BLADES GROUNDWATER SUPERFUND SITE
BLADES, SUSSEX COUNTY, DELAWARE
OPERABLE UNIT 2
RECORD OF DECISION
FOR INTERIM ACTION
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Region 3
1600 John F. Kennedy Boulevard
Philadelphia, PA 19103-2852
February 2024
-------
BLADES GROUNDWATER
SUPERFUND SITE OPERABLE UNIT 2
BLADES, SUSSEX COUNTY, DELEWARE
RECORD OF DECISION
FOR INTERIM ACTION
Table of Contents
1. DECLARATION 1
2. DECISION SUMMARY 4
I. SITE NAME, LOCATION, AND DESCRIPTION 4
II. SITE HISTORY AND ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES 4
III. HIGHLIGHTS OF COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION 9
IV. SCOPE OF THE SELECTED REMEDY 9
V. SITE CHARACTERISTICS 10
A. Physical Setting 10
B. Geology 10
C. Nature and Extent of Contamination 11
D. National Historical Preservation Act 11
VI. CURRENT AND POTENTIAL FUTURE LAND AND RESOURCE USES 11
VII. SUMMARY OF SITE RISKS 12
A. Human Health Risk Assessment Summary 13
B. Summary of Ecological Risk Assessment 16
C. Summary of Site Risks 16
VIII. REMEDIAL ACTION OBJECTIVES 16
IX. SUMMARY OF REMEDIAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES 17
X. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES 20
A. Criteria Used to Compare Cleanup Alternatives 20
B. Detailed Analysis of Proposed Remedial Alternatives 21
i
-------
XI. SELECTED REMEDY 26
A. Summary of the Rationale for the Selected Remedy 27
B. Summary of the Estimated Costs 28
C. Performance Standards 28
D. Expected Outcome of the Selected Remedy 28
XII. STATUTORY DETERMINATIONS 28
A. Compliance with Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements 29
B. Cost-Effectiveness 29
C. Utilization of Permanent Solutions and Alternative Treatment Technologies to
the Maximum Extent Practicable and Preference for Treatment as a Principal
Element 30
D. Five Year Review Requirements 30
E. Documentation of Significant Changes 30
3. RESPONSIVENESS SUMMARY 31
TABLES
Table 1 - Risk Findings
Table 2 - Remedial Alternatives Evaluated
Table 3 - Evaluation Criteria for Superfund Remedial Alternatives
Table 4 - Cost Estimate of Alternatives
FIGURES
Figure 1 - Site Location Map
Figure 2 - Site Layout
Figure 3 - 2021-2022 Residential Well Sampling
Figure 4 - Selected Remedy - Water Main Extension
APPENDICES
Appendix A-Administrative Record Index
Appendix B - ARARs and TBCs
Appendix C - Risk Assessment Calculations
Appendix D - Detailed Cost Estimate
Appendix E - DNREC Concurrence Letter
ii
-------
RECORD OF DECISION FOR INTERIM ACTION
BLADES GROUNDWATER SUPERFUND SITE
OPERABLE UNIT 2
1. DECLARATION
Site Name and Location
The Blades Groundwater Superfund Site (Site) is located in Blades, Sussex County, Delaware.
The Site was placed on the National Priorities List (NPL) on September 3, 2020. The National
Superfund Database Identification Number is DEN000304203. For administrative purposes the
Site has been separated into two Operable Units. Operable Unit 1 (OU1) addresses
contaminated media Site-wide. Operable Unit 2 (OU2) addresses public exposure to
contaminants in private drinking water wells from contaminated groundwater. This Record of
Decision (ROD) for interim action only addresses the remedy for OU2. A remedy for OU1 will be
addressed in a separate and subsequent ROD.
Statement of Basis and Purpose
This ROD presents the selected interim remedial action (Selected Remedy) for OU2. The
Selected Remedy was chosen in accordance with the requirements of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601
et seq., as amended, and, to the extent practicable, the National Oil and Hazardous Substances
Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP), 40 C.F.R. Part 300. This decision document explains the
factual and legal basis for the Selected Remedy for OU2 at the Site. The information supporting
this decision is contained in the Administrative Record (AR) for the Site, which was developed in
accordance with Section 113(k) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9613(k). This AR file is available for
review online at https://semspub.epa.gov/src/collection/03/AR67374. The AR file index
(Appendix A) identifies each document contained in the AR file upon which the selection of the
remedy is based. The signed ROD will become part of the AR for the Site.
The Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC) concurs
with the Selected Remedy for OU2 (Appendix E).
Assessment of the Site
The Selected Remedy in this ROD for interim action is necessary to protect public health or
welfare or the environment from actual or threatened releases of hazardous substances,
pollutants, or contaminants into the environment.
1
-------
Description of the Selected Remedy
The Selected Remedy for 0U2 addresses exposure to current and future residents to
groundwater containing unacceptable levels of Site-related contamination.
The contamination at the Site consists of heavy metals (including cobalt, hexavalent chromium,
and lead) and perfluoroalkyl/polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in groundwater. Groundwater is
the sole drinking water source for both public and domestic potable water in Blades and the
surrounding area. Residences within the town limits of Blades are connected to the public
water supply, which treats groundwater prior to distribution; however, residences located
beyond town limits to the southwest rely on domestic groundwater wells for potable water.
The area subject to this Selected Remedy are the residences located south and southwest,
outside of the town limits of Blades, bounded by Morgan Branch and the Nanticoke River as
depicted in Figure 2.
The Selected Remedy (Alternative 5) consists of the following components:
1. Extending an existing public water line and connecting residential properties whose
private wells are currently impacted or potentially impacted by Site-related
contaminants.
2. Implementing institutional controls such as local ordinances and/or groundwater
management zones to prevent the installation of new potable wells.
3. Maintaining existing point-of-entry treatment systems (POETS) / point-of-use treatment
systems (POUTS) until connection to the public water line is complete.
The Selected Remedy will ensure long-term public protection from contaminated groundwater
until groundwater is restored to beneficial use under OU1.
Statutory Determinations
The Selected Remedy is protective of human health and the environment, complies with
Federal and State requirements that are legally applicable or relevant and appropriate to the
remedial action, is cost-effective, and utilizes permanent solutions to the maximum extent
practicable.
Because this Selected Remedy will result in hazardous substances remaining on-Site above
levels that allow for unlimited use and unrestricted exposure, a review will be conducted within
five years after commencement of the interim remedial action to ensure that the remedy
continues to provide adequate protection of human health and the environment. Such reviews
will be conducted a minimum of every five years thereafter, until EPA determines that
hazardous substances remaining at the Site do not prevent unlimited use and unrestricted
exposure at the Site.
2
-------
ROD Data Certification Checklist
The following information is included in the Decision Summary (Part 2) of this ROD. Additional
information can be found in the Administrative Record for the Site:
ROD CERTIFICATION CHECKLIST
Information
Location/Page Number
Contaminants of Concern (COCs) and respective
concentrations
Section VII, page 13
Baseline risk represented by COCs
Section VII, page 15
Cleanup levels established for COCs and the basis for
these levels
Section XI, page 27
Current and reasonably anticipated future land use
assumptions potential future beneficial uses of
groundwater used in the baseline risk assessment and
ROD
Section VI, page 11
Potential land and groundwater uses that will be
available at the Site as a result of the Selected Remedy
Section VI, page 11
Estimated capital, annual Operations & Maintenance
(O&M), and total present worth costs, discount rate, and
the number of years over which the remedy cost
estimates are projected
Section X, page 26
Key factors that led to selecting the remedy
Section XI, page 26
Authorizing Signature
This ROD for interim action documents the Selected Remedy for OU2 of the Site. EPA selected
this interim remedial action with the concurrence of DNREC.
Digitally signed by PAUL
PAUL LEONARD LEONARD
Date: 2024.02.09 12:53:56 -05'00'
Paul Leonard, Director
Superfund and Emergency Management Division
EPA Region 3
3
-------
INTERIM RECORD OF DECISION
BLADES GROUNDWATER SUPERFUND SITE
OPERABLE UNIT 2
2. DECISION SUMMARY
I. SITE NAME, LOCATION, AND DESCRIPTION
The Site is located within the Town of Blades, Sussex County, Delaware. The Site is
approximately 0.5 square miles, lying primarily between the Nanticoke River, Morgan Branch,
and Route 13 (See Figure 1). The Site was finalized on the National Priorities List (NPL) on
September 3, 2020. The National Superfund Database Identification Number for this Site is
DEN000304203. Contaminants commonly related to plating operations including metals and
per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have been detected in residential drinking water
downgradient of the Site. EPA Region 3 is the lead agency for the Site, and DNREC is the
support agency.
II. SITE HISTORY AND ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES
There are two likely source areas of contamination related to this Site located in the Town of
Blades: Procino Plating (now known as Procino Enterprises), an active metal plating facility, and
the former Peninsula Plating facility, which is currently vacant land. The locations of Procino
Plating and former Peninsula Plating are shown in Figure 2. Below is a brief overview of the
operational history and environmental investigations conducted at both facilities, prior to the
Site being listed on the NPL. Additional information regarding these investigations can be found
in Sections 2.2 and 2.3 of the June 2019 Final Site Inspection (SI) Report. Investigations prior to
2018 did not include the collection or analysis of PFAS.
Procino Plating
Procino Plating is an active plating facility that began operations in Blades in 1985, performing
ornamental/decorative plating with copper, nickel, and chromium (See Figure 2). From 1994-
2002, Procino Plating received a series of Notices of Violation (NOVs) from DNREC and EPA
citing labeling, training and operational deficiencies related to handling of hazardous waste.
Procino Plating responded with notification letters stating that the deficiencies had been
corrected. None of the NOVs cited spillage, discharges, or releases of hazardous wastes. In
December 2007 and February 2008, DNREC and EPA conducted inspections, collected samples,
and interviewed employees at the Procino Plating. These inspections coincided with the 2007
discontinuation of plating operations in the second building when equipment was being
dismantled to create rental space. Procino Plating was issued an NOV pursuant to the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The operational and regulatory histories of the Procino
Plating facility led to DNREC, in cooperation with EPA, conducting a preliminary assessment (PA)
4
-------
at Procino Plating in 2010 due to chemical use, primarily metals, and the potential impact to soil
and groundwater.
During the 2010 PA, photographs were taken that showed the presence of Atotech Fumetrol®
140. Fumetrol is used as a mist suppressant to control the emission of chromium mists created
during the plating process. Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) is an active ingredient within
Fumetrol 140. PFOS was not identified or investigated as a contaminant of concern in 2010
since there was not as much toxicity data or analytical methods available as there are now. As a
result of the PA, a site investigation was recommended due to chemical use and the potential
to impact soil and groundwater. DNREC performed the SI activities in 2010 and 2011.
The SI included sampling any registered/permitted private water supply wells within the Town
of Blades limits. Water samples were collected from outdoor spigots of residential homes with
registered and accessible private wells where access was granted. Twelve private water supply
wells surrounding the Procino Plating facility were sampled. Soil and groundwater samples
were collected and analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs), semivolatile organic
compounds (SVOCs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), pesticides, and for total and dissolved
target analyte list (TAL) inorganics on the Procino Plating property. Based on the results, DNREC
recommended further investigation. Procino Plating entered into a Voluntary Cleanup Program
agreement with DNREC in 2011 to complete the investigation.
From 2012 to 2015, Procino Plating's contractor performed various remedial investigation (Rl)
activities to characterize subsurface stratigraphy, determine groundwater elevations and flow
direction, determine the extent and magnitude of contamination, and assess potential human
health risks. Soil and groundwater at Procino Plating were not analyzed for PFAS during this
investigation.
In 2015, an interim removal action was completed by Procino Plating's contractor that
consisted of removing a portion of the facility's concrete slab floor, collecting soil samples for
the purpose of delineating chromium concentrations, and removing chromium impacted soil
with a mini excavator. Approximately 20 cubic yards of soil were removed from a 10-foot by 10-
foot area to depths of 6 to 8 feet below ground surface (bgs). A polyvinyl chloride (PVC) piping
system was also installed to facilitate potential future remedial injections.
In 2018, a chromic acid tank was overfilled with water and overflowed into a secondary
containment and crawlspace beneath the building. The total volume of solution spilled was
unknown, but 600 gallons were captured in the secondary containment. Procino Plating's
contractor removed the impacted soil for off-site disposal.
Peninsula Plating
The former Peninsula Plating facility was located within the former Blades Commercial Complex
at the intersection of Market Street and River Road (See Figure 2). Peninsula Plating operated
from 1992 to 1995 conducting brass, copper, and chrome plating operations. In 1995 the
5
-------
DNREC Hazardous Waste Management Branch conducted a site visit at the Peninsula Plating
facility. DNREC noted the presence of plating process chemicals, including nickel sulfate, sulfuric
acid, chromic acid, hexavalent chromium, hydrofluoric acid, nickel chloride, copper cyanide,
copper sulfate, zinc cyanide, and cadmium fluoroborate. Peninsula Plating closed shortly
thereafter, following a history of noncompliance with industrial waste discharge permits and
Emergency Planning and Community-Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) requirements.
DNREC's Emergency Response and Enforcement Branches informed EPA Region 3 that the
former plating building contained numerous vats, tanks, drums, and containers of hazardous
materials. EPA conducted a CERCLA Removal Action at the abandoned Peninsula Plating facility
in mid to late 1995. The removal action included the removal of 78 55-gallon drums of
hazardous waste and 30 cubic yards of hazardous solids, including flammable and corrosive
liquids, oxidizers, and liquids contaminated with cadmium and chromium. DNREC performed an
SI at Peninsula Plating in 1999. Samples collected during the SI included soil and groundwater
samples from three on-site monitoring wells and one public supply well. With the exception of
the concentrations of arsenic, inorganics were not detected in the soil samples at
concentrations exceeding EPA or DNREC standards. Chromium was detected in three soil
samples at concentrations ranging from 2.4 mg/kg to 9.4 mg/kg. Organic analysis of soil
samples indicated several polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) at concentrations exceeding
EPA and DNREC standards. Analysis of groundwater samples indicated concentrations of
aluminum, iron, and manganese in the on-site monitoring wells at concentrations above DNREC
regulatory standards and/or EPA maximum contaminant levels (MCLs). Chromium was not
detected in the collected groundwater samples. Organic constituents were not detected in
groundwater at concentrations exceeding the EPA or DNREC standards.
Based on the Procino and Peninsula facilities' operational and regulatory histories, previous
investigations, and the advancement of PFAS testing, EPA and DNREC furthered their
investigations. In 2018, EPA, in coordination with DNREC, conducted a site-wide investigation
(2018 SI) to further define the extent of contamination, assess the relative threat posed to
human health and the environment, and determine the need for additional action under
CERCLA.
Public Supply Well Sampling
All residences within the corporate limits of the Town of Blades are connected to the municipal
water supply. The Town of Blades maintains three municipal water supply wells. In February
2018, based on information pertaining to the use of PFAS at metal plating facilities and
potential hazards associated with consumption of PFAS, DNREC, in consultation with EPA,
collected samples from the Town of Blades' municipal supply wells to analyze for PFAS. Results
indicated each of the three public supply wells had a summed total concentration of
perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) ranging from 96.2 ppt
to 187.1 ppt,1 which was greater than the combined health advisory level (HAL) of 70 parts per
1 In 2016 EPA released a HAL for combined PFOA and PFOS at 70 ppt. At the time of this sampling, the HAL of 70
ppt was the level DNREC was acting upon. On June 15, 2022, EPA issued interim updated drinking water health
advisories for PFOA at 0.004 ppt and PFOS at 0.02 ppt that superseded those EPA issued in 2016.
6
-------
trillion (ppt). As a result of the HAL exceedance, DNREC and Delaware Department of Health
(DPH) began distributing alternative water to Blades' residents as a precautionary measure. On
February 19, 2018, DNREC funded and installed a carbon filtration system on the Blades water
supply system. On February 28, 2018, DNREC and DPH announced that a follow-up sampling of
the treated Blades water supply, in conjunction with the carbon filtration system, showed non-
detect levels for PFAS. The public water system continues to be sampled on a reoccurring basis
to ensure protectiveness and the sample results continue to be below standards.
Residential Well Sampling
Residences outside of the Blades town limits are served by private domestic wells. In February,
March, and April of 2018, EPA collected domestic well water samples from 54 locations for
PFAS analysis. PFAS concentrations exceeded the combined HAL of 70 ppt in effect at the time
for PFOS and PFOA concentrations in seven of the domestic wells located southwest of Blades.
PFOS was the main contaminant detected with concentrations up to 350 ppt.
Subsequently during 2018, DNREC provided drinking water filters to all residents with domestic
wells impacted with PFOA/PFOS concentrations above 52.5 ppt (75% of the HAL in effect in
2018). DNREC provided the filters to eight residences and has continued to provide
replacement filters as needed.
On September 3, 2020, EPA added the Site to the NPL based on the conclusions of the 2018 SI
that identified chromium, copper, nickel, zinc, and cyanide above EPA health-based screening
levels and/or MCLs in groundwater and soil. Additionally, PFAS, specifically PFOA and PFOS,
were detected above EPA's 2016 HAL in groundwater.
Remedial Investigation/Removal Action
After listing on the NPL, EPA began Rl activities to define the nature and extent of
contamination. EPA conducted routine sampling of the public water supply to ensure the
treated water continued to meet federal and state drinking water standards.2 Additionally, EPA
contacted 97 households through mailings and door-to-door visits, requesting permission to
sample residents' domestic well water for a full suite of analysis, including PFAS compounds.
A total of 55 residents agreed to sampling which included residences that were previously
sampled and residences that had not been previously sampled during the 2018 residential
sampling event. Samples were collected from outdoor spigots or indoor taps in the event
outdoor spigots were not available. Figure 3 depicts the approximate boundaries of the
residential sampling effort. Based upon results, several constituents exceeded tapwater
Regional Screening Levels (RSLs). Notably, hexavalent chromium, cobalt, lead, and PFOS
exceeded either the MCL pursuant to the Safe Drinking Water Act, or the Removal
Management Level (RML). RMLs are used to support the decision for EPA to undertake a
2 As of December 2023, the Town of Blades will be responsible for conducting routine public water supply
sampling.
7
-------
removal action under CERCLA. Based on the RML and MCL exceedances, EPA conducted a
removal action at 12 residences whose owners granted access. EPA issued a removal action
memorandum in March 2022 to address the hexavalent chromium, cobalt, and lead that was
found to exceed action levels in well water of nine households. An addendum to EPA's removal
action memorandum was issued in August 2022 to add additional residences where lead
exceeded the MCL and cobalt exceeded the RML (two additional households) after resampling
had occurred, and additionally to address PFOS after EPA's RMLs were updated to be more
stringent3 (two additional households). At these locations, there were residential wells where
more than one contaminant was found to be above its respective RML or MCL at a given
location. The removal action was conducted to address exceedances for multiple contaminants
when present.
At these 12 residences, either Point-of-Entry Treatment Systems (POETS) / Point-of-Use
Treatment Systems (POUTS) were installed based on space availability and access to plumbing.
POETS were installed in residences where there was enough space to accommodate the system
(e.g., garage, basement, or closet) and the system could be connected to the well plumbing that
would route to the entire household. POUTS were installed at locations where POETS were not
feasible. EPA installed POUTS in bathroom and kitchen sinks, where a resident is most likely to
ingest water. A total of 2 POETS were installed at 2 residences, and a total of 21 POUTS were
installed at 10 residences.
In 2021, Delaware passed House Bill 8, which required DNREC and DPH to work cooperatively to
issue MCLs for PFOA and PFOS. In anticipation, DPH issued an Implementation Plan proposing
MCLs for PFOA at 21 ppt, 14 ppt for PFOS and 17 ppt for the sum of both PFOS and PFOA. 4
DNREC currently provides filters as a preventive measure to residences (where the resident
allows such assistance) where domestic well concentrations are equal to or greater than 4 ppt
PFOA or PFOS.
Due to the contamination found in domestic well water, EPA created OU2 for an interim action
to provide a consistent source of treated or alternative water to residences whose well water is
impacted or likely to become impacted. EPA is continuing the Site-wide Rl under OU1 to define
the nature and extent of contamination (and to identify any other potential source areas) and
will subsequently propose and select a final remedial action to address Site-wide
contamination. The area subject to this interim action is outside of the Town of Blades, to the
south and southwest, bounded by Morgan Branch and the Nanticoke River.
In August of 2022, EPA finalized the Rl Report, including the Human Health Risk Assessment
(HHRA), for OU2 to summarize the residential sampling effort and to calculate unacceptable risk
posed by contaminant levels from the results. Additional information on the HHRA can be
3 The RML for hexavalent chromium is 3.5 parts per billion (ppb); the RML for cobalt is 18 ppb; the MCL for lead is
15 ppb; the RML for PFOS is 120 ppt.
4 This link provides the Delaware Division of Public Health's PFOA and PFOS MCL Implementation Plan that DNREC
uses as a proactive measure to provide water filters to residences.
https://www.dhss.delaware.gov/dhss/dph/hsp/files/MCLimplementationPlanPFAS.pdf.
8
-------
found under the Summary of Site Risks section of this ROD and Appendix C of the August 2022
Rl Report for Operable Unit 2. Because the HHRA indicated that contaminants in well water
posed an unacceptable risk to some residents, EPA identified and evaluated various remedial
alternatives to address this risk in a February 2023 Feasibility Study (FS). The remedial
alternatives presented in the FS were evaluated by EPA and a Preferred Alternative was
proposed for public comment in the Proposed Remedial Action Plan (Proposed Plan) in June
2023.
III. HIGHLIGHTS OF COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
Pursuant to Section 113(k)(2)(B) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 113(k)(2)(B), the Rl and FS reports, the
Proposed Plan, and other documents relating to OU2 were released to the public for comment
on June 29, 2023. These documents were made available to the public online at
https://semspub.epa.gov/src/collection/03/AR67374. in the EPA Administrative Records Room
at EPA's Region 3 office in Philadelphia, and in the Seaford District Library in Seaford, Delaware.
The notice of availability of these documents was published in the Seaford Star and a fact sheet
detailing the Proposed Plan was mailed to local citizens on June 29, 2023.
A public comment period was held from June 29, 2023, until July 28, 2023. EPA held a public
meeting on July 20, 2023, at the Blades Fire Company, located at 200 E. 5th Street, Blades,
Delaware 19973. During the public meeting, EPA gave a formal presentation on EPA's Proposed
Plan, followed by a "Question and Answer" session where representatives from EPA answered
questions regarding the Site and the Proposed Plan. All significant comments related to OU2 are
provided in the Responsiveness Summary. No written comments were received on the
Proposed Plan. All comments provided in the Responsiveness Summary are from the July 20,
2023, public meeting. A transcript of the public meeting is available in the Administrative
Record.
IV. SCOPE OF THE SELECTED REMEDY
During the Rl, contaminants commonly related to plating operations including metals (cobalt,
lead, and hexavalent chromium) and PFAS have been detected in residential drinking water
downgradient of the Site. A removal action was conducted in an expedited manner by EPA to
address the immediate risk posed by the contamination. The OU2 interim remedial action set
forth in this ROD provides a permanent remedy to prevent the exposure to current and future
residents to groundwater containing unacceptable levels of Site-related COCs.
This OU2 interim remedial action will be consistent with the final remedial action for the
restoration of groundwater to beneficial use at the Site (OU1). The final remedial action will be
the subject of a future proposed plan and ROD following completion of the OU1 RI/FS, which
addresses all contaminated media at the Site.
9
-------
V. SITE CHARACTERISTICS
A. Physical Setting
The Town of Blades is located along the southern bank of the Nanticoke River, a tributary of the
Chesapeake Bay, and north of Morgan Branch, which flows west to converge with the
Nanticoke River, as seen on Figure 1. The Site is located in the Coastal Plain Physiographic
Province, which consists of a seaward-dipping wedge of unconsolidated and semi-consolidated
sediments.
B. Geology
Overburden Composition
In general, the Site is underlain by the Nanticoke River Group deposits, which consist of the
Turtle Branch and Kent Isle formations and are related to rise and high stand of sea level; the
formation can consist of beach, tidal flat, open estuary, marsh, swamp, and fluvial deposits.
These deposits underlie terraces that flank the margins of the present Nanticoke River and its
tributaries.
Hydrogeology
The surficial aquifer (Columbia aquifer) extends over a large part of the Delmarva Peninsula.
The aquifer consists of unconsolidated sand and gravel and includes the Nanticoke River Group
deposits where present. The aquifer contains water predominantly in the unconfined
conditions of the sand and gravel beds, but clay beds can create locally semi-confined
conditions. Within the vicinity of Blades, the fine-grained beds of the Manokin Formation are at
the base of the Columbia aquifer. Therefore, the aquifer acts as both an unconfined and semi-
confined aquifer with a saturated thickness ranging from 30 to 100 feet.
The deep aquifer (Choptank aquifer) consists of multiple fining-upward sequences of fine to
coarse sand and shelly and gravelly sand, that grade into sandy clayey shelly silt and is isolated
from the contaminant plume by sub-surface confining units, notably the St. Mary's formation.
Groundwater is encountered at shallow depths, between 9 and 12 feet below ground surface
(bgs). Groundwater flow across the Site has both horizontal and vertical flow components.
Groundwater in the Columbia aquifer exists under the water table (unconfined) conditions.
Based on groundwater elevations collected during the 2018 SI, it was inferred that groundwater
flow at the Procino facility was generally north to south, towards Morgan Branch. However, a
complete description of the horizontal and vertical groundwater flow characteristics and the
10
-------
influence of pumping on groundwater and surface water will continue to be defined as part of
theOUl Rl.
C. Nature and Extent of Contamination
Past investigations and assessments have identified the presence of organic, inorganic, and
PFAS-containing materials that were stored and used at the former Peninsula and Procino
Plating facilities. Therefore, these properties are probable source areas for metals and PFAS
found in environmental media. These contaminants have been identified in drinking water
samples from residential wells close to the Site and downgradient from these facilities. During
the continued OU1 Rl, other potential source areas will be investigated, and the nature and
extent of contamination will be more fully defined.
The most significant pathway for contaminant migration is from uncontrolled releases at
historical and current source areas that infiltrate the soil column and migrate downward into
groundwater. Once in the groundwater, contaminants migrate via horizontal and vertical
pathways through the saturated zone of the Columbia aquifer. The operation of municipal and
domestic wells may draw contaminants to well intakes. Surface water bodies (Nanticoke River
and Morgan Branch) also likely influence the local flow of groundwater in and around the Site.
To date, public, domestic, and monitoring well samples confirm the presence of PFAS in
groundwater. Furthermore, elevated concentrations of metals, including cobalt, hexavalent
chromium, and lead were detected in domestic wells.
D. National Historical Preservation Act
EPA has initiated National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) consultation with stakeholders
including Delaware State Historic Preservation Office (DESHPO), DNREC, Delaware Nation, and
Delaware Tribe of Indians. These consultation efforts led to the consummation of
"Programmatic Agreement Among the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Delaware
State Historic Preservation Office Regarding Implementation of Interim Remedial Action for
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Operable Unit 2 Blades, Sussex County, DelawareThis
document was made effective on November 6, 2023. This document sets forth procedures to
determine if historical properties are present and, if historical properties are present,
procedures for avoidance or minimization of adverse impacts on historic properties that will be
implemented as part of the interim remedial action for the Site and can be found in the
Administrative Record.
VI. CURRENT AND POTENTIAL FUTURE LAND AND RESOURCE USES
The current and reasonably anticipated future land use in the Town of Blades and surrounding
areas is residential land use, however light commercial and industrial facilities exist in and
11
-------
around the Town of Blades. Groundwater is the sole drinking water source for both public and
domestic potable water in the Town and the surrounding area. It is expected future land and
groundwater uses will remain the same. The land use controls associated with the Selected
Remedy (see selected ICs) will be consistent with current and any future land and groundwater
use.
VII. SUMMARY OF SITE RISKS
During the OU2 Rl, an HHRA was conducted to determine the current and potential future
effects of contaminated drinking water on human health in the absence of any cleanup actions
at the Site. A baseline risk assessment (before any cleanup) provides the basis for taking a
remedial action and indicates the exposure pathway(s) that need to be addressed by the
remedial action. This section summarizes the results of the HHRA at the Site.
For more detailed human health information, please refer to the August 2022 Blades
Groundwater HHRA available in the Administrative Record for the Site. Human health risk
summary tables from the HHRA are included as Appendix C to this ROD.
WHAT IS RISK AND HOW IS IT CALCULATED?
A Superfund human health risk assessment estimates the baseline risk. The baseline risk is an
estimate of the likelihood of health problems occurring if no cleanup action were taken at a site. To
estimate the baseline risk at a Superfund site, EPA undertakes a four-step process:
Step 1: Analyze Contamination
Step 2: Estimate Exposure
Step 3: Assess Potential Health Dangers
Step 4: Characterize Site Risk
In Step 1, EPA looks at the concentrations of contaminants found at a site as well as past scientific
studies on the effects these contaminants have had on people (or animals, when human studies are
unavailable). Comparisons between site-specific concentrations and concentrations reported in past
studies help EPA to determine which contaminants are most likely to pose the greatest threat to
human health.
In Step 2, EPA considers the different ways that people might be exposed to the contaminants
identified in Step 1, the concentrations that people might be exposed to, and the potential frequency
and duration of exposure. Using this information, EPA calculates a "reasonable maximum exposure"
scenario, which portrays the highest level of human exposure that could reasonably be expected to
occur.
In Step 3, EPA uses the information from Step 2 combined with information on the toxicity of each
chemical to assess potential risks. EPA considers two types of risk: cancer and non-cancer risk. The
likelihood of any kind of cancer resulting from a Superfund site is generally expressed as an upper
bound probability; for example, a "1 in 10,000 chance." In other words, for every 10,000 people that
12
-------
could be exposed, one extra instance of cancer may occur as a result of exposure to site
contaminants. An extra cancer case means that one more person could get cancer than would
normally be expected to from all other causes. For non-cancer health effects, EPA calculates a
"hazard index." The key concept here is that a "threshold level" (measured as a HI of equal to or less
than 1) exists below which non-cancer health effects are no longer predicted.
In Step 4, EPA determines whether site risks are great enough to cause health problems for people at
or near the Superfund site. The results of the three previous steps are combined, evaluated, and
summarized. EPA adds up the potential risks from the individual contaminants and exposure
pathways and calculates a total site risk. Generally, cancer risks between 10"4 and 10 s, and a non-
cancer HI of 1 or less are considered acceptable for EPA Superfund sites.
A. Human Health Risk Assessment Summary
The HHRA was conducted for 13 residential locations where groundwater concentrations
exceeded EPA and/or DNREC action levels to characterize and quantify the current and
potential future human health risks that would occur if no remedial action were taken to
address contaminated drinking water at the Site. The HHRA identifies the potential exposure
pathways in which people may be exposed to Site contaminants, the toxicity of the
contaminants present, and the potential for carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic effects to occur
from exposure to the contaminants.
Identification of Contaminants of Concern
The selection of contaminants of potential concern (COPCs) is a risk-based screening step to
identify chemicals that should be included in the quantitative risk assessment. The selection of
COPCs was based on information regarding chemical substances found at the Site including
chemical-specific concentrations, occurrence, distribution, and toxicity. COPCs include only
those chemicals with positive detections and are limited to those chemicals that exceed the
selection criterion. Screening levels based on residential exposure assumptions were used for
this HHRA as a health-protective screening tool to be protective of all potential current and
future Site uses. The COCs identified in the HHRA include cobalt, hexavalent chromium, lead,
PFOA, and PFOS.
Risk assessments are conducted using an exposure point concentration (EPC) for each COPC.
The EPC represents an estimated concentration to which a receptor is assumed to be
continuously exposed while in contact with an environmental medium. Consistent with EPA's
Supplemental Guidance to RAGS: Calculating the Concentration Term, a conservative estimate
of the mean concentration is used as the EPC. The EPC is generally defined as the 95 percent
upper confidence limit (UCL) on the mean and is calculated using EPA's ProUCL 5.1 software.
EPCs used in the risk assessment are presented in Appendix C.
13
-------
Exposure Assessment
The exposure assessment portion of the risk assessment defines and evaluates the type and
magnitude of human exposure to the chemicals present at or migrating from a site. Based on
current and potential future land use at the site, residents (child/adult) were identified as
potential receptors. Groundwater within the study area is used as a drinking water source and
several surveys have been conducted to identify residential wells within the study area that
may be impacted by the groundwater contaminant plume.
Exposure to lead was assessed using the following models:
• The latest version of EPA's Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic (IEUBK) Model for
lead (version 2). This model is typically used to evaluate lead exposure assuming a
residential land use scenario.
• EPA's Adult Lead Methodology (2003b and 2017). This methodology is typically used to
evaluate lead exposure assuming a non-residential land use scenario.
The IEUBK Model for lead is designed to estimate blood levels of lead in children (under 7 years
of age) based on either default or site-specific input values for air, drinking water, diet, dust,
and soil exposure. Studies indicate that infants and young children are extremely susceptible to
adverse effects from exposure to lead. Considerable behavioral and developmental
impairments have been noted in children with elevated blood-lead levels. Historically blood-
lead levels greater than 10 micrograms per deciliter (|ag/dL) were considered to be a "concern."
Current scientific literature on lead toxicity indicates that adverse health effects are associated
with blood-lead (PbB) levels below the long-held target of 10 |ag/dL. Specifically, evidence exists
of clear cognitive declines in young children with PbB levels between 2 and 8 |ag/dL (as
referenced in the December 2016 EPA Office of Land and Emergency Management [OLEM]
Memo). Therefore, a value of 5 |ag/dL was used as the acceptable blood lead level in this HHRA.
The exposure factors used to estimate intake for residents (child/adult) are presented and
defined in Appendix C.
Toxicity Assessment
The toxicity assessment for the COPCs examines information concerning the potential human
health effects of exposure to COPCs. The goal of the toxicity assessment is to provide, for each
COPC, a quantitative estimate of the relationship between the magnitude and type of exposure
and the severity or probability of human health effects.
The toxicity values applied in the HHRA can be found in Appendix C.
14
-------
Risk Characterization
EPA has set a target risk range of 10~4 to 10~6 for a lifetime excess carcinogenic risk. An excess
lifetime cancer risk means the acceptable risk to an individual of developing cancer from
exposure over a lifetime to carcinogens at a site is between 10,000 to 1 (10~4) and 1,000,000 to
1 (10~6). For non-carcinogenic contaminants, EPA sets a target Hazard Index (HI) of no greater
than 1. The hazard quotient (HQ) measures the risk posed by each exposure pathway (i.e.,
inhalation, ingestion, and dermal contact) for a single non-carcinogenic contaminant at a site,
while the HI is the sum of all of the HQ values for the respective receptor (e.g., child or adult
resident).
The COCs identified in the HHRA include cobalt, hexavalent chromium, lead, PFOA, and PFOS.
Of the 13 select locations, the HHRA determined that there is unacceptable risk, exceedance of
regulatory thresholds (carcinogenic risk 1E-4, non-carcinogenic HI of 1), from drinking water to
child and adult receptors, as summarized in Table 1 below.
Table 1: Risk Findings
Risk Findings
Number of Locations
Highest Threshold
Exceedances
No unacceptable risk
None
--
Cobalt in drinking water-
unacceptable risk to child and
adult receptors
9 locations
Non-carcinogenic HI of 5
Lead in drinking water -
unacceptable risk to child
receptor
3 locations
Greater than 5% of children
exposed exceed a blood lead
level of 5 |ag/dL
PFOA and PFOS in drinking
water - unacceptable risk to
child and adult receptors
4 locations child and adult
3 locations child only
Non-carcinogenic HI of 6
Hexavalent Chromium in
drinking water - risk to the
lifetime receptor
1 location
Carcinogenic risk of 2E-04
A summary of the carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks are presented in Appendix C.
15
-------
Risk from Lead
Residential exposures to lead in soil and groundwater were evaluated using EPA's Integrated
Exposure Uptake Biokinetic (IEUBK) lead model. The results of the IEUBK model indicate that
risks for current child residents exposed to lead in surface soil do not exceed the EPA goal of no
more than 5% of children exceeding a 5 microgram per deciliter (|ag/dL) blood-lead level.
However, the IEUBK model also indicates that risks to future child residents exposed to lead in
both groundwater and surface/subsurface soil exceed the EPA goal; lead in groundwater was
responsible for the exceedance of the benchmark for residential exposures to lead.
B. Summary of Ecological Risk Assessment
A Screening Level Ecological Risk Assessment (SLERA) was not conducted as part of the OU2 Rl
activities because OU2 specifically addresses the contamination found in residential drinking
water. Ecological risk will be assessed for the Site in a future Rl and ROD for OU1.
C. Summary of Site Risks
In summary, the HHRA for the Site demonstrates the presence of unacceptable risk to human
health, and that remedial actions are necessary to reduce the risks to within or below EPA's
acceptable risk range. EPA has identified the COCs that pose the greatest potential
unacceptable risk to human health and the environment at the Site. Therefore, EPA has
determined that the Selected Remedy for this Interim ROD is necessary to protect public health
or welfare or the environment from actual or threatened releases of hazardous substances into
the environment.
VIII. REMEDIAL ACTION OBJECTIVES
Remedial Action Objectives (RAOs) are specific goals developed to address the Site COCs and
exposure pathways to protect human health and the environment. These objectives are based
on available information and standards, such as applicable or relevant and appropriate
requirements (ARARs), to-be-considered (TBC) guidance, and Site-specific risk-based levels.
The RAO established for this interim remedial action is to:
• Prevent current and future residential exposure to groundwater containing
unacceptable levels of Site-related COCs.
EPA guidance states that "an interim action is limited in scope and only addresses areas/media
that also will be addressed by a final site/operable unit ROD. Reasons for taking an interim
action could include to:
• Take quick action to protect human health and the environment from an imminent
threat in the short term, while a final remedial solution is being developed; or
16
-------
• Institute temporary measures to stabilize the Site or operable unit and/or prevent
further migration of contaminants or further environmental degradation."5
This RAO is designed to support a final remedial action which will comply with CERCLA
requirements to clean up contaminants in groundwater and restore the groundwater to
beneficial use. Therefore, the RAO reflects the limited scope of an interim action. By preventing
human exposure to contaminated groundwater, the interim action will reduce Site risks by
ensuring the public is not exposed or potentially exposed to contaminants in groundwater prior
to the restoration of groundwater.
IX. SUMMARY OF REMEDIAL ACTION ALTERNATIVES
The Superfund law (CERCLA) requires that any remedy selected to address contamination at a
site must be protective of human health and the environment, cost-effective, in compliance
with promulgated standards or requirements that are determined to be ARARs, and consistent
with the NCP. The five Remedial Alternatives, as shown in Table 2, were evaluated to meet the
RAO for this interim remedial action.
Table 2: Remedial Alternatives Evaluated
Alternative
Description
1
No Action
2
Bottled Water
3
Point-of-entry Treatment Systems (POETS) / Point-of-use Treatment Systems
(POUTS)
4
Install Deeper Drinking Water Wells
5
Connection to Public Water Line and Institutional Controls (ICs)
Alternative 1: No Action
Consideration of this alternative is required by the NCP at 40 C.F.R. § 300.430(e)(6). Under
Alternative 1, no additional remedial action would be taken at the Site. The "no action"
alternative serves as a basis against which each of the other proposed remedial alternatives can
be compared. Under this alternative, the Site would remain in its present condition. Current
and future residents would remain exposed to Site-related contaminants in residential drinking
water wells. Under this alternative, the existing POETS and POUTS that have been provided by
EPA's removal program would no longer be maintained by EPA or DNREC and would be
properly removed.
Alternative 2: Bottled Water
Under this alternative, bottled water would be delivered to all impacted or potentially impacted
residences on a reoccurring basis and EPA would fund the delivery costs. This alternative would
5 A Guide to Preparing Superfund Proposed Plans, Records of Decision, and Other Remedy Selection Decision
Documents" (Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response) (July 1999), at p. 8-2.
17
-------
be in effect until a future groundwater remediation project achieves cleanup goals and supplied
water is no longer necessary. Typically, a duration of up to 30 years is assumed for groundwater
remedies for the purposes of cost calculation.
Under this alternative, an initial bottle supply system/dispenser would be put in place in each
residence with large volume (e.g., 5-gallon) bottles. Reoccurring deliveries would provide water
as needed for each impacted or potentially impacted residence. Existing private wells would
remain in place for non-ingestion uses (e.g., bathing and irrigation) and monitored to evaluate
any changes in groundwater conditions.
Under this alternative, the existing POETS and POUTS that are provided by the EPA removal
program would be maintained by EPA until implementation of the alternative, at which point,
EPA would no longer maintain the systems.
Alternative 3: Point-of-entry Treatment Systems (POETS) / Point-of-use Treatment Systems
(POUTS)
Under this alternative, POETS/ POUTS would be installed at all impacted or potentially impacted
residences, and EPA would fund the cost of installation of the system. POETS are installed to
filter and treat all water entering the household. POUTS treat only the water intended for direct
consumption (drinking and cooking) and are typically installed at a single tap or limited number
of taps. This alternative would be in effect until a future groundwater remediation project
achieves cleanup goals and the treatment systems are no longer necessary. Typically, a
duration of up to 30 years is assumed for groundwater remedies for the purposes of cost
calculation.
Each residence would be evaluated for which type of treatment system would be most
appropriate, with the preferred option being POET which treats all water entering the home.
POETS/POUTS have already been installed at some residences, but they may not include all
processes necessary to remove all COCs. Residences where systems do not meet the
requirements to remove all COCs, to achieve the RAO, would require system upgrades.
Currently installed systems depended on the amount of space available (wall space/closet
space/garage/basement for POET, or POUT installed on bathroom and kitchen faucets when
space does not allow for POET). Filter/media replacement (various timing depending on the
filter/media) are required for both types of systems.
Monitoring of treated water would be performed to evaluate remedy protectiveness/success
and is assumed to be performed annually for 30 years; however, the frequency and duration of
monitoring could differ if this alternative were selected as the interim remedy.
Alternative 4: Install Deeper Water Wells
Under this alternative, new wells targeting groundwater below the contaminant plume would
be installed by EPA at each impacted or potentially impacted residence. The wells would be
18
-------
approximately 250 to 300 feet deep and screened in the Choptank aquifer, which is isolated
from the contaminant plume by the sub-surface confining geologic unit in the St. Mary's
formation.
Prior to installing individual private wells in the deeper aquifer, a pump test and sampling
would be performed to confirm that the aquifer could produce the necessary amount of water
and it is unimpacted by contaminants from the Site.
Each residence would have a new well installed and the existing wells would be abandoned. If
needed for residences near wetland resource areas, erosion control measures (i.e., silt fences)
would be installed prior to well installation. Evaluation of the best placement (both location and
depth) would be determined during pre-design and design efforts.
Monitoring of well water would be performed to evaluate remedy protectiveness and is
assumed to be performed annually for 30 years; however, the frequency and duration of
monitoring could differ if this alternative were selected as the interim remedy.
Under this alternative, the existing POETS and POUTS that are provided by the EPA removal
program would be maintained by EPA until implementation of the alternative, at which point,
EPA would no longer maintain the systems.
Alternative 5: Connection to Public Water Line and ICs
This alternative involves extending a public water line into the impacted area and connecting
impacted or potentially impacted residences to the public water line distribution system. Under
Alternative 5, upgrades or expansions to the public water system maintained by the Town of
Blades would be determined during the design phase in consultation with the state and the
town.
Capital costs would be funded by EPA, with monthly water use being paid by residents. This
alternative requires the agreement of affected residents to connect to the Blades' public water
system. Residents who elect to be connected would have their existing drinking wells
completely disconnected from the house water system and either abandoned by EPA or
converted to non-potable use if the intended use does not pose unacceptable risk. Residents
who elect not to be connected would continue to use their private drinking wells and all
associated costs to make a future connection the public water supply would be at the
homeowner's expense.
Under this alternative, the existing POETS and POUTS that have been provided by the EPA
removal program would be maintained by EPA until implementation of the alternative, at which
time EPA would no longer maintain the systems.
This alternative would eliminate exposure to contaminated groundwater by providing an
alternate water supply and implementing institutional controls (ICs) such as local ordinances
19
-------
and/or groundwater management zones to prevent the installation of new potable wells and
proper abandonment/capping of existing wells.
X. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES
A. Criteria Used to Compare Cleanup Alternatives
The remedial alternatives have been evaluated against the nine decision criteria set forth in the
NCP, 40 C.F.R. § 300.430(e)(9)(iii) and listed in Table 3 below. These nine criteria are organized
into three categories: threshold criteria, primary balancing criteria, and modifying criteria.
Threshold criteria must be satisfied in order for an alternative to be eligible for selection.
Primary balancing criteria are used to weigh major trade-offs among alternatives. Modifying
criteria are formally taken into account after public comment has been received on the
Proposed Plan.
In the remedial decision-making process, EPA describes the relative performance of each
alternative against the evaluation criteria and notes how each alternative compares to the
other alternatives under consideration. A detailed analysis of alternatives can be found in the
FS, which is in the Administrative Record file for the Site.
Table 3: Evaluation Criteria for Superfund Remedial Alternatives
Threshold
Criteria
1. Overall Protection of Human Health and the Environment determines whether
an alternative can adequately protect human health and the environment by
eliminating, reducing, or controlling exposures to hazardous substances,
pollutants or contaminants to levels that do not pose an unacceptable risk.
2. Compliance with ARARs evaluates whether an alternative meets Federal and
more stringent State environmental laws or facility siting laws, or whether a waiver
is justified.
Primary Balancing Criteria
3. Long-term Effectiveness and Permanence considers the ability of an alternative
to maintain protection of human health and the environment over time.
4. Reduction of Toxicity, Mobility, or Volume of Contaminants through
Treatment evaluates an alternative's use of treatment to reduce the harmful
effects of principal contaminants, their ability to move in the environment, and
the amount of contamination present.
5. Short-term Effectiveness considers the length of time needed to implement an
alternative and the risks the alternative poses to workers, residents, and the
environment during implementation.
6. Implementability considers the technical and administrative feasibility of
implementing an alternative, including factors such as the relative availability of
goods and services.
7. Cost includes the estimated capital and annual operation and maintenance
costs, as well as present worth cost of an alternative. Present worth cost is the
total cost of an alternative over time in today's dollar value. Cost estimates are
expected to be accurate within a range of +50 to -30 percent.
20
-------
O)
¦S
^ fi
¦5
o ft
8. State/ Support Agency Acceptance considers whether the State agrees with
EPA's analyses and recommendations, as described in the Feasibility Study and
Proposed Plan.
9. Community Acceptance considers whether the local community agrees with
EPA's analyses and preferred alternative. Comments received on the Proposed
Plan are an important indicator of community acceptance.
B. Detailed Analysis of Proposed Remedial Alternatives
1. Overall Protection of Human Health and the Environment
Alternative 1 (No Action) does not provide adequate protection of human health and the
environment because it does not eliminate or control the current and future risks from
exposure to contaminated groundwater. The No Action alternative will not be discussed further
in the nine criteria analysis because it does not satisfy the threshold criterion of providing
overall protection to human health.
Alternative 2 (Bottled Drinking Water) is effective in reducing risks related to ingestion of
contaminated groundwater. As contaminated groundwater would still enter residences, the
reliability of the alternative depends on residents being diligent in drinking only the bottled
water. Assuming the resident complies with use of bottled water, this alternative would be
protective to human health because exposure via ingestion of contaminated groundwater
would be eliminated.
Alternative 3 (POETS/POUTS) is effective in reducing risks related to ingestion of contaminated
groundwater. While exposure pathways related to contaminated groundwater may still exist in
a residence, depending on the type of system (POET vs. POUT), proper usage and maintenance
would reduce ingestion risks. Similar to Alternative 2, assuming that the resident complies with
use of POETS/POUTS, this alternative is considered protective of human health.
Alternative 4 (Installing Deeper Drinking Water Wells) involves replacing existing residential
wells with wells screened in a deeper aquifer not hydraulically connected to the impacted
Columbia aquifer. Assuming the deeper aquifer is free from contaminants, this alternative is
considered protective of human health.
Alternative 5 (Connection to Public Water Line and ICs) would protect human health by
eliminating the need to use contaminated groundwater from private drinking water wells in the
impacted areas. Alternative 5 would provide a permanent, treated and monitored water supply
to the residences through connection to a public water system. Additionally, ICs would prevent
the installation of new potable wells until groundwater is restored to its designated beneficial
use.
21
-------
2. Compliance with ARARs
Section 121(d) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9621(d), and the NCP at 40 C.F.R. § 300.430(f)(l)(ii)(B),
require that remedial actions at CERCLA sites at least attain legally applicable or relevant and
appropriate Federal and State requirements, standards of control, and other substantive
environmental protection requirements, criteria, or limitations promulgated under Federal or
State law, which are collectively referred to as "ARARs," unless such ARARs are waived under
Section 121(d)(4) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9621(d)(4), and the NCP at 40 C.F.R. §
300.430(f)(l)(ii)(C).
"Applicable" requirements are those cleanup standards, standards of control, and other
substantive requirements, criteria, or limitations promulgated under Federal environmental or
State environmental or facility-siting laws that specifically address a hazardous substance,
pollutant, contaminant, remedial action, location, or other circumstance at a CERCLA site. Only
those State standards that are identified by a State in a timely manner and that are more
stringent than Federal requirements may be applicable.
"Relevant and appropriate" requirements are those cleanup standards, standards of control,
and other substantive requirements, criteria, or limitations promulgated under Federal
environmental or State environmental or facility-siting laws that, while not "applicable" to a
hazardous substance, pollutant, contaminant, remedial action, location, or other circumstance
at a CERCLA site, address problems or situations sufficiently similar to those encountered at the
CERCLA site that their use is well-suited to the particular site. Only those State standards that
are identified by a State in a timely manner and that are more stringent than Federal
requirements may be relevant and appropriate.
EPA also considers to-be-considered materials (TBCs), along with ARARs. TBCs are non-
promulgated criteria, advisories, or guidance, issued by Federal or State government that are
not legally binding and do not have the status of potential ARARs. However, TBCs may be
considered during development of remedial alternatives. EPA may use TBCs in determining the
necessary level of cleanup for protection of human health or the environment when ARARs do
not exist for particular contaminants.
ARARs for remedial action alternatives can be classified into one of the following three
functional groups:
• Chemical-Specific: Health-risk-based numerical values or methodologies that establish
concentration or discharge limits for particular contaminants. Often, these ARARs are used
to determine the extent of site remediation. In general, chemical-specific requirements are
set for a single chemical or a closely related group of chemicals. Examples include MCLs,
promulgated under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). Potential Federal and more
stringent State chemical-specific ARARs and TBCs for the Preferred Alternative are identified
in Appendix B.
22
-------
• Location-Specific: Requirements that restrict remedial actions based on the characteristics
of the Site or its immediate environment. Examples of these areas regulated under various
Federal laws include floodplains, and wetlands. Federal and more stringent State location-
specific ARARs and TBCs identified for the Preferred Alternative are presented in Appendix
B.
• Action-Specific: Requirements that set controls or restrictions on the design,
implementation, and performance levels (including discharge limits) of activities related to
the management of hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants. These action-
specific requirements do not in themselves determine the remedial alternative; rather, they
indicate how a selected alternative must be achieved. Federal and more stringent State
action-specific ARARs and TBCs for the Preferred Alternative are identified in Appendix B.
The major ARARs for this interim action include:
• National Primary Drinking Water Standards: 40 C.F.R. §§ 141.50, 141.61 and 141.62
establish health-based standards (i.e., Maximum Contaminant Level Goals (MCLGs) and
MCLs) for public drinking water.
• Delaware Regulations Governing the Construction and Use of Wells: 7 Del. Admin. C.
§ 7301 contains requirements governing the location, design, installation, use,
modification, repair, and sealing of all wells and associated equipment as well as
requirements for public and private potable wells.
All alternatives analyzed in this remedial decision-making process would meet their respective
ARARs for Federal and State laws. Achievement of chemical-specific ARARs in groundwater
within the aquifer will be addressed in a future decision document that addresses the
restoration of groundwater.
3. Long-Term Effectiveness and Permanence
Alternative 2 (Bottled Water) does not permanently eliminate the exposure pathway to
contaminated groundwater. There will be some residual risk since contaminated groundwater
would still enter residences. The reliability of this alternative depends on residents being
diligent in using bottled water for ingestion purposes. Alternative 2 would require extensive
coordination and scheduling for routine water deliveries/drop-offs for each residence.
Similar to Alternative 2, the long-term effectiveness of Alternative 3 (POETS/POUTS) depends
on the residents being diligent in using treated water for ingestion purposes and the installed
POETS/POUTS functioning properly. During previous removal actions at the Site, the POETS had
difficulty functioning as intended. This was the result of by-pass valves unintentionally being
turned on, or treatment solutions not properly reducing contaminants to acceptable levels.
Therefore, Alternative 3 requires continuous maintenance and oversight to ensure the technical
components of POETS/POUTS are functioning properly at each residence.
23
-------
Alternative 4 (Installing Deeper Drinking Water Wells) would be more reliable than Alternatives
2 and 3 at eliminating the risk to residents exposed to contaminated groundwater by
eliminating the reliance on the resident's diligence and filter monitoring and maintenance.
However, long-term effectiveness could be impacted by the potential of contaminating the
deeper aquifer by drilling a large number of well points through the confining layers of the
shallow aquifer. Long-term monitoring would also be needed to ensure that Site-related
contaminants don't migrate to the deeper aquifer over time. Additionally, Alternative 4 is
reliant on the deeper aquifer's ability to produce the necessary amount of water for all
residences.
Alternative 5 (Connection to Public Water Line and ICs) would be the most effective long-
term remedy because it would permanently eliminate the exposure pathway and provide
residents with a treated and monitored water supply through the connection to a public
water system. The Town of Blade's current water system is being effectively treated and
sampled on a reoccurring basis which demonstrates long-term effectiveness. Additionally,
ICs would prevent the installation of new potable wells until groundwater is restored to its
designated beneficial use. Alternatives 2, 3, and 4 are individual systems at a large number
of residences that would require more rigorous monitoring, maintenance, oversight, and
coordination than a single public water system. A single public water system poses the
least amount of residual risk.
4. Reduction of Toxicity. Mobility, or Volume throughTreatment
None of the alternatives evaluated reduce toxicity, mobility, or volume through treatment
processes.
Groundwater restoration will be addressed in a future OU1 proposed plan and decision
document.
5. Short-Term Effectiveness
Alternative 2 (Bottled Drinking Water) has no short-term risks to the workers providing bottled
water but does have minor short-term risks for the community related to delivery trucks on
local roads and with handling of the bottled water. The RAO would be achieved once bottled
water is supplied to each residence (approximately 1 month following design approval).
Alternative 3 (POETS/POUTS) has minor short-term risks to workers, specifically, if workers
were to come into contact with contaminated groundwater during system installation. This risk
would be mitigated through use of personal protective equipment (PPE). The RAO would be
achieved upon installation of the treatment systems (approximately 6 months following design
approval).
Alternative 4 (Installing Deeper Drinking Water Wells) would have short-term risks for the
community related to well drillers and contractors driving in the neighborhoods. Similar to
Alternative 3, drillers and contractors would mitigate minor short-term risks related to
24
-------
contaminated groundwater contact through use of PPE and would conduct work in accordance
with Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requirements and implementation
of safe work practices. The RAO would be achieved upon installation of the new private wells
(approximately 6 months following design approval). Alternative 5 (Connection to Public Water
Line and ICs) would have a moderate but temporary disturbance on the local community during
water line (and any needed facilities) installation/construction. Construction workers would
conduct work in accordance with OSHA requirements and implementations of safe work
practices. The RAO would be achieved upon connection to the alternate water supply
(approximately 1 year following design approval).
Alternatives 2, 3, and 4 have similar short-term impacts on workers and community members.
Alternative 5 poses more risk to workers than the other alternatives; however, construction
necessary to connect residences to public water would be conducted in accordance with well-
established worker protection procedures.
6. Implementability
Alternatives 2 (Bottled Drinking Water) and 3 (POETS/POUTS) are easily implementable. The
resources required for implementation are readily available. However, the reliability of
Alternative 2 is based on the residences not using untreated groundwater as a drinking water
source. Alternative 3 also requires continuous maintenance and oversight to ensure the
POETS/POUTS are functioning correctly. There may be times when individual POETS/POUTS are
not functioning properly, which could lead to limited short-term exposure, and would require
diligent maintenance and oversight. Therefore, in terms of technology operation and reliability,
Alternative 3 may not be considered reliable.
Alternative 4 (Installing Deeper Drinking Water Wells) is more difficult to implement than
Alternatives 2 and 3, as it involves installing deep wells at a large number of residences, under
the assumption that the aquifer can adequately provide water to each residence. Test wells
would be needed to confirm the water supply is adequate, and free from contaminants. The
resources required for implementation of this alternative are readily available. Coordination
with local property owners, as well as local and state agencies would be required to locate and
develop a new water supply beneath all impacted residences.
Alternative 5 (Connection to Public Water Line and ICs) includes the most significant amount of
construction for installing water lines and potential new facilities but includes commonly used
technologies and engineering services. The resources required for implementation of this
alternative are readily available. Coordination with local property owners, railroad owners, and
local and state agencies would be required to install new water supply lines/connections to all
affected residences. Coordination with local property owners, as well as local and state
agencies would be required to determine implementation steps that may include temporary
roadway closures and detours.
25
-------
Alternative 5 would require more initial construction activities than the other alternatives,
however, the other alternatives would require more frequent maintenance and monitoring at a
large number of residences for as long as is required to remediate the groundwater (presumed
to be 30 years for cost estimation) or indefinitely.
7. Cost
Cost information for alternatives 2,3,4, and 5 over a presumed 30-year period is presented
below. These preliminary cost estimates are anticipated to be within -30 percent to +50 percent
of the actual costs of implementing each alternative. Alternative 2 (Bottled Water) is the least
expensive. Alternatives 3 (POET/POUT) and 5 (Water Line) are similar in cost. Alternative 4
(Deep Wells) has the largest capital cost. See Appendix D for the detailed cost estimate for
Alternative 5 and the Administrative Record for Alternatives 2, 3, and 4.
Table 4: Cost Estimate of Alternatives
Alternative
Description
Capital
O&M
Total
2
Bottled Water
$49,000
$4,094,000
$4,143,000
3
POETS/POUTS
$448,000
$5,753,000
$6,201,000
4
Install Deeper Wells
$7,108,000
$2,465,000
$9,573,000
5
Connection to Public
Water Line and ICs
$5,611,000
$127,000
$5,738,000
8. State Acceptance
EPA and DNREC have consulted closely during preparation of the Proposed Plan and this ROD
for interim action. DNREC concurred with the Selected Remedy in a letter dated January 12,
2024 (Appendix E).
9. Community Acceptance
EPA received a limited number of comments and questions concerning the Preferred
Alternative in the Proposed Plan (Alternative 5). A majority of the comments received from the
local community expressed support for EPA's Preferred Alternative. No written comments were
received on the Proposed Plan. All comments provided in the Responsiveness Summary section
are from the July 20, 2023, public meeting. A transcript of the public meeting is available in the
Administrative Record.
XI. SELECTED REMEDY
The Selected Remedy for OU2 is Alternative 5, Connection to Public Water Line and Institutional
Controls. The Selected Remedy will extend a public water line to properties whose private wells
are currently impacted with Site-related contaminants and to those properties that have the
potential to become impacted. The Selected Remedy requires the agreement of residents to
26
-------
connect to the public water system. Residents who elect to be connected will have their
existing drinking wells completely disconnected from the house water system and either
abandoned by EPA or converted to non-potable use if the intended use does not pose
unacceptable risk at EPA's expense. Once connected, residents would be responsible for the
recurring water bill. Residents who elect not to be connected would continue to use their
private drinking wells and all associated costs to make a future connection to the public water
supply would be at the homeowner's expense.
The area subject to this Selected Remedy are the residences located south and southwest,
outside of the town limits of Blades, bounded by Morgan Branch and the Nanticoke River as
depicted in Figure 2. This area encompasses the wells that have been impacted and based on
EPA's best professional judgement may be impacted in the future.
Existing POETS/POUTS will be maintained until connection to the public water line is
completed, at which time EPA would no longer maintain the systems. Additionally, institutional
controls such as local ordinances and/or groundwater management zones will be put in place to
prevent the installation of new potable wells until the aquifer is restored to beneficial use
under OU1.
EPA expects that a water line connection will likely be made in the River Road area (Figure 4).
Construction of the new water line will likely need to pass underneath the railroad tracks to
extend to the impacted residences. Erosion and dust control measures will be implemented
during the work. Water mains will be installed, and service connections/supply lines will be
installed at each residence. Repair of roadway pavement and driveways/lawns (as needed) will
be performed.
If additional production is needed for the system to maintain the necessary capacity, EPA
expects a new water supply well will be installed with a pump similar to the existing production
wells (providing a yield of 150 gallons per minute [gpm]) and screened in the lower Choptank
aquifer (approximately 300 feet bgs), which is not anticipated to be hydraulically connected to
the impacted Columbia aquifer. The groundwater from the Choptank aquifer will be sampled to
confirm sufficient yield and absence of contamination. If additional treatment is necessary, EPA
expects that a new treatment facility will be constructed with similar treatment processes as
the Town of Blades' current facility or the current facility will be upgraded. The size will be
appropriate for treating the flow from the new production well (150 gpm). If additional storage
is necessary, a storage tank will be constructed to manage the volume of expanded capacity.
A. Summary of the Rationale for the Selected Remedy
The Selected Remedy (Alternative 5) is most protective of human health because extension of
the public water supply will permanently eliminate the potential use of contaminated
groundwater as a drinking water source. Additionally, the Selected Remedy will provide
drinking water that is required to comply with all drinking water standards. The POETS/POUTS
provided under Alternative 3 can fail and result in short-term exposure until maintenance is
27
-------
performed, making the Selected Remedy more effective in the long-term. The Selected
Remedy is also readily implementable with relatively limited short-term impacts and is more
cost-effective compared to Alternative's 3 and 4.
Based on the information available at this time, EPA has concluded that the Selected Remedy
(Alternative 5: Public Water Line and ICs) meets the threshold criteria and provides the best
balance of trade-offs when compared to the other alternatives for OU2 with respect to the
balancing criteria. EPA expects the Selected Remedy to satisfy the following statutory
requirements of CERCLA Section 121(b), 42 U.S.C. § 9621(b): 1) to be protective of human
health and the environment; 2) to comply with ARARs (or justify a waiver); 3) to be cost-
effective; and 4) to utilize permanent solutions and alternative treatment technologies or
resource recovery technologies to the maximum extent practicable. With respect to the fifth
statutory requirement, i.e., to satisfy the preference for treatment as a principal element (or
justify not meeting the preference), the Selected Remedy does not satisfy the preference for
treatment as a principal element. However, it does permanently eliminate or reduce the
exposure pathway to contaminated groundwater via residential wells. The final remedial action
for the Site, which will be proposed in a future proposed plan and decision document for OU1
and subject to public participation requirements, will address the remaining contaminated
media at the Site.
B. Summary of the Estimated Costs
The cost of the Selected Remedy (Alternative 5) is estimated to be $5,738,000, which is less
than the estimated cost of $6,201,000 for Alternative 3 and $9,573,000 for Alternative 4.
Detailed cost information for the Selected Remedy can be found in Appendix D.
C. Performance Standards
Performance standards do not apply to the off-Site treatment, under applicable law, of public
water to be supplied by the Town of Blades to residents via the newly installed water line.
Treatment of the public water will be conducted off-Site by the provider in compliance with all
drinking water standards.
D. Expected Outcome of the Selected Remedy
The Selected Remedy is expected to meet the RAO for this ROD for interim action:
• Prevent current and future residential exposure to groundwater containing
unacceptable levels of Site-related COCs.
XII. STATUTORY DETERMINATIONS
The OU2 Selected Remedy is protective of human health and the environment, complies with
Federal and State requirements that are legally applicable or relevant and appropriate to the
interim remedial action, is cost-effective, and utilizes permanent solutions to the maximum
28
-------
extent practicable.
Because the Selected Remedy will result in hazardous substances remaining onsite above
levels that allow for unlimited use and unrestricted exposure, a review will be conducted within
five years after commencement of the interim remedial action to ensure that the remedy
continues to provide adequate protection of human health and the environment. Such reviews
will be conducted a minimum of every five years thereafter, until EPA determines that
hazardous substances remaining at the Site do not prevent unlimited use and unrestricted
exposure at the Site.
A. Compliance with Applicable or Relevant and Appropriate Requirements
An interim remedial action must comply with (or waive) those Federal and State requirements
that are applicable or relevant and appropriate to the limited-scope action. Therefore, the
focus is only on those ARARs specific to this interim remedial action. While the final remedial
action for OU1 will address the remaining Site-related contamination in all media, this interim
remedial action for OU2 will implement limited action to prevent human exposure to
contaminated groundwater in residential wells. The final remedial action for OU1, after any
necessary public participation requirements are met, will address the remaining unacceptable
risks presented by the Site.
A complete list of ARARs and TBCs for the Selected Remedy for OU2 is provided in Appendix B.
The major ARARs identified therein include, but are not limited to:
• National Primary Drinking Water Standards: 40 C.F.R. §§ 141.50, 141.61 and 141.62
establish health-based standards (i.e., Maximum Contaminant Level Goals (MCLGs) and
MCLs) for public drinking water.
• Delaware Regulations Governing the Construction and Use of Wells: 7 Del. Admin. C.
§7301 contains requirements governing the location, design, installation, use,
modification, repair, and sealing of all wells and associated equipment as well as
requirements for public and private potable wells.
B. Cost-Effectiveness
The NCP, at 40 C.F.R. § 300.430(f)(l)(ii)(D), requires EPA to evaluate cost-effectiveness by
evaluating all the alternatives meeting the threshold criteria (protection of human health and the
environment and compliance with ARARs) against long-term effectiveness and permanence,
reduction of toxicity, mobility or volume through treatment, and short-term effectiveness to
determine overall effectiveness. Then overall effectiveness is compared to cost to determine
cost-effectiveness. As presented in Section X (Comparative Analysis of Alternatives), above, the
Selected Remedy provides the most long-term effectiveness and permanence, followed by
Alternative 4, and significantly trailed by Alternative 3 and then 2. All four alternatives are
evaluated equally for purposes of reduction of toxicity, mobility and volume through treatment
29
-------
since none of the alternatives would treat COCs. Each of the alternatives would pose a
manageable amount of impact on effectiveness in the short term. Thus, the Selected Remedy is
strongest in overall effectiveness. Further, Alternative 5, the Selected Remedy, is less costly
than Alternatives 4 and 3, the next most cost effective alternatives.
The Selected Remedy is cost-effective in providing overall protection of human health and the
environment by limiting the risk posed by Site COCs and meets all other requirements of
CERCLA and the NCP at a cost that is proportional to or less than the other alternatives that
were evaluated. Further, the Selected Remedy is readily implementable and provides a high
degree of both short- and long-term effectiveness. The estimated present value of the Selected
Remedy is approximately $5,738,000.
C. Utilization of Permanent Solutions and Alternative Treatment Technologies to
the Maximum Extent Practicable and Preference for Treatment as a Principal
Element
The Selected Remedy is an interim remedial action to protect people from exposure to
contamination in drinking water from groundwater. The Selected Remedy is not intended to
treat contamination or provide a permanent solution to contamination in groundwater. A
future proposed plan and decision document will address remaining contamination present in
all media at the Site for OU1.
D. Five Year Review Requirements
CERCLA Section 121(c), 42 U.S.C. § 9621(c), and Section 300.430(f)(4)(ii) of the NCP, 40 C.F.R. §
300.430(f)(4)(ii), require review of a remedy if the remedy results in hazardous substances,
pollutants, or contaminants remaining on-site above levels that allow for unlimited use and
unrestricted exposure. Any such review must be conducted no less often than every five years
after initiation of the interim remedial action.
Because hazardous substances will remain at the Site, the review required by Section 121(c) of
CERCLA and Section 300.430(f)(4)(ii) of the NCP will be conducted no less often than every five
years after initiation of the interim remedial action.
E. Documentation of Significant Changes
The Proposed Plan was released for public comment on June 29, 2023. EPA has reviewed all
comments submitted during the public comment period and determined that no significant
changes were necessary or appropriate to be made to the Selected Remedy, as originally
identified as the Preferred Alternative in the Proposed Plan.
30
-------
3. RESPONSIVENESS SUMMARY
This Responsiveness Summary summarizes the significant comments and concerns received
during the public comment period for the Proposed Plan for the Site and provides EPA's
responses to those comments. After reviewing and considering all public comments received
during the public comment period, EPA's Selected Remedy for OU2 \s Alternative 5—
Connection to Public Water Line and ICs.
The Proposed Plan and supporting documents were made available to the public in the
Administrative Record File, which was compiled to support selection of this Interim Remedial
Action. EPA provided notice to the public that the Administrative Record File could be viewed
online at https://semspub.epa.gov/src/collection/03/AR67374. or at the following locations:
Seaford District Library
600 N. Market Street
Seaford, DE 19973
Mon-Fri 10:00 am to 6:00 pm
(302) 629-2524
EPA Administrative Records Room
Administrative Records Coordinator
Four Penn Center
1600 John F. Kennedy Boulevard
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Phone:(215) 814-2469
Hours: Monday - Friday 8:30 am to 4:00 pm
By appointment only
The notice of availability of these documents was published in the Seaford Star and a fact sheet
detailing the Proposed Plan was mailed to local citizens on June 29, 2023.
A public comment period was held from June 29, 2023, until July 28, 2023. EPA held a public
meeting on July 20, 2023, at the Blades Fire Company, located at 200 E. 5th Street, Blades,
Delaware 19973. During the public meeting, EPA gave a formal presentation on EPA's Proposed
Plan, followed by a "Question and Answer" session where representatives from EPA answered
questions regarding the Site and the Proposed Plan. No written comments were received on
the Proposed Plan.
