U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Hazard Characterization Document December, 2012 SCREENING-LEVEL HAZARD CHARACTERIZATION OF HIGH PRODUCTION VOLUME CHEMICALS Ring-Substituted Anilines Category SPONSORED CHEMICALS 2,6-Diethylaniline 2-Ethylaniline CASRN 579-66-8 CASRN 578-54-1 SUPPORTING CHEMICALS Aniline 2-Ethyl-6-methylaniline CAS No. 62-53-3 CAS No. 24549-06-2 The High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program1 was conceived as a voluntary initiative aimed at developing and making publicly available screening-level health and environmental effects information on chemicals manufactured in or imported into the United States in quantities greater than one million pounds per year. In the Challenge Program, producers and importers of HPV chemicals voluntarily sponsored chemicals; sponsorship entailed the identification and initial assessment of the adequacy of existing toxicity data/information, conducting new testing if adequate data did not exist, and making both new and existing data and information available to the public. Each complete data submission contains data on 18 internationally agreed to "SIDS" (Screening Information Data Set1'2) endpoints that are screening-level indicators of potential hazards (toxicity) for humans or the environment. The Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) is evaluating the data submitted in the HPV Challenge Program on approximately 1400 sponsored chemicals by developing hazard characterizations (HCs). These HCs consist of an evaluation of the quality and completeness of the data set provided in the Challenge Program submissions. They are not intended to be definitive statements regarding the possibility of unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment. The evaluation is performed according to established EPA guidance2'3 and is based primarily on hazard data provided by sponsors; however, in preparing the hazard characterization, EPA considered its own comments and public comments on the original submission as well as the sponsor's responses to comments and revisions made to the submission. In order to determine whether any new hazard information was developed since the time of the HPV submission, a search of the following databases was made from one year prior to the date of the HPV Challenge submission to the present: (ChemID to locate available data sources including Medline/PubMed, Toxline, HSDB, IRIS, NTP, AT SDR, IARC, EXTOXNET, EPA SRS, etc.), STN/CAS online databases (Registry file for locators, ChemAbs for toxicology data, RTECS, Merck, etc.) and Science Direct and ECHA4. OPPT's focus on these specific sources is based on their being of high quality, 1 U.S. EPA. High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program; http://www.eDa.gov/chemrtk/index.htm. 2 U.S. EPA. HPV Challenge Program - Information Sources; http://www.eDa.gov/chemrtk/Dubs/general/guidocs.htm. 3 U.S. EPA. Risk Assessment Guidelines; http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/raf/rafguid.cfm. 4 European Chemicals Agency, http://echa.europa.eu. 1 ------- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Hazard Characterization Document December, 2012 highly relevant to hazard characterization, and publicly available. OPPT does not develop HCs for those HPV chemicals which have already been assessed internationally through the HPV program of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and for which Screening Initial Data Set (SIDS) Initial Assessment Reports (SIAR) and SIDS Initial Assessment Profiles (SIAP) are available. These documents are presented in an international forum that involves review and endorsement by governmental authorities around the world. OPPT is an active participant in these meetings and accepts these documents as reliable screening-level hazard assessments. These hazard characterizations are technical documents intended to inform subsequent decisions and actions by OPPT. Accordingly, the documents are not written with the goal of informing the general public. However, they do provide a vehicle for public access to a concise assessment. 2 ------- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Hazard Characterization Document December, 2012 Chemical Abstract Service Registry Number (CASRN) Sponsored Chemicals 579-66-8 578-54-1 Supporting Chemicals 63-53-3 24549-06-2 Chemical Abstract Index Name Sponsored Chemicals Benzenamine, 2,6-diethyl- Benzenamine, 2-ethyl- Structural Formula nh2 —-CH, H3C^J SMILES: Nc(c(cccl)CC)clCC nh2 SMILES: Nc(c(cccl)CC)cl Summary The ring substituted anilines are composed of two substances: benzenamine, 2,6-diethyl- and benzenamine, 2-ethyl-. Benzenamine, 2,6-diethyl- is a liquid with low vapor pressure and moderate water solubility, while benzenamine, 2-ethyl- is a liquid with low vapor pressure and high water solubility. Both substances are expected to have moderate mobility in soil. A supporting chemical, benzenamine, 2-ethyl-6-methyl- was not readily biodegradable in two standard OECD screening tests and benzenamine, 2,6-diethyl- did not degrade in 14 days in pond water, but was transformed in soil/water slurries. Volatilization is expected to be moderate for these substances. However, they will partially exist in their protonated form (conjugate acid) rather than as the free base at environmental pH, and the cations will not volatilize. The rate of hydrolysis is negligible. The rate of atmospheric photooxidation is rapid. Benzenamine, 2,6-diethyl- and benzenamine, 2-ethyl-are expected to have moderate to high persistence (P2-P3) and low bioaccumulation potential (Bl). This assessment is based on submitted information and limited database and literature review. A detailed review of the published literature may reveal additional fate information. 