.tfto St** UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
% REGION 5
£ \ 77 WEST JACKSON BOULEVARD
I VM/V I CHICAGO, IL 60604-3590
jf
CIRCLE SMELTING CORPORATION SITE
RISK EVALUATION ADDENDUM FOR
RESIDENTIAL AND INDUSTRIAL AREAS
November 1, 1995
Prepared by: Patricia Van Leeuwen
U.S. EPA Toxicologist
Region V
Reviewed by:
Ramon Torres
U.S. EPA Remedial Project Manager
Region V
-------
CIRCLE SMELTING CORPORATION SITE
RISK EVALUATION ADDENDUM FOR
RESIDENTIAL AND INDUSTRIAL AREAS
Introduction
This Risk Evaluation Addendum presents the results of the
preliminary risk evaluation for Circle Smelting Corporation (CSC)
Site in Beckemeyer, Illinois. The main purpose of this addendum
is to explain, clarify, and identify potential human health risks
associated with CSC site. The United States Environmental
Protection Agency(EPA) has identified soil lead contamination as
the principal environmental problem associated with the site.
This addendum is divided into two sections: addendum l and
addendum 2.
Addendum 1 explains the potential human health risk associated
with the contamination on residential areas. Site specific data
(i.e., residential soil samples, in-house dust samples, lead-
based paint samples and water samples) were used as principal and
supported data for this addendum. This addendum includes a
description of the overall approach that EPA adopted to conduct
this evaluation. All considerations used in this addendum are
detailed described. Finally, a recommendation about which soil
lead cleanup concentration is more rational and acceptable by
EPA.
Addendum 2 explains the rationale used to develop a risk for a
non-residential (adult) exposure population associated with the
CSC site. In this addendum EPA also describes the overall
approach as well as the basic methodology used to develop the
minimum exposure at an industrial scenario. A recommendation
about the risk-based goal for concentration of lead in soil at
commercial areas is also provided.
This Risk Evaluation Addendum also intends to response the health
comments received during the public comment period for the
Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis for CSC site. This addendum
considered in the best way possible all the concerns from the
Potentially Responsible Party (ASARCO) as expressed through
Kleinfelder, Inc.
1
-------
Addendum 1
EXPANDED RESIDENTIAL SOIL EVALUATION
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency reviewed the
section titled "Development of the Lead PRG Using the
Uptake/Biokinetic Model" presented as Attachment B of the
Engineering Evaluation and Cost Analysis (EE/CA) Report for the
Circle Smelting Corporation Site, Beckemeyer, Illinois, which was
prepared by CH2M Hill in April 1994, and found the risk
evaluation to be seriously lacking. EPA then reexamined the data
for the site and prepared a new risk assessment, evaluating the
data incorporated in the EE/CA Report and from a new set of data
collected during a confirmatory sampling round in Beckemeyer in
September 1995. Expanded analyses were made using version 0.99d
of the Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic Model for Lead in
Children (IEUBK Model). These expanded analyses are presented in
this Addendum.
Overall Approach
The main source of lead contamination in the Village of
Beckemeyer is cinder waste which has been used in the
construction of walkways, driveways and alleys. Additionally,
isolated spots of cinder waste, sometimes even containing
retorts, have been found where fill was needed as backfill
against a foundation or in other areas in the yard. These latter
deposits are most worrisome as it is not always possible to
predict where such areas are located. A few residential
properties are reported to have had extensive application of fill
material during development.
EPA approached the problem of determining a safe level of
lead in soil for residential properties at the Circle Smelting
Corporation Site by looking at the question in a step-wise
manner. EPA first determined what level of lead in soil might be
acceptable if exposure to a child under the age of seven by
incidental ingestion to an average concentration in residential
soil is considered. A child whose typical soil contact
concentration exceeds this level is predicted to have a greater
than acceptable risk. EPA next considered the problem of how to
determine a safe level of lead in residential soils if the
exposure to soil is uneven due to the presence of hot spots
(discrete areas in yards with tailing deposits containing
elevated levels of lead). EPA finally considered the additional
potential impact of ingestion of home-grown vegetables, which was
not taken into account in the above two evaluations.