July 20. 2023 Public Meeting
All comments provided in this Responsiveness Summary are from the July 20, 2023 public
meeting. At this meeting, numerous question and comments were posed. Several of these
questions and comments did not pertain to OU2 and the specific cleanup alternatives from the
Proposed Plan and, thus, are not provided in this Responsiveness Summary. Below is a
summary of the public comments and EPA's responses during the public meeting. Repeated
questions and comments received during the public meeting are only listed once and similar
questions and comments are grouped together.
For full questions and corresponding answers provided at the public meeting, please see the
transcript of the public meeting, which is included in the Administrative Record.
31
-------
Comments Related to OU2 and the Specific Cleanup Alternatives from the Proposed Plan
Comment #1: A commentor asked if the distribution of public water would be metered.
EPA Response: EPA responded, yes, the water would be metered. Once connected,
residents would be responsible for the recurring water bill.
Comment #2: A commentor asked if the existing POET/POUT systems can stay in the house if
they want to keep it (post water line installation).
EPA Response: EPA responded that residents could keep the existing POET/POUT
system(s). However, EPA would no longer maintain the systems and the
cost/maintenance would be the responsibility of the resident.
Comment #3: A commentor mentioned they live in an area that would be at the end of the
proposed water line. They asked what happens to all the material and chemicals that flush
down the water line and expressed concerns about being at the end of the line and receiving
the residual material.
EPA Response: The design of the water line would be fully determined during the design
phase, but it is common for water lines to be configured as loop systems rather than
capping at the end of a road. The loop system would be considered on this project.
Comment #4: A commentor asked what the charge would be for the wastewater. The
commentor elaborated they would get charged for how much water they use, plus the sewage
going back. The commentor asked if that is included or if it would be separate.
EPA Response: EPA responded that the Preferred Alternative only involves providing
public water connections and does not include sewage/wastewater.
Comment #5: A commentor expressed their concern with the amount of water volume the
water line is going to take and whether the aquifer will be sustained. They asked will the aquifer
be able to handle this.
EPA Response: This information would be considered and determined during the design
phase. This includes activities such as aquifer testing to understand if and how
additional home connections would influence the aquifer.
Comment #6: A commentor asked, "what's the water pressure to the line?"
EPA Response: EPA did not know the exact water pressure at the time of this question
but ensured those present that the water line would meet all minimum water pressure
requirements and considerations for pounds per square inch (PSI) would be evaluated
32
-------
during the design phase for all piping structures.
Comment #7: A commentor asked if they could keep their well for irrigation because it would
be too costly to irrigate their land using public water.
EPA Response: EPA encouraged residents to allow EPA to abandon their well because of
unknown potential future risks from contamination, but EPA responded that as of now,
yes, residents can keep their private well for non-potable use if risks related to the
intended use allow for it.
Comment #8: A commentor asked if Blades has any plans to incorporate/annex the residents
outside of the town limits into the town. The commentor expressed opposition to this.
EPA Response: EPA responded that the current plan is to annex the residents into the
water authority but not into the Town of Blades.
Comment #9: A commentor asked if someone wants to build a new house or new building on
vacant parcels, will they be able to connect to the water line.
EPA Response: EPA responded certainly they can connect to the water line. If the new
construction occurs after the implementation of the water line, the property owner
would be responsible to cover the cost to connect.
Comment #10: A commentor asked if EPA has a time frame for all of this to happen.
EPA Response: EPA responded that following this public meeting the next step is to
develop the Record of Decision which may take approximately six months from now to
complete. The second phase is to design the remedy. Typically, designs take anywhere
from two to three years, but this period could vary with unforeseen circumstances.
Following the design approval, it is estimated the remedial action would be
implemented in one year.
Comment #11: A commentor asked, "what's the cost for the monthly water bill?"
EPA Response: EPA responded that according to the Blades municipality website, there
is a minimum $35.00/month charge that will cover the first 3,000 gallons. Any additional
usage is charged at $6.15/1,000 gallons.
Comment #12: A commentor in support of EPA's previous response to Comment #9 stated that
when they moved to town, they took advantage of connecting to the Blade's public water line
(formerly on private well water). They stated that the house includes two and a half baths and,
with comfortable water usage, their water bill is in fact $35. They stated that the contractors
the Town of Blades hired to connect the house to the water line were very cordial and mindful
of the residents and their property. The experience was fantastic, and it exceeded their
33
-------
expectations. The commentor said that, before connecting to public water, they had concerns
similar to those expressed by others in the meeting about water bills but the commenter was
pleasantly surprised with the process.
EPA Response: EPA thanked the commentor for their support and for offering their real-
life experience from a similar project.
Comment #13: A commentor asked if something was going to be done for the 73 families that
are affected over the two- or three-year period waiting for the water line to be installed.
EPA Response: EPA stated that the 73 homes includes homes that are currently
impacted, and homes that have the potential to be impacted over time, should
contamination migrate. Based upon the residential sampling efforts, the homes that had
elevated concentrations of contamination in their well water were addressed by EPA
through a Removal Action where treatment systems were installed at the residences.
Comment #14: A commentor asked if EPA felt comfortable to install a well to some depth that
was not contaminated. They asked if 300 feet was deep enough.
EPA Response: EPA stated that the nature and extent of contamination is still being
assessed under Operable Unit 1. It is the agency's current understanding that the
contamination is primarily in the shallow aquifer, however, there may be areas where
groundwater migrates deeper.
To that point, one of the alternatives that was evaluated (Alternative 4) was targeting
new deep wells 250-300 feet below ground surface into the Choptank Aquifer. This
aquifer/depth is desirable because the St. Mary's confining unit overlays the Choptank
Aquifer which would act as a barrier in the event contamination migrates vertically to
that depth. EPA also explained that the downside of drilling a large number of wells
through the confining layer is that it may create pathways for contamination to migrate
vertically into the Choptank Aquifer.
Comment #15: A commentor asked what the life expectancy of the carbon filters is that are
currently being used by the Town of Blades. The commentor elaborated there was a quote in
the News Journal at the time the carbon filters were installed on the public water that said the
filters would eventually be spent. The commentor asked who would absorb the cost of
replacing these filters.
EPA Response: EPA indicated the Town of Blades, as the water authority, would be
responsible for replacement of the treatment system carbon filters. EPA indicated there
has been ongoing monitoring to evaluate over time to determine how the carbon is
functioning and if there is any evidence of contaminant breakthrough (exceeding or
close to exceeding drinking water standards). While EPA cannot predict the exact life
expectancy of the carbon filters, EPA did mention that the public water has been
34
-------
sampled 12 times on a quarterly basis and has not shown signs of breakthrough.
After further consideration of the question and post-meeting discussions with DNREC,
EPA would like to clarify and expand the response. The length of time that carbon will
remain effective is not based on a fixed length of time but is based on the variable
conditions such as the amount of water flowing through the treatment system,
contaminant concentrations and other water chemistry conditions. The best way to
determine when to replace the carbon is based on the effluent concentration
(determined from testing a water sample collected after the water has passed through
the carbon treatment system). The groundwater analytical result concentrations
collected from the effluent are analyzed over time. The water provider uses the data to
determine when the concentrations will become close to exceeding the drinking water
standard or when the contaminant levels could be expected to exceed the drinking
water standard; at that time, the carbon will be replaced. Since the effluent
concentrations are still very low, EPA is not able to estimate when to expect
breakthrough and thus is not able to determine when the carbon will need to be
replaced.
Comment #16: A commentor asked if EPA will continue to monitor the treated water after the
water line is in.
EPA Response: EPA stated that the water provider is responsible for the ongoing
treatment and sampling of provided water. After the commentor expressed concerns
regarding whether the water provider will faithfully ensure the quality of the public
water, EPA indicated there are annual water quality reports and publicly available
information to provide the community with results and provide confirmation to the
community that the treatment is functioning properly.
Comment #17: A commentor asked, "If EPA came in and found the PFAS contamination, how
come Blades didn't find this years ago?"
EPA Response: EPA cannot comment on behalf of the Town of Blades, however, PFAS is
a relatively recently discovered contaminant in groundwater. Until 2018, EPA and DNREC were
not aware that PFAS could be in drinking water or that sampling for PFAS was necessary. As
PFAS became better understood, including the industrial uses of the compound, it prompted
EPA and DNREC to begin investigating.
Comment #18: A commentor asked if any wells have been tested on the other side of Morgan
Branch.
EPA Response: EPA stated the current understanding is OU2 is hydraulically bounded by
the Nanticoke River and Morgan Branch. As the OU1 remedial investigation continues, if
evidence is discovered suggesting the contamination is migrating beyond the water
body boundaries, EPA will respond accordingly.
35
-------
Comment #19: A commentor asked, "If the water should all of a sudden clear up in the next
four or five years, can I go back using my private well?"
EPA Response: EPA stated that the Selected Remedy will be implemented until groundwater is
restored to its beneficial use. When the groundwater no longer poses an unacceptable risk to
human health and the environment, the commenter can go back to using their private well for
drinking water. However, EPA noted restoration of groundwater to beneficial use can take
decades.
36
-------
FIGURES
Figure 1: Site Location Map
Figure 2: Site Layout
Figure 3: 2021-2022 Residential Well Sampling
Figure 4: Selected Remedy - Water Main Extension
37
-------
S Md^on
Delaware
Community
Park «.
Devils'
-island
Lakeside J*sti
Mofcle Home
Uxr/Nanticoke'
Todds Court
Mo&!« Home PyK
38
-------
[WiojSSi
Legend
ra Town of Blades Boundary
Procino Plating
Former Blades Commercial
¦¦¦¦ Complex
Figure 2
Site Layout
I I Former Peninsula Plating Facility
Stream/River
Client EPA
Project FS at Blades Groundwater, DE
Map: Source: Esri, Maxar, Earthstar Geographies, and the GIS User
Community
AECOM
Revised: 4/28/2023
2,000
1 inch = 1,000 feet
inet.com\irs\AMER\Germantown-usGRM2\DC3\Prc5ects\ENV\GEARS\GEO\Biades_H;i\MXDs\ou2_FS\Fig_2_sitejayout_PVVS.mxd
39
-------
40
-------
Legend
SH "own of Blades Boundary
- Proposed 6-inch Water Line
cuen us Environmental Protection Agency Region 3
WkA 12420 Milestone Center Drive
MVVI German town, M D 20B76
N
+
Figure 4
Selected Remedy - Water Main Extension
project FS at Blades Groundw ater, DE
rd-iocd mam-
¦mr
¦mm wm
*
***
RH4-.M^fl Fiiuru- FI-i.Mm-f.FwIhH* Ghi rM|il ink. H ill II h r,IK l.SHr ~iri iiriui11/
m
wmm
41
-------
APPENDIX A
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD INDEX
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION III
1600 John F. Kennedy Blvd.
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103
BLADES GROUNDWATER
OU 2 REMEDIAL ACTION ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE
INDEX OF DOCUMENTS
AVAILABLE 6/29/2023, UPDATED//2024
https://semspub.epa.gov/src/collection/03/AR67374
-------
Introduction
The "Administrative Record" is the collection of documents which form the basis for the U. S.
Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) selection of a response action at a Superfund site.
Superfund is the name given to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,
and Liability Act (CERCLA) which can be found in Title 42 of the U.S. Code (U.S.C.) at Sections
9601 through 9675. Response actions under Superfund can be either "removal actions" or
"remedial actions." As the EPA decides what to do at the site of a release of hazardous
substances, the EPA compiles documents concerning the site and EPA's decision into an
"Administrative Record File." Documents may be added to the Administrative Record File from
time to time. Once the EPA Regional Administrator or the Regional Administrator's delegate
signs the decision document memorializing the selection of an action, the documents which
form the basis for the selection of an action are known as the "Administrative Record." An
Administrative Record file is required by CERCLA, as amended by the Superfund Amendments
and Reauthorization Act (SARA).
The Administrative Record will be available for public review during normal business hours in an
electronic computer imaged format at the selected repository and by appointment only at the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 3 office which is located at the address given on
the cover page. The Administrative Record is treated as a non-circulating reference document.
Individuals may review documents contained in the Administrative Record, according to the
procedures at the local repository and at the EPA Region 3 office. The Administrative Record
will be maintained at the repository until further notice. EPA may send additional documents to
the repository as work progresses at the Site. The EPA may hold formal public comment periods
at certain stages of the response process. The public is urged to use the formal public comment
periods to submit written comments to the EPA regarding the actions at the Site.
Except as explained below, this index and the record were compiled in accordance with the
EPA's Revised Guidance on Compiling Administrative Records for CERCLA Response Actions,
EPA/OSRE/OEM/OSRTI (September 20, 2010), and/or in accordance with Superfund Removal
Procedures Public Participation Guidance for On-Scene Coordinators: Community Relations and
the Administrative Record, OSWER 9360.3-05 (July 1992), and/or the National Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP), 40 CFR Part 300. Consistent with 40
CFR Sections 300.805 (a) (2), and 300.810 (a) (2), Region 3 has listed, in the Administrative
Record Index (or in bibliographies of documents listed in the Index), guidance documents which
may form a basis for the selection of this response action (EPA Guidance Documents, Non-Site
Specific). Unless the guidance documents indexed were generated specifically for the Site, the
guidance documents may not be present in the Administrative Record. However, it should be
noted that the EPA does maintain an extensive collection of Superfund response action
guidance documents available in electronic format on the EPA website at:
https://www.epa.eov/superfund/superfund-policy-euidance-and-laws.
2
-------
Additionally, the EPA guidance related to Superfund cleanup enforcement may be found on the
website at the following address:
http://cfpub.epa.eov/compliance/resources/policies/cleanup/superfund.
This page is titled, "Superfund Cleanup Policies and Guidance."
The Administrative Record is listed in chronological order with the earliest dated document at
the top and followed by documents which may be "Undated."
Documents in the Administrative Record File have been redacted due to the presence of
confidential business information, personal identifiable information, and/or other privileged
materials. The redactions are evident from the face of the document and the word "Redacted"
appears in the title on the index.
3
-------
OU 2 REMEDIAL ACTION ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE
BLADES GROUNDWATER INDEX OF DOCUMENTS In CHRONOLOGICAL Order
Updated //2024
DOC ID
DOC DATE
TITLE
PAGE COUNT
ADDRESSEE NAME
AUTHOR NAME
2342514
02/16/2021
REDACTED FINAL FIELD SAMPLING PLAN
110
ROVIRA,EDUARDO (EPA)
SOLLENBERGER,CHRIS (TETRATECH INC.)
2342512
04/01/2021
REDACTED FINAL COMPREHENSIVE QUALITY ASSURANCE
PROJECT PLAN (QAPP) - REVISION 1
134
(EPA)
(AECOM)
2342510
04/08/2021
REDACTED DRAFT TRIP REPORT - BACKGROUND MONITORING
WELL INSTALLATION (COVER LETTER ATTACHED)
30
TAYLOR,DANIEL (EPA)
SOLLENBERGER,CHRIS (TETRATECH INC.)
2342509
11/01/2021
REDACTED AMENDMENTTO COMPREHENSIVE QUALITY
ASSURANCE PROJECT PLAN (QAPP) - REVISION 2
15
(EPA)
(AECOM)
2339302
12/06/2021
REDACTED TRIP REPORT - 6/2021 PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY
SAMPLING EVENT
30
TAYLOR,DANIEL (EPA)
(AECOM)
2336396
12/21/2021
REDACTED FINAL TRIP REPORT - 4/2021 SECOND QUARTERLY
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING EVENT (COVER LETTER ATTACHED)
155
(EPA)
(TETRATECH)
2336398
12/21/2021
REDACTED FINAL TRIP REPORT - 7/2021 SECOND QUARTERLY
GROUNDWATER SAMPLING EVENT (COVER LETTER ATTACHED)
163
(EPA)
(TETRATECH)
2336399
03/01/2022
REDACTED TRIP REPORT -11/2021 THIRD QUARTERLY
BACKGROUND WELL SAMPLING EVENT
17
TAYLOR,DANIEL (EPA)
(AECOM)
2334965
03/22/2022
ACTION MEMORANDUM: REQUEST FOR FUNDS FOR REMOVAL
ACTION & CONSISTENCY EXEMPTION FROM 12-MONTH LIMIT
10
LEONARD,PAUL (EPA)
LEONARD,PAUL (EPA) | ROVIRA,EDUARDO
(EPA) |TOWLE,MICHAEL,T (EPA)
2345902
04/04/2022
REDACTED TRIP REPORT - 9/2021 & 10/2021 RESIDENTIAL
WELL SAMPLING EVENT
102
TAYLOR,DANIEL (EPA)
(AECOM)
2339303
04/27/2022
REDACTED TRIP REPORT -1/2022 PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY
SAMPLING EVENT
12
TAYLOR,DANIEL (EPA)
(AECOM)
2339304
04/27/2022
REDACTED TRIP REPORT -10/2021 PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY
SAMPLING EVENT
14
TAYLOR,DANIEL (EPA)
(AECOM)
2336397
04/27/2022
REDACTED TRIP REPORT -1/2022 FOURTH QUARTERLY
BACKGROUND WELL SAMPLING EVENT
45
TAYLOR,DANIEL (EPA)
(AECOM)
2342513
06/01/2022
REDACTED FINAL REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION WORK PLAN
406
(EPA)
(AECOM)
2342508
06/01/2022
REDACTED FINAL COMPREHENSIVE QUALITY ASSURANCE
PROJECT PLAN (QAPP)
241
(EPA)
(AECOM)
2338485
06/27/2022
OU 2 SCREENING OF ALTERNATIVES
8
TAYLOR,DANIEL (EPA)
(AECOM)
2342511
08/01/2022
REDACTED OU 2 FINAL REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT
456
TAYLOR,DANIEL (EPA)
(AECOM)
2338587
08/08/2022
TRIP REPORT - 5/2022 EXISTING MONITORING WELL
INVENTORY & STREAM GAUGE INSTALLATION EVENT
8
TAYLOR,DANIEL (EPA)
(AECOM)
4
-------
OU 2 REMEDIAL ACTION ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE
BLADES GROUNDWATER INDEX OF DOCUMENTS In CHRONOLOGICAL Order
Updated //2024
DOC ID
DOC DATE
TITLE
PAGE COUNT
ADDRESSEE NAME
AUTHOR NAME
2334964
08/11/2022
ACTION MEMORANDUM: REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL FUNDS
FOR REMOVAL ACTION & CHANGE OF SCOPE
9
LEONARD,PAUL (EPA)
LEONARD,PAUL (EPA) | ROVIRA,EDUARDO
(EPA) |TOWLE,MICHAEL,T (EPA)
2339300
08/26/2022
REDACTED TRIP REPORT - 4/2022 PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY
SAMPLING EVENT
31
TAYLOR,DANIEL (EPA)
(AECOM)
2339306
09/13/2022
REDACTED FINAL TRIP REPORT - 4/2022 & 5/2022 RESIDENTIAL
WELL RESAMPLING EVENT
12
TAYLOR,DANIEL (EPA)
(AECOM)
2342522
11/22/2022
REDACTED TRIP REPORT - 7/2022 PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY
SAMPLING EVENT
14
TAYLOR,DANIEL (EPA)
(AECOM)
2342525
12/02/2022
REDACTED TRIP REPORT - 7/2022 RESIDENTIAL WELL
CONFIRMATION SAMPLING EVENT
14
TAYLOR,DANIEL (EPA)
(AECOM)
2342516
12/06/2022
TRIP REPORT - 7/2022 EXISTING WELL SAMPLING & SYNOPTIC
GAUGING EVENT
103
TAYLOR,DANIEL (EPA)
(AECOM)
2345901
01/01/2023
REDACTED OU 2 FINAL DETAILED ALTERNATIVES EVALUATION
114
(EPA)
(AECOM)
2345900
02/01/2023
REDACTED OU 2 FINAL FEASIBILITY STUDY (FFS)
138
(EPA)
(AECOM)
2342524
02/21/2023
REDACTED TRIP REPORT - 8/2022 & 10/2022 RESIDENTIAL
WELL CONFIRMATION SAMPLING EVENTS
14
TAYLOR,DANIEL (EPA)
(AECOM)
2342523
03/10/2023
REDACTED TRIP REPORT -10/2022 PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY
SAMPLING EVENT
14
TAYLOR,DANIEL (EPA)
(AECOM)
2345102
05/08/2023
MEMO TO FILE REGARDING UPDATES FROM
FEASIBILITY/REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVE EVALUATION &
PROPOSED PLAN
21
(FILE)
TAYLOR,DANIEL (EPA)
2347864
06/01/2023
FACT SHEET: EPA PROPOSES PLAN TO PROVIDE CLEAN WATER
TO AFFECTED RESIDENTS
4
(EPA)
2347865
06/29/2023
OU 2 PROPOSED REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN (PRAP)
28
(EPA)
2368370
07/20/2023
OU 2 PROPOSED REMEDIAL ACTION PLAN (PRAP) PUBLIC
MEETING TRANSCRIPT
93
(LEXITAS LEGAL)
2368369
11/06/2023
OU 2 PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT AMONG EPA &
DELAWARE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE (COVER
LETTER ATTACHED)
19
KILLSCROW,BRAD (DELAWARE TRIBE OF
INDIANS) | LEONARD,PAUL
(EPA) | RATSEP,TIMOTHY (DE DEPT OF
NATURAL RESOURCES &
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL
(DNREC))|SAVERY,SUZANNE (DELAWARE
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE)
5
-------
APPENDIX B
ARARs and TBCs
-------
ARAR
Citation
Class
Synopsis
Relevance to Remedy
Chemical-Specific
Maximum Contaminant
40 C.F.R. §§
Relevant and
Establishes maximum contaminant levels
Groundwater in the area of concern is currently
Levels (MCLs) promulgated
141.61 and
appropriate
(MCLs) for common organic and inorganic
being used as a source of drinking water for
under the Safe Drinking
62.
contaminants, which are applicable to
residents. MCLs establish health-based standards
Water Act of 1974, as
public drinking water supplies.
(i.e., MCLs) for public drinking water. MCLs are
amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300f
relevant and appropriate since the selected
et seq. (SDWA)
remedy of a public drinking water line is required
to meet MCLs in order to provide potable water to
residents.
Safe Drinking Water Act,
40 C.F.R. §
Relevant and
Establishes non-zero maximum
Ground water in the area of concern is currently
National Primary Drinking
141.51(b).
appropriate
contaminant level goals (MCLGs) for public
being used for public consumption by residents. A
Water Regulations- MCL
water supplies. MCLGs are health goals for
public drinking water supply line will be designed
Goals (MCLGs)
drinking water sources.
and implemented to supply drinking water to all
residences in OU2.
Drinking Water Health
None
To Be
Health Advisories are estimates of risk
PFAS compounds have been detected in the area of
Advisory for PFOA and PFOS
Considered
from consumption of contaminated
this interim remedial action.
(EPA Office of Drinking
drinking water. They provide information
Water), 2016
on contaminants that can cause human
health effects and are known or
anticipated to occur in drinking water.
Interim Drinking Water
None
To Be
Health Advisories are estimates of risk
PFAS compounds have been detected in the area of
Health Advisory for
Considered
from consumption of contaminated
this interim remedial action.
perfluorooctanoic acid
drinking water. They provide information
(PFOA) [EPA 822-R-
on contaminants that can cause human
22-003] and
health effects and are known or
perfluorooctanesulfonic
anticipated to occur in drinking water.
acid (PFOS) [EPA 822-
R-22-004] (EPA Office
of Water), 2022
EPA Proposed National
None
To Be
Establishes a proposed maximum
PFAS compounds have been detected in the area
Primary Drinking Water
Considered
contaminant level for PFOA and PFOS
subject to this interim remedial action.
Regulation (NPDWR) for
applicable to all public water supplies
PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, HFPO-DA,
Nationwide.
PFHxS, and PFBS.
Delaware Regulations
16 Del.
Relevant and
These regulations define the maximum
Groundwater in the area of concern is currently
Governing Drinking Water
Admin. C. §
Appropriate
contaminant levels (MCLs) for potable use
being used as a source of drinking water for
-------
Systems
4462-9.0.
of groundwater.
residents. MCLs establish health-based standards
(i.e., MCLs) for public drinking water. MCLs are
relevant and appropriate since the selected
remedy of a public drinking water line is required
to meet MCLs in order to provide potable water to
residents.
Delaware Proposed Statute
Governing Drinking Water
Systems
Del. H.B. 8,
151st Gen.
Assem.
(2021).
To Be
Considered
Delaware has proposed a statute directing
DNREC and DPH to work together to issue
primary MCLs for PFOA and PFOS. In
anticipation, Delaware DPH has issued an
implementation plan proposing MCLs for
PFOS-14 parts per trillion/liter (ng/l),
PFOA-21 ng/l and combined 17 ng/l.
PFAS compounds have been detected in the area of
this interim remedial action.
ARAR
Citation
Class
Synopsis
Relevance to Remedy
Location-Specific
Regulations promulgated
under Section 106 of the
National Historical
Preservation Act of 1966, as
amended (NHPA) 54 U.S.C. §
306108
36 C.F.R
Part 800
Applicable
Section 106 of the NHPA requires any
Federal undertaking to consider the effect
the activity may have on any historic
property. It is the responsibility of a
Federal agency to identify historic
properties potentially affected by an
undertaking, assess its effects and seek
ways to avoid, minimize or mitigate any
adverse effects on historic properties.
The water line construction meets the definition of
an "undertaking" under 36 C.F.R. § 800.16(y).
Accordingly, EPA will take the appropriate steps to
identify historic property and then after assessing
its potential effects, seek ways to avoid, or
minimize those effects.
Regulations under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act of
1918, as amended ("MBTA"),
16 U.S.C. § 703
16 U.S.C. §
703 and 50
C.F.R. §
10.13
Applicable
Section 703 of the MBTA prohibits the take
(including killing, capturing, selling,
trading, and transport) of protected
migratory bird species that are native to
the United States without prior
authorization by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Services("FWS"). The species protected as
migratory birds under the MBTA are listed
in 50 C.F.R. § 10.13.
Appropriate actions will be taken during the water
line construction to ensure that no on-Site
migratory birds listed at 50 C.F.R. § 10.13, or their
nests are adversely affected.
Consultation requirements
under Section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act of
50 C.F.R. §§
402.01-
402.17
Applicable
The ESA requires consultation between
the FWS and other Federal agencies to
ensure that any agency action authorized,
Consultation will occur with FWS to ensure the
water line construction does not jeopardize the
continued existence of any endangered or
-------
1973, as amended ("ESA"),
16 U.S.C § 1536
funded, or carried out by these agencies is
not likely to jeopardize the continued
existence of any endangered or
threatened species or result in the
destruction or adverse modification of
habitat of such species.
threatened species or result in the destruction or
adverse modification of habitat of these species.
Protection of Floodplains
44 C.F.R §§
9.2-9.18
Relevant and
Appropriate
Requires minimization of harm to or within
the floodplain.
There is a potential for work to be performed
within the floodplains of the Nanticoke River and
Morgan Branch. 6
Protection of Wetlands
44 C.F.R §§
9.2-9.18
Relevant and
Appropriate
Requires the minimization of the
destruction, loss, or degradation of
wetlands.
Requires the preservation and
enhancement of the natural and beneficial
wetlands values.
There is potential for work to be performed that
may impact wetlands.7
ARAR
Citation
Class
Synopsis
Relevance to Remedy
Action-Specific
Stormwater regulations
promulgated under the CWA,
33 U.S.C. §§ 1251 et seq.
40 C.F.R. §
122.26(c)(1)
(ii)
Relevant and
Appropriate
This regulation requires the operator of a
new stormwater discharge associated with
small construction activity, as defined by
40 C.F.R. § 122.26(b)(15), to maintain
certain information about the nature of
the site, the nature of on-site activities,
proposed best management practices to
control pollutants in stormwater during
Provides best management practices to control
contaminants of concern in stormwater during the
construction of the water line. Information
required to be maintained under this regulation
will be reported to appropriate Delaware and
Federal officials. No permit will be obtained.8
6 See also (1) Executive Order 11988, Section 1 (which requires action to reduce the risk of flood loss, to minimize the impact of floods on human safety, health and
welfare, and to restore and preserve the natural and beneficial values served by floodplains) and 2(a)(2) (which requires consideration of alternatives to avoid
adverse effects and incompatible development in floodplains); (2) Executive Order 13690, Section 2(c) (which requires use of natural systems, ecosystem processes,
and nature-based approaches when developing alternatives for consideration). Federal Agencies are required to comply with executive order requirements.
7 See also Executive Order 11990, Section 1(a) (which requires action to minimize the destruction, loss, or degradation of wetlands and to preserve and enhance
beneficial values of wetlands) and 2(a) (which requires taking action to avoid construction in wetlands unless there is no practicable alternative to such construction
and the proposed action includes all practicable measures to minimize harm to wetlands which may result from such use). Federal Agencies are required to comply
with executive order requirements.
8 See 42 U.S.C. § 9621(e) and 40 C.F.R. § 300.400(e) (No Federal, state, or local permit is required for the on-site portion of a response action conducted under
Section 104 of CERCLA. The term on-site means the areal extent of contamination and all suitable areas in very close proximity to the contamination necessary for
implementation of the response action.)
-------
and after construction activities, an
estimate of the runoff coefficient of the
site, and the name(s) of the receiving
water(s).
Delaware Hazardous
7 Del. C. Ch.
Relevant and
HSCA gives DNREC the authority to ensure
The interim remedy being implemented at the site
Substance Cleanup Act
91.
Appropriate
cleanup of facilities with a release or
will be conducted under oversight from Delaware
(HSCA)
imminent threat of release of hazardous
substances.
HSCA.
Delaware Regulations
7 Del.
Relevant and
Establishes the long-term stewardship of a
The regulations will establish institutional controls,
Governing Hazardous
Admin. C. §
Appropriate
remedial action including maintenance,
such as a groundwater management zone that may
Substance Cleanup
1375-12.7.5
monitoring environmental covenants, and
required compliance with institutional
controls.
be required following completion of the remedy.
Delaware Regulations
16 Del.
Applicable
Establishes plans and specifications for the
The interim remedy chosen for implementation is
Governing Drinking Water
Admin. C. §
construction of a new public water supply
the construction and installation of a public water
Systems
4462-1.11.
or alteration of an existing public water
supply.
supply line to serve the area of concern.
Delaware Regulations
26 Del. C. §
Relevant and
Establishes regulations of all public utilities
The chosen interim remedy is the installation of a
Governing Public Service
203C
Appropriate
including their rates, property rights,
public water line.
Commission
equipment, facilities, service territories
and franchises. These regulations address
the expansion of a water supply lines.
Delaware Sediment and
7 Del.
Relevant and
Establish the Delaware statewide sediment
The interim remedy being implemented is
Stormwater Regulations
Admin. C. §§
Appropriate
and stormwater management plans
construction of a public water utility line. Sections
5101-3.4.1.5
requirements including those for
3.4.1.5 and 3.7.15 are relevant and appropriate to
and 3.7.15
dewatering of trenches and minor liner
utility disturbances.
any soil disturbance for the water line installation if
the soil disturbance is greater than 1.0 acres, all the
requirements for the Construction General Permit
will be required including minimizing sediment
tracking and removing of the sediment from the
roadway.
Regulations Governing the
7 Del.
Relevant and
Establishes minimum requirements
The interim remedy chosen is the installation of
Construction and Use of
Admin. C. §
Appropriate
governing the location, design, installation,
new public water line serving the residences in the
Wells
7301-3.6;
use, disinfection, modification, repair, and
Site. The remedy will comply with all relevant and
3.12.4;
sealing of all wells and associated
appropriate requirements to use, cap, and
3.12.9;
equipment as well as requirements for
abandon any private drinking water wells which
5.5.9;
public and private potable water wells.
will no longer be used following implementation.
-------
5.5.10;
5.11.5; 10.3
As well as any relevant and appropriate
requirements in the event a new public water well
is required in order to supply water to the Towns of
Blades public water supply.
Delaware Regulations
Governing the Allocation of
Water
7 Del.
Admin. C. §
7303-3.4;
5.5
Relevant and
Appropriate
Establishes authority for Delaware to
regulate the withdraw of groundwater for
public use.
The interim remedy chosen for implementation is
the installation of a public water supply line.
Groundwater modeling may be necessary to make
sure current Town of Blades public water supply
wells are adequate for additional residents.
Additionally, if modeling shows that existing supply
will not meet the capacity needs these regulations
provide for new water allocation permit
perimeters.
Delaware Air Quality
Management Regulations
7 Del.
Admin. C. §§
1103-1.6;
3.0; 11
Relevant and
Appropriate
The regulations establish the ambient air
quality and particulate emissions for the
state of Delaware.
The interim remedy will include excavation of the
water line areas. These regulations will apply to
any dust or emissions from construction vehicles.
Delaware Air Quality
Management Regulations
7 Del.
Admin. C. §
1106
Relevant and
Appropriate
The regulations establish particulate
emissions during construction and
material handling.
The interim remedy will include excavation of the
water line areas. These regulations will apply to
any dust or emissions from construction vehicles.
Delaware Division of
Transportation Solutions
2 Del.
Admin. C. §§
2400- 3.0 -
4.0.
Relevant and
Appropriate
Establishes Regulations within the State of
Delaware including policies and
procedures for adjusting, relocating, and
accommodating utility facilities and private
lines within the public right-of-way of
DelDOT-maintained highways and streets,
including any utility work related to
highway project construction in the right-
of-way of DelDOT-maintained streets and
highways.
The chosen interim remedy is the installation of a
public water line that will use the right of way in
public right of way.
Delaware Regulations
Governing Control of Water
Pollution
7 Del.
Admin. C. §
7201,
Subsections
Applicable
Contains water quality regulations for
discharging into surface and groundwater.
Applicable for potential discharge of treated
groundwater into surface water (dewater). Also
applicable for potential storm water runoff into
Morgan Branch or the Nanticoke River.
-------
7, 8, 9, 10,
11, 12, 13
Delaware Water Quality
Standards
7 Del.
Admin. C. §
7401,
Subsections
3-6, 8-10,
11.1, 11.2,
11.3, 11.4,
11.6, 12
Applicable
Standards are established in order to
regulate the discharge into state waters in
order to maintain the integrity of the
water.
Applicable because the groundwater management
system will most likely discharge to surface water
(the final discharge point will be determined in
design).
-------
APPENDIX C
RISK ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment
Table of Contents
ATTACHMENT 1: HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT DATA SETS
Table A1-1 Selection of Exposure Pathways
Table A1-2 Samples Used Within HHRA - Summary
ATTACHMENT 2: HUMAN HEALTH IDENTIFICATION OF CONSTITUENTS OF INTEREST
Table
A2-1
Table
A2-2
Table
A2-3
Table
A2-4
Table
A2-5
Table
A2-6
Table
A2-7
Table
A2-8
Table
A2-9
Table
A2-10
Table
A2-11
Table
A2-12
Table
A2-13
Table
A2-14
Occurrence, Distribution
OU2; Groundwater, Wei
Occurrence, Distribution
OU2; Groundwater, Wei
Occurrence, Distribution
OU2; Groundwater, Wei
Occurrence, Distribution
OU2; Groundwater, Wei
Occurrence, Distribution
OU2; Groundwater, Wei
Occurrence, Distribution
OU2; Groundwater, Wei
Occurrence, Distribution
OU2; Groundwater, Wei
Occurrence, Distribution
OU2; Groundwater, Wei
Occurrence, Distribution
OU2; Groundwater, Wei
Occurrence, Distribution
OU2; Groundwater, Wei
Occurrence, Distribution
OU2; Groundwater, Wei
Occurrence, Distribution
OU2; Groundwater, Wei
Occurrence, Distribution
OU2; Groundwater, Wei
Surrogate Toxicity Used
and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact ¦
0124)
and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact ¦
0155)
and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact ¦
0170)
and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact ¦
0173)
and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact ¦
0176)
and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact ¦
0182)
and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact ¦
0197)
and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact ¦
0212)
and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact ¦
0275)
and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact ¦
0500)
and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact ¦
0501)
and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact ¦
0510)
and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact ¦
0527)
within Human Health Risk Assessment
ATTACHMENT 3: HUMAN HEALTH EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS
Human Health Exposure Point Concentration Summary
Table A3-1 Exposure Point Concentration Summary (Direct Contact - Groundwater)
Table A3-2 Exposure Point Concentration Summary (Vapor Intrusion - Groundwater)
Table A3-3 Residential VISL Model Input Values for Vapor Intrusion from Groundwater
ATTACHMENT 4:
Values Used for Daily Intake and Dermally Absorbed Dose Calculations: Reasonable Maximum
Exposure
Reasonable Maximum Exposure: Incidental Ingestion and Dermal Absorption of
Table A4-1 Groundwater
Reasonable Maximum Exposure: Inhalation of Vapors from Groundwater to Indoor Air
Table A4-2 | (Shower/Vapor Intrusion)
Page 1 of 5
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment
Table of Contents
Environmental Transport and Fate Models
Table A4-3 Dermal Worksheet for Groundwater (Potable Use)
Table A4-4 Modeled Groundwater-to-Vapor Concentrations while Showering
Lead Exposure Modeling Results
Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic (IEUBK) Model Results, Lead in Groundwater,
Table A4-5 Child Resident, Residential Well 0155 Tapwater Results
Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic (IEUBK) Model Results, Lead in Groundwater,
Table A4-6 Child Resident, Residential Well 0176 Tapwater Results
Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic (IEUBK) Model Results, Lead in Groundwater,
Table A4-7 Child Resident, Residential Well 0212 Tapwater Results
ATTACHMENTS: HUMAN HEALTH TOXICITY ASSESSMENT AND RISK CHARACTERIZATION
CALCULATIONS
Cancer and Non-Cancer Toxicity Data
Table A5-1
Table A5-2
Table A6-1
Table A6-2
Non-Cancer Toxicity Data - Oral/Dermal
Non-Cancer Toxicity Data - Inhalation
Cancer Toxicity Data - Oral/Dermal
Cancer Toxicity Data - Inhalation
Calculation of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards: Reasonable Maximum
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Exposure
Table
A7-1
Table
A7-2
Table
A7-3
Table
A7-4
Table
A7-5
Table
A7-6
Table
A7-7
Table
A7-8
Table
A7-9
Table
A7-10
Table
A7-11
Table
A7-12
Table
A7-13
Table
A7-14
Table
A7-15
Groundwater (Vapor
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Groundwater (Vapor
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Groundwater (Vapor
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Groundwater (Vapor
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Groundwater (Vapor
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Groundwater (Vapor
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Groundwater (Vapor
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Groundwater (Vapor
Groundwater (Vapor
Groundwater (Vapor
Groundwater (Vapor
Groundwater (Vapor
Groundwater (Vapor
Groundwater (Vapor
Groundwater (Vapor
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0124)
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0124)
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0124)
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0155)
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0155)
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0155)
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0170)
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0170)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0170)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0173)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0173)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0173)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0176)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0176)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0176)
Page 2 of 5
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment
Table of Contents
Table
A7-16
Table
A7-17
Table
A7-18
Table
A7-19
Table
A7-20
Table
A7-21
Table
A7-22
Table
A7-23
Table
A7-24
Table
A7-25
Table
A7-26
Table
A7-27
Table
A7-28
Table
A7-29
Table
A7-30
Table
A7-31
Table
A7-32
Table
A7-33
Table
A7-34
Table
A7-35
Table
A7-36
Table
A7-37
Table
A7-38
Table
A7-39
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Groundwater (Vapor
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Groundwater (Vapor
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Groundwater (Vapor
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Groundwater (Vapor
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Groundwater (Vapor
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Groundwater (Vapor
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Groundwater (Vapor
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Groundwater (Vapor
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Groundwater (Vapor
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Groundwater (Vapor
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Groundwater (Vapor
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Groundwater (Vapor
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Groundwater (Vapor
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Groundwater (Vapor
Groundwater (Vapor
Groundwater (Vapor
Groundwater (Vapor
Groundwater (Vapor
Groundwater (Vapor
Groundwater (Vapor
Groundwater (Vapor
Groundwater (Vapor
Groundwater (Vapor
Groundwater (Vapor
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0182)
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0182)
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0182)
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0197)
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0197)
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0197)
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0212)
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0212)
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0212)
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0275)
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0275)
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0275)
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0500)
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0500)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0500)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0501)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0501)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0501)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0510)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0510)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0510)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0527)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0527)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0527)
Summary of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards for Constituents of Interest:
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Current/Future On-Sifr
Table A9-1 Groundwater (Vapor
Current/Future On-Sifr
Table A9-2 Groundwater (Vapor
e Resident (Child) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0124)
e Resident (Adult) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0124)
Page 3 of 5
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment
Table of Contents
Table
A9-3
Table
A9-4
Table
A9-5
Table
A9-6
Table
A9-7
Table
A9-8
Table
A9-9
Table
A9-10
Table
A9-11
Table
A9-12
Table
A9-13
Table
A9-14
Table
A9-15
Table
A9-16
Table
A9-17
Table
A9-18
Table
A9-19
Table
A9-20
Table
A9-21
Table
A9-22
Table
A9-23
Table
A9-24
Table
A9-25
Table
A9-26
Table
A9-27
Table
A9-28
Table
A9-29
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Groundwater (Vapor
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Groundwater (Vapor
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Groundwater (Vapor
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Groundwater (Vapor
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Groundwater (Vapor
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Groundwater (Vapor
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Groundwater (Vapor
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Groundwater (Vapor
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Groundwater (Vapor
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Groundwater (Vapor
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Groundwater (Vapor
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Groundwater (Vapor
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Groundwater (Vapor
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Groundwater (Vapor
Groundwater (Vapor
Groundwater (Vapor
Groundwater (Vapor
Groundwater (Vapor
Groundwater (Vapor
Groundwater (Vapor
Groundwater (Vapor
Groundwater (Vapor
Groundwater (Vapor
Groundwater (Vapor
Groundwater (Vapor
Groundwater (Vapor
Groundwater (Vapor
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0124)
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0155)
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0155)
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0155)
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0170)
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0170)
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0170)
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0173)
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0173)
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0173)
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0176)
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0176)
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0176)
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0182)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0182)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0182)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0197)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0197)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0197)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0212)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0212)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0212)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0275)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0275)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0275)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0500)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
ntrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0500)
Page 4 of 5
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment
Table of Contents
Table
A9-30
Table
A9-31
Table
A9-32
Table
A9-33
Table
A9-34
Table
A9-35
Table
A9-36
Table
A9-37
Table
A9-38
Table
A9-39
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0500)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0501)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0501)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0501)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0510)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0510)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0510)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0527)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0527)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use),
Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion); Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0527)
Page 5 of 5
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment
This Page Intentionally Blank
AECOM
-------
Attachment 1
Human Health Risk Assessment Data Sets
-------
Human Health Risk Assessment
This Page Intentionally Blank
AECOM
-------
Table A1-1
Selection of Exposure Pathways
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario
Timeframe
Medium
Exposure
Medium
Exposure Point
Receptor Population
Receptor
Age
Exposure Route
Type ot
Analysis
Rationale for Selection or Exclusion of Exposure Pathway
Receptor may ingest groundwater as a source of tap water.
Child
Quant
Receptor may ingest groundwater as a source of tap water.
Child/Adult
Quant
i ne cancer risK estimates tor tne aauit resiaent years; ana cnna resident (b years; are
added together (26 years) to address lifetime exposure to groundwater. The non-cancer
hazard evaluations are treated separately for child and adult resident.
OU2 Resident
Dermal
Adult
Quant
Receptor may come into contact with groundwater (tap water).
Child
Quant
Receptor may come into contact with groundwater (tap water).
Child/Adult
Quant
i ne cancer risK estimates tor tne aauit resiaent years; ana cnna resiaent (b years; are
added together (26 years) to address lifetime exposure to groundwater. The non-cancer
hazard evaluations are treated separately for child and adult resident.
Indoor Air
Groundwater at OU2
OU2 Resident
Inhalation
Adult
Quant
Receptor may inhale VOCs from groundwater via vapor intrusion into residence.
Child
Quant
Receptor may inhale VOCs from groundwater via vapor intrusion into residence.
Child/Adult
Quant
i ne cancer risK estimates tor tne aauit resiaent years; ana cnna resiaent (b years; are
added together (26 years) to address lifetime exposure to groundwater. The non-cancer
hazard evaluations are treated separately for child and adult resident.
Shower Air
Groundwater at OU2
OU2 Resident
Inhalation
Adult
Quant
Receptor may inhale vapors while showering since groundwater is used as a tap water
source.
Child
Quant
Receptor may inhale vapors while bathing since groundwater is used as a tap water
source.
Child/Adult
Quant
i ne cancer risK estimates tor tne aauit resiaent years; ana cnna resiaent (b years; are
added together (26 years) to address lifetime exposure to groundwater. The non-cancer
hazard evaluations are treated separately for child and adult resident.
Quant = Quantitative; VOC = volatile organic compound
-------
Table A1-2
Samples Used Within HHRA - Summary
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Medium
Exposure
Area
Sample
Location
Sample
Name
Type
Date
Vertical
Unit
Result Count
VOC
SVOC
PFAS
PCB
DIOX
TMET
CYANIDE
TOTAL
WP
OU2
0155
C0BF8
N
9/20/2021
-
55
67
4
2
1
21
1
151
WP
OU2
0510
C0BF6
N
9/20/2021
-
55
67
4
2
1
21
1
151
WP
OU2
0173
C0BG1
N
9/21/2021
-
55
67
4
2
1
21
1
151
WP
OU2
0176
C0BG2
N
9/21/2021
-
55
67
3
2
1
21
1
150
WP
OU2
0501
C0BH8
N
9/22/2021
-
54
19
4
2
1
21
1
102
WP
OU2
0124
C0BK1
N
9/27/2021
-
55
68
4
2
1
21
1
152
WP
OU2
0182
C0BL8
N
9/29/2021
-
55
68
4
2
1
21
1
152
WP
OU2
0197
C0BM1
N
9/30/2021
-
55
68
4
2
1
21
1
152
WP
OU2
0275
C0BN3
N
10/5/2021
-
55
68
4
2
1
21
1
152
WP
OU2
0500
C0BM9
N
10/5/2021
-
55
68
3
2
1
21
1
151
WP
OU2
0527
C0BN2
N
10/5/2021
-
55
68
4
2
1
21
1
152
WP
OU2
0170
C0BN7
N
10/6/2021
-
55
68
4
2
1
21
1
152
WP
OU2
0212
C0BP1
N
10/7/2021
-
55
68
4
2
1
21
1
152
Notes:
FD = Field Duplicate Sample PFAS = Perfluorinated Compounds
N = Primary Sample PCB = Polychlorinated Biphenyls
WP = Potable Water DIOX = Dioxins/Furans
VOC = Volatile Organic Compounds TMET = Total Metals
SVOC = Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds
-------
Attachment 2
Human Health Risk-Based Screening Results
-------
Table A2-1
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0124)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0124
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
V
71-55-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.075-0.075
0.075
MDL
800
RSL
893
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
V
79-34-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.05-0.05
0.05
MDL
0.076
RSL
4.18
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
V
79-00-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.042-0.042
0.042
MDL
0.041
RSL
0.779
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane (Freon 113)
V
76-13-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.099-0.099
0.099
MDL
1000
RSL
28.5
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1-Dichloroethane
V
75-34-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.058-0.058
0.058
MDL
2.8
RSL
9.09
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1-Dichloroethene
V
75-35-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.064-0.064
0.064
MDL
28
RSL
22.7
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
V
87-61-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.076-0.076
0.076
MDL
0.7
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
V
96-18-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.077-0.077
0.077
MDL
0.00075
RSL
2.89
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
V
120-82-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.068-0.068
0.068
MDL
0.4
RSL
4.97
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
V
95-63-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.051 -0.051
0.051
MDL
5.6
RSL
33
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
V
96-12-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.14-0.14
0.14
MDL
0.00033
RSL
0.0381
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2-Dibromoethane
V
106-93-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.052-0.052
0.052
MDL
0.0075
RSL
0.221
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
V
95-50-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.045-0.045
0.045
MDL
30
RSL
351
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2-Dichloroethane
V
107-06-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.079-0.079
0.079
MDL
0.17
RSL
2.74
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2-Dichloropropane
V
78-87-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.069-0.069
0.069
MDL
0.82
RSL
4.44
No
No
MDL< SL
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
V
108-67-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.067-0.067
0.067
MDL
6
RSL
23.2
No
No
MDL< SL
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
V
541-73-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.071 -0.071
0.071
MDL
30
*
RSL
351
No
No
MDL< SL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
V
106-46-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.047-0.047
0.047
MDL
0.48
RSL
3.42
No
No
MDL< SL
1,4-Dioxane
V
123-91-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.9-0.9
0.9
MDL
0.46
RSL
3570
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2-Butanone (MEK)
V
78-93-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
lo
I
lo
1.5
MDL
560
RSL
274000
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Hexanone
V
591-78-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.68-0.68
0.68
MDL
3.8
RSL
1060
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
V
108-10-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
O
I
o
0.71
MDL
630
RSL
70200
No
No
MDL< SL
Acetone
V
67-64-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
1800
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzene
V
71-43-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.085-0.085
0.085
MDL
0.46
RSL
1.92
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromochloromethane
V
74-97-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.064-0.064
0.064
MDL
8.3
RSL
83.9
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromodichloromethane
V
75-27-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.062-0.062
0.062
MDL
0.13
RSL
1.08
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromoform
V
75-25-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.095-0.095
0.095
MDL
3.3
RSL
152
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromomethane
V
74-83-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.058-0.058
0.058
MDL
0.75
RSL
1.98
No
No
MDL< SL
Carbon disulfide
V
75-15-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.092-0.092
0.092
MDL
81
RSL
145
No
No
MDL< SL
Carbon tetrachloride
V
56-23-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.086-0.086
0.086
MDL
0.46
RSL
0.499
No
No
MDL< SL
Chlorobenzene
V
108-90-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.064-0.064
0.064
MDL
7.8
RSL
51.9
No
No
MDL< SL
Chloroethane
V
75-00-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.074-0.074
0.074
MDL
830
RSL
1050
No
No
MDL< SL
Chloroform
V
67-66-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.079-0.079
0.079
MDL
0.22
RSL
0.972
No
No
MDL< SL
Chloromethane
V
74-87-3
0.17
J
0.17
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.082-0.082
0.17
MDC
19
RSL
28.9
No
No
MDC < SL
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
V
156-59-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.075-0.075
0.075
MDL
3.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
V
10061-01-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.069-0.069
0.069
MDL
0.47
*
RSL
6.04
No
No
MDL< SL
Cyclohexane
V
110-82-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.065-0.065
0.065
MDL
1300
RSL
123
No
No
MDL< SL
Dibromochloromethane
V
124-48-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.073-0.073
0.073
MDL
0.87
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dichlorodifluoromethane
V
75-71-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.12-0.12
0.12
MDL
20
RSL
0.815
No
No
MDL< SL
Ethylbenzene
V
100-41-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.079-0.079
0.079
MDL
1.5
RSL
4.45
No
No
MDL< SL
-------
Table A2-1
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0124)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0124
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
Isopropylbenzene
V
98-82-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.076-0.076
0.076
MDL
45
RSL
121
No
No
MDL< SL
m,p-Xylene
V
179601-23-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.083-0.083
0.083
MDL
19
*
RSL
45.5
No
No
MDL< SL
Methyl Acetate
V
79-20-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.11 -0.11
0.11
MDL
2000
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Methyl Tert Butyl Ether
V
1634-04-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.053-0.053
0.053
MDL
14
RSL
533
No
No
MDL< SL
Methylcyclohexane
V
108-87-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.08-0.08
0.08
MDL
1300
*
RSL
123
No
No
MDL< SL
Methylene chloride
V
75-09-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.053-0.053
0.053
MDL
11
RSL
555
No
No
MDL< SL
o-Xylene
V
95-47-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.075-0.075
0.075
MDL
19
RSL
63.3
No
No
MDL< SL
Styrene
V
100-42-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.082-0.082
0.082
MDL
120
RSL
1210
No
No
MDL< SL
Tetrachloroethene
V
127-18-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.083-0.083
0.083
MDL
4.1
RSL
7.25
No
No
MDL< SL
Toluene
V
108-88-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.077-0.077
0.077
MDL
110
RSL
2390
No
No
MDL< SL
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
V
156-60-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.081 -0.081
0.081
MDL
6.8
RSL
12.9
No
No
MDL< SL
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
V
10061-02-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.07-0.07
0.07
MDL
0.47
*
RSL
6.04
No
No
MDL< SL
Trichloroethene
V
79-01-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.062-0.062
0.062
MDL
0.28
RSL
0.632
No
No
MDL< SL
Trichlorofluoromethane
V
75-69-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.11 -0.11
0.11
MDL
520
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Vinyl chloride
V
75-01-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.07-0.07
0.07
MDL
0.019
RSL
0.164
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs)
1,1 '-Biphenyl
V
92-52-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.9-1.9
1.9
MDL
0.083
RSL
4.71
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
V
95-94-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
0.017
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1-Methylnaphthalene
V
90-12-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0055-0.0055
0.0055
MDL
1.1
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
58-90-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
24
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
95-95-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
120
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
88-06-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.7-1.7
1.7
MDL
1.2
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2,4-Dichlorophenol
120-83-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
4.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4-Dimethylphenol
105-67-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
36
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4-Dinitrophenol
51-28-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.98-0.98
0.98
MDL
3.9
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
121-14-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.2-2.2
2.2
MDL
0.24
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
606-20-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.9-1.9
1.9
MDL
0.049
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2-Chloronaphthalene
V
91-58-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
75
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Chlorophenol
V
95-57-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
9.1
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Methylnaphthalene
V
91-57-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0066-0.0066
0.0066
MDL
3.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Methylphenol
95-48-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.6-2.6
2.6
MDL
93
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Nitroaniline
88-74-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
"3-
oo
I
oo
3.4
MDL
19
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Nitrophenol
88-75-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.7-2.7
2.7
MDL
0.2
*
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
91-94-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.7-1.7
1.7
MDL
0.13
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
3-Nitroaniline
99-09-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.67-0.67
0.67
MDL
19
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
534-52-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
0.15
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
V
101-55-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
4
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Chloro-3-methyl phenol
59-50-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
140
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Chloroaniline
106-47-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
4.6-4.6
4.6
MDL
0.37
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
V
7005-72-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.4-2.4
2.4
MDL
4
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Methylphenol
106-44-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.6-2.6
2.6
MDL
37
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
-------
Table A2-1
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0124)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0124
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
4-Nitroaniline
100-01-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.85-0.85
0.85
MDL
3.8
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Nitrophenol
100-02-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.4-2.4
2.4
MDL
0.2
*
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Acenaphthene
V
83-32-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0061 -0.0061
0.0061
MDL
53
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Acenaphthylene
V
208-96-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0069-0.0069
0.0069
MDL
53
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Acetophenone
V
98-86-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.2-2.2
2.2
MDL
190
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Anthracene
V
120-12-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.011 -0.011
0.011
MDL
180
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Atrazine
1912-24-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.48-0.48
0.48
MDL
0.3
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Benzaldehyde
V
100-52-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.5-2.5
2.5
MDL
19
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(a)anthracene
V
56-55-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0094-0.0094
0.0094
MDL
0.03
RSL
62.3
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(a)pyrene
50-32-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.017-0.017
0.017
MDL
0.025
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
205-99-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0082-0.0082
0.0082
MDL
0.25
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
V
191-24-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0069-0.0069
0.0069
MDL
12
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
207-08-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0041 -0.0041
0.0041
MDL
2.5
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
111-91-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.9-2.9
2.9
MDL
5.9
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
V
111-44-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
0.014
RSL
17
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
V
108-60-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
71
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
117-81-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.82-0.82
0.82
MDL
5.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Butyl benzyl phthalate
85-68-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.4-1.4
1.4
MDL
16
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Caprolactam
105-60-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.8-1.8
1.8
MDL
990
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Carbazole
V
86-74-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
3.2-3.2
3.2
MDL
29
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Chrysene
218-01-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0054-0.0054
0.0054
MDL
25
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dibenzo(a, h)anthracene
53-70-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0059-0.0059
0.0059
MDL
0.025
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dibenzofuran
V
132-64-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.2-2.2
2.2
MDL
0.79
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Diethyl phthalate
84-66-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
1500
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dimethyl phthalate
131-11-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
1500
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Di-n-butyl phthalate
84-74-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.6-1.6
1.6
MDL
90
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Di-n-octyl phthalate
117-84-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.64-0.64
0.64
MDL
20
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Fluoranthene
206-44-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.012-0.012
0.012
MDL
80
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Fluorene
V
86-73-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0072-0.0072
0.0072
MDL
29
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Hexachlorobenzene
V
118-74-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.9-1.9
1.9
MDL
0.0098
RSL
0.133
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
Hexachlorobutadiene
V
87-68-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.7-1.7
1.7
MDL
0.14
RSL
0.414
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
V
77-47-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.6-1.6
1.6
MDL
0.041
RSL
0.0786
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
Hexachloroethane
V
67-72-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.6-2.6
2.6
MDL
0.33
RSL
2.29
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
193-39-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0069-0.0069
0.0069
MDL
0.25
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Isophorone
78-59-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.8-1.8
1.8
MDL
78
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Naphthalene
V
91-20-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0077-0.0077
0.0077
MDL
0.12
RSL
6.29
No
No
MDL< SL
Nitrobenzene
V
98-95-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.5-2.5
2.5
MDL
0.14
RSL
99.3
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
621-64-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.4-2.4
2.4
MDL
0.011
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
86-30-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
3.6-3.6
3.6
MDL
12
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Pentachlorophenol
87-86-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.024-0.024
0.024
MDL
0.041
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Phenanthrene
V
85-01-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0087-0.0087
0.0087
MDL
180
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
-------
Table A2-1
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0124)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0124
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
Phenol
108-95-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.5-2.5
2.5
MDL
580
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Pyrene
V
129-00-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.014-0.014
0.014
MDL
12
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
DIOX
Total PCDD/F TEQ (Mammal) V TEQ-M-DF N/A N/A |jg/L 0/1 0% N/A N/A - 0.00000012 * RSL 3.61 E-05 No No No values for dioxin TEQ
PCB
Total PCB TEQ (Mammal)
V
TEQ-M-PCB
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
N/A
N/A
-
0.00000012
*
RSL
3.61 E-05
No
No
No values for dioxin TEQ
Total PCB Congener
V
TPCB_CON
0.000051
J
0.000051
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
N/A
0.000051
MDC
0.044
*
RSL
1.65
No
No
MDC < SL
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA)
375-95-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.002-0.002
0.002
MDL
0.0059
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS)
355-46-4
0.00056
J
0.00056
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.002-0.002
0.00056
MDC
0.039
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS)
375-73-5
0.0058
0.0058
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.00039-0.00039
0.0058
MDC
0.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
1763-23-1
0.011
0.011
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.00039-0.00039
0.011
MDC
0.004
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
335-67-1
0.0012
J
0.0012
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.00039-0.00039
0.0012
MDC
0.006
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Total Metals
Aluminum
7429-90-5
130
130
mq/l
1/1
100%
4-4
130
MDC
2000
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Antimony
7440-36-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.32-0.32
0.32
MDL
0.78
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Arsenic
7440-38-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.33-0.33
0.33
MDL
0.052
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Barium
7440-39-3
480
480
mq/l
1/1
100%
1.9-1.9
480
MDC
380
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Beryllium
7440-41-7
2
2
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.17-0.17
2
MDC
2.5
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Cadmium
7440-43-9
0.16
J
0.16
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.14-0.14
0.16
MDC
0.18
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Calcium
7440-70-2
8400
8400
mq/l
1/1
100%
120-120
8400
MDC
Nutrient
N/A
Nutrient
No
No
Classified as an essential nutrient
Chromium, Total
7440-47-3
0.51
J
0.51
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.32-0.32
0.51
MDC
2200
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Chromium, Hexavalent
18540-29-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1-1
1
MDL
0.035
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Cobalt
7440-48-4
30
30
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.19-0.19
30
MDC
0.6
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Copper
7440-50-8
250
250
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.4-0.4
250
MDC
80
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Iron
7439-89-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
54-54
54
MDL
1400
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Lead
7439-92-1
9.8
J-
9.8
J-
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.21 -0.21
9.8
MDC
15
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Manganese
7439-96-5
190
190
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.17-0.17
190
MDC
43
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Mercury
7439-97-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.06-0.06
0.06
MDL
0.2
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Nickel
7440-02-0
8
8
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.2-0.2
8
MDC
39
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Selenium
7782-49-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.2-1.2
1.2
MDL
10
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Silver
7440-22-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.18-0.18
0.18
MDL
9.4
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Thallium
7440-28-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.23-0.23
0.23
MDL
0.02
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Vanadium
7440-62-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.2-1.2
1.2
MDL
8.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Zinc
7440-66-6
140
140
mq/l
1/1
100%
1.6-1.6
140
MDC
600
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Total Cyanide
Cyanide V 57-12-5 4.6 J 4.6 J |jg/L 1/1 100% 2.6-2.6 4.6 MDC 0.15 RSL 20.1 No Yes MDC>SL
Notes:
% = Percent
AL = Action Level
-------
Table A2-1
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0124)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0124
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
CASRN = Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number
COPC = Chemical of Potential Concern
DSA = Data Sensitivity Analysis
HAL = Health Advisory Level
J = Indicates an estimated value
J- = The result is an estimated quantity, but the result may be biased low.
MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level
MDC = Maximum Detected Concentration
N/A = Not Applicable
ND = Non-Detect or Not Detected
"PFOA and PFOS Combined" = Combined total of the detected concentrations of PFOA and PFOS (non-detect results were not included in the summation).
RL = Reporting Limit
RSL = Regional Screening Level
|jg/L = micrograms per liter
USEPA = United States Environmental Protection Agency
(1) "V" indicates that the chemical is volatile.
(2) Groundwater data screened against USEPA Tap Water RSLs, last updated May 2022 (TR = 1E-6, THQ = 0.1).
(3) An asterisk,"*", indicates surrogate toxicity information was used to derive a Screening Level (see Table A2-14).
(4) Groundwater data screened against USEPA Residential Groundwater VI SLs, last updated May 2022 (TR= 1E-6, THQ = 0.1). Site-specific, system temperature was set to 20.5 Celsius (average of recorded temperatures taken infield).
(6) Lead is compared to the EPA tap water RSL of 15 |jg/L, which represents the 90th percentile concentration of lead found in tap water samples collected nationwide (Lead and Copper Rule, 56 Federal Register 26460-26564, dated June 7,1991) and
is not a risk-based number, but rather an action level.
