) Wells constructed in consolidated rock formations or that penetrate zones of
consolidated rock may be filled with grout, sand, gravel or drill cuttings opposite the
zones of consolidated rock. The top of any sand, gravel or cutting fill shall terminate
at least 10 feet below the top of the consolidated rock or five feet below the bottom of
casing. Grout shall be placed beginning 10 feet below the top of the consolidated
rock or five feet below the bottom of casing in a manner to ensure complete filling of
the casing, and extend up to land surface. For any well in which the depth of casing
or the depth of the bedrock is not known or cannot be confirmed, the entire length of
the well shall be filled with grout up to land surface.
(c) For bored wells or hand dug water supply wells constructed into unconsolidated material:
(1) The well shall be disinfected in accordance with Rule .0111(b)(1)(A) through
.0111(b)(1)(C) of this Section.
(2) All plumbing or piping in the well and any other obstructions inside the well shall be
removed from the well.
(3) The uppermost three feet of well casing shall be removed from the well.
(4) All soil or other subsurface material present down to the top of the remaining well
casing shall be removed, including the material extending to a width of at least 12
inches outside of the well casing.
(5) The well shall be filled to the top of the remaining casing with grout, dry clay, or
material excavated during construction of the well. If dry clay or material excavated
during construction of the well is used, it shall be emplaced in lifts no more than five
feet thick, each compacted in place prior to emplacement of the next lift.
(6) A six-inch thick concrete grout plug shall be placed on top of the remaining casing
such that it covers the entire excavated area above the top of the casing, including the
area extending to a width of at least 12 inches outside the well casing.
(7) The remainder of the well above the concrete plug shall be filled with grout or soil.
(d) All wells other than water supply wells including temporary wells, monitoring wells or test
borings:
(1) less than 20 feet in depth and which do not penetrate the water table shall be
abandoned by filling the entire well up to land surface with grout, dry clay, or
material excavated during drilling of the well and then compacted in place; and
(2) greater than 20 feet in depth or that penetrate the water table shall be abandoned by
completely filling with a bentonite or cement-type grout.
(e) Any well which acts as a source or channel of contamination shall be repaired or permanently
abandoned within 30 days of receipt of notice from the Department.
(f) All wells shall be permanently abandoned in which the casing has not been installed or from
which the casing has been removed, prior to removing drilling equipment from the site.
(g) The owner is responsible for permanent abandonment of a well except that:
21
-------
ENR — Environmental Management
15ANCAC.0100
(1) the well contractor is responsible for well abandonment if abandonment is required
because the well contractor improperly locates, constructs, repairs or completes the
well;
(2) the person who installs, repairs or removes the well pump is responsible for well
abandonment if that abandonment is required because of improper well pump
installation, repair or removal; or
(3) the well contractor (or individual) who conducts a test boring is responsible for its
abandonment at the time the test boring is completed and has fulfilled its useful
purpose.
History Note: Authority G.S. 87-87; 87-88;
Eff. February 1, 1976;
Amended Eff September 1, 2009, April 1, 2001; December 1, 1992; September 1,
1984; April 20, 1978.
15A NCAC 02 C .0114 DATA AND RECORDS REQUIRED
(a) Well Cuttings.
(1) The well contractor shall collect and furnish samples of formation cuttings to the
Division from a well the well contractor has drilled when such samples are requested
by the Division prior to completion of the drilling or boring activities.
(2) The well contractor shall obtain samples or representative cuttings for depth intervals
not exceeding 10 feet. The well contractor shall also collect representative cuttings at
depths of each change in formation.
(3) The well contractor shall place samples of cuttings in containers furnished by the
Division and such containers shall be filled, sealed and labeled with indelible-type
markers, showing the well owner, well number if applicable, and depth interval the
sample represents.
(4) The well contractor shall place each set of samples in a container(s) showing the
location, owner, well number if applicable, the well contractor's name, depth interval,
and date.
(5) The well contractor shall retain samples until delivery instructions are received from
the Division or for a period of at least 60 days after the well record form (GW-1),
indicating said samples are available, has been received by the Division.
(6) If the well contractor furnishes samples to any person or agency other than the
Division, this does not constitute compliance with the department's request and shall
not relieve the well contractor of his or her obligation to the Division.
(b) Reports.
(1) Any person completing or abandoning any well shall submit to the Division a record
of the construction or abandonment. For water supply wells, a copy of each
completion or abandonment record shall also be submitted to the health department
responsible for the county in which the well is located. The record shall be on forms
provided by the Division and shall include certification that construction or
abandonment was completed as required by this Section, the owner's name and
address, latitude and longitude of the well with a position accuracy of 100 feet or less,
diameter, depth, yield, and any other information the Division may require as
necessary to depict the location and construction details of the well.
(2) The certified record of completion or abandonment shall be submitted within a period
of 30 days after completion or abandonment.
22
-------
ENR — Environmental Management
15ANCAC.0100
(3) The furnishing of records to any person or agency other than the Division does not
constitute compliance with the reporting requirement and shall not relieve the well
contractor of his or her obligation to the Division.
History Note: Authority G.S. 87-87; 87-88;
Eff. February 1, 1976;
Amended Eff. September 1, 2009; April 1, 2001; December 1, 1992; September 1,
1984; April 20, 1978.
ISA NCAC 02C .0115 DIAGRAMS AND FORMS
History Note; Authority G.S. 87-87;
Eff. February 1, 1976;
Amended Eff. April 20, 1978;
Repealed Eff. September 1, 1984.
ISA NCAC 02C .0116 DESIGNATED AREAS: WATER SUPPLY WELLS CASED TO
LESS THAN 20 FEET
(a) In some areas the best or only source of potable water supply exists between 10 and 20 feet
below the surface of the land. In consideration of this, water supply wells may be cased to a depth
less than twenty feet in the following areas:
(1) in Currituck County in an area between the sound and a line beginning at the end of
SR 1130 near Currituck Sound, thence north to the end of SR 1133, thence north to
the end of NC 136 at the intersection with the sound;
(2) on the Outer Banks from the northern corporate limit of Nags Head, south to
Ocracoke Inlet;
(3) all areas lying between the Intracoastal Waterway and the ocean from New River
Inlet south to New Topsail Inlet; and
(4) all areas lying between the Intracoastal Waterway and the ocean from the Cape Fear
River south to the South Carolina line.
(b) The Director may designate additional areas of the state where water supply wells may be cased
to a depth less than 20 feet. To designate such areas, the Director shall find:
(1) that the only or best source of drinking water in the area exists between a depth of 10
and 20 feet below the surface of the land; and
(2) at utilization of this source of water in the area is in the best interest of the public.
(c) In all other areas, the source of water shall be at least 20 feet below land surface, except when
adequate quantities of potable water cannot be obtained below a depth of 20 feet, the source of water
may be obtained from unconsolidated rock formations at depths less than 20 feet provided that:
(1) sufficient water of acceptable quality for the intended use can be shown, to the
satisfaction of the Department that it is not available to a minimum depth of 50 feet;
(2) the proposed source of water is the maximum feasible depth above 20 feet, but in no
case less than 10 feet; and
(3) the regional office of the Department is notified prior to the construction of a well
obtaining water from a depth between 10 and 20 feet below land surface.
History Note; Authority G.S. 87-87;
Eff. April 20, 1978;
Amended Eff. September 1, 2009, December 1, 1992; July 1, 1988; September 1,
1984.
23
-------
ENR — Environmental Management
15ANCAC.0100
ISA NCAC 02C .0117 DESIGNATED AREAS: WATER SUPPLY WELLS CASED TO
MINIMUM DEPTH OF 35 FEET
Water supply wells constructed in the following areas or within 400 feet of the following areas shall
be cased to a minimum depth of 35 feet:
(1) Anson County generally west of a line beginning at the intersection of the runs of the
Pee Dee River and Buffalo Creek, thence generally northeast to SR 1627, thence
generally south along SR 1627 to the intersection with SR 1632, thence generally
west along SR 1632 to the intersection with US 52, thence generally south along US
52 to the intersection with SR 1418, thence generally southwest along SR 1418 to the
intersection of NC 218, thence south along NC 218 to the intersection with US 74,
thence generally west along US 74 to the intersection of SR 1251, thence generally
southwest along SR 1251 to the intersection with SR 1240, thence generally southeast
along SR 1240 to the intersection with SR 1252, thence generally south along SR
1252 to the intersection with SR 1003, thence generally west along SR 1003 to the
Union County line;
(2) Cabarrus County generally east of a line beginning at the intersection of SR 1113 and
the Union County line, thence generally northeast along SR 1113 to the intersection
with SR 1114, thence generally east along SR 1114 to the Stanly County line, thence
generally northeast along the county line to the intersection with SR 1100, thence
generally northeast along SR 1100 to the intersection of with SR 2622, thence
generally southeast along SR 2622 to the intersection with SR 2617, thence generally
northeast along SR 2617 to the intersection with SR 2611, thence generally north
along SR 2611 to the intersection with NC 73, thence generally east along NC 73 to
the intersection with SR 2453, thence generally northeast along SR 2453 to the
intersection with SR 2444, thence generally northeast along SR 2444 to the Rowan
County line;
(3) Davidson County generally east of a line starting at the intersection of the runs of
Abbotts Creek and the Yadkin River in High Rock Lake, thence generally north
along Abbotts Creek to NC 8 bridge, thence generally north along NC 8 to the
intersection with Interstate 85, thence generally northeast along Interstate 85 to the
intersection with US 64, thence generally southeast along US 64 to the Randolph
County line;
(4) Montgomery County generally west of a line beginning at the intersection of SR 1134
with the Randolph County line, thence generally south along SR 1134 to the
intersection with SR 1303, thence generally south along SR 1303 to the intersection
with NC 109, thence generally southeast along NC 109 to the intersection with SR
1150, thence generally south along SR 1150 to the intersection with NC 73, thence
generally southeast along NC 73 to the intersection with SR 1227, thence generally
east along SR 1227 to the intersection with SR 1130, thence generally northeast along
SR 1130 to the intersection with SR 1132, thence generally southeast along SR 1132
to the intersection with SR 1174, thence generally east along SR 1.174 to the
intersection with NC 109, thence generally north along NC 109 to the intersection
with SR 1546, generally southeast along SR 1546 to the intersection of SR 1543,
thence generally south along SR 1543 to the intersection with NC 731, thence
generally west along NC 731 to the intersection with SR 1118, thence generally
southwest along SR 1118 to the intersection with SR 1116, thence generally west
along SR 1116 to the intersection with NC 109, thence generally south along NC 109
to the intersection with the Richmond County line;
24
-------
ENR — Environmental Management
15ANCAC.0100
(5) Randolph County generally west of a line beginning at the intersection of US 64 with
the Davidson County line, thence generally east along US 64 to the intersection with
NC 49, thence generally southwest along NC 49 to the intersection with SR 1107,
thence generally south along SR 1107 to the intersection with SR 1105, thence
southeast along SR 1105 to the intersection with the Montgomery County line;
(6) Rowan County generally east of a line beginning at the intersection of SR 2352 with
the Cabarrus County line, thence generally northeast along SR 2352 to the
intersection with SR 2353, thence generally north along SR 2353 to the intersection
with SR 2259, thence generally northeast along SR 2259 to the intersection with SR
2142, thence north along SR 2142 to the intersection with SR 2162, thence generally
northeast along SR 2162 to the intersection with the run of the Yadkin River in High
Rock Lake;
(7) Union County generally east of a line beginning at the intersection of SR 1117 with
the South Carolina-North Carolina State line, thence generally north along SR 1117
to the intersection with SR 1111, thence generally northwest along SR 1111 to the
intersection with NC 75, thence generally northwest along NC 75 to the intersection
with NC 16, thence generally north along NC 16 to the intersection with SR 1008,
thence generally northeast along SR 1008 to the intersection with SR 1520, thence
generally northeast along SR 1520 to the intersection with NC 218, thence generally
east along NC 218 to the intersection with US 601, thence generally north along US
601 to the intersection with SR 1600, thence generally northeast along SR 1600 to the
intersection with the Cabarrus County line;
(8) Stanly County — all.
History Note: Authority G.S. 87-87;
Eff. April 20, 1978;
Amended Eff. September 1, 2009, April 1, 2001.
ISA NCAC 02C .0118 VARIANCE
(a) The Secretary may grant a variance from any construction standard under the rules of this
Section. Any variance shall be in writing, and shall be granted upon oral or written application to the
Secretary, by the person responsible for the construction of the well for which the variance is sought,
if the Secretary finds facts to support the following conclusions:
(1) that the use of the well will not endanger human health and welfare or the
groundwater;
(2) that construction in accordance with the standards was not technically feasible in such
a manner as to afford a reasonable water supply at a reasonable cost.
(b) The Secretary may require the variance applicant to submit such information as the Secretary
deems necessary to make a decision to grant or deny the variance. The Secretary may impose such
conditions on a variance or the use of a well for which a variance is granted as he deems necessary to
protect human health and welfare and the groundwater resources. The findings of fact supporting
any variance under this Rule shall be in writing and made part of the variance.
(c) The Secretary shall respond in writing to a request for a variance within 30 days from the receipt
of the variance request.
(d) A variance applicant who is dissatisfied with the decision of the Secretary may commence a
contested case by filing a petition under G.S. 150B-23 within 60 days after receipt of the decision.
25
-------
ENR — Environmental Management
15ANCAC.0100
History Note: Authority G.S. 87-87; 87-88; 150B-23
Eff. April 20, 1978;
Amended Eff. September 1, 2009, April 1, 2001; December 1, 1992; September 1,
1988; September 1, 1984.
15A NCAC 02C .0119 DELEGATION
(a) The Secretary is delegated the authority to grant permission for well construction under G.S.
87-87.
(b) The Secretary is delegated the authority to give notices and sign orders for violations under G.S.
87-91.
(c) The Secretary may grant a variance from any construction standard, or the approval of alternate
construction methods or materials, specified under the Rules of this Section.
History Note: Authority G.S. 143-215.3(a)(1);
Eff. March 1, 1985;
Amended Eff. October 1, 2009, December 1, 1992.
26
-------
APPENDIX K
DECLARATION OF PERPETU AL LAND USE RESTRICTIONS
K-1
-------
50c ID: 012781440016TypeCRP
Kind; RESTRICTION
Recorded: 12/03/2009 at 02:57:22 Pn
®59-°0 Page J of 16
Iredell Countv, wc
flrenda D, Bell Register of Deeds
«2040»161-176
DOCUMENT COVER SHEET
/t
Document TKle(s)(or transactions contained therein): ^ _
0£L
-------
ORIGINAL RECORDED
WITH COVER SHEET
DECLARATION OF PERPETUAL LAND USE RESTRICTIONS
FOR A FEDERAL SUPERFUND SITE
For Property Owned By: Sun Associates, L.L.C,
For a Portion of the FCX-Statesville Superfund Site, Iredell County, North Carolina
The real property (hereinafter referred to as the "Property") which is the subject of this
Declaration of Perpetual Land Use Restrictions ("Declaration") is contaminated with hazardous
substances, pollutants, or contaminants and is a portion of the FCX Statesville Superfund Site
(hereinafter referred to as the "Site"), under the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act, as amended ("CERCLA/SARA"), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq. The
Site, including the Property, is the subject of a Record of Decision ("ROD") issued by Ihe United
States Environmental Protection Agency ("USEPA") in September 1993 for Operable Unit
("OIF) 1 of the Site; a ROD issued in November 1993 for OU 2 of the Site; a ROD issued in
September 1996 for OU 3 of the Site; an Amended ROD issued in September 2006 for OU 1; an
Explanation of Significant Difference issued in September 2006 for OU 3; and a Consent
Decree for OU3 that was filed in civil action no. 5:97CV198-V in the United States District
Court for ihe Western District of North Carolina, entitled "United States of America, Plaintiff, v.
Beaunit Corporation; Burlington Industries, Inc.; and El Paso Natural Gas Company, dfh/a El
Paso Energy Corporation, Defendants." The land use restrictions set forth in this Declaration
are included in the remedial action plan for the Property and are identified in the Amended ROD
issued September 2006 for OU 1 that has been approved by the Secretary of the North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources (or its successor in function), or his/her
delegate, as authorized by N.C.G.S. Section 143B-279.9. The North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources shall hereinafter be referred to as "DENR."
SUN ASSOCIATES, LLC, Mocksville, North Carolina, is the owner in fee simple of the
Property, which is a portion of the Site, and which is located at 1620 West Front Street in the
City of Statesville Iredell County, State of North Carolina, 2S677. The Property is legally
described in Exhibits A, B, C and D attached hereto which legal descriptions are contained in
Deed Book 131, Page 538, Deed Book 429, Page 312, Deed Book 457, Page 452, and Deed
Book 457, Page 454 respectively in the Office of the Register of Deeds for Iredell County. The
Property is also shown on a Notice of Contaminated Site, constituting a survey plat that is
concurrently being recorded with this Declaration in the Office of the Register of Deeds for
Iredell County at Map Book » Page ^ ! • An unrecorded copy of said survey plat is
attached hereto as Exhibit E.
For the purpose of protecting public health and the environment, SUN ASSOCIATES,
LLC, hereby declares that the Property shall be held, sold and conveyed subject to the following
perpetual land use restrictions, which shall ran with the land; shall be binding on all parties
having any right, title or interest in the Property or any part thereof, their heirs, successors and
assigns; and shall, as provided in N.C.G.S. Section 143B-279.9, be enforceable without regard to
lack of privity of estate or contract, lack of benefit to particular land, or lack of any property
interest in particular land. These restrictions shall continue in perpetuity and cannot be amended
or canceled unless and until the Iredell County Register of Deeds receives and records the
Book: 2040 Page: 161 Page 2 of 16
K-3
-------
written concurrence of the Secretary of DENR (or its successor in function), or his/her delegate
of modification or cancellation of these restrictions and this Declaration,
If any provision of this Declaration is found to be unenforceable in any respect, the
validity, legality, and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not in any way be affected
or impaired.
It is the intention of SUN ASSOCIATES, LLC, and DENR that, to the extent allowed by
law, USEPA is a third party beneficiary of the-Declaration, and, as such, has the authority to
enforce these restrictions, to the extent such enforcement is allowed by law. It is expressly
agreed that neither USEPA nor DENR is a recipient of a real property interest under this
Declaration.
PERPETUAL LAND USE RESTRICTIONS
1. Groundwater beneath the Property shall riot be used for any purpose. The installation
of ground water wells or other devices for access to groundwater for any purpose other than
monitoring ground water quality or conducting a remedial and/or removal response action on the
Property is prohibited without prior approval in writing from DENR, or its successor in function,
2. The Property shall not be used for mining, extraction of coal, oil, gas or any other
minerals or non-mineral substances.
3. Remediation equipment, including groundwater monitoring wells, installed at
Property shall not be moved, removed, destroyed, altered or disturbed in any way without the
prior approval in writing from DENR.
4. The owners) of any portion of the Property shall submit a letter report, containing the
notarized signature of the owner(s), in January of each year on or before January 31s1, to DENR
and the USEPA, or their successors in function, confirming that this Declaration is still recorded
in the Office of the Iredell County Register of Deeds and that activities and conditions at the
Property remain in compliance with the land use restrictions herein,
5. No persons conducting environmental assessment or remediation at the Property, or
involved in determining compliance with applicable land use restrictions, at the direction of, or
pursuant to a permit or order issued by DENR, its successor in function, or USEPA, or El Paso
Natural Gas Company ("EPNG") or any assignee of EPNG, may be denied access to the
Property for the purpose of conducting such activities. Such activities may include, but are not
limited to, (1) assessment and remedial and/or removal response actions until remediation levels
contained in the QUI and OU3 RODs are obtained, including, but not limited to, sampling
existing ground water monitoring wells, installing new ground water monitoring wells, taking
soil samples, and installing such remediation equipment and facilities as may be necessitated by
the OU1 and OU3 RODs and any amendments or explanation of significant differences thereto;
and (2) soil vapor intrusion assessment and/or response actions related to any unacceptable soil
vapor intrusion levels on the Property,
Book: 2040 Page: 161 Page 3 of 18
K-4
-------
6. The owner(s) of any portion of the Property which is the subject of this Declaration
shall cause any lease, grant, or other transfer of any interest in the Property to include a provision
expressly requiring the lessee, grantee, or transferee to comply with this Declaration. The failure
to include such provision shall not affect the validity or applicability of any land use restriction
in this Declaration.
7, The owner(s) of any portion of the Property that is the subject of this Declaration may
submit a written request to the Secretary of DENR for modification or cancellation of these
restrictions. DENR will concur with and grant such request for modification if DENR
determines, based upon a showing by the owner, that the modification is justified. DENR will
concur with and grant such request for cancellation if DENR determines, based upon a showing
by the owner, that all contaminants of concern that are the subject of the OUI and OU3 RODs
and any amendments or explanation of significant differences thereto at the Site have been
eliminated or remediated to unrestricted use standards pursuant to N.C.G.S. Section 143B-
279.9(d), or, if no unrestricted use standard pursuant to 143B-279.9(d) is applicable to a
contaminant of concern, then upon achievement of the Cleanup Standards with respect to that
contaminant of concern. If DENR concurs with any such modification or cancellation, it shall
submit such written concurrence to the Iredell County Register of Deeds. The owner of the
Property must provide written notification to the US EPA that it is requesting a modification or
cancellation of the restrictions at the same time its request is submitted to DENR.
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
SUN ASSOCIATES, LLC, hereby represents and warrants to the other signatories hereto,
that:
it holds fee simple title to the Property subject to the interests or encumbrances identified in
Exhibits A, B, and C attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein;
it has the power and authority to enter into this Declaration, to grant the rights and interests
herein provided and to carry out all obligations hereunder;
it has provided to DENR and USEPA the names of all other persons that own an interest in or
hold an encumbrance on the Property.
it knows of no conflict between the restrictions and requirements set forth in this Declaration and
any other interest in or encumbrances on the Property and it has not obtained subordination
agreements
this Declaration will not materially violate or contravene or constitute a material default under
any other agreement, document or instrument to which it is a party or by which it may be bound
or affected.
