PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

United States

Environmental Protection Agency

December 2024
Office of Chemical Safety and
Pollution Prevention

Draft Data Quality Evaluation and Data Extraction Information for
Environmental Release and Occupational Exposure for

Dicyclohexyl Phthalate (DCHP)
(1,2- Benzenedicarboxylic acid, 1,2-dicyclohexyl ester)

Systematic Review Support Document for the Draft Risk Evaluation

CASRN: 84-61-7

December 2024


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

This supplemental file contains information regarding the data extraction and quality evaluation results for data sources that
were considered for the Draft Risk Evaluation for Dicyclohexyl Phthalate (DCHP) and that underwent systematic review. EPA
conducted data extraction, and quality evaluation based on author-reported descriptions and results; additional analyses (e.g.,
statistical analyses) potentially conducted by EPA are not contained in this supplemental file. EPA used the TSCA systematic
review process described in the Draft Systematic Review Protocol Supporting TSCA Risk Evaluations for Chemical Substances
(also referred to as the '2021 Draft Systematic Review Protocol').

Data that met the RESO screening criteria during the full-text screening was extracted by three data types, general facility,
occupational exposure, and environmental release, as explained in Section 6.2 of the 2021 Draft Systematic Review Protocol.
Five different data quality evaluation forms were used depending on the data type and condition of use (COU), as explained in
Appendix M of the 2021 Draft Systematic Review Protocol. All references with data points containing monitoring data (e.g.,
measured occupational exposures) underwent data quality evaluation as described in Section M.6.1, using the monitoring data
quality metrics. All references with data points containing environmental release data (e.g., measured or calculated quantities
of chemical release across facility fence line) underwent data quality evaluation as described in Section M.6.2, using the
environmental release data quality metrics. All references with data points containing published models for environmental
release or occupational exposure (e.g., published models used to calculate occupational exposure or environmental releases)
underwent data quality evaluation as described in Section M.6.3, using the published models for environmental release or
occupational exposure quality metrics. All references with data points containing completed exposure or risk assessments (e.g.,
completed exposure or risk assessments containing a broad range of data types) underwent data quality evaluation as described
in Section M.6.4, using the completed exposure or risk assessments quality metrics. All references with data points containing
reports for data or information other than exposure or release data (e.g., process description) underwent data quality evaluation
as described in Section M.6.5, using the reports for data or information other than exposure or release data quality metrics. The
extracted data and their data quality evaluation are available in the tables below.

Additionally, each data type and condition of use is evaluated independently within a given study; therefore, each reference
may have more than one overall quality determination (OQD) to reflect the quality of each outcome and the exposures and
releases more appropriately as described by the study authors. No OQD is determined for each reference, as a whole, if it
contains data from more than one evidence stream.

Page 2 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

HERO ID	Reference

Occupational Exposure
Monitoring Data

11182955	AkzoNobel, (2018). Priority substance program: Environmental risk assessment for dicyclohexyl phthalate, Akzo Nobel Functional Chem-

icals, Tianjin production and formulation.

812650	Daniels, W. J., Donohue, M. T., Singal, M. (1985). Health Hazard Evaluation Report No. HETA-84-239-1586, Ashland Super Valu,

Ashland, Wisconsin. NIOSH(HETA-84-239-1586):84-239.

4168432	Hahladakis, J. N., Velis, C. A., Weber, R., Iacovidou, E., Purnell, P. (2018). An overview of chemical additives present in plastics:

Migration, release, fate and environmental impact during their use, disposal and recycling. Journal of Hazardous Materials 344:179-199.

1335691	Radian Corp, (1989). Environmental analysis for the Shell Martinez RM-17 incinerator, with cover letter dated 3/15/1991 (sanitized).

59547	Vandervort, R., Brooks, S. M. (1977). Polyvinyl chloride film thermal decomposition products as an occupational illness: I. Environmental

exposures and toxicology. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 19(3): 188-191.

Published Models for Exposures or Releases

11374403	U.S. EPA, (2023). Consumer Exposure Model (CEM) Version 3.2 User's Guide.

Completed Exposure or Risk Assessments

3688160	EC/HC, (2015). State of the science report: Phthalate substance grouping: Medium-chain phthalate esters: Chemical Abstracts Service

Registry Numbers: 84-61-7; 84-64-0; 84-69-5; 523-31-9; 5334-09-8;16883-83-3; 27215-22-1; 27987-25-3; 68515-40-2; 71888-89-6.

5353181	EC/HC, (2017). Draft screening assessment: Phthalate substance grouping.

5080455	Marquart, H., Franken, R., Goede, H., Fransman, W., Schinkel, J. (2017). Validation of the dermal exposure model in ECETOC TRA.

Annals of Work Exposures and Health 61(7):854-871.

3808976	OECD, (2011). Emission scenario document on coating application via spray-painting in the automotive refinishing industry.

3827299	OECD, (2009). Emission scenario document on adhesive formulation.

3827300	OECD, (2013). Emission scenario document on the industrial use of adhesives for substrate bonding.

3840003	OECD, (2010). Emission scenario document on formulation of radiation curable coatings, inks and adhesives.

6311222	Science Applications International Corporation, (1996). Generic scenario for automobile spray coating: Draft report.

10480466	U.S. EPA, (2023). Use of laboratory chemicals - Generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental releases

(Revised draft generic scenario).

11182966	U.S. EPA, (2022). Chemical repackaging - Generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental releases (revised

draft).

3827195	U.S. EPA, (2014). Generic scenario draft on the use of additives in plastic compounding.

6304171	U.S. EPA, (2004). Use of additives in foamed plastics - generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental releases

- Draft.

6311218	U.S. EPA, (2004). Additives in plastics processing (compounding) - generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environ-

mental release - Draft.

Page

13

15

16

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

Page 3 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Table of Contents

6311221	U.S. EPA, (2001). Manufacture and use of printing ink - Generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental releases

(revised draft).

6385709	U.S. EPA, (1999). Flexographic printing - generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental releases: Draft.

6385710	U.S. EPA, (2010). Manufacture and use of printing inks - generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental

releases: Draft.

6385711	U.S. EPA, (2014). Use of additives in the thermoplastic converting industry - generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and

environmental releases.

6385719	U.S. EPA, (2004). Spray coatings in the furniture industry - generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental

releases: Draft.

6385748	U.S. EPA, (2014). Use of additive in plastic compounding - generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental

releases: Draft.

8726956	U.S. EPA, (1994). Generic scenario: Formulation of latex/emulsion coatings.

Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data

11182954	AkzoNobel, (2018). Taskforce executive summary for dicyclohexyl phthalate (TF2).

2816857	Bao, J., Wang, M., Ning, X., Zhou, Y., He, Y., Yang, J., Gao, X., Li, S., Ding, Z., Chen, B. (2015). Phthalate concentrations in personal

care products and the cumulative exposure to female adults and infants in Shanghai. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part
A: Current Issues 78(5):325-341.

1267867	Burgess, W. A. (1991). Potential exposures in the manufacturing industry—Their recognition and control. :595-674.

7349060	Canada,, G.o. (2020). Phthalate substance grouping - Information sheet.

664488	CDC, (2009). Fourth national report on human exposure to environmental chemicals.

5080435	Cherrie, J. W., Semple, S., Brouwer, D. (2004). Gloves and dermal exposure to chemicals: Proposals for evaluating workplace effectiveness.

Annals of Occupational Hygiene 48(7):607-615.

8338316	Giuliani, A., Zuccarini, M., Cichelli, A., Khan, H., Reale, M. (2020). Critical Review on the Presence of Phthalates in Food and Evidence

of Their Biological Impact. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(16): 1-43.

1987638	Guo, Y., Wang, L., Kannan, K. (2014). Phthalates and parabens in personal care products from China: Concentrations and human exposure.

Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 66(1): 113-119.

6558535	Heitbrink, W. (1993). In-depth survey report: Control technology for autobody repair and painting shops at Team Chevrolet, Colorado

Springs, Colorado.

6558536	Heitbrink, W., Cooper, T., Edmonds, M., Bryant, C., Ruch, W. (1993). In-depth survey report: control technology for autobody repair and

painting shops at Valley Paint and Body Shop, Amelia, Ohio.

4728432	Lu, X., Xu, X., Lin, Y., Zhang, Y., Huo, X. (2018). Phthalate exposure as a risk factor for hypertension. Environmental Science and

Pollution Research 25(21):20550-20561.

3222353	Ng, M. G., Tongeren, van, M., Semple, S. (2014). Simulated transfer of liquids and powders from hands and clothing to the mouth. Journal

of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene ll(10):633-644.

5155535	NICNAS, (2016). C4-6 side chain transitional phthalates: Human health tier II assessment.

11147625	OECD, (2004). Test No. 428: Skin absorption: In vitro method.

1598544	Pak, V. M., Mccauley, L. A. (2007). Risks of phthalate exposure among the general population: Implications for occupational health nurses.

American Association of Occupational Health Nurses Journal 55(1): 12-17.

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

Page 4 of 299


-------


PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024



Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

Table of Contents



10472417

RFCI, (2020). Comments of the Resilient Floor Covering Institute (RFCI) on the Safer Products for Washington Priority Consumer
Products draft report to Legislature.

56

11138808

U.S. BLS, (2023). U.S. Census Bureau of Labor Statistics Data from 2021.

57

10293388

U.S. EPA, (2002). Flexographic ink options: A cleaner technologies substitutes assessment. Volume 1.

58

11224653

U.S. EPA, (2013). Updating CEB's method for screening-level estimates of dermal exposure.

59

4532330

U.S. EPA, (1991). Chemical engineering branch manual for the preparation of engineering assessments.

60

4565597

U.S. EPA, (2012). Phthalates action plan.

61

7315971

U.S. EPA, (1995). AP-42: Chapter 11.1 - Flot mix asphalt plants.

62

786546

U.S. EPA, (2011). Exposure factors handbook: 2011 edition.

63

9102546

U.S. EPA, (2002). An evaluation of flexographic inks on wide-web film: Summary booklet.

64

5547263

Wang, Y., Zhu, H., Kannan, K. (2019). A review of biomonitoring of phthalate exposures. Toxics 7(2):21.

65

Environmental Releases





Environmental Release Data



11182955

AkzoNobel, (2018). Priority substance program: Environmental risk assessment for dicyclohexyl phthalate, Akzo Nobel Functional Chem-
icals, Tianjin production and formulation.

66

7330238

ECCC/HC, (2020). Science assessment of plastic pollution.

68

7349020

ERG, (1998). Air emissions inventories, volume 2: Point sources: Chapter 11: Preferred and alternative methods for estimating air
emissions from plastic products manufacturing.

69

3867109

Markiewicz, A., Bjorklund, K., Eriksson, E., Kalmykova, Y., Stromvall, A. M., Siopi, A. (2017). Emissions of organic pollutants from
traffic and roads: Priority pollutants selection and substance flow analysis. Science of the Total Environment 580:1162-1174.

71

1335811

Marx, J. L. (1972). Phthalic acid esters: Biological impact uncertain. Science 46(4056):46-47.

72

6826007

Mersiowsky, N. (2002). Long-term fate of PVC products and their additives in landfills. Progress in Polymer Science 27(10):2227-2277.

73

11360398

Milbrandt, A., Coney, K., Badgett, A., Beckham, G. T. (2022). Quantification and evaluation of plastic waste in the United States.
Resources, Conservation and Recycling 183:106363.

74

5466433

Nunez, C., McMinn, B., Vitas, J. (1996). Barriers to the use of radiation-curable adhesives in the coated and laminated substrate manufac-
turing industry. Journal of Hazardous Materials 45(l):59-78.

75

7348917

OECD, (2011). Resource compendium of PRTR release estimation techniques, part 4: Summary of techniques for releases from products,
version 1.0.

76

6580284

programs, E.O. (1974). Air pollution control engineering and cost study of the paint and varnish industry.

77

1335691

Radian Corp, (1989). Environmental analysis for the Shell Martinez RM-17 incinerator, with cover letter dated 3/15/1991 (sanitized).

79

3859095

Saeed, T., Al-Jandal, N., Abusam, A., Taqi, H., Al-Khabbaz, A., Zafar, J. (2017). Sources and levels of endocrine disrupting compounds
(EDCs) in Kuwait's coastal areas. Marine Pollution Bulletin 118(l-2):407-412.

80

10293388

U.S. EPA, (2002). Flexographic ink options: A cleaner technologies substitutes assessment. Volume 1.

81

6535959

U.S. EPA, (2019). National Emissions Inventory (NEI) [database]: CASRNs 79-00-5, 75-34-3, 107-06-2, 78-87-5, 84-61-7, 106-99-0,
106-93-4, 50-00-0, 85-44-9, 106-46-7, 85-68-7, 84-74-2, and 115-86-6.

Page 5 of 299

82


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Table of Contents

7310513	U.S. EPA, (1995). Chapter 6: Organic chemical process industry. Compilation of air pollutant emission factors. Volume I: Stationary point

and area sources, fifth edition, AP-42.

7315820	U.S. EPA, (1995). Chapter 4.2: Introduction to surface coating. Compilation of air pollutant emission factors. Volume I: Stationary point

and area sources, fifth edition, AP-42.

7315841	U.S. EPA, (1995). Ap-42: Chapter 4.12 - Manufacture of rubber products.

7315971	U.S. EPA, (1995). AP-42: Chapter 11.1 - Hot mix asphalt plants.

59547	Vandervort, R., Brooks, S. M. (1977). Polyvinyl chloride film thermal decomposition products as an occupational illness: I. Environmental

exposures and toxicology. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 19(3): 188-191.

Completed Exposure or Risk Assessments

3688160	EC/HC, (2015). State of the science report: Phthalate substance grouping: Medium-chain phthalate esters: Chemical Abstracts Service

Registry Numbers: 84-61-7; 84-64-0; 84-69-5; 523-31-9; 5334-09-8;16883-83-3; 27215-22-1; 27987-25-3; 68515-40-2; 71888-89-6.

5353181	EC/HC, (2017). Draft screening assessment: Phthalate substance grouping.

3808976	OECD, (2011). Emission scenario document on coating application via spray-painting in the automotive refinishing industry.

3827298	OECD, (2009). Emission scenario documents on coating industry (paints, lacquers and varnishes).

3827299	OECD, (2009). Emission scenario document on adhesive formulation.

3827300	OECD, (2013). Emission scenario document on the industrial use of adhesives for substrate bonding.

3840003	OECD, (2010). Emission scenario document on formulation of radiation curable coatings, inks and adhesives.

5079084	OECD, (2009). Emission scenario document on plastic additives.

6306753	OECD, (2011). Emission scenario document on the chemical industry.

6393282	OECD, (2009). Emission scenario document on transport and storage of chemicals.

6311222	Science Applications International Corporation, (1996). Generic scenario for automobile spray coating: Draft report.

10480466	U.S. EPA, (2023). Use of laboratory chemicals - Generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental releases

(Revised draft generic scenario).

11182966	U.S. EPA, (2022). Chemical repackaging - Generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental releases (revised

draft).

3827195	U.S. EPA, (2014). Generic scenario draft on the use of additives in plastic compounding.

6304171	U.S. EPA, (2004). Use of additives in foamed plastics - generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental releases

- Draft.

6311218	U.S. EPA, (2004). Additives in plastics processing (compounding) - generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environ-

mental release - Draft.

6311221	U.S. EPA, (2001). Manufacture and use of printing ink - Generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental releases

(revised draft).

6385709	U.S. EPA, (1999). Flexographic printing - generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental releases: Draft.

6385710	U.S. EPA, (2010). Manufacture and use of printing inks - generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental

releases: Draft.

6385711	U.S. EPA, (2014). Use of additives in the thermoplastic converting industry - generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and

environmental releases.

83
89

91

92

93

94

95

96

97

98

99

100

101

102

103

104

105

106

107

108

109

110

111

112

113

Page 6 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi phthaiate	Table of Contents

6385719

U.S. EPA, (2004). Spray coatings in the furniture industry - generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental
releases: Draft.

114

6385748

U.S. EPA, (2014). Use of additive in plastic compounding - generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental
releases: Draft.

115

8726956

U.S. EPA, (1994). Generic scenario: Formulation of latex/emulsion coatings.
Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data

116

7349060

Canada,, G.o. (2020). Phthaiate substance grouping - Information sheet.

117

9641570

Canada,, G.o. (2019). Page 5 - Fifth report on human biomonitoring of environmental chemicals in Canada.

118

664488

CDC, (2009). Fourth national report on human exposure to environmental chemicals.

119

10442901

CEPE, (2020). SpERC fact sheet: Industrial application of coatings by spraying.

120

10442902

CEPE, (2020). SpERC fact sheet: Professional application of coatings and inks by spraying.

121

10186827

Cordeiro, C. F., Petrocelli, F. P. (2005). Vinyl acetate polymers.

122

8338316

Giuliani, A., Zuccarini, M., Cichelli, A., Khan, H., Reale, M. (2020). Critical Review on the Presence of Phthalates in Food and Evidence
of Their Biological Impact. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(16): 1-43.

123

4168432

Hahladakis, J. N., Velis, C. A., Weber, R., Iacovidou, E., Purnell, P. (2018). An overview of chemical additives present in plastics:
Migration, release, fate and environmental impact during their use, disposal and recycling. Journal of Hazardous Materials 344:179-199.

124

4728432

Lu, X., Xu, X., Lin, Y., Zhang, Y., Huo, X. (2018). Phthaiate exposure as a risk factor for hypertension. Environmental Science and
Pollution Research 25(21):20550-20561.

125

10472417

RFCI, (2020). Comments of the Resilient Floor Covering Institute (RFCI) on the Safer Products for Washington Priority Consumer
Products draft report to Legislature.

126

9493521

Schripp, T., Wensing, M. (2009). Emission of VOCs and SVOCs from electronic devices and office equipment. :405-430.

127

4565597

U.S. EPA, (2012). Phthalates action plan.

128

9102546

U.S. EPA, (2002). An evaluation of flexographic inks on wide-web film: Summary booklet.

129

9109783

U.S. EPA, (1977). Industrial process profiles for environmental use: Chapter 13. Plasticizers industry.

130

General Engineering Assessment





Completed Exposure or Risk Assessments



3688160

EC/HC, (2015). State of the science report: Phthaiate substance grouping: Medium-chain phthaiate esters: Chemical Abstracts Service
Registry Numbers: 84-61-7; 84-64-0; 84-69-5; 523-31-9; 5334-09-8;16883-83-3; 27215-22-1; 27987-25-3; 68515-40-2; 71888-89-6.

131

1335811

Marx, J. L. (1972). Phthalic acid esters: Biological impact uncertain. Science 46(4056):46-47.

132

3808976

OECD, (2011). Emission scenario document on coating application via spray-painting in the automotive refinishing industry.

133

3827298

OECD, (2009). Emission scenario documents on coating industry (paints, lacquers and varnishes).

134

3827299

OECD, (2009). Emission scenario document on adhesive formulation.

135

3827300

OECD, (2013). Emission scenario document on the industrial use of adhesives for substrate bonding.

136

3840003

OECD, (2010). Emission scenario document on formulation of radiation curable coatings, inks and adhesives.

137

Page 7 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Table of Contents

5079084	OECD, (2009). Emission scenario document on plastic additives.

6306753	OECD, (2011). Emission scenario document on the chemical industry.

6393282	OECD, (2009). Emission scenario document on transport and storage of chemicals.

6311222	Science Applications International Corporation, (1996). Generic scenario for automobile spray coating: Draft report.

10480466	U.S. EPA, (2023). Use of laboratory chemicals - Generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental releases

(Revised draft generic scenario).

11182966	U.S. EPA, (2022). Chemical repackaging - Generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental releases (revised

draft).

3827195	U.S. EPA, (2014). Generic scenario draft on the use of additives in plastic compounding.

6304171	U.S. EPA, (2004). Use of additives in foamed plastics - generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental releases

- Draft.

6311218	U.S. EPA, (2004). Additives in plastics processing (compounding) - generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environ-

mental release - Draft.

6311221	U.S. EPA, (2001). Manufacture and use of printing ink - Generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental releases

(revised draft).

6385709	U.S. EPA, (1999). Flexographic printing - generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental releases: Draft.

6385710	U.S. EPA, (2010). Manufacture and use of printing inks - generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental

releases: Draft.

6385711	U.S. EPA, (2014). Use of additives in the thermoplastic converting industry - generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and

environmental releases.

6385719	U.S. EPA, (2004). Spray coatings in the furniture industry - generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental

releases: Draft.

6385748	U.S. EPA, (2014). Use of additive in plastic compounding - generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental

releases: Draft.

8726956	U.S. EPA, (1994). Generic scenario: Formulation of latex/emulsion coatings.

Reports for Data or Information Other than Exposure or Release Data

10369850	ACA, (2019). Comment submitted by Raleigh Davis, Assistant Director and Riaz Zaman, Counsel, Government Affairs, American Coat-

ings Association (ACA) regarding the proposed 20 high priority candidates for chemical risk evaluation.

6303159	AG, H.D. (2017). HVU2 M8 - M30.

11437783	AG,, Hilti (2022). HVU-TZ M10-M20: Sicherheitsdatenblatt.

11182954	AkzoNobel, (2018). Taskforce executive summary for dicyclohexyl phthalate (TF2).

11182955	AkzoNobel, (2018). Priority substance program: Environmental risk assessment for dicyclohexyl phthalate, Akzo Nobel Functional Chem-
icals, Tianjin production and formulation.

6303148	American Hydrotech Inc (2016). HydroSeal® catalyst.

11360400	APR, (2020). U.S. post-consumer plastic recycling data.

2816857	Bao, J., Wang, M., Ning, X., Zhou, Y., Fie, Y., Yang, J., Gao, X., Li, S., Ding, Z., Chen, B. (2015). Phthalate concentrations in personal

care products and the cumulative exposure to female adults and infants in Shanghai. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part
A: Current Issues 78(5):325-341.

138

139

140

141

142

143

145

146

147

148

149

150

151

152

153

154

155

156
158

160

161

163

165

166

Page 8 of 299


-------
167

169

171

172

173

175

176

177

178

179

180

181

183

184

185

186

188

189

190

191

192

193

195

197

199

200

202

203

204

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Table of Contents

BEIL (2019). Harterpulver 50.

Belgium, Beads (2016). EchoStar 30 BCP tecno.

Buehler (2017). VariDur 200 powder.

Buehler (2018). VariDur 3003 powder.

Burgess, W. A. (1991). Potential exposures in the manufacturing industry—Their recognition and control. :595-674.

Cao, X. L. (2010). Phthalate esters in foods: Sources, occurrence, and analytical methods. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and
Food Safety 9(l):21-43.

Carboline Company (2019). Thermaline 4900 Safety Data Sheet.

CDC, (2009). Fourth national report on human exposure to environmental chemicals.

CEPE, (2020). SpERC fact sheet: Industrial application of coatings by spraying.

CEPE, (2020). SpERC fact sheet: Professional application of coatings and inks by spraying.

CertiPrep,, SPEX (2017). Dicyclohexyl phthalate: Safety data sheet.

ChemRex (2003). EMACO 2020 PART C.

Cordeiro, C. F., Petrocelli, F. P. (2005). Vinyl acetate polymers.

CPSC, (2015). Exposure assessment: Composition, production, and use of phthalates.

CPSC, (2011). Toxicity review of dicyclohexyl phthalate (DCHP).

Devcon/Versachem, I.C. (2008). Duco cement material safety data sheet.

EC/HC, (2017). Draft screening assessment: Phthalate substance grouping.

Electron Microscopy Sciences (2016). JB-4 CATALYST.

Electron Microscopy Sciences (2019). TECHNOVIT 3040 POWDER.

Electron Microscopy Sciences (2018). (2018). MATFIX RESIN.

ENF, (2024). Plastic recycling plants in the United States.

ERG, (1998). Air emissions inventories, volume 2: Point sources: Chapter 11: Preferred and alternative methods for estimating air
emissions from plastic products manufacturing.

Evonik Corporation USA (2012). Protectosil degadeck CSS BPO.

Ford Motor Company, (2015). Metal bonding adhesive.

Giuliani, A., Zuccarini, M., Cichelli, A., Khan, H., Reale, M. (2020). Critical Review on the Presence of Phthalates in Food and Evidence
of Their Biological Impact. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(16): 1-43.

GmbH, H.B. (2015). X60 - A.

GmbH, Kulzer (2017). Technovit 4000 powder.

GmbH, Kulzer (2017). Technovit 7100 hardener 1.

GmbH, L.B. (2015). HistoResin M.M.Pulver.

Page 9 of 299


-------
206

208

210

211

214

215

216

218

220

222

224

226

228

230

231

232

234

235

237

239

241

242

244

246

248

250

251

252

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Table of Contents

GmbH, PERGAN (2018). PEROXAN BP-Pulver 30 W.

GmbH, U.I. (2018). BP-30-FT1.

Guo, Y., Wang, L., Kannan, K. (2014). Phthalates and parabens in personal care products from China: Concentrations and human exposure.
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 66(1): 113-119.

Hahladakis, J. N., Velis, C. A., Weber, R., Iacovidou, E., Purnell, P. (2018). An overview of chemical additives present in plastics:
Migration, release, fate and environmental impact during their use, disposal and recycling. Journal of Hazardous Materials 344:179-199.

Heitbrink, W. (1993). In-depth survey report: Control technology for autobody repair and painting shops at Team Chevrolet, Colorado
Springs, Colorado.

Heitbrink, W., Cooper, T., Edmonds, M., Bryant, C., Ruch, W. (1993). In-depth survey report: control technology for autobody repair and
painting shops at Valley Paint and Body Shop, Amelia, Ohio.

Henry Company (2018). PUMADEQ catalyst.

Hilti (Canada) Corp (2015). HVU M8 - M39.

Inc, Dudick (2015). MH-1 hardener.

Inc, Duro-Last (2019). Duro-Last® liquid-applied flashing catalyst.

Inc, P.F. (2011). Chem-Stud adhesive anchor capsules.

Inc, P.F. (2011). Hammer-CapsuleTM adhesive anchor capsule.

Inc, Siplast (2015). Pro catalyst.

Inc, T.P. (2017). JB-4® plus catalyst: component of 18040 JB-4® plus. 2017.

Inc, U.I. (2018). BENOX C-50.

KG, W.G. (2018). RK-1300 - RK-1500 Activator.

Lerner, I. (2005). European plastics industry moves from 2-EH, DEHP. Chemical Market Reporter 267(26):26-27.

Limited, Sika (2017). Sikafloor® pronto hardener.

LLC, A.G. (2015). ALT catalyst powder.

LLC, Hydro-Gard (2017). Gard-Deck ® hardener 500.

LLC, Vertellus (2018). MORFLEX® 150 (DICYCLOHEXYL PHTHALATE, DCHP) BY VERTELLUS OFFERS PERFORMANCE,
VALUE AND VERSATILITY ACROSS A BREADTH OF APPLICATIONS.

Lord Corporation, (2017). Fusor 108B, 109B Metal Bonding ADH PT B.

Ltd, D.C. (2019). MONOTEK® hardener powder.

Ltd, H.T. (2018). MMA CATALYST.

Ltd, T.I. (2018). TREMCO CP510.

Ltd, T.S. (2013). Polyethylene protection sheet No. 9430.

Lu, X., Xu, X., Lin, Y., Zhang, Y., Huo, X. (2018). Phthalate exposure as a risk factor for hypertension. Environmental Science and
Pollution Research 25(21):20550-20561.

Manville, Johns (2018). JM PMMA catalyst, SeamFree™ catalyst.

Page 10 of 299


-------
254

255

256

258

260

262

263

264

266

267

268

269

270

272

274

276

278

279

280

281

282

283

289

290

291

292

293

294

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Table of Contents

Mersiowsky, N. (2002). Long-term fate of PVC products and their additives in landfills. Progress in Polymer Science 27(10):2227-2277.

Milbrandt, A., Coney, K., Badgett, A., Beckham, G. T. (2022). Quantification and evaluation of plastic waste in the United States.
Resources, Conservation and Recycling 183:106363.

Nobel, Akzo (2017). Perkadox CH-50 safety data sheet.

Nobel, Akzo (2019). Cadox BFF-50 safety data sheet.

Nunez, C., McMinn, B., Vitas, J. (1996). Barriers to the use of radiation-curable adhesives in the coated and laminated substrate manufac-
turing industry. Journal of Hazardous Materials 45(l):59-78.

OECD, (2018). Socio-economic assessment of phthalates.

Pak, V. M., Mccauley, L. A. (2007). Risks of phthalate exposure among the general population: Implications for occupational health nurses.
American Association of Occupational Health Nurses Journal 55(1): 12-17.

programs, E.O. (1974). Air pollution control engineering and cost study of the paint and varnish industry.

Radian Corp, (1989). Environmental analysis for the Shell Martinez RM-17 incinerator, with cover letter dated 3/15/1991 (sanitized).
Restek Corp, (2019). 33227/EPA Method 8061A Phthalate Esters Mixture.

RFCI, (2020). Comments of the Resilient Floor Covering Institute (RFCI) on the Safer Products for Washington Priority Consumer
Products draft report to Legislature.

Rodgers, B., Tallury, S. S., Klingensmith, W. (2016). Rubber compounding. :l-60.

S.A., R. (2015). R-CAS-V.

Sauereisen (2015). 400 Vinyl ester mortar (silica filled), powder.

Shoof International Ltd (2019). Cowslips powder.

Sika Corporation (2017). Sikagard® CRV-20 Part B.

Supply, G.I. (2018). X102452, X102822, X102839, X102840, L-3049.

U.S. BLS, (2023). U.S. Census Bureau of Labor Statistics Data from 2021.

U.S. EPA, (2002). Flexographic ink options: A cleaner technologies substitutes assessment. Volume 1.

U.S. EPA, (2020). 2020 CDR: Commercial and consumer use.

U.S. EPA, (2012). Phthalates action plan.

U.S. EPA, (1995). Chapter 6: Organic chemical process industry. Compilation of air pollutant emission factors. Volume I: Stationary point
and area sources, fifth edition, AP-42.

U.S. EPA, (1995). Chapter 4.2: Introduction to surface coating. Compilation of air pollutant emission factors. Volume I: Stationary point
and area sources, fifth edition, AP-42.

U.S. EPA, (1995). Ap-42: Chapter 4.12 - Manufacture of rubber products.

U.S. EPA, (1995). AP-42: Chapter 11.1 - Hot mix asphalt plants.

U.S. EPA, (2016). Federal research action plan on recycled tire crumb used on playing field and playgrounds. Status report.

U.S. EPA, (2002). An evaluation of flexographic inks on wide-web film: Summary booklet.

U.S. EPA, (1977). Industrial process profiles for environmental use: Chapter 13. Plasticizers industry.

Page 11 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Table of Contents

59547

5547263
5164231

5533553

Vandervort, R., Brooks, S. M. (1977). Polyvinyl chloride film thermal decomposition products as an occupational illness: I. Environmental
exposures and toxicology. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 19(3): 188-191.

Wang, Y., Zhu, H., Kannan, K. (2019). A review of biomonitoring of phthalate exposures. Toxics 7(2):21.

Young, A. S., Allen, J. G., Kim, U. J., Seller, S., Webster, T. F., Kannan, K., Ceballos, D. M. (2018). Phthalate and Organophosphate Plas-
ticizers in Nail Polish: Evaluation of Labels and Ingredients. Environmental Science & Technology 52(21): 12841-12850. [Environmental
science & technology],

Zhang, L.,i, Su, W.,ei, Qian, Y., Zhao, Y., Zhu, Z., Wang, D. (2016). Quantitative detection and impact evaluation of phthalate plasticizers
in insulating oil. IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation 23(6):3429-3434.

295

296

298

299

Page 12 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Occupational Exposure

HERO ID: 11182955 Table: 1 of 2

Study Citation:	AkzoNobel, (2018). Priority substance program: Environmental risk assessment for dicyclohexyl phthalate, Akzo Nobel Functional Chemicals, Tianjin

production and formulation.

HERO ID:	11182955

Conditions of Use: Processing into formulation

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Exposure route:
Area sampling data:
Comments:

Oral, Inhalation.

PEC during processing: 1.52E-04 [mg/mA3]
Local daily intake: 0.0257 [mg/kg-day]





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Sampling and Analytical Methodology

Low

The results are predicted not measured.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Low
High
Low
Low

The data are from a non-OECD country.

The data are for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Report is less than 10 years old but methods used are from 2003.

Distribution of samples is qualitative or characterized by no statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Monitoring data include sample type (e.g., personal breathing zone) but no other meta-
data.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

The monitoring study does not address variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	Low

Page 13 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyclohexyl Phthalate	Occupational Exposure	hero id: i 1182955 Table: 2 of 2

Study Citation:

AkzoNobel, (2018). Priority substance program: Environmental risk assessment for dicyclohexyl phthalate, Akzo Nobel Functional Chemicals, Tianjin



production and formulation.

HERO ID:

11182955

Conditions of Use:

Manufacturing



EXTRACTION

Parameter

Data

Exposure route:	Oral, Inhalation.

Area sampling data:	PEC during manufacturing: 3.46E-07 [mg/mA3]

Comments:	Local daily intake: 0.0123 [mg/kg-day]

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Sampling and Analytical Methodology

Low

Results are not measured but predicted.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Low
High
Low
Low

The data are from a non-OECD country.

The data are for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Report is less than 10 years old but methods used are from 2003.

Distribution of samples is qualitative or characterized by no statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Monitoring data include sample type (e.g., personal breathing zone) but no other meta-
data.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

The monitoring study does not address variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	Low

Page 14 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyclohexyl Phthalate	Occupational Exposure	hero id: 812650 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Daniels, W. J., Donohue, M. T., Singal, M. (1985). Health Hazard Evaluation Report No. HETA-84-239-1586, Ashland Super Valu, Ashland, Wisconsin.

NIOSH(HETA-84-239-1586): 84-239.

HERO ID:	812650

Conditions of Use: Adhesive and Sealants - labels

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Worker activity description:	Meat labeling, meat wrapping

Exposure route:	Inhalation

Physical form:	vapor

Personal sampling data:	DCHP levels were either not detected or below the limit of detection of 20 mg/mA3

Area sampling data:	DCHP levels were either not detected or below the limit of detection of 20 mg/mA3

Exposure duration:	Sample Duration: 130 to 270 minutes

Number of workers:	5

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Sampling and Analytical Methodology

High

Study conducted by NIOSH (NIOSH HHE).

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
Low
Medium

Data is from US.

The data are for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.

Data is from 1984, so more than 20 years old.

Only 1 personal sample and 2 area samples collected.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Monitoring data include most critical metadata, such as sample type, exposure type, and
sample durations, but not exposure frequency and exposure duration.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by taking both personal and area samples but uncertainty is not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 15 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Occupational Exposure

HERO ID: 4168432 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Hahladakis, J. N., Velis, C. A., Weber, R., Iacovidou, E., Purnell, P. (2018). An overview of chemical additives present in plastics: Migration, release, fate

and environmental impact during their use, disposal and recycling, lournal of Hazardous Materials 344:179-199.

HERO ID:	4168432

Conditions of Use: Disposal of plastics

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Area sampling data:	He et al. [182] analyzed the VOC emission characteristics, health risks, and indoor microenvironment exposure during the melting/extrusion stages of the recycling

processes at seven different types of plastic solid waste (PSW). The first group, consisted of both ABS and PS, contained the same monomer; styrene. The total
concentration of VOCs (TVOC) with a mean value ofl .0 ± 0.4 x 10A3mg m—3in the ABS recycling workshop was much higher than that in the PS workshop (4.7
± 1.0 x 10A2mg m—3). Nevertheless, mono-aromatics was the predominant group in both workshops (>84.7%). The second group of PSW included PE and PP,
whose monomers were aliphatic olefins. Results indicated that alkanes are the most abundant VOCs for polyolefins, contributing 50.8% and 37.5% to the PE and
PP recycling VOC emissions, respectively. The third group of PSW included PVC, PA and PC, whose monomers contained heteroatoms. During the extrusion
of these three types of PSW, the TVOC emissions were also much lower than those of the ABS and PS recycling processes, but not so much different from the
PP and PE recycling processes. // Huang et al. [183] demonstrated that the exhaust gases emitted from plastic waste recycling granulation have an effect on the
ambient environment in Xingtan, Guangdong, China [183], Also, PAHs were detected inside and outside of the recycling granulation plants in the area. In the
same study, PAEs were largely distributed in the particle-phase. High levels of DBP and DEHP could be detected inside the plants. The detected DiBP, DnBP and
DEHP inside the Huachang plant were 30, 20 and 5 times greater than background concentrations of the area, respectively.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Sampling and Analytical Methodology

Low

Sampling or analytical methodology is not specified.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:

Geographic Scope

Low

The data are from a non-OECD country, and locality-specific factors (e.g., potentially
greater differences in regulatory occupational exposure limits, industry/ process tech-
nologies) may impact exposures relative to the U.S., or the country of origin is not speci-
fied.