-------
Table A2-2
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0155)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0155
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
V
71-55-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.075-0.075
0.075
MDL
800
RSL
893
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
V
79-34-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.05-0.05
0.05
MDL
0.076
RSL
4.18
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
V
79-00-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.042-0.042
0.042
MDL
0.041
RSL
0.779
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane (Freon 113)
V
76-13-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.099-0.099
0.099
MDL
1000
RSL
28.5
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1-Dichloroethane
V
75-34-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.058-0.058
0.058
MDL
2.8
RSL
9.09
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1-Dichloroethene
V
75-35-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.064-0.064
0.064
MDL
28
RSL
22.7
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
V
87-61-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.076-0.076
0.076
MDL
0.7
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
V
96-18-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.077-0.077
0.077
MDL
0.00075
RSL
2.89
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
V
120-82-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.068-0.068
0.068
MDL
0.4
RSL
4.97
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
V
95-63-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.051 -0.051
0.051
MDL
5.6
RSL
33
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
V
96-12-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.14-0.14
0.14
MDL
0.00033
RSL
0.0381
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2-Dibromoethane
V
106-93-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.052-0.052
0.052
MDL
0.0075
RSL
0.221
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
V
95-50-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.045-0.045
0.045
MDL
30
RSL
351
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2-Dichloroethane
V
107-06-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.079-0.079
0.079
MDL
0.17
RSL
2.74
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2-Dichloropropane
V
78-87-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.069-0.069
0.069
MDL
0.82
RSL
4.44
No
No
MDL< SL
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
V
108-67-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.067-0.067
0.067
MDL
6
RSL
23.2
No
No
MDL< SL
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
V
541-73-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.071 -0.071
0.071
MDL
30
*
RSL
351
No
No
MDL< SL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
V
106-46-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.047-0.047
0.047
MDL
0.48
RSL
3.42
No
No
MDL< SL
1,4-Dioxane
V
123-91-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.88-0.88
0.88
MDL
0.46
RSL
3570
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2-Butanone (MEK)
V
78-93-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
lo
I
lo
1.5
MDL
560
RSL
274000
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Hexanone
V
591-78-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.68-0.68
0.68
MDL
3.8
RSL
1060
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
V
108-10-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
O
I
o
0.71
MDL
630
RSL
70200
No
No
MDL< SL
Acetone
V
67-64-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
1800
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzene
V
71-43-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.085-0.085
0.085
MDL
0.46
RSL
1.92
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromochloromethane
V
74-97-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.064-0.064
0.064
MDL
8.3
RSL
83.9
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromodichloromethane
V
75-27-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.062-0.062
0.062
MDL
0.13
RSL
1.08
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromoform
V
75-25-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.095-0.095
0.095
MDL
3.3
RSL
152
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromomethane
V
74-83-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.058-0.058
0.058
MDL
0.75
RSL
1.98
No
No
MDL< SL
Carbon disulfide
V
75-15-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.092-0.092
0.092
MDL
81
RSL
145
No
No
MDL< SL
Carbon tetrachloride
V
56-23-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.086-0.086
0.086
MDL
0.46
RSL
0.499
No
No
MDL< SL
Chlorobenzene
V
108-90-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.064-0.064
0.064
MDL
7.8
RSL
51.9
No
No
MDL< SL
Chloroethane
V
75-00-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.074-0.074
0.074
MDL
830
RSL
1050
No
No
MDL< SL
Chloroform
V
67-66-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.079-0.079
0.079
MDL
0.22
RSL
0.972
No
No
MDL< SL
Chloromethane
V
74-87-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.082-0.082
0.082
MDL
19
RSL
28.9
No
No
MDL< SL
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
V
156-59-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.075-0.075
0.075
MDL
3.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
V
10061-01-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.069-0.069
0.069
MDL
0.47
*
RSL
6.04
No
No
MDL< SL
Cyclohexane
V
110-82-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.065-0.065
0.065
MDL
1300
RSL
123
No
No
MDL< SL
Dibromochloromethane
V
124-48-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.073-0.073
0.073
MDL
0.87
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dichlorodifluoromethane
V
75-71-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.12-0.12
0.12
MDL
20
RSL
0.815
No
No
MDL< SL
Ethylbenzene
V
100-41-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.079-0.079
0.079
MDL
1.5
RSL
4.45
No
No
MDL< SL
-------
Table A2-2
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0155)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0155
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
Isopropylbenzene
V
98-82-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.076-0.076
0.076
MDL
45
RSL
121
No
No
MDL< SL
m,p-Xylene
V
179601-23-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.083-0.083
0.083
MDL
19
*
RSL
45.5
No
No
MDL< SL
Methyl Acetate
V
79-20-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.11 -0.11
0.11
MDL
2000
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Methyl Tert Butyl Ether
V
1634-04-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.053-0.053
0.053
MDL
14
RSL
533
No
No
MDL< SL
Methylcyclohexane
V
108-87-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.08-0.08
0.08
MDL
1300
*
RSL
123
No
No
MDL< SL
Methylene chloride
V
75-09-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.053-0.053
0.053
MDL
11
RSL
555
No
No
MDL< SL
o-Xylene
V
95-47-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.075-0.075
0.075
MDL
19
RSL
63.3
No
No
MDL< SL
Styrene
V
100-42-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.082-0.082
0.082
MDL
120
RSL
1210
No
No
MDL< SL
Tetrachloroethene
V
127-18-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.083-0.083
0.083
MDL
4.1
RSL
7.25
No
No
MDL< SL
Toluene
V
108-88-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.077-0.077
0.077
MDL
110
RSL
2390
No
No
MDL< SL
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
V
156-60-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.081 -0.081
0.081
MDL
6.8
RSL
12.9
No
No
MDL< SL
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
V
10061-02-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.07-0.07
0.07
MDL
0.47
*
RSL
6.04
No
No
MDL< SL
Trichloroethene
V
79-01-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.062-0.062
0.062
MDL
0.28
RSL
0.632
No
No
MDL< SL
Trichlorofluoromethane
V
75-69-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.11 -0.11
0.11
MDL
520
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Vinyl chloride
V
75-01-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.07-0.07
0.07
MDL
0.019
RSL
0.164
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs)
1,1 '-Biphenyl
V
92-52-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.9-1.9
1.9
MDL
0.083
RSL
4.71
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
V
95-94-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
0.017
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1-Methylnaphthalene
V
90-12-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0052-0.0052
0.0052
MDL
1.1
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
58-90-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
24
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
95-95-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
120
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
88-06-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.7-1.7
1.7
MDL
1.2
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2,4-Dichlorophenol
120-83-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
4.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4-Dimethylphenol
105-67-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
36
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4-Dinitrophenol
51-28-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.96-0.96
0.96
MDL
3.9
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
121-14-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.2-2.2
2.2
MDL
0.24
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
606-20-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.9-1.9
1.9
MDL
0.049
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2-Chloronaphthalene
V
91-58-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
75
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Chlorophenol
V
95-57-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
9.1
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Methylnaphthalene
V
91-57-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0063-0.0063
0.0063
MDL
3.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Methylphenol
95-48-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.5-2.5
2.5
MDL
93
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Nitroaniline
88-74-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
CO
CO
I
CO
CO
3.3
MDL
19
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Nitrophenol
88-75-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.6-2.6
2.6
MDL
0.2
*
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
91-94-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.7-1.7
1.7
MDL
0.13
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
3-Nitroaniline
99-09-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.66-0.66
0.66
MDL
19
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
534-52-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
0.15
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
V
101-55-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
4
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Chloro-3-methyl phenol
59-50-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
140
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Chloroaniline
106-47-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
4.5-4.5
4.5
MDL
0.37
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
V
7005-72-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.4-2.4
2.4
MDL
4
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Methylphenol
106-44-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.5-2.5
2.5
MDL
37
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
-------
Table A2-2
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0155)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0155
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
4-Nitroaniline
100-01-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.83-0.83
0.83
MDL
3.8
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Nitrophenol
100-02-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.4-2.4
2.4
MDL
0.2
*
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Acenaphthene
V
83-32-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0058-0.0058
0.0058
MDL
53
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Acenaphthylene
V
208-96-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0066-0.0066
0.0066
MDL
53
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Acetophenone
V
98-86-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.2-2.2
2.2
MDL
190
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Anthracene
V
120-12-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.01 -0.01
0.01
MDL
180
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Atrazine
1912-24-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.47-0.47
0.47
MDL
0.3
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Benzaldehyde
V
100-52-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.5-2.5
2.5
MDL
19
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(a)anthracene
V
56-55-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.009-0.009
0.009
MDL
0.03
RSL
62.3
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(a)pyrene
50-32-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.016-0.016
0.016
MDL
0.025
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
205-99-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0078-0.0078
0.0078
MDL
0.25
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
V
191-24-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0066-0.0066
0.0066
MDL
12
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
207-08-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0039-0.0039
0.0039
MDL
2.5
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
111-91-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.8-2.8
2.8
MDL
5.9
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
V
111-44-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
0.014
RSL
17
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
V
108-60-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
71
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
117-81-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.8-0.8
0.8
MDL
5.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Butyl benzyl phthalate
85-68-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.4-1.4
1.4
MDL
16
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Caprolactam
105-60-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.8-1.8
1.8
MDL
990
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Carbazole
V
86-74-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
3.1 -3.1
3.1
MDL
29
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Chrysene
218-01-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0051 -0.0051
0.0051
MDL
25
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dibenzo(a, h)anthracene
53-70-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0056-0.0056
0.0056
MDL
0.025
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dibenzofuran
V
132-64-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.2-2.2
2.2
MDL
0.79
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Diethyl phthalate
84-66-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
1500
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dimethyl phthalate
131-11-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
1500
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Di-n-butyl phthalate
84-74-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.6-1.6
1.6
MDL
90
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Di-n-octyl phthalate
117-84-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.63-0.63
0.63
MDL
20
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Fluoranthene
206-44-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.011 -0.011
0.011
MDL
80
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Fluorene
V
86-73-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0069-0.0069
0.0069
MDL
29
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Hexachlorobenzene
V
118-74-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.9-1.9
1.9
MDL
0.0098
RSL
0.133
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
Hexachlorobutadiene
V
87-68-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.7-1.7
1.7
MDL
0.14
RSL
0.414
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
Hexachloroethane
V
67-72-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.5-2.5
2.5
MDL
0.33
RSL
2.29
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
193-39-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0066-0.0066
0.0066
MDL
0.25
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Isophorone
78-59-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.8-1.8
1.8
MDL
78
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Naphthalene
V
91-20-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0073-0.0073
0.0073
MDL
0.12
RSL
6.29
No
No
MDL< SL
Nitrobenzene
V
98-95-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.5-2.5
2.5
MDL
0.14
RSL
99.3
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
621-64-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.4-2.4
2.4
MDL
0.011
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
86-30-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
LO
CO
I
LO
CO
3.5
MDL
12
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Pentachlorophenol
87-86-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.023-0.023
0.023
MDL
0.041
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Phenanthrene
V
85-01-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0083-0.0083
0.0083
MDL
180
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Phenol
108-95-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.5-2.5
2.5
MDL
580
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
-------
Table A2-2
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0155)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0155
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
Pyrene V
129-00-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1 0%
0.013-0.013
0.013 MDL
12
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
DIOX
Total PCDD/F TEQ (Mammal) V TEQ-M-DF N/A N/A |jg/L 0/1 0% N/A N/A - 0.00000012 * RSL 3.61 E-05 No No No values for dioxin TEQ
PCB
Total PCB TEQ (Mammal)
V
TEQ-M-PCB
2.6E-10
2.6E-10
mq/l
1/1
100%
N/A
2.6E-10
MDC
0.00000012
*
RSL
3.61 E-05
No
No
MDC < SL
Total PCB Congener
V
TPCB_CON
0.00013
J
0.00013
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
N/A
0.00013
MDC
0.044
*
RSL
1.65
No
No
MDC < SL
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA)
375-95-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0017-0.0017
0.0017
MDL
0.0059
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS)
355-46-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0017-0.0017
0.0017
MDL
0.039
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS)
375-73-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.00035-0.00035
0.00035
MDL
0.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
1763-23-1
0.00059
J
0.00059
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.00035-0.00035
0.00059
MDC
0.004
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
335-67-1
0.0012
J
0.0012
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.00035-0.00035
0.0012
MDC
0.006
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Total Metals
Aluminum
7429-90-5
180
180
mq/l
1/1
100%
4-4
180
MDC
2000
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Antimony
7440-36-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.32-0.32
0.32
MDL
0.78
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Arsenic
7440-38-2
0.38
J
0.38
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.33-0.33
0.38
MDC
0.052
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Barium
7440-39-3
1100
1100
mq/l
1/1
100%
1.9-1.9
1100
MDC
380
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Beryllium
7440-41-7
1.5
1.5
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.17-0.17
1.5
MDC
2.5
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Cadmium
7440-43-9
0.33
J
0.33
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.14-0.14
0.33
MDC
0.18
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Calcium
7440-70-2
8700
8700
mq/l
1/1
100%
120-120
8700
MDC
Nutrient
N/A
Nutrient
No
No
Classified as an essential nutrient
Chromium, Total
7440-47-3
0.73
J
0.73
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.32-0.32
0.73
MDC
2200
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Chromium, Hexavalent
18540-29-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1-1
1
MDL
0.035
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Cobalt
7440-48-4
15
15
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.19-0.19
15
MDC
0.6
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Copper
7440-50-8
140
140
mq/l
1/1
100%
"3-
O
I
o
140
MDC
80
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Iron
7439-89-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
54-54
54
MDL
1400
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Lead
7439-92-1
23
23
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.21 -0.21
23
MDC
15
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Manganese
7439-96-5
120
120
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.17-0.17
120
MDC
43
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Mercury
7439-97-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.06-0.06
0.06
MDL
0.2
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Nickel
7440-02-0
8.8
JB+
8.8
JB+
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.2-0.2
8.8
MDC
39
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Selenium
7782-49-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.2-1.2
1.2
MDL
10
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Silver
7440-22-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.18-0.18
0.18
MDL
9.4
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Thallium
7440-28-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.23-0.23
0.23
MDL
0.02
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Vanadium
7440-62-2
3.1
J
3.1
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
1.2-1.2
3.1
MDC
8.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Zinc
7440-66-6
270
270
mq/l
1/1
100%
1.6-1.6
270
MDC
600
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Total Cyanide
Cyanide V 57-12-5 4.8 J 4.8 J |jg/L 1/1 100% 2.6-2.6 4.8 MDC 0.15 RSL 20.1 No Yes MDC>SL
Notes:
% = Percent
AL = Action Level
CASRN = Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number
-------
Table A2-2
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0155)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0155
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
COPC = Chemical of Potential Concern
DSA = Data Sensitivity Analysis
HAL = Health Advisory Level
J = Indicates an estimated value
MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level
MDC = Maximum Detected Concentration
N/A = Not Applicable
ND = Non-Detect or Not Detected
"PFOA and PFOS Combined" = Combined total of the detected concentrations of PFOA and PFOS (non-detect results were not included in the summation).
RL = Reporting Limit
RSL = Regional Screening Level
|jg/L = micrograms per liter
USEPA = United States Environmental Protection Agency
(1) "V" indicates that the chemical is volatile.
(2) Groundwater data screened against USEPA Tap Water RSLs, last updated May 2022 (TR = 1E-6, THQ = 0.1).
(3) An asterisk,"*", indicates surrogate toxicity information was used to derive a Screening Level (see Table A2-14).
(4) Groundwater data screened against USEPA Residential Groundwater VI SLs, last updated May 2022 (TR= 1E-6, THQ = 0.1). Site-specific, system temperature was set to 20.5 Celsius (average of recorded temperatures taken infield).
(6) Lead is compared to the EPA tap water RSL of 15 |jg/L, which represents the 90th percentile concentration of lead found in tap water samples collected nationwide (Lead and Copper Rule, 56 Federal Register 26460-26564, dated June 7,1991) and
is not a risk-based number, but rather an action level.
-------
Table A2-3
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0170)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0170
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
V
71-55-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.075-0.075
0.075
MDL
800
RSL
893
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
V
79-34-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.05-0.05
0.05
MDL
0.076
RSL
4.18
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
V
79-00-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.042-0.042
0.042
MDL
0.041
RSL
0.779
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane (Freon 113)
V
76-13-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.099-0.099
0.099
MDL
1000
RSL
28.5
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1-Dichloroethane
V
75-34-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.058-0.058
0.058
MDL
2.8
RSL
9.09
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1-Dichloroethene
V
75-35-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.064-0.064
0.064
MDL
28
RSL
22.7
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
V
87-61-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.076-0.076
0.076
MDL
0.7
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
V
96-18-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.077-0.077
0.077
MDL
0.00075
RSL
2.89
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
V
120-82-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.068-0.068
0.068
MDL
0.4
RSL
4.97
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
V
95-63-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.051 -0.051
0.051
MDL
5.6
RSL
33
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
V
96-12-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.14-0.14
0.14
MDL
0.00033
RSL
0.0381
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2-Dibromoethane
V
106-93-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.052-0.052
0.052
MDL
0.0075
RSL
0.221
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
V
95-50-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.045-0.045
0.045
MDL
30
RSL
351
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2-Dichloroethane
V
107-06-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.079-0.079
0.079
MDL
0.17
RSL
2.74
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2-Dichloropropane
V
78-87-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.069-0.069
0.069
MDL
0.82
RSL
4.44
No
No
MDL< SL
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
V
108-67-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.067-0.067
0.067
MDL
6
RSL
23.2
No
No
MDL< SL
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
V
541-73-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.071 -0.071
0.071
MDL
30
*
RSL
351
No
No
MDL< SL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
V
106-46-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.047-0.047
0.047
MDL
0.48
RSL
3.42
No
No
MDL< SL
1,4-Dioxane
V
123-91-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.9-0.9
0.9
MDL
0.46
RSL
3570
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2-Butanone (MEK)
V
78-93-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
lo
I
lo
1.5
MDL
560
RSL
274000
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Hexanone
V
591-78-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.68-0.68
0.68
MDL
3.8
RSL
1060
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
V
108-10-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
O
I
o
0.71
MDL
630
RSL
70200
No
No
MDL< SL
Acetone
V
67-64-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
1800
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzene
V
71-43-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.085-0.085
0.085
MDL
0.46
RSL
1.92
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromochloromethane
V
74-97-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.064-0.064
0.064
MDL
8.3
RSL
83.9
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromodichloromethane
V
75-27-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.062-0.062
0.062
MDL
0.13
RSL
1.08
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromoform
V
75-25-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.095-0.095
0.095
MDL
3.3
RSL
152
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromomethane
V
74-83-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.058-0.058
0.058
MDL
0.75
RSL
1.98
No
No
MDL< SL
Carbon disulfide
V
75-15-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.092-0.092
0.092
MDL
81
RSL
145
No
No
MDL< SL
Carbon tetrachloride
V
56-23-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.086-0.086
0.086
MDL
0.46
RSL
0.499
No
No
MDL< SL
Chlorobenzene
V
108-90-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.064-0.064
0.064
MDL
7.8
RSL
51.9
No
No
MDL< SL
Chloroethane
V
75-00-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.074-0.074
0.074
MDL
830
RSL
1050
No
No
MDL< SL
Chloroform
V
67-66-3
1.4
1.4
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.079-0.079
1.4
MDC
0.22
RSL
0.972
Yes
Yes
MDC > SL
Chloromethane
V
74-87-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.082-0.082
0.082
MDL
19
RSL
28.9
No
No
MDL< SL
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
V
156-59-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.075-0.075
0.075
MDL
3.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
V
10061-01-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.069-0.069
0.069
MDL
0.47
*
RSL
6.04
No
No
MDL< SL
Cyclohexane
V
110-82-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.065-0.065
0.065
MDL
1300
RSL
123
No
No
MDL< SL
Dibromochloromethane
V
124-48-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.073-0.073
0.073
MDL
0.87
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dichlorodifluoromethane
V
75-71-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.12-0.12
0.12
MDL
20
RSL
0.815
No
No
MDL< SL
Ethylbenzene
V
100-41-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.079-0.079
0.079
MDL
1.5
RSL
4.45
No
No
MDL< SL
-------
Table A2-3
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0170)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0170
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
Isopropylbenzene
V
98-82-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.076-0.076
0.076
MDL
45
RSL
121
No
No
MDL< SL
m,p-Xylene
V
179601-23-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.083-0.083
0.083
MDL
19
*
RSL
45.5
No
No
MDL< SL
Methyl Acetate
V
79-20-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.11 -0.11
0.11
MDL
2000
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Methyl Tert Butyl Ether
V
1634-04-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.053-0.053
0.053
MDL
14
RSL
533
No
No
MDL< SL
Methylcyclohexane
V
108-87-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.08-0.08
0.08
MDL
1300
*
RSL
123
No
No
MDL< SL
Methylene chloride
V
75-09-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.053-0.053
0.053
MDL
11
RSL
555
No
No
MDL< SL
o-Xylene
V
95-47-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.075-0.075
0.075
MDL
19
RSL
63.3
No
No
MDL< SL
Styrene
V
100-42-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.082-0.082
0.082
MDL
120
RSL
1210
No
No
MDL< SL
Tetrachloroethene
V
127-18-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.083-0.083
0.083
MDL
4.1
RSL
7.25
No
No
MDL< SL
Toluene
V
108-88-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.077-0.077
0.077
MDL
110
RSL
2390
No
No
MDL< SL
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
V
156-60-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.081 -0.081
0.081
MDL
6.8
RSL
12.9
No
No
MDL< SL
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
V
10061-02-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.07-0.07
0.07
MDL
0.47
*
RSL
6.04
No
No
MDL< SL
Trichloroethene
V
79-01-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.062-0.062
0.062
MDL
0.28
RSL
0.632
No
No
MDL< SL
Trichlorofluoromethane
V
75-69-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.11 -0.11
0.11
MDL
520
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Vinyl chloride
V
75-01-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.07-0.07
0.07
MDL
0.019
RSL
0.164
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs)
1,1 '-Biphenyl
V
92-52-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.9-1.9
1.9
MDL
0.083
RSL
4.71
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
V
95-94-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
0.017
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1-Methylnaphthalene
V
90-12-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0055-0.0055
0.0055
MDL
1.1
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
58-90-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
24
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
95-95-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
120
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
88-06-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.7-1.7
1.7
MDL
1.2
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2,4-Dichlorophenol
120-83-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
4.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4-Dimethylphenol
105-67-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
36
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4-Dinitrophenol
51-28-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.98-0.98
0.98
MDL
3.9
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
121-14-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.2-2.2
2.2
MDL
0.24
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
606-20-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.9-1.9
1.9
MDL
0.049
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2-Chloronaphthalene
V
91-58-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
75
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Chlorophenol
V
95-57-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
9.1
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Methylnaphthalene
V
91-57-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0066-0.0066
0.0066
MDL
3.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Methylphenol
95-48-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.6-2.6
2.6
MDL
93
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Nitroaniline
88-74-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
"3-
oo
I
oo
3.4
MDL
19
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Nitrophenol
88-75-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.7-2.7
2.7
MDL
0.2
*
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
91-94-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.7-1.7
1.7
MDL
0.13
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
3-Nitroaniline
99-09-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.67-0.67
0.67
MDL
19
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
534-52-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
0.15
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
V
101-55-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
4
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Chloro-3-methyl phenol
59-50-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
140
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Chloroaniline
106-47-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
4.6-4.6
4.6
MDL
0.37
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
V
7005-72-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.4-2.4
2.4
MDL
4
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Methylphenol
106-44-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.6-2.6
2.6
MDL
37
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
-------
Table A2-3
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0170)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0170
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
4-Nitroaniline
100-01-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.85-0.85
0.85
MDL
3.8
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Nitrophenol
100-02-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.4-2.4
2.4
MDL
0.2
*
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Acenaphthene
V
83-32-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0061 -0.0061
0.0061
MDL
53
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Acenaphthylene
V
208-96-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0069-0.0069
0.0069
MDL
53
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Acetophenone
V
98-86-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.2-2.2
2.2
MDL
190
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Anthracene
V
120-12-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.011 -0.011
0.011
MDL
180
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Atrazine
1912-24-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.48-0.48
0.48
MDL
0.3
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Benzaldehyde
V
100-52-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.5-2.5
2.5
MDL
19
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(a)anthracene
V
56-55-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0094-0.0094
0.0094
MDL
0.03
RSL
62.3
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(a)pyrene
50-32-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.017-0.017
0.017
MDL
0.025
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
205-99-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0082-0.0082
0.0082
MDL
0.25
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
V
191-24-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0069-0.0069
0.0069
MDL
12
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
207-08-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0041 -0.0041
0.0041
MDL
2.5
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
111-91-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.9-2.9
2.9
MDL
5.9
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
V
111-44-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
0.014
RSL
17
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
V
108-60-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
71
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
117-81-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.82-0.82
0.82
MDL
5.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Butyl benzyl phthalate
85-68-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.4-1.4
1.4
MDL
16
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Caprolactam
105-60-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.8-1.8
1.8
MDL
990
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Carbazole
V
86-74-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
3.2-3.2
3.2
MDL
29
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Chrysene
218-01-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0054-0.0054
0.0054
MDL
25
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dibenzo(a, h)anthracene
53-70-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0059-0.0059
0.0059
MDL
0.025
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dibenzofuran
V
132-64-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.2-2.2
2.2
MDL
0.79
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Diethyl phthalate
84-66-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
1500
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dimethyl phthalate
131-11-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
1500
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Di-n-butyl phthalate
84-74-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.6-1.6
1.6
MDL
90
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Di-n-octyl phthalate
117-84-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.64-0.64
0.64
MDL
20
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Fluoranthene
206-44-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.012-0.012
0.012
MDL
80
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Fluorene
V
86-73-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0072-0.0072
0.0072
MDL
29
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Hexachlorobenzene
V
118-74-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.9-1.9
1.9
MDL
0.0098
RSL
0.133
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
Hexachlorobutadiene
V
87-68-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.7-1.7
1.7
MDL
0.14
RSL
0.414
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
V
77-47-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.6-1.6
1.6
MDL
0.041
RSL
0.0786
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
Hexachloroethane
V
67-72-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.6-2.6
2.6
MDL
0.33
RSL
2.29
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
193-39-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0069-0.0069
0.0069
MDL
0.25
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Isophorone
78-59-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.8-1.8
1.8
MDL
78
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Naphthalene
V
91-20-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0077-0.0077
0.0077
MDL
0.12
RSL
6.29
No
No
MDL< SL
Nitrobenzene
V
98-95-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.5-2.5
2.5
MDL
0.14
RSL
99.3
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
621-64-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.4-2.4
2.4
MDL
0.011
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
86-30-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
3.6-3.6
3.6
MDL
12
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Pentachlorophenol
87-86-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.024-0.024
0.024
MDL
0.041
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Phenanthrene
V
85-01-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0087-0.0087
0.0087
MDL
180
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
-------
Table A2-3
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0170)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0170
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
Phenol
108-95-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.5-2.5
2.5
MDL
580
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Pyrene
V
129-00-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.014-0.014
0.014
MDL
12
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
DIOX
Total PCDD/F TEQ (Mammal) V TEQ-M-DF N/A N/A |jg/L 0/1 0% N/A N/A - 0.00000012 * RSL 3.61 E-05 No No No values for dioxin TEQ
PCB
Total PCB TEQ (Mammal)
V
TEQ-M-PCB
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
N/A
N/A
-
0.00000012
*
RSL
3.61 E-05
No
No
No values for dioxin TEQ
Total PCB Congener
V
TPCB_CON
0.00014
J
0.00014
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
N/A
0.00014
MDC
0.044
*
RSL
1.65
No
No
MDC < SL
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA)
375-95-1
0.0029
0.0029
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.0018-0.0018
0.0029
MDC
0.0059
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS)
355-46-4
0.0064
0.0064
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.0018-0.0018
0.0064
MDC
0.039
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS)
375-73-5
0.31
0.31
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.0035-0.0035
0.31
MDC
0.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
1763-23-1
0.26
0.26
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.0035-0.0035
0.26
MDC
0.004
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
335-67-1
0.015
0.015
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.00035-0.00035
0.015
MDC
0.006
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Total Metals
Aluminum
7429-90-5
110
110
mq/l
1/1
100%
4-4
110
MDC
2000
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Antimony
7440-36-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.32-0.32
0.32
MDL
0.78
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Arsenic
7440-38-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.33-0.33
0.33
MDL
0.052
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Barium
7440-39-3
69
69
mq/l
1/1
100%
1.9-1.9
69
MDC
380
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Beryllium
7440-41-7
0.34
J
0.34
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.17-0.17
0.34
MDC
2.5
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Cadmium
7440-43-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.14-0.14
0.14
MDL
0.18
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Calcium
7440-70-2
9500
9500
mq/l
1/1
100%
120-120
9500
MDC
Nutrient
N/A
Nutrient
No
No
Classified as an essential nutrient
Chromium, Total
7440-47-3
6.6
J+
6.6
J+
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.32-0.32
6.6
MDC
2200
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Chromium, Hexavalent
18540-29-9
5.87
5.87
mq/l
1/1
100%
5.9-5.9
5.87
MDC
0.035
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Cobalt
7440-48-4
6.5
6.5
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.19-0.19
6.5
MDC
0.6
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Copper
7440-50-8
63
63
mq/l
1/1
100%
"3-
O
I
o
63
MDC
80
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Iron
7439-89-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
54-54
54
MDL
1400
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Lead
7439-92-1
2.5
2.5
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.21 -0.21
2.5
MDC
15
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Manganese
7439-96-5
40
J+
40
J+
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.17-0.17
40
MDC
43
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Mercury
7439-97-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.06-0.06
0.06
MDL
0.2
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Nickel
7440-02-0
53
53
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.2-0.2
53
MDC
39
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Selenium
7782-49-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.2-1.2
1.2
MDL
10
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Silver
7440-22-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.18-0.18
0.18
MDL
9.4
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Thallium
7440-28-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.23-0.23
0.23
MDL
0.02
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Vanadium
7440-62-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.2-1.2
1.2
MDL
8.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Zinc
7440-66-6
38
38
mq/l
1/1
100%
1.6-1.6
38
MDC
600
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Total Cyanide
Cyanide V 57-12-5 N/A N/A |jg/L 0/1 0% 2.6-2.6 2.6 MDL 0.15 RSL 20.1 No See DSA MDL > SL
Notes:
% = Percent
AL = Action Level
-------
Table A2-3
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0170)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0170
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
CASRN = Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number
COPC = Chemical of Potential Concern
DSA = Data Sensitivity Analysis
HAL = Health Advisory Level
J = Indicates an estimated value
J+ = The result is an estimated quantity, but the result may be biased high.
MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level
MDC = Maximum Detected Concentration
N/A = Not Applicable
ND = Non-Detect or Not Detected
"PFOA and PFOS Combined" = Combined total of the detected concentrations of PFOA and PFOS (non-detect results were not included in the summation).
RL = Reporting Limit
RSL = Regional Screening Level
|jg/L = micrograms per liter
USEPA = United States Environmental Protection Agency
(1) "V" indicates that the chemical is volatile.
(2) Groundwater data screened against USEPA Tap Water RSLs, last updated May 2022 (TR = 1E-6, THQ = 0.1).
(3) An asterisk,"*", indicates surrogate toxicity information was used to derive a Screening Level (see Table A2-14).
(4) Groundwater data screened against USEPA Residential Groundwater VI SLs, last updated May 2022 (TR= 1E-6, THQ = 0.1). Site-specific, system temperature was set to 20.5 Celsius (average of recorded temperatures taken infield).
(6) Lead is compared to the EPA tap water RSL of 15 |jg/L, which represents the 90th percentile concentration of lead found in tap water samples collected nationwide (Lead and Copper Rule, 56 Federal Register 26460-26564, dated June 7,1991) and
is not a risk-based number, but rather an action level.
-------
Table A2-4
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0173)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0173
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
V
71-55-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.075-0.075
0.075
MDL
800
RSL
893
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
V
79-34-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.05-0.05
0.05
MDL
0.076
RSL
4.18
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
V
79-00-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.042-0.042
0.042
MDL
0.041
RSL
0.779
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane (Freon 113)
V
76-13-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.099-0.099
0.099
MDL
1000
RSL
28.5
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1-Dichloroethane
V
75-34-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.058-0.058
0.058
MDL
2.8
RSL
9.09
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1-Dichloroethene
V
75-35-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.064-0.064
0.064
MDL
28
RSL
22.7
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
V
87-61-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.076-0.076
0.076
MDL
0.7
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
V
96-18-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.077-0.077
0.077
MDL
0.00075
RSL
2.89
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
V
120-82-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.068-0.068
0.068
MDL
0.4
RSL
4.97
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
V
95-63-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.051 -0.051
0.051
MDL
5.6
RSL
33
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
V
96-12-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.14-0.14
0.14
MDL
0.00033
RSL
0.0381
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2-Dibromoethane
V
106-93-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.052-0.052
0.052
MDL
0.0075
RSL
0.221
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
V
95-50-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.045-0.045
0.045
MDL
30
RSL
351
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2-Dichloroethane
V
107-06-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.079-0.079
0.079
MDL
0.17
RSL
2.74
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2-Dichloropropane
V
78-87-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.069-0.069
0.069
MDL
0.82
RSL
4.44
No
No
MDL< SL
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
V
108-67-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.067-0.067
0.067
MDL
6
RSL
23.2
No
No
MDL< SL
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
V
541-73-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.071 -0.071
0.071
MDL
30
*
RSL
351
No
No
MDL< SL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
V
106-46-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.047-0.047
0.047
MDL
0.48
RSL
3.42
No
No
MDL< SL
1,4-Dioxane
V
123-91-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.86-0.86
0.86
MDL
0.46
RSL
3570
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2-Butanone (MEK)
V
78-93-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
lo
I
lo
1.5
MDL
560
RSL
274000
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Hexanone
V
591-78-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.68-0.68
0.68
MDL
3.8
RSL
1060
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
V
108-10-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
O
I
o
0.71
MDL
630
RSL
70200
No
No
MDL< SL
Acetone
V
67-64-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
1800
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzene
V
71-43-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.085-0.085
0.085
MDL
0.46
RSL
1.92
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromochloromethane
V
74-97-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.064-0.064
0.064
MDL
8.3
RSL
83.9
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromodichloromethane
V
75-27-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.062-0.062
0.062
MDL
0.13
RSL
1.08
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromoform
V
75-25-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.095-0.095
0.095
MDL
3.3
RSL
152
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromomethane
V
74-83-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.058-0.058
0.058
MDL
0.75
RSL
1.98
No
No
MDL< SL
Carbon disulfide
V
75-15-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.092-0.092
0.092
MDL
81
RSL
145
No
No
MDL< SL
Carbon tetrachloride
V
56-23-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.086-0.086
0.086
MDL
0.46
RSL
0.499
No
No
MDL< SL
Chlorobenzene
V
108-90-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.064-0.064
0.064
MDL
7.8
RSL
51.9
No
No
MDL< SL
Chloroethane
V
75-00-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.074-0.074
0.074
MDL
830
RSL
1050
No
No
MDL< SL
Chloroform
V
67-66-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.079-0.079
0.079
MDL
0.22
RSL
0.972
No
No
MDL< SL
Chloromethane
V
74-87-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.082-0.082
0.082
MDL
19
RSL
28.9
No
No
MDL< SL
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
V
156-59-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.075-0.075
0.075
MDL
3.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
V
10061-01-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.069-0.069
0.069
MDL
0.47
*
RSL
6.04
No
No
MDL< SL
Cyclohexane
V
110-82-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.065-0.065
0.065
MDL
1300
RSL
123
No
No
MDL< SL
Dibromochloromethane
V
124-48-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.073-0.073
0.073
MDL
0.87
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dichlorodifluoromethane
V
75-71-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.12-0.12
0.12
MDL
20
RSL
0.815
No
No
MDL< SL
Ethylbenzene
V
100-41-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.079-0.079
0.079
MDL
1.5
RSL
4.45
No
No
MDL< SL
-------
Table A2-4
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0173)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0173
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
Isopropylbenzene
V
98-82-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.076-0.076
0.076
MDL
45
RSL
121
No
No
MDL< SL
m,p-Xylene
V
179601-23-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.083-0.083
0.083
MDL
19
*
RSL
45.5
No
No
MDL< SL
Methyl Acetate
V
79-20-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.11 -0.11
0.11
MDL
2000
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Methyl Tert Butyl Ether
V
1634-04-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.053-0.053
0.053
MDL
14
RSL
533
No
No
MDL< SL
Methylcyclohexane
V
108-87-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.08-0.08
0.08
MDL
1300
*
RSL
123
No
No
MDL< SL
Methylene chloride
V
75-09-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.053-0.053
0.053
MDL
11
RSL
555
No
No
MDL< SL
o-Xylene
V
95-47-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.075-0.075
0.075
MDL
19
RSL
63.3
No
No
MDL< SL
Styrene
V
100-42-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.082-0.082
0.082
MDL
120
RSL
1210
No
No
MDL< SL
Tetrachloroethene
V
127-18-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.083-0.083
0.083
MDL
4.1
RSL
7.25
No
No
MDL< SL
Toluene
V
108-88-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.077-0.077
0.077
MDL
110
RSL
2390
No
No
MDL< SL
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
V
156-60-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.081 -0.081
0.081
MDL
6.8
RSL
12.9
No
No
MDL< SL
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
V
10061-02-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.07-0.07
0.07
MDL
0.47
*
RSL
6.04
No
No
MDL< SL
Trichloroethene
V
79-01-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.062-0.062
0.062
MDL
0.28
RSL
0.632
No
No
MDL< SL
Trichlorofluoromethane
V
75-69-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.11 -0.11
0.11
MDL
520
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Vinyl chloride
V
75-01-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.07-0.07
0.07
MDL
0.019
RSL
0.164
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs)
1,1 '-Biphenyl
V
92-52-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.8-1.8
1.8
MDL
0.083
RSL
4.71
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
V
95-94-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
0.017
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1-Methylnaphthalene
V
90-12-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0052-0.0052
0.0052
MDL
1.1
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
58-90-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.2-2.2
2.2
MDL
24
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
95-95-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
120
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
88-06-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.6-1.6
1.6
MDL
1.2
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2,4-Dichlorophenol
120-83-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.2-2.2
2.2
MDL
4.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4-Dimethylphenol
105-67-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.9-1.9
1.9
MDL
36
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4-Dinitrophenol
51-28-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.93-0.93
0.93
MDL
3.9
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
121-14-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
0.24
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
606-20-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.8-1.8
1.8
MDL
0.049
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2-Chloronaphthalene
V
91-58-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.9-1.9
1.9
MDL
75
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Chlorophenol
V
95-57-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
9.1
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Methylnaphthalene
V
91-57-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0063-0.0063
0.0063
MDL
3.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Methylphenol
95-48-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.5-2.5
2.5
MDL
93
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Nitroaniline
88-74-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
CM
CO
I
CM
CO
3.2
MDL
19
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Nitrophenol
88-75-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.6-2.6
2.6
MDL
0.2
*
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
91-94-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.6-1.6
1.6
MDL
0.13
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
3-Nitroaniline
99-09-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.64-0.64
0.64
MDL
19
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
534-52-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
0.15
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
V
101-55-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.2-2.2
2.2
MDL
4
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Chloro-3-methyl phenol
59-50-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
140
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Chloroaniline
106-47-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
4.4-4.4
4.4
MDL
0.37
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
V
7005-72-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
4
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Methylphenol
106-44-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.5-2.5
2.5
MDL
37
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
-------
Table A2-4
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0173)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0173
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
4-Nitroaniline
100-01-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
O
CO
I
o
CO
0.81
MDL
3.8
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Nitrophenol
100-02-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
0.2
*
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Acenaphthene
V
83-32-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0058-0.0058
0.0058
MDL
53
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Acenaphthylene
V
208-96-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0066-0.0066
0.0066
MDL
53
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Acetophenone
V
98-86-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
190
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Anthracene
V
120-12-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.01 -0.01
0.01
MDL
180
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Atrazine
1912-24-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.46-0.46
0.46
MDL
0.3
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Benzaldehyde
V
100-52-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.4-2.4
2.4
MDL
19
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(a)anthracene
V
56-55-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.009-0.009
0.009
MDL
0.03
RSL
62.3
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(a)pyrene
50-32-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.016-0.016
0.016
MDL
0.025
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
205-99-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0078-0.0078
0.0078
MDL
0.25
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
V
191-24-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0066-0.0066
0.0066
MDL
12
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
207-08-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0039-0.0039
0.0039
MDL
2.5
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
111-91-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.8-2.8
2.8
MDL
5.9
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
V
111-44-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
0.014
RSL
17
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
V
108-60-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.2-2.2
2.2
MDL
71
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
117-81-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.78-0.78
0.78
MDL
5.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Butyl benzyl phthalate
85-68-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.3-1.3
1.3
MDL
16
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Caprolactam
105-60-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.7-1.7
1.7
MDL
990
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Carbazole
V
86-74-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
3-3
3
MDL
29
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Chrysene
218-01-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0051 -0.0051
0.0051
MDL
25
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dibenzo(a, h)anthracene
53-70-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0056-0.0056
0.0056
MDL
0.025
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dibenzofuran
V
132-64-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
0.79
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Diethyl phthalate
84-66-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.9-1.9
1.9
MDL
1500
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dimethyl phthalate
131-11-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.9-1.9
1.9
MDL
1500
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Di-n-butyl phthalate
84-74-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.5-1.5
1.5
MDL
90
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Di-n-octyl phthalate
117-84-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.61 -0.61
0.61
MDL
20
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Fluoranthene
206-44-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.011 -0.011
0.011
MDL
80
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Fluorene
V
86-73-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0069-0.0069
0.0069
MDL
29
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Hexachlorobenzene
V
118-74-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.8-1.8
1.8
MDL
0.0098
RSL
0.133
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
Hexachlorobutadiene
V
87-68-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.6-1.6
1.6
MDL
0.14
RSL
0.414
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
Hexachloroethane
V
67-72-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.5-2.5
2.5
MDL
0.33
RSL
2.29
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
193-39-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0066-0.0066
0.0066
MDL
0.25
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Isophorone
78-59-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.7-1.7
1.7
MDL
78
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Naphthalene
V
91-20-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0073-0.0073
0.0073
MDL
0.12
RSL
6.29
No
No
MDL< SL
Nitrobenzene
V
98-95-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.4-2.4
2.4
MDL
0.14
RSL
99.3
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
621-64-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
0.011
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
86-30-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
3.4-3.4
3.4
MDL
12
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Pentachlorophenol
87-86-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.023-0.023
0.023
MDL
0.041
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Phenanthrene
V
85-01-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0083-0.0083
0.0083
MDL
180
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Phenol
108-95-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.4-2.4
2.4
MDL
580
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
-------
Table A2-4
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0173)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0173
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
Pyrene V
129-00-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1 0%
0.013-0.013
0.013 MDL
12
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
DIOX
Total PCDD/F TEQ (Mammal) V TEQ-M-DF N/A N/A |jg/L 0/1 0% N/A N/A - 0.00000012 * RSL 3.61 E-05 No No No values for dioxin TEQ
PCB
Total PCB TEQ (Mammal)
V
TEQ-M-PCB
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
N/A
N/A
-
0.00000012
*
RSL
3.61 E-05
No
No
No values for dioxin TEQ
Total PCB Congener
V
TPCB_CON
0.000049
J
0.000049
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
N/A
0.000049
MDC
0.044
*
RSL
1.65
No
No
MDC < SL
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA)
375-95-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0018-0.0018
0.0018
MDL
0.0059
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS)
355-46-4
0.00086
J
0.00086
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.0018-0.0018
0.00086
MDC
0.039
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS)
375-73-5
0.0078
0.0078
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.00035-0.00035
0.0078
MDC
0.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
1763-23-1
0.024
J
0.024
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.00035-0.00035
0.024
MDC
0.004
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
335-67-1
0.0023
0.0023
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.00035-0.00035
0.0023
MDC
0.006
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Total Metals
Aluminum
7429-90-5
85
85
mq/l
1/1
100%
4-4
85
MDC
2000
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Antimony
7440-36-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.32-0.32
0.32
MDL
0.78
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Arsenic
7440-38-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.33-0.33
0.33
MDL
0.052
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Barium
7440-39-3
430
430
mq/l
1/1
100%
1.9-1.9
430
MDC
380
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Beryllium
7440-41-7
1.1
1.1
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.17-0.17
1.1
MDC
2.5
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Cadmium
7440-43-9
0.16
J
0.16
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.14-0.14
0.16
MDC
0.18
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Calcium
7440-70-2
6800
6800
mq/l
1/1
100%
120-120
6800
MDC
Nutrient
N/A
Nutrient
No
No
Classified as an essential nutrient
Chromium, Total
7440-47-3
0.63
J
0.63
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.32-0.32
0.63
MDC
2200
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Chromium, Hexavalent
18540-29-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1-1
1
MDL
0.035
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Cobalt
7440-48-4
22
22
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.19-0.19
22
MDC
0.6
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Copper
7440-50-8
60
60
mq/l
1/1
100%
"3-
O
I
o
60
MDC
80
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Iron
7439-89-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
54-54
54
MDL
1400
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Lead
7439-92-1
2.9
2.9
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.21 -0.21
2.9
MDC
15
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Manganese
7439-96-5
220
220
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.17-0.17
220
MDC
43
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Mercury
7439-97-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.06-0.06
0.06
MDL
0.2
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Nickel
7440-02-0
7.3
JB+
7.3
JB+
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.2-0.2
7.3
MDC
39
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Selenium
7782-49-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.2-1.2
1.2
MDL
10
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Silver
7440-22-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.18-0.18
0.18
MDL
9.4
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Thallium
7440-28-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.23-0.23
0.23
MDL
0.02
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Vanadium
7440-62-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.2-1.2
1.2
MDL
8.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Zinc
7440-66-6
70
70
mq/l
1/1
100%
1.6-1.6
70
MDC
600
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Total Cyanide
Cyanide V 57-12-5 9.5 J 9.5 J |jg/L 1/1 100% 2.6-2.6 9.5 MDC 0.15 RSL 20.1 No Yes MDC>SL
Notes:
% = Percent
AL = Action Level
CASRN = Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number
-------
Table A2-4
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0173)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0173
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
COPC = Chemical of Potential Concern
DSA = Data Sensitivity Analysis
HAL = Health Advisory Level
J = Indicates an estimated value
MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level
MDC = Maximum Detected Concentration
N/A = Not Applicable
ND = Non-Detect or Not Detected
"PFOA and PFOS Combined" = Combined total of the detected concentrations of PFOA and PFOS (non-detect results were not included in the summation).
RL = Reporting Limit
RSL = Regional Screening Level
|jg/L = micrograms per liter
USEPA = United States Environmental Protection Agency
(1) "V" indicates that the chemical is volatile.
(2) Groundwater data screened against USEPA Tap Water RSLs, last updated May 2022 (TR = 1E-6, THQ = 0.1).
(3) An asterisk,"*", indicates surrogate toxicity information was used to derive a Screening Level (see Table A2-14).
(4) Groundwater data screened against USEPA Residential Groundwater VI SLs, last updated May 2022 (TR= 1E-6, THQ = 0.1). Site-specific, system temperature was set to 20.5 Celsius (average of recorded temperatures taken infield).
(6) Lead is compared to the EPA tap water RSL of 15 |jg/L, which represents the 90th percentile concentration of lead found in tap water samples collected nationwide (Lead and Copper Rule, 56 Federal Register 26460-26564, dated June 7,1991) and
is not a risk-based number, but rather an action level.
-------
Table A2-5
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0176)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0176
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
V
71-55-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.075-0.075
0.075
MDL
800
RSL
893
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
V
79-34-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.05-0.05
0.05
MDL
0.076
RSL
4.18
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
V
79-00-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.042-0.042
0.042
MDL
0.041
RSL
0.779
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane (Freon 113)
V
76-13-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.099-0.099
0.099
MDL
1000
RSL
28.5
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1-Dichloroethane
V
75-34-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.058-0.058
0.058
MDL
2.8
RSL
9.09
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1-Dichloroethene
V
75-35-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.064-0.064
0.064
MDL
28
RSL
22.7
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
V
87-61-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.076-0.076
0.076
MDL
0.7
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
V
96-18-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.077-0.077
0.077
MDL
0.00075
RSL
2.89
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
V
120-82-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.068-0.068
0.068
MDL
0.4
RSL
4.97
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
V
95-63-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.051 -0.051
0.051
MDL
5.6
RSL
33
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
V
96-12-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.14-0.14
0.14
MDL
0.00033
RSL
0.0381
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2-Dibromoethane
V
106-93-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.052-0.052
0.052
MDL
0.0075
RSL
0.221
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
V
95-50-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.045-0.045
0.045
MDL
30
RSL
351
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2-Dichloroethane
V
107-06-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.079-0.079
0.079
MDL
0.17
RSL
2.74
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2-Dichloropropane
V
78-87-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.069-0.069
0.069
MDL
0.82
RSL
4.44
No
No
MDL< SL
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
V
108-67-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.067-0.067
0.067
MDL
6
RSL
23.2
No
No
MDL< SL
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
V
541-73-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.071 -0.071
0.071
MDL
30
*
RSL
351
No
No
MDL< SL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
V
106-46-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.047-0.047
0.047
MDL
0.48
RSL
3.42
No
No
MDL< SL
1,4-Dioxane
V
123-91-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.86-0.86
0.86
MDL
0.46
RSL
3570
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2-Butanone (MEK)
V
78-93-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
lo
I
lo
1.5
MDL
560
RSL
274000
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Hexanone
V
591-78-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.68-0.68
0.68
MDL
3.8
RSL
1060
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
V
108-10-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
O
I
o
0.71
MDL
630
RSL
70200
No
No
MDL< SL
Acetone
V
67-64-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
1800
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzene
V
71-43-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.085-0.085
0.085
MDL
0.46
RSL
1.92
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromochloromethane
V
74-97-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.064-0.064
0.064
MDL
8.3
RSL
83.9
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromodichloromethane
V
75-27-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.062-0.062
0.062
MDL
0.13
RSL
1.08
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromoform
V
75-25-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.095-0.095
0.095
MDL
3.3
RSL
152
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromomethane
V
74-83-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.058-0.058
0.058
MDL
0.75
RSL
1.98
No
No
MDL< SL
Carbon disulfide
V
75-15-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.092-0.092
0.092
MDL
81
RSL
145
No
No
MDL< SL
Carbon tetrachloride
V
56-23-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.086-0.086
0.086
MDL
0.46
RSL
0.499
No
No
MDL< SL
Chlorobenzene
V
108-90-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.064-0.064
0.064
MDL
7.8
RSL
51.9
No
No
MDL< SL
Chloroethane
V
75-00-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.074-0.074
0.074
MDL
830
RSL
1050
No
No
MDL< SL
Chloroform
V
67-66-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.079-0.079
0.079
MDL
0.22
RSL
0.972
No
No
MDL< SL
Chloromethane
V
74-87-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.082-0.082
0.082
MDL
19
RSL
28.9
No
No
MDL< SL
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
V
156-59-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.075-0.075
0.075
MDL
3.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
V
10061-01-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.069-0.069
0.069
MDL
0.47
*
RSL
6.04
No
No
MDL< SL
Cyclohexane
V
110-82-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.065-0.065
0.065
MDL
1300
RSL
123
No
No
MDL< SL
Dibromochloromethane
V
124-48-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.073-0.073
0.073
MDL
0.87
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dichlorodifluoromethane
V
75-71-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.12-0.12
0.12
MDL
20
RSL
0.815
No
No
MDL< SL
Ethylbenzene
V
100-41-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.079-0.079
0.079
MDL
1.5
RSL
4.45
No
No
MDL< SL
-------
Table A2-5
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0176)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0176
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
Isopropylbenzene
V
98-82-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.076-0.076
0.076
MDL
45
RSL
121
No
No
MDL< SL
m,p-Xylene
V
179601-23-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.083-0.083
0.083
MDL
19
*
RSL
45.5
No
No
MDL< SL
Methyl Acetate
V
79-20-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.11 -0.11
0.11
MDL
2000
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Methyl Tert Butyl Ether
V
1634-04-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.053-0.053
0.053
MDL
14
RSL
533
No
No
MDL< SL
Methylcyclohexane
V
108-87-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.08-0.08
0.08
MDL
1300
*
RSL
123
No
No
MDL< SL
Methylene chloride
V
75-09-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.053-0.053
0.053
MDL
11
RSL
555
No
No
MDL< SL
o-Xylene
V
95-47-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.075-0.075
0.075
MDL
19
RSL
63.3
No
No
MDL< SL
Styrene
V
100-42-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.082-0.082
0.082
MDL
120
RSL
1210
No
No
MDL< SL
Tetrachloroethene
V
127-18-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.083-0.083
0.083
MDL
4.1
RSL
7.25
No
No
MDL< SL
Toluene
V
108-88-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.077-0.077
0.077
MDL
110
RSL
2390
No
No
MDL< SL
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
V
156-60-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.081 -0.081
0.081
MDL
6.8
RSL
12.9
No
No
MDL< SL
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
V
10061-02-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.07-0.07
0.07
MDL
0.47
*
RSL
6.04
No
No
MDL< SL
Trichloroethene
V
79-01-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.062-0.062
0.062
MDL
0.28
RSL
0.632
No
No
MDL< SL
Trichlorofluoromethane
V
75-69-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.11 -0.11
0.11
MDL
520
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Vinyl chloride
V
75-01-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.07-0.07
0.07
MDL
0.019
RSL
0.164
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs)
1,1 '-Biphenyl
V
92-52-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.8-1.8
1.8
MDL
0.083
RSL
4.71
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
V
95-94-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
0.017
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1-Methylnaphthalene
V
90-12-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0052-0.0052
0.0052
MDL
1.1
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
58-90-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.2-2.2
2.2
MDL
24
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
95-95-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
120
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
88-06-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.6-1.6
1.6
MDL
1.2
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2,4-Dichlorophenol
120-83-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.2-2.2
2.2
MDL
4.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4-Dimethylphenol
105-67-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.9-1.9
1.9
MDL
36
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4-Dinitrophenol
51-28-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.93-0.93
0.93
MDL
3.9
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
121-14-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
0.24
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
606-20-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.8-1.8
1.8
MDL
0.049
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2-Chloronaphthalene
V
91-58-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.9-1.9
1.9
MDL
75
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Chlorophenol
V
95-57-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
9.1
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Methylnaphthalene
V
91-57-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0063-0.0063
0.0063
MDL
3.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Methylphenol
95-48-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.5-2.5
2.5
MDL
93
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Nitroaniline
88-74-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
CM
CO
I
CM
CO
3.2
MDL
19
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Nitrophenol
88-75-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.6-2.6
2.6
MDL
0.2
*
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
91-94-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.6-1.6
1.6
MDL
0.13
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
3-Nitroaniline
99-09-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.64-0.64
0.64
MDL
19
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
534-52-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
0.15
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
V
101-55-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.2-2.2
2.2
MDL
4
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Chloro-3-methyl phenol
59-50-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
140
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Chloroaniline
106-47-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
4.4-4.4
4.4
MDL
0.37
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
V
7005-72-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
4
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Methylphenol
106-44-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.5-2.5
2.5
MDL
37
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
-------
Table A2-5
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0176)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0176
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
4-Nitroaniline
100-01-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
O
CO
I
o
CO
0.81
MDL
3.8
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Nitrophenol
100-02-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
0.2
*
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Acenaphthene
V
83-32-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0058-0.0058
0.0058
MDL
53
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Acenaphthylene
V
208-96-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0066-0.0066
0.0066
MDL
53
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Acetophenone
V
98-86-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
190
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Anthracene
V
120-12-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.01 -0.01
0.01
MDL
180
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Atrazine
1912-24-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.46-0.46
0.46
MDL
0.3
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Benzaldehyde
V
100-52-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.4-2.4
2.4
MDL
19
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(a)anthracene
V
56-55-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.009-0.009
0.009
MDL
0.03
RSL
62.3
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(a)pyrene
50-32-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.016-0.016
0.016
MDL
0.025
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
205-99-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0078-0.0078
0.0078
MDL
0.25
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
V
191-24-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0066-0.0066
0.0066
MDL
12
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
207-08-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0039-0.0039
0.0039
MDL
2.5
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
111-91-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.8-2.8
2.8
MDL
5.9
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
V
111-44-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
0.014
RSL
17
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
V
108-60-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.2-2.2
2.2
MDL
71
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
117-81-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.78-0.78
0.78
MDL
5.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Butyl benzyl phthalate
85-68-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.3-1.3
1.3
MDL
16
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Caprolactam
105-60-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.7-1.7
1.7
MDL
990
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Carbazole
V
86-74-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
3-3
3
MDL
29
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Chrysene
218-01-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0051 -0.0051
0.0051
MDL
25
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dibenzo(a, h)anthracene
53-70-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0056-0.0056
0.0056
MDL
0.025
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dibenzofuran
V
132-64-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
0.79
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Diethyl phthalate
84-66-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.9-1.9
1.9
MDL
1500
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dimethyl phthalate
131-11-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.9-1.9
1.9
MDL
1500
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Di-n-butyl phthalate
84-74-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.5-1.5
1.5
MDL
90
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Di-n-octyl phthalate
117-84-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.61 -0.61
0.61
MDL
20
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Fluoranthene
206-44-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.011 -0.011
0.011
MDL
80
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Fluorene
V
86-73-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0069-0.0069
0.0069
MDL
29
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Hexachlorobenzene
V
118-74-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.8-1.8
1.8
MDL
0.0098
RSL
0.133
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
Hexachlorobutadiene
V
87-68-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.6-1.6
1.6
MDL
0.14
RSL
0.414
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
Hexachloroethane
V
67-72-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.5-2.5
2.5
MDL
0.33
RSL
2.29
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
193-39-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0066-0.0066
0.0066
MDL
0.25
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Isophorone
78-59-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.7-1.7
1.7
MDL
78
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Naphthalene
V
91-20-3
0.017
JB
0.017
JB
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.0073-0.0073
0.017
MDC
0.12
RSL
6.29
No
No
MDC < SL
Nitrobenzene
V
98-95-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.4-2.4
2.4
MDL
0.14
RSL
99.3
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
621-64-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
0.011
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
86-30-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
3.4-3.4
3.4
MDL
12
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Pentachlorophenol
87-86-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.023-0.023
0.023
MDL
0.041
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Phenanthrene
V
85-01-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0083-0.0083
0.0083
MDL
180
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Phenol
108-95-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.4-2.4
2.4
MDL
580
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
-------
Table A2-5
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0176)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0176
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
Pyrene V
129-00-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1 0%
0.013-0.013
0.013 MDL
12
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
DIOX
Total PCDD/F TEQ (Mammal) V TEQ-M-DF N/A N/A |jg/L 0/1 0% N/A N/A - 0.00000012 * RSL 3.61 E-05 No No No values for dioxin TEQ
PCB
Total PCB TEQ (Mammal)
V
TEQ-M-PCB
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
N/A
N/A
-
0.00000012
*
RSL
3.61 E-05
No
No
No values for dioxin TEQ
Total PCB Congener
V
TPCB_CON
0.000043
J
0.000043
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
N/A
0.000043
MDC
0.044
*
RSL
1.65
No
No
MDC < SL
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA)
375-95-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0018-0.0018
0.0018
MDL
0.0059
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS)
355-46-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0018-0.0018
0.0018
MDL
0.039
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS)
375-73-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.00036-0.00036
0.00036
MDL
0.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
1763-23-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.00036-0.00036
0.00036
MDL
0.004
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
335-67-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.00036-0.00036
0.00036
MDL
0.006
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Total Metals
Aluminum
7429-90-5
47
47
mq/l
1/1
100%
4-4
47
MDC
2000
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Antimony
7440-36-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.32-0.32
0.32
MDL
0.78
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Arsenic
7440-38-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.33-0.33
0.33
MDL
0.052
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Barium
7440-39-3
420
420
mq/l
1/1
100%
1.9-1.9
420
MDC
380
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Beryllium
7440-41-7
0.93
J
0.93
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.17-0.17
0.93
MDC
2.5
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Cadmium
7440-43-9
0.2
J
0.2
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.14-0.14
0.2
MDC
0.18
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Calcium
7440-70-2
7800
7800
mq/l
1/1
100%
120-120
7800
MDC
Nutrient
N/A
Nutrient
No
No
Classified as an essential nutrient
Chromium, Total
7440-47-3
0.61
J
0.61
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.32-0.32
0.61
MDC
2200
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Chromium, Hexavalent
18540-29-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1-1
1
MDL
0.035
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Cobalt
7440-48-4
14
14
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.19-0.19
14
MDC
0.6
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Copper
7440-50-8
70
70
mq/l
1/1
100%
"3-
O
I
o
70
MDC
80
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Iron
7439-89-6
320
320
mq/l
1/1
100%
54-54
320
MDC
1400
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Lead
7439-92-1
15
15
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.21 -0.21
15
MDC
15
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Manganese
7439-96-5
160
160
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.17-0.17
160
MDC
43
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Mercury
7439-97-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.06-0.06
0.06
MDL
0.2
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Nickel
7440-02-0
6.6
JB+
6.6
JB+
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.2-0.2
6.6
MDC
39
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Selenium
7782-49-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.2-1.2
1.2
MDL
10
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Silver
7440-22-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.18-0.18
0.18
MDL
9.4
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Thallium
7440-28-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.23-0.23
0.23
MDL
0.02
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Vanadium
7440-62-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.2-1.2
1.2
MDL
8.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Zinc
7440-66-6
120
120
mq/l
1/1
100%
1.6-1.6
120
MDC
600
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Total Cyanide
Cyanide V 57-12-5 9 J 9 J |jg/L 1/1 100% 2.6-2.6 9 MDC 0.15 RSL 20.1 No Yes MDC>SL
Notes:
% = Percent
AL = Action Level
CASRN = Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number
-------
Table A2-5
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0176)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0176
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
COPC = Chemical of Potential Concern
DSA = Data Sensitivity Analysis
HAL = Health Advisory Level
J = Indicates an estimated value
MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level
MDC = Maximum Detected Concentration
N/A = Not Applicable
ND = Non-Detect or Not Detected
"PFOA and PFOS Combined" = Combined total of the detected concentrations of PFOA and PFOS (non-detect results were not included in the summation).
RL = Reporting Limit
RSL = Regional Screening Level
|jg/L = micrograms per liter
USEPA = United States Environmental Protection Agency
(1) "V" indicates that the chemical is volatile.
(2) Groundwater data screened against USEPA Tap Water RSLs, last updated May 2022 (TR = 1E-6, THQ = 0.1).
(3) An asterisk,"*", indicates surrogate toxicity information was used to derive a Screening Level (see Table A2-14).
(4) Groundwater data screened against USEPA Residential Groundwater VI SLs, last updated May 2022 (TR= 1E-6, THQ = 0.1). Site-specific, system temperature was set to 20.5 Celsius (average of recorded temperatures taken infield).
(6) Lead is compared to the EPA tap water RSL of 15 |jg/L, which represents the 90th percentile concentration of lead found in tap water samples collected nationwide (Lead and Copper Rule, 56 Federal Register 26460-26564, dated June 7,1991) and
is not a risk-based number, but rather an action level.
-------
Table A2-6
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0182)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0182
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
V
71-55-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.075-0.075
0.075
MDL
800
RSL
893
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
V
79-34-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.05-0.05
0.05
MDL
0.076
RSL
4.18
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
V
79-00-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.042-0.042
0.042
MDL
0.041
RSL
0.779
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane (Freon 113)
V
76-13-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.099-0.099
0.099
MDL
1000
RSL
28.5
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1-Dichloroethane
V
75-34-3
0.069
J
0.069
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.058-0.058
0.069
MDC
2.8
RSL
9.09
No
No
MDC < SL
1,1-Dichloroethene
V
75-35-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.064-0.064
0.064
MDL
28
RSL
22.7
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
V
87-61-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.076-0.076
0.076
MDL
0.7
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
V
96-18-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.077-0.077
0.077
MDL
0.00075
RSL
2.89
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
V
120-82-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.068-0.068
0.068
MDL
0.4
RSL
4.97
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
V
95-63-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.051 -0.051
0.051
MDL
5.6
RSL
33
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
V
96-12-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.14-0.14
0.14
MDL
0.00033
RSL
0.0381
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2-Dibromoethane
V
106-93-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.052-0.052
0.052
MDL
0.0075
RSL
0.221
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
V
95-50-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.045-0.045
0.045
MDL
30
RSL
351
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2-Dichloroethane
V
107-06-2
0.15
J
0.15
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.079-0.079
0.15
MDC
0.17
RSL
2.74
No
No
MDC < SL
1,2-Dichloropropane
V
78-87-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.069-0.069
0.069
MDL
0.82
RSL
4.44
No
No
MDL< SL
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
V
108-67-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.067-0.067
0.067
MDL
6
RSL
23.2
No
No
MDL< SL
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
V
541-73-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.071 -0.071
0.071
MDL
30
*
RSL
351
No
No
MDL< SL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
V
106-46-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.047-0.047
0.047
MDL
0.48
RSL
3.42
No
No
MDL< SL
1,4-Dioxane
V
123-91-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.9-0.9
0.9
MDL
0.46
RSL
3570
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2-Butanone (MEK)
V
78-93-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
lo
I
lo
1.5
MDL
560
RSL
274000
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Hexanone
V
591-78-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.68-0.68
0.68
MDL
3.8
RSL
1060
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
V
108-10-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
O
I
o
0.71
MDL
630
RSL
70200
No
No
MDL< SL
Acetone
V
67-64-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
1800
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzene
V
71-43-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.085-0.085
0.085
MDL
0.46
RSL
1.92
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromochloromethane
V
74-97-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.064-0.064
0.064
MDL
8.3
RSL
83.9
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromodichloromethane
V
75-27-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.062-0.062
0.062
MDL
0.13
RSL
1.08
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromoform
V
75-25-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.095-0.095
0.095
MDL
3.3
RSL
152
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromomethane
V
74-83-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.058-0.058
0.058
MDL
0.75
RSL
1.98
No
No
MDL< SL
Carbon disulfide
V
75-15-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.092-0.092
0.092
MDL
81
RSL
145
No
No
MDL< SL
Carbon tetrachloride
V
56-23-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.086-0.086
0.086
MDL
0.46
RSL
0.499
No
No
MDL< SL
Chlorobenzene
V
108-90-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.064-0.064
0.064
MDL
7.8
RSL
51.9
No
No
MDL< SL
Chloroethane
V
75-00-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.074-0.074
0.074
MDL
830
RSL
1050
No
No
MDL< SL
Chloroform
V
67-66-3
0.14
J
0.14
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.079-0.079
0.14
MDC
0.22
RSL
0.972
No
No
MDC < SL
Chloromethane
V
74-87-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.082-0.082
0.082
MDL
19
RSL
28.9
No
No
MDL< SL
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
V
156-59-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.075-0.075
0.075
MDL
3.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
V
10061-01-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.069-0.069
0.069
MDL
0.47
*
RSL
6.04
No
No
MDL< SL
Cyclohexane
V
110-82-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.065-0.065
0.065
MDL
1300
RSL
123
No
No
MDL< SL
Dibromochloromethane
V
124-48-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.073-0.073
0.073
MDL
0.87
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dichlorodifluoromethane
V
75-71-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.12-0.12
0.12
MDL
20
RSL
0.815
No
No
MDL< SL
Ethylbenzene
V
100-41-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.079-0.079
0.079
MDL
1.5
RSL
4.45
No
No
MDL< SL
-------
Table A2-6
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0182)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0182
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
Isopropylbenzene
V
98-82-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.076-0.076
0.076
MDL
45
RSL
121
No
No
MDL< SL
m,p-Xylene
V
179601-23-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.083-0.083
0.083
MDL
19
*
RSL
45.5
No
No
MDL< SL
Methyl Acetate
V
79-20-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.11 -0.11
0.11
MDL
2000
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Methyl Tert Butyl Ether
V
1634-04-4
0.16
J
0.16
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.053-0.053
0.16
MDC
14
RSL
533
No
No
MDC < SL
Methylcyclohexane
V
108-87-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.08-0.08
0.08
MDL
1300
*
RSL
123
No
No
MDL< SL
Methylene chloride
V
75-09-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.053-0.053
0.053
MDL
11
RSL
555
No
No
MDL< SL
o-Xylene
V
95-47-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.075-0.075
0.075
MDL
19
RSL
63.3
No
No
MDL< SL
Styrene
V
100-42-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.082-0.082
0.082
MDL
120
RSL
1210
No
No
MDL< SL
Tetrachloroethene
V
127-18-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.083-0.083
0.083
MDL
4.1
RSL
7.25
No
No
MDL< SL
Toluene
V
108-88-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.077-0.077
0.077
MDL
110
RSL
2390
No
No
MDL< SL
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
V
156-60-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.081 -0.081
0.081
MDL
6.8
RSL
12.9
No
No
MDL< SL
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
V
10061-02-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.07-0.07
0.07
MDL
0.47
*
RSL
6.04
No
No
MDL< SL
Trichloroethene
V
79-01-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.062-0.062
0.062
MDL
0.28
RSL
0.632
No
No
MDL< SL
Trichlorofluoromethane
V
75-69-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.11 -0.11
0.11
MDL
520
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Vinyl chloride
V
75-01-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.07-0.07
0.07
MDL
0.019
RSL
0.164
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs)
1,1 '-Biphenyl
V
92-52-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.9-1.9
1.9
MDL
0.083
RSL
4.71
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
V
95-94-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
0.017
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1-Methylnaphthalene
V
90-12-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0055-0.0055
0.0055
MDL
1.1
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
58-90-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
24
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
95-95-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
120
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
88-06-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.7-1.7
1.7
MDL
1.2
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2,4-Dichlorophenol
120-83-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
4.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4-Dimethylphenol
105-67-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
36
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4-Dinitrophenol
51-28-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.98-0.98
0.98
MDL
3.9
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
121-14-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.2-2.2
2.2
MDL
0.24
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
606-20-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.9-1.9
1.9
MDL
0.049
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2-Chloronaphthalene
V
91-58-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
75
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Chlorophenol
V
95-57-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
9.1
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Methylnaphthalene
V
91-57-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0066-0.0066
0.0066
MDL
3.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Methylphenol
95-48-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.6-2.6
2.6
MDL
93
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Nitroaniline
88-74-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
"3-
oo
I
oo
3.4
MDL
19
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Nitrophenol
88-75-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.7-2.7
2.7
MDL
0.2
*
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
91-94-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.7-1.7
1.7
MDL
0.13
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
3-Nitroaniline
99-09-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.67-0.67
0.67
MDL
19
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
534-52-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
0.15
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
V
101-55-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
4
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Chloro-3-methyl phenol
59-50-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
140
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Chloroaniline
106-47-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
4.6-4.6
4.6
MDL
0.37
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
V
7005-72-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.4-2.4
2.4
MDL
4
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Methylphenol
106-44-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.6-2.6
2.6
MDL
37
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
-------
Table A2-6
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0182)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0182
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
4-Nitroaniline
100-01-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.85-0.85
0.85
MDL
3.8
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Nitrophenol
100-02-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.4-2.4
2.4
MDL
0.2
*
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Acenaphthene
V
83-32-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0061 -0.0061
0.0061
MDL
53
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Acenaphthylene
V
208-96-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0069-0.0069
0.0069
MDL
53
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Acetophenone
V
98-86-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.2-2.2
2.2
MDL
190
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Anthracene
V
120-12-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.011 -0.011
0.011
MDL
180
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Atrazine
1912-24-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.48-0.48
0.48
MDL
0.3
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Benzaldehyde
V
100-52-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.5-2.5
2.5
MDL
19
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(a)anthracene
V
56-55-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0094-0.0094
0.0094
MDL
0.03
RSL
62.3
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(a)pyrene
50-32-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.017-0.017
0.017
MDL
0.025
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
205-99-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0082-0.0082
0.0082
MDL
0.25
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
V
191-24-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0069-0.0069
0.0069
MDL
12
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
207-08-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0041 -0.0041
0.0041
MDL
2.5
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
111-91-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.9-2.9
2.9
MDL
5.9
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
V
111-44-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
0.014
RSL
17
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
V
108-60-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
71
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
117-81-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.82-0.82
0.82
MDL
5.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Butyl benzyl phthalate
85-68-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.4-1.4
1.4
MDL
16
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Caprolactam
105-60-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.8-1.8
1.8
MDL
990
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Carbazole
V
86-74-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
3.2-3.2
3.2
MDL
29
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Chrysene
218-01-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0054-0.0054
0.0054
MDL
25
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dibenzo(a, h)anthracene
53-70-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0059-0.0059
0.0059
MDL
0.025
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dibenzofuran
V
132-64-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.2-2.2
2.2
MDL
0.79
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Diethyl phthalate
84-66-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
1500
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dimethyl phthalate
131-11-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
1500
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Di-n-butyl phthalate
84-74-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.6-1.6
1.6
MDL
90
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Di-n-octyl phthalate
117-84-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.64-0.64
0.64
MDL
20
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Fluoranthene
206-44-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.012-0.012
0.012
MDL
80
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Fluorene
V
86-73-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0072-0.0072
0.0072
MDL
29
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Hexachlorobenzene
V
118-74-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.9-1.9
1.9
MDL
0.0098
RSL
0.133
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
Hexachlorobutadiene
V
87-68-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.7-1.7
1.7
MDL
0.14
RSL
0.414
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
V
77-47-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.6-1.6
1.6
MDL
0.041
RSL
0.0786
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
Hexachloroethane
V
67-72-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.6-2.6
2.6
MDL
0.33
RSL
2.29
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
193-39-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0069-0.0069
0.0069
MDL
0.25
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Isophorone
78-59-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.8-1.8
1.8
MDL
78
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Naphthalene
V
91-20-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0077-0.0077
0.0077
MDL
0.12
RSL
6.29
No
No
MDL< SL
Nitrobenzene
V
98-95-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.5-2.5
2.5
MDL
0.14
RSL
99.3
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
621-64-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.4-2.4
2.4
MDL
0.011
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
86-30-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
3.6-3.6
3.6
MDL
12
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Pentachlorophenol
87-86-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.024-0.024
0.024
MDL
0.041
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Phenanthrene
V
85-01-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0087-0.0087
0.0087
MDL
180
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
-------
Table A2-6
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0182)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0182
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
Phenol
108-95-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.5-2.5
2.5
MDL
580
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Pyrene
V
129-00-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.014-0.014
0.014
MDL
12
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
DIOX
Total PCDD/F TEQ (Mammal) V TEQ-M-DF N/A N/A |jg/L 0/1 0% N/A N/A - 0.00000012 * RSL 3.61 E-05 No No No values for dioxin TEQ
PCB
Total PCB TEQ (Mammal)
V
TEQ-M-PCB
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
N/A
N/A
-
0.00000012
*
RSL
3.61 E-05
No
No
No values for dioxin TEQ
Total PCB Congener
V
TPCB_CON
0.000036
J
0.000036
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
N/A
0.000036
MDC
0.044
*
RSL
1.65
No
No
MDC < SL
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA)
375-95-1
0.0011
J
0.0011
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.0019-0.0019
0.0011
MDC
0.0059
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS)
355-46-4
0.0078
0.0078
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.0019-0.0019
0.0078
MDC
0.039
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS)
375-73-5
0.052
0.052
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.00038-0.00038
0.052
MDC
0.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
1763-23-1
0.22
0.22
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.0019-0.0019
0.22
MDC
0.004
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
335-67-1
0.013
0.013
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.00038-0.00038
0.013
MDC
0.006
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Total Metals
Aluminum
7429-90-5
19
J
19
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
4-4
19
MDC
2000
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Antimony
7440-36-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.32-0.32
0.32
MDL
0.78
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Arsenic
7440-38-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.33-0.33
0.33
MDL
0.052
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Barium
7440-39-3
180
180
mq/l
1/1
100%
1.9-1.9
180
MDC
380
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Beryllium
7440-41-7
0.27
J
0.27
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.17-0.17
0.27
MDC
2.5
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Cadmium
7440-43-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.14-0.14
0.14
MDL
0.18
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Calcium
7440-70-2
11000
11000
mq/l
1/1
100%
120-120
11000
MDC
Nutrient
N/A
Nutrient
No
No
Classified as an essential nutrient
Chromium, Total
7440-47-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.32-0.32
0.32
MDL
2200
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Chromium, Hexavalent
18540-29-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1-1
1
MDL
0.035
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Cobalt
7440-48-4
25
25
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.19-0.19
25
MDC
0.6
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Copper
7440-50-8
4.6
4.6
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.4-0.4
4.6
MDC
80
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Iron
7439-89-6
470
470
mq/l
1/1
100%
54-54
470
MDC
1400
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Lead
7439-92-1
0.73
J
0.73
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.21 -0.21
0.73
MDC
15
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Manganese
7439-96-5
380
380
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.17-0.17
380
MDC
43
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Mercury
7439-97-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.06-0.06
0.06
MDL
0.2
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Nickel
7440-02-0
2.5
2.5
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.2-0.2
2.5
MDC
39
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Selenium
7782-49-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.2-1.2
1.2
MDL
10
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Silver
7440-22-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.18-0.18
0.18
MDL
9.4
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Thallium
7440-28-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.23-0.23
0.23
MDL
0.02
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Vanadium
7440-62-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.2-1.2
1.2
MDL
8.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Zinc
7440-66-6
16
16
mq/l
1/1
100%
1.6-1.6
16
MDC
600
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Total Cyanide
Cyanide V 57-12-5 3.6 J 3.6 J |jg/L 1/1 100% 2.6-2.6 3.6 MDC 0.15 RSL 20.1 No Yes MDC>SL
Notes:
% = Percent
AL = Action Level
-------
Table A2-6
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0182)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0182
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
CASRN = Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number
COPC = Chemical of Potential Concern
DSA = Data Sensitivity Analysis
HAL = Health Advisory Level
J = Indicates an estimated value
MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level
MDC = Maximum Detected Concentration
N/A = Not Applicable
ND = Non-Detect or Not Detected
"PFOA and PFOS Combined" = Combined total of the detected concentrations of PFOA and PFOS (non-detect results were not included in the summation).