2
-------
Data Review
In this Expanded Residential Soil Evaluation, EPA used the
data from primarily two data sets. The first set of data was
taken from Table A-l "Comprehensive Data Base", Appendix A of the
EE/CA and included data collected in sampling rounds of
residential properties on March 29, 1993 and May 17, 1993. The
March 29 data consists of 13 targeted soil samples, including one
duplicate sample, collected by the Technical Assistant Team (TAT)
contractor in Beckemeyer along walkways that generally displayed
a characteristic bright-green moss or algae growth and in alleys
with exposed slag. Twelve of the thirteen samples exceeded the
Illinois background level for lead in soil of 346 /zg/g (sampled
soil contained a lead concentration range of 1200 to 31,000
fig/g) . The May 17 data consists of 9 soil samples collected from
residential areas throughout Beckemeyer by U.S. EPA. These
samples were not targeted and range in lead concentration from
132 to 600 nq/g. These two sets of samples were combined in the
first analysis.
Recent sampling undertaken to characterize the lead
concentrations in soil, indoor dust, paint and water in a limited
number of residential properties provided the basis for exploring
alternate input values for the IEUBK Model in the expanded
evaluation. This data is included in Appendix A of this
Addendum: Environmental Sampling Project Report for Circle
Smelting, prepared by ecology and environment, inc., and in
Appendix B: Sampling Protocol and Laboratory Reports.
Initial Evaluation:
Use of IEUBK Model Using Input as Average Site Exposure
The first set of analysis were performed both to (1)
reexamine the probability for observing a blood lead level which
exceeds the health-based level of concern of 10 fig/dL in a child
living at a residential property in Beckemeyer and to (2)
generate a set of range-finding analyses which were omitted in
the April 1994 EE/CA Report. Model runs incorporated a range of
dust lead concentration to soil lead concentration ratios, in an
attempt to evaluate the sensitivity of this parameter value on
the outcome parameter.
EPA initially examined the potential for an adverse health
effect in children, based on the probability of an elevated blood
lead level, using the 1993 data presented in the EE/CA report and
the default values in the IEUBK Model, as the available site data
consisted primarily of targeted and non-targeted soil samples in
the residential area. However, a review of residential house
3
-------
dust samples collected by the Illinois Department of Public
Health in October 1994 (included as Appendix C) suggested that
the use of a lower value for the dust lead concentration to soil
lead concentration ratio might be more reasonable and might
better reflect the lead soil contamination pattern in the yard
soil. The house dust samples showed a lead concentration high of
602 /xg/g (living room) and an average of 276 fig/g for the two
rooms sampled. Targeted sampling of the yard in the March 1993
round indicated a soil lead concentration of 1200 ppm where
tailings were observed. This data indicated a lead dust to soil
ratio of 0.50 to 0.37, based on the above samples. EPA chose to
carry out their analysis using the input value of 0.5, given that
the calculated ratio reflected contributions to house dust from
the targeted area only and that other, less contaminated, areas
of the yard would also contribute to the house dust
concentration. An inspection of the home revealed that the
interior walls were paneled and woodwork was stained rather than
painted, suggesting no additional lead contribution from indoor
paint.
The input data and corresponding predicted geometric mean
blood lead levels using the targeted and non-targeted samples
from the 1993 data sets and a dust to soil ratio of 0.5, were
generated using the Multiple Source Analysis option for dust in
the IEUBK Model. The results are shown in Table 1. Default
values were used for other parameter inputs lacking data to
indicate that these values should be changed.
A range finding run using the same input values and a soil
lead concentration range of 350 to 600 fig/g was carried out using
the Multiple Runs Analysis option; the output indicated a risk
of exceeding the target blood lead level (ROE) of 3.45% to 13.64%
(shown in Figure 1 and Table 2). As a result of the range
finding runs, a focused run using a soil lead concentration range
of 380 to 420 fig/g was then carried out. This procedure
identified a soil lead concentration of 400 pg/g as the target
soil cleanup level. The results are shown in Figures 2 and 3 and
Table 3.
