Quivira Mines
Coyote Canyon, Pinedale, and Standing Rock
Chapters, Navajo Nation, New Mexico
Final
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis
March 2024
It
TETRA TECH
-------
Quivira Mines
Coyote Canyon, Pinedale, and Standing Rock
Chapters, Navajo Nation, New Mexico
Final
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis
Response, Assessment, and Evaluation Services 2
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002
Task Order 001
March 2024
Submitted to
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Submitted by
Tetra Tech, Inc.
1999 Harrison Street, Suite 500
Oakland, CA 94612
It
TETRA TECH
-------
"Ik
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines __
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page
ACRONYMS AM) ABBREVIATIONS vi
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
1.1 PURPOSE OF THE ENGINEERING EVALUATION/COST
ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS 1
1.2 SITE CHARACTERIZATION 1
1.3 REMOVAL ACTION OBJECTIVES 3
1.4 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES 3
1.5 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES 4
2.0 SITE CHARACTERIZATION 6
2.1 SITE DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND 6
2.1.1 Site Location 6
2.1.2 Type of Mine and Operational Status 7
2.1.3 Regulatory Hi story 13
2.1.4 Site Features and Landscape 14
2.1.5 Geology, Hydrogeology, and Hydrology 15
2.1.6 Land Use and Populations 17
2.1.7 Sensitive Ecosystems 18
2.1.8 Meteorology and Climate 20
2.2 PREVIOUS RECLAMATION AND REMOVAL ACTIONS 21
2.3 PREVIOUS SITE INVESTIGATIONS 22
2.4 SOURCE, NATURE, AND EXTENT OF CONTAMINATION 23
2.4.1 Background Threshold Values 23
2.4.2 Source and Nature of Contamination 25
2.4.3 Extent of Contamination 27
2.5 RISK ASSESSMENT 32
2.5.1 Purpose 32
2.5.2 Exposure Units 32
2.5.3 Human Health Risk Assessment 33
2.5.4 Ecological Risk Assessment 36
2.5.5 Risk Assessment Results Summary 37
2.6 RISK MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS 38
2.6.1 Comparison of Site Concentrations of Candidate Contaminants of
Concern and Contaminants of Ecological Concern to Background
Concentrations 40
2.6.2 Consideration of Natural Forms of Chromium 42
2.6.3 Preliminary Removal Goals for Human Health and Ecological Health 43
2.6.4 Co-Location Assessment 44
2.6.5 Refinement of the Ecological Risk Assessment Candidate Contaminants
of Ecological Concern 46
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
i
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
2.6.6 Risk Management Summary and Conclusions 49
2.7 REMOVAL ACTION EXTENT 50
2.7.1 Numerical Removal Action Goals 50
2.7.2 Other Removal Action Extent Considerations 51
3.0 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION OBJECTIVES 53
3.1 REMOVAL ACTION OBJECTIVES 53
3.2 STATUTORY LIMITS ON REMOVAL ACTIONS 53
3.3 REMOVAL SCOPE 54
3.4 REMOVAL SCHEDULE 54
4.0 IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES ...55
4.1 DEVELOPMENT AND SCREENING OF ALTERNATIVES 55
4.1.1 Summary of Technology Identification and Screening 55
4.1.2 Summary of Alternative Development 61
4.1.3 Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements 64
4.2 DESCRIPTION 01 ALTERNATIVES 66
4.2.1 Common Elements 66
4.2.2 Description of Removal Action Alternatives 73
4.3 DETAILED ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES 77
4.3.1 Effectiveness Criterion 78
4.3.2 Implementability Criterion 79
4.3.3 Cost Criterion 79
4.3.4 Cost Estimating Process 79
4.3.5 Alternative 1: No Action 80
4.3.6 Alternative 2: Consolidate and Cap All Waste On Site 82
4.3.7 Alternative 3: Dispose of All Mine Waste Off Site at Red Rocks
Disposal Facility 86
4.3.8 Alternative 4: Dispose of All Mine Waste Off Site at a Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act C or Low-Level Radioactive Waste
Facility 91
5.0 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES 97
5.1 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS APPROACH 97
5.2 SUMMARY OF COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS 97
5.2.1 Effectiveness 97
5.2.2 Implementability 102
5.2.3 Projected Costs 105
6.0 RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVE 107
7.0 REFERENCES 109
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001 ii
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
EXHIBITS
Exhibit 1. Summary of Alternative Ratings 4
Exhibit 2. Chapter Populations in 2019 18
Exhibit 3. Precipitation Frequency Estimates 21
Exhibit 4. Background Threshold Values 25
Exhibit 5. Quivira Mines Receptors 34
Exhibit 6. Cancer Risks and Noncancer Hazards 1
Exhibit 7. Candidate COCs Identified Based on Cancer Risks and Noncancer Hazards 1
Exhibit 8. Site-Wide Candidate COECs 37
Exhibit 9. Candidate COCs and Candidate COECs Recommended for Further Evaluation 37
Exhibit 10. Background Comparison Results Summary 41
Exhibit 11. Human Health Preliminary Removal Goals and NAUM Preliminary Ecological
Removal Goals for Candidate COC and COECs in Soil Above Background 44
Exhibit 12. Radium-226 Removal Action Goal Development 45
Exhibit 13. Comparison of Site-Wide EPCs to NAUM PERGs for Soil 48
Exhibit 14. COCs Recommended for Removal Action 49
Exhibit 15. Selected RAG for Each COC 51
Exhibit 16. Alternative 2 Cost Breakdown 86
Exhibit 17. Red Rocks Transportation and Tipping Costs 87
Exhibit 18. Alternative 3 Cost Breakdown 91
Exhibit 19. Disposal Facility Transportation and Tipping Costs 92
Exhibit 20. Alternative 4 Cost Breakdown 96
Exhibit 21. Comparative Rating of Alternatives 97
Exhibit 22. Potential Community and Worker Impacts 99
Exhibit 23. Environmental Impacts of Alternatives 100
Exhibit 24. Construction Completion Time for Alternatives 101
Exhibit 25. Alternative Costs and Ratings 105
PHOTOS
Photo 1. CR-1 Waste Rock Pile (Looking West) 9
Photo 2. CR-1 Headframe and Industrial Buildings (Looking North) 10
Photo 3. CR-1 Settling Ponds (Looking Northeast) 10
Photo 4. CR-1 Settling Ponds (Looking Southeast) 11
Photo 5. CR-1E Settling Pond 11
Photo 6. CR-1E Headframe and Industrial Buildings (Looking Northeast) 12
Photo 7. Proto Ore Stockpile at the Kerr-McGee Pond Area (Looking East) 12
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
FIGURES
Figure 1. Quivira Mines Location
Figure 2. Quivira CR-1 Mine Site Features
Figure 3. Quivira CR-1E Mine Site Features
Figure 4. Kerr-McGee Ponds Site Features
Figure 5. Local Geology and Background Study Areas
Figure 6. Local Soils and Background Study Areas
Figure 7. Conceptual Drawing of Historic Releases and Water Flow
Figure 8. Land Use Designations
Figure 9. Monthly Average Temperature, Precipitation, and Evaporation
Figure 10. Gallup, New Mexico Wind Rose Diagram
Figure 11. Prior Removal Action Locations
Figure 12. Quivira Mines Transport Model
Figure 13. Quivira Mines Conceptual Site Model Wire Diagram
Figure 14. 2022 CR-1 Transect Gamma Scan Measurements
Figure 15. 2022 CR-1E Transect Gamma Scan Measurements
Figure 16. 2022 Kerr-McGee Ponds Transect Gamma Scan Measurements
Figure 17. CR-1 Correlated and Laboratory Ra-226 Results in Surface Soils
Figure 18. CR-1E Correlated and Laboratory Ra-226 Results in Surface Soils
Figure 19. Kerr-McGee Ponds Correlated and Laboratory Ra-226 Results in Surface Soils
Figure 20. CR-1 Distribution of Ra-226 in Surface and Subsurface Soils
Figure 21. CR-1 Waste Pile Vertical Extent of Ra-226 at Depths Greater Than 6 Feet Below
Grade
Figure 22. CR-1E Distribution of Ra-226 in Surface and Subsurface Soils
Figure 23. CR-1E Vertical Extent of Ra-226 at Depths Greater Than 6 Feet Below Grade
Figure 24. Kerr-McGee Ponds Distribution of Ra-226 above 2.0 pCi/g in Surface and Subsurface
Soils
Figure 25. Kerr-McGee Ponds Distribution of Ra-226 above 5.4 pCi/g in Surface and Subsurface
Soils
Figure 26. Kerr-McGee Ponds Vertical Extent of Ra-226 at Depths Greater Than 6 Feet
Figure 27. Graphic Depiction of Navajo Residential Exposure Pathways including the Dine
Lifeways
Figure 28. CR-1 Surface and Subsurface Removal Action Extent
Figure 29. CR-1E Surface and Subsurface Removal Action Extent
Figure 30. Kerr-McGee Ponds Surface and Subsurface Removal Action Extent
Figure 31. Proposed Laydown Area, Access Roads, and Exclusion Areas
Figure 32. Alternative 2 Waste Excavation, Transfer, and Onsite Consolidation
Figure 33. Alternative 2 Waste Capping and Site Restoration
Figure 34. Alternative 2 Typical Waste Consolidation Area Features
Figure 35. Alternatives 3 and 4 Waste Excavation and Offsite Disposal
Figure 36. Alternatives 3 and 4 Site Restoration
Figure 37. Alternative 3 Haul Routes from Quivira Mines to Red Rocks Disposal Facility
Figure 38. Alternative 3 Offsite Disposal at Proposed Red Rocks Disposal Facility
Figure 39. Alternative 4 Haul Route from Quivira Mines to Deer Trail, Colorado, Disposal
Facility
Figure 40. Alternative 4 Haul Route from Quivira Mines to Andrews, Texas, Disposal Facility
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
iv
-------
"Ik
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines __
TABLES
Table 1. Mine Features and Dimensions for Quivira Mines
Table 2. Comparison of Quivira Mines Surface Soil with Bartlett Barren Member of Crevasse
Canyon Formation (BSA-2) Background Surface Soil
Table 3. Risk Management Summary
Table 4. Quivira Mines Selection of Soil Removal Action Goal for Each COC and COEC
Table 5. General Response Actions, Technologies, and Process Options
Table 6. Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements and to Be Considered
Requirements for Quivira Mines
APPENDICES
Appendix A. Quivira Mines Site Images
Appendix B. Contaminant Distribution
Appendix C. Risk Assessment
Appendix D. Environmental Metrics Analysis
Appendix E. Cost Analysis
Appendix F. Post-Removal Visualizations
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
v
-------
"Ik
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATION
J
Section
Degree Fahrenheit
ARAR
AUM
Applicable or relevant and appropriate requirement
Abandoned uranium mine
bgs
BIA
BSA
BTV
Below ground surface
Bureau of Indian Affairs
Background study area
Background threshold value
CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CChe Carbon dioxide equivalent
COC Contaminant of concern
COEC Contaminant of ecological concern
COPC Contaminant of potential concern
COPEC Contaminant of potential ecological concern
CR-1 Quivira Church Rock No. 1 Mine
CR-1E Quivira Church Rock No. 1 East Mine
CR-2 Quivira Church Rock No. 2 Mine
CRA Conestoga Rovers and Associates Ltd.
CSM Conceptual site model
EE/CA Engineering evaluation/cost analysis
EPC Exposure point concentration
ERA Ecological risk assessment
ERRG Engineering/Remediation Resources Group, Inc.
ESA Endangered Species Act
ET Evapotranspiration
EU Exposure unit
FOD Frequency of detection
g/cm3 Gram per cubic centimeter
gpm Gallon per minute
HDPE High-density polyethylene
HELP Hydrologic Evaluation of Landfill Performance
HHRA Human health risk assessment
HI Hazard index
HQ Hazard quotient
IC Institutional control
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
vi
-------
"Ik
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS (CONTINUE
J
Kerr-McGee Kerr-McGee Corporation
LLRW Low-level radioactive waste
MWH
Montgomery Watson Harza
NAMLRD
Navajo Nation Abandoned Mine Lands Reclamation Department
NAUM
Navajo abandoned uranium mine
NCP
National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan
NECR
Northeast Church Rock
NESL
Navajo Endangered Species List
NNDFW
Navajo Nation Department of Fish and Wildlife
NNDWR
Navajo Nation Department of Water Resources
NNEPA
Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency
NNMD
Navajo Nation Minerals Department
NORM
Naturally occurring radioactive material
NRC
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
NTUA
Navajo Tribal Utility Authority
OSHA
Occupational Safety and Health Administration
OSWER
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
pCi/g
Picocurie per gram
PERG
Preliminary ecological removal goal
PRG
Preliminary removal goal
psf
Pound per square foot
Quivira Mines
Quivira Mines Site
Ra-226
Radium-226
RAG
Removal action goal
RAO
Removal action objective
RBSL
Risk-based screening level
RCRA
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
RME
Reasonable maximum exposure
RSE
Removal site evaluation
SE
Secular equilibrium
SENES
SENES Consultants Limited
SLERA
Screening-level ecological risk assessment
SPLP
Synthetic precipitation leaching procedure
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
vii
-------
"Ik
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS (CONTINUE
I
J
TBC
TCLP
TCRA
TENORM
Tetra Tech
To be considered
Toxicity characteristic leaching procedure
Time-critical removal action
Technologically enhanced naturally occurring radioactive material
Tetra Tech, Inc.
U-234 Uranium-23 4
U-238 Uranium-23 8
UNC United Nuclear Corporation
US ACE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
USEPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
UTL95-95 95 percent upper tolerance limit with 95 percent coverage
WCS Waste Control Specialists
Weston Weston Solutions, Inc.
WRS Wilcoxon rank sum
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
viii
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMAR
L
J
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) prepared this engineering evaluation/cost
analysis (EE/CA) report regarding the Quivira Mines Site (Quivira Mines) near Gallup, New
Mexico, in the Navajo Nation.
1.1 PURPOSE OF THE ENGINEERING EVALUATION/COST ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
The purpose of this EE/CA is to evaluate cleanup alternatives to address human and ecological
health risks at the Quivira Mines. These cleanup alternatives are developed and evaluated in the
context of the Navajo Nation Fundamental Laws and in accordance with the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). In this report, the
Quivira Mines comprises the Quivira Church Rock No. 1 Mine (CR-1), Quivira Church Rock
No. 1 East Mine (CR-1E), and Kerr-McGee Corporation (Kerr-McGee) Ponds (Figure 1).
1.2 SITE CHARACTERIZATION
CR-1 and CR-1E were leased for underground mining operations between approximately 1972
and 1986. A third leased location, the Quivira Church Rock No. 2 Mine (CR-2), is about 3 miles
northwest of CR-1, but CR-2 was never developed and an investigation found no evidence of
environmental impacts from mining at this location (Weston Solutions, Inc. [Weston] 2015). A
fourth leased location, the Kerr-McGee Ponds, received sediment from settling ponds at CR-1
and CR-1E, where the sediment was dewatered; proto ore was also stored in a stockpile at this
location. CR-1 and CR-1E are on Navajo Nation lands, and the Kerr-McGee Ponds are on
private lands. The Quivira Mines are approximately 20 miles northeast of Gallup, New Mexico
(Figure 1). Access to the area is via New Mexico State Road 566. The Coyote Canyon, Standing
Rock, and Pinedale Chapters of the Navajo Nation intersect nearby. Active mining included
sinking shafts and excavating underground workings at CR-1 and CR-1E and extracting ore from
1,500 to 1,850 feet below ground surface (bgs). CR-1 and CR-1E were reclaimed in 1985 to
1986 by backfilling 14-foot and 12 foot diameter shafts with proto ore and sealing with a steel
and concrete plug, backfilling vent holes with waste rock and sealing with a steel and concrete
plug, removing mine equipment and buildings, removing sediment from the settling ponds, and
grading and covering the waste piles with 6 to 12 inches of material (Quivira Mining Company
1987). The Kerr-McGee Ponds were reclaimed in 1980 to 1982 by removing the pond berms and
former proto ore stockpile (Weston 2019a).
Except for remnants of former mine operations and reclamation, the Quivira Mines are currently
undeveloped although livestock grazing occasionally occurs where perimeter fencing is
compromised. Land use on the Navajo Nation is mainly low-density, single-family residential
and open grazing with some gathering of traditional plants and herbs. Several residences are
within 700 feet of CR-1 and 800 feet of CR-1E. Other land use activities on the Navajo Nation
may include hiking, wood gathering, and hunting. Land use at the Kerr-McGee Ponds is
industrial and open space and is limited by private ownership by the United Nuclear Corporation
(UNC). Continuation of current land uses is expected for the foreseeable future. Nearby
residents, UNC outdoor workers, and open space users could be exposed to contaminants at the
Quivira Mines via incidental ingestion of soil, external radiation from contaminants, and
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
1
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
inhalation of dust. Residents could also be exposed to contaminants through livestock or wildlife
meat and plant consumption. The likely future land uses at the Quivira Mines are:
• Kee'da'whii teeh (full-time Navajo resident) - Areas are easy to access and relatively
flat except where waste rock piles are present.
• Kqq ei doo nahaazah dah (difficult access open space user) - Areas are difficult to
get to because the land is steep. This land use also includes arroyos that are difficult to
get to because of challenging features such as steep sidewalls.
• UNC Outdoor Worker (non-Navajo lands) - Privately-owned areas with former
mine-related operations.
The nature and extent of contamination at the Quivira Mines were assessed with various
technologies during the removal site evaluation (RSE) completed in September 2011 (SENES
2011). An assessment of the Kerr-McGee Ponds was conducted in 2017 (Weston 2019a). Data
gap investigations were conducted in 2015 and 2022 (Tetra Tech 2023b). Most of the waste at
the site is from excavated waste rock and occurs as reclaimed waste piles and settling and
dewatering pond areas. Areas with contamination outside the waste rock piles and ponds are
from mining-related activities.
As part of this EE/CA, risk assessments at the site were conducted to evaluate the potential risk
posed to human and ecological health by mine-related contamination. The results of the human
health risk assessment (HHRA) and ecological risk assessment (ERA) are used to help in
removal action decisions at the Quivira Mines through the EE/CA process. The purpose of the
risk assessment is to evaluate current and future human health risk under reasonable maximum
exposure (RME) scenarios and ecological risk based on the known ecosystems for the region.
The results of the HHRA and ERA indicate that risks are present at the Quivira Mines for
human and ecological receptors. At the site, radium-226 (Ra-226) and uranium are the
human health risk contaminants of concern (COC); and Ra-226, uranium-234 (U-234), and
uranium-238 (U-238) are contaminants of ecological concern (COEC). A removal action is
recommended for contamination associated with COCs and COECs at the Quivira Mines.
Human health and ecological removal action goals (RAG) were derived for COCs and COECs.
The RAG is the lesser of the human health preliminary remediation goal (PRG) or preliminary
ecological removal goal (PERG). When one or both PRGs or PERGs are less than the
background threshold value (BTV), the BTV becomes the RAG. For purposes of the final
EE/CA, the BTV is used to represent background for delineating contaminated areas.
Multiple lines of evidence were used to develop the removal action extent at the Quivira Mines,
including the extent of Ra-226 in surface soil and sediment, extent of contamination of other
COCs and COECs not co-located with Ra-226, surface and subsurface waste areas, transport
pathways, potential disturbed mineralized areas, potential accessibility considerations, and risk
management considerations. The removal action extent covers an estimated 63 acres at the
Quivira Mines. An estimated 1,005,500 bank cubic yards of mine waste and contaminated
soil will be addressed by removal action.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
2
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
1.3 REMOVAL ACTION OBJECTIVES
The removal action objectives (RAO) of this soil removal action are to:
• Prevent exposure to soil with contaminants from mining activities that would pose an
unacceptable risk to human health with the reasonably anticipated future land use and
traditional Navajo lifeways
• Prevent exposure to soil with contaminants from mining activities that would pose an
unacceptable risk to plants, animals, and other ecological receptors
• Prevent offsite migration of contaminants from mining activities that would pose an
unacceptable risk to human or ecologic health by soil, surface water, groundwater, or air
Options to be analyzed include response actions that would allow for unrestricted residential and
Dine Lifeways use, as well as response actions that would include land use restrictions limiting
residential use and grazing on portions of the site on the Navajo Nation. Options to be analyzed
on UNC property include response actions that would allow for unrestricted use by outdoor
workers. The intent of the response action is to address the surface and subsurface contaminated
soils and waste rock at the Quivira Mines. These RAOs have been developed to be considerate of
Dine Lifeways.
1.4 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
The following removal action alternatives were considered as part of this EE/CA. Each
alternative was evaluated against the criteria of effectiveness, implementability, and cost.
• Alternative l:No Action (this must always be evaluated to provide a baseline for
comparison) - No treatment or removal action would occur at the site. In this case, all
threats would remain unchanged. Mine waste and contaminated soils would continue to
threaten human and ecological receptors. Gamma radiation and physical hazards would
still be present.
• Alternative 2: Consolidate and Cap All Waste On Site - Addresses RAOs by
excavating waste rock piles, residual waste rock, and contaminated soils; hauling the
waste to a common onsite location; consolidating the waste in a repository; and capping
the repository. An evapotranspiration (ET) cap would be used that is protective and
would limit contaminant migration. The repository would be inspected and maintained
in perpetuity. Land use restrictions would exist on the repository.
• Alternative 3: Dispose of All Mine Waste Off Site at Red Rocks Disposal Facility -
Address RAOs by excavating waste rock piles, residual waste rock, and contaminated
soils and hauling the waste to and disposing of the waste off site at the Red Rocks
disposal facility near Thoreau, New Mexico. Off-Navajo Nation disposal is protective
and would not require long-term onsite maintenance or land use restrictions.
• Alternative 4: Dispose of All Mine Waste Off Site at a Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA) C or Low-Level Radioactive Waste (LLRW) Facility -
Addresses RAOs by excavating waste rock piles, residual waste rock, and contaminated
soils and hauling and disposing of the waste at an offsite RCRA C and State of Colorado
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
3
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
radiological licensed facility, such as the Clean Harbors Deer Trail facility in Deer Trail,
Colorado, or an LLRW facility licensed by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC), such as the Waste Control Specialists (WCS) in Andrews, Texas. Off-Navajo
Nation disposal is protective and would not require long-term onsite maintenance or land
use restrictions.
For the applicable removal action alternatives, plant life that matches the natural landscape will
be planted on restored excavation areas and covers. All temporary roads built for construction
will also be removed, and the site will be restored. The consolidation and capping of waste will
address geomorphic recontouring and revegetation of land to match the natural landscape. For
Alternative 3, an evaluation of rail and truck haul routes is provided in Section 4.1.2 and in Tetra
Tech (2024).
1.5 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF REMOVAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
The removal action alternatives were evaluated individually and in relation to each other using
three broad criteria: effectiveness, implementability, and cost. Exhibit 1 presents an overview of
the comparative analysis results.
Exhibit 1. Summary of Alternative Ratings
Alternative
Attainment
of Threshold
Criteria3
Effectiveness
Implementability
Cost Rating
(Million)b
1
No Action
Fail
Short-Term: Average
Long-Term: Very Poor
Tech: Very Good
Admin: Very Good
Very Good
($0)
2
Consolidate and Cap
All Waste On Site
Pass
Short-Term: Average
Long-Term: Good
Tech: Good
Admin: Good
Good
($61.6)
3
Dispose of All Mine
Waste Off Site at
Red Rocks Disposal
Facility
Pass
Short-Term: Average
Long-Term: Very Good
Tech: Very Good
Admin: Average
Poor
($182.5)
4
Dispose of All Mine
Waste Off Site at a
RCRA C or LLRW
Facility
Pass
Short-Term: Very Poor
Long-Term: Very Good
Tech: Very Good
Admin: Good
Very Poor
($563)
Notes:
a Threshold criteria are (a) overall protection and (b) compliance with applicable or relevant and appropriate
requirements.
b Estimated costs are net present value.
Admin Administrative feasibility
LLRW Low-level radioactive waste
RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Tech Technical feasibility
The recommended alternative for the Quivira Mines is Alternative 3 (dispose of all mine waste
off site at Red Rocks disposal facility). While the alternative is twice the price of Alternative 2
(consolidate and cap at the Quivira Mines), it removes the waste from the Red Water Pond Road
and Pipeline Canyon Road communities and consolidates the waste at a dedicated facility
capable of long-term management of the waste.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
4
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
Though USEPA has identified a recommended alternative, USEPA will solicit input from
Navajo Nation officials, regulators, chapter representatives, other stakeholders, and the
community on the final EE/CA and recommended alternative during a public comment period.
USEPA and the Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency (NNEPA) will hold a public
meeting during the comment period to listen to input.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
5
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
2.0 SITE CHARACTERIZATIO
J
This section presents the site description and background; previous reclamation and removal
actions; previous site investigations; source, nature, and extent of contamination; and risk
assessment of the Quivira Mines.
2.1 SITE DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
The Quivira Mines comprises the CR-1 mine, the CR-1E mine, and the Kerr-McGee Ponds. CR-
1 and CR-1E contain waste rock piles, pond areas, and mining debris while the Kerr-McGee
Ponds does not contain any mining residuals at the surface. CR-2, located about 3 miles
northwest of CR-1, was never developed and does not require cleanup.
The following subsections describe the site location, type of mines and operational status,
regulatory history, site features and landscape, geology and hydrology, land use and populations,
sensitive ecosystems, and meteorology and climate. Appendix A contains site images that show
the current condition of the Quivira Mines.
2.1.1 Site Location
The Quivira Mines is within the Eastern Abandoned Uranium Mine (AUM) Region of the
Navajo Nation approximately 20 miles northeast of Gallup, New Mexico (Figure 1). The site is
located within the Red Water Pond Road and Pipeline Canyon Road communities in the Coyote
Canyon and Standing Rock Chapters of the Navajo Nation. The Church Rock Chapter is also
located to the southwest of CR-1. Sections of land owned by Bureau of Land Management are
located west of CR-1 within the Church Rock Chapter and south of CR-1 near the UNC Mill
Facility. The UNC Mill Facility is on private property within the Pinedale Chapter (Figure 1).
The site is accessed via State Road 566.
According to the "Red Water Pond Road and Pipeline Canyon Road Residents' Resolution"
(Red Water Pond Road and Pipeline Canyon Residents 2006), more than 50 Navajo families live
in the Red Water Pond Road area of the Coyote Canyon Chapter and the Pipeline Canyon Road
area of the Standing Rock Chapter. Nearest residences are approximately 700 feet south of CR-1,
800 feet northeast of CR-1E, and 3,000 feet northwest of the Kerr-McGee Ponds. No public or
commercial buildings are within 0.5 mile of the Quivira Mines. Current surrounding land use
includes residential and agricultural grazing (for livestock such as sheep, cattle, and horses).
Navajo families may collect piny on nuts, herbs, and plants from the surrounding area for food,
medicinal, and ceremonial purposes.
The geographic coordinates at the center of CR-1 are 35.665448° north latitude and 108.500970°
west. CR-1 is located along Red Water Pond Road north of State Road 566 (Figure 2). The mine
surface disturbance encompasses about 42 acres with 147 acres of underground workings
extending toward CR-1E (Weston 2010).
The geographic coordinates at the center of CR-1E are 35.66597° north latitude, and
108.489614° west longitude (Figure 3). CR-1E is located east of and along Indian Route 7049
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
6
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
(Pipeline Canyon Road) approximately 0.5 mile east of CR-1. The mine surface disturbance
encompasses about 10.5 acres with 97 acres of underground workings extending toward CR-1.
In early 2017, USEPA became aware that Kerr-McGee had operated sediment drying ponds and
a proto ore storage area on UNC land previously leased from the State of New Mexico. This
area, referred to as the Kerr-McGee Ponds, is approximately 2,000 feet south of CR-1E with
geographic coordinates of 35.658767° north latitude, and 108.491410° west longitude (Figure 4).
In addition, an office building and training facility had been located nearby to the south.
Preliminary assessment work during summer 2017 indicated the presence of elevated gamma
activity in surface soils at the Kerr-McGee Ponds (Weston 2019a).
Two additional sites are located near the Quivira Mines and are being addressed under separate
actions by UNC (Figure 1):
• Northeast Church Rock (NECR) Mine approximately 0.5 mile southwest of CR-1
• UNC Mill Facility approximately 1 mile south of CR-1
USEPA also assessed five vent holes (VH-1 through VH-5) associated with the Quivira Mines
(Weston 2016, 2019b) (Figure 1):
• VH-1 is located approximately 0.5 mile west-southwest of CR-1 with geographic
coordinates of 35.662375° north latitude and 108.513108° west longitude for the center
of the vent hole. A single-family residence is located approximately 620 feet northeast of
the VH-1 vent hole.
• VH-2 is located approximately 5,000 feet west-southwest of CR-1 with geographic
coordinates of 35.661423° north latitude and 108.520014° west longitude. A
single-family residence is located approximately 750 feet from the VH-2 vent hole.
• VH-3 is located approximately 3,500 feet east of CR-1E with geographic coordinates of
35.664606° north latitude and 108.477477° west longitude. VH-3 is within an 8-acre,
fenced-in area 0.35 mile west of an active sheep farm and residence comprising
two houses and several smaller structures. Additionally, a residence is located 0.25 mile
north of the VH3 fenced-in area.
• VH-4 is located approximately 1,500 feet east of CR-1 on a topographic ridge with
geographic coordinates of 35.66559° north latitude and 108.4948° west longitude. The
nearest residence is approximately 2,300 feet northeast of VH-4.
• VH-5 is located approximately 2,000 feet east of CR-1E with geographic coordinates of
35.6651° north latitude and 108.4822° west longitude. VH-5 is 0.3 mile west of the
nearest residence.
2.1.2 Type of Mine and Operational Status
The surface estate of the Quivira Mines is owned by the United States in trust for the Navajo
Nation and is part of the Navajo Nation Reservation (SENES Consultants Limited [SENES]
2010). An estimated 5,760 acres of land was leased for mining from the Bureau of Indian
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
7
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
Affairs (BIA) as owner of the mineral estate under the Navajo Tribal Uranium Leases 14-0-
0603-9987 (CR-1) and 14-20-0603-9988 (CR-1E). Kerr-McGee conducted exploration of the
CR-1 and CR-1E leases in the late 1960s (SENES 2010). Kerr-McGee and then its subsidiary,
Kerr-McGee Nuclear, which later changed its name to the Quivira Mining Corporation, began
development of the mines in 1974 and produced ore from 1974 until 1986 at CR-1 and from
1976 until 1985 at CR-1E. Kerr-McGee also operated sediment dewatering ponds and a proto ore
storage area on land leased from the State of New Mexico approximately 2,000 feet south of
CR-1E. The Quivira Mining Corporation surrendered the leased properties in February 1987,
and the company was sold to the predecessor company of Rio Algom Mining LLC in 1988
(SENES 2011).
The Quivira Mines were large underground uranium mines in the Westwater Canyon Member of
the Morrison Formation 1,500 to 1,850 feet below ground. The CR-1 shaft was 14 feet in
diameter and 1,850 deep while the CR-1E shaft was 12 feet in diameter and 1,650 feet deep. The
mines were wet and required ongoing dewatering during operations. Water pumped from the
mine working was discharged to settling ponds before discharge to Unnamed Arroyo #2 and the
Pipeline Canyon Arroyo. The CR-1 underground workings covered 147 acres while the CR-1E
underground workings covered 97 acres (Weston 2010). The mines were ventilated via five
ventholes at the surface. Uranium ore was hoisted 1,850 and 1,650 feet to the ground surface at
CR-1 and CR-1E via shafts, respectively.
Atomic Energy Commission records indicate production of 3,139,784 pounds of uranium from
ore mined at CR-1 and 1,447,463 pounds of uranium from ore mined at CR-1E (Weston 2010).
Ore contained on average 0.266 percent (2,660 milligrams per kilogram) uranium. An estimated
1.3 million tons of ore from CR-1 and CR-1E was shipped to and processed at the Quivira
Mining Corporation's Ambrosia Lake Mill, approximately 50 miles to the east and north of
Grants, New Mexico.
Aboveground operations at CR-1 covered 42 acres and included a former industrial area, a waste
rock area, and a former pond area (Figure 2). CR-1 is dominated by a single large waste rock pile
with a 30- to 50-foot elevation difference between the top and toe of the slope (Photo 1). A
number of surface structures existed during the operating years, including a shaft collar and head
frame (Photo 2), ventilation raises, and ore stockpile area; office, hoist house, maintenance
shops, and warehousing complex; mobile equipment repair shop; fuel and oil storage facilities;
main electrical transformer and switch gear; explosive storage area; and internal roads and water
drainage to divert water from the waste areas and rock storage areas (SENES 2010). The former
pond area contained seven ponds (Photo 3 and Photo 4).
Aboveground operations at CR-1E covered 10.5 acres and included a waste rock area, a former
pond area (Photo 5), and former industrial areas (Figure 3). Two small soil-covered waste rock
stockpiles, with a 7- to 10-foot elevation difference between the top and toe of the slope, are
located in the north-central portion of CR-1E. A number of surface structures existed during the
operating years, including a shaft collar and head frame (Photo 6), ventilation raises, hoist house
and maintenance shops, and fuel and oil storage facilities (SENES 2010).
Following cessation of operations at CR-1 and CR-1E in 1985 or 1986, the shafts were backfilled
with proto ore and sealed with a steel and concrete plug, vent holes were backfilled with waste
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
8
-------
"It
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
rock and sealed with a steel and concrete plug, sediment ponds were scraped and filled, and
wastes were consolidated at one location at each lease area. The wastes (mainly waste rock and
low-grade ore with less than 0.10 percent uranium) were capped with 6 to 12 inches of fill
material. Erosion and a general lack of maintenance have degraded the CR-1 cap. At CR-1, the
wastes are in stockpiles as high as 50 feet above the original grade with steep slopes along the
margins. Estimated volume of the CR-1 waste pile, industrial area, and former sedi ment ponds
is 929,200 bank cubic yards. Wastes at CR-1E are below the surrounding land grade (rather
than in an above grade pile), and erosion is not significant. Estimated volume of waste at
CR-1E including the waste rock, former pond, and industrial and step-out areas is 49,300 bank
cubic yards.
The Kerr-McGee Ponds covered an area of 9 acres and included four sediment dewatering ponds
and a proto ore storage area (Photo 7) on UNC land previously leased from the State of New
Mexico (Figure 4). Pond sediment and proto ore were received from CR-1 and CR-1E. The
various work areas were reportedly closed and the proto ore and pond berms removed during
reclamation and place at CR-1, when the State of New Mexico transferred the land at the mill to
UNC. Preliminary assessment work during summer 2017 indicated the presence of elevated
gamma activity in surface soils (Weston 2019a). Approximately 27,000 bank cubic yards of
contaminated soil remains at the Kerr-McGee Ponds area.
Photo 1. CR-1 Waste Rock Pile (Looking West)
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
9
-------
"It
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
Photo 2. CR-1 Headframe and Industrial Buildings (Looking North)
Photo 3. CR-1 Settling Ponds (Looking Northeast)
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
10
-------
Photo 4. CR-1 Settling Ponds (Looking Southeast)
Photo 5. CR-1E Settling Pond
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
11
-------
Photo 6. CR-1E Headframe and Industrial Buildings (Looking Northeast)
Photo 7. Proto Ore Stockpile at the Kerr-McGee Pond Area (Looking East)
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
12
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
The five vent holes (VH-1 through VH-5) associated with the Quivira Mines have elevated
gamma activity in surface soils and elevated concentrations of Ra-226 in surface and shallow
subsurface soil (Weston 2016). In 2015 and 2016, USEPA assessed the vent holes and found that
all five vent holes had elevated gamma activity in surface soils and detections of Ra-226 in
surface and shallow subsurface soil above the site-specific 2-picocuries-per-gram (pCi/g) action
level for Ra-226. Based on the relatively uniform grain size, color, volume, and distribution,
most vent hole wastes are likely drilling muds that were used to lubricate the drill string during
vent hole installation operations.
In summer and fall 2017, USEPA conducted removal operations at five vent holes (Weston
2019b). Approximately 10,300 bank cubic yards of soil was excavated from the areas
surrounding the vent holes and placed on top of the CR-1 waste rock pile. Residual contaminants
remain immediately adjacent to the concrete vent shaft caps. Because of the interception of
bedrock, not all contaminated material with Ra-226 concentrations above the action level was
excavated from VH-2, VH-3, and VH-5.
2.1.3 Regulatory History
The Quivira Mines were operated by Kerr-McGee and then its subsidiary, Kerr-McGee Nuclear,
which later changed its name to the Quivira Mining Corporation. Kerr-McGee began
development of the Quivira Mines in 1974 and performed mining operations from approximately
1976 to 1985. Rio Algom Mining LLC purchased the mine lease in 1988. The Quivira Mine
Corporation merged with Rio Algom Mining LLC in October 2001. Rio Algom Mining LLC is
now an indirect subsidiary of the mining conglomerate BHP Billiton.
This Quivira Mines removal action is being completed under CERCLA and the National Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP). In November 2014, the U.S. District
Court for the Southern District of New York approved a settlement agreement to resolve
fraudulent conveyance claims against Kerr-McGee and related subsidiaries of Anadarko
Petroleum Corporation {In re Tronox Inc., No. 09-10156 (Bankruptcy, Southern District of New
York, Nov. 23, 2010)). Included in the Tronox settlement were $90 million in funds for the
assessment and remediation of the Quivira Mines.
Multiple investigations of the Quivira Mines completed from 2008 through 2022 are summarized
in Section 2.3. Reclamation activities at the Quivira Mines were completed between 1980 to
1986; and multiple removal actions were completed between 2010 and 2017 and are summarized
in Section 2.2.
The nearby NECR Mine operated at approximately the same time as the Quivira Mines, and its
ore was processed at the nearby UNC Mill Facility. USEPA Region 9 signed an action
memorandum (USEPA 2011) selecting placement and capping of the approximately 1 million
bank cubic yards of waste at the UNC Mill Facility.
The nearby UNC Mill Facility is a closed uranium mill with tailings ponds formerly operated
by and currently owned by UNC, a subsidiary of the General Electric Company. The UNC
Mill Facility is a National Priorities List or Superfund site, EPA ID #NMD030443303, with
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
13
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
two operable units—Ground Water Operable Unit 1 and Surface Soil Operable Unit 2
(USEPA 2015).
2.1.4 Site Features and Landscape
All mine workings at the Quivira Mines were established underground, and no mineralized rock
is present at the surface. All mine features are aboveground and include shafts, adits, waste piles,
mine debris, industrial areas, proto ore stockpile areas, access roads, and former ponds (Figure 2
through Figure 4). Reclamation of the shafts, adits, industrial areas, waste rock piles, and settling
ponds occurred in 1986 and 1987 as specified in the abandonment and reclamation plan
submitted by the Quivira Mining Company (1987).
CR-1 is located along Red Water Pond Road on the north side of an unnamed arroyo at the base
of a mesa. CR-1 was reclaimed following the closeout of operations in 1986, and the mine lease
area includes a former industrial area, waste rock area, former settling pond area, and reclaimed
14-foot-diameter shaft and adit (Figure 2). The former industrial area at CR-1 is defined as the
area where industrial buildings and ancillary structures were formerly located. During operating
years, surface structures included a shaft collar and head frame, ventilation raises, and ore
stockpile area; an office building, a hoist house, maintenance shops, and a warehousing complex;
mobile equipment repair shop; fuel and oil storage facilities; main electrical transformer and
switch gear; explosive storage area; and internal roads and drainage channels to divert water
from the waste and rock storage areas. The buildings were razed at the closeout of operations in
1986, and the area has been graded (SENES 2010). A waste rock pile is located on the western
and southern portion of CR-1 adjacent to Unnamed Arroyo #2 to the south and Red Water Pond
Road on the west (Figure 2). The waste rock pile has a 30- to 45-foot face, which is mostly
sloped 3H: IV. Most waste rock material within the stockpile is a fine to medium sand with little
to no coarse sand or gravel.
CR-1E is located on a terrace immediately northwest of Pipeline Canyon Road and Pipeline
Canyon Arroyo adjacent to a mesa. CR-1E includes a former industrial area, a waste rock pile
area, two adits, a 12-foot-diameter shaft, a former settling pond area, and surrounding areas with
contaminated soil (Figure 3). The former industrial area at CR-1E is defined as the area where
industrial buildings and ancillary structures were formerly located. The former structures at
CR-1E were similar to those at CR-1 but smaller in scale. The buildings were razed at the
closeout of operations, and most of the area appears to have been covered with soil and rock
(SENES 2010). Two small soil-covered waste rock stockpiles slightly above grade in height are
in the north-central portion of the lease area. Most of the waste rock material within the stockpile
is a fine to medium sand with little to no coarse sand or gravel. The small former pond area has
been defined according to depictions on historical aerial photographs of a settling pond
constructed for and used in mining operations.
The Kerr-McGee Ponds are within a flat fenced area on an alluvial terrace in Pipeline Canyon
0.5 mile south of CR-1E and southeast of Pipeline Canyon Road and Pipeline Canyon Arroyo
(Figure 4). This area contains former ponds used to dewater pond sediment from former mining
operations at CR-1 and CR-1E. The former Quivira Mines uranium mining operations used
three, and later four, overflow ponds at the Kerr-McGee Ponds. Dried sediment was then stored
in a proto ore stockpile immediately east of the dewatering ponds.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
14
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
2.1.5 Geology, Hydrogeology, and Hydrology
The following subsections describe the geology, hydrogeology, and hydrology of the
Quivira Mines.
2.1.5.1 Geology
Surface geology (Figure 5) differs in each area of the Quivira Mines:
• CR-1 surface geology consists of the Dalton and Bartlett Barren Members of the
Crevasse Canyon Formation on the northern hillslopes and Quaternary alluvium on the
southern slopes.
• CR-1E surface geology consists of the Dalton Sandstone Member of the Crevasse
Canyon Formation on the northern hillslopes and the Mulatto Tongue of Mancos Shale
and Quaternary alluvium on the mine terrace.
• The Kerr-McGee Ponds is on fluvially deposited Quaternary alluvium that overlies the
Mulatto Tongue of Mancos Shale, which is expressed on south-adjacent hillslopes.
No mineralization occurs in the surface geologies; however, areas of elevated activity are present
north of CR-1. Soil types throughout the Quivira Mines are shown on Figure 6.
CR-1 and CR-1E lie in the Church Rock Mining District of the Grants Uranium Belt within the
San Juan Geologic Basin. The primary ore-bearing unit in the Grants Uranium Belt and Church
Rock Mining District is the Morrison Formation (Brister and Hoffman 2002). Three members of
the Morrison Formation are listed below in stratigraphic order (oldest to youngest):
• Recapture Member consists of grayish-red siltstone and claystone.
• Westwater Canyon Member consists principally of medium- to coarse-grained arkosic
sandstones interbedded with mudstone units of variable thicknesses.
• Brushy Basin Member consists of mudstone formed from volcanic ash falls.
At CR-1 and CR-1E, the uranium ore was mined primarily from the Westwater Canyon Member
approximately 1,800 feet below grade. Uranium mineralization within the Westwater Canyon
Member occurs as both tabular and roll-type deposits.
After deposition of the Morrison Formation during the late Jurassic period, no sediments were
preserved in the San Juan Basin until the late Cretaceous period, including the Dakota Sandstone,
Mancos Shale, and Gallup Sandstone. The Mancos Shale is a regional groundwater-confining
unit. The Gallup Formation occurs as the Lower Gallup Sandstone and the Upper Gallup
Sandstone and contains the first (uppermost) local bedrock groundwater. The Upper Cretaceous
Crevasse Canyon Formation is within the Mesa Verde Group and overlies and interfingers with
the Gallup Sandstone. The Upper Cretaceous Crevasse Canyon Formation (including Dalton
Sandstone and Bartlett Barren Members) comprises silty shale, laminated siltstone, sandstone
with a clay matrix, coal, shaly siltstone, and silty sandstone. All geologic units below the Quivira
Mines dip to the northeast. Alluvium overlies the sedimentary bedrock. A stratigraphic profile of
these units is shown on Figure 7.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
15
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
2.1.5.2 Hydrogeology
The main water-bearing strata below the Quivira Mines, from shallowest to deepest, are the
alluvial deposits, Upper Gallup Sandstone, Lower Gallup Sandstone, Dakota Sandstone, and
Westwater Canyon Member (Figure 7). Because of the northeast dip of the rock units, each of
these strata outcrops along the Pipeline Canyon Arroyo to the far southwest of the area. Aquifer
recharge occurs along the arroyos primarily as rainfall infiltrates the shallow subsurface into the
alluvial groundwater that moves southwesterly, following the same slope as the ground surface
contours. Alluvial groundwater is transmitted to the underlying water-bearing strata at contacts
between the strata and alluvium. Groundwater in the water-bearing strata generally flows
northeast, following the regional dip of the bedrock strata. With the cessation of mining and deep
aquifer dewatering, the local arroyos are no longer a major recharge source to the aquifers. A
potentiometric surface map of the Upper Gallup Sandstone in the area shows a northeast flow
direction following the regional dip (USEPA 2010a).
The main uranium-bearing rock unit (Morrison Formation) includes the water-bearing Westwater
Canyon Member. Depth to groundwater in the Westwater Canyon Member is 1,500 to 1,850 feet
bgs. No shaft construction records are available pertaining to the Quivira Mines other than shaft
diameters and total depths; however, such records are available regarding the nearby NECR
Mine. According to the drilling log for one nearby NECR Mine shaft constructed in 1968 and
1969, the first encounter with groundwater occurred at approximately 400 feet bgs in the lower
portion of the Upper Gallup Sandstone (Montgomery Watson Harza [MWH] 2003). Inflow of
water from this formation amounted to 30 to 50 gallons per minute (gpm). The mine shaft
drilling logs indicate no encounter with groundwater again until the Dakota Sandstone at the base
of the Mancos Shale. Groundwater inflows from the Dakota Sandstone were 800 gpm, and
inflows from the Westwater Canyon Member were 1,500 to 2,000 gpm (MWH 2003). The
Westwater Canyon Member was dewatered during mining operations, but water levels have been
recovering since the cessation of mining. A regional cone of depression from mine dewatering
will likely result in multiple decades of groundwater recovery. The local communities rely on
municipal water provided by the Navajo Tribal Utility Authority (NTUA) with only limited local
groundwater use for livestock watering.
2.1.5.3 Hydrology
Most precipitation at the Quivira Mines occurs from July to October as monsoon thunderstorms.
The annual evaporation rate is nearly five times the precipitation rate; consequently, most
streams in the area are ephemeral or have flowing water only during storms or rapid snowmelt.
The dry conditions and high-intensity rains cause quick saturation of the surface soils, preventing
precipitation from penetrating deeper. As a result, intense rainfall drives surface flow into
canyon washes, generating short-term and fast-moving streams. These streams produce arroyos
that cut through the sedimentary bedrock in the canyons and erode sediments that are transported
downstream to be deposited as alluvium. The alluvium in the canyons and on valley floors
consists of fine-grained sand with interbedded silty clay layers. The alluvium directly overlies
sedimentary bedrock and aids in the transfer of surface water through the shallow groundwater
zone in the alluvium to the deeper sedimentary bedrock aquifers (Figure 7).
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
16
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
A series of arroyos exist throughout the Quivira Mines and surrounding area. CR-1 is physically
separated from the NECR Mine and the residences on Red Water Pond Road to the south by
Unnamed Arroyo #2 that runs along the southern boundary of CR-1 (Figure 2). Unnamed
Arroyo #2 drains approximately 4,700 acres upstream of the confluence with Pipeline Canyon
Arroyo. The width of Unnamed Arroyo #2 typically ranges from 15 to 35 feet with sidewalls
10 to 15 feet high. Abutting the southern side of CR-1, the arroyo drains from west to east and
flattens out to a floodplain near its junction with the Pipeline Canyon Arroyo, south of CR-1.
The Pipeline Canyon Arroyo is immediately southeast of CR-1E (Figure 3) and drains
approximately 6,700 acres upstream of the confluence with Unnamed Arroyo #2. The width of
the Pipeline Canyon Arroyo typically ranges from 15 to 25 feet with sidewalls 10 to 25 feet high.
This arroyo drains from northeast to southwest and flattens out to a floodplain near its junction
with Unnamed Arroyo #2, south of CR-1. A small tributary arroyo also drains an area north of
the Kerr-McGee Ponds.
A large quantity of mine water (2,500 to 5,000 gpm) was extracted from the Westwater Canyon
Member to allow access to ore during mining operations at the NECR Mine and Quivira Mines
and to process ore at the UNC Mill Facility (Engineering/Remediation Resources Group, Inc.
[ERRG] 2011). An estimated 93 billion gallons of water was pumped from the mine workings
and for process water during mine and milling operations (ERRG 2011). Extracted groundwater
was discharged via a series of ponds to surface water in Unnamed Arroyo #2 and the Pipeline
Canyon Arroyo. Similar dewatering activities at the NECR Mine contributed a large flow to
Unnamed Arroyo #2 during mining operations. The surface water, in turn, recharged the
groundwater in alluvium and the Upper and Lower Gallup Formations along the Pipeline Canyon
Arroyo near the UNC Mill Facility to the southwest of the Quivira Mines.
2.1.6 Land Use and Populations
More than 50 Navajo families live in the Red Water Pond Road area of the Coyote Canyon
Chapter and the Pipeline Canyon Road area of the Standing Rock Chapter (Red Water Pond
Road Community Association and Southwest Research and Information Center 2012). Figure 8
shows approximate locations of the Red Water Pond Road community area and the Pipeline
Canyon Road community area. The nearest residences are approximately 700 feet south of CR-1
and 800 feet north of CR-1E. No public or commercial buildings are within 0.5 mile of the
Quivira Mines.
The nearest urban populations are concentrated in Gallup and Church Rock. Gallup is
approximately 20 miles from the Quivira Mines and had an estimated population of 21,899 in
2020 (U.S. Census Bureau 2021). Church Rock is approximately 12 miles from the Quivira
Mines and had an estimated population of 1,100 in 2019 (U.S. Census Bureau 2019). Exhibit 2
shows the Navajo population and the non-Navajo population for Coyote Canyon, Pinedale, and
Standing Rock chapters and other nearby chapters as determined by the 2019 U.S. census
(Navajo Nation Division of Community Development 2019).
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
17
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
Exhibit 2. Chapter Populations in 2019
Chapter
Navajo Population
Non-Navajo Population
Total
Church Rock
2,596
87
2,683
Coyote Canyon
726
43
769
Pinedale
1,217
14
1,231
Standing Rock
522
1
523
Note:
Chapter populations are from the 2019 U.S. census (Navajo Nation 2019).
The Quivira Mines is a former industrial site that is currently used by wildlife and livestock
where perimeter fencing is compromised. Current surrounding land uses include agricultural
grazing (for livestock such as sheep, cattle, and horses), residential, and industrial (UNC
property). Navajo families may collect piny on nuts, herbs, and plants from the surrounding area
for food, medicinal, and ceremonial purposes (USEPA 2009a). The following potential future
land uses were identified at the Quivira Mines (Figure 8); these land uses are further described in
Section 2.5.3 by pairing users of the land, otherwise known as receptors, with land areas
as follows:
• Kee'da'whii teeh (full-time Navajo resident) - Areas that are easily accessible and
relatively flat.
• Kqq ei doo nahaazah dah (difficult access open space user) - Areas that are difficult to
access because of deeply incised arroyos.
• UNC outdoor worker - Areas of the former Kerr-McGee Ponds and arroyos on
privately-owned land with industrial land use.
Additionally, a water line easement runs through the CR-1 pond area and crosses Unnamed
Arroyo #2. The water line is scheduled to be rerouted. Marathon Petroleum has a 35-foot-wide
easement for petroleum pipelines located along the southeast margin of CR-1E and adjacent to
the Pipeline Canyon Road. The pipeline easement cannot be disturbed during removal activities
without detailed consultation with Marathon Petroleum and other utilities using the easement.
2.1.7 Sensitive Ecosystems
SENES (2011) completed a vegetation survey in 2011 as part of the RSE report for the Quivira
Mines. The survey identified good plant diversity with a mixture of native shrubs, grasses, and
forbs although cover values varied based on grazing pressure. Tetra Tech (2022a, 2023a)
performed rare plant surveys in 2022 and 2023 to assess the potential for investigation activities
to affect Endangered Species Act (ESA)-listed species, critical habitats, and Navajo Nation
Department of Fish and Wildlife (NNDFW)-listed sensitive species.
The habitat in the Quivira Mines area consists of upland communities of intermountain basins
semi-desert grassland, intermountain basins greasewood flat, intermountain basins semi-desert
shrub steppe, and Colorado Plateau pinyon-juniper woodlands and is bordered by Colorado
plateau mixed bedrock canyon and tableland. The 2022 field survey identified the dominant
species throughout the project footprint as sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata ssp. tridentata),
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
18
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
globemallow (Sphaeralcea ambigua), rabbitbrush (Ericameria nauseosa), filaree storksbill
(Erodium cicutarium), cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum), Indian ricegrass (Achnatherum
hymenoides), needle and thread grass (Hesperostipa comata), greasewood (Sarcobatus
vermiculatus), two-needle pinyon (Pinus edulis), and Utah juniper (,Juniperus osteosperma). No
plant species of management interest or rare plant species were observed during the 2022 survey.
Dominant plant species identified during the 2023 field survey included all plant species
identified during the 2022 field surveys, as well as Palmer's penstemon (Penstemon pal men),
Douglas' milk-vetch (,Astragalus douglassii), yellow sweet clover (Melilotus officinalis), desert
prince's plume (Stanleyapinnata), ground plum {Astragalus crassicarpus), fragrant evening
primrose (iOenothera cespitosa), spiny star (Escobaria vivipara), whole leaf paintbrush
{Castilleja Integra), and hoary tansy aster (Dieteria canescens). Other plants species observed to
a lesser extent included Gambel oak (Quercus gambelii), Russian olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia),
alfalfa (Medicago saliva), Stansbury's cliffrose (Purshia stansburyana), alder leaf mountain
mahogany (Cercocarpus montanus), rose heath (Chaetopappa ericoides), woolly locoweed
(Astragalus mollisssimus), fineleaf woolly-white (Hymenopappus filifolius), and toad flax
penstemon (Penstemon linarioides). Significant habitat for Naturita milk-vetch (Astragalus
naturitensis) was found within the action area during the 2023 survey; Naturita milk-vetch is a
Navajo Endangered Species List (NESL) sensitive species. Follow-up surveys are proposed in
2024 before construction activities to refine exclusion zones and mitigation measures.
Tetra Tech (2022a) performed a nesting bird survey in 2022 for the Quivira Mines area to assess
the potential for investigation and construction activities to affect ESA-listed species, critical
habitats, migratory birds protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, and NNDFW-listed
sensitive species. All suitable nesting areas were surveyed during the field survey, and no active
raptor species nests were identified. However, one common raven (Corvus corax) nest was
located between CR-1 and CR-1E. Avian and wildlife species observed at the Quivira Mines
were the common raven, house finch (Haemorphous mexicanus), rock wren (,Salpinctes
obsoletus), Gunnison prairie dog (Cynomys gunnisoni), western fence lizard {Sceloporus
occidentalis), and bullsnake (Pituophis catenifer sayi).
Tetra Tech (2023a) performed another nesting bird survey in 2023 for the Quivira Mines and
Kerr-McGee Ponds. Burrowing owls (Athene cunicularia) and a great horned owl (Bubo
virginianus) nest were identified within the survey area. All suitable nesting areas were
surveyed, and no other nests or sensitive habitats were documented for sensitive species
potentially affected by construction activities. Other avian and wildlife species observed included
all species identified in 2022, as well as a red-tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis). Follow-up
surveys for burrowing owls are proposed in 2024 before construction activities to refine
exclusion zones and mitigation measures.
A biological assessment was conducted for the Quivira Mines that reviewed the most recent
species lists for the area provided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and NNDFW (Tetra
Tech 2022b). All potential species in the area that are federally threatened, endangered,
candidates for listing, or are included on NESL were evaluated for potential to occur at the site.
The biological assessment concluded that no federally listed species have the potential to occur
in the Quivira Mines area and that no critical habitats for any ESA-listed species are within the
area. The biological assessment concluded that investigation and construction activities will
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
19
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
have no effect on the ESA-listed Mexican spotted owl (Slrix occidentalis liicida), southwestern
willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus), yellow-billed cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus ssp.
occidentalis), Zuni bluehead sucker (Catostomus discobolus yarrowi), Colorado pikeminnow
(Ptychocheilus lucius), razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus), or Zuni fleabane (Erigeron
rhizomatus) and will have no effect on these species' designated critical habitats. A separate
assessment may be required for construction activities that will occur over a longer time frame
during any removal action.
The biological assessment identified three NESL species with the potential to occur in the
Quivira Mines area: golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos), mountain plover (iCharadrius montanus),
and Naturita milk-vetch; however, these species do not require an effects determination (Tetra
Tech 2022b). The biological assessment identified conservation measures for NESL species to
protect the continued existence of the above-listed species in the Quivira Mines area during the
proposed action.
2.1.8 Meteorology and Climate
Climate at the Quivira Mines is semiarid with a high annual net pan evaporation rate of 54 inches
per year, far exceeding the annual precipitation of 11.08 inches. Daily temperature and
precipitation data from Western Regional Climate Center Station 293422 in Gallup, New
Mexico, (about 20 miles southwest of the Quivira Mines) was examined for years 1976 to 2016
(Western Regional Climate Center 2018). Data from 2016 to the present from this station and
other stations near the Quivira Mines were not available. The station data indicate the following
weather trends:
• Annual average maximum temperature is 66.0 degrees Fahrenheit (°F), and annual
average minimum temperature is 31.6 °F.
• Average maximum monthly temperatures peak in July at 87.7 °F, and average minimum
monthly temperatures are lowest in December at 13.4 °F.
• Average annual precipitation is 11.08 inches.
• The most precipitation typically occurs in July and August, averaging 1.72 and
1.92 inches, respectively.
• The least amount of precipitation typically occurs in June, averaging 0.42 inch.
• The area receives approximately 30.6 inches of snow from October to May, primarily
from November through April.
Figure 9 shows the City of Gallup monthly average temperature, precipitation, pan evaporation,
and snowfall. Wind typically originates from the southwest (Figure 10).
Exhibit 3 provides precipitation frequency estimates over several average recurrence intervals for
the City of Gallup from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (2006). For
example, a 10-minute storm in this area that deposits 0.994 inch of rain is likely to occur once
every 100 years. These estimates provide a better description of precipitation event intensities
and how durations could affect the Quivira Mines and associated arroyos.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
20
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
Exhibit 3. Precipitation Frequency Estimates
Duration
Average Recurrence Interval
1 Year
5 Years
100 Years
1,000 Years
5 Minutes
0.195
0.338
0.654
0.955
10 Minutes
0.296
0.515
0.994
1.45
30 Minutes
0.494
0.859
1.66
2.43
2 Hours
0.725
1.23
2.44
3.66
Note:
Precipitation frequency estimates in inches based on frequency analysis of partial duration series. Estimates have an
upper bound confidence interval at 90 percent. Estimates are from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (2006).
2.2 PREVIOUS RECLAMATION AND REMOVAL ACTIONS
Previous mine reclamation and removal activities at the Quivira Mines are summarized
chronologically below and shown on Figure 11 while reclaimed features are detailed in Table 1:
• 1980 to 1982: Reclamation of the former Kerr-McGee Ponds on UNC property included
removal of the pond berms and former proto ore stockpile and grading to match the
surrounding land (Weston 2019a). The reclaimed material was placed in Pond 1 at CR-1.
The estimated remaining volume of contaminated soils at the Kerr-McGee Ponds is
34,000 bank cubic yards.
• 1985 or 1986: Reclamation of CR-1 and CR-1E included specified removals of mine
dewatering pumps; mine equipment including hoists, compressors, headframes, and
generators; buildings; and foundations. The sediment ponds were scraped and filled, and
wastes were consolidated at one location at each mine. The wastes (mainly waste rock
and low-grade ore with less than 0.10 percent uranium) were capped with 6 to 12 inches
of fill material. Estimated volume of the CR-1 waste pile and former sediment ponds is
929,200 bank cubic yards. Wastes at CR-1E are in a low waste pile blended into the
surrounding topography (rather than in an above-grade pile), and erosion is not
significant. Estimated volume of waste at CR-1E including the waste rock, former pond,
and industrial and step-out areas is 49,300 bank cubic yards. No record of execution of
this work is available from the mine owners, but current visual conditions indicate that
this work was completed as specified in the reclamation work plan (Quivira Mining
Company 1987).
• 2010: Time-critical removal action (TCRA) to repair fences, grade and seed the western
slopes of the CR-1 waste pile, install sediment control structures to CR-1, and repair mine
access roads and the Red Water Pond Road (USEPA 2010c). USEPA repaired the bridge
near the CR-1 waste pile.
• 2010: TCRA removal of approximately 110,000 bank cubic yards of soil from Step-Out
Area #1 associated with the NECR Mine (Figure 11). Excavated soil was placed in a soil
consolidation area within the NECR Mine (MWH 2010).
• 2012: TCRA to excavate 17,374 bank cubic yards of contaminated soil, place excavated
materials onto the waste rock stockpile at CR-1, reconstruct the road and shoulder area
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
21
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
between State Road 566 and Unnamed Arroyo #2, and revegetate disturbed areas)
(Conestoga Rovers and Associates Ltd. [CRA] and SENES 2013).
• 2012: TCRA removal of approximately 32,000 bank cubic yards of impacted soils from
the East Drainage Area associated with the NECR Mine (Figure 11). Excavated soil was
placed in a soil consolidation area within the NECR Mine (MWH 2013).
• 2017: Vent shaft removal activities at five ventilation shafts included excavating a
combined estimated 10,293 bank cubic yards of impacted soil from VH-1, VH-2, VH-3,
VH-4, VH-5, and bridge abutments. All excavated material was consolidated into the
CR-1 waste pile. Residual contaminants remain immediately adjacent to the concrete vent
shaft caps to avoid disturbance of the closures. Any remaining residual waste at these
locations is 3 to 10 feet bgs and was capped with a minimum of 3 feet of clean fill
material (Weston 2019b).
• 2023 and 2024: Erosion control efforts to limit further offsite migration of waste and
improve nearby erosion and sedimentation conditions.
2.3 PREVIOUS SITE INVESTIGATIONS
The nature and extent of the contamination at CR-1, CR-1E, and the Kerr-McGee Ponds were
delineated via gamma scans and soil sampling and analysis. Based on results of the scans and
sample analysis, most of the waste is within the fenced areas at CR-1, CR-1E, and the
Kerr-McGee Ponds.
Previous environmental investigations for the Quivira Mines include:
• Initial gamma screening investigations in 2008 and 2009 to conduct a surface screen for
gamma radiation at CR-1, CR-1E, arroyos up and downstream of the site, Red Water
Pond Road, and the cornfield of a local resident (Weston 2010).
• RSE field investigations in 2010 and 2011 including collection and analysis of surface
and subsurface soil and static and scan gamma surveys at CR-1, CR-1E, Unnamed
Arroyo #2, the Pipeline Canyon Arroyo, Red Water Pond Road, and Pipeline Canyon
Road (SENES 2011).
• Supplemental soil sampling and static and scan surveys in 2011 by USEPA at two former
cornfields, a former irrigation storage pond that stored water pumped from the mine,
and portions of Unnamed Arroyo #2 upstream from CR-1 (Ecology and Environment,
Inc. 2012).
• Vent hole assessment work between 2011 and 2017 to assess the gamma activity
in the surface soil of the five vent holes associated with the Quivira Mines (Weston
2016, 2019b).
• Data gap collection of additional soil borings in 2015 to better delineate the lateral and
vertical extents of contamination associated with CR-1 and CR-1E (data collected by
Weston and not published). The data were used, together with data collected previously
by SENES (2011), to estimate the total volume of waste rock at the two mines in this
EE/CA.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
22
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
• A Kerr-McGee Ponds assessment in 2017 including collection and analysis of surface
and subsurface soil samples (Weston 2019a).
• Data gap investigation in summer 2022 including identification and sampling of three
background study areas (BSA) for different geologies at the site, refining the lateral and
vertical extent of contamination at the site, construction of wells in alluvium at CR-1,
geotechnical test pits in waste piles and borrow soil, installation of soil moisture probes,
and installation of a weather station (Tetra Tech 2023b).
Because of the significant depth to groundwater, arid climate, and interbedded, confining
geology in the region, rainfall and surface water infiltration do not directly impact confined
groundwater in the Westwater Canyon Member. Moreover, no drinking water wells are currently
completed in the Westwater Canyon Member near the Quivira Mines. Groundwater impacts to
shallow groundwater from the adjacent NECR Mine and UNC Mill Facility were evaluated by
USEPA in 2023 (USEPA 2023). No direct pathway is available from the surface waste rock at
the Quivira Mines to the Westwater Canyon Member. Potential impact of the Quivira Mines on
shallow alluvium groundwater was evaluated during a 2022 data gaps investigation. Two wells
were installed in alluvium and screened at the alluvium-bedrock interface at CR-1. An
insufficient volume of water was present in the wells to sample. Water in the wells has been
checked each quarter, but no water has been present. Therefore, the scope of this EE/CA focuses
only on the nature and extent of contamination at the site in surface and near-surface soil.
2.4 SOURCE, NATURE, AND EXTENT OF CONTAMINATION
The source, nature, and extent of waste materials at the Quivira Mines were characterized during
the RSE investigation and follow-on investigations. The following subsections present the
calculation of BTVs, results of the investigations, sources and nature of contamination, and
extent of contamination.
2.4.1 Background Threshold Values
CR-1 is within 1 mile of the NECR Mine and was initially thought to be in the same geological
setting. Thus, background levels developed for the NECR Mine (MWH 2006) were originally
also applied to the Quivira Mines. However, after analysis, the data did not appear to fit the
varied Quivira Mines site geologies. Therefore, background studies were conducted at the
Quivira Mines in summer 2022 (Tetra Tech 2023b).
BSAs were sampled in three different geologies: Quaternary alluvium, Mulatto Tongue of
Manco Shale, and Bartlett Barren Member of the Crevasse Canyon Formation (Figure 5). The
Dalton Sandstone Member is a vertical cliff forming unit at the site and was not sampled because
it has limited exposure. BSAs were selected to be up- or cross-wind to releases at the Quivira
and NECR Mines and the UNC Mill Facility. Exposed geologic units at each lease area are
described below.
• CR-1 Exposed Units. The Bartlett Barren Member is located at CR-1 upslope of the
CR-1 waste pile and lower pond area. A cliff forming unit, the Dalton Sandstone
Member, is located between the Bartlett Barren Member and Mulatto Tongue of Mancos
Shale at CR-1. The Mulatto Tongue of the Mancos Shale is present at the base of the cliff
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
23
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
at CR-1. Similar to the area south of the Kerr-McGee Ponds, a unit of the Mulatto
Tongue of the Mancos Shale may also be present locally above the Dalton Sandstone
Member as evidenced by gamma activity in bedrock above. Quaternary alluvium is
present at the toe of the CR-1 waste pile and lower pond area drainage and is derived
from upslope geologic units.
• CR-1E Exposed Units. A cliff forming unit, the Dalton Sandstone Member, is located
upslope of CR-1E. The Mulatto Tongue of the Mancos Shale underlies most of CR-1E.
Quaternary alluvium is present at and downslope of CR-1E and is derived from
upslope geologic units. The Quaternary alluvium overlies the Mulatto Tongue of the
Mancos Shale bedrock locally.
• Kerr-McGee Ponds Exposed Units. The Mulatto Tongue of the Mancos Shale is
present on the hillslopes surrounding the Kerr-McGee Ponds area. A cliff-forming unit,
the Dalton Sandstone Member, is located between units of the Mulatto Tongue of the
Mancos Shale. Quaternary alluvium is present at the Kerr-McGee Ponds area and is
derived from upslope geologic units.
BTVs for each BSA were calculated (Exhibit 4) based on the 95 percent upper tolerance limit
with 95 percent coverage (UTL95-95) (Tetra Tech 2023b). The limit represents a 95 percent
probability (or confidence) that 95 percent of samples from background are below that value.
To identify the appropriate BTV for each lease area, the range of Ra-226 and metals
concentrations in non-mining impacted alluvium at and around each lease area were compared
to BTVs from each BSA. Ra-226 is discussed below as it is the primary risk driver at AUM
lease areas.
• The BTV for Ra-226 in Quaternary alluvium (BSA-1), derived from the Bartlett Barren
Member, Gibson Coal Member, and Point Lookout Member, is lower than the 1.5 to
2 pCi/g range of Ra-226 concentrations in non-mining impacted alluvium at and around
CR-1, CR-1E, and the Kerr-McGee Ponds. This suggests that concentrations of Ra-226 in
alluvium are influenced by upslope parent material such as the Mulatto Tongue of the
Mancos Shale (BSA-5) at CR-1E and the Kerr-McGee Ponds and the Bartlett Barren
Member (BSA-2) and Mulatto Tongue of the Mancos Shale (BSA-5) upslope of CR-1.
• The BTV for Ra-226 in alluvium derived from the Mulatto Tongue of the Mancos Shale
(BSA-5), is about 2 pCi/g higher than Ra-226 concentrations in non-mining impacted
alluvium at and around CR-1, CR-1E, and the Kerr-McGee Ponds. This suggests that
concentrations of Ra-226 in alluvium are not influenced by upslope parent material
such as the Mulatto Tongue of the Mancos Shale (BSA-5) at CR-1E and the
Kerr-McGee Ponds.
• The BTV for Ra-226 in alluvium derived for the Bartlett Barren Member (BSA-2) was
compared to the non-mining impacted alluvium at and around CR-1, CR-1E, and the
Kerr-McGee Ponds and found to be within the 1.5 to 2 pCi/g range of observed values.
Therefore, UTL95-95 values for the Bartlett Barren Member (BSA-2) were used to
identify BTVs, COCs, and COECs at the Quivira Mines.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
24
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
Exhibit 4. Background Threshold Values
Analyte 1
Quaternary Alluvium
(BSA-1)
Bartlett Barren Member
of the Crevasse Canyon
Formation
(BSA-2)
Mulatto Tongue of
Mancos Shale
(BSA-5)
ProLICL
UTL95-95
from
ProLICL
ProLICL
UTL95-95
from
ProLICL
ProLICL
UTL95-95
from
ProLICL
Distribution
Distribution
Distribution
Aluminum
Nonparametric
4,800
Normal
6,004
Normal
6,731
Antimony
Normal
0.202
Normal
0.291
Normal
0.121
Arsenic
Normal
6.556
Nonparametric
8.9
Normal
6.476
Barium
Normal
88.5
Normal
110.9
Normal
170.8
Beryllium
Normal
0.55
Gamma
1.036
Normal
0.559
Cadmium
Normal
0.2
Nonparametric
0.42
Normal
0.11
Chromium
Nonparametric
4.8
Normal
6.263
Normal
7.704
Cobalt
Nonparametric
8.1
Normal
8.602
Normal
5.028
Copper
Normal
11.54
Nonparametric
27
Gamma
10.37
Iron
Nonparametric
12,000
Normal
19,094
Normal
15,805
Lead
Nonparametric
14
Normal
17.09
Nonparametric
11
Manganese
Nonparametric
240
Normal
360.5
Normal
287.4
Molybdenum
Nonparametric
0.43
Normal
0.406
Normal
0.471
Nickel
Nonparametric
11
Normal
10.11
Normal
9.492
Selenium
Normal
1.22
Nonparametric
2.5
Normal
1.475
Silver
Normal
0.06
Nonparametric
0.2
Gamma
0.122
Thallium
Nonparametric
0.5
Nonparametric
0.41
Lognormal
0.28
Uranium
Gamma
0.991
Nonparametric
2.4
Normal
0.907
Vanadium
Nonparametric
11
Normal
17.93
Normal
15.64
Zinc
Nonparametric
110
Nonparametric
100
Normal
42.75
Radium-226
Normal
1.321
Normal
1.954
Normal
3.975
Gamma
Radiation
Nonparametric
12,600
Nonparametric
13,700
Nonparametric
13,100
Notes:
1 Units for metals are milligram per kilogram; units for Radium-226 are picocurie per gram; and units for
gamma are counts per minute.
BSA Background study area
UTL95-95 95 percent upper tolerance limit with 95 percent coverage
2.4.2 Source and Nature of Contamination
The main source of contamination at the Quivira Mines is waste rock1 derived from the
uranium-bearing Westwater Canyon Member from an estimate depth of 1,800 feet below grade
that was brought to the surface at CR-1 and CR-1E along with uranium ore. Dewatering of the
Westwater Canyon Member was required to conduct mining. Mine water was brought to the
1 Waste rock or overburden consists of rock and target minerals in concentrations too low for economic recovery. It
is removed from the earth along with the ore. Waste rock includes granular, broken rock that ranges from fine sand
to large boulders, depending on the nature of the formation and mining methods employed.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
25
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
surface and discharged to settling ponds at CR-1 and CR-1E. Fines settled in the ponds and were
periodically removed for uranium recovery. Settled solids from these ponds along with drilling
fluids were dewatered at the Kerr-McGee Ponds, and proto ore encountered during drilling, as
well as dewatered solids, were also stockpiled for uranium recovery.
The areas of concern at the Quivira Mines for soil contamination are CR-1, CR-1E, and the
Kerr-McGee Ponds, as well as step-out areas around CR-1 and CR-1E indicated by elevated
Ra-226 soil sampling results and scan and static gamma survey results. Potential impacts to
adjacent arroyos are also of concern.
Figure 12 presents the transport pathways at the Quivira Mines and a typical cross-section
through the CR-1 waste pile. The primary contaminant transport pathways are slope failure and
erosion of waste or contaminated soil by surface water, deposition in adjacent arroyos, and
subsequent erosion and redeposition in the arroyos during storm events. Wind erosion of waste
may also move contamination from the surface of the mine waste to adjacent areas; however, the
waste rock piles at CR-1 and CR-1E were covered with soil during reclamation. Therefore, most
wind deposition would have occurred during mining operations. Fluvial and aeolian waste
deposits may be remobilized and transported off site. Radon gas emanation and the leaching and
dissolution of metals and radionuclides from waste rock piles may also occur. The conceptual
site model (CSM) wire diagram presented on Figure 13 shows the sources of contamination,
release mechanisms, and exposure media, as well as potential human health and ecological
receptors and exposure pathways (discussed in Section 2.5).
2.4.2.1 Waste Characteristics
The RSE included collection of two composite samples of waste rock from CR-1 for analysis for
metals leachability via both the toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) and the
synthetic precipitation leaching procedure (SPLP). The RSE also included analyses of a
composite sample of waste rock from CR-1E for metals leachability via both TCLP and SPLP.
All TCLP results were below detection limits and below regulatory criteria, indicating that the
waste does not exhibit a RCRA toxicity characteristic for hazardous waste if sent for disposal off
site (SENES 2011). Reporting limits for SPLP data were above USEPA and Navajo surface
water quality criteria and inconclusive.
A 2022 data gap investigation included collection of seven composite samples of waste rock for
evaluation of leachability using TCLP and SPLP methodologies for metals and radionuclides
(Tetra Tech 2023b). All TCLP results were below regulatory criteria, indicating that the waste
does not exhibit a RCRA toxicity characteristic for hazardous waste if sent for disposal off site.
SPLP metals and radionuclide results were compared to USEPA and Navajo surface water
quality criteria. Ra-226, aluminum, barium, lead, selenium, and uranium in leachate from waste
exceeded surface water quality criteria, indicating that leachate generated could impact surface
water quality at the Quivira Mines. Groundwater is not present in waste rock or alluvium at CR-1
or CR-1E but is present at depth below the Kerr-McGee Ponds. A monitoring well network is
present originating at the UNC Mill Facility tailings ponds and extending beyond the
Kerr-McGee Ponds to track contaminant migration in the Upper Gallup Sandstone.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
26
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
2A.2.2 Geotechnical Characteristics
Geotechnical borings were advanced and test pits were excavated during summer 2022 at CR-1,
CR-1E, the Kerr-McGee Ponds, and potential soil borrow areas. Geotechnical samples were
analyzed for dry and wet bulk density, porosity, constant and falling head conductivity, particle
size distribution, Atterberg limits, standard Proctor compaction, direct shear, and swell or
collapse. The borrow soil samples were also analyzed for agronomic viability. The purpose of
the geotechnical testing was to understand the physical characteristics of the waste and borrow
soil to support radon and hydraulic modeling, suitability of the borrow soil for use as cover
material, waste and borrow soil compaction requirements, plasticity of the waste and borrow soil,
and loading limits before failure.
The mine waste has bulk densities ranging from 1.88 to 1.99 grams per cubic centimeter (g/cm3)
and porosities ranging from 31.4 to 37.5 percent. Saturated hydraulic conductivities ranged from
1.1 x 10"4 to 8 x 10"6, which are indicative of fine sand to loams. Particle size distributions ranged
from silty sands to a sandy lean clay. Clay slickens were observed in the CR-1 waste rock pile.
Atterberg testing identified a liquid limit of 33, plastic limit of 16, and plasticity index of 17 for
the sandy lean clay sample. Proctor compaction testing identified optimum moisture contents
ranging from 11.4 to 15.8 percent with maximum dry bulk densities of 1.74 to 1.91 g/cm3.
Direct shear friction angles ranged from 30 degrees (243 pounds per square foot [psf] cohesion)
to 35 degrees (114 psf cohesion) under loads ranging from 200 to 6,000 psf. In general, the mine
waste is silty and clay sands and exhibits a moderate amount of cohesiveness. Swelling or
collapse is not a concern.
The borrow material has bulk densities ranging from 1.83 to 1.94 g/cm3 and porosities ranging
from 34.4 to 39.6 percent. Saturated hydraulic conductivities ranged from 1 x 10"4 to 7.2 x 10"6,
which are indicative of fine sand to loams. Particle size distributions ranged from silty sands to a
sandy lean clay. Atterberg testing identified a liquid limit of 33, plastic limit of 18, and plasticity
index of 15 for the sandy lean clay sample. Proctor compaction testing identified optimum
moisture contents ranging from 13.4 to 16.6 percent with maximum dry bulk densities of 1.68 to
1.83 g/cm3. Direct shear friction angles ranged from 30 degrees (95 psf cohesion) to 41 degrees
(36 psf cohesion) under loads ranging from 200 to 4,000 psf. In general, the borrow soil is silty
sands and exhibits a low amount of cohesiveness. Swelling or collapse is not a concern.
2.4.3 Extent of Contamination
Data characterizing the extent of contamination collected through the measurement of
radioactivity through gamma scan surveys and total and leachable metals and radionuclides
concentrations during the RSE investigation (SENES 2011) and 2022 data gap investigation
(Tetra Tech 2023b) are used to identify contamination migration pathways and support the risk
assessment and removal decisions. The following subsections describe the results of the RSE
investigation (SENES 2011), Kerr-McGee Ponds removal assessment (Weston 2019a), and 2022
data gap investigation (Tetra Tech 2023b).
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
27
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
2.4.3.1 Technologically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material and
Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material
Uranium is a naturally occurring radioactive material (NORM), and the effects of mining can
lead to technologically enhanced naturally occurring radioactive material (TENORM). Examples
of TENORM at the Quivira Mines include waste rock piles, waste in former settling and
dewatering ponds, contaminated former industrial areas, contaminated onsite access roads, and
areas contaminated by eroding waste.
Areas undisturbed by mining activity are considered NORM and may include upslope land;
bedrock outcrops outside the area of mining activity; alluvium derived from bedrock outcrops
outside the area of mining activity; and inclusions of bedrock outcrops within an area at CR-1
and CR-1E otherwise disturbed by mining activity. At the Quivira Mines, bedrock outcrops
along the cliff bands at CR-1 and CR-1E and upslope of the Kerr-McGee Ponds undisturbed by
mining are considered NORM. Even though the outcrops are not mineralized, they do exhibit
elevated gamma levels and may contribute to elevated Ra-226 and metals concentrations
downslope of these outcrops. In addition, five of the nine former ponds (Ponds 4, 5, 6a, 6b, and
6c) in the lower pond area at CR-1 were reclaimed in 1985 and 1986, which involved excavation
of pond sediments and backfilling with clean borrow material. The source of the borrow material
was not documented but is thought to be the stockpiled material on the northernmost portion of
the CR-1 upslope of the ponds. The borrow material should be considered NORM and does not
require further action. Further, the backfilled borrow material concentrations of radionuclides
and metals are similar to BTVs at BSA-2 (Bartlett Barren Member), which has been identified as
the background for the Quivira Mines.
Figure 14 through Figure 16 present the elevated gamma radiation measurements for the
Quivira Mines. The extent of TENORM at the Quivira Mines as evidenced by observations of
mine waste, mining activity, elevated gamma radiation measurements, and extent of Ra-226 in
soils is shown on Figure 17 through Figure 19. No outcrops of mineralized rock were observed
within the TENORM boundaries; however, outcrops of NORM are present within and upslope of
CR-1 and CR-1E. Contamination from the UNC Mill Facility is present to the south of the
Kerr-McGee Ponds (Figure 16).
2.4.3.2 Gamma Radiation in Surface and Subsurface Soils
Results of gamma surveys at CR-1, CR-1E, and the Kerr-McGee Ponds, as well as in the
Pipeline Canyon Arroyo and Unnamed Arroyo #2, are shown on Figure 14 through Figure 16.
The figures show the extent of elevated gamma radiation at CR-1 and CR-1E, which includes the
waste rock pile, ponds, and industrial areas, and at the Kerr-McGee Ponds, which includes the
former dewatering ponds, proto ore stockpile, and lay down yard. The central area of CR-1,
shown in black Crosshatch, was previously surveyed using static gamma counts rather than a
gamma walkover survey and shows lower gamma activity because of a reclamation cover. An
additional gamma walkover survey across the remainder of CR-1 was conducted in 2022 and
identified erosional migration downslope of the waste pile. Elevated gamma radiation upslope of
the CR-1 waste pile and industrial area is related to NORM outcrops rather than windblown
contamination. Gamma radiation at CR-1E correlates with known waste piles and the industrial
area. Limited impacts were identified in the CR-1 and CR-1E adjacent arroyos, which is
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
28
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
expected given the high energy environment during monsoon rains. Gamma radiation at the
Kerr-McGee Ponds was correlated with the former dewatering ponds, former proto ore stockpile,
and laydown area; however, elevated gamma radiation was also identified upslope to the east,
downgradient to the west (as expected), and to the far south. The elevated gamma upslope
followed a dirt road to the west, but no evidence of mining activity was present. The elevated
gamma to the far south is associated with another site on UNC lands.
2.4.3.3 Metals and Radionuclides in Surface and Subsurface Soils
Limited metals sampling was conducted in subsurface soils at CR-1 and CR-1E in 2011. A more
robust metals evaluation was conducted at the Kerr-McGee Ponds in 2017. In 2022, additional
metals data were collected from surface and subsurface borings at all three lease areas.
Modeled Ra-226 data were plotted to assess if the data correlated with areas of NORM and
TENORM at each lease area to verify that only TENORM would be cleaned up. During this
evaluation, the Quaternary alluvium BSA selected to establish BTVs based on local geology
were lower than areas not impacted by mining at CR-1, CR-1E, and the Kerr-McGee Ponds,
resulting in overestimation of areas requiring cleanup. Ra-226 concentrations in these
unimpacted areas appear to be the result of eroded material from a combination of upslope parent
geologies. Therefore, several model runs were evaluated for CR-1, CR-1E, and the Kerr-McGee
Ponds using the Bartlett Barren Member BSA to better match the local geology, TENORM
extent, and observed Ra-226 concentrations in areas not impacted by mining. Use of the Bartlett
Barren Member BTV of 2 pCi/g was assessed to be the best fit for site conditions. Individual
gamma survey data points converted to estimated Ra-226 were interpolated within the areas
where gamma data are available to create a continuous surface of estimated Ra-226
concentrations at the site (Appendix B, Figure B-l).
Ra-226 surface and subsurface soil concentrations were compared to a cleanup goal of 2 pCi/g
for the portion of the Quivira Mines on Navajo lands and 5.4 pCi/g (PRG) for the portion of the
Kerr-McGee Ponds on UNC property. Figure 17, Figure 18, and Figure 19 show the model
results for Ra-226 at CR-1, CR-1E, and the Kerr-McGee Ponds, respectively. An area of elevated
Ra-226 concentrations south of the site is associated with contaminant migration from another
UNC site to the south and will be addressed separately by UNC. Correlated Ra-226 results are
shown on the left panel of each figure, and the best fit comparison between model results above
2 pCi/g or 5.4 pCi/g at Kerr-McGee Ponds and measured Ra-226 data are shown on the right
panel. Correlated Ra-226 results were in agreement with the gamma radiation results described
in Section 2.4.3.2.
CR-1 Results. The lateral extent and vertical extent of measured Ra-226 contamination at CR-1
and the adjacent arroyo are shown on Figure 20 and Figure 21, respectively. Measured surface
results are in good agreement with gamma-correlated Ra-226 results. Ra-226 was observed in
migrating mine waste along the toe of the CR-1 waste pile slopes. As expected with a
reclamation cover, Ra-226 in subsurface samples in the CR-1 waste pile are elevated.
Contamination extended to the bottom of the waste (up to 59 feet below grade) and did not
appear to have migrated vertically into underlying native soil. Elevated Ra-226 was also
observed in unreclaimed Ponds 1, la, 2, and 3, extending up to 19 feet below grade. Elevated
Ra-226 was also observed at 6 to 7 feet below grade, which is greater than the reclaimed depths
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
29
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
at Ponds 5, 6b, and 6c. The mean Ra-226 concentration at CR-1 was 14.6 pCi/g in surface soils
and 12.6 pCi/g in subsurface soils (0 to 72 inches bgs). The maximum Ra-226 concentration was
468 pCi/g in subsurface soils. The distribution of Ra-226 at CR-1 is shown in Appendix B,
Figure B-l. The distribution of candidate metals of concern at CR-1 (arsenic, barium, chromium,
selenium, uranium, and vanadium) with sufficient data available for plotting are shown in
Appendix B, Figure B-2 through Figure B-7. The presence of metals of concern correlated with
the location of mine waste.
CR-1E Results. The lateral extent and vertical extent of measured Ra-226 contamination at
CR-1E and the adjacent arroyo are shown on Figure 22 and Figure 23, respectively. Measured
surface results are in good agreement with gamma-correlated Ra-226 results. Ra-226 was
observed in migrating mine waste around the perimeter of the CR-1E waste piles and on the
ramp road onto the mine near the pond. As expected with a reclamation cover, Ra-226 in
subsurface samples in the CR-1E waste piles are elevated. Contamination extended to the bottom
of the waste (up to 16 feet below grade) and did not appear to have migrated vertically into
underlying native soil. Elevated Ra-226 was also observed up to 5 feet below grade in the
northern industrial area and 12 feet below grade in the pond. The mean Ra-226 concentration at
CR-1E was 6 pCi/g in surface soils and 30.9 pCi/g in subsurface soils (0 to 72 inches bgs). The
maximum Ra-226 concentration was 429 pCi/g in subsurface soils. The distribution of Ra-226 at
CR-1E is shown in Appendix B, Figure B-l. The distribution of candidate metals of concern at
CR-1E (arsenic, barium, chromium, selenium, uranium, and vanadium) with sufficient data
available for plotting are shown in Appendix B, Figure B-2 through Figure B-7. The presence of
metals of concern correlated with the location of mine waste.
Kerr-McGee Ponds Results. The lateral extent and vertical extent of measured Ra-226
contamination at the Kerr-McGee Ponds on Navajo Nation and UNC property are shown on
Figure 24 and Figure 25, respectively. The vertical extent of Ra-226 at the Kerr-McGee Ponds is
shown on Figure 26. Measured surface results are in good agreement with gamma-correlated
Ra-226 results. Contamination extends to a depth of 2 feet on the Navajo Nation side of the fence
line. The mean Ra-226 concentration on Navajo Nation land north of the Kerr-McGee Ponds was
5.3 pCi/g in surface soils and 4.3 pCi/g in subsurface soils (0 to 72 inches bgs). The maximum
Ra-226 concentration was 9.3 pCi/g in subsurface soils. Contamination generally did not extend
below a depth of 1 foot on UNC property except where dewatering ponds were located where
contamination extended up to 6 feet below grade. The mean Ra-226 concentration on UNC
property at the Kerr-McGee Ponds was 9.5 pCi/g in surface soils and 8.2 pCi/g in subsurface
soils (0 to 72 inches bgs). The maximum Ra-226 concentration was 143 pCi/g in subsurface
soils. Ra-226 was observed migrating to the west. Elevated Ra-226 to the far south is associated
with another UNC site. Elevated Ra-226 to the east and upgradient of the area is likely
associated with the migration of NORM from surrounding hillslopes; however, two small soil
piles had elevated Ra-226. The distribution of Ra-226 at Kerr-McGee Ponds is shown in
Appendix B, Figure B-l. The distribution of candidate metals of concern at the Kerr-McGee
Ponds (arsenic, barium, chromium, selenium, uranium, and vanadium) with sufficient data
available for plotting are shown in Appendix B, Figure B-2 through Figure B-7. The presence of
metals of concern generally correlated with the location of mine waste.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
30
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
2.4.3.4 Mine Water
Historically, groundwater was pumped out of the Westwater Canyon Member during mining
activities at the NECR Mine and Quivira Mines and discharged to the Unnamed Arroyo adjacent
to the mines. Mine water from the Unnamed Arroyo discharged to the Pipeline Canyon Arroyo.
Two alluvium monitoring wells were constructed to bedrock below the CR-1 waste rock pile and
the CR-1 lower pond area. No wells were installed at CR-1E because of the shallow depth to
bedrock. Insufficient groundwater to collect samples has been observed at the two CR-1
alluvium wells.
However, previous groundwater investigations have occurred in alluvium which follows the
erosional surface of the Upper Gallup Sandstone down valley to the south and then west and
two aquifers which dip to the northeast beneath the NECR Mine and UNC Mill Facility (USEPA
2023). The UNC Mill Facility used conventional acid leach and solvent extraction methods to
extract uranium. The acid-waste tailings mixture was pumped to tailings disposal ponds located
adjacent to the Pipeline Canyon Arroyo.
During operations at the Quivira Mines, NECR Mine, and UNC Mill Facility, the following
releases introduced dissolved uranium, Ra-226, gross alpha, and other contaminants into area
groundwater (USEPA 2023):
• Mine water discharges to the Unnamed Arroyo from groundwater extracted from the
Westwater Canyon Member during mining activities at the NECR Mine and Quivira
Mines. Mine water in the arroyo infiltrated into the underlying alluvium and, eventually,
into the Upper Gallup Sandstone, which either created a new source of groundwater or
mixed with existing groundwater.
• Acidic wastewater seepage from UNC Mill Facility tailings disposal ponds into the
underlying alluvium and Upper Gallup Sandstone formations beneath the UNC Mill
Facility and Pipeline Canyon Arroyo.
• A 1979 UNC Mill Facility tailings dam breach release to the lower Pipeline Canyon area
at the UNC Mill Facility and further downstream into the Puerco River.
Based on these historical releases and the hydrogeology of the area, three water-bearing zones
were identified as possibly impacted: alluvium, the Upper Gallup Sandstone aquifer, and the
Westwater Canyon aquifer (USEPA 2023). The alluvium along the Unnamed Arroyo and further
north along Pipeline Canyon are no longer water bearing and have drained to the south and west
down valley. The alluvium is wetted and geochemistry impacted along Pipeline Canyon Arroyo
near the UNC Mill Facility. The geochemistry of the Upper Gallup Sandstone aquifer is
impacted by UNC mill tailings pond releases and a Ra-226 plume is oriented to the northeast
beneath Pipeline Canyon. These three water-bearing zones are extensively monitored by UNC.
The geochemistry of the Westwater Canyon Aquifer was modified by dewatering, oxygen
introduction, and rewatering after cessation of mining in both mines.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
31
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
2.5 RISK ASSESSMENT
Appendix C presents the complete risk assessment. The risk assessment uses laboratory sampling
data from the Quivira Mines to identify the candidate COCs and COECs, provide an estimate of
how and to what extent human and ecological receptors might be exposed to these contaminants,
and describe whether the exposures pose unacceptable risk to the receptors. Appendix C,
Table C-l, provides a summary of the sample results available for the Quivira Mines, and
Appendix C, Attachment C-l, provides the full dataset used in the risk assessment. Appendix C,
Figure C-2, presents the locations of the soil samples used in the risk assessment. The following
subsections present the purpose of the risk assessment, describe the exposure units (EU), and
summarize the risk assessment methodology and results.
2.5.1 Purpose
The purpose of the risk assessment is to estimate current and future human health risk under
appropriate RME scenarios and ecological risk focused on the known ecosystems for the region.
This risk assessment was performed using procedures in USEPA (2001) guidance on risk
assessment and focuses on the completed exposure pathways, primary risk drivers, and source
material as indicated in the "Guidance on Conducting Non-Time-Critical Removal Actions under
CERCLA" (USEPA 1993). The results of the risk assessment are used to assist in removal action
decisions for a site. The HHRA identifies the risk posed to human health by contaminants at the
site and human health candidate COCs at each EU. The ERA identifies the risks posed to
ecological receptors by contaminants at the site and candidate COECs at each EU. The
methodology for the HHRA and ERA is presented in detail in the Navajo Abandoned Uranium
Mines (NAUM) program risk assessment methodology (USEPA 2024a).
2.5.2 Exposure Units
An EU is a geographic area with a particular land use within which an exposed receptor (a
person, animal, or plant) may reasonably be assumed to reside or move at random and where
contact across the EU is equally likely over the course of an exposure duration. The Quivira
Mines EUs were developed by identifying areas of contiguous TENORM contamination and
anticipated future land use. The risk assessment boundary (the entirety of all areas evaluated
within EUs) was established via soil sampling and augmented through examination of gamma
survey data. Areas of NORM, such as natural mineralized outcrops and nonimpacted areas in the
northwestern portion of the site, although not included in the TENORM boundary, were also
included within the risk assessment boundary and as part of the EU because a receptor would
also be exposed to the NORM area when at the site. Appendix C, Table C-2 and Figure C-3
through Figure C-9, present the EUs identified at the site and provide the area and samples
available for each EU; land uses are described in Section 2.1.6. Based on the site evaluation, the
following six EUs were identified at the Quivira Mines. The ERA is conducted on a site-wide
basis; all HHRA EUs were combined to create the site-wide EU.
• CR-1 - The former CR-1 mine is 53 acres and on the Navajo Nation. Several residences
are nearby with the nearest residence approximately 700 feet from the former mine.
Therefore, the Kee'da'whii teeh (full-time Navajo resident) was selected as the RME
receptor for the CR-1 EU.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
32
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
• CR-1E - The former CR-1E mine is 14 acres and on the Navajo Nation. Several
residences are nearby with the nearest residence approximately 800 feet from the former
mine . Therefore, the Kee'da'whii teeh (full-time Navajo resident) was selected as the
RME receptor for the CR-1E EU.
• Kerr-McGee Ponds on the Navajo Nation - A 2-acre portion of the former
Kerr-McGee Ponds is on the Navajo Nation. Several residences are nearby with the
nearest residence approximately 3,000 feet from the Kerr-McGee Ponds. Therefore, the
Kee'da'whii teeh (full-time Navajo resident) was selected as the RME receptor for the
Kerr-McGee Ponds on the Navajo Nation EU.
• Kerr-McGee Ponds on UNC Property - A 19-acre portion of the former Kerr-McGee
Ponds is on privately-owned land and fenced property. Therefore, the UNC outdoor
worker was selected as the RME receptor for the Kerr-McGee Ponds on UNC
Property EU.
• Arroyos on the Navajo Nation - A 16-acre portion of the impacted arroyos is on the
Navajo Nation. The impacted arroyos are deep with steep sides and, thus, difficult
to access. Therefore, the Kqq ei doo nahaazah dah (difficult access open space user) was
selected as the RME receptor for the Arroyos on the Navajo Nation EU.
• Arroyos on UNC Property - A 3-acre portion of the impacted arroyos is on
privately-owned land and fenced property. Therefore, the UNC outdoor worker was
selected as the RME receptor for the Arroyos on UNC Property EU.
• Site-Wide - A 137-acre area encompasses all the human health exposures units for
evaluation of the ecological receptors at the Quivira Mines.
2.5.3 Human Health Risk Assessment
This subsection describes the key elements of the HHRA methodology. An HHRA is the process
for evaluating how people are impacted as a result of exposure to one or more environmental
stressors, such as metals or radiation. Exposure is how a contaminant can enter a body (for
example, by eating produce that absorbed contaminants, breathing contaminated dust, touching
contaminated materials, or radiation emanating from soil). This risk assessment uses
Navajo-specific exposure scenarios, as explained below, to determine how a person can be
exposed to contamination at AUMs on the Navajo Nation. For areas on UNC property, a
site-specific outdoor worker was used in the risk assessment. This HHRA focuses on soil
contamination only. The HHRA does not include ingestion of surface water or groundwater by
people or animals. Safe drinking water is supplied to residents in the Quivira Mines area.
Wells used for livestock have been tested and are upgradient of the known groundwater
contamination in the area. The arroyos are mostly dry, and the ponds are dry since mine
operations have stopped.
The HHRA evaluates whether site-related contaminants of potential concern (COPC) detected in
soil pose unacceptable risks to potential current and future people at a site under conditions at the
time of the EE/CA (unremediated conditions) (USEPA 1989, 1993). The HHRA includes the
following components: data evaluation and selection of COPCs, exposure assessment, toxicity
assessment, and risk characterization.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
33
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
Any contaminant with a maximum detected value exceeding its COPC screening level is retained
as a COPC for the HHRA risk calculations. The COPC screening levels are based on a 1x10 6
cancer risk and a hazard index of 0.1 for a Navajo resident. Appendix C, Table C-l, provides the
COPC screening. Based on the screening, the following contaminants were identified as COPCs
and are included in the risk estimates in the HHRA: Ra-226 in secular equilibrium, aluminum,
arsenic, barium, cadmium, cobalt, copper, iron, manganese, molybdenum, selenium, thallium,
uranium, and vanadium.
The exposure assessment is the process of measuring or estimating intensity, frequency, and
duration of human exposure to a contaminant in the environment. The CSM describes the
exposure setting and identifies potentially complete exposure pathways by which receptors
(both people and ecological) could contact site-related contaminants. The CSM is provided on
Figure 13.
Exhibit 5 presents a brief description of each receptor along with the associated geographic
distribution. The specific exposure pathways and inputs for these receptors evaluated in the
HHRA are provided in Appendix C, Table C-3. Figure 27 presents a graphic depiction of Navajo
residential exposure pathways, including the Dine Lifeways.
Exhibit 5. Quivira Mines Receptors
Exposure Units
Receptor Name
Receptor Description
CR-1, CR-1 E, and
Kerr-McGee
Ponds on the
Navajo Nation
Kee'da'whff teeh
(Full-Time Navajo
Resident)
Members of the Navajo Nation that live full time at a site.
Includes external exposure to radiation, incidental ingestion
of soil, dermal exposure to soil (metals only), inhalation of soil
(or dust), ingestion of homegrown produce and gathered wild
plants, and consumption of animal products from raised
animals (meat, milk, and eggs) and hunted animals (meat),
as well as plant exposures (ingestion, dermal, and inhalation)
from Dine Lifeways practices including medicinal and
ceremonial exposures.
Arroyos on the
Navajo Nation
Kqq ei doo
nahaazah dah
(Difficult Access
Open Space
User)
A member of the Navajo Nation that enters the arroyo 1 hour
per day for 30 days a year to collect plants, herd animals, or
hunt. Includes external exposure to radiation, incidental
ingestion of soil, dermal exposure to soil (metals only),
inhalation of soil (or dust), ingestion of homegrown produce
and gathered wild plants, and consumption of animal
products from raised animals (meat and milk) and hunted
animals (meat), as well as plant exposures (ingestion,
dermal, and inhalation) from Dine Lifeways practices
including medicinal and ceremonial exposures
Kerr-McGee
Ponds and
Arroyos on UNC
Property
UNC Outdoor
Worker
A worker that is assumed present on site 8 hours per day,
2 days per week, 50 weeks per year. Exposure pathways
evaluated include external exposure to radiation, incidental
ingestion of soil, dermal exposure to soil (metals only), and
inhalation of soil (or dust).
Notes:
CR-1 Quivira Church Rock No. 1 Mine
CR-1E Quivira Church Rock No. 1 East Mine
Kerr-McGee Kerr-McGee Corporation
UNC United Nuclear Corporation
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
34
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
The toxicity assessment identifies the toxicity parameters needed for the risk assessment. The
toxicity values used in the streamlined HHRA are all standard values provided by USEPA. Risk
characterization proceeds by combining the results of the exposure and toxicity assessments. For
the NAUM program HHRAs, the risk characterization process described in Appendix C was
used.
The intake factors for all exposure pathways used in the HHRA were calculated using the
NAUM Risk Calculator (USEPA 2024b). The cumulative cancer risk for the age-adjusted adult
and child and noncancer hazard for the child receptor (or adult receptor in the case of the outdoor
worker) for each EU and soil interval are provided in Appendix C, Table C-7, and summarized in
Exhibit 6.
Exhibit 6. Cancer Risks and Noncancer Hazards
Exposure Unit
Soil Interval
Cancer Risk
Adult
Noncancer
Hazard
Child
Noncancer
Hazard
CR-1
Surface Soil
1x102
8
10
Subsurface Soil
3x102
8
10
CR-1 E
Surface Soil
2x10 2
8
10
Subsurface Soil
8x10 2
10
20
Kerr-McGee Ponds on the
Navajo Nation
Surface Soil
2x10 2
9
10
Subsurface Soil
2x10 2
9
10
Kerr-McGee Ponds on
UNC Property
Surface Soil
2x10 4
0.05
-
Subsurface Soil
2x10 4
0.08
-
Arroyos on the Navajo Nation
Surface Soil
6x10 4
5
0.5
Subsurface Soil
6x10 4
8
0.7
Arroyos on UNC Property
Surface Soil
2x10"5
0.03
-
Subsurface Soil
2x10"5
0.03
-
Notes:
Bolded values exceed the target cancer risk or target hazard quotient.
Not applicable
CR-1 Quivira Church Rock No. 1 Mine
CR-1E Quivira Church Rock No. 1 East Mine
Kerr-McGee Kerr-McGee Corporation
UNC United Nuclear Corporation
Candidate COCs are identified based on the cancer risk exceeding the target cancer risk of 1x10 4
or a noncancer hazard of 1 for the RME receptor at the EU. Exhibit 7 presents the candidate
COCs for each EU and soil interval as identified in Appendix C, Table C-7.
Exhibit 7. Candidate COCs Identified Based on Cancer Risks and Noncancer Hazards
Exposure Unit
Soil Interval
Cancer Risk
Noncancer Hazard
CR-1
Surface and Surface
Radium-226 in SE
Arsenic
Chromium1
Cobalt
Iron
Manganese
Thallium
Uranium
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
35
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
Exhibit 7. Candidate COCs Identified Based on Cancer Risks and Noncancer Hazards
(Continued)
Exposure Unit
Soil Interval
Cancer Risk
Noncancer Hazard
CR-1 E
Surface and Surface
Radium-226 in SE
Arsenic
Chromium1
Arsenic
Cobalt
Iron
Manganese
Thallium
Uranium
Kerr-McGee Ponds on the
Navajo Nation
Surface and Surface
Radium-226 in SE
Arsenic
Chromium1
Cobalt
Iron
Manganese
Thallium
Uranium
Kerr-McGee Ponds on UNC
Property
Surface and Surface
Radium-226 in SE
-
Arroyos on the Navajo Nation
Surface and Surface
Radium-226 in SE
Arsenic
Manganese
Arroyos on UNC Property
Surface and Surface
-
-
Notes:
1 No speciation data are available for chromium; therefore, chromium is assumed to be 100 percent
hexavalent chromium.
No COC identified based on a cancer target risk of 1 x104 or noncancer target hazard of 1.
COC Contaminant of concern
CR-1 Quivira Church Rock No. 1 Mine
CR-1E Quivira Church Rock No. 1 East Mine
Kerr-McGee Kerr-McGee Corporation
SE Secular equilibrium
UNC United Nuclear Corporation
2.5.4 Ecological Risk Assessment
An ERA is the process for evaluating how likely the environment will be impacted as a result of
exposure to one or more environmental stressors, such as radionuclides or metals. The objective
of the ERA is to evaluate whether ecological receptors may be adversely affected by exposure to
contaminants. The ERA is intended to provide input for risk management decision-making at
each lease area while maintaining a conservative approach protective of ecological populations
and communities. This ERA follows the guidelines in the NAUM risk assessment methodology
(USEPA 2024a).
As described in USEPA (1993a) EE/CA guidance, a risk assessment is used to help justify a
removal action, identify what current or potential exposures should be prevented, and focus on
the specific problem that the removal action is intended to address. NAUM ERAs include a
screening-level ecological risk assessment (SLERA) and SLERA refinement. The SLERA
includes Steps 1 and 2 of USEPA's eight-step ERA process (USEPA 1997) and is intended to
provide a conservative estimate, using maximum concentrations, of potential ecological risks and
compensate for uncertainty in a precautionary manner by incorporating conservative
assumptions. The SLERA refinement includes a refinement of Steps 1 and 2 and is intended to
provide additional information for risk managers. Candidate COECs are identified based on the
results of the SLERA refinement for soil.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
36
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
The ERA evaluated the Quivira Mines as a single site-wide EU. The SLERA COPECs for soil at
the Quivira Mines are presented in Appendix C, Table C-8. Contaminants in soil for which the
hazard quotient was greater than or equal to 1.0 were U-238, U-234, Ra-226, arsenic, barium,
chromium, lead, manganese, nickel, selenium, thallium, uranium, vanadium, and zinc.
Candidate COECs and the calculated hazard quotient risk estimates are listed in Appendix C,
Table C-10 for plants and invertebrates, Table C-l 1 for birds, and Table C-12 for mammals. The
site-wide candidate COECs are summarized in Exhibit 8.
Exhibit 8. Site-Wide Candidate COECs
Candidate Contaminant of Ecological Concern
Receptor
Soil
Interval
Uranium-238
Uranium-234
Radium-226 in SE
Arsenic
Barium
Chromium
Lead
Manganese
Selenium
Thallium
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
Plants
Surface Soil
--
--
X
--
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
--
--
Subsurface Soil
X
X
X
--
X
X
--
X
X
X
X
--
--
Invertebrates
Surface Soil
--
--
"
X
X
X
--
--
X
Birds
Surface Soil
X
--
X
"
"
X
X
Mammals
Surface Soil
X
Subsurface Soil
--
--
X
X
Notes:
Not a candidate COEC
X Candidate COEC
SE Secular equilibrium
2.5.5 Risk Assessment Results Summary
Candidate COCs and COECs were identified based on available laboratory data. The HHRA and
ERA results indicate that risk is above a level of concern for the contaminants listed in Exhibit 9.
Exhibit 9. Candidate COCs and Candidate COECs Recommended for Further Evaluation
Exposure
Unit
Media
Candidate COC or COEC
Uranium-238
Uranium-234
Radium-226 in SE
Arsenic
Barium
Chromium1
Cobalt
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Selenium
Thallium
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
Surface/
CR-1
Subsurface
—
—
X
X
—
X
X
X
—
X
—
X
X
—
—
Soil
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
37
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
It
l.,U.4..L u
Exhibit 9. Candidate COCs and Candidate COECs Recommended for Further Evaluation
(Continued)
Candidate COC or COEC
Exposure
Unit
Media
Uranium-238
Uranium-234
Radium-226 in SE
Arsenic
Barium
Chromium1
Cobalt
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Selenium
Thallium
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
CR-1E
Surface/
Subsurface
Soil
--
--
X
X
--
X
X
X
--
X
--
X
X
--
--
Kerr-McGee
Ponds on the
Navajo Nation
Surface/
Subsurface
Soil
--
--
X
X
--
X
X
X
--
X
--
X
X
--
--
Kerr-McGee
Ponds on
UNC Property
Surface/
Subsurface
Soil
--
--
X
Arroyos on
the Navajo
Nation
Surface/
Subsurface
Soil
--
--
X
X
X
Arroyos on
UNC Property
Surface/
Subsurface
Soil
Site-Wide
Surface Soil
--
--
X
X
X
X
"
"
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
(Ecological
Risk)
Subsurface
Soil
X2
X2
X
"
X
X
X
X
X
X
--
--
Notes:
X
COC
COEC
CR-1
CR-1E
EE/CA
Kerr-McGee
SE
UNC
No speciation data are available for chromium; therefore, chromium is assumed to be 100 percent
hexavalent chromium.
Uranium-234 and uranium-238 concentrations exceed the ecological no observed effect concentration
for plants in a single subsurface sample (location KMP-SB28 from 60 to 66 inches below ground
surface) in Kerr-McGee Ponds on UNC Property. This area is considered a hot spot and any
recommendations for uranium-234 and uranium-238 apply only to the hot spot.
Not a candidate COC or COEC. Not recommended for further evaluation in this EE/CA.
Candidate COC and/or COEC. Recommended for further evaluation in this EE/CA.
Contaminant of concern
Contaminant of ecological concern
Quivira Church Rock No. 1 Mine
Quivira Church Rock No. 1 East Mine
Engineering evaluation/cost analysis
Kerr-McGee Corporation
Secular equilibrium
United Nuclear Corporation
2.6 RISK MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS
Risk management is a different process from risk assessment. The risk assessment establishes
whether a risk is present and defines the magnitude of the risk. In risk management, the results of
the risk assessment are integrated with other considerations to make and justify risk management
decisions. Risk managers must understand the risk assessment, including its uncertainties and
assumptions. By understanding the potential adverse effects posed by candidate COCs and
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
38
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
COECs and the removal actions themselves, risk managers can balance the costs and benefits of
the available removal alternatives. Understanding the uncertainties associated with risk
assessment is critical to evaluating the overall protection of any remedy (USEPA 1997a).
U-238 and its decay products is the primary COC at the Quivira Mines. U-238, U-234, Th-230,
and Ra-226 in secular equilibrium were evaluated in the risk assessment to include toxicity from
all radionuclides in the U-238 decay chain. For risk management, site data for Ra-226 were used
to represent the soil concentration of U-238; however, the human health PRGs for the Navajo
resident and the UNC outdoor worker and the NAUM PERG use toxicity values that include
toxicity from the entire U-238 decay chain. Use of Ra-226 for risk management reduces the
number of radionuclides evaluated when establishing the extent of radiological contamination.
The risk assessment for the Quivira Mines identified numerous candidate COCs and COECs.
Radiological contamination is the predominant risk driver at the Quivira Mines; thus, the extent
of Ra-226 above the selected RAG will primarily be used to establish the extent of the removal
action. No candidate COCs were identified in the Arroyos on UNC Property EU; therefore, this
EU is not discussed further in the risk management section. In addition to Ra-226, candidate
COCs at the site are arsenic, chromium, cobalt, iron, manganese, thallium, and uranium, and
candidate COECs are arsenic, barium, chromium, lead, manganese, selenium, thallium, uranium,
vanadium, and zinc. U-234 and U-238 are also candidate COECs at a single location
(KMP-SB28) in subsurface soil at the Kerr-McGee Ponds on UNC Property EU.
The NAUM risk management process involves assessment of various lines of evidence for
candidate COCs and COECs. Lines of evidence considered in the risk management process
include:
• Refinement of candidate COCs and COECs:
o Comparison of site concentrations to background concentrations (Table 2). Candidate
COCs and COECs below background are removed from further analysis.
o Consideration of natural forms of chromium
o Assessment of co-location via a comparison of the metals distribution to the Ra-226
preliminary removal action extent. Metal COCs and COECs with concentrations
above human health PRGs and NAUM PERGs that are fully co-located with the
Ra-226 preliminary removal action extent are removed from further analysis.
• Refinement of candidate COECs only:
o Potential impacts of site risks for candidate COECs based on a comparison of site
concentrations to NAUM PERGs (USEPA 2024c)
o Analysis of contaminant distribution
o Assessment of other uncertainties
Refinement of the exposures, inputs, and uncertainties for candidate COCs is not warranted
because the HHRA was developed using Navajo-specific exposure scenarios and a site-specific
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
39
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
scenario for private property. Refinement of the exposures, inputs, and uncertainties for the ERA
is warranted because the ERA was completed using literature-based assumptions and inputs.
Section 2.6.1 presents the background comparison, Section 2.6.2 discusses the natural forms of
chromium, Section 2.6.3 presents and describes the human health PRGs and NAUM PERGs,
Section 2.6.4 presents the co-location analysis, Section 2.6.5 presents the refinement of candidate
COECs, and Section 2.6.6 presents a summary of risk management conclusions and decisions.
Table 3 presents the results of the risk management analysis and identifies the final analytes
recommended for removal action, as well as the rationale for refinement of each candidate COC
or COEC that is not considered for removal action.
2.6.1 Comparison of Site Concentrations of Candidate Contaminants of Concern and
Contaminants of Ecological Concern to Background Concentrations
The candidate COCs and COECs were compared to background concentrations to identify any
contaminants present at background levels. For the Quivira Mines, the background comparison
used the Bartlett Barren Member of the Crevasse Canyon Formation (BSA-2) results per the
discussion in Section 2.4.1. Two-population statistical tests were performed to compare
concentrations in soil at the site for candidate COCs and COECs. All methods followed USEPA
(2002a, 2010, 2022) statistical guidance for evaluating background concentrations of chemicals
in soil. The background comparison results are presented in Table 2 for each human health and
ecological risk EU.
A tiered approach employing one or more statistical methods was used to conduct two-
population tests. The first tier in this approach compares the median concentrations between the
site and background populations using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test for datasets having all
detected data. For datasets with nondetect results, Gehan's modification to the Wilcoxon rank-
sum (WRS) test (Gehan test) and the Tarone-Ware test were used. These two-population tests are
available in ProUCL (USEPA 2022).
If the first-tier tests indicated that the site concentrations are greater than background
concentrations, no further testing was conducted. If the first-tier tests indicated that the site
concentrations are less than or equivalent to background concentrations, a second-tier test was
used to compare the right-hand tails or upper quantiles of the site and background populations
using the Quantile test (USEPA 1994, 2002c, 2010). Two-sided statistical tests are used in all
cases and employ a Type I error rate of 0.05 (5 percent).
The following null and alternative hypotheses were tested:
• Null hypothesis: The median metal concentration for the site is less than or equal to the
median concentration in the background population.
• Alternative hypothesis: The median metal concentration for the site is greater than the
median concentration in the background population.
The Quantile test (Johnson, Verrill, and Moore II 1987; USEPA 1994, 2000b, 2002b, 2010) was
conducted for all metals where the Gehan, Tarone-Ware, and Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests did
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
40
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
not reject the null hypothesis (that is, when the median site and background concentrations were
concluded not to be significantly different).
The Quantile test is a nonparametric two-population test developed for comparing the right-hand
tails or upper quantiles of two distributions. The Quantile test can be used when some proportion
of high-value measurements (rather than the entire distribution) of one population has shifted
relative to a second population. The Quantile test is not as powerful as the WRS test when the
distribution of site concentrations is shifted in its entirety to the right of the background
distribution. However, the Quantile test is more powerful than the WRS test for detecting cases
where only a small number of high-value measurements are present in the upper quantile of the
site distribution. For this reason, USEPA (1994, 2002c, 2010) guidance recommends the Quantile
test be used in conjunction with the WRS test. When applied together, these tests have more
power to detect true differences between two population distributions.
Exhibit 10 presents the background comparison results for the Quivira Mines EUs. In addition to
Ra-226, uranium was found at concentrations greater than background in all human health EUs
where the analyte was identified as a candidate COC, except for the Arroyos on the Navajo
Nation EU, and is recommended for further evaluation in the EE/CA at those EUs. In addition to
Ra-226, arsenic, barium, chromium, selenium, uranium, and vanadium were found at
concentrations greater than background in the ecological site-wide EU, and are recommended for
further evaluation in the EE/CA.
Exhibit 10. Background Comparison Results Summary
Exposure Unit
Candidate COC or COEC Background Comparison Result
Uranium-238
Uranium-234
Radium-226 in SE
Arsenic
Barium
Chromium
Cobalt
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Selenium
Thallium
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
CR-1
--
--
>BG
BG
~
~
CR-1E
--
--
>BG
BG
BG
~
~
Kerr-McGee Ponds
on the Navajo Nation
--
--
>BG
BG
BG
--
--
Kerr-McGee Ponds
on UNC Property
--
--
>BG
Arroyos on the Navajo
Nation
--
--
BG
>BG
>BG
>BG
>BG
>BG
--
--
BG
BG
>BG
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
Exhibit 10. Background Comparison Results Summary (Continued)
Notes (Continued):
Not a candidate COC or COEC for exposure unit/receptor combination. Background comparison was
not conducted for this analyte and exposure unit.
BG Site concentrations are greater than background concentrations. Candidate COC or COEC is
recommended for further evaluation in the EE/CA.
COC Contaminant of concern
COEC Contaminant of ecological concern
CR-1 Quivira Church Rock No. 1 Mine
CR-1E Quivira Church Rock No. 1 East Mine
EE/CA Engineering evaluation/cost analysis
Kerr-McGee Kerr-McGee Corporation
SE Secular equilibrium
UNC United Nuclear Corporation
2.6.2 Consideration of Natural Forms of Chromium
The assumption used in the HHRA and ERA was that the measured chromium at the site is
entirely hexavalent chromium. Trivalent chromium (CrIII) is the most common oxidation state
and an essential dietary element that aids normal glucose, protein, and fat metabolisms (Agency
for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry 2012). Hexavalent chromium (CrVI) is the most toxic
chromium ion and is a known human carcinogen.
Hexavalent chromium is almost exclusively produced from industrial processes and only
expected from natural sources atNAUM sites at much lower concentrations. Sources of
compounds containing hexavalent chromium in the environment are discharged dye and paint
pigments, wood preservatives, and chrome-plating liquid wastes. Prominent uses of hexavalent
chromium are in processes for production of metal alloys such as stainless steel, protective
coatings on metal, magnetic tapes, pigments for paints, cement, paper, rubber, and composition
floor covering (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry 2012). These industrial
processes or commercial products are not associated with NAUM sites. Hexavalent chromium is
not expected to be elevated above naturally occurring levels at NAUM sites without an industrial
process that created hexavalent chromium. Hexavalent chromium is a known human carcinogen
when inhaled and has been shown to cause tumors in mice and rats when ingested in drinking
water, but little evidence indicates that ingesting trivalent chromium, a dietary supplement, poses
any toxic or carcinogenic risk to humans (USEPA 1998b).
In rare instances in nature, hexavalent chromium may form minerals with uranium; however,
these minerals are not present at NAUM sites. Oxidation of natural sources of trivalent
chromium to hexavalent chromium in soil at NAUM sites is unlikely given typical site
conditions; that is, the sites do not contain ultramafic rock and serpentine soils, which are the
most likely natural source of hexavalent chromium. Furthermore, weather conditions of the
Navajo Nation are arid, and ionic compounds containing chromium typically are not detected in
the desert sandy-loam soils present in the area. Trivalent chromium in soil is typically found in
higher pH (more basic), in aerobic conditions, in low amounts of organic matter, and with
manganese and iron oxides. Trivalent chromium is cationic and adsorbs onto clay particles,
organic matter, metal oxyhydroxides, and other negatively charged particles in contrast to
hexavalent chromium, which does not interact significantly with clay or organic matter. Finally,
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
42
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
desert sandy-loam soils typically contain low amounts of organic matter. Soils from Quivira
Mines have measured pH between 7.8 and 8.5.
The lines of evidence presented above suggest that chromium at the Quivira Mines is likely
present in the less toxic trivalent form and, therefore, should be evaluated as trivalent chromium.
From a risk management perspective for uranium mines, the presence of hexavalent chromium is
expected to be minimal and the assumption that the chromium measured at the site is trivalent
chromium is reasonable and supported by site conditions.
The maximum detected result for chromium is 24 milligrams per kilogram, which is below both
the COPC screening level for trivalent chromium in the HHRA (79 mg/kg) and the lowest
trivalent chromium NOEC in the ERA (34 mg/kg) (based on the mammalian ground insectivore).
Thus, trivalent chromium would not be identified as either a COPC or COPEC and would not be
included in the human health risk calculations or the SLERA refinement. Therefore, chromium is
not recommended for removal action at Quivira Mines.
2.6.3 Preliminary Removal Goals for Human Health and Ecological Health
Human health PRGs and NAUM PERGs were developed for use in risk management
decision-making and determination of RAGs.
Human health PRGs are land-use specific and calculated using the NAUM Risk Calculator
(USEPA 2024b) with the same target cancer and noncancer risk level used to identify candidate
COCs. PRGs for carcinogenic metals and radionuclides are based on a target cancer risk of
lxlO"4, and PRGs for noncarcinogenic metals are based on a target noncancer hazard quotient
of 1.0.
PERGs for radionuclides and metals were developed for NAUM sites by USEPA (2024c).
USEPA (1999) guidance recommends designing remedial actions to protect local populations
and communities of biota rather than protect organisms on an individual basis except for
threatened and endangered species. NAUM PERGs establish analyte-specific thresholds that
correspond to minimal disruption on wildlife communities and populations. Reducing or
maintaining site concentrations to levels below the PERG will support the recovery and
maintenance of healthy local populations and communities of biota.
NAUM PERGs for radionuclides were based on dose assessments using the ERICA Tool
(Brown and others 2008) for terrestrial animals and plants (USEPA 2024a, 2024c). NAUM
PERGs for radionuclides were identified based on the radionuclide concentration corresponding
to a dose rate where individuals have a higher probability to be adversely affected but the
population is still protected (USEPA 2024c). NAUM PERGs for metals were developed using
average exposure parameters for food ingestion rates, toxicity reference values, soil intake
factors, and body weights (USEPA 2024c).
Exhibit 11 presents the human health PRGs and NAUM PERGs for soil for candidate COCs and
COCs greater than background.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
43
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
Exhibit 11. Human Health Preliminary Removal Goals and NAUM Preliminary Ecological
Removal Goals for Candidate COC and COECs in Soil Above Background
Candidate
COC/COEC
Unit
Human Health PRG
Navajo Resident1
Human Health PRG
UNC Outdoor Worker1
NAUM PERG2
Uranium-23434
pCi/g
--
--
430
Uranium-23834
pCi/g
--
--
480
Radium-2265
pCi/g
0.050
5.4
40
Arsenic
mg/kg
--
--
68
Barium
mg/kg
--
--
1,400
Chromium
mg/kg
--
--
250
Selenium
mg/kg
--
--
3.4
Uranium
mg/kg
3.2
--
250
Vanadium
mg/kg
--
--
80
Notes:
1
COC
COEC
Kerr-McGee
mg/kg
NAUM
pCi/g
PERG
PRG
SE
UNC
USEPA
Human health PRGs are from the NAUM Risk Calculator (USEPA 2024b). PRGs for carcinogenic
contaminants are based on a target cancer risk of 1x10 4, and PRGs for noncarcinogenic contaminants
are based on a target noncancer hazard quotient of 1.0.
NAUM PERGs are based on the most sensitive ecological receptor (USEPA 2024c). The NAUM PERG
is applicable site-wide except for uranium-234 and uranium-238 (see note 4).
The NAUM PERG is the minimum PERG for the individual radionuclide.
Uranium-234 and uranium-238 concentrations exceed the ecological no observed effect concentration
for plants in a single subsurface sample (location KMP-SB28 from 60 to 66 inches below ground
surface) in the Kerr-McGee Ponds on UNC Property exposure unit. This area is considered a hot spot,
and any recommendations for uranium-234 and uranium-238 apply only to the hot spot.
Site data for radium-226 are used to evaluate the extent of radionuclides above human health PRGs
and NAUM PERGs. The human health PRG for radium-226 is the PRG for uranium-238 in SE. The
radium-226 NAUM PERG is the minimum PERG for uranium-238 in SE for all feeding guilds (USEPA
2024c) and is based on the individual radium-226 PERG adjusted to include doses from all progeny of
uranium-238 in SE as described in Appendix F of USEPA (2024a).
Not a candidate COC
Contaminant of concern
Contaminant of ecological concern
Kerr-McGee Corporation
Milligram per kilogram
Navajo abandoned uranium mine
Picocurie per gram
Preliminary ecological removal goal
Preliminary removal goal
Secular equilibrium
United Nuclear Corporation
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
2.6.4 Co-Location Assessment
The Ra-226 removal action extent encompasses a large portion of the TENORM area at the
Quivira Mines (Appendix B, Figure B-l). The source of the contamination is from historical
uranium mining activities, and the mining waste. Areas where estimated Ra-226 levels exceed
BTVs is a strong indicator of areas with mine waste, and concentrations of other elevated metals
are expected to be co-located in those areas. Section 2.6.4.1 defines the Ra-226 removal action
extent, and Section 2.6.4.2 assesses whether metals candidate COCs and COECs exceeding
background concentrations are co-located with Ra-226 via a comparison of the metals
distribution to the Ra-226 preliminary removal action extent.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
44
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
2.6.4.1 Development ofRadium-226 Removal Action Extent
The Ra-226 RAG for all EUs is the lesser of the human health PRG and the NAUM PERG
unless either of the preliminary goals is less than the BTV. On the Navajo Nation, the RAG is
based on the BTV because the human health PRGs for all receptors are lower than each of the
geology-specific BTVs. On UNC property, the RAG is based on the human health PRG for the
UNC outdoor worker. No cleanup is recommended in the site-wide EU to address risk to
ecological receptors per the evaluation presented in Section 2.6.5.1. The Ra-226 EPC in the site-
wide EU is 5.9 pCi/g, which does not exceed the NAUM PERG of 40 pCi/g; therefore, Ra-226 is
not a COEC. Exhibit 12 presents the comparison of the human health PRGs, NAUM PERGs, and
geology-specific BTVs for Ra-226 that were considered to establish the RAG.
Exhibit 12. Radium-226 Removal Action Goal Development
Exposure Unit
HH PRG1
NAUM
PERG2
BTV3
Radium-226
RAG
Basis
for RAG
Navajo
Resident
DAOS
UNC
Outdoor
Worker
CR-1
0.050
--
--
40
2.0
2.0
BTV
CR-1E
0.050
--
--
40
2.0
2.0
BTV
Kerr-McGee Ponds
on the Navajo Nation
0.050
--
--
40
2.0
2.0
BTV
Kerr-McGee Ponds
on UNC Property
--
--
5.4
40
2.0
5.4
HH PRG
Arroyos on the
Navajo Nation
--
0.33
--
40
2.0
2.0
BTV
Notes:
Units are in picocuries per gram.
1 HH PRGs are the PRGs for uranium-238 in SE from the NAUM Risk Calculator (USEPA 2024b) and are
based on a target cancer risk of 1x10 4. Site data for radium-226 are used to evaluate the extent of
radionuclides above PRGs.
2 The NAUM PERG is applicable site-wide. The NAUM PERG presented is the minimum PERG for
uranium-238 in SE for all feeding guilds (USEPA 2024c). The NAUM PERG for uranium-238 in SE is
based on the individual radium-226 NAUM PERG that is adjusted to include doses from all progeny of
uranium-238 in SE as described in Appendix F of USEPA (2024a). Site data for radium-226 are used to
evaluate the extent of radionuclides above the NAUM PERG.
3 The BTV is the UTL95-95 for nonduplicate analytical data. If outliers are removed, the BTV is the
UTL95-95 for the dataset with extreme outliers removed (Tetra Tech, Inc. 2023a).
Not applicable
BTV Background threshold value
CR-1 Quivira Church Rock No. 1 Mine
CR-1E Quivira Church Rock No. 1 East Mine
DAOS Difficult access open space
HH Human health
Kerr-McGee Kerr-McGee Corporation
NAUM Navajo abandoned uranium mine
PERG Preliminary ecological removal goal
PRG Preliminary removal goal
RAG Removal action goal
SE Secular equilibrium
UNC United Nuclear Corporation
USEPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
UTL95-95 95 percent upper tolerance limit with 95 percent coverage
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
45
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
The estimated Ra-226 interpolated surface was generated using gamma survey data from the
Quivira Mines as discussed in Section 2.4.3.3. Gamma survey results were converted from
counts per minute to estimated Ra-226 concentrations in pCi/g. For each EU, the Ra-226
preliminary removal action extent for the site was developed using geospatial tools based on the
area estimated to exceed the RAG within the TENORM boundary.
2.6.4.2 Assessment of Metals Co-Location with the Radium-226 Preliminary Removal
Action Extent
The distribution of candidate metal COCs and COECs was compared with the Ra-226
preliminary removal action extent to identify whether concentrations of candidate COCs and
COECs at concentrations above background are co-located with the Ra-226 preliminary removal
action extent. Appendix B, Figure B-2 through Figure B-7, presents the soil sample results for
each candidate metal COC and COEC above background overlain with the Ra-226 preliminary
removal action extent with results screened against relevant BTVs, human health PRGs, and
NAUM PERGs. For candidate COCs and COECs for which RAGs are developed in
Section 2.7.1, the results are also screened against the RAG.
At the Quivira Mines, the extent of barium, chromium, and vanadium (Appendix B, Figure B-3,
Figure B-4, and Figure B-7) above the NAUM PERG and BTVs is entirely co-located within the
preliminary Ra-226 removal action extent or the waste rock stockpile that is planned for
removal. Further assessment of the extent of barium, chromium, and vanadium will not result
in a change in the removal action extent and, therefore, barium, chromium, and vanadium will
not be considered for further evaluation and are not identified as COECs recommended for
removal action.
2.6.5 Refinement of the Ecological Risk Assessment Candidate Contaminants of
Ecological Concern
Per USEPA (1999), ecological risk management decisions should be based on sound science and
clear rationale. As described in USEPA (1999) guidance, establishing preliminary removal goals
for ecological receptors is difficult because of the following:
• Lack of broadly applicable and quantifiable toxicological data
• Number and variety of species potentially present at an EU
• Differences in susceptibility of different species at different life stages to COECs
• Recuperative potential of different species following exposure
• Variation in environmental bioavailability of the candidate COECs
The selected remedies should be protective of ecological receptors in both the short and long
term. Because ecological receptors at an EU are within a larger ecosystem, remedies selected for
protection of these receptors should also assume protection of the ecosystem components upon
which they depend or support. Removal actions should not be designed to protect organisms on
an individual basis but, instead, should be designed to protect local populations and communities
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
46
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
of biota. Evaluation of these factors was incorporated in the EE/CA in the evaluation of the
effectiveness of the removal action alternatives in Section 4.3.
Risk managers should consider the following principles when making ecological
management decisions.
• The potential impact of site risks. When evaluating ecological risks and the
potential for response alternatives to achieve acceptable levels of protection, managers
should consider the following:
o Magnitude or degree of the predicted responses of receptors to the range of
COEC levels
o Severity of the impact (for example, how many species will be affected)
o Areal extent and duration over which effects may occur
o Potential for recovery of the affected receptors
• Actions that will reduce ecological risks to levels that will result in the recovery
and maintenance of healthy local populations and communities of biota. Managers
should consider the actions that will result in an ability for the site to sustain an
ecological structure and function of the local populations, communities, and habitats.
The benefit of risk reduction should be weighed against the ecological cost of habitat
destruction. Excavation destroys plant cover and removes valuable topsoil, which leads to
the degradation of biologically rich areas (Whicker and others 2004). This consideration
is particularly important in vegetated areas because those areas may be used by
ecological receptors and revegetation may be difficult to establish and slow to mature
once established.
• Input from the public and stakeholders. Through the EE/CA Superfund public
comment process and NNEPA review, managers should consider the input or issues
voiced from stakeholders, such as community groups, on any perceived negative short- or
long-term impact of the removal action.
To support managers in understanding the site risks and to provide managers with a balanced
recommendation so that the ecological structure and function can recover and be sustainable for
the long-term risk, risk management should include:
• Development of NAUM PERGs using average exposure assumptions instead of
conversative assumptions and comparison with representative site concentrations (for
example, UCL95)
• Evaluation of analytical data uncertainties, such as frequency of detection (FOD)
• Inclusion of other lines of evidence, including bioavailability, area use factors, and
seasonality of exposures (Appendix C contains more information on these uncertainties)
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
47
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
2.6.5.1 Comparison of Metals Site Concentrations with Preliminary Ecological
Removal Goals for Candidate Contaminants of Ecological Concern
To refine site risks associated with metal candidate COECs for soil above background that are
not entirely co-located within the Ra-226 preliminary removal action extent (arsenic, selenium,
and uranium), estimates of the site-wide EPC (using UCL95 concentrations) at the Quivira
Mines were compared with NAUM PERGs. Exhibit 13 presents the results of the comparison of
the site-wide EPCs to the NAUM PERGs.
As shown in Exhibit 13, the site-wide EPCs for U-234, U-238, Ra-226, arsenic, selenium, and
uranium are less than the NAUM PERGs; therefore, these candidate COECS are not
recommended for removal action.
Exhibit 13. Comparison of Site-Wide EPCs to NAUM PERGs for Soil
Candidate
COEC
Unit
Site-Wide EPC1 -
Surface Soil
Site-Wide EPC1 -
Subsurface Soil
NAUM PERG2
Candidate COEC
EPC > PERG
Uranium-234
pCi/g
--
12
430
No
Uranium-238
pCi/g
--
12
480
No
Radium-226
pCi/g
5.9
16
40
No
Arsenic
mg/kg
5.7
--
68
No
Selenium
mg/kg
3.0
3.1
3.4
No
Uranium
mg/kg
6.2
16
250
No
Notes:
1 EPC as indicated in Appendix C, Table C-9.
2 NAUM PERGs are based on the most sensitive ecological receptor
Not a candidate COEC for the depth interval
COEC Contaminant of ecological concern
EPC Exposure point concentration
mg/kg Milligram per kilogram
NAUM Navajo abandoned uranium mine
pCi/g Picocurie per gram
PERG Preliminary ecological removal goal
2.6.5.2 Assessment of Contaminant Distribution
An analyte could be identified as a candidate COC or COEC and be only detected infrequently in
an EU (for example, less than 5 percent with at least 20 samples). Because of low FOD, the
exposure and resulting risk could be unreasonably elevated and overly conservative. COCs and
COECs should not be removed simply based on the FOD of less than 5 percent, but each case
should be reviewed for analytical certainty and if low FOD potentially indicates a unique hot
spot for risk management consideration. At the Quivira Mines, FOD is greater than 5 percent for
all candidate COCs and COECs.
Risk managers should also consider the assessment of nonmobile ecological receptors (for
example, plant and soil invertebrate communities). Plants and soil invertebrates represent the
basis of the ecological food chain and site concentrations were evaluated in the ERA against the
NOEC or ESL on a point-by-point basis (see Appendix C, Table C-10). Although the use of
literature-based soil toxicity values protective of soil invertebrates and plants is conservative,
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
48
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
risk managers should compare the areas under consideration for removal action with those
locations that have concentrations that exceed a risk-based soil concentration. Appendix B
presents the distribution of all candidate COECs within the TENORM boundary compared to the
NAUM PERGs and geology-specific BTVs. At the Quivira Mines, candidate COECs greater
than background concentrations based on exceedance of a plant or invertebrate NOEC are
U-238, U-234, Ra-226, barium, chromium, selenium, and uranium.
2.6.6 Risk Management Summary and Conclusions
Based on the HHRA and ERA for the Quivira Mines, candidate COCs for soil are Ra-226,
arsenic, chromium, cobalt, iron, manganese, thallium, and uranium, and candidate COECs for
soil are U-234, U-238, Ra-226, arsenic, barium, chromium, lead, manganese, selenium, thallium,
uranium, vanadium, and zinc. Following the lines of evidence considered in the risk management
analysis in the prior subsections, removal action is recommended as follows:
• To address excess human health risk from Ra-226 contamination at the CR-1, CR-1E,
Kerr-McGee Ponds on UNC Property, and Arroyos on the Navajo Nation EUs, removal
of Ra-226 above the applicable RAG for each human health EU is recommended.
• To address excess human health risk at the CR-1, CR-1E, and Kerr-McGee Ponds on the
Navajo Nation EUs from uranium, removal of uranium above the applicable RAG for
each human health EU is recommended.
The conclusions for candidate COCs are based on the results of the risk assessment, background
comparison, and co-location analysis. Conclusions for candidate COECs also include
consideration of the results of a comparison of the site-wide EPCs with the NAUM PERGs, and
are supported by the assessment of uncertainties that are likely to overestimate risk estimates in
the ERA. Exhibit 14 provides the COCs recommended for removal at each human health EU.
No COECs were identified at the site-wide EU, and no removal action is recommended to
address ecological risk at the Quivira Mines. Table 3 presents the results of the risk management
analysis and identifies the final COCs recommended for removal action, as well as the rationale
for refinement of each candidate COC or COEC, which are not considered for removal action.
Exhibit 14. COCs Recommended for Removal Action
Exposure Unit
Receptor
Surface Soil
COCs
Subsurface Soil
COCs
CR-1
Kee'da'whn teeh
(Navajo Resident)
Radium-226
Uranium
Radium-226
Uranium
CR-1E
Kee'da'whn teeh
(Navajo Resident)
Radium-226
Uranium
Radium-226
Uranium
Kerr-McGee Ponds
on the Navajo Nation
Kee'da'whn teeh
(Navajo Resident)
Radium-226
Uranium
Radium-226
Uranium
Kerr-McGee Ponds
on UNC Property
UNC Outdoor Worker
Radium-226
Radium-226
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
49
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
Exhibit 14. COCs Recommended for Removal Action (Continued)
Exposure Unit
Receptor
Surface Soil
COCs
Subsurface Soil
COCs
Arroyos on the Navajo Nation
Kqq ei doo nahaazah dah
(Difficult Access Open
Space User)
--
--
Arroyos on UNC Property
Kee'da'whn teeh
(UNC Outdoor Worker)
--
--
Site-Wide
Plants, Invertebrates,
Birds, Mammals
--
--
Notes:
No COCs or COECs were identified
COC Contaminant of concern
COEC Contaminant of ecological concern
CR-1 Quivira Church Rock No. 1 Mine
CR-1E Quivira Church Rock No. 1 East Mine
Kerr-McGee Kerr-McGee Corporation
UNC United Nuclear Corporation
2.7 REMOVAL ACTION EXTENT
Multiple lines of evidence were used to develop the removal action extent at the Quivira Mines,
including the extent of Ra-226 in surface soil, extent of contamination of other COCs and
COECs outside the Ra-226 extent, risk management considerations, surface and subsurface
waste areas, transport pathways, and disturbed mineralized areas.
2.7.1 Numerical Removal Action Goals
Following the risk management assessment, removal action is recommended for soil for Ra-226
and uranium at the Quivira Mines and for uranium-238 and uranium-234 in the hot spot in the
Kerr-McGee Ponds on UNC Property EU. RAGs were derived for each applicable receptor, EU,
and COC or COEC recommended for removal action. COCs and COECs were identified based
on available laboratory data, comparison to background levels, and other lines of evidence as
summarized in Section 2.6.4.
Table 4 presents the comparison of inputs used to develop the final RAGs for each COC in soil.
No COECs were identified at the site-wide EU, and no removal action is recommended to
address ecological risk at the Quivira Mines. The final RAG is the lesser of the human health
PRG and the NAUM PERG, when applicable, unless either the PRG or PERG is less than the
BTV. If the BTV is greater than the human health PRG or NAUM PERG, the final RAG is to
address material that is distinguishable from background. For purposes of this EE/CA, the BTV
calculated for the Bartlett Barren Member of the Crevasse Canyon Formation (BSA-2) is used to
represent background for delineating contaminated areas. However, the BTVs may not be
representative of the blending of geologic materials from upslope areas and additional lines of
evidence may be considered to identify the cleanup extent. Exhibit 15 provides the selected
numerical RAG for each COC recommended for removal at each EU.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
50
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
Exhibit 15. Selected RAG for Each COC
COC
Unit
Exposure Unit
RAG
RAG Basis
Radium-226
pCi/g
CR-1, CR-1E, and Kerr-McGee Ponds
on the Navajo Nation
2.0
BTV1
Kerr-McGee Ponds on UNC Property
5.4
HH PRG
UNC Outdoor Worker
Uranium
mg/kg
CR-1, CR-1E, and Kerr-McGee Ponds
on the Navajo Nation
3.2
HH PRG
Navajo Resident
Notes:
No COECs were identified.
The BTV is used to represent background for delineating contaminated areas.
BTV Background threshold value
COC Contaminant of concern
COEC Contaminant of ecological concern
CR-1 Quivira Church Rock No. 1 Mine
CR-1E Quivira Church Rock No. 1 East Mine
HH Human health
Kerr-McGee Kerr-McGee Corporation
mg/kg Milligram per kilogram
pCi/g Picocurie per gram
RAG Removal action goal
PRG Preliminary removal goal
UNC United Nuclear Corporation
2.7.2 Other Removal Action Extent Considerations
The preliminary removal action extent was modified based on the evaluation of additional lines
of evidence as follows:
• Surface and subsurface waste areas: Waste rock piles and unreclaimed ponds were
included in the removal action area. Reclaimed ponds and those backfilled portions of
reclaimed ponds no longer containing TENORM were excluded.
• Transport pathways: No additional mine features and areas (such as waste rock
piles and ponds) with potential for future transport of waste material downgradient
were identified.
• Disturbed mineralized areas: No mineralized areas are located at the surface at the
Quivira Mines. All mining was conducted at depth. However, an upslope area at CR-1,
above the cliff band bounding the north side of the mine, was excluded because the area
contains only NORM bedrock outcrops of the Bartlett Barren Member and potentially
Mulatto Tongue of the Mancos Shale that are slightly higher than the Ra-226 RAG.
No mine waste was observed in this upslope area or in the swales draining the area.
• Accessibility and risk management considerations: No inaccessible areas are present
at the Quivira Mines. However, the arroyos adjacent to the mines are deeply incised and
difficult to access. Ra-226 was identified above the RAG in the Unnamed and Pipeline
Canyon Arroyos adjacent to CR-1 and CR-1E; however, EPCs for the two arroyos were
below the RAG. Arroyo soils data collected in 2010-2011 do not reflect more recent
conditions from soil mobility during monsoon events. Recent gamma scanning did not
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
51
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
identify correlated Ra-226 values above the RAG. Therefore, no actionable risk was
identified in the two arroyos.
Figure 28, Figure 29, and Figure 30 present the proposed removal action extent at CR-1, CR-1E,
and the Kerr-McGee Ponds, respectively. The total calculated surface area is 62.9 acres, and the
total estimated volume is 1,005,500 bank cubic yards within the proposed removal action area.
The removal action extent by component is as follows:
• CR-1 Waste Pile, Industrial Area, Lower Ponds, and Step-Out Areas: 38.8 acres;
estimated 929,200 bank cubic yards
• CR-1E Waste Pile, Pond, Industrial Areas, and Step-Out Areas: 11.5 acres; estimated
49,300 bank cubic yards
• Kerr-McGee Ponds Areas: 12.7 acres; estimated 27,000 bank cubic yards
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
52
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
3.0 IDENTIFICATION OF REMOVAL ACTION OBJECTIVES
J
This section presents the RAOs, statutory limits on removal actions, removal scope, and
removal schedule.
3.1 REMOVAL ACTION OBJECTIVES
An early step in developing removal action alternatives is to establish RAOs. RAOs are a general
description of what the removal action will accomplish. RAGs are separate numerical cleanup
goal concentrations. CERCLA does not allow removal action alternatives to require remediation
of NORM or to remediate soil to concentrations below background levels. Taking current and
potential future land use and Navajo cultural considerations into account, the RAOs are to:
• Prevent exposure to soil with contaminants from mining activities that would pose an
unacceptable risk to human health with the reasonably anticipated future land use and
traditional Navajo lifeways
• Prevent exposure to soil with contaminants from mining activities that would pose an
unacceptable risk to plants, animals, and other ecological receptors
• Prevent offsite migration of contaminants from mining activities that would pose an
unacceptable risk to human or ecologic health by soil, surface water, groundwater, or air
The reasonably anticipated reuse is generally residential although areas with steep terrain,
difficult access, or other similar use constraints are identified in the risk assessment and
addressed with reduced exposure parameters. These types of land use include seasonal sheep
camps, difficult access open space, easy access open space, and drainages and ravines. Other
land uses on the Navajo Nation also include livestock grazing, gardening, and wood and plant
gathering. The anticipated reuse is industrial for outdoor workers for the Kerr-McGee Ponds on
privately-owned UNC land.
The COCs, COECs, and numeric RAGs are listed in Section 2.7.
USEPA identified general response actions, screened potential technologies, and developed
alternatives in Section 4.1 that will satisfy the RAOs listed above. Section 4.2 describes the
retained removal action alternatives for the Quivira Mines, and Section 4.3 presents a detailed
analysis of the removal action alternatives with respect to NCP effectiveness, implementability,
and cost criteria. Section 5.0 presents a comparative analysis of the removal action alternatives.
3.2 STATUTORY LIMITS ON REMOVAL ACTIONS
Pursuant to CERCLA Section (§) 104(c)(1), the normal statutory limits for CERCLA removal
actions of $2 million and 12 months do not apply because the selected action will be funded by a
responsible party and not by Superfund.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
53
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
3.3 REMOVAL SCOPE
The scope of the removal action will be to address all solid media contamination at the Quivira
Mines under the assumption that this will be the final action regarding solid media at the site.
The removal action will also protect against potential future impacts on groundwater and surface
water. Post-removal action site controls will be included under an alternative that does not
specify complete removal of contaminants to an offsite location.
3.4 REMOVAL SCHEDULE
NCP requires a minimum public comment period of 30 days following release of the proposed
final EE/CA by USEPA. USEPA and NNEPA will work together to respond to comments
received during the public comment period and publish an action memorandum following the
response to comments. USEPA will provide public notification of the removal action schedule
upon issuance of the action memorandum.
During implementation of the selected removal action alternative(s), several factors may affect
the removal action schedule, including removal action planning and design, cultural and
biological clearances and mitigation, seasonal weather-related restrictions, and access for
construction equipment. Depending on the removal action alternative selected in the final
EE/CA, design and implementation of the construction activities will likely require between
4 and 18 years, depending on alternative selected. Annual post-removal site controls (termed
maintenance within this EE/CA for brevity) include annual inspections and maintenance of
graded and revegetated site surfaces will be necessary at restored areas for at least the first
30 years after restoration because of the long time frame required to reestablish native
vegetation. Annual inspections and maintenance of a repository cap, if selected, will occur as
specified in a site-specific, long-term surveillance plan (prepared in accordance with 10 Code of
Federal Regulations [CFR] § 40.28) with inspection frequencies adjusted based on cover or cap
stability and inspection findings. A 100-year maintenance period is used for onsite capping
alternative cost estimating and comparison purposes.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
54
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
> — I
This section identifies and analyzes the removal action alternatives for the Quivira Mines.
Section 4.1 summarizes the process of screening potential technologies and identifies the
removal action alternatives that may be effective and implementable at the site, Section 4.2
describes in detail the retained removal action alternatives, and Section 4.3 provides a detailed
analysis of the removal action alternatives based on NCP evaluation criteria of effectiveness,
implementability, and cost.
4.1 DEVELOPMENT AND SCREENING OF ALTERNATIVES
This subsection identifies general response actions, identifies and screens technologies, develops
and describes potential removal action alternatives, and identifies the applicable or relevant and
appropriate requirements (ARAR).
4.1.1 Summary of Technology Identification and Screening
The removal action alternative development process involves identifying general response
actions, technology types, and process options that may satisfy RAOs. Table 5 presents the
general response actions that were considered for the AUMs and includes institutional controls
(IC), engineering controls, disposal, and ex situ and in situ treatment. The initial screening below
eliminates infeasible technologies and process options and retains potentially feasible
technologies and process options.
A technology or process option can be eliminated from further consideration if it does not meet
the effectiveness threshold criteria (protection and compliance with ARARs) or substantive
implementability criteria (technical, administrative, availability, and local acceptance), which are
detailed in Section 4.3. In addition, a technology or process option can be eliminated if its cost is
substantially higher than other technologies or process options and at least one other technology
or process option is retained that is protective.
Institutional Controls. ICs include the implementation of access restrictions to control current
and future land use, including traditional Dine Lifeways. ICs would not reduce waste migration
from the site but could be used to protect human health by administratively restricting access to
affected areas. In addition, these restrictions may be used in conjunction with other technologies
to protect an implemented action. While the ICs are not effective as stand-alone remedies, they
are retained as components of alternatives that include capping waste on Navajo lands.
Potentially applicable ICs consist of land use and access restrictions that are described below.
• Chapter land use plans - Land use plans are used on Navajo lands similar to zoning on
private lands to control current and future land uses.
• Deed restrictions - Deed restrictions do not exist on Navajo lands.
• Navajo Land Department homesite lease approvals - Building a home on Navajo
lands requires a homesite lease from the Navajo Land Department. The Navajo Land
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
55
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
Department may restrict homesite leases on or near areas with hazardous conditions from
mining activities.
• Environmental control easements - Environmental control easements are intended for
use at sites that contain or may contain hazardous wastes or substances that may threaten
public health, safety, or welfare or the environment if certain land uses are permitted or if
certain activities are performed on these sites. Environmental control easements are
primarily used to address residual contamination.
Engineering Controls. Engineering controls are used primarily to reduce exposure to
contaminants. These goals are accomplished by creating a barrier that prevents direct exposure to
or transport of waste from the contaminated sources to the surrounding lands. Engineering
controls include surface controls; physical barriers; soil sorting; onsite containment and
consolidation; backfilling of cuts, benches, and pits; and backfilling of underground voids.
• Surface controls - Surface control measures are used primarily to reduce contaminant
transport, direct exposure, and the overall exposure area. Surface controls could be
appropriate in more remote areas where direct human contact is not a primary concern or
as a component of a containment alternative. Surface control process options include
consolidation, grading, revegetation, and erosion controls. These measures are retained at
the Quivira Mines for use in conjunction with other technologies.
• Physical barriers - Physical barriers may include portal closure or site access controls
such as fencing and signage. Physical constraints of the location of AUM waste at many
of the sites may be restrictive to traditional heavy earthwork equipment because of steep
grades and limited working area. These process options are usually integrated with other
technologies to various degrees based on site characteristics and are not effective as a
stand-alone technology. Portal closures will be retained for infilled adits at the Quivira
Mines. The vertical shafts were closed during reclamation but will be closed again if
disturbed during remedy implementation.
• Sorting - Soil and waste sorting is a standard process applied as an intermediate step
between soil or waste excavation and onsite or off-Navajo Nation treatment or disposal
methods. The process goal is to segregate highly contaminated material from less
contaminated material, allowing for different treatment or disposal options. Sorting
reduces the waste volume requiring treatment or disposal, increases the volume of
material that can remain on site with limited or no treatment or containment, and allows
classification of waste to reduce the volume requiring more costly treatment or disposal
options. A full-scale study is planned as part of a TCRA at the Cove Chapter. The goal of
the study is to segregate material at or below cleanup goals from waste requiring offsite
disposal. Sorting is retained and may be considered in conjunction with onsite
consolidation and containment at the Quivira Mines to remove higher concentration
waste for offsite disposal.
• Onsite consolidation and containment - Mine waste can be consolidated and capped to
prevent exposure. Waste from all areas of the site is gathered together, or consolidated,
and then capped. Typically, the cap is an ET cap designed to minimize water infiltration
and leaching of contaminants, control erosion, control radon emissions, and limit
exposure to contaminants. The containment may be directly on site; or waste from
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
56
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
multiple mines can be consolidated and capped at one mine site as a combined action
under CERCLA § 104(d)(4). Combined actions are considered "on site" and, thus, retain
the CERCLA permit exemption for onsite actions. Consolidation and containment is
retained at the Quivira Mines.
• Backfilling of cuts, benches, and pits - Backfilling of aboveground mine workings with
mine waste occurs when mine waste is excavated and consolidated in cuts, benches, and
pits in isolated areas. The mine waste can be either treated to stabilize or solidify as
needed. Placement of mine waste would need to consider surrounding slope steepness
and minimize slope with engineered rock walls to reduce potential for slope failure.
Placing a soil cover over the waste (containment) would be required to reduce erosion
and promote vegetative growth. These mine features do not exist at the Quivira Mines;
therefore, backfilling is not retained.
• Backfilling of underground voids - Backfilling of underground mine workings with
mine waste occurs when mine waste is pushed or pumped down vertical mine workings
(shafts, stopes, and vents) or injection wells, or transported or pumped into and placed
within horizontal workings (adits, drifts, and stopes) and underground vertical workings
(shafts, chutes, raises, winzes, and declines). Mine waste can be placed dry or wet,
depending on access to and whether the mine workings are flooded. Dry placement
requires reopening and rehabilitating adits and shafts for entry and providing a means for
material movement (conveyor). Dry placement at the Quivira Mines is not retained given
that the mine workings are 1,500 to 1,800 feet below grade and wet.
Wet placement requires creating a slurry that can flow or be pumped into the
underground mine workings. Approximately 4,000 gallons of water per cubic yard of
waste is typically required to create a 5 percent solids slurry. Forming a paste mixture
with less water (about 670 gallons of water per cubic yard of waste) is possible, but
directional placement would be required. Locating mine voids and drilling of multiple
large diameter boreholes would also be required to inject slurry. Once injected, the slurry
could partially separate back into solid and water, and this contaminated water could
migrate to surface water or groundwater. Cement or another solidifying agent could be
added to the slurry to reduce separation but would increase the volume of imported
materials and decrease the amount of waste that could be disposed of in the workings.
Wet placement is retained at the Quivira Mines; however, the mine shafts are already
backfilled, requiring drilling of multiple deep injection wells to reach flooded workings.
Disposal. Mine waste can be excavated and disposed of on or off site as a potential remedy.
Onsite disposal may be applicable at mines where waste is consolidated or for locations where a
separate onsite repository would be constructed. Offsite disposal may be applicable if the
disposal site is accessible to a large volume of truck traffic and the waste can be hauled to an on-
or off-Navajo Nation regional repository or a RCRA C or LLRW facility licensed to receive
radiological waste. Pretreatment of waste using solidification or stabilization to address potential
leachability may be considered where repository design does not address the potential for
leachate generation. On- or offsite disposal and on- or off-Navajo Nation disposal are retained
for the Quivira Mines.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
57
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
Treatment. CERCLA and NCP express a preference for the treatment of waste that significantly
and permanently reduces the volume, toxicity, or mobility of contaminants in selecting remedial
actions, where such treatment is practicable. CERCLA § 121(b), 40 CFR § 300.430(a)(l)(iii),
and USEPA (1991a) guidance on principal threat and low-level threat waste describe how to
identify wastes that may be appropriate for treatment. Principal threat wastes are those source
materials considered to be highly toxic or highly mobile that generally cannot be contained in a
reliable manner or would present a significant risk to human health or the environment should
exposure occur.
USEPA has fully considered whether the site contained any principal threat waste, whether that
waste could safely be contained using engineering controls, and whether any treatment options
may be practicable for the waste at the site. As a result of its investigation and analysis, USEPA
concluded that, while individual samples at the site contained higher levels of contaminants that
might be considered principal threat waste, the waste at the site is extremely variable and
heterogeneous and USEPA found no distinct areas of waste rock that were clearly
distinguishable as meeting the definitions of principal threat waste in USEPA (1991a) guidance.
However, to be consistent with USEPA's preference for treatment, USEPA did fully evaluate a
complete range of treatment options. A summary of the treatment evaluation is discussed below.
Ex Situ Treatment. Excavation and treatment involve the removal of waste from a source area
and subsequent treatment using processes that chemically, physically, or thermally reduce
contaminant toxicity, mobility, or volume. Treatment processes have the primary objective of
either (1) concentrating chemicals for additional treatment, disposal, or recovery of valuable
constituents or (2) reducing the mobility of the chemicals. A short screening summary of
different ex situ treatment classes is described below.
• Physical and chemical treatments - Physical treatment processes use physical
separation and the characteristics of materials to concentrate constituents into a relatively
smaller volume for disposal or further treatment. Chemical treatment processes act by
adding a chemical reagent that either removes contaminants from the material or fixates
contaminants within the material matrix. The net result of chemical treatment processes is
a reduction of toxicity and mobility of contaminants in the solid media. Different types of
physical and chemical treatments screened include soil washing, acid extraction, ablation,
milling, solidification, and stabilization.
o Soil washing is a treatment process that involves washing the contaminated waste
(with water) in a heap, vat, or agitated vessel to dissolve water-soluble contaminants.
The most common forms of uranium oxides attached to sand particles in waste rock at
the site have low solubility in water, rendering soil washing ineffective for removal to
below cleanup goals. Dewatered precipitates and sludge must be disposed of at a mill
or RCRA C or LLRW facility licensed to receive radiological waste because of the
concentrating of radionuclides. Because of the low concentrations of uranium in the
waste rock, varying solubilities at different pH ranges for radionuclides and metals,
and limited demonstrated application for AUM wastes, soil washing likely would not
meet cleanup goals and was not retained.
o Acid extraction is similar to soil washing except an acidic solution instead of water
is applied to the waste rock or other contaminated media in a heap, vat, or agitated
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
58
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
vessel. Acid extraction would dissolve a portion of the mineralized uranium attached
to the sand particles; however, some percentage could remain bound in the sand
particles. Dissolved contaminants are subsequently precipitated for additional
treatment and disposal. Based on the uranium mineralization in the waste rock and
varying solubilities of radionuclides and metals at different pH ranges, acid extraction
likely would not decrease concentrations of all contaminants below cleanup goals and
was not retained.
o Ablation can be applied to sandstone-hosted uranium mineralization where the
uranium minerals form a crust on the sand grains. The ablation process mixes water
and waste rock into a slurry and impacts opposing slurry streams, causing collisions
between the sandstone particles and fragments and removing the uranium minerals
coating the sand grains. Uranium mass then shifts from coarse-grain to fine-grain
fraction, resulting in a much smaller volume of waste requiring disposal. Pilot-scale
studies at three sites on the Navajo Nation, including the Quivira Mines, has shown
that up to 95 percent removal of uranium mass from the coarse sand fraction can be
achieved, that the treated materials are not RCRA hazardous, and do not generate
leachable metals or radionuclides above EPA and Navajo Nation water quality
standards. Concentrates are disposed of off site at a RCRA C or LLRW facility
licensed to receive radiological waste. However, ablation has not been able to achieve
low cleanup goals for unrestricted use, such as those established for the Quivira
Mines and Section 32 and 33 Mines. Instead, ablation can be used to reduce uranium
mass for waste consolidated on site and to reduce migration potential. Ablation was
not retained as a standalone or pretreatment treatment technology because it would
increase costs without significantly reducing risk.
o Milling is an offsite commercial process that removes uranium by a combination of
several methods, including pulverization and acid extraction. Concentrations of
uranium in the waste rock at the site are low, so any processing would, therefore,
yield only a minimal amount of uranium. Additionally, milling does not remove
Ra-226 and the resulting mill waste is neither less toxic nor less mobile than the
source material. Thus, milling was not retained for treatment of uranium mine waste.
Milling may be considered as a pretreatment step for recovering uranium before
disposal in a tailings disposal facility; however, an operational mill that is in
compliance with the CERCLA Off-Site Rule is not located within the region and
milling alone as a pretreatment step was also not retained.
o Solidification and stabilization are processes that either physically encapsulates or
chemically alters mine waste to reduce contaminant leachability, mobility, or toxicity.
Neither process addresses radiation concerns. Solidification involves mixing waste
with a binder material such as cement, fly ash, clay, or geopolymers. Stabilization
involves mixing waste with a neutralizing material such as lime/fly ash and
pozzolan/cement. The binder or neutralizing material would have to be hauled to the
site, and a batch plant would need to be set up to mix the material with waste. The
mixing process requires a large quantity of water for binding to occur; therefore, a
water source must be developed or water must be imported from off site. Once the
material is solidified or stabilized, it may be placed into a repository or in
aboveground mine workings as stackable blocks or gravel admixture; however, the
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
59
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
volume of waste requiring disposal greatly increases because of the addition of
binding and neutralizing agents. Furthermore, unless placed in a disposal cell or
repository, the solidified or stabilized material may break apart when exposed to
freeze-thaw and precipitation, potentially increasing leachability. On- or offsite
disposal options are protective and use fewer resources. As a result, solidification and
stabilization were not retained.
• Thermal treatment - Thermal treatment technologies apply very high levels of heat to
the excavated soil in a reactor to volatilize and oxidize contaminants and render them
amenable to additional processing. Thermal treatment is typically used for organic
contaminants and is not effective on radionuclides and metals in soils.
In Situ Treatment. In situ treatment involves treating the contaminated medium where it is
currently located. In situ technologies reduce the mobility and toxicity of the contaminated
medium and may reduce exposure to the contaminated materials; however, they allow a lesser
degree of control, in general, in comparison to ex situ treatment options. A short screening
summary of different in situ treatment classes is described below.
• Physical and chemical treatments - Potentially applicable in situ physical and chemical
treatment technologies include soil stabilization and solidification. In situ stabilization
and solidification are similar to conventional ex situ stabilization in that a solidifying
agent (or combination of agents) induces a chemical or physical change in the mobility or
toxicity of the contaminants. The in situ process uses deep-mixing techniques to allow
maximum contact of the solidifying agents with the contaminated medium. The
technologies were not retained because the waste pile depth and the hillslope orientation
of the waste pile would make the in situ approach problematic. In addition, exposure to
external irradiation by treated materials would remain unless covered with a calculated
depth of soil.
• Thermal treatment - In situ vitrification is a process used to melt contaminated
solid media in situ to immobilize radionuclides and metals into a glass-like, inert,
non-leachable solid matrix. Vitrification requires significant energy to generate sufficient
current to force the solid medium to act as a continuous electrical conductor. In situ
vitrification has been demonstrated only at the pilot scale, and treatment costs are
extremely high compared with other treatment technologies. The technology does not
address exposure from external irradiation from treated materials and is not considered a
feasible option because the infrastructure necessary to deliver high-voltage electricity to a
site is unavailable and portable generators cannot provide sufficient voltage, which makes
the startup and treatment cost prohibitive. Therefore, in situ vitrification was not retained.
• Vegetative treatment - Vegetation treatment (also known as phytoremediation) is an
innovative process that uses plants to remove, transfer, stabilize, or destroy contaminants
in soil or sediment. Phytoremediation methods applicable to AUM waste are limited to
phytoextraction and phytostabilization. Much of the contamination at the site is located in
30- to 60-foot-deep piles, and not all of the waste would be easily accessible by plant
roots. Moreover, because radionuclides and metals cannot be biodegraded, plants used in
phytoremediation must be harvested and sent for disposal as a radioactive waste and
prevention of human or animal consumption of the plants would be necessary. Because of
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
60
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
the depth of waste, limited depth of root penetration, and harvested material handling
requirements, phytoremediation was not retained.