The data are for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation, but
data is general and not specific to DCHP.

The operations, equipment, and worker activities associated with the data are expected
to be representative of current operations, equipment, and activities. The monitoring
data were collected after the most recent permissible exposure limit (PEL) establish-
ment or update or are generally, no more than 10 years old, whichever is shorter. If no
PEL is established, the data are no more than 10 years old. Metadata on the operations,
equipment, and worker activities associated with the data show that the data should be
representative of current operations, equipment, and activities.

Distribution of samples is qualitative or characterized by no statistics.

Metric 3:
Metric 4:

Metric 5:

Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
High

Low

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Monitoring data include sample type (e.g., personal breathing zone) but no other meta-
data.

Continued on next page ...

Page 16 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyclohexyl Phthalate	Occupational Exposure	hero id: 4168432 Table: 1 of 1

... continued from previous page

Study Citation:

HERO ID:
Conditions of Use:

Hahladakis, J. N., Velis, C. A., Weber, R., Iacovidou, E., Purnell, P. (2018). An overview of chemical additives present in plastics: Migration, release, fate

and environmental impact during their use, disposal and recycling. Journal of Hazardous Materials 344:179-199.

4168432

Disposal of plastics

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

Medium The monitoring study provides only limited discussion of the variability in the deter-
minants of exposure for the sampled site or sector. The monitoring study provides only
limited discussion of the uncertainty in the exposure estimates.

Overall Quality Determination

Low



Page 17 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Occupational Exposure

HERO ID: 1335691 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:
HERO ID:
Conditions of Use:

Radian Corp, (1989). Environmental analysis for the Shell Martinez RM-17 incinerator, with cover letter dated 3/15/1991 (sanitized).
1335691

Disposal - Waste incineration

Parameter

EXTRACTION

Data

Exposure route:
Physical form:

Personal sampling data:
Area sampling data:
Engineering control:

inhalation, ingestion
vapor

Estimated ingestion dose of general phthalates was 1.54xlOA-7 mg/kg/day.

Estimated inhalation dose of general phthalates was 2.25xlOA-8 mg/kg/day

air pollution control equipment used for incinerator: quench column, venturi scrubber, packed bed wet scrubber, mist eliminator

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Sampling and Analytical Methodology

High

Report uses high quality data, techniques and methods that are from the EPA and do not
indicate flaws or quality issues

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Low
Low

Data is from the US

Data contains general phthalate emissions and exposures but does not contain informa-
tion specific to DCHP. Data could possibly be used as analogous data
Assessment is more than 20 years old.

Characterized by no statistics

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Provides results but the underlying methods, data sources and assumptions are not fully
transparent

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Does not address variability or uncertainty

Overall Quality Determination

Low

Page 18 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Occupational Exposure

HERO ID: 59547 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Vandervort, R., Brooks, S. M. (1977). Polyvinyl chloride film thermal decomposition products as an occupational illness: I. Environmental exposures and

toxicology. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 19(3): 188-191.

HERO ID:	59547

Conditions of Use: PVC film and label adhesive in meat packing

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Worker activity description:
Exposure route:

Physical form:

Number of workers:

Meat wrapper in supermarkets, rest are in butchershops and packing houses,
vapor

film and label adhesive - upon heating turns into vapor

Between 75,000 and 100,000 persons employed as meat wrappers in the US.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Sampling and Analytical Methodology

High

Source is peer reviewed so likely contains high quality data.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Low
Low

Data is for US

Data is applicable to commercial use of PVC film and adhesives. No DCHP specific
data

Data is over 20 years old (1977).

Not characterized by statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Contains worker activity, exposure route, physical form, emissions, chemical concentra-
tion.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Does not address variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 19 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Occupational Exposure

HERO ID: 11374403 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:
HERO ID:
Conditions of Use:

U.S. EPA, (2023). Consumer Exposure Model (CEM) Version 3.2 User's Guide.

11374403

All COUs



Parameter

EXTRACTION

Data



Dermal exposure data:

Dermal exposure data



Domain

EVALUATION

Metric Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1: Methodology	Medium The model is free of mathematical errors and is based on scientifically sound approaches

or methods. However, equations and choice of parameter values are not fully described
and some equations and/or parameter values may not be appropriate for the model's
application.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2: Geographic Scope	Medium The model was developed by an OECD country other than the U.S.

Metric 3: Applicability	High	The model can be appropriately applied to an occupational scenario within the scope of

the risk evaluation.

Metric 4: Temporal Representativeness	Medium The model is based on data that are generally more than 10 years but no more than 20

years old.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 5:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Model approach, equations, and choice of parameter values are transparent. However,
rationale for selection of approach, equations, and parameter values is not provided.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

The source has limited discussion of variability and uncertainty of the model.

Overall Quality Determination

Medium





Page 20 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Occupational Exposure

HERO ID: 3688160 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	EC/HC, (2015). State of the science report: Phthalate substance grouping: Medium-chain phthalate esters: Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Numbers:

84-61-7; 84-64-0; 84-69-5; 523-31-9; 5334-09-8;16883-83-3; 27215-22-1; 27987-25-3; 68515-40-2; 71888-89-6.

HERO ID:	3688160

Conditions of Use: Ambient air concentration, indoor air and dust concentration

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Area sampling data:	In ambient air, DCHP was not detected at industrial and rural sites in California (MDL: 1 ng/m3) (p. 101). DCHP has been detected in indoor air (both volatile

and particulate matter) in one survey of homes conducted in Cape Cod, USA (21% of 102 homes; arithmetic mean: 3.4; median: ND; 90th percentilel4: 210;
range: ND-280 ng/m3) (Rudel et al. 2003) (p. 102).

Dermal exposure data:	Dermal exposure data

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods
that are from a frequently used source (e.g., European Union or OECD reports, NIOSH
HHEs, journal articles, Kirk-Othmer) and are generally accepted by the scientific com-
munity, and associated information does not indicate flaws or quality issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness

Medium
Low

High

The data are from an OECD country other than the U.S. (Canada).

The assessment is for a non-occupational scenario that is similar to an occupational
scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation, such as a consumer DIY scenario that is
similar to a worker scenario.

The assessment captures operations, equipment, and worker activities expected to be
representative of current conditions. EPA has no reason to believe exposures have
changed. The completed exposure or risk assessment is generally no more than 10 years
old.

Distribution of samples is characterized by a range with uncertain statistics. It is unclear
if analysis is representative.

Metric 5:

Sample Size

Medium

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

Assessment or report clearly documents its data sources, assessment methods, results,
and assumptions.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

High

The assessment addresses variability and uncertainty in the results. Uncertainty is well
characterized.

Overall Quality Determination

High





Page 21 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Occupational Exposure

HERO ID: 5353181 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:

EC/HC, (2017), Draft screening assessment: Phthalate substance grouping.

HERO ID:

5353181

Conditions of Use:

Indoor air, food and consumer products



EXTRACTION

Parameter

Data

Exposure route:	oral, inhalation, dermal

Physical form:	dust

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Report uses high quality data from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
Low
High
N/A

Data are from Canada, an OECD country.

Data are for consumer uses, which may be similar to commercial uses.

Assessment is based on current industry conditions and data no more than 10 years old.

No sample data.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

N/A

No scope to address variability and scope.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 22 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyclohexyl Phthalate	Occupational Exposure	hero id: 5080455 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Marquart, H., Franken, R., Goede, H., Fransman, W., Schinkel, J. (2017). Validation of the dermal exposure model in ECETOC TRA. Annals of Work

Exposures and Health 61(7):854-871.

HERO ID:	5080455

Conditions of Use: All COUs

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Dermal exposure data:

Dermal exposure data





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The report uses high quality data that are from frequently used sources and are generally
accepted by the scientific community, and associated information does not indicate flaws
or quality issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
High
High
N/A

The data are from an OECD country other than the U.S.

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
The report is generally no more than 10 years old.

No sample size data applicable for protection factor.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Report clearly documents results, methods, and assumptions. Data sources are generally
described but not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

The report does not address variability or uncertainty in protection factors.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 23 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Occupational Exposure

HERO ID: 3808976 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	OECD, (2011). Emission scenario document on coating application via spray-painting in the automotive refinishing industry.

HERO ID:	3808976

Conditions of Use: Use - Automotive Coating Application

EXTRACTION

Parameter

Data





Worker activity description:
Exposure route:

Exposure frequency:

Number of workers:

Personal protective equipment:

transferring and mixing liquid products, container/equipment cleaning, transferring mixed coating to application equipment, overspray

dermal and inhalation, dermal: Provides methods for modeling exposures to non-volatile liquids Inhalation: Provides methods for modeling exposures to mists,
dermal: surrogate measured skin loading conditions inhalation: 8-hr TWA surrogate data
Exposure frequency: 250 days/yr
8 workers/site

air-purifying respirators or air-supplied respirators, Gloves (typically latex or nitrile), paint suits, and face masks/eye protection

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Low
Medium

This ESD was developed by EPA based on U.S. data

Data is for multiple in-scope occupational scenarios; however, data is general and not
specific to a chemical.

Assessment is based on data greater than 20 years old.

Sample distribution characterized by limited statistics (min, max, mean) but discrete
samples not provided and distribution not fully characterized.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering multiple coating types.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 24 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Occupational Exposure

HERO ID: 3827299 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	OECD, (2009). Emission scenario document on adhesive formulation.

HERO ID:	3827299

Conditions of Use: Processing: Adhesives and sealants

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Worker activity description:
Exposure route:

Exposure frequency:
Number of workers:

Unloading, container cleaning, mixing operations, sampling, equipment cleaning, packaging

dermal and inhalation, dermal: Provides methods for modeling exposures to both solids and non-volatile liquids Inhalation: Provides methods for modeling
exposures to both solids and volatile liquids
Exposure frequency: days/yr equal to number of bt/yr
22 workers/site

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Medium
Medium

This ESD was developed by EPA based on U.S. data

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Assessment is generally based on data greater than 10 years old but no more than 20
years old and industry conditions that are expected to be representative of current indus-
try conditions.

Distribution of samples is characterized by a range with uncertain statistics. It is unclear
if analysis is representative.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering various chemical func-
tions and types of adhesives.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 25 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Occupational Exposure

HERO ID: 3827300 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:
HERO ID:
Conditions of Use:

OECD, (2013). Emission scenario document on the industrial use of adhesives for substrate bonding.
3827300

Use of adhesives for substrate bonding

Parameter

EXTRACTION

Data

Worker activity description:
Exposure route:

Exposure frequency:

Number of workers:

Personal protective equipment:
Engineering control:

unloading, container cleaning, adhesive application, equipment cleaning, curing/drying

dermal and inhalation, dermal: Provides methods for modeling exposures to solids and non-volatile liquids Inhalation: Provides methods for modeling exposures
to mists, vapor and volatile liquids
Exposure Frequency: 50-250 days/yr
26-106 workers/site

chemical-resistant gloves and safety glasses. Heat-resistant gloves are used when applying hot-melt adhesives
Spray booths

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Medium
Medium

This ESD was developed by EPA based on U.S. data

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Assessment is generally based on data greater than 10 years old but no more than 20
years old and industry conditions that are expected to be representative of current indus-
try conditions.

Sample distribution characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering various chemical func-
tions, types of adhesives, and end use markets.

Overall Quality Determination

High

Page 26 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Occupational Exposure

HERO ID: 3840003 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:
HERO ID:
Conditions of Use:

OECD, (2010). Emission scenario document on formulation of radiation curable coatings, inks and adhesives.
3840003

Processing: Paints and Coatings

Parameter

EXTRACTION

Data

Worker activity description:
Exposure route:

Exposure frequency:

Number of workers:

Personal protective equipment:

Unloading, container cleaning, sampling, equipment cleaning, filter media changeout, packaging

dermal and inhalation, dermal: Provides methods for modeling exposures to both solids and non-volatile liquids Inhalation: Provides methods for modeling
exposures to both solids and volatile liquids
Exposure Frequency: 250 days/yr
18-39 workers/site

fabric or non-woven long sleeved shirts and pants, coveralls, and neoprene or rubber gloves. Barrier creams may be used to facilitate hand washing when materials
or products penetrate gloves or other PPE. A rubber apron or rubber suit and rubber boots may also be worn in cases where there is potential for splashing on or
penetration through clothing

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Low
Medium

This ESD was developed by EPA based on U.S. data

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Assessment is based on data greater than 20 years old.

Distribution of samples is characterized by a range with uncertain statistics. It is unclear
if analysis is representative.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering various chemical func-
tions and types of UV curable products.

Overall Quality Determination

Medium

Page 27 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyclohexyl Phthalate	Occupational Exposure	hero id: 63i 1222 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Science Applications International Corporation, (1996). Generic scenario for automobile spray coating: Draft report.

HERO ID:	6311222

Conditions of Use: Automotive Coating Application

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Worker activity description:	Auto OEM: robotics operations, paint mixing, paint booth cleaning, inspection, and manual "touch-up" painting. Autorefinish: wat sanding, car washing, stripping

(paint removal), machine sanding, blowing, buffing, polishing, paint spraying, paint and primer mixing, and inspection.

Exposure route:	dermal and inhalation

Personal sampling data:	Provides methods for modeling exposures to mists

Dermal exposure data:	Dermal exposure data

Exposure frequency:	Auto OEM: 250 days/yr. Autorefinish: 170 days/yr.

Number of workers:	Auto OEM: 17 workers/site. Autorefinish: 4-10 workers/site.

Engineering control:	Spray booths

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Low
Medium

This GS is based on U.S. data

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Assessment is based on data greater than 20 years old.

Sample distribution characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering OEM and refinish ap-
plications.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 28 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyclohexyl Phthalate	Occupational Exposure	hero id: 10480466 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	U.S. EPA, (2023). Use of laboratory chemicals - Generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental releases (Revised draft generic

scenario).

HERO ID:	10480466

Conditions of Use: Use - Laboratory Chemicals

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Worker activity description:
Exposure route:

Physical form:

Exposure duration:

Exposure frequency:

Number of workers:

Personal protective equipment:

Engineering control:

Container unloading (liquids and solids), container cleaning, equipment cleaning, laboratory analyses, disposal of laboratory chemicals

Dermal, Inhalation; dermal: Provides methods for modeling exposures to non-volatile and volatile liquids and solidslnhalation: Provides methods for modeling

exposures to non-volatile and volatile liquids and solids

Liquid or solid

8-12 hr/day

250 days/yr

3 workers/facility and 3 ONUs/facility

Basic PPE includes wearing long sleeves (lab coats), long pants, closed-toe shoes, safety glasses or goggles, and gloves during the use of laboratory chemicals.
Additional PPE may be worn depending on the level of hazard or specifics of the process.

Fume hood

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High Basic PPE includes wearing long sleeves (lab coats), long pants, closed-toe shoes, safety
glasses or goggles, and gloves during the use of laboratory chemicals. Additional PPE
may be worn depending on the level of hazard or specifics of the process.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

High
Medium

This GS is based on U.S. data

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Assessment is based on current industry conditions and data no more than 10 years old.
Sample distribution characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Variability and uncertainty are not addressed.

Overall Quality Determination

High





Page 29 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Occupational Exposure

HERO ID: 11182966 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:
HERO ID:
Conditions of Use:

U.S. EPA, (2022). Chemical repackaging - Generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental releases (revised draft).

11182966

Repackaging

Parameter

EXTRACTION

Data

Worker activity description:
Exposure route:

Physical form:

Area sampling data:

Dermal exposure data:
Exposure duration:

Exposure frequency:

Number of workers:

Personal protective equipment:
Engineering control:

Unloading transport containers, container cleaning, equipment cleaning, loading of transport containers.
Dermal, Inhalation
Liquid or solid

Inhalation: Provides methods for modeling exposures to non-volatile and volatile liquids and solids.
Dermal exposure data
8-12 hr/day

The number of operating days is given in a range of 174-260 days/yr with an EPA default of 260 days/yr.
3 workers/facility and 1 ONUs/facility (total number of employees and facilities given in Table 5-3).
Commonly used PPE includes safety glasses, face shields, aprons, and gloves.

Local exhaust ventilation.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality information/data from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:

Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Medium

High

This GS is based on U.S. data.

Data are for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Assessment is based on data greater than 10 years old but no more than 20 years old and
industry conditions that are expected to be representative of current industry conditions.
Statistical distribution of samples is fully characterized (discrete use amounts provided).

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering multiple worker activi-
ties.

Overall Quality Determination

High

Page 30 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Occupational Exposure

HERO ID: 3827195 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	U.S. EPA, (2014). Generic scenario draft on the use of additives in plastic compounding.

HERO ID:	3827195

Conditions of Use: Plastics Compounding

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Worker activity description:
Exposure route:

Personal sampling data:
Dermal exposure data:
Exposure frequency:
Number of workers:
Engineering control:

Unloading and charging additives to process, container cleaning, equipment cleaning, and compounding processes
dermal and inhalation

Provides methods for modeling exposures to both solids and volatile liquids
nan

148-264 days/yr
24 workers/site
Forced ventilation

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Medium
Low

This GS is based on U.S. data

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Assessment is generally based on data greater than 10 years old but no more than 20
years old and industry conditions that are expected to be representative of current indus-
try conditions.

Model results characterized by no statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering multiple plastic and
additive types.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 31 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Occupational Exposure

HERO ID: 6304171 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:

U.S. EPA, (2004). Use of additives in foamed plastics - generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental releases - Draft.

HERO ID:

6304171

Conditions of Use:

Flexible and Rigid Polyurethane Foam Manufacture



EXTRACTION

Parameter

Data

Worker activity description:	transfer from shipping containers, operation/supervision of the foam mix head/dispenser, foam production, transfer/handling of foamed articles (see page 14 of 19

for more details on each)
dermal and inhalation (page 14 of 19)
liquid, vapor, possibly powders (page 14 of 19)
data suggests 8 hr/day on average (page 12 of 19)

250 days/yr (assumption, page 12 of 19)

polystyrene foam production sites employ a total of27,479 production workers. Polyurethane and other plastic foam production sitesemploy a total of 27,884
production workers. In both cases <50 workers/site. (Page 12 of 19)

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High

Medium
Medium

This GS is based on U.S. data

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Assessment is generally based on data greater than 10 years old but no more than 20
years old and industry conditions that are expected to be representative of current indus-
try conditions.

Number of workers characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering multiple foam types.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Exposure route:
Physical form:
Exposure duration:
Exposure frequency:
Number of workers:

Page 32 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Occupational Exposure

HERO ID: 6311218 Table: 1 of 1

U.S. EPA, (2004). Additives in plastics processing (compounding) - generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental release -

Draft.

6311218

Processing as a reactant as a process regulator for Plastic material and resin manufacturing; incorporation into formulation, mixture,
or reaction product as a plasticizer for Plastics product manufacturing; incorporation into article as a plasticizer for Plastics product
manufacturing

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Worker activity description:
Exposure route:

Personal sampling data:
Dermal exposure data:
Exposure duration:
Exposure frequency:
Number of workers:
Comments:

Unloading and charging additives to process, container cleaning, equipment cleaning, and compounding processes
dermal and inhalation

Provides methods for modeling exposures to both solids and volatile liquids
Dermal exposure data
8 hr/day
250 days/yr
24 workers/site

QC Note: This is an early draft of the Plastic Compounding GS and may not provide the most up to data info

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Medium
Low

This GS is based on U.S. data

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Assessment is generally based on data greater than 10 years old but no more than 20
years old and industry conditions that are expected to be representative of current indus-
try conditions.

Model results characterized by no statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering multiple plastic types,
additive types, and worker activities.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Study Citation:

HERO ID:
Conditions of Use:

Page 33 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyclohexyl Phthalate	Occupational Exposure	hero id: 63i 1221 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	U.S. EPA, (2001). Manufacture and use of printing ink - Generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental releases (revised draft).

HERO ID:	6311221

Conditions of Use: Formulation and Use of Printing Inks

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Worker activity description:	PROC: unloading, cleaning, packagingUSE: Printing operations, unloading

Exposure route:	dermal and inhalation

Personal sampling data:	PROC: Inhalation: Provides methods for modeling exposures to volatile liquids and solidsUSE: Inhalation: Provides methods for modeling exposures to volatile

liquids and solids

Dermal exposure data:	Dermal exposure data

Exposure frequency:	PROC: 250 days/yrUSE: 250 days/yr

Number of workers:	PROC: 13-22 workers/siteUSE: 16-43 workers/site

Comments:	QC Note: This is an early draft of the Printing Ink GS and may not provide the most up to data info

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Low
Medium

This GS is based on U.S. data

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Assessment is based on data greater than 20 years old.

Sample distribution characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering multiple printing appli-
cations, and multiple chemical functions

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 34 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Occupational Exposure

HERO ID: 6385709 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	U.S. EPA, (1999). Flexographic printing - generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental releases: Draft.

HERO ID:	6385709

Conditions of Use: Flexographic Printing

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Worker activity description:
Exposure route:

Area sampling data:

Dermal exposure data:
Exposure duration:
Exposure frequency:
Number of workers:

Transferring and mixing inks, adjusting ink cans at the press, operating the press,
dermal and inhalation.

Inhalation: Provides methods for modeling exposures to volatile liquids.

Dermal exposure data

4-7.5 hrs/shift.

300 days/yr.

27 workers/site.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Low
Medium

This GS is based on U.S. data.

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Assessment is based on data greater than 20 years old.

Distribution of samples is characterized by a range with uncertain statistics. It is unclear
if analysis is representative.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Assessment or report clearly documents results, methods, and assumptions. Data
sources are generally described but not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

The assessment does not address variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 35 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Occupational Exposure

HERO ID: 6385710 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:
HERO ID:
Conditions of Use:

U.S. EPA, (2010). Manufacture and use of printing inks - generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental releases: Draft.
6385710

Formulation and Use of Printing Inks

Parameter

EXTRACTION

Data

Worker activity description:

Exposure route:
Physical form:
Number of workers:

PROC: Unloading, formulation (dispersion and milling), equipment cleaning, packaging. Workers are likely to encounter both inhalation and dermal exposure
during handling of raw materials and ink products as well as equipment cleaning.USE: Unloading, printing operations and ink drying, equipment cleaning.
Inhalation exposure among production workers is likely to occur as a result of potential emissions with major contributions coming from ink handling and ink
mist generation from printing equipment. Dermal exposure to inks and cleaning solvents are expected during material unloading and cleaning of the printing
equipment.

Inhalation and dermal

PROC: Liquid, solid particulateUSE: Liquid, mist

See Table 2-2: Total number of workers is 64,973, with the number of workers for each printing type varying from -13,000 to -225,000

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Medium
Medium

This GS is based on U.S. data

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

The GS is more than 10 years but no more than 20 years old.

Sample distribution characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability not addressed.

Overall Quality Determination

Medium

Page 36 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Occupational Exposure

HERO ID: 6385711 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:

HERO ID:
Conditions of Use:

U.S. EPA, (2014). Use of additives in the thermoplastic converting industry - generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental

releases.

6385711

Plastics Converting

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Worker activity description:
Exposure route:

Dermal exposure data:
Exposure frequency:
Number of workers:

Unloading and charging compounded resins to process, converting processes, converting equipment cleaning, trimming processes

Dermal and inhalation. Provides inhalation methods for modeling exposures to solids.

Dermal exposure data

137-254 days/yr

30-69 workers/site

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Medium
Medium

This GS is based on U.S. data

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Assessment is generally based on data greater than 10 years old but no more than 20
years old and industry conditions that are expected to be representative of current indus-
try conditions.

Distribution of samples is characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering multiple plastic types,
additive types, and worker activities.

Overall Quality Determination

High

Page 37 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Occupational Exposure

HERO ID: 6385719 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:
HERO ID:
Conditions of Use:

U.S. EPA, (2004). Spray coatings in the furniture industry - generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental releases: Draft.
6385719

Commercial Use: Furniture Coating Application

Parameter

EXTRACTION

Data

Worker activity description:
Exposure route:

Physical form:

Personal sampling data:
Dermal exposure data:
Exposure frequency:

Number of workers:

Personal protective equipment:
Engineering control:

unloading, spray application, equipment cleaning

dermal and inhalation

liquid

Inhalation: Provides methods for modeling exposures to mists.

Dermal exposure data
250 days/yr
12-98 workers/site

Air-supplied full face piece respirator; Disposable overalls and head covering; Gloves specific to the chemicals used; and boots and boot coverings
Spray booths

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Low
Medium

This GS is based on U.S. data

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Assessment is based on data greater than 20 years old.

Distribution of samples is characterized by a range.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering various chemical func-
tions and wood vs metal furniture uses.

Overall Quality Determination

Medium

Page 38 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Occupational Exposure

HERO ID: 6385748 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	U.S. EPA, (2014). Use of additive in plastic compounding - generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental releases: Draft.

HERO ID:	6385748

Conditions of Use: Processing - Additive in Plastic Compounding

EXTRACTION

Parameter

Data





Worker activity description:
Exposure route:

Exposure frequency:
Number of workers:
Engineering control:

Unloading and charging additives to process, container cleaning, equipment cleaning, and compounding processes

dermal and inhalation, dermal: Provides methods for modeling exposures to both solids and non-volatile liquids Inhalation: Provides methods for modeling

exposures to both solids and volatile liquids

Exposure Frequency: 148-264 days/yr

24 workers/site

Forced ventilation

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Medium
Medium

This GS is based on U.S. data

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Assessment is generally based on data greater than 10 years old but no more than 20
years old and industry conditions that are expected to be reasonably representative of
current industry conditions.

Distribution of samples is characterized by a range with uncertain statistics. It is unclear
if analysis is representative.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering multiple plastic types,
additive types, and worker activities.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 39 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Occupational Exposure

HERO ID: 8726956 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	U.S. EPA, (1994). Generic scenario: Formulation of latex/emulsion coatings.

HERO ID:	8726956

Conditions of Use: Processing - incorporation into formulation, mixture, or reaction product for Paint and coating manufacturing (specifically latex/emulsion
coatings)

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Worker activity description:

Exposure route:

Personal sampling data:
Dermal exposure data:
Number of workers:

component loading and trransfer operations, addition of mix tanks, final transfer of the latex formulation into cans or other containers, and disposal and handling
of the solid and liquid wastes
Dermal, Inhalation

Inhalation: Provides methods for modeling exposures to volatile liquids and solids
nan

1 worker/site

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality information/data from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Low
Medium

This GS is based on U.S. data

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Assessment is based on data greater than 20 years old.

Sample distributions characterized by ranges/estimations with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented, but underlying data sources
are not fully transparent

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering different chemical
physical forms.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 40 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Occupational Exposure

HERO ID: 11182954 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	AkzoNobel, (2018). Taskforce executive summary for dicyclohexyl phthalate (TF2).

HERO ID:	11182954

Conditions of Use: Manufacture

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Worker activity description:
Physical form:

Exposure duration:

Personal protective equipment:
Engineering control:

Manufacture, chemical production, transfer of manufactured chemical into small containers, mixing or blending,
solid

<= 8 hours/day

Respirator with type A/P2 filter or better, eye protection or face shield, and chemical resistant gloves, coveralls.

Enhanced general ventilation, handle substance in closed system with extract ventilation, fill and transfer materials with extract ventilation present.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

Medium

Report uses high quality data/techniques/methods that are not from frequently-used
sources and there are no known quality issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Low
High
High
N/A

Data are from China, a non-OECD country.

Data are for manufacture, an in-scope occupational scenario.

Report is based on current industry conditions and data no more than 10 years old.

N/A - No sample data.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented, but underlying data sources
are not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

N/A

N/A - No sample data.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 41 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Occupational Exposure

HERO ID: 2816857 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Bao, J., Wang, M., Ning, X., Zhou, Y., He, Y., Yang, J., Gao, X., Li, S., Ding, Z., Chen, B. (2015). Phthalate concentrations in personal care products and

the cumulative exposure to female adults and infants in Shanghai. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A: Current Issues 78(5):325-341.
HERO ID:	2816857

Conditions of Use: Use of Personal care products

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Dermal exposure data:

nan





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1: Methodology	High	The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods

that are from frequently used sources (e.g., European Union or OECD reports, NIOSH
HHEs, journal articles, Kirk-Othmer) and are generally accepted by the scientific com-
munity, and associated information does not indicate flaws or quality issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:

Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Low	The data are from a non-OECD country, and locality-specific factors (e.g., potentially

greater differences in regulatory occupational exposure or emission limits, industry/pro-
cess technologies) may impact exposures or releases relative to the U.S., or the country
of origin is not specified.

Uninformative	The report is from an occupational or non-occupationalscenario that does not apply to

any occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.

High	The report captures operations, equipment, and worker activities expected to be repre-

sentative of current conditions. The report is generally no more than 10 years old.

Medium	Distribution of samples is characterized by a range with uncertain statistics. It is unclear

if analysis is representative.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

Assessment or report clearly documents its data sources, assessment methods, results,
and assumptions.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

High

The report addresses variability and uncertainty in the results. Uncertainty is well char-
acterized.

Overall Quality Determination

Uninformative





Page 42 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Occupational Exposure

HERO ID: 1267867 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Burgess, W. A. (1991). Potential exposures in the manufacturing industry—Their recognition and control. :595-674.

HERO ID:	1267867

Conditions of Use: Painting and manufacturing and processing of rubber products

Parameter

EXTRACTION

Data

Worker activity description:
Exposure route:

Area sampling data:

Personal protective equipment:
Engineering control:

Workers involved in painting and manufacturing and processing of rubber products
Inhalation

In a review of solvent exposures in Danish manufacturing and service industries, a series of 72 air sampling measurements were conducted during spray painting
(W) . 38 percent of the mixed solvent exposures exceeded 0.25 of the ACGIH Threshold Limit value, 29% were between 025 and 1.0 of the ACGIH TLV-TWA
and 33% exceeded the combined ACGIH TLV-TWA.

Respiratory protection for painters

Painting: Control techniques include replacement of solvent-based paints with water-based paints, altering the application techniques, modifying workplace
design, work practice, and medical surveillance, ventilation, and providing respiratory protection to the workers. Rubber products: Control techniques include use
of low dusting forms of the chemicals, use of coarser form of the material to reduce dust, dipping the stock in water slurry, replacement of benzene with white
gasoline, providing adequate local ventilation.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

report uses high quality data

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Low
N/A

The data are from the United States

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Doesn't mention DCHP specifically
Article is from 1991

This metric is not applicable to the data being extracted

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

Assessment or report clearly documents its data sources

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

N/A

This metric is not applicable to the data being extracted

Overall Quality Determination

High

Page 43 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Occupational Exposure

HERO ID: 7349060 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:

Canada,, G.o. (2020). Phthalate substance grouping - Information sheet.

HERO ID:

7349060

Conditions of Use:

Plastic and rubber products not covered elsewhere



EXTRACTION

Parameter

Data

Exposure route:	Canadians may be exposed to these substances from food, including breast milk, environmental sources (for example, dust and for certain phthalates, indoor air),

and contact with plastic items. Canadians may also be exposed to some of these substances as a result of using certain cosmetics and natural health care products
(for example, diaper creams, body lotions, and hairsprays) (p. 4 of 10).

Comments:	DCHP specifically mentioned as one of the substances of concern.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

Low

The data, data sources, and/or techniques or methods used in the assessment or report
are not specified.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:

Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
Low

High

N/A

Report is from Canada.

The report is for a non-occupational scenario that is similar to an occupational scenario
within the scope of the risk evaluation (exposure to plastic products)

The report captures operations, equipment, and worker activities expected to be repre-
sentative of current conditions. The report is generally no more than 10 years old.

Data is qualitative.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Assessment or report provides results, but the underlying methods, data sources, and
assumptions are not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

The report does not address variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	Low

Page 44 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Occupational Exposure

HERO ID: 664488 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	CDC, (2009). Fourth national report on human exposure to environmental chemicals.

HERO ID:	664488

Conditions of Use: Use of consumer articles

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Exposure route:	People are exposed through ingestion, inhalation, and, to a lesser extent, dermal contact with products that contain phthalates. workers may be exposed to higher

air phthalate concentrations than the general population.

EVALUATION

Domain	Metric	Rating	Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1: Methodology	High	The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods

that are from frequently used sources (e.g., European Union or OECD reports, NIOSH
HHEs, journal articles, Kirk-Othmer) and are generally accepted by the scientific com-
munity, and associated information does not indicate flaws or quality issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:

Metric 3:

Metric 4:

Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High	The data are from the United States and are representative of the industry being evalu-

ated.

Low	The report is for a non-occupational scenario that is similar to an occupational scenario

within the scope of the risk evaluation, such as a consumer DIY scenario that is similar
to a worker scenario.

Medium The report captures operations, equipment, and worker activities that are expected to be
reasonably representative of current conditions. The report is generally more than 10
years but no more than 20 years old.

N/A	Information is qualitative

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Assessment or report clearly documents results, methods, and assumptions. Data
sources are generally described but not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

The report provides only limited discussion of the variability and uncertainty in the
results.

Overall Quality Determination

Medium





Page 45 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyclohexyl Phthalate	Occupational Exposure	hero id: 5080435 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Cherrie, J. W., Semple, S., Brouwer, D. (2004). Gloves and dermal exposure to chemicals: Proposals for evaluating workplace effectiveness. Annals of

Occupational Hygiene 48(7):607-615.

HERO ID:	5080435

Conditions of Use: All COUs

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Dermal exposure data:

Dermal exposure data





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The report uses high quality data that are from frequently used sources and are generally
accepted by the scientific community, and associated information does not indicate flaws
or quality issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium

High
Medium
N/A

The data are from an OECD country other than the U.S.

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
The report is generally more than 10 years but no more than 20 years old.
No sample size applicable to the proposed conceptual model.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

Report clearly documents its data sources, assessment methods, results, and assump-
tions.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

High

Uncertainty and variability of glove protection factors are covered in the study.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 46 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Occupational Exposure

HERO ID: 8338316 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Giuliani, A., Zuccarini, M., Cichelli, A., Khan, H., Reale, M. (2020). Critical Review on the Presence of Phthalates in Food and Evidence of Their

Biological Impact. International lournal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(16): 1-43.

HERO ID:	8338316

Conditions of Use: General

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Exposure route:	different routes (i.e., ingestion, inhalation, dermal, or iatrogenicexposure)

Physical form:	almost colorless, odorless oily liquids

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Peer reviewed and published journal article.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:

Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
High
High

N/A

Data from a OECD country, Italy.

The data are for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
The operations, equipment, and worker activities associated with the data are expected
to be representative of current operations, equipment, and activities. The data are no
more than 10 years old.

N/A- no sampling data

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

Assessment or report clearly documents its data sources, assessment methods, results,
and assumptions.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

The report does not address variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 47 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyclohexyl Phthalate	Occupational Exposure	hero id: 1987638 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Guo, Y., Wang, L., Kannan, K. (2014). Phthalates and parabens in personal care products from China: Concentrations and human exposure. Archives of

Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 66(1): 113-119.

HERO ID:	1987638

Conditions of Use: commercial use

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Exposure route:
Physical form:

Dermal exposure data:

inhalation, dietary intake, and dermal absorption
mixed with personal care products
Dermal exposure data



Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

report uses high quality data

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Low
Low

High
Low

The data are from a non-OECD country

The report is for a non-occupational scenario that is similar to an occupational scenario

within the scope of the risk evaluation

The report is generally no more than 10 years old.

characterized by no statistics

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

report clearly documents its data sources

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

The report does not address variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 48 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyclohexyl Phthalate	Occupational Exposure	hero id: 6558535 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Heitbrink, W. (1993). In-depth survey report: Control technology for autobody repair and painting shops at Team Chevrolet, Colorado Springs, Colorado.