3 ------- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Hazard Characterization Document December, 2012 Acute oral toxicity of 2,6-diethylaniline and 2-ethylaniline in rats is low; acute inhalation toxicity in rats is moderate and acute dermal toxicity in rabbits is moderate. In a 90-day dietary repeated-dose toxicity study of 2,6-diethylaniline in rats, increased cholesterol and decreased liver weights were noted >16.5 mg/kg-bw/day. The NOAEL is not established. In the 28-day repeated-dose dermal toxicity study of 2,6-diethylaniline in rats, decreased body weight gain, increased liver weights and increased serum enzyme levels (serum glutamic oxaloacetate transaminase, (SGOT) and serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT)) were observed at > 300 mg/kg-day. The NOAEL is 100 mg/kg-day. No reproductive toxicity studies are available for either chemical. In repeated-dose toxicity studies of 2,6-diethylaniline, no effects on reproductive organs were noted. In a prenatal developmental toxicity study of 2,6-diethylaniline in rats, maternal toxicity (salivation, anogenital staining and decreased body weight gains) was seen at >50 mg/kg-day; the NOAEL for maternal toxicity is not established. In this study, the developmental effects included decreased fetal body weight and increased incidence of unossified sternebrae at 500 mg/kg-day; the NOAEL for developmental toxicity is 250 mg/kg-day. 2,6-Diethylaniline was mutagenic showing weak response but 2-Ethylaniline was not mutagenic in bacteria in vitro. 2,6-Diethylaniline did not induce micronuclei in mice in vivo. 2,6-Diethylaniline was irritating to rabbit skin and irritating to rabbit eyes. 2-Ethylaniline was not irritating to rabbit skin; but was irritating to rabbit eyes. 2,6-Diethyaniline is not sensitizing to guinea pigs. 2,6-Diethylaniline did not increase tumor incidence in rats. Ecotoxicity of the ring-substituted anilines category members show the 96-hour LC50 for fish is 24 mg/L, the 48-h EC50 for aquatic invertebrates ranges from 8 to 21 mg/L and the 96-h EC50 for aquatic plants is 38 mg/L for growth rate. No data gaps were identified under the HPV Challenge Program. The sponsor, Albemarle Corporation, submitted a Test Plan and Robust Summaries to EPA for the ring-substituted anilines category on May 5, 2006. EPA posted the submission on the ChemRTK HPV Challenge website on May 17, 2006 (http://www.epa.gov/oppt/chemrtk/pubs/summaries/ringsac ;.ht.m). EPA comments on the original submission were posted to the website on December 15, 2008. Public comments were also received and posted to the website. The sponsor submitted responses to EPA comments and a revised test plan and robust summaries on June 29, 2009. Category Justification The category consists of two substances that are structurally similar with similar toxicity. EPA considered this grouping acceptable. 4 ------- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Hazard Characterization Document December, 2012 Justification for Supporting Chemicals The sponsor proposed aniline (CAS No. 62-53-3) and 2-ethyl-6-methylaniline (CAS No. 24549-06-2) as supporting chemicals. EPA considered the use of these chemicals appropriate based on their structural similarity to 2,6-diethylaniline and 2-ethylaniline. However, in the revised submission, the sponsor submitted human health and ecotoxicity data for their sponsored chemicals. Therefore, the supporting chemicals data are not used in this hazard characterization. 1. Chemical Identity 1.1 Identification and Purity The ring substituted anilines are composed of two substances: benzenamine, 2,6-diethyl- and benzenamine, 2-ethyl-. Benzenamine, 2,6-diethyl- is a liquid with low vapor pressure and moderate water solubility, while benzenamine, 2-ethyl- is a liquid with low vapor pressure and high water solubility. These substances are used as chemical intermediates in the synthesis of a variety of organic chemicals. 1.2 Physical-Chemical Properties The physical-chemical properties of ring substituted anilines are summarized in Table 1. Table la. Physical-Chemical Properties of the Ring Substituted Anilines1 Property Benzenamine, 2,6-diethyl- Benzenamine, 2-ethyl- Benzenamine (supporting chemical) Benzenamine, 2- ethyl-6-methyl- (supporting chemical) CASRN 579-66-8 578-54-1 62-53-3 24549-06-2 Molecular Weight 149.24 121.18 93.13 135.21 Physical State Liquid Liquid Liquid Liquid Melting Point 3.5°C (measured) -46.5°C (measured) -6.2°C (measured) -25°C (measured) Boiling Point 235.5-242°C (measured) 209.7-214°C (measured) 184°C (measured) 231°C (measured) Vapor Pressure 3.83xl0"3 mm Hg at 25°C (measured) 0.17 mm Hg at 25°C (measured) 0.49 mm Hg at 25°C (measured) 0.05-0.06 mm Hg at 20°C (measured) Dissociation Constant pKb = 9.71 (measured)2 pKb = 9.7 (measured) pKb = 9.4 (measured) pKb = 10.1 (estimated)3 Henry's Law Constant l.lxlO"6 "3 atm-m /mol (estimated)4 6.8xl0"6 "3 atm-m /mol (estimated)4 2.02xl0"6 "3 atm-m /mol (measured)5 4.0xl0"6 "3 atm-m /mol (estimated)4 5 ------- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Hazard Characterization Document December, 2012 Water Solubility 670 mg/L at 26.7°C (measured) 4,000 mg/L at 20°C (measured) 36,000 mg/L at 20°C (measured) 2,660 mg/L at 22°C (measured) Log Kow 0.95 (measured)6; 3.15 (estimated)4 2.04 (measured) 0.91 (measured) 2.66 (estimated)4 1 Albemarle Corporation. 2009. Transmittal Letter and Revisions for the Ring Substituted Anilines Category. Available online at http://www.epa.gov/hpv/pubs/summaries/ringsact/cl6251tc.htm as of August 22, 2012. 