FIVE-YEAR REVIEW ADDENDUM
LaBounty Superfund Site
Charles City,
Floyd County, Iowa
February 2019
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region 7
11201 Renner Boulevard
Lenexa, Kansas
(Y) qjuna P PeytfcuujA
Mary P. Petajson
Superfund Division Director
3|(»)ipiq
Date
-------
Addendum to LaBounty Five Year Review Report,
dated July 22, 2015
A Five-Year Review addendum is generally completed for remedies where the protectiveness
determination is deferred until further information is obtained. When deferring protectiveness in the
Five-Year Review report, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency typically provides a timeframe for
when the information will be obtained and a protectiveness statement can be made. This document
includes the progress since the Five-Year Review and protectiveness determinations for the remedies
where the statement was deferred in the August 2015 Five-Year Review.
The Five-Year Review report for the LaBounty Superfund site, or Site, in Charles City, Iowa, was
signed by Mary P. Peterson, Superfund Division Director, on July 22, 2015. The protectiveness
statement outlined in the Report was as follows:
Sitewide (OUD
"A protectiveness determination of the site cannot be made at this time until further information is
obtained. Further information will be obtained by taking the following actions: (1) characterization of
interchange and effects of arsenic discharges to the Cedar River directly adjacent to the site, and (2)
investigation into the vapor intrusion pathway."
This addendum addresses this Protectiveness Statement.
Progress Since the Five-Year Review Completion Date
Sitewide (OU 01)
Issue: Lack of characterization of the effects of arsenic discharges to the Cedar River directly adjacent
to the Site to address human health and ecological risk.
Recommendation: Collection of surface water, sediment and pore water in the Cedar River directly
adjacent to the Site for total and dissolved arsenic.
Actions taken: Within the EPA-approved Final Work Plan Response to the Fifth Five-Year Review,
dated August 24, 2016, presented as Appendix B, the responsible parties proposed to collect from the
Cedar River samples of surface water, sediment, and pore water where the highest likelihood of
discharge exists based on the conceptual site model, or CSM. Sampling was conducted October 23-25,
2016, during an observed period of low river flow conditions. Samples were collected from multiple
locations along the eastern river bank to encompass any discharge zones from the Site. Additionally,
sample locations were selected adjacent to impacted groundwater monitoring wells and upstream and
downstream of the Site. (See Figure 2 and Appendix A, Figure 2 for a map of sample locations.) The
sampled media included surface water, sediment, and pore water. Surface water and pore water were
analyzed for filtered and unfiltered arsenic, speciated arsenic, filtered and unfiltered iron, total organic
carbon, dissolved organic carbon, hardness and pH. Sediment was analyzed for arsenic, total organic
carbon, grain size, pH, and sulfates/sulfides. Primary analysis location samples were analyzed
immediately after collection, and contingent analysis location samples were initially held for potential
analysis pending the results of the primary samples.
1
-------
Results are available in the final Summary Report within the Response to the Fifth Five-Year Review
presented in Appendix A. All reported arsenic concentrations for surface water and sediment for all
primary sample locations and contingent location CR16-L11 were one to two orders of magnitude lower
than the human health and ecological screening values identified in the Work Plan. While there were no
exceedances for surface water or sediment in any primary or contingent sample locations, the reported
dissolved arsenic concentrations for pore water at two primary locations, CR16-L06 and CR16-L08,
were at 520 |.ig/L and 160 |J.g/L, respectively. These exceeded the ecological surface water screening
level of 150 micrograms per liter, or (xg/L, identified in the Work Plan. Based on these exceedances and
consistent with the procedure outlined in the Work Plan, the pore water samples for the remaining
contingent sample locations were analyzed for arsenic and there were no other reported exceedances. In
addition, because the reported results for total arsenic were below 150 (.ig/L, it was not necessary to
evaluate the results of arsenic speciation testing.
The arithmetic average, or mean, and 95% upper confidence limit, or UCL, on the mean for the
LaBounty pore water dataset were calculated (64.7 |ig/L and 169.1 |ag/L, respectively) for additional risk
evaluation, consistent with the approach outlined in the approved Work Plan. The mean value is below
the surface water screening value for ecological receptors of 150 fig/L. While the calculated 95% UCL is
just above the surface water screening level, when the adjacent results from the three primary locations
for the Shaw Site are included in the dataset, the 95% UCL (141.|ug/L) is below the screening value.
In summary, the two discrete observations of pore water exceeding surface water screening levels
suggest that localized arsenic transport from the LaBounty Site to the Cedar River may occur; based
upon a more representative screening value, adverse impacts on ecological receptors are not likely,
especially give the localized nature of any impact. Based on these results, it is recommended that no
further investigation or assessment be performed to assess potential arsenic impacts from the Site, other
than annual surface water monitoring in a location directly downstream of CR16-L06 to confirm no
material changes. The sampling will be conducted in accordance with the EPA-approved LaBounty
Monitoring and Maintenance, or M&M program.
Issue: No vapor intrusion investigation adequately conducted for the Site.
Recommendation: Conduct a vapor intrusion investigation for site-related volatile constituents, 1,1,2-
TCA, its breakdown products, stabilizers, and other volatiles with historically high detections.
Actions taken: Within the EPA-approved Final Work Plan Response to the Fifth Five-Year Review,
dated August 24, 2016, and presented as Appendix B, the responsible party proposed to collect an initial
round of sub-slab soil gas samples from buildings within 100 feet of the former landfill's footprint and
analyze for potential site-related volatile constituents. The sub-slab vapor sampling was conducted
during the first field mobilization on September 13, 2016. Based on those results, three additional
quarterly rounds of vapor intrusion monitoring were requested by the EPA. This sampling included sub-
slab samples, co-located indoor air samples, and an ambient air sample from occupied buildings that are
within 100 feet laterally of the former landfill footprint. Additionally, one sub-pavement sample was
collected from a paved area along the boundary between two properties adjacent to the Site, where there
was an assumed storm water sewer line. (See Appendix A, Figure 3 for sample locations.) These
additional rounds were conducted on October 25-26, 2016, March 29, 2017, and June 19-20, 2017, in
accordance with the Work Plan Addendum, approved by the EPA.
2
-------
All samples were analyzed for the following constituents and potential breakdown products: 1,1,2-
trichloroethane, orTCA; tetrachloroethene; trichloroethene; chloroform; benzene; 1,2-dichloroethane;
1,1-dichloroethane; 1,1-dichloroethene; cis 1,2-dichloroethene; and vinyl chloride.
Results are available in the Final Summary Report within the Response to the Fifth Five-Year Review
presented in Appendix A. Sub-slab sampling results showed a number of locations exceeding screening
levels. Specifically, sub-slab vapor concentrations of 1,1,2-TCA, tetrachloroethene, and trichloroethene
exceeded screening levels at VI16-LSS-01 in all four events. Concentrations of these contaminants were
detected in indoor air but were orders of magnitude lower and well below screening values, indicating
that the concrete slab is effective in attenuating any sub-slab vapor sources. Sub-slab sampling results
for tetrachloroethene also exceeded screening levels at VI16-LSS-05 in the March 2017 event only.
However, while significant (8,400 ug/m3), this exceedance was significantly lower than its
corresponding indoor air sample (VI16-LIA-05; 9,400 ug/m3), suggesting sub-slab soil gas is not likely
the sole source of this detection. Finally, the reported concentrations of 1,1-dichloroethene exceeded
sub-slab screening levels at VI16-LSS-05 during all four events and at VI16-LSS-03 in October 2016,
March 2017, and June 2017. The corresponding indoor air detections were consistently below the
screening level. Other contaminants, specifically benzene, were detected in indoor air samples but not in
sub-slab samples, suggesting the presence of background sources.
In summary, multiple lines of evidence indicate that discrete exceedances of indoor air screening levels
of benzene and tetrachloroethene are attributed to the facility's storage and use of products containing
these chemicals. Based on this analysis and consultation with EPA risk assessors and technical staff, it is
recommended that no further investigation be performed to assess the potential vapor intrusion pathway
for the Site. Due to the high sub-slab concentrations, the annual inspections of the building condition
and use will be completed as part of the LaBounty M&M program to confirm there are no significant
changes to the condition of the two relevant buildings that have the potential to impact risk associated
with the vapor intrusion pathway. Any significant cracks and openings, including utility penetrations in
the concrete slab, will be documented and sealed to the extent possible. The approved modifications to
the LaBounty M&M program are summarized in Table 8, and an example building inspection form is
included in Appendix E of the final Summary Report within the Response to the Fifth Five-Year Review
presented in Appendix A.
Issues and Recommendations
No new issues or recommendations have been identified since completion of the Fifth Five-Year
Review.
Protectiveness Statements
Based on new information and/or actions taken since the Five-Year Review completion date, the
protectiveness statement for OU 01 is being revised as follows:
OUOl
"The remedy at OU 01 is protective of human health and the environment."
Sitewide
"The sitewide remedy is protective of human health and the environment."
3
-------
Next Five-Year Review
The next Five-Year Review will be completed on July 22, 2020, five years after the signature of the last
five-year review report.
4
-------
FIGURES
-------
,v
r
\'-v
<- ¦< ' I ¦¦¦¦*%*? ' '» fX > J it
' -"*L : . M. JB.W» y-:
WN'V"^ ' ' " !.
«lw - l- 'fVi
iSf* . :lft
JUlt" ¦ . bi'
ir*W''Jf'f""y
mkr.
v" J
i-
»W
*£«H
:' = V.
-------
-------
APPENDIX A
-------
RESPONSE TO FIFTH 5-YEAR
REVIEW
LaBounty Landfill Site
Charles City, Iowa
Prepared For: Zoetis LLC
Prepared By: Golder Associates Inc.
200 Century Parkway, Suite C
Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054 USA
Distribution:
1 Copy
1 Copy
1 e-Copy
1 e-Copy
1 Copy
USEPA
Iowa Department of Natural Resources
Zoetis LLC
Quantum Management Group
Golder Associates Inc.
April 2018
Project No. 165-2829
A world of
capabilities
delivered locally
Golder, Golder Associates and the GA globe design are trademarks of Golder Associates Corporation
Golder
Associates
-------
165-2829
Table of Contents
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Site Background 1
1.2 Summary of Fifth 5-Year Response Approach 2
2.0 SUMMARY OF FIELD SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES 4
2.1 Overview 4
2.2 Cedar River 4
2.3 Vapor Intrusion 6
3.0 ANALYTICAL RESULTS 8
3.1 Cedar River 8
3.2 Vapor Intrusion 8
3.2.1 Sub-Slab Data 9
3.2.2 Indoor Air Data 9
3.2.3 Site-Specific Attenuation Factors 10
4.0 CONCLUSIONS 11
5.0 REFERENCES 12
List of Tables
Table 1 Sample Collection Summary - Cedar River
Table 2 Surface Water Field Parameter Readings - Cedar River
Table 3 Surface Water Validated Analytical Results - Cedar River
Table 4 Pore Water Validated Analytical Results - Cedar River
Table 5 Sediment Validated Analytical Results - Cedar River
Table 6 Sub-Slab Soil Gas Validated Analytical Results
Table 7 Indoor Air Validated Analytical Results
Table 8 Proposed Monitoring and Maintenance Plan Modifications
List of Figures
Figure 1 Site Location Map
Figure 2 Arsenic Evaluation Sample Locations
Figure 3 Vapor Intrusion Evaluation Sample Locations
List of Appendices
Appendix A Photographic Log
Appendix B Laboratory Data Package for Arsenic Speciation Results
Appendix C Vapor Intrusion Evaluation - Select Safety Data Sheets
Appendix D Vapor Intrusion Evaluation - Site-Specific Attenuation Factors
Appendix E Building Inspection Form
f^i^Golder
g:\projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis chartes cily\200 reports\summafy reports\labounty\revised rtc\frnal revised labounty summary report_rtc.docx
-------
April 2018
1
165-2829
1.0 INTRODUCTION
i
On behalf of Zoetis LLC (Zoetis), Golder Associates Inc. (Golder) has prepared this Response to the Fifth
5-Year Review (Response) to detail the results of surface water, pore water, sediment, and vapor intrusion
sampling in connection with the LaBounty Landfill Site (LaBounty Site) located in Charles City, Iowa, (see
Figure 1). The sampling program described herein was conducted in accordance with the United States
Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) approved Work Plan Response to Fifth 5-Year Review (Golder,
2016a; Work Plan) and the USEPA approved Vapor Intrusion Evaluation Work Plan Addendum (Work Plan
Addendum; Golder 2016b), which together presented the approach for additional characterization of
potential arsenic impacts to the Cedar River and for evaluation of potential vapor intrusion pathways.
Recommendations for additional characterization of potential arsenic impacts to the Cedar River were
identified by the USEPA in the Fifth 5-Year Review for the LaBounty Site (USEPA, 2015a) and in the Third
5-Year Review for the Shaw Site (USEPA, 2015b). The LaBounty and Shaw Sites (referred to herein
collectively as "the Sites") are located across the Cedar River from each other and a synergistic approach
was taken in the development of the characterization programs for the Sites due to their close proximity,
connection, to the Cedar River, and similar contaminant history. For reporting purposes, the Sites have
been considered independently, consistent with USEPA's approach to the 5-year Review.
The overall goal of the characterization program was to collect adequate information to assess current
exposure and potential risk to human health and ecological receptors in the context of USEPA's guidance
on 5-Year Reviews (USEPA, 2012), and in accordance with the approach described in the USEPA-
approved Work Plan. Specifically, the goal was to provide sufficient information to allow USEPA to make
a protectiveness determination for the LaBounty Site. This Response was initially submitted to USEPA for
review on May 10, 2017. On December 22, 2017 an updated Response incorporating all four quarters of
vapor intrusion monitoring data collected in accordance with the Work Plan Addendum was submitted to
USEPA for review. This revised Response addresses USEPA comments received on February 13, 2018.
1.1 Site Background
The LaBounty Site is located on the west side of the Cedar River just downstream of Charles City in Floyd
County, Iowa. It occupies an area of about 8 acres situated entirely within the river's 100-yrfloodplain. The
average discharge of the Cedar River, as measured at United States Geological Survey Gauging Station
05457700 about 0.4 miles upstream of the Site, is 797 cfs (USEPA, 2015a). The river's narrow floodplain
and linear orientation immediately north and west of the Sites suggests that the river is confined by shallow
bedrock in this area, while the wider floodplain and sinuous course of the river indicates that bedrock does
not provide the primary control on floodplain morphology in the local area of the Sites (Munter, 1980).
Investigation records show the presence of glacial loamy till deposits west of the LaBounty Site "Landfill
g:\projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\summary reports\labounty\revised rtc\final revised labounty summary report_rtc.dooc
F Golder
Associates
-------
Area" which are likely also found on the opposite river bank adjacent to the Shaw Site and underlying the
recreational campground property.
From the 1950's through the 1970's sludge containing various compounds was disposed of at the LaBounty
Site. Following a 1977 Administrative Order to cease operations and prevent runoff, a clay cap was
constructed over the landfilled area in 1980 to reduce infiltration, and in 1986 a groundwater diversion wall
was constructed upstream, as shown on Figure 2, to collect and divert groundwater away from the landfill
area.
A detailed summary of Site Background information for the LaBounty Site is included in the USEPA's Fifth
5-Year Review Report (USEPA, 2015a).
1.2 Summary of Fifth 5-Year Response Approach
USEPA identified the following issues and recommendations in the Fifth 5-Year Review Report.
¦ Arsenic
• USEPA Issue - "Lack of characterization of the effects of arsenic discharges to the
Cedar River directly adjacent to the site to address human health and ecological risk."
• USEPA Recommendation - "Collection of surface water, sediment and pore water in
Cedar River directly adjacent to the site for total and dissolved arsenic."
• Proposed Approach presented in the approved Work Plan - Collect samples in the
Cedar River surface water, sediment, and pore water where the highest likelihood of
discharge exists based on the Conceptual Site Model.
¦ Vapor Intrusion
• USEPA Issue - "No vapor intrusion investigation adequately conducted for the site."
• USEPA Recommendation - "Conduct a vapor intrusion investigation for site-related
, volatile constituents, 1,1,2-TCA, its breakdown products, stabilizers, and other volatiles
with historically high detections."
• Proposed Approach presented in the approved Work Plan - Collect an initial round of
sub-slab soil gas samples from buildings within 100 feet of the former landfill's footprint
and analyze for potential Site-related volatile constituents.
The primary objective of this additional investigation was to determine if there are unacceptable risks to
human health or the environment from impacts associated with the LaBounty Site (i.e., potential arsenic
impacts to the Cedar River or vapor intrusion impacts from Site-related VOCs to nearby buildings) that
would indicate the remedy is no longer protective. The field sampling and analysis program described in
the Work Plan was designed to focus on determining current exposures and potential risks so that USEPA
can make a protectiveness determination.
As described in the Work Plan, a focused and phased risk evaluation approach was developed to determine
remedy protectiveness. Appropriately protective generic screening values and site-specific threshold
g:\projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\summary reports\labounty\revised rtc\final revised labounty summary report_rtc.docx
_ Golder
Associates
-------
3
165-2829
values (human health and ecological) were identified in the Work Plan for all media sampled and the
analytical results were compared to these values as described herein. The following Sections provide
details on the sampling, results, and risk evaluation.
g:\projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis ciiartes city\200 reports\summary reports\labounty\revised rtcAfinal revised labounty summary report_rtc.do«
Golder
'Associates
-------
2.1 Overview
The river sampling program was planned for late summer months (August/September) to target low river
stage and flow conditions which are typical during that time of year and allow for a more conservative
(protective) evaluation due to low dilution of groundwater discharges. Sampling at the Campground Pond,
associated with the Shaw Site, was conducted in early September 2017, but precipitation immediately
preceding and following this sampling led to suspension of the Cedar River sampling program for both Sites
due to an elevated water level and increased flow conditions.
Precipitation and Cedar River conditions and forecasts were tracked daily using available weather service
forecasts and United States Geological Survey (USGS) flow and discharge data (USGS gage 05457700
Cedar River at Charles City, IA) to identify an acceptable period of time to conduct the remaining sampling.
Sampling of the LaBounty Landfill Site Cedar River locations was conducted October 23-25, 2016 during
the period of the lowest river flow conditions observed from August through October 2016.
A summary of the arsenic evaluation samples collected is provided in Table 1, and the sample locations
are shown on Figure 2. A photographic log of representative sample locations is included as Appendix A.
Sub-slab vapor sampling associated with the LaBounty Site vapor intrusion evaluation was conducted
during the first field mobilization on September 13, 2016. Based on these results, which were presented in
the Work Plan Addendum, (Golder 2016b), three additional quarterly rounds of vapor intrusion monitoring
(including sub-slab samples, co-located indoor air samples, and an ambient air sample) were requested by
USEPA. The additional rounds of vapor intrusion monitoring were subsequently conducted on October 25-
26, 2016, March 29, 2017, and June 19-20, 2017 in accordance with the Work Plan Addendum. Vapor
sample locations are shown on Figure 3.
2.2 Cedar River
In order to conservatively evaluate the potential risk associated with arsenic discharges to the Cedar River
samples were collected of each potentially affected media (surface water, sediment, and pore water), from
multiple locations along the eastern river bank to encompass any discharge zones from the Site. The
sampling was performed in close proximity to the river bank and along the entire length of the LaBounty
Site boundary, in order to provide sufficient information to assess the potential for risk to ecological
populations and human health. The sample program included locations adjacent to impacted groundwater
monitoring wells, full coverage along the bank adjacent to the LaBounty Site, and additional upstream and
downstream sample locations. Primary analysis locations (to be analyzed immediately after collection) and
contingent analysis locations (to be initially held for potential analysis pending the results of the primary
samples) were identified.
g:\projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles rity\200 reports\summary reports\labounty\revised rtctfinal revised labounty summary report_rtc.docx
Golder
Associates
-------
April 2018
5
165-2829
The overall sampling program approach for the LaBounty Site was consistent with the approach for the
nearby Shaw Site so that, as appropriate, the two data sets for the Cedar River could be combined to
assess overall exposure. For the purpose of this Response, the LaBounty Site is generally evaluated
independently. Results from the associated Shaw Site sampling were presented in a separate report
submitted to USEPA in January 2017 (Golder, 2017) which was subsequently approved by USEPA as
documented in electronic mail (e-mail) correspondence dated February 22, 2017.
Collection of co-located surface water, pore water, and sediment samples was attempted from six proposed
primary locations and five proposed contingency locations (CR16-L01 through CR16-L11). Sampling of all
media was achieved at the majority of the locations, but pore water could not be collected from CR16-L04
due to the presence of very fine substrate as noted in Table 1. In some cases, the sample locations were
adjusted in the field, to allow for sampling of all media (e.g. to target depositional sediment areas or for safe
access into the river by wading). Final sample location coordinates were recorded using a handheld GPS
enabled device and are presented in Figure 2.
Surface water samples were collected from approximately 6 inches above the sediment interface1 by direct
dipping the sample container into the water body. Pore water samples were collected using a "pushpoint"
Henry's sampling device (Henry's Sampler) which was inserted into the top few centimeters of the sediment
and a peristaltic pump was used for sample extraction. Sediment samples of the biologically active zone
were collected as "grab" samples from the upper 6 inches of sediment using a stainless steel scoop or
trowel within a bottomless bucket inserted into the sediment to reduce water flow around the sample location
(and limit possible loss of fines). All sample locations were accessed by wading and potential disturbance
was minimized by approaching locations from downstream to the greatest extent possible.
Samples from the Cedar River were analyzed for the following parameters to assess arsenic and
geochemical indicators that affect fate, transport, and toxicity:
¦ Surface water and pore water - arsenic (unfiltered and filtered), speciated arsenic (III and
V), iron (unfiltered and filtered), total organic carbon, dissolved organic carbon, hardness,
and pH
¦ Sediment - arsenic, total organic carbon, grain size, pH, and sulfates/sulfides
All sampling was conducted consistent with the Work Plan with the following minor exceptions:
¦ The originally proposed location for CR16-L01 was physically inaccessible from the bank
or by wading, so the sample location was moved approximately 50 feet upstream.
¦ Due to heavy precipitation in the weather forecast when the Cedar River sampling work
was being conducted, the primary and contingent sample locations were not all sampled
in a downstream to upstream sequence. The primary sample locations and a majority of
contingent locations were collected from downstream to upstream over the course of two
1 An additional surface water sample was to have been collected if water depths exceeded 18 inches but this was not the case.
g:\projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\summary reports\labounty\revised rtcAfinal revised labounty summary report_rtc.docx
|p Golder
Associates
-------
April 2018
6
165-2829
days, and the remaining contingent samples were collected on the third day. This resulted
in the sampling of some upstream primary sample locations prior to sampling downstream
contingent locations, but with at least 24 hours of separation between collection.
¦ Pore water was not able to be collected from CR16-L04 due to the presence of a very fine
sediment substrate.
2.3 Vapor Intrusion
The vapor intrusion evaluation was developed based on the Conceptual Site Model and was designed to
evaluate potential risk associated with any VOC transport from the LaBounty Site through the vadose zone
toward off-Site buildings. Consistent with the OSWER Technical Guide for Assessing and Mitigating the
Vapor Intrusion Pathway from Subsurface Vapor Sources to Indoor Air (USEPA, 2015), 6 sub-slab vapor
samples (VI16-LSS-01 through VI16-LSS-06) were collected from within two occupied buildings that are
within 100 feet laterally of the former landfill footprint. Based on an assessment of potential subsurface
utilities that could be acting as preferential flow pathways, one sub-pavement sample (VI16-LSS-07) was
also collected in the paved area along the boundary between two properties adjacent to the Site, where
available documents indicate a stormwater sewer line exists. All sample locations are shown on Figure 3
and are consistent with the locations proposed in the Work Plan.
All sampling areas were cleared for utilities using ground penetrating radar (GPR) and temporary sampling
ports were installed through the existing concrete slab or pavement to facilitate the sampling. Helium tracer
tests were carried out to verify the integrity of all sample equipment collection set-ups prior to collection of
sub-slab samples. Sub-slab samples were collected using batch certified 6-liter Summa canisters with flow
controllers set to collect samples over a 30 minute period at a rate of 200 milliliters per minute (ml/min).
Indoor and ambient air samples were collected using 6-liter Summa canisters using flow controllers set to
collect samples over an 8-hour period in the breathing zone (a height of approximately 3-5 feet above
grade).
All sampling was conducted consistent with the approved Work Plan and Work Plan Addendum, with the
following minor exceptions:
¦ The ambient air sample (VI16-LAA-01) from the October 2017 sampling event was
compromised (moved by others from the intended sample location and terminated before
the 8-hour sampling period ended) and, as discussed with USEPA via telephone, was not
analyzed.
¦ It was not possible to collect the sub-slab soil gas sample located at VI16-LSS-02 during
the March 2017 event due to the presence of heavy equipment undergoing maintenance,
which blocked access.
All sub-slab, ambient, and indoor air samples were analyzed for the following constituents and potential
breakdown products in accordance with the approved Work Plan:
g:\projects\2016 projectsM 652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\summary reports\labounty\revised rtc\final revised labounty summary report_rtc.docx
F Golder
Associates
-------
April 2018 7 165-2829
¦ 1,1,2-TCA, tetrachloroethene, trichloroethene, chloroform, benzene, 1,2-dichloroethane,
1,1-dichloroethane, 1,1-dichloroethene, cis 1,2-dichloroethene, and vinyl chloride
g:\projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\summary reports\labounty\revised rtc\final revised labounty summary report_rtc.docx
Golder
Associates
-------
April 2018
8
165-2829
3.0 ANALYTICAL RESULTS
3.1 Cedar River
Validated analytical results for Cedar River surface water, pore water, and sediment are presented in Tables
3, 4, and 5, respectively. As shown on the tables, all reported arsenic concentrations for surface water and
sediment for all primary sample locations and contingent location CR16-L11 were one to two orders of
magnitude lower than the human health and ecological screening values identified in the Work Plan. While
there were no exceedances for surface water or sediment, the reported dissolved arsenic concentrations
for pore water at two primary locations (CR16-L06 and CR16-L08) exceeded the ecological surface water
screening level (150 pg/L) identified in the Work Plan. Based on these exceedances and consistent with
the procedure outlined in the Work Plan, the pore water samples for the remaining contingent sample
locations were analyzed for arsenic and there were no other reported exceedances. In addition, because
the reported results for total arsenic were below relevant screening values, it was not necessary to evaluate
the results of arsenic speciation testing. The arsenic speciation data were therefore not validated but are
included in unvalidated format in Appendix B.
The arithmetic average (mean) and 95% upper confidence limit (UCL) on the mean for the LaBounty pore
water dataset were calculated (64.7 pg/L and 169.1 pg/L, respectively) for additional risk evaluation,
consistent with the approach outlined in the approved Work Plan. The mean value is below the surface
water screening value for ecological receptors of 150 yg/L. While the calculated 95% UCL is just above
the surface water screening level, when the adjacent results from the three primary locations for the Shaw
Site are included in the dataset, the 95% UCL (141.pg/L) is below the screening value2. Furthermore,
assessment indicates that a more appropriate pore water screening value, based on infaunal species (as
opposed to a surface water value) would be around 300 pg/L (based on Irving, 2008).
The two discrete observations of pore water exceeding surface water screening levels suggests localized
arsenic transport from the LaBounty Site to the Cedar River may occur. Based upon a more representative
screening value, adverse impacts on ecological receptors are not likely, especially given the localized
nature of any impact. As suggested by USEPA, in order to confirm no material changes occur in the future,
annual surface water sampling will occur directly downstream of CR16-L06 as shown in Figure 2.
3.2 Vapor Intrusion
Sub-slab soil gas and indoor air analytical results are presented in Tables 6 and 7, respectively.
2 As noted in the approved Work Plan, it is appropriate to consider the complete Cedar River data set when calculating 95% UCL
statistics because of the continuity of the habitat and the goal of receptor population protection.
g:\projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\summary reports\labounty\revised rtc\final revised labounty summary report_rtc.docx
r Golder
Associates
-------
April 2018
9
165-2829
3.2.1 Sub-Slab Data
As shown in Table 6, reported sub-slab vapor concentrations of 1,1,2-TCA, tetrachloroethene, and
trichloroethene exceeded screening levels at VI16-LSS-01 in all four events. Reported results for
tetrachloroethene also exceeded screening levels at VI16-LSS-05 in the March 2017 event only.The
reported concentrations of 1,1-dichloroethene exceeded sub-slab screening levels at VI16-LSS-05 during
all four events and at VI16-LSS-03 in October 2016, March 2017, and June 2017.. Sub-slab vapor results
for all other contaminants of concern were one or more orders of magnitude below relevant screening
levels. As approved by USEPA in the Work Plan Addendum, sub-pavement vapor results at VI16-LSS-07
(the location of a possible utility related preferential pathway) in September 2016 were well below screening
levels and no further monitoring of this location was conducted.
3.2.2 Indoor Air Data
As shown in Table 7indoorair levels of benzene exceeded screening levels at VI16-LIA-03 in October 2016
and March 2017 and at VI16-LSS-04 in October 2017. As noted above, benzene was not detected above
sub-slab vapor screening levels suggesting the presence of background sources.
Reported indoor air concentrations of tetrachloroethene exceeded screening levels at VI16-LIA-06 in
October 2016 and March 2017 and at VI16-LIA-03, VI16-LIA-04, and VI16-LIA-05 during the March 2017
event. Co-located sub-slab vapor results did not indicate the presence of tetrochloroethene above
screening levels, except at VI16-LSS-05. The detection of tetrachloroethene in sub-slab vapor at V116-
LSS-05, while significant (8,400 ug/m3) is lower than its corresponding indoor air sample (VI16-LIA-05;
9,400 ug/m3) suggesting sub-slab soil gas is not likely the sole source of this detection. Tetrachloroethene,
trichloroethene, and 1,1,2-trichloroethane were detected above screening levels in sub-slab soil gas at
VI16-LSS-01 during each of the monitoring events, while indoor air levels at V116-LIA-01 were orders of
magnitude lower and well below screening values, indicating that the concrete slab is effective in
attenuating any,sub-slab vapor sources. Similarly, 1,1-dichloroethene was detected above sub-slab vapor
screening levels at VI16-LSS-03 and VI16-LSS-05; however, all detections in indoor air were consistently
below the screening level. No constituents were detected in indoor air above screening levels in June 2017.
The two buildings where these samples were collected are actively, used for vehicle and equipment
maintenance, and numerous petrochemicals and solvents were observed on-site at the time of sampling.
This was particularly the case during the March 2017 event when ongoing maintenance of heavy machinery
physically blocked access or encroached on areas scheduled for sampling. Safety Data Sheets (SDSs) for
a subset of products stored and actively used in these buildings that contain benzene or tetrachloroethene
are included in Appendix C and appear likely to be the source of the indoor air detections. Furthermore, as
noted by USEPA (2015c) these indoor air sources may also influence sub-slab vapor concentrations.
g:\projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\summary reports\labounty\revised rtc\final revised labounty summary report_rtc.docx
(P Golder
Associates
-------
April 2018
10
165-2829
3.2.3 Site-Specific Attenuation Factors
Indoor air concentrations of benzene and tetrachloroethene exceeded sub-slab vapor concentrations in
multiple instances indicating the presence of an indoor air source. Attenuation factors were developed as
an additional line of evidence to distinguish the contribution of sub-slab and background sources to indoor
air exceedances and are detailed in Appendix D. Calculations were based on 1,1-dichloroethene because
it was detected in both sub-slab vapor and indoor air at VI16-LSS/LIA-01 through VI16-LSS/LIA-01 during
nearly every sampling event. As no indoor air sources of 1,1-dichloroethene were identified, it can be
conservatively assumed that indoor air levels of this constituent are due primarily to sub-slab vapor. The
1,1-dichlorethene attenuation factor calculated using co-located sub-slab and indoor air concentrations
ranged between 4x10® and 0.01 based on location and season. The maximum 1,1-dichloroethene
attenuation factor (0.01) indicates more attenuation than USEPA's generic attenuation factor of 0.03, and
is consistent with USEPA (2015c) which notes that attenuation is typically greater than indicated by the
generic value. The maximum calculated 1,1-dichloroethene attenuation factor was then used to
conservatively predict the contribution of sub-slab vapor sources of benzene and tetrachloroethene to
indoor air at VI16-LIA-03 through VI16-LIA-06. All concentrations of benzene and tetrachloroethene
predicted by this method were well below both observed indoor air concentrations and USEPA screening
levels. This further indicates that background sources are likely the reason for the observed exceedances
of screening levels in indoor air. In addition, utilizing USEPA's generic attenuation factor of 0.03 to calculate
indoor air concentrations from measured sub-slab concentrations results in much lower concentrations of
benzene and tetrachloroethene than were observed, confirming the significance of background sources.
As noted by USEPA (2015c), vapor source types that make the use of health-based vapor intrusion
screening levels inappropriate for soil gas include:
"Those originating in commercial or industrial settings where vapor-forming chemicals can be
released within an enclosed space and the density of the chemicals' vapor may result in significant
advective transport of the vapors downward through cracks and openings in floors and into the
vadose zone."
Finally, spatially and/or temporally isolated exceedances of indoor air screening levels are not
representative of overall exposure conditions in these buildings. Although three and four exceedances of
indoor air screening levels were observed for benzene and tetrachloroethene respectively, these discrete
observations appear to be the result of an apparent indoor air source and not of vapor intrusion. Based
upon the multiple lines of evidence cited above a representative exposure level to sub-slab vapor sources
for building workers would likely be below USEPA screening levels for the vapor intrusion pathway.
g:\projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\summary reports\labounty\revised rtdfinal revised labounty summary report_rtc.docx
[F Golder
Associates
-------
April 2018
11
165-2829
4.0 CONCLUSIONS
Based on the risk evaluation framework described in the approved Work Plan, the data collected provides
sufficient information to allow USEPA to make a protectiveness determination for the LaBounty Site.
All reported surface water and sediment arsenic concentrations were one to two orders of magnitude below
relevant human health and ecological screening values. While there were two discrete exceedances of
arsenic in pore water when compared to a surface water ecological screening value, the mean and 95%
UCL calculated using the entire pore water dataset is below the surface water screening value identified in
the Work Plan, and all of the individual samples are well below an assessed screening value for pore water
(based on infaunal species). As suggested by USEPA, it is recommended that the location of annual
surface water sampling be modified to include the area of pore water exceedance. The sampling procedure
will be consistent with the USEPA approved LaBounty Monitoring and Maintenance (M&M) program.
Based on the results of this investigation, it is recommended that no further investigation or assessment be
performed to assess potential arsenic impacts from the LaBounty Site, other than annual surface water
monitoring, and that USEPA conclude that the remedy is protective with respect to the Cedar River.
Four rounds of sub-slab vapor and indoor air data collected as part of the approved Work Plan and Work
Plan Addendum provides sufficient information to allow USEPA to make a protectiveness determination for
the LaBounty Site with respect to potential vapor intrusion. Multiple lines of evidence indicate that discrete
/
exceedances of indoor air screening levels of benzene and tetrachloroethene are attributed to the facility's
storage and use of products containing these chemicals. A representative exposure level for building
workers that excludes indoor air sources would likely be below USEPA screening levels for the vapor
intrusion pathway.
It is recommended that no further investigation be performed to assess the potential vapor intrusion
pathway for the LaBounty Site and that USEPA conclude that the remedy is protective based on the results
of this vapor intrusion investigation. Annual inspections of the building condition and use will be completed
as part of the LaBounty M&M program to confirm there are no significant changes to the condition of the
two relevant buildings that have the potential to impact risk associated with the vapor intrusion pathway.
Any significant cracks and openings, including utility penetrations in the concrete slab will be documented
and sealed to the extent practicable. Proposed modifications to the LaBounty M&M program are
summarized in Table 8 and an example building inspection form is included in Appendix E.
g:\projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles dty\200 reports\summary reports\laboiinty\revised rtctfinal revised labounty summary report_rtc.docx
Golder
Associates
-------
April 2018
12
165-2829
5.0 REFERENCES
MHE Products 2003. Sampling will be conducted consistent with the PushPoint Sampler (US Pat.
#6,470,967) Operator's Manual and Applications Guide.
Golder 2016a. Work Plan Response to Third 5-Year Review, Shaw Avenue Dump Site, Charles City, Iowa.
August, 2016.
Golder 2016b. Sub-slab Vapor Sample Results from September 13, 2016 and Vapor Intrusion Evaluation
Work Plan Addendum. November 2, 2016.
Golder 2017. Response to Third 5-Year Review, Shaw Avenue Dump Site, Charles City, Iowa. January,
2017.
IDNR 2007. Arsenic Human Health Criteria Issues. August 8, 2007.
http://www.iowadnr.aov/Dortals/idnr/uoloads/water/standards/files/k arsenic.pdf?amp:tabid=1308
USEPA 2011. Exposure Factors Handbook: 2011 Edition. October 2011.
USEPA 2012. Memorandum "Clarifying the Use of Protectiveness Determinations for Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act Five-Year Reviews." September 13, 2012.
USEPA 2015a. Fifth 5-Year Review Report for the LaBounty Site, Charles City, Floyd County, Iowa. July
22,2015.
USEPA 2015b. Third 5-Year Review Report for the Shaw Avenue Dump Site, Charles City, Floyd County,
Iowa. August 2015.
USEPA 2015c. OSWER Technical Guide for Assessing and Mitigating the Vapor Intrusion Pathway form
Subsurface Vapor Sources to Indoor Air. June 2015.USEPA 2016. Regional Screening Levels (RSLs)
for Superfund. May 2016.
g:\projects\2016 projects\ 1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\summary reports\labounty\revised rtc\final revised labounty summary report_rtc.docx
r Golder
Associates
-------
TABLES
-------
May 2017 Table 1
Sample Collection Summary - Cedar River
LaBounty Landfill Site
Charles City, IA
Location
Date
Sampled
Environmental Media
Surface Water
Sediment
Pore Water
CR16-L01
10/23/2016
X
X
X
CR16-L02
10/23/2016
X
X
X
CR16-L031
10/25/2016
X
X
X '
CR16-L0412
10/24/2016
X
X
CR16-L05
10/23/2016
X
X
X
CR16-L06
10/23/2016
X
X
X
CR16-L07
10/24/2016
X
X
X
CR16-L08
10/24/2016
X
X
X
CR16-L091
10/25/2016
X-,
X
X
CR16-L10
10/24/2016
X
X
X
CR16-L111
10/24/2016
X
X
X
Notes:
1. Contingent samples were collected, but surface water and sediment
were not analyzed based on results from primary locations.
2. Sediment substrate did not allow for pore water collection.
G:\PROJECTS\2016 ProjectsM652829 - Zoetis Charles City\200 Reports\Summary Reports\LaBounty\Fina!\Tables\
Tables 1&2_Summary_and_Surface Water Field Parameters.xlsx
5/10/2017 Page 1 of 1
-------
May 2017 Table 2 165-2829
Surface Water Field Parameter Readings - Cedar River
LaBounty Landfill Site
Charles City, IA
Location
Date
Sampled
Depth to
Bottom
Temp
pH
Specific
Conductance
Turbidity
DO
Redox
Potential
Water
Velocity
[inches
below
surface]
[°C]
[std]
[mS/cm]
[ntu]
[mg/L]
[mV]
[feet/second]
CR16-L01
10/23/2016
12.0
10.81
8.27
0.671
41.5
10.18
124
0.00
CR16-L02
10/23/2016
12.0
10.79
8.18
0.675
51.3
11.54
209
0.00
CR16-L031
10/25/2016
10.5
9.12
7.91
0.692
0.0
8.45
150
0.00
CR16-L041
10/24/2016
11.0
10.53
8.37
0.643
1.9
11.00
221
0.50
CR16-L05
10/23/2016
17.0
10.89
8.15
0.663
1.1
9.85
210
0.00
CR16-L06
10/23/2016
10.0
10.78
8.15
0.665
1.9
11.43
187
1.00
CR16-L07
10/24/2016
NM
9.08
7.46
0.684
2.3
8.72
161
0.00
CR16-L08
10/24/2016
14.0
9.25
8.16
0.660
6.1
9.64
130
1.00
CR16-L091
10/25/2016
8.5
9.30
8.27
0.652
0.0
10.02
173
0.75
CR16-L10
10/24/2016
12.0
9.80
8.34
0.657
1.3
9.81
185
1.00
CR16-L111
10/24/2016
10.0
10.12
8.33
0.667
6.2
10.21
211
0.50
Note:
1. Contingent sample location.
Abbreviations:
DO - Dissolved Oxygen
Temp - Temperature
°C- degrees Celsius
¦std - standard pH units
mS/cm - microsiemens per centimeter
ntu - nephelometic turbidity units
mg/L - milligrams per liter
mV - millivolts
NM - not measured
Checked by: JAS 1/5/2017
G:\PROJECTS\2016 Projects\1652829 - Zoetis Charles City\200 Reports\Summary Reports\LaBounty\Final\Tables\
Tables 1&2_Summary_and_Surface Water Field Parameters.xlsx jp Qoldcf
5/10/2017 Page 1 of 1 Associates
-------
May 2017 labia 3 185-2829
Surface Water Validated Analytical Results - Cedar River
LaBounty Landfill
Charts* City, Iowa
Location ID
Sample Date
N=Normal, FD=Field Duplicate
CR16-L01
10/23/2018
N
CR1S-L01
10/23/2018
FD
CR16-L02
10/23/2016
N
CR16-L05
10/23/2016
N
CR16-L06
10/23/2018
N
CR1S-L08
10/24/2016
N
CR18-L1Q
10/24/2016
N
CR16-L11
10/24/2016
N
Parameter
Unit
Site-Specific
Exposure SLs'
WQS
Aquatic2
WQS Human
Health3
Result Qual RL
Result Qual RL
Result Qual RL
Result Qual RL
Result Qual RL
Result Qual RL
Result Qual RL
Result Qual RL
I
I
!
1
i
1
1
1
i
!
i
1
I
Arsenic
ug/L
122
150
50
12
1.3
13
1.3
13
1.3
16
1.3
eTl
1.3
1,6
1,3
1.4
1.3
1.2
J
1.3
Calcium
ug/L
NS
NS
NS
80000
250
83000
250
86000
250
81000
250
82000
250
82000
250
80000
250
NA
Iron
ug/L
NS
NS
NS
110
J
130
83
J
130
93 '
J
130
78
J
130
88
J
130
82
J
130
71
J
130
NA
Magnesium
ug/L
NS
NS
NS
24000
130
28000
130
27000
130
25000
130
25000
130
28000
130
25000
130
NA
Arsenic
ug/L
122
150
50
12
1.3
13
1.3
13
1.3
17
1.3
6.6
1.3
2.5
1,3
2.1
1.3
1.S
1.3
tart
ug/L
NS
NS
NS
<130
U
130
< 130
U
130
<130
U
130
< 130
U
130
< 130
U
130
<130
U
130
< 130
u
130
NA
Disserved Organic Carbon
mfl/L
NS
NS
NS
2.9
1
2.S
1
2.6
1
2.6
1
2.7
1
2.6
1
2.7
1
NA
Hardness
mg/L
NS
NS
NS
300
8
310
6
320
6
310
8
310
6
310
8
310
6
NA
Hardness, Calcium Carbonate
mg/L
NS
NS
NS
200
3.1
210
3.1
210
3.1
200
3.1
200
3.1
200
3.1
200
3.1
NA
Hardness, Magnesium Carbonate
mg/L
NS
NS
NS
100
2.6
110
2.6
110
2.6
100
2.6
100
2.6
110
2.6
100
2.6
NA
Total Organic Carbon
mg/L
NS
NS
fjg
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
2.9
1
3.1
1
NA
1. Site-specific surface water exposure parameters screening levels
(Worts; Plan Appendix Table 8).
2. Iowa Water Quality Standard (WQS) for aquatic life,
3. Iowa Water Quality Standard (WQS) for human health.
4. There war* no reported exceedartces of site-specific SVs, WQS
for aquatic life, or WQS for human health for arsenic.
Abbreviation
NA = Not analyzed, For contingent location L11, only arsenic was
analyzed for each media,
NSV = No Screening Value established. SVs were
estabilshed/selected only for arsenic as described in the approved
Wot* Plan.
RL = reporting limit
Units: mg/L = milligram per liter; ug/l = microgram per liter
j = estimated result
U = not detected above RL
Data Checked by: JS 11/30/16
Table Checked by: KSG 12/2/16
G-\PRGJECTS\20lS Prciects\1852S29 - Zcef® Chsries f?JSK>f!8\Surntn8ry RflportsULaBcHirtyVFif^Tart^tfSNALTaHsa- Ls®ou(% Cedar River Stffface WM«s-
-------
May 201? .Table 4
Pore Water Validated Analytical Results - Cedar River
LaBourrty LandFM
Charles City, km*
Location 10
CR18-L01
CR16-L01
CR18-L02
CR 164.03
CR 164.06
CR16-L06
CR16-L07
CR16-L08
CR16-L09
CR18-L10
CR16-L11
Sample Date
10/23/2016
10/23/2016
10/23/2016
10/25/2018
10/23/2016
10123/2016
10/24/2016
10/24/2016
10/25/2016
10/24/2016
10/24/2016
N=Normat, FD=Field Duplicate
N
FD
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Parameter
Unit
WQS Aquatic'
Result
Qual
RL
Result
Qual
RL
Result
Qual
RL
Result Qual
RL
Result
Qual
RL
Result
Qual
RL
Result
Qual
RL
Result
Qual
RL
Result
Qual
RL
Result Qua!
RL
Result
Qual
RL
• ¦¦¦
Arsenic
ug/L
NS
12
13
12
1.3
24
1.3
93
1.3
140
1.3
510
1.3
32
1.3
180
1.3
69
1.3
1.5
1 3
1.4
1.3
Calcium
' ug/L
NS
120000
250
130000
1300
110000
250
NA
370000
2500
190000
?sno
NA
160000
1300
NA
95000
NA
Iron
ug/L
NS
6300
130
8500
130
2900
130
NA
6300
130
9600
130
m
460
130
NA
190
130
NA
ug/L
NS
22000
130
23000
130
31000
130
NA
42000
130
34000
130
NA
24000
130
NA
20000
130
NA
Arsenic
ug/L
150
5
1.3
5.9
1.3
15
1.3
12
1.3
120
1.3
230
1.3
30
1.3
160
1.3
71
1.3
2.9
1 3
1.3
1.3
Iron
ug/L
NS
<130
U
130
120
J
130
<130
U
130
NA
98
J
130
820
130
NA
< 130
U
130
NA
130
130
NA
frdijrii-u.ifai j"i Hjii.i. ii tf Tun Pajjirilwtiftnir.
Dissolved Organic Carbon
mg/L
NS
2.9
1
2.8
1
3
1
NA
9.8
1
5.6
1
NA
2.6
1
NA
1.8
1
NA
Hardness
mg/L
NS
400
6
430
30
410
8
NA
1100
60
650
60
NA
510
30
NA
320
«
NA
Hardness, Calcium Cartxsnate
mg/L
NS
300
3.1
320
16
280
3.1
NA
B10
31
470
31
NA
400
16
NA
240
3,1
NA
Hardness, Magnesium Carbonate
mg/L
NS
92
2.6
110
13
130
2.6
NA
230
26
180
26
NA
110
13
NA
81
26
NA
pH
pH units
NS
.
J
NA
7.7
J
NA
6.8
J
8.9
J
NA
7.3
J
NA
7.6
J
NA
Temperature
degc
NS
21.8
4
NA
21.7
J
NA
21.5
J
21.5
J
NA
21,5
J
NA
21.5
J
NA
Total Organic Carbon
mg/L
NS
3.5
1
3.5
1
3.9
1
NA
12
1
15
1
NA
2.7
1
NA
2
I
NA
MfiSSSI
1. Iowa Water Quality Standard (WQS) for aquatic life,
2. Exceedances of WQS* are shown in bold.
Abbreviations:
NA * not analyzed; only arsenic was analyzed for contingent
NS » standard not available
Qual = qualifier
RL = reporting limit
Units: mg/l - milligram per liter; ug/L = microgram per liter
AasMisai
J « estimated result
U - riot detected above RL
-------
May 2017 Tables ¦ 165-2829
Sediment Validated Analytical Results - Cedar River
LaSounty Landfill
Charles City, Iowa
Location ID
Sample Date
N=Nonrtal, FD=FieId Duplicate
CR18-LQ1-SD
10/23/2018
N
CR16-L01-SD
10/23/2016
PD
CR16-L02-SD
10/23/2016
N
CR16-L05-SD
10/23/2016
N
CR18-L06-SD
10/23/2016
N
CR16-L08-SD
10/24/2016
N
CR16-L10-SD
10/24/2016
N
CR16-L11-SD
10/24/2018
N
Parameter
Unit
Site-Specific
Exposure Sis1
DPC2
PEC3
Result Qual RL
Result Qual RL
Result Qual RL
Result Qual RL
Result Qual RL
Result Qual RL
Result Qual RL
Result Qual RL
¦; ; ¦¦¦.. ¦ - ! i i ¦¦ -¦ j- : |o.o?l §.9 I 10.0721 is i 10.0751 3.6 | i0.059
:¦ ;¦¦¦¦¦: : i 0.089
0.47 | | 0.07
tVct CheniiSl'V
Oxklation-Reduction Potential
millivolts
NSV
NSV
NSV
190
10
190
10
160
10
150
10
180
10
220
10
230
10
NA
——I
pH
pH units
NSV
NSV
NSV
7.6
J
0.1
7,7
J
0.1
IT*
J
0.1
7.5
J
0.1
7.5
J
0.1
7.8
J
0,1
7.7
J
0.1
Sulfate
mg'Kg
NSV
NSV
NSV
20
13
21
14
it
J
15
63
14
8.9
J
12
12
J
13
26
13
HA
Sulfide
mg/kg
NSV
NSV
NSV
66
J-
41
38
J
43
<44
U
44
490
46
<39
U
39
<40
U
<42
U
42
NA
Total Organic Carbon
mg/kg
NSV
NSV
NSV
13000
J
1400
12000
J
1400
25000
J
1500
16000
J
1500
2900
J
1300
11000
J
1300
13000
J
1400
NA
SmvsI
%
NSV
NSV
NSV
1.1
NA
5.1
0
0
0
0
NA
Sand
_
NSV
NSV
NSV
76,5
NA
62.2
82 8
97.2
81,4
73
IT
Silt. Clay, Colloids
%
NSV
NSV
NSV
22 4
NA
32.7
17,2
2,8
18.8
22.8
NA
None
1. Site-specific surface water exposure parameters screening levels fWtxk Plan
Appendix Table 6).
2. Dutch Permissible CoocentaOon (DPC) for sediment.
3. Permissible Exposure Concentrator! (PEC) from NOAA Screening Quick Reference
Tables.
4. There were no reported exceedances of the site-specific SV, DPC, or PEC.
emrnMsm
NSV - No Secreenlng Value established. SVs were established/selected only tor arsenic
as described in the approved Wort Plan.