HERO ID:	6558535

Conditions of Use: Commercial use - spray painting

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Worker activity description:
Number of workers:

Personal protective equipment:

Engineering control:
Comments:

sanding, grinding, welding, spray painting.

13

Half face piece air purifying respirators are used to reduce worker exposure to paint overspray in spray painting booths. NIOSH study recommends use of
supplied-air respirators operated in a positive pressure mode. Eye and skin protection to be worn - rubber gloves should be worn, presently in the study they wear
uniforms.

Spray painting booths have air entering the booth through filters in the door or through a supply air plenum. Air flows parallel to the ground, around the car and
toward exit filters located in the back of the car. Car remains in booth until dry. Two booths operate at a flow rate of 9500 cfm, one booth had flow rate of 3000
cfm and increased to 7000 cfm when adjusted. At the time 12,000 cfm is specified by OSHA standard for spray painting.

Sampling data but none for DCHP or any phthalates.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High	The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods that

are from frequently used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:

Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High	The data are from the United States and are representative of the industry being evalu-

ated.

Medium The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation, but
data is general and not specific to DCHP.

Low	The report is more than 20 years old.

N/A	No sample data.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Assessment or report clearly documents results, methods, and assumptions. Data
sources are generally described but not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

N/A

General PPE and engineering control information for spray painting. No scope to ad-
dress variability and uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination

Medium





Page 49 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Occupational Exposure

HERO ID: 6558536 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Heitbrink, W., Cooper, T., Edmonds, M., Bryant, C., Ruch, W. (1993). In-depth survey report: control technology for autobody repair and painting shops

at Valley Paint and Body Shop, Amelia, Ohio.

HERO ID:	6558536

Conditions of Use: Commercial use - Paint and Coatings

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Exposure route:	inhalation

Physical form:	vapor/mist

Personal protective equipment:	Half-facepiece, air-purifying respirators are used to control worker exposure to airborne particles during some sanding and welding operations. During abrasive

blasting operations with crystalline-silica containing sand, a positive pressure air-supplied, half-facepiece respirator is used. Butyl Rubber gloves during painting.
Engineering control:	Air flow measurements on Spray Painting Booths - airflow into entry duct: 8200 cfm; airflow from top of booth: 13000 cfm; airflow from bottom of booth: 11400

cfm; airflow at exhaust stack: 11600 cfm; leakage into exhaust air plenum: 1300 cfm; recirculation around damper: 750 cfm.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The document is a survey conducted by NIOSH.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:

Geographic Scope

High

The data are from the United States and are representative of the industry being evalu-
ated.

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation but data
is general and not specific to DCHP.

The report is more than 20 years old.

No sample data.

Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium

Low
N/A

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Assessment or report clearly documents results, methods, and assumptions. Data
sources are generally described but not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

N/A

No scope to address variability and uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 50 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Occupational Exposure

HERO ID: 4728432 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:

HERO ID:
Conditions of Use:

Lu, X., Xu, X., Lin, Y„ Zhang, Y„ Huo, X. (2018).

25(21 ):20550-20561.

4728432

Consumer use of plastic products

Phthalate exposure as a risk factor for hypertension. Environmental Science and Pollution Research

Parameter



Data

EXTRACTION



Exposure route:



Populations are exposed to environmental phthalates from routes of ingestion, inhalation, derma, and intravenous contact throughout life, including intrauterine
development.

Domain



Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods
that are from frequently used sources (e.g., European Union or OECD reports, NIOSH
HHEs, journal articles, Kirk-Othmer) and are generally accepted by the scientific com-
munity, and associated information does not indicate flaws or quality issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:

Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Low

Low

High
N/A

The data are from a non-OECD country, and locality-specific factors (e.g., potentially
greater differences in regulatory occupational exposure or emission limits, industry/pro-
cess technologies) may impact exposures or releases relative to the U.S., or the country
of origin is not specified.

The report is for a non-occupational scenario that is similar to an occupational scenario
within the scope of the risk evaluation (consumer use of plastic products similar to in-
dustrial/commercial use of plastic products).

The report captures operations, equipment, and worker activities expected to be repre-
sentative of current conditions. The report is generally no more than 10 years old.
Information is qualitative.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

Assessment or report clearly documents its data sources, assessment methods, results,
and assumptions.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

N/A

No scope to address variability and uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination

Medium





Page 51 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Occupational Exposure

HERO ID: 3222353 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:

HERO ID:
Conditions of Use:

Ng, M. G., Tongeren, van, M., Semple, S. (2014). Simulated transfer of liquids and powders from hands and clothing to the mouth. Journal of Occupational

and Environmental Hygiene ll(10):633-644.

3222353

Applies to more than 1 COUs

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Exposure route:
Physical form:

Dermal exposure data:

dermal to oral route (hand to mouth)

liquid, solid

Dermal exposure data



Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods that
are from frequently used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium The data are from an OECD country other than the U.S.

Medium The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation, but
information is not chemical specific.

High The report is generally no more than 10 years old.

Medium Mean, standard deviation, and p-value provided but individual data points not provided.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

Assessment or report clearly documents its data sources, assessment methods, results,
and assumptions.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

High

The report addresses variability and uncertainty in the results. Uncertainty is well char-
acterized.

Overall Quality Determination

High





Page 52 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Occupational Exposure

HERO ID: 5155535 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	NICNAS, (2016). C4-6 side chain transitional phthalates: Human health tier II assessment.

HERO ID:	5155535

Conditions of Use: Processing

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Worker activity description:

Exposure route:

Physical form:

Comments:

Transfer and blending activities, quality control analysis, and cleaning and maintenance of equipment. Worker exposure to the chemicals at lower concentrations
may also occur while using formulated products containing the chemicals,
dermal, inhalation
vapor, solid

Tagged for multiple chemicals. Does not contain any worker activity description data specific for DCHP.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

Medium

The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods that
are not from a frequently used source and associated information does not indicate flaws
or quality issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
Medium

High
N/A

Data is from Australia (OECD country)

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation but data

is general and not specific to DCHP.

The report is generally no more than 10 years old.

No sample data.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Assessment or report provides results, but the underlying methods, data sources, and
assumptions are not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

N/A

No scope to address variability and uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 53 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Occupational Exposure

HERO ID: 11147625 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:
HERO ID:
Conditions of Use:

OECD, (2004). Test No. 428: Skin absorption: In vitro method.

11147625

All COUs



Parameter



Data

EXTRACTION



Dermal exposure data:



Dermal exposure data





Domain



Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The guideline uses high quality data that are from frequently used sources and are gener-
ally accepted by the scientific community, and associated information does not indicate
flaws or quality issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:

Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
Medium

Low

The guideline was developed by the OECD with involvement from the United States.
The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
The guideline was created over 10 years ago, but less than 20 years ago, and it is still
relevant to occupational exposure conditions today.

There are no sample statistics to support the value of 10 uL/cm2 or 1-5 mg/cm2 for
finite dose dermal loading.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Guideline clearly documents assumptions. Data sources are generally described but not
fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

The guideline provides only limited discussion of the variability and uncertainty of finite
dose dermal loading.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 54 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Occupational Exposure

HERO ID: 1598544 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Pak, V. M., Mccauley, L. A. (2007). Risks of phthalate exposure among the general population: Implications for occupational health nurses. American

Association of Occupational Health Nurses Journal 55(1):12-17.

HERO ID:	1598544

Conditions of Use: Commercial use

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Worker activity description:	Workers in beauty salon, occupational health nurses.

Exposure route:	Phthalates can be ingested, inhaled, or absorbed through the skin.

Number of workers:	407000 people employed in beauty salons around the country

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

Medium

Report uses high quality data that are not from frequently-used sources and there are no
known quality issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Low

Medium
N/A

Data are from the U.S.

The report is for a non-occupational scenario that is similar to an occupational scenario
within the scope of the risk evaluation (commercial use of inks, toner, colorant products
similar to products in beauty salons).

Report is based on data greater than 10 years old but no more than 20 years old and
industry conditions that are expected to be representative of current industry conditions.
No sample data.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

N/A

Factual data, no scope to address variability and uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 55 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Occupational Exposure

HERO ID: 10472417 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:

HERO ID:
Conditions of Use:

RFCI, (2020). Comments of the Resilient Floor Covering Institute (RFCI) on the Safer Products for Washington Priority Consumer Products draft report

to Legislature.

10472417

Vinyl flooring installation

Parameter

EXTRACTION

Data

Exposure route:
Exposure duration:

Inhalation, Dermal, Ingestion

Lifespan of vinyl flooring is provided as 30-50 years but exposure duration is not specified.

Domain

EVALUATION

Metric Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1: Methodology High Frequently used sources were used to identify routes of exposure.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2: Geographic Scope	High The data are from the United States and are representative of the industry being evalu-

ated.

Metric 3: Applicability	Medium The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation but

information is not chemical specific.

Metric 4: Temporal Representativeness	High The report is generally no more than 10 years old.

Metric 5: Sample Size	N/A Sample size not applicable to qualitative data relating to exposure route.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

Assessment or report clearly documents its data sources, assessment methods, results,
and assumptions.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

N/A

Variability and uncertainty not applicable to qualitative data relating to exposure route.

Overall Quality Determination

High





Page 56 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyclohexyl Phthalate	Occupational Exposure	hero id: i 1138808 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:
HERO ID:
Conditions of Use:

U.S. BLS, (2023). U.S. Census Bureau of Labor Statistics Data from 2021.

11138808

All

Parameter



Data

EXTRACTION

Number of workers:



Used to develop a method to estimate number of sites and workers.

Domain



Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

BLS is expected to use reliable survey methods.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
High

U.S. based economic data.

These economic data cover all industry and occupation types in scope for all chemicals.
The BLS OES data are from 2021.

The BLS OES program provides detailed statistics and estimated relative
standard error for each state, industry, and occupation survey conducted
(https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_research_estimates.htm).

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

BLS documents results and methods, but underlying survey results not accessible.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Limited discussion of variability and uncertainty in results.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 57 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Occupational Exposure

HERO ID: 10293388 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	U.S. EPA, (2002). Flexographic ink options: A cleaner technologies substitutes assessment. Volume 1.

HERO ID:	10293388

Conditions of Use: Industrial and commercial use in ink, toner and colorant products

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Worker activity description:

Exposure route:

Area sampling data:

Dermal exposure data:
Exposure duration:

Exposure frequency:

Number of workers:

Personal protective equipment:
Engineering control:
Comments:

Transferring and mixing inks from 55-gallon drums to 5-gallon cans in the ink preparation room and handling ink cans and press operation in the press room

during a print run.

inhalation and dermal exposure

source presents an excerpt from modeled inhalation exposure on pdf page 154. HERO source does not include Appendix 3-F where full data is included.

Dermal exposure data

Transferring and mixing inks : 48 minutes per formulation per shiftOperating press: 7.5 hour shiftAdjusting inks in the 5-gallon cans in press room: 1-2.5 hours
250 days/year

9 workers exposed per shift (1 worker transferring and mixing inks, 8 workers during printing process), 3 shifts per day. 27 total workers exposed per day
eye, face and hand protection as well as goggles, aprons, or other impervious clothing and gloves. In loud facilities, hearing protection may also be recommended,
equipment guards

The inhalation exposure data was modeled data, not monitoring data. Therefore, it was not evaluated as monitoring data.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods that
are from frequently used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:

Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High The data are from the United States and are representative of the industry being evalu-
ated.

Medium Data are for use in ink during printing, an in-scope occupational scenario. However, data

is general and not specific to this chemical.

Medium The report is generally more than 10 years but no more than 20 years old.

Medium Distribution of samples is characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

Assessment or report clearly documents its data sources, assessment methods, results,
and assumptions.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

High

Variability is addressed by including different tasks. Uncertainty is also addressed in the
source.

Overall Quality Determination

High





Page 58 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyclohexyl Phthalate	Occupational Exposure	hero id: 11224653 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	U.S. EPA, (2013). Updating CEB's method for screening-level estimates of dermal exposure.

HERO ID:	11224653

Conditions of Use: All

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Dermal exposure data:

Dermal exposure data





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1: Methodology	High Document published by EPA CEB.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness

Metric 5: Sample Size

High Data are from the U.S.

High Data are applicable to all COUs involving dermal contact.

Medium Report is based on data greater than 10 years old but no more than 20 years old and

industry conditions that are expected to be representative of current industry conditions.
Medium Discrete distribution of samples available from referenced studies, but individual sample
data is not provided in guideline memo.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6: Metadata Completeness	High All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty



Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

Medium Variability addressed by describing dermal exposure parameters for different exposure



scenarios but uncertainty is not addressed.

Overall Quality Determination

High



Page 59 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Occupational Exposure

HERO ID: 4532330 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:
HERO ID:
Conditions of Use:

U.S. EPA, (1991). Chemical engineering branch manual for the preparation of engineering assessments.

4532330

All COUs

Parameter



Data

EXTRACTION

Dermal exposure data:



Dermal exposure data





Domain



Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The CEB manual uses high quality data that are from frequently used sources and are
generally accepted by the scientific community, and associated information does not
indicate flaws or quality issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:

Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High

High
Low
N/A

The data are from the United States and are representative of the industry being evalu-
ated.

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.

The report is more than 20 years old.

No data samples for potential dermal exposure time.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

The CEB Manual clearly documents its data sources, assessment methods, results, and
assumptions.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty regarding the number of contacts is explained, but there are no explanations
of variability among dermal exposure times.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 60 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Occupational Exposure

HERO ID: 4565597 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:

U.S. EPA, (2012). Phthalates action plan.



HERO ID:

4565597



Conditions of Use:

General industrial manufacturing, processing, or use







EXTRACTION

Parameter

Data



Exposure route:	Available information indicates that workers may be exposed to phthalates by inhalation and dermal routes, with the dermal route seeming to be more prevalent.

Number of workers:	According to the IUR data, industrial workers exposed to these phthalates number in the thousands.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods
that are from frequently used sources (e.g., European Union or OECD reports, NIOSH
HHEs, journal articles, Kirk-Othmer) and are generally accepted by the scientific com-
munity, and associated information does not indicate flaws or quality issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:

Geographic Scope

High

The data are from the United States and are representative of the industry being evalu-
ated.

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation but data
is general and not specific to DCHP.

The report captures operations, equipment, and worker activities expected to be repre-
sentative of current conditions. The report is generally no more than 10 years old.
No sample data.

Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
High
N/A

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

Assessment or report clearly documents its data sources, assessment methods, results,
and assumptions.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

N/A

No scope to address variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination

High





Page 61 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Occupational Exposure

HERO ID: 7315971 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	U.S. EPA, (1995). AP-42: Chapter 11.1 - Hot mix asphalt plants.

HERO ID:	7315971

Conditions of Use: Formulation of asphalt

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Particle size characterization:

Emissions from HMA plants may be divided into ducted production emissions, pre-production fugitive dust emissions, and other production-related fugitive
emissions. Pre-production fugitive dust sources associated with HMA plants include vehicular traffic generating fugitive dust on paved and unpaved roads,
aggregate material handling, and other aggregate processing operations. Fugitive dust may range from 0.1 um to more than 300 um in aerodynamic diameter. On
average, 5 percent of cold aggregate feed is less than 74 um (minus 200 mesh). Fugitive dust that may escape collection before primary control generally consists
of PM with 50 to 70 percent of the total mass less than 74 um.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods that
are from frequently used source.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:

Geographic Scope

High

The data are from the United States and are representative of the industry being evalu-
ated.

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation but data

is not specific to DCHP.

The report is more than 20 years old.

No sample data.

Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium

Low
N/A

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Assessment or report clearly documents results, methods, and assumptions. Data
sources are generally described but not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

N/A

No scope to address variability and uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 62 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Occupational Exposure

HERO ID: 786546 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	U.S. EPA, (2011). Exposure factors handbook: 2011 edition.

HERO ID:	786546

Conditions of Use: All COUs

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Dermal exposure data:

Dermal exposure data





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The Exposure Factors Handbook uses high quality data and/or thatare from frequently
used sources and are generally accepted by the scientific community, and associated
information does not indicate flaws or quality issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:

Metric 3:
Metric 4:

Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High

High
Medium

High

The data are from the United States and are representative of the industry being evalu-
ated.

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
The report captures data that are expected to be reasonably representative of current
conditions. The Exposure Factors Handbook is generally more than 10 years but no
more than 20 years old.

Statistical distribution of samples is fully characterized. Sample size is sufficiently rep-
resentative.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

The Exposure Factors Handbook clearly documents its data sources, assessment meth-
ods, results, and assumptions.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

High

The report addresses variability and uncertainty in the results. Uncertainty is well char-
acterized.

Overall Quality Determination

High





Page 63 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Occupational Exposure

HERO ID: 9102546 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	U.S. EPA, (2002). An evaluation of flexographic inks on wide-web film: Summary booklet.

HERO ID:	9102546

Conditions of Use: Inks, toner and colorant products

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Exposure route:

Exposure duration:

Exposure frequency:

Number of workers:

Personal protective equipment:

Engineering control:

Dermal and Inhalation

Pressroom and prep-room workers would work a 7.5 hour shift.

Pressroom and prep-room workers would work 250 days/year.

30,000 people; More than 80% of all flexo firms have fewer than 50 employees, pg. 9

Ensure that all workers who handle inks wear appropriate personal protective gear (e.g., butyl or nitrile gloves and respirators as needed) to minimize exposure to
chemicals.

Maximize good ventilation, particularly in ink prep-rooms and pressrooms.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods that
are from frequently used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:

Geographic Scope

High

The data are from the United States and are representative of the industry being evalu-
ated.

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation but
information is not chemical specific.

The report is more than 20 years old.

No sample data.

Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium

Low
N/A

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Assessment or report clearly documents results, methods, and assumptions. Data
sources are generally described but not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Variability and Uncertainty is not addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 64 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Occupational Exposure

HERO ID: 5547263 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:
HERO ID:
Conditions of Use:

Wang, Y., Zhu, H., Kannan, K. (2019). A review of biomonitoring of phthalate exposures. Toxics 7(2):21.
5547263

Use of Plastic Products



Parameter



EXTRACTION

Data



Exposure route:
Dermal exposure data:



Human exposure to phthalates arises mainly from ingestion, inhalation, and dermal absorption.
Dermal exposure data



Domain



EVALUATION

Metric Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1: Methodology	High	The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods

that are from frequently used sources (e.g., European Union or OECD reports, NIOSH
HHEs, journal articles, Kirk-Othmer) and are generally accepted by the scientific com-
munity, and associated information does not indicate flaws or quality issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:

Metric 3:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Metric 4: Temporal Representativeness
Metric 5: Sample Size

High	The data are from the United States and are representative of the industry being evalu-

ated.

Low	The report is for a non-occupational scenario that is similar to an occupational scenario

within the scope of the risk evaluation, such as a consumer DIY scenario that is similar
to a worker scenario.

High	The report captures operations, equipment, and worker activities expected to be repre-

sentative of current conditions. The report is generally no more than 10 years old.

Low	Distribution of samples is qualitative or characterized by no statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6: Metadata Completeness

High	Assessment or report clearly documents its data sources, assessment methods, results,

and assumptions.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

Low	The report does not address variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination

Medium

Page 65 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 11182955 Table: 1 of 2

Study Citation:	AkzoNobel, (2018). Priority substance program: Environmental risk assessment for dicyclohexyl phthalate, Akzo Nobel Functional Chemicals, Tianjin

production and formulation.

HERO ID:	11182955

Conditions of Use: Processing into formulation

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Release or emission factors:
Release frequency:

Release or emission factors
300 days/year





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

Low

The release data is predicted not actual.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Low
High
Low
Low

The data are from a non-OECD country.

The release data are for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Report is less than 10 years old but methods are from 2003.

Distribution of samples is qualitative or characterized by no statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Release data include release media but no other metadata.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

The release data study does not address variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	Low

Page 66 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyclohexyl Phthalate	Environmental Releases	HERO ID: 11182955 Table: 2 of 2

Study Citation:	AkzoNobel, (2018). Priority substance program: Environmental risk assessment for dicyclohexyl phthalate, Akzo Nobel Functional Chemicals, Tianjin

production and formulation.

HERO ID:	11182955

Conditions of Use: Manufacturing

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Release or emission factors:
Release frequency:

Release or emission factors
300 days/year





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

Low

The release data is not actual but predicted.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Low
High
Low
Low

The data are from a non-OECD country.

The release data are for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Report is less than 10 years old but methods used are from 2003.

Distribution of samples is qualitative or characterized by no statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Release data include release media but no other metadata.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

The release data study does not address variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	Low

Page 67 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 7330238 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:

ECCC/HC, (2020). Science assessment of plastic pollution.

HERO ID:

7330238

Conditions of Use:

Disposal



EXTRACTION

Parameter

Data

Description of release source:	Road traffic-related releases of particles from tire wear and tear are a source of microplastics to outdoor air. Additional sources of microplastics in outdoor air

are thought to include airplane tires, artificial turf, thermoplastic road markings, waste incineration, construction, landfills, industrial emissions, and tumble dryer
exhaust. Deposition and dispersion of all airborne plastic particles from the air may result in accumulations of microplastics in water. The primary source of
microplastic particles in indoor air is thought to be the shedding of polymeric textile fibers from clothing, furniture, carpeting, and household goods due to wear
and tear or abrasion.

Release quantity:	Of the 4,667 kt of plastics that entered the Canadian market in 2016, an estimated 3,268 kt were discarded as waste. Of that plastic waste, an estimated 29 kt (or

1%) were discarded outside of the normal waste stream (i.e., not landfilled, recycled or incinerated) in 2016, through direct release to the environment or through
dumps or leaks. An estimated 9% of the remaining plastic waste was recycled, 86% was landfilled, and 4% was incinerated for energy recovery. In a global
context, it is estimated that only 30% (2,500,000 kt) of all plastics ever produced are still in use. This means that 6,300,000 kt of global cumulative plastic waste
was created between 1950 and 2015. If plastic manufacturing continues at its current pace, the accumulation of plastics will continue to accelerate. It is estimated
that by 2050, 12,000,000 kt of plastic waste will have been discarded globally to landfills or the environment.

Waste treatment methods and pollution control: Waste treatment methods and pollution control

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

Low

The release data methodology is not specified.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
Medium

High
Low

The data are from an OECD country other than the U.S

The release data are for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation

but data is general and not specific to DCHP.

The data are generally no more than 10 years old.

Distribution of samples is qualitative or characterized by no statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Release data include release media but no other metadata.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

The release data study does not address variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	Low

Page 68 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 7349020 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	ERG, (1998). Air emissions inventories, volume 2: Point sources: Chapter 11: Preferred and alternative methods for estimating air emissions from plastic

products manufacturing.

HERO ID:	7349020

Conditions of Use: Plastics Product Manufacturing

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Description of release source:	The primary sources of emissions at plastic products manufacturing facilities are the pieces of equipment (e.g., extruder hopper, die head, sander) used to handle

raw materials and produce the final product. These are typically the locations where chemical reactions occur, liquid solvents and solvent blends are exposed to
the atmosphere, solid resin is heated and melted, and additives are introduced. In addition to emissions generated directly from primary production processes
associated with plastic products manufacturing, there may be additional emissions produced by secondary processes at these facilities. Emission sources from these
secondary processes include storage tanks, equipment leaks, wastewater treatment, combustion sources, and cleaning and surface coating operations. Emissions
from plastic products manufacturing may be generally classified as follows: Volatile organic compound (VOC) and hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions
resulting from the volatilization of free monomer or solvent in the primary polymer blend during processing; & VOC and HAP emissions that result from
secondary process materials, such as blowing agents, additives, and lubricants (mold release compounds); & VOC, HAP, and particulate matter (PM) emissions
that result from byproducts formed by chemical reactions or formed during heating of resins; and & PM emissions generated during raw material handling and
finishing operations. (Section 2.2). Additional description of specific pollutants (e.g., solvents, particulates) provided.

Release or emission factors:	Release or emission factors

Waste treatment methods and pollution control: Waste treatment methods and pollution control

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The release data methodology is known or expected to be accurate and is known to
cover all release sources at the site.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:

Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High

Medium

Low
Medium

The data are from the United States and are representative of the industry being evalu-
ated.

The release data are for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation;
however, the data are general and not chemical specific.

The report is from 1998, which is more than 20 years old.

The emission factor is provided as a single data point with unclear statistical representa-
tiveness.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Release data include most critical metadata, including release media and release fre-
quency, but lacks additional metadata, such as process, unit operation, and/or activity
that is the source of the release.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

High

The release data study addresses variability in the determinants of release. The release
data study addresses uncertainty in the release results.

Continued on next page ...

Page 69 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyclohexyl Phthalate	Environmental Releases	HERO ID: 7349020 Table: 1 of 1

... continued from previous page

Study Citation:

HERO ID:
Conditions of Use:

ERG, (1998). Air emissions inventories, volume 2: Point sources: Chapter 11: Preferred and alternative methods for estimating air emissions from plastic

products manufacturing.

7349020

Plastics Product Manufacturing

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Overall Quality Determination

Medium



Page 70 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyclohexyl Phthalate	Environmental Releases	HERO ID: 3867109 Table: lofl

Study Citation:	Markiewicz, A., Bjorklund, K., Eriksson, E., Kalmykova, Y., Stromvall, A. M., Siopi, A. (2017). Emissions of organic pollutants from traffic and roads:

Priority pollutants selection and substance flow analysis. Science of the Total Environment 580:1162-1174.

HERO ID:	3867109

Conditions of Use: Emission from vehicle and traffic-related activities

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Description of release source:
Release quantity:

Tires, brake linings, integrated vehicle components, car care products, fuels, oils, and lubricants, asphalt, and road paint
Approximately 4.1 kg of four selected phthalates were emitted annually in the Garda catchment area.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Methodology is known and expected to be accurate and cover all release sources at the
site.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
Low

High
Medium

Report is from Sweden, an OECD country.

Data are for consumer use of automotive care products, paints and coatings, and plastic
and rubber products, which can be compared to the commercial uses of these applica-
tions, which are in-scope
Data are no more than 10 years old.

Sample distribution characterized by limited statistics (means) but discrete samples not
provided and distribution not fully characterized.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

Most critical metadata included.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty is addressed for the release estimation process. Variability is not addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 71 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 1335811 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Marx, J. L. (1972). Phthalic acid esters: Biological impact uncertain. Science 46(4056):46-47.

HERO ID:	1335811

Conditions of Use: Disposal

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Description of release source:

Release or emission factors:

Waste treatment methods and pollution control:

Pesticides that contain phthalate carriers may release them directly into air, soil, and water; volatilization and leaching of plasticizers from PVC is another source

of undetermined magnitude. In addition, some bacteria, fungi, and plants have the ability to synthesize phthalates.

Release or emission factors

Waste treatment methods and pollution control

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

Medium

The release data methodology is known or expected to be accurate but may not cover all
release sources at the site.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:

Geographic Scope

High

The data are from the United States and are representative of the industry being evalu-
ated.

The release data are for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation
but data is general to phthalates, not specific to DCHP.

Report is more than 20 years old.

Distribution of samples is characterized by a range with uncertain statistics. It is unclear
if analysis is representative.

Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium

Low
Medium

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Release data include release media but no other metadata.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability is addressed by discussing differences between studies. Uncertainty isn't
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 72 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 6826007 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:

Mersiowsky, N. (2002). Long-term fate of PVC products and their additives in landfills. Progress in Polymer Science 27(10):2227-2277.

HERO ID:

6826007

Conditions of Use:

Disposal



EXTRACTION

Parameter

Data

Description of release source:	Phthalates leach from consumer PVC products in landfills

Release quantity:	In Western Europe, 1,874,000 tons/year of PVC waste are disposed of. 29 ktons/year of phthalates are disposed of from cables, and 116 kton/year of phthalates

are disposed of from floorings.

Waste treatment methods and pollution control: Waste treatment methods and pollution control

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Methodology is known and expected to be accurate and cover all release sources at the
site.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
Low

Low
Low

Data are from Germany, an OECD country.

Data are for the disposal of phthalate wastes, an in-scope occupational scenario, but data
is not specific to DCHP and applies to Europe only.

Report is more than 20 years old.

Distribution of samples is qualitative or characterized by no statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Release data include release media but no other metadata.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty is addressed in the life cycle assessment methods. Variability is not ad-
dressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Low

Page 73 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 11360398 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Milbrandt, A., Coney, K., Badgett, A., Beckham, G. T. (2022). Quantification and evaluation of plastic waste in the United States. Resources, Conservation

and Recycling 183:106363.

HERO ID:	11360398

Conditions of Use: Disposal

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Release quantity:	PDF PG. 4 "We estimate approximately 44 million tons (Mt) of plastic waste was managed through landfilling, combustion, and recycling in 2019."

Waste treatment methods and pollution control: Waste treatment methods and pollution control

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

Medium

Methodology is known and expected to be accurate but may not cover all release sources
at the site.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

High
High

Data are from the U.S.

Data are for disposal, an in-scope occupational scenario; however, the data are not

chemical specific.

Data are no more than 10 years old.

Statistical distribution of samples is fully characterized (discrete sampling data pro-
vided).

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Release media provided but no other metadata.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by discussing multiple plastic waste types, but uncertainty is not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 74 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyclohexyl Phthalate	Environmental Releases	HERO ID: 5466433 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Nunez, C., McMinn, B., Vitas, J. (1996). Barriers to the use of radiation-curable adhesives in the coated and laminated substrate manufacturing industry.

Journal of Hazardous Materials 45(l):59-78.

HERO ID:	5466433

Conditions of Use: Processing - Adhesive Manufacturing

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Description of release source:

Release quantity:

Waste treatment methods and pollution control:

Release source of emissions is from the plant itself. For facilities operating under SIC 2671 and 2672, total emissions are mostly calculated based on raw materials
consumption. Total emissions reflect solvent losses occurring during raw material mixing, coating processing, equipment cleaning, and material storage.

In 1990, total air releases are 10.5 million pounds (does not state what chemicals specifically are in these releases)
nan

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

Low

The release data methodology is not specified.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:

Geographic Scope

High

The data are from the United States and are representative of the industry being evalu-
ated.

Data is directly applicable to a condition of use however the source neglects to mention
any information regarding DCHP or any phthalates.

Information from more than 10 years back.

Distribution of samples is qualitative or characterized by no statistics.

Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium

Low
Low

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Release data include release media but no other metadata.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Information addresses variability by stating different processes that release emissions
but uncertainty is not addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Low

Page 75 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 7348917 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	OECD, (2011). Resource compendium of PRTR release estimation techniques, part 4: Summary of techniques for releases from products, version 1.0.

HERO ID:	7348917

Conditions of Use: Commercial & Consumer Use

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Description of release source:
Release or emission factors:

Building and construction products, Electrical and electronic products, Furniture, Nanoproducts, Packages and plastic bags, personal care and cleaning products,
Textile and leather products, Toys and low-cost jewelry (page 17/109). Releases typically occur during the first use of a product, when carrying out maintenance
of the product, and due to wearing, exposure to heat or light or other ageing of the product (page 63/109).

Release or emission factors

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

Medium

OECD paper provides general methods and equations used to calculate emissions, but
details aren't provided.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:

Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
Medium

Low

Low

Data are provided by the OECD.

Data are for various consumer and commercial uses which are in scope of the risk evalu-
ation but not chemical-specific (data is for DEHP).

Paper was published in 2011, but most emission factor data is from 2002, which is
greater than 20 years old.

Emission factor data is characterized by no statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Release data include release source and emission factors. Formulas for release quantity
are provided. Data lacks release frequency and waste treatment methods.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

The release data study does not address variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	Low

Page 76 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 6580284 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:
HERO ID:
Conditions of Use:

programs, E.O. (1974). Air pollution control engineering and cost study of the paint and varnish industry.
6580284

Processing: Formulation of paint and varnish

Parameter

EXTRACTION

Data

Description of release source:

Release quantity:

Release or emission factors:

Waste treatment methods and pollution control:

Air pollutant emissions are primarily the fugitive type and consist of evaporation losses of the volatile portion of the vehicle from the milling operation and from
various product holding tanks and packing stations. There are also some fugitive particulate emissions that result from handling and emptying of pigment or
extender bags into the grinding and dispersion mills. In some plants these loading areas are hooded and bags and pigment dusts are passed to a central collection
station. At this station bags are removed for refuse disposal and the pigment dust is collected in a fabric filter and recycled into primer or other dark paint mixes.
II Waste materials constitute a major source of potential liquid pollutants. These include spoiled batches, residues and solvent and aqueous solutions for washing
equipment. II Most solid waste, with the exception of that which can be considered part of an air pollution emission, is incorporated into the liquid wastes described
in the previous section. These include pigment particulate and latex emulsion as well as the non-volatile portion of the film former which would be left if the paint
or resin were allowed to dry.

Source contains information on hydrocarbon, organics, and particulate emissions, and waste solvent, resin, and paint, but nothing specific to DCHP.

Release or emission factors

Waste treatment methods and pollution control

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The release data methodology is known or expected to be accurate and is known to
cover all release sources at the site.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:

Geographic Scope

High

The data are from the United States and are representative of the industry being evalu-
ated.

The release data are for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation
but information is not specific to DCHP.

The data were collected before the most recent federal regulatory action or update or
are more than 20 years old if no federal regulation is established. The operations, equip-
ment, and worker activities are not available or indicate that the associated data are
expected to be outdated.

Distribution of samples is characterized by a range with uncertain statistics. It is unclear
if analysis is representative.

Metric 3:
Metric 4:

Metric 5:

Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
Low

Medium

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Release data include most critical metadata such as process and release media.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by including different processes but uncertainty is not addressed.

Continued on next page ...

Page 77 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyclohexyl Phthalate	Environmental Releases	HERO ID: 6580284 Table: 1 of 1

... continued from previous page

Study Citation:

programs, E.O. (1974). Air pollution control engineering and cost study of the paint and varnish industry.



HERO ID:

6580284



Conditions of Use:

Processing: Formulation of paint and varnish





EVALUATION



Domain

Metric Rating

Comments

Overall Quality Determination Medium



Page 78 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 1335691 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Radian Corp, (1989). Environmental analysis for the Shell Martinez RM-17 incinerator, with cover letter dated 3/15/1991 (sanitized).

HERO ID:	1335691

Conditions of Use: Disposal - Waste incineration

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Description of release source:

Release quantity:

Waste treatment methods and pollution control:

RM-17 incinerator to a 100-foot stack

For phthalates in general, emissions were 1.4 x 10A-4 g/s

Waste treatment methods and pollution control



Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Report uses high quality data, techniques and methods that are from the EPA and do not
indicate flaws or quality issues

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Low
Low

Data is from the US

Data contains general phthalate emissions and exposures but does not contain informa-
tion specific to DCHR Data could possibly be used as analogous data
Assessment is more than 20 years old.

Characterized by no statistics

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Provides results but the underlying methods, data sources and assumptions are not fully
transparent

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Does not address variability or uncertainty

Overall Quality Determination	Low

Page 79 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 3859095 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Saeed, T., Al-Jandal, N., Abusam, A., Taqi, H., Al-Khabbaz, A., Zafar, J. (2017). Sources and levels of endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) in

Kuwait's coastal areas. Marine Pollution Bulletin 118(1 -2):407-412.

HERO ID:	3859095

Conditions of Use: Disposal: Sewage treatment plant

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Description of release source:	Products such as cosmetics, perfumes, detergents, aerosol sprays, and plastics

Release or emission factors:	Release or emission factors

Waste treatment methods and pollution control: Waste treatment methods and pollution control

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The release data methodology is known or expected to be accurate and is known to
cover all release sources at the site.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:

Metric 3:
Metric 4:

Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Low

Low
High

Medium

The data are from a non-OECD country, and locality-specific factors may impact (e.g.,
potentially greater differences in regulatory emission limits, industry/process technolo-
gies) releases relative to the U.S., or the country of origin is not specified.

Data is for disposal of consumer products but it may apply to disposal of products used
in commercial/industrial use. Also, data is general and not specific to DCHP.
The operations, equipment, and worker activities associated with the data indicate that
the data should to be representative of current operations, equipment, and activities. The
release data were collected after the most recent federal regulatory action (e.g., NE-
SHAP for air release or effluent limit guideline (ELG) for water release) or update or are
no more than 10 years old, whichever is shorter. If no federal regulation is established,
the data are generally no more than 10 years old.