EPA also looked at the sensitivity of the lead dust
concentration to lead soil concentration ratio on the identified
lead soil cleanup level of 400 fig/g (Table 4) and had some
concern over using a value based on a single home sampling. EPA
requested that the TAT contractor collect a set of confirmation
samples of soil, house dust, paint and water in a number of
residential properties in Beckemeyer to provide more information
on this parameter and other potential sources of lead. Lead soil
and dust data from the Environmental Sampling Project Report are
summarized in Table 5.
4
-------
Further Evaluation:
Consideration of the Impact of Hot Spots on Child Exposure
The data from the additional samples collected at Beckemeyer
residences provided the basis for further evaluation of the soil
lead cleanup level identified in the previous section. In
addition, discussions and communications with the toxicologists
from Kleinfelder, Inc. (Appendix D: letter from Kleinfelder,
October 5, 1995) indicated that they had a number of concerns
over inputs EPA might use in the IEUBK Model to determine a safe
level of lead in soil when the exposure is in the form of
isolated hot spots rather than an average exposure to the soil in
the child's residential exposure unit. EPA considered these
comments carefully and explored several ways of incorporating
this uncertainty in the analysis. EPA also considered the
comments regarding the indoor soil and outdoor dust relationship
and the adjustment of the Geometric Standard Deviation (GSD) in
the Model in this Expanded Evaluation.
Consideration 1: Exposure Frequency to Tailings Deposits
EPA agrees with the Kleinfelder toxicologists that given the
presence of isolated areas of lead-contaminated fill materials in
the child's yard, a child may be exposed to and ingest some soil
which is less contaminated and some which is more contaminated
with lead. EPA also agrees that the use of an average yard soil
lead concentration may not only be impractical to use, but also
may not be sufficiently protective of the child's health because
extremely high levels of lead may be diluted out. The goal of
any analysis would seem to be to set a cleanup level for lead
above which hot spot areas of lead would be addressed rather than
to set a level not to be exceeded as a yard average (or front
yard or backyard average), which in some cases may result in
remediation of extensive areas of the yard where elevated lead
levels are not found.
EPA believes that any meaningful evaluation must consider
some exposure to contaminated soil at the level of concern and
some exposure to soil which is less contaminated. This is not an
easy task as the varying play activities and behavioral patterns
of children who might reside at the residence must be considered.
Given the uncertainty in making such predictions, EPA decided
to consider a range of exposure frequencies in this evaluation.
Based on the data from the September 1995 sampling round and
comments received from the Kleinfelder toxicologists, EPA
considered a range of exposure frequencies to hot spots which
5
-------
included 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% of a child's outdoor play area.
The higher values were included with the consideration that if a
residential yard was considered to be "safe", picnic areas, small
pools and other play equipment might inadvertently be placed over
a hot spot area, causing the child's significant outdoor exposure
to be the in area of the hot spot.
The child's soil ingestion rate was not adjusted as there
was no reason to believe that the soil ingestion rate was lower
in a Beckemeyer. Rather, the concern was over the lead
concentration in the soil usually contacted. The balance of the
child's exposure was considered to come from ingestion of soil
containing a site-specific background lead concentration. The
latter was calculated by averaging all soil samples from the
September 1995 data set which are equal to or less than the
Illinois average value; ten samples were available for use in
this calculation and provided an arithmetic mean background value
for the area of 158 fiq/g, with a 95th percentile upper confidence
limit of 284 /zg/g. A value of 160 fig/g was used as the
background concentration in this analysis.
Using the rationale that a "safe soil exposure
concentration" (SSEC) is the level at which a child would not
have greater than a 5% probability of exceeding the target blood
lead level of 10 /xg/dL, the following equation was used in the
IEUBK Model runs to calculate the target soil lead cleanup
concentration:
SSEC = x % (TSCC) + (1-x) % (BC)
where x = frequency of exposure to hot spot areas
TSCC = Target Soil Cleanup Concentration
BC = Background Concentration
The IEUBK Model was run to determine the SSEC and then the
Target Soil Cleanup Concentration was calculated using the
equation.