RL = Reporting Limit
RSL = Regional Screening Level
|jg/L = micrograms per liter
USEPA = United States Environmental Protection Agency
(1) "V" indicates that the chemical is volatile.
(2) Groundwater data screened against USEPA Tap Water RSLs, last updated May 2022 (TR = 1E-6, THQ = 0.1).
(3) An asterisk,"*", indicates surrogate toxicity information was used to derive a Screening Level (see Table A2-14).
(4) Groundwater data screened against USEPA Residential Groundwater VI SLs, last updated May 2022 (TR= 1E-6, THQ = 0.1). Site-specific, system temperature was set to 20.5 Celsius (average of recorded temperatures taken infield).
(6) Lead is compared to the EPA tap water RSL of 15 |jg/L, which represents the 90th percentile concentration of lead found in tap water samples collected nationwide (Lead and Copper Rule, 56 Federal Register 26460-26564, dated June 7,1991) and
is not a risk-based number, but rather an action level.
-------
Table A2-7
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0197)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0197
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
V
71-55-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.075-0.075
0.075
MDL
800
RSL
893
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
V
79-34-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.05-0.05
0.05
MDL
0.076
RSL
4.18
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
V
79-00-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.042-0.042
0.042
MDL
0.041
RSL
0.779
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane (Freon 113)
V
76-13-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.099-0.099
0.099
MDL
1000
RSL
28.5
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1-Dichloroethane
V
75-34-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.058-0.058
0.058
MDL
2.8
RSL
9.09
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1-Dichloroethene
V
75-35-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.064-0.064
0.064
MDL
28
RSL
22.7
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
V
87-61-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.076-0.076
0.076
MDL
0.7
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
V
96-18-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.077-0.077
0.077
MDL
0.00075
RSL
2.89
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
V
120-82-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.068-0.068
0.068
MDL
0.4
RSL
4.97
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
V
95-63-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.051 -0.051
0.051
MDL
5.6
RSL
33
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
V
96-12-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.14-0.14
0.14
MDL
0.00033
RSL
0.0381
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2-Dibromoethane
V
106-93-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.052-0.052
0.052
MDL
0.0075
RSL
0.221
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
V
95-50-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.045-0.045
0.045
MDL
30
RSL
351
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2-Dichloroethane
V
107-06-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.079-0.079
0.079
MDL
0.17
RSL
2.74
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2-Dichloropropane
V
78-87-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.069-0.069
0.069
MDL
0.82
RSL
4.44
No
No
MDL< SL
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
V
108-67-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.067-0.067
0.067
MDL
6
RSL
23.2
No
No
MDL< SL
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
V
541-73-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.071 -0.071
0.071
MDL
30
*
RSL
351
No
No
MDL< SL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
V
106-46-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.047-0.047
0.047
MDL
0.48
RSL
3.42
No
No
MDL< SL
1,4-Dioxane
V
123-91-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.9-0.9
0.9
MDL
0.46
RSL
3570
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2-Butanone (MEK)
V
78-93-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
lo
I
lo
1.5
MDL
560
RSL
274000
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Hexanone
V
591-78-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.68-0.68
0.68
MDL
3.8
RSL
1060
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
V
108-10-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
O
I
o
0.71
MDL
630
RSL
70200
No
No
MDL< SL
Acetone
V
67-64-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
1800
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzene
V
71-43-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.085-0.085
0.085
MDL
0.46
RSL
1.92
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromochloromethane
V
74-97-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.064-0.064
0.064
MDL
8.3
RSL
83.9
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromodichloromethane
V
75-27-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.062-0.062
0.062
MDL
0.13
RSL
1.08
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromoform
V
75-25-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.095-0.095
0.095
MDL
3.3
RSL
152
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromomethane
V
74-83-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.058-0.058
0.058
MDL
0.75
RSL
1.98
No
No
MDL< SL
Carbon disulfide
V
75-15-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.092-0.092
0.092
MDL
81
RSL
145
No
No
MDL< SL
Carbon tetrachloride
V
56-23-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.086-0.086
0.086
MDL
0.46
RSL
0.499
No
No
MDL< SL
Chlorobenzene
V
108-90-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.064-0.064
0.064
MDL
7.8
RSL
51.9
No
No
MDL< SL
Chloroethane
V
75-00-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.074-0.074
0.074
MDL
830
RSL
1050
No
No
MDL< SL
Chloroform
V
67-66-3
0.51
0.51
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.079-0.079
0.51
MDC
0.22
RSL
0.972
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Chloromethane
V
74-87-3
0.19
J
0.19
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.082-0.082
0.19
MDC
19
RSL
28.9
No
No
MDC < SL
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
V
156-59-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.075-0.075
0.075
MDL
3.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
V
10061-01-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.069-0.069
0.069
MDL
0.47
*
RSL
6.04
No
No
MDL< SL
Cyclohexane
V
110-82-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.065-0.065
0.065
MDL
1300
RSL
123
No
No
MDL< SL
Dibromochloromethane
V
124-48-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.073-0.073
0.073
MDL
0.87
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dichlorodifluoromethane
V
75-71-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.12-0.12
0.12
MDL
20
RSL
0.815
No
No
MDL< SL
Ethylbenzene
V
100-41-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.079-0.079
0.079
MDL
1.5
RSL
4.45
No
No
MDL< SL
-------
Table A2-7
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0197)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0197
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
Isopropylbenzene
V
98-82-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.076-0.076
0.076
MDL
45
RSL
121
No
No
MDL< SL
m,p-Xylene
V
179601-23-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.083-0.083
0.083
MDL
19
*
RSL
45.5
No
No
MDL< SL
Methyl Acetate
V
79-20-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.11 -0.11
0.11
MDL
2000
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Methyl Tert Butyl Ether
V
1634-04-4
0.13
J
0.13
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.053-0.053
0.13
MDC
14
RSL
533
No
No
MDC < SL
Methylcyclohexane
V
108-87-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.08-0.08
0.08
MDL
1300
*
RSL
123
No
No
MDL< SL
Methylene chloride
V
75-09-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.053-0.053
0.053
MDL
11
RSL
555
No
No
MDL< SL
o-Xylene
V
95-47-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.075-0.075
0.075
MDL
19
RSL
63.3
No
No
MDL< SL
Styrene
V
100-42-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.082-0.082
0.082
MDL
120
RSL
1210
No
No
MDL< SL
Tetrachloroethene
V
127-18-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.083-0.083
0.083
MDL
4.1
RSL
7.25
No
No
MDL< SL
Toluene
V
108-88-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.077-0.077
0.077
MDL
110
RSL
2390
No
No
MDL< SL
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
V
156-60-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.081 -0.081
0.081
MDL
6.8
RSL
12.9
No
No
MDL< SL
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
V
10061-02-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.07-0.07
0.07
MDL
0.47
*
RSL
6.04
No
No
MDL< SL
Trichloroethene
V
79-01-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.062-0.062
0.062
MDL
0.28
RSL
0.632
No
No
MDL< SL
Trichlorofluoromethane
V
75-69-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.11 -0.11
0.11
MDL
520
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Vinyl chloride
V
75-01-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.07-0.07
0.07
MDL
0.019
RSL
0.164
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs)
1,1 '-Biphenyl
V
92-52-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.9-1.9
1.9
MDL
0.083
RSL
4.71
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
V
95-94-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
0.017
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1-Methylnaphthalene
V
90-12-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0055-0.0055
0.0055
MDL
1.1
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
58-90-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
24
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
95-95-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
120
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
88-06-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.7-1.7
1.7
MDL
1.2
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2,4-Dichlorophenol
120-83-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
4.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4-Dimethylphenol
105-67-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
36
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4-Dinitrophenol
51-28-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.98-0.98
0.98
MDL
3.9
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
121-14-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.2-2.2
2.2
MDL
0.24
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
606-20-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.9-1.9
1.9
MDL
0.049
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2-Chloronaphthalene
V
91-58-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
75
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Chlorophenol
V
95-57-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
9.1
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Methylnaphthalene
V
91-57-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0066-0.0066
0.0066
MDL
3.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Methylphenol
95-48-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.6-2.6
2.6
MDL
93
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Nitroaniline
88-74-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
"3-
oo
I
oo
3.4
MDL
19
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Nitrophenol
88-75-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.7-2.7
2.7
MDL
0.2
*
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
91-94-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.7-1.7
1.7
MDL
0.13
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
3-Nitroaniline
99-09-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.67-0.67
0.67
MDL
19
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
534-52-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
0.15
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
V
101-55-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
4
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Chloro-3-methyl phenol
59-50-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
140
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Chloroaniline
106-47-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
4.6-4.6
4.6
MDL
0.37
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
V
7005-72-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.4-2.4
2.4
MDL
4
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Methylphenol
106-44-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.6-2.6
2.6
MDL
37
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
-------
Table A2-7
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0197)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0197
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
4-Nitroaniline
100-01-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.85-0.85
0.85
MDL
3.8
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Nitrophenol
100-02-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.4-2.4
2.4
MDL
0.2
*
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Acenaphthene
V
83-32-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0061 -0.0061
0.0061
MDL
53
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Acenaphthylene
V
208-96-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0069-0.0069
0.0069
MDL
53
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Acetophenone
V
98-86-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.2-2.2
2.2
MDL
190
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Anthracene
V
120-12-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.011 -0.011
0.011
MDL
180
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Atrazine
1912-24-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.48-0.48
0.48
MDL
0.3
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Benzaldehyde
V
100-52-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.5-2.5
2.5
MDL
19
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(a)anthracene
V
56-55-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0094-0.0094
0.0094
MDL
0.03
RSL
62.3
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(a)pyrene
50-32-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.017-0.017
0.017
MDL
0.025
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
205-99-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0082-0.0082
0.0082
MDL
0.25
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
V
191-24-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0069-0.0069
0.0069
MDL
12
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
207-08-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0041 -0.0041
0.0041
MDL
2.5
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
111-91-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.9-2.9
2.9
MDL
5.9
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
V
111-44-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
0.014
RSL
17
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
V
108-60-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
71
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
117-81-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.82-0.82
0.82
MDL
5.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Butyl benzyl phthalate
85-68-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.4-1.4
1.4
MDL
16
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Caprolactam
105-60-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.8-1.8
1.8
MDL
990
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Carbazole
V
86-74-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
3.2-3.2
3.2
MDL
29
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Chrysene
218-01-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0054-0.0054
0.0054
MDL
25
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dibenzo(a, h)anthracene
53-70-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0059-0.0059
0.0059
MDL
0.025
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dibenzofuran
V
132-64-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.2-2.2
2.2
MDL
0.79
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Diethyl phthalate
84-66-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
1500
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dimethyl phthalate
131-11-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
1500
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Di-n-butyl phthalate
84-74-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.6-1.6
1.6
MDL
90
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Di-n-octyl phthalate
117-84-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.64-0.64
0.64
MDL
20
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Fluoranthene
206-44-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.012-0.012
0.012
MDL
80
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Fluorene
V
86-73-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0072-0.0072
0.0072
MDL
29
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Hexachlorobenzene
V
118-74-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.9-1.9
1.9
MDL
0.0098
RSL
0.133
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
Hexachlorobutadiene
V
87-68-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.7-1.7
1.7
MDL
0.14
RSL
0.414
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
V
77-47-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.6-1.6
1.6
MDL
0.041
RSL
0.0786
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
Hexachloroethane
V
67-72-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.6-2.6
2.6
MDL
0.33
RSL
2.29
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
193-39-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0069-0.0069
0.0069
MDL
0.25
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Isophorone
78-59-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.8-1.8
1.8
MDL
78
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Naphthalene
V
91-20-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0077-0.0077
0.0077
MDL
0.12
RSL
6.29
No
No
MDL< SL
Nitrobenzene
V
98-95-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.5-2.5
2.5
MDL
0.14
RSL
99.3
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
621-64-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.4-2.4
2.4
MDL
0.011
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
86-30-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
3.6-3.6
3.6
MDL
12
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Pentachlorophenol
87-86-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.024-0.024
0.024
MDL
0.041
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Phenanthrene
V
85-01-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0087-0.0087
0.0087
MDL
180
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
-------
Table A2-7
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0197)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0197
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
Phenol
108-95-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.5-2.5
2.5
MDL
580
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Pyrene
V
129-00-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.014-0.014
0.014
MDL
12
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
DIOX
Total PCDD/F TEQ (Mammal) V TEQ-M-DF N/A N/A |jg/L 0/1 0% N/A N/A - 0.00000012 * RSL 3.61 E-05 No No No values for dioxin TEQ
PCB
Total PCB TEQ (Mammal)
V
TEQ-M-PCB
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
N/A
N/A
-
0.00000012
*
RSL
3.61 E-05
No
No
No values for dioxin TEQ
Total PCB Congener
V
TPCB_CON
0.000041
J
0.000041
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
N/A
0.000041
MDC
0.044
*
RSL
1.65
No
No
MDC < SL
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA)
375-95-1
0.0024
0.0024
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.0019-0.0019
0.0024
MDC
0.0059
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS)
355-46-4
0.0084
0.0084
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.0019-0.0019
0.0084
MDC
0.039
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS)
375-73-5
0.05
0.05
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.00037-0.00037
0.05
MDC
0.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
1763-23-1
0.15
0.15
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.0019-0.0019
0.15
MDC
0.004
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
335-67-1
0.016
0.016
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.00037-0.00037
0.016
MDC
0.006
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Total Metals
Aluminum
7429-90-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
4-4
4
MDL
2000
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Antimony
7440-36-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.32-0.32
0.32
MDL
0.78
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Arsenic
7440-38-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.33-0.33
0.33
MDL
0.052
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Barium
7440-39-3
160
160
mq/l
1/1
100%
1.9-1.9
160
MDC
380
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Beryllium
7440-41-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.17-0.17
0.17
MDL
2.5
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Cadmium
7440-43-9
0.33
J
0.33
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.14-0.14
0.33
MDC
0.18
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Calcium
7440-70-2
12000
12000
mq/l
1/1
100%
120-120
12000
MDC
Nutrient
N/A
Nutrient
No
No
Classified as an essential nutrient
Chromium, Total
7440-47-3
0.46
J
0.46
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.32-0.32
0.46
MDC
2200
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Chromium, Hexavalent
18540-29-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1-1
1
MDL
0.035
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Cobalt
7440-48-4
13
13
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.19-0.19
13
MDC
0.6
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Copper
7440-50-8
17
17
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.4-0.4
17
MDC
80
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Iron
7439-89-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
54-54
54
MDL
1400
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Lead
7439-92-1
0.47
J
0.47
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.21 -0.21
0.47
MDC
15
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Manganese
7439-96-5
180
180
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.17-0.17
180
MDC
43
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Mercury
7439-97-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.06-0.06
0.06
MDL
0.2
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Nickel
7440-02-0
1.8
1.8
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.2-0.2
1.8
MDC
39
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Selenium
7782-49-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.2-1.2
1.2
MDL
10
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Silver
7440-22-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.18-0.18
0.18
MDL
9.4
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Thallium
7440-28-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.23-0.23
0.23
MDL
0.02
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Vanadium
7440-62-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.2-1.2
1.2
MDL
8.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Zinc
7440-66-6
18
18
mq/l
1/1
100%
1.6-1.6
18
MDC
600
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Total Cyanide
Cyanide V 57-12-5 3.2 J 3.2 J |jg/L 1/1 100% 2.6-2.6 3.2 MDC 0.15 RSL 20.1 No Yes MDC>SL
Notes:
% = Percent
AL = Action Level
-------
Table A2-7
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0197)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0197
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
CASRN = Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number
COPC = Chemical of Potential Concern
DSA = Data Sensitivity Analysis
HAL = Health Advisory Level
J = Indicates an estimated value
MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level
MDC = Maximum Detected Concentration
N/A = Not Applicable
ND = Non-Detect or Not Detected
"PFOA and PFOS Combined" = Combined total of the detected concentrations of PFOA and PFOS (non-detect results were not included in the summation).
RL = Reporting Limit
RSL = Regional Screening Level
|jg/L = micrograms per liter
USEPA = United States Environmental Protection Agency
(1) "V" indicates that the chemical is volatile.
(2) Groundwater data screened against USEPA Tap Water RSLs, last updated May 2022 (TR = 1E-6, THQ = 0.1).
(3) An asterisk,"*", indicates surrogate toxicity information was used to derive a Screening Level (see Table A2-14).
(4) Groundwater data screened against USEPA Residential Groundwater VI SLs, last updated May 2022 (TR= 1E-6, THQ = 0.1). Site-specific, system temperature was set to 20.5 Celsius (average of recorded temperatures taken infield).
(6) Lead is compared to the EPA tap water RSL of 15 |jg/L, which represents the 90th percentile concentration of lead found in tap water samples collected nationwide (Lead and Copper Rule, 56 Federal Register 26460-26564, dated June 7,1991) and
is not a risk-based number, but rather an action level.
-------
Table A2-8
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0212)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0212
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
V
71-55-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.075-0.075
0.075
MDL
800
RSL
893
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
V
79-34-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.05-0.05
0.05
MDL
0.076
RSL
4.18
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
V
79-00-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.042-0.042
0.042
MDL
0.041
RSL
0.779
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane (Freon 113)
V
76-13-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.099-0.099
0.099
MDL
1000
RSL
28.5
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1-Dichloroethane
V
75-34-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.058-0.058
0.058
MDL
2.8
RSL
9.09
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1-Dichloroethene
V
75-35-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.064-0.064
0.064
MDL
28
RSL
22.7
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
V
87-61-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.076-0.076
0.076
MDL
0.7
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
V
96-18-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.077-0.077
0.077
MDL
0.00075
RSL
2.89
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
V
120-82-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.068-0.068
0.068
MDL
0.4
RSL
4.97
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
V
95-63-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.051 -0.051
0.051
MDL
5.6
RSL
33
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
V
96-12-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.14-0.14
0.14
MDL
0.00033
RSL
0.0381
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2-Dibromoethane
V
106-93-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.052-0.052
0.052
MDL
0.0075
RSL
0.221
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
V
95-50-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.045-0.045
0.045
MDL
30
RSL
351
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2-Dichloroethane
V
107-06-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.079-0.079
0.079
MDL
0.17
RSL
2.74
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2-Dichloropropane
V
78-87-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.069-0.069
0.069
MDL
0.82
RSL
4.44
No
No
MDL< SL
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
V
108-67-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.067-0.067
0.067
MDL
6
RSL
23.2
No
No
MDL< SL
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
V
541-73-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.071 -0.071
0.071
MDL
30
*
RSL
351
No
No
MDL< SL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
V
106-46-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.047-0.047
0.047
MDL
0.48
RSL
3.42
No
No
MDL< SL
1,4-Dioxane
V
123-91-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.9-0.9
0.9
MDL
0.46
RSL
3570
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2-Butanone (MEK)
V
78-93-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
lo
I
lo
1.5
MDL
560
RSL
274000
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Hexanone
V
591-78-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.68-0.68
0.68
MDL
3.8
RSL
1060
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
V
108-10-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
O
I
o
0.71
MDL
630
RSL
70200
No
No
MDL< SL
Acetone
V
67-64-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
1800
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzene
V
71-43-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.085-0.085
0.085
MDL
0.46
RSL
1.92
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromochloromethane
V
74-97-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.064-0.064
0.064
MDL
8.3
RSL
83.9
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromodichloromethane
V
75-27-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.062-0.062
0.062
MDL
0.13
RSL
1.08
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromoform
V
75-25-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.095-0.095
0.095
MDL
3.3
RSL
152
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromomethane
V
74-83-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.058-0.058
0.058
MDL
0.75
RSL
1.98
No
No
MDL< SL
Carbon disulfide
V
75-15-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.092-0.092
0.092
MDL
81
RSL
145
No
No
MDL< SL
Carbon tetrachloride
V
56-23-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.086-0.086
0.086
MDL
0.46
RSL
0.499
No
No
MDL< SL
Chlorobenzene
V
108-90-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.064-0.064
0.064
MDL
7.8
RSL
51.9
No
No
MDL< SL
Chloroethane
V
75-00-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.074-0.074
0.074
MDL
830
RSL
1050
No
No
MDL< SL
Chloroform
V
67-66-3
0.28
J
0.28
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.079-0.079
0.28
MDC
0.22
RSL
0.972
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Chloromethane
V
74-87-3
0.24
J
0.24
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.082-0.082
0.24
MDC
19
RSL
28.9
No
No
MDC < SL
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
V
156-59-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.075-0.075
0.075
MDL
3.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
V
10061-01-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.069-0.069
0.069
MDL
0.47
*
RSL
6.04
No
No
MDL< SL
Cyclohexane
V
110-82-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.065-0.065
0.065
MDL
1300
RSL
123
No
No
MDL< SL
Dibromochloromethane
V
124-48-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.073-0.073
0.073
MDL
0.87
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dichlorodifluoromethane
V
75-71-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.12-0.12
0.12
MDL
20
RSL
0.815
No
No
MDL< SL
Ethylbenzene
V
100-41-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.079-0.079
0.079
MDL
1.5
RSL
4.45
No
No
MDL< SL
-------
Table A2-8
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0212)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0212
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
Isopropylbenzene
V
98-82-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.076-0.076
0.076
MDL
45
RSL
121
No
No
MDL< SL
m,p-Xylene
V
179601-23-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.083-0.083
0.083
MDL
19
*
RSL
45.5
No
No
MDL< SL
Methyl Acetate
V
79-20-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.11 -0.11
0.11
MDL
2000
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Methyl Tert Butyl Ether
V
1634-04-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.053-0.053
0.053
MDL
14
RSL
533
No
No
MDL< SL
Methylcyclohexane
V
108-87-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.08-0.08
0.08
MDL
1300
*
RSL
123
No
No
MDL< SL
Methylene chloride
V
75-09-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.053-0.053
0.053
MDL
11
RSL
555
No
No
MDL< SL
o-Xylene
V
95-47-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.075-0.075
0.075
MDL
19
RSL
63.3
No
No
MDL< SL
Styrene
V
100-42-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.082-0.082
0.082
MDL
120
RSL
1210
No
No
MDL< SL
Tetrachloroethene
V
127-18-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.083-0.083
0.083
MDL
4.1
RSL
7.25
No
No
MDL< SL
Toluene
V
108-88-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.077-0.077
0.077
MDL
110
RSL
2390
No
No
MDL< SL
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
V
156-60-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.081 -0.081
0.081
MDL
6.8
RSL
12.9
No
No
MDL< SL
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
V
10061-02-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.07-0.07
0.07
MDL
0.47
*
RSL
6.04
No
No
MDL< SL
Trichloroethene
V
79-01-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.062-0.062
0.062
MDL
0.28
RSL
0.632
No
No
MDL< SL
Trichlorofluoromethane
V
75-69-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.11 -0.11
0.11
MDL
520
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Vinyl chloride
V
75-01-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.07-0.07
0.07
MDL
0.019
RSL
0.164
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs)
1,1 '-Biphenyl
V
92-52-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.9-1.9
1.9
MDL
0.083
RSL
4.71
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
V
95-94-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
0.017
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1-Methylnaphthalene
V
90-12-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0055-0.0055
0.0055
MDL
1.1
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
58-90-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
24
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
95-95-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
120
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
88-06-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.7-1.7
1.7
MDL
1.2
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2,4-Dichlorophenol
120-83-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
4.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4-Dimethylphenol
105-67-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
36
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4-Dinitrophenol
51-28-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.98-0.98
0.98
MDL
3.9
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
121-14-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.2-2.2
2.2
MDL
0.24
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
606-20-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.9-1.9
1.9
MDL
0.049
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2-Chloronaphthalene
V
91-58-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
75
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Chlorophenol
V
95-57-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
9.1
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Methylnaphthalene
V
91-57-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0066-0.0066
0.0066
MDL
3.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Methylphenol
95-48-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.6-2.6
2.6
MDL
93
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Nitroaniline
88-74-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
"3-
oo
I
oo
3.4
MDL
19
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Nitrophenol
88-75-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.7-2.7
2.7
MDL
0.2
*
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
91-94-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.7-1.7
1.7
MDL
0.13
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
3-Nitroaniline
99-09-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.67-0.67
0.67
MDL
19
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
534-52-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
0.15
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
V
101-55-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
4
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Chloro-3-methyl phenol
59-50-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
140
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Chloroaniline
106-47-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
4.6-4.6
4.6
MDL
0.37
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
V
7005-72-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.4-2.4
2.4
MDL
4
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Methylphenol
106-44-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.6-2.6
2.6
MDL
37
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
-------
Table A2-8
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0212)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0212
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
4-Nitroaniline
100-01-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.85-0.85
0.85
MDL
3.8
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Nitrophenol
100-02-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.4-2.4
2.4
MDL
0.2
*
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Acenaphthene
V
83-32-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0061 -0.0061
0.0061
MDL
53
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Acenaphthylene
V
208-96-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0069-0.0069
0.0069
MDL
53
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Acetophenone
V
98-86-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.2-2.2
2.2
MDL
190
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Anthracene
V
120-12-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.011 -0.011
0.011
MDL
180
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Atrazine
1912-24-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.48-0.48
0.48
MDL
0.3
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Benzaldehyde
V
100-52-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.5-2.5
2.5
MDL
19
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(a)anthracene
V
56-55-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0094-0.0094
0.0094
MDL
0.03
RSL
62.3
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(a)pyrene
50-32-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.017-0.017
0.017
MDL
0.025
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
205-99-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0082-0.0082
0.0082
MDL
0.25
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
V
191-24-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0069-0.0069
0.0069
MDL
12
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
207-08-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0041 -0.0041
0.0041
MDL
2.5
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
111-91-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.9-2.9
2.9
MDL
5.9
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
V
111-44-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
0.014
RSL
17
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
V
108-60-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
71
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
117-81-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.82-0.82
0.82
MDL
5.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Butyl benzyl phthalate
85-68-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.4-1.4
1.4
MDL
16
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Caprolactam
105-60-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.8-1.8
1.8
MDL
990
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Carbazole
V
86-74-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
3.2-3.2
3.2
MDL
29
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Chrysene
218-01-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0054-0.0054
0.0054
MDL
25
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dibenzo(a, h)anthracene
53-70-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0059-0.0059
0.0059
MDL
0.025
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dibenzofuran
V
132-64-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.2-2.2
2.2
MDL
0.79
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Diethyl phthalate
84-66-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
1500
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dimethyl phthalate
131-11-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
1500
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Di-n-butyl phthalate
84-74-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.6-1.6
1.6
MDL
90
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Di-n-octyl phthalate
117-84-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.64-0.64
0.64
MDL
20
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Fluoranthene
206-44-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.012-0.012
0.012
MDL
80
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Fluorene
V
86-73-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0072-0.0072
0.0072
MDL
29
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Hexachlorobenzene
V
118-74-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.9-1.9
1.9
MDL
0.0098
RSL
0.133
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
Hexachlorobutadiene
V
87-68-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.7-1.7
1.7
MDL
0.14
RSL
0.414
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
V
77-47-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.6-1.6
1.6
MDL
0.041
RSL
0.0786
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
Hexachloroethane
V
67-72-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.6-2.6
2.6
MDL
0.33
RSL
2.29
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
193-39-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0069-0.0069
0.0069
MDL
0.25
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Isophorone
78-59-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.8-1.8
1.8
MDL
78
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Naphthalene
V
91-20-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0077-0.0077
0.0077
MDL
0.12
RSL
6.29
No
No
MDL< SL
Nitrobenzene
V
98-95-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.5-2.5
2.5
MDL
0.14
RSL
99.3
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
621-64-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.4-2.4
2.4
MDL
0.011
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
86-30-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
3.6-3.6
3.6
MDL
12
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Pentachlorophenol
87-86-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.024-0.024
0.024
MDL
0.041
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Phenanthrene
V
85-01-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0087-0.0087
0.0087
MDL
180
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
-------
Table A2-8
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0212)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0212
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
Phenol
108-95-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.5-2.5
2.5
MDL
580
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Pyrene
V
129-00-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.014-0.014
0.014
MDL
12
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
DIOX
Total PCDD/F TEQ (Mammal) V TEQ-M-DF N/A N/A |jg/L 0/1 0% N/A N/A - 0.00000012 * RSL 3.61 E-05 No No No values for dioxin TEQ
PCB
Total PCB TEQ (Mammal)
V
TEQ-M-PCB
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
N/A
N/A
-
0.00000012
*
RSL
3.61 E-05
No
No
No values for dioxin TEQ
Total PCB Congener
V
TPCB_CON
0.000061
J
0.000061
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
N/A
0.000061
MDC
0.044
*
RSL
1.65
No
No
MDC < SL
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA)
375-95-1
0.0034
0.0034
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.0019-0.0019
0.0034
MDC
0.0059
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS)
355-46-4
0.0024
0.0024
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.0019-0.0019
0.0024
MDC
0.039
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS)
375-73-5
0.0096
0.0096
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.00037-0.00037
0.0096
MDC
0.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
1763-23-1
0.057
0.057
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.00037-0.00037
0.057
MDC
0.004
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
335-67-1
0.011
0.011
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.00037-0.00037
0.011
MDC
0.006
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Total Metals
Aluminum
7429-90-5
130
130
mq/l
1/1
100%
4-4
130
MDC
2000
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Antimony
7440-36-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.32-0.32
0.32
MDL
0.78
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Arsenic
7440-38-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.33-0.33
0.33
MDL
0.052
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Barium
7440-39-3
67
67
mq/l
1/1
100%
1.9-1.9
67
MDC
380
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Beryllium
7440-41-7
0.27
J
0.27
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.17-0.17
0.27
MDC
2.5
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Cadmium
7440-43-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.14-0.14
0.14
MDL
0.18
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Calcium
7440-70-2
7100
7100
mq/l
1/1
100%
120-120
7100
MDC
Nutrient
N/A
Nutrient
No
No
Classified as an essential nutrient
Chromium, Total
7440-47-3
0.39
J
0.39
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.32-0.32
0.39
MDC
2200
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Chromium, Hexavalent
18540-29-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1-1
1
MDL
0.035
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Cobalt
7440-48-4
1.6
1.6
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.19-0.19
1.6
MDC
0.6
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Copper
7440-50-8
290
290
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.4-0.4
290
MDC
80
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Iron
7439-89-6
810
810
mq/l
1/1
100%
54-54
810
MDC
1400
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Lead
7439-92-1
16
16
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.21 -0.21
16
MDC
15
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Manganese
7439-96-5
24
J+
24
J+
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.17-0.17
24
MDC
43
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Mercury
7439-97-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.06-0.06
0.06
MDL
0.2
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Nickel
7440-02-0
2.1
2.1
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.2-0.2
2.1
MDC
39
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Selenium
7782-49-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.2-1.2
1.2
MDL
10
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Silver
7440-22-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.18-0.18
0.18
MDL
9.4
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Thallium
7440-28-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.23-0.23
0.23
MDL
0.02
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Vanadium
7440-62-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.2-1.2
1.2
MDL
8.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Zinc
7440-66-6
72
72
mq/l
1/1
100%
1.6-1.6
72
MDC
600
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Total Cyanide
Cyanide V 57-12-5 N/A N/A |jg/L 0/1 0% 2.6-2.6 2.6 MDL 0.15 RSL 20.1 No See DSA MDL > SL
Notes:
% = Percent
AL = Action Level
-------
Table A2-8
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0212)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0212
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
CASRN = Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number
COPC = Chemical of Potential Concern
DSA = Data Sensitivity Analysis
HAL = Health Advisory Level
J = Indicates an estimated value
J+ = The result is an estimated quantity, but the result may be biased high.
MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level
MDC = Maximum Detected Concentration
N/A = Not Applicable
ND = Non-Detect or Not Detected
"PFOA and PFOS Combined" = Combined total of the detected concentrations of PFOA and PFOS (non-detect results were not included in the summation).
RL = Reporting Limit
RSL = Regional Screening Level
|jg/L = micrograms per liter
USEPA = United States Environmental Protection Agency
(1) "V" indicates that the chemical is volatile.
(2) Groundwater data screened against USEPA Tap Water RSLs, last updated May 2022 (TR = 1E-6, THQ = 0.1).
(3) An asterisk,"*", indicates surrogate toxicity information was used to derive a Screening Level (see Table A2-14).
(4) Groundwater data screened against USEPA Residential Groundwater VI SLs, last updated May 2022 (TR= 1E-6, THQ = 0.1). Site-specific, system temperature was set to 20.5 Celsius (average of recorded temperatures taken infield).
(6) Lead is compared to the EPA tap water RSL of 15 |jg/L, which represents the 90th percentile concentration of lead found in tap water samples collected nationwide (Lead and Copper Rule, 56 Federal Register 26460-26564, dated June 7,1991) and
is not a risk-based number, but rather an action level.
-------
Table A2-9
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0275)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0275
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
V
71-55-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.075-0.075
0.075
MDL
800
RSL
893
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
V
79-34-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.05-0.05
0.05
MDL
0.076
RSL
4.18
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
V
79-00-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.042-0.042
0.042
MDL
0.041
RSL
0.779
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane (Freon 113)
V
76-13-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.099-0.099
0.099
MDL
1000
RSL
28.5
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1-Dichloroethane
V
75-34-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.058-0.058
0.058
MDL
2.8
RSL
9.09
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1-Dichloroethene
V
75-35-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.064-0.064
0.064
MDL
28
RSL
22.7
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
V
87-61-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.076-0.076
0.076
MDL
0.7
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
V
96-18-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.077-0.077
0.077
MDL
0.00075
RSL
2.89
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
V
120-82-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.068-0.068
0.068
MDL
0.4
RSL
4.97
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
V
95-63-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.051 -0.051
0.051
MDL
5.6
RSL
33
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
V
96-12-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.14-0.14
0.14
MDL
0.00033
RSL
0.0381
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2-Dibromoethane
V
106-93-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.052-0.052
0.052
MDL
0.0075
RSL
0.221
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
V
95-50-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.045-0.045
0.045
MDL
30
RSL
351
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2-Dichloroethane
V
107-06-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.079-0.079
0.079
MDL
0.17
RSL
2.74
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2-Dichloropropane
V
78-87-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.069-0.069
0.069
MDL
0.82
RSL
4.44
No
No
MDL< SL
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
V
108-67-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.067-0.067
0.067
MDL
6
RSL
23.2
No
No
MDL< SL
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
V
541-73-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.071 -0.071
0.071
MDL
30
*
RSL
351
No
No
MDL< SL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
V
106-46-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.047-0.047
0.047
MDL
0.48
RSL
3.42
No
No
MDL< SL
1,4-Dioxane
V
123-91-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.9-0.9
0.9
MDL
0.46
RSL
3570
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2-Butanone (MEK)
V
78-93-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
lo
I
lo
1.5
MDL
560
RSL
274000
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Hexanone
V
591-78-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.68-0.68
0.68
MDL
3.8
RSL
1060
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
V
108-10-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
O
I
o
0.71
MDL
630
RSL
70200
No
No
MDL< SL
Acetone
V
67-64-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
1800
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzene
V
71-43-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.085-0.085
0.085
MDL
0.46
RSL
1.92
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromochloromethane
V
74-97-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.064-0.064
0.064
MDL
8.3
RSL
83.9
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromodichloromethane
V
75-27-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.062-0.062
0.062
MDL
0.13
RSL
1.08
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromoform
V
75-25-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.095-0.095
0.095
MDL
3.3
RSL
152
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromomethane
V
74-83-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.058-0.058
0.058
MDL
0.75
RSL
1.98
No
No
MDL< SL
Carbon disulfide
V
75-15-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.092-0.092
0.092
MDL
81
RSL
145
No
No
MDL< SL
Carbon tetrachloride
V
56-23-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.086-0.086
0.086
MDL
0.46
RSL
0.499
No
No
MDL< SL
Chlorobenzene
V
108-90-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.064-0.064
0.064
MDL
7.8
RSL
51.9
No
No
MDL< SL
Chloroethane
V
75-00-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.074-0.074
0.074
MDL
830
RSL
1050
No
No
MDL< SL
Chloroform
V
67-66-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.079-0.079
0.079
MDL
0.22
RSL
0.972
No
No
MDL< SL
Chloromethane
V
74-87-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.082-0.082
0.082
MDL
19
RSL
28.9
No
No
MDL< SL
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
V
156-59-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.075-0.075
0.075
MDL
3.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
V
10061-01-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.069-0.069
0.069
MDL
0.47
*
RSL
6.04
No
No
MDL< SL
Cyclohexane
V
110-82-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.065-0.065
0.065
MDL
1300
RSL
123
No
No
MDL< SL
Dibromochloromethane
V
124-48-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.073-0.073
0.073
MDL
0.87
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dichlorodifluoromethane
V
75-71-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.12-0.12
0.12
MDL
20
RSL
0.815
No
No
MDL< SL
Ethylbenzene
V
100-41-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.079-0.079
0.079
MDL
1.5
RSL
4.45
No
No
MDL< SL
-------
Table A2-9
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0275)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0275
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
Isopropylbenzene
V
98-82-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.076-0.076
0.076
MDL
45
RSL
121
No
No
MDL< SL
m,p-Xylene
V
179601-23-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.083-0.083
0.083
MDL
19
*
RSL
45.5
No
No
MDL< SL
Methyl Acetate
V
79-20-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.11 -0.11
0.11
MDL
2000
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Methyl Tert Butyl Ether
V
1634-04-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.053-0.053
0.053
MDL
14
RSL
533
No
No
MDL< SL
Methylcyclohexane
V
108-87-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.08-0.08
0.08
MDL
1300
*
RSL
123
No
No
MDL< SL
Methylene chloride
V
75-09-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.053-0.053
0.053
MDL
11
RSL
555
No
No
MDL< SL
o-Xylene
V
95-47-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.075-0.075
0.075
MDL
19
RSL
63.3
No
No
MDL< SL
Styrene
V
100-42-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.082-0.082
0.082
MDL
120
RSL
1210
No
No
MDL< SL
Tetrachloroethene
V
127-18-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.083-0.083
0.083
MDL
4.1
RSL
7.25
No
No
MDL< SL
Toluene
V
108-88-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.077-0.077
0.077
MDL
110
RSL
2390
No
No
MDL< SL
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
V
156-60-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.081 -0.081
0.081
MDL
6.8
RSL
12.9
No
No
MDL< SL
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
V
10061-02-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.07-0.07
0.07
MDL
0.47
*
RSL
6.04
No
No
MDL< SL
Trichloroethene
V
79-01-6
0.068
J
0.068
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.062-0.062
0.068
MDC
0.28
RSL
0.632
No
No
MDC < SL
Trichlorofluoromethane
V
75-69-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.11 -0.11
0.11
MDL
520
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Vinyl chloride
V
75-01-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.07-0.07
0.07
MDL
0.019
RSL
0.164
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs)
1,1 '-Biphenyl
V
92-52-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.9-1.9
1.9
MDL
0.083
RSL
4.71
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
V
95-94-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
0.017
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1-Methylnaphthalene
V
90-12-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0055-0.0055
0.0055
MDL
1.1
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
58-90-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
24
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
95-95-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
120
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
88-06-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.7-1.7
1.7
MDL
1.2
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2,4-Dichlorophenol
120-83-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
4.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4-Dimethylphenol
105-67-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
36
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4-Dinitrophenol
51-28-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.98-0.98
0.98
MDL
3.9
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
121-14-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.2-2.2
2.2
MDL
0.24
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
606-20-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.9-1.9
1.9
MDL
0.049
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2-Chloronaphthalene
V
91-58-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
75
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Chlorophenol
V
95-57-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
9.1
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Methylnaphthalene
V
91-57-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0066-0.0066
0.0066
MDL
3.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Methylphenol
95-48-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.6-2.6
2.6
MDL
93
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Nitroaniline
88-74-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
"3-
oo
I
oo
3.4
MDL
19
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Nitrophenol
88-75-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.7-2.7
2.7
MDL
0.2
*
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
91-94-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.7-1.7
1.7
MDL
0.13
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
3-Nitroaniline
99-09-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.67-0.67
0.67
MDL
19
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
534-52-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
0.15
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
V
101-55-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
4
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Chloro-3-methyl phenol
59-50-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
140
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Chloroaniline
106-47-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
4.6-4.6
4.6
MDL
0.37
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
V
7005-72-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.4-2.4
2.4
MDL
4
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Methylphenol
106-44-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.6-2.6
2.6
MDL
37
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
-------
Table A2-9
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0275)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0275
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
4-Nitroaniline
100-01-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.85-0.85
0.85
MDL
3.8
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Nitrophenol
100-02-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.4-2.4
2.4
MDL
0.2
*
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Acenaphthene
V
83-32-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0061 -0.0061
0.0061
MDL
53
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Acenaphthylene
V
208-96-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0069-0.0069
0.0069
MDL
53
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Acetophenone
V
98-86-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.2-2.2
2.2
MDL
190
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Anthracene
V
120-12-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.011 -0.011
0.011
MDL
180
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Atrazine
1912-24-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.48-0.48
0.48
MDL
0.3
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Benzaldehyde
V
100-52-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.5-2.5
2.5
MDL
19
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(a)anthracene
V
56-55-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0094-0.0094
0.0094
MDL
0.03
RSL
62.3
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(a)pyrene
50-32-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.017-0.017
0.017
MDL
0.025
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
205-99-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0082-0.0082
0.0082
MDL
0.25
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
V
191-24-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0069-0.0069
0.0069
MDL
12
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
207-08-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0041 -0.0041
0.0041
MDL
2.5
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
111-91-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.9-2.9
2.9
MDL
5.9
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
V
111-44-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
0.014
RSL
17
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
V
108-60-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
71
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
117-81-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.82-0.82
0.82
MDL
5.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Butyl benzyl phthalate
85-68-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.4-1.4
1.4
MDL
16
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Caprolactam
105-60-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.8-1.8
1.8
MDL
990
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Carbazole
V
86-74-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
3.2-3.2
3.2
MDL
29
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Chrysene
218-01-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0054-0.0054
0.0054
MDL
25
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dibenzo(a, h)anthracene
53-70-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0059-0.0059
0.0059
MDL
0.025
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dibenzofuran
V
132-64-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.2-2.2
2.2
MDL
0.79
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Diethyl phthalate
84-66-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
1500
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dimethyl phthalate
131-11-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
1500
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Di-n-butyl phthalate
84-74-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.6-1.6
1.6
MDL
90
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Di-n-octyl phthalate
117-84-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.64-0.64
0.64
MDL
20
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Fluoranthene
206-44-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.012-0.012
0.012
MDL
80
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Fluorene
V
86-73-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0072-0.0072
0.0072
MDL
29
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Hexachlorobenzene
V
118-74-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.9-1.9
1.9
MDL
0.0098
RSL
0.133
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
Hexachlorobutadiene
V
87-68-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.7-1.7
1.7
MDL
0.14
RSL
0.414
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
V
77-47-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.6-1.6
1.6
MDL
0.041
RSL
0.0786
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
Hexachloroethane
V
67-72-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.6-2.6
2.6
MDL
0.33
RSL
2.29
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
193-39-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0069-0.0069
0.0069
MDL
0.25
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Isophorone
78-59-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.8-1.8
1.8
MDL
78
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Naphthalene
V
91-20-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0077-0.0077
0.0077
MDL
0.12
RSL
6.29
No
No
MDL< SL
Nitrobenzene
V
98-95-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.5-2.5
2.5
MDL
0.14
RSL
99.3
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
621-64-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.4-2.4
2.4
MDL
0.011
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
86-30-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
3.6-3.6
3.6
MDL
12
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Pentachlorophenol
87-86-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.024-0.024
0.024
MDL
0.041
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Phenanthrene
V
85-01-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0087-0.0087
0.0087
MDL
180
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
-------
Table A2-9
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0275)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0275
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
Phenol
108-95-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.5-2.5
2.5
MDL
580
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Pyrene
V
129-00-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.014-0.014
0.014
MDL
12
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
DIOX
Total PCDD/F TEQ (Mammal) V TEQ-M-DF N/A N/A |jg/L 0/1 0% N/A N/A - 0.00000012 * RSL 3.61 E-05 No No No values for dioxin TEQ
PCB
Total PCB TEQ (Mammal)
V
TEQ-M-PCB
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
N/A
N/A
-
0.00000012
*
RSL
3.61 E-05
No
No
No values for dioxin TEQ
Total PCB Congener
V
TPCB_CON
0.00017
J
0.00017
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
N/A
0.00017
MDC
0.044
*
RSL
1.65
No
No
MDC < SL
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA)
375-95-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0017-0.0017
0.0017
MDL
0.0059
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS)
355-46-4
0.0026
0.0026
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.0017-0.0017
0.0026
MDC
0.039
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS)
375-73-5
0.02
0.02
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.00035-0.00035
0.02
MDC
0.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
1763-23-1
0.06
0.06
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.00035-0.00035
0.06
MDC
0.004
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
335-67-1
0.0074
0.0074
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.00035-0.00035
0.0074
MDC
0.006
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Total Metals
Aluminum
7429-90-5
6.4
J
6.4
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
4-4
6.4
MDC
2000
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Antimony
7440-36-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.32-0.32
0.32
MDL
0.78
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Arsenic
7440-38-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.33-0.33
0.33
MDL
0.052
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Barium
7440-39-3
110
110
mq/l
1/1
100%
1.9-1.9
110
MDC
380
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Beryllium
7440-41-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.17-0.17
0.17
MDL
2.5
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Cadmium
7440-43-9
0.2
J
0.2
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.14-0.14
0.2
MDC
0.18
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Calcium
7440-70-2
12000
12000
mq/l
1/1
100%
120-120
12000
MDC
Nutrient
N/A
Nutrient
No
No
Classified as an essential nutrient
Chromium, Total
7440-47-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.32-0.32
0.32
MDL
2200
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Chromium, Hexavalent
18540-29-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1-1
1
MDL
0.035
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Cobalt
7440-48-4
1.8
1.8
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.19-0.19
1.8
MDC
0.6
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Copper
7440-50-8
63
63
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.4-0.4
63
MDC
80
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Iron
7439-89-6
2900
2900
mq/l
1/1
100%
54-54
2900
MDC
1400
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Lead
7439-92-1
2.5
2.5
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.21 -0.21
2.5
MDC
15
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Manganese
7439-96-5
56
J+
56
J+
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.17-0.17
56
MDC
43
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Mercury
7439-97-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.06-0.06
0.06
MDL
0.2
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Nickel
7440-02-0
1.9
1.9
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.2-0.2
1.9
MDC
39
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Selenium
7782-49-2
1.2
J
1.2
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
1.2-1.2
1.2
MDC
10
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Silver
7440-22-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.18-0.18
0.18
MDL
9.4
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Thallium
7440-28-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.23-0.23
0.23
MDL
0.02
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Vanadium
7440-62-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.2-1.2
1.2
MDL
8.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Zinc
7440-66-6
180
180
mq/l
1/1
100%
1.6-1.6
180
MDC
600
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Total Cyanide
Cyanide V 57-12-5 N/A N/A |jg/L 0/1 0% 2.6-2.6 2.6 MDL 0.15 RSL 20.1 No See DSA MDL > SL
Notes:
% = Percent
AL = Action Level
-------
Table A2-9
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0275)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0275
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
CASRN = Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number
COPC = Chemical of Potential Concern
DSA = Data Sensitivity Analysis
HAL = Health Advisory Level
J = Indicates an estimated value
J+ = The result is an estimated quantity, but the result may be biased high.
MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level
MDC = Maximum Detected Concentration
N/A = Not Applicable
ND = Non-Detect or Not Detected
"PFOA and PFOS Combined" = Combined total of the detected concentrations of PFOA and PFOS (non-detect results were not included in the summation).
RL = Reporting Limit
RSL = Regional Screening Level
|jg/L = micrograms per liter
USEPA = United States Environmental Protection Agency
(1) "V" indicates that the chemical is volatile.
(2) Groundwater data screened against USEPA Tap Water RSLs, last updated May 2022 (TR = 1E-6, THQ = 0.1).
(3) An asterisk,"*", indicates surrogate toxicity information was used to derive a Screening Level (see Table A2-14).
(4) Groundwater data screened against USEPA Residential Groundwater VI SLs, last updated May 2022 (TR= 1E-6, THQ = 0.1). Site-specific, system temperature was set to 20.5 Celsius (average of recorded temperatures taken infield).
(6) Lead is compared to the EPA tap water RSL of 15 |jg/L, which represents the 90th percentile concentration of lead found in tap water samples collected nationwide (Lead and Copper Rule, 56 Federal Register 26460-26564, dated June 7,1991) and
is not a risk-based number, but rather an action level.
-------
Table A2-10
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0500)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0500
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
V
71-55-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.075-0.075
0.075
MDL
800
RSL
893
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
V
79-34-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.05-0.05
0.05
MDL
0.076
RSL
4.18
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
V
79-00-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.042-0.042
0.042
MDL
0.041
RSL
0.779
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane (Freon 113)
V
76-13-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.099-0.099
0.099
MDL
1000
RSL
28.5
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1-Dichloroethane
V
75-34-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.058-0.058
0.058
MDL
2.8
RSL
9.09
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1-Dichloroethene
V
75-35-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.064-0.064
0.064
MDL
28
RSL
22.7
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
V
87-61-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.076-0.076
0.076
MDL
0.7
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
V
96-18-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.077-0.077
0.077
MDL
0.00075
RSL
2.89
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
V
120-82-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.068-0.068
0.068
MDL
0.4
RSL
4.97
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
V
95-63-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.051 -0.051
0.051
MDL
5.6
RSL
33
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
V
96-12-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.14-0.14
0.14
MDL
0.00033
RSL
0.0381
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2-Dibromoethane
V
106-93-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.052-0.052
0.052
MDL
0.0075
RSL
0.221
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
V
95-50-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.045-0.045
0.045
MDL
30
RSL
351
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2-Dichloroethane
V
107-06-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.079-0.079
0.079
MDL
0.17
RSL
2.74
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2-Dichloropropane
V
78-87-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.069-0.069
0.069
MDL
0.82
RSL
4.44
No
No
MDL< SL
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
V
108-67-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.067-0.067
0.067
MDL
6
RSL
23.2
No
No
MDL< SL
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
V
541-73-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.071 -0.071
0.071
MDL
30
*
RSL
351
No
No
MDL< SL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
V
106-46-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.047-0.047
0.047
MDL
0.48
RSL
3.42
No
No
MDL< SL
1,4-Dioxane
V
123-91-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.9-0.9
0.9
MDL
0.46
RSL
3570
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2-Butanone (MEK)
V
78-93-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
lo
I
lo
1.5
MDL
560
RSL
274000
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Hexanone
V
591-78-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.68-0.68
0.68
MDL
3.8
RSL
1060
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
V
108-10-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
O
I
o
0.71
MDL
630
RSL
70200
No
No
MDL< SL
Acetone
V
67-64-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
1800
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzene
V
71-43-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.085-0.085
0.085
MDL
0.46
RSL
1.92
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromochloromethane
V
74-97-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.064-0.064
0.064
MDL
8.3
RSL
83.9
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromodichloromethane
V
75-27-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.062-0.062
0.062
MDL
0.13
RSL
1.08
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromoform
V
75-25-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.095-0.095
0.095
MDL
3.3
RSL
152
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromomethane
V
74-83-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.058-0.058
0.058
MDL
0.75
RSL
1.98
No
No
MDL< SL
Carbon disulfide
V
75-15-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.092-0.092
0.092
MDL
81
RSL
145
No
No
MDL< SL
Carbon tetrachloride
V
56-23-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.086-0.086
0.086
MDL
0.46
RSL
0.499
No
No
MDL< SL
Chlorobenzene
V
108-90-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.064-0.064
0.064
MDL
7.8
RSL
51.9
No
No
MDL< SL
Chloroethane
V
75-00-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.074-0.074
0.074
MDL
830
RSL
1050
No
No
MDL< SL
Chloroform
V
67-66-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.079-0.079
0.079
MDL
0.22
RSL
0.972
No
No
MDL< SL
Chloromethane
V
74-87-3
0.11
J
0.11
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.082-0.082
0.11
MDC
19
RSL
28.9
No
No
MDC < SL
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
V
156-59-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.075-0.075
0.075
MDL
3.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
V
10061-01-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.069-0.069
0.069
MDL
0.47
*
RSL
6.04
No
No
MDL< SL
Cyclohexane
V
110-82-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.065-0.065
0.065
MDL
1300
RSL
123
No
No
MDL< SL
Dibromochloromethane
V
124-48-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.073-0.073
0.073
MDL
0.87
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dichlorodifluoromethane
V
75-71-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.12-0.12
0.12
MDL
20
RSL
0.815
No
No
MDL< SL
Ethylbenzene
V
100-41-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.079-0.079
0.079
MDL
1.5
RSL
4.45
No
No
MDL< SL
-------
Table A2-10
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0500)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0500
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
Isopropylbenzene
V
98-82-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.076-0.076
0.076
MDL
45
RSL
121
No
No
MDL< SL
m,p-Xylene
V
179601-23-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.083-0.083
0.083
MDL
19
*
RSL
45.5
No
No
MDL< SL
Methyl Acetate
V
79-20-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.11 -0.11
0.11
MDL
2000
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Methyl Tert Butyl Ether
V
1634-04-4
0.36
J
0.36
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.053-0.053
0.36
MDC
14
RSL
533
No
No
MDC < SL
Methylcyclohexane
V
108-87-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.08-0.08
0.08
MDL
1300
*
RSL
123
No
No
MDL< SL
Methylene chloride
V
75-09-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.053-0.053
0.053
MDL
11
RSL
555
No
No
MDL< SL
o-Xylene
V
95-47-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.075-0.075
0.075
MDL
19
RSL
63.3
No
No
MDL< SL
Styrene
V
100-42-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.082-0.082
0.082
MDL
120
RSL
1210
No
No
MDL< SL
Tetrachloroethene
V
127-18-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.083-0.083
0.083
MDL
4.1
RSL
7.25
No
No
MDL< SL
Toluene
V
108-88-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.077-0.077
0.077
MDL
110
RSL
2390
No
No
MDL< SL
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
V
156-60-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.081 -0.081
0.081
MDL
6.8
RSL
12.9
No
No
MDL< SL
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
V
10061-02-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.07-0.07
0.07
MDL
0.47
*
RSL
6.04
No
No
MDL< SL
Trichloroethene
V
79-01-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.062-0.062
0.062
MDL
0.28
RSL
0.632
No
No
MDL< SL
Trichlorofluoromethane
V
75-69-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.11 -0.11
0.11
MDL
520
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Vinyl chloride
V
75-01-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.07-0.07
0.07
MDL
0.019
RSL
0.164
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs)
1,1 '-Biphenyl
V
92-52-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.9-1.9
1.9
MDL
0.083
RSL
4.71
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
V
95-94-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
0.017
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1-Methylnaphthalene
V
90-12-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0055-0.0055
0.0055
MDL
1.1
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
58-90-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
24
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
95-95-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
120
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
88-06-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.7-1.7
1.7
MDL
1.2
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2,4-Dichlorophenol
120-83-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
4.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4-Dimethylphenol
105-67-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
36
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4-Dinitrophenol
51-28-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.98-0.98
0.98
MDL
3.9
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
121-14-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.2-2.2
2.2
MDL
0.24
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
606-20-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.9-1.9
1.9
MDL
0.049
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2-Chloronaphthalene
V
91-58-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
75
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Chlorophenol
V
95-57-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
9.1
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Methylnaphthalene
V
91-57-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0066-0.0066
0.0066
MDL
3.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Methylphenol
95-48-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.6-2.6
2.6
MDL
93
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Nitroaniline
88-74-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
"3-
oo
I
oo
3.4
MDL
19
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Nitrophenol
88-75-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.7-2.7
2.7
MDL
0.2
*
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
91-94-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.7-1.7
1.7
MDL
0.13
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
3-Nitroaniline
99-09-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.67-0.67
0.67
MDL
19
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
534-52-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
0.15
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
V
101-55-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
4
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Chloro-3-methyl phenol
59-50-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
140
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Chloroaniline
106-47-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
4.6-4.6
4.6
MDL
0.37
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
V
7005-72-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.4-2.4
2.4
MDL
4
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Methylphenol
106-44-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.6-2.6
2.6
MDL
37
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
-------
Table A2-10
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0500)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0500
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
4-Nitroaniline
100-01-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.85-0.85
0.85
MDL
3.8
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Nitrophenol
100-02-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.4-2.4
2.4
MDL
0.2
*
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Acenaphthene
V
83-32-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0061 -0.0061
0.0061
MDL
53
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Acenaphthylene
V
208-96-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0069-0.0069
0.0069
MDL
53
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Acetophenone
V
98-86-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.2-2.2
2.2
MDL
190
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Anthracene
V
120-12-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.011 -0.011
0.011
MDL
180
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Atrazine
1912-24-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.48-0.48
0.48
MDL
0.3
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Benzaldehyde
V
100-52-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.5-2.5
2.5
MDL
19
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(a)anthracene
V
56-55-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0094-0.0094
0.0094
MDL
0.03
RSL
62.3
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(a)pyrene
50-32-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.017-0.017
0.017
MDL
0.025
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
205-99-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0082-0.0082
0.0082
MDL
0.25
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
V
191-24-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0069-0.0069
0.0069
MDL
12
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
207-08-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0041 -0.0041
0.0041
MDL
2.5
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
111-91-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.9-2.9
2.9
MDL
5.9
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
V
111-44-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
0.014
RSL
17
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
V
108-60-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
71
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
117-81-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.82-0.82
0.82
MDL
5.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Butyl benzyl phthalate
85-68-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.4-1.4
1.4
MDL
16
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Caprolactam
105-60-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.8-1.8
1.8
MDL
990
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Carbazole
V
86-74-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
3.2-3.2
3.2
MDL
29
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Chrysene
218-01-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0054-0.0054
0.0054
MDL
25
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dibenzo(a, h)anthracene
53-70-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0059-0.0059
0.0059
MDL
0.025
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dibenzofuran
V
132-64-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.2-2.2
2.2
MDL
0.79
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Diethyl phthalate
84-66-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
1500
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dimethyl phthalate
131-11-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
1500
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Di-n-butyl phthalate
84-74-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.6-1.6
1.6
MDL
90
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Di-n-octyl phthalate
117-84-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.64-0.64
0.64
MDL
20
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Fluoranthene
206-44-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.012-0.012
0.012
MDL
80
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Fluorene
V
86-73-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0072-0.0072
0.0072
MDL
29
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Hexachlorobenzene
V
118-74-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.9-1.9
1.9
MDL
0.0098
RSL
0.133
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
Hexachlorobutadiene
V
87-68-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.7-1.7
1.7
MDL
0.14
RSL
0.414
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
V
77-47-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.6-1.6
1.6
MDL
0.041
RSL
0.0786
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
Hexachloroethane
V
67-72-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.6-2.6
2.6
MDL
0.33
RSL
2.29
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
193-39-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0069-0.0069
0.0069
MDL
0.25
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Isophorone
78-59-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.8-1.8
1.8
MDL
78
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Naphthalene
V
91-20-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0077-0.0077
0.0077
MDL
0.12
RSL
6.29
No
No
MDL< SL
Nitrobenzene
V
98-95-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.5-2.5
2.5
MDL
0.14
RSL
99.3
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
621-64-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.4-2.4
2.4
MDL
0.011
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
86-30-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
3.6-3.6
3.6
MDL
12
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Pentachlorophenol
87-86-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.024-0.024
0.024
MDL
0.041
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Phenanthrene
V
85-01-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0087-0.0087
0.0087
MDL
180
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
-------
Table A2-10
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0500)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0500
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
Phenol
108-95-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.5-2.5
2.5
MDL
580
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Pyrene
V
129-00-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.014-0.014
0.014
MDL
12
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
DIOX
Total PCDD/F TEQ (Mammal) V TEQ-M-DF N/A N/A |jg/L 0/1 0% N/A N/A - 0.00000012 * RSL 3.61 E-05 No No No values for dioxin TEQ
PCB
Total PCB TEQ (Mammal)
V
TEQ-M-PCB
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
N/A
N/A
-
0.00000012
*
RSL
3.61 E-05
No
No
No values for dioxin TEQ
Total PCB Congener
V
TPCB_CON
0.000082
J
0.000082
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
N/A
0.000082
MDC
0.044
*
RSL
1.65
No
No
MDC < SL
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA)
375-95-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0018-0.0018
0.0018
MDL
0.0059
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS)
355-46-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0018-0.0018
0.0018
MDL
0.039
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS)
375-73-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.00035-0.00035
0.00035
MDL
0.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
1763-23-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.00035-0.00035
0.00035
MDL
0.004
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
335-67-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.00035-0.00035
0.00035
MDL
0.006
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Total Metals
Aluminum
7429-90-5
110
110
mq/l
1/1
100%
4-4
110
MDC
2000
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Antimony
7440-36-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.32-0.32
0.32
MDL
0.78
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Arsenic
7440-38-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.33-0.33
0.33
MDL
0.052
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Barium
7440-39-3
690
690
mq/l
1/1
100%
1.9-1.9
690
MDC
380
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Beryllium
7440-41-7
3.6
3.6
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.17-0.17
3.6
MDC
2.5
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Cadmium
7440-43-9
0.44
J
0.44
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.14-0.14
0.44
MDC
0.18
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Calcium
7440-70-2
8600
8600
mq/l
1/1
100%
120-120
8600
MDC
Nutrient
N/A
Nutrient
No
No
Classified as an essential nutrient
Chromium, Total
7440-47-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.32-0.32
0.32
MDL
2200
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Chromium, Hexavalent
18540-29-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1-1
1
MDL
0.035
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Cobalt
7440-48-4
26
26
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.19-0.19
26
MDC
0.6
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Copper
7440-50-8
53
53
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.4-0.4
53
MDC
80
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Iron
7439-89-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
54-54
54
MDL
1400
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Lead
7439-92-1
2.6
2.6
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.21 -0.21
2.6
MDC
15
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Manganese
7439-96-5
180
J+
180
J+
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.17-0.17
180
MDC
43
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Mercury
7439-97-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.06-0.06
0.06
MDL
0.2
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Nickel
7440-02-0
13
13
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.2-0.2
13
MDC
39
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Selenium
7782-49-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.2-1.2
1.2
MDL
10
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Silver
7440-22-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.18-0.18
0.18
MDL
9.4
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Thallium
7440-28-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.23-0.23
0.23
MDL
0.02
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Vanadium
7440-62-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.2-1.2
1.2
MDL
8.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Zinc
7440-66-6
220
220
mq/l
1/1
100%
1.6-1.6
220
MDC
600
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Total Cyanide
Cyanide V 57-12-5 N/A N/A |jg/L 0/1 0% 2.6-2.6 2.6 MDL 0.15 RSL 20.1 No See DSA MDL > SL
Notes:
% = Percent
AL = Action Level
-------
Table A2-10
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0500)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0500
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
CASRN = Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number
COPC = Chemical of Potential Concern
DSA = Data Sensitivity Analysis
HAL = Health Advisory Level
J = Indicates an estimated value
J+ = The result is an estimated quantity, but the result may be biased high.
MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level
MDC = Maximum Detected Concentration
N/A = Not Applicable
ND = Non-Detect or Not Detected
"PFOA and PFOS Combined" = Combined total of the detected concentrations of PFOA and PFOS (non-detect results were not included in the summation).
RL = Reporting Limit
RSL = Regional Screening Level
|jg/L = micrograms per liter
USEPA = United States Environmental Protection Agency
(1) "V" indicates that the chemical is volatile.
(2) Groundwater data screened against USEPA Tap Water RSLs, last updated May 2022 (TR = 1E-6, THQ = 0.1).
(3) An asterisk,"*", indicates surrogate toxicity information was used to derive a Screening Level (see Table A2-14).
(4) Groundwater data screened against USEPA Residential Groundwater VI SLs, last updated May 2022 (TR= 1E-6, THQ = 0.1). Site-specific, system temperature was set to 20.5 Celsius (average of recorded temperatures taken infield).
(6) Lead is compared to the EPA tap water RSL of 15 |jg/L, which represents the 90th percentile concentration of lead found in tap water samples collected nationwide (Lead and Copper Rule, 56 Federal Register 26460-26564, dated June 7,1991) and
is not a risk-based number, but rather an action level.