2Liu SY; Minard RD; Bollag JM. 1987. Soil-catalyzed complexation of the pollutant 2,6-diethylaniline with syringic acid. J Environ Qual 16(l):48-54. 3SPARC. 2011. pKa/property server. Ver 4.6. Available online at http://archemcalc.com/sparc as of August 22. 2012. 4U.S. EPA. 2012. Estimation Programs Interface Suite™ for Microsoft® Windows, v4.10. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA. Available online at http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/exposure/pubs/episuitedl.htm as of August 22, 2012. 5SRC. 2012. The Physical Properties Database (PHYSPROP). SRC: Syracuse, NY. Available online at http://www.srcinc.com/what-we-do/free-demos.aspx as of August 22, 2012. 6 This is the measured value as reported in the robust summary obtained from a published study (Lu PY, Metcalf RL. 1975. Environ. Health Perspect.; 10: 269-84). Comparing this log Kow to the other log Kow values in this category, suggests that the log Kow of 0.95 for benzenamine, 2,6-diethyl-is inaccurate. 2. General Information on Exposure 2.1 Production Volume and Use The Ring Substituted Anilines Category chemicals had an aggregated production and/or import volume in the United States between 10 to 50 million pounds during calendar year 2005. CASRN 579-66-8: 10 to < 50 million pounds; CASRN 578-54-1 was not reported in the 2006 IUR. CASRN 579-66-8: Non-confidential information in the IUR indicated that the industrial processing and uses of the chemical include pesticide and other agricultural chemical manufacturing as intermediates. No commercial and consumer uses were reported for the chemical. 2.2 Environmental Exposure and Fate The ring substituted anilines are expected to have moderate mobility in soil. Benzenamine, 2,6- diethyl- did not degrade in 14 days in pond water and was only degraded 3% after 14 days when the pond water was amended with sewage sludge. However, it was rapidly transformed using a non sterilized Hagerstown silt loam in soil/water slurries. More than 40 and 75% of the initially applied amount disappeared after 5 and 20 hours, respectively. The degradation rate was shown to be pH-dependent with >85% loss after 10 hours when the pH was adjusted to 3.8, but only 20% degradation after 10 hours at pH 7. The degradation mechanism was unclear since some benzenamine, 2,6-diethyl- was degraded in gamma irradiated and autoclaved soils as well. Benzenamine, 2,6-diethyl- was degraded 17-32%> after 30 days when incubated at 22°C under anaerobic conditions using an agricultural silt loam in soil/water slurries. No degradation was 6 ------- U. S. Environmental Protection Agency December, 2012 Hazard Characterization Document observed using a sandy loam previously exposed to metolachlor or in bovine rumen after 30 days under anaerobic conditions. Supporting chemical benzenamine, 2-ethyl-6-methyl- achieved 0% of its theoretical biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) after 30 days using an adapted sewage sludge as inoculum and the closed bottle (OECD 301D) test. It was also <10% degraded after 28 days as measured by the modified OECD screening (OECD 301E) test. Supporting substance benzenamine was shown to be readily biodegradable using the modified MITI (OECD 301C) test and is a benchmark chemical often used as a control for aerobic ready biodegradation tests. Volatilization is expected to be moderate for these substances. However, they will partially exist in their protonated form (conjugate acid) rather than as the free base at environmental pH, and the cations will not volatilize. The rate of hydrolysis is negligible. A bioconcentration factor of 120 was reported for benzenamine, 2,6-diethyl- using gambusia affinis (western mosquitofish). The rate of atmospheric photooxidation is rapid. The ring substituted anilines are expected to have overall moderate persistence (P2) and may be more persistent (P3) in some environmental compartments, and low bioaccumulation potential (Bl). The environmental fate characteristics of ring substituted anilines are summarized in Table 2. Table lb. Environmental Fate Characteristics of the Ring Substituted Anilines1 Property Benzenamine, 2,6-diethyl- Benzenamine, 2-ethyl- Benzenamine (supporting chemical) Benzenamine, 2- ethyl-6-methyl- (supporting chemical) CASRN 579-66-8 578-54-1 62-53-3 24549-06-2 Photodegradati on Half-life 0.8 hours (estimated) 1.0 hours (estimated) 1.2 hours (estimated) 0.8 hours (estimated) Hydrolysis Half- life Stable Stable Stable Stable Biodegradation 0% after 14 days in pond water; 40% after 5 hours and 75%) after 20 hours in soil/water slurry3; 17-32% after 30 days under anaerobic conditions3 No data 90% after 14 days in pond water; 85-99% after 14 days (readily biodegradable, OECD 301C)4 0%> after 30 days (not readily biodegradable, OECD 301D); <10%> after 28 days (not readily biodegradable, OECD 301E); 0-27% after 30 days under anaerobic conditions3 Bioaccumulation Factor BCF = 120 (measured in mosquitofish); BAF = 53.5 2 (estimated) BAF = 9.8 (estimated) BAF = 1.6 2 (estimated) BAF = 26.8 (estimated) 7 ------- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Hazard Characterization Document December, 2012 Table lb. Environmental Fate Characteristics of the Ring Substituted Anilines1 Benzenamine Benzenamine, 2- ethyl-6-methyl- Benzenamine, Benzenamine, (supporting (supporting Property 2,6-diethyl- 2-ethyl- chemical) chemical) Log Koc 2.8 (estimated)2 2.3 (estimated)2 1.9 (estimated)2 2.6 (estimated)2 Fugacity (Level III Model)2 Air (%) <0.1 0.1 0.3 <0.1 Water (%) 18.8 20.9 29.5 19.8 Soil (%) 80.4 78.7 70.1 79.7 Sediment (%) 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.4 Persistence5 P2-P3 (moderate P2 (moderate to PI (low-moderate) P2 (moderate-high) to high) high) Bioaccumulation5 Bl (low) Bl (low) Bl (low) Bl (low) 1 Albemarle Corporation. 