ENFORCEMENT
Book; 2040 Page: 161 Page 4 of 16
K-5
-------
The above land use restrictions are an integral part of the remedy for the contamination at
the Property. Adherence lo the restrictions is necessary to protect public health and the
environment. These land use restrictions shall be enforced by any owner, operator or other party
legally responsible for any part of the Property. The above land use restrictions may also be
enforced by DBNR through the remedies provided by any provision of law that is implemented
or enforced by DENR or by means of a civil action, and may also be enforced by any unit of
local government having jurisdiction over any part of the Property, and by USEPA to the extent
allowed by law. Any attempt to cancel this Declaration without the approval of DENR or its
successor in function shall constitute noncompliance with USEPA's Record of Decisions for the
Site, which includes the Property, and any amendments thereto, which have been approved by
DENR, and shall be subject to enforcement by DENR and/or, to the extent allowed by law, by
USEPA. Failure by any party required or authorized to enforce any of the above restrictions
shall in no event be deemed a waiver of the right to do so thereafter as to the same violation or as
lo one occurring prior or subsequent thereto.
FUTURE SALES, LEASES, CONVEYANCES AND TRANSFERS
When any portion of the Property is sold, leased, conveyed or transferred, pursuant to
N.C.G.S. Section 143B-279.10(e) the deed or other instrument of transfer shall contain in the
description section, in no smaller type than that used in the body of the deed or instrument, a
statement that the real property being sold, leased, conveyed, or transferred is a Contaminated
Site and a reference by book and page to the recordation of the Notice of Contaminated Site
referenced in the second paragraph of this Declaration.
MODIFICATION OR CANCELLATION OF NOTICE OF CONTAMINATED SITE
The owner of the Property that is the subject of this Declaration may also submit a
written request to the Secretary of DENR that the Notice of Contaminated Site ("survey plat") be
modified or cancelled. DENR will concur with and grant such request for modification if DENR
determines, based upon a showing by the owner, that the modification is justified. DENR will
concur with and grant such request for cancellation if DENR determines, based upon a showing
by the owner, that all contaminants of concern that are the subject of the Record of Decisions and
amendments thereto at the Property have been eliminated or remediated to unrestricted use
standards pursuant to N.C.G.S. Section 143B~279.9(d) or, if no unrestricted use standard
pursuant to N.C.G.S. Section 143B-279.9(d) is applicable to a contaminant of concern, then upon
achievement of the Cleanup Standards with respect to that contaminant of concern. If DENR
concurs with any such modification or cancellation, it shall submit such written concurrence to
the Iredell County Register of Deeds. The owner of the Property must provide written
notification to USEPA that it is requesting a modification or cancellation of the survey plat at the
same time its request is submitted to DENR.
K-6
Book: 2040 Page: 161 Page 5 of 16
-------
OWNERS' SIGNATURE
FN WITNESS WHEREOF, I, Roger Spiilman, exercising power of attorney for SUN
ASSOCIATES, LLC, have executed this Declaration on this ^ day of &*jJ2009.
Signatory's name; Roger Spiilman
For SUN ASSOCIATES, LLC,
si"' ^ p
&
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF
piIIman personally appeared befi
a Notary Public, do hereby certify that
Roger Spiilman personally appeared before me this day and declared that he is the Manager of
SUN ASSOCIATES, LLC and that by authority duly given, and as the act of SUN
ASSOCIATES, LLC, he has signed this Declaration,
WITNESS my hand and official seal thisj3 day of
My Commission expires
:£z32-125
, 2009.
[SEAL]
KELLY B. GAtANTIS
Notary Public
Johnston CountvJMC
My Commission Expires ft-*? '-P
Book: 2040 Page; 181 Page 6 of 16
K-7
-------
APPROVAL AND CERTIFICATION OF THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT
OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
The foregoing Declaration of Perpetual Land Use Restrictions is hereby approved and
certified this?w/day of, 2009.
By:
Jack Butler, Chief
Superfund Section
Division of Waste Management
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
county of .Nnhr^teO
I, fe-£>rx-kXa^'.S »a Notary Public, do hereby certify thai
P^.jl4-UlT" personally appeared before me this day,
produced proper identification in the form of Of rtof » and signed this
Declaration,
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of CUT ¦ , 2000.
5 fv QoDclaJS
(P r\ —|
My Commission expires: % -q/ I ~ Lz>
tary Public
[SEAL]
KELLY B. GALAMTIS
Notary Public
Johnston Count^N^ ^
My Commission Expires,
K-8
Book: 2040 Page: 161 Page 7 of 16
-------
REGISTER OF DEEDS CERTIFICATION
The foregoing Declaration of Perpetual Land Use Restrictions is certified to be duly
recorded at the date and time, and the Book and Page, shown on the first page hereof.
"5W/
Register of Deeds for Iredell County
By;
(sigmture)<£/
?gr,. r g», -a„„,
(type or print name and title) '
K-9
Book: 2040 Page: 161 Page 8 of 16
-------
. A
A
Beginning in the center of the intersection of the Taylorsville-Statesville hard surface
Highway and Phoenix Avenue, and runs with the center of Phoenix Avenue N, 3 cleg, 15
min. E about 350 feet to the center of the main track of the Southern Railway Company,
moiling from Statesviile to TaylorsviJJc; thence N. 61 cleg. 19 min. W. with the center of said
main track about 660 feet to the corner of the State Farm and Iredell Development
Company; thence S. 3 cleg, 15 min. W. about 25 feet to an iron stake; thence S. fit deg. 38
min, E. 132 feet to an iron stake, comer of the Crawford Land; thence S. 23 deg. 17 min. W.
about 272 feet to the center of the Taylorsville-Statesville hard surface Highway; thence with
the center of said Highway in a southesterly direction about 645 feet to the beginning, it
being all of Block A of the T. D. Miller property, a plat of which is recorded in Map Book 2,
page 17, of the records of the Register of Deeds for Iredell County, North Carolina, said
lands "being subject, however, to the rights of way of the Southern Railway Company, and
the Taylors villc-S ta tesville hard surface Highway, and Phoenix Avenue, and subject, further,
to the right of way of a water line along the northern edge of the Taylorsville-Statesville
Highway.
BEGINNING, in the center of the intersection of the Taylorsville-Statesville hard surface
highway and Phoenix Avenue, and runs with the center of Phoenix Avenue N. 3° 15' E.
about 350 feet to an iron stake in the center of the main track of the Southern Railway
Company, running from Statesviile to TaylorsviUe; thence N. 61° 19* W. with the center of
the said railroad tract 279 3/10 feet to an iron stake in the center of the said railroad tract;
thence S. 11° 30* W, 276 feet to the center of the Taylorsville-Statesville hard-surface
highway; thence with the center of the said highway S. 57 E. 150 feet; thence S. 54 E. 189
feet to the beginning comer, the same being the eastern portion of Block A of the T.D.
Miller property, a plat of which is recorded in Map Book 2, Page 17, of the records of the
Register of Deeds for Iredell County, N.C., said lands being subject, however, to the rights
of way of the Southern Railway Company and the Taylorsville-Statesville hard-surface
highway, and Phoenix Avenue, and subject further to the right of way of a water line along
the northern edge of the Statesville-Taylorsville highway, this being a part of the tract of land
conveyed by the heirs of T. D. Miller to the Farmers Cooperative Exchange, Inc., by deed
dated November 25, 1938.
Said deed from Cooperative Mills, Inc., to FCX, Inc., recorded in the office of the Register
of Deeds of Iredell County in Book 429 at Page 312.
' C
Beginning at a stake, the Northwest corner of Statesviile FCX property; thence North 62
deg. 04 min. West 132.0 ft. to a stake; thence North 3 deg. 41 min. East 4.06 ft to a stake in
the line of the Carnation Milk Company corner; thence with the line of the Carnation Milk
Company property, and the center of the Alexander Railroad in a northeasterly direction to a
point exactly opposite to the beginning point; thence South 22 deg. 51 min. West 25.34 ft. to
the beginning point
Book: 2040 Page: 161 Page 9 of 16
K-10
-------
The same containing a small tiact of land adjacent to the Northeast corner of the 1.22 acre
tract this date conveyed by the Grantor to the Grantee, all as shown by a map of said
property as surveyed by Kcstler & MacKay, Registered Surveyors, on May 15,1968.
All of the lands owned by the Grantor lying South of the 1.22 acres, more or Jess, tract of
land this date conveyed by the Grantor to the Grantee. The lands conveyed by this
conveyance being whatever lands the Grantor has in the right of way of N.C. Highway No.
90.
D
Beginning at an iron stake in the Southwest comer of the Statesville PCX property, said iron
stake being a distance of 6.4 ft. from the northern curb of N.C. Highway No. 90; thence in
the right of way of said highway No. 90 North 61 deg. 10 ruin. West 215.88 ft to an iron
stake, a corner with the Carnation Milk Company, said iron stake being a distance of 11.25
ft. from the northern curb of Highway No. 00; thence with the line of Carnation Milk
Company property North 17 deg. 19 min. East 219.19 ft. to a fence post set in concrete, said
fence post being a distance of 49.75 ft. from the center of the Alexander Railroad; thence
South 77 deg. 07 min. East 104.62 ft to a stake ; thence South 3 deg. 41 min. West 4.06 ft. to
a stake; thence South 62 deg. 04 min. East 132 ft to an existing iron in the Statesville FCX
property line, or comer, said iron stake being a distance of 25.34 ft from the center of
Alexander Railroad; thence with the existing line of Statesville FCX property Sooth 22 deg.
51 min. West 243.25 ft to the beginning.
The same containing art area of 1.22 acres, more of less, as sun-eyed by Kestler & MacKay,
Registered Surveyors, on May 15, 1968.
Book: 2040 Page:
161
Page 10 of 16
K-11
-------
""3.-03-2009
~?m
10=23
TOPI MOtlLLW gOTTEH
7048127629 P-os
Df3
¦f 37;
A
tics of tl* Jwat fffi, in wmtmioo of ti»» nn of Pes
Tdl.B^bjS ^*rwry gounty, Alotarto, tod R. II. Deal aria »ifo, Wlnrtac*
U. Decl, of IfccUwibtrc Coanty, »»rth Caroline, rnd Albeit 11, Coopsr ami >.ife
ftcbtdtah Cooper, and H, H. Niabolwn nnd wife, ISismo U. Hicholcon, of Xre&cll
County, Hoi Ui Carolua, ani Southern Scsuritie-;, Xco., a coTporttjoa duly
choTtort*, orponjrefl end aeme luixwcs unist Uw Xa Cpt-
olirwi, cith -its jnrraipol. plncn of ta»9ij»io lit Jloorssnll*, Rtrtlt Cwolino, pntXi
at tuc iirat part, to famors Co-Dpemti-w 3xch«mse, n corporation duly
chcrtorcd, organmed cad toing '¦usinsj uader tho tewa of the atatc of Berth
Carolina, its pHjiu pal plac« ortKUiasm in itetaan, Martto Carol in*, party
' or the stwm/jwrt/i np»Efs
TM>t th«k »'
ttoJJars and ota'a^jrjli
second part, the ree«ft of"Wii<* it nercby eetaortetcsi, n* StT'.jinaS rna sol«,
end, ty t|»5« jMWMnts, *^tw&&)Ar-sell anfl eonwy to the jmrty of tie sexual pert ,
it® successors and B3s»tt»^«|f®e/€!|iMe,yt}w follariof tract ef l.wsd in SSntttf-
tx 11© Twiioiiip, Iredrtl 5ounty, TWih C&foliUi, \s-wit
, ^; v X'-
Y" ?cO«iui{, xo tha eect«r ef tho unor
hnrt surface HlCiwoy ami Phoenix Avrmi«,
Avanue X. J dec- 15 f=ui» S. oteut 350 feet Vo^ t^e ef we rein trscX of tfts
Soutr.trn R»l*aj Corjauy, sronawc fron StateEWlS® to. t.ixIorv»illc, tl.eneo F. 6l
4«8« 1? Bia, S» with «¦» scoter of Mid nKtn tjack^oWcfat
tha Qlsto tern- anfi Iredoli I>o*«aoi*a/it Conpeny, tft»ncc SOpttsi;
?5 fost to on XKMJ suit, tlienee S. 6l ieg» }i no. S. l-F f««t (tti. .i*-ircn
eorn«T cf the CrauforS Lsirt, Umnco S, 2J iec» I? run, ft, uncut ^72ijT«eV lo be ^
esater ef ti»» Taylorn'i lle-StsU»*illt narl sta-faee g^rjuny, tftoj»ee\a||i t^e er'nler
r' /
of sold r.i5hwa> ul a southeasterly flxroction about fftj f««t to x.»-» Ixcwuir, it
V'
toil® all OT Block k of the T. D» nillei proyerty, n pl*t ol tjiicfc j.s r*card«d in
Bap Soolc 2, p«©e 17,of tbo reeorta of Its Kcpistsr afSmtm for Srs4ell County,
ftarth Caxolin*, ui( ldAdc eune hc«®wor, to tl® nc"t» of lay of vss
_Soa«fBro Sojliay C<*panr, auft th® TqyKxrorille-StalraTiiaa taM swrfas® Eijjn-aj,
cod Biosaw mVesm, mA subject, fiirthar. to Uio ri(>t of •••ny ol n *atsr liaa along
tiiu Bortftem ea&» of the Toyior!rrj.lle-switcanll» Misteroy.
^ ----------
! U-25-38
Bu*eaae
I5.«
Stoop
So 114V» end to hoM, Ue »r»n»»aa tract of lint, vjtk all ptinltfts &nd
jlppwtanancea t5*r»u3to bsloosinc, to it, tlm mii port? cf the mcoai port, i ta
I %
wosoaoors aM naa^ns, u> tee bmjjIb ftiwer, ;
tfcylorsville-8v»te»T ill*
waiter of Ihoeni*
« corner of
1? mn. 1l» obout
Q
0
0
Book; 2040 Page: 161 Page 11 of 18
K-12
-------
PEB-03-2Q03 10J24
POPE MCMILLAN K0TTEH
7040727629 P.0?
1
I:
L
And the said parties cf Chi first, 'psrt, Tor tntosei »ts, their htin and rajre-
sart'ti :a, covera.it to sr.6 hitts.the s&id ?srty of the second part its successors
«rtS assigns, lhat they are saizid of scii l»n.ey ncntaoi.et), sni tJwt Mjey »»11 warrant on.a ftc «f», Tlorance tu Deal, Albort li. Cooper end wife, Retofcsh fc. (.'coper, «n4
J
HH. Nicholson -aid wife, 'Hossis iJ. ftKbolsan fc» «e hereunto set. tftea r IwnSs end
seals, and ta« Southern Securities Inc. ,""!*»* c;««d this mstrwse»t to be signed in
st» msti by its President, e'/.nHi by its secretary 3rd j.se canwos seal attached,
order of its Sourd or Directors duly giwrn in.»nting, this the i&y ana ysar
Sarniia W Turner
0. 1, Turtle r
F'.crancj U Oral
ft. M. Dial
Altert g. Cooper
/J ^ ^ gapttaa-B, Coeser
"/"^^Hanry H. NitHoi aon
¦ r~c u ) -
x Y } t3as6ife-
K ¦ flicho) son
JSE«4
Jsmtl
JSSml)
J SEAL)
J 52*1}
3ZA1.)
JSEM.)
{ 8y /*, Ov^Hiller
srcusiTiss, Isc.,
President..
'( (Ur'o '
' 3
Attest a. 3. Killer, Secretary ^
{eoapOrUTE sjal) , - •
srnz m to,hma,
courn a? KOKTOfficat,
I, Siggett, e Mot try Smile, oo B; re 5 /7c tzli t 0, P. turner «r.4 »ifs |
Ssriiiia V.. Turner, jsrsQr.oi.ly s^psatet! before ae thi j"'djiy ,inii sctacViJeflgei is? aue
execution of the foregoing insjiunent> »n4 ihnt vne saia Nsar;it..M Turner, mTe or
0, .< Turner, bea.nj by c» privatslf asca«Mr,#3, tep»rnt» and op«rt from her ««id hao
\J *
ban4, touching her uojuritary extcuiion of tba sain, ioth state ttist sbe s>(tr>«i the
saa-.e fisely aa4 voluntariiy, witaout the fear or campulsvon of Jier sei« UusbsnJ or ar
ottiei jtrsor-, t%i 6Jse fioth still voluntarily sjseat thereto ,
Witness ay ^.dnd eivd r.utsriil ssalf this the 5th day or Docemb^r, 1538. |
(N0Ta!« seal} * Asnei Ssfigett, Notary FuSlic \
hy cooffiissjon «ipir«i Wo*. 8, 19^ 2
NORTH CASOUfM,
irEOKiss suae cowni, . .
I, Tteams ?, GruheBi, fi Notary PoMic, do h»reby certify that H. I'. Beel, cr.d
wife, Clorenes M. Ce»l, psrsOnnJly sppeared t» 'c re s» this day enj s ilcnctledged the
6m •« saii Florer.ce M. Seal wife of
Js. ti. Deal, being bf Bo p.-ivntelr eie»m»4, aejjraie tea ap»rt fraa h«r xtii bus band,
{touching lir »olunt«rf 'essscutjon of the ssao, tfeth stste that sbe signed the u»i
'-i"
m^-7nanlT»'"i
Book; 2040 Page: 161 Page 12 of 16
K-13
-------
FE8-03-2009 10:24
POPE MCMILLAN KUTTEB
7048727529 P-0B
H
pAw, At. c
:*"*"*, ^
worn"H CAROLINA
tncoxu. cosirra
m 42S «a.3i2
DI19
ii
JOV*J
«£i
!ll
RS>'
s
§
*>
a
Tl>U E-ssd, sacdj? this 31#* day of Becerabar, IflfiS, &y Cooperative UUH,
Inc. , e corporation ergafiL&atf and »rty o3 tn#
the) receipt of t&ich 14 Uero&y sesmsKl* e»»tar of Jhoenlx A-Vonua i/. 2^
i*el i© as iroo ttsfce 1r
Railway Conpnny, jpvnr»lng irerefiUar*
61 iff - It cainutts ». vith tba\«n'
3?S ^/I0 r«t to afi trca staJse
track; th»rtce 5. II the b^jfirnino ccmtr, th* ¦flkrtt
of Slock ft of the ?. D. Miller pr«»p*pty,
in Hap floon 3, pa(» 1?, at th« v*<&sv$* ot tt»o
lTidtXl County, N, C. , «>td landa btinij ih«^
fjfhta of v*y si ths S&«£b«ra Cor.jj*T>y aatt tK»n T»y
Stateivtllo fiard"*ur|«kC9 htfhvcy, and S"hfcor>|* Av*^r, SLai%/S)»^Jf£ty'
iwrther to tht rffUl, €sf <#«? si a vatvr line aieeg the norOjirn fsgc
of th# Siatcavili«»-ttiyior!ivvU» high**y, this \ming, ts p*rt\)l fl«
*r*c\ of laeu convwye'S by fho M>ir» ©I T. D. KiHtr to the iVxAer*
Coo]5©r*ttv« £Kcb.%K|«, inc., bj Setd dated ffov#.nJj«r 23, 2538.
TO HAV2 A*o tO ffJto aiOTttold ir«cc or lot ©I land and all privilege
aad afi|6«ri®RSn\css t^rBiiiito \jelontinf, t© ?h# caltji party of tho tacond part, its
*r\6 In fee $Sspl© fortverj aod Thi void (mrty of *h« »nkatv th»t it i» s*U*d or sttitl prfcl*** tfi' f«t, ettrf hai the rlfhl tx> .*/.•"
convey ifi§ sect is /*o si»pj« and tbat tho s®sa ta free frcci all «ccuabrfttit«s,
aod that it will warrant snd tfe£and else said titl» to tKo cqj&b a^aisftt ths claims
'of ail' pttraooA «hamjio»vex , "¦>.
' - mHI
.-J
¦"A
^•11
Book; 2040 Page: 161 Page 13 of 16
K-14
-------
FEB-03-2009 10:24
POPE MOMILLftJ KUTTEH
7048727629 P«09
lift Kill CAROL! Hk
inrotu count/
& 45? R£45f
<
jjrfi^Sfc* I1B O t TtN 30LLAHS to Jit r in tv«a tid paid, th* r*« «l(3t 3 f
/ is hrteay acknovl»4gad, h«« r«*:U«d t%4 caifcismd and by
pxAmanis doeo ttoiM, k tlttii, *cd foitvcr
x title, tlaio, 8b4 inteeoit of th« a* id yatCj »S tbe ?iE*fc
I*y«p^d'To^X e • r i a i n rrae c or ptrtt.1 of l*ni lytflg an4 b ?1»|
In th«r4|l?j» lioxth Carolina » If$3f en che Xpeih
side af Uf^hvjiy j/5^ ?0,Q^fcd^ fettn
s®»ss». *»«»y ft
Cjs&ssvmmt
, Amwmrffb a* WW®?
* wweweswwis#! e
¦JwtTS*UH«A », C.