-------
Table A2-11
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0501)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0501
Chemical(1)
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6>
Source
visl(4)
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
V
71-55-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.075-0.075
0.075
MDL
800
RSL
893
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
V
79-34-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.05-0.05
0.05
MDL
0.076
RSL
4.18
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1,2-T richloroethane
V
79-00-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.042-0.042
0.042
MDL
0.041
RSL
0.779
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,1,2-T richlorotrifluoroethane (Freon 113)
V
76-13-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.099-0.099
0.099
MDL
1000
RSL
28.5
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1-Dichloroethane
V
75-34-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.058-0.058
0.058
MDL
2.8
RSL
9.09
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1-Dichloroethene
V
75-35-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.064-0.064
0.064
MDL
28
RSL
22.7
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
V
87-61-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.076-0.076
0.076
MDL
0.7
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
V
96-18-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.077-0.077
0.077
MDL
0.00075
RSL
2.89
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
V
120-82-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.068-0.068
0.068
MDL
0.4
RSL
4.97
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
V
95-63-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.051 -0.051
0.051
MDL
5.6
RSL
33
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
V
96-12-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.14-0.14
0.14
MDL
0.00033
RSL
0.0381
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2-Dibromoethane
V
106-93-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.052-0.052
0.052
MDL
0.0075
RSL
0.221
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
V
95-50-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.045-0.045
0.045
MDL
30
RSL
351
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2-Dichloroethane
V
107-06-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.079-0.079
0.079
MDL
0.17
RSL
2.74
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2-Dichloropropane
V
78-87-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.069-0.069
0.069
MDL
0.82
RSL
4.44
No
No
MDL< SL
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
V
108-67-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.067-0.067
0.067
MDL
6
RSL
23.2
No
No
MDL< SL
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
V
541-73-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.071 -0.071
0.071
MDL
30
*
RSL
351
No
No
MDL< SL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
V
106-46-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.047-0.047
0.047
MDL
0.48
RSL
3.42
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Butanone (MEK)
V
78-93-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
lo
I
lo
1.5
MDL
560
RSL
274000
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Hexanone
V
591-78-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.68-0.68
0.68
MDL
3.8
RSL
1060
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
V
108-10-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
O
I
o
0.71
MDL
630
RSL
70200
No
No
MDL< SL
Acetone
V
67-64-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
1800
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzene
V
71-43-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.085-0.085
0.085
MDL
0.46
RSL
1.92
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromochloromethane
V
74-97-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.064-0.064
0.064
MDL
8.3
RSL
83.9
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromodichloromethane
V
75-27-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.062-0.062
0.062
MDL
0.13
RSL
1.08
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromoform
V
75-25-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.095-0.095
0.095
MDL
3.3
RSL
152
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromomethane
V
74-83-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.058-0.058
0.058
MDL
0.75
RSL
1.98
No
No
MDL< SL
Carbon disulfide
V
75-15-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.092-0.092
0.092
MDL
81
RSL
145
No
No
MDL< SL
Carbon tetrachloride
V
56-23-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.086-0.086
0.086
MDL
0.46
RSL
0.499
No
No
MDL< SL
Chlorobenzene
V
108-90-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.064-0.064
0.064
MDL
7.8
RSL
51.9
No
No
MDL< SL
Chloroethane
V
75-00-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.074-0.074
0.074
MDL
830
RSL
1050
No
No
MDL< SL
Chloroform
V
67-66-3
0.96
0.96
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.079-0.079
0.96
MDC
0.22
RSL
0.972
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Chloromethane
V
74-87-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.082-0.082
0.082
MDL
19
RSL
28.9
No
No
MDL< SL
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
V
156-59-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.075-0.075
0.075
MDL
3.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
V
10061-01-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.069-0.069
0.069
MDL
0.47
*
RSL
6.04
No
No
MDL< SL
Cyclohexane
V
110-82-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.065-0.065
0.065
MDL
1300
RSL
123
No
No
MDL< SL
Dibromochloromethane
V
124-48-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.073-0.073
0.073
MDL
0.87
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dichlorodifluoromethane
V
75-71-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.12-0.12
0.12
MDL
20
RSL
0.815
No
No
MDL< SL
Ethylbenzene
V
100-41-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.079-0.079
0.079
MDL
1.5
RSL
4.45
No
No
MDL< SL
Isopropylbenzene
V
98-82-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.076-0.076
0.076
MDL
45
RSL
121
No
No
MDL< SL
-------
Table A2-11
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0501)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0501
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
m,p-Xylene
V
179601-23-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.083-0.083
0.083
MDL
19
*
RSL
45.5
No
No
MDL< SL
Methyl Acetate
V
79-20-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
O
I
o
0.11
MDL
2000
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Methyl Tert Butyl Ether
V
1634-04-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.053-0.053
0.053
MDL
14
RSL
533
No
No
MDL< SL
Methylcyclohexane
V
108-87-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.08-0.08
0.08
MDL
1300
*
RSL
123
No
No
MDL< SL
Methylene chloride
V
75-09-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.053-0.053
0.053
MDL
11
RSL
555
No
No
MDL< SL
o-Xylene
V
95-47-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.075-0.075
0.075
MDL
19
RSL
63.3
No
No
MDL< SL
Styrene
V
100-42-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.082-0.082
0.082
MDL
120
RSL
1210
No
No
MDL< SL
Tetrachloroethene
V
127-18-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.083-0.083
0.083
MDL
4.1
RSL
7.25
No
No
MDL< SL
Toluene
V
108-88-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.077-0.077
0.077
MDL
110
RSL
2390
No
No
MDL< SL
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
V
156-60-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.081 -0.081
0.081
MDL
6.8
RSL
12.9
No
No
MDL< SL
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
V
10061-02-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.07-0.07
0.07
MDL
0.47
*
RSL
6.04
No
No
MDL< SL
Trichloroethene
V
79-01-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.062-0.062
0.062
MDL
0.28
RSL
0.632
No
No
MDL< SL
Trichlorofluoromethane
V
75-69-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
O
I
o
0.11
MDL
520
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Vinyl chloride
V
75-01-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.07-0.07
0.07
MDL
0.019
RSL
0.164
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs)
1-Methylnaphthalene
V
90-12-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0055-0.0055
0.0055
MDL
1.1
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Methylnaphthalene
V
91-57-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0066-0.0066
0.0066
MDL
3.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Acenaphthene
V
83-32-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0061 -0.0061
0.0061
MDL
53
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Acenaphthylene
V
208-96-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0069-0.0069
0.0069
MDL
53
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Anthracene
V
120-12-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.011 -0.011
0.011
MDL
180
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(a)anthracene
V
56-55-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0094-0.0094
0.0094
MDL
0.03
RSL
62.3
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(a)pyrene
50-32-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.017-0.017
0.017
MDL
0.025
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
205-99-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0082-0.0082
0.0082
MDL
0.25
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
V
191-24-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0069-0.0069
0.0069
MDL
12
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
207-08-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0041 -0.0041
0.0041
MDL
2.5
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Chrysene
218-01-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0054-0.0054
0.0054
MDL
25
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dibenzo(a, h)anthracene
53-70-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0059-0.0059
0.0059
MDL
0.025
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Fluoranthene
206-44-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.012-0.012
0.012
MDL
80
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Fluorene
V
86-73-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0072-0.0072
0.0072
MDL
29
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
193-39-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0069-0.0069
0.0069
MDL
0.25
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Naphthalene
V
91-20-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0077-0.0077
0.0077
MDL
0.12
RSL
6.29
No
No
MDL< SL
Pentachlorophenol
87-86-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.024-0.024
0.024
MDL
0.041
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Phenanthrene
V
85-01-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0087-0.0087
0.0087
MDL
180
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Pyrene
V
129-00-0
0.025
JB
0.025
JB
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.014-0.014
0.025
MDC
12
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
DIOX
Total PCDD/F TEQ (Mammal) V TEQ-M-DF N/A N/A |jg/L 0/1 0% N/A N/A - 0.00000012 * RSL 3.61 E-05 No No No values for dioxin TEQ
PCB
Total PCB TEQ (Mammal)
V
TEQ-M-PCB
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
N/A
N/A
-
0.00000012
*
RSL
3.61 E-05
No
No
No values for dioxin TEQ
Total PCB Congener
V
TPCB_CON
0.00004
J
0.00004
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
N/A
0.00004
MDC
0.044
*
RSL
1.65
No
No
MDC < SL
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA) 375-95-1 0.0036 0.0036 |jg/L 1/1 100% 0.0018-0.0018 0.0036 MDC 0.0059 RSL No SL No No MDC
-------
Table A2-11
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0501)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0501
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS)
355-46-4
0.012
0.012
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.0018-0.0018
0.012
MDC
0.039
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS)
375-73-5
0.11
0.11
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.0018-0.0018
0.11
MDC
0.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
1763-23-1
0.13
0.13
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.0018-0.0018
0.13
MDC
0.004
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
335-67-1
0.017
0.017
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.00035-0.00035
0.017
MDC
0.006
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Total Metals
Aluminum
7429-90-5
4
J
4
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
4-4
4
MDC
2000
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Antimony
7440-36-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.32-0.32
0.32
MDL
0.78
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Arsenic
7440-38-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.33-0.33
0.33
MDL
0.052
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Barium
7440-39-3
200
200
mq/l
1/1
100%
1.9-1.9
200
MDC
380
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Beryllium
7440-41-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.17-0.17
0.17
MDL
2.5
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Cadmium
7440-43-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.14-0.14
0.14
MDL
0.18
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Calcium
7440-70-2
15000
15000
mq/l
1/1
100%
120-120
15000
MDC
Nutrient
N/A
Nutrient
No
No
Classified as an essential nutrient
Chromium, Total
7440-47-3
1.7
J
1.7
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.32-0.32
1.7
MDC
2200
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Chromium, Hexavalent
18540-29-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1-1
1
MDL
0.035
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Cobalt
7440-48-4
16
16
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.19-0.19
16
MDC
0.6
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Copper
7440-50-8
3.3
3.3
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.4-0.4
3.3
MDC
80
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Iron
7439-89-6
190
J
190
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
54-54
190
MDC
1400
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Lead
7439-92-1
0.22
J
0.22
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.21 -0.21
0.22
MDC
15
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Manganese
7439-96-5
260
260
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.17-0.17
260
MDC
43
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Mercury
7439-97-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.06-0.06
0.06
MDL
0.2
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Nickel
7440-02-0
2.3
JB+
2.3
JB+
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.2-0.2
2.3
MDC
39
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Selenium
7782-49-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.2-1.2
1.2
MDL
10
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Silver
7440-22-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.18-0.18
0.18
MDL
9.4
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Thallium
7440-28-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.23-0.23
0.23
MDL
0.02
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Vanadium
7440-62-2
3.2
J
3.2
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
1.2-1.2
3.2
MDC
8.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Zinc
7440-66-6
34
34
mq/l
1/1
100%
1.6-1.6
34
MDC
600
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Total Cyanide
Cyanide
V
57-12-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.6-2.6
2.6
MDL
0.15
RSL
20.1
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Notes:
% = Percent
AL = Action Level
CASRN = Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number
COPC = Chemical of Potential Concern
DSA = Data Sensitivity Analysis
HAL = Health Advisory Level
J = Indicates an estimated value
MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level
MDC = Maximum Detected Concentration
N/A = Not Applicable
ND = Non-Detect or Not Detected
-------
Table A2-11
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0501)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0501
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
"PFOA and PFOS Combined" = Combined total of the detected concentrations of PFOA and PFOS (non-detect results were not included in the summation).
RL = Reporting Limit
RSL = Regional Screening Level
|jg/L = micrograms per liter
USEPA = United States Environmental Protection Agency
(1) "V" indicates that the chemical is volatile.
(2) Groundwater data screened against USEPA Tap Water RSLs, last updated May 2022 (TR = 1E-6, THQ = 0.1).
(3) An asterisk,"*", indicates surrogate toxicity information was used to derive a Screening Level (see Table A2-14).
(4) Groundwater data screened against USEPA Residential Groundwater VI SLs, last updated May 2022 (TR= 1E-6, THQ = 0.1). Site-specific, system temperature was set to 20.5 Celsius (average of recorded temperatures taken infield).
(6) Lead is compared to the EPA tap water RSL of 15 |jg/L, which represents the 90th percentile concentration of lead found in tap water samples collected nationwide (Lead and Copper Rule, 56 Federal Register 26460-26564, dated June 7,1991) and
is not a risk-based number, but rather an action level.
-------
Table A2-12
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0510)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0510
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
V
71-55-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.075-0.075
0.075
MDL
800
RSL
893
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
V
79-34-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.05-0.05
0.05
MDL
0.076
RSL
4.18
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
V
79-00-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.042-0.042
0.042
MDL
0.041
RSL
0.779
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane (Freon 113)
V
76-13-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.099-0.099
0.099
MDL
1000
RSL
28.5
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1-Dichloroethane
V
75-34-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.058-0.058
0.058
MDL
2.8
RSL
9.09
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1-Dichloroethene
V
75-35-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.064-0.064
0.064
MDL
28
RSL
22.7
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
V
87-61-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.076-0.076
0.076
MDL
0.7
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
V
96-18-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.077-0.077
0.077
MDL
0.00075
RSL
2.89
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
V
120-82-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.068-0.068
0.068
MDL
0.4
RSL
4.97
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
V
95-63-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.051 -0.051
0.051
MDL
5.6
RSL
33
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
V
96-12-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.14-0.14
0.14
MDL
0.00033
RSL
0.0381
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2-Dibromoethane
V
106-93-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.052-0.052
0.052
MDL
0.0075
RSL
0.221
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
V
95-50-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.045-0.045
0.045
MDL
30
RSL
351
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2-Dichloroethane
V
107-06-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.079-0.079
0.079
MDL
0.17
RSL
2.74
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2-Dichloropropane
V
78-87-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.069-0.069
0.069
MDL
0.82
RSL
4.44
No
No
MDL< SL
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
V
108-67-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.067-0.067
0.067
MDL
6
RSL
23.2
No
No
MDL< SL
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
V
541-73-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.071 -0.071
0.071
MDL
30
*
RSL
351
No
No
MDL< SL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
V
106-46-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.047-0.047
0.047
MDL
0.48
RSL
3.42
No
No
MDL< SL
1,4-Dioxane
V
123-91-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.86-0.86
0.86
MDL
0.46
RSL
3570
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2-Butanone (MEK)
V
78-93-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
lo
I
lo
1.5
MDL
560
RSL
274000
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Hexanone
V
591-78-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.68-0.68
0.68
MDL
3.8
RSL
1060
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
V
108-10-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
O
I
o
0.71
MDL
630
RSL
70200
No
No
MDL< SL
Acetone
V
67-64-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
1800
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzene
V
71-43-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.085-0.085
0.085
MDL
0.46
RSL
1.92
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromochloromethane
V
74-97-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.064-0.064
0.064
MDL
8.3
RSL
83.9
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromodichloromethane
V
75-27-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.062-0.062
0.062
MDL
0.13
RSL
1.08
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromoform
V
75-25-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.095-0.095
0.095
MDL
3.3
RSL
152
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromomethane
V
74-83-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.058-0.058
0.058
MDL
0.75
RSL
1.98
No
No
MDL< SL
Carbon disulfide
V
75-15-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.092-0.092
0.092
MDL
81
RSL
145
No
No
MDL< SL
Carbon tetrachloride
V
56-23-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.086-0.086
0.086
MDL
0.46
RSL
0.499
No
No
MDL< SL
Chlorobenzene
V
108-90-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.064-0.064
0.064
MDL
7.8
RSL
51.9
No
No
MDL< SL
Chloroethane
V
75-00-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.074-0.074
0.074
MDL
830
RSL
1050
No
No
MDL< SL
Chloroform
V
67-66-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.079-0.079
0.079
MDL
0.22
RSL
0.972
No
No
MDL< SL
Chloromethane
V
74-87-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.082-0.082
0.082
MDL
19
RSL
28.9
No
No
MDL< SL
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
V
156-59-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.075-0.075
0.075
MDL
3.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
V
10061-01-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.069-0.069
0.069
MDL
0.47
*
RSL
6.04
No
No
MDL< SL
Cyclohexane
V
110-82-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.065-0.065
0.065
MDL
1300
RSL
123
No
No
MDL< SL
Dibromochloromethane
V
124-48-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.073-0.073
0.073
MDL
0.87
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dichlorodifluoromethane
V
75-71-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.12-0.12
0.12
MDL
20
RSL
0.815
No
No
MDL< SL
Ethylbenzene
V
100-41-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.079-0.079
0.079
MDL
1.5
RSL
4.45
No
No
MDL< SL
-------
Table A2-12
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0510)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0510
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
Isopropylbenzene
V
98-82-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.076-0.076
0.076
MDL
45
RSL
121
No
No
MDL< SL
m,p-Xylene
V
179601-23-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.083-0.083
0.083
MDL
19
*
RSL
45.5
No
No
MDL< SL
Methyl Acetate
V
79-20-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.11 -0.11
0.11
MDL
2000
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Methyl Tert Butyl Ether
V
1634-04-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.053-0.053
0.053
MDL
14
RSL
533
No
No
MDL< SL
Methylcyclohexane
V
108-87-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.08-0.08
0.08
MDL
1300
*
RSL
123
No
No
MDL< SL
Methylene chloride
V
75-09-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.053-0.053
0.053
MDL
11
RSL
555
No
No
MDL< SL
o-Xylene
V
95-47-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.075-0.075
0.075
MDL
19
RSL
63.3
No
No
MDL< SL
Styrene
V
100-42-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.082-0.082
0.082
MDL
120
RSL
1210
No
No
MDL< SL
Tetrachloroethene
V
127-18-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.083-0.083
0.083
MDL
4.1
RSL
7.25
No
No
MDL< SL
Toluene
V
108-88-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.077-0.077
0.077
MDL
110
RSL
2390
No
No
MDL< SL
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
V
156-60-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.081 -0.081
0.081
MDL
6.8
RSL
12.9
No
No
MDL< SL
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
V
10061-02-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.07-0.07
0.07
MDL
0.47
*
RSL
6.04
No
No
MDL< SL
Trichloroethene
V
79-01-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.062-0.062
0.062
MDL
0.28
RSL
0.632
No
No
MDL< SL
Trichlorofluoromethane
V
75-69-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.11 -0.11
0.11
MDL
520
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Vinyl chloride
V
75-01-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.07-0.07
0.07
MDL
0.019
RSL
0.164
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs)
1,1 '-Biphenyl
V
92-52-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.8-1.8
1.8
MDL
0.083
RSL
4.71
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
V
95-94-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
0.017
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1-Methylnaphthalene
V
90-12-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0052-0.0052
0.0052
MDL
1.1
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
58-90-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.2-2.2
2.2
MDL
24
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
95-95-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
120
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
88-06-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.6-1.6
1.6
MDL
1.2
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2,4-Dichlorophenol
120-83-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.2-2.2
2.2
MDL
4.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4-Dimethylphenol
105-67-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.9-1.9
1.9
MDL
36
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4-Dinitrophenol
51-28-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.93-0.93
0.93
MDL
3.9
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
121-14-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
0.24
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
606-20-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.8-1.8
1.8
MDL
0.049
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2-Chloronaphthalene
V
91-58-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.9-1.9
1.9
MDL
75
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Chlorophenol
V
95-57-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
9.1
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Methylnaphthalene
V
91-57-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0063-0.0063
0.0063
MDL
3.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Methylphenol
95-48-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.5-2.5
2.5
MDL
93
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Nitroaniline
88-74-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
CM
CO
I
CM
CO
3.2
MDL
19
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Nitrophenol
88-75-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.6-2.6
2.6
MDL
0.2
*
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
91-94-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.6-1.6
1.6
MDL
0.13
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
3-Nitroaniline
99-09-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.64-0.64
0.64
MDL
19
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
534-52-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
0.15
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
V
101-55-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.2-2.2
2.2
MDL
4
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Chloro-3-methyl phenol
59-50-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
140
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Chloroaniline
106-47-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
4.4-4.4
4.4
MDL
0.37
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
V
7005-72-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
4
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Methylphenol
106-44-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.5-2.5
2.5
MDL
37
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
-------
Table A2-12
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0510)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0510
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
4-Nitroaniline
100-01-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
O
CO
I
o
CO
0.81
MDL
3.8
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Nitrophenol
100-02-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
0.2
*
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Acenaphthene
V
83-32-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0058-0.0058
0.0058
MDL
53
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Acenaphthylene
V
208-96-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0066-0.0066
0.0066
MDL
53
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Acetophenone
V
98-86-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
190
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Anthracene
V
120-12-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.01 -0.01
0.01
MDL
180
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Atrazine
1912-24-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.46-0.46
0.46
MDL
0.3
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Benzaldehyde
V
100-52-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.4-2.4
2.4
MDL
19
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(a)anthracene
V
56-55-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.009-0.009
0.009
MDL
0.03
RSL
62.3
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(a)pyrene
50-32-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.016-0.016
0.016
MDL
0.025
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
205-99-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0078-0.0078
0.0078
MDL
0.25
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
V
191-24-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0066-0.0066
0.0066
MDL
12
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
207-08-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0039-0.0039
0.0039
MDL
2.5
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
111-91-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.8-2.8
2.8
MDL
5.9
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
V
111-44-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
0.014
RSL
17
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
V
108-60-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.2-2.2
2.2
MDL
71
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
117-81-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.78-0.78
0.78
MDL
5.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Butyl benzyl phthalate
85-68-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.3-1.3
1.3
MDL
16
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Caprolactam
105-60-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.7-1.7
1.7
MDL
990
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Carbazole
V
86-74-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
3-3
3
MDL
29
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Chrysene
218-01-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0051 -0.0051
0.0051
MDL
25
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dibenzo(a, h)anthracene
53-70-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0056-0.0056
0.0056
MDL
0.025
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dibenzofuran
V
132-64-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
0.79
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Diethyl phthalate
84-66-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.9-1.9
1.9
MDL
1500
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dimethyl phthalate
131-11-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.9-1.9
1.9
MDL
1500
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Di-n-butyl phthalate
84-74-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.5-1.5
1.5
MDL
90
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Di-n-octyl phthalate
117-84-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.61 -0.61
0.61
MDL
20
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Fluoranthene
206-44-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.011 -0.011
0.011
MDL
80
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Fluorene
V
86-73-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0069-0.0069
0.0069
MDL
29
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Hexachlorobenzene
V
118-74-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.8-1.8
1.8
MDL
0.0098
RSL
0.133
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
Hexachlorobutadiene
V
87-68-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.6-1.6
1.6
MDL
0.14
RSL
0.414
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
Hexachloroethane
V
67-72-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.5-2.5
2.5
MDL
0.33
RSL
2.29
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
193-39-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0066-0.0066
0.0066
MDL
0.25
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Isophorone
78-59-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.7-1.7
1.7
MDL
78
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Naphthalene
V
91-20-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0073-0.0073
0.0073
MDL
0.12
RSL
6.29
No
No
MDL< SL
Nitrobenzene
V
98-95-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.4-2.4
2.4
MDL
0.14
RSL
99.3
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
621-64-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
0.011
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
86-30-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
3.4-3.4
3.4
MDL
12
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Pentachlorophenol
87-86-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.023-0.023
0.023
MDL
0.041
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Phenanthrene
V
85-01-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0083-0.0083
0.0083
MDL
180
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Phenol
108-95-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.4-2.4
2.4
MDL
580
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
-------
Table A2-12
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0510)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0510
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
Pyrene V
129-00-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1 0%
0.013-0.013
0.013 MDL
12
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
DIOX
Total PCDD/F TEQ (Mammal) V TEQ-M-DF N/A N/A |jg/L 0/1 0% N/A N/A - 0.00000012 * RSL 3.61 E-05 No No No values for dioxin TEQ
PCB
Total PCB TEQ (Mammal)
V
TEQ-M-PCB
5.8E-10
5.8E-10
mq/l
1/1
100%
N/A
5.8E-10
MDC
0.00000012
*
RSL
3.61 E-05
No
No
MDC < SL
Total PCB Congener
V
TPCB_CON
0.000044
J
0.000044
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
N/A
0.000044
MDC
0.044
*
RSL
1.65
No
No
MDC < SL
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA)
375-95-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0018-0.0018
0.0018
MDL
0.0059
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS)
355-46-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0018-0.0018
0.0018
MDL
0.039
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS)
375-73-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.00035-0.00035
0.00035
MDL
0.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
1763-23-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.00035-0.00035
0.00035
MDL
0.004
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
335-67-1
0.0011
J
0.0011
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.00035-0.00035
0.0011
MDC
0.006
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Total Metals
Aluminum
7429-90-5
90
90
mq/l
1/1
100%
4-4
90
MDC
2000
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Antimony
7440-36-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.32-0.32
0.32
MDL
0.78
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Arsenic
7440-38-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.33-0.33
0.33
MDL
0.052
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Barium
7440-39-3
1300
1300
mq/l
1/1
100%
1.9-1.9
1300
MDC
380
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Beryllium
7440-41-7
1.6
1.6
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.17-0.17
1.6
MDC
2.5
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Cadmium
7440-43-9
0.39
J
0.39
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.14-0.14
0.39
MDC
0.18
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Calcium
7440-70-2
9100
9100
mq/l
1/1
100%
120-120
9100
MDC
Nutrient
N/A
Nutrient
No
No
Classified as an essential nutrient
Chromium, Total
7440-47-3
0.69
J
0.69
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.32-0.32
0.69
MDC
2200
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Chromium, Hexavalent
18540-29-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1-1
1
MDL
0.035
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Cobalt
7440-48-4
20
20
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.19-0.19
20
MDC
0.6
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Copper
7440-50-8
100
100
mq/l
1/1
100%
"3-
O
I
o
100
MDC
80
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Iron
7439-89-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
54-54
54
MDL
1400
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Lead
7439-92-1
5.6
5.6
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.21 -0.21
5.6
MDC
15
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Manganese
7439-96-5
140
140
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.17-0.17
140
MDC
43
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Mercury
7439-97-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.06-0.06
0.06
MDL
0.2
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Nickel
7440-02-0
9.6
JB+
9.6
JB+
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.2-0.2
9.6
MDC
39
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Selenium
7782-49-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.2-1.2
1.2
MDL
10
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Silver
7440-22-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.18-0.18
0.18
MDL
9.4
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Thallium
7440-28-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.23-0.23
0.23
MDL
0.02
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Vanadium
7440-62-2
3.1
J
3.1
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
1.2-1.2
3.1
MDC
8.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Zinc
7440-66-6
69
69
mq/l
1/1
100%
1.6-1.6
69
MDC
600
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Total Cyanide
Cyanide V 57-12-5 11 11 |jg/L 1/1 100% 2.6-2.6 11 MDC 0.15 RSL 20.1 No Yes MDC>SL
Notes:
% = Percent
AL = Action Level
CASRN = Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number
-------
Table A2-12
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0510)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0510
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
COPC = Chemical of Potential Concern
DSA = Data Sensitivity Analysis
HAL = Health Advisory Level
J = Indicates an estimated value
MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level
MDC = Maximum Detected Concentration
N/A = Not Applicable
ND = Non-Detect or Not Detected
"PFOA and PFOS Combined" = Combined total of the detected concentrations of PFOA and PFOS (non-detect results were not included in the summation).
RL = Reporting Limit
RSL = Regional Screening Level
|jg/L = micrograms per liter
USEPA = United States Environmental Protection Agency
(1) "V" indicates that the chemical is volatile.
(2) Groundwater data screened against USEPA Tap Water RSLs, last updated May 2022 (TR = 1E-6, THQ = 0.1).
(3) An asterisk,"*", indicates surrogate toxicity information was used to derive a Screening Level (see Table A2-14).
(4) Groundwater data screened against USEPA Residential Groundwater VI SLs, last updated May 2022 (TR= 1E-6, THQ = 0.1). Site-specific, system temperature was set to 20.5 Celsius (average of recorded temperatures taken infield).
(6) Lead is compared to the EPA tap water RSL of 15 |jg/L, which represents the 90th percentile concentration of lead found in tap water samples collected nationwide (Lead and Copper Rule, 56 Federal Register 26460-26564, dated June 7,1991) and
is not a risk-based number, but rather an action level.
-------
Table A2-13
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0527)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0527
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
V
71-55-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.075-0.075
0.075
MDL
800
RSL
893
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
V
79-34-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.05-0.05
0.05
MDL
0.076
RSL
4.18
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
V
79-00-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.042-0.042
0.042
MDL
0.041
RSL
0.779
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane (Freon 113)
V
76-13-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.099-0.099
0.099
MDL
1000
RSL
28.5
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1-Dichloroethane
V
75-34-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.058-0.058
0.058
MDL
2.8
RSL
9.09
No
No
MDL< SL
1,1-Dichloroethene
V
75-35-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.064-0.064
0.064
MDL
28
RSL
22.7
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene
V
87-61-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.076-0.076
0.076
MDL
0.7
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2,3-Trichloropropane
V
96-18-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.077-0.077
0.077
MDL
0.00075
RSL
2.89
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
V
120-82-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.068-0.068
0.068
MDL
0.4
RSL
4.97
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene
V
95-63-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.051 -0.051
0.051
MDL
5.6
RSL
33
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane
V
96-12-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.14-0.14
0.14
MDL
0.00033
RSL
0.0381
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2-Dibromoethane
V
106-93-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.052-0.052
0.052
MDL
0.0075
RSL
0.221
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
V
95-50-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.045-0.045
0.045
MDL
30
RSL
351
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2-Dichloroethane
V
107-06-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.079-0.079
0.079
MDL
0.17
RSL
2.74
No
No
MDL< SL
1,2-Dichloropropane
V
78-87-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.069-0.069
0.069
MDL
0.82
RSL
4.44
No
No
MDL< SL
1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene
V
108-67-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.067-0.067
0.067
MDL
6
RSL
23.2
No
No
MDL< SL
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
V
541-73-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.071 -0.071
0.071
MDL
30
*
RSL
351
No
No
MDL< SL
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
V
106-46-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.047-0.047
0.047
MDL
0.48
RSL
3.42
No
No
MDL< SL
1,4-Dioxane
V
123-91-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.9-0.9
0.9
MDL
0.46
RSL
3570
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2-Butanone (MEK)
V
78-93-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
lo
I
lo
1.5
MDL
560
RSL
274000
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Hexanone
V
591-78-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.68-0.68
0.68
MDL
3.8
RSL
1060
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)
V
108-10-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
O
I
o
0.71
MDL
630
RSL
70200
No
No
MDL< SL
Acetone
V
67-64-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
1800
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzene
V
71-43-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.085-0.085
0.085
MDL
0.46
RSL
1.92
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromochloromethane
V
74-97-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.064-0.064
0.064
MDL
8.3
RSL
83.9
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromodichloromethane
V
75-27-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.062-0.062
0.062
MDL
0.13
RSL
1.08
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromoform
V
75-25-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.095-0.095
0.095
MDL
3.3
RSL
152
No
No
MDL< SL
Bromomethane
V
74-83-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.058-0.058
0.058
MDL
0.75
RSL
1.98
No
No
MDL< SL
Carbon disulfide
V
75-15-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.092-0.092
0.092
MDL
81
RSL
145
No
No
MDL< SL
Carbon tetrachloride
V
56-23-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.086-0.086
0.086
MDL
0.46
RSL
0.499
No
No
MDL< SL
Chlorobenzene
V
108-90-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.064-0.064
0.064
MDL
7.8
RSL
51.9
No
No
MDL< SL
Chloroethane
V
75-00-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.074-0.074
0.074
MDL
830
RSL
1050
No
No
MDL< SL
Chloroform
V
67-66-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.079-0.079
0.079
MDL
0.22
RSL
0.972
No
No
MDL< SL
Chloromethane
V
74-87-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.082-0.082
0.082
MDL
19
RSL
28.9
No
No
MDL< SL
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
V
156-59-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.075-0.075
0.075
MDL
3.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
V
10061-01-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.069-0.069
0.069
MDL
0.47
*
RSL
6.04
No
No
MDL< SL
Cyclohexane
V
110-82-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.065-0.065
0.065
MDL
1300
RSL
123
No
No
MDL< SL
Dibromochloromethane
V
124-48-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.073-0.073
0.073
MDL
0.87
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dichlorodifluoromethane
V
75-71-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.12-0.12
0.12
MDL
20
RSL
0.815
No
No
MDL< SL
Ethylbenzene
V
100-41-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.079-0.079
0.079
MDL
1.5
RSL
4.45
No
No
MDL< SL
-------
Table A2-13
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0527)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0527
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
Isopropylbenzene
V
98-82-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.076-0.076
0.076
MDL
45
RSL
121
No
No
MDL< SL
m,p-Xylene
V
179601-23-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.083-0.083
0.083
MDL
19
*
RSL
45.5
No
No
MDL< SL
Methyl Acetate
V
79-20-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.11 -0.11
0.11
MDL
2000
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Methyl Tert Butyl Ether
V
1634-04-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.053-0.053
0.053
MDL
14
RSL
533
No
No
MDL< SL
Methylcyclohexane
V
108-87-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.08-0.08
0.08
MDL
1300
*
RSL
123
No
No
MDL< SL
Methylene chloride
V
75-09-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.053-0.053
0.053
MDL
11
RSL
555
No
No
MDL< SL
o-Xylene
V
95-47-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.075-0.075
0.075
MDL
19
RSL
63.3
No
No
MDL< SL
Styrene
V
100-42-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.082-0.082
0.082
MDL
120
RSL
1210
No
No
MDL< SL
Tetrachloroethene
V
127-18-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.083-0.083
0.083
MDL
4.1
RSL
7.25
No
No
MDL< SL
Toluene
V
108-88-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.077-0.077
0.077
MDL
110
RSL
2390
No
No
MDL< SL
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
V
156-60-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.081 -0.081
0.081
MDL
6.8
RSL
12.9
No
No
MDL< SL
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
V
10061-02-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.07-0.07
0.07
MDL
0.47
*
RSL
6.04
No
No
MDL< SL
Trichloroethene
V
79-01-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.062-0.062
0.062
MDL
0.28
RSL
0.632
No
No
MDL< SL
Trichlorofluoromethane
V
75-69-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.11 -0.11
0.11
MDL
520
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Vinyl chloride
V
75-01-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.07-0.07
0.07
MDL
0.019
RSL
0.164
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs)
1,1 '-Biphenyl
V
92-52-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.9-1.9
1.9
MDL
0.083
RSL
4.71
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1,2,4,5-Tetrachlorobenzene
V
95-94-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
0.017
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
1-Methylnaphthalene
V
90-12-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0055-0.0055
0.0055
MDL
1.1
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,3,4,6-Tetrachlorophenol
58-90-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
24
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
95-95-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
120
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
88-06-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.7-1.7
1.7
MDL
1.2
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2,4-Dichlorophenol
120-83-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
4.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4-Dimethylphenol
105-67-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
36
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4-Dinitrophenol
51-28-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.98-0.98
0.98
MDL
3.9
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
121-14-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.2-2.2
2.2
MDL
0.24
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
606-20-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.9-1.9
1.9
MDL
0.049
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
2-Chloronaphthalene
V
91-58-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
75
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Chlorophenol
V
95-57-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
9.1
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Methylnaphthalene
V
91-57-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0066-0.0066
0.0066
MDL
3.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Methylphenol
95-48-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.6-2.6
2.6
MDL
93
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Nitroaniline
88-74-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
"3-
oo
I
oo
3.4
MDL
19
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
2-Nitrophenol
88-75-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.7-2.7
2.7
MDL
0.2
*
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine
91-94-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.7-1.7
1.7
MDL
0.13
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
3-Nitroaniline
99-09-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.67-0.67
0.67
MDL
19
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol
534-52-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
0.15
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
V
101-55-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
4
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Chloro-3-methyl phenol
59-50-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
140
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Chloroaniline
106-47-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
4.6-4.6
4.6
MDL
0.37
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
V
7005-72-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.4-2.4
2.4
MDL
4
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Methylphenol
106-44-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.6-2.6
2.6
MDL
37
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
-------
Table A2-13
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0527)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0527
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
4-Nitroaniline
100-01-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.85-0.85
0.85
MDL
3.8
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
4-Nitrophenol
100-02-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.4-2.4
2.4
MDL
0.2
*
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Acenaphthene
V
83-32-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0061 -0.0061
0.0061
MDL
53
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Acenaphthylene
V
208-96-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0069-0.0069
0.0069
MDL
53
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Acetophenone
V
98-86-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.2-2.2
2.2
MDL
190
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Anthracene
V
120-12-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.011 -0.011
0.011
MDL
180
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Atrazine
1912-24-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.48-0.48
0.48
MDL
0.3
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Benzaldehyde
V
100-52-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.5-2.5
2.5
MDL
19
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(a)anthracene
V
56-55-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0094-0.0094
0.0094
MDL
0.03
RSL
62.3
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(a)pyrene
50-32-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.017-0.017
0.017
MDL
0.025
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
205-99-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0082-0.0082
0.0082
MDL
0.25
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
V
191-24-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0069-0.0069
0.0069
MDL
12
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
207-08-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0041 -0.0041
0.0041
MDL
2.5
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
111-91-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.9-2.9
2.9
MDL
5.9
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
V
111-44-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.1 -2.1
2.1
MDL
0.014
RSL
17
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)ether
V
108-60-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.3-2.3
2.3
MDL
71
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate
117-81-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.82-0.82
0.82
MDL
5.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Butyl benzyl phthalate
85-68-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.4-1.4
1.4
MDL
16
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Caprolactam
105-60-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.8-1.8
1.8
MDL
990
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Carbazole
V
86-74-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
3.2-3.2
3.2
MDL
29
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Chrysene
218-01-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0054-0.0054
0.0054
MDL
25
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dibenzo(a, h)anthracene
53-70-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0059-0.0059
0.0059
MDL
0.025
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dibenzofuran
V
132-64-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.2-2.2
2.2
MDL
0.79
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Diethyl phthalate
84-66-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
1500
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Dimethyl phthalate
131-11-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2-2
2
MDL
1500
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Di-n-butyl phthalate
84-74-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.6-1.6
1.6
MDL
90
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Di-n-octyl phthalate
117-84-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.64-0.64
0.64
MDL
20
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Fluoranthene
206-44-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.012-0.012
0.012
MDL
80
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Fluorene
V
86-73-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0072-0.0072
0.0072
MDL
29
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Hexachlorobenzene
V
118-74-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.9-1.9
1.9
MDL
0.0098
RSL
0.133
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
Hexachlorobutadiene
V
87-68-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.7-1.7
1.7
MDL
0.14
RSL
0.414
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
V
77-47-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.6-1.6
1.6
MDL
0.041
RSL
0.0786
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
Hexachloroethane
V
67-72-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.6-2.6
2.6
MDL
0.33
RSL
2.29
See DSA
See DSA
MDL > SL
lndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
193-39-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0069-0.0069
0.0069
MDL
0.25
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Isophorone
78-59-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.8-1.8
1.8
MDL
78
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Naphthalene
V
91-20-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0077-0.0077
0.0077
MDL
0.12
RSL
6.29
No
No
MDL< SL
Nitrobenzene
V
98-95-3
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.5-2.5
2.5
MDL
0.14
RSL
99.3
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
N-Nitroso-di-n-propylamine
621-64-7
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.4-2.4
2.4
MDL
0.011
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
86-30-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
3.6-3.6
3.6
MDL
12
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Pentachlorophenol
87-86-5
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.024-0.024
0.024
MDL
0.041
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Phenanthrene
V
85-01-8
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0087-0.0087
0.0087
MDL
180
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
-------
Table A2-13
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0527)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0527
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
Phenol
108-95-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
2.5-2.5
2.5
MDL
580
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Pyrene
V
129-00-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.014-0.014
0.014
MDL
12
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
DIOX
Total PCDD/F TEQ (Mammal) V TEQ-M-DF N/A N/A |jg/L 0/1 0% N/A N/A - 0.00000012 * RSL 3.61 E-05 No No No values for dioxin TEQ
PCB
Total PCB TEQ (Mammal)
V
TEQ-M-PCB
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
N/A
N/A
-
0.00000012
*
RSL
3.61 E-05
No
No
No values for dioxin TEQ
Total PCB Congener
V
TPCB_CON
0.000071
J
0.000071
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
N/A
0.000071
MDC
0.044
*
RSL
1.65
No
No
MDC < SL
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA)
375-95-1
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.0018-0.0018
0.0018
MDL
0.0059
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS)
355-46-4
0.0017
J
0.0017
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.0018-0.0018
0.0017
MDC
0.039
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS)
375-73-5
0.012
0.012
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.00037-0.00037
0.012
MDC
0.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
1763-23-1
0.065
0.065
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.0018-0.0018
0.065
MDC
0.004
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
335-67-1
0.0047
0.0047
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.00037-0.00037
0.0047
MDC
0.006
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Total Metals
Aluminum
7429-90-5
100
100
mq/l
1/1
100%
4-4
100
MDC
2000
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Antimony
7440-36-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.32-0.32
0.32
MDL
0.78
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Arsenic
7440-38-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.33-0.33
0.33
MDL
0.052
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Barium
7440-39-3
130
130
mq/l
1/1
100%
1.9-1.9
130
MDC
380
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Beryllium
7440-41-7
0.33
J
0.33
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.17-0.17
0.33
MDC
2.5
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Cadmium
7440-43-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.14-0.14
0.14
MDL
0.18
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Calcium
7440-70-2
12000
12000
mq/l
1/1
100%
120-120
12000
MDC
Nutrient
N/A
Nutrient
No
No
Classified as an essential nutrient
Chromium, Total
7440-47-3
0.5
J
0.5
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.32-0.32
0.5
MDC
2200
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Chromium, Hexavalent
18540-29-9
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1-1
1
MDL
0.035
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Cobalt
7440-48-4
4.4
4.4
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.19-0.19
4.4
MDC
0.6
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Copper
7440-50-8
7.7
7.7
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.4-0.4
7.7
MDC
80
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Iron
7439-89-6
290
290
mq/l
1/1
100%
54-54
290
MDC
1400
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Lead
7439-92-1
0.55
J
0.55
J
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.21 -0.21
0.55
MDC
15
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Manganese
7439-96-5
56
J+
56
J+
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.17-0.17
56
MDC
43
RSL
No SL
No
Yes
MDC > SL
Mercury
7439-97-6
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.06-0.06
0.06
MDL
0.2
*
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Nickel
7440-02-0
3.2
3.2
mq/l
1/1
100%
0.2-0.2
3.2
MDC
39
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Selenium
7782-49-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.2-1.2
1.2
MDL
10
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Silver
7440-22-4
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.18-0.18
0.18
MDL
9.4
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Thallium
7440-28-0
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
0.23-0.23
0.23
MDL
0.02
RSL
No SL
No
See DSA
MDL > SL
Vanadium
7440-62-2
N/A
N/A
mq/l
0/1
0%
1.2-1.2
1.2
MDL
8.6
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDL< SL
Zinc
7440-66-6
22
22
mq/l
1/1
100%
1.6-1.6
22
MDC
600
RSL
No SL
No
No
MDC < SL
Total Cyanide
Cyanide V 57-12-5 N/A N/A |jg/L 0/1 0% 2.6-2.6 2.6 MDL 0.15 RSL 20.1 No See DSA MDL > SL
Notes:
% = Percent
AL = Action Level
-------
Table A2-13
Occurrence, Distribution, and Selection of Constituents of Interest (Direct Contact - OU2; Groundwater, Well 0527)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current and Future
Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Well: 0527
Chemical|1!
CASRN
Minimum Detected
Concentration
Maximum
Detected
Concentration
Units
Detection
Frequency
Range of Method
Detection Limits
Screening
Concentration
Screening
Level (2'3'5'6)
Source
VISL'4'
Exceed
VISL?
COPC
Flag
(Yes/No)
Rationale for
Selection/Deletion
CASRN = Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number
COPC = Chemical of Potential Concern
DSA = Data Sensitivity Analysis
HAL = Health Advisory Level
J = Indicates an estimated value
J+ = The result is an estimated quantity, but the result may be biased high.
MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level
MDC = Maximum Detected Concentration
N/A = Not Applicable
ND = Non-Detect or Not Detected
"PFOA and PFOS Combined" = Combined total of the detected concentrations of PFOA and PFOS (non-detect results were not included in the summation).
RL = Reporting Limit
RSL = Regional Screening Level
|jg/L = micrograms per liter
USEPA = United States Environmental Protection Agency
(1) "V" indicates that the chemical is volatile.
(2) Groundwater data screened against USEPA Tap Water RSLs, last updated May 2022 (TR = 1E-6, THQ = 0.1).
(3) An asterisk,"*", indicates surrogate toxicity information was used to derive a Screening Level (see Table A2-14).
(4) Groundwater data screened against USEPA Residential Groundwater VI SLs, last updated May 2022 (TR= 1E-6, THQ = 0.1). Site-specific, system temperature was set to 20.5 Celsius (average of recorded temperatures taken infield).
(6) Lead is compared to the EPA tap water RSL of 15 |jg/L, which represents the 90th percentile concentration of lead found in tap water samples collected nationwide (Lead and Copper Rule, 56 Federal Register 26460-26564, dated June 7,1991) and
is not a risk-based number, but rather an action level.
-------
Table A2-14
Surrogate Toxicity Used within Human Health Risk Assessment
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Chemical
CASRN
Surrogate
CASRN
1,1-Dichloropropene
563-58-6
1,3-Dichloropropene
542-75-6
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
541-73-1
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
95-50-1
1-Chlorohexane
544-10-5
Chlorobenzene
108-90-7
2,2-Dichloropropane
594-20-7
1,2-Dichloropropane
78-87-5
4-lsopropyltoluene
99-87-6
Cumene
98-82-8
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene
10061-01-5
1,3-Dichloropropene
542-75-6
m,p-Xylene
179601-23-1
m-Xylene
108-38-3
Methylcyclohexane
108-87-2
Cyclohexane
110-82-7
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
10061-02-6
1,3-Dichloropropene
542-75-6
2-Nitrophenol
88-75-5
2-Amino-4,6-dinitrophenol
96-91-3
3&4-Methylphenol
108-39-4/106-44
3-Methylphenol
108-39-4
3-Nitroaniline
99-09-2
2-Nitroaniline
88-74-4
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether
101-55-3
Pentabromodiphenyl ether
32534-81-9
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether
7005-72-3
Pentabromodiphenyl ether
32534-81-9
4-Nitrophenol
100-02-7
2-Amino-4,6-dinitrophenol
96-91-3
Acenaphthylene
208-96-8
Acenaphthene
83-32-9
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
191-24-2
Pyrene
129-00-0
Carbazole
86-74-8
Fluorene
86-73-7
Dimethyl phthalate
131-11-3
Diethyl phthalate
84-66-2
Phenanthrene
85-01-8
Anthracene
120-12-7
Total PCDD/F TEQ (Mammal)
TEQ-M-DF
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
1746-01-6
Total PCB TEQ (Mammal)
TEQ-M-PCB
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
1746-01-6
Total PCB Congener
TPCB_CON
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (low risk)
1336-36-3L
Chromium, Total
7440-47-3
Chromium, Trivalent
16065-83-1
Mercury
7439-97-6
Methyl Mercury
22967-92-6
Notes:
PCB = Polychlorinated Biphenyls
PCDD = Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins
CASRN = Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number
TEQ = Toxicity Equivalence Factor
-------
-------
Table A3-1
Exposure Point Concentration Summary (Groundwater)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
COPC
Units
Detection
Minimum
Maximum
Exposure Point Concentrationll!
Frequency
Concentration
Concentration
Value
Units
Statistic
Groundwater - Direct Contact (DC)
Well 0124
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
mg/L
1/1
0.000011
0.000011
0.000011
mg/L
Max
Barium
mg/L
1/1
0.48
0.48
0.48
mg/L
Max
Cobalt
mg/L
1/1
0.03
0.03
0.03
mg/L
Max
Copper
mg/L
1/1
0.25
0.25
0.25
mg/L
Max
Manganese
mg/L
1/1
0.19
0.19
0.19
mg/L
Max
Cyanide
mg/L
1/1
0.0046
0.0046
0.0046
mg/L
Max
Well 0155
Arsenic
mg/L
1/1
0.00038
0.00038
0.00038
mg/L
Max
Barium
mg/L
1/1
1.1
1.1
1.1
mg/L
Max
Cadmium
mg/L
1/1
0.00033
0.00033
0.00033
mg/L
Max
Cobalt
mg/L
1/1
0.015
0.015
0.015
mg/L
Max
Copper
mg/L
1/1
0.14
0.14
0.14
mg/L
Max
Lead
mg/L
1/1
0.023
0.023
0.023
mg/L
Max
Manganese
mg/L
1/1
0.12
0.12
0.12
mg/L
Max
Cyanide
mg/L
1/1
0.0048
0.0048
0.0048
mg/L
Max
Well 0170
Chloroform
mg/L
1/1
0.0014
0.0014
0.0014
mg/L
Max
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
mg/L
1/1
0.00026
0.00026
0.00026
mg/L
Max
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
mg/L
1/1
0.000015
0.000015
0.000015
mg/L
Max
Chromium, Hexavalent
mg/L
1/1
0.00587
0.00587
0.00587
mg/L
Max
Cobalt
mg/L
1/1
0.0065
0.0065
0.0065
mg/L
Max
Nickel
mg/L
1/1
0.053
0.053
0.053
mg/L
Max
Well 0173
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
mg/L
1/1
0.000024
0.000024
0.000024
mg/L
Max
Barium
mg/L
1/1
0.43
0.43
0.43
mg/L
Max
Cobalt
mg/L
1/1
0.022
0.022
0.022
mg/L
Max
Manganese
mg/L
1/1
0.22
0.22
0.22
mg/L
Max
Cyanide
mg/L
1/1
0.0095
0.0095
0.0095
mg/L
Max
Well 0176
Barium
mg/L
1/1
0.42
0.42
0.42
mg/L
Max
Cadmium
mg/L
1/1
0.0002
0.0002
0.0002
mg/L
Max
Cobalt
mg/L
1/1
0.014
0.014
0.014
mg/L
Max
Lead
mg/L
1/1
0.015
0.015
0.015
mg/L
Max
Manganese
mg/L
1/1
0.16
0.16
0.16
mg/L
Max
Cyanide
mg/L
1/1
0.009
0.009
0.009
mg/L
Max
Well 0182
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
mg/L
1/1
0.00022
0.00022
0.00022
mg/L
Max
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
mg/L
1/1
0.000013
0.000013
0.000013
mg/L
Max
Cobalt
mg/L
1/1
0.025
0.025
0.025
mg/L
Max
Manganese
mg/L
1/1
0.38
0.38
0.38
mg/L
Max
Cyanide
mg/L
1/1
0.0036
0.0036
0.0036
mg/L
Max
Well 0197
Chloroform
mg/L
1/1
0.00051
0.00051
0.00051
mg/L
Max
-------
Table A3-1
Exposure Point Concentration Summary (Groundwater)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
COPC
Units
Detection
Frequency
Minimum
Concentration
Maximum
Concentration
Exposure Point Concentration(1)
Value
Units
Statistic
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
mg/L
1/1
0.00015
0.00015
0.00015
mg/L
Max
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
mg/L
1/1
0.000016
0.000016
0.000016
mg/L
Max
Cadmium
mg/L
1/1
0.00033
0.00033
0.00033
mg/L
Max
Cobalt
mg/L
1/1
0.013
0.013
0.013
mg/L
Max
Manganese
mg/L
1/1
0.18
0.18
0.18
mg/L
Max
Cyanide
mg/L
1/1
0.0032
0.0032
0.0032
mg/L
Max
Well 0212
Chloroform
mg/L
1/1
0.00028
0.00028
0.00028
mg/L
Max
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
mg/L
1/1
0.000057
0.000057
0.000057
mg/L
Max
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
mg/L
1/1
0.000011
0.000011
0.000011
mg/L
Max
Cobalt
mg/L
1/1
0.0016
0.0016
0.0016
mg/L
Max
Copper
mg/L
1/1
0.29
0.29
0.29
mg/L
Max
Lead
mg/L
1/1
0.016
0.016
0.016
mg/L
Max
Well 0275
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
mg/L
1/1
0.00006
0.00006
0.00006
mg/L
Max
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
mg/L
1/1
0.0000074
0.0000074
7.4E-06
mg/L
Max
Cadmium
mg/L
1/1
0.0002
0.0002
0.0002
mg/L
Max
Cobalt
mg/L
1/1
0.0018
0.0018
0.0018
mg/L
Max
Iron
mg/L
1/1
2.9
2.9
2.9
mg/L
Max
Manganese
mg/L
1/1
0.056
0.056
0.056
mg/L
Max
Well 0500
Barium
mg/L
1/1
0.69
0.69
0.69
mg/L
Max
Beryllium
mg/L
1/1
0.0036
0.0036
0.0036
mg/L
Max
Cadmium
mg/L
1/1
0.00044
0.00044
0.00044
mg/L
Max
Cobalt
mg/L
1/1
0.026
0.026
0.026
mg/L
Max
Manganese
mg/L
1/1
0.18
0.18
0.18
mg/L
Max
Well 0501
Chloroform
mg/L
1/1
0.00096
0.00096
0.00096
mg/L
Max
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
mg/L
1/1
0.00013
0.00013
0.00013
mg/L
Max
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
mg/L
1/1
0.000017
0.000017
0.000017
mg/L
Max
Cobalt
mg/L
1/1
0.016
0.016
0.016
mg/L
Max
Manganese
mg/L
1/1
0.26
0.26
0.26
mg/L
Max
Well 0510
Barium
mg/L
1/1
1.3
1.3
1.3
mg/L
Max
Cadmium
mg/L
1/1
0.00039
0.00039
0.00039
mg/L
Max
Cobalt
mg/L
1/1
0.02
0.02
0.02
mg/L
Max
Copper
mg/L
1/1
0.1
0.1
0.1
mg/L
Max
Manganese
mg/L
1/1
0.14
0.14
0.14
mg/L
Max
Cyanide
mg/L
1/1
0.011
0.011
0.011
mg/L
Max
Well 0527
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
mg/L
1/1
0.000065
0.000065
0.000065
mg/L
Max
Cobalt
mg/L
1/1
0.0044
0.0044
0.0044
mg/L
Max
Manganese
mg/L
1/1
0.056
0.056
0.056
mg/L
Max
Notes:
-------
Table A3-1
Exposure Point Concentration Summary (Groundwater)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
COPC
Units
Detection
Minimum
Maximum
Exposure Point Concentration(1)
Frequency
Concentration
Concentration
Value Units Statistic
- = Not Evaluated mg/L = milligram per liter
COPC = Chemical of Potential Concern
(1) Data set too small to calculate meaningful statistics. Therefore, maximum concentration was used for exposure point concentration.
-------
Table A3-2
Exposure Point Concentration Summary (Vapor Intrusion - Groundwater)
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
COPC
Units
Detection
Minimum
Maximum
Exposure Point Concentration '1,2]
Frequencyll!
Concentration
Concentration
Value Units Statistic
Groundwater - Vapor Intrusion (VI) - Well 0170
Chloroform
pg/L
1/1
1.4
1.4
0.176 |jg/m3 Max
Notes:
- = Not Evaluated |jg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter
COPC = Chemical of Potential Concern |jg/L = microgram per liter
(1) Data set too small to calculate meaningful statistics. Therefore, maximum concentration was used for exposure point concentration.
(2) The maximum concentration was used to estimate an indoor air concentration using the USEPA Vapor Intrusion Screening Level
(VISL) Calculator (see Table A3-3). A site-specific system temperature of 20.5 Celsius was used.
-------
Table A3-3
Residential VISL Model Input Values for Vapor Intrusion from Groundwater
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Resident Air
Form-input
Variable
Default Value
Value
AFgw (Attenuation Factor Groundwater) unitless
0.001
0.001
AFSS (Attenuation Factor Sub-Slab) unitless
0.03
0.03
EDres (exposure duration) years
26
26
ED0_2 (mutagenic exposure duration tirst phase) years
2
2
ED2_6 (mutagenic exposure duration second phase) years
4
4
ED6_16 (mutagenic exposure duration third phase) years
10
10
ED-I6-26 (mutagenic exposure duration fourth phase) years
10
10
EFres (exposure frequency) days/year
350
350
EFq.2 (mutagenic exposure frequency tirst phase) days/year
350
350
EF2-6 (mutagenic exposure frequency second phase) days/year
350
350
EF6.16 (mutagenic exposure frequency third phase) days/year
350
350
EF16_26 (mutagenic exposure frequency fourth phase) days/year
350
350
ETres (exposure time) hours/day
24
24
ETq.2 (mutagenic exposure time tirst phase) hours/day
24
24
ET2-6 (mutagenic exposure time second phase) hours/day
24
24
ET6-i6 (mutagenic exposure time third phase) hours/day
24
24
ET16_26 (mutagenic exposure time fourth phase) hours/day
24
24
THQ (target hazard quotient) unitless
0.1
0.1
LT (lifetime) years
70
70
TR (target risk) unitless
0.000001
0.000001
-------
Table A3-3
Residential VISL Model Input Values for Vapor Intrusion from Groundwater
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Resident Vapor
Intrusion
Screening
Levels (VISL)
Is Chemical
Sufficiently
Is Chemical
Volatile and
Sufficiently
Target Sub-Slab
Does the
Toxic to Pose
Volatile and Toxic
Target Indoor
and Near-source
Does the
chemical
Inhalation Risk
to Pose Inhalation
Air
Soil Gas
chemical meet
have
Via Vapor
Risk Via Vapor
Concentration
Concentration
the definition
inhalation
Intrusion from
Intrusion from
(TCR=1E-06 or
(TCR=1E-06 or
for volatility?
toxicity data?
Soil Source?
Groundwater
THQ=0.1)
THQ=0.1)
CAS
(HLC>1E-5 or
(IUR and/or
(Cvp >
Source? (Che >
MIN(Cia,c,Cia,
Toxicity
Csg,Target
Chemical
Number
VP>1)
RfC)
Ci,a,Target?)
Ci,a,Target?)
nc) (|jg/m3)
Basis
(H9/m3)
Chloroform
67-66-3
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
1.22E-01
Cancer
4.07E+00
-------
Table A3-3
Residential VISL Model Input Values for Vapor Intrusion from Groundwater
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Resident Vapor
Intrusion
Screening
Levels (VISL)
Target
Groundwater
Temperature
Concentration
Is Target
Pure Phase
Maximum
for Maximum
Lower
(TCR=1E-06 or
Groundwater
Vapor
Groundwater
Groundwater
Explosive
THQ=0.1)
Concentration
Concentration
Vapor
Vapor
Limit LEL
Cgw,Target
< MCL? (Cgw
Cvp (25 °C)
Concentration
Concentration
(% by
LEL
IUR
IUR
RfC
Chemical
(M9/L)
< MCL?)
(|jg/m3)
Che (|jg/m3)
(°C)
volume)
Ref
(ug/m3)-1
Ref
(mg/m3)
Chloroform
9.72E-01
Yes (80)
1.26E+09
9.99E+08
2.05E+01
-
2.30E-05
IRIS
9.77E-02
-------
Table A3-3
Residential VISL Model Input Values for Vapor Intrusion from Groundwater
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Resident Vapor
Intrusion
Screening
Levels (VISL)
Carcinogenic
VISL TCR=1E-
Noncarcinogenic
RfC
Mutagenic
06
VISL THQ=0.1
Chemical
Ref
Indicator
Cia,c(|jg/m3)
Cia,nc(|jg/m3)
Chloroform
ATSDR
No
1.22E-01
1.02E+01
-------
Table A3-3
Residential VISL Model Input Values for Vapor Intrusion from Groundwater
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Resident
Vapor
Intrusion
Risk
Chemical
CAS Number
Site Groundwater
Concentration
Cgw (ng/L)
Site Indoor Air
Concentration Ci,a
(|jg/m3)
VI Carcinogenic
Risk CDI (|jg/m3)
VI Carcinogenic
Risk CR
VI Hazard
CDI
(mg/m3)
VI Hazard
HQ
IUR (ug/m3)-
1
IUR
Ref
Chloroform
67-66-3
1.40E+00
1.76E-01
6.26E-02
1.44E-06
1.69E-04
1.73E-03
2.30E-05
U
*Sum
-
-
-
1.44E-06
-
1.73E-03
-
-------
Table A3-3
Residential VISL Model Input Values for Vapor Intrusion from Groundwater
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Resident
Vapor
Intrusion
Risk
Chemical
Chronic
RfC
(mg/m3)
RfC
Ref
Temperature (°C) for
Groundwater Vapor
Concentration
Mutagen?
Chloroform
9.77E-02
U
2.05E+01
No
*Sum
-
-
-------
Table A3-3
Residential VISL Model Input Values for Vapor Intrusion from Groundwater
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Chemical
Properties
Does the chemical
Does the chemical
Henry's
meet the definition
have inhalation
Law
CAS
for volatility?
toxicity data? (IUR
MCL
HLC (atm-
Constant
Chemical
Number
(HLC>1E-5 or VP>1)
and/or RfC)
MW
MW Ref
S (mg/L)
S Ref
(ug/L)
m3/mole)
(unitless)
Chloroform
67-66-3
Yes
Yes
1.19E+02
PHYSPRO
7.95E+03
PHYSPRO
8.00E+01
3.67E-03
1.50E-01
-------
Table A3-3
Residential VISL Model Input Values for Vapor Intrusion from Groundwater
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Chemical
Properties
Henry's
Enthalpy of
Enthalpy of
Law
Henry's Law
vaporization @
vaporization at the
Constant
Constant
groundwater
normal boiling
Normal
Exponent
(20.5 °C)
Used in Calcs
H and HLC
temperature AHv.gw
point AHv,b
AHv,b
Boiling Point
for
Chemical
(unitless)
(unitless)
Ref
(cal/mol)
(cal/mol)
Ref
BP (K)
BP Ref
AHV.gW
Chloroform
1.26E-01
1.26E-01
PHYSPROP
7.45E+03
6.99E+03
CRC
3.34E+02
PHYSPROP
3.45E-01
-------
Table A3-3
Residential VISL Model Input Values for Vapor Intrusion from Groundwater
Reasonable Maximum Exposure
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Chemical
Properties
Vapor
Vapor
Pressure
Lower
Pressure
VP
Critical
Explosive
VP
VP
(20.5 °C)
Temperatur
Tc
Limit LEL (%
LEL
Chemical
(mm Hg)
Ref
(mm Hg)
e Tc (K)
Ref
by volume)
Ref
Chloroform
1.97E+02
PHYSPROP
1.62E+02
5.36E+02
CRC
-
-------
Environmental 1 ransport and bate Models
-------
Environmental Transport and Fate Models
Environmental transport and fate models are needed when data for chemical concentrations in
certain exposure media and/or at certain exposure locations are not available. A transport and
fate model may be a simple cross-media transfer calculation (e.g., volatilization from
groundwater) or complex mathematical simulation. This appendix describes the methods and
models for evaluating:
1) Permeability of inorganics and organics in water
a) Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS) Part D dermal worksheet for
groundwater (Table A4-3 [Reasonable Maximum Exposure (RME)])
2) Volatilization of organics from groundwater
a) Modeled groundwater to vapor concentrations while showering (Table A4-4)
Modeling the environmental transport and fate of chemicals requires the use of simplified
assumptions to simulate the environment. In reality, migration, dispersion, uptake, and
degradation of chemicals in environmental media involve many complex processes that are not
always accurately represented in models. Although the use of models does introduce a source of
uncertainty into the overall risk calculations, despite their shortcomings, models are useful tools
for developing a general understanding of chemical movement in the environment, which allows
the quantitative evaluation of some exposure pathways that would otherwise be limited to a
qualitative or descriptive evaluation. The uncertainties associated with modeling environmental
transport and fate is discussed in the uncertainty analysis in the human health risk assessment
(HHRA) section.
Steady-State Concentrations from Dermal Absorption of Water
EPA's RACjS Part E, Supplement Guidance for Dermal Risk Assessment (EPA, 2004) provides a
mathematical model to estimate chemical absorption from water through the skin of the receptor.
Dermal absorption of the groundwater is addressed for the resident.
The skin is assumed to be composed of two main layers, the stratum corneum and the viable
epidermis, with the stratum corneum as the main barrier to absorption. A two-compartment
distributed model was developed to describe the absorption of chemicals from water through the
skin as a function of both the thickness of the stratum corneum and the event duration (EPA,
2004).
The mathematical representation of the mass balance equation follows Fick's second law (as
described in EPA's RAGS Part E guidance) and is a partial differential equation with
concentration as a function of both time and distance. The exact solution of this model is
approximated by two algebraic equations for organics:
• DA-Event 1: describes the absorption process when the chemical is only in the stratum
corneum, i.e., non-steady state, where absorption is a function of t-event1/2
• DA-Event 2: describes the absorption process as a function of lag time (Tau-event) once
steady state is reached. One fundamental assumption is that absorption continues long
after the exposure has ended, i.e., the final absorbed dose (DAeVent) is estimated to be the
total dose dissolved in the skin at the end of the exposure (EPA, 2004).
Appendix D, Attachment 4, Page 1
-------
The DA-event equation for inorganics is solely based on the function of t-event. The DA-event
equations for organics and inorganics are documented in Table A4-3 using RAGS Part D
Dermal Worksheet format for the RME groundwater.
For highly lipophilic chemicals or for chemicals that are not highly lipophilic but exhibit a long
lag time (Tau-event), some of the chemical dissolved into the skin may be lost due to
desquamation (skin peeling) during that absorption period. A fraction absorbed term (FA) is
included in the evaluation of DAeVent to account for this loss of chemical due to desquamation.
For normal desquamation rates to completely replace the stratum corneum in about 14 days, only
chemicals with log Kow> 3.5 or chemicals with t-event> 10 hours (at any log Kow) would be
affected by this loss (EPA, 2004).
Volatilization of Organics from Groundwater
Vapor Concentrations while Showering
Modeled vapors in the shower due to volatilization from groundwater were estimated using the
Foster-Chrostowski model (Foster, S.A. andP.C. Chrostowski, June 1987 and 2003). Although
volatiles may gain access to ambient air from most typical household uses of groundwater,
showering produces higher concentrations because the warm water temperature facilitates
volatilization, and the volatilized chemicals and the receptor are confined in a relatively small
space. Chemical-specific parameters for the model (e.g., molecular weight, Henry's Law
Constant) were taken from EPA sources such as EPA's Regional Screening Level table (EPA,
2022a).
Table A4-4 presents the Foster-Chrostowski step-by-step equations used to estimate shower
vapor concentrations.
Groundwater to Indoor Air (Vapor Intrusion')
Onsite groundwater was screened against EPA's groundwater vapor intrusion screening levels
(VISLs) using EPA's on-line calculator (EPA, 2022b). VISLs were calculated using a residential
scenario, a target risk of 1 x 10"6, a target hazard quotient of 0.1, and a site-specific average
groundwater temperature of 20.5 °C (68.9 °F). The site-specific temperature was generated by
averaging the temperatures recorded in the field during sampling.
Volatile groundwater chemicals that exceeded the residential VISLs were carried forward as
COPCs. VISL was used to estimate indoor air concentrations for the commercial/industrial
worker and hypothetical resident scenarios. The VISL model output is provided in Table A3-3.
Appendix D, Attachment 4, Page 2
-------
REFERENCES
EPA, 2004. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund Volume 1: Human Health Evaluation
Manual (PartE, Supplemental Guidance for Dermal Risk Assessment), Final. Office of
Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation, EPA/540/R/99/005, OSWER
9285.7-02EP, July 2004.
EPA, 2011. Exposure Factors Handbook: 2011 Edition, National Center for Environmental
Assessment, Office of Research and Development. EPA/600/R-09/052F, September
2011.
EPA, 2022a. User's Guide and Regional Screening Levels Tables Dated May 2022.
http://www.epa.gov/reg3hwmd/risk/human/rb-concentration_table/usersguide.htm.
EPA, 2022b. Vapor Intrusion Screening Level (VISL) On-Line Calculator. May 2022.
http://www.epa.g0v/oswer/vaporintrusion/guidance.html#Item6
Foster, S.A. andP.C. Chrostowski, 1987. "Inhalation Exposures to Volatile Organic
Contaminants in the Shower." Presentation at the 80th Annual Meeting of the Air
Pollution Control Association.
Foster and Chrostowski, 2003. Integrated Human Exposure Model, Version 2 (IHEM2) for
Volatile Organic Compounds. Prepared for Syracuse Research Corporation/EPA under
EPA Grant No. CR-8310921-0. December 26, 2003.
Appendix D, Attachment 4, Page 3
-------
Table A4-1
Values Used for Daily Intake and Dermally Absorbed Dose Calculations
Reasonable Maximum Exposure: Incidental Ingestion and Dermal Absorption of Groundwater
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: CuirenUFuture
Medium: Groundwater
Exposure Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Exposure Route
Receptor Population
Receptor
Age
Exposure Point
Parameter
Code
Parameter Definition
Value
Units
Rationale/ Reference
Intake and Dermally Absoibed Dose Equations/ Model Name
(Current/Future)
Ingestion of Groundwater
(Potable Use)
Non-Mutagenic Constituents
Daily Intake (mg/kg-day) for carcinogens (adult) =
CGW x IRGWa x EF x FI-GW x EDa
Daily Intake
mg/kg-day
CGW
Exposure Point Concentration, groundwater
Site-Specific
mg/L
IRGWa
Ingestion Rate, groundwater - adult
2.5
L/day
USEPA, 2014 (USEPA 2011; Table 3-33; 90th percentile of
consumer-only ingestion of drinking water (2 21 years))
BWa x ATc
Daily Intake (mg/kg-day) for noncarcinogens (adult) =
CGW x IRGWa x EF x FI-GW x EDa
FI-GW
Fraction Ingested from Source, groundwater
1
unitless
USEPA, 1989 (Default of 1 (100%) is assumed)
EF
Exposure Frequency
350
days/year
USEPA, 2014 (USEPA 1991; pg 15)
BWaxATnc,a
Daily Intake for carcinogens (lifetime) (mg/kg-day) =
[Dl for carcinogens (adult) + Dl for carcinogens (child)]
EDa
Exposure Duration, adult
20
years
USEPA, 2014 (EDr(26 years) - EDc (6 years))
BWa
Body Weight, adult
80
kg
USEPA, 2014 (USEPA, 2011; Tables 8-3; weighted mean
values adults 21-78)
ATc
Averaging Time, carcinogens
25550
days
USEPA, 1989 (ED (70 years) x 365 days/year)
ATnc,a
Averaging Time, noncarcinogens - adult
7300
days
USEPA, 1989 (ED x 365 days/year)
Ingestion
On-Site Resident
(Current/Future)
Child
Ingestion of Groundwater
(Potable Use)
Non-Mutagenic Constituents
Daily Intake (mg/kg-day) for carcinogens (child) =
CGW x IRGWc x EF x FI-GW x EDc
Dl
Daily Intake
Calculated
mg/kg-day
See equations
CGW
Exposure Point Concentration, groundwater
Site-Specific
mg/L
IRGWc
Ingestion Rate, groundwater - child
0.78
L/day
USEPA, 2014 (USEPA 2011; Tables 3-15 and 3-33; weighted
average of 90th percentile consumer-only ingestion of drinking
water (birth < 6 years))
BWc x ATc
Daily Intake (mg/kg-day) for noncarcinogens (child) =
CGW x IRGWc x EF x FI-GW x EDc
FI-GW
Fraction Ingested from Source, groundwater
1
unitless
USEPA, 1989 (Default of 1 (100%) is assumed)
EF
Exposure Frequency
350
days/year
USEPA, 2014 (USEPA 1991; pg 15)
BWcxATnc,c
Daily Intake for carcinogens (lifetime) (mg/kg-day) =
[Dl for carcinogens (adult) + Dl for carcinogens (child)]
EDc
Exposure Duration, child
6
years
USEPA, 2014 (USEPA 1991; pp 6 and 15)
BWc
Body Weight, child
15
kg
USEPA, 2014 (USEPA 2011; Table 8-1; weighted average of
mean body weights (birth to < 6 years))
ATc
Averaging Time, carcinogens
25550
days
USEPA, 1989 (ED (70 years) x 365 days/year)
ATnc,c
Averaging Time, noncarcinogens - child
2190
days
USEPA, 1989 (ED x 365 days/year)
Ingestion
On-Site Resident
(Current/Future)
Lifetime
Ingestion of Groundwater
(Potable Use)
Mutagenic Constituents
Daily Intake (mg/kg-day) for mutagenic carcinogens (lifetime) =
CGW x FI-GW xlFWMadi
Dl
Daily Intake
Calculated
mg/kg-day
See equations
CGW
Exposure Point Concentration, groundwater
Site-Specific
mg/L
FI-GW
Fraction Ingested from Source, groundwater
1
unitless
USEPA, 1989 (Default of 1 (100%) is assumed)
ATc
Where IFWMadj (L/kg) =
EFxlRGWc „ . -
BWC X[(ED0-2X™F0-2MED2.6XADAF2.6)]»
BW "[(ed6-16,adaf6-16Hed16-26,adaf16-26)]
IFWMadj
Mutagenic Water Ingestion Rate - Age-adjusted
1019.9
L/kg
See equations
ATc
Averaging Time, carcinogens
25550
days
USEPA, 1989 (ED (70 years) x 365 days/year)
EF
Exposure Frequency
350
days/year
USEPA, 2014 (USEPA 1991; pg 15)
IRGWc
Ingestion Rate, groundwater - child
0.78
L/day
USEPA, 2014 (USEPA 2011; Tables 3-15 and 3-33; weighted
average of 90th percentile consumer-only ingestion of drinking
water (birth < 6 years))
BWc
Body Weight, child
15
kg
USEPA, 2014 (USEPA 2011; Table 8-1; weighted average of
mean body weights (birth to < 6 years))
EDO-2
Exposure Duration, 0-2 years
2
years
USEPA, 2005
ADAFO-2
Age Depend. Adjust. Factor, 0-2 years
10
unitless
USEPA, 2005
ED2-6
Exposure Duration, 2-6 years
4
years
USEPA, 2005
ADAF2-6
Age Depend. Adjust. Factor, 2-6 years
3
unitless
USEPA, 2005
ED6-16
Exposure Duration, 6-16 years
10
years
USEPA, 2005
ADAF6-16
Age Depend. Adjust. Factor, 6-16 years
3
unitless
USEPA, 2005
ED16-26
Exposure Duration, 16-26 years
10
years
USEPA, 2005
ADAF16-26
Age Depend. Adjust. Factor, 16-26 years
1
unitless
USEPA, 2005
IRGWa
Ingestion Rate, groundwater - adult
2.5
L/day
USEPA, 2014 (USEPA 2011; Table 3-33; 90th percentile of
consumer-only ingestion of drinking water (2 21 years))
BWa
Body Weight, adult
80
kg
USEPA, 2014 (USEPA, 2011; Tables 8-3; weighted mean
values adults 21-78)
IFWadj
Water Ingestion Rate - Age-adjusted
327.95
L/kg
See equations
-------
Table A4-1
Values Used for Daily Intake and Dermally Absorbed Dose Calculations
Reasonable Maximum Exposure: Incidental Ingestion and Dermal Absorption of Groundwater
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: CuirenUFuture
Medium: Groundwater
Exposure Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Exposure Route
Receptor Population
Receptor
Age
Exposure Point
Parameter
Code
Parameter Definition
Value
Units
Rationale/ Reference
Intake and Dermally Absoifoed Dose Equations/ Model Name
Dermal Absorption
(Current/Future)
Dermal Absorption of
Groundwater
(Potable Use)
Non-Mutagenic Constituents
Dermally Absorbed Dose (mgftg-day) for carcinogens (adult) =
DA-event x EV x EF x FC-GW x EDa x SA-GWa
Dermally Absorbed Dose
mgftg-day
,
DA-event
Absorbed Dose per Event
Calculated
mgfcm2-event
USE PA, 2004
EV
Event Frequency
1
events/day
USEPA, 2004
BWa x ATc
Dermally Absorbed Dose (mgftg-day) for noncarcinogens (adult) =
DA-event x EV x EF x FC-GW x EDa x SA-GWa
EF
Exposure Frequency
350
days/year
USEPA, 2014 (USEPA 1991; pg 15)
FC-GW
Fraction of Contact from Source, groundwater
1
unitless
USEPA, 1989 (Default of 1 (100°/c) is assumed)
EDa
Exposure Duration, adult
20
years
USEPA, 2014 (EDr(26 years) - EDc (6 years))
SA-GWa
Skin Surface Area - groundwater, adult
19652
cm2
USEPA, 2014 (USEPA 2011; Table 7-9; weighted average of
mean values for male and female adults, 21-78))
BWaxATnc,a
Where:
For organic compounds in which t-event,a £ t-star:
DA-event (Absorbed Dose per Event[mgfcm2-event]) =
2 x FA x Kp x CGW x CF1 x SQRT([6 x tau-event x t-event,a]/n)
For organic compounds in which t-event,a > t-star:
DA-event (Absorbed Dose per Event[mgfcm2-event]) =
FA x Kp x CGW x CF1 x {It-event,a / (1 + B)] + (2 x tau-event) x [(1 + 3B +3B2) / (1 + B)2]}
For inorganic compounds:
DA-event (Absorbed Dose per Event[mgfcm2-event]) =
KpxCGWx CF1 xt-event,a
Dermally Absorbed Dose (mgftg-day) for carcinogens (lifetime) =
[DAD for carcinogens (adult) + DAD for carcinogens (child)]
BWa
Body Weight, adult
80
kg
USEPA, 2014 (USEPA, 2011; Tables 8-3; weighted mean
values adults 21-78)
ATc
Averaging Time, carcinogens
25550
days
USEPA, 1989 (ED (70 years) x 365 days/year)
ATnc,a
Averaging Time, noncarcinogens - adult
7300
days
USEPA, 1989 (ED x 365 days/year)
t-star
Time to reach steady-state
Chemical-specific
hour
USEPA, 2004; tau-event x 2.4
FA
Fraction Absorbed, water
Chemical-specific
unitless
USEPA,2004
Kp
Permeability Coefficient, water
Chemical-specific
cm/hour
USEPA, 2004
CGW
Exposure Point Concentration, groundwater
Site-Specific
mgfl.