Distribution of samples is characterized by a range with uncertain statistics. It is unclear
if analysis is representative.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Release data include release media but no other metadata.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability is addressed by comparing treatment plants but uncertainty is not discussed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 80 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 10293388 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:

U.S. EPA, (2002). Flexographic ink options: A cleaner technologies substitutes assessment. Volume 1.

HERO ID:

10293388

Conditions of Use:

Industrial and commercial use in ink, toner and colorant products



EXTRACTION

Parameter

Data

Description of release source:	Source estimates air releases from fugitive releases from ink chamber and the press process as well as stack releases from the oxidizer after the press process (pdf

page 146)

Release quantity:	Calculated air release estimates provided for multiple types of inks (i.e. water-based, solvent-based, and UV-cured) on pdf page 148 and more in appendix 3-D

(not included in the HERO file)

Waste treatment methods and pollution control: Waste treatment methods and pollution control

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

Medium

The release data methodology is known or expected to be accurate but may not cover all
release sources at the site.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:

Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High

Medium

Medium
Medium

The data are from the United States and are representative of the industry being evalu-
ated.

Data are for use in ink during printing, an in-scope occupational scenario. However, data
is general and not specific to this chemical.

Information is between 10 and 20 years old.

Distribution of samples is characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Release data include most critical metadata, including release media and release fre-
quency, but lacks additional metadata, such as process, unit operation, and/or activity
that is the source ofthe release.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

High

Variability is addressed by including different types of inks and uncertainty is addressed
in the source.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 81 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyclohexyl Phthalate	Environmental Releases	HERO ID: 6535959 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	U.S. EPA, (2019). National Emissions Inventory (NEI) [database]: CASRNs 79-00-5, 75-34-3, 107-06-2, 78-87-5, 84-61-7, 106-99-0, 106-93-4, 50-00-0,

85-44-9, 106-46-7, 85-68-7, 84-74-2, and 115-86-6.

HERO ID:	6535959

Conditions of Use: All

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Description of release source:

Release quantity:

Release or emission factors:

Release frequency:

Waste treatment methods and pollution control:

Provides unit/process of release.

Provides quantity released per release event.

Release or emission factors

Provides annual operating time.

nan



Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

Medium

Submitters provide general method used to calculate emissions, but details not provided.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Medium

NEI is U.S. based data.

NEI includes industries included in the scopes of multiple chemicals.

NEI data is less than 10 years old.

Universe is limited to units subject to NESHAP with threshold potential to emit, al-
though states may have different requirements; statistical representativeness is unclear.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

NEI includes release media and generally also includes daily and annual operating time,
specific unit/process that is the source of release, and presence of engineering controls.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

NEI does not address variability or uncertainty in submitter provided data.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 82 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 7310513 Table: 1 of 6

Study Citation:	U.S. EPA, (1995). Chapter 6: Organic chemical process industry. Compilation of air pollutant emission factors. Volume I: Stationary point and area

sources, fifth edition, AP-42.

HERO ID:	7310513

Conditions of Use: Paint and varnish manufacturing

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Description of release source:	See page 29. The primary factors affecting emissions from paint manufacture are care in handling dry pigments, types of solvents used, and mixing temperature.

About 1 or 2 percent of the solvent is lost even under well-controlled conditions. Particulate emissions amount to 0.5 to 1.0 percent of the pigment handled.
Varnish cooking emissions? largely in the form of volatile organic compounds, depend on the cooking temperatures and times, the solvent used, the degree of tank
enclosure and the type of air pollution controls used. Emissions from varnish cooking range from 1 to 6 percent of the raw material.

Release or emission factors:	Release or emission factors

Waste treatment methods and pollution control: Waste treatment methods and pollution control

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

Low

The release data methodology is not specified.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Low
Low

The data are from the United States.

The release data are for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
However, DCHP not specifically mentioned.

Data are greater than 20 years old.

Distribution of samples is qualitative or characterized by no statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Release data include release media but no other metadata.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by multiple sources for emission factors, but uncertainty is not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Low

Page 83 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyclohexyl Phthalate	Environmental Releases	HERO ID: 7310513 Table: 2 of 6

Study Citation:	U.S. EPA, (1995). Chapter 6: Organic chemical process industry. Compilation of air pollutant emission factors. Volume I: Stationary point and area

sources, fifth edition, AP-42.

HERO ID:	7310513

Conditions of Use: plastics manufacturing

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Description of release source:

Release or emission factors:

Waste treatment methods and pollution control:

See page 41-74. The major sources of air contamination in plastics manufacturing are the raw materials or monomers, solvents, or other volatile liquids emitted

during the reaction; sublimed solids such as phthalic anhydride emitted in alkyd production; and solvents lost during storage and handling of thinned resins.

Additional description provided.

Release or emission factors

Waste treatment methods and pollution control

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

Low

The release data methodology is not specified.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Low
Low

The data are from the United States.

The release data are for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
However, DCHP not specifically mentioned.

Data are greater than 20 years old.

Distribution of samples is qualitative or characterized by no statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Release data include release media but no other metadata.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by multiple sources for emission factors, but uncertainty is not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Low

Page 84 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyclohexyl Phthalate	Environmental Releases	HERO ID: 7310513 Table: 3 of 6

Study Citation:	U.S. EPA, (1995). Chapter 6: Organic chemical process industry. Compilation of air pollutant emission factors. Volume I: Stationary point and area

sources, fifth edition, AP-42.

HERO ID:	7310513

Conditions of Use: printing ink manufacturing

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Description of release source:	See page 74. Varnish or vehicle preparation by heating is by far the largest source of ink manufacturing emissions. Cooling the varnish components - resins,

drying oils, petroleum oils, and solvents produces odorous emissions. At about 350°F (175°C) the products begin to decompose, resulting in the emission of
decomposition products from the cooking vessel. Emissions continue throughout the cooking process with the maximum rate of emissions occurring just after the
maximum temperature has been reached. Additional description provided.

Release or emission factors:	Release or emission factors

Waste treatment methods and pollution control: Waste treatment methods and pollution control

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

Low

The release data methodology is not specified.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High

Low
Low

The data are from the United States.

The release data are for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
However, DCHP not specifically mentioned.

Data are greater than 20 years old.

Distribution of samples is qualitative or characterized by no statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Release data include release media but no other metadata.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by multiple sources for emission factors, but uncertainty is not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Low

Page 85 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyclohexyl Phthalate	Environmental Releases	HERO ID: 7310513 Table: 4 of 6

Study Citation:	U.S. EPA, (1995). Chapter 6: Organic chemical process industry. Compilation of air pollutant emission factors. Volume I: Stationary point and area

sources, fifth edition, AP-42.

HERO ID:	7310513

Conditions of Use: soap and detergent manufacturing

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Description of release source:	See page 79-82. The main atmospheric pollution problem in soap manufacturing is odor. The storage and handling of liquid ingredients (including sulfonic acids

and salts) and sulfates are some of the sources of this odor. Vent lines, vacuum exhausts, raw material and product storage, and waste streams are all potential
odor sources. The exhaust air from detergent spray drying towers contains 2 types of air contaminants: (1) fine detergent particles and (2) organics vaporized in
the higher temperature zones of the tower. Additional description provided.

Release or emission factors:	Release or emission factors

Waste treatment methods and pollution control: Waste treatment methods and pollution control

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

Low

The release data methodology is not specified.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Uninformative
Low
Low

The data are from the United States.

The occupational scenario is not within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Data are greater than 20 years old.

Distribution of samples is qualitative or characterized by no statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Release data include release media but no other metadata.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by multiple sources for emission factors, but uncertainty is not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Uninformative

Page 86 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyclohexyl Phthalate	Environmental Releases	HERO ID: 7310513 Table: 5 of 6

Study Citation:	U.S. EPA, (1995). Chapter 6: Organic chemical process industry. Compilation of air pollutant emission factors. Volume I: Stationary point and area

sources, fifth edition, AP-42.

HERO ID:	7310513

Conditions of Use: synthetic fiber manufacturing

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Description of release source:	See page 89-101.Air pollution emission points in the wet spinning organic solvent process are similar to those of dry spinning. Wet spinning processes that use

solutions of acids or salts to dissolve the polymer chips emit no solvent VOC, only unreacted monomer, and are, therefore, relatively clean from an air pollution
standpoint. For those that require solvent, emissions occur as solvent evaporates from the spinning bath and from the fiber in post-spinning operations. Additional
description provided.

Release or emission factors:	Release or emission factors

Waste treatment methods and pollution control: Waste treatment methods and pollution control

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

Low

The release data methodology is not specified.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Low
Low

The data are from the United States.

The release data are for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
However, DCHP not specifically mentioned.

Data are greater than 20 years old.

Distribution of samples is qualitative or characterized by no statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Release data include release media but no other metadata.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by multiple sources for emission factors, but uncertainty is not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Low

Page 87 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyclohexyl Phthalate	Environmental Releases	HERO ID: 7310513 Table: 6 of 6

Study Citation:	U.S. EPA, (1995). Chapter 6: Organic chemical process industry. Compilation of air pollutant emission factors. Volume I: Stationary point and area

sources, fifth edition, AP-42.

HERO ID:	7310513

Conditions of Use: synthetic rubber manufacturing

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Description of release source:	See page 107. Because recovery of the unreacted monomers and their subsequent purification are essential to economical operation, unreacted butadiene and

styrene from the emulsion crumb polymerization process normally are recovered. The latex emulsion is introduced to flash tanks where, using vacuum flashing,
the unreacted butadiene is removed. The but;ldiene is then compressed, condensed, and pumped back to the tank farm storage area for subsequent reuse. The
condenser tail gases and noncondensables pass through a butadiene adsorber/desorber unit, where more butadiene is recovered. Some noncondensables and VOC
vapors pass to the atmosphere or, at some plants, to a flare system. The latex stream from the butadiene recovery area is then sent to the styrene recovery process,
usually taking place in perforated plate steam stripping columns. Additional description provided.

Release or emission factors:	Release or emission factors

Waste treatment methods and pollution control: Waste treatment methods and pollution control

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

Low

The release data methodology is not specified.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Low
Low

The data are from the United States.

The release data are for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
However, DCHP not specifically mentioned.

Data are greater than 20 years old.

Distribution of samples is qualitative or characterized by no statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Release data include release media but no other metadata.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by multiple sources for emission factors, but uncertainty is not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Low

Page 88 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 7315820 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	U.S. EPA, (1995). Chapter 4.2: Introduction to surface coating. Compilation of air pollutant emission factors. Volume I: Stationary point and area sources,

fifth edition, AP-42.

HERO ID:	7315820

Conditions of Use: Use (Paints and Coatings)

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Description of release source:	Though DCHP is not specifically mentioned, the group of articles provide information on various types of coating on metal and non-mental surfaces. As for

example, sources of can coating VOC emissions include the coating area and the oven area of the sheet base and lithographic coating lines, the 3-piece can side
seam and interior spray coating processes, and the 2-piece can coating and end sealing compound lines. Emission rates vary with line speed, can or sheet size, and
coating type. On sheet coating lines, where the coating is applied by rollers, most solvent evaporates in the oven. For other coating processes, the coating operation
itself is the major source.The only pollutants emitted in significant quantities from solvent base coating using plasticizers are volatile organic compounds from
solvent evaporation. In an uncontrolled facility, essentially all of the solvent used in the coating formulation is emitted to the atmosphere. Of these uncontrolled
emissions, 80 to 95 percent are emitted with the drying oven exhaust. Some solvent (from zero to 5 percent) can remain in the final coated product, although this
solvent will eventually evaporate into the atmosphere. The remainder of applied solvent is lost from a number of small sources as fugitive emissions. There are
also VOC losses from solvent storage and handling, equipment cleaning, miscellaneous spills, and coating formulation mixing tanks. Fugitive solvent emissions
during the coating process come from the evaporative loss of solvent around the coating head and from the exposed wet web prior to its entering the drying oven.
Release or emission factors:	Release or emission factors

Waste treatment methods and pollution control: Waste treatment methods and pollution control

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The release data methodology is known or expected to be accurate and is known to
cover all release sources at the site.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Low
Medium

The data are from the United States.

The release data are for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation,
but data is general and not specific to DCHP.

Data is more than 20 years old.

Distribution of samples is characterized by a range with uncertain statistics. It is unclear
if analysis is representative.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Release data includes most critical metadata, including release media and process but
lacks additional metadata, such as chemical specific release information, release fre-
quency and activity.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

The release data study provides only limited discussion of the variability in the determi-
nants of release but no discussion of theuncertainty in the release results.

Continued on next page ...

Page 89 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyclohexyl Phthalate	Environmental Releases	HERO ID: 7315820 Table: 1 of 1

... continued from previous page

Study Citation:

U.S. EPA, (1995). Chapter 4.2: Introduction to surface coating. Compilation of air pollutant emission factors. Volume I: Stationary point and area sources,



fifth edition, AP-42.



HERO ID:

7315820



Conditions of Use:

Use (Paints and Coatings)







EVALUATION

Domain

Metric

Rating Comments

Overall Quality Determination

Medium



Page 90 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 7315841 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:

U.S. EPA, (1995). Ap-42: Chapter 4.12 - Manufacture of rubber products.

HERO ID:

7315841

Conditions of Use:

Processing: Rubber Product Manufacturing



EXTRACTION

Parameter

Data

Description of release source:	The mechanically created or externally added heat present during the six principal processes (mixing, milling, extrusion, calendaring, curing, and grinding) cause

VOC and HAP to be emitted. Particulate matter is primarily emitted from the dry chemicals utilized in mixing and as a result of grinding, (pg 16 of 20)

Release or emission factors:	Release or emission factors

Waste treatment methods and pollution control: nan

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The release data methodology is known or expected to be accurate

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Low
N/A

Data are from the U.S.

The release data are for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation,
however data is general and not specific to DCHP.

Data is greater than 20 years old.

No sample data.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Release data include most critical metadata, including release media and process, but
lacks additional metadata, such as chemical specific emission factors and activity.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

High

Variability is addressed by providing emission factors for different processes, and uncer-
tainty is also discussed in the document.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 91 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 7315971 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	U.S. EPA, (1995). AP-42: Chapter 11.1 - Hot mix asphalt plants.

HERO ID:	7315971

Conditions of Use: Formulation of asphalt

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Description of release source:
Release or emission factors:

Releases from manufacturing of hot mix asphalt paving materials
Release or emission factors



Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The release data methodology is known or expected to be accurate and is known to
cover all release sources at the site.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:

Metric 3:

Metric 4:

Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium
Low

Medium

The data are from the United States and are representative of the industry being evalu-
ated.

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to this chemical.

The data were collected before the most recent federal regulatory action or update or
are more than 20 years old if no federal regulation is established. The operations, equip-
ment, and worker activities are not available or indicate that the associated data are
expected to be outdated.

Distribution of samples is characterized by a range with uncertain statistics. It is unclear
if analysis is representative.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Release data include most critical metadata, including release media and release fre-
quency, but lacks additional metadata, such as process, unit operation, and/or activity
that is the source of the release.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

High

The release data study addresses variability in the determinants of release. The release
data study addresses uncertainty in the release results.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 92 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 59547 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Vandervort, R., Brooks, S. M. (1977). Polyvinyl chloride film thermal decomposition products as an occupational illness: I. Environmental exposures and

toxicology. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 19(3): 188-191.

HERO ID:	59547

Conditions of Use: PVC film and label adhesive in meat packing

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Description of release source:
Release quantity:

Release comes from thermal degradation of PVC film upon being heated. Degradation can happen during hot wire cutting.

Table 1 - Thermal decomposition product of DCHP (sample heated at 200 to 210 C for 30 & 60 sec: Cyclohexanol - 90 ppm, 130 ppm; Cyclohexyl ether - 43
ppm, 92 ppm; Phthalic Anhydride - 10 ppm, 113 ppm; Cyclohexyl Benzoate - 5 ppm, 38 ppm.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Source is peer reviewed so likely contains high quality data.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Medium
Low

Data is for US

Data is applicable to commercial use of PVC film and adhesives. No DCHP specific
data

Data is over 20 years old (1977).

Not characterized by statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

Assessment or report clearly documents its data sources, assessment methods, results,
and assumptions.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Does not address variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 93 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 3688160 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	EC/HC, (2015). State of the science report: Phthalate substance grouping: Medium-chain phthalate esters: Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Numbers:

84-61-7; 84-64-0; 84-69-5; 523-31-9; 5334-09-8;16883-83-3; 27215-22-1; 27987-25-3; 68515-40-2; 71888-89-6.

HERO ID:	3688160

Conditions of Use: Production and life cycle

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Description of release source:	Medium-chain phthalates are expected to be released primarily to water through wastewater effluents from industrial sources and through disperse releases from

consumer products. In products, medium-chain phthalates are not bound within the matrix and are therefore subject to migration and environmental release.
Consumer products disposed to wastewater treatment systems are another potential source of environmental releases (p. 4).

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods
that are from a frequently used source (e.g., European Union or OECD reports, NIOSH
HHEs, journal articles, Kirk-Othmer) and are generally accepted by the scientific com-
munity, and associated information does not indicate flaws or quality issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness

Medium
High
High

The data are from an OECD country other than the U.S. (Canada).

The assessment is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.

The assessment captures operations, equipment, and worker activities expected to be

representative of current conditions. EPA has no reason to believe exposures have

changed. The completed exposure or risk assessment is generally no more than 10 years

old.

Not applicable to qualitative information.

Metric 5:

Sample Size

N/A

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

Assessment or report clearly documents its data sources, assessment methods, results,
and assumptions.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

High

The assessment addresses variability and uncertainty in the results. Uncertainty is well
characterized.

Overall Quality Determination

High





Page 94 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyclohexyl Phthalate	Environmental Releases	HERO ID: 5353181 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	EC/HC, (2017). Draft screening assessment: Phthalate substance grouping.

HERO ID:	5353181

Conditions of Use: Waste handling, treatment and disposal

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Description of release source:

Releases may occur during the manufacture and processing of phthalates, including transportation and storage, as well as during production, use and disposal of
products that contain phthalates (e.g., release of phthalates into wastewater systems from use of cosmetics).(29/228)

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Report uses high quality data from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
Medium

High
N/A

Data are from Canada, an OECD country.

Information is for phthalate waste handling, treatment, and disposal, an in-scope occupa-
tional scenario but is not specific to DEHP.

Assessment is based on current industry conditions and data no more than 10 years old.
No sample data.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

N/A

No scope to address variability and uncertainty since information is just a description of
release.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 95 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 3808976 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	OECD, (2011). Emission scenario document on coating application via spray-painting in the automotive refinishing industry.

HERO ID:	3808976

Conditions of Use: Use - Automotive Coating Application

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Description of release source:

Release or emission factors:

Release frequency:

Waste treatment methods and pollution control:

Container cleaning, equipment cleaning, coating application (overspray). Releases to air and land,
nan

250 days/yr
nan

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Low
Medium

This ESD was developed by EPA based on U.S. data

Data is for multiple in-scope occupational scenarios; however, data is general and not
specific to a chemical.

Assessment is based on data greater than 20 years old.

Sample distribution characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering multiple coating types.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 96 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 3827298 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:

OECD, (2009). Emission scenario documents on coating industry (paints, lacquers and varnishes).

HERO ID:

3827298

Conditions of Use:

Processing and Use: Formulation of Coatings and Use of Coatings



EXTRACTION

Parameter

Data

Description of release source:	PROC: material loading, heat-up, surface evaporation, filling, miscellaneous operations, material storage, leaks, spills USE: Application losses, equipment

residues, drum residues. Releases to water, air, land.

Release or emission factors:	Release or emission factors

Waste treatment methods and pollution control: Waste treatment methods and pollution control

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
Medium

Medium
Medium

This ESD was not developed by EPA, but another OECD-member country.

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific

to a chemical.

Assessment is generally based on data greater than 10 years old but no more than 20
years old and industry conditions that are expected to be representative of current indus-
try conditions.

Sample distribution characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering multiple chemical func-
tions and coating types

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 97 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 3827299 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:
HERO ID:
Conditions of Use:

OECD, (2009). Emission scenario document on adhesive formulation.
3827299

Processing: Adhesives and sealants

EXTRACTION

Parameter

Data

Description of release source:

Release quantity:

Release or emission factors:

Release frequency:

Waste treatment methods and pollution control: nan

Container cleaning, dusts and volatiles from unloading containers, vented losses during mixing, sampling, equipment cleaning, volatiles from loading containers,

off-spec products. Releases to water, air, land.

Provides models for estimating various fugitive air releases

Release or emission factors

days/yr equal to number of bt/yr

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Medium
Medium

This ESD was developed by EPA based on U.S. data

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Assessment is generally based on data greater than 10 years old but no more than 20
years old and industry conditions that are expected to be representative of current indus-
try conditions.

Data characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering various chemical func-
tions and types of adhesives.

Overall Quality Determination

High

Page 98 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 3827300 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	OECD, (2013). Emission scenario document on the industrial use of adhesives for substrate bonding.

HERO ID:	3827300

Conditions of Use: Use of adhesives for substrate bonding

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Description of release source:

Release or emission factors:

Release frequency:

Waste treatment methods and pollution control:

container cleaning, unloading, equipment cleaning, application losses, curing/drying, trimming. Release to water, air, land,
nan

50-365 days/yr

Waste treatment methods and pollution control

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Medium
Medium

This ESD was developed by EPA based on U.S. data

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Assessment is generally based on data greater than 10 years old but no more than 20
years old and industry conditions that are expected to be representative of current indus-
try conditions.

Sample distribution characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering various chemical func-
tions, types of adhesives, and end use markets.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 99 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyclohexyl Phthalate	Environmental Releases	HERO ID: 3840003 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	OECD, (2010). Emission scenario document on formulation of radiation curable coatings, inks and adhesives.

HERO ID:	3840003

Conditions of Use: Processing: Paints and Coatings

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Description of release source:

Release quantity:

Release or emission factors:

Release frequency:

Waste treatment methods and pollution control:

Container cleaning, dusts and volatiles from unloading containers, vented losses during mixing, sampling, equipment cleaning, volatiles from loading containers,

filter wastes. Releases to water, air, land.

Provides models for estimating various releases

Release or emission factors

250

Waste treatment methods and pollution control

EVALUATION

Domain	Metric	Rating	Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:	Methodology	High	Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Low
Medium

This ESD was developed by EPA based on U.S. data

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Assessment is based on data greater than 20 years old.

Sample distribution characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering various chemical func-
tions and types of UV curable products.

Overall Quality Determination

Medium





Page 100 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 5079084 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	OECD, (2009). Emission scenario document on plastic additives.

HERO ID:	5079084

Conditions of Use: Processing - Plastic Additives

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Description of release source:
Release or emission factors:

Raw material handling, compounding, converting, service life, disposal. Release to Air, water,
nan

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
Medium

Low
Medium

This ESD was not developed by EPA, but another OECD-member country.

Data are for multiple in-scope occupational scenarios; however, data is general and not

specific to a chemical.

Assessment from 2011 but is based on data greater than 20 years old.

Data characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by presenting emission factors for multiple scenarios/additive
types but uncertainty is not addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 101 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 6306753 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	OECD, (2011). Emission scenario document on the chemical industry.

HERO ID:	6306753

Conditions of Use: Manufacture, processing, use

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Description of release source:
Release or emission factors:

Stack Air: Reactor vents, distillation column vents, absorber units, strippers, sumps/decanters, dryers, cooling vents Fugitive Air: Valves, pump seals, compressor
seals, pressure-relief valves, flanges/connections, open-ended lines, sampling connections Water: Drum cleaning, equipment cleaning, aqueous distillation streams,
extraction, reaction water, absorption, solids-liquids separation, adsorption, condensation. Releases to air, water,
nan

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
Medium

Low
Medium

This ESD was not developed by EPA, but another OECD-member country.

Data are for multiple in-scope occupational scenarios; however, data is general and not

specific to a chemical.

Assessment from 2011 but is based on data greater than 20 years old.

Data characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by presenting emission factors for multiple scenarios but uncer-
tainty is not addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 102 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 6393282 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	OECD, (2009). Emission scenario document on transport and storage of chemicals.

HERO ID:	6393282

Conditions of Use: Transportation and Storage (Processing, distribution in commerce)

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Description of release source:

Release or emission factors:

Waste treatment methods and pollution control:

filling and emptying of containers, storage, pipelines, washing and cleaning, recycling and disposal of packaging

Release or emission factors

nan

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
Medium

Low
Medium

This ESD was not developed by EPA, but another OECD-member country.

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific

to a chemical.

Assessment is based on data greater than 20 years old.

Sample distribution characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering multiple chemical
forms, containers and storage system types.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 103 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 6311222 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Science Applications International Corporation, (1996). Generic scenario for automobile spray coating: Draft report.

HERO ID:	6311222

Conditions of Use: Automotive Coating Application

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Description of release source:

Release or emission factors:

Release frequency:

Waste treatment methods and pollution control:

Auto OEM: blowdown, sludge processing, generated sludge, stack air releases. Autorefinish: air filter waste from overspray, stack air.
Release or emission factors

Auto OEM: sludge pit cleaning: 1 day/yr. All other releases: 250 days/yr. Autorefinish: 170 days/yr.

Waste treatment methods and pollution control

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Low
Medium

This GS is based on U.S. data

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Assessment is based on data greater than 20 years old.

Sample distribution characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering OEM and refinish ap-
plications.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 104 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyclohexyl Phthalate	Environmental Releases	HERO ID: 10480466 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	U.S. EPA, (2023). Use of laboratory chemicals - Generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental releases (Revised draft generic

scenario).

HERO ID:	10480466

Conditions of Use: Use - Laboratory Chemicals

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Description of release source:

Release or emission factors:

Release frequency:

Waste treatment methods and pollution control:

Container unloading, container cleaning, labware equipment cleaning, during laboratory analyses, waste disposalRelease media: Water, air, landfill
Release or emission factors
260 day/yr

Waste treatment methods and pollution control

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality information/data from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

High
Medium

This GS is based on U.S. data

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Assessment is based on current industry conditions and data no more than 10 years old.
Sample distribution characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Variability and uncertainty are not addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 105 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 11182966 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	U.S. EPA, (2022). Chemical repackaging - Generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental releases (revised draft).

HERO ID:	11182966

Conditions of Use: Repackaging

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Description of release source:

Release quantity:

Release or emission factors:

Release frequency:

Waste treatment methods and pollution control:

Transfer losses, container cleaning, equipment cleaning, transfer losses during loading.

Provides methodology to estimate releases based on various parameters including: opening area of cleaning equipment, physical-chemical properties, air velocity,
etc.

Release or emission factors

The number of operating days is given in a range of 174-260 days/yr with an EPA default of 260 days/yr.

Waste treatment methods and pollution control

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:

Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness

Sample Size

High
Medium

Medium

Medium

This GS is based on U.S. data.

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Assessment is generally based on data greater than 10 years old but no more than 20
years old and industry conditions that are expected to be representative of current indus-
try conditions.

Sample distribution characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:	Metadata Completeness	High All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

Medium Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering emissions from multiple
activities.

Overall Quality Determination

High



Page 106 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 3827195 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:
HERO ID:
Conditions of Use:

U.S. EPA, (2014). Generic scenario draft on the use of additives in plastic compounding.
3827195

Plastics Compounding

EXTRACTION

Parameter

Data

Description of release source:
Release quantity:

Release or emission factors:
Release frequency:

Unloading containers, spillage, Container cleaning, dusts and fugitive emissions from compounding, equipment cleaning
Provides models for estimating various fugitive air releases
Release or emission factors
148-264 days/yr

Waste treatment methods and pollution control: Waste treatment methods and pollution control

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Medium
Medium

This GS is based on U.S. data

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Assessment is generally based on data greater than 10 years old but no more than 20
years old and industry conditions that are expected to be representative of current indus-
try conditions.

Sample distribution characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering multiple plastic and
additive types.

Overall Quality Determination

High

Page 107 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 6304171 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	U.S. EPA, (2004). Use of additives in foamed plastics - generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental releases - Draft.

HERO ID:	6304171

Conditions of Use: Flexible and Rigid Polyurethane Foam Manufacture

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Description of release source:
Release or emission factors:

Container residues, equipment residues, release of auxiliary blowing agents (ABAs), scrap or off-spec product disposal (page 12 of 19)
Release or emission factors

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High

Medium
Medium

This GS is based on U.S. data

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Assessment is generally based on data greater than 10 years old but no more than 20
years old and industry conditions that are expected to be representative of current indus-
try conditions.

Sample distribution characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering multiple foam types.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 108 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 6311218 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:

HERO ID:
Conditions of Use:

Parameter

U.S. EPA, (2004). Additives in plastics processing (compounding) - generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental release -

Draft.

6311218

Processing as a reactant as a process regulator for Plastic material and resin manufacturing; incorporation into formulation, mixture,
or reaction product as a plasticizer for Plastics product manufacturing; incorporation into article as a plasticizer for Plastics product
manufacturing

EXTRACTION

Data

Description of release source:
Release quantity:

Release or emission factors:
Release frequency:

Unloading containers, spillage, Container cleaning, dusts and fugitive emissions from compounding, equipment cleaning
Provides models for estimating various fugitive air releases
Release or emission factors
250 days/yr

Waste treatment methods and pollution control: Waste treatment methods and pollution control

Comments:	QC Note: This is an early draft of the Plastic Compounding GS and may not provide the most up to data info

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Medium
Medium

This GS is based on U.S. data

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Assessment is generally based on data greater than 10 years old but no more than 20
years old and industry conditions that are expected to be representative of current indus-
try conditions.

Data characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering multiple plastic types,
and additive types.

Overall Quality Determination

High

Page 109 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 6311221 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:

U.S. EPA, (2001), Manufacture and use of printing ink - Generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental releases (revised draft).

HERO ID:

6311221

Conditions of Use:

Formulation and Use of Printing Inks



EXTRACTION

Parameter

Data

Description of release source:	PROC: Packaging disposal, material transfer, ink processing, equipment cleaningUSE: disposal/cleaning of ink container, cleaning printing equipment, ink drying

Release or emission factors:	Release or emission factors

Release frequency:	PROC: 250 days/yrUSE: 250 days/yr

Waste treatment methods and pollution control:	Waste treatment methods and pollution control

Comments:	QC Note: This is an early draft of the Printing Ink GS and may not provide the most up to data info

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Low
Medium

This GS is based on U.S. data

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Assessment is based on data greater than 20 years old.

Sample distribution characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering multiple printing appli-
cations, and multiple chemical functions

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 110 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 6385709 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	U.S. EPA, (1999). Flexographic printing - generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental releases: Draft.

HERO ID:	6385709

Conditions of Use: Flexographic Printing

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Description of release source:

Release or emission factors:

Release frequency:

Waste treatment methods and pollution control:

Equipment cleaning, fugitive air, stack air.
Release or emission factors
300 days/yr.

Waste treatment methods and pollution control



Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Low
Medium

This GS is based on U.S. data.

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Assessment is based on data greater than 20 years old.

Distribution of samples is characterized by a range with uncertain statistics. It is unclear
if analysis is representative.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Assessment or report clearly documents results, methods, and assumptions. Data
sources are generally described but not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Variability and uncertainty are not addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 111 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 6385710 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:

U.S. EPA, (2010). Manufacture and use of printing inks - generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental releases: Draft.

HERO ID:

6385710

Conditions of Use:

Formulation and Use of Printing Inks



EXTRACTION

Parameter

Data

Description of release source:	PROC: Packaging disposal, material transfer, ink processing, equipment cleaning. VOC and particulate emissions are expected from the unloading of raw materials

into the dispersion tank. Additional VOC emissions are expected as a result of heat-up losses and surface evaporation during the dispersion and milling operations
as well as during the loading of the final ink product into receiving containers. Additional environmental releases are expected from waste streams associated
with container and equipment cleaning.USE: disposal/cleaning of ink container, cleaning printing equipment, ink drying. A large portion of the releases from the
printing industry are associated with VOC emissions. These come from the volatile components in the printing inks as well as from various solvents that are used
for equipment cleaning. Air emissions are likely to result from unloading inks into the ink reservoirs on the printing press, the generation of ink mist during high
speed printing operations, and fugitive emissions from various source points in the printing process(e.g. ink reservoirs, drying ovens). Additional environmental
releases of chemicals contained in printing inks can result from residual ink wastes from container cleaning, and disposal of rags and solvents used to wipe down
and clean printing equipment.

Release quantity:	PROC: See Table 2-4 for 2007 TRI data. Air releases = 190,832 lb/yr, Surface water releases = 29 lb/yr, POTW/Wastewater releases = 823 lb/yr, Land releases

= 5,561 lb/yr, Other disposal = 51,303 lb/yr.USE: See Table 2-5 for 2007 TRI data based on the type of printing. Depending on the type of printing, Air releases
= 14,150 to 5,865,923 lb/yr, Surface water releases = 0 to 275 lb/yr, Wastewater releases = 0 to 3,200 lb/yr, Land releases = 11 to 18,619 lb/yr, Other disposal =
1,767 to 210,010 lb/yr.

Waste treatment methods and pollution control: Waste treatment methods and pollution control

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Medium
Medium

This GS is based on U.S. data

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

The GS is more than 10 years but no more than 20 years old.

Sample distribution characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability not addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 112 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 6385711 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	U.S. EPA, (2014). Use of additives in the thermoplastic converting industry - generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental

releases.

HERO ID:	6385711

Conditions of Use: Plastics Converting

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Description of release source:

Release quantity:

Release or emission factors:

Release frequency:

Waste treatment methods and pollution control:

Container cleaning, spillage, unloading, dusts and fugitive emissions from converting, equipment cleaning, trimming wastes
Provides models for estimating various releases.

Release or emission factors
137-254 days/yr

Waste treatment methods and pollution control

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Medium
Medium

This GS is based on U.S. data

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Assessment is generally based on data greater than 10 years old but no more than 20
years old and industry conditions that are expected to be representative of current indus-
try conditions.

Sample distribution characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering multiple plastic and
additive types.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 113 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 6385719 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:

U.S. EPA, (2004), Spray coatings in the furniture industry - generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental releases: Draft,

HERO ID:

6385719

Conditions of Use:

Commercial Use: Furniture Coating Application



EXTRACTION

Parameter

Data

Description of release source:	container cleaning, equipment cleaning, coating application (overspray), volatile air emissions

Release or emission factors:	nan

Release frequency:	250 days/yr

Waste treatment methods and pollution control:	Waste treatment methods and pollution control

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Low
Medium

This GS is based on U.S. data

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Assessment is based on data greater than 20 years old.

Sample distribution characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering various chemical func-
tions and wood vs metal furniture uses.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 114 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 6385748 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:
HERO ID:
Conditions of Use:

U.S. EPA, (2014). Use of additive in plastic compounding - generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental releases: Draft.
6385748

Processing - Additive in Plastic Compounding

EXTRACTION

Parameter

Data

Description of release source:
Release quantity:

Release or emission factors:
Release frequency:

Unloading containers, spillage, Container cleaning, dusts and fugitive emissions from compounding, equipment cleaning, loading. Releases to water, air, land.

Provides models for estimating various releases to air, water, and land

nan

148-264 days/yr

Waste treatment methods and pollution control: Waste treatment methods and pollution control

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Medium
Medium

This GS is based on U.S. data

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Assessment is generally based on data greater than 10 years old but no more than 20
years old and industry conditions that are reasonably expected to be representative of
current industry conditions.

Data characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering multiple plastic types,
and additive types.

Overall Quality Determination

High

Page 115 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 8726956 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	U.S. EPA, (1994). Generic scenario: Formulation of latex/emulsion coatings.

HERO ID:	8726956

Conditions of Use: Processing - incorporation into formulation, mixture, or reaction product for Paint and coating manufacturing (specifically latex/emulsion
coatings)

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Description of release source:

Release or emission factors:

Waste treatment methods and pollution control:

equipment cleaning, drying of latex wastes, off-spec and QC samples, unused raw materials, filters, volatiles from mixing

nan

nan

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality information/data from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Low
Medium

This GS is based on U.S. data

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Assessment is based on data greater than 20 years old.