Consideration 2: Relationship Between Indoor Dust and Outdoor
Soil Lead Concentrations
The ratio of the indoor dust lead concentration to soil lead
concentration is a sensitive parameter in the IEUBK Model. This
ratio in the Model can be understood as the ratio between indoor
dust lead concentrations and the soil lead concentrations usually
contacted by a child.
6
-------
No indication of a lowered transport of soil indoors is
shown in Beckemeyer. However, when a yard has hot spots, the
question arises: How much does the hot spot influence the indoor
dust concentration in comparison with cleaner parts of the yard?
EPA anticipates that the ratio between dust lead concentrations
and soil levels will be quite variable among houses, reflecting
the different patterns of yard use and play activities of the
residents. More specifically it can be anticipated that in those
residences where children are in regular contact with the hot
spot soils, these soils will be tracked into the home and will
affect indoor dust levels. To reflect this relationship we
assume that the soil usually contacted by a child and the soil
transported into the home will have similar lead concentrations.
EPA examined the lead levels in the soil in the grassy, play
and bare areas and in the indoor dust collected in the September
1995 sampling. These samples reflected the lead concentrations
in both targeted and non-targeted areas of the yard. As it was
learned that the house dust samples had been sieved, comparisons
with the values from the sieved soil lead analyses were made in
order to evaluate the relationship between the indoor dust and
outdoor soil lead concentrations. EPA subsequently learned that
dust samples from homes RH 5 and RH 9, which had been cleaned
only the day before the samples were taken, could not be sieved.
The laboratory reported that lead analysis on these two samples
was performed on hair balls, carpet fibers and such. The lead
concentration in these samples was 37.7 and 15.9 fig/g of debris,
respectively. These two samples were removed from the analysis.
The ratio of the dust lead concentration to soil lead
concentration was examined when (1) a 3:1 or 3:1:1 ratio of
exposure to the grassy area and the bare and/or play areas was
considered, (2) a 1:1 or 1:1:1 ratio of exposure to the grassy
area and the bare and/or play areas was considered and (3) using
only the contribution to indoor dust from the bare or play areas.
EPA also looked at the site use pattern for each residential
property. These calculations are shown in Table 6. The ratios
thus obtained indicated that at values which represent a
frequency of exposure of 25%, 50% and 100% to the bare areas,
which exhibited elevated lead levels in four of the six samples
used in the analysis, the dust lead concentration to soil lead
concentration ratio varied from a mean of 0.60 to 0.945.
EPA was aware that it is likely that this sampling event did
not result in the collection of samples of the most lead
contaminated soil or the least lead contaminated soil in each
yard. We additionally recognized that such a small number of
samples were inadequate to completely characterize the lead
movement from outdoor sources to indoor dust. However, this
analysis did demonstrate that the lead dust in the outdoor
environment is highly mobile, and that indoor lead concentrations
could reflect outdoor lead levels, especially if outdoor play is
7
-------
concentrated in small areas of the yard. The data further
suggest that the activity of pets may also affect this ratio.
In recognition of the factors which affect the dust to soil
ratio, the default assumption that the dust concentration is 70%
of the soil concentration (as contacted by a child) remains
reasonable and is consistent with site data. However, the usual
concentration of lead in soil both as contacted by the child and
as transported into the house may be less than the hot spot
concentration. This possibility is reflected in the analysis by
not only varying the contact fraction, but including a
sensitivity analysis to reflect the sensitivity of the calculated
target soil lead cleanup concentration to the dust to soil ratio.
The ratios as used in these Model runs represent the ratio
of the indoor dust concentration to the safe soil exposure
concentration (SSEC), not to the Target Soil Cleanup Level.
Thus, the higher ratios are not overly conservative in this
analysis.