CF1
Conversion Factor 1
0.001
L/cm3
tau-event
Lag time per event
Chemical-specific
hours/event
USEPA, 2004
t-event,a
Event Duration, adult
0.71
hours/event
USEPA, 2014 (USEPA 2011; Tables 16-30 and 16-31;
weighted average of adult (21 to 78) 90th percentile of time
spent bathingtehowering in a day, divided by mean number of
baths/showers taken in a day)
B
Ratio of Kp through stratum comeum relative to
compound's Kp across the viable epidermis
Chemical-specific
unitless
USEPA,2004
Dermal Absorption
On-Site Resident
(Current/Future)
Child
Dermal Absorption of
Groundwater
(Potable Use)
Non-Mutagenic Constituents
Dermally Absorbed Dose (mgftg-day) for carcinogens (child) =
DA-event x EV x EF x FC-GW x EDc x SA-GWc
DAD
Dermally Absorbed Dose
Calculated
mgftg-day
See equations
DA-event
Absorbed Dose per Event
Calculated
mgfcm2-event
USEPA, 2004
EV
Event Frequency
1
events/day
USEPA, 2004
BWc x ATc
Dermally Absorbed Dose (mgftg-day) for noncarcinogens (child) =
DA-event x EV x EF x FC-GW x EDc x SA-GWc
EF
Exposure Frequency
350
days/year
USEPA, 2014 (USEPA 1991; pg 15)
FC-GW
Fraction of Contact from Source, groundwater
1
unitless
USEPA, 1989 (Default of 1 (100%) is assumed)
EDc
Exposure Duration, child
6
years
USEPA, 2014 (USEPA 1991; pp 6 and 15)
SA-GWc
Skin Surface Area - groundwater, child
6365
cm2
USEPA, 2014 (USEPA 2011; Table 7-9; weighted average of
mean values for male and female children <6 years)
BWcxATnc,c
Where:
For organic compounds in which t-event,c £ t-star:
DA-event (Absorbed Dose per Event[mgfcm2-event]) =
2 x FA x Kp x CGW x CF1 x SQRT[(6 x tau-event x t-event,cyn]
For organic compounds in which t-event,c > t-star:
DA-event (Absorbed Dose per Event[mgfcm2-event]) =
FA x Kp x CGW x CF1 x {It-event,c / (1 + B)] + (2 x tau-event) x [(1 + 3B +3B2) / (1 + B)2]}
For inorganic compounds:
DA-event (Absorbed Dose per Event[mgfcm2-event]) =
Kp x CGW x CF1 x t-event,c
Dermally Absorbed Dose (mgftg-day) for carcinogens (lifetime) =
[DAD for carcinogens (adult) + DAD for carcinogens (child)]
BWc
Body Weight, child
15
kg
USEPA, 2014 (USEPA 2011; Table 8-1; weighted average of
mean body weights (birth to < 6 years))
ATc
Averaging Time, carcinogens
25550
days
USEPA, 1989 (ED (70 years) x 365 days/year)
ATnc,c
Averaging Time, noncarcinogens - child
2190
days
USEPA, 1989 (ED x 365 days/year)
t-star
Time to reach steady-state
Chemical-specific
hour
USEPA, 2004; tau-event x 2.4
FA
Fraction Absorbed, water
Chemical-specific
unitless
USEPA,2004
Kp
Permeability Coefficient, water
Chemical-specific
cm/hour
USEPA, 2004
CGW
Exposure Point Concentration, groundwater
Site-Specific
mgfl.
CF1
Conversion Factor 1
0.001
L/cm3
tau-event
Lag time per event
Chemical-specific
hours/event
USEPA, 2004
t-event,c
Event Duration, child
0.54
hours/event
USEPA, 2014 (USEPA 2011; Table 16-28; weighted average
of 90th percentile time spent bathing (birth to < 6 years))
B
Ratio of Kp through stratum comeum relative to
compound's Kp across the viable epidermis
Chemical-specific
unitless
USEPA,2004
Dermal Absorption
On-Site Resident
(Current/Future)
Lifetime
Dermal Absorption of
Groundwater
(Potable Use)
Mutagenic Constituents
Dermally Absorbed Dose (mgftg-day) for mutagenic carcinogens (lifetime) =
DA-event x DFWMadj
ATc
Where:
For organic compounds in which ETewrt.res^d| £ t-star
DA-event (Absorbed Dose per Event[mgfcm2-event]) =
2 x FA x Kp x CGW x CF1 x SQRT([6 x tau-event x ETroert.res.ad|yn)
DAD
Dermally Absorbed Dose
Calculated
mgftg-day
See equations
DA-event
Absorbed Dose per Event
Calculated
mgfcm2-event
USEPA, 2004
DFWMadj
8191633
cm2-event/kg
See equations
ATc
Averaging Time, carcinogens
25550
days
USEPA, 1989 (ED (70 years) x 365 days/year)
ETevert-res-ad,
Resident Water Exposure Time - Age Adjusted
0.6708
hours/event
USEPA, 2005
t-star
Time to reach steady-state
Chemical-specific
hour
USEPA, 2004; tau-event x 2.4
FA
Fraction Absorbed, water
Chemical-specific
unitless
USEPA,2004
Kp
Permeability Coefficient, water
Chemical-specific
cm/hour
USEPA, 2004
-------
Table A4-1
Values Used for Daily Intake and Dermally Absorbed Dose Calculations
Reasonable Maximum Exposure: Incidental Ingestion and Dermal Absorption of Groundwater
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: CuirenUFuture
Medium: Groundwater
Exposure Medium: Groundwater (Drinking Water)
Exposure Route
Dermal Absorption
Receptor Population
On-Site Resident
(Current/Future)
Receptor
Age
Lifetime
Dermal Absorption of
Groundwater
(Potable Use)
Parameter
Code
Parameter Definition
Exposure Point Concentration, groundwater
Value
Site-Specific
Units
mgfl.
Rationale/ Reference
CGW
CF1
tau-event
Lag time per event
Chemical-specific
hours/event
USEPA,2004
B
Ratio of Kp through stratum comeum relative to
compound's Kp across the viable epidermis
Chemical-specific
unitless
USEPA, 2004
t-event,c
Event Duration, child
0.54
hours/event
USEPA, 2014 (USEPA 2011; Table 16-28; weighted average
of 90th percentile time spent bathing (birth to < 6 years))
EDO-2
Exposure Duration, 0-2 years
2
years
USEPA, 2005
ED2-6
Exposure Duration, 2-6 years
4
years
USEPA, 2005
ED6-16
Exposure Duration, 6-16 years
10
years
USEPA, 2005
ED16-26
Exposure Duration, 16-26 years
10
years
USEPA, 2005
ADAFO-2
Age Depend. Adjust. Factor, 0-2 years
10
unitless
USEPA, 2005
ADAF2-6
Age Depend. Adjust. Factor, 2-6 years
3
unitless
USEPA, 2005
ADAF6-16
Age Depend. Adjust. Factor, 6-16 years
3
unitless
USEPA, 2005
ADAF16-26
Age Depend. Adjust. Factor, 16-26 years
1
unitless
USEPA, 2005
t-event,a
Event Duration, adult
0.71
hours/event
USEPA, 2014 (USEPA 2011; Tables 16-30 and 16-31;
weighted average of adult (21 to 78) 90th percentile of time
spent bathingtehowering in a day, divided by mean number of
baths/showers taken in a day)
EV
Event Frequency
1
events/day
USEPA, 2004
EF
Exposure Frequency
350
days/year
USEPA, 2014 (USEPA 1991; pg 15)
SA-GWc
Skin Surface Area - groundwater, child
6365
cm2
USEPA, 2014 (USEPA 2011; Table 7-9; weighted average of
mean values for male and female children <6 years)
BWc
Body Weight, child
15
kg
USEPA, 2014 (USEPA 2011; Table 8-1; weighted average of
mean body weights (birth to < 6 years))
SA-GWa
Skin Surface Area - groundwater, adult
19652
cm2
USEPA, 2014 (USEPA 2011; Table 7-9; weighted average of
mean values for male and female adults, 21-78))
BWa
Body Weight, adult
80
kg
USEPA, 2014 (USEPA, 2011; Tables 8-3; weighted mean
values adults 21-78)
DFWadj
Dermal water contact factor- age-adjusted
2610650
cm2-event/kg
See equations
EDc
Exposure Duration, child
6
years
USEPA, 2014 (USEPA 1991; pp 6 and 15)
EDa
Exposure Duration, adult
20
years
USEPA, 2014 (EDr(26 years) - EDc (6 years))
Intake and Dermally Absoibed Dose Equations/ Model Name
For organic compounds in which ET > t-stai:
DA-event (Absorbed Dose per Event[mgfcm2-event]) =
FA x Kp x CGW x CF1 x flErewrt.re^d| / (1 + B)] + (2 x tau-event) x [(1 + 3B +3B2) / (1 + B f_
For inorganic compounds:
DA-event (Absorbed Dose per Event[mgfcm2-event]) =
Kp x CGW x CF1 x ETewrt.res^d|
Resident Water Exposure Time - Age Adjusted (hours/event) =
t-event,c x (EDq-2 -^D^g) +t-event,a x (EDg.16+ED1g.2g)
EDq-2 + ED2-6 + ED6_16 +ED16_26
Resident Water Dermal Contact Factor - Age Adjusted (cm2-event/kg) =
r,,rr. . fEDcx SA"GWC EDgX SA"GWa\
^ BWC + BWa )
Resident Mutagenic Water Dermal Contact Factor - Age Adjusted (cm2-event/kg) =
SA-GW,
EVxEFx
BWC
SA-GWg
. BWa
± x(ED0_2x ADAF0_2+ED2-6x ADAF2_6) -
CED6-16x ADAFg-^+ED^.^x ADAF16_26)
Notes:
- Not applicaple
References:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 1989. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. Human Health Evaluation Manual. Part A Interim Final. 9285.701A.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2004. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund Volume 1: Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part E, Supplemental Guidance for Dermal Risk Assessment), Final, July 2004.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2005. Supplemental Guidance for Assessing Susceptibility from Early-Life Exposure to Carcinogens. Risk Assessment Forum, EPA Washington, DC. 20460, EPW63Q/R-03/003F. March.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2011. Exposure Factors Handbook: 2011 Edition. EPW 600/R-090/052F, September 2011.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2014. Human Health Evaluation Manual. Supplemental Guidance: Update of Standard Default Exposure Factors. Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. OSWER Directive 9200.1-120. February 6. Amended September 2015.
-------
Table A4-2
Values Used for Daily Intake Calculations
Reasonable Maximum Exposure: Inhalation of Vapors from Groundwaters Indoor Air (Shower/Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current/Future
Medium: Groundwater
Exposure Medium: Air
Exposure Route
Receptor Population
Receptor
Aae
Exposure Point
Parameter
Code
Parameter Definition
Value
Units
Rationale/ Reference
Intake and Dermally Absorbed Dose Equations/ Model Name
t
Inhalation of Groundwater
Non-Mutagenic Constituents
(Current/Future)
Vapors in Indoor Air
EC
Exposure concentration
Calculated
|jg/m3
See equations
Exposure concentration (ngftn3) for carcinogens (lifetime) =
(Showering)
CA
Exposure Point Concentration, shower air
Modeled
|jg/m3
Calculated (See Attachment A4)
CA x ETs x EV x EF x FH-GW x EDa X CF2
ETs
Exposure Time, shower
0.33
hours/event
See equations
ATcx CF1 X CF2
EV
Event Frequency
l
event/day
Ds
Shower Duration
0.71
hour/event
USEPA,2014
Exposure concentration (jjg/m3) for non-carcinogens (lifetime) =
Ra
Air Exchange Rate
0.0167
1/hr
Foster and Chrostowski, 1987
CA x ETs x EV x EF x FH-GW x EDa X CF2
USEPA, 2011; Table 16-29, 95th percentile value of 60 min (1
ATnc,a x CF1
ts,a
Total Time in Shower Room
1
hour
hour) for 16 to <21 years, total time spent in bathroom for
shower and remaining in enclosed bathroom.
Where:
EF
Exposure Frequency
350
days/year
USEPA, 2014(USEPA, 1991; pg 15)
Exposure Time, shower (hr/event) =
FH-GW
Fraction Inhaled from Source, groundwater
1
unitless
USEPA, 1989 (Default of 1 (100°/Q is assumed)
[ e(-Ra«ts,a) e(Ra«(Ds-ts,a))l
EDa
Exposure Duration, adult
20
years
USEPA, 2014 (EDr (26 years) - EDc (6 years))
ATc
Averaging Time, carcinogens
25550
days
USEPA, 1989 (ED (70 years) x 365 days/year)
L Ra Ra J
ATnc,a
Averaging Time, noncarcinogens- adult
7300
days
USEPA, 1989 (ED x 365 days/year)
Note: It is assumed that the child resident does not take showers; however, early life exposure
CF1
Conversion Factor 1
24
hours/day
via bathing is taken into account with the mutagenic calculations.
CF2
Conversion Factor 2
1000
jjg/mg
Inhalation
On-Site Resident
Lifetime
Inhalation of Groundwater
Mutagenic Constituents
(Current/Future)
Vapors in Indoor Air
EC
Exposure concentration
Calculated
|jg/m3
See equations
Exposure concentration (ngftn3) for mutagenic carcinogens (lifetime) =
(Bathing'Shower)
CA
Exposure Point Concentration, shower air
Modeled
|jg/m3
Calculated (See Attachment A4)
EF
Exposure Frequency
350
days/year
USEPA, 2014(USEPA, 1991; pg 15)
CAxEFxEVxETs-adj |Y EDq_2X ADAFq_2+ED2-0X ADAF2-0+ \1
ATc
Averaging Time, carcinogens
25550
days
USEPA, 1989 (ED (70 years) x 365 days/year)
ATcxCF1 " |\ED6_16xADAF6_16+ED16_26XADAF16_26/]
CF1
Conversion Factor 1
24
hours/day
EDO-2
Exposure Duration, 0-2 years
2
years
USEPA, 2005
Where:
ADAFO-2
Age Depend. Adjust. Factor, 0-2 years
10
unitless
USEPA, 2005
Exposure Time, shower - age adjusted (hr/event) =
ED2-6
Exposure Duration, 2-6 years
4
years
USEPA, 2005
[ e(-Ra * ts-adj) e(Ra*(Ds ts adj))l
ADAF2-6
Age Depend. Adjust. Factor, 2-6 years
3
unitless
USEPA, 2005
ED6-16
Exposure Duration, 6-16years
10
years
USEPA, 2005
L Ra Ra J
ADAF6-16
Age Depend. Adjust. Factor, 6-16 years
3
unitless
USEPA, 2005
ED16-26
Exposure Duration, 16-26 years
10
years
USEPA, 2005
Total Time in Shower Room - age adjusted (hour) =
ADAF16-26
Age Depend. Adjust. Factor, 16-26 years
1
unitless
USEPA, 2005
EDr
Exposure Duration, lifetime
26
years
USEPA, 2014 (USEPA, 2011; Table 16-108; 90th percentile for
current residence time)
ts,c x (ED0_2 +ED2-e) +ts,a x (ED6_16+ED16_26)
EDq-2 + ED2-6 + ED6_16 +ED16_26
EV
Event Frequency
1
events/day
USEPA, 2004
CF2
Conversion Factor 2
0.0167
hr/min
ETs-adj
Exposure Time, shower - age adjusted
0.31
hours/event
See equations
Ds-adj
Shower Duration
0.625
hours/event
USEPA, 2014; average of child and adult resident water
exposure times of 0.54 hours/event and 0.71 hours/event
Ra
Air Exchange Rate
0.0167
1/hr
Foster and Chrostowski, 1987
ts-adj
Total Time in Shower Room - age adjusted
1
hour
See equations
USEPA, 2011; Table 16-29, 95th percentile value of 60 min (1
ts,c
Total Time in Bathroom - child
1
hour
hour) for 3 to < 6 years old, total time spent taking a bath and
remaining in enclosed bathroom.
USEPA, 2011; Table 16-29, 95th percentile value of 60 min (1
ts,a
Total Time in Bathroom - adult
1
hour
hour) for 16 to <21 years, total time spent in bathroom for
shower and remaining in enclosed bathroom.
Inhalation
On-Site Resident
Adult
Inhalation of Groundwater
Non-Mutagenic Constituents
(Current/Future)
Vapors in Indoor Air
EC
Exposure concentration
Calculated
jjg/m3
See equations
Exposure concentration (jjg/m3) for carcinogens (adult) =
(Vapor Intrusion)
CA
Exposure Point Concentration, indoor air
Modeled
jjg/m3
Calculated (See Attachment A4)
CA x ET xEFx FH-GW x EDa
ET
Exposure Time
24
hours/day
USEPA,2014
ATcx CF1
EF
Exposure Frequency
350
days/year
USEPA, 2014(USEPA, 1991; pg 15)
FH-GW
Fraction Inhaled from Source, groundwater
1
unitless
USEPA, 1989 (Default of 1 (100°/Q is assumed)
Exposure concentration (jjg/m3) for non-carcinogens (adult) =
EDa
Exposure Duration, adult
20
years
USEPA, 2014 (EDr (26 years) - EDc (6 years))
CA x ET xEFx FH-GW x EDa
ATc
Averaging Time, carcinogens
25550
days
USEPA, 1989 (ED (70 years) x 365 days/year)
ATnc,ax CF1
-------
Table A4-2
Values Used for Daily Intake Calculations
Reasonable Maximum Exposure: Inhalation of Vapors from Groundwaters Indoor Air (Shower/Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current/Future
Medium: Groundwater
Exposure Medium: Air
Exposure Route
Receptor Population
Receptor
Aae
Exposure Point
Parameter
Code
Parameter Definition
Value
Units
Rationale/ Reference
Intake and Dermally Absorbed Dose Equations/ Model Name
(Current/Future)
t
Inhalation of Groundwater
Vapors in Indoor Air
(Vapor Intrusion)
ATnc,a
Averaging Time, noncarcinogens- adult
7300
days
USEPA, 1989 (ED x 365 days/year)
Exposure concentration (ngftn3) for carcinogens (lifetime) =
[EC for carcinogens (adult) + EC for carcinogens (child)]
CF1
Conversion Factor 1
24
hours/day
Inhalation
On-Site Resident
(Current/Future)
Child
Inhalation of Groundwater
Vapors in Indoor Air
(Vapor Intrusion)
Non-Mutagenic Constituents
Exposure concentration (jjg/m3) for carcinogens (child) =
CA x ET xEFx FH-GW x EDc
EC
Exposure concentration
Calculated
|jg/m3
See equations
CA
Exposure Point Concentration, indoor air
Modeled
|jg/m3
Calculated (See Attachment A4)
ET
Exposure Time
24
hours/day
USEPA,2014
ATcx CF1
Exposure concentration (jjg/m3) for non-carcinogens (child) =
CA x ET xEFx FH-GW x EDc
EF
Exposure Frequency
350
days/year
USEPA, 2014(USEPA, 1991; pg 15)
FH-GW
Fraction Inhaled from Source, groundwater
1
unitless
USEPA, 1989 (Default of 1 (100°/Q is assumed)
EDc
Exposure Duration, child
6
years
USEPA, 2014(USEPA, 1991; pp6and 15)
ATc
Averaging Time, carcinogens
25550
days
USEPA, 1989 (ED (70 years) x 365 days/year)
ATnc,c x CF1
Exposure concentration (ngftn3) for carcinogens (lifetime) =
[EC for carcinogens (adult) + EC for carcinogens (child)]
ATnc,c
Averaging Time, noncarcinogens - child
2190
days
USEPA, 1989 (ED x 365 days/year)
CF1
Conversion Factor 1
24
hours/day
Inhalation
On-Site Resident
(Current/Future)
Lifetime
Inhalation of Groundwater
Vapors in Indoor Air
(Vapor Intrusion)
Mutagenic Constituents
Exposure concentration (ngftn3) for mutagenic carcinogens (lifetime) =
EC
Exposure concentration
Calculated
|jg/m3
See equations
CA
Exposure Point Concentration, indoor air
Modeled
|jg/m3
Calculated (See Attachment A4)
EF
Exposure Frequency
350
days/year
USEPA, 2014(USEPA, 1991; pg 15)
ET
Exposure Time
24
hours/day
USEPA,2014
ATcxCF1 " [yEDg_igX ADAFg_1g+ED1g_26>
-------
Table A4-3
Dermal Worksheet for Groundwater (Potable Use)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Groundwater Chemical of Potential
Concern
CASRN
Source: USEPA, 2004, RAGS Part E Dermal Guidance
On-Site Hypothetical Resident (Child) - Groundwater
(Potable Use)
On-Site Hypothetical Resident (Adult) - Groundwater
(Potable Use)
On-Site Hypothetical Resident (Lifetime) - Groundwater
(Potable Use)
t-event
(hrs/event):
0.54
Selected DA-event
t-event
(hrs/event):
0.71
Selected DA-event
t-event
(hrs/event):
0.67
Selected DA-event
FA
unitless
Kp
cm/hr
Tau-event
hrs/event
B
Value
T*
hr
DA-Event 1
(L/cm'-event)
DA-Event 2
(L/cm'-event)
Equation
DA-event
(L/cm'-event)
DA-Event 1
(L/cm'-event)
DA-Event 2
(L/cm'-event)
Equation
DA-event
(L/cm'-event)
DA-Event 1
(L/cm'-event)
DA-Event 2
(L/cm'-event)
Equation
DA-event
(L/cm'-event)
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
67-66-3
1
6.83E-03
4.90E-01
2.87E-02
1.18E+00
9.71E-06
1.05E-05
DA-Event 1
9.71 E-06
1.11E-05
1.16E-05
DA-Event 1
1.11E-05
1.08E-05
1.13E-05
DA-Event 1
1.08E-05
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
335-67-1
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
1763-23-1
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Cyanide
Cyanide
57-12-5
1
1.00E-03
1.47E-01
1.96E-03
3.53E-01
7.79E-07
8.34E-07
DA-Event 2
8.34E-07
8.93E-07
1.00E-06
DA-Event 2
1.00E-06
8.68E-07
9.64E-07
DA-Event 2
9.64E-07
Metals (Total)
Arsenic
7440-38-2
1
1.00E-03
2.76E-01
3.33E-03
6.63E-01
5.40E-07
-
DA-Event 1
5.40E-07
7.10E-07
-
DA-Event 1
7.10E-07
6.71 E-07
-
DA-Event 1
6.71 E-07
Barium
7440-39-3
1
1.00E-03
6.18E-01
4.51 E-03
1.48E+00
5.40E-07
-
DA-Event 1
5.40E-07
7.10E-07
-
DA-Event 1
7.10E-07
6.71 E-07
-
DA-Event 1
6.71 E-07
Beryllium
7440-41-7
1
1.00E-03
1.18E-01
1.15E-03
2.83E-01
5.40E-07
-
DA-Event 1
5.40E-07
7.10E-07
-
DA-Event 1
7.10E-07
6.71 E-07
-
DA-Event 1
6.71 E-07
Cadmium (Water)
7440-43-9W
1
1.00E-03
4.48E-01
4.08E-03
1.08E+00
5.40E-07
-
DA-Event 1
5.40E-07
7.10E-07
-
DA-Event 1
7.10E-07
6.71 E-07
-
DA-Event 1
6.71 E-07
Chromium, Hexavalent
18540-29-9
1
2.00E-03
2.06E-01
5.55E-03
4.93E-01
1.08E-06
-
DA-Event 1
1.08E-06
1.42E-06
-
DA-Event 1
1.42E-06
1.34E-06
-
DA-Event 1
1.34E-06
Cobalt
7440-48-4
1
4.00E-04
2.25E-01
1.18E-03
5.40E-01
2.16E-07
-
DA-Event 1
2.16E-07
2.84E-07
-
DA-Event 1
2.84E-07
2.68E-07
-
DA-Event 1
2.68E-07
Copper
7440-50-8
1
1.00E-03
2.39E-01
3.07E-03
5.73E-01
5.40E-07
-
DA-Event 1
5.40E-07
7.10E-07
-
DA-Event 1
7.10E-07
6.71 E-07
-
DA-Event 1
6.71 E-07
Iron
7439-89-6
1
1.00E-03
2.16E-01
2.87E-03
5.19E-01
5.40E-07
-
DA-Event 1
5.40E-07
7.10E-07
-
DA-Event 1
7.10E-07
6.71 E-07
-
DA-Event 1
6.71 E-07
Manganese
7439-96-5
1
1.00E-03
2.14E-01
2.85E-03
5.13E-01
5.40E-07
-
DA-Event 1
5.40E-07
7.10E-07
-
DA-Event 1
7.10E-07
6.71 E-07
-
DA-Event 1
6.71 E-07
Nickel
7440-02-0
1
2.00E-04
2.24E-01
5.89E-04
5.38E-01
1.08E-07
-
DA-Event 1
1.08E-07
1.42E-07
-
DA-Event 1
1.42E-07
1.34E-07
-
DA-Event 1
1.34E-07
Parameters:
B = Dimensionless Ratio of the Permeability Coefficient of a Compound Through the
Stratum Corneum Relative to its Permeability Coefficient Across the Viable Epidermis
CF3 = Conversion Factor 3, 0.001 L/cm3
FA = Fraction Absorbed Water
Kp = Dermal Permeability Coefficient of
Compound in Water
T* = Time to Reach Steady-State
t-event = Event Duration (scenario-specific)
Tau-event = Lag Time per Event
DABS = Dermal Absorption Factor
References:
USEPA, 2004. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund, Volume 1, Human Health Evaluation Manual,
Part E, Supplemental Guidance for Dermal Risk Assessment, Final, July, EPA/540/R/99/005.
For Organic Compounds:
If t-event < T*, then: DA-event 1:
2 x FA x Kp x CF 3 x
6 X Tevent % tevent
If t-event > T* then: DA-event 2 =
tevent
FA x CF 3 x Kp x
1 + B
(2 X Tevent) ^
/I + 3 B + 3B2\
V (1 + fi)2 J
For Inorganic Compounds:
DA-event 1 = KP x CF3 x t-event
No DA-event 2 equation for inorganics.
-------
Table A4-4
Modeled Groundwater-to-Vapor Concentrations while Showering
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Groundwater Volatile COPC (Potable Use)
CASRN
MW
(g/mol)
H
(atm-m3/mol)
ki
(cm/hr)
kg
(cm/hr)
Kl
(cm/hr)
K„l
(cm/hr)
C,.,111
(ug/L)
C,d
(ug/L)
S
(uq/m3-min)
c„
(uq/m3)
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
67-66-3
1.19E+02
3.67E-03
1.21E+01
1.16E+03
1.14E+01
1.54E+01
1.00E+00
4.01E-01
1.34E+O0
8.01E-02
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
335-67-1
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
1763-23-1
Cyanide
Cyanide
57-12-5
2.60E+O1
1.01E-04
2.60E+O1
2.50E+O3
7.47E+O0
1.01E+01
1.00E+00
2.86E-01
9.53E-01
5.72E-02
Metals (Total)
Arsenic
7440-38-2
Barium
7440-39-3
Beryllium
7440-41-7
Cadmium (Water)
7440-43-9W
Chromium, Hexavalent
18540-29-9
Cobalt
7440-48-4
Copper
7440-50-8
Iron
7439-89-6
Manganese
7439-96-5
Nickel
7440-02-0
Notes:
(1) A value of 1 ug/L is used to calculate a shower concentration for all possible chemical of potential concerns (COPCs). The Site/COPC-specific groundwater exposure point concentration (EPC) will be multiplied by the generic air concentration value
to model shower air.
-- = Not Evaluated; only volatile chemicals evaluated; CASRN = Chemical Abstract Services Registry Number
Equations used for Foster-Chrostowski (1987) model
1) Derivation of Liauid-Film Mass Transfer Coefficient for the Shower Model
5) Derivation of Concentration Leaving Shower Droplet Shower Model
Values
calc
20
44
chem-specific
MW
20*(44/MW)Ub
Liquid-film mass transfer coefficient (cm/hour)
Liquid-film mass transfer coefficient for carbon dioxide (cm/hour)
Conversion factor (molecular weight of carbon dioxide)
Molecular Weight
2) Derivation of Gas-Film Mass Transfer Coefficient for the Shower Model
Values
calc
3000
18
chem-specific
kg= 3000* (18 /MW)ub
kg Gas-film mass transfer coefficient (cm/hour)
Gas-film mass transfer coefficient for water (cm/hour)
Conversion factor (molecular weight of water)
MW Molecular Weight
Values
calc
chem-specific
calc
2
60
1
Cwd = Cq * (1 - exp [ (-KaL * ts) / (60 * d) ])
C^j Concentration leaving shower droplet after time ts (|jg/L)
Cq Initial concentration in tap water (pg/L)
KaL Adjusted overall mass transfer coefficient (cm/hour)
ts Shower droplet drop ti me (sec)
Interficial area for droplet multiplied by conversion factors
d Shower droplet diameter (mm)
6) Derivation of VOC in Air Generation Rate Shower Model
S= (Cwd * FR) / SV
Values
calc S VOC in air generation rate (pg/m3-min)
calc C^ Concentration leaving shower droplet after time ts(|jg/L)
-------
Table A4-5
Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic (IEUBK) Model Results
Lead in Groundwater, Child Resident
Residential Well 0155 Tapwater Results
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Lead Site-Specific Information for the Child Resident Scenario
Well ID
Medium
EPC Value
Units
0155
Groundwater
23
ljg/L
IEUBK Model Parameters
Value
Units
Indoor air lead concentration (% of outdoor)
30 [a]
%
AIR (by year)
Air Concentration
Age (years) =0-7
0.10 [a]
ug/m3
Time Outdoors
Age (months) = 6-12
1 [a]
hours
12-24
2 [a]
hours
24-36
3 [a]
hours
36-48
4 [a]
hours
48-60
4 [a]
hours
60-72
4 [a]
hours
72-84
4 [a]
hours
Ventilation Rate
Age (months) = 6-12
3.216 [a]
m3/day
12-24
4.970 [a]
m3/day
24-36
6.086 [a]
m3/day
36-48
6.954 [a]
m3/day
48-60
7.682 [a]
m3/day
60-72
8.318 [a]
m3/day
72-84
8.887 [a]
m3/day
Lung Absorption
32 [a]
%
-------
Table A4-5
Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic (IEUBK) Model Results
Lead in Groundwater, Child Resident
Residential Well 0155 Tapwater Results
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
DIET (by year)
Dietary Lead Intake
Age (months) = 6-12
2.26 [a]
|jg/day
12-24
5.03 [a]
|jg/day
24-36
5.21 [a]
|jg/day
36-48
5.38 [a]
|jg/day
48-60
5.64 [a]
|jg/day
60-72
6.04 [a]
|jg/day
72-84
5.95 [a]
|jg/day
ALTERNATE DIET SOURCES (by food class)
Used Alternate Diet Sources?
No
(Yes/No)
DRINKING WATER
Lead Concentration in drinking water
23
|jg Pb/L
Ingestion rate:
Age (months) = 6-12
0.40 [a]
L/day
12-24
0.43 [a]
L/day
24-36
0.51 [a]
L/day
36-48
0.54 [a]
L/day
48-60
0.57 [a]
L/day
60-72
0.60 [a]
L/day
72-84
0.63 [a]
L/day
-------
Table A4-5
Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic (IEUBK) Model Results
Lead in Groundwater, Child Resident
Residential Well 0155 Tapwater Results
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
SOIL/DUST INGESTION
Soil ingestion:
Age (months) =
6-12
200
[a]
|jg Pb/g
12-24
200
[a]
|jg Pb/g
24-36
200
[a]
|jg Pb/g
36-48
200
[a]
|jg Pb/g
48-60
200
[a]
|jg Pb/g
60-72
200
[a]
|jg Pb/g
72-84
200
[a]
|jg Pb/g
Household dust:
Age (months) =
6-12
150
[a]
|jg Pb/g
12-24
150
[a]
|jg Pb/g
24-36
150
[a]
|jg Pb/g
36-48
150
[a]
|jg Pb/g
48-60
150
[a]
|jg Pb/g
60-72
150
[a]
|jg Pb/g
72-84
150
[a]
|jg Pb/g
SOIL/DUST MULTIPLE SOURCE ANALYSIS
Average multiple source concentration
150.00 [a]
MQ/g
Mass fraction of outdoor soil to indoor dust conversion facto
0.70 [a]
unitless
Outdoor airborne lead to indoor household dust
1 nn Tai
jjg Pb/g dust
concentration
per |jg Pb/m3 air
ALTERNATE INDOOR DUST Pb SOURCES
Used Indoor Dust Pb Sources?
No
(Yes/No)
-------
Table A4-5
Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic (IEUBK) Model Results
Lead in Groundwater, Child Resident
Residential Well 0155 Tapwater Results
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
BIOAVAILABILITY FOR GUT ABSORPTION PATHWAYS
Total lead absorption (at low intake): Total Soil
soil 30 [a]
dust 30 [a]
water 50 [a]
diet 50 [a]
alternate source 0 [a]
%
%
%
%
%
BIOAVAILABILITY FOR GUT ABSORPTION PATHWAYS (continued)
Fraction of total net absorption at low intake rate that is
attributable to non-saturable (passive) processes
unitless
MATERNAL-TO-NEWBORN LEAD EXPOSURE
Mothers blood lead concentration at childbirth 0.6 [a]
|jg/dL
PLOTTING AND RISK ESTIMATION
Geometric standard deviation (GSD) for blood lead 1.6 [a]
Blood lead level (BLL) of concern 5 [a]
unitless
|jg/dL
COMPUTATION OPTIONS
Iteration time step for numerical integration 4 [a]
hours
PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTION PERCENT RESULTS
Geometric mean 4.1 Calc
Age Range 12-72 [a]
Percent above allowable BLL 34 Calc
unitless
months
%
Notes:
[1] Young child = 0-7 years of age (12-72 months) (EPA 2021b).
[a] IEUBK model default value (EPA 2021 a and 2021 b).
L/day = liters per day |jg/dL = micrograms per deciliter
-------
Table A4-5
Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic (IEUBK) Model Results
Lead in Groundwater, Child Resident
Residential Well 0155 Tapwater Results
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Pb = lead
jjg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter
|jg/L = micrograms per liter
|jg/g = micrograms per gram
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
References:
EPA 2021a. Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic Model for Lead in Children, Windows® version
(IEUBKwinv2 build 1.66) Dated May 2021.
EPA 2021b. User's Guide for the Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic Model for Lead in Children (IEUBK)
Windows® version 2 (Updated May 2021). The Technical Review Workgroup (TRW) Lead Committee.
-------
Prob. Density (Blood Pb]
Blood Pb Cone (|lg/dL)
Cutoff = 5.000 |lg/dl Age Range = 12 to 72 months
Geo Mean = 4.100
GSD = 1.600 Run Mode = Research
% Above = 33.647 Comment = 0155- 23 ug/L
% Below = 66.353
These IEUBK Model results are valid as long as they were produced with an official, unmodified version of the IEUBK Model with a software certificate.
While IEUBK Model output is generally written with three digits to the right of the decimal point, the true precision of the output is strongly influenced by least precise input values.
-------
Table A4-6
Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic (IEUBK) Model Results
Lead in Groundwater, Child Resident
Residential Well 0176 Tapwater Results
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Lead Site-Specific Information for the Child Resident Scenario
Well ID
Medium
EPC Value
Units
0176
Groundwater
15
ljg/L
IEUBK Model Parameters
Value
Units
Indoor air lead concentration (% of outdoor)
30 [a]
%
AIR (by year)
Air Concentration
Age (years) =0-7
0.10 [a]
ug/m3
Time Outdoors
Age (months) = 6-12
1 [a]
hours
12-24
2 [a]
hours
24-36
3 [a]
hours
36-48
4 [a]
hours
48-60
4 [a]
hours
60-72
4 [a]
hours
72-84
4 [a]
hours
Ventilation Rate
Age (months) = 6-12
3.216 [a]
m3/day
12-24
4.97 [a]
m3/day
24-36
6.086 [a]
m3/day
36-48
6.954 [a]
m3/day
48-60
7.682 [a]
m3/day
60-72
8.318 [a]
m3/day
72-84
8.887 [a]
m3/day
Lung Absorption
32 [a]
%
-------
Table A4-6
Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic (IEUBK) Model Results
Lead in Groundwater, Child Resident
Residential Well 0176 Tapwater Results
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
DIET (by year)
Dietary Lead Intake
Age (months) = 6-12
2.26 [a]
|jg/day
12-24
5.03 [a]
|jg/day
24-36
5.21 [a]
|jg/day
36-48
5.38 [a]
|jg/day
48-60
5.64 [a]
|jg/day
60-72
6.04 [a]
|jg/day
72-84
5.95 [a]
|jg/day
ALTERNATE DIET SOURCES (by food class)
Used Alternate Diet Sources?
No
(Yes/No)
DRINKING WATER
Lead Concentration in drinking water
15
|jg Pb/L
Ingestion rate:
Age (months) = 6-12
0.40 [a]
L/day
12-24
0.43 [a]
L/day
24-36
0.51 [a]
L/day
36-48
0.54 [a]
L/day
48-60
0.57 [a]
L/day
60-72
0.60 [a]
L/day
72-84
0.63 [a]
L/day
-------
Table A4-6
Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic (IEUBK) Model Results
Lead in Groundwater, Child Resident
Residential Well 0176 Tapwater Results
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
SOIL/DUST INGESTION
Soil ingestion:
Age (months) =
6-12
200
[a]
|jg Pb/g
12-24
200
[a]
|jg Pb/g
24-36
200
[a]
|jg Pb/g
36-48
200
[a]
|jg Pb/g
48-60
200
[a]
|jg Pb/g
60-72
200
[a]
|jg Pb/g
72-84
200
[a]
|jg Pb/g
Household dust:
Age (months) =
6-12
150
[a]
|jg Pb/g
12-24
150
[a]
|jg Pb/g
24-36
150
[a]
|jg Pb/g
36-48
150
[a]
|jg Pb/g
48-60
150
[a]
|jg Pb/g
60-72
150
[a]
|jg Pb/g
72-84
150
[a]
|jg Pb/g
SOIL/DUST MULTIPLE SOURCE ANALYSIS
Average multiple source concentration
150.00 [a]
MQ/g
Mass fraction of outdoor soil to indoor dust conversion facto
0.70 [a]
unitless
Outdoor airborne lead to indoor household dust
1 nn Tai
jjg Pb/g dust
concentration
per |jg Pb/m3 air
ALTERNATE INDOOR DUST Pb SOURCES
Used Indoor Dust Pb Sources?
No
(Yes/No)
-------
Table A4-6
Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic (IEUBK) Model Results
Lead in Groundwater, Child Resident
Residential Well 0176 Tapwater Results
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
BIOAVAILABILITY FOR GUT ABSORPTION PATHWAYS
Total lead absorption (at low intake): Total Soil
soil 30 [a]
dust 30 [a]
water 50 [a]
diet 50 [a]
alternate source 0 [a]
%
%
%
%
%
BIOAVAILABILITY FOR GUT ABSORPTION PATHWAYS (continued)
Fraction of total net absorption at low intake rate that is
attributable to non-saturable (passive) processes
unitless
MATERNAL-TO-NEWBORN LEAD EXPOSURE
Mothers blood lead concentration at childbirth 0.6 [a]
|jg/dL
PLOTTING AND RISK ESTIMATION
Geometric standard deviation (GSD) for blood lead 1.6 [a]
Blood lead level (BLL) of concern 5 [a]
unitless
|jg/dL
COMPUTATION OPTIONS
Iteration time step for numerical integration 4 [a]
hours
PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTION PERCENT RESULTS
Geometric mean 3.466 Calc
Age Range 12-72 [a]
Percent above allowable BLL 22 Calc
unitless
months
%
Notes:
[1] Young child = 0-7 years of age (12-72 months) (EPA 2021b).
[a] IEUBK model default value (EPA 2021 a and 2021 b).
L/day = liters per day |jg/dL = micrograms per deciliter
-------
Table A4-6
Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic (IEUBK) Model Results
Lead in Groundwater, Child Resident
Residential Well 0176 Tapwater Results
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Pb = lead
jjg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter
|jg/L = micrograms per liter
|jg/g = micrograms per gram
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
References:
EPA 2021a. Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic Model for Lead in Children, Windows® version
(IEUBKwinv2 build 1.66) Dated May 2021.
EPA 2021b. User's Guide for the Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic Model for Lead in Children (IEUBK)
Windows® version 2 (Updated May 2021). The Technical Review Workgroup (TRW) Lead Committee.
-------
Prob. Density (Blood Pb]
Blood Pb Cone (|lg/dL]
Cutoff = 5.000 Jlg/dl Age Range = 12 to 72 months
Geo Mean = 3.466
GSD = 1.600 Run Mode = Research
% Above = 21.707 Comment = 0176-15 ug/L
% Below = 78.213
These IEUBK Model results are valid as long as they were produced with an official, unmodified version of the IEUBK Model with a software certificate.
While IEUBK Model output is generally written with three digits to the right of the decimal point the true precision of the output is strongly influenced by least precise input values.
-------
Table A4-7
Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic (IEUBK) Model Results
Lead in Groundwater, Child Resident
Residential Well 0212 Tapwater Results
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Lead Site-Specific Information for the Child Resident Scenario
Well ID
Medium
EPC Value
Units
0212
Groundwater
16
|jg/L
IEUBK Model Parameter'
Value
Units
A'R (by year)
Air Concentration
Age (years) =0-7
0.10 [a]
ua/m3
Time Outdoors
Age (months) =6-12
1 [a]
hours
12-24
2 [a]
hours
24-36
3 [a]
hours
36-48
4 [a]
hours
48-60
4 [a]
hours
60-72
4 [a]
hours
72-84
4 [a]
hours
Ventilation Rate
Age (months) =6-12
3.216 [a]
m3/day
12-24
4.97 [a]
m3/day
24-36
6.086 [a]
m3/day
36-48
6.954 [a]
m3/day
48-60
7.682 [a]
m3/day
60-72
8.318 [a]
m3/day
72-84
8.887 [a]
m3/dav
Lung Absorption
32 [a]
%
-------
Table A4-7
Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic (IEUBK) Model Results
Lead in Groundwater, Child Resident
Residential Well 0212 Tapwater Results
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
DIET (by year)
/ Lead Intake
Age (months) =6-12
2.26 [a]
jjg/day
12-24
5.03 [a]
jjg/day
24-36
5.21 [a]
jjg/day
36-48
5.38 [a]
jjg/day
48-60
5.64 [a]
jjg/day
60-72
6.04 [a]
jjg/day
72-84
5.95 [a]
jjg/day
ALTERNATE DIET SOURCES (byfo
3d class)
No
(Yes/No)
DRINKING WATER
Lead Concentration in drinking water
16
jjg Pb/L
Ingestion rate:
Age (months) =6-12
0.40 [a]
L/day
12-24
0.43 [a]
L/day
24-36
0.51 [a]
L/day
36-48
0.54 [a]
L/day
48-60
0.57 [a]
L/day
60-72
0.60 [a]
L/day
72-84
0.63 [a]
L/day
-------
Table A4-7
Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic (IEUBK) Model Results
Lead in Groundwater, Child Resident
Residential Well 0212 Tapwater Results
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
SOIL/DUST INGESTION
gestion:
Age (months) =6-12
200 [a]
|jg Pb/g
12-24
200 [a]
|jg Pb/g
24-36
200 [a]
|jg Pb/g
36-48
200 [a]
|jg Pb/g
48-60
200 [a]
|jg Pb/g
60-72
200 [a]
|jg Pb/g
72-84
200 [a]
|jg Pb/g
Household dust:
Age (months) =6-12
150 [a]
|jg Pb/g
12-24
150 [a]
|jg Pb/g
24-36
150 [a]
|jg Pb/g
36-48
150 [a]
|jg Pb/g
48-60
150 [a]
|jg Pb/g
60-72
150 [a]
|jg Pb/g
72-84
150 [a]
|jg Pb/g
SOIL/DUST MULTIPLE SOURCE ANALYSIS
Average multiple source concentration
150.00 [a]
Mg/g
Mass fraction of outdoor soil to indoor dust conversion factor
0.70 [a]
unitless
Outdoor airborne lead to indoor household dust concentration
100 [a]
|jg Pb/g dust
per uq Pb/m3air
ALTERNATE INDOOR DUST Pb SC
)URCES
Used Indoor Dust Pb Sources?
No
(Yes/No)
-------
Table A4-7
Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic (IEUBK) Model Results
Lead in Groundwater, Child Resident
Residential Well 0212 Tapwater Results
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
BIOAVAILABILITY FOR GUT ABSORPTION PATHWAYS
sad absorption (at low intake): Total Soil
soil 30 [a]
%
dust 30 [a]
%
water 50 [a]
%
diet 50 [a]
%
alternate source 0 [a]
%
BIOAVAILABILITY FOR GUT ABSORPTION PATHWAYS (continued)
Fraction of total net absorption at low intake rate that is . .
attributable to non-saturable (passive) processes
MATERNAL-TO-NEWBORN LEAD EXPOSURE
Mothers blood lead concentration at childbirth 0.6 [a]
PLOTTING AND RISK ESTIMATION
Geometric standard deviation (GSD) for blood lead 1.6 [a]
Blood lead level (BLL) of concern 5 [a]
COMPUTATION OPTIONS
Iteration time step for numerical integration 4 [a]
PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTION PERCENT RESULTS
Geometric mean 3.547 Calc
unities:
Age Range 12-72 [a]
months
Percent above allowable BLL 23 Calc
%
Notes:
[1 ] Young child = 0-7 years of age (12 - 72 months) (EPA 2021b).
[a] IEUBK model default value (EPA 2021a and 2021b).
L/day = liters per day
|jg/dl_ = micrograms per deciliter
-------
Table A4-7
Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic (IEUBK) Model Results
Lead in Groundwater, Child Resident
Residential Well 0212 Tapwater Results
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Pb = lead
|jg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter
jjg/L = micrograms per liter
References:
|jg/g = micrograms per gram
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram
EPA 2021a. Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic Model for Lead in Children, Windows® version
(IEUBKwinv2 build 1.66) Dated May 2021.
EPA 2021b. User's Guide for the Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic Model for Lead in Children (IEUBK)
Windows® version 2 (Updated May 2021). The Technical Review Workgroup (TRW) Lead Committee.
-------
Prob. Density (Blood Pb]
Blood Pb Cone [|ig/dL]
Cutoff = 5.000 |lg/dl Age Range = 12 to 72 months
Geo Mean = 3.517
GSD = 1.600 Run Mode = Research
% Above = 23.246 Comment = 0212-16 ug/L
% Below = 76.754
These IEUBK Model results are valid as long as they were produced with an official, unmodified version of the IEUBK Model with a software certificate.
While IEUBK Model output is generally written with three digits to the right of the decimal point the true precision of the output is strongly influenced by least precise input values.
-------
5
Human Health Carcinogenic Risk and Non-Carcinogenic
Hazard Calculations
-------
Table A5-1
Non-Cancer Toxicity Data - Oral/Dermal
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Constituent of Inteiest
Cluonic/
Subchionic
Oial RfD
Oial Absoiption
Effiencyfoi Deimal 'h
Absoibed RfD foi Deimal,?l
Piimaiy Taiget
Oigan/Systemls)
Combined Uncertainty/
Modifying Factois
RfD: Taiget Oigan(s)
Value
Units
Value
Units
Souice(s)
Date(s)'1'
(MM/DD/YYYY)
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
Chronic
0.01
mg/kg-day
1
0.01
mg/kg-day
HP
100
IRIS
3/18/2022
Chloroform
Subchronic
0.1
mg/kg-day
1
0.1
mg/kg-day
HP
100
ATSDR
2/1/2022
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
Chronic
0.000003
mg/kg-day
1
3.00E-06
mg/kg-day
DV
300
ATSDR
6/9/2022
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
Subchronic
0.000003
mg/kg-day
1
3.00E-06
mg/kg-day
DV
300
ATSDR
6/9/2022
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
Chronic
0.000002
mg/kg-day
1
2.00E-06
mg/kg-day
DV
30
ATSDR
6/8/2022
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
Subchronic
0.000002
mg/kg-day
1
2.00E-06
mg/kg-day
DV
30
ATSDR
6/8/2022
Cyanide
Cyanide
Chronic
0.0006
mg/kg-day
1
0.0006
mg/kg-day
RP
3000
IRIS
4/7/2022
Cyanide
Subchronic
0.02
mg/kg-day
1
0.02
mg/kg-day
OT; EN; NV
500
HEAST
7/31/1997
Metals (Total)
Arsenic
Chronic
0.0003
mg/kg-day
1
0.0003
mg/kg-day
DM; HM
3
IRIS
4/7/2022
Arsenic
Subchronic
0.005
mg/kg-day
1
0.005
mg/kg-day
DM
10
IRIS
4/7/2022
Barium
Chronic
0.2
mg/kg-day
0.07
0.014
mg/kg-day
NV
300
IRIS
4/7/2022
Barium
Subchronic
0.2
mg/kg-day
0.07
0.014
mg/kg-day
UR
10
ATSDR
2/1/2022
Beryllium
Chronic
0.002
mg/kg-day
0.007
0.000014
mg/kg-day
Gl
300
IRIS
4/7/2022
Beryllium
Subchronic
0.005
mg/kg-day
0.007
0.000035
mg/kg-day
-
100
HEAST
7/31/1997
Cadmium (Water)
Chronic
0.0001
mg/kg-day
0.05
0.000005
mg/kg-day
UR
3
ATSDR
2/1/2022
Cadmium (Water)
Subchronic
0.0005
mg/kg-day
0.05
0.000025
mg/kg-day
MS
100
ATSDR
2/1/2022
Chromium, Hexavalent
Chronic
0.003
mg/kg-day
0.025
0.000075
mg/kg-day
-
900
IRIS
4/7/2022
Chromium, Hexavalent
Subchronic
0.005
mg/kg-day
0.025
0.000125
mg/kg-day
HM
100
ATSDR
2/1/2022
Cobalt
Chronic
0.0003
mg/kg-day
1
0.0003
mg/kg-day
EN
3000
PPRTV
4/7/2022
Cobalt
Subchronic
0.003
mg/kg-day
1
0.003
mg/kg-day
EN
300
PPRTV
4/7/2022
Copper
Chronic
0.04
mg/kg-day
1
0.04
mg/kg-day
Gl
-
HEAST
7/31/1997
Copper
Subchronic
0.01
mg/kg-day
1
0.01
mg/kg-day
Gl
3
ATSDR
2/1/2022
Iron
Chronic
0.7
mg/kg-day
1
0.7
mg/kg-day
Gl
1.5
PPRTV
4/7/2022
Iron
Subchronic
0.7
mg/kg-day
1
0.7
mg/kg-day
Gl
1.5
PPRTV
4/7/2022
Manganese
Chronic
0.024
mg/kg-day
0.04
0.00096
mg/kg-day
NV
3
-
4/7/2022
Manganese
Subchronic
-
mg/kg-day
0.04
-
mg/kg-day
-
-
-
4/7/2022
Nickel
Chronic
0.02
mg/kg-day
0.04
0.0008
mg/kg-day
OT
300
IRIS
4/7/2022
Nickel
Subchronic
0.02
mg/kg-day
0.04
0.0008
mg/kg-day
OT
300
HEAST
7/31/1997
Notes:
- = No Value; mg/kg-day = milligrams per kilogram -day; RfD = Reference Dose
(1) Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) July 2004. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. Volume 1: Human
Health Evaluation Manual (Part E, Supplemental Guidance for Dermal Risk Assessment) Final. Office of Emergency and Remedial
Response. Washington D.C. EPA/540/R/99/005.
(2) To derive the Absorbed RfD for Dermal, the oral RfD is multiplied by the oral absorption efficiency.
RfD: Target Organ Source Information:
ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substance & Disease Registry (https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov)
HEAST = Health Effects Assessment Summary Table (https://www.epa-heast.ornl.gov/)
IRIS = Integrated Risk Information System (https://www.epa.gov/iris)
PPRTV = Provisional Peer-Reviewed Toxicity Values (https://www.hhpprtv.ornl.gov/)
-------
Table A5-1
Non-Cancer Toxicity Data - Oral/Dermal
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Cluonic/
Subchionic
Oial RfD
Oial Absoiption
Effiencyfoi Deimal 'h
Absoibed RfD foi Deimal,?l
Piimaiy Taiget
Oigan/Systemls)
Combined Uncertainty/
Modifying Factois
RfD: Taiget Oigan(s)
Constituent of Interest
Value
Units
Value
Units
Souice(s)
Date(s)'1'
(MM/DD/YYYY)
Taiget Oigan Codes:
DM = Dermal HP = Hepatic OT = Other
DV = Developmental IM = Immune RP = Reproductive
EN = Endocrine MS = Musculoskeletal UR = Urinary
Gl = Gastrointestinal NV = Nervous
-------
Table A5-2
Non-Cancer Toxicity Data - Inhalation
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Constituent of Inteiest
Cluonic/
Subchionic
Inhalation RfC
Piimaiy Taiget
Oigan/Systemls)
Combined Uncertainty/
Modifying Factois
RfC: Taiget Oigan(s)
Value
Units
Souice(s)
Date(s)
(MM/DD/YYYY)
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
Chronic
0.097652352
mg/nf
HP
100
ATSDR
2/1/2022
Chloroform
Subchronic
0.244130879
mg/nf
HP
100
ATSDR
2/1/2022
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
Chronic
-
-
-
-
-
6/9/2022
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
Subchronic
-
-
-
-
-
6/9/2022
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
Chronic
-
-
-
-
-
6/8/2022
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
Subchronic
-
-
-
-
-
6/8/2022
Cyanide
Cyanide
Chronic
0.0008
mg/nf
EN
3000
-
4/7/2022
Cyanide
Subchronic
-
-
-
-
-
4/7/2022
Metals (Total)
Arsenic
Chronic
0.000015
mg/nf
-
-
Cal EPA
4/7/2022
Arsenic
Subchronic
-
mg/nf
-
-
-
4/7/2022
Barium
Chronic
0.0005
mg/nf
DV
1000
HEAST
7/31/1997
Barium
Subchronic
0.005
mg/nf
DV
100
HEAST
7/31/1997
Beryllium
Chronic
0.00002
mg/nf
IM; RS
10
IRIS
4/7/2022
Beryllium
Subchronic
-
mg/nf
-
-
-
4/7/2022
Cadmium (Water)
Chronic
0.00001
mg/nf
UR
3
ATSDR
2/1/2022
Cadmium (Water)
Subchronic
-
mg/nf
-
-
-
4/7/2022
Chromium, Hexavalent
Chronic
0.0001
mg/nf
RS
300
IRIS
4/7/2022
Chromium, Hexavalent
Subchronic
0.0003
mg/nf
RS
30
ATSDR
2/1/2022
Cobalt
Chronic
0.000006
mg/nf
RS
300
PPRTV
4/7/2022
Cobalt
Subchronic
0.00002
mg/nf
RS
100
PPRTV
4/7/2022
Copper
Chronic
-
-
-
-
-
4/7/2022
Copper
Subchronic
-
-
-
-
-
4/7/2022
Iron
Chronic
-
-
-
-
-
4/7/2022
Iron
Subchronic
-
-
-
-
-
4/7/2022
Manganese
Chronic
0.00005
mg/nf
NV
1000
IRIS
4/7/2022
Manganese
Subchronic
-
mg/nf
-
-
-
4/7/2022
Nickel
Chronic
0.00009
mg/nf
RS
30
ATSDR
2/1/2022
Nickel
Subchronic
0.0002
mg/nf
RS
30
ATSDR
2/1/2022
Notes:
--= No Value
N/A = Not Available
RfC = Reference Concentration
Mg/nf = micrograms per cubic meter
(1) With the exception of HEAST, source date represents when toxicity data were researched in on-line databases.
Target Organ Source Information:
ATSDR = Agency for Toxic Substance & Disease Registry (https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov)
Cal EPA = California Environmental Protection Agency (https://calepa.ca.gov/)
HEAST = Health Effects Assessment Summary Table (https://www.epa-heast.ornl.gov/)
IRIS = Integrated Risk Information System (https://www.epa.gov/iris)
PPRTV = Provisional Peer-Reviewed Toxicity Values (https://www.hhpprtv.ornl.gov/)
-------
Table A5-2
Non-Cancer Toxicity Data - Inhalation
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Cluonic/
Subchionic
Inhalation RfC
Piimaiy Taiget
Oigan/Systemls)
Combined Uncertainty/
Modifying Factois
RfC: Taiget Oigan(s)
Constituent of Inteiest
Value
Units
Souice(s)
Date(s)
(MM/DD/YYYY)
Target Organ Codes:
CV = Cardiovascular IM = Immune RS = Respiratory
DM = Dermal NV = Nervous UR = Urinary
DV = Developmental OC = Ocular
HM = Hematological OT = Other
HP = Hepatic RP = Reproductive
-------
Table A6-1
Cancer Toxicity Data - Oral/Dermal
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Constituent of Interest
Oral Cancer Slope Factor
Oral Absorption
Absorbed Cancer Slope
Factor for Dermal""
Weight of Evidence/ Cancer Guideline
Cancer Slope Factor
Value
Units
Effiency for Dermal 'h
Value
Units
Description
Source(s)
Date! si'"
(MM/DD/YYYYl
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
0.031
kg-day/mg
1
0.031
kg-day/mg
N/A
Cal EPA
3/18/2022
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
7.00E-02
kg-day/mg
1
0.07
kg-day/mg
N/A
DWSHA
6/9/2022
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
-
kg-day/mg
1
-
kg-day/mg
-
-
6/8/2022
Cyanide
Cyanide
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
4/7/2022
Metals (Total)
Arsenic
1.5
kg-day/mg
1
1.5
kg-day/mg
A
IRIS
4/7/2022
Barium
-
-
0.07
-
-
-
-
4/7/2022
Beryllium
-
-
0.007
-
-
-
-
4/7/2022
Cadmium (Water)
-
-
0.05
-
-
-
-
4/7/2022
Chromium, Hexavalent
0.5
kg-day/mg
0.025
20
kg-day/mg
N/A
Cal EPA
4/7/2022
Cobalt
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
4/7/2022
Copper
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
4/7/2022
Iron
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
4/7/2022
Manganese
-
-
0.04
-
-
-
-
4/7/2022
Nickel
-
-
0.04
-
-
-
-
4/7/2022
Notes:
- = No Value; (mg/kg-day)"1 = one over milligrams per kilogram-day
(1) Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) July 2004. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. Volume 1:
Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part E, Supplemental Guidance for Dermal Risk Assessment) Final. Office of Emergency and
Remedial Response. Washington D.C. EPA/540/R/99/005.
(2) To derive the Absorbed Cancer Slope Factor for Dermal, the oral cancer slope factor is divided by the oral absorption
efficiency for dermal.
(3) With the exception of HEAST, source date represents when toxicity data were researched in on-line databases.
Sources:
BaP x TEF = Carcinogenicity determined by adjusting benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) by a toxicity equivalence factor (TEF)
Cal EPA = California Environmental Protection Agency (https://calepa.ca.gov/)
DWSHA = Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories (https://www.epa.gov/sdwa/epa-non-regulatory-health-based-drinking-water-levels)
HEAST = Health Effects Assessment Summary Table (https://www.epa-heast.ornl.gov/)
IRIS = Integrated Risk Information System (https://www.epa.gov/iris)
PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Values for Superfund (https://hhpprtv.ornl.gov/)
USEPA, 1986 = Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment
USEPA, 1996 = Proposed Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment
Weight of Evidence:
A= Human Carcinogen (USEPA, 1986)
B1 = Probable Human Carcinogen - Based on Limited Evidence in Humans (USEPA, 1986)
B2 = Probable Human Carcinogen - Based on Sufficient Evidence in Animals (USEPA, 1986)
C = Possible Human Carcinogen (USEPA, 1986)
Carcinogenic to Humans (USEPA, 2005)
Known/Likely Human Carcinogen (USEPA, 1996)
LI = Likely to be Carcinogenic to Humans (PPRTV)
Likely to be Carcinogenic to Humans (USEPA, 2005)
N/A = Not Available
SU = Suggestive Evidence of Carcinogenicity in Humans (PPRTV)
Suggestive Evidence of Carcinogenic Potential (CP) (USEPA, 2005)
-------
Table A6-1
Cancer Toxicity Data - Oral/Dermal
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Constituent of Interest
Oral Cancer Slope Factor
Oral Absorption
Absorbed Cancer Slope
Factor for Dermal""
Weight of Evidence/ Cancer Guideline
Cancer Slope Factor
Value
Units
Effiency for Dermal 'h
Value
Units
Description
Source(s)
Date! si'"
(MM/DD/YYYYl
USEPA, 1999 = Revised Draft Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment
USEPA, 2005 = Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment
-------
Table A6-2
Cancer Toxicity Data - Inhalation
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Constituent of Interest
Inhalation Unit Risk
Weight of Evidence/ Cancer Guideline
Description
Inhalation Unit Risk
Value
Units
Source(s)
Date(s)'1'
(MM/DD/YYYY)
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
0.000023
m3/|jg
Likely to be Carcinogenic to Humans
IRIS
3/18/2022
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
-
-
-
-
6/9/2022
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
-
-
-
-
6/8/2022
Cyanide
Cyanide
-
-
-
-
4/7/2022
Metals (Total)
Arsenic
0.0043
m3/|jg
A
IRIS
4/7/2022
Barium
-
-
-
-
4/7/2022
Beryllium
0.0024
m3/|jg
Known/Likely Human Carcinogen
IRIS
4/7/2022
Cadmium (Water)
0.0018
m3/|jg
B1
IRIS
4/7/2022
Chromium, Hexavalent
0.084
m3/|jg
Known/Likely Human Carcinogen
Cal EPA
4/7/2022
Cobalt
0.009
m3/|jg
LI
PPRTV
4/7/2022
Copper
-
-
-
-
4/7/2022
Iron
-
-
-
-
4/7/2022
Manganese
-
-
-
-
4/7/2022
Nickel
0.00026
m3/|jg
N/A
Cal EPA
4/7/2022
Notes:
- = No Value
(|jg/m3)-1 = one over micrograms per cubic meter
(1) With the exception of HEAST, source date represents when toxicity data were researched in on-line
Sources:
BaP x TEF = Carcinogencity determined by adjusting benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) by
a toxicity equivalence factor (TEF)
Cal EPA = California Environmental Protection Agency (https://calepa.ca.gov/)
HEAST = Health Effects Assessment Summary Table (https://www.epa-heast.ornl.gov/)
IRIS = Integrated Risk Information System (https://www.epa.gov/iris)
PPRTV = Provisional Peer Reviewed Toxicity Values for Superfund (https://hhpprtv.ornl.gov/)
USEPA, 1986 = Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment
USEPA, 1996 = Proposed Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment
USEPA, 1999 = Revised Draft Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment
USEPA, 2005 = Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment
Weight of Evidence:
A= Human Carcinogen (USEPA, 1986)
B1 = Probable Human Carcinogen - Based on Limited Evidence in Humans (USEPA, 1986)
B2 = Probable Human Carcinogen - Based on Sufficient Evidence in Animals (USEPA, 1986)
C = Possible Human Carcinogen (USEPA, 1986)
Carcinogenic to Humans (USEPA, 2005)
Known/Likely Human Carcinogen (USEPA, 1996)
LI = Likely to be Carcinogenic to Humans (PPRTV)
Likely to be Carcinogenic to Humans (USEPA, 2005)
N/A= Not Available
Suggestive Evidence of Carcinogenic Potential (USEPA, 2005)
-------
Table A6-2
Cancer Toxicity Data - Inhalation
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Constituent of Interest
Inhalation Unit Risk
Weight of Evidence/ Cancer Guideline
Inhalation Unit Risk
Value
Units
Description
Source(s)
Date(s)'1'
(MM/DD/YYYY)
-------
Table A7-1
Calculation of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0124)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe:
Current/Future
Receptor Population:
On-Site Resident
Receptor Age:
Child
EPC
Cancer Risk Calculations
Non-Cancer Hazard Calculations
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Exposure Route
Chemical of Potential Concern
Value
Units
Intake/Exposure Concentration
CSF/Unit Risk
Cancer
Intake/Exposure Concentration
RfD/RfC
Hazard
Value
Units
Value
Units
Risk111
Value
Units
Value
Units
Quotient(1>
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Ingestion
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
1.10E-05
mg/L
(2)
5.48E-07
mg/kg-day
2.00E-06
mg/kg-day
0.3
Cyanide
Cyanide
4.60E-03
mg/L
(2)
2.29E-04
mg/kg-day
6.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.4
Metals (Total)
Barium
4.80E-01
mg/L
(2)
2.39E-02
mg/kg-day
2.00E-01
mg/kg-day
0.1
Cobalt
3.00E-02
mg/L
(2)
1.50E-03
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
5
Copper
2.50E-01
mg/L
(2)
1.25E-02
mg/kg-day
4.00E-02
mg/kg-day
0.3
Manganese
1.90E-01
mg/L
(2)
9.47E-03
mg/kg-day
2.40E-02
mg/kg-day
0.4
Exp. Route Total
6
Dermal
Cyanide
Cyanide
4.60E-03
mg/L
(2)
1.56E-06
mg/kg-day
6.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.003
Metals (Total)
Barium
4.80E-01
mg/L
(2)
1.05E-04
mg/kg-day
1.40E-02
mg/kg-day
0.008
Cobalt
3.00E-02
mg/L
(2)
-
2.64E-06
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.009
Copper
2.50E-01
mg/L
(2)
5.49E-05
mg/kg-day
4.00E-02
mg/kg-day
0.001
Manganese
1.90E-01
mg/L
(2)
4.17E-05
mg/kg-day
9.60E-04
mg/kg-day
0.04
Exp. Route Total
0.06
Exp. Point Total
7
Exp. Medium Total
7
Medium Total
7
Notes:
Total of Receptor Risks Across All Media
Total of Receptor Hazards Across All Media
7
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
(2) Cancer risk is only presented for the lifetime receptor, whereas non-cancer hazard is calculated separately for the child and adult receptor.