HA - not analyzed
Quel - interpreted qualifier
RL - reporting limit
Units: mg/ltg * milligram per kilogram
QufliiSgm
J = estimated result
J-« estimated result; biased low
U = non-detect
G:\PROJECTS\2016 Pwh»ctt\ieK829 - Zwstts t
Page 1 of 1
Checked by JS 12/9/16, CG 12/15/18
-------
April 2018 Table 6 165-2829
Sub-Slab Soil Gas Validated Analytical Results
LaBounty Landfill
Charles City, Iowa
Sample ID
Sample Name
Sample Date
N=Normal, FD=Field Duplicate
LSS-01
VI16-LSS-01
9/13/2016
N
LSS-01
VI16-LSS-01
10/26/2016
N
LSS-01
VI17-LSS-01
3/29/2017
N
LSS-01
VI17-LSS-01
6/20/2017
N
LSS-02
VI16-LSS-02
9/13/2016
N
LSS-02
VI16-LSS-02
10/26/2016
N
Parameter
Unit
Sub-slab
Soil Gas
SL
Result Qual DL RL
Result Qual DL RL
Result Qual DL RL
Result Qual DL RL
Result Qual DL RL
Result Qual DL RL
1,1,2-T richloroethane
ug/m3
29
760
39
200
480
4.3
22
480
15
180
860
19
220
<24
U
24
120
<4.2
U
4.2
21
1,1-Dichloroethane
ug/m3
NS
< 18
U
18
150
<2
U
2
16
< 11
U
11
130
< 14
U
14
160
< 11
U
11
90
< 2
U
2
16
1,1-Dichloroethene -
ug/m3
29333
21000
26
140
26000
28
160
12000
23
130
17000
28
160
10000
16
88
9900
14
80
1,2-Dichloroethane
ug/m3
157
< 30
U
30
150
<3.3
U
3.3
16
< 23
U
23
130
< 28
U
28
160
< 18
U
18
90
< 3.3
U
3.3
16
Benzene
ug/m3
533
32
J
24
120
18
2.7
13
< 15
u
15
100
19
J
18
130
< 15
U
15
71
2.7
J
2.6
13
Chloroform
ug/m3
177
< 72
U
72
180
14
J
8
20
27
J
20
160
<25
U
25-
200
<44
U
44
110
<7.9
U
7.9
19
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ug/m3
NS
910
25
140
720
2.8
16
59
J
19
130
120
J
23
160
< 15
U
15
88
3.5
J
2.7
16
Tetrachloroethene
ug/m3
6000
20000
28
250
22000
31
270
9400
11
220
17000
13
270
930
17
150
620
3.1
27
Trichloroethene
ug/m3
200
1300
38
190
820
4.2
21
270
8
180
470
9.8
220
82
J
23
120
45
4.1
21
Vinyl Chloride
ug/m3
933
23
J
15
93
22
1.6
10
< 7.5
u
7.5
84
< 9.2
U
9.2
100
<9.1
u
9.1
57
< 1.6
U
1.6
10
Notes:
1.) Vapor Intrusion Evaluation Screening
Levels from Table 7 of Work Plan Response
to Fifth 5-Year Review LaBounty Landfill
Site (Golder, 2016a).
2.) Results that exceed the screening level
are shown in bold font.
3.) Non-Detect results with detection limits
above screening levels are shown in
underlined font. Detection limits in excess
of screening levels are due to elevated
concentration(s) of other constituents in the
sample.
Abbreviations:
NS = no screening level available
Qual = interpreted qualifier
DL = detection limit
RL = reporting limit
ug/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter
Qualifiers:
J = estimated result
U = non-detect
Checked by: JAS 3/28/2018
Golder Associates
G:\PROJECTS\2016 Projects\1652829 - Zoetis Charles City\200 Reports\Summary Reports\LaBounty\Revised RTC\Tables\ /afflGolder
Table 6 update.xisx Associates
-------
. April 2018 Table 6 165-2829
Sub-Slab Soil Gas Validated Analytical Results
LaBounty Landfill
Charles City, Iowa
Sample ID
Sample Name
Sample Date
N=Normal, FD=Field Duplicate
LSS-02
VI17-LSS-02
6/20/2017
N
LSS-03
VI16-LSS-03
9/13/2016
N
LSS-03
VI16-LSS-03
10/26/2016
N
LSS-03
VI16-LDUP-02
10/26/2016
FD
LSS-03
VI17-LSS-03
3/29/2017
N
LSS-03
VI17-LSS-03
6/20/2017
N
Parameter
Unit
Sub-slab
Soil Gas
SL
Result Qual DL RL
Result Qual DL RL
Result Qual DL RL
Result Qual DL RL
Result Qual DL RL
Result Qual DL RL
1,1,2-T richloroethane
ug/m3
29
< 10
U
10
120
< 110
U
110
560
<3.4
U
3.4
18
<4.2
U
4.2
21
<6.3
' U
6.3
74
< 44
U
44
520
1,1-Dichloroethane
ug/m3
NS
< 7.6
U
7.6
90
<52
U
52
410
< 1.6
U
1.6
13
< 2
U
2
16
< 23
U
23
280
< 33
U
33
390
1,1-Dichloroethene
ug/m3
29333
11000
15
88
27000
73
400
40000
J
42
240
4300
J
5.6
31
30000
47
270
32000
66
380
1,2-Dichloroethane
ug/m3
157
< 15
U
15
90
< 84
U
84
410
< 2.7
U
2.7
13
<3.3
U
3.3
16
<47
U
47
280
< 66
U
66
390
Benzene
ug/m3
533
< 9.9
U
9.9
71
< 68
U
68
330
3.3
J
2.2
10
4.3
J
2.6
13
< 30
U
30
220
<43
u
43
300
Chloroform
ug/m3
177
< 14
U
14
110
< 200
U
200
500
< 6.4
U
6.4
16
13
J
7.9
19
<42
U
42
330
< 58
u
58
460
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ug/m3
NS
< 13
U
13
88
< 71
U
71
400
< 2.2
U
2.2
13
<2.7
U
2.7
16
< 39
U
39
270
< 55
u
55
380
Tetrachloroethene
ug/m3
6000
770
7.4
150
1100
79
690
2000
J
2.5
22
760
J
3.1
27
1900
23 '
460
1700
32
650
Trichloroethene
ug/m3
200
62
J
5.4
120
< 110
U
110
550
63
3.4
17
36
4.1
21
< 17
U
17
370
59
J
23
510
Vinyl Chloride
ug/m3
933
< 5.1
U
5.1
57
<42
U
42
260
< 1.3
u
1.3
8.2
6.2
J
1.6
10
< 16
U
16
170
< 22
u
22
240
Notes:
1.) Vapor Intrusion Evaluation Screening
Levels from Table 7 of Work Plan Response
to Fifth 5-Year Review LaBounty Landfill
Site (Golder, 2016a).
2.) Results that exceed the screening level
are shown in bold font.
3.) Non-Detect results with detection limits
above screening levels are shown in
underlined font. Detection limits in excess
of screening levels are due to elevated
concentration(s) of other constituents in the
sample.
Abbreviations:
NS = no screening level available :
Qual = interpreted qualifier
DL = detection limit
RL = reporting limit
ug/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter
Qualifiers:
J = estimated result
U = non-detect
Checked by: JAS 3/28/2018
Golder Associates
G:\PROJECTS\2016 Projects\1652829 - Zoetis Charles City\200 Reports\Summary Reports\LaBounty\Revised RTC\Tables\ /JJwGolder
Table 6 update.xlsx A'iSflfifltffi
-------
April 2018 Table 6 165-2829
Sub-Slab Soil Gas Validated Analytical Results
LaBounty Landfill
Charles City, Iowa
Sample ID
Sample Name
Sample Date
N=Normal, FD=Field Duplicate
LSS-04
VI16-LSS-04
9/13/2016
N
LSS-04
VI16-LSS-04
10/26/2016
N
LSS-04
VI17-LSS-04
3/29/2017
N
LSS-04
VI17-LSS-04
6/20/2017
N
LSS-05
VI16-LSS-05
9/13/2016
N
LSS-05
VI16-LSS-05
10/26/2016
N
Parameter
Unit
Sub-slab
Soil Gas
SL
Result Qual DL RL
Result Qual DL RL
Result Qual DL RL
Result Qual DL RL
Result Qual DL RL
Result Qual DL RL
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ug/m3
29
<0.21
U
0.21
1.1
< 3.7
U
3.7
19
<2
U
2
24
<4.6
U
4.6
54
< 280
U
280
1400
< 13
U
13
64
1,1-Dichloroethane
ug/m3
NS
• < 0.1
U
0.1
0.81
< 1.8
U
1.8
14
< 1.5
U
1.5
18
< 3.4
U
3.4
40
< 130
U
130
1100
< 6
U
6
48
1,1-Dichloroethene
ug/m3
29333
46
0.14
0.79
2000
2.5
14
1700
3
17
1800
J
6.9
39
48000
190
1000
43000
53
290
1,2-Dichloroethane
ug/m3
157
< 0.17
U
0.17
0.81
< 2.9
U
2.9
14
< 3
U
3
18
< 6.8
U
6.8
40
< 220
U
220
1100
< 9.8
U
9.8
48
Benzene
ug/m3
533
3.8
0.13
0.64
< 2.4
U
2.4
11
<2
U
2
14
4.5
J
4.4
32
< 180
U
180
840
<7.9
U
7.9
38
Chloroform
ug/m3
177
< 0.4
U
0.4
0.98
< 7
U
7
17
< 2.7
U
2.7
21
<6
u
6
48
< 520
U
520
1300
24
J
24
58
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ug/m3
NS
< 0.14
U
0.14
0.79
<2.4
U
2.4
14
< 2.5
U
2.5
17
<5.7
u
5.7
39
< 180
U
180
1000
9.3
J
8.2
47
Tetrachloroethene
ug/m3
6000
25
0.16
1.4
430
27
24
470
1.5
30
310
J
3.3
67
4700
200
1800
4600
• 9.2
80
Trichloroethene
ug/m3
200
0.26
J
0.21
1.1
5.5
J
3.7
19
< 1.1
U.
1.1
24
9.1
J
2.4
53
< 270
U
270
1400
140
12
63
Vinyl Chloride
ug/m3
933
< 0.082
U
0.082
0.51
< 1.4
U
14
9
< 1
U
1
11
< 2.3
u
2.3
25
< 110
U
110
670
<4.8
U
4.8
30
Notes:
1.) Vapor Intrusion Evaluation Screening
Levels from Table 7 of Work Plan Response
to Fifth 5-Year Review LaBounty Landfill
Site (Golder, 2016a).
2.) Results that exceed the screening level
are shown in bold font.
3.) Non-Detect results with detection limits
above screening levels are shown in
underlined font. Detection limits in excess
of screening levels are due to elevated
concentration(s) of other constituents in the
sample.
Abbreviations:
NS = no screening level available
Qual = interpreted qualifier
DL = detection limit
RL = reporting limit
ug/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter
Qualifiers:
J = estimated result
U = non-detect
Checked by: JAS 3/28/2018
Golder Associates
G:\PROJECTS\2016Projects\1652829-ZoetisCharlesCity\200Reports\SummaryReports\LaBounty\RevisedRTC\Tables\ /*FGolder
Table 6 update.xlsx
-------
April 2018 Table 6 165-2829
Sub-Slab Soil Gas Validated Analytical Results
LaBounty Landfill
Charles City, Iowa
Sample ID
Sample Name
Sample Date
N=Normal, FD=Field Duplicate
LSS-05
VI17-LDUP-02
6/20/2017
FD
LSS-05
VI17-LSS-05
'3/29/2017
N
LSS-05
VI17-LDUP-02
3/29/2017
FD
LSS-05
VI17-LSS-05
6/20/2017
N
LSS-06
VI16-LSS-06
9/13/2016
N
LSS-06
VI16-LSS-06
10/26/2016
N
Parameter
Unit
Sub-slab
Soil Gas
SL
Result Qual DL RL
Result Qual DL RL
Result Qual DL RL
Result Qual DL RL
Result Qual DL RL
Result Qual DL RL
1,1,2-T richloroethane
ug/m3
29
< 37
U
37
440
< 39
U
39
460
< 23
U
23
270
< 37
U
37
430
< 1.1
U
1.1
5.5
<4.2
U
4.2
21
1,1-Dichloroethane
ug/m3
NS
< 28
U
28
330
< 29
U
29
340'
< 17 '
U
17
200
< 27
U
27
320
< 0.51
U
0.51
4
<2
U
2
16
1,1-Dichloroethene
ug/m3
29333
33000
56
320
37000
58
330
36000
34
200
31000
55
310
350
0.71
4
3600
4.3
24
1,2-Dichloroethane
ug/m3
157
< 55
U
55
330
< 58
u
58
340
< 34
U
34
200
< 54
U
54
320
< 0.83
U
0.83
4
< 3.3
U
3.3
16
Benzene
ug/m3
533
< 36
U
36
260
< 37
u
37
270
< 22
u
22
160
< 35
U
35
250
2.9
J
0.67
3.2
3.9
J
2.6
13
Chloroform
ug/m3
177
< 49
U
49
390
< 51
u
51
410
< 30
u
30
240
<48
U
48
390
11
2
4.9
9.7
J
7.9
19
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ug/m3
NS
<46
U
46
320
<48
u
48
330
< 28
u
28
200
<46
U
46
310
<0.69
U
0.69
4
<2.7
U
2.7
16
Tetrachloroethene
ug/m3
6000
4400
27
550
8400
J
28
570
5000
J
16
330
4200
26
540
800
0.78
6.8
590
3.1
27
Trichloroethene
ug/m3
200
110
J
20
430
< 20
u
20
450
< 12
u
12
260
110
J
19
430
53
1
5.4
19
J
4.1
21
Vinyl Chloride
ug/m3
933
< 19
U
19
210
< 19
u
19
210
<11
u
11
130
< 18
U
18
200
< 0.41
U
0.41
2.6
. 5
J
1.6
10
Notes:
1.) Vapor Intrusion Evaluation Screening
Levels from Table 7 of Work Plan Response
to Fifth 5-Year Review LaBounty Landfill
Site (Golder, 2016a).
2.) Results that exceed the screening level
are shown in bold font.
3.) Non-Detect results with detection limits
above screening levels are shown in
underlined font. Detection limits in excess
of screening levels are due to elevated
concentration(s) of other constituents in the
sample.
Abbreviations:
NS = no screening level available
Qual = interpreted qualifier
DL = detection limit
RL = reporting limit
ug/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter
Qualifiers:
J = estimated result
U = non-detect
Checked by: JAS 3/28/2018
Golder Associates _;T~L
G:\PROJECTS\2016 Projects\1652829 - Zoetis Charles City\200 Reports\Summary Reports\LaBounty\Revised RTC\Tables\ f*pGoWer
Table 6 update.xlsx VErXssociates
-------
April 2018 Table 6
Sub-Slab Soil Gas Validated Analytical Results
LaBounty Landfill
Charles City, Iowa
Sample ID
Sample Name
Sample Date
N=Normal, FD=Field Duplicate
LSS-06
VI17-LSS-06
3/29/2017
N
LSS-06
VI17-LSS-06
6/20/2017
N
LSS-07
VI16-LSS-07
9/13/2016
N
Parameter
Unit
Sub-slab
Soil Gas
SL
Result Qual DL RL
Result Qual DL RL
Result Qual DL RL
1,1,2-T richloroethane
ug/m3
29
<4.2
U
4.2
50
< 1.6
U
1.6
18
<0.21
U
0.21
1.1
1,1-Dichloroethane
ug/m3
NS
< 3.1
U
3.1
37
< 1.2
U
1.2
14
< 0.1
U
0.1
0.81
1,1-Dichloroethene
ug/m3
29333
4000
6.3
36
1600
J
2.3
13
<0.14
U
0.14
0.79
1,2-Dichloroethane
ug/m3
157
<6.3
U
6.3
37
<2.3
U
2.3
14
0.35
J
0.17
0.81
Benzene
ug/m3
533
<4.1
U
4.1
29
53
J
1.5
11
0.53
J
0.13
0.64
Chloroform
ug/m3
177
< 5.6
U
5.6
45
< 2.1
U
2.1
28
< 0.4
U
0.4
0.98
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ug/m3
NS
< 5.3
U
5.3
36
< 1.9
U
1.9
13
<0.14
U
0.14
0.79
Tetrachloroethene
ug/m3
6000
400
3
62
610
J
1.1
23
0.21
J
0.16
1.4
Trichloroethene
ug/m3
200
< 2.2
u
2.2
49
31
J
0.83
18
<0.21
U
0.21
' 1.1
Vinyl Chloride
ug/m3
933
<2.1
u
2.1
23
3.6
J
0.78
8.6
< 0.082
U
0.082
0.51
Notes:
1.) Vapor Intrusion Evaluation Screening
Levels from Table 7 of Work Plan Response
to Fifth 5-Year Review LaBounty Landfill
Site (Golder, 2016a).
2.) Results that exceed the screening level
are shown in bold font.
3.) Non-Detect results with detection limits
above screening levels are shown in ¦
underlined font. Detection limits in excess
of screening levels are due to elevated
concentration(s) of other constituents in the
sample.
Abbreviations:
NS = no screening level available
Qual = interpreted qualifier
DL = detection limit
RL = reporting limit
ug/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter
Qualifiers:
J = estimated result
U = non-detect
Golder Associates
G:\PROJECTS\2016 ProjectsM 652829 - Zoetis Charles City\200 Reports\Summary Reports\LaBounty\Revised RTC\Tables\
Table 6 update.xlsx
-------
April 2018 Table 7 165-2829
Indoor and Ambient Air Validated Analytical Results
LaBounty Landfill Site
Charles City, Iowa
Sample ID
LAA-01
LAA-01
LIA-01
LIA-01
Sample Name
VI17-LAA-01
VI17-LAA-01
V116-LIA-01
V117-LIA-01
Sample Date
3/29/2017
6/19/2017
10/25/2016
3/29/2017
N=Normal, FD=Field Duplicate
N
N
N
N
Parameter
Unit
Indoor Air SL
Result
Qual
DL
RL
Result
Qual
DL
RL
Result
Qual
DL
RL
Result
Qual
DL
RL
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ug/m3
0.88
< 0.093
U
0.093
1.1
< 0.093
U
0.093
1.1
0.51
J
0.21
1.1
< 0.093
U
0.093
1.1
1,1-Dichloroethane
ug/m3
NS
< 0.069
U
0.069
0.81
< 0.069
U
0.069
0.81
< 0.1
U
0.1
0.81
< 0.069
U
0.069
0.81
1,1-Dichloroethene
ug/m3
880
<0.14
U
0.14
0.79
< 0.14
U
0.14
0.79
29
0.14
0.79
3.9
0.14
0.79
1,2-Dichloroethane
ug/m3
4.7
<0.14
U
0.14
0.81
<0.14
U
0.14
0.81
<0.17
U
0.17
0.81
< 0.14 .
U
0.14
0.81
Benzene
ug/m3
16
< 0.089
U
0.089
0.64
0.2
J
0.089
0.64
11
0.13
0.64
2.8
0.089
0.64
Chloroform
ug/m3
5.3
<0.12
U
0.12
0.98
< 0.12
U
0.12
0.98
<0.4
U
0.4
0.98
<0.12
U
0.12
0.98
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ug/m3
NS
<0.11
U
0.11
0.79
< 0.11
U
0.11
0.79
<0.14
U
0.14
0.79
<0.11
U
0.11
0.79
Tetrachloroethene
ug/m3
180
3.8
0.066
1.4
0.22
J
0.066
1.4
28
0.16
1.4
10
0.066
1.4
Trichloroethene
ug/m3
6
< 0.049
U
0.049
1.1
< 0.049
U
0.049
1.1
3
0.21
1.1
< 0.049
U
0.049
1.1
Vinyl Chloride
ug/m3
28
<0.046
U
0.046
0.51
< 0.046
U
0.046
0.51
< 0.082
U ¦
0.082
0.51
< 0.046
U
0.046
0.51
Notes:
1.) Vapor Intrusion Evaluation Screening Levels from
Table 2 of the Vapor Intrusion Work Plan Addendum
LaBounty Landfill Site (Golder, 2017)
2.) Results that exceed the
screening level are bolded.
Abbreviations:
NS = no screening level available
Qual = interpreted qualifier
DL = detection limit
RL = reporting limit
ug/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter
Qualifiers:
J = estimated result
U = non-detect
\\mtlaurel\MTL Data\Data\PROJECTS\2016 Projects\1652829
Table 7 update.xlsx
Golder Associates
¦ Zoetis Charles City\200 ReportsNSummary Reports\LaBounty\Revised RTC\
Checked by: JAS 3/28/2018
,. Golder
Associates
-------
April 2018 Table 7 165-2829
Indoor and Ambient Air Validated Analytical Results
LaBounty Landfill Site
Charles City, Iowa
Sample ID
LIA-01
LIA-02
LIA-02
LIA-02
Sample Name
VI17-LIA-01
VI16-LIA-02
VI17-LIA-02
VI17-LIA-02
Sample Date
6/19/2017
10/25/2016
3/29/2017
6/19/2017
N=Normal, FD=Field Duplicate
N
N
N
N
Parameter
Unit
Indoor Air SL
Result
Qual
DL
RL
Result
Qual
DL
RL
Result
Qual
DL
RL
Result
Qual
DL
RL
1,1,2-T richloroethane
ug/m3
0.88
< 0.093
U
0.093
1.1
< 0.21
U
0.21
1.1
< 0.093
U
0.093
1.1
< 0.093
U
0.093
1.1
1,1-Dichloroethane
ug/m3
NS
< 0.069
U
0.069
0.81
<0.1
U
0.1
0.81
< 0.069
U
0.069
0.81
< 0.069
U
0.069
0.81
1,1-Dichloroethene
ug/m3
880
0.7
J
0.14
0.79
20
0.14
0.79
2.9
0.14
0.79
0.77
J
0.14
0.79
1,2-Dichloroethane
ug/m3
4.7
< 0.14
U
0.14
0.81
<0.17
U
0.17
0.81
<0.14
U
0.14
0.81
<0.14
U
0.14
0.81
Benzene
ug/m3
16
0.95
0.089
0.64
7.9
0.13
0.64
2.3
0.089
0.64
0.74
0.089
0.64
Chloroform
ug/m3
5.3
< 0.12
U
0.12
0.98
<0.4
U
0.4
0.98
<0.12
U
0.12
0.98
< 0.12
U
0.12
0.98
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ug/m3
NS
< 0.11
U
0.11
0.79
< 0.14
U
0.14
0.79
<0.11
U
0.11
0.79
< 0.11
U
0.11
0.79
Tetrachloroethene
ug/m3
180
1.5
0.066
1.4
27
0.16
14
7.6
0.066
1.4
1.3
J
0.066
1.4
Trichloroethene -
ug/m3
6
0.09
J
0.049
1.1
2.8
0.21
1.1
< 0.049
U
0.049
1.1
0.083
J
0.049
1.1
Vinyl Chloride
ug/m3
28
< 0.046
U
0:046
0.51
< 0.082
U
0.082
0.51
< 0.046
U
0.046
0.51
< 0.046
U
0.046
0.51
Notes:
1.) Vapor Intrusion Evaluation Screening Levels from
Table 2 of the Vapor Intrusion Work Plan Addendum
LaBounty Landfill Site (Golder, 2017)
2.) Results that exceed the
screening level are bolded.
Abbreviations:
NS = no screening level available
Qual = interpreted qualifier
DL = detection limit
RL = reporting limit
ug/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter
Qualifiers:
J = estimated result :
U = non-detect
\\mtlaurel\MTL Data\Data\PROJECTS\2016 Projects\1652829
Table 7 update.xlsx
Golder Associates
¦ Zoetis Charles City\200 Reports\Summary Reports\LaBounty\Revised RTC\
Checked by: JAS 3/28/2018
Golder
Associates
-------
April 2018 Table 7 165-2829
Indoor and Ambient Air Validated Analytical Results
LaBounty Landfill Site
Charles City, Iowa
Sample ID
LIA-03
LIA-03
LIA-03
LIA-04
Sample Name
VI16-LIA-03
V117-LIA-03
VI17-LIA-03
VI16-LIA-04
Sample Date
10/25/2016
3/29/2017
6/19/2017
10/25/2016
N=Normal, FD=Field Duplicate
N
N
N
N
Parameter
Unit
Indoor Air SL
Result
Qual
DL
RL
Result
Qual
DL
RL
Result
Qual
DL
RL
Result
Qual
DL
RL
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ug/m3
0.88
< 0.21
U
0.21
1.1
< 0.093
U
0.093
1.1
< 0.093
U
0.093
1.1
<0.21
U
0.21
1.1
1,1-Dichloroethane
ug/m3
NS
<0.1
U
0.1
0.81
< 0.069
U
0.069
0.81
< 0.069
U
0.069
0.81
<0.1
U
0.1 -
0.81
1,1-Dichloroethene
ug/m3
880
11
0.14
0.79
29
0.14
0.79
6.3
0.14
0.79
10
0.14
0.79
1,2-Dichloroethane
ug/m3
4.7
<0.17
U
0.17
0.81
<0.14
U
0.14
0.81
0.25
J
0.14
0.81
<0.17
U
0.17
0.81
Benzene
ug/m3
16
21
0.13
0.64
18
0.089
0.64
0.84
0.089
0.64
17
0.13
0.64
Chloroform
ug/m3
5.3
<0.4
U
0.4
0.98
<0.12
U
0.12
0.98
<0.12
u
0.12
0.98
< 0.4
U
0.4
0.98
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ug/m3
NS
0.22
J
0.14
0.79
<0.11
u
0.11
0.79
<0.11
u
0.11
0.79
0.15
J
0.14
0.79
Tetrachloroethene
ug/m3
180
150
0.16
1.4
2000
3.4
70
57
0.066
1.4
120
0.16
1.4
T richloroethene
ug/m3
6
0.63
J
0.21
1.1
< 0.049
u
0.049
1.1
< 0.049
u
0.049
1.1
0.53
J
0.21
1.1
Vinyl Chloride
ug/m3
28
0.92
0.082
0.51
< 0.046
u
0.046
0.51
< 0.046
u
0.046
0.51
0.64
0.082
0.51
Notes:
1.) Vapor Intrusion Evaluation Screening Levels from
Table 2 of the Vapor Intrusion Work Plan Addendum
LaBounty Landfill Site (Golder, 2017)
2.) Results that exceed the
screening level are bolded.
Abbreviations:
NS = no screening level available
Qual = interpreted qualifier
DL = detection limit
RL = reporting limit
ug/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter
Qualifiers:
J = estimated result
U = non-detect
\\mtlaurel\MTL Data\Data\PROJECTS\2016 Projects\1652829
Table 7 update.xlsx
Golder Associates
• Zoetis Charles City\200 Reports\Summary Reports\LaBounty\Revised RTC\
Checked by: JAS 3/28/2018
Golder
Associates
-------
April 2018 Table 7 165-2829
Indoor and Ambient Air Validated Analytical Results
LaBounty Landfill Site
Charles City, Iowa
Sample ID
LIA-04
LIA-04
LIA-05
LIA-05
Sample Name
VI17-LIA-04
VI17-LIA-04
VI16-LIA-05
VI17-LDUP-01
Sample Date
3/29/2017
6/19/2017
10/25/2016
3/29/2017
N=Normal, FD=Field Duplicate
N
N
N
FD
Parameter
Unit
Indoor Air SL
Result
Qual
DL
RL
Result
Qual
DL
RL
Result
Qual
DL
RL
Result
Qual
DL
RL
1,1,2-TricMloroethane
ug/m3
0.88
< 0.093
U
0.093
1.1
< 0.093
U
0.093
1.1
<0.21
U
0.21
1.1
< 0.093
U
0.093
1.1
1,1-Dichloroethane
ug/m3
NS
< 0.069
U
0.069
0.81
< 0.069
U
0.069
0.81
<0.1
U
0.1
0.81
< 0.069
U
0.069
0.81
1,1-Dichloroethene
ug/m3
880
24
0.14
0.79
5.9
0.14
0.79
2.1
0.14
0.79
9.7
0.14
0.79
1,2-Dichloroethane
ug/m3
4.7
< 0.14
U
0.14
0.81
0.24
J
0.14
0.81
< 0.17
U
0.17
0.81
<0.14
U
0.14
0.81
Benzene
ug/m3
16
13
0.089
0.64
0.8
0.089
0.64
2
0.13
0.64
15
0.089
0.64
Chloroform
ug/m3
5.3
< 0.12
U
0.12
0.98
< 0.12
U
0.12
0.98
<0.4
U
0.4
0.98
<0.12
U
0.12
0.98
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ug/m3
NS
<0.11
U
0.11
0.79
<0.11
U
0.11
0.79
<0.14
u
0.14
0.79
<0.11
U
0.11
0.79
Tetrachloroethene
ug/m3
180
1500
2.8
57
55
0.066
1.4
79
0.16
1.4
11000
3.6
74
Trichloroethene
ug/m3
6
< 0.049
U
0.049
1.1
< 0.049
U
0.049
1.1
<0.21
u
0.21
1.1
< 0.049
U
0.049
1.1
Vinyl Chloride
ug/m3
28
0.19
J
0.046
0.51
< 0.046
U
0.046
0.51
0.47
J
0.082
0.51
0.2
J
0.046
0.51
Notes:
1.) Vapor Intrusion Evaluation Screening Levels from
Table 2 of the Vapor Intrusion Work Plan Addendum
LaBounty Landfill Site (Golder, 2017)
2.) Results that exceed the
screening level are bolded.
Abbreviations:
NS = no screening level available
Qual = interpreted qualifier
DL = detection limit
RL = reporting limit
ug/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter
Qualifiers:
J = estimated result
U = non-detect
\\mtlaurel\MTL Data\Data\PROJECTS\2016 Projects\1652829
Table 7 update.xlsx
Golder Associates
¦ Zoetis Charles City\200 Reports\Summary Reports\LaBounty\Revised RTC\
Checked by: JAS 3/28/2018
Golder
Associates
-------
April 2018 Table 7 165-2829
Indoor and Ambient Air Validated Analytical Results
LaBounty Landfill Site
Charles City, Iowa
Sample ID
LIA-05
LIA-05
LIA-05
LIA-06
Sample Name
VI17-LDUP-01
VI17-LIA-05
VI17-LIA-05
VI16-LDUP-01
Sample Date
6/19/2017
3/29/2017
6/19/2017
10/25/2016
N=Normal, FD=Field Duplicate
FD
N
N
FD
Parameter
Unit
Indoor Air SL
Result
Qual
DL
RL
Result
Qual
DL
RL
Result
Qual
DL
RL
Result
Qual
DL
RL
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ug/m3
0.88
< 0.093
U
0.093
1.1
< 0.093
U
0.093
1.1
< 0.093
U
0.093
1.1
<0.21
U
0.21
1.1
1,1-Dichloroethane
ug/m3
NS
< 0.069
U
0.069
0.81
< 0.069
U
0.069
0.81
< 0.069
U
0.069
0.81
<0.1
U
0.1
0.81
1,1-Dichloroethene
ug/m3
880
< 0.14
U
0.14
0.79
10
0.14
0.79
<0.14
U
0.14
0.79
3.7
0.14
0.79
1,2-Dichloroethane
ug/m3
4.7
< 0.14
(J
0.14
0.81
<0.14
u
0.14
0.81 ¦
<0.14
U
0.14
0.81
< 0.17
U
0.17
0.81
Benzene
ug/m3
16
0.14
J
0.089
0.64
14
0.089
0.64
0.14
J
0.089
0.64
3.4
0.13
0.64
Chloroform
ug/m3
5.3
< 0.12
U
0.12
0.98
<0.12
u
0.12
0.98
<0.12
U
0.12
0.98
< 0.4
U
0.4
0.98
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ug/m3
NS
<0.11
U
0.11
0.79
<0.11
u
0.11
0.79
<0.11
u
0.11
0.79
<0.14
U
0.14
0.79
Tetrachloroethene
ug/m3
180
3.1
0.066
1.4
9400
3.5
71
3.7
0.066
1.4
190
0.16
1.4
T richloroethene
ug/m3
6
< 0.049
U
0.049
1.1
< 0.049
u
0.049
1.1
< 0.049
u
0.049
1.1
0.46
J
0.21
1.1
Vinyl Chloride
ug/m3
28
< 0.046
U
0.046
0.51
< 0.046
u
0.046
0.51
< 0.046
u
0.046
0.51
0.13
J
0.082
0.51
Notes:
1.) Vapor Intrusion Evaluation Screening Levels from
Table 2 of the Vapor Intrusion Work Plan Addendum
LaBounty Landfill Site (Golder, 2017)
2.) Results that exceed the
screening level are bolded.
Abbreviations:
NS = no screening level available
Qual = interpreted qualifier
DL = detection limit
RL = reporting limit
ug/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter
Qualifiers:
J = estimated result
U = non-detect
\\mtlaurel\MTL Data\Data\PROJECTS\2016 Projects\1652829
Table 7 update.xlsx
Golder Associates
¦ Zoetis Charles City\200 Reports\Summary Reports\LaBounty\Revised RTC\
Checked by: JAS 3/28/2018
. Golder .
Associates
-------
April 2018 - Table 7 165-2829
Indoor and Ambient Air Validated Analytical Results
LaBounty Landfill Site
Charles City, Iowa
Sample ID
LIA-06
LIA-06
LIA-06
Sample Name
VI16-LIA-06
VI17-LIA-06
VI17-LIA-06
Sample Date
10/25/2016
3/29/2017
6/19/2017
N=Normal, FD=Field Duplicate
N
N
N
Parameter
Unit
Indoor Air SL
Result
Qual
DL
RL
Result
Qual
DL
RL
Result
Qual
DL
RL
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
ug/m3
0.88
<0.21
U
0.21
1.1
< 0.093
U
0.093
1.1
< 0.093
U
0.093
1.1
1,1-Dichloroethane
ug/m3
NS
<0.1
U
0.1
0.81
< 0.069
U
0.069
0.81
< 0.069
U
0.069
0.81
1,1-Dichloroethene
ug/m3
880
3.7
0.14
0.79
11
0.14
0.79
<0.14
U
0.14
0.79
1,2-Dichloroethane
ug/m3
4.7
< 0.17
U
0.17
0.81
< 0.14
U
0.14
0.81
0.21
J
0.14
0.81
Benzene
ug/m3
16
3.7
0.13
0.64
6.4
0.089
0.64
0.35
J
0.089
0.64
Chloroform
ug/m3
5.3
<0.4
U
0.4
0.98
<0.12
U
0.12
0.98
<0.12
U
0.12
0.98
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
ug/m3
NS
< 0.14
U
0.14
0.79
< 0.11
U
0.11
0.79
<0.11
U
0.11
0.79
Tetrachloroethene
ug/m3
180
170
0.16
1.4
9700
2.7
55
33
0.066
1.4
Trichloroethene
ug/m3
6
0.48
J
0.21
1.1
< 0.049
U-
0.049
1.1
0.14
J
0.049
1.1
Vinyl Chloride
ug/m3
28
< 0.082
U
0.082
0.51
< 0.046
U
0.046
0.51
< 0.046
U
0.046
0.51
Notes:
1.) Vapor Intrusion Evaluation Screening Levels from
Table 2 of the Vapor Intrusion Work Plan Addendum
LaBounty Landfill Site (Golder, 2017)
2.) Results that exceed the
screening level are bolded.
Abbreviations:
NS = no screening level available
Qual = interpreted qualifier
DL = detection limit
RL = reporting limit
ug/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter
Qualifiers:
J = estimated result
U = non-detect
\\mtlaurel\MTL Data\Data\PROJECTS\2016 Projects\1652829
Table 7 update.xlsx
Golder Associates
- Zoetis Charles City\200 Reports\Summary Reports\LaBounty\Revised RTC\
Checked by: JAS 3/28/2018
Golder
Associates
-------
December 2017 Table 8 165-2829
Proposed Monitoring and Maintenance Plan Modifications
LaBounty Landfill
Charles City, Iowa
Activity Description
Proposed Modification to Scope1
Site Inspection
None
Site Groundwater Level Measurements
None
Groundwater Monitoring:
Lower Cedar Valley (LCVA) Bedrock
Wells
None
Groundwater Monitoring:
Upper Cedar Valley (UCVA) Bedrock
and Alluvium Wells
None
Upgradient Groundwater Diversion
System (LBTD) Compliance
None
Cedar River Monitoring
Surface water sampling will occur on an
annual basis and sampling point will be
relocated directly downstream of CR16-L06
(see Figure 2).
Building Inspection2
Two occupied buildings included in VI
investigation will be inspected on an annual
basis to confirm no significant changes in
condition or use. See Appendix E for Building
Inspection Survey.
Reporting
None ,
Notes:
1) See LaBounty Disposal Site Maintenance and Monitoring (M&M) Program for
additional details on activity scope and frequency.
2) Inspection of the two occupied buildings was not previously included in the LaBounty
M&M Program.
Checked by: KSG 12/13/17
Reviewed by: PSF 12/21/17
\\mtlaurel\MTL Data\Data\PROJECTS\2016 Projects\1652829 - Zoetis Charles City\200 Reports\Summary Reports\LaBounty\Revised\Tables\Table 8 - Monit
-------
FIGURES
-------
16JH AVE
Riverside
—lCernH
10TH AVE
9 THAVE'
¦8THAVE
K 6THAVE
^ * >
SITE LOCATION
Calvary.
'Cem i
REFERENCE(S)
1. BASE TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS FROM 7.5 MINUTE U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLES OF CHARLES CITY,
IOWA DATED 2015.
° 1000
1" = 2000' FEET
CLIENT PROJECT
ZOETIS RESPONSE TO FIFTH 5-YEAR REVIEW
LABOUNTY LANDFILL SITE
YYYY-MM-DD 2017-05-10 TITLE
SITE LOCATION MAP
DESIGNED
AM
PREPARED
CSG
REVIEWED
SLB
PROJECT NO. CONTROL REV. FIGURE
1652829 C003 0 1
200TH AVEm
UJ
_ ti
215 ST
-------
sarosen
[cRi6Z-tri;ii
RECREATIONAL CAMPGROUND PROPERTY
LABOUNTY LANDFILL SITE!
[CR'lj6;tf0j|
ISHAW AVENUE DUMP SITE
LEGEND
O CEDAR RIVER USGS MONITORING STATION
GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
O LABOUNTY SITE CEDAR RIVER PRIMARY SAMPLE LOCATION (SEE NOTES 1 AND 2)
LABOUNTY SITE CEDAR RIVER CONTINGENT SAMPLE LOCATION (SEE NOTES 1 AND 2)
O SHAW SITE CEDAR RIVER PRIMARY SAMPLE LOCATION (SEE NOTE 3)
|_| RECREATIONAL CAMPGROUND PROPERTY BOUNDARY
|_J SHAW AVENUE DUMP SITE
| | FORMER CHEMICAL FILL AREA
DIVERSION WALL
|_J LABOUNTY LANDFILL SITE BOUNDARY
iza LANDFILL
CEDAR RIVER FLOW DIRECTION
• PROPOSED CEDAR RIVER MONITORING LOCATION
(SEE NOTE 4)
NOTE(S)
1. CEDAR RIVER SAMPLES V«RE COLLECTED ON OCTOBER 22-25, 2018. CR18-L01 SAMPLE
LOCATION WAS ADJUSTED BASED ON CONDITIONS PRESENT AT THE TIME OF SAMPLING.
SURFACE V\®TER AND SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTED AT CONTINGENT LOCATIONS WERE
NOT ANALYZED BASED ON THE RISK EVALUATION FRAMEWORK DESCRIBED IN THE WORK
PLAN (REFERENCE 2).
2. PORE WATER COULD NOT BE COLLECTED AT CR16-L04 DUE TO SUBSTRATE CONDITIONS.
3. THE CEDAR RIVER PRIMARY SAMPLE LOCATIONS FROM OCTOBER 22-24, 2016 FOR THE
SHAW AVENUE DUMP SITE ARE ALSO SHOWN ON THIS FIGURE TO PROVIDE CONTEXT.
4. PROPOSED CEDAR RIVER MONITORING LOCATION IS APPROXIMATE AND MAY BE ADJUSTED
BASED ON ACCESS CONSTRAINTS.
REFERENCED)
1. AERIAL FROM ESRIARCGIS ONLINE.
2. WORK PLAN RESPONSE TO THIRD 5-YEAR REVIEW, LABOUNTY LANDFILL SITE, CHARLES
CITY, IOWA, GOLDER ASSOCIATES, AUGUST 2016.
PROJECT
RESPONSE TO FIFTH 5-YEAR REVIEW
LABOUNTY LANDFILL SITE
TITLE
2016 ARSENIC EVALUATION SAMPLE LOCATIONS
CONSULTANT YYYY-MM-OD 2017-1;
lates
FIGURE
2
-------
-------
APPENDIX A
PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG
-------
PROJECT TITLE: LABOUNTY LANDFILL SITE
PHOTO 1
Description: View of
looking upstream at CR16-
L01.
PHOTO 2
Description: View of
Campground across the
Cedar River from CR16-
L02.
\\mtlaurel\mtl data\data\projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\summary reports\Jabounty\final\appendix aMabounty photolog.docx
Golder
Associates
-------
May 2017
165-2829
PHOTO 3
Description: View of
Cedar River and
Campground (across the
River) from CR16-L03.
PHOTO 4
Description: View of
Cedar River and
Campground (across the
River) from CR16-L04.
\\mtlaurel\mtl data\data\projects\2016 projectsM 652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\summary reports\Jabounty\final\appendix aUabounty photolog.docx
, Golder
Associates
-------
3
165-2829
PHOTO 5
Description: View of
Cedar River and
Campground (across the
River) from CR16-L05.
PHOTO 6
Description: View of
Cedar River from CR16-
L06.
\\mtlaurel\mtl data\data\projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\summary reportsVabounty\final\appendix aUabounty photolog.docx
Golder
Associates
-------
May 2017
165-2829
PHOTO 7
Description: View of
Cedar River from CR16-
L07.
PHOTO 8
Description: View of
Cedar River from CR16-
L08.
\\mtlaurel\mtl data\data\projects\2016 projectsW652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\summary reports\labounty\final\appendix a\labounty photolog.docx
Golder
Associates
-------
5
165-2829
PHOTO 10
Description: View of
Cedar River from CR16-
-------
May 2017
6
165-2829
PHOTO 11
Description: View of
Cedar River from CR16-
L11.
\\mtlaurel\mll data\data\projects\2016 projectsM652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\summary reports\labounty\final\appendix aMabounty phololog.docx
Golder
Associates
-------
APPENDIX B
LABORATORY DATA PACKAGE FOR ARSENIC SPECIATION RESULTS
-------
Project ID: GOL-ML1602 (Labounty)
PM: Tiffany Stilwater
Brooks
BAL Report 1644011
Client PM: Samantha Battle
Client PO: 1652829
Sample Results
Sample
Analyte
Report Matrix
Basis
Result
Qualifier
MDL
MRL
Unit
Batch
Sequence
CR16-L01-PW
1644011-04
As(lll)
Water
D
7.11
0.100
1.00
Mg/L
B162793
1601243
1644011-04
As(V)
Water
D
2.51
0.100
1.00
mq/l
B162793
1601243
1644011-04
DMAs
Water
D
<0.150
U
0.150
1.05
mq/l
B162793
1601243
1644011-04
MMAs
Water
D
<0.150
U
0.150
1.15
^g/L
B162793
1601243
CR16-L01-SW
1644011-01
As(lll)
Water
D
3.58
0-.100
1.00
Mg/L
B162793
1601243
1644011-01
As(V)
Water
D
5.74
0.100
1.00
MQ/L
B162793
1601243
1644011-01
DMAs
Water
D
<0.150
u
0.150
1.05
MQ/L
B162793
1601243
1644011-01
MMAs
Water
D
<0.150
u
0.150
1.15
(jg/L
B162793
1601243
CR16-L02-PW
1644011-08
As(lll)
Water
D
8.51
0.100
1.00
i-ig/L
B162750
1601230
1644011-08
As(V)
Water
D
6.53
0.100
1.00
Mg/L
B162750
1601230
1644011-08
DMAs
Water
D
<0.150
u
0.150
1.05
Mg/L
B162750
1601230
1644011-08
MMAs
Water
D
<0.150
u
0.150
1.15
i-jg/L
B162750
1601230
CR16-L02-SW
1644011-07
As(lll)
Water
D
4.45
0.100
1.00
^g/L
B162750
1601230
1644011-07
As(V)
Water
D
7.19
0.100
1.00
ijg/L
B162750
1601230
1644011-07
DMAs
Water
D
<0.150
u
0.150
1.05
^g/L
B162750
1601230
1644011-07
MMAs
Water
D
<0.150
u
0.150
1.15
ijg/L
B162750
1601230
CR16-L05-PW
1644011-10
As(lll)
Water
D
46.1
0.100
1.00
(jg/L
B162750
1601230
1644011-10
As(V)
Water
D
8.76
0.100
1.00
^g/L
B162750
1601230
1644011-10
DMAs
Water
D
<0.150
u
0.150
1.05
^g/L
B162750
1601230
1644011-10
MMAs
Water
D
0.257
S J
0.150
1.15
i-jg/L
B162750
1601230
CR16-L05-SW
1644011-09
As(lll)
Water
D
5.37
0.100
1.00
(jg/L
B162750
1601230
1644011-09
As(V)
Water
D
8.59
0.100
1.00
^g/L
B162750
1601230
1644011-09
DMAs
Water
D
<0.150
u
0.150
1.05
^g/L
B162750
1601230
1644011-09
MMAs
Water
D
<0.150
u
0.150
1.15
Mg/L
B162750
1601230
18804 North Creek Parkway, Suite 100, Bothell, WA 98011 ¦ P(206) 632-6206 ¦ F(206) 632-6017 ¦ info@brooksapplied.com ¦ www.brooksapplied.com
8 of 434
-------
Project ID: GOL-ML1602 (Labounty)
PM: Tiffany Stilwater
Brooks;
BAL Report 1644011
Client PM: Samantha Battle
Client PO: 1652829
Sample Results
'i
Sample
Analyte
Report Matrix
Basis
Result
Qualifier MDL
MRL
Unit
Batch
Sequence
CR16-L06-PW
1644011-12
As(lll)
Water
D
267
0.100
1.00
ijg/L
B162750
1601230
1644011-12
As(V)
Water
D
33.1
0.100
1.00
Mg/L
B162750
1601230
1644011-12
DMAs
Water
D
1.35
0.150
1.05
MQ/L
B162750
1601230
1644011-12
MM As
Water
D
0.630
B J
0.150
1.15
Mg/L
B162750
1601230
CR16-L06-SW
1644011-11
As(lll)
Water
D
1.55
0.100
1.00
mq/l
B162750
1601230
1644011-11
As(V)
Water
D
3.26
0.100
1.00
ijg/L
B162750
1601230
1644011-11
DMAs
Water
D
<0.150
U
0.150
1.05
Mg/L
B162750
1601230
1644011-11
MMAs
Water
D
<0.150
U
0.150
1.15
Mg/L
B162750
1601230
CR16-L08-PW
1644011-18
As(lll)
Water
D
<0.100
U
0.100
1.00
Mg/L
B162750
1601230
1644011-18
As(V)
Water
D
54.8
0.100
1.00
ijg/L
B162750
1601230
1644011-18
DMAs
Water
D
<0.150
U
0.150
1.05
i-ig/L
B162750
1601230
1644011-18
MMAs
Water
D
<0.150
U
0.150
1.15
Mg/L
B162750
1601230
CR16-L08-SW
1644011-17
As(lll)
Water
D
<0,100
U
0.100
1.00
i-jg/L
B162750
1601230
1644011-17
As(V)
Water
D
1.50
0.100
1.00
^g/L
B162750
'1601230
1644011-17
DMAs
Water
D
<0.150
U
0.150
1.05
i-ig/L
B162750
1601230
1644011-17
MMAs
Water
D
<0.150
U
0.150
1.15
Mg/L
B162750
1601230
CR16-L10-PW
1644011-20
As(lll)
Water
D
<0.100
U
0.100
1.00
[jg/L
B162750
1601230
1644011-20
As(V)
Water
D
1.17
0.100
1.00
pg/L
B162750
1601230
1644011-20
DMAs
Water
D
<0.150
U
0.150
1.05
pg/L
B162750
1601230
1644011-20
MMAs
Water
D
S 0.150
U
0.150
1.15
pg/L
B162750
1601230
CR16-L10-SW
1644011-19
As(lll)
Water
D
<0.100
U
0.100
1.00
Mg/L
B162750
1601230
1644011-19
As(V)
Water
D
1.21
0.100
1.00
pg/L
B162750
1601230
1644011-19
DMAs
Water
D
<0.150
u
0.150
1.05
pg/L
B162750
1601230
1644011-19
MMAs
Water
D
<0.150
u
0.150
1.15
pg/L
B162750
1601230
18804 North Creek Parkway, Suite 100, Bothell, WA 98011 ¦ P(206) 632-6206 ¦ F(206) 632-6017 • info@brooksapplied.com ¦ www.brooksapplied.com
9 of 434
-------
Project ID: GOL-ML1602 (Labounty)
PM: Tiffany Stilwater
Brooks
Applied
Labs
BAL Report 1644011
Client PM: Samantha Battle
Client PO: 1652829
Sample Results
Sample Analyte Report Matrix Basis Result Qualifier MDL MRL Unit Batch Sequence
CR16-LDUP-01PW
1644011-14
As( III)
Water
D
7.60
0.100
1.00
pg/L
B162750
1601230
1644011-14
As(V)
Water
D
2.42
0.100 '
1.00
Mg/L
B162750
1601230
1644011-14
DMAs
Water
D
<0.150
U
0.150
1.05
Mg/L
B162750
1601230
1644011-14
MM As
Water
D
<0.150
U
0.150
1.15
i-jg/L
B162750
1601230
CR16-LDUP-01SW
1644011-13
As(lll)
Water
D
4.17
0.100
1.00
ijg/L
B162750
1601230
1644011-13
As(V)
Water
D
6.77
0.100
1.00
ijg/L
B162750
1601230
1644011-13
DMAs
Water
D
<0.150
U
0.150
1.05
mq/l
B162750
1601230
1644011-13
MMAs
Water
D
<0.150
U
0.150
1.15
pg/L
B162750
1601230
18804 North Creek Parkway, Suite 100, Bothell, WA 98011
P(206) 632-6206 ¦ F(206) 632-6017 ¦ info@brooksapplied.com ¦ www.brooksapplied.com
10 of 434
-------
APPENDIX C
VAPOR INTRUSION EVALUATION - SELECT SAFETY DATA SHEETS
-------
ATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET
I. CHEMICAL PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION
CHAMPION® MSDS 4126P
Synonyms: —~
4126P CHAMPION® BRAKE PARTS CLEANER
s
CO
V
o
PS
o
2
Company identification
Champion Brands, L.L.C., 1001 Golden Drive, Clinton, MO 64735
PHONE: 800-821-5693 WEBSITE: www.championbrands.com
c/i
O
GO
CAS Registry Number Not Applicable
Synonyms None
Generic/Chemical Name NA
Product Type LIQUID BRAKE CLEANER CONTAINING CHLORINATED SOLVENTS
Preparation Date March 20, 2007
Transportation Emergency Response
CHEMTREC: (800) 424-9300
Product Information
Product Information and MSDS Requests: (800) 821-5693 and www.championbrands.com
NJ
0\
13
2. COMPOSITION/INFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS
COMPONENTS
CAS NUMBER
AMOUNT
PERCHOLETHYLENE
127-18-4 '
90% - 94% weight
XYLENE
1330-20-7
03% - 07% weight
CARBON DIOXIDE
124-38-9
01% - 05% weight
3. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION
EMERGENCY OVERVIEW: Harmful if Inhaled, swallowed, or absorbed through skin.
POTENTIAL HEALTH EFFECTS
CARCINOGENICITY: Product considered "probably carcinogenic to humans" by 1ARC.
MEDICAL CONDITIONS: Pre-existing eye or skin conditions may be aggravated by over-exposure to this product
TARGET ORGANS: Lungs, kidneys, liver, nervous system.
PRIMARY ENTRY ROUTES: Skin absorption and inhalation.
ACUTE HEALTH EFFECTS
EYE: Will cause inflation upon contact
SKIN: Prolonged contact with skin can cause irritation. Repeated skin contact may cause persistent irritation and
dermatitis.
INHALATiON: Respiratory irritation and dizziness.
INGESTION: Product may cause discomfort, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea.
CHRONIC HEALTH EFFECTS: Overexposure to the ingredients in this product may cause liver abnormalities, and
kidney damage. Perchlorethyiene has been shown to increase the rate of spontaneously occun'ng malignant tumors
in certain laboratory animals.
REV DATE: 3/20/2007
PAGE 1 OF 4
-------
w }Xmf '
4. FIRST AID MEASURES
EYE CONTACT: Immediately flush eyes with plenty of water for 15 minutes. Seek medical attention.
SKIN CONTACT: Wash area with soap and water. Seek medical attention if irritation persists.