Il«»
rty»t. Trac
corner o(
dag* 04 oi«
I 4«g. 41 r%t
©I she Caroeclon .*<1
«"«*( the Nor t
ty; Chant* Korth 62
tak«; thine;® K'ccth
f4. te^s sfstka in the lint
: i I>- b o « p c o fA o E xi^e j,
lies si the Carnation silk c/^Jiypt^irty, ana «ba
ccntftT o£ tha 4l®«and®r^.Gi|f£siS
61r«etrlea to * point cuactly (op
p«l tic? thaaci. SOMth 12 rf»g
the befi^fcitsg point.
th* seas contciclcg a f»®4J tract » xtght af wcy s? H, C,
Highway Nc. 90
te ^«D 15 yot.0 th® aferessitf tract« ac ptvtcel* of i«a4
ae* «2l priviic|«o t&ercuBto btlctni&ns It tht e&ld pat ty af
tho sveood part sad 4*0 *uc«:«»Bors *&d <".«« ifBo im« Aft
R-'--
f.V
jls!
i
Book; 2040 Page: 161 Page 14 of 16
K-15
-------
PEB-03-20G9 l0'-24
POPE RCMILLM KtlTTEH
7048727629 P.iO
* • ^"T—v A IV* * a *" * * *
a.-rronjccve ,iv j.^rr
rl»«T «•« w«l ir *.»*¦ 0»>v0"*
a»*:,-*«>nrj.*..-'^,o»va c*»iai.iV^
NOHTH CAROLINA
cmron of jiEpeit
IMS t>«0, itade this 1'vk
a® '157 ft«454
«3#y cf
Hay
i? 66
by
sf
Htzl« 3, 5hcrr illv wi'ia'a oC Q« ^. Sh»tiU
ired^jl County m$* r h Cerclinu, party
of the first part, to ?cx* 1 r.c . , s "orch careltna corporation
of
U*e wcgM pert-
Stats cf Serrh Carolina, party
(ilHUSCtH
J % That »81 bircaln*cf tod sold, end by theie presents dc*s grant, bargHn,
r / ~
seil^ and convey t© said pnr ty a? tVr» « city of
lylngNoa ehg ,^orth side oC K. S.
evpar«isul«r1f d e#cr i&ad as follows?
k
Be* t tt*itit a t s« t*«* 3?tb«/l"a the Stutfevcpt cornifE ef eha
Sta tes* ill* FCX property j sn--d ipoa ssUhi being u Y< h^lji „3b& « I® ®l0f '*«#r
31 5 ,S8 ft. to if pr, it*U, a c ot 6«r «i tb " tHs Car^atlcs Hilk
Company, ta id iron stall* h.*tn*"a. u'ccti 1J.25 Ft, frees sbe
nor rK«m curb of highway Ko. fOi VfSncB line of Carftotion
Sill toM^tay ty Kcr th \ T d o g 19 ®i cV ¦£<« tv 21» , 19 tc, te a
t »ne e pose e«t io cO«cr«te4 i* id leo^e^ po;st bfflps & di1tJtac«
sf *9, ?5 f C . frees tN c«5ir of tK« Al
Sou;h 5 7 dag. Of cio. E«se 104,62 £t. to 'c »takej- race South J
deg. 4i ain. t 6.C& sc. ro a «tok«; thor^a 5?>utft 62 J*«. 04
ate, K4»t U2 f C. ta • n 9ii« ting ices in Ch ¦ S t* tc#v Jii«, TC*
proper ty Use, cr said t ten c tsthc o*lng « ai«tflnca of
X 5.3 A (i. ua i%nt»s ut li'.mriScr Hast read; t>eac# t>>*
sslsttftg 1 lr»e e*t St»tt#»tUe FCK j>tqPCT ty Seat^ 22 SI aini ^
Vf!i t J&3.2& it, to c U • P«Glnnlo£.
Tb n sa^s c?tu* t M io(i 6 q ar«0 aE 1.22 a< T , a°r* C *•«** a 1
luivtffi) by *«scier & KacRoy, Rcaiotercd Sorvc.yote, oc Hay 15,
l?68.
The 3&es® being tho land* cooveycd to C. A, 5h*rcili cod vi'tb,
Ha,rie S, Sherrill, Sy rsc®r4ed io 3e*i 100, ?ae« 723»
aa<3 Daed look. 13S, foge 594, Ir-siel 1 County B&g,isfcty.
Book: 2040 Page: 161 Page 15 of 16
K-16
-------
V
--4
X
><
\u
mws
• Ml DSTWCES *«t MORWdH. C*OC«0 WEARIED >* tC* VHJZ1 on^RwISf: SPFCffirB
? MO USCS Off ROSS siOWwEWTS fOU^D WW 2000' 0r S'T.
3 TV»5 SUfWCf W*.% PtmmidW n«thsxn tHt etHt'TT 0*" A eOxIPiXT nric St«CM,
the aero nconx $H&m mm: u*tv rao« coumty t*s records.
* th?5 wesson* is stmyrcr to *u. usttftwrs, wwcmeiits, *wd RO^-or-wM-s, or «___
5, MO ODWWMWN fWS OCD* MM3£ St fM£ SWtJB AS 10 THE nBSTDICC «T S"trbMoc*wou*o stdswce r&aynes.
m cDfljesscs.
6. SMUS.-CS, WNQ, «mTO3, rtxCES, ? SIC ISfTS€l*ei©#r$ H0T $*©«%,' *S f^AFS or n® pensft.
CONTAjjINa:ED SfTE WQIESi
icm mss m-s i«[ sswsarst-mt»¦ . . .
wiwm re eussB'? s® nnjst um>-uk wimeno** s saa ixm
os«t«t6,» rernwemm, >*r eara ts swe» «twe» en **mm&
SW8l«WtM» w PMK BCKsSPTOaSSCFe*. »» ®C»*•* *»« »*-
wk® *> nc «se» w t>r erra t»s«ro««w « r«m*- »*r
fwim et * £c«*s*b.*is en «o * seraw w cms sow i» *«r
*¦— ¦—- — -sar amsar rr ciwteWMire ipi
Site
MM. *».
LKFM
PStSFCKTr G*mO? *>W»ro«W:W
t*< o^r* «r »«m «jvn«T7u s sow *6soo»rt;
su* *ssaa«n, 0,5 *ss «tjb*ip w aowrw £*eoiSN»
mmubo »eoaes* <-os sun *isec*»T3. uc
f
—RgTjrgaSg
*t cmownr. f' ¦}; t>*a«ifO»v (J •>
A»6 CABWM fTT^>UJB3iS (S.I). <» wtw, imis <#xs #«t or*rcTo
ss ses cm «i«m: it»*s. sesewwe iro. nc «ees «t tfTSAooxrtuCME,
CHUN@ros*i. Tcm>e»«,QMis »a© rmi ifwu !.» tfi n«s cuwaw $m
nnusc «f «« swe«cr »«ca a *a«eeo « m «k®i «sa«?«
0» OtlTO orrjer *t OS3* A? 5»®bs.
w we o*tus>, r< 'aao*c use mv i© -m. «jsmsxi pm&t
CRAPH»C SCALE - FEET
W7.SC,00
MIJWW
c»s
NOTICE OF CONFAWINATEO SlTEj
SW .4550^^5,
1820 V^ST «^0HT StSECT. STATESVU£, K.C \
rc, onsit^jr,;^, ctNtro /?jo " T~
P1.0CE. 'fs ¦]
OeBd »«.>• 2C2» ® «ci}«» ?2S«-?2^r
wytw-ct. wtDfwL OD^ar' •» «X*. INC
CTSt^Ct C0sl»' OMSOM - UC MlJVBn 0? CVD S5S
HErtW^Ct. DlCD 00r C«v*'noU ¦we*^t7
>» t" Wets rtr* SU -' ' "
cam* fr«r a
Coo*.rw «
Stone Lond Survoying Compony w
A
», ki i-n«i
. OK) W-O'3
7^?'
THIS MAP IS NOT A CERTIFIED SURVEY AND HAS NOT
BEEN REVIEWED BY A LOCAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY
FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ANY APPLICABLE LAND
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
8
CQ
-------
GERALD V. GRANT & ASSOCIATES
2351 SIMONTON ROAD
STATESVIlLE, NC 28625
PHONE: (704) 872-3136
-------
El Paso Natural Gas
Company, LLC.
a Kinder Morgan company
January 29, 2020
Ms. Elizabeth Hartzell
Division of Waste Management - Superfund Section
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
1646 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1646
RE: FCX (Statesville) Superfund Site (OU3)
Required Annual Notification, Declaration of Perpetual Land Use Restrictions Recorded in Iredell County
Register of Deeds, Book 2472, Pages 1173-1188
As required in Perpetual Land Use Restriction number 8 of the above referenced Declaration of Perpetual Land Use
Restrictions, El Paso Natural Gas Company, LLC is providing notice that the referenced Declaration is still recorded in
the Office of the Iredell County Register of Deeds and that activities and conditions at the property remain in compliance
with the land use restrictions described in said document.
If you have any questions regarding this notification, please contact me at (713) 420-3475.
Ms. Hartzell;
Sincerely,
#
Joseph Wiley
Kinder Morgan, Inc.
CC: Ken Mallary - EPA Region 4
STATE OF TEXAS
§
COUNTY OF HARRIS §
Before me personally appeared v jc;wn PiiMi
Who executed said instrument for the purposes therein expressed.
Joseph WlIf ii
therein
nitim Nictkfeik'
Notary Public (print name)
Notary Public Signature
My commission expires QtfJ }*{j % £ £ 0
SREAMMA NICOLE POLK
awv Public, Stat® of Tmm
:omm. Expire* 09-14-2020
Notary ID 128123173
Stamp
Attachment
1001 Louisiana Street, Room 757A Houston, TX 77002
K-19
-------
Type: CONSOLIDATED REAL PROPERTY
Recorded: 2/2/2017 10:31:37 AM
Fee Amt: $30.00 Page 1 of 16
Iredell County, NC
Ronald N. Wyatt Register of Deeds
BK 2472 PG 1173-1188
DECLARATION OF PERPETUAL LAND USE RESTRICTIONS
For Property Owned By: El Paso Natural Gas Company, LLC
Parcel Identification Numbers:
4734-27-3387
FCX STATESVILLE SUPERFUND SITE (OPERABLE UNIT 3)
IREDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
The real property that is the subject of this Declaration of Perpetual Land Use
Restrictions ("Declaration") is contaminated with "hazardous substances", as that term is
defined by the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act,
as amended ("CERCLA"), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq. It also is an INACTIVE HAZARDOUS
SUBSTANCE OR WASTE DISPOSAL SITE as defined by North Carolina's Inactive
Hazardous Sites Response Act of 1987, which consists of Section 130A-310 through Section
130A-310.19 of the North Carolina General Statutes ("N.C.G.S."). The hazardous
substances originate on Operable Unit 3 (OU 3) of the FCX Statesville Superfund Site
(hereinafter referred to as the "Site"). The real property that is the subject of this
Declaration (referred to hereafter as the "Property") comprises a portion of the Site. It also
is subject to an existing Declaration of Perpetual Land Use Restriction as an Inactive
Hazardous Substance or Waste Disposal Site that is recorded at Deed Book 1388, Pages
2436-2443, in the Office of the Register of Deeds for Iredell County (referred to herein as
"First Declaration.") This Declaration supplements the First Declaration with respect to
the real property legally described in this Declaration. The hazardous substances originate on
the former Burlington Industries plant site (Parcel Identification Number 4734-17-8234 also
referred to as the "Source Area"). The Property is adjacent to the Source Area and a plume of
contaminated groundwater from the Source Area flows under the Property.
The Site is the subject of a Record of Decision ("ROD") issued by the United States
Environmental Protection Agency ("USEPA") in September 1996; an Explanation of Significant
Difference issued in September 2006 and a Consent Decree that was filed in civil action no.
5:97CV198-V in the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina,
entitled "United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Beaunit Corporation; Burlington Industries, Inc./
and El Paso Natural Gas Company, d/h/a El Paso Energy Corporation, Defendants. " The land
use restrictions set forth in this Declaration are included in the remedial action plan for the Site
Page 1 of 6
K-20
R.O.T.C
-------
and are identified in the ROD and amendments thereto approved by the Secretary of the North
Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (or its successor in function), or his/her delegate,
as authorized by N.C.G.S. Section 143B-279.9. The North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality shall hereinafter be referred to as "DEQ."
El Paso Natural Gas Company, LLC ("EPNG"), located in Colorado Springs, Colorado,
is the owner in fee simple of the Property. The Property is located at 214 Phoenix Street in the
County of Iredell, City of Statesville, State of North Carolina, and is the real property shown in
the records of the Office of the Register of Deeds for Iredell County at the Deed Book and Page
number listed in the Table below and legally described in Exhibit A to this Declaration.
Current
Former
Exhibit Parcel ID No. Parcel ID No.
Deed Book/
Page
and
Tract No.
4734-27-3387 4734-27-3387 2379/1715
Notice of Inactive
Hazardous Substance or
Waste Disposal Site
(Plat Parcel)
Parcel 1
The Property is also shown in Parcel 1 on a Notice of Inactive Hazardous Substance or Waste
Disposal Site constituting a survey plat that is concurrently being recorded with this Declaration
at Map Book L?(c> Page 3 / in the Office of the Register of Deeds for Iredell County.
For the purpose of protecting public health and the environment, EPNG hereby declares
that the Property shall be held, sold and conveyed subject to the following perpetual land use
restrictions, which shall run with the land; shall be binding on all parties having any right, title or
interest in the Property or any part thereof, their heirs, successors and assigns; and shall, as
provided in N.C.G.S. Section 130A-310.3(f), be enforceable without regard to lack of privity of
estate or contract, lack of benefit to particular land, or lack of any property interest in particular
land. These restrictions shall continue in perpetuity and cannot be amended or canceled unless
and until the Iredell County Register of Deeds receives and records the written concurrence of
the Secretary of DEQ (or its successor in function), or his/her delegate. If any provision of this
Declaration is found to be unenforceable in any respect, the validity, legality, and enforceability
of the remaining provisions shall not in any way be affected or impaired.
PERPETUAL LAND USE RESTRICTIONS
1) Groundwater shall not be used for any purpose. The installation of groundwater wells or
other devices for access to groundwater for any purpose other than activities pursuant to
the remedy are prohibited without prior approval by North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources ("DEQ"), or its successor in function.
2) No part of the Property shall be used for mining, extraction of coal, oil, gas or any other
minerals or non-mineral substances.
3) Engineering controls installed as part of the Site remedy, including groundwater
monitoring wells located on the Property and engineered remedial appurtenances
installed in accordance with a Remedial Action Plan, shall not be altered or disturbed in
any way without prior approval in writing from DEQ. No surface water impoundment or
retention pond shall be installed or constructed without the prior approval of DEQ
4) No building shall be constructed on the Property unless a vapor intrusion mitigation
Page 2 of 6
K-21
-------
system is installed, or in the alternative, a vapor intrusion assessment is performed in
accordance with guidelines issued by the USEPA or North Carolina, and a vapor
mitigation system is installed if required by the vapor intrusion assessment.
5) No building with a below grade structure used for human habitation, shall be constructed
on the Property.
6) No person conducting environmental assessment or remediation at the Property, or
involved in determining compliance with applicable land use restrictions, at the direction
of, or pursuant to a permit or order issued by, DEQ or its successor in function, may be
denied access to the Property the purpose of conducting such activities. Each deed, title
or other instrument conveying an interest in the Property shall contain a notice that the
Property is subject to the access requirements in this paragraph.
7) Each person who owns any portion of the Property shall cause the instrument of any sale,
lease, grant, or other transfer of any interest in the Property to include a provision
expressly requiring the lessee, grantee, or transferee to comply with this Declaration. The
failure to include such provision shall not affect the validity or applicability of any land
use restriction in this Declaration.
8) A person who owns the Property or part thereof shall submit a letter report, containing
the notarized signature of the owner, in January of each year on or before January 31st, to
the Superfund Section of the Division of Waste Management of DEQ, or its successor in
function, confirming that this Declaration is still recorded in the Office of the Iredell
County Register of Deeds and that activities and conditions at the Property remain in
compliance with the land use restrictions herein.
9) Each deed, title or other instrument conveying an interest in the Property shall contain a
notice that the Property is subject to the Consent Decree that was filed in civil action no.
5:97CV198-V in the United States District Court for the Western District of North
Carolina, entitled ''United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Beaunit Corporation;
Burlington Industries, Inc.; and El Paso Natural Gas Company, d/b/a El Paso Energy
Corporation, Defendants ", and any lien retained by the United States of America.
10) Each person who owns any portion of the Property shall, at least 30 days prior to
conveyance of an interest in the Property, give written notice of the Consent Decree to
the prospective grantee, and shall notify USEPA in writing of the proposed conveyance,
the name and address of the grantee, and the date on which notice was given to the
grantee.
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES REMAIN ON THE PROPERTY, BUT ARE NOT A DANGER
TO PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT, PROVIDED THAT THE ABOVE
RESTRICTIONS, AND ANY OTHER MEASURES REQUIRED BY DEQ, ARE STRICTLY
COMPLIED WITH.
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
The owner of the Property hereby represents and warrants to the other signatories hereto:
That the owner of the Property is the sole owner of the Property;
That the owner of the Property holds fee simple title to the Property free, clear and
Page 3 of 6
K-22
-------
unencumbered;
That the owner of the Property has the power and authority to enter into this Declaration,
to grant the rights and interests herein provided and to carry out all obligations hereunder;
That the owner of the Property has provided to DEQ the names of all other persons that
own an interest in or hold an encumbrance on the Property and has notified such persons
of the owner's intention to enter into this Declaration; and
That this Declaration will not materially violate or contravene or constitute a material
default under any other agreement, document or instrument to which the owner of the
Property is a party or by which the owner of the Property may be bound or affected.
ENFORCEMENT
The above land use restrictions are an integral part of the remedy for the contamination at
the Property. Adherence to the restrictions is necessary to protect public health and the
environment. These land use restrictions shall be enforced by any owner, operator, or other party
responsible for any part of the Property. The above land use restrictions may also be enforced by
DEQ through the remedies provided in N.C.G.S. Chapter 130A, Article 1, Part 2 or by means of
a civil action, and may also be enforced by any unit of local government having jurisdiction over
any part of the Property. Any attempt to cancel this Declaration without the approval of DEQ or
its successor in function shall constitute noncompliance with the Remedial Action Plan approved
by DEQ for the Property, and shall be subject to enforcement by DEQ to the full extent of the
law. Failure by any party required or authorized to enforce any of the above restrictions shall in
no event be deemed a waiver of the right to do so thereafter as to the same violation or as to one
occurring prior or subsequent thereto.
FUTURE SALES, LEASES, CONVEYANCES AND TRANSFERS
When any portion of the Property is sold, leased, conveyed or transferred, pursuant to
N.C.G.S. Section 130A-310.8(e) the deed or other instrument of transfer shall contain in the
description section, in no smaller type than that used in the body of the deed or instrument, a
statement that the real property being sold, leased, conveyed, or transferred has been used as a
hazardous substance or waste disposal Property and a reference by book and page to the
recordation of the Notice of Inactive Hazardous Substance or Waste Disposal Property
referenced in this Declaration.
[Intentionally left blank/Signatures next page]
Page 4 of 6
K-23
-------
OWNER SIGNATURE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I, Floyd C. Robertson, exercising power of attorney for El
Natural Gas Company, LLC execute these presents on this /^^day of
20_J_.
1 Paso
Signature:
Signatory's name:
Signatory's title:
"LOYEmS/ROBERTSON
Attorney-in-F act
t O yn
mrsf
aw
STATE OF COLORADO
COUNTY OF EL PASO
, a Notary Public, do hereby certify that
Floyd C. Robertson personally Apeared before me this day, declared that he is acting on behalf
of El Paso Natural Gas Company. LLC, and that by authority duly given and proven by the
power of attorney attached hereto, and as the act of El Paso Natural Gas Company, LLC, he has
signed this Declaration.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this $jday of^CffTAML, 20)\£) ..
My Commission expires: \Q- Q -
[SEAL]
DENISE M TONEY
NOTARY PUBLIC
STATE OF COLORADO
NOTARY ID # 20034035390
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES OCTOBER 17, 2019
Page 5 of 6
K-24
-------
APPROVAL AND CERTIFICATION OF THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT
OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
The foregoing Declaration of Perpetual Land Use Restrictions is hereby approved and
certified.
By:
JinfBateson, fcu., Chief
Hiperfund Section
Division of Waste Management
North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF _ Vm a iu j
I, ¥\(W\f\\W\A I f! 1/1 . a Notary Public, do hereby certify that
It vV\ personally appeared before me this day,
produced proper identification in the form of 1 an(* signed this
Declaration.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this ^ day 20jl„
A
. / ' Notary Public / J
My Commission expires: y. jfl i/\ \JCi VIA 7, (j);
NOTARY PUBLIC
WAKE COUNTY, N.C.
" REGISTER OF DEEDS CERTIFICATION
The foregoing Declaration of Perpetual Land Use Restrictions is certified to be duly recorded at
the date and time, and the Book and Page, shown on the first page hereof.
Register of Deeds for Iredell County
By:
Page 6 of 6
K-25
Name and Title
-------
EXHIBIT "A"
Beginning at an iron in set at the intersection of the eastern right of way line of Phoenix Street and the
northern right of way line of Piedmont Street, the Southwest corner of Lot 12, as recorded in Plat Book 2
at Page 17 in the Iredell County Registry, said PK nail being located N 01-40-10 E 523.05 feet from the
intersection of the eastern right of way line of Phoenix Street and the centerline of the Norfolk Southern
Railroad, thence running with the eastern right of way line of Phoenix Street N 01-40-10 E 408.00 feet to
a PK nail set at the intersection of the eastern right of way line of Phoenix Street and the southern right
of way line of Yadkin Street, the Northwest corner of Lot 19, as recorded in Plat Book 2 at Page 17 in the
Iredell County Registry, said PK nail being located N 60-01-52 E 58.73 feet from an iron pin set on the
western right of way line of Phoenix Street; thence running with the southern right of way line of Yadkin
Street S 77-45-50 E 543.00 feet to an iron pin set at the intersection of the southern right of way line of
Yadkin Street and the western right of way line North Miller Street, the Northeast corner of Lot 6, as
recorded in Plat Book 2 at Page 17 in the Iredell County Registry; thence running with the western right
of way line of North Miller Street S 01-09-10 W 300.00 feet to an unmarked point at the intersection of
the western right of way line of North Miller Street and the northern right of way line of Piedmont
Street, the Southeast corner of Lot 1, as recorded in Plat Book 2 at Page 17 in the Iredell County
Registry, said unmarked point being located S 01-09-10 W 52.65 feet from an iron pin set on the western
right of way line of North Miller Street, said iron pin being the common corner of lots 1 and 2; thence
running with the northern right of way line of Piedmont Street N 89-13-53 W 536.56 feet to the point
and place of Beginning containing 4.347 acres and being lots, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
15, 16, 17,18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 and 24 in Block D of the T.D. Miller Property recorded in Plat Book 2 at
Page 17 in the Iredell County Registry and being Tract 1 as described in Deed Book 664 at Page 62 in the
Iredell County Registry.