Consideration 3: Use of an Alternate 6SD Value
The GSD as used in the IEUBK Model is a measure of the
relative variability in blood lead of a child of a specified age,
or children from a hypothetical population, whose lead exposures
in a specified dwelling are known. Children the same age having
identical concentrations of lead in their immediate environment
have different blood lead levels. The inter-individual GSD
represents the variability remaining after environmental and age
variability have been taken into account, and reflects
differences in the amount of time a child spends outdoors, what
he/she does when he/she is outdoors, how often he/she puts
his/her hands in his mouth, whether he/she has siblings and pets
which contribute lead dust to his/her indoor exposure, biological
diversity, differences in food intake, sampling and analytical
error and other sources of variability. As explained in the
Guidance Manual for the IEUBK Model (EPA 1994), because the GSD
value reflects child behavior, biokinetic variability and
measurement variability, unless there are great differences in
child behavior and biokinetic variability among different sites,
the GSD values should be similar for all sites, and site-specific
GSD values should not be needed. The default value used in the
IEUBK Model is 1.6; this value is based on estimates of GSD for
several mining and smelter sites ranging from 1.30 to 1.79
(Marcus 1992).
When a proper blood lead study has been conducted at a
site and adequate data on the blood lead levels and environmental
exposures of the children in the area are available, it is
sometimes useful to examine the site-specific GSD. Such data is
8
-------
not usually available, and appropriate use of the IEUBK Model
does not require that site-specific blood lead data be available.
While a blood lead screening study was carried out in Beckemeyer
(IDPH, 1994), no blood lead/environmental lead study of children
was conducted at this site. However, because EPA considered a
range of exposure frequencies to hot spots in the residential
units in this analysis, we believed that it would be useful to
examine a range of GSD values as well. While it was considered
that outdoor exposure that was restricted to highly contaminated
areas might result in values near the default value or even
lower, exposure scenarios which considered only a portion of the
child's exposure to the more contaminated areas would incur more
variability between children. Therefore, the lower GSD values
were used in conjunction with greater exposure frequencies to hot
spot areas in this analysis, while the higher GSD values were
considered where the exposure was more variable.
Results of Further Evaluations
The results of the further analyses to determine an
appropriate Target Soil Lead Cleanup Level for the residential
properties are shown as a matrix in Table 7: Calculated Target
Soil Lead Cleanup Levels. The matrix is useful because it
encompasses a range of child exposure scenarios and accompanying
uncertainties. The target soil lead cleanup values presented in
the table range from 140 to 1180 fig/g. However, a more
reasonable range might be 280 to 980 /xg/g, with an intermediate
value of 500 to 525 ng/g. In addition, it should be remembered
that a mean soil lead background level was used in this analysis
rather than the 95th percentile upper confidence limit on the
mean. Therefore, some yards showed a higher background
concentration for lead, making the choice of a more elevated
target soil lead cleanup level less protective.
Additional Impact of Ingestion of Home Grown Vegetables
EPA was further concerned at the Beckemeyer Village site
over the large number of gardens they and the TAT contractors
observed in resident's yards. While examination of the gardens
revealed that the most frequently grown crops appeared to be
tomatoes, corn, peppers, squash and other vegetables which are
less likely to accumulate excessive levels of lead, EPA was
aware that ingestion of home-grown vegetables can be one of the
most significant exposure pathways for lead for the child.
Lacking site-specific data on the frequency of ingestion of home-
grown vegetables and lead concentrations in vegetables in
Beckemeyer, EPA reviewed the data on lead incorporation in
vegetables collected at other Superfund sites.
9
-------
Data from the Midvale Community Lead Study, conducted by the
Department of Environmental Health, University of Cincinnati
Medical Center personnel, July 1990, indicated that 35.3 % of
Midvale residents have gardens, and that crops showed elevated
lead levels (geometric mean = 23 ppm; range = 2 to 140 ppm; N =
69). In the Baseline Risk Assessment for the Sharon
Steel/Midvale Tailings site, the potential impact of consuming a
diet which contained 14.2 % of the total vegetable intake and
predicted lead concentrations in leafy, vine, and root crops of
0.93, 0.23 and 0.93 ng/g wet weight (based on a soil lead
concentration of 460 mg/kg) were evaluated. In Appendix A,
Recommended Health-Based Soil Action Levels for Residential
Soils, for the site an action level of 500 mg/kg was recommended
to protect children at a target blood lead level of 12.5 /zg/dL,
assuming no lead intake from home-grown vegetables. The document
suggested that lead concentrations in gardens would have to be
much lower, in the range of 150-200 mg/kg, to protect children
whose families depend heavily on home-grown vegetables.