If the treatments discussed above or any other treatment methods are shown to be effective and
practicable before selection of a remedy, USEPA will amend this analysis and consider
such treatments.
4.1.2 Summary of Alternative Development
After an initial screening of general response actions and technologies, containment,
consolidation, and capping along with various disposal process options were the only
technologies identified as being protective, effective, and implementable for the Quivira Mines.
ICs, surface controls, and access controls are feasible but not as stand-alone responses and may
be combined with containment and disposal options. A list of analyzed but excluded disposal
process options for the site is included below and is followed by a list of retained alternatives
comprising excavation and other disposal process options.
The following site-specific disposal alternatives were removed from consideration as infeasible
during development of this EE/CA for the Quivira Mines:
• Excavation, Onsite Ablation, Onsite Capping of Treated Material, and Offsite
Disposal of Concentrates. Ablation may not be able to attain background levels for all
waste, therefore, this potential future disposal alternative would utilize ablation as
pretreatment step to reduce Ra-226 and uranium concentrations posing a risk to people
and ecological receptors and volume before treated material is consolidated and covered
onsite. The pretreatment step offers more contaminant removal than simple onsite
consolidation and capping as contaminant mass remaining on site is reduced by up to
95 percent. Ablation pretreatment could be retained after additional scalability testing and
where a viable offsite disposal alternative at a similar cost is not available and the
community would like contaminant mass and volume reduction before onsite
consolidation and capping.
• Excavation and Disposal at Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act Sites.
Several Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act sites, including the UNC Mill
Facility, assessed for disposal of the Quivira Mines waste were considered infeasible
because those sites were closed, had insufficient capacity to receive the waste, or had
groundwater contamination issues that could prohibit disposal under the CERCLA
Off-Site Rule.
• Excavation and Disposal at Unlicensed Disposal Facilities. Use of two currently
unlicensed locations for new disposal facilities at abandoned coal mines near Grants and
Fort Wingate was considered infeasible because of limitations under 10 United States
Code 2692. Factors included the long time required to license new disposal facilities,
whether the coal mines could meet licensing requirements, and contamination issues at
both sites that could prohibit disposal under the CERCLA Off-Site Rule.
• Excavation and Disposal at White Mesa Mill. The White Mesa Mill facility was
considered for extraction of uranium from waste rock and subsequent disposal in the
adjacent tailings facility. However, disposal at the tailings facility was determined to be
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
61
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
infeasible at this time because of potential contamination issues that would prohibit
disposal under the CERCLA Off-Site Rule. This may be an option in the future if
compliance with the CERCLA Off-Site Rule can be documented and concurrence
obtained from USEPA.
• Excavation and Disposal at the UNC Mill Facility Tailings Area. The UNC Mill
Facility tailings area was selected as the preferred alternative for disposal of
contaminated soil from the NECR Mine. However, disposal of waste from the site at the
UNC Mill Facility tailings area is considered administratively infeasible for the
following reasons:
o The property owner (UNC) is unwilling to accept the waste at this time.
o The process to design placement of the NECR Mine waste at the UNC Mill Facility
tailings area was completed in 2018 (MWH 2018). The design indicates little
likelihood that extra capacity to accept waste from the Quivira Mines would exist
after the NECR Mine removal action. Moreover, evaluating the required changes to
the remedial design would delay the remedial process for the NECR Mine.
o The UNC Mill Facility tailings area is under an NRC license that must be amended
by NRC before placement of any waste. NRC estimates that it will make a decision
on the license amendment request in 2022. Adding waste from the site to that license
termination process would result in further delays.
o The U.S. Department of Energy Legacy Management Program assumes land
ownership and long-term maintenance responsibility for mill sites after termination of
NRC licenses. Adding waste from the site to the design would necessitate
additional delays.
o Both USEPA and the community are committed to implementing both the Quivira
Mines and NECR Mine actions within the smallest possible time frame to minimize
impacts on the community. However, transport and placement of waste from both the
NECR Mine and the Quivira Mines to the UNC Mill Facility tailings area
concurrently would increase potential for construction and transportation bottlenecks
and delays.
Excavation and disposal at the UNC Mill Facility tailings area was eliminated as an
option from this EE/CA because too many legal, administrative, and implementation
hurdles would have to be addressed that would likely add years to both the Quivira Mines
and NECR Mine removal actions.
• Use of Both Upper and Lower Synthetic Liners for Repositories. Onsite disposal was
evaluated as a removal alternative. Each onsite disposal alternative involves two cover
options: (1) using a store-and-release (also known as ET) cover, and (2) using an upper
synthetic liner with a store-and-release cover. Use of both an upper and lower liner has
been screened out as an option because this would add significant additional cost
without adding additional protection. AHydrologic Evaluation of Landfill Performance
(HELP) model was used to evaluate the difference in percolation through 3- and 4-feet
deep ET cap systems. The models showed annual percolation through the cover at
amounts less than the accuracy of the model (0.002453 inch for the ET cap of 3 feet and
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
62
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
0.001598 inch for the ET cap of 4 feet). Because precipitation measurement inputs into
the model are only accurate to 0.1 or 0.01 inch, the modeled percolation value is zero.
This modeling indicates that no liners are necessary to prevent infiltration into the wastes
with an ET cap ranging from 3 to 4 feet in depth.
• Evaluation of Rail Transport of Waste to Disposal Facilities. Two off-Navajo Nation
disposal facilities are set up to receive railcars containing waste rock: a RCRA C landfill
in Deer Trail, Colorado, and a LLRW facility in Andrews, Texas. Rail transport was
evaluated considering three options: (1) extending a rail line from Gallup to the Old
Church Rock Mine about 5 miles from the Quivira Mines, (2) trucking waste 30 miles to
an existing rail spur near High Country Transportation, and (3) trucking waste 14 miles to
a new loading facility along the main rail lines on the Interstate 40 corridor. Because of
costs to purchase land along a right-of-way, costs to construct bridges across arroyos,
long permitting lead times, and a cost of construction of $3 to $4 million per mile, the
option to extend a rail line to the Quivira Mines was assessed to not be viable. Trucking
mileage to an existing rail spur near High Country Transportation is approximately the
same mileage as to the Red Rocks disposal facility, passing through Gallup twice, and
scheduling of loaded and return railcars would require scheduling and holds from the
railroad. Consequently, the option was assessed to not be viable for transport to the
Red Rocks disposal facility. Construction of a loading facility adjacent to the main rail
lines on the Interstate 40 corridor was initially deemed not viable because the BNSF
Railway representatives informed USEPA that no loading facilities could be placed along
the main transit lines in that area. Further, even if allowed, property would have to be
purchased or leased, the loading facility would need to be designed and constructed, and
a spur off the main transit lines would need to be reviewed, approved, and constructed
(Tetra Tech 2024).
USEPA also visited potential rail spur and loading/unloading sites in the Gallup area
(14 miles) and in the Thoreau area (48 miles) from the Quivira Mines and determined
that transloading facilities would need to be constructed and operated to receive the waste
from trucks and transfer into railcars and would create another area requiring cleanup at
the end of the project. USEPA determined that trucking the waste through the
communities would be no different than hauling waste to the Red Rocks disposal facility.
Waste transfer and scheduling would also add additional years to cleanup of the Quivira
Mines. Therefore, USEPA determined that rail transport would have limited benefit to the
local community and was assessed to not be viable (Tetra Tech 2024).
• Evaluation of Truck Transport of Waste to Disposal Facilities. Two main haul routes
were considered for trucking waste from the Quivira Mines to the Red Rocks disposal
facility: (1) south on State Highway 566 to Interstate 40, exiting Interstate 40 at Thoreau,
and then north on State Highway 371 to the facility; and (2) south on State Highway 566
to Pinedale Road/State Highway 11-49 and then south on State Highway 371 to the
facility. These routes are the most direct or safest routes and were both assessed as viable.
Option 1 using the Interstate 40 corridor is the recommended route because of road safety
and capacity, less additive traffic impact from other mines on the Option 2 route, and
fewer communities impacted (Tetra Tech 2024). Exiting Interstate 40 at Thoreau
provides an overpass to the high-traffic railroad lines that parallel Interstate 40. At-grade
crossing of these main rail transit lines with thousands of haul trucks, as envisioned by
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
63
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
screened-out options, is a risk to the truck drivers, trains on the main transit lines, and
nearby communities (Tetra Tech 2024).
Retained Removal Action Alternatives. The following alternatives were retained for further
evaluation in this EE/CA and have been tailored to address site-specific conditions and other
local requirements.
• Alternative 1: No Action - No new treatment, containment, or response action would
occur at the site. Maintenance of the existing soil cover and site controls would continue.
The No Action alternative has been included as a requirement of NCP and to provide a
basis for comparison of the remaining alternatives. Exposure to COCs by human and
ecological receptors would not be reduced.
• Alternative 2: Consolidate and Cap All Waste On Site - All waste rock and
contaminated soils from the Quivira Mines with concentrations above the action levels
would be consolidated and capped on site. A store-and-release cover (ET cap) will be
used. The cover would be designed to meet performance criteria to achieve specified
radon flux attenuation goals.
• Alternative 3: Dispose of All Mine Waste Off Site at Red Rocks Disposal Facility -
Waste rock and contaminated soils with concentrations above the action levels would be
excavated and disposed of at a State of New Mexico permitted offsite disposal facility
located adjacent to but managed separately from the Red Rocks Municipal landfill near
Thoreau, New Mexico. Waste would be transported south on State Highway 566 to
Interstate 40, exiting Interstate 40 at Thoreau, and north on State Highway 371 to the Red
Rocks disposal facility.
• Alternative 4: Dispose of All Mine Waste Off Site at a RCRA C or LLRW Facility -
Waste rock and contaminated soils with concentrations above the action levels would be
excavated and disposed of at a RCRA C and State of Colorado radiological licensed
facility, such as the Clean Harbors RCRA C facility in Deer Trail, Colorado, or an
NRC licensed LLRW facility, such as the WCS facility in Andrews, Texas. Waste
would be transported south on State Highway 566 to Interstate 40, east to Interstate 25,
north on Interstate 25, northeast on State Highway 24, and north on State Highway 71 to
Deer Trail.
Retained removal action alternatives listed above are fully described in Section 4.2.2 and are
carried through a detailed analysis in Section 4.3.
4.1.3 Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements
Pursuant to NCP at 40 CFR § 300.415(j), USEPA has promulgated a requirement that removal
actions attain federal and state ARARs to the extent practicable considering the exigencies of the
situation. The ARARs evaluation completed for the Quivira Mines was comprehensive, and
no ARARs were rejected based on the exigencies of the situation. The Quivira Mines is located
on Navajo Nation and UNC lands. Pursuant to NCP at 40 CFR § 300.5, the term "state" includes
American Indian tribes. Therefore, for the purposes of evaluating potential ARARs, Navajo
requirements will be treated the same as state requirements. The identification of ARARs is an
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
64
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
iterative process; therefore, ARARs are referred to as potential until the final determination is
made by USEPA in the action memorandum.
NCP at 40 CFR § 300.5 identifies ARARs and other "To Be Considered" (TBC) criteria
as follows:
• Applicable requirements are defined as "those cleanup standards, standards of control,
and other substantive requirements, criteria, or limitations promulgated under federal
environmental or state environmental facility siting laws that specifically address a
hazardous substance, pollutant, contaminant, remedial action, location or other
circumstance found at a CERCLA site."
• Relevant and appropriate requirements are defined as "those cleanup standards,
standards of control, and other substantive requirements, criteria, or limitation
promulgated under federal or state environmental facility siting laws that, while not
'applicable' address problems or situations sufficiently similar to those encountered at the
CERCLA site and that is well suited to the particular site."
• TBC criteria consist of advisories, criteria, or guidance that were developed by USEPA,
other federal agencies, or states that may be useful in developing CERCLA remedies and
include non-promulgated guidance or advisories that are not legally binding and that do
not have the status of potential ARARs. TBCs generally fall within three categories:
health effects information with a high degree of credibility, technical information on how
to perform or evaluate site investigations or response actions, and policy.
ARARs apply to onsite actions completed as part of a removal action. The onsite actions
evaluated in this EE/CA will occur on Navajo Nation and UNC lands. Navajo Nation statutory
and regulatory requirements were evaluated as potential ARARs for Navajo Nation lands
(USEPA 1991b). State of New Mexico has regulatory jurisdiction on UNC lands but not on
Navajo Nation lands. Compliance with ARARs requires compliance only with the substantive
requirements contained within the statute or regulation and, pursuant to CERCLA § 121(e)(1),
does not require compliance with procedural requirements, such as permitting or recordkeeping.
ARARs do not apply to offsite response actions. Instead, offsite response actions must comply
with independently applicable requirements (not relevant and appropriate) and must comply with
both substantive and procedural components of the requirements.
USEPA, as the lead agency, is responsible for identifying potential federal ARARs and
evaluating potential State of New Mexico ARARs and Navajo Nation ARARs. For a State of
New Mexico or Navajo Nation requirement to be identified as a potential ARAR, the
requirement must be more stringent than the corresponding federal ARARs.
USEPA has divided ARARs into three categories: chemical specific, location specific, and
action specific. The three categories are described below:
• Chemical-Specific ARARs are usually health- or risk-based numerical values or
methodologies that, when applied to site-specific conditions, result in the establishment
of numerical values. These values establish the acceptable amount or concentration of a
chemical that may be found in, or discharged to, the ambient environment.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
65
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
• Location-Specific ARARs apply to the geographical or physical location of a site. These
requirements limit where and how the response action can be implemented.
• Action-Specific ARARs include performance, design, or other controls on the specific
activities to be performed as part of the response action for a site.
The potential ARARs for this response action are presented and analyzed in Table 6 by ARAR
category and address requirements specific to the alternatives for the Quivira Mines.
4.2 DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES
Section 4.2.1 provides a summary of common site construction and restoration elements
applicable to all alternatives. A detailed description of removal action alternatives and associated
costs, which focuses on the different waste disposal options, is presented in Section 4.2.2.
4.2.1 Common Elements
To reduce repetitive discussion in the detailed alternative analyses, common removal action
elements for Alternatives 2 through 4 are provided in the following subsections.
4.2.1.1 Common Elements for Construction and Restoration
Common removal action elements at the Quivira Mines for construction and restoration for
Alternatives 2 through 4 are described below.
Site Preparation. A laydown area would be established after biological and cultural resource
clearances near the Quivira Mines (Figure 31). Laydown areas include port-a-potties, wash
water, refuse pickup, decontamination station, temporary offices, radiation scanning equipment,
personal protective equipment, first aid supplies, temporary Wi-Fi and radio, and potentially a
construction water well and tank stand. The laydown areas would also include security personnel
and temporary security fencing and signage for access controls. Laydown areas would remain
until completion of the removal action.
A sufficient water supply is not available for construction near the Quivira Mines. Construction
of a new construction supply well near the onsite repository would be needed to provide water
for the project. Utility water could be obtained approximately 20 miles from the City of Gallup
depending on existing infrastructure and the volume of water available. Well depths would likely
range from 500 to 700 feet for the Upper Gallup aquifer and 850 to 1,000 feet for the Lower
Gallup aquifer if Gallup water is not available. Generators for site power would be used to run
the well pump. Therefore, power for the project would be provided by diesel generators for the
temporary work site (laydown) and well site location (if constructed). The diesel generators
would require bulk fuel storage at the laydown area, as well as daily storage on the project site. A
secondary containment area would be constructed around generators, storage tanks, and fueling
area. The generators would provide power for various types of construction equipment, lighting
systems, and pumps. A water storage tank for the water trucks would also be required. If a well
is constructed, it could be left after completion of the removal action for use by the Navajo
community for irrigation or livestock.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
66
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
Cultural and Biological Exclusion and Timing. Cultural resource surveys were conducted in
2010 for CR-1 and CR-1E (SENES 2011) and in 2022 for the preliminary removal action area by
Dinetahdoo Cultural Resources Management. The results of these surveys would be reviewed
and used where possible for planning and removal design. Additional surveys would be
performed after design by a Navajo Nation-approved archeologist, and compliance requirements
for cultural resources would be specified by USEPA with concurrence by the Navajo Nation
Heritage and Historic Preservation Department. For the purposes of this EE/CA and consistent
with other CERCLA actions taken in this area, cultural resources can assume to be avoided or
protected during site work activities and that no special status plant or animal species would be
identified that would limit site work activities.
Natural resource surveys (for example, biological and botanical) for special status species would
be required to verify the current land use for each area, mapped habitat and vegetation cover
types, and recorded locations of potential special status species resources. NNDFW and previous
surveys would be consulted where possible, and new surveys would be conducted if necessary.
Furthermore, if new action areas are identified as part of the selected removal action, these areas
would need to be surveyed before earthmoving activities. If any natural resources are found, then
ARARs would be identified.
The removal actions would involve construction of access and haul roads and a laydown area.
Therefore, additional field surveys and reports of both natural and cultural resources in the
proposed work areas would be required in consultation with the Navajo Nation. The surveys
must conclude that the proposed removal action project area would not affect natural and cultural
resources before design and construction can proceed.
An environmental protection plan would be developed for monitoring protocols during the work
activities and include a review and evaluation of potential impacts to historic properties and
locations. Natural resource (for example, biological and botanical) inspections would be
conducted at the site, and information from these inspections would be included in the
environmental protection plan. Environmental protection would include a review and evaluation
of potential impacts on government-protected species and critical habitats.
Site Access. During the response and restoration activities, site access would be restricted by the
existing fence and temporary fencing that would be constructed where the existing fence may
need to be removed to perform work. Security would be maintained during all non-working
hours while site work is occurring. The site foreperson and the health and safety officer would be
responsible for personnel while they are on the site. To restrict access, the site would remain
completely fenced throughout the duration of construction activities. Temporary fencing would
be used whenever the perimeter fence must be removed for construction access. Alternate
entrances that may be required for portions of the work would be secured when not in use. If
work is occurring at CR-1, CR-1E, and the Kerr-McGee Ponds simultaneously, security would
be provided at all lease areas. USEPA and its authorized representatives, including its
contractors, and representatives of NNEPA would have access to the site at all times. A site
access and security plan would describe the activities used to monitor and control access to the
site during implementation of the response actions and the period of work performance.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
67
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
The alternatives being considered require an extensive amount of soil and water hauling over
several years. An access road would be constructed from Pipeline Canyon Road to the east side
of CR-1 to minimize disturbance of nearby residence along Red Water Pond Road (Figure 31).
CR-1E access to the Kerr-McGee Ponds would use existing access roads and Pipeline Canyon
Road. Existing access roads and Pipeline Canyon Road are graded dirt roads and would not
support 22-cubic-yard (33-ton) off-road articulated haul truck or 16.5-cubic-yard (25-ton)
on-highway haul truck and construction equipment movement. Existing access roads and
Pipeline Canyon Road would require widening and surfacing with gravel or pavement to reduce
dust generation, including water conveyances along and passing under the roads for year-round
operations. During transport on site (between CR-1, CR-1E, and the Kerr-McGee Ponds) and
off site (State Road 566), traffic controls would be necessary. A traffic control plan would be
developed and followed throughout operations. Even with precautions, nearby paved roads
would require maintenance to protect the roadway and road users. To maintain road load limits,
scales would be used to weigh the trucks that navigate Navajo Nation roadways. Observing road
and bridge load limits would help reduce roadway wear and maintain the local roadways in a
safe operating condition. Equipment and materials would be available to restore Red Water Pond
Road and Pipeline Canyon Road as needed.
Air Monitoring. A sampling and analysis plan would be prepared that describes the methods
and procedures for collecting, analyzing, and evaluating air samples within and at the perimeter
of work zones and within the community. Air monitoring stations would be positioned and
operated to monitor dust and airborne contaminant concentrations during grubbing, excavating,
stockpiling, loading of bulk carriers, managing the stockpile, and restoring the site. Air
monitoring results and dust suppression measures would be used to document that offsite
migration of contaminants at unacceptable activity concentrations does not occur, maintain
compliant air quality conditions and a safe working environment, and protect the health of
nearby residents, workers, the general public, and the environment. Frequent water spraying
would be used during soil moving activities at all work zones and for dust suppression. Water
would be sourced from an offsite source or a permanent well installed near CR-1.
Dust Control. Off-road haul routes and site excavation and restoration areas would be wetted so
that dust generation is minimized. Frequent water spraying would be used during soil moving
activities for dust suppression. Further, rock fields and grating would be used to reduce track out
of dirt onto paved surfaces. To maintain the haul routes as laid out, signs and barriers would be
provided, as necessary, to contain traffic along the designated route. Water used for dust control
and cleaning of paved surfaces would be imported or pumped from a new construction well as
described earlier. Alternate methods of dust control, such as chemical polymers, gravel cover,
recycle asphalt, and paving of access and haul roads, will be considered to reduce the water
required. Dust control would be used to maintain compliant air quality conditions and a safe
working environment and protect the health of nearby residents, workers, the general public, and
the environment.
Stormwater Control. Excavated areas would be graded to pre-mining contours when possible
and oriented to reduce scouring with low-energy flow rates and patterns. The drainage system
would be integrated with the topography and existing drainage patterns to the extent possible.
Activities at the Quivira Mines must be evaluated for potential impacts on federally listed species
and critical habitat and for certification to meet the substantive requirements of the National
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
68
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Multi-Sector General Permit. Once the site has been
stabilized, monitoring of construction stormwater runoff would cease and post-removal action
site controls would be initiated. The cost estimates include provisions for ongoing cover
maintenance and erosion control and fence inspection and repair.
Excavation Approach. Waste rock piles and contaminated soils containing metals and
radionuclides above RAGs are the removal areas of concern (Figure 28 through Figure 30). The
estimated 1,005,500 bank cubic yards of waste is easily accessible. Waste excavation methods
considered for the Quivira Mines include standard- to large-size excavators and loaders. Waste
rock piles would be removed to native soil interface after which excavation would proceed in
lifts using field screening techniques such as gamma scanning and X-ray fluorescence
measurements until RAGs are attained. In some areas, excavation may extend to bedrock, at
which point excavation would stop. Confirmation sampling and final status survey sampling
would be conducted to verify attainment of RAGs and RAOs. Waste rock and contaminated soils
would be temporarily stockpiled for load out. Borrow material would first be obtained from on
site; additional imported borrow material may be needed.
Waste Handling and Transfer. For cost estimating purposes, 22-cubic-yard (33-ton) articulated
haul trucks were assumed for onsite transport and 16.5-cubic-yard (25-ton) on-highway haul
trucks were assumed for offsite transport. Waste would be transferred on site using existing and
temporary access roads and Pipeline Canyon Road (Figure 31). Waste transferred off site would
use Pipeline Canyon Road to State Road 566 to avoid the Red Water Pond Road residential
community. No transfer station would be required because the site can be accessed with multiple
types of trucks. Dry brushing of all truck beds and wheels would occur before each truck leaves
the site. During muddy conditions, scraping and spraying of truck tires will also be conducted.
Traffic control planning and implementation would be required for Pipeline Canyon Road and at
the entrance to State Road 566.
Site Restoration Activities. USEPA has developed a matrix to identify the different features and
areas of the Quivira Mines requiring restoration and the typical restoration approaches for each
feature and area. Site restoration approaches for each mine feature and area are described below:
• Waste excavation areas - Excavated areas would be backfilled and compacted with soil
from a local borrow area, contour graded to match adjacent topography, covered with an
erosion control blanket, and seeded using local grasses and forbs. Upslope soil and rock
berms and drainage ditch system would be used to divert run-on around the restored and
disturbed areas.
• Mine portals - The shafts and adits at CR-1 and CR-1E (Figure 2 and Figure 3) were
closed during reclamation; however, the top of the two adits at CR-1E are currently
uncovered. Further, waste excavation activities may disturb these mine portals.
Therefore, the mine portal locations would be evaluated during the removal action to
verify the integrity of the closure and corrective actions would be taken to repair or
augment existing portal closures.
• Access roads - Access roads needed for CR-1E and the Kerr-McGee Ponds already
exist; however, a new temporary access road would be constructed from Pipeline Canyon
Road to CR-1 (Figure 31). Improvements would be made to the existing access roads and
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
69
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
Pipeline Canyon Road to allow construction traffic. After successful restoration of the
disturbed areas of the site, the temporary access roads would be obliterated. Overbank
materials would be moved back onto the road surface. The road pathways would be
contour graded to match surrounding grade and seeded using local grasses and forbs.
Water control bars would be used on portions of the road that have an extended length
and a slope greater than 5 percent. Drainage swales would be covered with rock to
reduce erosion.
• Fencing - Domestic livestock would not be allowed to enter the site until it is fully
restored. Temporary 4-strand barbed wire fencing would be erected around the restored
area (site and borrow area) to protect revegetation efforts from grazing over a period of
up to 30 years. Once vegetation is restored and the site has stabilized, perimeter fencing
at the Quivira Mines may be removed except where a repository is present. Repository
perimeter fencing and signage would remain indefinitely. Restoration activities may take
30 years or more before adequate vegetation is in place and final stabilization is achieved.
• Livestock controls - In addition to fencing, berms or barricades would be constructed on
temporary access roads and benches to reduce ease of access for livestock over the short
term and allow for successful revegetation.
4.2.1.2 Common Elements for Maintenance
Common removal action elements at the Quivira Mines for maintenance for Alternatives 2
through 4 are described below.
This cost assumes maintenance of the ET cap would be required in perpetuity, but for cost
estimating purposes was assumed to include cap inspections, erosion repairs, and revegetation
for 30 years and cap inspections for up to 100 years. USEPA would be responsible for the
long-term maintenance of the repository. Restoration maintenance at the Quivira Mines would
consist of 10 years of erosion repairs and inspections and 30 years of vegetation surveys and
maintenance of revegetation efforts.
Maintenance after Site Restoration. Maintenance at the Quivira Mines would consist of
10 years of erosion repairs with inspections, vegetation surveys, and maintenance of revegetation
efforts extending up to 30 years for restored areas of the site, including excavation areas,
removed roads, and borrow areas. For cost estimating purposes, maintenance would include:
• Inspection and vegetation survey in late spring (up to 30 years)
• Vegetation maintenance, including reseedings and removing weeds (first 10 years and as
needed up to 30 years)
• Erosion control inspection and maintenance survey after the monsoon season (first
10 years)
• Maintenance of the access road until vegetation and restored areas have stabilized (first
10 years)
• Repairs to erosional features and water control berms (first 10 years)
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
70
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
On-Navajo Repository Closure and Long-Term Maintenance. Activities common to
Alternative 2 include:
• Final grading, surface erosion controls, and revegetation of the onsite repository cap
would be designed to limit the visual impact by mimicking local terrain and using local
soils and vegetation (Appendix F).
• Erosion controls on the cap may include biodegradable matting and wattles and use
berms and ditches to direct run-on water around the repository.
• Temporary range fencing would be installed around restored areas during the
revegetation period to stop livestock from disturbing the soil cover and
revegetation efforts.
• Permanent fencing and signage would be installed and maintained around the repository
to control or restrict grazing and access since overgrazing, livestock foot traffic, or
vehicle traffic could damage the cap. A gate would be installed to provide access for
periodic rotational grazing on the cap.
Land use controls would be required for waste placed in a repository to protect the response
action. The form of the land use controls would likely be a land withdrawal or an environmental
covenant, such as an easement to restrict future residential use or activities that would disturb
the cap.
Annual inspection and maintenance of the repository covers would be conducted as specified in a
long-term surveillance plan (10 CFR § 40.28) with inspection frequencies adjusted based on the
cover stability and inspection findings. The annual inspection would consist of checking for
erosion and animal burrows and verifying the integrity of erosion controls. Maintenance would
consist of filling burrows, filling and grading eroded surfaces, clearing accumulated erosion
materials, replanting vegetation, and repairing access roads. Maintenance costs were developed
based on a 100-year duration for the earthen covers placed on top of radiological waste contained
within an onsite repository. For cost estimating purposes, maintenance would include:
• Inspection and vegetation survey in late spring (up to 30 years)
• Vegetation maintenance, including reseedings and removing weeds (first 10 years and as
needed up to 30 years)
• Erosion control inspection and maintenance survey after the monsoon season (up to
100 years)
• Repairs to erosional features and water control berms (first 10 years and as needed up to
30 years)
The repository would be maintained in perpetuity. Additional maintenance costs beyond 100
years assumed for cost estimating purposes will depend on inspection results and updates to the
long-term surveillance plan.
CERCLA Off-Site Rule. Alternatives that involve transportation off site for disposal or
consolidation into a regional repository would require compliance with the CERCLA Off-Site
Rule. In general, the CERCLA Off-Site Rule requires that facilities that accept contaminated or
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
71
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
hazardous wastes from a CERCLA site must follow all applicable regulations and laws (that is,
they must be approved to take those wastes and be in compliance with the applicable federal,
state, and local requirements to do so). The licensed disposal facilities considered for any
alternatives involving offsite consolidation into a repository would be required to have existing
approval under the CERCLA Off-Site Rule.
4.2.1.3 Potential Unavoidable Impacts
Except for Alternative 1 (no action), each of the removal action alternatives would result in an
overall improvement to the local environment. However, for Alternatives 2 through 4,
unavoidable impacts are expected and include:
• Existing vegetation at the Quivira Mines is limited to scrub and grasses with a few small
trees. Geomorphic design of the onsite repository may require removal of juniper trees
northeast of the site. Disturbed areas would be reclaimed after construction, but
reestablishing the existing vegetation will take time.
• Local populations using Pipeline Canyon Road and State Road 566 will be
inconvenienced by heavy equipment activity during the February to November
construction period and by increased truck traffic on Pipeline Canyon Road, State
Road 566, and all other access roads near the site and offsite disposal facility. Generation
of dust on access roads would be minimized through spraying with water during
construction and hauling activities or using chemical polymers, gravel cover, recycle
asphalt, or paving of access and haul roads. Noise would be limited to normal work hours
to avoid disturbing local residents.
• Disruption of sensitive species and habitat during construction activities is not anticipated
at the Quivira Mines based on previous biological surveys. If sensitive species are
subsequently identified during a biological survey before the removal action, the timing
and location of construction activities would be adjusted to limit disturbance and
biological monitoring would be conducted during construction activities.
• Cultural resources were not identified at the Quivira Mines during previous actions.
However, cultural resources were identified west of CR-1 and east of the Kerr-McGee
Ponds. A cultural resource specialist would be consulted during the removal design to
avoid sensitive areas during proposed construction activities. Cultural resource monitors
would be on site during construction activities to oversee that resources are not disturbed
and identify any resources uncovered during excavation activities.
• Increased risk of traffic accidents and fatalities and greenhouse gas emissions is
anticipated because of the trucking of fill, cover material, and waste. As the haul distance
increases, the potential risks also increase. Water would be required for dust control
during excavation, waste compaction, and restoration, and on roads during waste hauling.
Water use, trucking mileage, greenhouse gas emissions, and traffic accident and fatalities
are discussed for each alternative in Section 4.3.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
72
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
4.2.2 Description of Removal Action Alternatives
The following subsections present descriptions of the five removal action alternatives identified
in Section 4.1.2. All haul roads, laydown areas, water sources, and truck and access roads needed
for the removal actions are shown on Figure 31.
4.2.2.1 Alternative 1: No Action
Under Alternative 1, radionuclide and metal COCs and COECs in the waste piles and
surrounding soils would not be addressed. No land use controls, signage, range fencing, or
barriers would be used to limit access at the site. Existing perimeter site fencing would remain.
No removal or site stabilization activities would occur.
4.2.2.2 Alternative 2: Consolidate and Cap All Waste On Site
Alternative 2 includes consolidation and capping waste on site in a repository. Geomorphic
design would be used to enhance the aesthetics of the repository and improve erosion control.
The design approach would be to blend the repository into adjacent hillslopes to mimic
topography and bedrock outcrops and to plant native vegetation compatible with repository cap
and adjacent landscape. An example of a geomorphic design concept for CR-1 is shown in
Appendix F.
Under Alternative 2, the RAOs would be accomplished through excavation, hauling, and
consolidation of an estimated 1,005,500 bank cubic yards or 1,256,875 loose cubic yards of
waste from the Quivira Mines in an onsite repository at or near CR-1 (including a canyon
repository); containment of waste in the onsite repository; and implementation and maintenance
of site restoration measures and land use and access controls to protect the repository and site
restoration process. For cost estimating purposes a 3 mile radius was assumed around CR-1 for
the furthest potential repository location. Site excavation and restoration elements common to all
action alternatives are described in Section 4.2.1.1.
Containment in an onsite repository would involve the construction of an engineered cap over
the consolidated mine waste. Based on HELP modeling, an ET cap of 36 inches of a soil and
gravel admixture is assumed to prevent infiltration of precipitation and snowmelt, control radon
gas flux, and reduce gamma activity to background. For cost estimating purposes a 48-inch
cap is assumed, which is what was the ET cap design that will be used at NECR to cap the
tailings. The ET cap can be designed to be stable on slopes between 5:1 and 3:1 and allow for
slow dispersion of radon gas. Natural, local vegetation would be established on the ET cap. The
ET cap would allow for grazing but would not be suitable as a location for irrigated agriculture
or building development.
Waste would be placed and consolidated in such a manner as to mimic surrounding topography
and benched to create sandstone-faced terraces to blend into the landscape. Every effort would
be made to place waste within draws and box canyons areas and minimize the use of a
monolithic stockpile that is currently present at the site. Nearby sources of soil for cap
construction are available along Pipeline Canyon and include the fluvial deposits in the drainage
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
73
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
and above the earthen dam northeast of CR-1E. Investigations of these borrow sources
performed in 2022 indicated that the soils are suitable material for an ET cap.
Waste from CR-1, CR-1E, and the Kerr-McGee Ponds would be hauled and consolidated at an
onsite repository. Work sequencing assumes that all waste will be placed and compacted in the
repository before capping begins. Excavation areas for Alternative 2 are shown on Figure 32, and
capping and restoration areas are shown on Figure 33. Typical waste consolidation area features
are shown on Figure 34. The onsite repository construction and maintenance costs are based on
the volume of waste contributed to the repository from CR-1, CR-1E, and the Kerr-McGee
Ponds. The overall estimated duration of the project is 4 years.
Site restoration activities include backfilling and grading of waste excavation areas, erosion
controls, and revegetation. Permanent fencing and signage would be installed and maintained
around the repository to prevent damage to the cap. A gate will be installed to provide access for
periodic rotational grazing on the cap. Site restoration activities common to all action alternatives
are described in Section 4.2.1.1. Post-removal visualizations of the restored Quivira Mines are
included in Appendix F.
Removal Action Components
Additional information regarding individual components is provided in Section 4.2.1.1.
Components of the removal action include:
• Excavation of all waste from CR-1, CR-1E, and the Kerr-McGee Ponds
• Excavation and stockpiling of borrow soil for repository cover and site restoration
• Consolidation of excavated waste from all lease areas in an onsite repository within
3 miles of CR-1
• Construction of an engineered cover over consolidated waste at the onsite repository
• Construction and maintenance of permanent fencing and signage around the onsite
repository and installation of a gate to provide access for periodic rotational grazing on
the cap
• Backfilling and restoration at CR-1, CR-1E, the Kerr-McGee Ponds, and the borrow
areas with short-term erosion and stormwater controls, grading, and revegetation
• Construction of temporary fencing and signage around the onsite repository and around
excavated areas at CR-1E, the Kerr-McGee Ponds, and the borrow areas
• Long-term cover maintenance at the onsite repository as described in Section 4.2.1.2
• Maintenance of site restoration areas as described in Section 4.2.1.2
4.2.2.3 Alternative 3: Dispose of All Mine Waste Off Site at Red Rocks Disposal Facility
Alternative 3 is the disposal of waste off site at the Red Rocks disposal facility in McKinley
County, New Mexico. Under Alternative 3, the RAOs would be accomplished through
excavation, transport, and off-Navajo Nation disposal of mine waste and contaminated soil. The
site would be reclaimed through implementation of site restoration measures followed by
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
74
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
maintenance of restored features and use of access controls to protect the site restoration process.
Site excavation and restoration elements common to all action alternatives are described in
Section 4.2.1.1.
An estimated 1,005,500 bank cubic yards or 1,256,875 loose cubic yards of waste from the
Quivira Mines would be hauled 44 miles off the Navajo Nation and disposed of at a specially
designed and managed disposal area at the Red Rocks disposal facility adjacent to the existing
landfill. This area would be created at the facility to manage only this type of waste. The waste
would not be mixed with municipal waste at the neighboring landfill. The facility would have
separate equipment and a separate workforce, and workers would be specially trained to
transport and manage the waste. Waste would be transported on the recommended haul route:
south on State Highway 566 to Interstate 40, exiting Interstate 40 at Thoreau, and north on State
Highway 371 to the Red Rocks disposal facility. Further discussion of the evaluation of haul
routes is provided in Section 4.1.2 and Tetra Tech (2024). The hauling of waste would comply
with applicable Navajo and state permitting requirements for the transport of radioactive
materials. No TCLP metals results exceeded the toxicity characteristic levels; therefore, the
waste piles at the Quivira Mines do not exhibit RCRA hazardous waste characteristics.
No pretreatment of the waste is expected to be required before disposal.
The waste also falls under the Bevill Amendment exemption and would not be regulated as a
RCRA waste in this scenario. In general, the CERCLA Off-Site Rule requires that facilities that
accept contaminated or hazardous wastes from a CERCLA site must follow all applicable
regulations and laws (that is, they must be approved to take those wastes and be in compliance
with the applicable federal, state, and local requirements to do so). The waste disposal facility
would be located on the same property, but separate from the Red Rocks Landfill and operated
under State of New Mexico Groundwater Discharge and Mining permits.
Site restoration activities include backfilling and grading of waste excavation areas, erosion
controls, and revegetation. Site restoration activities common to all action alternatives are
described in Section 4.2.1.1. The Red Rocks disposal facility is 44 miles from the site. A
Stennett analysis was prepared by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) to evaluate the
safety for site workers at the proposed Red Rocks disposal facility during waste tipping,
consolidation, and capping. The Stennett analysis indicated that facility workers would be safe
under the exposure scenario used to develop the analysis. Considerations of the analysis included
the characteristics of the waste including contaminant concentrations, as well as construction
equipment, methods, and durations of worker exposure (USACE 2022).
Figure 35 and Figure 36 show the proposed waste excavation and site restoration areas for
Alternative 3 at the Quivira Mines. For Alternative 3, waste would be transported to and
disposed of at the Red Rocks disposal facility in McKinley County, New Mexico. The
recommended 44-mile haul route to the Red Rocks disposal facility is depicted on Figure 37. The
proposed disposal cell at the Red Rocks disposal facility is shown on Figure 38. The overall
estimated duration of the project is 4.5 years.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
75
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
Removal Action Components
Additional information regarding individual components is provided in Section 4.2.1.1.
Components of the removal action include:
• Excavation of waste from CR-1, CR-1E, and the Kerr-McGee Ponds
• Excavation and stockpiling of borrow soil for site restoration
• Hauling and offsite disposal of excavated contaminated soils at the Red Rocks
disposal facility
• Backfilling and site restoration at CR-1, CR-1E, the Kerr-McGee Ponds, and the borrow
areas with short-term erosion and stormwater controls, grading, and revegetation
• Construction of temporary fencing and signage around excavated and borrow areas
• Maintenance of site restoration areas as described in Section 4.2.1.2
4.2.2 A Alternative 4: Dispose of All Mine Waste OffSite at a Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act C or Low-Level Radioactive Waste Facility
Alternative 4 requires the disposal of waste off site at a RCRA C and State of Colorado
radiological licensed facility, such as the Clean Harbors facility in Deer Trail, Colorado, or an
NRC licensed LLRW facility, such as the WCS in Andrews, Texas, depending on waste
concentration and acceptance limits. Under Alternative 4, the RAOs would be accomplished
through excavation, transport, and off-Navajo Nation disposal of mine waste and contaminated
soil. The site would be reclaimed through implementation of site restoration measures followed
by maintenance of restored features and use of access controls to protect the site restoration
process. Site excavation and restoration elements common to all action alternatives are described
in Section 4.2.1.1.
An estimated 1,005,500 bank cubic yards or 1,256,875 loose cubic yards of waste from the
Quivira Mines would be hauled 625 miles off the Navajo Nation and disposed of at the Clean
Harbors facility in Colorado or 501 miles to the WCS facility in Texas. Waste would be
transported on the recommended haul route: south on State Highway 566 to Interstate 40, east to
Interstate 25, north on Interstate 25, northeast on State Highway 24, and north on State
Highway 71 to Deer Trail, Colorado. Further discussion of the evaluation of haul routes is
provided in Section 4.1.2 and Tetra Tech (2024).
The hauling of waste would comply with applicable Navajo and state permitting requirements
for the transport of radioactive materials. Site restoration activities include backfilling and
grading of waste excavation areas, erosion controls, and revegetation. Site restoration activities
common to all action alternatives are described in Section 4.2.1.1.
The Clean Harbors facility, permitted to receive RCRA Class C hazardous waste and licensed by
the State of Colorado to receive radioactive material, and the WCS facility, licensed by NRC to
receive LLRW, are both in compliance with the CERCLA Off-Site Rule. In general, the
CERCLA Off-Site Rule requires that facilities that accept contaminated or hazardous wastes
from a CERCLA site must follow all applicable regulations and laws (that is, they must be
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
76
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
approved to take those wastes and be in compliance with the applicable federal, state, and local
requirements to do so). The licensed disposal facilities considered for any alternatives involving
offsite disposal would be required to have existing approval under the CERCLA Off-Site Rule.
Disposal at a permitted or licensed facility is a standard disposal method that involves transport
to and disposal at the applicable waste disposal facility. Permitted or licensed facilities are
generally constructed to prevent the release of hazardous or radioactive materials and include
engineered cells and liners that exceed requirements for municipal or commercial solid waste
disposal facilities. No TCLP metals results exceeded the toxicity characteristic levels; therefore,
the waste piles at the Quivira Mines do not exhibit RCRA hazardous waste characteristics. No
pretreatment of the waste is expected to be required before disposal.
Figure 35 and Figure 36 show the proposed waste excavation and site restoration areas for
Alternative 4 at the Quivira Mines. For Alternative 4, the waste would be transported to and
disposed of at the Clean Harbors RCRA C facility in Deer Trail, Colorado, or the WCS facility
licensed by NRC to receive LLRW in Andrews, Texas. The recommended haul routes to the
Deer Trail, Colorado, and Andrew, Texas, disposal facilities are depicted on Figure 39 and
Figure 40, respectively. The shipment of waste by rail was determined not to be a viable option
(see Section 4.1.2 and Tetra Tech [2024]). The overall estimated duration of the project is 17 to
18 years.
Removal Action Components
Additional information regarding individual components is provided in Section 4.2.1.1.
Components of the removal action include:
• Excavation of waste from CR-1, CR-1E, and the Kerr-McGee Ponds
• Excavation and stockpiling of borrow soil for site restoration
• Hauling and offsite disposal of excavated contaminated soils at the Clean Harbors or
WCS facility
• Backfilling and site restoration at CR-1, CR-1E, the Kerr-McGee Ponds, and the borrow
areas with short-term erosion and stormwater controls, grading, and revegetation
• Construction of temporary fencing and signage around excavated and borrow areas
• Maintenance of site restoration areas as described in Section 4.2.1.2
4.3 DETAILED ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES
As required by NCP and described in USEPA (1993) guidance, retained removal action
alternatives are evaluated individually against the following three broad criteria: effectiveness,
implementability, and cost.
In addition, based on USEPA (2016) guidance, five key elements in greener cleanup activities
should be considered throughout the remedy selection process:
• Minimize total energy use and maximize renewable energy use
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
77
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
• Minimize air pollutants and carbon dioxide equivalent (CChe) emissions
• Minimize water use and negative impacts to water resources
• Improve materials management and waste reduction efforts by reducing, reusing, or
recycling whenever feasible
• Protect ecosystem services
For the purposes of alternative evaluation in this EE/CA, these five elements were considered but
a quantitative analysis will not completed until a preferred remedy is selected. NCP evaluation
criteria are described below.
4.3.1 Effectiveness Criterion
This criterion evaluates the threshold criteria of protection and compliance with ARARs, along
with short- and long-term effectiveness and permanence, and reduction in toxicity, mobility, and
volume of waste.
• Overall Protection of Human Health and the Environment - This threshold criterion
evaluates whether each alternative provides adequate protection of human health and the
environment. The assessment of overall protection focuses on whether a specific
alternative achieves adequate protection and how site risks posed through each pathway
addressed by the EE/CA are eliminated, reduced, or controlled through treatment,
engineering, or land use controls. Based on effectiveness and ARAR compliance,
alternatives are either considered protective or not protective.
• Compliance with ARARs - This threshold criterion evaluates whether each alternative
would meet the identified ARARs. Alternatives are either in compliance with ARARs or
not in compliance.
• Short-Term Effectiveness (during Removal Action) - This criterion evaluates the
effects that the alternative would have on human health and the environment under
current conditions prior to the action and during its construction and implementation
phase. The evaluation includes both radiation risks from exposure to the contaminated
soils and risks to the workers and communities under current condition and from
construction work, fuel consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, water use, waste and
materials management, ecosystem protection, and traffic accident and fatality risk during
implementation, and also takes into account the time necessary to complete the action.
• Long-Term Effectiveness and Permanence (after Removal Action) - This criterion
evaluates the results of the removal action in terms of the risk remaining at the site after
response objectives have been met. The primary focus of this evaluation is on the extent
and effectiveness of the controls to manage the risk posed by wastes remaining at the site.
• Reduction of Toxicity, Mobility, or Volume through Treatment - This criterion
addresses the statutory preference for remedies that employ treatment as a principal
element by assessing the relative performances of treatment technologies for reducing
toxicity, mobility, or volume of the contaminated media. Specifically, the analysis should
examine the magnitude, significance, and irreversibility of each estimated reduction.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
78
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
4.3.2 Implementability Criterion
This criterion evaluates the technical and administrative feasibility of implementing an
alternative and the availability of required services and materials.
• Technical Feasibility - This criterion takes into account construction considerations,
demonstrated performance, adaptability to environmental conditions, and timing.
• Availability of Required Services and Materials - This criterion evaluates whether
staff, equipment services, disposal locations are available in the necessary time frames for
construction and maintenance activities. This criterion was combined with technical
feasibility for this EE/CA.
• Administrative Feasibility - This criterion considers regulatory approval and
scheduling constraints.
• Tribal, Supporting Agency, and Community Acceptance - These criteria are
initially addressed in this final EE/CA after input from Navajo Nation and supporting
agencies. Additional input will be received during the public comment period on the final
EE/CA and addressed in the responsiveness summary of the action memorandum.
4.3.3 Cost Criterion
The types of costs assessed include the following:
• Capital costs, including both direct and indirect costs
• Annual maintenance costs
• Net present value of capital and maintenance costs
In accordance with USEPA (1993, 2000) guidance, engineering costs are estimates within
plus 50 to minus 30 percent of the actual project cost (based on year 2023 dollars).
4.3.4 Cost Estimating Process
Cost estimates were prepared in accordance with USEPA (2000) guidelines using engineer's
estimates, unit costs (cubic yard, linear feet, and square foot quantities) from RSMeans 2023 cost
estimating software (Gordian 2023), and vendor quotes. Gallup, New Mexico, was used as the
reference city in the RSMeans software to ensure unit costs for labor, equipment, and supplies
where applicable to work in the region. Unit costs were validated and adjusted where necessary
by verifying that the crew size, equipment, and time allotted for an activity (production rate)
were applicable to earthwork at a large mining construction site in the region.
In accordance with USEPA (1993, 2000) guidance, the engineering costs are estimates that are
expected to be within plus 50 to minus 30 percent of the actual project cost (based on year 2023
dollars). Only the rolled up construction and capital costs, maintenance costs for site restoration,
long-term maintenance costs for repositories, and net present values are presented for each
alternative. Cost details and assumptions are presented in Appendix E.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
79
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
Other construction-related costs were identified and included in the cost approach, including
mobilization and demobilization, contractor site overhead, travel and lodging, third-party
oversight, Navajo Nation tax for on-Navajo Nation activities, and a 20 percent contingency.
Non-construction-related costs required before and during construction activities were also
identified and included in the cost approach, including design, planning, resource surveys,
confirmation sampling, and reporting.
Contingency costs for construction are based on the extra time, equipment, and personnel
required to safely work with radioactive materials; remote location of the site; differences in
labor pool costs between RSMeans estimating software reference cities and the project area; and
potential for changes in material and transportation costs. Changes in the cost elements are likely
as commodity prices change and new information and data are collected during the engineering
design and construction pre-bid and walk-through meetings.
The needs for maintenance costs were identified, including the need for site restoration for a
period of 10 years to address any erosion and 30 years to conduct vegetation surveys and address
any revegetation efforts, and including the need for cap and cover inspection and maintenance
for a period of 30 years and inspection from 31 to 100 years for onsite consolidation and
capping. Project duration (30 years versus 100 years) varies depending on the alternative being
evaluated and is addressed in the cost discussion for each alternative. Any onsite repository
will be maintained in perpetuity. Additional maintenance costs beyond 100 years assumed for
cost estimating purposes, will depend on inspection results and updates to the long-term
surveillance plan.
Common capital and maintenance costs for each removal action alternative include access road
construction, access road reclamation, site restoration, and annual maintenance of site restoration
efforts over 30 years. Annual inspection and maintenance of the repository cap (erosion repairs
and vegetation replanting) would be intensive for the first 30 years because of erosion and
revegetation efforts but would decrease after vegetation is established and consist of inspection
only for years 31 to 100. Maintenance of site restoration and cap restoration efforts is addressed
in Section 4.2.1.2 in more detail. The net present value of each removal action alternative
provides the basis for the cost comparison. The net present value represents the amount of money
that, if invested in the initial year of the removal action at a given interest rate, would provide the
funds required to make future payments to cover all maintenance costs associated with the
removal action over its planned life.
To assess the required funds to be set aside for implementing maintenance activities in the
future, this EE/CA uses a 7 percent discount rate as specified in USEPA (1993) guidance.
4.3.5 Alternative 1: No Action
This subsection provides the detailed analysis of the No Action alternative organized by NCP
evaluation criteria. The No Action alternative is included as a baseline for evaluating the effects
of no action and comparing no action to the other alternatives.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
80
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
4.3.5.1 Effectiveness
Overall Protection of Public Health and the Environment - The No Action alternative is
not protective and would not achieve RAOs. This alternative would not minimize potential
exposure to or transport of COCs or COECs from the site or control radiation and physical
hazards at the site. This alternative would not reduce risk to human health or the environment.
Therefore, protection of human health and the environment would not be achieved under the
No Action alternative.
Compliance with ARARs - Under this alternative, there are no ARARs with which to comply
per CERCLA § 121(d). ARARs are triggered by an action and are, therefore, not pertinent if
no cleanup occurs.
Short-Term Effectiveness - Alternative 1 has no action, so no short-term risks would exist for
the community or workers from construction activities. However, threats to human and
ecological receptors would persist in the short term. Because no construction activities would
occur, no additional energy use, greenhouse gas emissions, water use, waste and materials
management, and ecosystem protection requirements would be triggered. No additional traffic
volume or potential accidents and fatalities associated with construction would occur. While the
health risks would not be addressed, there is little exposure under current use conditions, so
short-term exposure risk is low.
Long-Term Effectiveness and Permanence - The No Action alternative does not offer any
long-term effectiveness and permanence in reducing potential risks to human and ecological
receptors. No controls or long-term measures would be implemented to control COCs or COECs
at the site other than routine maintenance consisting of erosion and stormwater control,
vegetation maintenance, and site cover and existing fencing repair.
This alternative would not provide control through treatment of soils with concentrations of
Ra-226 above the action level or reduce volume or mobility of contaminants. The resultant risks
associated with the No Action alternative would be similar to those that existed at the time of the
RSE field investigations with no increased protection of human health and the environment.
This alternative would not alter the potential exposure to or transport of contaminated soils from
the Quivira Mines. Surface water discharge from the site to both Unnamed Arroyo #2 and the
Pipeline Canyon Arroyo would have continued potential to transport contaminated soils to the
downstream watershed. Nearby residents would continue to be potentially exposed to wind- and
water-borne contaminants. Domestic livestock and their owners and caretakers would potentially
be exposed to surface soil contamination through direct contact and dust inhalation.
Reduction of Toxicity, Mobility, or Volume through Treatment - Alternative 1 employs
no treatment, so no reductions in toxicity, mobility, or volume through active treatment
would occur.
4.3.5.2 Implementability
Technical Feasibility and Availability of Services and Materials - Alternative 1 is readily
implementable because no construction is involved. This alternative would not impact the ability
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
81
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
to conduct removal or remedial actions in the future. No services or materials would be needed
to implement Alternative 1.
Administrative Feasibility - Alternative 1 is administratively feasible as taking no action
is feasible.
4.3.5.3 Costs
No removal action costs would be incurred for Alternative 1 as it involves no removal activities
and no legal or administrative activities.
4.3.6 Alternative 2: Consolidate and Cap All Waste On Site
Alternative 2 assumes that contaminated soils with concentrations above the action levels
would be excavated, hauled up to 3 miles, and consolidated in an onsite repository at or near
CR-1, including a canyon repository. An estimated 57,140 truckloads of waste (90 truckloads per
day) would be transported to the onsite repository using on-highway haul trucks holding 22 cubic
yards (33 tons) of waste.
4.3.6.1 Effectiveness
Overall Protection of Public Health and the Environment - Alternative 2 is protective of
human health and the environment as the contaminated soils exceeding the action level at CR-1,
CR-1E, and the Kerr-McGee Ponds would be consolidated and covered at an onsite repository.
The capped area would be covered with a soil ET cap. The engineered cap is a physical barrier
that offers protection from water infiltration and percolation into the contaminated soils, protects
groundwater resources, and provides adequate shielding from ionizing radiation to protect human
health and the environment. The cover would prevent direct contact between the wastes and the
public or the environment. Proper construction and design of the cover includes the
establishment of vegetation, which reduces erosion. Proper stormwater controls and maintenance
of the cover would prevent release of the contaminated soils back into the environment. A
100-year maintenance period is used for onsite capping alternative cost estimating and
comparison purposes. Additional maintenance costs beyond 100 years will depend on inspection
results and updates to the long-term surveillance plan.
Compliance with ARARs - Alternative 2 would meet federal, state, and Navajo Nation ARARs
for the Quivira Mines. Common ARARs for Alternative 2 are found in Table 6.
Short-Term Effectiveness - The primary considerations for short-term effectiveness are
protection of the community, workers, and environment during and shortly after implementation.
Alternative 2 involves excavating, loading haul trucks, and hauling waste between CR-1, CR-1E,
the Kerr-McGee Ponds, and an onsite repository; consolidation and capping of waste; importing
backfill soil; and restoring the lease areas.
• Protection of the Community during Removal Action - Under Alternative 2, a
preselected USEPA contractor would perform the removal action. Most construction
work will be at CR-1, CR-1E, and the Kerr-McGee Ponds and at the selected repository
location. Impacts to the community are expected to be limited because waste would
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
82
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
remain local, limiting hauling through the community. Construction will create noise and
some dust. Dust control measures, such as water spraying, would be used during
excavation, repository construction, waste compaction, and capping of the waste.
However, some dust generation is unavoidable. Air monitors would be placed around the
construction zone at the site and repositories to measure potential risks to the community.
Trucks hauling equipment and supplies would also add noise. However, the trucks would
be routed east of the Quivira Mines to Pipeline Canyon Road and then onto temporary
access road to CR-1 to the east of the residences on Red Water Pond Road.
This alternative disturbs a large amount of waste because of excavation and
consolidation, requires hauling a portion of soils on roads shared by nearby communities,
and has up to a 4-year duration. Haul trucks hauling the waste between lease areas would
be covered if they pass through the community. Truck traffic would be coordinated under
a transportation plan for routes, times of operation, and onsite traffic rules. Attempts
would be made to minimize trucking across Navajo Nation roadways. Emergency spill
containment and cleanup contingencies would be included in the transportation plan to
address material spills. Alternative 2 is estimated to require 691,290 miles of hauling
over 4 years, which would result in a 22.4 percent increase in (or 0.23 additional) traffic
accidents and 1.04 percent increase in (or 0.01 additional) traffic fatalities (Appendix D,
Table D-2).
• Protection of Workers - All removal actions would be performed by a
USEPA-contracted construction company prequalified to remediate uranium mine waste.
Onsite workers would require standard 40-hour Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA) hazardous materials training and radiation awareness training
and would be adequately protected by using appropriate personal protective equipment
and following safe work practices and standards. Radiation exposure monitoring would
be required. Short-term impacts to air quality in the surrounding environment may occur
during excavation and loading of waste for offsite transport. Dust suppression and
monitoring would be required to reduce worker exposure to or inhalation of radionuclides
in particulates. Decontamination of workers and equipment would be required before
exiting the site.
Under Alternative 2, heavy equipment would be used to clear and grub, excavate,
transfer, load, and transport waste to the onsite repository; consolidate waste and
construction a cap on the onsite repository; and reclaim the site by grading the footprints
of the removal areas, applying growth media, and applying native seed and soil
amendments for local vegetation establishment. Potential exposure and protection
procedures for workers engaged in these activities would be addressed in a site safety and
health plan. During excavation and material handling activities, measures would be taken
to reduce fugitive dust emissions and associated impacts to workers. Water would be
imported for dust control, and workers in the controlled area would use appropriate safety
equipment and implement safety practices such as air monitoring. Work areas would be
secured (for example, marked or fenced) for access by authorized personnel only.
Short-term risks of physical injury would exist for site workers during construction,
primarily related to operating equipment during access road construction, waste
excavation, site restoration, and repository construction. All workers would be required to
wear personal dosimeters to ensure that exposure does not exceed OSHA limits.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
83
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
• Environmental Impacts - Even with control measures, short-term environmental
impacts could occur from excavation and placement of waste in an onsite repository.
These environmental impacts may include sedimentation of local drainages, residual
track-in and track-out effects of soil and mud, noise, disturbed vegetation, and dust
generation. Other environmental impacts include fuel burning and releasing of emissions
that would lead to climate impacts. The threat to the environment is low because the
waste rock hauling would be a short distance and consolidation and capping would occur
within 4 years in comparison to hauling off site over a 4.5- to 18-year time frame
(Alternatives 3 and 4). In addition, revegetation would expedite the return of native flora
once cleanup actions are complete. However, revegetation may not occur immediately.
The short-term threat posed by exposure to uranium and radionuclides would be minimal.
• Environmental Metrics Analysis - A qualitative evaluation of all environmental metrics
was conducted. The results are presented in Appendix D, Table D-l. Alternative 2 has an
overall moderate greenness score of 28 out of 48 (where a higher number is good). Fuel
consumption and greenhouse gas emissions were also quantitatively evaluated for
Alternative 2, where onsite hauling, material import, and water import is estimated to
consume 120,290 gallons of fuel and generate 1,200 metric tons of greenhouse gas
(CChe) emissions over 697,680 miles travelled (Appendix D, Table D-2).
• Time Until Removal Action Objectives Are Achieved - The time period to implement
Alternative 2 is estimated to be 4 years following 1-2 years of design, bidding, planning,
and permitting. Construction may be extended depending on schedule-limiting factors
such as monsoon rains and snowfall.
Long-Term Effectiveness and Permanence - Alternative 2 is effective over the long term. The
cover for Alternative 2 would be an engineered ET cap. Landfills and mines in the southwestern
U.S. are routinely closed on site with ET caps and a maintenance plan. The Navajo Nation
Abandoned Mine Lands Reclamation Department (NAMLRD) has a demonstration repository in
the Tse Tah area, and Tetra Tech (2021) has prepared a white paper that provides additional
support for the use of ET caps. Cover maintenance is a well-established practice. Since
contaminated soils would remain on the site, potential exposure reductions to those accessing the
site would be dependent on the maintenance of the cover. Drainage features and stormwater
controls would be included in the design so that surface water would be diverted from the capped
areas and aid in prolonging the integrity of the cover. Alternative 2 is expected to effectively
mitigate the long-term effects on potential human and ecological receptors for as long as the
cover and permanent fencing and signage are maintained. A gate would be installed to provide
access for periodic rotational grazing on the cap. An engineered ET cap would meet the RAOs
and ARARs and be protective of human health and the environment for at least 200 years.
Reduction of Toxicity, Mobility, or Volume through Treatment- Alternative 2 employs
no treatment, so no reductions in toxicity, mobility, or volume through active treatment
would occur.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
84
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
4.3.6.2 Implementability
Technical Feasibility and Availability of Services and Materials- Alternative 2 would use
conventional techniques, materials, and labor for the excavation and associated activities.
The Quivira Mines are readily accessible. Excavation would be scheduled and performed to
maximize direct loading and promote worker and public safety. Engineering controls for
fugitive dust and site monitoring would be used to minimize exposure of sensitive receptors
to radioisotopes.
Alternative 2 consists mainly of simple earthwork and material hauling and repository cap
construction. Construction and environmental monitoring equipment and services are all readily
available. Labor would be available both on the Navajo Nation and in the regional market.
Access to approximately 24 million gallons of water for dust suppression, waste compaction, and
cover and backfill compaction is necessary, which would be obtained through construction of an
onsite water well or trucked in from the Gallup municipal supply. Sources of borrow material are
enough to meet the needs for fill, topsoil, and gravel for capping options under all potential cap
designs and for restoration after excavation. Some specialized labor for adit and shaft closure
after excavation may be required depending on if these features are discovered during
construction and their condition.
Alternative 2 would be completed as a single phase, and no future removal actions are
anticipated. Maintenance of the repository cap would be required for up to a 100-year period and
reevaluated thereafter. The expertise and equipment needed for long-term monitoring and
maintenance of the repository cap, erosional features and controls, and revegetation are
available. Run-on water control berms and drainage ditches at the repository would be repaired
as necessary. Permanent range fencing and warning signs around the repository would also be
checked and repaired or replaced as necessary.
Administrative Feasibility - Alternative 2 is administratively implementable and would require
coordination between USEPA, NNEPA, UNC, NAMLRD, the Navajo Nation Department of
Water Resources (NNDWR), the Navajo Nation Minerals Department (NNMD), and the
Coyote Canyon, Pinedale, and Standing Rock Chapters to address federal and Navajo ARARs.
The contaminated soils would be transported within CR-1 for consolidation and from the
Kerr-McGee Ponds and CR-1E to CR-1. Construction of an engineered cover at an onsite
repository would not require permitting because of the Bevill Amendment exemption and the
contaminated soils are considered LLRW and not RCRA hazardous waste. In addition, permits
are not required for onsite CERCLA actions. Onsite CERCLA actions must comply with the
substantive requirements of any Navajo local permit but not with the administrative
requirements. Community and stakeholder engagement may be significant because the waste
would remain on the Navajo Nation. Negotiations with the Navajo Nation or other landowners
with potential offsite soil borrow sources would need to be conducted and agreements crafted.
4.3.6.3 Costs
The total cost is estimated to be $61.6 million or $62 per bank cubic yard for Alternative 2
(Appendix E, Table E-l through Table E-2). This cost assumes that maintenance of the ET cap
would be required in perpetuity but, for cost estimating purposes, was assumed to include cap
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
85
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
inspections, erosion repairs, and revegetation for 30 years and cap inspections for up to
100 years. USEPA would be responsible for the long-term maintenance of the repository.
Restoration maintenance at the Quivira Mines would consist of 10 years of erosion repairs and
inspections and up to 30 years of vegetation surveys and maintenance of revegetation efforts. A
breakdown of the major cost categories associated with implementing Alternative 2 is presented
in Exhibit 16.
Exhibit 16. Alternative 2 Cost Breakdown
Cost Component
Alternative 2
Estimated Excavated Surface Area (Acres)
62.9
Estimated Excavated Volume (Bank Cubic Yards)
1,005,500
Estimated Excavated Volume (Loose Cubic Yards)
1,256,875
Direct Capital Costs
Field Overhead and Oversight
$6,608,000
General Site Work
$156,000
Earthwork
$19,326,000
Transportation and Consolidation
$19,756,000
Subtotal Direct Capital Costs
$45,847,000
Indirect Capital Costs
$6,274,000
Subtotal Capital Costs
$52,121,000
Capital Cost Contingency (15%)
$7,758,150
Total Capital Costs
$59,879,000
Maintenance Costs
Present Worth of 10, 30, and 100 Years of Maintenance (Depending on
Activity) at a Discount Rate of 7%
$1,377,000
Contingency Allowance (25%)
$344,300
Total Present Worth Maintenance Cost
$1,721,000
Total Cost
$61,600,000
4.3.7 Alternative 3: Dispose of All Mine Waste Off Site at Red Rocks Disposal Facility
Alternative 3 assumes that contaminated soils with concentrations above the action levels would
be excavated and transported 44 miles to the Red Rocks state-permitted disposal facility in
McKinley County, New Mexico. The 44-mile recommended haul route for the waste is assumed
to be Pipeline Canyon Road to Highway 566 to Interstate 40 and then Interstate 40 from
Church Rock to Thoreau and the facility (Figure 37). An estimated 76,180 truckloads of waste
(96 truckloads per day) would be transported to the Red Rocks disposal facility using
on-highway haul trucks holding 16.5 cubic yards (25 tons) of waste. Waste would be transported
on the recommended haul route: south on State Highway 566 to Interstate 40, exiting
Interstate 40 at Thoreau, and north on State Highway 371 to the Red Rocks disposal facility.
Further discussion of the evaluation of haul routes is provided in Section 4.1.2 and Tetra Tech
(2024). Exhibit 17 presents the processing and transportation costs for the Red Rocks disposal
facility. The facility is currently a RCRA D landfill and is not licensed to accept uranium mine
waste. However, the facility has additional adjacent land where a State of New Mexico permit
for a new facility that can accept uranium mine waste for permanent disposal is planned. The
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
86
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
State of New Mexico is not opposed to the facility development and has provided guidance on
how such a facility would be permitted. US ACE (2022) evaluated the operations of the facility in
a Stennett analysis and determined that, under the operating conditions assumed, the facility
would be safe for workers.
Exhibit 17. Red Rocks Transportation and Tipping Costs
Receiving Facility
Processing and Transportation Costs
Red Rocks Disposal Facility
$95.40 per loose cubic yard*
Note:
* Exact costs have not been obtained for the Red Rocks disposal facility yet. This placeholder cost is for the
Red Rocks disposal facility and will be updated with information from the facility when available.
4.3.7.1 Effectiveness
Overall Protection of Public Health and the Environment - Alternative 3 would protect
human health and the environment as the contaminated soils exceeding the action level at the
Quivira Mines would be excavated for offsite transportation and disposal at the Red Rocks
disposal facility, a permitted facility designed to manage radioactive waste. This alternative
would significantly minimize potential long-term exposure to contaminated soils from the
Quivira Mines. Potential short-term exposures during excavation, transport, and at the final
disposal site would be managed through engineering controls.
From a contaminant exposure perspective, Alternative 3 is protective of human health and the
environment. However, highway fatality calculations indicate shipping soils to the Red Rocks
disposal facility for disposal would result in an increase of a highway traffic accidents. This is
discussed further in the evaluation of short-term effectiveness.
Compliance with ARARs - Alternative 3 would meet federal, state, and Navajo Nation ARARs
for the Quivira Mines. Common ARARs across Alternatives 2 through 4 are found in Table 6.
Short-Term Effectiveness - Under Alternative 3 all waste would be excavated, loaded into haul
trucks, transported, and disposed of off site at the Red Rocks disposal facility. The short-term
impacts to the community, workers, and environment under Alternative 3 are as described below.
• Protection of the Community during Removal Action - Under this alternative, a
preselected USEPA contractor would perform the removal action. Most construction
work will be at CR-1, CR-1E, and the Kerr-McGee Ponds. Impacts to the community
would include noise and some dust. Dust control measures, such as water spraying,
would be used during waste excavation and loading for offsite transport. However, some
dust generation is unavoidable. Air monitors would be placed around the construction
zone to measure potential risks to the community. Trucks hauling equipment and supplies
would also add noise. Traffic will be routed around the communities to the maximum
extent possible but construction traffic will mix with community traffic on Pipeline
Canyon Road, State Road 566,1-40, and through Thoreau to the facility. However, the
trucks would be routed east of the Quivira Mines to Pipeline Canyon Road and then onto
the State Road 566 to avoid the residences on Red Water Pond Road. This alternative
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
87
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
also leaves the waste in place for the 3 to 5 years of state permitting, design, and
facility construction.
This alternative excavates all of the waste, requires hauling all of the waste through
communities and on highways, and has the second longest overall duration (4.5 years).
Bulk carriers hauling the containerized wastes off site would be covered, secured, and
weighed to document compliance with total and axle load limits. Truck traffic would be
coordinated under a transportation plan for routes, times of operation, and onsite traffic
rules. Emergency spill containment and cleanup contingencies would also be included in
the transportation plan. Alternative 3 is estimated to require 7.1 million miles of hauling
over approximately 4.5 years (depending on fleet size), resulting in a 229 percent
increase in (or 2.3 additional) traffic accidents and an 10.7 percent increase in (or
0.11 additional) traffic fatalities (Appendix D, Table D-2).
• Protection of Workers during Removal Action - All removal actions would be
performed by an EPA-contracted construction company pre-qualified to remediate
uranium mine waste. Onsite workers would require standard 40-hour OSHA hazardous
materials training and radiation awareness training and would be adequately protected by
using appropriate personal protective equipment and following safe work practices and
standards. Radiation exposure monitoring would be required. Short-term impacts to air
quality in the surrounding environment may occur during excavation and loading of
waste for offsite transport. Dust suppression and monitoring would be required to ensure
that workers are not exposed to or inhale radionuclides in particulates. Decontamination
of workers and equipment would be required before exiting the site.
Under Alternative 3, heavy equipment would be used to clear and grub, excavate,
transfer, load, and transport waste to a facility, as well as reclaim the site by grading the
footprints of the removal areas, applying growth media, and applying native seed and soil
amendments for local vegetation establishment. Potential exposure and protection
procedures for workers engaged in these activities would be addressed in a site safety and
health plan. During excavation and material handling activities, measures would be taken
to reduce fugitive dust emissions and associated impacts to workers. Water would be
imported for dust control, and workers in the controlled area would use appropriate safety
equipment and implement safety practices such as air monitoring. Work areas would be
secured (for example, marked or fenced) to ensure access by authorized personnel only.
Short-term risks of physical injury would exist for site workers during construction,
primarily related to operating equipment during access road construction, waste
excavation, site restoration, and repository construction. All workers would be required to
wear personal dosimeters to ensure that exposure does not exceed OSHA limits.
• Environmental Impacts - Even with control measures, short-term environmental
impacts could occur from excavation, hauling, and placement of waste in an offsite
repository. These environmental impacts may include residual track-in and track-out
effects of soil and mud, noise, disturbed vegetation, and dust generation. Other
environmental impacts include additional fuel burning and releasing of emissions that
would lead to increased climate impacts. However, the threat to the environment is
moderate because the waste rock could be hauled off site over a 5-year time frame in
comparison to a 17- to 18-year time frame for Alternative 4. In addition, revegetation
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
88
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
would expedite the return of native flora once cleanup actions are complete. However,
revegetation may not occur immediately. The short-term threat posed by exposure to
uranium and radionuclides would be minimal.
• Environmental Metrics Analysis - A qualitative evaluation of all environmental metrics
was conducted. The results are presented in Appendix D, Table D-l. Alternative 3 has an
overall moderate greenness score of 21 out of 48 (where a higher number is good). Fuel
consumption and greenhouse gas emissions were also quantitatively evaluated for
Alternative 3, where offsite hauling, fill material import, and water import is estimated to
consume 1,226,462 gallons of fuel and generate 12,600 metric tons of greenhouse gas
(CChe) emissions over 7.1 million miles travelled (Appendix D, Table D-2).
• Time until Removal Action Objectives Are Achieved - Excavation, hauling
off-Navajo Nation, and disposal of waste at the Red Rocks disposal facility would meet
preliminary RAOs in the short term. The construction time required to achieve RAOs
for Alternative 3 would be approximately 4.5 years. Construction may be extended
depending on schedule-limiting factors such as truck availability, monsoon rains,
and snowfall.
Long-Term Effectiveness and Permanence - Since all contaminated soils would be excavated
and removed from the site, potential exposure reductions to receptors accessing the site would
be permanent. Long-term maintenance is low under this alternative because it focuses on
native vegetation re-establishment only and does not require repository maintenance.
Alternative 3 is expected to effectively mitigate the long-term effects on potential onsite
human and ecological receptors.
Reduction of Toxicity, Mobility, or Volume through Treatment - Alternative 3 employs
no treatment, so no reductions in toxicity, mobility, or volume through active treatment
would occur.
Managing waste at landfills reduces the overall mobility of bulk waste but does not treat the
waste. Alternative 3 does not reduce contaminant toxicity, mobility, or volume through
treatment. Under Alternative 3, waste would be disposed of at the Red Rocks disposal facility
near Gallup, New Mexico, which is or would be permitted for uranium mine waste disposal.
4.3.7.2 Implemen tability
Technical Feasibility and Availability of Services and Materials - Alternative 3 is technically
feasible and would use conventional techniques, materials, and labor for the excavation and
associated activities. The Quivira Mines is readily accessible. Excavation would be scheduled
and performed to maximize direct loading and ensure worker and public safety. Engineering
controls for fugitive dust and site monitoring would be used to control potential exposures to
sensitive receptors. Profiling and manifesting of the material would be done in coordination with
the transporters and the offsite disposal facility. Some specialized labor for adit and shaft closure
after excavation may be required depending on if these features are discovered during
construction and what their condition is.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
89
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
Alternative 3 consists mainly of simple earthwork and material hauling. Construction and
environmental monitoring equipment and services are all readily available. Labor would be
available both on the Navajo Nation and in the regional market. Access to approximately
27 million gallons of water for dust suppression and compaction of backfill is necessary, which
would be obtained through construction of an onsite water well or trucked in from the Gallup
municipal supply. Sources of borrow material near the site are adequate to meet the needs for fill
and topsoil for restoration after excavation.
Alternative 3 would be completed as a single phase, and no future removal actions are
anticipated. Maintenance of site restoration erosional controls and revegetation efforts would
be required. Run-on water control berms, drainage ditches, and sediment detention basins
would be repaired, as necessary. Temporary range fencing would also be checked and repaired,
as necessary.
The Red Rocks disposal facility does not currently have an operating permit. Because all waste
would be disposed of off site, reliance on the ability to obtain an operating permit and future
disposal capacity of the Red Rocks disposal facility brings some uncertainty to the availability of
services at the time of the removal action. However, the State has indicated how the facility
could be permitted and estimates a time frame for permitting of 1 to 2 years. However, an overall
3- to 5-year time frame is estimated for permitting and facility design.
Administrative Feasibility - Alternative 3 is administratively implementable and would require
coordination between USEPA, NNEPA, UNC, NAMLRD, NNDWR, NNMD, and the Coyote
Canyon, Pinedale, and Standing Rock Chapters to address federal and Navajo ARARs, but
federal permits for onsite actions under CERCLA are not required. This alternative would also
require the Red Rocks disposal facility to successfully obtain a groundwater discharge permit
from the State of New Mexico and develop the transportation, operation, and closure plans.
Finally, negotiations with the Navajo Nation or other landowners with potential offsite soil
borrow sources would need to be conducted and agreements crafted.
Alternative 3 is administratively feasible. It would require State of New Mexico to issue a
groundwater discharge permit to facilitate uranium mine waste disposal at the facility. The
permitting options were identified by the State, and they estimated the permit process, which
includes a public comment period, would take 1 to 2 years. However, an overall 3- to 5-year time
frame is estimated for permitting and facility design.
4.3.7.3 Costs
The total cost for Alternative 3 is estimated to be $182.5 million or $182 per bank cubic yard
(Appendix E, Table E-3 and Table E-4). This cost assumes the Red Rocks disposal facility
would be responsible for the long-term maintenance of the wastes it receives. Restoration
maintenance at the Quivira Mines would consist of 10 years of erosion repairs and inspections
and 30 years of vegetation surveys and maintenance of revegetation efforts. A breakdown of the
major cost categories associated with implementing Alternative 3 for the Quivira Mines is
presented in Exhibit 18.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
90
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
Exhibit 18. Alternative 3 Cost Breakdown
Cost Component
Alternative 3
Estimated Excavated Surface Area (Acres)
62.9
Estimated Excavated Volume (Bank Cubic Yards)
1,005,500
Estimated Excavated Volume (Loose Cubic Yards)
1,256,875
Direct Capital Costs
Field Overhead and Oversight
$7,552,000
General Site Work
$156,000
Earthwork
$14,626,000
Transportation and Disposal
$126,180,000
Subtotal Direct Capital Costs
$148,515,000
Indirect Capital Costs
$8,965,000
Subtotal Capital Costs
$157,480,000
Capital Cost Contingency (15%)
$23,622,000
Total Capital Costs
$181,102,000
Maintenance Costs
Present Worth of 10 and 30 Years of Maintenance (Depending on
Activity) at a Discount Rate of 7%
$1,148,000
Contingency Allowance (25%)
$287,000
Total Present Worth Maintenance Cost
$1,435,000
Total Cost
$182,537,000
4.3.8 Alternative 4: Dispose of All Mine Waste Off Site at a Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act C or Low-Level Radioactive Waste Facility
Alternative 4 assumes that contaminated soils with concentrations above the action levels would
be excavated and disposed of at a RCRA C and State of Colorado radiological licensed facility,
such as the Clean Harbors facility in Deer Trail, Colorado, or an NRC-licensed LLRW facility,
such as the WCS in Andrews, Texas. Disposal at the WCS LLRW facility in Andrews, Texas,
may be considered where Ra-226 concentration in waste or contaminated soil exceeds 222 pCi/g,
or the annual acceptance limit at the Clean Harbors facility is reached. An estimated
76,180 truckloads of waste (25 truckloads per day) would be transported to the Clean Harbors or
WCS facilities using on-highway haul trucks holding 16.5 cubic yards (25 tons) of waste. Waste
would be transported on the recommended haul route: south on State Highway 566 to
Interstate 40, east to Interstate 25, north on Interstate 25, northeast on State Highway 24, and
north on State Highway 71 to Deer Trail. Further discussion of the evaluation of haul routes is
provided in Section 4.1.2 and Tetra Tech (2024).
Exhibit 19 presents the processing and transportation costs for the Clean Harbors and WCS
facilities. The Deer Trail facility currently has the appropriate permitting, licensing, bonding, and
CERCLA Off-Site Rule approvals. For the purposes of the detailed and comparative analysis of
this alternative, all mine waste will be disposed of at the Deer Trail facility because of lower
transportation and tipping costs. A change to the disposal facility, such as the WCS facility in
Andrews, Texas, could be selected in the action memorandum, if necessary, to address volume
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
91
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
and concentration limits at the Deer Trail facility. The 625-mile recommended haul route for the
waste to the Deer Trail facility is assumed to be Pipeline Canyon Road to Highway 566 to
Interstate 40 to Interstate 25 to Highway 24 to Highway 71 and the Deer Trail facility
(Figure 39) while the recommended 501-mile haul route to the WCS facility is assumed to be
Pipeline Canyon Road to Highway 566 to Interstate 40 to Highway 285 to Highway 62 to
Highway 176 and the WCS facility (Figure 40).
Exhibit 19. Disposal Facility Transportation and Tipping Costs
Receiving Facility
Transportation and Tipping Costs
Clean Harbors RCRA C Deer Trail facility
$285 per loose cubic yard
Waste Control Specialist LLRW facility
$375 per loose cubic yard
Notes:
LLRW Low-level radioactive waste
RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
4.3.8.1 Effectiveness
Overall Protection of Public Health and the Environment - Alternative 4 would protect
human health and the environment as the contaminated soils exceeding the action level at the
Quivira Mines would be excavated and removed for offsite transportation and disposal at a
permitted and licensed facility designed to manage radioactive waste. This alternative would
significantly minimize potential long-term exposure to contaminated soils from the Quivira
Mines. Potential short-term exposures during excavation, transport, and disposal would be
managed through engineering controls.
From a contaminant exposure perspective, Alternative 4 is protective of human health and the
environment. However, highway fatality calculations indicate shipping soils to Deer Trail for
disposal would result in a large increase in highway traffic accidents and fatalities. This is
discussed further in the evaluation of short-term effectiveness.
Compliance with ARARs - Alternative 4 would meet federal, state, and Navajo Nation ARARs
for the Quivira Mines. Common ARARs across Alternatives 2 through 4 are found in Table 6.
Short-Term Effectiveness - Under Alternative 4 all waste would be excavated, loaded into haul
trucks, transported, and disposed of off site. The short-term impacts to the community, workers,
and environment under Alternative 4 are as described below.
• Protection of the Community during Removal Action - Under this alternative, a
preselected USEPA contractor would perform the removal action. Most construction
work will be at CR-1, CR-1E, and the Kerr-McGee Ponds. Impacts to the community
would include noise and some dust. This is expected to be more disturbance than either
Alternative 2 or 3 because of the significantly longer duration (17 to 18 years) of this
action. Dust control measures, such as water spraying, would be used during waste
excavation and loading for offsite transport. However, some dust generation is
unavoidable. Air monitors would be placed around the construction zone to measure
potential risks to the community. Trucks hauling equipment and supplies would also add
noise. Traffic will be routed around the communities to the maximum extent possible but
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
92
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
for 17 to 18 years construction traffic will mix with community traffic on Pipeline
Canyon Road, State Road 566, and the interstate highways taken to the facility. However,
the trucks would be routed east of the Quivira Mines to Pipeline Canyon Road and then
onto the State Road 566 to avoid the residences on Red Water Pond Road.
This alternative excavates all of the waste, requires hauling all of the waste through
communities and on highways, and has the longest overall duration because of the
hauling distance. Bulk carriers hauling the containerized wastes off site would be
covered, secured, and weighed to document compliance with total and axle load limits.
Truck traffic would be coordinated under a transportation plan for routes, times of
operation, and onsite traffic rules. Emergency spill containment and cleanup
contingencies would also be included in the transportation plan. Alternative 4 is
estimated to require 97 million miles of hauling over 17 to 18 years (depending on fleet
size), resulting in a 3,120 percent increase in (or 31.2 additional) traffic accidents and a
146 percent increase in (or 1.46 additional) traffic fatalities (Appendix D, Table D-2).
• Protection of Workers during Removal Action - All removal actions would be
performed by an EPA-contracted construction company pre-qualified to remediate
LLRW. Onsite workers would require standard 40-hour OSHA hazardous materials
training and radiation awareness training and would be adequately protected by using
appropriate personal protective equipment and following safe work practices and
standards. Radiation exposure monitoring would be required. Short-term impacts to air
quality in the surrounding environment may occur during excavation and loading of
waste for offsite transport. Dust suppression and monitoring would be required to ensure
that workers are not exposed to or inhale radionuclides in particulates. Decontamination
of workers and equipment would be required before exiting the site.
Under Alternative 4, heavy equipment would be used to clear and grub, excavate,
transfer, load, and transport waste to a facility, as well as reclaim the site by grading the
footprints of the removal areas, applying growth media, and applying native seed and soil
amendments for local vegetation establishment. Potential exposure and protection
procedures for workers engaged in these activities would be addressed in a site safety and
health plan. During excavation and material handling activities, measures would be taken
to reduce fugitive dust emissions and associated impacts to workers. Water would be
imported for dust control, and workers in the controlled area would use appropriate safety
equipment and implement safety practices such as air monitoring. Work areas would be
secured (for example, marked or fenced) to ensure access by authorized personnel only.
Short-term risks of physical injury would exist for site workers during construction,
primarily related to operating equipment during access road construction, waste
excavation, site restoration, and repository construction. All workers would be required to
wear personal dosimeters to ensure that exposure does not exceed OSHA limits.
• Environmental Impacts - Even with control measures, short-term environmental
impacts could occur from excavation, hauling, and placement of waste in an offsite
repository. These environmental impacts may include residual track-in and track-out
effects of soil and mud, noise, disturbed vegetation, and dust generation. Other
environmental impacts include a very high rate of fuel burning and releasing of emissions
from long distance hauling that would lead to very large climate impacts. The threat to
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
93
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
the environment is very high because the waste rock would take 4 times as long to haul
off site to Deer Trail, Colorado (17 to 18 years) than it would take to haul to Red Rocks
disposal facility (4.5 years) under Alternative 3. In addition, revegetation would expedite
the return of native flora once cleanup actions are complete. However, revegetation may
not occur immediately. The short-term threat posed by exposure to uranium and
radionuclides would be minimal.
• Environmental Metrics Analysis - A qualitative evaluation of all environmental metrics
was conducted. The results are presented in Appendix D, Table D-l. Alternative 4 has an
overall low greenness score of 11 out of 48 (where a higher number is good). Fuel
consumption and greenhouse gas emissions were also quantitatively evaluated for
Alternative 4, where offsite hauling and material import is estimated to consume
16.7 million gallons of fuel and generate 172,100 metric tons of greenhouse gas (CChe)
emissions over 97 million miles travelled (Appendix D, Table D-2).
• Time until Removal Action Objectives Are Achieved - Excavation, hauling
off-Navajo Nation, and disposal of waste at the Deer Trail disposal facility would meet
preliminary RAOs in the short term. The construction time required to achieve RAOs for
Alternative 4 would be approximately 17 to 18 years based on the 625-mile distance to
the disposal facility, the 3-day turnaround time between the site and the disposal facility,
and likely limited availability of trucks for transportation. If additional haul trucks can be
dedicated to the project (more than 25 trucks a day), then the project duration can be
decreased up to the maximum number of trucks that can be loaded per day. Construction
may be extended depending on schedule-limiting factors such as truck availability,
monsoon rains, and snowfall.
Long-Term Effectiveness and Permanence -Since all contaminated soils would be excavated
and removed from the site, potential exposure reductions to receptors accessing the site would
be permanent. Long-term maintenance is low under this alternative because it focuses on
native vegetation re-establishment only and does not require repository maintenance.
Alternative 4 is expected to effectively mitigate the long-term effects on potential onsite
human and ecological receptors.
Reduction of Toxicity, Mobility, or Volume through Treatment - Alternative 4 employs
no treatment, so no reductions in toxicity, mobility, or volume through active treatment
would occur.
Managing waste at landfills reduces the overall mobility of bulk waste but does not treat the
waste. Alternative 4 does not reduce contaminant toxicity, mobility, or volume through
treatment. Under Alternative 4, waste would be disposed of at RCRA C facility in Deer Trail,
Colorado, which is licensed to accept uranium mine waste.
4.3.8.2 Implementability
Technical Feasibility and Availability of Services and Materials - Alternative 4 is technically
feasible because it would use conventional techniques, materials, and labor for the excavation
and associated activities. The Quivira Mines is readily accessible. Excavation would be
scheduled and performed to maximize direct loading and ensure worker and public safety.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
94
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
Engineering controls for fugitive dust and site monitoring would be used to control potential
exposures to sensitive receptors. Profiling and manifesting of the material would be done in
coordination with the transporters and the offsite landfill. Some specialized labor for adit and
shaft closure after excavation may be required depending on if these features are discovered
during construction and what their condition is.
Alternative 4 consists mainly of simple earthwork and material hauling. Construction and
environmental monitoring equipment and services are all readily available. Labor would be
available both on the Navajo Nation and in the regional market. Access to approximately
99 million gallons of water for dust suppression and backfill compaction is necessary, which
would be obtained through construction of an onsite water well or trucked in from the Gallup
municipal water supply. Sources of borrow material near the site are adequate to meet the needs
for fill and topsoil for restoration after excavation.
Alternative 4 would be completed as a single phase, and no future removal actions are
anticipated. Maintenance of site restoration erosional controls and revegetation efforts would
be required. Run-on water control berms, drainage ditches, and sediment detention basins
would be repaired, as necessary. Temporary range fencing would also be checked and repaired,
as necessary.
The disposal of waste at the Deer Trail hazardous waste landfill has a haul distance of 625 miles,
resulting in a 3-day turnaround time for haul trucks and construction over a 17- to 18-year
period, at least 4 times as long as Alternative 3. The Deer Trail facility is currently in compliance
with their operating permits and with the CERCLA Off-Site Rule. Because all waste would be
disposed of off site, reliance on the disposal capacity of the Deer Trail facility brings uncertainty
to the availability of services at the time of and throughout the 17- to 18-year duration of the
removal action. A change to the disposal facility could be selected in the action memorandum
if necessary.
Administrative Feasibility - Alternative 4 is administratively implementable and would require
coordination between USEPA, NNEPA, UNC, NAMLRD, NNDWR, NNMD, and the Coyote
Canyon, Pinedale, and Standing Rock Chapters to address federal and Navajo ARARs, but
federal permits for onsite actions under CERCLA are not required. Finally, negotiations with the
Navajo Nation or other landowners with potential offsite soil borrow sources would need to be
conducted and agreements crafted.
Alternative 4 is administratively feasible since shipping of waste (ore for reprocessing) is fairly
common and would only require scheduling and obtaining the necessary permits. All
contaminated soil is anticipated to be accepted by licensed facilities. Offsite disposal of
materials from a CERCLA site must comply with the CERCLA Off-Site Rule. The facility
identified to dispose of the waste has approval under the Off-Site Rule and would need to
maintain such approval.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
95
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
4.3.8.3 Costs
The total cost for Alternative 4 is estimated to be $563 million or $560 per bank cubic yard
(Appendix E, Table E-5 and Table E-6). This cost assumes the Clean Harbors RCRA C Deer
Trail facility would be responsible for the long-term maintenance of the wastes it receives.
Restoration maintenance at the Quivira Mines would consist of 10 years of erosion repairs and
inspections and 30 years of vegetation surveys and maintenance of revegetation efforts. A
breakdown of the major cost categories associated with implementing Alternative 4 is presented
in Exhibit 20.
Exhibit 20. Alternative 4 Cost Breakdown
Cost Component
Alternative 4
Estimated Excavated Surface Area (Acres)
62.9
Estimated Excavated Volume (Bank Cubic Yards)
1,005,500
Estimated Excavated Volume (Loose Cubic Yards)
1,256,875
Direct Capital Costs
Field Overhead and Oversight
$22,320,000
General Site Work
$156,000
Earthwork
$24,137,000
Transportation and Disposal
$382,304,300
Subtotal Direct Capital Costs
$428,917,000
Indirect Capital Costs
$59,389,000
Subtotal Capital Costs
$488,306,000
Capital Cost Contingency (15%)
$73,245,900
Total Capital Costs
$561,552,000
Maintenance Costs
Present Worth of 10 and 30 Years of Maintenance (Depending on
Activity) at a Discount Rate of 7%
$1,148,000
Contingency Allowance (25%)
$287,000
Total Present Worth Maintenance Cost
$1,435,000
Total Cost
$562,987,000
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
96
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
5.0 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE
J
This section presents the approach for the comparative analysis of alternatives and a summary of
the analysis. The comparative analysis includes the evaluation of the relative effectiveness,
implementability, and cost between alternatives. The comparative analysis ranks the three
criteria for each alternative qualitatively as very poor, poor, average, good, or very good.
5.1 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS APPROACH
The final step of this EE/CA is to conduct a comparative analysis of the removal action
alternatives. This analysis evaluates each alternative's strengths and weaknesses relative to the
other alternatives with respect to the three criteria and in achieving RAOs. An explanation of the
evaluation and ranking criteria is presented in Section 4.3.
5.2 SUMMARY OF COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
All alternatives except for Alternative 1 meet the threshold criterion of being protective of
public health and the environment. Exhibit 21 presents a comparative rating of alternatives.
Exhibit 21. Comparative Rating of Alternatives
Alternative
Attainment of
Threshold
Criteria3
Effectiveness
Implementability
Cost Rating
(Million)b
1
No Action
Fail
Short-Term: Average
Long-Term: Very Poor
Tech: Very Good
Admin: Very Good
Very Good
($0)
2
Consolidate and
Cap All Waste On
Site
Pass
Short-Term: Average
Long-Term: Good
Tech: Good
Admin: Good
Good
($61.6)
3
Dispose of All
Mine Waste Off
Site at Red Rocks
Disposal Facility
Pass
Short-Term: Average
Long-Term: Very Good
Tech: Very Good
Admin: Average
Poor
($182.5)
4
Dispose of All
Mine Waste Off
Site at a RCRA C
or LLRW Facility
Pass
Short-Term: Very Poor
Long-Term: Very Good
Tech: Very Good
Admin: Good
Very Poor
($563)
Notes:
a Threshold criteria are (a) overall protection and (b) compliance with applicable or relevant and appropriate
requirements.
b Estimated costs are net present value.
Admin Administrative feasibility
LLRW Low-level radioactive waste
RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Tech Technical feasibility
5.2.1 Effectiveness
Effectiveness comprises two threshold criteria (protection and compliance with ARARs) and
includes short- and long-term effectiveness and permanence of the remedy.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
97
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
5.2.1.1 Protection of Human Health and the Environment
All alternatives except for Alternative 1 are protective of public health and the environment.
5.2.1.2 Compliance with ARARs
All action alternatives would be performed in compliance with federal and Navajo ARARs
identified in Table 6.
5.2.1.3 Short-Term Effectiveness (during Removal Action)
Short-term effectiveness comprises four criteria: protection of the community and workers
during the removal action, environmental impacts, and time to meet RAOs. Overall short-term
effectiveness is rated Average for Alternative 1, Average for Alternative 2, Average for
Alternative 3, and Very Poor for Alternative 4.
Protection of the Community during Removal Action
The Alternative 2 haul route between lease areas is away from the community, would be in use
over a shorter duration (4 years), and is rated Good. Water would be used for dust suppression
on roads and speed would be limited to reduce dust generation and to minimize potential for
accidents. This alternative creates the least traffic and dust impacts to the community as truck
traffic would only be increased on the Pipeline Canyon Road to transport waste and construction
materials for onsite repository construction. No excavated waste would be hauled through the
community on Red Water Pond Road or on State Road 566. Lower haul miles through the
community would also result in fewer traffic accidents.
The Alternatives 3 and 4 haul routes from the lease areas are via temporary access roads to
Pipeline Canyon Road and then via State Road 566 towards Gallup, would be in use over
moderate (4.5 years) to very long (17 to 18 years) durations, would have the highest impact on
traffic, truck and dust emissions, and would have the moderate to very high likelihood of on-
highway traffic accidents and fatalities. Further discussion of the evaluation of haul routes is
provided in Section 4.1.2 and Tetra Tech (2024). Water would be used for dust suppression on
roads, loads would be covered, and speed would be limited to reduce dust generation and to
minimize potential for accidents. Therefore, Alternatives 3 and 4 are rated Average and
Very Poor because of the respective moderate to very long project durations and moderate to
very long round-trip distances to the disposal facilities. Extended project durations increase the
amount of water required for dust suppression. In addition, Alternative 3 leaves the waste in
place for 3 to 5 years before the Red Rocks disposal facility is permitted, designed, and
constructed, so the potential for exposure to mine waste exists for that duration. Because of the
very long time frame to move the waste, Alternative 4 would leave the waste in place onsite for a
longer time frame than Alternatives 2 and 3.
Estimated accidents and fatalities resulting from on- and offsite trucking of waste, import of
fill, and import of water are presented in Exhibit 22. Onsite disposal is safest from a traffic
perspective, followed by Alternative 3, and then Alternative 4. Alternative 4 has a very high
probability of a traffic fatality.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
98
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
Alternative 1 is rated Very Good as no removal activities would be conducted to impact
the community.
Exhibit 22. Potential Community and Worker Impacts
Removal
Alternatives
Water Import
(million
gallon)
Truckloads
and Miles
Traveled3
Project
Duration
Accident Risk
Fatality Risk
Alternative 1:
No Action
0
0
0
0
0
Alternative 2:
Consolidate and Cap
All Waste On Site
23.7
85,423
(0.69 million)
4 years
Low
(22.4% or
0.23 accident)
Low
(1.1% or
« 1 fatality)
Alternative 3:
Disposal of All Mine
Waste Off Site at Red
Rocks Disposal
Facility
26.7
101,182
(7.1 million)
4.5 years
Moderate
(229% or 2.3
accidents)
Low
(10.7% or
« 1 fatality)
Alternative 4:
Disposal of All Mine
Waste Off Site at a
RCRA C or LLRW
Facility
98.8
119,206
(97 million)
17 to 18
years
Very High
(3,120% or
31.2 accidents)
Very High
(146% or
1.5 fatalities
Notes:
a Truckloads and mileage includes mine waste, backfill, and water truckloads.
LLRW Low-level radioactive waste
RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Protection of Workers during Removal Action
Worker protection primarily involves radiation exposure, dust inhalation hazards, physical
injury, and traffic accidents. The contractors that will perform the actions are pre-qualified by
EPA to perform work with low-level radioactive wastes at CERCLA sites, so they are expected
to have the training and experience to mitigate risks associated with the action. All action
alternatives involve the same degree of excavation work; therefore, all action alternatives have
equal amounts of potential radiation exposure, potential dust inhalation hazards, and potential for
injury to workers. However, Alternatives 2 and 3 involve construction of a repository, which
introduces an additional level of threat to workers because of additional handling activities and
duration of exposure during consolidation and capping. A Stennett analysis has been completed
for Alternative 3, which shows that the operation of the disposal facility is safe for facility
workers under the parameters of the analysis (USACE 2022). However, the risk associated with
repository construction are greatly exceeded by risk associated with hauling waste off site.
The rate of traffic accidents and fatalities is proportional to the amount of hauling for that
alternative. For the action alternatives, the total haul distance on all roadways for Alternative 2 is
3 miles (maximum distance from CR-1), Alternative 3 is 44 miles (disposal at the Red Rocks
disposal facility), and Alternative 4 is 625 miles (disposal at the Clean Harbors Deer Trail
facility). Traffic risks associated with each alternative are addressed above in Exhibit 22.
Even though Alternative 2 poses an additional hazard associated with additional handling and
exposure to waste during consolidation and capping, the long-haul distances for off-Navajo
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
99
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
Nation disposal pose the greatest accident threat to truck drivers. Therefore, Alternative 3 was
rated Average because of a medium haul distance of 44 miles, and Alternative 4 was rated
Very Poor because of a long-haul distance of 625 miles. Alternative 2 is rated Good based on
the small footprints and short haul distances. Alternative 1 is rated Very Good as no removal
activities would be conducted to impact workers.
Environmental Impacts
All of the action alternatives will involve excavation of waste and substantial site disturbance.
Shorter construction durations under Alternative 2 minimize the potential for construction-
related environmental impacts to occur in the during road construction, waste excavation, and
site restoration that would require mitigation, and shorter haul distances minimize impacts that
would occur both between the lease areas and on public roads. These impacts may include
residual track-in and track-out effects of soil and mud, noise, nuisance, soil spills during waste
hauling, sedimentation of local drainages, and harmful emissions. Alternative 3 would cause
additional impacts because of the longer 4.5-year project duration while Alternative 4 impacts
would require 17 to 18 years to complete. These additional impacts are primarily related to
hauling distances and duration.
Water pumping or import would also have an impact, depending on source, import distance, and
volume required for dust control and waste compaction. The nearest potential water source is
approximately 20 miles away in Gallup, and the sustainable productivity of a new construction
well is unknown. Onsite consolidation and capping under Alternative 2 would use less water
than offsite hauling because of the shorter project duration (4 years) compared to 4.5-year and
17- to 18-year project durations for Alternatives 3 and 4. Finally, onsite consolidation and
capping would result in less noise and activity disturbance of sensitive biological species because
of the overall shorter project duration.
Environmental Metrics Analysis
A qualitative evaluation of environmental metrics for each action alternative was conducted for
the EE/CA. The metrics do not include post-removal site maintenance activities. The results are
presented in Appendix D, Table D-l. Exhibit 23 presents the environmental impacts of the
alternatives, including water use, greenhouse gas metrics, and a qualitative greenness score for
each alternative.
Exhibit 23. Environmental Impacts of Alternatives
Removal
Alternatives
Water
Import
(million
gallon)
Estimated
Diesel Use
(gallon)
All Truckloads
and Miles
Traveled3
Greenhouse
Gas Emissions
(metric ton CCtee)
Greenness
Scoreb
Alternative 1:
Low
Low
Low
Low
Very Good
No Action
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
(48/48)
Alternative 2:
Low
85,423
(0.69 million)
Consolidate and
Moderate
Low
Low
Good
Cap All Waste On
Site
(23.7)
(0.12 million)
(1,200)
(28/48)
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
100
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
Exhibit 23. Environmental Impacts of Alternatives (Continued)
Removal
Alternatives
Water
Import
(million
gallon)
Estimated
Diesel Use
(gallon)
All Truckloads
and Miles
Traveled3
Greenhouse
Gas Emissions
(metric ton CCtee)
Greenness
Scoreb
Alternative 3:
Disposal of All
Mine Waste Off
Site at Red Rocks
Disposal Facility
Moderate
(26.7)
Moderate
(1.22 million)
Moderate
101,182
(7.1 million)
Moderate
(12,500)
Average
(21/48)
Alternative 4:
Disposal of All
Mine Waste Off
Site at a RCRA C
or LLRW Facility
Very High
(98.8)
Very High
(16.6 million)
Very High
119,206
(97 million)
Very High
(170,900)
Very Poor
(11/48)
Notes:
a Truckloads and mileage includes mine waste, backfill, and water truckloads.
b The higher the greenness score, the less impact on the environment. See Appendix D, Table D-1.
CChe Carbon dioxide equivalent
LLRW Low-level radioactive waste
RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Alternative 2 is rated Good because of the least amount of water used for compaction and dust
control, least amount of species disturbance because of the shortest project durations, shorter
haul distances that require less energy, and smaller greenhouse gas footprint than offsite hauling
under Alternatives 3 and 4. However, Alternative 2 could limit future land uses because of the
need to protect repository caps. Alternatives 3 and 4 are rated Average and Very Poor because
of the increased water use for dust control and species disturbance over moderate to very long
project durations and moderate and to very large energy requirements and greenhouse gases
produced by the truckloads of waste hauled off site to local and regional disposal facilities and
water imported for dust control. Alternative 1 is rated Very Good as no action would occur.
Time until Removal Action Objectives Are Achieved
A summary of the construction completion time for each alternative is presented in Exhibit 24.
All action alternatives (aside from Alternative 1: No Action) could be completed between 4 and
18 years. Alternatives 2 and 3 are similar, but Alternative 4 time to completion is very long and
is limited by the number of trucks and a 3-day turnaround time for the haul trucks.
Exhibit 24. Construction Completion Time for Alternatives
Alternative
Construction Completion Time
Alternative 1: No Action
0 year
Alternative 2: Consolidate and Cap All Waste On Site
4 years
Alternative 3: Disposal of All Mine Waste OffSite at
Red Rocks Disposal Facility
4.5 years
Alternative 4: Disposal of All Mine Waste OffSite at a
RCRA C or LLRW Facility
17 to 18 years
Notes:
LLRW Low-level radioactive waste RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
101
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
5.2.1.4 Long-Term Effectiveness and Permanence (after Removal Action)
For all action alternatives, waste removal or containment from source areas would reduce the
magnitude of residual risk to background levels for radionuclides. Noncancer hazards would be
removed, and the risk to ecological receptors would be reduced to levels below known effects
concentrations and background levels. None of the alternatives reduce the toxicity, mobility, or
volume through treatment.
Alternatives 3 and 4 are rated Very Good as sources of risk at the site would be removed and
waste disposed of off the Navajo Nation. The cap and liner at the disposal facilities would
eliminate exposure pathways. Alternatives 3 and 4 would also allow for unrestricted future use of
the entire site. Removing waste from the Navajo Nation eliminates the long-term surveillance
requirements associated with a repository under Alternative 2. The receiving facilities would be
responsible for the long-term maintenance of the waste under Alternatives 3 and 4.
Alternative 2 would consolidate all waste in a repository. Permanence of risk reduction would
rely on the repository design standards (at least 200 years) to minimize long-term maintenance,
but long-term surveillance of the repository by USEPA would still be required. Alternative 2 is
rated Good. Although the onsite repositories are expected to be protective in both the short and
long term, the ET cap will require long-term maintenance and monitoring. Replacement of
repository components would not be required because their lifespan is indefinite, especially
under a monitoring and maintenance regime.
Alternative 1 is rated Very Poor because no removal action would be performed. Human health
risk may be partially reduced through increased awareness of risks, but no reduction in risk to the
ecosystem would occur. Uncontrolled and untreated waste would remain and continue to be
accessible by humans and animals and subject to potential migration to uncontaminated or less
contaminated areas.
5.2.2 Implementability
Implementability comprises two criteria: (1) technical feasibility and availability of services and
materials, and (2) administrative feasibility.
5.2.2.1 Technical Feasibility and Availability of Services and Materials
Action alternatives consist mainly of simple earthwork and material hauling. The alternatives are
technically feasible with labor available through the local and regional market and equipment
and materials located 1.5 to 2 hours away.
The action alternatives would be completed as a single phase, and no future remedial actions are
anticipated. Short-term monitoring of site restoration features will occur under all action
alternatives while long-term monitoring and maintenance, particularly inspection and repair of
erosional features and controls and revegetation, would be required for Alternative 2 onsite
repository. Experienced contractors, construction equipment, and materials are available within
the region.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
102
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
Among the action alternatives, Alternatives 3 and 4 are the most technically feasible to
implement as all waste is removed from the Quivira Mines to offsite disposal facilities. Design
methods, construction practices, and engineering requirements are well documented and
understood. However, the reliance on the disposal capacity of contracted services brings
uncertainty to the availability of off-Navajo Nation disposal capacity. Therefore, Alternatives 3
and 4 are rated Very Good.
Alternative 2 is technically feasible as waste is consolidated in an onsite repository. Design
methods, construction practices, and engineering requirements are well documented and
understood. Because all waste under Alternative 2 would be disposed of on site, no reliance on
the treatment, storage, or disposal capacity of contracted services would be required. Therefore,
Alternative 2 is rated Good.
Alternative 1 is rated Very Good as it is readily implementable and no construction is involved.
Alternative 1 would not impact the ability to conduct removal or remedial actions in the future.
No services or materials would be needed because no removal action would be performed.
5.2.2.2 Administrative Feasibility
Administratively, Alternative 3 is rated Average because it will require a groundwater discharge
permit from the State of New Mexico, which is supportive of the Red Rocks disposal facility.
Alternative 4 is rated Good as it requires the least amount of design, permitting, and approvals
from and coordination with USEPA, NNEPA, UNC, NAMLRD, NNDWR, NNMD, and the
Coyote Canyon, Pinedale, and Standing Rock Chapters as no onsite repository would be
involved. Post-remedy inspections, reviews, and land use controls would be limited in
comparison to onsite repository construction. However, limitations and delays on waste
acceptance at off-Navajo Nation facilities are possible because of the volume of waste or
disposal facility permit limitations.
Alternative 2 is rated Good as less design, permitting, approvals, and coordination with
USEPA, NNEPA, UNC, NAMLRD, NNDWR, NNMD, and the Coyote Canyon, Pinedale, and
Standing Rock Chapters is required for an onsite repository in comparison to Alternative 3 with
an offsite repository.
Alternative 1 is rated Very Good as taking no action is feasible.
5.2.2.3 Tribal, Supporting Agency, and Community Acceptance
USEPA and NNEPA believe that Alternative 3 (dispose of all mine waste off site at the Red
Rocks disposal facility) has the highest likelihood of acceptance by the Navajo Nation, State of
New Mexico, and Red Water Pond and Pipeline Canyon communities. Community acceptance
may be reduced by a 3- to 5-year delay for permitting, design, and facility construction and a
4.5-year waste hauling period with increased community disruption, noise, and haul truck traffic
volume on local highways.
USEPA and NNEPA believe that Alternative 2 (consolidate and cap all waste on site) may not
receive acceptance from the Navajo Nation and the local communities because it does not require
removal of all wastes from the communities. Alternative 2 is more easily implementable (1 to
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
103
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
2 years of design and 4 years of construction) and will have significantly lower community
disruption, noise, and truck traffic impacts because of limited hauling of waste through the
community than Alternative 3.
USEPA and NNEPA believe that Alternative 4 (dispose of all mine waste off site at a RCRA C
or LLRW facility) might be acceptable to the Navajo Nation and the community because all
waste would be removed from the community; however, the longer construction period will
cause 17 to 18 years of community disruption, noise, and haul truck traffic because of the large
volume of waste, 3-day turnaround time, and long roundtrip distance (up to 625 miles) to the
RCRA C or LLRW disposal facility. Navajo Nation, State of New Mexico, and community
acceptance will be further addressed through the public comment process.
Alternatives 2 and 3 would provide potential job opportunities during construction and
short-term monitoring and maintenance. Alternative 2 would provide additional opportunities
during the required long-term inspection and maintenance of the ET cap. Alternatives 3 and 4
would provide additional job opportunities for truck drivers hauling waste to the offsite disposal
facilities. No long-term maintenance would occur under Alternatives 3 and 4.
Community input received during informal community meetings and workshops have identified
concerns related to moving radioactive materials through the community, traffic, and safety of
leaving the waste on site or placing the waste in the Red Rocks disposal facility. The following
potential mitigations could address community concerns:
• Dust will be controlled using water during loading and on haul roads. Air monitoring will
evaluate dust leaving the site to identify changes required, including applying more water
or stopping work on a windy day.
• Before leaving the site, each truck will be inspected to ensure loads are covered, loose
material has been cleaned and removed to avoid tracking material off site and scanned for
radioactivity to safely pass through communities.
• Strict limits will be set for truck load volume and weight leaving the site to reduce
damage to road surfaces.
• Protection will be achieved through a combination of time and distance. For example,
the exposure from a truck passing by on a road or highway is lower as exposure time
decreases with the truck's speed. Distance also minimizes exposure, where low levels
of gamma activity from waste rock decrease rapidly when measuring from even several
feet away.
• A traffic control plan will be prepared to control haul routes, haul times, and days and to
identify and avoid locations of schools or other sensitive populations.
• An accident contingency plan will be prepared to plan for responding to a haul truck
accident. Typically, an accidental spill of waste rock presents a smaller danger compared
to an accident involving gasoline, propane, or other chemical. A waste rock spill can be
quickly contained and cleaned up with a front end loader and a gamma detector.
• Waste material will be transferred from trucks only at a controlled area at the Red Rocks
disposal facility designed for material handling and with dust control and spill response
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
104
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
materials. Waste rock will not be mixed with other municipal waste. Dust will be
controlled using water. Air monitoring will evaluate dust leaving the site to identify any
changes required, including applying more water or stopping work on a windy day.
• Long-term risk to the community around the Red Rocks disposal facility is low because
the disposal cell is isolated from the community, waste rock will be covered daily during
operation, will be closed with an engineered cap, and monitoring wells in shallow
groundwater will detect any potential releases.
This EE/CA will be available to the public for a 30-day public comment period to give
community members an opportunity to review and comment on the documents, especially the
recommended alternative proposed in the EE/CA. During the public comment period, a public
meeting will be held to present information contained in the EE/CA and to solicit questions and
comments from the community. USEPA will coordinate scheduling and provide formal
announcement of the public comment period and meeting. This process offers the community
and other stakeholders the opportunity to provide input and comment for the USEPA to take into
consideration when making decisions about the site cleanup.
5.2.3 Projected Costs
A summary of the cost for each alternative is presented in Exhibit 25. Alternative costs are
presented as a rating (comparing each alternative to the others) and as the total estimated cost
based on 2023 price evaluations for each alternative.
Exhibit 25. Alternative Costs and Ratings
Alternative
Capital
Cost
Orisite Maintenance
Present Value 7%
Discount Rate
Total Present
Value Cost
Cost Rating
Alternative 1:
No Action
$0
$0
$0
Very Good
Alternative 2: Consolidate
and Cap All Waste On
Site
$59.9
million
$1,7million
(100 years)
$61.6 million
Good
Alternative 3:
Disposal of All Mine
Waste Off Site at Red
Rocks Disposal Facility
$181.1
million
$1.4 million
(30 years)
$182.5 million
Average
Alternative 4:
Disposal of All Mine
Waste Off Site at a RCRA
C or LLRW Facility
$561.6
million
$1.4 million
(30 years)
$563 million
Very Poor
Notes:
Higher cost alternatives rate lower in cost ratings, which is consistent with the rating scheme where low equals less
desirable.
LLRW Low-level radioactive waste
RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Present values, including maintenance costs, for each action alternative using a baseline 30-year
project duration for site restoration maintenance and 100-year cap maintenance under CERCLA
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
105
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
for onsite consolidation and capping (Alternative 2) at a 7 percent discount rate specified in
USEPA (1993) guidance are summarized in Exhibit 25.
Alternative 1 is the least expensive because no construction and maintenance costs are incurred
and is rated Very Good. Alternative 2 ($61.6 million) is rated Good and is $121 million less
than Alternative 3. Alternative 3 is rated Average and Alternative 4 is rated Very Poor because
their respective costs are 3 to 9.1 times higher than Alternative 2, and Alternative 4 costs are
3.1 times more than Alternative 3.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
106
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
6.0 RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIV
J
As required by NCP and described in USEPA (1993) guidance, alternatives were evaluated
individually against the following three broad criteria: effectiveness, implementability, and cost
(see Section 4.3). Section 5.0 includes a comparative analysis evaluating the strengths and
weaknesses of each alternative relative to the other alternatives with respect to the three criteria
and in achieving RAOs.
USEPA's recommended alternative for the Quivira Mines is Alternative 3 (dispose of all
mine wastes at Red Rocks disposal facility). The primary elements of the recommended
alternative are:
• Excavation of an estimated 1,005,500 bank cubic yards or 1,256,875 loose cubic yards of
waste from the Quivira Mines to the cleanup goals identified in Exhibit 15.
• Completion of permitting, design, and construction of the Red Rocks disposal facility,
which is expected to take 3 to 5 years.
• Transportation of an estimated 1,256,875 loose cubic yards of waste from the Quivira
Mines in covered trucks over the 44-mile recommended haul route to the Red Rocks
disposal facility over 4.5 years for disposal in a separate facility and disposal cell from
the municipal landfill.
• The recommended truck haul route is south on State Highway 566 to Interstate 40,
exiting Interstate 40 at Thoreau, and north on State Highway 371 to the Red Rocks
disposal facility. Section 4.1.2 and Tetra Tech (2024) provides an evaluation of rail and
truck haul routes.
• Site restoration at CR-1, CR-1E, and the Kerr-McGee Ponds by regrading, implementing
erosion and stormwater controls, backfilling, amending, and revegetating the areas.
• Preparation of a short-term monitoring and maintenance plan after the remedy is
identified in the action memorandum.
• Short-term monitoring and maintenance of the site restoration areas for 30 years.
• Long-term monitoring and maintenance of the Red Rocks disposal facility, which would
be the responsibility of the Northwest New Mexico Regional Solid Waste Authority
supported by financial assurance bonding.
The largest capital costs for Alternative 3 are excavation, transportation, and disposal of the mine
wastes at the Red Rocks disposal facility. A Stennett analysis showed this alternative to be safe
for disposal facility workers receiving waste under the parameters of the analysis (USACE
2022). RAOs and cleanup levels for surface soil, air, and radiation would be achieved at the
completion of the remedy construction. A 10- to-3 0-year period of recovery will be needed to
achieve site vegetative restoration, depending on precipitation patterns.
The cost estimate for Alternative 3 is included in Exhibit 18 and Appendix E. The total cost for
Alternative 3 is estimated to be $182.5 million, which is 3 times higher than Alternative 2
(consolidate and cap all waste on site) and 3.1 times less than Alternative 4 (dispose of all mine
waste at a RCRA C or LLRW facility).
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
107
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
All action alternatives are protective. Alternatives 3 and 4 remove waste from the Red Water
Pond and Pipeline Canyon communities while the capped waste remains in the community in
Alternative 2. Alternative 3 transports the waste 44 miles for disposal compared to 625 miles in
Alternative 4. The shorter distance would produce significantly lower diesel exhaust emissions
from long-haul transportation and also significantly reduce community disruption from noise and
potential traffic accidents and fatalities.
USEPA and NNEPA expect that Alternative 3 will be more acceptable to the Navajo Nation and
the local communities than Alternatives 1 and 2 because all waste would be removed from the
site, resulting in unrestricted land use once vegetation is reestablished. All alternatives would
provide job opportunities to the community during construction, waste hauling and short-term
maintenance while Alternatives 2 and 3 would provide long-term inspection and maintenance
job opportunities at on- and off-site repositories. Training programs would be used to develop
job skills to allow the local community to participate in both short- and long-term construction
and maintenance opportunities.
Next Steps
Though USEPA has identified a recommended alternative, USEPA will solicit input from
Navajo Nation officials, regulators, chapter representatives, other stakeholders, and community
on this final EE/CA and recommended alternative during a public comment period. USEPA
and NNEPA will hold a public meeting during the comment period to listen to input. USEPA
will select a final removal action alternative after reviewing and considering all information
submitted during the public comment period. Comments received at the public meeting and the
final removal action alternative will be documented in an action memorandum. USEPA may
modify the recommended alternative or select another alternative presented in this EE/CA
based on new information or public comments. Therefore, interested parties are encouraged to
review and comment on all of the removal action alternatives presented in this EE/CA.
USEPA will carefully consider Navajo Nation Fundamental Law and Dine Lifeways in its
restoration approach.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
108
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
7.0 REFERENC
J
Brister, B.S., and G.K. Hoffman. 2002. "Fundamental Geology of San Juan Basin Energy
Resources." In New Mexico's Energy, Present and Future: Policy, Production,
Economics, and the Environment. Pages 21 through 25. New Mexico Bureau of Geology
and Mineral Resources. Socorro, New Mexico.
Brown, J.E., B. Alfonso, R. Avila, N.A. Beresford, D. Copplestone, G. Prohl, and A. Ulanovsky.
2008. "The ERICA Tool." Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. Volume 99, Issue 9.
Pages 1371 through 1383.
Conestoga Rovers and Associates Ltd. (CRA) and SENES Consultants Limited (SENES). 2013.
"Red Water Pond Road Removal Action, Church Rock Site, McKinley County, NM."
February.
Ecology and Environment, Inc. 2012. "Quivira Mine Screening-Level Investigation Report."
Engineering/Remediation Resources Group, Inc. (ERRG). 2011. "Regional Groundwater
Assessment of Impacts from Historic Releases of the NECR Mine and UNC Mill
Facilities Navajo Nation." September.
Gordian. 2023. "RSMeans Data." Version 2023.
Harper, Barbara L. 2007. "Traditional Tribal Subsistence Exposure Scenario and Risk
Assessment Guidance Manual." Oregon State University Department of Public Health
and Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation. United State Environmental
Protection Agency Grant Number EPA-STAR-J1-R831046. August.
Meteoblue. 2020. "Simulated Historical Climate and Weather Data for Gallup: Wind Rose."
Accessed April 24.
https://www.meteoblue.com/en/weather/historyclimate/climatemodelled/gallup_united-
states-of-america_5468773.
Montgomery Watson Harza (MWH). 2003. "Northeast Church Rock Mine Site Assessment."
July.
MWH. 2006. "Technical Memorandum: Results of Background and Radium-226 Correlation
Sampling, Northeast Church Rock Mine Site, United Nuclear Corporation." October.
MWH. 2010. "Northeast Church Rock Mine Interim Removal Action Completion Report."
June 29.
MWH. 2013. "Northeast Church Rock Mine Eastern Drainage Removal Action Completion
Report." March 13.
MWH. 2018. "Northeast Church Rock 95% Design Report, United Nuclear Corporation." July.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
109
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
Navajo Nation Division of Community Development. 2019. "Navajo Population (5-Year
Estimate) by Chapter." https://navajoprofile.wind.enavajo.org.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2006. "Atlas 14 Point Precipitation
Frequency Estimates: NM." National Weather Service, Hydrometeorological Design
Studies Center, U.S. Department of Commerce. July 15.
https://hdsc.nws. noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_map_cont.html?bkmrk=nm.
Quivira Mining Company. 1987. "Abandonment and Reclamation Plan, Church Rock I, IE, and
II Mines, Navajo Nation Lease 14-20-20603-9988. Church Rock, New Mexico. January.
Red Water Pond Road Community Association and Southwest Research and Information Center.
2012. "History through Pictures Past and Present of the Red House People." Revised
September.
Red Water Pond Road and Pipeline Canyon Residents. 2006. "Red Water Pond Road and
Pipeline Canyon Residents' Resolution." August 15.
SENES Consultants Limited (SENES). 2010. "Removal Evaluation Work Plan, Church Rock
Sites 1 and IE, Phase II." Redlined Version. December.
SENES. 2011. "Interim Removal Action, Final Removal Site Evaluation (RSE) Report for
Northeast Church Rock - Quivira Site Evaluation for Church Rock (CR-1) and (CR-1E)
Mine Sites." September.
Tetra Tech, Inc. (Tetra Tech). 2021. "Application of Evapotranspiration Cover in the
Southwest." February.
Tetra Tech. 2022a. "Technical Memorandum, Biological Survey Report, Quivira Mines and
Kerr-McGee Ponds, Eastern Abandoned Uranium Mine Region." Prepared for the Navajo
Nation Department of Fish and Game. June 3.
Tetra Tech. 2022b. "Quivira Mines and Kerr-McGee Ponds Biological Assessment." Response,
Assessment, and Evaluation Services. Contract No. EP-S9-17-03.
Tetra Tech. 2023a. "Preconstruction Biological Survey Report, Eastern Abandoned Uranium
Mine Region, Quivira Mines." Prepared for the Navajo Nation Department of Fish and
Game. July 31.
Tetra Tech. 2023b. "Quivira Mines Data Gaps Investigation Transmittal Memorandum."
Response, Assessment, and Evaluation Services. Contract No. EP-S9-17-03. September.
Tetra Tech. 2023c. "Navajo Abandoned Uranium Mines Program, Navajo Abandoned Uranium
Mine Site, Ecological Removal Goal Development for Metals in Soil." Draft. December.
Tetra Tech. 2024. "Quivira Mines Waste Rail and Truck Haul Route Evaluation." February 12.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
110
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2022. "Technical Memorandum; Disposal of Uranium
Mine Spoils Stennett Evaluation." Draft. December.
U.S. Census Bureau. 2019. "Church Rock, New Mexico, Population Estimate." Accessed
March 16. http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/community_facts.xhtml.
U.S. Census Bureau. 2021. "Gallup, New Mexico, Population Estimate." Accessed
September 30.
http://factf1nder.census.g0v/faces/tableservices/j sf/pages/productview.xhtml?src=CF.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1989. "Risk Assessment Guidance for
Superfund (RAGS). Volume I, Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part A)." Interim
Final. EPA/540/1-89/002. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. December.
https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-09/documents/rags_a.pdf.
USEPA. 1991a. "A Guide to Principal Threat and Low Level Threat Wastes." Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER). 9380.3-06FS. November.
USEPA. 1991b. "Superfund Removal Procedures, Guidance on the Consideration of ARARs
During Removal Actions." OSWER. 9360.3-02, August.
USEPA. 1993. "Conducting Non-Time Critical Removal Actions Under CERCLA." OSWER.
EPA540-R-93-057. August. https://semspub.epa.gov/work/HQ/122068.pdf.
USEPA. 1997. "Ecological Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund - Process for Designing
and Conducting Ecological Risk Assessments." Environmental Response Team. EPA-
540-R-97-006. OSWER. Directive No. 9285.7-25. June.
USEPA. 1999. "Ecological Risk Assessment and Risk Management Principles for Superfund
Sites." OSWER Directive 9285.7-28P.
USEPA. 2000. "A Guide to Developing and Documenting Cost Estimates during the Feasibility
Study." OSWER. 9355.0-75, July.
USEPA. 2001. "Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Volume I Human Health Evaluation
Manual (Part D, Standardized Planning, Reporting, and Review of Superfund Risk
Assessments)." Publication 9285.7-47. December.
USEPA. 2002a. "Supplemental Guidance for Developing Soil Screening Levels for Superfund
Sites" OSWER. 9355.4-24. December.
http://www.epa.gov/superfund/health/conmedia/soil/index.htm.
USEPA. 2002b. "Calculating Exposure Point Concentrations at Hazardous Waste Sites."
OSWER. 9285.6-10. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. December.
USEPA. 2010a. E-mail Regarding Faxes Containing Historic Church Rock Maps. From Cynthia
Wetmore, USEPA. To Robin L. Mock, ERRG. January.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
111
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
USEPA. 2010b. "ProUCL Statistical Software for Environmental Applications for Data Sets
with and without Nondetect Observation." Version 4.1.01. Prepared by A. Singh and
A.K. Singh. EPA/600/R-07/041. May.
USEPA. 2010c. "Action Memorandum for Interim Actions pertaining to Red Water Pond Road,
Site Stabilization and Characterization, Northeast Church Rock Quivira Mine Site."
August 24.
USEPA. 2011. "Action Memorandum: Request for a Non-Time-Critical Removal Action at the
Northeast Church Rock Mine Site, McKinley County, New Mexico, Pinedale Chapter of
the Navajo Nation." September 29.
USEPA. 2015. "United Nuclear Corporation (McKinley County) New Mexico. Site Status
Summary." February 11.
USEPA. 2016. "Memorandum: Consideration of Greener Cleanup Activities in the Superfund
Cleanup Process." August 2.
USEPA. 2022. "ProUCL Technical Guide: Statistical Software for Environmental Applications
for Data Sets with and without Nondetect Observations." Version 5.2.0. June 14.
USEPA. 2023. "Impact of Mine Water Discharge in the Upper Gallup, Zone 3". December.
USEPA. 2024a. "Navajo Abandoned Uranium Mine Risk Assessment Methodology." Draft
Final. March.
USEPA. 2024b. "Navajo Abandoned Uranium Mine Risk Calculator." Version 1.03. March.
USEPA. 2024c. "Navajo Abandoned Uranium Mines Program, Preliminary Ecological Removal
Goals for Metals and Radionuclides in Soil for Navajo Abandoned Uranium Mine Site."
Draft. March.
Western Regional Climate Center. 2018. "Gallup Municipal Airport, New Mexico (293422)."
July 22.
Weston Solutions, Inc. (Weston). 2010. "Expanded Site Screening, North East Church Rock -
Quivira Mines, Navajo Nation, New Mexico." April.
Weston. 2015. "Removal Assessment Report for Quivira Mine Church Rock No. 2 Mine Site,
Navajo Nation, McKinley County, New Mexico." Draft. September.
Weston. 2016. "Removal Assessment Report for Quivira Mine Site Features Including Quivira
Vent Holes 1 through 4, Navajo Nation, McKinley County, New Mexico." October 24.
Weston. 2019a. "Quivira Tronox Mine Former Dewatering Ponds Removal Assessment Report,
Navajo Nation, New Mexico." March.
Weston. 2019b. "Quivira Tronox Mine Removal Action Report for Quivira Vent Holes 1
through 5, Navajo Nation, McKinley County, New Mexico." March.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
112
-------
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis, Quivira Mines
Westwater Resources. 2018. "Technical Report on the Ambrosia Lake Uranium Project,
McKinley County, New Mexico, USA." March 30.
Whicker, F.W., T.G. Hinton, M. M. MacDonell, J.E. Pinder III, and L.J. Habegger. 2004.
"Avoiding Destructive Remediation at DOE Sites." Science. Volume 303. Pages 1,615
through 1,616.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
113
-------
FIGURES
-------
CF 1 Quivira Tronox Church Rock
CR-1E Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1 East Mine Site
CR-2 Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 2 Mine Site
Kerr-McGee Kerr-McGee Corporation
Drainage Bureau of Land Management Property
- Road ~ Navajo Nation Boundary
Former Vent Hole Closed by Removal Action Navajo Nation Chapter Boundary
Kerr-McGee Ponds Investigation Boundary Navajo Nation Regions
Northeast Church Rock Mine Area Central Region
Church Rock Mine Lease Area Eastern Region
I 1100-Foot Step-Out Boundary North Central Re9'on
I 1 Kerr-McGee Ponds Fenceline Northern Re9ion
United Nuclear Corporation Site Area Southern Region
(Private Property) Western Re9ion
N
Feet
0
2,000
4,000
Prepared for: U.S. EPA Region 9
Prepared By:
TETRA TECH
QUIVIRA MINES LOCATION
Task Order No.:
0001
Location:
QUIVIRA MINES
-
Contract No.:
68HE0923D0002
Date:
3/6/2024
Figure No
1
-------
iSaisll®
Pond -3a
Red Water Pond Road•
FORJMER POND AREA
WASTE ROCK AREA
Ron a [a
Kondfal
Pond
PondlQ.utfallitolliJnnamed Arroyo
>:i± .. a*•'
/' Sv
/ \ a
VVJ?/ T./ , . <•/.
_/ x* r r« V; \
• '»\ »AT*
f * «<./ * ivu/
j *
• %
— V
I !"•'
HAFT
f ST-,
i ,
• » ~ . .7 "
# m ¦> V a
fvi
~ * •»-
EhUI
£ .
LJ CR-1 Lease Boundary
J~~] CR-1 100-Foot Step-Out Boundary
Waste Rock Pile
I I Former industrial Area
~ Former Building
~ Former Pond
Sub Area Limit
¦ Existing Water Pipeline Easement
Proposed Water Pipeline Easement
— Unnamed Arroyo #2
Road
—
-------
I I CR-1E Lease Boundary
LT3 CR-1E 100-Foot Step-Out Boundary
L7Jj CR-1E Former Buildings
L* J CR-1E Former Pond
Waste Rock Area
I I Former Industrial Area
Pipeline Canyon Road
Pipeline Canyon Arroyo
Communication Line
Natural Gas Line
Petroleum Line
—< Adit
Shaft
Note:
CR-1E Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1 East
Mine Site
1 inch = 150 feet /!
1:1,800 I
o
150 75 0 150
~i Feet
QUIVIRA CR-1E MINE
SITE FEATURES
Prepared For: U.S. EPA Region 9
m
Prepared By:
TETRATECH
Task Order No.:
000 1
Contract No.:
68HE0923D0002
QUIVIRA MINES
3/6/2024
Coordinate System:
NAD 1983 State Plane New Mexico West
FIPS 3003 Feet Transverse Mercator
Figure No.:
-------
United Nuclear
Corporation Site
/ *SS
IW'
Figure No
a/
Hp * +¦—
stAnd ng!r@ck3ghapter , 1
K4:)im JM
Road
Arroyo
Former Pond
Kerr-McGee Ponds
Investigation Boundary
Former Stockpile Area
Former Equipment Storage Area
I I Kerr-McGee Ponds Fenceline
United Nuclear Corporation Site Boundary
Navajo Nation Chapter Boundary
Note:
Kerr-McGee Kerr-McGee Corporation
Prepared for: U.S. EPA Region 9
Prepared By:
TETRA TECH
WVf'fc
KERR-MCGEE PONDS SITE FEATURES
Task Order No.:
0001
Location:
QUIVIRA MINES
Contract No.:
68HE0923D0002
Date:
3/6/2024
-------
COYOTE CANYON CHAPTER
PINEDALE CHAPTER
err-McG
Ponds
Notes:
CR-1
CR-1E
Kerr-McGee
Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1 Mine Site
Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1 East Mine Site
Kerr-McGee Corporation
I I Background Study Area
I I Lease Boundary
Kerr-McGee Ponds
L II Investigation Boundary
Kerr-McGee Ponds Fenceline
Navajo Nation Chapter Boundary
Geology
Quaternary Alluvium, Valley Fill Member,
Undifferentiated (Qa)
Crevasse Canyon Formation,
Bartlett Barren Member (Kcb)
Crevasse Canyon Formation,
Dalton Sandstone Member (Kcda)
Crevasse Canyon Formation,
Dilco Coal Member (Kcdi)
Crevasse Canyon Formation,
Gibson Coal Member (Keg)
Crevasse Canyon Formation,
Mulatto Tongue of Mancos
Shale Member (Kcda)
Crevasse Canyon Formation,
Point Lookout Member (Kpl)
—~ Erosion from Upslope to Dovvnslope Areas
N
S
1 inch = 1,000 feet
1:12,000
1,000
500
1,000
I Feet
LOCAL GEOLOGY AND
BACKGROUND STUDY AREAS
Prepared For: U.S. EPA Region 9
{&)
% M*#
Prepared By:
TETRATECH
Task Order No.:
000 1
Contract No.:
68HE0923D0002
QUIVIRA MINES
3/6/2024
Coordinate System:
NAD 1983 State Plane New Mexico West
FIPS 3003 Feet Transverse Mercator
Figure No.:
-------
V
COYOTE CANYON CHAPTER
CR-1E
Soil Type
Uranium mined lands
Toldohn-Vessilla-Rock outcrop complex
Parkelei-Fraguni complex
Parkelei family-Evpark complex
Parkelei family-Fraguni complex
Sparank-San Mateo-Zia complex
Doakum fine sandy loam
Vessilla-Rock outcrop complex
Rock outcrop-Eagleye-Atchee complex
Evpark-Arabrab complex
Parkelei-Evpark fine sandy loam
Mentmore loam
Buckle fine sandy loam
State Highway 566
W''f 'wBST
• { . /
mmSt
BSA-05
STANDING ROCK CHAPTER
PINEDALE CHAPTER
Kerr-McGee
Ponds
Notes:
CR-1 Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1 Mine Site
CR-1E Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1 East Mine Site
Kerr-McGee Kerr-McGee Corporation
EH Background Study Area Former Kerr-McGee Pond
— Road li i Kerr-McGee Ponds Lease Boundary
Arroyos Former Stockpile Area /\
II 1 Quivira Lease Boundary Kerr-McGee Ponds Fenceline
t;l 100-Foot Step-Out Boundary Navajo Nation Chapter Boundary N
0 1,000 2,000
Prepared for: U.S. EPA Region 9
$ O ii
LOCAL SOILS AND BACKGROUND STUDY AREAS
Prepared By:
Task Order No.:
0001
Contract No.:
68HE0923D0002
Figure No:
6
Location:
QUIVIRA MINES
Date:
09/10/2020
-------
HISTORIC
TAILINGS DISPOSAL CELLS
DISCHARGE FROM
MINE DEWATERING "
Quivira CR-1 Mine
Waste Rock Pile
SEEPAGE FROM MINE
WATER DISCHARGE INTO
ALLUVIUM FROM
PIPE LINE ARROYO
NOT TO SCALE
NW
Source:
Westwater Resources, 2018. "Technical Report on the Ambrosia Lake
Uranium Project, McKinley County, New Mexico, USA." March 30.
WASTE ROCK/ PLACED
BACK IN MINE
sw
Notes:
CR-1 Church Rock Mine No.1
NECR Northeast Church Rock
UNC United Nuclear Corporation
Legend
Mine
— Tributary Alignment
- - Ephemeral Stream
Geologic Contact
Water Flow Direction
Historic Release
Prepared By:
"T^J TETRATECH
CONCEPTUAL DRAWING OF HISTORIC
RELEASES AND WATER FLOW
Task Order No.:
TO 0001
NAVAJO NATION
Contract No.:
68HE0923D0002
2/21/24
-------
Legend
Homesites United Nuclear Corporation
Road Boundary (Private Property)
Navajo Nation Chapter Boundary I > Community Area
I Mine Boundary
I I Kerr-McGee Pond Fenceline
Kerr-McGee Ponds
Investigation Boundary
Northeast Church Rock
Mine Boundary
Land Use
Navajo Residential
Navajo Difficult Access Open Space
Bureau of Land Management Property United Nuclear Corporation Outdoor Worker
Existing Water Pipeline Easement
Proposed Water Pipeline Easement
Communication Line i Feet
Natural Gas Line 0 1,100 2,200
Petroleum Line
Prepared for: U.S. EPA Region 9
Prepared By:
TETRA TECH
LAND USE DESIGNATIONS
Task Order No.:
0001
Location:
QUIVIRA MINES
Contract No.:
68HE0923D0002
Date:
3/4/2024
Figure No
8
-------
Gallup Municipal Airport Monthly Climate Summary
Period of Record 01/08/1973 to 06/10/2016
EO !n.| Areragc Sr»a«v Death {In.) ¦ Are-rage Pan E^aaof a ton {in.)
Data taken from hCtpi://wrcc.dri.edu/cgi-hiiVcliMAIN.pl7nm3425
¦Areragc Mat TcmpcralLire (F|
-Averse Mm. Tmparaftn (F)
Unofficial values based on averages/sums of smoothed daily data. Information is computed
from available daily data during the 1973-2016 period. Smoothing, missing data, and
observation-time changes may cause these 1973-2016 values to differ from official National
Climatic Data Center (NCDC) values. This table is presented for use at locations that don't
have official NCDC data. No adjustments were made for missing data or time of observation.
Pan Evaporation data is from Western Regional Climate Center: Comparative Table (dri.edu)
- Gallup Ranger Station
Data taken from https://wrcc.dri.edu/cgi-bin/cliMAIN.pl7nm3425 and
https://wrcc.dri. edu/Climate/comp_table_show.php?stype=pan_evap_avg
Prepared for: U.S. EPA Region 9
(i O |\
MONTHLY AVERAGE
TEMPERATURE, PRECIPITATION,
AND EVAPOTRANSPIRATION
Prepared By:
H TETRATECH
Task Order No.:
T00001
Contract No.:
68HE0923D0002
Figure No.:
9
Location:
QUIVIRA MINES
Date:
02/21/24
Date Saved: 1/19/2023
-------
N
NNW
NNE
750
NW
NE
WNW
W
WSW
SW
ENE
\
ESE
SE
ssw
SSE
0
>17
>0
>24
>3
>31
>7
>38 mph
>12
rnph Miles per hour
SOURCE: REPRODUCED FROM
METEOBLUE CLIMATE DIAGRAMS
(https://vww.meteoblue.com/en/weather/
historyclimate/climatemodelled/
gal lu p_u n ited-states-of-
america_5468773)
Prepared for: U.S. EPA Region 9
Prepared By:
TETRATECH
1999 Harrison Street, Suite 500
Oakland, CA94612
GALLUP, NEW MEXICO
WIND ROSE DIAGRAM
Task Order No.:
TO 0001
Quivira Mines
Contract No.:
68HE0923D0002
2/21/24
Figure No.:
10
-------
Pipeline Canyon Road
Community/Area
J quivira i
i MINE^M* *1 #
CR-1E
QUIVIRA • / /J
J VENT HOLE 4 QUIVIRA
VENT HOLE 5
Red Water Pond Road Community Area
QUIVIRA
^ENTiHOLTe 3
:^K|
Eastern Drainage*!
QUIVIRA;:,- ^
t quivir^i^HB :^veni«e-1
Coyote Canyon Chapter vent hole 2
Step-Out
[Removal
Area #1
Standing Rock Chapter
Pinedaie Chapter
Kerr-McGee
NORTHEAST
CHURCH ROCK
mm
Ponds
MINE
UNITED NUCLEAR
CORPORATION MILL
(PRIVATE PROPERTY)
Notes:
CR-1
CR-1E
CR-2
Kerr-McGee
Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1 Mine Site
Quivira Tronox Church Rock No, 1 East Mine Site
Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 2 Mine Site
Kerr-McGee Corporation
Quivira Mine Lease Boundary
Northeast Church Rock Mine Boundary
United Nuclear Corporation Site
Area (Private Property)
Red Water Pond Road Removal Area
Quivira Vent Hole Removal Area
ll III Kerr-McGee Ponds Fenceline
Kerr-McGee Ponds
Investigation Boundary
Northeast Church Rock Removal Area
[__J Community Area
Access Route
rs?i Waste from Removal Actions
Navajo Nation Chapter Boundary
Bureau of Land Management Property
N
W E
1 inch = 1,500 feet
1:18,000
o
1,500 750 0 1,500
~ Feet
PRIOR REMOVAL ACTION LOCATIONS
Prepared For: U.S. EPA Region 9
Prepared By:
TETRATECH
Task Order No.:
000 1
Contract No.:
68HE0923D0002
Location:
QUIVIRA MINES
3/4/2024
Coordinate System:
NAD 1983 State Plane New Mexico West
FIPS 3003 Feet Transverse Mercator
Figure No.:
11
-------
1,000'
1,250'
1,500'
1,750'
1" = 200 feet
TRANSPORT PATHWAY MODEL
2,000'
2,250'
2,500'
Prepared for: U.S. EPA Region 9
/^t%.
feszzf
QUIVIRA MINES
TRANSPORT MODEL
Prepared By:
-ft tetratech
Task Order No.:
TO 0001
Contract No.:
68HE0923D002
Figure No.:
12
Location:
Quivira Mines
Date:
02/21/24
-------
APPLICABLE HUMAN EXPOSURE SCENARIOS ECOLOGICAL EXPOSURE SCENARIOS
United Nuclear
PRIMARY SOURCES OF PRIMARY RELEASE SECONDARY SOURCES SECONDARY RELEASE EXPOSURE Kee'da'whu teeh Kqq ei doo nahaazah dah Corporation EXPOSURE Plants and Birds and
CONTAMINATION SOURCE MEDIA MECHANISMS OF CONTAMINATION MECHANISMS EXPOSURE MEDIA ROUTES (Full-Time Navajo Resident) (Difficult Access Open Space) Outdoor Worker ROUTES Invertebrates Mammals
Background
Sources
(Natural In Situ
Material)
Waste Rock Piles
Former Detention
and Dewatering
Ponds, Former
Industrial Areas,
and Roads
Underground
Mine Workings
Exposed Ore, Rock,
Soil
Surface Mine
Waste
Subsurface Mine
Waste
(if brought to
surface)
Radioactive Decay
Radon Gas
Emanation
Wind Erosion
Erosion via
Storm or
Snowmelt Runoff
Mass Wasting
Gamma Radiation
Ambient Air
Soil
Storm water/
Snowmelt Runoff
Leaching/
Dissolution
Surface Water
t
Sediment
Entrainment/
Deposition
Alluvial
Groundwater
Subsurface
Ore Body
Leaching/
Dissolution
Mine Workings,
Porous or
Fracture Flow
Groundwater
Wells, Seeps, and
Springs (Formation
Groundwater)
Plant Uptake/
Uptake through
Food Chain
Gamma Radiation
Air
Soil/Sediment
Water
Plants/Animals
Air
Soil/Sediment
Surface Water
Groundwater
Cultivated Plants
Wild Plants
Animals
External Exposure
Inhalation
Incidental Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Ingestion
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Ingestion
External Exposure
Inhalation
Dermal/Direct Contact
Ingestion
Trophic Transfer
Dermal/Direct Contact
Ingestion
Trophic Transfer
Ingestion
Ingestion
Trophic Transfer
Notes:
X Indicates the exposure pathway is potentially complete and is evaluated in the risk assessment except as noted.
— Indicates the exposure pathway is not complete or de minimus and is not evaluated in the risk assessment
1 The human health risk evaluation does not include inhalation of radon by humans or animals. Because radon is a gas and readily disperses in outdoor air, the risk in outdoor is considered to be minimal. Radon in indoor air is a potential risk for future residential receptors; however, radon
exposure is building specific and the buildings are not currently present and, thus, cannot be evaluated. Furthermore, because radon is a known risk in the area, any future buildings would likely be constructed to mitigate this known risk.
2 The human health risk evaluation does not include ingestion of surface water or groundwater by humans or animals. Safe drinking water is supplied to residents in the Quivira Tronox Mines area. Wells used for livestock have been tested and are upgradient of the known groundwater contamination in the area.
The arroyos are mostly dry, and the ponds are dry since mine operations have stopped. If surface or groundwater use patterns change in the future, the risk from use should be evaluated.
3 The human health risk evaluation includes ingestion of select cultivated plants (crops) by this receptor. Scenario inputs were provided by the Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency (NNEPA) (2021).
4 The human health risk evaluation includes ingestion, dermal (metals only), and inhalation of select wild herbs and medicinal plants by this receptor. Scenario inputs were provided by NNEPA (2021).
5 The human health risk evaluation includes ingestion of home-raised animals (meat, milk, and eggs) and hunted animals (meat only) for this receptor. Scenario inputs were provided by NNEPA (2021).
6 The ecological risk evaluation includes evaluation of external radiation based on exposure to gamma-emitting radionuclides from contaminated soil and evaluation of internal radiation through plant uptake, incidental soil ingestion, and food web uptake (Los Alamos National Laboratory 2015).
7 Potential exposures include inhalation of ambient air and air in burrows and underground mines. The ecological risk evaluation does not include evaluation of the inhalation pathway.
8 The ecological risk evaluation does not include evaluation of direct contact with or ingestion of surface water.
References:
Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency (NNEPA). 2021. "Navajo Tribe Provisional Reasonable Maximum Exposures RME for the Navajo Risk Assessments." Draft. September 15.
Los Alamos National Laboratory. 2015. "Screening-Level Ecological Risk Assessment Methods." Revision 4. EP2015-0174. October 29.
Figure 13. Quivira Mines Conceptual Site Model Wire Diagram
-------
Mine Lease Boundary
Area predominately covered by
static gamma measurements
Gamma Rate (cpm)
< 13,700 < BTV
13,700 - 27,400 1 x BTV - 2 x BTV
27,400-41,100 2 x BTV - 3 x BTV
41,100-54,800 3 x BTV - 4 x BTV
54,800 - 68,500 4 x BTV - 5 x BTV
> 68,500 > 5 x BTV
Notes:
BTV Background threshold value
cpm Counts per minute
CR-1 Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1 Mine Site
1 inch = 300 feet
1:3,600
N
S
250 125 0 250
i Feet
2022 CR-1 TRANSECT
GAMMA SCAN MEASUREMENTS
Prepared For: U.S. EPA Region 9
(&)
Prepared By:
TETRA TECH
It
Task Order No.:
Contract No
000 1
68HE0923D0002
Location:
QUIVIRA MINES
Date:
3/4/2024
Coordinate System:
Figure No.:
NAD 1983 State Plane New Mexico West
FIPS 3003 Feet Transverse Mercator
14
-------
-------
rag * y*
'if v •
^ ¦ Fa
Kerr-McGee Ponds
Investigation Boundary
|__| UNC Mill Site Boundary
~ Contamination Associated with a
UNC Site Further to the Southeast
Gamma Rate (cpm)
• < 13,700 < BTV
13,700 - 27,400 1 x BTV - 2 x BTV
27,400-41,100 2 x BTV - 3 x BTV
• 41,100-54,800 3 x BTV - 4 x BTV
• 54,800 - 68,500 4 x BTV - 5 x BTV
> 68,500
> 5 x BTV
Navajo Nation
UnftecF Nii
Pi '
¦ %. „&• i
,"V
- -
w
j*!C'
tl
M •
Notes:
BTV Background threshold value
cpm Counts per minute
Kerr-McGee Kerr-McGee Corporation
UNC United Nuclear Corporation
1 inch = 300 feet
1:3,600
200 100 0
2022 KERR-MCGEE PONDS
TRANSECT GAMMA
SCAN MEASUREMENTS
Prepared For: U.S. EPA Region 9
(A?
Prepared By:
TETRATECH
Task Order No.:
000 1
QUIVIRA MINES
Contract No.:
68HE0923D0002
3/4/2024
I Coordinate System:
NAD 1983 State Plane New Mexico West
FIPS 3003 Feet Transverse Mercator
Figure No.:
16
-------
Prepared By:
TETRATECH
Mine Lease Boundary
Interpolated Ra-226 Greater than 2 pCi/g
Data Excluded from Ra-226 Interpolation
as Known Contaminated Area Previously
Addressed by Static Gamma Survey
L J TENORM Boundary
V/\ Reclaimed Ponds Backfilled with NORM
Interpolated Ra-226 (pCi/g)
~ <2.0 £BTV
20-40 1 x BIV - 2 xBTV
4 0 _ 6.0 2 x BTV " 3 x BTV
6.0 - 8.0 3 x BTV " 4 x BTV
8.0-10 4 x BTV - 5 x BTV
>10 > 5 x BTV
Surface Soil Samples - Ra-226
O Below RAG of 2 pCi/g
O Above RAG of 2 pCi/g
Notes:
BTV Background threshold value
CR-1 Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1 Mine Site
NORM Naturally occuring radioactive material
pCi/g Picocurie per gram
RAG Removal action goal
Ra-226 Radium-226
TENORM Technologically enhanced naturally occurring
radioactive material
1 inch = 700 feet
1:8,400
~ Feet
CR-1 CORRELATED AND
LABORATORY RA-226
RESULTS IN SURFACE SOILS
Prepared For: U.S. EPA Region 9
Task Order No.:
000 1
Contract No.:
68HE0923D0002
QUIVIRA MINES
3/4/2024
Coordinate System:
NAD 1983 State Plane New Mexico West
FIPS 3003 Feet Transverse Mercator
Figure No.:
-------
>v;.
. »t«L 1 Vw*»>
1
tiZE '. » .**t ;^^• ¦•vi.'* #¦" " ~ w.^
• *~
%. if w- • - ' % 'ml •*^r 1 J±-
h * V*;
-^w "+•*+ r
«¦&
W
¦*rW,
•* •¦? ••sr?
/¦ *
\
\v>
V. X
9- \ t; »-. •• - «¦
¦jr?-3?-
' j3'
~ IflfV-* ;: •
fF»> TVfl %,_
*
?¦
*
;? v* »
1 JwB
|__J Mine Lease Boundary
Interpolated Ra-226 Greater than 2 pCi/g
I j TENORM Boundary
Interpolated Ra-226 (pCi/g)
1 1 < 2.0 s BTV
2.0 - 4.0 1 x BTV " 2 x BTV
~ 4.0 - 6.0 2 x BTV - 3 x BTV
6.0-8.0 3 x BTV - 4 x BTV
8.0-10 4 x BTV - 5 x BTV
>10 >5 xBTV
Surface Soil Samples - Ra-226
O Below RAG of 2 pCi/g
O Above RAG of 2 pCi/g
Notes:
BTV
Background threshold value
CR-1E
Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1 East
Mine Site
pCi/g
Picocurie per gram
RAG
Removal action goal
Ra-226
Radium-226
TENORM
Technologically enhanced naturally
occurring radioactive material
1 inch = 300 feet
1:3,600
300 150 0
W
N
-fE
300
~ Feet
CR-1E CORRELATED AND
LABORATORY RA-226
RESULTS IN SURFACE SOILS
Prepared For: U.S. EPA Region 9
i^t)
PfiCtf*-'"'
Prepared By:
TETRATECH
Task Order No.:
000 1
QUIVIRA MINES
Contract No.:
68HE0923D0002
3/6/2024
Coordinate System:
NAD 1983 State Plane New Mexico West
FIPS 3003 Feet Transverse Mercator
Figure No.:
18
-------
Navajo Nation
Navajo Nation
United Nuclear
^Corporation
United Nuclear
Corporation
Prepared By:
TETRATECH
Background threshold value
Kerr-McGee Corporation
Picocurie per gram
Removal action goal
Radium-226
Navajo Nation
Technologically enhanced naturally
occurring radioactive material
United Nuclear Corporation
-
Notes:
BTV
Kerr-McGee
pCi/g
RAG
Ra-226
NN
TENORM
UNC
Kerr-McGee Ponds
Investigation Boundary
Kerr-McGee Ponds Fenceline
UNC Site Boundary
~ Contamination Associated with a
UNC Site Further to the Southeast
Interpolated Ra-226 Greater than 2 pCi/g
Interpolated Ra-226 Greater than 5.4 pCi/g, which
is Based on a UNC Worker Exposure Scenario
I j TENORM Boundary
Interpolated Ra-226 (pCi/g)
I | < 2.0 - BTV
~ 2.0 - 4.0 1 x BTV - 1 x BTV
~ 4.0 - 6.0 1 x BTV - 2 x BTV
6.0-8,0 2 x BTV - 4 x BTV
8.0-10 4 x BTV - 5 x BTV
>10 > 5 x BTV
Surface Soil Samples - Ra-226
Below NN RAG of 2.0 pCi/g
or UNC RAG of 5.4 pCi/g
Above NN RAG of 2.0 pCi/g
or UNC RAG of 5.4 pCi/g
1 inch = 500 feet
1:6,000
KERR-MCGEE PONDS
CORRELATED AND
LABORATORY RA-226
RESULTS IN SURFACE SOILS
Prepared For: U.S. EPA Region 9
.-ttDSr*.
\sh}
r
QUIVIRA MINES
3/4/2024
Coordinate System:
NAD 1983 State Plane New Mexico West
FIPS 3003 Feet Transverse Mercator
Figure No.:
Task Order No.:
000 1
Contract No.:
68HE0923D0002
-------
Prepared By:
TETRATECH
I I Mine Lease Boundary
L3*J TENORM Boundary
Surface Soil Samples1 - Ra-226
O Below RAG of 2 pCi/g
O CR-1 Sample Above RAG of 2 pCi/g
O Arroyo Sample Above RAG of 2 pCi/g
Subsurface Soil Samples2 - Ra-226
_ Below RAG of 2 pCi/g
Q CR-1 Sample Above RAG of 2 pCi/g
Arroyo Sample Above RAG of 2 pCi/g
Note:
"Surface soil samples are 0 to 6 inches below grade.
2Subsurface soil samples are 6 to 72 inches below
grade.
CR-1 Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1
Mine Site
pCi/g Picocurie per gram
RAG Removal action goal
Ra-226 Radium-226
TENORM Technologically enhanced naturally
occurring radioactive material
1 inch = 400 feet
1:4,800
~ Feet
CR-1 DISTRIBUTION
OF RA-226 IN SURFACE
AND SUBSURFACE SOILS
Prepared For: U.S. EPA Region 9
l#7l
Task Order No.:
000 1
Contract No.:
68HE0923D0002
QUIVIRA MINES
3/4/2024
Coordinate System:
NAD 1983 State Plane New Mexico West
FIPS 3003 Feet Transverse Mercator
Figure No.:
-------
6-7.5 ft
1.16
7.5-9 ft
0.86
9-10.5 ft
1.24
10.5-12 ft
1.23
10.5-12 ft
1.01.
12-13.5 ft
y?
9-10.5 ft
1.12
13.5-15 ft
1.35
19.5-21 ft
1.08
30-31.5 ft
1.01
40-41.5 ft
1.08
45-46.5 ft
1.06
6-7.5 ft
11.6
7.5-9 ft
1.6
7.5-9 ft
1.31
9-10.5 ft
1.54
10.5-12 ft
1.29
12-13.5 ft
0.96
i3.5-15 ft
1.44
15-16.5 ft
1.44
15-16.5 ft
1.36
16.5-18 ft
1.87
18-19.5 ft
1.52
r — ^
_ 36-37.5 fl
"t ~*33S9T.9ft
/
/ t
S J
/
6-7.5 ft
1.19
7.5-9 ft
1.52
9-10.5 ft
1.06
10.5-12 ft
1.54
12-13.5 ft
1.17
13.5-15 ft
1.45
15-16.5 ft
1.47
15-16.5 ft
1.4
16.5-18 ft
1.45
16.5-18 ft
1.46
18-19.5 ft
1.5
19.5-21 ft
1.23
21-22.5 ft
1.5
22.5-24 ft
1.45
5-6.5 ft
95 -
10-11.5 ft
7.6
15-16.5 ft
26.5
20-21.5 ft
3.46
25-26.5 ft
3.56
2&£6.5ft
2.71
^ 30-31?&t
5.06
35-36.5 ft
1.63
5-6.5 ft
41.9
/ —
5-6.5 ft
42.9 -
10-10.75 ft
31.2
15-16.5 ft
67
15-16.5 ft
59.1
5-6.5 ft
43.6
20-21.5 ft
50.9
10-11.5 ft
56.9
25-26.5 ft
51.6
15-16.5 ft
70.9
30-31.5 ft
5.15
15-16.5 ft
70.9
30-31.5 ft
4.97
20-21.5 ft
56.1
35-36.5 ft
4.83
25-26.5 ft
53.3
40-41.5 ft
4.89
30-31.5 ft
77
45.5-46.5 ft
18.8
35-36.5 ft
71.3
50-51.5 ft
5.69
35-36.5 ft
73.5
40-41.5 ft
59.2
45-46.5 ft
69.3
45-46.5 ft
79.2
50-51.5 ft
43.3
55-56.5 ft
11.8
57.5-59 ft
2.96
""e-fSTt
—
68.9
6-7.5 ft
7.5-9 ft
328
9-10.5 ft
472
10.5-12 ft
10.9
12-13.5 ft
3.51
12-13.5 ft
3.09
6-7.5 ft
1.51
7.5-9 ft
1.2
9-10.5 ft
1.06
9-10.5 ft
1.09
10.5-12 ft
1.26
6-7.5 ft
3.67
10.5-12 ft
0.97
- 7.5-9 ft
1.34
12-13.5 ft
1.11
9-10.5 ft
1.48
13.5-15 ft
1.76
10.5-12 ft
1.58
15-16.5 ft
1.47
12-13.5 ft
1.44
15-16.5 ft
1.18
13.5-15 ft
1.39
16.5-18 ft
1.56
15-16.5 ft
1.37
18-19.5 ft
1.35
15-16.5 ft
1.24
19.5-21 ft
1.58
16.5-18 ft
1.66
21-22.5 ft
1.35
18-19.5 ft
1.54
22.5-24 ft
1.44
24-25.5 ft
1.19
^ 6-7.5 ft
1.29
6-7.5 ft
1.52
7.5-9 ft
2.81
9-10.5 ft
0.95
9-10.5 ft
0.94
10.5-12 ft
1.6
12-13.5 ft
1.74
13.5-15 ft
1.42
15-16.5 ft
1.5
16.5-18 ft
1.54
18-19.5 ft
1.34
^3^5 ft
7.5-feit
9-10.51
9-10.5 ft|
10.5-12 ft
10.5-12 ft
13.5-15 ft
15-16.5 ft
16.5-18 ft
18-19.5 ft
6-7.5 ft
7.5-9 ft
— 9-10.5 ft
10.5-12 ft
12-13.5 ft
6-7.5 ft
1.1
13.5-15 ft
—
6-7.5 ft
1.3
13.5-15 ft
—
7.5-9 ft
1.11
15-16.5 ft
—
9-10.5 ft
1.76
15-16.5 ft
10.5-12 ft
1.6
16.5-18 ft
—
12-13.5 ft
1.19
18-19.5 ft
—
13.5-15 ft
1.31
—
15-16.5 ft
1.33
16.5-18 ft
1.65
18-19.5 ft
1.22
Notes:
CR-1
Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1
Mine Site
ft
Foot
pCi/g
Picocurie per gram
Ra-226
Radium-226
TENORM
Technologically enhanced naturally
occurring radioactive material
© Soil Sample Location
I I 100-Foot Step-Out Boundary
I I Mine Lease Boundary
LTj TENORM Boundary
Borehole Legend
Depth
Range
Lab
Result
(pCi/g)
Color
Illustrative Data Ranges
Ra-226
(pCi/g)
Above 100
50 to 100
20 to 50
10 to 20
2 to 10
Description
Above 50x Removal Action
Goal
Up to 50x Removal Action
Goal
Up to 25x Removal Action
Goal
Up to 10x Removal Action
Goal
Up to 5x Removal Action
Goal
1:3,000
250 125
Below 2 Below Removal Action Goal
N
S
1 inch - 250 feet
250
I Feet
CR-1 WASTE PILE
VERTICAL EXTENT
OF RA-226 AT DEPTHS
GREATER THAN 6 FEET
BELOW GRADE
Prepared For: U.S. EPA Region 9
{&)
Prepared By:
TETRATECH
Task Order No.:
000 1
Location:
QUIVIRA MINES
Contract No.:
68HE0923D0002
3/4/2024
Coordinate System:
NAD 1983 State Plane New Mexico West
FIPS 3003 Feet Transverse Mercator
Figure No.:
21
-------
I I Mine Lease Boundary
U"j TENORM Boundary
Surface Soil Samples1 - Ra-226
O Below RAG of 2 pCi/g
O CR-1E Sample Above RAG of 2 pCi/g
O Arroyo Sample Above RAG of 2 pCi/g
Subsurface Soil Samples2 - Ra-226
_ Below RAG of 2 pCi/g
Q CR-1 E Sample Above RAG of 2 pCi/g
Arroyo Sample Above RAG of 2 pCi/g
Note:
1Surface soil samples are 0 to 6 inches below grade.
2Subsurface soil samples are 6 to 72 inches below
grade.
CR-1E Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1 East
Mine Site
pCi/g Picocurie per gram
RAG Removal action goal
Ra-226 Radium-226
TENORM Technologically enhanced naturally
occurring radioactive material
1 inch = 250 feet
1:3,000
250 125 0
N
W E
S
250
! Feet
CR-1 E DISTRIBUTION OF
RA-226 IN SURFACE
AND SUBSURFACE SOILS
Prepared For: U.S. EPA Region 9
0§z)
%
Prepared By:
TETRATECH
Task Order No.:
000 1
Contract No.:
68HE0923D0002
QUIVIRA MINES
3/4/2024
Coordinate System:
Figure No.:
NAD 1983 State Plane New Mexico West
FIPS 3003 Feet Transverse Mercator
22
-------
I
V /
Notes:
CR-1E Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1 East
Mine Site
ft Foot
pCi/g Picocurie per gram
Ra-226 Radium-226
TENORM Technologically enhanced naturally
occurring radioactive material
© Soil Sample Location
i i 100-Foot Step-Out Boundary
[ ] Mine Lease Boundary
L J TENORM Boundary
Borehole Legend
Depth
Range
Lab
Result
(pCi/g)
Color
Illustrative Data Ranges
Ra-226
(pCi/g)
Above 50x Removal Action
Description
Above 100
50 to 100
20 to 50
10 to 20
2 to 10
Goal
Up to 50x Removal Action
Goal
Up to 25x Removal Action
Goal
Up to 10x Removal Action
Goal
Up to 5x Removal Action
Goal
1:1,800
150 75
Below 2 Below Removal Action Goal
N
S
1 inch - 150 feet
150
I Feet
CR-1E VERTICAL EXTENT
OF RA-226 AT DEPTHS
GREATER THAN 6 FEET
BELOW GRADE
Prepared For: U.S. EPA Region 9
{&)
Prepared By:
TETRATECH
Task Order No.:
000 1
Location:
QUIVIRA MINES
Contract No.:
68HE0923D0002
3/4/2024
Coordinate System:
NAD 1983 State Plane New Mexico West
FIPS 3003 Feet Transverse Mercator
Figure No.:
23
-------
NAVAJO
NAT
ON
UN
NUGL EAR
»s
GORPORAT
(5" La
>y /'
/' /
//7 / "
/
// - /
//
-
|7« *
.
X
\\
\ \
/
.