Sample distributions characterized by ranges/estimations with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented, but underlying data sources
are not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Variability and uncertainty are not addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 116 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 7349060 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:

Canada,, G.o. (2020). Phthalate substance grouping - Information sheet.

HERO ID:

7349060

Conditions of Use:

All



EXTRACTION

Parameter

Data

Description of release source:	In Canada, these substances have the potential to be released to the environment, primarily to air and water. Releases may occur during their manufacturing and

processing, including transportation and storage, and during the production, use and disposal of products containing them (for example, "down the drain" releases
into wastewater systems from use in cosmetics), (p. 4 of 10).

Comments:	DCHP specifically mentioned as one of the substances of concern.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

Low

The data, data sources, and/or techniques or methods used in the assessment or report
are not specified.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:

Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
High
High

N/A

Report is from Canada.

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
The report captures operations, equipment, and worker activities expected to be repre-
sentative of current conditions. The report is generally no more than 10 years old.
Data is qualitative.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Assessment or report provides results, but the underlying methods, data sources, and
assumptions are not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

The report does not address variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 117 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 9641570 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:
HERO ID:
Conditions of Use:

Canada,, G.o. (2019). Page 5 - Fifth report on human biomonitoring of environmental chemicals in Canada.

9641570

All

Parameter

EXTRACTION

Data

Description of release source:

PDF Pg. 5"Releases to the environment are associated with anthropogenic activities (Environment and Climate Change Canada and Health Canada, 2017).
Releases may occur during the manufacture and processing of phthalates, including transportation and storage, as well as during the production, use, and disposal
of products that contain phthalates (Environment and Climate Change Canada and Health Canada, 2017). Although release into air may occur, water is expected
to be the primary receiving medium for phthalates, and occurs through wastewater effluents from industrial sources and disperse releases from consumer products
(Environment and Climate Change Canada and Health Canada, 2017; Environment Canada and Health Canada 2015d)."

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Report uses high quality data from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
High
High
N/A

Data are from Canada, an OECD country.

Data are for many in-scope occupational scenarios.

Report is based on current industry conditions and data no more than 10 years old.
N/A - Description of release source.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

N/A

N/A - Description of release source.

Overall Quality Determination

High

Page 118 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 664488 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:
HERO ID:
Conditions of Use:

CDC, (2009). Fourth national report on human exposure to environmental chemicals.
664488

Use of plastic articles

Parameter

EXTRACTION

Data

Description of release source: Because they are not chemically bound to the plastics to which they are added, phthalates can be released into the environment during use or disposal of the

product.

Domain

EVALUATION

Metric Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1: Methodology	High	The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods

that are from frequently used sources (e.g., European Union or OECD reports, NIOSH
HHEs, journal articles, Kirk-Othmer) and are generally accepted by the scientific com-
munity, and associated information does not indicate flaws or quality issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:

Metric 3:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Metric 4: Temporal Representativeness

Metric 5: Sample Size

High	The data are from the United States and are representative of the industry being evalu-

ated.

Medium The report is for a non-occupational scenario that is similar to an occupational scenario
within the scope of the risk evaluation, such as a consumer DIY scenario that is similar
to a worker scenario. Does provide helpful information for occupational release analysis
Medium The report captures operations, equipment, and worker activities that are expected to be
reasonably representative of current conditions. The report is generally more than 10
years but no more than 20 years old.

N/A	Information is qualitative

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Assessment or report clearly documents results, methods, and assumptions. Data
sources are generally described but not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

The report provides only limited discussion of the variability and uncertainty in the
results.

Overall Quality Determination

Medium





Page 119 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 10442901 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:

CEPE, (2020), SpERC fact sheet: Industrial application of coatings by spraying.

HERO ID:

10442901

Conditions of Use:

Paints and coatings



EXTRACTION

Parameter

Data

Description of release source:	Industrial application of coatings by spraying

Release or emission factors:	Release or emission factors

Release frequency:	Continuous release: 225 d/y. Typical industry situation (5 working days a week, shut down for vacation, no need for continuous shift).

Waste treatment methods and pollution control:	Waste treatment methods and pollution control

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

Medium

Emission factors and release frequency come from emission scenario documents (ESDs)
and expert information.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
Medium

High
Low

The data are from an OECD country other than the U.S.

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation. How-
ever, DCHP is not mentioned.

The report is generally no more than 10 years old.

Distribution of samples used to determine emission factors and release frequency are not
provided.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Assessment or report clearly documents results, methods, and assumptions. Data
sources are generally described but not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

The report does not address variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 120 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 10442902 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	CEPE, (2020). SpERC fact sheet: Professional application of coatings and inks by spraying.

HERO ID:	10442902

Conditions of Use: Paints and Coatings, Inks, toner and colorant products

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Description of release source:

Release or emission factors:

Release frequency:

Waste treatment methods and pollution control:

Professional application of coatings and inks by spraying
Release or emission factors

Indoor - CEPE SPERC 8a.3a.v2, CEPE SPERC 8c.3a.v2, 365 d/yOutdoor - CEPE SPERC 8d.3a.v2, CEPE SPERC 8f.3a.v2, 225 d/y
Waste treatment methods and pollution control

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

Medium

Emission factors and release frequency come from emission scenario documents (ESDs)
and expert information.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
Medium

High
Low

The data are from an OECD country other than the U.S.

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation. How-
ever, DCHP is not mentioned.

The report is generally no more than 10 years old.

Distribution of samples used to determine emission factors and release frequency are not
provided.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Assessment or report clearly documents results, methods, and assumptions. Data
sources are generally described but not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

The report does not address variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 121 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 10186827 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Cordeiro, C. F., Petrocelli, F. P. (2005). Vinyl acetate polymers.

HERO ID:	10186827

Conditions of Use: Plasticizer in adhesive manufacturing

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Waste treatment methods and pollution control:

nan





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods that
are from frequently used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:

Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High

Medium

Medium
N/A

The data are from the United States and are representative of the industry being evalu-
ated.

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation, but
information is not chemical specific.

The report is generally more than 10 years but no more than 20 years old.

No sample data.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Assessment or report clearly documents results, methods, and assumptions. Data
sources are generally described but not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

N/A

No scope to address variability and uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination

High





Page 122 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 8338316 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Giuliani, A., Zuccarini, M., Cichelli, A., Khan, H., Reale, M. (2020). Critical Review on the Presence of Phthalates in Food and Evidence of Their

Biological Impact. International lournal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(16): 1-43.

HERO ID:	8338316

Conditions of Use: industrial use of plastics to food contact applications

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Description of release source:	PAEs were presumably released from the plastic bags used duringthe plum picking and storing even before the beginning of the production process. (P. 5/45)These

compounds can be easily released from plastics to water, food, soil, air, making them ubiquitous environmental contaminants .Accidental release from packaging
materials. (P.l/45)

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Peer reviewed and published journal article.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
Uninformative

High
N/A

Data from a OECD country, Italy.

The data are for an occupational scenario of food contact material, which is FDA regu-
lated therefore outside of the scope of the risk evaluation.

The operations, equipment, and worker activities associated with the data are expected
to be representative of current operations, equipment, and activities. The data are no
more than 10 years old.

No sampling data

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

Assessment or report clearly documents its data sources, assessment methods, results,
and assumptions.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

The report does not address variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	Uninformative

Page 123 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 4168432 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Hahladakis, J. N., Velis, C. A., Weber, R., Iacovidou, E., Purnell, P. (2018). An overview of chemical additives present in plastics: Migration, release, fate

and environmental impact during their use, disposal and recycling, lournal of Hazardous Materials 344:179-199.

HERO ID:	4168432

Conditions of Use: Disposal of plastics

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Description of release source:	Migration from the plastics (plasticizers are not bound to the polymer) to air or contact material, disposal of waste plastics to landfill, energy recovery, incineration,

or recycling. In general, VOCs could be emitted from polymers and additive pyrolysis at recycling operating temperatures, and the types and concentrations of
VOCs emitted mainly depended on the plastic composition during the extrusion process [182],

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods that
are from frequently used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:

Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
Medium

High

N/A

Article is from an OECD country.

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation, but
data is general and not specific to DCHP.

The report captures operations, equipment, and worker activities expected to be repre-
sentative of current conditions. The report is generally no more than 10 years old.
No sample data.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

Assessment or report clearly documents its data sources, assessment methods, results,
and assumptions.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

N/A

No scope to address variability and uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 124 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 4728432 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation: Lu, X., Xu, X., Lin, Y„ Zhang, Y„ Huo, X. (2018).

25(21 ):20550-20561.

HERO ID: 4728432

Conditions of Use: Consumer use of plastic products

Phthalate exposure as a risk factor for hypertension. Environmental Science and Pollution Research

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Description of release source:

Being not covalently bound with polyvinyl chloride, phthalates can leach, migrate, and volatilize over time into environmental media such as indoor air, atmo-
sphere, and foodstuff (Ait Bamai et al. 2014).

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods
that are from frequently used sources (e.g., European Union or OECD reports, NIOSH
HHEs, journal articles, Kirk-Othmer) and are generally accepted by the scientific com-
munity, and associated information does not indicate flaws or quality issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:

Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Low

Low

High
N/A

The data are from a non-OECD country, and locality-specific factors (e.g., potentially
greater differences in regulatory occupational exposure or emission limits, industry/pro-
cess technologies) may impact exposures or releases relative to the U.S., or the country
of origin is not specified.

The report is for a non-occupational scenario that is similar to an occupational scenario
within the scope of the risk evaluation (consumer use of plastic products similar to com-
mercial/industrial use of plastic products).

The report captures operations, equipment, and worker activities expected to be repre-
sentative of current conditions. The report is generally no more than 10 years old.
Information is qualitative

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

Assessment or report clearly documents its data sources, assessment methods, results,
and assumptions.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

N/A

No scope to address variability and uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination

Medium





Page 125 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 10472417 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	RFCI, (2020). Comments of the Resilient Floor Covering Institute (RFCI) on the Safer Products for Washington Priority Consumer Products draft report

to Legislature.

HERO ID:	10472417

Conditions of Use: Disposal of vinyl flooring

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Description of release source:

Release or emission factors:

Waste treatment methods and pollution control:

Releases from disposal of vinyl flooring (landfills). Lifespan of vinyl flooring is 30 - 50 years,
nan

Waste treatment methods and pollution control

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

Medium

The data reported references an RFCI product declaration report which is not a fre-
quently used source, but does not indicate flaws or quality issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:

Geographic Scope

High

The data are from the United States and are representative of the industry being evalu-
ated.

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation. How-
ever, DCHP is not mentioned specifically.

The report is generally no more than 10 years old.

Distribution of samples is characterized by a range with uncertain statistics. It is unclear
if analysis is representative.

Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium

High
Medium

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Assessment or report clearly documents results, methods, and assumptions. Data
sources are generally described but not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability is described through the various types of materials used for vinyl flooring.
However, uncertainty related to the quantity released to landfills annually is not charac-
terized.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 126 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 9493521 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Schripp, T., Wensing, M. (2009). Emission of VOCs and SVOCs from electronic devices and office equipment. :405-430.

HERO ID:	9493521

Conditions of Use: Commercial use: Plastic and Rubber Products/ Electronic Products

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Description of release source:
Comments:

DCHP is listed as a selected compound identified from emissions of television sets and VCRs. No emission data specified.
Emission factors are provided for other chemicals, but none specifically for phthalates.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods.
Published book chapter.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium

High
Medium
N/A

The data are from an OECD country other than the U.S.

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Information is more than 10 years but no more than 20 years old
N/A- no sampling data extracted

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Assessment or report clearly documents sources, methods, and assumptions. Results are
generally described but not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

The report provides only limited discussion of the variability and uncertainty in the
results.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 127 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 4565597 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:

U.S. EPA, (2012). Phthalates action plan.



HERO ID:

4565597



Conditions of Use:

General industrial manufacturing, processing, or use







EXTRACTION

Parameter

Data



Description of release source:	Phthalates are released to the environment from multiple sources including industrial releases, the disposal of manufacturing, processing and industrial wastes,

municipal solid waste, land application of sewage sludge, and release from products containing phthalates. Only two (DBP and DEHP) of the 8 phthalates are
listed on EPA's Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) list of toxic chemicals. The available release data for these two phthalates indicate that releases of phthalates can
be expected to all primary environmental media.

EVALUATION

Domain	Metric	Rating	Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods
that are from frequently used sources (e.g., European Union or OECD reports, NIOSH
HHEs, journal articles, Kirk-Othmer) and are generally accepted by the scientific com-
munity, and associated information does not indicate flaws or quality issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:

Geographic Scope

High

The data are from the United States and are representative of the industry being evalu-
ated.

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation but data
is general and not specific to DCHP.

The report captures operations, equipment, and worker activities expected to be repre-
sentative of current conditions. The report is generally no more than 10 years old.
No sample data.

Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
High
N/A

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

Assessment or report clearly documents its data sources, assessment methods, results,
and assumptions.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

N/A

No scope to address variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination

High





Page 128 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 9102546 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation: U.S. EPA, (2002). An evaluation of flexographic inks on
HERO ID: 9102546

Conditions of Use: Inks, toner and colorant products

wide-web film: Summary booklet.

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Release or emission factors:

Waste treatment methods and pollution control:

Release or emission factors

Waste treatment methods and pollution control



Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods that
are from frequently used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:

Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High

Medium

Low
N/A

The data are from the United States and are representative of the industry being evalu-
ated.

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation but
information is not chemical specific.

The report is more than 20 years old.

No sample data.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Assessment or report clearly documents results, methods, and assumptions. Data
sources are generally described but not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability is addressed by including different ink systems but uncertainty is not ad-
dressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 129 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Environmental Releases

HERO ID: 9109783 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	U.S. EPA, (1977). Industrial process profiles for environmental use: Chapter 13. Plasticizers industry.

HERO ID:	9109783

Conditions of Use: Waste

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Description of release source:
Release or emission factors:

Distillation of crude products, from condensate, from steam striping, from catalysts neutralization and crude product washing operations, and from filter backwash.
(P. 25/86)

Release or emission factors

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
Low
Medium

The data are from the United States

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
The report is more than 20 years old.

Distribution of samples is characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Assessment or report clearly documents results, methods, and assumptions. Data
sources are generally described but not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

The report does not address variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 130 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 3688160 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	EC/HC, (2015). State of the science report: Phthalate substance grouping: Medium-chain phthalate esters: Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Numbers:

84-61-7; 84-64-0; 84-69-5; 523-31-9; 5334-09-8;16883-83-3; 27215-22-1; 27987-25-3; 68515-40-2; 71888-89-6.

HERO ID:	3688160

Conditions of Use: Production and life cycle

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Production, import, or use volume: Production and use of DCHP in US estimated to be <227,000 kg in 2006 (Table 4-2).

Life cycle description:	Major uses identified for DCHP are in adhesives and sealants used in construction and/or in the automotive sector. Other applications of medium-chain phthalates

in the automotive industry include their addition to automotive paints and coatings or to resins that are then molded into automobile parts (p. 3 and Tab 5-1).

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods
that are from a frequently used source (e.g., European Union or OECD reports, NIOSH
HHEs, journal articles, Kirk-Othmer) and are generally accepted by the scientific com-
munity, and associated information does not indicate flaws or quality issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness

Medium
High
High

The data are from an OECD country other than the U.S. (Canada).

The assessment is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.

The assessment captures operations, equipment, and worker activities expected to be

representative of current conditions. EPA has no reason to believe exposures have

changed. The completed exposure or risk assessment is generally no more than 10 years

old.

Distribution of samples is characterized by a range with uncertain statistics. It is unclear
if analysis is representative.

Metric 5:

Sample Size

Medium

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

Assessment or report clearly documents its data sources, assessment methods, results,
and assumptions.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

High

The assessment addresses variability and uncertainty in the results. Uncertainty is well
characterized.

Overall Quality Determination

High





Page 131 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 1335811 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:

Marx, J. L. (1972). Phthalic acid esters: Biological impact uncertain. Science 46(4056):46-47.

HERO ID:

1335811

Conditions of Use:

Manufacturing



EXTRACTION

Parameter

Data

Production, import, or use volume: Approximately 1 billion pounds of phthalic acid esters were made in 1972.

Chemical concentration:	Phthalate plasticizers may account for as much as 40 percent of the final weight of PVC.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

Medium

Assessment uses high quality data that are not from frequently-used sources and there
are no known quality issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:

Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Low

N/A

Data are from the U.S.

The data is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation but data
is general to phthalates and not specific to DCHP.

Assessment is based on data greater than 20 years old and industry conditions that are
expected to be outdated.

No sample data.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented, but underlying data sources
are not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

N/A

No scope to address variability and uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 132 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 3808976 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:
HERO ID:
Conditions of Use:

OECD, (2011). Emission scenario document on coating application via spray-pain ting in the automotive refinishing industry.
3808976

Use - Automotive Coating Application

EXTRACTION

Parameter

Data

Production, import, or use volume:
Life cycle description:

Process description:

Throughput:

Number of sites:

Chemical concentration:

"54,633,000 total gallons automotive refinish coatings/yr 99,747 - 1,097,457 gallons coating/yr (depending on coating type)"

Automotive Coating Application

Repair/replace automotive surface, initial wash (water/detergent and/or solvent), sanding (dry or wet), mixing of primer coatings, spray paint (multiple layers
of primer), curing/drying each layer, sanding (dry or wet), solvent wipe-down, mixing of each coating (basecoat and clearcoat), spray paint (multiple layers of
basecoat and clearcoat), curing/drying each layer

Op days: 250 days/yr. 0.25-12 gal coating/site-day, depending on number of jobs Also provides method for adjusting the use rate based on the type of coating

product used

32,296

15-25%

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Low
Medium

This ESD was developed by EPA based on U.S. data

Data is for multiple in-scope occupational scenarios; however, data is general and not
specific to a chemical.

Assessment is based on data greater than 20 years old.

Sample distribution characterized by limited statistics (min, max, mean) but discrete
samples not provided and distribution not fully characterized.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering multiple coating types.

Overall Quality Determination

Medium

Page 133 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 3827298 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:
HERO ID:
Conditions of Use:

OECD, (2009). Emission scenario documents on coating industry (paints, lacquers and varnishes).
3827298

Processing and Use: Formulation of Coatings and Use of Coatings

Parameter

EXTRACTION

Data

Production, import, or use volume:
Life cycle description:

Process description:

Throughput:

Number of sites:

Chemical concentration:

3.2 million tonnes coating/yr
Formulation of Coatings and Use of Coatings

PROC: Dispersion, milling, finishing, filling USE: Application via roller/brush, air spray systems, airless and air-assisted airless spray systems, electrostatic spray,

electrodeposition/electrocoating and autodeposition, dip coating, flow and curtain coating, roll coating, and supercritical carbon dioxide coating systems

0.62-9.01/vehicle (auto refinishing); 1.1-5.1 g coating/can (metal can coating sites)

In the UK and the EU: 60,330 automotive application sites; 33 metal coating application sites

Provides conc. estimates based on the chemical function, not chemical specific.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
Medium

Medium
Medium

This ESD was not developed by EPA, but another OECD-member country.

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific

to a chemical.

Assessment is generally based on data greater than 10 years old but no more than 20
years old and industry conditions that are expected to be representative of current indus-
try conditions.

Sample distribution characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering multiple chemical func-
tions and coating types.

Overall Quality Determination

Medium

Page 134 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 3827299 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:
HERO ID:
Conditions of Use:

OECD, (2009). Emission scenario document on adhesive formulation.
3827299

Processing: Adhesives and sealants

Parameter

EXTRACTION

Data

Production, import, or use volume:
Life cycle description:

Process description:

Throughput:

Number of sites:

Chemical concentration:

15.8-4,990 million kg adhesive/yr
Formulation of Adhesives

Unloading raw materials from containers into mixing vessel, mixing, packaging/on-site storage

Batch size: 4000 kg or 1,000 gallons of adhesive/bt. Op days and batches per day: Equal to the number of batches. Provides methodology for estimating
throughput based on the amount of adhesive produced, and the concentration of the chemical in the adhesive

Provides methodology for estimating number of sites based on chemical PV, the adhesive use rate, and the concentration of the chemical in the adhesive formulation
Provides conc. estimates based on chemical function, not chemical specific.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Medium
Medium

This ESD was developed by EPA based on U.S. data

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Assessment is generally based on data greater than 10 years old but no more than 20
years old and industry conditions that are expected to be representative of current indus-
try conditions.

Sample distribution characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering various chemical func-
tions and types of adhesives.

Overall Quality Determination

High

Page 135 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 3827300 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:
HERO ID:
Conditions of Use:

OECD, (2013). Emission scenario document on the industrial use of adhesives for substrate bonding.
3827300

Use of adhesives for substrate bonding

EXTRACTION

Parameter

Data

Production, import, or use volume:
Life cycle description:

Process description:

Throughput:

Number of sites:

Chemical concentration:

1,500 - 9,100,000 kg adhesive/site-yr
Adhesive Application

unloading, dilute and mix (optional), application (roll, spray, curtain, bead/syringe), drying/curing, product finishing

Op days: 50-365 days/yr. Provides methodology for estimating throughput based on the amount of adhesives used, and the concentration of the chemical in the

formulation

541-22,294

Provides conc. estimates based on chemical function and adhesive type, not chemical specific.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Medium
Medium

This ESD was developed by EPA based on U.S. data

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Assessment is generally based on data greater than 10 years old but no more than 20
years old and industry conditions that are expected to be representative of current indus-
try conditions.

Sample distribution characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering various chemical func-
tions, types of adhesives, and end use markets.

Overall Quality Determination

High

Page 136 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 3840003 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	OECD, (2010). Emission scenario document on formulation of radiation curable coatings, inks and adhesives.

HERO ID:	3840003

Conditions of Use: Processing: Paints and Coatings

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Production, import, or use volume:
Life cycle description:

Process description:

Throughput:

Number of sites:

Chemical concentration:

0.7-69.87 million kg coating/ink/adhesive/yr
Formulation of Coatings, inks, and adhesives

Preheating (optional), Unloading raw materials from containers into mixing kettle, mixing, filtering, packaging

Op days: 250 days/yr. Provides methodology for estimating throughput based on the amount of product produced, and the concentration of the chemical in the
formulation

Provides methodology for estimating number of sites based on chemical PV, the use rate, and the concentration of the chemical in the formulation
Provides conc. estimates based on chemical function, not chemical specific.

EVALUATION

Domain	Metric	Rating	Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1: Methodology	High	Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Low
Medium

This ESD was developed by EPA based on U.S. data

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Assessment is based on data greater than 20 years old.

Sample distribution characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering various chemical func-
tions and types of UV curable products.

Overall Quality Determination

Medium





Page 137 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 5079084 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	OECD, (2009). Emission scenario document on plastic additives.

HERO ID:	5079084

Conditions of Use: Processing - Plastic Additives

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Production, import, or use volume:
Life cycle description:

Process description:

Throughput:

Number of sites:
Chemical concentration:

Provides % of polymers used for various end-use applications
Plastics Compounding and Converting

Provides descriptions for a variety of closed, partially open, and open compounding and converting processing. Including the following compounding processes:
tumbling, ball blending, gravity mixers, paddle mixers, intensive vortex mixers, banbury mixers, two roll mills, and extruder mixing. And the following converting
processes: extrusion, injection molding, compression mulding, extrusion blow molding, injection blow molding, film extrusion, extrusion coating, thermoforming,
calendering, hand lay up, spray techniques, and filament winding. ESD also provides a break down of the % and volume of polymers used in each process in the
UK.

Provides methodology for estimating throughput of polymers and additives
4000 sites in UK

Provides conc. estimates based on additive function in various plastics, not chemical specific.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1: Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium This ESD was not developed by EPA, but another OECD-member country.

Medium Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Low	Assessment from 2009 but is based on data greater than 20 years old.

Medium Sample distribution characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering prevalence of various
processing methods, additive functions, and plastics.

Overall Quality Determination

Medium





Page 138 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6306753 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	OECD, (2011). Emission scenario document on the chemical industry.

HERO ID:	6306753

Conditions of Use: Manufacture, processing, use

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Life cycle description:
Process description:

Manufacture, Formulation of processing aids, processing as a reactant, use of processing aids

General synthesis process consists of reaction, handling/transportation, isolation, handling/transportation, purification, handling/transportation, then either reaction
to make another chemical or on to the next life cycle stage

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
Medium

Low
N/A

This ESD was not developed by EPA, but another OECD-member country.

Data are for multiple in-scope occupational scenarios; however, data is general and not

specific to a chemical.

Assessment from 2011 but is based on data greater than 20 years old.

N/A - This metric is not applicable to the data being extracted (process description only)

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

N/A

N/A - This metric is not applicable to the data being extracted (process description only)

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 139 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6393282 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	OECD, (2009). Emission scenario document on transport and storage of chemicals.

HERO ID:	6393282

Conditions of Use: Transportation and Storage (Processing, distribution in commerce)

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Production, import, or use volume:
Process description:

Number of sites:

11 million tonnes shipped via rail tankers 30 million tonnes shipped via pipelines

On-site storage of chemicals, filling of containers, transport to distributors/downstream users/consumers, containers with residual chemical transported to recy-
cling/cleaning or disposal site, empty/cleaned containers returned to distributor or production site

Container cleaning sites in UK: 40 for road tankers; 8 for steel drums; 8 for plastics drums; 6 for fibre drums; 13 for IBCs; 7 for hazardous waste containers

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
Medium

Low
Medium

This ESD was not developed by EPA, but another OECD-member country.

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific

to a chemical.

Assessment is based on data greater than 20 years old.

Sample distribution characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering multiple chemical
forms, containers and storage system types.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 140 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6311222 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Science Applications International Corporation, (1996). Generic scenario for automobile spray coating: Draft report.

HERO ID:	6311222

Conditions of Use: Automotive Coating Application

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Production, import, or use volume:
Process description:

Throughput:

Number of sites:

Auto OEM: 166,00 cars painted/yr. Autorefinish: 70-2,000 L paints/yr.

Pretreatment (wash) of car body, E-coat (dip), oven/cure, primer (spray), oven/cure, basecoat (spray), oven/cure, clearcoat (Spray), oven/cure
Auto OEM: 250 days/yr. Autorefinish: 170 days/yr.

Auto OEM: 61 sites. Autorefinish: 1000's of sites.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Low
Medium

This GS is based on U.S. data

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Assessment is based on data greater than 20 years old.

Sample distribution characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering OEM and refinish ap-
plications.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 141 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 10480466 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:

HERO ID:
Conditions of Use:

U.S. EPA, (2023). Use of laboratory chemicals - Generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental releases (Revised draft generic

scenario).

10480466

Use - Laboratory Chemicals

Parameter

EXTRACTION

Data

Production, import, or use volume:
Life cycle description:

Process description:

Throughput:

Number of sites:

Chemical concentration:

Provides methodology to estimate annual use rate.

Laboratory Chemicals

Receive chemicals, weigh or measure chemical, add chemical to labware, dilute/add other laboratory chemicals, add sample, run analytical testing, dispose of
sample and laboratory chemical waste

260 days/yr ; 255 grams reagent/site-day (average); 2,000 mL reagent/site-day (average); Table 3-2 gives daily throughput for laboratory stock solutions
Provides methodology to estimate number of sites based on chemical production volume, annual throughput - 40,639 total establishments
Provides conc. estimates based on the chemical function, not chemical specific.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality information/data from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

High
Medium

This GS is based on U.S. data

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Assessment is based on current industry conditions and data no more than 10 years old.
Sample distribution characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering different chemical
functions

Overall Quality Determination

High

Page 142 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 11182966 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:

U.S. EPA, (2022). Chemical repackaging - Generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental releases (revised draft).

HERO ID:

11182966

Conditions of Use:

Repackaging



EXTRACTION

Parameter

Data

Production, import, or use volume: Table B-l presents PMN data on repackaging rate in kg chemical/site-yr.

Process description:	Pre-manufacture notices (PMN) submitted from 2010 to 2020 under EPA's New Chemicals Program indicated imported and repackaged chemicals can be solids

or liquids and may be neat or in solutions/mixtures and contained in various packaging types. After they arrive at the repackaging site, repackaging operations
occur where the chemical is transferred from the transport container it was imported in to a new one of a different size in order to meet the customer's needs
(JACO, 2021). Chemicals may also be transferred from original containers to intermediate storage containers before packaging into smaller containers (Cooke,
2013; NIOSH, 2009). Chemicals are expected to be received at repackaging sites in drums or larger bulk containers (supersacks, totes, tank trucks, etc.) (Cooke,
2013; NIOSH, 2009). The chemical of interest may be received in its final formulation and transferred directly from these large containers into smaller containers,
charged to a temporary storage tank, or it may be charged to a mixing tank and diluted or mixed with other chemicals before it is repackaged. Once the chemical
has been formulated to desired specifications, it can be repackaged. Workers may be potentially exposed during the unloading of chemicals from the original
transport containers into temporary storage or new transport containers. Releases of chemicals may also occur during this stage, from open container surfaces
(e.g., if the chemical is volatile), transfer operations (e.g., if the chemical is volatile or a powder), and original transport container disposal.Repackaging operations
for liquid chemicals typically involve pouring or pumping the product from the original containers or mixing /storage tanks into the new containers. A study
conducted by the Health and Safety Laboratory in the U.K. investigated two chemical repackaging sites (Cooke, 2013). At both of these sites the chemical was
delivered to the site by road tanker and pumped into dedicated storage tanks. One of the sites, a hydrazine supplier, pumped the hydrazine into a mixing vessel
where it was diluted with water and packaged into smaller containers for sale to customers. At the other site, trichloroethylene was pumped from storage tanks into
a closed loop system where workers using a hydraulic lance connected to a semi-automated filling system transferred the chemical into new containers (Cooke,
2013). The usual process for repackaging solid chemicals differs from the processes for liquids. A NIOSH Health Hazard Evaluation Report (HHE) from 2009
investigated a repackaging facility that was transferring bulk shipments of silane-coated glass beads ranging between 0.2 - 1.2mm in diameter. At this facility,
2,200 lb supersacks of the product are lifted with a forklift over a metal bin, then cutting the bottom of the container with a knife to empty the beads into the bin.
The metal bin is then lifted by a forklift, and the glass beads are poured into hoppers. From the hoppers the beads are gravity fed into smaller cardboard boxes or
paper sacks that are shipped to customers (NIOSH, 2009). Workers may be potentially exposed during the transfer of chemicals from temporary storage into new
transport containers. Releases of chemicals may also occur during this stage from open container surfaces (e.g., if the chemical is volatile), transfer operations
(e.g., if the chemical is volatile or a powder), and cleaning any equipment that was used in during the process.

Number of sites:	Table 1-2 presents the number of repackaging sites based on 2019 U.S. Census data.

Chemical concentration:	A fraction of completed IRERs from 2010-2020 were reviewed, 21 submissions contained information on chemical repackaging. In these submissions, chemicals

were repackaged at concentrations ranging from 1% to 100%, with a 50th percentile of 93%, a 95th percentile of 100%, and a mode of 100%.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality information/data from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness

High
Medium

Medium

This GS is based on U.S. data.

Data are for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Assessment is based on data greater than 10 years old but no more than 20 years old and
industry conditions that are expected to be representative of current industry conditions.

Continued on next page ...

Page 143 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: i 1182966 Table: 1 of 1

... continued from previous page

Study Citation:
HERO ID:
Conditions of Use:

U.S. EPA, (2022). Chemical repackaging ¦

11182966

Repackaging

- Generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental releases (revised draft).

Domain



Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments



Metric 5:

Sample Size

High

Statistical distribution of samples is fully characterized (discrete use amounts provided).

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering multiple repackaging
facilities.

Overall Quality Determination

High





Page 144 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 3827195 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:

U.S. EPA, (2014). Generic scenario draft on the use of additives in plastic compounding.

HERO ID:

3827195

Conditions of Use:

Plastics Compounding



EXTRACTION

Parameter

Data

Process description:	Polymer pellets/resins received, blending/compounding into masterbatch, extrusion/shaping, packaging.

Throughput:	Provides methodology for estimating throughput based on the amount of plastic produced, and the concentration of the chemical additive in the plastic. 148-264

days/yr.

Number of sites:	Provides methodology for estimating number of sites based on chemical PV, the amount of plastic produced, and the concentration of the chemical additive in the

plastic.

Chemical concentration:	Provides conc. estimates based on additive function in various plastics, not chemical specific.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Medium
Medium

This GS is based on U.S. data

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Assessment is generally based on data greater than 10 years old but no more than 20
years old and industry conditions that are expected to be representative of current indus-
try conditions.

Sample distribution characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering multiple plastic and
additive types.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 145 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6304171 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:

U.S. EPA, (2004), Use of additives in foamed plastics - generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental releases - Draft,

HERO ID:

6304171

Conditions of Use:

Flexible and Rigid Polyurethane Foam Manufacture



EXTRACTION

Parameter

Data

Production, import, or use volume: 2,365 million lbs polurethan foam/yr. 6,442 million lbs polysytrene/yr (page 5 of 19)

Process description:	Converters mix plastic resins with additives, shaping/molding (page 7-11 has detailed description)

Number of sites:	566 total polystyrene sites, 610 total polyurethane foam sites (page 12 of 19)

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High

Medium
Low

This GS is based on U.S. data

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Assessment is generally based on data greater than 10 years old but no more than 20
years old and industry conditions that are expected to be representative of current indus-
try conditions.

Sample distribution is characterized by no statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering multiple foam types.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 146 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6311218 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:

HERO ID:
Conditions of Use:

Parameter

U.S. EPA, (2004). Additives in plastics processing (compounding) - generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental release -

Draft.

6311218

Processing as a reactant as a process regulator for Plastic material and resin manufacturing; incorporation into formulation, mixture,
or reaction product as a plasticizer for Plastics product manufacturing; incorporation into article as a plasticizer for Plastics product
manufacturing

EXTRACTION

Data

Production, import, or use volume:
Process description:

Throughput:

Number of sites:

Chemical concentration:
Comments:

provides the North American Production (lb/yr) of the types of Thermoplastics from 2003 -p. 3
Polymer pellets/resins received, blending/compounding into masterbatch, extrusion/shaping, packaging

'Provides methodology for estimating throughput based on the amount of plastic produced, and the concentration of the chemical additive in the plastic
'Provides methodology for estimating number of sites based on chemical PV, the amount of plastic produced, and the concentration of the chemical additive in
the plastic

'Provides conc. estimates based on additive function in various plastics, not chemical specific.

QC Note: This is an early draft of the Plastic Compounding GS and may not provide the most up to data info

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Medium
Medium

This GS is based on U.S. data

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Assessment is generally based on data greater than 10 years old but no more than 20
years old and industry conditions that are expected to be representative of current indus-
try conditions.

Sample distribution characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering multiple plastic and
additive types.

Overall Quality Determination

High

Page 147 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 63i 1221 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	U.S. EPA, (2001). Manufacture and use of printing ink - Generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental releases (revised draft).

HERO ID:	6311221

Conditions of Use: Formulation and Use of Printing Inks

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Production, import, or use volume:
Process description:

Throughput:

Number of sites:

Chemical concentration:
Comments:

11.9-373.8 million kg ink/yr (depending on printing application)

PROC: Vehicle consisting of resin, solvent, drying agents, and resin plasticizing oils is prepared, pigment blended into vehicle, fed to dispersing mill, raw ink let
down with additional solvent and other additives, packaged for sale.USE: Provides descriptions for lithography, gravure, flexography, letterpress, digital printing,
and screen printing.

Provides methodology for estimating throughput based on the amount of ink produced, and the concentration of the chemical in the ink for both PROC and USE

PROC: 13-239 (depending on printing application)USE: 454-18,622 (depending on printing application)

Provides conc. estimates based on chemical function, not chemical specific.

QC Note: This is an early draft of the Printing Ink GS and may not provide the most up to data info

EVALUATION

Domain	Metric	Rating	Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1: Methodology	High	Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Low
Medium

This GS is based on U.S. data

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Assessment is based on data greater than 20 years old.

Sample distribution characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering multiple printing appli-
cations, and multiple chemical functions

Overall Quality Determination

Medium





Page 148 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6385709 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	U.S. EPA, (1999). Flexographic printing - generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental releases: Draft.