Investigations of the health impact of ingestion of
contaminated home-grown vegetables at a Midwestern site in Jasper
County, Missouri, which is more similar to Beckemeyer, indicated
that approximately 5% of those resident's vegetable consumption
came from home-grown vegetables. Lead concentrations of 0.62
fig/g and 2.1 (ig/g were found in samples of non-root and root
vegetables, respectively. Data and discussion from all three
reports in included in Appendix E.
EPA performed a range-finding run using as inputs into the
IEUBK Model a dust to soil lead concentration ratio of 0.5 and
the alternate dietary input option, in which 5.0% of the home-
grown vegetable consumption was considered to come from
vegetables which contain 0.62 fig/g of lead. The results of a
range-finding run are shown in Figure 4 and Table 8. These Model
runs suggest that a soil cleanup level between 300 and 350 mg/kg
might be needed to protect children whose families depend on
home-grown vegetables in Beckemeyer. The consideration of the
potential impact of this additional exposure pathway for children
would lend support for the choice of a target soil lead cleanup
level at the lower end of the range of values presented in Table
7.
Recommendations
The removal action recommended in the EE/CA required a
cleanup level which will be protected to human health and the
environment as well as be an indicator for the amount of soil to
be removed. The cleanup level should be based on the risk that a
contaminant represent to the population directly affected. In
view of this, EPA conducted a risk evaluation based on
site specific data (i.e., soil, dust, lead-based paint, water),
10
-------
risk exposure scenarios, IUEBK model runs, sensitivity analysis
and scientific considerations. The complexity of the site with
respect to the extent of contamination in the residential areas
("hot spot" locations) makes the determination of the cleanup
number very difficult. EPA reviewed and analyzed all the data
and concerns and determined that a range between 500 and 525 ppm
is the most appropriate and reasonable value for this site. This
range lies between the frequency exposure to hot spots of 0.25,
0.50, 0.75, and 1.0 with a dust lead concentration/ soil lead
concentration ration of 0.5 to 0.7. The 500-525 range satisfies
all the possible combinations in the exposure scenarios used in
this addendum. Choosing a higher number or lower number may lead
us into an under or over estimate of the risk. EPA believes that
the 500 ppm number chosen as a preliminary remediation goal in
the EE/CA is appropriate.
References
Illinois Department of Public Health. 1994. Results of IDPH
September 1993 Beckemeyer Area Blood Lead Screening.
Unpublished.
Marcus, AH. 1992. Use of site-specific data in models for lead
risk assessment and risk management. In: An Update of Exposure
and Effects of Lead. B. Beck, ed. Fundamental Applied
Toxicology 1&: 10-16.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S.EPA). 1994a. Software
for the Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic Model for Lead in
Children (IEUBK) version 0.99d.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S.EPA). 1994b.
EPA/540/R-93/081. Guidance Manual for the Integrated Exposure
Uptake Biokinetic for Lead in Children. Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response.