*
U
*
JM" .2,
~
*
/«
Kerr-McGee Ponds
Investigation Boundary
I I Kerr-McGee Ponds Fenceline
United Nuclear Corporation Site Boundary
LJ*j TENORM Boundary
Surface Soil Samples1 - Ra-226
O Below RAG of 2 pCi/g
Kerr-McGee Ponds Sample on Navajo
® Nation Above RAG of 2 pCi/g
O Arroyo Sample Above RAG of 2 pCi/g
Subsurface Soil Samples2 - Ra-226
l~l Below RAG of 2 pCi/g
Kerr-McGee Ponds Sample on Navajo
Nation Above RAG of 2 pCi/g
Arroyo Sample Above RAG of 2 pCi/g
1 inch = 300 feet
1:3,600
300 150 0
KERR-MCGEE PONDS
DISTRIBUTION OF RA-226
ABOVE 2 PCI/G IN SURFACE
AND SUBSURFACE SOILS
Prepared For: U.S. EPA Region 9
Note:
1Surface soil samples are 0 to 6 inches below grade.
2Subsurface soil samples are 6 to 72 inches below
grade.
Kerr-McGee
Kerr-McGee Corporation
pCi/g
Picocurie per gram
RAG
Removal action goal
Ra-226
Radium-226
TENORM
Technologically enhanced naturally
occurring radioactive material
Prepared By:
Task Order No.:
QUIVIRA MINES
iSz)
% -Kit**
TETRATECH
Contract No.:
68HE0923D0002
3/4/2024
Coordinate System:
NAD 1983 State Plane New Mexico West
FIPS 3003 Feet Transverse Mercator
Figure No.:
-------
Prepared By:
TETRATECH
KERR-MCGEE PONDS
DISTRIBUTION OF RA-226
ABOVE 5,4 PCI/G IN
SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE SOILS
Prepared For: U.S. EPA Region 9
Q8z>
Coordinate System:
NAD 1983 State Plane New Mexico West
FIPS 3003 Feet Transverse Mercator
Figure No.:
Task Order No.:
Contract No.:
68HE0923D0002
1 inch = 220 feet
1:2,640
220 110 0
Location:
QUIVIRA MINES
Date:
3/4/2024
Kerr-McGee Ponds
Investigation Boundary
I I Kerr-McGee Ponds Fenceline
LTj TENORM Boundary
Surface Soil Samples1 - Ra-226
O Below RAG of 5.4 pCi/g
O Above RAG of 5.4 pCi/g
Subsurface Soil Samples2 - Ra-226
Below RAG of 5.4 pCi/g
Above RAG of 5.4 pCi/g
Note:
'Surface soil samples are 0 to 6 inches below grade.
2Subsurface soil samples are 6 to 72 inches below
grade.
Kerr-McGee Kerr-McGee Corporation
pCi/g Picocurie per gram
RAG Removal action goal
Ra-226 Radium-226
TENORM Technologically enhanced naturally
occurring radioactive material
-------
9.5-10 ft 0.
19.5-20 ft ^rf.95
U&13TT 1.3
9.5-10 ft 0.74
.5-15 ft 1.38
6.5-7 ft 0.91
9.5-10 ft 0.7
-KM P-SB43
KMP-SB45
KMP-SB44
^ >—14.5-15 ft 1.33
?r
KMP-SB46
.5-8 ft 0.93
ft 1.3
Color
Illustrative Data Ranges - Navajo Nation
Ra-226
(pCi/g) Description
Above 50x Removal Action
Above 100 „ .!
Goal
50 to 100
20 to 50
10 to 20
2 to 10
Up to 50x Removal Action
Goal
Up to 25x Removal Action
Goal
Up to 10x Removal Action
Goal
Up to 5x Removal Action
Goal
Below 2 Below Removal Action Goal
Navajo Nation
United Nuclear
Corporation Site
Illustrative Data Ranges - UNC Property
Color
Ra-226
{pCi/g)
Above 200
100 to 200
40 to 100
20 to 40
5.4 to 20
Below 5.4
Description
Above 37x Outdoor Worker
Screening Level
Up to 37x Outdoor Worker
Screening Level
Up to 18.5x Outdoor Worker
Screening Level
Up to 7.4x Outdoor Worker
Screening Level
Up to 3.7x Outdoor Worker
Screening Level
Below Outdoor Worker
Screening Level
© Soil Sample Location
UNC Mill Boundary
II I Kerr-McGee Ponds Investigation Boundary
I I Kerr-McGee Pond Fenceline
j_""j TENORM Boundary
Borehole Legend
Depth
Range
Lab
Result
(pCi/g)
Notes:
1Removai Action Goal of 2.0 pCi/g is based on the
background threshold value for Ra-226. The background
threshold value is based on the 95 percent upper tolerance
limit with 95 percent coverage of the background dataset.
ft Foot
Kerr-McGee Kerr-McGee Corporation
pCi/g Picocurie per gram
Ra-226 Radium-226
TENORM Technologically enhanced naturally
occurring radioactive material
UNC United Nuclear Corporation
1 inch - 150 feet
1:1,800
150 75 0
N
S
150
I Feet
KERR-MCGEE PONDS
VERTICAL EXTENT OF
RA-226 AT DEPTHS
GREATER THAN 6 FEET
BELOW GRADE
Prepared For: U.S. EPA Region 9
% M*#
Prepared By:
TETRATECH
Task Order No.:
000 1
Location:
QUIVIRA MINES
Contract No.:
68HE0923D0002
3/6/2024
Coordinate System:
NAD 1983 State Plane New Mexico West
FIPS 3003 Feet Transverse Mercator
Figure No.:
26
-------
AIR AND OUST
INHALATION
Pfffp!
w
PROCESSING
DIRECT SOIL
EXPOSURE
GARDEN PRODUCE
M H II
nil mm
mi ifii imti
GROUNDWATER
AQUATIC
FOODS
SURFACE
WATER USE
SEDIMENT
EXPOSURE
GATHERED
FOODS
Notes:
Some exposure pathways depicted above are not included in the exposure assessment. See the conceptual site model wire
diagrams (Figure 13) for a description of the included pathways.
Adapted from Harper and others (2007).
Prepared for: U.S. EPA Region 9
Prepared By:
TETRATECH
"It
GRAPHIC DEPICTION OF NAVAJO RESIDENTIAL EXPOSURE
PATHWAYS INCLUDING THE DINE LIFEWAYS
Task Order No.:
TO 0001
Location:
NAVAJO NATION
Contract No.:
68HE0923D0002
Date:
2/21/24
Figure No:
27
-------
Pond
Pond 1
Pond 4
Pond 1a
Pond 3
Notes:
"Waste pile removal depth was variable but
generally extends to bedrock. A separate cut and fill
analysis is being conducted in CAD 3D to assess
waste pile volume.
2Removal extent is based on correlated and laboratory
Ra-226 and uranium data exceeding removal action goals.
CR-1 Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1 Mine Site
ft Foot
Ra-226 Radium-226
TENORM Technologically enhanced naturally
occurring radioactive material
Pond
I I Mine Lease Boundary
L3*J TENORM Boundary
I I Waste Pile Removal Action Extent1
I 0 Former Pond
Removal Action Extent Depth (ft)2
I I 1
pr ^
L\«r .
Pond 6a ^
m-kk-
r ;lk»3
1 inch = 200 feet
1:2,400
200 100 C
CR-1 SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE
REMOVAL ACTION EXTENT
Prepared For: U.S. EPA Region 9
(&)
Prepared By:
TETRATECH
Task Order No.:
QUIVIRA MINES
Contract No.:
68HE0923D0002
3/4/2024
Coordinate System:
NAD 1983 State Plane New Mexico West
FIPS 3003 Feet Transverse Mercator
Figure No.:
-------
Prepared By:
TETRATECH
CR-1E SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE
REMOVAL ACTION EXTENT
Prepared For: U.S. EPA Region 9
($Sz>
Task Order No.:
0001
Contract No.:
68HE0923D0002
QUIVIRA MINES
3/4/2024
Coordinate System:
NAD 1983 State Plane New Mexico West
FIPS 3003 Feet Transverse Mercator
Figure No.:
I I Mine Lease Boundary
L~j TENORM Boundary
I I Waste Pile Removal Action Extent1
Removal Action Extent Depth (ft)2
I I 1
m 1-5
2.5
~ 5
Notes:
1Waste pile removal depth is variable but
generally extends to bedrock. A separate cut and fill
analysis is being conducted in CAD 3D to assess
waste pile volume,
2Removal extent is based on correlated and
laboratory Ra-226 and uranium data exceeding
removal action goals.
CR-1E Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1 East
Mine Site
ft Foot
Ra-226 Radium-226
TENORM Technologically enhanced naturally
occurring radioactive material
1 inch = 140 feet N
w
1:1,680
s
140 70 0 140
~i Feet
-------
United Nuclealr*
Corporation Site
4 ^"Spsjpi
>
fcr]^w *
s
>
1¥/ ill ^ "iJ.-*;
^$SK
/
/
* e *'-'
,j i i ,.'!"
dBP1.
ul
Kerr-McGee Ponds
Investigation Boundary
Kerr-McGee Ponds Fenceline
UNC Site Boundary
Contamination Associated with a
UNC Site Further to the Southeast
| | TENORM Boundary
Navajo Nation Removal Action Extent Depth (ft)12
~ 2
Navajo Nation I UNC Removal Action Extent Depth (ft)1
1 inch = 140 feet
1:1,680
140 70
KERR-MCGEE PONDS
SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE
REMOVAL ACTION EXTENT
Notes:
'Removal extent is based on correlated and
laboratory Ra-226 and uranium data exceeding
RAGs on Navajo Nation and Ra-226, U-234,
and U-238 on UNC Property.
2Removal action extent is based off the Ra-226
RAG of 2.0 pCi/g.
3Removal action extent is based off the Ra-226
RAG of 5.4 pCi/g.
ft Foot
Kerr-McGee Kerr-McGee Corporation
pCi/g Picocurie per gram
Removal action goal
Radium-226
Technologically enhanced naturally
occurring radioactive material
Uranium-234
Uranium-238
United Nuclear Corporation
~
Prepared For: U.S. EPA Region 9
Prepared By:
Task Order No.:
TETRATECH
Contract No.:
68HE0923D0002
RAG
Ra-226
TENORM
U-234
U-238
UNC
QUIVIRA MINES
3/4/2024
Coordinate System:
NAD 1983 State Plane New Mexico West
FIPS 3003 Feet Transverse Mercator
Figure No.:
-------
STANDING ROCK CHAPTER
Kerr-McGee Ponds
United Nuclear Corporation
(Private Property)^H
I
• "r ' *"V
. * '¦ \ *r\.
*?*»¦.£ "iw.
~ *#** * '
Ufmspm: • Bfe.
:¦ - :^vNv, • • • ' ¦ ir-
— 1
ss
Mr*
• « *• / , "/•' * »'* * V£\* S* * VV *» " 7 .% * * -A £ * s '
; ¦¦¦¦¦ .
S««»t-h<,m»d I a,„.hom,d I
Hk'vat?*
ca.
s>f
¦/J'' ii^L
>r*
¦y
COYOTE CANYON CHAPTER
PINEDALE CHAPTER
Ow
-—
2
# Biologia! Observation
Proposed Access Road
Existing Road
I I Mine Lease Boundary
United Nuclear Corporation Site
Boundary (Private Property)
Northeast Church Rock Mine Boundary
Navajo Nation Chapter Boundary
Proposed Soii Borrow Area
Proposed Laydown Area
I I Kerr-McGee Ponds Fenceiine
Kerr-McGee Ponds
Investigation Boundary
Proposed CR-1 and CR-1E
Removal Action Extent
Kerr-McGee Ponds Proposed
Removal Action Extent
I 111 Biological Exclusion Zone - 660 feet
¦ m. Sensitive habitat with strong potential
kis-a for Naturita milk-vetch to occur
b&^l Habitation Area Exclusion Area
Cultural Exclusion Area
Cultural Resource Field Cleared Areas
1 inch = 800 feet
1:9,600
3 400 800
PROPOSED LAYDOWN AREA,
ACCESS ROADS,
AND EXCLUSION AREAS
Prepared For: U.S. EPA Region 9
Prepared By:
TETRA TECH
*<* pm0^
Task Order No.:
Contract No.:
68HE0923D0002
Notes:
CR-1 Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1 Mine Site
CR-1E Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1 East Mine Site
Kerr-McGee Kerr-McGee Corporation
"-***¦ " ¦ I I--.
Location:
QUIVIRA MINES
Coordinate System:
NAD 1983 State Plane New Mexico
West FIPS 3003 Feet Tansverse
3/4/2024
Figure No.:
31
-------
taw - Mu - >
Canyon Respository
7'.'
STANDING ROCK CHAPTER
PINEDALE CHAPTER
Kerr-McGee Ponds
Prepared By:
TETRATECH
1999 Harrison Street, Suite 500
Oakland, CA94612
[ I Mine Lease Boundary
United Nuclear Corporation Site
Boundary (Private Property)
Navajo Nation Chapter Boundary
Kerr-McGee Ponds Fenceline
Proposed Laydown Area
Kerr-McGee Ponds
Investigation Boundary
Potential Soil Borrow Area to Be Used
for Waste Cap and Site Restoration
Proposed Access Road
Existing Road
Removal Action Extent
Proposed On-site Consolidation Area1
Notes:
'Only one on-site consolidation area will be used.
CR-1 Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1
Mine Site
CR-1E Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1
East Mine Site
Kerr-McGee Kerr-McGee Corporation
1 inch = 500 feet
1:6,000
500 250 0 500
~i Feet
ALTERNATIVE 2
WASTE EXCAVATION, TRANSFER,
AND ONSITE CONSOLIDATION
Prepared For: U.S. EPA Region 9
(A)
Task Order No.:
000 1
Contract No.:
68HE0923D0002
Location:
QUIVIRA MINES
3/6/2024
Coordinate System:
NAD 1983 State Plane New Mexico West
FIPS 3003 Feet Transverse Mercator
Figure No.:
-------
CR/IE
Canyon
Respository,
COYOTE CANYON CHAPTER
STANDING ROCKxCHAPTER
PINEDALE CHAPTER
Notes:
1Only one onsite consolidation area will be used.
CR-1 Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1 Mine Site
CR-1E Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1 East Mine Site
Kerr-McGee Kerr-McGee Corporation
Drainage
Remove Access Road and Restore Surface
— - Existing Road
Permanent Fencing with Gate to Allow
x ~~ Rotational Grazing
X — Temporary Fencing
Kerr-McGee Ponds
Investigation Boundary
I I Kerr-McGee Ponds Fenceline
|__| Mine Lease Boundary
United Nuclear Corporation Site
Boundary (Private Property)
Navajo Nation Chapter Boundary
If I Arroyo
~ Restore Borrow Areas
Restore Laydown Area
Potential Onsite Repository1
Site Restoration Area
1 inch = 700 feet
N
1:8,400 f
s
700 350 0 700
~ Feet
ALTERNATIVE 2
WASTE CAPPING AND
SITE RESTORATION
Prepared For: U.S. EPA Region 9
Q\
Prepared By:
TETRATECH
Task Order No.:
000 1
Contract No.:
68HE0923D0002
Location:
QUIVIRA MINES
3/1 4/2024
Coordinate System:
NAD 1983 State Plane New Mexico West
FIPS 3003 Feet Transverse Mercator
Figure No.:
33
-------
m •
f- - > z -
^'3tf9$T&-ij '"T V^-t "5T5^i
- ^ ~, -. ^ 3? " ¦ S^^V4 -
_^x._.
" ^
' / K.. ¦
EVAPOTRANSPIRATION CAP
GRADED TO CAPTURE AND
INFILTRATE PRECIPITATION
r^m^
wm
-¦?*.¦* ¦ v<*..
sH
Ml
• • v - ,..'
SsiS^I - • ' 'i... *'
'- l ' K~iuSr
te - ... > - v ¦¦ • I
•* • - . • • . I ¦ %.
SSSIPI-'- ':¦-¦¦ • Il31
.-¦'. ¦ 'U- '"-. 1 ¦»* « • *•. JBwMflrag
>¦'. V •' K ' ;
Prepared for: U.S. EPA Region £
LEGEND
EVAPOTRANSPIRATION CAP AND CONTOURS
RUNOFF FLOW PATH
DRAINAGE CONTROL DITCHES
o
SEz
Prepared by:
TETRATECH
*> *
y
- ¦ ' ' 4S -
" - '
1 ^
ALTERNATIVE 2
TYPICAL WASTE CONSOLIDATION AREA FEATURES
Task Order No.:
TO 0001
QUIVIRA MINES
Contract No
68HE0923D0002
02/21/24
Figure No.:
34
-------
r-^—:¦——
3Jk L-nJI
¦ - vs
1856
\\
\ cy
\5
a>
v..a
^ a!*-' -J' 'M
¦ «V. ¦ •,"*% f -£ , . *T »_• ; ."*»'¦ -
r ?/. W&&M
COYOTE CANYON CHAPTER /
ufi " *
¦t
.« ^
':.- "T »
*>
/<"
^ \ •X\?vk/ >L^vN
W/
-------
Remove Access Road and Restore Surface
Existing Road
X — Temporary Fencing
[ | Mine Lease Boundary
Kerr-McGee Ponds
Investigation Boundary
I I Kerr-McGee Ponds Fenceline
United Nuclear Corporation Site Boundary
Navajo Nation Chapter Boundary
[ | Arroyo
Restore Borrow Area
Restore Laydown Area
Site Restoration Area
Notes:
CR-1 Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1
Mine Site
CR-1E Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1
East Mine Site
Kerr-McGee Kerr-McGee Corporation
1 inch = 700 feet
1:8,400
700 350 0
N
W E
S
700
~ Feet
ALTERNATIVES 3 AND 4
SITE RESTORATION
Prepared For: U.S. EPA Region 9
•>
($)
m nut**
Prepared By:
TETRATECH
1999 Harrison Street, Suite 500
Oakland, CA94612
Task Order No.:
000 1
Location:
QUIVIRA MINES
Contract No.:
68HE0923D0002
3/4/2024
Coordinate System:
NAD 1983 State Plane New Mexico West
FIPS 3003 Feet Transverse Mercator
Figure No.:
36
-------
Crownpoint
North Route via HWY N11-49
Proposed Haul Route to
Red Rocks Disposal Facility
Paved: 34.6 miles - from CR-1
34 miles - from CR-1E
Unpaved: 2.7 miles - from CR-1
3.5 miles - from CR-1E
Pinedale
Mariano Lake
rChurch Rock
ftjujrch Rock
Rehoboth
lyanbito
Thoreau
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane New Mexico West FIPS 3003 FeetTransverse Mercator
Prepared By:
TETRATECH
Task Order No.: 0001
Contract No.:
68HE0923D0002
Location:
MCKINLEY COUNTY, NEW MEXICO
Date:
3/4/2024
Figure No.:
37
Haul Route Type A CR-1 arid CR-1 E
Paved £ Kerr-McGee Porids
—* Unpaved q QjSp0sal Facility
— Recommended Route a ..
Chapter House
Prepared for: U.S. EPA Region 9
ALTERNATIVE 3 HAUL ROUTES FROM QUIVIRA MINES
TO RED ROCK DISPOSAL FACILITY
Notes:
CR-1 Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1 Mine Si^=
CR-1 E Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1 East Mine Site
HWY Highway
Kerr-McGee Kerr-McGee Corporation
4
"* Miles
Fort Wingate
Recommended South Route via
I-40 Proposed Haul Route to Red
Rocks Disposal Facility
Paved: 40.7 miles - from CR-1
40.2 miles - from CR-1 E
Unpaved: 2.7 miles - from CR-1
3.5 miles - from CR-1E
Disposal
Facility
Smith Lake
... ~
Smith Lake
Red Rock
-------
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane New Mexico West FIPS 3003 FeetTransverse Mercator
—______
CR-1 —v y— CR-1E Crcwnpoint M
CR-1 Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1 Mine Site
CR-1E Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1 East Mine Site
Kerr-MCGee • Keir-MCGee corpftfatiorT ¦ —-
|__| Office
i i Scale House
Proposed Red Rocks Mine
Waste Disposal Area
Existing Red Rocks Landfill
I ' Facility
Facility Boundary
~ CR-1 and CR-1 E
A Kerr-McGee Ponds
O Red Rocks Disposal Facility
Haul Route Type
Paved
Recommended Route
Existing Haul Road
New Haul Road
Prepared for: U.S. EPA Region 9
y,,B
w
Prepared By:
^ TETRATECH
ALTERNATIVE 3 OFFSITE DISPOSAL AT
PROPOSED RED ROCKS FACILITY
Task Order No.:
0001
Location:
MCKINLEY COUNTY, NEW MEXICO
Contract No.:
68HG0923D0002
3/4/2024
Figure No.:
38
-------
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane New Mexico West FIPS 3003 FeetTransverse Mercator
Boulder
ettver
Deer Tra Landf
and
iction
Quivira Mines to 1-40
Proposed Haul Route to
Interstate 40
Paved: 8.4 miles - from CR-1 and CR-1E
Unpaved: 3.5 miles - from CR-1
3.7 miles - from CR-1 E
ueblo
Farmingtcn
Church Rock to Deer Trail, CO
Proposed Haul Route to
Deer Trail Disposal Facility
Paved: 613 miles
Inset Extent
Santa Fe
Amarillo
buquerque
Miles
Haul Route Type A CR-1 arid CR-1 E
Paved A Kerr-McGee Ponds
—Unpaved ® Landfi|]
Recommended Route
Prepared for: U.S. EPA Region 9
ALTERNATIVE 4 HAUL ROUTE FROM QUIVIRA MINES TO
DEER TRAIL, COLORADO, DISPOSAL FACILITY
Prepared By:
-|^ TETRATECH
Task Order No.: 0001
Contract No.:
68IIE0923D0002
Figure No.:
39
Location:
MCKINLEY COUNTY, NEW MEXICO
Date:
3/4/2024
-------
Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane New Mexico West FIPS 3003 FeetTransverse Mercator
fjep} Farmington
Church Rock to Andrews, TX
Proposed Haul Route to
V\foste Control Specialists LLC
Paved: 489 miles
Prepared By:
Task Order No.: 0001
Contract No.:
68HE0923D0002
Location:
MCKINLEY COUNTY, NEW MEXICO
Date:
3/4/2024
Figure No.:
40
Haul Route Type
Paved
Unpaved
• Preferred Route
A CR-1 arid CR-1E
A Kerr-McGee Porids
© Landfill
Prepared for: U.S. EPA Region 9
HAUL ROUTE FROM QUIVIRA MINES TO WASTE CONTROL
SPECIALISTS, ANDREWS, TEXAS, DISPOSAL FACILITY
Waste Control
Specialists
LuUlioeK
Midland
jy
Odessa
Quivira Mines to I-40
Proposed Haul Route to
Interstate 40
8.4 miles - from CR-1 and CR-1 E
Unpaved: 3.5 miles - from CR-1
3.7 miles - from CR-1 E
Tucson
-------
TABLES
-------
Table 1. Mine Features and Dimensions for Quivira Mines
Feature
Reclamation
Status
Reclamation Description
Dimensions
Quivira Church Rock No. 1 Mine (CR-1)
Shaft
Reclaimed
Sediments and waste rock were placed in shaft, grizzlies were
placed over all openings, and the shaft was capped with a 4-foot
concrete cap.
14 feet in diameter
Adit
Reclaimed
Infilled with rock and closed.
Undocumented
Waste Rock and
Former Ponds 1 to 3
Reclaimed
Sediments were excavated and placed in shaft.
15.4 acres
Former Industrial Area North
Reclaimed
Mine equipment and buildings were removed and foundations
destroyed.
4.7 acres
Former Industrial Area
Central
Reclaimed
Mine equipment and buildings were removed and foundations
destroyed.
1.5 acres
Former Industrial Area East
Reclaimed
Mine equipment and buildings were removed and foundations
destroyed.
0.7 acre
Former Ponds 4 and 5
Reclaimed
Sediments were excavated and placed in shaft.
3.6 acres
Former Pond 6
Reclaimed
Sediments were excavated and placed in shaft.
2.6 acres
Step-Out Areas
Unreclaimed
No reclamation completed.
8.5 acres
RWPR Waste
Reclaimed
Excavated and consolidated on CR-1 with soil cover.
1.2 acres
17,374 cubic yards
Vent Flole / Bridge Abutment
Waste
Reclaimed
Excavated and consolidated on CR-1 with soil cover.
4.7 acres
10,293 cubic yards
Page 1 of 2
-------
Table 1. Mine Features and Dimensions for Quivira Mines
Feature
Reclamation
Status
Reclamation Description
Dimensions
Quivira Church Rock No. 1 East Mine (CR-1E)
Shaft
Reclaimed
Sediments and waste rock were placed in shaft, grizzlies were
placed over all openings, and the shaft was capped with a 4-foot
concrete cap.
12 feet in diameter
Adit 1
Reclaimed
Infilled with rock; partially open.
Undocumented
Adit 2
Reclaimed
Infilled with rock; partially open.
Undocumented
Waste Rock and
Former Pond
Reclaimed
Waste rock consolidated into two piles. Pond sediment was
excavated and placed in shaft.
5 acres
Former Industrial Area North
Reclaimed
Mine equipment and buildings were removed and foundations
destroyed.
1.8 acres
Former Industrial Area South
Reclaimed
Mine equipment and buildings were removed and foundations
destroyed.
0.3 acre
Step-Out Areas
Unreclaimed
No reclamation completed.
2.9 acres
Kerr-McGee Corporation Ponds
Former Ponds
Reclaimed
Unlined pond berms were knocked down.
0.47 acre
Former Stockpile Area
Reclaimed
Proto-ore stockpile was removed.
1.1 acres
31,060 cubic yards
Equipment Storage Area
Reclaimed
Equipment was removed.
3.73 acres
Note:
RWPR Red Water Pond Road
Page 2 of 2
-------
Table 2. Comparison of Quivira Surface Soil with Bartlett Barren Member of Crevasse Canyon Formation (BSA-2) Background Surface Soil
coc
Church Rock No. 1
Mine Soil
(0-6 inch bgs)
BSA-2 Soil
(0-6 inch bgs)
Two-Population Statistical Tests
Final
Conclusion
for
Background
Screen
Sample Size
Detection
Frequency
(Percent)
Sample Size
Detection
Frequency
(Percent)
Gehana
Ta rone-
Ware3
Wilcoxon-
Mann-
Whitneyb
Quantile0
Detected
Total
Detected
Total
Site >
Background?
Site >
Background?
Site >
Background?
Site >
Background?
Site >
Background?
Radium-226
150
150
100%
36
36
100%
-
-
Yes
-
Yes
Arsenic
30
30
100%
36
36
100%
-
-
No
No
No
Chromium
30
30
100%
36
36
100%
-
-
No
No
No
Manganese
30
30
100%
36
36
100%
-
-
No
No
No
Thallium
30
30
100%
36
36
100%
-
-
No
No
No
Uranium
86
86
100%
36
36
100%
—
—
Yes
—
Yes
COC
Church Rock No. 1 East
Mine Soil
(0-6 inch bgs)
BSA-2 Soil
(0-6 inch bgs)
Two-Population Statistical Tests
Final
Conclusion
for
Background
Screen
Sample Size
Detection
Frequency
(Percent)
Sample Size
Detection
Frequency
(Percent)
Gehana
Ta rone-
Ware3
Wilcoxon-
Mann-
Whitnevb
Quantilec
Detected
Total
Detected
Total
Site >
Background?
Site >
Background?
Site >
Background?
Site >
Background?
Site >
Background?
Radium-226
67
67
100%
36
36
100%
—
—
Yes
—
Yes
Arsenic
15
15
100%
36
36
100%
—
—
No
No
No
Chromium
15
15
100%
36
36
100%
—
—
Yes
—
Yes
Manganese
15
15
100%
36
36
100%
—
—
No
No
No
Thallium
15
15
100%
36
36
100%
—
—
No
No
No
Uranium
15
15
100%
36
36
100%
-
-
Yes
-
Yes
Page 1 of 3
-------
Table 2. Comparison of Quivira Surface Soil with Bartlett Barren Member of Crevasse Canyon Formation (BSA-2) Background Surface Soil
coc
Kerr-McGee Ponds on the
Navajo Nation Soil
(0-6 inch bgs)
BSA-2 Soil
(0-6 inch bgs)
Two-Population Statistical Tests
Final
Conclusion
for
Background
Screen
Sample Size
Detection
Frequency
(Percent)
Sample Size
Detection
Frequency
(Percent)
Gehana
Ta rone-
Ware3
Wilcoxon-
Mann-
Whitnevb
Quantilec
Detected
Total
Detected
Total
Site >
Background?
Site >
Background?
Site >
Background?
Site >
Background?
Site >
Background?
Radium-226
5
5
100%
36
36
100%
-
-
Yes
-
Yes
Arsenic
5
5
100%
36
36
100%
-
-
No
No
No
Chromium
5
5
100%
36
36
100%
—
—
Yes
—
Yes
Manganese
3
3
100%
36
36
100%
-
-
No
No
No
Thallium
3
3
100%
36
36
100%
-
-
No
No
No
Uranium
5
5
100%
36
36
100%
-
-
Yes
-
Yes
COC
Kerr-McGee Ponds on
UNC Property Soil
(0-6 inch bgs)
BSA-2 Soil
(0-6 inch bgs)
Two-Population Statistical Tests
Final
Conclusion
for
Background
Screen
Sample Size
Detection
Frequency
(Percent)
Sample Size
Detection
Frequency
(Percent)
Gehana
Ta rone-
Ware3
Wilcoxon-
Mann-
Whitnevb
Quantile0
Detected
Total
Detected
Total
Site >
Background?
Site >
Background?
Site >
Background?
Site >
Background?
Site >
Background?
Radium-226
54
54
100%
36
36
100%
-
-
Yes
-
Yes
COC
Arroyos on the
Navajo Nation Soil
(0-6 inch bgs)
BSA-2 Soil
(0-6 inch bgs)
Two-Population Statistical Tests
Final
Conclusion
for
Background
Screen
Sample Size
Detection
Frequency
(Percent)
Sample Size
Detection
Frequency
(Percent)
Gehana
Ta rone-
Ware3
Wilcoxon-
Mann-
Whitnevb
Quantile0
Detected
Total
Detected
Total
Site >
Background?
Site >
Background?
Site >
Background?
Site >
Background?
Site >
Background?
Radium-226
90
90
100%
36
36
100%
—
—
No
No
No
Arsenic
3
3
100%
36
36
100%
—
—
No
No
No
Manganese
1
1
100%
36
36
100%
-
-
-
-
No
Page 2 of 3
-------
Table 2. Comparison of Quivira Surface Soil with Bartlett Barren Member of Crevasse Canyon Formation (BSA-2) Background Surface Soil
COEC
Site-Wide Soil
(0-6 inch bgs)
BSA-2 Soil
(0-6 inch bgs)
Two-Population Statistical Tests
Final
Conclusion
for
Background
Screen
Sample Size
Detection
Frequency
(Percent)
Sample Size
Detection
Frequency
(Percent)
Gehan"
Tarone-
Ware3
Wilcoxon-
Mann-
Whitnevb
Quantile0
Detected
Total
Detected
Total
Site >
Background?
Site >
Background?
Site >
Background?
Site >
Background?
Site >
Background?
Uranium-238
10
10
100%
5
36
14%
Yes
Yes
—
—
Yes
Uranium-234
10
10
100%
3
3
100%
—
—
No
Yes
Yes
Radium-226
379
379
100%
36
36
100%
—
—
Yes
—
Yes
Arsenic
108
108
100%
36
36
100%
—
—
Yes
—
Yes
Barium
108
108
100%
36
36
100%
—
—
Yes
—
Yes
Chromium
108
108
100%
36
36
100%
—
—
Yes
—
Yes
Lead
108
108
100%
36
36
100%
—
—
No
No
No
Manganese
85
85
100%
36
36
100%
—
—
No
No
No
Selenium
118
118
100%
36
36
100%
—
—
Yes
—
Yes
Thallium
84
85
99%
36
36
100%
No
No
—
No
No
Uranium
164
164
100%
36
36
100%
—
—
Yes
—
Yes
Vanadium
108
108
100%
36
36
100%
—
—
Yes
—
Yes
Zinc
85
85
100%
36
36
100%
-
-
No
No
No
Notes:
Bold indicates site soil concentrations are greater than background concentrations.
a Gehan and Tarone-Ware are tests of central tendency and only used when multiple nondetect results are present in the dataset (USEPA 2022).
b Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney is a test of central tendency and can only be used when all data are detected or a single detection limit is identified for the
nondetected results.
c Quantile is a test performed to confirm the conclusion that the upper tails of site concentrations are less than those for background. Quantile tests were not
performed in cases where the two-population tests for central tendency indicated that the site concentrations are greater than background. Quantile tests
were performed using ProUCL Version 4.1.01 (USEPA 2010b).
Not applicable
bgs Below ground surface
BSA Background study area
COC Contaminant of concern
COEC Contaminant of ecological concern
Kerr-McGee Kerr-McGee Corporation
UNC United Nuclear Corporation
USEPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
References:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2010b. "ProUCL Statistical Software for Environmental Applications for Data Sets with and without Nondetect Observation."
U^^0^d2^.^"Vro[?6&rfec^nic'aPi§SKie:n^tal:istiMr'§oftware^oPln"wonmenl^Applications for Data Sets with and without Nondetect Observations." Version 5.2.0. June 14.
Page 3 of 3
-------
Table 3. Risk Management Summary
Exposure
Unit
Land Use/
Receptor
Soil
Interval
Candidate COC or COEC
Uranium-
238
Uranium-
234
Radium-226
inSE
Arsenic
Barium
Chromium
Cobalt
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Selenium
Thallium
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
CR-1
Kee'da'whn teeh
(Full-time Navajo
Resident)
Surface
--
--
COC
< BG
--
< BG
< BG
< BG
--
< BG
--
< BG
COC
--
~
Subsurface
--
--
COC
< BG
--
< BG
< BG
< BG
~
< BG
~
< BG
COC
~
~
CR-1E
Kee'da'whn teeh
(Full-time Navajo
Resident)
Surface
--
--
COC
< BG
--
Cr(lll) not a
COPC
< BG
< BG
~
< BG
~
< BG
COC
--
--
Subsurface
--
--
COC
< BG
--
Cr(lll) not a
COPC
< BG
< BG
~
< BG
--
< BG
COC
~
~
Kerr-McGee
Ponds on the
Navajo Nation
Kee'da'whn teeh
(Full-time Navajo
Resident)
Surface
--
--
COC
< BG
--
Cr(lll) not a
COPC
< BG
< BG
--
< BG
~
< BG
COC
~
~
Subsurface
--
--
COC
< BG
--
Cr(lll) not a
COPC
< BG
< BG
~
< BG
~
< BG
COC
~
~
Kerr-McGee
Ponds on
UNC Property
UNC Outdoor
Worker
Surface
--
--
COC
--
--
--
--
--
~
--
~
--
--
~
~
Subsurface
--
--
COC
--
--
--
--
--
~
--
~
--
--
--
--
Arroyos on the
Navajo Nation
Kqq ei doo
nahaazah dah
(Difficult Access
Open Space User)
Surface
--
--
< BG
< BG
--
--
--
--
~
< BG
--
--
--
~
~
Subsurface
--
--
< BG
< BG
--
~
--
--
--
< BG
~
--
~
~
~
Arroyos on
UNC Property
UNC Outdoor
Worker
Surface
--
--
--
--
--
~
--
~
~
--
~
--
~
~
~
Subsurface
--
--
--
--
--
~
~
~
~
--
~
~
--
~
~
Site-Wide
Plants,
Invertebrates,
Birds, Mammals
Surface
--
--
EPC <
PERG
EPC <
PERG
Co-Loc
Cr(lll) not a
COPEC
~
~
< BG
< BG
EPC <
PERG
< BG
EPC <
PERG
Co-Loc
< BG
Subsurface
EPC <
PERG
EPC <
PERG
EPC <
PERG
--
Co-Loc
Cr(lll) not a
COPEC
~
~
--
< BG
EPC <
PERG
< BG
EPC <
PERG
--
--
Notes:
Bold indicates an identified final COC recommended for removal action; no COECs were recommended for removal.
Contaminant is not a candidate COC or COEC in the exposure unit and depth interval.
BG Background Cr(lll)
COC Contaminant of concern EPC
COEC Contaminant of ecological concern Kerr-McGee
Co-Loc Co-located with radium-226 preliminary removal action extent PERG
COPC Contaminant of potential concern PRG
COPEC Contaminant of potential ecological concern SE
CR-1 Quivira Church Rock No. 1 Mine UNC
CR-1E Quivira Church Rock No. 1 East Mine
Trivalent chromium
Exposure point concentration
Kerr-McGee Corporation
Preliminary ecological removal goal
Preliminary removal goal
Secular equilibrium
United Nuclear Corporation
Page 1 of 1
-------
Table 4. Quivira Mines Selection of Soil Removal Action Goal for Each COC and COEC
COCI
COEC
Units
Human
Health
PRG1
NAUM
PERG2
BTV
RAG
Basis for
RAG
Quivira Church Rock No. 1 Mine - Kee'da'whii teeh (Full-Time Navajo Resident)
Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs) and Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs)
Radium-226
pCi/g
0.050
2.0
2.0
BTV
Uranium
mg/kg
3.2
2.4
3.2
HH PRG
Quivira Church Rock No. 1 East Mine - Kee'da'whii teeh (Full-Time Navajo Resident)
Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs) and Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs)
Radium-226
pCi/g
0.050
2.0
2.0
BTV
Uranium
mg/kg
3.2
2.4
3.2
HH PRG
Kerr-McGee Ponds on the Navajo Nation - Kee'da'whii teeh (Full-Time Navajo Resident)
Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs) and Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs)
Radium-226
pCi/g
0.050
2.0
2.0
BTV
Kerr-McGee Ponds on United Nuclear Corporation Property - UNC Outdoor Worker
Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
Radium-226
pCi/g
5.4
2.0
5.4
HH PRG
Subsurface Soil (6-72 inches bgs)
Radium-226
pCi/g
5.4
2.0
5.4
HH PRG
Arroyos on the Navajo Nation - Kpp ei doo nahaazah dah (Difficult Access Open Space User)
Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs) and Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs)
No COCs or COECs Identified
Arroyos on United Nuclear Corporation Property - UNC Outdoor Worker
Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs) and Subsurface Soil (0-36 inches bgs)
No COCs or COECs Identified
Notes:
1 The human health PRG is based on the RME receptor assumed at each EU and calculated using the NAUM Risk
Calculator (USEPA 2024b).
2 No COECs were identified; no removal action is recommended to address ecological risk.
3 The BTVs for soil are UTL95-95s from the Bartlett Barren Member (Tetra Tech, Inc. 2023b).
4 The RAG is the lesser of the human health PRG and NAUM PERG, when applicable, unless either is less than the BTV.
If the BTV is greater than the human health PRG or NAUM PERG, the final RAG is to address material that is distinguishable
from background.
5 Assumption of secular equilibrium for radium-226 is protective for the calculation of risk-based screening levels.
Adjusted toxicity values are used to incorporate all toxicity for the entire uranium-238 decay chain in the
development of the PRG. Site data for radium-226 are used to evaluate the extent of radionuclides above RAGs.
-
Not a COEC
pCi/g
Picocurie per gram
bgs
Below ground surface
PERG
Preliminary ecological removal goal
BTV
Background threshold value
PRG
Preliminary removal goal
COC
Contaminant of concern
RAG
Removal action goal
COEC
Contaminant of ecological concern
RME
Reasonable maximum exposure
EU
Exposure unit
UNC
United Nuclear Corporation
HH
Human health
UTL95-95
95% upper tolerance limit with
mg/kg
Milligram per kilogram
95% coverage
NAUM
Navajo abandoned uranium mine
USEPA
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Page 1 of 2
-------
Table 4. Quivira Mines Selection of Soil Removal Action Goal for Each COC and COEC
References:
Tetra Tech, Inc. 2023b. "Quivira Mines Data Gaps Investigation Transmittal Memorandum." Response, Assessment, and
Evaluation Services. Contract No. EP-S9-17-03. September.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2024b. "Navajo Abandoned Uranium Mine Risk Calculator." Version 1.03.
March.
Page 2 of 2
-------
Table 5. General Response Actions, Technologies, and Process Options
General
Response
Actions
Response Action
Technology
Process Options
No Action
None
Not Applicable
Land Use Controls
Chapter Land Use Plans
Institutional
Homesite Lease Approval
Controls
Access Restrictions
Deed Restrictions
Environmental Control Easements
Physical Barriers
Fencing/Barrier
Surface Controls
Consolidation, Grading, Revegetation,
and Erosion Protection
Soil Binder
Segregation
Soil Sorting
Backfilling of Mine
Backfilling of Cuts, Benches, and Pits
Engineering
Controls
Workings
Backfilling of Underground Voids
Earthen Cover
Containment
Earthen Cover with Upper HDPE or
Geosynthetic Clay Liner
Regional Disposal
On-Navajo Nation Regional Repository
Off-Navajo Nation Regional Repository
Off-Navajo Nation
Disposal
Non-RCRA, Class A LLRW, or RCRA C Hazardous
Waste Disposal Facility with State License to Receive
Radioactive Material
Soil Washing
Acid Extraction
Excavation and
Treatment
Physical/Chemical
Ablation
Treatment
Milling/Reprocessing
Solidification
Stabilization
Thermal Treatment
Vitrification
Physical/Chemical
Solidification
In-Place
Treatment
Stabilization
T reatment
Thermal Treatment
Vitrification
Vegetative Treatment
Phytoextraction/Phytostabilization
Notes:
HDPE High-density polyethylene
LLRW Low-level radioactive waste
RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Page 1 of 1
-------
Table 6. Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements and To Be Considered
Requirements for Quivira Mines
Table 6a and Table 6b list the federal and Navajo Nation location- and action-specific applicable
or relevant and appropriate requirements (ARAR) and "To Be Considered" (TBC) requirements,
respectively, that have been identified for all the alternative response actions described in the
engineering evaluation/cost analysis (EE/CA) for the Quivira Tronox Mine Site (Quivira Mines).
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) did not identify chemical-specific ARARs
or TBCs because potential federal, State of New Mexico, and Navajo Nation chemical-specific
ARARs were not as conservative as the risk-based cleanup standards developed for this action.
Chemical-related requirements tied to an action such as cap design were included in the action-
specific table (Table 6b). Identification and evaluation of ARARs is an iterative process that
continues throughout the response process. As site conditions, contaminants, and response
alternatives at the Quivira Mines are better understood, the ARARs and TBCs and their
relevance to the removal action may change. ARARs and TBCs are finalized in the action
memorandum for the selected response action.
Cleanup standards were derived through the USEPA risk assessment process in accordance with
the following USEPA guidance.
• "Clarification of the Role of Applicable, or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements in
Establishing Preliminary Remediation Goals under CERCLA" (USEPA 1997a)
• "Establishment of Cleanup Levels for CERCLA [Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act] Sites with Radioactive Contamination"
(USEPA 1997b)
• "Use of Soil Cleanup Criteria in 40 CFR Part 192 as Remediation Goals for CERCLA
Sites" (USEPA 1998)
• "Radiation Risk Assessment at CERCLA Sites: Q&A" (USEPA 2014)
The following Navajo Nation laws, regulations, and guidance are not considered ARARs or
TBCs for the response actions anticipated by this EE/CA; however, they are listed here because
situations may arise during implementation of the alternatives discussed in the EE/CA or during
future actions at the Quivira Mines where these requirements may be applicable.
• Navajo Nation CERCLA. 4 Navajo Nation Code (N.N.C.) Sections (§§) 2101-2805 - The
Navajo Nation CERCLA requirements must be complied with during implementation of
the response action if petroleum contamination is discovered at the Quivira Mines
because Navajo Nation CERCLA Section (§) 2104.Q includes petroleum in the definition
of hazardous substance. Based on site investigations thus far, petroleum contamination is
not anticipated.
• Navajo Nation Underground and Aboveground Storage Tank Act of 2012 (NNSTA).
4 N.N.C. §§ 1501-1577 - If any permanent storage tanks are found at a site, including
both underground and aboveground storage tanks and tanks holding not only petroleum
but any hazardous substances, NNSTA § 1542(C) (1) requires removal of the tanks. (The
Page 1 of 13
-------
Table 6. Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements and To Be Considered
Requirements for Quivira Mines
guidance for temporary/mobile storage tanks brought on site is included in Table 6b as a
TBC because that situation is anticipated to arise.)
• Navajo Nation Business Opportunity Act. 5 N.N.C. §§ 201-214. and the Navajo
Preference in Employment Act. 15 N.N.C. §§ 601-619 - While these are not
environmental regulations and, therefore, are not ARARs, these regulations give
preference to Navajo Nation businesses and individuals when hiring employees and
contractors to perform the response actions anticipated by this EE/CA.
• Navajo Nation Dine Radioactive Materials Transportation Act (RMTA). 18 N.N.C.
§§ 1304-1307 - RMTA is not applicable to onsite activities; however, its requirements
may be applicable to transportation on public roads on the Navajo Nation between sites
that are subject to a combined action pursuant to CERCLA § 104(d)(4), as well as for
shipment of radioactive materials through the Navajo Nation generally. RMTA § 1307
includes specific requirements that are not found in federal law, including advance notice
of the transportation of radioactive and related substances, equipment, vehicles, persons,
and materials over and across the Navajo Nation, as well as license fees, bonding
requirements, route restrictions, and curfews.
The EE/CAs for which the ARARs tables below were prepared do not address groundwater and,
therefore, ARARs for groundwater are not included. If any groundwater contamination is found
at the Quivira Mines, the related ARARs will be addressed at that time.
References:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1997a. "Clarification of the Role of
Applicable, or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements in Establishing Preliminary
Remediation Goals under CERCLA." Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
(OSWER) Directive No. 9200.4-23. August.
USEPA. 1997b. "Establishment of Cleanup Levels for CERCLA Sites with Radioactive
Contamination." OSWER Directive No. 9200.4-18. August.
USEPA. 1998. "Use of Soil Cleanup Criteria in 40 CFR Part 192 as Remediation Goals for
CERCLA Sites." OSWER Directive No. 9200.4-25. February.
USEPA. 2014. "Radiation Risk Assessment at CERCLA Sites: Q&A." OSWER Directive
No. 9200.4-40. May.
Page 2 of 13
-------
Table 6a. Location-Specific ARARs and TBC Information
Media
Requirement
Requirement Synopsis
Prerequisites, Status, and
Rationale
Cultural
Resources
FEDERAL
The Native American
Graves Protection and
Repatriation Act
25 U.S.C. §§ 3002(c) and
(d)
43 CFR §§ 10.3(b)-(c) and
10.4(b)-(e)
Protects Native American cultural items from unpermitted
removal and excavation and requires the protection of such
items in the event of inadvertent discovery. Excavation or
removal of cultural items must be done under procedures
required by this act and the Archaeological Resources
Protection Act (Section 3 (c)(1)).
Applicable
Substantive requirements are
applicable if cultural items (meaning
human remains and associated or
unassociated funerary objects, sacred
objects, or cultural patrimony) are
inadvertently discovered or
intentionally excavated or removed
within the area to be disturbed.
If cultural items are discovered, on-
going activity in the area of discovery
must stop, the relevant Indian tribe
official must be notified immediately,
and reasonable effort must be made
to protect such cultural items.
Cultural
Resources
FEDERAL
National Historic
Preservation Act
54 U.S.C. §§ 306101(a),
306102, 306107, and
306108
36 CFR §§ 800.3(a) and
(c); 800.4(a)-(c); 800.5(a)-
(b); 800.6(a)-(b); 800.10(a);
800.13(b)-(d)
Federal agencies are required to consider the effects of
federally funded (in whole or in part) activity on any historic
property or objects and minimize harm to any National
Historic Landmark. Federal agencies may be required to
identify historic properties or objects, determine whether
proposed activity will have an adverse effect on historic
properties or objects, and develop alternatives or
modifications to the proposed action that could avoid,
minimize, or mitigate adverse effects through the National
Historic Preservation Act's Section 106 process.
Applicable
Substantive requirements are
applicable if a federally funded activity
could adversely affect historic
property (meaning a prehistoric or
historic district, site, building,
structure, or object) included on, or
eligible for inclusion on, the National
Register of Historic Places.
Cultural
Resources
FEDERAL
Preservation of Historical
and Archaeological Data
54 U.S.C. §§ 312502(a)
and 312503
Protects significant scientific, prehistorical, historical, and
archaeological data. When a federal agency action may
cause irreparable loss or destruction of significant data, the
agency must notify DO I and either recover, protect, and
preserve the data itself or request DOI to do so.
Applicable
Substantive requirements are
applicable if a federal agency action
may cause irreparable loss or
destruction to significant scientific,
prehistorical, historical, or
archaeological data.
Page 3 of 13
-------
Table 6a. Location-Specific ARARs and TBC Information
Media
Requirement
Requirement Synopsis
Prerequisites, Status, and
Rationale
Cultural
Resources
FEDERAL
Archaeological
Resources Protection Act
of 1979
16 U.S.C. §§ 470cc(a)-(c)
and 470ee(a)
43 CFR §§ 7.4(a), 7.5(a),
7.7, 7.8(a), 7.9(c), and 7.35
Prohibits the excavation, removal, damage, or alteration or
defacement of archaeological resources on public or Indian
lands unless by permit or exception.
Applicable
Substantive requirements are
applicable if eligible archaeological
resources are within the area to be
disturbed.
Cultural
Resources
FEDERAL
American Indian
Religious Freedom Act
42 U.S.C. § 1996
Policy of the United States to protect access to and the use
of religious, ceremonial, and burial sites and sacred objects
by Native American groups.
TBC
Policy should be followed if Native
American sacred sites are identified
within the area to be disturbed.
Biological
Resources
FEDERAL
Migratory Bird Treaty Act
16 U.S.C. § 703(a)
50 CFR §§ 10.13 and 21.10
Prohibits the killing, capturing, taking, and incidental taking of
protected migratory bird species, their parts, nests, and eggs
without DOI's prior approval. Protected migratory birds
species are listed at 50 CFR § 10.13.
Applicable
Substantive requirements are
applicable if migratory birds or their
nests are present at or near the site.
Biological
Resources
FEDERAL
Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act
16 U.S.C. §§ 668(a)
50 CFR §§ 22.10; 22.80(a),
(c)-(f); 22.85(a)-(b) and (d)-
(e)
50 CFR § 13.21(b)
Prohibits the unpermitted taking, including the killing,
disturbing, or incidental taking, of bald and golden eagles,
their parts, nests, and eggs.
Applicable
Substantive requirements are
applicable if bald or golden eagles or
their nests are identified at or near the
site.
Page 4 of 13
-------
Table 6a. Location-Specific ARARs and TBC Information
Media
Requirement
Requirement Synopsis
Prerequisites, Status, and
Rationale
Biological
Resources
FEDERAL
Endangered Species Act
16 U.S.C. §§ 1531(c);
1536(a)(2), (c)-(d), (g)-(h),
and (I); 1538(a) and (g);
1539(a)
50 CFR §§ 17.21(a)-
(c);17.22(b); 17.31(a) and
(c);17.32(b); 17.82; and
17.94(a)
50 CFR §§ 402.09; 402.12
(a)-(b) and (i); 402.14(a);
402.15(a)
Federal agencies must ensure that any activities funded,
carried out, or authorized by them do not jeopardize the
continued existence of any threatened or endangered
species or result in the destruction or alteration of such
species' habitats. Endangered and threatened species are
listed at 50 CFR Part 17, Subpart B.
Applicable
Substantive requirements are
applicable if endangered or
threatened species are identified at
the site.
Cultural
Resources
NAVAJO NATION
Navajo Nation Cultural
Resources Protection Act
11 N.N.C. §§ 1003(S);
1021; and 1031
Prohibits alteration, damage, excavation, defacement,
destruction, or removal of cultural properties.
Applicable
Substantive requirements are
applicable to activities at the AUM
sites where cultural resources may be
encountered.
Cultural
NAVAJO NATION
Navajo Nation Policy for
the Disposition of
Cultural Resources
Collections
Sections 2 and 6.1
(These sections would
trigger other provisions in
the policy)
Establishes procedures and guidelines to be followed for
excavation (as a last resort) and disposition of cultural
resources recovered on the Navajo Nation, including the
handling of inadvertent discovery.
TBC
TBC for activities on AUM sites where
cultural resources may be
encountered.
Resources
Page 5 of 13
-------
Table 6a. Location-Specific ARARs and TBC Information
Media
Requirement
Requirement Synopsis
Prerequisites, Status, and
Rationale
Cultural
Resources
NAVAJO NATION
Navajo Nation Guidelines
for the Treatment of
Discovery Situations
Establish procedures and guidelines to be followed in any
situation involving the discovery of cultural or historic
property, including historical and prehistoric archaeological
sites and traditional cultural properties and human remains
whether or not previously identified.
TBC
NNFIFIPD performs these functions
pursuant to a contract with BIA under
which NNFIFIPD serves as the BIA's
agent.
Cultural
Resources
NAVAJO NATION
Navajo Nation Policy for
the Protection of
Jishchaa: Gravesites,
Human Remains, and
Funerary Items
Establishes principles for locating and handling of gravesites,
human remains, and associated artifacts and soil in the area
to be disturbed by AUM removal activities. See in particular
Section IV (Traditional Concerns), which contains
requirements if the AUM activity comes into contact with
gravesites, human remains, or funerary items. It imposes
specific requirements for how to navigate around, prepare
for, and respond to burial grounds and uncovered remains.
See also Section V (Encountering Gravesites, Human
Remains, and Funerary Items), which specifies the
procedures when an inadvertent discovery is made. Sections
VI and VII contain additional requirements in that event.
TBC
Biological
Resources
NAVAJO NATION
Navajo Nation
Endangered Species Act
17 N.N.C. §§ 500-508
Navajo Nation
Endangered Species List
- Resource Committee
Resolution RCAU-103-05
NNESA § 507 makes it unlawful for any person to "take,
possess, transport, export, process, sell or offer for sale or
ship any species or subspecies of wildlife" listed as
endangered or threatened on federal or Navajo Nation lists,
which also protect those species' critical habitat. NNESA §§
500-504 and 506-508 also protect, to various extents, game
fish, game birds, songbirds, game animals, fur-bearing
animals (all defined under § 500), and hawks, vultures, and
owls from being taken.
The Navajo Nation Endangered Species List includes
species that are not on the federal list. It also provides
broader criteria for when species would be listed based on
their prospects of survival or recruitment within the Navajo
Nation (see categories "G2" and "G3"). Category G4 provides
a means for the Navajo Nation Department of Fish and
Wildlife to include additional species (or exclude species),
making it possible for the list to change during the course of
work.
Applicable
Substantive requirements applicable
if protected species or habitat are
identified within the area to be
disturbed on AUM sites.
Page 6 of 13
-------
Table 6a. Location-Specific ARARs and TBC Information
Notes:
§ Section
§§ Sections
ARAR Applicable or relevant and appropriate requirement
AUM Abandoned uranium mine
BIA Bureau of Indian Affairs
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DOI U.S. Department of the Interior
N. N. C. Navajo Nation Code
NNESA Navajo Nation Endangered Species Act
NNHHPD Navajo Nation Heritage and Historic Preservation Department
TBC To be considered
U.S.C. United States Code
Page 7 of 13
-------
Table 6b. Action-Specific ARARs and TBC Information
Media
Requirement
Requirement Synopsis
Prerequisites, Status, and
Rationale
Air
FEDERAL
Clean Air Act
42 U.S.C. §§ 7401, ef seq.
40 CFR § 61.92
Emissions of radionuclides to the ambient air from DOE
facilities shall not exceed those amounts that would
cause any member of the public to receive in any year an
effective dose equivalent of 10 millirems per year.
Relevant and Appropriate
This standard is applicable to a DOE
facility. The site is not a DOE facility;
therefore, this standard is not applicable.
Flowever, this standard has been
determined to be relevant and appropriate
during removal action activities because
of potential emissions of radionuclides
during excavation of the waste and
movement of the waste.
Air
FEDERAL
Clean Air Act
42 U.S.C. §§ 7401, ef seq.
40 CFR §§ 61.222(a)
Radon-222 emissions to the ambient air from a uranium
mill tailings pile that is no longer operational shall not
exceed 20 picocuries per square meter per second.
Relevant and Appropriate
These requirements are applicable to
nonoperational uranium mill tailings piles.
The site's waste to be disposed of is not
uranium mill tailings. These requirements
have been determined to be relevant and
appropriate to the design of the
engineered cover to be constructed in
Alternative 2, which consists of onsite
containment of the contaminated soil and
uranium waste rock.
Water
FEDERAL
Clean Water Act
33 U.S.C. § 1342(p)(3)(A)
NPDES - Stormwater
Discharges
40 CFR §§ 450.21
Requires BMPs to abate discharges of pollutants from
stormwater discharges, including erosion and sediment
control BMPs. All treatment and control systems and
facilities will be properly operated and maintained.
Applicable
If there are discharges to WOTUS.
Relevant and Appropriate
If there are discharges to Navajo Nation
surface waters (as defined in Table 206.1
of Navajo Nation Surface Water Quality
Standards 2015).
Page 8 of 13
-------
Table 6b. Action-Specific ARARs and TBC Information
Media
Requirement
Requirement Synopsis
Prerequisites, Status, and
Rationale
Water
FEDERAL
Clean Water Act
33 U.S.C. § 1342(p)
NPDES 2022 Construction
General Permit for
Stormwater Discharges
from Construction
Activities
Part 2. Technology-Based
Effluent Limitations.
Section 2.2. Erosion and
Sediment Control
Requirements,
Subsection 2.2.1.
Requires implementation of erosion and sediment
controls to minimize the discharge of pollutants in
stormwater from construction activities. Natural buffers or
equivalent erosion and sediment controls must be
provided and maintained for discharges to receiving
waters within 50 feet of the site's earth disturbances.
For any discharges to receiving waters within 50 feet of
the site's earth disturbances, one of the following
alternatives must be complied with:
i. Provide and maintain a 50-foot undisturbed natural
buffer
ii. Provide and maintain an undisturbed natural buffer that
is less than 50 feet and is supplemented by erosion and
sediment controls that achieve, in combination, the
sediment load reduction equivalent to a 50-foot
undisturbed natural buffer
iii. If infeasible to provide and maintain an undisturbed
natural buffer of any size, implement erosion and
sediment controls to achieve the sediment load reduction
equivalent to a 50-foot undisturbed natural buffer.
Applicable
For operators of construction activities if
weather events necessitating stormwater
runoff controls occur during onsite
excavation, waste consolidation, and
repository construction.
Water
FEDERAL
Clean Water Act
33 U.S.C. § 1344
CWA § 404(b) Guidelines
40 CFR §§ 230.10;
230.61, and 230.71-76
Prohibits the unpermitted discharge of dredge or fill
material into WOTUS other than incidental fallback.
Should dredge and fill material be discharged to a
WOTUS, the chemical, biological, and physical impacts
to the WOTUS must be tested and evaluated. Any
adverse effects shall be minimized by treating the
material before discharge, limiting the mobility of the
discharge materials and avoiding or limiting impacts to
WOTUS that serve as wildlife habitat, recreational space,
or other use by humans.
Applicable
If there are discharges to WOTUS.
Relevant and Appropriate
If there are discharges to Navajo Nation
surface waters (as defined in NNCWA
§ 1302(43) and listed in Table 206.1 of
Navajo Nation Surface Water Quality
Standards 2015).
Page 9 of 13
-------
Table 6b. Action-Specific ARARs and TBC Information
Media
Requirement
Requirement Synopsis
Prerequisites, Status, and
Rationale
Water
FEDERAL
Clean Water Act
33 U.S.C. § 1344
CWA § 404
Nationwide Permit 38 -
Clean Up of Hazardous
and Toxic Waste
Onsite CERCLA actions conducted by a federal agency
that involve the discharge of dredged or fill material into
WOTUS must comply with the substantive requirements
of the Nationwide Permit 38 general conditions, as
appropriate, and any regional or case-specific conditions
recommended by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
district engineer after consultation.
Applicable
If there are discharges to WOTUS.
Relevant and Appropriate
If there are discharges to Navajo Nation
surface waters (as defined in NNCWA
§ 1302(43) and listed in Table 206.1 of
Navajo Nation Surface Water Quality
Standards 2015).
Repository
FEDERAL
Uranium Mill Tailings
Radiation Control Act
42 U.S.C. §§ 7918 and
2022
40 CFR§§192.02(a) and
(d)
Requires design of uranium mill tailings disposal sites to
provide for control of residual radioactive materials for up
to 1,000 years to the extent reasonably achievable and,
in any case, for at least 200 years. The uranium mill
tailings disposal site must also be designed and
stabilized in a manner that minimizes the need for future
maintenance.
Relevant and Appropriate
These standards are applicable to
UMTRCA Title I sites. The site is not a
Title I site; therefore, these requirements
are not applicable. These requirements
have been determined to be relevant and
appropriate to the design of the
engineered cover to be constructed under
Alternative 2, which consists of onsite
containment of the contaminated soil and
uranium waste rock.
Page 10 of 13
-------
Table 6b. Action-Specific ARARs and TBC Information
Media
Requirement
Requirement Synopsis
Prerequisites, Status, and
Rationale
Repository
FEDERAL
Uranium Mill Tailings
Radiation Control Act
42 U.S.C. §§ 7918 and
2022
10 CFR Part 40,
Appendix A. Criterions 1,
4, 6(1), 6(3), 6(5) and 6(7)
In selecting and designing uranium mill tailings disposal
sites, certain criteria must be considered, including
remoteness, hydrologic and topographic features,
potential for erosion, and vegetation. Disposal sites must
be covered by an earthen cap, or approved alterative,
that meets certain control requirements, including limiting
the release of radon-222 to the atmosphere. When the
final radon barrier is placed in phases, verification of the
radon-222 release rate must be completed for each
portion of the final radon barrier as it is emplaced. Waste
or rock with elevated levels of radium must not be placed
near the surface of disposal sites. Disposal sites must be
closed in a manner that, to the extent necessary,
controls, minimizes, or eliminates post-closure escape of
non-radiological hazardous constituents, leachate,
contaminated rainwater, or waste decomposition
products to the ground or surface waters or atmosphere.
Relevant and Appropriate
These standards are applicable to
UMTRCA Title I sites. The site is not a
Title I site; therefore, these requirements
are not applicable. These requirements
have been determined to be relevant and
appropriate to the design of the
engineered cover to be constructed in
Alternative 2, which consists of onsite
containment for the contaminated soil and
uranium waste rock.
Repository
FEDERAL
NRC Regulations
Protection of the
General Population from
Releases of
Radioactivity
10 CFR §61.41
Concentrations of radioactive material that may be
released to the general environment in groundwater,
surface water, air, soil, plants, or animals must not result
in an annual dose exceeding an equivalent of 25
millirems to the whole body, 75 millirems to the thyroid,
and 25 millirems to any other organ of any member of the
public. Reasonable effort should be made to maintain
releases of radioactivity in effluents to the general
environment as low as is reasonably achievable.
Relevant and Appropriate
This standard is applicable to NRC sites.
The site is not an NRC site; therefore, this
requirement is not applicable. This
standard was found to be relevant and
appropriate to the design of the
engineered cover to be constructed in
Alternative 2, which consists of onsite
containment of contaminated soil and
uranium waste rock.
All
NEW MEXICO
NMAC§ 20.3.13.1317
Requires the protection of the general population from the
release of radioactivity.
Relevant and Appropriate
This regulation is the same as 40 CFR
§ 192. This requirement is not applicable
to the site but is relevant and appropriate.
Page 11 of 13
-------
Table 6b. Action-Specific ARARs and TBC Information
Media
Requirement
Requirement Synopsis
Prerequisites, Status, and
Rationale
All
NEW MEXICO
NMAC § 20.3.4
Establishes standards for protection against radiation.
Relevant and Appropriate
This regulation is the same as 10 CFR
§ 20. This requirement is not applicable to
the site but is relevant and appropriate.
Soil
NEW MEXICO
NMAC §§ 19.10.5.507 and
19.10.5.508
Establishes performance and reclamation standards and
requirements for noncoal mining operations.
Relevant and Appropriate
This regulation provides revegetation
requirements for existing noncoal mining
operations, as well as other reclamation
requirements.
Soil and
Water
NEW MEXICO
New Mexico Soil and
Water Conservation
District Act
New Mexico Statutes
Annotated 73-20-25
Establishes state authority to control and prevent soil
erosion, prevent floodwater and sediment damage to soil,
and conserve natural resources.
TBC
This regulation will be a TBC to the extent
that it does not conflict with CERCLA, the
National Contingency Plan, 40 CFR Part
300, or other federal requirements.
Soil
NEW MEXICO
Joint Guidance for the
Cleanup and
Reclamation of Existing
Uranium Mining
Operations in New
Mexico (March 2016)
This guidance is used to assist mine site responsible
parties in addressing soil radiation at existing uranium
mines as part of reclamation activities.
TBC
This guidance will be a TBC to the extent
that it does not conflict with CERCLA, the
National Contingency Plan, 40 CFR Part
300, or other federal requirements.
Soil
NEW MEXICO
Guidance for Soil
Suitability, Revegetation
and Self-Sustaining
Ecosystem (1996)
Used to implement and evaluate vegetation success and
soil cover material properties and reclamation.
TBC
This guidance will be a TBC for restoration
of excavated or covered waste.
Page 12 of 13
-------
Table 6b. Action-Specific ARARs and TBC Information
Media
Requirement
Requirement Synopsis
Prerequisites, Status, and
Rationale
All
NAVAJO NATION
Navajo Nation
Fundamental Law 1
N.N.C. §§ 201-206
Navajo Nation Guidance
on the Uniform Application
of Fundamental Law to
AUM Cleanup Activities
(2022)
The Navajo people have an obligation under the Navajo
Nation Fundamental Law to listen to elders and medicine
people and respect, preserve, and protect Mother Earth
as stewards and guardians for the benefit of future
generations.
The 2020 guidance explains the principles of the Navajo
Nation Fundamental Law and how the principles would
be applied at the various stages of AUM cleanup.
TBC
Navajo Nation Fundamental Law and the
2022 guidance will be TBCs to the extent
that they do not conflict with CERCLA, the
National Contingency Plan, 40 CFR Part
300, or other federal requirements.
Soil and
Water
NAVAJO NATION
Navajo Nation
Underground and
Aboveground Storage
Tank Act of 2012 -
4 N.N.C. §§ 1501-1577, as
amended
NNEPA Storage Tank
Program Guidance No. 3
(ASTs at Construction
Sites) - Section III
(Operating Guidelines)
Regulates storage of petroleum and other regulated
substances in underground tanks and ASTs. This
guidance clarifies that the NNSTA applies to ASTs that
are temporarily placed at construction sites within the
Navajo Nation. It requires such ASTs to file tank
information forms with NNEPA, locate the tank within a
secondary containment area, secure the tank to prevent
movement on the containment surface or mount it on
metal skids (not on an elevated stilt rack), and contact
the Navajo Nation Storage Tank Program for an
inspection of the AST to check for evidence of soil
contamination both before the first deposit of a regulated
substance and when the AST is removed from the site.
TBC
Guidance should be followed for AUM
response activities requiring ASTs to be
brought to sites (for example, for fuel
needed for equipment and vehicles).
Notes:
§ Section
§§ Sections
ARAR Applicable or relevant and appropriate requirement
AST Aboveground storage tank
AUM Abandoned uranium mine
BMP Best management practice
CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CWA Clean Water Act
DOE U.S. Department of Energy
NMAC New Mexico Administrative Code
N. N. C. Navajo Nation Code
NNCWA Navajo Nation Clean Water Act
NNEPA Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency
NNSTA Navajo Nation Underground and Aboveground Storage Tank Act
NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
NRC U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
TBC To be considered
UMTRCA Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act
U.S.C. United States Code
WOTUS Waters of the U.S.
Page 13 of 13
-------
APPENDIX A
QUIVIRA MINES SITE IMAGES
-------
"It
Appendix A: Quivira Mines Site images
Location:
CR-1, facing
south.
Description:
Red Water Pond
Road Bridge at
Unnamed
Arroyo,
Photograph 2
Date: 5/16/22
Location:
CR-1, facing
north.
Description:
View of CR-1
main gate at
Red Water Pond
Road.
The following photos were taken during visits to the Quivira Church Rock 1 Mine (CR-1),
Church Rock 1 East Mine (CR 110, and Kerr-McGee Corporation (Kerr-McGee) Ponds in
January 2020 and April, May, and June 2022.
Photograph 1
Date: 5/16/22
Contract No. 68HE0923D0G02, Task Order 001
A-l
-------
"It
Appendix A: Quivira Mines Site images
Photograph 3
Date: 4/12/22
Location:
CR-1 at Red
Water Pond
Road, facing
northwest.
Description:
Culvert draining
CR-1 access
road.
Photograph 4
Date: 4/12/22
• rffri: i- -
Location:
CR-1, facing
south.
Description:
Overview of the
main waste rock
pile, Red Water
Pond Road,
Unnamed
Arroyo, and
access to site.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0G02, Task Order 001
A-2
-------
Appendix A: Quivira Mines Site Images l__.
Photograph 5
Date: 4/12/22
Location:
CR-1, facing
southeast.
Description:
Overview of the
top of the main
waste rock pile
and smaller
waste pile from
the time-critical
removal action
area.
Photograph 6
Date: 4/12/22
Location:
CR-1, facing
east.
Description:
Overview of the
top of the main
waste rock pile
and industrial
area.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0G02, Task Order 001
A-3
-------
"It
Appendix A: Quivira Mines Site images
03$. -r. :.rT ',-r '
jyS^ps^^f *
Photograph 7
Date: 4/12/22
Location:
CR-1, facing
east.
Description:
Close-up view
of the industrial
area behind the
waste pile.
Photograph 8
Date: 1/24/20
Location:
CR-1, facing
southwest.
Description:
View of the top
of the waste pile
and adjacent
community.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0G02, Task Order 001
A-4
-------
Appendix A: Quivira Mines Site images
It
Photograph 9
Date: 1/24/20
Location:
CR 1, facing
east.
Description:
View across the
top of the waste
pile with the
lower ponds
area at upper
right.
Photograph 10
Date: 1/24/20
Location:
CR 1, facing
north.
Description:
View of the top
of the waste pile
with the
industrial area
beyond.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0G02, Task Order 001
A-5
-------
"It
Appendix A: Quivira Mines Site images
Photograph 12
Date: 4/12/22
Location:
CR-1, facing
west.
Description:
Toe of the south
side of CR 1
waste rock pile.
Photograph 11
Date: 4/12/22
Location:
CR-1, facing
east.
Description:
Toe of the south
side of CR-l
waste rock pile.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0G02, Task Order 001
A-6
-------
"It
Appendix A: Quivira Mines Site images
Photograph 13
Date: 1/24/20
Location:
CR-1, facing
northeast.
Description:
Rills and
erosion on the
main waste pile.
Photograph 14
Date: 5/09/22
Location:
CR-1, facing
east.
Description:
Ponds access
road filled with
vegetation.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0G02, Task Order 001
A-7
-------
"It
Appendix A: Quivira Mines Site images
Photograph 15
Date: 6/01/22
Location:
CR 1. facing
east.
Description:
Ponds access
road after being
cleared and
graded.
Photograph 16
Date: 5/10/22
Location:
CR-1, facing
east.
Description:
Overlooking the
upper ponds
area.
East Elevation
0 270°W (T) • 35.666289, -108.500278 +5 m A 2139 m
099°E(T)*35.666241,-108.500406±5m A 2119m
Win
Contract No. 68HE0923D0G02, Task Order 001
A-8
-------
"It
Appendix A: Quivira Mines Site images
E
si:
S
H
60
1 • 1 • 1
90
120
i • i
ISO
. 1 . 1 .
its
, J . | . | ,
210
, | . | .
±J
0136'SE(T)» 35.666286, -108.499795 ±3 m a 2113 m
Photograph 17
Date: 5/9/22
Location:
CR 1. facing
southeast.
Description:
Overlooking the
upper ponds
area.
Photograph 18
Date: 5/09/22
Location:
CR 1. facing
south.
Description:
Overlooking the
lower ponds
area.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0G02, Task Order 001
A-9
-------
Appendix A: Quivira Mines Site images
It
Photograph 19
Date: 5/09/22
W
270
NW
NE
Location:
CR-1, facing
north.
Description:
Overview of the
lower ponds
area with an
outcrop and
waste pile in the
upper left.
:V*v;
l * t-s a &&&%
-i'
9l3v£*
p9
Photograph 20
Date: 1/24/20
Location:
CR-1, facing
west.
Description:
Facing the main
waste pile from
the ponds area.
0 355'N (T)« 35.663857, -108.499577 +3 m i 2109 m
Contract No. 68HE0923D0G02, Task Order 001
A-10
-------
Appendix A: Quivira Mines Site images
It
Z'-'T "
mf-^7W?f r*:
t£9H|
Photograph 21
Date: 1/24/20
Location:
CR-1 lower
pond area,
facing west.
Description:
Overview of the
lower pond area
and proximity
of residences.
Photograph 22
Date: 1/24/20
Location:
CR-1 Unnamed
Arroyo adjacent
to lower pond
area, facing
northwest.
Description:
Overview of the
waste pile in
background,
pond area in
middle, and
arroyo in
foreground.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0G02, Task Order 001
A-ll
-------
"It
Appendix A: Quivira Mines Site images
Photograph 23
Date: 1/24/20
Location:
CR-1 lower
pond area,
facing north.
Description:
Erosion and
runoff from the
lower pond area.
O 60"NE (T) » 35.662264, -108.50222 +14 m A. 2081 m
mm
Photograph 24
Date: 4/13/22
Location:
Unnamed
Arroyo adjacent
to CR-1 lower
pond area,
facing east.
Description:
Erosion and
runoff from the
lower pond area
entering the
arroyo.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0G02, Task Order 001
A-12
-------
"It
Appendix A: Quivira Mines Site images
Photograph 25
Date: 4/13/22
Location:
CR-1 northeast
of the waste pile
and pond area,
facing
southwest.
Description:
Gap in the site
fence. Note the
juniper trees
growing in the
undisturbed area
of the site.
Photograph 26
Date: 1/24/20
Location:
CR-1E, facing
west.
Description:
Western end of
CR-1E along
the utility
pipeline
alignment.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0G02, Task Order 001
A-13
-------
Appendix A: Quivira Mines Site images
It
Photograph 27
Date: 1/24/20
Location:
CR-1E, facing
south.
Description:
Western end of
CR-1E looking
across the road
toward the
Pipeline Canyon
Arroyo.
Photograph 28
Date: 1/24/20
Location:
CR-1E, facing
east.
Description:
Eastern end of
CR-lEthe site.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0G02, Task Order 001
A-14
-------
"It
Appendix A: Quivira Mines Site images
Photograph 29
Date: 1/24/20
Location:
CR-1E, facing
southeast.
Description:
View from the
northern edge of
site near the adit
with waste rock
to middle left.
Photograph 30
Date: 1/24/20
Location:
CR-1E, facing
northeast.
Description:
Overview of
eastern end of
CR-1E site.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0G02, Task Order 001 A-15
-------
"It
Appendix A: Quivira Mines Site images
Photograph 31
Date: 4/12/22
Location:
Pipeline Canyon
Arroyo adjacent
to CR- IE.
Description:
Pipe from CR-
1E discharging
to arroyo.
Heavy erosion
is visible below
the culvert
leading into the
arroyo.
Photograph 32
Date: 4/12/22
Location:
Pipeline Canyon
Arroyo, facing
east.
Description:
Debris inside of
the arroyo
adjacent to CR-
1E,
Contract No. 68HE0923D0G02, Task Order 001
A-16
-------
"It
Appendix A: Quivira Mines Site images
Photograph 33
Date: 4/12/22
Location:
CR-1E Pipeline
Canyon Arroyo,
facing
southeast.
Description:
The arroyo
adjacent to CR-
1E.
Photograph 34
Date: 4/12/22
Location:
Kerr-McGee
Ponds, facing
northeast.
Description:
Properly
boundary and
access road
along the
northern edge of
Kerr-McGee
Ponds area.
0 54'NE(T)t 35.659663,-108.491071 +13 m a 2126 m
Contract No. 68HE0923D0G02, Task Order 001
A-17
-------
Appendix A: Quivira Mines Site images
It
Photograph 35
Date: 4/11/22
Location:
Kerr-McGee
Ponds, facing
southeast.
Description:
Cattle on Kerr-
McGee Ponds
area.
Photograph 36
Date: 7/18/17
Location:
Kerr-McGee
Ponds, facing
down.
Description:
Location of
surface sample
KMP-23. Note
the typical brush
cover of the site.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0G02, Task Order 001
A-18
-------
"It
Appendix A: Quivira Mines Site images
Photograph 37
Date: 7/18/17
Location:
Kerr-McGee
Ponds, facing
south.
Description:
Location of a
subsurface
sample. Note the
heavy brush
cover in this
area of the site.
Photograph 38
Date: 7/18/17
Location:
Arroyo
upstream of
Kerr-McGee
Ponds, facing
northeast.
Description:
Collecting
surface soil
sample KMP-12
in unnamed
arroyo north of
the United
Nuclear
Corporation
property line.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0G02, Task Order 001
A-19
-------
"It
Appendix A: Quivira Mines Site images
Photograph 39
Date: 7/18/17
Location:
Arroyo
upstream of
Kerr-McGee
Ponds, facing
southwest.
Description:
Collecting
sample KMP-11
in unnamed
arroyo north of
the United
Nuclear
Corporation
property line.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0G02, Task Order 001
A-20
-------
APPENDIX B
CONTAMINANT DISTRIBUTION
-------
, / '¦-
~ V\
SN
-
Notes:
1The estimated radium-226 interpolated surface was generated
using gamma survey data from Quivira Mines. Gamma survey
results were converted from counts per minute to estimated
radium-226 concentrations ira^pCi/g using a linear site-specific
gamma-radium model (Model #2).
2BTV is based on the 95 percent upper tolerance limit with 95
percent coverage of the background dataset. The BTV is the RAG
for a I exposure units on the Navajo Nation.
3Results for soil samples are presented using the same color
scheme as the interpolated results.
Abbreviations:
BTV
CR-1
CR-1E
HH
KMP
NN
pCi/g
PERG
PRG
RAG
TENORM
UNC
Background threshold value
Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1
Mine Site
Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1
East Mine Site
Human health
Kerr-McGee Pond
Navajo Nation
Picocurie per gram
Preliminary ecological removal goal
Preliminary removal goal
Removal action goal
Technologica ly enhanced natura ly
occuring radioactive material
United nuclear corporation
ESTIMATED RADIUM-226 AND RADIUM-226
RESULTS WITHIN THE
TENORM BOUNDARY
Prepared For: U.S. EPA Region 9
Prepared By:
TETRATECH
Estimated Radium-226 (pCi/g)1
~ s 0.050 s HH PRG (Resident)
1 inch = 600 feet
1:7,200
600 300 0
Task Order No.:
Contract No.:
68HE0923D0002
QUIVIRA MINES
3/4/2024
Coordinate System:
NAD 1983 State Plane New Mexico West
FIPS 3003 Feet Transverse Mercator
Figure No.:
Arroyo on
' theNN
f I 0.050 -2.0
| I 2.0-5.4
I I 5.4-40
I | >40
Soil Sample Locations3
~ Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
j TENORM
Radium-226 Removal Action Extent
KXXl Removal Action Extent
Exposure Units
{ 1 CR-1
5 ICR-1E
1 1 KMP on the NN
8 I KMP on the UNC
J ] Arroyo on the NN
I ] Arroyo on the UNC
Site-wide (Ecological Risk)
HH PRG (Resident) -
RAG (BTV)2
RAG (BTV) - RAG (HH
PRG UNC Worker)
RAG (HH PRG UNC
Worker) - PERG
> PERG
-------
Site Features
~ Waste Rock Area
Former Stockpile Area
Abbreviations:
BTV
Background threshold value
CR-1
Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1
Mine Site
CR-1E
Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1
East Mine Site
COC
Contaminant of Concern
DAOS
Difficult access open space
HH
Human health
KMP
Kerr-McGee Pond
mg/kg
Mi ligram per kilogram
NN
Navajo Nation
PERG
Preliminary ecological removal goal
PRG
Preliminary removal goal
TENORM
Technologica ly enhanced natura ly
occuring radioactive material
UNC
United nuclear corporation
Notes:
1The arsenic interpolated surface was generated using surface soil
sample results from Quivira Mine in nonlinear areas with sufficient
data available for interpolation.
2BTV is based on the 95 percent upper tolerance limit with 95
percent coverage of the background dataset.
3Arsenic was not identified as a candidate COC for the UNC
Worker exposure scenario. Arsenic site concentrations exceed
background concentrations site-wide, but are less than background
in all HH ELJs, and was not identified as a COC. PRGs are
provided for context because arsenic was identified as a candidate
COC on UNC Property.
"Results for soil samples are presented using the same color
scheme as the interpolated results.
KMP on
e'UNCJ
Arroyo on
the UNC
Interpolated Arsenic (mg/kg)1
HH PRG (Resident)2
I I £ 2.5
I I 2.5-7.5
I I 7.5-8.9
I I 8.9-68
UD 68-750 PERG-HH PRG (UNC Worker)3
HH PRG (Resident) -
HH PRG (DAOS)
HH PRG (DAOS) - BTV2
BTV-PERG
Soil Sample Locations4
~ Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
Radium-226 Removal Action Extent
|>5<5l Removal Action Extent
L" jTENORM
Exposure Units
~ CR-1
II ICR-1E
i \ KMP on the NN
[ 1 KMP on the UNC
II I Arroyo on the NN
|__| Arroyo on the UNC
Site-wide (Ecological Risk)
1 inch = 600 feet
1:7,200
600 300 0
N
W-^|"--E
S
600
I Feet
ARSENIC RESULTS
WITHIN THE
TENORM BOUNDARY
Prepared For: U.S. EPA Region 9
Prepared By:
TETRATECH
Task Order No.:
0001
QUIVIRA MINES
Contract No.:
68H E092 3 D0002
3/6/2024
Coordinate System:
NAD 1983 State Plane New Mexico West
FIPS 3003 Feet Transverse Mercator
Figure No.:
B-2
-------
Abbreviations:
BTV
Background threshold value
CR-1
Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1
Mine Site
CR-1E
Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1
East Mine Site
DAOS
Difficult access open space
HH
Human health
KMP
Kerr-McGee Pond
mg/kg
Milligram per kilogram
NN
Navajo Nation
PERG
Preliminary ecological removal goal
TENORM
Technologically enhanced naturally
occuring radioactive material
UNC
United nuclear corporation
Notes:
^The barium interpolated surface was generated using surface soil
sample results from Quivira Mine in non-linear areas with su ficient
data available for interpolation.
ZBTV is based on the 95 percent upper tolerance limit with 95
percent coverage of the background dataset.
3Results for soil samples are presented using the same color
scheme as the interpolated results.
Interpolated Barium (mg/kg)1
I I < 111
I I 111 - 1,400
I I 1,400 -2,800
< BTV
BTV-PERG
PERG - 2 x PERG
>2x PERG
I I >2,800
Soil Sample Locations3
~ Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
[v.V:::--l Radium-226 Removal Action Extent
Removal Action Extent
(_ J TENORM
Exposure Units
I 1 CR-1
n CR-1E
I I I KMP on the NN
I Ti KMP on the UNC
II I Arroyo on the NN
Arroyo on the UNC
Site-wide (Ecological Risk)
1 inch = 600 feet
1:7,200
600 300 0
BARIUM RESULTS
WITHIN THE
TENORM BOUNDARY
Prepared For: U.S. EPA Region 9
Prepared By:
TETRATECH
Task Order No.:
Contract No.:
68H E 09 2 3 D0002
QUIVIRA MINES
3/6/2024
Coordinate System:
NAD 1983 State Plane New Mexico West
FIPS 3003 Feet Transverse Mercator
Figure No.:
Site Features
Waste Rock Area
Former Stockpile Area
-------
Site Features
~ Waste Rock Area
Former Stockpile Area
Abbreviations:
BTV
Background threshold value
CR-1
Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1
Mine Site
CR-1E
Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1
East Mine Site
DAOS
Di ficult access open space
HH
Human health
KMP
Kerr-McGee Pond
mg/kg
Mi ligram per kilogram
NN
Navajo Nation
PERG
Preliminary ecological removal goal
TENORM
Technologica ly enhanced natura ly
occuring radioactive material
UNC
United nuclear corporation
KMP oml
iheUNC:
Notes
1The chromium interpolated surface was generated using surface
soil sample results from Quivira Mine in non-linear areas with
sufficient data available for interpolation.
2BTV is based on the 95 percent upper tolerance limit with 95
percent coverage of the background dataset.
'Results for soil samples are presented using the same color
scheme as the interpolated results.
Arroyo on
the UNC
ft
Interpolated Chromium (mg/kg)1
I I <6.3
I i 6.3-250
~ 250 - 500
I I >500
< BTV
BTV-PERG
PERG - 2 x PERG
>2x PERG
Soil Sample Locations3
~ Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
Radium-226 Removal Action Extent
Removal Action Extent
L i tenorm
Exposure Units
8 I CR-1
II I CR-1E
III 1 KMP on the NN
i I KMP on the UNC
1 | Arroyo on the NN
I I Arroyo on the UNC
Site-wide (Ecological Risk)
1 inch = 600 feet
1:7,200
600 300 0
N
W E
S
600
I Feet
CHROMIUM RESULTS
WITHIN THE
TENORM BOUNDARY
Prepared For: U.S. EPA Region 9
(
Prepared By:
TETRATECH
Task Order No.:
0001
QUIVIRA MINES
Contract No.:
68H E092 3 D0002
3/6/2024
Coordinate System:
NAD 1983 State Plane New Mexico West
FIPS 3003 Feet Transverse Mercator
Figure No.:
B-4
-------
Notes:
1The selenium interpolated surface was generated using surface
soil sample results from Quivira Mine in non-linear areas with
sufficient data available for interpolation.
2BTV is based on the 95 percent upper tolerance limit with 95
percent coverage of the background dataset.
3Results for soil samples are presented using the same color
scheme as the interpolated results.
Abbreviations:
BTV
CR-1
CR-1E
DAOS
HH
KMP
mg/kg
NN
PERG
TENORM
UNC
Background threshold value
Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1
Mine Site
Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1
East Mine Site
Di ficult access open space
Human health
Kerr-McGee Pond
Mi ligram per kilogram
Navajo Nation
Preliminary ecological removal goal
Technologica ly enhanced natura ly
occuring radioactive material
United nuclear corporation
* 1
"It
SELENIUM RESULTS
WITHIN THE
TENORM BOUNDARY
Task Order No.:
Contract No.:
68H E 09 2 3 D0002
QUIVIRA MINES
3/6/2024
Coordinate System:
NAD 1983 State Plane New Mexico West
FIPS 3003 Feet Transverse Mercator
Figure No.:
Interpolated Selenium (mg/kg)1
~~ s 2.5 < BTV2
m 2.5-3.4 BTV-PERG
~ 3.4-6.8 PERG - 2 x PERG
I I >6.8 > 2 x PERG
Soil Sample Locations3
~ Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
Ivi'.v-i-l Radium-226 Removal Action Extent
Removal Action Extent
L | TENORM
Exposure Units
I I CR-1
5 I CR-1E
I I KMP on the NN
j I KMP on the UNC
II 1 Arroyo on the NN
[f ] Arroyo on the UNC
Site-wide (Ecological Risk)
1 inch = 600 feet *
W^>-- E
1:7,200 I
s
600 300 0 600
~i Feet
Prepared For: U.S. EPA Region 9
Site Features
~ Waste Rock Area
Former Stockpile Area
TETRATECH
Prepared By:
-------
Notes:
'The uranium interpolated surface was generated using surface
soil sample results from Quivira Mine in non-linear areas with
sufficient data available for interpolation,
2BTV is based on the 95 percent upper tolerance limit with 95
percent coverage of the background dataset. The RAG applies to
exposure units on the Navajo Nation only. Uranium was not
identified as a COC in exposure units on UNC property.
3Results for soil samples are presented using the same color
scheme as the interpolated results.
Abbreviations:
BTV
CR-1
CR-1E
COC
HH
KMP
mg/kg
NN
PERG
RAG
TENORM
UNC
Background threshold value
Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1
Mine Site
Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1
East Mine Site
Contaminant of concern
Human health
Kerr-McGee Pond
Mi ligram per kilogram
Navajo Nation
Preliminary ecological removal goal
Removal action goal
Technologica ly enhanced natura ly
occuring radioactive material
United nuclear corporation
Prepared For: U.S. EPA Region 9
Prepared By:
TETRATECH
*
it
URANIUM RESULTS
WITHIN THE
TENORM BOUNDARY
Task Order No.:
Contract No.:
68H E 09 2 3 D0002
QUIVIRA MINES
3/6/2024
Coordinate System:
NAD 1983 State Plane New Mexico West
FIPS 3003 Feet Transverse Mercator
Figure No.:
Interpolated Uranium (mg/kg)1
~ <2.4 ^BTV2
I I 2.4 - 3.2 BTV - RAG (HH PRG Resident)2
I I 3.2 - 250 RAG (HH PRG Resident) - PERG
~ >250 > PERG
Soil Sample Locations3
O Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
I>Radium-226 Removal Action Extent
Removal Action Extent
(_ j TENORM
Exposure Units
I I CR-1
I I CR-1E
8 I KMP on the NN
I I KMP on the UNC
Arroyo on the NN
(__J Arroyo on the UNC
Site-wide (Ecological Risk)
1 inch = 600 feet *
W^>-- E
1:7,200 J
s
600 300 0 600
~i Feet
Arroyo on
the NN
-------
Abbreviations:
BTV
Background threshold value
CR-1
Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1
Mine Site
CR-1E
Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1
East Mine Site
DAOS
Difficult access open space
HH
Human health
KMP
Kerr-McGee Pond
mg/kg
Milligram per kilogram
NN
Navajo Nation
PERG
Preliminary ecological removal goal
TENORM
Technologically enhanced naturally
occuring radioactive material
UNC
United nuclear corporation
Notes:
1The vanadium interpolated surface was generated using surface
soil sample results from Quivira Mine in nonlinear areas with
su ficient data available for interpolation.
2BTV is based on the 95 percent upper tolerance limit with 95
percent coverage of the background dataset.
"Results for soil samples are presented using the same color
scheme as the interpolated results.
Prepared By:
TETRATECH
Task Order No.:
Contract No.:
68H E 09 2 3 D0002
QUIVIRA MINES
3/6/2024
Coordinate System:
NAD 1983 State Plane New Mexico West
FIPS 3003 Feet Transverse Mercator
Figure No.:
Estimated Vanadium (mg/kg)1
<18 < BTV2
I I 18-80 BTV-PERG
80- 160 PERG - 2 x PERG
~ >160 > 2 x PERG
Soil Sample Locations4
~ Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
Radium-226 Removal Action Extent
Removal Action Extent
I TENORM
Exposure Units
I I CR-1
I I CR-1E
I I KMP on the NN
I I KMP on the UNC
I I Arroyo on the NN
Lj Arroyo on the UNC
Site-wide (Ecological Risk)
1 inch = 600 feet *
W^>-- E
1:7,200 I
s
600 300 0 600
~i Feet
VANADIUM RESULTS
WITHIN THE
TENORM BOUNDARY
Prepared For: U.S. EPA Region 9
Arroyo on
' theNN
Site Features
~ Waste Rock Area
Former Stockpile Area
-------
APPENDIX C
RISK ASSESSMENT
-------
Quivira Mines
Coyote Canyon, Pinedale, and Standing Rock
Chapters, Navajo Nation, New Mexico
Final
Appendix C
Risk Assessment
Response, Assessment, and Evaluation Services 2
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002
Task Order 001
March 2024
Submitted to
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Submitted by
Tetra Tech, Inc.
1999 Harrison Street, Suite 500
Oakland, CA 94612
TETRA TECH
-------
Appendix C: Quivira Mines Risk Assessment
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS C-iv
1.0 BACKGROUND AND ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING C-1
1.1 MINE HISTORY AND LOCATION C-1
1.2 GEOLOGY, HYDROGEOLOGY, AND HYDROLOGY C-2
1.2.1 Geology C-2
1.2.2 Hydrogeology C-3
1.2.3 Hydrology C-3
1.3 LAND USE C-4
1.4 ECOLOGICAL SETTING C-4
1.4.1 Climate C-5
1.4.2 Vegetation C-5
1.4.3 Wildlife C-6
1.4.4 Special Status Species C-6
2.0 DATA USED IN THE RISK ASSESSMENT C-7
2.1 AVAILABLE DATA C-7
2.2 DATA REDUCTION METHODS C-8
2.3 EXPOSURE UNITS C-8
2.4 EXPOSURE POINT CONCENTRATIONS C-9
2.5 EVALUATION OF SECULAR EQUILIBRIUM C-10
3.0 HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT C-l 1
3.1 DATA EVALUATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF CONTAMINANTS
OF POTENTIAL CONCERN C-l 1
3.2 EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT C-l 1
3.2.1 Conceptual Site Model C-l2
3.2.2 Human Health Receptors, Exposure Pathways, and Exposure
Parameters C-l 2
3.2.3 Exposure Parameters C-15
3.3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT C-15
3.3.1 Carcinogenic Effects C-15
3.3.2 Noncarcinogenic Effects C-l6
3.3.3 Sources of Toxicity Values and Other Contaminant-Specific
Parameters C-l 6
3.4 RISK CHARACTERIZATION C-16
3.4.1 Estimates of Cancer Risk and Noncancer Hazard C-16
3.4.2 Uncertainty Associated with the Human Health Risk Assessment C-19
4.0 ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT C-22
4.1 PROBLEM FORMULATION C-22
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001 C-i
-------
Appendix C: Quivira Mines Risk Assessment
4.1.1 Ecological Habitat and Biological Resources C-23
4.1.2 Stressors and Contaminants of Potential Ecological Concern
Selection C-23
4.1.3 Potentially Complete Exposure Pathways C-23
4.1.4 Assessment Endpoints C-24
4.1.5 Measurement Endpoints C-24
4.1.6 Conceptual Site Model C-26
4.2 ANALYSIS OF EXPOSURE AND EFFECTS C-26
4.2.1 Exposure Estimates C-26
4.2.2 Ecological Effects C-26
4.3 RISK CHARACTERIZATION C-27
4.3.1 Screening-Level Ecological Risk Assessment for Contaminants of
Potential Ecological Concern C-27
4.3.2 Screening-Level Ecological Risk Assessment Refinement C-27
4.3.3 Candidate Contaminants of Ecological Concern C-28
4.4 UNCERTAINTY ASSOCIATED WITH THE ECOLOGICAL RISK
ASSESSMENT C-29
4.4.1 Exposure Estimates C-29
4.4.2 Nondetected Contaminants of Potential Ecological Concern C-31
4.4.3 Combined Exposures Across Media and Exposure Units C-31
4.4.4 Risk to Plant and Invertebrate Communities C-31
5.0 RISK ASSESSMENT RESULTS SUMMARY C-32
6.0 REFERENCES C-34
EXHIBITS
Exhibit C-l. Receptors Evaluated at Each Exposure Unit C-13
Exhibit C-2. Cancer Risks and Noncancer Hazards C-l7
Exhibit C-3. Candidate COCs Identified Based on Cancer Risks and Noncancer Hazards C-18
Exhibit C-4. Site-Wide Candidate COECs C-29
Exhibit C-5. Candidate Contaminants of Concern or Contaminants of Ecological Concern
for Soil C-33
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001 C-ii
-------
Appendix C: Quivira Mines Risk Assessment
FIGURES
Figure C-l. Mine Location
Figure C-2. Exposure Units and Sample Locations
Figure C-3. Quivira Church Rock No. 1 Mine Exposure Unit with Sample Locations - West Side
Figure C-4. Quivira Church Rock No. 1 Mine Exposure Unit with Sample Locations - East Side
Figure C-5. Quivira Church Rock No. 1 East Mine Exposure Unit with Sample Locations
Figure C-6. Kerr-McGee Ponds on the Navajo Nation Exposure Unit with Sample Locations
Figure C-7. Kerr-McGee Ponds on United Nuclear Corporation Property Exposure Unit with
Sample Locations
Figure C-8. Arroyos on the Navajo Nation Exposure Unit with Sample Locations
Figure C-9. Arroyos on United Nuclear Corporation Property Exposure Unit with Sample
Locations
Figure C-10. Quivira Mines Risk Assessment Conceptual Site Model
TABLES
Table C-l. Soil Results Data Summary and Contaminant of Potential Concern Screening
Table C-2. Exposure Unit Summary of Land Use, Geologic Formation, Type, Area, and
Available Samples
Table C-3. Human Health Exposure Parameters
Table C-4. Exposure Point Concentrations for Human Health Risk Assessment
Table C-5.1. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Quivira Church Rock Mine No. 1
Table C-5.2. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Quivira Church Rock Mine No. 1
East
Table C-5.3. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Kerr-McGee Ponds on the Navajo
Nation
Table C-5.4. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Kerr-McGee Ponds on United
Nuclear Corporation Property
Table C-5.5. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Arroyos on the Navajo Nation
Table C-5.6. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Arroyos on United Nuclear
Corporation Property
Table C-6. Human Health Risk and Hazard Summary by Exposure Pathway
Table C-7. Human Health Risk and Hazard Summary and Identification of Candidate
Contaminants of Concern
Table C-8. Ecological Risk Assessment Screening for Soil
Table C-9. Exposure Point Concentrations for Ecological Risk Assessment
Table C-10. Comparison of Individual Sample Results to Plant and Invertebrate NOECs
Table C-l 1. Screening-Level Ecological Risk Assessment Refinement for Soil - Birds
Table C-l2. Screening-Level Ecological Risk Assessment Refinement for Soil - Mammals
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment C-l. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
C-iii
-------
Appendix C: Quivira Mines Risk Assessment
**
It
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATION
J
°F
Degree Fahrenheit
bgs
Below ground surface
CERCLA
COC
COEC
COPC
COPEC
CR-1
CR-1E
CSM
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
Contaminant of concern
Contaminant of ecological concern
Contaminant of potential concern
Contaminant of potential ecological concern
Quivira Church Rock Mine No. 1
Quivira Church Rock Mine No. 1 East
Conceptual site model
Eco-SSL Ecological soil screening level
EE/CA Engineering evaluation/cost analysis
EPC Exposure point concentration
ERA Ecological risk assessment
ERICA Environmental Risks from Ionizing Contaminants: Assessment and
Management
ESA Endangered Species Act
ESL Ecological screening level
EU Exposure unit
HHRA Human health risk assessment
HI Hazard index
HQ Hazard quotient
IUR Inhalation unit risk
Kerr-McGee Kerr-McGee Corporation
LANL Los Alamos National Laboratory
LOEC Lowest observed effect concentration
mg/kg-day Milligram per kilogram per day
N3B Newport News Nuclear BWXT-Los Alamos, LLC
NAUM Navajo abandoned uranium mine
NESL Navajo Endangered Species List
NNEPA Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency
NNDFW Navajo Nation Department of Fish and Wildlife
NOEC No observed effect concentration
NORM Naturally occurring radioactive material
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
C-iv
-------
Appendix C: Quivira Mines Risk Assessment
**
It
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS (CONTINUE
I
J
ODL
ORNL
OSWER
Other Dine Lifeways
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
Quivira Mines Quivira Mines Site
RfC Reference concentration
RfD Reference dose
RME Reasonable maximum exposure
RSL Regional screening level
SE Secular equilibrium
SF Slope factor
SLERA Screening-level ecological risk assessment
TENORM Technologically enhanced naturally occurring radioactive material
Tetra Tech Tetra Tech, Inc.
TCR Target cancer risk
U3O8 Triuranium octoxide
UCL95 95 percent upper confidence limit
UNC United Nuclear Corporation
USEPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Weston Weston Solutions, Inc.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
C-v
-------
Appendix C: Quivira Mines Risk Assessment
It
1.0 BACKGROUND AND ENVIRONMENTAL SETTIN
J
The purpose of the risk assessment is to estimate current and future human health risk under
appropriate reasonable maximum exposure (RME) scenarios and ecological risk focused on the
known ecosystems for the region. The results of the risk assessment are used to assist in removal
action decisions at the Quivira Mines Site (Quivira Mines). This Navajo abandoned uranium
mine (NAUM) risk assessment was performed using "Guidance on Conducting Non-Time-
Critical Removal Actions under Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act (CERCLA)" (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [USEPA] 1993) and, thus,
does not include or require all elements of a baseline risk assessment (USEPA 1993, 2001). The
human health risk assessment (HHRA) identifies human health contaminants of concern (COC)
recommended for removal in each exposure unit (EU) while the ecological risk assessment
(ERA) identifies contaminants of ecological concern (COEC) recommended for removal in each
EU. The results of the risk assessment are used to determine removal action goals and serve as
lines of evidence in determining the extent of soil removal necessary at the Quivira Mines to
meet the removal action goals. See the NAUM risk assessment methodology (USEPA 2024b)
report for additional information for conducting standardized risk assessments at NAUM sites.
The Navajo Nation contains areas of naturally high levels of uranium. Starting in the 1940s,
large amounts of uranium were mined on the Navajo Nation. Mining has brought more uranium
to the surface of the earth, making exposure to people more likely. Uranium is a naturally
occurring radioactive material (NORM), and the effects of mining can lead to technologically
enhanced naturally occurring radioactive material (TENORM).
Examples of TENORM at the Quivira Mines include waste rock piles, waste in former settling
and dewatering ponds, contaminated former industrial areas, contaminated onsite access roads,
areas contaminated by eroding waste and windblown dust, and adjacent arroyos receiving
contaminated runoff.
1.1 MINE HISTORY AND LOCATION
The Quivira Mines are located on the Navajo Nation approximately 20 miles northeast of Gallup,
New Mexico (Figure C-l). The Quivira Mines include two former mine leases: Quivira Church
Rock Mine No. 1 (CR-1) and Quivira Church Rock Mine No. 1 East (CR-1E), both in Coyote
Canyon and Standing Rock Chapters of the Navajo Nation. The two former mines are about
0.5 mile apart from each other, with CR-1 located along Red Water Pond Road north of New
Mexico State Road 566 and CR-1E located east of and along Indian Route 7049 (Pipeline
Canyon Road) (see Figure 1 of the main engineering evaluation/cost analysis [EE/CA] report).
Aboveground operations encompass 42 acres at CR-1 and 10.5 acres at CR-1E, each including a
former industrial area, waste rock area, and former pond area (see Figure 2 and Figure 3 of the
main EE/CA report).
Atomic Energy Commission records indicate that during operation between 1974 and 1986, an
estimated 1.3 million tons of ore from CR-1 and CR-1E was shipped to and processed at the
Quivira Mining Corporation's Ambrosia Lake Mill, approximately 50 miles to the east and north
of Grants, New Mexico. A total of 3,139,784 pounds of uranium (triuranium octoxide [U3O8])
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
C-l
-------
Appendix C: Quivira Mines Risk Assessment
It
were produced from CR-1 and 1,447,463 pounds of U3O8 were produced from CR-1E (Weston
Solutions, Inc. [Weston] 2010).
The Quivira Mines were very large underground uranium mines located approximately 1,500 to
1,800 feet below ground surface (bgs). The mines were wet and required ongoing dewatering
during operations. Water pumped from the mine workings was discharged to settling ponds that
emptied to Unnamed Arroyo #2 and Pipeline Canyon Arroyo (Figure C-l).
The Kerr-McGee Corporation (Kerr-McGee) Ponds covers an area of approximately 9 acres and
includes four sediment dewatering ponds and a proto ore storage area on United Nuclear
Corporation (UNC) land previously leased from the State of New Mexico (see Figure 4 of the
main EE/CA report). The former Kerr-McGee Ponds are approximately 2,000 feet south of
CR-1E within the Pinedale Chapter of the Navajo Nation. Pond sediment and proto ore was
received from CR-1 and CR-1E mines. The various work areas were reportedly closed when the
State of New Mexico transferred the land at the mill to UNC.
See Section 2.1 of the main EE/CA report for additional information on the history and location
of the Quivira Mines.
1.2 GEOLOGY, HYDROGEOLOGY, AND HYDROLOGY
The following subsections describe the geology, hydrogeology, and hydrology of the Quivira
Mines. For more information, see Section 2.1.5 of the main EE/CA report.
1.2.1 Geology
The Quivira Mines lie within the Colorado Plateau physiographic province at the juncture of the
San Juan Basin, Zuni Uplift, and Defiance Uplift. Underlying the Quivira Mines is the Crevasse
Canyon Formation that consists of unsaturated mudstones, sandstone, and coal beds. Beneath the
Crevasse Canyon Formation are the Gallup and Mancos Shale Formations. The Mancos Shale,
with a thickness of 500 to 800 feet, acts largely as an aquitard. Beneath the Mancos Shale
Formation are the Dakota and Morrison Formations. The primary uranium ore body is found in
the Westwater Canyon Sandstone Member of the Morrison Formation.
Surface geology (see Figure 5 of the main EE/CA report) differs in each area of the
Quivira Mines:
• CR-1 surface geology consists of the Dalton and Bartlett Barren Members of the
Crevasse Canyon Formation and the Mulatto Tongue of Mancos Shale on the northern
slopes and Quaternary alluvium on the southern slopes.
• CR-1E surface geology consists of the Dalton Member of the Crevasse Canyon
Formation on the northern hillslopes and the Mulatto Tongue of Mancos Shale and
Quaternary alluvium on the site terrace.
• The former Kerr-McGee Ponds is on fluvially deposited Quaternary alluvium
that overlies the Mulatto Tongue of Mancos Shale, which is expressed on
south-adjacent hillslopes.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
C-2
-------
Appendix C: Quivira Mines Risk Assessment
It
No mineralization occurs in the surface geologies; however, areas of elevated activity are present
north of CR-1. Soil types throughout the Quivira Mines are shown on Figure 6 of the main
EE/CA report. Additional information on site geology is provided in Section 2.1.5.1 of the main
EE/CA report.
The waste rock material within the stockpiles at CR-1 and CR-1E is a fine-grained material.
In general, the soil stratigraphy at the base of both the Unnamed Arroyo #2 and the Pipeline
Arroyo is consistent with the fine- to medium-grained soils encountered at the lease areas of
CR-1 and CR-1E.
1.2.2 Hydrogeology
The main uranium-bearing rock unit (Morrison Formation) includes the water-bearing Westwater
Canyon Member. Based on data provided by UNC for the Northeast Church Rock Mine, the
depth to groundwater in the Westwater Canyon Sandstone Member is 1,500 to 1,800 feet
(Weston 2010).
Rainfall and surface water infiltration do not directly impact groundwater in the Westwater
Canyon Member as a result of a combination of arid climate, depth to groundwater, and the
number and thickness of intervening confining layers. In addition, no drinking water wells are
completed in the Westwater Canyon Member near the Quivira Mines. Therefore, groundwater is
not considered in the risk assessment. If any work is considered necessary to address
groundwater in the future, that work will be part of a separate action. The scope of this EE/CA is
to present alternatives for surface and near-surface soil remedies only. Additional information on
site hydrogeology is provided in Section 2.1.5.2 of the main EE/CA report.
1.2.3 Hydrology
Most precipitation at the Quivira Mines occurs from July to October as monsoon thunderstorms.
The annual evaporation rate is nearly five times the precipitation rate; consequently, most
streams in the area are ephemeral or have flowing water only during storms or rapid snowmelt.
The dry conditions and high-intensity rains cause quick saturation of the surface soils, preventing
precipitation from penetrating deeper. As a result, intense rainfall drives surface flow into
canyon washes, generating short-term and fast-moving streams. These streams produce arroyos
that cut through the sedimentary bedrock in the canyons and erode sediments that are transported
downstream to be deposited as alluvium.
A series of arroyos exist throughout the Quivira Mines and surrounding areas. Unnamed Arroyo
#2 runs along the southern boundary of CR-1 while the Pipeline Canyon Arroyo is immediately
southeast of CR-1E (Figure C-l). The width of Unnamed Arroyo #2 typically ranges from 15 to
35 feet with sidewalls 10 to 15 feet high. The width of the Pipeline Canyon Arroyo typically
ranges from 15 to 25 feet with sidewalls 10 to 25 feet high. Additional information on site
hydrogeology is provided in Section 2.1.5.3 of the main EE/CA report.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
C-3
-------
Appendix C: Quivira Mines Risk Assessment
It
1.3 LAND USE
The Quivira Mines are in a sparsely vegetated area of shrubs, grasses, and forbs mixed with
pinyon-juniper forests. In some places, the underbrush is predominately sagebrush (Artemisia
tridentata ssp. Tridentata), while in others, heavily grazed areas of bare ground are prevalent.
More than 50 Navajo families live in the Red Water Pond Road area of the Coyote Canyon
Chapter and the Pipeline Canyon Road area of the Standing Rock Chapter (Red Water Pond
Road Community Association and Southwest Research and Information Center 2012). Figure 8
of the main EE/CA report shows the approximate locations of the Red Water Pond Road and
Pipeline Canyon Road community areas. The nearest residences are approximately 700 feet
south of CR-1 and 800 feet north of CR-1E. No public or commercial buildings are within
0.5 mile of the Quivira Mines.
Current surrounding land use includes agricultural grazing (for livestock such as sheep, cattle,
and horses). Navajo families may collect pinyon nuts, herbs, and plants from the surrounding
area for food, medicinal, and ceremonial purposes.
The Quivira Mines, as well as the former Kerr-McGee Ponds and arroyos on the Navajo Nation,
are currently undeveloped. Activities that occur near or on the site that may expose people to soil
contaminants include walking or hiking, livestock grazing, and foraging for plants or herbs.
Future development may also expose residents to impacted soil. Radionuclides and other
chemicals in the soil may be absorbed by plants and consumed by livestock, wildlife, and people.
Persons traversing the site may be exposed to contaminated dust by inhalation of particulate
matter. Whole body (external) radiation may be experienced by nearby people on or near the
Quivira Mines. The portion of the former Kerr-McGee Ponds on UNC property has a few
buildings and trailers within the property boundary.
While the Quivira Mines site is fenced and the current use of the immediately surrounding areas
is open space, a residential land use scenario was developed to incorporate an unrestricted tribal
use scenario that may include future residential and cultural and ceremonial uses of the resources
at the Quivira Mines. This receptor is appropriate because the nearby land use is residential and
no land use restrictions are in place to prevent the site from being used for future residential use.
1.4 ECOLOGICAL SETTING
The Quivira Mines are in a remote area with a revegetated, previously disturbed mine area
potentially providing habitat for ecological receptors. Wildlife inhabiting the Quivira Mines may
directly ingest radionuclides and chemicals, which may then be transported to the organs or other
sites within the wildlife receptor.
The Quivira Mines are primarily within an Area 3 wildlife sensitive area as identified by the
Navajo Nation Department of Fish and Wildlife (NNDFW). Area 3 wildlife sensitive areas
are classified as a less sensitive area containing a low and fragmented concentration of
endangered and rare plant, animal, and game species on the Navajo Nation (NNDFW 2022).
Therefore, development can proceed as recommended by NNDFW with few exceptions. A
small portion of the Quivira Mines on the northwest side is within an Area 1 wildlife sensitive
area. Area 1 wildlife sensitive areas are classified as highly sensitive areas containing the best
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
C-4
-------
Appendix C: Quivira Mines Risk Assessment
It
habitat and highest concentrations of endangered and rare plant, animal, and game species on the
Navajo Nation. NNDFW recommends no development in Area 1 wildlife sensitive areas with
few exceptions.
Tetra Tech, Inc. (Tetra Tech) (2022a) conducted a biological assessment for the Quivira Mines
area that included a desktop survey of habitats to assess the impacts that investigative and future
removal activities may have on affected Endangered Species Act (ESA)-listed species, critical
habitats, migratory birds protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, and NNDFW-listed
sensitive species that may occur within 0.5 mile of the site. Plants were also included in the
desktop survey.
Tetra Tech (2022b) also conducted a field survey at the Quivira Mines area before investigation
activities in May 2022 and observed no rare plant species, plant species of management interest,
or federally listed or sensitive species.
1.4.1 Climate
The Navajo Nation lies in a semi-arid climate with a high annual net pan evaporation rate of
54 inches per year. The nearby city of Gallup receives an average annual rainfall of 11 inches.
Wind for 11 months of the year typically originates from the southwest, and in the month of
August, originates predominantly from the south. The winter average temperature is 29 degrees
Fahrenheit (°F) with an average temperature in summer of 68 °F. Extreme heat in the summer
(100 °F) and cold in the winter (-34 °F) can occur. Additional information on site climate is
provided in Section 2.1.8 of the main EE/CA report.
1.4.2 Vegetation
A vegetation survey was completed in 2011 as part of the removal site evaluation report for the
Quivira Mines area (SENES Consultants Limited 2011). The survey identified good plant
diversity with a mixture of native shrubs, grasses, and forbs although cover values varied based
on grazing pressure. Tetra Tech (2022b) performed a rare plant survey in 2022 to assess the
potential for investigation activities to affect ESA-listed species, critical habitats, and NNDFW-
listed sensitive species.
The habitat in the Quivira Mines area consists of upland communities of intermountain basins
semi-desert grassland, intermountain basins greasewood flat, and intermountain basins
semi-desert shrub steppe bordered by Colorado Plateau pinyon-juniper woodlands. The field
survey identified the dominant species throughout the project footprint as sagebrush,
globemallow (Sphaeralcea ambigua), rabbitbrush (Ericameria nauseosa), filaree storksbill
(Erodium cicutarium), cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum), Indian ricegrass (Achnatherum
hymenoides), needle and thread grass (Hesperostipa comata), greasewood (Sarcobatus
vermiculatus), two-needle piny on (Pinus edulis), and Utah juniper (Juniperus osteosperma).
No plant species of management interest or rare plant species were observed during the surveys.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
C-5
-------
Appendix C: Quivira Mines Risk Assessment
It
1.4.3 Wildlife
Tetra Tech (2022b) performed a nesting bird survey in 2022 for the Quivira Mines area to assess
the potential for investigation activities to affect ESA-listed species, critical habitats, migratory
birds protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, and NNDFW-listed sensitive species. All
suitable nesting areas were surveyed during the field survey, and no active raptor species nests
were identified. However, one common raven (Corvus corax) nest was located between CR-1
and CR-1E. Avian and wildlife species observed at the Quivira Mines were the common raven,
house finch (Haemorphous mexicanus), rock wren (Salpinctes obsoletus), Gunnison prairie dog
(Cynomysgunnisoni), western fence lizard (Sceloporus occidentalis), and bullsnake (Pituophis
catenifer sayl).
1.4.4 Special Status Species
Tetra Tech (2022a) conducted a biological assessment for the Quivira Mines that reviewed the
most recent species lists for the area provided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
NNDFW. All potential species in the area that are federally threatened, endangered, candidates
for listing, or included on the Navajo Endangered Species List (NESL) were evaluated for
potential to occur at the site. The biological assessment concluded that no federally listed species
have the potential to occur in the Quivira Mines area and that no critical habitats for any
ESA-listed species are within the area. The biological assessment concluded that the current
proposed action for the Quivira Mines, which includes surface and subsurface soil sampling,
trenching, detention basin cleanout, and well construction, will have no effect on the Mexican
spotted owl (Strix occidentalis lucida), southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii
extimus), yellow-billed cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus ssp. Occidentalis), Zuni bluehead sucker
(Catostomus discobolusyarrowl), or Zuni fleabane (Erigeron rhizomatus), and have no effect on
these species' designated critical habitats. A separate assessment may be required for
construction activities that will occur over a longer time frame during any removal action.
The Tetra Tech (2022a) biological assessment identified three NESL species with the potential to
occur in the Quivira Mines area: golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos), mountain plover (Charadrius
montanus), and Naturita milk-vetch (Astragalus naturitensis)', however, these species do not
require an effects determination. The biological assessment identified conservation measures for
NESL species to protect the continued existence of the above-listed species in the Quivira Mines
area during the proposed removal action.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
C-6
-------
Appendix C: Quivira Mines Risk Assessment
It
2.0 DATA USED IN THE RISK ASSESSMENT
J
Data compilation and management tasks conducted for the Quivira Mines risk assessment
included the selection of useable data, evaluation of sample depth intervals, and selection of
depth intervals to be evaluated. At this time, gamma data are not considered definitive data and,
therefore, were not used in the risk assessment. However, gamma data were used to delineate
TENORM boundaries and to establish the footprint for risk assessment and will be used for
future removal decisions.
The compiled investigation data for the constituents of interest (COI) were reviewed to ensure
that the appropriate data were used for the evaluation of each EU. Essential nutrients such as
calcium, magnesium, potassium, and sodium are not retained as COIs. Separation of data into the
depth intervals to be evaluated, and calculation of the exposure point concentration (EPC) and
other statistical values.
Figure C-2 provides an overview of the locations of the available soil samples used in the risk
assessment for the Quivira Mines.
2.1 AVAILABLE DATA
Evaluation of potential human and ecological exposures at the Quivira Mines is limited to
radionuclides and metals in soil. Soil samples were collected from 0 up to 72 inches bgs.
Table C-l provides the summary of all available sample results for the Quivira Mines risk
assessment. Table C-2 provides the summary of soil samples available for each Quivira Mines
EU. No speciation data are available for chromium; therefore, chromium is assumed to be
100 percent hexavalent chromium. Attachment C-l presents the complete dataset for all
available soil samples used in the Quivira Mines risk assessment.
A data useability assessment is conducted to confirm that the useability of the laboratory data is
consistent with USEPA guidance (1992b). Data validation of all results used in the risk
assessment should be performed per the guidelines for data review (USEPA 2004, 2020). Data
validation reports should be reviewed, and the following key data validation flags should be
considered in the data reduction process:
• Estimated values (flagged with "J" qualifiers) should be treated as detected
concentrations.
• Rejected data (flagged with "R" qualifiers) should not be included in the risk assessment
datasets because of deficiencies in meeting quality control criteria.
• Results with final validation qualifiers containing a "U" or "UJ" are nondetect values
included as part of the risk assessment datasets. The method reporting limit should be
used as the value for nondetect results.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
C-7
-------
Appendix C: Quivira Mines Risk Assessment
It
2.2 DATA REDUCTION METHODS
The metals and radiological data were queried to select the best result for each unique
combination of sample media, location ID, sample date, and sample depth for which duplicate
data exist. These procedures conservatively select one result for original and field duplicate
pairs. For duplicate samples, the maximum detected concentration of the original and field
duplicate result was selected as the result for use in the risk assessment. If both the original and
field duplicate result are nondetect, the result associated with the lower reporting limit was used.
The complete dataset used in the risk assessment is provided in Attachment C-1.
2.3 EXPOSURE UNITS
An EU is an area where receptors (a person or animal) may reasonably be assumed to move at
random and where contact across the EU is equally likely over the course of an exposure
duration. The Quivira Mines EUs were developed by identifying areas of contiguous TENORM
contamination and anticipated land use. Areas of NORM, such as natural mineralized outcrops
and nonimpacted areas in the northeastern portion of the site, although not included in the
TENORM boundary, were also included within the risk assessment boundary because a receptor
would also be exposed to the NORM areas when at the site. See Section 2.0 of the main
EE/CA report for descriptions of the previous investigations and extent of contamination at
the Quivira Mines.
Based on the site evaluation and summarized in Table C-2, the following EUs were identified at
the Quivira Mines. The ecological risk assessment evaluation is conducted on a site-wide basis.
• CR-1 - The former CR-1 mine is located on the Navajo Nation and is 53 acres. Several
residences are located nearby with the nearest residence approximately 700 feet from the
former mine. Therefore, the Kee'da'whii teeh (full-time Navajo resident) was selected as
the RME receptor for the CR-1 EU.
• CR-1E - The former CR-1E mine is located on the Navajo Nation and is 14 acres.
Several residences are located nearby with the nearest residence approximately 800 feet
from the former mine. Therefore, the Kee'da'whii teeh (full-time Navajo resident) was
selected as the RME receptor for the CR-1E EU.
• Former Kerr-McGee Ponds on the Navajo Nation - A 2-acre portion of the former
Kerr-McGee Ponds is located on the Navajo Nation. Several residences are located
nearby with the nearest residence approximately 3,000 feet from the Kerr-McGee Ponds.
Therefore, the Kee'da'whii teeh (full-time Navajo resident) was selected as the RME
receptor for the CR-1E EU.
• Former Kerr-McGee Ponds on UNC Property - A 19-acre portion of the former
Kerr-McGee Ponds is on privately-owned land and fenced property. Therefore, the
UNC outdoor worker was selected as the RME receptor for the Kerr-McGee Ponds on
UNC property.
• Arroyos on the Navajo Nation - A 16-acre portion of the impacted arroyos is on the
Navajo Nation. The impacted arroyos are deep with steep sides and, thus, difficult
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
C-8
-------
Appendix C: Quivira Mines Risk Assessment
It
to access. Therefore, the Kqq ei doo nahaazah dah (difficult access open space) was
selected as the RME receptor for the affected arroyos on the Navajo Nation.
• Arroyos on UNC Property - A 3-acre portion of the impacted arroyos is on
privately-owned land and fenced property. Therefore, the UNC outdoor worker was
selected as the RME receptor for the affected arroyos on UNC property.
• Site-Wide - A 137-acre area that encompasses all the human health EUs for evaluation
of the ecological receptors at the Quivira Mines.
The existing or anticipated future land use for an area is key in determining the potential
receptors evaluated in the HHRA conducted for a site. Local chapters determine how areas
within their jurisdiction can and cannot be used.
This HHRA only evaluates the RME receptors at an EU. For the EUs on the Navajo Nation,
except for the arroyos, the Navajo-specific receptor of Kee'da'whii teeh (full-time Navajo
resident) was identified as the RME receptor. The arroyos are deep with very steep sides and
difficult to access; thus, for the arroyos on the Navajo Nation, the Navajo-specific receptor of
Kqq ei doo nahaazah dah (difficult access open space) was identified as the RME receptor. For
the EUs on UNC property, the site-specific UNC outdoor worker was identified as the RME
receptor. Figure C-3 through Figure C-9 provide the locations of samples used in the risk
assessment for each EU.
2.4 EXPOSURE POINT CONCENTRATIONS
To calculate concentrations in environmental media (for example, surface soil) to which people
and ecological receptors might be exposed, representative statistics are calculated from the
datasets for each EU. The available soil data for the site were divided by the EUs identified in
Section 2.3 Soil samples are further divided by sample depth to correspond to the surface and
subsurface soil intervals evaluated in the risk assessment. Surface soil samples are those
collected from 0 to 6 inches bgs while subsurface soil samples are those collected from 0 up to
72 inches bgs. As described in the NAUM risk assessment methodology (USEPA 2024b), these
soil depths were selected to incorporate the use of more of the available data from the NAUM
sites. A depth of 72 inches was selected for potential human health exposures because deeper soil
could become exposed in the future by erosion. In addition, plants in desert settings commonly
have roots to 72 inches bgs. Thus, uptake to plants from contamination at depth is a complete
exposure pathway for both the HHRA and ERA. Furthermore, burrowing animals are evaluated
in the ERA; 72 inches bgs is an appropriate exposure depth for evaluating these ecological
receptors, which may be hunted by members of the Navajo Nation.
The process provided in Appendix D of the NAUM risk assessment methodology (USEPA
2024b) report was used to calculate the EPC for each COPC. The approach and calculations for
EPCs follow USEPA (1989, 1992c, 2000a, 2002, 2015) guidance. The 95 percent upper
confidence limit (UCL95) of the mean values were calculated for each COPC using ProUCL 5.2
(USEPA 2022b). A minimum of 10 samples and 4 detected results are required for a given
contaminant to calculate the UCL95 that can be used as the EPC. If the dataset was smaller than
10 samples or the number of detections was less than 4, the maximum detected concentration
should be used as the EPC. In cases where the UCL95 exceeds the maximum detected
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
C-9
-------
Appendix C: Quivira Mines Risk Assessment
It
concentration, the maximum detected concentration was used as the soil EPC. If a
nonradioactive COPC was not detected in a sample when entering data into ProUCL, the sample
reporting limit was used as the numerical value for that sample for EPC calculations.
2.5 EVALUATION OF SECULAR EQUILIBRIUM
A site-specific secular equilibrium (SE) evaluation was conducted on the Quivira Mines dataset.
A range of equilibrium conditions were observed; however, the overall conclusion is that
uranium-238 is not in SE with thorium-230 or radium-226. Thus, uranium-238, uranium-234,
and thorium-230 will be included in the risk calculations along with radium-226 in SE. The
assumption that radium-226 in SE is health protective (USEPA 2024b).
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
C-10
-------
Appendix C: Quivira Mines Risk Assessment
It
3.0 HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT
J
The HHRA evaluates whether site-related contaminants detected in soil pose unacceptable risks
to potential current and future people at a site under conditions at the time of the EE/CA
(unremediated conditions) (USEPA 1989). The HHRA results will serve, along with other
factors (such as the ERA and the three National Contingency Plan and EE/CA criteria of
feasibility, implementability, and cost), as a basis for risk management decisions. The HHRA is
intended to provide input for risk management decision-making for a site while maintaining a
conservative approach protective of the people. The methodology for the HHRA is based on the
NAUM risk assessment methodology (USEPA 2024b). Table C-l through Table C-7 present
data and analysis associated with the HHRA.
3.1 DATA EVALUATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF CONTAMINANTS OF
POTENTIAL CONCERN
All samples collected between 0 and 72 inches below ground surface (bgs) and analyzed by a
certified laboratory were used to screen for contaminants of potential concern (COPC) for the
HHRA. Samples at the Quivira Mines were analyzed for metals and radionuclides. The
maximum detected concentrations of contaminants were screened using the Kee'da'whii teeh
(full-time Navajo resident) soil screening levels using a target cancer risk (TCR) of 1 in 1 million
(1x10 6) and a noncancer target hazard quotient of 0.1 provided in the NAUM risk assessment
methodology (USEPA 2024b) report. These conservative screening levels were used to ensure
contaminants that could substantially contribute to cumulative cancer risk are retained in the risk
calculations and that the contaminants affecting the same target organ are accounted for in the
noncancer hazard calculations. For contaminants with both cancer and noncancer health effects,
the lower of the two screening levels was used for screening.
Any contaminant with a maximum detected concentration exceeding its COPC screening level is
retained as a COPC for the HHRA risk calculations. Table C-l provides the COPC screening for
the available Quivira Mines data. Based on the screening, the following contaminants were
identified as COPCs and are included in the risk estimates in the HHRA: uranium-238,
uranium-234, thorium-230, radium-226, aluminum, arsenic, barium, cadmium, cobalt, copper,
iron, manganese, molybdenum, selenium, thallium, uranium, and vanadium.
3.2 EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT
The exposure assessment is the process of measuring or estimating intensity, frequency, and
duration of human exposure to a contaminant in the environment. The exposure assessment
considers land use assumptions, discusses the mechanisms by which people might contact
COPCs in environmental media, and characterizes exposure factors (for example, time on site).
The intake assumptions are combined with the estimated concentration for each COPC at each
EU, called the EPC (see Section 2.4), to quantitatively estimate the contaminant exposure for the
receptors at a given EU. The EPCs used in the HHRA, grouped by EU and soil depth interval,
are presented in Table C-4. In accordance with USEPA (1989) guidance, an exposure assessment
consists of three steps:
1. Characterization of the exposure setting (physical environment and potential receptors)
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
C-ll
-------
Appendix C: Quivira Mines Risk Assessment
2. Identification of exposure pathways (constituent sources, exposure points, and
exposure routes)
3. Quantification of pathway-specific exposures (receptor intake calculations using the
EPC and exposure assumptions)
3.2.1 Conceptual Site Model
The risk assessment CSM describes the exposure setting and identifies potentially complete
exposure pathways by which receptors (people, plants, and animals) could come in contact with
site-related contamination. The CSM is used throughout the site investigation and removal
processes to (1) provide a framework for addressing potential risks, (2) evaluate the need for
additional data acquisition activities, and (3) evaluate health risks and the need for corrective
measures. As defined in Volume 1, Part A, of the "Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund"
(USEPA 1989), the following four elements are necessary to form a complete exposure pathway:
• A source or release from a source
• A mechanism of release and transport
• A point of contact for potential receptors
• An exposure route
If any one of the four elements are missing, the exposure pathway is incomplete. In general,
only potentially complete exposure pathways are evaluated in the HHRA.
The removal actions at NAUM sites are focused on removing soil as the source of
contamination. Removal of contaminated soil should remove the source of contamination to
surface water and groundwater. For the HHRA, exposure to surface water or groundwater is
considered to be minimal as water is supplied on the Navajo Nation. At the Quivira Mines,
the presence of surface water is ephemeral. Thus, water exposure is not evaluated in the
Quivira Mines risk assessment; data collection was focused on the characterization of soil and
sediment only.
Soil and sediment data from 0 up to 72 inches bgs were used to evaluate potential risks to people.
Drainages at the site are dry for most of the year, and, therefore, sediment results were evaluated
as soil. See Section 2.4 of the main EE/CA report for further discussion on the sources and extent
of contamination. The site-specific CSM for the Quivira Mines is presented on Figure C-10.
3.2.2 Human Health Receptors, Exposure Pathways, and Exposure Parameters
The areas of concern for soil contamination at the Quivira Mines include the CR-1 and CR-1E
lease areas and specific step-out areas indicated by elevated radium-226 soil sampling results or
scan and static survey results. The arroyos adjacent to the mines, and former pond areas
downstream of the mines and arroyos, were also identified as areas of potential contamination
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
C-12
-------
Appendix C: Quivira Mines Risk Assessment
It
because of dewatering activities during mine operations. The following receptors were assumed
to present in the areas of potential contamination:
• Kee'da'whii teeh (full-time Navajo resident) at the mines and the portion of the former
Kerr-McGee Ponds on the Navajo Nation that are easy to access and relatively flat except
where waste rock piles are present
• Kqq ei doo nahaazah dah (difficult access open space) for the arroyos on the Navajo
Nation impacted by the mines (these areas include arroyos that are difficult to get to
because of challenging features such as steep sidewalls)
• UNC outdoor worker for the portions of the former Kerr-McGee Ponds and arroyos on
private property
Consistent with Superfund methodology, the risks and hazards related to removal activities at the
site are anticipated to be managed within acceptable levels using engineering controls and
personal protective equipment. Therefore, potential exposures to abandoned uranium mine
workers will not be evaluated in the risk assessment, but worker protections should be included
for removal actions at the site.
The CSM (Figure C-10) describes the exposure setting and identifies potentially complete
exposure pathways by which people could come contact site-related contamination.
Consistent with the NAUM risk assessment methodology (USEPA 2024b), the HHRA only
evaluates the RME individual at an EU. Exhibit C-l presents the RME receptor selected at each
EU and a description of the exposure scenario.
Exhibit C-1. Receptors Evaluated at Each Exposure Unit
Exposure Unit
Receptor Name
Receptor Description
CR-1, CR-1E,
and the portion
of Kerr-McGee
Ponds on the
Navajo Nation
Kee'da'whff teeh
(Full-Time Navajo
Resident)
Members of the Navajo Nation (adult and child) that live full
time at a site. Includes external exposure to radiation,
incidental ingestion of soil, dermal exposure to soil (metals
only), inhalation of soil (or dust), ingestion of homegrown
produce and gathered wild plants, and consumption of animal
products from raised animals (meat, milk, and eggs) and
hunted animals (meat), as well as plant exposures (ingestion,
dermal, and inhalation) from Dine lifeways practices including
medicinal and ceremonial exposures.
Arroyos on the
Navajo Nation
Kqq eidoo
nahaazah dah
(Difficult Access
Open Space)
A member of the Navajo Nation (adult and child) that enters
the arroyo 1 hour per day for 30 days a year to collect plants,
herd animals, or hunt. Includes external exposure to radiation,
incidental ingestion of soil, dermal exposure to soil (metals
only), inhalation of soil (or dust), ingestion of homegrown
produce and gathered wild plants, and consumption of animal
products from raised animals (meat and milk) and hunted
animals (meat), as well as plant exposures (ingestion, dermal,
and inhalation) from Dine lifeways practices including
medicinal and ceremonial exposures.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
C-13
-------
Appendix C: Quivira Mines Risk Assessment
It
Exhibit C-1. Receptors Evaluated at Each Exposure Unit (Continued)
Exposure Unit
Receptor Name
Receptor Description
Kerr-McGee
Ponds and
Arroyos on UNC
Property
UNC Outdoor
Worker
An adult worker that is assumed to be present on site for
8 hours per day, 2 days per week for 50 weeks per year.
Exposure pathways evaluated include external exposure to
radiation, incidental ingestion of soil, dermal exposure to soil
(metals only), and inhalation of soil (or dust).
Notes:
CR-1 Quivira Church Rock Mine No. 1
CR-1E Quivira Church Rock Mine No. 1 East
Kerr-McGee Kerr-McGee Corporation
UNC United Nuclear Corporation
The following list provides the RME scenarios evaluated at the Quivira Mines and the potentially
complete human exposure pathways. The specific exposure inputs for these receptors evaluated
in the HHRA are provided in Table C-3.
• Kee'da'whu teeh (Full-Time Navajo Resident - Adult and Child):
o Potential exposure to gamma radiation via external exposure
o Potential exposure to site-related contaminants in soil through incidental ingestion,
dermal contact, and inhalation
o Potential exposure to site-related contaminants in homegrown produce through
ingestion
o Potential exposure to site-related contaminants in gathered plants via ingestion or
inhalation or both and potential exposure to metals on gathered plants via dermal
contact (the plant exposure pathway includes use of plants for medicinal and
ceremonial purposes)
o Potential exposure to site-related contaminants in animal products (raised and hunted)
via ingestion
• Kqq ei doo nahaazah dah (Difficult Access Open Space - Adult and Child):
o Potential exposure to gamma radiation via external exposure
o Potential exposure to site-related contaminants in soil through incidental ingestion,
dermal contact, and inhalation
o Potential exposure to site-related contaminants in gathered plants via ingestion or
inhalation or both and potential exposure to metals present in gathered plants via
dermal contact (the plant exposure pathway includes use of plants for medicinal and
ceremonial purposes)
o Potential exposure to site-related contaminants in animal products (raised and hunted)
via ingestion
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
C-14
-------
Appendix C: Quivira Mines Risk Assessment
It
• UNC Outdoor Worker (Adult):
o Potential exposure to gamma radiation via external exposure
o Potential exposure to site-related contaminants in soil through incidental ingestion,
dermal contact, and inhalation
3.2.3 Exposure Parameters
Exposure inputs for the Navajo receptors are the Navajo Nation Environmental Protection
Agency (NNEPA) inputs for the receptors evaluated at the NAUM sites. The Navajo receptor
exposure parameters are provided in Table C-3. The rationale for the exposure inputs provided
by NNEPA are included as Attachment 1 of the NAUM risk assessment methodology (USEPA
2024b) report. Appendix B of the NAUM risk assessment methodology report provides
discussion of the non-standard exposure pathways evaluated in the Navajo-specific exposure
scenarios, including selection of input parameters for plant and animal consumption pathways.
The UNC outdoor worker scenario was developed with USEPA Region 9 for application to EUs
on properties owned by UNC. The input parameters for the UNC outdoor worker are provided in
Table C-3.
3.3 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT
The toxicity assessment describes the relationship between a dose of a contaminant and the
potential likelihood of an adverse health effect. The purpose of the toxicity assessment is to
quantitatively estimate the inherent toxicity of COPCs for use in risk characterization. Potential
effects of contaminants are separated into two categories: cancer and noncancer effects. Some
contaminants can cause cancer while others can cause noncancer health effects such as
neurological problems, kidney disease, and thyroid disease. Some contaminants, such as arsenic,
have both cancer and noncancer health effects. Potential health risks for radionuclide COPCs are
evaluated only for cancer risks while metals COPCs are evaluated for both cancer risk and
noncancer hazards as appropriate. No speciation data are available for chromium; therefore,
chromium is assumed to be 100 percent hexavalent chromium.
3.3.1 Carcinogenic Effects
For carcinogens, such as radionuclides, USEPA assumes that no dose is low enough to not cause
an adverse health effect and that the risk increases as the dose increases.
Potential carcinogenic effects resulting from human exposure to contaminants are estimated
quantitatively using cancer slope factors (SF), which represent the theoretical increased risk per
milligram of constituent intake per kilogram body weight per day (inverse of milligram per
kilogram per day, which is presented as [mg/kg-day]4). Oral SFs are toxicity values for
evaluating the probability of an individual developing cancer from oral exposure to contaminant
levels over a lifetime. The oral SF is also used in the dermal exposure pathway with an
absorption factor applied for the nonradioactive contaminants.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
C-15
-------
Appendix C: Quivira Mines Risk Assessment
The inhalation unit risk (IUR) factor is defined as the upper-bound excess lifetime cancer risk
estimated to result from continuous exposure to a chemical at a concentration of 1 microgram per
cubic meter in air. SFs or IUR factors are used to estimate a theoretical upper-bound lifetime
probability of an individual developing cancer as a result of exposure to a potential carcinogen.
3.3.2 Noncarcinogenic Effects
Potential noncarcinogenic effects resulting from human exposure to contaminants are generally
estimated quantitatively using chronic reference doses (RfD) and chronic reference
concentrations (RfC). The RfD, expressed in units of daily dose (in milligrams per kilogram per
day), is an estimate of the daily maximum level of exposure to human populations (including
sensitive sub-populations) that is likely to be without an appreciable risk of deleterious effects
(USEPA 1989). The oral RfD is also used in the dermal exposure pathway with an absorption
factor applied. USEPA has derived RfCs for inhalation exposures for some contaminants. An
inhalation RfC is similar to an RfD. If the concentration of a contaminant in air to which a
human is exposed is lower than the RfC, no appreciable risk for noncancer health effects results
from that exposure.
3.3.3 Sources of Toxicity Values and Other Contaminant-Specific Parameters
USEPA (2003) established a hierarchy of human health toxicity values for Superfund; this
hierarchy should be followed for selecting the toxicity values used in the HHRA. This HHRA
used the toxicity values used in the NAUM Risk Calculator (USEPA 2024c), which are provided
in Table 4 and Table 5 of the NAUM risk assessment methodology (USEPA 2024b) for
radionuclides and metals, respectively. This HHRA used the toxicity values used in the NAUM
Risk Calculator (USEPA 2024c) and provided in Table 4 and Table 5 of the NAUM risk
assessment methodology (USEPA 2024b) report for radionuclides and metals, respectively.
3.4 RISK CHARACTERIZATION
In general, risk characterization proceeds by combining the results of the exposure and toxicity
assessments. In standard Superfund HHRAs, exposures are calculated by use of medium-specific
EPCs and a series of pathway-specific exposure parameters. These exposures are then multiplied
or divided by analyte-specific toxicity values (for example, SFs, unit risk factors, RfDs, and
RfCs) to generate receptor- and exposure pathway-specific risks and hazards.
3.4.1 Estimates of Cancer Risk and Noncancer Hazard
Human health exposure factors were calculated for each applicable receptor and COPCs for all
the potentially complete soil-related exposure pathways. For metal COPCs with both
carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic toxicity, intake factors were calculated for both cancer and
noncancer for each relevant exposure pathway. The methods, assumptions, and inputs for the
calculation of the intake factors for each Navajo-specific scenario is provided in the NAUM risk
assessment methodology (USEPA 2024b) report. Table C-5.1 through Table C-5.6 present the
calculated cumulative cancer risk and noncancer hazard for each COPC for each EU by soil
depth interval. That is, the risk is summed for all the exposure pathways relevant to each
receptor.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
C-16
-------
Appendix C: Quivira Mines Risk Assessment
It
Table C-6 provides a summary of the cumulative risk by exposure pathway for each EU. This
HHRA only evaluates the RME receptor at an EU and these results are used for risk management
decisions for the site; however, cumulative site-wide cancer risks and noncancer hazards for a
receptor who is exposed to multiple Quivira Mines EUs is calculated and presented in the
uncertainty section (Section 3.4.2).
The intake factors used in the HHRA were calculated using the NAUM Risk Calculator (USEPA
2024c). The USEPA's RSL Calculator considers only direct soil exposures (for example, soil
ingestion, dermal contact, and inhalation of fugitive dust). The NAUM Risk Calculator generates
exposure pathway-specific cancer risks and noncancer hazards, including animal product and
produce consumption pathways, and exposure pathways specific to the Navajo, as well as
external exposure to radiation and direct exposure to radiation in soil through incidental
ingestion and inhalation. The complete set of equations and inputs for calculating exposure
inputs for Navajo receptors is provided in the NAUM risk assessment methodology (USEPA
2024b) report.
The cumulative cancer risk for the age-adjusted adult and child receptors and noncancer hazards
for the adult and child receptors for each EU and soil depth interval are provided in Table C-7
and summarized in Exhibit C-2.
Exhibit C-2. Cancer Risks and Noncancer Hazards
Exposure Unit
Soil Interval
Cancer Risk
Adult
Noncancer
Hazard
Child
Noncancer
Hazard
CR-1
Surface Soil
1x102
8
10
Subsurface Soil
3x102
8
10
CR-1 E
Surface Soil
2x10 2
8
10
Subsurface Soil
8x10 2
10
20
Kerr-McGee Ponds on the
Navajo Nation
Surface Soil
2x10 2
9
10
Subsurface Soil
2x10 2
9
10
Kerr-McGee Ponds on UNC
Property
Surface Soil
2x10 4
0.05
—
Subsurface Soil
2x10 4
0.08
—
Arroyos on the Navajo Nation
Surface Soil
6x10 4
5
0.5
Subsurface Soil
6x10 4
8
0.7
Arroyos on UNC Property
Surface Soil
2x10"5
0.03
—
Subsurface Soil
2x10"5
0.03
-
Notes:
Bolded values exceed the target cancer risk (1x104) or target hazard quotient (1).
Not applicable
CR-1 Quivira Church Rock Mine No. 1
CR-1E Quivira Church Rock Mine No. 1 East
Kerr-McGee Kerr-McGee Corporation
UNC United Nuclear Corporation
Candidate COCs are identified based on the cancer risk exceeding the TCR of 1x10 4 or a
noncancer hazard of 1 for the RME receptor at the EU. COPCs with a cancer risk within the
USEPA risk range of greater than 1x10 6 to 1x10 4 are indicated on Table C-7. Target organ
analyses were not performed for any scenario-media combination because no instances arose
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
C-17
-------
Appendix C: Quivira Mines Risk Assessment
It
where the target organ hazard index exceeded 1 and no individual COPC had a hazard
exceeding 1. Exhibit C-3 presents the candidate COCs for each EU as identified in Table C-7.
Exhibit C-3. Candidate COCs Identified Based on Cancer Risks and Noncancer Hazards
Exposure Unit
Soil Interval
Cancer Risk
Noncancer Hazard
CR-1
Surface Soil
Radium-226 in SE
Arsenic
Chromium1
Cobalt
Iron
Manganese
Thallium
Uranium
Subsurface Soil
Radium-226 in SE
Arsenic
Chromium1
Cobalt
Iron
Manganese
Thallium
Uranium
CR-1 E
Surface Soil
Radium-226 in SE
Arsenic
Chromium1
Arsenic
Cobalt
Iron
Manganese
Thallium
Uranium
Subsurface Soil
Radium-226 in SE
Arsenic
Chromium1
Arsenic
Cobalt
Iron
Manganese
Thallium
Uranium
Kerr-McGee Ponds on the
Navajo Nation
Surface Soil
Radium-226 in SE
Arsenic
Chromium1
Cobalt
Iron
Manganese
Thallium
Uranium
Subsurface Soil
Radium-226 in SE
Arsenic
Chromium1
Cobalt
Iron
Manganese
Thallium
Uranium
Kerr-McGee Ponds on UNC
Property
Surface Soil
Radium-226 in SE
—
Subsurface Soil
Radium-226 in SE
--
Arroyos on the Navajo Nation
Surface Soil
Radium-226 in SE
Arsenic
Manganese
Subsurface Soil
Radium-226 in SE
Arsenic
Manganese
Arroyos on UNC Property
Surface Soil
—
—
Subsurface Soil
-
-
Notes:
1 No speciation data are available for chromium; therefore, chromium is assumed to be 100 percent
hexavalent chromium.
No contaminants of concern for the exposure unit based on human health risk assessment results.
CR-1 Quivira Church Rock Mine No. 1
CR-1E Quivira Church Rock Mine No. 1 East
Kerr-McGee Kerr-McGee Corporation
SE Secular equilibrium
UNC United Nuclear Corporation
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
C-18
-------
Appendix C: Quivira Mines Risk Assessment
It
3.4.2 Uncertainty Associated with the Human Health Risk Assessment
Uncertainties are inherent in the process of quantitative risk assessments based on the use of
environmental sampling results, assumptions regarding exposure, and the quantitative
representation of contaminant toxicity. Analysis of the critical areas of uncertainty in a risk
assessment provides a better understanding of the quantitative results through the identification
of the uncertainties that most significantly affect the results.
USEPA (1989) guidance stresses the importance of providing an in-depth analysis of
uncertainties so that risk managers are better informed when evaluating risk assessment
conclusions. Potentially significant sources of uncertainty for this risk assessment are discussed
in the following subsections. The NAUM risk assessment methodology (USEPA 2024b)
provides more general HHRA uncertainty discussions for topics applicable to all NAUM sites.
3.4.2.1 Uncertainty in the Conceptual Site Model
The CSM for the Quivira Mines incorporates several assumptions regarding the completeness
and reasonableness of the exposure scenarios presumed at the site. The primary assumptions
seem evidently valid. Examples include:
• Potential future use of areas for Kee'da'whii teeh (full-time Navajo resident) within
CR-1, CR-1E, the former Kerr-McGee Ponds, and the arroyos on the Navajo Nation —
Many examples of nearby full-time residences on the Navajo Nation are available.
• Potential future use of UNC areas — These areas will remain as industrial use with a
site-specific onsite worker receptor.
• The NAUM Risk Calculator used to calculate the risk-based screening levels incorporates
numerous Navajo-specific exposure pathways. Therefore, any potential to underestimate
total exposure by a Kee'da'whii teeh (full-time Navajo resident) receptor is expected to
be small to moderate.
• Risk-based screening levels for the site-specific UNC outdoor worker were calculated
using standard exposure parameters with a reduced number of days on site per year
(2 days per week for 50 weeks per year for a total of 100 days per year on site). The total
exposure by an onsite worker is expected to be overestimated by this evaluation as any
UNC outdoor worker would be dividing time spent at the multiple UNC sites in the area
and limited maintenance is necessary at the former Kerr-McGee Ponds and portion of the
arroyos on UNC property.
3.4.2.2 Uncertainty in Sample Design and Exposure Point Concentrations
The sampling collection for the site was not based on a random sampling design. Instead,
sampling was biased toward known areas of contamination based on the results of gamma
surveys and X-ray fluorescence samples. Thus, while some areas do not have the same level of
sampling coverage as others, those areas are not likely to have high levels of contamination
based on the site survey techniques employed before collection of discrete samples for laboratory
analysis. The uncertainty associated with the sample collection is moderate, but the samples used
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
C-19
-------
Appendix C: Quivira Mines Risk Assessment
It
in the risk assessment are likely to overestimate the actual site risk because of the biased nature
of the samples collected at the site.
Risks and hazards were calculated using maximum detected concentrations as EPCs for
contaminants with fewer than 10 results for the two arroyo EUs. Use of maximum detected
concentrations as EPCs likely overestimated risks.
3.4.2.3 Uncertainty in Reasonable Maximum Exposure Receptor Selection and
Exposure Parameters
The most significant site-specific uncertainty associated with the HHRA is the selection of the
RME receptor for each EU. EUs used in the NAUM risk assessments and future removal actions
within the TENORM area are developed by identifying areas of TENORM with the same
expected human health receptors. The RME receptor for each EU was selected based on the
criteria provided in the NAUM risk assessment methodology (USEPA 2024b) report and site
knowledge. If the receptor selected is less conservative than the actual future land use, the
HHRA would not be protective. Likewise, if the future land use is less intensive than the receptor
selected (for example, residential is selected, but the actual use is easy access open space), the
HHRA would be overly protective. This uncertainty is moderate, and the direction of the
uncertainty is more likely to be overprotective because of the conservative selection
methodology used to identify the RME receptor for each area.
3.4.2.4 Uncertainty in Use ofHexavalent Chromium Toxicity for Chromium
Hexavalent chromium is not expected to be present in large concentrations at former uranium
mining sites because site operations did not concentrate or use hexavalent chromium. The
assumption of 100 percent hexavalent chromium overestimates the cancer risk from samples
analyzed for total chromium by an unknown amount.
3.4.2.5 Site- Wide Risk Estimates
This HHRA only evaluates the RME receptor at an EU, and the results of the HHRA are used in
making risk management decisions for the site. A potential site uncertainty is that a single
receptor may visit multiple areas at a site and, thus, be exposed to more than one EU.
Kee'da'whii teeh (full-time Navajo resident) was evaluated at three areas; therefore, the risk and
hazards from these areas cannot appropriately be added together as that would assume the
receptor lives on all three sites simultaneously.
However, a resident living at CR-1 may go into the adjacent arroyo (difficult access open space)
to gather plants or hunt. Because of the overlap in the exposure assumptions for plant and animal
ingestion and Other Dine Lifeways (ODL) pathways between the Navajo-specific receptors,
adding the calculated exposures from the receptors at each EU is not possible without counting
the plant, animal, and ODL exposures multiple times. Potential additive scenarios were identified
as follows:
• CR-1 full-time Navajo resident and difficult access open space user of arroyos on the
Navajo Nation
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
C-20
-------
Appendix C: Quivira Mines Risk Assessment
• CR-1E full-time Navajo resident and difficult access open space user of arroyos on the
Navajo Nation
• Former Kerr-McGee Ponds full-time Navajo resident and difficult access open space user
of arroyos on the Navajo Nation
• UNC outdoor worker on former Kerr-McGee Ponds and arroyos on UNC property
To calculate the cumulative risk and hazard that account for possible exposures to different EUs
without double counting the plant, animal, and ODL exposures pathways, a time-weighted
average approach was applied to the combined EUs. However, the actual time a receptor spends
in any area is unknown and introduces a potentially large amount of uncertainty. The following
bullets discuss the potential additive scenarios identified:
• CR-1 full-time Navajo resident and difficult access open space user of arroyos on the
Navajo Nation — The total time on site for this potential scenario would be 99.6 percent
of time spent at CR-1 and 0.4 percent of time in the arroyo. Thus, combining these
scenarios results in a cancer risk and noncancer hazard essentially equal to the full-time
Navajo resident living at CR-1. The cancer risk for surface soil would be 1x10 2, and the
estimated risk for subsurface soil would be 3x10 2. The noncancer hazard would be 10 for
a child and 8 for an adult for both surface and subsurface soil intervals.
• CR-1E full-time Navajo resident and difficult access open space user of arroyos on the
Navajo Nation — The total time on site for this potential scenario would be 99.6 percent
of time spent at CR-1E and 0.4 percent of time in the arroyo. Thus, combining these
scenarios results in a cancer risk and noncancer hazard essentially equal to the full-time
Navajo resident living at CR-1E. The cancer risk for surface soil would be 2x10 2, and the
estimated risk for subsurface soil would be 8x10 2. The noncancer hazard would be 10 for
a child and 8 for an adult for surface soil and 20 for a child and 10 for an adult for
subsurface soil.
• Former Kerr-McGee Ponds full-time Navajo resident and difficult access open space user
of arroyos on the Navajo Nation — The total time on site for this potential scenario
would be 99.6 percent of time spent at the former Kerr-McGee Ponds on the Navajo
Nation and 0.4 percent of time in the arroyo. Thus, combining these scenarios results in a
cancer risk and noncancer hazard essentially equal to the full-time Navajo resident living
at the former Kerr-McGee Ponds. The cancer risk is estimated to be 2x10 2 for both
surface and subsurface soil intervals. The noncancer hazard is 10 for a child and 9 for an
adult for both surface and subsurface soil intervals.
• UNC outdoor worker on former Kerr-McGee Ponds and arroyos on UNC property —
These scenarios do not have overlapping exposures and so the cancer risk and noncancer
hazards can be added from these two areas for an individual worker receptor who is
exposed to both areas. The total risk from both areas is 3x10 4 for surface soil and 2x10 4
for subsurface soil. The total noncancer hazard would be 0.07 for both surface and
subsurface soil intervals.
The actual exposure to any EU at the Quivira Mines is likely overestimated by the scenarios used
to evaluate the EUs. Combining the exposures likely compounds the uncertainty and still
overestimates the exposure and resulting risk and hazard at the site.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
C-21
-------
Appendix C: Quivira Mines Risk Assessment
It
4.0 ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMEN
J
An ERA is the process for evaluating how likely the environment will be impacted as a result of
exposure to one or more environmental stressors, such as radionuclides or chemicals. The
objective of the ERA is to evaluate whether ecological receptors may be adversely affected by
exposure to site-related contaminants. The ERA is intended to provide input for risk management
decision-making at each site while maintaining a conservative approach protective of ecological
populations and communities. This ERA follows the guidelines in the NAUM risk assessment
methodology (USEPA 2024b).
As described in USEPA (1993) EE/CA guidance, a risk assessment is used to help justify a
removal action, identify what current or potential exposures should be prevented, and focus on
the specific problem that the removal action is intended to address. NAUM ERAs include a
screening-level ecological risk assessment (SLERA) and SLERA refinement. The SLERA
includes Steps 1 and 2 of USEPA's eight-step ERA process (USEPA 1997) and is intended to
provide a conservative estimate using maximum site concentrations of potential ecological risks
and compensate for uncertainty in a precautionary manner by incorporating conservative
assumptions. The SLERA refinement includes a refinement of Steps 1 and 2 and is intended to
provide additional information for risk managers. Candidate COECs are identified based on the
results of the SLERA refinement for soil. Table C-2 and Table C-8 through Table C-12 present
data and analysis associated with the ERA.
Consistent with standard risk assessment practice and USEPA (1992b, 1998, 2022a) guidance,
the ERA is presented in three major phases:
• Problem formulation
• Analysis of exposure and effects
• Risk characterization
4.1 PROBLEM FORMULATION
The problem formulation phase is a planning and scoping process that establishes the goals,
breadth, and focus of the risk assessment. The product of the problem formation is a CSM that
identifies the environmental values to be protected (assessment endpoints), data needed, and
analyses to be used. The components of the problem formulation include:
• Ecological habitat and biological resources
• Stressors and COI selection
• Potentially complete exposure pathways
• Assessment endpoints
• Measurement endpoints
• Ecological CSM
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
C-22
-------
Appendix C: Quivira Mines Risk Assessment
It
The SLERA includes the screening-level problem formulation (Step 1), exposure estimation,
effects evaluation, and screening-level risk calculation (Step 2) of the USEPA risk assessment
process. The maximum detected concentration across the site is used as the EPC in the SLERA,
which is compared with the minimum no observed effect concentration (NOEC) for all
ecological receptors. The product of the SLERA is a list of contaminants of potential ecological
concern (COPEC) in affected media that are recommended for further ecological assessment.
The SLERA refinement provides additional information for risk managers. For plants and
invertebrates, the SLERA refinement includes a point-by-point comparison of individual sample
results to plant and invertebrate NOECs. For free-ranging birds and mammals, the SLERA
refinement uses an estimate of the average concentration as the EPC to represent exposure to
free-ranging birds and mammals and includes a comparison of the EPC with the minimum
NOEC for birds and mammals.
At the conclusion of the SLERA refinement, the candidate COECs are identified. For plants and
invertebrates, analytes with any individual sample results exceeding the plant and invertebrate
NOEC will be identified as candidate COECs, and for birds and mammals, analytes with a
refined hazard quotient (HQ) equal to or greater than 1.0 will be identified as candidate COECs.
These analytes are called candidate COECs (rather than COECs) because the analytes have not
yet undergone a background evaluation, which will be completed in the EE/CA. The background
evaluation should not be performed as part of the risk assessment.
4.1.1 Ecological Habitat and Biological Resources
The ecological habitat and biological resources at the Quivira Mines are described in Section 1.4.
The Quivira Mines are primarily within an Area 3 wildlife sensitive area.
4.1.2 Stressors and Contaminants of Potential Ecological Concern Selection
All detected inorganic chemicals and radionuclides in soil were considered COIs in this SLERA.
Essential nutrients that are not priority pollutants, such as calcium, magnesium, potassium, and
sodium, were not retained as COIs. No speciation data are available for chromium; therefore,
chromium is assumed to be 100 percent hexavalent chromium. See Section 2.4 of the main
EE/CA report for further discussion on the sources and extent of contamination. Samples
collected within soil (0 to 72 inches bgs) were used in the risk assessment as described in
Section 2.1.
4.1.3 Potentially Complete Exposure Pathways
A contaminant must be able to travel from the source to the representative receptor and must be
taken up by the receptor through one or more exposure routes for an exposure pathway to be
considered complete. Complete exposure pathways present the greatest potential risk of adverse
effects for receptors of concern at a site. Potential exposure pathways that may result in receptor
contact with contaminants in the environment include soils, sediment, surface water,
groundwater, air, and food-chain transfer. Soil and sediment are the primary exposure media of
concern at this site. Potential exposure pathways are diagrammed in the CSM (Figure C-10).
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
C-23
-------
Appendix C: Quivira Mines Risk Assessment
It
Discussion of the exposure pathways for ecological receptors at NAUM sites is provided in the
NAUM risk assessment methodology (USEPA 2024b).
Soil exposures are evaluated in the SLERA for the Quivira Mines. The removal actions at the
Quivira Mines are focused on removing waste and soil as the removal of both should remove the
source of contamination to surface water and groundwater. Exposure to surface water or
groundwater is assumed to be minimal because the presence of surface water at the Quivira
Mines is intermittent and groundwater is too deep for ecological receptors to access.
4.1.4 Assessment Endpoints
USEPA (1997) defines assessment endpoints as explicit expressions of the actual environmental
values (for example, ecological resources) that are to be protected. Assessment endpoints are
environmental characteristics that, if impaired, would indicate a need for action by risk
managers.
The assessment endpoints identified for evaluation in the ERA were based on the ecological
habitat, stressors and COPECs, and potentially complete exposure pathways identified in
Section 4.1.3 and depicted on the CSM (Figure C-10). Each assessment endpoint is intended to
protect the local populations of the identified resources. The assessment endpoints used to
evaluate the potential ecological risk to receptors typical of the area at the Quivira Mines were:
• Protection of terrestrial plants
• Protection of terrestrial invertebrates
• Protection of herbivorous birds
• Protection of insectivorous birds
• Protection of carnivorous birds
• Protection of herbivorous mammals
• Protection of insectivorous mammals
• Protection of carnivorous mammals
4.1.5 Measurement Endpoints
Measurement endpoints related to the assessment endpoints were identified because assessment
endpoints are usually not amenable to direct measurement. USEPA (1997) defines a
measurement endpoint as a measurable ecological characteristic that is related to the valued
characteristic chosen as the assessment endpoint and is a measure of biological effects (such as
mortality, reproduction, or growth). Measurement endpoints for soil and sediment for both
radionuclides and metals are described below.
For radionuclides in soil, ecological screening levels (ESL) for the NAUM program were
developed by Tetra Tech (see Appendix F of the NAUM risk assessment methodology [USEPA
2024b] report). An ecological radiation dose assessment was performed for radionuclides in the
uranium-238 decay chain using the dose assessment model Environmental Risks from Ionizing
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
C-24
-------
Appendix C: Quivira Mines Risk Assessment
It
Contaminants: Assessment and Management (ERICA). The ERICA model is scientifically
robust, follows approaches recommended by the International Commission on Radiation
Protection for radiation protection of the environment, and provides dose assessment for
uranium-238 and all its decay progeny. Using the ERICA Tool (Brown and others 2008; Larsson
2008), ESLs were calculated for the following radionuclides or groups of radionuclides in soil
for terrestrial organisms:
• Uranium-238 in SE (adjusted radium-226) adjusted to account for the entire uranium-238
decay chain
• Radium-226 in SE (adjusted radium-226) adjusted to account for radium-226 and decay
products
• Individual radionuclides uranium-238, uranium-234, and thorium-230
ESLs are based on dose rates where no effects have been observed and, therefore, are NOECs.
For all radionuclides, the limiting ESLs are for lichen-biyophytes and small burrowing animals
at 4 and 6 picocuries per gram, respectively. The ESLs are designed for use for comparison with
radium-226 site concentrations. Use of site data for radium-226 reduces the number of analytical
methods needed to evaluate risks from radionuclides. Furthermore, radium-226 concentrations
can be correlated to gamma survey results, which provides an efficient and reliable way to
evaluate the extent of radiation contamination.
For metals for soil, USEPA (2023a) ecological soil screening levels (Eco-SSL) are used as the
primary source for NOEC levels. Eco-SSLs are available for the protection of terrestrial plants,
invertebrates, birds, and mammals from the three primary feeding groups (herbivores,
insectivores, and carnivores). The Eco-SSLs for soil-dwelling invertebrates and plants are based
on direct contact with soil by plants and soil-dwelling organisms living in impacted soil. The
Eco-SSLs for upper-trophic-level wildlife are based on incidental ingestion of soil and ingestion
of food sources that have bioaccumulated contaminants. The no effect Eco-SSL is based on a
no-observed-adverse-effect-level-based toxicity reference value that is protective of wildlife
populations and sensitive individuals because it represents an exposure that is not associated with
an adverse effect. The Eco-SSLs are intended to be conservative screening values that can be
used to eliminate contaminants not associated with unacceptable risks (USEPA 2005).
Where a USEPA Eco-SSL is not available for a COPEC and receptor combination (for example,
total mercury, thallium, and uranium), a no-observed-adverse-effect-level-based toxicity value
from the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) EcoRisk database (Newport News Nuclear
BWXT-Los Alamos, LLC [N3B] 2022) is selected as the screening level. The LANL EcoRisk
database includes ESLs for plant, invertebrate, avian, and mammalian receptors. Soil
invertebrate and plant screening levels were also taken from the Oak Ridge National Laboratory
(ORNL) (Efroymson, Will, and Suter II 1997; Efroymson, Will, Suter II, and Wooten 1997) if a
screening level was not available as an Eco-SSL or from the LANL EcoRisk database. No
Eco-SSL or LANL values for mammals were available for molybdenum; therefore, screening
values were taken from ORNL's "Preliminary Remediation Goals for Ecological Endpoints"
(Efroymson, Suter II, Sample, and Jones 1997).
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
C-25
-------
Appendix C: Quivira Mines Risk Assessment
It
The screening levels selected from USEPA Eco-SSLs (USEPA 2023a), LANL ESLs (N3B
2022), and ORNL (Efroymson, Will, and Suter II 1997; Efroymson, Will, Suter II, and Wooten
1997) for metals and developed from ERICA (for radionuclides) for use in the SLERA screening
are the lowest NOECs for all receptor groups (that is, the lowest of the plant, invertebrate, bird
[herbivorous, insectivorous, and carnivorous], and mammal [herbivorous, insectivorous, and
carnivorous] NOECs) for each COPEC. The screening levels are provided in Table C-8.