K-26
-------
~//// /¦ A
EASTERN AND WESTERN PIPELINES GROUP
SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY
STATE OF TEXAS §
§ KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS;
COUNTY OF HARRIS §
Effective as of January 1, 2013, Joseph Listengart, as Vice President of each of the entities listed on
Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (each, a "Company" and collectively,
the "Companies"), does hereby designate, constitute and appoint each of the employees of Kinder
Morgan, Inc. and its affiliates listed on Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference
(each, an "Authorized Employee") to execute and deliver from time to time in the name of and for and
on behalf of any Company as its Attorney-in-Fact without corporate seal and without attestation:
1. Rights of way, easements, franchises, licenses, permits, privileges, agreements or similar
rights, for right of way purposes, over and through any lands owned, occupied or
administered by city, county, state, federal or tribal agencies or authorities or by individuals,
partnerships, institutions, organizations, companies, corporations, trusts, estates or other
entities (including the obtaining or modification of zoning, land use or similar ordinances
affecting any such lands); provided that the present value of the minimum payments to be
made by the Company pursuant to such right of way, agreement or other right does not
exceed $200,000;
2. Leases, subleases, licenses and other rights of access to, use or occupancy of, or ingress or
egress upon, lands owned, occupied or administered by city, county, state, federal or tribal
agencies or authorities or by individuals, partnerships, institutions, organizations,
companies, corporations, trusts, estates or other entities (including the obtaining or
modification of zoning, land use or similar ordinances affecting any such lands); provided
that the present value of the minimum payments to be made by the Company pursuant to
such lease or other right does not exceed $200,000;
3. Amendments and modifications of any of the foregoing; provided that (i) such amendment
or modification is entered into without relinquishment of any Company's rights thereunder
and (ii) the present value of the minimum payments to be made by the Company pursuant
to such right of way, lease, agreement or other right being amended or modified does not,
after giving effect to such amendment or modification, exceed $200,000;
4. Settlements of landowner property damage claims arising out of construction, operation,
maintenance or retirement of the Company's facilities; provided that the present value of
the payments to be made by the Company pursuant to such settlement does not exceed
$100,000; and provided, further, that the limited settlement authority granted hereby does
not include the authority to settle any matter that is in litigation, regardless of the amount
of the claim.
K-27
-------
5. Any and all applications (including stipulations, affidavits, certificates and other pertinent
documents) for, acceptances and acknowledgements of, agreements, documents and
instruments evidencing any of the foregoing.
Not by way of limitation, but by way of confirmation, the powers and authority hereby
conferred shall extend to and include any and all of the instruments for a Company and/or acts above
described which may cover or pertain to lands of the United States of America, or to be acquired by the
United States of America, lands of any State or Tribal or Allotted Indian Lands.
Nothing herein contained shall be construed to revoke or amend, or otherwise to limit or affect
the powers and authority granted under any other power of attorney executed by or on behalf of a
Company, except that each and every power of attorney granted prior to the execution of this power of
attorney to any Authorized Employee concerning the subject matter listed herein is hereby revoked
effective as of the date first set forth above.
Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, if any Authorized Employee in any way
exceeds his or her authority and power specified in this Special Power of Attorney, then the Company
shall not be bound by the representations of such Attorney-in-Fact, nor does the Company waive any
defenses which may be available to it to contest, negate or disaffirm the actions of such Attorney-in-
Fact.
The Companies hereby ratify and confirm any and all lawful actions taken by the Attorneys since
January 1, 2013 by virtue of this Special Power of Attorney, to the extent within the scope of authority
granted hereby.
The authority granted to an Authorized Employee hereby shall continue in full force and effect
until the earliest to occur of: (i) December 31, 2014, (ii) the time at which such Authorized Employee's
employment with Kinder Morgan, Inc. and its affiliates is terminated, and (iii) such time as the relevant
Company ceases to be an affiliate of, or a company managed or operated by an affiliate of, Kinder
K-28
-------
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF HARRIS
This instrument was signed before me on March
of each Company identified in this instrument.
^!toi3.
by Joseph Listengart, Vice President
Given under my hand and seal of office this day and year aforesaid.
/ffifev ©loria MtotitefS
N«*»or M**
State offtau#
Comm. E*p. 12*0G*I3
- ¦»
MAAMl
My Commission Expires:
otary Public in and for the State of Tex
K-29
-------
EXHIBIT A
WESTERN PIPELINE GROUP COMPANIES
1. Bear Creek Storage Company, L.L.C.
a Lousiana limited liability company
2. Calnev Pipe Line LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
3. Camino Real Gathering Company, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability company
4. Central Florida Pipeline LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
5. Cheyenne Plains Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability company
6. CIG Gas Storage Company
a Delaware limited liability company
7. Colorado Interstate Gas Company, LLC.
a Delaware limited liability company
8. Cypress Interstate Pipeline LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
9. Eagle Ford Crossover LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
10. El Paso Midstream Investment Company, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability company
11. El Paso Midstream Group LLC
a Delaware limited liability
12. El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability company
13. Elba Express Company, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability company
14. Elba Liquefaction Company, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability company
K-30
-------
15. Gulf LNG Energy, LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
16. Gulf LNG Pipeline, LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
17. Horizon Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability company
18. Kinder Morgan Border Pipeline LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
19. Kinder Morgan Cochin LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
20. Kinder Morgan Crossover LLC
a Delaware liability company
BY: Kinder Morgan Operating L.P. "A"
a Delaware limited partnership and its managing member
21. Kinder Morgan Crude & Condensate LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
22. Kinder Morgan Eagle Ford LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
23. Kinder Morgan Freedom Pipeline LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
24. Kinder Morgan Illinois Pipeline LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
25. Kinder Morgan Liquids Terminals LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
26. Kinder Morgan Louisiana Pipeline LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
27. Kinder Morgan North Texas Pipeline LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
28. Kinder Morgan NatGas Operator LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
K-31
-------
29. Kinder Morgan Petcoke, LP.
a Delaware limited partnership
BY: Kinder Morgan Petcoke GP LLC,
its general partner
a Delaware limited liability company
30. Kinder Morgan Pecos Valley LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
31. Kinder Morgan Southeast Terminals LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
32. Kinder Morgan Tank Storage Terminals LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
33. Kinder Morgan Tejas Pipeline LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
34. Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
35. Kinder Morgan Utica LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
36. KinderHawk Field Services LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
37. Mldcontinent Express Pipeline LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
38. Mojave Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability Company
39. Mojave Pipeline Operating Company, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability Company
40. Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
41. Parkway Pipeline LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
42. Plantation Pipe Line Company
a Delaware limited liability company
43. Ruby Pipeline, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability company
K-32
-------
44. Southern LNG Company, LLC.
a Delaware limited liability company
45. Sierrita Gas Pipeline LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
46. Southern Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability company
47. SFPP, LP.
a Delaware limited partnership
By Kinder Morgan Operating L.P. "D"
Its General Partner
By Kinder Morgan G.P., Inc.
Its General Partner
By Kinder Morgan Management, LLC
The Delegate of the General Partner
48. Tejas Gas, LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
49. Tejas Natural Gas, LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
50. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability company
51. TransColorado Gas Transmission Company LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
52. WYCO Development LLC
a Colorado limited liability company
BY: Colorado Interstate Gas Company, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability and its member
53. Wyoming Interstate Company, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability company
K-33
-------
54. Young Gas Storage, Ltd.
a Colorado limited partnership
BY: CI6 Gas Storage Company
a Delaware corporation and its sole General Partner
K-34
-------
EXHIBIT B
AUTHORIZED EMPLOYEES
Daniel 6. Gredvig
Floyd C. Robertson
K-35
-------
El Paso- Natural <3as
Company, LLC.
7 , , " m ;
January 29, 2020
Ms. Elizabeth Hartzell
Division of Waste Management - Superfund Section
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
1646 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1646
RE: FCX (Statesville) Superfund Site (OU3)
Required Annual Notification, Declaration of Perpetual Land Use Restrictions Recorded in Iredell County
Register of Deeds, Book 2472, Pages 1189-1232
As required in Perpetual Land Use Restriction number 9 of the above referenced Declaration of Perpetual Land Use
Restrictions, El Paso Natural Gas Company, LLC is providing notice that the referenced Declaration is still recorded in
the Office of the Iredell County Register of Deeds and that activities and conditions at the property remain in compliance
with the land use restrictions described in said document.
If you have any questions regarding this notification, please contact me at (713) 420-3475.
Ms, Hartzell;
Sincerely,
Joseph Wiley
Kinder Morgan, Inc.
CC: Ken Mallary - EPA Region 4
STATE OF TEXAS
§
COUNTY OF HARRIS §
Before me personally appeared _ jPuii >\ i mitii
Who executed said instrument for the purposes therein expressed.
Witness my hand and official seal, this _
"Tftsgph H1 lei.
therein
Notary Public (print name)
Notary Public Signature
Stamp
Attachment
1001 Louisiana Street, Room 757A Houston, TX 77002
K-36
-------
Type: CONSOLIDATED REAL PROPERTY
Recorded: 2/2/2017 10:31:37 AM
Fee Amt: $142.00 Page 1 of 44
Iredell County, NC
Ronald N. Wyatt Register of Deeds
BK 2472 PG 1189-1232
DECLARATION OF PERPETUAL LAND USE RESTRICTIONS
For Property Owned By: El Paso Natural Gas Company
(now El Paso Natural Gas Company, LLC)
Parcel Identification Numbers:
4734-17-7773 4734-17-8773 4734-18-6147 4734-18-8264 4734-27-0701
4734-17-7868 4734-17-8849 4734-18-7068 4734-18-9048 4734-27-0802
4734-17-8234 4734-17-9931 4734-18-7276 4734-18-9244
4734-17-8631 4734-18-8058
FCX STATESVILLE SUPERFUND SITE (OPERABLE UNIT 3)
IREDELL COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
The real properties that are the subject of this Declaration of Perpetual Land Use
Restrictions ("Declaration") are contaminated with "hazardous substances" as that term is
defined by the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act,
as amended ("CERCLA/SARA"), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq. It also is an INACTIVE
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE OR WASTE DISPOSAL SITE as defined by North Carolina's
Inactive Hazardous Sites Response Act of 1987, which consists of Section 130A-310 through
Section 130A-310.19 of the North Carolina General Statutes ("N.C.G.S."). The hazardous
substances originate from Operable Unit 3 (OU 3) of the FCX Statesville Superfund Site
(hereinafter referred to as the "Site"). Certain parcels (PIN numbers 4734-17-8234 and
4734-18-6147) are also subject to an existing Declaration of Perpetual Land Use Restriction
as an Inactive Hazardous Substance or Waste Disposal Site that is recorded at Deed Book
1388, Pages 2436-2443, in the Office of the Register of Deeds for Iredell County (referred to
herein as "First Declaration.") This Declaration supplements the First Declaration with
respect to the real property legally described in this Declaration. The real property that is
the subject of this Declaration is referred to hereafter as the "Property" or the "Properties,
" The "Property" or "Properties" comprise a portion of the FCX Statesville Superfund Site
referenced above.
The Site is the subject of a Record of Decision ("ROD") issued by the United States
Environmental Protection Agency ("USEPA") in September 1996; an Explanation of Significant
Difference issued in September 2006 and a Consent Decree that was filed in civil action no.
Ul
R.O.T.r, Page Countr-
NS PQ Si1
Page 1
K-37
-------
5:97CV198-V in the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina,
entitled u United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Beaunit Corporation; Burlington Industries, Inc.;
and El Paso Natural Gas Company, d/'b/a El Paso Energy Corporation, Defendants. " The land
use restrictions set forth in this Declaration are included in the remedial action plan for the Site
and are identified in the ROD and amendments thereto approved by the Secretary of the North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (or its successor in function), or
his/her delegate, as authorized by N.C.G.S. Section 143B-279.9. The North Carolina Department
of Environment and Natural Resources, now the Department of Environmental Quality, shall
hereinafter be referred to as "DEQ."
El Paso Natural Gas Company, now El Paso Natural Gas Company LLC, ("EPNG"),
located in Colorado Springs, Colorado, is the owner in fee simple of the Properties.. The Properties
are located at 201 Phoenix Street (former Burlington Plant) and various addresses on Melviney,
Reid, Yadkin, and Phoenix Streets in the County of Iredell, City of Statesville, State of North
Carolina, and is the real property shown in the records of the Office of the Register of Deeds for
Iredell County at the Deed Book and Page number listed in the Table below and legally described
at the referenced Book and Page No. (copy attached at Exhibits A-L to this Declaration.
Exhibit
No.
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
K
L
Current
Parcel ID No.
4734 -17-7773
4734 -17-7868
4734 -17-8234
4734-17-8631
4734 17-8773
4734-17-8849
4734-17-9931
4734-18-6147
4734-18-7068
4734-18-7276
4734-18-8058
4734-18-8264
4734-18-9048
4734-18-9244
4734-27-0701
4734-27-0802
Former
Parcel ID No.
4734-17-7773
4734-17-7867
4734-17-8234
4734-17-8631
4734-17-8773
4734-17-8848
4734-17-9930
4734-18-6147
4734-18-
4734-18-
4734-18-
4734-18-
4734-18-
4734-18-
4734-27-
4734-27-
7069
7274
8059
8263
9049
9243
0701
0841
Deed Book/
Page No
2138/1610
Tracts # 2 & # 3
2138/1599
2138/1607
Tract #1
2138/1614
2138/1597
2138/1610
Tract # 1
2138/1612
2138/1607
Tract #2
2138/1603
2138/1603
2138/1603
2138/1603
2138/1601
2138/1601
1899/115
1899/948
Notice of Inactive
Hazardous Substance
or Waste Disposal Site
(Plat Parcel)
4-A
4-G
2
8
4-B
4-F
4-E
3
4-H
4-M
4-1
4-L
4-J
4-K
4-C
4-D
The Properties are also shown in Parcels 2, 3, 4A-M and 8 on a Notice of Inactive
Hazardous Substance or Waste Disposal Site constituting a survey plat that is concurrently being
recorded with this Declaration at Map Book foCg? Page 3| in the Office of the Register of
Deeds for Iredell County.
Page 2
K-38
-------
For the purpose of protecting public health and the environment, EPNG hereby declares
that all of the Properties shall be held, sold and conveyed subject to the following perpetual land
use restrictions, which shall run with the land; shall be binding on all parties having any right, title
or interest in the Properties or any part thereof, their heirs, successors and assigns; and shall, as
provided in N.C.G.S. Section 130A-310.3(f), be enforceable without regard to lack of privity of
estate or contract, lack of benefit to particular land, or lack of any property interest in particular
land. These restrictions shall continue in perpetuity and cannot be amended or canceled unless and
until the Iredell County Register of Deeds receives and records the written concurrence of the
Secretary of DEQ (or its successor in function), or his/her delegate. If any provision of this
Declaration is found to be unenforceable in any respect, the validity, legality, and enforceability
of the remaining provisions shall not in any way be affected or impaired.
PERPETUAL LAND USE RESTRICTIONS
1) Groundwater shall not be used for any purpose. The installation of groundwater wells or
other devices for access to groundwater for any purpose other than activities pursuant to
the remedy are prohibited without prior approval by North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources ("DEQ"), or its successor in function.
2) Surface water shall not be used for any purpose.
3) No part of the Properties shall be used for mining, extraction of coal, oil, gas or any other
minerals or non-mineral substances.
4) Engineering controls installed as part of the Site remedy, including groundwater
monitoring wells located on the Properties and engineered remedial appurtenances
installed in accordance with a Remedial Action Plan, shall not be altered or disturbed in
any way without prior approval in writing from DEQ. No alteration, disturbance or
removal of the existing soil, landscape and contours, other than measures approved by DEQ
or its successor in function necessary to implement or maintain the remedy, shall occur on
the Properties.
5) No building shall be constructed on any Property unless a vapor intrusion mitigation system
is installed, or in the alternative, a vapor intrusion assessment is performed in accordance
with guidelines issued by the USEPA or North Carolina, and a vapor mitigation system is
installed if required by the vapor intrusion assessment.
6) No building with a below grade structure used for human habitation, shall be constructed
on any Property.
7) No person conducting environmental assessment or remediation at the Properties, or
involved in determining compliance with applicable land use restrictions, at the direction
of, or pursuant to a permit or order issued by, DEQ or its successor in function may be
denied access to any Property for the purpose of conducting such activities. Each deed,
title or other instrument conveying an interest in any Property shall contain a notice that
the Property is subject to the access requirements in this paragraph.
8) Each person who owns any portion of the Properties shall cause the instrument of any sale,
lease, grant, or other transfer of any interest in the Properties to include a provision
expressly requiring the lessee, grantee, or transferee to comply with this Declaration. The
failure to include such provision shall not affect the validity or applicability of any land
Page 3
K-39
-------
use restriction in this Declaration.
9) A person who owns any Property or part thereof shall submit a letter report, containing the
notarized signature of the owner, in January of each year on or before January 31st, to the
Superfund Section of the Division of Waste Management of DEQ, or its successor in
function, confirming that this Declaration is still recorded in the Office of the Iredell
County Register of Deeds and that activities and conditions at the Property remain in
compliance with the land use restrictions herein.
10) Each deed, title or other instrument conveying an interest in any portion of the Properties
shall contain a notice that the Property is subject to the Consent Decree that was filed in
civil action no. 5:97CV198-V in the United States District Court for the Western District
of North Carolina, entitled "United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Beaunit Corporation;
Burlington Industries, Inc.; and El Paso Natural Gas Company, d/b/a El Paso Energy
Corporation, Defendants and any lien retained by the United States of America.
11) Each person who owns any portion of the Properties shall, at least 30 days prior to
conveyance of an interest in the Properties , give written notice of the Consent Decree to
the prospective grantee, and shall notify USEPA in writing of the proposed conveyance,
the name and address of the grantee, and the date on which notice was given to the grantee.
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES REMAIN ON THE PROPERTY, BUT ARE NOT A DANGER
TO PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT, PROVIDED THAT THE ABOVE
RESTRICTIONS, AND ANY OTHER MEASURES REQUIRED BY DEQ, ARE STRICTLY
COMPLIED WITH.
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
The owner of the Properties hereby represents and warrants to the other signatories hereto:
That the owner of the Properties is the sole owner of the Properties;
That the owner of the Properties holds fee simple title to the Properties free, clear and
unencumbered;
That the owner of the Properties has the power and authority to enter into this Declaration,
to grant the rights and interests herein provided and to carry out all obligations hereunder;
That the owner of the Properties has provided to DEQ the names of all other persons that
own an interest in or hold an encumbrance on the Properties and has notified such persons
of the owner's intention to enter into this Declaration; and
That this Declaration will not materially violate or contravene or constitute a material
default under any other agreement, document or instrument to which the owner of the
Properties is a party or by which the owner of the Properties may be bound or affected.
ENFORCEMENT
Page 4
K-40
-------
The above land use restrictions are an integral part of the remedy for the contamination at
the Site. Adherence to the restrictions is necessary to protect public health and the environment.
These land use restrictions shall be enforced by any owner, operator, or other party responsible for
any part of the Properties . The above land use restrictions may also be enforced by DEQ through
the remedies provided in N.C.G.S. Chapter 13OA, Article 1, Part 2 or by means of a civil action,
and may also be enforced by any unit of local government having jurisdiction over any part of the
Properties . Any attempt to cancel this Declaration without the approval of DEQ or its successor
in function shall constitute noncompliance with the Remedial Action Plan approved by DEQ for
the Site, and shall be subject to enforcement by DEQ to the full extent of the law. Failure by any
party required or authorized to enforce any of the above restrictions shall in no event be deemed a
waiver of the right to do so thereafter as to the same violation or as to one occurring prior or
subsequent thereto.
FUTURE SALES. LEASES, CONVEYANCES AND TRANSFERS
When any portion of the Properties is sold, leased, conveyed or transferred, pursuant to
N.C.G.S. Section 130A-310.8(e) the deed or other instrument of transfer shall contain in the
description section, in no smaller type than that used in the body of the deed or instrument, a
statement that the real property being sold, leased, conveyed, or transferred has been used as a
hazardous substance or waste disposal site and a reference by book and page to the recordation of
the Notice of Inactive Hazardous Substance or Waste Disposal Site referenced in this Declaration.
[Intentionally left blank/Signatures next page]
Page 5
K-41
-------
OWNER SIGNATURE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I, Floyd C. Robertson, exercising powenof attorney for El Paso Natural
Gas Company, LLC execute these presents on this AT^ay of /Vy* 20 .
Signature:
Signatory's name: FL()YD ^ROBERTSON
Signatory's title: Attorney-in-Fact
^poved
STATE OF COLORADO
COUNTY OF EL PASO
i,-J>rts< nn-fiyy, I , a Notary Public, do hereby certify that
Floyd C. Robertson personally appeared before me this day, declared that he is acting on behalf
of El Paso Natural Gas Company, now El Paso Natural Gas Company, LLC, and that by authority
duly given and proven by the power of attorney attached hereto, and as the act of El Paso Natural
Gas Company, LLC, he has signed this Declaration.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this l$tlav ofP^lfcfn£W. 20 $Q..
My Commission expires: )o n. \°i
[SEAL]
Notary Pkblic
DENISE M TONEY
NOTARY PUBLIC
STATE OF COLORADO
NOTARY ID # 20034035390
my COMMISSION EXPIRES OCTOBER 17 2019
Page 6
K-42
-------
APPROVAL AND CERTIFICATION OF THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT
OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
The foregoing Declaration of Perpetual Land Use Restrictions is hereby approved and
certified.
By:
JiiryBateson, WG., Chief
Super fund Section
Division of Waste Management
North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF VXdMJ)
I
\iXV\ LAmcC
J('m "p/iTp^n
a Notary Public, do hereby certify that
personally appeared before me this day,
produced proper identification in the form of ( 1C PJA S/l and signed this
Declaration.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of \i/?AtilKpQ 1*7.
qMIUa
My Commission expires: C (J ^ 2 D I ^
Notary Publi
KATHBEE^LANCE
NOTARY PUBLIC
WAKE COUNTY, N.C.
REGISTER OF DEEDS CERTIFICATION
The foregoing Declaration of Perpetual Land Use Restrictions is certified to be duly recorded at
the date and time, and the Book and Page, shown on the first page hereof.