2009. Transmittal Letter and Revisions for the Ring Substituted Anilines Category. Available online at http://www.epa.gov/hpv/pubs/summaries/ringsact/cl6251tc.htm as of August 22, 2012. 2U.S. EPA. 2012. Estimation Programs Interface Suite™ for Microsoft® Windows, v4.10. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA. Available online at http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/exposure/pubs/episuitedl.htm as of August 22, 2012. 3HSDB. 2012. Hazardous Substance Data Bank. Available online at http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/cgi- bin/sis/htmlgen?HSDB as of August 22, 2012. 4Chemical Risk Information Platform (CHRIP) database. Searchable by CASRN online at http://www.safe.nite. go. jp/english/db.html as of August 22, 2012. 5Federal Register. 1999. Category for Persistent, Bioaccumulative, and Toxic New Chemical Substances. Federal Register 64, Number 213, pp. 60194-60204. Conclusion: The ring substituted anilines are composed of two substances: benzenamine, 2,6- diethyl- and benzenamine, 2-ethyl-. Benzenamine, 2,6-diethyl- is a liquid with low vapor pressure and moderate water solubility, while benzenamine, 2-ethyl- is a liquid with low vapor pressure and high water solubility. Both substances are expected to have moderate mobility in soil. A supporting chemical, benzenamine, 2-ethyl-6-methyl- was not readily biodegradable in two standard OECD screening tests and benzenamine, 2,6-diethyl- did not degrade in 14 days in pond water, but was transformed in soil/water slurries. Volatilization is expected to be moderate for these substances. However, they will partially exist in their protonated form (conjugate acid) rather than as the free base at environmental pH, and the cations will not volatilize. The rate of hydrolysis is negligible. The rate of atmospheric photooxidation is rapid. Benzenamine, 2,6- diethyl- and benzenamine, 2-ethyl-are expected to have moderate to high persistence (P2-P3) and low bioaccumulation potential (Bl). This assessment is based on submitted information and limited database and literature review. A detailed review of the published literature may reveal additional fate information. 8 ------- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Hazard Characterization Document December, 2012 3. Human Health Hazard A summary of health effects data for SIDS and other endpoints is provided in Table 3. The table also indicates where available data for one chemical are read-across (RA) to the other chemical in the category. Acute Oral Toxicity 2, 6-Diethylaniline (CASRN 579-66-8) (1) Sprague-Dawley rats (15/sex/dose) were administered 2,6-diethylaniline (>98% purity) via gavage (assumed route) at 500, 750, 1000, 1500 2000 and 2500 mg/kg. The observation period is not indicated in the robust summary. Mortality occurred within 3 days post dosing with an isolated delayed mortality on day 8 (details of mortality per dose are not indicated in the robust summary.) LD50 = 1800 mg/kg (2) CD rats (5 males/dose) were administered 2,6-diethylaniline (>98% purity) via gavage (assumed route) at 1350, 2020, 3040 or 4560 mg/kg. Observation period is not indicated in the robust summary. All animals died at 4560 mg/kg; no animals died at 1350 mg/kg. At 2020 and 3040 mg/kg each, 2/5 animals died. LD50 = 2690 mg/kg 2-Ethylaniline (CASRN 578-54-1) CD rats (5/sex/dose) were administered 2-ethylaniline (technical grade) via gavage at 290, 590, 1170, 2350 or 4700 mg/kg and observed for 14 days. Only five males were dosed at 4700 mg/kg. Mortalities were 0/10, 0/10, 7/10, 10/10 and 5/5 at 290, 590, 1170, 2350 and 4700 mg/kg, respectively. LD50 = 1010 mg/kg Acute Inhalation Toxicity 2, 6-Diethylaniline (CASRN 579-66-8) Male rats (strain and number per concentration not specified) were exposed to 2, 6-dithey aniline (>98%) purity) at 0, 210, 220 or 4700 mg/m3 (0, 0.21, 0.22 or 4.7 mg/L, respectively) for 1, 4 or 6 hours. The observation period is not identified in the robust summary. Rats exposed to 0.21 mg/L survived single one- and four-h exposures and 16 six-h exposures. All rats exposed to 4.7 mg/L for a single six-hour exposure died within 3 days. No information is provided on the effects of exposure to 0.22 mg/L. LC50 (males) > 0.22 < 4.7 mg/L 2-Ethylaniline (CASRN 578-54-1) CD Rats (5 males) were exposed to 2-ethylaniline (technical grade) as a vapor at 1.07 mg/L for 1 or 4 hours and observed for 14 days following dosing. No mortalities were observed. LC50 (males) > 1.07 mg/L 9 ------- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Hazard Characterization Document December, 2012 Acute Dermal Toxicity 2,6-Diethylaniline (CASRN 579-66-8) New Zealand White rabbits (4/sex/dose) were administered 2,6-diethylaniline (>98% purity) via the dermal route on to two intact and two abraded skin sites at doses ranging from 262 to 6545 mg/kg , in contact with skin for 24 hours (conditions for occlusion are not provided). Observation period is not indicated in the robust summary. All animals died at 2992 and 6545 mg/kg within 7 days. No deaths occurred at 262 or 393 mg/kg. Additionally, one animal each was administered 2, 6-diethylaniline at 9350, 14,960, 22,440 or 33,660 mg/kg and mortalities were observed at all doses. LD50 = 1160 mg/kg 2-Ethylaniline (CASRN 578-54-1) New Zealand White rabbits (4/sex/dose) were administered 2-ethylaniline (technical grade) via the dermal route on to two intact and two abraded skin sites at 350, 540, 830 and 1300 mg/kg for 24 hours under occluded conditions. Observation