4.1.6 Conceptual Site Model
The CSM illustrates exposure pathways to be evaluated in the ERA and provides other key
information such as contaminant sources, release and transport mechanisms, and the relative
importance of exposure pathways to specific receptor groups. The CSM incorporates all
components of the problem formulation as discussed above and illustrated on Figure C-10.
4.2 ANALYSIS OF EXPOSURE AND EFFECTS
In the analysis phase, exposure to stressors (metals and radionuclides) and their relationship to
ecological effects are evaluated. A determination is made of (1) the degree to which ecological
receptors are exposed and (2) whether that level of exposure is likely to cause harmful
ecological effects.
4.2.1 Exposure Estimates
For the SLERA, a single site-wide exposure area that included all data collected within the
Quivira Mines EUs were used for the evaluation of potential risk to ecological receptors.
Exposure estimates for the SLERA for soil are the maximum detected concentrations for COIs in
soil compared to the minimum screening levels for all receptors (plants, invertebrates, birds
[herbivorous, insectivorous, and carnivorous], and mammals [herbivorous, insectivorous, and
carnivorous]). For each detected analyte, the maximum detected concentrations used in the
SLERA for each COPEC are presented in Table C-8.
Following the comparison of the maximum detection to the NOEC, a SLERA refinement of
exposure was completed by assessing site data within surface and subsurface soils and using the
UCL95 (for analytes where sufficient data were available) instead of the maximum concentration
to evaluate risk to free-ranging receptors (birds and mammals) for the assessment of wildlife.
Surface and subsurface soils include depth intervals of 0 to 6 inches bgs for surface soil and 0 to
72 inches bgs for subsurface soil (see Section 2.1). The EPCs used in the SLERA refinement for
birds and mammals for each COPEC were calculated per the procedure in Section 2.4 and are
presented in Table C-9. For the SLERA refinement for plants and invertebrates, individual
sample concentrations are used in a point-by-point comparison.
4.2.2 Ecological Effects
Ecological effects of potential concern are those that can impact populations by causing adverse
effects on development, reproduction, and survival (USEPA 1997). Literature-based effects
concentrations (NOECs) as described in Section 4.1.5 were used in the ERA to characterize
potential effects from direct contact and uptake through the food web to terrestrial ecological
receptors, including vegetation, soil invertebrates, birds, and mammals.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
C-26
-------
Appendix C: Quivira Mines Risk Assessment
It
For the SLERA, an HQ was calculated as the ratio of the maximum contaminant concentration to
the screening level (NOEC) by COPEC and receptor. HQs greater than or equal to 1.0 indicate
potential unacceptable risk to plants, invertebrates, birds, and mammals based on a conservative
comparison of the maximum detected concentration to the minimum NOEC-based screening
level for all receptors. HQs less than 1.0 indicate little to no potential ecological risk for a given
COPEC, and the COPEC is excluded from further consideration (that is, the COPEC was not
evaluated in the SLERA refinement). The SLERA HQ was calculated as follows:
Maximum Detected Concentration
SLERA HQ =
Screening Level (NOEC or ESL)
To better understand potential risk to free-ranging receptors, the site-wide EPC (based on the
lesser of the UCL95 and maximum detected concentration) will be used as a refinement in the
SLERA refinement using NOECs based on birds and mammals. The refined SLERA HQ is
calculated as follows:
EPC
Refined SLERA HQ =
Screening Level (NOEC or ESL)
Because plant and soil invertebrates are not mobile, concentration data from each sample
location should be compared to the plant and invertebrate NOEC-based screening levels in a
separate table.
4.3 RISK CHARACTERIZATION
In the risk characterization phase, potential risk is estimated through integration of exposure and
effects, potential risks are considered in the context of uncertainties associated with the SLERA,
and risk descriptions are provided.
4.3.1 Screening-Level Ecological Risk Assessment for Contaminants of Potential
Ecological Concern
HQs, which represent the ratio of the maximum detected concentration in soil to the screening
levels, are presented in Table C-8. Contaminants for which the HQ was greater than or equal to
1.0 were uranium-238, uranium-234, radium-226, arsenic, barium, chromium, lead, manganese,
nickel, selenium, thallium, uranium, vanadium, and zinc.
4.3.2 Screening-Level Ecological Risk Assessment Refinement
The SLERA refinement incorporates components of Step 3 of USEPA's eight-step ERA process
to refine the soil risk estimates from the SLERA (USEPA 2000b, 2001). The SLERA refinement
involves assessing plants and invertebrates on a point-by-point basis and wildlife (birds and
mammals) based on a refined EPC.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
C-27
-------
Appendix C: Quivira Mines Risk Assessment
4.3.2.1 Plants and Soil Invertebrates
Plants and soil invertebrates are not mobile; therefore, comparison of the UCL95 to the NOEC
or ESL may not appropriately assess whether potential unacceptable risk to plants and
invertebrates exists. Therefore, a comparison on a point-by-point basis using the plant and
invertebrate NOECs is required. COPECs are identified as candidate COECs if at least one
sample result exceeds the plant or soil invertebrate NOEC or ESL for surface soil or the plant
NOEC or ESL for subsurface soil. Table C-10 presents a comparison of individual surface soil
sample results to NOECs or ESLs for the plant and invertebrate communities and of individual
subsurface soil sample results to NOECs or ESL for the plant communities (invertebrates are not
exposed to soil at depths greater than 6 inches bgs). For plants and invertebrates, analytes with
any individual sample results exceeding the plant and invertebrate NOEC or ESL are identified
as candidate COECs.
Candidate COECs for plants were uranium-238 (subsurface only), uranium-234 (subsurface
only), radium-226 in SE, arsenic (surface only), barium, chromium, lead (surface only),
manganese, selenium, thallium, and uranium. Candidate COECs for invertebrates were arsenic,
barium, chromium, and selenium.
4.3.2.2 Birds and Mammals
For free-ranging wildlife, the EPCs are calculated on a site-wide basis for contaminants with
analyte-specific HQs that are equal to or greater than 1.0 in the SLERA. SLERA refinement risk
estimates are calculated by dividing EPCs by the minimum NOEC or ESL for birds and
mammals for each COPEC in surface soil and by dividing EPCs by the NOEC or ESL for
mammals in subsurface soil (birds and non-burrowing mammals are not exposed to soil at depths
greater than 6 inches bgs).
Table C-l 1 and Table C-12 present HQs for birds and mammals, respectively. Candidate
COECs for birds and mammals are identified for analytes with HQs greater than 1.0 based on
the comparison of the EPC (UCL95) to the minimum screening level (minimum NOEC or ESL
for wildlife).
Candidate COECs for birds were lead, selenium, vanadium, and zinc. Candidate COECs for
mammals were radium-226 in SE (subsurface soil only) and selenium.
4.3.3 Candidate Contaminants of Ecological Concern
Candidate COECs were identified based on available laboratory and toxicological data for the
Quivira Mines. The SLERA results indicate that risk is above a level of concern for the
contaminants listed in Exhibit C-4.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
C-28
-------
Appendix C: Quivira Mines Risk Assessment
It
Exhibit C-4. Site-Wide Candidate COECs
Candidate COEC
LD
-------
Appendix C: Quivira Mines Risk Assessment
It
soils at the Quivira Mines was assumed to represent the entire site to ensure protectiveness.
However, this method creates bias in the data toward the more disturbed or affected
environments at the site and is likely to overestimate COPEC exposure concentrations.
Similarly, in the SLERA refinement, an EPC for each COPEC for surface and subsurface soils
was used to estimate exposures and ensure protectiveness. The use of the UCL95 concentration
may under- or overestimate COPEC concentrations used to characterize conditions throughout
the site, depending on their actual site-wide distribution. In addition, portions of the site are bare
ground and do not provide habitat or foraging area for some ecological receptors. Bare ground
areas are included in the evaluation; however, the nature of the bare ground areas (toxicity, lack
of soil, etc.) is unknown.
Site-specific bulk chemistry concentrations were compared with toxicity benchmarks values such
as USEPA Eco-SSLs and LANL ESLs as an indicator of the potential for adverse effects. Bulk
chemistry results for onsite samples likely overestimate the bioavailable fraction of each COPEC
as the results do not consider whether the contaminant is bound to soil particles or other
compounds that could prevent uptake by plants and invertebrates, or absorption upon direct
contact or ingestion by higher trophic-level receptors.
The ERA assumes that all receptors live and forage solely at the site; however, this assumption is
not necessarily true for the avian and larger mammalian receptors, which can forage over larger
areas and are not likely to be consistently exposed to COPECs in soil at the estimated site
concentrations. Mobile ecological receptors could be exposed to areas beyond the site boundary
depending on the foraging and home range of the particular species. The use of media-based
screening levels does not account for the size of the site or the foraging area. Nonmobile
receptors, such as the plant and soil invertebrate communities, are assessed by sample, and small
ranging receptors, such as small mammals, would likely remain within the site boundaries if
sufficient food and shelter were available. However, free-ranging wildlife, such as raptors, large
herbivores, and top-level predators, would travel beyond the site boundary. Furthermore, use of a
site can vary seasonally. Therefore, the actual amount of soil or prey ingested from the site
would likely be less than the values used in the risk calculations, resulting in an overestimate of
risk. The impact of this uncertainty is species dependent but likely small given that those
receptors that would travel beyond the site boundary have large home ranges.
As with any site investigation, uncertainty will be associated with the representativeness of the
samples both spatially and temporally. Soil samples were collected from over a period of
12 years by multiple contractors, and sampling methods and analytical methods may not have
been consistent. Figure C-3 through Figure C-9 show the sample locations for each EU. Spatial
variability is limited because soil samples used in the risk assessment were all collected within
the disturbed area of the mines and the Kerr-McGee Ponds. Temporal variability is limited
because soil sampling methods were consistent among sampling events and because of the
known environmental fate of the COPECs (lack of degradation).
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
C-30
-------
Appendix C: Quivira Mines Risk Assessment
4.4.2 Nondetected Contaminants of Potential Ecological Concern
Little uncertainty is involved with the analytical analysis for soil at the Quivira Mines as all
COPECs were detected in soil above their respective detection limits in at least some samples.
4.4.3 Combined Exposures Across Media and Exposure Units
The design of the ecological screening process and use of media-based screening levels assumes
isolation of exposure (for example, risk from exposure to soil is not added to the risk from
exposure to surface water). Because surface water is present irregularly in the arroyos, an aquatic
community would unlikely become established; however, birds, mammals, and reptiles could
ingest the water when it is available. The risk analysis does not account for exposure to COPECs
in drinking water, but the magnitude of this uncertainty is unknown.
4.4.4 Risk to Plant and Invertebrate Communities
To address the potential risk to plant and invertebrate communities, concentration data from each
sample are compared to the conservative screening values protective of individual plants and
invertebrates. Table C-10 presents this analysis so that risk managers can evaluate the potential
risk to these communities by sample location.
Aluminum and iron do not have screening values for either community. The magnitude of the
impacts of aluminum and iron on nonmobile communities is unknown. Six additional COPECs
at the Quivira Mines (cobalt, molybdenum, silver, thallium, uranium, and vanadium) do not have
soil invertebrate screening values. The magnitude of the impacts of these metals on the soil
invertebrate community is unknown.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
C-31
-------
Appendix C: Quivira Mines Risk Assessment
5.0 RISK ASSESSMENT RESULTS SUMMAR
J
The HHRA and SLERA results indicate human health and ecological risk exceed the acceptable
risk levels. Candidate COCs and COECs were identified based on available laboratory and
toxicological data at the CR-1, CR-1E, Kerr-McGee Ponds on the Navajo Nation, Kerr-McGee
Ponds on UNC property, and arroyos on the Navajo Nation EUs. No candidate COCs or COECs
were identified for the arroyos on UNC property EU. The HHRA and ERA results indicate that
risk is above a level of concern for the contaminants listed in Exhibit C-5.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
C-32
-------
Appendix C: Quivira Mines Risk Assessment
"It
Exhibit C-5. Candidate Contaminants of Concern or Contaminants of Ecological Concern for Soil
Candidate COC or COEC
Exposure Unit
Soil Interval
CO
CM
¦
E
3
'E
TO
D
00
PO
CM
¦
E
3
'E
<0
L.
Z)
Radium-226 in SE
Arsenic
Barium
Chromium2
Cobalt
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Selenium
Thallium
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
CR-1
Surface and
Subsurface Soils
-
-
X
X
-
X
X
X
-
X
-
X
X
-
-
CR-1 E
Surface and
Subsurface Soils
-
-
X
X
-
X
X
X
-
X
-
X
X
-
-
Kerr-McGee Ponds
on the Navajo Nation
Surface and
Subsurface Soils
-
-
X
X
-
X
X
X
-
X
-
X
X
-
-
Kerr-McGee Ponds
on UNC Property
Surface and
Subsurface Soils
-
-
X
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Arroyos on the
Navajo Nation
Surface and
Subsurface Soils
-
-
X
X
-
-
-
-
-
X
-
-
-
-
-
Arroyos on UNC
Property
Surface and
Subsurface Soils
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Site-Wide
Surface Soil
-
-
X
X
X
X
-
-
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
(Ecological)
Subsurface Soil
X
X
X
-
X
X
-
-
-
X
X
X
X
-
-
Notes:
X
COC
COEC
CR-1
CR-1E
EE/CA
Uranium-234 and uranium-238 concentrations exceed the ecological no observed effects concentration for plants in a single subsurface sample
(location KMP-SB28 from 60 to 66 inches below ground surface) in the Kerr-McGee Ponds on UNC Property EU. This area is considered a hot
spot, and any recommendations for uranium-234 and uranium-238 apply only to this hot spot.
No speciation data are available for chromium; therefore, chromium is assumed to be 100 percent hexavalent chromium.
Not a candidate COC or COEC. Not recommended for further evaluation in the EE/CA.
Candidate COC and/or COEC. Recommended for further evaluation in the EE/CA.
Contaminant of concern
Contaminant of ecological concern
Quivira Church Rock Mine No. 1
Quivira Church Rock Mine No. 1 East
Engineering evaluation/cost analysis
EPC Exposure point concentration
Kerr-McGee Kerr-McGee Corporation
mg/kg Milligram per kilogram
SE Secular equilibrium
UNC United Nuclear Corporation
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
C-33
-------
Appendix C: Quivira Mines Risk Assessment
6.0 REFERENC
J
Brown, J.E., B. Alfonso, R. Avila, N.A. Beresford, D. Copplestone, G. PrOhl, and A. Ulanovsky.
2008. "The ERICA Tool." Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. Volume 99, Issue 9.
Pages 1371 through 1383.
Efroymson, R.A., M.E. Will, and G.W. Suter II. 1997. "Toxicological Benchmarks for
Contaminants of Potential Concern for Effects on Soil and Litter Invertebrates and
Heterotrophic Process." ES/ER/TM-126/R2. Oak Ridge National Laboratories, Oak
Ridge, TN.
Efroymson, R.A., M.E. Will, G.W. Suter II, and A.C. Wooten. 1997. "Toxicological
Benchmarks for Screening Contaminants of Potential Concern for Effects on Terrestrial
Plants." ES/ER/TM-85/R3. Oak Ridge National Laboratories, Oak Ridge, TN.
Larsson, C.M. 2008. "An Overview of the ERICA Integrated Approach to the Assessment and
Management of Environmental Risks from Ionising Contaminants." Journal of
Environmental Radioactivity. Volume 99, Issue 9. Pages 1364 through 1370.
Los Alamos National Laboratory. 2015. "Screening-Level Ecological Risk Assessment
Methods." Revision 4. EP2015-0174. October 29.
Navajo Nation Department of Fish and Wildlife (NNDFW). 2022. "Biological Resource Land-
Use Clearance Policies and Procedures." https://nndfw.org/zones/rcp.html.
Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency. 2021. "Navajo Tribe Provisional Reasonable
Maximum Exposures for the Navajo Risk Assessments." Draft. September 15.
Newport News Nuclear BWXT-Los Alamos, LLC (N3B). 2022. "ECORISK Database."
Release 4.3. 701067. Document EM2020-0575. Los Alamos National Laboratory.
September.
Red Water Pond Road Community Association and Southwest Research and Information Center.
2012. "History through Pictures Past and Present of the Red House People." Revised
September.
SENES Consultants Limited. 2011. "Interim Removal Action, Final Removal Site Evaluation
Report for Northeast Church Rock - Quivira Site Evaluation for Church Rock (CR-1)
and (CR-1E) Mine Sites." September.
Tetra Tech, Inc. (Tetra Tech). 2022a. "Quivira Mines and Kerr-McGee Ponds Biological
Assessment." Response, Assessment, and Evaluation Services. Contract No. EP-S9-17-
03.
Tetra Tech. 2022b. "Technical Memorandum, Biological Survey Report, Quivira Mines and
Kerr-McGee Ponds, Eastern Abandoned Uranium Mine Region." Prepared for the Navajo
Nation Department of Fish and Game. June 3.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
C-34
-------
Appendix C: Quivira Mines Risk Assessment
It
Tetra Tech. 2023. "Quivira Mines Data Gaps Investigation Transmittal Memorandum."
Response, Assessment, and Evaluation Services. Contract No. EP-S9-17-03. September.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 1989. "Risk Assessment Guidance for
Superfund Volume I - Human Health Evaluation Manual, Part A." EPA/540/1-89/002.
USEPA. 1992a. "Framework for Ecological Risk Assessment. Risk Assessment Forum."
EPA/630/R- 92/001. February.
USEPA. 1992b. "Guidance for Data Useability in Risk Assessment (Part A)." Office of Solid
Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER). Publication 9285.7-09A. April.
USEPA. 1992c. "Supplemental Guidance to [Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund] RAGS:
Calculating the Concentration Term." Intermittent Bulletin, Volume 1, No. 1. Publication
9285.7-081. May.
USEPA. 1993. "Guidance on Conducting Non-Time-Critical Removal Actions Under
CERCLA." OSWER 9360.0-32. August.
USEPA. 1997. "ERA Guidance for Superfund: Process for Designing and Conducting ERAs."
Interim Final. EPA/540/R-97/006. June.
USEPA. 1998. "Guidelines for Ecological Assessment." Office of Research and Development.
EPA/630/R-5/002FA. April.
USEPA. 2000a. "Guidance for Data Quality Assessment: Practical Methods for Data Analysis:
USEPA QA/G-9, QA97 Version." USEPA/600/R-96/084. Office of Research and
Development. July.
USEPA. 2000b. "Amended Guidance on Ecological Risk Assessment at Military Bases: Process
Considerations, Timing of Activities, and Inclusion of Stakeholders." Memorandum from
Ted W. Simon, Ph.D., Office of Technical Services. June 23.
USEPA. 2001. "The Role of Screening-Level Risk Assessments and Refining Contaminants of
Concern in Baseline Ecological Risk Assessments." OSWER. EPA 540/F-01/014. June.
USEPA. 2002. "Calculating Exposure Point Concentrations at Hazardous Waste Sites."
OSWER. Directive 9285.6-10. December.
USEPA. 2003. "Human Health Toxicity Values in Superfund Risk Assessments." OSWER
Directive 9285.7-53. December 5.
USEPA. 2004. Multi-Agency Radiological Laboratory Analytical Protocols Manual. NUREG-
1576/EPA 402-B-04-001A/NTIS PB2004-105421. July.
USEPA. 2005. "Guidance for Developing Ecological Soil Screening Levels." February.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
C-35
-------
Appendix C: Quivira Mines Risk Assessment
It
USEPA. 2020. "National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Superfund Methods Data Review."
Office of Land and Emergency Management 9240.0-66/EPA 540-R-20-006. November.
USEPA. 2022a. "EPA EcoBox (A Toolbox for Ecological Risk Assessors)." Accessed May.
https://www.epa.gov/ecobox.
USEPA. 2022b. "ProUCL Version 5.2.0 Statistical Software for Environmental Applications for
Data Sets with and without Nondetect Observations." June 14.
USEPA. 2023a. "Interim Ecological Soil Screening Level Documents." Accessed July 20.
https://www.epa.gov/chemical-research/interim-ecological-soil-screening-level-
documents.
USEPA. 2023b. "Preliminary Remediation Goals for Radionuclides (PRG)." September.
https://epa-prgs.ornl.gov/cgi-bin/radionuclides/rprg_search.
USEPA. 2023c. "Regional Screening Levels (RSLs)." November, https://epa-prgs.ornl.gov/cgi-
bin / chemicals/csl_search.
USEPA. 2024a. "Updated Residential Soil Lead Guidance for CERCLA Sites and RCRA
Corrective Action Facilities." Office of Land and Emergency Management. January 17.
USEPA. 2024b. "Navajo Abandoned Uranium Mine Risk Assessment Methodology." Draft
Final. March.
USEPA. 2024c. "Navajo Abandoned Uranium Mine Risk Calculator." Version 1.03. March.
Weston Solution, Inc. (Weston). 2010. "Expanded Site Screening, North East Church Rock -
Quivira Mines, Navajo Nation, New Mexico." April.
Contract No. 68HE0923D0002, Task Order 001
C-36
-------
FIGURES
-------
.6
BBIHI
¦#
• a®
« ¦
QU V RATRONOX M NES
Farmington
Quivira
Tronox
Mines
FJagsti ft
Red Water Pond Road
Qu v ra Vent
H° 0 2
STANDING ROCK CHAPTER
KerrMcGee PINEDALE CHAPTER
Ponds Area
Defiance
CHURCH ROCK
chapter*
UN TED NUCLEAR
CORPORAT ON PROPERTY
Gallup
COYOTE CANYON CHAPTER
Notes:
CR-1
Quivira Tronox Church Rock No.
1 Mine Site
CR-1E
Quivira Tronox Church Rock No.
1 East Mine Site
Kerr-McGee
Kerr-McGee Corporation
Legend
Drainage
Road
Navajo Nation Chapter Boundary
Navajo Nation Regions
Former Vent Hole Closed by Removal Action Central Region
Kerr-McGee Ponds Investigation Boundary Eastern Region
Quivira Tronox Mine Lease Area North Central Region
f II 100-Foot Step-Out Boundary Northern Region
United Nuclear Corporation Property Southern Region
I i Navajo Nation Boundary Western Region
Prepared for: U.S. EPA Region 9
Prepared By:
i Feet
2,000
4,000
TETRATECH
MINE LOCATION
Task Order No.:
0001
Location:
QUIVIRA TRONOX MINES
Window Rock
Detail Area
Contract No.:
68HE0923D0002
Date:
3/8/2024
Figure No
C-1
-------
^ wdroM. *;•¦ ^
_fV* |n r*? \ *_ •' X
v^fif.ft;
J*££
"fc4 ^SSfeSS^Ssf-\> '
'"j'SSVaWF^ • • -•»• ^^ , f
Quivira Tronox Church
Rock No. 1 Mine Site (CR-1)
'• V/. r • a*"
k> J07 TIHiW' : - «t ^
<**£:¦.'---.irK ,J^di
'\>£:..-f~'.-;'' :-•
Sfc* * vSiTsJ"». >.1 * -¦C^MS&itf
':»* •- r49K^
I: \Kr •&»
-v^fi
a? i »v4P
srv^i f
Km*
¦1/
#?fi 'Ma
"J* gK aCr, K
j4«.«V- * ' •
© '
wwl
( • - m +~ .
*r >•
|jn|i|
Jr£
itf
- >*^ R •; v
*>>% •Tlr ^Fifc It -i-.vEsl •>'
^FTfcvk' >•*
i^r
a
hln
Surface Soil Sample (0-6 inches bgs)
~ (includes all lab samples with
bottom depth < 6 inches bgs)
Subsurface Soil Sample (below 6 inches bgs)
~ (includes all lab samples with bottom
depth > 6 inches and < 72 inches bgs)
Exposure Units1,2
Church Rock Mine No. 1
Church Rock Mine No. 1 East
Kerr-McGee Ponds on the
Navajo Nation
Kerr-McGee Ponds on United
Nuclear Corporation Property
Arroyos on Navajo Nation
Arroyos on United Nuclear
Corporation Property
Site-Wide (for Ecological Risk)
1 inch - 600 feet
1:7,200
600 300 0
EXPOSURE UNITS AND
SAMPLE LOCATIONS
ED
Prepared For: U.S. EPA Region 9
41
^ MKf-
1/
* i»k' -^K
,w
> yM r
SaaPI
\^§k)
Kerr-McGee Ponds Area
¦ Prepared By:
TETRATECH
Wxjm
Twf;
Task Order No.:
000 1
Arroyos on United Nuclear
Corporation Property
United Nuclear Corporation Outdoor
Worker
Site-Wide
Ecological Receptors
( 1
IT.
rzl
Notes:
'Exposure unit boundaries are based on TENORM
determination for each area.
2Ecological risk is evaluated on a site-wide basis,
bgs Below ground surface
Kerr-McGee Kerr-McGee Corporation
Location:
QUIVIRA TRONOX MINES
Contract No.:
68HE0923D0002
3/8/2024
Coordinate System:
NAD 1983 State Plane New Mexico West
FIPS 3003 Feet Transverse Mercator
Figure No.:
C-2
-------
Soil Sample Locations
Surface Soil Sample (0-6 inches bgs)
A (includes all lab samples with
bottom depth < 6 inches bgs)
_ Subsurface Soil Sample (below 6 inches bgs)
|_| (includes all lab samples with bottom
depth > 6 inches and < 72 inches bgs)
I I Mine Lease Boundary
Kerr-McGee Ponds
Investigation Boundary
I I Kerr-McGee Ponds Fenceline
Exposure Units
Church Rock Mine No. 1
Arroyos on Navajo Nation
Site-Wide (for Ecological Risk)
1 inch = 150 feet
1:1,800
150 75 0
N
S
150
I Feet
QUIVIRA CHURCH ROCK NO. 1
MINE EXPOSURE UNIT WITH
SAMPLE LOCATIONS - WEST SIDE
Prepared For: U.S. EPA Region 9
(0/
*>4
Prepared By:
Notes:
Church Rock Mine No. 1 was evaluated in the risk
assessment as a single exposure unit. Two figures
of the sample locations were necessary to provide
legible sample identification labels,
bgs Below ground surface
CR-1 Quivira Church Rock No. 1 Mine
CR-1E Quivira Church Rock No. 1 East
Mine
EU Exposure unit
Kerr-McGee Kerr-McGee Corporation
TETRATECH
Task Order No.:
000 1
QUIVIRA MINES
Contract No.:
68HE0923D0002
3/8/2024
Coordinate System:
NAD 1983 State Plane New Mexico West
FIPS 3003 Feet Transverse Mercator
Figure No.:
C-3
-------
Soil Sample Locations
Surface Soil Sample (0-6 inches bgs)
A (includes all lab samples with
bottom depth < 6 inches bgs)
_ Subsurface Soil Sample (below 6 inches bgs)
|_| (includes all lab samples with bottom
depth > 6 inches and < 72 inches bgs)
I I Mine Lease Boundary
Kerr-McGee Ponds
Investigation Boundary
I I Kerr-McGee Ponds Fenceline
Exposure Units
Church Rock Mine No. 1
Arroyos on Navajo Nation
Site-Wide (for Ecological Risk)
1 inch = 180 feet
1:2,160
180 90 0
N
W E
S
180
I Feet
QUIVIRA CHURCH ROCK NO. 1
MINE EXPOSURE UNIT WITH
SAMPLE LOCATIONS - EAST SIDE
Prepared For: U.S. EPA Region 9
Prepared By:
Notes:
Church Rock Mine No. 1 was evaluated in the risk
assessment as a single exposure unit. Two figures
of the sample locations were necessary to provide
legible sample identification labels,
bgs Below ground surface
CR-1 Quivira Church Rock No. 1 Mine
CR-1E Quivira Church Rock No. 1 East
Mine
EU Exposure unit
Kerr-McGee Kerr-McGee Corporation
TETRATECH
Task Order No.:
000 1
QUIVIRA MINES
Contract No.:
68HE0923D0002
3/8/2024
Coordinate System:
NAD 1983 State Plane New Mexico West
FIPS 3003 Feet Transverse Mercator
Figure No.:
C-4
-------
Soil Sample Locations
A
Surface Soil Sample (0-6 inches bgs)
(includes all lab samples with
bottom depth < 6 inches bgs)
_ Subsurface Soil Sample (below 6 inches bgs)
|_| (includes all lab samples with bottom
depth > 6 inches and < 72 inches bgs)
I I Mine Lease Boundary
Kerr-McGee Ponds
Investigation Boundary
I I Kerr-McGee Ponds Fenceline
Exposure Units
Church Rock Mine No. 1 East
Arroyos on Navajo Nation
Site-Wide (for Ecological Risk)
Notes:
bgs
CR-1
CR-1E
EU
Below ground surface
Quivira Church Rock No. 1 Mine
Quivira Church Rock No. 1 East
Mine
Exposure unit
Kerr-McGee Kerr-McGee Corporation
1 inch = 200 feet
1:2,400
200 100 0
N
W E
S
200
I Feet
QUIVIRA CHURCH
ROCK NO. 1 EAST MINE
EXPOSURE UNIT
WITH SAMPLE LOCATIONS
Prepared For: U.S. EPA Region 9
% .R^
Prepared By:
TETRATECH
Task Order No.:
000 1
QUIVIRA MINES
Contract No.:
68HE0923D0002
3/8/2024
Coordinate System:
NAD 1983 State Plane New Mexico West
FIPS 3003 Feet Transverse Mercator
Figure No.:
C-5
-------
Kerr-McGee Roi
NAVAJO
UNITED NL
CORPORATI
Note:
bgs Below ground surface
CR-1 Quivira Troriox Church Rock No. 1
Mine Site
CR-1E Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1
East Mine Site
EU Exposure Unit
Kerr-McGee Kerr-McGee Corporation
Soil Sample Locations
Surface Soil Sample (0-6 inches bgs)
A (includes all lab samples with
bottom depth < 6 inches bgs)
_ Subsurface Soil Sample (below 6 inches bgs)
|_| (includes all lab samples with bottom
depth > 6 inches and < 72 inches bgs)
Mine Lease Boundary
Kerr-McGee Ponds
Investigation Boundary
I I Kerr-McGee Ponds Fenceline
United Nuclear Corporation Site Boundary
Exposure Units
Kerr-McGee Ponds on the
Navajo Nation
Kerr-McGee Ponds on United
Nuclear Corporation Property
Arroyos on Navajo Nation
Arroyos on United Nuclear
Corporation Property
Site-Wide (for Ecological Risk)
1 inch = 150 feet
1:1,800
150 75 0
N
W E
S
150
Feet
KERR-MCGEE PONDS ON THE
NAVAJO NATION EXPOSURE
UNIT WITH SAMPLE LOCATIONS
Prepared For: U.S. EPA Region 9
Prepared By:
TETRA TECH
It
Task Order No.:
000 1
QUIVIRA MINES
Contract No.:
68HE0923D0002
3/8/2024
Coordinate System:
NAD 1983 State Plane New Mexico West
FIPS 3003 Feet Transverse Mercator
Figure No.:
C-6
-------
Kerr-McGee Ponds
N A VA J O^NATIO N
UNITED. NUG1!E'A'R1
GO PRORATION SHE
Location:
EU
Kerr-McGee
Soil Sample Locations
Surface Soil Sample (0-6 inches bgs)
A (includes all lab samples with
bottom depth < 6 inches bgs)
_ Subsurface Soil Sample (below 6 inches bgs)
|_| (includes all lab samples with bottom
depth > 6 inches and < 72 inches bgs)
I I Mine Lease Boundary
Kerr-McGee Ponds
Investigation Boundary
I I Kerr-McGee Ponds Fenceline
United Nuclear Corporation Site Boundary
Exposure Units
Kerr-McGee Ponds on the
Navajo Nation
Kerr-McGee Ponds on United
Nuclear Corporation Property
Arroyos on Navajo Nation
Arroyos on United Nuclear
Corporation Property
EU - Site-Wide (for Ecological Risk)
1 inch = 200 feet
1:2,400
200 100 0
KERR-MCGEE PONDS ON UNITED
NUCLEAR CORPORATION PROPERTY
EXPOSURE UNIT
WITH SAMPLE LOCATIONS
Prepared For: U.S. EPA Region 9
| Prepared By:
TETRATECH
I Task Order No.:
Below ground surface
Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1
Mine Site
Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1
East Mine Site
Exposure unit
Kerr-McGee Corporation
QUIVIRA MINES
Contract No.:
68HE0923D0002
3/8/2024
I Coordinate System:
NAD 1983 State Plane New Mexico West
FIPS 3003 Feet Transverse Mercator
Figure No.:
-------
CRUA-001
CRUA-005
CRUA-006
CRUA-004
CRUA-010
CRUA-002
CRUA-003
CRUA-012
CRUA-008
CRUA-020
CRUA-014
CRUA-009 RWPR-029
CRUA-017
CRUA-
CRUA-025
CRUA-016
CRUA-018
CRUA-029
CRUA-028
CRUA-030
CRUA-032
CRUA-031
Unnamed Arroyo #2
CRUA-033
SSVAJO naIMn
lUNHiEDlNUCliEAR
E0RHQRAT1ON SITE
CRUA-007
CRUA-019
'^=CRUA-021
CRUA-022
'/ 4
L * i ras-
£
Land Use
Difficult Access Open Space
Navajo Resident
United Nuclear Corporation Worker
mSSSM
1,000 2,000 Feet
Kerr-McGee Ponds
7 JA-028
¦MK
",sCRUA-034l
Hk > * «
CRUA-035
CRUA-036
CRPA-U1
CRPA-014
CRPA-f 10
Rj pefne^Ca riyon Arroyo
CRPA-007
CRPA-006
Location:
CRPA-012
CRPA-011
CRPA-006
CRPA-009
..
CRPA-013
Soil Sample Locations
Surface Soil Sample (0-6 inches bgs)
A (includes all lab samples with
bottom depth < 6 inches bgs)
Subsurface Soil Sample (below 6 inches bgs)
I | (includes all lab samples with bottom
depth > 6 inches and < 72 inches bgs)
[__J Mine Lease Boundary
Kerr-McGee Ponds
Investigation Boundary
I I Kerr-McGee Ponds Fenceline
United Nuclear Corporation Site Boundary
Exposure Units
Church Rock Mine No. 1
Church Rock Mine No. 1 East
Kerr-McGee Ponds on the
Navajo Nation
Kerr-McGee Ponds on United
Nuclear Corporation Property
Arroyos on Navajo Nation
Arroyos on United Nuclear
Corporation Property
Site-Wide (for Ecological Risk)
1 inch = 600 feet
1:7,200
600 300 0
CRPA-004
CRPA-005
KMA-SS02
ARROYOS ON THE NAVAJO
NATION EXPOSURE UNIT
WITH SAMPLE LOCATIONS
Prepared For: U.S. EPA Region 9
\mi
%
Prepared By:
TETRATECH
I Task Order No.:
Note:
bgs
Below ground surface
CR-1
Quivira Tronox Church Rock No.
1
Mine Site
CR-1E
Quivira Tronox Church Rock No.
1
East Mine Site
EU
Exposure unit
QUIVIRA MINES
Contract No.:
68HE0923D0002
3/8/2024
Coordinate System:
NAD 1983 State Plane New Mexico West
FIPS 3003 Feet Transverse Mercator
Kerr-McGee Kerr-McGee Corporation
Figure No.:
-------
¦united nuclear
CORPORATION SITE
CRUA-038
CRUA-039
CRPA-001
CRUA-037
CRPA-002
CRPA-003
Location:
S
Detail Area
1,000 2,000 Feet
Kerr-McGee Ponds
• mp Jd! _ii
irV- . "-.v'
INi^
nKB»* Ji Wgy# (J
• ^»vv '
PH — i.* :>• V : ,*fV< :v'A 1 • -
jftUnnamed'Arroyo #2|
-- V$'J
• *
Af'v
iVM IpV<& 'r £ LV®k'*
Irf¦ '• Xv,
If *rt5 • ' * *
idfc mv-;
V 'jJL u -» w' «. . t„
[F^p'eljne CanyonTArroyo]
KMA-SS01
Soil Sample Locations
Surface Soil Sample (0-6 inches bgs)
A (includes all lab samples with
bottom depth < 6 inches bgs)
_ Subsurface Soil Sample (below 6 inches bgs)
|_| (includes all lab samples with bottom
depth > 6 inches and < 72 inches bgs)
Kerr-McGee Ponds
Investigation Boundary
I I Kerr-McGee Ponds Fenceline
United Nuclear Corporation Site Boundary
Exposure Units
Kerr-McGee Ponds on the
Navajo Nation
Kerr-McGee Ponds on United
Nuclear Corporation Property
Arroyos on Navajo Nation
Arroyos on United Nuclear
Corporation Property
Site-Wide (for Ecological Risk)
1 inch = 200 feet
1:2,400
200 100 0
ARROYOS ON UNITED NUCLEAR
CORPORATION PROPERTY
EXPOSURE UNIT
WITH SAMPLE LOCATIONS
Prepared For: U.S. EPA Region 9
C<- il .
siv • i
:>• p :i
.. ' '*
\ *
$ Q \
\WJ
%
I n Prepared By:
TETRATECH
Task Order No.:
Note:
bgs
CR-1
CR-1E
Contract No.:
68HE0923D0002
• w- f J9
_JL - - • /•••
Below ground surface
Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1 |
Mine Site
Quivira Tronox Church Rock No. 1
East Mine Site M
Exposure unit
QUIVIRA MINES
3/8/2024
EU
Kerr-McGee Kerr-McGee Corporation
Coordinate System:
NAD 1983 State Plane New Mexico West
FIPS 3003 Feet Transverse Mercator
Figure No.:
-------
APPLICABLE HUMAN EXPOSURE SCENARIOS ECOLOGICAL EXPOSURE SCENARIOS
United Nuclear
PRIMARY SOURCES OF PRIMARY RELEASE SECONDARY SOURCES SECONDARY RELEASE EXPOSURE Kee'da'whn teeh Kqq ei doo nahaazah dah Corporation EXPOSURE Plants and Birds and
CONTAMINATION SOURCE MEDIA MECHANISMS OF CONTAMINATION MECHANISMS EXPOSURE MEDIA ROUTES (Full-Time Navajo Resident) (Difficult Access Open Space) Outdoor Worker ROUTES Invertebrates Mammals
Background
Sources
(Natural In Situ
Material)
Waste Rock Piles
Former Detention
and Dewatering
Ponds, Former
Industrial Areas,
and Roads
Underground
Mine Workings
Exposed Ore, Rock,
Soil
r
\
Surface Mine
Waste
L
J
Subsurface Mine
Waste
(if brought to
surface)
Radioactive Decay
Radon Gas
Emanation
Wind Erosion
Erosion via
Storm or
Snowmelt Runoff
Mass Wasting
Ambient Air
Soil
Surface Water
i
Sediment
~~J—
Alluvial
Groundwater
Subsurface
Leaching/
Ore Body
Dissolution
I I
. Mine Workings,
Porous or
Fracture Flow
Groundwater
Stormwater/
Snowmelt Runoff
Leaching/
Dissolution
Entrainment/
Deposition
Wells, Seeps, and
Springs
(Formation
Groundwater)
Plant Uptake/
Uptake through
Food Chain
Gamma Radiation
Air
Soil/Sediment
Water
Plants/Animals
Gamma Radiation
Air
Soil/Sediment
Surface Water
Groundwater
Cultivated Plants
Wild Plants
Animals
External Exposure
Inhalation
Incidental Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Ingestion
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Ingestion
External Exposure
Inhalation
Dermal/Direct Contact
Ingestion
Trophic Transfer
Dermal/Direct Contact
Ingestion
Trophic Transfer
Ingestion
Ingestion
Trophic Transfer
Notes:
X Indicates the exposure pathway is potentially complete and is evaluated in the risk assessment except as noted.
— Indicates the exposure pathway is not complete or de minimis and is not evaluated in the risk assessment
1 The human health risk evaluation does not include inhalation of radon by humans or animals. Because radon is a gas and readily disperses in outdoor air, the risk in outdoor is minimal. Radon in indoor air is a potential risk for future residential receptors; however, radon
exposure is building-specific and the buildings are not currently present and, thus, cannot be evaluated. Furthermore, because radon is a known risk in the area, any future buildings would likely be constructed to mitigate this known risk.
2 The human health risk evaluation does not include ingestion of surface water or groundwater by humans or animals. Safe drinking water is supplied to residents in the Quivira Tronox Mines area. Wells used for livestock have been tested and are upgradient of the known groundwater contamination in the area.
The arroyos are mostly dry, and the ponds are dry since mine operations have stopped. If surface or groundwater use patterns change in the future, the risk from use should be evaluated.
3 The human health risk evaluation includes ingestion of select cultivated plants (crops) by this receptor. Scenario inputs were provided by the Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency (NNEPA) (2021).
4 The human health risk evaluation includes ingestion, dermal (metals only), and inhalation of select wild herbs and medicinal plants by this receptor. Scenario inputs were provided by NNEPA (2021).
5 The human health risk evaluation includes ingestion of home-raised animals (meat, milk, and eggs) and hunted animals (meat only) for this receptor. Scenario inputs were provided by NNEPA (2021).
6 The ecological risk evaluation includes evaluation of external radiation based on exposure to gamma-emitting radionuclides from contaminated soil and evaluation of internal radiation through plant uptake, incidental soil ingestion, and food web uptake (Los Alamos National Laboratory [LANL] 2015).
7 Potential exposures include inhalation of ambient air and air in burrows and underground mines. The ecological risk evaluation does not include evaluation of the inhalation pathway.
8 The ecological risk evaluation does not include evaluation of direct contact with or ingestion of surface water.
References:
Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). 2015. "Screening-Level Ecological Risk Assessment Methods." Revision 4. EP2015-0174. October 29.
Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency (NNEPA). 2021. "Navajo Tribe Provisional Reasonable Maximum Exposures RME for the Navajo Risk Assessments." Draft. September 15.
Figure C-10. Quivira Mines Risk Assessment Conceptual Site Model
-------
TABLES
-------
Table C-1. Soil Results Data Summary and Contaminant of Potential Concern Screening
Constituent of
Interest3
Detection
Frequency13
Units
Minimum
Detected
Concentration
(qualifier)b
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
(qualifier)b
Location of
Maximum
Concentration13
Depth of
Maximum
Concentration
(inches bgs)b
COPC
Screening
Level0
Include
Constituent
as a
COPC?d
Radionuclides 8
Uranium-238
41 / 160
pCi/g
0.7
52.1
KMP-SB28-0042-0048-01
42-48
0.032
Yes
Uranium-234
24 / 24
pCi/g
0.7
49.4
KMP-SB28-0060-0066-02
60-66
0.028
Yes
Thorium-230
41 / 41
pCi/g
0.76
92 M3
CELI-502 SS3 3-4.5
36-54
0.13
Yes
Radium-226
797 / 797
pCi/g
0.41 LT,G
468 M3,G
C1LP-401 SS4 4.5-6
54-72
0.00053
Yes
Metals
Aluminum
126 / 126
mg/kg
1,400
9,600
KMP-SB24-0048-0054-01
48-54
1,710
Yes
Antimony
125 / 126
mg/kg
0.038 J
0.26
KMP-SS75-0000-0003-02
0-3
0.45
No
Arsenic
175 / 175
mg/kg
2
11
KMP-12-00
0-2
0.025
Yes
Barium
169 / 169
mg/kg
20
420
CR1E-SS15-0000-0003-01
0-3
197
Yes
Beryllium
126 / 126
mg/kg
0.2
1.0
CR1E-SS12-0000-0003-01
0-3
3.5
No
Cadmium
154 / 169
mg/kg
0.043 J
0.25
CR1-SS21-0000-0003-01
0-3
0.052
Yes
Chromium
169 / 169
mg/kg
2.3
24 J
KMP-SS75-0000-0003-02
0-3
0.027
Yes
Cobalt
126 / 126
mg/kg
2.5
10
CR1E-SS12-0000-0003-01
0-3
0.30
Yes
Copper
126 / 126
mg/kg
3.2
21
CR1-SS21-0000-0003-01
0-3
8.0
Yes
Iron
126 / 126
mg/kg
5,000
23,000
CR1E-SS10-0000-0003-01
0-3
865
Yes
Lead
169 / 169
mg/kg
4.8
130 J
KMP-SS75-0000-0003-02
0-3
200
No
Manganese
126 / 126
mg/kg
89
400
KMA-SS02-0012-0018-01
12-18
4.5
Yes
Molybdenum
165 / 175
mg/kg
0.15 J
1.8
CELI-502 SS9
36-54
1.5
Yes
Nickel
126 / 126
mg/kg
2.7
20
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-01
0-3
28
No
Selenium
170 / 175
mg/kg
0.47 J
37
KMP-16-18
18-24
1.8
Yes
Silver
29 / 169
mg/kg
0.057 J
0.19
KMP-22-18
18-24
2.3
No
Thallium
126 / 126
mg/kg
0.048
0.22
CR1E-SS12-0000-0003-01
0-3
0.0098
Yes
Uranium
226 / 226
mg/kg
0.37
210
CELI-502 SS3 3-4.5
36-54
0.32
Yes
Vanadium
175 / 175
mg/kg
5.4
58
KMP-16-18
18-24
8.2
Yes
Zinc
126 / 126
mg/kg
18
95
KMP-SS75-0000-0003-01
0-3
174
No
Notes:
a Bolded constituents are selected as human health COPCs because based on the maximum detected concentration, the cancer risk is greater than one in one
million (1E-06) or noncancer hazard quotient is greater than 0.1.
b Includes soil and sediment samples collected from all depths from within the risk assessment boundary at all exposure units.
c The COPC screening levels are calculated using the NAUM Risk Calculator (USEPA 2024c) for the Kee'da'whn teeh (full-time Navajo resident) using a target risk of
1E-06 and target hazard quotient of 0.1 except for lead. The lead screening value is based on the recommended RSL for residential soil (USEPA 2024a).
d A constituent is included as a COPC for the human health risk assessment if the maximum detected concentration exceeds the COPC screening level.
e When uranium-238 is not in SE, site data for uranium-238, uranium-234, and thorium-230 in conjunction with radium-226 in SE toxicity values can be used to calculate the
risk for the entire U-238 decay chain.
Page 1 of 2
-------
Table C-1. Soil Results Data Summary and Contaminant of Potential Concern Screening
Notes (Continued):
f In the absence of speciated chromium data, chromium is evaluated using the assumption that it is 100 percent hexavalent chromium (USEPA 2024b).
No speciated chromium data are available.
bgs
Below ground surface
COPC
Contaminant of potential concern
G
Sample density differs by more than 15 percent of the LCS density
J
Estimated concentration
LCS
Laboratory control sample
LT
Less than
M3
The requested MDC was not met, but the reported activity is greater than the reported MDC
MDC
Minimum detectable concentration
mg/kg
Milligram per kilogram
NAUM
Navajo abandoned uranium mine
pCi/g
Picocurie per gram
RSL
Regional screening level
USEPA
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
References:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2024a. "Updated Residential Soil Lead Guidance for CERCLA Sites and RCRA Corrective Action Facilities." Office of Land
and Emergency Management. January 17.
USEPA. 2024b. "Navajo Abandoned Uranium Mines Risk Assessment Methodology." Draft Final. March.
USEPA. 2024c. "Navajo Abandoned Uranium Mine Risk Calculator." Version 1.03. March.
Page 2 of 2
-------
Table C-2. Exposure Unit Summary of Land Use, Geologic Formation, Type, Area, and Available Samples
Exposure
Unit
Land Use/
Receptor
Geologic
Formation
Type
Area
(acre)
Number of Surface Soil
(or Sediment) Samples
(0-6 inches bgs)3
Number of Subsurface Soil
Samples
(0-72 inches bgs)3
Quivira Tronox Church
Rock Mine
No. 1
Kee'da'whn teeh
(Full-Time Navajo
Resident)
Kcb
Kcda
Alluvium
Waste Piles
TENORM
53.3
Radium-226: 142
Uranium-238, Uranium-234, and
Thorium-230: 3
Uranium: 82
Metals: 30
Radium-226: 302
Uranium-238, Uranium-234, and
Thorium-230: 3
Uranium: 82
Arsenic, Molybdenum, Selenium,
Vanadium: 32
All Other Metals: 30
Quivira Tronox Church
Rock Mine
No. 1 East
Kee'da'whn teeh
(Full-Time Navajo
Resident)
Kcc
Kmm
Alluvium
Waste Piles
TENORM
13.9
Radium-226: 65
Uranium-238, Uranium-234, and
Thorium-230: 2
Metals: 15
Radium-226: 123
Uranium-238, Uranium-234, and
Thorium-230: 2
Arsenic, Molybdenum, Selenium,
Uranium, Vanadium: 19
All Other Metals: 15
Kerr-McGee Ponds on
the Navajo Nation
Kee'da'whn teeh
(Full-Time Navajo
Resident)
Kmm
Alluvium
TENORM
2.23
Radium-226: 5
Uranium-238, Uranium-234, and
Thorium-230: 1
Arsenic, Barium, Cadmium,
Chromium, Lead, Molybdenum,
Selenium, Silver, Uranium,
Vanadium: 5
All Other Metals: 3
Radium-226: 7
Uranium-238, Uranium-234,
Thorium-230: 1
Arsenic, Barium, Cadmium,
Chromium, Lead, Molybdenum,
Selenium, Silver, Uranium,
Vanadium: 7
All Other Metals: 5
Kerr-McGee Ponds on
United Nuclear
Corporation Property
United Nuclear
Corporation Outdoor
Worker
Kmm
Alluvium
TENORM
19.2
Radium-226: 54
Uranium-238, Uranium-234, and
Thorium-230: 4
Arsenic, Barium, Cadmium,
Chromium, Lead, Molybdenum,
Selenium, Silver, Uranium,
Vanadium: 54
All Other Metals: 35
Radium-226: 96
Uranium-238, Uranium-234 and
Thorium-230: 8
Arsenic, Barium, Cadmium,
Chromium, Lead, Molybdenum,
Selenium, Silver, Uranium,
Vanadium: 96
All Other Metals: 61
Arroyos on the Navajo
Nation
Kqq ei doo nahaazah
dah (Difficult Access
Open Space)
Alluvium
TENORM
16.1
Radium-226: 94
Uranium: 7
Arsenic, Barium, Cadmium,
Chromium, Lead, Molybdenum,
Selenium, Silver, Vanadium: 3
All Other Metals: 1
Radium-226: 135
Uranium: 9
Arsenic, Barium, Cadmium,
Chromium, Lead, Molybdenum,
Selenium, Silver, Vanadium: 4
All Other Metals: 2
Page 1 of 2
-------
Table C-2. Exposure Unit Summary of Land Use, Geologic Formation, Type, Area, and Available Samples
Exposure
Unit
Land Use/
Receptor
Geologic
Formation
Type
Area
(acre)
Number of Surface Soil
(or Sediment) Samples
(0-6 inches bgs)3
Number of Subsurface Soil
Samples
(0-72 inches bgs)3
Arroyos on United
Nuclear Corporation
Property
United Nuclear
Corporation Outdoor
Worker
Alluvium
TENORM
3.25
Radium-226: 13
Metals: 1
Radium-226: 20
Metals: 2
Ecological Risk Assessment
Site-Wide
Ecological Receptors
Kcb
Kcc
Kcda
Kmm
Alluvium
Entire Site
137
Radium-226: 375
Uranium-238, Uranium-234, and
Thorium-230: 10
Uranium: 164
Arsenic, Barium, Cadmium,
Chromium, Lead, Molybdenum,
Selenium, Silver, Vanadium: 108
All Other Metals: 85
Radium-226: 683
Uranium-238, Uranium-234, and
Thorium-230: 14
Uranium: 213
Arsenic, Molybdenum, Selenium,
Vanadium: 160
Barium, Cadmium, Chromium,
Lead, Silver: 154
All Other Metals: 115
Notes:
a The total number of samples per area used in the risk assessment.
bgs Below ground surface
Kcb Bartlett Barren Member
Kcc Crevasse Canyon Formation
Kcda Dalton Sandstone Member
Kerr-McGee Kerr-McGee Corporation
Kmm Mulatto Tongue of Mancos Shale
TENORM Technologically enhanced naturally occurring radioactive material
Page 2 of 2
-------
Table C-3. Human Health Exposure Parameters
Input Parameter
Symbol
Units
Receptor
Kee'da'whii teeh
(Full-time Navajo
Resident)3
Kqq ei doo
nahaazah dah
(Difficult Access
Open Space)3
UNC Outdoor
Workerb
Common Parameters
Exposure Duration - Adult
ED
years
69
69
25
Exposure Duration - Child
EDc
years
6
6
—
Exposure Duration - Lifetime Total
EDa
years
75
75
25
Exposure Time - Lifetime Total
t
years
75
75
25
Averaging Time - Cancer
ATc
days
27,375
27,375
25,550
Averaging Time - Noncancer - Adult
ATnc
days
25,185
25,185
9,125
Averaging Time - Noncancer - Child
ATnc
days
2,190
2,190
—
Exposure Frequency - Adult
EFa
days/year
350
30
100
Exposure Frequency - Child
EFc
days/year
350
30
—
Consumption Exposure Frequency for Animal and
Plant Products - Adult
CEFa
days/year
350
30
0
Consumption Exposure Frequency for Animal and
Plant Products - Child
CEFc
days/year
350
30
-
Body Weight - Adult
BWa
kg
80
80
80
Body Weight - Child
BWc
kg
15
15
—
Conversion Factor 1
CF1
g/mg
1/1,000
Conversion Factor 2
CF2
kg/mg
1/1,000,000
Conversion Factor 3
CF3
day/hours
1/24
Conversion Factor 4
CF4
fl/kg
1,000
Conversion Factor 5
CF5
year/days
1/365
Conversion Factor 6
CF6
kg/g
1/1,000
Conversion Factor 7
CF7
pCi/Bq
27.03
Decay Constant
A
1/year
Radionuclide-specific
Soil Ingestion Parameters
Onsite Soil Ingestion Rate - Adult
IRSa
mg/day
360
15
100
Onsite Soil Ingestion Rate - Child
IRSc
mg/day
400
17
-
Page 1 of 6
-------
Table C-3. Human Health Exposure Parameters
Input Parameter
Symbol
Units
Receptor
Kee'da'whii teeh
(Full-time Navajo
Resident)3
Kqq ei doo
nahaazah dah
(Difficult Access
Open Space)3
UNC Outdoor
Workerb
Dust Inhalation Parameters
Inhalation Rate when Exposed - Adult
IRAres-a
m3/day
25
25
20
Inhalation Rate when Exposed - Child
IRAres-c
m3/day
10
10
-
Exposure Time - Adult
ETa
hours/day
22
1
8
Exposure Time - Child
ETc
hours/day
22
1
—
City/Climatic Zone
—
—
Albuquerque, New Mexico
Mean Annual Wind Speed
Um
m/s
4.02
Areal extent of site surface soil contamination
As
acres
0.5
Fraction of Vegetative Cover
V
—
0.5
Particulate Emission Factor
PEF
m3/kg
6.61 E+09
Radiation External Exposure Parameters
Gamma Shielding Factor - Outdoor
GSF0
-
1
1
1
Gamma Shielding Factor - Indoor
GSFj
0.7
-
-
Exposure Time on Site Outdoors - Adult
ETa.0
hours/day
12
1
8
Exposure Time on Site Indoors - Adult
ETaH
10
1
0
Exposure Time on Site Outdoors - Child
ETC.0
hours/day
12
1
-
Exposure Time on Site Indoors - Child
o
1—
LU
10
1
-
Metals Dermal Exposure Parameters
Surface Area - Adult
SAa
cm2/day
6,032
6,032
6,032
Surface Area - Child
SAc
cm2/day
2,373
2,373
-
Adherence Factor - Adult
AFa
mg/cm2
0.07
0.07
0.07
Adherence Factor - Child
AFc
mg/cm2
0.2
0.2
-
Plant Consumption Parameters
Total Plant Ingestion Rate - Adult
IRa
g/day
834
834
—
Total Plant Ingestion Rate - Child
IRc
g/day
417
417
—
Produce
Contaminated
Fraction
Annual Average
CFproduce
—
0.55
—
—
Fall
—
—
0.75
—
—
Winter
—
—
0.5
—
—
Spring
—
—
0.3
—
—
Summer
—
—
0.65
—
—
Herbs/medicinal
CFmedicinal
-
100%
8.3%
-
Page 2 of 6
-------
Table C-3. Human Health Exposure Parameters
Receptor
Input Parameter
Symbol
Units
Kee'da'whii teeh
(Full-time Navajo
Resident)3
Kqq ei doo
nahaazah dah
(Difficult Access
Open Space)3
UNC Outdoor
Workerb
Plant Consumption Parameters (continued)
Corn - White
—
10%
—
—
Corn - Blue
—
10%
—
—
Corn - Yellow
—
5%
—
—
Corn - Red Speckled
—
3%
—
—
Corn - Sweet Corn
—
2%
—
—
Squash - Pumpkin
—
2%
—
—
Squash - Other Squash
—
8%
—
—
Melons - Watermelon
—
5%
—
—
Melons - Cantaloupe
—
5%
—
—
Tree Fruit - Apples
—
5%
—
—
Diet Fraction
Tree Fruit - Apricots
DF
—
5%
—
—
Tree Fruit - Peaches
—
5%
—
—
Other Vegetables - Beans
—
10%
—
—
Other Vegetables - Brussels
Sprouts
-
2%
-
-
Other Vegetables - Cucumbers
—
2%
—
—
Other Vegetables - Tomatoes
—
2%
—
—
Other Vegetables - Chili
—
5%
—
—
Other Vegetables - Onions
—
2%
—
—
Other Vegetables - Potatoes
—
2%
—
—
Herbs and Medicinal
—
10%
10%
—
Plant-Soil Transfer Factor
Bvwet
pCi/g-fresh plant
per pCi/g-dry soil
Plant-specific based on plant typec
-
Mass-Loading Factor
MLF
g-dry soil per
q-fresh plant
Plant-specific based on plant typec
-
Page 3 of 6
-------
Table C-3. Human Health Exposure Parameters
Receptor
Input Parameter
Symbol
Units
Kee'da'whii teeh
(Full-time Navajo
Resident)3
Kqq ei doo
nahaazah dah
(Difficult Access
Open Space)3
UNC Outdoor
Workerb
Animal Consumption Parameters
Total Animal Ingestion Rate - Adult
IRa
g/day
983
983
—
Total Animal Ingestion Rate - Child
IRc
g/day
491.5
491.5
—
Chicken
CF
—
5%
5%
—
Chicken Eggs
CF
—
75%
75%
—
Beef
CF
—
25%
25%
—
Milk - Cow
CF
—
1%
1%
—
Pig
CF
—
5%
5%
—
Goat
CF
—
100%
100%
—
Milk - Goat
CF
—
100%
100%
—
Contaminated
Fraction
Sheep
CF
—
90%
90%
—
Milk - Sheep
CF
—
90%
90%
—
Horse
CF
—
100%
100%
—
Domesticated Turkey
CF
—
5%
5%
—
Wild Turkey
CF
—
2%
2%
—
Deer
CF
—
2%
2%
—
Elk
CF
—
2%
2%
—
Rabbit
CF
—
100%
100%
—
Prairie Dog
CF
—
100%
100%
—
Badger
CF
—
100%
100%
—
Chicken
DF
—
20%
20%
—
Chicken Eggs
DF
—
7%
7%
—
Beef
DF
—
25%
25%
—
Milk - Cow
DF
—
6%
6%
—
Pig
DF
—
7%
7%
—
Goat
DF
—
5%
5%
—
Milk - Goat
DF
—
1%
1%
—
Sheep
DF
—
20%
20%
—
Diet Fraction
Milk - Sheep
DF
—
0%
0%
—
Horse
DF
—
1%
1%
—
Domesticated Turkey
DF
—
0.3%
0.3%
—
Wild Turkey
DF
—
0.2%
0.2%
—
Deer
DF
—
3%
3%
—
Elk
DF
—
3%
3%
—
Rabbit
DF
—
1%
1%
—
Prairie Dog
DF
—
1%
1%
—
Badger
DF
-
1%
1%
—
Page 4 of 6
-------
Table C-3. Human Health Exposure Parameters
Input Parameter
Symbol
Units
Receptor
Kee'da'whii teeh
(Full-time Navajo
Resident)3
Kqq ei doo
nahaazah dah
(Difficult Access
Open Space)3
UNC Outdoor
Workerb
Animal Consumption Parameters
continued)
Mass-Loading Factor for Pasture
MLFpasture
g-dry soil per
a-drv plant
0.25
-
Density of Milk
pm
kg/L
1.03
-
Soil Intake Rate
Qs
kg/day
Animal-specificd
-
Fodder Intake Rate
Qp
kg/day
Animal-specificd
-
Bioaccumulation Factor for Metals
Ba
day/kg
Animal-specificd
-
Other Dine Lifeways 8
Age-Adjusted
Ingestion Rate
of Medicinal
Plants
Navajo Tea
IFadj
g/day
1.0
1.0
—
Sumac (Skunkbush and Other)
IFadj
g/day
6.4
6.4
—
Soaptree Yucca
IFadj
g/day
6.4
6.4
—
Sagebrush
IFadj
g/day
12.9
12.9
—
Corn Pollen and Other Corn
IFadj
g/day
19.3
19.3
—
Other Plant Types
IFadj
g/day
6.4
6.4
—
Adult Dermal
Rate of
Medicinal Plants
Navajo Tea
DCRa
g/day
2.1
2.1
—
Sumac (Skunkbush and Other)
DCRa
g/day
38.6
38.6
—
Soaptree Yucca
DCRa
g/day
38.6
38.6
—
Sagebrush
DCRa
g/day
12.9
12.9
—
Corn Pollen and Other Corn
DCRa
g/day
38.6
38.6
—
Other Plant Types
DCRa
g/day
6.4
6.4
—
Mass of Plant
Available for
Inhalation
Sagebrush
IMa
g/day
25.7
25.7
—
Corn Pollen and Other Corn
IMa
g/day
12.9
12.9
—
Other Plant Types
IMa
g/day
6.4
6.4
—
Inhalation
Fraction
Sagebrush
IF
—
10%
10%
—
Corn Pollen and Other Corn
IF
—
10%
10%
—
Other Plant Types
IF
-
10%
10%
-
Page 5 of 6
-------
Table C-3. Human Health Exposure Parameters
Notes:
a Exposure inputs for the Navajo receptors provided by NNEPA (2021).
b Default values for the UNC outdoor worker receptor are from the PRG Calculator (USEPA 2023b) and RSL Calculator (USEPA 2023c) except for days per week
^l^l^nl^eaficll^pGts^reyrom^ppln'Six feaof&e^avajo^ln8oned Uranium Mines Risk Assessment Methodology" (USEPA 2024b).
d Animal-specific inputs are from Appendix B of the "Navajo Abandoned Uranium Mines Risk Assessment Methodology" (USEPA 2024b).
e Input parameters for Other Dine Lifeways were only provided for adult receptors (NNEPA 2021).
-
Not applicable
m/s
Meter per second
cm2/day
Square centimeter per day
m3/day
Cubic meter per day
day/kg
Day per kilogram
m3/kg
Cubic meter per kilogram
g
Gram
mg/cm2
Milligram per square centimeter
g/day
Gram per day
mg/day
Milligram per day
g/kg
Gram per kilogram
NNEPA
Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency
g/mg
Gram per milligram
pCi/Bq
Picocurie per becquerel
kg
Kilogram
pCi/g
Picocurie per gram
kg/day
Kilogram per day
PRG
Preliminary remediation goal
kg/g
Kilogram per gram
RSL
Regional screening level
kg/L
Kilogram per liter
UNC
United Nuclear Corporation
kg/mg
Kilogram per milligram
USEPA
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
References:
Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency (NNEPA). 2021. "Navajo Tribe Provisional Reasonable Maximum Exposures for the Navajo Risk Assessments."
yr§ft.^9^t5f¥fflM)'t^l5Protection Agency (USEPA). 2023b. "Preliminary Remediation Goals for Radionuclides (PRG)." September.
https://epa-prgs.ornl.gov/cgi-bin/radionuclides/rprg_search.
USEPA. 2023c. "Regional Screening Levels (RSLs)." November, https://epa-prgs.ornl.gov/cgi-bin/chemicals/csl_search.
USEPA. 2024b. "Navajo Abandoned Uranium Mines Risk Assessment Methodology." Draft Final. March.
Page 6 of 6
-------
Table C-4. Exposure Point Concentrations for Human Health Risk Assessment
Church Rock Mine No. 1
COPCa
Units
Detection
Frequency
Number of
High
Nondetect
Results'3
Maximum
Concentration
(qualifier)
Location of Maximum
Concentration
Arithmetic
Mean0
UCL95 /
Distribution1
Exposure Point Concentration
Value6
Statistic®
Methodf
Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
Uranium-238
pCi/g
3 / 3
-
1.12
CR1-SS16-0000-0003-01
0.987
-
-
1.1
Maximum
(1)
Uranium-234
pCi/g
3 / 3
-
1.21
CR1-SS16-0000-0003-01
0.977
-
-
1.2
Maximum
(1)
Thorium-230
pCi/g
3 / 3
-
1.71
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-01
1.343
-
-
1.7
Maximum
(1)
Radium-226
pCi/g
150 / 150
-
48.5 M3
RWPR-SS-002 (1.5-2)
5.464
6.68
NP
6.7
UCL95
(14)
Aluminum
mg/kg
30 / 30
-
7,000
CR1-SS21-0000-0003-01
4,267
4,633
N
4,600
UCL95
(2)
Arsenic
mg/kg
30 / 30
-
6.1
CR1-SS25-0000-0003-01,
CR1-SS26-0000-0003-01
4.613
4.904
N
4.9
UCL95
(2)
Barium
mg/kg
30 / 30
-
330
CR1-SS24-0000-0003-01
92.13
110.5
NP
110
UCL95
(14)
Cadmium
mg/kg
29 / 30
0
0.25
CR1-SS21-0000-0003-01
0.129
0.144
N
0.14
UCL95
(3)
Chromium
mg/kg
30 / 30
-
13
CR1-SS32-0000-0003-01
5.257
5.98
LN
6.0
UCL95
(14)
Cobalt
mg/kg
30 / 30
-
8.3
CR1-SS21-0000-0003-01
5.63
6.066
N
6.1
UCL95
(2)
Copper
mg/kg
30 / 30
-
21
CR1-SS21-0000-0003-01
10.46
11.85
N
12
UCL95
(2)
Iron
mg/kg
30 / 30
-
13,000
CR1-SS09-0000-0003-01,
CR1-SS21-0000-0003-01,
CR1-SS26-0000-0003-01
10,163
10726
N
11,000
UCL95
(2)
Manganese
mg/kg
30 / 30
-
200
CR1-SS24-0000-0003-01,
CR1-SS25-0000-0003-01
151.6
160.4
N
160
UCL95
(2)
Molybdenum
mg/kg
30 / 30
-
1 J
CR1-SS26-0000-0003-01
0.288
0.321
N
0.32
UCL95
(2)
Selenium
mg/kg
30 / 30
-
14
CR1-SS28-0000-0003-01
2
3.38
NP
3.4
UCL95
(14)
Thallium
mg/kg
30 / 30
-
0.21
CR1-SS21-0000-0003-01
0.125
0.137
N
0.14
UCL95
(2)
Uranium
mg/kg
86 / 86
-
61
RWPR-SS-002 (1.5-2)
5.504
7.315
LN
7.3
UCL95
(14)
Vanadium
mg/kg
30 / 30
-
20
CR1-SS26-0000-0003-01,
CR1-SS28-0000-0003-01
13.34
14.33
N
14
UCL95
(2)
Page 1 of 13
-------
Table C-4. Exposure Point Concentrations for Human Health Risk Assessment
Church Rock Mine No. 1
COPCa
Units
Detection
Frequency
Number of
High
Nondetect
Results'3
Maximum
Concentration
(qualifier)
Location of Maximum
Concentration
Arithmetic
Mean0
UCL95 /
Distribution1
Exposure Point Concentration
Value6
Statistic®
Methodf
Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs)
Uranium-238
pCi/g
3 / 3
-
1.12
CR1-SS16-0000-0003-01
0.987
-
-
1.1
Maximum
(1)
Uranium-234
pCi/g
3 / 3
-
1.21
CR1-SS16-0000-0003-01
0.977
-
-
1.2
Maximum
(1)
Thorium-230
pCi/g
3 / 3
-
1.71
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-01
1.343
-
-
1.7
Maximum
(1)
Radium-226
pCi/g
302 / 302
-
468 M3,G
C1LP-401 SS4 4.5-6
13.000
17.15
NP
17
UCL95
(14)
Aluminum
mg/kg
30 / 30
-
7,000
CR1-SS21-0000-0003-01
4,267
4,633
N
4,600
UCL95
(2)
Arsenic
mg/kg
32 / 32
-
6.1
CR1-SS25-0000-0003-01,
CR1-SS26-0000-0003-01
4.544
4.827
N
4.8
UCL95
(2)
Barium
mg/kg
30 / 30
-
330
CR1-SS24-0000-0003-01
92.13
110.5
NP
110
UCL95
(14)
Cadmium
mg/kg
29 / 30
0
0.25
CR1-SS21-0000-0003-01
0.129
0.144
N
0.14
UCL95
(3)
Chromium
mg/kg
30 / 30
-
13
CR1-SS32-0000-0003-01
5.257
5.98
LN
6.0
UCL95
(14)
Cobalt
mg/kg
30 / 30
-
8.3
CR1-SS21-0000-0003-01
5.63
6.066
N
6.1
UCL95
(2)
Copper
mg/kg
30 / 30
-
21
CR1-SS21-0000-0003-01
10.46
11.85
N
12
UCL95
(2)
Iron
mg/kg
30 / 30
-
13,000
CR1-SS09-0000-0003-01,
CR1-SS21-0000-0003-01,
CR1-SS26-0000-0003-01
10,163
10726
N
11,000
UCL95
(2)
Manganese
mg/kg
30 / 30
-
200
CR1-SS24-0000-0003-01,
CR1-SS25-0000-0003-01
151.6
160.4
N
160
UCL95
(2)
Molybdenum
mg/kg
30 / 32
2
1 J
CR1-SS26-0000-0003-01
0
0
N
0.32
UCL95
(3)
Selenium
mg/kg
30 / 32
0
14
CR1-SS28-0000-0003-01
2
3.138
NP
3.1
UCL95
(15)
Thallium
mg/kg
30 / 30
-
0.21
CR1-SS21-0000-0003-01
0.125
0.137
N
0.14
UCL95
(2)
Uranium
mg/kg
82 / 82
-
61
RWPR-SS-002 (1.5-2)
5.504
7.315
LN
7.3
UCL95
(14)
Vanadium
mg/kg
32 / 32
-
20
CR1-SS26-0000-0003-01,
CR1-SS28-0000-0003-01
13.15
14.1
N
14
UCL95
(2)
Page 2 of 13
-------
Table C-4. Exposure Point Concentrations for Human Health Risk Assessment
Church Rock Mine No. 1 East
COPCa
Units
Detection
Frequency
Number of
High
Nondetect
Results'3
Maximum
Concentration
(qualifier)
Location of Maximum
Concentration
Arithmetic
Mean0
UCL95 /
Distribution1
Exposure Point Concentration
Value6
Statistic®
Methodf
Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
Uranium-238
pCi/g
2 / 2
-
1.27
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-01
1.115
-
-
1.3
Maximum
(1)
Uranium-234
pCi/g
2 / 2
-
1.35
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-01
1.195
-
-
1.4
Maximum
(1)
Thorium-230
pCi/g
2 / 2
-
3.57
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-01
2.365
-
-
3.6
Maximum
(1)
Radium-226
pCi/g
65 / 65
-
86.3 M3,G
CESS-041 (2-6)
6.156
9.31
NP
9.3
UCL95
(14)
Aluminum
mg/kg
14 / 14
-
8,400
CR1E-SS10-0000-0003-01
5,621
6,257
NP
6,300
UCL95
(14)
Arsenic
mg/kg
14 / 14
-
10
CR1E-SS10-0000-0003-01
5.714
6.616
N
6.6
UCL95
(2)
Barium
mg/kg
14 / 14
-
420
CR1E-SS15-0000-0003-01
116.4
161.9
LN
160
UCL95
(14)
Cadmium
mg/kg
14 / 14
-
0.23
CR1E-SS12-0000-0003-01
0.106
0.13
N
0.13
UCL95
(2)
Chromium
mg/kg
14 / 14
-
22
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-01
8.0
10.1
N
10
UCL95
(2)
Cobalt
mg/kg
14 / 14
-
10
CR1E-SS12-0000-0003-01
6.071
6.927
N
6.9
UCL95
(2)
Copper
mg/kg
14 / 14
-
19
CR1E-SS12-0000-0003-01
10.91
12.73
N
13
UCL95
(2)
Iron
mg/kg
14 / 14
-
23,000
CR1E-SS10-0000-0003-01
13,907
15786
NP
16,000
UCL95
(14)
Manganese
mg/kg
14 / 14
-
290
CR1E-SS12-0000-0003-01
181.4
202.1
NP
200
UCL95
(14)
Molybdenum
mg/kg
14 / 14
-
0.40
CR1E-SS12-0000-0003-01,
CR1E-SS15-0000-0003-01
0.27
0.308
N
0.31
UCL95
(2)
Selenium
mg/kg
14 / 14
-
5
CR1E-SS14-0000-0003-01
2
2.957
G
3.0
UCL95
(4)
Thallium
mg/kg
14 / 14
-
0.22
CR1E-SS12-0000-0003-01
0.137
0.156
N
0.16
UCL95
(2)
Uranium
mg/kg
14 / 14
-
6.3
CR1E-SS17-0000-0003-01
2.727
3.58
N
3.6
UCL95
(2)
Vanadium
mg/kg
14 / 14
-
23
CR1E-SS12-0000-0003-01
14.86
16.35
N
16
UCL95
(2)
Page 3 of 13
-------
Table C-4. Exposure Point Concentrations for Human Health Risk Assessment
Church Rock Mine No. 1 East
COPCa
Units
Detection
Frequency
Number of
High
Nondetect
Results'3
Maximum
Concentration
(qualifier)
Location of Maximum
Concentration
Arithmetic
Mean0
UCL95 /
Distribution1
Exposure Point Concentration
Value6
Statistic®
Methodf
Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs)
Uranium-238
pCi/g
2 / 2
-
1.27
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-01
1.115
-
-
1.3
Maximum
(1)
Uranium-234
pCi/g
2 / 2
-
1.35
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-01
1.195
-
-
1.4
Maximum
(1)
Thorium-230
pCi/g
2 / 2
-
3.57
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-01
2.365
-
-
3.6
Maximum
(1)
Radium-226
pCi/g
121 / 121
-
429 M3
CELA-039 (27-33)
31.370
43.02
NP
43.0
UCL99
(14)
Aluminum
mg/kg
14 / 14
-
8,400
CR1E-SS10-0000-0003-01
5,621
6,257
NP
6,300
UCL95
(14)
Arsenic
mg/kg
18 / 18
-
10
CR1E-SS10-0000-0003-01
5.456
6.292
N
6.3
UCL95
(2)
Barium
mg/kg
14 / 14
-
420
CR1E-SS15-0000-0003-01
116.4
161.9
LN
160
UCL95
(14)
Cadmium
mg/kg
14 / 14
-
0.23
CR1E-SS12-0000-0003-01
0.106
0.13
N
0.13
UCL95
(2)
Chromium
mg/kg
14 / 14
-
22
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-01
8.0
10.1
N
10.00
UCL95
(2)
Cobalt
mg/kg
14 / 14
-
10
CR1E-SS12-0000-0003-01
6.071
6.927
N
6.9
UCL95
(2)
Copper
mg/kg
14 / 14
-
19
CR1E-SS12-0000-0003-01
10.91
12.73
N
13
UCL95
(2)
Iron
mg/kg
14 / 14
-
23,000
CR1E-SS10-0000-0003-01
13,907
15786
NP
16,000
UCL95
(14)
Manganese
mg/kg
14 / 14
-
290
CR1E-SS12-0000-0003-01
181.4
202.1
NP
200
UCL95
(14)
Molybdenum
mg/kg
15 / 18
0
1.8
CR1E-SS12-0000-0003-01,
CR1E-SS15-0000-0003-01
0.355
0.513
N
0.51
UCL95
(15)
Selenium
mg/kg
15 / 18
0
23
CR1E-SS14-0000-0003-01
3
5.399
G
5.4
UCL95
(15)
Thallium
mg/kg
14 / 14
-
0.22
CR1E-SS12-0000-0003-01
0.137
0.156
N
0.16
UCL95
(2)
Uranium
mg/kg
16 / 16
-
210
CELI-502 SS3 3-4.5
20.07
41.94
N
42
UCL95
(14)
Vanadium
mg/kg
18 / 18
-
28
CELI-502 SS9
15.89
17.74
N
18
UCL95
(2)
Page 4 of 13
-------
Table C-4. Exposure Point Concentrations for Human Health Risk Assessment
Kerr-McGee Ponds on the Navajo Nation
COPCa
Units
Detection
Frequency
Number of
High
Nondetect
Results'3
Maximum
Concentration
(qualifier)
Location of Maximum
Concentration
Arithmetic
Meanc
UCL95 /
Distribution1
Exposure Point Concentration
Value6
Statistic®
Methodf
Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
Uranium-238
pCi/g
1 / 1
-
1.13
KM P-SS74-0000-0003-01
-
-
-
1.1
Maximum
(1)
Uranium-234
pCi/g
1 / 1
-
0.97
KM P-SS74-0000-0003-01
-
-
-
1.0
Maximum
(1)
Thorium-230
pCi/g
1 / 1
-
2.04
KMP-SS74-0000-0003-01
-
-
-
2.0
Maximum
(1)
Radium-226
pCi/g
5 / 5
-
9.3 J
KM P-SB44-0000-0006-01
5.292
-
-
9.3
Maximum
(1)
Aluminum
mg/kg
3 / 3
-
6,900
KM P-SS49-0000-0003-02
6,333
-
-
6,900
Maximum
(1)
Arsenic
mg/kg
5 / 5
-
5.9
KM P-SS49-0000-0003-02
5.46
-
-
5.9
Maximum
(1)
Barium
mg/kg
5 / 5
-
82
KM P-SB44-0000-0006-01
71.4
-
-
82
Maximum
(1)
Cadmium
mg/kg
5 / 5
-
0.16 J
KMP-SB44-0000-0006-01
0.11
-
-
0.16
Maximum
(1)
Chromium
mg/kg
5 / 5
-
8.2
KMP-14D-00
7.22
-
-
8.2
Maximum
(1)
Cobalt
mg/kg
3 / 3
-
5.2
KMP-SS49-0000-0003-02
4.8
-
-
5.2
Maximum
(1)
Copper
mg/kg
3 / 3
-
11
KMP-SB44-0000-0006-01
9.233
-
-
11
Maximum
(1)
Iron
mg/kg
3 / 3
-
15,000
KM P-SS49-0000-0003-02
13,667
-
-
15,000
Maximum
(1)
Manganese
mg/kg
3 / 3
-
230
KM P-SB44-0000-0006-01
213.3
-
-
230
Maximum
(1)
Molybdenum
mg/kg
5 / 5
-
1 J
KMP-14-00
0.436
-
-
0.55
Maximum
(1)
Selenium
mg/kg
5 / 5
-
2.9
KMP-14D-00
2.080
-
-
2.9
Maximum
(1)
Thallium
mg/kg
3 / 3
-
0.15
KMP-SB44-0000-0006-01,
KM P-SS49-0000-0003-02
0.14
-
-
0.15
Maximum
(1)
Uranium
mg/kg
5 / 5
-
6.2
KM P-SB44-0000-0006-01
2.142
-
-
6.2
Maximum
(1)
Vanadium
mg/kg
5 / 5
-
17
KMP-14-00
15
-
-
17
Maximum
(1)
Page 5 of 13
-------
Table C-4. Exposure Point Concentrations for Human Health Risk Assessment
Kerr-McGee Ponds on the Navajo Nation
COPCa
Units
Detection
Frequency
Number of
High
Nondetect
Results'3
Maximum
Concentration
(qualifier)
Location of Maximum
Concentration
Arithmetic
Meanc
UCL95 /
Distribution1
Exposure Point Concentration
Value6
Statistic®
Methodf
Subsurface Soil (0-66 inches bgs)
Uranium-238
pCi/g
1 / 1
-
1.13
KM P-SS74-0000-0003-01
-
-
-
1.1
Maximum
(1)
Uranium-234
pCi/g
1 / 1
-
0.97
KM P-SS74-0000-0003-01
-
-
-
1.0
Maximum
(1)
Thorium-230
pCi/g
1 / 1
-
2.04
KMP-SS74-0000-0003-01
-
-
-
2.0
Maximum
(1)
Radium-226
pCi/g
7 / 7
-
9.3 J
KM P-SB44-0000-0006-01
4.293
-
-
9.3
Maximum
(1)
Aluminum
mg/kg
5 / 5
-
6,900
KM P-SS49-0000-0003-02
6,500
-
-
6,900
Maximum
(1)
Arsenic
mg/kg
7 / 7
-
5.9
KM P-SS49-0000-0003-02
5.557
-
-
5.9
Maximum
(1)
Barium
mg/kg
7 / 7
-
82
KM P-SB44-0000-0006-01
69.57
-
-
82
Maximum
(1)
Cadmium
mg/kg
7 / 7
-
0.16 J
KM P-SB44-0000-0006-01
0.0974
-
-
0.16
Maximum
(1)
Chromium
mg/kg
7 / 7
-
8.2
KMP-14D-00
7.214
-
-
8.2
Maximum
(1)
Cobalt
mg/kg
5 / 5
-
5.2
KM P-SS49-0000-0003-02
4.92
-
-
5.2
Maximum
(1)
Copper
mg/kg
5 / 5
-
11
KM P-SB44-0000-0006-01
8.96
-
-
11
Maximum
(1)
Iron
mg/kg
5 / 5
-
15,000
KM P-SS49-0000-0003-02
14,000
-
-
15,000
Maximum
(1)
Manganese
mg/kg
5 / 5
-
230
KM P-SB44-0000-0006-01
214
-
-
230
Maximum
(1)
Molybdenum
mg/kg
7 / 7
-
1 J
KMP-14-00
0.416
-
-
0.55
Maximum
(1)
Selenium
mg/kg
7 / 7
-
2.9
KMP-14D-00
1.843
-
-
2.9
Maximum
(1)
Thallium
mg/kg
5 / 5
-
0.15
KMP-SB44-0000-0006-01,
KM P-SS49-0000-0003-02
0.14
-
-
0.15
Maximum
(1)
Uranium
mg/kg
7 / 7
-
6.2
KM P-SB44-0000-0006-01
2.164
-
-
6.2
Maximum
(1)
Vanadium
mg/kg
7 / 7
-
17
KMP-14-00
14.71
-
-
17
Maximum
(1)
Page 6 of 13
-------
Table C-4. Exposure Point Concentrations for Human Health Risk Assessment
Kerr-McGee Ponds on United Nuclear Corporation Property
COPCa
Units
Detection
Frequency
Number of
High
Nondetect
Results'3
Maximum
Concentration
(qualifier)
Location of Maximum
Concentration
Arithmetic
Mean0
UCL95 /
Distribution1
Exposure Point Concentration
Value6
Statistic®
Methodf
Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
Uranium-238
pCi/g
4 / 4
-
2.43
KM P-SS66-0000-0003-01
1.63
-
-
2.4
Maximum
(1)
Uranium-234
pCi/g
4 / 4
-
2.43
KM P-SS50-0000-0003-01
1.68
-
-
2.4
Maximum
(1)
Thorium-230
pCi/g
4 / 4
-
3.41
KMP-SS50-0000-0003-01
2.17
-
-
3.4
Maximum
(1)
Radium-226
pCi/g
54 / 54
-
68.1 M3
KMP-SS75-0000-0003-01
9.51
12.66
LN
13
UCL95
(14)
Aluminum
mg/kg
35 / 35
-
8,300
KMP-SS55-0000-0003-01
6,309
6,553
N
6,600
UCL95
(2)
Arsenic
mg/kg
54 / 54
-
9.2
KMP-07-00
5.731
5.965
N
6.0
UCL95
(2)
Barium
mg/kg
54 / 54
-
170
KMP-SS75-0000-0003-01,
KM P-SS77-0000-0003-01
76.13
82.85
NP
83
UCL95
(14)
Cadmium
mg/kg
51 / 54
0
0.19 J
KMP-SS77-0000-0003-01
0.0995
0.107
N
0.11
UCL95
(3)
Chromium
mg/kg
54 / 54
-
24 J
KM P-SS75-0000-0003-02
7.944
8.546
NP
8.5
UCL95
(14)
Cobalt
mg/kg
35 / 35
-
6.7
KMP-SS55-0000-0003-01
4.966
5.151
N
5.2
UCL95
(2)
Copper
mg/kg
35 / 35
-
18
KM P-SS75-0000-0003-02
9.657
10.52
G
11
UCL95
(4)
Iron
mg/kg
35 / 35
-
19,000
KMP-SS55-0000-0003-01
14609
15207
N
15,000
UCL95
(2)
Manganese
mg/kg
35 / 35
-
310
KMP-SS77-0000-0003-01
210
218
N
220
UCL95
(2)
Molybdenum
mg/kg
50 / 54
0
2
KM P-SS75-0000-0003-02
1
1
N
0.57
UCL95
(3)
Selenium
mg/kg
54 / 54
-
21
KMP-17-00
3
3.963
NP
4.0
UCL95
(14)
Thallium
mg/kg
35 / 35
-
0.18
KMP-SS55-0000-0003-01,
KM P-SS76-0000-0003-01
0.13
0.136
N
0.14
UCL95
(2)
Uranium
mg/kg
54 / 54
-
40
KMP-17-00
5.963
7.684
LN
7.7
UCL95
(14)
Vanadium
mg/kg
54 / 54
-
41
KMP-17-00
17.63
19.04
NP
19
UCL95
(14)
Page 7 of 13
-------
Table C-4. Exposure Point Concentrations for Human Health Risk Assessment
Kerr-McGee Ponds on United Nuclear Corporation Property
COPCa
Units
Detection
Frequency
Number of
High
Nondetect
Results'3
Maximum
Concentration
(qualifier)
Location of Maximum
Concentration
Arithmetic
Meanc
UCL95 /
Distribution1
Exposure Point Concentration
Value6
Statistic®
Methodf
Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs)
Uranium-238
pCi/g
00
00
-
51.5
KMP-SB28-0060-0066-01
7.684
-
-
52
Maximum
(1)
Uranium-234
pCi/g
8 / 8
-
49.4
KMP-SB28-0060-0066-01
7.436
-
-
49
Maximum
(1)
Thorium-230
pCi/g
8 / 8
-
3.41
KMP-SS50-0000-0003-01
1.638
-
-
3.4
Maximum
(1)
Radium-226
pCi/g
96 / 96
-
143.1
KMP-16-18
8.237
11.51
NP
12
UCL95
(14)
Aluminum
mg/kg
61 / 61
-
9,600
KM P-SB24-0048-0054-01
6,413
6,629
N
6,600
UCL95
(2)
Arsenic
mg/kg
96 / 96
-
9.2
KMP-07-00
5.61
5.78
NP
5.8
UCL95
(14)
Barium
mg/kg
96 / 96
-
190
KMP-16-18
70.03
75.33
NP
75
UCL95
(14)
Cadmium
mg/kg
83 / 96
0
0.19 J
KMP-SS77-0000-0003-01
0.0877
0.093
G
0.093
UCL95
(7)
Chromium
mg/kg
96 / 96
-
24 J
KM P-SS75-0000-0003-02
7.685
8.059
NP
8.1
UCL95
(14)
Cobalt
mg/kg
61 / 61
-
7.9
KM P-SB24-0048-0054-01
5.048
5.207
NP
5.2
UCL95
(14)
Copper
mg/kg
61 / 61
-
18
KM P-SS75-0000-0003-02
9.22
9.78
LN
9.8
UCL95
(14)
Iron
mg/kg
61 / 61
-
22,000
KM P-SB24-0048-0054-01
14,480
14952
N
15,000
UCL95
(2)
Manganese
mg/kg
61 / 61
-
310
KMP-SS77-0000-0003-01
212.1
219.2
NP
220
UCL95
(14)
Molybdenum
mg/kg
91 / 96
0
2
KMP-SB28-0036-0042-01
1
1
LN
0.63
UCL95
(15)
Selenium
mg/kg
96 / 96
-
37
KMP-16-18
3
3.746
NP
3.7
UCL95
(14)
Thallium
mg/kg
61 / 61
-
0.21
KMP-SB24-0048-0054-01
0.133
0.138
NP
0.14
UCL95
(14)
Uranium
mg/kg
96 / 96
-
190
KM P-SB28-0042-0048-01
18.58
24.85
NP
25
UCL95
(14)
Vanadium
mg/kg
96 / 96
-
58
KMP-16-18
16.91
18.04
NP
18
UCL95
(14)
Page 8 of 13
-------
Table C-4. Exposure Point Concentrations for Human Health Risk Assessment
Arroyos on the Navajo Nation
COPCa
Units
Detection
Frequency
Number of
High
Nondetect
Results'3
Maximum
Concentration
(qualifier)
Location of Maximum
Concentration
Arithmetic
Mean0
UCL95 /
Distribution1
Exposure Point Concentration
Value6
Statistic®
Methodf
Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
Uranium-238
pCi/g
0 / 0
-
-
-
-
..
-
-
-
Uranium-234
pCi/g
0 / 0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Thorium-230
pCi/g
0 / 0
-
-
-
-
..
-
-
-
Radium-226
pCi/g
94 / 94
-
3.05
CRUA-020.2 (2-6)
1.254
1.326 N
1.3
UCL95
(2)
Aluminum
mg/kg
1 / 1
-
4,700
KMA-SS02-0000-0003-01
-
..
4,700
Maximum
(1)
Arsenic
mg/kg
3 / 3
-
11
KMP-12-00
7.667
-
11
Maximum
(1)
Barium
mg/kg
3 / 3
-
74
KMP-11-00
64
..
74
Maximum
(1)
Cadmium
mg/kg
3 / 3
-
0.064 J
KMP-12-00
0.0545
..
0.064
Maximum
(1)
Chromium
mg/kg
3 / 3
-
6.7
KMP-12-00
5.767
..
6.7
Maximum
(1)
Cobalt
mg/kg
1 / 1
-
4.0
KMA-SS02-0000-0003-01
-
-
4.0
Maximum
(1)
Copper
mg/kg
1 / 1
-
5.1
KMA-SS02-0000-0003-01
-
..
5.1
Maximum
(1)
Iron
mg/kg
1 / 1
-
12,000
KMA-SS02-0000-0003-01
-
-
12,000
Maximum
(1)
Manganese
mg/kg
1 / 1
-
200
KMA-SS02-0000-0003-01
-
..
200
Maximum
(1)
Molybdenum
mg/kg
3 / 3
-
0.81 J
KMP-12-00
0.557
-
0.81
Maximum
(1)
Selenium
mg/kg
3 / 3
-
1.5
KMP-12-00
1.2
..
1.5
Maximum
(1)
Thallium
mg/kg
1 / 1
-
0.092
KMA-SS02-0000-0003-01
-
..
0.092
Maximum
(1)
Uranium
mg/kg
7 / 7
-
2.9
RWPR-SS-029 (0-6)
1.186
..
2.9
Maximum
(1)
Vanadium
mg/kg
3 / 3
-
25
KMP-12-00
17.67
-
25
Maximum
(1)
Page 9 of 13
-------
Table C-4. Exposure Point Concentrations for Human Health Risk Assessment
Arroyos on the Navajo Nation
COPCa
Units
Detection
Frequency
Number of
High
Nondetect
Results'3
Maximum
Concentration
(qualifier)
Location of Maximum
Concentration
Arithmetic
Mean0
UCL95 /
Distribution1
Exposure Point Concentration
Value6
Statistic®
Methodf
Subsurface Soil (0-36 inches bgs)
Uranium-238
pCi/g
0 / 0
-
-
-
-
..
-
-
-
Uranium-234
pCi/g
0 / 0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Thorium-230
pCi/g
0 / 0
-
-
-
-
..
-
-
-
Radium-226
pCi/g
135 / 135
-
3.28
CRUA-020.3 (30-36)
1.414
1.492 G
1.5
UCL95
(6)
Aluminum
mg/kg
2 / 2
-
4,700
KMA-SS02-0000-0003-01
4450
..
4,700
Maximum
(1)
Arsenic
mg/kg
4 / 4
-
11
KMP-12-00
7.15
-
11
Maximum
(1)
Barium
mg/kg
4 / 4
-
75
KMA-SS02-0012-0018-01
66.75
..
75
Maximum
(1)
Cadmium
mg/kg
4 / 4
-
0.073 J
KMA-SS02-0012-0018-01
0.0613
..
0.073
Maximum
(1)
Chromium
mg/kg
4 / 4
-
6.7
KMP-12-00
5.45
..
6.7
Maximum
(1)
Cobalt
mg/kg
2 / 2
-
4.5
KMA-SS02-0012-0018-01
4.25
-
4.5
Maximum
(1)
Copper
mg/kg
2 / 2
-
5.1
KMA-SS02-0000-0003-01
5.1
..
5.1
Maximum
(1)
Iron
mg/kg
2 / 2
-
15,000
KM A-SS02-0012-0018-01
13,500
-
15,000
Maximum
(1)
Manganese
mg/kg
2 / 2
-
400
KM A-SS02-0012-0018-01
300
..
400
Maximum
(1)
Molybdenum
mg/kg
4 / 4
-
0.81 J
KMP-12-00
0.53
-
0.81
Maximum
(1)
Selenium
mg/kg
4 / 4
-
1.5
KMP-12-00
1.125
..
1.5
Maximum
(1)
Thallium
mg/kg
2 / 2
-
0.092
KMA-SS02-0000-0003-01
0.087
-
0.092
Maximum
(1)
Uranium
mg/kg
9 / 9
-
2.9
RWPR-SS-029 (0-6)
1.262
..
2.9
Maximum
(1)
Vanadium
mg/kg
4 / 4
-
25
KMP-12-00
16.5
-
25
Maximum
(1)
Page 10 of 13
-------
Table C-4. Exposure Point Concentrations for Human Health Risk Assessment
Arroyos on United Nuclear Corporation Property
COPCa
Units
Detection
Frequency
Number of
High
Nondetect
Results'3
Maximum
Concentration
(qualifier)
Location of Maximum
Concentration
Arithmetic
Meanc
UCL95 /
Distribution1
Exposure Point Concentration
Value6
Statistic®
Methodf
Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
Uranium-238
pCi/g
0 / 0
-
-
-
-
..
-
-
-
Uranium-234
pCi/g
0 / 0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Thorium-230
pCi/g
0 / 0
-
-
-
-
..
-
-
-
Radium-226
pCi/g
13 / 13
-
1.55 G
CRPA-003.2 (2-6)
0.94
1.075 N
1.1
UCL95
(2)
Aluminum
mg/kg
1 / 1
-
4,400
KM A-SS01-0000-0003-01
-
..
4,400
Maximum
(1)
Arsenic
mg/kg
1 / 1
-
4.6
KM A-SS01-0000-0003-01
-
-
4.6
Maximum
(1)
Barium
mg/kg
1 / 1
-
48
KM A-SS01-0000-0003-01
-
..
48
Maximum
(1)
Cadmium
mg/kg
1 / 1
-
0.054 J
KMA-SS01-0000-0003-01
-
..
0.054
Maximum
(1)
Chromium
mg/kg
1 / 1
-
5
KM A-SS01-0000-0003-01
-
..
5.0
Maximum
(1)
Cobalt
mg/kg
1 / 1
-
4.4
KMA-SS01-0000-0003-01
-
-
4.4
Maximum
(1)
Copper
mg/kg
1 / 1
-
4.7
KM A-SS01-0000-0003-01
-
..
4.7
Maximum
(1)
Iron
mg/kg
1 / 1
-
13,000
KM A-SS01-0000-0003-01
-
-
13,000
Maximum
(1)
Manganese
mg/kg
1 / 1
-
240
KM A-SS01-0000-0003-01
-
..
240
Maximum
(1)
Molybdenum
mg/kg
1 / 1
-
0.28
KM A-SS01-0000-0003-01
-
-
0.28
Maximum
(1)
Selenium
mg/kg
11 / 11
-
1.55
KMA-SS01-0000-0003-01
0.942
1.102 N
1.1
UCL95
(2)
Thallium
mg/kg
0 / 1
0
0.057 U
KMA-SS01-0000-0003-01
-
..
0.057
Maximum-ND
-
Uranium
mg/kg
1 / 1
-
0.091
KM A-SS01-0000-0003-01
-
..
0.09
Maximum
(1)
Vanadium
mg/kg
1 / 1
-
0.53
KM A-SS01-0000-0003-01
-
-
0.53
Maximum
(1)
Page 11 of 13
-------
Table C-4. Exposure Point Concentrations for Human Health Risk Assessment
Arroyos on United Nuclear Corporation Property
COPCa
Units
Detection
Frequency
Number of
High
Nondetect
Results'3
Maximum
Concentration
(qualifier)
Location of Maximum
Concentration
Arithmetic
Mean0
UCL95 /
Distribution1
Exposure Point Concentration
Value6
Statistic®
Methodf
Subsurface Soil (0-36 inches bgs)
Uranium-238
pCi/g
0 / 0
-
-
-
-
..
-
-
-
Uranium-234
pCi/g
0 / 0
-
-
-
-
..
-
-
-
Thorium-230
pCi/g
0 / 0
-
-
-
-
..
-
-
-
Radium-226
pCi/g
20 / 20
-
1.83 G
CRUA-037.3 (30-36)
0.976
1.101 N
1.1
UCL95
(2)
Aluminum
mg/kg
2 / 2
-
4,700
KM A-SS01-0012-0018-01
4,550
..
4,700
Maximum
(1)
Arsenic
mg/kg
2 / 2
-
4.8
KM A-SS01-0012-0018-01
4.7
..
5
Maximum
(1)
Barium
mg/kg
2 / 2
-
62
KM A-SS01-0012-0018-01
55
..
62
Maximum
(1)
Cadmium
mg/kg
2 / 2
-
0.055 J
KM A-SS01-0012-0018-01
0.0545
..
0.055
Maximum
(1)
Chromium
mg/kg
2 / 2
-
5
KM A-SS01-0012-0018-01
4.95
..
5.0
Maximum
(1)
Cobalt
mg/kg
2 / 2
-
4.4
KMA-SS01-0000-0003-01
4.15
-
4.4
Maximum
(1)
Copper
mg/kg
2 / 2
-
5.4
KM A-SS01-0012-0018-01
5.05
..
5.4
Maximum
(1)
Iron
mg/kg
2 / 2
-
15,000
KM A-SS01-0012-0018-01
14,000
-
15,000
Maximum
(1)
Manganese
mg/kg
2 / 2
-
280
KM A-SS01-0012-0018-01
260
..
280
Maximum
(1)
Molybdenum
mg/kg
2 / 2
-
0.28
KMA-SS01-0000-0003-01,
KM A-SS01-0012-0018-01
0.28
-
0.28
Maximum
(1)
Selenium
mg/kg
18 / 18
-
1.83
KMA-SS01-0000-0003-01
0.981
1.12 N
1.1
UCL95
(2)
Thallium
mg/kg
0 / 2
0
0.059 U
KMA-SS01-0000-0003-01
-
..
0.059
Maximum-ND
-
Uranium
mg/kg
2 / 2
-
0.091
KM A-SS01-0012-0018-01
0.0885
..
0.09
Maximum
(1)
Vanadium
mg/kg
2 / 2
-
0.62
KM A-SS01-0012-0018-01
0.575
-
1
Maximum
(1)
Notes:
a EPCs calculated if "Yes" for "Include Constituent as a COPC?" on Table C-1.
b Number of nondetect results that exceeded the maximum detected concentration. These results were not included in the statistical calculations.
c The arithmetic mean for datasets with nondetected results is calculated using the KM method.
d Tested using the Shapiro-Wilk W or Lilliefors test for normal and lognormal distributions and the Anderson-Darling and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests for gamma
distributions. A 5 percent level of significance was used in all tests. Distribution tests were conducted only for samples with at least four detected results.
Distributions not confirmed as N, LN, or G were treated as NP in all statistical calculations.
8 The EPC is the lesser of the UCL95 (or UCL99) and the maximum detected concentration. The maximum detected concentration is the default when there are
fewer than 10 samples or fewer than four detected results. See Appendix D of USEPA (2024b).
Page 12 of 13
-------
Table C-4. Exposure Point Concentrations for Human Health Risk Assessment
Notes (continued):
f The statistical methods for selecting the exposure point concentration are as follows (not all are used):
(1)
Maximum detected concentration
(7)
95%
Gamma Approximate KM-UCL
(13)
(2)
95% Student's t UCL
(8)
95%
H-UCL
(14)
(3)
95% KM (t) UCL
(9)
95%
H-UCL (KM log)
(15)
(4)
95% Adjusted Gamma UCL
(10)
95%
Bootstrap-t UCL
(16)
(5)
95% Gamma Adjusted KM-UCL
(11)
95%
KM Bootstrap-t UCL
(17)
(6)
95% Approximate Gamma UCL
(12)
95%
BCAUCL
95% KM BCAUCL
95% Percentile Bootstrap UCL
95% KM Percentile Bootstrap UCL
99% Bootstrap-t UCL
99% KM Percentile Bootstrap UCL
Not applicable
BCA Bias-corrected accelerated bootstrap method
bgs Below ground surface
COPC Contaminant of potential concern
EPC Exposure point concentration
G (data qualifier) Sample density differs by more than 15% of the LCS density.
G (distribution) Gamma distribution
H-UCL UCL based upon Land's H-statistic
J Estimated concentration
Kerr-McGee Kerr-McGee Corporation
KM Kaplan-Meier
LN Lognormal distribution
M3 The requested MDC was not met, but the reported activity is greater than the reported MDC
mg/kg Milligram per kilogram
N Normal distribution
ND Nondetect
NP Nonparametric distribution
pCi/g Picocurie per gram
UCL Upper confidence limit
UCL95 95 percent upper confidence limit
UCL99 99 percent upper confidence limit
USEPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Reference:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2024b. "Navajo Abandoned Uranium Mines Risk Assessment Methodology." Draft Final. March.
Page 13 of 13
-------
Table C-5.1. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Quivira Church Rock Mine No. 1
Church Rock Mine No. 1 - Kee'da'whii teeh (Full-Time Resident)
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer
Intake0
Units
Slope
Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk6
Adult
Noncancer
Intake0
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Child
Noncancer
Intake0
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Child
Exposure Medium: Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs
Exposure Route: Incidental Soil Ingestion
Uranium-238
1.1
pCi/g
1.0E+04
pCi/g
1.3E-10
risk/pCi/g
1.4E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
1.2
pCi/g
1.1E+04
pCi/g
1.5E-10
risk/pCi/g
1.7E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
1.7
pCi/g
1.6E+04
pCi/g
1.7E-10
risk/pCi/g
2.7E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
6.7
pCi/g
6.4E+04
pCi/g
5.7E-09
risk/pCi/g
3.6E-04
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
4E-04
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
4,600
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.0E-02
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.020
1.2E-01
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.12
Arsenic
4.9
mg/kg
1.8E-05
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
2.6E-05
1.3E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.042
7.4E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.25
Barium
110
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
4.7E-04
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.0024
2.9E-03
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.014
Cadmium
0.14
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
6.0E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0060
3.6E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.036
Chromium
6.0
mg/kg
9.62E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
4.8E-05
2.6E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0086
1.6E-04
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.052
Cobalt
6.1
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.6E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.087
1.6E-04
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.53
Copper
12
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
5.2E-05
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0013
3.1E-04
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0078
Iron
11,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
4.7E-02
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.068
2.9E-01
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.41
Manganese
160
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
6.9E-04
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.029
4.2E-03
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.17
Molybdenum
0.32
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.4E-06
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.00028
8.3E-06
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0017
Selenium
3.4
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.5E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0029
8.8E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.018
Thallium
0.14
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
6.0E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.060
3.6E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.36
Uranium
7.3
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.1E-05
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.16
1.9E-04
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.95
Vanadium
14
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
6.0E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.012
3.6E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.073
Metals Cancer Total
7E-05
Metals Noncancer Total
0.5
Metals Noncancer Total
3
Exposure Route Cancer Total
4E-04
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.5
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
3
Page 1 of 11
-------
Table C-5.1. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Quivira Church Rock Mine No. 1
Church Rock Mine No. 1 - Kee'da'whii teeh (Full-Time Resident)
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer
Intake0
Units
Slope
Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk6
Adult
Noncancer
Intake0
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Child
Noncancer
Intake0
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Child
Exposure Medium: Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs
Exposure Route: External Ex
posure
Uranium-238
1.1
pCi/g
5.6E+01
pCi/g
1.2E-10
risk/year pCi/g
7.0E-09
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
1.2
pCi/g
6.1E+01
pCi/g
2.5E-10
risk/year pCi/g
1.5E-08
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
1.7
pCi/g
8.7E+01
pCi/g
8.5E-10
risk/year pCi/g
7.3E-08
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
6.7
pCi/g
3.4E+02
pCi/g
8.4E-06
risk/year pCi/g
2.9E-03
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
3E-03
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route Cancer Total
3E-03
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route: Dermal Exposure
Aluminum
4,600
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
—
Arsenic
4.9
mg/kg
1.0E-06
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
1.5E-06
7.4E-07
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0025
4.5E-06
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.015
Barium
110
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Cadmium
0.14
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.8E-08
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.00028
1.7E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0017
Chromium
6.0
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Cobalt
6.1
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Copper
12
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Iron
11,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Manganese
160
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Molybdenum
0.32
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Selenium
3.4
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Thallium
0.14
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
—
Uranium
7.3
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Vanadium
14
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Metals Cancer Total
2E-06
Metals Noncancer Total
0.003
Metals Noncancer Total
0.02
Exposure Route Cancer Total
2E-06
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.003
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.02
Page 2 of 11
-------
Table C-5.1. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Quivira Church Rock Mine No. 1
Church Rock Mine No. 1 - Kee'da'whii teeh (Full-Time Resident)
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer
Intake0
Units
Slope
Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk6
Adult
Noncancer
Intake0
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Child
Noncancer
Intake0
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Child
Exposure Medium: Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs
Exposure Route: Inhalation of Particulates
Uranium-238
1.1
pCi/g
9.6E-02
pCi
2.4E-08
risk/pCi
2.3E-09
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
1.2
pCi/g
1.0E-01
pCi
2.8E-08
risk/pCi
2.9E-09
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
1.7
pCi/g
1.5E-01
pCi
3.4E-08
risk/pCi
5.0E-09
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
6.7
pCi/g
5.8E-01
pCi
5.9E-08
risk/pCi
3.5E-08
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
4E-08
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
4,600
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3y1
—
6.0E-07
mg/m3
5.0E-03
mg/m3
0.00012
6.0E-07
mg/m3
5.0E-03
mg/m3
0.00012
Arsenic
4.9
mg/kg
6.4E-07
ug/m3
4.3E-03
(ug/m3y1
2.7E-09
6.4E-10
mg/m3
1.5E-05
mg/m3
0.000042
6.4E-10
mg/m3
1.5E-05
mg/m3
0.000042
Barium
110
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
1.4E-08
mg/m3
5.0E-04
mg/m3
0.000029
1.4E-08
mg/m3
5.0E-04
mg/m3
0.000029
Cadmium
0.14
mg/kg
1.8E-08
ug/m3
1.8E-03
(ug/m3)"1
3.3E-11
1.8E-11
mg/m3
1.0E-05
mg/m3
0.0000018
1.8E-11
mg/m3
1.0E-05
mg/m3
0.0000018
Chromium
6.0
mg/kg
1.3E-06
ug/m3
8.4E-02
(ug/m3)"1
1.1E-07
7.8E-10
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.0000078
7.8E-10
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.0000078
Cobalt
6.1
mg/kg
7.9E-07
ug/m3
9.0E-03
(ug/m3)"1
7.1E-09
7.9E-10
mg/m3
6.0E-06
mg/m3
0.00013
7.9E-10
mg/m3
6.0E-06
mg/m3
0.00013
Copper
12
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Iron
11,000
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Manganese
160
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
2.1E-08
mg/m3
5.0E-05
mg/m3
0.00042
2.1E-08
mg/m3
5.0E-05
mg/m3
0.00042
Molybdenum
0.32
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
4.2E-11
mg/m3
2.0E-03
mg/m3
0.000000021
4.2E-11
mg/m3
2.0E-03
mg/m3
0.000000021
Selenium
3.4
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
4.4E-10
mg/m3
2.0E-02
mg/m3
0.000000022
4.4E-10
mg/m3
2.0E-02
mg/m3
0.000000022
Thallium
0.14
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Uranium
7.3
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
9.5E-10
mg/m3
4.0E-05
mg/m3
0.000024
9.5E-10
mg/m3
4.0E-05
mg/m3
0.000024
Vanadium
14
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
1.8E-09
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.000018
1.8E-09
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.000018
Metals Cancer Total
1E-07
Metals Noncancer Total
0.0008
Metals Noncancer Total
0.0008
Exposure Route Cancer Total
2E-07
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.0008
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.0008
Exposure Medium: Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Plant Consumption
Uranium-238
1.1
pCi/g
7.8E+04
pCi/g
8.7E-11
risk/pCi/g
6.8E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
1.2
pCi/g
8.5E+04
pCi/g
9.6E-11
risk/pCi/g
8.1E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
1.7
pCi/g
3.1E+04
pCi/g
1.2E-10
risk/pCi/g
3.6E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
6.7
pCi/g
7.4E+05
pCi/g
3.7E-09
risk/pCi/g
2.7E-03
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
3E-03
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
4,600
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
5.5E-02
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.055
1.4E-01
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.14
Arsenic
4.9
mg/kg
6.9E-05
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
1.0E-04
6.4E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.21
1.7E-04
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.56
Barium
110
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.5E-03
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.013
6.7E-03
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.034
Cadmium
0.14
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
8.3E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.083
2.2E-05
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.22
Chromium
6.0
mg/kg
1.68E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
8.4E-05
7.2E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.024
1.9E-04
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.064
Cobalt
6.1
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.1E-04
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.37
2.9E-04
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.98
Copper
12
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.0E-03
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.051
5.4E-03
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.14
Iron
11,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
--
1.3E-01
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.19
3.4E-01
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.49
Manganese
160
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.8E-02
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.73
4.6E-02
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
1.9
Molybdenum
0.32
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.5E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0070
9.3E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.019
Selenium
3.4
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
6.1E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.012
1.6E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.033
Thallium
0.14
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.4E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.14
3.9E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.39
Uranium
7.3
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
9.5E-05
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.47
2.6E-04
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
1.3
Vanadium
14
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.7E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.034
4.6E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.092
Metals Cancer Total
2E-04
Metals Noncancer Total
2
Metals Noncancer Total
6
Exposure Route Cancer Total
3E-03
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
2
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
6
Page 3 of 11
-------
Table C-5.1. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Quivira Church Rock Mine No. 1
Church Rock Mine No. 1 - Kee'da'whii teeh (Full-Time Resident)
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer
Intake0
Units
Slope
Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk6
Adult
Noncancer
Intake0
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Child
Noncancer
Intake0
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Child
Exposure Medium: Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs
Exposure Route: Animal Consumption
Uranium-238
1.1
pCi/g
8.9E+04
pCi/g
8.7E-11
risk/pCi/g
7.7E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
1.2
pCi/g
9.7E+04
pCi/g
9.6E-11
risk/pCi/g
9.3E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
1.7
pCi/g
6.6E+01
pCi/g
1.2E-10
risk/pCi/g
7.9E-09
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
6.7
pCi/g
1.4E+06
pCi/g
3.7E-09
risk/pCi/g
5.2E-03
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
5E-03
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
4,600
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.2E-03
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.0032
8.7E-03
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.0087
Arsenic
4.9
mg/kg
5.4E-06
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
8.1E-06
4.8E-06
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.016
1.3E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.042
Barium
110
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.4E-05
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.000072
3.9E-05
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.00019
Cadmium
0.14
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.2E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0032
8.4E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0084
Chromium
6.0
mg/kg
3.68E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
1.8E-05
1.6E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0053
4.2E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.014
Cobalt
6.1
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
5.9E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.20
1.6E-04
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.53
Copper
12
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.1E-04
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0027
2.9E-04
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0072
Iron
11,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.0E-01
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.14
2.6E-01
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.38
Manganese
160
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
5.3E-05
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0022
1.4E-04
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0059
Molybdenum
0.32
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.4E-06
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.00029
3.8E-06
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.00077
Selenium
3.4
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.6E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.052
7.1E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.14
Thallium
0.14
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.5E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.25
6.9E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.69
Uranium
7.3
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.0E-06
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0051
2.8E-06
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.014
Vanadium
14
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.5E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0031
4.2E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0084
Metals Cancer Total
3E-05
Metals Noncancer Total
0.7
Metals Noncancer Total
2
Exposure Route Cancer Total
5E-03
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.7
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
2
Exposure Medium: Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Other Dine Lifeways Plant Ingestion
Uranium-238
1.1
pCi/g
3.6E+04
pCi/g
8.7E-11
risk/pCi/g
3.1E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
1.2
pCi/g
4.0E+04
pCi/g
9.6E-11
risk/pCi/g
3.8E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
1.7
pCi/g
1.7E+04
pCi/g
1.2E-10
risk/pCi/g
2.0E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
6.7
pCi/g
4.0E+05
pCi/g
3.7E-09
risk/pCi/g
1.5E-03
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
1E-03
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
4,600
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.3E-02
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.033
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
—
Arsenic
4.9
mg/kg
3.5E-05
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
5.2E-05
3.8E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.13
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Barium
110
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.7E-03
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.0083
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Cadmium
0.14
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
5.6E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.056
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Chromium
6.0
mg/kg
5.2E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
2.6E-05
4.4E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.015
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Cobalt
6.1
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
6.7E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.22
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Copper
12
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.3E-03
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.033
—
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Iron
11,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
--
7.8E-02
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.11
—
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Manganese
160
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.2E-02
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.49
—
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Molybdenum
0.32
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.3E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0047
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Selenium
3.4
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.7E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0075
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Thallium
0.14
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
8.8E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.088
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
—
Uranium
7.3
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
6.1E-05
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.30
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Vanadium
14
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.1E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.021
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Metals Cancer Total
8E-05
Metals Noncancer Total
2
Metals Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route Cancer Total
2E-03
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
2
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
-
Page 4 of 11
-------
Table C-5.1. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Quivira Church Rock Mine No. 1
Church Rock Mine No. 1 - Kee'da'whii teeh (Full-Time Resident)
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer
Intake0
Units
Slope
Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk6
Adult
Noncancer
Intake0
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Child
Noncancer
Intake0
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Child
Exposure Medium: Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs
Exposure Route: Other Dine Lifeways Plant Dermal
Aluminum
4,600
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
—
Arsenic
4.9
mg/kg
2.9E-06
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
4.4E-06
3.2E-06
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.011
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Barium
110
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Cadmium
0.14
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
6.2E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0062
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Chromium
6.0
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Cobalt
6.1
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Copper
12
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Iron
11,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Manganese
160
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Molybdenum
0.32
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Selenium
3.4
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Thallium
0.14
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
—
Uranium
7.3
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Vanadium
14
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Metals Cancer Total
4E-06
Metals Noncancer Total
0.02
Metals Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route Cancer Total
4E-06
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.02
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Medium: Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Other Dine Lifeways Plant Inhalation
Uranium-238
1.1
pCi/g
2.5E+02
pCi
2.4E-08
risk/pCi
6.0E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
1.2
pCi/g
2.8E+02
pCi
2.8E-08
risk/pCi
7.7E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
1.7
pCi/g
7.7E+01
pCi
3.4E-08
risk/pCi
2.6E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
6.7
pCi/g
4.2E+03
pCi
5.9E-08
risk/pCi
2.5E-04
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
3E-04
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
4,600
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
3.3E-04
mg/m3
5.0E-03
mg/m3
0.066
—
mg/m3
5.0E-03
mg/m3
—
Arsenic
4.9
mg/kg
3.5E-04
ug/m3
4.3E-03
(ug/m3)"1
1.5E-06
3.9E-07
mg/m3
1.5E-05
mg/m3
0.026
—
mg/m3
1.5E-05
mg/m3
—
Barium
110
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
1.7E-05
mg/m3
5.0E-04
mg/m3
0.033
—
mg/m3
5.0E-04
mg/m3
—
Cadmium
0.14
mg/kg
5.2E-05
ug/m3
1.8E-03
(ug/m3)"1
9.3E-08
5.6E-08
mg/m3
1.0E-05
mg/m3
0.0056
—
mg/m3
1.0E-05
mg/m3
—
Chromium
6.0
mg/kg
5.3E-04
ug/m3
8.4E-02
(ug/m3)"1
4.5E-05
8.9E-08
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.00089
—
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
—
Cobalt
6.1
mg/kg
6.7E-04
ug/m3
9.0E-03
(ug/m3)"1
6.0E-06
7.3E-07
mg/m3
6.0E-06
mg/m3
0.12
—
mg/m3
6.0E-06
mg/m3
—
Copper
12
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Iron
11,000
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Manganese
160
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
1.2E-04
mg/m3
5.0E-05
mg/m3
2.3
—
mg/m3
5.0E-05
mg/m3
—
Molybdenum
0.32
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
2.3E-07
mg/m3
2.0E-03
mg/m3
0.00012
—
mg/m3
2.0E-03
mg/m3
—
Selenium
3.4
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
3.7E-07
mg/m3
2.0E-02
mg/m3
0.000019
—
mg/m3
2.0E-02
mg/m3
—
Thallium
0.14
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Uranium
7.3
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
6.2E-07
mg/m3
4.0E-05
mg/m3
0.016
—
mg/m3
4.0E-05
mg/m3
—
Vanadium
14
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
1.1E-06
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.011
—
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
—
Metals Cancer Total
5E-05
Metals Noncancer Total
3
Metals Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route Cancer Total
3E-04
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
3
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
—
Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs) Receptor Cancer Risk Total
1E-02
Receptor/Media Noncancer Hazard Total
8
Receptor/Media Noncancer Hazard Total
10
Page 5 of 11
-------
Table C-5.1. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Quivira Church Rock Mine No. 1
Church Rock Mine No. 1 - Kee'da'whii teeh (Full-Time Resident)
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer
Intake0
Units
Slope
Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk6
Adult
Noncancer
Intake0
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Child
Noncancer
Intake0
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Child
Exposure Medium: Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Incidental Soil Ingestion
Uranium-238
1.1
pCi/g
1.0E+04
pCi/g
1.3E-10
risk/pCi/g
1.4E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
1.2
pCi/g
1.1E+04
pCi/g
1.5E-10
risk/pCi/g
1.7E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
1.7
pCi/g
1.6E+04
pCi/g
1.7E-10
risk/pCi/g
2.7E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
17
pCi/g
1.6E+05
pCi/g
5.7E-09
risk/pCi/g
9.2E-04
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
9E-04
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
4,600
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.0E-02
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.020
1.2E-01
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.12
Arsenic
4.8
mg/kg
1.7E-05
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
2.6E-05
1.2E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.042
7.2E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.24
Barium
110
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
4.7E-04
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.0024
2.9E-03
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.014
Cadmium
0.14
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
6.0E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0060
3.6E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.036
Chromium
6.00
mg/kg
9.62E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
4.8E-05
2.6E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0086
1.6E-04
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.052
Cobalt
6.1
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.6E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.087
1.6E-04
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.53
Copper
12
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
5.2E-05
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0013
3.1E-04
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0078
Iron
11,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
4.7E-02
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.068
2.9E-01
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.41
Manganese
160
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
6.9E-04
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.029
4.2E-03
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.17
Molybdenum
0.32
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.4E-06
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.00028
8.3E-06
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0017
Selenium
3.1
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.3E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0027
8.1E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.016
Thallium
0.14
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
6.0E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.060
3.6E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.36
Uranium
7.3
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.1E-05
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.16
1.9E-04
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.95
Vanadium
14
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
6.0E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.012
3.6E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.073
Metals Cancer Total
7E-05
Metals Noncancer Total
0.5
Metals Noncancer Total
3
Exposure Route Cancer Total
1E-03
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.5
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
3
Page 6 of 11
-------
Table C-5.1. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Quivira Church Rock Mine No. 1
Church Rock Mine No. 1 - Kee'da'whii teeh (Full-Time Resident)
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer
Intake0
Units
Slope
Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk6
Adult
Noncancer
Intake0
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Child
Noncancer
Intake0
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Child
Exposure Medium: Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: External Ex
posure
Uranium-238
1.1
pCi/g
5.6E+01
pCi/g
1.2E-10
risk/year pCi/g
7.0E-09
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
1.2
pCi/g
6.1E+01
pCi/g
2.5E-10
risk/year pCi/g
1.5E-08
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
1.7
pCi/g
8.7E+01
pCi/g
8.5E-10
risk/year pCi/g
7.3E-08
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
17
pCi/g
8.7E+02
pCi/g
8.4E-06
risk/year pCi/g
7.3E-03
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
7E-03
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route Cancer Total
7E-03
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route: Dermal Exposure
Aluminum
4,600
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
—
Arsenic
4.8
mg/kg
1.0E-06
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
1.5E-06
7.2E-07
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0024
4.4E-06
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.015
Barium
110
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Cadmium
0.14
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.8E-08
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.00028
1.7E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0017
Chromium
6.0
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Cobalt
6.1
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Copper
12
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Iron
11,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Manganese
160
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Molybdenum
0.32
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Selenium
3.1
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Thallium
0.14
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
—
Uranium
7.3
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Vanadium
14
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Metals Cancer Total
2E-06
Metals Noncancer Total
0.003
Metals Noncancer Total
0.02
Exposure Route Cancer Total
2E-06
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.003
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.02
Page 7 of 11
-------
Table C-5.1. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Quivira Church Rock Mine No. 1
Church Rock Mine No. 1 - Kee'da'whii teeh (Full-Time Resident)
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer
Intake0
Units
Slope
Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk6
Adult
Noncancer
Intake0
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Child
Noncancer
Intake0
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Child
Exposure Medium: Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Inhalation of Particulates
Uranium-238
1.1
pCi/g
9.6E-02
pCi
2.4E-08
risk/pCi
2.3E-09
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
1.2
pCi/g
1.0E-01
pCi
2.8E-08
risk/pCi
2.9E-09
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
1.7
pCi/g
1.5E-01
pCi
3.4E-08
risk/pCi
5.0E-09
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
17
pCi/g
1.5E+00
pCi
5.9E-08
risk/pCi
8.8E-08
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
1E-07
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
4,600
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3y1
—
6.0E-07
mg/m3
5.0E-03
mg/m3
0.00012
6.0E-07
mg/m3
5.0E-03
mg/m3
0.00012
Arsenic
4.8
mg/kg
6.2E-07
ug/m3
4.3E-03
(ug/m3y1
2.7E-09
6.2E-10
mg/m3
1.5E-05
mg/m3
0.000042
6.2E-10
mg/m3
1.5E-05
mg/m3
0.000042
Barium
110
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
1.4E-08
mg/m3
5.0E-04
mg/m3
0.00003
1.4E-08
mg/m3
5.0E-04
mg/m3
0.00003
Cadmium
0.14
mg/kg
1.8E-08
ug/m3
1.8E-03
(ug/m3)"1
3.3E-11
1.8E-11
mg/m3
1.0E-05
mg/m3
0.0000018
1.8E-11
mg/m3
1.0E-05
mg/m3
0.0000018
Chromium
6.0
mg/kg
1.3E-06
ug/m3
8.4E-02
(ug/m3)"1
1.1E-07
7.8E-10
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.0000078
7.8E-10
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.0000078
Cobalt
6.1
mg/kg
7.9E-07
ug/m3
9.0E-03
(ug/m3)"1
7.1E-09
7.9E-10
mg/m3
6.0E-06
mg/m3
0.00013
7.9E-10
mg/m3
6.0E-06
mg/m3
0.00013
Copper
12
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Iron
11,000
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Manganese
160
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
2.1E-08
mg/m3
5.0E-05
mg/m3
0.00042
2.1E-08
mg/m3
5.0E-05
mg/m3
0.00042
Molybdenum
0.32
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
4.2E-11
mg/m3
2.0E-03
mg/m3
0.000000021
4.2E-11
mg/m3
2.0E-03
mg/m3
0.000000021
Selenium
3.1
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
4.0E-10
mg/m3
2.0E-02
mg/m3
0.000000020
4.0E-10
mg/m3
2.0E-02
mg/m3
0.000000020
Thallium
0.14
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Uranium
7.3
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
9.5E-10
mg/m3
4.0E-05
mg/m3
0.000024
9.5E-10
mg/m3
4.0E-05
mg/m3
0.000024
Vanadium
14
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
1.8E-09
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.000018
1.8E-09
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.000018
Metals Cancer Total
1E-07
Metals Noncancer Total
0.0008
Metals Noncancer Total
0.001
Exposure Route Cancer Total
2E-07
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.0008
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.001
Exposure Medium: Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Plant Consumption
Uranium-238
1.1
pCi/g
7.8E+04
pCi/g
8.7E-11
risk/pCi/g
6.8E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
1.2
pCi/g
8.5E+04
pCi/g
9.6E-11
risk/pCi/g
8.1E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
1.7
pCi/g
3.1E+04
pCi/g
1.2E-10
risk/pCi/g
3.6E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
17
pCi/g
1.9E+06
pCi/g
3.7E-09
risk/pCi/g
6.9E-03
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
7E-03
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
4,600
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
5.5E-02
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.055
1.4E-01
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.14
Arsenic
4.8
mg/kg
6.7E-05
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
1.0E-04
6.2E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.21
1.6E-04
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.54
Barium
110
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.5E-03
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.013
6.7E-03
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.034
Cadmium
0.14
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
8.3E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.083
2.2E-05
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.22
Cobalt
6.1
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.1E-04
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.37
2.9E-04
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.98
Chromium
6.0
mg/kg
1.7E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
8.4E-05
7.2E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.024
1.9E-04
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.064
Copper
12
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.0E-03
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.051
5.4E-03
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.14
Iron
11,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
--
1.3E-01
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.19
3.4E-01
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.49
Manganese
160
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.8E-02
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.73
4.6E-02
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
1.9
Molybdenum
0.32
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.5E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0070
9.3E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.019
Selenium
3.1
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
5.6E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.011
1.5E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.030
Thallium
0.14
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.4E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.14
3.9E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.39
Uranium
7.3
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
9.5E-05
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.47
2.6E-04
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
1.3
Vanadium
14
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.7E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.034
4.6E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.092
Metals Cancer Total
2E-04
Metals Noncancer Total
2
Metals Noncancer Total
6
Exposure Route Cancer Total
7E-03
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
2
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
6
Page 8 of 11
-------
Table C-5.1. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Quivira Church Rock Mine No. 1
Church Rock Mine No. 1 - Kee'da'whii teeh (Full-Time Resident)
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer
Intake0
Units
Slope
Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk6
Adult
Noncancer
Intake0
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Child
Noncancer
Intake0
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Child
Exposure Medium: Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Animal Consumption
Uranium-238
1.1
pCi/g
8.9E+04
pCi/g
8.7E-11
risk/pCi/g
7.7E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
1.2
pCi/g
9.7E+04
pCi/g
9.6E-11
risk/pCi/g
9.3E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
1.7
pCi/g
6.6E+01
pCi/g
1.2E-10
risk/pCi/g
7.9E-09
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
17
pCi/g
3.6E+06
pCi/g
3.7E-09
risk/pCi/g
1.3E-02
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
1E-02
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
4,600
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.2E-03
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.0032
8.7E-03
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.0087
Arsenic
4.8
mg/kg
5.3E-06
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
7.9E-06
4.7E-06
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.016
1.2E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.042
Barium
110
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.4E-05
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.000072
3.9E-05
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.00019
Cadmium
0.14
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.2E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0032
8.4E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0084
Chromium
6.0
mg/kg
3.7E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
1.8E-05
1.6E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0053
4.2E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0141
Cobalt
6.1
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
5.9E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.20
1.6E-04
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.53
Copper
12
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.1E-04
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0027
2.9E-04
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0072
Iron
11,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.0E-01
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.14
2.6E-01
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.38
Manganese
160
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
5.3E-05
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0022
1.4E-04
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0059
Molybdenum
0.32
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.4E-06
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.00029
3.8E-06
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.00077
Selenium
3.1
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.4E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.048
6.5E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.13
Thallium
0.14
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.5E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.25
6.9E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.69
Uranium
7.3
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.0E-06
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0051
2.8E-06
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.014
Vanadium
14
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.5E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0031
4.2E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0084
Metals Cancer Total
3E-05
Metals Noncancer Total
0.7
Metals Noncancer Total
2
Exposure Route Cancer Total
1E-02
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.7
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
2
Exposure Medium: Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Other Dine Lifeways Plant Ingestion
Uranium-238
1.1
pCi/g
3.6E+04
pCi/g
8.7E-11
risk/pCi/g
3.1E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
1.2
pCi/g
4.0E+04
pCi/g
9.6E-11
risk/pCi/g
3.8E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
1.7
pCi/g
1.7E+04
pCi/g
1.2E-10
risk/pCi/g
2.0E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
17
pCi/g
1.0E+06
pCi/g
3.7E-09
risk/pCi/g
3.8E-03
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
4E-03
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
4,600
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.3E-02
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.033
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
—
Arsenic
4.8
mg/kg
3.4E-05
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
5.1E-05
3.7E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.12
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Barium
110
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.7E-03
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.0083
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Cadmium
0.14
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
5.6E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.056
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Chromium
6.0
mg/kg
5.2E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
2.6E-05
4.4E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.015
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Cobalt
6.1
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
6.7E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.22
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Copper
12
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.3E-03
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.033
—
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Iron
11,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
--
7.8E-02
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.11
—
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Manganese
160
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.2E-02
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.49
—
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Molybdenum
0.32
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.3E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0047
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Selenium
3.1
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.4E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0068
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Thallium
0.14
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
8.8E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.088
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
—
Uranium
7.3
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
6.1E-05
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.30
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Vanadium
14
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.1E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.021
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Metals Cancer Total
8E-05
Metals Noncancer Total
2
Metals Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route Cancer Total
4E-03
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
2
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
-
Page 9 of 11
-------
Table C-5.1. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Quivira Church Rock Mine No. 1
Church Rock Mine No. 1 - Kee'da'whii teeh (Full-Time Resident)
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer
Intake0
Units
Slope
Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk6
Adult
Noncancer
Intake0
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Child
Noncancer
Intake0
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Child
Exposure Medium: Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Other Dine Lifeways Plant Dermal
Aluminum
4,600
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
—
Arsenic
4.8
mg/kg
2.9E-06
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
4.3E-06
3.1E-06
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.010
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Barium
110
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Cadmium
0.14
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
6.2E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0062
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Chromium
6.0
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Cobalt
6.1
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Copper
12
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Iron
11,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Manganese
160
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Molybdenum
0.32
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Selenium
3.1
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Thallium
0.14
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
—
Uranium
7.3
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Vanadium
14
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Metals Cancer Total
4E-06
Metals Noncancer Total
0.02
Metals Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route Cancer Total
4E-06
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.02
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Medium: Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Other Dine Lifeways Plant Inhalation
Uranium-238
1.1
pCi/g
2.5E+02
pCi
2.4E-08
risk/pCi
6.0E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
1.2
pCi/g
2.8E+02
pCi
2.8E-08
risk/pCi
7.7E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
1.7
pCi/g
7.7E+01
pCi
3.4E-08
risk/pCi
2.6E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
17
pCi/g
1.1E+04
pCi
5.9E-08
risk/pCi
6.3E-04
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
7E-04
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
4,600
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
3.3E-04
mg/m3
5.0E-03
mg/m3
0.066
—
mg/m3
5.0E-03
mg/m3
—
Arsenic
4.8
mg/kg
3.5E-04
ug/m3
4.3E-03
(ug/m3)"1
1.5E-06
3.8E-07
mg/m3
1.5E-05
mg/m3
0.025
—
mg/m3
1.5E-05
mg/m3
—
Barium
110
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
1.7E-05
mg/m3
5.0E-04
mg/m3
0.033
—
mg/m3
5.0E-04
mg/m3
—
Cadmium
0.14
mg/kg
5.2E-05
ug/m3
1.8E-03
(ug/m3)"1
9.3E-08
5.6E-08
mg/m3
1.0E-05
mg/m3
0.0056
—
mg/m3
1.0E-05
mg/m3
—
Chromium
6.0
mg/kg
5.3E-04
ug/m3
8.4E-02
(ug/m3)"1
4.5E-05
8.9E-08
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.00089
—
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
—
Cobalt
6.1
mg/kg
6.7E-04
ug/m3
9.0E-03
(ug/m3)"1
6.0E-06
7.3E-07
mg/m3
6.0E-06
mg/m3
0.12
—
mg/m3
6.0E-06
mg/m3
—
Copper
12
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Iron
11,000
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Manganese
160
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
1.2E-04
mg/m3
5.0E-05
mg/m3
2.3
—
mg/m3
5.0E-05
mg/m3
—
Molybdenum
0.32
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
2.3E-07
mg/m3
2.0E-03
mg/m3
0.00012
—
mg/m3
2.0E-03
mg/m3
—
Selenium
3.1
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
3.4E-07
mg/m3
2.0E-02
mg/m3
0.000017
—
mg/m3
2.0E-02
mg/m3
—
Thallium
0.14
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Uranium
7.3
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
6.2E-07
mg/m3
4.0E-05
mg/m3
0.016
—
mg/m3
4.0E-05
mg/m3
—
Vanadium
14
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
1.1E-06
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.011
—
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
—
Metals Cancer Total
5E-05
Metals Noncancer Total
o
O
Metals Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route Cancer Total
7E-04
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
3
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
—
Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs) Receptor Cancer Risk Total
3E-02
Receptor/Media Noncancer Hazard Total
8
Receptor/Media Noncancer Hazard Total
10
Page 10 of 11
-------
Table C-5.1. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Quivira Church Rock Mine No. 1
Notes:
a COPCs are the constituents of interest with a maximum detected concentration exceeding the COPC screening level (see Table C-1).
b EPCs are provided on Table C-4.
c The intakes are the EPC multiplied by the exposure parameters and any applicable contaminant-specific inputs (see Table C-3 for exposure inputs, Table 4 of the NAUM risk assessment methodology [USEPA 2024b] report for contaminant-specific inputs,
and Appendix B of the NAUM risk assessment methodology [USEPA 2024b] report for equations).
d The toxicity values are provided in Table 4 of the NAUM risk assessment methodology (USEPA 2024b).
e The cancer risk for each contaminant for each exposure pathway is calculated by multiplying the cancer intake value with the toxicity value as follows: For contaminant i: Risk, = Cancer Intake, x Toxicity Factor,
f The noncancer hazard for each contaminant for each exposure pathway is calculated by dividing the noncancer intake value by the toxicity value as follows: For contaminant i: Hazard, = Noncancer Intake, / Toxicity Factor,
-
Not applicable
|jg/m3
Microgram per cubic meter
bgs
Below ground surface
COPC
Contaminant of potential concern
EPC
Exposure point concentration
mg/kg
Milligram per kilogram
mg/kg-day
Milligram per kilogram per day
mg/m3
Milligram per cubic meter
NAUM
Navajo abandoned uranium mine
pCi
Picocurie
pCi/g
Picocurie per gram
RfC
Reference concentration
RfD
Reference dose
SE
Secular equilibrium
USEPA
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Reference:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2024b. "Navajo Abandoned Uranium Mines Risk Assessment Methodology." Draft Final. March.
Page 11 of 11
-------
Table C-5.2. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Quivira Church Rock Mine No. 1 East
Church Rock Mine No. 1 East - Kee'da'whii teeh (Full-Time Resident)
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer
lntakec
Units
Slope
Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk6
Adult
Noncancer
Intake3
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Child
Noncancer
lntakec
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Child
Exposure Medium: Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs
Exposure Route: Incidental Soil Ingestion
Uranium-238
1.3
pCi/g
1.2E+04
pCi/g
1.3E-10
risk/pCi/g
1.7E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
1.4
pCi/g
1.3E+04
pCi/g
1.5E-10
risk/pCi/g
2.0E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
3.6
pCi/g
3.4E+04
pCi/g
1.7E-10
risk/pCi/g
5.7E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
9.3
pCi/g
8.8E+04
pCi/g
5.7E-09
risk/pCi/g
5.0E-04
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
5E-04
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
6,300
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.7E-02
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.027
1.6E-01
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.16
Arsenic
6.6
mg/kg
2.4E-05
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
3.6E-05
1.7E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.057
9.9E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.33
Barium
160
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
6.9E-04
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.0034
4.2E-03
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.021
Cadmium
0.13
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
5.6E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0056
3.4E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.034
Chromium
10
mg/kg
1.60E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
8.0E-05
4.3E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.014
2.6E-04
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.087
Cobalt
6.9
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.0E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.099
1.8E-04
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.60
Copper
13
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
5.6E-05
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0014
3.4E-04
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0085
Iron
16,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
6.9E-02
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.098
4.2E-01
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.59
Manganese
200
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
8.6E-04
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.036
5.2E-03
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.22
Molybdenum
0.31
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.3E-06
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.00027
8.1E-06
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0016
Selenium
3.0
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.3E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0026
7.8E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.016
Thallium
0.16
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
6.9E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.069
4.2E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.42
Uranium
3.6
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.5E-05
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.08
9.4E-05
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.47
Vanadium
16
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
6.9E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.014
4.2E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.083
Metals Cancer Total
1E-04
Metals Noncancer Total
0.5
Metals Noncancer Total
3
Exposure Route Cancer Total
6E-04
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.5
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
3
Page 1 of 11
-------
Table C-5.2. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Quivira Church Rock Mine No. 1 East
Church Rock Mine No. 1 East - Kee'da'whii teeh (Full-Time Resident)
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer
lntakec
Units
Slope
Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk6
Adult
Noncancer
Intake3
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Child
Noncancer
lntakec
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Child
Exposure Medium: Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs
Exposure Route: External Exposure
Uranium-238
1.3
pCi/g
6.6E+01
pCi/g
1.2E-10
risk/year pCi/g
8.2E-09
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
1.4
pCi/g
7.1E+01
pCi/g
2.5E-10
risk/year pCi/g
1.8E-08
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
3.6
pCi/g
1.8E+02
pCi/g
8.5E-10
risk/year pCi/g
1.6E-07
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
9.3
pCi/g
4.7E+02
pCi/g
8.4E-06
risk/year pCi/g
4.0E-03
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
4E-03
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route Cancer Total
4E-03
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route: Dermal Exposure
Aluminum
6,300
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
—
Arsenic
6.6
mg/kg
1.4E-06
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
2.1E-06
9.9E-07
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0033
6.0E-06
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.020
Barium
160
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Cadmium
0.13
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.6E-08
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.00026
1.6E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0016
Chromium
10
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Cobalt
6.9
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Copper
13
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Iron
16,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Manganese
200
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Molybdenum
0.31
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Selenium
3.0
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Thallium
0.16
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
—
Uranium
3.6
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Vanadium
16
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Metals Cancer Total
2E-06
Metals Noncancer Total
0.004
Metals Noncancer Total
0.02
Exposure Route Cancer Total
2E-06
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.004
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.02
Page 2 of 11
-------
Table C-5.2. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Quivira Church Rock Mine No. 1 East
Church Rock Mine No. 1 East - Kee'da'whii teeh (Full-Time Resident)
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer
lntakec
Units
Slope
Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk6
Adult
Noncancer
Intake3
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Child
Noncancer
lntakec
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Child
Exposure Medium: Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs
Exposure Route: Inhalation of Particulates
Uranium-238
1.3
pCi/g
1.1E-01
pCi
2.4E-08
risk/pCi
2.7E-09
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
1.4
pCi/g
1.2E-01
pCi
2.8E-08
risk/pCi
3.4E-09
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
3.6
pCi/g
3.1E-01
pCi
3.4E-08
risk/pCi
1.1E-08
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
9.3
pCi/g
8.1E-01
pCi
5.9E-08
risk/pCi
4.8E-08
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
6E-08
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
6,300
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3y1
—
8.2E-07
mg/m3
5.0E-03
mg/m3
0.00016
8.2E-07
mg/m3
5.0E-03
mg/m3
0.00016
Arsenic
6.6
mg/kg
8.6E-07
ug/m3
4.3E-03
(ug/m3y1
3.7E-09
8.6E-10
mg/m3
1.5E-05
mg/m3
0.000057
8.6E-10
mg/m3
1.5E-05
mg/m3
0.000057
Barium
160
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
2.1E-08
mg/m3
5.0E-04
mg/m3
0.000042
2.1E-08
mg/m3
5.0E-04
mg/m3
0.000042
Cadmium
0.13
mg/kg
1.7E-08
ug/m3
1.8E-03
(ug/m3)"1
3.0E-11
1.7E-11
mg/m3
1.0E-05
mg/m3
0.0000017
1.7E-11
mg/m3
1.0E-05
mg/m3
0.0000017
Chromium
10
mg/kg
2.1E-06
ug/m3
8.4E-02
(ug/m3)"1
1.8E-07
1.3E-09
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.000013
1.3E-09
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.000013
Cobalt
6.9
mg/kg
9.0E-07
ug/m3
9.0E-03
(ug/m3)"1
8.1E-09
9.0E-10
mg/m3
6.0E-06
mg/m3
0.00015
9.0E-10
mg/m3
6.0E-06
mg/m3
0.00015
Copper
13
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Iron
16,000
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
-
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Manganese
200
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
2.6E-08
mg/m3
5.0E-05
mg/m3
0.00052
2.6E-08
mg/m3
5.0E-05
mg/m3
0.00052
Molybdenum
0.31
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
4.0E-11
mg/m3
2.0E-03
mg/m3
0.000000020
4.0E-11
mg/m3
2.0E-03
mg/m3
0.000000020
Selenium
3.0
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
3.9E-10
mg/m3
2.0E-02
mg/m3
0.000000020
3.9E-10
mg/m3
2.0E-02
mg/m3
0.000000020
Thallium
0.16
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
-
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Uranium
3.6
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
4.7E-10
mg/m3
4.0E-05
mg/m3
0.000012
4.7E-10
mg/m3
4.0E-05
mg/m3
0.000012
Vanadium
16
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
2.1E-09
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.000021
2.1E-09
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.000021
Metals Cancer Total
2E-07
Metals Noncancer Total
0.001
Metals Noncancer Total
0.001
Exposure Route Cancer Total
3E-07
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.001
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.001
Exposure Medium: Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Plant Consumption
Uranium-238
1.3
pCi/g
9.2E+04
pCi/g
8.7E-11
risk/pCi/g
8.0E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
1.4
pCi/g
9.9E+04
pCi/g
9.6E-11
risk/pCi/g
9.5E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
3.6
pCi/g
6.5E+04
pCi/g
1.2E-10
risk/pCi/g
7.7E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
9.3
pCi/g
1.0E+06
pCi/g
3.7E-09
risk/pCi/g
3.8E-03
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
4E-03
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
6,300
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
7.6E-02
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.076
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.20
Arsenic
6.6
mg/kg
9.2E-05
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
1.4E-04
8.6E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.29
2.2E-04
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.75
Barium
160
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.7E-03
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.018
9.8E-03
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.049
Cadmium
0.13
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
7.7E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.077
2.1E-05
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.21
Cobalt
6.9
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.2E-04
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.41
3.3E-04
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
1.1
Chromium
10
mg/kg
2.80E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
1.4E-04
1.2E-04
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.040
3.2E-04
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.11
Copper
13
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.2E-03
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.055
5.9E-03
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.15
Iron
16,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
--
1.9E-01
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.27
5.0E-01
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.71
Manganese
200
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.2E-02
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.92
5.8E-02
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
2.4
Molybdenum
0.31
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.4E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0068
9.0E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.018
Selenium
3.0
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
5.4E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.011
1.4E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.029
Thallium
0.16
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.6E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.16
4.5E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.45
Uranium
3.6
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
4.7E-05
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.23
1.3E-04
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.6
Vanadium
16
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.9E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.038
5.3E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.106
Metals Cancer Total
3E-04
Metals Noncancer Total
3
Metals Noncancer Total
7
Exposure Route Cancer Total
4E-03
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
3
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
7
Page 3 of 11
-------
Table C-5.2. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Quivira Church Rock Mine No. 1 East
Church Rock Mine No. 1 East - Kee'da'whii teeh (Full-Time Resident)
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer
lntakec
Units
Slope
Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk6
Adult
Noncancer
Intake3
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Child
Noncancer
lntakec
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Child
Exposure Medium: Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs
Exposure Route: Animal Consumption
Uranium-238
1.3
pCi/g
1.1E+05
pCi/g
8.7E-11
risk/pCi/g
9.1E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
1.4
pCi/g
1.1E+05
pCi/g
9.6E-11
risk/pCi/g
1.1E-05
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
3.6
pCi/g
1.4E+02
pCi/g
1.2E-10
risk/pCi/g
1.7E-08
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
9.3
pCi/g
2.0E+06
pCi/g
3.7E-09
risk/pCi/g
7.2E-03
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
7E-03
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
6,300
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
4.4E-03
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.0044
1.2E-02
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.012
Arsenic
6.6
mg/kg
7.3E-06
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
1.1E-05
6.5E-06
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.022
1.7E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.057
Barium
160
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.1E-05
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.000104
5.6E-05
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.00028
Cadmium
0.13
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.0E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0030
7.8E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0078
Cobalt
6.9
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
6.6E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.22
1.8E-04
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.60
Chromium
10
mg/kg
6.14E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
3.1E-05
2.6E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0088
7.0E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.023
Copper
13
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.2E-04
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0029
3.1E-04
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0078
Iron
16,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.5E-01
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.21
3.8E-01
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.55
Manganese
200
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
6.6E-05
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0028
1.8E-04
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0074
Molybdenum
0.31
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.4E-06
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.00028
3.7E-06
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.00074
Selenium
3.0
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.3E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.046
6.3E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.13
Thallium
0.16
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.9E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.29
7.8E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.78
Uranium
3.6
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
5.0E-07
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0025
1.4E-06
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0068
Vanadium
16
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.8E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0035
4.8E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0096
Metals Cancer Total
4E-05
Metals Noncancer Total
0.8
Metals Noncancer Total
2
Exposure Route Cancer Total
7E-03
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.8
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
2
Exposure Medium: Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Other Dine Lifeways Plant Ingestion
Uranium-238
1.3
pCi/g
4.3E+04
pCi/g
8.7E-11
risk/pCi/g
3.7E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
1.4
pCi/g
4.6E+04
pCi/g
9.6E-11
risk/pCi/g
4.4E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
3.6
pCi/g
3.5E+04
pCi/g
1.2E-10
risk/pCi/g
4.2E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
9.3
pCi/g
5.6E+05
pCi/g
3.7E-09
risk/pCi/g
2.1E-03
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
2E-03
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
6,300
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
4.5E-02
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.045
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
—
Arsenic
6.6
mg/kg
4.7E-05
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
7.0E-05
5.1E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.17
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Barium
160
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.4E-03
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.0120
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Cadmium
0.13
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
5.2E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.052
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Cobalt
6.9
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
7.6E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.25
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Chromium
10
mg/kg
8.7E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
4.4E-05
7.3E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.024
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Copper
13
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.4E-03
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.036
—
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Iron
16,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
--
1.1E-01
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.16
—
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Manganese
200
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.5E-02
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.61
—
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Molybdenum
0.31
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.3E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0045
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Selenium
3.0
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.3E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0066
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Thallium
0.16
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.0E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.101
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
—
Uranium
3.6
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.0E-05
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.15
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Vanadium
16
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.2E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.024
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Metals Cancer Total
1E-04
Metals Noncancer Total
2
Metals Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route Cancer Total
2E-03
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
2
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
-
Page 4 of 11
-------
Table C-5.2. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Quivira Church Rock Mine No. 1 East
Church Rock Mine No. 1 East - Kee'da'whii teeh (Full-Time Resident)
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer
lntakec
Units
Slope
Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk6
Adult
Noncancer
Intake3
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Child
Noncancer
lntakec
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Child
Exposure Medium: Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs
Exposure Route: Other Dine Lifeways Plant Dermal
Aluminum
6,300
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
—
Arsenic
6.6
mg/kg
4.0E-06
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
5.9E-06
4.3E-06
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.014
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Barium
160
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Cadmium
0.13
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
5.7E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0057
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Cobalt
6.9
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Chromium
10
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Copper
13
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Iron
16,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Manganese
200
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Molybdenum
0.31
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Selenium
3.0
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Thallium
0.16
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
—
Uranium
3.6
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Vanadium
16
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Metals Cancer Total
6E-06
Metals Noncancer Total
0.02
Metals Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route Cancer Total
6E-06
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.02
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Medium: Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Other Dine Lifeways Plant Inhalation
Uranium-238
1.3
pCi/g
3.0E+02
pCi
2.4E-08
risk/pCi
7.1E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
1.4
pCi/g
3.2E+02
pCi
2.8E-08
risk/pCi
9.0E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
3.6
pCi/g
1.6E+02
pCi
3.4E-08
risk/pCi
5.5E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
9.3
pCi/g
5.9E+03
pCi
5.9E-08
risk/pCi
3.5E-04
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
4E-04
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
6,300
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
4.5E-04
mg/m3
5.0E-03
mg/m3
0.091
—
mg/m3
5.0E-03
mg/m3
—
Arsenic
6.6
mg/kg
4.8E-04
ug/m3
4.3E-03
(ug/m3)"1
2.0E-06
5.2E-07
mg/m3
1.5E-05
mg/m3
0.035
—
mg/m3
1.5E-05
mg/m3
—
Barium
160
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
2.4E-05
mg/m3
5.0E-04
mg/m3
0.048
—
mg/m3
5.0E-04
mg/m3
—
Cadmium
0.13
mg/kg
4.8E-05
ug/m3
1.8E-03
(ug/m3)"1
8.7E-08
5.2E-08
mg/m3
1.0E-05
mg/m3
0.0052
—
mg/m3
1.0E-05
mg/m3
—
Chromium
10
mg/kg
8.9E-04
ug/m3
8.4E-02
(ug/m3)"1
7.5E-05
7.5E-07
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.0075
—
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
—
Cobalt
6.9
mg/kg
7.6E-04
ug/m3
9.0E-03
(ug/m3)"1
6.8E-06
8.3E-07
mg/m3
6.0E-06
mg/m3
0.14
—
mg/m3
6.0E-06
mg/m3
—
Copper
13
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Iron
16,000
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
-
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Manganese
200
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
1.5E-04
mg/m3
5.0E-05
mg/m3
2.9
—
mg/m3
5.0E-05
mg/m3
—
Molybdenum
0.31
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
2.3E-07
mg/m3
2.0E-03
mg/m3
0.00011
—
mg/m3
2.0E-03
mg/m3
—
Selenium
3.0
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
3.3E-07
mg/m3
2.0E-02
mg/m3
0.000017
—
mg/m3
2.0E-02
mg/m3
—
Thallium
0.16
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
-
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Uranium
3.6
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
3.1E-07
mg/m3
4.0E-05
mg/m3
0.008
—
mg/m3
4.0E-05
mg/m3
—
Vanadium
16
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
1.2E-06
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.012
—
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
—
Metals Cancer Total
8E-05
Metals Noncancer Total
3
Metals Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route Cancer Total
4E-04
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
3
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
—
Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs) Receptor Cancer Risk Total
2E-02
Receptor/Media Noncancer Hazard Total
9
Receptor/Media Noncancer Hazard Total
10
Page 5 of 11
-------
Table C-5.2. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Quivira Church Rock Mine No. 1 East
Church Rock Mine No. 1 East - Kee'da'whii teeh (Full-Time Resident)
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer
lntakec
Units
Slope
Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk6
Adult
Noncancer
Intake3
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Child
Noncancer
lntakec
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Child
Exposure Medium: Subsurface Soil
0-72 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Incidental Soil Ingestion
Uranium-238
1.3
pCi/g
1.2E+04
pCi/g
1.3E-10
risk/pCi/g
1.7E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
1.4
pCi/g
1.3E+04
pCi/g
1.5E-10
risk/pCi/g
2.0E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
3.6
pCi/g
3.4E+04
pCi/g
1.7E-10
risk/pCi/g
5.7E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
43
pCi/g
4.1E+05
pCi/g
5.7E-09
risk/pCi/g
2.3E-03
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
2E-03
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
6,300
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.7E-02
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.027
1.6E-01
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.16
Arsenic
6.3
mg/kg
2.3E-05
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
3.4E-05
1.6E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.055
9.5E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.32
Barium
160
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
6.9E-04
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.0034
4.2E-03
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.021
Cadmium
0.13
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
5.6E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0056
3.4E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.034
Chromium
10
mg/kg
1.60E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
8.0E-05
4.3E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.014
2.6E-04
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.087
Cobalt
6.9
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.0E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.099
1.8E-04
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.60
Copper
13
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
5.6E-05
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0014
3.4E-04
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0085
Iron
16,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
6.9E-02
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.098
4.2E-01
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.59
Manganese
200
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
8.6E-04
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.036
5.2E-03
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.22
Molybdenum
0.51
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.2E-06
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.00044
1.3E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0027
Selenium
5.4
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.3E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0046
1.4E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.028
Thallium
0.16
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
6.9E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.069
4.2E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.42
Uranium
42
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.8E-04
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.90
1.1E-03
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
5.5
Vanadium
18
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
7.7E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.015
4.7E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.094
Metals Cancer Total
1E-04
Metals Noncancer Total
1.3
Metals Noncancer Total
8
Exposure Route Cancer Total
2E-03
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
1.3
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
8
Page 6 of 11
-------
Table C-5.2. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Quivira Church Rock Mine No. 1 East
Church Rock Mine No. 1 East - Kee'da'whii teeh (Full-Time Resident)
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer
lntakec
Units
Slope
Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk6
Adult
Noncancer
Intake3
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Child
Noncancer
lntakec
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Child
Exposure Medium: Subsurface Soil
0-72 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: External Exposure
Uranium-238
1.3
pCi/g
6.6E+01
pCi/g
1.2E-10
risk/year pCi/g
8.2E-09
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
1.4
pCi/g
7.1E+01
pCi/g
2.5E-10
risk/year pCi/g
1.8E-08
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
3.6
pCi/g
1.8E+02
pCi/g
8.5E-10
risk/year pCi/g
1.6E-07
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
43
pCi/g
2.2E+03
pCi/g
8.4E-06
risk/year pCi/g
1.8E-02
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
2E-02
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route Cancer Total
2E-02
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route: Dermal Exposure
Aluminum
6,300
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
—
Arsenic
6.3
mg/kg
1.3E-06
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
2.0E-06
9.5E-07
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0032
5.7E-06
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.019
Barium
160
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Cadmium
0.13
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.6E-08
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.00026
1.6E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0016
Chromium
10
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Cobalt
6.9
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Copper
13
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Iron
16,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Manganese
200
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Molybdenum
0.51
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Selenium
5.4
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Thallium
0.16
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
—
Uranium
42
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Vanadium
18
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Metals Cancer Total
2E-06
Metals Noncancer Total
0.003
Metals Noncancer Total
0.02
Exposure Route Cancer Total
2E-06
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.003
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.02
Page 7 of 11
-------
Table C-5.2. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Quivira Church Rock Mine No. 1 East
Church Rock Mine No. 1 East - Kee'da'whii teeh (Full-Time Resident)
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer
lntakec
Units
Slope
Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk6
Adult
Noncancer
Intake3
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Child
Noncancer
lntakec
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Child
Exposure Medium: Subsurface Soil
0-72 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Inhalation of Particulates
Uranium-238
1.3
pCi/g
1.1E-01
pCi
2.4E-08
risk/pCi
2.7E-09
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
1.4
pCi/g
1.2E-01
pCi
2.8E-08
risk/pCi
3.4E-09
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
3.6
pCi/g
3.1E-01
pCi
3.4E-08
risk/pCi
1.1E-08
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
43
pCi/g
3.7E+00
pCi
5.9E-08
risk/pCi
2.2E-07
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
2E-07
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
6,300
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3y1
—
8.2E-07
mg/m3
5.0E-03
mg/m3
0.00016
8.2E-07
mg/m3
5.0E-03
mg/m3
0.00016
Arsenic
6.3
mg/kg
8.2E-07
ug/m3
4.3E-03
(ug/m3y1
3.5E-09
8.2E-10
mg/m3
1.5E-05
mg/m3
0.000055
8.2E-10
mg/m3
1.5E-05
mg/m3
0.000055
Barium
160
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
2.1E-08
mg/m3
5.0E-04
mg/m3
0.00004
2.1E-08
mg/m3
5.0E-04
mg/m3
0.000042
Cadmium
0.13
mg/kg
1.7E-08
ug/m3
1.8E-03
(ug/m3)"1
3.0E-11
1.7E-11
mg/m3
1.0E-05
mg/m3
0.0000017
1.7E-11
mg/m3
1.0E-05
mg/m3
0.0000017
Chromium
10
mg/kg
2.1E-06
ug/m3
8.4E-02
(ug/m3)"1
1.8E-07
1.3E-09
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.000013
1.3E-09
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.000013
Cobalt
6.9
mg/kg
9.0E-07
ug/m3
9.0E-03
(ug/m3)"1
8.1E-09
9.0E-10
mg/m3
6.0E-06
mg/m3
0.00015
9.0E-10
mg/m3
6.0E-06
mg/m3
0.00015
Copper
13
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Iron
16,000
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
-
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Manganese
200
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
2.6E-08
mg/m3
5.0E-05
mg/m3
0.00052
2.6E-08
mg/m3
5.0E-05
mg/m3
0.00052
Molybdenum
0.51
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
6.6E-11
mg/m3
2.0E-03
mg/m3
0.000000033
6.6E-11
mg/m3
2.0E-03
mg/m3
0.000000033
Selenium
5.4
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
7.0E-10
mg/m3
2.0E-02
mg/m3
0.000000035
7.0E-10
mg/m3
2.0E-02
mg/m3
0.000000035
Thallium
0.16
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
-
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Uranium
42
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
5.5E-09
mg/m3
4.0E-05
mg/m3
0.000137
5.5E-09
mg/m3
4.0E-05
mg/m3
0.00014
Vanadium
18
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
2.3E-09
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.000023
2.3E-09
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.000023
Metals Cancer Total
2E-07
Metals Noncancer Total
0.0011
Metals Noncancer Total
0.001
Exposure Route Cancer Total
4E-07
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.0011
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.001
Exposure Medium: Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Plant Consumption
Uranium-238
1.3
pCi/g
9.2E+04
pCi/g
8.7E-11
risk/pCi/g
8.0E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
1.4
pCi/g
9.9E+04
pCi/g
9.6E-11
risk/pCi/g
9.5E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
3.6
pCi/g
6.5E+04
pCi/g
1.2E-10
risk/pCi/g
7.7E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
43
pCi/g
4.7E+06
pCi/g
3.7E-09
risk/pCi/g
1.7E-02
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
2E-02
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
6,300
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
7.6E-02
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.076
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.20
Arsenic
6.3
mg/kg
8.8E-05
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
1.3E-04
8.2E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.27
2.1E-04
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.71
Barium
160
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.7E-03
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.018
9.8E-03
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.049
Cadmium
0.13
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
7.7E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.077
2.1E-05
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.21
Chromium
10
mg/kg
2.8E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
1.4E-04
1.2E-04
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.040
3.2E-04
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.11
Cobalt
6.9
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.2E-04
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.41
3.3E-04
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
1.1
Copper
13
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.2E-03
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.055
5.9E-03
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.15
Iron
16,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
--
1.9E-01
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.27
5.0E-01
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.71
Manganese
200
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.2E-02
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.92
5.8E-02
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
2.4
Molybdenum
0.51
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
5.6E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0112
1.5E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.030
Selenium
5.4
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
9.7E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.019
2.6E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.052
Thallium
0.16
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.6E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.16
4.5E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.45
Uranium
42
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
5.5E-04
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
2.73
1.5E-03
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
7.6
Vanadium
18
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.2E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.043
5.9E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.12
Metals Cancer Total
3E-04
Metals Noncancer Total
5
Metals Noncancer Total
14
Exposure Route Cancer Total
2E-02
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
5
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
14
Page 8 of 11
-------
Table C-5.2. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Quivira Church Rock Mine No. 1 East
Church Rock Mine No. 1 East - Kee'da'whii teeh (Full-Time Resident)
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer
lntakec
Units
Slope
Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk6
Adult
Noncancer
Intake3
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Child
Noncancer
lntakec
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Child
Exposure Medium: Subsurface Soil
0-72 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Animal Consumption
Uranium-238
1.3
pCi/g
1.1E+05
pCi/g
8.7E-11
risk/pCi/g
9.1E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
1.4
pCi/g
1.1E+05
pCi/g
9.6E-11
risk/pCi/g
1.1E-05
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
3.6
pCi/g
1.4E+02
pCi/g
1.2E-10
risk/pCi/g
1.7E-08
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
43
pCi/g
9.0E+06
pCi/g
3.7E-09
risk/pCi/g
3.3E-02
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
3E-02
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
6,300
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
4.4E-03
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.0044
1.2E-02
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.012
Arsenic
6.3
mg/kg
6.9E-06
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
1.0E-05
6.2E-06
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.021
1.6E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.055
Barium
160
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.1E-05
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.00010
5.6E-05
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.00028
Cadmium
0.13
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.0E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0030
7.8E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0078
Chromium
10
mg/kg
6.1E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
3.1E-05
2.6E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0088
7.0E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.023
Cobalt
6.9
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
6.6E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.22
1.8E-04
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.60
Copper
13
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.2E-04
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0029
3.1E-04
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0078
Iron
16,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.5E-01
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.21
3.8E-01
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.55
Manganese
200
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
6.6E-05
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0028
1.8E-04
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0074
Molybdenum
0.51
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.3E-06
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.00046
6.1E-06
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0012
Selenium
5.4
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
4.2E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.083
1.1E-03
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.23
Thallium
0.16
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.9E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.29
7.8E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.78
Uranium
42
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
5.9E-06
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0294
1.6E-05
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.080
Vanadium
18
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.0E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0040
5.4E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.011
Metals Cancer Total
4E-05
Metals Noncancer Total
0.9
Metals Noncancer Total
2
Exposure Route Cancer Total
3E-02
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.9
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
2
Exposure Medium: Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Other Dine Lifeways Plant Ingestion
Uranium-238
1.3
pCi/g
4.3E+04
pCi/g
8.7E-11
risk/pCi/g
3.7E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
1.4
pCi/g
4.6E+04
pCi/g
9.6E-11
risk/pCi/g
4.4E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
3.6
pCi/g
3.5E+04
pCi/g
1.2E-10
risk/pCi/g
4.2E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
43
pCi/g
2.6E+06
pCi/g
3.7E-09
risk/pCi/g
9.5E-03
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
1E-02
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
6,300
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
4.5E-02
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.045
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
—
Arsenic
6.3
mg/kg
4.5E-05
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
6.7E-05
4.9E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.16
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Barium
160
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.4E-03
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.0120
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Cadmium
0.13
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
5.2E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.052
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Chromium
10
mg/kg
8.7E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
4.4E-05
7.3E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.024
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Cobalt
6.9
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
7.6E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.25
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Copper
13
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.4E-03
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.036
—
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Iron
16,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
--
1.1E-01
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.16
—
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Manganese
200
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.5E-02
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.61
—
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Molybdenum
0.51
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.7E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0074
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Selenium
5.4
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
5.9E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.012
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Thallium
0.16
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.0E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.10
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
—
Uranium
42
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.5E-04
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
1.7
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Vanadium
18
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.4E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.027
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Metals Cancer Total
1E-04
Metals Noncancer Total
3
Metals Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route Cancer Total
1E-02
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
3
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
-
Page 9 of 11
-------
Table C-5.2. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Quivira Church Rock Mine No. 1 East
Church Rock Mine No. 1 East - Kee'da'whii teeh (Full-Time Resident)
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer
lntakec
Units
Slope
Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk6
Adult
Noncancer
Intake3
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Child
Noncancer
lntakec
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Child
Exposure Medium: Subsurface Soil
0-72 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Other Dine Lifeways Plant Dermal
Aluminum
6,300
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
—
Arsenic
6.3
mg/kg
3.8E-06
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
5.7E-06
4.1E-06
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.014
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Barium
160
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Cadmium
0.13
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
5.7E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0057
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Chromium
10
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Cobalt
6.9
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Copper
13
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Iron
16,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Manganese
200
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Molybdenum
0.51
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Selenium
5.4
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Thallium
0.16
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
—
Uranium
42
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Vanadium
18
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Metals Cancer Total
6E-06
Metals Noncancer Total
0.02
Metals Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route Cancer Total
6E-06
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.02
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Medium: Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Other Dine Lifeways Plant Inhalation
Uranium-238
1.3
pCi/g
3.0E+02
pCi
2.4E-08
risk/pCi
7.1E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
1.4
pCi/g
3.2E+02
pCi
2.8E-08
risk/pCi
9.0E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
3.6
pCi/g
1.6E+02
pCi
3.4E-08
risk/pCi
5.5E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
43
pCi/g
2.7E+04
pCi
5.9E-08
risk/pCi
1.6E-03
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
2E-03
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
6,300
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
4.5E-04
mg/m3
5.0E-03
mg/m3
0.091
—
mg/m3
5.0E-03
mg/m3
—
Arsenic
6.3
mg/kg
4.5E-04
ug/m3
4.3E-03
(ug/m3)"1
2.0E-06
5.0E-07
mg/m3
1.5E-05
mg/m3
0.033
—
mg/m3
1.5E-05
mg/m3
—
Barium
160
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
2.4E-05
mg/m3
5.0E-04
mg/m3
0.048
—
mg/m3
5.0E-04
mg/m3
—
Cadmium
0.13
mg/kg
4.8E-05
ug/m3
1.8E-03
(ug/m3)"1
8.7E-08
5.2E-08
mg/m3
1.0E-05
mg/m3
0.0052
—
mg/m3
1.0E-05
mg/m3
—
Chromium
10
mg/kg
8.9E-04
ug/m3
8.4E-02
(ug/m3)"1
7.5E-05
7.5E-07
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.0075
—
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
—
Cobalt
6.9
mg/kg
7.6E-04
ug/m3
9.0E-03
(ug/m3)"1
6.8E-06
8.3E-07
mg/m3
6.0E-06
mg/m3
0.14
—
mg/m3
6.0E-06
mg/m3
—
Copper
13
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Iron
16,000
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
-
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Manganese
200
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
1.5E-04
mg/m3
5.0E-05
mg/m3
2.9
—
mg/m3
5.0E-05
mg/m3
—
Molybdenum
0.51
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
3.7E-07
mg/m3
2.0E-03
mg/m3
0.00019
—
mg/m3
2.0E-03
mg/m3
—
Selenium
5.4
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
5.9E-07
mg/m3
2.0E-02
mg/m3
0.000030
—
mg/m3
2.0E-02
mg/m3
—
Thallium
0.16
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
-
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Uranium
42
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
3.6E-06
mg/m3
4.0E-05
mg/m3
0.089
—
mg/m3
4.0E-05
mg/m3
—
Vanadium
18
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
1.4E-06
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.014
—
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
—
Metals Cancer Total
8E-05
Metals Noncancer Total
o
O
Metals Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route Cancer Total
2E-03
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
3
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
—
Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs) Receptor Cancer Risk Total
8E-02
Receptor/Media Noncancer Hazard Total
10
Receptor/Media Noncancer Hazard Total
20
Page 10 of 11
-------
Table C-5.2. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Quivira Church Rock Mine No. 1 East
Notes:
a COPCs are the constituents of interest with a maximum detected concentration exceeding the COPC screening level (see Table C-1).
b EPCs are provided on Table C-4.
c The intakes are the EPC multiplied by the exposure parameters and any applicable contaminant-specific inputs (see Table C-3 for exposure inputs, Table 4 of the NAUM risk assessment methodology [USEPA 2024b] report for contaminant-specific inputs,
and Appendix B of the NAUM risk assessment methodology [USEPA 2024b] report for equations).
d The toxicity values are provided in Table 4 of the NAUM risk assessment methodology (USEPA 2024b).
e The cancer risk for each contaminant for each exposure pathway is calculated by multiplying the cancer intake value with the toxicity value as follows: For contaminant i: Risk, = Cancer Intake, x Toxicity Factor,
f The noncancer hazard for each contaminant for each exposure pathway is calculated by dividing the noncancer intake value by the toxicity value as follows: For contaminant i: Hazard, = Noncancer Intake, / Toxicity Factor,
COPC
EPC
mg/kg
|jg/m3
bgs
mg/kg-day
mg/m3
Not applicable
Microgram per cubic meter
Below ground surface
Contaminant of potential concern
Exposure point concentration
Milligram per kilogram
Milligram per kilogram per day
Milligram per cubic meter
pCi
pCi/g
RfC
RfD
SE
NAUM
USEPA
Navajo abandoned uranium mine
Picocurie
Picocurie per gram
Reference concentration
Reference dose
Secular equilibrium
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Reference:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2024b. "Navajo Abandoned Uranium Mines Risk Assessment Methodology." Draft Final. March.