11
-------
TABLES
Site Exposure Using Input as Average Site Exposure
Range Finding Run for Soil Lead Cleanup
Concentration
Focused Run Soil Lead Cleanup Concentration
Sensitivity Analysis:
Dust Lead to Soil Lead Concentration Ratio
Summary: From Table 3-1 E&E Report;
Lead Analytical Results/Circle Smelting Site
Calculated Ratio of Dust Lead Concentration to
Soil Lead Concentration
Target Soil Lead Cleanup Concentrations
Range Finding Run for Soil Lead Cleanup
Concentration
-------
Table 1: Site Exposure Using Input as Average Site Exposure
Input Data:
Header line 1> CIRCLE SMELTER DATA FROM MARCH 1993; ADD MAY 1993
Header line 2> SOIL TO DUST RATIO OF 0.5 FROM BEAN DATA
3 >
ID FAM BLOCK AGE
PBS
PBD
PBW
PBA
ALT
1
S-l
RESIDENTIAL
18
4800
2410
4.0
0 .1
0 . 0
2
S-2
RESIDENTIAL
18
6600
3310
4 . 0
0 .1
0.0
3
S-3
RESIDENTIAL
18
8700
4360
4.0
0 .1
0.0
4
S-4
RESIDENTIAL
18
6600
3310
4.0
0.1
0.0
5
S-5
RESIDENTIAL
18
1200
610
4.0
0.1
0.0
6
S-6
RESIDENTIAL
18
4300
2160
4.0
0 .1
0 . 0
7
S-l
RESIDENTIAL
18
25000
12510
4.0
0.1
0.0
8
S-8
RESIDENTIAL
18
7700
3860
4.0
0.1
0.0
9
S-9
RESIDENTIAL
18
31000
15510
4.0
0.1
0.0
10
S-10
RESIDENTIAL
18
8000
4010
4.0
0.1
0.0
11
S-ll
RESIDENTIAL
18
1400
710
4.0
0.1
0.0
12
A10-1
RESIDENTIAL
18
600
310
4.0
0.1
0.0
13
A2-2
RESIDENTIAL
18
102
61
4.0
0.1
0.0
14
A3 -3
RESIDENTIAL
18
509
264
4.0
0.1
0.0
15
A5-5
RESIDENTIAL
18
147
84
4.0
0.1
0.0
16
A6-6
RESIDENTIAL
18
250
135
4.0
0.1
0.0
17
A7-7
RESIDENTIAL
18
179
100
4.0
0.1
0.0
18
A8-8
RESIDENTIAL
18
132
76
4.0
0.1
0.0
19
All-1
RESIDENTIAL
18
201
110
4.0
0.1
0.0
20
Al-1
RESIDENTIAL
18
298
159
4.0
0.1
0 . 0
Results of IEUBK Model Run:
ID
FAM
BLK
AGE
SOIL
DUST
WATER
AIR
PAINT
PBB
PRED
mon
ug/g
ug/g
ug/L
ug/m3
ug/day
ug/dL
ug/dL
1
000
000
18
4800.0
2410.0
4.0
0.10
0.0
29.66
2
000
000
18
6600.0
3310.0
4.0
0.10
0.0
_ _ _
35.44
3
000
000
18
8700.0
4360.0
4.0
0.10
0.0
_ _ _
41.29
4
000
000
18
6600.0
3310.0
4.0
0.10
0.0
— _ —
35.44
5
000
000
18
1200.0
610.0
4.0
0.10
0.0
~ —
12.54
6
000
000
18
4300.0
2160.0
4.0
0.10
0.0
_ _ _
27.86
7
000
000
18
25000.0
12510.0
4.0
0.10
0.0
- — _
75.34
8
000
000
18
7700.0
3860.0
4.0
0.10
0.0
_ _ _
38.60
9
000
000
18
31000.0
15510.0
4.0
0.10
0.0
— — _
85.65
10
000
000
18
8000 . 0
4010.0
4.0
0.10
0.0
_ _ _
39.42
11
000
000
18
1400.0
710.0
4.0
0.10
0.0
_ _ _
13 .90
12
000
000
18
600.0
310.0
4.0
0.10
0.0
- — •
7.82
13
000
000
18
102.0
61.0
4.0
0 .10
0.0
_ _ _
2.91
14
000
000
18
509.0
264.0
4.0
0.10
0.0
_ _ _
7.00
15
000
000
18
147.0
84.0
4.0
0.10
0.0
— — —
3 .41
16
000
000
18
250.0
135.0
4.0
0.10
0.0
— _ _
4.49
17
000
000
18
179.0
100.0
4.0
0.10
0.0
...