period is not indicated in the robust summary. All rabbits died at 1300 mg/kg on day 1 or 2 post dosing; two rabbits with abraded skin dosed at 830 mg/kg died on day 8 post dosing. No rabbits died at 540 mg/kg. LD50 = 840 mg/kg Repeated-Dose Toxicity 2,6-Diethylaniline (CASRN 579-66-8) Oral In a 90-day repeated-dose toxicity study, Sprague-Dawley rats (25/sex/dose, except 10/sex in high-dose group) were administered 2,6-diethylaniline (>98% purity) in the diet at 0, 0.03, 0.12, 0.48 or 0.72%) (~ 0, 16.5, 66, 264 or 396 mg/kg-bw/day) for 90 days. An additional 10 males and 10 females in 0.48%> and control groups were included for 45-day sacrifice and the 0.12% group was included for pathological examination only. At the 45-day sacrifice, animals treated at 0.48%o diet had slightly heavier livers and slightly elevated blood cholesterol. No effects were during macroscopic or microscopic of organs were noted in sacrificed animals. No deaths or altered clinical signs were observed in any treatment group. Retarded rates of body weight gain and reduced food consumption were observed in females at days 45 and 90; but not in males. At the 90-day sacrifice, treatment-related effects included mildly elevated serum cholesterol levels in all animals and decreased liver weights in animals treated at 0.12%. No other notable effects were observed in hematology, blood chemistry, urinalyses, or during microscopic examination. LOAEL = 16.5 mg/kg-bw/day (based on increased serum cholesterol and reduced liver weights) NOAEL = Not established 10 ------- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Hazard Characterization Document December, 2012 Dermal In a repeated-dose dermal toxicity study, Sprague-Dawley rats (10/sex/group) were administered 2,6-diethylaniline (>98.5% purity) on to the shaved back skin of rats at 0, 100, 300 or 1000 mg/kg-day for 6 hours/day, 5 days/week for 28 days. Rats were fitted with collars to prevent 2,6-diethylaniline ingestion. After 6 hours of exposure each day, the remaining test substance at the application site was wiped clean. Thirty tissue types were examined histologically from the 1000 mg/kg-day and control animals, and skin, kidneys and spleens were also examined from animals dosed at 100 or 300 mg/kg-day. Three animals died at 1000 mg/kg-. Treatment-related effects included moderately decreased body weight gain in males at 1000 mg/kg-day and a lesser decrease in body weight gain in males at 300 mg/kg-day and in females at 1000 mg/kg-day. Treatment-related effects included increased reticulocytes in males and females dosed at 1000 mg/kg-day and slightly increased serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) and/or serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) levels (associated with slight increases in liver weights) in animals at 300 or 1000 mg/kg/day. Treatment-related skin lesions (superficial inflammation) and very slight histopathological lesions of the spleen (females, increased hemosiderin) and kidneys (males, increased eosinophilic hyaline droplet formation in cytoplasm of cortical renal tubular epithelial cells) were observed at 100 mg/kg-day. Additional treatment- related effects observed at 300 and 1000 mg/kg-day included decreased weight gain, slightly increased liver weights and increased serum enzymes. LOAEL = 300 mg/kg-day (based on decreased weight gain, increased liver weights and increased serum enzymes levels) NOAEL = 100 mg/kg-day Reproductive Toxicity 2,6-Diethylaniline (CASRN 579-66-8) No reproductive toxicity data are available for 2,6-diethylaniline and 2-ethylaniline or the supporting chemicals. Since in repeated-dose toxicity studies, described above, no effects on reproductive organs were seen and available developmental toxicity study for 2,6-diethylaniline addresses the reproductive toxicity endpoint. 2,6-Diethylaniline (CASRN579-66-8) (1) In a 90-day dietary study of 2,6-diethylaniline in rats, histological examinations of tissues from the control group and the highest two dose groups (-264 and 398 mg/kg-bw/day) at interim (day 45) and terminal sacrifices showed no treatment-related effects on the reproductive organs from males or females. No effects on reproductive organ histology were seen in this study. (2) In a 28-day dermal study of 2,6-diethylaniline in rats, 30 tissues were examined histologically from control and high-dose animals, and no effects on reproductive organs were noted. No effects on reproductive organ histology were noted in this study. 11 ------- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Hazard Characterization Document December, 2012 Developmental Toxicity 2,6-Diethylaniline (CASRN 579-66-8) In a prenatal developmental toxicity study, pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats (24/dose in control, low and mid-dose groups and 29 in the high-dose group) were administered 2, 6-diethylaniline (>98% purity) at 0, 50, 250 and 500 mg/kg-day daily via gavage during gestation days 6 through 15. Animals were observed fir mortality, body weight, food consumption and any toxicological effects. All dams were sacrificed on day 20 and gross postmortem examinations were conducted. Two females at 500 mg/kg-day died and here were sacrificed moribund during the study. Salivation, anogenital staining and decreased maternal body weight gains were noted at all doses; not significant at 50 mg/kg-day. Pregnancy rates and uterine implantations were comparable among treated and control groups. Mean fetal body weights were comparable in control, 50, and 250 mg/kg-day group pups. At 500 mg/kg-day, pup weights were 9% lower that the controls. No treatment-related effects were observed regarding