v>EPA

United States
Environmental Protection
Agency

United States

Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Enforcement and
Compliance Assurance

Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response

January 2013

Preliminary Compilation of Possible
EPA Activities to Engage Communities
in Superfund Enforcement

Under the Community Engagement Initiative (CEI), the EPA has prepared a preliminary
compilation of possible activities for involving the public in Superfund enforcement. The table
below provides a summary of the activities. The complete report is available from the CEI
website at http://www.epa.gov/communityengagement.html. The EPA is interested in receiving
input from external stakeholders (including communities, potentially responsible parties (PRPs),
and state, tribal and local governments) about these possible activities and any others that might
prove beneficial. Information on providing input to the draft report is also available from the CEI
website.

Superfund enforcement cases vary greatly and there's no one-size-fits-all when it comes to
activities for involving the public in such cases. Case teams would continue to exercise
discretion and consider employing these ideas only as appropriate given the specific
circumstances of their particular site.

POSSIBLE
ACTIVITY

DESCRIPTION

Solicit information
from the public for
the PRP search

Actively solicit information from the public as to the identity of PRPs
and/or information about their waste-handling practices.

-	Place advertisements in local newspapers asking former
employees to call an EPA toll-free number and provide
information on the company's disposal practices
Community involvement coordinators (CICs) interviewing
community members for their views on the cleanup can also ask
about possible PRPs

-	EPA investigators can canvass door-to-door in order to obtain
information about PRPs

Require PRPs to
assist with EPA's
community
involvement efforts

The EPA's settlements and unilateral administrative orders (UAOs)
for a remedial investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) and remedial
design/remedial action (RD/RA) typically contain provisions that
obligate PRPs to provide assistance, at the Agency's request, with
community involvement efforts. The EPA personnel can invoke these
provisions and direct the PRPs, e.g., to establish a community
information repository near the site and/or to prepare information for
dissemination to the public.


-------
POSSIBLE
ACTIVITY

DESCRIPTION

Issue site-specific fact
sheets that explain
the settlement
negotiations

Case teams can issue fact sheets about upcoming/ongoing
negotiations in order to "de-mystify" the enforcement process for the
public. The fact sheets can explain in general terms what topics
would be covered by the negotiations and, more importantly, what
topics would not be covered. This can help reassure communities that
the EPA does not negotiate cleanup standards or the decision as to
what the cleanup will entail with PRPs behind closed doors.

Distribute EPA's
generic fact sheet on
the Superfund
enforcement process
and/or present EPA's
generic workshop on
Superfund

The EPA Headquarters has prepared a generic fact sheet titled, "The
Superfund Enforcement Process: How It Works." CICs can make
hard-copies of this fact sheet, along with other general background
materials about the Superfund program, available at public meetings.
CICs can also present a generic workshop that explains the basics of
the Superfund program, including enforcement.

Give the public an
opportunity to
comment on a
proposed AOC for
RI/FS or removal

After PRPs sign an administrative order on consent (AOC) for RI/FS
or removal, the EPA can solicit public comment on the proposed
settlement before deciding whether to sign it and have it take effect.
(To date, the EPA has done this in only rare situations.)

Put the RI/FS or
removal settlement
agreement in the
form of a judicial
consent decree

Unlike administrative agreements, judicial consent decrees are
required to go through a public comment process and a review by an
independent third party (i.e., the district court judge). This practice
can be useful in situations where the community wants assurance that
the EPA and the PRPs have negotiated at arms' length. (Similar to
above, the EPA has done this in only rare cases.)

Explicitly reserve
EPA's right to seek
modifications to
AOC in light of later
public comments

In an administrative settlement agreement, the EPA can explicitly
reserve its right to seek modifications to the AOC in the future in the
event that it receives public comments that disclose facts or
considerations which indicate that the AOC is inappropriate,
improper, or inadequate. (Again, the EPA has done this only in rare
instances.)

Conduct outreach to
solicit public input on
proposed settlements

The EPA can aggressively seek public input on proposed settlements
(e.g., AOCs for RI/FS and removal, lodged consent decrees for
RD/RA, cost-recovery settlements that provide resources for future
response work). The Agency can, e.g., issue a press release or make
statements at public meetings alerting the community to the
opportunity to review and comment on proposed settlements before
they are finalized.

2


-------
POSSIBLE
ACTIVITY

DESCRIPTION

Have the Community
Involvement Plan
reviewed by the
Regional attorney

Ensure that the community involvement plan (CIP) is reviewed not
only by the Region's technical staff and community relations
personnel but also by the Regional attorney assigned to the case. The
Regional attorney is sometimes well-positioned to identify
opportunities for PRP participation (subject to EPA oversight) in the
community involvement activities. While the EPA personnel are
encouraged to review the CIP throughout the cleanup, they are
required, at a minimum, to review the initial CIP before the RI/FS (or
non-time critical removal (NTCR)) and then re-visit the plan before
the RD.

Make draft
deliverables
submitted by PRPs
available to the
public

PRPs are typically required to provide drafts of various documents
(e.g., work plans for RI/FS or RD) to EPA for review. Typically with
the PRPs' consent, the Agency can publicly share the initial drafts or
the drafts that have undergone a preliminary EPA review.

While negotiations
are ongoing, hold
public meetings on
technical issues

The EPA's settlement negotiations with PRPs are usually conducted
in confidential sessions. While negotiations are ongoing, the two
sides can meet with the public to discuss technical issues.

Remind public that
PRP activities are
subject to EPA
oversight and
approval

EPA's fact sheets about ongoing response activities can note that the
Agency is overseeing the PRPs' activities to ensure that they are
being performed correctly. The fact sheets can provide information
about EPA's reviews of PRP-submitted plans and the changes to such
plans as the result of the Agency's reviews.

Include settlement
provisions for
Technical Assistance
Plans

The EPA can include technical assistance plan (TAP) provisions in
settlements (typically employing the Superfund Alternative
Approach). Such provisions obligate the PRPs, at the EPA's request,
to arrange at their own expense for a community group to obtain the
services of an independent technical advisor and share information
with others in the community.

Seek public input on

possible

Supplemental

Environmental

Projects

Noncompliance with a Superfund-related obligation can give rise to
claims for Superfund penalties. In negotiating a settlement for such
penalty claims, EPA can sometimes negotiate a provision for a
supplemental environmental project (SEP). The EPA can seek public
input on ideas for a possible SEP in a particular case (or even in a
specific geographic area even though noncompliance hasn't even
occurred yet).

3


-------
POSSIBLE
ACTIVITY

DESCRIPTION

Facilitate the process
of making site
information available
(for potential citizen-
suit plaintiffs or
other members of the
public)

The EPA can facilitate the process of making relevant site
information available to potential citizen-suit plaintiffs or any other
interested community member. It can do so, e.g., by routinely adding
relevant documents to the site file and/or posting documents in on-
line "reading rooms" on Agency websites. The EPA is currently
piloting an effort involving posting on-line information identifying
the next steps in certain cleanups and the schedule for their
implementation

4


-------