INHALATION: Remove to fresh air. If not breathing, give artificial respiration. Seek medical attention. Inhalation
hazard unlikely due to low volatility of product.
INGESTION: DO NOT induce vomiting. Only give CONSCIOUS victim two glasses of water and seek medical
attention. NEVER give UNCONSCIOUS victim anything by mouth.
5. FIRE FIGHTING lMEASURES
FIRE CLASSIFICATION:
OSHA Classification (29 CFR 1910.1200): Not classified by OSHA as flammable or combustible.
NFPA RATINGS: Health: 2 Flammabiity: 0 Reactivity: 0
FLAMMABLE PROPERTIES:
FLASH POINT: NG
EXTINGUISHING MEDIA: Carbon Dioxide (C02), Dry Chemical, Foam.
UNUSUAL FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARDS: Vapors are heavier than air and can collect in low areas.
FIRE FIGHTING INSTRUCTIONS: Containers can build up pressure if exposed to fire. Containers should be cooled
with water spray.
FIRE FIGHTING EQUIPMENT: Self contained breathing apparatus with full face piece operated in positive pressure
mode.
NOTE: Product will not support combustion.
ACCIDENT AIJ RELEASE INFORMATION
SPILL/LEAK PROCEDURES: Notify safety personnel, evacuate all unnecessary personnel and provide adequate
ventilation. If feasible and without risk, dean-up personnel should stop leak. All clean-up personnel should wear
proper personal protective equipment
SMALL SPILL: Clean with inert absorbant and place in recovery drums for disposal.
LARGE SPILL: Dike to prevent further migration of material. DO NOT release into waterways or sewers. Follow
applicable federal and state regulations (20CFR1910.120).
NOTE: Product in aerosoi container, spill hazard unlikely.
Reporting: Report spills to local authorities and/or the U.S. Coast Guard's National Response Center at (800) 424-
8802 as appropriate or required.
7. HANDLING AND STOR AGE
STORAGE REQUIREMENTS: Store in clean, dry locations away from excessive heat Store in areas designated for
the storage of (Level I) aerosols according to NFPA 306 (Manufacturing and Storage of Aerosol Products).
HANDLING PRECAUTIONS: Wash throughly after handling. Do not get into eyes, on skin, or on clothing. Do not
smoke while using this product. Do not use near excessive heat, sparks, or open flame.
8. EXTOSURIi CONTROL/PERSON AL .PROTECTIVE EQU I PM ENT
ENGINEERING CONTROLS: Eye wash station and safety shower.
VENTILATION: Strong general ventilation or local exhaust.
PERSONNEL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
EYE: Chemical splash goggles with indirect or no ventilation.
SKIN: Chemical resistant gloves such as nitrile.
RESPIRATORY: Organic vapor air purifying respirator if vapors are a nuisance or if the concentrations are above
PEL orTLV.
COMMENTS: Never eat, drink, or smoke in work areas.
GO
O
oo
O
§
%
IZ)
o
C/3
i—»
NJ
G\
REV DATE: 3/20/2007
PAGE 2 OF 4
-------
MARVEL OIL CO., INC.
625 WILLOWBROOK CTR PKWY
WILLOWBROOK, IL 60527
SAFETY DATA SHEET
1. Product and Company Identification
1.1 Product Identifier
Product Name: Marvel Air Tool Oil
Product Code (SKU): MM85R1 (50100), MM080R (50093) - See Section 15 for
discontinued SKU's
1.2 Relevant Identified Uses Of The Substance
Product Use: Engine Oil Additive - Fuel additive (EPA Registered)
1.3 Details of the Supplier of the SDS
Company Name: Marvel Oil Company, Inc.
Street Address: 625 Willowbrook Centre Parkway
City, State, Zip Code: Willowbrook, Illinois 60527
1.4 Emergency Telephone Numbers
Phone Number: 1(630)455-3700
Fax Number: 1(630)455-3868
Transportation: 1(800)424-9300 (CHEMTREC)
Medical Assistance: Call your local Poison Control Center
2. Hazard Identification:
2.1 Classification of the Substance or Mixture
Hazard Classification: Flammable liquid 3
Skin irritation 2
Reproductive Toxicity 2
Aspiration toxicity 1
2.2 Label Elements
Pictogram:
Signal Word: Danger
Hazard Statement:
Precautionary Statement:
Flammable liquid and vapor. Causes skin irritation.
Suspected of damaging fertility of the un-born child. May be
fatal if swallowed and enters airways.
Keep away from heat, sparks, open flames or hot surfaces.
Do not smoke. Keep containers tightly closed. Ground ail
containers and receiving equipment. Use explosion proof
electrical, ventilation, and lighting equipment. Use only non-
sparking tools. Take precautionary measures against static
-------
discharge. Wear protective gloves, clothing, eye glasses
and face shield. Do not handle until all safety precautions
have been read and understood. Wash hands thoroughly
after handling. If exposed, get medical attention. If on skin
or hair, remove immediately all contaminated clothing and
launder before re-use. Wash skin with soap and water. If
skin irritation occurs, get medical attention. If swallowed,
immediately call a poison control center or doctor. Do NOT
induce vomiting. Store in a well ventilated place. Dispose
of contents and container in accordance with all local, state,
national and international regulations.
not applicable
CAS Number
64742-52-5
8052-41-3
1330-78-5
95-50-1
105-46-7
Concentration (wt%l
60-100%
10-30%
0.1-1.0%
0.1-1.0%
<0.1%
2.3 Other Hazards
Description of additional HNOC: None
3. Information on Ingredients:
3.1 Substance
3.2 Mixture
Component
Petroleum Distillates (Hydrotreated Heavy
Naphthenic)
Petroleum Distillates (Stoddard Solvent)
Tricresyl Phosphate
Ortho Dichlorobenzene
Para Dichlorobenzene
4. First Aid Measures:
4.1 Description of First Aid Measures
Inhalation: Remove to fresh air and promote deep breathing. Get medical attention if effects
persist or you feel un-well.
Skin: In case of skin contact, wash thoroughly with soap and water. Remove contaminated
clothing and footwear. Launder clothing before re-use. Call a physician if irritation develops or
persists.
Eyes: In case of eye contact, immediately flush eyes with plenty of water. Remove contact
lenses if worn. If irritation persists, get medical attention
Ingestion: If swallowed, do not induce vomiting. Never give anything by mouth to an
unconscious person. Immediately call a poison control center or physician.
4.2 Most important symptoms and effects - acute and chronic
Vapors may cause drowsiness or
Inhalation:
Skin:
Eyes:
Ingestion:
May cause respiratory tract irritation,
dizziness.
Cause skin irritation. Symptoms may include redness, edema, drying,
defatting, and cracking of skin.
May cause temporary eye irritation. Symptoms may include discomfort or
pain, excess blinking and tearing, with redness and swelling.
May be fatal if swallowed and enters airways. This product may be
aspirated into the lungs and cause chemical pneumonitis. May cause
stomach distress, nausea, and vomiting.
-------
4.3 Indication of any immediate medical attention and special treatment
Symptoms may not appear immediately. Seek medical attention if effects develop or persist and
you feel un-well.
5. Fire Fighting Measures:
5.1 Extinguishing media
Carbon dioxide, dry chemical, and alcohol foam
5.2 Special hazards arising from the substance or mixture
C02, CO, and hydrocarbons
5.3 Advice for Fire Fighters
Keep up wind of fire. Wear full firefighting turn out gear (full bunker gear) and respiratory
protection (SCBA). Cool closed containers exposed to fire with water. See Section 8 for
personal protection.
6. Accidental Release Measures:
6.1 Personal precautions, protective equipment, and emergency procedures
Use personal protection recommended in Section 8. Isolate the hazard area and deny entry to
unnecessary and unprotected personnel. Eliminate all source of ignition.
6.2 Methods and materials for containment and clean up
For containment: Contain and absorb spill with inert material. Place in suitable container for
disposal. Do not flush to sewer or allow to enter waterways. See section 8 for PPE.
For clean up: Take up material and place in a suitable container. Vapors may be heavier than \
air and may travel along the ground to a distant source of ignition. Provide adequate ventilation.
7. Handling and Storage
7.1 Precautions for safe handling
Keep away from source of ignition. Do not smoke. Take precaution to eliminate static discharge.
Avoid contact with skin and eyes. Avoid breathing vapor or mist. Do not swallow. Do not eat or
drink while handling. Wash hands with soap and water after handling. Use only non-sparking
tools.
7.2 Conditions for safe storage including incompatibilities
Keep out of reach of children. Store in a well ventilated place. Do not store above 49°C (120°F).
7.3 Specific end uses
Shelf Life: Shelf life is considered to be 7 -10 years when properly stored.
8. Exposure Control/Personal Protection:
8.1 Control parameters
-------
Exposure Limits 8 hr TWA: (OSHA PEL)
Petroleum Distillates (Hydrotreated Heavy not applicable
Naphthenic)
Petroleum Distillates (Stoddard Solvent) 500 ppm
Tricresyl Phosphate not applicable
Ortho Dichlorobenzene 50 ppm
Para Dichlorobenzene 75 ppm
8.2 Exposure controls
(ACGIHTWA)
not applicable
100 ppm
not applicable
25 ppm
10 ppm
Use adequate ventilation to keep exposure below recommended limits. Ensure that eye wash
station and safety shower are close to work station.
Hand Protection Equipment: Wear chemical resistant gioves to prevent skin contact.
Eye Protection Equipment: Wear safety glasses or splash goggles to prevent eye contact.
Skin and Body Protection: Wear suitable protective clothing.
Respiration/Ventilation Protection Requirements: Provide good ventilation,
ingestion Protection Requirements: Do not eat, drink or smoke while handling. Wash hands
with soap and water after handling. Launder all clothing and foot wear before re-use.
9. Physical And Chemical Properties:
9.1 Information of basic chemical and physical properties
Physical Form:
Color:
Odor:
Odor Threshold:
pH:
Melting Point/Freeze Point-
Initial Boiling Point:
Flash Point (Seta Closed Cup):
thin liquid
clear red
typical oily
not available
not applicable - oil based product
-51 °C (-60°F)
not available
53°C (128°F)
Flammabiiity Limits:
Evaporation Rate:
Flammabiiity Solid/Gas:
Vapor Pressure:
Vapor Density:
Specific Gravity:
Solubility in Water:
Auto Ignition Temperature:
Partition coefficient (n/octonol/water)
Viscosity (Klnlmatic @ 100°C):
Explosive Limits: Upper: not available Lower: not available
not available
not applicable
not available
not available
0.876
insoluble
not available
not available
2.0 - 3.0 cSt
9. 2 Other Information
% NVM by Weight: 75.0%
% VOC Content (California): 24.92%
10. Stability and Reactivity:
10.1 Reactivity
Does not react under normal conditions
10.2 Chemical stability
Stable
-------
10.3 Possibility of hazardous reactions
Does not react under normal conditions
10.4 Conditions to avoid
Heat and incompatible materials
10.6 Incompatible materials
Strong oxidizers such as bleach and peroxides
10.6 Hazardous decomposition products
C02, CO and hydrocarbons
11. Toxicoloaical Information:
11.1 Information on Toxicological effects
Marvel Mvsterv Oil
LD50 - Oral Rat >2000 mg/Kg
LD50 - Dermal Rabbit >2000 mg/Kg
LC50 - Inhalation Rat >20 mg/L (4 hr)
Petroleum Distillates Hvdrotreated Heaw Naphthenic (64742-52-5)
LD50 - Oral Rat >5000 mg/Kg
LD50 - Dermal Rabbit >5000 mg/Kg
LC50 - Inhalation Rat >5 mg/L (4 hr)
Tricresvl Phosphate (1330-78-5)
LD50 - Oral Rat 3000 mg/Kg
o-Dichlorobenzene (95-50-1)
LD50 - Oral Rat 500 mg/Kg
LD50 - Dermal Rabbit >10000 mg/Kg
LC50 - Inhalation Rat 8.15 mg/L (4 hr)
p-Dichlorobenzene (106-46-7)
LD50 - Oral Rat >2000 mg/Kg
LD50 - Dermal Rabbit >2000 mg/Kg
Skin corrosion/irritation Causes skin irritation
Serious eye damage/irritation Based on available data, classification data are not met
Respiratory or skin sensitization Based on available data, classification data are not met
Germ cell mutagenicity Based on available data, classification data are not met
Carcinogenicity Based on available data, classification data are not met
o-Dichlorobenzene (95-50-1) IARC Group 3 - Not Classified
p-dichlorobenzene (106-46-7) IARC Group 2B - Possible carcinogen to humans.
NTP 1-Evidence of Carcinogenicity 3, Reasonably
anticipated to be a human Carcinogen
Reproductive toxicity Suspected of damaging fertility of un-born child
Specific target organs - single exposure
Based on available data, classification data are not met
Specific target organs - repeated exposure
Based on available data, classification data are not met
-------
Aspiration hazard May be fatal if swallowed and enters air ways.
Symptoms/injuries after inhalation May cause respiratory tract irritation. Vapors may cause
drowsiness and dizziness.
Symptoms/injuries after skin contact Cause skin irritation. Symptoms may include redness,
edema, drying, defatting, and cracking of skin.
Symptoms/injuries after eye contact May cause temporary eye irritation. Symptoms may include
discomfort or pain, excess blinking and tearing, with redness
and swelling.
Symptoms/injuries after ingestion May be fatal if swallowed and enters airways. This product
may be aspirated into the lungs and cause chemical
pneumonitis. May cause stomach distress, nausea, and
vomiting.
12. Ecological Information:
12.1 Toxicity
Not recommended for release into aquatic systems without treatment
12.2 Persistence and degradability
Not established
12.3 Bioaccumulative potential
Not established
12.4 Mobility in soil
Not established
12.5 Other adverse effects
None known
\
13. Disposal Considerations:
13.1 Waste treatment methods
RCRA Hazardous Waste: ' Regulated as a hazardous waste (D-001 Ignitable).
Waste Disposal Method: Dispose of in accordance with local, state and federal
regulations
Waste Disposal Vessel: Metal drums are recommended.
14. Transportation information:
14.1 UN number
1268
14.2 UN Proper shipping name
Petroleum Distillate n.o.s.
14.3 Transport Hazard class
3
14.4 Packaging group
III
14.5 Marine Pollutant
No
14.6 Transportation in Bulk
Not applicable
-------
14.7 Special precautions
Use limited quantities
15. Regulatory Information:
15.1 US Federal Regulations
TSCA Status: All ingredients are commercially available and listed by the manufacturer under
TSCA.
15.2 Foreign Regulations
Canadian Status: All materials contained in this product are listed on the Canadian Domestic
Substance List (DSL). Consult Turtle Wax, inc. regarding status of ingredients.
European Union: All materials contained in this product are listed on EiNECS.
AICS: All materials are registered for AiCS (Australia)
15.3 State Regulations
State Regulatory Informatlon:
The following chemicals are specifically listed by individual states; other product specific health
and safety data in other sections of the SDS may also be applicable for state requirements. For
details on your regulatory requirements, contact the appropriate agency in your state.
California Prop 65:
CAS Number Concentration State Code
p-Dichlorobenzene (106-46-7) <0.1% Cancer
15.4 HIMS & NFPA Classifications
HIMS Classification:
Health
2
Flammability
2
Reactivity
0
NFPA Classification:
Health
2
Flammability
2
Reactivity
0
15.5 Discontinued SKU's
All discontinued SKU's used this same formula.
MM080, MM085, MM85R, MM086, MM088R, MM089
I
16. Other Information:
Reason For Issue Conversion to OSHA GHS SDS Format
Prepared By James Heidel
Preparer's Title Technical Director, R&D
SDS Administrator Jean Mayszak - Technical Compliance Manager, R&D
-------
Approval Date
Supersedes Date
Revision Number
This information is, to the best of Turtle Wax, lnc.'s knowledge and belief, accurate and reliable.
However, no representation, warranty, or guarantee is made to its accuracy, reliability or completeness.
It is the user's responsibility to satisfy oneself as to the suitableness and completeness of such
information for their own particular use.
March 10, 2015
December 27, 2012
#11
-------
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET
AMOCO REGULAR LEAD-FREE GASOLINE
iV Y
MSDS No. 03992000
ENGLISH
1.0 CHEMICAL PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION
PRODUCT NAME: AMOCO REGULAR LEAD-FREE GASOLINE
MANUFACTURER/SUPPLIER: EMERGENCY HEALTH INFORMATION:
Amoco Oil Company 1 (800) 447-8735
200 East Randolph Drive EMERGENCY SPILL INFORMATION:
Chicago, Illinois 60601 U.S.A. 1 (800) 424-9300 CHEMTREC (USA)
OTHER PRODUCT SAFETY INFORMATION:
(312) 856-3907
2.0 COMPOSITION/INFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS
Component CAS# Range % by Wt.
Gasoline 8006-61-9 85-100
Benzene 71-43-2 1-4
Butane 106-97-8 1-12
Cyclohexane 110-82-7 1-5
Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 1-2
Heptane 142-82-5 1-2
Hexane 110-54-3 1-5
Pentane 109-66-0 1-10
Toluene 108-88-3 1-22
Trimethylbenzene 25551-13-7 1-5
Xylene 1330-20-7 1-10
Methyl tertiary butyl ether 1634-04-4 0-15
(MTBE)
(See Section 8.0, "Exposure Controls/Personal Protection", for exposure guidelines)
Issued: January 19, 1995
-------
AMOCO REGULAR LEAD-FREE GASOLINE
MSDS No. 03992000
Page 2 of 8
3.0 HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION
EMERGENCY OVERVIEW: Danger! Extremely flammable. High vapor concentrations can cause headaches,
dizziness, drowsiness and nausea. Harmful if swallowed and/or aspirated into lungs. Can produce skin irri-
tation on prolonged or repeated contact. Use as motor fuel only. Long-term exposure to vapors has caused
cancer in laboratory animals.
POTENTIAL HEALTH EFFECTS:
EYE CONTACT: High concentrations of vapor/mist may cause eye discomfort.
SKIN CONTACT: Prolonged or repeated contact can defat the skin and lead to irritation and/or dermatitis.
INHALATION: Can be harmful if high concentrations are inhaled. High vapoivconcentrations can cause
headaches, dizziness, drowsiness, and nausea, and may lead to unconsciousness. See "Toxicological
Information" section {Section 11.0).
INGESTION: Harmful or fatal if liquid is aspirated into lungs.
HMIS CODE: (Health:1) {Flammabllity:3) (Reactivity:0) CHRONIC HEALTH HAZARD
NFPA CODE: (Health:1) {Flammability:3) (Reactiyity:0) CHRONIC HEALTH HAZARD.
4.0 FIRST AID MEASURES
EYE: Flush eyes with plenty of water. Get medical attention if irritation persists.
SKIN: Wash exposed skin with soap and water. Remove contaminated clothing, including shoes, and thor-
oughly clean and dry before reuse. Get medical attention if irritation develops.
INHALATION: If adverse effects occur, remove to uncontaminated area. Give artificial respiration if not
breathing. Get medical attention.
INGESTION: If swallowed, do NOT induce vomiting. Get immediate medical attention.
Issued: January 19,1995
-------
AMOCO REGULAR LEAD-FREE GASOLINE
MSDS No. 03992000
Page 3 of 8
-4T", v
I -J-. r-
5.0 FIRE FIGHTING MEASURES
FLASHPOINT: -45.0°F
UEL: 7.6%
LEL: 1.3%
AUTOIGNITION TEMPERATURE: 495.0°F
FLAMMABILITY CLASSIFICATION: Extremely Flammable Liquid.
EXTINGUISHING MEDIA: Agents approved Tor Class B hazards (e.g., dry chemical, carbon dioxide, foam,
steam) or water fog.
UNUSUAL FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARDS: Extremely flammable vapor/air mixtures form. Extinguishment of
fire before source of vapor is shut off can create an explosive mixture in air.
FIRE-FIGHTING EQUIPMENT: Firefighters should wear full bunker gear, including a positive pressure self-
contained breathing apparatus.
PRECAUTIONS: Keep away from ignition sources (e.g., heat, sparks and open flames). Keep container closed.
Use with adequate ventilation.
HAZARDOUS COMBUSTION PRODUCTS: Burning can produce carbon monoxide and/or carbon dioxide and
other harmful products.
6.0 ACCIDENTAL RELEASE MEASURES
Remove or shut off all sources of ignition. Wear respirator and spray with water to disperse vapors. Increase
ventilation if possible. Remove mechanically or contain on an absorbent material such as dry sand or earth.
Keep out of sewers and waterways.
7.0 HANDLING AND STORAGE
HANDLING: Use with adequate ventilation. Ground and bond containers when transferring materials. Wash
thoroughly after handling.
STORAGE: Store in flammable liquids storage area. Keep container closed. Store away from heat, ignition
sources, and open flame in accordance with applicable regulations.
SPECIAL PRECAUTIONS: Keep out of sewers and waterways. Avoid strong oxidizers. Report spills to appro-
priate authorities. USE AS MOTOR FUEL ONLY.
Issued: January 19,199S
-------
AJWOCO REGULAR LEAD-FREE GASOLINE
MSDS No. 03992000
Page 4 of 8
8.0 EXPOSURE CONTROLS I PERSONAL PROTECTION
EYE: None required; however, use of eye protection is good industrial practice.
SKIN: Avoid prolonged or repeated skin contact. Wear protective clothing and gloves if prolonged or
repeated contact ts likely.
INHALATION: Use with adequate ventilation. Avoid breathing vapor and/or mist. If ventilation is inadequate,
use NIOSH/MSHA certified respirator that will protect against organic vapor and dust/mist.
ENGINEERING CONTROLS: Control airborne concentrations below the exposure guidelines.
EXPOSURE GUIDELINES:
Component
Gasoline
Benzene
Butane
Cyclohexane
Ethylbenzene
Heptane
Hexane
Pentane
Toluene
CAS#
8006-61-9
71-43-2
106-97-8
110-82-7
100-41-4
142-82-5
110-54-3
109-66-0
108-88-3
Exposure Limits
OSHA PEL: 300 ppm (1989); Not established. (1971)
OSHA STEL: 500 ppm (1989); Not established.
(1971)
ACGIH TLV-TWA: 300 ppm
ACGIH TLV-STEL: 500 ppm
OSHA PEL: 1 ppm
OSHA STEL: 5 ppm
ACGIH TLV-TWA: 10 ppm
OSHA PEL: 800 ppm (1989); Not established. (1971)
ACGIH TLV-TWA: 800 ppm
OSHA PEL: 300 ppm (1989)(1971)
ACGIH TLV-TWA: 300 ppm
OSHA PEL: 100 ppm (1989)(1971)
OSHA STEL: 125 ppm(1989); Not established.
(1971)
ACGIH TLV-TWA: 100 ppm
ACGIH TLV-STEL: 125 ppm
OSHA PEL: 400 ppm (1989); 500 ppm (1971)
OSHA STEL: 500 ppm (1989); Not established.
(1971)
ACGIH TLV-TWA: 400 ppm
ACGIH TLV-STEL: 500 ppm
OSHA PEL: 50 ppm (1989); 500 ppm (1971)
ACGIH TLV-TWA: 50 ppm
OSHA PEL: 000 ppm (1989); 1000 ppm (1971)
OSHA STEL: 750 ppm (1989); Not established.
(1971)
ACGIH TLV-TWA: 600 ppm
ACGIH TLV-STEL: 750 ppm
OSHA PEL 100 ppm (1989); 200 ppm (1971)
OSHA STEL: 150 ppm (1989); Not established.
(1971)
OSHA Ceiling: 300 ppm (1971)
ACGIH TLV-TWA: 50 ppm (skin)
Issued: January 19, 1995
-------
AMOCO REGULAR LEAD-FREE GASOLINE
MSDS No. 03992000.
Page 5 of 8
PRE-
EXPOSURE GUIDELINES:
Trimethylbenzene
Xylene
Methyl tertiary butyl ether
{MTBE)
25551-13-7 OSHA PEL 25 ppm (1989); Not established. (1971)
ACGIH TLV-TWA: 25 ppm
1330-20-7 OSHA PEL: 100 ppm (1989)(1971)
OSHA STEL: 150 ppm (1989); Not established.
(1971)
ACGIH TLV-TWA: 100 ppm
ACGIH TLV-STEL: 150 ppm
1634-04-4 ACGIH TLV-TWA: 40 ppm
9.0 CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
APPEARANCE AND ODOR
pH
VAPOR PRESSURE
VAPOR DENSITY
BOILING POINT
MELTING POINT
SOLUBILITY IN WATER
SPECIFIC GRAVITY (WATER = 1)
Clear. Liquid. Hydrocarbon odor.
Not determined.
7-15 lb RVP (ASTM D-323)
3.0 to 4.0
80.0°F to 430.0°F, Range
Not determined.
Negligible, below 0.1%.
0.75
10.0 STABILITY AND REACTIVITY
STABILITY: Burning can be started easily.
CONDITIONS TO AVOID*. Keep away from ignition sources (e.g. heat, sparks, and open flames).
MATERIALS TO AVOID: Avoid chlorine, fluorine, and other strong oxidizers.
HAZARDOUS DECOMPOSITION: None identified.
HAZARDOUS POLYMERIZATION: Will not occur.
11.0 TOXICOLOGICAL INFORMATION
ACUTE TOXICITY DATA:
EYE IRRITATION; Primary eye irritation score 0.0/110.0 (rabbits).
SKIN IRRITATION: Primary dermal irritation score 1.1/8.0 (rabbits). Acute dermal LD50 greater than
5ml/kg (rabbits). Practically nontoxic for acute exposures by this route.
DERMAL LD50: Testing not conducted. See Other Toxicity Data.
ORAL LD50: Acute oral LD50 18.8ml/kg (rats). Practically nontoxic for acute exposures by this route.
INHALATION LC50: Acute LC50 20.7mg/l (rats).
Issued: January 19,1995
-------
AMOCO REGULAR LEAD-FREE GASOLINE
MSDS No. 03992000
Page 6 of 8
OTHER TOXICITY DATA:
Excessive exposure to vapors may produce headaches, dizziness, nausea, drowsiness, irritation of eyes,
nose and throat and central nervous system depression.
In a long-term inhalation study of whole unleaded gasoline vapors, exposurerelatecj kidney damage and
kidney tumors were observed in male rats. Similar kidney effects were not seen in female rats or in mice.
At the highest exposure level (2056 ppm), female mice had an increased incidence of liver tumors. Results
from subsequent scientific studies suggest that the kidney damage and probably the kidney tumor
response are unique to the male rat. The significance of the mouse liver tumor response in terms of
human health is questionable.
Inhalation of whole unleaded gasoline vapors did not produce birth defects in laboratory animals.
Gasoline is a complex mixture of hydrocarbons and contains benzene (up to 4 volume %), toluene and
xylene. Chronic exposure to high levels of benzene has been shown to cause cancer (leukemia) in
humans and other adverse blood effects (anemia). Benzene is considered a human carcinogen by IARC,
NTP and OSHA. Overexposure to xylene and toluene can cause irritation to the upper respiratory tract,
headache and narcosis. Some liver damage and lung inflammation were seen in chronic studies on
xylene in guinea pigs but not in rats.
Aspiration of this product into the lungs can cause chemical pneumonia and can be fatal. Aspiration into
the lungs can occur while vomiting after ingestion of this product.
12.0 ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION
Ecological testing has not been conducted on this product.
13.0 DISPOSAL INFORMATION
Residues and spilled material are hazardous waste due to ignitability. Disposal must be in accordance with
applicable federal, state, or local regulations. Enclosed-controlled incineration is recommended unless
directed otherwise by applicable ordinances.
Issued: January 19,1995
-------
Page 7 of 8
AMOCO REGULAR LEAD-FREE GASOLINE
MSDS No. 03992000,.
; _ '1
14.0 TRANSPORTATION INFORMATION
U.S. DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
Shipping Name
Hazard Class
Identification Number
Packing Group
Gasoline
3
UN1203
INTERNATIONAL INFORMATION:
Sea (IMO/IMDG)
Shipping Name Not determined.
Air (lC AO/I ATA)
Shipping Name Not determined.
European Road/Rail (ADR/RID)
Shipping Name Not determined.
Canadian Transportation of Dangerous Goods
Shipping Name Not determined.
15.0 REGULATORY INFORMATION
CERCLA SECTIONS 102A/103 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES (40 CFR PART 302.4); This product is exempt from
the CERCLA reporting requirements under 40 CFR Part 302.4. However, if spilled into waters of the United
States, it may be reportable under 33 CFR Part 153 If it produces a sheen.
SARA TITLE III SECTION 302 EXTREMELY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES (40 CFR PART 3S5): This product is not
regulated under Section 302 of SARA and 40 CFR Part 355.
SARA TITLE HI SECTIONS 311/312 HAZARDOUS CATEGORIZATION (40 CFR PART 370): This product is
defined as hazardous by OSHA under 29 CFR Part 1910.1200(d).
SARA TITLE 111 SECTION 313 (40 CFR PART 372): This product contains the following substance(s), which is on
the Toxic Chemicals List in 40 CFR Part 372:
Component/CAS Number
Weight Percent
Benzene 71-43-2
4
Cyclohexane 110-82-7
5
Ethylbenzene 100-41-4
2
Xylene 1330-20-7
1°
Methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) 1634-04-4
15
Hexane 110-54-3
5
Toluene 108-88-3
22
U.S. INVENTORY (TSCA): Listed on inventory.
OSHA HAZARD COMMUNICATION STANDARD: Flammable liquid. Irritant. Contains components listed by
ACGIH. Contains components listed by OSHA. Contains a carcinogenic component.
issued: January 19,1995
-------
AMOCO REGULAR LEAD-FREE GASOLINE
MSDS No. 03992000
Page 8 of 8
EC INVENTORY (EINECS^ELINCS): Not determined.
JAPAN INVENTORY (MITI): Not determined.
AUSTRALIA INVENTORY (AICS): Not determined.
KOREA INVENTORY (ECL): Not determined. \
CANADA INVENTORY (DSL): Not determined.
PHILIPPINE INVENTORY (PICCS): Not determined.
16.0
OTHER INFORMATION
Prepared by:
Environment, Health and Safety Department
Issued: January 19, 1995
Supersedes: September 24, 1993
This material Safety Data Sheet conforms to the requirements of ANSI Z4Q0.1.
This material safety data sheet and the information it contains is offered to you in good faith as accurate. We
have reviewed any information contained in this data sheet which we received from sources outside our
company. We believe that information to be correct but cannot guarantee its accuracy or completeness. Health
and safety precautions in this data sheet may not be adequate for all individuals and/or situations. It Is the
user's obligation to evaluate and use this product safely and to comply with all applicable laws and regulations.
No statement made in this data sheet shall be construed as a permission or recommendation for the use of any
product in a manner that might infringe existing patents. No warranty is made, either express or Implied.
Issued: January 19.1995
-------
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET
j-'r
AMOCO PREMIER DIESEL FUEL \ L
Covers all Premier Diesel Fuel brands.
MSDS No.
ENGLISH
1115S000
1.0 CHEMICAL PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION
PRODUCT NAME: AMOCO PREMIER DIESEL FUEL
MANUFACTURER/SUPPLIER:
Amoco Oil Company
200 East Randolph Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60601 U.S.A.
EMERGENCY HEALTH INFORMATION:
1 (800) 447-8735
EMERGENCY SPILL INFORMATION:
1 (800) 424-9300 CHEMTREC (USA)
OTHER PRODUCT SAFETY INFORMATION:
(312) 856-3907
2.0 COMPOSITION/INFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS
Component CAS# Range % by Wt,
Petroleum distillate 68334*30-5 95-100
Naphthalene 91-20-3 0-1
Xylene 1330-20-7 0-1
(See Section 8,0. "Exposure Controls/Personal Protection", for exposure guidelines)
3.0 HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION
EMERGENCY OVERVIEW: Warning! Combustible. Harmful or fatal if liquid is aspirated into lungs. Causes
skin irritation on prolonged or repeated contact.
POTENTIAL HEALTH EFFECTS:
EYE CONTACT: No significant health hazards identified.
SKIN CONTACT: Causes skin irritation on prolonged or repeated contact. See "Toxicological Information"
section (Section 11.0).
INHALATION*. No significant health hazards identified for the liquid fuel. See "Toxicological Information"
section (Section 11.0).
INGESTION: Harmful or fatal if liquid is aspirated into lungs. See "Toxicological Information" section
(Section 11.0).
| HMIS CODE: (Heaith:2) (Flammablllty:2) (Reactivity:0).
| NFPA CODE: (Health:2) (Flammability:2) (Reactivity:0)
Issued: January 05, 1995
-------
AMOCO PREMIER DIESEL FUEL
MSDS No. 11156000
Page 2 of 6
4.0 FIRST AID MEASURES
EYE: Flush eyes with plenty of water.
SKIN: Wash exposed skin with soap and water. Remove contaminated clothing, including shoes, and thor-
oughly clean and dry before reuse.
INHALATION: If adverse effects occur, remove to uncontaminated area.
INGESTION: If swallowed, do NOT induce vomiting. Get immediate medical attention.-
5.0 FIRE FIGHTING MEASURES
FLASHPOINT: 120-180°F (Tag closed cup)
UEL: 7.5%
LEL: 0.6%
AUTOIGNITION TEMPERATURE: Not determined.
FLAMMABILITY CLASSIFICATION: Combustible Liquid
EXTINGUISHING MEDIA: Agents approved for Class B hazards (e.g., dry chemical, carbon dioxide, foam,
steam) or water fog.
UNUSUAL FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARDS: Combustible liquid.
FIRE-FIGHTING EQUIPMENT: Firefighters should wear full bunker gear, including a positive pressure self-
contained breathing apparatus.
PRECAUTIONS: Keep away from sources of ignition (e.g., heat and open flames). Use with adequate venti-
lation.
HAZARDOUS COMBUSTION PRODUCTS: Incomplete burning can produce carbon monoxide and/or carbon
dioxide and other harmful products.
6.0 ACCIDENTAL RELEASE MEASURES
Remove or shut off all sources of ignition. Prevent spreading by diking, ditching, or absorbing on inert mate-
rials. Keep out of sewers and waterways.
7.0 HANDLING AND STORAGE
HANDLING: Use with adequate ventilation. Keep away from ignition sources (e.g., heat, sparks, or open
flames). Ground and bond containers when transferring materials. Wash thoroughly after handling.
STORAGE: Store in combustible liquids storage area. Store away from heat, ignition sources, and open
flame in accordance with applicable regulations.
Issued: January 05, 1995
-------
AMOCO PREMIER DIESEL FUEL
MSDS No. 11156000
Page 3 of 6
V v h-
/"IV 'v ~
" .--£1 . .j.
8.0 EXPOSURE CONTROLS / PERSONAL PROTECTION
EYE: None required; however, use of eye protection is good industrial practice.
SKIN: Avoid prolonged or repeated skin contact. Wear protective gloves if prolonged or repeated contact is
likely.
INHALATION: Use with adequate ventilation.
ENGINEERING CONTROLS: Control airborne concentrations below the exposure guidelines.
EXPOSURE GUIDELINES:
Component
Petroleum distillate
Naphthalene
Xylene
CAS# Exposure Limits
68334-30-5 No exposure limit established
91-20-3 OSHA PEL: 10 ppm (1989)(1971)
OSHA STEL: 15 ppm (1989); Not established. (1971)
ACGIH TLV-TWA: 10 ppm
ACGIH TLV-STEL: 15 ppm
1330-20-7 OSHA PEL: 100 ppm (1989)(1971)
OSHA STEL: 150 ppm (1989); Not established.
(1971)
ACGIH TLV-TWA: 100 ppm
ACGIH TLV-STEL: 150 ppm
9.0 CHEMICAL AND
APPEARANCE AND ODOR:
pH:
VAPOR PRESSURE:
VAPOR DENSITY:
BOILING POINT:
MELTING POINT:
SOLUBILITY IN WATER:
SPECIFIC GRAVITY (WATER = 1):
VISCOSITY:
1YSICAL PROPERTIES
Liquid. Clear or red. Petroleum odor.
Not determined.
Not determined.
Not determined.
340-875°F (approximate range)
Not determined.
Negligible, below 0.1%.
0.85 to 0:88
1.8-3.6cSt at 100°F
Issued: January 05, 1995
-------
AMOCO PREMIER DIESEL FUEL
M&DS No. 11156000
Page 4 of 6
10.0 STABILITY AND REACTIVITY
STABILITY: Sfable.
CONDITIONS TO AVOID: Keep away from ignition sources (e.g. heat, sparks, and open flames).
MATERIALS TO AVOID: Avoid chlorine, fluorine, and other strong oxidizers.
HAZARDOUS DECOMPOSITION: None identified.
HAZARDOUS POLYMERIZATION: Will not occur.
11.0 TOXICOLOGICAL INFORMATION
ACUTE TOXICITY DATA:
EYE IRRITATION: Similar products have produced maximum eye irritation scores ranging from 0.33 to
1.0/110.0; 24 hours (rabbits).
lj
SKIN IRRITATION: Similar products have produced primary skin irritation scores ranging from 0.67 to
3.83/8.0 (rabbits). Dermal LD50 for similar products was greater than 2g/kg; practically non-toxic for
acute exposures by this route.
DERMAL LD50: Testing not conducted. See Other Toxicity Data.
ORAL LD50: For a similar product oral LD50 was greater than 5g/kg; practically non-toxic for acute expo-
sures by this route.
INHALATION LC50: Testing not conducted. See Other Toxicity Data.
OTHER TOXICITY DATA:
Middle distillate: From skin-painting studies of petroleum distillates of similar composition and distillate
range, it has been shown that these types of materials often possess weak carcinogenic activity in labora-
tory animals. In these tests, the material is painted on the shaved backs of mice twice a weqk for their
lifetime. The material is not washed off between applications. Therefore, there may be a potential risk of
skin cancer from prolonged or repeated skin contact with this product in the absence of good personal
hygiene. This particular product has not been tested for carcinogenic activity, but we have chosen to be
cautious in light of the findings with other distillate streams.
Occasional skin contact with this product is not expected to have serious effects, but good personal
hygiene should be practiced and repeated skin contact avoided. This product can also be expected to
produce skin irritation upon prolonged or repeated skin contact. Personal hygiene measures taken to
prevent skin irritation are expected to be adequate to prevent risk of skin cancer.
Materials of this type have been shown to produce kidney damage in male rats following prolonged
inhalation exposures. Following extensive research, this effect appears to be unique to the male rat and is
considered to be of little or no relevance in terms of human health risk.
This product has a sufficiently low vapor pressure to prevent a hazardous buildup of vapors unless the
product is heated, used in a confined space with inadequate ventilation or misted. Inhalation of mist or
high concentrations of vapors can produce dizziness, headache, and nausea and possibly irritation of the
eye, nose and throat.
Aspiration of this product into the lungs can cause chemical pneumonia and can be fatal. Aspiration Into
the lungs can occur while vomiting after ingestion of this product. Do not siphon by mouth.
NIOSH has recommended that whole diesel exhaust be regarded as a potential occupational carcinogen,
based on findings of carcinogenic responses in laboratory animals exposed to whole diesel exhaust. The
excess cancer risk for workers exposed to diesel exhaust has not been calculated; however, exposure
should be minimized to reduce potential risk.
issued: January 05, 1995
-------
Page 5 of 6
AMOCO PREMIER DIESEL FUEL
MSDS No. 11156000
No component of this product present at levels greater than 0.1% is identified as a carcinogen by the U.S.
National Toxicology Program, the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Act, or the International Agency on
Research on Cancer (IARC).
12.0 ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION
Ecological testing has not been conducted on this product.
13.0 DISPOSAL INFORMATION
Disposal must be in accordance with applicable federal, state, or local regulations. Enclosed-controlled
incineration is recommended unless directed otherwise by applicable ordinances.
The container for this product can present explosion or fire hazards, even when emptied! To avoid risk of
injury, do not cut, puncture, or weld on or near this container. Since the emptied containers retain product
residue, follow label warnings even after container is emptied.
14.0 TRANSPORTATION INFORMATION
U.S. DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
Shipping Name
Hazard Class
Identification Number
Packing Group
INTERNATIONAL INFORMATION:
Diesel Fuel
Combustible liquid.
NA1993
III
Sea (IMO/IMDG)
Shipping Name Not determined.
Air (ICAO/IATA)
Shipping Name Not determined.
European Road/Rail (ADR/RIO)
Shipping Name Not determined.
Canadian Transportation of Dangerous Goods
Shipping Name Not determined.
Issued: January 05, 1995
-------
AMOCO PREMIER DIESEL FUEL
faSDS No. 11156000
Page 6 of 6
15.0 REGULATORY INFORMATION
CERCLA SECTIONS 102A/103 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES (40 CFR PART 302.4): This product is exempt from
the CERCLA reporting requirements under 40 CFR Part 302.4. However, if spilled into waters of the United
States, it may be reportable under 33 CFR Part 153 if it produces a sheen.
SARA TITLE III SECTION 302 EXTREMELY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES (40 CFR PART 355): This product is not
regulated under Section 302 of SARA and 40 CFR Part 355.
SARA TITLE III SECTIONS 311/312 HAZARDOUS CATEGORIZATION (40 CFR PART 370): This product is
defined as hazardous by OSHA under 29 CFR Part 1910.1200(d).
SARA TITLE III SECTION 313 (40 CFR PART 372): This product contains the following substance(s), which is on
the Toxic Chemicals List in 40 CFR Part 372:
Component/CAS Number
Weight Percent
Xylene 1330-20-7
1
Naphthalene 91-20-3
1
U.S. INVENTORY (TSCA): Listed on Inventory.
OSHA HAZARD COMMUNICATION STANDARD: Combustible liquid. Irritant.
EC INVENTORY (EINECS/ELINCS): Not determined.
JAPAN INVENTORY (MITI): Not determined.
AUSTRALIA INVENTORY (AICS): Not determined.
KOREA INVENTORY (ECL): Not determined.
CANADA INVENTORY (DSL): Not determined.
PHILIPPINE INVENTORY (PICCS): Not determined.
16.0 OTHER INFORMATION
Prepared by:
| Environment, Health and Safety Department Issued: January 05, 1995
| Supersedes: April 08, 1994
I '
This material Safety Data Sheet.conforms to the requirements of ANSI Z400.1.
This material safety data sheet and the information it contains Is offered to you in good faith as accurate. We
have reviewed any information contained in this data sheet which we received from sources outside our
company. We believe that information to be correct but cannot guarantee its accuracy or completeness. Health
and safety precautions in this data sheet may not be adequate for all individuals and/or situations. It is the
user's obligation to evaluate and use this product safely and to comply with all applicable laws and regulations.
No statement made in this data sheet shall be construed as a permission or recommendation for the use of any
product in a manner that might infringe existing patents. No warranty is made, either express or implied.
Issued: January 05,1995
-------
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET
AMOCO SILVER® LEAD-FREE GASOLINE
\ j t_/\ _•
MSDS No. 03258000
ENGLISH
1.0 CHEMICAL PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION
PRODUCT NAME: AMOCO SILVER® LEAD-FREE GASOLINE
MANUFACTURER/SUPPLIER: EMERGENCY HEALTH INFORMATION:
Amoco Oil Company 1 (800) 447-8735
200 East Randolph Drive EMERGENCY SPILL INFORMATION:
Chicago. Illinois 60601 U.SX 1 (800) 424-9300 CHEMTREC (USA)
OTHER PRODUCT SAFETY INFORMATION:
(312) 856-3907
2.0 COMPOSITION/INFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS
Component CAS#. Range % by Wt.
Gasoline 8006-61-9 85-100
Benzene 71-43-2 1-4
Butane 106-97-8 1-12
Cyclohe?
-------
AMOCO SILVER® LEAD-FREE GASOLINE
MSDS No..03258000
Page 2 of 8
3.0 HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION
EMERGENCY OVERVIEW: Danger! Extremely flammable. High vapor concentrations can cause headaches,
dizziness, drowsiness, and nausea, and may lead to unconsciousness. Harmful If swallowed and/or aspirated
into the lungs. Prolonged or repeated contact may cause irritation and/or dermatitis. Use as motor fuel only.
Long-term exposure to vapors has caused cancer in laboratory animals.
POTENTIAL HEALTH EFFECTS:
EYE CONTACT: High concentrations of vapor/mist may cause eye discomfort.
SKIN CONTACT: Prolonged or repeated contact can defatthe skin and lead to irritation and/or dermatitis.
INHALATION: Can be harmful if high concentrations are Inhaled. High vapor concentrations can cause
headaches, dizziness, drowsiness, and nausea, and may lead to unconsciousness. See "Taxicological
Information" section (Section 11.0).
INGESTION: Harmful or fatal if liquid is aspirated into lungs.
HMIS CODE: (Health:1) (Flammability:3) (Reactivity:0) CHRONIC HEALTH HAZARD.
NFPA CODE: (Health:1) (Flammability:3) (Reactivity:0) CHRONIC HEALTH HAZARD.
4.0 FIRST AID MEASURES
EYE: Flush eyes'with plenty of water. Get medical attention if irritation persists.
SKIN: Wash exposed skin with soap and water. Remove contaminated clothing, including shoes, and thor-
oughly clean and dry before reuse. Get medical attention if irritation develops.
INHALATION: If adverse effects occur, remove to uncontaminated area. Give artificial respiration if not
breathing. Get medical attention.
INGESTION: If swallowed, do NOT induce vomiting. Get immediate medical attention.
Issued: January 19,1995
-------
AMOCO SILVER® LEAD-FREE GASOLINE
MSDS No. 03258000
Page 3 of 8 ,.A£_
5.0 FIRE FIGHTING MEASURES
FLASHPOINT; -45°F
UEL: 7.6%
LEL: 1.3%
AUTOIGN1TION TEMPERATURE: 495.0°F
FLAMMABILITY CLASSIFICATION: Extremely Flammable Liquid.
EXTINGUISHING MEDIA: Agents approved for Class B hazards (e.g., dry chemical, carbon dioxide, foam,
steam) or water fog.
UNUSUAL FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARDS: Extremely flammable vapor/air mixtures form. Extinguishment
of fire before source of vapor is shut off can create an explosive mixture in air.
FIRE-FIGHTING EQUIPMENT: Firefighters should wear full bunker gear, including a positive pressure self-
contained breathing apparatus.
PRECAUTIONS: Keep away from sources of ignition (e.g., heat and open flames). Keep container closed.
Use with adequate ventilation.
HAZARDOUS COMBUSTION PRODUCTS: Burning can produce carbon monoxide and/or carbon dioxide and
other harmful products.
6.0 ACCIDENTAL RELEASE MEASURES
Remove or shut off alt sources of ignition. Wear respirator and spray with water to disperse vapors. Increase
ventilation if possible. Remove mechanically or contain on an absorbent material such as dry sand or earth.
Keep out of sewers and waterways.
7.0 HANDLING AND STORAGE
HANDLING: Use with adequate ventilation. Ground and bond containers when transferring materials. Wash
thoroughly after handling.
STORAGE: Store in flammable liquids storage area. Keep container closed. Store away from heat, ignition
, sources, and open flame in accordance with applicable regulations.
SPECIAL PRECAUTIONS: Keep out of sewers and waterways. Avoid Strang oxidizers. Report spilfs to
appropriate authorities. USE AS MOTOR FUEL ONLY.
Issued: January 19, 1995
-------
AMOCO SILVER® LEAD-FREE GASOLINE
. MSDS No. 03258000
Page 4 of 8
8.0 EXPOSURE CONTROLS / PERSONAL PROTECTION
EYE: None required; however, use of eye protection is good industrial practice.
SKIN: Avoid prolonged or repeated skin contact. Wear protective clothing and gloves if prolonged or
repeated contact is likely.
INHALATION: Use with adequate ventilation. Avoid breathing vapor and/or mist. If ventilation Is inadequate,
use NIOSH certified respirator that will protect against organic vapor and dust/mist.
ENGINEERING CONTROLS: Control airborne concentrations below the exposure guidelines.
EXPOSURE GUIDELINES:
Exposure Limits
OSHA PEL: 300 ppm (1989); Not established. (1971)
OSHA STEL; 500 ppm (1989); Not established.
(1971)
ACGIH TLV-TWA: 300 ppm
ACGIH TLV-STEL: 500 ppm
OSHA PEL: 1 ppm
OSHA STEL 5 ppm
ACGIH TLV-TWA: 10 ppm
OSHA PEL: 800 ppm (1988); Not established. (1971)
ACGIH TLV-TWA: 800 ppm
OSHA PEL: 300 ppm (1989)(1971)
ACGIH TLV-TWA: 300 ppm
OSHA PEL: 100 ppm (1989)(1971)
OSHA STEL: 125 ppm(1989); Not established.
(1971)
ACGIH TLV-TWA: 100 ppm
ACGIH TLV-STEL: 125 ppm
OSHA PEL: 400 ppm (1989); 500 ppm (1971)
OSHA STEL: 500 ppm (1989); Not established.
(1971)
ACGIH TLV-TWA: 400 ppm
ACGIH TLV-STEL: 500 ppm
OSHA PEL: 50 ppm (1989); 500 ppm (1971)
ACGIH TLV-TWA: 50 ppm
OSHA PEL 600 ppm (1989); 1000 ppm (1971)
OSHA STEL: 750 ppm (1989); Not established.
(1971)
ACGIH TLV-TWA: 600 ppm
ACGIH TLV-STEL: 750 ppm
Toluene 108-88-3 OSHA PEL: 100 ppm (1989); 200 ppm (1971)
OSHA STEL: 150 ppm (1989); Not established.
(1971)
OSHA Ceiling: 300 ppm (1971)
ACGIH TLV-TWA: 50 ppm (skin)
Issued: January 19, 1995
Component
Gasoline
Benzene
Butane
Cyclohexane
Ethylbenzene
Heptane
Hexane
Pentane
CAS#
8006-61-9
71-43-2
106-97-8
110-82-7
100-41-4
142-82-5
110-54-3
109-66-0
-------
EXPOSURE GUIDELINES:
Trimethylbenzene
Xylene
Methyl tertiary butyl ether
(MTBE)
Page 5 of 8
25551-13-7
1330-20-7
1634-04-4
Tert-amyl methyl ether (TAME) 994-05-8
AMOCO SILVER® LEAD-FREE GASOLINE
MSDS No. 03258000
OSHA PEL: 25 ppm (1989); Not established. (1971)
ACGIH TLV-TWA: 25 ppm
OSHA PEL: 100 ppm (1989){1971)
OSHA STEL: 150 ppm (1989); Not established.
(1971)
ACGIH TLV-TWA: 100 ppm
ACGIH TLV-STEL: 150 ppm
ACGIH TLV-TWA: 40 ppm
No exposure limit established
9.0 CHEMICAL AND
APPEARANCE AND ODOR:
pH:
VAPOR PRESSURE:
VAPOR DENSITY:
BOILING POINT:
MELTING POINT:
SOLUBILITY IN WATER:
SPECIFIC GRAVITY (WATER = 1):
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
Clear. Liquid. Hydrocarbon odor.
Not determined.
7-15 lb RVP (ASTM D323)
3.0-4.0
80.0-430.0°F (range)
Not determined.
Negligible, below 0.1%.
0.75
10.0 STABILITY AND REACTIVITY
STABILITY; Burning can be started easily.
CONDITIONS TO AVOID: Keep away from ignition sources (e.g. heat, sparks, and open flames).
MATERIALS TO AVOID; Avoid chlorine, fluorine, and other strong oxidizers.
HAZARDOUS DECOMPOSITION: None identified.
HAZARDOUS POLYMERIZATION: Will not occur.
11.0 TOXICOLOGICAL INFORMATION
ACUTE TOXICITY DATA:
EYE IRRITATION: This product had a primary eye irritation score (PEIS) of 0/110.0 (rabbit)
SKIN IRRITATION: This product had a primary skin irritation score (PDIS) of 1.1/8.0 (rabbit)
DERMAL LD50: greater than 5 ml/kg (rabbit).
ORAL LD50: 18.8 ml/kg (rat).