external, visceral or skeletal malformations except an increased incidence of unossified sternebrae (5th and 6th vertebrae) in 500 mg/kg-day group pups. LOAEL (maternal toxicity) = 50 mg/kg-day (based on salivation, anogenital staining and decreased maternal body weight gains) NOAEL (maternal toxicity) = Not established LOAEL (developmental toxicity) = 500 mg/kg-day (based on decreased fetal weight and increased incidence of unossified sternebrae) NOAEL (developmental toxicity) = 250 mg/kg-day Genetic Toxicity — Gene Mutations In vitro 2,6-Diethylaniline (CASRN 579-66-8) (1) In Ames test, Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and TA1538 were exposed to 2,6-diethylaniline (98.2% purity, 1% v/v solution in dimethylsulfoxide [DMSO]) at 0.01, 0.05, 0.10, 0.50 or 1.0 |iL/platein the presence and absence of metabolic activation. The cytotoxic concentration was > 1.0 |iL/plate. The results were negative. The information on the use and response of positive controls was not provided. 2,6-Diethylaniline was not mutagenic in this assay. (2) In a point mutation assay, Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells were exposed to 2,6- diethylaniline (>98% purity) at concentrations of 300 - 500 |ag/mL in the absence and 200 - 400 |ig/mL in the presence of metabolic activation. Slightly elevated mutation frequencies were seen at several concentrations producing significant cytotoxicity, but these increases were weak, and not statistically significant. Six additional concentrations, ranging from 450 to 475 |ig/mL and 275-400 |ig/mL, in absence and presence of metabolic activation, respectively, were tested to clarify inconsistent results. Only weak and sporadic increases in mutation frequency were noted following incubation of Chinese hamster ovary cells with 2,6 diethylaniline. These increases were neither statistically significant nor dose related. Therefore, 2,6-diethylaniline is not considered to be mutagenic at the hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase (HGPRT) locus of Chinese hamster ovary cells. 12 ------- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Hazard Characterization Document December, 2012 2,6-Diethylaniline was not mutagenic in this assay. (3) Salmonella typhimurium strain TA100 was exposed to 2,6-diethylaniline (98.27% purity) at concentrations ranging from 0.003 to 3.00 |iL/plate in the presence and 0.0015 to 2.25 |iL/plate in the absence of metabolic activation. Very slight but apparently dose-related increases in revertants were observed in glass and plastic petri dishes with activation. In the absence of activation, a slight increase in revertants was seen in plastic but not glass dishes. Responses were never more than twice those in solvent controls, and not always reproducible. Conclusion was that 2,6 diethylaniline was weakly mutagenic in TA 100 in the presence of activation, but the low level of response was not considered to be biologically significant. No information was provided on the use and response of the positive controls. 2,6-Diethylaniline was weakly mutagenic in this assay. (4) Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98 and TA100 were exposed to 2,6-diethylaniline (>98% purity) at concentrations ranging from 0.25 to 3000 |ig/plate with and without metabolic activation. Cytotoxic concentration was >1 mg/plate without activation and 3 mg/plate and above with metabolic activation. The test substance produced negative results in TA98 with and without activation and weakly mutagenic response in TA100 in the presence of activation. No information was provided on the use and response of the positive controls. 2,6-Diethylaniline was weakly mutagenic in this assay. (5) In Ames test, Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, and TA1537 were exposed to 2,6-diethylaniline (99.5% purity) at 0, 0.05, 0.15, 1.50 or 5.0 mg/plate with and without metabolic activation. Cytotoxicity was observed at 5.0 mg/plate. For TA 100 and TA 1535, observed increases in revertants/plate were limited to 1.5 to 2 fold over control values, generally at 1.5 mg/plate. Although there was some activity in the absence of S-9, more consistent activity was observed in the presence of nasal turbinate S-9. There were no substantial differences between rat, mouse or monkey S-9, but the responses were marginal, limiting the comparison. Positive and negative controls were used, but their response was not provided. No information was provided with regards to observed precipitation. 2,6-Diethylaniline was equivocal for mutagenicity in this assay. 2-Ethylaniline (CASRN 578-54-1) Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and TA1538 were exposed to 2-ethylaniline (99.6% purity) at 0, 0.05, 0.15, 0.5, 1.5 or 5.0 without and at 0.15, 0.5, 1.5, 5.0 or 15 |iL/mL with metabolic activation.. Solvent and positive controls were used; however, no information was provided on their response. No significant increase in revertants was noted at any concentration either with and without metabolic activation.. 2-Ethylaniline was not mutagenic in this assay. 