HERO ID:	6385709

Conditions of Use: Flexographic Printing

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Process description:
Throughput:

Number of sites:
Chemical concentration:

ink received in drums, charged to ink chamber, flexographic press, ink in substrate product.

1,800 kg ink/site-day

Provides methodology to estimate number of sites based on ink use rate and concentration of chemical in ink.
1-10%, general additive concentration not chemical or function specific.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Low
Medium

This GS is based on U.S. data.

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Assessment is based on data greater than 20 years old.

Sample distribution characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Assessment or report clearly documents results, methods, and assumptions. Data
sources are generally described but not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Variability and uncertainty are not addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 149 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6385710 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:

U.S. EPA, (2010). Manufacture and use of printing inks - generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental releases: Draft.

HERO ID:

6385710

Conditions of Use:

Formulation and Use of Printing Inks



EXTRACTION

Parameter

Data

Life cycle description:	It was estimated that approximately 97% of all industrial end use printing activities can be categorized within five different printing processes: lithography

flexography, gravure, letterpress and screen printing

Process description:	PROC: Vehicle consisting of resin, solvent, drying agents, and resn plasticizing oils is prepared, pigment blended into vehicle, fed to dispersing mill, raw ink let

down with additional solvent and other additives, packaged for sale.USE: Provides descriptions for lithography, gravure, flexography, letterpress, digital priting,
and screen printing.

Number of sites:	See Table 2-2: A total of 4,221 sites from 2007 data

Chemical concentration:	Of the reviewed 15 chemicals, 8 chemicals were manufactured or imported in 100% concentration; 7 chemicals were manufactured or imported in concentrations

< 100%.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Medium
Medium

This GS is based on U.S. data

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

The GS is more than 10 years but no more than 20 years old.

Sample distribution characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability not addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 150 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6385711 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	U.S. EPA, (2014). Use of additives in the thermoplastic converting industry - generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental

releases.

HERO ID:	6385711

Conditions of Use: Plastics Converting

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Process description:
Throughput:

Number of sites:

Chemical concentration:

Compounded resins received, unloaded, forming/molding/shaping, trimming, finishing (including coating operations)

Provides methodology for estimating throughput based on the amount of plastic produced, and the concentration of the chemical additive in the plastic
Provides methodology for estimating number of sites based on chemical PV, the amount of plastic produced, and the concentration of the chemical additive in the
plastic

Provides conc. estimates based on additive function in various plastics, not chemical specific.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Medium
Medium

This GS is based on U.S. data

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Assessment is generally based on data greater than 10 years old but no more than 20
years old and industry conditions that are expected to be representative of current indus-
try conditions.

Sample distribution characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering multiple plastic and
additive types.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 151 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6385719 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:

U.S. EPA, (2004). Spray coatings in the furniture industry - generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental releases: Draft.

HERO ID:

6385719

Conditions of Use:

Commercial Use: Furniture Coating Application



EXTRACTION

Parameter

Data

Production, import, or use volume: Metal: 5,000-446,600 L coating/yrWood: 4,326-4,372 L coating/yr

Process description:	Metal furniture: Metal cleaning, coating unloaded, coating mixing, coating application (manual or automatic), flash-off, drying oven Wood furniture: coating

unloaded, coating mixing, coating application (manual or automatic), flash-off, drying oven, sanding and other finishing operations
Throughput:	Metal: 20-1,786 L coating/day Wood: 17.3-17.4 L coating/day

Number of sites:	152-8,176

Chemical concentration:	Provides conc. estimates based on chemical function, not chemical specific.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Low
Medium

This GS is based on U.S. data

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Assessment is based on data greater than 20 years old.

Sample distribution characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering various chemical func-
tions and wood vs metal furniture uses.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 152 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6385748 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:
HERO ID:
Conditions of Use:

U.S. EPA, (2014). Use of additive in plastic compounding - generic scenario for estimating occupational exposures and environmental releases: Draft.
6385748

Processing - Additive in Plastic Compounding

Parameter

EXTRACTION

Data

Life cycle description:
Process description:
Throughput:

Number of sites:

Chemical concentration:

Plastics Compounding

Polymer pellets/resins received, blending/compounding into masterbatch, extrusion/shaping, packaging

Op days: 148-264 days/yr. Provides methodology for estimating throughput based on the amount of plastic produced, and the concentration of the chemical
additive in the plastic

Provides methodology for estimating number of sites based on chemical PV, the amount of plastic produced, and the concentration of the chemical additive in the
plastic

Provides conc. estimates based on additive function in various plastics, not chemical specific.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data/techniques/methods from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Medium
Medium

This GS is based on U.S. data

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Assessment is generally based on data greater than 10 years old but no more than 20
years old and industry conditions that are expected to be representative of current indus-
try conditions.

Sample distribution characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering multiple plastic and
additive types.

Overall Quality Determination

High

Page 153 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 8726956 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	U.S. EPA, (1994). Generic scenario: Formulation of latex/emulsion coatings.

HERO ID:	8726956

Conditions of Use: Processing - incorporation into formulation, mixture, or reaction product for Paint and coating manufacturing (specifically latex/emulsion
coatings)

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Production, import, or use volume:
Process description:

Throughput:

Number of sites:

Chemical concentration:

450 MM gals of latex coatings/yr

Pigment dispoersion, mixing, add latex, QC check, hold and re-check QC, dispense and package

1000-5000 gal/bt

1000

'Provides conc. estimates based on the chemical function, not chemical specific.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality information/data from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Low
Medium

This GS is based on U.S. data

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to a chemical.

Assessment is based on data greater than 20 years old.

Sample distributions characterized by ranges/estimations with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented, but underlying data sources
are not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty not addressed. Variability addressed by considering different chemical
functions

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 154 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: i0369850 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	ACA, (2019). Comment submitted by Raleigh Davis, Assistant Director and Riaz Zaman, Counsel, Government Affairs, American Coatings Association

(ACA) regarding the proposed 20 high priority candidates for chemical risk evaluation.

HERO ID:	10369850

Conditions of Use: Adhesives

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Life cycle description:
Chemical concentration:

Plasticizer, additive and impurity in adhesives

The chemical is a plasticizer, additive and impurity in adhesives in amounts less then 1%.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

Low

The data and data sources used to determine concentration of DCHP as an impurity in
adhesives are not provided.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Low

The data are from the United States.

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
The report is generally no more than 10 years old.

Distribution of samples is not characterized.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Assessment or report provides results, but the underlying methods, data sources, and
assumptions are not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

The report does not address variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 155 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303159 Table: 1 of 2

Study Citation:	AG, H.D. (2017). HVU2 M8 - M30.

HERO ID:	6303159

Conditions of Use: Use of adhesives and sealants

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

1-3%
Powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
High
High
Medium

From an OECD country

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2022, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 156 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 6303159 Table: 2 of 2

Study Citation:	AG, H.D. (2017). HVU2 M8 - M30.

HERO ID:	6303159

Conditions of Use: Incorporation into adhesives and sealants

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

1-3%
Powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
High
High
Medium

From an OECD country

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2022, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 157 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 11437783 Table: 1 of 2

Study Citation:	AG,, Hilti (2022). HVU-TZ M10-M20: Sicherheitsdatenblatt.

HERO ID:	11437783

Conditions of Use: Use of adhesives and sealants

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

1-3%
Powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
High
High
Medium

From an OECD country

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2022, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 158 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyclohexyl Phthalate	General Engineering Assessment	HERO ID: 11437783 Table: 2 of 2

Study Citation:	AG,, Hilti (2022). HVU-TZ M10-M20: Sicherheitsdatenblatt.

HERO ID:	11437783

Conditions of Use: Incorporation into adhesives and sealants

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

1-3%
Powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
High
High
Medium

From an OECD country

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2022, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 159 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 11182954 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	AkzoNobel, (2018). Taskforce executive summary for dicyclohexyl phthalate (TF2).

HERO ID:	11182954

Conditions of Use: Manufacturing

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Production, import, or use volume:
Chemical concentration:

400 tons/year produced in Tianjin.

Chemical concentration in manufactured product is 100%.



Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

Medium

Report uses high quality data/techniques/methods that are not from frequently-used
sources and there are no known quality issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Low
High
High
Low

Data are from China, a non-OECD country.

Data are for manufacture, an in-scope occupational scenario.

Report is based on current industry conditions and data no more than 10 years old.

Sample distribution is characterized by no statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented, but underlying data sources
are not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Variability and uncertainty are not addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 160 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 11182955 Table: 1 of 2

Study Citation:	AkzoNobel, (2018). Priority substance program: Environmental risk assessment for dicyclohexyl phthalate, Akzo Nobel Functional Chemicals, Tianjin

production and formulation.

HERO ID:	11182955

Conditions of Use: Processing into formulation

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Chemical concentration:

800 tonnes per year of perkadox CH-50 is formulated of which 50% is DCHP.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

Medium

Report uses high quality data/techniques/methods that are not from frequently-used
sources and there are no known quality issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Low
High
High
Low

Data are from China, a non-OECD country.

Data are for processing into formulation, an in-scope occupational scenario.
Report is based on current industry conditions and data no more than 10 years old.
Sample distribution is characterized by no statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Assessment or report provides results, but the underlying methods, data sources, and
assumptions are not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

The report does not address variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	Low

Page 161 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: i 1182955 Table: 2 of 2

Study Citation:	AkzoNobel, (2018). Priority substance program: Environmental risk assessment for dicyciohexyi phthaiate, Akzo Nobel Functional Chemicals, Tianjin

production and formulation.

HERO ID:	11182955

Conditions of Use: Manufacturing

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Production, import, or use volume: "Dicyclohexylphthalate (DCHP) is manufactured and formulated at the Nouryon location in Tianjin. 400 tonnes of DCHP is produced in Tianjin." PDF Pg. 1

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

Medium Report uses high quality data/techniques/methods that are not from frequently-used
sources and there are no known quality issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Low	Data are from China, a non-OECD country.

High	Data are for manufacture, an in-scope occupational scenario.

High	Report is based on current industry conditions and data no more than 10 years old.

Low	Sample distribution is characterized by no statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6: Metadata Completeness

Low Assessment or report provides results, but the underlying methods, data sources, and
assumptions are not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

Low The report does not address variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination

Low

Page 162 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303148 Table: 1 of 2

Study Citation:	American Hydrotech Inc (2016). HydroSeal® catalyst.

HERO ID:	6303148

Conditions of Use: Use of paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

25-50%
Powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
Medium
Medium

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
More than 10 but less than 20 years old
Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 163 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 6303 m Table: 2 of 2

Study Citation:	American Hydrotech Inc (2016). HydroSeal® catalyst.

HERO ID:	6303148

Conditions of Use: Incorporation into paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

25-50%
Powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
Medium
Medium

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
More than 10 but less than 20 years old
Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 164 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 11360400 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:

APR, (2020). U.S. post-consumer plastic recycling data.

HERO ID:

11360400

Conditions of Use:

Recycling



EXTRACTION

Parameter

Data

Production, import, or use volume: "In 2020, a minimum of 4,803.8 million pounds of post-consumer plastic material sources in the U.S. was recovered for recycling in the categories of Bottles (by

resin), Non-bottle Rigids, Film, and Other Plastics (excluding foam)."

Life cycle description:	% of total recovered for recycling: All bottles: 57.1%PET Bottles: 36.8%HDPE Bottles: 19.6% PP & Other Bottles: 0.7%Non-bottle Rigids: 22.0%Film:

20.5%Other Plastics: 0.3%

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods that
are from frequently used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:

Geographic Scope

High

The data are from the United States and are representative of the industry being evalu-
ated.

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.

The report is generally no more than 10 years old.

Distribution of samples is qualitative or characterized by no statistics.

Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
Low

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

Assessment or report clearly documents its data sources, assessment methods, results,
and assumptions.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by describing amounts of recycled products for several categories
but uncertainty is not addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 165 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyclohexyl Phthalate	General Engineering Assessment	HERO ID: 2816857 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Bao, J., Wang, M., Ning, X., Zhou, Y., He, Y., Yang, J., Gao, X., Li, S., Ding, Z., Chen, B. (2015). Phthalate concentrations in personal care products and

the cumulative exposure to female adults and infants in Shanghai. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A: Current Issues 78(5):325-341.
HERO ID:	2816857

Conditions of Use: Use of Personal care products

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Process description:

Throughput:

Chemical concentration:

PE are added to PCP as emollients, skin permeability enhancers, and stabilizers for color or fragrance (Parlett et al., 2013).

Use rates and application frequency of personal care products in Table 1

Concentration in personal care products compiled in Table 3: ranges from 0 to 140 mg/kg

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods
that are from frequently used sources (e.g., European Union or OECD reports, NIOSH
HHEs, journal articles, Kirk-Othmer) and are generally accepted by the scientific com-
munity, and associated information does not indicate flaws or quality issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:

Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Low

Uninformative
High
Medium

The data are from a non-OECD country, and locality-specific factors (e.g., potentially
greater differences in regulatory occupational exposure or emission limits, industry/pro-
cess technologies) may impact exposures or releases relative to the U.S., or the country
of origin is not specified.

The report is from an occupational or non-occupationalscenario that does not apply to
any occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.

The report captures operations, equipment, and worker activities expected to be repre-
sentative of current conditions. The report is generally no more than 10 years old.
Distribution of samples is characterized by a range with uncertain statistics. It is unclear
if analysis is representative.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

Assessment or report clearly documents its data sources, assessment methods, results,
and assumptions.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

High

The report addresses variability and uncertainty in the results. Uncertainty is well char-
acterized.

Overall Quality Determination

Uninformative





Page 166 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303144 Table: 1 of 2

Study Citation:	BEIL (2019). Harterpulver 50.

HERO ID:	6303144

Conditions of Use: Use of paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

40-50%

Solid powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
High
High
Medium

From an OECD country

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2019,which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 167 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 6303144 Table: 2 of 2

Study Citation:	BEIL (2019). Harterpulver 50.

HERO ID:	6303144

Conditions of Use: Incorporation into paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

40-50%

Solid powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
High
High
Medium

From an OECD country

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2019,which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 168 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303138 Table: 1 of 2

Study Citation:	Belgium, Beads (2016). EchoStar 30 BCP tecno.

HERO ID:	6303138

Conditions of Use: Use of paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

0.56 - 0.77 %
Solid





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
High
High
Medium

From an OECD country

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2016, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 169 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 6303138 Table: 2 of 2

Study Citation:	Belgium, Beads (2016). EchoStar 30 BCP tecno.

HERO ID:	6303138

Conditions of Use: Incorporation into paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

0.56 - 0.77 %
Solid





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
High
High
Medium

From an OECD country

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2016, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 170 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303137 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Buehler (2017). VariDur 200 powder.

HERO ID:	6303137

Conditions of Use: Laboratory chemical

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

0-1%
Powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Medium

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2017, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 171 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303142 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Buehler (2018). VariDur 3003 powder.

HERO ID:	6303142

Conditions of Use: Laboratory chemical

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

0 - 2.5%
powder(s)





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
High
High
Medium

From an OECD country

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2018, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 172 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 1267867 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:

Burgess, W. A. (1991). Potential exposures in the manufacturing industry—Their recognition and control. :595-674.

HERO ID:

1267867

Conditions of Use:

Painting



EXTRACTION

Parameter

Data

Process description:	Painting: Paints can be applied to parts by a myriad of processes including brush, roller, dip, flow, curtain, tumbling, spray, and powder coating. Spray painting by

air atomization is the most common application method encountered in industry and presents the principal hazards. To a large degree the hazard in a given spray
paint operation depends on the transfer efficiency of the paint application method. Transfer efficiency denotes the percentage of the paint that is deposited on the
workpiece; the balance is lost by overspray and rebound. During painting using air atomization, the paint is conveyed from a paint reservoir by either siphon pick
up created by the airflow, or in the case of heavy, viscous or high solids paints, the reservoir is pressurized and the paint flows to the spray gun. Low Pressure-Low
Volume system utilizes a special air-atomizing gun with low pressure air jets impinging on a primary stream of paint to provide the atomization mechanism. The
high volume-low pressure system uses compressed air at 3-6 psig and air flows of approximately 20 cfm to atomize the paint. The electrostatic system places a
negative charge on the paint particle by passing the paint mist through a corona discharge field. In the Powder Coating Application Methods, he fluidized powder
is conveyed through a corona discharge (60-100KV) where the powder particles pick up a negative charge; they are then directed by the electrostatic field to the
grounded workpiece and deposit as a uniform coating. Rubber products: In the compounding process, the natural or synthetic rubber is received at the workstation
in bale form and is cut into weighable pieces with a guillotine cutter. The various rubber chemicals specified in the formula are then weighed out for a specific
batch size. This operation involves opening bagged and barreled material and placing it in hoppers for weighing. Since most of the compounds are in powder or
granular form this usually is a dusty operation, and weigh stations must be exhausted. Where possible, small quantities of chemicals should be prepackaged in
plastic bags that can be placed directly in the batch, thereby eliminating a dust exposure in emptying bag contents. The chemical additives are weighed out in
plastic bags and placed on the charging conveyor with the rubber. An automatic weigh system delivers a given amount of carbon black directly to the mixer from
either a remote silo, a rigid container located near the Banbury, or a flexible bulk container. Such automatic, closed-pipe delivery systems have a major impact in
reducing the exposure of workers to carbon black. Only the very small job shop will now manually dump bags of carbon black into the mixer with its resulting
dust exposure. The carbon black, preweighed rubber, and additives on the conveyor are then charged to the Banbury, the charge door closes, and the mass falls
into the mixer chamber where it is homogenized to ensure uniform dispersion of all ingredients. This system requires a large powerful motor drive, reduction
gears and a drive system and as a result the nearby work areas exceed the OSHA PEL of 85 dBA. The rubber processing steps in tire production involve all of the
processes encountered in general rubber manufacturing except molding.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

report uses high quality data

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Low
N/A

The data are from the United States

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Doesn't mention DCHP specifically
Article is from 1991

This metric is not applicable to the data being extracted

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

Assessment or report clearly documents its data sources

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Continued on next page ...

Page 173 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyclohexyl Phthalate	General Engineering Assessment	HERO ID: 1267867 Table: 1 of 1

... continued from previous page

Study Citation:	Burgess, W. A. (1991). Potential exposures in the manufacturing industry—Their recognition and control. :595-674.

HERO ID:	1267867

Conditions of Use: Painting

EVALUATION

Domain	Metric	Rating	Comments

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness	N/A This metric is not applicable to the data being extracted

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 174 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 1322045 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Cao, X. L. (2010). Phthalate esters in foods: Sources, occurrence, and analytical methods. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety

9(l):21-43.

HERO ID:	1322045

Conditions of Use: Plasticizers

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Chemical concentration:	In PVC gaskets, DiNP was detected at 24.5% to 52.1%, DiDP was detected from 0.3% to 40.7%, and DCHP was detected at 0.1% to 10.5%. DBP and DCHP is

present in printing ink formulations from 2-8%

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

Medium

Report uses high quality techniques that are not from frequently-used sources and there
are no known quality issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:

Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
Low

Medium

Medium

Data are from Canada, an OECD country.

Data are for consumer use of plastic products, which is similar to commercial use of
plastic products, an in-scope occupational scenario.

Assessment is based on data greater than 10 years old but no more than 20 years old and
industry conditions that are expected to be representative of current industry conditions.
Sample distribution characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability is addressed by reporting ranges of concentrations. Uncertainty is not ad-
dressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 175 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6311506 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Carboline Company (2019). Thermaline 4900 Safety Data Sheet.

HERO ID:	6311506

Conditions of Use: Use of Paints and Coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Chemical concentration:

l-<2.5%





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Medium

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2023, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination

High





Page 176 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 664488 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:
HERO ID:
Conditions of Use:

CDC, (2009). Fourth national report on human exposure to environmental chemicals.
664488

Manufacturing

Parameter

EXTRACTION

Data

Life cycle description:

Dicyclohexyl phthalate (DCHP) is used to stabilize some rubbers, resins, and polymers, including nitrocellulose, polyvinyl acetate, and polyvinyl chloride.

Domain

EVALUATION

Metric Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1: Methodology	High The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods

that are from frequently used sources (e.g., European Union or OECD reports, NIOSH
HHEs, journal articles, Kirk-Othmer) and are generally accepted by the scientific com-
munity, and associated information does not indicate flaws or quality issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:

Metric 3:
Metric 4:

Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness

Sample Size

High

High
Medium

N/A

The data are from the United States and are representative of the industry being evalu-
ated.

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
The report captures operations, equipment, and worker activities that are expected to be
reasonably representative of current conditions. The report is generally more than 10
years but no more than 20 years old.

Information is qualitative

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Assessment or report clearly documents results, methods, and assumptions. Data
sources are generally described but not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

The report provides only limited discussion of the variability and uncertainty in the
results.

Overall Quality Determination

High





Page 177 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 10442901 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:

CEPE, (2020), SpERC fact sheet: Industrial application of coatings by spraying.

HERO ID:

10442901

Conditions of Use:

Paints and Coatings



EXTRACTION

Parameter

Data

Throughput:	Typical maximum daily usage, for any one substance, based on sector knowledge 1000 kg product/day at any one location. Pigment/extender/filler: 100

kg/dayBinder: 100 kg/dayWater: 350 kg/dayOrganic solvent/coalescent: 450 kg/day Additives: 5 kg/day

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

Medium

Data is from CEPE SpERC 8.3. The report uses high quality data and associated infor-
mation does not indicate flaws or quality issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
Medium

High
Low

The data are from an OECD country other than the U.S.

The release data are for an occupational scenario that is similar to an occupational sce-
nario within the scope of the risk evaluation but data is general and not specific to the
chemical.

Fact sheet is from 2020.

No distribution of samples provided for throughput

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Assessment or report clearly documents results, methods, and assumptions. Data
sources are generally described but not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

The report does not address variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 178 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 10442902 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:
HERO ID:
Conditions of Use:

CEPE, (2020). SpERC fact sheet: Professional application of coatings and inks by spraying.
10442902

Paints and Coatings, Inks, toner and colorant products

Parameter

EXTRACTION

Data

Throughput:

Typical maximum daily usage, for any one substance, based on sector knowledge 100 kg product/day at any one location.Pigment/extender/filler: 10 kg/dayBinder:
10 kg/dayWater: 35 kg/dayOrganic solvent/coalescent: 45 kg/dayAdditives: 0.5 kg/day

Domain

EVALUATION

Metric Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1: Methodology Medium Data is from CEPE SpERC 8.3. The report uses high quality data and associated infor-
mation does not indicate flaws or quality issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2: Geographic Scope	Medium The data are from an OECD country other than the U.S.

Metric 3: Applicability	Medium The release data are for an occupational scenario that is similar to an occupational sce-

nario within the scope of the risk evaluation but data is general and not specific to the
chemical.

Metric 4: Temporal Representativeness	High	Fact sheet is from 2020.

Metric 5: Sample Size	Low	No distribution of samples provided for throughput.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Assessment or report clearly documents results, methods, and assumptions. Data
sources are generally described but not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

The report does not address variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination

Medium





Page 179 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303183 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	CertiPrep,, SPEX (2017). Dicyclohexyl phthalate: Safety data sheet.

HERO ID:	6303183

Conditions of Use: Laboratory chemical

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

0.10%
Liquid





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Low

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2017, which is less than 10 years old.

Single value - no distribution/statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Does not address variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 180 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303123 Table: 1 of 2

Study Citation:	ChemRex (2003). EMACO 2020 PART C.

HERO ID:	6303123

Conditions of Use: Use of paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

45-60%
solid (granules)





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
Low
Medium

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
More than 20 years old

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 181 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 6303123 Table: 2 of 2

Study Citation:	ChemRex (2003). EMACO 2020 PART C.

HERO ID:	6303123

Conditions of Use: Incorporation into paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

45-60%
solid (granules)





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
Low
Medium

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
More than 20 years old

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 182 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 10186827 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:

Cordeiro, C. F., Petrocelli, F. P. (2005). Vinyl acetate polymers.

HERO ID:

10186827

Conditions of Use:

Plasticizer in adhesive manufacturing



EXTRACTION

Parameter

Data

Life cycle description:	Plasticizers are added to emulsion adhesives to modify several properties of both the emulsion and the finished adhesive film. By softening the polymer particles

dispersed in the emulsion and increasing their mobility plasticizers cause them to flow together more easily. This usually increases the viscosity of the emulsion
and tends to destabilize it for faster breaking and setting speeds at the time it is applied. In addition, the increased softness and mobility help the emulsion to
wet smooth, nonporous surfaces, eg, films, foils, and coated papers, thereby increasing its adhesion to them. Also, the softened polymer particles coalesce more
rapidly and at a lower temperature than is possible with the unplasticized emulsion. This improved coalescence increases the water resistance of the adhesive film.
Plasticizers are usually high boiling esters, eg, phthalates.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods that
are from frequently used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:

Geographic Scope

High

The data are from the United States and are representative of the industry being evalu-
ated.

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation, but
information is not chemical specific.

The report is generally more than 10 years but no more than 20 years old.

N/A - Life Cycle Description

Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium

Medium
N/A

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Assessment or report clearly documents results, methods, and assumptions. Data
sources are generally described but not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

N/A

No scope to address variability and uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 183 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 5155508 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:

CPSC, (2015). Exposure assessment: Composition, production, and use of phthalates.

HERO ID:

5155508

Conditions of Use:

Manufacturing



EXTRACTION

Parameter

Data

Production, import, or use volume: PV in the US is 500,000 - 1,000,000 lb/yr in 2015. EPA (2015) reports 3 companies responded to production and use of DCHP manufactured or imported into

the US in 2012. Production volumes from 1986 - 1994 ranged from 1,000,000-10,000,000 lbs/yr and from 1998 - 2011 it was reported to be 500,000 - 1,000,000
lbs/yr.

Process description:	DCHP can be produced from an esterification reaction of phthalic anhydride with cyclohexanol in an inert solvent like toluene at approximately 130 C

Number of sites:	3

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Report uses high quality data from frequently used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Medium

Data is from US.

Directly applicable to condition of use.

Reported data is from 2015

Distribution of samples is characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Clearly documents results and sources are generally described.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Addresses variability by citing production volumes over multiple years but does not
address uncertainty

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 184 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 5155520 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:

CPSC, (2011). Toxicity review of dicyclohexyl phthalate (DCHP).

HERO ID:

5155520

Conditions of Use:

Manufacturing



EXTRACTION

Parameter

Data

Production, import, or use volume: Combination production of phthalate increased from 5,000 (1982) to 13,000 (2004) metric tons. Production volumes in HSDB for DCHP indicate production

volume range was 500,000 to 1 million pounds in 2002.

Process description:	DCHP can be manufactured commercially in a closed system by catalytically esterifying phthalic anhydride with cyclohexane ring alcohols (cyclohexanol).

Purified by vacuum distillation or activated charcoal. Purity can achieve 99% or greater. Remaining fraction of DCHP may contain a maximum of 0.1% water
and 0.15% phthalic acid.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Report uses high quality data from frequently used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
Medium
N/A

Data is from US.

Directly applicable to conditions of use.

Data is from more than 10 years but no more than 20 years ago.

No sample data.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Clearly documents results and sources are generally described.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

N/A

Process description and PV data. No scope to address variability and uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 185 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303170 Table: 1 of 2

Study Citation:	Devcon/Versachem, I.C. (2008). Duco cement material safety data sheet.

HERO ID:	6303170

Conditions of Use: Use of adhesives

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

<5%
Liquid





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Medium

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2019, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Does not address variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 186 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 6303170 Table: 2 of 2

Study Citation:	Devcon/Versachem, I.C. (2008). Duco cement material safety data sheet.

HERO ID:	6303170

Conditions of Use: Incorporation into formulation

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

<5%
Liquid





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Medium

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2019, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Does not address variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 187 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 5353181 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation: EC/HC, (2017). Draft screening assessment: Phthaiate substance grouping.
HERO ID: 5353181
Conditions of Use: Manufacturing

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Production, import, or use volume:

Total import for DCHP in Canada in 2012 <10,000 kg



Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Report uses high quality data from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
Medium

High
Medium

Data are from Canada, an OECD country.

Data are for manufacturing, an in-scope occupational scenario, but the information is not
for U.S (for Canada).

Assessment is based on current industry conditions and data no more than 10 years old.
Sample distribution characterized by limited statistics (ranges) but discrete samples not
provided and distribution not fully characterized.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Uncertainty is addressed below the reporting table but variability is not addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 188 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303131 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Electron Microscopy Sciences (2016). JB-4 CATALYST.

HERO ID:	6303131

Conditions of Use: Laboratory chemical

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

>25-<50%
Granulate





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Medium

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2022, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 189 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303134 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Electron Microscopy Sciences (2019). TECHNOVIT 3040 POWDER.

HERO ID:	6303134

Conditions of Use: Laboratory chemicals

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

>2.5-<10%
Powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Medium

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2019, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 190 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303149 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Electron Microscopy Sciences (2018). (2018). MATFIX RESIN.

HERO ID:	6303149

Conditions of Use: Laboratory chemical

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

<2.5%
Powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Medium

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2018, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 191 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 11360395 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	ENF, (2024). Plastic recycling plants in the United States.

HERO ID:	11360395

Conditions of Use: Recycling

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Number of sites:	59 plants in the U.S. recycle plastics into various forms, including granules/pellets and flakes. The document lists all plants along with hyperlinks to their address

and other metadata.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Report uses high quality data from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
N/A

Data are from the U.S.

Data are for recycling, an in-scope occupational scenario.

Report is based on current industry conditions and data no more than 10 years old.
N/A - number of sites.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

N/A

N/A - number of sites.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 192 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 7349020 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	ERG, (1998). Air emissions inventories, volume 2: Point sources: Chapter 11: Preferred and alternative methods for estimating air emissions from plastic

products manufacturing.

HERO ID:	7349020

Conditions of Use: Plastics Product Manufacturing

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Production, import, or use volume: 1995 volume (in millions of pounds) of plastic types is provided in Table 11.2-1: 25,097 mil lbs of polyethylene, 10,890 mil lbs of polypropylene, 5,656 mil lbs of

polystyrene, 12,295 mil lbs of PVC, 3,785 mil lbs of saturated polyester, 632 mil lbs of epoxy, 3,204 mil lbs of phenolic, 4,269 mil lbas of polyurethanes, 1,577
mil lbs of unsaturated polyester, and 1,816 mil lbs of urea-formaldehyde.

Process description:	Plastic products manufacturing involves molding, forming, shaping, or otherwise altering plastic resins or plastic materials to produce an intermediate or final

product. Solid and foamed plastic products are manufactured using plastic resins or solid plastic chips as the starting material. Most plastic products are
manufactured by mixing plastic resins with additives, applying heat or pressure to the mixture, and shaping the mixture to form the desired product. (Section 2.1).
II Section 2.1.1 describes the different types of plastics used by plastic products manufacturing facilities in the United States. II Solid and foamed plastic products
are manufactured by a variety of methods. The choice of manufacturing techniques used to process a plastic product depends largely on whether the resin is a
thermoplastic or thermoset, and the dimensions, shape, or physical qualities of the desired product. This section describes the major manufacturing techniques
used to fabricate intermediate and final plastic products. Extrusion is the most widely used processing technique, followed by injection molding, blow molding,
and foam processing (Midwest Research Institute, 1993). These four manufacturing techniques, in addition to lamination, coating, and finishing operations, are
described below (Section 2.1.2). II Plasticizers are added to plastic materials to improve flexibility, workability, or extrudability. Most plasticizers are used in the
manufacture of flexible polyvinyl chloride (PVC). Phthalates, adipates, and trimellitates are the most common plasticizers. (Section 2.1.3)

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods
that are from frequently used sources (e.g., European Union or OECD reports, NIOSH
HHEs, journal articles, Kirk-Othmer) and are generally accepted by the scientific com-
munity, and associated information does not indicate flaws or quality issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:

Geographic Scope

High

The data are from the United States and are representative of the industry being evalu-
ated.

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation; how-
ever, information is general and not chemical-specific.

The report is from 1998, which is more than 20 years old.

Volumes are provided as discrete values, but the statistical representativeness and num-
ber of samples is unknown.

Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium

Low
Medium

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

Assessment or report clearly documents its data sources, assessment methods, results,
and assumptions.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Continued on next page ...

Page 193 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 7349020 Table: 1 of 1

... continued from previous page

Study Citation:

HERO ID:
Conditions of Use:

ERG, (1998). Air emissions inventories, volume 2: Point sources: Chapter 11: Preferred and alternative methods for estimating air emissions from plastic

products manufacturing.

7349020

Plastics Product Manufacturing

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments



Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

High The report addresses variability and uncertainty in the results. Uncertainty is well char-
acterized.

Overall Quality Determination

High



Page 194 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303145 Table: 1 of 2

Study Citation:	Evonik Corporation USA (2012). Protectosil degadeck CSS BPO.

HERO ID:	6303145

Conditions of Use: Use of adhesives and sealants

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

40 - 55 %
Powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
Medium
Medium

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
More than 10 but less than 20 years old
Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 195 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 6303145 Table: 2 of 2

Study Citation:	Evonik Corporation USA (2012). Protectosil degadeck CSS BPO.

HERO ID:	6303145

Conditions of Use: Incorporation into adhesives and sealants

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

40 - 55 %
Powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
Medium
Medium

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
More than 10 but less than 20 years old
Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 196 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303132 Table: 1 of 2

Study Citation:	Ford Motor Company, (2015). Metal bonding adhesive.

HERO ID:	6303132

Conditions of Use: Use of adhesives and sealants

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

3 - <5%
Liquid





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Medium

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2015, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 197 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 6303132 Table: 2 of 2

Study Citation:	Ford Motor Company, (2015). Metal bonding adhesive.

HERO ID:	6303132

Conditions of Use: Incorporation into adhesives and sealants

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

3 - <5%
Liquid





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Medium

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2015, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 198 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyclohexyl Phthalate	General Engineering Assessment	HERO ID: 8338316 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Giuliani, A., Zuccarini, M., Cichelli, A., Khan, H., Reale, M. (2020). Critical Review on the Presence of Phthalates in Food and Evidence of Their

Biological Impact. International lournal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(16): 1-43.

HERO ID:	8338316

Conditions of Use: Manufacture

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Process description:
Chemical concentration:

They are manufactured by a reaction of phthalic anydride with various alcohols starting from methanol and ethanol for the smaller compounds, up to iso-decanol
straight chain or with somebranching [20], At room temperature, they are almost colorless, odorless oily liquids and are increasingly fat soluble (lipophilic)
depending on how long their chain is.

No concentration data for DCHP. However, many concentration data provided for other phthalates.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Peer reviewed and published journal article.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:

Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
High
High

N/A

Data from a OECD country, Italy.

The data are for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
The operations, equipment, and worker activities associated with the data are expected
to be representative of current operations, equipment, and activities. The data are no
more than 10 years old.

Process description.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

Assessment or report clearly documents its data sources, assessment methods, results,
and assumptions.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

N/A

N/A- process description

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 199 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303160 Table: 1 of 2

Study Citation:	GmbH, H.B. (2015). X60 - A.

HERO ID:	6303160

Conditions of Use: Use of paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

<2.5%
Powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium

High
Medium
Medium

From an OECD country

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
More than 10 but less than 20 years old
Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 200 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 6303160 Table: 2 of 2

Study Citation:	GmbH, H.B. (2015). X60 - A.

HERO ID:	6303160

Conditions of Use: Incorporation into paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

<2.5%
Powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium

High
Medium
Medium

From an OECD country

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
More than 10 but less than 20 years old
Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 201 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303139 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	GmbH, Kulzer (2017). Technovit 4000 powder.

HERO ID:	6303139

Conditions of Use: Laboratory chemical

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

>2.5-<10%
Powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Medium

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2022, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 202 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303146 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	GmbH, Kulzer (2017). Technovit 7100 hardener 1.

HERO ID:	6303146

Conditions of Use: Use of laboratory chemicals

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Comments:

25-50%

concentration of chemical in Technovit 7100 Hardener 1 from Manufacturer SDS

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Manufacturer SDS

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
High
High
Low

The data are from an OECD country other than the U.S.

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.