INHALATION LC50: 20.7 mg/l (rat)
Issued: January 19, 1995
-------
v .w • » \i-i- wnwvuniL
MSDS No. 03258000
Page 6 of 8
OTHER TOXICITY DATA:
Excess exposure to vapors may produce headaches, dizziness, nausea, drowsiness, irritation of eyes, nose
and throat and central nervous system depression. Aspiration of this material into the lungs can cause
chemical pneumonia and can be fatal. Aspiration into the lungs can occur while vomiting after ingestion of
this product. Inhalation of whole unleaded gasoline vapors did not produce birth defects in laboratory
animals (although exposure to lead in leaded gasoline may present a reproductive hazard).
In a long-term inhalation study of whole unleaded gasoline vapors, exposure-related kidney damage and
kidney tumors were observed in male rats. Similar kidney effects were not seen in female rats or in mice.
At the highest exposure level (2056 ppm), female mice had an increased incidence of liver tumors. Results
from subsequent scientific studies have shown that a broad variety of chemicals cause these kidney effects
only in the male rat. Further studies have discovered the means by which the physiology of the male rat
uniquely predispose it to these effects. Consequently, the Risk Assessment Forum of the Environmental
Protection Agency has recognized that these responses are not predictive of a human health hazard. The
liver tumors that were increased in the high-dose female mice are likewise of questionable significance
because of their high spontaneous occurrence even without chemical exposure and because the rate of
their occurrence is accelerated by a broad spectrum of chemicals not commonly considered to be
carcinogens (e.g., phenobarbital). Thus, the significance of the mouse liver tumor response in terms of
human health is questionable.
Gasoline is a complex mixture of hydrocarbons and contains benzene (typically no more than 2 vo!ume%),
toluene, and xylene. Chronic exposure to high levels of benzene has been shown to cause cancer
(leukemia) in humans and other adverse blood effects (anemia). Benzene is considered a human
carcinogen by IARC, NTP and OSHA. Over exposure to xylene and toluene can cause irritation to the
upper respiratory tract, headache and narcosis. Some liver damage and lung inflammation were seen in
chronic studies on xylene In guinea pigs but not in rats.
12.0 ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION
Ecological testing has not been conducted on this product by Amoco.
13.0 DISPOSAL INFORMATION
Residues and spilled material are hazardous waste due to ignltability. Disposal must be in accordance with
applicable federal, state, or local regulations. Enciosed-controiied incineration is recommended unless
directed otherwise by applicable ordinances.
Issued: January 19, 1995
-------
AMOCO SILVER® LEAD-FREE GASOLINE
MSDS No. 03258000
Page 7 of 8 r"..
14.0 TRANSPORTATION INFORMATION
U.S. DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
Shipping Name
Hazard Class
Identification Number
Packing Group
Gasoline
3
UN1203
II
INTERNATIONAL INFORMATION:
Sea (IMO/IMDG)
Shipping Name
Not determined.
Air (ICAO/IATA)
Shipping Name
Not determined.
European Road/Rail (ADR/RID)
Shipping Name
Not determined.
Canadian Transportation of Dangerous Goods
Shipping Name Not determined.
15.0 REGULATORY INFORMATION
CERCLA SECTIONS 102A/103 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES (40 CFR PART 302.4): This product is exempt from
the CERCLA reporting requirements under 40 CFR Part 302.4. However, if spilled into waters of the United
States, it may be reportable under 33 CFR Part 153 if it produces a sheen.
SARA TITLE III SECTION 302 EXTREMELY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES (40 CFR PART 355): This product is not
regulated under Section 302 of SARA and 40 CFR Part 355.
SARA TITLE III SECTIONS 311/312 HAZARDOUS CATEGORIZATION (40 CFR PART 370): This product is
defined as hazardous by OSHA under 29 CFR Part 1910.1200(d).
SARA TITLE III SECTION 313 (40 CFR PART 372); This product contains the following substance(s), which is on
the Toxic Chemicals List in 40 CFR Part 372:
Component/CAS Number
Weight Percent
Benzene 71-43-2
4
Cyclohexane 110-82-7
5
Ethylbenzene 100-41-4
2
Xylene 1330-20-7
10
Methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) 1634-04-4
15
Hexane 110-54-3
5
Toluene 108-88-3
22
U.S. INVENTORY (TSCA): Listed on inventory.
OSHA HAZARD COMMUNICATION STANDARD: Flammable liquid. Irritant. Contains components listed by
ACGIH. Contains components listed by OSHA. Contains a carcinogenic component.
Issued: January 19,1995
-------
MSUS No. .03258000
Page 8 of 8
EC INVENTORY (EINECS/ELINCS): Not determined.
JAPAN INVENTORY (MITi): Not determined.
AUSTRALIA INVENTORY (AICS): Not determined.
KOREA INVENTORY (ECL): Not determined.
CANADA INVENTORY (DSL): Not determined.
PHILIPPINE INVENTORY (PICCS): Not determined.
16.0
OTHER INFORMATION
Prepared by:
Environment. Health and Safety Department
Issued: January 19, 1995
Supersedes: September 24, 1993
This material Safety Data Sheet conforms to the requirements of ANSI Z400.1.
This material safety data sheet and the information it contains is offered to you In good faith as accurate. We
have reviewed any information contained in this data sheet which we received from sources outside our
company. We believe that information to be correct but cannot guarantee its accuracy or completeness. Health
and safety precautions in this data sheet may not be adequate for all individuals and/or situations. It is the
user's obligation to evaluate and use this product safely and to comply with all applicable laws and regulations.
No statement made in this data sheet shall be construed as a permission or recommendation for the use of any
product in a manner that might infringe existing patents. No warranty is made, either express or implied.
Issued: January 19,1995
-------
MATERIAL
SUBSTANCE
NO.
|W| SAFETY DATA SHEET
(Chemical Name)
t i.4 - . j j-;
Diesel Fuel
BG-9
PRODUCT NAME, NUMBER, SYNONYM
COMMON OR TRADE NAME
Diesel Fuel/Fuel Oil 02
MANUFACTURER'S NAME AND ADDRESS
TELEPHONE NUMBER
HEALTH HAZARDS
HAZARD RATING I ) DANGER
I
) WARNING K) CAUTION
TYPE OF HAZARD Explosion, Combustible, Ingestion, Skin
Contact
SYMPTOMS Of EXPOSURE
Minor inflamation to skin
EFFECTS OF EXPOSURE
EMERGENCY FIRST AID
Wash with soap and water. Do not induce vomiting if ingested:
physician immediately.
Call
FIRE. EXPLOSION, AND REACTIVITY DATA
EXTINGUISHING AGENTS AND FIRE FIGHTING METHODS
Smother or use A.B.C. Fire extinguisher
FLASH POINT
FLAMMABLE OR EXPLOSIVE LIMIT
OPEN CUP 51. 7 ° C CLOSED CUP
°C
LOWER
% UPPER
%
IGNITION TEMPERATURE
°C
AUTO-IGNITION TEMPERATURE
°C
PRODUCTS FORMED BY FIRE OR EXCESSIVE HEAT
Carbon monoxide
CONDITIONS TO AVOID , .
Sparks, heat
STABILITY fc t Stable ( ) Unstable -
Explain Conditions
INCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS AND REACTIONS
PRODUCTS OF DECOMPOSITION
HAZARDOUS POLYMERIZATION [ ) Will not occur {
) May occur — Explain Reaction and Products
PROTECTION EQUIPMENT
PERSONAL PROTECTION
Rubber gloves and boots
VENTILATION
Vents on confined storage to allow for expansion
ADDITIONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT _ ^ . .
Grounded
tanks for portable tanks
-------
HANDLING AND STORAGE
BG-9
HANDLING AND STORAGE METHODS
Tanks with venting
LEAKAGE AND SPILL CONTROL
Dikes around tanks
WASTE DISPOSAL
Burning
MEDICAL MANAGEMENT
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
PERSONAL HYGIENE
Check for prolonged
skin contact.
MEDICAL RECORDS
PRE-PLACEMENT
PERIODIC
EXPOSURE LIMITS
THRESHOLD LIMIT VALUE
CEILING CONCENTRATION
ODOR THRESHOLD
OTHER
PHYSICAL AMD CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
PHYSICAL STATE
liquid
COLOR
yellow brown
ODOR
dlstinc tive
CHEMICAL FORMULA
CHEMICAL COMPOSITION (BE SPECIFICI
COMPOUND
PERCENT
TLV
COMPOUND
PERCENT
TLV
,
BOILING POINT
°C
MELTING POINT
°c
VAPOR PRESSURE
VAPOR DENSITY
PERCENTAGE VOLATILE
EVAPORATION RATE
SPECIFIC GRAVITY 31 -
39
pH CONCENTRATION
SOLUBILITY
CORROSIVENESS 3 hr. ,
<3 212F MAX
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
ATTACH THE FOLLOWING:
SAFETY INFORMATION FROM PRODUCT LABEL -- ATTACH LABEL OR QUOTE
PRODUCT INFORMATION DATA SHEETS
OTHER MATERIALS
FORM COMPLETION DATE
FORM REVISION DATE
The information herein is given in good faith but no warranty, express or implied, is made.
-------
i i v,4.
DIESEL FUEL, NO. 1
Covers all No.1 diesel fuels, Including low sulfur, low sulfur dyed and high sulfur brands.-?
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET
MSDS No. 11154000
ENGLISH
1.0 CHEMICAL PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION
PRODUCT NAME: DIESEL FUEL, NO. 1
MANUFACTURER/SUPPLIER:
Amoco Oil Company
200 East Randolph Drive '
Chicago, Illinois 60601 U.S.A.
EMERGENCY HEALTH INFORMATION:
1 (800) 447-8735
EMERGENCY SPILL INFORMATION:
1 (800) 424-9300 CHEMTREC (USA)
OTHER PRODUCT SAFETY INFORMATION:
(312) 856-3907
2.0 COMPOSITION/INFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS
Component CAS# Range % by Wt.
Petroleum distillate 95-100
Naphthalene 91-20-3 0-1
Xylene 1330-20-7 0-1
(See Section 8.0, "Exposure Controls/Personal Protection", for exposure guidelines)
3.0 HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION
EMERGENCY OVERVIEW: Warning! Combustible. Harmful or fatal if liquid is aspirated into lungs. Causes
skin Irritation on prolonged or repeated contact.
POTENTIAL HEALTH EFFECTS:
EYE CONTACT: No significant heaith hazards identified.
SKIN CONTACT: Causes skin irritation on prolonged or repeated contact. See Toxicoiogical Information"
section (Section 11.0).
INHALATION: No significant health hazards identified for the liquid fuel. See "Toxicoiogical Information"
section (Section 11.0).
INGESTION: Harmful or fatal if liquid is aspirated into lungs. See "Toxicoiogical Information" section
(Section 11.0).
| HMiS CODE: (Health:2) (Flammability:2) (Reactivity:0)
| NFPA CODE: (Health:2) (Flammability:2) (Reactivity:0)
Issued: January 05, 1995
-------
DIESEL FUEL. NO. 1
MSDS No. 11154000
Page 2 of 6
4.0 FIRST AID MEASURES
EYE: Flush eyes with plenty of water.
SKIN: Wash exposed skin with soap and water. Remove contaminated clothing, including shoes, and thor-
oughly clean and dry before reuse.
INHALATION: If adverse effects occur, remove to uncontaminated area.
INGESTION: If swallowed, do NOT induce vomiting. Get immediate medical attention.
5.0 FIRE FIGHTING MEASURES
FLASHPOINT: 120-180°F (Tag closed cup)
UEL: 7.5%
LEL: 0.6%
| AUTOIGNITION TEMPERATURE: Not determined.
FLAMMABILITY CLASSIFICATION: Combustible Liquid.
EXTINGUISHING MEDIA: Agents approved for Class B hazards (e.g., dry chemical, carbon dioxide, foam,
steam) or water fog.
UNUSUAL FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARDS: Combustible liquid.
FIRE-FIGHTING EQUIPMENT: Firefighters should wear full bunker gear, including a positive pressure self-
contained breathing apparatus.
PRECAUTIONS: Keep away from sources of ignition (e.g., heat and open flames). Use with adequate venti-
lation.
HAZARDOUS COMBUSTION PRODUCTS: Incomplete burning can produce carbon monoxide and/or carbon
dioxide and other harmful products.
6.0 ACCIDENTAL RELEASE MEASURES
Remove or shut off all sources of ignition. Prevent spreading by diking, ditching, or absorbing on Inert mate-
rials. Keep out of sewers and waterways.
7.0 HANDLING AND STORAGE
Use with adequate ventilation. Keep away from (ignition sources (e.g., heat, sparks, or open
Ground and bond containers when transferring materials. Wash thoroughly after handling.
Store in combustible liquids storage area. Store away from heat, ignition sources, and open
accordance with applicable regulations.
HANDLING:
flames).
STORAGE:
flame In
Issued: January 05, 1995
-------
Page 3 of 6
8.0 EXPOSURE CONTROLS / PERSONAL PROTECTION
EYE: None required; however, use of eye protection is good industrial practice.
SKIN: Avoid prolonged or repeated skin contact. Wear protective gloves if prolonged or repeated contact is
likely.
INHALATION: Use with adequate ventilation.
ENGINEERING CONTROLS: Control airborne concentrations below the exposure guidelines.
EXPOSURE GUIDELINES:
Component
Petroleum distillate
Naphthalene
Xylene
CAS# Exposure Limits
No exposure limit established
91-20-3 OSHA PEL: 10 ppm (1989)(1971)
OSHA STEL: 15 ppm (1989): Not established. (1971)
ACGIH TLV-TWA: 10 ppm
ACGIH TLV-STEL: 15 ppm.
1330-20-7 OSHA PEL: 100 ppm (1989)(1971)
OSHA STEL: 150 ppm (1989); Not established.
(1971)
ACGIH TLV-TWA: 100 ppm
ACGIH TLV-STEL: 150 ppm
9.0 CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
APPEARANCE AND ODOR
PH
VAPOR PRESSURE
VAPOR DENSITY
BOILING POINT
MELTING POINT
SOLUBILITY IN WATER
SPECIFIC GRAVITY (WATER = 1)
VISCOSITY
Liquid. Clear or red. Petroleum odor.
Not determined.
Not determined.
Not determined.
340-675°F (approximate range)
Not determined.
Negligible, below 0.1%.
0.85-to 0.88
1.8-3.8cSt at 100"F
Issued: January 05, 1995
-------
DIESEL FUEL. NO. 1
MSDS No. 11154000
Page 4 of 6
10.0 STABILITY AND REACTIVITY
STABILITY: Stable.
CONDITIONS TO AVOID: Keep away from ignition sources (e.g. heat, sparks, and open flames).
MATERIALS TO AVOID: Avoid chlorine, fluorine, and other strong oxidizers.
HAZARDOUS DECOMPOSITION: None identified.
HAZARDOUS POLYMERIZATION: Will not occur.
11.0 TOXICOLOGtCAL INFORMATION
ACUTE TOXICITY DATA:
EYE IRRITATION: Similar products have produced maximum eye irritation scores ranging from 0.33 to
1.0/110.0; 24 hours (rabbits).
SKIN IRRITATION: Similar products have produced primary skin irritation scores ranging from 0.67 to
3.83/8.0 (rabbits). Dermal LD50 for similar products was greater than 2g/kg; practically non-toxic for
acute exposures by this route.
DERMAL LD50: Testing not conducted. See Other Toxicity Data.
ORAL LD50: For a similar product oral LD50 was greater than 5g/kg; practically non-toxic for acute expo-
sures by this route.
INHALATION LC50: Testing not conducted. See Other Toxicity Data.
OTHER TOXICITY DATA:
Middle distillate: From skin-painting studies of petroleum distillates of similar composition and distillate
range, it has been shown that these types of materials often possess weak carcinogenic activity in labora-
tory animals. In these tests, the material is painted on the shaved backs of mice twice a week for their
lifetime. The material is not washed off between applications. Therefore, there may be a potential risk of
* skin cancer from prolonged or repeated skin contact with this product in the absence of good personal
hygiene. This particular product has not been tested for carcinogenic activity, but we have chosen to be
cautious in light of the findings with other distillate streams.
Occasional skin contact with this product is not expected to have serious effects, but good personal
hygiene should be practiced and repeated skin contact avoided. This product can also be expected to
produce skin irritation upon prolonged or repeated skin contact. Personal hygiene measures taken to
prevent skin irritation are expected to be adequate to prevent risk of skin cancer.
Materials of this type have been shown to produce kidney damage in male rats following prolonged
inhalation exposures. Following extensive research, this effect appears to be unique to the male rat and is
considered to be of little or no relevance in terms of human health risk.
This product has a sufficiently low vapor pressure to prevent a hazardous buildup of vapors unless the
product is heated, used in a confined space with inadequate ventilation or misted. Inhalation of mist or
high concentrations of vapors can produce dizziness, headache, and nausea and possibly irritation of the
eye, nose and throat.
Aspiration of this product into the lungs can cause chemical pneumonia and can be fatal. Aspiration into
the lungs can occur while vomiting after ingestion of this product. Do not siphon by mouth.
NIOSH has recommended that whole diesel exhaust be regarded as a potential occupational carcinogen,
based on findings of carcinogenic responses in laboratory animals exposed to whole diesel exhaust. The
excess cancer risk for workers exposed to diesel exhaust has not been calculated; however, exposure
should be minimized to reduce potential risk.
Issued: January 05,1995
-------
Page 5 of 6
DIESEL FUEL, NO. 1
MSDS No. 11154000
No component of this product present at levels greater than 0.1% is identified as a carcinogen by the U.S.
National Toxicology Program, the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Act, or the International Agency on
Research on Cancer (IARC).
12.0 ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION
Ecological testing has not been conducted on this product.
13.0 DISPOSAL INFORMATION
Disposal must be in accordance with applicable federal, state, or local regulations. Enclosed-controlled
incineration is recommended unless directed otherwise by applicable ordinances.
The container for this product can present explosion or fire hazards, even when emptied! To avoid risk of
injury, do not cut, puncture, or weld on or near this container. Since the emptied containers retain product
residue, follow label warnings even after container is emptied.
14.0 TRANSPORTATION INFORMATION
U.S. DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
Shipping Name
Hazard Class
Identification Number
Packing Group
Diesel Fuel
Combustible liquid.
NA1993
INTERNATIONAL INFORMATION:
Sea (IMO/IMDG)
| Shipping Name Not determined.
Air (ICAO/IATA)
| Shipping Name Not determined.
European Road/Rail (ADR/RID)
| Shipping Name Not determined.
Canadian Transportation of Dangerous Goods
| Shipping Name Not determined.
Issued: January 05, 1995
-------
DIESEL FUEL, NO. 1
MSDS No. 11154000
Page 6 of 6
15.0 REGULATORY INFORMATION
CERCLA SECTIONS 102A/103 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES (40 CFR PART 302.4): This product is exempt from
the CERCLA reporting requirements under 40 CFR Part 302.4. However, if spilled into waters of the United
States, it may be reportable under 33 CFR Part 153 if it produces a sheen.
SARA TITLE III SECTION 302 EXTREMELY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES (40 CFR PART 355): This product is not
regulated under Section 302 of SARA and 40 CFR Part 355.
SARA TITLE III SECTIONS 311/312 HAZARDOUS CATEGORIZATION (40 CFR PART 370): This product is
defined as hazardous by OSHA under 29 CFR Part 1910.1200(d).
SARA TITLE III SECTION 313 (40 CFR PART 372): This product contains the following substance(s), which is on
the Toxic Chemicals List in 40 CFR Part 372:
Component/CAS Number
Weight Percent
Xylene 1330-20-7
1
Naphthalene 91-20-3
1
U.S. INVENTORY (TSCA): Listed on inventory.
OSHA HAZARD COMMUNICATION STANDARD: Combustible liquid, irritant.
| EC INVENTORY (EINECS/ELINCS): Not determined.
{ JAPAN INVENTORY (MITI): Not determined.
| AUSTRALIA INVENTORY (AICS): Not determined.
| KOREA INVENTORY (ECL): Not determined.
| CANADA INVENTORY (DSL): Not determined.
| PHILIPPINE INVENTORY (PICCS): Not determined.
16.0 OTHER INFORMATION
Prepared by:
| Environment, Health and Safety Department Issued: January 05, 1995
| Supersedes: April 08. 1994
This material Safety Data Sheet conforms to the requirements of ANSI Z400.1.
This material safety data sheet and the information it contains is offered to you in good faith as accurate. We
have reviewed any information contained in this data sheet which we received from sources outside our
company. We believe that information to be correct but cannot guarantee its accuracy or completeness. Health
and safety precautions In this data sheet may hot be adequate for all individuals andlor situations. It is the
user's obligation to evaluate and use this product safely and to comply with all applicable laws and regulations.
No statement made in this data sheet shall be construed as a permission or recommendation for the use of any
product in a manner that might infringe existing patents. No warranty is made, either express or implied.
Issued: January 05,1995
-------
DIESEL FUEL, NO. 2
Covers all No.2 diesel fuels, including low sulfur, low sulfur dyed and high sulfur brands.
[AMOCO)
" ^-^v.-
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET MSDS No. 11155000
ENGLISH
1.0 CHEMICAL PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION
PRODUCT NAME: DIESEL FUEL, NO. 2
MANUFACTURER/SUPPLIER:
Amoco Oil Company
200 East Randolph Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60601 U.S.A.
EMERGENCY HEALTH INFORMATION:
1 (800) 447-8735
EMERGENCY SPILL INFORMATION:
1 (800) 424-9300 CHEMTREC (USA)
OTHER PRODUCT SAFETY INFORMATION:
(312) 856-3907
2.0 COMPOSITION/INFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS
Component CAS# Ranoe % by Wt.
Petroleum distillate 68476-30-2 95-100
Naphthalene 91-20-3 0-1
Xylene 1330-20-7 0-1
(See Section 8.0, "Exposure Controls/Personal Protection", for exposure guidelines)
3.0 HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION
EMERGENCY OVERVIEW: Warning! Combustible. Harmful or fatal if liquid is aspirated into lungs. Causes
skin irritation on prolonged or repeated contact.
POTENTIAL HEALTH EFFECTS:
EYE CONTACT: No significant health hazards identified.
SKIN CONTACT: Causes skin irritation on prolonged or repeated contact. See "Toxicological Information"
section (Section 11.0).
INHALATION: No significant health hazards identified for the liquid fuel. See "Toxicological Information"
section (Section 11.0).
INGESTION: Harmful or fatal if liquid is aspirated into lungs. See "Toxicological Information" section
(Section 11.0).
| HMIS CODE: (Health:2) (Flammability:2) (Reactlvity.O)
| NFPA CODE: (Health:2) (Flammability:2) (Reactivity.O)
Issued: January 05, 1995
-------
DIESEL FUEL, NO. 2
MSDS No. 17155000
Page 2 of 6
4.0 FIRST AID MEASURES
EYE: Flush eyes with plenty of water.
SKIN; Wash exposed skin with soap and water. Remove contaminated clothing, including shoes, and thor-
oughly clean and dry before reuse.
INHALATION: If adverse effects occur, remove to uncontaminated area.
INGESTION: If swallowed, do NOT induce vomiting. Get immediate medical attention.
5.0 FIRE FIGHTING MEASURES
FLASHPOINT: 120-180°F (Tag closed cup)
UEL: 7.5%
LEL: 0.6%
| AUTOIGNITJON TEMPERATURE: Not determined.
FLAMMABILITY CLASSIFICATION: Combustible Liquid.
EXTINGUISHING MEDIA: Agents approved for Class B hazards (e.g., dry chemical, carbon dioxide, foam,
steam) or water fog.
UNUSUAL FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARDS: Combustible liquid.
FIRE-FIGHTING EQUIPMENT: Firefighters should wear full bunker gear, including a positive pressure self-
contained breathing apparatus.
PRECAUTIONS: Keep away from sources of ignition (e.g., heat and open flames). Use with adequate venti-
lation.
HAZARDOUS COMBUSTION PRODUCTS: Incomplete burning can produce carbon monoxide and/or carbon
dioxide and other harmful products.
6.0 ACCIDENTAL RELEASE MEASURES
Remove or shut off all sources of ignition. Prevent spreading by diking, ditching, or absorbing on inert mate-
rials. Keep out of sewers and waterways.
7.0 HANDLING AND STORAGE
HANDLING: Use with adequate ventilation. Keep away from ignition sources (e.g., heat, sparks, or open
flames). Ground and bond containers when transferring materials. Wash thoroughly after handling.
STORAGE: Store in combustible liquids storage area. Store away from heat, ignition sources, and open
flame in accordance with applicable regulations.
Issued: January 05, 1995
-------
DIESEL FUEL, NO. 2
MSDS No. 11155000
Page 3 of 6
¦ • u
V!' . r
•V <>'
8.0 EXPOSURE CONTROLS / PERSONAL PROTECTION
EYE: None required; however, use of eye protection is good industrial practice.
SKIN: Avoid prolonged or repeated skin contact. Wear protective gloves if prolonged or repeated contact is
likely.
INHALATION: Use with adequate ventilation.
ENGINEERING CONTROLS: Control airborne concentrations below the exposure guidelines.
EXPOSURE GUIDELINES:
Component
Petroleum distillate
Naphthalene
Xylene
CAS# Exposure Limits
68476-30-2 No exposure limit established
91-20-3 OSHA PEL: 10 ppm (1989)(1971)
OSHA STEL: 15 ppm (1989); Not established. (1971)
ACGIH TLV-TWA: 10 ppm
ACGIH TLV-STEL: 15 ppm
1330-20-7 OSHA PEL: 100 ppm (1989)(1971)
OSHA STEL: 150 ppm (1989): Not established.
(1971)
ACGIH TLV-TWA: 100 ppm
ACGIH TLV-STEL: 150 ppm
9.0 CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
APPEARANCE AND ODOR
PH
VAPOR PRESSURE
VAPOR DENSITY
BOILING POINT
MELTING POINT
SOLUBILITY IN WATER
SPECIFIC GRAVITY (WATER = 1)
VISCOSITY
Liquid. Clear or red. Petroleum odor.
Not determined.
Not determined.
.Not determined.
340-675"F (approximate range)
Not determined.
Negligible, below 0.1%.
0.85 to 0.8B
1.8-3.6cSt at 100°F
t
Issued: January 05, 1995
-------
DIESEL FU£U NO. 2
MSDS No. 11155000
Page 4 of 6
10.0 STABILITY AND REACTIVITY
STABILITY: Stable.
CONDITIONS TO AVOID: Keep away from ignition sources (e.g. heat, sparks, and open flames).
MATERIALS TO AVOID: Avoid chlorine, fluorine, and other strong oxidizers.
HAZARDOUS DECOMPOSITION: None identified.
HAZARDOUS POLYMERIZATION: Will not occur.
11.0 TOXICOLOGICAL INFORMATION
ACUTE TOXICITY DATA:
EYE IRRITATION: Similar products have produced maximum eye irritation scores ranging from 0,33 to
*l.0m0.0; 24 hours (rabbits).
SKIN IRRITATION: Similar products have produced primary skin irritation scores ranging from 0.67 to
3.83/8.0 (rabbits). Dermal LD50 for similar products was greater than 2g/kg; practically non-toxic for
acute exposures by this route.
DERMAL LD50: Testing not conducted. See Other Toxicity Data.
ORAL LD50: For a similar product oral LD50 was greater than 5g/kg; practically non-toxic for acute expo-
sures by this route.
INHALATION LC50: Testing not conducted. See Other Toxicity Data.
OTHER TOXICITY DATA:
Middle distillate: From skin-painting studies of petroleum distillates of similar composition and distillate
range, it has been shown that these types of materials often possess weak carcinogenic activity in labora-
tory animals. In these tests, the material is painted on the shaved backs of mice twice a week for their
lifetime. The material is not washed off between applications. Therefore, there may be a potential risk of
skin cancer from prolonged or repeated skin contact with this product in the absence of good personal
hygiene. This particular product has not been tested for carcinogenic activity, but we have chosen to be
cautious in tight of the findings with other distillate streams.
Occasional skin contact with this product is not expected to have serious effects, but good personal
hygiene should be practiced and repeated skin contact avoided. This product can also be expected to
produce skin irritation upon prolonged or repeated skin contact. Personal hygiene measures taken to
prevent skin irritation are expected to be adequate to prevent risk of skin cancer.
Materials of this type have been shown to produce kidney damage in male rats following prolonged
inhalation exposures. Following extensive research, this effect appears to be unique to the male rat and is
considered to be of little or no relevance in terms of human health risk.
This product has a sufficiently low vapor pressure to prevent a hazardous buildup of vapors unless the
product is heated, used in a confined space with inadequate ventilation or misted. Inhalation of mist or
high concentrations of vapors can produce dizziness, headache, and nausea and possibly irritation of the
eye, nose and throat.
Aspiration of this product into the lungs can cause chemical pneumonia and can be fatal. Aspiration into
the lungs can occur while vomiting after ingestion of this product. Do not siphon by mouth.
NIOSH has recommended that whole diesei exhaust be regarded as a potential occupational carcinogen,
baaed on findings of carcinogenic responses in laboratory animals exposed to whole diesei exhaust. The
excess cancer risk for workers exposed to diesei exhaust has not been calculated; however, exposure
should be minimized to reduce potential risk.
Issued: January 05, 1995
-------
Page 5 of 6
DIESEL FUEL. NO. 2
MSDS No. 11155000
No component of this product present at levels greater than 0.1% is identified as a carcinogen by the U.S.
National Toxicology Program, the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Act, or the International Agency on
Research on Cancer (IARC).
12.0 ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION
Ecological testing has not been conducted on this product.
13.0 DISPOSAL INFORMATION
Disposal must be in accordance with applicable federal, state, or local regulations. Enclosed-controlled
incineration is recommended unless directed otherwise by applicable ordinances.
The container for this product can present explosion or fire hazards, even when emptied! To avoid risk of
injury, do not cut, puncture, or weld on or near this container. Since the emptied containers retain product
residue, follow label warnings even after container is emptied.
14.0 TRANSPORTATION INFORMATION
U.S. DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION
Shipping Name
Hazard Class
Identification Number
Packing Group
Diesel Fuel
Combustible liquid.
NA1993
INTERNATIONAL INFORMATION:
Sea (IMO/IMDG)
Shipping Name
Not determined.
Air (ICAO/IATA)
Shipping Name
Not determined.
European Road/Rail (ADR/RID)
Shipping Name
Not determined.
Canadian Transportation of Dangerous Goods
Shipping Name
Not determined.
Issued; January 05, 1995
-------
DIESEL FUEL, NO. 2
M&3S No. 11155000
Page 6 of 6
15.0 REGULATORY INFORMATION
CERCLA SECTIONS 102A/103 HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES (40 CFR PART 302.4): This product is exempt from
tfte CERCLA reporting requirements under 40 CFR Part 302.4. However, if spilled into waters of the United
States, it may be reportable under 33 CFR Part 153 if it produces a sheen.
SARA TITLE III SECTION 302 EXTREMELY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES (40 CFR PART 355): This product is not
regulated under Section 302 of SARA and 40 CFR Part 355.
SARA TITLE III SECTIONS 311/312 HAZARDOUS CATEGORIZATION (40 CFR PART 370): This product is
defined as hazardous by OSHA under 29 CFR Part 1910.1200(d).
SARA TITLE III SECTION 313 (40 CFR PART 372): This product contains the following substance(s), which is on
the Toxic Chemicals List in 40 CFR Part 372:
Component/CAS Number
Weight Percent
Xylene 1330-20-7
1
Naphthalene 91-20-3
1
U.S. INVENTORY (TSCA): Listed on inventory.
OSHA HAZARD COMMUNICATION STANDARD: Combustible liquid. Irritant.
EC INVENTORY (EINECS/ELINCS): Not determined.
JAPAN INVENTORY (MITI): Not determined.
AUSTRALIA INVENTORY (AICS): Not determined.
KOREA INVENTORY (ECL): Not determined.
CANADA INVENTORY (DSL): Not determined.
PHILIPPINE INVENTORY (PICCS): Not determined.
16.0 OTHER INFORMATION
BY:
[ Donald M. Barker, Director Issued: January 05, 1995
| Product Stewardship & Toxicology Supersedes: April 08, 1994
This material Safety Data Sheet conforms to the requirements of ANSI Z400.1.
This material safety data sheet and the information it contains is offered to you in good faith as accurate. We
have reviewed any information contained in this data sheet which we received from sources outside our
company. We believe that information to be correct but cannot guarantee its accuracy or completeness. Health
and safety precautions in this data sheet may not be adequate for all individuals and/or situations. It is the
uses's obligation to evaluate and use this product safely and to comply with all applicable laws and regulations.
No statement made in this data sheet shall be construed as a permission or recommendation for the use of any
product in a manner that might infringe existing patents. No warranty is made, either express or implied.
Issued: January 05,1995
-------
MSDS- https://cglapps.chevron.com/msdspds/MSDSDetailPage.aspx7docData...
Material Safety Data Sheet
| SECTION 1 PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION
Chevron Delo® Extended Life Coolant/Antifreeze
Product Use: Antifreeze/Coolant
Product Number(s): CPS227804
Company identification
Chevron Products Company
a division of Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
6001 Bollinger Canyon Road
San Ramon, CA 94563
United States of America
www.chevronlubricants.com
Transportation Emergency Response
CHEMTREC: (800) 424-9300 or (703) 527-3887
Health Emergency
Chevron Emergency Information Center: Located in the USA. International collect calls accepted. (800) 231-0623
or(510) 231-0623
Product Information
email: lubemsds@Chevron.com
Product Information: (800) LUBE TEK
MSDS Requests: (800) 414-6737
SECTION 2 COMPOSITION/ INFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS
COMPONENTS
CAS NUMBER
AMOUNT
Ethylene Glycol 1
107-21-1
80 - 95 %weight
Sodium 2-ethylhexanoate i
19766-89-3
1-5 %weight
Dlethylene glycol
111-46-6
1-5 %weight
SECTION 3 HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION
EMERGENCY OVERVIEW
- HARMFUL OR FATAL IF SWALLOWED
- CONTAINS MATERIAL THAT MAY CAUSE ADVERSE REPRODUCTIVE EFFECTS BASED ON ANIMAL DATA
- POSSIBLE BIRTH DEFECT HAZARD - CONTAINS MATERIAL THAT MAY CAUSE BIRTH DEFECTS BASED
ON ANIMAL DATA
- CAUSES DAMAGE TO:
- KIDNEY
IMMEDIATE HEALTH EFFECTS
Eye: Not expected to cause prolonged or significant eye irritation.
Skin: Contact with the skin is not expected to cause prolonged or significant irritation. Not expected to be harmful
4 .c c n* I
-------
MSDS-
https://cgIapps.chevron.com/msdspds/MSDSDetaiIPage.aspx7docData..
i V /
to internal organs if absorbed through the skin. .<(¦<'/
Ingestion: Toxic; may be harmful or fatal if swallowed.
Inhalation: The vapor or fumes from this material may cause respiratory irritation. Symptoms of respiratory
irritation may include coughing and difficulty breathing. Breathing this material at concentrations above the
recommended exposure limits may cause central nervous system effects. Central nervous system effects may
include headache, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, weakness, loss of coordination, blurred vision, drowsiness,
confusion, or disorientation. At extreme exposures, central nervous system effects may include respiratory
depression, tremors or convulsions, loss of consciousness, coma or death.
DELAYED OR OTHER HEALTH EFFECTS:
Reproduction and Birth Defects: Contains material that may cause adverse reproductive effects if swallowed
based on animal data.Contains material that may cause birth defects based on animal data.
Target Organs: Contains material that causes damage to the following organ(s) if swallowed: Kidney
See Section 11 for additional information. Risk depends on duration and level of exposure.
! SECTION 4 FIRST AID MEASURES
Eye: No specific first aid measures are required. As a precaution, remove contact lenses, if worn, and flush eyes
with water.
Skin: No specific first aid measures are required. As a precaution, remove clothing and shoes if contaminated. To
remove the material from skin, use soap and water. Discard contaminated clothing and shoes or thoroughly clean
before reuse.
ingestion: If swallowed, get immediate medical attention. Do not induce vomiting. Never give anything by mouth to
an unconscious person.
Inhalation: Move the exposed person to fresh air. If not breathing, give artificial respiration. If breathing is difficult,
give oxygen. Get medical attention if breathing difficulties continue.
SECTION 5 FIRE FIGHTING MEASURES I
FIRE CLASSIFICATION:
OSHA Classification (29 CFR 1910.1200): Not classified by OSHA as flammable or combustible.
NFPA RATINGS: Health: 2 Flammability: 1 Reactivity: 0
FLAMMABLE PROPERTIES:
Flashpoint: (Pensky-Martens Closed Cup) 127 "C (260 °F)
Autoignition: No Data Available
Flammability (Explosive) Limits (% by volume in air): Lower: 3.2 Upper:
EXTINGUISHING MEDIA: Dry Chemical, C02, AFFF Foam or alcohol resistant foam.
PROTECTION OF FIRE FIGHTERS:
Fire Fighting Instructions: This material will bum although it is not easily ignited. For fires involving this material,
do not enter any enclosed or confined fire space without proper protective equipment, including self-contained
breathing apparatus.
Combustion Products: Highly dependent on combustion conditions. A complex mixture of airborne solids, liquids,
and gases including carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and unidentified organic compounds will be evolved when
this material undergoes combustion.
| SECTION 6 ACCIDENTAL RELEASE MEASURES
Protective Measures: Eliminate all sources of ignition in vicinity of spilled material.
Spill Management: Stop the source of the release if you can do it without risk. Contain release to prevent further
contamination of soil, surface water or groundwater. Clean up spill as soon as possible, observing precautions in
Exposure Controls/Personal Protection. Use appropriate techniques such as applying non-combustible absorbent
materials or pumping. Where feasible and appropriate, remove contaminated soil. Place contaminated materials in
i m
A 11 n nn in a . c e m i
-------
https://cgIapps.chevron.com/msdspds/MSDSDetailPage.aspx7docData..
disposable containers and dispose of in a manner consistent with applicable regulations.
Reporting: Report spills to local authorities and/or the U.S. Coast Guard's National Response Center at (800)
424-8802 as appropriate or required.
SECTION 7 HANDLING AND STORAGE
Precautionary Measures: Do not get in eyes, on skin, or on clothing. Do not breathe vapor or fumes. Wash
thoroughly after handling.
General Handling Information: Do not taste or swallow antifreeze or solutioa Keep out of the reach of children
and animals.
Static Hazard: Electrostatic charge may accumulate and create a hazardous condition when handling this material.
To minimize this hazard, bonding and grounding may be necessary but may not, by themselves, be sufficient.
Review all operations which have the potential of generating and accumulating an electrostatic charge and/or a
flammable atmosphere (including tank and container filling, splash filling, tank cleaning, sampling, gauging, switch
loading, filtering, mixing, agitation, and vacuum truck operations) and use appropriate mitigating procedures. For
more information, refer to OSHA Standard 29 CFR 1910.106, 'Flammable and Combustible Liquids', National Fire
Protection Association (NFPA 77, 'Recommended Practice on Static Electricity', and/or the American Petroleum
Institute (API) Recommended Practice 2003, 'Protection Against Ignitions Arising Out of Static, Lightning, and
Stray Currents'.
General Storage Information: Do not store in open or unlabeled containers.
Container Warnings: Container is not designed to contain pressure. Do not use pressure to empty container or it
may rupture with explosive force. Empty containers retain product residue (solid, liquid, and/or vapor) and can be
dangerous. Do not pressurize, cut, weld, braze, solder, drill, grind, or expose such containers to heat, flame,
sparks, static electricity, or other sources of ignition. They may explode and cause injury or death. Empty
containers should be completely drained, properly closed, and promptly returned to a drum reconditioner or
disposed of properly.
IfSECTION 8 EXPOSURE CONTROLS/PERSONAL PROTECTION !
1 _ \
GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS: ~
Consider the potential hazards of this materia) (see Section 3), applicable exposure limits, job activities, and other
substances in the work place when designing engineering controls and selecting personal protective equipment. If
engineering controls or work practices are not adequate to prevent exposure to harmful levels of this material, the
personal protective equipment listed below is recommended. The user should read and understand all instructions
and limitations supplied with the equipment since protection is usually provided for a limited time or under certain
circumstances.
ENGINEERING CONTROLS:
Use process enclosures, local exhaust ventilation, or other engineering controls to control airborne levels below the
recommended exposure limits.
PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
Eye/Face Protection: No special eye protection is normally required. Where splashing Is possible, wear safety
glasses with side shields as a good safety practice.
Skin Protection: No special protective clothing is normally required. Where splashing is possible, select protective
clothing depending on operations conducted, physical requirements and other substances in the workplace.
Suggested materials for protective gloves include: Natural rubber, Neoprene, Nitrile Rubber, Polyvinyl Chloride
(PVC or Vinyl).
Respiratory Protection: Determine if airborne concentrations are below the recommended occupational exposure
limits for jurisdiction of use. If airborne concentrations are above the acceptable limits, wear an approved respirator
that provides adequate protection from this material, such as: Air-Purifying Respirator for Organic Vapors, Dusts
and Mists.
Use a positive pressure air-supplying respirator In circumstances where air-purifying respirators may not provide
adequate protection.
(Component
Agency
|TWA
STEL i
Ceiling
Notation
Ethylene Glycol
ACGIH
100 mg/m3
-
At 10/Ortl ft DM
-------
https://cglapps.chevron.convfmsdspds/MSDSDetailPage.aspx?docData..
SECTION 9 PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
Attention: the data below are typical values and do not constitute a specification.
Color: Red
Physical State: Liquid
Odor: Faint or Mild
pH: 8-8.6
Vapor Pressure: 0.12 mmHg (Typical) @ 20 °C (68 °F)
Vapor Density (Air = 1): 2.1
Boiling Point: 108.9°C (22B°F)
Solubility: Miscible
Freezing Point: -36.7°C (-34°F)
Specific Gravity: 1.12 @ 15.6°C (60.1°F) / 16.6°C (60.1°F)
Volatile Organic
Compounds (VOC): 91.2 %weight
Chemical Stability: This material is considered stable under normal ambient and anticipated storage and handling
conditions of temperature and pressure.
Incompatibility With Other Materials: May react with strong acids or strong oxidizing agents, such as chlorates,
nitrates, peroxides, etc.
Hazardous Decomposition Products: Aldehydes (Elevated temperatures), Ketones (Elevated temperatures)
Hazardous Polymerization: Hazardous polymerization will not occur.
! SECTION 11 TOPOLOGICAL INFORMATION \
IMMEDIATE HEALTH EFFECTS
Eye Irritation: The eye irritation hazard is based on evaluation of data for similar materials or product components.
Skin Irritation: The skin irritation hazard is based on evaluation of data for similar materials or product
components.
Skin Sensitization: No product toxicology data available.
Acute Dermal Toxicity: The acute dermal toxicity hazard is based on evaluation of data for similar materials or
product components.
Acute Oral Toxicity: The acute oral toxicity hazard is based on evaluation of data for similar materials or product
components.
Acute Inhalation Toxicity: The acute inhalation toxicity hazard is based on evaluation of data for similar materials
or product components.
ADDITIONAL TOXICOLOGY INFORMATION:
This product contains diethylene glycol (DEG). The estimated oral lethal dose is about 50 cc (1.6 oz) for an adult
human. DEG has caused the following effects in laboratory animals: liver abnormalities, kidney damage and blood
abnormalities. It has been suggested as a cause of the following effects in humans: liver abnormalities, kidney
damage, lung damage and central nervous system damage.
This product contains ethylene glycol (EG). The toxicity of EG via inhalation or skin contact is expected to be slight
at room temperature. The estimated oral lethal dose is about 100 cc (3.3 oz.) for an adult human. Ethylene glycol
is oxidized to oxalic acid which results in the deposition of calcium oxalate crystals mainly in the brain and kidneys.
Early signs and symptoms of EG poisoning may resemble those of alcohol intoxication. Later, the victim may
experience nausea, vomiting, weakness, abdominal and muscle pain, difficulty in breathing and decreased urine
output. When EG was heated above the boiling point of water, vapors formed which reportedly caused
unconsciousness, increased lymphocyte count, and a rapid, jerky movement of the eyes in persons chronically
exposed. When EG was administered orally to pregnant rats and mice, there was an increase in fetal deaths and
-------
P/USUS
https://cglapps.chevron.com'msdspds/MSDSDetailPage.aspx?docData..
:;v / 'I-
birth defects. Some of these effects occurred at doses that had no toxic effects on the mothers. We are not aware
of any reports that EG causes reproductive toxicity in human beings.
2-Ethylhexanoic acid (2-EXA) caused an increase in liver size and enzyme levels when repeatedly administered to
rats via the diet. When administered to pregnant rats by gavage or in drinking water, 2-EXA caused teratogenicity
(birth defects) and delayed postnatal development of the pups. Additionally, 2-EXA impaired female fertility in rats.
Birth defects were seen in the offspring of mice who were administered sodium 2-ethylhexanoate via intraperitoneal
injection during pregnancy.
! SECTION 12 ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION
ECOTOXICITY
The toxicity of this material to aquatic organisms has not been evaluated. Consequently, this material should be
kept out of sewage and drainage systems and all bodies of water.
ENVIRONMENTAL FATE
This material is expected to be readily biodegradable.
| SECTION 13 DISPOSAL CONSIDERATIONS
Use material for its intended purpose or recycle if possible. Oil collection services are available for used oil
recycling or disposal. Place contaminated materials in containers and dispose of in a manner consistent with
applicable regulations. Contact your sales representative or local environmental or health authorities for approved
disposal or recycling methods.
SECTION 14 TRANSPORT INFORMATION I
The description shown may not apply to all shipping situations. Consult 49CFR, or appropriate Dangerous Goods
Regulations, for additional description requirements (e.g., technical name) and mode-specific or quantity-specific
shipping requirements.
DOT Shipping Description: Anti-freeze Preparations, Proprietary
Additional Information:Bulk shipments with a reportable quantity (5000 pounds) of ethylene glycol are a
hazardous material. The Proper Shipping Name is: Environmentally Hazardous Substance, Liquid, N.O.S. (ethylene
glycol), 9, UN3082, HI, RQ (ethylene glycol).
IMO/IMDG Shipping Description: NOT REGULATED AS DANGEROUS GOODS FOR TRANSPORTATION
UNDER THE IMDG CODE
ICAO/IATA Shipping Description: Anti-freeze Preparations, Proprietary; NOT REGULATED AS DANGEROUS
GOODS FOR TRANSPORT UNDER ICAO
j SECTION 15 REGULATORY INFORMATION i
EPCRA 311/312 CATEGORIES: 1. Immediate (Acute) Health Effects: YES
2. Delayed (Chronic) Health Effects: YES
3. Fire Hazard: NO
4. Sudden Release of Pressure Hazard: NO
5. Reactivity Hazard: NO
REGULATORY LISTS SEARCHED:
01-1=1ARC Group 1 03=EPCRA313
nf 7
/l-« dxa
-------
MSJJS
http3://cglapps.che vron.com/msdspds/MSDSDetaiIPage.aspx?docData..
01-2A=IARC Group 2A
01-2B=IARC Group 2B
02=NTP Carcinogen
The following components of this material are found on the regulatory lists indicated.
Diethylene glycol 07
Ethylene Glycol 03, 05, 06, 07
CHEMICAL INVENTORIES:
All components comply with the following chemical inventory requirements: AICS (Australia), DSL (Canada),
EINECS (European Union), IECSC (China), KECI (Korea), PICCS (Philippines), TSCA (United States).
One or more components does not comply with the following chemical inventory requirements: ENCS (Japan).
NEW JERSEY RTK CLASSIFICATION:
Refer to components listed in Section 2.
WHMIS CLASSIFICATION:
Class D, Division 1, Subdivision B: Toxic Material -
Acute Lethality
Class D, Division 2, Subdivision A: Very Toxic Material -
Teratogenicity and Embryotoxicity
Reproductive Toxicity
j SECTION 16 OTHER INFORMATION (
NFPA RATINGS: Health: 2 Flammability: 1 Reactivity : 0
HMIS RATINGS: Health: 2* Flammability: 1 Reactivity: 0
(O-Least, 1-Slight, 2-Moderate, 3-High, 4-Extreme, PPE:- Personal Protection Equipment Index recommendation,
*- Chronic Effect Indicator). These values are obtained using the guidelines or published evaluations prepared by
the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) or the National Paint and Coating Association (for HMIS ratings).
LABEL RECOMMENDATION:
Label Category : ANTIFREEZE/COOLANT" 3
REVISION STATEMENT: This revision updates the following sections of this Material Safety Data Sheet:
2,5,7,10,14,15,16
Revision Date: 01/13/2006
ABBREVIATIONS THAT MAY HAVE BEEN USED IN THIS DOCUMENT:
TLV - Threshold Limit Value
TWA - Time Weighted Average
STEL - Short-term Exposure Limit
PEL - Permissible Exposure Limit
CAS - Chemical Abstract Service Number
ACGIH - American Conference of Government Industrial:
Hygienists
IMO/IMDG - International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code
API - American Petroleum Institute
MSDS - Material Safety Data Sheet
CVX - Chevron
NFPA - National Fire Protection Association (USA)
DOT - Department of Transportatlon (USA)
NTP - National Toxicology Program (USA)
IARC - International Agency for Research on Cancer
OSHA' Occupational Safety and Health Administration
04=CA Proposition 05
05=MA RTK
06=NJ RTK
07=PA RTK
r.f'7
/imnnin dm
-------
I
Prepared according to the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200) and the ANSI
MSDS Standard (2400.1) by the Chevron Energy Research & Technology Company, 100 Chevron Way,
Richmond, California 94802.
- The above information Is based on the data of which we are aware and is believed to be correct as
of the date hereof. Since this information may be applied under conditions beyond our control and
with which we may be unfamiliar and since data made available subsequent to the date hereof may
suggest modifications of the information, we do not assume any responsibility for the results of its
! use. This Information is furnished upon condition that the person receiving it shall make his own
i determination of the suitability of the material for his particular purpose.
-------
MSDS https://cglapps.chevron.com/xnsdspds/MSDSDetailPage.aspx7docData...
•" • ' fjh ') '! '
rT--
Material Safety Data Sheet
SECTION 1 PRODUCT AND COMPANY IDENTIFICATION
Chevron URSA® Super Plus EC SAE 15W-40
Product Number(s): CPS271201
Company Identification
Chevron Products Company
a division of Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
6001 Bollinger Canyon Rd.
San Ramon, CA 94583
United States of America
www.chevronIubricants.com
Transportation Emergency Response
CHEMTREC: (800) 424-9300 or (703) 527-3887
Health Emergency
Chevron Emergency Information Center: Located in the USA. International collect calls accepted. (800) 231-0623
or (510) 231-0623
Product information
email: lubemsds@chevron.com
Product Information: (800) LUBE TEK
MSDS Requests: (800) 414-6737
SECTION 2 COMPOSITION/ INFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS
>
!
COMPONENTS
CAS NUMBER
AMOUNT
Highly refined mineral oil (C15 - C50) '
Mixture
70 -100 %weight
Zinc alkyl dithiophosphate ;
68649-42-3
1-5 %weight
SECTION 3 HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION
IMMEDIATE HEALTH EFFECTS
Eye: Not expected to cause prolonged or significant eye irritation.
Skin: Repeated contact with the skin may cause irritation. Contact with the skin is not expected to cause an
allergic skin response. Symptoms may include pain, itching, discoloration, swelling, and blistering. Not expected to
be harmful to internal organs if absorbed through the skin.
Ingestion: Not expected to be harmful if swallowed.
Inhalation: Not expected to be harmful if inhaled. Contains a petroleum-based mineral oil. May cause respiratory
irritation or other pulmonary effects following prolonged or repeated inhalation of oil mist at airborne levels above
the recommended mineral oil mist exposure limit. Symptoms of respiratory irritation may include coughing and
difficulty breathing.
SECTION 4 FIRST AID MEASURES
Eye: No specific first aid measures are required. As a precaution, remove contact lenses, if worn, and flush eyes
I of 6
4/12/2010 3:49 PM
-------
MSDS
https://cglapps.chevron.com/rasdspds/MSDSDetailPage.aspx7docData.
with water.