-------
Table A7-2
Calculation of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0124)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe:
Current/Future
Receptor Population:
On-Site Resident
Receptor Age:
Adult
EPC
Cancer Risk Calculations
Non-Cancer Hazard Calculations
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Exposure Route
Chemical of Potential Concern
Value
Units
Intake/Exposure Concentration
CSF/Unit Risk
Cancer
Intake/Exposure Concentration
RfD/RfC
Hazard
Value
Units
Value
Units
Risk111
Value
Units
Value
Units
Quotient(1>
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Ingestion
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
1.10E-05
mg/L
(2)
3.30E-07
mg/kg-day
2.00E-06
mg/kg-day
0.2
Cyanide
Cyanide
4.60E-03
mg/L
(2)
1.38E-04
mg/kg-day
6.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.2
Metals (Total)
Barium
4.80E-01
mg/L
(2)
1.44E-02
mg/kg-day
2.00E-01
mg/kg-day
0.07
Cobalt
3.00E-02
mg/L
(2)
8.99E-04
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
3
Copper
2.50E-01
mg/L
(2)
7.49E-03
mg/kg-day
4.00E-02
mg/kg-day
0.2
Manganese
1.90E-01
mg/L
(2)
5.69E-03
mg/kg-day
2.40E-02
mg/kg-day
0.2
Exp. Route Total
4
Dermal
Cyanide
Cyanide
4.60E-03
mg/L
(2)
1.09E-06
mg/kg-day
6.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.002
Metals (Total)
Barium
4.80E-01
mg/L
(2)
8.03E-05
mg/kg-day
1.40E-02
mg/kg-day
0.006
Cobalt
3.00E-02
mg/L
(2)
2.01E-06
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.007
Copper
2.50E-01
mg/L
(2)
-
4.18E-05
mg/kg-day
4.00E-02
mg/kg-day
0.001
Manganese
1.90E-01
mg/L
(2)
3.18E-05
mg/kg-day
9.60E-04
mg/kg-day
0.03
Exp. Route Total
0.05
Exp. Point Total
4
Exp. Medium Total
4
Indoor Air
Shower/Bath (Vapors)
Inhalation
Cyanide
Cyanide
2.63E-04
Ijg'm3
(2)
3.46E-03
jjg/m3
8.00E-01
jjg/m3
0.004
Exp. Route Total
0.004
Exp. Point Total
0.004
Exp. Medium Total
0.004
Medium Total
4
Notes:
Total of Receptor Risks Across All Media
Total of Receptor Hazards Across All Media
4
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
(2) Cancer risk is only presented for the lifetime receptor, whereas non-cancer hazard is calculated separately for the child and adult receptor.
-------
Table A7-3
Calculation of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0124)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe:
Current/Future
Receptor Population:
On-Site Resident
Receptor Age:
Lifetime
EPC
Cancer Risk Calculations
Non-Cancer Hazard Calculations
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Exposure Route
Chemical of Potential Concern
Value
Units
Intake/Exposure Concentration
CSF/Unit Risk
Cancer
Intake/Exposure Concentration
RfD/RfC
Hazard
Value
Units
Value
Units
Risk111
Value
Units
Value
Units
Quotient(1>
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Ingestion
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
Cyanide
Cyanide
Metals (Total)
Barium
Cobalt
Copper
Manganese
1.10E-05
4.60E-03
4.80E-01
3.00E-02
2.50E-01
1.90E-01
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
1.41E-07
5.90E-05
6.16E-03
3.85E-04
3.21E-03
2.44E-03
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
Exp. Route Total
Dermal
Cyanide
Cyanide
Metals (Total)
Barium
Cobalt
Copper
Manganese
4.60E-03
4.80E-01
3.00E-02
2.50E-01
1.90E-01
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
4.53E-07
3.29E-05
8.22E-07
1.71E-05
1.30E-05
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
-
Exp. Route Total
Exp. Point Total
Exp. Medium Total
Indoor Air
Shower/Bath (Vapors)
Inhalation
Cyanide
Cyanide
2.63E-04
Ijg'm3
9.89E-04
Ijg'm3
(2)
Exp. Route Total
Exp. Point Total
Exp. Medium Total
Medium Total
Notes:
Total of Receptor Risks Across All Media
Total of Receptor Hazards Across All Media
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
(2) Cancer risk is only presented for the lifetime receptor, whereas non-cancer hazard is calculated separately for the child and adult receptor.
-------
Table A7-4
Calculation of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0155)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe:
Current/Future
Receptor Population:
On-Site Resident
Receptor Age:
Child
EPC
Cancer Risk Calculations
Non-Cancer Hazard Calculations
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Exposure Route
Chemical of Potential Concern
Value
Units
Intake/Exposure Concentration
CSF/Unit Risk
Cancer
Intake/Exposure Concentration
RfD/RfC
Hazard
Value
Units
Value
Units
Risk 111
Value
Units
Value
Units
Quotient(1>
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Ingestion
Cyanide
Cyanide
4.80E-03
mg/L
(2)
2.39E-04
mg/kg-day
6.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.4
Metals (Total)
Arsenic
3.80E-04
mg/L
(2)
1.89E-05
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.06
Barium
1.10E+00
mg/L
(2)
5.48E-02
mg/kg-day
2.00E-01
mg/kg-day
0.3
Cadmium (Water)
3.30E-04
mg/L
(2)
1.65E-05
mg/kg-day
1.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.2
Cobalt
1.50E-02
mg/L
(2)
7.48E-04
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
2
Copper
1.40E-01
mg/L
(2)
6.98E-03
mg/kg-day
4.00E-02
mg/kg-day
0.2
Manganese
1.20E-01
mg/L
(2)
5.98E-03
mg/kg-day
2.40E-02
mg/kg-day
0.2
Exp. Route Total
4
Dermal
Cyanide
Cyanide
4.80E-03
mg/L
(2)
1.63E-06
mg/kg-day
6.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.003
Metals (Total)
Arsenic
3.80E-04
mg/L
(2)
8.35E-08
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0003
Barium
1.10E+00
mg/L
(2)
2.42E-04
mg/kg-day
1.40E-02
mg/kg-day
0.02
Cadmium (Water)
3.30E-04
mg/L
(2)
7.25E-08
mg/kg-day
5.00E-06
mg/kg-day
0.01
Cobalt
1.50E-02
mg/L
(2)
1.32E-06
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.004
Copper
1.40E-01
mg/L
(2)
-
3.08E-05
mg/kg-day
4.00E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0008
Manganese
1.20E-01
mg/L
(2)
-
2.64E-05
mg/kg-day
9.60E-04
mg/kg-day
0.03
Exp. Route Total
0.07
Exp. Point Total
4
Exp. Medium Total
4
Medium Total
4
Notes:
Total of Receptor Risks Across All Media
Total of Receptor Hazards Across All Media
4
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
(2) Cancer risk is only presented for the lifetime receptor, whereas non-cancer hazard is calculated separately for the child and adult receptor.
-------
Table A7-5
Calculation of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0155)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe:
Current/Future
Receptor Population:
On-Site Resident
Receptor Age:
Adult
EPC
Cancer Risk Calculations
Non-Cancer Hazard Calculations
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Exposure Route
Chemical of Potential Concern
Value
Units
Intake/Exposure Concentration
CSF/Unit Risk
Cancer
Intake/Exposure Concentration
RfD/RfC
Hazard
Value
Units
Value
Units
Risk 111
Value
Units
Value
Units
Quotient(1>
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Ingestion
Cyanide
Cyanide
4.80E-03
mg/L
(2)
1.44E-04
mg/kg-day
6.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.2
Metals (Total)
Arsenic
3.80E-04
mg/L
(2)
1.14E-05
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.04
Barium
1.10E+00
mg/L
(2)
3.30E-02
mg/kg-day
2.00E-01
mg/kg-day
0.2
Cadmium (Water)
3.30E-04
mg/L
(2)
9.89E-06
mg/kg-day
1.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.1
Cobalt
1.50E-02
mg/L
(2)
4.49E-04
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
1
Copper
1.40E-01
mg/L
(2)
4.20E-03
mg/kg-day
4.00E-02
mg/kg-day
0.1
Manganese
1.20E-01
mg/L
(2)
3.60E-03
mg/kg-day
2.40E-02
mg/kg-day
0.1
Exp. Route Total
2
Dermal
Cyanide
Cyanide
4.80E-03
mg/L
(2)
1.13E-06
mg/kg-day
6.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.002
Metals (Total)
Arsenic
3.80E-04
mg/L
(2)
6.36E-08
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0002
Barium
1.10E+00
mg/L
(2)
1.84E-04
mg/kg-day
1.40E-02
mg/kg-day
0.01
Cadmium (Water)
3.30E-04
mg/L
(2)
5.52E-08
mg/kg-day
5.00E-06
mg/kg-day
0.01
Cobalt
1.50E-02
mg/L
(2)
1.00E-06
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.003
Copper
1.40E-01
mg/L
(2)
-
2.34E-05
mg/kg-day
4.00E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0006
Manganese
1.20E-01
mg/L
(2)
-
2.01E-05
mg/kg-day
9.60E-04
mg/kg-day
0.02
Exp. Route Total
0.05
Exp. Point Total
2
Exp. Medium Total
2
Indoor Air
Shower/Bath (Vapors)
Inhalation
Cyanide
Cyanide
2.74E-04
jjg/m3
(2)
-
3.61E-03
jjg/m3
8.00E-01
jjg/m3
0.005
Exp. Route Total
0.005
Exp. Point Total
0.005
Exp. Medium Total
0.005
Medium Total
2
Notes:
Total of Receptor Risks Across All Media
Total of Receptor Hazards Across All Media
2
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
(2) Cancer risk is only presented for the lifetime receptor, whereas non-cancer hazard is calculated separately for the child and adult receptor.
-------
Table A7-6
Calculation of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0155)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe:
Current/Future
Receptor Population:
On-Site Resident
Receptor Age:
Lifetime
EPC
Cancer Risk Calculations
Non-Cancer Hazard Calculations
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Exposure Route
Chemical of Potential Concern
Value
Units
Intake/Exposure Concentration
CSF/Unit Risk
Cancer
Intake/Exposure Concentration
RfD/RfC
Hazard
Value
Units
Value
Units
Risk111
Value
Units
Value
Units
Quotient(1>
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Ingestion
Cyanide
Cyanide
Metals (Total)
4.80E-03
mg/L
6.16E-05
mg/kg-day
(2)
Arsenic
3.80E-04
mg/L
4.88E-06
mg/kg-day
1.50E+00
1/(mg/kg-day)
7E-06
(2)
Barium
1.10E+00
mg/L
1.41E-02
mg/kg-day
(2)
Cadmium (Water)
3.30E-04
mg/L
4.24E-06
mg/kg-day
(2)
Cobalt
1.50E-02
mg/L
1.93E-04
mg/kg-day
(2)
Copper
1.40E-01
mg/L
1.80E-03
mg/kg-day
-
(2)
Manganese
1.20E-01
mg/L
1.54E-03
mg/kg-day
(2)
-
Exp. Route Total
7E-06
Dermal
Cyanide
Cyanide
Metals (Total)
4.80E-03
mg/L
4.73E-07
mg/kg-day
(2)
Arsenic
3.80E-04
mg/L
2.60E-08
mg/kg-day
1.50E+00
1/(mg/kg-day)
4E-08
(2)
Barium
1.10E+00
mg/L
7.54E-05
mg/kg-day
(2)
Cadmium (Water)
3.30E-04
mg/L
2.26E-08
mg/kg-day
(2)
Cobalt
1.50E-02
mg/L
4.11E-07
mg/kg-day
(2)
Copper
1.40E-01
mg/L
9.60E-06
mg/kg-day
(2)
Manganese
1.20E-01
mg/L
8.22E-06
mg/kg-day
(2)
Exp. Route Total
4E-08
Exp. Point Total
7E-06
Exp. Medium Total
7E-06
Indoor Air
Shower/Bath (Vapors)
Inhalation
Cyanide
Cyanide
2.74E-04
Ijg'm3
1.03E-03
Ijg'm3
(2)
Exp. Route Total
Exp. Point Total
Exp. Medium Total
Medium Total
7E-06
Notes:
Total of Receptor Risks Across All Media
7E-06
Total of Receptor Hazards Across All Media
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
(2) Cancer risk is only presented for the lifetime receptor, whereas non-cancer hazard is calculated separately for the child and adult receptor.
-------
Table A7-7
Calculation of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0170)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe:
Current/Future
Receptor Population:
On-Site Resident
Receptor Age:
Child
EPC
Cancer Risk Calculations
Non-Cancer Hazard Calculations
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Exposure Route
Chemical of Potential Concern
Value
Units
Intake/Exposure Concentration
CSF/Unit Risk
Cancer
Intake/Exposure Concentration
RfD/RfC
Hazard
Value
Units
Value
Units
Risk 111
Value
Units
Value
Units
Quotient(1>
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Ingestion
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
1.40E-03
mg/L
(2)
6.98E-05
mg/kg-day
1.00E-02
mg/kg-day
0.007
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
1.50E-05
mg/L
(2)
7.48E-07
mg/kg-day
3.00E-06
mg/kg-day
0.2
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
2.60E-04
mg/L
(2)
1.30E-05
mg/kg-day
2.00E-06
mg/kg-day
6
Metals (Total)
Chromium, Hexavalent
5.87E-03
mg/L
(2)
2.93E-04
mg/kg-day
3.00E-03
mg/kg-day
0.1
Cobalt
6.50E-03
mg/L
(2)
3.24E-04
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
1
Nickel
5.30E-02
mg/L
(2)
2.64E-03
mg/kg-day
2.00E-02
mg/kg-day
0.1
Exp. Route Total
8
Dermal
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
1.40E-03
mg/L
(2)
5.53E-06
mg/kg-day
1.00E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0006
Metals (Total)
Chromium, Hexavalent
5.87E-03
mg/L
(2)
2.58E-06
mg/kg-day
7.50E-05
mg/kg-day
0.03
Cobalt
6.50E-03
mg/L
(2)
5.71E-07
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.002
Nickel
5.30E-02
mg/L
(2)
2.33E-06
mg/kg-day
8.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.003
Exp. Route Total
0.04
Exp. Point Total
8
Exp. Medium Total
8
Indoor Air
Indoor Air
(Vapor Intrusion)
Inhalation
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
1.76E-01
jjg/m3
(2)
1.69E-01
jjg/m3
9.77E+01
jjg/m3
0.002
Exp. Route Total
0.002
Exp. Point Total
0.002
Exp. Medium Total
0.002
Medium Total
8
Notes:
Total of Receptor Risks Across All Media
Total of Receptor Hazards Across All Media
8
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
(2) Cancer risk is only presented for the lifetime receptor, whereas non-cancer hazard is calculated separately for the child and adult receptor.
-------
Table A7-8
Calculation of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0170)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe:
Current/Future
Receptor Population:
On-Site Resident
Receptor Age:
Adult
EPC
Cancer Risk Calculations
Non-Cancer Hazard Calculations
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Exposure Route
Chemical of Potential Concern
Value
Units
Intake/Exposure Concentration
CSF/Unit Risk
Cancer
Intake/Exposure Concentration
RfD/RfC
Hazard
Value
Units
Value
Units
Risk 111
Value
Units
Value
Units
Quotient(1>
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Ingestion
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
1.40E-03
mg/L
(2)
4.20E-05
mg/kg-day
1.00E-02
mg/kg-day
0.004
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
1.50E-05
mg/L
(2)
4.49E-07
mg/kg-day
3.00E-06
mg/kg-day
0.1
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
2.60E-04
mg/L
(2)
7.79E-06
mg/kg-day
2.00E-06
mg/kg-day
4
Metals (Total)
Chromium, Hexavalent
5.87E-03
mg/L
(2)
1.76E-04
mg/kg-day
3.00E-03
mg/kg-day
0.06
Cobalt
6.50E-03
mg/L
(2)
1.95E-04
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.6
Nickel
5.30E-02
mg/L
(2)
1.59E-03
mg/kg-day
2.00E-02
mg/kg-day
0.08
Exp. Route Total
5
Dermal
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
1.40E-03
mg/L
(2)
3.67E-06
mg/kg-day
1.00E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0004
Metals (Total)
Chromium, Hexavalent
5.87E-03
mg/L
(2)
1.96E-06
mg/kg-day
7.50E-05
mg/kg-day
0.03
Cobalt
6.50E-03
mg/L
(2)
4.35E-07
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.001
Nickel
5.30E-02
mg/L
(2)
1.77E-06
mg/kg-day
8.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.002
Exp. Route Total
0.03
Exp. Point Total
5
Exp. Medium Total
5
Indoor Air
Shower/Bath (Vapors)
Inhalation
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
1.12E-04
jjg/m3
(2)
1.48E-03
jjg/m3
9.77E+01
jjg/m3
0.00002
Exp. Route Total
0.00002
Exp. Point Total
0.00002
Exp. Medium Total
0.00002
Indoor Air
(Vapor Intrusion)
Inhalation
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
1.76E-01
jjg/m3
(2)
1.69E-01
jjg/m3
9.77E+01
jjg/m3
0.002
Exp. Route Total
0.002
Exp. Point Total
0.002
Exp. Medium Total
0.002
Medium Total
5
Notes:
Total of Receptor Risks Across All Media
Total of Receptor Hazards Across All Media
5
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
(2) Cancer risk is only presented for the lifetime receptor, whereas non-cancer hazard is calculated separately for the child and adult receptor.
-------
Table A7-9
Calculation of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0170)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe:
Current/Future
Receptor Population:
On-Site Resident
Receptor Age:
Lifetime
EPC
Cancer Risk Calculations
Non-Cancer Hazard Calculations
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Exposure Route
Chemical of Potential Concern
Value
Units
Intake/Exposure Concentration
CSF/Unit Risk
Cancer
Intake/Exposure Concentration
RfD/RfC
Hazard
Value
Units
Value
Units
Risk 111
Value
Units
Value
Units
Quotient(1>
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Ingestion
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
1.40E-03
mg/L
1.80E-05
mg/kg-day
3.10E-02
1/(mg/kg-day)
6E-07
(2)
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
1.50E-05
mg/L
1.93E-07
mg/kg-day
7.00E-02
1/(mg/kg-day)
1E-08
(2)
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
2.60E-04
mg/L
3.34E-06
mg/kg-day
(2)
Metals (Total)
Chromium, Hexavalent
5.87E-03
mg/L
2.34E-04
mg/kg-day
5.00E-01
1/(mg/kg-day)
1E-04
(2)
Cobalt
6.50E-03
mg/L
8.34E-05
mg/kg-day
(2)
Nickel
5.30E-02
mg/L
6.80E-04
mg/kg-day
(2)
Exp. Route Total
1E-04
Dermal
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
1.40E-03
mg/L
1.55E-06
mg/kg-day
3.10E-02
1/(mg/kg-day)
5E-08
(2)
Metals (Total)
Chromium, Hexavalent
5.87E-03
mg/L
2.52E-06
mg/kg-day
2.00E+01
1/(mg/kg-day)
5E-05
(2)
Cobalt
6.50E-03
mg/L
1.78E-07
mg/kg-day
(2)
-
Nickel
5.30E-02
mg/L
7.27E-07
mg/kg-day
(2)
Exp. Route Total
5E-05
Exp. Point Total
2E-04
Exp. Medium Total
2E-04
Indoor Air
Shower/Bath (Vapors)
Inhalation
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
1.12E-04
Ijg'm3
4.22E-04
Ijg'm3
2.30E-05
m3/jj g
1E-08
(2)
Exp. Route Total
1E-08
Exp. Point Total
1E-08
Exp. Medium Total
1E-08
Indoor Air
(Vapor Intrusion)
Inhalation
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
1.76E-01
jjg/m3
6.27E-02
jjg/m3
2.30E-05
m3/jj g
1E-06
(2)
Exp. Route Total
1E-06
Exp. Point Total
1E-06
Exp. Medium Total
1E-06
Medium Total
2E-04
Notes:
Total of Receptor Risks Across All Media
2E-04
Total of Receptor Hazards Across All Media
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
(2) Cancer risk is only presented for the lifetime receptor, whereas non-cancer hazard is calculated separately for the child and adult receptor.
-------
Table A7-10
Calculation of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0173)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe:
Current/Future
Receptor Population:
On-Site Resident
Receptor Age:
Child
EPC
Cancer Risk Calculations
Non-Cancer Hazard Calculations
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Exposure Route
Chemical of Potential Concern
Value
Units
Intake/Exposure Concentration
CSF/Unit Risk
Cancer
Intake/Exposure Concentration
RfD/RfC
Hazard
Value
Units
Value
Units
Risk 111
Value
Units
Value
Units
Quotient(1>
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Ingestion
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
2.40E-05
mg/L
(2)
1.20E-06
mg/kg-day
2.00E-06
mg/kg-day
0.6
Cyanide
Cyanide
9.50E-03
mg/L
(2)
4.74E-04
mg/kg-day
6.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.8
Metals (Total)
Barium
4.30E-01
mg/L
(2)
2.14E-02
mg/kg-day
2.00E-01
mg/kg-day
0.1
Cobalt
2.20E-02
mg/L
(2)
1.10E-03
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
4
Manganese
2.20E-01
mg/L
(2)
1.10E-02
mg/kg-day
2.40E-02
mg/kg-day
0.5
Exp. Route Total
6
Dermal
Cyanide
Cyanide
9.50E-03
mg/L
(2)
3.22E-06
mg/kg-day
6.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.005
Metals (Total)
Barium
4.30E-01
mg/L
(2)
9.45E-05
mg/kg-day
1.40E-02
mg/kg-day
0.007
Cobalt
2.20E-02
mg/L
(2)
1.93E-06
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.006
Manganese
2.20E-01
mg/L
(2)
-
4.83E-05
mg/kg-day
9.60E-04
mg/kg-day
0.05
Exp. Route Total
0.07
Exp. Point Total
6
Exp. Medium Total
6
Medium Total
6
Notes:
Total of Receptor Risks Across All Media
Total of Receptor Hazards Across All Media
6
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
(2) Cancer risk is only presented for the lifetime receptor, whereas non-cancer hazard is calculated separately for the child and adult receptor.
-------
Table A7-11
Calculation of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0173)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe:
Current/Future
Receptor Population:
On-Site Resident
Receptor Age:
Adult
EPC
Cancer Risk Calculations
Non-Cancer Hazard Calculations
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Exposure Route
Chemical of Potential Concern
Value
Units
Intake/Exposure Concentration
CSF/Unit Risk
Cancer
Intake/Exposure Concentration
RfD/RfC
Hazard
Value
Units
Value
Units
Risk 111
Value
Units
Value
Units
Quotient(1>
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Ingestion
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
2.40E-05
mg/L
(2)
7.19E-07
mg/kg-day
2.00E-06
mg/kg-day
0.4
Cyanide
Cyanide
9.50E-03
mg/L
(2)
2.85E-04
mg/kg-day
6.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.5
Metals (Total)
Barium
4.30E-01
mg/L
(2)
1.29E-02
mg/kg-day
2.00E-01
mg/kg-day
0.06
Cobalt
2.20E-02
mg/L
(2)
6.59E-04
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
2
Manganese
2.20E-01
mg/L
(2)
6.59E-03
mg/kg-day
2.40E-02
mg/kg-day
0.3
Exp. Route Total
3
Dermal
Cyanide
Cyanide
9.50E-03
mg/L
(2)
2.25E-06
mg/kg-day
6.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.004
Metals (Total)
Barium
4.30E-01
mg/L
(2)
7.19E-05
mg/kg-day
1.40E-02
mg/kg-day
0.005
Cobalt
2.20E-02
mg/L
(2)
1.47E-06
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.005
Manganese
2.20E-01
mg/L
(2)
-
3.68E-05
mg/kg-day
9.60E-04
mg/kg-day
0.04
Exp. Route Total
0.05
Exp. Point Total
3
Exp. Medium Total
3
Indoor Air
Shower/Bath (Vapors)
Inhalation
Cyanide
Cyanide
5.43E-04
jjg/m3
(2)
-
7.15E-03
jjg/m3
8.00E-01
jjg/m3
0.009
Exp. Route Total
0.009
Exp. Point Total
0.009
Exp. Medium Total
0.009
Medium Total
3
Notes:
Total of Receptor Risks Across All Media
Total of Receptor Hazards Across All Media
3
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
(2) Cancer risk is only presented for the lifetime receptor, whereas non-cancer hazard is calculated separately for the child and adult receptor.
-------
Table A7-12
Calculation of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0173)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe:
Current/Future
Receptor Population:
On-Site Resident
Receptor Age:
Lifetime
EPC
Cancer Risk Calculations
Non-Cancer Hazard Calculations
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Exposure Route
Chemical of Potential Concern
Value
Units
Intake/Exposure Concentration
CSF/Unit Risk
Cancer
Intake/Exposure Concentration
RfD/RfC
Hazard
Value
Units
Value
Units
Risk111
Value
Units
Value
Units
Quotient(1>
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Ingestion
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
Cyanide
Cyanide
Metals (Total)
Barium
Cobalt
Manganese
2.40E-05
9.50E-03
4.30E-01
2.20E-02
2.20E-01
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
3.08E-07
1.22E-04
5.52E-03
2.82E-04
2.82E-03
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
Exp. Route Total
Dermal
Cyanide
Cyanide
Metals (Total)
Barium
Cobalt
Manganese
9.50E-03
4.30E-01
2.20E-02
2.20E-01
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
9.36E-07
2.95E-05
6.03E-07
1.51E-05
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
-
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
-
Exp. Route Total
Exp. Point Total
Exp. Medium Total
Indoor Air
Shower/Bath (Vapors)
Inhalation
Cyanide
Cyanide
5.43E-04
Ijg'm3
2.04E-03
Ijg'm3
(2)
Exp. Route Total
Exp. Point Total
Exp. Medium Total
Medium Total
Notes:
Total of Receptor Risks Across All Media
Total of Receptor Hazards Across All Media
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
(2) Cancer risk is only presented for the lifetime receptor, whereas non-cancer hazard is calculated separately for the child and adult receptor.
-------
Table A7-13
Calculation of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0176)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe:
Current/Future
Receptor Population:
On-Site Resident
Receptor Age:
Child
EPC
Cancer Risk Calculations
Non-Cancer Hazard Calculations
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Exposure Route
Chemical of Potential Concern
Value
Units
Intake/Exposure Concentration
CSF/Unit Risk
Cancer
Intake/Exposure Concentration
RfD/RfC
Hazard
Value
Units
Value
Units
Risk111
Value
Units
Value
Units
Quotient(1>
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Ingestion
Cyanide
Cyanide
9.00E-03
mg/L
(2)
4.49E-04
mg/kg-day
6.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.7
Metals (Total)
Barium
4.20E-01
mg/L
(2)
2.09E-02
mg/kg-day
2.00E-01
mg/kg-day
0.1
Cadmium (Water)
2.00E-04
mg/L
(2)
9.97E-06
mg/kg-day
1.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.1
Cobalt
1.40E-02
mg/L
(2)
6.98E-04
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
2
Manganese
1.60E-01
mg/L
(2)
7.98E-03
mg/kg-day
2.40E-02
mg/kg-day
0.3
Exp. Route Total
4
Dermal
Cyanide
Cyanide
9.00E-03
mg/L
(2)
3.05E-06
mg/kg-day
6.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.005
Metals (Total)
Barium
4.20E-01
mg/L
(2)
9.23E-05
mg/kg-day
1.40E-02
mg/kg-day
0.007
Cadmium (Water)
2.00E-04
mg/L
(2)
4.39E-08
mg/kg-day
5.00E-06
mg/kg-day
0.009
Cobalt
1.40E-02
mg/L
(2)
-
1.23E-06
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.004
Manganese
1.60E-01
mg/L
(2)
3.52E-05
mg/kg-day
9.60E-04
mg/kg-day
0.04
Exp. Route Total
0.06
Exp. Point Total
4
Exp. Medium Total
4
Medium Total
4
Notes:
Total of Receptor Risks Across All Media
Total of Receptor Hazards Across All Media
4
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
(2) Cancer risk is only presented for the lifetime receptor, whereas non-cancer hazard is calculated separately for the child and adult receptor.
-------
Table A7-14
Calculation of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0176)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe:
Current/Future
Receptor Population:
On-Site Resident
Receptor Age:
Adult
EPC
Cancer Risk Calculations
Non-Cancer Hazard Calculations
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Exposure Route
Chemical of Potential Concern
Value
Units
Intake/Exposure Concentration
CSF/Unit Risk
Cancer
Intake/Exposure Concentration
RfD/RfC
Hazard
Value
Units
Value
Units
Risk 111
Value
Units
Value
Units
Quotient(1>
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Ingestion
Cyanide
Cyanide
9.00E-03
mg/L
(2)
2.70E-04
mg/kg-day
6.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.4
Metals (Total)
Barium
4.20E-01
mg/L
(2)
1.26E-02
mg/kg-day
2.00E-01
mg/kg-day
0.06
Cadmium (Water)
2.00E-04
mg/L
(2)
5.99E-06
mg/kg-day
1.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.06
Cobalt
1.40E-02
mg/L
(2)
4.20E-04
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
1
Manganese
1.60E-01
mg/L
(2)
4.79E-03
mg/kg-day
2.40E-02
mg/kg-day
0.2
Exp. Route Total
2
Dermal
Cyanide
Cyanide
9.00E-03
mg/L
(2)
2.13E-06
mg/kg-day
6.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.004
Metals (Total)
Barium
4.20E-01
mg/L
(2)
7.02E-05
mg/kg-day
1.40E-02
mg/kg-day
0.005
Cadmium (Water)
2.00E-04
mg/L
(2)
3.34E-08
mg/kg-day
5.00E-06
mg/kg-day
0.007
Cobalt
1.40E-02
mg/L
(2)
9.37E-07
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.003
Manganese
1.60E-01
mg/L
(2)
-
2.68E-05
mg/kg-day
9.60E-04
mg/kg-day
0.03
Exp. Route Total
0.05
Exp. Point Total
2
Exp. Medium Total
2
Indoor Air
Shower/Bath (Vapors)
Inhalation
Cyanide
Cyanide
5.14E-04
jjg/m3
(2)
-
6.77E-03
jjg/m3
8.00E-01
jjg/m3
0.008
Exp. Route Total
0.008
Exp. Point Total
0.008
Exp. Medium Total
0.008
Medium Total
2
Notes:
Total of Receptor Risks Across All Media
Total of Receptor Hazards Across All Media
2
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
(2) Cancer risk is only presented for the lifetime receptor, whereas non-cancer hazard is calculated separately for the child and adult receptor.
-------
Table A7-15
Calculation of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0176)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe:
Current/Future
Receptor Population:
On-Site Resident
Receptor Age:
Lifetime
EPC
Cancer Risk Calculations
Non-Cancer Hazard Calculations
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Exposure Route
Chemical of Potential Concern
Value
Units
Intake/Exposure Concentration
CSF/Unit Risk
Cancer
Intake/Exposure Concentration
RfD/RfC
Hazard
Value
Units
Value
Units
Risk111
Value
Units
Value
Units
Quotient(1>
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Ingestion
Cyanide
Cyanide
Metals (Total)
Barium
Cadmium (Water)
Cobalt
Manganese
9.00E-03
4.20E-01
2.00E-04
1.40E-02
1.60E-01
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
1.16E-04
5.39E-03
2.57E-06
1.80E-04
2.05E-03
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
Exp. Route Total
Dermal
Cyanide
Cyanide
Metals (Total)
Barium
Cadmium (Water)
Cobalt
Manganese
9.00E-03
4.20E-01
2.00E-04
1.40E-02
1.60E-01
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
8.87E-07
2.88E-05
1.37E-08
3.84E-07
1.10E-05
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
-
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
-
Exp. Route Total
Exp. Point Total
Exp. Medium Total
Indoor Air
Shower/Bath (Vapors)
Inhalation
Cyanide
Cyanide
5.14E-04
Ijg'm3
1.94E-03
Ijg'm3
(2)
Exp. Route Total
Exp. Point Total
Exp. Medium Total
Medium Total
Notes:
Total of Receptor Risks Across All Media
Total of Receptor Hazards Across All Media
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
(2) Cancer risk is only presented for the lifetime receptor, whereas non-cancer hazard is calculated separately for the child and adult receptor.
-------
Table A7-16
Calculation of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0182)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe:
Current/Future
Receptor Population:
On-Site Resident
Receptor Age:
Child
EPC
Cancer Risk Calculations
Non-Cancer Hazard Calculations
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Exposure Route
Chemical of Potential Concern
Value
Units
Intake/Exposure Concentration
CSF/Unit Risk
Cancer
Intake/Exposure Concentration
RfD/RfC
Hazard
Value
Units
Value
Units
Risk 111
Value
Units
Value
Units
Quotient(1>
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Ingestion
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
1.30E-05
mg/L
(2)
6.48E-07
mg/kg-day
3.00E-06
mg/kg-day
0.2
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
2.20E-04
mg/L
(2)
1.10E-05
mg/kg-day
2.00E-06
mg/kg-day
5
Cyanide
Cyanide
3.60E-03
mg/L
(2)
1.80E-04
mg/kg-day
6.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.3
Metals (Total)
Cobalt
2.50E-02
mg/L
(2)
1.25E-03
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
4
Manganese
3.80E-01
mg/L
(2)
1.89E-02
mg/kg-day
2.40E-02
mg/kg-day
0.8
Exp. Route Total
11
Dermal
Cyanide
Cyanide
3.60E-03
mg/L
(2)
1.22E-06
mg/kg-day
6.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.002
Metals (Total)
Cobalt
2.50E-02
mg/L
(2)
2.20E-06
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.007
Manganese
3.80E-01
mg/L
(2)
8.35E-05
mg/kg-day
9.60E-04
mg/kg-day
0.09
Exp. Route Total
0.1
Exp. Point Total
11
Exp. Medium Total
11
Medium Total
11
Notes:
Total of Receptor Risks Across All Media
Total of Receptor Hazards Across All Media
11
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
(2) Cancer risk is only presented for the lifetime receptor, whereas non-cancer hazard is calculated separately for the child and adult receptor.
-------
Table A7-17
Calculation of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0182)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe:
Current/Future
Receptor Population:
On-Site Resident
Receptor Age:
Adult
EPC
Cancer Risk Calculations
Non-Cancer Hazard Calculations
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Exposure Route
Chemical of Potential Concern
Value
Units
Intake/Exposure Concentration
CSF/Unit Risk
Cancer
Intake/Exposure Concentration
RfD/RfC
Hazard
Value
Units
Value
Units
Risk 111
Value
Units
Value
Units
Quotient(1>
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Ingestion
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
1.30E-05
mg/L
(2)
3.90E-07
mg/kg-day
3.00E-06
mg/kg-day
0.1
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
2.20E-04
mg/L
(2)
6.59E-06
mg/kg-day
2.00E-06
mg/kg-day
3
Cyanide
Cyanide
3.60E-03
mg/L
(2)
1.08E-04
mg/kg-day
6.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.2
Metals (Total)
Cobalt
2.50E-02
mg/L
(2)
7.49E-04
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
2
Manganese
3.80E-01
mg/L
(2)
1.14E-02
mg/kg-day
2.40E-02
mg/kg-day
0.5
Exp. Route Total
7
Dermal
Cyanide
Cyanide
3.60E-03
mg/L
(2)
8.51E-07
mg/kg-day
6.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.001
Metals (Total)
Cobalt
2.50E-02
mg/L
(2)
1.67E-06
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.006
Manganese
3.80E-01
mg/L
(2)
6.36E-05
mg/kg-day
9.60E-04
mg/kg-day
0.07
Exp. Route Total
0.07
Exp. Point Total
7
Exp. Medium Total
7
Indoor Air
Shower/Bath (Vapors)
Inhalation
Cyanide
Cyanide
2.06E-04
jjg/m3
(2)
2.71E-03
jjg/m3
8.00E-01
jjg/m3
0.003
Exp. Route Total
0.003
Exp. Point Total
0.003
Exp. Medium Total
0.003
Medium Total
7
Notes:
Total of Receptor Risks Across All Media
Total of Receptor Hazards Across All Media
7
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
(2) Cancer risk is only presented for the lifetime receptor, whereas non-cancer hazard is calculated separately for the child and adult receptor.
-------
Table A7-18
Calculation of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0182)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe:
Current/Future
Receptor Population:
On-Site Resident
Receptor Age:
Lifetime
EPC
Cancer Risk Calculations
Non-Cancer Hazard Calculations
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Exposure Route
Chemical of Potential Concern
Value
Units
Intake/Exposure Concentration
CSF/Unit Risk
Cancer
Intake/Exposure Concentration
RfD/RfC
Hazard
Value
Units
Value
Units
Risk111
Value
Units
Value
Units
Quotient(1>
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Ingestion
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
1.30E-05
mg/L
1.67E-07
mg/kg-day
7.00E-02
1/(mg/kg-day)
1E-08
(2)
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
2.20E-04
mg/L
2.82E-06
mg/kg-day
(2)
Cyanide
Cyanide
3.60E-03
mg/L
4.62E-05
mg/kg-day
(2)
Metals (Total)
Cobalt
2.50E-02
mg/L
3.21E-04
mg/kg-day
(2)
Manganese
3.80E-01
mg/L
4.88E-03
mg/kg-day
(2)
Exp. Route Total
1E-08
Dermal
Cyanide
Cyanide
Metals (Total)
Cobalt
Manganese
3.60E-03
2.50E-02
3.80E-01
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
3.55E-07
6.85E-07
2.60E-05
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
-
(2)
(2)
(2)
Exp. Route Total
Exp. Point Total
1E-08
Exp. Medium Total
1E-08
Indoor Air
Shower/Bath (Vapors)
Inhalation
Cyanide
Cyanide
2.06E-04
Ijg'm3
7.74E-04
Ijg'm3
(2)
Exp. Route Total
Exp. Point Total
Exp. Medium Total
Medium Total
1E-08
Notes:
Total of Receptor Risks Across All Media
1E-08
Total of Receptor Hazards Across All Media
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
(2) Cancer risk is only presented for the lifetime receptor, whereas non-cancer hazard is calculated separately for the child and adult receptor.
-------
Table A7-19
Calculation of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0197)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe:
Current/Future
Receptor Population:
On-Site Resident
Receptor Age:
Child
EPC
Cancer Risk Calculations
Non-Cancer Hazard Calculations
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Exposure Route
Chemical of Potential Concern
Value
Units
Intake/Exposure Concentration
CSF/Unit Risk
Cancer
Intake/Exposure Concentration
RfD/RfC
Hazard
Value
Units
Value
Units
Risk 111
Value
Units
Value
Units
Quotient(1>
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Ingestion
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
5.10E-04
mg/L
(2)
2.54E-05
mg/kg-day
1.00E-02
mg/kg-day
0.003
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
1.60E-05
mg/L
(2)
7.98E-07
mg/kg-day
3.00E-06
mg/kg-day
0.3
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
1.50E-04
mg/L
(2)
7.48E-06
mg/kg-day
2.00E-06
mg/kg-day
4
Cyanide
Cyanide
3.20E-03
mg/L
(2)
1.60E-04
mg/kg-day
6.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.3
Metals (Total)
Cadmium (Water)
3.30E-04
mg/L
(2)
1.65E-05
mg/kg-day
1.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.2
Cobalt
1.30E-02
mg/L
(2)
6.48E-04
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
2
Manganese
1.80E-01
mg/L
(2)
8.98E-03
mg/kg-day
2.40E-02
mg/kg-day
0.4
Exp. Route Total
7
Dermal
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
5.10E-04
mg/L
(2)
2.02E-06
mg/kg-day
1.00E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0002
Cyanide
Cyanide
3.20E-03
mg/L
(2)
1.09E-06
mg/kg-day
6.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.002
Metals (Total)
Cadmium (Water)
3.30E-04
mg/L
(2)
7.25E-08
mg/kg-day
5.00E-06
mg/kg-day
0.01
Cobalt
1.30E-02
mg/L
(2)
1.14E-06
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.004
Manganese
1.80E-01
mg/L
(2)
-
3.96E-05
mg/kg-day
9.60E-04
mg/kg-day
0.04
Exp. Route Total
0.06
Exp. Point Total
7
Exp. Medium Total
7
Medium Total
7
Notes:
Total of Receptor Risks Across All Media
Total of Receptor Hazards Across All Media
7
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
(2) Cancer risk is only presented for the lifetime receptor, whereas non-cancer hazard is calculated separately for the child and adult receptor.
-------
Table A7-20
Calculation of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0197)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe:
Current/Future
Receptor Population:
On-Site Resident
Receptor Age:
Adult
EPC
Cancer Risk Calculations
Non-Cancer Hazard Calculations
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Exposure Route
Chemical of Potential Concern
Value
Units
Intake/Exposure Concentration
CSF/Unit Risk
Cancer
Intake/Exposure Concentration
RfD/RfC
Hazard
Value
Units
Value
Units
Risk 111
Value
Units
Value
Units
Quotient(1>
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Ingestion
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
5.10E-04
mg/L
(2)
1.53E-05
mg/kg-day
1.00E-02
mg/kg-day
0.002
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
1.60E-05
mg/L
(2)
4.79E-07
mg/kg-day
3.00E-06
mg/kg-day
0.2
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
1.50E-04
mg/L
(2)
4.49E-06
mg/kg-day
2.00E-06
mg/kg-day
2
Cyanide
Cyanide
3.20E-03
mg/L
(2)
9.59E-05
mg/kg-day
6.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.2
Metals (Total)
Cadmium (Water)
3.30E-04
mg/L
(2)
9.89E-06
mg/kg-day
1.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.1
Cobalt
1.30E-02
mg/L
(2)
3.90E-04
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
1
Manganese
1.80E-01
mg/L
(2)
5.39E-03
mg/kg-day
2.40E-02
mg/kg-day
0.2
Exp. Route Total
4
Dermal
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
5.10E-04
mg/L
(2)
1.34E-06
mg/kg-day
1.00E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0001
Cyanide
Cyanide
3.20E-03
mg/L
(2)
7.56E-07
mg/kg-day
6.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.001
Metals (Total)
Cadmium (Water)
3.30E-04
mg/L
(2)
5.52E-08
mg/kg-day
5.00E-06
mg/kg-day
0.01
Cobalt
1.30E-02
mg/L
(2)
8.70E-07
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.003
Manganese
1.80E-01
mg/L
(2)
-
3.01E-05
mg/kg-day
9.60E-04
mg/kg-day
0.03
Exp. Route Total
0.05
Exp. Point Total
4
Exp. Medium Total
4
Indoor Air
Shower/Bath (Vapors)
Inhalation
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
4.09E-05
jjg/m3
(2)
-
5.38E-04
jjg/m3
9.77E+01
jjg/m3
0.000006
Cyanide
Cyanide
1.83E-04
jjg/m3
(2)
2.41E-03
jjg/m3
8.00E-01
jjg/m3
0.003
Exp. Route Total
0.003
Exp. Point Total
0.003
Exp. Medium Total
0.003
Medium Total
4
Notes:
Total of Receptor Risks Across All Media
Total of Receptor Hazards Across All Media
4
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
(2) Cancer risk is only presented for the lifetime receptor, whereas non-cancer hazard is calculated separately for the child and adult receptor.
-------
Table A7-21
Calculation of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0197)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe:
Current/Future
Receptor Population:
On-Site Resident
Receptor Age:
Lifetime
EPC
Cancer Risk Calculations
Non-Cancer Hazard Calculations
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Exposure Route
Chemical of Potential Concern
Value
Units
Intake/Exposure Concentration
CSF/Unit Risk
Cancer
Intake/Exposure Concentration
RfD/RfC
Hazard
Value
Units
Value
Units
Risk111
Value
Units
Value
Units
Quotient(1>
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Ingestion
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
5.10E-04
mg/L
6.55E-06
mg/kg-day
3.10E-02
1/(mg/kg-day)
2E-07
(2)
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
1.60E-05
mg/L
2.05E-07
mg/kg-day
7.00E-02
1/(mg/kg-day)
1E-08
(2)
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
1.50E-04
mg/L
1.93E-06
mg/kg-day
(2)
Cyanide
Cyanide
3.20E-03
mg/L
4.11E-05
mg/kg-day
(2)
Metals (Total)
Cadmium (Water)
3.30E-04
mg/L
4.24E-06
mg/kg-day
(2)
Cobalt
1.30E-02
mg/L
1.67E-04
mg/kg-day
(2)
Manganese
1.80E-01
mg/L
2.31E-03
mg/kg-day
-
(2)
Exp. Route Total
2E-07
Dermal
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
5.10E-04
mg/L
5.64E-07
mg/kg-day
3.10E-02
1/(mg/kg-day)
2E-08
(2)
-
Cyanide
Cyanide
3.20E-03
mg/L
3.15E-07
mg/kg-day
(2)
Metals (Total)
Cadmium (Water)
3.30E-04
mg/L
2.26E-08
mg/kg-day
(2)
Cobalt
1.30E-02
mg/L
3.56E-07
mg/kg-day
(2)
Manganese
1.80E-01
mg/L
1.23E-05
mg/kg-day
(2)
Exp. Route Total
2E-08
Exp. Point Total
2E-07
Exp. Medium Total
2E-07
Indoor Air
Shower/Bath (Vapors)
Inhalation
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
4.09E-05
[jg'm3
1.54E-04
[jg'm3
2.30E-05
m3/|jg
4E-09
(2)
Cyanide
Cyanide
1.83E-04
[jg'm3
6.88E-04
[jg'm3
(2)
Exp. Route Total
4E-09
Exp. Point Total
4E-09
Exp. Medium Total
4E-09
Medium Total
2E-07
Notes:
Total of Receptor Risks Across All Media
2E-07
Total of Receptor Hazards Across All Media
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
(2) Cancer risk is only presented for the lifetime receptor, whereas non-cancer hazard is calculated separately for the child and adult receptor.
-------
Table A7-22
Calculation of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0212)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe:
Current/Future
Receptor Population:
On-Site Resident
Receptor Age:
Child
EPC
Cancer Risk Calculations
Non-Cancer Hazard Calculations
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Exposure Route
Chemical of Potential Concern
Value
Units
Intake/Exposure Concentration
CSF/Unit Risk
Cancer
Intake/Exposure Concentration
RfD/RfC
Hazard
Value
Units
Value
Units
Risk 111
Value
Units
Value
Units
Quotient(1>
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Ingestion
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
2.80E-04
mg/L
(2)
1.40E-05
mg/kg-day
1.00E-02
mg/kg-day
0.001
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
1.10E-05
mg/L
(2)
5.48E-07
mg/kg-day
3.00E-06
mg/kg-day
0.2
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
5.70E-05
mg/L
(2)
2.84E-06
mg/kg-day
2.00E-06
mg/kg-day
1
Metals (Total)
Cobalt
1.60E-03
mg/L
(2)
7.98E-05
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.3
Copper
2.90E-01
mg/L
(2)
1.45E-02
mg/kg-day
4.00E-02
mg/kg-day
0.4
Exp. Route Total
2
Dermal
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
2.80E-04
mg/L
(2)
1.11E-06
mg/kg-day
1.00E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0001
Metals (Total)
Cobalt
1.60E-03
mg/L
(2)
1.41E-07
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0005
Copper
2.90E-01
mg/L
(2)
6.37E-05
mg/kg-day
4.00E-02
mg/kg-day
0.002
Exp. Route Total
0.002
Exp. Point Total
2
Exp. Medium Total
2
Medium Total
2
Notes:
Total of Receptor Risks Across All Media
Total of Receptor Hazards Across All Media
2
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
(2) Cancer risk is only presented for the lifetime receptor, whereas non-cancer hazard is calculated separately for the child and adult receptor.
-------
Table A7-23
Calculation of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0212)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe:
Current/Future
Receptor Population:
On-Site Resident
Receptor Age:
Adult
EPC
Cancer Risk Calculations
Non-Cancer Hazard Calculations
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Exposure Route
Chemical of Potential Concern
Value
Units
Intake/Exposure Concentration
CSF/Unit Risk
Cancer
Intake/Exposure Concentration
RfD/RfC
Hazard
Value
Units
Value
Units
Risk 111
Value
Units
Value
Units
Quotient(1>
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Ingestion
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
2.80E-04
mg/L
(2)
8.39E-06
mg/kg-day
1.00E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0008
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
1.10E-05
mg/L
(2)
3.30E-07
mg/kg-day
3.00E-06
mg/kg-day
0.1
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
5.70E-05
mg/L
(2)
1.71E-06
mg/kg-day
2.00E-06
mg/kg-day
0.9
Metals (Total)
Cobalt
1.60E-03
mg/L
(2)
4.79E-05
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.2
Copper
2.90E-01
mg/L
(2)
8.69E-03
mg/kg-day
4.00E-02
mg/kg-day
0.2
Exp. Route Total
1
Dermal
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
2.80E-04
mg/L
(2)
7.35E-07
mg/kg-day
1.00E-02
mg/kg-day
0.00007
Metals (Total)
Cobalt
1.60E-03
mg/L
(2)
1.07E-07
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0004
Copper
2.90E-01
mg/L
(2)
4.85E-05
mg/kg-day
4.00E-02
mg/kg-day
0.001
Exp. Route Total
0.002
Exp. Point Total
1
Exp. Medium Total
1
Indoor Air
Shower/Bath (Vapors)
Inhalation
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
2.24E-05
jjg/m3
(2)
2.95E-04
jjg/m3
9.77E+01
jjg/m3
0.000003
Exp. Route Total
0.000003
Exp. Point Total
0.000003
Exp. Medium Total
0.000003
Medium Total
1
Notes:
Total of Receptor Risks Across All Media
Total of Receptor Hazards Across All Media
1
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
(2) Cancer risk is only presented for the lifetime receptor, whereas non-cancer hazard is calculated separately for the child and adult receptor.
-------
Table A7-24
Calculation of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0212)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe:
Current/Future
Receptor Population:
On-Site Resident
Receptor Age:
Lifetime
EPC
Cancer Risk Calculations
Non-Cancer Hazard Calculations
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Exposure Route
Chemical of Potential Concern
Value
Units
Intake/Exposure Concentration
CSF/Unit Risk
Cancer
Intake/Exposure Concentration
RfD/RfC
Hazard
Value
Units
Value
Units
Risk111
Value
Units
Value
Units
Quotient(1>
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Ingestion
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
2.80E-04
mg/L
3.59E-06
mg/kg-day
3.10E-02
1/(mg/kg-day)
1E-07
(2)
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
1.10E-05
mg/L
1.41E-07
mg/kg-day
7.00E-02
1/(mg/kg-day)
1E-08
(2)
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
5.70E-05
mg/L
7.32E-07
mg/kg-day
(2)
Metals (Total)
Cobalt
1.60E-03
mg/L
2.05E-05
mg/kg-day
(2)
Copper
2.90E-01
mg/L
3.72E-03
mg/kg-day
(2)
Exp. Route Total
1E-07
Dermal
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
2.80E-04
mg/L
3.10E-07
mg/kg-day
3.10E-02
1/(mg/kg-day)
1E-08
(2)
Metals (Total)
Cobalt
1.60E-03
mg/L
4.39E-08
mg/kg-day
-
(2)
Copper
2.90E-01
mg/L
1.99E-05
mg/kg-day
(2)
-
Exp. Route Total
1E-08
Exp. Point Total
1E-07
Exp. Medium Total
1E-07
Indoor Air
Shower/Bath (Vapors)
Inhalation
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
2.24E-05
Ijg'm3
8.44E-05
Ijg'm3
2.30E-05
m3/jj g
2E-09
(2)
Exp. Route Total
2E-09
Exp. Point Total
2E-09
Exp. Medium Total
2E-09
Medium Total
1E-07
Notes:
Total of Receptor Risks Across All Media
1E-07
Total of Receptor Hazards Across All Media
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
(2) Cancer risk is only presented for the lifetime receptor, whereas non-cancer hazard is calculated separately for the child and adult receptor.
-------
Table A7-25
Calculation of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0275)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe:
Current/Future
Receptor Population:
On-Site Resident
Receptor Age:
Child
EPC
Cancer Risk Calculations
Non-Cancer Hazard Calculations
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Exposure Route
Chemical of Potential Concern
Value
Units
Intake/Exposure Concentration
CSF/Unit Risk
Cancer
Intake/Exposure Concentration
RfD/RfC
Hazard
Value
Units
Value
Units
Risk 111
Value
Units
Value
Units
Quotient(1>
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Ingestion
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
7.40E-06
mg/L
(2)
3.69E-07
mg/kg-day
3.00E-06
mg/kg-day
0.1
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
6.00E-05
mg/L
(2)
2.99E-06
mg/kg-day
2.00E-06
mg/kg-day
1
Metals (Total)
Cadmium (Water)
2.00E-04
mg/L
(2)
9.97E-06
mg/kg-day
1.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.1
Cobalt
1.80E-03
mg/L
(2)
8.98E-05
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.3
Iron
2.90E+00
mg/L
(2)
1.45E-01
mg/kg-day
7.00E-01
mg/kg-day
0.2
Manganese
5.60E-02
mg/L
(2)
2.79E-03
mg/kg-day
2.40E-02
mg/kg-day
0.1
Exp. Route Total
2
Dermal
Metals (Total)
Cadmium (Water)
2.00E-04
mg/L
(2)
4.39E-08
mg/kg-day
5.00E-06
mg/kg-day
0.009
Cobalt
1.80E-03
mg/L
(2)
1.58E-07
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0005
Iron
2.90E+00
mg/L
(2)
6.37E-04
mg/kg-day
7.00E-01
mg/kg-day
0.0009
Manganese
5.60E-02
mg/L
(2)
1.23E-05
mg/kg-day
9.60E-04
mg/kg-day
0.01
Exp. Route Total
0.02
Exp. Point Total
2
Exp. Medium Total
2
Medium Total
2
Notes:
Total of Receptor Risks Across All Media
Total of Receptor Hazards Across All Media
2
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
(2) Cancer risk is only presented for the lifetime receptor, whereas non-cancer hazard is calculated separately for the child and adult receptor.
-------
Table A7-26
Calculation of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0275)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe:
Current/Future
Receptor Population:
On-Site Resident
Receptor Age:
Adult
EPC
Cancer Risk Calculations
Non-Cancer Hazard Calculations
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Exposure Route
Chemical of Potential Concern
Value
Units
Intake/Exposure Concentration
CSF/Unit Risk
Cancer
Intake/Exposure Concentration
RfD/RfC
Hazard
Value
Units
Value
Units
Risk 111
Value
Units
Value
Units
Quotient(1>
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Ingestion
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
7.40E-06
mg/L
(2)
2.22E-07
mg/kg-day
3.00E-06
mg/kg-day
0.07
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
6.00E-05
mg/L
(2)
1.80E-06
mg/kg-day
2.00E-06
mg/kg-day
0.9
Metals (Total)
Cadmium (Water)
2.00E-04
mg/L
(2)
5.99E-06
mg/kg-day
1.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.06
Cobalt
1.80E-03
mg/L
(2)
5.39E-05
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.2
Iron
2.90E+00
mg/L
(2)
8.69E-02
mg/kg-day
7.00E-01
mg/kg-day
0.1
Manganese
5.60E-02
mg/L
(2)
1.68E-03
mg/kg-day
2.40E-02
mg/kg-day
0.07
Exp. Route Total
1
Dermal
Metals (Total)
Cadmium (Water)
2.00E-04
mg/L
(2)
3.34E-08
mg/kg-day
5.00E-06
mg/kg-day
0.007
Cobalt
1.80E-03
mg/L
(2)
1.20E-07
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.0004
Iron
2.90E+00
mg/L
(2)
4.85E-04
mg/kg-day
7.00E-01
mg/kg-day
0.0007
Manganese
5.60E-02
mg/L
(2)
9.37E-06
mg/kg-day
9.60E-04
mg/kg-day
0.01
Exp. Route Total
0.02
Exp. Point Total
1
Exp. Medium Total
1
Medium Total
1
Notes:
Total of Receptor Risks Across All Media
Total of Receptor Hazards Across All Media
1
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
(2) Cancer risk is only presented for the lifetime receptor, whereas non-cancer hazard is calculated separately for the child and adult receptor.
-------
Table A7-27
Calculation of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0275)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe:
Current/Future
Receptor Population:
On-Site Resident
Receptor Age:
Lifetime
EPC
Cancer Risk Calculations
Non-Cancer Hazard Calculations
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Exposure Route
Chemical of Potential Concern
Value
Units
Intake/Exposure Concentration
CSF/Unit Risk
Cancer
Intake/Exposure Concentration
RfD/RfC
Hazard
Value
Units
Value
Units
Risk111
Value
Units
Value
Units
Quotient(1>
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Ingestion
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
7.40E-06
mg/L
9.50E-08
mg/kg-day
7.00E-02
1/(mg/kg-day)
7E-09
(2)
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
6.00E-05
mg/L
7.70E-07
mg/kg-day
(2)
Metals (Total)
Cadmium (Water)
2.00E-04
mg/L
2.57E-06
mg/kg-day
(2)
Cobalt
1.80E-03
mg/L
2.31E-05
mg/kg-day
(2)
Iron
2.90E+00
mg/L
3.72E-02
mg/kg-day
(2)
Manganese
5.60E-02
mg/L
7.19E-04
mg/kg-day
-
(2)
Exp. Route Total
7E-09
Dermal
Metals (Total)
Cadmium (Water)
Cobalt
Iron
Manganese
2.00E-04
1.80E-03
2.90E+00
5.60E-02
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
1.37E-08
4.93E-08
1.99E-04
3.84E-06
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
-
Exp. Route Total
Exp. Point Total
7E-09
Exp. Medium Total
7E-09
Medium Total
7E-09
Notes:
Total of Receptor Risks Across All Media
7E-09
Total of Receptor Hazards Across All Media
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
(2) Cancer risk is only presented for the lifetime receptor, whereas non-cancer hazard is calculated separately for the child and adult receptor.
-------
Table A7-28
Calculation of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0500)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe:
Current/Future
Receptor Population:
On-Site Resident
Receptor Age:
Child
EPC
Cancer Risk Calculations
Non-Cancer Hazard Calculations
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Exposure Route
Chemical of Potential Concern
Value
Units
Intake/Exposure Concentration
CSF/Unit Risk
Cancer
Intake/Exposure Concentration
RfD/RfC
Hazard
Value
Units
Value
Units
Risk 111
Value
Units
Value
Units
Quotient(1>
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Ingestion
Metals (Total)
Barium
6.90E-01
mg/L
(2)
3.44E-02
mg/kg-day
2.00E-01
mg/kg-day
0.2
Beryllium
3.60E-03
mg/L
(2)
1.80E-04
mg/kg-day
2.00E-03
mg/kg-day
0.09
Cadmium (Water)
4.40E-04
mg/L
(2)
2.19E-05
mg/kg-day
1.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.2
Cobalt
2.60E-02
mg/L
(2)
1.30E-03
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
4
Manganese
1.80E-01
mg/L
(2)
8.98E-03
mg/kg-day
2.40E-02
mg/kg-day
0.4
Exp. Route Total
5
Dermal
Metals (Total)
Barium
6.90E-01
mg/L
(2)
1.52E-04
mg/kg-day
1.40E-02
mg/kg-day
0.01
Beryllium
3.60E-03
mg/L
(2)
7.91E-07
mg/kg-day
1.40E-05
mg/kg-day
0.06
Cadmium (Water)
4.40E-04
mg/L
(2)
9.67E-08
mg/kg-day
5.00E-06
mg/kg-day
0.02
Cobalt
2.60E-02
mg/L
(2)
2.29E-06
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.008
Manganese
1.80E-01
mg/L
(2)
3.96E-05
mg/kg-day
9.60E-04
mg/kg-day
0.04
Exp. Route Total
0.1
Exp. Point Total
5
Exp. Medium Total
5
Medium Total
5
Notes:
Total of Receptor Risks Across All Media
Total of Receptor Hazards Across All Media
5
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
(2) Cancer risk is only presented for the lifetime receptor, whereas non-cancer hazard is calculated separately for the child and adult receptor.
-------
Table A7-29
Calculation of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0500)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe:
Current/Future
Receptor Population:
On-Site Resident
Receptor Age:
Adult
EPC
Cancer Risk Calculations
Non-Cancer Hazard Calculations
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Exposure Route
Chemical of Potential Concern
Value
Units
Intake/Exposure Concentration
CSF/Unit Risk
Cancer
Intake/Exposure Concentration
RfD/RfC
Hazard
Value
Units
Value
Units
Risk 111
Value
Units
Value
Units
Quotient(1>
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Ingestion
Metals (Total)
Barium
6.90E-01
mg/L
(2)
2.07E-02
mg/kg-day
2.00E-01
mg/kg-day
0.1
Beryllium
3.60E-03
mg/L
(2)
1.08E-04
mg/kg-day
2.00E-03
mg/kg-day
0.05
Cadmium (Water)
4.40E-04
mg/L
(2)
1.32E-05
mg/kg-day
1.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.1
Cobalt
2.60E-02
mg/L
(2)
7.79E-04
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
3
Manganese
1.80E-01
mg/L
(2)
5.39E-03
mg/kg-day
2.40E-02
mg/kg-day
0.2
Exp. Route Total
3
Dermal
Metals (Total)
Barium
6.90E-01
mg/L
(2)
1.15E-04
mg/kg-day
1.40E-02
mg/kg-day
0.008
Beryllium
3.60E-03
mg/L
(2)
6.02E-07
mg/kg-day
1.40E-05
mg/kg-day
0.04
Cadmium (Water)
4.40E-04
mg/L
(2)
7.36E-08
mg/kg-day
5.00E-06
mg/kg-day
0.01
Cobalt
2.60E-02
mg/L
(2)
1.74E-06
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.006
Manganese
1.80E-01
mg/L
(2)
3.01E-05
mg/kg-day
9.60E-04
mg/kg-day
0.03
Exp. Route Total
0.1
Exp. Point Total
3
Exp. Medium Total
3
Medium Total
3
Notes:
Total of Receptor Risks Across All Media
Total of Receptor Hazards Across All Media
3
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
(2) Cancer risk is only presented for the lifetime receptor, whereas non-cancer hazard is calculated separately for the child and adult receptor.
-------
Table A7-30
Calculation of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0500)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe:
Current/Future
Receptor Population:
On-Site Resident
Receptor Age:
Lifetime
EPC
Cancer Risk Calculations
Non-Cancer Hazard Calculations
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Exposure Route
Chemical of Potential Concern
Value
Units
Intake/Exposure Concentration
CSF/Unit Risk
Cancer
Intake/Exposure Concentration
RfD/RfC
Hazard
Value
Units
Value
Units
Risk111
Value
Units
Value
Units
Quotient(1>
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Ingestion
Metals (Total)
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium (Water)
Cobalt
Manganese
6.90E-01
3.60E-03
4.40E-04
2.60E-02
1.80E-01
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
8.86E-03
4.62E-05
5.65E-06
3.34E-04
2.31E-03
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
Exp. Route Total
Dermal
Metals (Total)
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium (Water)
Cobalt
Manganese
6.90E-01
3.60E-03
4.40E-04
2.60E-02
1.80E-01
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
4.73E-05
2.47E-07
3.02E-08
7.13E-07
1.23E-05
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
-
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
-
Exp. Route Total
Exp. Point Total
Exp. Medium Total
Medium Total
Notes:
Total of Receptor Risks Across All Media
Total of Receptor Hazards Across All Media
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
(2) Cancer risk is only presented for the lifetime receptor, whereas non-cancer hazard is calculated separately for the child and adult receptor.
-------
Table A7-31
Calculation of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0501)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe:
Current/Future
Receptor Population:
On-Site Resident
Receptor Age:
Child
EPC
Cancer Risk Calculations
Non-Cancer Hazard Calculations
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Exposure Route
Chemical of Potential Concern
Value
Units
Intake/Exposure Concentration
CSF/Unit Risk
Cancer
Intake/Exposure Concentration
RfD/RfC
Hazard
Value
Units
Value
Units
Risk 111
Value
Units
Value
Units
Quotient(1>
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Ingestion
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
9.60E-04
mg/L
(2)
4.79E-05
mg/kg-day
1.00E-02
mg/kg-day
0.005
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
1.70E-05
mg/L
(2)
8.48E-07
mg/kg-day
3.00E-06
mg/kg-day
0.3
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
1.30E-04
mg/L
(2)
6.48E-06
mg/kg-day
2.00E-06
mg/kg-day
3
Metals (Total)
Cobalt
1.60E-02
mg/L
(2)
7.98E-04
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
3
Manganese
2.60E-01
mg/L
(2)
1.30E-02
mg/kg-day
2.40E-02
mg/kg-day
0.5
Exp. Route Total
7
Dermal
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
9.60E-04
mg/L
(2)
3.79E-06
mg/kg-day
1.00E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0004
Metals (Total)
Cobalt
1.60E-02
mg/L
(2)
1.41E-06
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.005
Manganese
2.60E-01
mg/L
(2)
5.71E-05
mg/kg-day
9.60E-04
mg/kg-day
0.06
Exp. Route Total
0.06
Exp. Point Total
7
Exp. Medium Total
7
Medium Total
7
Notes:
Total of Receptor Risks Across All Media
Total of Receptor Hazards Across All Media
7
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
(2) Cancer risk is only presented for the lifetime receptor, whereas non-cancer hazard is calculated separately for the child and adult receptor.
-------
Table A7-32
Calculation of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0501)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe:
Current/Future
Receptor Population:
On-Site Resident
Receptor Age:
Adult
EPC
Cancer Risk Calculations
Non-Cancer Hazard Calculations
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Exposure Route
Chemical of Potential Concern
Value
Units
Intake/Exposure Concentration
CSF/Unit Risk
Cancer
Intake/Exposure Concentration
RfD/RfC
Hazard
Value
Units
Value
Units
Risk 111
Value
Units
Value
Units
Quotient(1>
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Ingestion
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
9.60E-04
mg/L
(2)
2.88E-05
mg/kg-day
1.00E-02
mg/kg-day
0.003
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
1.70E-05
mg/L
(2)
5.09E-07
mg/kg-day
3.00E-06
mg/kg-day
0.2
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
1.30E-04
mg/L
(2)
3.90E-06
mg/kg-day
2.00E-06
mg/kg-day
2
Metals (Total)
Cobalt
1.60E-02
mg/L
(2)
4.79E-04
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
2
Manganese
2.60E-01
mg/L
(2)
7.79E-03
mg/kg-day
2.40E-02
mg/kg-day
0.3
Exp. Route Total
4
Dermal
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
9.60E-04
mg/L
(2)
2.52E-06
mg/kg-day
1.00E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0003
Metals (Total)
Cobalt
1.60E-02
mg/L
(2)
1.07E-06
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.004
Manganese
2.60E-01
mg/L
(2)
4.35E-05
mg/kg-day
9.60E-04
mg/kg-day
0.05
Exp. Route Total
0.05
Exp. Point Total
4
Exp. Medium Total
4
Indoor Air
Shower/Bath (Vapors)
Inhalation
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
7.69E-05
jjg/m3
(2)
1.01E-03
jjg/m3
9.77E+01
jjg/m3
0.00001
Exp. Route Total
0.00001
Exp. Point Total
0.00001
Exp. Medium Total
0.00001
Medium Total
4
Notes:
Total of Receptor Risks Across All Media
Total of Receptor Hazards Across All Media
4
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
(2) Cancer risk is only presented for the lifetime receptor, whereas non-cancer hazard is calculated separately for the child and adult receptor.
-------
Table A7-33
Calculation of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0501)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe:
Current/Future
Receptor Population:
On-Site Resident
Receptor Age:
Lifetime
EPC
Cancer Risk Calculations
Non-Cancer Hazard Calculations
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Exposure Route
Chemical of Potential Concern
Value
Units
Intake/Exposure Concentration
CSF/Unit Risk
Cancer
Intake/Exposure Concentration
RfD/RfC
Hazard
Value
Units
Value
Units
Risk111
Value
Units
Value
Units
Quotient(1>
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Ingestion
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
9.60E-04
mg/L
1.23E-05
mg/kg-day
3.10E-02
1/(mg/kg-day)
4E-07
(2)
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
1.70E-05
mg/L
2.18E-07
mg/kg-day
7.00E-02
1/(mg/kg-day)
2E-08
(2)
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
1.30E-04
mg/L
1.67E-06
mg/kg-day
(2)
Metals (Total)
Cobalt
1.60E-02
mg/L
2.05E-04
mg/kg-day
(2)
Manganese
2.60E-01
mg/L
3.34E-03
mg/kg-day
(2)
Exp. Route Total
4E-07
Dermal
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
9.60E-04
mg/L
1.06E-06
mg/kg-day
3.10E-02
1/(mg/kg-day)
3E-08
(2)
Metals (Total)
Cobalt
1.60E-02
mg/L
4.39E-07
mg/kg-day
-
(2)
Manganese
2.60E-01
mg/L
1.78E-05
mg/kg-day
(2)
-
Exp. Route Total
3E-08
Exp. Point Total
4E-07
Exp. Medium Total
4E-07
Indoor Air
Shower/Bath (Vapors)
Inhalation
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
7.69E-05
Ijg'm3
2.89E-04
Ijg'm3
2.30E-05
m3/jj g
7E-09
(2)
Exp. Route Total
7E-09
Exp. Point Total
7E-09
Exp. Medium Total
7E-09
Medium Total
4E-07
Notes:
Total of Receptor Risks Across All Media
4E-07
Total of Receptor Hazards Across All Media
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
(2) Cancer risk is only presented for the lifetime receptor, whereas non-cancer hazard is calculated separately for the child and adult receptor.