Manufacturer SDS from 2016 (most recent version)

Distribution of samples is qualitative or characterized by no statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Assessment or report provides results, but the underlying methods, data sources, and
assumptions are not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability is addressed but uncertainty is not addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 203 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303153 Table: 1 of 2

Study Citation:	GmbH, L.B. (2015). HistoResin M.M.Pulver.

HERO ID:	6303153

Conditions of Use: PVC Plastic Converting

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

0-5%
Powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
High
High
Medium

Product is from an OECD country.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2015, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 204 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 6303153 Table: 2 of 2

Study Citation:	GmbH, L.B. (2015). HistoResin M.M.Pulver.

HERO ID:	6303153

Conditions of Use: PVC Plastic Compounding

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

0-5%
Powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
High
High
Medium

Product is from an OECD country.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2015, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 205 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303151 Table: 1 of 2

Study Citation:	GmbH, PERGAN (2018). PEROXAN BP-Pulver 30 W.

HERO ID:	6303151

Conditions of Use: Use of paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

25-30%
Powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
High
High
Medium

From an OECD country

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2018, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 206 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 6303151 Table: 2 of 2

Study Citation:	GmbH, PERGAN (2018). PEROXAN BP-Pulver 30 W.

HERO ID:	6303151

Conditions of Use: Incorporation into paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

25-30%
Powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
High
High
Medium

From an OECD country

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2018, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 207 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303197 Table: 1 of 2

Study Citation:	GmbH, U.I. (2018). BP-30-FT1.

HERO ID:	6303197

Conditions of Use: Use of paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

>= 45 - < 50%
Powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
High
High
Medium

From an OECD country

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2023, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 208 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 6303197 Table: 2 of 2

Study Citation:	GmbH, U.I. (2018). BP-30-FT1.

HERO ID:	6303197

Conditions of Use: Incorporation into formulation

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

>= 45 - < 50%
Powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
High
High
Medium

From an OECD country

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2023, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 209 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyclohexyl Phthalate	General Engineering Assessment	HERO ID: 1987638 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Guo, Y., Wang, L., Kannan, K. (2014). Phthalates and parabens in personal care products from China: Concentrations and human exposure. Archives of

Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 66(1): 113-119.

HERO ID:	1987638

Conditions of Use: commercial use

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Production, import, or use volume:
Chemical concentration:

In 2010, the global production of phthalates was estimated at 4.9 million tons, which accounts for 84 % of the total plasticizer production.
DCHP was not detected in the personal care products tested for this study.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

report uses high quality data

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Low
Low

High
Low

The data are from a non-OECD country

The report is for a non-occupational scenario that is similar to an occupational scenario

within the scope of the risk evaluation

The report is generally no more than 10 years old.

characterized by no statistics

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

report clearly documents its data sources

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

The report does not address variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 210 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 4168432 Table: 1 of 2

Study Citation:	Hahladakis, J. N., Velis, C. A., Weber, R., Iacovidou, E., Purnell, P. (2018). An overview of chemical additives present in plastics: Migration, release, fate

and environmental impact during their use, disposal and recycling, lournal of Hazardous Materials 344:179-199.

HERO ID:	4168432

Conditions of Use: Disposal of plastics

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Life cycle description:	See graphical abstract and Fig 1: Plasticizers and other additives are added at plastics processing and manufacturing sites -> plastic products used -> plastic

products disposed of -> plastic waste collection -> sent to landfill, open burning, energy from waste, or material recovery facilities -> from material recovery
facilities, material is reprocessed through mechanical/ chemical means -> sent back to plastics processing and manufacturing sites for integration into plastic
articles

Process description:	Large volumes of plastic wastes are generated, mainly due to the short lifespan of many plastic products (it is estimated that approximately 40% of plastic

products have a service life of less than 1 month). In Europe, which arguably with Japan has the most technically advanced and environmentally conscious waste
and resource recovery systems deployed on the ground, approximately 50% of plastic waste is still directed to controlled landfill disposal [2], Resource recovery
alternatives to landfill are mechanical recycling (primary recycling substituting virgin materials and secondary recycling), chemical recovery (tertiary recycling)
or energy recovery (quaternary recycling) [9,10], In industrial countries a large share of plastic waste is used for energy recovery. In Europe, more plastics waste
is destined for energy recovery (39.5%) (in EfW or via solid recovered fuels (SRF) recovered in cement kilns) than for recycling (29.7%) [27], Primary recycling
substituting virgin polymers in the same application is possible for some plastic types and fractions (e.g. for PET plastic bottles or car bumpers) [10], Moulding
and extrusion are key stages in the mechanical material recycling process of plastic waste that usually is operated at 200-300°C. However, among else, the great
variability in plastics polymers and post-use contamination obstructs closed-loop recycling or makes it difficult [10,11], For the vast majority of plastic waste
fractions (e.g. most packaging, plastic from electronics, plastic and polymers from the transport and construction sectors) labour or technology intensive sorting is
needed in order to get a high quality recyelate which can be used for substituting virgin materials [12], Often, plastics are in most cases secondary recycling applies,
in which used plastics are cascaded into material applications different than the original, and often of less demanding material specifications (e.g. PET bottles into
fleece). Plastic waste for recycling could be transported overlong distances, for instance exported from the Global North to the developing countries, particularly
to Asia [13], It was shown that 46% wt. of the plastics collected for recycling in Europe were eventually exported, with 90% wt. of it directly or indirectly ending
up in China [14,15], Chemical recovery (tertiary recycling), involves chemicals, e.g., raw materials such as monomers, being recovered and/or con-verted from the
plastic material [9]. This can potentially be done by catalytic depolymerisation or by controlled thermal degradation, such as thermolysis, which is a non-catalytic
cracking process[16], Pyrolysis is also considered to be a sustainable and efficient treatment that can produce a range of useful hydrocarbons, potentially used as
a chemical feedstock or as energy, thereby minimizing the dependency on non-renewable fossil fuels, while solving the landfilling problem [17,18],

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods

that are from frequently used sources (e.g., European Union or OECD reports, NIOSH
HHEs, journal articles, Kirk-Othmer) and are generally accepted by the scientific com-
munity, and associated information does not indicate flaws or quality issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2: Geographic Scope

Metric 3: Applicability

Metric 4: Temporal Representativeness

Medium The data are from an OECD country other than the U.S., and locality-specific factors

(e.g., potential differences in regulatory occupational exposure or emission limits, indus-
try/ process technologies) may impact exposures or releases relative to the U.S.

Medium The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation, but
data is general and not specific to DCHP.

High The report captures operations, equipment, and worker activities expected to be repre-
sentative of current conditions. The report is generally no more than 10 years old.

Continued on next page ...

Page 211 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 4168432 Table: 1 of 2

... continued from previous page

Study Citation:

HERO ID:
Conditions of Use:

Hahladakis, J. N., Velis, C. A., Weber, R., Iacovidou, E., Purnell, P. (2018). An overview of chemical additives present in plastics: Migration, release, fate

and environmental impact during their use, disposal and recycling. Journal of Hazardous Materials 344:179-199.

4168432

Disposal of plastics

Domain



Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments



Metric 5:

Sample Size

N/A

No sample data.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

Assessment or report clearly documents its data sources, assessment methods, results,
and assumptions.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

N/A

Process description.

Overall Quality Determination

High





Page 212 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 4168432 Table: 2 of 2

Study Citation:	Hahladakis, J. N., Velis, C. A., Weber, R., Iacovidou, E., Purnell, P. (2018). An overview of chemical additives present in plastics: Migration, release, fate

and environmental impact during their use, disposal and recycling. Journal of Hazardous Materials 344:179-199.

HERO ID:	4168432

Conditions of Use: Processing: Production of plastics

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Production, import, or use volume: During the last 15 years, the global annual production of plastics has doubled, reaching approximately 299 million tonnes in 2013 [1,2], Global plastic demand

is dominated by thermoplastic types of polypropylene(PP) (21%), low -and linear low- density polyethylene (LDPE and LLDPE) (18%), polyvinyl chloride
(PVC) (17%), and high-density polyethylene, (HDPE) (15%). Other plastic types with high demand are polystyrene (PS), and expandable PS (8%), polyethylene
terephthalate (PET) (7%, excluding PET fibre) and the thermosetting plastic polyurethane [3],

Life cycle description:	Plastic polymers are not only used for consumer products but also to make synthetic fibres, foams, coatings, adhesives and sealants, which are used in numerous

applications [4], In Europe, the use of plastics is mostly dominated by packaging (38%),followed by building and construction (21%), automotive (7%), electrical
and electronic (6%), and other sectors (28%), such as medical and leisure [2], // About 80% of plasticizers are used in PVC with the remaining 20% used in
cellulose plastic.

Chemical concentration:	Plasticizers are typically 10-70 wt% in plastics

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods
that are from frequently used sources (e.g., European Union or OECD reports, NIOSH
HHEs, journal articles, Kirk-Othmer) and are generally accepted by the scientific com-
munity, and associated information does not indicate flaws or quality issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:

Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium

Medium
High
N/A

The data are from an OECD country other than the U.S., and locality-specific factors
(e.g., potential differences in regulatory occupational exposure or emission limits, indus-
try/ process technologies) may impact exposures or releases relative to the U.S.
The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation, but
data is not specific to DCHP.

The report captures operations, equipment, and worker activities expected to be repre-
sentative of current conditions. The report is generally no more than 10 years old.
No sample data.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

Assessment or report clearly documents its data sources, assessment methods, results,
and assumptions.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

N/A

No scope to address variability and uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination

High





Page 213 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6558535 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Heitbrink, W. (1993). In-depth survey report: Control technology for autobody repair and painting shops at Team Chevrolet, Colorado Springs, Colorado.

HERO ID:	6558535

Conditions of Use: Commercial use - spray painting

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Process description:
Comments:

Autobody shop is located in a two-story building. Before the cars are painted, structural damage to the cars is repaired on the upper level of the shop which is
illustrated in the article. This involves the repair and replacement of damaged parts. Workers may be exposed to aerosols from sanding, grinding, and welding.
Shop does some restoration of automobiles. After structural damage repair, they are prepared for painting. This involves sanding, washing, and covering parts of
the vehicle that are not being painted with either paper or plastic. After the car has been painted, defects in the paint job are removed by buffing. In the upper level
of the shop, vehicle preparation is done next to the spray painting booth. Lower level is illustrated in the article. Spray painting booths in the upper level were
Trimatic cross draft spray painting booths. Air is supplied and exhausted through filters that are mounted in plenums (described in article). Filters are changed
every four to five weeks. Before some painting jobs, the filters are wetted down with water which likely reduces air flow until the filters dry off.

Sampling data but none for DCHP or any phthalates.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods that
are from frequently used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:

Geographic Scope

High

The data are from the United States and are representative of the industry being evalu-
ated.

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation, but
data is general and not specific to DCHP.

The report is more than 20 years old.

No sample data.

Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium

Low
N/A

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Assessment or report clearly documents results, methods, and assumptions. Data
sources are generally described but not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

N/A

Process description.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 214 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6558536 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Heitbrink, W., Cooper, T., Edmonds, M., Bryant, C., Ruch, W. (1993). In-depth survey report: control technology for autobody repair and painting shops

at Valley Paint and Body Shop, Amelia, Ohio.

HERO ID:	6558536

Conditions of Use: Commercial use - Paint and Coatings

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Process description:	Autobody shop. Before the cars are painted, structural damage to the cars is repaired elsewhere in the shop. This involves the repair and replacement of damaged

parts. During these activities, the workers may be exposed to aerosols from sanding, grinding, and welding. For some jobs, abrasive blasting with sand that
contains crystalline silica is used for paint removal. This abrasive blasting was conducted in the open. After the cars have been repaired, they are brought to the
paint shop that is shown in the article. There is some sanding of areas to be painted. Parts of the car which are not to be painted are protected with masking. The
car and autobody parts are painted in either the spray painting booth or in the vehicle preparation station. Generally, the vehicle preparation station is used only for
small paint jobs or for primer painting. Both the vehicle preparation station and the spray painting booth were manufactured by Garmat Inc. Vehicle prep station
shown in article has two bays. Bays are separated by moveable cloth curtains that were suspended from rods in the ceiling. Each bay exhausts air through 3 filters
in the back of the vehicle preparation station. Spray painting booths have 2 painting cycles. During the painting cycle, outside air is passed through a series of
filters. The final set of filters cover the entire ceiling of the spray painting booth. A nominal 12,000 cfm of air flows out of the ceiling around the car or object
being painted and out of the booth through exhaust grates located in the floor of the booth. Booth is 23 ft long, 13 ft wide and 9 ft high. Air is exhausted through a
2 ft wide, rectangular slot in the floor that is 17 ft by 6 ft. After the car or body part has been painted, the worker leaves the booth and the paint is cured at a temp
between 120 and 140 F. During this period, the airflow in the booth is reduced and about 80 percent of the air flow in the booth is recycled.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The document is a survey conducted by NIOSH.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:

Geographic Scope

High

The data are from the United States and are representative of the industry being evalu-
ated.

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation but data
is general and not specific to DCHP.

The report is more than 20 years old.

No sample data.

Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium

Low
N/A

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Assessment or report clearly documents results, methods, and assumptions. Data
sources are generally described but not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

N/A

Process description.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 215 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303167 Table: 1 of 2

Study Citation:	Henry Company (2018). PUMADEQ catalyst.

HERO ID:	6303167

Conditions of Use: Use of paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

30-60%

Solid powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Medium

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2018, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 216 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 6303\6i Table: 2 of 2

Study Citation:	Henry Company (2018). PUMADEQ catalyst.

HERO ID:	6303167

Conditions of Use: Incorporation into paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

30-60%

Solid powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Medium

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2018, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 217 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303171 Table: 1 of 2

Study Citation:	Hilti (Canada) Corp (2015). HVU M8 - M39.

HERO ID:	6303171

Conditions of Use: Use of adhesives and sealants

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

1-2.5%
Solid





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
High
High
Medium

From an OECD country

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2019, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 218 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 6303171 Table: 2 of 2

Study Citation:	Hilti (Canada) Corp (2015). HVU M8 - M39.

HERO ID:	6303171

Conditions of Use: Incorporation into adhesives and sealants

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

1-2.5%
Solid





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
High
High
Medium

From an OECD country

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2019, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 219 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303125 Table: 1 of 2

Study Citation:	Inc, Dudick (2015). MH-1 hardener.

HERO ID:	6303125

Conditions of Use: Use of paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

40% to 60%

Powdered crystalline solid





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Medium

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2015, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 220 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 6303125 Table: 2 of 2

Study Citation:	Inc, Dudick (2015). MH-1 hardener.

HERO ID:	6303125

Conditions of Use: Incorporation into paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

40% to 60%

Powdered crystalline solid





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Medium

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2015, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 221 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303128 Table: 1 of 2

Study Citation:	Inc, Duro-Last (2019). Duro-Last® liquid-applied flashing catalyst.

HERO ID:	6303128

Conditions of Use: Use of paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

49.00 - 51.00%
solid (granules)





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Medium

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2019, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 222 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 6303128 Table: 2 of 2

Study Citation:	Inc, Duro-Last (2019). Duro-Last® liquid-applied flashing catalyst.

HERO ID:	6303128

Conditions of Use: Incorporation into paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

49.00 - 51.00%
solid (granules)





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Medium

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2019, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 223 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303152 Table: 1 of 2

Study Citation:	Inc, P.F. (2011). Chem-Stud adhesive anchor capsules.

HERO ID:	6303152

Conditions of Use: Use of adhesives and sealants

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

not established

Part A: Mild-smelling amber liquid containing quartz sand in larger vial.Part B: Mild-smelling white paste in inner vial.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
Medium
Low

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
More than 10 but less than 20 years old
SDS states concentration not established

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

SDS states concentration not established

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Does not address variability or uncertainty. SDS states concentration not established.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 224 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 6303152 Table: 2 of 2

Study Citation:	Inc, P.F. (2011). Chem-Stud adhesive anchor capsules.

HERO ID:	6303152

Conditions of Use: Incorporation into adhesives and sealants

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

not established

Part A: Mild-smelling amber liquid containing quartz sand in larger vial.Part B: Mild-smelling white paste in inner vial.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
Medium
Low

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
More than 10 but less than 20 years old
SDS states concentration not established

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

SDS states concentration not established

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Does not address variability or uncertainty. SDS states concentration not established.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 225 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303156 Table: 1 of 2

Study Citation:	Inc, P.F. (2011). Hammer-CapsuleTM adhesive anchor capsule.

HERO ID:	6303156

Conditions of Use: Use of adhesives and sealants

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

1 - 2.5%

Liquid in capsule





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Low

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2020, which is less than 10 years old.

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 226 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 6303156 Table: 2 of 2

Study Citation:	Inc, P.F. (2011). Hammer-CapsuleTM adhesive anchor capsule.

HERO ID:	6303156

Conditions of Use: Incorporation into adhesives and sealants

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

1 - 2.5%

Liquid in capsule





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Low

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2020, which is less than 10 years old.

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 227 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303190 Table: 1 of 2

Study Citation:	Inc, Siplast (2015). Pro catalyst.

HERO ID:	6303190

Conditions of Use: Incorporation into paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

>=50 - <55%
Powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Medium

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2018, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 228 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 6303190 Table: 2 of 2

Study Citation:	Inc, Siplast (2015). Pro catalyst.

HERO ID:	6303190

Conditions of Use: Use of paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

>=50 - <55%
Powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Medium

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2018, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 229 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303173 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Inc, T.P. (2017). JB-4® plus catalyst: component of 18040 JB-4® plus. 2017.

HERO ID:	6303173

Conditions of Use: Laboratory Chemical

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

51-60%

white free flowing granules





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Medium

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2017, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 230 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303189 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Inc, U.I. (2018). BENOX C-50.

HERO ID:	6303189

Conditions of Use: Paints and Coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:

>=50- < 55





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Manufacturer SDS.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:

Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High

High
High
Low

The data are from the United States and are representative of the industry being evalu-
ated.

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.

The report is generally no more than 10 years old.

Distribution of samples is qualitative or characterized by no statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Assessment or report provides results, but the underlying methods, data sources, and
assumptions are not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability is addressed but uncertainty is not addressed.

Overall Quality Determination

Medium





Page 231 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303195 Table: 1 of 2

Study Citation:	KG, W.G. (2018). RK-1300 - RK-1500 Activator.

HERO ID:	6303195

Conditions of Use: Use of paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

>10 - <30%
Liquid





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
High
High
Medium

From an OECD country

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2020, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 232 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 6303195 Table: 2 of 2

Study Citation:	KG, W.G. (2018). RK-1300 - RK-1500 Activator.

HERO ID:	6303195

Conditions of Use: Incorporation into paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

>10 - <30%
Liquid





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
High
High
Medium

From an OECD country

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2020, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 233 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 7978846 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:

Lerner, I. (2005). European plastics industry moves from 2-EH, DEHP. Chemical Market Reporter 267(26):26-27.

HERO ID:

7978846

Conditions of Use:

Plasticizers



EXTRACTION

Parameter

Data

Production, import, or use volume: About 70 percent of the plasticizer market volume is phthalates, and plasticizers make up about 60 percent of the plastic additives market. PVC accounts for 80

to 90 percent of global plasticizer consumption. In 2003, global sales of plasticizers were estimated to be roughly $4.9 billion, and the global plastic additives
industry was worth about $14.8 billion, representing nearly 18 billion pounds, (page 1/2)

Comments:	DCHP not mentioned specifically

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

Medium

Assessment uses high quality data that are not from frequently-used sources and there
are no known quality issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:

Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
High

Medium

Medium

Data are global, but EU and US data are the main focus of the article.

Data are for the use of plasticizers in plastic and resin products, an in-scope occupa-
tional scenario.

Report is based on data greater than 10 years old but no more than 20 years old and
industry conditions that are expected to be representative of current industry conditions.
Sample distribution characterized by limited statistics (percentages, production values)
but discrete samples not provided and distribution not fully characterized.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented, but underlying data sources
are not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Variability and uncertainty are not addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 234 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303185 Table: 1 of 2

Study Citation:	Limited, Sika (2017). Sikafloor® pronto hardener.

HERO ID:	6303185

Conditions of Use: Use of paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

>= 40 - < 60%
Powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
High
High
Medium

From an OECD country

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2018, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 235 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 6303185 Table: 2 of 2

Study Citation:	Limited, Sika (2017). Sikafloor® pronto hardener.

HERO ID:	6303185

Conditions of Use: Incorporation into paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

>= 40 - < 60%
Powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
High
High
Medium

From an OECD country

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2018, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 236 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303141 Table: 1 of 2

Study Citation:	LLC, A.G. (2015). ALT catalyst powder.

HERO ID:	6303141

Conditions of Use: Use of paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

25-50%
Powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Medium

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2018, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 237 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 6303141 Table: 2 of 2

Study Citation:	LLC, A.G. (2015). ALT catalyst powder.

HERO ID:	6303141

Conditions of Use: Incorporation into paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

25-50%
Powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Medium

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2018, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 238 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303165 Table: 1 of 2

Study Citation:	LLC, Hydro-Gard (2017). Gard-Deck ® hardener 500.

HERO ID:	6303165

Conditions of Use: Use of paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

40-55%

Solid, free flowing powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Medium

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2017, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 239 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 6303165 Table: 2 of 2

Study Citation:	LLC, Hydro-Gard (2017). Gard-Deck ® hardener 500.

HERO ID:	6303165

Conditions of Use: Incorporation into paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

40-55%

Solid, free flowing powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Medium

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2017, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 240 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303194 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	LLC, Vertellus (2018). MORFLEX® 150 (DICYCLOHEXYL PHTHALATE, DCHP) BY VERTELLUS OFFERS PERFORMANCE, VALUE AND

VERSATILITY ACROSS A BREADTH OF APPLICATIONS.

HERO ID:	6303194

Conditions of Use: Plastic compounding

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

100%
Solid





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Low

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2021, which is less than 10 years old.

Single value - no distribution/statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Does not address variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 241 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303150 Table: 1 of 2

Study Citation:	Lord Corporation, (2017). Fusor 108B, 109B Metal Bonding ADH PT B.

HERO ID:	6303150

Conditions of Use: Incorporation into adhesives and sealants

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

1-5%
Paste





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Medium

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2017, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 242 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 6303150 Table: 2 of 2

Study Citation:	Lord Corporation, (2017). Fusor 108B, 109B Metal Bonding ADH PT B.

HERO ID:	6303150

Conditions of Use: Use of adhesives and sealants

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

1-5%
Paste





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Medium

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2017, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 243 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303129 Table: 1 of 2

Study Citation:	Ltd, D.C. (2019). MONOTEK® hardener powder.

HERO ID:	6303129

Conditions of Use: Use of paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

30 - 60 %
Powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Medium

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2019, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 244 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 6303129 Table: 2 of 2

Study Citation:	Ltd, D.C. (2019). MONOTEK® hardener powder.

HERO ID:	6303129

Conditions of Use: Incorporation into paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

30 - 60 %
Powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Medium

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2019, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 245 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303168 Table: 1 of 2

Study Citation:	Ltd, H.T. (2018). MMA CATALYST.

HERO ID:	6303168

Conditions of Use: Processing - incorporation into paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

47.5-51%
White solid.





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Report uses high quality data from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
High
High
Low

Data are from the United Kingdom, an OECD country.

Data are for an in-scope occupational scenario.

Report is based on current industry conditions and data no more than 10 years old.
No sample size provided for determining chemical concentration.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides physical form and does not document how this was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability is addressed through range of concentration but uncertainty in measurements
is not addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 246 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 6303168 Table: 2 of 2

Study Citation:	Ltd, H.T. (2018). MMA CATALYST.

HERO ID:	6303168

Conditions of Use: Application of paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

47.5-51%
White solid.





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Report uses high quality data from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
High
High
Low

Data are from the United Kingdom, an OECD country.

Data are for an in-scope occupational scenario.

Report is based on current industry conditions and data no more than 10 years old.
No sample size provided for determining chemical concentration.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides physical form and does not document how this was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability is addressed through range of concentration but uncertainty in measurements
is not addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 247 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303178 Table: 1 of 2

Study Citation:	Ltd, T.I. (2018). TREMCO CP510.

HERO ID:	6303178

Conditions of Use: Use of paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

30-<50%
Powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
High
High
Medium

From an OECD country

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2018, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 248 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 6303 m Table: 2 of 2

Study Citation:	Ltd, T.I. (2018). TREMCO CP510.

HERO ID:	6303178

Conditions of Use: Incorporation into paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

30-<50%
Powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
High
High
Medium

From an OECD country

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2018, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 249 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303176 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Ltd, T.S. (2013). Polyethylene protection sheet No. 9430.

HERO ID:	6303176

Conditions of Use: Plastic products

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:

SDS sheet confirms the presence of DCHP in the product but does not give a concentration.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

Medium

SDS information is primary data from the supplier; however, it appears to have quality
issues (missing chemical composition information).

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium

High
Medium
N/A

From an OECD country (Japan).

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
More than 10 but less than 20 years old.

N/A - SDS does not give chemical composition, just confirms presence of chemical.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source does not document how presence of DCHP was confirmed in mixture.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

N/A

N/A - SDS does not give chemical composition, just confirms presence of chemical.

Overall Quality Determination

Medium





Page 250 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 4728432 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Lu, X., Xu, X., Lin, Y., Zhang, Y., Huo, X. (2018). Phthalate exposure as a risk factor for hypertension. Environmental Science and Pollution Research

25(21 ):20550-20561.

HERO ID:	4728432

Conditions of Use: Manufacturing

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Production, import, or use volume: The global annual production of phthalates is estimated to be 11 billion pounds (Sirivarasai et al. 2013).
Life cycle description:	Rubbers, resins, polymers, nitrocellulose, polyvinyl acetate, and PVC

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods
that are from frequently used sources (e.g., European Union or OECD reports, NIOSH
HHEs, journal articles, Kirk-Othmer) and are generally accepted by the scientific com-
munity, and associated information does not indicate flaws or quality issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:

Metric 3:
Metric 4:

Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Low

High
High

N/A

The data are from a non-OECD country, and locality-specific factors (e.g., potentially
greater differences in regulatory occupational exposure or emission limits, industry/ pro-
cess technologies) may impact exposures or releases relative to the U.S., or the country
of origin is not specified.

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
The report captures operations, equipment, and worker activities expected to be repre-
sentative of current conditions. The report is generally no more than 10 years old.
No sample data.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

Assessment or report clearly documents its data sources, assessment methods, results,
and assumptions.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

N/A

lust PV data and lifecycle description. No scope to address variability and uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination

High





Page 251 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303164 Table: 1 of 2

Study Citation:	Manville, Johns (2018). JM PMMA catalyst, SeamFree™ catalyst.

HERO ID:	6303164

Conditions of Use: Incorporation into paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

>=30 - <=60%
Granules





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Medium

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2020, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 252 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 6303164 Table: 2 of 2

Study Citation:	Manville, Johns (2018). JM PMMA catalyst, SeamFree™ catalyst.

HERO ID:	6303164

Conditions of Use: Use of paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

>=30 - <=60%
Granules





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Medium

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2020, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 253 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6826007 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Mersiowsky, N. (2002). Long-term fate of PVC products and their additives in landfills. Progress in Polymer Science 27(10):2227-2277.

HERO ID:	6826007

Conditions of Use: Processing: Plastic Product Manufacturing

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:

Phthalates make up 30% of generic PVC cable and 35% of generic PVC flooring.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods that
are from frequently used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
Medium

Low
N/A

The data are from an OECD country other than the U.S.

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation, but
data is general to phthalates and not specific to DCHP.

The report is more than 20 years old.

No sample data.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

Assessment or report clearly documents its data sources, assessment methods, results,
and assumptions.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed between substances but uncertainty is not addressed.

Overall Quality Determination

Medium





Page 254 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 11360398 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Milbrandt, A., Coney, K., Badgett, A., Beckham, G. T. (2022). Quantification and evaluation of plastic waste in the United States. Resources, Conservation

and Recycling 183:106363.

HERO ID:	11360398

Conditions of Use: Disposal

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Production, import, or use volume:
Life cycle description:

Total Plastic Waste Managed in U.S. in 2019:PET: 5,986 ktHDPE: 7,910 ktPP: 8,189 ktLDPE/LLDPE: 15,139 ktPVC: 699 ktPS/EPS: 3,094 ktOther: 3,115 kt
Percentage of total plastic waste managed by category:PET: 14%HDPE: 18%PP: 19%LDPE/LLDPE: 34%PVC: 2%PS/EPS: 7%Other: 7%

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Report uses high quality data from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

High
High

Data are from the U.S.

Data are for disposal, an in-scope occupational scenario; however, the data are not
chemical specific.

Report is based on current industry conditions and data no more than 10 years old.
Statistical distribution of samples is fully characterized (discrete sampling data pro-
vided).

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by discussing multiple types of plastic products but uncertainty is
not addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 255 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303143 Table: 1 of 2

Study Citation:	Nobel, Akzo (2017). Perkadox CH-50 safety data sheet.

HERO ID:	6303143

Conditions of Use: Use of paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

40 - 55%
Powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
Medium
Medium

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
More than 10 but less than 20 years old
Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 256 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 6303143 Table: 2 of 2

Study Citation:	Nobel, Akzo (2017). Perkadox CH-50 safety data sheet.

HERO ID:	6303143

Conditions of Use: Incorporation into paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

40 - 55%
Powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
Medium
Medium

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
More than 10 but less than 20 years old
Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 257 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303147 Table: 1 of 2

Study Citation:	Nobel, Akzo (2019). Cadox BFF-50 safety data sheet.

HERO ID:	6303147

Conditions of Use: Use of paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

50.00%
white granules





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
Low
Low

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.

More than 20 years old

Single value - no distribution/statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Does not address variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 258 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 6303147 Table: 2 of 2

Study Citation:	Nobel, Akzo (2019). Cadox BFF-50 safety data sheet.

HERO ID:	6303147

Conditions of Use: Incorporation into paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

50.00%
white granules





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
Low
Low

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.

More than 20 years old

Single value - no distribution/statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Does not address variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 259 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 5466433 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Nunez, C., McMinn, B., Vitas, J. (1996). Barriers to the use of radiation-curable adhesives in the coated and laminated substrate manufacturing industry.

Journal of Hazardous Materials 45(l):59-78.

HERO ID:	5466433

Conditions of Use: Processing - Adhesive Manufacturing

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Life cycle description:	Coated and laminated paper and plastic films have a wide variety of uses, including packaging, labelling, adhesive tapes, and decals. The industry spans two

4-digit SIC codes: 2671 (Paper and Plastic Films Coated and Laminated for Packaging), and 2672 (Paper and Plastic Films Coated and Laminated, Not Elsewhere
Classified). Both of these SICs comprise the same industrial processes and consume many of the same materials. The primary differences are in the strict definition
of the end uses of the products manufactured. Facilities within this industry tend to operate in one of two segments: one consists of large facilities operating coating
lines dedicated to one type of product, such as label stock or masking tapes; and the other includes batch processors, or facilities that manufacture small batches
of a wide variety of products (usually with a high value-added component).

Process description:	Both batch processing and dedicated-line facilities employ basically the same process flow. Incoming coating formulation raw materials are blended in mix

tanks or drums with high- or variable-speed dispersers. The dedicated-line facilities typically formulate a coating from resins (e.g., natural or synthetic rubbers),
solvents, and additives. Batch processors often mix purchased blends with performance enhancing additives or use and apply coatings premixed by a supplier.
Only a small percentage of the coatings used by a batch processor is mixed from scratch. After the coatings have been mixed, they are pumped via a manifold
system to the appropriate coating application system. Both industry segments use the same types of application equipment, including direct and reverse roll coaters
and gravure cylinders. While a dedicated-line facility may have a cylinder library consisting of 10 gravure cylinders (one for each coating thickness), the batch
processor might have a library consisting of several hundred gravure cylinders, each one dedicated to a certain coating thickness for a specific customer. Similarly,
a dedicated-line facility limits itself to a single type of substrate (e.g., film) with varying thicknesses, weights, and/or widths. A batch processor uses a variety of
substrates, often including films, papers, foils, and foams. The substrate webs are loaded onto an unwinder. The substrate is guided by idling rolls to a coating
application station where the appropriate coating is applied. Once the coating has been applied, it enters an oven (typically zoned) for drying. The dried substrate
is then ready for the second coating, laminating, or winding. Following its final rewind, the coated, and possibly laminated, web is slit according to customer
specifications (if necessary), packaged, and shipped.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Source is peer reviewed so likely contains little to no errors in data quality.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Low
N/A

Report is from US.

Data is directly applicable to a condition of use however the source neglects to mention
any information regarding DCHP or any phthalates.

Data is greater than 20 years old.

No sample data.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Report clearly documents results, methods and assumptions. Sources are generally
described.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Continued on next page ...

Page 260 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyclohexyl Phthalate	General Engineering Assessment	HERO ID: 5466433 Table: 1 of 1

... continued from previous page

Study Citation:

HERO ID:
Conditions of Use:

Nunez, C., McMinn, B., Vitas, J. (1996). Barriers to the use of radiation-curable adhesives in the coated and laminated substrate manufacturing industry.

Journal of Hazardous Materials 45(l):59-78.

5466433

Processing - Adhesive Manufacturing

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments



Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

Medium Addresses variability by talking about different processing methods but does not address
uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination

Medium



Page 261 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 7681900 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:

OECD, (2018). Socio-economic assessment of phthalates.

HERO ID:

7681900

Conditions of Use:

Plasticizers



EXTRACTION

Parameter

Data

Production, import, or use volume: The biggest market for phthalates globally is the People's Republic of China, accounting for around 45% of all use. Europe and the United States together account

for around 25% of use, with the remainder widely spread around the world. The phthalate plasticiser market currently stands at around 5.5 million tonnes per year,
(page 15/90)

Process description:	Phthalates are esters of phthalic acid, made by reacting phthalic anhydride with alcohols from methanol and ethanol to tridecyl (C13) alcohol. This chemistry

leads to a large number of different phthalates with varying properties (such as DCHP) (page 15/90)

Chemical concentration:	Phthalates can contribute as much as 50% of the weight of PVC materials, (page 15/90)

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Assessment uses high quality data from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
High

High
N/A

Data is from an OECD report.

Data are for plasticizers in plastic and resin manufacturing, an in-scope occupational
scenario.

Assessment is based on current industry conditions and data no more than 10 years old.
This metric is not applicable to the data being extracted

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Variability and uncertainty are not addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 262 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyclohexyl Phthalate	General Engineering Assessment	HERO ID: 1598544 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Pak, V. M., Mccauley, L. A. (2007). Risks of phthalate exposure among the general population: Implications for occupational health nurses. American

Association of Occupational Health Nurses lournal 55(1):12-17.

HERO ID:	1598544

Conditions of Use: Commercial Use

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Number of sites:

Approximately 81,000 beauty salons in the U.S





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

Medium

Report uses high quality data that are not from frequently-used sources and there are no
known quality issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Low

Medium
N/A

Data are from the U.S.

The report is for a non-occupational scenario that is similar to an occupational scenario
within the scope of the risk evaluation (commercial use of inks, toner, colorant products
similar to products in beauty salons).

Report is based on data greater than 10 years old but no more than 20 years old and
industry conditions that are expected to be representative of current industry conditions.
No sample data.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

N/A

No scope to address variability and uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 263 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6580284 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:

programs, E.O. (1974). Air pollution control engineering and cost study of the paint and varnish industry.

HERO ID:

6580284

Conditions of Use:

Processing: Formulation of paint and varnish



EXTRACTION

Parameter

Data

Production, import, or use volume: Trade sale finishes and industrial finishes are produced in almost equal volume with the production for 1972 estimated at 465 million gallons for trade sales and

485 million gallons for industrial finishes.