Skin: To remove the material from skin, use soap and water. Discard contaminated clothing and shoes or
thoroughly clean before reuse.
Ingestion: No specific first aid measures are required. Do not induce vomiting. As a precaution, get medical
advice.
Inhalation: No specific first aid measures are required. If exposed to excessive levels of material in the air, move
the exposed personi to.fresh air J3gM^jcd_^.entio^ discomfort occurs.
SECTION 5 FIRE FIGHTING MEASURES
FIRE CLASSIFICATION:
OSHA Classification (29 CFR 1910.1200): Not classified by OSHA as flammable or combustible.
NFPA RATINGS: Health: 0 Flammability: 1 Reactivity: 0
FLAMMABLE PROPERTIES:
Flashpoint: {Cleveland Open Cup) 215 "C (419 °F) (Min)
Autoignition: No Data Available
Flammability (Explosive) Limits (% by volume in air): Lower: Not Applicable Upper: Not Applicable
EXTINGUISHING MEDIA: Use water fog, foam, dry chemical or carbon dioxide (C02) to extinguish flames.
PROTECTION OF FIRE FIGHTERS:
Fire Fighting Instructions: This material will burn although it is not easily ignited. For fires involving this material,
do not enter any enclosed or confined fire space without proper protective equipment, including self-contained
breathing apparatus.
Combustion Products: Highly dependent on combustion conditions. A complex mixture of airborne solids, liquids,
and gases including carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and unidentified organic compounds will be evolved when
this material undergoes combustion. _
| SECTION 8 ACCIDENTAL RELEASE MEASURES
Protective Measures: Eliminate all sources of ignition in vicinity of spilled material.
Spill Management: Stop the source of the release if you can do it without risk. Contain release to prevent further
contamination of soil, surface water or groundwater. Clean up spilt as soon as possible, observing precautions in
Exposure Controls/Personal Protection. Use appropriate techniques such as applying non-combustible absorbent
materials or pumping. Where feasible and appropriate, remove contaminated soil. Place contaminated materials In
disposable containers and dispose of in a manner consistent with applicable regulations.
Reporting: Report spills to local authorities and/or the U.S. Coast Guard's National Response Center at (800)
424-8802 as appropnate or required.
: SECTION 7 HANDLING AND STORAGE j
i
Precautionary Measures: Keep out of the reach of children.
General Handling Information: Avoid contaminating soil or releasing this material into sewage and drainage .
systems and bodies of water.
Static Hazard: Electrostatic charge may accumulate and create a hazardous condition when handling this material.
To minimize this hazard, bonding and grounding may be necessary but may not, by themselves, be sufficient.
Review all operations which have the potential of generating and accumulating an electrostatic charge and/or a
flammable atmosphere (including tank and container filling, splash filling, tank cleaning, sampling, gauging, switch
loading, filtering, mixing, agitation, and vacuum truck operations) and use appropriate mitigating procedures. For
more information, refer to OSHA Standard 29 CFR 1910.106, 'Flammable and Combustible Liquids', National Fire
Protection Association (NFPA 77, 'Recommended Practice on Static Electricity', and/or the American Petroleum
Institute (API) Recommended Practice 2003, 'Protection Against Ignitions Arising Out of Static, Lightning, and
Stray Currents'.
Container Warnings: Container is not designed to contain pressure. Do not use pressure to empty container or it
may rupture with explosive force. Empty containers retain product residue (solid, liquid, and/or vapor) and can be
dangerous. Do not pressurize, cut, weld, braze, solder, drill, grind, or expose such containers to heat, flame,
2 of 6
4/19/9(11 n 1-40 PW
-------
MSDS https://cglapps.chevron.com/msdspds/MSDSDetailPage.aspx7docData...
sparks, static electricity, or other sources of ignition. They may explode and cause injury or death. Empty
containers should be completely drained, properly closed, and promptly returned to a drum reconditioner or
ji?PP-S6d_ofp_rof3erly.
SECTION 8 EXPOSURE CONTROLS/PERSONAL PROTECTION
GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS:
Consider the potential hazards of this material (see Section 3), applicable exposure limits, job activities, and other
substances in the work place when designing engineering controls and selecting personal protective equipment. If
engineering controls or work practices are not adequate to prevent exposure to harmful levels of this material, the
personal protective equipment listed below is recommended. The user should read and understand all instructions
and limitations supplied with the equipment since protection is usually provided for a limited time or under certain
circumstances.
ENGINEERING CONTROLS:
Use in a well-ventilated area.
PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT
Eye/Face Protection: No special eye protection is normally required. Where splashing is possible, wear safety
glasses with side shields as a good safety practice.
Skin Protection: No special protective clothing is normally required. Where splashing is possible, select protective
clothing depending on operations conducted, physical requirements and other substances in the workplace.
Suggested materials for protective gloves include: Nitrile Rubber, Viton, Silver Shield, 4H (PE/EVAL).
Respiratory Protection: No respiratory protection is normally required.
If user ope rattans generate an oil mist, determine if airborne concentrations are below the occupational exposure
limit for mineral oil mist. If not, wear an approved respirator that provides adequate protection from the measured
concentrations of this material. For air-purifying respirators use a particulate cartridge.
Use a positive pressure air-supplying respirator in circumstances where air-purifying respirators may not provide
adequate protection.
Occupational Exposure Limits:
Component ! Agency j
TWA |
STEL
Ceiling
Notation
Highly refined mineral oil (C15 - C50) ACGIH
5 mg/m3 !
10 mg/m3
--
-
Highly refined mineral oil (C15 - C50) ; OSHA 2-1
5 mg/m3
-
- i
-
SECTION 9 PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
Attention: the data below are typical values and do not constitute a specification.
Color: Light to Brown
Physical State: Liquid
Odor: Petroleum odor
pH: Not Applicable
Vapor Pressure: <0.01 mmHg @ 37.8 °C (100 °F)
Vapor Density (Air = 1): >1
Boiling Point: >315°C (599°F)
Solubility: Soluble in hydrocarbons; insoluble in water
Freezing Point: Not Applicable
Melting Point: Not Applicable -
Viscosity: 15 cSt: #jgpJg_(212^F) (Min)
SECTION 10 STABILITY AND REACTIVITY
Chemical Stability: This material is considered stable under normal ambient and anticipated storage and handling
conditions of temperature and pressure.
Incompatibility With Other Materials: May react with strong acids or strong oxidizing agents, such as chlorates,
nitrates, peroxides, etc.
4/12/2010 .1:49 PM
-------
MSDS https://cglapps.chevron.com/msdspds/MSDSDetai1Page.aspx7docData...
Hazardous Decomposition Products: None known (None expected)
Hazardous Polymerization: Hazardous polymerization will not occur.
! SECTION 11 TOXICOLOGICAL INFORMATION
IMMEDIATE HEALTH EFFECJS
Eye Irritation: The eye irritation hazard is based on evaluation of data for similar materials or product components.
Skin Irritation: The skin irritation hazard is based on evaluation of data for similar materials or product
components.
Skin Sensitization: The skin sensitization hazard is based on evaluation of data for similar materials or product
components.
Acute Dermal Toxicity: The acute dermal toxicity hazard is based on evaluation of data for similar materials or
product components.
Acute Oral Toxicity: The acute oral toxicity hazard is based on evaluation of data for similar materials or product -
components.
Acute Inhalation Toxicity: The acute inhalation toxicity hazard is based on evaluation of data for similar materials
or product components.
ADDITIONAL TOXICOLOGY INFORMATION:
This product contains petroleum base oils which may be refined by various processes including severe solvent
extraction, severe hydrocracking, or severe hydrotreating. None of the oils requires a cancer warning under the
OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200). These oils have not been listed in the National
Toxicology Program (NTP) Annual Report nor have they been classified by the International Agency for Research
on Cancer (IARC) as; carcinogenic to humans (Group 1), probably carcinogenic to humans (Group 2A), or possibly
carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B). These oils have not been classified by the American Conference of
Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) as: confirmed human carcinogen (A1), suspected human carcinogen
(A2), or confirmed animal carcinogen with unknown relevance to humans (A3). During use in engines, contamination
of oil with low levels of cancer-causing combustion products occurs. Used motor oils have been shown to cause
skin cancer in mice following repeated application and continuous exposure. Brief or intermittent skin contact with
used motor oil is not expected to have serious effects in humans if the oil is thoroughly removed by washing with
soap and water.
SECTION 12 ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION
ECOTOXICITY
This material is not expected to be harmful to aquatic organisms. The ecotoxicity hazard is based on an evaluation
of data for the components or a similar material.
ENVIRONMENTAL FATE
Ready Biodegradability: This material is not expected to be readily biodegradable. The biodegradability of this
material is based on an evaluation of data for the components or a similar material.
SECTION 13 DISPOSAL CONSIDERATIONS
Use material for its intended purpose or recycle if possible. Oil collection services are available for used oil
recycling or disposal. Place contaminated materials in containers and dispose of in a manner consistent with
applicable regulations, Contact your sales representative or bcal environmental or health authorities for approved
disposal or recycling methods.
SECTION 14 TRANSPORT INFORMATION
The description shown may not apply to all shipping situations. Consult 49CFR, or appropriate Dangerous Goods
Regulations, for additional description requirements (e.g., technical name) and mode-specific or quantity-specific
A /if f*
4/12/2010 3:49 PI
-------
tfSDS
shipping requirements.
https://cg!apps.chevroiLcom/'msdspds/MSDSDetailPage.aspx?docData..,
DOT Shipping Description: PETROLEUM LUBRICATING OIL, NOT REGULATED AS A HAZARDOUS
MATERIAL FOR TRANSPORTATION UNDER 49 CFR
Additional lnformation:NOT HAZARDOUS BY U.S. DOT. ADR/RID HAZARD CLASS NOT APPLICABLE.
IMO/IMDG Shipping Description: PETROLEUM LUBRICATING OIL; NOT REGULATED AS DANGEROUS
GOODS FOR TRANSPORT UNDER THE IMDG CODE
ICAO/IATA Shipping Description: PETROLEUM LUBRICATING OIL; NOT REGULATED AS DANGEROUS
GOODS FOR TRANSPORT UNDER ICAO Tl OR iATA DGR
SECTION 15 REGULATORY INFORMATION
EPCRA 311/312 CATEGORIES: 1. Immediate (Acute) Health Effects: NO
2. Delayed (Chronic) Health Effects: NO
3. Fire Hazard: NO
4. Sudden Release of Pressure Hazard: NO
5. Reactivity Hazard: NO
REGULATORY LISTS SEARCHED:
01-1 =IARC Group 1 03=EPCRA313
01-2A=IARC Group 2A 04=CA Proposition 65
01-2B=IARC Group 2B 05=MA RTK
02=NTP Carcinogen 06=NJ RTK
07=PA RTK
The following components of this material are found on the regulatory lists indicated.
Zinc alky! dithiophosphate 03, 06
CHEMICAL INVENTORIES:
All components comply with the following chemical inventory requirements: TSCA (United States).
One or more components has been notified but may not be listed in the following chemical inventories: DSL
(Canada). Secondary notification by the importer may be required.
One or more components does not comply with the following chemical inventory requirements: AICS (Australia),
EINECS (European Union), ENCS (Japan), IECSC (China), KECI (Korea), PICCS (Philippines).
NEW JERSEY RTK CLASSIFICATION:
Under the New Jersey Right-to-Know Act L. 1983 Chapter 315 N.J.S.A. 34:5A-1 et. seq., the product is to be
identified as follows: PETROLEUM OIL (Motor oil)
WHMIS CLASSIFICATION:
This product is not considered a controlled product according to the criteria of the Canadian Controlled Products
Regulations.
SECTION 16 OTHER INFORMATION
NFPA RATINGS: Health: 0 Flammability: 1 Reactivity: 0
HMIS RATINGS: Health: 1 Flammability: 1 Reactivity: 0
(0-Least, 1-Slight, 2-Moderate, 3-High, 4-Extreme, PPE:- Personal Protection Equipment Index recommendation,
*- Chronic Effect Indicator). These values are obtained using the guidelines or published evaluations prepared by
the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) or the National Paint and Coating Association (for HMIS ratings).
i of 6
4/12/2010 3:49 PM
-------
maud https://cglapps.chevron.com/msdspds/MSDSDetailPage.aspx7docData
LABEL RECOMMENDATION:
Label Category : ENGINE OIL 1 - ENG1
REVISION STATEMENT: This is a new Material Safety Data Sheet.
Revision Date: February 14, 2008
ABBREVIATIONS THAT MAY HAVE BEEN USED IN THIS DOCUMENT:
TLV - Threshold Limit Value
TWA - Time Weighted Average
J
STEL - Short-term Exposure Limit ;
PEL - Permissible Ejqjosure Limit
CAS - Chemical Abstract Service N umber
ACGIH - American Conference of Government Industrial:
Hygienlsts
IMO/IMDG - International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code
API - American Petroleum Institute
MSDS - Material Safety Data Sheet 1
CVX - Chevron !
NFPA - National Rre Protection Association (USA)
DOT - Department of Transportation (USA)
NTP - National Toxicology Program (USA) j
IARC - International Agency for Research on Cancer
OSHA - Occupational Safety and Health Administration
Prepared according to the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200) and the ANSI {
MSDS Standard (Z400.1) by the Chevron Energy Technology Company, 100 Chevron Way, Richmond,
California 94802.
.... ,, , r. . _. '
: The above information is based on the data of which we are aware and is believed to be correct as j
; of the date hereof. Since this information may be applied under conditions beyond our control and j
| with which we may be unfamiliar and since data made available subsequent to the date hereof may I
i suggest modifications of the information, we do not assume any responsibility for the results of its ;
: use. This information is furnished upon condition that the person receiving it shall make his own j
determination of the suitability of the material for his particular purpose.
6 of 6
4/12/2010 3:49 PM
-------
SAFETY DATA SHEET
EACO CHEM, INC.
Issue Date: 08/25/16 Revision Date:
1. IDENTIFICATION OF THE SUBSTANCE/PREPARATION AND OF THE
COMPANY/UNDERTAKING
Product Name
Recommended Use of the Mixture and Restrictions On Use:
Restricted To: For Professional Use Only
Uses Advised Against: Not Recommended for Household Use.
Details of the Supplier of the Safety Data Sheet
Manufacturers Address:
EaCo Chem, Inc.
765 Commerce Avenue
New Castle, PA 16101
724-656-1055
Emergency telephone number:
8:00 AM to 5:00 PM EST Monday-Friday 1-800-313-8505
Non-Business Hours (CHEM-TEL) 1-800-255-3924
2. HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION
2.1 Classification of Mixture
GHS Classification HCS 2012 (29 CFR1910)
Hazard Class
Category
Hazard Statements
Precautionary Statements
Skin Corrosion / Irritation
Category 2
H315
P264.P280.P270
P303+P362+P352, P363. P314
Eye Damage / Irritation
Category 2
H319
P280, P305+P352+P338, P315
2.2 Label Elements HCS 2012 (29 CFR 1910)
PICTOGRAMS
Signal Word: WARNING
Product Name: SABRE RTU Page: 1 of 7 Issued: 08/25/16 Version: 1
-------
Hazard Statements:
Hazard #'
Hazard Statement
H315
Causes skin irritation
H319
Causes serious eye irritation
Precautionary Statements:
Precautionary #
Precautionary Statement
P202
Do not handle until all safety precautions have been read arid understood.
P273
Avoid release to the environment.
P501
Dispose of contents/container according to federal, state & local regulations.
P264
Wash skin thoroughly after handling.
P270
Do not eat, drink or smoke when using this product.
P280
Wear protective gloves/protective clothing/eye protection/face protection.
P303+P362+P352
IF ON SKIN (or hair):Take off contaminated clothing. Wash with plenty of water/...
P305+P352+P338
IF IN EYES: Wash with plenty of water/Remove contact lenses, if present and easy to
do. Continue rinsing.
P314
Get medical advice/attention if you feel unwelL
P315
Get immediate medical advice/attention.
P363
Wash contaminated clothing before reuse.
2.3 Hazards Not Otherwise Classified (HNOC):
Other Information
3. COMPOSITION/INFORMATION ON MIXTURES
Hazardous Components
Chemical name
CAS number
it/
/O
Trade secret
Hydrochloric Acid
7647-01-0
3-8
Balance
Trade secret
Balance
*
* The exact percentage (concentration) of composition has been withheld as a trade
secret.
4. FIRST AID MEASURES
4.1 Description of First Aid Measures
General advice
Consult a physician. Show this safety data sheet to the doctor in attendance.
Remove contaminated clothing.
If inhaled
If breathed in, move person to fresh air. If irritation persists, call a physician. If not
breathing, give artificial respiration.
In case of skin contact
Take off contaminated clothing and shoes immediately. Wash off with soap and
/ plenty of water. Wash clothes before reuse. If irritation persists, call a physician.
Product Name: SABRE RTU
Page: 2 of 7 Issued: 08/25/16
Version: 1
-------
In case of eye contact
Rinse thoroughly with plenty of water for at least 15 minutes. Consult a physician
immediately.
If swallowed
Do NOT induce vomiting. Rinse mouth with water. Never give anything by mouth to
an unconscious person. Consult a physician immediately.
4.2 Most important symptoms and effects, both acute and delayed:
The most important known symptoms and effects are described in the labeling (see
section 2.2) and/or in section 11
4.3 Indication of any immediate medical attention and special treatment needed:
No data available.
5. FIRE-FIGHTING MEASURES
5.1 Extinguishing media:
Use any means suitable for extinguishing surrounding fire.
5.2 Special hazards arising from the substance or mixture:
Not considered to be a fire or explosion hazard.
5.3 Advice for firefighters:
Use protective clothing and NIOSH-approved breathing equipment appropriate for the
surrounding fire if needed.
5.4 Further information:
No data available
6. ACCIDENTAL RELEASE MEASURES
6.1 Personal precautions, protective equipment and emergency procedures:
Isolate the area and contain the spilled material. Persons not wearing the appropriate
PPE should be removed from the area until the spill is cleaned up. Stop leak if you can
do it without risk and avoid run off to waterways and sewers.
6.2 Environmental precautions:
Do not let product enter waterways and sewers.
6.3 Methods and materials for containment and cleaning up:
Soak up with inert absorbent material and prepare for disposal.
Keep in suitable, closed containers for disposal.
6.4 Reference to other sections:
For disposal see section 13.
Product Name: SABRE RTU
Page: 3 of 7 Issued: 08/25/16
Version: 1
-------
7. HANDLING AND STORAGE
7.1 Precautions for safe handling:
Wear all appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). Vapors may accumulate in
confined or poorly ventilated areas so ensure adequate ventilation at all times. If
ventilation is not possible wear respiratory protection. Use the product in a manner which
minimizes splashes. Keep container closed when not in use.
7.2 Conditions for safe storage, including any Incompatibilities:
Keep container tightly closed in a dry and well-ventilated place. Containers which are
opened must be carefully resealed and kept upright to prevent leakage.
7.3 Regulatory Requirements: No data found
8. EXPOSURE CONTROL/PERSONAL PROTECTION
Engineering controls: Avoid contact with skin, eyes and clothing. Wash hands before
breaks and immediately after handling the product. Ensure that eyewash stations and
safety showers are close to the workstation location.
Ventilation Control: Provide adequate ventilation to control airborne concentration. In
case of insufficient ventilation, wear suitable respiratory equipment.
Administrative controls: Educate and train employees in safe use of this product.
Follow all label warnings and data sheet instructions.
Personal Protection: As prescribed in the OSHA Standard for Personal Protective
Equipment (29 CFR 1910.132), employers must perform a hazard assessment of all
workplaces to determine the need for proper protective equipment for each employee.
Eye Protection: Close fitting safety goggles. Face Protection shield if needed.
Skin and Body Protection: Wear protective gloves and protective clothing.
Respiratory Protection: If irritation is experienced, NIOSH/MSHA approved respiratory
protection should be worn.
Contaminated Equipment: Prevent further leakage or spillage if safe to do so. Do not
let product enter waterways and sewers. Discharge into the environment must be
avoided. Dispose of the waste in compliance with federal, state, regional and local
regulations.
Product Name: SABRE RTU
Page: 4 of 7
Issued: 08/25/16
Version: 1
-------
9. PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
9.1 Information on basic physical and chemical properties
a) Appearance Form: liquid, pale color
b) Odor: Fresh Scent
c) Odor Threshold: Not Determined.
d) pH: > 1.0
e) Melting point/freezing point: No data available
f) Initial boiling point and boiling range: > 100 °C (> 212 °F) - lit.
g) Flash point: No data available
h) Evaporation rate: No data available
i) Flammability (solid, gas): Not applicable
j) Upper/lower flammability or explosive limits: No data available
k) Vapor pressure: No data available
I) Vapor density: No data available
m) Relative density: 1.08 g/cm3 at 25 °C (77 °F)
n) Water solubility: Fully Miscible
o) Auto-Ignition temperature: No data available
p) Decomposition temperature: No data available
q) Viscosity: Water thin
r) Explosive properties: Product does not present an explosion hazard
s) Oxidizing properties: No data available
10. STABILITY AND REACTIVITY
10.1 Reactivity: No data available
10.2 Chemical stability: Stable under recommended storage conditions.
10.3 Possibility of hazardous reactions: No data available
10.4 Conditions to avoid: High heat
10.5 Incompatible materials: Strong alkali and oxidizing compounds
10.6 Hazardous decomposition products: No data available
10.7 Other decomposition products: No data available
10.8 Other Information: In the event of fire: See section 5
11. TOXICOLOGICAL INFORMATION
11.1 Information on toxicological effects
Product Information:
Inhalation: May be harmful If inhaled
Ingestion: Harmful if swallowed
Eyes: Causes irritation and possible damage if left untreated.
Skin: Causes irritation with prolonged contact.
Germ cell mutagenicity: No data available
Carcinogenicity: This product does not contain any carcinogens or potential
carcinogens as listed by OSHA, IARC or NTP.
Reproductive toxicity: No data available
Specific target organ toxicity - single exposure: No data available
Specific target organ toxicity - repeated exposure: No data available
Product Name: SABRE RTU
Page: 5 of 7 Issued: 08/25/16
Version
-------
Aspiration hazard: No data available
Additional Information: No data available
12. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION
12.1 Toxicity: No data available
12.2 Persistence and Degradablllty: No data available
12.3 Bioaccumulative Potential: No data available
12.4 Mobility in Soil: No data available
12.5 Other Adverse Ecological Effects: Ah environmental hazard cannot be excluded
in the event of unprofessional handling or disposal.
13. DISPOSAL CONSIDERATIONS
Waste Treatment Method: If possible, recover product for intended use.
Waste must be disposed of in accordance with federal, state and local environmental
control regulations.
Empty Container Precautions: No data available.
Contaminated packaging: Dispose of as unused product.
14. TRANSPORT INFORMATION
DOT Classification: Not regulated by the DOT.
DOT Information: No data available.
Important Note: Shipping descriptions may vary based on mode of transport, quantities,
package size, and/or origin and destination. Consult your company's Hazardous
Materials/Dangerous Goods expert for information specific to your situation.
15. REGULATORY INFORMATION
This listing is to highlight federal level regulations of the product. Individual states, and
other nations may have further regulations not listed below.
Classification of Mixture:
US Federal Regulations:
SARA 313: Section 313 of Title III of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization
Act of 1986 (SARA). This product contains a chemical or chemicals which are subject to
the reporting requirements of the Act and Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations,
Part 372.
I Chemical Name |
CAS NO
Hydrochloric Acid
7647-01-0
Product Name: SABRE RTU
Page: 6 of 7
Issued: 08/25/16
Version: 1
-------
SARA 311/312 Hazard Categories:
Acute Health Hazard
Yes
Chronic Health Hazard
No
Fire Hazard
No
Sudden Release of Pressure Hazard
No
Reactive Hazard
No
California Proposition 65: This product does not contain any chemicals known to the
State of California to cause cancer, birth defects, or any other reproductive harm.
US State Rlght-to-Know Regulations:
I Chemical Name
PA MA NJ
Hydrochloric Acid
X X X
16. OTHER INFORMATION
HMIS® Hazard Ratings:
HEALTH
1
FIRE
0
REACTIVITY
1
PERSONAL PROTECTION
B*
4 = EXTREME / 3 = HIGH / 2 = MODERATE / 1 = SLIGHT / 0 = INSIGNIFICANT
*B: Chemical resistant gloves and goggles.
Disclaimer: The information herein is given in good faith, but no warranty, either
expressed or implied is made. Final determination of the suitability of any material is the
sole responsibility of the user. All materials may present unknown hazards and should
be used with caution. Although certain hazards are described herein we cannot be sure
or guarantee these are the only hazards which exist.
END OF SDS
Product Name: SABRE RTU
Page: 7 of 7 Issued: 08/25/16
Version: 1
-------
Diesel Exhaust Fluid
HCFlndUStrieS'Safety Data Sheet
According To Federal Register / VoL 77, No. 58 / Monday, March 26,2012 / Rules And Regulations
Revision Date: 1 September 2015 Dale of lisue:! September 2015 Supersedes Dale: 15 May 2015 Version: 1.1
SECTION 1: IDENTIFICATION
1.1. Product Identifier
Product Form: Mixture
Product Name: Diesel Exhaust Fluid
STCC:2818142
1.2. Intended Use of the Product
Diesel Exhaust NOx Reducing Agent
1.3. Name, Address, and Telephone of the Responsible Party
Company
CF Industries Sales, LLC
4 Parkway North, Suite 400
Deerfietd, Illinois 60015-2590
847-405-2400
www.cflndustries.com
1.4. Emergency Telephone Number
Emergency Number : 800-424-9300
For Chemical Emergency, Spill, Leak, Fire, Exposure, or Accident, call CHEMTREC - Day or Night
SECTION 2: HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION
2.1. Classification of the Substance or Mixture
Classification (GHS-US)
Not classified
2.2. Label Elements
GHS-US Labeling No labeling applicable
2.3. Other Hazards
Exposure may aggravate those with pre-existing eye, skin, or respiratory conditions.
2.4. Unknown Acute Toxicity (GHS-US) No data available
SECTION 3: COMPOSITION/INFORMATION ON INGREDIENTS
3.1. Substances
Not applicable
3.2. Mixture
Name
Product Identifier
% (w/w)
Classification (GHS-US)
Water
(CAS No) 7732-18-5
67.5
Not classified
Urea
{CAS No) 57-13-6
32.5
Not classified
SECTION 4: FIRST AID MEASURES
4.1. Description of First Aid Measures
General: Never give anything by mouth to an unconscious person. If you feel unwell, seek medical advice (show the label where
possible).
Inhalation: When symptoms occur: go into open air and ventilate suspected area. Obtain medical attention If breathing difficulty
persists.
Skin Contact: Remove contaminated clothing. Drench affected area with water for at least 15 minutes. Obtain medical attention if
irritation develops or persists.
Eye Contact: Rinse cautiously with water for several minutes. Remove contact lenses, if present and easy to do. Continue rinsing.
Obtain medical attention if pain, blinking or redness develops or persists.
Ingestion: Rinse mouth. Do NOT induce vomiting. Obtain medical attention.
4.2. Most Important Symptoms and Effects Both Acute and Delayed
General: Not expected to present a significant hazard under anticipated conditions of normal use.
Inhalation: Prolonged exposure to liquid may cause a mild irritation.
Skin Contact: May cause mild skin irritation.
1 September 2015
EN lEngltsh US)
1/6
-------
Diesel Exhaust Fluid
Safety Data Sheet
According To Federal Register / Vol. 77. No. SB / Monday, March 26,2012 / Rules And Regulations
Eye Contact: Prolonged exposure to liquid may cause a mild irritation.
Ingestion: Ingestion is likely to be harmful or have adverse effects.
Chronic Symptoms: Not available
4.3. Indication of Any Immediate Medical Attention and Special Treatment Needed
If exposed or concerned, get medical advice and attention.
SECTION 5: FIRE-FIGHTING MEASURES
5.1. Extinguishing Media
Suitable Extinguishing Media: Use extinguishing media appropriate for surrounding fire.
Unsuitable Extinguishing Media: Do not use a heavy water stream. Use of heavy stream of water may spread fire.
5.2. Special Hazards Arising From the Substance or Mixture
Fire Hazard: Not considered flammable but may burn at high temperatures.
Explosion Hazard: Product Is not explosive.
Reactivity; Hazardous reactions will not occur under normal conditions.
5.3. Advice for Firefighters
Precautionary Measures Fire: Exercise caution when fighting any chemical fire.
Flrefightlng Instructions: Use water spray or fog for cooling exposed containers.
Protection During Fireflghting: Do not enter fire area without proper protective equipment, Including respiratory protection.
Hazardous Combustion Products: Oxides of Carbon, Nitrogen. Ammonia.
Reference to Other Sections
Refer to section 9 for flammabillty properties. ¦
SECTION 6: ACCIDENTAL RELEASE MEASURES
6.1. Personal Precautions, Protective Equipment and Emergency Procedures
General Measures: Avoid breathing (vapor, mist, spray). Avoid prolonged contact with eyes, skin and clothing.
6.1.1. For Non-Emergency Personnel
Protective Equipment: Use appropriate personal protection equipment (PPE).
Emergency Procedures: Evacuate unnecessary personnel.
6.1.2. For Emergency Personnel
Protective Equipment: Equip cleanup crew with proper protection.
Emergency Procedures: Stop leak if safe to do so. Ventilate area.
6.2. Environmental Precautions
Prevent entry to sewers and public waters. Contact competent authorities after a spill
6.3. Methods and Material for Containment and Cleaning Up
For Containment: Contain any spills with dikes or absorbents to prevent migration and entry into sewers or streams.
Methods for Cleaning Up: Clean up spills immediately and dispose of waste safely. Absorb and/or contain spill with inert material,
then place in suitable container.
6.4. Reference to Other Sections
See heading 8, Exposure Controls and Personal Protection.
SECTION 7: HANDLING AND STORAGE
7.1. Precautions for Safe Handling
Additional Hazards When Processed: When heated to decomposition, emits toxic fumes.
Hygiene Measures: Handle in accordance with good industrial hygiene and safety procedures. Wash hands and other exposed areas
with mild soap and water before eating, drinking, or smoking and again when leaving work.
7.2. Conditions for Safe Storage, Including Any Incompatibilities
Technical Measures: Comply with applicable regulations.
Storage Conditions: Store In a dry, cool, and well-ventilated place. Keep container closed when not In use. Keep/Store away from
extremely high or low temperatures, incompatible materials.
Incompatible Materials: Strong acids. Strong bases. Strong oxidizers. Alkalis.
7.3. Specific End Use(s)
Diesel Exhaust NOx Reducing Agent.
1 September 2015
EN (English US)
-------
Diesel Exhaust Fluid
Safety Data Sheet
According To Federal Register/ Vol. 77. No. 58 / Monday, March 26, 2012 / Rules And Regulations
SECTION 8: EXPOSURE CONTROLS/PERSONAL PROTECTION
8.1. Control Parameters
No additional information available.
8.2. Exposure Controls
Appropriate Engineering Controls: Emergency eye wash fountains and safety showers should be available in the immediate vicinity
of any potential exposure. Ensure adequate ventilation, especially in confined areas. Ensure all national/local regulations are
observed.
Personal Protective Equipment: In case of splash hazard: safety glasses.
Materials for Protective Clothing: Not applicable.
Hand Protection: Wear chemically resistant protective gloves.
Eye Protection: In case of splash hazard: chemical goggles or safety glasses.
Skin and Body Protection: Wear suitable protective clothing.
Respiratory Protection: If exposure limits are exceeded or irritation is experienced, approved respiratory protection should be worn.
Other Information: When using, do not eat, drink, or smoke.
SECTION 9: PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
9.1. Information on Basic Physical and Chemical Properties
Physical State
Appearance
Odor
Odor Threshold
pH
Evaporation Rate
Melting Point
Freezing Point
Boiling Point
Flash Point
Auto-ignition Temperature
Decomposition Temperature
Flammabllity (solid, gas)
Lower Flammable Limit
Upper Flammable Limit
Vapor Pressure
Relative Vapor Density at 20 "C
Relative Density
Specific gravity / density
Specific Gravity
Solubility
Partition Coefficient: N-Octanol/Water
Viscosity
Explosion Data - Sensitivity to Mechanical Impact
Explosion Data - Sensitivity to Static Discharge
Liquid
Colorless, clear
Slight Ammonia
Not available
9.8 -10
Not available
Not available
-12 'C (11 °F)
104 "C (219 'F)
Not available
Not available i.
Not available
Not available
Not available
Not available
Not available
Not available
Not available
9.0909 lbs. / USG - 4.13 kg / 3.7B5L @20°C (68°F)
1.087-1.093 @20'C (68*F)
100%
Not available
Not available
Not expected to present an explosion hazard due to mechanical Impact.
Not expected to present an explosion hazard due to static discharge.
1 September 2015
EN (English US)
3/6
-------
Diesel Exhaust Fluid
Safety Data Sheet
According To Federal Register/ Vol. 77, No. 58/ Monday, March 26,2012 / Rules And Regulations
SECTION 10: STABILITY AND REACTIVITY
10.1. Reactivity: Hazardous reactions will not occur under normal conditions.
10.2. Chemical Stability: Stable under recommended handling and storage conditions (see section 7).
10.3. Possibility of Hazardous Reactions: Hazardous polymerization will not occur.
10.4. Conditions to Avoid: Extremely high or low temperatures. Incompatible materials.
10.5. Incompatible Materials; Strong acids. Strong bases. Strong oxidizers. Alkalis.
10.6. Hazardous Decomposition Products: Nitrogen oxides. Irritating fumes. Ammonia. Carbon oxides (CO, C02).
SECTION 11: TOXICOLOGICAL INFORMATION
11.1. Information on Toxlcologfcal Effects - Product
Acute Toxicity: Not classified
LD50 and LC50 Data: Not available
Skin Corrosion/Irritation: Not classified
pH: 9.8 -10
Serious Eye Damage/Irritation: Not classified
pH: 9.8 -10
Respiratory or Skin Sensitization: Not classified
Germ Cell Mutagenicity: Not classified
Teratogenicity: Not classified
Carcinogenicity: Not classified
Specific Target Organ Toxicity (Repeated Exposure): Not classified
Reproductive Toxicity: Not classified
Specific Target Organ Toxicity (Single Exposure): Not classified
Aspiration Hazard: Not classified
Symptoms/Injuries After Inhalation: Prolonged exposure to liquid may cause a mild irritation.
Symptoms/injuries After Skin Contact: May cause mild skin irritation.
Symptoms/injuries After Eye Contact: Prolonged exposure to liquid may cause a mild irritation.
Symptoms/Injuries After Ingestion: Ingestion is likely to be harmful or have adverse effects.
11.2. Information on Toxicological Effects - Ingredient(s)
LD50 and LC50 Data:
Water (7732-18-5)
LD50 Oral Rat
> 90000 mg/kg
Urea (57-13-6)
LDS0 Oral Rat
8471 mg/kg
SECTION 12: ECOLOGICAL l;NFORMATION
12.1. Toxicity No additional information available
Urea (57-13-6)
LC50 Fish 1
16200 -18300 mg/l (Exposure time: 96 h - Species: Poecllia reticulata)
EC50 Daphnia 1
3910 mg/l (Exposure time: 48 h - Species: Daphnia magna [Static])
12.2. Persistence and Degradability
Diesel Exhaust Fluid
Persistence and Degradability
Not established.
12.3. Bioaccumulative Potential
Diesel Exhaust Fluid
Bioaccumulative Potential
Not established.
Urea (57-13-6)
BCF Fish 1
<10
Log Pow
-1.59 (at 25 •C)
12.4. Mobility in Soil Not available
1 September 2015
EN (English US)
4/E
-------
Diesel Exhaust Fluid
Safety Data Sheet
According To Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 58 / Monday, March 26,2012/ Rules And Regulations
12.5. Other Adverse Effects
Other Information: Avoid release to the environment.
SECTION 13: DISPOSAL CONSIDERATIONS
13.1. Waste treatment methods
Waste Disposal Recommendations: Dispose of waste material in accordance with all local, regional, national, provincial, territorial
and international regulations.
SECTION 14: TRANSPORT INFORMATION
14.1. In Accordance with DOT
14.2. In Accordance with IMDG
14.3. In Accordance with IATA
14.4. In Accordance with TDG
Not regulated for transport
Not regulated for transport
Not regulated for transport
Not regulated for transport
SECTION 15: REGULATORY INFORMATION
15.1. US Federal Regulations
Water (7732-18-5)
Listed on the United StatesTSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) inventory
Urea (57-13-6)
Listed on the United States TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) Inventory
15.2. US State Regulations
Urea (57-13-6)
U.S. - Minnesota - Hazardous Substance List
U.S. - Texas - Effects Screening Levels - Long Term
U.S. - Texas - Effects Screening Levels - Short Term
15.3. Canadian Regulations
Diesel Exhaust Fluid
WHMIS Classification
Uncontrolled product according to WHMIS classification criteria
Water (7732-18-5)
Listed on the Canadian DSL (Domestic Substances List)
WHMIS Classification
Uncontrolled product according to WHMIS classification criteria
Urea (57-13-6)
Listed on the Canadian DSL (Domestic Substances List)
WHMIS Classification
Uncontrolled product according to WHMIS classification criteria
This product has been classified in accordance with the hazard criteria of the Controlled Products Regulations (CPR) and the SDS
contains all of the information required by CPR.
SECTION 16: OTHER INFORMATION, INCLUDING DATE OF PREPARATION OR LAST REVISION
Revision Date
Revision Comments
1 September 2015
Section 1.1 updated
NFPA Health Hazard
NFPA Fire Hazard
NFPA Reactivity
1 - Exposure could cause Irritation but only minor residual
injury even If no treatment Is given.
0 - Materials that will not bum.
0 - Normally stable, even under fire exposure conditions,
and are not reactive with water.
1 September 2015
EN (English US)
5/6
-------
Diesel Exhaust Fluid
Safety Data Sheet
According To Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 58 / Monday, March 26,2012 / Rules And Regulations
HMIS III Rating
Health
Flammabillty
Physical
1 Slight Hazard - Irritation or minor reversible injury possible
0 Minimal Hazard
0 Minimal Hazard
Party Responsible for the Preparation of This Document
CF Industries, Corporate EHS Department, 847-405-2400
This information is based on our current knowledge and is Intended to describe the product for the purposes of health, safety and
environmental requirements only. It should not therefore be construed as guaranteeing any specific property of the product.
CF believes the information contained herein is accurate; however; CF makes no guarantees or warranties with respect to such
accuracy and assumes no liability in connection with the use of the Information contained herein by any party. The provision of the
information contained herein,by CF is not Intended to be and should not be construed as legal advice or as ensuring compliance by
other parties. Judgments as to the suitability of the Information contained herein for the party's own use or purposes are solely the
responsibility of that party. Any party handling, transferring, transporting, storing, applying or otherwise using this product should
review thoroughly all applicable laws, rules, regulations, standards and good engineering practices. Such thorough review should
occur before the party handles, transfers, transports, stores, applies or otherwise uses this product.
(tort* America CHS US 2012 & WHMIS 2
1 September 2015 EN (English US) 6/6
-------
APPENDIX D
VAPOR INTRUSION EVALUATION - SITE-SPECIFIC ATTENUATION FACTORS
-------
IF Golder
Associates
CALCULATIONS
Date: 12/06/2017
Project No.: 165-2829
Site Name: LaBounty Landfill Site
12/06/2017
165-2829
Made by: KSG 11/21/2017
Checked by: MBS 11/21/2017
Reviewed by: GJG 11/22/2017
Subject SITE SPECIFIC VAPOR INTRUSION ATTENUATION FACTORS
1.0 OBJECTIVE
The United States Environmental Protection Agency's (USEPA) Fifth 5-Year Review Report (USEPA,
2015a) of the LaBounty Landfill Site (LaBounty Site), located on the west side of the Cedar River just
downstream of Charles City in Floyd County Iowa, recommended evaluation of potential vapor intrusion
pathways. Co-located sub-slab vapor and indoor air samples were collected in accordance with the USEPA
approved Work Plan Response to Fifth 5-Year Review (Golder, 2016a; Work Plan) and the USEPA
approved Vapor Intrusion Evaluation Work Plan Addendum (Work Plan Addendum; Golder 2016b) in
October 2016, March 2017 and June 2017. The objective of this calculation Ts to identify site-specific
attenuation factors using reported sub-slab vapor and indoor air concentrations of 1,1-dichloroethene and
to estimate the contribution of background sources to indoor air concentrations of benzene and
tetrachloroethene.
1,1-dichloroethene has been detected in both sub-slab vapor and indoor air at VI16-LSS/LIA-01 through
VI16-LSS/LIA-06 during nearly every sampling event. As no indoor air sources of 1,1-dichloroethene have
been identified, it can be conservatively assumed that indoor air levels of this constituent are primarily due
to sub-slab vapor. Co-located sub-slab vapor and indoor air 1,1-dichloroethene results were used to
calculate site-specific attenuation factors using the following equation (USEPA, 2015b):
The maximum calculated site-specific attenuation factor was used to conservatively predict the contribution
of sub-slab sources to indoor air for other constituents for which background sources are also present
(specifically benzene and tetrachloroethene at VI16-LIA-03 through VI16-LIA-06). The predicted indoor air
concentration from sub-slab sources is calculated as:
2.0 METHODOLOGY
c,
Where:
asite= Site-specific attenuation factor [unit-less]
Oa= Observed 1,1-dichloroethene indoor air concentration [ug/m3]
Css= Observed 1,1-dichloroethene sub-slab vapor concentration [ug/m3]
g:\projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\summary reports\labounty\revised\appendix d\app d - attenuation factors.12.6.2017.docx
Golder Associates Inc.
200 Century Parkway, Suite C
Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054 USA
Tel: (856)793-2005 Fax: (856)793-2006 www.golder.com
Golder Associates: Operations in Africa, Asia, Australasia, Europe, North America and South America
Golder, Golder Associates and the GA globe design are trademarks of Golder Associates Corporation
-------
CALCULATIONS
Page 2 of 2
Project No.:
165-2829
Made by:
KSG 11/21/17
Site Name:
LaBounty Landfill
Checked by:
MBS 11/21/17
Date:
11/21/2017
Reviewed by:
GJG 11/22/17
?1A ~ aMaxCsS
Where:
Pia= Predicted constituent indoor air concentration [ug/m3]
ccmsx = Maximum site-specific attenuation factor (0.01)
Css= Observed constituent sub-slab vapor concentration [ug/m3]
The method detection limit was conservatively used to predict indoor air concentrations (Pia) in instances
where sub-slab vapor constituents (Css) were not detected.
3.0 RESULTS
The calculated site-specific attenuation factors derived from observed concentrations of 1,1-dichloroethene
in sub-slab vapor and indoor air are presented in Table D-1. 'The average site-specific attenuation factor is
0.002 with values ranging from between 4x10"6 and 0.01 based on location and season. The predicted
indoor air concentrations of benzene and tetrachloroethene from the calculated maximum site-specific
attenuation factor (0.01) are presented in Tables D-2 and D-3 respectively. Predicted indoor air
concentrations of benzene and tetrachloroethene were multiple orders of magnitude below observed indoor
air concentrations and USEPA screening levels.
4.0 CONCLUSIONS
The maximum 1,1-dichloroethene attenuation factor (0.01) indicates greater attenuation than USEPA's
generic attenuation factor of 0.03, and is consistent with USEPA (2015b) which notes that attenuation is
typically greater than indicated by the generic value. All concentrations of benzene and tetrachloroethene
predicted using the maximum calculated site-specific attenuation factor were well below both observed
indoor air concentrations and USEPA screening levels. This indicates indoor background sources are likely
the reason for the observed exceedances of screening levels in indoor air.
5.0 REFERENCES
Golder 2016a. Work Plan Response to Third 5-Year Review, Shaw Avenue Dump Site, Charles City, Iowa.
August, 2016.
Golder 2016b. Sub-slab Vapor Sample Results from September 13, 2016 and Vapor Intrusion Evaluation
Work Plan Addendum. November 2, 2016.
USEPA 2015a. Fifth 5-Year Review Report for the LaBounty Site, Charles City, Floyd County, Iowa. July
22, 2015.
USEPA 2015b. OSWER Technical Guide for Assessing and Mitigating the Vapor Intrusion Pathway form
Subsurface Vapor Sources to Indoor Air. June 2015.
,:\projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\summary reports\labounty\revised\appendix d\app d - attenuation factors.12.6.2017.docx
_ Golder
Associates
-------
November 2017 Table D-l 165-2829
Site-Specific Attenuation Factors
LaBounty Landfill
Charles City, Iowa
Location ID1
Date
1,1-DCE Sub-slab Vapor
Result [|ig/m3]
1,1-DCE Indoor Air
Result big/m3]
Attenuation
Factor2
VI16-LSS/LIA-01
10/26/2016
26000
29
0.001
VI16-LSS/LIA-01
3/29/2017
12000
3.9
3.E-04
VI16-LSS/LIA-01
6/20/2017
17000
0.7 J
4.E-05
VI16-LSS/LIA-02
10/26/2016
9900
20
0.002
VI16-LSS/LIA-02
3/29/2017
NS
2.9
NA
VI16-LSS/LIA-02
6/20/2017
11000
0.77 J
7.E-05
VI16-LSS/LIA-03
10/26/2016
40000 J
11
3.E-04
VI16-LSS/LIA-03
3/29/2017
30000
29
0.001
VI16-LSS/LIA-03
6/20/2017
32000
6.3
2.E-04
VI16-LSS/LIA-04
10/26/2016
2000
10
0.005
VI16-LSS/LIA-04
3/29/2017
1700
24
0.01
VM6-LSS/LIA-04
6/20/2017
1800
5.9
0.003
, VI16-LSS/LIA-05
10/26/2016
43000
2.1
4.9.E-05
VI16-LSS/LIA-053
3/29/2017
37000
10
3.E-04
VI16-LSS/LIA-053
6/20/2017
33000
0.14 U
4.E-06
VI16-LSS/LIA-06
10/26/2016
3600
3.7
0.001
VI16-LSS/LIA-06
3/29/2017
4000
11
0.003
VI16-LSS/LIA-06
6/20/2017
1600
0.14 U
0.000
Average
0.002
Minimum
4.E-06
Maximum
0.01
Notes:
1) Sub-slab vapor and indoor air samples were co-located.
2) Attenuation factors were calculated with paired concentrations of 1,1-DCE in sub-slab vapor and indoor air.
Method detection limit was used in instances where constiuent was not detected. Values rounded to one
significant figure.
3) Results are maximum of parent/field duplicate set.
Abbreviations:
NS = not sampled
NA = not applicable
ng/m3 = micrograms per meter cubed
Qualifiers:
J = estimated result
U = non-detect; value refers to method detection limit.
Page 1 of 3
G:\PROJECTS\2016 Projects\1652829 - Zoetis Charles City\200 Reports\Summary Reports\LaBounty\Revised\Appendix DYTable D1-3.xlsx
Golder
'Associates
Prepared by: KSG 11/20/2017
Checked by: MSB 11/21/2017
Reviewed by: GJG 11/22/2017
-------
November 2017 Table D-2 165-2829
Predicted Indoor Air Concentrations of Benzene due to Sub-slab Vapor
LaBounty Landfill
Charles City, Iowa
Observed Benzene Sub-
Observed Benzene Indoor
Predicted Benzene Indoor
Location ID1
Date
slab Vapor Result [pg/m3]
Air Result [ng/m3] 2
Air Result [ng/m3]
VI16-LSS/LIA-03
10/26/2016
3.3 J
21
0.03
VI16-LSS/LIA-03
3/29/2017
30 U
18
0.30
VI16-LSS/LIA-03
6/20/2017
43 U
0.84
0.43
VI16-LSS/LIA-04
10/26/2016
2.4 U
17
0.02
VI16-LSS/LIA-04
3/29/2017
2 U
13
0.02
VI16-LSS/LIA-04
6/20/2017
4.5 J
0.8
0.05
VI16-LSS/LIA-05
10/26/2016
7.9 U
2
0.08
V116-LSS/LIA-053
3/29/2017
37 U
14
0.37
VI16-LSS/LIA-053
6/20/2017
36 U
0.14 J
0.36
V116-LSS/LI A-06
10/26/2016
3.9 J
3.7
0.04
V116-LSS/LI A-06
3/29/2017
4.1 U
6.4
0.04
V116-LSS/LI A-06
6/20/2017
53
0.35 J
0.53
Notes:
1) Sub-slab vapor and indoor air samples were co-located.
2) Results that exceed the benzene sub-slab vapor (533 MSJ/m3) and indoor air screening levels (16 M9'm3) are bolded.
3) Results are maximum of parent/field duplicate set.
Abbreviations:
NS = not sampled
NA = not applicable
pg/m3 = micrograms per meter cubed
Qualifiers:
J = estimated result
U = non-detect; value refers to method detection limit.
i,
r Golder
T Associates
Page 2 of 3 Prepared by: KSG 11/20/2017
Checked by: MSB 11/21/2017
Reviewed by: GJG 11/22/2017
G:\PROJECTS\2016 ProjectsM652829 - Zoetis Charles City\200 Reports\Summary Reports\LaBounty\Revised\Appendix D\Table D1-3.xlsx
-------
November 2017 Table D-3 165-2829
Predicted Indoor Air Concentrations of Tetrachloroethene due to Sub-slab Vapor
La Bounty Landfill
Charles City, Iowa
Location ID1
Date2
Observed PCE Sub-slab Vapor
Result [ng/m3]2
Observed PCE Indoor Air
Result [(ig/m3]2
Predicted PCE Indoor Air
Result [ng/m3]
VI16-LSS/LIA-03
10/26/2016
2000 J
150
20
VI16-LSS/LIA-03
3/29/2017
1900
2000
19
VI16-LSS/LIA-03
6/20/2017
1700
57
17
VI16-LSS/LIA-04
10/26/2016
430
120
4.3
VI16-LSS/LIA-04
3/29/2017
470
1500
4.7
VI16-LSS/LIA-04
6/20/2017
310
55
3.1
VI16-LSS/LIA-05
10/26/2016
4600
79
46
VI16-LSS/LIA-054
3/29/2017
8400 J
11000
84
VI16-LSS/LIA-054
6/20/2017
4400
3.7
44
• VI16-LSS/LIA-06
10/26/2016
590
170
5.9
VI16-LSS/LIA-06
3/29/2017
400
9700
4.0
VI16-LSS/LIA-06
6/20/2017
610
33
6.1
Notes:
1) Sub-slab vapor and indoor air samples were co-located.
2) Indoor air samples were collected on 10/25/2017.
3) Results that exceed the PCE sub-slab vapor (6000 |jg/m3) and indoor air screening levels (180 Mg/m3) are bolded.
4) Results are for field duplicates.
Abbreviations:
NS = not sampled
NA = not applicable
pg/m3 = micrograms per meter cubed
PCE = tetrachloroethene
Qualifiers:
J = estimated result
U = non-detect; value refers to method detection limit.