Register of Deeds for Iredell County
By:
Name and Title
Page 7
K-43
-------
txh 'L 't A
EASTERN AND WESTERN PIPELINES GROUP
SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY
STATE OF TEXAS §
§ KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
COUNTY OF HARRIS §
Effective as of January 1, 2013, Joseph Listengart, as Vice President of each of the entities listed on
Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (each, a "Company" and collectively,
the "Companies"), does hereby designate, constitute and appoint each of the employees of Kinder
Morgan, Inc. and its affiliates listed on Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference
(each, an "Authorized Employee") to execute and deliver from time to time in the name of and for and
on behalf of any Company as its Attorney-in-Fact without corporate seal and without attestation:
1. Rights of way, easements, franchises, licenses, permits, privileges, agreements or similar
rights, for right of way purposes, over and through any lands owned, occupied or
administered by city, county, state, federal or tribal agencies or authorities or by individuals,
partnerships, institutions, organizations, companies, corporations, trusts, estates or other
entities (including the obtaining or modification of zoning, land use or similar ordinances
affecting any such lands); provided that the present value of the minimum payments to be
made by the Company pursuant to such right of way, agreement or other right does not
exceed $200,000;
2. Leases, subleases, licenses and other rights of access to, use or occupancy of, or ingress or
egress upon, lands owned, occupied or administered by city, county, state, federal or tribal
agencies or authorities or by individuals, partnerships, institutions, organizations,
companies, corporations, trusts, estates or other entities (including the obtaining or
modification of zoning, land use or similar ordinances affecting any such lands); provided
that the present value of the minimum payments to be made by the Company pursuant to
such lease or other right does not exceed $200,000;
3. Amendments and modifications of any of the foregoing; provided that (i) such amendment
or modification is entered into without relinquishment of any Company's rights thereunder
and (ii) the present value of the minimum payments to be made by the Company pursuant
to such right of way, lease, agreement or other right being amended or modified does not,
after giving effect to such amendment or modification, exceed $200,000;
4. Settlements of landowner property damage claims arising out of construction, operation,
maintenance or retirement of the Company's facilities; provided that the present value of
the payments to be made by the Company pursuant to such settlement does not exceed
$100,000; and provided, further, that the limited settlement authority granted hereby does
not include the authority to settle any matter that is in litigation, regardless of the amount
of the claim.
K-44
-------
5. Any and all applications (including stipulations, affidavits, certificates and other pertinent
documents) for, acceptances and acknowledgements of, agreements, documents and
instruments evidencing any of the foregoing.
Not by way of limitation, but by way of confirmation, the powers and authority hereby
conferred shall extend to and include any and all of the instruments for a Company and/or acts above
described which may cover or pertain to lands of the United States of America, or to be acquired by the
United States of America, lands of any State or Tribal or Allotted Indian Lands.
Nothing herein contained shall be construed to revoke or amend, or otherwise to limit or affect
the powers and authority granted under any other power of attorney executed by or on behalf of a
Company, except that each and every power of attorney granted prior to the execution of this power of
attorney to any Authorized Employee concerning the subject matter listed herein is hereby revoked
effective as of the date first set forth above.
Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, if any Authorized Employee in any way
exceeds his or her authority and power specified in this Special Power of Attorney, then the Company
shall not be bound by the representations of such Attorney-in-Fact, nor does the Company waive any
defenses which may be available to it to contest, negate or disaffirm the actions of such Attorney-in-
Fact.
The Companies hereby ratify and confirm any and all lawful actions taken by the Attorneys since
January 1, 2013 by virtue of this Special Power of Attorney, to the extent within the scope of authority
granted hereby.
The authority granted to an Authorized Employee hereby shall continue in full force and effect
until the earliest to occur of: (i) December 31, 2014, (ii) the time at which such Authorized Employee's
employment with Kinder Morgan, Inc. and its affiliates is terminated, and (iii) such time as the relevant
Company ceases to be an affiliate of, or a company managed or operated by an affiliate of, Kinder
Morgan, Inc., Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. or El Paso Pipeline Partners, L P.
Executed in Houston, Texas as of this of Marclv>0T3>on behalf of eacl>G0rnpany.
By:
K-45
-------
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF HARRIS
§
§
§
This instrument was signed before me on March
of each Company identified in this instrument.
by Joseph Listengart, Vice President
Given under my hand and seal of office this day and year aforesaid.
Gloria H®?Kl0t@
No*»nr
State of Dram
Co Tim E»p. 124HM1
m" ¦ . ..
JkUBL
My Commission Expires:
: /PjdjjbiZ
otary Public in and for the State of Tex
K-46
-------
EXHIBIT A
WESTERN PIPELINE GROUP COMPANIES
1. Bear Creek Storage Company, LLC.
a Lousiana limited liability company
2. Calnev Pipe Line LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
3. Camino Real Gathering Company, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability company
4. Central Florida Pipeline LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
5. Cheyenne Plains Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability company
6. CIG Gas Storage Company
a Delaware limited liability company
7. Colorado Interstate Gas Company, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability company
8. Cypress Interstate Pipeline LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
9. Eagle Ford Crossover LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
10. El Paso Midstream Investment Company, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability company
11. El Paso Midstream Group LLC
a Delaware limited liability
12. El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability company
13. Elba Express Company, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability company
14. Elba Liquefaction Company, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability company
K-47
-------
15. Gulf LNG Energy, LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
16. Gulf LNG Pipeline, LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
17. Horizon Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability company
18. Kinder Morgan Border Pipeline LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
19. Kinder Morgan Cochin LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
20. Kinder Morgan Crossover LLC
a Delaware liability company
BY: Kinder Morgan Operating L.P. "A"
a Delaware limited partnership and its managing member
21. Kinder Morgan Crude & Condensate LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
22. Kinder Morgan Eagle Ford LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
23. Kinder Morgan Freedom Pipeline LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
24. Kinder Morgan Illinois Pipeline LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
25. Kinder Morgan Liquids Terminals LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
26. Kinder Morgan Louisiana Pipeline LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
27. Kinder Morgan North Texas Pipeline LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
28. Kinder Morgan NatGas Operator LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
K-48
-------
29. Kinder Morgan Petcoke, LP.
a Delaware limited partnership
BY: Kinder Morgan Petcoke GP LLC,
its general partner
a Delaware limited liability company
30. Kinder Morgan Pecos Valley LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
31. Kinder Morgan Southeast Terminals LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
32. Kinder Morgan Tank Storage Terminals LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
33. Kinder Morgan Tejas Pipeline LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
34. Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
35. Kinder Morgan Utica LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
36. KinderHawk Field Services LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
37. Midcontinent Express Pipeline LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
38. Mojave Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability Company
39. Mojave Pipeline Operating Company, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability Company
40. Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
41. Parkway Pipeline LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
42. Plantation Pipe Line Company
a Delaware limited liability company
43. Ruby Pipeline, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability company
K-49
-------
44. Southern LNG Company, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability company
45. Sierrita Gas Pipeline LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
46. Southern Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability company
47. SFPP, LP.
a Delaware limited partnership
By Kinder Morgan Operating L.P. "D"
Its General Partner
By Kinder Morgan G.P., Inc.
Its General Partner
By Kinder Morgan Management, LLC
The Delegate of the General Partner
48. Tejas Gas, LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
49. Tejas Natural Gas, LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
50. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability company
51. TransColorado Gas Transmission Company LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
52. WYCO Development LLC
a Colorado limited liability company
BY: Colorado Interstate Gas Company, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability and its member
53. Wyoming Interstate Company, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability company
K-50
-------
54. Young Gas Storage, Ltd.
a Colorado limited partnership
BY: CIG Gas Storage Company
a Delaware corporation and Its sole General Partner
K-51
-------
EXHIBIT i
AUTHORIZED EMPLOYEES
Daniel G. Gredvig
Floyd C. Robertson
K-52
-------
EXHIBITS A-L
Legal Descriptions of Properties Subject to Declaration
Page 8
K-53
-------
Ex. A to BI Plant Site DPLUR
PIN 4734 -17-7773 - Tracts 2 & 3
Notice of Inactive Hazardous Substance Type: CRP
or Waste Disposal Site (Plat Parcel 4-A) Recorded: 9/30/2011 11:48:26 AM
FeeAmt: $22.00 Page lot 2
Revenue Tax: $0.00
Iredell County, NC
Matthew J. McCall Register of Deeds
BK 2138 PG 1610-1611
NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL WARRANTY DEED
Mail after recording to: El Paso Natural Gas, Corporate Real Estate, 1001 Louisiana, 10* Floor, Houston, TX 77002
This instrument prepared by: Jay Gallia, Esquire, El Paso Energy Service Co, 1001 Louisiana, Houston, TX 77002
Brief description for the index: 3 Tracts, Statesvilie, NC _
tjer T*yro *13
THIS DEED made this the day of August, in the year 2011, by and between
Grantor
Grantee
' EL PASO REMDIATION COMPANY,
EL PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY,
a Delaware corporation,
a Delaware corporation,
Whose address is:
Whose address is:
c/o Corporate Real Estate
c/o Corporate Real Estate
1001 Louisiana
1001 Louisiana
Houston, TX 77002
Houston, TX 77002
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and
assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by context.
WITNESSETH, that the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which
is hereby acknowledged, has and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee
in fee simple, that certain lot or parcel of land situated in the City of Statesvilie, Iredell County, North
Carolina, and more particularly described as follows:
flU£Tl: BEING all of Lot Fourteen (14) of the Subdivision of Ruth D^Caahw
kDownas~*W«id8ver Woods", as platted and planned jon-4Mmniirffiereof. by L.B.
Grier, Registered Surygvwviiated M«L5^4369TSS5"recorded in Plat Book 10, Page
34, Iredell C.nnnty. Registry, to which map reference is hereby
midr fiTTTTirffaiiirt complete description ofsSBsTtote-
TRACT 2: BEING all of Lot 7 of Block G of the subdivision of the T.M. Miller
property as platted and planned on a map thereof by Gilbert Engineering Co. dated
July 1936 aid recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 17, Iredell County, North Carolina
Public Registry, to which map reference is hereby made for a full and complete
description of said lots.
RETURN RECORDED DOCUMENT TO:
Carrie Cavalier, First American Title, 24 Greenway Plaza,
Ste#850J-)ouston, TX 77046/Tel: (713) 346-1653
ncs# Soivcr
Book: 2138 Page: 1610 Page 1 of 2
K-54
-------
Ex. A to BI Pliant Site DPLUR
PIN 4734 -17-7773 - Tracts 2 & 3
Notice of Inactive Hazardous Substance
or Waste Disposal Site (Plat Parcel 4-A)
TRACT 3: BEGINNING at a stake two feet West of Maple tree on the North side of
Feimster Street; thence N 10 cleg. 30 minutes West 170 feet to a stake in the center of
a ditch; thence South 86 deg. 37 minutes East 81.8 feet to an iron stake; thence South
3 deg. 11 minutes West 164 feet to a stake on the North side of Feimster Street; thence
South 89 West 46 feet along said street to the beginning, containing 1/4 of an acre
more or less. This being a part of the property conveyed to J.S. Moore by deed of
Albert K. Cooper, dated November 10.1932, recorded in Deed Book 100, Page 466.
Grantor acquired the property hereinabove described by instrument recorded in Deed Book 1749 at page
1374-1377.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and appurtenances
thereto belonging to the Grantee in fee simple.
And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor is seized of the premises in fee simple, has the
right to convey the same in fee simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of all encumbrances, and
that Grantor will warrant and defend the title against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever, except
for the exceptions stated. Title to the property hereinabove described is subject to the following
exceptions:
ANY AND ALL OF PUBLIC RECORD
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused this instrument to be signed in its corporate name by
its duly authorized officer, the day and year first above written.
GRANTOR: EL PASO REMED
By:
'NcmmwY
Name: Ji
Title: Vifcrfresident
Tj
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF HARRIS
I, a Notary Public, in and for the State and County aforesaid, do hereby certify that John H.
Anderson personally appeared before me and being duly sworn says that he or she is a duly authorized
agent of said above named corporation and as such has the authority to act in and for said corporation. I
have personal knowledge of the identity of the above named authorized agent, and that he or she signed
the foregoing or annexed instrument on behalf of said corporation in the capacity so herein stated and
acknowledge the said writing to be the act and deed of said corporation herein stated.
Witness my band and official seal or stamp, this^^^t^day of August, in the year 2011.
Book: 2138 Page: 1610 Page 2 of 2
K-55
-------
Ex. B to Bl Plant Site DPLUR
PIN 4734-17-7868; Former PIN 4734-17-7867 Type: CRP
Notice of Inactive Hazardous Substance or Waste Disposal Sit* (Plat Parcel 4 G) Recorded: 9/30/2011 11:48:26 AM
FeeAmt: $22.00 Pag« 1 of 2
Revenue Tax: $0.00
Iredell County, NC
Matthew J. McCall Register of Deads
BK 2138 PG 1599-1600
NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL WARRANTY DEED
Mail after recording to: El Paso Natural Gas, Corporate Real Estate, 1001 Louisiana, 104 Floor, Houston, TX 77002
This instrument prepared by: Jay Gallia, Esquire, El Paso Energy Service Co, 1001 Louisiana, Houston. TX 77002
Brief description for the index: Lot 13 of Wendover Woods
*JL T**- T° *****
A
THIS DEED made this the /o day of August, in the year 2011, by and between
Grantor
Grantee
EL PASO REMEDIATION COMPANY.
EL PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY,
a Delaware corporation,
a Delaware corporation,
Whose address is:
Whose address is:
c/o Corporate Real Estate
c/o Corporate Real Estate
1001 Louisiana
1001 Louisiana
Houston, TX 77002
Houston, TX 77002
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and
assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by context.
WITNESSETH, that the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which
is hereby acknowledged, has and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee
in fee simple, that certain lot or parcel of land situated in the City of Statesville, Iredell County, North
Carolina, and more particularly described as follows:
Being all of Lot Number Thirteen (13) of the Subdivision of Ruth D. Gaston
known as "Wendover Woods", as platted, planned on a map thereof, by L.B.
Grier, Registered Surveyor, dated May 5, 1969, and recorded in Plat Book 10,
page 34, Iredell County Registry, and to which map reference Is hereby made for
a full and complete description.
RETURN RECORDED DOCUMENT TO:
Carrie Cavalier, First American Title, 24 Greenway Plaza,
Ste#850. Houston. TX 77046/Tel: (713)346-1653
NCS* -5°* 9 .TP
Book: 2138 Page: 1599 Page 1 of 2
K-56
-------
Ex. B to B! Plant Site DPLUR
PIN 4734 -17-7868; Former PIN 4734 -17-7867
Notice of Inactive Hazardous Substance or Waste Disposal Site (Plat Parcel 4 G)
Grantor acquired the property hereinabove described by instrument recorded in Deed Book 1755 at page
93. A map showing the above-described property is recorded in Map Book 10 at page 34.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and appurtenances
thereto belonging to the Grantee in fee simple.
And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor is seized of the premises in fee simple, has the
right to convey the same in fee simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of all encumbrances, and
that Grantor will warrant and defend the title against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever, except
for the exceptions stated. Title to the property hereinabove described is subject to the following
exceptions:
NBLAWMLSIMmUSiBIGam
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused this instrument to be signed in its corporate name by
its duly authorized officer, the day and year first above written.
GRANTOR: EL PASO RE
JwwH. Anderson
Vice President
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF HARRIS
1, a Notary Public, in and for the State and County aforesaid, do hereby certify that John H.
Anderson personally appeared before me and being duly sworn says that he or she is a duly authorized
agent of said above named corporation and as such has the authority to act in and for said corporation. 1
have personal knowledge of the identity of the above named authorized agent, and that he or she signed
the foregoing or annexed instrument on behalf of said corporation in the capacity so herein stated and
acknowledge the said writing to be the act and deed of said corporation herein stated.
Witness my hand and official seal or stamp, this
RMH&ieoan
mr common amies
•z^-^Lday
of August, in the year 2011.
Book: 2138 Page: 1599 Page 2 of 2
K-57
-------
Type: CRP
Rscordsd: 9/30/2011 11:48:26 AM
Fee Amt: $25.00 Page 1 of 3
Revenue Tax: $0.00
Iredell County. NC
Matthew J. McCall Register of Deeds
BK 2138 PG 1607-1609
NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL WARRANTY DEED
Mail after recording to: El Paso Natural Gas, Corporate Real Estate, 1001 Louisiana, 10th Fl, Houston, TX 77002
This instrument prepared by: Jay Gallia, Esquire, El Paso Energy Service Co, 1001 Louisiana, Houston, TX 77002
Brief description for the index: 2 Tracts, Statesville, NC
P)cux*.t<^ *jer t-v-pp n-snrnxm
THIS DEED made this the day of August, in the year 2011, by and between
Grantor
Grantee
EL PASO REMEDIATION COMPANY.
EL PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY,
a Delaware corporation,
a Delaware corporation,
Whose address is:
Whose address is:
c/o Corporate Real Estate
c/o Corporate Real Estate
1001 Louisiana
1001 Louisiana
Houston, TX 77002
Houston, TX 77002
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and
assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by context.
WITNESSETH, that the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which
is hereby acknowledged, has and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee
in fee simple, that certain lot or parcel of land situated in the City of Statesville, Iredell County, North
Carolina, and more particularly described as follows:
TRACT ONE - BEGINNING at a stake in the center of the Statesville-Tay loraville
Railroad track (also known as the Alexander Railroad, under lease to Norfork
Southern Corporation, having a claimed right-of-way width of 20®') at the State
Farm Corner N/F, thence North 03 degrees 50' East 665.15 feet to an iron stake in the
State Farm N/F and Miller N/F line; thence South 86 degrees 10* East 580.74 feet to
an iron stake; thence South 03 degrees 50' West 934.5 feet to the center of the
Statesville-Taylorsville Railroad track; thence with the centeriine of said railroad
track, North 61 degrees 19' West 640 feet to the point of BEGINNING, containing 10
acres, and feeing the identical tract of land which R. L. Crawley, C. E., surveyed and
staked out for the T. D. Miller heirs on April 27, 1927; together with the right of
ingress, egress and regress along and over a strip of land not less than thirty-six feet
wide and extending along the eastern boundary of the above described tract of land
RETURN RECORDED DOCUMENT TO:
Carrie Cavalier, First American Title, 24 Greenway Plaza.
Ste#850,Houston,TX 77046/Tel: (713)346-1653
EX. C to Bi Plant Site DPLUR
PIN 4734 -17-8234, Tract One
Notice of Inactive Hazardous Substance or Waste Disposal Site
{Plat Parcel 2)
Book: 2138 Page: 1607 Page 1 of 3
K-58
-------
EX. C to B! Plant Site DPLUR
PIN 4734 -17-8234, Tract One
Notice of Inactive Hazardous Substance or Waste Disposal Site
(Plat Par,gj[^j,eBce j„ a straight line across the railroad aad the lands of the T. D. Miller beirs
public highway (said strip now being a portion of Phoenix Avenue having a
right-of-way width of40 feet).
This description having been modified by boundary line agreement with the State of
North Carolina recorded in Deed Book 277, page 76.
Excepted all that tract described in Deed dated September 24, 1985, and recorded
indeed Book 721, page 173..
TRACT TWO - BEGINNING at an existing axle, the southeast corner of Lot 26 in
Wendover Hills (Subdivision) as recorded in Plat Book 5 at page 125, property of
Robert T. Brad bars, Jr. as described in Deed Book 825 at Page 20, the southwest
corner of Lot 33 in Wendover Hilb (Subdivision) as recorded in Plat Book 5 at Page
125, property of Donna Suther Vaughn as described in Deed Book 433 at Page 50,
and the northeast corner of Paul L. Gilbert, Jr., et al, as described in Deed Book 793
at Page 772, said axle being located South 33 degrees 43' 03" East 2690.46 feet from
North Carolina Geodetic Survey concrete monument "PAPER" which has
coordinates of North - 750,775.72 feet and East » 1,430,09539 feet; thence running
with the line of Donna Suther Vaughn and Jean O. Vanght South 85 degrees 52' 07"
East 149.13 feet to an existing iron pin in the southern line of Jean O. Vanght as
described in Deed Book 641 at page 147, said iron pin being the northwest corner of
Lot 24 in Wendover Woods (Subdivision) as recorded in Plat Book 10 at page 134,
property of Jimmy D. Abshire as described in Deed Book 761 at Page 297; thence
running with the western line of Lots 24, 19, 18 and 13 Wendover Woods
(Subdivision), Jimmy D. Abshire, Wanda A Leatz as described in Deed Book 610 at
Page 433, and Carl L. Crawford as described in Deed Book 181 at Page 263, South 02
degrees 47' 05" West 732.00 feet to an existing iron pipe, a corner of Carl L.
Crawford; thence running with the western line of Carl L. Crawford South 09
degrees 47' 56" East 167.64 feet to an existing iron pin, the southwest corner of Carl
L. Crawford in the northern line of Paul L. Gilbert, Jr. as described in Deed Book
721 at Page 176; thence running with the northern line of Paul L. Gilbert, Jr. North
88 degrees 04' 22" West 195.68 feet to an iron pin set, the northeast corner of Paul L.
Gilbert, Jr. in the eastern line of Paul L. Gilbert, Jr., et al (as first mentioned above);
thence running with the eastern line of Paul L. Gilbert, Jr., et al, North 03 degrees 25'
23" East 902.10 feet to the point and place of BEGINNING, containing 3.250 acres,
more or less.
Grantor acquired the property hereinabove described by instrument recorded in Deed Book 1513 at page
2834-2856.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and appurtenances
thereto belonging to the Grantee in fee simple.
And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor is seized of the premises in fee simple, has the
right to convey the same in fee simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of all encumbrances, and
that Grantor will warrant and defend the title against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever, except
for the exceptions stated. Title to the property hereinabove described is subject to the following
exceptions:
ANY AND ALL OF PUBLIC RECORD
Book: 2138 Page: 1607 Page 2 of 3
K-59
-------
EX. C to Bl Plant Site DPLUR
PIN 4734 -17-8234, Tract One
Notice of inactive Hazardous Substance or Waste Disposal Site
18aWf¥FJi!sS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused this instrument to be signed in its corporate name by
its duly authorized officer, the day and year first above written.
GRANTOR: ELPASC
Name: Jo
Title: V
By:
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF HARRIS
1, a Notary Public, in and for the State and County aforesaid, do hereby certify that John H.
Anderson personalty appeared before me and being duly sworn says that he or she is a duly authorized
agent of said above named corporation and as such has the authority to act in and for said corporation. I
have personal knowledge of the identity of the above named authorized agent, and that he or she signed
the foregoing or annexed instrument on behalf of said corporation in the capacity so herein stated and
acknowledge the said writing to be the act and deed of said corporation herein stated.