-------
Table A7-34
Calculation of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0510)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe:
Current/Future
Receptor Population:
On-Site Resident
Receptor Age:
Child
EPC
Cancer Risk Calculations
Non-Cancer Hazard Calculations
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Exposure Route
Chemical of Potential Concern
Value
Units
Intake/Exposure Concentration
CSF/Unit Risk
Cancer
Intake/Exposure Concentration
RfD/RfC
Hazard
Value
Units
Value
Units
Risk 111
Value
Units
Value
Units
Quotient(1>
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Ingestion
Cyanide
Cyanide
1.10E-02
mg/L
(2)
5.48E-04
mg/kg-day
6.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.9
Metals (Total)
Barium
1.30E+00
mg/L
(2)
6.48E-02
mg/kg-day
2.00E-01
mg/kg-day
0.3
Cadmium (Water)
3.90E-04
mg/L
(2)
1.94E-05
mg/kg-day
1.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.2
Cobalt
2.00E-02
mg/L
(2)
9.97E-04
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
3
Copper
1.00E-01
mg/L
(2)
4.99E-03
mg/kg-day
4.00E-02
mg/kg-day
0.1
Manganese
1.40E-01
mg/L
(2)
6.98E-03
mg/kg-day
2.40E-02
mg/kg-day
0.3
Exp. Route Total
5
Dermal
Cyanide
Cyanide
1.10E-02
mg/L
(2)
3.73E-06
mg/kg-day
6.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.006
Metals (Total)
Barium
1.30E+00
mg/L
(2)
2.86E-04
mg/kg-day
1.40E-02
mg/kg-day
0.02
Cadmium (Water)
3.90E-04
mg/L
(2)
8.57E-08
mg/kg-day
5.00E-06
mg/kg-day
0.02
Cobalt
2.00E-02
mg/L
(2)
1.76E-06
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.006
Copper
1.00E-01
mg/L
(2)
-
2.20E-05
mg/kg-day
4.00E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0005
Manganese
1.40E-01
mg/L
(2)
-
3.08E-05
mg/kg-day
9.60E-04
mg/kg-day
0.03
Exp. Route Total
0.08
Exp. Point Total
5
Exp. Medium Total
5
Medium Total
5
Notes:
Total of Receptor Risks Across All Media
Total of Receptor Hazards Across All Media
5
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
(2) Cancer risk is only presented for the lifetime receptor, whereas non-cancer hazard is calculated separately for the child and adult receptor.
-------
Table A7-35
Calculation of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0510)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe:
Current/Future
Receptor Population:
On-Site Resident
Receptor Age:
Adult
EPC
Cancer Risk Calculations
Non-Cancer Hazard Calculations
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Exposure Route
Chemical of Potential Concern
Value
Units
Intake/Exposure Concentration
CSF/Unit Risk
Cancer
Intake/Exposure Concentration
RfD/RfC
Hazard
Value
Units
Value
Units
Risk 111
Value
Units
Value
Units
Quotient(1>
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Ingestion
Cyanide
Cyanide
1.10E-02
mg/L
(2)
3.30E-04
mg/kg-day
6.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.5
Metals (Total)
Barium
1.30E+00
mg/L
(2)
3.90E-02
mg/kg-day
2.00E-01
mg/kg-day
0.2
Cadmium (Water)
3.90E-04
mg/L
(2)
1.17E-05
mg/kg-day
1.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.1
Cobalt
2.00E-02
mg/L
(2)
5.99E-04
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
2
Copper
1.00E-01
mg/L
(2)
3.00E-03
mg/kg-day
4.00E-02
mg/kg-day
0.07
Manganese
1.40E-01
mg/L
(2)
4.20E-03
mg/kg-day
2.40E-02
mg/kg-day
0.2
Exp. Route Total
3
Dermal
Cyanide
Cyanide
1.10E-02
mg/L
(2)
2.60E-06
mg/kg-day
6.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.004
Metals (Total)
Barium
1.30E+00
mg/L
(2)
2.17E-04
mg/kg-day
1.40E-02
mg/kg-day
0.02
Cadmium (Water)
3.90E-04
mg/L
(2)
6.52E-08
mg/kg-day
5.00E-06
mg/kg-day
0.01
Cobalt
2.00E-02
mg/L
(2)
1.34E-06
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.004
Copper
1.00E-01
mg/L
(2)
1.67E-05
mg/kg-day
4.00E-02
mg/kg-day
0.0004
Manganese
1.40E-01
mg/L
(2)
2.34E-05
mg/kg-day
9.60E-04
mg/kg-day
0.02
Exp. Route Total
0.06
Exp. Point Total
3
Exp. Medium Total
3
Indoor Air
Shower/Bath (Vapors)
Inhalation
Cyanide
Cyanide
6.29E-04
jjg/m3
(2)
8.28E-03
jjg/m3
8.00E-01
jjg/m3
0.01
Exp. Route Total
0.01
Exp. Point Total
0.01
Exp. Medium Total
0.01
Medium Total
3
Notes:
Total of Receptor Risks Across All Media
Total of Receptor Hazards Across All Media
3
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
(2) Cancer risk is only presented for the lifetime receptor, whereas non-cancer hazard is calculated separately for the child and adult receptor.
-------
Table A7-36
Calculation of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0510)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe:
Current/Future
Receptor Population:
On-Site Resident
Receptor Age:
Lifetime
EPC
Cancer Risk Calculations
Non-Cancer Hazard Calculations
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Exposure Route
Chemical of Potential Concern
Value
Units
Intake/Exposure Concentration
CSF/Unit Risk
Cancer
Intake/Exposure Concentration
RfD/RfC
Hazard
Value
Units
Value
Units
Risk111
Value
Units
Value
Units
Quotient(1>
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Ingestion
Cyanide
Cyanide
Metals (Total)
Barium
Cadmium (Water)
Cobalt
Copper
Manganese
1.10E-02
1.30E+00
3.90E-04
2.00E-02
1.00E-01
1.40E-01
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
1.41E-04
1.67E-02
5.01E-06
2.57E-04
1.28E-03
1.80E-03
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
Exp. Route Total
Dermal
Cyanide
Cyanide
Metals (Total)
Barium
Cadmium (Water)
Cobalt
Copper
Manganese
1.10E-02
1.30E+00
3.90E-04
2.00E-02
1.00E-01
1.40E-01
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
1.08E-06
8.91E-05
2.67E-08
5.48E-07
6.85E-06
9.60E-06
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
(2)
-
Exp. Route Total
Exp. Point Total
Exp. Medium Total
Indoor Air
Shower/Bath (Vapors)
Inhalation
Cyanide
Cyanide
6.29E-04
Ijg'm3
2.37E-03
Ijg'm3
(2)
Exp. Route Total
Exp. Point Total
Exp. Medium Total
Medium Total
Notes:
Total of Receptor Risks Across All Media
Total of Receptor Hazards Across All Media
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
(2) Cancer risk is only presented for the lifetime receptor, whereas non-cancer hazard is calculated separately for the child and adult receptor.
-------
Table A7-37
Calculation of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0527)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe:
Current/Future
Receptor Population:
On-Site Resident
Receptor Age:
Child
EPC
Cancer Risk Calculations
Non-Cancer Hazard Calculations
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Exposure Route
Chemical of Potential Concern
Value
Units
Intake/Exposure Concentration
CSF/Unit Risk
Cancer
Intake/Exposure Concentration
RfD/RfC
Hazard
Value
Units
Value
Units
Risk 111
Value
Units
Value
Units
Quotient(1>
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Ingestion
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
6.50E-05
mg/L
(2)
3.24E-06
mg/kg-day
2.00E-06
mg/kg-day
2
Metals (Total)
Cobalt
4.40E-03
mg/L
(2)
2.19E-04
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.7
Manganese
5.60E-02
mg/L
(2)
2.79E-03
mg/kg-day
2.40E-02
mg/kg-day
0.1
Exp. Route Total
2
Dermal
Metals (Total)
Cobalt
4.40E-03
mg/L
(2)
3.87E-07
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.001
Manganese
5.60E-02
mg/L
(2)
1.23E-05
mg/kg-day
9.60E-04
mg/kg-day
0.01
Exp. Route Total
0.01
Exp. Point Total
2
Exp. Medium Total
2
Medium Total
2
Notes:
Total of Receptor Risks Across All Media
Total of Receptor Hazards Across All Media
2
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
(2) Cancer risk is only presented for the lifetime receptor, whereas non-cancer hazard is calculated separately for the child and adult receptor.
-------
Table A7-38
Calculation of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0527)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe:
Current/Future
Receptor Population:
On-Site Resident
Receptor Age:
Adult
EPC
Cancer Risk Calculations
Non-Cancer Hazard Calculations
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Exposure Route
Chemical of Potential Concern
Value
Units
Intake/Exposure Concentration
CSF/Unit Risk
Cancer
Intake/Exposure Concentration
RfD/RfC
Hazard
Value
Units
Value
Units
Risk 111
Value
Units
Value
Units
Quotient(1>
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Ingestion
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
Metals (Total)
6.50E-05
mg/L
(2)
1.95E-06
mg/kg-day
2.00E-06
mg/kg-day
1
Cobalt
4.40E-03
mg/L
(2)
1.32E-04
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.4
Manganese
5.60E-02
mg/L
(2)
1.68E-03
mg/kg-day
2.40E-02
mg/kg-day
0.07
Exp. Route Total
1
Dermal
Metals (Total)
Cobalt
4.40E-03
mg/L
(2)
2.94E-07
mg/kg-day
3.00E-04
mg/kg-day
0.001
Manganese
5.60E-02
mg/L
(2)
9.37E-06
mg/kg-day
9.60E-04
mg/kg-day
0.01
Exp. Route Total
0.01
Exp. Point Total
1
Exp. Medium Total
1
Medium Total
1
Notes:
Total of Receptor Risks Across All Media
Total of Receptor Hazards Across All Media
1
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
(2) Cancer risk is only presented for the lifetime receptor, whereas non-cancer hazard is calculated separately for the child and adult receptor.
-------
Table A7-39
Calculation of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0527)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) - Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe:
Current/Future
Receptor Population:
On-Site Resident
Receptor Age:
Lifetime
EPC
Cancer Risk Calculations
Non-Cancer Hazard Calculations
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Exposure Route
Chemical of Potential Concern
Value
Units
Intake/Exposure Concentration
CSF/Unit Risk
Cancer
Intake/Exposure Concentration
RfD/RfC
Hazard
Value
Units
Value
Units
Risk 111
Value
Units
Value
Units
Quotient(1>
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Ingestion
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
Metals (Total)
Cobalt
Manganese
6.50E-05
4.40E-03
5.60E-02
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
8.34E-07
5.65E-05
7.19E-04
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
(2)
(2)
(2)
Exp. Route Total
Dermal
Metals (Total)
Cobalt
Manganese
4.40E-03
5.60E-02
mg/L
mg/L
1.21E-07
3.84E-06
mg/kg-day
mg/kg-day
(2)
(2)
Exp. Route Total
Exp. Point Total
Exp. Medium Total
Medium Total
Notes:
Total of Receptor Risks Across All Media
Total of Receptor Hazards Across All Media
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
(2) Cancer risk is only presented for the lifetime receptor, whereas non-cancer hazard is calculated separately for the child and adult receptor.
-------
Table A9-1
Summary of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards for COPCs
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0124)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) ¦ Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current/Future
Receptor Population: On-Site Resident
Receptor Age: Child
Thresholds: Chemical-specific (1E-06) and Cumulative (1E-04)
Thresholds: Chemical-specific, Target Organ and Cumulative (HQ > 1)
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Chemical of Potential Concern
Carcinogenic Risk(1)
Non-Carcinogenic Hazard Quotient<1>
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Primary Target Organs
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
Cyanide
Cyanide
Metals (Total)
Barium
Cobalt
Copper
Manganese
DV
RP
NV
EN
Gl
NV
0.3
0.4
0.1
5
0.3
0.4
0.003
0.008
0.009
0.001
0.04
0.3
0.4
0.1
5
0.3
0.4
Chemical Total
6
0.06
7
Exposure Point Total
7
Exposure Medium Total
7
Medium Total
7
Notes:
Receptor Risk Total
Receptor Hazard Index (HI)
7
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
Total Developmental (DV) HI across All Media =
0.3
Total Endocrine (EN) HI across All Media =
5
Total Gastrointestinal (Gl) HI across All Media =
0.3
Total Nervous (NV) HI across All Media =
0.6
Total Reproductive (RP) HI across All Media =
0.4
-------
Table A9-2
Summary of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards for COPCs
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0124)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) ¦ Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current/Future
Receptor Population: On-Site Resident
Receptor Age: Adult
Thresholds: Chemical-specific (1E-06) and Cumulative (1E-04)
Thresholds: Chemical-specific, Target Organ and Cumulative (HQ > 1)
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Chemical of Potential Concern
Carcinogenic Risk(1)
Non-Carcinogenic Hazard Quotient<1>
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Primary Target Organs
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
Cyanide
Cyanide
Metals (Total)
Barium
Cobalt
Copper
Manganese
DV
RP
NV
EN
Gl
NV
0.2
0.2
0.07
3
0.2
0.2
0.002
0.006
0.007
0.001
0.03
0.2
0.2
0.08
3
0.2
0.3
Chemical Total
4
0.05
4
Exposure Point Total
4
Exposure Medium Total
4
Indoor Air
Shower/Bath (Vapors)
Cyanide
Cyanide
EN
0.004
0.004
Chemical Total
0.004
0.004
Exposure Point Total
0.004
Exposure Medium Total
0.004
Medium Total
4
Notes:
Receptor Risk Total
Receptor Hazard Index (HI)
4
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
Total Developmental (DV) HI across All Media =
0.2
Total Endocrine (EN) HI across All Media =
3
Total Gastrointestinal (Gl) HI across All Media =
0.2
Total Nervous (NV) HI across All Media =
0.3
Total Reproductive (RP) HI across All Media =
0.2
-------
Table A9-3
Summary of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards for COPCs
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0124)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) ¦ Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current/Future
Receptor Population: On-Site Resident
Receptor Age: Lifetime
Thresholds: Chemical-specific (1E-06) and Cumulative (1E-04)
Thresholds: Chemical-specific, Target Organ and Cumulative (HQ > 1)
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Chemical of Potential Concern
Carcinogenic Risk(1)
Non-Carcinogenic Hazard Quotient<1>
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Primary Target Organs
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
Cyanide
Cyanide
Metals (Total)
Barium
Cobalt
Copper
Manganese
Chemical Total
Exposure Point Total
Exposure Medium Total
Indoor Air
Shower/Bath (Vapors)
Cyanide
Cyanide
Chemical Total
Exposure Point Total
Exposure Medium Total
Medium Total
Notes:
Receptor Risk Total
Receptor Hazard Index (HI)
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
-------
Table A9-4
Summary of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards for COPCs
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0155)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) ¦ Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current/Future
Receptor Population: On-Site Resident
Receptor Age: Child
Thresholds: Chemical-specific (1E-06) and Cumulative (1E-04)
Thresholds: Chemical-specific, Target Organ and Cumulative (HQ > 1)
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Chemical of Potential Concern
Carcinogenic Risk(1)
Non-Carcinogenic Hazard Quotient<1>
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Primary Target Organs
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Cyanide
Cyanide
Metals (Total)
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium (Water)
Cobalt
Copper
Manganese
RP
DM; HM
NV
UR
EN
Gl
NV
0.4
0.06
0.3
0.2
2
0.2
0.2
0.003
0.0003
0.02
0.01
0.004
0.0008
0.03
0.4
0.06
0.3
0.2
2
0.2
0.3
Chemical Total
4
0.07
4
Exposure Point Total
4
Exposure Medium Total
4
Medium Total
4
Notes:
Receptor Risk Total
Receptor Hazard Index (HI)
4
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
Total Dermal (DM) HI across All Media =
0.06
Total Endocrine (EN) HI across All Media =
2
Total Gastrointestinal (Gl) HI across All Media =
0.2
Total Hematological (HM) HI across All Media =
0.06
Total Nervous (NV) HI across All Media =
0.6
Total Reproductive (RP) HI across All Media =
0.4
Total Urinary (UR) HI across All Media =
0.2
-------
Table A9-5
Summary of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards for COPCs
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0155)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) ¦ Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current/Future
Receptor Population: On-Site Resident
Receptor Age: Adult
Thresholds: Chemical-specific (1E-06) and Cumulative (1E-04)
Thresholds: Chemical-specific, Target Organ and Cumulative (HQ > 1)
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Chemical of Potential Concern
Carcinogenic Risk(1)
Non-Carcinogenic Hazard Quotient<1>
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Primary Target Organs
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Cyanide
Cyanide
Metals (Total)
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium (Water)
Cobalt
Copper
Manganese
RP
DM; HM
NV
UR
EN
Gl
NV
0.2
0.04
0.2
0.1
1
0.1
0.1
0.002
0.0002
0.01
0.01
0.003
0.0006
0.02
0.2
0.04
0.2
0.1
2
0.1
0.2
Chemical Total
2
0.05
2
Exposure Point Total
2
Exposure Medium Total
2
Indoor Air
Shower/Bath (Vapors)
Cyanide
Cyanide
EN
0.005
0.005
Chemical Total
0.005
0.005
Exposure Point Total
0.005
Exposure Medium Total
0.005
Medium Total
2
Notes:
Receptor Risk Total
Receptor Hazard Index (HI)
2
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
Total Dermal (DM) HI across All Media =
0.04
Total Endocrine (EN) HI across All Media =
2
Total Gastrointestinal (Gl) HI across All Media =
0.1
Total Hematological (HM) HI across All Media =
0.04
Total Nervous (NV) HI across All Media =
0.3
Total Reproductive (RP) HI across All Media =
0.2
Total Urinary (UR) HI across All Media =
0.1
-------
Table A9-6
Summary of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards for COPCs
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0155)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) ¦ Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current/Future
Receptor Population: On-Site Resident
Receptor Age: Lifetime
Thresholds: Chemical-specific (1E-06) and Cumulative (1E-04)
Thresholds: Chemical-specific, Target Organ and Cumulative (HQ > 1)
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Chemical of Potential Concern
Carcinogenic Risk(1)
Non-Carcinogenic Hazard Quotient<1>
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Primary Target Organs
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Cyanide
Cyanide
Metals (Total)
Arsenic
Barium
Cadmium (Water)
Cobalt
Copper
Manganese
7E-06
4E-08
7E-06
Chemical Total
7E-06
4E-08
7E-06
Exposure Point Total
7E-06
Exposure Medium Total
7E-06
Indoor Air
Shower/Bath (Vapors)
Cyanide
Cyanide
Chemical Total
Exposure Point Total
Exposure Medium Total
Medium Total
7E-06
Notes:
Receptor Risk Total
7E-06
Receptor Hazard Index (HI)
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
-------
Table A9-7
Summary of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards for COPCs
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0170)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) ¦ Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current/Future
Receptor Population: On-Site Resident
Receptor Age: Child
Thresholds: Chemical-specific (1E-06) and Cumulative (1E-04)
Thresholds: Chemical-specific, Target Organ and Cumulative (HQ > 1)
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Chemical of Potential Concern
Carcinogenic Risk(1)
Non-Carcinogenic Hazard Quotient<1>
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Primary Target Organs
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
Metals (Total)
Chromium, Hexavalent
Cobalt
Nickel
HP
DV
DV
EN
OT
0.007
0.2
6
0.1
1
0.1
0.0006
0.03
0.002
0.003
0.008
0.2
6
0.1
1
0.1
Chemical Total
8
0.04
8
Exposure Point Total
8
Exposure Medium Total
8
Indoor Air
Indoor Air
(Vapor Intrusion)
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
HP
0.002
0.002
Chemical Total
0.002
0.002
Exposure Point Total
0.002
Exposure Medium Total
0.002
Medium Total
8
Notes:
Receptor Risk Total
Receptor Hazard Index (HI)
8
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
Total Developmental (DV) HI across All Media =
7
Total Endocrine (EN) HI across All Media =
1
Total Hepatic (HP) HI across All Media =
0.009
Total Other (OT) HI across All Media =
0.1
-------
Table A9-8
Summary of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards for COPCs
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0170)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) ¦ Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current/Future
Receptor Population: On-Site Resident
Receptor Age: Adult
Thresholds: Chemical-specific (1E-06) and Cumulative (1E-04)
Thresholds: Chemical-specific, Target Organ and Cumulative (HQ > 1)
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Chemical of Potential Concern
Carcinogenic Risk(1)
Non-Carcinogenic Hazard Quotient<1>
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Primary Target Organs
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
Metals (Total)
Chromium, Hexavalent
Cobalt
Nickel
HP
DV
DV
EN
OT
0.004
0.1
4
0.06
0.6
0.08
0.0004
0.03
0.001
0.002
0.005
0.1
4
0.08
0.7
0.08
Chemical Total
5
0.03
5
Exposure Point Total
5
Exposure Medium Total
5
Indoor Air
Shower/Bath (Vapors)
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
HP
0.00002
0.00002
Chemical Total
0.00002
0.00002
Exposure Point Total
0.00002
Exposure Medium Total
0.00002
Indoor Air
(Vapor Intrusion)
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
HP
0.002
0.002
Chemical Total
0.002
0.002
Exposure Point Total
0.002
Exposure Medium Total
0.002
Medium Total
5
Notes:
Receptor Risk Total
Receptor Hazard Index (HI)
5
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
Total Developmental (DV) HI across All Media =
4
Total Endocrine (EN) HI across All Media =
0.7
Total Hepatic (HP) HI across All Media =
0.006
Total Other (OT) HI across All Media =
0.08
-------
Table A9-9
Summary of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards for COPCs
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0170)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) ¦ Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current/Future
Receptor Population: On-Site Resident
Receptor Age: Lifetime
Thresholds: Chemical-specific (1E-06) and Cumulative (1E-04)
Thresholds: Chemical-specific, Target Organ and Cumulative (HQ > 1)
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Chemical of Potential Concern
Carcinogenic Risk(1)
Non-Carcinogenic Hazard Quotient<1>
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Primary Target Organs
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
Metals (Total)
Chromium, Hexavalent
Cobalt
Nickel
6E-07
1E-08
1E-04
5E-08
5E-05
6E-07
1E-08
2E-04
Chemical Total
1E-04
5E-05
2E-04
Exposure Point Total
2E-04
Exposure Medium Total
2E-04
Indoor Air
Shower/Bath (Vapors)
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
1E-08
1E-08
Chemical Total
1E-08
1E-08
Exposure Point Total
1E-08
Exposure Medium Total
1E-08
Indoor Air
(Vapor Intrusion)
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
1E-06
1E-06
Chemical Total
1E-06
1E-06
Exposure Point Total
1E-06
Exposure Medium Total
1E-06
Medium Total
2E-04
Notes:
Receptor Risk Total
2E-04
Receptor Hazard Index (HI)
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
-------
Table A9-10
Summary of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards for COPCs
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0173)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) ¦ Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current/Future
Receptor Population: On-Site Resident
Receptor Age: Child
Thresholds: Chemical-specific (1E-06) and Cumulative (1E-04)
Thresholds: Chemical-specific, Target Organ and Cumulative (HQ > 1)
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Chemical of Potential Concern
Carcinogenic Risk(1)
Non-Carcinogenic Hazard Quotient<1>
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Primary Target Organs
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
Cyanide
Cyanide
Metals (Total)
Barium
Cobalt
Manganese
DV
RP
NV
EN
NV
0.6
0.8
0.1
4
0.5
0.005
0.007
0.006
0.05
0.6
0.8
0.1
4
0.5
Chemical Total
6
0.07
6
Exposure Point Total
6
Exposure Medium Total
6
Medium Total
6
Notes:
Receptor Risk Total
Receptor Hazard Index (HI)
6
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
Total Developmental (DV) HI across All Media =
0.6
Total Endocrine (EN) HI across All Media =
4
Total Nervous (NV) HI across All Media =
0.6
Total Reproductive (RP) HI across All Media =
0.8
-------
Table A9-11
Summary of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards for COPCs
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0173)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) ¦ Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current/Future
Receptor Population: On-Site Resident
Receptor Age: Adult
Thresholds: Chemical-specific (1E-06) and Cumulative (1E-04)
Thresholds: Chemical-specific, Target Organ and Cumulative (HQ > 1)
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Chemical of Potential Concern
Carcinogenic Risk(1)
Non-Carcinogenic Hazard Quotient<1>
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Primary Target Organs
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
Cyanide
Cyanide
Metals (Total)
Barium
Cobalt
Manganese
DV
RP
NV
EN
NV
0.4
0.5
0.06
2
0.3
0.004
0.005
0.005
0.04
0.4
0.5
0.07
2
0.3
Chemical Total
3
0.05
3
Exposure Point Total
3
Exposure Medium Total
3
Indoor Air
Shower/Bath (Vapors)
Cyanide
Cyanide
EN
0.009
0.009
Chemical Total
0.009
0.009
Exposure Point Total
0.009
Exposure Medium Total
0.009
Medium Total
3
Notes:
Receptor Risk Total
Receptor Hazard Index (HI)
3
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
Total Developmental (DV) HI across All Media =
0.4
Total Endocrine (EN) HI across All Media =
2
Total Nervous (NV) HI across All Media =
0.4
Total Reproductive (RP) HI across All Media =
0.5
-------
Table A9-12
Summary of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards for COPCs
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0173)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) ¦ Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current/Future
Receptor Population: On-Site Resident
Receptor Age: Lifetime
Thresholds: Chemical-specific (1E-06) and Cumulative (1E-04)
Thresholds: Chemical-specific, Target Organ and Cumulative (HQ > 1)
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Chemical of Potential Concern
Carcinogenic Risk(1)
Non-Carcinogenic Hazard Quotient<1>
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Primary Target Organs
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
Cyanide
Cyanide
Metals (Total)
Barium
Cobalt
Manganese
Chemical Total
Exposure Point Total
Exposure Medium Total
Indoor Air
Shower/Bath (Vapors)
Cyanide
Cyanide
Chemical Total
Exposure Point Total
Exposure Medium Total
Medium Total
Notes:
Receptor Risk Total
Receptor Hazard Index (HI)
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
-------
Table A9-13
Summary of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards for COPCs
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0176)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) ¦ Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current/Future
Receptor Population: On-Site Resident
Receptor Age: Child
Thresholds: Chemical-specific (1E-06) and Cumulative (1E-04)
Thresholds: Chemical-specific, Target Organ and Cumulative (HQ > 1)
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Chemical of Potential Concern
Carcinogenic Risk(1)
Non-Carcinogenic Hazard Quotient<1>
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Primary Target Organs
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Cyanide
Cyanide
Metals (Total)
Barium
Cadmium (Water)
Cobalt
Manganese
RP
NV
UR
EN
NV
0.7
0.1
0.1
2
0.3
0.005
0.007
0.009
0.004
0.04
0.8
0.1
0.1
2
0.4
Chemical Total
4
0.06
4
Exposure Point Total
4
Exposure Medium Total
4
Medium Total
4
Notes:
Receptor Risk Total
Receptor Hazard Index (HI)
4
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
Total Endocrine (EN) HI across All Media =
2
Total Nervous (NV) HI across All Media =
0.5
Total Reproductive (RP) HI across All Media =
0.8
Total Urinary (UR) HI across All Media =
0.1
-------
Table A9-14
Summary of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards for COPCs
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0176)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) ¦ Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current/Future
Receptor Population: On-Site Resident
Receptor Age: Adult
Thresholds: Chemical-specific (1E-06) and Cumulative (1E-04)
Thresholds: Chemical-specific, Target Organ and Cumulative (HQ > 1)
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Chemical of Potential Concern
Carcinogenic Risk(1)
Non-Carcinogenic Hazard Quotient<1>
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Primary Target Organs
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Cyanide
Cyanide
Metals (Total)
Barium
Cadmium (Water)
Cobalt
Manganese
RP
NV
UR
EN
NV
0.4
0.06
0.06
1
0.2
0.004
0.005
0.007
0.003
0.03
0.5
0.07
0.07
1
0.2
Chemical Total
2
0.05
2
Exposure Point Total
2
Exposure Medium Total
2
Indoor Air
Shower/Bath (Vapors)
Cyanide
Cyanide
EN
0.008
0.008
Chemical Total
0.008
0.008
Exposure Point Total
0.008
Exposure Medium Total
0.008
Medium Total
2
Notes:
Receptor Risk Total
Receptor Hazard Index (HI)
2
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
Total Endocrine (EN) HI across All Media =
1
Total Nervous (NV) HI across All Media =
0.3
Total Reproductive (RP) HI across All Media =
0.5
Total Urinary (UR) HI across All Media =
0.07
-------
Table A9-15
Summary of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards for COPCs
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0176)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) ¦ Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current/Future
Receptor Population: On-Site Resident
Receptor Age: Lifetime
Thresholds: Chemical-specific (1E-06) and Cumulative (1E-04)
Thresholds: Chemical-specific, Target Organ and Cumulative (HQ > 1)
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Chemical of Potential Concern
Carcinogenic Risk(1)
Non-Carcinogenic Hazard Quotient<1>
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Primary Target Organs
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Cyanide
Cyanide
Metals (Total)
Barium
Cadmium (Water)
Cobalt
Manganese
Chemical Total
Exposure Point Total
Exposure Medium Total
Indoor Air
Shower/Bath (Vapors)
Cyanide
Cyanide
Chemical Total
Exposure Point Total
Exposure Medium Total
Medium Total
Notes:
Receptor Risk Total
Receptor Hazard Index (HI)
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
-------
Table A9-16
Summary of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards for COPCs
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0182)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) ¦ Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current/Future
Receptor Population: On-Site Resident
Receptor Age: Child
Thresholds: Chemical-specific (1E-06) and Cumulative (1E-04)
Thresholds: Chemical-specific, Target Organ and Cumulative (HQ > 1)
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Chemical of Potential Concern
Carcinogenic Risk(1)
Non-Carcinogenic Hazard Quotient<1>
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Primary Target Organs
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
Cyanide
Cyanide
Metals (Total)
Cobalt
Manganese
DV
DV
RP
EN
NV
0.2
5
0.3
4
0.8
0.002
0.007
0.09
0.2
5
0.3
4
0.9
Chemical Total
11
0.1
11
Exposure Point Total
11
Exposure Medium Total
11
Medium Total
11
Notes:
Receptor Risk Total
Receptor Hazard Index (HI)
11
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
Total Developmental (DV) HI across All Media =
6
Total Endocrine (EN) HI across All Media =
4
Total Nervous (NV) HI across All Media =
0.9
Total Reproductive (RP) HI across All Media =
0.3
-------
Table A9-17
Summary of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards for COPCs
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0182)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) ¦ Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current/Future
Receptor Population: On-Site Resident
Receptor Age: Adult
Thresholds: Chemical-specific (1E-06) and Cumulative (1E-04)
Thresholds: Chemical-specific, Target Organ and Cumulative (HQ > 1)
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Chemical of Potential Concern
Carcinogenic Risk(1)
Non-Carcinogenic Hazard Quotient<1>
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Primary Target Organs
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
Cyanide
Cyanide
Metals (Total)
Cobalt
Manganese
DV
DV
RP
EN
NV
0.1
3
0.2
2
0.5
0.001
0.006
0.07
0.1
3
0.2
3
0.5
Chemical Total
7
0.07
7
Exposure Point Total
7
Exposure Medium Total
7
Indoor Air
Shower/Bath (Vapors)
Cyanide
Cyanide
EN
0.003
0.003
Chemical Total
0.003
0.003
Exposure Point Total
0.003
Exposure Medium Total
0.003
Medium Total
7
Notes:
Receptor Risk Total
Receptor Hazard Index (HI)
7
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
Total Developmental (DV) HI across All Media =
3
Total Endocrine (EN) HI across All Media =
3
Total Nervous (NV) HI across All Media =
0.5
Total Reproductive (RP) HI across All Media =
0.2
-------
Table A9-18
Summary of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards for COPCs
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0182)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) ¦ Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current/Future
Receptor Population: On-Site Resident
Receptor Age: Lifetime
Thresholds: Chemical-specific (1E-06) and Cumulative (1E-04)
Thresholds: Chemical-specific, Target Organ and Cumulative (HQ > 1)
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Chemical of Potential Concern
Carcinogenic Risk(1)
Non-Carcinogenic Hazard Quotient<1>
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Primary Target Organs
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
Cyanide
Cyanide
Metals (Total)
Cobalt
Manganese
1E-08
1E-08
Chemical Total
1E-08
1E-08
Exposure Point Total
1E-08
Exposure Medium Total
1E-08
Indoor Air
Shower/Bath (Vapors)
Cyanide
Cyanide
Chemical Total
Exposure Point Total
Exposure Medium Total
Medium Total
1E-08
Notes:
Receptor Risk Total
1E-08
Receptor Hazard Index (HI)
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
-------
Table A9-19
Summary of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards for COPCs
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0197)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) ¦ Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current/Future
Receptor Population: On-Site Resident
Receptor Age: Child
Thresholds: Chemical-specific (1E-06) and Cumulative (1E-04)
Thresholds: Chemical-specific, Target Organ and Cumulative (HQ > 1)
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Chemical of Potential Concern
Carcinogenic Risk(1)
Non-Carcinogenic Hazard Quotient<1>
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Primary Target Organs
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
Cyanide
Cyanide
Metals (Total)
Cadmium (Water)
Cobalt
Manganese
HP
DV
DV
RP
UR
EN
NV
0.003
0.3
4
0.3
0.2
2
0.4
0.0002
0.002
0.01
0.004
0.04
0.003
0.3
4
0.3
0.2
2
0.4
Chemical Total
7
0.06
7
Exposure Point Total
7
Exposure Medium Total
7
Medium Total
7
Notes:
Receptor Risk Total
Receptor Hazard Index (HI)
7
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
Total Developmental (DV) HI across All Media =
4
Total Endocrine (EN) HI across All Media =
2
Total Hepatic (HP) HI across All Media =
0.003
Total Nervous (NV) HI across All Media =
0.4
Total Reproductive (RP) HI across All Media =
0.3
Total Urinary (UR) HI across All Media =
0.2
-------
Table A9-20
Summary of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards for COPCs
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0197)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) ¦ Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current/Future
Receptor Population: On-Site Resident
Receptor Age: Adult
Thresholds: Chemical-specific (1E-06) and Cumulative (1E-04)
Thresholds: Chemical-specific, Target Organ and Cumulative (HQ > 1)
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Chemical of Potential Concern
Carcinogenic Risk(1)
Non-Carcinogenic Hazard Quotient<1>
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Primary Target Organs
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
Cyanide
Cyanide
Metals (Total)
Cadmium (Water)
Cobalt
Manganese
HP
DV
DV
RP
UR
EN
NV
0.002
0.2
2
0.2
0.1
1
0.2
0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.003
0.03
0.002
0.2
2
0.2
0.1
1
0.3
Chemical Total
4
0.05
4
Exposure Point Total
4
Exposure Medium Total
4
Indoor Air
Shower/Bath (Vapors)
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
Cyanide
Cyanide
HP
EN
0.000006
0.003
0.000006
0.003
Chemical Total
0.003
0.003
Exposure Point Total
0.003
Exposure Medium Total
0.003
Medium Total
4
Notes:
Receptor Risk Total
Receptor Hazard Index (HI)
4
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
Total Developmental (DV) HI across All Media =
2
Total Endocrine (EN) HI across All Media =
1
Total Hepatic (HP) HI across All Media =
0.002
Total Nervous (NV) HI across All Media =
0.3
Total Reproductive (RP) HI across All Media =
0.2
Total Urinary (UR) HI across All Media =
0.1
-------
Table A9-21
Summary of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards for COPCs
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0197)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) ¦ Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current/Future
Receptor Population: On-Site Resident
Receptor Age: Lifetime
Thresholds: Chemical-specific (1E-06) and Cumulative (1E-04)
Thresholds: Chemical-specific, Target Organ and Cumulative (HQ > 1)
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Chemical of Potential Concern
Carcinogenic Risk(1)
Non-Carcinogenic Hazard Quotient<1>
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Primary Target Organs
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
Cyanide
Cyanide
Metals (Total)
Cadmium (Water)
Cobalt
Manganese
2E-07
1E-08
2E-08
2E-07
1E-08
Chemical Total
2E-07
2E-08
2E-07
Exposure Point Total
2E-07
Exposure Medium Total
2E-07
Indoor Air
Shower/Bath (Vapors)
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
Cyanide
Cyanide
4E-09
4E-09
Chemical Total
4E-09
4E-09
Exposure Point Total
4E-09
Exposure Medium Total
4E-09
Medium Total
2E-07
Notes:
Receptor Risk Total
2E-07
Receptor Hazard Index (HI)
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
-------
Table A9-22
Summary of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards for COPCs
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0212)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) ¦ Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current/Future
Receptor Population: On-Site Resident
Receptor Age: Child
Thresholds: Chemical-specific (1E-06) and Cumulative (1E-04)
Thresholds: Chemical-specific, Target Organ and Cumulative (HQ > 1)
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Chemical of Potential Concern
Carcinogenic Risk(1)
Non-Carcinogenic Hazard Quotient<1>
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Primary Target Organs
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
Metals (Total)
Cobalt
Copper
HP
DV
DV
EN
Gl
0.001
0.2
1
0.3
0.4
0.0001
0.0005
0.002
0.002
0.2
1
0.3
0.4
Chemical Total
2
0.002
2
Exposure Point Total
2
Exposure Medium Total
2
Medium Total
2
Notes:
Receptor Risk Total
Receptor Hazard Index (HI)
2
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
Total Developmental (DV) HI across All Media =
2
Total Endocrine (EN) HI across All Media =
0.3
Total Gastrointestinal (Gl) HI across All Media =
0.4
Total Hepatic (HP) HI across All Media =
0.002
-------
Table A9-23
Summary of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards for COPCs
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0212)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) ¦ Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current/Future
Receptor Population: On-Site Resident
Receptor Age: Adult
Thresholds: Chemical-specific (1E-06) and Cumulative (1E-04)
Thresholds: Chemical-specific, Target Organ and Cumulative (HQ > 1)
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Chemical of Potential Concern
Carcinogenic Risk(1)
Non-Carcinogenic Hazard Quotient<1>
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Primary Target Organs
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
Metals (Total)
Cobalt
Copper
HP
DV
DV
EN
Gl
0.0008
0.1
0.9
0.2
0.2
0.00007
0.0004
0.001
0.0009
0.1
0.9
0.2
0.2
Chemical Total
1
0.002
1
Exposure Point Total
1
Exposure Medium Total
1
Indoor Air
Shower/Bath (Vapors)
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
HP
0.000003
0.000003
Chemical Total
0.000003
0.000003
Exposure Point Total
0.000003
Exposure Medium Total
0.000003
Medium Total
1
Notes:
Receptor Risk Total
Receptor Hazard Index (HI)
1
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
Total Developmental (DV) HI across All Media =
1
Total Endocrine (EN) HI across All Media =
0.2
Total Gastrointestinal (Gl) HI across All Media =
0.2
Total Hepatic (HP) HI across All Media =
0.0009
-------
Table A9-24
Summary of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards for COPCs
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0212)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) ¦ Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current/Future
Receptor Population: On-Site Resident
Receptor Age: Lifetime
Thresholds: Chemical-specific (1E-06) and Cumulative (1E-04)
Thresholds: Chemical-specific, Target Organ and Cumulative (HQ > 1)
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Chemical of Potential Concern
Carcinogenic Risk(1)
Non-Carcinogenic Hazard Quotient<1>
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Primary Target Organs
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
Metals (Total)
Cobalt
Copper
1E-07
1E-08
1E-08
1E-07
1E-08
Chemical Total
1E-07
1E-08
1E-07
Exposure Point Total
1E-07
Exposure Medium Total
1E-07
Indoor Air
Shower/Bath (Vapors)
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
2E-09
2E-09
Chemical Total
2E-09
2E-09
Exposure Point Total
2E-09
Exposure Medium Total
2E-09
Medium Total
1E-07
Notes:
Receptor Risk Total
1E-07
Receptor Hazard Index (HI)
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
-------
Table A9-25
Summary of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards for COPCs
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0275)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) ¦ Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current/Future
Receptor Population: On-Site Resident
Receptor Age: Child
Thresholds: Chemical-specific (1E-06) and Cumulative (1E-04)
Thresholds: Chemical-specific, Target Organ and Cumulative (HQ > 1)
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Chemical of Potential Concern
Carcinogenic Risk(1)
Non-Carcinogenic Hazard Quotient<1>
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Primary Target Organs
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
Metals (Total)
Cadmium (Water)
Cobalt
Iron
Manganese
DV
DV
UR
EN
Gl
NV
0.1
1
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.009
0.0005
0.0009
0.01
0.1
1
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.1
Chemical Total
2
0.02
2
Exposure Point Total
2
Exposure Medium Total
2
Medium Total
2
Notes:
Receptor Risk Total
Receptor Hazard Index (HI)
2
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
Total Developmental (DV) HI across All Media =
2
Total Endocrine (EN) HI across All Media =
0.3
Total Gastrointestinal (Gl) HI across All Media =
0.2
Total Nervous (NV) HI across All Media =
0.1
Total Urinary (UR) HI across All Media =
0.1
-------
Table A9-26
Summary of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards for COPCs
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0275)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) ¦ Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current/Future
Receptor Population: On-Site Resident
Receptor Age: Adult
Thresholds: Chemical-specific (1E-06) and Cumulative (1E-04)
Thresholds: Chemical-specific, Target Organ and Cumulative (HQ > 1)
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Chemical of Potential Concern
Carcinogenic Risk(1)
Non-Carcinogenic Hazard Quotient<1>
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Primary Target Organs
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
Metals (Total)
Cadmium (Water)
Cobalt
Iron
Manganese
DV
DV
UR
EN
Gl
NV
0.07
0.9
0.06
0.2
0.1
0.07
0.007
0.0004
0.0007
0.01
0.07
0.9
0.07
0.2
0.1
0.08
Chemical Total
1
0.02
1
Exposure Point Total
1
Exposure Medium Total
1
Medium Total
1
Notes:
Receptor Risk Total
Receptor Hazard Index (HI)
1
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
Total Developmental (DV) HI across All Media =
1
Total Endocrine (EN) HI across All Media =
0.2
Total Gastrointestinal (Gl) HI across All Media =
0.1
Total Nervous (NV) HI across All Media =
0.08
Total Urinary (UR) HI across All Media =
0.07
-------
Table A9-27
Summary of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards for COPCs
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0275)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) ¦ Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current/Future
Receptor Population: On-Site Resident
Receptor Age: Lifetime
Thresholds: Chemical-specific (1E-06) and Cumulative (1E-04)
Thresholds: Chemical-specific, Target Organ and Cumulative (HQ > 1)
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Chemical of Potential Concern
Carcinogenic Risk(1)
Non-Carcinogenic Hazard Quotient<1>
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Primary Target Organs
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
Metals (Total)
Cadmium (Water)
Cobalt
Iron
Manganese
7E-09
7E-09
Chemical Total
7E-09
7E-09
Exposure Point Total
7E-09
Exposure Medium Total
7E-09
Medium Total
7E-09
Notes:
Receptor Risk Total
7E-09
Receptor Hazard Index (HI)
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
-------
Table A9-28
Summary of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards for COPCs
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0500)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) ¦ Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current/Future
Receptor Population: On-Site Resident
Receptor Age: Child
Thresholds: Chemical-specific (1E-06) and Cumulative (1E-04)
Thresholds: Chemical-specific, Target Organ and Cumulative (HQ > 1)
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Chemical of Potential Concern
Carcinogenic Risk(1)
Non-Carcinogenic Hazard Quotient<1>
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Primary Target Organs
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Metals (Total)
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium (Water)
Cobalt
Manganese
NV
Gl
UR
EN
NV
0.2
0.09
0.2
4
0.4
0.01
0.06
0.02
0.008
0.04
0.2
0.1
0.2
4
0.4
Chemical Total
5
0.1
5
Exposure Point Total
5
Exposure Medium Total
5
Medium Total
5
Notes:
Receptor Risk Total
Receptor Hazard Index (HI)
5
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
Total Endocrine (EN) HI across All Media =
4
Total Gastrointestinal (Gl) HI across All Media =
0.1
Total Nervous (NV) HI across All Media =
0.6
Total Urinary (UR) HI across All Media =
0.2
-------
Table A9-29
Summary of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards for COPCs
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0500)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) ¦ Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current/Future
Receptor Population: On-Site Resident
Receptor Age: Adult
Thresholds: Chemical-specific (1E-06) and Cumulative (1E-04)
Thresholds: Chemical-specific, Target Organ and Cumulative (HQ > 1)
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Chemical of Potential Concern
Carcinogenic Risk(1)
Non-Carcinogenic Hazard Quotient<1>
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Primary Target Organs
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Metals (Total)
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium (Water)
Cobalt
Manganese
NV
Gl
UR
EN
NV
0.1
0.05
0.1
3
0.2
0.008
0.04
0.01
0.006
0.03
0.1
0.1
0.1
3
0.3
Chemical Total
3
0.1
3
Exposure Point Total
3
Exposure Medium Total
3
Medium Total
3
Notes:
Receptor Risk Total
Receptor Hazard Index (HI)
3
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
Total Endocrine (EN) HI across All Media =
3
Total Gastrointestinal (Gl) HI across All Media =
0.1
Total Nervous (NV) HI across All Media =
0.4
Total Urinary (UR) HI across All Media =
0.1
-------
Table A9-30
Summary of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards for COPCs
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0500)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) ¦ Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current/Future
Receptor Population: On-Site Resident
Receptor Age: Lifetime
Thresholds: Chemical-specific (1E-06) and Cumulative (1E-04)
Thresholds: Chemical-specific, Target Organ and Cumulative (HQ > 1)
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Chemical of Potential Concern
Carcinogenic Risk(1)
Non-Carcinogenic Hazard Quotient<1>
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Primary Target Organs
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Metals (Total)
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium (Water)
Cobalt
Manganese
Chemical Total
Exposure Point Total
Exposure Medium Total
Medium Total
Notes:
Receptor Risk Total
Receptor Hazard Index (HI)
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
-------
Table A9-31
Summary of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards for COPCs
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0501)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) ¦ Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current/Future
Receptor Population: On-Site Resident
Receptor Age: Child
Thresholds: Chemical-specific (1E-06) and Cumulative (1E-04)
Thresholds: Chemical-specific, Target Organ and Cumulative (HQ > 1)
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Chemical of Potential Concern
Carcinogenic Risk(1)
Non-Carcinogenic Hazard Quotient<1>
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Primary Target Organs
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
Metals (Total)
Cobalt
Manganese
HP
DV
DV
EN
NV
0.005
0.3
3
3
0.5
0.0004
0.005
0.06
0.005
0.3
3
3
0.6
Chemical Total
7
0.06
7
Exposure Point Total
7
Exposure Medium Total
7
Medium Total
7
Notes:
Receptor Risk Total
Receptor Hazard Index (HI)
7
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
Total Developmental (DV) HI across All Media =
4
Total Endocrine (EN) HI across All Media =
3
Total Hepatic (HP) HI across All Media =
0.005
Total Nervous (NV) HI across All Media =
0.6
-------
Table A9-32
Summary of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards for COPCs
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0501)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) ¦ Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current/Future
Receptor Population: On-Site Resident
Receptor Age: Adult
Thresholds: Chemical-specific (1E-06) and Cumulative (1E-04)
Thresholds: Chemical-specific, Target Organ and Cumulative (HQ > 1)
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Chemical of Potential Concern
Carcinogenic Risk(1)
Non-Carcinogenic Hazard Quotient<1>
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Primary Target Organs
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
Metals (Total)
Cobalt
Manganese
HP
DV
DV
EN
NV
0.003
0.2
2
2
0.3
0.0003
0.004
0.05
0.003
0.2
2
2
0.4
Chemical Total
4
0.05
4
Exposure Point Total
4
Exposure Medium Total
4
Indoor Air
Shower/Bath (Vapors)
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
HP
0.00001
0.00001
Chemical Total
0.00001
0.00001
Exposure Point Total
0.00001
Exposure Medium Total
0.00001
Medium Total
4
Notes:
Receptor Risk Total
Receptor Hazard Index (HI)
4
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
Total Developmental (DV) HI across All Media =
2
Total Endocrine (EN) HI across All Media =
2
Total Hepatic (HP) HI across All Media =
0.003
Total Nervous (NV) HI across All Media =
0.4
-------
Table A9-33
Summary of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards for COPCs
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0501)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) ¦ Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current/Future
Receptor Population: On-Site Resident
Receptor Age: Lifetime
Thresholds: Chemical-specific (1E-06) and Cumulative (1E-04)
Thresholds: Chemical-specific, Target Organ and Cumulative (HQ > 1)
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Chemical of Potential Concern
Carcinogenic Risk(1)
Non-Carcinogenic Hazard Quotient<1>
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Primary Target Organs
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
Metals (Total)
Cobalt
Manganese
4E-07
2E-08
3E-08
4E-07
2E-08
Chemical Total
4E-07
3E-08
4E-07
Exposure Point Total
4E-07
Exposure Medium Total
4E-07
Indoor Air
Shower/Bath (Vapors)
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Chloroform
7E-09
7E-09
Chemical Total
7E-09
7E-09
Exposure Point Total
7E-09
Exposure Medium Total
7E-09
Medium Total
4E-07
Notes:
Receptor Risk Total
4E-07
Receptor Hazard Index (HI)
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
-------
Table A9-34
Summary of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards for COPCs
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0510)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) ¦ Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current/Future
Receptor Population: On-Site Resident
Receptor Age: Child
Thresholds: Chemical-specific (1E-06) and Cumulative (1E-04)
Thresholds: Chemical-specific, Target Organ and Cumulative (HQ > 1)
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Chemical of Potential Concern
Carcinogenic Risk(1)
Non-Carcinogenic Hazard Quotient<1>
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Primary Target Organs
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Cyanide
Cyanide
Metals (Total)
Barium
Cadmium (Water)
Cobalt
Copper
Manganese
RP
NV
UR
EN
Gl
NV
0.9
0.3
0.2
3
0.1
0.3
0.006
0.02
0.02
0.006
0.0005
0.03
0.9
0.3
0.2
3
0.1
0.3
Chemical Total
5
0.08
5
Exposure Point Total
5
Exposure Medium Total
5
Medium Total
5
Notes:
Receptor Risk Total
Receptor Hazard Index (HI)
5
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
Total Endocrine (EN) HI across All Media =
3
Total Gastrointestinal (Gl) HI across All Media =
0.1
Total Nervous (NV) HI across All Media =
0.7
Total Reproductive (RP) HI across All Media =
0.9
Total Urinary (UR) HI across All Media =
0.2
-------
Table A9-35
Summary of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards for COPCs
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0510)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) ¦ Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current/Future
Receptor Population: On-Site Resident
Receptor Age: Adult
Thresholds: Chemical-specific (1E-06) and Cumulative (1E-04)
Thresholds: Chemical-specific, Target Organ and Cumulative (HQ > 1)
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Chemical of Potential Concern
Carcinogenic Risk(1)
Non-Carcinogenic Hazard Quotient<1>
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Primary Target Organs
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Cyanide
Cyanide
Metals (Total)
Barium
Cadmium (Water)
Cobalt
Copper
Manganese
RP
NV
UR
EN
Gl
NV
0.5
0.2
0.1
2
0.07
0.2
0.004
0.02
0.01
0.004
0.0004
0.02
0.6
0.2
0.1
2
0.08
0.2
Chemical Total
3
0.06
3
Exposure Point Total
3
Exposure Medium Total
3
Indoor Air
Shower/Bath (Vapors)
Cyanide
Cyanide
EN
0.01
0.01
Chemical Total
0.01
0.01
Exposure Point Total
0.01
Exposure Medium Total
0.01
Medium Total
3
Notes:
Receptor Risk Total
Receptor Hazard Index (HI)
3
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
Total Endocrine (EN) HI across All Media =
2
Total Gastrointestinal (Gl) HI across All Media =
0.08
Total Nervous (NV) HI across All Media =
0.4
Total Reproductive (RP) HI across All Media =
0.6
Total Urinary (UR) HI across All Media =
0.1
-------
Table A9-36
Summary of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards for COPCs
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0510)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) ¦ Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current/Future
Receptor Population: On-Site Resident
Receptor Age: Lifetime
Thresholds: Chemical-specific (1E-06) and Cumulative (1E-04)
Thresholds: Chemical-specific, Target Organ and Cumulative (HQ > 1)
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Chemical of Potential Concern
Carcinogenic Risk(1)
Non-Carcinogenic Hazard Quotient<1>
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Primary Target Organs
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Cyanide
Cyanide
Metals (Total)
Barium
Cadmium (Water)
Cobalt
Copper
Manganese
Chemical Total
Exposure Point Total
Exposure Medium Total
Indoor Air
Shower/Bath (Vapors)
Cyanide
Cyanide
Chemical Total
Exposure Point Total
Exposure Medium Total
Medium Total
Notes:
Receptor Risk Total
Receptor Hazard Index (HI)
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
-------
Table A9-37
Summary of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards for COPCs
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0527)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Child) ¦ Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current/Future
Receptor Population: On-Site Resident
Receptor Age: Child
Thresholds: Chemical-specific (1E-06) and Cumulative (1E-04)
Thresholds: Chemical-specific, Target Organ and Cumulative (HQ > 1)
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Chemical of Potential Concern
Carcinogenic Risk(1)
Non-Carcinogenic Hazard Quotient<1>
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Primary Target Organs
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
Metals (Total)
Cobalt
Manganese
DV
EN
NV
2
0.7
0.1
0.001
0.01
2
0.7
0.1
Chemical Total
2
0.01
2
Exposure Point Total
2
Exposure Medium Total
2
Medium Total
2
Notes:
Receptor Risk Total
Receptor Hazard Index (HI)
2
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
Total Developmental (DV) HI across All Media =
2
Total Endocrine (EN) HI across All Media =
0.7
Total Nervous (NV) HI across All Media =
0.1
-------
Table A9-38
Summary of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards for COPCs
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0527)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Adult) ¦ Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current/Future
Receptor Population: On-Site Resident
Receptor Age: Adult
Thresholds: Chemical-specific (1E-06) and Cumulative (1E-04)
Thresholds: Chemical-specific, Target Organ and Cumulative (HQ > 1)
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Chemical of Potential Concern
Carcinogenic Risk(1)
Non-Carcinogenic Hazard Quotient<1>
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Primary Target Organs
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
Metals (Total)
Cobalt
Manganese
DV
EN
NV
1
0.4
0.07
0.001
0.01
1
0.4
0.08
Chemical Total
1
0.01
1
Exposure Point Total
1
Exposure Medium Total
1
Medium Total
1
Notes:
Receptor Risk Total
Receptor Hazard Index (HI)
1
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
Total Developmental (DV) HI across All Media =
1
Total Endocrine (EN) HI across All Media =
0.4
Total Nervous (NV) HI across All Media =
0.08
-------
Table A9-39
Summary of Chemical Cancer Risks and Non-Cancer Hazards for COPCs
Reasonable Maximum Exposure (Well 0527)
Current/Future On-Site Resident (Lifetime) ¦ Groundwater, Groundwater (Potable Use), Groundwater (Vapor Intrusion)
Human Health Risk Assessment
Blades Groundwater Superfund Site, Blades, Delaware
Scenario Timeframe: Current/Future
Receptor Population: On-Site Resident
Receptor Age: Lifetime
Thresholds: Chemical-specific (1E-06) and Cumulative (1E-04)
Thresholds: Chemical-specific, Target Organ and Cumulative (HQ > 1)
Medium
Exposure Medium
Exposure Point
Chemical of Potential Concern
Carcinogenic Risk(1)
Non-Carcinogenic Hazard Quotient<1>
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Primary Target Organs
Ingestion
Dermal
Inhalation
Exposure Routes
Total
Groundwater
Groundwater
Groundwater
Perfluorinated Compounds
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)
Metals (Total)
Cobalt
Manganese
Chemical Total
Exposure Point Total
Exposure Medium Total
Medium Total
Notes:
Receptor Risk Total
Receptor Hazard Index (HI)
(1) CR and HQs are rounded to one non-zero digit; cumulative totals may be slightly higher or lower depending on degree of rounding.
-------
APPENDIX D
DETAILED COST ESTIMATE
-------
Planning Cost Estimate Summary
Alternative: OU2-5: Alternate Water Supply-Waterline Connection
Site: Blades OU-2 (Residential)
Description:
This alternative involves connecting to the existing Town of Blades water distribution system and
Location: Blades, Delaware
extending that system into the affected area. Monthly billing costs covered by end users
Phase: FS
following water line connection.
Date: February 2023
CAPITAL COSTS
Description
QTY
UNIT
UNIT COST
Total
Notes
Site Preparation and Management
RA Contractor Work Plan
1
LS
$20,000
$20,000
Allowance
HASP
1
LS
$10,000
$10,000
Allowance
Equipment mobilization
1
LS
$20,000
$20,000
Allowance
$50,000
Additional Costs Associated with Existing POET/POUT Systems
Carbon unit added for POETs
5
each
$1,350
$6,750
For existing number of residences;
cost per unit from Active Chemical 8/12/22 estimate
Carbon unit added for POUTs
15
each
$50
$750
For existing number of units (15 total in 7 residences);
cost per unit assumed
Oversight
29
HR
$75
$2,175
Assume 3 hrs per existing POET residence for carbon addition;
assume 2 hrs per existing POUT residence for carbon addition
$9,675
General Assumptions
Number of houses to connect
70
houses
Test Pits at intersections
28
ea
2 per intersection assumed
6" Water Main
8,750
ft
Length of roadways in area of connection
Rock Removal
194
cy
Assumes 20% of route @ 3 ft deep
1" Supply from property line to house
7,000
ft
Assumes average of 100 ft/house
Sawcutting Bituminous Pavement
17,500
ft
2 cuts for total length of 6" water main
Removal of Bituminous Pavement
6,806
sy
Assumes 3.5 ft width of cut
Permanent Pavement Repair (Mill & Overlay)
23,333
sy
Assume 3" depth, 24' width for length of 6" water main
Driveway Repair/Replacement
486
sy
Assume 25% of houses * 250 sf/house
Pavement Markings
3,261
ft
Affected length of River Road
Turf Establishment
1,750
sy
Assume 100 sf/house+1 ft width along length of 6" water main
Hydrants
11
ea
Maximum spacing of 800 ft (estimate by dividing 6" water main
length by 800 ft)
Water Line Construction and Existing System/Well Removal/Abandonment
Erosion and Sediment Control Systems
1
LS
$20,000
$20,000
Allowance
Dust control and air monitoring
100
DAY
$1,000
$100,000
Estimated cost per day over assumed 5 months (20 days/mo)
Maintenance & Protection of Traffic
1,600
HR
$50
$80,000
Assumes 2 police for 100 8-hr days
Test Pits
28
EA
$500
$14,000
Unit Cost from RM 10/18/22 estimate
Connect to Blades Water Main and place under RR tracks
50
LF
$1,000
$50,000
Jacking under RR track; unit cost from RM 10/20/22 estimate
Rock Removal
194
CY
$75
$14,583
Unit Cost from RM 10/18/22 estimate
6" Ductile Iron Pipe (DIP) Water Main
8,750
FT
$175
$1,531,250
Unit Cost from RM 10/18/22 estimate
Wedge Blowoff
3
EA
$3,200
$9,600
Unit Cost from RM 10/20/22 estimate
6" gate valve and box
14
EA
$3,000
$42,000
Unit Cost from RM 10/20/22 estimate
1" Copper water service connection
70
EA
$550
$38,500
Unit Cost from RM 10/20/22 estimate
1" Supply from property line to house
7,000
FT
$33
$231,000
Unit Cost from RM 10/18/22 estimate
1" Water meter
70
EA
$300
$21,000
Unit Cost from RM 10/20/22 estimate
Dewatering
1
LS
$15,000
$15,000
Allowance
Sawcutting Bituminous Pavement
17,500
FT
$4
$70,000
Unit Cost from RM 10/18/22 estimate
Removal of Bituminous Pavement
6,806
SY
$12
$81,667
Unit Cost from RM 10/18/22 estimate
Temporary Pavement Repair
6,806
SY
$20
$136,111
Unit Cost from RM 10/20/22 estimate
Permanent Pavement Repair (Mill & Overlay)
23,333
SY
$25
$583,333
Unit Cost from RM 10/18/22 estimate
Driveway Repair/Replacement
486
SY
$25
$12,153
Unit Cost from RM 10/20/22 estimate
Pavement Markings
3,261
FT
$1.5
$4,892
Unit Cost from RM 10/18/22 estimate
Turf Establishment
1,750
SY
$18
$31,500
Unit Cost from RM 10/18/22 estimate
Hydrants, including appurtenances
11
EA
$12,400
$135,625
Unit Cost from RM 10/18/22 estimate
Disinfection of water main
1
LS
$15,000
$15,000
Unit Cost from Durham FS
Pressure and leakage tests
1
LS
$10,000
$10,000
Unit Cost from Durham FS
Water Line Construction Oversight
800
HR
$75
$60,000
Assume 5 mos (20 days/mo) for 8 hrs/day
Well Abandonment
70
each
$600
$42,000
Assume $12/ft; assume 50 ft/well ($600/well)
Well Abandonment Oversight
560
HR
$75
$42,000
Assume 8 hrs per property to abandon/restore
Remove existing POET/POUT systems
20
each
$500
$10,000
Assume up to 20 residences; includes oversight; cost from vendor
discussion
$3,401,214
Post-Construction
Remedial Action Completion Report
200
HR
$100
$20,000
Assumes 3 iterations for regulatory review/comment
$20,000
SUBTOTAL
$3,480,889
$1,044,267
Typically just presumed scope (10%)+ bid(10%); however with
Contingency
30%
current economic supply conditions add another 10%
SUBTOTAL
$4,525,155
Project Management
6%
$271,509
Per USACE/USEPA Guide to Developing CEs during the FS
Remedial Design
10%
$452,516
Use maximum allowed for design services (10%)
Construction Management
8%
$362,012
Per USACE/USEPA Guide to Developing CEs during the FS
TOTAL CAPITAL COSTS (rounded to the nearest $1,000)
| $5,611,000
1
Page 1 of 3
-------
Planning Cost Estimate Summary
Alternative: OU2-5: Alternate Water Supply-Waterline Connection
O&M COSTS
Description
QTY
UNIT
UNIT COST
Total
Notes
Filter/Media Replacement/Maintenance (Annual)
POET Filter replacement (2 times/yr) $192 per event
Cost from bid analysis worksheet dated 4/29/22
POET Media replacement (every 3 years) $224 per event (use 1/3 for annual cost)
Cost from bid analysis worksheet dated 4/29/22
Replacement frequency assumed; cost from Active Chemical
POET carbon replacement (assume 1 time/yr) $850 per event
8/12/22 estimate
POUT Filter replacement (1 time/yr) $41 per event
Cost from bid analysis worksheet dated 4/29/22
POUT carbon replacement (assume 1 time/yr) $50 per event
Replacement frequency and cost assumed
POE Systems (Filter - 2 times per year; Media - every 3 years)
5
each
$1,309
$6,543
Unit Cost = 2* POE Filter Replacement+l/3*POE Media
Replacement
POU Systems (Filter - 1 time per year)
15
each
$91
$1,365
General Maintenance (assume 4 hrs per residence annually)
48
Hr
$75
$3,600
Responding to calls related to system issues (12 residences) for 3
years
SUBTOTAL
$11,508
Contingency
10%
$1,151
Project Management
10%
$1,151
COST PER ANNUAL FILTER/MEDIA REPLACEMENT
$13,810
Residential Monitoring: Labor & Materials
Annual monitoring assumed
Field work
80
HR
$75
$6,000
Assume 3 days+1 day of prep, 2 people, (8 total 10-hr days)
Brief memo summarizing maintenance and annual monitoring results
20
HR
$105
$2,100
Allowance
Letters to each resident
12
HR
$75
$900
Assume 1 hr per letter
Misc supplies, copying, etc.
1
LS
$1,000
$1,000
Allowance
Residential Monitoring: Analytical (first 2 years)
First 2 years - all analytes
PFAS
20
per sample
$282
$5,630
Recent avg. lab cost per sample
TAL Metals
20
per sample
$85
$1,700
Recent avg. lab cost per sample
Hexavalent Chromium
20
per sample
$85
$1,700
Recent avg. lab cost per sample
PAHs
20
per sample
$125
$2,500
Recent avg. lab cost per sample
VOCs
20
per sample
$62
$1,240
Recent avg. lab cost per sample
DO, ORP, pH, Cond., Temp.(field)
20
per sample
$10
$200
Recent avg. lab cost per sample
15% QA/QC
1
LS
$1,946
$1,946
Allowance of 15%
SUBTOTAL
$24,916
Contingency
10%
$2,492
Project Management
10%
$2,492
COST PER RESIDENTIAL EVENT (first 2 years)
$29,899
Residential Monitoring: Analytical (year 3)
Year 3 - remove VOCs and PAHs
PFAS
20
per sample
$282
$5,630
Recent avg. lab cost per sample
TAL Metals
20
per sample
$85
$1,700
Recent avg. lab cost per sample
Hexavalent Chromium
20
per sample
$85
$1,700
Recent avg. lab cost per sample
PAHs
0
per sample
$125
$0
Recent avg. lab cost per sample
VOCs
0
per sample
$62
$0
Recent avg. lab cost per sample
DO, ORP, pH, Cond., Temp.(field)
20
per sample
$10
$200
Recent avg. lab cost per sample
15% QA/QC
1
LS
$1,385
$1,385
Allowance of 15%
SUBTOTAL
$20,615
Contingency
10%
$2,061
Project Management
10%
$2,061
COST PER RESIDENTIAL EVENT (year 3)
$24,737
TOTAL O&M ANNUAL COSTS (rounded to the nearest $1,000) - First 2 Years
$44,000
Filter/Media Replacement and Resid. Monitoring (first 2 years)
TOTAL O&M ANNUAL COSTS (rounded to the nearest $1,000) - Year 3
$39,000
Filter/Media Replacement and Resid. Monitoring (Year 3)
TOTAL O&M ANNUAL COSTS (rounded to the nearest $1,000) - After Year 3
$0
PERIODIC COSTS
Description
QTY
UNIT
UNIT COST
Total
Notes
Five Year Review (through year 30)
0
each
$20,000
$0
Will be included in post-RI remedial alternatives.
SUBTOTAL
$0
TOTAL PERIODIC ANNUAL COSTS (rounded to the nearest $1,000)
$0
PRESENT VALUE ANALYSIS
Straight Cost
| Present Value
Discount „ . , „
Year Capital Cost
Factor at
O&M Costs
Periodic Costs
O&M
Periodic
Notes
Cost Type 0.50%
Capital Cost 0 1 | $5,611,000 |
Discount rate of 0.5% is based on the March 15, 2022
30-Year Real Interest Rate in Appendix C
of the White House Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) Circular A-94, Revised
March 15, 2022
O&M Cost and Periodic Costs 1 0.9950
$44,000
$43,781
$0
O&M -POETS/POUTS Maintenance and Monitoring
2 0.9901
$44,000
$43,563
$0
O&M -POETS/POUTS Maintenance and Monitoring
3 0.9851
$39,000
$38,421
$0
O&M -POETS/POUTS Maintenance and Monitoring
4 0.9802
$0
$0
$0
5 0.9754
$0
$0
$0
$0
6 0.9705
$0
$0
$0
7 0.9657
$0
$0
$0
8 0.9609
$0
$0
$0
9 0.9561
$0
$0
$0
Page 2 of 3
-------
Planning Cost Estimate Summary
Alternative: OU2-5: Alternate Water Supply-Waterline Connection
10
0.9513
$0
$0
$0
$0
11
0.9466
$0
$0
$0
12
0.9419
$0
$0
$0
13
0.9372
$0
$0
$0
14
0.9326
$0
$0
$0
15
0.9279
$0
$0
$0
$0
16
0.9233
$0
$0
$0
17
0.9187
$0
$0
$0
18
0.9141
$0
$0
$0
19
0.9096
$0
$0
$0
20
0.9051
$0
$0
$0
$0
21
0.9006
$0
$0
$0
22
0.8961
$0
$0
$0
23
0.8916
$0
$0
$0
24
0.8872
$0
$0
$0
25
0.8828
$0
$0
$0
$0
26
0.8784
$0
$0
$0
27
0.8740
$0
$0
$0
28
0.8697
$0
$0
$0
29
0.8653
$0
$0
$0
30
0.8610
$0
$0
$0
$0
| $126,000 | $0 |
Total Present Value of Alternative (rounded to the nearest $1,000) | $5,737,000 |
Page 3 of 3
-------
APPENDIX E
DNREC CONCURRENCE LETTER
-------
DIRECTOR'S
Office
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL
Division of Waste and Hazardous Substances
Richardson & Robbins Building
89 Kings Highway
Dover, Delaware 19901
Phone
(302) 739-9400
January 12, 2024
Mr. Paul Leonard, Director
US EPA Region III
4 Penn Center
1600 JFK Blvd.
Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029
RE: State of Delaware Concurrence for Blades Groundwater
Operable Unit-2 (OlJ-2) (DE-1675) Record of Decision for Interim Action
Dear Mr. Leonard:
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the United States
Environmental Protection Agency's ("US EPA") selected remedy and Record of Decision for
Interim Action for the Blades Groundwater Superfund OU-2 Site in Blades, Delaware. The State
of Delaware hereby concurs with the proposed remedy of Connection of Residents to the Public
Water Line for the Blades Groundwater Superfund Site Operable Unit 2.
Feel free to reach me at (302) 395-2600 if you have any questions or concerns about this
concurrence.
cc: Qazi Salahuddin, Environmental Program Administrator, DNREC-WHS-Remediation Section
Amy Bryson, Program Manager II, DNREC-WHS-Remediation Section
Rick Galloway, Project Manager, DNREC-WHS-Remediation Section
Sincerely.
Director
Division of Waste & Hazardous Substances
TTR:QS:slw
TTR22000-RS.docx
DE-1675 II B9
------- |