Page 11 of 11
-------
Table C-5.3. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Kerr-McGee Ponds on the Navajo Nation
Kerr-McGee Ponds on the Navajo Nation - Kee'da'whii teeh (Full-Time Resident)
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer
lntakec
Units
Slope
Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk8
Adult
Noncancer
Intake
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Child
Noncancer
lntakec
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Child
Exposure Medium: Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs
Exposure Route: Incidental Soil Ingestion
Uranium-238
1.1
pCi/g
1.0E+04
pCi/g
1.3E-10
risk/pCi/g
1.4E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
0.97
pCi/g
9.2E+03
pCi/g
1.5E-10
risk/pCi/g
1.4E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
2.0
pCi/g
1.9E+04
pCi/g
1.7E-10
risk/pCi/g
3.2E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
9.3
pCi/g
8.8E+04
pCi/g
5.7E-09
risk/pCi/g
5.0E-04
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
5E-04
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
6,900
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.0E-02
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.030
1.8E-01
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.18
Arsenic
5.9
mg/kg
2.1E-05
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
3.2E-05
1.5E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.051
8.9E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.30
Barium
82
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.5E-04
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.0018
2.1E-03
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.011
Cadmium
0.16
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
6.9E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0069
4.2E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.042
Chromium
8.2
mg/kg
1.31E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
6.6E-05
3.5E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.012
2.1E-04
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.071
Cobalt
5.2
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.2E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.075
1.4E-04
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.45
Copper
11
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
4.7E-05
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0012
2.9E-04
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0072
Iron
15,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
6.5E-02
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.092
3.9E-01
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.56
Manganese
230
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
9.9E-04
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.041
6.0E-03
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.25
Molybdenum
0.6
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.4E-06
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.00047
1.4E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0029
Selenium
2.9
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.2E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0025
7.5E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.015
Thallium
0.15
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
6.5E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.065
3.9E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.39
Uranium
6.2
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.7E-05
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.13
1.6E-04
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.81
Vanadium
17
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
7.3E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.015
4.4E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.088
Metals Cancer Total
1E-04
Metals Noncancer Total
0.5
Metals Noncancer Total
3
Exposure Route Cancer Total
6E-04
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.5
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
3
Page 1 of 11
-------
Table C-5.3. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Kerr-McGee Ponds on the Navajo Nation
Kerr-McGee Ponds on the Navajo Nation - Kee'da'whii teeh (Full-Time Resident)
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer
lntakec
Units
Slope
Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk8
Adult
Noncancer
Intake
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Child
Noncancer
lntakec
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Child
Exposure Medium: Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs
Exposure Route: External Exposure
Uranium-238
1.1
pCi/g
5.6E+01
pCi/g
1.2E-10
risk/year pCi/g
7.0E-09
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
0.97
pCi/g
4.9E+01
pCi/g
2.5E-10
risk/year pCi/g
1.3E-08
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
2.0
pCi/g
1.0E+02
pCi/g
8.5E-10
risk/year pCi/g
8.6E-08
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
9.3
pCi/g
4.7E+02
pCi/g
8.4E-06
risk/year pCi/g
4.0E-03
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
4E-03
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route Cancer Total
4E-03
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route: Dermal Exposure
Aluminum
6,900
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
—
Arsenic
5.9
mg/kg
1.2E-06
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
1.9E-06
8.9E-07
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0030
5.4E-06
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.018
Barium
82
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Cadmium
0.16
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.2E-08
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.00032
1.9E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0019
Chromium
8.2
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Cobalt
5.2
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Copper
11
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Iron
15,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Manganese
230
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Molybdenum
0.6
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Selenium
2.9
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Thallium
0.15
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
—
Uranium
6.2
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Vanadium
17
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Metals Cancer Total
2E-06
Metals Noncancer Total
0.003
Metals Noncancer Total
0.02
Exposure Route Cancer Total
2E-06
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.003
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.02
Page 2 of 11
-------
Table C-5.3. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Kerr-McGee Ponds on the Navajo Nation
Kerr-McGee Ponds on the Navajo Nation - Kee'da'whii teeh (Full-Time Resident)
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer
lntakec
Units
Slope
Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk8
Adult
Noncancer
Intake
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Child
Noncancer
lntakec
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Child
Exposure Medium: Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs
Exposure Route: Inhalation of Particulates
Uranium-238
1.1
pCi/g
9.6E-02
pCi
2.4E-08
risk/pCi
2.3E-09
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
0.97
pCi/g
8.4E-02
pCi
2.8E-08
risk/pCi
2.3E-09
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
2.0
pCi/g
1.7E-01
pCi
3.4E-08
risk/pCi
5.9E-09
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
9.3
pCi/g
8.1E-01
pCi
5.9E-08
risk/pCi
4.8E-08
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
6E-08
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
6,900
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3y1
—
9.0E-07
mg/m3
5.0E-03
mg/m3
0.00018
9.0E-07
mg/m3
5.0E-03
mg/m3
0.00018
Arsenic
5.9
mg/kg
7.7E-07
ug/m3
4.3E-03
(ug/m3y1
3.3E-09
7.7E-10
mg/m3
1.5E-05
mg/m3
0.000051
7.7E-10
mg/m3
1.5E-05
mg/m3
0.000051
Barium
82
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
1.1E-08
mg/m3
5.0E-04
mg/m3
0.000021
1.1E-08
mg/m3
5.0E-04
mg/m3
0.000021
Cadmium
0.16
mg/kg
2.1E-08
ug/m3
1.8E-03
(ug/m3)"1
3.7E-11
2.1E-11
mg/m3
1.0E-05
mg/m3
0.0000021
2.1E-11
mg/m3
1.0E-05
mg/m3
0.0000021
Chromium
8.2
mg/kg
1.8E-06
ug/m3
8.4E-02
(ug/m3)"1
1.5E-07
1.1E-09
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.000011
1.1E-09
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.000011
Cobalt
5.2
mg/kg
6.8E-07
ug/m3
9.0E-03
(ug/m3)"1
6.1E-09
6.8E-10
mg/m3
6.0E-06
mg/m3
0.00011
6.8E-10
mg/m3
6.0E-06
mg/m3
0.00011
Copper
11
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Iron
15,000
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
-
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Manganese
230
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
3.0E-08
mg/m3
5.0E-05
mg/m3
0.00060
3.0E-08
mg/m3
5.0E-05
mg/m3
0.00060
Molybdenum
0.6
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
7.2E-11
mg/m3
2.0E-03
mg/m3
0.000000036
7.2E-11
mg/m3
2.0E-03
mg/m3
0.000000036
Selenium
2.9
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
3.8E-10
mg/m3
2.0E-02
mg/m3
0.000000019
3.8E-10
mg/m3
2.0E-02
mg/m3
0.000000019
Thallium
0.15
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
-
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Uranium
6.2
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
8.1E-10
mg/m3
4.0E-05
mg/m3
0.000020
8.1E-10
mg/m3
4.0E-05
mg/m3
0.000020
Vanadium
17
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
2.2E-09
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.000022
2.2E-09
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.000022
Metals Cancer Total
2E-07
Metals Noncancer Total
0.0010
Metals Noncancer Total
0.0010
Exposure Route Cancer Total
2E-07
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.0010
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.0010
Exposure Medium: Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Plant Consumption
Uranium-238
1.1
pCi/g
7.8E+04
pCi/g
8.7E-11
risk/pCi/g
6.8E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
0.97
pCi/g
6.9E+04
pCi/g
9.6E-11
risk/pCi/g
6.6E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
2.0
pCi/g
3.6E+04
pCi/g
1.2E-10
risk/pCi/g
4.3E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
9.3
pCi/g
1.0E+06
pCi/g
3.7E-09
risk/pCi/g
3.8E-03
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
4E-03
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
6,900
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
8.3E-02
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.083
2.1E-01
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.21
Arsenic
5.9
mg/kg
8.3E-05
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
1.2E-04
7.7E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.26
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.67
Barium
82
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.9E-03
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.009
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.025
Cadmium
0.16
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
9.4E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.094
2.6E-05
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.26
Chromium
8.2
mg/kg
2.29E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
1.1E-04
9.9E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.033
2.6E-04
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.088
Cobalt
5.2
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
9.4E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.31
2.5E-04
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.83
Copper
11
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.9E-03
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.047
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.12
Iron
15,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
--
1.8E-01
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.26
4.7E-01
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.66
Manganese
230
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.5E-02
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
1.1
6.7E-02
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
2.8
Molybdenum
0.6
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
6.1E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0121
1.6E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.032
Selenium
2.9
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
5.2E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.010
1.4E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.028
Thallium
0.15
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.5E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.15
4.2E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.42
Uranium
6.2
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
8.1E-05
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.40
2.2E-04
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
1.1
Vanadium
17
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.041
5.6E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.112
Metals Cancer Total
2E-04
Metals Noncancer Total
3
Metals Noncancer Total
7
Exposure Route Cancer Total
4E-03
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
3
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
7
Page 3 of 11
-------
Table C-5.3. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Kerr-McGee Ponds on the Navajo Nation
Kerr-McGee Ponds on the Navajo Nation - Kee'da'whii teeh (Full-Time Resident)
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer
lntakec
Units
Slope
Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk8
Adult
Noncancer
Intake
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Child
Noncancer
lntakec
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Child
Exposure Medium: Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs
Exposure Route: Animal Consumption
Uranium-238
1.1
pCi/g
8.9E+04
pCi/g
8.7E-11
risk/pCi/g
7.7E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
0.97
pCi/g
7.9E+04
pCi/g
9.6E-11
risk/pCi/g
7.5E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
2.0
pCi/g
7.8E+01
pCi/g
1.2E-10
risk/pCi/g
9.3E-09
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
9.3
pCi/g
2.0E+06
pCi/g
3.7E-09
risk/pCi/g
7.2E-03
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
7E-03
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
6,900
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
4.8E-03
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.0048
1.3E-02
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.0131
Arsenic
5.9
mg/kg
6.5E-06
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
9.7E-06
5.8E-06
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.019
1.5E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.051
Barium
82
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.1E-05
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.000053
2.9E-05
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.00014
Cadmium
0.16
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.7E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0037
9.6E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0096
Chromium
8.2
mg/kg
5.03E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
2.5E-05
2.2E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0072
5.8E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.019
Cobalt
5.2
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
5.0E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.17
1.4E-04
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.45
Copper
11
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
9.9E-05
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0025
2.6E-04
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0066
Iron
15,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.4E-01
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.20
3.6E-01
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.51
Manganese
230
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
7.6E-05
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0032
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0085
Molybdenum
0.6
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.5E-06
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.00050
6.6E-06
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0013
Selenium
2.9
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.2E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.045
6.1E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.12
Thallium
0.15
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.7E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.27
7.4E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.74
Uranium
6.2
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
8.7E-07
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0043
2.4E-06
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.012
Vanadium
17
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.9E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0037
5.1E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.010
Metals Cancer Total
3E-05
Metals Noncancer Total
0.7
Metals Noncancer Total
2
Exposure Route Cancer Total
7E-03
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.7
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
2
Exposure Medium: Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Other Dine Lifeways Plant Ingestion
Uranium-238
1.1
pCi/g
3.6E+04
pCi/g
8.7E-11
risk/pCi/g
3.1E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
0.97
pCi/g
3.2E+04
pCi/g
9.6E-11
risk/pCi/g
3.1E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
2.0
pCi/g
2.0E+04
pCi/g
1.2E-10
risk/pCi/g
2.3E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
9.3
pCi/g
5.6E+05
pCi/g
3.7E-09
risk/pCi/g
2.1E-03
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
2E-03
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
6,900
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
4.9E-02
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.049
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
—
Arsenic
5.9
mg/kg
4.2E-05
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
6.3E-05
4.5E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.15
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Barium
82
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.2E-03
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.0062
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Cadmium
0.16
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
6.4E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.064
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Chromium
8.2
mg/kg
7.2E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
3.6E-05
6.0E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.020
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Cobalt
5.2
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
5.7E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.19
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Copper
11
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.2E-03
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.030
—
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Iron
15,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
--
1.1E-01
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.15
—
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Manganese
230
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.7E-02
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.70
—
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Molybdenum
0.6
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
4.0E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0080
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Selenium
2.9
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.2E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0064
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Thallium
0.15
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
9.5E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.095
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
—
Uranium
6.2
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
5.1E-05
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.26
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Vanadium
17
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.3E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.026
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Metals Cancer Total
1E-04
Metals Noncancer Total
2
Metals Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route Cancer Total
2E-03
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
2
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
-
Page 4 of 11
-------
Table C-5.3. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Kerr-McGee Ponds on the Navajo Nation
Kerr-McGee Ponds on the Navajo Nation - Kee'da'whii teeh (Full-Time Resident)
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer
lntakec
Units
Slope
Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk8
Adult
Noncancer
Intake
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Child
Noncancer
lntakec
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Child
Exposure Medium: Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs
Exposure Route: Other Dine Lifeways Plant Dermal
Aluminum
6,900
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
—
Arsenic
5.9
mg/kg
3.5E-06
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
5.3E-06
3.8E-06
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.013
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Barium
82
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Cadmium
0.16
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
7.0E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0070
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Chromium
8.2
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Cobalt
5.2
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Copper
11
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Iron
15,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Manganese
230
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Molybdenum
0.6
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Selenium
2.9
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Thallium
0.15
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
—
Uranium
6.2
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Vanadium
17
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Metals Cancer Total
5E-06
Metals Noncancer Total
0.02
Metals Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route Cancer Total
5E-06
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.02
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Medium: Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Other Dine Lifeways Plant Inhalation
Uranium-238
1.1
pCi/g
2.5E+02
pCi
2.4E-08
risk/pCi
6.0E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
0.97
pCi/g
2.2E+02
pCi
2.8E-08
risk/pCi
6.2E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
2.0
pCi/g
9.0E+01
pCi
3.4E-08
risk/pCi
3.1E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
9.3
pCi/g
5.9E+03
pCi
5.9E-08
risk/pCi
3.5E-04
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
4E-04
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
6,900
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
5.0E-04
mg/m3
5.0E-03
mg/m3
0.099
—
mg/m3
5.0E-03
mg/m3
—
Arsenic
5.9
mg/kg
4.2E-04
ug/m3
4.3E-03
(ug/m3)"1
1.8E-06
4.7E-07
mg/m3
1.5E-05
mg/m3
0.031
—
mg/m3
1.5E-05
mg/m3
—
Barium
82
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
1.2E-05
mg/m3
5.0E-04
mg/m3
0.025
—
mg/m3
5.0E-04
mg/m3
—
Cadmium
0.16
mg/kg
5.9E-05
ug/m3
1.8E-03
(ug/m3)"1
1.1E-07
6.4E-08
mg/m3
1.0E-05
mg/m3
0.0064
—
mg/m3
1.0E-05
mg/m3
—
Chromium
8.2
mg/kg
7.3E-04
ug/m3
8.4E-02
(ug/m3)"1
6.1E-05
6.1E-07
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.0061
—
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
—
Cobalt
5.2
mg/kg
5.7E-04
ug/m3
9.0E-03
(ug/m3)"1
5.1E-06
6.2E-07
mg/m3
6.0E-06
mg/m3
0.10
—
mg/m3
6.0E-06
mg/m3
—
Copper
11
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Iron
15,000
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
-
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Manganese
230
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
1.7E-04
mg/m3
5.0E-05
mg/m3
3.4
—
mg/m3
5.0E-05
mg/m3
—
Molybdenum
0.6
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
4.0E-07
mg/m3
2.0E-03
mg/m3
0.00020
—
mg/m3
2.0E-03
mg/m3
—
Selenium
2.9
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
3.2E-07
mg/m3
2.0E-02
mg/m3
0.000016
—
mg/m3
2.0E-02
mg/m3
—
Thallium
0.15
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
-
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Uranium
6.2
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
5.3E-07
mg/m3
4.0E-05
mg/m3
0.013
—
mg/m3
4.0E-05
mg/m3
—
Vanadium
17
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
1.3E-06
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.013
—
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
—
Metals Cancer Total
7E-05
Metals Noncancer Total
4
Metals Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route Cancer Total
4E-04
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
4
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
—
Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs) Receptor Cancer Risk Total
2E-02
Receptor/Media Noncancer Hazard Total
9
Receptor/Media Noncancer Hazard Total
10
Page 5 of 11
-------
Table C-5.3. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Kerr-McGee Ponds on the Navajo Nation
Kerr-McGee Ponds on the Navajo Nation - Kee'da'whii teeh (Full-Time Resident)
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer
lntakec
Units
Slope
Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk8
Adult
Noncancer
Intake
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Child
Noncancer
lntakec
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Child
Exposure Medium: Subsurface Soil
0-72 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Incidental Soil Ingestion
Uranium-238
1.1
pCi/g
1.0E+04
pCi/g
1.3E-10
risk/pCi/g
1.4E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
0.97
pCi/g
9.2E+03
pCi/g
1.5E-10
risk/pCi/g
1.4E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
2.0
pCi/g
1.9E+04
pCi/g
1.7E-10
risk/pCi/g
3.2E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
9.3
pCi/g
8.8E+04
pCi/g
5.7E-09
risk/pCi/g
5.0E-04
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
5E-04
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
6,900
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.0E-02
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.030
1.8E-01
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.18
Arsenic
5.9
mg/kg
2.1E-05
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
3.2E-05
1.5E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.051
8.9E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.30
Barium
82
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.5E-04
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.0018
2.1E-03
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.011
Cadmium
0.16
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
6.9E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0069
4.2E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.042
Chromium
8.2
mg/kg
1.31E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
6.6E-05
3.5E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.012
2.1E-04
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.071
Cobalt
5.2
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.2E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.075
1.4E-04
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.45
Copper
11
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
4.7E-05
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0012
2.9E-04
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0072
Iron
15,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
6.5E-02
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.092
3.9E-01
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.56
Manganese
230
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
9.9E-04
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.041
6.0E-03
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.25
Molybdenum
0.6
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.4E-06
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.00047
1.4E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0029
Selenium
2.9
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.2E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0025
7.5E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.015
Thallium
0.15
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
6.5E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.065
3.9E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.39
Uranium
6.2
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.7E-05
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.13
1.6E-04
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.81
Vanadium
17
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
7.3E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.015
4.4E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.088
Metals Cancer Total
1E-04
Metals Noncancer Total
0.5
Metals Noncancer Total
3
Exposure Route Cancer Total
6E-04
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.5
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
3
Page 6 of 11
-------
Table C-5.3. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Kerr-McGee Ponds on the Navajo Nation
Kerr-McGee Ponds on the Navajo Nation - Kee'da'whii teeh (Full-Time Resident)
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer
lntakec
Units
Slope
Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk8
Adult
Noncancer
Intake
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Child
Noncancer
lntakec
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Child
Exposure Medium: Subsurface Soil
0-72 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: External Exposure
Uranium-238
1.1
pCi/g
5.6E+01
pCi/g
1.2E-10
risk/year pCi/g
7.0E-09
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
0.97
pCi/g
4.9E+01
pCi/g
2.5E-10
risk/year pCi/g
1.3E-08
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
2.0
pCi/g
1.0E+02
pCi/g
8.5E-10
risk/year pCi/g
8.6E-08
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
9.3
pCi/g
4.7E+02
pCi/g
8.4E-06
risk/year pCi/g
4.0E-03
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
4E-03
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route Cancer Total
4E-03
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route: Dermal Exposure
Aluminum
6,900
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
—
Arsenic
5.9
mg/kg
1.2E-06
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
1.9E-06
8.9E-07
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0030
5.4E-06
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.018
Barium
82
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Cadmium
0.16
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.2E-08
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.00032
1.9E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0019
Chromium
8.2
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Cobalt
5.2
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Copper
11
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Iron
15,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Manganese
230
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Molybdenum
0.6
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Selenium
2.9
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Thallium
0.15
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
—
Uranium
6.2
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Vanadium
17
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Metals Cancer Total
2E-06
Metals Noncancer Total
0.003
Metals Noncancer Total
0.02
Exposure Route Cancer Total
2E-06
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.003
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.02
Page 7 of 11
-------
Table C-5.3. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Kerr-McGee Ponds on the Navajo Nation
Kerr-McGee Ponds on the Navajo Nation - Kee'da'whii teeh (Full-Time Resident)
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer
lntakec
Units
Slope
Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk8
Adult
Noncancer
Intake
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Child
Noncancer
lntakec
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Child
Exposure Medium: Subsurface Soil
0-72 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Inhalation of Particulates
Uranium-238
1.1
pCi/g
9.6E-02
pCi
2.4E-08
risk/pCi
2.3E-09
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
0.97
pCi/g
8.4E-02
pCi
2.8E-08
risk/pCi
2.3E-09
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
2.0
pCi/g
1.7E-01
pCi
3.4E-08
risk/pCi
5.9E-09
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
9.3
pCi/g
8.1E-01
pCi
5.9E-08
risk/pCi
4.8E-08
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
6E-08
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
6,900
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3y1
—
9.0E-07
mg/m3
5.0E-03
mg/m3
0.00018
9.0E-07
mg/m3
5.0E-03
mg/m3
0.00018
Arsenic
5.9
mg/kg
7.7E-07
ug/m3
4.3E-03
(ug/m3y1
3.3E-09
7.7E-10
mg/m3
1.5E-05
mg/m3
0.000051
7.7E-10
mg/m3
1.5E-05
mg/m3
0.000051
Barium
82
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
1.1E-08
mg/m3
5.0E-04
mg/m3
0.000021
1.1E-08
mg/m3
5.0E-04
mg/m3
0.000021
Cadmium
0.16
mg/kg
2.1E-08
ug/m3
1.8E-03
(ug/m3)"1
3.7E-11
2.1E-11
mg/m3
1.0E-05
mg/m3
0.0000021
2.1E-11
mg/m3
1.0E-05
mg/m3
0.0000021
Chromium
8.2
mg/kg
1.8E-06
ug/m3
8.4E-02
(ug/m3)"1
1.5E-07
1.1E-09
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.0000107
1.1E-09
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.0000107
Cobalt
5.2
mg/kg
6.8E-07
ug/m3
9.0E-03
(ug/m3)"1
6.1E-09
6.8E-10
mg/m3
6.0E-06
mg/m3
0.00011
6.8E-10
mg/m3
6.0E-06
mg/m3
0.00011
Copper
11
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Iron
15,000
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
-
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Manganese
230
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
3.0E-08
mg/m3
5.0E-05
mg/m3
0.00060
3.0E-08
mg/m3
5.0E-05
mg/m3
0.00060
Molybdenum
0.6
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
7.2E-11
mg/m3
2.0E-03
mg/m3
0.000000036
7.2E-11
mg/m3
2.0E-03
mg/m3
0.000000036
Selenium
2.9
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
3.8E-10
mg/m3
2.0E-02
mg/m3
0.000000019
3.8E-10
mg/m3
2.0E-02
mg/m3
0.000000019
Thallium
0.15
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
-
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Uranium
6.2
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
8.1E-10
mg/m3
4.0E-05
mg/m3
0.000020
8.1E-10
mg/m3
4.0E-05
mg/m3
0.000020
Vanadium
17
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
2.2E-09
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.000022
2.2E-09
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.000022
Metals Cancer Total
2E-07
Metals Noncancer Total
0.001
Metals Noncancer Total
0.001
Exposure Route Cancer Total
2E-07
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.001
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.001
Exposure Medium: Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Plant Consumption
Uranium-238
1.1
pCi/g
7.8E+04
pCi/g
8.7E-11
risk/pCi/g
6.8E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
0.97
pCi/g
6.9E+04
pCi/g
9.6E-11
risk/pCi/g
6.6E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
2.0
pCi/g
3.6E+04
pCi/g
1.2E-10
risk/pCi/g
4.3E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
9.3
pCi/g
1.0E+06
pCi/g
3.7E-09
risk/pCi/g
3.8E-03
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
4E-03
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
6,900
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
8.3E-02
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.083
2.1E-01
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.21
Arsenic
5.9
mg/kg
8.3E-05
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
1.2E-04
7.7E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.26
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.67
Barium
82
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.9E-03
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.009
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.025
Cadmium
0.16
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
9.4E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.094
2.6E-05
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.26
Chromium
8.2
mg/kg
2.3E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
1.1E-04
9.9E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.033
2.6E-04
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.088
Cobalt
5.2
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
9.4E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.31
2.5E-04
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.83
Copper
11
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.9E-03
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.047
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.12
Iron
15,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
--
1.8E-01
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.26
4.7E-01
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.66
Manganese
230
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.5E-02
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
1.1
6.7E-02
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
2.8
Molybdenum
0.6
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
6.1E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.012
1.6E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.032
Selenium
2.9
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
5.2E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.010
1.4E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.028
Thallium
0.15
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.5E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.15
4.2E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.42
Uranium
6.2
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
8.1E-05
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.40
2.2E-04
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
1.1
Vanadium
17
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.041
5.6E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.11
Metals Cancer Total
2E-04
Metals Noncancer Total
3
Metals Noncancer Total
7
Exposure Route Cancer Total
4E-03
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
3
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
7
Page 8 of 11
-------
Table C-5.3. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Kerr-McGee Ponds on the Navajo Nation
Kerr-McGee Ponds on the Navajo Nation - Kee'da'whii teeh (Full-Time Resident)
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer
lntakec
Units
Slope
Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk8
Adult
Noncancer
Intake
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Child
Noncancer
lntakec
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Child
Exposure Medium: Subsurface Soil
0-72 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Animal Consumption
Uranium-238
1.1
pCi/g
8.9E+04
pCi/g
8.7E-11
risk/pCi/g
7.7E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
0.97
pCi/g
7.9E+04
pCi/g
9.6E-11
risk/pCi/g
7.5E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
2.0
pCi/g
7.8E+01
pCi/g
1.2E-10
risk/pCi/g
9.3E-09
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
9.3
pCi/g
2.0E+06
pCi/g
3.7E-09
risk/pCi/g
7.2E-03
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
7E-03
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
6,900
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
4.8E-03
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.0048
1.3E-02
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.013
Arsenic
5.9
mg/kg
6.5E-06
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
9.7E-06
5.8E-06
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.019
1.5E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.051
Barium
82
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.1E-05
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.000053
2.9E-05
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.00014
Cadmium
0.16
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.7E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0037
9.6E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0096
Chromium
8.2
mg/kg
5.0E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
2.5E-05
2.2E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0072
5.8E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.019
Cobalt
5.2
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
5.0E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.17
1.4E-04
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.45
Copper
11
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
9.9E-05
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0025
2.6E-04
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0066
Iron
15,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.4E-01
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.20
3.6E-01
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.51
Manganese
230
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
7.6E-05
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0032
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0085
Molybdenum
0.6
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.5E-06
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.00050
6.6E-06
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0013
Selenium
2.9
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.2E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.045
6.1E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.12
Thallium
0.15
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.7E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.27
7.4E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.74
Uranium
6.2
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
8.7E-07
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0043
2.4E-06
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.012
Vanadium
17
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.9E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0037
5.1E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.010
Metals Cancer Total
3E-05
Metals Noncancer Total
0.7
Metals Noncancer Total
2
Exposure Route Cancer Total
7E-03
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.7
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
2
Exposure Medium: Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Other Dine Lifeways Plant Ingestion
Uranium-238
1.1
pCi/g
3.6E+04
pCi/g
8.7E-11
risk/pCi/g
3.1E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
0.97
pCi/g
3.2E+04
pCi/g
9.6E-11
risk/pCi/g
3.1E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
2.0
pCi/g
2.0E+04
pCi/g
1.2E-10
risk/pCi/g
2.3E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
9.3
pCi/g
5.6E+05
pCi/g
3.7E-09
risk/pCi/g
2.1E-03
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
2E-03
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
6,900
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
4.9E-02
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.049
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
—
Arsenic
5.9
mg/kg
4.2E-05
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
6.3E-05
4.5E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.15
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Barium
82
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.2E-03
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.0062
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Cadmium
0.16
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
6.4E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.064
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Chromium
8.2
mg/kg
7.2E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
3.6E-05
6.0E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.020
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Cobalt
5.2
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
5.7E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.19
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Copper
11
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.2E-03
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.030
—
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Iron
15,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
--
1.1E-01
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.15
—
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Manganese
230
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.7E-02
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.70
—
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Molybdenum
0.6
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
4.0E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0080
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Selenium
2.9
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.2E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0064
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Thallium
0.15
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
9.5E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.095
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
—
Uranium
6.2
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
5.1E-05
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.26
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Vanadium
17
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.3E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.026
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Metals Cancer Total
1E-04
Metals Noncancer Total
2
Metals Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route Cancer Total
2E-03
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
2
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
-
Page 9 of 11
-------
Table C-5.3. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Kerr-McGee Ponds on the Navajo Nation
Kerr-McGee Ponds on the Navajo Nation - Kee'da'whii teeh (Full-Time Resident)
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer
lntakec
Units
Slope
Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk8
Adult
Noncancer
Intake
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Child
Noncancer
lntakec
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Child
Exposure Medium: Subsurface Soil
0-72 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Other Dine Lifeways Plant Dermal
Aluminum
6,900
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
—
Arsenic
5.9
mg/kg
3.5E-06
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
5.3E-06
3.8E-06
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.013
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Barium
82
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Cadmium
0.16
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
7.0E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0070
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Chromium
8.2
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Cobalt
5.2
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Copper
11
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Iron
15,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Manganese
230
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Molybdenum
0.6
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Selenium
2.9
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Thallium
0.15
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
—
Uranium
6.2
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Vanadium
17
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Metals Cancer Total
5E-06
Metals Noncancer Total
0.02
Metals Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route Cancer Total
5E-06
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.02
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Medium: Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Other Dine Lifeways Plant Inhalation
Uranium-238
1.1
pCi/g
2.5E+02
pCi
2.4E-08
risk/pCi
6.0E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
0.97
pCi/g
2.2E+02
pCi
2.8E-08
risk/pCi
6.2E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
2.0
pCi/g
9.0E+01
pCi
3.4E-08
risk/pCi
3.1E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
9.3
pCi/g
5.9E+03
pCi
5.9E-08
risk/pCi
3.5E-04
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
4E-04
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
6,900
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
5.0E-04
mg/m3
5.0E-03
mg/m3
0.099
—
mg/m3
5.0E-03
mg/m3
—
Arsenic
5.9
mg/kg
4.2E-04
ug/m3
4.3E-03
(ug/m3)"1
1.8E-06
4.7E-07
mg/m3
1.5E-05
mg/m3
0.031
—
mg/m3
1.5E-05
mg/m3
—
Barium
82
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
1.2E-05
mg/m3
5.0E-04
mg/m3
0.025
—
mg/m3
5.0E-04
mg/m3
—
Cadmium
0.16
mg/kg
5.9E-05
ug/m3
1.8E-03
(ug/m3)"1
1.1E-07
6.4E-08
mg/m3
1.0E-05
mg/m3
0.0064
—
mg/m3
1.0E-05
mg/m3
—
Chromium
8.2
mg/kg
7.3E-04
ug/m3
8.4E-02
(ug/m3)"1
6.1E-05
6.1E-07
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.0061
—
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
—
Cobalt
5.2
mg/kg
5.7E-04
ug/m3
9.0E-03
(ug/m3)"1
5.1E-06
6.2E-07
mg/m3
6.0E-06
mg/m3
0.10
—
mg/m3
6.0E-06
mg/m3
—
Copper
11
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Iron
15,000
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
-
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Manganese
230
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
1.7E-04
mg/m3
5.0E-05
mg/m3
3.4
—
mg/m3
5.0E-05
mg/m3
—
Molybdenum
0.6
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
4.0E-07
mg/m3
2.0E-03
mg/m3
0.00020
—
mg/m3
2.0E-03
mg/m3
—
Selenium
2.9
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
3.2E-07
mg/m3
2.0E-02
mg/m3
0.000016
—
mg/m3
2.0E-02
mg/m3
—
Thallium
0.15
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
-
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Uranium
6.2
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
5.3E-07
mg/m3
4.0E-05
mg/m3
0.013
—
mg/m3
4.0E-05
mg/m3
—
Vanadium
17
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
1.3E-06
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.013
—
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
—
Metals Cancer Total
7E-05
Metals Noncancer Total
4
Metals Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route Cancer Total
4E-04
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
4
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
—
Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs) Receptor Cancer Risk Total
2E-02
Receptor/Media Noncancer Hazard Total
9
Receptor/Media Noncancer Hazard Total
10
Page 10 of 11
-------
Table C-5.3. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Kerr-McGee Ponds on the Navajo Nation
Notes:
a COPCs are the constituents of interest with a maximum detected concentration exceeding the COPC screening level (see Table C-1).
b EPCs are provided on Table C-4.
c The intakes are the EPC multiplied by the exposure parameters and any applicable contaminant-specific inputs (see Table C-3 for exposure inputs, Table 4 of the NAUM risk assessment methodology [USEPA 2024b] report for contaminant-specific inputs,
and Appendix B of the NAUM risk assessment methodology [USEPA 2024b] report for equations).
d The toxicity values are provided in Table 4 of the NAUM risk assessment methodology (USEPA 2024b).
e The cancer risk for each contaminant for each exposure pathway is calculated by multiplying the cancer intake value with the toxicity value as follows: For contaminant i: Risk, = Cancer Intake, x Toxicity Factor,
f The noncancer hazard for each contaminant for each exposure pathway is calculated by dividing the noncancer intake value by the toxicity value as follows: For contaminant i: Hazard, = Noncancer Intake, / Toxicity Factor,
|jg/m3
bgs
COPC
EPC
Kerr-McGee
mg/kg
mg/kg-day
Not applicable
Microgram per cubic meter
Below ground surface
Contaminant of potential concern
Exposure point concentration
Kerr-McGee Corporation
Milligram per kilogram
Milligram per kilogram per day
mg/m3
NAUM
Milligram per cubic meter
Navajo abandoned uranium mine
Picocurie
Picocurie per gram
Reference concentration
Reference dose
Secular equilibrium
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
pCi
pCi/g
RfC
RfD
SE
USEPA
Reference:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2024b. "Navajo Abandoned Uranium Mines Risk Assessment Methodology." Draft Final. March.
Page 11 of 11
-------
Table C-5.4. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Kerr-McGee Ponds on United Nuclear Corporation Property
Kerr-McGee Ponds on United Nuclear Corporation Property - UNC Outdoor Worker
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer Intake0
Units
Slope Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk6
Adult
Noncancer
Intake
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Exposure Medium: Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Incidental Soil In
gestion
Uranium-238
2.4
pCi/g
6.0E+02
pCi/g
1.3E-10
risk/pCi/g
8.0E-08
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
2.4
pCi/g
6.0E+02
pCi/g
1.5E-10
risk/pCi/g
8.9E-08
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
3.4
pCi/g
8.5E+02
pCi/g
1.7E-10
risk/pCi/g
1.4E-07
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
13
pCi/g
3.3E+03
pCi/g
5.7E-09
risk/pCi/g
1.8E-05
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
2E-05
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
6,600
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.3E-03
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.0023
Arsenic
6.0
mg/kg
4.4E-07
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
6.6E-07
1.2E-06
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0041
Barium
83
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.8E-05
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.00014
Cadmium
0.11
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.8E-08
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.00038
Chromium
8.5
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.9E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0097
Cobalt
5.2
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.8E-06
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0059
Copper
11
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.8E-06
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.000094
Iron
15,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
5.1E-03
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.0073
Manganese
220
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
7.5E-05
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0031
Molybdenum
0.57
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.0E-07
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.000039
Selenium
4.0
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.4E-06
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.00027
Thallium
0.14
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
4.8E-08
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.0048
Uranium
7.7
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.6E-06
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.013
Vanadium
19
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
6.5E-06
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0013
Metals Cancer Total
7E-07
Metals Noncancer Total
0.05
Exposure Route Cancer Total
2E-05
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.05
Page 1 of 6
-------
Table C-5.4. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Kerr-McGee Ponds on United Nuclear Corporation Property
Kerr-McGee Ponds on United Nuclear Corporation Property - UNC Outdoor Worker
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer Intake0
Units
Slope Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk6
Adult
Noncancer
Intake
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Exposure Medium: Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: External Exposure
Uranium-238
2.4
pCi/g
4.9E+00
pCi/g
1.2E-10
risk/year pCi/g
6.1E-10
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
2.4
pCi/g
4.9E+00
pCi/g
2.5E-10
risk/year pCi/g
1.2E-09
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
3.4
pCi/g
7.0E+00
pCi/g
8.5E-10
risk/year pCi/g
5.9E-09
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
13
pCi/g
2.7E+01
pCi/g
8.4E-06
risk/year pCi/g
2.2E-04
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
2E-04
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route Cancer Total
2E-04
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route: Dermal Exposure
Aluminum
6,600
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
—
Arsenic
6.0
mg/kg
9.3E-08
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
1.4E-07
2.6E-07
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.00087
Barium
83
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Cadmium
0.11
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
6.4E-09
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.000064
Chromium
8.5
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Cobalt
5.2
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Copper
11
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Iron
15,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Manganese
220
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Molybdenum
0.57
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Selenium
4.0
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Thallium
0.14
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
—
Uranium
7.7
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Vanadium
19
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Metals Cancer Total
1E-07
Metals Noncancer Total
0.0009
Exposure Route Cancer Total
1E-07
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.0009
Page 2 of 6
-------
Table C-5.4. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Kerr-McGee Ponds on United Nuclear Corporation Property
Kerr-McGee Ponds on United Nuclear Corporation Property - UNC Outdoor Worker
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer Intake0
Units
Slope Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk6
Adult
Noncancer
Intake
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Exposure Medium: Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Inhalation of Particulates
Uranium-238
2.4
pCi/g
6.1E-03
pCi
2.4E-08
risk/pCi
1.4E-10
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
2.4
pCi/g
6.1E-03
pCi
2.8E-08
risk/pCi
1.7E-10
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
3.4
pCi/g
8.6E-03
pCi
3.4E-08
risk/pCi
2.9E-10
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
13
pCi/g
3.3E-02
pCi
5.9E-08
risk/pCi
1.9E-09
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
3E-09
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
6,600
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3y1
—
9.1E-08
mg/m3
5.0E-03
mg/m3
0.000018
Arsenic
6.0
mg/kg
3.0E-08
ug/m3
4.3E-03
(ug/m3y1
1.3E-10
8.3E-11
mg/m3
1.5E-05
mg/m3
0.0000055
Barium
83
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
1.1E-09
mg/m3
5.0E-04
mg/m3
0.0000023
Cadmium
0.11
mg/kg
5.4E-10
ug/m3
1.8E-03
(ug/m3)"1
9.8E-13
1.5E-12
mg/m3
1.0E-05
mg/m3
0.00000015
Chromium
8.5
mg/kg
4.5E-09
ug/m3
8.4E-02
(ug/m3)"1
3.8E-10
2.0E-09
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.000020
Cobalt
5.2
mg/kg
2.6E-08
ug/m3
9.0E-03
(ug/m3)"1
2.3E-10
7.2E-11
mg/m3
6.0E-06
mg/m3
0.000012
Copper
11
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Iron
15,000
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Manganese
220
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
3.0E-09
mg/m3
5.0E-05
mg/m3
0.000061
Molybdenum
0.57
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
7.9E-12
mg/m3
2.0E-03
mg/m3
0.0000000039
Selenium
4.0
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
5.5E-11
mg/m3
2.0E-02
mg/m3
0.0000000028
Thallium
0.14
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Uranium
7.7
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
1.1E-10
mg/m3
4.0E-05
mg/m3
0.0000027
Vanadium
19
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
2.6E-10
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.0000026
Metals Cancer Total
7E-10
Metals Noncancer Total
0.0001
Exposure Route Cancer Total
3E-09
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.0001
Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs) Receptor Cancer Risk Total
2E-04
Receptor/Media Noncancer Hazard Total
0.05
Page 3 of 6
-------
Table C-5.4. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Kerr-McGee Ponds on United Nuclear Corporation Property
Kerr-McGee Ponds on United Nuclear Corporation Property - UNC Outdoor Worker
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer Intake0
Units
Slope Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk6
Adult
Noncancer
Intake
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Exposure Medium: Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Incidental Soil In
gestion
Uranium-238
52
pCi/g
1.3E+04
pCi/g
1.3E-10
risk/pCi/g
1.7E-06
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
49
pCi/g
1.2E+04
pCi/g
1.5E-10
risk/pCi/g
1.8E-06
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
3.4
pCi/g
8.5E+02
pCi/g
1.7E-10
risk/pCi/g
1.4E-07
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
12
pCi/g
3.0E+03
pCi/g
5.7E-09
risk/pCi/g
1.7E-05
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
2E-05
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
6,600
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.3E-03
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.0023
Arsenic
5.8
mg/kg
4.3E-07
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
6.4E-07
1.2E-06
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0040
Barium
75
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.6E-05
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.00013
Cadmium
0.093
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.2E-08
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.00032
Chromium
8.1
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.8E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0092
Cobalt
5.2
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.8E-06
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0059
Copper
10
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.4E-06
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.000084
Iron
15,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
5.1E-03
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.0073
Manganese
220
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
7.5E-05
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0031
Molybdenum
0.63
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.2E-07
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.000043
Selenium
3.7
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.3E-06
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.00025
Thallium
0.14
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
4.8E-08
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.0048
Uranium
25
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
8.6E-06
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0428
Vanadium
18
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
6.2E-06
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0012
Metals Cancer Total
6E-07
Metals Noncancer Total
0.08
Exposure Route Cancer Total
2E-05
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.08
Page 4 of 6
-------
Table C-5.4. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Kerr-McGee Ponds on United Nuclear Corporation Property
Kerr-McGee Ponds on United Nuclear Corporation Property - UNC Outdoor Worker
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer Intake0
Units
Slope Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk6
Adult
Noncancer
Intake
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Exposure Medium: Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: External Exposure
Uranium-238
52
pCi/g
1.1E+02
pCi/g
1.2E-10
risk/year pCi/g
1.3E-08
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
49
pCi/g
1.0E+02
pCi/g
2.5E-10
risk/year pCi/g
2.5E-08
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
3.4
pCi/g
7.0E+00
pCi/g
8.5E-10
risk/year pCi/g
5.9E-09
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
12
pCi/g
2.5E+01
pCi/g
8.4E-06
risk/year pCi/g
2.1E-04
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
2E-04
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route Cancer Total
2E-04
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route: Dermal Exposure
Aluminum
6,600
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
—
Arsenic
5.8
mg/kg
9.0E-08
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
1.3E-07
2.5E-07
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.00084
Barium
75
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Cadmium
0.093
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
5.4E-09
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.000054
Chromium
8.1
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Cobalt
5.2
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Copper
10
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Iron
15,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Manganese
220
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Molybdenum
0.63
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Selenium
3.7
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Thallium
0.14
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
—
Uranium
25
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Vanadium
18
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Metals Cancer Total
1E-07
Metals Noncancer Total
0.0009
Exposure Route Cancer Total
1E-07
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.0009
Page 5 of 6
-------
Table C-5.4. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Kerr-McGee Ponds on United Nuclear Corporation Property
Kerr-McGee Ponds on United Nuclear Corporation Property - UNC Outdoor Worker
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer Intake0
Units
Slope Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk6
Adult
Noncancer
lntakec
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Exposure Medium: Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Inhalation of Particulates
Uranium-238
52
pCi/g
1.3E-01
pCi
2.4E-08
risk/pCi
3.1E-09
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
49
pCi/g
1.2E-01
pCi
2.8E-08
risk/pCi
3.4E-09
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
3.4
pCi/g
8.6E-03
pCi
3.4E-08
risk/pCi
2.9E-10
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
12
pCi/g
3.0E-02
pCi
5.9E-08
risk/pCi
1.8E-09
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
9E-09
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
6,600
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3y1
—
9.1E-08
mg/m3
5.0E-03
mg/m3
0.000018
Arsenic
5.8
mg/kg
2.9E-08
ug/m3
4.3E-03
(ug/m3y1
1.2E-10
8.0E-11
mg/m3
1.5E-05
mg/m3
0.0000053
Barium
75
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
1.0E-09
mg/m3
5.0E-04
mg/m3
0.0000021
Cadmium
0.093
mg/kg
4.6E-10
ug/m3
1.8E-03
(ug/m3)"1
8.3E-13
1.3E-12
mg/m3
1.0E-05
mg/m3
0.00000013
Chromium
8.1
mg/kg
4.3E-09
ug/m3
8.4E-02
(ug/m3)"1
3.6E-10
1.9E-09
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.000019
Cobalt
5.2
mg/kg
2.6E-08
ug/m3
9.0E-03
(ug/m3)"1
2.3E-10
7.2E-11
mg/m3
6.0E-06
mg/m3
0.000012
Copper
10
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Iron
15,000
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Manganese
220
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
3.0E-09
mg/m3
5.0E-05
mg/m3
0.000061
Molybdenum
0.63
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
8.7E-12
mg/m3
2.0E-03
mg/m3
0.0000000044
Selenium
3.7
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
5.1E-11
mg/m3
2.0E-02
mg/m3
0.0000000026
Thallium
0.14
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Uranium
25
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
3.5E-10
mg/m3
4.0E-05
mg/m3
0.0000086
Vanadium
18
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
2.5E-10
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.0000025
Metals Cancer Total
7E-10
Metals Noncancer Total
0.0001
Exposure Route Cancer Total
9E-09
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.0001
Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs) Receptor Cancer Risk Total
2E-04
Receptor/Media Noncancer Hazard Total
0.08
Notes:
a COPCs are the constituents of interest with a maximum detected concentration exceeding the COPC screening level (see Table C-1).
b EPCs are provided on Table C-4.
c The intakes are the EPC multiplied by the exposure parameters and any applicable contaminant-specific inputs (see Table C-3 for exposure inputs, Table 4 of the NAUM risk assessment methodology [USEPA 2024b] report for contaminant-specific inputs,
and Appendix B of the NAUM risk assessment methodology [USEPA 2024b] report for equations).
d The toxicity values are provided in Table 4 of the NAUM risk assessment methodology (USEPA 2024b).
e The cancer risk for each contaminant for each exposure pathway is calculated by multiplying the cancer intake value with the toxicity value as follows: For contaminant i: Risk, = Cancer Intake, x Toxicity Factor,
f The noncancer hazard for each contaminant for each exposure pathway is calculated by dividing the noncancer intake value by the toxicity value as follows: For contaminant i: Hazard, = Noncancer Intake, / Toxicity Factor,
-
Not applicable
NAUM
Navajo abandoned uranium mine
Mg/m3
Microgram per cubic meter
pCi
Picocurie
bgs
Below ground surface
pCi/g
Picocurie per gram
COPC
Contaminant of potential concern
RfC
Reference concentration
EPC
Exposure point concentration
RfD
Reference dose
mg/kg
Milligram per kilogram
SE
Secular equilbrium
mg/kg-day
Milligram per kilogram per day
UNC
United Nuclear Corporation
mg/m3
Milligram per cubic meter
USEPA
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Reference:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2024b. "Navajo Abandoned Uranium Mines Risk Assessment Methodology." Draft Final. March.
Page 6 of 6
-------
Table C-5.5. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Arroyos on the Navajo Nation
Arroyos on the Navajo Nation - Kpp ei doo nahaazah dah (Difficult Access Open Space)
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer
lntakec
Units
Slope
Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk6
Adult
Noncancer
Intake0
Units
RfD/
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Child
Noncancer
Intake0
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Child
Exposure Medium: Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs
Exposure Route: Incidental Soil Ingestion
Uranium-238
—
pCi/g
—
pCi/g
1.3E-10
risk/pCi/g
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
—
pCi/g
—
pCi/g
1.5E-10
risk/pCi/g
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
—
pCi/g
—
pCi/g
1.7E-10
risk/pCi/g
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
1.3
pCi/g
4.4E+01
pCi/g
5.7E-09
risk/pCi/g
2.5E-07
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
3E-07
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
4,700
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
7.1E-05
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.000071
4.4E-04
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.00044
Arsenic
11
mg/kg
1.4E-07
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
2.1E-07
1.0E-07
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.00034
6.2E-07
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0021
Barium
74
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.1E-06
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.0000056
6.9E-06
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.000034
Cadmium
0.064
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
9.6E-10
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.000010
6.0E-09
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.000060
Chromium
6.7
mg/kg
3.9E-07
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
1.9E-07
1.0E-07
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.000034
6.2E-07
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.00021
Cobalt
4.0
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
6.0E-08
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.00020
3.7E-07
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0012
Copper
5.1
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
7.7E-08
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0000019
4.7E-07
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.000012
Iron
12,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.8E-04
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.00026
1.1E-03
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.0016
Manganese
200
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.0E-06
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.00013
1.9E-05
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.00078
Molybdenum
0.81
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.2E-08
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0000024
7.5E-08
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.000015
Selenium
1.5
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.3E-08
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0000045
1.4E-07
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.000028
Thallium
0.092
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.4E-09
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.00014
8.6E-09
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.00086
Uranium
2.9
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
4.4E-08
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.00022
2.7E-07
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0013
Vanadium
25
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.8E-07
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.000075
2.3E-06
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.00047
Metals Cancer Total
4E-07
Metals Noncancer Total
0.001
Metals Noncancer Total
0.009
Exposure Route Cancer Total
7E-07
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.001
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.009
Page 1 of 11
-------
Table C-5.5. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Arroyos on the Navajo Nation
Arroyos on the Navajo Nation - Kpp ei doo nahaazah dah (Difficult Access Open Space)
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer
lntakec
Units
Slope
Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk6
Adult
Noncancer
Intake0
Units
RfD/
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Child
Noncancer
Intake0
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Child
Exposure Medium: Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs
Exposure Route: External Exposure
Uranium-238
—
pCi/g
—
pCi/g
1.2E-10
risk/year pCi/g
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
—
pCi/g
—
pCi/g
2.5E-10
risk/year pCi/g
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
—
pCi/g
—
pCi/g
8.5E-10
risk/year pCi/g
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
1.3
pCi/g
3.0E-01
pCi/g
8.4E-06
risk/year pCi/g
2.5E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
3E-06
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route Cancer Total
3E-06
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route: Dermal Exposure
Aluminum
4,700
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
—
Arsenic
11
mg/kg
2.0E-07
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
3.0E-07
1.4E-07
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.00048
8.6E-07
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0029
Barium
74
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Cadmium
0.064
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.1E-09
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.000011
6.4E-09
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.000064
Chromium
6.7
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Cobalt
4.0
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Copper
5
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Iron
12,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Manganese
200
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Molybdenum
0.81
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Selenium
1.5
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Thallium
0.092
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
—
Uranium
2.90
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Vanadium
25
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Metals Cancer Total
3E-07
Metals Noncancer Total
0.0005
Metals Noncancer Total
0.003
Exposure Route Cancer Total
3E-07
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.0005
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.003
Page 2 of 11
-------
Table C-5.5. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Arroyos on the Navajo Nation
Arroyos on the Navajo Nation - Kpp ei doo nahaazah dah (Difficult Access Open Space)
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer
lntakec
Units
Slope
Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk6
Adult
Noncancer
Intake0
Units
RfD/
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Child
Noncancer
Intake0
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Child
Exposure Medium: Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs
Exposure Route: Inhalation of Particulates
Uranium-238
—
pCi/g
—
pCi
2.4E-08
risk/pCi
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
—
pCi/g
—
pCi
2.8E-08
risk/pCi
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
—
pCi/g
—
pCi
3.4E-08
risk/pCi
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
1.3
pCi/g
1.1E-01
pCi
5.9E-08
risk/pCi
6.7E-09
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
7E-09
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
4,700
mg/kg
--
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3y1
—
6.1E-07
mg/m3
5.0E-03
mg/m3
0.00012
6.1E-07
mg/m3
5.0E-03
mg/m3
0.00012
Arsenic
11
mg/kg
1.4E-06
ug/m3
4.3E-03
(ug/m3y1
6.1E-09
1.4E-09
mg/m3
1.5E-05
mg/m3
0.000095
1.4E-09
mg/m3
1.5E-05
mg/m3
0.000095
Barium
74
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
9.6E-09
mg/m3
5.0E-04
mg/m3
0.000019
9.6E-09
mg/m3
5.0E-04
mg/m3
0.000019
Cadmium
0.064
mg/kg
8.3E-09
ug/m3
1.8E-03
(ug/m3)"1
1.5E-11
8.3E-12
mg/m3
1.0E-05
mg/m3
0.00000083
8.3E-12
mg/m3
1.0E-05
mg/m3
0.00000083
Chromium
6.7
mg/kg
1.4E-06
ug/m3
8.4E-02
(ug/m3)"1
1.2E-07
8.7E-10
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.0000087
8.7E-10
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.0000087
Cobalt
4.0
mg/kg
5.2E-07
ug/m3
9.0E-03
(ug/m3)"1
4.7E-09
5.2E-10
mg/m3
6.0E-06
mg/m3
0.000087
5.2E-10
mg/m3
6.0E-06
mg/m3
0.000087
Copper
5
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Iron
12,000
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Manganese
200
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
2.6E-08
mg/m3
5.0E-05
mg/m3
0.00052
2.6E-08
mg/m3
5.0E-05
mg/m3
0.00052
Molybdenum
0.81
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
1.1E-10
mg/m3
2.0E-03
mg/m3
0.000000053
1.1E-10
mg/m3
2.0E-03
mg/m3
0.000000053
Selenium
1.5
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
2.0E-10
mg/m3
2.0E-02
mg/m3
0.000000010
2.0E-10
mg/m3
2.0E-02
mg/m3
0.000000010
Thallium
0.092
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Uranium
2.90
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
3.8E-10
mg/m3
4.0E-05
mg/m3
0.0000094
3.8E-10
mg/m3
4.0E-05
mg/m3
0.0000094
Vanadium
25
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
3.3E-09
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.000033
3.3E-09
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.000033
Metals Cancer Total
1E-07
Metals Noncancer Total
0.0009
Metals Noncancer Total
0.0009
Exposure Route Cancer Total
1E-07
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.0009
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.0009
Exposure Medium: Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Plant Consumption
Uranium-238
—
pCi/g
—
pCi/g
8.7E-11
risk/pCi/g
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
—
pCi/g
—
pCi/g
9.6E-11
risk/pCi/g
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
—
pCi/g
—
pCi/g
1.2E-10
risk/pCi/g
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
1.3
pCi/g
9.4E+03
pCi/g
3.7E-09
risk/pCi/g
3.5E-05
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
3E-05
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
4,700
mg/kg
--
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)-1
—
3.7E-03
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.0037
9.9E-03
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.010
Arsenic
11
mg/kg
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-dayy1
1.6E-05
9.1E-06
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.030
2.4E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.081
Barium
74
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
9.6E-05
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.00048
2.5E-04
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.0013
Cadmium
0.064
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.9E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0019
5.0E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0050
Chromium
6.7
mg/kg
1.3E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
6.3E-06
5.4E-06
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0018
1.4E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0048
Cobalt
4.0
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
4.4E-06
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.015
1.2E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.039
Copper
5
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
4.0E-05
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0010
1.1E-04
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0027
Iron
12,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
--
9.5E-03
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.014
2.5E-02
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.036
Manganese
200
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.0E-03
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.043
2.8E-03
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.12
Molybdenum
0.81
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
4.1E-06
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.00083
1.1E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0023
Selenium
1.5
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.7E-06
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.00033
4.2E-06
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.00084
Thallium
0.092
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
6.7E-08
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.0067
1.8E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.018
Uranium
2.90
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.5E-06
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.013
6.7E-06
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.033
Vanadium
25
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.1E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0041
5.5E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.011
Metals Cancer Total
2E-05
Metals Noncancer Total
0.1
Metals Noncancer Total
0.4
Exposure Route Cancer Total
6E-05
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.1
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.4
Page 3 of 11
-------
Table C-5.5. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Arroyos on the Navajo Nation
Arroyos on the Navajo Nation - Kpp ei doo nahaazah dah (Difficult Access Open Space)
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer
lntakec
Units
Slope
Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk6
Adult
Noncancer
Intake0
Units
RfD/
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Child
Noncancer
Intake0
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Child
Exposure Medium: Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs
Exposure Route: Animal Consumption
Uranium-238
—
pCi/g
—
pCi/g
8.7E-11
risk/pCi/g
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
—
pCi/g
—
pCi/g
9.6E-11
risk/pCi/g
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
—
pCi/g
—
pCi/g
1.2E-10
risk/pCi/g
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
1.3
pCi/g
1.4E+02
pCi/g
3.7E-09
risk/pCi/g
5.3E-07
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
5E-07
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
4,700
mg/kg
--
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.4E-04
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.00034
8.9E-04
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.00089
Arsenic
11
mg/kg
1.3E-06
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
2.0E-06
1.1E-06
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0037
3.0E-06
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0099
Barium
74
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
9.6E-07
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.0000048
2.5E-06
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.000013
Cadmium
0.064
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
7.0E-10
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0000070
1.8E-09
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.000018
Chromium
6.7
mg/kg
4.2E-06
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
2.1E-06
1.8E-06
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.00061
4.9E-06
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0016
Cobalt
4.0
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
4.0E-06
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.013
1.1E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.036
Copper
5
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
4.7E-06
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.00012
1.3E-05
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.00032
Iron
12,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.1E-02
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.016
3.0E-02
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.043
Manganese
200
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
6.8E-06
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.00028
1.8E-05
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.00075
Molybdenum
0.81
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.7E-07
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.000075
9.7E-07
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.00019
Selenium
1.5
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.3E-07
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.000045
6.2E-07
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.00012
Thallium
0.092
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.7E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.017
4.7E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.047
Uranium
2.90
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
4.1E-08
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.00020
1.1E-07
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.00054
Vanadium
25
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.0E-06
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.00060
8.0E-06
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0016
Metals Cancer Total
4E-06
Metals Noncancer Total
0.05
Metals Noncancer Total
0.1
Exposure Route Cancer Total
5E-06
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.05
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.1
Exposure Medium: Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Other Dine Lifeways Plant Ingestion
Uranium-238
—
pCi/g
—
pCi/g
8.7E-11
risk/pCi/g
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
—
pCi/g
—
pCi/g
9.6E-11
risk/pCi/g
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
—
pCi/g
—
pCi/g
1.2E-10
risk/pCi/g
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
1.3
pCi/g
7.5E+04
pCi/g
3.7E-09
risk/pCi/g
2.8E-04
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
3E-04
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
4,700
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.3E-02
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.033
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
—
Arsenic
11
mg/kg
7.7E-05
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
1.2E-04
8.4E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.28
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Barium
74
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.0E-03
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.0052
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Cadmium
0.064
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.4E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.024
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Chromium
6.7
mg/kg
5.7E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
2.9E-05
4.8E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.016
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Cobalt
4.0
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
4.4E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.15
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Copper
5
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
5.6E-04
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.014
—
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Iron
12,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
--
8.4E-02
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.12
—
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Manganese
200
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.4E-02
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.57
—
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Molybdenum
0.81
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
5.5E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.011
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Selenium
1.5
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.7E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0033
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Thallium
0.092
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
5.7E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.057
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
—
Uranium
2.90
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.3E-05
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.12
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Vanadium
25
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.9E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.037
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Metals Cancer Total
1E-04
Metals Noncancer Total
1
Metals Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route Cancer Total
4E-04
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
1
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
—
Page 4 of 11
-------
Table C-5.5. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Arroyos on the Navajo Nation
Arroyos on the Navajo Nation - Kpp ei doo nahaazah dah (Difficult Access Open Space)
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer
lntakec
Units
Slope
Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk6
Adult
Noncancer
Intake0
Units
RfD/
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Child
Noncancer
Intake0
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Child
Exposure Medium: Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs
Exposure Route: Other Dine Lifeways Plant Dermal
Aluminum
4,700
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
—
Arsenic
11
mg/kg
6.5E-06
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
9.7E-06
7.0E-06
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.023
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Barium
74
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Cadmium
0.064
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.7E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0027
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Chromium
6.7
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Cobalt
4.0
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Copper
5
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Iron
12,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Manganese
200
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Molybdenum
0.81
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Selenium
1.5
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Thallium
0.092
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
—
Uranium
2.90
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Vanadium
25
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Metals Cancer Total
1E-05
Metals Noncancer Total
0.03
Metals Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route Cancer Total
1E-05
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.03
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Medium: Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Other Dine Lifeways Plant Inhalation
Uranium-238
—
pCi/g
—
pCi
2.4E-08
risk/pCi
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
—
pCi/g
—
pCi
2.8E-08
risk/pCi
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
—
pCi/g
—
pCi
3.4E-08
risk/pCi
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
1.3
pCi/g
8.1E+02
pCi
5.9E-08
risk/pCi
4.8E-05
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
5E-05
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
4,700
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
3.4E-04
mg/m3
5.0E-03
mg/m3
0.068
—
mg/m3
5.0E-03
mg/m3
—
Arsenic
11
mg/kg
7.8E-04
ug/m3
4.3E-03
(ug/m3)"1
3.4E-06
8.6E-07
mg/m3
1.5E-05
mg/m3
0.057
—
mg/m3
1.5E-05
mg/m3
—
Barium
74
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
1.0E-05
mg/m3
5.0E-04
mg/m3
0.021
—
mg/m3
5.0E-04
mg/m3
—
Cadmium
0.064
mg/kg
2.2E-05
ug/m3
1.8E-03
(ug/m3)"1
4.0E-08
2.4E-08
mg/m3
1.0E-05
mg/m3
0.0024
—
mg/m3
1.0E-05
mg/m3
—
Chromium
6.7
mg/kg
5.9E-04
ug/m3
8.4E-02
(ug/m3)"1
4.9E-05
5.0E-07
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.0050
—
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
—
Cobalt
4.0
mg/kg
4.0E-04
ug/m3
9.0E-03
(ug/m3)"1
3.6E-06
4.4E-07
mg/m3
6.0E-06
mg/m3
0.073
—
mg/m3
6.0E-06
mg/m3
—
Copper
5.1
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Iron
12,000
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Manganese
200
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
1.4E-04
mg/m3
5.0E-05
mg/m3
2.8
—
mg/m3
5.0E-05
mg/m3
—
Molybdenum
0.81
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
5.7E-07
mg/m3
2.0E-03
mg/m3
0.00028
—
mg/m3
2.0E-03
mg/m3
—
Selenium
1.5
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
1.7E-07
mg/m3
2.0E-02
mg/m3
0.0000083
—
mg/m3
2.0E-02
mg/m3
—
Thallium
0.092
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Uranium
2.90
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
2.4E-07
mg/m3
4.0E-05
mg/m3
0.0060
—
mg/m3
4.0E-05
mg/m3
—
Vanadium
25
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
1.9E-06
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.019
—
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
—
Metals Cancer Total
6E-05
Metals Noncancer Total
3
Metals Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route Cancer Total
1E-04
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
3
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
—
Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs) Receptor Cancer Risk Total
6E-04
Receptor/Media Noncancer Hazard Total
5
Receptor/Media Noncancer Hazard Total
1
Page 5 of 11
-------
Table C-5.5. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Arroyos on the Navajo Nation
Arroyos on the Navajo Nation - Kpp ei doo nahaazah dah (Difficult Access Open Space)
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer
lntakec
Units
Slope
Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk6
Adult
Noncancer
Intake0
Units
RfD/
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Child
Noncancer
Intake0
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Child
Exposure Medium: Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Incidental Soil Ingestion
Uranium-238
—
pCi/g
—
pCi/g
1.3E-10
risk/pCi/g
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
—
pCi/g
—
pCi/g
1.5E-10
risk/pCi/g
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
—
pCi/g
—
pCi/g
1.7E-10
risk/pCi/g
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
1.5
pCi/g
5.1E+01
pCi/g
5.7E-09
risk/pCi/g
2.9E-07
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
3E-07
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
4,700
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
7.1E-05
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.000071
4.4E-04
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.00044
Arsenic
11
mg/kg
1.4E-07
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
2.1E-07
1.0E-07
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.00034
6.2E-07
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0021
Barium
75
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.1E-06
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.0000056
7.0E-06
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.000035
Cadmium
0.073
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.1E-09
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.000011
6.8E-09
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.000068
Chromium
6.7
mg/kg
3.9E-07
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
1.9E-07
1.0E-07
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.000034
6.2E-07
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.00021
Cobalt
4.5
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
6.8E-08
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.00023
4.2E-07
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0014
Copper
5.1
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
7.7E-08
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0000019
4.7E-07
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.000012
Iron
15,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.3E-04
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.00032
1.4E-03
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.0020
Manganese
400
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
6.0E-06
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.00025
3.7E-05
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0016
Molybdenum
0.81
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.2E-08
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0000024
7.5E-08
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.000015
Selenium
1.5
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.3E-08
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0000045
1.4E-07
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.000028
Thallium
0.092
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.4E-09
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.00014
8.6E-09
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.00086
Uranium
2.90
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
4.4E-08
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.00022
2.7E-07
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0013
Vanadium
25
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.8E-07
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.000075
2.3E-06
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.00047
Metals Cancer Total
4E-07
Metals Noncancer Total
0.002
Metals Noncancer Total
0.01
Exposure Route Cancer Total
7E-07
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.002
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.01
Page 6 of 11
-------
Table C-5.5. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Arroyos on the Navajo Nation
Arroyos on the Navajo Nation - Kpp ei doo nahaazah dah (Difficult Access Open Space)
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer
lntakec
Units
Slope
Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk6
Adult
Noncancer
Intake0
Units
RfD/
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Child
Noncancer
Intake0
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Child
Exposure Medium: Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: External Exposure
Uranium-238
—
pCi/g
—
pCi/g
1.2E-10
risk/year pCi/g
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
—
pCi/g
—
pCi/g
2.5E-10
risk/year pCi/g
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
—
pCi/g
—
pCi/g
8.5E-10
risk/year pCi/g
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
1.5
pCi/g
3.5E-01
pCi/g
8.4E-06
risk/year pCi/g
2.9E-06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
3E-06
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route Cancer Total
3E-06
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route: Dermal Exposure
Aluminum
4,700
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
—
Arsenic
11
mg/kg
2.0E-07
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
3.0E-07
1.4E-07
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.00048
8.6E-07
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0029
Barium
75
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Cadmium
0.073
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.2E-09
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.000012
7.3E-09
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.00007
Chromium
6.7
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Cobalt
4.5
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Copper
5.1
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Iron
15,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Manganese
400
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Molybdenum
0.81
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Selenium
1.5
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Thallium
0.092
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
—
Uranium
2.90
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Vanadium
25
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Metals Cancer Total
3E-07
Metals Noncancer Total
0.0005
Metals Noncancer Total
0.003
Exposure Route Cancer Total
3E-07
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.0005
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.003
Page 7 of 11
-------
Table C-5.5. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Arroyos on the Navajo Nation
Arroyos on the Navajo Nation - Kpp ei doo nahaazah dah (Difficult Access Open Space)
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer
lntakec
Units
Slope
Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk6
Adult
Noncancer
Intake0
Units
RfD/
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Child
Noncancer
Intake0
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Child
Exposure Medium: Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Inhalation of Particulates
Uranium-238
—
pCi/g
—
pCi
2.4E-08
risk/pCi
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
—
pCi/g
—
pCi
2.8E-08
risk/pCi
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
—
pCi/g
—
pCi
3.4E-08
risk/pCi
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
1.5
pCi/g
5.1E-04
pCi
5.9E-08
risk/pCi
3.0E-11
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
3E-11
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
4,700
mg/kg
--
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3y1
—
2.4E-09
mg/m3
5.0E-03
mg/m3
0.00000049
2.4E-09
mg/m3
5.0E-03
mg/m3
0.00000049
Arsenic
11
mg/kg
5.7E-09
ug/m3
4.3E-03
(ug/m3y1
2.5E-11
5.7E-12
mg/m3
1.5E-05
mg/m3
0.00000038
5.7E-12
mg/m3
1.5E-05
mg/m3
0.00000038
Barium
75
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
3.9E-11
mg/m3
5.0E-04
mg/m3
0.000000078
3.9E-11
mg/m3
5.0E-04
mg/m3
0.000000078
Cadmium
0.073
mg/kg
3.8E-11
ug/m3
1.8E-03
(ug/m3)"1
6.8E-14
3.8E-14
mg/m3
1.0E-05
mg/m3
0.0000000038
3.8E-14
mg/m3
1.0E-05
mg/m3
0.0000000038
Chromium
6.7
mg/kg
5.6E-09
ug/m3
8.4E-02
(ug/m3)"1
4.7E-10
3.5E-12
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.000000035
3.5E-12
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.000000035
Cobalt
4.5
mg/kg
2.3E-09
ug/m3
9.0E-03
(ug/m3)"1
2.1E-11
2.3E-12
mg/m3
6.0E-06
mg/m3
0.00000039
2.3E-12
mg/m3
6.0E-06
mg/m3
0.00000039
Copper
5
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Iron
15,000
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Manganese
400
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
2.1E-10
mg/m3
5.0E-05
mg/m3
0.0000042
2.1E-10
mg/m3
5.0E-05
mg/m3
0.0000042
Molybdenum
0.81
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
4.2E-13
mg/m3
2.0E-03
mg/m3
0.00000000021
4.2E-13
mg/m3
2.0E-03
mg/m3
0.00000000021
Selenium
1.5
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
7.8E-13
mg/m3
2.0E-02
mg/m3
0.000000000039
7.8E-13
mg/m3
2.0E-02
mg/m3
0.000000000039
Thallium
0.092
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Uranium
2.90
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
1.5E-12
mg/m3
4.0E-05
mg/m3
0.000000038
1.5E-12
mg/m3
4.0E-05
mg/m3
0.000000038
Vanadium
25
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
1.3E-11
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.00000013
1.3E-11
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.00000013
Metals Cancer Total
5E-10
Metals Noncancer Total
0.000006
Metals Noncancer Total
0.000006
Exposure Route Cancer Total
5E-10
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.000006
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.000006
Exposure Medium: Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Plant Consumption
Uranium-238
—
pCi/g
—
pCi/g
8.7E-11
risk/pCi/g
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
—
pCi/g
—
pCi/g
9.6E-11
risk/pCi/g
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
—
pCi/g
—
pCi/g
1.2E-10
risk/pCi/g
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
1.5
pCi/g
1.1E+04
pCi/g
3.7E-09
risk/pCi/g
4.0E-05
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
4E-05
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
4,700
mg/kg
--
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)-1
—
3.7E-03
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.0037
9.9E-03
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.010
Arsenic
11
mg/kg
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-dayy1
1.6E-05
9.1E-06
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.030
2.4E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.081
Barium
75
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
9.8E-05
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.00049
2.6E-04
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.0013
Cadmium
0.073
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.1E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0021
5.7E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0057
Chromium
6.7
mg/kg
1.3E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
6.3E-06
5.4E-06
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0018
1.4E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0048
Cobalt
4.5
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
5.0E-06
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.017
1.3E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.044
Copper
5
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
4.0E-05
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0010
1.1E-04
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0027
Iron
15,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
--
1.2E-02
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.017
3.2E-02
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.045
Manganese
400
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.0E-03
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.085
5.6E-03
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.23
Molybdenum
0.81
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
4.1E-06
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.00083
1.1E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0023
Selenium
1.5
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.7E-06
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.00033
4.2E-06
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.00084
Thallium
0.092
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
6.7E-08
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.0067
1.8E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.018
Uranium
2.90
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.5E-06
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.013
6.7E-06
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.033
Vanadium
25
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.1E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0041
5.5E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.011
Metals Cancer Total
2E-05
Metals Noncancer Total
0.2
Metals Noncancer Total
0.5
Exposure Route Cancer Total
6E-05
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.2
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.5
Page 8 of 11
-------
Table C-5.5. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Arroyos on the Navajo Nation
Arroyos on the Navajo Nation - Kpp ei doo nahaazah dah (Difficult Access Open Space)
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer
lntakec
Units
Slope
Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk6
Adult
Noncancer
Intake0
Units
RfD/
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Child
Noncancer
Intake0
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Child
Exposure Medium: Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Animal Consumption
Uranium-238
—
pCi/g
—
pCi/g
8.7E-11
risk/pCi/g
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
—
pCi/g
—
pCi/g
9.6E-11
risk/pCi/g
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
—
pCi/g
—
pCi/g
1.2E-10
risk/pCi/g
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
1.5
pCi/g
1.7E+02
pCi/g
3.7E-09
risk/pCi/g
6.1E-07
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
6E-07
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
4,700
mg/kg
--
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.4E-04
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.00034
8.9E-04
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.00089
Arsenic
11
mg/kg
1.3E-06
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
2.0E-06
1.1E-06
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0037
3.0E-06
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0099
Barium
75
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
9.8E-07
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.0000049
2.6E-06
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.000013
Cadmium
0.073
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
8.0E-10
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0000080
2.0E-09
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.000020
Chromium
6.7
mg/kg
4.2E-06
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
2.1E-06
1.8E-06
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.00061
4.9E-06
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0016
Cobalt
4.5
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
4.5E-06
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.015
1.2E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.041
Copper
5
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
4.7E-06
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.00012
1.3E-05
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.00032
Iron
15,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.4E-02
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.020
3.8E-02
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.054
Manganese
400
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.4E-05
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.00057
3.6E-05
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0015
Molybdenum
0.81
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.7E-07
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.000075
9.7E-07
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.00019
Selenium
1.5
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.3E-07
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.000045
6.2E-07
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.00012
Thallium
0.092
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.7E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.017
4.7E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.047
Uranium
2.90
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
4.1E-08
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.00020
1.1E-07
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.00054
Vanadium
25
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.0E-06
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.00060
8.0E-06
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0016
Metals Cancer Total
4E-06
Metals Noncancer Total
0.06
Metals Noncancer Total
0.2
Exposure Route Cancer Total
5E-06
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.06
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.2
Exposure Medium: Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Other Dine Lifeways Plant Ingestion
Uranium-238
—
pCi/g
—
pCi/g
8.7E-11
risk/pCi/g
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
—
pCi/g
—
pCi/g
9.6E-11
risk/pCi/g
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
—
pCi/g
—
pCi/g
1.2E-10
risk/pCi/g
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
1.5
pCi/g
8.7E+04
pCi/g
3.7E-09
risk/pCi/g
3.2E-04
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
3E-04
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
4,700
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.3E-02
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.033
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
—
Arsenic
11
mg/kg
7.7E-05
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
1.2E-04
8.4E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.28
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Barium
75
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.1E-03
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.0053
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Cadmium
0.073
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.7E-06
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.027
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Chromium
6.700
mg/kg
5.7E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
2.9E-05
4.8E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.016
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Cobalt
4.5
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
5.0E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.17
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Copper
5
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
5.6E-04
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.014
—
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Iron
15,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
--
1.1E-01
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.15
—
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Manganese
400
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.7E-02
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
1.1
—
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Molybdenum
0.81
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
5.5E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.011
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Selenium
1.5
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.7E-05
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0033
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Thallium
0.092
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
5.7E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.057
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
—
Uranium
2.90
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.3E-05
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.12
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Vanadium
25
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.9E-04
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.037
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Metals Cancer Total
1E-04
Metals Noncancer Total
2
Metals Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route Cancer Total
5E-04
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
2
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
—
Page 9 of 11
-------
Table C-5.5. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Arroyos on the Navajo Nation
Arroyos on the Navajo Nation - Kpp ei doo nahaazah dah (Difficult Access Open Space)
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer
lntakec
Units
Slope
Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk6
Adult
Noncancer
Intake0
Units
RfD/
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Child
Noncancer
Intake0
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Child
Exposure Medium: Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Other Dine Lifeways Plant Dermal
Aluminum
4,700
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
—
Arsenic
11
mg/kg
6.5E-06
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
9.7E-06
7.0E-06
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.023
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Barium
75
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Cadmium
0.073
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.1E-07
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0031
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Chromium
6.7
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Cobalt
4.5
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Copper
5
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Iron
15,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Manganese
400
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Molybdenum
0.81
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Selenium
1.5
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Thallium
0.092
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
—
Uranium
2.90
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Vanadium
25
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Metals Cancer Total
1E-05
Metals Noncancer Total
0.03
Metals Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route Cancer Total
1E-05
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.03
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Medium: Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Other Dine Lifeways Plant Inhalation
Uranium-238
—
pCi/g
—
pCi
2.4E-08
risk/pCi
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
—
pCi/g
—
pCi
2.8E-08
risk/pCi
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
—
pCi/g
—
pCi
3.4E-08
risk/pCi
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
1.5
pCi/g
9.3E+02
pCi
5.9E-08
risk/pCi
5.5E-05
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
6E-05
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
4,700
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
3.4E-04
mg/m3
5.0E-03
mg/m3
0.068
—
mg/m3
5.0E-03
mg/m3
—
Arsenic
11
mg/kg
7.8E-04
ug/m3
4.3E-03
(ug/m3)"1
3.4E-06
8.6E-07
mg/m3
1.5E-05
mg/m3
0.057
—
mg/m3
1.5E-05
mg/m3
—
Barium
75
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
1.1E-05
mg/m3
5.0E-04
mg/m3
0.021
—
mg/m3
5.0E-04
mg/m3
—
Cadmium
0.073
mg/kg
2.6E-05
ug/m3
1.8E-03
(ug/m3)"1
4.6E-08
2.8E-08
mg/m3
1.0E-05
mg/m3
0.0028
—
mg/m3
1.0E-05
mg/m3
—
Chromium
6.7
mg/kg
5.9E-04
ug/m3
8.4E-02
(ug/m3)"1
4.9E-05
5.0E-07
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.0050
—
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
—
Cobalt
4.5
mg/kg
4.5E-04
ug/m3
9.0E-03
(ug/m3)"1
4.1E-06
5.0E-07
mg/m3
6.0E-06
mg/m3
0.083
—
mg/m3
6.0E-06
mg/m3
—
Copper
5
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Iron
15,000
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Manganese
400
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
2.8E-04
mg/m3
5.0E-05
mg/m3
5.6
—
mg/m3
5.0E-05
mg/m3
—
Molybdenum
0.81
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
5.7E-07
mg/m3
2.0E-03
mg/m3
0.00028
—
mg/m3
2.0E-03
mg/m3
—
Selenium
1.5
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
1.7E-07
mg/m3
2.0E-02
mg/m3
0.0000083
—
mg/m3
2.0E-02
mg/m3
—
Thallium
0.092
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Uranium
2.90
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
2.4E-07
mg/m3
4.0E-05
mg/m3
0.0060
—
mg/m3
4.0E-05
mg/m3
—
Vanadium
25
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
1.9E-06
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.019
—
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
—
Metals Cancer Total
6E-05
Metals Noncancer Total
6
Metals Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route Cancer Total
1E-04
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
6
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
—
Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs) Receptor Cancer Risk Total
7E-04
Receptor/Media Noncancer Hazard Total
8
Receptor/Media Noncancer Hazard Total
0.7
Page 10 of 11
-------
Table C-5.5. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Arroyos on the Navajo Nation
Notes:
a COPCs are the constituents of interest with a maximum detected concentration exceeding the COPC screening level (see Table C-1).
b EPCs are provided on Table C-4.
c The intakes are the EPC multiplied by the exposure parameters and any applicable contaminant-specific inputs (see Table C-3 for exposure inputs, Table 4 of the NAUM risk assessment methodology [USEPA 2024b] report for contaminant-specific inputs,
and Appendix B of the NAUM risk assessment methodology [USEPA 2024b] report for equations).
d The toxicity values are provided in Table 4 of the NAUM risk assessment methodology (USEPA 2024b).
e The cancer risk for each contaminant for each exposure pathway is calculated by multiplying the cancer intake value with the toxicity value as follows: For contaminant i: Risk, = Cancer Intake, x Toxicity Factor,
f The noncancer hazard for each contaminant for each exposure pathway is calculated by dividing the noncancer intake value by the toxicity value as follows: For contaminant i: Hazard, = Noncancer Intake, / Toxicity Factor,
COPC
EPC
mg/kg
|jg/m3
bgs
mg/kg-day
mg/m3
Not applicable
Microgram per cubic meter
Below ground surface
Contaminant of potential concern
Exposure point concentration
Milligram per kilogram
Milligram per kilogram per day
Milligram per cubic meter
pCi
pCi/g
RfC
RfD
SE
NAUM
USEPA
Navajo abandoned uranium mine
Picocurie
Picocurie per gram
Reference concentration
Reference dose
Secular equilbrium
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Reference:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2024b. "Navajo Abandoned Uranium Mines Risk Assessment Methodology." Draft Final. March.
Page 11 of 11
-------
Table C-5.6. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Arroyos on United Nuclear Corporation Property
Arroyos on United Nuclear Corporation Property - UNC Outdoor Worker
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer Intake0
Units
Slope Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk6
Adult
Noncancer
Intake
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Exposure Medium: Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Incidental Soil In
gestion
Uranium-238
—
pCi/g
—
pCi/g
1.3E-10
risk/pCi/g
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
—
pCi/g
—
pCi/g
1.5E-10
risk/pCi/g
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
—
pCi/g
—
pCi/g
1.7E-10
risk/pCi/g
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
1.1
pCi/g
2.8E+02
pCi/g
5.7E-09
risk/pCi/g
1.6E-06
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
2E-06
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
4,400
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.5E-03
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.0015
Arsenic
4.6
mg/kg
3.4E-07
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
5.1E-07
9.5E-07
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0032
Barium
48
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.6E-05
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.000082
Cadmium
0.054
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.8E-08
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.00018
Chromium
5.0
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.7E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0057
Cobalt
4.4
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.5E-06
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0050
Copper
4.7
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.6E-06
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.000040
Iron
13,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
4.5E-03
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.0064
Manganese
240
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
8.2E-05
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0034
Molybdenum
0.28
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
9.6E-08
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.000019
Selenium
1.1
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.8E-07
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.000075
Thallium
0.057
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.0E-08
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.0020
Uranium
0.091
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.1E-08
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.00016
Vanadium
0.53
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.8E-07
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.000036
Metals Cancer Total
5E-07
Metals Noncancer Total
0.03
Exposure Route Cancer Total
2E-06
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.03
Page 1 of 6
-------
Table C-5.6. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Arroyos on United Nuclear Corporation Property
Arroyos on United Nuclear Corporation Property - UNC Outdoor Worker
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer Intake0
Units
Slope Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk6
Adult
Noncancer
Intake
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Exposure Medium: Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: External Exposure
Uranium-238
—
pCi/g
—
pCi/g
1.2E-10
risk/year pCi/g
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
—
pCi/g
—
pCi/g
2.5E-10
risk/year pCi/g
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
—
pCi/g
—
pCi/g
8.5E-10
risk/year pCi/g
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
1.1
pCi/g
2.3E+00
pCi/g
8.4E-06
risk/year pCi/g
1.9E-05
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
2E-05
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route Cancer Total
2E-05
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route: Dermal Exposure
Aluminum
4,400
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
—
Arsenic
4.6
mg/kg
7.1E-08
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
1.1E-07
2.0E-07
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.00067
Barium
48
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Cadmium
0.054
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.1E-09
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.000031
Chromium
5.0
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Cobalt
4.4
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Copper
4.7
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Iron
13,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Manganese
240
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Molybdenum
0.28
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Selenium
1.1
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Thallium
0.057
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
—
Uranium
0.091
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Vanadium
0.53
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Metals Cancer Total
1E-07
Metals Noncancer Total
0.0007
Exposure Route Cancer Total
1E-07
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.0007
Page 2 of 6
-------
Table C-5.6. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Arroyos on United Nuclear Corporation Property
Arroyos on United Nuclear Corporation Property - UNC Outdoor Worker
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer Intake0
Units
Slope Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk6
Adult
Noncancer
Intake
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Exposure Medium: Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Inhalation of Particulates
Uranium-238
—
pCi/g
—
pCi
2.4E-08
risk/pCi
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
—
pCi/g
—
pCi
2.8E-08
risk/pCi
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
—
pCi/g
—
pCi
3.4E-08
risk/pCi
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
1.1
pCi/g
2.8E-03
pCi
5.9E-08
risk/pCi
1.6E-10
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
2E-10
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
4,400
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3y1
—
6.1E-08
mg/m3
5.0E-03
mg/m3
0.000012
Arsenic
4.6
mg/kg
2.3E-08
ug/m3
4.3E-03
(ug/m3y1
9.8E-11
6.4E-11
mg/m3
1.5E-05
mg/m3
0.0000042
Barium
48
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
6.6E-10
mg/m3
5.0E-04
mg/m3
0.0000013
Cadmium
0.054
mg/kg
2.7E-10
ug/m3
1.8E-03
(ug/m3)"1
4.8E-13
7.5E-13
mg/m3
1.0E-05
mg/m3
0.000000075
Chromium
5.0
mg/kg
2.6E-09
ug/m3
8.4E-02
(ug/m3)"1
2.2E-10
1.2E-09
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.000012
Cobalt
4.4
mg/kg
2.2E-08
ug/m3
9.0E-03
(ug/m3)"1
2.0E-10
6.1E-11
mg/m3
6.0E-06
mg/m3
0.000010
Copper
4.7
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Iron
13,000
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Manganese
240
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
3.3E-09
mg/m3
5.0E-05
mg/m3
0.000066
Molybdenum
0.28
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
3.9E-12
mg/m3
2.0E-03
mg/m3
0.0000000019
Selenium
1.1
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
1.5E-11
mg/m3
2.0E-02
mg/m3
0.00000000076
Thallium
0.057
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Uranium
0.091
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
1.3E-12
mg/m3
4.0E-05
mg/m3
0.000000031
Vanadium
0.53
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
7.3E-12
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.000000073
Metals Cancer Total
5E-10
Metals Noncancer Total
0.0001
Exposure Route Cancer Total
7E-10
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.0001
Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs) Receptor Cancer Risk Total
2E-05
Receptor/Media Noncancer Hazard Total
0.03
Page 3 of 6
-------
Table C-5.6. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Arroyos on United Nuclear Corporation Property
Arroyos on United Nuclear Corporation Property - UNC Outdoor Worker
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer Intake0
Units
Slope Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk6
Adult
Noncancer
Intake
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Exposure Medium: Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Incidental Soil In
gestion
Uranium-238
—
pCi/g
—
pCi/g
1.3E-10
risk/pCi/g
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
—
pCi/g
—
pCi/g
1.5E-10
risk/pCi/g
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
—
pCi/g
—
pCi/g
1.7E-10
risk/pCi/g
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
1.1
pCi/g
2.8E+02
pCi/g
5.7E-09
risk/pCi/g
1.6E-06
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
2E-06
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
4,700
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.6E-03
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
0.0016
Arsenic
4.8
mg/kg
3.5E-07
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
5.3E-07
9.9E-07
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0033
Barium
62
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.1E-05
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.00011
Cadmium
0.055
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.9E-08
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.00019
Chromium
5.0
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.7E-05
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.0057
Cobalt
4.4
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.5E-06
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0050
Copper
5.4
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
1.8E-06
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
0.000046
Iron
15,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
5.1E-03
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
0.0073
Manganese
280
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
9.6E-05
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0040
Molybdenum
0.28
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
9.6E-08
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.000019
Selenium
1.1
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.8E-07
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.000075
Thallium
0.059
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.0E-08
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
0.0020
Uranium
0.091
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.1E-08
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.00016
Vanadium
0.62
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
2.1E-07
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
0.000042
Metals Cancer Total
5E-07
Metals Noncancer Total
0.03
Exposure Route Cancer Total
2E-06
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.03
Page 4 of 6
-------
Table C-5.6. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Arroyos on United Nuclear Corporation Property
Arroyos on United Nuclear Corporation Property - UNC Outdoor Worker
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer Intake0
Units
Slope Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk6
Adult
Noncancer
Intake
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Exposure Medium: Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: External Exposure
Uranium-238
—
pCi/g
—
pCi/g
1.2E-10
risk/year pCi/g
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
—
pCi/g
—
pCi/g
2.5E-10
risk/year pCi/g
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
—
pCi/g
—
pCi/g
8.5E-10
risk/year pCi/g
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
1.1
pCi/g
2.3E+00
pCi/g
8.4E-06
risk/year pCi/g
1.9E-05
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
2E-05
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route Cancer Total
2E-05
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
—
Exposure Route: Dermal Exposure
Aluminum
4,700
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E+00
mg/kg-day
—
Arsenic
4.8
mg/kg
7.4E-08
mg/kg-day
1.5E+00
(mg/kg-day)"1
1.1E-07
2.1E-07
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.00069
Barium
62
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Cadmium
0.055
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
3.2E-09
mg/kg-day
1.0E-04
mg/kg-day
0.000032
Chromium
5.0
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-01
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Cobalt
4.4
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
3.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Copper
5.4
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
4.0E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Iron
15,000
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
7.0E-01
mg/kg-day
—
Manganese
280
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.4E-02
mg/kg-day
—
Molybdenum
0.28
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Selenium
1.1
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Thallium
0.059
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
1.0E-05
mg/kg-day
—
Uranium
0.091
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
2.0E-04
mg/kg-day
—
Vanadium
0.62
mg/kg
—
mg/kg-day
—
(mg/kg-day)"1
—
—
mg/kg-day
5.0E-03
mg/kg-day
—
Metals Cancer Total
1E-07
Metals Noncancer Total
0.0007
Exposure Route Cancer Total
1E-07
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.0007
Page 5 of 6
-------
Table C-5.6. Human Health Risk and Hazard Calculations - Arroyos on United Nuclear Corporation Property
Arroyos on United Nuclear Corporation Property - UNC Outdoor Worker
COPCa
EPCb
Units
Cancer Intake0
Units
Slope Factor/
Unit Riskd
Units
Cancer
Risk6
Adult
Noncancer
lntakec
Units
RfD /
RfCd
Units
Noncancer
Hazardf
Adult
Exposure Medium: Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs)
Exposure Route: Inhalation of Particulates
Uranium-238
—
pCi/g
—
pCi
2.4E-08
risk/pCi
—
—
—
—
—
—
Uranium-234
—
pCi/g
—
pCi
2.8E-08
risk/pCi
—
—
—
—
—
—
Thorium-230
—
pCi/g
—
pCi
3.4E-08
risk/pCi
—
—
—
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
1.1
pCi/g
2.8E-03
pCi
5.9E-08
risk/pCi
1.6E-10
—
—
—
—
—
Radionuclide Cancer Total
2E-10
Radionuclide Noncancer Total
—
Aluminum
4,700
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3y1
—
6.5E-08
mg/m3
5.0E-03
mg/m3
0.000013
Arsenic
4.8
mg/kg
2.4E-08
ug/m3
4.3E-03
(ug/m3y1
1.0E-10
6.6E-11
mg/m3
1.5E-05
mg/m3
0.0000044
Barium
62
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
8.6E-10
mg/m3
5.0E-04
mg/m3
0.0000017
Cadmium
0.055
mg/kg
2.7E-10
ug/m3
1.8E-03
(ug/m3)"1
4.9E-13
7.6E-13
mg/m3
1.0E-05
mg/m3
0.000000076
Chromium
5.0
mg/kg
2.6E-09
ug/m3
8.4E-02
(ug/m3)"1
2.2E-10
1.2E-09
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.000012
Cobalt
4.4
mg/kg
2.2E-08
ug/m3
9.0E-03
(ug/m3)"1
2.0E-10
6.1E-11
mg/m3
6.0E-06
mg/m3
0.000010
Copper
5.4
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Iron
15,000
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Manganese
280
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
3.9E-09
mg/m3
5.0E-05
mg/m3
0.000077
Molybdenum
0.28
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
3.9E-12
mg/m3
2.0E-03
mg/m3
0.0000000019
Selenium
1.1
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
1.5E-11
mg/m3
2.0E-02
mg/m3
0.00000000076
Thallium
0.059
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
—
mg/m3
—
mg/m3
—
Uranium
0.091
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
1.3E-12
mg/m3
4.0E-05
mg/m3
0.000000031
Vanadium
0.62
mg/kg
—
ug/m3
—
(ug/m3)"1
—
8.6E-12
mg/m3
1.0E-04
mg/m3
0.000000086
Metals Cancer Total
5E-10
Metals Noncancer Total
0.0001
Exposure Route Cancer Total
7E-10
Exposure Route Noncancer Total
0.0001
Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs) Receptor Cancer Risk Total
2E-05
Receptor/Media Noncancer Hazard Total
0.03
Notes:
a COPCs are the constituents of interest with a maximum detected concentration exceeding the COPC screening level (see Table C-1).
b EPCs are provided on Table C-4.
c The intakes are the EPC multiplied by the exposure parameters and any applicable contaminant-specific inputs (see Table C-3 for exposure inputs, Table 4 of the NAUM risk assessment methodology [USEPA 2024b] report for contaminant-specific inputs,
and Appendix B of the NAUM risk assessment methodology [USEPA 2024b] report for equations).
d The toxicity values are provided in Table 4 of the NAUM risk assessment methodology (USEPA 2024b).
e The cancer risk for each contaminant for each exposure pathway is calculated by multiplying the cancer intake value with the toxicity value as follows: For contaminant i: Risk, = Cancer Intake, x Toxicity Factor,
f The noncancer hazard for each contaminant for each exposure pathway is calculated by dividing the noncancer intake value by the toxicity value as follows: For contaminant i: Hazard, = Noncancer Intake, / Toxicity Factor,
-
Not applicable
NAUM
Navajo abandoned uranium mine
Mg/m3
Microgram per cubic meter
pCi
Picocurie
bgs
Below ground surface
pCi/g
Picocurie per gram
COPC
Contaminant of potential concern
RfC
Reference concentration
EPC
Exposure point concentration
RfD
Reference dose
Kerr-McGee
Kerr-McGee Corporation
SE
Secular equilbrium
mg/kg
Milligram per kilogram
UNC
United Nuclear Corporation
mg/kg-day
Milligram per kilogram per day
USEPA
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
mg/m3
Milligram per cubic meter
Reference:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2024b. "Navajo Abandoned Uranium Mines Risk Assessment Methodology." Draft Final. March.
Page 6 of 6
-------
Table C-6. Human Health Risk and Hazard Summary by Exposure Pathway
Church Rock Mine No. 1 - Kee'da'whn teeh (Full-Time Resident)
COPC
EPC
Units
Incidental Soil Ingestion
External Exposure /
Dermal Contact
Inhalation of Particulates
Plant Consumption
Animal Consumption
ODL Plant Ingestion
ODL Plant Dermal
ODL Plant Inhalation
Total Risk or Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
Uranium-238
1.1
pCi/g
1.4E-06
-
-
7.0E-09
-
-
2.3E-09
-
-
6.8E-06
-
-
7.7E-06
-
-
3.1E-06
-
-
-
-
-
6.0E-06
-
-
3E-05
-
-
Uranium-234
1.2
pCi/g
1.7E-06
-
-
1.5E-08
-
-
2.9E-09
-
-
8.1E-06
-
-
9.3E-06
-
-
3.8E-06
-
-
-
-
-
7.7E-06
-
-
3E-05
-
-
Thorium-230
1.7
pCi/g
2.7E-06
-
-
7.3E-08
-
-
5.0E-09
-
-
3.6E-06
-
-
7.9E-09
-
-
2.0E-06
-
-
-
-
-
2.6E-06
-
-
1E-05
-
-
Radium-226 in SE
6.7
pCi/g
3.6E-04
-
-
2.9E-03
-
-
3.5E-08
-
-
2.7E-03
-
-
5.2E-03
-
-
1.5E-03
-
-
-
-
-
2.5E-04
-
-
1E-02
-
-
Aluminum
4,600
mg/kg
-
0.020
0.12
-
-
-
-
0.00012
0.00012
-
0.055
0.14
-
0.0032
0.0087
-
0.033
-
-
-
-
-
0.066
-
-
0.2
0.3
Arsenic
4.9
mg/kg
2.6E-05
0.042
0.25
1.5E-06
0.0025
0.015
2.7E-09
0.000042
0.000042
1.0E-04
0.21
0.56
8.1E-06
0.016
0.0425
5.2E-05
0.13
-
4.4E-06
0.011
-
1.5E-06
0.026
-
2E-04
0.4
0.9
Barium
110
mg/kg
-
0.0024
0.014
-
-
-
-
0.000029
0.000029
-
0.013
0.034
-
0.000072
0.00019
-
0.0083
-
-
-
-
-
0.033
-
-
0.06
0.05
Cadmium
0.14
mg/kg
-
0.0060
0.036
-
0.00028
0.0017
3.3E-11
0.0000018
0.0000018
-
0.083
0.22
-
0.0032
0.0084
-
0.056
-
-
0.0062
-
9.3E-08
0.0056
-
9E-08
0.2
0.3
Chromium
6.0
mg/kg
4.8E-05
0.0086
0.052
-
-
-
1.1E-07
0.0000078
0.0000078
8.4E-05
0.024
0.06
1.8E-05
0.0053
0.0141
2.6E-05
0.015
-
-
-
-
4.5E-05
0.0009
-
2E-04
0.1
0.1
Cobalt
6.1
mg/kg
-
0.087
0.53
-
-
-
7.1E-09
0.00013
0.00013
-
0.37
0.98
-
0.20
0.53
-
0.22
-
-
-
-
6.0E-06
0.12
-
6E-06
1
2
Copper
12
mg/kg
-
0.0013
0.0078
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.051
0.14
-
0.0027
0.0072
-
0.033
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.09
0.2
Iron
11,000
mg/kg
-
0.068
0.41
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.19
0.49
-
0.14
0.38
-
0.11
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.5
1
Manganese
160
mg/kg
-
0.029
0.17
-
-
-
-
0.00042
0.00042
-
0.73
1.9
-
0.0022
0.0059
-
0.49
-
-
-
-
-
2.3
-
-
4
2
Molybdenum
0.32
mg/kg
-
0.00028
0.0017
-
-
-
-
0.000000021
0.000000021
-
0.0070
0.019
-
0.00029
0.00077
-
0.0047
-
-
-
-
-
0.00012
-
-
0.01
0.02
Selenium
3.4
mg/kg
-
0.0029
0.018
-
-
-
-
0.000000022
0.000000022
-
0.012
0.033
-
0.052
0.14
-
0.0075
-
-
-
-
-
0.000019
-
-
0.08
0.2
Thallium
0.14
mg/kg
-
0.060
0.36
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.14
0.39
-
0.25
0.69
-
0.088
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.5
1
Uranium
7.3
mg/kg
-
0.16
0.95
-
-
-
-
0.000024
0.000024
-
0.47
1.3
-
0.0051
0.014
-
0.30
-
-
-
-
-
0.016
-
-
1.0
2
Vanadium
14
mg/kg
-
0.012
0.07
-
-
-
-
0.000018
0.000018
-
0.034
0.092
-
0.0031
0.0084
-
0.021
-
-
-
-
-
0.011
-
-
0.08
0.2
Exposure Pathway
Risk/Hazard Total
4E-04
0.5
3
3E-03
0.003
0.02
2E-07
0.0008
0.0008
3E-03
2
6
5E-03
0.7
2
2E-03
2
-
4E-06
0.02
--
3E-04
3
-
1E-02
8
10
Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs)
Uranium-238
1.1
pCi/g
1.4E-06
-
-
7.0E-09
-
-
2.3E-09
-
-
6.8E-06
-
-
7.7E-06
-
-
3.1E-06
-
-
-
-
-
6.0E-06
-
-
3E-05
-
-
Uranium-234
1.2
pCi/g
1.7E-06
-
-
1.5E-08
-
-
2.9E-09
-
-
8.1E-06
-
-
9.3E-06
-
-
3.8E-06
-
-
-
-
-
7.7E-06
-
-
3E-05
-
-
Thorium-230
1.7
pCi/g
2.7E-06
-
-
7.3E-08
-
-
5.0E-09
-
-
3.6E-06
-
-
7.9E-09
-
-
2.0E-06
-
-
-
-
-
2.6E-06
-
-
1E-05
-
-
Radium-226 in SE
17
pCi/g
9.2E-04
-
-
7.3E-03
-
-
8.8E-08
-
-
6.9E-03
-
-
1.3E-02
-
-
3.8E-03
-
-
-
-
-
6.3E-04
-
-
3E-02
-
-
Aluminum
4,600
mg/kg
-
0.020
0.12
-
-
-
-
0.00012
0.00012
-
0.055
0.14
-
0.0032
0.0087
-
0.033
-
-
-
-
-
0.066
-
-
0.2
0.3
Arsenic
4.8
mg/kg
2.6E-05
0.042
0.24
1.5E-06
0.0024
0.015
2.7E-09
0.000042
0.000042
1.0E-04
0.21
0.54
7.9E-06
0.016
0.042
5.1E-05
0.12
-
4.3E-06
0.010
-
1.5E-06
0.025
-
2E-04
0.4
0.8
Barium
110
mg/kg
-
0.0024
0.014
-
-
-
-
0.000029
0.000029
-
0.013
0.03
-
0.000072
0.00019
-
0.0083
-
-
-
-
-
0.033
-
-
0.06
0.05
Cadmium
0.14
mg/kg
-
0.0060
0.036
-
0.00028
0.0017
3.3E-11
0.0000018
0.0000018
-
0.083
0.22
-
0.0032
0.0084
-
0.056
-
-
0.0062
-
9.3E-08
0.0056
-
9E-08
0.2
0.3
Chromium
6.0
mg/kg
4.8E-05
0.0086
0.052
-
-
-
1.1E-07
0.0000078
0.0000078
8.4E-05
0.024
0.06
1.8E-05
0.0053
0.0141
2.6E-05
0.015
-
-
-
-
4.5E-05
0.0009
-
2E-04
0.1
0.1
Cobalt
6.1
mg/kg
-
0.087
0.53
-
-
-
7.1E-09
0.00013
0.00013
-
0.37
0.98
-
0.20
0.53
-
0.22
-
-
-
-
6.0E-06
0.12
-
6E-06
1
2
Copper
12
mg/kg
-
0.0013
0.0078
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.051
0.14
-
0.0027
0.0072
-
0.033
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.09
0.2
Iron
11,000
mg/kg
-
0.068
0.41
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.19
0.49
-
0.14
0.38
-
0.11
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.5
1
Manganese
160
mg/kg
-
0.029
0.17
-
-
-
-
0.00042
0.00042
-
0.73
1.9
-
0.0022
0.0059
-
0.49
-
-
-
-
-
2.3
-
-
4
2
Molybdenum
0.32
mg/kg
-
0.00028
0.0017
-
-
-
-
0.000000021
0.000000021
-
0.0070
0.019
-
0.00029
0.00077
-
0.0047
-
-
-
-
-
0.00012
-
-
0.01
0.02
Selenium
3.1
mg/kg
-
0.0027
0.016
-
-
-
-
0.000000020
0.000000020
-
0.011
0.030
-
0.048
0.13
-
0.0068
-
-
-
-
-
0.000017
-
-
0.07
0.2
Thallium
0.14
mg/kg
-
0.060
0.36
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.14
0.39
-
0.25
0.69
-
0.088
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.5
1
Uranium
7.3
mg/kg
-
0.16
0.95
-
-
-
-
0.000024
0.000024
-
0.47
1.3
-
0.0051
0.014
-
0.30
-
-
-
-
-
0.016
-
-
1
2
Vanadium
14
mg/kg
-
0.012
0.073
-
-
-
-
0.000018
0.000018
-
0.034
0.092
-
0.0031
0.0084
-
0.021
-
-
-
-
-
0.011
-
-
0.08
0.2
Exposure Pathway
Risk/Hazard Total
1E-03
0.5
3
7E-03
0.003
0.02
2E-07
0.0008
0.0008
7E-03
2
6
1E-02
0.7
2
4E-03
2
-
4E-06
0.02
--
7E-04
3
-
3E-02
8
10
Page 1 of 6
-------
Table C-6. Human Health Risk and Hazard Summary by Exposure Pathway
Church Rock Mine No. 1 East - Kee'da'whn teeh (Full-Time Resident)
COPC
EPC
Units
Incidental Soil Ingestion
External Exposure /
Dermal Contact
Inhalation of Particulates
Plant Consumption
Animal Consumption
ODL Plant Ingestion
ODL Plant Dermal
ODL Plant Inhalation
Total Risk or Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
Uranium-238
1.3
pCi/g
1.7E-06
-
-
8.2E-09
-
-
2.7E-09
-
-
8.0E-06
-
-
9.1E-06
-
-
3.7E-06
-
-
-
-
-
7.1E-06
-
-
3E-05
-
-
Uranium-234
1.4
pCi/g
2.0E-06
-
-
1.8E-08
-
-
3.4E-09
-
-
9.5E-06
-
-
1.1E-05
-
-
4.4E-06
-
-
-
-
-
9.0E-06
-
-
4E-05
-
-
Thorium-230
3.6
pCi/g
5.7E-06
-
-
1.6E-07
-
-
1.1E-08
-
-
7.7E-06
-
-
1.7E-08
-
-
4.2E-06
-
-
-
-
-
5.5E-06
-
-
2E-05
-
-
Radium-226 in SE
9.3
pCi/g
5.0E-04
-
-
4.0E-03
-
-
4.8E-08
-
-
3.8E-03
-
-
7.2E-03
-
-
2.1E-03
-
-
-
-
-
3.5E-04
-
-
2E-02
-
-
Aluminum
6,300
mg/kg
-
0.027
0.16
-
-
-
-
0.00016
0.00016
-
0.076
0.20
-
0.0044
0.0120
-
0.045
-
-
-
-
-
0.091
-
-
0.2
0.4
Arsenic
6.6
mg/kg
3.6E-05
0.057
0.33
2.1E-06
0.0033
0.020
3.7E-09
0.000057
0.000057
1.4E-04
0.29
0.75
1.1E-05
0.022
0.0572
7.0E-05
0.17
-
5.9E-06
0.014
-
2.0E-06
0.035
-
3E-04
0.6
1.0
Barium
160
mg/kg
-
0.0034
0.021
-
-
-
-
0.000042
0.000042
-
0.018
0.049
-
0.000104
0.00028
-
0.0120
-
-
-
-
-
0.048
-
-
0.08
0.07
Cadmium
0.13
mg/kg
-
0.0056
0.034
-
0.00026
0.0016
3.0E-11
0.0000017
0.0000017
-
0.077
0.21
-
0.0030
0.0078
-
0.052
-
-
0.0057
-
8.7E-08
0.0052
-
9E-08
0.1
0.3
Chromium
10
mg/kg
8.0E-05
0.0143
0.087
-
-
-
1.8E-07
0.000013
0.000013
1.4E-04
0.040
0.11
3.1E-05
0.0088
0.0235
4.4E-05
0.024
-
-
-
-
7.5E-05
0.0075
-
4E-04
0.1
0.2
Cobalt
6.9
mg/kg
-
0.099
0.60
-
-
-
8.1E-09
0.00015
0.00015
-
0.41
1.10
-
0.22
0.60
-
0.25
-
-
-
-
6.8E-06
0.14
-
7E-06
1
2
Copper
13
mg/kg
-
0.0014
0.0085
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.055
0.15
-
0.0029
0.0078
-
0.036
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.10
0.2
Iron
16,000
mg/kg
-
0.098
0.59
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.27
0.71
-
0.21
0.55
-
0.16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.7
2
Manganese
200
mg/kg
-
0.036
0.22
-
-
-
-
0.00052
0.00052
-
0.92
2.4
-
0.0028
0.0074
-
0.61
-
-
-
-
-
2.9
-
-
4
3
Molybdenum
0.31
mg/kg
-
0.00027
0.0016
-
-
-
-
0.000000020
0.000000020
-
0.0068
0.018
-
0.00028
0.00074
-
0.0045
-
-
-
-
-
0.00011
-
-
0.01
0.02
Selenium
3.0
mg/kg
-
0.0026
0.016
-
-
-
-
0.000000020
0.000000020
-
0.011
0.029
-
0.046
0.13
-
0.0066
-
-
-
-
-
0.000017
-
-
0.07
0.2
Thallium
0.16
mg/kg
-
0.069
0.42
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.16
0.45
-
0.29
0.78
-
0.101
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.6
2
Uranium
3.6
mg/kg
-
0.08
0.47
-
-
-
-
0.000012
0.000012
-
0.23
0.6
-
0.0025
0.007
-
0.15
-
-
-
-
-
0.008
-
-
0.5
1
Vanadium
16
mg/kg
-
0.014
0.08
-
-
-
-
0.000021
0.000021
-
0.038
0.106
-
0.0035
0.0096
-
0.024
-
-
-
-
-
0.012
-
-
0.09
0.2
Exposure Pathway
Risk/Hazard Total
6E-04
0.5
3.0
4E-03
0.004
0.02
3E-07
0.001
0.001
4E-03
3
7
7E-03
0.8
2
2E-03
2
-
6E-06
0.02
--
5E-04
3
-
2E-02
8
10
Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs)
Uranium-238
1.3
pCi/g
1.7E-06
-
-
8.2E-09
-
-
2.7E-09
-
-
8.0E-06
-
-
9.1E-06
-
-
3.7E-06
-
-
-
-
-
7.1E-06
-
-
3E-05
-
-
Uranium-234
1.4
pCi/g
2.0E-06
-
-
1.8E-08
-
-
3.4E-09
-
-
9.5E-06
-
-
1.1E-05
-
-
4.4E-06
-
-
-
-
-
9.0E-06
-
-
4E-05
-
-
Thorium-230
3.6
pCi/g
5.7E-06
-
-
1.6E-07
-
-
1.1E-08
-
-
7.7E-06
-
-
1.7E-08
-
-
4.2E-06
-
-
-
-
-
5.5E-06
-
-
2E-05
-
-
Radium-226 in SE
43
pCi/g
2.3E-03
-
-
1.8E-02
-
-
2.2E-07
-
-
1.7E-02
-
-
3.3E-02
-
-
9.5E-03
-
-
-
-
-
1.6E-03
-
-
8E-02
-
-
Aluminum
6,300
mg/kg
-
0.027
0.16
-
-
-
-
0.00016
0.00016
-
0.076
0.20
-
0.0044
0.012
-
0.045
-
-
-
-
-
0.091
-
-
0.2
0.4
Arsenic
6.3
mg/kg
3.4E-05
0.055
0.32
2.0E-06
0.0032
0.019
3.5E-09
0.000055
0.000055
1.3E-04
0.27
0.71
1.0E-05
0.021
0.055
6.7E-05
0.16
-
5.7E-06
0.014
-
2.0E-06
0.033
-
3E-04
0.6
1
Barium
160
mg/kg
-
0.0034
0.021
-
-
-
-
0.000042
0.000042
-
0.018
0.05
-
0.00010
0.00028
-
0.012
-
-
-
-
-
0.048
-
-
0.08
0.07
Cadmium
0.13
mg/kg
-
0.0056
0.034
-
0.00026
0.0016
3.0E-11
0.0000017
0.0000017
-
0.077
0.21
-
0.0030
0.0078
-
0.052
-
-
0.0057
-
8.7E-08
0.0052
-
9E-08
0.1
0.3
Chromium
10
mg/kg
8.0E-05
0.0143
0.087
-
-
-
1.8E-07
0.000013
0.000013
1.4E-04
0.040
0.11
3.1E-05
0.0088
0.0235
4.4E-05
0.024
-
-
-
-
7.5E-05
0.0075
-
4E-04
0.1
0.2
Cobalt
6.9
mg/kg
-
0.099
0.60
-
-
-
8.1E-09
0.00015
0.00015
-
0.41
1.1
-
0.22
0.60
-
0.25
-
-
-
-
6.8E-06
0.14
-
7E-06
1
2
Copper
13
mg/kg
-
0.0014
0.0085
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.055
0.15
-
0.0029
0.0078
-
0.036
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.1
0.2
Iron
16,000
mg/kg
-
0.098
0.59
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.27
0.71
-
0.21
0.55
-
0.16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.7
2
Manganese
200
mg/kg
-
0.036
0.22
-
-
-
-
0.00052
0.00052
-
0.92
2.4
-
0.0028
0.0074
-
0.61
-
-
-
-
-
2.9
-
-
4
3
Molybdenum
0.51
mg/kg
-
0.00044
0.0027
-
-
-
-
0.000000033
0.000000033
-
0.011
0.030
-
0.00046
0.0012
-
0.0074
-
-
-
-
-
0.00019
-
-
0.02
0.03
Selenium
5.4
mg/kg
-
0.0046
0.028
-
-
-
-
0.000000035
0.000000035
-
0.019
0.052
-
0.083
0.23
-
0.012
-
-
-
-
-
0.000030
-
-
0.1
0.3
Thallium
0.16
mg/kg
-
0.069
0.42
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.16
0.45
-
0.29
0.78
-
0.10
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.6
2
Uranium
42
mg/kg
-
0.90
5.5
-
-
-
-
0.00014
0.00014
-
2.7
7.6
-
0.029
0.080
-
1.7
-
-
-
-
-
0.089
-
-
5
10
Vanadium
18
mg/kg
-
0.015
0.094
-
-
-
-
0.000023
0.000023
-
0.043
0.12
-
0.0040
0.011
-
0.027
-
-
-
-
-
0.014
-
-
0.10
0.2
Exposure Pathway
Risk/Hazard Total
2E-03
1
8
2E-02
0.003
0.02
4E-07
0.001
0.001
2E-02
5
14
3E-02
0.9
2
1E-02
3
-
6E-06
0.02
--
2E-03
3
-
8E-02
10
20
Page 2 of 6
-------
Table C-6. Human Health Risk and Hazard Summary by Exposure Pathway
Kerr-McGee Ponds on the Navajo Nation - Kee'da'whn teeh (Full-Time Resident)
COPC
EPC
Units
Incidental Soil Ingestion
External Exposure /
Dermal Contact
Inhalation of Particulates
Plant Consumption
Animal Consumption
ODL Plant Ingestion
ODL Plant Dermal
ODL Plant Inhalation
Total Risk or Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
Uranium-238
1.1
pCi/g
1.4E-06
-
-
7.0E-09
-
-
2.3E-09
-
-
6.8E-06
-
-
7.7E-06
-
-
3.1E-06
-
-
-
-
-
6.0E-06
-
-
3E-05
-
-
Uranium-234
1.0
pCi/g
1.4E-06
-
-
1.3E-08
-
-
2.3E-09
-
-
6.6E-06
-
-
7.5E-06
-
-
3.1E-06
-
-
-
-
-
6.2E-06
-
-
2E-05
-
-
Thorium-230
2.0
pCi/g
3.2E-06
-
-
8.6E-08
-
-
5.9E-09
-
-
4.3E-06
-
-
9.3E-09
-
-
2.3E-06
-
-
-
-
-
3.1E-06
-
-
1E-05
-
-
Radium-226 in SE
9.3
pCi/g
5.0E-04
-
-
4.0E-03
-
-
4.8E-08
-
-
3.8E-03
-
-
7.2E-03
-
-
2.1E-03
-
-
-
-
-
3.5E-04
-
-
2E-02
-
-
Aluminum
6,900
mg/kg
-
0.030
0.18
-
-
-
-
0.00018
0.00018
-
0.083
0.21
-
0.0048
0.0131
-
0.049
-
-
-
-
-
0.099
-
-
0.3
0.4
Arsenic
5.9
mg/kg
3.2E-05
0.051
0.30
1.9E-06
0.0030
0.018
3.3E-09
0.000051
0.000051
1.2E-04
0.26
0.67
9.7E-06
0.019
0.0511
6.3E-05
0.15
-
5.3E-06
0.013
-
1.8E-06
0.031
-
2E-04
0.5
1
Barium
82
mg/kg
-
0.0018
0.011
-
-
-
-
0.000021
0.000021
-
0.009
0.025
-
0.000053
0.00014
-
0.0062
-
-
-
-
-
0.025
-
-
0.04
0.04
Cadmium
0.16
mg/kg
-
0.0069
0.042
-
0.00032
0.0019
3.7E-11
0.0000021
0.0000021
-
0.094
0.26
-
0.0037
0.0096
-
0.064
-
-
0.0070
-
1.1E-07
0.0064
-
1E-07
0.2
0.3
Chromium
8.2
mg/kg
6.6E-05
0.0118
0.071
-
-
-
1.5E-07
0.000011
0.000011
1.1E-04
0.033
0.09
2.5E-05
0.0072
0.0192
3.6E-05
0.020
-
-
-
-
6.1E-05
0.0061
-
3E-04
0.1
0.2
Cobalt
5.2
mg/kg
-
0.075
0.45
-
-
-
6.1E-09
0.00011
0.00011
-
0.31
0.83
-
0.17
0.45
-
0.19
-
-
-
-
5.1E-06
0.10
-
5E-06
0.8
2
Copper
11
mg/kg
-
0.0012
0.0072
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.047
0.12
-
0.0025
0.0066
-
0.030
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.08
0.1
Iron
15,000
mg/kg
-
0.092
0.56
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.26
0.66
-
0.20
0.51
-
0.15
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.7
2
Manganese
230
mg/kg
-
0.041
0.25
-
-
-
-
0.00060
0.00060
-
1.05
2.8
-
0.0032
0.0085
-
0.70
-
-
-
-
-
3.4
-
-
5
3
Molybdenum
0.55
mg/kg
-
0.00047
0.0029
-
-
-
-
0.000000036
0.000000036
-
0.0121
0.032
-
0.00050
0.00132
-
0.0080
-
-
-
-
-
0.00020
-
-
0.02
0.04
Selenium
2.9
mg/kg
-
0.0025
0.015
-
-
-
-
0.000000019
0.000000019
-
0.010
0.028
-
0.045
0.12
-
0.0064
-
-
-
-
-
0.000016
-
-
0.06
0.2
Thallium
0.15
mg/kg
-
0.065
0.39
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.15
0.42
-
0.27
0.74
-
0.095
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.6
2
Uranium
6.2
mg/kg
-
0.13
0.81
-
-
-
-
0.000020
0.000020
-
0.40
1.1
-
0.0043
0.012
-
0.26
-
-
-
-
-
0.013
-
-
0.8
2
Vanadium
17
mg/kg
-
0.015
0.09
-
-
-
-
0.000022
0.000022
-
0.041
0.112
-
0.0037
0.0102
-
0.026
-
-
-
-
-
0.013
-
-
0.1
0.2
Exposure Pathway
Risk/Hazard Total
6E-04
0.5
3
4E-03
0.003
0.02
2E-07
0.001
0.001
4E-03
3
7
7E-03
0.7
n
2E-03
o
-
5E-06
0.02
-
4E-04
4
-
2E-02
9
10
Subsurface Soil (0-66 inches bgs)
Uranium-238
1.1
pCi/g
1.4E-06
-
-
7.0E-09
-
-
2.3E-09
-
-
6.8E-06
-
-
7.7E-06
-
-
3.1E-06
-
-
-
-
-
6.0E-06
-
-
3E-05
-
-
Uranium-234
1.0
pCi/g
1.4E-06
-
-
1.3E-08
-
-
2.3E-09
-
-
6.6E-06
-
-
7.5E-06
-
-
3.1E-06
-
-
-
-
-
6.2E-06
-
-
2E-05
-
-
Thorium-230
2.0
pCi/g
3.2E-06
-
-
8.6E-08
-
-
5.9E-09
-
-
4.3E-06
-
-
9.3E-09
-
-
2.3E-06
-
-
-
-
-
3.1E-06
-
-
1E-05
-
-
Radium-226 in SE
9.3
pCi/g
5.0E-04
-
-
4.0E-03
-
-
4.8E-08
-
-
3.8E-03
-
-
7.2E-03
-
-
2.1E-03
-
-
-
-
-
3.5E-04
-
-
2E-02
-
-
Aluminum
6,900
mg/kg
-
0.030
0.18
-
-
-
-
0.00018
0.00018
-
0.083
0.21
-
0.0048
0.0131
-
0.049
-
-
-
-
-
0.099
-
-
0.3
0.4
Arsenic
5.9
mg/kg
3.2E-05
0.051
0.30
1.9E-06
0.0030
0.018
3.3E-09
0.000051
0.000051
1.2E-04
0.26
0.67
9.7E-06
0.019
0.051
6.3E-05
0.15
-
5.3E-06
0.013
-
1.8E-06
0.031
-
2E-04
0.5
1
Barium
82
mg/kg
-
0.0018
0.011
-
-
-
-
0.000021
0.000021
-
0.009
0.03
-
0.000053
0.00014
-
0.0062
-
-
-
-
-
0.025
-
-
0.04
0.04
Cadmium
0.16
mg/kg
-
0.0069
0.042
-
0.00032
0.0019
3.7E-11
0.0000021
0.0000021
-
0.094
0.26
-
0.0037
0.0096
-
0.064
-
-
0.0070
-
1.1E-07
0.0064
-
1E-07
0.2
0.3
Chromium
8.2
mg/kg
6.6E-05
0.0118
0.071
-
-
-
1.5E-07
0.000011
0.000011
1.1E-04
0.033
0.09
2.5E-05
0.0072
0.0192
3.6E-05
0.020
-
-
-
-
6.1E-05
0.0061
-
3E-04
0.1
0.2
Cobalt
5.2
mg/kg
-
0.075
0.45
-
-
-
6.1E-09
0.00011
0.00011
-
0.31
0.83
-
0.17
0.45
-
0.19
-
-
-
-
5.1E-06
0.10
-
5E-06
0.8
2
Copper
11
mg/kg
-
0.0012
0.0072
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.047
0.12
-
0.0025
0.0066
-
0.030
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.08
0.1
Iron
15,000
mg/kg
-
0.092
0.56
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.26
0.66
-
0.20
0.51
-
0.15
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.7
2
Manganese
230
mg/kg
-
0.041
0.25
-
-
-
-
0.00060
0.00060
-
1.05
2.8
-
0.0032
0.0085
-
0.70
-
-
-
-
-
3.4
-
-
5
3
Molybdenum
0.55
mg/kg
-
0.00047
0.0029
-
-
-
-
0.000000036
0.000000036
-
0.0121
0.032
-
0.00050
0.00132
-
0.0080
-
-
-
-
-
0.00020
-
-
0.02
0.04
Selenium
2.9
mg/kg
-
0.0025
0.015
-
-
-
-
0.000000019
0.000000019
-
0.010
0.028
-
0.045
0.12
-
0.0064
-
-
-
-
-
0.000016
-
-
0.06
0.2
Thallium
0.15
mg/kg
-
0.065
0.39
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.15
0.42
-
0.27
0.74
-
0.095
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.6
2
Uranium
6.2
mg/kg
-
0.13
0.81
-
-
-
-
0.000020
0.000020
-
0.40
1.1
-
0.0043
0.012
-
0.26
-
-
-
-
-
0.013
-
-
0.8
2
Vanadium
17
mg/kg
-
0.015
0.088
-
-
-
-
0.000022
0.000022
-
0.041
0.112
-
0.0037
0.0102
-
0.026
-
-
-
-
-
0.013
-
-
0.1
0.2
Exposure Pathway
Risk/Hazard Total
6E-04
0.5
3
4E-03
0.003
0.02
2E-07
0.001
0.001
4E-03
3
7
7E-03
0.7
n
2E-03
o
0
5E-06
0.020
0
4E-04
4
0
2E-02
9
10
Page 3 of 6
-------
Table C-6. Human Health Risk and Hazard Summary by Exposure Pathway
Kerr-McGee Ponds on United Nuclear Corporation Property - UNC Outdoor Worker
COPC
EPC
Units
Incidental Soil Ingestion
External Exposure /
Dermal Contact
Inhalation of Particulates
Plant Consumption
Animal Consumption
ODL Plant Ingestion
ODL Plant Dermal
ODL Plant Inhalation
Total Risk or Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
Uranium-238
2.4
pCi/g
8.0E-08
--
--
6.1E-10
--
--
1.4E-10
~
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
~
~
--
--
--
8E-08
--
--
Uranium-234
2.4
pCi/g
8.9E-08
--
--
1.2E-09
~
~
1.7E-10
--
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
--
~
~
--
--
--
~
~
~
9E-08
~
--
Thorium-230
3.4
pCi/g
1.4E-07
--
--
5.9E-09
~
~
2.9E-10
~
~
~
~
~
--
--
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
1E-07
~
--
Radium-226 in SE
13.0
pCi/g
1.8E-05
~
»
2.2E-04
~
~
1.9E-09
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
»
»
--
2E-04
~
»
Aluminum
6,600
mg/kg
--
0.002
~
--
--
--
~
0.000018
~
--
--
--
~
~
~
--
--
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
--
0.002
~
Arsenic
6.0
mg/kg
6.6E-07
0.004
~
1.4E-07
0.0009
~
1.3E-10
0.0000055
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
8E-07
0.005
~
Barium
83
mg/kg
--
0.0001
~
--
~
~
--
0.0000023
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
--
--
--
~
~
~
--
0.0001
~
Cadmium
0.11
mg/kg
--
0.0004
~
~
0.00006
~
9.8E-13
0.00000015
~
~
~
~
--
--
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
1E-12
0.0004
~
Chromium
8.5
mg/kg
--
0.0097
~
~
~
~
3.8E-10
0.000020
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
--
4E-10
0.0100
~
Cobalt
5.2
mg/kg
»
0.006
»
»
»
--
2.3E-10
0.000012
~
--
--
--
~
~
~
--
--
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
2E-10
0.006
--
Copper
11
mg/kg
--
0.0001
~
~
~
~
~
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
--
0.00009
~
Iron
15,000
mg/kg
»
0.007
~
~
~
~
»
»
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
--
»
»
~
~
-
~
0.007
~
Manganese
220
mg/kg
--
0.003
~
~
~
~
~
0.000061
~
~
~
~
--
--
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
0.003
~
Molybdenum
0.57
mg/kg
»
0.00004
~
~
~
~
~
0.0000000039
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
»
»
--
~
0.00004
~
Selenium
4.0
mg/kg
--
0.0003
~
~
~
--
~
0.0000000028
~
--
--
--
~
~
~
--
--
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
--
0.0003
--
Thallium
0.14
mg/kg
»
0.005
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
0.005
~
Uranium
7.7
mg/kg
--
0.01
~
~
~
~
~
0.0000027
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
0.01
~
Vanadium
19
mg/kg
--
0.001
~
~
~
~
~
0.0000026
~
~
~
~
--
--
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
0.001
~
Exposure Pathway
Risk/Hazard Total
2E-05
0.05
--
2E-04
0.0009
-
3E-09
0.0001
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
--
--
--
-
2E-04
0.05
-
Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs)
Uranium-238
52
pCi/g
1.7E-06
--
--
1.3E-08
--
--
3.1E-09
~
~
--
--
--
~
~
~
--
--
--
~
~
~
~
~
--
2E-06
--
--
Uranium-234
49
pCi/g
1.8E-06
--
~
2.5E-08
~
~
3.4E-09
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
2E-06
--
~
Thorium-230
3.4
pCi/g
1.4E-07
--
~
5.9E-09
~
~
2.9E-10
--
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
--
--
--
~
~
~
1E-07
--
~
Radium-226 in SE
12
pCi/g
1.7E-05
--
~
2.1E-04
~
~
1.8E-09
~
~
~
~
~
--
--
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
2E-04
--
~
Aluminum
6,600
mg/kg
--
0.002
~
--
~
~
--
0.000018
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
--
--
--
--
0.002
~
Arsenic
5.8
mg/kg
6.4E-07
0.004
»
1.3E-07
0.0008
--
1.2E-10
0.0000053
~
--
--
--
~
~
~
--
--
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
8E-07
0.005
--
Barium
75
mg/kg
--
0.0001
~
--
--
~
~
0.0000021
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
--
0.0001
~
Cadmium
0.093
mg/kg
»
0.0003
~
~
0.00005
~
8.3E-13
0.00000013
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
--
»
»
~
~
~
8E-13
0.0004
~
Chromium
8.1
mg/kg
--
0.0092
~
~
~
~
3.6E-10
0.000019
~
~
~
~
--
--
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
4E-10
0.0090
~
Cobalt
5.2
mg/kg
--
0.006
~
~
~
~
2.3E-10
0.000012
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
--
--
--
2E-10
0.006
~
Copper
10
mg/kg
--
0.0001
~
--
--
--
--
--
~
--
--
--
~
~
~
--
--
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
--
0.00008
--
Iron
15,000
mg/kg
--
0.007
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
0.007
~
Manganese
220
mg/kg
--
0.003
~
~
~
~
--
0.000061
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
0.003
~
Molybdenum
0.63
mg/kg
»
0.00004
~
~
~
~
~
0.0000000044
~
~
~
~
--
--
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
0.00004
~
Selenium
3.7
mg/kg
--
0.0003
~
~
~
~
~
0.0000000026
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
--
--
--
~
0.0003
~
Thallium
0.14
mg/kg
--
0.005
--
--
--
--
~
--
~
--
--
--
~
~
~
--
--
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
--
0.005
--
Uranium
25
mg/kg
--
0.04
~
~
~
~
~
0.0000086
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
0.04
~
Vanadium
18
mg/kg
--
0.001
~
~
~
~
--
0.0000025
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
--
--
--
~
~
~
~
0.001
~
Exposure Pathway
Risk/Hazard Total
2E-05
0.08
--
2E-04
0.0009
-
9E-09
0.0001
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
--
--
--
-
2E-04
0.08
-
Page 4 of 6
-------
Table C-6. Human Health Risk and Hazard Summary by Exposure Pathway
Arroyos on the Navajo Nation - Kqq ei doo nahaazah dah (Difficult Access Open Space)
COPC
EPC
Units
Incidental Soil Ingestion
External Exposure /
Dermal Contact
Inhalation of Particulates
Plant Consumption
Animal Consumption
ODL Plant Ingestion
ODL Plant Dermal
ODL Plant Inhalation
Total Risk or Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
Uranium-238
-
pCi/g
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Uranium-234
-
pCi/g
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Thorium-230
-
pCi/g
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Radium-226 in SE
1.3
pCi/g
2.5E-07
-
-
2.5E-06
-
-
6.7E-09
-
-
3.5E-05
-
-
5.3E-07
-
-
2.8E-04
-
-
-
-
-
4.8E-05
-
-
4E-04
-
-
Aluminum
4,700
mg/kg
-
0.000071
0.00044
-
-
-
-
0.00012
0.00012
-
0.0037
0.010
-
0.00034
0.00089
-
0.033
-
-
-
-
-
0.068
-
-
0.1
0.01
Arsenic
11
mg/kg
2.1E-07
0.00034
0.0021
3.0E-07
0.00048
0.0029
6.1E-09
0.00010
0.00010
1.6E-05
0.030
0.081
2.0E-06
0.0037
0.010
1.2E-04
0.28
-
0.000010
0.023
-
3.4E-06
0.057
-
1E-04
0.4
0.1
Barium
74
mg/kg
-
0.0000056
0.000034
-
-
-
-
0.000019
0.000019
-
0.00048
0.0013
-
0.0000048
0.000013
-
0.0052
-
-
-
-
-
0.021
-
-
0.03
0.001
Cadmium
0.064
mg/kg
-
0.000010
0.000060
-
0.000011
0.000064
1.5E-11
0.00000083
0.00000083
-
0.0019
0.0050
-
0.0000070
0.000018
-
0.024
-
-
0.0027
-
4.0E-08
0.0024
-
4E-08
0.03
0.005
Chromium
6.7
mg/kg
1.9E-07
0.000034
0.000208
-
-
-
1.2E-07
0.0000087
0.0000087
6.3E-06
0.0018
0.0048
2.1E-06
0.0006090
0.001624
2.9E-05
0.016
-
-
-
-
4.9E-05
0.0050
-
9E-05
0.02
0.007
Cobalt
4.0
mg/kg
-
0.00020
0.0012
-
-
-
4.7E-09
0.000087
0.000087
-
0.015
0.039
-
0.013
0.036
-
0.15
-
-
-
-
3.6E-06
0.073
-
4E-06
0.2
0.08
Copper
5.1
mg/kg
-
0.0000019
0.000012
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.0010
0.0027
-
0.00012
0.00032
-
0.014
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.02
0.003
Iron
12,000
mg/kg
-
0.00026
0.0016
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.014
0.036
-
0.016
0.043
-
0.12
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.2
0.08
Manganese
200
mg/kg
-
0.00013
0.00078
-
-
-
-
0.00052
0.00052
-
0.043
0.12
-
0.00028
0.00075
-
0.57
-
-
-
-
-
2.8
-
-
3
0.1
Molybdenum
0.81
mg/kg
-
0.0000024
0.000015
-
-
-
-
0.000000053
0.000000053
-
0.00083
0.0023
-
0.000075
0.00019
-
0.0110
-
-
-
-
-
0.00028
-
-
0.01
0.002
Selenium
1.5
mg/kg
-
0.0000045
0.000028
-
-
-
-
0.000000010
0.000000010
-
0.00033
0.00084
-
0.000045
0.00012
-
0.0033
-
-
-
-
-
0.0000083
-
-
0.004
0.001
Thallium
0.092
mg/kg
-
0.00014
0.00086
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.0067
0.018
-
0.017
0.047
-
0.057
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.08
0.07
Uranium
2.9
mg/kg
-
0.000218
0.00135
-
-
-
-
0.0000094
0.0000094
-
0.0126
0.0334
-
0.000203
0.00054
-
0.12
-
-
-
-
-
0.0060
-
-
0.10
0.040
Vanadium
25
mg/kg
-
0.000075
0.00047
-
-
-
-
0.000033
0.000033
-
0.0041
0.011
-
0.00060
0.0016
-
0.037
-
-
-
-
-
0.019
-
-
0.06
0.01
Exposure Pathway
Risk/Hazard Total
7E-07
0.001
0.009
3E-06
0.0005
0.003
1E-07
0.000895
0.000895
6E-05
0.1
0.4
5E-06
0.05
0.1
4E-04
1
-
1E-05
0.03
-
1E-04
3
-
6E-04
5
0.5
Subsurface Soil (0-36 inches bgs)
Uranium-238
-
pCi/g
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Uranium-234
-
pCi/g
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Thorium-230
-
pCi/g
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Radium-226 in SE
1.5
pCi/g
2.9E-07
-
-
2.9E-06
-
-
3.0E-11
-
-
4.0E-05
-
-
6.1E-07
-
-
3.2E-04
-
-
-
-
-
5.5E-05
-
-
4E-04
-
-
Aluminum
4,700
mg/kg
-
0.000071
0.00044
-
-
-
-
0.00000049
0.00000049
-
0.0037
0.010
-
0.00034
0.00089
-
0.033
-
-
-
-
-
0.068
-
-
0.1
0.01
Arsenic
11
mg/kg
2.1E-07
0.00034
0.0021
3.0E-07
0.00048
0.0029
2.5E-11
0.00000038
0.00000038
1.6E-05
0.030
0.081
2.0E-06
0.0037
0.010
1.2E-04
0.28
-
0.000010
0.023
-
3.4E-06
0.057
-
1E-04
0.4
0.1
Barium
75
mg/kg
-
0.0000056
0.000035
-
-
-
-
0.000000078
0.000000078
-
0.00049
0.0013
-
0.0000049
0.000013
-
0.0053
-
-
-
-
-
0.021
-
-
0.03
0.001
Cadmium
0.073
mg/kg
-
0.000011
0.000068
-
0.000012
0.000073
6.8E-14
0.0000000038
0.0000000038
-
0.0021
0.0057
-
0.0000080
0.000020
-
0.027
-
-
0.0031
-
4.6E-08
0.0028
-
5E-08
0.03
0.006
Chromium
6.7
mg/kg
1.9E-07
0.000034
0.000208
-
-
-
4.7E-10
0.000000035
0.000000035
6.3E-06
0.0018
0.0048
2.1E-06
0.0006090
0.001624
2.9E-05
0.016
-
-
-
-
4.9E-05
0.0050
-
9E-05
0.02
0.007
Cobalt
4.5
mg/kg
-
0.00023
0.0014
-
-
-
2.1E-11
0.00000039
0.00000039
-
0.017
0.044
-
0.015
0.041
-
0.17
-
-
-
-
4.1E-06
0.083
-
4E-06
0.3
0.09
Copper
5.1
mg/kg
-
0.0000019
0.000012
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.0010
0.0027
-
0.00012
0.00032
-
0.014
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.02
0.003
Iron
15,000
mg/kg
-
0.00032
0.0020
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.017
0.045
-
0.020
0.054
-
0.15
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.2
0.1
Manganese
400
mg/kg
-
0.00025
0.0016
-
-
-
-
0.0000042
0.0000042
-
0.085
0.23
-
0.00057
0.0015
-
1.1
-
-
-
-
-
5.6
-
-
7
0.2
Molybdenum
0.81
mg/kg
-
0.0000024
0.000015
-
-
-
-
0.00000000021
0.00000000021
-
0.00083
0.0023
-
0.000075
0.00019
-
0.011
-
-
-
-
-
0.00028
-
-
0.01
0.002
Selenium
1.5
mg/kg
-
0.0000045
0.000028
-
-
-
-
0.000000000039
0.000000000039
-
0.00033
0.00084
-
0.000045
0.00012
-
0.0033
-
-
-
-
-
0.0000083
-
-
0.004
0.001
Thallium
0.092
mg/kg
-
0.00014
0.00086
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.0067
0.018
-
0.017
0.047
-
0.057
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.08
0.07
Uranium
2.9
mg/kg
-
0.000218
0.00135
-
-
-
-
0.0000000377
0.0000000377
-
0.0126
0.0334
-
0.000203
0.00054
-
0.117
-
-
-
-
-
0.0060
-
-
0.10
0.040
Vanadium
25
mg/kg
-
0.000075
0.00047
-
-
-
-
0.00000013
0.00000013
-
0.0041
0.011
-
0.00060
0.0016
-
0.037
-
-
-
-
-
0.019
-
-
0.06
0.01
Exposure Pathway
Risk/Hazard Total
7E-07
0.002
0.010
3E-06
0.0005
0.003
5E-10
0.000006
0.000006
6E-05
0.2
0.5
5E-06
0.06
CM
o
5E-04
o
-
1E-05
0.03
-
1E-04
6
-
6E-04
8
0.7
Page 5 of 6
-------
Table C-6. Human Health Risk and Hazard Summary by Exposure Pathway
Arroyos on United Nuclear Corporation Property - UNC Outdoor Worker
COPC
EPC
Units
Incidental Soil Ingestion
External Exposure /
Dermal Contact
Inhalation of Particulates
Plant Consumption
Animal Consumption
ODL Plant Ingestion
ODL Plant Dermal
ODL Plant Inhalation
Total Risk or Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Cancer
Risk
Adult
Hazard
Child
Hazard
Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
Uranium-238
--
pCi/g
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
~
~
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Uranium-234
--
pCi/g
--
~
--
--
~
~
--
~
--
~
~
~
--
--
--
~
~
~
--
~
~
~
~
~
--
~
--
Thorium-230
--
pCi/g
--
~
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
--
--
--
~
~
--
Radium-226 in SE
1.3E+00
pCi/g
1.6E-06
»
»
1.9E-05
»
--
1.6E-10
~
~
--
--
--
~
~
~
»
--
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
2E-05
--
-
Aluminum
4.7E+03
mg/kg
--
0.0015
~
--
~
~
~
0.000012
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
--
0.002
--
Arsenic
1.1E+01
mg/kg
5.1E-07
0.0032
~
1.1E-07
0.00067
~
9.8E-11
0.0000042
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
--
»
»
~
~
~
6E-07
0.004
»
Barium
7.4E+01
mg/kg
--
0.000082
~
~
~
~
--
0.0000013
~
~
~
~
--
--
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
0.00008
~
Cadmium
6.4E-02
mg/kg
--
0.00018
~
~
0.000031
~
4.8E-13
0.000000075
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
--
--
--
5E-13
0.0002
~
Chromium
6.7E+00
mg/kg
--
0.00571
--
--
~
--
2.2E-10
0.000012
~
--
--
--
~
~
~
~
--
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
2E-10
0.0060
~
Cobalt
4.0E+00
mg/kg
»
0.0050
-
~
~
~
2.0E-10
0.000010
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
2E-10
0.005
~
Copper
5.1E+00
mg/kg
--
0.000040
~
~
~
~
--
--
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
--
~
~
~
~
~
--
0.00004
~
Iron
1.2E+04
mg/kg
--
0.0064
~
~
~
~
~
»
~
~
~
~
--
--
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
0.006
~
Manganese
2.0E+02
mg/kg
--
0.0034
~
~
~
~
~
0.000066
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
--
--
--
~
0.003
~
Molybdenum
8.1E-01
mg/kg
»
0.000019
»
»
»
--
~
0.0000000019
~
--
--
--
~
~
~
»
--
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
--
0.00002
»
Selenium
1.5E+00
mg/kg
--
0.000075
~
~
~
~
~
0.00000000076
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
0.00008
~
Thallium
9.2E-02
mg/kg
»
0.0020
~
~
~
~
»
~
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
--
»
»
~
~
~
~
0.002
~
Uranium
2.9E+00
mg/kg
--
0.00016
~
~
~
~
~
0.000000031
~
~
~
~
--
--
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
0.0002
~
Vanadium
2.5E+01
mg/kg
--
0.000036
~
~
~
~
~
0.000000073
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
--
--
--
~
0.0000
~
Exposure Pathway
Risk/Hazard Total
2E-06
0.03
--
2E-05
0.0007
-
7E-10
0.00011
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
--
--
--
-
2E-05
0.03
--
Subsurface Soil (0-36 inches bgs)
Uranium-238
--
pCi/g
--
--
~
~
~
--
~
~
~
--
--
--
~
~
~
~
--
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
--
~
Uranium-234
--
pCi/g
--
--
~
~
~
~
~
--
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
--
~
Thorium-230
--
pCi/g
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
--
--
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
--
~
Radium-226 in SE
1.5E+00
pCi/g
1.6E-06
~
~
1.9E-05
~
~
1.6E-10
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
--
--
--
2E-05
~
~
Aluminum
4.7E+03
mg/kg
--
0.0016
--
--
--
--
~
0.000013
~
--
--
--
~
~
~
--
--
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
0.002
--
Arsenic
1.1E+01
mg/kg
5.3E-07
0.0033
~
1.1E-07
0.00069
~
1.0E-10
0.0000044
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
6E-07
0.004
~
Barium
7.5E+01
mg/kg
--
0.00011
~
~
~
~
--
0.0000017
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
--
--
--
~
~
~
~
0.0001
~
Cadmium
7.3E-02
mg/kg
»
0.00019
~
~
0.000032
~
4.9E-13
0.000000076
~
~
~
~
--
-
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
5E-13
0.0002
~
Chromium
6.7E+00
mg/kg
--
0.00571
~
~
~
~
2.2E-10
0.000011514
~
~
~
~
~
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
--
--
--
2E-10
0.0060
~
Cobalt
4.5E+00
mg/kg
»
0.0050
»
»
»
--
2.0E-10
0.000010
~
--
--
--
~
~
~
»
--
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
2E-10
0.005
»
Copper
5.1E+00
mg/kg
--
0.000046
~
~
~
~
~
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
0.00005
~
Iron
1.5E+04
mg/kg
~
0.0073
~
~
~
~
--
--
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
--
--
--
~
~
~
~
0.007
~
Manganese
4.0E+02
mg/kg
~
0.0040
~
~
~
~
~
0.000077
~
~
~
~
--
--
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
0.004
~
Molybdenum
8.1E-01
mg/kg
~
0.000019
~
~
~
~
~
0.0000000019
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
--
--
--
~
0.00002
~
Selenium
1.5E+00
mg/kg
--
0.000075
~
~
~
--
~
0.00000000076
~
--
--
--
~
~
~
~
--
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
--
0.00008
~
Thallium
9.2E-02
mg/kg
~
0.0020
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
0.002
~
Uranium
2.9E+00
mg/kg
~
0.00016
~
~
~
~
--
0.000000031
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
--
--
--
~
~
~
~
0.0002
~
Vanadium
2.5E+01
mg/kg
~
0.000042
~
~
~
~
~
0.000000086
~
~
~
~
--
--
--
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
0.00004
~
Exposure Pathway
Risk/Hazard Total
2E-06
0.03
--
2E-05
0.0007
-
7E-10
0.0001
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
--
--
--
-
2E-05
0.03
--
Notes:
Not applicable
bgs Below ground surface
COPC Contaminant of potential concern
EPC Exposure point concentration
Kerr-McGee Kerr-McGee Corporation
mg/kg Milligram per kilogram
ODL Other Dine Lifeways
pCi/g Picocurie per gram
SE Secular equilibrium
Page 6 of 6
-------
Table C-7: Human Health Risk and Hazard Summary and Identification of Candidate
Contaminants of Concern
Church Rock Mine No. 1 - Kee'da'whii teeh (Full-Time Resident)
COPC3
Units
Exposure Point
Concentration
Cancer
Riskbcd
Noncancer Hazardbd e f
Adult Child
Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
Radionuclides9
Uranium-238
pCi/g
1.1
2.5E-05
—
--
Uranium-234
pCi/g
1.2
3.1E-05
—
--
Thorium-230
pCi/g
1.7
7.1E-05
—
--
Radium-226 in SE
pCi/g
6.7
1.3E-02
—
--
Radionuclide Total
1E-02
—
--
Metals h
Aluminum
mg/kg
4,600
--
0.18
0.27
Arsenic
mg/kg
4.9
2.0E-04
0.44
0.86
Barium
mg/kg
110
--
0.056
0.048
Cadmium
mg/kg
0.14
9.3E-08
0.16
0.27
Chromium
mg/kg
6.0
2.2E-04
0.054
0.13
Cobalt
mg/kg
6.10
6.0E-06
0.99
2.0
Copper
mg/kg
12
—
0.088
0.15
Iron
mg/kg
11,000
—
0.51
1.3
Manganese
mg/kg
160
—
3.6
2.1
Molybdenum
mg/kg
0.32
—
0.012
0.021
Selenium
mg/kg
3.4
—
0.075
0.19
Thallium
mg/kg
0.14
—
0.54
1.4
Uranium
mg/kg
7.3
—
0.96
2.3
Vanadium
mg/kg
14
—
0.080
0.17
Metal Total
4E-04
8
10
Cumulative Risk/Hazard Total
1E-02
8
10
Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs)
Radionuclides9
Uranium-238
pCi/g
1.1
2.5E-05
—
"
Uranium-234
pCi/g
1.2
3.1E-05
—
"
Thorium-230
pCi/g
1.7
7.1E-05
—
"
Radium-226 in SE
pCi/g
17
3.3E-02
—
"
Radionuclide Total
3E-02
—
"
Metals h
Aluminum
mg/kg
4,600
--
0.18
0.27
Arsenic
mg/kg
4.8
1.9E-04
0.43
0.84
Barium
mg/kg
110
--
0.06
0.05
Cadmium
mg/kg
0.14
9.3E-08
0.16
0.27
Chromium
mg/kg
6.0
2.2E-04
0.054
0.13
Cobalt
mg/kg
6.1
6.0E-06
0.99
2.0
Copper
mg/kg
12
—
0.09
0.15
Iron
mg/kg
11,000
—
0.51
1.3
Manganese
mg/kg
160
—
3.59
2.1
Molybdenum
mg/kg
0.32
—
0.012
0.021
Selenium
mg/kg
3.1
—
0.068
0.18
Thallium
mg/kg
0.14
—
0.54
1.4
Uranium
mg/kg
7.3
—
0.96
2.3
Vanadium
mg/kg
14
—
0.08
0.17
Metal Total
4E-04
8
10
Cumulative Risk/Hazard Total
3E-02
8
10
Page 1 of 7
-------
Table C-7: Human Health Risk and Hazard Summary and Identification of Candidate
Contaminants of Concern
Church Rock Mine No. 1 East - Kee'da'whii teeh (Full-Time Resident)
COPC3
Units
Exposure Point
Concentration
Cancer
Riskbod
Noncancer Hazardb d 8
Adult Child
Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
Radionuclides9
Uranium-238
pCi/g
1.3
3.0E-05
—
"
Uranium-234
pCi/g
1.4
3.6E-05
—
"
Thorium-230
pCi/g
3.6
2.3E-05
—
"
Radium-226 in SE
pCi/g
9.3
1.8E-02
—
"
Radionuclide Total
2E-02
—
"
Metals h
Aluminum
mg/kg
6,300
--
0.24
0.37
Arsenic
mg/kg
6.6
2.7E-04
0.59
1.2
Barium
mg/kg
160
--
0.082
0.070
Cadmium
mg/kg
0.13
8.7E-08
0.15
0.25
Chromium
mg/kg
10
3.7E-04
0.10
0.22
Cobalt
mg/kg
6.9
6.8E-06
1.1
2.3
Copper
mg/kg
13
—
0.10
0.16
Iron
mg/kg
16,000
—
0.74
1.9
Manganese
mg/kg
200
—
4.5
2.6
Molybdenum
mg/kg
0.31
—
0.012
0.020
Selenium
mg/kg
3.0
—
0.066
0.17
Thallium
mg/kg
0.16
—
0.62
1.6
Uranium
mg/kg
3.6
—
0.47
1.1
Vanadium
mg/kg
16
—
0.092
0.20
Metal Total
6E-04
8
10
Cumulative Risk/Hazard Total
2E-02
8
10
Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs)
Radionuclides9
Uranium-238
pCi/g
1.3
3.0E-05
—
"
Uranium-234
pCi/g
1.4
3.6E-05
—
"
Thorium-230
pCi/g
3.6
2.3E-05
—
"
Radium-226 in SE
pCi/g
43
8.3E-02
—
"
Radionuclide Total
8E-02
—
"
Metals h
Aluminum
mg/kg
6,300
--
0.24
0.37
Arsenic
mg/kg
6.3
2.5E-04
0.56
1.1
Barium
mg/kg
160
--
0.082
0.070
Cadmium
mg/kg
0.13
8.7E-08
0.15
0.25
Chromium
mg/kg
10
3.7E-04
0.10
0.2
Cobalt
mg/kg
6.9
6.8E-06
1.1
2.3
Copper
mg/kg
13
—
0.10
0.16
Iron
mg/kg
16,000
—
0.74
1.9
Manganese
mg/kg
200
—
4.5
2.6
Molybdenum
mg/kg
0.51
—
0.020
0.033
Selenium
mg/kg
5.4
—
0.12
0.31
Thallium
mg/kg
0.16
—
0.62
1.6
Uranium
mg/kg
42
—
5.5
13
Vanadium
mg/kg
18
—
0.10
0.22
Metal Total
6E-04
10
20
Cumulative Risk/Hazard Total
8E-02
10
20
Page 2 of 7
-------
Table C-7: Human Health Risk and Hazard Summary and Identification of Candidate
Contaminants of Concern
Kerr-McGee Ponds on the Navajo Nation - Kee'da'whii teeh (Full-Time Resident)
COPC3
Units
Exposure Point
Concentration
Cancer
Riskbcd
Noncancer Hazardb d 8
Adult Child
Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
Radionuclides9
Uranium-238
pCi/g
1.1
2.5E-05
—
--
Uranium-234
pCi/g
1.0
2.5E-05
—
--
Thorium-230
pCi/g
2.0
1.3E-05
—
--
Radium-226 in SE
pCi/g
9.3
1.8E-02
—
--
Radionuclide Total
2E-02
—
--
Metals h
Aluminum
mg/kg
6,900
--
0.27
0.41
Arsenic
mg/kg
5.9
2.4E-04
0.52
1.0
Barium
mg/kg
82
--
0.042
0.036
Cadmium
mg/kg
0.16
1.1E-07
0.18
0.31
Chromium
mg/kg
8.2
3.0E-04
0.078
0.18
Cobalt
mg/kg
5.2
5.2E-06
0.85
1.7
Copper
mg/kg
11
—
0.081
0.14
Iron
mg/kg
15,000
—
0.70
1.7
Manganese
mg/kg
230
-
5.2
3.0
Molybdenum
mg/kg
0.55
-
0.021
0.036
Selenium
mg/kg
2.9
—
0.064
0.16
Thallium
mg/kg
0.15
—
0.58
1.5
Uranium
mg/kg
6.2
—
0.81
1.9
Vanadium
mg/kg
17
—
0.10
0.21
Metal Total
5E-04
9
10
Cumulative Risk/Hazard Total
2E-02
9
10
Subsurface Soil (0-66 inches bgs)
Radionuclides9
Uranium-238
pCi/g
1.1
2.5E-05
—
"
Uranium-234
pCi/g
1.0
2.5E-05
—
"
Thorium-230
pCi/g
2.0
1.3E-05
—
"
Radium-226 in SE
pCi/g
9.3
1.8E-02
—
"
Radionuclide Total
2E-02
—
"
Metals h
Aluminum
mg/kg
6,900
--
0.27
0.41
Arsenic
mg/kg
5.9
2.4E-04
0.52
1.0
Barium
mg/kg
82
--
0.04
0.036
Cadmium
mg/kg
0.16
1.1E-07
0.18
0.31
Chromium
mg/kg
8.2
3.0E-04
0.078
0.18
Cobalt
mg/kg
5.2
5.2E-06
0.85
1.7
Copper
mg/kg
11
—
0.081
0.14
Iron
mg/kg
15,000
—
0.70
1.7
Manganese
mg/kg
230
—
5.2
3.0
Molybdenum
mg/kg
0.55
—
0.021
0.036
Selenium
mg/kg
2.9
—
0.064
0.16
Thallium
mg/kg
0.15
—
0.58
1.5
Uranium
mg/kg
6.2
—
0.81
1.9
Vanadium
mg/kg
17
—
0.10
0.21
Metal Total
5E-04
9
10
Cumulative Risk/Hazard Total
2E-02
9
10
Page 3 of 7
-------
Table C-7: Human Health Risk and Hazard Summary and Identification of Candidate
Contaminants of Concern
Kerr-McGee Ponds on United Nuclear Corporation Property
COPC3
Units
Exposure Point
Concentration
Cancer
RiskbGd
Noncancer Hazardb d 8
Adult Child
Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
Radionuclides9
Uranium-238
pCi/g
2.4
8.1E-08
—
—
Uranium-234
pCi/g
2.4
9.0E-08
—
—
Thorium-230
pCi/g
3.4
1.5E-07
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
pCi/g
13
2.4E-04
—
—
Radionuclide Total
2E-04
—
—
Metals h
Aluminum
mg/kg
6,600
--
0.0023
--
Arsenic
mg/kg
6.0
8.0E-07
0.0050
—
Barium
mg/kg
83
—
0.00014
—
Cadmium
mg/kg
0.11
9.8E-13
0.0004
—
Chromium
mg/kg
8.5
3.8E-10
0.0097
—
Cobalt
mg/kg
5.2
2.3E-10
0.0059
—
Copper
mg/kg
11
—
0.000094
—
Iron
mg/kg
15,000
—
0.0073
—
Manganese
mg/kg
220
—
0.0032
—
Molybdenum
mg/kg
0.57
—
0.000039
—
Selenium
mg/kg
4.0
—
0.00027
—
Thallium
mg/kg
0.14
—
0.0048
—
Uranium
mg/kg
7.7
—
0.013
—
Vanadium
mg/kg
19
—
0.0013
—
Metal Total
8E-07
0.05
—
Cumulative Risk/Hazard Total
2E-04
0.05
—
Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs)
Radionuclides9
Uranium-238
pCi/g
52
1.8E-06
—
—
Uranium-234
pCi/g
49
1.8E-06
—
—
Thorium-230
pCi/g
3.4
1.5E-07
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
pCi/g
12
2.2E-04
—
—
Radionuclide Total
2E-04
—
—
Metals h
Aluminum
mg/kg
6,600
--
0.0023
--
Arsenic
mg/kg
5.8
7.7E-07
0.0048
—
Barium
mg/kg
75
—
0.00013
—
Cadmium
mg/kg
0.093
8.3E-13
0.00037
—
Chromium
mg/kg
8.1
3.6E-10
0.0093
—
Cobalt
mg/kg
5.2
2.3E-10
0.0059
—
Copper
mg/kg
10
—
0.000084
—
Iron
mg/kg
15,000
—
0.0073
—
Manganese
mg/kg
220
—
0.0032
—
Molybdenum
mg/kg
0.63
—
0.000043
—
Selenium
mg/kg
3.7
—
0.00025
—
Thallium
mg/kg
0.14
—
0.0048
—
Uranium
mg/kg
25
—
0.043
—
Vanadium
mg/kg
18
—
0.0012
—
Metal Total
8E-07
0.08
—
Cumulative Risk/Hazard Total
2E-04
0.08
--
Page 4 of 7
-------
Table C-7: Human Health Risk and Hazard Summary and Identification of Candidate
Contaminants of Concern
Arroyos ori the Navajo Nation
COPCa
Units
Exposure Point
Concentration
Cancer
Riskbcd
Noncancer Hazardb d 8
Adult Child
Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
Radionuclides9
Uranium-238
pCi/g
--
--
--
--
Uranium-234
pCi/g
--
--
--
--
Thorium-230
pCi/g
--
--
--
--
Radium-226 in SE
pCi/g
1.3
3.6E-04
—
--
Radionuclide Total
4E-04
--
Metals h
Aluminum
mg/kg
4,700
--
0.10
0.011
Arsenic
mg/kg
11
1.5E-04
0.39
0.096
Barium
mg/kg
74
--
0.026
0.0013
Cadmium
mg/kg
0.064
4.0E-08
0.031
0.0051
Chromium
mg/kg
6.7
8.7E-05
0.024
0.0066
Cobalt
mg/kg
4.0
3.6E-06
0.25
0.076
Copper
mg/kg
5.1
—
0.015
0.0030
Iron
mg/kg
12,000
—
0.15
0.080
Manganese
mg/kg
200
—
3.4
0.12
Molybdenum
mg/kg
0.81
—
0.012
0.0025
Selenium
mg/kg
1.5
—
0.0037
0.0010
Thallium
mg/kg
0.09
—
0.081
0.066
Uranium
mg/kg
2.9
—
0.14
0.035
Vanadium
mg/kg
25
—
0.061
0.013
Metal Total
2E-04
5
0.5
Cumulative Risk/Hazard Total
6E-04
5
0.5
Subsurface Soil (0-36 inches bgs)
Radionuclides9
Uranium-238
pCi/g
--
--
--
--
Uranium-234
pCi/g
--
--
--
--
Thorium-230
pCi/g
--
--
--
--
Radium-226 in SE
pCi/g
1.5
3.6E-04
—
--
Radionuclide Total
4E-04
—
--
Metals h
Aluminum
mg/kg
4,700
--
0.10
0.011
Arsenic
mg/kg
11
1.5E-04
0.39
0.095
Barium
mg/kg
75
--
0.027
0.001
Cadmium
mg/kg
0.073
4.6E-08
0.035
0.006
Chromium
mg/kg
6.7
8.7E-05
0.024
0.0066
Cobalt
mg/kg
4.5
4.1E-06
0.28
0.085
Copper
mg/kg
5.1
--
0.02
0.003
Iron
mg/kg
15,000
--
0.19
0.101
Manganese
mg/kg
400
--
6.82
0.236
Molybdenum
mg/kg
0.81
--
0.01
0.002
Selenium
mg/kg
1.5
--
0.00
0.001
Thallium
mg/kg
0.092
--
0.08
0.066
Uranium
mg/kg
2.9
--
0.14
0.035
Vanadium
mg/kg
25
--
0.06
0.013
Metal Total
2E-04
8
0.7
Cumulative Risk/Hazard Total
6E-04
8
0.7
Page 5 of 7
-------
Table C-7: Human Health Risk and Hazard Summary and Identification of Candidate
Contaminants of Concern
Arroyos on United Nuclear Corporation Property
COPCa
Units
Exposure Point
Concentration
Cancer
Riskbcd
Noncancer Hazardb d 8
Adult Child
Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
Radionuclides 9
Uranium-238
pCi/g
--
—
—
—
Uranium-234
pCi/g
--
—
—
—
Thorium-230
pCi/g
--
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
pCi/g
1.1
2.0E-05
—
—
Radionuclide Total
2E-05
—
Metals h
Aluminum
mg/kg
4,400
—
0.0015
--
Arsenic
mg/kg
4.6
6.1E-07
0.0038
—
Barium
mg/kg
48
—
0.00008
—
Cadmium
mg/kg
0.054
4.8E-13
0.00022
—
Chromium
mg/kg
5.0
2.2E-10
0.0057
—
Cobalt
mg/kg
4.4
2.0E-10
0.0050
—
Copper
mg/kg
4.7
—
0.000040
—
Iron
mg/kg
13,000
—
0.0064
—
Manganese
mg/kg
240
—
0.0035
—
Molybdenum
mg/kg
0.28
—
0.000019
—
Selenium
mg/kg
1.1
—
0.000075
—
Thallium
mg/kg
0.057
—
0.0020
—
Uranium
mg/kg
0.091
—
0.00016
—
Vanadium
mg/kg
0.53
—
0.000036
—
Metal Total
6E-07
0.03
—
Cumulative Risk/Hazard Total
// Oh
0.03
--
Subsurface Soil (0-18 inches bgs)
Radionuclides9
Uranium-238
pCi/g
--
—
—
—
Uranium-234
pCi/g
--
—
—
—
Thorium-230
pCi/g
--
—
—
—
Radium-226 in SE
pCi/g
1.1
2.0E-05
—
—
Radionuclide Total
2E-05
—
—
Metals h
Aluminum
mg/kg
4,700
—
0.0015
--
Arsenic
mg/kg
4.8
6.4E-07
0.0038
—
Barium
mg/kg
62
—
0.000084
—
Cadmium
mg/kg
0.055
4.9E-13
0.00022
—
Chromium
mg/kg
5.0
2.2E-10
0.0057
—
Cobalt
mg/kg
4.4
2.0E-10
0.0050
—
Copper
mg/kg
5.4
—
0.000040
—
Iron
mg/kg
15,000
—
0.0064
—
Manganese
mg/kg
280
—
0.0035
—
Molybdenum
mg/kg
0.28
—
0.000019
—
Selenium
mg/kg
1.1
—
0.000075
—
Thallium
mg/kg
0.059
—
0.0020
—
Uranium
mg/kg
0.091
—
0.00016
—
Vanadium
mg/kg
0.62
—
0.000036
—
Metal Total
6E-07
0.03
—
Cumulative Risk/Hazard Total
2E-05
0.03
~
Page 6 of 7
-------
Table C-7: Human Health Risk and Hazard Summary and Identification of Candidate
Contaminants of Concern
Notes:
a Bolded COPCs are selected as candidate COCs because cancer risk is greater than one in ten thousand (1E-04)
or noncancer hazard is greater than 1. Italicized COPCs are contaminants within the USEPA's cancer risk range
(cancer risk greater or equal to 1E-04 and less than 1 in 1 million [1E-06]).
b Bolded values are values greater than the target cancer risk of one in ten thousand (1E-04) or noncancer target
hazard of 1. Italicized values are within the USEPA's acceptable cancer risk range (cancer risk greater or equal to
1E-04 and less than 1E-06). Total risks and total hazards are reported to one significant digit; thus, values are
commonly rounded. In practice, values can be slightly higher than the stated cutoff but still be considered equal to
the cutoff because of rounding. Target organ analyses were performed for any scenario-media combination with
a noncancer hazard greater than 1. If the target organ exceeds hazard index exceeds 1 but no individual COPC
has a hazard exceeding 1, the COPC contributing the highest amount of hazard was identified as a candidate
COC.
c Cancer risks are provided on Table C-5.1 through Table C-5.6.
d The methodology for calculating the risks and hazards and the inputs for cancer and noncancer equations are
provided in the "Navajo Abandoned Uranium Mines Risk Assessment Methodology" (USEPA 2024b).
e Noncancer hazards are presented on Table C-5.1 through Table C-5.6.
f Thallium was retained as a candidate COC because the target organ analysis resulted in a hazard index of 3 for the dermal
target organ and thallium has the highest contribution to the target organ HI as follows:
Metal
Target Organ(s)
Adult Target Organ HI
Aluminum
Nervous
-
-
Nervous
4
Arsenic
Cardiovascular
Dermal
-
Dermal
1
Barium
Urinary
-
-
Urinary
2
Cadmium
Urinary
-
-
Gastrointestinal
1
Cobalt
Endocrine
-
-
Copper
Gastrointestinal
-
-
Child Target Organ HI
Iron
Gastrointestinal
-
-
Nervous
3
Manganese
Nervous
-
-
Dermal
3
Molybdenum
Urinary
-
-
Urinary
5
Selenium
Dermal
Hematologic
Nervous
Gastrointestinal
1
Thallium
Dermal
-
-
Uranium
Urinary
-
-
Vanadium
Urinary
Dermal
-
g For radionuclides, uranium-238 is assumed to be in secular equilibrium with its decay chain; that is, all decay chain
nuclides are present in equal activity concentrations. In this case, the risk from radium-226 and its decay products
(that is, radium-226 in secular equilibrium) will account for most of the risk from the uranium-238 decay chain.