Witness my hand and official seal or stamp, this day of August, in the year 2011.
rNomy Public C^ei'crf ^Signature
Book: 2138 Page: 1607 Page 3 of 3
K-60
-------
Ex. D to Bl Plant Site DPLUR
PIN 4734-17-8631
Notice of inactive Hazardous Substance
or Waste Disposal Site (Plat Parcel 8)
Type: CRP
Recorded: 9/30/2011 11:48:26 AM
Fee Ami: $25.00 Page 1 of 3
Revenue Tax: $0.00
Iredell County. NO
Matthew J. McCall Register of Deeds
BK 2138 PG 1614-1616
NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL WARRANTY DEED
Mail after recording to: EI Paso Natural Gas, Corporate Real Estate, 1001 Louisiana, 10* Floor, Houston, TX 77002
This instrument prepared by: Jay Gallia, Esquire, El Paso Energy Service Co, 1001 Louisiana, Houston, TX 77002
Brief description for the index: Yadkin Street, Statesville, NC
TdA/TO
THIS DEED made this the 23> day of August, in the year 2011, by and between
Grantor
Grantee
EL PASO REMMATION COMPANY,
EL PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY,
a Delaware corporation,
a Delaware corporation,
Whose address is:
Whose address is:
c/o Corporate Real Estate
c/o Corporate Real Estate
1001 Louisiana
1001 Louisiana
Houston, TX 77002
Houston, TX 77002
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and
assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by context.
WITNESSETH, that the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which
is hereby acknowledged, has and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee
in fee simple, that certain lot or parcel of land situated in the City of Statesville, Iredell County, North
Carolina, and more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at an existing iron pin said pin being located in the southeast comer of
Lot 10 of Wendover Woods as the same is platted in Plat Book 101 Page 1341 Iredell
County Registry; running thence across a right of way for Yadkin Street South
01°46'05" West with the western right of way of Phoenix Street 92 feet to an iron pin
set in the western right of way of Phoenix Street; thence in a carve to the left said curve
having a radius of 20 feet, an arc distance of 31.33 feet, a chord bearing of North
43°12'06" West and a chord distance of 28.22 feet to an iron pin set; thence along and
with the line of Parcel 2 North 88°04'22" West 119.85 feet to an iron pin set; thence in a
carve to the left said curve having a radius of 119.28 feet, an arc distance of 62.45 feet,
a chord bearing of South 76°55'35" West, and a chord distance of 61.74 feet to an iron
pin set; thence with a carve to the right said curve having a radius of 179.28 feet, an arc
RETURN RECORDED DOCUMENT TO:
Carrie Cavalier, First American Title, 24 Graenway Plaza,
Ste#850, Houston, TX 77046/Tel: (713)346-1653
NCS#_J5MSST
Book: 2138 Page: 1614 Page 1 of 3
K-61
-------
Ex. D to Bl Plant Site DPLUR
PIN 4734-17-8631
Notice of Inactive Hazardous Substance
or Waste Disposal Site (Plat Parcel 8)
distance of 93.87 feet, a chord bearing of South 76°55'39" West and a chord distance of
92.80 feet to an iron pin let; thence continuing along and with the lilt of Parcel 2 North
88°@4'22" West 291.85 feet to an iron pin set a comer of Burlington Industrie*, Inc.
formerly North Carolina Piedmont Experiment Station; thence North 02°04'42" East
60.0 feet to an iron pin set a corner of Parcel 3; thence along and with the line of Parcel
3 South 88°04'22" East 195.68 feet to an existing iron pin; thence North 09°44'31"
West 41.07 feet to the southwest corner of El Paso Remediation, Inc. formerly Carl L.
Crawford; thence along and with the lines of El Paso Remediation and Jeffrey Allen
Motley and Wife, Cheryl Ann Moteiy and Lots 11 and 10 of Wendover Woods South
87°47'27" East 377.63 feet to a concrete monnment thence in a curve to the left having
a radios of 15.0 feet and a distance of 25.54 to an existing iron pin the southeast corner
of Lot 10 of Wendover Woods the point and place of the beginning. The description
contains a 40 foot right of way for Yadkin Street formerly known as Feiraster Street
shown on plats recorded in Piat Book 2, Page 17 and Plat Book 101 Page 134. The
property is shown on a survey prepared for Burlington Industries, Inc. by Gerald v.
Grant and Associates dated November 18,2002 recorded in Plat Book 41, Pages 89 and
90, Iredell County Registry.
Grantor acquired the property hereinabove described by instrument recorded in Deed Book 1858 at page
1872-1875.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and appurtenances
thereto belonging to the Grantee in fee simple.
And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor is seized of the premises in fee simple, has the
right to convey the same in fee simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of all encumbrances, and
that Grantor will warrant and defend the title against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever, except
for the exceptions stated. Title to the property hereinabove described is subject to the following
exceptions:
ANY AND ALL OF PUBLIC RECORD
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused this instrument to be signed in its corporate name by
its duly authorized officer, the day and year first above written.
GRANTOR: EL PASO REMEDIATION Cj
By: l_
Name: JStwSrXnderson
Title: Vic/ President
Tvi
Book: 2138 Page: 1614 Page 2 of 3
K-62
-------
Ex. E to 81 Plant Site DPLUR
PIN 4734-17-8773 Notice of Inactive Hazardous Substance
or Waste Disposal Site Plat Parcel 4 B
Type: CRP
Recorded: 9/30/2011 11:48:26 AM
Fee Amt. $22.00 Page 1 of 2
Revenue Tax: $0.00
Iredell County. NC
Matthew J. McCall Register of Deeds
BK 2138 PG 1597-1598
NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL WARRANTY DEED
Mail after ratatding toi El Pmb >la1nrel Gam Camiirate Real IjotaHi) OOt l»eniniawa, 10th Fl, Hawrtan, TX 77002
This instrument prepared by: Jay Gallia, Esquire, El Paso Energy Service Co, 1001 Louisiana, Houston, TX 77002
Brief description for the index: Lot 12 of Wendovcr Woods subdivision
*0 -TwSO-
THIS DEED made this the 23^ day of August, in the year 2011, by and between
Grantor
Grantee
EL PASO KEMDIATION COMPANY,
EL PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY,
a Delaware corporation,
a Delaware corporation,
Whose address is:
Whose address is:
c/o Corporate Real Estate
c/o Corporate Real Estate
1001 Louisiana
1001 Louisiana
Houston, TX 77002
Houston, TX 77002
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and
assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by context.
WITNESSETH, that the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which
is hereby acknowledged, has and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee
in fee simple, that certain lot or parcel of land situated in the City of Statesville, Iredell County, North
Carolina, and more particularly described as follows:
Being all of Lot Twelve (12) of the Subdivision of Ruth D. Gaston known as
"Wendover Woods", as platted and planed on a map thereof, by L.B. Grier,
Registered Surveyor, dated May 5. 1969, and recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 34,
Iredell County. North Carolina. Public Registry, to which map reference is hereby
made for a full and complete description of said lot.
RETURN RECORDED DOCUMENT TO:
Oil 6«va*w, Fnt Amarican Title, Creanway PI«Ta,
—
NT.S«
After rgcording/rgiuF-n tn-
Fires American Title Insurance Co.
ChrhtopherJ. Albee, Esquire
»1 S College Street, Suite 1440
Charlotte, NC 28244
File No. TSB
Book: 2138 Page: 1597 Page 1 of 2
K-63
-------
Ex. E to 61 Plant Sit® DPLUR
PIN 4734-17-8773 Notice of Inactive Hazardous Substance
or Waste Disposal Site Plat Parcel 4 B
Grantor acquired the property hereinabove described by instrument recorded in Deed Book 1749 at page
1143-1145. A map showing the above-described property is recorded in Map Book 10 at page 34.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and appurtenances
thereto belonging to the Grantee in fee simple.
And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor is seized of the premises in fee simple, has the
right to convey the same in fee simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of all encumbrances, and
that Grantor will warrant and defend the title against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever, except
for the exceptions stated. Title to the property hereinabove described is subject to the following
exceptions:
ANY Am ALL OF PUBLIC RECOUP
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused this instrument to be signed in its corporate name by
its duly authorized officer, the day and year first above written.
GRANTOR: EL PASO REME
By:
Name:
Title:
ON COMPANY
QJL-
l\4
. Anderson
: President
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF HARRIS
1, a Notary Public, in and for the State and County aforesaid, do hereby certify that John H.
Anderson personally appeared before me and being duly sworn says that he or she is a duly authorized
agent of said above named corporation and as such has the authority to act in and for said corporation. I
have personal knowledge of the identity of the above named authorized agent, and that he or she signed
the foregoing or annexed instrument on behalf of said corporation in the capacity so herein stated and
acknowledge the said writing to be the act and deed of said corporation herein stated.
Witness my hand and official seal or stamp, this of August, in the year 20 U.
Notary Public Officipl Signatured?
Book: 2138 Pages: 1597 Page 2 of 2
K-64
-------
Ex. F to Bl Plant Site DPLUR
PIN 4734-17-8849-Tract 1
Notice of Inactive Hazardous
Substance or Waste Disposal Site (Plat
Parcel 4-F)
Type: CRP
Recorded: 9/30/2011 11:48:26 AM
Fee Amt: $22.00 Page 1 of 2
Revenue Tax: $0.00
Iredell County, NC
Matthew J. McCall Register of Deeds
BK 2138 PG 1610-1611
NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL WARRANTY DEED
Mail after recording to: El Paso Natural Gas, Corporate Real Estate, 1001 Louisiana, 10th Floor, Houston, TX 77002
This instrument prepared by: Jay Gallia, Esquire, El Paso Energy Service Co, 1001 Louisiana, Houston, TX 77002
Brief description for the index: 3 Tracts, Statesville, NC
THIS DEED made this the day of August, in the year 2011, by and between
Grantor
Grantee
EL PASO REMDIATION COMPANY,
EL PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY,
a Delaware corporation,
a Delaware corporation,
Whose address is:
Whose address is:
c/o Corporate Real Estate
c/o Corporate Real Estate
1001 Louisiana
1001 Louisiana
Houston, TX 77002
Houston, TX 77002
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and
assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by context.
WITNESSETH, that the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which
is hereby acknowledged, has and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee
in fee simple, that certain lot or parcel of land situated in the City of Statesville, Iredell County, North
Carolina, and more particularly described as follows:
TRACT 1: BEING all of Lot Fourteen (14) of the Subdivision of Ruth D. Gaston
known as "Wendover Woods", as platted and planned on a map thereof, by L.B.
Grier, Registered Surveyor, dated May 5,196% and recorded in Plat Book 19, Page
34, Iredell County, North Carolina, Public Registry, to which nap reference b hereby
made for a full and complete description of said lots
KING all of Lot 7 of Block G of the subdivision of the '
property as platted ai
July 1936 and recorded in
Public
i of said lots.
aap thereof bv
pffiSering i
; Co. dated
North Carolina
map reference is hereby made for a fall ana
RETURN RECORDED DOCUMENT TO:
Came Cavalier. First American Title. 24 Greeaway Plaza,
Sta#850Jtouston,TX 77046/Tel: (713)346-1653
ncss Sosi
-------
' 3: BEGINNING at a stoke two feet West of Mapie tree on. the Northj
FdwterSirlRr^ciceN 11 deg. 30 minute West 170 feet toajtftkMtrtfiTeeiiter of
a ditch; tbeace S«ith8?l^r9Zj||lniite East ShSkgtJ»^nrffvtist»lue; theace Sooth
3 deg. 11 niiilct West 164 feet toast£K£v»4!S^ortti side of Feimster Stmt; theace
South 89 West 46 feetaioggJNritf~Sireetto tkeb$hfig^tgjt*iaigt 1/4 of aa acre
more or Imjkh^el^i ptrt of the property coaveyed to j5TWww*Jjj_deed of
3>oper, dated November 10.1932, recorded in Deed Book 10®, Page'
Grantor acquired the property hereinabove described by instrument recorded in Deed Book 1749 at page
1374-1377.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and appurtenances
thereto belonging to the Grantee in fee simple.
And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor is seized of the premises in fee simple, has the
right to convey the same in fee simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of all encumbrances, and
that Grantor will warrant and defend the title against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever, except
for the exceptions stated. Title to the property hereinabove described is subject to the following
exceptions:
ANY AM? ALL OF PUBLIC MEgO™
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused this instrument to be signed in its corporate name by
its duly authorized officer, the day and year first above written.
GRANTOR:
EL PASO KEMEDl
f
By:
Name: Ji
Title: V
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF HARRIS
1, a Notary Public, in and for the State and County aforesaid, do hereby certify that John H.
Anderson personally appeared before me and being duly sworn says that he or she is a duly authorized
agent of said above named corporation and as such has the authority to act in and for said corporation. I
have personal knowledge of the identity of the above named authorized agent, and that he or she signed
the foregoing or annexed instrument on behalf of said corporation in the capacity so herein stated and
acknowledge the said writing to be the act and deed of said corporation herein stated.
Witness my hand and official seal or stamp, this^^^/day of August, in the year 2011.
Book: 2138 Page: 1610 Page 2 of 2
K-66
-------
Ex G to 81 Plant Site DPLUR
PIN 4734-17-9931 (former PIN 4734-17-9930)
Notice of Inactive Hazardous Substance
or Waste Disposal Site Plat Parcel 4 E
Type: CRP
Recorded: 9/30/2011 11:48:26 AM
Fee Ami: $22.00 Page 1 of 2
Revenue Tax: $0.00
fredell County, NC
Matthew J. McCalt Register of Deeds
BK 2138 PG 1612-1613
NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL WARRANTY DEED
Mail after recording to: El Paso Natural Gas, Corporate Real Estate, 1001 Louisiana, 10th Floor, Houston, TX 77002
This instrument prepared by: Jay Gallia, Esquire, El Paso Energy Service Co, 1001 Louisiana, Houston, TX 77002
Brief description for the index: North 72.5 feet of Lot 15 of Wendover Woods
MX HT-ZHnWIfO
THIS DEED made this the >5 day of August, in the year 2011, by and between
Grantor
Grantee
EL PASO CORPORATION,
EL PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY,
a Delaware corporation,
a Delaware corporation,
Whose address is:
Whose address is:
c/o Corporate Real Estate
c/o Corporate Real Estate
1001 Louisiana
100! Louisiana
Houston, TX 77002
Houston, TX 77002
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and
assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by context.
WITNESSETH, that the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which
is hereby acknowledged, has and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee
in fee simple, that certain lot or parcel of land situated in the City of Statesville, Iredell County, North
Carolina, and more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at an existing iron pis located at tbe Southwest corner of Lot No.7 and the
Northwest corner of Lot No. 8 of tbe subdivision known as "WENDOVER WOODS" as
the same is platted, planned! and recorded in Flat Book 10, page 34, Iredell County
Registry; thence from the place and point of beginning with the common lot lino of Lots
Nos. 7 and 15 of said subdivision, North 2 deg. 18 min. East 72.5 feet to tbe Northwest
corner of Lot No.7 and tbe Northeast corner of Lot No. 15; thence with the Northern line
of Lot No. 15 and tbe South margin of Reid Street South 88 deg. 45 min. West 90 feet to
as iron pin, Northwest corner of Lot No. 15; thence with the common line between Lots
Nos. 15 and 14, South 2 deg, 18 min. West 72.5 feet to an iron pin, a new corner for Doris
M. Kinard; thence a new line of Kinard, South 88 deg. 45 min. East 90 feet to tbe
beginning, containing 6,512.47 square feet, and being the North 72.5 feet of Lot No. 15 of
"WENDOVER WOODS" as the same is platted, planned and recorded in Flat Book 10,
page 34, Iredell County Registry.
RETURN RECORDED DOCUMENT TO:
Carrie Cavalier, First American Title. 24 Grsenway Plaza,
Sta# 850, Houston, TX 77046 / Tel: (713? 346-1653
NCSf SOS^S.
Book: 2138 Page: 1612 Page 1 of 2
K-67
-------
ExGtoBI Plant Site DPLUR
PIN 4734-17-9931 (former PIN 4734-17-9930)
Notice of Inactive Hazardous Substance
or Waste Disposal Site Piat Parcel 4 E
Grantor acquired the property hereinabove described by instrument recorded in Deed Book 1964 at page
4-6. A map showing the above-described property is recorded in Plat Book 10 at page 34.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and appurtenances
thereto belonging to the Grantee in fee simple.
And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor is seized of the premises in fee simple, has the
right to convey the same in fee simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of all encumbrances, and
that Grantor will warrant and defend the title against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever, except
for the exceptions stated. Title to the property hereinabove described is subject to the following
exceptions:
ANY AND ALL OF PUBLIC RECORD
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused this instrument to be signed in its corporate name by
its duly authorized officer, the day and year first above written.
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF HARRIS
I, a Notary Public, in and for the State and County aforesaid, do hereby certify that John H.
Anderson personally appeared before me and being duly sworn says that he or she is a duly authorized
agent of said above named corporation and as such has the authority to act in and for said corporation. I
have personal knowledge of the identity of the above named authorized agent, and that he or she signed
the foregoing or annexed instrument on behalf of said corporation in the capacity so herein stated and
acknowledge the said writing to be the act and deed of said corporation herein stated.
Witness my hand and official seal or stamp, this day of August, in the year 2011.
i
-S5-I
Notary Public Official Signature
Book: 2138 Page: 1612 Page 2 of 2
K-68
-------
EX. H to B! Plant Site DPLUR
PIN 4734-18-6147 Tract 2
Notice of Inactive Hazardous Substance or Waste Disposal Site
(Plat Parcel 3)
Type: CRP
Recorded: 9/30/2011 11:48:26 AM
Fee Amt: $25.00 Page 1 of 3
Revenue Tax: $0.00
Iredell County, NC
Matthew J. McCall Register of Deeds
BK 2138 PG 1607-1609
NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL WARRANTY DEED
Mail after recording to: El Paso Natural Gas, Corporate Real Estate, 1001 Louisiana, 10th Fl, Houston, TX 77002
This instrument prepared by: Jay Gallia, Esquire, El Paso Energy Service Co, 1001 Louisiana, Houston, TX 77002
Brief description for the index: 2 Tracts, Statesville, NC
THIS DEED made this the day of August, in the year 2011, by and between
Grantor
Grantee
EL PASO REMEDIATION COMPANY.
EL PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY,
a Delaware corporation,
a Delaware corporation,
Whose address is:
Whose address is:
c/o Corporate Real Estate
c/o Corporate Real Estate
1001 Louisiana
1001 Louisiana
Houston, TX 77002
Houston, TX 77002
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and
assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by context.
WITNESSETH, that the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which
is hereby acknowledged, has and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee
in fee simple, that certain lot or parcel of land situated in the City of Statesville, Iredell County, North
Carolina, and more particularly described as follows:
TRACT ONE - BEGINNING at a stake in the center of the Statesville-TaylorewP®-
RaiirMRKtrak (also know® as the Alexander Railroad, under lease ta^JWrfSrk
Soatbera Cor)IMai^oii, having a claimed right-of-way width
-------
EX. H to Bl Plant Site DPLUR
PIN 4734-18-6147 Tract 2
Notice of Inactive Hazardous Substance or Waste Disposal Site
(Pb* Pa»iifeen€ein a straight line across tbc railroad a ad the lands of the T. D. MiierJjgira
pabiklBgtwa$L4gaMI strip bow being a portion of Pfcaenis AjgMr-flSvtag a
right-of-way widthofiO"lfcrt)^____^ ——
This description having been agreement with the State of
North Carolina recordedj3Jtoed-Book277, page 76.
EictpMjIMUTbMt described in Deed dated! September 24, 198S/u3^tcw4aL.
iarffiaBook 721, page 173..
TRACT TWO - BEGINNING at an existing axle, the southeast corner of Lot 26 in
Wendover Hills (Subdivision) as recorded in Plat Book 5 at page 125, property of
Robert T. Bradbnra, Jr. as described in Peed Book 825 at Page 20, the southwest
corner of Lot 33 in Wendover Hills (Subdivision) as recorded in Plat Book 5 at Page
125, property of Doaaa Snther Vaughn as described in Deed Book 433 at Page 5®,
and the northeast corner of Paul L. Gilbert, Jr., et a I, as described in Deed Book 793
at Page 772, said axle being located South 33 degrees 43' 03" East 2690.46 feet from
North Carolina Geodetic Survey concrete monument "PAPER" which has
coordinates of North = 750,775.72 feet and East = 1,430,095.39 feet; thence running
with the line of Donna Snther Vanghn and Jean O. Vaaght South 85 degrees 52' 07"
East 149.13 feet to an existing iron pin in the southern line of Jean O. Vanght as
described in Deed Book 641 at page 147, said iron pin being the northwest corner of
Lot 24 in Wendover Woods (Subdivision) as recorded ia Plat Book 10 at page 134,
property of Jimmy D. Abshire as described in Deed Book 761 at Page 297; thence
running with the western line of Lots 24, 19, 18 and 13 Wendover Woods
(Subdivision), Jinny D. Abshire, Wanda A Leatz as described in Deed Book 610 at
Page 433, and Carl £. Crawford as described in Deed Book 181 at Page 263, South 02
degrees 47' 05" West 732.00 feet to an existing iron pipe, a corner of Carl L.
Crawford; thence running with the western line of Carl L. Crawford South 09
degrees 47' 56" East 167.64 feet to an existing iron pi®, the southwest corner of Carl
L. Crawford ia the northern liae of Pan! L. Gilbert, Jr. as described in Deed Book
721 at Page 176; theace running with the northern liae of Paul L. Gilbert, Jr. North
88 degrees 04' 22" West 195.68 feet to an iron pin set, the northeast corner of Paul L.
Gilbert, Jr. in the eastern line of Paul L. Gilbert, Jr., et ai (as first mentioned above);
thence rnaniag with the eastern liae of Paul L. Gilbert, Jr., et al, North 03 degrees 25'
23" East 962.10 feet to the poiat and place of BEGINNING, containing 3.250 acres,
more or less.
Grantor acquired the property hereinabove described by instrument recorded in Deed Book 1513 at page
2834-2856.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and appurtenances
thereto belonging to the Grantee in fee simple.
And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor is seized of the premises in fee simple, has the
right to convey the same in fee simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of all encumbrances, and
that Grantor will wauant and defend the title against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever, except
for the exceptions stated. Title to the property hereinabove described is subject to the following
exceptions:
ANY AND ALL OF PUBLIC RECORD
Book: 2138 Page: 1607 Page 2 of 3
K-70
-------
EX. H to Bl Plant Site DPUJR
PIN 4734-18-8147 Tract 2
Notice of Inactive Hazardous Substance or Waste Disposal Site
WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused this instrument to be signed in its corporate name by
its duly authorized officer, the day and year first above written.