Process description:	Mixing or dispersing pigment and vehicle to give the final product. The paint vehicle is defined as the liquid portion of the paint and consists of volatile solvent

or dispersing medium and non-volatile binder such as oils and resins. The non-volatile portion is also called the vehicle solid or film former. The incorporation
of the pigment in the paint vehicle is accomplished by a combination of grinding and dispersion or dispersion alone. When it is necessary to further grind the
raw pigment, pebble or steel ball mills are normally used. With the advent of fine particle grades of pigment and extenders, as well as the wide spread use of
wetting agents, the trend is toward milling methods that are based on dispersion without grinding. Dispersion consists of breaking up of the pigment clusters and
agglomerates, followed by wetting of the individual particles with the binder or vehicle. Some of the more popular methods currently being used are high-speed
disc impellers, high speed impingement mills and the sand mill. II There are two basic types of varnishes, spirit varnishes and oleoresinous varnishes. Spirit
varnishes are formed by dissolving a resin in a solvent and they dry by evaporation of the solvent. The dry film formed undergoes no substantial change in the
process of drying and is classified as non-convertible. Varnish is cooked in both portable kettles and large reactors. Kettles are used only to a limited extent and
primarily by the smaller manufacturers. The very old, coke fired, 30 gallon capacity copper kettles are no longer used. The varnish kettles which are used, have
capacities of 150 to 375 gallons. These are fabricated of stainless steel, have straight sides and are equipped with three or four-wheel trucks. Heating is done
with natural gas or fuel oil for better temperature control. The kettles are fitted with retractable hoods and exhaust pipes, some of which may incorporate solvent
condensers. Cooling and thinning is normally done in special rooms. II Source contains more information on raw materials, specific processes, and equipment.

Number of sites:	The industry is made up of about 1,600 companies operating about 1,875 plants

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The report is developed by EPA.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:

Geographic Scope

High

The data are from the United States and are representative of the industry being evalu-
ated.

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation, but
information is general and not specific to DCHP.

The report is more than 20 years old.

No sample data.

Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium

Low
N/A

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Assessment or report clearly documents results, methods, and assumptions. Data
sources are generally described but not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

N/A

Information is process description and PV for 1972. No scope to address variability and
uncertainty.

Continued on next page ...

Page 264 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyclohexyl Phthalate	General Engineering Assessment	HERO ID: 6580284 Table: 1 of 1

... continued from previous page

Study Citation:
HERO ID:

programs, E.O. (1974). Air pollution control engineering and cost study of the paint and varnish industry.
6580284



Conditions of Use:

Processing: Formulation of paint and varnish





EVALUATION



Domain

Metric Rating

Comments

Overall Quality Determination Medium



Page 265 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 1335691 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:

Radian Corp, (1989). Environmental analysis for the Shell Martinez RM-17 incinerator, with cover letter dated 3/15/1991 (sanitized).

HERO ID:

1335691

Conditions of Use:

Disposal - Waste incineration



EXTRACTION

Parameter

Data

Process description:	Figure 2-1 provides diagram of process. Shell incinerator contains a single combustion chamber with waste injection nozzles located at the base. The unit operates

with a firebox temperature ranging between 1,400 to 1,800 F. The air pollution control equipment located downstream of the firebox includes a quench column to
cool the hot combustion gases, a Venturi scrubber for control of particulate matter, a packed bed wet scrubber for acid gas control, and a mist eliminator to control
liquid aerosol emissions. Combustion gases exit the incinerator system through a 100-foot stack.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Report uses high quality data, techniques and methods that are from the EPA and do not
indicate flaws or quality issues

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Low
N/A

Data is from the US

Data contains general phthalate emissions and exposures but does not contain informa-
tion specific to DCHP. Data could possibly be used as analogous data
Assessment is more than 20 years old.

This metric is not applicable to the data being extracted

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Provides results but the underlying methods, data sources and assumptions are not fully
transparent

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Does not address variability or uncertainty

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 266 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6302566 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Restek Corp, (2019). 33227/EPA Method 8061A Phthalate Esters Mixture.

HERO ID:	6302566

Conditions of Use: Laboratory chemical

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

0.10%
Liquid





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Low

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2023, which is less than 10 years old.

Single value - no distribution/statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Does not address variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 267 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 10472417 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	RFCI, (2020). Comments of the Resilient Floor Covering Institute (RFCI) on the Safer Products for Washington Priority Consumer Products draft report

to Legislature.

HERO ID:	10472417

Conditions of Use: PVC Processing

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Life cycle description:

Chemical concentration:
Comments:

Plasticizers, such as DINP, are widely used to make inherently rigid materials, such as PVC, soft and flexible. Indeed, 95% of DINP is used in PVC applications.
DINP does not chemically bind to the PVC, but is incorporated into it during processing, to allow it to flex. Because DINP processes efficiently (it improves PVC
melt viscosity), it takes less time and lower temperatures to incorporate it into the PVC, and to produce the finished product. Accordingly, manufacturing using
the product-chemical combination is energy efficient.

OEHHA considered an "upper-end estimate" of exposure to DINP in vinyl flooring containing 18.9% or less DINP by weight.

Concentration and process description related to DCHP was not found in the document.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

Medium

OEHHA provided as reference for concentration of DINP in vinyl flooring. Data does
not indicate quality issues, but methodology for determining chemical concentration is
not transparent.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:

Geographic Scope

High

The data are from the United States and are representative of the industry being evalu-
ated.

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation but data
is not chemical specific.

The report is generally no more than 10 years old.

Sample size was not provided for determination of chemical concentration.

Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium

High
Low

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Assessment or report clearly documents results, methods, and assumptions. Data
sources are generally described but not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

The report does not address variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 268 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 7324725 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:

Rodgers, B., Tallury, S. S., Klingensmith, W. (2016). Rubber compounding. : 1-60.

HERO ID:

7324725

Conditions of Use:

Plasticizers in rubber product manufacturing



EXTRACTION

Parameter

Data

Process description:	Softeners, extenders, and plasticizers can affect the properties of rubber. The term plasticizer is used to denote the ability to act as an internal lubricant for

processing purposes as well as for improving low temperature flexibility in the vulcanized product. The synthetic phthalates are the most effective in meeting
low temperature flexibility while also serving as softeners, but cost limits their application. The main benefits of processing aids are (1) improve incorporation
of fillers, (2) reducing mixing energies, (3) reducing internal friction for ease of milling, extruding, and calendering, (4) compatibilizing the different rubbers for
improved processing as well as for better adhesion of one compound to a different compound in the vulcanized tire (compatibilizers have gained markedly in
usage because of polarity differences of blended polymers), and (5) providing improved green tack (tackifiers) for better tire building. There is a definite trend in
the industry to develop multifunctional materials with value-added properties, (page 54-55/60)

Comments:	DCHP not specifically mentioned.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Report uses high quality data from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High

High
N/A

Data are from the U.S.

Data are for plasticizers in rubber product manufacturing, an in-scope occupational
scenario.

Assessment is based on current industry conditions and data no more than 10 years old.
This metric is not applicable to the data being extracted

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

N/A

This metric is not applicable to the data being extracted

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 269 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303184 Table: 1 of 2

Study Citation:	S.A., R. (2015). R-CAS-V.

HERO ID:	6303184

Conditions of Use: Use of adhesives and sealants

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

<1.8%
solid powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium

High
Medium
Medium

From an OECD country

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
More than 10 but less than 20 years old
Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 270 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 6303 m Table: 2 of 2

Study Citation:	S.A., R. (2015). R-CAS-V.

HERO ID:	6303184

Conditions of Use: Incorporation into adhesives and sealants

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

<1.8%
solid powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium

High
Medium
Medium

From an OECD country

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
More than 10 but less than 20 years old
Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 271 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303188 Table: 1 of 2

Study Citation:	Sauereisen (2015). 400 Vinyl ester mortar (silica filled), powder.

HERO ID:	6303188

Conditions of Use: Use of paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

<0.005%
Granular powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Medium

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2020, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 272 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 6303188 Table: 2 of 2

Study Citation:	Sauereisen (2015). 400 Vinyl ester mortar (silica filled), powder.

HERO ID:	6303188

Conditions of Use: Incorporation into paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

<0.005%
Granular powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Medium

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2020, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 273 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303186 Table: 1 of 2

Study Citation:	Shoof International Ltd (2019). Cowslips powder.

HERO ID:	6303186

Conditions of Use: Use of paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

<3%

White powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
High
High
Medium

From an OECD country

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2019, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 274 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 6303186 Table: 2 of 2

Study Citation:	Shoof International Ltd (2019). Cowslips powder.

HERO ID:	6303186

Conditions of Use: Incorporation into paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

<3%

White powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
High
High
Medium

From an OECD country

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2019, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 275 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303191 Table: 1 of 2

Study Citation:	Sika Corporation (2017). Sikagard® CRV-20 Part B.

HERO ID:	6303191

Conditions of Use: Incorporation into paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

>=50- <100%
Powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Medium

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2017, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 276 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 6303191 Table: 2 of 2

Study Citation:	Sika Corporation (2017). Sikagard® CRV-20 Part B.

HERO ID:	6303191

Conditions of Use: Use of paints and coatings

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

>=50- <100%
Powder





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Medium

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2017, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 277 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 6303157 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Supply, G.I. (2018). X102452, X102822, X102839, X102840, L-3049.

HERO ID:	6303157

Conditions of Use: Use of printing ink

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Chemical concentration:
Physical form:

0.8-4.1%

Viscous liquid, clear to slightly opaque





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

SDS information is primary data from the supplier. SDS does not appear to have quality
issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Medium

Product is from a US supplier.

SDS is applicable to an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
Source is from 2018, which is less than 10 years old.

Characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Source just provides concentration and does not document how this value was obtained.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability addressed by providing a range of potential concentrations. Uncertainty not
addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 278 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: i 1138808 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:
HERO ID:
Conditions of Use:

U.S. BLS, (2023). U.S. Census Bureau of Labor Statistics Data from 2021.

11138808

All

Parameter



Data

EXTRACTION

Number of sites:



Used to develop a method to estimate number of sites and workers.

Domain



Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

BLS is expected to use reliable survey methods.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
High

U.S. based economic data.

These economic data cover all industry and occupation types in scope for all chemicals.
The BLS OES data are from 2021.

The BLS OES program provides detailed statistics and estimated relative
standard error for each state, industry, and occupation survey conducted
(https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_research_estimates.htm).

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

BLS documents results and methods, but underlying survey results not accessible.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Limited discussion of variability and uncertainty in results.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 279 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 10293388 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:

U.S. EPA, (2002). Flexographic ink options: A cleaner technologies substitutes assessment. Volume 1.

HERO ID:

10293388

Conditions of Use:

Industrial and commercial use in ink, toner and colorant products



EXTRACTION

Parameter

Data

Production, import, or use volume: In 2000, the industry overall used more than 513 million pounds of ink. Water-based inks represent 65% of all inks used during flexographic printing, where the

remaining 35% are solvent-based inks. The U.S. exported about 115 million pounds of printing ink in 1998. Page 78 of the pdf provides a table of the top 20
manufacturers of inks.

Process description:	Source describes solvent-based ink process, water-based ink process, and UV cured ink process. The source also describes the type of substrates typically used

during manufacturing which includes, corrugated and preprinted containers, flexible film packaging, folding cartons, labels and tag, and other (pdf pages 74-75).
Source also lists typical components of inks (pdf pages 69-71)

Number of sites:	914 commercial printing with flexographic printing as the primary print process but 2,300 facilities operate flexographic printing in addition to other printing. A

total of 30,000 employees for facilities with flexographic printing as the primary print process and over 80% have fewer than 50 employees

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods that
are from frequently used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:

Geographic Scope

High

The data are from the United States and are representative of the industry being evalu-
ated.

Data are for use in ink during printing, an in-scope occupational scenario. However, data
is general and not specific to this chemical.

Most of the data is from more than 20 years back.

Distribution of samples is characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium

Low
Medium

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

Assessment or report clearly documents its data sources, assessment methods, results,
and assumptions.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

High

Variability is addressed by looking at different years and uncertainty is also addressed.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 280 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 10366189 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	U.S. EPA, (2020). 2020 CDR: Commercial and consumer use.

HERO ID:	10366189

Conditions of Use: Commercial Use

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Production, import, or use volume:
Number of sites:

Chemical concentration:

Physical form:

Number of workers:

Provides U.S. domestic commercial use PV and %PV to downstream uses.

Provides number of commercial sites

Provides concentration.

Provides physical form.

Provides number of workers.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Source is EPA.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
High
Medium

CDR is U.S. based data.

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
EPA used data from the 2020 CDR.

Due to reporting threshold, statistical representativeness is unclear.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Submissions do not include method of how production volumes were determined. CDR
industry sector codes, industrial processing and use codes, industrial function codes, and
commercial product codes provide good metadata; but lack of clarifying information and
narratives and occasional misreportings limit clarity of data.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

CDR data do not address variability or uncertainty in submitter provided data.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 281 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 4565597 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:

U.S. EPA, (2012). Phthalates action plan.



HERO ID:

4565597



Conditions of Use:

Manufacturing







EXTRACTION

Parameter

Data



Production, import, or use volume: Phthalates are produced in high volume, over 470 million pounds per year (EPA 2006).

Life cycle description:	Based on a comparison of TRI releases to IUR data, production and import volumes indicate that the vast majority (likely between 95% and 99.9%) of phthalates

can be expected to be incorporated into plastics and other products.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods
that are from frequently used sources (e.g., European Union or OECD reports, NIOSH
HHEs, journal articles, Kirk-Othmer) and are generally accepted by the scientific com-
munity, and associated information does not indicate flaws or quality issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:

Geographic Scope

High

The data are from the United States and are representative of the industry being evalu-
ated.

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation but data
is general and not specific to DCHP.

The report captures operations, equipment, and worker activities expected to be repre-
sentative of current conditions. The report is generally no more than 10 years old.
No sample data.

Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
High
N/A

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

Assessment or report clearly documents its data sources, assessment methods, results,
and assumptions.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

N/A

No scope to address variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination

High





Page 282 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 7310513 Table: 1 of 6

Study Citation:	U.S. EPA, (1995). Chapter 6: Organic chemical process industry. Compilation of air pollutant emission factors. Volume I: Stationary point and area

sources, fifth edition, AP-42.

HERO ID:	7310513

Conditions of Use: Paint and Varnish Manufacturing

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Process description:

Process description on page 29. II The manufacture of paint involves the dispersion of a colored oil or pigment in a vehicle, usually an oil or resin, followed by the
addition of an organic solvent for viscosity adjustment. Only the physical processes of weighing, mixing, grinding, tinting, thinning, and packaging take place. No
chemical reactions are involved. II The manufacture of varnish also involves the mixing and blending of various ingredients to produce a wide range of products.
However in this case, chemical reactions are initiated by heating. Varnish is cooked in either open or enclosed gas-fired kettles for periods of 4 to 16 hours at
temperatures of 93 to 340°C (200 to 6500 P).

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods that
are from frequently used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:

Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Low

N/A

The data are from the United States.

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation. How-
ever, DCHP not specifically mentioned.

Report is based on data greater than 20 years old and industry conditions that are ex-
pected to be outdated.

Information is qualitative.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Assessment or report clearly documents results, methods, and assumptions. Data
sources are generally described but not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

The report does not address variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 283 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 7310513 Table: 2 of 6

Study Citation:	U.S. EPA, (1995). Chapter 6: Organic chemical process industry. Compilation of air pollutant emission factors. Volume I: Stationary point and area

sources, fifth edition, AP-42.

HERO ID:	7310513

Conditions of Use: Plastics Manufacturing

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Process description:

Process description on page 41. The manufacture of most resins or plastics begins with the polymerization or linking of the basic compound (monomer), usually a
gas or liquid, into high molecular weight noncrystalline solids. The manufacture of the basic monomer is not considered part of the plastics industry and is usually
accomplished at a chemical or petroleum plant. Additional description provided.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods that
are from frequently used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:

Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High

Low

N/A

The data are from the United States.

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation. How-
ever, DCHP not specifically mentioned.

Report is based on data greater than 20 years old and industry conditions that are ex-
pected to be outdated.

Information is qualitative.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Assessment or report clearly documents results, methods, and assumptions. Data
sources are generally described but not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

The report does not address variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 284 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 7310513 Table: 3 of 6

Study Citation:	U.S. EPA, (1995). Chapter 6: Organic chemical process industry. Compilation of air pollutant emission factors. Volume I: Stationary point and area

sources, fifth edition, AP-42.

HERO ID:	7310513

Conditions of Use: Printing ink Manufacturing

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Process description:

Process description on page 75. There are 3 general processes in the manufacture of printing inks: (1) cooking the vehicle and adding dyes, (2) grinding of a
pigment into the vehicle using a roller mill, and (3) replacing water in the wet pigment pulp by an ink vehicle (commonly known as the flushing process).3 The ink
"varnish" or vehicle is generally cooked in large kettles at 200 to 600°F (93 to 315°C) for an average of 8 to 12 hours in much the same way that regular varnish
is made. Mixing of the pigment and vehicle is done in dough mixers or in large agitated tanks. Grinding is most often carried out in 3-roller or 5-roller horizontal
or vertical mills. Additional description provided.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods that
are from frequently used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:

Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Low

N/A

The data are from the United States.

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation. How-
ever, DCHP not specifically mentioned.

Report is based on data greater than 20 years old and industry conditions that are ex-
pected to be outdated.

Information is qualitative.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Assessment or report clearly documents results, methods, and assumptions. Data
sources are generally described but not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

The report does not address variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 285 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 7310513 Table: 4 of 6

Study Citation:	U.S. EPA, (1995). Chapter 6: Organic chemical process industry. Compilation of air pollutant emission factors. Volume I: Stationary point and area

sources, fifth edition, AP-42.

HERO ID:	7310513

Conditions of Use: Soap and Detergent Manufacturing

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Process description:	Process description on page 77. The term "soap" refers to a particular type of detergent in which the water-solubilized group iscarboxylate and the positive ion is

usually sodium or potassium. The largest soap market is bar soap used for personal bathing. Synthetic detergents replaced soap powders for home laundering in
the late 1940s, because the carboxylate ions of the soap react with the calcium and magnesium ions in the natural hard water to form insoluble materials called
lime soap. Some commercial laundries that have soft water continue to use soap powders. Metallic soaps are alkali-earth or heavy-metal long-chain carboxylates
that are insoluble in water but soluble in non-aqueous solvents. They are used as additives in lubricating oils, greases, rust inhibitors, and jellied fuels. The
term "synthetic detergent products" applies broadly to cleaning and laundering compounds containing surface-active (surfactant) compounds along with other
ingredients. Heavy-duty powders and liquids for home and commercial laundry detergent comprise 60 to 65 percent of the U. S. soap and detergent market and
were estimated at 2.6 megagrams (Mg) (2.86 million tons) in 1990. Additional description provided.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods that
are from frequently used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:

Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Uninformative

Low

N/A

The data are from the United States.

Soap and detergent manufacturing is not an occupational scenario within the scope of
the risk evaluation.

Report is based on data greater than 20 years old and industry conditions that are ex-
pected to be outdated.

Information is qualitative.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Assessment or report clearly documents results, methods, and assumptions. Data
sources are generally described but not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

The report does not address variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	Uninformative

Page 286 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 7310513 Table: 5 of 6

Study Citation:	U.S. EPA, (1995). Chapter 6: Organic chemical process industry. Compilation of air pollutant emission factors. Volume I: Stationary point and area

sources, fifth edition, AP-42.

HERO ID:	7310513

Conditions of Use: Synthetic fiber Manufacturing

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Process description:

Process description on page 85. Semi-synthetics are formed from natural polymeric materials such as cellulose. True synthetics are products of the polymerization
of smaller chemical units into long-chain molecular polymers. Fibers are formed by forcing a viscous fluid or solution of the polymer through the small orifices of
a spinnerette (see Figure 6.9-1) and immediately solidifying or precipitating the resulting filaments. This prepared polymer may also be used in the manufacture
of other non-fiber products such as the enormous number of extruded plastic and synthetic rubber products. Additional description provided.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods that
are from frequently used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:

Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Low

N/A

The data are from the United States.

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation. How-
ever, DCHP not specifically mentioned.

Report is based on data greater than 20 years old and industry conditions that are ex-
pected to be outdated.

Information is qualitative.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Assessment or report clearly documents results, methods, and assumptions. Data
sources are generally described but not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

The report does not address variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 287 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 7310513 Table: 6 of 6

Study Citation:	U.S. EPA, (1995). Chapter 6: Organic chemical process industry. Compilation of air pollutant emission factors. Volume I: Stationary point and area

sources, fifth edition, AP-42.

HERO ID:	7310513

Conditions of Use: Synthetic rubber Manufacturing

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Process description:

Process description on page 107. Two types of polymerization reaction are used to produce styrene-butadiene copolymers, the emulsion type and the solution
type. This section addresses volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from the manufacture of copolymers of styrene and butadiene made by emulsion
polymerization processes. The emulsion products can be sold in either a granular solid form, known as crumb, or in a liquid form, known as latex. Additional
description provided

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods that
are from frequently used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:

Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High

Low

N/A

The data are from the United States.

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation. How-
ever, DCHP not specifically mentioned.

Report is based on data greater than 20 years old and industry conditions that are ex-
pected to be outdated.

Information is qualitative.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Assessment or report clearly documents results, methods, and assumptions. Data
sources are generally described but not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

The report does not address variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 288 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 7315820 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	U.S. EPA, (1995). Chapter 4.2: Introduction to surface coating. Compilation of air pollutant emission factors. Volume I: Stationary point and area sources,

fifth edition, AP-42.

HERO ID:	7315820

Conditions of Use: Use (Paints and Coatings)

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Process description:	Though DCHP is not specifically mentioned, the group of articles provide information on various types of coating on metal and non-mental surfaces. As for

example, process description for can coating includes description of sheet coating. Sheet coating includes base coating and printing or lithographing, followed
by curing at temperatures of up to 220°C (425°F). When the sheets have been formed into cylinders, the seam is sprayed, usually with a lacquer, to protect the
exposed metal. If they are to contain an edible product, the interiors are spray coated, and the cans baked at up to 220°C (425 °F).

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Report uses high quality data.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Low
N/A

The data are from the United States.

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation but data

is not specific to DCHP.

The report is more than 20 years old.

No sample data.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

Report clearly documents its data sources.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

N/A

Process description.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 289 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 7315841 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:

U.S. EPA, (1995). Ap-42: Chapter 4.12 - Manufacture of rubber products.

HERO ID:

7315841

Conditions of Use:

Processing: Rubber Product Manufacturing



EXTRACTION

Parameter

Data

Process description:	Many of the rubber manufacturing facilities in the United States produce pneumatic tires for automobile, trucks, airplanes, and farm machinery. However, many

rubber manufacturing facilities produce other engineered rubber products. The processes involved in these industries are very similar. Differences basically consist
of the raw rubber material (natural or synthetic) used, the chemical additives, and the type of curing employed. The following is a description of a generic rubber
manufacturing facility applicable to both tire and other manufactured rubber products, except where noted. The manufacturing of rubber products involves six
processing steps (mixing, milling, extrusion, calendaring, curing, and grinding), with ancillary steps in between. Initially, the raw rubber (natural or synthetic)
is mixed with several additives which are chosen based upon the desired properties of the final product. The mixed rubber is often milled and transferred to
an extruder where it can be combined with other rubbers. Many rubber products contain synthetic fabric or fibers for strengthening purposes. These fibers are
typically coated with mixed rubber using a calender. The extruded rubber and rubber coated materials are then assembled into a final shape and cured. Among
the steps in the tire assembly process are bead building; cementing and marking; cutting and cooling; tire building; and green tire spraying. It is during the curing
process that the rubber vulcanizes (crosslinks), producing the characteristic properties of finished rubber. Once the final product is cured, it is often ground to
remove rough surfaces and/or to achieve symmetry.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Report uses high quality data from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:

Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Low

N/A

Data are from the U.S.

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation, how-
ever data is general and not specific to DCHP.

Report is based on data greater than 20 years old and industry conditions that are ex-
pected to be outdated.

No sample data.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

N/A

Process description.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 290 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 7315971 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	U.S. EPA, (1995). AP-42: Chapter 11.1 - Hot mix asphalt plants.

HERO ID:	7315971

Conditions of Use: Formulation of asphalt

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Production, import, or use volume: In 1996, approximately 500 million tons of HMA were produced. The total 1996 HMA production from batch and drum mix plants is estimated at about 240

million tons and 260 million tons, respectively.

Process description:	Hot mix asphalt (HMA) paving materials are a mixture of size-graded, high quality aggregate (which can include reclaimed asphalt pavement [RAP]), and liquid

asphalt cement, which is heated and mixed in measured quantities to produce HMA. Aggregate and RAP (if used) constitute over 92 percent by weight of the total
mixture. Hot mix asphalt paving materials can be manufactured by: (1) batch mix plants, (2) continuous mix (mix outside dryer drum) plants, (3) parallel flow
drum mix plants, and (4) counterflow drum mix plants. This order of listing generally reflects the chronological order of development and use within the HMA
industry. Source contains a process description of each type of process.

Number of sites:	In 1996, approximately 500 million tons of HMA were produced at the 3,600 (estimated) active asphalt plants in the United States. Of these 3,600 plants,

approximately 2,300 are batch plants, 1,000 are parallel flow drum mix plants, and 300 are counterflow drum mix plants.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High	The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods

that are from frequently used sources (e.g., European Union or OECD reports, NIOSH
HHEs, journal articles, Kirk-Othmer) and are generally accepted by the scientific com-
munity, and associated information does not indicate flaws or quality issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:

Geographic Scope

High

The data are from the United States and are representative of the industry being evalu-
ated.

Data is for an in-scope occupational scenario; however, data is general and not specific
to this chemical.

Metric 3:

Applicability

Medium

Metric 4:

Temporal Representativeness

Low

The report is more than 20 years old. The report captures operations, equipment, and
worker activities that are expected to be outdated.

Metric 5:

Sample Size

N/A

No sample data.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Assessment or report clearly documents results, methods, and assumptions. Data
sources are generally described but not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

N/A

PV, number of sites, and process description. No scope to address variability and uncer-
tainty.

Overall Quality Determination

Medium





Page 291 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 9102524 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:

U.S. EPA, (2016). Federal research action plan on recycled tire crumb used on playing field and playgrounds. Status report.

HERO ID:

9102524

Conditions of Use:

Plastic and rubber products not covered elsewhere



EXTRACTION

Parameter

Data

Process description:	Two tire recycling processes, (1) ambient and (2) cryogenic, are used to create tire crumb rubber in the 10- to 20-mesh (0.84- to 2.0-mm) size, which is generally

the size used in synthetic turf infill. The ambient process uses granulation or cracker mills to produce tire crumb rubber at room temperature. Cracker mills
use revolving rollers with serrations in them to size-reduce the tires. Once the granules are produced, they are fed through screens and sorted to the appropriate
size. The cryogenic process uses liquid nitrogen to freeze partially shredded tires, which then are fed into a hammer mill to create tire crumb rubber. Fabric (i.e.,
polyester, nylon, or other fibers) and steel belt components of the scrap tire are separated in both processes. Fabric is removed from the rubber using air classifiers
or vacuums, while the steel is removed using magnetic separators. Gravity separators also can be used to remove contaminant particles, such as rocks, and can aid
in the sorting process. Likewise, water can be used for pre-washing to remove gravel and dirt and cooling during the ambient process; otherwise no chemicals are
added to the original rubber composition during either process. Following processing, tire crumb rubber typically is placed into one-ton sacks and distributed to
fields for spreading, (page 14/169)

Number of sites:	Currently, there are between 12,000 and 13,000 synthetic turf recreational fields in the United States, with 1,200 - 1,500 new installations each year, (page 4/169)

There are nine tire crumb rubber producers in the U.S. that produce 95% of the recycled rubber used in synthetic turf, (page 13/169) There are approximately
eight major synthetic field installers in the United States, (page 15/169)

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Report uses high quality data from frequently-used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

High
Medium

Data are from the U.S.

Data are for phthalate use in toys, playground, and sporting equipment, which can be
both a commercial or consumer use.

Assessment is based on current industry conditions and data no more than 10 years old.
Sample distribution characterized by limited statistics (ranges, number of sites) but
discrete samples not provided and distribution not fully characterized.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

All data sources, methods, results, and assumptions are clearly documented.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability is addressed by explaining two turf production processes. Uncertainty isn't
addressed in terms of facility information..

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 292 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 9102546 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	U.S. EPA, (2002). An evaluation of flexographic inks on wide-web film: Summary booklet.

HERO ID:	9102546

Conditions of Use: Inks, toner and colorant products

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Production, import, or use volume:
Life cycle description:

Throughput:

Flexo printing consumed more than 513 million pounds of ink in 2000. pg. 9
Flexible film packaging accounts for nearly 20% of the flexo market, pg. 9
Materials Used (lb/6,000 ft2) Solvent-based: 8.53Water-based: 4.14UV-cured: 2.16

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods that
are from frequently used sources.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:

Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High

Medium

Low
N/A

The data are from the United States and are representative of the industry being evalu-
ated.

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation but
information is not chemical specific.

The report is more than 20 years old.

No sample data.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Assessment or report clearly documents results, methods, and assumptions. Data
sources are generally described but not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Variability is addressed by including different ink systems but uncertainty is not ad-
dressed.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 293 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 9109783 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	U.S. EPA, (1977). Industrial process profiles for environmental use: Chapter 13. Plasticizers industry.

HERO ID:	9109783

Conditions of Use: Manufacturing

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Production, import, or use volume:
Process description:

Throughput:

Number of sites:

1.89 billion lbs in 1974.

Figure 1 shows the process flow. (P. 22/86)

980 Gg/yr. (P. 9/86). Table 2.

17 manufacturing facilities. (P. 9/86)





Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
High
Low
Medium

The data are from the United States

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.
The report is more than 20 years old.

Distribution of samples is characterized by a range with uncertain statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

Assessment or report clearly documents its data sources, assessment methods, results,
and assumptions.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

The report does not address variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 294 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 59547 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Vandervort, R., Brooks, S. M. (1977). Polyvinyl chloride film thermal decomposition products as an occupational illness: I. Environmental exposures and

toxicology. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 19(3): 188-191.

HERO ID:	59547

Conditions of Use: PVC film and label adhesive in meat packing

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Production, import, or use volume:
Number of sites:

Chemical concentration:

About 80-90 million lbs of PVC film are used in the wrapping of meat each year. Another 30 to 35 million lbs are used to wrap produce and other products.
Majority of meat wrappers work in the US 40,000 to 45,000 supermarkets.

Plasticizers can constitute up to 30% of the PVC film. Label adhesives can contain up to 60% by weight DCHP.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Source is peer reviewed so likely contains high quality data.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Medium

Low
Low

Data is for US

Data is applicable to commercial use of PVC film and adhesives. No DCHP specific
data

Data is over 20 years old (1977).

Not characterized by statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

Assessment or report clearly documents its data sources, assessment methods, results,
and assumptions.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Does not address variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 295 of 299


-------
Dicyclohexyl Phthalate

PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

General Engineering Assessment

HERO ID: 5547263 Table: 1 of 2

Study Citation:	Wang, Y., Zhu, H., Kannan, K. (2019). A review of biomonitoring of phthalate exposures. Toxics 7(2):21.

HERO ID:	5547263

Conditions of Use: Manufacturing

EXTRACTION

Parameter	Data

Production, import, or use volume: The annual global production of phthalate was 4.7 million metric tons in 2006 [6,7] and ~8 million metric tons in 2015 [8],

Life cycle description:	The high molecular weight phthalates are used primarily in PVC polymers and plastisol applications, plastics, food packaging, and food processing materials,

vinyl toys and vinyl floor coverings, and building products. The low molecular weight phthalates are often used in non-PVC applications, such as personal care
products, paints, adhesives, and enteric-coated tablets [44], BzBP, DEHP, DiNP, DBP, and DiBP are used in toys, bags, gloves, and plastic tubing for improving
flexibility and making the polymeric products soft and malleable [4], DMP and DEP are widely used in cosmetics, such as perfumes, aftershaves, shampoos,
makeup, and nail care products [4],

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods

that are from frequently used sources (e.g., European Union or OECD reports, NIOSH
HHEs, journal articles, Kirk-Othmer) and are generally accepted by the scientific com-
munity, and associated information does not indicate flaws or quality issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:

Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium Article is published by an OECD country.

Medium The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation, how-
ever data is general and not specific to DCHP.

High The report captures operations, equipment, and worker activities expected to be repre-
sentative of current conditions. The report is generally no more than 10 years old.
N/A No sample data.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6: Metadata Completeness

High Assessment or report clearly documents its data sources, assessment methods, results,
and assumptions.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty

Metric 7: Metadata Completeness

N/A No scope to address variability and uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination

High

Page 296 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 5547263 Table: 2 of 2

Study Citation: Wang, Y., Zhu, H., Kannan, K. (2019). A review of biomonitoring of phthaiate exposures. Toxics 7(2):21.
HERO ID: 5547263
Conditions of Use: Use: Plastic Products

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION

Chemical concentration:

PVC products may contain up to 50% (by weight) phthalates. Food packaging plastic film contains phthalates (such as DBP and DEP) at levels of up to 10% by
weight.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods
that are from frequently used sources (e.g., European Union or OECD reports, NIOSH
HHEs, journal articles, Kirk-Othmer) and are generally accepted by the scientific com-
munity, and associated information does not indicate flaws or quality issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:

Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Medium
Medium

High

N/A

Article is published by an OECD country.

Data is general and not specific to DCHP although use of plastic products is in scope of
the risk evaluation.

The report captures operations, equipment, and worker activities expected to be repre-
sentative of current conditions. The report is generally no more than 10 years old.
No sample data.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

High

Assessment or report clearly documents its data sources, assessment methods, results,
and assumptions.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

N/A

No scope to address variability and uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	High

Page 297 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 516423i Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation:	Young, A. S., Allen, J. G., Kim, U. J., Seller, S., Webster, T. F., Kannan, K., Ceballos, D. M. (2018). Phthaiate and Organophosphate Plasticizers in Nail

Polish: Evaluation of Labels and Ingredients. Environmental Science & Technology 52(21):12841-12850. [Environmental science & technology],

HERO ID:	5164231

Conditions of Use: Consumer use - nail polish

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:

Table 4: DCHP not detected in nail polish products



Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

The assessment or report uses high quality data and/or techniques or sound methods that
are not from a frequently used source and associated information does not indicate flaws
or quality issues.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:

Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

High
Low

High
Low

Data is from US.

The data is for consumer use of nail polish but data may be used for similar occupational

scenario like commercial use of inks, toner and colorant product.

Report data from 2016-2018 so less than 10 years old.

Distribution of samples is qualitative or characterized by no statistics.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Report provides results and sources are generally described.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Addresses variability by using multiple samples but not uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination

Medium





Page 298 of 299


-------
PUBLIC RELEASE DRAFT
December 2024

Dicyciohexyi Phthaiate	General Engineering Assessment	hero id: 5533553 Table: 1 of 1

Study Citation: Zhang, L.,i, Su, W.,ei, Qian, Y., Zhao, Y., Zhu, Z., Wang, D. (2016). Quantitative detection and impact evaluation of phthaiate plasticizers in insulating oil.

IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation 23(6):3429-3434.

HERO ID: 5533553

Conditions of Use: Industrial Use: Plasticizer in insulating oil

Parameter

Data

EXTRACTION



Chemical concentration:

Table 5 gives DCHP concentration in insulating oil samples (mg/L): ND, 2.20, 0.88, 1.43, 0.91, 0.90; Table 7 gives other concentrations of seven oil samples:
1.50, and the rest are NDs.

Domain

Metric

EVALUATION

Rating

Comments

Domain 1: Reliability

Metric 1:

Methodology

High

Source is peer reviewed so likely contains high quality data.

Domain 2: Representativeness

Metric 2:
Metric 3:
Metric 4:
Metric 5:

Geographic Scope
Applicability

Temporal Representativeness
Sample Size

Low
High
High
Medium

Data is from China, a non-OECD country.

The report is for an occupational scenario within the scope of the risk evaluation.

Report is from 2016, less than 10 years old.

Distribution of samples is characterized by a range with uncertain statistics. It is unclear
if analysis is representative.

Domain 3: Accessibility/ Clarity

Metric 6:

Metadata Completeness

Medium

Assessment or report clearly documents results, methods, and assumptions. Data
sources are generally described but not fully transparent.

Domain 4: Variability and Uncertainty
Metric 7:

Metadata Completeness

Low

Does not address variability or uncertainty.

Overall Quality Determination	Medium

Page 299 of 299


-------