" In the absence of speciated chromium data, chromium is evaluated using the assumption that it is 100 percent
hexavalent chromium (USEPA 2024b). No speciated chromium data are available.
-
Not applicable
bgs
Below ground surface
COC
Contaminant of concern
COPC
Contaminant of potential concern
EU
Exposure unit
HI
Hazard index
Kerr-McGee
Kerr-McGee Corporation
mg/kg
Milligram per kilogram
pCi/g
Picocurie per gram
SE
Secular equilbrium
USEPA
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Reference:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2024b. "Navajo Abandoned Uranium Mines Risk Assessment
Methodology." Draft Final. March.
Page 7 of 7
-------
Table C-8. Ecological Risk Assessment Screening for Soil
Constituent of Interest3
Detection
Frequency13
Maximum
Detected
Concentration13
Plant
NOEC
Soil
Invertebrates
NOEC
Avian
Herbivore
NOEC
Avian
Ground
Insectivore
NOEC
Avian
Carnivore
NOEC
Mammalian
Herbivore
NOEC
Mammalian
Ground
Insectivore
NOEC
Mammalian
Carnivore
NOEC
Minimum
NOEC
HQ based on
Minimum
NOECc
Include
Contaminant
as COPEC in
SLERA
Refinement?01
Radionuclides (pCi/q) 8
Uranium-238
41 / 160
52.1
50
13,000
2,700
2,700
2,700
1,400
1,400
1,400
50
1.0
Yes
Uranium-234
24 / 24
49.4
44
12,000
2,800
2,800
2,800
1,400
1,400
1,400
44
1.1
Yes
Thorium-230
41 / 41
92
110
37,000
8,700
8,700
8,700
3,700
3,700
3,700
110
0.84
No
Radium-226 in SE
(Adjusted Radium-226)
797 / 797
468
5.0
240
15
15
15
6.0
6.0
6.0
5.0
94
Yes
Metals (mq/kq) f 9
Aluminum
126 / 126
9,600
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
No
Antimony
125 / 126
0.26
11
78
NSL
NSL
NSL
10
0.27
4.9
0.27
0.96
No
Arsenic
175 / 175
11
18
6J3
67
43
1,100
170
46
170
6.8
1.6
Yes
Barium
169 / 169
420
110
330
720
820
7.500
3,200
200
9,100
110
3.8
Yes
Beryllium
126 / 126
1.0
2j5
40
NSL
NSL
NSL
21
34
90
2.5
0.40
No
Cadmium
154 / 169
0.3
32
140
28
0.77
630
73
0.36
84
0.36
0.69
No
Chromium h
169 / 169
24
0.35
0.34
78
26
780
380
34
180
0.3
71
Yes
Cobalt
126 / 126
10
13
NSL
270
120
1,300
2,100
230
470
13
0.77
No
Copper
126 / 126
21
70
80
76
28
1,600
1,100
49
560
28
0.75
No
Iron
126 / 126
23,000
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
No
Lead
169 / 169
130
120
1,700
46
11
510
1,200
56
460
11
12
Yes
Manganese
126 / 126
400
220
450
4,300
4,300
650,000
5,300
4,000
6,200
220
1.8
Yes
Molybdenum IJ
165 / 175
1.8
2
NSL
18
15
90
635
4.8
64
2
0.90
No
Nickel
126 / 126
20
38
280
210
20
2,800
340
10
130
10
2.0
Yes
Selenium
170 / 175
37
0.52
4.1
2.2
1.2
83
2.7
0.63
2.8
0.52
71
Yes
Silver
29 / 169
0.19
560
NSL
69
4.2
930
1,500
14
990
4.2
0.045
No
Thallium
126 / 126
0.22
0.050
NSL
-------
Table C-8. Ecological Risk Assessment Screening for Soil
Notes (Continued):
bgs
Below ground surface
Contaminant of potential ecological concern
Ecological soil screening level
Environmental Risk from Ionizing Contaminants: Assessment and Management
Ecological screening level
Hazard quotient
Los Alamos National Laboratory
mg/kg
N3B
NOEC
Milligram per kilogram
Newport News Nuclear BWXT-Los Alamos, LLC
No observed effect concentration
No screening level
Picocurie per gram
Secular equilibrium
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
COPEC
Eco-SSL
ERICA
ESL
NSL
pCi/g
SE
HQ
LANL
USEPA
References:
Brown, J.E., B. Alfonso, R. Avila, N.A. Beresford, D. Copplestone, G. PrOhl, and A. Ulanovsky. 2008. "The ERICA Tool." Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. Volume 99, Issue 9. Pages 1371 through 1383.
Efroymson, R.A., M.E. Will, and G.W. Suter II. 1997. "Toxicological Benchmarks for Contaminants of Potential Concern for Effects on Soil and Litter Invertebrates and Heterotrophic Process." ES/ER/TM-126/R2. Oak Ridge National Laboratories,
Oak Ridge, TN.
Efroymson, R.A., M.E. Will, G.W. Suter II, and A.C. Wooten. 1997. "Toxicological Benchmarks for Screening Contaminants of Potential Concern for Effects on Terrestrial Plants." ES/ER/TM-85/R3. Oak Ridge National Laboratories, Oak Ridge, TN.
Newport News Nuclear BWXT-Los Alamos, LLC (N3B). 2022. "ECORISK Database." Release 4.3. 701067. Document EM2020-0575. September.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2023a. "Interim Ecological Soil Screening Level Documents." Accessed July 20. https://www.epa.gov/chemical-research/interim-ecological-soil-screening-level-documents.
USEPA. 2024b. "Navajo Abandoned Uranium Mines Risk Assessment Methodology." Draft Final. March.
Page 2 of 2
-------
Table C-9. Exposure Point Concentrations for Ecological Risk Assessment
Site-Wide
Contaminant
Units
Detection
Frequency
Number of
High
Nondetect
Results3
Maximum
Concentration
(qualifier)
Location of
Maximum
Concentration
Arithmetic
Meanb
UCL95 /
Distribution
Exposure Point
Concentration
Valued
Statisticd
Method®
Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
Uranium-238
pCi/g
10 / 10
-
2.43
KMP-SS66-0000-0003-01
1.285
1.553
NP
1.6
UCL95
(14)
Uranium-234
pCi/g
10 / 10
-
2.43
KMP-SS50-0000-0003-01
1.299
1.628
N
1.6
UCL95
(2)
Thorium-230
pCi/g
10 / 10
-
3.57
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-01
1.948
2.494
N
2.5
UCL95
(2)
Radium-226
pCi/g
375 / 375
-
86.3
CESS-041 (2-6)
4.93
5.859
NP
5.9
UCL95
(14)
Arsenic
mg/kg
108 / 108
-
11
KMP-12-00
5.453
5.663
G
5.7
UCL95
(6)
Barium
mg/kg
108 / 108
-
420
CR1E-SS15-0000-0003-01
84.68
93.64
NP
94
UCL95
(14)
Chromium
mg/kg
108 / 108
-
24
KMP-SS75-0000-0003-02
7.083
7.576
NP
7.6
UCL95
(14)
Lead
mg/kg
108 / 108
-
130
KM P-SS75-0000-0003-02
11.85
13.93
NP
14
UCL95
(14)
Manganese
mg/kg
85 / 85
-
310
KMP-SS77-0000-0003-01
184
191.5
N
190
UCL95
(2)
Nickel
mg/kg
85 / 85
-
20
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-01
7.839
8.287
LN
8.3
UCL95
(14)
Selenium
mg/kg
118 / 118
-
21
KMP-17-00
2.569
3.004
NP
3.0
UCL95
(14)
Thallium
mg/kg
84 / 85
0
0.22
CR1E-SS12-0000-0003-01
0.129
0.135
G
0.14
UCL95
(7)
Uranium
mg/kg
164 / 164
-
61
RWPR-SS-002 (1.5-2)
5.071
6.24
LN
6.2
UCL95
(14)
Vanadium
mg/kg
108 / 108
-
41
KMP-17-00
15.75
16.61
NP
17
UCL95
(14)
Zinc
mg/kg
85 / 85
-
95
KMP-SS75-0000-0003-01
45.41
47.86
NP
48
UCL95
(14)
Page 1 of 3
-------
Table C-9. Exposure Point Concentrations for Ecological Risk Assessment
Site-Wide
Contaminant
Units
Detection
Frequency
Number of
High
Nondetect
Results3
Maximum
Concentration
(qualifier)
Location of
Maximum
Concentration
Arithmetic
Meanb
UCL95 /
Distribution
Exposure Point
Concentration
Valued
Statisticd
Method®
Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs)
Uranium-238
pCi/g
14 / 14
-
51.5
KMP-SB28-0060-0066-01
4.842
12
NP
12
UCL95
(14)
Uranium-234
pCi/g
14 / 14
-
49.4
KM P-SB28-0060-0066-01
4.699
11.53
NP
12
UCL95
(14)
Thorium-230
pCi/g
14 / 14
-
3.57
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-01
1.707
2.123
N
2.1
UCL95
(2)
Radium-226
pCi/g
683 / 683
-
468
C1LP-401 SS4 4.5-6
12.82
15.6
NP
16
UCL95
(14)
Arsenic
mg/kg
160 / 160
-
11
KMP-12-00
5.408
5.565
LN
5.6
UCL95
(14)
Barium
mg/kg
154 / 154
-
420
CR1E-SS15-0000-0003-01
78.08
84.27
NP
84
UCL95
(14)
Chromium
mg/kg
154 / 154
-
24
KMP-SS75-0000-0003-02
7.128
7.491
NP
7.5
UCL95
(14)
Lead
mg/kg
154 / 154
-
130
KM P-SS75-0000-0003-02
11.01
12.55
NP
13
UCL95
(14)
Manganese
mg/kg
115 / 115
-
400
KMA-SS02-0012-0018-01
194.3
201.5
LN
200
UCL95
(14)
Nickel
mg/kg
115 / 115
-
20
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-01
7.787
8.138
LN
8.1
UCL95
(14)
Selenium
mg/kg
171 / 176
0
37
KMP-16-18
2.553
3.066
NP
3.1
UCL95
(15)
Thallium
mg/kg
113 / 115
0
0.22
CR1E-SS12-0000-0003-01
0.13
0.135
N
0.14
UCL95
(3)
Uranium
mg/kg
213 / 213
-
210
CELI-502 SS3 3-4.5
12.13
15.61
NP
16
UCL95
(14)
Vanadium
mg/kg
160 / 160
-
58
KMP-16-18
15.7
16.43
NP
16
UCL95
(14)
Zinc
mg/kg
115 / 115
-
95
KMP-SS75-0000-0003-01
43.6
45.5
NP
46
UCL95
(14)
Notes:
a Number of nondetect results that exceeded the maximum detected concentration. These results were not included in the statistical calculations.
b The arithmetic mean for datasets with nondetected results is calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
c Tested using the Shapiro-Wilk W or Lilliefors test for normal and lognormal distributions and the Anderson-Darling and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests for gamma
distributions. A 5 percent level of significance was used in all tests. Distribution tests were conducted only for samples with at least four detected results.
Distributions not confirmed as N, LN, or G were treated as NP in all statistical calculations.
d The EPC is the lesser of the UCL95 (or UCL99) and the maximum detected concentration. The maximum detected concentration is the default when there are
fewer than 10 samples or fewer than four detected results. See Appendix D of USEPA (2024b).
8 The statistical methods for selecting the exposure point concentration are as follows (not all are used):
(1)
Maximum detected concentration
(7)
95%
Gamma Approximate KM-UCL
(13)
95%
KM BCAUCL
(2)
95% Student's t UCL
(8)
95%
H-UCL
(14)
95%
Percentile Bootstrap UCL
(3)
95% KM (t) UCL
(9)
95%
H-UCL (KM log)
(15)
95%
KM Percentile Bootstrap UCL
(4)
95% Adjusted Gamma UCL
(10)
95%
Bootstrap-t UCL
(16)
99%
Bootstrap-t UCL
(5)
95% Gamma Adjusted KM-UCL
(11)
95%
KM Bootstrap-t UCL
(17)
99%
KM Percentile Bootstrap UCL
(6)
95% Approximate Gamma UCL
(12)
95%
BCAUCL
Page 2 of 3
-------
Table C-9. Exposure Point Concentrations for Ecological Risk Assessment
Notes (Continued):
BCA
Bias-corrected accelerated bootstrap method
bgs
Below ground surface
EPC
Exposure point concentration
G (data qualifier)
Sample density differs by more than 15% of the LCS density.
G (distribution)
Gamma distribution
H-UCL
UCL based upon Land's H-statistic
KM
Kaplan-Meier
LN
Lognormal distribution
M3
The requested MDC was not met, but the reported activity is greater than the reported MDC
N
Normal distribution
ND
Not detected
NP
Nonparametric distribution
pCi/g
Picocurie per gram
UCL
Upper confidence limit
UCL95
95 percent upper confidence limit
UCL99
99 percent upper confidence limit
USEPA
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Reference:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2024b. "Navajo Abandoned Uranium Mines Risk Assessment Methodology." Draft Final. March.
Page 3 of 3
-------
Table C-10. Comparison of Individual Sample Results to Plant and Invertebrate NOECs
Sample ID
Sample
Depth
Bottom
COPEC3:
Uranium-
238
Uranium-
234
Thorium-
230
Radium-226 in
SE (Adjusted
Radium-226)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromiumb
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
Plant NOECc:
50
44
110
5.0
NSL
11
18
110
2.5
32
0.35
13
70
NSL
120
220
2
38
0.52
NSL
0.050
25
60
160
Soil Invertebrate
NOECc:
13,000
12,000
37,000
240
NSL
78
6.8
330
40
140
0.34
NSL
80
NSL
1,700
450
NSL
280
4.1
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
120
Units:
pCi/g
pCi/g
pCi/g
pCi/g
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
Church Rock Mine No. 1 - Surface Soil (0 - 6 inches bgs)
C1 LI-005.1 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
2.61
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-016.1 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
1.14
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-026.1 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
2.22
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-037.1 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
1.37
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LI-047.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
7.90
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-058.1 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
7.37
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LI-058.4 Dup
6
-
-
-
9.60
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LI-063.1 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
7.31
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-068.1 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
3.79
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-078.1 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
1.50
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-085.1 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
2.72
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-091.4 Dup
6
-
-
-
1.38
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-099.1 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
1.85
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-107.1 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
1.05
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-110.1 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
0.98
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LI-120.1 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
1.05
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-127.4 Dup
6
-
-
-
4.85
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-131.1 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
1.21
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-140.4 Dup
6
-
-
-
1.86
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-141.1 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
8.90
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LP-004.1 (0-6) Dup
6
-
-
-
1.35
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LP-009.1 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
47.10
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LP-015.1 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
35.80
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LP-019.1 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
4.90
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LP-020.1 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
26.60
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LP-026.1 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
12.50
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-031.1 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
2.23
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LP-037.1 (0-6) Dup
6
-
-
-
2.25
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-042.1 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
2.02
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LP-048.1 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
3.23
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LP-052.1 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
1.30
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LP-053.1 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
2.97
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LP-059.1 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
2.30
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LP-064.1 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
1.33
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LP-070.1 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
1.77
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LP-075.1 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
2.08
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-081.1 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
1.43
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LW-002.1 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
1.68
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LW-013.1 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
3.49
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LW-020.1 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
2.36
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LW-022.1 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
1.24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LW-034.1 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
2.09
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LW-041.1 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
1.37
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LW-048.1 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
2.01
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LW-050.1 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
1.87
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LW-062.1 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
1.40
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LW-067.1 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
7.02
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LW-069.1 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
1.27
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LW-083.1 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
1.89
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LW-090.1 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
1.84
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LW-097.1 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
2.20
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LW-104.1 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
1.48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1SS-026.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
26.90
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1SS-026.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
31.80
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1SS-041.1 (0-2) Dup
2
-
-
-
2.52
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1SS-041.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.55
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1SS-063A.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
41.20
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1SS-063A.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
8.40
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1SS-069.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
4.68
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1SS-069.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.81
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1SS-082.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
1.43
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1SS-082.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.17
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1SS-125.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
1.29
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CR1-SS05-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
-
3300
0.088
3.6
68
0.47
0.083
4
4.4
6.3
7900
8.7
120
0.15
4.7
1.1
0.058 U
0.098
1.5
11
35
CR1-SS06-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
-
5800
-
5.8
-
0.87
0.22
6.1
7.9
19
11000
17
150
0.42
9
1.9
0.1
0.2
-
14
70
Page 1 of 12
-------
Table C-10. Comparison of Individual Sample Results to Plant and Invertebrate NOECs
Sample ID
Sample
Depth
Bottom
COPEC3:
Uranium-
238
Uranium-
234
Thorium-
230
Radium-226 in
SE (Adjusted
Radium-226)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium13
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
Plant NOECc:
50
44
110
5.0
NSL
11
18
110
2.5
32
0.35
13
70
NSL
120
220
2
38
0.52
NSL
0.050
25
60
160
Soil Invertebrate
NOECc:
13,000
12,000
37,000
240
NSL
78
6.8
330
40
140
0.34
NSL
80
NSL
1,700
450
NSL
280
4.1
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
120
Units:
pCi/g
pCi/g
pCi/g
pCi/g
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
CR1-SS06-0000-0003-02
3
-
-
-
1.9
-
0.19
-
86
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2.7
-
-
CR1-SS07-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
2.87
4500
0.098
3.5
87
0.54
0.1
4.1
8
9.2
11000
10
170
0.18
5
1.2
0.06 U
0.15
4.6
11
41
CR1-SS08-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
3.13
4400
0.16
5.3
89
0.63
0.12
4.9
5.6
9.9
11000
10
170
0.29
6.5
1.7
0.058 U
0.14
3.2
13
43
CR1-SS09-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
8.6
5900
0.19
5.3
65
0.8
0.21
6.8
7
16
13000
15
160
0.37
9.2
3.2
0.072
0.16
9
17
61
CR1-SS10-0000-0003-01
3
0.82
0.81
0.86
1.23
3100
0.14
5.9
43
0.5
0.13
3.4
6.1
10
11000
11
140
0.28
5.9
1.3
0.062 U
0.13
1.4
12
45
CR1-SS11-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
1.29
4100
0.12
4.6
78
0.61
0.12
4.3
6.1
10
10000
10
150
0.25
6.2
1.8
0.058 U
0.12
1
12
45
CR1-SS12-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
1.16
3600
0.038
2.9
36
0.56
0.038 U
4.1
6.2
3.9
9900
7.2
150
0.16
6.5
1.2
0.057 U
0.067
1.6
12
52
CR1-SS13-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
2.25
4400
0.18
4.8
85
0.68
0.14
4.7
6.1
12
11000
11
160
0.34
7.2
1.6
0.059
0.13
4.6
13
47
CR1-SS14-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
-
3700
0.12
4.2
77
0.52
0.13
4
4.8
8
9200
9.1
140
0.21
5.2
1.3
0.065 U
0.14
1.5
12
38
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-01
3
1.02
0.91
1.71
2.29
-
-
-
-
-
0.1
-
-
5.9
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.058 U
0.094
-
-
38
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-02
3
-
-
-
-
4300
0.097
4.2
120
0.46
-
4.8
3.9
-
9400
7.8
130
0.32
4.6
1.2
-
-
1.8
12
-
CR1-SS16-0000-0003-01
3
1.12
1.21
1.46
1.73
4300
0.14
5
94
0.62
0.13
4.5
6
16
10000
10
160
0.27
6.5
1.4
0.059 U
0.14
1.7
12
42
CR1-SS17-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
0.82
2300
0.1
3.7
80
0.32
0.065
2.7
3.7
5
7300
6.9
120
0.19
3.9
0.79
0.057 U
0.1
0.61
8.6
27
CR1-SS18-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
1.33
3900
0.14
4.7
90
0.57
0.13
4.6
5.7
10
9200
10
150
0.23
6.4
1.3
0.057 U
0.11
1.2
12
41
CR1-SS19-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
18.20
3500
0.11
4.1
210
0.45
0.081
4.2
4.3
6.9
9200
7.7
190
0.39
5.1
4.5
0.057 U
0.097
CO
CO
15
38
CR1-SS20-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
1.19
2900
0.076
3.8
54
0.38
0.086
3
4.3
6.1
7800
7.7
100
0.18
4.2
1.1
0.057 U
0.093
1.1
9.3
32
CR1-SS21-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
2.27
7000
0.22
5.9
100
0.97
0.25
7.5
8.3
21
13000
18
180
0.4
11
2.1
0.1
0.21
3.1
17
70
CR1-SS22-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
-
-
0.13
5.3
110
-
0.14
-
6.4
-
12000
12
-
-
-
1.6
-
0.15
1.6
15
56
CR1-SS22-0000-0003-02
3
-
-
-
-
5900
-
-
-
0.71
-
12
-
14
-
-
180
0.53
CO
CO
-
0.076
-
-
-
-
CR1-SS23-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
1.54
5600
0.14
5.8
98
0.8
0.19
6
7.3
17
12000
14
180
0.27
9.6
1.8
0.081
0.18
1.2
15
62
CR1-SS24-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
19.20
6200
0.11
5.3
330
0.78
0.18
6.4
6.9
15
12000
14
200
0.35
8.7
4.4
0.09
0.17
21
19
62
CR1-SS25-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
2.94
4600
0.13
6.1
98
0.62
0.17
5.2
6.3
12
12000
11
200
0.34
7.2
1.9
0.065
0.13
1.9
15
60
CR1-SS26-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
28.50
4400
0.16
6.1
100
0.71
0.15
4.6
5.7
12
13000
12
170
0.61
7.4
9.5
0.062 U
0.15
55
20
48
CR1-SS27-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
4.68
3300
0.15
4.3
66
0.5
0.12
3.7
5
9.4
9800
8.9
140
0.27
5.7
2.7
0.059 U
0.097
4.9
13
43
CR1-SS28-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
28.00
3600
0.11
3.5
66
0.43
0.12
5.6
4
7.6
8400
11
130
0.26
6.8
14
0.062 U
0.089
20
20
37
CR1-SS29-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
3.21
4400
0.12
4.7
95
0.62
0.15
5.3
5.7
12
9600
11
170
0.27
7.6
1.7
0.058 U
0.11
3.4
13
47
CR1-SS30-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
2.12
4000
0.089
4.3
66
0.49
0.11
4.5
5.2
7.8
9300
9.1
140
0.2
6.1
1.4
0.061 U
0.11
1.6
11
49
CR1-SS31 -0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
6.28
4600
0.078
3.6
41
0.44
0.11
6.2
3.4
5.7
10000
10
100
0.21
5.3
2.2
0.058 U
0.075
12
13
31
CR1-SS32-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
6.30
4200
0.13
4.1
83
0.57
0.13
13
6.3
12
9900
9.8
150
0.28
16
2.3
0.058 U
0.12
4.8
15
42
CR1-SS33-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
0.60
1400
0.055
3
63
0.2
0.051
2.3
2.5
3.2
5000
4.8
89
0.15
2.7
0.47
0.057 U
0.048
0.37
5.4
18
CR1-SS34-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
1.13
4800
0.14
5
86
0.62
0.12
5.2
5.8
11
11000
11
160
0.27
7.2
1.3
0.061
0.14
0.91
13
46
RWPR-SS-001 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
4.54
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8.7
-
-
RWPR-SS-002 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
2.90
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4.8
-
-
RWPR-SS-002 (1.5-2)
2
-
-
-
48.50
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
61
-
-
RWPR-SS-002 (2.5-3)
3
-
-
-
17.30
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
39
-
-
RWPR-SS-003 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
2.65
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3.5
-
-
RWPR-SS-003 (2-5)
5
-
-
-
1.34
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2.5
-
-
RWPR-SS-004 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
8.90
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
8.2
-
-
RWPR-SS-004 (1.5-2)
2
-
-
-
1.32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2.1
-
-
RWPR-SS-004 (2.5-3)
3
-
-
-
0.77
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1.3
-
-
RWPR-SS-005 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
1.55
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2.1
-
-
RWPR-SS-005 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.72
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1.6
-
-
RWPR-SS-006 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
4.89
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3.7
-
-
RWPR-SS-006 (1.5-1.9)
1.9
-
-
-
2.15
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1.9
-
-
RWPR-SS-007 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
2.01
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
RWPR-SS-008 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
5.17
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7.3
-
-
RWPR-SS-009 (0-6) C
6
-
-
-
2.09
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1.7
-
-
RWPR-SS-009 (1.5-2)
2
-
-
-
0.56
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.82
-
-
RWPR-SS-009 (2.5-3)
3
-
-
-
0.76
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.6
-
-
RWPR-SS-010(0-6)
6
-
-
-
17.30
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9.4
-
-
RWPR-SS-010 (1.5-2)
2
-
-
-
2.62
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5.9
-
-
RWPR-SS-010(2.5-3)
3
-
-
-
1.62
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2.4
-
-
RWPR-SS-011 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
3.73
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2.8
-
-
RWPR-SS-011 (1.5-2)
2
-
-
-
0.96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.97
-
-
RWPR-SS-011 (2.5-3)
3
-
-
-
0.63
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.68
-
-
RWPR-SS-012 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
12.2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
10
-
-
RWPR-SS-012 (1.5-2)
2
-
-
-
2.08
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2.6
-
-
RWPR-SS-012 (2.5-3)
3
-
-
-
1.12
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2.2
-
-
RWPR-SS-014 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
3.56
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3.3
-
-
RWPR-SS-014(1.5-2)
2
-
-
-
7.18
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
RWPR-SS-019 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
6.28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6.2
-
-
RWPR-SS-019 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
7.2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6.5
-
-
RWPR-SS-019 (1.5-2)
2
-
-
-
1.64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1.3
-
-
RWPR-SS-019 (2.5-3)
3
-
-
-
0.87
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1.2
-
-
RWPR-SS-019 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
2.23
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
RWPR-SS-020 (0-6) C
6
-
-
-
18
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4.2
-
-
Page 2 of 12
-------
Table C-10. Comparison of Individual Sample Results to Plant and Invertebrate NOECs
Sample ID
Sample
Depth
Bottom
COPEC3:
Uranium-
238
Uranium-
234
Thorium-
230
Radium-226 in
SE (Adjusted
Radium-226)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromiumb
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
Plant NOECc:
50
44
110
5.0
NSL
11
18
110
2.5
32
0.35
13
70
NSL
120
220
2
38
0.52
NSL
0.050
25
60
160
Soil Invertebrate
NOECc:
13,000
12,000
37,000
240
NSL
78
6.8
330
40
140
0.34
NSL
80
NSL
1,700
450
NSL
280
4.1
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
120
Units:
pCi/g
pCi/g
pCi/g
pCi/g
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
RWPR-SS-020 (1.5-2)
2
-
-
-
7.7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5.8
-
-
RWPR-SS-020 (2.5-3)
3
-
-
-
3.42
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5.3
-
-
RWPR-SS-021 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
6.22
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4.7
-
-
RWPR-SS-021 (1.5-2)
2
-
-
-
1.67
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2.2
-
-
RWPR-SS-021 (2.5-3)
3
-
-
-
1.33
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
RWPR-SS-021 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.19
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2.4
-
-
RWPR-SS-023 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
1.67
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1.3
-
-
RWPR-SS-023 (1.5-2)
2
-
-
-
1.44
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1.1
-
-
RWPR-SS-023 (2.5-3)
3
-
-
-
1.56
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1.2
-
-
RWPR-SS-025 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.61
-
-
RWPR-SS-025 (0-6) Dup
6
-
-
-
1.07
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
RWPR-SS-028 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
1.26
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.78
-
-
RWPR-SS-028 (1.5-2)
2
-
-
-
1.15
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1.2
-
-
RWPR-SS-028 (2.5-3)
3
-
-
-
2.20
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1.5
-
-
RWPR-SS-029 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
0.79
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2.9
-
-
RWPR-SS-211 (0-6)
6
-
-
-
3.90
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2.8
-
-
RWPR-SS-211 (1.5-2)
2
-
-
-
1.03
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.96
-
-
RWPR-SS-211 (2.5-3)
3
-
-
-
0.75
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.63
-
-
RWPR-SS-221 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
7.40
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4.6
-
-
RWPR-SS-221 (1.5-2)
2
-
-
-
1.65
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3.5
-
-
RWPR-SS-221 (2.5-3)
3
-
-
-
1.57
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
RWPR-SS-221 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.38
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2.7
-
-
Frequency of Plant NOEC Exceedance:
0/3
0/3
0/3
34/146
0/30
0/30
0/30
3/30
0/30
0/30
30/30
0/30
0/30
0/30
0/30
0/30
0/30
0/30
29/30
0/30
29/30
3/86
0/30
0/30
Frequency of Soil Invertebrate NOEC Exceedance:
0/3
0/3
0/3
0/146
0/30
0/30
0/30
0/30
0/30
0/30
30/30
0/30
0/30
0/30
0/30
0/30
0/30
0/30
4/30
0/30
0/30
0/86
0/30
0/30
Frequency of Plant and Soil Invertebrate Exceedance:
0/3
0/3
0/3
34/146
0/30
0/30
0/30
3/30
0/30
0/30
30/30
0/30
0/30
0/30
0/30
0/30
0/30
0/30
29/30
0/30
29/30
3/86
0/30
0/30
Church Rock Mine No. 1 - Subsurface Soil (6 - 72 inches bgs) d
C1-1B008-5 (FD)
72
-
-
-
9.6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1-BO01-5
72
-
-
-
0.868
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1-B003-5
72
-
-
-
2.86
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1-B006-5
72
-
-
-
0.59
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1-B007-5
72
-
-
-
16.3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-005.2 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
1.9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-005.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
1.63
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-016.2 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
5.23
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-016.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
2.88
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-026.2 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
4.71
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-026.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
1.98
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-037.2 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
3.89
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-037.4 Dup
36
-
-
-
5.36
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-047.2 (8-14) Dup
14
-
-
-
8.4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-058.2 (9-15)
15
-
-
-
3.51
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-068.2 (10-16)
16
-
-
-
1.71
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-078.2 (14-20)
20
-
-
-
2.72
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-085.2 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
1.59
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-085.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
1.47
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-091.2 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
1.48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-091.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
1.6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-099.2 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
1.31
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LI-099.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
1.1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-107.2 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
1.31
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-107.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
1.14
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-110.2 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
1.17
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-110.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
0.84
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LI-120.2 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
1.38
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LI-120.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
1.33
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LI-127.2 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
2.12
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LI-127.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
2.6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-131.2 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
0.9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-131.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
0.89
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LI-140.2 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
1.37
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LI-140.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
1.33
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-141.2 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
1.86
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-141.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
1.64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-500SS1 0-1.5
18
-
-
-
10.2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-500SS2 1.5-3
36
-
-
-
1.03
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-500SS3 3-4.5
54
-
-
-
1.62
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Page 3 of 12
-------
Table C-10. Comparison of Individual Sample Results to Plant and Invertebrate NOECs
Sample ID
Sample
Depth
Bottom
COPEC3:
Uranium-
238
Uranium-
234
Thorium-
230
Radium-226 in
SE (Adjusted
Radium-226)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium13
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
Plant NOECc:
50
44
110
5.0
NSL
11
18
110
2.5
32
0.35
13
70
NSL
120
220
2
38
0.52
NSL
0.050
25
60
160
Soil Invertebrate
NOECc:
13,000
12,000
37,000
240
NSL
78
6.8
330
40
140
0.34
NSL
80
NSL
1,700
450
NSL
280
4.1
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
120
Units:
pCi/g
pCi/g
pCi/g
pCi/g
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
C1LI-500SS4 4.5-6
72
-
-
-
2.09
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-501 SS1 0-1.5
18
-
-
-
5.51
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-501 SS10
72
-
-
-
-
-
-
3.6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1.1 U
-
0.53 U
-
-
-
11
-
C1LI-501 SS2 1.5-3
36
-
-
-
14.3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-501 SS3 3-4.5
54
-
-
-
1.14
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LI-501 SS4 4.5-6
72
-
-
-
0.67
-
-
3.4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1 U
-
0.52 U
-
-
-
9.5
-
C1LP-004.2 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
62.6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-004.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
45.5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-009.2 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
13.5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-009.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
6.89
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-015.2 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
7.45
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-015.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
4.62
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-019.2 (12-18)
18
-
-
-
1.15
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-020.2 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
29.9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-020.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
29.2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-020.4 (48-54) Dup
54
-
-
-
30
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-026.2 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
22.5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-026.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
26.5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-031.2 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
3.05
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-031.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
2.14
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-037.2 (16-22)
22
-
-
-
2.11
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-042.2 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
2.02
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-042.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
1.65
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-048.2 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
1.74
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-048.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
1.31
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-052.2 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
1.54
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-052.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
1.81
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-053.2 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
1.99
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LP-053.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
2.14
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LP-059.2 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
2.04
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LP-059.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
2.1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LP-064.2 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
1.37
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LP-064.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
1.3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LP-070.2 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
1.9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LP-070.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
6.83
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LP-075.2 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
1.74
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LP-075.4 Dup
36
-
-
-
1.69
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-081.2 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
1.17
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-081.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
1.04
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-400SS1 0-1.5
18
-
-
-
2.15
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-400 SS2 1.5-3 Dup
36
-
-
-
31.3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LP-400 SS3 3-4.5
54
-
-
-
2.4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LP-400 SS4 4.5-6
72
-
-
-
2.04
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-401 SS1 0-1.5
18
-
-
-
8.2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-401 SS2 1.5-3
36
-
-
-
18.5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-401 SS3 3-4.5
54
-
-
-
30.7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-401 SS4 4.5-6
72
-
-
-
468
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-402 DUP 402
72
-
-
-
14.9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-402 SS1 0-1.5
18
-
-
-
2.2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LP-402 SS2 1.5-3
36
-
-
-
1.98
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LP-402 SS3 3-4.5 Dup
54
-
-
-
3.29
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LP-402 SS4 4.5-6
72
-
-
-
16.2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-403SS1 0-1.5
18
-
-
-
21.4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-403 SS2 1.5-3 Dup
36
-
-
-
27.6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-403 SS3 3-4.5
54
-
-
-
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LP-403 SS4 4.5-6
72
-
-
-
59.8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-404SS1 0-1.5
18
-
-
-
2.66
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-404 SS2 1.5-3 Dup
36
-
-
-
1.78
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-404 SS3 3-4.5
54
-
-
-
2.92
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LP-404 SS4 4.5-6 Dup
72
-
-
-
2.08
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-405 SS1 0-1.5
18
-
-
-
1.65
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-405 SS2 1.5-3
36
-
-
-
1.57
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-405 SS3 3-4.5
54
-
-
-
1.35
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-405 SS4 4.5-6
72
-
-
-
1.44
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-406 SS1 0-1.5 Dup
18
-
-
-
1.18
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-406 SS2 1.5-3
36
-
-
-
1.54
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Page 4 of 12
-------
Table C-10. Comparison of Individual Sample Results to Plant and Invertebrate NOECs
Sample ID
Sample
Depth
Bottom
COPEC3:
Uranium-
238
Uranium-
234
Thorium-
230
Radium-226 in
SE (Adjusted
Radium-226)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromiumb
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
Plant NOECc:
50
44
110
5.0
NSL
11
18
110
2.5
32
0.35
13
70
NSL
120
220
2
38
0.52
NSL
0.050
25
60
160
Soil Invertebrate
NOECc:
13,000
12,000
37,000
240
NSL
78
6.8
330
40
140
0.34
NSL
80
NSL
1,700
450
NSL
280
4.1
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
120
Units:
pCi/g
pCi/g
pCi/g
pCi/g
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
C1LP-406 SS3 3-4.5
54
-
-
-
1.62
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-406SS4 4.5-6
72
-
-
-
1.68
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-407 DUP 407
72
-
-
-
5.89
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-407 SS1 0-1.5
18
-
-
-
3.52
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-407 SS2 1.5-3
36
-
-
-
3.44
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-407 SS3 3-4.5
54
-
-
-
5.74
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-407 SS4 4.5-6
72
-
-
-
5.52
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-408 SS1 0-1.5
18
-
-
-
3.53
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-408 SS2 1.5-3
36
-
-
-
4.46
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-408 SS3 3-4.5
54
-
-
-
5.54
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-408 SS4 4.5-6
72
-
-
-
6.72
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-700 SS1 0-1.5
18
-
-
-
1.46
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-700 SS2 1.5-3 Dup
36
-
-
-
5.09
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-700 SS3 3-4.5
54
-
-
-
39.1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-700 SS4 4.5-6
72
-
-
-
34.8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-701 SS1 0-1.5
18
-
-
-
2.86
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-701 SS2 1.5-3
36
-
-
-
3.14
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-701 SS3 3-4.5
54
-
-
-
3.94
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-701 SS4 4.5-6
72
-
-
-
3.07
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-702 SS1 0-1.5
18
-
-
-
1.33
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-702 SS2 1.5-3
36
-
-
-
1.38
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-702 SS3 3-4.5
54
-
-
-
1.2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LP-702 SS4 4.5-6
72
-
-
-
1.54
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-703SS1 0-1.5
18
-
-
-
1.28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-703 SS2 1.5-3
36
-
-
-
1.14
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LP-703 SS3 3-4.5
54
-
-
-
1.13
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LP-703 SS4 4.5-6
72
-
-
-
1.2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LW-002.2 (6-12)
12
-
-
-
1.36
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LW-013.2 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
31.1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LW-013.4
36
-
-
-
38.7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LW-020.2 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
99
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LW-020.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
189
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LW-022.2 (12-18) Dup
18
-
-
-
55.3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LW-034.2 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
154
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LW-034.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
82
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LW-041.2 (12-18)
18
-
-
-
329
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LW-048.2 (12-18)
18
-
-
-
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LW-050.2 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
75.6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LW-050.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
60.6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LW-062.2 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
37.7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LW-062.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
48.8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LW-067.2 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
104
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LW-067.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
99
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LW-069.2 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
38.8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1 LW-069.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
67.4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LW-083.2 (8-14)
14
-
-
-
1.4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LW-090.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
56.9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LW-090.4 Dup
24
-
-
-
76.4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LW-097.2 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
1.82
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LW-097.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
2.25
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1LW-104.2 (14-20)
20
-
-
-
1.31
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1SS-026.3 (12-18)
18
-
-
-
7.3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1SS-041.3 (6-12)
12
-
-
-
2.05
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1SS-063A.3 (12-18)
18
-
-
-
1.6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1SS-082.3 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
0.93
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
RWPR-SS-029 (6-9)
9
-
-
-
1.07
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2.5
-
-
Frequency of Plant NOEC Exceedance:
0/0
0/0
0/0
58/161
0/0
0/0
0/2
0/0
0/0
0/0
0/0
0/0
0/0
0/0
0/0
0/0
0/2
0/0
0/2
0/0
0/0
0/1
0/2
0/0
Church Rock Mine No. 1 East - Surface Soil (0 - 6 inches bgs)
CELA-001 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
1.83
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-001 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.84
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-001 A. 1 (0-2")
2
-
-
-
1.60
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-004 (2-6) Dup
6
-
-
-
3.48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-004.1 (0-2")
2
-
-
-
2.46
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-008 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.53
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-008.1 (0-2")
2
-
-
-
1.31
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-012 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.47
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Page 5 of 12
-------
Table C-10. Comparison of Individual Sample Results to Plant and Invertebrate NOECs
Sample ID
Sample
Depth
Bottom
COPEC3:
Uranium-
238
Uranium-
234
Thorium-
230
Radium-226 in
SE (Adjusted
Radium-226)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromiumb
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
Plant NOECc:
50
44
110
5.0
NSL
11
18
110
2.5
32
0.35
13
70
NSL
120
220
2
38
0.52
NSL
0.050
25
60
160
Soil Invertebrate
NOECc:
13,000
12,000
37,000
240
NSL
78
6.8
330
40
140
0.34
NSL
80
NSL
1,700
450
NSL
280
4.1
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
120
Units:
pCi/g
pCi/g
pCi/g
pCi/g
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
CELA-012.1 (0-2")
2
-
-
-
2.24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-016 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
2.61
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-016.1 (0-2")
2
-
-
-
4.93
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-020 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.35
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-020.1 (0-2")
2
-
-
-
1.69
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-024 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.71
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-024.1 (0-2")
2
-
-
-
1.26
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-027 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
2.01
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-027.1 (0-2")
2
-
-
-
2.24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-031 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
2.63
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-031.1 (0-2")
2
-
-
-
2.34
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-035 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.63
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-035.1 (0-2")
2
-
-
-
1.96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-039 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
3.19
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-039.1 (0-2")
2
-
-
-
2.21
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-043 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
75.60
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-043.1 (0-2")
2
-
-
-
5.00
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-047 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
3.17
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-047.1 (0-2")
2
-
-
-
2.62
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-051 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
2.68
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-051.1 (0-2")
2
-
-
-
3.17
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-054 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.67
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-054.1 (0-2")
2
-
-
-
1.64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-058 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
3.08
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-058.1 (0-2")
2
-
-
-
37.80
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-062 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
2.14
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-062.1 (0-2") Dup
2
-
-
-
3.87
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-062.2
2
-
-
-
3.79
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-066 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-066.1 (0-2")
2
-
-
-
2.16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-070 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
19.00
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-070.1 (0-2")
2
-
-
-
4.25
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-070.2
2
-
-
-
7.70
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-074 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
7.40
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-074.1 (0-2")
2
-
-
-
5.95
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CESS-037 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CESS-037.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
2.24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CESS-041 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
86.30
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CESS-041.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
8.50
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CESS-060 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
4.34
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CESS-060.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
2.41
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CESS-069 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
2.27
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CESS-069.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
1.34
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CESS-070.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
1.60
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CR1E-SS05-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
1.59
6000
0.05
6.10
44.00
0.54
0.09
8.00
4.60
9.40
16000.00
10.00
120.00
0.36
9.80
1.40
0.06
0.20
1.00
12.00
46.00
CR1E-SS06-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
6.22
4700
0.04
4.50
68.00
0.42
0.05
8.50
4.50
7.70
12000.00
7.80
160.00
0.24
10.00
1.90
0.057 U
0.11
5.40
13.00
33.00
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-01
3
1.27
1.35
3.57
3.21
-
0.07
-
-
0.42
-
22.00
-
8.40
11000.00
7.00
-
0.21
20.00
1.30
-
0.10
-
14.00
32.00
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-02
3
-
-
-
-
4800
-
4.10
85.00
-
0.05
-
5.70
-
-
-
180.00
-
-
-
0.065 U
-
2.40
-
-
CR1E-SS08-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
1.76
5300
0.10
4.00
80.00
0.49
0.08
6.10
4.10
6.30
11000.00
8.10
140.00
0.24
5.70
1.20
0.058 U
0.10
2.60
14.00
40.00
CR1E-SS09-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
1.69
8000
0.06
8.00
72.00
0.66
0.09
8.50
6.90
13.00
21000.00
13.00
180.00
0.20
11.00
1.60
0.06
0.17
0.91
17.00
60.00
CR1E-SS10-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
1.67
8400
0.06
10.00
70.00
0.76
0.07
10.00
9.30
17.00
23000.00
16.00
190.00
0.23
13.00
1.80
0.08
0.20
1.00
18.00
65.00
CR1E-SS11-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
3.80
7400
0.09
6.50
86.00
0.62
0.14
10.00
6.40
14.00
17000.00
13.00
280.00
0.37
11.00
2.10
0.08
0.16
2.40
18.00
71.00
CR1E-SS12-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
1.59
7600
0.23
8.70
180.00
1.00
0.23
8.40
10.00
19.00
20000.00
18.00
290.00
0.40
13.00
3.10
0.09
0.22
1.90
23.00
80.00
CR1E-SS13-0000-0003-01
3
0.96
1.04
1.16
1.16
5100
0.10
5.70
100.00
0.72
0.15
5.10
6.80
12.00
12000.00
12.00
160.00
0.19
7.50
1.80
0.064 U
0.14
1.10
14.00
49.00
CR1E-SS14-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
1.50
4600
0.11
4.70
110.00
0.63
0.13
4.80
5.90
11.00
11000.00
11.00
160.00
0.25
7.40
5.00
0.058 U
0.13
5.30
13.00
47.00
CR1E-SS15-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
3.11
4600
0.13
4.80
420.00
0.65
0.14
5.70
6.10
11.00
11000.00
11.00
170.00
0.40
7.90
1.80
0.058 U
0.12
3.30
13.00
47.00
CR1E-SS16-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
4.58
4000
0.06
3.80
93.00
0.43
0.07
4.50
4.10
6.50
9700.00
7.50
140.00
0.19
5.30
2.50
0.059 U
0.08
3.30
12.00
36.00
CR1E-SS17-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
13.90
4600
0.10
4.90
78.00
0.56
0.12
5.50
5.90
9.80
12000.00
9.90
180.00
0.27
7.10
4.70
0.058 U
0.11
6.30
15.00
44.00
CR1E-SS18-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
1.81
4800
0.09
4.80
160.00
0.56
0.11
5.80
5.30
9.80
11000.00
9.70
180.00
0.21
7.20
1.60
0.059 U
0.11
1.40
13.00
45.00
CR1E-SS19-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
27.00
-
0.06
-
-
-
-
-
130.00
-
-
1.20
-
-
-
11.00
-
CR1E-SS19-0000-0003-02
3
-
-
-
1.39
4800
0.04
5.50
-
0.45
-
7.10
4.00
7.30
13000.00
8.30
-
0.38
8.00
-
0.059 U
0.16
0.87
-
36.00
Frequency of Plant NOEC Exceedance:
0/2
0/2
0/2
10/67
0/15
0/15
0/15
3/15
0/15
0/15
15/15
0/15
0/15
0/15
0/15
2/15
0/15
0/15
15/15
0/15
15/15
0/15
0/15
0/15
Frequency of Soil Invertebrate NOEC Exceedance:
0/2
0/2
0/2
0/67
0/15
0/15
3/15
1/15
0/15
0/15
15/15
0/15
0/15
0/15
0/15
0/15
0/15
0/15
2/15
0/15
0/15
0/15
0/15
0/15
Frequency of Plant and Soil Invertebrate Exceedance:
0/2
0/2
0/2
10/67
0/15
0/15
3/15
3/15
0/15
0/15
15/15
0/15
0/15
0/15
0/15
2/15
0/15
0/15
15/15
0/15
15/15
0/15
0/15
0/15
Page 6 of 12
-------
Table C-10. Comparison of Individual Sample Results to Plant and Invertebrate NOECs
Sample ID
Sample
Depth
Bottom
COPEC3:
Uranium-
238
Uranium-
234
Thorium-
230
Radium-226 in
SE (Adjusted
Radium-226)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromiumb
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
Plant NOECc:
50
44
110
5.0
NSL
11
18
110
2.5
32
0.35
13
70
NSL
120
220
2
38
0.52
NSL
0.050
25
60
160
Soil Invertebrate
NOECc:
13,000
12,000
37,000
240
NSL
78
6.8
330
40
140
0.34
NSL
80
NSL
1,700
450
NSL
280
4.1
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
120
Units:
pCi/g
pCi/g
pCi/g
pCi/g
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
Church Rock Mine No. 1 East - Subsurface Soil (6 - 72 inches bgs) d
C1E-1B002-5 (FD)
72
-
-
-
1.33
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1E-B001-5
72
-
-
-
0.674
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1E-B003-5
72
-
-
-
19.2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1E-B004-5
72
-
-
-
1.02
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1E-B005-5
72
-
-
-
50
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C1E-B006-5
72
-
-
-
0.932
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-001 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
1.34
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-001 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
1.49
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-004 (10-16)
16
-
-
-
1.65
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-008 DUP
18
-
-
-
3.56
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-012 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
1.18
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-012 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
1.13
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-016 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-016 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
74.2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-020 (6-12)
12
-
-
-
1.52
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-024 (14-20)
20
-
-
-
1.28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-027 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
112
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-027 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
81.3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-031 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
71.9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-031 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
151
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-035 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
352
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-035 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
103
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-039 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
194
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-039 (27-33)
33
-
-
-
429
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-043 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
363
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-043 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
35.8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-047 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
59.5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-047 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
123
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-051 (6-12)
12
-
-
-
89
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-054 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
83.3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-054 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
65.5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-058 DUP
24
-
-
-
261
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-062 (13-19)
19
-
-
-
3.7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-066 (12-18)
18
-
-
-
45.3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-070 (9-15)
15
-
-
-
2.67
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELA-074 (9-14)
14
-
-
-
3.67
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELI-502 DUP 502
54
-
-
-
90
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELI-502 SS1 0-1.5
18
-
-
-
25.5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELI-502 SS2 1.5-3 Dup
24
-
-
-
232
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELI-502 SS3 3-4.5
54
-
-
-
97
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1.1 U
-
0.53 U
-
-
210
11
-
CELI-502 SS4 4.5-6
72
-
-
-
8.1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELI-502 SS9
54
-
-
-
-
-
-
2.8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1.8
-
23
-
-
-
28
-
CELI-503 SS1 0-1.5
18
-
-
-
14.5
-
-
6.2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1.1 U
-
2.7 U
-
-
73
18
-
CELI-503 SS2 1.5-3
36
-
-
-
1.24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELI-503 SS3 3-4.5
54
-
-
-
1.03
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELI-503 SS4 4.5-6
72
-
-
-
1.22
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELI-503 SS5
18
-
-
-
-
-
-
7.2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1.3 U
-
3.2 U
-
-
-
21
-
CELP-409 SS1 0-1.5
18
-
-
-
2.57
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELP-409 SS2 1.5-3
36
-
-
-
2.05
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELP-409 SS3 3-4.5
54
-
-
-
1.6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CELP-409 SS4 4.5-6
72
-
-
-
2.14
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CESS-037 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
1.2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CESS-037 (24-30)
30
-
-
-
1.15
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CESS-041 (6-12)
12
-
-
-
16.9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CESS-060 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
1.65
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CESS-060 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
2.39
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CESS-069 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
3.79
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CESS-069 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
2.9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Frequency of Plant NOEC Exceedance:
0/0
0/0
0/0
28/56
0/0
0/0
0/4
0/0
0/0
0/0
0/0
0/0
0/0
0/0
0/0
0/0
0/4
0/0
1/4
0/0
0/0
2/2
0/4
0/0
Page 7 of 12
-------
Table C-10. Comparison of Individual Sample Results to Plant and Invertebrate NOECs
Sample ID
Sample
Depth
Bottom
COPECa:
Uranium-
238
Uranium-
234
Thorium-
230
Radium-226 in
SE (Adjusted
Radium-226)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromiumb
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
Plant NOEC0:
50
44
110
5.0
NSL
11
18
110
2.5
32
0.35
13
70
NSL
120
220
2
38
0.52
NSL
0.050
25
60
160
Soil Invertebrate
NOEC0:
13,000
12,000
37,000
240
NSL
78
6.8
330
40
140
0.34
NSL
80
NSL
1,700
450
NSL
280
4.1
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
120
Units:
pCi/g
pCi/g
pCi/g
pCi/g
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
Kerr-McGee Ponds on the Navajo Nation - Surface Soil (0 - 6 inches bgs)
KMP-13-00
2
-
-
-
2.15
-
-
5.30
66.00
-
0.08
7.10
-
-
-
8.60
-
0.50
-
1.80
0.5 U
-
0.87
15.00
-
KMP-14-00
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.14
-
-
-
-
11.00
-
0.55
-
-
0.49 U
-
-
17.00
-
KMP-14D-00
2
-
-
-
8.21
-
-
5.60
78.00
-
-
8.20
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2.90
-
-
1.30
-
-
KMP-SB44-0000-0006-01
6
-
-
-
9.30
6500
0.13
5.60
82.00
0.57
0.16
7.00
5.10
11.00
14000.00
13.00
230.00
0.42
7.90
2.40
0.062 U
0.15
6.20
15.00
44.00
KMP-SS49-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
4.00
-
0.09
-
-
-
0.09
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.36
-
-
-
-
1.40
-
-
KMP-SS49-0000-0003-02
3
-
-
-
-
6900
-
5.90
75.00
0.56
7.80
5.20
9.30
15000.00
11.00
220.00
-
8.40
1.90
0.059 U
0.15
-
16.00
45.00
KMP-SS74-0000-0003-01
3
1.13
0.97
2.04
2.80
5600
0.05
4.90
56.00
0.50
0.08
6.00
4.10
7.40
12000.00
9.30
190.00
0.35
6.80
1.40
0.059 U
0.12
0.94
12.00
36.00
Frequency of Plant NOEC Exceedance:
0/1
0/1
0/1
2/5
0/3
0/3
0/5
0/5
0/3
0/6
5/5
0/3
0/3
0/3
0/5
1/3
0/5
0/3
5/5
0/5
3/3
0/5
0/5
0/3
Frequency of Soil Invertebrate NOEC Exceedance:
0/1
0/1
0/1
0/5
0/3
0/3
0/5
0/5
0/3
0/6
5/5
0/3
0/3
0/3
0/5
0/3
0/5
0/3
0/5
0/5
0/3
0/5
0/5
0/3
Frequency of Plant and Soil Invertebrate Exceedance:
0/1
0/1
0/1
2/5
0/3
0/3
0/5
0/5
0/3
0/6
5/5
0/3
0/3
0/3
0/5
1/3
0/5
0/3
5/5
0/5
3/3
0/5
0/5
0/3
Kerr-McGee Ponds on the Navajo Nation - Subsurface Soil (6 - 72 inches bgs)d
KMP-SB43-0018-0024-01
24
-
-
-
2.13
6800
0.093
5.9
56
0.57
0.073
7.4
5.1
9
15000
10
210
0.37
7.8
1.3
0.06 U
0.14
3.8
14
41
KMP-SB45-0060-0066-01
66
-
-
-
1.46
6700
0.088
5.7
74
0.55
0.06
7
5.1
8.1
14000
9.5
220
0.36
7.7
1.2
0.06 U
0.14
0.64
14
39
Frequency of Plant NOEC Exceedance:
0/0
0/0
0/0
0/2
0/2
0/2
0/2
0/2
0/2
0/2
2/2
0/2
0/2
0/2
0/2
0/2
0/2
0/2
2/2
0/2
2/2
0/2
0/2
0/2
Kerr-McGee Ponds on United Nuclear Corporation Property - Surface Soil (0 - 6 inches bgs)
KMP-01 -00
2
-
-
-
3.06
-
-
6.90
87.00
-
0.12
8.70
-
-
-
12.00
-
0.69
-
2.70
0.53 U
-
2.60
21.00
-
KMP-02-00
2
-
-
-
1.41
-
-
5.20
140.00
-
0.12 U
7.10
-
-
-
8.30
-
0.52
-
1.60
0.5 U
-
9.70
16.00
-
KMP-03-00
2
-
-
-
8.32
-
-
4.50
55.00
-
0.08
6.60
-
-
-
8.60
-
1.3 U
-
3.10
0.53 U
-
3.50
16.00
-
KMP-04-00
2
-
-
-
2.67
-
-
7.00
90.00
-
0.12
9.50
-
-
-
13.00
-
0.57
-
1.80
0.21 U
-
1.30
21.00
-
KMP-05-00
2
-
-
-
2.92
-
-
4.70
50.00
-
0.07
7.30
-
-
-
8.50
-
1.3 U
-
1.80
0.52 U
-
1.40
17.00
-
KMP-06-00
2
-
-
-
2.22
-
-
4.50
51.00
-
0.12 U
6.90
-
-
-
7.70
-
0.52
-
2.00
0.49 U
-
2.80
16.00
-
KMP-07-00
2
-
-
-
6.45
-
-
9.20
100.00
-
0.14
12.00
-
-
-
17.00
-
0.65
-
3.30
0.58 U
-
2.90
26.00
-
KMP-08-00
2
-
-
-
5.36
-
-
4.80
55.00
-
0.07
6.80
-
-
-
10.00
-
1.2 U
-
2.60
0.49 U
-
2.10
17.00
-
KMP-09-00
2
-
-
-
7.42
-
-
5.30
65.00
-
0.09
8.30
-
-
-
9.90
-
0.93
-
5.00
0.56 U
-
13.00
22.00
-
KM P-10-00
2
-
-
-
7.77
-
-
5.20
92.00
-
0.10
6.90
-
-
-
8.90
-
0.51
-
3.60
0.51 U
-
4.20
18.00
-
KM P-15-00
2
-
-
-
22.84
-
-
5.00
73.00
-
0.13
7.80
-
-
-
11.00
-
0.65
-
6.60
0.51 U
-
13.00
23.00
-
KM P-16-00
2
-
-
-
6.67
-
-
-
89.00
-
-
9.90
-
-
-
14.00
-
-
-
3.80
-
-
3.60
-
-
KMP-16D-00
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
7.50
-
-
0.14
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.75
-
-
0.52 U
-
-
22.00
-
KMP-17-00
2
-
-
-
48.54
-
-
7.60
120.00
-
0.14
8.50
-
-
-
13.00
-
0.65
-
21.00
0.45 U
-
40.00
41.00
-
KM P-18-00
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
6.60
90.00
-
0.15
10.00
-
-
-
14.00
-
0.74
-
5.60
0.49 U
-
-
25.00
-
KMP-18D-00
2
-
-
-
16.44
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
13.00
-
-
KMP-19-00
2
-
-
-
26.04
-
-
5.30
74.00
-
0.08
7.20
-
-
-
10.00
-
0.70
-
8.80
0.46 U
-
18.00
26.00
-
KMP-20-00
2
-
-
-
13.70
-
-
5.70
74.00
-
0.10
8.00
-
-
-
11.00
-
0.61
-
6.20
0.5 U
-
12.00
22.00
-
KMP-21-00
2
-
-
-
4.43
-
-
4.90
52.00
-
0.06
7.00
-
-
-
8.70
-
0.54
-
2.50
0.45 U
-
4.80
17.00
-
KMP-22-00
2
-
-
-
4.35
-
-
4.90
51.00
-
0.12 U
7.00
-
-
-
8.10
-
1.2 U
-
2.00
0.48 U
-
3.50
16.00
-
KMP-23-00
2
-
-
-
3.73
-
-
6.00
63.00
-
0.11
7.60
-
-
-
9.60
-
0.80
-
1.90
0.51 U
-
2.80
18.00
-
KM P-S B27-0000-0006-01
6
1.17
1.11
0.94
1.27
7000
0.08
5.90
81.00
0.60
0.07
8.10
5.00
9.30
15000.00
10.00
200.00
0.41
8.70
1.30
0.059 U
0.17
1.50
14.00
40.00
KMP-SS45-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
1.14
4000
0.10
4.30
110.00
0.46
0.12
9.60
4.70
9.00
9300.00
8.10
-
0.24
11.00
0.97
0.057 U
0.10
0.99
11.00
33.00
KMP-SS45-0000-0003-02
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
KM P-SS46-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
2.46
4900
0.04
4.10
75.00
0.41
0.08
5.90
4.00
7.20
11000.00
7.40
180.00
0.26
7.00
1.20
0.057 U
0.10
1.70
12.00
32.00
KMP-SS47-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
1.54
5100
0.05
4.40
63.00
0.44
0.08
5.80
4.20
6.40
12000.00
7.90
190.00
0.25
6.30
1.10
0.058 U
0.10
0.83
13.00
34.00
KM P-SS48-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
24.60
6000
0.09
5.30
52.00
0.49
0.09
6.70
4.40
7.70
13000.00
9.50
200.00
0.45
7.00
6.30
0.057 U
0.13
13.00
16.00
39.00
KM P-SS50-0000-0003-01
3
1.92
2.43
3.41
4.41
6300
0.05
5.40
58.00
0.54
0.09
6.90
4.60
8.00
14000.00
10.00
200.00
0.34
7.40
2.40
0.058 U
0.13
4.00
14.00
40.00
KMP-SS51 -0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
1.66
6500
0.07
5.60
62.00
0.54
0.11
7.30
5.10
8.90
14000.00
11.00
210.00
0.29
7.80
1.40
0.057 U
0.13
1.20
14.00
43.00
KM P-SS52-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
2.47
6100
0.06
5.10
51.00
0.50
0.05
6.70
4.60
7.00
14000.00
8.50
180.00
0.37
7.20
1.30
0.057 U
0.12
3.30
13.00
37.00
KM P-SS53-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
0.89
5000
0.06
4.30
46.00
0.42
0.05
5.50
4.00
5.30
12000.00
7.20
180.00
0.28
5.90
0.99
0.057 U
0.09
0.61
13.00
31.00
KM P-SS54-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
7.60
7100
0.11
6.70
85.00
0.63
0.12
8.70
6.00
13.00
17000.00
12.00
230.00
0.44
10.00
1.90
0.06
0.15
2.20
16.00
51.00
KMP-SS55-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
8.30
8300
0.15
7.50
97.00
0.73
0.13
9.30
6.70
15.00
19000.00
15.00
270.00
0.55
11.00
2.80
0.09
0.18
5.90
19.00
59.00
KMP-SS56-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
6.57
5900
0.07
5.00
52.00
0.49
0.07
6.50
4.10
7.40
13000.00
9.10
200.00
0.46
6.70
2.20
0.058 U
0.12
5.10
14.00
38.00
KMP-SS57-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
12.00
7100
0.10
6.10
65.00
0.59
0.11
8.10
5.40
10.00
16000.00
12.00
210.00
0.58
8.40
3.30
0.058 U
0.14
5.90
17.00
48.00
KMP-SS58-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
7.80
6700
0.11
5.40
64.00
0.54
0.13
7.40
4.80
9.30
14000.00
11.00
220.00
0.38
7.40
2.50
0.057 U
0.12
2.60
15.00
43.00
KMP-SS59-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
12.00
7000
0.09
6.00
70.00
0.58
0.09
7.70
5.30
9.50
16000.00
11.00
220.00
0.46
8.30
3.50
0.057 U
0.14
19.00
17.00
47.00
KMP-SS60-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
8.80
6000
0.11
6.00
66.00
0.49
0.08
6.70
4.90
9.20
14000.00
10.00
190.00
0.61
7.70
3.00
0.058 U
0.12
5.60
15.00
43.00
KMP-SS61 -0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
11.50
6300
0.10
5.40
70.00
0.52
0.11
7.10
4.60
8.80
14000.00
11.00
200.00
0.35
7.40
3.90
0.057 U
0.12
8.50
16.00
41.00
KMP-SS62-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
2.67
6300
0.10
5.10
59.00
0.51
0.09
7.00
4.40
7.90
14000.00
9.30
200.00
0.31
6.90
1.50
0.058 U
0.11
3.20
14.00
39.00
KMP-SS63-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
3.17
5900
0.07
4.80
50.00
0.50
0.08
6.60
4.30
7.10
13000.00
8.60
190.00
0.60
6.90
1.70
0.057 U
0.11
4.70
13.00
39.00
KMP-SS64-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
4.23
6100
0.09
5.00
52.00
0.50
0.07
6.90
4.50
7.70
14000.00
9.10
180.00
0.56
7.10
1.70
0.057 U
0.12
5.70
14.00
39.00
KMP-SS65-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
6.93
6100
0.08
5.20
57.00
0.49
0.08
6.90
4.60
8.20
14000.00
9.90
210.00
0.33
7.20
2.10
0.058 U
0.12
4.30
15.00
40.00
KMP-SS66-0000-0003-01
3
2.43
2.23
2.14
2.95
5800
0.06
4.80
49.00
0.47
0.06
6.20
4.20
6.50
13000.00
8.30
180.00
0.32
6.30
1.40
0.058 U
0.10
4.60
13.00
36.00
KMP-SS67-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
6.08
6900
0.08
6.20
99.00
0.56
0.10
7.90
5.50
11.00
16000.00
12.00
230.00
0.36
8.70
2.00
0.058 U
0.14
3.40
16.00
48.00
KMP-SS68-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
4.10
7500
0.07
6.90
91.00
0.60
0.08
8.30
6.00
11.00
17000.00
12.00
220.00
0.30
9.40
2.00
0.058 U
0.14
3.10
16.00
47.00
KMP-SS69-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
4.10
7500
0.07
6.50
74.00
0.62
0.13
8.40
5.70
11.00
17000.00
12.00
230.00
0.42
9.10
1.70
0.06
0.15
0.94
16.00
51.00
KMP-SS70-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
-
6400
0.05
6.10
59.00
0.51
0.07
7.10
5.30
9.20
15000.00
10.00
170.00
0.27
8.20
1.20
0.058 U
0.12
0.72
14.00
43.00
KMP-SS70-0000-0003-02
3
-
-
-
1.53
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Page 8 of 12
-------
Table C-10. Comparison of Individual Sample Results to Plant and Invertebrate NOECs
Sample ID
Sample
Depth
Bottom
COPECa:
Uranium-
238
Uranium-
234
Thorium-
230
Radium-226 in
SE (Adjusted
Radium-226)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromiumb
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
Plant NOEC0:
50
44
110
5.0
NSL
11
18
110
2.5
32
0.35
13
70
NSL
120
220
2
38
0.52
NSL
0.050
25
60
160
Soil Invertebrate
NOEC0:
13,000
12,000
37,000
240
NSL
78
6.8
330
40
140
0.34
NSL
80
NSL
1,700
450
NSL
280
4.1
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
120
Units:
pCi/g
pCi/g
pCi/g
pCi/g
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
KMP-SS71 -0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
12.90
6100
0.06
5.60
64.00
0.48
0.11
7.00
4.70
8.80
14000.00
11.00
200.00
0.41
7.50
2.90
0.057 U
0.12
1.40
15.00
43.00
KMP-SS72-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
2.09
6400
0.07
5.90
60.00
0.52
0.08
7.20
5.20
9.60
15000.00
10.00
200.00
0.30
8.10
1.30
0.058 U
0.12
0.70
14.00
47.00
KMP-SS73-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
4.90
6800
0.08
6.70
92.00
0.59
0.13
8.10
5.90
13.00
16000.00
13.00
230.00
0.42
9.60
1.90
0.07
0.14
1.20
16.00
53.00
KMP-SS75-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
68.10
5700
0.19
6.70
170.00
0.48
0.14
10.00
4.90
16.00
17000.00
37.00
240.00
1.40
9.10
9.10
0.058 U
0.14
19.00
36.00
95.00
KMP-SS75-0000-0003-02
3
-
-
-
57.90
5800
0.26
7.00
160.00
0.49
0.16
24.00
5.30
18.00
19000.00
130.00
230.00
1.60
9.40
7.80
0.058 U
0.15
25.00
33.00
90.00
KMP-SS76-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
6.17
7600
0.09
6.80
62.00
0.63
0.12
8.80
5.50
12.00
17000.00
14.00
230.00
0.45
9.50
2.20
0.07
0.18
1.30
16.00
53.00
KMP-SS77-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
5.82
7000
0.11
6.50
170.00
0.60
0.19
8.40
5.70
14.00
16000.00
16.00
310.00
0.46
9.30
2.00
0.07
0.16
1.40
16.00
55.00
KMP-SS78-0000-0003-01
3
1.01
0.93
2.19
2.97
5400
0.06
5.40
38.00
0.47
0.07
6.40
5.10
7.30
14000.00
9.20
210.00
0.40
7.50
1.20
0.058 U
0.15
0.72
12.00
39.00
KMP-SS79-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
7.30
6200
0.08
5.00
67.00
0.49
0.12
6.70
4.60
8.70
13000.00
11.00
230.00
0.33
7.10
2.20
0.058 U
0.11
4.50
14.00
39.00
Frequency of Plant NOEC Exceedance:
0/4
0/4
0/4
28/54
0/35
0/35
0/54
5/54
0/35
0/54
54/54
0/35
0/35
0/35
1/54
10/34
0/54
0/35
54/54
0/54
35/35
1/54
0/54
0/35
Frequency of Soil Invertebrate NOEC Exceedance:
0/4
0/4
0/4
0/54
0/35
0/35
8/54
0/54
0/35
0/54
54/54
0/35
0/35
0/35
0/54
0/34
0/54
0/35
9/54
0/54
0/35
0/54
0/54
0/35
Frequency of Plant and Soil Invertebrate Exceedance:
0/4
0/4
0/4
28/54
0/35
0/35
8/54
5/54
0/35
0/54
54/54
0/35
0/35
0/35
1/54
10/34
0/54
0/35
54/54
0/54
35/35
1/54
0/54
0/35
Kerr-McGee Ponds on United Nuclear Corporation Property - Subsurface Soil (6 - 72 inches bgs)d
KMP-16-18
24
-
-
-
143.1
-
-
5.1
190
-
0.11
8.1
-
-
-
11
-
1.4
-
37
0.52 U
-
110
58
-
KMP-16-36
42
-
-
-
1.7
-
-
5
51
-
0.12 U
7.5
-
-
-
8.3
-
0.63
-
1.4
0.48 U
-
37
16
-
KMP-17-18
24
-
-
-
8.3
-
-
4.9
55
-
0.12 U
7
-
-
-
7.6
-
0.64
-
3
0.46 U
-
130
17
-
KMP-17-36
42
-
-
-
3.4
-
-
4.7
43
-
0.12 U
6.9
-
-
-
7.3
-
0.58
-
2.3
0.47 U
-
58
16
-
KMP-18-18
24
-
-
-
1.9
-
-
4.5
43
-
0.11 U
7
-
-
-
7.2
-
0.75
-
1.4
0.45 U
-
24
16
-
KMP-18-36
42
-
-
-
1.3
-
-
4.7
43
-
0.13 U
7.7
-
-
-
8
-
0.65
-
1.7
0.5 U
-
38
16
-
KMP-19-18
24
-
-
-
3.1
-
-
5
62
-
0.13 U
7.7
-
-
-
9.1
-
0.79
-
3.3
0.53 U
-
60
18
-
KMP-19-36
42
-
-
-
1.7
-
-
5.3
55
-
0.13 U
7.4
-
-
-
7
-
0.67
-
2
0.5 U
-
32
17
-
KMP-20-18
24
-
-
-
2.3
-
-
4.2
74
-
0.13 U
8.6
-
-
-
6.7
-
0.69
-
1.6
0.5 U
-
22
17
-
KMP-20-36
42
-
-
-
1.3
-
-
7.5
69
-
0.076
7.4
-
-
-
12
-
1.1
-
1.5
0.5 U
-
32
17
-
KMP-21-18
24
-
-
-
3.2
-
-
4
41
-
0.076
5.9
-
-
-
6.4
-
0.76
-
1.6
0.46 U
-
35
13
-
KMP-21-36
42
-
-
-
1.6
-
-
5.3
57
-
0.067
8
-
-
-
8.9
-
0.75
-
2.1
0.5 U
-
22
17
-
KMP-22-18
24
-
-
-
1.1
-
-
5.3
47
-
0.062
7.8
-
-
-
8.5
-
0.51
-
1.7
0.19
-
4.3
16
-
KMP-22-36
42
-
-
-
0.9
-
-
4
40
-
0.12 U
5.8
-
-
-
6.4
-
1.2 U
-
1.4
0.5 U
-
0.77
13
-
KMP-23-18
24
-
-
-
1.3
-
-
4.9
51
-
0.077
7.8
-
-
-
7.9
-
1
-
1.3
0.51 U
-
44
16
-
KMP-23-36
42
-
-
-
1.3
-
-
4.9
54
-
0.13 U
8.2
-
-
-
8.2
-
1.3
-
1.5
0.52 U
-
52
16
-
KMP-SB24-0018-0024-01
24
-
-
-
0.98
6900
0.1
7
60
0.6
0.094
7.6
5.9
11
16000
12
220
0.4
9
1.4
0.066 U
0.15
2.2
15
46
KMP-SB24-0048-0054-01
54
1.22
1.33
1.22
1.56
9600
0.11
8.5
110
0.85
0.1
11
7.9
14
22000
15
300
0.53
12
1.8
0.11
0.21
1.1
20
60
KMP-SB25-0006-0012-01
12
-
-
-
1.81
5500
0.058
4.7
47
0.47
0.045
6.1
4.4
6.6
12000
7.7
180
0.67
6.5
1.5
0.06 U
0.11
23
13
32
KMP-SB25-0018-0024-01
24
-
-
-
0.92
6000
0.064
5.1
44
0.51
0.054
6.6
4.7
7.4
13000
8.2
190
0.47
6.9
1.1
0.062 U
0.12
60
13
35
KMP-SB26-0006-0012-01
12
1.33
1.06
1.13
1.16
8300
0.14
6.8
110
0.67
0.14
8.7
6
12
16000
13
270
0.48
9.7
1.5
0.067
0.17
5.9
17
48
KMP-SB26-0012-0018-01
18
-
-
-
-
-
0.11
6.5
-
0.63
0.12
8.4
5.7
11
16000
12
-
0.43
9.4
1.3
-
0.18
1.8
-
-
KMP-SB26-0012-0018-02
18
-
-
-
1.83
7700
-
-
90
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
250
-
-
-
0.066
-
-
16
46
KMP-SB27-0012-0018-01
18
-
-
-
1.17
8200
0.091
6.7
92
0.68
0.08
9
5.8
11
16000
11
230
0.41
9.7
1.5
0.069
0.18
0.8
16
46
KMP-SB28-0036-0042-01
42
-
-
-
0.93
5600
0.063
4.9
45
0.47
0.053
6.1
4.4
6.7
12000
7.9
170
1.7
6.5
1.1
0.061 U
0.11
180
12
32
KMP-SB28-0042-0048-01
48
-
-
-
0.93
6400
0.065
5.4
57
0.53
0.064
6.8
4.7
7.4
14000
8.6
200
1.4
7.3
1.1
0.061 U
0.13
190
13
36
KMP-SB28-0060-0066-01
66
51.5
49.4
1.1
-
5900
0.063
6.3
50
0.52
0.051
6.5
5.2
7.1
14000
00
00
190
-
7.2
1.2
0.06 U
0.13
160
13
35
KMP-SB28-0060-0066-02
66
-
-
-
0.95
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.38
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
KMP-SB29-0048-0054-01
54
-
-
-
0.82
-
0.063
-
60
-
-
5.6
4.1
-
-
-
-
0.39
-
1.1
0.059 U
0.1
0.59
13
31
KMP-SB29-0048-0054-02
54
-
-
-
-
5300
-
5
-
0.43
0.048
-
-
5.6
14000
7.4
310
-
6.1
-
-
-
-
-
-
KMP-SB30-0030-0036-01
36
-
-
-
0.78
5600
0.058
4.9
43
0.48
0.047
6.1
5.2
6.4
12000
7.9
170
1.2
6.6
2.9
0.058 U
0.12
0.86
12
32
KMP-SB31 -0060-0066-01
66
-
-
-
1.43
6900
0.057
6.3
59
0.61
0.061
7.8
5.7
9.8
16000
11
200
0.36
00
00
1.4
0.061
0.17
0.8
14
44
KMP-SB32-0060-0066-01
66
-
-
-
2.09
5500
0.049
5
46
0.46
0.051
8.2
4.3
7.2
12000
8.1
180
0.91
6.6
1.6
0.059 U
0.12
14
13
33
KMP-SB33-0054-0060-01
60
-
-
-
0.7
5600
0.043
5.1
44
0.47
0.05
6
4.5
6.8
13000
7.8
190
0.3
6.7
1.1
0.059 U
0.12
0.66
12
33
KMP-SB33-0060-0066-01
66
-
-
-
1.02
5000
0.042
4.6
35
0.43
0.044
7.7
4.3
6.6
12000
7.2
190
0.81
6.3
0.99
0.058 U
0.1
1.9
12
38
KMP-SB33-0066-0072-01
72
-
-
-
4.55
5500
0.046
4.9
47
0.44
0.052
6.6
4.3
7.2
12000
8.4
180
0.41
6.4
1.7
0.057 U
0.11
4
13
36
KMP-SB34-0048-0054-01
54
-
-
-
3.57
5400
0.05
4.8
41
0.45
0.05
6
4.3
6.9
12000
8.1
170
0.44
6.3
1.5
0.059 U
0.12
20
12
34
KMP-SB35-0006-0012-01
12
-
-
-
27.1
5400
0.1
5.3
65
0.44
0.11
5.8
4.2
7.6
12000
9.7
230
0.62
6.1
6.4
0.057 U
0.1
30
17
36
KMP-SB36-0030-0036-01
36
-
-
-
30.7
6100
0.074
5.5
51
0.5
0.065
6.7
4.7
8
13000
8.9
220
0.58
7.1
2.4
0.056 U
0.12
24
14
38
KMP-SB37-0066-0072-01
72
-
-
-
8.7
7000
0.099
6.2
58
0.57
0.07
7.5
5.4
9.5
15000
10
200
0.39
8.2
2
0.058 U
0.15
7.1
15
42
KMP-SB38-0006-0012-01
12
-
-
-
1.4
7200
0.11
6
69
0.55
0.094
7.5
5.9
9.8
16000
11
250
0.5
8.9
1.3
0.063 U
0.13
1.4
16
44
KMP-SB38-0036-0042-01
42
0.89
1.0
0.97
1.14
7900
0.11
6.8
83
0.6
0.079
8.6
6.3
11
17000
11
230
0.33
9.4
1.3
0.059 U
0.15
0.63
16
48
KMP-SB40-0054-0060-01
60
-
-
-
1.19
6400
0.07
5.1
55
0.51
0.06
6.6
4.5
7.2
13000
8
190
0.32
6.8
1.3
0.059 U
0.12
28
13
34
KMP-SB41 -0054-0060-01
60
-
-
-
1.48
7600
0.087
6
90
0.61
0.063
8
5.5
9.6
15000
10
240
0.41
8.6
1.3
0.061 U
0.16
0.76
15
43
KMP-SB42-0054-0060-01
60
-
-
-
1.05
7900
0.099
6.4
86
0.69
0.081
8.5
6.2
11
17000
11
240
0.39
9.3
1.4
0.061 U
0.17
1
17
47
Frequency of Plant NOEC Exceedance:
1/4
1/4
0/4
5/42
0/26
0/26
0/42
1/42
0/26
0/42
42/42
0/26
0/26
0/26
0/42
10/26
0/42
0/26
42/42
0/42
26/26
17/42
0/42
0/26
Page 9 of 12
-------
Table C-10. Comparison of Individual Sample Results to Plant and Invertebrate NOECs
Sample ID
Sample
Depth
Bottom
COPECa:
Uranium-
238
Uranium-
234
Thorium-
230
Radium-226 in
SE (Adjusted
Radium-226)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium15
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
Plant NOECc:
50
44
110
5.0
NSL
11
18
110
2.5
32
0.35
13
70
NSL
120
220
2
38
0.52
NSL
0.050
25
60
160
Soil Invertebrate
NOECc:
13,000
12,000
37,000
240
NSL
78
6.8
330
40
140
0.34
NSL
80
NSL
1,700
450
NSL
280
4.1
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
120
Units:
pCi/g
pCi/g
pCi/g
pCi/g
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
Arroyos on Navajo Nation - Surface Soil (0 - 6 inches bgs)
CRPA-004.2 (2-6)
6
--
--
--
1.37
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
CRPA-005.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
1.10
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRPA-005.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.76
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRPA-006.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
1.84
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRPA-007.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
1.20
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRPA-007.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.43
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRPA-008.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
1.08
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRPA-009.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
1.20
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRPA-009.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.42
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRPA-010.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
1.23
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRPA-010.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.60
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRPA-011.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
0.92
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRPA-011.4
2
-
-
-
1.36
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRPA-012.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
1.29
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRPA-012.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.31
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRPA-013.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
1.22
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRPA-013.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.12
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRPA-014.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
1.79
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRPA-014.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.81
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRPA-U1.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
1.69
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRPA-U1.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.46
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-001.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
0.99
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-001.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.12
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-002.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
0.78
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-002.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
0.85
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-003.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
1.23
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-003.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.55
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-004.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.00
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-004.4
2
-
-
-
1.20
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-005.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
0.73
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-005.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
0.71
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-006.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
0.80
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-006.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
0.41
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-007.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
1.42
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-007.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.54
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-008.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
1.32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-008.4
6
-
-
-
1.96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-009.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
0.70
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-009.2 (2-4)
4
-
-
-
1.13
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-010.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
1.51
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-010.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.82
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-011.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
1.11
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-011.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.52
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-012.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
0.73
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-012.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.23
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-013.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
1.38
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-014.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
1.05
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-015.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
1.19
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-015.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.33
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-016.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
0.80
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-017.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
1.38
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-017.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
0.93
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-018.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
1.27
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-018.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
2.32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-019.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
0.94
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-020.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
3.05
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-020.4
2
-
-
-
1.35
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-021.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
0.93
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-021.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
2.02
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-022.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
0.76
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-023.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
0.74
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-023.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.51
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-024.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
0.92
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-024.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.47
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-025.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
0.49
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Page 10 of 12
-------
Table C-10. Comparison of Individual Sample Results to Plant and Invertebrate NOECs
Sample ID
Sample
Depth
Bottom
COPEC":
Uranium-
238
Uranium-
234
Thorium-
230
Radium-226 in
SE (Adjusted
Radium-226)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium15
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
Plant NOEC":
50
44
110
5.0
NSL
11
18
110
2.5
32
0.35
13
70
NSL
120
220
2
38
0.52
NSL
0.050
25
60
160
Soil Invertebrate
NOEC":
13,000
12,000
37,000
240
NSL
78
6.8
330
40
140
0.34
NSL
80
NSL
1,700
450
NSL
280
4.1
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
120
Units:
pCi/g
pCi/g
pCi/g
pCi/g
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
CRUA-026.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
0.75
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-026.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.56
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-027.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
1.06
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-027.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.15
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-028.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
0.68
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-028.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.01
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-029.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
1.57
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-029.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.53
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-030.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
0.93
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-030.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.63
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-031.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.47
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-031.4
2
-
-
-
1.55
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-032.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
1.67
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-032.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.52
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-033.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
1.54
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-033.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.61
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-034.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
0.98
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-034.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.38
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-035.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
1.14
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-035.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.12
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-036.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
0.89
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-036.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
0.66
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
KMA-SS02-0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
0.86
4700
0.04
4.40
59.00
0.38
0.05
4.00
5.10
12000.00
7.30
200.00
0.24
5.50
1.00
0.058 U
0.09
0.59
12.00
31.00
KMP-11-00
2
-
-
-
0.84
-
-
7.6
74.00
-
0.06
-
-
-
9.10
-
0.62
-
1.10
0.47 U
-
0.64
16.00
-
KM P-12-00
2
-
-
-
0.94
-
-
11
59.00
-
0.06
-
-
-
9.00
-
0.81
-
1.50
0.47 U
-
0.69
25.00
-
Frequency of Plant NOEC Exceedance:
0/0
0/0
0/0
0/90
0/1
0/1
0/3
0/3
0/1
0/3
3/3
0/1
0/1
0/1
0/3
0/1
0/3
0/1
3/3
0/3
1/1
0/3
0/3
0/1
Frequency of Soil Invertebrate NOEC Exceedance:
0/0
0/0
0/0
0/90
0/1
0/1
2/3
0/3
0/1
0/3
3/3
0/1
0/1
0/1
0/3
0/1
0/3
0/1
0/3
0/3
0/1
0/3
0/3
0/1
Frequency of Plant and Soil Invertebrate Exceedance:
0/0
0/0
0/0
0/90
0/1
0/1
2/3
0/3
0/1
0/3
3/3
0/1
0/1
0/1
0/3
0/1
0/3
0/1
3/3
0/3
1/1
0/3
0/3
0/1
Arroyos on Navajo Nation - Subsurface Soil (6 - 72 inches bgs)''
CRPA-003.3 (30-36)
36
--
--
--
1.2
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
CRPA-004.3 (7-13)
13
-
-
-
1.45
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRPA-005.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
2.66
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRPA-007.3 (6-12)
12
-
-
-
1.46
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRPA-010.3 (9-15)
15
-
-
-
1.95
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRPA-011.3 (15-21)
21
-
-
-
1.28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRPA-012.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
1.21
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRPA-013.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
1.27
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRPA-U1.3 (14-20)
20
-
-
-
2.19
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-001.3 (14-20)
20
-
-
-
1.12
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-002.3 (13-19)
19
-
-
-
0.95
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-003.3 (6-11)
11
-
-
-
1.93
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-004.3 (14-20)
20
-
-
-
1.63
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-005.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
1.17
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-006.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
1.25
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-007.3 (6-12)
12
-
-
-
1.71
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-008.3 (18-24)
24
-
-
-
1.75
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-009.3 (16-22)
22
-
-
-
1.28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-010.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
1.51
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-011.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
1.89
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-012.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
1.89
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-015.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
2.66
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-017.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
2.22
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-018.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
2.93
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-020.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
3.28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-021.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
1.94
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-023.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
2.45
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-024.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
1.95
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-026.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
2.82
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-027.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
1.41
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-028.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
1.42
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-029.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
1.54
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-030.3 (6-12)
12
-
-
-
1.47
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-031.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-032.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
2.06
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-033.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
3.05
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-034.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
1.62
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Page 11 of 12
-------
Table C-10. Comparison of Individual Sample Results to Plant and Invertebrate NOECs
Sample ID
Sample
Depth
Bottom
COPECa:
Uranium-
238
Uranium-
234
Thorium-
230
Radium-226 in
SE (Adjusted
Radium-226)
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium15
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Manganese
Molybdenum
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Thallium
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
Plant NOECc:
50
44
110
5.0
NSL
11
18
110
2.5
32
0.35
13
70
NSL
120
220
2
38
0.52
NSL
0.050
25
60
160
Soil Invertebrate
NOECc:
13,000
12,000
37,000
240
NSL
78
6.8
330
40
140
0.34
NSL
80
NSL
1,700
450
NSL
280
4.1
NSL
NSL
NSL
NSL
120
Units:
pCi/g
pCi/g
pCi/g
pCi/g
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
CRUA-035.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
1.64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-036.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
2.09
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
KMA-SS02-0012-0018-01
18
-
-
-
0.75
4200
0.064
5.6
75
0.39
0.073
4.5
4.5
5.1
15000
8
400
0.45
5.5
0.9
0.06 U
0.082
0.56
13
32
Frequency of Plant NOEC Exceedance:
0/0
0/0
0/0
0/40
0/1
0/1
0/1
0/1
0/1
0/1
1/1
0/1
0/1
0/1
0/1
1/1
0/1
0/1
1/1
0/1
1/1
0/1
0/1
0/1
Arroyos on United Nuclear Corporation Property- Surface Soil (0 - 6 inches bgs)
CRPA-001.1 (0-2)
2
--
--
--
0.79
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
CRPA-001.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.36
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRPA-002.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
1.07
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRPA-002.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.02
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRPA-003.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
0.84
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRPA-003.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.55
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-037.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
0.79
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-037.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
1.09
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-038.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
0.74
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-038.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
0.68
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-039.1 (0-2)
2
-
-
-
0.58
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-039.2 (2-6)
6
-
-
-
0.86
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
KMA-SS01 -0000-0003-01
3
-
-
-
0.85
4400
0.055
4.6
48
0.37
0.054
4.4
4.7
13000
7.5
240
0.28
5.5
1.3
0.057 U
0.09
0.53
12
30
Frequency of Plant NOEC Exceedance:
0/0
0/0
0/0
0/13
0/1
0/1
0/1
0/1
0/1
0/1
1/1
0/1
0/1
0/1
0/1
1/1
0/1
0/1
1/1
0/1
1/1
0/1
0/1
0/1
Frequency of Soil Invertebrate NOEC Exceedance:
0/0
0/0
0/0
0/13
0/1
0/1
0/1
0/1
0/1
0/1
1/1
0/1
0/1
0/1
0/1
0/1
0/1
0/1
0/1
0/1
0/1
0/1
0/1
0/1
Frequency of Plant and Soil Invertebrate Exceedance:
0/0
0/0
0/0
0/13
0/1
0/1
0/1
0/1
0/1
0/1
1/1
0/1
0/1
0/1
0/1
1/1
0/1
0/1
1/1
0/1
1/1
0/1
0/1
0/1
Arroyos on United Nuclear Corporation Property - Subsurface Soil (6 - 72 inches bgs) d
CRPA-001.3 (30-36)
36
--
--
--
1.17
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
-
--
--
--
CRPA-002.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
1.01
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRPA-003.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
1.2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-037.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
1.83
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-038.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
0.69
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
CRUA-039.3 (30-36)
36
-
-
-
0.57
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
KMA-SS01-0012-0018-01
18
-
-
-
0.82
4700
0.067
4.8
62
0.4
0.055
5
3.9
5.4
15000
7.5
280
0.28
5.8
0.91
0.059 U
0.086
0.62
13
33
Frequency of Plant NOEC Exceedance:
0/0
0/0
0/0
0/7
0/1
0/1
0/1
0/1
0/1
0/1
1/1
0/1
0/1
0/1
0/1
1/1
0/1
0/1
1/1
0/1
1/1
0/1
0/1
0/1
Analvte Identified as Surface Soil Candidate COEC? 6
No
No
No
Yes (P)
No
No
Yes (I)
Yes (P/l)
No
No
Yes (P/l)
No
No
No
Yes (P)
Yes (P)
No
No
Yes (P/l)
No
Yes (P)
Yes (P)
No
No
Analvte Identified as Subsurface Soil Candidate COEC? 6
Yes (P)
Yes (P)
No
Yes (P)
No
No
No
Yes (P)
No
No
Yes (P)
No
No
No
No
Yes (P)
No
No
Yes (P)
No
Yes (P)
Yes (P)
No
No
Notes:
xceeds plant NOEC.
xceeds soil invertebrate NOEC.
|||||||||||||||||||^^ both soil invertebrate and plant NOECs.
a A constituent is included as a COPEC if the calculated SLERA HQ is equal to or greater than 1.0 (see Table C-8).
b In the absence of speciated chromium data, chromium is evaluated using the assumption that it is 100 percent hexavalent chromium (USEPA 2024b). No speciated chromium data are available. LANL chromium screening values are based on Cr(VI) (hexavalent chromium) for plants and invertebrates (Newport News Nuclear BWXT-Los Alamos, LLC. 2022).
c Screening levels for plants and invertebrates are NOECs (see Table C-8).
d Plants are exposed to surface and subsurface soil from 0 to 72 inches bgs. Soil invertebrates are exposed to surface soil (0 to 6 inches bgs) only; subsurface soil samples results are not compared to soil invertebrates NOECs.
6 COPECs are identified as candidate COECs if at least one sample result exceeds the plant or soil invertebrate NOEC for surface soil, or the plant NOEC for subsurface soil. "P" refers to "plant" and "I" refers to "invertebrate."
-
Not analyzed
bgs
Below ground surface
COEC
Contaminant of ecological concern
COPEC
Contaminant of potential ecological concern
HQ
Hazard quotient
mg/kg
Milligram per kilogram
NOEC
No observed effect concentration
NSL
No screening level
pCi/g
Picocurie per gram
Ra-226
Radium-226
SLERA
Screening-level ecological risk assessment
U
Not detected
USEPA
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
References:
Newport News Nuclear BWXT-Los Alamos, LLC. 2022. "ECORISK Database." Release 4.3. 701067. Document EM2020-0575. September.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2024b. "Navajo Abandoned Uranium Mines Risk Assessment Methodology." Draft Final. March.
Page 12 of 12
-------
Table C-11. Screening-Level Ecological Risk Assessment Refinement for Soil - Birds
Site-Wide
COPEC3
EPCb
Avian
Herbivore
NOEC0
Avian
Ground
Insectivore
NOEC0
Avian
Carnivore
NOEC0
Minimum
Avian
NOEC
Refined HQ
based on
Minimum
Avian NOECd
Include
Contaminant
as Candidate
COEC for
Birds?8
Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
Radionuclides (pCi/q) '
Uranium-238
1.6
2,700
2,700
2,700
2,700
0.00059
No
Uranium-234
1.6
2,800
2,800
2,800
2,800
0.00057
No
Thorium-230
2.5
8,700
8,700
8,700
8,700
0.00029
No
Radium-226 in SE
(Adjusted Radium-226)
5.9
15
15
15
15
0.39
No
Metals (mg/kg)
Arsenic
5.7
67
43
1,100
43
0.13
No
Barium
94
720
820
7,500
720
0.13
No
Chromium 9
7.6
78
26
780
26
0.29
No
Lead
14
46
11
510
11
1.3
Yes
Manganese
190
4,300
4,300
650,000
4300
0.04
No
Nickel
8.3
210
20
2,800
20
0.42
No
Selenium
3.0
2.2
1.2
83
1.2
2.5
Yes
Thallium
0.14
6.9
4.5
48
4.5
0.03
No
Uranium
6.2
1,500
1,100
14,000
1100
0.01
No
Vanadium
17
13
7.8
140
7.8
2.2
Yes
Zinc
48
950
46
30,000
46
1.0
Yes
Notes:
Grey highlighted cells indicate the EPC exceeds the NOEC for the receptor group.
a Bolded COPECs have a HQ greater than 1.0.
b EPCs are provided in Table C-9.
cSee Table C-8 for sources of NOECs.
d HQ is calculated by dividing the EPC by the minimum NOEC. Bolded HQ values indicate HQs greater than or equal to 1.0.
e A contaminant is identified as a candidate COEC if the HQ (HQ based on minimum NOEC) is greater than or equal to 1.0.
f ESLs for uranium-238 in SE are based on individual radium-226 ESLs that are adjusted to include doses from all progeny
of uranium-238 in secular equilibrium. Site data for radium-226 are used to evaluate uranium-238 in SE.
g In the absence of speciated chromium data, chromium is evaluated using the assumption that it is 100 percent hexavalent
chromium (USEPA 2024b). No speciated chromium data are available. Eco-SSLs for hexavalent chromium are not available
for birds; therefore,Cr(lll) (trivalent chromium) Eco-SSLs were used (USEPA 2023a).
bgs
Below ground surface
mg/kg
Milligram per kilogram
COEC
Contaminant of ecological concern
NOEC
No observed effect concentration
COPEC
Contaminant of potential ecological concern
NSL
No screening level
Eco-SSL
Ecological soil screening level
pCi/g
Picocurie per gram
EPC
Exposure point concentration
SE
Secular equilibrium
ESL
Ecological screening level
USEPA
U.S. Environmental Protection
HQ
Hazard quotient
Agency
Page 1 of 2
-------
Table C-11. Screening-Level Ecological Risk Assessment Refinement for Soil - Birds
References:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2023a. "Interim Ecological Soil Screening Level Documents." Accessed
July 20. https://www.epa.gov/chemical-research/interim-ecological-soil-screening-level-documents.
USEPA. 2024b. "Navajo Abandoned Uranium Mines Risk Assessment Methodology." Draft Final. March.
Page 2 of 2
-------
Table C-12. Screening-Level Ecological Risk Assessment Refinement for Soil - Mammals
Site-Wide
Mammalian
Mammalian
Ground
Insectivore
NOECc
Mammalian
Minimum
NOEC
Refined HQ
based on
Include
Contaminant
COPECa
EPCb
Herbivore
NOEC0
Carnivore
NOECc
Minimum
Mammalian
as Candidate
COEC for
NOECd
Mammals?8
Surface Soil (0-6 inches bgs)
Radionuclides (pCi/q) f
Uranium-238
1.6
1,400
1,400
1,400
1,400
0.0011
No
Uranium-234
1.6
1,400
1,400
1,400
1,400
0.0011
No
Thorium-230
2.5
3,700
3,700
3,700
3,700
0.0007
No
Radium-226 in SE
(Adjusted Radium-226)
5.9
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
0.98
No
Metals (mg/kg)
Arsenic
5.7
170
46
170
46
0.12
No
Barium
94
3,200
200
9,100
200
0.47
No
Chromium 9
7.6
380
34
180
34
0.22
No
Lead
14
1,200
56
460
56
0.25
No
Manganese
190
5,300
4,000
6,200
4,000
0.048
No
Nickel
8.3
340
10
130
10
0.83
No
Selenium
3.0
2.7
0.63
2.8
0.63
4.8
Yes
Thallium
0.14
1.2
0.42
5.0
0.42
0.33
No
Uranium
6.2
1,000
480
4,800
480
0.013
No
Vanadium
17
1,300
280
580
280.0
0.061
No
Zinc
48
6,800
79
10,000
79
0.61
No
Subsurface Soil (0-72 inches bgs
Radionuclides (pCi/g)
Uranium-238
12
1,400
1,400
1,400
1,400
0.0086
No
Uranium-234
12
1,400
1,400
1,400
1,400
0.0086
No
Thorium-230
2.1
3,700
3,700
3,700
3,700
0.00057
No
Radium-226 in SE
(Adjusted Radium-226)
16
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
2.7
Yes
Metals (mg/kg)
Arsenic
5.6
170
46
170
46
0.12
No
Barium
84
3,200
200
9,100
200
0.42
No
Chromium 9
7.5
380
34
180
34
0.22
No
Lead
13
1,200
56
460
56
0.23
No
Manganese
200
5,300
4,000
6,200
4,000
0.050
No
Molybdenum
0.52
635
4.8
64
4.8
0.11
No
Nickel
8.1
340
10
130
10
0.81
No
Selenium
3.1
2.7
0.63
2.8
0.63
4.9
Yes
Silver
0.094
1,500
14
990
14
0.0067
No
Thallium
0.14
1.2
0.42
5.0
0.42
0.33
No
Uranium
16
1,000
480
4,800
480
0.033
No
Vanadium
16
1,300
280
580
280.0
0.057
No
Zinc
46
6,800
79
10,000
79
0.58
No
Page 1 of 2
-------
Table C-12. Screening-Level Ecological Risk Assessment Refinement for Soil - Mammals
Notes:
Grey highlighted cells indicate the EPC exceeds the NOEC for the receptor group.
a Bolded COPECs have a HQ greater than 1.0.
b EPCs are provided in Table C-9.
cSee Table C-8 for sources of NOECs.
d HQ is calculated by dividing the EPC by the minimum NOEC. Bolded HQ values indicate HQs equal to or greater than 1.0.
e A contaminant is identified as a candidate COEC if the HQ (HQ based on minimum NOEC) is equal to or greater than 1.0.
f ESLs for uranium-238 in SE are based on individual radium-226 ESLs that are adjusted to include doses from all progeny
of uranium-238 in secular equilibrium. Site data for radium-226 are used to evaluate uranium-238 in SE.
g In the absence of speciated chromium data, chromium is evaluated using the assumption that it is 100 percent hexavalent
chromium (USEPA 2024b). No speciated chromium data are available. Cr(lll) (trivalent chromium) Eco-SSLs were used for
mammals because the hexavalent chromium Eco-SSLs for mammals are higher than the trivalent chromium values
(USEPA 2023a).
bgs
Below ground surface
COPEC
Contaminant of potential ecological concern
Eco-SSL
Ecological soil screening level
HQ
Hazard quotient
LANL
Los Alamos National Laboratory
mg/kg
Milligram per kilogram
NA
Not applicable - receptor is not exposed to the subsurface depth interval
N3B
Newport News Nuclear BWXT-Los Alamos, LLC
NOEC
No observed effect concentration
NSL
No screening level
pCi/g
Picocurie per gram
SE
Secular equlibrium
USEPA
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
References:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2023a. "Interim Ecological Soil Screening Level Documents." Accessed
July 20. https://www.epa.gov/chemical-research/interim-ecological-soil-screening-level-documents.
USEPA. 2024b. "Navajo Abandoned Uranium Mines Risk Assessment Methodology." Draft Final. March.
Page 2 of 2
-------
ATTACHMENT C-l
DATA USED IN THE RISK ASSESSMENT
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
CR1
C1 LI-047.1 (0-2)
12/14/2010
35.6665979
-108.501549
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
7.9 G
0.6
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1 LI-047.1 (0-2) Dup
12/14/2010
35.6665979
-108.501549
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
7.9
0.6
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1SS-026.1 (0-2)
12/15/2010
35.6641373
-108.503343
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
26.9
0.6
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1SS-041.1 (0-2)
12/15/2010
35.6637671
-108.502242
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.42
0.8
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1SS-041.1 (0-2) Dup
12/15/2010
35.6637671
-108.502242
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
2.52
0.54
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1SS-063A.1 (0-2)
12/15/2010
35.6638077
-108.500865
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
41.2 G
0.8
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1SS-069.1 (0-2)
12/15/2010
35.6664561
-108.500366
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
4.68
0.41
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1SS-069.3 Dup
12/15/2010
35.6664561
-108.500366
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
3.7
0.54
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1SS-082.1 (0-2)
12/15/2010
35.6629857
-108.499478
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.43 G
0.39
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1SS-125.1 (0-2)
12/15/2010
35.665878
-108.497089
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.29 G
0.56
O
Q.
/g
CR1
RWPR-SS-003 (0-2)
10/8/2010
35.6660108
-108.504365
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
2.65 G
0.65
O
Q.
/g
CR1
RWPR-SS-005 (0-2)
10/8/2010
35.6658177
-108.504495
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.55
0.54
O
Q.
/g
CR1
RWPR-SS-019 (0-2)
10/8/2010
35.6646791
-108.504222
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
6.28 G
0.77
O
Q.
/g
CR1
RWPR-SS-021 (0-2)
10/6/2010
35.6644876
-108.504083
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
6.22
0.46
O
Q.
/g
CR1
RWPR-SS-221 (0-2)
10/6/2010
35.6644876
-108.504083
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
7.4 G
0.7
O
Q.
/g
CR1
RWPR-SS-003 (0-2)
10/8/2010
35.6660108
-108.504365
0
2
SW6020
URANIUM
3.5
11
mg/kg
CR1
RWPR-SS-005 (0-2)
10/8/2010
35.6658177
-108.504495
0
2
SW6020
URANIUM
2.1
10
mg/kg
CR1
RWPR-SS-019 (0-2)
10/8/2010
35.6646791
-108.504222
0
2
SW6020
URANIUM
6.2
11
mg/kg
CR1
RWPR-SS-021 (0-2)
10/6/2010
35.6644876
-108.504083
0
2
SW6020
URANIUM
4.7
11
mg/kg
CR1
RWPR-SS-221 (0-2)
10/6/2010
35.6644876
-108.504083
0
2
SW6020
URANIUM
4.6
12
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS05-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666713
-108.504141
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
3300
15
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS06-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667094
-108.502536
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
5800
16
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS06-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.667094
-108.502536
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
5000
15
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS07-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667085
-108.501729
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
4500
16
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS08-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666503
-108.503201
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
4400
15
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS09-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666327
-108.502514
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
5900
15
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS10-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666522
-108.501608
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
3100
16
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS11-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666126
-108.501314
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
4100
15
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS12-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666314
-108.500988
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
3600
15
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS13-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666176
-108.499679
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
4400
15
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS14-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666944
-108.499149
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
3700
17
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.66634
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
4100
15
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-02
5/18/2022
35.66634
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
4300
15
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS16-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.66598
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
4300
15
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS17-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665398
-108.498872
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
2300
15
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS18-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665202
-108.499554
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
3900
15
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS19-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665408
-108.500208
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
3500
15
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS20-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664437
-108.499566
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
2900
15
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS21 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663695
-108.499566
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
7000
16
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS22-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663664
-108.500468
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
5600
15
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS22-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.663664
-108.500468
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
5900
15
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS23-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663755
-108.501126
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
5600
17
mg/kg
Page 1 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
CR1
CR1-SS24-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664237
-108.500743
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
6200
16
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS25-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664474
-108.500594
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
4600
16
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS26-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664639
-108.501293
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
4400
16
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS27-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664035
-108.501678
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
3300
15
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS28-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664057
-108.503308
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
3600
16
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS29-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66443
-108.504
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
4400
15
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS30-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665182
-108.504127
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
4000
16
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS31 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665752
-108.504261
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
4600
15
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS32-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665946
-108.50414
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
4200
15
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS33-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663477
-108.501566
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
1400
15
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS34-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66306
-108.5
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
4800
15
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS05-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666713
-108.504141
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.088 J
0.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS06-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667094
-108.502536
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.18
0.11
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS06-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.667094
-108.502536
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.19
0.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS07-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667085
-108.501729
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.098 J
0.11
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS08-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666503
-108.503201
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.16
0.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS09-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666327
-108.502514
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.19
0.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS10-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666522
-108.501608
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.14 J
0.11
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS11-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666126
-108.501314
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.12
0.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS12-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666314
-108.500988
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.038 J
0.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS13-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666176
-108.499679
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.18
0.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS14-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666944
-108.499149
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.12
0.11
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.66634
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.082 J
0.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-02
5/18/2022
35.66634
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.097 J
0.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS16-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.66598
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.14
0.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS17-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665398
-108.498872
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.1
0.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS18-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665202
-108.499554
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.14
0.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS19-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665408
-108.500208
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.11
0.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS20-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664437
-108.499566
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.076 J
0.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS21 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663695
-108.499566
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.22
0.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS22-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663664
-108.500468
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.13
0.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS22-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.663664
-108.500468
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.11
0.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS23-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663755
-108.501126
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.14
0.12
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS24-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664237
-108.500743
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.11
0.11
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS25-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664474
-108.500594
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.13
0.11
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS26-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664639
-108.501293
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.16 J
0.11
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS27-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664035
-108.501678
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.15
0.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS28-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664057
-108.503308
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.11 J
0.11
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS29-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66443
-108.504
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.12
0.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS30-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665182
-108.504127
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.089 J
0.11
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS31 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665752
-108.504261
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.078 J
0.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS32-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665946
-108.50414
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.13
0.1
mg/kg
Page 2 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
CR1
CR1-SS33-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663477
-108.501566
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.055 J
0.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS34-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66306
-108.5
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.14
0.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS05-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666713
-108.504141
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
3.6
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS06-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667094
-108.502536
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
5.8
0.21
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS06-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.667094
-108.502536
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
5.2
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS07-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667085
-108.501729
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
3.5
0.21
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS08-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666503
-108.503201
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
5.3
0.21
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS09-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666327
-108.502514
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
5.3
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS10-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666522
-108.501608
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
5.9
0.22
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS11-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666126
-108.501314
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
4.6
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS12-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666314
-108.500988
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
2.9
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS13-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666176
-108.499679
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
4.8
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS14-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666944
-108.499149
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
4.2
0.23
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.66634
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
4
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-02
5/18/2022
35.66634
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
4.2
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS16-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.66598
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
5
0.21
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS17-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665398
-108.498872
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
3.7
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS18-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665202
-108.499554
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
4.7
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS19-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665408
-108.500208
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
4.1
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS20-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664437
-108.499566
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
3.8
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS21-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663695
-108.499566
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
5.9
0.21
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS22-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663664
-108.500468
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
5.3
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS22-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.663664
-108.500468
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
5.1
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS23-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663755
-108.501126
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
5.8
0.23
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS24-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664237
-108.500743
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
5.3
0.21
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS25-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664474
-108.500594
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
6.1
0.22
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS26-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664639
-108.501293
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
6.1
0.22
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS27-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664035
-108.501678
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
4.3
0.21
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS28-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664057
-108.503308
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
3.5
0.22
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS29-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66443
-108.504
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
4.7
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS30-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665182
-108.504127
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
4.3
0.21
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS31 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665752
-108.504261
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
3.6
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS32-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665946
-108.50414
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
4.1
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS33-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663477
-108.501566
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
3
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS34-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66306
-108.5
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
5
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS05-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666713
-108.504141
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
68
0.51
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS06-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667094
-108.502536
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
79
0.53
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS06-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.667094
-108.502536
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
86
0.51
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS07-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667085
-108.501729
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
87
0.53
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS08-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666503
-108.503201
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
89
0.51
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS09-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666327
-108.502514
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
65
0.51
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS10-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666522
-108.501608
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
43 J
0.55
mg/kg
Page 3 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
CR1
CR1-SS11-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666126
-108.501314
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
78
0.51
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS12-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666314
-108.500988
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
36
0.5
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS13-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666176
-108.499679
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
85
0.5
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS14-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666944
-108.499149
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
77
0.57
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.66634
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
97
0.5
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-02
5/18/2022
35.66634
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
120
0.5
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS16-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.66598
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
94
0.51
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS17-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665398
-108.498872
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
80
0.5
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS18-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665202
-108.499554
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
90
0.5
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS19-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665408
-108.500208
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
210
0.5
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS20-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664437
-108.499566
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
54
0.5
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS21 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663695
-108.499566
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
100
0.52
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS22-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663664
-108.500468
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
110
0.5
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS22-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.663664
-108.500468
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
110
0.51
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS23-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663755
-108.501126
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
98
0.58
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS24-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664237
-108.500743
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
330
0.53
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS25-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664474
-108.500594
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
98
0.55
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS26-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664639
-108.501293
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
100
0.54
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS27-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664035
-108.501678
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
66
0.52
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS28-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664057
-108.503308
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
66
0.55
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS29-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66443
-108.504
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
95
0.51
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS30-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665182
-108.504127
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
66
0.53
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS31-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665752
-108.504261
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
41
0.51
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS32-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665946
-108.50414
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
83
0.51
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS33-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663477
-108.501566
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
63
0.5
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS34-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66306
-108.5
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
86
0.51
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS05-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666713
-108.504141
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.47
0.051
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS06-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667094
-108.502536
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.87
0.053
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS06-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.667094
-108.502536
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.75
0.051
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS07-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667085
-108.501729
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.54
0.053
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS08-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666503
-108.503201
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.63
0.051
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS09-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666327
-108.502514
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.8
0.051
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS10-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666522
-108.501608
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.5
0.055
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS11-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666126
-108.501314
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.61
0.051
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS12-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666314
-108.500988
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.56
0.05
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS13-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666176
-108.499679
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.68
0.05
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS14-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666944
-108.499149
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.52
0.057
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.66634
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.43
0.05
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-02
5/18/2022
35.66634
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.46
0.05
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS16-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.66598
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.62
0.051
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS17-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665398
-108.498872
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.32
0.05
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS18-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665202
-108.499554
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.57
0.05
mg/kg
Page 4 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
CR1
CR1-SS19-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665408
-108.500208
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.45
0.05
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS20-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664437
-108.499566
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.38
0.05
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS21 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663695
-108.499566
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.97
0.052
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS22-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663664
-108.500468
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.69
0.05
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS22-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.663664
-108.500468
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.71
0.051
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS23-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663755
-108.501126
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.8
0.058
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS24-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664237
-108.500743
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.78
0.053
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS25-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664474
-108.500594
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.62
0.055
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS26-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664639
-108.501293
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.71
0.054
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS27-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664035
-108.501678
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.5
0.052
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS28-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664057
-108.503308
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.43
0.055
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS29-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66443
-108.504
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.62
0.051
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS30-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665182
-108.504127
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.49
0.053
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS31 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665752
-108.504261
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.44
0.051
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS32-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665946
-108.50414
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.57
0.051
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS33-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663477
-108.501566
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.2
0.05
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS34-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66306
-108.5
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.62
0.051
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS05-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666713
-108.504141
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.083 J
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS06-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667094
-108.502536
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.22
0.21
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS06-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.667094
-108.502536
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.21
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS07-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667085
-108.501729
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.1 J
0.21
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS08-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666503
-108.503201
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.12 J
0.21
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS09-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666327
-108.502514
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.21
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS10-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666522
-108.501608
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.13 J
0.22
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS11-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666126
-108.501314
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.12 J
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS12-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666314
-108.500988
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.038 U
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS13-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666176
-108.499679
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.14 J
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS14-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666944
-108.499149
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.13 J
0.23
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.66634
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.1 J
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-02
5/18/2022
35.66634
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.09 J
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS16-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.66598
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.13 J
0.21
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS17-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665398
-108.498872
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.065 J
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS18-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665202
-108.499554
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.13 J
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS19-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665408
-108.500208
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.081 J
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS20-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664437
-108.499566
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.086 J
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS21 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663695
-108.499566
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.25
0.21
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS22-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663664
-108.500468
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.14 J
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS22-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.663664
-108.500468
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.13 J
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS23-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663755
-108.501126
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.19 J
0.23
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS24-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664237
-108.500743
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.18 J
0.21
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS25-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664474
-108.500594
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.17 J
0.22
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS26-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664639
-108.501293
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.15 J
0.22
mg/kg
Page 5 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
CR1
CR1-SS27-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664035
-108.501678
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.12 J
0.21
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS28-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664057
-108.503308
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.12 J
0.22
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS29-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66443
-108.504
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.15 J
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS30-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665182
-108.504127
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.11 J
0.21
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS31 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665752
-108.504261
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.11 J
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS32-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665946
-108.50414
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.13 J
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS33-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663477
-108.501566
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.051 J
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS34-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66306
-108.5
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.12 J
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS05-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666713
-108.504141
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
4
1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS06-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667094
-108.502536
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
6.1
1.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS06-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.667094
-108.502536
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
5.4
1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS07-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667085
-108.501729
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
4.1
1.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS08-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666503
-108.503201
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
4.9
1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS09-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666327
-108.502514
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
6.8
1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS10-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666522
-108.501608
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
3.4
1.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS11-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666126
-108.501314
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
4.3
1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS12-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666314
-108.500988
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
4.1
1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS13-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666176
-108.499679
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
4.7
1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS14-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666944
-108.499149
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
4
1.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.66634
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
4.3
1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-02
5/18/2022
35.66634
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
4.8
1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS16-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.66598
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
4.5
1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS17-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665398
-108.498872
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
2.7
1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS18-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665202
-108.499554
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
4.6
1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS19-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665408
-108.500208
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
4.2
1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS20-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664437
-108.499566
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
3
1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS21 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663695
-108.499566
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
7.5
1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS22-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663664
-108.500468
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
11
1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS22-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.663664
-108.500468
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
12
1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS23-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663755
-108.501126
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
6
1.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS24-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664237
-108.500743
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
6.4
1.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS25-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664474
-108.500594
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
5.2
1.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS26-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664639
-108.501293
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
4.6
1.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS27-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664035
-108.501678
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
3.7
1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS28-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664057
-108.503308
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
5.6
1.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS29-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66443
-108.504
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
5.3
1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS30-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665182
-108.504127
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
4.5
1.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS31 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665752
-108.504261
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
6.2
1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS32-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665946
-108.50414
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
13
1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS33-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663477
-108.501566
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
2.3
1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS34-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66306
-108.5
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
5.2
1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS05-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666713
-108.504141
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
4.4
0.51
mg/kg
Page 6 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
CR1
CR1-SS06-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667094
-108.502536
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
7.9
0.53
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS06-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.667094
-108.502536
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
7
0.51
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS07-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667085
-108.501729
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
8
0.53
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS08-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666503
-108.503201
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
5.6
0.51
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS09-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666327
-108.502514
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
7
0.51
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS10-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666522
-108.501608
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
6.1
0.55
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS11-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666126
-108.501314
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
6.1
0.51
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS12-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666314
-108.500988
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
6.2
0.5
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS13-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666176
-108.499679
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
6.1
0.5
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS14-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666944
-108.499149
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
4.8
0.57
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.66634
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
3.6
0.5
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-02
5/18/2022
35.66634
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
3.9
0.5
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS16-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.66598
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
6
0.51
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS17-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665398
-108.498872
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
3.7
0.5
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS18-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665202
-108.499554
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
5.7
0.5
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS19-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665408
-108.500208
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
4.3
0.5
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS20-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664437
-108.499566
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
4.3
0.5
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS21 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663695
-108.499566
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
8.3
0.52
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS22-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663664
-108.500468
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
6.4
0.5
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS22-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.663664
-108.500468
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
6.4
0.51
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS23-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663755
-108.501126
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
7.3
0.58
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS24-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664237
-108.500743
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
6.9
0.53
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS25-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664474
-108.500594
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
6.3
0.55
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS26-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664639
-108.501293
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
5.7
0.54
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS27-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664035
-108.501678
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
5
0.52
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS28-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664057
-108.503308
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
4
0.55
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS29-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66443
-108.504
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
5.7
0.51
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS30-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665182
-108.504127
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
5.2
0.53
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS31-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665752
-108.504261
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
3.4
0.51
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS32-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665946
-108.50414
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
6.3
0.51
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS33-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663477
-108.501566
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
2.5
0.5
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS34-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66306
-108.5
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
5.8
0.51
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS05-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666713
-108.504141
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
6.3
2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS06-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667094
-108.502536
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
19
2.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS06-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.667094
-108.502536
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
16
2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS07-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667085
-108.501729
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
9.2
2.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS08-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666503
-108.503201
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
9.9
2.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS09-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666327
-108.502514
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
16
2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS10-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666522
-108.501608
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
10
2.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS11-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666126
-108.501314
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
10
2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS12-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666314
-108.500988
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
3.9
2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS13-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666176
-108.499679
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
12
2
mg/kg
Page 7 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
CR1
CR1-SS14-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666944
-108.499149
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
8
2.3
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.66634
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
5.9
2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-02
5/18/2022
35.66634
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
5.9
2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS16-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.66598
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
16
2.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS17-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665398
-108.498872
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
5
2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS18-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665202
-108.499554
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
10
2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS19-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665408
-108.500208
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
6.9
2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS20-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664437
-108.499566
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
6.1
2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS21 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663695
-108.499566
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
21
2.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS22-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663664
-108.500468
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
13
2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS22-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.663664
-108.500468
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
14
2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS23-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663755
-108.501126
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
17
2.3
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS24-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664237
-108.500743
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
15
2.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS25-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664474
-108.500594
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
12
2.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS26-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664639
-108.501293
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
12
2.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS27-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664035
-108.501678
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
9.4
2.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS28-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664057
-108.503308
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
7.6
2.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS29-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66443
-108.504
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
12
2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS30-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665182
-108.504127
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
7.8
2.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS31 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665752
-108.504261
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
5.7
2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS32-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665946
-108.50414
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
12
2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS33-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663477
-108.501566
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
3.2
2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS34-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66306
-108.5
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
11
2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS05-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666713
-108.504141
0
3
SW6020
IRON
7900
20
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS06-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667094
-108.502536
0
3
SW6020
IRON
11000
21
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS06-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.667094
-108.502536
0
3
SW6020
IRON
10000
20
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS07-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667085
-108.501729
0
3
SW6020
IRON
11000
21
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS08-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666503
-108.503201
0
3
SW6020
IRON
11000
21
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS09-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666327
-108.502514
0
3
SW6020
IRON
13000
20
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS10-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666522
-108.501608
0
3
SW6020
IRON
11000
22
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS11-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666126
-108.501314
0
3
SW6020
IRON
10000
20
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS12-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666314
-108.500988
0
3
SW6020
IRON
9900
20
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS13-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666176
-108.499679
0
3
SW6020
IRON
11000
20
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS14-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666944
-108.499149
0
3
SW6020
IRON
9200
23
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.66634
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
IRON
8600
20
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-02
5/18/2022
35.66634
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
IRON
9400
20
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS16-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.66598
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
IRON
10000
21
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS17-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665398
-108.498872
0
3
SW6020
IRON
7300
20
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS18-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665202
-108.499554
0
3
SW6020
IRON
9200
20
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS19-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665408
-108.500208
0
3
SW6020
IRON
9200
20
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS20-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664437
-108.499566
0
3
SW6020
IRON
7800
20
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS21 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663695
-108.499566
0
3
SW6020
IRON
13000
21
mg/kg
Page 8 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
CR1
CR1-SS22-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663664
-108.500468
0
3
SW6020
IRON
12000
20
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS22-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.663664
-108.500468
0
3
SW6020
IRON
12000
20
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS23-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663755
-108.501126
0
3
SW6020
IRON
12000
23
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS24-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664237
-108.500743
0
3
SW6020
IRON
12000
21
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS25-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664474
-108.500594
0
3
SW6020
IRON
12000
22
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS26-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664639
-108.501293
0
3
SW6020
IRON
13000
22
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS27-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664035
-108.501678
0
3
SW6020
IRON
9800
21
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS28-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664057
-108.503308
0
3
SW6020
IRON
8400
22
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS29-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66443
-108.504
0
3
SW6020
IRON
9600
20
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS30-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665182
-108.504127
0
3
SW6020
IRON
9300
21
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS31 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665752
-108.504261
0
3
SW6020
IRON
10000
20
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS32-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665946
-108.50414
0
3
SW6020
IRON
9900
20
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS33-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663477
-108.501566
0
3
SW6020
IRON
5000
20
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS34-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66306
-108.5
0
3
SW6020
IRON
11000
20
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS05-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666713
-108.504141
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
8.7
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS06-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667094
-108.502536
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
17
0.21
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS06-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.667094
-108.502536
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
14
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS07-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667085
-108.501729
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
10
0.21
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS08-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666503
-108.503201
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
10
0.21
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS09-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666327
-108.502514
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
15
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS10-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666522
-108.501608
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
11
0.22
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS11-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666126
-108.501314
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
10
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS12-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666314
-108.500988
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
7.2
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS13-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666176
-108.499679
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
11
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS14-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666944
-108.499149
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
9.1
0.23
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.66634
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
7.6
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-02
5/18/2022
35.66634
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
7.8
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS16-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.66598
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
10
0.21
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS17-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665398
-108.498872
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
6.9
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS18-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665202
-108.499554
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
10
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS19-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665408
-108.500208
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
7.7
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS20-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664437
-108.499566
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
7.7
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS21-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663695
-108.499566
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
18
0.21
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS22-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663664
-108.500468
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
12
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS22-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.663664
-108.500468
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
12
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS23-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663755
-108.501126
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
14
0.23
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS24-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664237
-108.500743
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
14
0.21
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS25-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664474
-108.500594
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
11
0.22
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS26-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664639
-108.501293
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
12
0.22
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS27-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664035
-108.501678
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
8.9
0.21
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS28-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664057
-108.503308
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
11
0.22
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS29-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66443
-108.504
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
11
0.2
mg/kg
Page 9 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
CR1
CR1-SS30-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665182
-108.504127
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
9.1
0.21
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS31 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665752
-108.504261
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
10
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS32-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665946
-108.50414
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
9.8
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS33-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663477
-108.501566
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
4.8
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS34-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66306
-108.5
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
11
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS05-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666713
-108.504141
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
120
0.76
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS06-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667094
-108.502536
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
150
0.79
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS06-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.667094
-108.502536
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
150
0.77
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS07-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667085
-108.501729
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
170
0.79
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS08-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666503
-108.503201
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
170
0.77
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS09-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666327
-108.502514
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
160
0.76
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS10-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666522
-108.501608
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
140
0.82
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS11-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666126
-108.501314
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
150
0.76
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS12-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666314
-108.500988
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
150
0.75
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS13-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666176
-108.499679
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
160
0.76
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS14-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666944
-108.499149
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
140
0.85
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.66634
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
120
0.76
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-02
5/18/2022
35.66634
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
130
0.75
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS16-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.66598
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
160
0.77
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS17-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665398
-108.498872
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
120
0.75
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS18-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665202
-108.499554
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
150
0.75
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS19-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665408
-108.500208
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
190
0.75
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS20-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664437
-108.499566
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
100
0.76
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS21-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663695
-108.499566
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
180
0.78
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS22-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663664
-108.500468
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
170
0.75
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS22-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.663664
-108.500468
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
180
0.77
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS23-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663755
-108.501126
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
180
0.86
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS24-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664237
-108.500743
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
200
0.79
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS25-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664474
-108.500594
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
200
0.82
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS26-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664639
-108.501293
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
170
0.81
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS27-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664035
-108.501678
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
140
0.77
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS28-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664057
-108.503308
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
130
0.82
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS29-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66443
-108.504
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
170
0.77
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS30-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665182
-108.504127
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
140
0.8
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS31 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665752
-108.504261
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
100
0.76
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS32-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665946
-108.50414
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
150
0.77
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS33-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663477
-108.501566
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
89
0.75
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS34-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66306
-108.5
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
160
0.76
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS05-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666713
-108.504141
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.15 J
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS06-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667094
-108.502536
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.42
0.21
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS06-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.667094
-108.502536
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.38
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS07-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667085
-108.501729
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.18 J
0.21
mg/kg
Page 10 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
CR1
CR1-SS08-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666503
-108.503201
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.29
0.21
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS09-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666327
-108.502514
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.37
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS10-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666522
-108.501608
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.28
0.22
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS11-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666126
-108.501314
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.25
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS12-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666314
-108.500988
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.16 J
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS13-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666176
-108.499679
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.34
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS14-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666944
-108.499149
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.21 J
0.23
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.66634
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.28
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-02
5/18/2022
35.66634
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.32
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS16-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.66598
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.27
0.21
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS17-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665398
-108.498872
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.19 J
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS18-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665202
-108.499554
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.23
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS19-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665408
-108.500208
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.39
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS20-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664437
-108.499566
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.18 J
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS21 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663695
-108.499566
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.4
0.21
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS22-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663664
-108.500468
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.49
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS22-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.663664
-108.500468
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.53
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS23-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663755
-108.501126
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.27
0.23
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS24-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664237
-108.500743
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.35
0.21
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS25-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664474
-108.500594
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.34
0.22
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS26-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664639
-108.501293
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.61 J
0.22
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS27-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664035
-108.501678
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.27
0.21
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS28-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664057
-108.503308
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.26
0.22
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS29-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66443
-108.504
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.27
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS30-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665182
-108.504127
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.2 J
0.21
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS31-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665752
-108.504261
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.21
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS32-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665946
-108.50414
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.28
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS33-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663477
-108.501566
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.15 J
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS34-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66306
-108.5
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.27
0.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS05-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666713
-108.504141
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
4.7
2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS06-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667094
-108.502536
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
9
2.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS06-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.667094
-108.502536
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
8.1
2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS07-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667085
-108.501729
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
5
2.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS08-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666503
-108.503201
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
6.5
2.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS09-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666327
-108.502514
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
9.2
2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS10-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666522
-108.501608
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
5.9
2.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS11-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666126
-108.501314
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
6.2
2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS12-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666314
-108.500988
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
6.5
2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS13-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666176
-108.499679
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
7.2
2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS14-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666944
-108.499149
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
5.2
2.3
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.66634
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
4.2
2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-02
5/18/2022
35.66634
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
4.6
2
mg/kg
Page 11 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
CR1
CR1-SS16-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.66598
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
6.5
2.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS17-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665398
-108.498872
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
3.9
2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS18-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665202
-108.499554
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
6.4
2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS19-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665408
-108.500208
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
5.1
2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS20-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664437
-108.499566
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
4.2
2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS21 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663695
-108.499566
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
11
2.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS22-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663664
-108.500468
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
8.3
2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS22-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.663664
-108.500468
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
00
CO
2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS23-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663755
-108.501126
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
9.6
2.3
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS24-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664237
-108.500743
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
8.7
2.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS25-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664474
-108.500594
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
7.2
2.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS26-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664639
-108.501293
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
7.4
2.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS27-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664035
-108.501678
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
5.7
2.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS28-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664057
-108.503308
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
6.8
2.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS29-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66443
-108.504
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
7.6
2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS30-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665182
-108.504127
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
6.1
2.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS31-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665752
-108.504261
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
5.3
2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS32-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665946
-108.50414
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
16
2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS33-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663477
-108.501566
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
2.7
2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS34-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66306
-108.5
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
7.2
2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS05-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666713
-108.504141
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
1.4
0.54
o
Q.
/ g
CR1
CR1-SS06-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667094
-108.502536
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
1.86 J
0.6
O
Q.
/g
CR1
CR1-SS06-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.667094
-108.502536
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
1.9 J
0.63
pC
'g
CR1
CR1-SS07-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667085
-108.501729
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
2.87
0.52
pC
/g
CR1
CR1-SS08-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666503
-108.503201
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
3.13 J
0.48
o
Q.
/g
CR1
CR1-SS09-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666327
-108.502514
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
8.6 J
0.8
pC
/g
CR1
CR1-SS10-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666522
-108.501608
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
1.23
0.44
pC
/g
CR1
CR1-SS11-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666126
-108.501314
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
1.29
0.47
pC
/g
CR1
CR1-SS12-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666314
-108.500988
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
1.16
0.37
o
Q.
/g
CR1
CR1-SS13-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666176
-108.499679
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
2.25
0.55
pC
/g
CR1
CR1-SS14-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666944
-108.499149
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
1.42
0.37
pC
/g
CR1
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.66634
-108.498
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
2.29
0.54
pC
/g
CR1
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-02
5/18/2022
35.66634
-108.498
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
2.27
0.44
o
Q.
/g
CR1
CR1-SS16-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.66598
-108.498
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
1.73 J
0.32
pC
/g
CR1
CR1-SS17-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665398
-108.498872
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
0.82 J
0.44
pC
/g
CR1
CR1-SS18-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665202
-108.499554
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
1.33
0.52
pC
/g
CR1
CR1-SS19-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665408
-108.500208
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
18.2
0.5
o
Q.
/g
CR1
CR1-SS20-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664437
-108.499566
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
1.19
0.52
o
Q.
/g
CR1
CR1-SS21 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663695
-108.499566
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
2.27 J
0.44
pC
/g
CR1
CR1-SS22-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663664
-108.500468
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
1.77 J
0.53
pC
/g
CR1
CR1-SS22-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.663664
-108.500468
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
1.85 J
0.45
o
Q.
/g
CR1
CR1-SS23-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663755
-108.501126
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
1.54 J
0.34
o
Q.
/g
Page 12 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
CR1
CR1-SS24-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664237
-108.500743
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
19.2 J
0.7
O
Q.
/g
CR1
CR1-SS25-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664474
-108.500594
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
2.94 J
0.48
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
CR1-SS26-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664639
-108.501293
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
28.5
0.8
pC
/g
CR1
CR1-SS27-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664035
-108.501678
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
4.68
0.53
pC
/g
CR1
CR1-SS28-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664057
-108.503308
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
28
0.8
o
Q.
/ g
CR1
CR1-SS29-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66443
-108.504
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
3.21
0.36
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
CR1-SS30-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665182
-108.504127
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
2.12
0.52
pC
/g
CR1
CR1-SS31 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665752
-108.504261
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
6.28
0.49
pC
/g
CR1
CR1-SS32-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665946
-108.50414
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
6.3
0.5
o
Q.
/ g
CR1
CR1-SS33-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663477
-108.501566
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
0.6
0.38
O
Q.
/g
CR1
CR1-SS34-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66306
-108.5
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
1.13
0.41
pC
/g
CR1
CR1-SS05-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666713
-108.504141
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.1
1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS06-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667094
-108.502536
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.9
1.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS06-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.667094
-108.502536
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.6
1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS07-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667085
-108.501729
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.2
1.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS08-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666503
-108.503201
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.7
1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS09-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666327
-108.502514
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
3.2
1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS10-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666522
-108.501608
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.3
1.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS11-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666126
-108.501314
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.8
1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS12-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666314
-108.500988
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.2
1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS13-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666176
-108.499679
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.6
1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS14-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666944
-108.499149
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.3
1.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.66634
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.1
1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-02
5/18/2022
35.66634
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.2
1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS16-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.66598
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.4
1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS17-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665398
-108.498872
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
0.79 J
1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS18-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665202
-108.499554
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.3
1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS19-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665408
-108.500208
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
4.5
1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS20-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664437
-108.499566
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.1
1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS21-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663695
-108.499566
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
2.1
1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS22-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663664
-108.500468
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.6
1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS22-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.663664
-108.500468
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.6
1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS23-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663755
-108.501126
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.8
1.2
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS24-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664237
-108.500743
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
4.4
1.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS25-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664474
-108.500594
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.9
1.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS26-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664639
-108.501293
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
9.5
1.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS27-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664035
-108.501678
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
2.7
1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS28-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664057
-108.503308
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
14
1.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS29-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66443
-108.504
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.7
1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS30-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665182
-108.504127
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.4
1.1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS31-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665752
-108.504261
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
2.2
1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS32-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665946
-108.50414
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
2.3
1
mg/kg
Page 13 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
CR1
CR1-SS33-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663477
-108.501566
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
0.47 J
1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS34-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66306
-108.5
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.3
1
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS05-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666713
-108.504141
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.058 UJ
0.12
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS06-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667094
-108.502536
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.1 J
0.12
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS06-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.667094
-108.502536
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.08 J
0.12
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS07-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667085
-108.501729
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.06 UJ
0.12
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS08-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666503
-108.503201
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.058 UJ
0.12
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS09-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666327
-108.502514
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.072 J
0.12
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS10-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666522
-108.501608
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.062 UJ
0.12
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS11-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666126
-108.501314
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.058 UJ
0.12
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS12-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666314
-108.500988
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.057 UJ
0.11
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS13-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666176
-108.499679
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.059 J
0.12
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS14-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666944
-108.499149
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.065 UJ
0.13
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.66634
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.058 UJ
0.12
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-02
5/18/2022
35.66634
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.057 UJ
0.11
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS16-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.66598
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.059 UJ
0.12
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS17-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665398
-108.498872
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.057 UJ
0.11
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS18-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665202
-108.499554
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.057 UJ
0.11
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS19-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665408
-108.500208
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.057 UJ
0.11
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS20-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664437
-108.499566
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.057 UJ
0.11
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS21-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663695
-108.499566
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.1 J
0.12
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS22-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663664
-108.500468
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.071 J
0.11
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS22-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.663664
-108.500468
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.076 J
0.12
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS23-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663755
-108.501126
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.081 J
0.13
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS24-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664237
-108.500743
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.09 J
0.12
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS25-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664474
-108.500594
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.065 J
0.13
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS26-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664639
-108.501293
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.062 U
0.12
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS27-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664035
-108.501678
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.059 U
0.12
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS28-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664057
-108.503308
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.062 U
0.12
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS29-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66443
-108.504
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.058 U
0.12
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS30-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665182
-108.504127
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.061 U
0.12
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS31 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665752
-108.504261
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.058 U
0.12
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS32-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665946
-108.50414
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.058 U
0.12
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS33-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663477
-108.501566
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.057 U
0.11
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS34-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66306
-108.5
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.061 J
0.12
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS05-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666713
-108.504141
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.098
0.01
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS06-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667094
-108.502536
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.2
0.011
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS06-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.667094
-108.502536
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.17
0.01
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS07-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667085
-108.501729
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.15
0.011
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS08-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666503
-108.503201
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.14
0.01
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS09-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666327
-108.502514
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.16
0.01
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS10-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666522
-108.501608
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.13
0.011
mg/kg
Page 14 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
CR1
CR1-SS11-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666126
-108.501314
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.12
0.01
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS12-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666314
-108.500988
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.067
0.01
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS13-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666176
-108.499679
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.13
0.01
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS14-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666944
-108.499149
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.14
0.011
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.66634
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.094
0.01
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-02
5/18/2022
35.66634
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.094
0.01
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS16-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.66598
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.14
0.01
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS17-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665398
-108.498872
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.1
0.01
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS18-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665202
-108.499554
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.11
0.01
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS19-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665408
-108.500208
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.097
0.01
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS20-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664437
-108.499566
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.093
0.01
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS21 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663695
-108.499566
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.21
0.01
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS22-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663664
-108.500468
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.15
0.01
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS22-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.663664
-108.500468
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.15
0.01
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS23-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663755
-108.501126
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.18
0.012
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS24-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664237
-108.500743
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.17
0.011
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS25-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664474
-108.500594
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.13
0.011
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS26-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664639
-108.501293
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.15
0.011
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS27-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664035
-108.501678
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.097
0.01
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS28-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664057
-108.503308
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.089
0.011
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS29-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66443
-108.504
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.11
0.01
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS30-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665182
-108.504127
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.11
0.011
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS31 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665752
-108.504261
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.075
0.01
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS32-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665946
-108.50414
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.12
0.01
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS33-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663477
-108.501566
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.048
0.01
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS34-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66306
-108.5
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.14
0.01
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS05-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666713
-108.504141
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
1.5
0.02
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS06-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667094
-108.502536
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
2.6
0.021
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS06-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.667094
-108.502536
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
2.7
0.02
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS07-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667085
-108.501729
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
4.6
0.021
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS08-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666503
-108.503201
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
3.2
0.021
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS09-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666327
-108.502514
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
9
0.02
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS10-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666522
-108.501608
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
1.4
0.022
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS11-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666126
-108.501314
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
1
0.02
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS12-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666314
-108.500988
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
1.6
0.02
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS13-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666176
-108.499679
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
4.6
0.02
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS14-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666944
-108.499149
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
1.5
0.023
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.66634
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
1.5
0.02
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-02
5/18/2022
35.66634
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
1.8
0.02
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS16-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.66598
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
1.7
0.021
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS17-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665398
-108.498872
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
0.61
0.02
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS18-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665202
-108.499554
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
1.2
0.02
mg/kg
Page 15 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
CR1
CR1-SS19-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665408
-108.500208
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
00
CO
0.02
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS20-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664437
-108.499566
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
1.1
0.02
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS21 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663695
-108.499566
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
3.1
0.021
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS22-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663664
-108.500468
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
1.6
0.02
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS22-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.663664
-108.500468
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
1.6
0.02
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS23-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663755
-108.501126
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
1.2
0.023
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS24-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664237
-108.500743
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
21
0.021
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS25-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664474
-108.500594
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
1.9
0.022
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS26-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664639
-108.501293
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
55
0.022
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS27-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664035
-108.501678
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
4.9
0.021
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS28-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664057
-108.503308
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
20
0.022
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS29-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66443
-108.504
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
3.4
0.02
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS30-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665182
-108.504127
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
1.6
0.021
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS31 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665752
-108.504261
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
12
0.02
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS32-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665946
-108.50414
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
4.8
0.02
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS33-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663477
-108.501566
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
0.37
0.02
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS34-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66306
-108.5
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
0.91
0.02
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS05-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666713
-108.504141
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
11
0.51
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS06-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667094
-108.502536
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
14
0.53
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS06-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.667094
-108.502536
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
13
0.51
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS07-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667085
-108.501729
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
11
0.53
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS08-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666503
-108.503201
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
13
0.51
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS09-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666327
-108.502514
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
17
0.51
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS10-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666522
-108.501608
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
12
0.55
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS11-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666126
-108.501314
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
12
0.51
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS12-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666314
-108.500988
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
12
0.5
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS13-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666176
-108.499679
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
13
0.5
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS14-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666944
-108.499149
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
12
0.57
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.66634
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
11
0.5
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-02
5/18/2022
35.66634
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
12
0.5
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS16-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.66598
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
12
0.51
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS17-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665398
-108.498872
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
8.6
0.5
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS18-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665202
-108.499554
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
12
0.5
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS19-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665408
-108.500208
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
15
0.5
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS20-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664437
-108.499566
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
9.3
0.5
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS21 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663695
-108.499566
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
17
0.52
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS22-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663664
-108.500468
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
15
0.5
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS22-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.663664
-108.500468
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
15
0.51
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS23-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663755
-108.501126
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
15
0.58
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS24-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664237
-108.500743
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
19
0.53
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS25-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664474
-108.500594
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
15
0.55
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS26-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664639
-108.501293
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
20
0.54
mg/kg
Page 16 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
CR1
CR1-SS27-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664035
-108.501678
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
13
0.52
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS28-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664057
-108.503308
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
20
0.55
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS29-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66443
-108.504
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
13
0.51
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS30-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665182
-108.504127
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
11
0.53
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS31 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665752
-108.504261
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
13
0.51
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS32-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665946
-108.50414
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
15
0.51
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS33-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663477
-108.501566
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
5.4
0.5
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS34-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66306
-108.5
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
13
0.51
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS05-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666713
-108.504141
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
35
10
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS06-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667094
-108.502536
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
70
11
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS06-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.667094
-108.502536
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
62
10
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS07-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667085
-108.501729
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
41
11
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS08-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666503
-108.503201
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
43
10
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS09-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666327
-108.502514
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
61
10
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS10-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666522
-108.501608
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
45
11
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS11-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666126
-108.501314
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
45
10
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS12-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666314
-108.500988
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
52
10
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS13-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666176
-108.499679
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
47
10
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS14-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666944
-108.499149
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
38
11
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.66634
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
38
10
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS15-0000-0003-02
5/18/2022
35.66634
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
34
10
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS16-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.66598
-108.498
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
42
10
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS17-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665398
-108.498872
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
27
10
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS18-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665202
-108.499554
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
41
10
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS19-0000-0003-01
5/18/2022
35.665408
-108.500208
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
38
10
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS20-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664437
-108.499566
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
32
10
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS21-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663695
-108.499566
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
70
10
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS22-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663664
-108.500468
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
56
10
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS22-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.663664
-108.500468
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
56
10
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS23-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663755
-108.501126
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
62
12
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS24-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664237
-108.500743
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
62
11
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS25-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664474
-108.500594
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
60
11
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS26-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664639
-108.501293
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
48
11
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS27-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664035
-108.501678
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
43
10
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS28-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664057
-108.503308
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
37
11
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS29-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66443
-108.504
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
47
10
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS30-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665182
-108.504127
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
49
11
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS31 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665752
-108.504261
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
31
10
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS32-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665946
-108.50414
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
42
10
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS33-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.663477
-108.501566
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
18
10
mg/kg
CR1
CR1-SS34-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66306
-108.5
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
46
10
mg/kg
CR1
RWPR-SS-001 (0-6)
10/6/2010
35.6661433
-108.504248
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
4.54 G
0.44
pCi/g
Page 17 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Sample
Sample
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Top
Depth
(inches
Bottom
Depth
(inches
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
bgs)
bgs)
CR1
RWPR-SS-002 (0-6)
10/6/2010
35.6661419
-108.503999
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
2.9 G
0.54
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1 LI-005.1 (0-6)
12/14/2010
35.6663944
-108.503553
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
2.61 G
0.57
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LI-016.1 (0-6)
12/14/2010
35.6667753
-108.502749
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.14 G
0.49
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LI-026.1 (0-6)
12/14/2010
35.6669753
-108.50235
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
2.22 G
0.47
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LI-037.1 (0-6)
12/14/2010
35.6667797
-108.501957
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.37 G
0.48
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LI-058.1 (0-6)
12/14/2010
35.6660344
-108.500605
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
7.37
0.52
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LI-058.4 Dup
12/14/2010
35.6660344
-108.500605
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
9.6
0.7
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LI-063.1 (0-6)
12/13/2010
35.6656513
-108.500325
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
7.31
0.54
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1 LI-068.1 (0-6)
12/13/2010
35.666229
-108.500202
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
3.79 G
0.49
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1 LI-078.1 (0-6)
12/14/2010
35.6660362
-108.49979
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.5 G
0.41
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1 LI-085.1 (0-6)
12/13/2010
35.6652767
-108.499514
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
2.72 G
0.59
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1 LI-085.1 (0-6) Dup
12/13/2010
35.6652767
-108.499514
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
2.7 G
0.57
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LI-091.1 (0-6)
12/13/2010
35.665467
-108.499381
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.35 G
0.48
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LI-091.4 Dup
12/13/2010
35.665467
-108.499381
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.38 G
0.5
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1 LI-099.1 (0-6)
12/13/2010
35.6664237
-108.499261
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.85
0.51
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LI-107.1 (0-6)
12/14/2010
35.6670014
-108.499118
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.05 G
0.47
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LI-110.1 (0-6)
12/14/2010
35.6660517
-108.498975
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
0.98 LT
0.47
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LI-120.1 (0-6)
12/13/2010
35.6652921
-108.49871
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.05 G
0.49
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LI-120.1 (0-6) Dup
12/13/2010
35.6652921
-108.49871
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
0.87 LT,G
0.54
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LI-127.1 (0-6)
12/14/2010
35.6658533
-108.498576
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
4.13
0.46
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LI-127.4 Dup
12/14/2010
35.6658533
-108.498576
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
4.85
0.58
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LI-131.1 (0-6)
12/13/2010
35.6652826
-108.49844
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.21 G
0.5
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LI-140.1 (0-6)
12/13/2010
35.66566
-108.498258
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.66 G
0.5
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LI-140.4 Dup
12/13/2010
35.66566
-108.498258
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.86 G
0.68
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LI-141.1 (0-6)
12/14/2010
35.6660451
-108.498177
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
8.9 G
0.6
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1 LP-004.1 (0-6)
12/13/2010
35.664119
-108.502188
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.24 G
0.46
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LP-004.1 (0-6) Dup
12/13/2010
35.664119
-108.502188
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.35 G
0.54
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LP-009.1 (0-6)
12/13/2010
35.6639221
-108.501523
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
47.1 G
1
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LP-009.4 Dup
12/13/2010
35.6639221
-108.501523
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
42.7 M3,G
1.1
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1LP-015.1 (0-6)
12/13/2010
35.6639346
-108.501254
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
35.8 M3,G
1.2
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1LP-019.1 (0-6)
12/15/2010
35.6645068
-108.501124
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
4.9 G
0.6
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LP-020.1 (0-6)
12/13/2010
35.6639251
-108.500984
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
26.6
1
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LP-026.1 (0-6)
12/13/2010
35.6643085
-108.500718
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
12.5 G
0.7
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1LP-031.1 (0-6)
12/13/2010
35.6648889
-108.500588
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
2.23 G
0.62
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LP-037.1 (0-6)
12/13/2010
35.6645002
-108.500323
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
2.23 G
0.71
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LP-037.1 (0-6) Dup
12/13/2010
35.6645002
-108.500323
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
2.25 G
0.45
pC
/ g
CR1
C1 LP-042.1 (0-6)
12/13/2010
35.6646878
-108.500183
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
2.02 G
0.49
o
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LP-048.1 (0-6)
12/13/2010
35.6639283
-108.49991
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
3.23 G
0.79
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LP-052.1 (0-6)
12/13/2010
35.6637533
-108.499771
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.3 G
0.55
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1 LP-053.1 (0-6)
12/13/2010
35.6641186
-108.499777
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
2.97 G
0.58
pC
/g
CR1
C1 LP-053.1 (0-6) Dup
12/13/2010
35.6641186
-108.499777
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
2.19 G
0.6
o
Q.
/g
CR1
C1 LP-059.1 (0-6)
12/13/2010
35.6646908
-108.499647
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
2.3 G
0.77
O
Q.
/g
Page 18 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Sample
Sample
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Top
Depth
(inches
Bottom
Depth
(inches
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
bgs)
bgs)
CR1
C1 LP-064.1 (0-6)
12/13/2010
35.6648619
-108.499507
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.33 G
0.62
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1 LP-070.1 (0-6)
12/13/2010
35.6641079
-108.499235
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.77 G
0.57
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LP-075.1 (0-6)
12/13/2010
35.6646828
-108.499105
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
2.08 G
0.64
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1LP-081.1 (0-6)
12/13/2010
35.6643108
-108.498819
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.43
0.49
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1LP-081.1 (0-6) Dup
12/13/2010
35.6643108
-108.498819
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.43
0.41
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LW-002.1 (0-6)
12/16/2010
35.6661835
-108.503942
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.68 G
0.47
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LW-002.1 (0-6) Dup
12/16/2010
35.6661835
-108.503942
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.39 G
0.58
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1LW-013.1 (0-6)
12/14/2010
35.6652515
-108.503557
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
3.49
0.57
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LW-020.1 (0-6)
12/14/2010
35.6658232
-108.503512
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
2.36 G
0.61
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LW-022.1 (0-6)
12/15/2010
35.6644948
-108.503278
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.24
0.46
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LW-034.1 (0-6)
12/14/2010
35.6648644
-108.503012
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
2.09 G
0.62
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1LW-041.1 (0-6)
12/15/2010
35.6654339
-108.502875
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.37
0.36
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1LW-048.1 (0-6)
12/14/2010
35.6660088
-108.502742
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
2.01 G
0.48
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LW-050.1 (0-6)
12/14/2010
35.66468
-108.502583
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.87 G
0.64
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LW-062.1 (0-6)
12/14/2010
35.6650605
-108.502334
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.4
0.58
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LW-067.1 (0-6)
12/14/2010
35.6648745
-108.502187
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
7.02
0.41
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LW-069.1 (0-6)
12/14/2010
35.6656327
-108.502204
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.27 G
0.49
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LW-083.1 (0-6)
12/14/2010
35.6654455
-108.501778
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.89 G
0.49
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LW-090.1 (0-6)
12/14/2010
35.6656427
-108.501392
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.84 G
0.47
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1LW-097.1 (0-6)
12/14/2010
35.6654554
-108.500987
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
2.2 G
0.39
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1LW-104.1 (0-6)
12/14/2010
35.6656499
-108.500588
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.48 G
0.47
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
RWPR-SS-004 (0-6)
10/6/2010
35.6660068
-108.504092
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
8.9 G
0.6
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
RWPR-SS-006 (0-6)
10/8/2010
35.6658165
-108.504225
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
4.89 G
0.61
O
Q.
/g
CR1
RWPR-SS-007 (0-6)
10/8/2010
35.6656262
-108.504355
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
2.01 G
0.66
O
Q.
/g
CR1
RWPR-SS-008 (0-6)
10/8/2010
35.6656249
-108.504096
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
5.17 G
0.77
O
Q.
/g
CR1
RWPR-SS-010 (0-6)
10/6/2010
35.6654388
-108.503963
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
17.3 G
0.9
O
Q.
/g
CR1
RWPR-SS-011 (0-6)
10/7/2010
35.6652416
-108.504358
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
3.73 G
0.61
O
Q.
/g
CR1
RWPR-SS-011 (0-6) Dup
10/7/2010
35.6652416
-108.504358
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
3.54 G
0.5
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
RWPR-SS-012 (0-6)
10/7/2010
35.6652376
-108.504092
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
12.2 G
0.7
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
RWPR-SS-014 (0-6)
10/7/2010
35.6650555
-108.504222
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
3.56
0.55
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
RWPR-SS-019 (0-6)
10/7/2010
35.6646791
-108.504222
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
7.2 G
0.7
pC
/g
CR1
RWPR-SS-023 (0-6)
10/6/2010
35.6642878
-108.503953
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.67 G
0.48
pC
/g
CR1
RWPR-SS-025 (0-6)
10/8/2010
35.6640782
-108.504086
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
0.99 LT,G
0.37
o
Q.
/g
CR1
RWPR-SS-025 (0-6) Dup
10/8/2010
35.6640782
-108.504086
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.07 G
0.47
O
Q.
/g
CR1
RWPR-SS-211 (0-6)
10/7/2010
35.6652416
-108.504358
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
3.9 G
0.56
pC
/g
CR1
RWPR-SS-001 (0-6)
10/6/2010
35.6661433
-108.504248
0
6
SW6020
URANIUM
8.7
11
mg/kg
CR1
RWPR-SS-002 (0-6)
10/6/2010
35.6661419
-108.503999
0
6
SW6020
URANIUM
4.8
11
mg/kg
CR1
RWPR-SS-004 (0-6)
10/6/2010
35.6660068
-108.504092
0
6
SW6020
URANIUM
8.2
12
mg/kg
CR1
RWPR-SS-006 (0-6)
10/8/2010
35.6658165
-108.504225
0
6
SW6020
URANIUM
3.7
11
mg/kg
CR1
RWPR-SS-007 (0-6)
10/8/2010
35.6656262
-108.504355
0
6
SW6020
URANIUM
3
11
mg/kg
CR1
RWPR-SS-008 (0-6)
10/8/2010
35.6656249
-108.504096
0
6
SW6020
URANIUM
7.3
11
mg/kg
CR1
RWPR-SS-010 (0-6)
10/6/2010
35.6654388
-108.503963
0
6
SW6020
URANIUM
9.4
11
mg/kg
Page 19 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
CR1
RWPR-SS-011 (0-6)
10/7/2010
35.6652416
-108.504358
0
6
SW6020
URANIUM
2.8
11
mg/kg
CR1
RWPR-SS-012 (0-6)
10/7/2010
35.6652376
-108.504092
0
6
SW6020
URANIUM
10
11
mg/kg
CR1
RWPR-SS-014 (0-6)
10/7/2010
35.6650555
-108.504222
0
6
SW6020
URANIUM
3.3
11
mg/kg
CR1
RWPR-SS-019 (0-6)
10/7/2010
35.6646791
-108.504222
0
6
SW6020
URANIUM
6.5
11
mg/kg
CR1
RWPR-SS-023 (0-6)
10/6/2010
35.6642878
-108.503953
0
6
SW6020
URANIUM
1.3
11
mg/kg
CR1
RWPR-SS-025 (0-6)
10/8/2010
35.6640782
-108.504086
0
6
SW6020
URANIUM
0.61
10
mg/kg
CR1
RWPR-SS-211 (0-6)
10/7/2010
35.6652416
-108.504358
0
6
SW6020
URANIUM
2.8
11
mg/kg
CR1
C1LI-500 SS1 0-1.5
5/3/2011
35.6668364
-108.502316
0
18
713R11
Ra-226
10.2 G
0.6
pC
/g
CR1
C1LI-501 SS1 0-1.5
5/3/2011
35.6665962
-108.502944
0
18
713R11
Ra-226
5.51 G
0.52
o
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-400 SS1 0-1.5
4/25/2011
35.6645408
-108.501319
0
18
713R11
Ra-226
2.15 G
0.57
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-401 SS1 0-1.5
4/25/2011
35.6640736
-108.501375
0
18
713R11
Ra-226
8.2
0.6
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-402 SS1 0-1.5
4/29/2011
35.6646723
-108.5003
0
18
713R11
Ra-226
2.2 G
0.5
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-403 SS1 0-1.5
4/29/2011
35.6640345
-108.500584
0
18
713R11
Ra-226
21.4 G
0.6
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-404 SS1 0-1.5
5/1/2011
35.664222
-108.499825
0
18
713R11
Ra-226
2.66 G
0.48
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-405 SS1 0-1.5
5/1/2011
35.6640588
-108.499182
0
18
713R11
Ra-226
1.65 G
0.66
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-406 SS1 0-1.5
5/1/2011
35.6654968
-108.499143
0
18
713R11
Ra-226
1.16 G
0.4
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-406 SS1 0-1.5 Dup
5/1/2011
35.6654968
-108.499143
0
18
713R11
Ra-226
1.18 G
0.43
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-407 SS1 0-1.5
5/2/2011
35.6658597
-108.498441
0
18
713R11
Ra-226
3.52 G
0.62
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-407 SS1 0-1.5 Dup
5/2/2011
35.6658597
-108.498441
0
18
713R11
Ra-226
3.23 G
0.48
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-408 SS1 0-1.5
5/2/2011
35.6661682
-108.498101
0
18
713R11
Ra-226
3.53 G
0.49
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-700 SS1 0-1.5
4/30/2011
35.663741
-108.500407
0
18
713R11
Ra-226
1.46 G
0.48
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-701 SS1 0-1.5
4/30/2011
35.6635129
-108.500075
0
18
713R11
Ra-226
2.86 G
0.66
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-702 SS1 0-1.5
4/30/2011
35.6633178
-108.499525
0
18
713R11
Ra-226
1.33
0.46
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-703 SS1 0-1.5
4/30/2011
35.6650352
-108.499164
0
18
713R11
Ra-226
1.28 G
0.47
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-703 SS1 0-1.5 Dup
4/30/2011
35.6650352
-108.499164
0
18
713R11
Ra-226
1.16 G
0.54
O
Q.
/g
CR1
RWPR-SS-006 (1.5-1.9)
10/8/2010
35.6658165
-108.504225
1.5
1.9
713R11
Ra-226
2.15
0.52
O
Q.
/g
CR1
RWPR-SS-006 (1.5-1.9)
10/8/2010
35.6658165
-108.504225
1.5
1.9
SW6020
URANIUM
1.9
11
mg/kg
CR1
RWPR-SS-002 (1.5-2)
10/6/2010
35.6661419
-108.503999
1.5
2
713R11
Ra-226
48.5 M3
1.2
o
Q.
/ g
CR1
RWPR-SS-004 (1.5-2)
10/6/2010
35.6660068
-108.504092
1.5
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.32
0.33
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
RWPR-SS-009 (1.5-2)
10/7/2010
35.6654374
-108.504225
1.5
2
713R11
Ra-226
0.56 LT
0.37
O
Q.
/g
CR1
RWPR-SS-010 (1.5-2)
10/6/2010
35.6654388
-108.503963
1.5
2
713R11
Ra-226
2.62
0.35
pC
'g
CR1
RWPR-SS-011 (1.5-2)
10/7/2010
35.6652416
-108.504358
1.5
2
713R11
Ra-226
0.96 LT
0.48
pC
/g
CR1
RWPR-SS-012 (1.5-2)
10/7/2010
35.6652376
-108.504092
1.5
2
713R11
Ra-226
2.08
0.48
o
Q.