GRANTOR: EL PAS
By:
Name:
Title:
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF HARRIS
1, a Notary Public, in and for the State and County aforesaid, do hereby certify that John H.
Anderson personally appeared before me and being duly sworn says that he or she is a duly authorized
agent of said above named corporation and as such has the authority to act in and for said corporation. 1
have personal knowledge of the identity of the above named authorized agent, and that he or she signed
the foregoing or annexed instrument on behalf of said corporation in the capacity so herein stated and
acknowledge the said writing to be the act and deed of said corporation herein stated.
Witness my hand and official seal or stamp, this day of August, in the year 2011.
Notary Public Official Signature
Book: 2138 Page: 1607 Page 3 of 3
K-71
-------
Ex. I to BI Plant Site DPLUR
PIN 4734-18-7068; (former PIN 4734-18-7069)
4734-18-7274; (former PIN 4734-18-7274)
4734-18-8058; (former PIN 4734-18-8059)
4734-18-8264; (former PIN 4734-18-8263)
Notice of Inactive Hazardous Substance or
Waste Disposal Site
Plat Parcels 4 H, M, I and L respectively.
Type: CRP
Recorded: 9/30/2011 11:48:26 AM
Fee Amt: $22.00 Page 1 of 2
Revenue Tax: $0.00
Iredell County, NC
Matthew J. McCall Register of Deeds
BK 2138 PG 1603-1604
NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL WARRANTY DEED
Mail after recording to: El Paso Natural Gas, Corporate Real Estate. 1001 Louisiana. 10® Floor. Houston, TX 77002
This instrument prepared by: Jay Gallia. Esquire. El Paso Energy Service Co, 1001 Louisiana, Houston, TX 77002
Brief description for the index: Lots 17, 18,19 and 20 of the Wendover Woods subdivision
r _rj
THIS DEED made this the day of August, in the year 2011, by and between
Grantor
Grantee
EL PASO REMDIATION COMPANY,
EL PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY,
a Delaware corporation,
a Delaware corporation,
Whose address is:
Whose address is:
c/o Corporate Real Estate
c/o Corporate Real Estate
1001 Louisiana
1001 Louisiana
Houston, TX 77002
Houston, TX 77002
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and
assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by context.
WITNESSETH, that the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which
is hereby acknowledged, has and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee
in fee simple, that certain lot or parcel of land situated in the City of Statesville, Iredell County, North
Carolina, and more particularly described as follows:
Being all of Lot Numbers Seventeen (17), Eighteen (18), Nineteen (19), Twenty (20)
of the Subdivision of Rath D. Gaston known as "Wendover Woods", as platted,
planned on a map thereof, by L.B. Grier, Registered Surveyor, dated May 5, 1969
and recorded in Plat Book 10, Page 34, Iredell County Registry, and to which map
reference is hereby made for a full and complete description.
RETURN RECORDED DOCUMENT TO:
Carrie Cavalier, First American Title, 24 Greenway Plaza,
Ste#850^Houston, TX 77046/Tel: (713) 346-1653
ncs# Sbaf^y:
Book: 2138 Page: 1603 Paget of 2
K-72
-------
Grantor acquired the property hereinabove described by instrument recorded in Deed Book 1751 at page
2086-2087. A map showing the above-described property is recorded in Plat Book 10 at page 34.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and appurtenances
thereto belonging to the Grantee in fee simple.
And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor is seized of the premises in fee simple, has the
right to convey the same in fee simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of all encumbrances, and
that Grantor will warrant and defend the title against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever, except
for the exceptions stated. Title to the property hereinabove described is subject to the following
exceptions:
ANY AND ALL OF PUBLIC RECORD
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused this instrument to be signed in its corporate name by
its duly authorized officer, the day and year first above written.
GRANTOR: EL PASO REMED1ATIONXOMP.
By:
Name: John H.
Title: Vice President
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF HARRIS
I, a Notary Public, in and for the State and County aforesaid, do hereby certify that John H.
Anderson personally appeared before me and being duly sworn says that he or she is a duly authorized
agent of said above named corporation and as such has the authority to act in and for said corporation. I
have personal knowledge of the identity of the above named authorized agent, and that he or she signed
the foregoing or annexed instrument on behalf of said corporation in the capacity so herein stated and
acknowledge the said writing to be the act and deed of said corporation herein stated.
Witness my hand and official seal or stamp, this..#?*^ day of August, in the year 2011.
M®e.MBoan
VeOMHtWONDtPBE
Book: 2138 Page: 1603 Page 2 of 2
K-73
-------
Type: CRP
Recorded: 9/30/2011 11:48:26 AM
Fee Ami: $22.00 Page 1 of 2
Revenue Tax: $0.00
Iredell County, NC
Matthew J. McCall Register of Deeds
BK 2138 PG 1601 -1602
NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL WARRANTY DEED
Mail after recording to: El Paso Natural Gas, Corporate Real Estate, 1001 Louisiana, 10th Fl, Houston, TX 77002
This instrument prepared by: Jay Gallia, Esquire, El Paso Energy Service Co, 1001 Louisiana, Houston, TX 77002
Brief description for the index: Lots 16 and 21 of Wendover Woods subdivision
Bou/Tw Wi/8?o¥?
THIS DEED made this the 23^ day of August, in the year 2011, by and between
Grantor
Grantee
EL PASO REMEDIATION COMPANY.
EL PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY,
a Delaware corporation,
a Delaware corporation,
Whose address is:
Whose address is:
c/o Corporate Real Estate
c/o Corporate Real Estate
1001 Louisiana
1001 Louisiana
Houston, TX 77002
Houston. TX 77002
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and
assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by context.
WITNESSETH, that the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which
is hereby acknowledged, has and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee
in fee simple, that certain lot or parcel of land situated in the City of Statesville, Iredell County, North
Carolina, and more particularly described as follows:
BEING ALL OF Lot No. Sixteen (16) of the Subdivision of Rath D. Gaston known as
"Wendover Woods" as platted and planned on a map thereof, by L.B. Grier, Registered
Surveyor, dated May 5, 1969, and recorded in Plat Book 10, at page 34, Iredell County
Registry, and to which map reference is hereby made for a fall and complete description
of said lot.
and
BEING all of Lot No. Twenty-One (21) of the Subdivision of Ruth D. Gaston, known as
"WENDOVER WOODS", as platted and planned on a map thereof by L. B. Grier,
Registered Surveyor, dated May 5, 1969, and recorded in Plat Book 10, at page 34,
Iredell County Registry, and to which map reference hereby made for a full and
complete description of said lot.
RETURN RECORDED DOCUMENT TO:
Carrie Cavafer, First American Title, 24 Greenway Plaza,
Ste# 850, Houston, TX 77046/ Tel: (713) 346-1653
ncs# SosL^sr
Ex. J to Bi Plant Site DPLUR
PiN. 4734-18-9048 (former PIN 4734-18-9049)
4734-18-9244 (former PIN 4734-18-9243)
Notice of inactive Hazardous Substance or
Waste Disposal Site
(Plat Parcels 4 J&K respectively)
Book: 2138 Page: 1601 Page 1 of 2
K-74
-------
Ex. J to Bl Plant Site DPL.UR
PIN. 4734-18-9048 (former PIN 4734-18-9049)
4734-18-9244 (former PIN 4734-18-9243)
Notice of Inactive Hazardous Substance or
Waste Disposal Site
hereinabove described by instrument recorded in Deed Book 1949 at page
113-116. A map showing the above-described property is recorded in Map Book 10 at page 34.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and appurtenances
thereto belonging to the Grantee in fee simple.
And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor is seized of the premises in fee simple, has the
right to convey the same in fee simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of all encumbrances, and
that Grantor will warrant and defend the title against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever, except
for the exceptions stated. Title to the property hereinabove described is subject to the following
exceptions:
ANY AND ALL OF PUBLIC RECORD
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused this instrument to be signed in its corporate name by
its duly authorized officer, the day and year first above written.
GRANTOR: EL PASO REMEDIATION COMPANY
By: 7T* f _j
Name: JcAimH. Anderr—
Title: Vrce President
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF HARRIS
1, a Notary Public, in and for the State and County aforesaid, do hereby certify that John H.
Anderson personally appeared before me and being duly sworn says that he or she is a duly authorized
agent of said above named corporation and as such has the authority to act in and for said corporation. I
have personal knowledge of the identity of the above named authorized agent, and that he or she signed
the foregoing or annexed instrument on behalf of said corporation in the capacity so herein stated and
acknowledge the said writing to be the act and deed of said corporation herein stated.
Witness my hand and official seal or stamp, this tff^A^dav of August, in the year 2011.
Book: 2138 Page: 1601 Page 2 of 2
K-75
-------
Ex. K PlartFSite DPLUR
Parcel ID No. 4734-27-0701
Notice of inactive Hazardous Substance or Waste Disposal Site (Plat Parcel 4 C)
111111111111111
Ir*d*J4 County, NC
jOf Deeds
*1899^115-117
Excise Tax SSSO'OO
Verified by
by:
County on the
Parcel Identifier No. 4734-27-0741
day of , .
Mail after recording to Grantee
•/This instrument was prepared by G. Patteson Williams. Scrivener Only.
Brief description for the Index
501 Phoenix Street
NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL WARRANTY DEED
THIS DEED made November 8, 2997. by and between
GRANTOR
GRANTEE
JEFFREY ALLEN MOTLEY
EL PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY,
and wife,
a Delaware corporation
CHERYL ANN MOTLEY
Tax Mailing Address:
fOOt Louisiana Street, Houston, TX 77092
Property Address:
SOI Phoenix Street, Ststesvttle, NC 2S677
Enter in ititprojuime hiock for cash stariy: imme. address, and. If appropriate, ckumcler of entity. e.g.. corporation or partnership.
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and assigns, and shall include
.singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as required by context.
WITNESSETH^ that the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
has and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee in fee simple, all that certain lot or parcel of land
situated in the City of StatesviUe, StatesviUe Inside Township, Iredell County, North Carolina and more particularly described by mete
and bounds as follows:
See Exhibit "A " attached and incorporated herein by reference.
N.C. Bar Assoc. Form No. 3 e 1977
Printed by Agreement with the N.C. Bar Assoc.
8003
K-76
-------
Ex. K tQjSI Planfc$ite DPLUR
Parcel ID No. 4734-27-0701
Notice of Inactive Hazardous Substance or Waste Disposal Site (Plat Parcel 4 C)
The property hereinabove described was acquired by Grantor by instrument recorded in Book 737, Page 725.
A map showing the above described property is recorded in Plat Book^
at Page _
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and appurtenances thereto belonging to the
Grantee in fee simple.
Ami the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor is seized of the premises in fee simple, has the right to convey the same in
fee simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of all encumbrances, and that Grantor will warrant and defend the title against
the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever except for the exceptions hereinafter staled.
Title to the property hereinabove described is subject to the following exceptions:
This conveyance is made subject to all restrictions, easements and rights-of-way, including those for utilities and public roadways and
the lien of future ad valorem taxes, which the Grantee assumes and agrees to pay.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal, or if corporate, has caused this instrument to be
signed in its corporate name by its duly authorized officers and its seal to be hereunto affixed by authority of its Board of Directors, the
day and year first above written.
® i
A. /^F
ft. (SEAL'S
Jeffrey Allen Motley aka Jeffrey A. Motley by and
through his Attorney in Fact, Cheryl A. Motley
(Ls4\-axmR (Vjs5 ^sfcfc^EAD
Cheryl Air Motley
NORTH CAROLINA, M eAc ^County.
1, a Notary Public of the County and State iforcSfid, certify that Cheryl Ann Motley, Grantor,
personally appeared before me this day and acknowledged the execution
of the foregoing instrument. Witness my hand and official stamp or seal,
this J
-------
Ex. K to« PlanFfite DPLUR
Parcel ID No. 4734-27-0701
Notice of inactive Hazardous Substance or Waste Disposal Site {Plat Parcel 4 C)
¦iiiiMinifii
'9= . "OM7480003 Tvd.: CUP
F®I I" 03:39:4a Pfl
£•• Ant: $270.00 Pan i af a
Iredell County, NC
*"d* 5; B«U Rtglittr of DMdi
*1899^115-117
Excise Tax $SS&'DD
Verified by
by:
County on the
Parcel Identifier No. 4734-27-0741
day of , .
Xil after recording to Grantee
s instrument was prepared by G. Patteson Williams. Scrivener Only.
Brief description for the Index
50t Phoenix Street
NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL WARRANTY DEED
GRANTOR
GRANTEE
JEFFREY ALLEN MOTLEY
EL PASO NATURAL OAS COMPANY,
and wife,
a Delaware corporation
CHERYL ANN MOTLEY
Tax Mailing Address:
1001 Louisiana Street, Houston, TX 77002
Property Address:
S01 Phoenix Street, StatesvUle, NC2S677
^SZJZJSZSpom: I
I. and. If appropriate, ckumcier of entity, e.g., corporation &¦ partnership.
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and assigns, and shall include
singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as required by context.
WITNESSETH, that the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
has and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee in fee simple, all that certain lot or parcel of land
situated in the City of StatesvUle, StatesvUle InsiSeTownship, Iredell County, North Carolina and more particularly described by mele
and bounds as follows:
Set Exhibit "A " attached mi incorporated herein by
N.c. Bar ASSOC- Form No. 3 ® 1977
printed by Agreement with the N.C. Bar Assoc.
*003
K-78
-------
Ex. K to Bl Plant Site DPLUR
Parcel itfNo. 4^4-27-0701
Notice of Inactive Hazardous Substance or Waste Disposal Site (Plat Parcel 4 C)
Exhibit "A"
BEING known and designated as all of that certain real property located in
Iredell County, North Carolina, legally described by metes and bounds as follows:
BEGINNING at an iron pin situated at the western margin of a
fifty (50) foot right of way easement for a paved road
designated as Phoenix Street, said iron pin being the
southeast corner of the J.J. Kinard property (see Deed Book
511 at page 56); thence with the J.J. Kinard property line North
84 deg. 15 min. 39 sec. West 150.54 feet to an iron pin;
thence continuing with the J.J. Kinard property line (see Deed
Book 651 at page 486 and Deed Book 595 at Page 12) North
89 deg. 13 min. 57 sec. West 68.23 feet to an iron pin
situated on the E.L. Crawford property line, said iron pin being
the southwest corner of the J.J. Kinard property; thence with
the E.L. Crawford property line (see Deed Book 595 at page
905) South 02 deg. 54 min. 05 sec. West 110.53 feet to an
¦ iron pin situated on the northern margin of a forty (40) foot
right of way easement for an unpaved road designated as
Yadkin Street, said iron pin being the southeast corner of the
E.L. Crawford property; thence with the Northern margin of
said easement for Yadkin Street South 86 deg. 18 min. 07
sec, East 202.20 feet to an iron pin also situated on the
Northern margin of said easement for Yadkin Street; thence
with the Northern margin of said easement for Yadkin Street
with the arc of a circular curve to the right having a radius of
15 feet and an arc distance of 23.54 feet in a northeast
direction to a point situated on the western margin of the fifty
(50) foot right of way easement for Phoenix Street; thence
continuing with the western margin of said easement for
Phoenix Street North 03 deg. 37 min. 13 sec. East 93.65 feet
to the point of BEGINNING, containing 0.555 acres, more or
less, as set forth on a physical survey map entitled "Survey for
Jeffrey Motley and wife, Cheryl Motley" prepared by Robert J.
Lackey and dated September 15,1986.
The real estate hereinabove described constitutes all of Lot 10 and a portion of
Lots 9 and 11 in Wendover Woods Subdivision as set forth on Plat Map 10 at
Page 34 in the Iredell County Register of Deeds. Being the identical property
conveyed to Grantor by Deed in Book 737, Page 725, Iredell County Public
Registry.
K-79
-------
Ex. K IqjBI Platte DPLUR
Parcel ID No. 4734-27-0701
Notice of Inactive Hazardous Substance or Waste Disposal Site (Plat Parcel 4 C)
The property hereinabove described was acquired by Grantor by instrument recorded in Book 737, Page 725.
A map showing the above described property is recorded in Plat Book _
_ at Page _
TO HA VE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and appurtenances thereto belonging to the
Grantee in fee simple.
Ami the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor is seized of the premises in fee simple, has the right to convey the same in
fee simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of all encumbrances, and that Grantor will warrant and defend the title against
the lawful claims oj all persons whomsoever except for the exceptions hereinafter stated
Title to the property hereinabove described is subject to the following exceptions:
This conveyance is made subject to all restrictions, easements and rights-of-way, including thosefor utilities and public roadways and
the Hen of future ad valorem taxes, which the Grantee assumes and agrees to pay.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal, or if corporate, has caused this instrument to be
signed in its corporate name by its duly authorized officers and its seal to be hereunto affixed by authority of its Board of Directors, the
day and year first above written. Ol ^ O-k
A- fn«sL±4^ fU-F
fV rKaxjj^ Qbv^ fVN
-------
El Paso Natural Gas
Company, L.L.C.
a Kinder Morgan company
January 29,2020
Ms. Elizabeth HartzelJ
Division of Waste Management - Superfund Section
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
1646 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1646
RE: FCX (Statesville) Superfund Site (OU3)
Required Annual Notification, Declaration of Perpetual Land Use Restrictions Recorded in Iredell County
Register of Deeds, Book 2472, Pages 1233-1252
Ms. Hartzell;
As required in Perpetual Land Use Restriction number 7 of the above referenced Declaration of Perpetual Land Use
Restrictions, El Paso Natural Gas Company, LLC is providing notice that the referenced Declaration is still recorded in
the Office of the Iredell County Register of Deeds and that activities and conditions at the property remain in compliance
with the land use restrictions described in said document.
If you have any questions regarding this notification, please contact me at (713) 420-3475,
Sincerely,
Joseph Wiley
Kinder Morgan, Inc.
CC: Ken Mallary - EPA Region 4
t
STATE OF TEXAS
Before me personally appeared
Tlo^epW Wiliu
COUNTY OF HARRIS
Who executed said instrument for the purposes therein expressed.
Witness my hand and official seal, this __day of
iKmwc Sxicuv. tw
_,20_
Notary Public (print name)
My commission expires
Notary Public Signature
BREANNA NICOLE POLK
Notary Public, State of Texas
Comm. Expires 09-14-2020
Notary 10 129123®?!
Attachment
Stamp
1001 Louisiana Street, Room 757A Houston, IX 77002
K-81
-------
Type: CONSOLIDATED REAL PROPERTY
Recorded: 2/2/2017 10:31:37 AM
Fee Amt: $46.00 Page 1 of 20
Iredell County, NC
Ronald N. Wyatt Register of Deeds
BK 2472 PG 1233-1252
DECLARATION OF PERPETUAL LAND USE RESTRICTIONS
For Property Owned By: El Paso Natural Gas Company
(now El Paso Natural Gas Company LLC)
Parcel Identification Numbers:
4734-27-2703 4734-27-2782 4734-27-2808
FCX Statesville (OU 3) Superfund Site, Iredell County, North Carolina
The real properties that are the subject of this Declaration of Perpetual Land Use
Restrictions ("Declaration") are contaminated with ''hazardous substances", as that term
is defined by the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Act, as amended ("CERCLA/SARA"), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq. It also is an INACTIVE
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE OR WASTE DISPOSAL SITE as defined by North
Carolina's Inactive Hazardous Sites Response Act of 1987, which consists of Section 130A-
310 through Section 130A-310.19 of the North Carolina General Statutes ("N.C.G.S."). The
hazardous substances originate from Operable Unit 3 (OU 3) of the FCX Statesville
Superfund Site (hereinafter referred to as the "Site"). The real properties that are the
subject of this Declaration (referred to hereafter as the "Property" or "Properties"
comprise a portion of the Site.
The Site is the subject of a Record of Decision ("ROD") issued by the United States
Environmental Protection Agency ("USEPA") in September 1996; an Explanation of Significant
Difference issued in September 2006 and a Consent Decree that was filed in civil action no.
5:97CV198-V in the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina,
entitled United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Beaunit Corporation; Burlington Industries, Inc.;
and El Paso Natural Gas Company, d/b/a El Paso Energy Corporation, Defendants. " The land
use restrictions set forth in this Declaration are included in the remedial action plan for the Site
and are identified in the ROD and amendments thereto approved by the Secretary of the North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (or its successor in function), or
his/her delegate, as authorized by N.C.G.S. Section 143B-279.9. The North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, now Department of Environmental Quality,
shall hereinafter be referred to as "DEQ."
El Paso Natural Gas Company, now El Paso Natural Gas Company LLC, ("EPNG"),
Page 1
K-82
Page County
NS PO Si
43
R.O.I.C
-------
located in Colorado Springs, Colorado, is the owner in fee simple of the Properties. The
Properties are located at various addresses on Reid and Yadkin Streets in the County of Iredell,
City of Statesville, State of North Carolina, and is the real property shown in the records of the
Office of the Register of Deeds for Iredell County at the Deed Book and Page number listed in
the Table below and legally described at the referenced Book and Page No. (copy attached at
Exhibits A-B to this Declaration):
Exhibit
No.
Current
Parcel ID No.
Former Parcel Id. No.
Deed Book /
Page
Notice of Inactive
Hazardous Substance
or Waste Disposal
Site (Plat Parcel)
A
4734-27-2703
4734-27-2703
2138/1595
Tract #2
Parcel 6
A
4734-27-2782
4734-27-2782
2138/1595
Tract #1
Parcel 7
B
4734-27-2808
4734-27-2808
2138/1605
Parcel 5
The Properties are also shown in Parcels 5,6 and 7 on a Notice of Inactive Hazardous
Substance or Waste Disposal Site constituting a survey plat that is concurrently being recorded
with this Declaration at Map Book Page 31 in the Office of the Register of Deeds for
Iredell County.