13 ------- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Hazard Characterization Document December, 2012 Genetic Toxicity - Chromosomal Aberrations In vitro No data In vivo 2,6-Diethylaniline (CASRN 579-66-8) In a micronucleus test, BS-1 mice (4/sex/group) were administered 2,6-diethylaniline (98.2% purity) in 0.25% methylcellulose via intraperitoneal injection at 100 or 200 mg/kg as a split-dose separated by 24 hours. Polychromatic erythrocytes from bone marrow extractions were examined for micronuclei. Mice showed signs of systemic toxicity (increased spontaneous activity, mild convulsions, ataxia and/or loss of righting). Negative and positive controls were included and responded appropriately. There was no increase in the number of micronuclei in polychromatic erythrocytes 2,6-Diethylaniline did not induce micronuclei in mice in this assay. Additional Information Skin Irritation 2,6-Diethylaniline (CASRN 579-66-8) Rabbits (six animals; sex and strain not specified) were administered 0.7 g 2,6-diethylaniline (>98%) purity) dermally on to the intact and abraded skin at 0.7 g for 24 hours under semi- occlusive conditions. Scoring was made for Erythema, edema and eschar at 24 and 72 hours following dosing. Erythema and edema were observed on the intact sites of three animals at 24 hours and one animal at 72 hours. The Primary Irritation Index was 2.7. 2,6-Diethylaniline was slightly irritating to rabbit skin in this study. 2-Ethylaniline (CASRN 578-54-1) Six rabbits (sex and strain not specified) were administered 0.5 mL 2-ethylaniline (technical grade) dermally on to the intact and abraded skin sites for 24 hours under semi-occlusive conditions Scoring for Erythema, edema and eschar was made at 24 and 72 hours following dosing. The Primary Irritation Score was 0.33. Two animals had erythema score of "1" at 24 hour reading while others had a score of "0". 2-Ethylaniline was not irritating to rabbit skin in this study. 14 ------- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Hazard Characterization Document December, 2012 Eye Irritation 2,6-Diethylaniline (CASRN 579-66-8) Rabbits (seven animals; sex and strain not specified) received an ocular administration of 2,6- diethylaniline (>98% purity, amount not specified) and were observed for 10 days following instillation. Treatment-related effects included swelling and erythema in the tissues around the eyes, cloudiness of the cornea and purulent discharge. Microscopic examination of the eyes showed marked edema with infiltration by lymphocytes and polymorphonuclear leucocytes within the eyelids. Conjunctivae were markedly hyperemic. Minute ulcerations were present in the cornea. 2,6-Diethylaniline was irritating to rabbit eyes in this study. 2-Ethylaniline (CASRN 578-54-1) Six rabbits (males and females; strain not specified) had instilled 0.1 mL of 2-ethylaniline (technical grade) in one eye and were observed for > 7 days following instillation. All rabbits showed slight irritation of corneas and conjunctivae after 24 hours. All treated eyes showed improvement by day 7. 2-Ethylaniline was mildly irritating to rabbit eyes in this study. Sensitization 2,6-Diethylaniline (CASRN 579-66-8) Guinea pigs (six test and four positive control animals; sex and strain not specified) were exposed to 2,6-diethylaniline (>98% purity) in an induction phase consisting of a 0.05 mL intracutaneous injection followed by nine 0.1 mL intracutaneous injections given on every other day. Two weeks after the 10th injection, a 0.05 mL intracutaneous challenge injection was made. Positive control animals were administered 0.1% dinitrochlorobenzene and responded appropriately. None of the animals reacted to sensitizing to challenge injections. 2,6-Diethylaniline was not sensitizing to guinea pigs in this study. Carcinogenicity 2,6-Diethylaniline (CASRN 579-66-8) Sprague-Dawley rats (80/sex/concentration, 100/sex control group) were administered 2,6- diethylaniline (>98%) purity) in the diet daily at 0, 0.02, 0.16 or 0.32% for 104 weeks. Clinical chemistry and hematological evaluations included methemoglobin analysis. Urine analysis was also conducted. Histopathological examination was conducted on gross lesions and a standard set of tissues. Reproductive organs evaluated included testes, prostates, epididymides, seminal vesicles, Fallopian tubes, ovaries, uteruses, cervixes, mammary glands and vaginas. No effects were observed on survival, food consumption, clinical pathology values, organ weights or incidence of neoplastic or non-neoplastic lesions. A statistically significant increase in number of female rats exhibiting adenocarcinomas of the mammary gland was observed in the high dose animals compared to control. However, the incidence was similar to that reported to occur 15 ------- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Hazard Characterization Document December, 2012 spontaneously in female Sprague Dawley rats. There was not an increase in the number of neoplasms per animal. Retardation of body weight gain was observed in high-dose male and female rats at each 6-month interval. 2,6-Diethylaniline did not increase tumor incidence in this study. Conclusion: Acute oral toxicity of 2,6-diethylaniline and 2-ethylaniline in rats is low; acute inhalation toxicity in rats is moderate and acute dermal toxicity in rabbits is moderate. In a 90- day dietary repeated-dose toxicity study of 2,6-diethylaniline in rats, increased cholesterol and decreased liver weights were noted >16.5 mg/kg-bw/day. The NOAEL is not established. In the 28-day repeated-dose dermal toxicity study of 2,6-diethylaniline in rats, decreased body weight gain, increased liver weights and increased serum enzyme levels (serum glutamic oxaloacetate transaminase, (SGOT) and serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT)) were observed at > 300 mg/kg-day. The NOAEL is 100 mg/kg-day. No reproductive toxicity studies are available for either chemical. In repeated-dose toxicity studies of 2,6-diethylaniline, no effects on reproductive organs were noted. In a prenatal developmental toxicity study of 2,6-diethylaniline in rats, maternal toxicity (salivation, anogenital staining and decreased body weight gains) was seen at >50 mg/kg-day; the NOAEL for maternal toxicity is not established. In this study, the developmental effects included decreased fetal body weight and increased incidence of unossified sternebrae at 500 mg/kg-day; the NOAEL for developmental toxicity is 250 mg/kg-day. 2,6-Diethylaniline was mutagenic showing weak response but 2-Ethylaniline was not mutagenic in bacteria in vitro. 