/g
CR1
RWPR-SS-014 (1.5-2)
10/7/2010
35.6650555
-108.504222
1.5
2
713R11
Ra-226
7.18
0.56
O
Q.
/g
CR1
RWPR-SS-014 (1.5-2) Dup
10/7/2010
35.6650555
-108.504222
1.5
2
713R11
Ra-226
6.69
0.6
pC
'g
CR1
RWPR-SS-019 (1.5-2)
10/7/2010
35.6646791
-108.504222
1.5
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.64
0.48
pC
/g
CR1
RWPR-SS-020 (1.5-2)
10/7/2010
35.6646778
-108.50396
1.5
2
713R11
Ra-226
7.7
0.7
o
Q.
/g
CR1
RWPR-SS-021 (1.5-2)
10/6/2010
35.6644876
-108.504083
1.5
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.67 G
0.51
O
Q.
/g
CR1
RWPR-SS-023 (1.5-2)
10/6/2010
35.6642878
-108.503953
1.5
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.44 G
0.5
pC
/g
CR1
RWPR-SS-211 (1.5-2)
10/7/2010
35.6652416
-108.504358
1.5
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.03
0.43
pC
/g
CR1
RWPR-SS-221 (1.5-2)
10/6/2010
35.6644876
-108.504083
1.5
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.65 G
0.49
o
Q.
/g
CR1
RWPR-SS-002 (1.5-2)
10/6/2010
35.6661419
-108.503999
1.5
2
SW6020
URANIUM
61
10
mg/kg
Page 20 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
CR1
RWPR-SS-004 (1.5-2)
10/6/2010
35.6660068
-108.504092
1.5
2
SW6020
URANIUM
2.1
10
mg/kg
CR1
RWPR-SS-009 (1.5-2)
10/7/2010
35.6654374
-108.504225
1.5
2
SW6020
URANIUM
0.82
10
mg/kg
CR1
RWPR-SS-010 (1.5-2)
10/6/2010
35.6654388
-108.503963
1.5
2
SW6020
URANIUM
5.9
10
mg/kg
CR1
RWPR-SS-011 (1.5-2)
10/7/2010
35.6652416
-108.504358
1.5
2
SW6020
URANIUM
0.97
10
mg/kg
CR1
RWPR-SS-012 (1.5-2)
10/7/2010
35.6652376
-108.504092
1.5
2
SW6020
URANIUM
2.6
10
mg/kg
CR1
RWPR-SS-014 (1.5-2)
10/7/2010
35.6650555
-108.504222
1.5
2
SW6020
URANIUM
9
10
mg/kg
CR1
RWPR-SS-019 (1.5-2)
10/7/2010
35.6646791
-108.504222
1.5
2
SW6020
URANIUM
1.3
10
mg/kg
CR1
RWPR-SS-020 (1.5-2)
10/7/2010
35.6646778
-108.50396
1.5
2
SW6020
URANIUM
5.8
11
mg/kg
CR1
RWPR-SS-021 (1.5-2)
10/6/2010
35.6644876
-108.504083
1.5
2
SW6020
URANIUM
2.2
11
mg/kg
CR1
RWPR-SS-023 (1.5-2)
10/6/2010
35.6642878
-108.503953
1.5
2
SW6020
URANIUM
1.1
11
mg/kg
CR1
RWPR-SS-211 (1.5-2)
10/7/2010
35.6652416
-108.504358
1.5
2
SW6020
URANIUM
0.96
10
mg/kg
CR1
RWPR-SS-221 (1.5-2)
10/6/2010
35.6644876
-108.504083
1.5
2
SW6020
URANIUM
3.5
11
mg/kg
CR1
RWPR-SS-003 (2-5)
10/8/2010
35.6660108
-108.504365
2
5
713R11
Ra-226
1.34 G
0.69
pCi/g
CR1
RWPR-SS-003 (2-5)
10/8/2010
35.6660108
-108.504365
2
5
SW6020
URANIUM
2.5
11
mg/kg
CR1
RWPR-SS-005 (2-6)
10/8/2010
35.6658177
-108.504495
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.72 G
0.72
pCi/g
CR1
RWPR-SS-019 (2-6)
10/8/2010
35.6646791
-108.504222
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
2.23 G
0.48
pCi/g
CR1
C1SS-026.2 (2-6)
12/15/2010
35.6641373
-108.503343
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
31.8
0.9
pCi/g
CR1
C1SS-026.2 (2-6) Dup
12/15/2010
35.6641373
-108.503343
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
28.4
0.9
pCi/g
CR1
C1SS-041.2 (2-6)
12/15/2010
35.6637671
-108.502242
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.55 G
0.43
pCi/g
CR1
C1SS-063A.2 (2-6)
12/15/2010
35.6638077
-108.500865
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
8.4 G
0.8
pCi/g
CR1
C1SS-069.2 (2-6)
12/15/2010
35.6664561
-108.500366
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.81
0.47
pCi/g
CR1
C1SS-082.2 (2-6)
12/15/2010
35.6629857
-108.499478
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.17 G
0.52
pCi/g
CR1
RWPR-SS-021 (2-6)
10/6/2010
35.6644876
-108.504083
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.19 G
0.55
pCi/g
CR1
RWPR-SS-221 (2-6)
10/6/2010
35.6644876
-108.504083
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.38 G
0.57
pCi/g
CR1
RWPR-SS-005 (2-6)
10/8/2010
35.6658177
-108.504495
2
6
SW6020
URANIUM
1.6
11
mg/kg
CR1
RWPR-SS-019 (2-6)
10/8/2010
35.6646791
-108.504222
2
6
SW6020
URANIUM
5
11
mg/kg
CR1
RWPR-SS-021 (2-6)
10/6/2010
35.6644876
-108.504083
2
6
SW6020
URANIUM
2.4
11
mg/kg
CR1
RWPR-SS-221 (2-6)
10/6/2010
35.6644876
-108.504083
2
6
SW6020
URANIUM
2.7
11
mg/kg
CR1
RWPR-SS-002 (2.5-3)
10/6/2010
35.6661419
-108.503999
2.5
3
713R11
Ra-226
17.3 G
1
o
Q.
/ g
CR1
RWPR-SS-004 (2.5-3)
10/6/2010
35.6660068
-108.504092
2.5
3
713R11
Ra-226
0.77 LT
0.49
O
Q.
/g
CR1
RWPR-SS-009 (2.5-3)
10/7/2010
35.6654374
-108.504225
2.5
3
713R11
Ra-226
0.76 LT
0.45
pC
Zg
CR1
RWPR-SS-010 (2.5-3)
10/6/2010
35.6654388
-108.503963
2.5
3
713R11
Ra-226
1.62
0.51
pC
/g
CR1
RWPR-SS-011 (2.5-3)
10/7/2010
35.6652416
-108.504358
2.5
3
713R11
Ra-226
0.63 LT
0.32
o
Q.
/ g
CR1
RWPR-SS-012 (2.5-3)
10/7/2010
35.6652376
-108.504092
2.5
3
713R11
Ra-226
1.12
0.49
O
Q.
/g
CR1
RWPR-SS-019 (2.5-3)
10/7/2010
35.6646791
-108.504222
2.5
3
713R11
Ra-226
0.87 LT
0.42
pC
/g
CR1
RWPR-SS-020 (2.5-3)
10/7/2010
35.6646778
-108.50396
2.5
3
713R11
Ra-226
3.42
0.52
pC
/g
CR1
RWPR-SS-021 (2.5-3)
10/6/2010
35.6644876
-108.504083
2.5
3
713R11
Ra-226
1.33 G
0.4
o
Q.
/g
CR1
RWPR-SS-023 (2.5-3)
10/6/2010
35.6642878
-108.503953
2.5
3
713R11
Ra-226
1.56
0.48
O
Q.
/g
CR1
RWPR-SS-211 (2.5-3)
10/7/2010
35.6652416
-108.504358
2.5
3
713R11
Ra-226
0.75 LT
0.42
pC
/g
CR1
RWPR-SS-221 (2.5-3)
10/6/2010
35.6644876
-108.504083
2.5
3
713R11
Ra-226
1.57
0.57
pC
/g
CR1
RWPR-SS-002 (2.5-3)
10/6/2010
35.6661419
-108.503999
2.5
3
SW6020
URANIUM
39
11
mg/kg
CR1
RWPR-SS-004 (2.5-3)
10/6/2010
35.6660068
-108.504092
2.5
3
SW6020
URANIUM
1.3
10
mg/kg
Page 21 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Sample
Sample
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Top
Depth
(inches
Bottom
Depth
(inches
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
bgs)
bgs)
CR1
RWPR-SS-009 (2.5-3)
10/7/2010
35.6654374
-108.504225
2.5
3
SW6020
URANIUM
0.6
11
mg/kg
CR1
RWPR-SS-010 (2.5-3)
10/6/2010
35.6654388
-108.503963
2.5
3
SW6020
URANIUM
2.4
10
mg/kg
CR1
RWPR-SS-011 (2.5-3)
10/7/2010
35.6652416
-108.504358
2.5
3
SW6020
URANIUM
0.68
10
mg/kg
CR1
RWPR-SS-012 (2.5-3)
10/7/2010
35.6652376
-108.504092
2.5
3
SW6020
URANIUM
2.2
10
mg/kg
CR1
RWPR-SS-019 (2.5-3)
10/7/2010
35.6646791
-108.504222
2.5
3
SW6020
URANIUM
1.2
10
mg/kg
CR1
RWPR-SS-020 (2.5-3)
10/7/2010
35.6646778
-108.50396
2.5
3
SW6020
URANIUM
5.3
10
mg/kg
CR1
RWPR-SS-021 (2.5-3)
10/6/2010
35.6644876
-108.504083
2.5
3
SW6020
URANIUM
3
11
mg/kg
CR1
RWPR-SS-023 (2.5-3)
10/6/2010
35.6642878
-108.503953
2.5
3
SW6020
URANIUM
1.2
11
mg/kg
CR1
RWPR-SS-211 (2.5-3)
10/7/2010
35.6652416
-108.504358
2.5
3
SW6020
URANIUM
0.63
10
mg/kg
CR1
RWPR-SS-221 (2.5-3)
10/6/2010
35.6644876
-108.504083
2.5
3
SW6020
URANIUM
3
11
mg/kg
CR1
C1 LW-002.2 (6-12)
12/16/2010
35.6661835
-108.503942
6
12
713R11
Ra-226
1.36
0.41
pC
'9
CR1
C1SS-041.3 (6-12)
12/15/2010
35.6637671
-108.502242
6
12
713R11
Ra-226
2.05
0.41
pC
/g
CR1
C1 LI-047.2 (8-14)
12/14/2010
35.6665979
-108.501549
8
14
713R11
Ra-226
7.7
0.5
o
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LI-047.2 (8-14) Dup
12/14/2010
35.6665979
-108.501549
8
14
713R11
Ra-226
8.4
0.6
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1 LW-083.2 (8-14)
12/14/2010
35.6654455
-108.501778
8
14
713R11
Ra-226
1.4
0.37
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1 LI-058.2 (9-15)
12/14/2010
35.6660344
-108.500605
9
15
713R11
Ra-226
3.51
0.39
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1 LI-068.2 (10-16)
12/13/2010
35.666229
-108.500202
10
16
713R11
Ra-226
1.71
0.47
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-019.2 (12-18)
12/15/2010
35.6645068
-108.501124
12
18
713R11
Ra-226
1.15
0.37
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LW-022.2 (12-18)
12/15/2010
35.6644948
-108.503278
12
18
713R11
Ra-226
49.5 M3
1.1
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LW-022.2 (12-18) Dup
12/15/2010
35.6644948
-108.503278
12
18
713R11
Ra-226
55.3 M3
1.2
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LW-041.2 (12-18)
12/15/2010
35.6654339
-108.502875
12
18
713R11
Ra-226
329 M3
3
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LW-041.2 (12-18) Dup
12/15/2010
35.6654339
-108.502875
12
18
713R11
Ra-226
324 M3
3
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1 LW-048.2 (12-18)
12/14/2010
35.6660088
-108.502742
12
18
713R11
Ra-226
128 M3,G
2
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1SS-026.3 (12-18)
12/15/2010
35.6641373
-108.503343
12
18
713R11
Ra-226
7.3
0.66
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1SS-063A.3 (12-18)
12/15/2010
35.6638077
-108.500865
12
18
713R11
Ra-226
1.6
0.38
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1 LI-078.2 (14-20)
12/14/2010
35.6660362
-108.49979
14
20
713R11
Ra-226
2.72 G
0.64
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LW-104.2 (14-20)
12/14/2010
35.6656499
-108.500588
14
20
713R11
Ra-226
1.31
0.4
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1 LP-037.2 (16-22)
12/13/2010
35.6645002
-108.500323
16
22
713R11
Ra-226
2.11
0.37
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1 LP-037.2 (16-22) Dup
12/13/2010
35.6645002
-108.500323
16
22
713R11
Ra-226
1.96
0.45
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LI-005.2 (18-24)
12/14/2010
35.6663944
-108.503553
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
1.9
0.44
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LI-016.2 (18-24)
12/14/2010
35.6667753
-108.502749
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
5.23
0.57
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LI-026.2 (18-24)
12/14/2010
35.6669753
-108.50235
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
4.71
0.4
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1 LI-037.2 (18-24)
12/14/2010
35.6667797
-108.501957
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
3.89
0.49
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1 LI-085.2 (18-24)
12/13/2010
35.6652767
-108.499514
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
1.59 G
0.5
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LI-091.2 (18-24)
12/13/2010
35.665467
-108.499381
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
1.48 G
0.51
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1 LI-099.2 (18-24)
12/13/2010
35.6664237
-108.499261
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
1.31
0.53
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1 LI-099.4 Dup
12/13/2010
35.6664237
-108.499261
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
1.48
0.36
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LI-107.2 (18-24)
12/14/2010
35.6670014
-108.499118
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
1.31 G
0.56
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LI-107.4 Dup
12/14/2010
35.6670014
-108.499118
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
1.19 G
0.59
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LI-107.4 Dup2
12/14/2010
35.6670014
-108.499118
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
0.81 LT,G
0.57
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LI-110.2 (18-24)
12/14/2010
35.6660517
-108.498975
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
1.17
0.48
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LI-110.2 (18-24) Dup
12/14/2010
35.6660517
-108.498975
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
0.97 LT
0.39
O
Q.
/g
Page 22 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Sample
Sample
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Top
Depth
(inches
Bottom
Depth
(inches
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
bgs)
bgs)
CR1
C1LI-120.2 (18-24)
12/13/2010
35.6652921
-108.49871
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
1.38 G
0.55
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LI-127.2 (18-24)
12/14/2010
35.6658533
-108.498576
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
2.12
0.43
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1LI-131.2 (18-24)
12/13/2010
35.6652826
-108.49844
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
0.9 LT
0.39
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1LI-140.2 (18-24)
12/13/2010
35.66566
-108.498258
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
1.37
0.48
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1LI-141.2 (18-24)
12/14/2010
35.6660451
-108.498177
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
1.86 G
0.58
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LP-004.2 (18-24)
12/13/2010
35.664119
-108.502188
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
62.6 M3,G
1.3
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LP-009.2 (18-24)
12/13/2010
35.6639221
-108.501523
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
13.5
0.7
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1LP-015.2 (18-24)
12/13/2010
35.6639346
-108.501254
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
7.45
0.51
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LP-020.2 (18-24)
12/13/2010
35.6639251
-108.500984
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
29.9
0.7
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LP-026.2 (18-24)
12/13/2010
35.6643085
-108.500718
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
22.5
0.8
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1LP-031.2 (18-24)
12/13/2010
35.6648889
-108.500588
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
3.05
0.5
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LP-042.2 (18-24)
12/13/2010
35.6646878
-108.500183
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
2.02
0.4
pC
/ g
CR1
C1 LP-048.2 (18-24)
12/13/2010
35.6639283
-108.49991
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
1.74 G
0.45
o
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LP-052.2 (18-24)
12/13/2010
35.6637533
-108.499771
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
1.54
0.46
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LP-053.2 (18-24)
12/13/2010
35.6641186
-108.499777
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
1.99 G
0.42
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LP-053.4 Dup
12/13/2010
35.6641186
-108.499777
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
1.32
0.43
pC
/ g
CR1
C1 LP-059.2 (18-24)
12/13/2010
35.6646908
-108.499647
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
2.04 G
0.56
o
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LP-064.2 (18-24)
12/13/2010
35.6648619
-108.499507
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
1.37
0.35
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LP-070.2 (18-24)
12/13/2010
35.6641079
-108.499235
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
1.9
0.37
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LP-075.2 (18-24)
12/13/2010
35.6646828
-108.499105
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
1.74 G
0.47
pC
/ g
CR1
C1LP-081.2 (18-24)
12/13/2010
35.6643108
-108.498819
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
1.17
0.38
pC
/ g
CR1
C1LW-013.2 (18-24)
12/14/2010
35.6652515
-108.503557
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
31.1
0.9
o
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LW-020.2 (18-24)
12/14/2010
35.6658232
-108.503512
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
99 M3,G
2
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LW-034.2 (18-24)
12/14/2010
35.6648644
-108.503012
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
154 M3,G
1
pC
/ g
CR1
C1 LW-050.2 (18-24)
12/14/2010
35.66468
-108.502583
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
75.6 M3,G
1.5
pC
/ g
CR1
C1 LW-062.2 (18-24)
12/14/2010
35.6650605
-108.502334
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
37.7 G
0.8
o
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1LW-067.2 (18-24)
12/14/2010
35.6648745
-108.502187
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
104
1
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LW-067.2 (18-24) Dup
12/14/2010
35.6648745
-108.502187
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
102 M3
2
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1LW-069.2 (18-24)
12/14/2010
35.6656327
-108.502204
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
38.8
1
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1LW-090.2 (18-24)
12/14/2010
35.6656427
-108.501392
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
67.8 M3
1.1
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LW-090.4 Dup
12/14/2010
35.6656427
-108.501392
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
76.4 M3
1.2
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1 LW-097.2 (18-24)
12/14/2010
35.6654554
-108.500987
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
1.82
0.43
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1SS-082.3 (18-24)
12/15/2010
35.6629857
-108.499478
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
0.93 LT
0.42
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LI-500 SS2 1.5-3
5/3/2011
35.6668364
-108.502316
18
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.03
0.51
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LI-501 SS2 1.5-3
5/3/2011
35.6665962
-108.502944
18
36
713R11
Ra-226
14.3
0.5
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-400 SS2 1.5-3
4/25/2011
35.6645408
-108.501319
18
36
713R11
Ra-226
28.7
1
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-400 SS2 1.5-3 Dup
4/25/2011
35.6645408
-108.501319
18
36
713R11
Ra-226
31.3
0.8
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-401 SS2 1.5-3
4/25/2011
35.6640736
-108.501375
18
36
713R11
Ra-226
18.5 G
0.8
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-402 SS2 1.5-3
4/29/2011
35.6646723
-108.5003
18
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.98
0.56
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-403 SS2 1.5-3
4/29/2011
35.6640345
-108.500584
18
36
713R11
Ra-226
24.3 G
0.7
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-403 SS2 1.5-3 Dup
4/29/2011
35.6640345
-108.500584
18
36
713R11
Ra-226
27.6 G
0.8
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-404 SS2 1.5-3
5/1/2011
35.664222
-108.499825
18
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.54 G
0.65
O
Q.
/g
Page 23 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Sample
Sample
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Top
Depth
(inches
Bottom
Depth
(inches
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
bgs)
bgs)
CR1
C1LP-404 SS2 1.5-3 Dup
5/1/2011
35.664222
-108.499825
18
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.78
0.43
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-405 SS2 1.5-3
5/1/2011
35.6640588
-108.499182
18
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.57
0.38
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1LP-406 SS2 1.5-3
5/1/2011
35.6654968
-108.499143
18
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.54 G
0.44
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1LP-407 SS2 1.5-3
5/2/2011
35.6658597
-108.498441
18
36
713R11
Ra-226
3.44 G
0.5
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1LP-408 SS2 1.5-3
5/2/2011
35.6661682
-108.498101
18
36
713R11
Ra-226
4.46 G
0.53
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1LP-700 SS2 1.5-3
4/30/2011
35.663741
-108.500407
18
36
713R11
Ra-226
4.8
0.49
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1LP-700 SS2 1.5-3 Dup
4/30/2011
35.663741
-108.500407
18
36
713R11
Ra-226
5.09
0.49
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-701 SS2 1.5-3
4/30/2011
35.6635129
-108.500075
18
36
713R11
Ra-226
3.14 G
0.48
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-702 SS2 1.5-3
4/30/2011
35.6633178
-108.499525
18
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.38 G
0.59
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-703 SS2 1.5-3
4/30/2011
35.6650352
-108.499164
18
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.14 G
0.58
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1 LI-005.3 (30-36)
12/14/2010
35.6663944
-108.503553
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.63
0.48
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1LI-016.3 (30-36)
12/14/2010
35.6667753
-108.502749
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
2.88
0.39
pC
/ g
CR1
C1 LI-026.3 (30-36)
12/14/2010
35.6669753
-108.50235
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.98
0.55
o
Q.
/g
CR1
C1 LI-037.3 (30-36)
12/14/2010
35.6667797
-108.501957
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
4.71
0.57
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1 LI-037.4 Dup
12/14/2010
35.6667797
-108.501957
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
5.36
0.48
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1 LI-085.3 (30-36)
12/13/2010
35.6652767
-108.499514
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.47
0.52
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LI-091.3 (30-36)
12/13/2010
35.665467
-108.499381
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.6 G
0.63
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1 LI-099.3 (30-36)
12/13/2010
35.6664237
-108.499261
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.1
0.42
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LI-107.3 (30-36)
12/14/2010
35.6670014
-108.499118
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.14 G
0.58
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LI-110.3 (30-36)
12/14/2010
35.6660517
-108.498975
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
0.84 LT
0.35
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1 LI-120.3 (30-36)
12/13/2010
35.6652921
-108.49871
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.33 G
0.48
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1 LI-127.3 (30-36)
12/14/2010
35.6658533
-108.498576
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
2.6
0.48
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LI-131.3 (30-36)
12/13/2010
35.6652826
-108.49844
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
0.89 LT
0.43
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1 LI-140.3 (30-36)
12/13/2010
35.66566
-108.498258
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.33
0.39
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LI-141.3 (30-36)
12/14/2010
35.6660451
-108.498177
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.64
0.5
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1 LP-004.3 (30-36)
12/13/2010
35.664119
-108.502188
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
45.5 M3
1.1
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LP-009.3 (30-36)
12/13/2010
35.6639221
-108.501523
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
6.89
0.52
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1LP-015.3 (30-36)
12/13/2010
35.6639346
-108.501254
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
4.62
0.43
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LP-020.3 (30-36)
12/13/2010
35.6639251
-108.500984
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
29.2
0.7
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1 LP-026.3 (30-36)
12/13/2010
35.6643085
-108.500718
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
26.5
0.7
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-031.3 (30-36)
12/13/2010
35.6648889
-108.500588
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
2.14
0.4
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1 LP-042.3 (30-36)
12/13/2010
35.6646878
-108.500183
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.65 G
0.41
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1 LP-048.3 (30-36)
12/13/2010
35.6639283
-108.49991
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.31
0.44
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1 LP-052.3 (30-36)
12/13/2010
35.6637533
-108.499771
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.81
0.57
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1 LP-053.3 (30-36)
12/13/2010
35.6641186
-108.499777
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
2.14
0.57
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1 LP-059.3 (30-36)
12/13/2010
35.6646908
-108.499647
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
2.1 G
0.58
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1 LP-064.3 (30-36)
12/13/2010
35.6648619
-108.499507
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.3 G
0.49
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1 LP-070.3 (30-36)
12/13/2010
35.6641079
-108.499235
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
6.83
0.59
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1 LP-075.3 (30-36)
12/13/2010
35.6646828
-108.499105
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.48 G
0.49
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1 LP-075.4 Dup
12/13/2010
35.6646828
-108.499105
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.69
0.47
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-081.3 (30-36)
12/13/2010
35.6643108
-108.498819
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.04
0.44
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LW-013.3 (30-36)
12/14/2010
35.6652515
-108.503557
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
38.6
0.8
O
Q.
/g
Page 24 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
CR1
C1LW-013.4
12/14/2010
35.6652515
-108.503557
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
38.7
0.9
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LW-013.4 Dup
12/14/2010
35.6652515
-108.503557
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
37.5
0.7
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LW-020.3 (30-36)
12/14/2010
35.6658232
-108.503512
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
189 M3,G
2
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LW-034.3 (30-36)
12/14/2010
35.6648644
-108.503012
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
82 M3,G
1.4
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LW-050.3 (30-36)
12/14/2010
35.66468
-108.502583
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
60.6 M3
1.2
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LW-062.3 (30-36)
12/14/2010
35.6650605
-108.502334
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
48.8 G
0.9
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LW-067.3 (30-36)
12/14/2010
35.6648745
-108.502187
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
99 M3,G
1
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LW-067.4
12/14/2010
35.6648745
-108.502187
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
98 M3,G
2
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1LW-067.4 Dup
12/14/2010
35.6648745
-108.502187
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
97 M3
1
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LW-069.3 (30-36)
12/14/2010
35.6656327
-108.502204
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
67.4 M3
1.2
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LW-090.3 (30-36)
12/14/2010
35.6656427
-108.501392
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
56.9
0.9
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LW-097.3 (30-36)
12/14/2010
35.6654554
-108.500987
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
2.25
0.42
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1LI-500 SS3 3-4.5
5/3/2011
35.6668364
-108.502316
36
54
713R11
Ra-226
1.62 G
0.62
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1LI-501 DUP 501
5/3/2011
35.6665962
-108.502944
36
54
713R11
Ra-226
1.07
0.32
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1LI-501 SS3 3-4.5
5/3/2011
35.6665962
-108.502944
36
54
713R11
Ra-226
1.14
0.4
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1LP-400 SS3 3-4.5
4/25/2011
35.6645408
-108.501319
36
54
713R11
Ra-226
2.4
0.54
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-401 SS3 3-4.5
4/25/2011
35.6640736
-108.501375
36
54
713R11
Ra-226
30.7 G
0.9
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-402 SS3 3-4.5
4/29/2011
35.6646723
-108.5003
36
54
713R11
Ra-226
3.15 G
0.44
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-402 SS3 3-4.5 Dup
4/29/2011
35.6646723
-108.5003
36
54
713R11
Ra-226
3.29
0.43
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-403 SS3 3-4.5
4/29/2011
35.6640345
-108.500584
36
54
713R11
Ra-226
16 G
0.8
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-404 SS3 3-4.5
5/1/2011
35.664222
-108.499825
36
54
713R11
Ra-226
2.92
0.4
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-405 SS3 3-4.5
5/1/2011
35.6640588
-108.499182
36
54
713R11
Ra-226
1.35 G
0.47
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-406 SS3 3-4.5
5/1/2011
35.6654968
-108.499143
36
54
713R11
Ra-226
1.62 G
0.49
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-407 SS3 3-4.5
5/2/2011
35.6658597
-108.498441
36
54
713R11
Ra-226
5.74
0.44
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-408 SS3 3-4.5
5/2/2011
35.6661682
-108.498101
36
54
713R11
Ra-226
5.54 G
0.54
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-700 SS3 3-4.5
4/30/2011
35.663741
-108.500407
36
54
713R11
Ra-226
39.1 G
0.9
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1LP-701 SS3 3-4.5
4/30/2011
35.6635129
-108.500075
36
54
713R11
Ra-226
3.94 G
0.52
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1LP-702 SS3 3-4.5
4/30/2011
35.6633178
-108.499525
36
54
713R11
Ra-226
1.2
0.43
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-703 SS3 3-4.5
4/30/2011
35.6650352
-108.499164
36
54
713R11
Ra-226
1.13 G
0.5
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-703 SS3 3-4.5 Dup
4/30/2011
35.6650352
-108.499164
36
54
713R11
Ra-226
1.13
0.41
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1 LP-020.4 (48-54)
12/13/2010
35.6639251
-108.500984
48
54
713R11
Ra-226
29.1
0.9
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1 LP-020.4 (48-54) Dup
12/13/2010
35.6639251
-108.500984
48
54
713R11
Ra-226
30
1
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1LI-501 SS10
5/3/2011
35.6665962
-108.502944
54
72
SW6010
ARSENIC
3.6
1.1
mg/kg
CR1
C1LI-501 SS4 4.5-6
5/3/2011
35.6665962
-108.502944
54
72
SW6010
ARSENIC
3.4
1
mg/kg
CR1
C1LI-501 SS10
5/3/2011
35.6665962
-108.502944
54
72
SW6010
MOLYBDENUM
1.1 U
1.1
mg/kg
CR1
C1LI-501 SS4 4.5-6
5/3/2011
35.6665962
-108.502944
54
72
SW6010
MOLYBDENUM
1 U
1
mg/kg
CR1
C1-1B008-5 (FD)
7/17/2015
35.6646504
-108.49905
54
72
Unknown
Ra-226
9.6
Unknown
pCi/g
CR1
C1-B001-5
7/13/2015
35.6660711
-108.503664
54
72
Unknown
Ra-226
0.868
Unknown
pCi/g
CR1
C1-B003-5
7/14/2015
35.6659976
-108.502431
54
72
Unknown
Ra-226
2.86
Unknown
pCi/g
CR1
C1-B006-5
7/17/2015
35.6648266
-108.50078
54
72
Unknown
Ra-226
0.59
Unknown
pCi/g
CR1
C1-B007-5
7/17/2015
35.6643482
-108.5006
54
72
Unknown
Ra-226
16.3
Unknown
pCi/g
CR1
C1-B008-5
7/17/2015
35.6646504
-108.49905
54
72
Unknown
Ra-226
1.9
Unknown
pCi/g
Page 25 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
CR1
C1LI-500 SS4 4.5-6
5/3/2011
35.6668364
-108.502316
54
72
713R11
Ra-226
2.09 G
0.43
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LI-501 SS4 4.5-6
5/3/2011
35.6665962
-108.502944
54
72
713R11
Ra-226
0.67 LT
0.41
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-400 SS4 4.5-6
4/25/2011
35.6645408
-108.501319
54
72
713R11
Ra-226
2.04
0.58
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1LP-401 SS4 4.5-6
4/25/2011
35.6640736
-108.501375
54
72
713R11
Ra-226
468 M3,G
3
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1LP-402 DUP 402
4/29/2011
35.6646723
-108.5003
54
72
713R11
Ra-226
14.9 G
0.5
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1LP-402 SS4 4.5-6
4/29/2011
35.6646723
-108.5003
54
72
713R11
Ra-226
16.2
0.6
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1LP-403 SS4 4.5-6
4/29/2011
35.6640345
-108.500584
54
72
713R11
Ra-226
59.8 M3,G
1.1
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1LP-404 SS4 4.5-6
5/1/2011
35.664222
-108.499825
54
72
713R11
Ra-226
1.84 G
0.58
O
Q.
/ g
CR1
C1LP-404 SS4 4.5-6 Dup
5/1/2011
35.664222
-108.499825
54
72
713R11
Ra-226
2.08 G
0.46
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-405 SS4 4.5-6
5/1/2011
35.6640588
-108.499182
54
72
713R11
Ra-226
1.44 G
0.63
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-406 SS4 4.5-6
5/1/2011
35.6654968
-108.499143
54
72
713R11
Ra-226
1.68 G
0.45
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-407 DUP 407
5/2/2011
35.6658597
-108.498441
54
72
713R11
Ra-226
5.89
0.61
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-407 SS4 4.5-6
5/2/2011
35.6658597
-108.498441
54
72
713R11
Ra-226
5.52
0.57
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-408 SS4 4.5-6
5/2/2011
35.6661682
-108.498101
54
72
713R11
Ra-226
6.72 G
0.64
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-408 SS4 4.5-6 Dup
5/2/2011
35.6661682
-108.498101
54
72
713R11
Ra-226
6.6 G
0.73
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-700 SS4 4.5-6
4/30/2011
35.663741
-108.500407
54
72
713R11
Ra-226
34.8 M3
1
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-701 SS4 4.5-6
4/30/2011
35.6635129
-108.500075
54
72
713R11
Ra-226
3.07 G
0.57
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-702 SS4 4.5-6
4/30/2011
35.6633178
-108.499525
54
72
713R11
Ra-226
1.54 G
0.46
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LP-703 SS4 4.5-6
4/30/2011
35.6650352
-108.499164
54
72
713R11
Ra-226
1.2 G
0.54
O
Q.
/g
CR1
C1LI-501 SS10
5/3/2011
35.6665962
-108.502944
54
72
SW6010
SELENIUM
0.53 U
0.53
mg/kg
CR1
C1LI-501 SS4 4.5-6
5/3/2011
35.6665962
-108.502944
54
72
SW6010
SELENIUM
0.52 U
0.52
mg/kg
CR1
C1LI-501 SS10
5/3/2011
35.6665962
-108.502944
54
72
SW6010
VANADIUM
11
1.1
mg/kg
CR1
C1LI-501 SS4 4.5-6
5/3/2011
35.6665962
-108.502944
54
72
SW6010
VANADIUM
9.5
1
mg/kg
CR1E
CELA-001 (0-2)
5/6/2011
35.6649477
-108.490897
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.83 G
0.53
o
Q.
/ g
CR1E
CELA-001A.1 (0-2")
12/15/2010
35.6649422
-108.490893
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.6
0.54
O
Q.
/g
CR1E
CELA-004.1 (0-2")
12/15/2010
35.6645728
-108.490624
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
2.46
0.49
O
Q.
/g
CR1E
CELA-008.1 (0-2")
12/15/2010
35.6647603
-108.490491
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.31
0.49
O
Q.
/ g
CR1E
CELA-012.1 (0-2")
12/15/2010
35.6662795
-108.490503
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
2.24 G
0.53
O
Q.
/ g
CR1E
CELA-016.1 (0-2")
12/15/2010
35.6660879
-108.490371
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
4.93
0.63
O
Q.
/ g
CR1E
CELA-020.1 (0-2")
12/15/2010
35.6655228
-108.490225
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.69
0.45
O
Q.
/ g
CR1E
CELA-024.1 (0-2")
12/15/2010
35.6653285
-108.490085
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.26
0.59
pC
/g
CR1E
CELA-027.1 (0-2")
12/15/2010
35.6664685
-108.490101
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
2.24
0.41
pC
/g
CR1E
CELA-031.1 (0-2")
12/15/2010
35.6662824
-108.489968
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
2.34
0.43
o
Q.
/ g
CR1E
CELA-035.1 (0-2")
12/15/2010
35.6660909
-108.489832
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.96
0.66
O
Q.
/ g
CR1E
CELA-039.1 (0-2")
12/15/2010
35.6662839
-108.489699
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
2.21
0.38
pC
/g
CR1E
CELA-043.1 (0-2")
12/15/2010
35.6664715
-108.489566
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
5 G
0.57
pC
/g
CR1E
CELA-047.1 (0-2")
12/15/2010
35.6666673
-108.489429
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
2.62 G
0.42
o
Q.
/ g
CR1E
CELA-051.1 (0-2")
12/15/2010
35.6659187
-108.489157
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
3.17 G
0.49
O
Q.
/ g
CR1E
CELA-054.1 (0-2")
12/15/2010
35.6661008
-108.489024
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.64
0.47
pC
/g
CR1E
CELA-058.1 (0-2")
12/15/2010
35.6666674
-108.488891
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
37.8 G
1
pC
/g
CR1E
CELA-062.1 (0-2")
12/15/2010
35.6662953
-108.488622
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
3.73 G
0.55
o
Q.
/ g
CR1E
CELA-062.1 (0-2") Dup
12/15/2010
35.6662953
-108.488622
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
3.87 G
0.48
O
Q.
/ g
Page 26 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
CR1E
CELA-062.2
12/15/2010
35.6662953
-108.488622
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
3.79 G
0.44
O
Q.
/g
CR1E
CELA-066.1 (0-2")
12/15/2010
35.6668592
-108.488485
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
2.16
0.47
O
Q.
/ g
CR1E
CELA-066.1 (0-2") Dup
12/15/2010
35.6668592
-108.488485
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.68
0.46
pC
/g
CR1E
CELA-070.1 (0-2")
12/15/2010
35.6668607
-108.488216
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
4.25 G
0.88
pC
/g
CR1E
CELA-070.2
12/15/2010
35.6668607
-108.488216
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
7.7 G
0.6
o
Q.
/ g
CR1E
CELA-074.1 (0-2")
12/15/2010
35.667244
-108.487956
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
5.95 G
0.56
O
Q.
/ g
CR1E
CESS-037.1 (0-2)
12/15/2010
35.6650409
-108.489423
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
2.24
0.45
pC
/g
CR1E
CESS-041.1 (0-2)
12/15/2010
35.6654512
-108.489254
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
8.5 G
0.9
pC
/g
CR1E
CESS-041.2
12/15/2010
35.6654512
-108.489254
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
8.1 G
0.8
o
Q.
/ g
CR1E
CESS-060.1 (0-2)
12/15/2010
35.6664792
-108.488135
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
2.41
0.39
O
Q.
/ g
CR1E
CESS-069.1 (0-2)
12/15/2010
35.6672442
-108.487414
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.34
0.44
pC
/g
CR1E
CESS-070.1 (0-2)
12/15/2010
35.6640557
-108.490229
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.6
0.37
pC
/g
CR1E
CR1E-SS05-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664557
-108.489454
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
6000
15
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS06-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665434
-108.488911
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
4700
15
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665828
-108.488623
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
4700
15
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.665828
-108.488623
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
4800
17
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS08-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666966
-108.488662
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
5300
15
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS09-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664733
-108.49064
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
8000
15
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS10-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665086
-108.490244
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
8400
16
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS11-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665393
-108.489297
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
7400
15
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS12-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665819
-108.490253
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
7600
15
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS13-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666222
-108.490271
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
5100
17
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS14-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666028
-108.489317
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
4600
15
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS15-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666507
-108.489822
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
4600
15
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS16-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666619
-108.488931
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
4000
15
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS17-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66629
-108.489
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
4600
15
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS18-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667002
-108.488124
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
4800
15
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS19-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664622
-108.490056
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
4500
15
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS19-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.664622
-108.490056
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
4800
16
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS05-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664557
-108.489454
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.051 J
0.1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS06-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665434
-108.488911
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.039 J
0.1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665828
-108.488623
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.069 J
0.1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.665828
-108.488623
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.056 J
0.11
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS08-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666966
-108.488662
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.1
0.1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS09-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664733
-108.49064
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.055 J
0.1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS10-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665086
-108.490244
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.058 J
0.1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS11-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665393
-108.489297
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.085 J
0.1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS12-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665819
-108.490253
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.23
0.1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS13-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666222
-108.490271
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.1 J
0.11
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS14-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666028
-108.489317
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.11
0.1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS15-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666507
-108.489822
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.13
0.1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS16-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666619
-108.488931
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.064 J
0.1
mg/kg
Page 27 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
CR1E
CR1E-SS17-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66629
-108.489
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.097 J
0.1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS18-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667002
-108.488124
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.091 J
0.1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS19-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664622
-108.490056
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.031 UJ
0.1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS19-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.664622
-108.490056
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.038 J
0.1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS05-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664557
-108.489454
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
6.1
0.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS06-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665434
-108.488911
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
4.5
0.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665828
-108.488623
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
3.9
0.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.665828
-108.488623
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
4.1
0.23
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS08-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666966
-108.488662
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
4
0.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS09-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664733
-108.49064
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
8
0.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS10-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665086
-108.490244
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
10
0.21
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS11-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665393
-108.489297
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
6.5
0.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS12-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665819
-108.490253
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
8.7
0.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS13-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666222
-108.490271
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
5.7
0.22
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS14-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666028
-108.489317
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
4.7
0.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS15-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666507
-108.489822
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
4.8
0.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS16-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666619
-108.488931
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
3.8
0.21
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS17-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66629
-108.489
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
4.9
0.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS18-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667002
-108.488124
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
4.8
0.21
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS19-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664622
-108.490056
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
5
0.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS19-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.664622
-108.490056
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
5.5
0.21
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS05-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664557
-108.489454
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
44
0.51
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1 E-SS06-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665434
-108.488911
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
68
0.5
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1 E-SS07-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665828
-108.488623
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
77
0.51
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1 E-SS07-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.665828
-108.488623
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
85
0.57
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1 E-SS08-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666966
-108.488662
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
80
0.51
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1 E-SS09-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664733
-108.49064
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
72
0.5
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS10-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665086
-108.490244
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
70
0.52
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS11-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665393
-108.489297
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
86
0.51
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS12-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665819
-108.490253
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
180
0.51
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS13-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666222
-108.490271
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
100
0.56
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS14-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666028
-108.489317
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
110
0.51
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS15-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666507
-108.489822
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
420
0.51
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS16-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666619
-108.488931
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
93
0.52
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS17-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66629
-108.489
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
78
0.51
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS18-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667002
-108.488124
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
160
0.52
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS19-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664622
-108.490056
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
27
0.5
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS19-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.664622
-108.490056
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
20
0.52
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS05-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664557
-108.489454
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.54
0.051
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS06-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665434
-108.488911
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.42
0.05
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665828
-108.488623
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.42
0.051
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.665828
-108.488623
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.42
0.057
mg/kg
Page 28 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
CR1E
CR1E-SS08-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666966
-108.488662
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.49
0.051
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS09-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664733
-108.49064
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.66
0.05
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS10-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665086
-108.490244
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.76
0.052
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS11-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665393
-108.489297
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.62
0.051
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS12-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665819
-108.490253
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
1
0.051
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS13-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666222
-108.490271
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.72
0.056
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS14-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666028
-108.489317
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.63
0.051
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS15-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666507
-108.489822
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.65
0.051
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS16-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666619
-108.488931
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.43
0.052
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS17-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66629
-108.489
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.56
0.051
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS18-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667002
-108.488124
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.56
0.052
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS19-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664622
-108.490056
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.44
0.05
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS19-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.664622
-108.490056
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.45
0.052
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS05-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664557
-108.489454
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.087 J
0.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS06-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665434
-108.488911
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.049 J
0.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665828
-108.488623
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.05 J
0.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.665828
-108.488623
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.052 J
0.23
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS08-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666966
-108.488662
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.075 J
0.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS09-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664733
-108.49064
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.088 J
0.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS10-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665086
-108.490244
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.071 J
0.21
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS11-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665393
-108.489297
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.14 J
0.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS12-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665819
-108.490253
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.23
0.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS13-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666222
-108.490271
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.15 J
0.22
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS14-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666028
-108.489317
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.13 J
0.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS15-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666507
-108.489822
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.14 J
0.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS16-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666619
-108.488931
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.072 J
0.21
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS17-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66629
-108.489
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.12 J
0.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS18-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667002
-108.488124
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.11 J
0.21
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS19-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664622
-108.490056
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.061 J
0.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS19-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.664622
-108.490056
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.056 J
0.21
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS05-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664557
-108.489454
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
8
1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS06-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665434
-108.488911
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
8.5
1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665828
-108.488623
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
22
1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.665828
-108.488623
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
21
1.1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS08-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666966
-108.488662
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
6.1
1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS09-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664733
-108.49064
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
8.5
1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS10-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665086
-108.490244
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
10
1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS11-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665393
-108.489297
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
10
1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS12-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665819
-108.490253
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
8.4
1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS13-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666222
-108.490271
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
5.1
1.1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS14-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666028
-108.489317
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
4.8
1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS15-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666507
-108.489822
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
5.7
1
mg/kg
Page 29 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
CR1E
CR1E-SS16-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666619
-108.488931
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
4.5
1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS17-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66629
-108.489
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
5.5
1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS18-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667002
-108.488124
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
5.8
1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS19-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664622
-108.490056
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
6.8
1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS19-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.664622
-108.490056
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
7.1
1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS05-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664557
-108.489454
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
4.6
0.51
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS06-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665434
-108.488911
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
4.5
0.5
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665828
-108.488623
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
4.6
0.51
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.665828
-108.488623
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
5.7
0.57
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS08-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666966
-108.488662
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
4.1
0.51
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS09-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664733
-108.49064
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
6.9
0.5
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS10-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665086
-108.490244
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
9.3
0.52
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS11-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665393
-108.489297
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
6.4
0.51
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS12-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665819
-108.490253
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
10
0.51
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS13-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666222
-108.490271
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
6.8
0.56
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS14-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666028
-108.489317
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
5.9
0.51
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS15-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666507
-108.489822
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
6.1
0.51
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS16-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666619
-108.488931
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
4.1
0.52
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS17-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66629
-108.489
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
5.9
0.51
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS18-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667002
-108.488124
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
5.3
0.52
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS19-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664622
-108.490056
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
3.8
0.5
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS19-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.664622
-108.490056
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
4
0.52
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS05-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664557
-108.489454
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
9.4
2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS06-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665434
-108.488911
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
7.7
2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665828
-108.488623
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
8.4
2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.665828
-108.488623
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
8.1
2.3
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS08-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666966
-108.488662
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
6.3
2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS09-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664733
-108.49064
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
13
2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS10-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665086
-108.490244
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
17
2.1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS11-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665393
-108.489297
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
14
2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS12-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665819
-108.490253
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
19
2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS13-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666222
-108.490271
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
12
2.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS14-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666028
-108.489317
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
11
2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS15-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666507
-108.489822
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
11
2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS16-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666619
-108.488931
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
6.5
2.1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS17-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66629
-108.489
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
9.8
2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS18-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667002
-108.488124
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
9.8
2.1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS19-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664622
-108.490056
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
6.8
2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS19-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.664622
-108.490056
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
7.3
2.1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS05-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664557
-108.489454
0
3
SW6020
IRON
16000
20
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS06-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665434
-108.488911
0
3
SW6020
IRON
12000
20
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665828
-108.488623
0
3
SW6020
IRON
11000
20
mg/kg
Page 30 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
CR1E
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.665828
-108.488623
0
3
SW6020
IRON
11000
23
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS08-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666966
-108.488662
0
3
SW6020
IRON
11000
20
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS09-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664733
-108.49064
0
3
SW6020
IRON
21000
20
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS10-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665086
-108.490244
0
3
SW6020
IRON
23000
21
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS11-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665393
-108.489297
0
3
SW6020
IRON
17000
20
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS12-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665819
-108.490253
0
3
SW6020
IRON
20000
20
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS13-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666222
-108.490271
0
3
SW6020
IRON
12000
22
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS14-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666028
-108.489317
0
3
SW6020
IRON
11000
20
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS15-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666507
-108.489822
0
3
SW6020
IRON
11000
20
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS16-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666619
-108.488931
0
3
SW6020
IRON
9700
21
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS17-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66629
-108.489
0
3
SW6020
IRON
12000
20
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS18-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667002
-108.488124
0
3
SW6020
IRON
11000
21
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS19-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664622
-108.490056
0
3
SW6020
IRON
12000
20
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS19-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.664622
-108.490056
0
3
SW6020
IRON
13000
21
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS05-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664557
-108.489454
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
10
0.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS06-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665434
-108.488911
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
7.8
0.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665828
-108.488623
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
7
0.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.665828
-108.488623
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
6.9
0.23
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS08-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666966
-108.488662
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
8.1
0.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS09-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664733
-108.49064
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
13
0.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS10-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665086
-108.490244
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
16
0.21
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS11-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665393
-108.489297
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
13
0.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS12-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665819
-108.490253
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
18
0.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS13-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666222
-108.490271
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
12
0.22
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS14-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666028
-108.489317
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
11
0.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS15-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666507
-108.489822
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
11
0.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS16-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666619
-108.488931
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
7.5
0.21
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS17-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66629
-108.489
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
9.9
0.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS18-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667002
-108.488124
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
9.7
0.21
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS19-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664622
-108.490056
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
7.9
0.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS19-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.664622
-108.490056
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
8.3
0.21
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS05-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664557
-108.489454
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
120
0.76
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS06-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665434
-108.488911
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
160
0.76
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665828
-108.488623
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
150
0.76
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.665828
-108.488623
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
180
0.85
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS08-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666966
-108.488662
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
140
0.76
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS09-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664733
-108.49064
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
180
0.75
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS10-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665086
-108.490244
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
190
0.79
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS11-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665393
-108.489297
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
280
0.76
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS12-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665819
-108.490253
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
290
0.76
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS13-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666222
-108.490271
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
160
0.84
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS14-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666028
-108.489317
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
160
0.76
mg/kg
Page 31 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
CR1E
CR1E-SS15-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666507
-108.489822
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
170
0.77
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS16-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666619
-108.488931
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
140
0.77
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS17-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66629
-108.489
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
180
0.76
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS18-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667002
-108.488124
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
180
0.77
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS19-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664622
-108.490056
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
130
0.76
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS19-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.664622
-108.490056
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
120
0.78
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS05-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664557
-108.489454
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.36
0.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS06-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665434
-108.488911
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.24
0.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665828
-108.488623
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.21
0.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.665828
-108.488623
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.21 J
0.23
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS08-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666966
-108.488662
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.24
0.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS09-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664733
-108.49064
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.2
0.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS10-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665086
-108.490244
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.23
0.21
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS11-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665393
-108.489297
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.37
0.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS12-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665819
-108.490253
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.4
0.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS13-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666222
-108.490271
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.19 J
0.22
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS14-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666028
-108.489317
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.25
0.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS15-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666507
-108.489822
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.4
0.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS16-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666619
-108.488931
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.19 J
0.21
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS17-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66629
-108.489
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.27
0.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS18-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667002
-108.488124
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.21
0.21
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS19-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664622
-108.490056
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.34
0.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS19-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.664622
-108.490056
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.38
0.21
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS05-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664557
-108.489454
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
9.8
2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS06-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665434
-108.488911
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
10
2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665828
-108.488623
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
20
2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.665828
-108.488623
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
20
2.3
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS08-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666966
-108.488662
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
5.7
2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS09-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664733
-108.49064
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
11
2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS10-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665086
-108.490244
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
13
2.1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS11-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665393
-108.489297
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
11
2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS12-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665819
-108.490253
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
13
2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS13-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666222
-108.490271
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
7.5
2.2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS14-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666028
-108.489317
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
7.4
2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS15-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666507
-108.489822
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
7.9
2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS16-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666619
-108.488931
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
5.3
2.1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS17-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66629
-108.489
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
7.1
2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS18-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667002
-108.488124
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
7.2
2.1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS19-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664622
-108.490056
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
7.4
2
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS19-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.664622
-108.490056
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
8
2.1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS05-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664557
-108.489454
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
1.59
0.56
pCi/g
CR1E
CR1E-SS06-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665434
-108.488911
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
6.22
0.5
pCi/g
Page 32 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
CR1E
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665828
-108.488623
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
3.21
0.48
O
Q.
/g
CR1E
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.665828
-108.488623
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
3.12
0.38
O
Q.
/ g
CR1E
CR1E-SS08-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666966
-108.488662
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
1.76
0.54
pC
/g
CR1E
CR1E-SS09-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664733
-108.49064
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
1.69 J
0.51
pC
/g
CR1E
CR1E-SS10-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665086
-108.490244
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
1.67 J
0.34
o
Q.
/ g
CR1E
CR1E-SS11-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665393
-108.489297
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
3.8 J
0.68
O
Q.
/ g
CR1E
CR1E-SS12-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665819
-108.490253
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
1.59
0.43
pC
/g
CR1E
CR1E-SS13-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666222
-108.490271
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
1.16
0.48
pC
/g
CR1E
CR1E-SS14-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666028
-108.489317
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
1.5 J
0.54
o
Q.
/ g
CR1E
CR1E-SS15-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666507
-108.489822
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
3.11
0.46
O
Q.
/ g
CR1E
CR1E-SS16-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666619
-108.488931
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
4.58
0.62
pC
/g
CR1E
CR1E-SS17-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66629
-108.489
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
13.9
0.6
pC
/g
CR1E
CR1E-SS18-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667002
-108.488124
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
1.81
0.29
o
Q.
/ g
CR1E
CR1E-SS19-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664622
-108.490056
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
1.37
0.37
O
Q.
/ g
CR1E
CR1E-SS19-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.664622
-108.490056
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
1.39
0.43
pC
/ g
CR1E
CR1E-SS05-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664557
-108.489454
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.4
1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS06-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665434
-108.488911
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.9
1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665828
-108.488623
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.3
1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.665828
-108.488623
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.1
1.1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS08-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666966
-108.488662
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.2
1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS09-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664733
-108.49064
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.6
1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS10-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665086
-108.490244
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.8
1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS11-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665393
-108.489297
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
2.1
1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS12-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665819
-108.490253
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
3.1
1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS13-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666222
-108.490271
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.8
1.1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS14-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666028
-108.489317
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
5
1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS15-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666507
-108.489822
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.8
1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS16-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666619
-108.488931
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
2.5
1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS17-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66629
-108.489
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
4.7
1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS18-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667002
-108.488124
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.6
1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS19-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664622
-108.490056
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.2
1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS19-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.664622
-108.490056
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.2
1
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS05-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664557
-108.489454
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.06 J
0.12
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS06-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665434
-108.488911
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.057 U
0.11
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665828
-108.488623
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.058 U
0.12
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.665828
-108.488623
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.065 U
0.13
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS08-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666966
-108.488662
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.058 U
0.12
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS09-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664733
-108.49064
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.063 J
0.11
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS10-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665086
-108.490244
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.081 J
0.12
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS11-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665393
-108.489297
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.076 J
0.12
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS12-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665819
-108.490253
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.089 J
0.12
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS13-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666222
-108.490271
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.064 U
0.13
mg/kg
Page 33 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
CR1E
CR1E-SS14-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666028
-108.489317
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.058 U
0.12
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS15-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666507
-108.489822
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.058 U
0.12
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS16-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666619
-108.488931
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.059 U
0.12
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS17-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66629
-108.489
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.058 U
0.12
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS18-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667002
-108.488124
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.059 U
0.12
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS19-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664622
-108.490056
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.057 U
0.11
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS19-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.664622
-108.490056
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.059 U
0.12
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS05-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664557
-108.489454
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.2
0.01
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS06-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665434
-108.488911
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.11
0.01
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665828
-108.488623
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.1
0.01
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.665828
-108.488623
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.093
0.011
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS08-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666966
-108.488662
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.099
0.01
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS09-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664733
-108.49064
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.17
0.01
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS10-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665086
-108.490244
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.2
0.01
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS11-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665393
-108.489297
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.16
0.01
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS12-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665819
-108.490253
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.22
0.01
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS13-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666222
-108.490271
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.14
0.011
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS14-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666028
-108.489317
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.13
0.01
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS15-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666507
-108.489822
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.12
0.01
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS16-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666619
-108.488931
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.084
0.01
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS17-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66629
-108.489
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.11
0.01
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS18-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667002
-108.488124
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.11
0.01
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS19-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664622
-108.490056
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.14
0.01
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS19-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.664622
-108.490056
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.16
0.01
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS05-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664557
-108.489454
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
1
0.02
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS06-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665434
-108.488911
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
5.4
0.02
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665828
-108.488623
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
2.3
0.02
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.665828
-108.488623
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
2.4
0.023
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS08-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666966
-108.488662
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
2.6
0.02
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS09-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664733
-108.49064
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
0.91
0.02
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS10-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665086
-108.490244
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
1
0.021
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS11-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665393
-108.489297
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
2.4
0.02
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS12-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665819
-108.490253
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
1.9
0.02
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS13-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666222
-108.490271
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
1.1
0.022
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS14-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666028
-108.489317
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
5.3
0.02
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS15-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666507
-108.489822
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
3.3
0.02
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS16-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666619
-108.488931
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
3.3
0.021
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS17-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66629
-108.489
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
6.3
0.02
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS18-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667002
-108.488124
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
1.4
0.021
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS19-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664622
-108.490056
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
0.83
0.02
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS19-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.664622
-108.490056
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
0.87
0.021
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS05-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664557
-108.489454
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
12
0.51
mg/kg
Page 34 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
CR1E
CR1E-SS06-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665434
-108.488911
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
13
0.5
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665828
-108.488623
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
14
0.51
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.665828
-108.488623
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
13
0.57
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS08-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666966
-108.488662
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
14
0.51
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS09-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664733
-108.49064
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
17
0.5
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS10-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665086
-108.490244
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
18
0.52
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS11-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665393
-108.489297
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
18
0.51
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS12-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665819
-108.490253
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
23
0.51
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS13-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666222
-108.490271
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
14
0.56
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS14-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666028
-108.489317
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
13
0.51
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS15-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666507
-108.489822
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
13
0.51
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS16-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666619
-108.488931
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
12
0.52
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS17-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66629
-108.489
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
15
0.51
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS18-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667002
-108.488124
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
13
0.52
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS19-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664622
-108.490056
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
11
0.5
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS19-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.664622
-108.490056
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
11
0.52
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS05-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664557
-108.489454
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
46
10
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS06-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665434
-108.488911
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
33
10
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665828
-108.488623
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
32
10
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS07-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.665828
-108.488623
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
31
11
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS08-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666966
-108.488662
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
40
10
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS09-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664733
-108.49064
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
60
10
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS10-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665086
-108.490244
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
65
10
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS11-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665393
-108.489297
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
71
10
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS12-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.665819
-108.490253
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
80
10
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS13-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666222
-108.490271
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
49
11
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS14-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666028
-108.489317
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
47
10
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS15-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666507
-108.489822
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
47
10
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS16-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.666619
-108.488931
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
36
10
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1 E-SS17-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.66629
-108.489
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
44
10
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS18-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.667002
-108.488124
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
45
10
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS19-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.664622
-108.490056
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
35
10
mg/kg
CR1E
CR1E-SS19-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.664622
-108.490056
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
36
10
mg/kg
CR1E
CELI-503 SS1 0-1.5
5/5/2011
35.6670417
-108.488182
0
18
SW6010
ARSENIC
6.2
1.1
mg/kg
CR1E
CELI-503 SS5
5/5/2011
35.6670417
-108.488182
0
18
SW6010
ARSENIC
7.2
1.3
MG/KG
CR1E
CELI-503 SS1 0-1.5
5/5/2011
35.6670417
-108.488182
0
18
SW6010
MOLYBDENUM
1.1 U
1.1
mg/kg
CR1E
CELI-503 SS5
5/5/2011
35.6670417
-108.488182
0
18
SW6010
MOLYBDENUM
1.3 U
1.3
mg/kg
CR1E
CELI-502 SS1 0-1.5
5/5/2011
35.6670954
-108.488555
0
18
713R11
Ra-226
25.5 G
0.7
pCi/g
CR1E
CELI-503 SS1 0-1.5
5/5/2011
35.6670417
-108.488182
0
18
713R11
Ra-226
14.5
0.6
pCi/g
CR1E
CELP-409 SS1 0-1.5
5/4/2011
35.6657679
-108.489458
0
18
713R11
Ra-226
2.57 G
0.66
pCi/g
CR1E
CELI-503 SS1 0-1.5
5/5/2011
35.6670417
-108.488182
0
18
SW6010
SELENIUM
2.7 U
2.7
mg/kg
CR1E
CELI-503 SS5
5/5/2011
35.6670417
-108.488182
0
18
SW6010
SELENIUM
3.2 U
3.2
mg/kg
Page 35 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
CR1E
CELI-503 SS1 0-1.5
5/5/2011
35.6670417
-108.488182
0
18
SW6020
URANIUM
73
110
mg/kg
CR1E
CELI-503 SS1 0-1.5
5/5/2011
35.6670417
-108.488182
0
18
SW6010
VANADIUM
18
5.4
mg/kg
CR1E
CELI-503 SS5
5/5/2011
35.6670417
-108.488182
0
18
SW6010
VANADIUM
21
6.5
mg/kg
CR1E
CELA-001 (2-6)
5/6/2011
35.6649477
-108.490897
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.84 G
0.65
pC
/g
CR1E
CELA-004 (2-6)
5/6/2011
35.6645728
-108.490624
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
3.07
0.57
o
Q.
/g
CR1E
CELA-004 (2-6) Dup
5/6/2011
35.6645728
-108.490624
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
3.48
0.37
O
Q.
/g
CR1E
CELA-008 (2-6)
5/6/2011
35.6647603
-108.490491
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.53 G
0.44
pC
'g
CR1E
CELA-008 (2-6) Dup
5/6/2011
35.6647603
-108.490491
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.43 G
0.53
pC
/g
CR1E
CELA-012 (2-6)
5/4/2011
35.6662795
-108.490503
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.47
0.43
o
Q.
/g
CR1E
CELA-016 (2-6)
5/4/2011
35.6660879
-108.490371
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
2.61
0.37
O
Q.
/g
CR1E
CELA-020 (2-6)
5/6/2011
35.6655228
-108.490225
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.35
0.39
pC
'g
CR1E
CELA-024 (2-6)
5/6/2011
35.6653285
-108.490085
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.71 G
0.63
pC
/g
CR1E
CELA-027 (2-6)
5/4/2011
35.6664685
-108.490101
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
2.01
0.47
o
Q.
/g
CR1E
CELA-031 (2-6)
5/4/2011
35.6662824
-108.489968
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
2.63 G
0.67
O
Q.
/g
CR1E
CELA-035 (2-6)
5/4/2011
35.6660909
-108.489832
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.63
0.54
pC
'g
CR1E
CELA-039 (2-6)
5/4/2011
35.6662839
-108.489699
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
3.19 G
0.59
pC
/g
CR1E
CELA-043 (2-6)
5/4/2011
35.6664715
-108.489566
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
75.6
0.9
o
Q.
/g
CR1E
CELA-047 (2-6)
5/4/2011
35.6666673
-108.489429
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
3.17 G
0.59
O
Q.
/g
CR1E
CELA-051 (2-6)
5/6/2011
35.6659187
-108.489157
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
2.68 G
0.56
pC
/g
CR1E
CELA-054 (2-6)
5/6/2011
35.6661008
-108.489024
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.67 G
0.49
pC
/g
CR1E
CELA-058 (2-6)
5/5/2011
35.6666674
-108.488891
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
3.08 G
0.67
o
Q.
/g
CR1E
CELA-062 (2-6)
5/5/2011
35.6662953
-108.488622
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
2.14 G
0.54
O
Q.
/g
CR1E
CELA-066 (2-6)
5/5/2011
35.6668592
-108.488485
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.64 G
0.48
pC
/g
CR1E
CELA-070 (2-6)
5/5/2011
35.6668607
-108.488216
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
19 G
0.7
pC
/g
CR1E
CELA-074 (2-6)
5/5/2011
35.667244
-108.487956
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
7.4 G
0.7
o
Q.
/g
CR1E
CELA-074 DUP
5/5/2011
35.667244
-108.487956
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
6.86 G
0.71
pC
/g
CR1E
CESS-037 (2-6)
5/6/2011
35.6650409
-108.489423
2
6
713R12
Ra-226
1.48 G
0.36
pC
'g
CR1E
CESS-041 (2-6)
5/6/2011
35.6654512
-108.489254
2
6
713R12
Ra-226
86.3 M3,G
1.6
pC
/g
CR1E
CESS-060 (2-6)
5/6/2011
35.6664792
-108.488135
2
6
713R12
Ra-226
4.34 G
0.53
o
Q.
/ g
CR1E
CESS-069 (2-6)
5/6/2011
35.6672442
-108.487414
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
2.27 G
0.5
pC
/g
CR1E
CELA-020 (6-12)
5/6/2011
35.6655228
-108.490225
6
12
713R11
Ra-226
1.52 G
0.47
pC
'g
CR1E
CELA-051 (6-12)
5/6/2011
35.6659187
-108.489157
6
12
713R11
Ra-226
89 M3,G
2
pC
/g
CR1E
CESS-041 (6-12)
5/6/2011
35.6654512
-108.489254
6
12
713R12
Ra-226
16.9
0.6
o
Q.
/ g
CR1E
CELA-074 (9-14)
5/5/2011
35.667244
-108.487956
9
14
713R11
Ra-226
3.67 G
0.52
pC
Zg
CR1E
CELA-070 (9-15)
5/5/2011
35.6668607
-108.488216
9
15
713R11
Ra-226
2.67 G
0.46
pC
'g
CR1E
CELA-004 (10-16)
5/6/2011
35.6645728
-108.490624
10
16
713R11
Ra-226
1.65 G
0.59
pC
/g
CR1E
CELA-008 (12-18)
5/6/2011
35.6647603
-108.490491
12
18
713R11
Ra-226
3.03 G
0.64
o
Q.
/g
CR1E
CELA-008 DUP
5/6/2011
35.6647603
-108.490491
12
18
713R11
Ra-226
3.56 G
0.52
o
Q.
/g
CR1E
CELA-066 (12-18)
5/5/2011
35.6668592
-108.488485
12
18
713R11
Ra-226
45.3 M3,G
1
pC
/g
CR1E
CELA-062 (13-19)
5/5/2011
35.6662953
-108.488622
13
19
713R11
Ra-226
3.7 G
0.74
pC
/g
CR1E
CELA-024 (14-20)
5/6/2011
35.6653285
-108.490085
14
20
713R11
Ra-226
1.28 G
0.44
o
Q.
/g
CR1E
CELA-001 (18-24)
5/6/2011
35.6649477
-108.490897
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
1.34
0.45
o
Q.
/g
Page 36 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
CR1E
CELA-012 (18-24)
5/4/2011
35.6662795
-108.490503
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
1.18
0.54
O
Q.
/g
CR1E
CELA-016 (18-24)
5/4/2011
35.6660879
-108.490371
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
96 M3,G
1
O
Q.
/g
CR1E
CELA-027 (18-24)
5/4/2011
35.6664685
-108.490101
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
112 M3
1
pC
'g
CR1E
CELA-031 (18-24)
5/4/2011
35.6662824
-108.489968
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
71.9 G
1
pC
/g
CR1E
CELA-031 (18-24) Dup
5/4/2011
35.6662824
-108.489968
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
71
0.8
o
Q.
/g
CR1E
CELA-035 (18-24)
5/4/2011
35.6660909
-108.489832
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
352 M3
2
O
Q.
/g
CR1E
CELA-039 (18-24)
5/4/2011
35.6662839
-108.489699
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
194 M3
2
pC
'g
CR1E
CELA-043 (18-24)
5/4/2011
35.6664715
-108.489566
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
363 M3,G
3
pC
/g
CR1E
CELA-047 (18-24)
5/4/2011
35.6666673
-108.489429
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
59.5 M3
1.2
o
Q.
/g
CR1E
CELA-047 (18-24) Dup
5/4/2011
35.6666673
-108.489429
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
58.9
0.9
O
Q.
/g
CR1E
CELA-054 (18-24)
5/6/2011
35.6661008
-108.489024
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
83.3 M3
1.1
pC
'g
CR1E
CELA-058 (18-24)
5/5/2011
35.6666674
-108.488891
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
260 M3,G
3
pC
/g
CR1E
CELA-058 DUP
5/5/2011
35.6666674
-108.488891
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
261 M3,G
3
o
Q.
/g
CR1E
CELI-502 SS2 1.5-3 Dup
5/5/2011
35.6670954
-108.488555
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
232 M3,G
2
O
Q.
/g
CR1E
CESS-037 (18-24)
5/5/2011
35.6650409
-108.489423
18
24
713R12
Ra-226
1.2 G
0.48
pC
/g
CR1E
CESS-060 (18-24)
5/6/2011
35.6664792
-108.488135
18
24
713R12
Ra-226
1.65 G
0.51
pC
/g
CR1E
CESS-069 (18-24)
5/6/2011
35.6672442
-108.487414
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
3.79 G
0.61
o
Q.
/g
CR1E
CELI-502 SS2 1.5-3
5/5/2011
35.6670954
-108.488555
18
36
713R11
Ra-226
220 M3,G
1
O
Q.
/g
CR1E
CELI-503 SS2 1.5-3
5/5/2011
35.6670417
-108.488182
18
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.24
0.5
pC
/g
CR1E
CELP-409 SS2 1.5-3
5/4/2011
35.6657679
-108.489458
18
36
713R11
Ra-226
2.05 G
0.48
pC
/g
CR1E
CESS-037 (24-30)
5/5/2011
35.6650409
-108.489423
24
30
713R12
Ra-226
1.15 G
0.54
o
Q.
/g
CR1E
CELA-039 (27-33)
5/4/2011
35.6662839
-108.489699
27
33
713R11
Ra-226
429 M3
2
O
Q.
/g
CR1E
CELA-001 (30-36)
5/6/2011
35.6649477
-108.490897
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.49
0.39
pC
/g
CR1E
CELA-012 (30-36)
5/4/2011
35.6662795
-108.490503
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.13 G
0.5
pC
/g
CR1E
CELA-016 (30-36)
5/4/2011
35.6660879
-108.490371
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
74.2 M3,G
1.1
o
Q.
/g
CR1E
CELA-027 (30-36)
5/4/2011
35.6664685
-108.490101
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
81.3 M3
1.1
pC
/g
CR1E
CELA-031 (30-36)
5/4/2011
35.6662824
-108.489968
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
151 M3,G
2
pC
/g
CR1E
CELA-031 (30-36) Dup
5/4/2011
35.6662824
-108.489968
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
128 M3,G
2
pC
/g
CR1E
CELA-035 (30-36)
5/4/2011
35.6660909
-108.489832
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
103 M3
1
o
Q.
/g
CR1E
CELA-043 (30-36)
5/4/2011
35.6664715
-108.489566
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
35.8 M3
1
pC
/g
CR1E
CELA-047 (30-36)
5/4/2011
35.6666673
-108.489429
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
123 M3,G
1
pC
/g
CR1E
CELA-054 (30-36)
5/6/2011
35.6661008
-108.489024
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
65.5 M3
1.2
pC
/g
CR1E
CESS-060 (30-36)
5/6/2011
35.6664792
-108.488135
30
36
713R12
Ra-226
2.39 G
0.51
o
Q.
/g
CR1E
CESS-060 (30-36) Dup
5/6/2011
35.6664792
-108.488135
30
36
713R12
Ra-226
1.78 G
0.55
pC
/g
CR1E
CESS-069 (30-36)
5/6/2011
35.6672442
-108.487414
30
36
713R12
Ra-226
2.9 G
0.47
pc
/g
CR1E
CELI-502 SS3 3-4.5
5/5/2011
35.6670954
-108.488555
36
54
SW6010
ARSENIC
2
1.1
mg/kg
CR1E
CELI-502 SS9
5/5/2011
35.6670954
-108.488555
36
54
SW6010
ARSENIC
2.8
1.1
mg/kg
CR1E
CELI-502 SS3 3-4.5
5/5/2011
35.6670954
-108.488555
36
54
SW6010
MOLYBDENUM
1.1 U
1.1
mg/kg
CR1E
CELI-502 SS9
5/5/2011
35.6670954
-108.488555
36
54
SW6010
MOLYBDENUM
1.8
1.1
mg/kg
CR1E
CELI-502 DUP 502
5/5/2011
35.6670954
-108.488555
36
54
713R11
Ra-226
90 M3,G
1
pCi/g
CR1E
CELI-502 SS3 3-4.5
5/5/2011
35.6670954
-108.488555
36
54
713R11
Ra-226
97 M3,G
2
pCi/g
CR1E
CELI-503 SS3 3-4.5
5/5/2011
35.6670417
-108.488182
36
54
713R11
Ra-226
1.03 G
0.6
pCi/g
Page 37 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
CR1E
CELP-409 SS3 3-4.5
5/4/2011
35.6657679
-108.489458
36
54
713R11
Ra-226
1.6 G
0.47
pCi/g
CR1E
CELI-502 SS3 3-4.5
5/5/2011
35.6670954
-108.488555
36
54
SW6010
SELENIUM
0.53 U
0.53
mg/kg
CR1E
CELI-502 SS9
5/5/2011
35.6670954
-108.488555
36
54
SW6010
SELENIUM
23
0.53
mg/kg
CR1E
CELI-502 SS3 3-4.5
5/5/2011
35.6670954
-108.488555
36
54
SW6020
URANIUM
210
1100
mg/kg
CR1E
CELI-502 SS3 3-4.5
5/5/2011
35.6670954
-108.488555
36
54
SW6010
VANADIUM
11
1.1
mg/kg
CR1E
CELI-502 SS9
5/5/2011
35.6670954
-108.488555
36
54
SW6010
VANADIUM
28
1.1
mg/kg
CR1E
C1E-1B002-5 (FD)
7/19/2015
35.6663025
-108.489642
54
72
Unknown
Ra-226
1.33
Unknown
pCi/g
CR1E
C1E-B001-5
7/18/2015
35.6658978
-108.49003
54
72
Unknown
Ra-226
0.674
Unknown
pCi/g
CR1E
C1E-B002-5
7/19/2015
35.6663025
-108.489642
54
72
Unknown
Ra-226
1.23
Unknown
pCi/g
CR1E
C1E-B003-5
7/19/2015
35.6665262
-108.489713
54
72
Unknown
Ra-226
19.2
Unknown
pCi/g
CR1E
C1E-B004-5
7/19/2015
35.6666309
-108.488707
54
72
Unknown
Ra-226
1.02
Unknown
pCi/g
CR1E
C1E-B005-5
7/18/2015
35.6660932
-108.48908
54
72
Unknown
Ra-226
50
Unknown
pCi/g
CR1E
C1E-B006-5
7/18/2015
35.6655495
-108.489476
54
72
Unknown
Ra-226
0.932
Unknown
pCi/g
CR1E
CELI-502 SS4 4.5-6
5/5/2011
35.6670954
-108.488555
54
72
713R11
Ra-226
8.1 G
0.7
pCi/g
CR1E
CELI-503 SS4 4.5-6
5/5/2011
35.6670417
-108.488182
54
72
713R11
Ra-226
1.22
0.37
pCi/g
CR1E
CELP-409 DUP 409
5/4/2011
35.6657679
-108.489458
54
72
713R11
Ra-226
1.98 G
0.48
pCi/g
CR1E
CELP-409 SS4 4.5-6
5/4/2011
35.6657679
-108.489458
54
72
713R11
Ra-226
2.14 G
0.68
pCi/g
KMP NN
KMP-13-00
7/19/2017
35.660042
-108.490344
0
2
Unknown
ARSENIC
5.3
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-14-00
7/19/2017
35.659959
-108.488751
0
2
Unknown
ARSENIC
5.2
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-14D-00
7/19/2017
35.659959
-108.488751
0
2
Unknown
ARSENIC
5.6
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-13-00
7/19/2017
35.660042
-108.490344
0
2
Unknown
BARIUM
66
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-14-00
7/19/2017
35.659959
-108.488751
0
2
Unknown
BARIUM
73
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-14D-00
7/19/2017
35.659959
-108.488751
0
2
Unknown
BARIUM
78
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-13-00
7/19/2017
35.660042
-108.490344
0
2
Unknown
CADMIUM
0.078 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-14-00
7/19/2017
35.659959
-108.488751
0
2
Unknown
CADMIUM
0.14
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-14D-00
7/19/2017
35.659959
-108.488751
0
2
Unknown
CADMIUM
0.12
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-13-00
7/19/2017
35.660042
-108.490344
0
2
Unknown
CHROMIUM
7.1
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-14-00
7/19/2017
35.659959
-108.488751
0
2
Unknown
CHROMIUM
7.5
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-14D-00
7/19/2017
35.659959
-108.488751
0
2
Unknown
CHROMIUM
8.2
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-13-00
7/19/2017
35.660042
-108.490344
0
2
Unknown
LEAD
8.6
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-14-00
7/19/2017
35.659959
-108.488751
0
2
Unknown
LEAD
11
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-14D-00
7/19/2017
35.659959
-108.488751
0
2
Unknown
LEAD
11
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-13-00
7/19/2017
35.660042
-108.490344
0
2
Unknown
MOLYBDENUM
0.5
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-14-00
7/19/2017
35.659959
-108.488751
0
2
Unknown
MOLYBDENUM
0.55 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-14D-00
7/19/2017
35.659959
-108.488751
0
2
Unknown
MOLYBDENUM
0.53 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-13-00
7/19/2017
35.660042
-108.490344
0
2
Unknown
Ra-226
2.15
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-14-00
7/19/2017
35.659959
-108.488751
0
2
Unknown
Ra-226
5.88
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-14D-00
7/19/2017
35.659959
-108.488751
0
2
Unknown
Ra-226
8.21
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-13-00
7/19/2017
35.660042
-108.490344
0
2
Unknown
SELENIUM
1.8
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-14-00
7/19/2017
35.659959
-108.488751
0
2
Unknown
SELENIUM
2.5
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-14D-00
7/19/2017
35.659959
-108.488751
0
2
Unknown
SELENIUM
2.9
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-13-00
7/19/2017
35.660042
-108.490344
0
2
Unknown
SILVER
0.5 U
Unknown
mg/kg
Page 38 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMP NN
KMP-14-00
7/19/2017
35.659959
-108.488751
0
2
Unknown
SILVER
0.49 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-14D-00
7/19/2017
35.659959
-108.488751
0
2
Unknown
SILVER
0.45 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-13-00
7/19/2017
35.660042
-108.490344
0
2
Unknown
URANIUM
0.87
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-14-00
7/19/2017
35.659959
-108.488751
0
2
Unknown
URANIUM
1.1
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-14D-00
7/19/2017
35.659959
-108.488751
0
2
Unknown
URANIUM
1.3
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-13-00
7/19/2017
35.660042
-108.490344
0
2
Unknown
VANADIUM
15
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-14-00
7/19/2017
35.659959
-108.488751
0
2
Unknown
VANADIUM
17
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-14D-00
7/19/2017
35.659959
-108.488751
0
2
Unknown
VANADIUM
17
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-SS49-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659839
-108.491057
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
6200
15
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SS49-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659839
-108.491057
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
6900
15
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SS74-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659863
-108.488353
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
5600
15
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-SS49-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659839
-108.491057
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.09 J
0.1
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SS49-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659839
-108.491057
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.065 J
0.1
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SS74-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659863
-108.488353
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.046 J
0.1
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-SS49-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659839
-108.491057
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
5.4
0.2
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SS49-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659839
-108.491057
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
5.9
0.21
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SS74-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659863
-108.488353
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
4.9
0.21
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-SS49-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659839
-108.491057
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
66
0.51
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SS49-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659839
-108.491057
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
75
0.52
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SS74-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659863
-108.488353
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
56
0.52
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-SS49-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659839
-108.491057
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.52
0.051
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SS49-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659839
-108.491057
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.56
0.052
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SS74-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659863
-108.488353
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.5
0.052
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-SS49-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659839
-108.491057
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.089 J
0.2
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SS49-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659839
-108.491057
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.085 J
0.21
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SS74-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659863
-108.488353
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.082 J
0.21
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-SS49-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659839
-108.491057
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
7.3
1
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SS49-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659839
-108.491057
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
7.8
1
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SS74-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659863
-108.488353
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
6
1
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-SS49-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659839
-108.491057
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
4.6
0.51
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SS49-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659839
-108.491057
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
5.2
0.52
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SS74-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659863
-108.488353
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
4.1
0.52
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-SS49-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659839
-108.491057
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
8.3
2
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SS49-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659839
-108.491057
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
9.3
2.1
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SS74-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659863
-108.488353
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
7.4
2.1
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-SS49-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659839
-108.491057
0
3
SW6020
IRON
14000
20
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SS49-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659839
-108.491057
0
3
SW6020
IRON
15000
21
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SS74-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659863
-108.488353
0
3
SW6020
IRON
12000
21
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SS49-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659839
-108.491057
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
9.8
0.2
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SS49-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659839
-108.491057
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
11
0.21
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SS74-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659863
-108.488353
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
9.3
0.21
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-SS49-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659839
-108.491057
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
200
0.77
mg/kg
Page 39 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMP NN
KMP-SS49-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659839
-108.491057
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
220
0.77
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SS74-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659863
-108.488353
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
190
0.77
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-SS49-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659839
-108.491057
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.36
0.2
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SS49-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659839
-108.491057
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.33
0.21
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SS74-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659863
-108.488353
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.35
0.21
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-SS49-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659839
-108.491057
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
7.7
2
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SS49-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659839
-108.491057
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
8.4
2.1
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SS74-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659863
-108.488353
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
6.8
2.1
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-SS49-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659839
-108.491057
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
4
0.49
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SS49-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659839
-108.491057
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
3.78
0.47
pCi/g
KMP NN
KMP-SS74-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659863
-108.488353
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
2.8
0.44
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-SS49-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659839
-108.491057
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.7
1
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SS49-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659839
-108.491057
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.9
1
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SS74-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659863
-108.488353
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.4
1
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-SS49-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659839
-108.491057
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.058 U
0.12
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SS49-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659839
-108.491057
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.059 U
0.12
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SS74-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659863
-108.488353
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.059 U
0.12
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-SS49-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659839
-108.491057
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.13
0.01
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SS49-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659839
-108.491057
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.15
0.01
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SS74-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659863
-108.488353
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.12
0.01
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-SS49-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659839
-108.491057
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
1.4
0.02
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SS49-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659839
-108.491057
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
1.4
0.021
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SS74-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659863
-108.488353
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
0.94
0.021
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-SS49-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659839
-108.491057
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
14
0.51
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SS49-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659839
-108.491057
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
16
0.52
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SS74-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659863
-108.488353
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
12
0.52
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-SS49-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659839
-108.491057
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
42
10
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SS49-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659839
-108.491057
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
45
10
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SS74-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659863
-108.488353
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
36
10
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-S B44-0000-0006-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.490914
0
6
SW6020
ALUMINUM
6500
16
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-S B44-0000-0006-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.490914
0
6
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.13
0.11
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-S B44-0000-0006-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.490914
0
6
SW6020
ARSENIC
5.6
0.22
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-S B44-0000-0006-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.490914
0
6
SW6020
BARIUM
82
0.55
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-S B44-0000-0006-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.490914
0
6
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.57
0.055
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-S B44-0000-0006-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.490914
0
6
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.16 J
0.22
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-S B44-0000-0006-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.490914
0
6
SW6020
CHROMIUM
7
1.1
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-S B44-0000-0006-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.490914
0
6
SW6020
COBALT
5.1
0.55
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-S B44-0000-0006-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.490914
0
6
SW6020
COPPER
11
2.2
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-SB44-0000-0006-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.490914
0
6
SW6020
IRON
14000
22
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-S B44-0000-0006-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.490914
0
6
SW6020
LEAD
13
0.22
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-SB44-0000-0006-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.490914
0
6
SW6020
MANGANESE
230
0.82
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-SB44-0000-0006-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.490914
0
6
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.42
0.22
mg/kg
Page 40 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMP NN
KM P-S B44-0000-0006-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.490914
0
6
SW6020
NICKEL
7.9
2.2
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-S B44-0000-0006-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.490914
0
6
713R15
Ra-226
9.3 J
0.8
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-S B44-0000-0006-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.490914
0
6
SW6020
SELENIUM
2.4
1.1
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-S B44-0000-0006-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.490914
0
6
SW6020
SILVER
0.062 U
0.12
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-S B44-0000-0006-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.490914
0
6
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.15
0.011
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-S B44-0000-0006-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.490914
0
6
SW6020
URANIUM
6.2
0.022
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-S B44-0000-0006-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.490914
0
6
SW6020
VANADIUM
15
0.55
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-S B44-0000-0006-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.490914
0
6
SW6020
ZINC
44
11
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SB43-0018-0024-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.491192
18
24
SW6020
ALUMINUM
6800
16
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SB43-0018-0024-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.491192
18
24
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.093 J
0.1
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SB43-0018-0024-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.491192
18
24
SW6020
ARSENIC
5.9
0.21
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SB43-0018-0024-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.491192
18
24
SW6020
BARIUM
56
0.52
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SB43-0018-0024-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.491192
18
24
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.57
0.052
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SB43-0018-0024-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.491192
18
24
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.073 J
0.21
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SB43-0018-0024-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.491192
18
24
SW6020
CHROMIUM
7.4
1
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SB43-0018-0024-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.491192
18
24
SW6020
COBALT
5.1
0.52
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SB43-0018-0024-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.491192
18
24
SW6020
COPPER
9
2.1
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SB43-0018-0024-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.491192
18
24
SW6020
IRON
15000
21
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SB43-0018-0024-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.491192
18
24
SW6020
LEAD
10
0.21
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SB43-0018-0024-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.491192
18
24
SW6020
MANGANESE
210
0.78
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SB43-0018-0024-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.491192
18
24
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.37
0.21
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SB43-0018-0024-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.491192
18
24
SW6020
NICKEL
7.8
2.1
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SB43-0018-0024-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.491192
18
24
713R15
Ra-226
2.13 J
0.61
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SB43-0018-0024-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.491192
18
24
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.3
1
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SB43-0018-0024-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.491192
18
24
SW6020
SILVER
0.06 U
0.12
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SB43-0018-0024-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.491192
18
24
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.14
0.01
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SB43-0018-0024-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.491192
18
24
SW6020
URANIUM
3.8
0.021
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SB43-0018-0024-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.491192
18
24
SW6020
VANADIUM
14
0.52
mg/kg
KMP NN
KMP-SB43-0018-0024-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.491192
18
24
SW6020
ZINC
41
10
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-S B45-0060-0066-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.490637
60
66
SW6020
ALUMINUM
6700
16
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-S B45-0060-0066-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.490637
60
66
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.088 J
0.11
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-S B45-0060-0066-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.490637
60
66
SW6020
ARSENIC
5.7
0.21
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-S B45-0060-0066-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.490637
60
66
SW6020
BARIUM
74
0.53
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-S B45-0060-0066-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.490637
60
66
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.55
0.053
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-S B45-0060-0066-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.490637
60
66
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.06 J
0.21
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-S B45-0060-0066-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.490637
60
66
SW6020
CHROMIUM
7
1.1
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-S B45-0060-0066-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.490637
60
66
SW6020
COBALT
5.1
0.53
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-S B45-0060-0066-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.490637
60
66
SW6020
COPPER
8.1
2.1
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-S B45-0060-0066-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.490637
60
66
SW6020
IRON
14000
21
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-S B45-0060-0066-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.490637
60
66
SW6020
LEAD
9.5
0.21
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-S B45-0060-0066-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.490637
60
66
SW6020
MANGANESE
220
0.79
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-S B45-0060-0066-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.490637
60
66
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.36
0.21
mg/kg
Page 41 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMP NN
KM P-S B45-0060-0066-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.490637
60
66
SW6020
NICKEL
7.7
2.1
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-S B45-0060-0066-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.490637
60
66
713R15
Ra-226
1.46 J
0.61
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-S B45-0060-0066-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.490637
60
66
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.2
1.1
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-S B45-0060-0066-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.490637
60
66
SW6020
SILVER
0.06 U
0.12
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-S B45-0060-0066-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.490637
60
66
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.14
0.011
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-S B45-0060-0066-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.490637
60
66
SW6020
URANIUM
0.64
0.021
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-S B45-0060-0066-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.490637
60
66
SW6020
VANADIUM
14
0.53
mg/kg
KMP NN
KM P-S B45-0060-0066-01
6/8/2022
35.659847
-108.490637
60
66
SW6020
ZINC
39
11
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-01-00
7/18/2017
35.659423
-108.492172
0
2
Unknown
ARSENIC
6.9
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-02-00
7/18/2017
35.659438
-108.491379
0
2
Unknown
ARSENIC
5.2
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-03-00
7/18/2017
35.65946
-108.490578
0
2
Unknown
ARSENIC
4.5
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-04-00
7/18/2017
35.65878
-108.49234
0
2
Unknown
ARSENIC
7
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-05-00
7/18/2017
35.658795
-108.491547
0
2
Unknown
ARSENIC
4.7
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-06-00
7/18/2017
35.658817
-108.490746
0
2
Unknown
ARSENIC
4.5
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-07-00
7/18/2017
35.658175
-108.492052
0
2
Unknown
ARSENIC
9.2
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-08-00
7/18/2017
35.65819
-108.491259
0
2
Unknown
ARSENIC
4.8
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-09-00
7/18/2017
35.658213
-108.490459
0
2
Unknown
ARSENIC
5.3
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-10-00
7/18/2017
35.65764
-108.490873
0
2
Unknown
ARSENIC
5.2
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-15-00
7/18/2017
35.659695
-108.491137
0
2
Unknown
ARSENIC
5
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-16-00
7/18/2017
35.658292
-108.491842
0
2
Unknown
ARSENIC
7.2
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-16D-00
7/18/2017
35.658292
-108.491842
0
2
Unknown
ARSENIC
7.5
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-17-00
7/19/2017
35.658397
-108.491778
0
2
Unknown
ARSENIC
7.6
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-18-00
7/19/2017
35.658584
-108.491524
0
2
Unknown
ARSENIC
6.6
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-18D-00
7/19/2017
35.658584
-108.491524
0
2
Unknown
ARSENIC
6.5
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-19-00
7/19/2017
35.65865
-108.491373
0
2
Unknown
ARSENIC
5.3
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-20-00
7/19/2017
35.658809
-108.491224
0
2
Unknown
ARSENIC
5.7
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-21-00
7/19/2017
35.658901
-108.491165
0
2
Unknown
ARSENIC
4.9
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-22-00
7/19/2017
35.658405
-108.490563
0
2
Unknown
ARSENIC
4.9
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-23-00
7/18/2017
35.658984
-108.490548
0
2
Unknown
ARSENIC
6
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-01-00
7/18/2017
35.659423
-108.492172
0
2
Unknown
BARIUM
87
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-02-00
7/18/2017
35.659438
-108.491379
0
2
Unknown
BARIUM
140
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-03-00
7/18/2017
35.65946
-108.490578
0
2
Unknown
BARIUM
55
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-04-00
7/18/2017
35.65878
-108.49234
0
2
Unknown
BARIUM
90
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-05-00
7/18/2017
35.658795
-108.491547
0
2
Unknown
BARIUM
50
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-06-00
7/18/2017
35.658817
-108.490746
0
2
Unknown
BARIUM
51
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-07-00
7/18/2017
35.658175
-108.492052
0
2
Unknown
BARIUM
100
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-08-00
7/18/2017
35.65819
-108.491259
0
2
Unknown
BARIUM
55
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-09-00
7/18/2017
35.658213
-108.490459
0
2
Unknown
BARIUM
65
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-10-00
7/18/2017
35.65764
-108.490873
0
2
Unknown
BARIUM
92
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-15-00
7/18/2017
35.659695
-108.491137
0
2
Unknown
BARIUM
73
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-16-00
7/18/2017
35.658292
-108.491842
0
2
Unknown
BARIUM
89
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-16D-00
7/18/2017
35.658292
-108.491842
0
2
Unknown
BARIUM
86
Unknown
mg/kg
Page 42 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMPUNC
KMP-17-00
7/19/2017
35.658397
-108.491778
0
2
Unknown
BARIUM
120
Unknown
mg/kg
KMPUNC
KMP-18-00
7/19/2017
35.658584
-108.491524
0
2
Unknown
BARIUM
90
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-18D-00
7/19/2017
35.658584
-108.491524
0
2
Unknown
BARIUM
89
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-19-00
7/19/2017
35.65865
-108.491373
0
2
Unknown
BARIUM
74
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-20-00
7/19/2017
35.658809
-108.491224
0
2
Unknown
BARIUM
74
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-21-00
7/19/2017
35.658901
-108.491165
0
2
Unknown
BARIUM
52
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-22-00
7/19/2017
35.658405
-108.490563
0
2
Unknown
BARIUM
51
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-23-00
7/18/2017
35.658984
-108.490548
0
2
Unknown
BARIUM
63
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-01-00
7/18/2017
35.659423
-108.492172
0
2
Unknown
CADMIUM
0.12 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-02-00
7/18/2017
35.659438
-108.491379
0
2
Unknown
CADMIUM
0.12 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-03-00
7/18/2017
35.65946
-108.490578
0
2
Unknown
CADMIUM
0.075 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-04-00
7/18/2017
35.65878
-108.49234
0
2
Unknown
CADMIUM
0.12 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-05-00
7/18/2017
35.658795
-108.491547
0
2
Unknown
CADMIUM
0.072 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-06-00
7/18/2017
35.658817
-108.490746
0
2
Unknown
CADMIUM
0.12 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-07-00
7/18/2017
35.658175
-108.492052
0
2
Unknown
CADMIUM
0.14
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-08-00
7/18/2017
35.65819
-108.491259
0
2
Unknown
CADMIUM
0.069 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-09-00
7/18/2017
35.658213
-108.490459
0
2
Unknown
CADMIUM
0.087 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-10-00
7/18/2017
35.65764
-108.490873
0
2
Unknown
CADMIUM
0.096 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-15-00
7/18/2017
35.659695
-108.491137
0
2
Unknown
CADMIUM
0.13
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-16-00
7/18/2017
35.658292
-108.491842
0
2
Unknown
CADMIUM
0.12
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-16D-00
7/18/2017
35.658292
-108.491842
0
2
Unknown
CADMIUM
0.14
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-17-00
7/19/2017
35.658397
-108.491778
0
2
Unknown
CADMIUM
0.14
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-18-00
7/19/2017
35.658584
-108.491524
0
2
Unknown
CADMIUM
0.15
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-18D-00
7/19/2017
35.658584
-108.491524
0
2
Unknown
CADMIUM
0.14
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-19-00
7/19/2017
35.65865
-108.491373
0
2
Unknown
CADMIUM
0.08 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-20-00
7/19/2017
35.658809
-108.491224
0
2
Unknown
CADMIUM
0.098 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-21-00
7/19/2017
35.658901
-108.491165
0
2
Unknown
CADMIUM
0.059 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-22-00
7/19/2017
35.658405
-108.490563
0
2
Unknown
CADMIUM
0.12 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-23-00
7/18/2017
35.658984
-108.490548
0
2
Unknown
CADMIUM
0.11 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-01-00
7/18/2017
35.659423
-108.492172
0
2
Unknown
CHROMIUM
8.7
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-02-00
7/18/2017
35.659438
-108.491379
0
2
Unknown
CHROMIUM
7.1
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-03-00
7/18/2017
35.65946
-108.490578
0
2
Unknown
CHROMIUM
6.6
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-04-00
7/18/2017
35.65878
-108.49234
0
2
Unknown
CHROMIUM
9.5
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-05-00
7/18/2017
35.658795
-108.491547
0
2
Unknown
CHROMIUM
7.3
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-06-00
7/18/2017
35.658817
-108.490746
0
2
Unknown
CHROMIUM
6.9
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-07-00
7/18/2017
35.658175
-108.492052
0
2
Unknown
CHROMIUM
12
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-08-00
7/18/2017
35.65819
-108.491259
0
2
Unknown
CHROMIUM
6.8
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-09-00
7/18/2017
35.658213
-108.490459
0
2
Unknown
CHROMIUM
8.3
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-10-00
7/18/2017
35.65764
-108.490873
0
2
Unknown
CHROMIUM
6.9
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-15-00
7/18/2017
35.659695
-108.491137
0
2
Unknown
CHROMIUM
7.8
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-16-00
7/18/2017
35.658292
-108.491842
0
2
Unknown
CHROMIUM
9.9
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-16D-00
7/18/2017
35.658292
-108.491842
0
2
Unknown
CHROMIUM
9.8
Unknown
mg/kg
Page 43 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMPUNC
KMP-17-00
7/19/2017
35.658397
-108.491778
0
2
Unknown
CHROMIUM
8.5
Unknown
mg/kg
KMPUNC
KMP-18-00
7/19/2017
35.658584
-108.491524
0
2
Unknown
CHROMIUM
10
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-18D-00
7/19/2017
35.658584
-108.491524
0
2
Unknown
CHROMIUM
9.5
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-19-00
7/19/2017
35.65865
-108.491373
0
2
Unknown
CHROMIUM
7.2
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-20-00
7/19/2017
35.658809
-108.491224
0
2
Unknown
CHROMIUM
8
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-21-00
7/19/2017
35.658901
-108.491165
0
2
Unknown
CHROMIUM
7
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-22-00
7/19/2017
35.658405
-108.490563
0
2
Unknown
CHROMIUM
7
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-23-00
7/18/2017
35.658984
-108.490548
0
2
Unknown
CHROMIUM
7.6
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-01-00
7/18/2017
35.659423
-108.492172
0
2
Unknown
LEAD
12
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-02-00
7/18/2017
35.659438
-108.491379
0
2
Unknown
LEAD
8.3
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-03-00
7/18/2017
35.65946
-108.490578
0
2
Unknown
LEAD
8.6
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-04-00
7/18/2017
35.65878
-108.49234
0
2
Unknown
LEAD
13
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-05-00
7/18/2017
35.658795
-108.491547
0
2
Unknown
LEAD
8.5
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-06-00
7/18/2017
35.658817
-108.490746
0
2
Unknown
LEAD
7.7
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-07-00
7/18/2017
35.658175
-108.492052
0
2
Unknown
LEAD
17
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-08-00
7/18/2017
35.65819
-108.491259
0
2
Unknown
LEAD
10
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-09-00
7/18/2017
35.658213
-108.490459
0
2
Unknown
LEAD
9.9
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-10-00
7/18/2017
35.65764
-108.490873
0
2
Unknown
LEAD
8.9
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-15-00
7/18/2017
35.659695
-108.491137
0
2
Unknown
LEAD
11
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-16-00
7/18/2017
35.658292
-108.491842
0
2
Unknown
LEAD
14
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-16D-00
7/18/2017
35.658292
-108.491842
0
2
Unknown
LEAD
13
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-17-00
7/19/2017
35.658397
-108.491778
0
2
Unknown
LEAD
13
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-18-00
7/19/2017
35.658584
-108.491524
0
2
Unknown
LEAD
14
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-18D-00
7/19/2017
35.658584
-108.491524
0
2
Unknown
LEAD
14
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-19-00
7/19/2017
35.65865
-108.491373
0
2
Unknown
LEAD
10
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-20-00
7/19/2017
35.658809
-108.491224
0
2
Unknown
LEAD
11
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-21-00
7/19/2017
35.658901
-108.491165
0
2
Unknown
LEAD
8.7
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-22-00
7/19/2017
35.658405
-108.490563
0
2
Unknown
LEAD
8.1
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-23-00
7/18/2017
35.658984
-108.490548
0
2
Unknown
LEAD
9.6
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-01-00
7/18/2017
35.659423
-108.492172
0
2
Unknown
MOLYBDENUM
0.69 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-02-00
7/18/2017
35.659438
-108.491379
0
2
Unknown
MOLYBDENUM
0.52 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-03-00
7/18/2017
35.65946
-108.490578
0
2
Unknown
MOLYBDENUM
1.3 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-04-00
7/18/2017
35.65878
-108.49234
0
2
Unknown
MOLYBDENUM
0.57
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-05-00
7/18/2017
35.658795
-108.491547
0
2
Unknown
MOLYBDENUM
1.3 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-06-00
7/18/2017
35.658817
-108.490746
0
2
Unknown
MOLYBDENUM
0.52 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-07-00
7/18/2017
35.658175
-108.492052
0
2
Unknown
MOLYBDENUM
0.65 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-08-00
7/18/2017
35.65819
-108.491259
0
2
Unknown
MOLYBDENUM
1.2 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-09-00
7/18/2017
35.658213
-108.490459
0
2
Unknown
MOLYBDENUM
0.93 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-10-00
7/18/2017
35.65764
-108.490873
0
2
Unknown
MOLYBDENUM
0.51 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-15-00
7/18/2017
35.659695
-108.491137
0
2
Unknown
MOLYBDENUM
0.65 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-16-00
7/18/2017
35.658292
-108.491842
0
2
Unknown
MOLYBDENUM
0.64 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-16D-00
7/18/2017
35.658292
-108.491842
0
2
Unknown
MOLYBDENUM
0.75 J
Unknown
mg/kg
Page 44 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMPUNC
KMP-17-00
7/19/2017
35.658397
-108.491778
0
2
Unknown
MOLYBDENUM
0.65 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMPUNC
KMP-18-00
7/19/2017
35.658584
-108.491524
0
2
Unknown
MOLYBDENUM
0.74 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-18D-00
7/19/2017
35.658584
-108.491524
0
2
Unknown
MOLYBDENUM
0.7 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-19-00
7/19/2017
35.65865
-108.491373
0
2
Unknown
MOLYBDENUM
0.7 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-20-00
7/19/2017
35.658809
-108.491224
0
2
Unknown
MOLYBDENUM
0.61 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-21-00
7/19/2017
35.658901
-108.491165
0
2
Unknown
MOLYBDENUM
0.54 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-22-00
7/19/2017
35.658405
-108.490563
0
2
Unknown
MOLYBDENUM
1.2 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-23-00
7/18/2017
35.658984
-108.490548
0
2
Unknown
MOLYBDENUM
0.8 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-01-00
7/18/2017
35.659423
-108.492172
0
2
Unknown
Ra-226
3.06
Unknown
o
Q.
/ g
KMP UNC
KMP-02-00
7/18/2017
35.659438
-108.491379
0
2
Unknown
Ra-226
1.41
Unknown
O
Q.
/g
KMP UNC
KMP-03-00
7/18/2017
35.65946
-108.490578
0
2
Unknown
Ra-226
8.32
Unknown
pC
Zg
KMP UNC
KMP-04-00
7/18/2017
35.65878
-108.49234
0
2
Unknown
Ra-226
2.67
Unknown
pC
/g
KMP UNC
KMP-05-00
7/18/2017
35.658795
-108.491547
0
2
Unknown
Ra-226
2.92
Unknown
o
Q.
/g
KMP UNC
KMP-06-00
7/18/2017
35.658817
-108.490746
0
2
Unknown
Ra-226
2.22
Unknown
O
Q.
/g
KMP UNC
KMP-07-00
7/18/2017
35.658175
-108.492052
0
2
Unknown
Ra-226
6.45
Unknown
pC
/g
KMP UNC
KMP-08-00
7/18/2017
35.65819
-108.491259
0
2
Unknown
Ra-226
5.36
Unknown
pC
/g
KMP UNC
KMP-09-00
7/18/2017
35.658213
-108.490459
0
2
Unknown
Ra-226
7.42
Unknown
o
Q.
/g
KMP UNC
KMP-10-00
7/18/2017
35.65764
-108.490873
0
2
Unknown
Ra-226
7.77
Unknown
O
Q.
/g
KMP UNC
KMP-15-00
7/18/2017
35.659695
-108.491137
0
2
Unknown
Ra-226
22.84
Unknown
pC
/g
KMP UNC
KMP-16-00
7/18/2017
35.658292
-108.491842
0
2
Unknown
Ra-226
6.67
Unknown
pC
/g
KMP UNC
KMP-16D-00
7/18/2017
35.658292
-108.491842
0
2
Unknown
Ra-226
4.71
Unknown
o
Q.
/g
KMP UNC
KMP-17-00
7/19/2017
35.658397
-108.491778
0
2
Unknown
Ra-226
48.54
Unknown
O
Q.
/g
KMP UNC
KMP-18-00
7/19/2017
35.658584
-108.491524
0
2
Unknown
Ra-226
15.38
Unknown
pC
/g
KMP UNC
KMP-18D-00
7/19/2017
35.658584
-108.491524
0
2
Unknown
Ra-226
16.44
Unknown
pC
/g
KMP UNC
KMP-19-00
7/19/2017
35.65865
-108.491373
0
2
Unknown
Ra-226
26.04
Unknown
o
Q.
/g
KMP UNC
KMP-20-00
7/19/2017
35.658809
-108.491224
0
2
Unknown
Ra-226
13.7
Unknown
O
Q.
/g
KMP UNC
KMP-21-00
7/19/2017
35.658901
-108.491165
0
2
Unknown
Ra-226
4.43
Unknown
pC
/g
KMP UNC
KMP-22-00
7/19/2017
35.658405
-108.490563
0
2
Unknown
Ra-226
4.35
Unknown
pC
/g
KMP UNC
KMP-23-00
7/18/2017
35.658984
-108.490548
0
2
Unknown
Ra-226
3.73
Unknown
o
Q.
/g
KMP UNC
KMP-01-00
7/18/2017
35.659423
-108.492172
0
2
Unknown
SELENIUM
2.7
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-02-00
7/18/2017
35.659438
-108.491379
0
2
Unknown
SELENIUM
1.6
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-03-00
7/18/2017
35.65946
-108.490578
0
2
Unknown
SELENIUM
3.1
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-04-00
7/18/2017
35.65878
-108.49234
0
2
Unknown
SELENIUM
1.8
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-05-00
7/18/2017
35.658795
-108.491547
0
2
Unknown
SELENIUM
1.8
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-06-00
7/18/2017
35.658817
-108.490746
0
2
Unknown
SELENIUM
2
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-07-00
7/18/2017
35.658175
-108.492052
0
2
Unknown
SELENIUM
3.3
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-08-00
7/18/2017
35.65819
-108.491259
0
2
Unknown
SELENIUM
2.6
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-09-00
7/18/2017
35.658213
-108.490459
0
2
Unknown
SELENIUM
5
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-10-00
7/18/2017
35.65764
-108.490873
0
2
Unknown
SELENIUM
3.6
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-15-00
7/18/2017
35.659695
-108.491137
0
2
Unknown
SELENIUM
6.6
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-16-00
7/18/2017
35.658292
-108.491842
0
2
Unknown
SELENIUM
3.8
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-16D-00
7/18/2017
35.658292
-108.491842
0
2
Unknown
SELENIUM
3.7
Unknown
mg/kg
Page 45 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMPUNC
KMP-17-00
7/19/2017
35.658397
-108.491778
0
2
Unknown
SELENIUM
21
Unknown
mg/kg
KMPUNC
KMP-18-00
7/19/2017
35.658584
-108.491524
0
2
Unknown
SELENIUM
5.6
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-18D-00
7/19/2017
35.658584
-108.491524
0
2
Unknown
SELENIUM
5.5
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-19-00
7/19/2017
35.65865
-108.491373
0
2
Unknown
SELENIUM
00
CO
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-20-00
7/19/2017
35.658809
-108.491224
0
2
Unknown
SELENIUM
6.2
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-21-00
7/19/2017
35.658901
-108.491165
0
2
Unknown
SELENIUM
2.5
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-22-00
7/19/2017
35.658405
-108.490563
0
2
Unknown
SELENIUM
2
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-23-00
7/18/2017
35.658984
-108.490548
0
2
Unknown
SELENIUM
1.9
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-01-00
7/18/2017
35.659423
-108.492172
0
2
Unknown
SILVER
0.53 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-02-00
7/18/2017
35.659438
-108.491379
0
2
Unknown
SILVER
0.5 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-03-00
7/18/2017
35.65946
-108.490578
0
2
Unknown
SILVER
0.53 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-04-00
7/18/2017
35.65878
-108.49234
0
2
Unknown
SILVER
0.21 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-05-00
7/18/2017
35.658795
-108.491547
0
2
Unknown
SILVER
0.52 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-06-00
7/18/2017
35.658817
-108.490746
0
2
Unknown
SILVER
0.49 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-07-00
7/18/2017
35.658175
-108.492052
0
2
Unknown
SILVER
0.58 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-08-00
7/18/2017
35.65819
-108.491259
0
2
Unknown
SILVER
0.49 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-09-00
7/18/2017
35.658213
-108.490459
0
2
Unknown
SILVER
0.56 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-10-00
7/18/2017
35.65764
-108.490873
0
2
Unknown
SILVER
0.51 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-15-00
7/18/2017
35.659695
-108.491137
0
2
Unknown
SILVER
0.51 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-16-00
7/18/2017
35.658292
-108.491842
0
2
Unknown
SILVER
0.5 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-16D-00
7/18/2017
35.658292
-108.491842
0
2
Unknown
SILVER
0.52 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-17-00
7/19/2017
35.658397
-108.491778
0
2
Unknown
SILVER
0.45 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-18-00
7/19/2017
35.658584
-108.491524
0
2
Unknown
SILVER
0.49 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-18D-00
7/19/2017
35.658584
-108.491524
0
2
Unknown
SILVER
0.46 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-19-00
7/19/2017
35.65865
-108.491373
0
2
Unknown
SILVER
0.46 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-20-00
7/19/2017
35.658809
-108.491224
0
2
Unknown
SILVER
0.5 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-21-00
7/19/2017
35.658901
-108.491165
0
2
Unknown
SILVER
0.45 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-22-00
7/19/2017
35.658405
-108.490563
0
2
Unknown
SILVER
0.48 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-23-00
7/18/2017
35.658984
-108.490548
0
2
Unknown
SILVER
0.51 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-01-00
7/18/2017
35.659423
-108.492172
0
2
Unknown
URANIUM
2.6
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-02-00
7/18/2017
35.659438
-108.491379
0
2
Unknown
URANIUM
9.7
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-03-00
7/18/2017
35.65946
-108.490578
0
2
Unknown
URANIUM
3.5
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-04-00
7/18/2017
35.65878
-108.49234
0
2
Unknown
URANIUM
1.3
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-05-00
7/18/2017
35.658795
-108.491547
0
2
Unknown
URANIUM
1.4
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-06-00
7/18/2017
35.658817
-108.490746
0
2
Unknown
URANIUM
2.8
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-07-00
7/18/2017
35.658175
-108.492052
0
2
Unknown
URANIUM
2.9
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-08-00
7/18/2017
35.65819
-108.491259
0
2
Unknown
URANIUM
2.1
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-09-00
7/18/2017
35.658213
-108.490459
0
2
Unknown
URANIUM
13
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-10-00
7/18/2017
35.65764
-108.490873
0
2
Unknown
URANIUM
4.2
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-15-00
7/18/2017
35.659695
-108.491137
0
2
Unknown
URANIUM
13
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-16-00
7/18/2017
35.658292
-108.491842
0
2
Unknown
URANIUM
3.6
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-16D-00
7/18/2017
35.658292
-108.491842
0
2
Unknown
URANIUM
3.1
Unknown
mg/kg
Page 46 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMPUNC
KMP-17-00
7/19/2017
35.658397
-108.491778
0
2
Unknown
URANIUM
40
Unknown
mg/kg
KMPUNC
KMP-18-00
7/19/2017
35.658584
-108.491524
0
2
Unknown
URANIUM
11
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-18D-00
7/19/2017
35.658584
-108.491524
0
2
Unknown
URANIUM
13
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-19-00
7/19/2017
35.65865
-108.491373
0
2
Unknown
URANIUM
18
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-20-00
7/19/2017
35.658809
-108.491224
0
2
Unknown
URANIUM
12
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-21-00
7/19/2017
35.658901
-108.491165
0
2
Unknown
URANIUM
4.8
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-22-00
7/19/2017
35.658405
-108.490563
0
2
Unknown
URANIUM
3.5
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-23-00
7/18/2017
35.658984
-108.490548
0
2
Unknown
URANIUM
2.8
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-01-00
7/18/2017
35.659423
-108.492172
0
2
Unknown
VANADIUM
21
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-02-00
7/18/2017
35.659438
-108.491379
0
2
Unknown
VANADIUM
16
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-03-00
7/18/2017
35.65946
-108.490578
0
2
Unknown
VANADIUM
16
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-04-00
7/18/2017
35.65878
-108.49234
0
2
Unknown
VANADIUM
21
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-05-00
7/18/2017
35.658795
-108.491547
0
2
Unknown
VANADIUM
17
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-06-00
7/18/2017
35.658817
-108.490746
0
2
Unknown
VANADIUM
16
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-07-00
7/18/2017
35.658175
-108.492052
0
2
Unknown
VANADIUM
26
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-08-00
7/18/2017
35.65819
-108.491259
0
2
Unknown
VANADIUM
17
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-09-00
7/18/2017
35.658213
-108.490459
0
2
Unknown
VANADIUM
22
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-10-00
7/18/2017
35.65764
-108.490873
0
2
Unknown
VANADIUM
18
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-15-00
7/18/2017
35.659695
-108.491137
0
2
Unknown
VANADIUM
23
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-16-00
7/18/2017
35.658292
-108.491842
0
2
Unknown
VANADIUM
23
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-16D-00
7/18/2017
35.658292
-108.491842
0
2
Unknown
VANADIUM
22
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-17-00
7/19/2017
35.658397
-108.491778
0
2
Unknown
VANADIUM
41
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-18-00
7/19/2017
35.658584
-108.491524
0
2
Unknown
VANADIUM
25
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-18D-00
7/19/2017
35.658584
-108.491524
0
2
Unknown
VANADIUM
24
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-19-00
7/19/2017
35.65865
-108.491373
0
2
Unknown
VANADIUM
26
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-20-00
7/19/2017
35.658809
-108.491224
0
2
Unknown
VANADIUM
22
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-21-00
7/19/2017
35.658901
-108.491165
0
2
Unknown
VANADIUM
17
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-22-00
7/19/2017
35.658405
-108.490563
0
2
Unknown
VANADIUM
16
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-23-00
7/18/2017
35.658984
-108.490548
0
2
Unknown
VANADIUM
18
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS45-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659562
-108.493833
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
4000
15
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS45-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659562
-108.493833
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
4000
15
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS46-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659453
-108.493003
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
4900
15
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS47-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659543
-108.49221
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
5100
15
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS48-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659648
-108.491281
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
6000
15
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS50-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.6595
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
6300
15
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS51-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65919
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
6500
15
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS52-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659169
-108.491722
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
6100
15
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS53-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659201
-108.492371
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
5000
15
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS54-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658712
-108.492621
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
7100
15
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS55-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658793
-108.492026
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
8300
16
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS56-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658831
-108.491366
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
5900
15
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS57-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658672
-108.491525
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
7100
15
mg/kg
Page 47 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMPUNC
KMP-SS58-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65853
-108.492
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
6700
15
mg/kg
KMPUNC
KMP-SS59-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658334
-108.491827
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
7000
15
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS60-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658129
-108.492013
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
6000
15
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS61 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.657958
-108.491301
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
6300
15
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS62-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658355
-108.491208
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
6300
15
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS63-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658917
-108.490612
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
5900
15
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS64-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658394
-108.49068
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
6100
15
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS65-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658535
-108.490274
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
6100
15
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS66-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658093
-108.490734
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
5800
15
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS67-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658057
-108.490414
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
6900
15
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS68-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65776
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
7500
15
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS69-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65736
-108.492
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
7500
15
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS70-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.657343
-108.490976
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
6400
15
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS70-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.657343
-108.490976
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
5900
15
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS71-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.656666
-108.491638
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
6100
15
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS72-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.656683
-108.49091
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
6400
15
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS73-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658117
-108.493493
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
6800
15
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS75-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659492
-108.489461
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
5700
15
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS75-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659492
-108.489461
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
5800
15
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS76-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659031
-108.489527
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
7600
15
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS77-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658484
-108.488991
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
7000
15
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS78-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658169
-108.487842
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
5400
15
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS79-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658754
-108.491022
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
6200
15
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS45-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659562
-108.493833
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.1
0.099
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS45-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659562
-108.493833
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.096 J
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS46-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659453
-108.493003
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.041 J
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS47-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659543
-108.49221
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.048 J
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS48-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659648
-108.491281
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.094 J
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS50-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.6595
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.054 J
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS51-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65919
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.07 J
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS52-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659169
-108.491722
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.057 J
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS53-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659201
-108.492371
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.058 J
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS54-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658712
-108.492621
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.11
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS55-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658793
-108.492026
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.15
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS56-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658831
-108.491366
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.066 J
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS57-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658672
-108.491525
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.1 J
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS58-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65853
-108.492
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.11
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS59-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658334
-108.491827
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.092 J
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS60-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658129
-108.492013
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.11
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS61 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.657958
-108.491301
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.1
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS62-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658355
-108.491208
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.1 J
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS63-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658917
-108.490612
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.071 J
0.1
mg/kg
Page 48 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMPUNC
KM P-SS64-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658394
-108.49068
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.088 J
0.1
mg/kg
KMPUNC
KM P-SS65-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658535
-108.490274
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.075 J
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS66-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658093
-108.490734
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.064 J
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS67-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658057
-108.490414
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.079 J
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS68-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65776
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.066 J
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS69-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65736
-108.492
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.071 J
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS70-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.657343
-108.490976
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.052 J
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS70-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.657343
-108.490976
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.047 J
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS71-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.656666
-108.491638
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.061 J
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS72-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.656683
-108.49091
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.069 J
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS73-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658117
-108.493493
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.084 J
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS75-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659492
-108.489461
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.19
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS75-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659492
-108.489461
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.26
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS76-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659031
-108.489527
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.093 J
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS77-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658484
-108.488991
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.11
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS78-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658169
-108.487842
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.058 J
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS79-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658754
-108.491022
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.083 J
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS45-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659562
-108.493833
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
4.3
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS45-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659562
-108.493833
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
4.2
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS46-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659453
-108.493003
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
4.1
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS47-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659543
-108.49221
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
4.4
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS48-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659648
-108.491281
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
5.3
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS50-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.6595
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
5.4
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS51-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65919
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
5.6
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS52-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659169
-108.491722
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
5.1
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS53-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659201
-108.492371
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
4.3
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS54-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658712
-108.492621
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
6.7
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS55-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658793
-108.492026
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
7.5
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS56-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658831
-108.491366
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
5
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS57-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658672
-108.491525
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
6.1
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS58-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65853
-108.492
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
5.4
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS59-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658334
-108.491827
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
6
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS60-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658129
-108.492013
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
6
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS61-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.657958
-108.491301
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
5.4
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS62-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658355
-108.491208
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
5.1
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS63-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658917
-108.490612
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
4.8
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS64-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658394
-108.49068
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
5
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS65-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658535
-108.490274
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
5.2
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS66-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658093
-108.490734
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
4.8
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS67-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658057
-108.490414
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
6.2
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS68-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65776
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
6.9
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS69-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65736
-108.492
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
6.5
0.2
mg/kg
Page 49 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMPUNC
KM P-SS70-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.657343
-108.490976
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
6.1
0.2
mg/kg
KMPUNC
KMP-SS70-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.657343
-108.490976
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
5.6
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS71 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.656666
-108.491638
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
5.6
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS72-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.656683
-108.49091
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
5.9
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS73-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658117
-108.493493
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
6.7
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS75-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659492
-108.489461
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
6.7
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS75-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659492
-108.489461
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
7
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS76-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659031
-108.489527
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
6.8
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS77-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658484
-108.488991
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
6.5
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS78-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658169
-108.487842
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
5.4
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS79-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658754
-108.491022
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
5
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS45-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659562
-108.493833
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
110
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS45-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659562
-108.493833
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
98
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS46-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659453
-108.493003
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
75
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS47-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659543
-108.49221
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
63
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS48-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659648
-108.491281
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
52
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS50-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.6595
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
58
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS51-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65919
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
62
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS52-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659169
-108.491722
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
51
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS53-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659201
-108.492371
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
46
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS54-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658712
-108.492621
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
85
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS55-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658793
-108.492026
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
97
0.52
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS56-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658831
-108.491366
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
52
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS57-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658672
-108.491525
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
65
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS58-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65853
-108.492
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
64
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS59-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658334
-108.491827
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
70
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS60-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658129
-108.492013
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
66
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS61 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.657958
-108.491301
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
70
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS62-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658355
-108.491208
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
59
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS63-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658917
-108.490612
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
50
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS64-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658394
-108.49068
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
52
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS65-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658535
-108.490274
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
57
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS66-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658093
-108.490734
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
49
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS67-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658057
-108.490414
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
99
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS68-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65776
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
91
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS69-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65736
-108.492
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
74
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS70-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.657343
-108.490976
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
59
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS70-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.657343
-108.490976
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
54
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS71-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.656666
-108.491638
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
64
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS72-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.656683
-108.49091
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
60
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS73-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658117
-108.493493
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
92
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS75-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659492
-108.489461
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
170
0.51
mg/kg
Page 50 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMPUNC
KMP-SS75-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659492
-108.489461
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
160
0.51
mg/kg
KMPUNC
KMP-SS76-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659031
-108.489527
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
62
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS77-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658484
-108.488991
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
170
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS78-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658169
-108.487842
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
38
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS79-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658754
-108.491022
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
67
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS45-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659562
-108.493833
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.46
0.05
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS45-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659562
-108.493833
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.45
0.05
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS46-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659453
-108.493003
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.41
0.05
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS47-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659543
-108.49221
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.44
0.051
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS48-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659648
-108.491281
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.49
0.05
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS50-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.6595
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.54
0.051
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS51-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65919
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.54
0.05
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS52-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659169
-108.491722
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.5
0.05
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS53-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659201
-108.492371
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.42
0.05
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS54-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658712
-108.492621
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.63
0.051
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS55-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658793
-108.492026
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.73
0.052
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS56-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658831
-108.491366
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.49
0.051
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS57-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658672
-108.491525
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.59
0.051
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS58-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65853
-108.492
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.54
0.05
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS59-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658334
-108.491827
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.58
0.05
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS60-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658129
-108.492013
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.49
0.051
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS61-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.657958
-108.491301
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.52
0.05
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS62-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658355
-108.491208
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.51
0.051
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS63-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658917
-108.490612
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.5
0.05
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS64-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658394
-108.49068
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.5
0.05
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS65-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658535
-108.490274
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.49
0.05
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS66-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658093
-108.490734
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.47
0.051
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS67-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658057
-108.490414
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.56
0.051
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS68-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65776
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.6
0.051
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS69-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65736
-108.492
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.62
0.05
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS7 0-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.657343
-108.490976
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.51
0.051
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS7 0-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.657343
-108.490976
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.47
0.05
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS71-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.656666
-108.491638
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.48
0.05
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS72-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.656683
-108.49091
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.52
0.051
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS73-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658117
-108.493493
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.59
0.051
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS75-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659492
-108.489461
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.48
0.051
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS75-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659492
-108.489461
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.49
0.051
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS76-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659031
-108.489527
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.63
0.051
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS77-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658484
-108.488991
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.6
0.051
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS78-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658169
-108.487842
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.47
0.051
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS79-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658754
-108.491022
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.49
0.051
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS45-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659562
-108.493833
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.12 J
0.2
mg/kg
Page 51 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMPUNC
KMP-SS45-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659562
-108.493833
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.1 J
0.2
mg/kg
KMPUNC
KM P-SS46-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659453
-108.493003
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.075 J
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS47-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659543
-108.49221
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.076 J
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS48-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659648
-108.491281
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.088 J
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS50-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.6595
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.093 J
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS51-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65919
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.11 J
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS52-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659169
-108.491722
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.048 J
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS53-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659201
-108.492371
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.048 J
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS54-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658712
-108.492621
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.12 J
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS55-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658793
-108.492026
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.13 J
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS56-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658831
-108.491366
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.067 J
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS57-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658672
-108.491525
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.11 J
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS58-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65853
-108.492
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.13 J
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS59-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658334
-108.491827
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.093 J
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS60-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658129
-108.492013
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.075 J
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS61 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.657958
-108.491301
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.11 J
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS62-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658355
-108.491208
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.085 J
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS63-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658917
-108.490612
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.082 J
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS64-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658394
-108.49068
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.065 J
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS65-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658535
-108.490274
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.083 J
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS66-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658093
-108.490734
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.06 J
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS67-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658057
-108.490414
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.1 J
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS68-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65776
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.083 J
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS69-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65736
-108.492
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.13 J
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS70-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.657343
-108.490976
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.073 J
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS70-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.657343
-108.490976
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.063 J
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS71 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.656666
-108.491638
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.11 J
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS72-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.656683
-108.49091
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.079 J
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS73-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658117
-108.493493
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.13 J
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS75-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659492
-108.489461
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.14 J
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS75-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659492
-108.489461
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.16 J
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS76-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659031
-108.489527
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.12 J
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS77-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658484
-108.488991
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.19 J
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS78-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658169
-108.487842
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.071 J
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS79-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658754
-108.491022
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.12 J
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS45-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659562
-108.493833
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
9.6
0.99
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS45-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659562
-108.493833
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
8.4
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS46-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659453
-108.493003
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
5.9
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS47-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659543
-108.49221
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
5.8
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS48-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659648
-108.491281
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
6.7
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS50-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.6595
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
6.9
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS51-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65919
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
7.3
1
mg/kg
Page 52 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMPUNC
KM P-SS52-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659169
-108.491722
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
6.7
1
mg/kg
KMPUNC
KMP-SS53-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659201
-108.492371
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
5.5
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS54-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658712
-108.492621
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
8.7
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS55-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658793
-108.492026
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
9.3
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS56-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658831
-108.491366
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
6.5
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS57-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658672
-108.491525
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
8.1
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS58-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65853
-108.492
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
7.4
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS59-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658334
-108.491827
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
7.7
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS60-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658129
-108.492013
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
6.7
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS61 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.657958
-108.491301
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
7.1
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS62-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658355
-108.491208
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
7
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS63-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658917
-108.490612
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
6.6
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS64-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658394
-108.49068
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
6.9
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS65-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658535
-108.490274
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
6.9
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS66-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658093
-108.490734
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
6.2
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS67-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658057
-108.490414
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
7.9
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS68-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65776
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
8.3
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS69-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65736
-108.492
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
8.4
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS70-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.657343
-108.490976
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
7.1
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS70-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.657343
-108.490976
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
6.7
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS71-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.656666
-108.491638
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
7
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS72-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.656683
-108.49091
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
7.2
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS73-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658117
-108.493493
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
8.1
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS75-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659492
-108.489461
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
10 J
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS75-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659492
-108.489461
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
24 J
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS76-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659031
-108.489527
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
00
CO
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS77-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658484
-108.488991
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
8.4
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS78-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658169
-108.487842
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
6.4
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS79-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658754
-108.491022
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
6.7
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS45-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659562
-108.493833
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
4.7
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS45-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659562
-108.493833
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
4.6
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS46-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659453
-108.493003
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
4
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS47-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659543
-108.49221
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
4.2
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS48-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659648
-108.491281
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
4.4
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS50-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.6595
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
4.6
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS51-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65919
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
5.1
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS52-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659169
-108.491722
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
4.6
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS53-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659201
-108.492371
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
4
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS54-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658712
-108.492621
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
6
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS55-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658793
-108.492026
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
6.7
0.52
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS56-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658831
-108.491366
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
4.1
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS57-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658672
-108.491525
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
5.4
0.51
mg/kg
Page 53 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMPUNC
KMP-SS58-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65853
-108.492
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
4.8
0.5
mg/kg
KMPUNC
KMP-SS59-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658334
-108.491827
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
5.3
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS60-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658129
-108.492013
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
4.9
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS61 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.657958
-108.491301
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
4.6
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS62-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658355
-108.491208
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
4.4
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS63-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658917
-108.490612
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
4.3
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS64-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658394
-108.49068
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
4.5
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS65-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658535
-108.490274
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
4.6
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS66-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658093
-108.490734
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
4.2
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS67-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658057
-108.490414
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
5.5
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS68-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65776
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
6
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS69-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65736
-108.492
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
5.7
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS70-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.657343
-108.490976
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
5.3
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS70-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.657343
-108.490976
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
4.9
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS71-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.656666
-108.491638
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
4.7
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS72-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.656683
-108.49091
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
5.2
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS73-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658117
-108.493493
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
5.9
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS75-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659492
-108.489461
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
4.9
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS75-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659492
-108.489461
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
5.3
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS76-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659031
-108.489527
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
5.5
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS77-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658484
-108.488991
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
5.7
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS78-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658169
-108.487842
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
5.1
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS79-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658754
-108.491022
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
4.6
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS45-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659562
-108.493833
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
9
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS45-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659562
-108.493833
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
00
CO
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS46-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659453
-108.493003
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
7.2
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS47-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659543
-108.49221
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
6.4
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS48-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659648
-108.491281
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
7.7
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS50-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.6595
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
8
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS51-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65919
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
8.9
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS52-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659169
-108.491722
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
7
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS53-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659201
-108.492371
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
5.3
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS54-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658712
-108.492621
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
13
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS55-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658793
-108.492026
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
15
2.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS56-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658831
-108.491366
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
7.4
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS57-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658672
-108.491525
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
10
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS58-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65853
-108.492
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
9.3
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS59-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658334
-108.491827
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
9.5
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS60-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658129
-108.492013
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
9.2
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS61 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.657958
-108.491301
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
00
CO
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS62-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658355
-108.491208
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
7.9
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS63-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658917
-108.490612
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
7.1
2
mg/kg
Page 54 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMPUNC
KM P-SS64-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658394
-108.49068
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
7.7
2
mg/kg
KMPUNC
KM P-SS65-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658535
-108.490274
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
8.2
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS66-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658093
-108.490734
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
6.5
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS67-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658057
-108.490414
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
11
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS68-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65776
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
11
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS69-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65736
-108.492
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
11
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS70-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.657343
-108.490976
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
9.2
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS70-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.657343
-108.490976
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
8.1
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS71-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.656666
-108.491638
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
00
CO
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS72-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.656683
-108.49091
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
9.6
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS73-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658117
-108.493493
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
13
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS75-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659492
-108.489461
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
16
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS75-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659492
-108.489461
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
18
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS76-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659031
-108.489527
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
12
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS77-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658484
-108.488991
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
14
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS78-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658169
-108.487842
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
7.3
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS79-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658754
-108.491022
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
8.7
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS45-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659562
-108.493833
0
3
SW6020
IRON
9300
20
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS45-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659562
-108.493833
0
3
SW6020
IRON
9000
20
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS46-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659453
-108.493003
0
3
SW6020
IRON
11000
20
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS47-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659543
-108.49221
0
3
SW6020
IRON
12000
20
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS48-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659648
-108.491281
0
3
SW6020
IRON
13000
20
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS50-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.6595
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
IRON
14000
20
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS51-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65919
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
IRON
14000
20
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS52-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659169
-108.491722
0
3
SW6020
IRON
14000
20
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS53-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659201
-108.492371
0
3
SW6020
IRON
12000
20
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS54-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658712
-108.492621
0
3
SW6020
IRON
17000
20
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS55-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658793
-108.492026
0
3
SW6020
IRON
19000
21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS56-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658831
-108.491366
0
3
SW6020
IRON
13000
20
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS57-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658672
-108.491525
0
3
SW6020
IRON
16000
20
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS58-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65853
-108.492
0
3
SW6020
IRON
14000
20
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS59-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658334
-108.491827
0
3
SW6020
IRON
16000
20
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS60-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658129
-108.492013
0
3
SW6020
IRON
14000
20
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS61-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.657958
-108.491301
0
3
SW6020
IRON
14000
20
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS62-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658355
-108.491208
0
3
SW6020
IRON
14000
20
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS63-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658917
-108.490612
0
3
SW6020
IRON
13000
20
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS64-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658394
-108.49068
0
3
SW6020
IRON
14000
20
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS65-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658535
-108.490274
0
3
SW6020
IRON
14000
20
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS66-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658093
-108.490734
0
3
SW6020
IRON
13000
20
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS67-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658057
-108.490414
0
3
SW6020
IRON
16000
20
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS68-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65776
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
IRON
17000
20
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS69-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65736
-108.492
0
3
SW6020
IRON
17000
20
mg/kg
Page 55 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMPUNC
KM P-SS70-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.657343
-108.490976
0
3
SW6020
IRON
15000
20
mg/kg
KMPUNC
KMP-SS70-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.657343
-108.490976
0
3
SW6020
IRON
14000
20
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS71 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.656666
-108.491638
0
3
SW6020
IRON
14000
20
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS72-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.656683
-108.49091
0
3
SW6020
IRON
15000
20
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS73-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658117
-108.493493
0
3
SW6020
IRON
16000
20
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS75-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659492
-108.489461
0
3
SW6020
IRON
17000
20
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS75-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659492
-108.489461
0
3
SW6020
IRON
19000
20
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS76-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659031
-108.489527
0
3
SW6020
IRON
17000
20
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS77-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658484
-108.488991
0
3
SW6020
IRON
16000
20
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS78-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658169
-108.487842
0
3
SW6020
IRON
14000
20
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS79-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658754
-108.491022
0
3
SW6020
IRON
13000
20
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS45-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659562
-108.493833
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
8.1
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS45-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659562
-108.493833
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
8.1
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS46-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659453
-108.493003
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
7.4
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS47-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659543
-108.49221
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
7.9
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS48-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659648
-108.491281
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
9.5
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS50-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.6595
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
10
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS51-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65919
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
11
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS52-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659169
-108.491722
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
8.5
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS53-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659201
-108.492371
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
7.2
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS54-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658712
-108.492621
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
12
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS55-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658793
-108.492026
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
15
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS56-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658831
-108.491366
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
9.1
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS57-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658672
-108.491525
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
12
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS58-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65853
-108.492
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
11
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS59-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658334
-108.491827
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
11
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS60-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658129
-108.492013
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
10
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS61 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.657958
-108.491301
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
11
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS62-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658355
-108.491208
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
9.3
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS63-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658917
-108.490612
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
8.6
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS64-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658394
-108.49068
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
9.1
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS65-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658535
-108.490274
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
9.9
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS66-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658093
-108.490734
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
8.3
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS67-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658057
-108.490414
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
12
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS68-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65776
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
12
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS69-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65736
-108.492
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
12
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS70-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.657343
-108.490976
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
10
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS70-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.657343
-108.490976
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
9.4
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS71-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.656666
-108.491638
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
11
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS72-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.656683
-108.49091
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
10
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS73-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658117
-108.493493
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
13
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS75-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659492
-108.489461
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
37 J
0.2
mg/kg
Page 56 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMPUNC
KMP-SS75-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659492
-108.489461
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
130 J
0.2
mg/kg
KMPUNC
KMP-SS76-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659031
-108.489527
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
14
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS77-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658484
-108.488991
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
16
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS78-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658169
-108.487842
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
9.2
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS79-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658754
-108.491022
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
11
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS45-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659562
-108.493833
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
160
0.75
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS45-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659562
-108.493833
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
180
0.75
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS46-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659453
-108.493003
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
180
0.75
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS47-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659543
-108.49221
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
190
0.76
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS48-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659648
-108.491281
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
200
0.75
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS50-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.6595
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
200
0.76
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS51-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65919
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
210
0.75
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS52-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659169
-108.491722
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
180
0.75
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS53-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659201
-108.492371
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
180
0.75
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS54-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658712
-108.492621
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
230
0.76
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS55-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658793
-108.492026
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
270
0.78
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS56-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658831
-108.491366
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
200
0.76
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS57-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658672
-108.491525
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
210
0.77
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS58-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65853
-108.492
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
220
0.75
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS59-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658334
-108.491827
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
220
0.76
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS60-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658129
-108.492013
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
190
0.76
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS61 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.657958
-108.491301
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
200
0.75
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS62-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658355
-108.491208
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
200
0.76
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS63-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658917
-108.490612
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
190
0.75
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS64-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658394
-108.49068
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
180
0.75
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS65-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658535
-108.490274
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
210
0.76
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS66-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658093
-108.490734
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
180
0.76
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS67-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658057
-108.490414
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
230
0.76
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS68-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65776
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
220
0.77
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS69-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65736
-108.492
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
230
0.75
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS70-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.657343
-108.490976
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
170
0.76
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS70-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.657343
-108.490976
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
160
0.75
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS71 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.656666
-108.491638
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
200
0.75
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS72-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.656683
-108.49091
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
200
0.76
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS73-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658117
-108.493493
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
230
0.76
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS75-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659492
-108.489461
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
240
0.76
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS75-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659492
-108.489461
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
230
0.76
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS76-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659031
-108.489527
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
230
0.76
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS77-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658484
-108.488991
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
310
0.76
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS78-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658169
-108.487842
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
210
0.76
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS79-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658754
-108.491022
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
230
0.76
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS45-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659562
-108.493833
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.24
0.2
mg/kg
Page 57 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMPUNC
KMP-SS45-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659562
-108.493833
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.24
0.2
mg/kg
KMPUNC
KM P-SS46-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659453
-108.493003
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.26
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS47-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659543
-108.49221
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.25
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS48-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659648
-108.491281
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.45
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS50-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.6595
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.34 J
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS51-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65919
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.29
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS52-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659169
-108.491722
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.37
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS53-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659201
-108.492371
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.28
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS54-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658712
-108.492621
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.44
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS55-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658793
-108.492026
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.55
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS56-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658831
-108.491366
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.46
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS57-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658672
-108.491525
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.58
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS58-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65853
-108.492
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.38
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS59-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658334
-108.491827
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.46
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS60-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658129
-108.492013
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.61
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS61-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.657958
-108.491301
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.35
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS62-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658355
-108.491208
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.31
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS63-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658917
-108.490612
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.6
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS64-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658394
-108.49068
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.56
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS65-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658535
-108.490274
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.33
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS66-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658093
-108.490734
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.32 J
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS67-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658057
-108.490414
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.36
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS68-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65776
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.3
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS69-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65736
-108.492
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.42
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS70-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.657343
-108.490976
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.27
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS70-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.657343
-108.490976
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.24
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS71 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.656666
-108.491638
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.41
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS72-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.656683
-108.49091
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.3
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS73-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658117
-108.493493
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.42
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS75-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659492
-108.489461
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
1.4
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS75-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659492
-108.489461
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
1.6
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS76-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659031
-108.489527
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.45
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS77-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658484
-108.488991
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.46
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS78-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658169
-108.487842
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.4
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS79-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658754
-108.491022
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.33
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS45-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659562
-108.493833
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
11
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS45-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659562
-108.493833
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
10
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS46-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659453
-108.493003
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
7
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS47-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659543
-108.49221
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
6.3
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS48-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659648
-108.491281
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
7
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS50-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.6595
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
7.4
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS51-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65919
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
7.8
2
mg/kg
Page 58 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMPUNC
KM P-SS52-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659169
-108.491722
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
7.2
2
mg/kg
KMPUNC
KMP-SS53-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659201
-108.492371
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
5.9
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS54-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658712
-108.492621
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
10
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS55-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658793
-108.492026
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
11
2.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS56-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658831
-108.491366
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
6.7
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS57-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658672
-108.491525
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
8.4
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS58-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65853
-108.492
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
7.4
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS59-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658334
-108.491827
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
8.3
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS60-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658129
-108.492013
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
7.7
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS61 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.657958
-108.491301
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
7.4
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS62-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658355
-108.491208
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
6.9
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS63-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658917
-108.490612
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
6.9
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS64-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658394
-108.49068
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
7.1
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS65-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658535
-108.490274
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
7.2
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS66-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658093
-108.490734
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
6.3
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS67-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658057
-108.490414
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
8.7
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS68-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65776
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
9.4
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS69-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65736
-108.492
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
9.1
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS70-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.657343
-108.490976
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
8.2
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS70-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.657343
-108.490976
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
7.6
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS71-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.656666
-108.491638
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
7.5
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS72-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.656683
-108.49091
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
8.1
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS73-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658117
-108.493493
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
9.6
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS75-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659492
-108.489461
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
9.1
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS75-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659492
-108.489461
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
9.4
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS76-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659031
-108.489527
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
9.5
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS77-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658484
-108.488991
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
9.3
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS78-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658169
-108.487842
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
7.5
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS79-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658754
-108.491022
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
7.1
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS45-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659562
-108.493833
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
1.14
0.41
pC
'9
KMP UNC
KMP-SS45-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659562
-108.493833
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
1.09
0.44
pC
<9
KMP UNC
KM P-SS46-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659453
-108.493003
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
2.46 J
0.44
pC
/g
KMP UNC
KMP-SS47-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659543
-108.49221
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
1.54
0.48
o
Q.
/g
KMP UNC
KMP-SS48-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659648
-108.491281
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
24.6
0.8
pC
'g
KMP UNC
KMP-SS50-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.6595
-108.491
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
4.41
0.53
pC
/g
KMP UNC
KM P-SS51-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65919
-108.491
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
1.66
0.39
pC
/g
KMP UNC
KM P-SS52-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659169
-108.491722
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
2.47
0.59
o
Q.
/ g
KMP UNC
KMP-SS53-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659201
-108.492371
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
0.89 J
0.43
o
Q.
/ g
KMP UNC
KM P-SS54-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658712
-108.492621
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
7.6 J
1.1
pC
Zg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS55-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658793
-108.492026
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
8.3 J
0.7
pC
/g
KMP UNC
KM P-SS56-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658831
-108.491366
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
6.57 J
0.5
o
Q.
/g
KMP UNC
KMP-SS57-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658672
-108.491525
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
12 J
0.9
o
Q.
/g
Page 59 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMPUNC
KMP-SS58-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65853
-108.492
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
7.8
0.6
O
Q.
/g
KMPUNC
KMP-SS59-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658334
-108.491827
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
12
0.5
O
Q.
/g
KMP UNC
KM P-SS60-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658129
-108.492013
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
00
CO
0.7
pC
'g
KMP UNC
KM P-SS61-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.657958
-108.491301
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
11.5
0.7
pC
/g
KMP UNC
KM P-SS62-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658355
-108.491208
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
2.67
0.46
o
Q.
/ g
KMP UNC
KM P-SS63-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658917
-108.490612
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
3.17
0.46
O
Q.
/ g
KMP UNC
KM P-SS64-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658394
-108.49068
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
4.23 J
0.39
pC
/g
KMP UNC
KM P-SS65-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658535
-108.490274
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
6.93
0.72
pC
/g
KMP UNC
KM P-SS66-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658093
-108.490734
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
2.95
0.48
o
Q.
/ g
KMP UNC
KMP-SS67-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658057
-108.490414
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
6.08 J
0.69
O
Q.
/ g
KMP UNC
KM P-SS68-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65776
-108.491
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
4.1
0.62
pC
/g
KMP UNC
KMP-SS69-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65736
-108.492
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
4.1 J
0.57
pC
/g
KMP UNC
KMP-SS70-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.657343
-108.490976
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
1.35 J
0.44
o
Q.
/g
KMP UNC
KMP-SS70-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.657343
-108.490976
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
1.53
0.51
O
Q.
/g
KMP UNC
KM P-SS71-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.656666
-108.491638
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
12.9 J
0.7
pC
/g
KMP UNC
KMP-SS72-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.656683
-108.49091
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
2.09 J
0.31
pC
/g
KMP UNC
KMP-SS73-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658117
-108.493493
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
4.9 J
0.69
o
Q.
/g
KMP UNC
KMP-SS75-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659492
-108.489461
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
68.1 M3
1.1
O
Q.
/g
KMP UNC
KMP-SS75-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659492
-108.489461
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
57.9 M3
1
pC
/g
KMP UNC
KMP-SS76-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659031
-108.489527
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
6.17 J
0.5
pC
/g
KMP UNC
KMP-SS77-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658484
-108.488991
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
5.82 J
0.74
o
Q.
/g
KMP UNC
KMP-SS78-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658169
-108.487842
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
2.97 J
0.39
O
Q.