Page 3 of 3
G.\PROJECTS\2016 Projects\1652829 - Zoetis Chartes City\200 Reports\Summary Reports\laBounty\Revised\Appendix DVTable D1-3.xls*
(2^ Golfer
Associates
Prepared by: KSG 11/20/2017
Checked by: MSB 11/21/2017
Reviewed by: GJG 11/22/2017
-------
APPENDIX E
BUILDING INSPECTION FORM
-------
Building Inspection Survey
LaBounty Disposal Site
Charles City, IA
Preparer's name: Date:
Preparer's affiliation: ' Phone#:
Weather Conditions:
Part I - Occupants
Building Address:
Property Contact: Owner / Renter / other:
Contact's Phone: home ( ) work ( ) cell ( )
# of Building occupants: Children under age 13 Children age 13-18 Adults
Building Uses:
Part 11 - Building Characteristics
Building type: residential / multi-family residential / office / strip mall / commercial / industrial
Describe building: Year constructed:
Sensitive population: day care / nursing home / hospital / school / other (specify):
Number of floors below grade: (full basement / crawl space / slab on grade)
Number of floors at or above grade:
Basement floor construction: concrete / dirt / floating / stone / other (specify):
Visible signs of damage or cracking to basement floor: Yes / No
Foundation walls: poured concrete / cinder blocks / stone / other (specify)
Basement sump present? Yes / No Sump pump? Yes / No Water in sump? Yes / No
Type of heating system (circle all that apply):
hot air circulation hot air radiation wood steam radiation
heat pump hot water radiation kerosene heater electric baseboard
other (specify):
Type of ventilation system (circle all that apply):
central air conditioning mechanical fans bathroom ventilation fans individual
conditioning units fume hood fan outside air intake
other (specify):
Is there a whole building fan? Yes / No
Septic system? Yes / Yes (but not used) / No
Irrigation/private well? Yes / Yes (but not used) / No
1-1
-------
Type of ground cover outside of building: grass / concrete / asphalt / other (specify)
Existing subsurface depressurization (radon) system in place? Yes / No active /passive
Part III - General Observations
Provide any information that may be pertinent to the inspection event.
1-2
-------
At Golder Associates we strive to be the most respected global group of
companies specializing in ground engineering and environmental services.
Employee owned since our formation in 1960, we have created a unique
culture with pride in ownership, resulting in long-term organizational stability.
Golder professionals take the time to build an understanding of client needs
and of the specific environments in which they operate. We continue to expand
our technical capabilities and have experienced sleady growth with employees
now operating from offices located throughout Africa, Asia, Australasia.
Europe. North America and South America.
Africa * 27 11 254 4800
Asia + 852 2552 3658
Australasia +613 8862 3500
Europe +356 21 42 30 20
North America + 1 800 275 3281
South America + 55 21 3095 9500
solutions@golder.com
www.golder.com
Golder Associates Inc.
200 Century Parkway, Suite C
Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054 USA
Tel: (856)793-2005
Fax: (856)793-2006
r Golder
Associates
Golder. Golder Associates and the GA globe design are trademarks of Golder Associates Corporation
-------
_ Golder
Associates
August 24, 2016 Project No.: 165-6829
Ms. Elizabeth Hagenmaier
Remedial Project Manager
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Region 7
11201 Renner Boulevard
Lenexa, Kansas 66219
RE: RESPONSE TO USEPA COMMENTS ON WORK PLAN RESPONSE TO FIFTH 5-YEAR REVIEW
LABOUNTY LANDFILL SITE, CHARLES CITY, IOWA
Dear Ms. Hagenmaier:
On behalf of Zoetis LLC (Zoetis), Golder Associates Inc. (Golder) has prepared this response to the United
States Environmental Protection Agency's (USEPA) July 28, 2016 and August 5, 2016 electronic mail
messages (e-mails) that transmitted comments on the Work Plan Response to Fifth 5-Year Review (Work
Plan) for the LaBounty Landfill Site in Charles City, Iowa. Agency comments are presented below in
bold/italic font followed by Zoetis' responses in regular font. Zoetis' responses take into consideration our
phone conversation on August 16, 2016 and your follow-up August 17, 2016 e-mail. Proposed revisions to
the Work Plan are described, when necessary, in the Zoetis responses. Please note that, for ease of
review, certain comments have been rearranged and renumbered so as to match the order that the topics
occur in the Work Plan.
COMMENTS
Comment No. 1:
Throughout the document, sampling procedures are described, but specific SOPs are not
referenced. Please provide the SOP references or provide the SOPs as an attachment to the work
plan.
Response:
As agreed during the conference call on August 16, 2016, references to Golder's internal Standard
Operating Procedures (SOPs) for all sampling activities have been added to the Work Plan text.
Comment No. 2:
Section 2.1 and Table 2 and Figure 2. Table 2 shows the six primary sediment, surface water and
pore water locations in the Cedar River that will be analyzed, with an additional five sample locations
that will be archived or "held" for future analysis. Section 2.1 also states that the six primary
locations will be analyzed and the additional samples will be archived for possible later analysis.
Section 2.1 should describe the rationale that will be used to determine if the archived samples
need to be analyzed. Also, although it is stated in the text which samples are the primary locations,
it may be helpful to use different labeling in Figure 2 to identify the locations of the archived samples
on the river.
\\mtlaurel\data\proiects\2016 projectsM 652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\work plans\labounty\rtc rev final\final rtcjabounty (08242016).docx
Golder Associates Inc.
200 Century Parkway, Suite C
Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054 USA
Tel: (856)793-2005 Fax: (856)793-2006 www.golder.com
Golder Associates: Operations in Africa, Asia, Australasia, Europe, North America and South America
Golder, Golder Associates and the GA globe design are trademarks of Golder Associates Corporation
-------
Ms. Elizabeth Hagenmaier
USEPA
2
August 24, 2016
165-2829
Response:
As requested, additional rationale for the phased analysis of Cedar River samples has been added to
Section 2.1 of the Work Plan.
Comment No. 3:
Section 2.1, Page 4. It is not clear why CR16-L01, CR16-L02, CR16-L05, CR16-L06, CR16-L08 and
CR16-L10 are locations to be likely analyzed first.
As requested, additional rationale for the phased analysis of Cedar River samples has been added to
Section 2.1 of the Work Plan.
Comment No. 4:
Section 3.3, Page 8, Sub-slab Soil Gas, Bullet 1. An SOP for conducting the leak test should be
included in the report.
As noted in the response to Comment No. 1, references to Golder SOPs for all sampling activities have
been added to the Work Plan text, as appropriate, including the procedure for conducting a leak test.
Comment No. 5:
Sections 3.4 and 3.8, Pages 8 and 11. Section 3.4 lists the field observations for the Cedar River
sampling, and Section 3.8 details sub-slab soil gas sampling. We note that a handheld GPS-enabled
device is included with the sampling equipment listed in Section 3.3. In Sections 3.4 and 3.8, please
specify collection of the appropriate geospatial information (e.g., latitude and longitude) for each
Cedar River and sub-slab sampling location.
Sections 3.4 and 3.8 have been revised as appropriate to detail documentation of locations for each
collected sample.
Comment No. 6:
Section 3.8, Page 11, Paragraph 2. An SOP for installation of the sub-slab probes should be
included in the report.
As noted in the response to Comment No. 1, references to Golder internal SOPs for all sampling activities
have been added to the Work Plan text, as appropriate.
Response:
Response:
Response:
Response:
\Vntlaurel\data\projects\2016 projectsM652829 ¦ zoetis Charles cily\200 reports\work plans\labounty\rtc rev finaltfinal rtcjabounty (08242016).docx
af Golder
jr Associates
-------
Ms. Elizabeth Hagenmaier
USEPA
3
August 24, 2016
165-2829
Comment No. 7:
Section 5.1 Analytical Methods, Page 15. This section of a QAPP should identify the needed
laboratory turnaround time, especially if it is important to the project schedule.
Standard laboratory turnaround times have been added to Section 5.1 and are expected to be sufficient.
Comment No. 8:
Section 5.2.2. Typically EPA collects one field duplicate per 10 samples. We recommend this
approach.
As discussed and agreed in a conference call with USEPA on August 16, 2016, consistent with the current
monitoring program at the adjacent Shaw Site, and in part because the intent of the sampling described in
the Work Plan is largely confirmatory in nature, Zoetis will proceed with a field duplicate rate of 1 per 20
primary samples, as described in the Work Plan.
Comment No. 9:
Section 5.3 Instrument/Equipment Testing, Inspection, and Maintenance, Page 17. This section of
a QAPP should clearly identify the field instruments/equipment being used that require testing,
inspection, and maintenance.
Response:
Section 5.3 has been updated as requested.
Comment No. 10:
Section 5.5 Inspection/Acceptance of Supplies and Consumables, Page 18.
¦ Although an assumption can be made, it would be useful to note here who will be
responsible for inspection/acceptance of supplies and consumables.
¦ In addition to inspecting sampling equipment, will consumables like sample
containers also be inspected prior to use to ensure they are usable (e.g., proper
containers, no broken containers, no missing or ill-fitting lids, etc.)?
Response:
Section 5.5 has been updated as requested.
Comment No. 11:
Section 5.7 Data Management, Page 18.
¦ When addressing documentation and records, a QAPP should address the process
and responsibilities for ensuring that the most current approved version of the
QAPP is available.
Response:
Response:
\\mtlaurel\data\projects\2016 projectsM052829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\work plans\labounly\rtc rev finaltfnal rtcjabounty (08242016).docx
|P Golder
Associates
-------
Ms. Elizabeth Hagenmaier
USEPA
4
August 24, 2016
165-2829
¦ Section 1.0 Appendix B states the laboratory will keep laboratory records for five
years and identifies records to be maintained by Golder Associates. How long will
Golder Associates retain these records?
¦ If there are any standard forms or checklists that will be used (e.g., COC forms, field
sheets, etc.), they should be referenced here and examples attached if possible
¦ If there are any hardware or software requirements for the spreadsheet or database
program referenced here, they should be addressed in this section.
Response:
Sections 5.7 and 5.7.2 have been revised to provide the requested information.
Comment No. 12:
Section 6.1 Assessments and Response Actions, Page 20. This section refers to a Case Narrative
of the analytical report. It appears a separate field narrative report will not be prepared. Is this
correct?
Response:
This is correct. A separate field narrative report is not required for this project.
Comment No. 13:
Section 6.1, Page 20. It is not clear, what if any, field and/or laboratory audits or assessments are
planned for this project.
Response:
No formal project-specific field and/or laboratory audits are planned.
The laboratories selected for this project have Quality Assurance programs that include conducting regular
internal audits. The laboratories also undergo regular external audits as part of maintaining accreditation
through NELAC and other certifications.
Comment No. 14:
Section 7.2 Verification and Validation Methods, Page 24. How will the results of the data usability
review be shared with data users and if issues are discovered during this review, what is the
process and responsibilities for resolving them?
Response:
Section 7.2 has been revised to address this comment.
Comment No. 15:
Section 7.3 Reconciliation with User Requirements, Page 24. If there will be any statistical analyses
beyond calculating RPD, % recovery, and % completeness, it should be summarized in this section.
\Vntlaurel\data\projects\2016 projeds\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\work plans\labounty\rtc rev finalVinal rtcjabounty (08242016).docx
Golder
Associates
-------
Ms. Elizabeth Hagenmaier
USEPA
5
August 24, 2016
165-2829
Response:
The only statistical analyses associated with the data quality review are RPD, % recovery and %
completeness.
Comment No. 16:
Section 8.1, Page 25. Section 8.1 outlines how the collected data will be used to evaluate potential
human health and ecological risks. If the concentration of arsenic detected in any given sample
exceeds the screening levels, the archived samples will be analyzed. Then, the mean and 95% upper
confidence limit on the mean will be calculated for the full dataset to determine remedy
protectiveness. When evaluating potential human health risks, we are typically interested in the
average daily dose to which a receptor is exposed over the long-term. Generally, a mean, or an
upper-bound estimate on the mean, best represents that long-term average exposure. At the Cedar
River, it seems reasonable to assume that a child or adult would contact the entire exposure area,
rather than remain in a localized area. In contrast, when evaluating ecological risks, it is possible
that an ecosystem is localized where a given sediment and surface water sample will be collected.
Our recommendations are as follows. For human health concerns, we suggest describing use of
this portion of the Cedar River by recreational receptors, preferably with pictures. The goal would
be to persuade readers that people do not spend their entire exposure time near one sampling point,
but they are instead exposed to the entire stretch of river. For ecological concerns, however, each
sampling result will likely need to be compared to applicable screening levels to determine remedy
protectiveness.
Consistent with discussions during the August 16, 2016 conference call, pictures will be taken at each
sample location to document the surrounding landscape and any recreational use that is occurring nearby.
Information collected by interviewing the owner of the campground adjacent to the nearby Shaw Site may
also assist in documenting actual usage of the river.
Consistent with USEPA guidance, the goal of ecological risk management is to protect ecological
populations/communities, rather than individuals. Therefore, although a point-by-point comparison to
screening levels will be performed initially and presented in the summary report, if any exceedances are
reported, additional risk evaluation, including calculation of a 95% upper confidence limit (UCL), will be
completed to support the remedy protectiveness determination.
Comment No. 17:
Section 8.2.1, Page 26. Section 8.2.1 describes derivation of site-specific screening levels based
on human health risks. The levels were based on a target cancer risk of 5E-05 and a target non-
cancer hazard quotient of 0.5. The sediment and surface water samples will be analyzed for one
compound, arsenic, and the combined presence of arsenic at the proposed screening levels for
both media would result in a total hazard index of 1 and a total cancer risk of 1E-04. Although these
are acceptable targets, the values are unusual in that we often use target HQs of 0.1 or 1 and target
CRs of 1E-06 or 1E-05 for screening. However, the purpose of this sampling exercise is not to
conduct a baseline risk assessment, but to evaluate the protectiveness of the remedy as a follow-
up to the five-year review. Since the levels will not be used for screening purposes, but rather for
decision-making specific to this site, we suggest calling them site-specific risk-based
concentrations.
Response:
\\mtlaureMata\projects\2016 projectsM652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\work plans\labounty\rtc rev finalVinal rtcjabounty (082420l6).docx
Golder
Associates
-------
Ms. Elizabeth Hagenmaier
USEPA
6
August 24, 2016
165-2829
Response:
This comment is acknowledged and the terminology has been changed in the Work Plan as requested. As
discussed during the August 16, 2016 conference call, analytical results that are below the site-specific
risk-based concentrations can be used to determine that the remedy is protective; however, if certain
reported results exceed the site-specific risk-based concentrations, a more refined risk evaluation may be
performed to make a final protectiveness determination.
Comment No. 18:
Section 8.2.1. and Table 6. Section 8.2.1. states that the screening levels were selected to make a
protectiveness determination for the remedy, not for initial risk evaluation. There are two screening
values provided in Table 6 for sediment. The first value is based on a Dutch permissible
concentration in sediment of 5,900 mg/kg. The other value provided is based on the PEC from the
NOAA Squirt Tables of 33 mg/kg. These values are substantially different and the exact value that
is intended to be used is not specified in the text. Without site-specific toxicity data, the more
conservative PEC is recommended, as this value is based on a probable effect concentration. Lower
threshold effect concentrations are generally used for screening purposes.
USEPA's recommendation to use the more conservative PEC for screening is acknowledged. The PEC
from the NOAA Squirt Tables (33 mg/kg) will be used as an initial screening and if none of the results
exceed this value, it will be concluded that the remedy is protective of receptors associated with sediment
exposure. If select sample results indicate arsenic concentrations between the PEC and the Dutch
permissible concentration, both screening values will be considered and a final determination as to thev
application of the screening values will be made in the summary report.
Comment No. 19:
Section 8.2.2, Page 27. The most recent RSLs (May 2016) for a commercial/industrial setting are the
Composite Worker Air Table. Action levels for risk management decisions are based on either a
cancer risk level of 1E-05 or the non-cancer Hl=1 value, whichever is less. The values in Table 7 are
incorrect. As indicated, use the lesser of either the 1E-05 or Hl=1 and divide by the attenuation
factor of 0.03. In EPA Region 7, the TCE screening level under a commercial/industrial scenario is
6 ug/m3 rather than 8.8 ug/m3; divide 6.0 by 0.03 = 200 ug/m3. An additional example to determine
the correct screening level includes the following: the 1E-05 cancer risk value for benzene is 16
ug/m3, which is less than the non-cancer Hl=1 value of 130 ug/m3, divided by 0.03 = 533.33 ug/m3
rather than 520 ug/m3. Review and revise.
As discussed during the August 16, 2016 conference call, the sub-slab soil vapor screening levels in Table
7 were calculated using the USEPA Vapor Intrusion Screening Level Calculator (VISL Calculator Version
3.5.1) in accordance with the OSWER Technical Guide for Assessing and Mitigating the Vapor Intrusion
Pathway from Subsurface Vapor Sources to Indoor Air (USEPA VITG, June 2015). This approach produces
slightly different results than using the RSLs, likely due to differences in rounding. Nonetheless, consistent
with USEPA's August 17, 2016 e-mail, Table 7 and Section 8.2.2 have been revised based on the method
described in USEPA's comment and using the Region 7-preferred TCE screening value of 200 ug/m3for
initial screening, rather than the current RSL.
Response:
Response:
WntlaurelVjata\projects\2016 projeds\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\work plans\Jabounty\rtc rev finaltfinal rtcjabounty (08242016).docx
GiF Golder
X Associates
-------
Ms. Elizabeth Hagenmaier
USEPA
7
August 24, 2016
165-2829
Comment No. 20:
Section 9.0 Reporting, Page 28. Who will be responsible for preparing the summary report
described here and who will receive this report?
Section 9.0 has been revised to clarify that Golder will prepare the report on behalf of Zoetis and the report
will be submitted to the EPA.
Comment No. 21:
Table 2. Although an assumption can be made, the QAPP needs to clarify what would trigger the
samples with the "Hold" analysis timeframe to actually be analyzed.
Section 8.1 of the Work Plan describes the process for conducting the risk evaluation, including the scenario
that would trigger any held samples to be analyzed. A footnote has been added to Table 2 referencing this
process.
Comment No. 22:
Table 3 Sample Methods, Containers, Preservation, and Hold Times.
¦ The holding time for organic carbon is listed in this table is 28 days; however,
method 5310C gives a holding of seven days. This inconsistency needs to be
addressed.
¦ Will samples for dissolved parameters be field or laboratory filtered?
¦ The holding time of 28 days for organic carbon shown in Table 3 is consistent with the
requirements of method 5310C for water samples.
¦ . A note has been added to Table 3 indicating that samples for dissolved parameters will be
laboratory filtered.
Comment No. 23:
Appendix A, Figure 3. Indicate the size of each building for sub-slab sampling. Ensure an
appropriate number of samples are collected to adequately account for temporal and spatial
variability as well as internal partitions (i.e., footers), utility conduits, and slab integrity. Typically
EPA Region 7 recommends multi-point sub-slab samples per structure during 4 quarterly events to
account for these variables and to reduce uncertainty. Sub-slab concentrations beneath the central
portion of the structure are usually higher than concentrations closer to the perimeter of the
building.
Consistent with the OSWER Technical Guide for Assessing and Mitigating the Vapor Intrusion Pathway
from Subsurface Vapor Sources to Indoor Air (USEPA, June 2015), proposed locations were selected
Response:
Response:
Response:
Response:
\\mtlaurelViata\projects\2016 projeds\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\work plans\)abounty\ric rev finalVmal rlcjabounty (08242016).docx
liF Golder
^Associates
-------
Ms. Elizabeth Hagenmaier
USEPA
8
August 24, 2016
165-2829
based on the slab layouts and building uses to achieve a generally distributed coverage including multiple
points throughout each of the two buildings. Sample locations are in the approximate center of each
different portion of the building. Section 2.2 of the Work Plan has been revised to provide additional
rationale supporting the sample layout. As discussed and agreed upon during the conference call on
August 16, 2016, because the intent of the sampling program is to make a 5-year review protectiveness
determination, the sampling event proposed in the Work Plan will first be conducted and the results
evaluated to determine if additional sampling is necessary.
Comment No. 24:
Appendix B, Section 1.4 Chain of Custody Forms, Page B-3. Please note this section states that the
COC is initiated at the lab at sample container receipt; however, COC is actually initiated at sample
collection as described in Section 4.4.1 of Appendix B.
Response:
Section 1.4 of Appendix B has been revised to address this comment.
Comment No. 25:
Appendix C. Quality Assurance Project Plan Approval Sheet. If EPA approval is required, the final
QAPPwill need to be submitted to QA with the appropriate signatures from Zoetis LLC and Golder
Associates as well as yours as the Remedial Project Manager.
Response:
This comment is acknowledged.
Comment No. 26:
Table E-1. Table E-1 presents the surface water human health risk-based concentrations. Using
the site-specific exposure parameters listed, we were able to replicate the non-cancer values in the
EPA's Regional Screening Level Calculator (https://epa-prgs.ornl.gov/cgi-
bin/chemicals/csl_search). However, the calculator presented slightly different values from those
in Table E-1 for the age-adjusted surface water ingestion rate (1.178 L/kg vs. 1.23 Ukg) and the age-
adjusted dermal contact factor (287,920 cm2-event/kg vs. 294,280 cm2-event/kg). These differences
resulted in slightly higher surface water carcinogenic-based concentrations for the ingestion and
dermal lifetime exposure pathways. Please ensure the age-adjusted parameters and risk-based
concentrations were derived correctly, and revise Table E-1, as appropriate.
As requested in the USEPA August 17, 2016 e-mail, the values presented in Table E-1 have been revised
to correspond to those generated using USEPA's Regional Screening Level Calculator.
Comment No. 27:
Table E-2 and Table 6. Table E-2 presents the sediment human health risk-based concentrations.
Using the site-specific exposure parameters listed, we were able to replicate the non-cancer
calculations in the RSL Calculator. However, similar to the surface water calculations, we derived
slightly different values for the age-adjusted ingestion rate, dermal contact factor, and carcinogenic
risk-based concentrations. Please check these calculations, and revise Table E-2, as appropriate.
Response:
\VntlaurelWata\projects\2016 projectsM652829 - zoetis Charles cily\200 reports\worK plans\labounty\rtc rev finaltfinal rtcjabounty (O8242O10).docx
(F Golder
Associates
-------
Ms. Elizabeth Hagenmaier
USEPA
9
August 24, 2016
165-2829
More importantly, we note that the 47 mg/kg non-cancer risk-based concentration derived for a
younger child (HQ = 0.5) is the most protective value for human health exposure to sediment. This
value, rather than 201 mg/kg, should be listed in Table 6 as the human health risk-based
concentration for arsenic in sediment at the LaBounty site. Please revise Table 6.
As requested in the USEPA August 17, 2016 e-mail, the values presented in Table E-2 have been revised
to correspond to those generated using USEPA's Regional Screening Level Calculator. Table 6 has also
been revised to address the discrepancy noted in the comment.
Comment No. 28:
Table E-3 and Table 6. Table E-3 presents the human health risk-based concentrations for fish
tissue. Region 7 does not typically consider that inorganic arsenic significantly bioaccumulates in
fish tissue, particularly at concentrations that could pose a human health risk. However, we
recognize that the Iowa Water Quality Standard for Human Health is a water concentration based
on fish consumption. Thus, we have the following recommendations: 1) please note (perhaps in a
footnote to Table E-3) that fish ingestion rates markedly vary and a high degree of uncertainty is
present in the values that were selected, 2) please note that additional uncertainty surrounds use
of the 1 Ukg bioconcentration factor, and 3) please use the IWQS of 50 pg/L arsenic at the LaBounty
site, noting that this standard is protective of the site-specific incidental surface water ingestion as
calculated in Tables E-1 and E-3.
This comment is acknowledged and, as requested, a note has been added to Table E-3 regarding the
referenced uncertainties.
We trust that these responses are satisfactory, but please do not hesitate to contact us with any questions.
Very truly yours,
GOLDER ASSOCIATES INC.
Response:
Response:
/
/
Samantha Battle, PE
Sr. Project Environmental Engineer
Associate/Sr. Consultant
P. Steghen'Finn, C.Eng.
Sr. Practice/Program Leader
SLB/APJ/PSF:mtd
WmtlaurefcJata\projects\2016 projectsM052829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\work plans\labounty\rtc rev final\final rtcjabounty (08242016).doc*
W Golder
Associates
-------
WORK PLAN RESPONSE TO
FIFTH 5-YEAR REVIEW
LaBounty Landfill Site
Charles City, Iowa
Prepared For: Zoetis LLC
Prepared By: Golder Associates Inc.
200 Century Parkway, Suite C
Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054 USA
Distribution:
1 Copy USEPA
1 Copy Iowa Department of Natural Resources
1 e-Copy Zoetis LLC
1 e-Copy Quantum Management Group
1 Copy Golder Associates Inc.
August 2016
Project No. 165-2829
A world of
capabilities
delivered locally
Golder, Golder Associates and the GA globe design are trademarks of Golder Associates Corporation
_ Golder
Associates
-------
Table of Contents
August 2016 i 165-2829
Table of Contents
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Site Background 1
1.2 Project Organization 2
2.0 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED FIELD SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS 3
2.1 Cedar River :....3
2.2 Vapor Intrusion 5
3.0 SAMPLING PROCEDURES 8
3.1 General Procedures 8
3.2 T raining/Certification 8
3.3 Sampling Equipment 8
3.4 Field Observations for Cedar River Sampling 9
3.5 Surface Water Sample Collection 10
3.6 Pore Water Sample Collection 10
3.7 Sediment Sample Collection 11
3.7.1 Dredging Procedure ! 12
3.7.2 Core Tube Procedure 112
3.8 Sub-Slab Vapor Sample Collection 12
3.9 Investigation Derived Waste 13
4.0 DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES 14
5.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 16
5.1 Analytical Methods 16
5.2 Quality Control 17
5.2.1 Field Rinsate Blanks 17
5.2.2 Field Duplicates 17
5.2.3 MS/MSD 17
5.2.4 Quality Control-Requirements for Analysis 17
5.3 Instrument/Equipment Testing, Inspection, and Maintenance 18
5.4 Instrument/Equipment Calibration and Frequency 18
5.4.1 Field Calibration 18
5.4.2 Laboratory Calibration 19
5.5 Inspection/Acceptance of Supplies and Consumables 19
5.6 Data Acquisition Measurements (Non-Direct Measurements) 19
5.7 Data Management 19
5.7.1 Laboratory Data Deliverable Format 20
5.7.2 Laboratory Electronic Data Deliverable Format 20
6.0 ASSESSMENT/OVERSIGHT 21
6.1 Assessments and Response Actions 21
6.1.1 Corrective Action Procedures 21
6.2 Reports to Management 22
7.0 DATA VALIDATION/ USABILITY 23
7.1 Data Review, Verification, and Validation 23
7.2 Verification and Validation Methods 25
7.3 Reconciliation with User Requirements 25
8.0 RISK EVALUATION 27
8.1 Overview 27
8.2 Screening Levels and Site-Specific Risk Based Concentrations 27
8.2.1 Cedar River 27
8.2.2 Vapor Intrusion 29
.^>rojects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\work plans\Jabounty\rtc rev finalVfinal rev labounty work plan (08242016).docx
@pGolder
Associates
-------
ii
165-2829
9.0 REPORTING 30
10.0 REFERENCES 31
List of Tables
Table 1 Project Personnel
Table 2 Sampling and Analytical Summary
Table 3 Sample Methods, Containers, Preservation, and Hold Times
Table 4A Analytical Sensitivity and Precision and Accuracy Limits - Water
Table 4B Analytical Sensitivity and Precision and Accuracy Limits - Sediment
Table 4C Analytical Sensitivity and Precision and Accuracy Limits - Soil Gas
Table 5A Measurement Performance Criteria - Water
Table 5B Measurement Performance Criteria - Sediment
Table 5C Measurement Performance Criteria - Soil Gas
Table 6 Cedar River Arsenic Screening Levels and Risk Based Concentrations
Table 7 Vapor Intrusion Evaluation Screening Levels
List of Figures
Figure 1 Site Location Map
Figure 2 Proposed Sample Locations for Arsenic Evaluation
Figure 3 Proposed Sample Locations for Vapor Intrusion Evaluation
List of Appendices
Appendix A Vapor Intrusion Reference Figures
Appendix B Field Sampling Procedures
Appendix C QAPP Approval Sheet
Appendix D Laboratory Quality Assurance Manuals
Appendix E Site-Specific Human Health Screening Level Calculation Tables
g:\projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\work plans\labounty\rtc rev finalVinal rev labounty wort: plan (08242016).docx
ifFGolder
Associates
-------
August 2016
1
165-2829
l
1.0 INTRODUCTION
On behalf of Zoetis LLC (Zoetis), Golder Associates Inc. (Golder) has prepared this Work Plan for proposed
surface water, pore water, and sediment sampling for the LaBounty Landfill Site (LaBounty Site) located in
Charles City, Iowa, (see Figure 1). The sample collection and analyses outlined herein are proposed in
response to the key findings of the United States Environmental Protection Agency's (USEPA) Fifth 5-Year
Review for the LaBounty Site (USEPA, 2015a) which recommended additional characterization of potential
arsenic impacts to the Cedar River and evaluation of potential vapor intrusion pathways.
A recommendation for additional characterization of potential arsenic impacts to the Cedar River was also
identified as one of the key findings in the Third 5-Year Review for the nearby Shaw Avenue Dump Site
(Shaw Site; USEPA, 2015b), located across the Cedar River from the LaBounty Site. A synergistic
approach was taken in the development of the proposed characterization programs for the LaBounty and
Shaw Sites (referred to herein collectively as "the Sites") due to their close proximity, similar connection to
the Cedar River, and similar contaminant history. This Work Plan also incorporates feedback received
during the project meeting held at USEPA's offices on May 12, 2016. The Cedar River data that will be
collected in conjunction with both Sites could potentially be evaluated together; however, the Sites will be
treated independently for reporting purposes and the discrete datasets proposed for collection for each Site
are large enough to be evaluated independently, if warranted.
The overall goal of the characterization program detailed in this Work Plan is to collect adequate information
to assess current exposure and potential risk to human health and ecological receptors in the context of
USEPA's guidance on 5-Year Reviews (USEPA, September 2012) and to specifically provide sufficient
information to allow to USEPA make a protectiveness determination for the LaBounty Site.
1.1 Site Background
The LaBounty Site is located on the west side of the Cedar River just downstream of Charles City in Floyd
County, Iowa. It occupies an area of about 8 acres situated entirely within the river's 100-yr floodplain. The
average discharge of the Cedar River, as measured at United States Geological Survey Gauging Station
05457700 about 0.4 miles upstream of the Site, is 797 cfs (USEPA, 2015a). The river's narrow floodplain
and linear orientation immediately north and west of the Sites suggests that the river is confined by shallow
bedrock in this area (upstream of the Sites), while the wider floodplain and sinuous course of the river
indicates that bedrock does not provide the primary control on floodplain morphology in the local area of
the Sites (Munter, 1980). Investigation records show the presence of glacial loamy till deposits west of the
LaBounty Site "Landfill Area" which are likely also found on the opposite river bank adjacent to the Shaw
Site and the recreational campground property.
g:\projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\work plans\labounty\rtc rev final\final rev labounty work plan (08242016).docx
_ Golder
Associates
-------
August 2016
2
165-2829
From the 1950's through the 1970's sludge containing various compounds was disposed of at the LaBounty
Site. Following a 1977 Administrative Order to cease operations and prevent runoff, a clay cap was
constructed over the chemical fill to reduce infiltration in 1980 and in 1986 a groundwater diversion wall
was constructed upstream of the chemical waste, as shown on Figure 2, to collect and divert groundwater
away from the waste zone.
A detailed summary of the Site Background information for the LaBounty Site is included in the USEPA's
Fifth 5-Year Review Report (USEPA, 2015a).
1.2 Project Organization
The lead regulatory Agency for the Sites is USEPA Region VII, and Ms. Elizabeth Hagenmaier is USEPA's
Project Manager. The USEPA Project Manager will coordinate with Zoetis' Environmental Liability and
Transactions Leader, Ms. Briana Sye Marvuglio, and also serve as the primary contact with the Golder
Project Director, Mr. P. Stephen Finn. The Project Director will provide overall management of activities
related to the program and coordinate between USEPA Region VII and Zoetis. Mr. Finn will be assisted by
Mr. Andrew Joslyn, the Golder Project Manager, and Ms. Samantha Battle, the Golder Task Manager.
Health and safety will be coordinated by Mr. Kevin Dunsmore of Golder Associates. Overall Quality
Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) of the project sampling operations, and data management will be
provided by the Golder Associates Quality Assurance Coordinator, Ms. Kristin Nuriye, or her designee.
TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. (TestAmerica) of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Pensacola, Florida;~and South
Burlington, Vermont andi Brooks Applied Labs, LLC (Brooks Applied) of Bothell, Washington, will provide
analytical services for sampled media. The TestAmerica Project Manager is Ms. Carrie Gamber, and the
Brooks Applied Labs Project Manager is Ms. Tiffany Stilwater.
Contact information for the project team members is provided in Table 1. The listed project team members
have primary responsibility for the project, although other individuals within their respective organizations
will be involved.
g \projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\work plans\labounty\rtc rev finalVfinal rev labounty work plan (08242016).docx
Associates
|f Golder
-------
August 2016
3
' 165-2829
2.0 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED FIELD SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS
The following issues and recommendations were identified by USEPA in the Fifth 5-Year Review Report.
The proposed approach to address each item is also summarized below and further in Sections 2.1. and
2.2.
¦ Arsenic
• USEPA Issue - "Lack of characterization of the effects of arsenic discharges to the
Cedar River directly adjacent to the site to address human health and ecological risk."
• USEPA Recommendation - "Collection of surface water, sediment and pore water in
Cedar River directly adjacent to the site for total and dissolved arsenic."
• . Proposed Approach - Collect surface water, sediment, and pore water samples in the
Cedar River including areas where the highest likelihood of discharge-exists (see
Section 3.1)
¦ Vapor Intrusion
• USEPA Issue - "No vapor intrusion investigation adequately conducted for the site."
• USEPA Recommendation - "Conduct a vapor intrusion investigation for site-related
volatile constituents, 1,1,2-TCA, its breakdown products, stabilizers, and other volatiles
with historically high detections."
• Proposed Approach - Collect sub-slab soil gas samples from buildings in the vicinity
of the Site and analyze for potential Site-related volatile constituents (see Section 3.2)
2.1 Cedar River
As described in Section 1, the objective of this investigation is to determine if there are unacceptable risks
to human health or the environment from arsenic impacts associated with the LaBounty Site that would
indicate the remedy is no longer protective. The field sampling and analysis program described below was
designed to focus on determining current exposures and potential risks so that USEPA can make a
protectiveness determination.
Based on a review of the conceptual site model, and as discussed during the meeting with USEPA on May
12, 2016, the highest reported arsenic concentrations were in the shallow alluvium wells (compared to the
deeper bedrock wells) and closest to the River (i.e. MW-0879A). In addition, vertical hydraulic gradients in
groundwater vary across the Site but are upwards in the vicinity of the Cedar River. It was determined that
the most efficient and direct way to conservatively evaluate the potential risk associated with arsenic
discharges would be to collect samples of potentially affected media (surface water, sediment, and pore
water) from a wide distribution of Cedar River locations adjacent to the LaBounty Site, which will provide
representative data for the River encompassing potential discharge zones from the Site. Therefore, as
discussed at the meeting, the Cedar River sampling will be performed in close proximity to the river bank
to target the zone where groundwater with the highest arsenic concentrations may be discharging and at
sample locations along the entire length of the LaBounty Site boundary, providing sufficient information to
appropriately assess the potential for risk to ecological populations and human health. Any localized areas
g:\projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\work plans\labounty\rtc rev final\final rev labounty work plan (08242016).docx
MpGolder
'Associates
-------
August 2016 4 165-2829
with elevated arsenic concentrations identified using this sampling approach will be evaluated in terms of
overall exposure and risk in the river, including consideration of available long-term downstream surface
water monitoring results.
Initial reconnaissance was conducted on March 22, 2016 to assess field conditions and potential access
points for proposed sampling locations in the Cedar River. While the proposed sample locations and
methods of sample collection included in this Work Plan are based in part on this initial field reconnaissance,
sample collection procedures and/or sample locations may be adjusted in the field based on conditions
encountered at the time of sampling. Table 2 summarizes the types and numbers of proposed samples,
I
locations, matrices, and the measurement parameters of interest.
Collection of co-located surface water, pore water, and sediment samples at 11 locations (CR16-L01
through CR16-L11) is proposed for the Cedar River along the bank adjacent to the LaBounty Site as shown
on Figure 2. Proposed sample locations take into consideration access constraints and depositional areas
(or lack thereof) that were identified during the initial field reconnaissance, and generally target areas
adjacent to groundwater monitoring wells with additional sample locations filling in the sampling coverage
along the bank adjacent to the LaBounty Site.
Sampling will target low river flow conditions during the late summer months (August/September), pending
USEPA approval. Sampling during low river flow conditions will allow for safer sampler collection and will
lead to a conservative (protective) evaluation of conditions due to low dilution of groundwater discharges.
Samples will be collected from each proposed location (assuming there is suitable material present for
sediment collection), however the samples will be analyzed in a phased approach with samples collected
from locations CR16-L01, CR16-L02, CR16-L05, CR16-L06, CR16-L08, and CR16-L10 analyzed first.
These six primary sample locations were selected because they are distributed along the boundary of the
LaBounty Site and include locations at both the upstream and downstream extents of the Site as,well as
targeted locations adjacent to relevant Site features such as groundwater monitoring wells where arsenic
has been reported at the highest concentrations during the LaBounty groundwater monitoring program.
The other five contingent sample locations provide additional coverage but analysis may not be necessary
based on the risk evaluation process described in Section 8.1.
Surface water samples will be collected from approximately 6 inches above the sediment bottom (to sample
as close to the sediment-surface water interface as possible while reducing entrainment of sediment) and
sediment and pore water samples will be collected from the top 6 inches of sediment to assess the
biologically active zone. In addition, at targeted locations where sufficient sediment is present, sediment
cores may be collected to depths greater than 6 inches (up to 3 locations, targeting locations near
groundwater monitoring wells, if possible). Similarly, surface water will be collected at two depths if
g:\projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\work plans\iabounty\rtc rev final\final rev labounty work plan (08242016).docx
_ Golder
Associates
-------
sufficient water is present (greater than 18 inches); one sample from within 6 inches of the water surface,
in addition to the sample collected from within 6 inches of the river bottom. The near-surface sample will
be archived for potential analysis.
Surface water and sediment sampling will be performed with conventional tools (see Section 3). Pore water
sampling is a less routine sampling task and there are a variety of sampling options available, including
both passive diffusion style samplers and active samplers. For this project, an active sampling method (i.e.,
direct extraction of pore water from in-place sediment) was chosen to provide an efficient and representative
characterization of pore water conditions. This technique will allow for collection of samples
contemporaneously with the surface water and sediment samples, which will produce a complete multi-
media evaluation of conditions. Special care will be taken to reduce the possibility of entraining surface
water in the samples and to minimize the effects on geochemistry (see Section 3.6).
Samples will be analyzed for the following parameters1 to assess arsenic and geochemical indicators that
affect fate and transport and toxicity: (see Table 2 for additional details):
¦ Surface water and pore water - arsenic (unfiltered and filtered), speciated arsenic (III and
V), iron (unfiltered and filtered), total organic carbon, dissolved organic carbon, hardness,
and pH (for samples that cannot be tested for pH using a field meter)
¦ Sediment - arsenic, total organic carbon, grain size, pH, and sulfates/sulfides
2.2 Vapor Intrusion
A review of the Conceptual Site Model for the Site was performed to assist in developing an appropriate
approach to address the USEPA's recommendation for a vapor intrusion evaluation. The Vapor Intrusion
evaluation program was developed based on the following key elements of the Conceptual Site Model:
¦ Concentrations of Site-related VOCs are present in groundwater downgradient of the
landfill footprint, but there are no potential vapor receptors in this area
¦ Groundwater samples collected from wells in the vicinity of the groundwater diversion wall
and nearby buildings, upgradient of the landfill footprint, have shown non-detect or very
low (below screening levels) concentrations of Site-related VOCs
¦ Due to the proximity of certain buildings to the waste disposal area, the potential for vadose
zone transport (opposite the direction of groundwater flow) warrants evaluation
¦ The presence of a stormwater utility line that passes through or near the landfill footprint
and along the boundary between two properties adjacent to the Site is shown in both a
1985 LaBounty Site report and in the City of Charles City current utilities maps (relevant
figures are included in Appendix A)
In order to evaluate the potential that VOCs have moved through the vadose zone toward off-Site buildings,
sub-slab vapor sampling is proposed. The locations for sub-slab sampling were chosen consistent with the
OSWER Technical Guide for Assessing and Mitigating the Vapor Intrusion Pathway from Subsurface Vapor
1 Certain parameters will be analyzed in select samples only as shown in Table 2.
j:\projects\2016 projectsM652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\work plans\labounty\rtc rev fma!\final rev labounty work plan (08242016).docx
P Golder
Associates
-------
August 2016
6
165-2829
Sources to Indoor Air (USEPA, 2015), which suggests evaluating the potential for vapor intrusion at
buildings within 100 feet (laterally or vertically) of the "boundary" of a potential vapor source. On this basis,
collection of 6 sub-slab vapor samples (VI16-LSS-01 through VI16-LSS-06) is proposed from within two
buildings that are within 100 feet laterally of the former landfill's footprint as shown on Figure 3. Note that
the structure shown on aerial photographs that is located closest to the former landfill footprint is an
unoccupied equipment storage shed, so sampling beneath this structure is not proposed. Proposed sample
locations were selected based on the slab layouts and building uses to achieve a generally distributed
coverage throughout the two buildings, including multiple samples in each building and separate samples
at the center of each of the different portions of the buildings that might be separated by sub-slab
partitions/footers based on previous field observations2; however, locations may be adjusted slightly based
on conditions at the time of sampling.
In addition, based on the assessment of potential subsurface utilities that could be acting as preferential
flow pathways, additional sub-pavement) sampling will be performed at one location (VI16-LSS-07) in the
paved area along the boundary between two properties adjacent to the Site where a stormwater sewer line
is reported to exist (see Figure 3 and Appendix A). The final location for this sample will be identified in the
field based on the results of ground penetrating radar (GPR) and any visual indications of the sewer line
location.
Consistent with USEPA's recommendation in the 5-Year Review, samples will be analyzed for 1,1,2-TCA,
tetrachloroethene, trichloroethene, chloroform, benzene, and their potential breakdown products: 1,2-
dichloroethane, 1,1-dichloroethane, 1,1-dichloroethene, cis 1,2-dichloroethene, and vinyl chloride.
USEPA's 5-Year Review Report also suggested evaluating "stabilizers" related to 1,1,2-TCA. The only
common stabilizer of environmental concern is 1,4-dioxane. While 1,4-dioxane is sometimes used as a
stabilizer for 1,1,2-TCA, it is not commonly considered a significant stabilizer of 1,1,2-TCA. The historical
waste stream source for the landfill was from the Fort Dodge Animal Health (FDAH) facility (also located in
Charles City) and Conestoga-Rovers & Associates (CRA) previously confirmed through a review of process
ingredient records that the 1,1,2-TCA raw material used in the facility's chemical production was
unstabilized (i.e. did not contain 1,4-dioxane) (CRA, 2012). There have also only been two, seemingly
anomalous, reported detections of 1,4-dioxane at concentrations slightly exceeding detection limits (10.8
and 11 ug/L) during one event of routine groundwater monitoring (November/December 2010) at the FDAH
facility. The reported detected concentrations of 1,4-dioxane corresponded with 1,1,2-TCA reported
concentrations of 10.8 and 7.4 ug/L, respectively; however, concentrations of 1,1,2-TCA were reported up
to a maximum concentration of 6,470 ug/L during the same event in other samples that did not have 1,4-
dioxane reported above the detection limit (10 ug/L). If 1,4-dioxane was present as a stabilizer in the 1,1,2-
2 The different portions of the buildings can be observed in the aerial photograph based on variations in roofing materials. The northern
building is one large open workshop area, so two sample locations, one in each half of the building, is appropriate.
g:\projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\work plans\labounty\rtc rev finalVfina! rev labounty work plan (08242016).docx
Associates
Golder
-------
August 2016
7
165-2829
TCA used at the facility, concentrations of 1,4-dioxane would have been detected in samples with elevated
concentrations of 1,1,2-TCA. Furthermore, a subsequent round of groundwater sampling failed to replicate
the reported detections from November/December 2010. On this basis, it was concluded that 1,4-dioxane
is not a concern for this Site.
j:\projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\work plans\labounty\rtc rev final\final rev labounty work plan (08242016).docx
__ Golder
Associates
-------
August 2016
8
165-2829
3.0 SAMPLING PROCEDURES
3.1 General Procedures
Sampling procedures for the collection of surface water, pore water, sediment, and sub-slab soil gas are
described below. Standard procedures for equipment handling and decontamination, as well as sample
handling, documentation, and record keeping requirements are included in Appendix B. Quality Assurance
Project Plan (QAPP) components necessary for performing the work are included as sub-sections in this
Work Plan. Appropriately cleaned and prepared sample containers will be supplied by the laboratory for
collection of analytical samples. Reagents, preservation procedures, and analytical holding times will be in
accordance with the published analytical methods and as shown in Table 3. The sequence of sample
collection for various media in the Cedar River will be:
¦ Shallow surface water (where collected)
¦ Deep surface water
¦ Pore water
¦ Sediment
3.2 Training/Certification
Samples will be collected by personnel trained in the use of the sampling equipment. Training will include
use of proper sampling protocols as well as health and safety procedures. Personnel performing the
sampling activities will have current OSHA 40-hour HAZWOPER training and annual updates. Laboratory
personnel will have been trained in the analysis of samples and the review of analytical data. Project
personnel responsible for data quality reviews will be trained in relevant analytical methodologies and data
review guidelines.
3.3 Sampling Equipment
The following is a general list of equipment necessary for surface water, pore water, and sediment sampling:
¦ Measuring stick
¦ Sample collection containers - Sample bottles/jars (provided by the lab and preserved as
necessary for each media)
¦ Appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) and health and safety items
¦ Decontamination materials - as detailed in Appendix B
¦ Documentation - digital camera, handheld GPS enabled device, additional documentation
materials (e.g. chain-of-custody forms, labels, field book, etc.) detailed in Appendix B
General
g:^projects\2016 projectsM652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\work plans\labounty\rtc rev final\final rev labounty work plan (08242016).docx
|F Golder
Associates
-------
August 2016
9
165-2829
Surface Water
¦ Water quality meter - Horiba U-52 (or equivalent, for water quality parameter
measurements)
¦ Sample collection device - extension pole with attached transfer vessel or dedicated
laboratory sample jars, and/or peristaltic pump (for collecting surface water at depth)
Pore Water
¦ Sample collection device - active pore water sampling device such as a "pushpoint"
Henry's sampler, tubing, and a peristaltic pump
Sediment
¦ Sample collection device - dredge (Ponar or Ekman), coring tubes, or stainless steel
shovel/spoon/trowel (and a bottomless bucket), as appropriate depending on the substrate
and depth of water above the sediment
¦ Sample processing supplies - e.g. stainless steel spoons, bowls, etc.
Sub-Slab Soil Gas
¦ Sample collection supplies - hammer drill, helium tracer gas and sampling shrouds,
portable helium detector, Gillian Air (Gil-Air) pump (or similar), and fixed orifice flow rate
controller (to connect to Summa canister)
¦ Photo-ionization detector (PID)
Calibration of water quality meter (Horiba) will be conducted in accordance with the manufacturer's
specifications and the QAPP-related sections of this Work Plan, as appropriate. Decontamination of
equipment between sampling locations will be necessary for any non-dedicated equipment in contact with
samples and will be performed in accordance with the procedures outlined in Appendix B.
3.4 Field Observations for Cedar River Sampling
The following data will be recorded at each sampling location:
Water depth
Precipitation
Approximate surface water velocity
Water quality measurements (dissolved oxygen (DO), pH, salinity, ORP, turbidity,
conductivity, and temperature)
Sample characteristics (sediment type, color, odor, etc.)
Additional relevant observations
Photograph of location
Deviation, if any, from target location and reason
Horizontal coordinates (using a GPS-enabled device) and/or field measurements
representing the sample location
g:\projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\work plans\labounty\rtc rev final\final rev labounty work plan (08242016).docx
_ Golder
Associates
-------
August 2016
10
165-2829
3.5 Surface Water Sample Collection
Surface water sampling will consist of sample collection for laboratory analysis and surface water quality
field readings measured at the time of sampling.
The following procedures will be used during the collection of surface water samples from the Cedar River:
¦ Sample locations will be accessed starting with the farthest downstream location in an
effort to minimize potential impact and disturbance to other sampling locations.
¦ The physical location of the person collecting a surface water sample may dictate the
equipment to be used. Attempts will be made to collect the sample by direct dipping of the
sample container into the water body. Depending on access to the location, wading may
be necessary assuming the water body is safe to enter during low to moderate flow
conditions, or an extendable pole and transfer vessel be used from an access point on the
river bank. Deeper samples may be collected with a peristaltic pump.
¦ Primary samples will be collected from the water column within 6 inches of the bottom of
the surface water body and adjacent to the river bank. Where the water column is 18
inches or greater, two samples will be collected (one from within 6 inches of the water
surface and the other from within 6 inches of the sediment bottom). If two samples are
collected, the shallower sample will be collected first to minimize potential impact and
disturbance.
¦ The sampling container should be submerged to the desired sampling depth prior to
removing the lid and allowing the container to fill with water. However, if there is
preservation material included in the sample container, water will be collected in a separate
container (which will be decontaminated between sampling locations, or which will be
disposable) and poured into the sample container to avoid losing the preservative.
An experienced field crew will implement the sampling in accordance with the procedures described below
and the referenced Golder Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) No. 31 for surface water sampling (Golder,
2003A).
3.6 Pore Water Sample Collection
Pore water samples will be collected using a "pushpoint" Henry's sampling device (Henry's Sampler), an
active method for sediment pore water sampling. The Henry's Sampler consists of a narrow stainless steel
probe which is inserted into the top few centimeters of the sediment during sample collection and a sample
is collected from a sampling port on the opposite end of the device using either a syringe or a peristaltic
pump for sample extraction. Sampling will be conducted consistent with the PushPoint Sampler (US Pat.
#6,470,967) Operator's Manual and Applications Guide (MHE Products, 2003), as appropriate. If a
peristaltic pump is used, a "reverse flow" method will be used during collection of samples intended for
arsenic speciation analysis in order to minimize potential aeration of the sample. The "reverse flow" method
involves shutting the pump off, collecting the sample from the end of the tubing previously being used as
the input (i.e. originally connected to the pushpoint sampler), and allowing water to flow back out through
the input end of the tubing into the sample collection container. This method does not allow the water to
3 \projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\work plans\labounty\rtc rev finalVinal rev labounty work plan (08242016).docx
r_ Golder
Associates
-------
August 2016
11
165-2829
go through the rotor of the pump, which would likely aerate the sample and could bias the speciation
analysis.
If a Henry's sampling device is not practical due to field conditions, an alternative method will be used after
consulting with USEPA.
3.7 Sediment Sample Collection
Surface sediment samples, up to a depth of approximately 6 inches, will be collected as "grab" samples,
likely using a stainless steel scoop/trowel while using a bottomless bucket inserted into the sediment to
reduce water flow (and possible loss of fines) around the sample location. A Ponar dredge, Ekman dredge,
or plastic core tubes, depending on the sample substrate, will be used if the water depth is too deep to
scoop by hand.
Sampling will be conducted from the stream/river bank where possible for Cedar River sample locations,
or by wading, standing on a temporary platform (e.g., plywood) or, from a boat, depending on river height
and other access limitations. Sample locations may also be adjusted in the field based on access or the
location of natural depositional areas, but will initially be identified using a handheld GPS enabled device,
with approximate accuracy of about +/-15 feet.
In the Cedar River, sample locations will be approached from downstream of the location to minimize impact
and disturbance of the sample locations. Samples will be collected from downstream to upstream
concurrent with surface water sampling, so as to minimize resuspension of particulates and subsequent
redeposition at a different sampling location.
The overall goal of sediment collection is to collect sufficient material over the sample location to account
for both compositional and distributional heterogeneity. Because more sediment may be collected at each
location than could be practically forwarded to the laboratory, the samples will be homogenized thoroughly
to provide a smaller but representative sample of material for shipment to the laboratory. A photograph of
the sample will be taken prior to homogenization. Once homogenized, the entire sample from a location
will be laid out in the tray or bowl and small spoon samples will be taken randomly across the mix until the
analytical sample jar is filled. Excess material will be returned to the sampling location from which the
material was generated or will be handled as IDW (see Section 3.8) if suspected of being highly
I
contaminated based on field observations. When practical, sediment sample jars will be placed
immediately on ice (to maintain 4°C) in a cooler. In some sampling areas, it will not be feasible to bring a
cooler to the sediment sample location. In those cases, the samples will be held until the next opportunity
to access the cooler (not to exceed 8 hours). Sediment samples will be maintained at 4°C until they are
shipped to the approved laboratory.
g:\projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\work plans\labounty\rtc rev final\final rev labounty work plan (08242016) docx
Associates
Golder
-------
August 2016 12 165-2829
An experienced field crew will implement the sampling in accordance with the procedures described below
and Golder Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) No. 18 for sediment sampling (Golder, 2003B).