For the purpose of protecting public health and the environment, EPNG hereby declares
that all of the Properties shall be held, sold and conveyed subject to the following perpetual land
use restrictions, which shall run with the land; shall be binding on all parties having any right,
title or interest in the Properties or any part thereof, their heirs, successors and assigns; and shall,
as provided in N.C.G.S. Section 130A-310.3(f), be enforceable without regard to lack of privity
of estate or contract, lack of benefit to particular land, or lack of any property interest in
particular land. These restrictions shall continue in perpetuity and cannot be amended or
canceled unless and until the Iredell County Register of Deeds receives and records the written
concurrence of the Secretary of DEQ (or its successor in function), or his/her delegate. If any
provision of this Declaration is found to be unenforceable in any respect, the validity, legality,
and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not in any way be affected or impaired.
PERPETUAL LAND USE RESTRICTIONS
1) Groundwater shall not be used for any purpose. The installation of groundwater wells or
other devices for access to groundwater for any purpose other than activities pursuant to
the remedy are prohibited without prior approval by North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources ("DEQ"), or its successor in function.
2) No part of the Properties shall be used for mining, extraction of coal, oil, gas or any other
minerals or non-mineral substances.
3) Remediation equipment and engineering controls installed as part of the Site remedy,
including groundwater monitoring wells and engineered remedial appurtenances installed
in accordance with a Remedial Action Plan, located on any Property shall not be moved,
removed, destroyed, altered or disturbed in any way without prior approval in writing
Page 2
K-83
-------
from DEQ.
4) No building shall be constructed on any Property unless a vapor intrusion mitigation
system is installed, or in the alternative, a vapor intrusion assessment is performed in
accordance with guidelines issued by the USEPA or North Carolina, and a vapor
mitigation system is installed if required by the vapor intrusion assessment.
5) No building with a below grade structure used for human habitation, shall be constructed
on any Property.
6) No person conducting environmental assessment or remediation at the Properties, or
involved in determining compliance with applicable land use restrictions, at the direction
of, or pursuant to a permit or order issued by, DEQ or its successor in function may be
denied access to any Property for the purpose of conducting such activities.
Each person who owns a Property or any portion thereof which is the subject of this
Declarationt shall cause the instrument of any sale, lease, grant, or other transfer of any
interest in the Property to include a provision expressly requiring the lessee, grantee, or
transferee to comply with the applicable DPLUR.
7) Each person who owns a Property or any part thereof shall submit a letter report,
containing the notarized signature of the owner, in January of each year on or before
January 31st, to the Superfund Section of the Division of Waste Management of DEQ, or
its successor in function, confirming that this Declaration is still recorded in the Office of
the Iredell County Register of Deeds and that activities and conditions at the Property
remain in compliance with the land use restrictions herein.
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES REMAIN ON THE PROPERTY, BUT ARE NOT A DANGER
TO PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT, PROVIDED THAT THE ABOVE
RESTRICTIONS, AND ANY OTHER MEASURES REQUIRED BY DEQ, ARE STRICTLY
COMPLIED WITH.
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
The owner of the Properties hereby represents and warrants to the other signatories hereto:
That the owner of each of the Properties is the sole owner of each of the Properties;
That the owner of each of the Properties holds fee simple title to each Property free, clear
and unencumbered;
That the owner of the each of the Properties has the power and authority to enter into this
Declaration, to grant the rights and interests herein provided and to carry out all obligations
hereunder;
That the owner of each of the Properties has provided to DEQ the names of all other
persons that own an interest in or hold an encumbrance on each of the Properties and has notified
such persons of the owner's intention to enter into this Declaration; and
That this Declaration will not materially violate or contravene or constitute a material
default under any other agreement, document or instrument to which the owner of each of the
Page 3
K-84
-------
Properties is a party or by which the owner of each of the Properties may be bound or affected.
ENFORCEMENT
The above land use restrictions are an integral part of the remedy for the contamination at
the Site . Adherence to the restrictions is necessary to protect public health and the environment.
These land use restrictions shall be enforced by any owner, operator, or other party responsible
for any part of the Properties. The above land use restrictions may also be enforced by DEQ
through the remedies provided in N.C.G.S. Chapter 130A, Article 1, Part 2 or by means of a civil
action, and may also be enforced by any unit of local government having jurisdiction over any
part of the Properties. Any attempt to cancel this Declaration without the approval of DEQ or its
successor in function shall constitute noncompliance with the Remedial Action Plan approved by
DEQ for the Properties, and shall be subject to enforcement by DEQ to the full extent of the law.
Failure by any party required or authorized to enforce any of the above restrictions shall in no
event be deemed a waiver of the right to do so thereafter as to the same violation or as to one
occurring prior or subsequent thereto.
FUTURE SALES, LEASES. CONVEYANCES AND TRANSFERS
When any portion of the Properties is sold, leased, conveyed or transferred, pursuant to
N.C.G.S. Section 130A-310.8(e), the deed or other instrument of transfer shall contain in the
description section, in no smaller type than that used in the body of the deed or instrument, a
statement that the real property being sold, leased, conveyed, or transferred has been used as a
hazardous substance or waste disposal site and a reference by book and page to the recordation
of the Notice of Inactive Hazardous Substance or Waste Disposal Site referenced in this
Declaration.
[Intentionally left blank/Signatures next page]
Page 4
K-85
-------
OWNER SIGNATURE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I, Floyd C. Robertson, exercising power of attorney for El Paso
Natural Gas Company LLC, execute these presents on this J T^ay of JV-,
20_K
Signature:
Signatory's name:
Signatory's title:
tOBERTSON
Attorney-in-Fact
¦AJktz:
STATE OF COLORADO
COUNTY OF EL PASO
, a Notary Public, do hereby certify that
Floyd C. Robertson personally appeared before me this day, declared that he is acting on behalf
of El Paso Natural Gas Company, now El Paso Natural Gas Company LLC, and that by authority
duly given and proven by the power of attorney attached hereto, and as the act of El Paso Natural
Gas, LLC he has signed this Declaration.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this
is
My Commission expires: [O T)- f\
[SEAL]
denise m toney
NOTARY PUBLIC
STATE OF COLORADO
NOTARY ID # 2003403539O
[mycommission expires October ir, 2019
Page 5
K-86
-------
APPROVAL AND CERTIFICATION OF THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT
OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
The foregoing Declaration of Perpetual Land Use Restrictions is hereby approved and
certified.
Bateson, fccCChief
iperfund Section
Division of Waste Management
North Carolina Department of Environmental
Quality
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
WML
COUNTY OF
LZ
i. \\nf\h\HiA UiJiArf. a Notary Public, do hereby certify that
J \ yV) n personally appeared before me this day,
produced proper identification in the form of d}\'\f-C\rh U'cHT*C and signed this
Declaration.
WITNESS my hand and official seal this ^day of v. K^.0 1 7.
JytrfA UK A ^A_
' Notary Public [y
My Commission expires: J CUf\ 1 AX U 2 201^
KATrt&KSN LANCE
NOTARY PUBLIC
WAKE COUNTY, N.C.
REGISTER OF DEEDS CERTIFICATION
The foregoing Declaration of Perpetual Land Use Restrictions is certified to be duly recorded at
the date and time, and the Book and Page, shown on the first page hereof.
Register of Deeds for Iredell County
By:
Name and Title
Page 6
K-87
-------
EASTERN AMD WESTERN PIPELINES GROUP
SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY
STATE OF TEXAS §
S KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
COUNTY OF HARRIS §
Effective as of January 1, 2013, Joseph Listengart, as Vice President of each of the entities listed on
Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (each, a "Company" and collectively,
the "Companies"), does hereby designate, constitute and appoint each of the employees of Kinder
Morgan, Inc. and its affiliates listed on Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference
(each, an "Authorized Employee") to execute and deliver from time to time in the name of and for and
on behalf of any Company as its Attorney-in-Fact without corporate seal and without attestation:
1. Rights of way, easements, franchises, licenses, permits, privileges, agreements or similar
rights, for right of way purposes, over and through any lands owned, occupied or
administered by city, county, state, federal or tribal agencies or authorities or by individuals,
partnerships, institutions, organizations, companies, corporations, trusts, estates or other
entities (including the obtaining or modification of zoning, land use or similar ordinances
affecting any such lands); provided that the present value of the minimum payments to be
made by the Company pursuant to such right of way, agreement or other right does not
exceed $200,000;
2. Leases, subleases, licenses and other rights of access to, use or occupancy of, or ingress or
egress upon, lands owned, occupied or administered by city, county, state, federal or tribal
agencies or authorities or by individuals, partnerships, institutions, organizations,
companies, corporations, trusts, estates or other entities (including the obtaining or
modification of zoning, land use or similar ordinances affecting any such lands); provided
that the present value of the minimum payments to be made by the Company pursuant to
such lease or other right does not exceed $200,000;
3. Amendments and modifications of any of the foregoing; provided that (i) such amendment
or modification is entered into without relinquishment of any Company's rights thereunder
and (ii) the present value of the minimum payments to be made by the Company pursuant
to such right of way, lease, agreement or other right being amended or modified does not,
after giving effect to such amendment or modification, exceed $200,000;
4. Settlements of landowner property damage claims arising out of construction, operation,
maintenance or retirement of the Company's facilities; provided that the present value of
the payments to be made by the Company pursuant to such settlement does not exceed
$100,000; and provided, further, that the limited settlement authority granted hereby does
not include the authority to settle any matter that is in litigation, regardless of the amount
of the claim.
K-88
-------
5. Any and all applications (including stipulations, affidavits, certificates and other pertinent
documents) for, acceptances and acknowledgements of, agreements, documents and
instruments evidencing any of the foregoing.
Not by way of limitation, but by way of confirmation, the powers and authority hereby
conferred shall extend to and include any and all of the instruments for a Company and/or acts above
described which may cover or pertain to lands of the United States of America, or to be acquired by the
United States of America, lands of any State or Tribal or Allotted Indian Lands.
Nothing herein contained shall be construed to revoke or amend, or otherwise to limit or affect
the powers and authority granted under any other power of attorney executed by or on behalf of a
Company, except that each and every power of attorney granted prior to the execution of this power of
attorney to any Authorized Employee concerning the subject matter listed herein is hereby revoked
effective as of the date first set forth above.
Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, if any Authorized Employee in any way
exceeds his or her authority and power specified in this Special Power of Attorney, then the Company
shall not be bound by the representations of such Attorney-in-Fact, nor does the Company waive any
defenses which may be available to it to contest, negate or disaffirm the actions of such Attorney-in-
Fact.
The Companies hereby ratify and confirm any and all lawful actions taken by the Attorneys since
January 1, 2013 by virtue of this Special Power of Attorney, to the extent within the scope of authority
granted hereby.
The authority granted to an Authorized Employee hereby shall continue in full force and effect
until the earliest to occur of: (i) December 31, 2014, (ii) the time at which such Authorized Employee's
employment with Kinder Morgan, Inc. and its affiliates is terminated, and (iii) such time as the relevant
Company ceases to be an affiliate of, or a company managed or operated by an affiliate of, Kinder
Morgan, Inc., Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. or El Paso Pipeline Partners, L.P.
Executed in Houston, Texas as of this jjiJOmpany.
K-89
-------
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF HARRIS
This instrument was signed before me on March
of each Company identified in this instrument.
gfe3,
by Joseph Listengart, Vice President
Given under my hand and seal of office this day and year aforesaid.
©tortoltewtow
Nosar* FiM*.
State of Tmas
^5^ Co*nm E*p. S1°HS*S3
My Commission Expires
; /?j blf jpiii 5
Aajl V? g ^
•Notary Public in and for the State of Texa?V
K-90
-------
EXHIBIT A
WESTERN PIPELINE GROUP COMPANIES
1. Bear Creek Storage Company, L.L.C.
a Lousiana limited liability company
2. Calnev Pipe Line LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
3. Camino Real Gathering Company, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability company
4. Central Florida Pipeline LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
5. Cheyenne Plains Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability company
6. CIG Gas Storage Company
a Delaware limited liability company
7. Colorado Interstate Gas Company, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability company
8. Cypress Interstate Pipeline LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
9. Eagle Ford Crossover LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
10. El Paso Midstream Investment Company, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability company
11. El Paso Midstream Group LLC
a Delaware limited liability
12. El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability company
13. Elba Express Company, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability company
14. Elba Liquefaction Company, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability company
K-91
-------
15. Gulf LNG Energy, LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
16. Gulf LNG Pipeline, LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
17. Horizon Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability company
18. Kinder Morgan Border Pipeline LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
19. Kinder Morgan Cochin LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
20. Kinder Morgan Crossover LLC
a Delaware liability company
BY: Kinder Morgan Operating L.P. "A"
a Delaware limited partnership and its managing member
21. Kinder Morgan Crude & Condensate LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
22. Kinder Morgan Eagle Ford LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
23. Kinder Morgan Freedom Pipeline LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
24. Kinder Morgan Illinois Pipeline LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
25. Kinder Morgan Liquids Terminals LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
26. Kinder Morgan Louisiana Pipeline LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
27. Kinder Morgan North Texas Pipeline LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
28. Kinder Morgan NatGas Operator LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
K-92
-------
29. Kinder Morgan Petcoke, LP.
a Delaware limited partnership
BY: Kinder Morgan Petcoke GP LLC,
its general partner
a Delaware limited liability company
30. Kinder Morgan Pecos Valley LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
31. Kinder Morgan Southeast Terminals LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
32. Kinder Morgan Tank Storage Terminals LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
33. Kinder Morgan Tejas Pipeline LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
34. Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
35. Kinder Morgan Utica LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
36. KinderHawk Field Services LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
37. Midcontinent Express Pipeline LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
38. Mojave Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability Company
39. Mojave Pipeline Operating Company, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability Company
40. Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
41. Parkway Pipeline LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
42. Plantation Pipe Line Company
a Delaware limited liability company
43. Ruby Pipeline, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability company
K-93
-------
44. Southern LNG Company, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability company
45. Sierrita Gas Pipeline LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
46. Southern Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability company
47. SFPP, LP.
a Delaware limited partnership
By Kinder Morgan Operating L.P. "D"
Its General Partner
By Kinder Morgan G.P., Inc.
Its General Partner
By Kinder Morgan Management, LLC
The Delegate of the General Partner
48. Tejas Gas, LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
49. Tejas Natural Gas, LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
50. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability company
51. TransColorado Gas Transmission Company LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
52. WYCO Development LLC
a Colorado limited liability company
BY: Colorado Interstate Gas Company, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability and its member
53. Wyoming Interstate Company, L.L.C.
a Delaware limited liability company
K-94
-------
54. Young Gas Storage, Ltd.
a Colorado limited partnership
BY: CIG Gas Storage Company
a Delaware corporation and its sole General Partner
K-95
-------
EXHIBIT B
AUTHORIZED EMPLOYEES
Daniel G. Gredvig
Floyd C. Robertson
K-96
-------
EXHIBITS A-B
Legal Descriptions of Properties Subject to Declaration
Page 7
K-97
-------
Ex. A to DPLUR for EPNG Parcels 6 & 7
PIN 4734-27-2703 (Tract #2)
PIN 4734-27-2782 (Tract #1)
Notice of Inactive Hazardous Substance or Waste Disposal Site (Plat Parcels 6 & &7respectivety)
Type: CRP
Recorded: 9/30/2011 11:48:26 AM
Fee Ami: $22.00 Page 1 of 2
Revenue Tax: $0.00
Iredell County, NC
Matthew J. McCall Register of Deeds
BK 2138 PG 1595-1596
NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL WARRANTY DEED
Mail after recording to: & Pane >l»tuial Oa», CmpuiaU. Rial Cuali, 1001 Louijiana, lOtli fir, Ilmman, TX 77002
This instrument prepared by: Jay Gallia, Esquire, El Paso Energy Service Co, 1001 Louisiana, Houston, TX 77002
Brief description for the index: Lot 10 of Weudover Woods
£*<**.7^ -wc© 4*34*7 a-7 H-v34a-ia-?o3
THIS DEED made this the 2"^ day of August, in the year 2011, by and between
Grantor
Grantee
EL PASO MEMDIATION COMPANY,
EL PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY,
a Delaware corporation,
a Delaware corporation,
Whose address is:
Whose address is:
do Corporate Real Estate
do Corporate Real Estate
1001 Louisiana
1001 Louisiana
Houston, TX 77002
Houston, TX 77002
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and
assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by context.
WITNESSETH, that the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which
is hereby acknowledged, has and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee
in fee simple, that certain lot or parcel of land situated in the City of Statesville, Iredell County, North
Carolina, and more particularly described as follows:
TRACT ONE: BEING all of Lot No. Twenty-Nine (29) of the DIAMOND HILL
COAL COMPANY PROPERTY, as the same is plat ted, planned anil recorded in
PUt Book 5, Page 75, of Plat Records for Iredell County, North Carolina.
TRACT TWO: BEING all of Lot No. Twenty-Eight (28) of the DIAMOND HILL
COAX. COMPANY PROPERTY, as the same is platted, plained and recorded in
Plat Book 5, Page 75, of Plat Records for Iredell County, North Carolina.
Carria Ca^ater, rint Amancan TiMa, 34 Graanway PtaiT
omiww t*.i.l.i ry miniT.i (T«i)
NCS*
After recording/return to:
First American Title Insurance Co.
Christopher J. Albee, Esquire
201 § College Street, Suite 1440
Charlotte, NC 2
File No. Si>i
Book: 2138 Page: 1595 Page 1 of 2
K-98
-------
Ex. A to DPLUR for EPNG Parcels 6 & 7
PIN 4734-27-2703 (Tract #2)
PIN 4734-27-2782 (Tract #1)
Notice of inactive Hazardous Substance or Waste Disposal Site (PEet Parcels 6 & &7respectivety)
Grantor acquired the property hereinabove described by instrument recorded in Deed Book 2038 at page
1049-1050. A map showing the above-described properly is recorded in Plat Book 5 at page 75.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and appurtenances
thereto belonging to the Grantee in fee simple.
And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor is seized of the premises in fee simple, has the
right to convey the same in fee simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of all encumbrances, and
that Grantor will warrant and defend the title against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever, except
for the exceptions stated. Title to the property hereinabove described is subject to the following
exceptions:
ANY AND ALL OF PUBLIC RECORD
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused this instrument to be signed in its corporate name by
its duly authorized officer, the day and year first above written.
GRANTOR:
ON COMPANY
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF HARRIS
I, a Notary Public, in and for the State and County aforesaid, do hereby certify that John H.
Anderson personally appeared before me and being duly sworn says that he or she is a duly authorized
agent of said above named corporation and as such has the authority to act in and for said corporation. I
have personal knowledge of the identity of the above named authorized agent, and that he or she signed
the foregoing or annexed instrument on behalf of said corporation in the capacity so herein stated and
acknowledge the said writing to be the act and deed of said corporation herein stated.
Witness my hand and official seal or stamp, this day of August, in the year 2011.
MCH&MBmn
common owes
Book: 2138 Page: 1595 Page 2 of 2
K-99
-------
Ex. B to DPLUR for EPNG Parcel 5-7
PIN 4734-27-2808
Notice of Inactive Hazardous Substance or Waste Disposal Site (Plat Parcel 5) Type: CRP
Recorded: 9/30/2011 11:48:26 AM
Fee Amt: $22.00 Page 1 of 2
Revenue Tax: $0.00
Iredell County, NC
Matthew J. McCall Register of Deeds
BK 2138 PG 1605-1606
NORTH CAROLINA GENERAL WARRANTY DEED
Mail after recording to: El Paso Natural Gas, Corporate Real Estate, 1001 Louisiana, 10* Floor, Houston, TX 77002
This instrument prepared by: Jay Gallia, Esquire, El Paso Energy Service Co, 1001 Louisiana, Houston, TX 77002
Brief description for the index: Lot 27, Block E, of The Diamond Hill Coal Company
T«v T>*ID 2/fXSog
THIS DEED made this the 73^ day of August, in the year 2011, by and between
Grantor
Grantee
EL PASO CORPORATION,
EL PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY,
a Delaware corporation,
a Delaware corporation,
Whose address is:
Whose address is:
c/o Corporate Real Estate
c/o Corporate Real Estate
1001 Louisiana
1001 Louisiana
Houston, TX 77002
Houston, TX 77002
The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors, and
assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine, or neuter as required by context.
WITNESSETH, that the Grantor, for a valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt of which
is hereby acknowledged, has and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee
in fee simple, that certain lot or parcel of land situated in the City of Statesville, Iredell County, North
Carolina, and more particularly described as follows:
BEING all of Lot Number Twenty-Seven (27) in Block "E" of The Diamond Hill
Coal Company as shown on a plat thereof in Plat Book 5, page 75, of the Plat
records of the Register of Deeds for Iredell County, North Carolina
RETURN RECORDED DOCUMENT TO:
Carrie Cavalier, First American Title, 24 Greenway Plaza,
Ste# 850. Houston, TX 7704$/Tel: (713) 346-1663
Book: 2138 Page: 1605 Paget of 2
K-100
-------
Ex. B to DPLUR for EPNG Parcel 5-7
PIN 4734-27-2808
Notice of Inactive Hazardous Substance or Waste Disposal Site (Plat Parcel 5)
Grantor acquired the property hereinabove described by instrument recorded in Deed Book 1964 at page
1-3. A map showing the above-described property is recorded in Map Book 5 at page 75.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the aforesaid lot or parcel of land and all privileges and appurtenances
thereto belonging to the Grantee in fee simple.
And the Grantor covenants with the Grantee, that Grantor is seized of the premises in fee simple, has the
right to convey the same in fee simple, that title is marketable and free and clear of all encumbrances, and
that Grantor will warrant and defend the title against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever, except
for the exceptions stated. Title to the property hereinabove described is subject to the following
exceptions:
AMY AND ALL OF PUBLIC RECORD
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused this instrument to be signed in its corporate name by
its duly authorized officer, the day and year first above written.
GRANTOR: EL PASO CORPOH
JN
By:
Name: John fl/Atvderson
Title: Vii
-*TV|
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF HARMS
1, a Notary Public, in and for the State and County aforesaid, do hereby certify that John H.
Anderson personally appeared before me and being duly sworn says that he or she is a duly authorized
agent of said above named corporation and as such has the authority to act in and for said corporation. I
have personal knowledge of the identity of the above named authorized agent, and that he or she signed
the foregoing or annexed instrument on behalf of said corporation in the capacity so herein stated and
acknowledge the said writing to be the act and deed of said corporation herein stated.
Witness my hand and official seal or stamp, this day of August, in the year 2011
WOMliMSIONBIPKS
~
Book: 2138 Page: 1605 Page 2 of 2
K-101
------- |