/g
KMP UNC
KMP-SS79-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658754
-108.491022
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
7.3
0.7
pC
/g
KMP UNC
KMP-SS45-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659562
-108.493833
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
0.97 J
0.99
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS45-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659562
-108.493833
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
0.97 J
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS46-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659453
-108.493003
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.2
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS47-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659543
-108.49221
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.1
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS48-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659648
-108.491281
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
6.3
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS50-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.6595
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
2.4
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS51-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65919
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.4
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS52-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659169
-108.491722
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.3
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS53-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659201
-108.492371
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
0.99 J
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS54-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658712
-108.492621
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.9
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS55-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658793
-108.492026
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
2.8
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS56-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658831
-108.491366
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
2.2
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS57-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658672
-108.491525
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
3.3
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS58-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65853
-108.492
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
2.5
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS59-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658334
-108.491827
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
3.5
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS60-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658129
-108.492013
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
3
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS61 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.657958
-108.491301
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
3.9
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS62-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658355
-108.491208
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.5
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS63-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658917
-108.490612
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.7
1
mg/kg
Page 60 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMPUNC
KM P-SS64-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658394
-108.49068
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.7
1
mg/kg
KMPUNC
KM P-SS65-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658535
-108.490274
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
2.1
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS66-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658093
-108.490734
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.4
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS67-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658057
-108.490414
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
2
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS68-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65776
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
2
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS69-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65736
-108.492
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.7
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS70-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.657343
-108.490976
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.2
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS70-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.657343
-108.490976
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.2
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS71-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.656666
-108.491638
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
2.9
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS72-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.656683
-108.49091
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.3
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS73-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658117
-108.493493
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.9
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS75-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659492
-108.489461
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
9.1
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS75-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659492
-108.489461
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
7.8
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS76-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659031
-108.489527
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
2.2
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS77-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658484
-108.488991
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
2
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS78-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658169
-108.487842
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.2
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS79-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658754
-108.491022
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
2.2
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS45-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659562
-108.493833
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.057 U
0.11
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS45-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659562
-108.493833
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.057 U
0.11
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS46-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659453
-108.493003
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.057 U
0.11
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS47-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659543
-108.49221
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.058 U
0.12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS48-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659648
-108.491281
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.057 U
0.11
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS50-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.6595
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.058 U
0.12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS51-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65919
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.057 U
0.11
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS52-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659169
-108.491722
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.057 U
0.11
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS53-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659201
-108.492371
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.057 U
0.11
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS54-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658712
-108.492621
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.062 J
0.12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS55-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658793
-108.492026
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.088 J
0.12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS56-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658831
-108.491366
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.058 U
0.12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS57-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658672
-108.491525
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.058 U
0.12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS58-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65853
-108.492
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.057 U
0.11
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS59-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658334
-108.491827
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.057 U
0.11
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS60-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658129
-108.492013
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.058 U
0.12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS61-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.657958
-108.491301
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.057 U
0.11
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS62-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658355
-108.491208
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.058 U
0.12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS63-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658917
-108.490612
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.057 U
0.11
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS64-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658394
-108.49068
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.057 U
0.11
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS65-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658535
-108.490274
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.058 U
0.12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS66-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658093
-108.490734
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.058 U
0.12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS67-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658057
-108.490414
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.058 U
0.12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS68-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65776
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.058 U
0.12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS69-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65736
-108.492
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.057 J
0.11
mg/kg
Page 61 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMPUNC
KM P-SS70-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.657343
-108.490976
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.058 U
0.12
mg/kg
KMPUNC
KMP-SS70-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.657343
-108.490976
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.057 U
0.11
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS71 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.656666
-108.491638
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.057 U
0.11
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS72-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.656683
-108.49091
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.058 U
0.12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS73-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658117
-108.493493
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.072 J
0.12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS75-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659492
-108.489461
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.058 U
0.12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS75-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659492
-108.489461
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.058 U
0.12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS76-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659031
-108.489527
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.073 J
0.12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS77-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658484
-108.488991
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.066 J
0.12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS78-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658169
-108.487842
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.058 U
0.12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS79-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658754
-108.491022
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.058 U
0.12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS45-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659562
-108.493833
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.097
0.0099
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS45-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659562
-108.493833
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.095
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS46-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659453
-108.493003
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.096
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS47-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659543
-108.49221
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.1
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS48-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659648
-108.491281
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.13
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS50-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.6595
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.13
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS51-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65919
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.13
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS52-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659169
-108.491722
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.12
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS53-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659201
-108.492371
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.093
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS54-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658712
-108.492621
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.15
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS55-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658793
-108.492026
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.18
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS56-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658831
-108.491366
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.12
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS57-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658672
-108.491525
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.14
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS58-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65853
-108.492
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.12
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS59-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658334
-108.491827
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.14
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS60-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658129
-108.492013
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.12
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS61 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.657958
-108.491301
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.12
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS62-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658355
-108.491208
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.11
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS63-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658917
-108.490612
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.11
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS64-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658394
-108.49068
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.12
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS65-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658535
-108.490274
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.12
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS66-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658093
-108.490734
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.1
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS67-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658057
-108.490414
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.14
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS68-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65776
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.14
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS69-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65736
-108.492
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.15
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS70-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.657343
-108.490976
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.12
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS70-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.657343
-108.490976
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.11
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS71 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.656666
-108.491638
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.12
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS72-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.656683
-108.49091
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.12
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS73-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658117
-108.493493
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.14
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS75-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659492
-108.489461
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.14
0.01
mg/kg
Page 62 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMPUNC
KMP-SS75-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659492
-108.489461
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.15
0.01
mg/kg
KMPUNC
KMP-SS76-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659031
-108.489527
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.18
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS77-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658484
-108.488991
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.16
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS78-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658169
-108.487842
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.15
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS79-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658754
-108.491022
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.11
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS45-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659562
-108.493833
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
0.99
0.02
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS45-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659562
-108.493833
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
0.88
0.02
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS46-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659453
-108.493003
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
1.7
0.02
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS47-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659543
-108.49221
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
0.83
0.02
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS48-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659648
-108.491281
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
13
0.02
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS50-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.6595
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
4
0.02
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS51-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65919
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
1.2
0.02
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS52-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659169
-108.491722
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
3.3
0.02
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS53-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659201
-108.492371
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
0.61
0.02
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS54-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658712
-108.492621
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
2.2
0.02
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS55-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658793
-108.492026
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
5.9
0.021
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS56-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658831
-108.491366
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
5.1
0.02
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS57-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658672
-108.491525
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
5.9
0.02
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS58-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65853
-108.492
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
2.6
0.02
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS59-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658334
-108.491827
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
19
0.02
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS60-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658129
-108.492013
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
5.6
0.02
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS61 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.657958
-108.491301
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
8.5
0.02
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS62-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658355
-108.491208
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
3.2
0.02
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS63-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658917
-108.490612
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
4.7
0.02
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS64-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658394
-108.49068
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
5.7
0.02
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS65-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658535
-108.490274
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
4.3
0.02
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS66-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658093
-108.490734
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
4.6
0.02
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS67-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658057
-108.490414
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
3.4
0.02
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS68-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65776
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
3.1
0.02
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS69-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65736
-108.492
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
0.94
0.02
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS70-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.657343
-108.490976
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
0.72
0.02
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS70-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.657343
-108.490976
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
0.63
0.02
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS71 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.656666
-108.491638
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
1.4
0.02
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS72-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.656683
-108.49091
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
0.7
0.02
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS73-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658117
-108.493493
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
1.2
0.02
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS75-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659492
-108.489461
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
19
0.02
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS75-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659492
-108.489461
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
25
0.02
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS76-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659031
-108.489527
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
1.3
0.02
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS77-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658484
-108.488991
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
1.4
0.02
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS78-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658169
-108.487842
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
0.72
0.02
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS79-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658754
-108.491022
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
4.5
0.02
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS45-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659562
-108.493833
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
11
0.5
mg/kg
Page 63 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMPUNC
KMP-SS45-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659562
-108.493833
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
11
0.5
mg/kg
KMPUNC
KM P-SS46-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659453
-108.493003
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
12
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS47-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659543
-108.49221
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
13
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS48-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659648
-108.491281
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
16
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS50-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.6595
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
14
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS51-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65919
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
14
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS52-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659169
-108.491722
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
13
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS53-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659201
-108.492371
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
13
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS54-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658712
-108.492621
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
16
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS55-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658793
-108.492026
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
19
0.52
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS56-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658831
-108.491366
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
14
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS57-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658672
-108.491525
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
17
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS58-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65853
-108.492
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
15
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS59-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658334
-108.491827
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
17
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS60-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658129
-108.492013
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
15
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS61 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.657958
-108.491301
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
16
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS62-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658355
-108.491208
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
14
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS63-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658917
-108.490612
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
13
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS64-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658394
-108.49068
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
14
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS65-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658535
-108.490274
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
15
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS66-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658093
-108.490734
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
13
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS67-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658057
-108.490414
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
16
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS68-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65776
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
16
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS69-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65736
-108.492
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
16
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS70-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.657343
-108.490976
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
14
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS70-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.657343
-108.490976
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
13
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS71 -0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.656666
-108.491638
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
15
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS72-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.656683
-108.49091
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
14
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS73-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658117
-108.493493
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
16
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS75-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659492
-108.489461
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
36
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS75-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659492
-108.489461
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
33
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS76-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659031
-108.489527
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
16
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS77-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658484
-108.488991
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
16
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS78-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658169
-108.487842
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
12
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS79-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658754
-108.491022
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
14
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS45-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659562
-108.493833
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
33
9.9
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS45-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659562
-108.493833
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
32
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS46-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659453
-108.493003
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
32
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS47-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659543
-108.49221
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
34
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS48-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659648
-108.491281
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
39
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS50-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.6595
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
40
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS51-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65919
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
43
10
mg/kg
Page 64 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMPUNC
KM P-SS52-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659169
-108.491722
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
37
10
mg/kg
KMPUNC
KMP-SS53-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659201
-108.492371
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
31
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS54-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658712
-108.492621
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
51
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS55-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658793
-108.492026
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
59
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS56-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658831
-108.491366
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
38
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS57-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658672
-108.491525
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
48
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS58-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65853
-108.492
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
43
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS59-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658334
-108.491827
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
47
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS60-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658129
-108.492013
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
43
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS61-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.657958
-108.491301
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
41
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS62-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658355
-108.491208
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
39
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS63-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658917
-108.490612
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
39
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS64-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658394
-108.49068
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
39
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS65-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658535
-108.490274
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
40
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS66-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658093
-108.490734
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
36
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS67-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658057
-108.490414
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
48
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS68-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65776
-108.491
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
47
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS69-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.65736
-108.492
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
51
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS70-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.657343
-108.490976
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
43
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS70-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.657343
-108.490976
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
39
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS71-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.656666
-108.491638
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
43
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS72-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.656683
-108.49091
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
47
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS73-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658117
-108.493493
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
53
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS75-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659492
-108.489461
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
95
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS75-0000-0003-02
5/19/2022
35.659492
-108.489461
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
90
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SS76-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659031
-108.489527
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
53
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS77-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658484
-108.488991
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
55
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS78-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658169
-108.487842
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
39
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SS79-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.658754
-108.491022
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
39
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB27-0000-0006-01
6/3/2022
35.659216
-108.489648
0
6
SW6020
ALUMINUM
7000
16
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB27-0000-0006-01
6/3/2022
35.659216
-108.489648
0
6
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.081 J
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB27-0000-0006-01
6/3/2022
35.659216
-108.489648
0
6
SW6020
ARSENIC
5.9
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB27-0000-0006-01
6/3/2022
35.659216
-108.489648
0
6
SW6020
BARIUM
81
0.52
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB27-0000-0006-01
6/3/2022
35.659216
-108.489648
0
6
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.6
0.052
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB27-0000-0006-01
6/3/2022
35.659216
-108.489648
0
6
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.07 J
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB27-0000-0006-01
6/3/2022
35.659216
-108.489648
0
6
SW6020
CHROMIUM
8.1
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB27-0000-0006-01
6/3/2022
35.659216
-108.489648
0
6
SW6020
COBALT
5
0.52
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB27-0000-0006-01
6/3/2022
35.659216
-108.489648
0
6
SW6020
COPPER
9.3
2.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB27-0000-0006-01
6/3/2022
35.659216
-108.489648
0
6
SW6020
IRON
15000
21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB27-0000-0006-01
6/3/2022
35.659216
-108.489648
0
6
SW6020
LEAD
10
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB27-0000-0006-01
6/3/2022
35.659216
-108.489648
0
6
SW6020
MANGANESE
200
0.78
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB27-0000-0006-01
6/3/2022
35.659216
-108.489648
0
6
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.41
0.21
mg/kg
Page 65 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMPUNC
KM P-SB27-0000-0006-01
6/3/2022
35.659216
-108.489648
0
6
SW6020
NICKEL
8.7
2.1
mg/kg
KMPUNC
KM P-SB27-0000-0006-01
6/3/2022
35.659216
-108.489648
0
6
713R15
Ra-226
1.27
0.4
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KM P-SB27-0000-0006-01
6/3/2022
35.659216
-108.489648
0
6
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.3
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB27-0000-0006-01
6/3/2022
35.659216
-108.489648
0
6
SW6020
SILVER
0.059 U
0.12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB27-0000-0006-01
6/3/2022
35.659216
-108.489648
0
6
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.17
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB27-0000-0006-01
6/3/2022
35.659216
-108.489648
0
6
SW6020
URANIUM
1.5
0.021
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB27-0000-0006-01
6/3/2022
35.659216
-108.489648
0
6
SW6020
VANADIUM
14
0.52
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB27-0000-0006-01
6/3/2022
35.659216
-108.489648
0
6
SW6020
ZINC
40
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB25-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.659242
-108.491829
6
12
SW6020
ALUMINUM
5500
16
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
6
12
SW6020
ALUMINUM
8300
16
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB35-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.658326
-108.491719
6
12
SW6020
ALUMINUM
5400
15
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB38-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.657432
-108.490829
6
12
SW6020
ALUMINUM
7200
17
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB25-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.659242
-108.491829
6
12
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.058 J
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
6
12
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.14
0.11
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB35-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.658326
-108.491719
6
12
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.1
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB38-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.657432
-108.490829
6
12
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.11 J
0.11
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB25-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.659242
-108.491829
6
12
SW6020
ARSENIC
4.7
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
6
12
SW6020
ARSENIC
6.8
0.22
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB35-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.658326
-108.491719
6
12
SW6020
ARSENIC
5.3
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB38-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.657432
-108.490829
6
12
SW6020
ARSENIC
6
0.22
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB25-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.659242
-108.491829
6
12
SW6020
BARIUM
47
0.52
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
6
12
SW6020
BARIUM
110
0.55
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB35-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.658326
-108.491719
6
12
SW6020
BARIUM
65
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB38-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.657432
-108.490829
6
12
SW6020
BARIUM
69
0.55
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB25-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.659242
-108.491829
6
12
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.47
0.052
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
6
12
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.67
0.055
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB35-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.658326
-108.491719
6
12
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.44
0.05
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB38-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.657432
-108.490829
6
12
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.55
0.055
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB25-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.659242
-108.491829
6
12
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.045 J
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
6
12
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.14 J
0.22
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB35-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.658326
-108.491719
6
12
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.11 J
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB38-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.657432
-108.490829
6
12
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.094 J
0.22
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB25-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.659242
-108.491829
6
12
SW6020
CHROMIUM
6.1
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
6
12
SW6020
CHROMIUM
8.7
1.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB35-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.658326
-108.491719
6
12
SW6020
CHROMIUM
5.8
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB38-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.657432
-108.490829
6
12
SW6020
CHROMIUM
7.5
1.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB25-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.659242
-108.491829
6
12
SW6020
COBALT
4.4
0.52
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
6
12
SW6020
COBALT
6
0.55
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB35-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.658326
-108.491719
6
12
SW6020
COBALT
4.2
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB38-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.657432
-108.490829
6
12
SW6020
COBALT
5.9
0.55
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB25-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.659242
-108.491829
6
12
SW6020
COPPER
6.6
2.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
6
12
SW6020
COPPER
12
2.2
mg/kg
Page 66 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMPUNC
KMP-SB35-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.658326
-108.491719
6
12
SW6020
COPPER
7.6
2
mg/kg
KMPUNC
KMP-SB38-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.657432
-108.490829
6
12
SW6020
COPPER
9.8
2.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB25-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.659242
-108.491829
6
12
SW6020
IRON
12000
21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
6
12
SW6020
IRON
16000
22
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB35-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.658326
-108.491719
6
12
SW6020
IRON
12000
20
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB38-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.657432
-108.490829
6
12
SW6020
IRON
16000
22
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB25-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.659242
-108.491829
6
12
SW6020
LEAD
7.7
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
6
12
SW6020
LEAD
13
0.22
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB35-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.658326
-108.491719
6
12
SW6020
LEAD
9.7
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB38-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.657432
-108.490829
6
12
SW6020
LEAD
11
0.22
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB25-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.659242
-108.491829
6
12
SW6020
MANGANESE
180
0.78
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
6
12
SW6020
MANGANESE
270
0.82
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB35-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.658326
-108.491719
6
12
SW6020
MANGANESE
230
0.76
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB38-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.657432
-108.490829
6
12
SW6020
MANGANESE
250
0.83
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB25-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.659242
-108.491829
6
12
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.67
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
6
12
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.48
0.22
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB35-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.658326
-108.491719
6
12
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.62
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB38-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.657432
-108.490829
6
12
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.5
0.22
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB25-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.659242
-108.491829
6
12
SW6020
NICKEL
6.5
2.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
6
12
SW6020
NICKEL
9.7
2.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB35-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.658326
-108.491719
6
12
SW6020
NICKEL
6.1
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB38-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.657432
-108.490829
6
12
SW6020
NICKEL
8.9
2.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB25-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.659242
-108.491829
6
12
713R15
Ra-226
1.81 J
0.44
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
6
12
713R15
Ra-226
1.16 J
0.57
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KMP-SB35-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.658326
-108.491719
6
12
713R15
Ra-226
27.1 J
0.8
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KMP-SB38-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.657432
-108.490829
6
12
713R15
Ra-226
1.4 J
0.59
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KMP-SB25-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.659242
-108.491829
6
12
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.5
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
6
12
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.5
1.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB35-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.658326
-108.491719
6
12
SW6020
SELENIUM
6.4
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB38-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.657432
-108.490829
6
12
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.3
1.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB25-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.659242
-108.491829
6
12
SW6020
SILVER
0.06 U
0.12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
6
12
SW6020
SILVER
0.067 J
0.12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB35-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.658326
-108.491719
6
12
SW6020
SILVER
0.057 UJ
0.11
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB38-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.657432
-108.490829
6
12
SW6020
SILVER
0.063 UJ
0.13
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB25-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.659242
-108.491829
6
12
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.11
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB26-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
6
12
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.17
0.011
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB35-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.658326
-108.491719
6
12
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.1
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB38-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.657432
-108.490829
6
12
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.13
0.011
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB25-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.659242
-108.491829
6
12
SW6020
URANIUM
23
0.021
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
6
12
SW6020
URANIUM
5.9
0.022
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB35-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.658326
-108.491719
6
12
SW6020
URANIUM
30
0.02
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB38-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.657432
-108.490829
6
12
SW6020
URANIUM
1.4
0.022
mg/kg
Page 67 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMPUNC
KMP-SB25-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.659242
-108.491829
6
12
SW6020
VANADIUM
13
0.52
mg/kg
KMPUNC
KMP-SB26-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
6
12
SW6020
VANADIUM
17
0.55
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB35-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.658326
-108.491719
6
12
SW6020
VANADIUM
17
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB38-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.657432
-108.490829
6
12
SW6020
VANADIUM
16
0.55
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB25-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.659242
-108.491829
6
12
SW6020
ZINC
32
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
6
12
SW6020
ZINC
48
11
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB35-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.658326
-108.491719
6
12
SW6020
ZINC
36
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB38-0006-0012-01
6/3/2022
35.657432
-108.490829
6
12
SW6020
ZINC
44
11
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0012-0018-01
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
12
18
SW6020
ALUMINUM
7600
16
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0012-0018-02
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
12
18
SW6020
ALUMINUM
7700
16
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB27-0012-0018-01
6/3/2022
35.659216
-108.489648
12
18
SW6020
ALUMINUM
8200
16
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0012-0018-01
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
12
18
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.11
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0012-0018-02
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
12
18
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.099 J
0.11
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB27-0012-0018-01
6/3/2022
35.659216
-108.489648
12
18
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.091 J
0.11
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0012-0018-01
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
12
18
SW6020
ARSENIC
6.5
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0012-0018-02
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
12
18
SW6020
ARSENIC
6.5
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB27-0012-0018-01
6/3/2022
35.659216
-108.489648
12
18
SW6020
ARSENIC
6.7
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0012-0018-01
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
12
18
SW6020
BARIUM
85
0.52
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0012-0018-02
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
12
18
SW6020
BARIUM
90
0.53
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB27-0012-0018-01
6/3/2022
35.659216
-108.489648
12
18
SW6020
BARIUM
92
0.53
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0012-0018-01
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
12
18
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.63
0.052
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0012-0018-02
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
12
18
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.63
0.053
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB27-0012-0018-01
6/3/2022
35.659216
-108.489648
12
18
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.68
0.053
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0012-0018-01
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
12
18
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.12 J
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0012-0018-02
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
12
18
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.1 J
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB27-0012-0018-01
6/3/2022
35.659216
-108.489648
12
18
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.08 J
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0012-0018-01
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
12
18
SW6020
CHROMIUM
8.4
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0012-0018-02
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
12
18
SW6020
CHROMIUM
8.4
1.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB27-0012-0018-01
6/3/2022
35.659216
-108.489648
12
18
SW6020
CHROMIUM
9
1.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0012-0018-01
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
12
18
SW6020
COBALT
5.7
0.52
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0012-0018-02
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
12
18
SW6020
COBALT
5.7
0.53
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB27-0012-0018-01
6/3/2022
35.659216
-108.489648
12
18
SW6020
COBALT
5.8
0.53
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0012-0018-01
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
12
18
SW6020
COPPER
11
2.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0012-0018-02
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
12
18
SW6020
COPPER
11
2.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB27-0012-0018-01
6/3/2022
35.659216
-108.489648
12
18
SW6020
COPPER
11
2.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0012-0018-01
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
12
18
SW6020
IRON
16000
21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0012-0018-02
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
12
18
SW6020
IRON
16000
21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB27-0012-0018-01
6/3/2022
35.659216
-108.489648
12
18
SW6020
IRON
16000
21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0012-0018-01
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
12
18
SW6020
LEAD
12
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0012-0018-02
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
12
18
SW6020
LEAD
12
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB27-0012-0018-01
6/3/2022
35.659216
-108.489648
12
18
SW6020
LEAD
11
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0012-0018-01
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
12
18
SW6020
MANGANESE
240
0.78
mg/kg
Page 68 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMPUNC
KMP-SB26-0012-0018-02
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
12
18
SW6020
MANGANESE
250
0.79
mg/kg
KMPUNC
KMP-SB27-0012-0018-01
6/3/2022
35.659216
-108.489648
12
18
SW6020
MANGANESE
230
0.79
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0012-0018-01
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
12
18
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.43
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0012-0018-02
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
12
18
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.41
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB27-0012-0018-01
6/3/2022
35.659216
-108.489648
12
18
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.41
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0012-0018-01
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
12
18
SW6020
NICKEL
9.4
2.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0012-0018-02
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
12
18
SW6020
NICKEL
9.4
2.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB27-0012-0018-01
6/3/2022
35.659216
-108.489648
12
18
SW6020
NICKEL
9.7
2.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0012-0018-01
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
12
18
713R15
Ra-226
1.32 J
0.33
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0012-0018-02
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
12
18
713R15
Ra-226
1.83 J
0.86
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KMP-SB27-0012-0018-01
6/3/2022
35.659216
-108.489648
12
18
713R15
Ra-226
1.17 J
0.49
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0012-0018-01
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
12
18
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.3
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0012-0018-02
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
12
18
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.3
1.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB27-0012-0018-01
6/3/2022
35.659216
-108.489648
12
18
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.5
1.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0012-0018-01
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
12
18
SW6020
SILVER
0.063 J
0.12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0012-0018-02
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
12
18
SW6020
SILVER
0.066 J
0.12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB27-0012-0018-01
6/3/2022
35.659216
-108.489648
12
18
SW6020
SILVER
0.069 J
0.12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0012-0018-01
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
12
18
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.18
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0012-0018-02
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
12
18
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.18
0.011
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB27-0012-0018-01
6/3/2022
35.659216
-108.489648
12
18
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.18
0.011
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0012-0018-01
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
12
18
SW6020
URANIUM
1.8
0.021
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0012-0018-02
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
12
18
SW6020
URANIUM
1.6
0.021
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB27-0012-0018-01
6/3/2022
35.659216
-108.489648
12
18
SW6020
URANIUM
0.8
0.021
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0012-0018-01
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
12
18
SW6020
VANADIUM
15
0.52
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0012-0018-02
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
12
18
SW6020
VANADIUM
16
0.53
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB27-0012-0018-01
6/3/2022
35.659216
-108.489648
12
18
SW6020
VANADIUM
16
0.53
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0012-0018-01
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
12
18
SW6020
ZINC
45
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB26-0012-0018-02
6/3/2022
35.659916
-108.49061
12
18
SW6020
ZINC
46
11
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB27-0012-0018-01
6/3/2022
35.659216
-108.489648
12
18
SW6020
ZINC
46
11
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB24-0018-0024-01
6/3/2022
35.658718
-108.492772
18
24
SW6020
ALUMINUM
6900
17
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB25-0018-0024-01
6/3/2022
35.659242
-108.491829
18
24
SW6020
ALUMINUM
6000
16
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB24-0018-0024-01
6/3/2022
35.658718
-108.492772
18
24
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.1 J
0.12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB25-0018-0024-01
6/3/2022
35.659242
-108.491829
18
24
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.064 J
0.11
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-16-18
7/18/2017
35.658292
-108.491842
18
24
Unknown
ARSENIC
5.1
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-17-18
7/19/2017
35.658397
-108.491778
18
24
Unknown
ARSENIC
4.9
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-18-18
7/19/2017
35.658584
-108.491524
18
24
Unknown
ARSENIC
4.5
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-19-18
7/19/2017
35.65865
-108.491373
18
24
Unknown
ARSENIC
5
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-20-18
7/19/2017
35.658809
-108.491224
18
24
Unknown
ARSENIC
4.2
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-21-18
7/19/2017
35.658901
-108.491165
18
24
Unknown
ARSENIC
4
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-22-18
7/19/2017
35.658405
-108.490563
18
24
Unknown
ARSENIC
5.3
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-23-18
7/18/2017
35.658984
-108.490548
18
24
Unknown
ARSENIC
4.9
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB24-0018-0024-01
6/3/2022
35.658718
-108.492772
18
24
SW6020
ARSENIC
7
0.23
mg/kg
Page 69 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMPUNC
KMP-SB25-0018-0024-01
6/3/2022
35.659242
-108.491829
18
24
SW6020
ARSENIC
5.1
0.22
mg/kg
KMPUNC
KMP-16-18
7/18/2017
35.658292
-108.491842
18
24
Unknown
BARIUM
190
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-17-18
7/19/2017
35.658397
-108.491778
18
24
Unknown
BARIUM
55
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-18-18
7/19/2017
35.658584
-108.491524
18
24
Unknown
BARIUM
43
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-19-18
7/19/2017
35.65865
-108.491373
18
24
Unknown
BARIUM
62
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-20-18
7/19/2017
35.658809
-108.491224
18
24
Unknown
BARIUM
74
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-21-18
7/19/2017
35.658901
-108.491165
18
24
Unknown
BARIUM
41
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-22-18
7/19/2017
35.658405
-108.490563
18
24
Unknown
BARIUM
47
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-23-18
7/18/2017
35.658984
-108.490548
18
24
Unknown
BARIUM
51
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB24-0018-0024-01
6/3/2022
35.658718
-108.492772
18
24
SW6020
BARIUM
60
0.58
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB25-0018-0024-01
6/3/2022
35.659242
-108.491829
18
24
SW6020
BARIUM
44
0.55
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB24-0018-0024-01
6/3/2022
35.658718
-108.492772
18
24
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.6
0.058
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB25-0018-0024-01
6/3/2022
35.659242
-108.491829
18
24
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.51
0.055
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-16-18
7/18/2017
35.658292
-108.491842
18
24
Unknown
CADMIUM
0.11 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-17-18
7/19/2017
35.658397
-108.491778
18
24
Unknown
CADMIUM
0.12 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-18-18
7/19/2017
35.658584
-108.491524
18
24
Unknown
CADMIUM
0.11 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-19-18
7/19/2017
35.65865
-108.491373
18
24
Unknown
CADMIUM
0.13 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-20-18
7/19/2017
35.658809
-108.491224
18
24
Unknown
CADMIUM
0.13 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-21-18
7/19/2017
35.658901
-108.491165
18
24
Unknown
CADMIUM
0.076 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-22-18
7/19/2017
35.658405
-108.490563
18
24
Unknown
CADMIUM
0.062
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-23-18
7/18/2017
35.658984
-108.490548
18
24
Unknown
CADMIUM
0.077 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB24-0018-0024-01
6/3/2022
35.658718
-108.492772
18
24
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.094 J
0.23
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB25-0018-0024-01
6/3/2022
35.659242
-108.491829
18
24
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.054 J
0.22
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-16-18
7/18/2017
35.658292
-108.491842
18
24
Unknown
CHROMIUM
8.1
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-17-18
7/19/2017
35.658397
-108.491778
18
24
Unknown
CHROMIUM
7
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-18-18
7/19/2017
35.658584
-108.491524
18
24
Unknown
CHROMIUM
7
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-19-18
7/19/2017
35.65865
-108.491373
18
24
Unknown
CHROMIUM
7.7
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-20-18
7/19/2017
35.658809
-108.491224
18
24
Unknown
CHROMIUM
8.6
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-21-18
7/19/2017
35.658901
-108.491165
18
24
Unknown
CHROMIUM
5.9
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-22-18
7/19/2017
35.658405
-108.490563
18
24
Unknown
CHROMIUM
7.8
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-23-18
7/18/2017
35.658984
-108.490548
18
24
Unknown
CHROMIUM
7.8
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB24-0018-0024-01
6/3/2022
35.658718
-108.492772
18
24
SW6020
CHROMIUM
7.6
1.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB25-0018-0024-01
6/3/2022
35.659242
-108.491829
18
24
SW6020
CHROMIUM
6.6
1.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB24-0018-0024-01
6/3/2022
35.658718
-108.492772
18
24
SW6020
COBALT
5.9
0.58
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB25-0018-0024-01
6/3/2022
35.659242
-108.491829
18
24
SW6020
COBALT
4.7
0.55
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB24-0018-0024-01
6/3/2022
35.658718
-108.492772
18
24
SW6020
COPPER
11
2.3
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB25-0018-0024-01
6/3/2022
35.659242
-108.491829
18
24
SW6020
COPPER
7.4
2.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB24-0018-0024-01
6/3/2022
35.658718
-108.492772
18
24
SW6020
IRON
16000
23
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB25-0018-0024-01
6/3/2022
35.659242
-108.491829
18
24
SW6020
IRON
13000
22
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-16-18
7/18/2017
35.658292
-108.491842
18
24
Unknown
LEAD
11
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-17-18
7/19/2017
35.658397
-108.491778
18
24
Unknown
LEAD
7.6
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-18-18
7/19/2017
35.658584
-108.491524
18
24
Unknown
LEAD
7.2
Unknown
mg/kg
Page 70 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMPUNC
KMP-19-18
7/19/2017
35.65865
-108.491373
18
24
Unknown
LEAD
9.1
Unknown
mg/kg
KMPUNC
KMP-20-18
7/19/2017
35.658809
-108.491224
18
24
Unknown
LEAD
6.7
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-21-18
7/19/2017
35.658901
-108.491165
18
24
Unknown
LEAD
6.4
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-22-18
7/19/2017
35.658405
-108.490563
18
24
Unknown
LEAD
8.5
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-23-18
7/18/2017
35.658984
-108.490548
18
24
Unknown
LEAD
7.9
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB24-0018-0024-01
6/3/2022
35.658718
-108.492772
18
24
SW6020
LEAD
12
0.23
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB25-0018-0024-01
6/3/2022
35.659242
-108.491829
18
24
SW6020
LEAD
8.2
0.22
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB24-0018-0024-01
6/3/2022
35.658718
-108.492772
18
24
SW6020
MANGANESE
220
0.86
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB25-0018-0024-01
6/3/2022
35.659242
-108.491829
18
24
SW6020
MANGANESE
190
0.82
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-16-18
7/18/2017
35.658292
-108.491842
18
24
Unknown
MOLYBDENUM
1.4
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-17-18
7/19/2017
35.658397
-108.491778
18
24
Unknown
MOLYBDENUM
0.64 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-18-18
7/19/2017
35.658584
-108.491524
18
24
Unknown
MOLYBDENUM
0.75 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-19-18
7/19/2017
35.65865
-108.491373
18
24
Unknown
MOLYBDENUM
0.79 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-20-18
7/19/2017
35.658809
-108.491224
18
24
Unknown
MOLYBDENUM
0.69 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-21-18
7/19/2017
35.658901
-108.491165
18
24
Unknown
MOLYBDENUM
0.76 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-22-18
7/19/2017
35.658405
-108.490563
18
24
Unknown
MOLYBDENUM
0.51 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-23-18
7/18/2017
35.658984
-108.490548
18
24
Unknown
MOLYBDENUM
1 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB24-0018-0024-01
6/3/2022
35.658718
-108.492772
18
24
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.4
0.23
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB25-0018-0024-01
6/3/2022
35.659242
-108.491829
18
24
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.47
0.22
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB24-0018-0024-01
6/3/2022
35.658718
-108.492772
18
24
SW6020
NICKEL
9
2.3
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB25-0018-0024-01
6/3/2022
35.659242
-108.491829
18
24
SW6020
NICKEL
6.9
2.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-16-18
7/18/2017
35.658292
-108.491842
18
24
Unknown
Ra-226
143.1
Unknown
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KMP-17-18
7/19/2017
35.658397
-108.491778
18
24
Unknown
Ra-226
8.3
Unknown
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KMP-18-18
7/19/2017
35.658584
-108.491524
18
24
Unknown
Ra-226
1.9
Unknown
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KMP-19-18
7/19/2017
35.65865
-108.491373
18
24
Unknown
Ra-226
3.1
Unknown
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KMP-20-18
7/19/2017
35.658809
-108.491224
18
24
Unknown
Ra-226
2.3
Unknown
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KMP-21-18
7/19/2017
35.658901
-108.491165
18
24
Unknown
Ra-226
3.2
Unknown
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KMP-22-18
7/19/2017
35.658405
-108.490563
18
24
Unknown
Ra-226
1.1
Unknown
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KMP-23-18
7/18/2017
35.658984
-108.490548
18
24
Unknown
Ra-226
1.3
Unknown
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KMP-SB24-0018-0024-01
6/3/2022
35.658718
-108.492772
18
24
713R15
Ra-226
0.98 J
0.54
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KMP-SB25-0018-0024-01
6/3/2022
35.659242
-108.491829
18
24
713R15
Ra-226
0.92 J
0.38
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KMP-16-18
7/18/2017
35.658292
-108.491842
18
24
Unknown
SELENIUM
37
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-17-18
7/19/2017
35.658397
-108.491778
18
24
Unknown
SELENIUM
3
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-18-18
7/19/2017
35.658584
-108.491524
18
24
Unknown
SELENIUM
1.4
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-19-18
7/19/2017
35.65865
-108.491373
18
24
Unknown
SELENIUM
3.3
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-20-18
7/19/2017
35.658809
-108.491224
18
24
Unknown
SELENIUM
1.6
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-21-18
7/19/2017
35.658901
-108.491165
18
24
Unknown
SELENIUM
1.6
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-22-18
7/19/2017
35.658405
-108.490563
18
24
Unknown
SELENIUM
1.7
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-23-18
7/18/2017
35.658984
-108.490548
18
24
Unknown
SELENIUM
1.3
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB24-0018-0024-01
6/3/2022
35.658718
-108.492772
18
24
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.4
1.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB25-0018-0024-01
6/3/2022
35.659242
-108.491829
18
24
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.1 J
1.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-16-18
7/18/2017
35.658292
-108.491842
18
24
Unknown
SILVER
0.52 U
Unknown
mg/kg
Page 71 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMPUNC
KMP-17-18
7/19/2017
35.658397
-108.491778
18
24
Unknown
SILVER
0.46 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMPUNC
KMP-18-18
7/19/2017
35.658584
-108.491524
18
24
Unknown
SILVER
0.45 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-19-18
7/19/2017
35.65865
-108.491373
18
24
Unknown
SILVER
0.53 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-20-18
7/19/2017
35.658809
-108.491224
18
24
Unknown
SILVER
0.5 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-21-18
7/19/2017
35.658901
-108.491165
18
24
Unknown
SILVER
0.46 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-22-18
7/19/2017
35.658405
-108.490563
18
24
Unknown
SILVER
0.19
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-23-18
7/18/2017
35.658984
-108.490548
18
24
Unknown
SILVER
0.51 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB24-0018-0024-01
6/3/2022
35.658718
-108.492772
18
24
SW6020
SILVER
0.066 U
0.13
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB25-0018-0024-01
6/3/2022
35.659242
-108.491829
18
24
SW6020
SILVER
0.062 U
0.12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB24-0018-0024-01
6/3/2022
35.658718
-108.492772
18
24
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.15
0.012
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB25-0018-0024-01
6/3/2022
35.659242
-108.491829
18
24
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.12
0.011
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-16-18
7/18/2017
35.658292
-108.491842
18
24
Unknown
URANIUM
110
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-17-18
7/19/2017
35.658397
-108.491778
18
24
Unknown
URANIUM
130
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-18-18
7/19/2017
35.658584
-108.491524
18
24
Unknown
URANIUM
24
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-19-18
7/19/2017
35.65865
-108.491373
18
24
Unknown
URANIUM
60
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-20-18
7/19/2017
35.658809
-108.491224
18
24
Unknown
URANIUM
22
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-21-18
7/19/2017
35.658901
-108.491165
18
24
Unknown
URANIUM
35
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-22-18
7/19/2017
35.658405
-108.490563
18
24
Unknown
URANIUM
4.3
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-23-18
7/18/2017
35.658984
-108.490548
18
24
Unknown
URANIUM
44
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB24-0018-0024-01
6/3/2022
35.658718
-108.492772
18
24
SW6020
URANIUM
2.2
0.023
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB25-0018-0024-01
6/3/2022
35.659242
-108.491829
18
24
SW6020
URANIUM
60
0.022
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-16-18
7/18/2017
35.658292
-108.491842
18
24
Unknown
VANADIUM
58
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-17-18
7/19/2017
35.658397
-108.491778
18
24
Unknown
VANADIUM
17
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-18-18
7/19/2017
35.658584
-108.491524
18
24
Unknown
VANADIUM
16
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-19-18
7/19/2017
35.65865
-108.491373
18
24
Unknown
VANADIUM
18
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-20-18
7/19/2017
35.658809
-108.491224
18
24
Unknown
VANADIUM
17
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-21-18
7/19/2017
35.658901
-108.491165
18
24
Unknown
VANADIUM
13
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-22-18
7/19/2017
35.658405
-108.490563
18
24
Unknown
VANADIUM
16
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-23-18
7/18/2017
35.658984
-108.490548
18
24
Unknown
VANADIUM
16
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB24-0018-0024-01
6/3/2022
35.658718
-108.492772
18
24
SW6020
VANADIUM
15
0.58
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB25-0018-0024-01
6/3/2022
35.659242
-108.491829
18
24
SW6020
VANADIUM
13
0.55
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB24-0018-0024-01
6/3/2022
35.658718
-108.492772
18
24
SW6020
ZINC
46
12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB25-0018-0024-01
6/3/2022
35.659242
-108.491829
18
24
SW6020
ZINC
35
11
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB30-0030-0036-01
6/4/2022
35.65856
-108.49066
30
36
SW6020
ALUMINUM
5600
15
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B36-0030-0036-01
6/3/2022
35.658143
-108.491879
30
36
SW6020
ALUMINUM
6100
15
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B30-0030-0036-01
6/4/2022
35.65856
-108.49066
30
36
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.058 J
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B36-0030-0036-01
6/3/2022
35.658143
-108.491879
30
36
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.074 J
0.099
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B30-0030-0036-01
6/4/2022
35.65856
-108.49066
30
36
SW6020
ARSENIC
4.9
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B36-0030-0036-01
6/3/2022
35.658143
-108.491879
30
36
SW6020
ARSENIC
5.5
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B30-0030-0036-01
6/4/2022
35.65856
-108.49066
30
36
SW6020
BARIUM
43
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B36-0030-0036-01
6/3/2022
35.658143
-108.491879
30
36
SW6020
BARIUM
51
0.49
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B30-0030-0036-01
6/4/2022
35.65856
-108.49066
30
36
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.48
0.051
mg/kg
Page 72 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMPUNC
KM P-S B36-0030-0036-01
6/3/2022
35.658143
-108.491879
30
36
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.5
0.049
mg/kg
KMPUNC
KM P-S B30-0030-0036-01
6/4/2022
35.65856
-108.49066
30
36
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.047 J
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B36-0030-0036-01
6/3/2022
35.658143
-108.491879
30
36
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.065 J
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B30-0030-0036-01
6/4/2022
35.65856
-108.49066
30
36
SW6020
CHROMIUM
6.1
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B36-0030-0036-01
6/3/2022
35.658143
-108.491879
30
36
SW6020
CHROMIUM
6.7
0.99
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B30-0030-0036-01
6/4/2022
35.65856
-108.49066
30
36
SW6020
COBALT
5.2
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B36-0030-0036-01
6/3/2022
35.658143
-108.491879
30
36
SW6020
COBALT
4.7
0.49
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B30-0030-0036-01
6/4/2022
35.65856
-108.49066
30
36
SW6020
COPPER
6.4
2.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B36-0030-0036-01
6/3/2022
35.658143
-108.491879
30
36
SW6020
COPPER
8
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B30-0030-0036-01
6/4/2022
35.65856
-108.49066
30
36
SW6020
IRON
12000
21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B36-0030-0036-01
6/3/2022
35.658143
-108.491879
30
36
SW6020
IRON
13000
20
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B30-0030-0036-01
6/4/2022
35.65856
-108.49066
30
36
SW6020
LEAD
7.9
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B36-0030-0036-01
6/3/2022
35.658143
-108.491879
30
36
SW6020
LEAD
8.9
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B30-0030-0036-01
6/4/2022
35.65856
-108.49066
30
36
SW6020
MANGANESE
170
0.77
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B36-0030-0036-01
6/3/2022
35.658143
-108.491879
30
36
SW6020
MANGANESE
220
0.74
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B30-0030-0036-01
6/4/2022
35.65856
-108.49066
30
36
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
1.2
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B36-0030-0036-01
6/3/2022
35.658143
-108.491879
30
36
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.58
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B30-0030-0036-01
6/4/2022
35.65856
-108.49066
30
36
SW6020
NICKEL
6.6
2.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B36-0030-0036-01
6/3/2022
35.658143
-108.491879
30
36
SW6020
NICKEL
7.1
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B30-0030-0036-01
6/4/2022
35.65856
-108.49066
30
36
713R15
Ra-226
0.78 J
0.39
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KM P-S B36-0030-0036-01
6/3/2022
35.658143
-108.491879
30
36
713R15
Ra-226
30.7
1
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KM P-S B30-0030-0036-01
6/4/2022
35.65856
-108.49066
30
36
SW6020
SELENIUM
2.9
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B36-0030-0036-01
6/3/2022
35.658143
-108.491879
30
36
SW6020
SELENIUM
2.4
0.99
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B30-0030-0036-01
6/4/2022
35.65856
-108.49066
30
36
SW6020
SILVER
0.058 U
0.12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B36-0030-0036-01
6/3/2022
35.658143
-108.491879
30
36
SW6020
SILVER
0.056 UJ
0.11
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B30-0030-0036-01
6/4/2022
35.65856
-108.49066
30
36
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.12
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B36-0030-0036-01
6/3/2022
35.658143
-108.491879
30
36
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.12
0.0099
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B30-0030-0036-01
6/4/2022
35.65856
-108.49066
30
36
SW6020
URANIUM
0.86
0.021
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B36-0030-0036-01
6/3/2022
35.658143
-108.491879
30
36
SW6020
URANIUM
24
0.02
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B30-0030-0036-01
6/4/2022
35.65856
-108.49066
30
36
SW6020
VANADIUM
12
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B36-0030-0036-01
6/3/2022
35.658143
-108.491879
30
36
SW6020
VANADIUM
14
0.49
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B30-0030-0036-01
6/4/2022
35.65856
-108.49066
30
36
SW6020
ZINC
32
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B36-0030-0036-01
6/3/2022
35.658143
-108.491879
30
36
SW6020
ZINC
38
9.9
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0036-0042-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
36
42
SW6020
ALUMINUM
5600
16
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B38-0036-0042-01
6/3/2022
35.657432
-108.490829
36
42
SW6020
ALUMINUM
7900
15
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0036-0042-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
36
42
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.063 J
0.11
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B38-0036-0042-01
6/3/2022
35.657432
-108.490829
36
42
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.11 J
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-16-36
7/18/2017
35.658292
-108.491842
36
42
Unknown
ARSENIC
5
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-17-36
7/19/2017
35.658397
-108.491778
36
42
Unknown
ARSENIC
4.7
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-18-36
7/19/2017
35.658584
-108.491524
36
42
Unknown
ARSENIC
4.7
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-19-36
7/19/2017
35.65865
-108.491373
36
42
Unknown
ARSENIC
5.3
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-20-36
7/19/2017
35.658809
-108.491224
36
42
Unknown
ARSENIC
7.5
Unknown
mg/kg
Page 73 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMPUNC
KMP-21-36
7/19/2017
35.658901
-108.491165
36
42
Unknown
ARSENIC
5.3
Unknown
mg/kg
KMPUNC
KMP-22-36
7/19/2017
35.658405
-108.490563
36
42
Unknown
ARSENIC
4
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-23-36
7/18/2017
35.658984
-108.490548
36
42
Unknown
ARSENIC
4.9
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0036-0042-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
36
42
SW6020
ARSENIC
4.9
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B38-0036-0042-01
6/3/2022
35.657432
-108.490829
36
42
SW6020
ARSENIC
6.8
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-16-36
7/18/2017
35.658292
-108.491842
36
42
Unknown
BARIUM
51
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-17-36
7/19/2017
35.658397
-108.491778
36
42
Unknown
BARIUM
43
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-18-36
7/19/2017
35.658584
-108.491524
36
42
Unknown
BARIUM
43
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-19-36
7/19/2017
35.65865
-108.491373
36
42
Unknown
BARIUM
55
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-20-36
7/19/2017
35.658809
-108.491224
36
42
Unknown
BARIUM
69
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-21-36
7/19/2017
35.658901
-108.491165
36
42
Unknown
BARIUM
57
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-22-36
7/19/2017
35.658405
-108.490563
36
42
Unknown
BARIUM
40
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-23-36
7/18/2017
35.658984
-108.490548
36
42
Unknown
BARIUM
54
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB28-0036-0042-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
36
42
SW6020
BARIUM
45
0.53
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB38-0036-0042-01
6/3/2022
35.657432
-108.490829
36
42
SW6020
BARIUM
83
0.52
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB28-0036-0042-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
36
42
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.47
0.053
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB38-0036-0042-01
6/3/2022
35.657432
-108.490829
36
42
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.6
0.052
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-16-36
7/18/2017
35.658292
-108.491842
36
42
Unknown
CADMIUM
0.12 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-17-36
7/19/2017
35.658397
-108.491778
36
42
Unknown
CADMIUM
0.12 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-18-36
7/19/2017
35.658584
-108.491524
36
42
Unknown
CADMIUM
0.13 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-19-36
7/19/2017
35.65865
-108.491373
36
42
Unknown
CADMIUM
0.13 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-20-36
7/19/2017
35.658809
-108.491224
36
42
Unknown
CADMIUM
0.076 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-21-36
7/19/2017
35.658901
-108.491165
36
42
Unknown
CADMIUM
0.067 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-22-36
7/19/2017
35.658405
-108.490563
36
42
Unknown
CADMIUM
0.12 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-23-36
7/18/2017
35.658984
-108.490548
36
42
Unknown
CADMIUM
0.13 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB28-0036-0042-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
36
42
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.053 J
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB38-0036-0042-01
6/3/2022
35.657432
-108.490829
36
42
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.079 J
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-16-36
7/18/2017
35.658292
-108.491842
36
42
Unknown
CHROMIUM
7.5
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-17-36
7/19/2017
35.658397
-108.491778
36
42
Unknown
CHROMIUM
6.9
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-18-36
7/19/2017
35.658584
-108.491524
36
42
Unknown
CHROMIUM
7.7
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-19-36
7/19/2017
35.65865
-108.491373
36
42
Unknown
CHROMIUM
7.4
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-20-36
7/19/2017
35.658809
-108.491224
36
42
Unknown
CHROMIUM
7.4
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-21-36
7/19/2017
35.658901
-108.491165
36
42
Unknown
CHROMIUM
8
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-22-36
7/19/2017
35.658405
-108.490563
36
42
Unknown
CHROMIUM
5.8
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-23-36
7/18/2017
35.658984
-108.490548
36
42
Unknown
CHROMIUM
8.2
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB28-0036-0042-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
36
42
SW6020
CHROMIUM
6.1
1.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB38-0036-0042-01
6/3/2022
35.657432
-108.490829
36
42
SW6020
CHROMIUM
8.6
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB28-0036-0042-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
36
42
SW6020
COBALT
4.4
0.53
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB38-0036-0042-01
6/3/2022
35.657432
-108.490829
36
42
SW6020
COBALT
6.3
0.52
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB28-0036-0042-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
36
42
SW6020
COPPER
6.7
2.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB38-0036-0042-01
6/3/2022
35.657432
-108.490829
36
42
SW6020
COPPER
11
2.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB28-0036-0042-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
36
42
SW6020
IRON
12000
21
mg/kg
Page 74 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMPUNC
KM P-S B38-0036-0042-01
6/3/2022
35.657432
-108.490829
36
42
SW6020
IRON
17000
21
mg/kg
KMPUNC
KMP-16-36
7/18/2017
35.658292
-108.491842
36
42
Unknown
LEAD
8.3
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-17-36
7/19/2017
35.658397
-108.491778
36
42
Unknown
LEAD
7.3
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-18-36
7/19/2017
35.658584
-108.491524
36
42
Unknown
LEAD
8
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-19-36
7/19/2017
35.65865
-108.491373
36
42
Unknown
LEAD
7
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-20-36
7/19/2017
35.658809
-108.491224
36
42
Unknown
LEAD
12
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-21-36
7/19/2017
35.658901
-108.491165
36
42
Unknown
LEAD
8.9
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-22-36
7/19/2017
35.658405
-108.490563
36
42
Unknown
LEAD
6.4
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-23-36
7/18/2017
35.658984
-108.490548
36
42
Unknown
LEAD
8.2
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB28-0036-0042-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
36
42
SW6020
LEAD
7.9
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB38-0036-0042-01
6/3/2022
35.657432
-108.490829
36
42
SW6020
LEAD
11
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB28-0036-0042-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
36
42
SW6020
MANGANESE
170
0.8
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB38-0036-0042-01
6/3/2022
35.657432
-108.490829
36
42
SW6020
MANGANESE
230
0.77
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-16-36
7/18/2017
35.658292
-108.491842
36
42
Unknown
MOLYBDENUM
0.63 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-17-36
7/19/2017
35.658397
-108.491778
36
42
Unknown
MOLYBDENUM
0.58 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-18-36
7/19/2017
35.658584
-108.491524
36
42
Unknown
MOLYBDENUM
0.65 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-19-36
7/19/2017
35.65865
-108.491373
36
42
Unknown
MOLYBDENUM
0.67 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-20-36
7/19/2017
35.658809
-108.491224
36
42
Unknown
MOLYBDENUM
1.1 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-21-36
7/19/2017
35.658901
-108.491165
36
42
Unknown
MOLYBDENUM
0.75 J
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-22-36
7/19/2017
35.658405
-108.490563
36
42
Unknown
MOLYBDENUM
1.2 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-23-36
7/18/2017
35.658984
-108.490548
36
42
Unknown
MOLYBDENUM
1.3
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB28-0036-0042-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
36
42
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
1.7
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB38-0036-0042-01
6/3/2022
35.657432
-108.490829
36
42
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.33 J
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB28-0036-0042-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
36
42
SW6020
NICKEL
6.5
2.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB38-0036-0042-01
6/3/2022
35.657432
-108.490829
36
42
SW6020
NICKEL
9.4
2.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-16-36
7/18/2017
35.658292
-108.491842
36
42
Unknown
Ra-226
1.7
Unknown
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KMP-17-36
7/19/2017
35.658397
-108.491778
36
42
Unknown
Ra-226
3.4
Unknown
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KMP-18-36
7/19/2017
35.658584
-108.491524
36
42
Unknown
Ra-226
1.3
Unknown
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KMP-19-36
7/19/2017
35.65865
-108.491373
36
42
Unknown
Ra-226
1.7
Unknown
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KMP-20-36
7/19/2017
35.658809
-108.491224
36
42
Unknown
Ra-226
1.3
Unknown
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KMP-21-36
7/19/2017
35.658901
-108.491165
36
42
Unknown
Ra-226
1.6
Unknown
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KMP-22-36
7/19/2017
35.658405
-108.490563
36
42
Unknown
Ra-226
0.9
Unknown
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KMP-23-36
7/18/2017
35.658984
-108.490548
36
42
Unknown
Ra-226
1.3
Unknown
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0036-0042-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
36
42
713R15
Ra-226
0.93 J
0.39
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KM P-S B38-0036-0042-01
6/3/2022
35.657432
-108.490829
36
42
713R15
Ra-226
1.14 J
0.45
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KMP-16-36
7/18/2017
35.658292
-108.491842
36
42
Unknown
SELENIUM
1.4
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-17-36
7/19/2017
35.658397
-108.491778
36
42
Unknown
SELENIUM
2.3
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-18-36
7/19/2017
35.658584
-108.491524
36
42
Unknown
SELENIUM
1.7
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-19-36
7/19/2017
35.65865
-108.491373
36
42
Unknown
SELENIUM
2
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-20-36
7/19/2017
35.658809
-108.491224
36
42
Unknown
SELENIUM
1.5
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-21-36
7/19/2017
35.658901
-108.491165
36
42
Unknown
SELENIUM
2.1
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-22-36
7/19/2017
35.658405
-108.490563
36
42
Unknown
SELENIUM
1.4
Unknown
mg/kg
Page 75 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMPUNC
KMP-23-36
7/18/2017
35.658984
-108.490548
36
42
Unknown
SELENIUM
1.5
Unknown
mg/kg
KMPUNC
KM P-S B28-0036-0042-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
36
42
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.1 J
1.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B38-0036-0042-01
6/3/2022
35.657432
-108.490829
36
42
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.3
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-16-36
7/18/2017
35.658292
-108.491842
36
42
Unknown
SILVER
0.48 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-17-36
7/19/2017
35.658397
-108.491778
36
42
Unknown
SILVER
0.47 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-18-36
7/19/2017
35.658584
-108.491524
36
42
Unknown
SILVER
0.5 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-19-36
7/19/2017
35.65865
-108.491373
36
42
Unknown
SILVER
0.5 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-20-36
7/19/2017
35.658809
-108.491224
36
42
Unknown
SILVER
0.5 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-21-36
7/19/2017
35.658901
-108.491165
36
42
Unknown
SILVER
0.5 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-22-36
7/19/2017
35.658405
-108.490563
36
42
Unknown
SILVER
0.5 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-23-36
7/18/2017
35.658984
-108.490548
36
42
Unknown
SILVER
0.52 U
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0036-0042-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
36
42
SW6020
SILVER
0.061 U
0.12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B38-0036-0042-01
6/3/2022
35.657432
-108.490829
36
42
SW6020
SILVER
0.059 UJ
0.12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0036-0042-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
36
42
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.11
0.011
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB38-0036-0042-01
6/3/2022
35.657432
-108.490829
36
42
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.15
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-16-36
7/18/2017
35.658292
-108.491842
36
42
Unknown
URANIUM
37
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-17-36
7/19/2017
35.658397
-108.491778
36
42
Unknown
URANIUM
58
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-18-36
7/19/2017
35.658584
-108.491524
36
42
Unknown
URANIUM
38
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-19-36
7/19/2017
35.65865
-108.491373
36
42
Unknown
URANIUM
32
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-20-36
7/19/2017
35.658809
-108.491224
36
42
Unknown
URANIUM
32
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-21-36
7/19/2017
35.658901
-108.491165
36
42
Unknown
URANIUM
22
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-22-36
7/19/2017
35.658405
-108.490563
36
42
Unknown
URANIUM
0.77
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-23-36
7/18/2017
35.658984
-108.490548
36
42
Unknown
URANIUM
52
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB28-0036-0042-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
36
42
SW6020
URANIUM
180
0.021
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB38-0036-0042-01
6/3/2022
35.657432
-108.490829
36
42
SW6020
URANIUM
0.63
0.021
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-16-36
7/18/2017
35.658292
-108.491842
36
42
Unknown
VANADIUM
16
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-17-36
7/19/2017
35.658397
-108.491778
36
42
Unknown
VANADIUM
16
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-18-36
7/19/2017
35.658584
-108.491524
36
42
Unknown
VANADIUM
16
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-19-36
7/19/2017
35.65865
-108.491373
36
42
Unknown
VANADIUM
17
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-20-36
7/19/2017
35.658809
-108.491224
36
42
Unknown
VANADIUM
17
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-21-36
7/19/2017
35.658901
-108.491165
36
42
Unknown
VANADIUM
17
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-22-36
7/19/2017
35.658405
-108.490563
36
42
Unknown
VANADIUM
13
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-23-36
7/18/2017
35.658984
-108.490548
36
42
Unknown
VANADIUM
16
Unknown
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0036-0042-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
36
42
SW6020
VANADIUM
12
0.53
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B38-0036-0042-01
6/3/2022
35.657432
-108.490829
36
42
SW6020
VANADIUM
16
0.52
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0036-0042-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
36
42
SW6020
ZINC
32
11
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B38-0036-0042-01
6/3/2022
35.657432
-108.490829
36
42
SW6020
ZINC
48
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0042-0048-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
42
48
SW6020
ALUMINUM
6400
16
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0042-0048-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
42
48
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.065 J
0.11
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0042-0048-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
42
48
SW6020
ARSENIC
5.4
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0042-0048-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
42
48
SW6020
BARIUM
57
0.53
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0042-0048-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
42
48
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.53
0.053
mg/kg
Page 76 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMPUNC
KM P-S B28-0042-0048-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
42
48
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.064 J
0.21
mg/kg
KMPUNC
KM P-S B28-0042-0048-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
42
48
SW6020
CHROMIUM
6.8
1.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0042-0048-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
42
48
SW6020
COBALT
4.7
0.53
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0042-0048-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
42
48
SW6020
COPPER
7.4
2.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0042-0048-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
42
48
SW6020
IRON
14000
21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0042-0048-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
42
48
SW6020
LEAD
8.6
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0042-0048-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
42
48
SW6020
MANGANESE
200
0.8
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0042-0048-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
42
48
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
1.4
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0042-0048-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
42
48
SW6020
NICKEL
7.3
2.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0042-0048-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
42
48
713R15
Ra-226
0.93 J
0.44
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0042-0048-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
42
48
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.1
1.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0042-0048-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
42
48
SW6020
SILVER
0.061 U
0.12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0042-0048-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
42
48
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.13
0.011
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0042-0048-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
42
48
SW6020
URANIUM
190
0.021
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0042-0048-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
42
48
SW6020
VANADIUM
13
0.53
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0042-0048-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
42
48
SW6020
ZINC
36
11
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B24-0048-0054-01
6/3/2022
35.658718
-108.492772
48
54
SW6020
ALUMINUM
9600
16
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B29-0048-0054-01
6/4/2022
35.65859
-108.490409
48
54
SW6020
ALUMINUM
5000
15
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB29-0048-0054-02
6/4/2022
35.65859
-108.490409
48
54
SW6020
ALUMINUM
5300
15
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B34-0048-0054-01
6/3/2022
35.658631
-108.491402
48
54
SW6020
ALUMINUM
5400
16
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B24-0048-0054-01
6/3/2022
35.658718
-108.492772
48
54
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.11 J
0.11
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B29-0048-0054-01
6/4/2022
35.65859
-108.490409
48
54
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.063 J
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB29-0048-0054-02
6/4/2022
35.65859
-108.490409
48
54
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.058 J
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B34-0048-0054-01
6/3/2022
35.658631
-108.491402
48
54
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.05 J
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B24-0048-0054-01
6/3/2022
35.658718
-108.492772
48
54
SW6020
ARSENIC
8.5
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B29-0048-0054-01
6/4/2022
35.65859
-108.490409
48
54
SW6020
ARSENIC
4.9
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB29-0048-0054-02
6/4/2022
35.65859
-108.490409
48
54
SW6020
ARSENIC
5
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B34-0048-0054-01
6/3/2022
35.658631
-108.491402
48
54
SW6020
ARSENIC
4.8
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B24-0048-0054-01
6/3/2022
35.658718
-108.492772
48
54
SW6020
BARIUM
110
0.54
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B29-0048-0054-01
6/4/2022
35.65859
-108.490409
48
54
SW6020
BARIUM
60
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB29-0048-0054-02
6/4/2022
35.65859
-108.490409
48
54
SW6020
BARIUM
55
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B34-0048-0054-01
6/3/2022
35.658631
-108.491402
48
54
SW6020
BARIUM
41
0.52
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B24-0048-0054-01
6/3/2022
35.658718
-108.492772
48
54
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.85
0.054
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B29-0048-0054-01
6/4/2022
35.65859
-108.490409
48
54
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.42
0.051
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB29-0048-0054-02
6/4/2022
35.65859
-108.490409
48
54
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.43
0.051
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB34-0048-0054-01
6/3/2022
35.658631
-108.491402
48
54
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.45
0.052
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB24-0048-0054-01
6/3/2022
35.658718
-108.492772
48
54
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.1 J
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB29-0048-0054-01
6/4/2022
35.65859
-108.490409
48
54
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.043 J
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB29-0048-0054-02
6/4/2022
35.65859
-108.490409
48
54
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.048 J
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB34-0048-0054-01
6/3/2022
35.658631
-108.491402
48
54
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.05 J
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB24-0048-0054-01
6/3/2022
35.658718
-108.492772
48
54
SW6020
CHROMIUM
11
1.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB29-0048-0054-01
6/4/2022
35.65859
-108.490409
48
54
SW6020
CHROMIUM
5.6
1
mg/kg
Page 77 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMPUNC
KMP-SB29-0048-0054-02
6/4/2022
35.65859
-108.490409
48
54
SW6020
CHROMIUM
5.6
1
mg/kg
KMPUNC
KM P-S B34-0048-0054-01
6/3/2022
35.658631
-108.491402
48
54
SW6020
CHROMIUM
6
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B24-0048-0054-01
6/3/2022
35.658718
-108.492772
48
54
SW6020
COBALT
7.9
0.54
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B29-0048-0054-01
6/4/2022
35.65859
-108.490409
48
54
SW6020
COBALT
4.1
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB29-0048-0054-02
6/4/2022
35.65859
-108.490409
48
54
SW6020
COBALT
3.9
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B34-0048-0054-01
6/3/2022
35.658631
-108.491402
48
54
SW6020
COBALT
4.3
0.52
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B24-0048-0054-01
6/3/2022
35.658718
-108.492772
48
54
SW6020
COPPER
14
2.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B29-0048-0054-01
6/4/2022
35.65859
-108.490409
48
54
SW6020
COPPER
5.5
2.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB29-0048-0054-02
6/4/2022
35.65859
-108.490409
48
54
SW6020
COPPER
5.6
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B34-0048-0054-01
6/3/2022
35.658631
-108.491402
48
54
SW6020
COPPER
6.9
2.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B24-0048-0054-01
6/3/2022
35.658718
-108.492772
48
54
SW6020
IRON
22000
21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B29-0048-0054-01
6/4/2022
35.65859
-108.490409
48
54
SW6020
IRON
13000
21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB29-0048-0054-02
6/4/2022
35.65859
-108.490409
48
54
SW6020
IRON
14000
20
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B34-0048-0054-01
6/3/2022
35.658631
-108.491402
48
54
SW6020
IRON
12000
21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B24-0048-0054-01
6/3/2022
35.658718
-108.492772
48
54
SW6020
LEAD
15
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B29-0048-0054-01
6/4/2022
35.65859
-108.490409
48
54
SW6020
LEAD
7.3
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB29-0048-0054-02
6/4/2022
35.65859
-108.490409
48
54
SW6020
LEAD
7.4
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B34-0048-0054-01
6/3/2022
35.658631
-108.491402
48
54
SW6020
LEAD
8.1
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B24-0048-0054-01
6/3/2022
35.658718
-108.492772
48
54
SW6020
MANGANESE
300
0.8
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B29-0048-0054-01
6/4/2022
35.65859
-108.490409
48
54
SW6020
MANGANESE
290
0.77
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB29-0048-0054-02
6/4/2022
35.65859
-108.490409
48
54
SW6020
MANGANESE
310
0.77
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B34-0048-0054-01
6/3/2022
35.658631
-108.491402
48
54
SW6020
MANGANESE
170
0.78
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B24-0048-0054-01
6/3/2022
35.658718
-108.492772
48
54
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.53 J
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B29-0048-0054-01
6/4/2022
35.65859
-108.490409
48
54
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.39
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB29-0048-0054-02
6/4/2022
35.65859
-108.490409
48
54
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.34
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B34-0048-0054-01
6/3/2022
35.658631
-108.491402
48
54
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.44
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B24-0048-0054-01
6/3/2022
35.658718
-108.492772
48
54
SW6020
NICKEL
12
2.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B29-0048-0054-01
6/4/2022
35.65859
-108.490409
48
54
SW6020
NICKEL
5.9
2.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB29-0048-0054-02
6/4/2022
35.65859
-108.490409
48
54
SW6020
NICKEL
6.1
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B34-0048-0054-01
6/3/2022
35.658631
-108.491402
48
54
SW6020
NICKEL
6.3
2.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B24-0048-0054-01
6/3/2022
35.658718
-108.492772
48
54
713R15
Ra-226
1.56 J
0.53
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KM P-S B29-0048-0054-01
6/4/2022
35.65859
-108.490409
48
54
713R15
Ra-226
0.82 J
0.48
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KMP-SB29-0048-0054-02
6/4/2022
35.65859
-108.490409
48
54
713R15
Ra-226
0.8 J
0.44
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KM P-S B34-0048-0054-01
6/3/2022
35.658631
-108.491402
48
54
713R15
Ra-226
3.57
0.47
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KM P-S B24-0048-0054-01
6/3/2022
35.658718
-108.492772
48
54
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.8
1.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B29-0048-0054-01
6/4/2022
35.65859
-108.490409
48
54
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.1
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB29-0048-0054-02
6/4/2022
35.65859
-108.490409
48
54
SW6020
SELENIUM
0.98 J
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B34-0048-0054-01
6/3/2022
35.658631
-108.491402
48
54
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.5
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B24-0048-0054-01
6/3/2022
35.658718
-108.492772
48
54
SW6020
SILVER
0.11 J
0.12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB29-0048-0054-01
6/4/2022
35.65859
-108.490409
48
54
SW6020
SILVER
0.059 U
0.12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB29-0048-0054-02
6/4/2022
35.65859
-108.490409
48
54
SW6020
SILVER
0.058 U
0.12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB34-0048-0054-01
6/3/2022
35.658631
-108.491402
48
54
SW6020
SILVER
0.059 U
0.12
mg/kg
Page 78 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMPUNC
KM P-S B24-0048-0054-01
6/3/2022
35.658718
-108.492772
48
54
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.21
0.011
mg/kg
KMPUNC
KM P-S B29-0048-0054-01
6/4/2022
35.65859
-108.490409
48
54
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.1
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB29-0048-0054-02
6/4/2022
35.65859
-108.490409
48
54
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.1
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B34-0048-0054-01
6/3/2022
35.658631
-108.491402
48
54
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.12
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B24-0048-0054-01
6/3/2022
35.658718
-108.492772
48
54
SW6020
URANIUM
1.1
0.021
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B29-0048-0054-01
6/4/2022
35.65859
-108.490409
48
54
SW6020
URANIUM
0.59
0.021
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB29-0048-0054-02
6/4/2022
35.65859
-108.490409
48
54
SW6020
URANIUM
0.58
0.02
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B34-0048-0054-01
6/3/2022
35.658631
-108.491402
48
54
SW6020
URANIUM
20
0.021
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B24-0048-0054-01
6/3/2022
35.658718
-108.492772
48
54
SW6020
VANADIUM
20
0.54
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B29-0048-0054-01
6/4/2022
35.65859
-108.490409
48
54
SW6020
VANADIUM
13
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB29-0048-0054-02
6/4/2022
35.65859
-108.490409
48
54
SW6020
VANADIUM
13
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B34-0048-0054-01
6/3/2022
35.658631
-108.491402
48
54
SW6020
VANADIUM
12
0.52
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B24-0048-0054-01
6/3/2022
35.658718
-108.492772
48
54
SW6020
ZINC
60
11
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B29-0048-0054-01
6/4/2022
35.65859
-108.490409
48
54
SW6020
ZINC
31
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB29-0048-0054-02
6/4/2022
35.65859
-108.490409
48
54
SW6020
ZINC
31
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B34-0048-0054-01
6/3/2022
35.658631
-108.491402
48
54
SW6020
ZINC
34
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0054-0060-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
54
60
SW6020
ALUMINUM
5600
16
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B41-0054-0060-01
6/4/2022
35.659569
-108.491192
54
60
SW6020
ALUMINUM
7600
16
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B42-0054-0060-01
6/8/2022
35.659569
-108.492026
54
60
SW6020
ALUMINUM
7900
16
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0054-0060-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
54
60
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.043 J
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B41-0054-0060-01
6/4/2022
35.659569
-108.491192
54
60
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.087 J
0.11
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B42-0054-0060-01
6/8/2022
35.659569
-108.492026
54
60
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.099 J
0.11
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0054-0060-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
54
60
SW6020
ARSENIC
5.1
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B41-0054-0060-01
6/4/2022
35.659569
-108.491192
54
60
SW6020
ARSENIC
6
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B42-0054-0060-01
6/8/2022
35.659569
-108.492026
54
60
SW6020
ARSENIC
6.4
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0054-0060-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
54
60
SW6020
BARIUM
44
0.52
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B41-0054-0060-01
6/4/2022
35.659569
-108.491192
54
60
SW6020
BARIUM
90
0.53
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B42-0054-0060-01
6/8/2022
35.659569
-108.492026
54
60
SW6020
BARIUM
86
0.54
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0054-0060-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
54
60
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.47
0.052
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B41-0054-0060-01
6/4/2022
35.659569
-108.491192
54
60
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.61
0.053
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B42-0054-0060-01
6/8/2022
35.659569
-108.492026
54
60
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.69
0.054
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0054-0060-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
54
60
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.05 J
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B41-0054-0060-01
6/4/2022
35.659569
-108.491192
54
60
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.063 J
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B42-0054-0060-01
6/8/2022
35.659569
-108.492026
54
60
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.081 J
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0054-0060-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
54
60
SW6020
CHROMIUM
6
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B41-0054-0060-01
6/4/2022
35.659569
-108.491192
54
60
SW6020
CHROMIUM
8
1.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B42-0054-0060-01
6/8/2022
35.659569
-108.492026
54
60
SW6020
CHROMIUM
8.5
1.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0054-0060-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
54
60
SW6020
COBALT
4.5
0.52
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB41 -0054-0060-01
6/4/2022
35.659569
-108.491192
54
60
SW6020
COBALT
5.5
0.53
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB42-0054-0060-01
6/8/2022
35.659569
-108.492026
54
60
SW6020
COBALT
6.2
0.54
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB33-0054-0060-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
54
60
SW6020
COPPER
6.8
2.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB41 -0054-0060-01
6/4/2022
35.659569
-108.491192
54
60
SW6020
COPPER
9.6
2.1
mg/kg
Page 79 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMPUNC
KM P-S B42-0054-0060-01
6/8/2022
35.659569
-108.492026
54
60
SW6020
COPPER
11
2.1
mg/kg
KMPUNC
KM P-S B33-0054-0060-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
54
60
SW6020
IRON
13000
21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B41-0054-0060-01
6/4/2022
35.659569
-108.491192
54
60
SW6020
IRON
15000
21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B42-0054-0060-01
6/8/2022
35.659569
-108.492026
54
60
SW6020
IRON
17000
21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0054-0060-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
54
60
SW6020
LEAD
7.8
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B41-0054-0060-01
6/4/2022
35.659569
-108.491192
54
60
SW6020
LEAD
10
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B42-0054-0060-01
6/8/2022
35.659569
-108.492026
54
60
SW6020
LEAD
11
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0054-0060-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
54
60
SW6020
MANGANESE
190
0.78
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B41-0054-0060-01
6/4/2022
35.659569
-108.491192
54
60
SW6020
MANGANESE
240
0.8
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B42-0054-0060-01
6/8/2022
35.659569
-108.492026
54
60
SW6020
MANGANESE
240
0.81
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0054-0060-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
54
60
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.3
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B41-0054-0060-01
6/4/2022
35.659569
-108.491192
54
60
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.41
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B42-0054-0060-01
6/8/2022
35.659569
-108.492026
54
60
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.39
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0054-0060-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
54
60
SW6020
NICKEL
6.7
2.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B41-0054-0060-01
6/4/2022
35.659569
-108.491192
54
60
SW6020
NICKEL
8.6
2.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B42-0054-0060-01
6/8/2022
35.659569
-108.492026
54
60
SW6020
NICKEL
9.3
2.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0054-0060-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
54
60
713R15
Ra-226
0.7 J
0.44
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KM P-S B41-0054-0060-01
6/4/2022
35.659569
-108.491192
54
60
713R15
Ra-226
1.48 J
0.54
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KM P-S B42-0054-0060-01
6/8/2022
35.659569
-108.492026
54
60
713R15
Ra-226
1.05 J
0.5
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0054-0060-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
54
60
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.1
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B41-0054-0060-01
6/4/2022
35.659569
-108.491192
54
60
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.3
1.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B42-0054-0060-01
6/8/2022
35.659569
-108.492026
54
60
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.4
1.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0054-0060-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
54
60
SW6020
SILVER
0.059 U
0.12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B41-0054-0060-01
6/4/2022
35.659569
-108.491192
54
60
SW6020
SILVER
0.061 U
0.12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B42-0054-0060-01
6/8/2022
35.659569
-108.492026
54
60
SW6020
SILVER
0.061 U
0.12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0054-0060-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
54
60
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.12
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B41-0054-0060-01
6/4/2022
35.659569
-108.491192
54
60
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.16
0.011
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B42-0054-0060-01
6/8/2022
35.659569
-108.492026
54
60
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.17
0.011
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0054-0060-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
54
60
SW6020
URANIUM
0.66
0.021
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B41-0054-0060-01
6/4/2022
35.659569
-108.491192
54
60
SW6020
URANIUM
0.76
0.021
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B42-0054-0060-01
6/8/2022
35.659569
-108.492026
54
60
SW6020
URANIUM
1
0.021
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0054-0060-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
54
60
SW6020
VANADIUM
12
0.52
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B41-0054-0060-01
6/4/2022
35.659569
-108.491192
54
60
SW6020
VANADIUM
15
0.53
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B42-0054-0060-01
6/8/2022
35.659569
-108.492026
54
60
SW6020
VANADIUM
17
0.54
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0054-0060-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
54
60
SW6020
ZINC
33
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B41-0054-0060-01
6/4/2022
35.659569
-108.491192
54
60
SW6020
ZINC
43
11
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B42-0054-0060-01
6/8/2022
35.659569
-108.492026
54
60
SW6020
ZINC
47
11
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
60
66
SW6020
ALUMINUM
5900
16
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB28-0060-0066-02
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
60
66
SW6020
ALUMINUM
5900
16
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB31-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658122
-108.490535
60
66
SW6020
ALUMINUM
6900
16
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B32-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658833
-108.491113
60
66
SW6020
ALUMINUM
5500
15
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0060-0066-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
60
66
SW6020
ALUMINUM
5000
15
mg/kg
Page 80 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMPUNC
KM P-S B28-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
60
66
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.063 J
0.11
mg/kg
KMPUNC
KMP-SB28-0060-0066-02
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
60
66
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.063 J
0.11
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB31-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658122
-108.490535
60
66
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.057 J
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B32-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658833
-108.491113
60
66
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.049 J
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0060-0066-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
60
66
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.042 J
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
60
66
SW6020
ARSENIC
6.3
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB28-0060-0066-02
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
60
66
SW6020
ARSENIC
5.3
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB31-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658122
-108.490535
60
66
SW6020
ARSENIC
6.3
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B32-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658833
-108.491113
60
66
SW6020
ARSENIC
5
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0060-0066-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
60
66
SW6020
ARSENIC
4.6
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
60
66
SW6020
BARIUM
50
0.53
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB28-0060-0066-02
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
60
66
SW6020
BARIUM
49
0.53
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB31-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658122
-108.490535
60
66
SW6020
BARIUM
59
0.52
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B32-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658833
-108.491113
60
66
SW6020
BARIUM
46
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0060-0066-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
60
66
SW6020
BARIUM
35
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
60
66
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.52
0.053
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB28-0060-0066-02
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
60
66
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.5
0.053
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB31-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658122
-108.490535
60
66
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.61
0.052
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B32-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658833
-108.491113
60
66
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.46
0.051
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0060-0066-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
60
66
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.43
0.051
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
60
66
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.051 J
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB28-0060-0066-02
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
60
66
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.051 J
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB31-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658122
-108.490535
60
66
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.061 J
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B32-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658833
-108.491113
60
66
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.051 J
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0060-0066-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
60
66
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.044 J
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
60
66
SW6020
CHROMIUM
6.5
1.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB28-0060-0066-02
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
60
66
SW6020
CHROMIUM
6.4
1.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB31-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658122
-108.490535
60
66
SW6020
CHROMIUM
7.8
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B32-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658833
-108.491113
60
66
SW6020
CHROMIUM
8.2
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0060-0066-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
60
66
SW6020
CHROMIUM
7.7
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
60
66
SW6020
COBALT
5.2
0.53
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB28-0060-0066-02
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
60
66
SW6020
COBALT
5
0.53
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB31-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658122
-108.490535
60
66
SW6020
COBALT
5.7
0.52
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B32-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658833
-108.491113
60
66
SW6020
COBALT
4.3
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0060-0066-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
60
66
SW6020
COBALT
4.3
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
60
66
SW6020
COPPER
7.1
2.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB28-0060-0066-02
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
60
66
SW6020
COPPER
7.1
2.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB31-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658122
-108.490535
60
66
SW6020
COPPER
9.8
2.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B32-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658833
-108.491113
60
66
SW6020
COPPER
7.2
2.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0060-0066-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
60
66
SW6020
COPPER
6.6
2.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
60
66
SW6020
IRON
14000
21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB28-0060-0066-02
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
60
66
SW6020
IRON
13000
21
mg/kg
Page 81 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMPUNC
KM P-SB31-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658122
-108.490535
60
66
SW6020
IRON
16000
21
mg/kg
KMPUNC
KM P-S B32-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658833
-108.491113
60
66
SW6020
IRON
12000
21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0060-0066-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
60
66
SW6020
IRON
12000
21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
60
66
SW6020
LEAD
00
CO
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB28-0060-0066-02
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
60
66
SW6020
LEAD
8.3
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB31-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658122
-108.490535
60
66
SW6020
LEAD
11
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B32-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658833
-108.491113
60
66
SW6020
LEAD
8.1
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0060-0066-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
60
66
SW6020
LEAD
7.2
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
60
66
SW6020
MANGANESE
190
0.79
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB28-0060-0066-02
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
60
66
SW6020
MANGANESE
180
0.79
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB31-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658122
-108.490535
60
66
SW6020
MANGANESE
200
0.79
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B32-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658833
-108.491113
60
66
SW6020
MANGANESE
180
0.77
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0060-0066-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
60
66
SW6020
MANGANESE
190
0.77
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
60
66
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.37
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB28-0060-0066-02
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
60
66
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.38
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB31-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658122
-108.490535
60
66
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.36
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B32-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658833
-108.491113
60
66
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.91
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0060-0066-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
60
66
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.81
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
60
66
SW6020
NICKEL
7.2
2.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB28-0060-0066-02
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
60
66
SW6020
NICKEL
7
2.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB31-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658122
-108.490535
60
66
SW6020
NICKEL
00
CO
2.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B32-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658833
-108.491113
60
66
SW6020
NICKEL
6.6
2.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0060-0066-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
60
66
SW6020
NICKEL
6.3
2.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
60
66
713R15
Ra-226
0.88 J
0.32
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KMP-SB28-0060-0066-02
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
60
66
713R15
Ra-226
0.95 J
0.48
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KM P-SB31-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658122
-108.490535
60
66
713R15
Ra-226
1.43 J
0.47
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KM P-S B32-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658833
-108.491113
60
66
713R15
Ra-226
2.09
0.51
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0060-0066-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
60
66
713R15
Ra-226
1.02
0.37
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
60
66
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.2
1.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB28-0060-0066-02
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
60
66
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.1
1.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB31-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658122
-108.490535
60
66
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.4
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B32-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658833
-108.491113
60
66
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.6
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0060-0066-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
60
66
SW6020
SELENIUM
0.99 J
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
60
66
SW6020
SILVER
0.06 U
0.12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB28-0060-0066-02
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
60
66
SW6020
SILVER
0.06 U
0.12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB31-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658122
-108.490535
60
66
SW6020
SILVER
0.061 J
0.12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B32-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658833
-108.491113
60
66
SW6020
SILVER
0.059 U
0.12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0060-0066-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
60
66
SW6020
SILVER
0.058 U
0.12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
60
66
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.13
0.011
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB28-0060-0066-02
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
60
66
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.13
0.011
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB31 -0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658122
-108.490535
60
66
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.17
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB32-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658833
-108.491113
60
66
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.12
0.01
mg/kg
Page 82 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMPUNC
KM P-S B33-0060-0066-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
60
66
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.1
0.01
mg/kg
KMPUNC
KM P-S B28-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
60
66
SW6020
URANIUM
160
0.021
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB28-0060-0066-02
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
60
66
SW6020
URANIUM
150
0.021
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB31-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658122
-108.490535
60
66
SW6020
URANIUM
0.8
0.021
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B32-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658833
-108.491113
60
66
SW6020
URANIUM
14
0.021
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0060-0066-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
60
66
SW6020
URANIUM
1.9
0.021
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
60
66
SW6020
VANADIUM
13
0.53
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB28-0060-0066-02
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
60
66
SW6020
VANADIUM
12
0.53
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB31-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658122
-108.490535
60
66
SW6020
VANADIUM
14
0.52
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B32-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658833
-108.491113
60
66
SW6020
VANADIUM
13
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0060-0066-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
60
66
SW6020
VANADIUM
12
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B28-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
60
66
SW6020
ZINC
35
11
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KMP-SB28-0060-0066-02
6/4/2022
35.658964
-108.490576
60
66
SW6020
ZINC
35
11
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB31-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658122
-108.490535
60
66
SW6020
ZINC
44
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B32-0060-0066-01
6/4/2022
35.658833
-108.491113
60
66
SW6020
ZINC
33
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0060-0066-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
60
66
SW6020
ZINC
38
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B40-0054-0060-01
6/4/2022
35.659292
-108.49147
65
60
SW6020
ALUMINUM
6400
15
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B40-0054-0060-01
6/4/2022
35.659292
-108.49147
65
60
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.07 J
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B40-0054-0060-01
6/4/2022
35.659292
-108.49147
65
60
SW6020
ARSENIC
5.1
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B40-0054-0060-01
6/4/2022
35.659292
-108.49147
65
60
SW6020
BARIUM
55
0.52
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B40-0054-0060-01
6/4/2022
35.659292
-108.49147
65
60
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.51
0.052
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B40-0054-0060-01
6/4/2022
35.659292
-108.49147
65
60
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.06 J
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B40-0054-0060-01
6/4/2022
35.659292
-108.49147
65
60
SW6020
CHROMIUM
6.6
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B40-0054-0060-01
6/4/2022
35.659292
-108.49147
65
60
SW6020
COBALT
4.5
0.52
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B40-0054-0060-01
6/4/2022
35.659292
-108.49147
65
60
SW6020
COPPER
7.2
2.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B40-0054-0060-01
6/4/2022
35.659292
-108.49147
65
60
SW6020
IRON
13000
21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B40-0054-0060-01
6/4/2022
35.659292
-108.49147
65
60
SW6020
LEAD
8
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B40-0054-0060-01
6/4/2022
35.659292
-108.49147
65
60
SW6020
MANGANESE
190
0.77
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B40-0054-0060-01
6/4/2022
35.659292
-108.49147
65
60
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.32
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B40-0054-0060-01
6/4/2022
35.659292
-108.49147
65
60
SW6020
NICKEL
6.8
2.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B40-0054-0060-01
6/4/2022
35.659292
-108.49147
65
60
713R15
Ra-226
1.19
0.37
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KM P-S B40-0054-0060-01
6/4/2022
35.659292
-108.49147
65
60
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.3
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B40-0054-0060-01
6/4/2022
35.659292
-108.49147
65
60
SW6020
SILVER
0.059 U
0.12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B40-0054-0060-01
6/4/2022
35.659292
-108.49147
65
60
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.12
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B40-0054-0060-01
6/4/2022
35.659292
-108.49147
65
60
SW6020
URANIUM
28
0.021
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B40-0054-0060-01
6/4/2022
35.659292
-108.49147
65
60
SW6020
VANADIUM
13
0.52
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B40-0054-0060-01
6/4/2022
35.659292
-108.49147
65
60
SW6020
ZINC
34
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB33-0066-0072-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
66
72
SW6020
ALUMINUM
5500
15
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB37-0066-0072-01
6/3/2022
35.657957
-108.491269
66
72
SW6020
ALUMINUM
7000
15
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB33-0066-0072-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
66
72
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.046 J
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB37-0066-0072-01
6/3/2022
35.657957
-108.491269
66
72
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.099 J
0.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-SB33-0066-0072-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
66
72
SW6020
ARSENIC
4.9
0.2
mg/kg
Page 83 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
KMPUNC
KM P-S B37-0066-0072-01
6/3/2022
35.657957
-108.491269
66
72
SW6020
ARSENIC
6.2
0.21
mg/kg
KMPUNC
KM P-S B33-0066-0072-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
66
72
SW6020
BARIUM
47
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B37-0066-0072-01
6/3/2022
35.657957
-108.491269
66
72
SW6020
BARIUM
58
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0066-0072-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
66
72
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.44
0.05
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B37-0066-0072-01
6/3/2022
35.657957
-108.491269
66
72
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.57
0.051
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0066-0072-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
66
72
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.052 J
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B37-0066-0072-01
6/3/2022
35.657957
-108.491269
66
72
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.07 J
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0066-0072-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
66
72
SW6020
CHROMIUM
6.6
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B37-0066-0072-01
6/3/2022
35.657957
-108.491269
66
72
SW6020
CHROMIUM
7.5
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0066-0072-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
66
72
SW6020
COBALT
4.3
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B37-0066-0072-01
6/3/2022
35.657957
-108.491269
66
72
SW6020
COBALT
5.4
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0066-0072-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
66
72
SW6020
COPPER
7.2
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B37-0066-0072-01
6/3/2022
35.657957
-108.491269
66
72
SW6020
COPPER
9.5
2.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0066-0072-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
66
72
SW6020
IRON
12000
20
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B37-0066-0072-01
6/3/2022
35.657957
-108.491269
66
72
SW6020
IRON
15000
21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0066-0072-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
66
72
SW6020
LEAD
8.4
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B37-0066-0072-01
6/3/2022
35.657957
-108.491269
66
72
SW6020
LEAD
10
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0066-0072-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
66
72
SW6020
MANGANESE
180
0.75
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B37-0066-0072-01
6/3/2022
35.657957
-108.491269
66
72
SW6020
MANGANESE
200
0.77
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0066-0072-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
66
72
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.41
0.2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B37-0066-0072-01
6/3/2022
35.657957
-108.491269
66
72
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.39
0.21
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0066-0072-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
66
72
SW6020
NICKEL
6.4
2
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B37-0066-0072-01
6/3/2022
35.657957
-108.491269
66
72
SW6020
NICKEL
8.2
2.1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0066-0072-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
66
72
713R15
Ra-226
4.55
0.52
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KM P-S B37-0066-0072-01
6/3/2022
35.657957
-108.491269
66
72
713R15
Ra-226
8.7 J
0.6
pCi/g
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0066-0072-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
66
72
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.7
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B37-0066-0072-01
6/3/2022
35.657957
-108.491269
66
72
SW6020
SELENIUM
2
1
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0066-0072-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
66
72
SW6020
SILVER
0.057 U
0.11
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B37-0066-0072-01
6/3/2022
35.657957
-108.491269
66
72
SW6020
SILVER
0.058 UJ
0.12
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0066-0072-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
66
72
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.11
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B37-0066-0072-01
6/3/2022
35.657957
-108.491269
66
72
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.15
0.01
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0066-0072-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
66
72
SW6020
URANIUM
4
0.02
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B37-0066-0072-01
6/3/2022
35.657957
-108.491269
66
72
SW6020
URANIUM
7.1
0.021
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0066-0072-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
66
72
SW6020
VANADIUM
13
0.5
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B37-0066-0072-01
6/3/2022
35.657957
-108.491269
66
72
SW6020
VANADIUM
15
0.51
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B33-0066-0072-01
6/3/2022
35.658445
-108.491212
66
72
SW6020
ZINC
36
10
mg/kg
KMP UNC
KM P-S B37-0066-0072-01
6/3/2022
35.657957
-108.491269
66
72
SW6020
ZINC
42
10
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMP-11-00
7/18/2017
35.660042
-108.491651
0
2
Unknown
ARSENIC
7.6
Unknown
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMP-11D-00
7/18/2017
35.660042
-108.491651
0
2
Unknown
ARSENIC
6.4
Unknown
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMP-12-00
7/18/2017
35.660276
-108.49119
0
2
Unknown
ARSENIC
11
Unknown
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMP-11-00
7/18/2017
35.660042
-108.491651
0
2
Unknown
BARIUM
74
Unknown
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMP-11 D-00
7/18/2017
35.660042
-108.491651
0
2
Unknown
BARIUM
59
Unknown
mg/kg
Page 84 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
Arroyo NN
KMP-12-00
7/18/2017
35.660276
-108.49119
0
2
Unknown
BARIUM
59
Unknown
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMP-11-00
7/18/2017
35.660042
-108.491651
0
2
Unknown
CADMIUM
0.063 J
Unknown
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMP-11D-00
7/18/2017
35.660042
-108.491651
0
2
Unknown
CADMIUM
0.12 U
Unknown
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMP-12-00
7/18/2017
35.660276
-108.49119
0
2
Unknown
CADMIUM
0.064 J
Unknown
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMP-11-00
7/18/2017
35.660042
-108.491651
0
2
Unknown
CHROMIUM
5.5
Unknown
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMP-11 D-00
7/18/2017
35.660042
-108.491651
0
2
Unknown
CHROMIUM
5.5
Unknown
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMP-12-00
7/18/2017
35.660276
-108.49119
0
2
Unknown
CHROMIUM
6.7
Unknown
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMP-11-00
7/18/2017
35.660042
-108.491651
0
2
Unknown
LEAD
9.1
Unknown
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMP-11 D-00
7/18/2017
35.660042
-108.491651
0
2
Unknown
LEAD
7.8
Unknown
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMP-12-00
7/18/2017
35.660276
-108.49119
0
2
Unknown
LEAD
9
Unknown
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMP-11-00
7/18/2017
35.660042
-108.491651
0
2
Unknown
MOLYBDENUM
0.62 J
Unknown
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMP-11 D-00
7/18/2017
35.660042
-108.491651
0
2
Unknown
MOLYBDENUM
0.52 J
Unknown
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMP-12-00
7/18/2017
35.660276
-108.49119
0
2
Unknown
MOLYBDENUM
0.81 J
Unknown
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
CRPA-004.1 (0-2)
12/11/2010
35.6609489
-108.492682
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.2 G
0.46
o
Q.
/ g
Arroyo NN
CRPA-005.1 (0-2)
12/11/2010
35.6609379
-108.492681
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.1 G
0.52
pC
'g
Arroyo NN
CRPA-006.1 (0-2)
12/11/2010
35.6608914
-108.492634
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.84 G
0.65
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRPA-007.1 (0-2)
12/11/2010
35.663502
-108.489999
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.2 G
0.43
o
Q.
/ g
Arroyo NN
CRPA-007.1 (0-2) Dup
12/11/2010
35.663502
-108.489999
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.33 G
0.51
o
Q.
/ g
Arroyo NN
CRPA-008.1 (0-2)
12/11/2010
35.6634773
-108.489992
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.08 G
0.57
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRPA-009.1 (0-2)
12/11/2010
35.6634691
-108.489992
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.2 G
0.39
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRPA-010.1 (0-2)
12/11/2010
35.6652361
-108.488896
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.23 G
0.57
o
Q.
/ g
Arroyo NN
CRPA-011.1 (0-2)
12/11/2010
35.6652059
-108.488889
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.23 G
0.45
o
Q.
/ g
Arroyo NN
CRPA-011.4 Dup
12/11/2010
35.6652059
-108.488889
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.36 G
0.48
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRPA-012.1 (0-2)
12/11/2010
35.6652252
-108.488869
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.29 G
0.53
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRPA-013.1 (0-2)
12/11/2010
35.6658514
-108.488413
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.22 G
0.62
o
Q.
/ g
Arroyo NN
CRPA-014.1 (0-2)
12/11/2010
35.6667842
-108.487636
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.79 G
0.57
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRPA-U1.1 (0-2)
12/11/2010
35.6675871
-108.486484
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.69 G
0.46
pC
Zg
Arroyo NN
CRPA-U1.4 Dup
12/11/2010
35.6675871
-108.486484
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.43 G
0.66
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-001.1 (0-2)
12/9/2010
35.6657521
-108.510332
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
0.99 LT
0.35
o
Q.
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-002.1 (0-2)
12/9/2010
35.6657302
-108.510318
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
0.78 LT
0.34
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-003.1 (0-2)
12/9/2010
35.665741
-108.510352
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.23 G
0.46
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-003.1 (0-2) Dup
12/9/2010
35.665741
-108.510352
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.1
0.36
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-004.1 (0-2)
12/9/2010
35.6654039
-108.509221
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.14
0.38
o
Q.
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-004.4 Dup
12/9/2010
35.6654039
-108.509221
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.2
0.41
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-005.1 (0-2)
12/9/2010
35.6654016
-108.509154
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
0.66 LT
0.47
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-005.1 (0-2) Dup
12/9/2010
35.6654016
-108.509154
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
0.73 LT
0.39
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-006.1 (0-2)
12/9/2010
35.6653931
-108.509191
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
0.8 LT
0.37
o
Q.
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-007.1 (0-2)
12/9/2010
35.6639899
-108.50663
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.42 G
0.6
o
Q.
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-008.1 (0-2)
12/9/2010
35.663979
-108.506614
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.32
0.42
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-009.1 (0-2)
12/9/2010
35.6639815
-108.506644
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
0.7 LT
0.47
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-010.1 (0-2)
12/10/2010
35.6643344
-108.505448
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.51
0.31
o
Q.
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-011.1 (0-2)
12/10/2010
35.66437
-108.505462
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.11
0.44
o
Q.
/g
Page 85 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
Arroyo NN
CRUA-012.1 (0-2)
12/10/2010
35.664389
-108.505499
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
0.73 LT
0.34
O
Q.
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-012.1 (0-2) Dup
12/10/2010
35.664389
-108.505499
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
0.62 LT.TI
0.48
O
Q.
/ g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-013.1 (0-2)
12/10/2010
35.6640912
-108.504221
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.38 G
0.39
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-014.1 (0-2)
12/10/2010
35.6641022
-108.504221
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.05 G
0.52
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-015.1 (0-2)
12/10/2010
35.664094
-108.504211
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.19
0.42
o
Q.
/ g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-016.1 (0-2)
12/10/2010
35.663831
-108.503098
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
0.8 LT,G
0.36
O
Q.
/ g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-016.1 (0-2) Dup
12/10/2010
35.663831
-108.503098
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
0.79 LT.TI
0.44
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-017.1 (0-2)
12/10/2010
35.6638339
-108.503071
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.38
0.49
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-017.1 (0-2) Dup
12/10/2010
35.6638339
-108.503071
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.07
0.47
o
Q.
/ g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-018.1 (0-2)
12/10/2010
35.66382
-108.503091
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.27 G
0.48
O
Q.
/ g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-019.1 (0-2)
12/10/2010
35.6636112
-108.502116
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
0.94 LT,G
0.55
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-020.1 (0-2)
12/10/2010
35.663644
-108.502137
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
0.79 LT
0.43
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-020.4 Dup
12/10/2010
35.663644
-108.502137
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.35
0.41
o
Q.
/ g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-021.1 (0-2)
12/10/2010
35.6636112
-108.502113
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
0.93 LT
0.46
O
Q.
/ g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-022.1 (0-2)
12/10/2010
35.6637156
-108.501114
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
0.75 LT,G
0.42
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-022.1 (0-2) Dup
12/10/2010
35.6637156
-108.501114
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
0.76 LT,G
0.49
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-023.1 (0-2)
12/10/2010
35.66371
-108.501141
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
0.67 LT.TI
0.41
o
Q.
/ g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-023.1 (0-2) Dup
12/10/2010
35.66371
-108.501141
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
0.74 LT
0.44
O
Q.
/ g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-024.1 (0-2)
12/10/2010
35.6637129
-108.501114
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
0.92 LT
0.45
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-025.1 (0-2)
12/10/2010
35.6630845
-108.499984
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
0.49 LT,G,TI
0.46
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-026.1 (0-2)
12/10/2010
35.6631118
-108.500015
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
0.75 LT,G
0.54
o
Q.
/ g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-027.1 (0-2)
12/10/2010
35.6631202
-108.499988
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.06
0.43
O
Q.
/ g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-028.1 (0-2)
12/10/2010
35.6628508
-108.499528
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
0.68 LT,G
0.59
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-029.1 (0-2)
12/10/2010
35.66287
-108.499521
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.57
0.36
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-030.1 (0-2)
12/10/2010
35.662884
-108.499488
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
0.93 LT,G
0.3
o
Q.
/ g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-031.1 (0-2)
12/10/2010
35.6621985
-108.499236
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.37
0.44
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-031.4 Dup
12/10/2010
35.6621985
-108.499236
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.55
0.44
pC
Zg
Arroyo NN
CRUA-032.1 (0-2)
12/10/2010
35.6621878
-108.499192
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.67
0.43
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-032.1 (0-2) Dup
12/10/2010
35.6621878
-108.499192
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.3
0.37
o
Q.
/ g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-033.1 (0-2)
12/10/2010
35.6622016
-108.499186
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.54 G
0.53
pC
Zg
Arroyo NN
CRUA-034.1 (0-2)
12/10/2010
35.660668
-108.498294
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
0.98 LT,G
0.43
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-034.1 (0-2) Dup
12/10/2010
35.660668
-108.498294
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
0.74 LT
0.44
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-035.1 (0-2)
12/10/2010
35.6606763
-108.498291
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.14
0.42
o
Q.
/ g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-036.1 (0-2)
12/10/2010
35.6606681
-108.498278
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
0.89 LT
0.36
pC
Zg
Arroyo NN
KMP-11-00
7/18/2017
35.660042
-108.491651
0
2
Unknown
Ra-226
0.84
Unknown
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
KMP-11D-00
7/18/2017
35.660042
-108.491651
0
2
Unknown
Ra-226
0.81 J
Unknown
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
KMP-12-00
7/18/2017
35.660276
-108.49119
0
2
Unknown
Ra-226
0.94
Unknown
o
Q.
/ g
Arroyo NN
KMP-11-00
7/18/2017
35.660042
-108.491651
0
2
Unknown
SELENIUM
1.1 J
Unknown
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMP-11 D-00
7/18/2017
35.660042
-108.491651
0
2
Unknown
SELENIUM
1.1 J
Unknown
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMP-12-00
7/18/2017
35.660276
-108.49119
0
2
Unknown
SELENIUM
1.5
Unknown
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMP-11-00
7/18/2017
35.660042
-108.491651
0
2
Unknown
SILVER
0.46 U
Unknown
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMP-11 D-00
7/18/2017
35.660042
-108.491651
0
2
Unknown
SILVER
0.47 U
Unknown
mg/kg
Page 86 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
Arroyo NN
KMP-12-00
7/18/2017
35.660276
-108.49119
0
2
Unknown
SILVER
0.47 U
Unknown
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMP-11-00
7/18/2017
35.660042
-108.491651
0
2
Unknown
URANIUM
0.64
Unknown
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMP-11D-00
7/18/2017
35.660042
-108.491651
0
2
Unknown
URANIUM
0.57
Unknown
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMP-12-00
7/18/2017
35.660276
-108.49119
0
2
Unknown
URANIUM
0.69
Unknown
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMP-11-00
7/18/2017
35.660042
-108.491651
0
2
Unknown
VANADIUM
16
Unknown
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMP-11 D-00
7/18/2017
35.660042
-108.491651
0
2
Unknown
VANADIUM
16
Unknown
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMP-12-00
7/18/2017
35.660276
-108.49119
0
2
Unknown
VANADIUM
25
Unknown
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMA-SS02-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.660713
-108.490604
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
4700
15
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMA-SS02-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.660713
-108.490604
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.042 J
0.1
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMA-SS02-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.660713
-108.490604
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
4.4
0.2
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMA-SS02-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.660713
-108.490604
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
59
0.51
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMA-SS02-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.660713
-108.490604
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.38
0.051
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMA-SS02-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.660713
-108.490604
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.045 J
0.2
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMA-SS02-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.660713
-108.490604
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
5.1
1
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMA-SS02-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.660713
-108.490604
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
4
0.51
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMA-SS02-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.660713
-108.490604
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
5.1
2
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMA-SS02-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.660713
-108.490604
0
3
SW6020
IRON
12000
20
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMA-SS02-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.660713
-108.490604
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
7.3
0.2
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMA-SS02-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.660713
-108.490604
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
200
0.76
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMA-SS02-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.660713
-108.490604
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.24
0.2
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMA-SS02-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.660713
-108.490604
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
5.5
2
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMA-SS02-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.660713
-108.490604
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
0.86 J
0.33
pCi/g
Arroyo NN
KMA-SS02-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.660713
-108.490604
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1
1
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMA-SS02-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.660713
-108.490604
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.058 U
0.12
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMA-SS02-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.660713
-108.490604
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.092
0.01
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMA-SS02-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.660713
-108.490604
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
0.59
0.02
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMA-SS02-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.660713
-108.490604
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
12
0.51
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMA-SS02-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.660713
-108.490604
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
31
10
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
RWPR-SS-028 (0-6)
10/8/2010
35.6638706
-108.503384
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.26 G
0.54
pCi/g
Arroyo NN
RWPR-SS-029 (0-6)
10/7/2010
35.6639114
-108.503943
0
6
713R11
Ra-226
0.79 LT,G
0.53
pCi/g
Arroyo NN
RWPR-SS-028 (0-6)
10/8/2010
35.6638706
-108.503384
0
6
SW6020
URANIUM
0.78
11
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
RWPR-SS-029 (0-6)
10/7/2010
35.6639114
-108.503943
0
6
SW6020
URANIUM
2.9
10
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
RWPR-SS-028 (1.5-2)
10/8/2010
35.6638706
-108.503384
1.5
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.15
0.43
pCi/g
Arroyo NN
RWPR-SS-028 (1.5-2)
10/8/2010
35.6638706
-108.503384
1.5
2
SW6020
URANIUM
1.2
10
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
CRUA-009.2 (2-4)
12/9/2010
35.6639815
-108.506644
2
4
713R11
Ra-226
1.13 G
0.6
pCi/g
Arroyo NN
CRPA-004.2 (2-6)
12/11/2010
35.6609489
-108.492682
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.37 G
0.67
pCi/g
Arroyo NN
CRPA-005.2 (2-6)
12/11/2010
35.6609379
-108.492681
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.76 G
0.5
pCi/g
Arroyo NN
CRPA-007.2 (2-6)
12/11/2010
35.663502
-108.489999
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.43 G
0.62
pCi/g
Arroyo NN
CRPA-007.2 (2-6) Dup
12/11/2010
35.663502
-108.489999
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.21 G
0.56
pCi/g
Arroyo NN
CRPA-009.2 (2-6)
12/11/2010
35.6634691
-108.489992
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.42 G
0.54
pCi/g
Arroyo NN
CRPA-010.2 (2-6)
12/11/2010
35.6652361
-108.488896
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.6 G
0.66
pCi/g
Arroyo NN
CRPA-011.2 (2-6)
12/11/2010
35.6652059
-108.488889
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
0.92 LT,G
0.74
pCi/g
Page 87 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
Arroyo NN
CRPA-012.2 (2-6)
12/11/2010
35.6652252
-108.488869
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.31 G
0.7
O
Q.
/g
Arroyo NN
CRPA-013.2 (2-6)
12/11/2010
35.6658514
-108.488413
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.12 G
0.59
O
Q.
/ g
Arroyo NN
CRPA-014.2 (2-6)
12/11/2010
35.6667842
-108.487636
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.81 G
0.47
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRPA-U1.2 (2-6)
12/11/2010
35.6675871
-108.486484
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.46 G
0.65
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-001.2 (2-6)
12/9/2010
35.6657521
-108.510332
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.12 G
0.42
o
Q.
/ g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-002.2 (2-6)
12/9/2010
35.6657302
-108.510318
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
0.85 LT,G
0.46
O
Q.
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-003.2 (2-6)
12/9/2010
35.665741
-108.510352
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.55 G
0.62
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-004.2 (2-6)
12/9/2010
35.6654039
-108.509221
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1 G
0.53
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-005.2 (2-6)
12/9/2010
35.6654016
-108.509154
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
0.71 LT,G
0.35
o
Q.
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-006.2 (2-6)
12/9/2010
35.6653931
-108.509191
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
0.41 LT,G
0.33
O
Q.
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-007.2 (2-6)
12/9/2010
35.6639899
-108.50663
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.54 G
0.69
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-008.2 (2-6)
12/9/2010
35.663979
-108.506614
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.67
0.48
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-008.4 Dup
12/9/2010
35.663979
-108.506614
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.96
0.54
o
Q.
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-010.2 (2-6)
12/10/2010
35.6643344
-108.505448
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.82 G
0.48
O
Q.
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-011.2 (2-6)
12/10/2010
35.66437
-108.505462
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.52
0.5
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-012.2 (2-6)
12/10/2010
35.664389
-108.505499
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.23
0.39
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-015.2 (2-6)
12/10/2010
35.664094
-108.504211
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.33
0.41
o
Q.
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-017.2 (2-6)
12/10/2010
35.6638339
-108.503071
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
0.93 LT
0.43
O
Q.
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-018.2 (2-6)
12/10/2010
35.66382
-108.503091
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
2.32 G
0.67
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-020.2 (2-6)
12/10/2010
35.663644
-108.502137
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
3.05
0.52
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-021.2 (2-6)
12/10/2010
35.6636112
-108.502113
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
2.02 G
0.48
o
Q.
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-023.2 (2-6)
12/10/2010
35.66371
-108.501141
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.51
0.46
O
Q.
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-024.2 (2-6)
12/10/2010
35.6637129
-108.501114
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.47
0.42
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-026.2 (2-6)
12/10/2010
35.6631118
-108.500015
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.56 G
0.59
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-026.4 Dup
12/10/2010
35.6631118
-108.500015
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.26 G
0.43
o
Q.
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-027.2 (2-6)
12/10/2010
35.6631202
-108.499988
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.15 G
0.37
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-028.2 (2-6)
12/10/2010
35.6628508
-108.499528
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.01 G
0.52
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-029.2 (2-6)
12/10/2010
35.66287
-108.499521
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.53
0.49
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-030.2 (2-6)
12/10/2010
35.662884
-108.499488
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.63
0.32
o
Q.
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-031.2 (2-6)
12/10/2010
35.6621985
-108.499236
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.47
0.39
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-032.2 (2-6)
12/10/2010
35.6621878
-108.499192
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.52
0.39
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-033.2 (2-6)
12/10/2010
35.6622016
-108.499186
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.61 G
0.53
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-034.2 (2-6)
12/10/2010
35.660668
-108.498294
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.38
0.46
o
Q.
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-034.2 (2-6) Dup
12/10/2010
35.660668
-108.498294
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
0.82 LT
0.44
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-035.2 (2-6)
12/10/2010
35.6606763
-108.498291
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.12 G
0.46
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-036.2 (2-6)
12/10/2010
35.6606681
-108.498278
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
0.66 LT
0.44
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
RWPR-SS-028 (2.5-3)
10/8/2010
35.6638706
-108.503384
2.5
3
713R11
Ra-226
2.2
0.46
o
Q.
/ g
Arroyo NN
RWPR-SS-028 (2.5-3)
10/8/2010
35.6638706
-108.503384
2.5
3
SW6020
URANIUM
1.5
10
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
RWPR-SS-029 (6-9)
10/7/2010
35.6639114
-108.503943
6
9
713R11
Ra-226
1.07
0.53
pCi/g
Arroyo NN
RWPR-SS-029 (6-9)
10/7/2010
35.6639114
-108.503943
6
9
SW6020
URANIUM
2.5
11
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
CRUA-003.3 (6-11)
12/9/2010
35.665741
-108.510352
6
11
713R11
Ra-226
1.93 G
0.6
pCi/g
Arroyo NN
CRPA-007.3 (6-12)
12/11/2010
35.663502
-108.489999
6
12
713R11
Ra-226
1.46 G
0.46
pCi/g
Page 88 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
Arroyo NN
CRUA-007.3 (6-12)
12/9/2010
35.6639899
-108.50663
6
12
713R11
Ra-226
1.71 G
0.58
pCi/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-030.3 (6-12)
12/10/2010
35.662884
-108.499488
6
12
713R11
Ra-226
1.39
0.33
pCi/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-030.3 (6-12) Dup
12/10/2010
35.662884
-108.499488
6
12
713R11
Ra-226
1.47
0.46
pCi/g
Arroyo NN
CRPA-004.3 (7-13)
12/11/2010
35.6609489
-108.492682
7
13
713R11
Ra-226
1.45 G
0.47
pCi/g
Arroyo NN
CRPA-010.3 (9-15)
12/11/2010
35.6652361
-108.488896
9
15
713R11
Ra-226
1.95 G
0.52
pCi/g
Arroyo NN
KMA-SS02-0012-0018-01
5/19/2022
35.660713
-108.490604
12
18
SW6020
ALUMINUM
4200
16
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMA-SS02-0012-0018-01
5/19/2022
35.660713
-108.490604
12
18
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.064 J
0.1
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMA-SS02-0012-0018-01
5/19/2022
35.660713
-108.490604
12
18
SW6020
ARSENIC
5.6
0.21
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMA-SS02-0012-0018-01
5/19/2022
35.660713
-108.490604
12
18
SW6020
BARIUM
75
0.52
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMA-SS02-0012-0018-01
5/19/2022
35.660713
-108.490604
12
18
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.39
0.052
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMA-SS02-0012-0018-01
5/19/2022
35.660713
-108.490604
12
18
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.073 J
0.21
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMA-SS02-0012-0018-01
5/19/2022
35.660713
-108.490604
12
18
SW6020
CHROMIUM
4.5
1
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMA-SS02-0012-0018-01
5/19/2022
35.660713
-108.490604
12
18
SW6020
COBALT
4.5
0.52
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMA-SS02-0012-0018-01
5/19/2022
35.660713
-108.490604
12
18
SW6020
COPPER
5.1
2.1
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMA-SS02-0012-0018-01
5/19/2022
35.660713
-108.490604
12
18
SW6020
IRON
15000
21
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMA-SS02-0012-0018-01
5/19/2022
35.660713
-108.490604
12
18
SW6020
LEAD
8
0.21
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMA-SS02-0012-0018-01
5/19/2022
35.660713
-108.490604
12
18
SW6020
MANGANESE
400
0.79
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMA-SS02-0012-0018-01
5/19/2022
35.660713
-108.490604
12
18
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.45
0.21
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMA-SS02-0012-0018-01
5/19/2022
35.660713
-108.490604
12
18
SW6020
NICKEL
5.5
2.1
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMA-SS02-0012-0018-01
5/19/2022
35.660713
-108.490604
12
18
713R15
Ra-226
0.75 J
0.35
pCi/g
Arroyo NN
KMA-SS02-0012-0018-01
5/19/2022
35.660713
-108.490604
12
18
SW6020
SELENIUM
0.9 J
1
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMA-SS02-0012-0018-01
5/19/2022
35.660713
-108.490604
12
18
SW6020
SILVER
0.06 U
0.12
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMA-SS02-0012-0018-01
5/19/2022
35.660713
-108.490604
12
18
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.082
0.01
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMA-SS02-0012-0018-01
5/19/2022
35.660713
-108.490604
12
18
SW6020
URANIUM
0.56
0.021
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMA-SS02-0012-0018-01
5/19/2022
35.660713
-108.490604
12
18
SW6020
VANADIUM
13
0.52
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
KMA-SS02-0012-0018-01
5/19/2022
35.660713
-108.490604
12
18
SW6020
ZINC
32
10
mg/kg
Arroyo NN
CRUA-002.3 (13-19)
12/9/2010
35.6657302
-108.510318
13
19
713R11
Ra-226
0.95 LT
0.55
pC
'9
Arroyo NN
CRPA-U1.3 (14-20)
12/11/2010
35.6675871
-108.486484
14
20
713R11
Ra-226
2.19 G
0.61
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-001.3 (14-20)
12/9/2010
35.6657521
-108.510332
14
20
713R11
Ra-226
1.12 G
0.44
o
Q.
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-004.3 (14-20)
12/9/2010
35.6654039
-108.509221
14
20
713R11
Ra-226
1.63 G
0.39
pC
'g
Arroyo NN
CRPA-011.3 (15-21)
12/11/2010
35.6652059
-108.488889
15
21
713R11
Ra-226
1.28 G
0.64
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-009.3 (16-22)
12/9/2010
35.6639815
-108.506644
16
22
713R11
Ra-226
1.28 G
0.39
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-008.3 (18-24)
12/9/2010
35.663979
-108.506614
18
24
713R11
Ra-226
1.75 G
0.56
o
Q.
/g
Arroyo NN
CRPA-005.3 (30-36)
12/11/2010
35.6609379
-108.492681
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
2.66 G
0.58
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRPA-012.3 (30-36)
12/11/2010
35.6652252
-108.488869
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.21 G
0.57
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRPA-013.3 (30-36)
12/11/2010
35.6658514
-108.488413
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.27 G
0.57
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRPA-013.3 (30-36) Dup
12/11/2010
35.6658514
-108.488413
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.06 G
0.65
o
Q.
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-005.3 (30-36)
12/9/2010
35.6654016
-108.509154
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.17
0.5
o
Q.
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-006.3 (30-36)
12/9/2010
35.6653931
-108.509191
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.25 G
0.56
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-010.3 (30-36)
12/10/2010
35.6643344
-108.505448
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.51 G
0.48
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-010.3 (30-36) Dup
12/10/2010
35.6643344
-108.505448
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.27
0.48
o
Q.
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-011.3 (30-36)
12/10/2010
35.66437
-108.505462
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.89 G
0.45
o
Q.
/g
Page 89 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
Arroyo NN
CRUA-012.3 (30-36)
12/10/2010
35.664389
-108.505499
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.89 G
0.44
O
Q.
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-015.3 (30-36)
12/10/2010
35.664094
-108.504211
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
2.66 G
0.5
O
Q.
/ g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-015.4 Dup
12/10/2010
35.664094
-108.504211
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
2.59 G
0.52
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-017.3 (30-36)
12/10/2010
35.6638339
-108.503071
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
2.22
0.46
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-018.3 (30-36)
12/10/2010
35.66382
-108.503091
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
2.93 G
0.49
o
Q.
/ g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-020.3 (30-36)
12/10/2010
35.663644
-108.502137
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
3.28 G
0.65
O
Q.
/ g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-021.3 (30-36)
12/10/2010
35.6636112
-108.502113
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.94 G
0.52
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-023.3 (30-36)
12/10/2010
35.66371
-108.501141
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
2.45
0.43
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-024.3 (30-36)
12/10/2010
35.6637129
-108.501114
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.95 G
0.43
o
Q.
/ g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-026.3 (30-36)
12/10/2010
35.6631118
-108.500015
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
2.82 G
0.54
O
Q.
/ g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-027.3 (30-36)
12/10/2010
35.6631202
-108.499988
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.41 G
0.4
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-028.3 (30-36)
12/10/2010
35.6628508
-108.499528
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.42 G
0.43
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-029.3 (30-36)
12/10/2010
35.66287
-108.499521
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.54
0.45
o
Q.
/ g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-031.3 (30-36)
12/10/2010
35.6621985
-108.499236
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
2
0.57
O
Q.
/ g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-032.3 (30-36)
12/10/2010
35.6621878
-108.499192
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
2.06
0.46
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-033.3 (30-36)
12/10/2010
35.6622016
-108.499186
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
3.05 G
0.64
pC
/g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-034.3 (30-36)
12/10/2010
35.660668
-108.498294
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.62
0.45
o
Q.
/ g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-035.3 (30-36)
12/10/2010
35.6606763
-108.498291
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.64
0.44
O
Q.
/ g
Arroyo NN
CRUA-036.3 (30-36)
12/10/2010
35.6606681
-108.498278
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
2.09 G
0.54
pC
/g
Arroyo UNC
CRPA-001.1 (0-2)
12/11/2010
35.6565449
-108.496193
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
0.79 LT
0.44
pC
/g
Arroyo UNC
CRPA-001.1 (0-2) Dup
12/11/2010
35.6565449
-108.496193
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
0.59 LT
0.46
o
Q.
/ g
Arroyo UNC
CRPA-002.1 (0-2)
12/11/2010
35.6565366
-108.4962
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
1.07 G
0.37
O
Q.
/ g
Arroyo UNC
CRPA-002.1 (0-2) Dup
12/11/2010
35.6565366
-108.4962
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
0.72 LT.TI
0.43
pC
/g
Arroyo UNC
CRPA-003.1 (0-2)
12/11/2010
35.6565341
-108.496166
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
0.84 LT.TI
0.56
pC
/g
Arroyo UNC
CRUA-037.1 (0-2)
12/10/2010
35.6566466
-108.496686
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
0.79 LT
0.48
o
Q.
/ g
Arroyo UNC
CRUA-038.1 (0-2)
12/10/2010
35.6566744
-108.496632
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
0.74 LT
0.31
pC
/g
Arroyo UNC
CRUA-039.1 (0-2)
12/10/2010
35.6566965
-108.496605
0
2
713R11
Ra-226
0.58 LT,G,TI
0.5
pc
/g
Arroyo UNC
KMA-SS01-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659642
-108.493534
0
3
SW6020
ALUMINUM
4400
15
mg/kg
Arroyo UNC
KMA-SS01-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659642
-108.493534
0
3
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.055 J
0.099
mg/kg
Arroyo UNC
KMA-SS01-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659642
-108.493534
0
3
SW6020
ARSENIC
4.6
0.2
mg/kg
Arroyo UNC
KMA-SS01-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659642
-108.493534
0
3
SW6020
BARIUM
48
0.5
mg/kg
Arroyo UNC
KMA-SS01-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659642
-108.493534
0
3
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.37
0.05
mg/kg
Arroyo UNC
KMA-SS01-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659642
-108.493534
0
3
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.054 J
0.2
mg/kg
Arroyo UNC
KMA-SS01-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659642
-108.493534
0
3
SW6020
CHROMIUM
4.9
0.99
mg/kg
Arroyo UNC
KMA-SS01-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659642
-108.493534
0
3
SW6020
COBALT
4.4
0.5
mg/kg
Arroyo UNC
KMA-SS01-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659642
-108.493534
0
3
SW6020
COPPER
4.7
2
mg/kg
Arroyo UNC
KMA-SS01-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659642
-108.493534
0
3
SW6020
IRON
13000
20
mg/kg
Arroyo UNC
KMA-SS01-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659642
-108.493534
0
3
SW6020
LEAD
7.5
0.2
mg/kg
Arroyo UNC
KMA-SS01-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659642
-108.493534
0
3
SW6020
MANGANESE
240
0.74
mg/kg
Arroyo UNC
KMA-SS01-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659642
-108.493534
0
3
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.28
0.2
mg/kg
Arroyo UNC
KMA-SS01-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659642
-108.493534
0
3
SW6020
NICKEL
5.5
2
mg/kg
Arroyo UNC
KMA-SS01-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659642
-108.493534
0
3
713R15
Ra-226
0.85 J
0.4
pCi/g
Page 90 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Exposure
Unit
Sample ID
Sample
Date
Latitude
Longitude
Sample
Top
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Sample
Bottom
Depth
(inches
bgs)
Analytical
Method
Analyte
Result and
Qualifier
Reporting
Limit
Unit
Arroyo UNC
KMA-SS01-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659642
-108.493534
0
3
SW6020
SELENIUM
1.3
0.99
mg/kg
Arroyo UNC
KMA-SS01-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659642
-108.493534
0
3
SW6020
SILVER
0.057 U
0.11
mg/kg
Arroyo UNC
KMA-SS01-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659642
-108.493534
0
3
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.091
0.0099
mg/kg
Arroyo UNC
KMA-SS01-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659642
-108.493534
0
3
SW6020
URANIUM
0.53
0.02
mg/kg
Arroyo UNC
KMA-SS01-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659642
-108.493534
0
3
SW6020
VANADIUM
12
0.5
mg/kg
Arroyo UNC
KMA-SS01-0000-0003-01
5/19/2022
35.659642
-108.493534
0
3
SW6020
ZINC
30
9.9
mg/kg
Arroyo UNC
CRPA-001.2 (2-6)
12/11/2010
35.6565449
-108.496193
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.36 G
0.55
pCi/g
Arroyo UNC
CRPA-002.2 (2-6)
12/11/2010
35.6565366
-108.4962
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.02 G
0.6
pCi/g
Arroyo UNC
CRPA-003.2 (2-6)
12/11/2010
35.6565341
-108.496166
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.55 G
0.52
pCi/g
Arroyo UNC
CRUA-037.2 (2-6)
12/10/2010
35.6566466
-108.496686
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
1.09 G
0.54
pCi/g
Arroyo UNC
CRUA-037.4 Dup
12/10/2010
35.6566466
-108.496686
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
0.77 LT,G
0.46
pCi/g
Arroyo UNC
CRUA-038.2 (2-6)
12/10/2010
35.6566744
-108.496632
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
0.68 LT
0.49
pCi/g
Arroyo UNC
CRUA-039.2 (2-6)
12/10/2010
35.6566965
-108.496605
2
6
713R11
Ra-226
0.86 LT,G,TI
0.5
pCi/g
Arroyo UNC
KMA-SS01 -0012-0018-01
5/19/2022
35.659642
-108.493534
12
18
SW6020
ALUMINUM
4700
16
mg/kg
Arroyo UNC
KMA-SS01 -0012-0018-01
5/19/2022
35.659642
-108.493534
12
18
SW6020
ANTIMONY
0.067 J
0.1
mg/kg
Arroyo UNC
KMA-SS01 -0012-0018-01
5/19/2022
35.659642
-108.493534
12
18
SW6020
ARSENIC
4.8
0.21
mg/kg
Arroyo UNC
KMA-SS01 -0012-0018-01
5/19/2022
35.659642
-108.493534
12
18
SW6020
BARIUM
62
0.52
mg/kg
Arroyo UNC
KMA-SS01 -0012-0018-01
5/19/2022
35.659642
-108.493534
12
18
SW6020
BERYLLIUM
0.4
0.052
mg/kg
Arroyo UNC
KMA-SS01 -0012-0018-01
5/19/2022
35.659642
-108.493534
12
18
SW6020
CADMIUM
0.055 J
0.21
mg/kg
Arroyo UNC
KMA-SS01 -0012-0018-01
5/19/2022
35.659642
-108.493534
12
18
SW6020
CHROMIUM
5
1
mg/kg
Arroyo UNC
KMA-SS01 -0012-0018-01
5/19/2022
35.659642
-108.493534
12
18
SW6020
COBALT
3.9
0.52
mg/kg
Arroyo UNC
KMA-SS01 -0012-0018-01
5/19/2022
35.659642
-108.493534
12
18
SW6020
COPPER
5.4
2.1
mg/kg
Arroyo UNC
KMA-SS01 -0012-0018-01
5/19/2022
35.659642
-108.493534
12
18
SW6020
IRON
15000
21
mg/kg
Arroyo UNC
KMA-SS01 -0012-0018-01
5/19/2022
35.659642
-108.493534
12
18
SW6020
LEAD
7.5
0.21
mg/kg
Arroyo UNC
KMA-SS01 -0012-0018-01
5/19/2022
35.659642
-108.493534
12
18
SW6020
MANGANESE
280
0.78
mg/kg
Arroyo UNC
KMA-SS01 -0012-0018-01
5/19/2022
35.659642
-108.493534
12
18
SW6020
MOLYBDENUM
0.28
0.21
mg/kg
Arroyo UNC
KMA-SS01 -0012-0018-01
5/19/2022
35.659642
-108.493534
12
18
SW6020
NICKEL
5.8
2.1
mg/kg
Arroyo UNC
KMA-SS01 -0012-0018-01
5/19/2022
35.659642
-108.493534
12
18
713R15
Ra-226
0.82 J
0.61
pCi/g
Arroyo UNC
KMA-SS01 -0012-0018-01
5/19/2022
35.659642
-108.493534
12
18
SW6020
SELENIUM
0.91 J
1
mg/kg
Arroyo UNC
KMA-SS01 -0012-0018-01
5/19/2022
35.659642
-108.493534
12
18
SW6020
SILVER
0.059 U
0.12
mg/kg
Arroyo UNC
KMA-SS01 -0012-0018-01
5/19/2022
35.659642
-108.493534
12
18
SW6020
THALLIUM
0.086
0.01
mg/kg
Arroyo UNC
KMA-SS01 -0012-0018-01
5/19/2022
35.659642
-108.493534
12
18
SW6020
URANIUM
0.62
0.021
mg/kg
Arroyo UNC
KMA-SS01 -0012-0018-01
5/19/2022
35.659642
-108.493534
12
18
SW6020
VANADIUM
13
0.52
mg/kg
Arroyo UNC
KMA-SS01 -0012-0018-01
5/19/2022
35.659642
-108.493534
12
18
SW6020
ZINC
33
10
mg/kg
Arroyo UNC
CRPA-001.3 (30-36)
12/11/2010
35.6565449
-108.496193
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.17 G
0.61
pC
'9
Arroyo UNC
CRPA-001.4 Dup
12/11/2010
35.6565449
-108.496193
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
0.96 LT,G
0.53
pC
/g
Arroyo UNC
CRPA-002.3 (30-36)
12/11/2010
35.6565366
-108.4962
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.01 G
0.55
o
Q.
/g
Arroyo UNC
CRPA-003.3 (30-36)
12/11/2010
35.6565341
-108.496166
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.2 G
0.45
O
Q.
/ g
Arroyo UNC
CRUA-037.3 (30-36)
12/10/2010
35.6566466
-108.496686
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
1.83 G
0.36
pC
/g
Arroyo UNC
CRUA-038.3 (30-36)
12/10/2010
35.6566744
-108.496632
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
0.69 LT,G
0.5
pC
/g
Arroyo UNC
CRUA-039.3 (30-36)
12/10/2010
35.6566965
-108.496605
30
36
713R11
Ra-226
0.57 LT,G
0.51
o
Q.
/g
Page 91 of 92
-------
Attachment C-1. Data Used in the Risk Assessment
Notes:
bgs Below ground surface
CR1 Quivira Church Rock Mine No. 1
CR1E Quivira Church Rock Mine No. 1 East
G Sample density differs by more than 15 percent of the laboratory control sample density
J Estimated concentration
Kerr-McGee Kerr-McGee Corporation
KMP Kerr-McGee Ponds
LT Less than
M3 The requested minimum detectable concentration was not met, but the reported activity is greater than the reported minimum detectable concentration
mg/kg Milligram per kilogram
NN Navajo Nation
pCi/g Picocurie per gram
Ra-226 Radium-226
Tl Nuclide identification is tentative
U Not detected
UJ Not detected; the detection limit is estimated
UNC United Nuclear Corporation
Page 92 of 92
-------
APPENDIX D
ENVIRONMENTAL METRICS ANALYSIS
-------
Table D-1. Environmental Metrics Assessment Summary
Alternative
Energy Use1
Air
Pollutants2
Water Use3
Water
Quality
Impacts4
Ecosystem
Impact5
Materials6
Overall
Greenness
Score7
Alternative 1: No Action
8
8
8
8
8
8
48
Alternative 2: Consolidate and Cap All Waste On Site.
5
5
4
4
5
5
28
Alternative 3: Dispose of All Mine Waste Off Site at
Red Rock Disposal Facility.
3
3
2
3
4
6
21
Alternative 4: Dispose of All Mine Waste Off Site at
RCRA C or LLRW Facility.
1
1
1
1
1
6
11
Notes:
A rating system of 1 through 8 is used where 8 is best and 1 is worst.
Total energy use and percentage of renewable energy
2 Air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions
3 Water use
4 Impacts on water resources
5 Protecting ecosystem services
6 Materials management and waste reduction
7 Overall greenneess score was calculated by summing the score in each of the six core elements.
LLRW Low-level radioactive waste
RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Page 1 of 1
-------
Table D-2. Estimated Risk of Injuries and Fatalities and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Onsite and Offsite Trucking
Alternative
Truckloads of
Waste
Miles Round Trip
to Transport
Waste
Truckloads of
Offsite Fill
Miles Round Trip to
Import Fill and
Cover
Water Truck
Mileage
Total Miles
Estimated Injuries
from Offsite
Trucking1
Estimated Fatalities
from Offsite
Trucking1
Estimated Greenhouse
Gas Emissions from
Offsite Trucking2
(metric tons C02e)
1: No Action
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2: Consolidate and Cap All Mine Waste On
Site
57,140
6
22,370
5
236,600
691,290
0.224
0.0104
1,200
3: Dispose of All Mine Waste Off Site at Red
Rocks Disposal Facility
76,180
88
18,330
5
266,900
7,062,390
2.29
0.1066
12,500
4: Dispose of All Mine Waste Off Site at a
RCRA C or LLRW Facility
76,180
1,250
18,330
5
987,900
96,304,550
31.20
1.4542
170,900
Notes:
1 A rate of 32.4 injuries and 1.51 fatalities per 100 million large truck miles traveled was calculated as shown below using data from 2011 to 2020 from the National Center for Statistics and Analysis (2022).
Injury Rate per
Fatality Rate per
People Killed in
Number of Large
100 Million Large-
100 Million Large-
Crashes Involving
Trucks Involved in
Large-Truck Miles
Truck-Miles
Truck-Miles
Year
Large Trucks
Injuries
Traveled (millions)
Traveled
Traveled
2011
3,633
62,534
267,594
23.37
1.36
2012
3,825
76,621
269,207
28.46
1.42
2013
3,921
73,089
275,017
26.58
1.43
2014
3,749
88,473
279,132
31.70
1.34
2015
4,075
87,307
279,844
31.20
1.46
2016
4,562
102,080
287,895
35.46
1.58
2017
4,805
106,733
297,593
35.87
1.61
2018
4,909
112,253
304,864
36.82
1.61
2019
5,033
118,527
300,050
39.50
1.68
2020
4,842
106,902
302,141
35.38
1.60
32.43 injuries per 100 million miles traveled
Average from 201
1 - 2020
1.51 fatalities per 100 million miles traveled
2 Metric tons of C02e per large truck mile traveled was calculated as shown below using data and methods from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2022) Greenhouse Gases Equivalencies Calculator. Carbon dioxide emissions per gallon of
diesel fuel was obtained from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (2022). Mileage for combination trucks (Classification Types 8-13) was obtained from Federal Highway Administration (2018) highway statistics based on 2012 and 2013 data.
22.38 lb C02/gallon diesel fuel X
1 C02e
X
1
0.001775
metric tons C02e
2,205 lb C02/metric ton C02
0.986 C02
5.8 miles/gallon
miles traveled
C02e Carbon dioxide equivalent
LLRW Low-level radioactive waste
RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
References:
Federal Flighway Administration. 2018. "Annual Vehicle Distance Traveled in Miles and Related Data - 2013 by Flighway Category and Vehicle Type: Table M-1Revised May. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/statistics/2013/vm1 .cfm.
National Center for Statistics and Analysis. 2022. "Large Trucks: 2020 Data." Traffic Safety Facts. Report No. DOT FIS 813 286. National Flighway Traffic Safety Administration. April. https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/813286.
U.S. Energy Information Administration. 2022. "Frequently Asked Questions: Flow Much Carbon Dioxide Is Produced from U.S. Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Consumption?" Last updated May 10. https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=307&t=11.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2022. "Greenhouse Gases Equivalencies Calculator - Calculations and References." Last updated June 23. https://www.epa.gov/energy/greenhouse-gases-equivalencies-calculator-calculations-and-references.
Page 1 of 1
-------
APPENDIX E
COST ANALYSIS
-------
Table E-1. Alternative 2
Cost Estimate Summary
Site: Quivira Tronox Mines Site
Location: Navajo Nation, New Mexico
Phase: Feasibility Study (-30% to +50%)
Alternative 2. Consolidate and Cap All Mine Waste On Site
Base Year: 2023
Date: August 2023
Direct Capital Costs
Description
Quantity
Unit
Unit Cost
Total Cost
Field Overhead and Oversight Costs:
Field Overhead and Oversight
35
Months
36,715.18
$1,285,000
Mobilization/Demobilization
8
Each
54,148.02
$433,200
Travel, Lodgingand Per Diem
525
Ea Person per MO
5,505
$2,890,100
Voluntary Alternative Housing
1
Lump Sum
2,000,000
$2,000,000
SUBTOTAL
$6,608,000
General Site Work Costs:
Fence Construction/Repair - Equipment Storage Area
1,000
LF
$28.24
$28,200
Clearing and Grubbing
63
AC
$1,331.54
$83,700
Land Surveying
63
AC
$697.34
$43,800
SUBTOTAL
$156,000
Earthwork Costs:
Excavation of Mine Waste (Excavate and Load into Trucks)
1,005,500
BCY
$2.16
$2,173,900
Excavation of Mine Waste - Dozer Scraping (25% of Volume, In Addition to Excavator)
251,375
BCY
$2.68
$673,700
General Backfill from Off-Site (Import, Place, Compact)
109,951
LCY
$30.69
$3,374,800
General Backfill from On-Site (Import, Place, Compact)
256,551
LCY
$12.11
$3,107,400
Soil Cap
64,533
CCY
$34.10
$2,200,800
Site Restoration
63
AC
$23,807.26
$1,496,500
Erosion and Sediment Control
251
AC-YR
$735.10
$184,800
Dust Control
696
Day
$7,907.84
$5,502,000
Pipeline Arroyo Sloping, Armoring, and Road Rebuilding
1
Lump Sum
$293,147.53
$293,148
Shaft Closure
2
Each
$109,522.20
$219,044
Adit Closure
2
Each
$50,000
$100,000
SUBTOTAL
$19,326,000
Transportation and Disposal Costs:
Hauling to CR-2, Placing, Compaction, and Covering
1,256,875
LCY
$11.52
$14,479,200
Dust Control
667
Day
$7,907.84
$5,277,500
SUBTOTAL
$19,756,700
Total Direct Capital Costs (Rounded to Nearest $1,000)
$45,847,000
Indirect Capital Costs
Description
%
Total Cost
Permitting/Planning/lnstitutional Controls
4%
$1,254,712
Professional/Tech. - Project Management
5%
$1,568,390
Professional/Tech. - Remedial Design
5%
$1,568,390
Professional/Tech. - Construction Mgmt.
6%
$1,882,068
Total Indirect Capital Costs (Rounded to Nearest $1,000)
$6,274,000
Total Capital Costs
Description
%
Total Cost
Subtotal Capital Costs
$52,121,000
Contingency Allowance
15%
$7,758,150
Total Capital Cost (Rounded to Nearest $1,000)
$59,879,000
Maintenance Costs
Description
%
Total Cost
Present Worth of 10, 30, and 100 Years Maintenance Costs Depending on
to the Nearest $1,000)
Activity (Rounded
7.0%
$1,377,000
Contingency Allowance (25%)
25%
$344,300
Total Present Worth Maintenance Costs (Rounded to Nearest $1,000)
$1,721,000
Total Cost (Rounded to Nearest $1,000)
$61,600,000
Notes:
xl.25 Expansion Factor Used for all LCY quantities
x0.9 Compaction Factor Used for all CCY quantities
AC
Acre
BCY
Bank Cubic Yard
CCY
Compacted Cubic Yard
CF
Cubic Foot
EA
Each
LCY
Loose Cubic Yard
LF
Linear Foot
MO
Month
YR
Year
Page 1 of 1
-------
Table E-2. Alternative 2 Cost Estimating Assumptions
Alternative 2 Assumptions
Mobilization/Demobilization
Total Time (Days)
3
Clearing and Grubbing
Total Acres
63
Daily Output
4
Total Clearing Time (Days)
16
Hauling
Total Material (CY)
1,321,408
Daily Output (CY/trip)
22
Trip/Day/Truck
15
# of Trucks
6
Total Time (Days)
667
Site Restoration
Total Area (Acres)
63
Volume per Acre of Imported Borrow (CY/Acre)
807
Daily Output for Importing Borrow (CY/Day/Dozer)
1,000
# of Dozers
4
Total Site Restoration Time (Days)
13
Inspection and Maintenance
Total Cap and Restoration Area Requiring Regrading (SY)
48,400
Total Cap and Restoration Area Requiring Hydroseeding Revegetation (SY)
304,242
Duration of Inspection & Maintenance of Cap (years)
100
Duration of Inspection & Maintenance of Restored Excavation Areas (years)
30
Present Worth Interest Rate (%)
7.0%
Area of repository cap requiring regrading each year (0-10) (%)
10%
Area of repository cap requiring regrading each year (10-30) (%)
5%
Area of repository cap requiring revegetation each year (0-10)(%)
25%
Area of repository cap requiring revegetation each year (10-30)(%)
10%
Areas not capped of requiring regrading each year (0-10) (%)
10%
Areas not capped of requiring regrading each year (10-30) (%)
5%
Areas not capped requiring revegetation each year (0-10) (%)
25%
Areas not capped requiring revegetation each year (10-30) (%)
10%
Equipment mobilization cost for annual maintenance ($)
666
Total Job Duration (Excluding Maintenance)
Working Days (Assume 240 days/year)
699
Working Months
35
Actual 9 Months (Assume 180 working days/year) to Account for Weather
47
Working Years
2.9
Actual Years (Assume 180 working days/year)
3.9
Total Job Duration
4 Years
Notes:
CY Cubic Yard
MO Month
SY Square Yard
Page 1 of 1
-------
Table E-3. Alternative 3
Cost Estimate Summary
Site: Quivira Tronox Mines Site
Location: Navajo Nation, New Mexico
Phase: Feasibility Study (-30% to +50%)
Base Year: 2023
Alternative 3. Dispose of All Mine Waste Off Site at Red Rock
Disposal Facility
Date: August 2023
Direct Capital Costs
Description
Quantity
Unit
Unit Cost
Total Cost
Field Overhead and Oversight Costs:
Field Overhead and Oversight
42
MO
36,715
$1,542,000
Mobilization/Demobilization
10
EA
54,148
$541,500
Travel, Lodgingand Per Diem
630
Ea Person per MO
5,505
$3,468,200
Voluntary Alternative Housing
1
Lump Sum
2,000,000
$2,000,000
SUBTOTAL
$7,552,000
General Site Work Costs:
Fence Construction/Repair - Equipment Storage Area
1,000
LF
$28.24
$28,200
Clearingand Grubbing
63
AC
$1,332
$83,700
Land Surveying
63
AC
$697
$43,800
SUBTOTAL
$156,000
Earthwork Costs:
Excavation of Mine Waste (Excavate and Load into Trucks)
1,005,500
BCY
$2.16
$2,173,900
Excavation of Mine Waste - Dozer Scraping (25% of Volume, In Addition to Excavator) 251,375
BCY
$2.68
$673,700
General Backfill from Off-Site (Import, Place, Compact)
109,951
LCY
$30.69
$3,374,800
General Backfill from On-Site (Import, Place, Compact)
256,551
LCY
$12.11
$3,107,400
Site Restoration
63
AC
$23,807
$1,496,500
Erosion and Sediment Control
314
AC-YR
$735
$231,000
Dust Control
822
Day
$3,954
$3,249,600
Shaft Closure
2
Each
$109,522
$219,000
Adit Closure
2
Each
$50,000
$100,000
SUBTOTAL
$14,626,000
Transportation and Disposal Costs:
Hauling to Red Rocks Disposal Facility
1,256,875
LCY
$12.90
$16,213,700
Disposal of Contaminated Soil - Red Rocks Disposal Facility
1,256,875
LCY
$82.50
$103,692,200
Dust Control
793
Day
$7,908
$6,274,700
SUBTOTAL
$126,180,600
Total Direct Capital Costs (Rounded to Nearest $1,000)
$148,515,000
Indirect Capital Costs
Description
%
Total Cost
Permitting/Planning/lnstitutional Controls
4%
$1,792,912
Professional/Technician - Project Management
5%
$2,241,140
Professional/Technician - Remedial Design
5%
$2,241,140
Professional/Technician - Construction Management.
6%
$2,689,368
Total Indirect Capital Costs (Rounded to Nearest $1,000)
$8,965,000
Total Capital Costs
Description
%
Total Cost
Subtotal Capital Costs
$157,480,000
Contingency Allowance
15%
$23,622,000
Total Capital Cost (Rounded to Nearest $1,000)
$181,102,000
Maintenance Costs
Description
Total Cost
Present Worth of 10 and 30 Years Maintenance Costs Depending
the Nearest $1,000)
on Activity (Rounded to
$1,148,000
Contingency Allowance
25%
$287,000
Total Present Worth Maintenance Costs (Rounded to Nearest $1,000)
$1,435,000
Total Cost (Rounded to Nearest $1,000)
$182,537,000
xl.25 Expansion Factor Used for all LCY quantities
x0.9 Compaction Factor Used for all CCY quantities
AC
Acre
BCY
Bank Cubic Yard
CCY
Compacted Cubic Yard
CF
Cubic Foot
EA
Each
LCY
Loose Cubic Yard
LF
Linear Foot
MO
Month
YR
Year
Page 1 of 1
-------
Table E-4. Alternative 3 Cost Estimating Assumptions
Alternative 3 Assumptions
Mobilization/Demobilization
Total Time (Days)
3.00
Clearing and Grubbing
Total Acres
63
Daily Output
4
Total Clearing Time (Days)
15.7
Hauling
Total Material (CY)
1,256,875
Daily Output (CY/trip)
17
Trip/Day/Truck
4
# of Trucks
24
Total Time (Days)
793
Site Restoration
Total Area (Acres)
63
Volume per Acre of Imported Borrow (CY/Acre)
807
Daily Output for Importing Borrow (CY/Day/Dozer)
1,000
# of Dozers
4
Total Site Restoration Time (Days)
12.7
Inspection and Maintenance
Total Restored Excavation Area Requiring Regrading (SY)
304,242
Total Restored Excavation Area Requiring Hydroseeding Revegetation (SY)
304,242
Duration of Inspection & Maintenance of Restored Excavation Areas (years)
30
Present Worth Interest Rate (%)
7.0%
Areas requiring regrading each year (0-10) (%)
10%
Areas requiring regrading each year (10-30) (%)
5%
Areas requiring revegetation each year (0-10) (%)
25%
Areas requiring revegetation each year (10-30) (%)
10%
Equipment mobilization cost for annual maintenance ($)
666
Total Job Duration (Excluding Maintenance)
Working Days (Assume 240 days/year)
825
Working Months
42
Actual 9 Months (Assume 180 working days/year) to Account for Weather
56
Working Years
3.4
Actual Years (Assume 180 working days/year)
4.6
Total Job Duration
4 Years 7 Months
Notes:
CY Cubic Yard
MO Month
SY Square Yard
Page 1 of 1
-------
Table E-5. Alternative 4
Cost Estimate Summary
Site: Quivira Tronox Mines Site
Location: Navajo Nation, New Mexico
Alternative 4. Dispose of All Mine Waste Off Site at a Resource
Phase: Feasibility Study (-30% to +50%)
Conservation and Recovery Act C or Low-Level Radioactive Waste
Base Year: 2023
Facility
Date: August 2023
Direct Capital Costs
Description
Quantity
Unit
Unit Cost
Total Cost
Field Overhead and Oversight Costs:
Field Overhead and Oversight
154
MO
36,715
$5,654,100
Mobilization/Demobilization
36
EA
54,148
$1,949,300
Travel, Lodgingand Per Diem
2,310
Ea Person per MO
5,505
$12,716,600
Voluntary Alternative Housing
1
Lump Sum
2,000,000
$2,000,000
SUBTOTAL
$22,320,000
General Site Work Costs:
Fence Construction/Repair - Equipment Storage Area
1,000
LF
$28.24
$28,200
Clearingand Grubbing
63
AC
$1,332
$83,700
Land Surveying
63
AC
$697
$43,800
SUBTOTAL
$156,000
Earthwork Costs:
Excavation of Mine Waste (Excavate and Load into Trucks)
1,005,500
BCY
$2.16
$2,173,900
Excavation of Mine Waste - Dozer Scraping (25% of Volume, In Addition to Excavator) 251,375
BCY
$2.68
$673,700
General Backfill from Off-Site (Import, Place, Compact)
109,951
LCY
$30.69
$3,374,800
General Backfill from On-Site (Import, Place, Compact)
256,551
LCY
$12.11
$3,107,400
Site Restoration
63
AC
$23,807
$1,496,500
Erosion and Sediment Control
1,131
AC-YR
$735
$831,800
Dust Control
3,075
Day
$3,954
$12,159,700
Shaft Closure
2
EA
$109,522
$219,000
Adit Closure
2
EA
$50,000
$100,000
SUBTOTAL
$24,137,000
Transportation and Disposal Costs:
Hauling to Clean Harbors Facility, Deer Trail, CO
1,256,875
LCY
$180
$226,237,500
Disposal Contaminated Soil at Clean Harbors Facility, Deer Trail, CO
1,256,875
LCY
$105
$131,971,900
Dust Control
3,047
Day
$7,908
$24,094,900
SUBTOTAL
$382,304,300
Total Direct Capital Costs (Rounded to Nearest $1,000)
$428,917,000
Indirect Capital Costs
Description
%
Total Cost
Permitting/Planning/lnstitutional Controls
4%
$11,877,804
Professional/Technician - Project Management
5%
$14,847,255
Professional/Technician - Remedial Design
5%
$14,847,255
Professional/Technician - Construction Management
6%
$17,816,706
Total Indirect Capital Costs (Rounded to Nearest $1,000)
$59,389,000
Total Capital Costs
Description
%
Total Cost
Subtotal Capital Costs
$488,306,000
Contingency Allowance
15%
$73,245,900
Total Capital Cost (Rounded to Nearest $1,000)
$561,552,000
Maintenance Costs
Description
%
Total Cost
Present Worth of 10 and 30 Years Maintenance Costs Depending
the Nearest $1,000)
on Activity (Rounded to
$1,148,000
Contingency Allowance
25%
$287,000
Total Present Worth Maintenance Costs (Rounded to Nearest $1,000)
$1,435,000
Total Cost (Rounded to Nearest $1,000)
$562,987,000
Notes:
xl.25 Expansion Factor Used for all LCY quantities
x0.9 Compaction Factor Used for all CCY quantities
AC
Acre
BCY
Bank Cubic Yard
CCY
Compacted Cubic Yard
CF
Cubic Foot
EA
Each
LCY
Loose Cubic Yard
LF
Linear Foot
MO
Month
YR
Year
Page 1 of 1
-------
Table E-6. Alternative 4 Cost Estimating Assumptions
Alternative 4 Assumptions
Mobilization/Demobilization
Total Time (Days)
3.00
Clearing and Grubbing
Total Acres
63
Daily Output
4
Total Clearing Time (Days)
15.7
Hauling
Total Material (CY)
1,256,875
Daily Output (CY/trip)
25
Trip/Day/Truck
17
Total Time (Days)
3,047
Site Restoration
Total Area (Acres)
63
Volume per Acre of Imported Borrow (CY/Acre)
807
Daily Output for Importing Borrow (CY/Day/Dozer)
1,000
# of Dozers
4
Total Site Restoration Time (Days)
12.7
Inspection and Maintenance
Total Restored Excavation Area Requiring Regrading (SY)
304,242
Total Restored Excavation Area Requiring Hydroseeding Revegetation (SY)
304,242
Duration of Inspection & Maintenance of Restored Excavation Areas (years)
30
Present Worth Interest Rate (%)
7.0%
Areas requiring regrading each year (0-10) (%)
10%
Areas requiring regrading each year (10-30) (%)
5%
Areas requiring revegetation each year (0-10) (%)
25%
Areas requiring revegetation each year (10-30) (%)
10%
Equipment mobilization cost for annual maintenance ($)
666
Total Job Duration (Excluding Maintenance)
Working Days (Assume 240 days/year)
3,079
Working Months
154
Actual 9 Months (Assume 180 working days/year) to Account for Weather
205
Working Years
12.8
Actual Years (Assume 180 working days/year)
17.1
Total Job Duration
17 Years 1 Month
Notes:
CY Cubic Yard
MO Month
SY Square Yard
Page 1 of 1
-------
Table E-7. Unit Cost Breakdown
Cost Item
Cost Source
Unit Cost
Unit
Description
Support Structures
$264.86
Office trailer, furnished, rent per month, 32 foot x 8 foot,
015213200350
excluding hookups
Storage Boxes
015213201250
$95.73
Month
Storage boxes, rent per month, 20 foot x 8 foot
Field Office Lights/HVAC
015213400160
$177.57
Month
Field office expense, field office lights & HVAC
Telephone/internet
015213400140
$95.23
Month
Field office expense, telephone bill; average bill/month, incl.
long distance
Portable Toilets
015433406410
$220.92
Month
Rent toilet portable chemical
Field Office Equipment
015213400100
$248.99
Month
Field office expense, office equipment rental, average
Field Office Supplies
015213400120
$98.70
Month
Field office expense, office supplies, average
Trash
Engineering Estimate
$435.00
Month
No markup
1 @ $l,250/month MultiRAE Pro Pumped 10.6 electron volt
Air Monitoring Equipment Rental CR-1
Vendor Quote
$1,975.00
Month
and 1 @ $725/month SKC Particulate Monitor (Field
Environmental Instruments published quote)
1 @ $l,250/month MultiRAE Pro Pumped 10.6 electron volt
Air Monitoring Equipment Rental CR-1E
Vender Quote
$1,975.00
Month
and 1 @ $725/month SKC Particulate Monitor (Field
Environmental Instruments published quote)
Rental trucks 4-wheel drive
015433407200
$1,578.00
Month
Rent truck pickup 3/4 ton 4 wheel drive
4-wheel drive truck fuel
Engineering Estimate
$1,792.00
Month
No markup (Weeks x 4 = Months)
Rental cars
Vendor Quote
$1,505.00
Month
Weeks x 4 = Months
Rental car fuel
Engineering Estimate
$916.36
Month
No markup (Weeks x 4 = Months)
Submersible Pump (Month)
015433404700
$520.74
Month
Rent pump submersible electric 2 inch diameter, 120 GPM
Truck Scales (Month)
Engineering Estimate
$200.00
Month
No markup
$20.00
No markup. 432 hours/ month. Looks like they assumed 6-14
Security - Night Watchman
Engineering Estimate
hour shifts and 1-24 hour shift per week for 4 weeks.
Voluntary Alternative Housing
Per USEPA direction
$2,000,000.00
Lump Sum
Mobilization/Demobilization
Mobilization/Demobilization of
015436501300
$284.87
Each
Mobilization or demobilization, delivery charge for equipment,
Trailers/Storage Boxes
hauled on 3 ton capacity towed trailer. 50 mile roundtrip.
Temporary Electric Connect/Disconnect
$3,379.81
Meter center, main circuit breaker, rainproof, Single Phase, 3
262713102240
Each
Wire, 120/240 Volt, 400 Ampere
Large Equipment
015436501600
$2,598.31
Each
Mobilization or demobilization, delivery charge for equipment,
Mobilization/Demobilization
hauled on 50-ton capacity towed trailer. 50 miles roundtrip.
Small Equipment
$665.88
Mobilization or demobilization, delivery charge for equipment,
015436501400
hauled on 20-ton capacity towed trailer. 50 miles roundtrip.
Travel, Lodging, and Per Diem
Travel/Airfare
Engineering Estimate
$350.00
Month
1.5 trips per month @ $350
Lodging and Per Diem
CONUS Rate
$166.00
Day
CONUS rate for Gallup, NM as of 10/2023
Fence Construction/Repair
Fence, chain link industrial, galvanized steel, 3 strands barb
Fence Construction/Repair
323113200200
$28.24
LF
wire, 2 inch posts @ 10 foot on center, 9 gauge wire, 6 foot
high, Schedule 40, includes excavation, & concrete
Clearing and Grubbing
$1,331.54
Selective clearing, brush, light clearing, with dozer, ball and
311313100300
chain, excludes removal offsite
Land Surveying
Topographical Survey, Average
22113090050
$697.34
Acre
Topographical surveying, conventional, average
Excavation of Mine Waste
Excavate, place in stockpile (no utilities)
$2.16
Excavator, hydraulic, crawler mtd., 4.5 CY capacity = 340
312316435700
BCY
CY/hour. Add 15% for loading into trucks. 2720 CY/Day
$2.68
Dozer, open site, sand and gravel, 460 HP dozer, 150 foot haul,
Excavating - Dozer
312316465530
BCY
assuming 25% of waste requiring dozer
General Backfill from Off-Site
Material only, bank run gravel + Delivery charge, minimum 20
Import Borrow Soil, includes delivery
312323150020 + 312323151800 S27.54
LCY
tons, 1 hour round trip, add. B34B Crew. Assume 1.5 tons/CY
Spread dumped material, no compaction by dozer +
Place/compact backfill/cover material
312323170020 + 312323235600 $3.15
LCY
Compaction sheepsfoot or wobbly wheel roller, 6 inch lifts, 2
passes
Page 1 of 4
-------
Table E-7. Unit Cost Breakdown
Cost Item
Cost Source
Unit Cost
Unit
Description
General Backfill from On-Site
Excavate, place in stockpile (no utilities)
Load stockpiles to trucks
Off-road truck, 22 CY, 10 MPH, 2 mile
cycle
312316465530
312316435700
312323205110
$2.68
$2.16
$4.12
BCY
Place/compact backfill/cover material 312323170020 + 312323235600 $3.15
Excavating, bulk, dozer, open site, bank measure, sand and
gravel, 460 HP dozer, 150 foot haul
Excavator, hydraulic, crawler mtd., 4.5 CY capacity = 340
CY/hour. Add 15% for loading into trucks. 2,720 CY/Day
Cycle hauling(wait, load, travel, unload or dump & return) time
per cycle, excavated or borrow, loose cubic yards, 15 minute
load/wait/unload, 22 CY truck, cycle 2 mile, 10 MPH, excludes
loading equipment. Daily Output 374 LCY/Day
Spread dumped material, no compaction by dozer +
Compaction sheepsfoot or wobbly wheel roller, 6 inch lifts, 2
passes
On-Site Transportation
Hauling to CR-2
312323205110
$8.37
Place/compact backfill/cover material 312323170020 + 312323235600 $3.15
Cycle hauling (wait, load, travel, unload or dump & return)
time per cycle, excavated or borrow, loose cubic yards, 15
minute load/wait/unload, 22 CY truck, cycle 4 mile, 15 MPH,
excludes loading equipment. Added the difference between
the 2 mile cycle and the 4 mile cycle to get a 10 mile cycle to
get 6 miles round trip
Spread dumped material, no compaction by dozer +
Compaction sheepsfoot or wobbly wheel roller, 6 inch lifts, 2
passes
Transporting Waste from CR-1E to CR-1
On-road truck, 20 CY, 10 MPH, 4 mile
cycle
312323204040
Place/compact backfill/cover material 312323170020 + 312323235600
$3.51
$3.15
LCY
Cycle hauling (wait, load, travel, unload or dump & return)
time per cycle, excavated or borrow, loose cubic yards, 15
minute load/wait/unload, 20 CY truck, cycle 4 miles, 25 MPH,
excludes loading equipment. 380 CY/Day
Spread dumped material, no compaction by dozer +
Compaction sheepsfoot or wobbly wheel roller, 6 inch lifts, 2
passes
Site Restoration
Import Borrow Soil, includes delivery 312323150020 + 312323151800 $20.49
Place/compact vegetative layer 312323170020 + 312323235600
Hydroseeding
Fine Grading
Rough Grading
329219145400
312213200280
$3.15
$56.01
$0.22
$5,269.30
LCY
LCY
MSF
SY
SF
Material only, bank run gravel + Delivery charge, minimum 20
tons, 1 hour round trip, add. B34B Crew. Assume 1.5 tons/CY.
1,000 CY/Day
Spread dumped material, no compaction by dozer +
Compaction sheepsfoot or wobbly wheel roller, 6 inch lifts, 2
passes
Seeding athletic fields, seeding utility mix with mulch and
fertilizer, 7 pounds per MSF, hydro or air seeding
cost per 100,000 SF
Erosion and Sediment Control
Silt Fence, Polypropylene, 3-ft High 312514161000
Straw waddles 312514160600
$2.75
$3.94
LF
LF
Synthetic erosion control, silt fence, install and remove, 3 feet
high.
Straw in polymeric netting, biodegradable log
Dust Control
Dust Control, Heavy
312323202510
$1,976.96 Truck/Day Crew B59,1 truck/trailer and 1 driver.
Unnamed Arroyo #2 Sloping and Armoring
Excavate, place in stockpile (no utilities)
Boulders loaded on truck
Haul boulders
Place riprap
312316465400
312316302800
312316305420
313713100200
$5.51
$19.90
$7.63
$41.02
BCY
LCY
LCY
Excavating, bulk, dozer, open site, bank measure, sand and
gravel, 300 HP dozer, 300 foot haul
Boulders under 1/2 CY, loaded on truck, no hauling
Haul boulders, 25 ton off-highway dump, 2 mile round trip
Rip-rap and rock lining, random, broken stone, 18 inch
minimum thickness, machine placed for slope protection, not
grouted. Unit given in SY, multiply by 18 inches to get volume
unit cost.
Page 2 of 4
-------
Table E-7. Unit Cost Breakdown
Cost Item
Cost Source
Unit Cost
Unit
Description
Pipeline Arroyo Sloping, Armoring, and Road Rebuilding
Excavate, place in stockpile (no utilities)
312316465400
$5.51
BCY
Excavating, bulk, dozer, open site, bank measure, sand and
gravel, 300 HP dozer, 300 foot haul
Boulders loaded on truck
312316302800
$19.90
BCY
Boulders under 1/2 CY, loaded on truck, no hauling
Haul boulders
312316305420
$7.63
LCY
Haul boulders, 25 ton off-highway dump, 2 mile round trip
Rip-rap and rock lining, random, broken stone, 18 inch
Place riprap
313713100200
$41.02
LCY
minimum thickness, machine placed for slope protection, not
grouted. Unit given in SY, multiply by 18 inches to get volume
unit cost.
Base course drainage layers, aggregate base course for
Road Base
321123231513
$37.11
CCY
roadways and large paved areas, alternate method to figure
base course, crushed stone, compacted, 3/4 inch, 12 inch deep
Gravel
015523500050
$8.76
SY
Temporary, roads, gravel fill, 4 inch gravel depth, excl surfacing
Road Grading
340113100310
$565.90
Mile
Maintenance grading of roadways, roadway, 4 passes, 3 MPH
Import and Install Geotextile Fabric
Mirafi 160N/O Orange Nonwoven
Vender Quote, ACF West
$1.81
SY
Import and place Mirafi 160N/O Orange Nonwoven Geotextile
Geotextile Fabric
Geosynthetics
Fabric
Shaft Closure
Excavation
312316130050
$8.57
BCY
Excavating trench or continuous footing, common earth, 3/8 CY
excavator, 1 foot to 4 foot deep
Concrete Delivered
33113350150
$131.10
CY
Heavyweight concrete delivered 2000 psi
Forming
31113456150
$134.85
Each
12 foot x 12 foot footing form
Placing Concrete
33113704350
$25.71
CY
Place, level and consolidate, over 10 CY pumped
Hauling of Off-Site Licensed Facility
Hauling to Clean Harbors Facility, Deer
312323204114
$180.00
LCY
600 loaded miles x $5/loaded mile = $3,000 per trip /25 tons
Trail, Colorado
per trip = $120 per ton x 1.5 tons/CY = $180/LCY
Hauling to Red Rocks Disposal Facility
312323204114
$12.90
LCY
43 loaded miles x $5/loaded mile = $215 per trip/25 tons per
trip = $8.6 per ton x 1.5 tons/CY = $12.90/LCY
Disposal of Contaminated Soil at Licensed Facility
Disposal Contaminated Soil - Clean
Harbors Facility, DeerTrail, Colorado
Quote for disposal at DeerTrail,
Colorado - September 2020
(includes tax and fees)
$105.00
LCY
Price does not include hauling. $70/Ton, assume 1.5 tons/CY.
Disposal Contaminated Soil - Red Rocks
Quote for Disposal at Red Rocks
$82.50
LCY
Assumed price ($55/ton). Landfill quoted between $53 and
Disposal Facility
Disposal Facility - January 2022
$58/ton.
Transport to and Place Material at Off-Site Location
Spread dumped material, no compaction by dozer +
Place/compact backfill/cover material
312323170020 + 312323235600
$3.15
LCY
Compaction sheepsfoot or wobbly wheel roller, 6 inch lifts, 2
passes
Top Liner
HDPE Liner
Southwest Linings in Bernalillo,
New Mexico
$0.60
SF
Early 2020 estimate
Drainage Geonet
Southwest Linings in Bernalillo,
New Mexico
$0.40
SF
Early 2020 estimate
Soil Cap
Material only, bank run gravel + Delivery charge, minimum 20
Import Borrow Soil, includes delivery
312323150020 + 312323151800
$27.54
LCY
tons, 1 hour round trip, add. B34B Crew. Assume 1.5 tons/CY.
130 Ton/Day/Truck
Spread dumped material, no compaction by dozer +
Place/compact borrow
312323170020 + 312323235600
$3.15
LCY
Compaction sheepsfoot or wobbly wheel roller, 6 inch lifts, 2
passes. 1,000 LCY/Day/Truck
Excavation of Off-Site Repository
Excavate, place in stockpile (no utilities)
312316465400
$5.51
BCY
Excavating, bulk, dozer, open site, bank measure, sand and
gravel, 300 HP dozer, 300 foot haul
Soil Cap at Off-Site Repository
Spread dumped material, no compaction by dozer +
Place/compact borrow
312323170020 + 312323235600
$3.15
LCY
Compaction sheepsfoot or wobbly wheel roller, 6 inch lifts, 2
passes. 1,000 LCY/Dav/Truck
Page 3 of 4
-------
Table E-7. Unit Cost Breakdown
Cost Item
Cost Source
Unit Cost
Unit
Description
Rock Armoring on Benches
Boulders drilled and blasted
312316302900
32.07
LCY
Drilling and blasting rock, boulders, drilled and blasted
Loading
312316302800
19.9
LCY
Boulders under 1/2 CY, loaded on truck, no hauling
Hauling
312316305460
5.02
LCY
Drilling and blasting rock, 25 ton off-highway dump, 4 mile
round trip, haul boulders
Rip-rap and rock lining, random, broken stone, 18 inch
Riprap/Placing
313712100200
$82.03
SY
minimum thickness, machine placed for slope protection, not
grouted.
Fence Maintenance
Fence Inspection
Engineers Estimate
$110.00
Hour
Fence Repair
Engineers Estimate
$2.42
LF
O&M
Hydroseeding
329219145400
$56.01
MSF
Seeding athletic fields, seeding utility mix with mulch and
fertilizer, 7 pounds per MSF, hydro or air seeding
Riprap
Actual 2023 Cost
$40.00
ton
Cost from 2023 Quivira construction
Small Equipment
015436501400
$717.03
Each
Mobilization or demobilization, delivery charge for equipment,
hauled on 20-ton capacity towed trailer. 50 miles roundtrip.
Fine Grading
312213200280
$0.22
SY
Lawn Mower
015433403407
$2,546.58
Week
146.58 per week 40 hours per week operator $60/hour
Straw waddles
312514160600
$3.94
LF
Straw in polymeric netting, biodegradable log
Topographical Survey, Average
22113090050
$697.34
Acre
Topographical surveying, conventional, average
Notes:
BCY = Bank cubic yard
HDPE = High-density polyethylene
MPH = Mile per hour
CY = Cubic Yard
HP = Horse power
MSF = Thousand square foot
CCY = Compacted cubic yard
HVAC = Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning
psi = Pound per square inch
CONUS = Continental United States
LCY = Loose cubic yard
SF = Square foot
GPM = Gallon per minute
LF = Linear foot
SY = Square yard
Page 4 of 4
-------
Table E-8. Derived Costs
Cost Item
Unit Cost
Unit
Qty
Derived Unit Cost
Unit
Support Structures
Trailers
$264.86
Month
2
$529.72
Month
Storage Boxes
$95.73
Month
2
$191.46
Month
Field Office Lights/Heating/Air Conditioning
$177.57
Month
1
$177.57
Month
Telephone/internet
$95.23
Month
1
$95.23
Month
Portable Toilets
$220.92
Month
4
$883.68
Month
Field Office Equipment
$248.99
Month
1
$248.99
Month
Field Office Supplies
$98.70
Month
1
$98.70
Month
Trash
$435.00
Month
1
$435.00
Month
Air Monitoring Equipment Rental CR-1
$1,975.00
Month
1
$1,975.00
Month
Air Monitoring Equipment Rental CR-1E
$1,975.00
Month
1
$1,975.00
Month
Rental trucks 4-wheel drive
$1,578.00
Month
4
$6,312.00
Month
4-wheel drive truck fuel
$1,792.00
Month
4
$7,168.00
Month
Rental cars
$1,505.00
Month
3
$4,515.00
Month
Rental car fuel
$916.36
Month
3
$2,749.09
Month
Submersible Pump (Month)
$520.74
Month
1
$520.74
Month
Truck Scales (Month)
$200.00
Month
1
$200.00
Month
Security - Night Watchman
$20.00
Hour
432
$8,640.00
Month
Subtotal
$36,715.18
Month
Voluntary Alternative Housing
$2,000,000.00
Lump Sum
1
$2,000,000.00
Lump Sum
Mobilization/Demobilization
Mobilization/Demobilization of Trailers/Storage Boxes
$284.87
Each
4
$1,139.48
Each
Temporary Electric Connect/Disconnect
$3,379.81
Each
1
$3,379.81
Each
Large Equipment Mobilization/Demobilization
$2,598.31
Each
15
$38,974.65
Each
Small Equipment
$665.88
Each
16
$10,654.08
Each
Subtotal
$54,148.02
Each
Travel, Lodging, and Per Diem
Travel/Airfare
$350.00
Month
1.5
$525.00
Month
Lodging and Per Diem
$166.00
Day
30
$4,980.00
Month
Subtotal
$5,505.00
Month
Fence Construction/Repair
Fence Construction/Repair
$28.24
LF
1
$28.24
LF
Subtotal
$28.24
LF
Clearing and Grubbing
Clear and Grub
$1,331.54
Acre
1
$1,331.54
Acre
Subtotal
$1,331.54
Acre
Land Surveying
Land surveying, Mob/Demob
$697.34
Acre
1
$697.34
Lump Sum
Subtotal
$697.34
Lump Sum
Excavation of Mine Waste
Excavate, place in stockpile (no utilities)
$2.16
BCY
1
$2.16
BCY
Load stockpiles to trucks
$2.68
BCY
1
$2.68
BCY
Subtotal
$4.84
BCY
General Backfill from Off-Site
Import Borrow Soil, includes delivery
$27.54
LCY
1
$27.54
LCY
Place/compact backfill/cover material
$3.15
LCY
1
$3.15
LCY
Subtotal
$30.69
LCY
General Backfill from On-Site
Excavate, place in stockpile (no utilities)
$2.68
BCY
1
$2.68
BCY
Load stockpiles to trucks
$2.16
BCY
1
$2.16
BCY
Off-road truck, 22 CY, 10 MPH, 2 mile cycle
$4.12
LCY
1
$4.12
LCY
Place/compact backfill/cover material
$3.15
LCY
1
$3.15
LCY
Subtotal
$12.11
LCY
Page 1 of 3
-------
Table E-8. Derived Costs
Cost Item
Unit Cost
Unit
Qty
Derived Unit Cost
Unit
On-Site Transportation
Hauling to CR-2
$8.37
LCY
l
$8.37
LCY
Place/compact backfill/cover material
$3.15
LCY
l
$3.15
LCY
Subtotal CR-2
$11.52
LCY
Site Restoration
Import Borrow Soil, includes delivery
$20.49
LCY
806.67
$16,531.29
Acre
Place/compact vegetative layer
$3.15
LCY
806.67
$2,541.00
Acre
Hydroseeding
$56.01
MSF
43.56
$2,439.80
Acre
Rough Grading
$52.69
MSF
43.56
$2,295.18
Acre
Subtotal
$23,807.26
Acre
Erosion and Sediment Control
Silt Fence, Polypropylene, 3-foot High
$2.75
LF
210
$577.50
Acre
Straw Waddles
$3.94
LF
40
$157.60
Acre
Subtotal
$735.10
Acre
Dust Control On-Site Alternative
Dust Control, Heavy
$1,976.96
Truck/Day
4
$7,907.84
Day
Subtotal
$7,907.84
Day
Dust Control Off-Site Alternatives
Dust Control, Heavy
$1,976.96
BCY
2
$3,953.92
Day
Subtotal
$3,953.92
Day
Unnamed Arroyo #2 Sloping and Armoring
Excavate, place in stockpile (no utilities)
$5.51
BCY
3700
$20,387.00
Boulders loaded on truck
$19.90
LCY
2500
$49,750.00
Haul boulders
$7.63
LCY
2500
$19,075.00
Place riprap
$41.02
LCY
2500
$102,537.50
Subtotal
$191,749.50
Lump Sum
Pipeline Arroyo Sloping, Armoring, and Road Rebuilding
Excavate, place in stockpile (no utilities)
$5.51
BCY
3700
$20,387.00
Boulders loaded on truck
$19.90
LCY
2500
$49,750.00
Haul boulders
$7.63
LCY
2500
$19,075.00
Place riprap
$41.02
LCY
2500
$102,537.50
Road Base
$37.11
CCY
370
$13,744.44
Gravel
$8.76
SY
10000
$87,600.00
Road Grading
$565.90
Mile
0.09
$53.59
$293,147.53
Lump Sum
Shaft Closure
Excavation
$8.57
BCY
20
$171.40
Concrete Delivered
$131.10
CY
230
$30,153.00
Forming
$134.85
Each
2
$269.70
Placing Concrete
$25.71
CY
230
$5,913.30
Subtotal
$36,507.40
Complexity and Remoteness Multiplier
3
$109,522.20
Each
Adit Closure
Lump sum assumption
$50,000.00
Each
1
$50,000.00
$50,000.00
Each
Hauling to Off-Site Licensed Facility
Hauling to Clean Harbors Facility, Deer Trail, Colorado
$180.00
LCY
1
$180.00
LCY
Hauling to Red Rocks Disposal Facility
$12.90
LCY
1
$12.90
LCY
Disposal of Contaminated Soil at Licensed Facility
Disposal Contaminated Soil - Clean Harbors Facility, Deer
$105.00
LCY
1
$105.00
LCY
Trail, Colorado
Disposal Contaminated Soil - Red Rocks Disposal Facility
$82.50
LCY
1
$82.50
LCY
Page 2 of 3
-------
Table E-8. Derived Costs
Cost Item
Unit Cost
Unit
Qty
Derived Unit Cost
Unit
Transport to and Place Material at Off-Site Location
Hauling to CR-2
$8.37
LCY
l
$8.37
LCY
Place/compact backfill/cover material
$3.15
LCY
l
$3.15
LCY
Subtotal
$11.52
LCY
Soil Cap
Import Borrow Soil, includes delivery
$27.54
LCY
1.11
$30.60
CCY
Place/compact borrow
$3.15
LCY
1.11
$3.50
CCY
Subtotal
$34.10
CCY
Rock Armoring on Benches
Boulders drilled and blasted
$32.07
LCY
1
$32.07
LCY
Loading
$19.90
LCY
1
$19.90
LCY
Hauling
$5.02
LCY
1
$5.02
LCY
Riprap/Placing
$82.03
SY
1
$82.03
LCY
Subtotal
$139.02
LCY
Fence Maintenance
Fence Inspection
$110.00
Hour
10
$1,100.00
Event
Fence Repair
$2.42
LF
250
$605.00
Event
Subtotal
$1,705.00
Event
Maintenance
Revegetation (30 years)
Hydroseeding
56.01
MSF
43.56
$2,439.80
Acre
Small Equipment
717.03
Each
1
$717.03
Year
Regrading/Erosion Control (10 years)
Small Equipment
717.03
Each
1
$717.03
Year
Fine Grading
0.22
SY
1
$0.22
SY
Riprap
40
ton
500
$20,000.00
year
Silt Fence, Polypropylene, 3-foot High
$2.75
LF
210
$577.50
Acre
Straw Waddles
$3.94
LF
40
$157.60
Acre
Cap Weed Control (30 years)
Lawn Mower
2546.58
Week
0.5
$1,273.29
Year
Inspection/Vegetation Survey (30 years)
Topographical Survey, Average
697.34
Acre
62.86
$43,834.79
Year
Notes:
BCY = Bank cubic yard LF = Linear foot X1.25 Expansion Factor Used for LCY quantities
CY = Cubic yard MPH = Mile per hour X0.9 Compaction Factor Used for CCY quantities
CCY = Compacted cubic yard MSF = Thousand square foot
LCY = Loose cubic yard SY = Square yard
Page 3 of 3
-------
Table E-9. Derived Quantities
Region
Areas Outside Capped Waste Piles
Requiring Restoration (AC)
General Backfill Volume (BCY)
Soil Cap
Volume (BCY)
Off-Site Disposal Volumes
(BCY)
On Site Transport
Volumes (BCY)
Onsite
Red Rocks
KCKA or
LLRW
Onsite
Red Rocks
KCKA or
LLRW
Onsite
Red Rocks
RCRA or LLRW
Onsite
Cover on Waste Pile (Footprint)
Outer Perimeter
East Side Toe
East Side
Western Toe
Southern Toe
Pond 1
Pond 1A
Unreclaimed Pond
Pond 3
Pond 2
Lower Pond 5 Hotspot
Lower Pond 5 Hotspot
Lower Pond 6c
Lower Pond 6b
20.93
20.93
20.93
135,095
135,095
135,095
33,771.92
33,771.92
33,771.92
7.31
7.31
7.31
11,798
11,798
11,798
11,797.64
11,797.64
11,797.64
1.52
1.52
1.52
3,671
3,671
3,671
3,670.82
3,670.82
3,670.82
1.65
1.65
1.65
5,334
5,334
5,334
5,334.33
5,334.33
5,334.33
1.63
1.63
1.63
3,955
3,955
3,955
3,954.83
3,954.83
3,954.83
1.88
1.88
1.88
12,150
12,150
12,150
12,150.04
12,150.04
12,150.04
0.62
0.62
0.62
13,950
13,950
13,950
13,950.07
13,950.07
13,950.07
0.15
0.15
0.15
1,959
1,959
1,959
1,959.14
1,959.14
1,959.14
1.95
1.95
1.95
21,978
21,978
21,978
21,978.13
21,978.13
21,978.13
0.23
0.23
0.23
3,671
3,671
3,671
3,671.59
3,671.59
3,671.59
0.21
0.21
0.21
6,587
6,587
6,587
6,587.37
6,587.37
6,587.37
0.07
0.07
0.07
795
795
795
794.57
794.57
794.57
0.06
0.06
0.06
3,934
3,934
3,934
393.39
393.39
393.39
0.30
0.30
0.30
3,361
3,361
3,361
3,360.84
3,360.84
3,360.84
0.22
0.22
0.22
2,438
2,438
2,438
2,438.37
2,438.37
2,438.37
CR-1 Existing Waste Pile
803,325.00
803,325.00
803,325.00
CR-1 Total
38.73
38.73
38.73
230,676
230,676
230,676
929,200
929,200
929,200
North Industrial
Hotspot
Surface 1
Surface 2
Surface 3
Surface 4
Outer Perimeter
0.50
0.50
0.50
2,015
2,015
2,015
2,014.76
2,014.76
2,014.76
0.05
0.05
0.05
427
427
427
426.65
426.65
426.65
0.06
0.06
0.06
141
141
141
140.83
140.83
140.83
3.80
3.80
3.80
9,207
9,207
9,207
9,206.78
9,206.78
9,206.78
0.02
0.02
0.02
51
51
51
49.92
49.92
49.92
0.01
0.01
0.01
28
28
28
28.40
28.40
28.40
4.46
4.46
4.46
7,202
7,202
7,202
7,201.56
7,201.56
7,201.56
CR-1E Existing Waste Piles
2.55
2.55
2.55
16,456
16,456
16,456
30,168
30,168
30,168
CR-1E Total
11.5
11.5
11.5
35,526
35,526
35,526
49,300
49,300
49,300
KMP UNC Hotspot
KMP UNC Hotspot 4ft
KMP UNC Hotspot 6 ft
KMP UNC Hotspot 6 ft
KMP UNC Perimeter
KMP NN Perimeter
KMP NN Hotspot
0.00
0.00
0.00
-
-
-
-
-
-
1.01
1.01
1.01
6,531.01
6,531.01
6,531.01
6,531.01
6,531.01
6,531.01
0.07
0.07
0.07
642.49
642.49
642.49
642.49
642.49
642.49
0.08
0.08
0.08
817.47
817.47
817.47
817.47
817.47
817.47
9.42
9.42
9.42
15,201.34
15,201.34
15,201.34
15,201.34
15,201.34
15,201.34
1.84
1.84
1.84
2,973.26
2,973.26
2,973.26
2,973.24
2,973.24
2,973.24
0.26
0.26
0.26
834.07
834.07
834.07
834.12
834.12
834.12
Kerr McGee Pond Total
12.7
12.7
12.7
26,999.64
26,999.64
26,999.64
27,000
27,000
27,000
Cap Area (acres)
10
Total Quantities
62.9
62.9
62.9
293,202
293,202
293,202
64,533
1,005,500
1,005,500
1,005,500
Truckloads
2120
2120
2120
18,330
18,330
18,330
4,040
76,180
76,180
57,140
Page 1 of 2
-------
Table E-9. Derived Quantities
Riprap Volume
LF
11.3 FT Slope
LF
8.49 FT
Slope
Total SF
SY
CY
(Assuming
3ft Depth)
CR-1
8,245
93,169
0
0
93,169
10,352
10,352
CR-1E
3,516
39,731
2,146
18,220
57,950
6,439
6,439
Canyon Repository Area
10.00 ACRES
Riprap Volume (LCY)
Alternative 2
10,352
Alternative 3
16,971
Alternative 4
16,971
Off Site Truckloads Site Restoration
Alternative 2
24,490
Alternative 3
96,630
Alternative 4
96,630
Notes:
BCY
CY
LF
LLRW
Bank cubic yard
Cubic yard
Linear foot
Low-level radioactive waste
RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
SF Square foot
SY Square yard
Page 2 of 2
-------
Table E-10. Inspection and Maintenance Breakdown
Percent Revegetation (0-10 years):
25%
Percent Revegetation (10-30 years):
10%
Percent Regrading (0-10 years):
10%
Percent Regrading (10-30 years):
5%
Percent Erosion Control:
10%
Total Site Area Square Yards:
304,242
CR-2 Cap Area Square yards:
48,400
Alternative 2
All Alternatives
Duration
Activity
Cap Only
Entire Site
10 years Maintenance
Revegetation (Square Yards)
12,100
76,061
Regrading (Square Yards)
35,264
30,424
30 years Maintenance
Erosion Control (Acre)
1
6
100 years Maintenance
Inspection
12,100
76,061
Present Value Calculations
Years (n)
5
4.100197436
Interest (i)
0.07
Years (n)
10
7.023581541
Interest (i)
0.07
Years (n)
30
12.40904118
Interest (i)
0.07
Years (n)
100
14.26925071
Interest (i)
0.07
Quivira Present Worth of Maintenance - 7%
Alternative 2
Cap Only
Entire Site for All
Alternatives
Alternative 2
Total
0 to 10 years
Maintenance
Revegetation
$46,335
$279,496
$325,831
Regrading/Erosion Control
$27,192.52
$66,724.98
$93,917
10 to 30 years
Maintenance
Revegetation
$31,165
$199,210
$230,375
Regrading/Erosion Control
$24,021.44
$58,943.79
$82,965
0 to 30 years
Maintenance
Site Inspection
$0.00
$543,947.74
$543,948
0 to 100 years
Maintenance
Cap Inspection
$99,505.19
$0.00
$99,505
Total Maintenance
$228,219
$1,148,322
$1,376,542
Page 1 of 2
-------
Table E-10. Inspection and Maintenance Breakdown
Assumptions
1% Interest Rate
Offsite Cap Area based on percentage of overall repository capacity needed for Quivira
Assuming 10% of repository cap will require regrading/erosion control each year (0-10)
Assuming 5% of repository cap will require regrading/erosion control each year (10-30)
Assuming 25% of repository cap will require revegetation each year (0-10)
Assuming 10% of repository cap will require revegetation each year (10-30)
Assuming 10% of areas not capped will require regrading/erosion control each year (0-10)
Assuming 5% of areas not capped will require regrading/erosion control each year (10-30)
Assuming 25% of areas not capped will require revegetation each year (0-10)
Assuming 10% of areas not capped will require revegetation each year (10-30)
$717.03 - Equipment mobilization cost for annual maintenance
500 tons riprap per year, $40/ton
Page 2 of 2
-------
APPENDIX F
POST-RESTORATION VISUALIZATIONS
-------
^7^"" -r—
* ¦* V-3*~. **c*
p&gsHBi
EXISTING CONDITIONS - CR-1
*-•¦ •/:•:./-:. : .-^V".-**' 'J.* >:
gy * rWHB«aapa^> - • i
PROPOSED RECLAMATION - CR-1
Conceptual CR-1 Repository
Post-Removal Action
It
TETRATECH
-------
;*r- -V T
1
'^•" '' v •
^ -X':-. \ V, • • -
? •-:-v- »•>¦ . vuvlHESJk' *
... &
**®£ \
i f - •'- • Yip
•*-: .. V
• H &
<. '" > .*-. i*
-• --
Conceptual Canyon Repository
Post-Removal Action
TETRATECH
------- |