2,6-Diethylaniline did not induce micronuclei in mice in vivo. 2,6-Diethylaniline was irritating to rabbit skin and irritating to rabbit eyes. 2-Ethylaniline was not irritating to rabbit skin; but was irritating to rabbit eyes. 2,6-Diethyaniline is not sensitizing to guinea pigs. 2,6-Diethylaniline did not increase tumor incidence in rats. Table 3. Summary of the Screening Information Data Set as Submitted under the U.S. HPV Challenge Program -Human Health Data Endpoints 2,6-Diethylaniline (579-66-8) 2-Ethylaniline (578-54-1) Acute Oral Toxicity LD5o (mg/kg) 1800 2690 1010 Acute Dermal Toxicity LD50 (mg/kg) 1160 840 Acute Inhalation Toxicity LC50 (mg/L) >0.22 < 4.7 >1.07 Repeated-Dose Toxicity NOAEL/LOAEL Oral (90-day, diet) NOAEL = Not established LOAEL = 16.5 No data NOAEL = Not established LOAEL = 16.5 16 ------- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Hazard Characterization Document December, 2012 (mg/kg-bw/day) (RA) Repeated-Dose Toxicity NOAEL/LOAEL Dermal (mg/kg-day) (28-day) NOAEL = 100 LOAEL = 300 No data NOAEL = 100 LOAEL = 300 (RA) Reproductive Toxicity NOAEL/LOAEL Oral (mg/kg-bw/day) No effects were seen following evaluation of reproductive organs in 28-day dermal and 90-day oral toxicity studies in rats. No data No effects were seen following evaluation of reproductive organs in 28- day dermal and 90-day oral toxicity studies in rats. (RA) Developmental Toxicity NOAEL/LOAEL Oral (mg/kg-bw/day) Maternal Toxicity NOAEL = Not established LOAEL = 50 No data Not established 50 Developmental Toxicity NOAEL = 250 LOAEL = 500 NOAEL = 250 LOAEL = 500 (RA) Genetic Toxicity - Gene Mutation- in vitro Weakly positive Negative Genetic Toxicity - Chromosomal Aberration in vitro No data Nodata Genetic Toxicity - Chromosomal Aberration in vivo Negative No data Negative (RA) Other Information Skin Irritation Eye Irritation Sensitization Carcinogenicity Irritating Irritating Negative Did not increase tumor incidence Not irritating Irritating No data Measured data in bold text; (RA) = Read Across; - indicates that endpoint was not evaluated for this compound; 17 ------- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Hazard Characterization Document December, 2012 4. Hazard to the Environment A summary of ecotoxicity data for SIDS and other endpoints is provided in Table 4. The table also indicates where data for the supporting chemical are read-across (RA) to the sponsored substances. Acute Toxicity to Fish 2,6-Diethylaniline (CASRN 579-66-8) (1) Rainbow trout (iOncorhynchus mykiss) were exposed to 2,6-diethylaniline (98.8% purity) at unspecified concentrations under static conditions for 96 hours. 96-h LC50 = 24 mg/L (2) Bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus) were exposed to 2,6-diethylaniline (98.8% purity) at unspecified concentrations under static conditions for 96 hours. 96-h LC50 = 30 mg/L 2-Ethylaniline (CASRN 578-54-1) Guppies (Poecilia reticulata) were exposed to 2-ethylaniline (> 98% purity) prepared in isopropanol at unspecified concentrations under static-renewal conditions for 14 days. 14-d LC50= 74.7 mg/L Acute Toxicity to Aquatic Invertebrates 2-Ethylaniline (CASRN 578-54-1) Water fleas (Daphnia magna) were exposed to 2-ethylaniline (> 98% purity) prepared in isopropanol at unspecified concentrations under static conditions for 48 hours. The 48-h LC50 value of 12 mg/L was predicted by ECOSAR v. 1.11 to support the evaluation of aquatic invertebrate toxicity. 48-h EC50 = 8 mg/L 2,6-Diethylaniline (CASRN 579-66-8) Water fleas (D. magna) were exposed to 2,6-diethylaniline (98.8% purity) at unspecified concentrations under static conditions for 48 hours. 48-h EC50 = 21 mg/L 18 ------- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Hazard Characterization Document December, 2012 Toxicity to Aquatic Plants 2-Ethylaniline (CASRN 578-54-1) Green algae (Chlorellapyrenoidosa) were exposed to 2-ethylaniline (> 98% purity) prepared in isopropanol at unspecified concentrations under static conditions for 96 hours. The 96-h EC50 value of 41 mg/L was predicted by ECOSAR v. 1.11 to support the evaluation of aquatic plant toxicity. 96-h EC50 (growth rate) = 38 mg/L Chronic Toxicity to Aquatic Invertebrates 2-Ethylaniline (CASRN 578-54-1) Water fleas (D. magna; 10 replicates of 1 daphnid per test concentration) were exposed to 2- ethylaniline at unspecified concentrations under static-renewal conditions for 21 days. The lowest rejected concentration tested (LRCT) that significantly lowered the population intrinsic growth rate (rm) of the daphnids was 1 mg/L and the LRCT that significantly lowered the mean length of daphnids after 21 days of exposure was 3.2 mg/L. 21-d LC50 = 7 mg/L Conclusion: For the ring-substituted anilines category members, the 96-hour LC50 for fish is 24 mg/L, the 48-h EC50 for aquatic invertebrates ranges from 8 to 21 mg/L and the 96-h EC50 for aquatic plants is 38 mg/L for growth rate. Table 4. Summary of the Screening Information Data Set as Submitted under the U.S. HPV Challenge Program- Aquatic toxicity Endpoints 2,6-Diethylaniline (579-66-8) 2-Ethylaniline (578-54-1) Fish 96-h LC50 (mg/L) 24 No Adequate Data 24 (RA) Aquatic Invertebrates 48-h EC50 (mg/L) 21 8 Aquatic Plants 96-h EC50 (mg/L) (growth rate) No Data 38 (RA) 38 (Bold) = experimental data (i.e., derived from testing); (RA) = Read Across 19 ------- |