3.7.1 Dredging Procedure
¦ Prior to deploying the dredging device, release chains and retrieval rope will be unwrapped
from around the sampler.
¦ The dredge will be lowered into the water until it contacts the sediment surface bottom and
penetrates the sediment up to approximately 6 inches.
¦ The dredge will be closed by sending the messenger or jerking the retrieval rope, and
retrieved by pulling up on the rope.
¦ Prior to opening the doors on the top of the sampler, a visual check will be made to
determine if the sampler has been properly deployed.
¦ Upon opening the doors, the sample should be inspected for acceptability. Particularly,
the dredge should not be overfilled with sediment (i.e. sediment surface pressing against
the top of the dredge or extruding through the top of the sampler).
3.7.2 Core Tube Procedure
¦ Sediment from within 6 inches of the sediment surface will be collected using a hand auger
or a sediment coring device, such as a piston corer, or hand-driven push corer.
¦ Depending on the coring device used, cores will be fitted with a new disposable plastic
(e.g., HDPE, PVC, or similar) liner for each sample location or will be decontaminated prior
to use at each location.
¦ The coring device will be extracted from the sediment by hand and/or using a mechanical
device. The core will be kept vertical until processing can begin. The coring device will be
opened and the liner removed. If standing water is present at the top of the sample, the
liner will be punctured just above the sediment surface so that overlying water can drain
out of the sample, or the sample core will be pushed slowly from the bottom using a
decontaminated or dedicated core extruding rod, allowing the overlying water to pour out
of the liner prior to extracting the core. The sample core will then be extruded from the
sampler using a decontaminated or dedicated plunger and then laid out on a dedicated
sheet of plastic or aluminum foil for processing.
¦ Dedicated equipment will be used at each sample location, with the exception of the coring
device which will be rinsed with river water or tap water to remove particulates before
moving to the next sample location.
3.8 Sub-Slab Vapor Sample Collection
Prior to collection of sub-slab vapor samples, a geophysical survey using GPR will be conducted to screen
for potential underground utilities in the vicinity of proposed sample locations. A building survey including
the following will also be conducted prior to sample collection:
¦ Identification and documentation (i.e. note in field notebook and photograph) of potential
background sources of VOCs
¦ Assessment of the building construction (e.g., concrete slab, air flow)
¦ Visual identification of potential preferential VI pathways into the building
g:\projects\2016 projects\1652829 ¦ zoetis Charles city\200 reports\work plans\labounty\rtc rev finaltfinal rev labounty worV plan (08242016).docx
Golder
Associates
-------
13
165-2829
The sub-slab (or sub-pavement) vapor samples will be collected using 6 liter Summa canisters over a period
of 30 minutes at a rate of 200 milliliters per minute (ml/min). Sub-slab (or sub-pavement) vapor collection
will include the following preparation tasks prior to sampling:
¦ Temporary sampling ports will be installed through the building's concrete slab or the pavement
using a hammer drill with a 3/8 inch diameter bit. The sub-slab port will then be allowed to
equilibrate for at least 2 hours prior to purging and sample collection.
¦ Three probe/tubing volumes will be purged at a rate of 200 ml/min or less using a Gil-Air pump,
or similar.
¦ Helium tracer tests will be performed at each sample port, prior to sampling, to verify the
integrity of the annual seal, sample port/fittings, and sample tubing/connections. A shroud will
be placed over the sample port and filled with helium (tracer gas), and the sample port will be
opened and connected to a portable helium detector. If a leak is detected, the sampling set-
up will be adjusted and re-tested to confirm the integrity before starting the sub-slab vapor
sampling.
An experienced field crew will implement the sampling in accordance with the procedures described above
and Golder Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) Nos. 1 through 3 for soil gas probe installation, leak
testing, and sub-slab vapor sampling (Golder, 201 OA, 2010B, 2010C).
Horizontal coordinates (latitude and longitude) for sample VI16-LSS-07 (located outside) will be recorded
using a GPS-enabled device; however, because samples VI16-LSS-01 through VI16-LSS-06 will be
collected from within buildings, the locations will be documented by measuring from two fixed locations
within the portion of the building where the sample is collected (e.g., the corner where two walls meet, etc.).
3.9 Investigation Derived Waste
Investigation derived waste (IDW) generated during this sampling program is expected to be minimal.
Anticipated IDW may include:
¦ General waste (i.e. disposable sampling equipment/materials, personal protective
equipment (PPE), and associated garbage)
¦ Excess sediment generated during sampling
¦ Spent decontamination liquids
General lightly soiled waste will be collected in garbage bags and disposed of with regular trash. Excess
sediment generated during the sampling activities that is not returned to the area of collection (Cedar River)
will be containerized in DOT-approved 55-gallon drums. Spent decontamination liquids and excess
sediment (if any) will be transported in separate 5-gallon buckets with secured lids to DOT-approved 55
gallon drums staged on the LaBounty Site. IDW will be managed in accordance with the procedures in
Appendix B.
g:\projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\work plansVabountyVtc rev final\final rev labounty work plan (08242016) docx
Hp Golder
Associates
-------
August 2016
14
165-2829
4.0 DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES
The USEPA Data Quality Objectives (DQO) Guidance document specifies that sampling programs be
designed in order to meet the requirements of the investigation and achieve the DQOs. Part of this process
is to determine what data is being collected and how it will be used in assessing Site conditions. For the
purposes of this project, definitive data will be collected from samples that are submitted to an approved
laboratory for analysis, and data collected using field measurement instruments will supplement the dataset
in order to provide a complete set of definitive data.
Measurement performance criteria are one method of expressing the DQOs in a manner that can be
quantified and evaluated. This section describes the measurement performance criteria for this program
using data quality indicators expressed as precision, accuracy, representativeness, completeness,
comparability and sensitivity (PARCCS). Where possible, acceptance criteria are specified to help
delineate minimum acceptability levels for use of data in the overall decision making process. For the
purposes of this project, data quality indicators are defined as follows:
1. Precision evaluates agreement or reproducibility among individual measurements of the same
property, usually made under the same conditions
2. Accuracy represents the degree of a measurement's agreement with the true or accepted value
3. Representativeness is the degree to which a measurement accurately and precisely represents a
characteristic of a population, parameter, or variations at a sampling point, a process condition, or
an environmental condition
4. Completeness measures the amount of valid data compared with the amount of valid data predicted
under correct normal conditions
5. Comparability expresses the confidence with which one data set can be compared with another
data set in regard to the same property
6. Sensitivity evaluates the capability of a method or instrument to detect the parameter of concern
at a specified level in the absence of sample matrix interferences
The accuracy, precision, and representativeness of data will be functions of the sample origin, analytical or
monitoring procedures and the sample matrix. Quality Control (QC) practices for the evaluation of these
data quality indicators include the'use of accepted analytical procedures, adherence to hold time, and
analysis of QC samples (e.g., blanks, replicates, spikes, calibration standards and reference standards).
Quantitative Quality Assurance (QA) objectives for Precision and Accuracy, along with Sensitivity
(detection limits) are established in accordance with the specific analytical methodologies, historical data,
laboratory method validation studies and laboratory experience with similar samples.
g:\projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\work plans\Jabounty\rtc rev finaltfinal rev labounty work plan (08242016).docx
F Golder
Associates
-------
Representativeness is a qualitative characteristic which primarily addresses proper design of a sampling
program in terms of the number and location of samples and sample collection techniques. The
representativeness of the analytical data is a function of the procedures used to process the samples.
Completeness is a qualitative characteristic which is defined as the fraction of valid data obtained from a
measurement system (e.g., sampling and analysis) compared to that which was planned. Completeness
can be less than 100% due to poor sample recovery, sample damage, or disqualification of results which
are outside of control limits due to laboratory error or matrix-specific interferences. Completeness is
documented by including sufficient information in the laboratory reports to allow the data user to assess the
quality of the results. The overall completeness goal for each task is difficult to determine prior to data
acquisition as it can be affected by the variability in results and other factors. However for this project, all
reasonable attempts will be made to attain 85% completeness or better (field and laboratory).
Comparability is a qualitative characteristic which allows for comparison of analytical results with those
obtained by other laboratories. This may be accomplished through the use of standard accepted
j
methodologies, traceability of standards to the National Bureau of Standards (NBS) or USEPA sources,
use of appropriate levels of quality control, reporting results in consistent, standard units of measure, and
participation in inter-laboratory studies designed to evaluate laboratory performance.
The measurement performance criteria established for each parameter are based on the QC parameters
developed by the laboratories in accordance with the analytical methods and the laboratory quality
assurance policies. Laboratory QC criteria are routinely re-evaluated following the procedures in the
laboratory quality assurance policies and the requirements of the analytical methods. Should the laboratory
QC limits change between the preparation of this Work Plan and the sample analyses, the limits in place at
the time of sample analysis will be used to evaluate data usability.
The sensitivity, precision, and accuracy criteria (Tables 4A, 4B, and 4C), and specific measurement
performance criteria (Tables 5A, 5B, and 5C) outlined for this program may not always be achievable. It
should be noted that the reporting limits provided in Tables 4A, 4B, and 4C are the minimum reporting limits
appropriate for undiluted, relatively uncontaminated samples. However, the reporting limits may be
elevated due to contaminant concentrations in excess of the method calibration range, the sample matrix,
and percent moisture adjustment for soil samples. The analytical data will undergo data quality review to
evaluate data usability as described in Section 7.0 of this Work Plan. Professional judgment will be used
to determine data usability with respect to project goals.
3 projects\2016 project$\l652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\wori< plans\labounty\rtc rev finaltfinal rev labounty work plan (08242016).docx
¦j)F Golder
Associates
-------
August 2016
16
165-2829
5.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
This quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) requirements and procedures for this project have been
developed and summarized in accordance with the following guidance documents:
1. EPA Requirements for Quality Assurance Project Plans (EPA QA/R-5), March 2001
2. Guidance for the Data Quality Objective Process. EPA QA/G-4 (EPA/240/B-06/001), dated
February 2006
3. Guidance for Labeling Externally Validated Laboratory Analytical Data for Superfund Use. EPA
540-R-08-005, dated January 2009
4. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste - Physical/Chemical Methods. SW-846.
(http://www.epa.gov/osw/hazard/testmethods/sw846/online/)
5. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Twenty-Second Edition,
6. National Functional Guidelines for Superfund Organic Methods Data Review. (OSWER 9355.0-
132, EPA-540-R-014-002), dated August 2014
7. National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Superfund Data Review. (OSWER 9355.0-131,
EPA-540-R-013-001), dated August 2014
This Work Plan includes the essential QAPP elements summarized in the USEPA Requirements of Quality
Assurance Project Plans (2001). The essential elements are Project Management, Data Generation and
Acquisition, Assessment and Oversight, and Data Validation and Usability. The Project Management
Group (Title Page, the Table of Contents, and the Distribution List) are included in the beginning of this
document. The remaining elements (Data Generation and Acquisition, Assessment and Oversight, and
Data Validation and Usability) are presented in Sections 5 through 7. The QAPP Approval Sheet is included
as Appendix C.
Laboratory QA procedures regarding personnel, management structure, analytical equipment, and data
management are contained in the laboratories' Quality Assurance Manuals, which are included as Appendix
D. Any deviation from a technical procedure or reference method identified in this Work Plan will be noted
within the appropriate logbook and, for laboratory analyses, in the Case Narrative of the analytical report.
5.1 Analytical Methods
The analytical methods for this project were selected to achieve detection limits that would facilitate
quantification of the concentrations of the required target analytes and comparison of those concentrations
to developed screening levels.
Method references for the analyses to be performed and the laboratory responsible for each analysis are
summarized in Table 3. The standard turnaround times for the proposed analyses performed by
2011
g:\projects\2016 projects\1652829 • zoetis charles city\200 reports\work plans\Jabounty\rtc rev finaltfinal rev labounty work plan (08242016).docx
^jtJFGolder
£
-------
August 2016
17
165-2829
TestAmerica and Brooks Applied are 10 and 20 business days, respectively. The target analytes are
presented in Tables 4A, 4B, and 4C which include the following:
¦ List of compounds by method and matrix
¦ Applicable standards or screening levels by method and matrix
¦ Project reporting limits denoting analytical sensitivity requirements by method and matrix
¦ Precision and accuracy limits
5.2 Quality Control
This section describes the various QA/QC samples that will be collected in the field and analyzed in the
laboratory and the frequency at which they will be performed. Table 2 summarizes the frequency of QA/QC
sample collection. QA/QC samples that will be collected will consist of field rinsate blanks, field duplicates,
and matrix spike/matrix spike duplicates (MS/MSD). These QA/QC samples are described briefly in the
following sections.
5.2.1 Field Rinsate Blanks
Field rinsate blanks will be collected for all required analyses at a frequency of one per 20 primary samples
per type of decontamination event performed (i.e. different sampling equipment types) where non-dedicated
equipment is used. Field rinsate blanks are prepared in the field using lab-supplied demonstrated analyte
free water. The water is poured over and through each type of sampling equipment and submitted to the
laboratory for analysis of target analytes.
5.2.2 Field Duplicates
Field duplicates will be collected for all required analyses at a frequency of one per 20 primary samples per
matrix. Field duplicates are collected by sampling the same location twice, but the field duplicate is
assigned a unique sample identification number. Note that field duplicate analyses will not be performed
for sediment grain size if insufficient sediment is recovered.
5.2.3 MS/MSD
MS/MSD samples will be collected for all required analyses at a frequency of one per 20 primary samples
per matrix. Additional sample volume is collected from a location and submitted to the laboratory for
analysis. The laboratory will use the additional volume to prepare spiked samples to assess accuracy and
precision.
5.2.4 Quality Control Requirements for Analysis
Laboratory QC checks will be performed in accordance with the specific analytical methods. Details of the
internal QC checks utilized by the laboratory can be found in the laboratories' quality assurance manuals
(QAMs) (Appendix D) and the published analytical methods. Laboratory QC samples will be used to
g:\projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\work plans\labounty\rtc rev finalVflnal rev labounty work plan (08242016).docx
Associates
Golder
-------
August 2016
18
165-2829
determine if results may have been affected by field activities or procedures used in sample transportation
or if matrix interferences are an issue. Assessment of laboratory QC will take into account the measurement
performance criteria specified in Tables 5A, 5B, and 5C. The laboratories routinely re-evaluate their QC
criteria using the procedures in their quality assurance manuals. Analytical data that fall outside QC criteria
will be qualified as discussed in the data evaluation and usability procedures section.
5.3 Instrument/Equipment Testing, Inspection, and Maintenance
Preventive maintenance of equipment is essential if project resources are to be utilized in a cost-effective
manner. Preventive maintenance will ensure accuracy of measurement systems, minimize downtime, and
provide inventory control of critical spare parts, backup systems, and other necessary equipment. The field
sampling team will maintain an inventory of replacement parts for field instruments, and will routinely
perform preventive maintenance or repair. Spare parts that often require replacement will be kept on hand
at the Sites during field activities. The preventive maintenance approach for equipment used in the field for
sampling, monitoring, and testing includes checking batteries, checking condition of meters, checking
sample bottles for cleanliness and breakage, and ensuring that a reasonable supply of bottles, batteries,
probes, calibration solution, and other supplies are readily available to avoid unnecessary delays in the
field. Specifically, water quality measurement probes (Horiba U-52) and PIDs used during the
implementation of this field program will be inspected and calibrated in accordance with manufacturer
specifications prior to field deployment. Field personnel will inspect, test, and calibrate this equipment daily,
following manufacturer recommendations.
Preventive maintenance of laboratory equipment and hardware can be found in the laboratories' QAMs
(Appendix D). More than one instrument is generally available for each type of analysis in case the initial
instrument malfunctions or does not meet the required measurement criteria. Laboratory personnel or
qualified manufacturer representatives will perform preventive maintenance and repair. The laboratory will
retain logbooks documenting preventative maintenance and repair for each instrument.
5.4 Instrument/Equipment Calibration and Frequency
5.4.1 Field Calibration
The calibration and maintenance of field equipment will be the responsibility of the field sampling team.
Field instruments, such as meters for measuring field parameters, will be standardized/ calibrated in
accordance with the manufacturers' recommendations against NBS traceable standards, where
appropriate. Appropriate calibration records will be maintained in project field notebooks or on a calibration
log form. The field team leader is responsible for ensuring that calibrations are properly performed at the
appropriate frequency. Additional information regarding field calibration procedures is provided in Appendix
B.
g:\projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 report$\work plans\labounty\rtc rev final\final rev labounty work plan (08242016).docx
r Golder
Associates
-------
August 2016
19
165-2829
5.4.2 Laboratory Calibration
The major chemical analytical equipment and the individual analytical methods and calibration procedures
are detailed in the laboratory QAMs (Appendix D). While the laboratories follow specified procedures in
the analytical methods, various sources for calibration are used (e.g., USEPA repository, NBS, Supelco,
Aldrich and Chem Service). The laboratories assure traceability of stock solutions and working standards
back to the neat material.
5.5 Inspection/Acceptance of Supplies and Consumables
All sampling equipment, supplies and consumables (e.g., sample containers) will be inspected by field
personnel prior to use to assess that proper operation/functionality can be achieved (e.g., proper containers,
no broken containers, no missing or ill-fitting lids, etc.) and to support a safe working environment. The
laboratories have preventative maintenance and health and safety programs to ensure proper execution of
project work.
5.6 Data Acquisition Measurements (Non-Direct Measurements)
Non-direct means of data acquisition refers to the use of non-measurement sources such as computer
databases, spreadsheets, programs and literature files. To ensure confidence in the data generated from
these sources, computer programs used for this project will be within the public domain and, as such,
accepted by the industry. Historical data generated from samples collected and analyzed with approved
USEPA methodologies have been used to scope the elements of the field work.
5.7 Data Management
The most current, USEPA-approved version of this Work Plan will be provided to project personnel, as
necessary. The Golder Project Manager will be responsible for notifying project personnel of any approved
revisions during implementation of the project. Data collected during this project will be retained in both
hardcopy and electronic format. Data collected in the field will be transcribed from field forms or notebooks
and tabulated, as appropriate, using a spreadsheet or database program. Requirements for field forms
(e.g., chain of custody forms) are included in Appendix B. Any data entry from field notes/forms will be
checked for transcription errors.
Golder will maintain electronic copies of all laboratory deliverables as part of the project files for at least 10
years following completion of the work. After 10 years, if Golder is no longer going to maintain laboratory
records, Zoetis will be notified and any records not already retained by Zoetis will be made available. A
copy of electronic data deliverables (i.e. chemistry and available geotechnical) provided by laboratories will
also be incorporated into the Site database.
g:^rojects\2016 projectsM652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reportsXwork plans\labounty\rtc rev ftnalVflnal rev labounty work plan (08242016).docx
>F Golder
Associates
-------
August 2016
20
165-2829
5.7.1 Laboratory Data Deliverable Format
TestAmerica and Brooks Applied will submit analytical reports directly to Golder. The original laboratory
analytical files will be stored at the laboratory facilities. Analytical data packages will contain all information
necessary for data validation. At a minimum, the following information is needed as appropriate to the
analytical methodology:
1. General requirements:
A. Title/Cover page
B. Table of Contents
C. Chain of Custody
D. Methodology Review
E. Laboratory Chronicle
F. Conformance/Non-Conformance Summary
2. GC/MS Requirements
3. GC Requirements
4. Metals Requirements
5. General Chemistry Requirements
5.7.2 Laboratory Electronic Data Deliverable Format
The laboratories will produce electronic data deliverables (EDDs) containing the results for field and QC
samples, using Golder's specified format consisting of the EFW2FSample, EFW2LabTST, EFW2LabRES,
and EFW2LabBCH tables as specified in the EFWEDD format defined by EarthSoft. All EDDs will be
uploaded and maintained in the project EQulS database. Any qualifiers resulting from data validation will
also be entered into the database. Database entries will be spot checked for correctness and
completeness, and tabulated analytical results will be generated.
g:\projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\work plans\labounty\rtc rev finalVinal rev labounty work plan (08242016).docx
Associates
Golder
-------
6.1 Assessments and Response Actions
For field measurements, the field team leader will be responsible for performance while the analyst and
sample custodian will be responsible for performance within the laboratory. The performance of activities
or procedures must comply with those specified in this Work Plan. The responsible personnel must be
prepared to justify that the specified procedure or reference method was implemented properly. Deviations
of a technical procedure or reference method must be noted within the appropriate logbook and, for
laboratory analyses, in the Case Narrative of the analytical report.
6.1.1 Corrective Action Procedures
The need for corrective action, will be based upon predetermined limits for acceptability for all aspects of
sample collection and analysis, which may include, but are not limited to: the PARCCS criteria (Tables 5A,
5B, and 5C); historical analytical data; laboratory control spike sample results; and experience using the
analytical procedures for measurement in relation to the specific methodologies. The need for corrective
action may be determined, as appropriate, by any member of the project team, including field samplers,
analysts, supervisors, quality assurance personnel, laboratory managers, and project managers.
The Laboratory Project Manager, if requested, will describe the corrective action procedures used by the
laboratory to eliminate problems in their analytical systems. Problems that cannot be resolved by the
analysts, laboratory managers, or QA officers will be brought to the attention of the Golder Associates QA
Coordinator, who will discuss with the Golder Associates Project Manager. The Golder Associates Project
Manager and Zoetis will determine if, and to what extent, corrective action should be taken.
The laboratory personnel will assess laboratory QC samples, if applicable, and re-analyze samples which
do not meet QC criteria prior to expiration of hold times, when possible. Corrective actions for samples not
meeting QC criteria may include re-analysis, or re-sampling and analysis. Laboratory personnel will use
Corrective Action Report forms to document identification and resolution of defects. These report forms are
kept on file in the laboratory QA files.
The detection of system and performance problems and the corrective actions procedures to be used in
the field during sample collection and data measurement will be documented in the field logbooks and
placed in the project files. Any problems which cannot be resolved by the field sampling team will be
brought to the attention of the Golder Project Manager, who will discuss the matter with Zoetis and the
USEPA RPM, as needed, and the Golder Project Manager will determine if, and to what extent, corrective
action should be taken.
g:^>rojects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\work plans\labounty\rtc rev fina!\final rev labounty worfc plan (08242016).docx
¦IF Golder
Associates
-------
August 2016
22
165-2829
If a system or performance audit uncovers problems requiring corrective action, the corrective action will
be initiated upon approval of the responsible supervisor(s); documentation of corrective actions will
generally be made in a letter report to Zoetis and the City.
6.2 Reports to Management
Quality assurance deficiencies in the field must be reported to the field team leader and the Golder Project
Manager. Quality assurance deficiencies in the laboratory must be reported in a timely manner to the
Laboratory Project Manager, who will report to the Golder QA Coordinator. The laboratory's policies and
procedures for reporting quality assurance activities to management are included in the laboratory QAMs
(Appendix D). Corrective actions for field and laboratory activities will be reported to the Golder Project
Manager, Zoetis, and, if necessary, the USEPA RPM.
g:\projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\work plans\labounty\rtc rev final\final rev labounty work plan (08242016).docx
Associates
Golder
-------
August 2016
23
165-2829
7.0 DATA VALIDATION/ USABILITY
7.1 Data Review, Verification, and Validation
The precision, accuracy, and sensitivity of the data will be evaluated based upon field sampling
documentation, adherence to sample holding times, and analysis of the QC samples (duplicates, spikes,
and blanks). The data will be evaluated in relationship to the sensitivity, precision, and accuracy criteria
defined in Tables 4A, 4B, and 4C, and the specific measurement performance criteria defined in Tables 5A,
5B, and 5C. Analytical data packages will be reviewed for completeness and QC summaries will be
evaluated.
The data quality review (DQR) required for this project will be performed in accordance with the Guidance
for Labeling Externally Validated Laboratory Analytical Data for Superfund Use (EPA 540-R-08-005). All
analytical data will undergo a Stage 1 verification check, which involves verification of data completeness.
The following data quality indicators will be examined during the Stage 1 verification check:
Sample preservation and condition (including %moisture for sediment)
Analytical sensitivity (i.e. detection and reporting limits)
Holding times for both sample preparation (extraction) and analysis
Method and Field Blanks
Field duplicate relative percent difference (RPD)
Laboratory duplicate RPD
All total arsenic, dissolved arsenic, and arsenic speciation data will undergo a Stage 2B verification and
validation, which includes the Stage 1 and 2A processes and adds the validation of instrument related QC
indicators for compliance with method requirements. The following data quality indicators will be examined
during the Stage 2B data validation:
¦ Sample preservation and condition (including %moisture for sediment)
¦ Analytical sensitivity (i.e. detection and reporting limits)
¦ Holding times for both sample preparation (extraction) and analysis
¦ Method and Field Blanks
¦ LCS/LCSD Recoveries and RPD
¦ MS/MSD Recoveries and RPD
¦ Field duplicate RPD
¦ Laboratory duplicate RPD
g:\projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\work plans\labounty\rtc rev finalVflnal rev labounty work plan (08242016).docx
Associates
Golder
-------
August 2016
24
165-2829
¦ Initial calibrations response factors and RSD
¦ Continuing calibration response factors and drift
¦ Internal standard responses and retention times
¦ Instrument performance (tuning) checks
¦ Inorganic instrument blanks
¦ ICP interference checks and serial dilutions
If the measurement performance criteria are not achieved, data will be qualified as necessary in accordance
with the National Function Guidelines for Data Review, outlined below, and qualifications will be explained
in a DQR narrative. All data review required for this project will be performed under the direction of the
Golder Associates QA Coordinator and the Laboratory Project Manager.
¦ National Functional Guidelines for Superfund Organic Methods Data Review, (OSWER 9355.0-
132, EPA-540-R-014-002), dated August 2014.
¦ National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Superfund Data Review, (OSWER 9355.0-131,
EPA-540-R-013-001), dated August 2014.
As summarized in Tables 5A, 5B, and 5C method blanks are expected not to contain target analytes with
concentrations greater than the reporting limit with the possible exception of common laboratory
contaminants.
Field and laboratory duplicate results will be assessed based upon the RPD between values, using the
following equation:
RPD = (D1 - D2) x 100%
(D1 + D2)/2
Where: D1 = Primary sample result
D2 = Duplicate sample resu|t
Laboratory control spiked samples will be assessed based upon the percent recovery (%R) of spiked
analytes. The percent recovery will be calculated using the following equation:
%R = X x 100%
TV
Where: X = observed value of measurement
TV = "true" value of spiked analyte
MS/MSD data will be assessed based upon the percent recovery of spiked analytes using the following
equation:
g:\projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\work plans\labounty\rtc rev finalVflnal rev labounty work plan (08242016).docx
_ Golder
Associates
-------
25
165-2829
% R = (SSR-SFO x 100%
SA
Where:
SSR = Spiked sample result for analyte x
SR = Sample result for analyte x
SA = Spike added of analyte x
The relative percent difference between the MS/MSD results will be calculated using the RPD equation
presented above.
Data completeness will be assessed based upon the amount of valid data obtained from a particular
measurement system (sampling and analysis). It may be quantitatively expressed using the following
equation:
TestAmerica and Brooks Applied will assess QC data with regard to precision and accuracy. Individuals
making field measurements will determine whether or not field QC criteria are being met. Corrective actions
will be initiated as necessary. Laboratory analytical data will be assessed under the direction of the Golder
Associates QA Coordinator to determine usability with regard to the measurement performance criteria.
7.2 Verification and Validation Methods
Qualified results will be reported for all validated samples on the analytical reporting forms provided in the
data packages or as data summary tables accompanying the laboratory deliverable package.
As noted above, data may not always meet precision and accuracy requirements but may still be considered
usable. The data will be assessed with regard to the project measurement performance criteria, and
professional judgment will be used in determining data usability. Any data quality issues identified during
the data usability review will be shared with data users following the same lines of communication discussed
in Section 6.2 and corrective actions will be performed as necessary.
The overall findings of the data usability review and any qualifications added to the data will also be
explained in a Data Quality Review (DQR) narrative, a summary of which will be included in the report
described in Section 9.0.
7.3 Reconciliation with User Requirements
Throughout the sampling program, the Golder Project Manager and Zoetis will determine if project DQOs
are being met and assess whether the data being collected is sufficient and appropriate. Individuals making
Completeness = N1 x 100%
N2
Where:
N1 = number of valid measurements obtained
N2 = number of valid measurements expected
g:\projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\work plans\!abounty\rtc rev finaltfinal rev labounty work plan (08242016).'docx
(F Golder
Associates
-------
26
165-2829
measurements throughout the process will also make assessments of whether the DQOs are being met.
The field QA/QC will be overseen by the field team leader. Corrective actions will be initiated in the field as
necessary.
g:\projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\work plansMabounty\rtc rev final\final rev labounty worfc plan (08242016).docx -ASSOClfltCS
-------
August 2016
27
165-2829
8.0 RISK EVALUATION
8.1 Overview
As described in Sections 1, the objective of the field sampling program is to determine if unacceptable
human health and/or ecological risks exist due to exposure to arsenic related to the LaBounty Site. As
such, a focused and phased approach to risk evaluation will be taken as summarized below.
¦ Identify appropriate generic screening levels or develop site-specific levels (separate
human health and ecological screening levels for each of the media to be sampled)
¦ Compare initial results against selected screening levels for each medium
¦ If none of the initial results exceed the selected screening levels, then USEPA can
determine that the existing remedy is protective
¦ If one or more results exceed the screening level, initiate laboratory analysis of archived
samples
¦ Calculate arithmetic average (mean) and 95% upper confidence limits (UCLs) on the mean
concentrations using the full data set3
¦ Compare the average and 95% UCL against the selected screening levels to determine
protectiveness of the existing remedy
¦ Additional investigation and/or a more detailed risk assessment may be undertaken based
on the results
8.2 Screening Levels and Site-Specific Risk Based Concentrations
8.2.1 Cedar River
As discussed during the May 12, 2016 meeting with USEPA, a review of available generic screening levels
for protection of both human health and ecological receptors was performed for the three media being
sampled in the Cedar River: sediment, surface water, and pore water. Based on this review, the screening
levels shown in Table 6 were selected (some of which are promulgated surface water quality standards).
The screening levels were established to meet the objective of making a protectiveness determination for
an existing remedy as opposed to performing an initial risk characterization for a site.
As suggested by USEPA, proposed initial site-specific human health-based screening levels for sediment
and surface water have been developed taking into account reasonable exposure assumptions for the
LaBounty Site. Development of site-specific screening levels for evaluation of potential risk to ecological
receptors is not needed at this time because suitable generic screening levels are available.
3 Note that the LaBounty and Shaw Sites data sets for Cedar River may be combined when calculating mean and 95% UCL statistics
because there is no separation between the two banks of the river and exposure can be assumed to occur across the entire area.
g:\projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\work plans\labounty\jlc rev fma!\final rev labounty work plan (08242016).docx
Associates
Golder
-------
August 2016
28
165-2829
Site-specific risk-based concentrations for human health screening were calculated based on a target
cancer risk of 5x10"5 and a target non cancer hazard quotient of 0.54. For the following receptors:
Non-Cancer
¦ Child (ages 1 or 25 through < 6)
¦ Older Child (ages 6 through < 16)
¦ Adult (ages 16 through 26)
Cancer
¦ Combined lifetime for above receptors
The following exposure pathways were included:
¦ Sediment:
• Incidental ingestion
• Dermal contact
¦ Surface water:
• Incidental ingestion while wading/swimming
Consistent with standard risk assessment practice, the exposure factors used to calculate the human health
screening levels are based primarily on the USEPA Exposure Factors Handbook (USEPA, 2011) and the
default exposure factors used to calculate the generic Regional Screening Levels (RSLs) for Superfund
(USEPA, 2016). Professional judgement was also used to determine certain exposure frequencies, based
on the local climate. The exposure factors and rationale (or reference) are summarized in the calculation
tables that are included in Appendix E. Current cancer slope factors and reference doses taken from
USEPA's IRIS database were used. A bioconcentration factor of 1 liter per kilogram was used based on
reported bioconcentration factors for fish (IDNR 2007).
Standard dose estimation equations from RAGS Part A were mathematically rearranged to calculate media
concentrations that would result in the specified target risk levels. Where multiple exposure pathways (e.g.,
4 These Site-specific risk-based concentrations have been calculated so that the combined target risk for exposure to both surface
water and sediment will be below USEPA's acceptable risk thresholds.
5 Children less than 2 years of age are not expected to be exposed directly to surface water and sediment from swimming/wading in
the river. Children under the age of 1 are not expected to consume fish from the river.
• Dermal contact while wading/swimming
• Fish ingestion
g:\projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\work plans\labounty\rtc rev flnal\final rev labounty work plan (08242016).docx
Golder
•~Associates
-------
August 2016
29
165-2829
ingestion, dermal) were evaluated for a given matrix (e.g., surface water), the pathway specific target
concentrations were combined using the equation below to yield an overall screening level for that matrix6:
After calculating target concentrations for each receptor and endpoint (cancer vs. non-cancer), the lowest
calculated value was selected for screening purposes (see Table 6).
8.2.2 Vapor Intrusion
USEPA Regional Screening Levels (RSLs7; USEPA, 2016) based on a commercial scenario with a target
cancer risk of 1.0x10"5 and a target non cancer hazard quotient of 1.0 for sub-slab vapor are summarized
in Table 7 for comparison to sub-slab vapor analytical results. The values shown in Table 7 were
determined by dividing the indoor air RSLs by USEPA's recommended attenuation factor of 0.03 to
determine sub-slab screening values.
6 Note that fish ingestion was incorporated into the screening level for surface water, which conservatively assumes that the same
individuals are ingesting fish from the water body, and are being exposed through incidental ingestion and dermal contact.
7 Note that the TCE value of 200 ug/m3 rather than the current RSL, is being used for initial screening at the request of USEPA Region
7.
1
Where,
n = number of pathways
Conet- = target concentration for pathway i
g \projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\work plans\!abounty\rtc rev finaltfnal rev labounty work plan (08242016).docx
Jsf Golder
Associates
-------
9.0 REPORTING
A summary report will be prepared by Golder on behalf of Zoetis following completion of the field work and
receipt of all analytical data and submitted to USEPA for review. The summary report will include the
following components:
¦ Summary of field work completed, including any deviations from the Work Plan
¦ Data tables summarizing sampling results and figures depicting final sample locations
¦ Discussion of potential risk based on comparison of analytical results to applicable
screening levels/standards
¦ Preliminary recommendations for additional work, if needed, to continue/complete the
characterization to provide adequate information for USEPA to make a protectiveness
determination
g:\projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\work plans\labounty\rtc rev final\final rev labounty work plan (08242016).docx
. Golder
Associates
-------
August 2016
31
165-2829
10.0 REFERENCES
MHE Products 2003. Sampling will be conducted consistent with the PushPoint Sampler (US Pat.
#6,470,967) Operator's Manual and Applications Guide.
Golder 2003A. Procedure No. 31 Surface Water Sampling. January 23, 2003.
Golder 2003B. Procedure No. 18 Sediment Sampling. January 23, 2003.
Golder 201 OA. Suggested Operating Procedure No. 1: Soil Gas Probe Installation. September 2010.
Golder 2010B. Suggested Operating Procedure No. 2: Soil Gas Sampling. September 2010.
IDNR 2007. Arsenic Human Health Criteria Issues. August 8, 2007.
http://www.iowadnr.aov/portals/idnr/uploads/water/standards/files/k arsenic.pdf?amp;tabid=1308
USEPA2011. Exposure Factors Handbook: 2011 Edition. October 2011.
USEPA 2012. Memorandum "Clarifying the Use of Protectiveness Determinations for Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act Five-Year Reviews." September 13, 2012.
USEPA 2015a. Fifth 5-Year Review Report for the LaBounty Site, Charles City, Floyd County, Iowa. July
22, 2015.
USEPA 2015b. Third 5-Year Review Report for the Shaw Avenue Dump Site, Charles City, Floyd County,
Iowa. August 2015.
USEPA 2016. Regional Screening Levels (RSLs) for Superfund. May 2016.
g:\projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\worfc plans\labounty\rtc rev finaltfinal rev labounty work plan (08242016).docx
Associates
Golder
-------
August 2016 Table 1 165-2829
Project Personnel
LaBounty Landfill Site
Charles City, Iowa
USEPA Region 7 Project Manager:
Ms. Elizabeth Hagenmaier
11201 Renner Blvd.
Lenexa, KS 66219
913-551-7939
Environmental Liability and Transactions Leader
Zoetis LLC
Ms. Briana Sye Marvuglio
100 Campus Drive
P.O. Box 651
Florham Park, NJ 07932
973-443-2806
Golder Project Director:
Mr. P. Stephen Finn
200 Century Parkway, Suite C
Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054
(856) 793-2005
Golder Project Manager
Mr. Andrew Joslyn
200 Century Parkway, Suite C
Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054
(856) 793-2005
Golder Task Manager
Ms. Samantha Battle
200 Century Parkway, Suite C
Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054
(856) 793-2005
Golder Quality Assurance (QA) Coordinator
Ms. Kristin Nuriye
200 Century Parkway, Suite C
Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054
(856) 793-2005
Golder Health and Safety Coordinator
Mr. Kevin Dunsmore
200 Century Parkway, Suite C
Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054
(856) 793-2005
Golder Field Personnel Contact
To be determined
TestAmerica Project Manager
Ms. Carrie Gamber
301 Alpha Drive
RIDC Park
Pittsburgh, PA 15238
(412) 963-2428
Brooks Applied Labs Project Manager
Ms. Tiffany Stilwater
18804 North Creek Parkway, Suite 100
Bothell, WA 98011
(206) 632-6206
Checked by: SLB 6/21/2016
G:\PROJECTS\2016 Projects\1652829 - Zoetis Charles City\200 Reports\Work Plans\LaBounty\RTC Rev Final\Tables\Tables 1-5.xlsx ¦ Goldcr
8/24/2016 Page 1 of 1 ^2^AsSOCiateS
-------
August 2016 Table 2 165-2829
Sampling and Analytical Summary
LaBounty Landfill Site
Charles City, Iowa
Area / Purpose
Environmental
Medium
Analysis Timeframe
Number
Locations
Number
Samples
Basis for Number of Samples
Analytical Parameters
Immediate
6
6
1 sample at each of the primary 6 locations
Total & filtered As & Fe, TOC, DOC,
hardness, As speciation
Surface Water
Hold
up to 11
up to 16
up to 2 samples (multiple depths) at each of the 5 locations
not initially analyzed, plus a potential second sample at
each of the first 6 locations
Total & filtered As & Fe, TOC, DOC,
hardness, As speciation
Cedar River
Sediment
Immediate
6
6
1 sample (upper 6 inches) at each of the primary 6
locations
As, TOC, grain size, pH, ORP,
sulfates/sulfides
Hold
up to 8
up to 8
1 sample at each of the 5 locations not immediately
analyzed, plus second sample (multiple depths) at any 3
locations
As, TOC, grain size, pH, ORP,
sulfates/sulfides
Pore Water
Immediate
6
6
1 sample at each of the primary 6 locations
Total & filtered As & Fe, TOC, DOC,
hardness, pH
Hold
up to 5
up to 5
1 sample at each of up to 5 locations not immediately
analyzed
Total & filtered As & Fe, TOC, DOC,
hardness, pH
Vapor Intrusion Evaluation
Soil Gas
Immediate
7
7
1 sample at each of the 7 locations
Select VOCs (See Table 4C)
Notes:
1. The methodologies that will be used for analysis are listed in Table 3.
2. Quality control samples will be collected per matrix at the following frequency : 1 field duplicate per twenty primary samples; 1 MS/MSD pair per twenty primary samples; 1 rinsate blank per twenty
samples per type of decontamination event where non-dedicated equipment is used.
3. Number of samples is approximate. Actual number of samples may vary based on Site access and field conditions.
4. As speciation refers to As (III) and As (V).
Abbreviations:
As - Arsenic
DOC - Dissolved Organic Carbon
Fe - Iron
ORP - Oxidation Reduction Potential
TOC - Total Organic Carbon
VOCs - Volatile Organic Compounds
G.\PROJECTS\2016 Projects\1652829 - Zoetis Charles City\200 Reports\Work Plans\LaBounty\RTC Rev Final\Tables\Tables 1-5 xlsx
8/24/2016
Page 1 of 1
Checked by: SLB 6/21/2016
t^pGolder
Associates
-------
August 2016 165-2829
Table 3
Sample Methods, Containers. Preservation, and Hold Times
LaBounty LandftU S4*
Charles City, Iowa
Parameter
Arwlyucji Method
Laboratory Performing
Contains
Minimum
P,-os«!v.vJon
Holding Tinn;
Aqueous Samples v -
Arsenic, Total and Dissolved
SWIMS 6020A
TestAmerica Pensacola
or Brooks Applied
500 ml polyethylene
bottle
250 mL
HN03, pH<2, < 6°C
180 days
iron, Total and Dissolved
SW846 6020A
TestAmerica Pensacola
500 mL polyethylene
bottle
250 mL
HN03, pH<2, < 6"C
180 days
Total Organic Cartoon
SM 5310C
TestAmerica Pensacola
250 mL polyethylene
bottle
125 mL
HCI, pH<2, < 6°C
28 days
Dissolved Organic Carbon
S M 5310C
TestAmerica Pensacola
250 mL polyethylene
bottle
125 mL
HCI. pH<2, < 6°C
28 days
Hardness
SM 2340C
TestAmerica Pensacola
100 mL polyethylene
bottle
50 mL
H2S04 or HN03, pH<2, < 6°C
6 months
PH
SW846 9045D
TestAmerica Pensacola
250 mL polyethylene
bottle
125 mL
None
As soon as feasible after receipt by
laboratory
Arsenic Speciation (As [ill] and As M)
IC-SCP-CRC-MS
(BAL4100)
Brooks Applied
2 x 6 mL Vacutainer
12 mL
Field filiation, EDTA minimal
headspace. keep dark, < 6°C
14 days
Sediment Samples
Arsenic, Total
SW846 6020A
TestAmerica Pittsburgh or
Brooks Applied
8 oz. clear wide mouth
glass jar
8oz.
<6"C
180 days
Total Organic Carbon
Lloyd Kahn
TestAmerica Pittsburgh
4 oz. amber wide
mouth glass jar
4 oz.
<6°C
14 days
Grain Size {Sieve and Hydrometer)
ASTM 0422
TestAmerica Pittsburgh
Gallon sized plastic
zip-top bag
300 g
<6°C
Not specifided
pH
SW846 9045D
TestAmerica Pittsburgh
8 oz, clear wide mouth
Glass jar
8oz.
< 6*C
As soon as feasible after receipt by
laboratory
Oxidation Reduction Potential
SM 2580B
TestAmerica Pittsburgh
4 oz. clear wide mouth
glass jar
4oz.
< 6°C
28 days
Sulfate
SW846 9056A
TestAmerica Pittsburgh
4 oz. clear wide mouth
glass jar
4 oz.
<6'C
28 days
Sulfide
SW846 9034
TestAmerica Pittsburgh
4 oz, clear wide mouth
glass jar
4 oz.
< 6°C
7 days
Percent Moisture
SM 2540G
TestAmerica Pittsburgh
4 oz, clear wide mouth
glass iar
4oz.
< 6°C
Not regulated
Arsenic Speciation (As (III] and As (Vj)
IC-ICP-CRC-MS
(BAL 4100)
Brooks Applied
4 oz, glass or plastic
wide mouth jar
4 oz.
If possible, place on dry ice or freeze
immediately following collection.
Otherwise, maintain a temperature of
< 6°C following collection and during
shipping, and ship ASAP (within 48
hours) to the lab; store at -15 °C,
7 days to freeze; 1 year to analyze
Soil Gas Samples
Select VOCs {See Table AC)
TO-15
TestAmerica Burlington
Summa canister
6 L
None
30 days
Notes:
1) Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste - Physical/Chemical Methods, SW-846, available from http://www.epa. govfosw/hazard/testmethods/sw846/online/
2) Standard Methods for the Examination of Watarand Wastewater, $M, available from http://standardmethods.org/
3) Arsenic speciation testing is not anticipated for sediments, but the information is included herein in case this testing is performed in the future,
4) Samples for dissolved parameters will be laboratory filtered
Abbreviations:
EDTA - Ethytanediaminetetraaeetic Add
H2S04 - Sulfuric Add
HCI - Hydrochloric Acid
HN03 - Nitric Acid
VOCs - Volatile Organic Compounds
•C - Degrees Celsius
g - Grams
L - Liters
ml - Milliliters
oz, - Ounces
Checked by: LRM 6/21/201S
••wmaxvTKKm . ZoaBs Ms CitsOT mpoMWnfo PtansU*et«KWe Rev FimiVTaiteiTaWss Pag* 1 Of 1
-------
August 2016 Table 4A 165-2829
Analytical Sensitivity, Precision, and Accuracy Limits - Water
LaBounty Landfill Site
Charles City, Iowa
LCS
MS/MSD
MS/MSD
Analyte
CAS ID
Units
MDL
RL
% Recovery
Limits
% Recovery
Limits
RPD
Limit
Aqueous Samples
Arsenic, Total and Dissolved
7440-38-2
ug/L
0.460
1.25
80-120
75-125
20
Iron, Total and Dissolved
7439-89-6
ug/L
53.0
125
80-120
75-125
20
Total Organic Carbon
7440-44-0
mg/L
0.500
1.00
80-120
76-117
16
Dissolved Organic Carbon
7440-44-0
mg/L
0,500
1.00
80-120
76-117
16
Hardness
NA
mg/L
0.913
1.20
NA
NA
NA
pH
NA
SU
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Arsenic (III)
22541-54-4
ug/L
0.002
0.020
NA
75-125
25
Arsenic (V)
61805-96-7
ug/L
0.002
0.020
NA
75-125
25
Notes:
1) The QC Limits provided are based on information provided by TestAmerica and Brooks Applied on May 12, 2016
2) Laboratories routinely evaluate QC limits in accordance with their quality assurance manual and NELAC requirements. The
QC limits in place at the time of sample analysis will be used to evaluate data quality.
Abbreviations:
CAS ID - Chemical Abstracts Service Identification
LCS - Laboratory Control Sample
MDL - Method Detection Limit
MS/MSD - Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate
NA - Not Applicable
RL - Reporting Limit
RPD - Relative Percent Difference
Checked by: LRM 6/21/2016
G:\PROJECTS\2Q16 ProjectsM652829 - Zoeiis Charles City\200 ReportsVWork PIans\LaBounty\RTC Rev F inalYTabiesYTables 1~5.3dsx , . f mMST Goidter
s/24/2016 Page i or i Associates
-------
August 2016 T aW® 4B 168-2829
Analytical Sensitivity, Precision, and Accuracy Limits - Sediment
LaBounty Landfill Site
Charles City, Iowa
Analyte
CAS ID
Units
MDL
RL
LCS
% Recovery
Limits.
MS/MSD |
% Recovery ;
Limits I
MS/MSD
RPD
Limit
Arsenic, Total
7440-38-2
mg/kg
0.00905
0.0500
80-120
75-125
25
Total Organic Carbon
7440-44-0
mg/kg
500
1000
75-125
75-125
20
Grain Size (Sieve and Hydrometer)
NA
% passing
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
pH
NA
su
NA
0.100
99-101
NA
NA
Oxidation Reduction Potential
NA
mV
NA
10.0
NA
NA
NA
Sulfate
14808-79-8
mg/kg
1.18
10.0
80-120
80-120
15
Sulfide
18496-25-8
mg/kg
6.00
30.0
85-115
75-125
20
Percent Moisture
NA
%
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Arsenic (III)
22541-54-4
mq/kg
See Note 3
NA
70-130
30
Arsenic (V)
61805-96-7
9
See Note 3
0.05
NA
70-130
30
Notes:
1) The QC Limits provided are based on information provided by TestAmerica and Brooks Applied on May 12, 2016.
2) Laboratories routinely evaluate QC limits in accordance with their quality assurance manual and NELAC requirements. The QC limits in
place at the time of sample analysis will be used to evaluate data quality,
3) Brooks Applied calculated MDLs for arsenic speciation sediment samples on a batch-specific basis as the standard deviation between
method blanks.
Abbreviations:
CAS ID - Chemical Abstracts Service Identification
LCS - Laboratory Control Sample
MDL - Method Detection Limit
MS/MSD - Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate
NA - Not Applicable
RL - Reporting Limit
RPD - Relative Percent Difference
G.\PROJECTS\20t8 Projects\1652829 - Zoet>s Cbarkw Crty\20C ReportsVWortc P}ans\LaBounty\RTC Rev FinaJVTaMMVTaMw vS.xlw D , H
*24/2016 rage i 01 i
Checked by: LHM 6/21/2016
(3fcsite«,
-------
August 2016 Table 4C 165-2829
Analytical Sensitivity, Precision, and Accuracy Limits - Soil Gas
LaBounty Landfill Site
Charles City. Iowa
Compound
CAS ID
Units
MDL
RL
LCS
% Recovery
Limits
Soil Gas Samples
1,1.2-T richloroethane
79-00-5
ppb v/v
0.01
0,01
69-129
1,1-Dichloroethane
75-34-3
ppb v/v
0.01
0.01
66-126
1,1-Dichloroethene
75-35-4
ppb v/v
0.01
0.01
67-127
1,2-Dichloroethane
107-06-2
ppb v/v
0 02
0.02
67-132
Benzene
71-43-2
ppb v/v
0,01
0,01
67-127
Chloroform
67-66-3
ppb v/v
0.01
0.01
69-129
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
156-59-2
ppb v/v
0.01
0.01
67-127
Tetrachloroethene
127-18-4
ppb v/v
0.01
0.01
70-130
Trichloroethene
79-01-6
ppb v/v
0.01
0.01
68-128
Vinyl Chloride
75-01-4
ppb v/v
0.02
0,02
62-125
Notes:
1) The QC Limits provided are based on information provided by TestAmerica on May 12, 2016
2) Laboratories routinely evaluate QC limits in accordance with their quality assurance manual
and NELAC requirements The QC limits in place at the time of sample analysis will be used to
Abbreviations:
MDL - Method Detection Limit
RL - Reporting Limit
LCS - Laboratory Control Sample
Checked by: LRM 6/21/2016
G:\PROJECTS\2016 Projects\1652829 - Zoetis Charles City\200 Reports\Work P!ans\La8ounty\RTC Rev Fina!\Tables\
Tables l-5.xlsx Page 1 of 1
-------
August 2016 Table 5A 165-2829
Measurement and Performance Criteria - Water
LaBounty Landfill Site
Charles City, Iowa
Matrix
Water
-
Analytical Group
Metals, General Chemisty
Analytical Method
See Table 3
Analytical Organization
TestAmerica, Brooks Applied
QC Sample
Frequency/ Number
Method/SOP QC
Acceptance Limits
Corrective Action
Person(s) Responsible for
Corrective Action
Person(s)
Responsible for
Corrective Action
Measurement
Performance Criteria
Method Blank
1 per extraction batch
No results above QL
If sufficient sample volume is
available, reanalyze the
samples.
Laboratory Analyst
Accuracy
No results above QL
Method Blank
1 per extraction batch
None
Qualify data as required
Golder Associates Data
Quality Reviewer
Accuracy
No results above QL
Equipment Rinsate Blank
1 per 20 samples,
whenever field
decontaminated
equipment is used.
None
Qualify data as required
Golder Associates Data
Quality Reviewer
Accuracy
No results above QL
Field Duplicates
1 per 20 samples
None
Qualify data as required
Golder Associates Data
Quality Reviewer
Precision
<40% RPD
LCS
1 per analytical shift
Meets laboratory QC limits
as defined in Table 4A.
Analysis terminated and
affected samples reanalyzed, if
additional sample volume is
available.
Laboratory Analyst
Accuracy
Meets analytical method
criteria.
LCS
1 per analytical shift
Meets laboratory QC limits
as defined in Table 4A.
Qualify data as required.
Golder Associates Data
Quality Reviewer
Accuracy
Meets analytical method
criteria.
Matrix Spike
1 per 20 samples
Meets laboratory QC limits
as defined in Table 4A.
If the LCS meets acceptance
criteria, no corrective action is
required. Otherwise, if
sufficient sample volume is
available, re-extract and
reanalyze the samples.
Laboratory Analyst
Accuracy
Meets analytical method
criteria.
Matrix Spike
1 per 20 Samples
Meets laboratory QC limits
as defined in Table 4A.
Qualify data as required.
Golder Associates Data
Quality Reviewer
Accuracy
Meets analytical method
criteria.
Matrix Spike Duplicate
1 per 20 samples
Meets laboratory QC limits
as defined in Table 4A.
If the LCS meets acceptance
criteria, no corrective action is
required. Otherwise, if
sufficient sample volume is
available, re-extract and
reanalyze the samples.
Laboratory Analyst
Precision
Meets analytical method
criteria.
Matrix Spike Duplicate
1 per 20 Samples
Meets laboratory QC limits
as defined in Table 4A.
Qualify data as required.
Golder Associates Data
Validator
Precision
Meets analytical method
criteria.
Lab Duplicate
1 per 20 samples.
±20% of true value, ± RL
when the sample value is <
5x RL, including when only
one of the duplicate sample
values is < 5x RL.
If sufficient sample volume is
available, reanalyze the
samples.
Laboratory Analyst
Accuracy
±20% of true value, ± RL
when the sample value is <
5x RL, including when only
one of the duplicate sample
values is < 5x RL.
G \PROJECTS\2016 Projects\1652829 - Zoetis Charles City\200 ReportsVWork Plans\LaBounty\RTC R«v Final\Tables\Tables l-5.xls*
8/24/2016
Checked by: LRM 6/21/2016
Page.1 of 2 ^^P^Associates
-------
August 2016 Table 5A 165-2829
Measurement and Performance Criteria - Water
LaBounty Landfill Site
Charles City, Iowa
Matrix
Water
Analytical Group
Metals, General Chemisty
Analytical Method
See Table 3
Analytical Organization
TestAmerica, Brooks Applied
Lab Duplicate
1 per 20 samples.
±20% of true value, ± RL
when the sample value is <
5x RL, including when only
one of the duplicate sample
values is < 5x RL.
Qualify data as required.
Golder Associates Data
Quality Reviewer
Accuracy
±20% of true value, ± RL
when the sample value is <
5x RL, including when only
one of the duplicate sample
values is < 5x RL.
ICP Serial Dilution
When warranted.
When analyte concentration
is minimally a factor of 50
above the IDL, an analysis
of a 5-fold dilution must
agree within 10% difference
of the original results.
If sufficient sample volume is
available, reanalyze the
samples.
Laboratory Analyst
Precision
When analyte concentration
is minimally a factor of 50
above the IDL, an analysis
of a 5-fold dilution must
agree within 10% difference
of the original results.
ICP Serial Dilution
When warranted.
When analyte concentration
is minimally a factor of 50
above the IDL, an analysis
of a 5-fold dilution must
agree within 10% difference
of the original results.
Qualify data as required.
Golder Associates Data
Quality Reviewer
Precision
When analyte concentration
is minimally a factor of 50
above the IDL, an analysis
of a 5-fold dilution must
agree within 10% difference
of the original results.
Abbreviations:
ICP - Inductively Coupled Plasma
IDL - Instrument Detection Limit
LCS - Laboratory Control Sample
QC - Quality Control
QL - Quantitation Limit
RL - Reporting Limit
RPD - Relative Percent Difference
G.\PROJECTS\2016 Projec1s\1652029 • Zoetis Charles City\200 Reports\Work Plans\LaBounty\RTC Rev Final\Tables\Tables 1-5.xlsx
8/24/2016
Page 2 of 2
Checked by: LRM 6/21/2016
Golder
M/ Associates
-------
August 2016 Table 5B . 165-2829
Measurement Performance Criteria - Sediment
LaBounty Landfill Site
Charles City, Iowa
Matrix
Sediment
Analytical Group
Metals, General Chemisty
Analytical Method
See Table 3
Analytical Organization
TestAmerica, Brooks Applied
QC Sample
Frequency/ Number
Method/SOP QC
Acceptance Limits
Corrective Action
Person(s) Responsible for
Corrective Action
Person(s)
Responsible for
Corrective Action
Measurement
Performance Criteria
Method Blank
1 per extraction batch
No results above QL
If sufficient sample volume is
available, reanalyze the
samples.
Laboratory Analyst
Accuracy
No results above QL
Method Blank
1 per extraction batch
None
Qualify data as required
Golder Associates Data
Quality Reviewer
Accuracy
No results above QL
Equipment Rinsate Bjank
1 per 20 samples'
whenever field
decontaminated
equipment is used.
None
Qualify data as required
Golder Associates Data
Quality Reviewer
Accuracy
No results above QL
Field Duplicates
1 per 20 samples
None
Qualify data as required
Golder Associates Data
Quality Reviewer
Precision
<80% RPD
LCS
1 per analytical shift
Meets laboratory QC limits
as defined in Table 4B.
Analysis terminated and
affected samples reanalyzed, if
additional sample volume is
available.
Laboratory Analyst
Accuracy
Meets analytical method
criteria.
LCS
1 per analytical shift
Meets laboratory QC limits
as defined in Table 4B.
Qualify data as required.
Golder Associates Data
Quality Reviewer
t Accuracy
Meets analytical method
criteria.
Matrix Spike
1 per 20 samples
Meets laboratory QC limits
as defined in Table 4B.
If the LCS meets acceptance
criteria, no corrective action is
required. Otherwise, if
sufficient sample volume is
available, re-extract and
reanalyze the samples.
Laboratory Analyst
Accuracy
Meets analytical method
criteria.
Matrix Spike
1 per 20 Samples
Meets laboratory QC limits
as defined in Table 4A.
Qualify data as required.
Golder Associates Data
Quality Reviewer
Accuracy
Meets analytical method
criteria.
Matrix Spike Duplicate
1 per 20 samples
Meets laboratory QC limits
as defined in Table 4B.
If the LCS meets acceptance
criteria, no corrective action is
required. Otherwise, if
sufficient sample volume is
available, re-extract and
reanalyze the samples.
Laboratory Analyst
Precision
Meets analytical method
criteria.
Matrix Spike Duplicate
1 per 20 Samples
Meets laboratory QC limits
as defined in Table 4B.
Qualify data as required.
Golder Associates Data
Quality Reviewer
Precision
Meets analytical method
criteria.
Lab Duplicate
1 per 20 samples.
±20% of true value, ± RL
when the sample value is <
5x RL, including when only
one of the duplicate sample
values is < 5x RL.
If sufficient sample volume is
available, reanalyze the
samples.
Laboratory Analyst
Accuracy
±20% of true value, ± RL
when the sample value is <
5x RL, including when only
one of the duplicate sample
values is < 5x RL.
G:\PROJECTS\2016 Projects\1652829 - Zoetis Charles City\200 ReportsVWoik Plans\LaBounty\RTC Rev FinalMablesMables 1-5.x1sx
8/24/2016
Page 1 of 2
Checked by: LRM 6/21/2016
Golder
Associates
-------
August 2016 Table 5B 165-2829
Measurement Performance Criteria - Sediment
LaBounty Landfill Site
Charles City, Iowa
Matrix
Sediment
Analytical Group
Metals, General Chemisty
Analytical Method
See Table 3
Analytical Organization
TestAmerica, Brooks Applied
Lab Duplicate
1 per 20 samples.
±20% of true value, ± RL
when the sample value is <
5x RL, including when only
one of the duplicate sample
values is < 5x RL.
Qualify data as required.
Golder Associates Data
Quality Reviewer
Accuracy
±20% of true value, ± RL
when the sample value is <
5x RL, including when only
one of the duplicate sample
values is < 5x RL.
ICP Serial Dilution
When warranted.
When analyte concentration
is minimally a factor of 50
above the IDL, an analysis
of a 5-fold dilution must
agree within 10% difference
of the original results.
If sufficient sample volume is
available, reanalyze the
samples.
Laboratory Analyst
Precision
When analyte concentration
is minimally a factor of 50
above the IDL, an analysis
of a 5-fold dilution must
agree within 10% difference
of the original results.
ICP Serial Dilution
When warranted.
When analyte concentration
is minimally a factor of 50
above the IDL, an analysis
of a 5-fold dilution must
agree within 10% difference
of the original results.
Qualify data as required.
Golder Associates Data
Quality Reviewer
Precision
When analyte concentration
is minimally a factor of 50
above the IDL, an analysis
of a 5-fold dilution must
agree within 10% difference
of the original results.
Abbreviations:
ICP - Inductively Coupled Plasma
IDL - Instrument Detection Limit
LCS - Laboratory Control Sample
QC - Quality Control
QL - Quantitation Limit
RL - Reporting Limit
RPD - Relative Percent Difference
G.\PROJECTS\2016 Projects\1652829 - Zoetis Charles City\200 Reports\Work P!an*\LaBounty\RTC Rev FinaMablesMables 1-5.xlsx
8/24/2016
Page 2 of 2
Checked by: J.RM 6/21/2016
(UsSfe*
-------
August 2016 Table 5C 165-2829
Measurement Performance Criteria - Soil Gas
LaBounty Landfill Site
Charles City, Iowa
Matrix
Air
Analytical Group
VOCs
Analytical Method
TO-15
Analytical Organization
TestAmerica
QC Sample
Frequency/ Number
Method/SOP QC
Acceptance Limits
Corrective Action
Person(s) Responsible for
Corrective Action
Person(s)
Responsible for
Corrective Action
Measurement
Performance Criteria
Method Blank
1 per extraction batch
No results above QL
If sufficient sample volume is
available, reanalyze the
samples.
Laboratory Analyst
Accuracy
No results above QL
Method Blank
1 per extraction batch
None
Qualify data as required
Golder Associates Data
Quality Reviewer
Accuracy
No results above QL
Field Duplicates
1 per 20 samples
None
Qualify data as required
Golder Associates Data
Quality Reviewer
Precision
<40% RPD
LCS
1 per analytical shift
Meets laboratory QC limits
as defined in Table 4C.
Analysis terminated and
affected samples reanalyzed, if
additional sample volume is
available.
Laboratory Analyst
Accuracy -
Meets analytical method
criteria.
LCS
1 per analytical shift
Meets laboratory QC limits
as defined in Table 4C.
Qualify data as required.
Golder Associates Data
Quality Reviewer
Accuracy
Meets analytical method
criteria.
Abbreviations:
LCS - Laboratory Control Sample
QC - Quality Control
QL - Quantitation Limit
RPD - Relative Percent Difference
Checked by: LRM 6/21/2016
G:\PROJECTS\2016 ProjectsU 652829 - Zoetis Charles City\200 Reports\Work Plans\LaBounty\RTC Rev Final\Tabl®s\Tables 1-5.xls*
8/24/2016
Page 1 of 1
, Golder
'Associates
-------
August 2016 Table 6 165-2829
Cedar River Arsenic Screening Levels and Risk Based Concentrations
LaBounty Landfill Site
Charles City, Iowa
Media
Ecological
Human Health
Screening Value
Source
Screening Value
Source
Surface Water
150 ug/L
Iowa Water Quality Standard
(WQS) for aquatic life
50 ug/L (2>
Iowa WQS for human health (based on
fish consumption)
122 ug/L
Site-specific (See Appendix E for
exposure values)
Pore Water
150 ug/L
Iowa WQS (focus on toxicity for
infaunal benthic species)<1)
Not Applicable
Sediment
5,900 mg/kg
Dutch Permissible
Concentration for Sediment
(RIVM report 711701 023)
47 mg/kg
Site-specific (See Appendix E for
exposure values)
33 mg/kg
PEC from NOAA SQuiRTs
Note:
1. If pore water concentrations exceed the Iowa WQS, a refined screening level may be developed focused on infaunal species toxicity values only.
2. The Iowa WQS will be used as the primary human health screening value for surface water as this is protective of the Site-specific incidental surface
water ingestion exposure.
G:\PROJECTS\2016 Projects\1652829 - Zoetis Charles City\200 Reports\Work Plans\LaBounty\RTC Rev Finaf\Tables\Table 6_LaBourrty ,*ls*
8/19/2016
Page 1 of 1
Checked by: SLB 6/21/2016
(f^Golder
>£/ Associates
-------
August 2016 Table 7 165-2829
Vapor Intrusion Evaluation Screening Levels
LaBounty Landfill Site
Charles City, Iowa
Chemical
Sub-Slab Soil Gas
Screening Level (ug/m3)
1,1,2-trichloroethane
29
1,1-dichloroethene
29333
1,2-dichloroethane
157
benzene
533
chloroform
177
cis-1,2-dichloroethene
Not Available
tetrachloroethene
6000
trichloroethene
200
vinyl chloride
933
Note:
1. At USEPA's request, screening levels were
determined using the lesser Regional Screening Level
(RSL) of either cancer risk level 1E-05 or the non-
cancer Hazard Index of 1.0, and dividing by an
attenuation factor of 0.03. Also at USEPA's request a
screening value of 200 ug/m3 was used for the
trichloroethene, instead of calculating the screening
value using the current RSL.
Checked by: KSG (8/19/2016)
G:\PROJECTS\2016 Projects\1652829 - Zoetis Charles City\200 Reports\Work Plans\leBounty\RTC Rev Final\Tabies\TableiSjidax _ a r a 1 Golder
6/i9/2oi6 Page 1 of 1 Associates
-------
Riverside
10THAVE'
Su*>erv
Bridge
9TH AVE'
¦87HAVE
'GROVE ST
SITE LOCATION
Calvary-
"Cem i
REFERENCE(S)
1. BASE TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS FROM 7.5 MINUTE U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLES OF CHARLES CITY,
IOWA DATED 2015.
CLIENT PROJECT
ZOETIS LABOUNTY LANDFILL SITE WORK PLAN
CONSULTANT YYYY-MM-DD 2016-06-30 TITLE
NJ Authorization 024GA28029100
DESIGNED
SLB
PREPARED
CW
REVIEWED
SLB
SITE LOCATION MAP
^4^ Associates REVIEWED SLB project NO. control rev. figure
approved apj 1652829 1652829A005 0 1
-------
s
i
>
?
i
¦:
5
|
r
•J
I RECREATIONAL CAMPGROUND PROPERTY
[CR16*t!08]
[CR16?tl07j
[CRl'6?ll0jt|
[CR16-Lr03]
LABOUNTY LANDFILL SITEI
[CR16lLr0j]
ISHAW AVENUE DUMP SITE
LEGEND
O EXISTING CEDAR RIVER MONITORING STATION
EXISTING GROUNDWATER MONITORING V«U
O PROPOSED LABOUNTY SITE CEDAR RIVER PRIMARY SAMPLE LOCATION
^ PROPOSED LABOUNTY SITE CEDAR RIVER CONTINGENT SAMPLE LOCATION
O PROPOSED SHAW SITE CEDAR RIVER SAMPLE LOCATION (SEE NOTE 1)
DIVERSION WALL
| | LABOUNTY LANDFILL SITE BOUNDARY
tza LANDFILL
RECREATIONAL CAMPGROUND PROPERTY BOUNDARY
|_J SHAW AVENUE DUMP SITE
FORMER CHEMICAL FlU. AREA
CEDAR RIVER FLOW DIRECTION
NOTE(S)
1. THE PROPOSED CEDAR RIVER SAMPLE LOCATIONS FOR THE SHAW AVENUE DUMP SITE
ARE ALSO SHOWN ON THIS FIGURE TO PROVIDE CONTEXT.
REFERENCE^)
1. AERIAL FROM ESRIARCGIS ONLINE.
PROJECT
LABOUNTY LANDFILL SITE WORK PLAN
TITLE
PROPOSED SAMPLE LOCATIONS FOR ARSENIC EVALUATION
CONSULTANT
<&
. Golder
Associates
FIGURE
2
-------
CLIENT
ZOETIS
PROJECT
LABOUNTY LANDFILL SHE WORK PLAN
TfTLE
PROPOSED SAMPLE LOCATIONS FOR
VAPOR INTRUSION EVALUATION
, Golder
Associates
LEGEND
EXISTING GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL
^ PROPOSED SUB-SLAB VAPOR SAMPLE LOCATION
— DIVERSION WALL
^_J LABOUNTY LANDFILL SITE BOUNDARY
\zz LANDFILL
-------
APPENDIX A
VAPOR INTRUSION REFERENCE FIGURES
-------
FIGURE 8
REMEDIAL WORK AND MONITORING SYSTEMS CONSTRUCTION REPORT (CRA, 1986)
(SHOWING STORM SEWER LINE IN THE VICINITY OF THE LABOUNTY SITE)
-------
(/>
o
c
o
31
>
2
O
>
<
m
z
c
m
o 50 too' 20a
c
U)
X
-<
fO
CD
CRA
PROPERTY LINE
LIMIT Of fXJPOSEO WASTE
AS (XNTIFIEO *1 ¦ORlHIlS
A NO ftALSSURY PERSONNEL
STORM SEWEH (EXISTUM)
APPROXIMATE AN!A USED FOR
STOCKPILINO OP TOPSOIL
•AMD AND CLAY
APPROXIMATE AREA Of
OVERBURDEN C XC AVA T ION
APPROXIMATE AREA FOR
STOCKPIIINO SILT/CLAY BACKHll
AND BEDROCK
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF
BEDROCK EXCAVATION
figure 8
EXCAVATION/STOCKPILE AREAS
LaBounty Disposal Site
-------
CHARLES CITY UTILITIES FIGURE
PROVIDED BY CITY ENGINEER, JOHN FALLIS ON JUNE 10, 2016
(SHOWING UTILITIES IN THE VICINITY OF THE LABOUNTY SITE)
i
-------
CHARLES CITY,
City Utilities
June 2016
Sanitary Pipe
Storm Main
Water Main
-------
APPENDIX B
FIELD SAMPLING PROCEDURES
-------
APPENDIX B
FIELD SAMPLING
PROCEDURES
LaBounty Landfill Site
Charles City, Iowa
Prepared By: Golder Associates Inc.
200 Century Parkway, Suite C
Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054
August 2016
A world of
capabilities
delivered locally
Golder, Golder Associates and the GA globe design are trademarks of Golder Associates Corporation
-------
August 2016 B-i 165-2829
Table of Contents
1.0 FIELD DOCUMENTATION 1
1.1 Field Books 1
1.2 Changes in Procedure 2
1.3 Instrument Calibration Forms 3
1.4 Chain of Custody Forms 3
2.0 CALIBRATION 4
3.0 DECONTAMINATION 5
3.1.1 Field Parameter Meters 5
3.1.2 Surface Water and Sediment Sampling Equipment (Non-Dedicated) 5
4.0 SAMPLE HANDLING AND CUSTODY REQUIREMENTS 7
4.1 Sample Handling 7
4.2 Sample Preservation 7
4.3 Sample Identification 7
4.3.1 Nomenclature 7
4.4 Sample Custody 8
4.4.1 Field Sample Custody 8
4.4.2 Laboratory Custody 10
5.0 INVESTIGATION DERIVED WASTE 11
g:\projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\work plans\Jabounty\rtc rev finatappendix b_fsp\final rev appendix b labounty fsp
HFGolder
(08242016).docx
Associates
-------
August 2016
B-1
165-2829
1.0 FIELD DOCUMENTATION
As part of documentation of field activities it is necessary to document all pertinent information and data
collected during the field activity in a field log book. Documentation must also be maintained to trace the
possession and handling of samples from the time of collection through transfer to the courier, and for proof
of instrument calibration.
Documentation can take many forms, and may include sample labels, sample seals, field log books, field
information forms, chain of custody records, sample analysis request forms, and laboratory sample logs.
The following procedures and protocols will be followed.
-The analytical laboratories will keep project files containing relevant and appropriate project sample
information for a minimum of five years. This sample information includes, but is not limited to the following
items:
1. Chain-of-custody (COC) records
2. Sample log-in information (if applicable)
3. Copies of laboratory sheets
4. Pertinent correspondence memoranda
5. Final report file
Golder Associates Inc. (Golder) will retain relevant and appropriate project information including, but not
necessarily limited to, the following items:
1. COC records
2. Field notes and information
3. Correspondence and telephone memoranda
4. Meeting notes
5. Laboratory information
6. Data evaluation information
7. Reference information
8. Audit information
9. Copies of reports
The log book must be bound, numbered, and water resistant. The cover of the book will have, at a minimum,
the project name and number. The company name, office address, and phone number should be marked
inside the cover, or a business card may be attached to provide this information.
1.1 Field Books
g;\projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\work plansUabountyttc rev final\appendix b_fsp\final rev appendix b labounty fsp
(08242016) docx
>f Golder
Associates
-------
B-2
165-2829
All pertinent field activities occurring during the work day must be documented in the field book on a daily
basis with permanent ink; pencil or felt tip pens are not acceptable. Notations shall be made in log book
fashion, noting the time and date of all entries. When filling out a log book, the pages should be numbered
sequentially. The person responsible for completing the field log book must place his/her initials, the date
and the project number at the top of each page. The daily log should include but not be limited to the
following information:
¦ Date and Time of arrival and departure
¦ Weather conditions on site
¦ Name and affiliation of persons on-site
¦ Name and affiliation of persons contacted
¦ Field instrument calibration time
¦ Indicate if any quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) samples were collected
¦ Method of sample collection
¦ Date and time of sample collection
¦ Observed or known potential factors that may affect sample quality
¦ All sample identification numbers
¦ Description of samples
¦ Discussion/explanation for any change to the approved scope of work
¦ Description of any problems or issues that arose during the field event
¦ Photographs taken, if any, including date, time, direction faced, description of subject or
activity, sequential number of the photo and film roll number will be recorded in the field
log book. The digital camera will be checked to ensure the correct date and time is recorded
for each photo.
Any deviations from the project scope of work, health and safety issues, or other information deemed
necessary must be recorded in the field book, and the project manager must be contacted.immediately. All
notations in the field book shall be objective. Errors shall be crossed out with a single line and initialed.
Personal opinions and comments must not be recorded in the field book. Once the event is completed all
project related field books will to be archived in the project file. All field notebooks will be photocopied so
that copies of field notes can be kept in appropriate project files. In some cases, a mobile GIS device or a
computer tablet will be used to collect relevant field information.
1.2 Changes in Procedure
Approval from the USEPA will be obtained as needed prior to implementation of any major changes in
sampling procedures as outlined in this Work Plan. Minor procedural changes may be made by Golder
personnel, and if present, with the concurrence of the on-site USEPA representative. All changes will be
documented in a field notebook.
g:\projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\v«rk plans\labounty\rtc rev final\appendix b_fsptfinal rev appendix b labounty fsp
(08242016).docx
DF Golder
Associates
-------
August 2016
B-3
165-2829
1.3 Instrument Calibration Forms
Instrument calibration documentation is required for surface water sampling following manufacturer
calibration methods (See Section 2.0).
A separate calibration log will be maintained for each instrument throughout the project. The instrument
model and unique serial number will be documented the first time the instrument is calibrated and updated
each time the instrument is calibrated. Calibration records shall include, at a minimum, the following:
¦ Calibrator's name
¦ Instrument name/model/serial number
¦ Date/time of calibration
¦ Standard(s) used and source
¦ Temperature
¦ Results of calibration (raw data and summary)
¦ Corrective actions taken
1.4 Chain of Custody Forms
When samples are collected for laboratory analysis, additional documentation procedures are required.
The COC form is intended as a legal record indicating the chain of possession of the sample. The COC
form is provided by the laboratory, updated during sample collection, and remains with the sample(s) at all
times. The name of the person assuming responsibility for the samples shall be recorded on the COC.
This person is tasked with ensuring secure and appropriate handling of the bottles and samples. When the
form is completed, it must indicate that there were no lapses in sample possession/accountability. In
addition, the COC will include sender information, recipient information, identification of samples by number,
sample location, time collected and requested analysis. All QA/QC samples shall be identified (e.g. trip
blanks, rinsate blanks, field duplicates, MS/MSD, etc.) on the COC.
g:\projects\2016 projects\1652629 - zoetis Charles city\200 reportswvork plans\Jabounty\rtc rev final\appendix b_fsp\final rev appendix b labounty fsp
(08242016).docx
-------
August 2016
B-4
165-2829
2.0 CALIBRATION
The calibration and maintenance of field instruments will be the responsibility of the field sampling team.
Field instruments, such as meters for measuring field parameters, will be standardized/calibrated in
accordance with the manufacturers' recommendations against National Institute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) traceable standards, where appropriate. During sampling, calibration checks will occur
at a minimum of two times each day (beginning of each day and at least every four hours of operation) and
occasionally evaluated for potential interferences (e.g., atmospheric and temperature changes). In addition,
prior to use, each major piece of equipment will be cleaned, decontaminated, checked for damage, and
repaired or replaced, if needed.
Calibration of the water quality meter will be performed in accordance with Golder Standard Operating
Procedures (SOPs) and manufacturer recommendations for temperature, specific conductance, pH, ORP,
turbidity, and DO.
Appropriate calibration records will be maintained in project field log books or on calibration log forms. The
field team leader is responsible for ensuring that calibrations are properly performed at the appropriate
frequency.
g:\projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\work plans\labounty\rtc rev final\appendix b_fsp\final rev appendix b labounty fsp
(06242016).docx
|F Golder
Associates
-------
B-5
165-2829
3.0 DECONTAMINATION
Decontamination procedures in this section are intended for use by field personnel for cleaning sampling
equipment in the field. Deviations from these procedures should be documented in the field records and
investigative reports. Specifications for standard decontamination materials follow. These materials will
be used, as appropriate, for non-dedicated equipment used during sample collection.
¦ Soap shall be a phosphate-free laboratory detergent such as Liquinox® or Alconox®. Use
of other detergent must be documented in the field log books and investigative reports.
¦ Tap water may be used from any municipal water treatment system. Use of an untreated
potable water supply is not an acceptable substitute for tap water.
¦ Distilled water is tap water that has been distilled. It is commercially available.
¦ Analvte free water is tap water that has been treated with activated carbon and a standard
deionizing resin column. At a minimum, the finished water should contain no constituents
above the laboratory reporting limits that are being analyzed for as part of the remedial
investigation.
¦ Nitric acid shall be trace-metal analysis grade or better. Nitric acid used to decontaminate
non-dedicated and sampling equipment shall be a 10 percent solution.
3.1.1 Field Parameter Meters
The following procedure will be used for all non-dedicated equipment used to collect water level
measurements and field parameter measurements.
1. Clean with tap water and soap using a brush to remove obvious particulate matter and
surface films
2., Rinse thoroughly with tap water
3. Rinse thoroughly with analyte free water
3.1.2 Surface Water and Sediment Sampling Equipment (Non-Dedicated)
Non-dedicated surface water and sediment sampling equipment will be decontaminated prior to sampling
each location. The non-dedicated equipment used during sample collection (e.g., dredge, stainless steel
bowls, spoon, etc.) will be decontaminated by the procedure described below.
1. Initial rub/rinse with tap water
2. Clean with tap water and detergent, using a brush to remove obvious particulate matter and
surface films
3. Rinse thoroughly with tap water
4. Rinse thoroughly with distilled water
5. Rinse equipment with a 10% nitric acid solution
6. Rinse thoroughly with distilled water
g:\projects\2016 projects\1652829
(08242016).docx
- zoetis charles city\200 reportstarork plansUabountyVtc rev final\appendix b_fsp\final rev appendix b labounty fsp
alFGolder
Associates
-------
7. Allow equipment to completely air dry
8. Wrap equipment in aluminum foil and/or place in plastic bags, if not using immediately or
transporting to sampling location
g:\projects\2016 proj$cts\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\work plansVabounty\rtc rev final\appendix b_fsp\final rev appendix b labounty fsp
(08242016).doc*
. Golder
Associates
-------
August 2016
B-7
165-2829
4.0 SAMPLE HANDLING AND CUSTODY REQUIREMENTS
4.1 Sample Handling
Appropriately cleaned and prepared sample containers will be supplied by the laboratory for collection of
analytical samples. Reagents, preservation procedures, and analytical holding times will be in accordance
with the published analytical methods and USEPA Region VII guidelines.
4.2 Sample Preservation
The specific requirements for sample container preparation, sample preservation, and holding times, and
any special sample handling requirements will be in accordance with analytical method requirements.
Sample containers will be kept closed until the time each set of sample containers are to be filled. After
filling, the containers will be securely closed, residue will be wiped from the sides of the containers, and the
containers will be immediately placed in a cooler if aqueous samples. Surface water, pore water, and
sediment samples will be kept chilled and will generally be shipped on the day of sample collection to the
laboratory.
Labeled sample containers will be placed in a cooler with frozen blue packs or wet ice as soon as practical
after collection and ice will be double bagged if the cooler is going to be shipped via a private shipping
company (i.e. FedEx or UPS).
4.3 Sample Identification
All samples shall be adequately marked for identification from the time of collection and packaging through
shipping and storage. Marking shall be on a sample label attached to the sample container. Sample
identification shall include, as a minimum:
¦ Project name and/or code
¦ Sample identification number
¦ Analysis requested
¦ Chemical preservatives added to the sample container
¦ Sample date and time (24-hour clock)
¦ Initials of the individual performing the sampling
Each sample will be assigned a unique sample identification number to be recorded on the sample label.
Each sample identification number will be recorded in the field log book, appropriate. Field Information
Forms and on COC Forms.
4.3.1 Nomenclature
Samples will be labeled according to the following convention:
g:\projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\work plans\labounty\rtc revfinal\appendix b_fsp\final rev appendix b labounty fsp
(08242016).docx
¦I- Golder
Associates
-------
August 2016
B-8
165-2829
AA16-BCC-DD-EE-FF
AA = "CR" (Cedar River) or "CP" (Campground Pond)
B = "L" (LaBounty Site) or "S" (Shaw Site) for Cedar River
B = "P" (Primary) or "C" (Contingent) for Campground Pond
CC = number starting from 01 at the farthest downstream location and numbering sequentially from
downstream to upstream
DD = "SW" (surface water), "PW" (pore water), or "SD" (sediment)
EE = starting depth of the sample (in feet), measured from the top of the surface water or sediment,
depending on media
FF = ending depth of the sample (in feet), measured from the top of the surface water or sediment (may
be the same as EE for surface water and pore water samples)
¦ Field duplicate samples will be "blind" and will have a sequential ID beginning with AA16-
BDUP-GG (where GG is a sequential number, starting with 01). The sampler will note in
the field book which locations field duplicate samples correspond with.
¦ Samples that are chosen for MS/MSD will be collected with triple volume, but the ID will
remain the same as the primary sample. The sampler will note on the COC that additional
volume was collected for MS/MSD analysis.
¦ Rinsate blanks - RBDD-mmddyy where mmddyy will be the month, day and year the
sample was collected. The type of equipment will be noted in the field log book.
4.4 Sample Custody
Samples are physical evidence collected from a facility or the environment. COC procedures have been
established to ensure sample traceability from the time of collection through completion of analysis. The
National Enforcement Investigations Center (NEIC) of USEPA considers a sample to be in custody under
the following conditions:
¦ It is in your possession
¦ It is in your view after being in your possession
¦ It was in your possession and you locked it up
¦ It is in a designated secure area
4.4.1 Field Sample Custody
All environmental samples will be handled under strict COC procedures beginning in the field. The following
procedure should be used to maintain COC of environmental samples.
Equipment
g:\projects\2016 projects\1652829
(08242016).docx
- zoetis Charles city\200 reportsV*ork plans\labounty\rtc rev finahappendix b_fsp\final rev appendix b labounty fsp
_ Golder
Associates
-------
August 2016 B-9 165-2829
The following equipment and materials are needed to perform COC procedures:
¦ COC Forms
¦ COC seals
¦ Permanent ink pen
¦ A secure (locked) vehicle or building
Procedures
Samples and sample containers must be kept under proper COC during field sampling. If custody of the
samples (and sample bottles) is exchanged during field sampling, such transfer must be documented on
the COC form. The departing field staff should sign indicating the custody has been relinquished, and the
arriving field staff should sign indicating responsibility for the custody of the samples.
The COC form and field log book should include:
¦ Sample identification number and matrix
¦ Project or site name or number
¦ Sampler's name or initials
¦ Sample collection date and time (24-hour clock)
¦ Designation as a grab or composite sample
¦ Requested analysis
¦ Any special comments (i.e. 7 day hold time for unpreserved VOCs)
¦ Any preservatives added to the sample
When shipping samples to the laboratory, all sample containers and requested analyses should be noted
on the COC form.
One member of the sampling team should sign the COC form relinquishing custody to the laboratory. If
using an overnight courier service, record the tracking number on the COC. The COC form should be
sealed inside the shipping container with the samples. The paperwork should be sealed inside a plastic
bag to prevent damage from water condensation. The courier does not need to sign the COC form if it is
sealed within the shipping container using custody seals. If the samples are hand delivered to the laboratory
by field staff, the COC form should be signed at the laboratory when the samples are delivered and the
shipping container does not need to be sealed as long as it is kept under proper COC until delivered to the
laboratory. If possible, COC seals should be signed and dated, and the serial numbers listed on the COC
form. At least two seals should be used on each shipping container.
g:\projects\2016 projects\1652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\work plans\labounty\rtc rev final\appendix b_fsp\final rev appendix b labounty fsp
ilF Golder
(08242016).docx
Associates
-------
B-10
165-2829
4.4.2 Laboratory Custody
Once samples are transported to the analytical laboratory, custodial responsibility is transferred to the
Laboratory Sample Manager to assure that the procedures presented in the laboratory's Quality Assurance
Plan (QAP) and the appropriate analytical methods are followed. The laboratory QAP will contain a detailed
description of the laboratory COC procedures, including receipt of samples, designation of a sample
custodian, custody within the laboratory and laboratory storage, and disposal procedures.
i-
g:\projects\2016 projects\1652629 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\work plans\JabountyVtc rev final\appendtx b_f$p\final rev appendix b labounty fsp
(08242016)docx
(f Golder
Associates
-------
B-11
165-2829
5.0 INVESTIGATION DERIVED WASTE
Investigation derived waste (IDW) generated during field activities include: sediment, decontamination
water, and general waste (i.e. disposable sampling equipment/materials, personal protective equipment
(PPE), and associated garbage). Each type of IDW will be handled as described below:
¦ All decontamination water will be retained in DOT-approved 55-gallon drums and labeled
or placed in an appropriately sized^container. Once a drum has been filled, it will be
sealed, dated, numbered, labeled and recorded in the field log book.
General Waste:
¦ All general waste generated during investigations be collected in garbage bags and
disposed of as non-hazardous industrial waste.
IDW container labels will include the:
¦ Nature of the IDW (sediment, decontamination water, etc.)
¦ Date filled
¦ Container number, as recorded in the field log book
¦ "Pending Analysis"
The drums will be staged on-Site. At the end of the field activities, IDW will be disposed of in accordance
with all applicable state and federal regulations.
Sediment:
¦ All excess sediment generated from sampling activities that is not returned to the river will
be retained in DOT-approved 55-gallon drums and labeled appropriately. Once a drum
has been filled, it will be sealed, dated, numbered, labeled, and recorded in the field log
book.
Water:
g:\projects\2016 projectsM652829 - zoetis Charles city\200 reports\work plans\labounty\rtc rev final\appendix b_fsp\final rev appendix b labounty fsp
(08242016).docx
jf Golder
Associates
-------
APPENDIX C
QAPP APPROVAL SHEET
-------
QUALHY ASSURANCE PROJf.^ >>\ <\H APPWCvAv >HtET
~ Mr. P Stephen Finn
Project Plrector for Gotder Assoctatss
I v.. 8^4 16
Signature
• Mr. Andrew Jostyn
Project Manager for Goider Associates
8/24/16
Signature Date
• Ms, Jul® Lahrman
J J, m\; 16
• Ms. Brians Sye Marvuglo
Environmental Liability and Transactions Leader for Zoefis s.tC
¦' I"" • • - •*" .t \ - • , u __ *>¦:
• Ms, Elizabeth Haganmaiar
Remedial Project Manager for USEPft Region 7
'liSiiii ^ " "Date" "
RECE1VEZ3
l'- ' ! ' l"' •' .• * ,>
• v ' : AUGflcOi
< \ h 'it '*• OA globi vv I «i*o»siu' *i»v '"pofiKton;
-------
APPENDIX D
LABORATORY QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUALS (PROVIDED ON CD ONLY)
-------
APPENDIX E
SITE-SPECIFIC HUMAN HEALTH SCREENING LEVEL CALCULATION TABLES
-------
August 2016
Table E-1
Surface Water Exposure Parameters Screening Level Calculations
165-2829
Parameters Isvmboll Value I Unto I Rationale
Younger Child
Averaging Time (non-cancer), Younger Child
Recreational User
ATnee
1,460
days
4 years * 365 day/year
Body Weight -Younger Child
BWe
15
kg
Default Child Body Weight (USEPA, 2016)
Exposure Frequency - Younger Child
EFC
40
days/year
Professional Judgment, assumes a surface
water exposure frequency of eight times a
month over 5 months per year (May through
September)
Exposure Duration - Younger Child
EDe
4.0
years
Ages 2 - <6
Exposure Time, Surface Water - Younger Child
ET„
1,0
hours/event
USEPA, 2011
Event Frequency - Recreational User
EVr#c
1.0
event/day
Professional Judgment
Surface Water Ingestion Rate - Younger Child
IRWe
0.050
L/hour
USEPA. 2016A
Recreational Swimmer Surface Are - Younger
Child
SAe
7,230
cm2
Site-Specific (See Dermal Tables)
Absorbed dose per event
DA^oi
0.0028
|jg/cm2-event
Calculated using Absorbed Dose per Event
equations (USEPA 2004)
Non-Carcinogenic Screening Level - Younger
Child Ingestion
SL
411
pg/L
Calculated
Non-Carcinogenic Screening Level - Younger
Child Dermal
SL
2,840
pg/L
Calculated
Non-Carcinogenic Screening Level- Younger
Child Total
SL
359
pg/L
Calculated
Older Child
Averaging Time (non-cancer), Older Child
Recreational User
ATne oc
3,650
days
10 years * 365 day/year
Body Weight-Older Child
BWoc
44
kg
Derived from EPA Exposure Factors
Handbook (6-11 - 31.8 ka. 11-16 - 56.8 ka)
Exposure Frequency - Older Child
EFo,.
40
days/year
Professional Judgment, assumes a surface
water exposure frequency of eight times a
month over 5 months per year (May through
September)
Exposure Duration - Older Chad
EDoc
10
years
Ages 6 through 16
Exposure Time, Surface Water - Older Child
EToc
1.0
hours/event
USEPA, 2011
Event Frequency - Recreational User
EVjk
1.0
event/day
Professional Judgment
Surface Water Ingestion Rate - Older Child
IRWoe
0.050
L/hour
USEPA, 2016A
Recreational Swimmer Surface Area - Older
Child
SA«
13,350
cm2
Site-Specific (See Dermal Tables)
Absorbed dose per event
DA»«i(
0.005
(jg/cm2-event
Calculated using Absorbed Dose per Event
equations (USEPA 2004)
Non-Carcinogenic Screening Level - Older
Child Inaestion
SL
1,213
pg/L
Calculated
Non-Carcinogenic Screening Level - Older
Child Dermal
SL
4,542
M0/L
Calculated
Non-Carcinogenic Screening Level - Older
Child Total
SL
957
pg/L
Calculated
Adult
Averaging Time (non-cancer), Adult
Recreational User
ATnc ,
3,650
days
10 years * 365 day/year
Body Weight - Adult
BW.
80
kg
USEPA. 2011
Exposure Duration, Adult Recreational User
ED.
10
years
Ages 16-26
Exposure Frequency - Adult
EF.
40
days/year
Professional Judgment, assumes a surface
water exposure frequency of eight times a
month over 5 months per year (May through
September)
Exposure Time- Surface Water - Adult
Recreational User
ET.
1.0
hours/event
USEPA, 2011
Event Frequency - Recreational User
EV^
1.0
event/day
Professional Judgment
Surface Water Ingestion Rate - Adult
Recreational User
IRW„
0.050
L/hour
USEPA, 2016A
Recreational Swimmer Surface Area - Adult
SA,
19,324
cm2
Site-Specific (See Dermal Tables)
Absorbed dose per event
DA™,
0.006
pg/cm2-event
Calculated using Absorbed Dose per Event
equations (USEPA 2004)
Non-Carcinogenic Screening Level - Adult
Ingestion
SL
2,190
pg/L
Calculated
Non-Carcinogenic Screening Level - Adult
Dermal
SL
5,667
PQ/L
Calculated
Non-Carcinogenic Screening Level - Adult
Total
SL
1,580
pg/L
Calculated
Lifetime
Averaging Time (cancer)
ATC
25,550
days
USEPA, 1991
Recreational User Surface Water Ingestion
Rate - age-adjusted
IFW«,
1.178
L/kg
Calculated using USEPA's Regional
Screening Level Calculator (USEPA, 2016B)
Dermal contact factor - age-adjusted
dfwM|
287,920
cm2-event/kg
Calculated using USEPA's Regional
Screening Level Calculator (USEPA. 2016B)
Exposure Time, Surface Water - age-adjusted
ET«,
1.0
hours/event
Calculated using USEPA's Regional
Screening Level Calculator (USEPA. 2016B)
Absorbed dose per event
DA^,m
0.003
pg/cm2-event
Calculated using Absorbed Dose per Event
equations (USEPA 2004)
Carcinogenic Screening Level - Lifetime
Inaestion
SL
723
pg/L
Calculated
Carcinogenic Screening Level - Lifetime Dermal
SL
2,958
pg/L
Calculated
Carcinogenic Screening Level - Lifetime Fish
Ingestion
SL
157
pg/L
See Fish Table
Carcinogenic Screening Level - Lifetime
Total
SL
124
pg/L
Calculated
Chemical-Specific Factors
Dermal Permeability Coefficient
Ko
0.0010
cm/hr
USEPA, 2016A
Oral Reference Dose
RfDe
0.00030
mg/kg-day
USEPA. 2016 - IRIS Database
Oral Slope Factor
CSF0
1.5
(mg/kg-day)1
USEPA, 2016 - IRIS Database
Gastrointestinal Absorption Factor
GIABS
1.0
unitless
USEPA 2016A
Target Hazard Quotient
THQ
0.5
unitless
USEPA. 2016A
Tarqet Risk
TR
5.0E-05
unitless
USEPA. 2016A
References
US'EPA 1991. Human health evaluation manual, supplemental guidance: "Standard default exposure factors" OSWER Directive 9285.6-03
USEPA 2004. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund Volume I. Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part E, Supplemental Guidance for Dermal Risk Assessment) Final.
USEPA2011. Exposure Factors Handbook 2011 Edition (Final). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-09/052F
USEPA 2016A USEPA Regional Screening Level Tables . Available at https://www.epa.gov/risk/regional-screening-levels-rsls-generic-tables-may-2016. Last updated May
2016
USEPA 2016B. USEPA Regional Screening Level Calculator Available athttps://epa-prgs ornl.gov/cgi-bin/chemicals/csl_search. Last updated May 2016
OVROJECTSUOie Pro(*ct«\1662829 - 2mU Cftaflm CltyTOO RepoiBIWort PtanMjBountyWTC R«v FmaftA|*wn<*> E\SM ScwcMc ScfMiWig LM dajjBourty *sk
V24O016
Pag« 1 of 3
-------
August 2016
Table E-2
Sediment Exposure Parameters Screening Level Calculations
165-2829
P*ramrl«>«-s
Symbol
VctiiK?
Unit*
Rational'.!
Younger Child
Averaging time (non-cancer), Younger Child
Recreational User
ATrbus
1,460
days
4 years * 365 day/year
Adnerence Factor - Younger Child Sediment
AFC
5,2
Calculated using factors found in USEPA, 2011
Body Weight -Younger Child
BWC
15
*9
Default Child Body Weight (USEPA, 2016A)
Exposure Frequency - Younger Child
40
days/year
Professional Judgment, assumes a sediment
exposure frequency of eight times a month over
5 months per year (May through September)
Exposure Duration - Younger Child
ED,
4.0
years
Ages 2 - <6
Sediment Ingestion Rate - Younger Child
IRSC
200
mg/day
USEPA, 1991
Recreational Wader- Younger Child
2,006
cm2
Site-Specific (See Dermal Tables)
Non-Carcinogenic Screening Level - Younger
Child ingestion
SL
171
mg/kg
Calculated
Non-Carcinogenic Screening Level - Younger
Child Dermal
SL
65
mg/kg
Calculated
Non-Carcinogenic Screening Level - Younger
Child Total
SL
47
Calculated
....... . . . .
Averaging Time (non-cancer), Older Child
Recreational User
AToc^oe
3,650
days
10 years * 365 day/year
Adherence Factor - Older Child Sediment
AFac
5.2
mgicm2
Calculated using factors found in USEPA, 2011
Body Weight-Older Child
BWw
44
m
Derived from EPA Exposure Factors Handbook
(6-11-31.8kfl.11-16-56.8ka)
Exposure Frequency - Older Child
EF^
40
days/year
Professional Judgment, assumes a sediment
exposure frequency of eight times a month over
5 months per year (May through September)
Exposure Duration - Older Child
ED*
10
years
Ages 6 through 16
Sediment ingestion Rate - Oider Child
IRSflc
100
mg/day
USEPA, 1991
Recreational Wader - Older Child
SA^
3,944
em2
Site-Specific (See Dermal Tables)
Non-Carcinogenic Screening Level - Older Child
\J •
SL
1,011
mg/kg
Calculated
Non-Carcinogenic Screening Level - Older ChHd
Dermal
SL
99
mg/kg
Calculated
Non-Carcinogenic Screening Level - Older
Child Total
SL
91
mgm
Cafcalitid
.
Averaging T ime (non-cancer), Adult
Recreational User
AV.
3,650
10 years * 365 day/year
Adherence Factor - Aduit Sediment
AF,
0.35
mg/cm2
Calculated using factors found in USEPA, 2011
Body Weight-Adult
8W,
80
*3
USEPA. 2011
Exposure Duration, Adult Recreational User
EDa
10
years
Ages 16-26
Exposure Frequency - Adult
EFa
4Q
days/year
Professional Judgment, assumes a sediment
exposure frequency of eight times a month over
5 months per year (May through September)
Sediment ingestion Rate - Aduit
IRS,
100
mg/day
USEPA. 1991
Recreational Wader - Adult
SA.
5.737
€fflS
Site-Specific (See Dermal Tables)
Non-Carcinogenic Screening Level - Adult
Ingestion
SL
1,825
mg/kg
Calculated
Non-Carcinogenic Screening Level - Adult
Derma!
SL
1.794
mg/kg
Calculated
Non-Carcinogenic Screening Level - Adult
Total
SL
S0S
mg/kg
Calculated
UMftn*
Averaging Time (cancer)
ATC
25.550
days
USEPA, 1991
Sediment Ingestion Rate - age-adjusted
IFS«,
3,424
mg/kg
Calculated using USEPA's Regional Screening
Level Calculator (USEPA, 2016B)
Dermal contact factor- age-adjusted
DFSaaj
284,587
mg/kg
Calculated using USEPA's Regional Screening
Level Calculator (USEPA, 2016B)
Carcinogenic Screening Level - Lifetime
ingestion
SL
415
mg/kg
Calculated
Carcinogenic Screening Level - Lifetime Dermal
SL
100
mg/kg
Calculated
Carcinogenic Screening Level - Lifetime
Total
SL
SO
mg/kg
Calculated
Clwiiic>.4!-Sp*'CilK F.v:toi-i
Derma! Absorption Factor
ABSjj '
0.030
unitless
USEPA, 2016A
Oral Reference Dose
RfD0
0.00030
mg/kg-day
USEPA, 2016 - IRIS Database
Oral Slope Factor
CSF0
1.5
USEPA. 2016 - IRIS Database
Gastrointestinal Absowlon fitcior
GIABS
1,0
unitless
USEPA. 2016A
¦¦¦ . ¦ ..... . .. . •
Ri».
0-60
unites
A
Tarart Hazart Quotient
THQ
0.5
unitless
A
Target Risk
TR
5.0E-05
unities®
A
References
USEPA 1991. Human health evaluation manual, supplemental guidance: "Standard default exposure factors" OSWER Directive 9285,6-03
USEPA 2004. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund Volume I: Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part E, Supplemental Guidance for Dermal Risk Assessment) Final.
USEPA 2011, Exposure Factors Handbook 2011 Edition {Final). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-09/052F
USEPA 2016A. USEPA Regional Screening Level Tables. Available at https.//wwwepa.gov/risk/regional-screening-ievels-rsis-generic-tables-may-2016. Last updated May
2016
USEPA 2016B. USEPA Regional Screening Level Calculator. Available athttps://epa-prgs.ornl.gov/cgi-bin/chemicals/csl._search. Last updated May 2016
-------
September 2016
Table E-3
Fish Ingestion Exposure Parameters Screening Level Calculations
165-2829
Poiamlois j Syn.Dt.il V*!.!.- j UniK i Rationale
ChH.1
Averaging Time (non-cancer), Younger Child
ATnc c
1,825
days
5 years * 365 day/year
Body Weight -Younger Child
BW0
15
*9
Default Child Body Weight (USEPA, 2016)
Exposure Frequency - Younger Child
EF0
350
days/year
USEPA, 2016
Exposure Duration - Younger Child
5.0
years
Ages 1 - <6
Fish Ingestion Rate - Younger Child
IRFe
8.7
g/day
USEPA, 1991
Non-Carcinogenic Screening Level - Younger Child.
Tismi©
St
0.27
mg/kg
Calculated
Non-Carcinogenic Screening Level - Younger Child,
Surface Water
Si
270
wj/l
Calculated
i
*1." r.H.M
Averaging Time (non-cancer), Older Child Recreational
User
ATftg pe
3,650
days
10 years * 365 day/year
Body Weight - Older Child
BWoc
44
kg
Derived from EPA Exposure Factors Handbook
(6-11 -31.8ka, 11-16-56.8 kq)
Exposure Frequency - Older Child
__i
350
days/year
USEPA, 2016
Exposure Duration - Older Child
EDqc
10
years
Ages 6 through 16
Fish Ingestion Rate - Older Child
•RFoc
195
USEPA, 1991
Non-Carcinogenic Screening Levei - Older Child,
Tissue
SL
0.36
mg/kg
Calculated
Non-Carcinogenic Screening Levei • Older Child,
Si.rf;iri* Watoi
SL
365
1*
Calculated
AduH
Averaging Time (non-cancer), Adult Recreational User
AT*.
3.650
days
10 years * 365 day/year
Body Weight - Adult
BW,
BO
USEPA, 2011
Exposure Duration, Adult Recreational User
ED.
10
years
Ages 16-26
Exposure Frequency - Adult
EFj
350
days/year
USEPA, 2016
Fish Ingestion Rate - Adult
IRF,
496
g/day
USEPA. 1991
Non-Carcinoqenic Screeninq Levei - Adult. Tissue
SL
O i
..maflsfl
Calculated
Non-Carcinogenic Screening Level - Adult, Surface
Water
SL
252
tigft.
Calculated
Averaging Time (cancer)
ATC
25,550
days
USEPA, 1991
Carcinoqenic Screenina Level - Lifetime, Tissue
SL
0.16
mo*n
Calculated
Carcinogenic Screening Level - Lifetime, Surface Water
SL
157
Pfl
-------
Golder Associates Inc.
200 Century Parkway, Suite C
Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054 USA
Tel: (856) 793-2005
Fax: (856) 793-2006
Gokkr
Associates
Ooidar, GokMr Associates and the GA globe design am ttwiemarta of Gaidar Associates Corporation
------- |