3.75
18
000
000
18
132 . 0
76.0
4.0
0.10
0.0
— — —
3 .24
19
000
000
18
201.0
110 . 0
4 . 0
0.10
0 . 0
_ _ _
3.98
20
000
000
18
298.0
159. 0
4.0
0.10
0.0
4.98
-------
Table 2: Range Finding Run for Soil Lead Cleanup Concentration
Overlay Plot
Soil Lead
Concentration
(ug/g)
Probability of
Exceeding 10 ug/dL
(percent)
1
350
3 .45
2
392
4 . 70
3
433
6.03
4
475
7.75
5
517
9.36
6
558
11.30
7
600
13 . 64
-------
Table 3: Focused Run for Soil Lead Cleanup Concentration
Overlay Plot
Soil Lead
Concentration
(ug/g)
Probability of
Exceeding 10 ug/dL
(percent)
1
380
4 .15
2
387
4 .42
3
393
4 . 70
4
400
5 . 00
5
407
5.00
6
413
5.32
7
420
5.67
-------
Table 4: Sensitivity Analysis
Dust Lead to Soil Lead Concentration Ratio
Ratio
Dust Lead/
Soil Lead
Target
Soil Lead
Cone
(ug/g)
Blood Lead
Cone
G. Mean
(ug/dL)
Risk of
Exceeding
10 ug/dL
0 .1
400
3.8
1.76
0.3
400
4.2
3 .05
0 . 5
400
4.7
5.00
0 . 7
400
5.1
7.28
0 . 9
400
5.5
9.36
-------
Table 5: Summary: From Table 3-1 EfcE Report
Lead Analytical Results / Circle Smelting Site
Soil Sample Area
Grassy
Play
Bare
House Dust
RH1
151
-
291
465
RH2
402
-
497
268
RH3
453
-
174
115
RH4
-
-
5240
-
RH5
376
-
356
37.7
RH6
166
-
2325
178
RH7
227
519
1720
508
RH8
185
-
903
244
RH9
32.4
-
153
15.9
RH10
13 .2
2400
1090
-
RH11
59.8
-
83.9
-
RH12
189
-
-
-
* All results from 100 mesh (150 um) screen sample
reported as mg/kg
-------
Table 6:
Calculated Ratio of Dust Lead Cone to Soil Lead Cone
(All data points)
(1) Using 3:1 or 3:1:1 ratio of grassy:play:bare areas for soil
(Based on comments by Dr. Tsuji that smelter waste covered
only 25% of the yard; see Response to Comments regarding
Kleinfelder's Review of the EE/CA, dated 07/13/95, page 8) .
RH1 465/186 = 2.50
RH2 268/425.75 = 0.63
RH3 115/383.25 = 0.30
RH5 37.7/371 = 0.10
RH6 178/705.75 = 0.25
RH7 508/584 = 0.87
RH8 244/364.5 = 0.67
RH9 15.9/62.55 = 0.25
mean (all pts) = 0.70
mean (-5,9) ¦ 0.87
(2) Using 1:1 or 1:1:1 ratio of grassy:play:bare areas for soil
RH1 465/221 = 2.10
RH2 268/449.5 = 0.60
RH3 115/313.5 = 0.37
RH5 37.7/366 - 0.10
RH6 178/1245.5= 0.14
RH7 508/822 = 0.62
RH8 244/544 = 0.45
RH9 15.9/92.7 = 0.17
mean (all pts) = 0.57
mean (-5,9) » 0.71
(3) Using play area and bare areas for soil
RH1
465/291
1.60
RH2
268/497
0.54
RH3
115/174
0.66
RH5
37.7/356 =
0.11
RH6
178/2325 =
0.08
RH7
508/1119.5=
0.45
RH8
244/903
0.27
RH9
15.9/153 =
0.10
mean (all pts)
mean (-5,9)
-------
(4)
Using Site Use Pattern
to determine
soil input
value
RH7
3+ children>
play
area
508/519
= 0.98
RH1
bare near house>
bare
area
465/291
= 1.60
RH2
dog/ ditto
bare
area
268/497
= 0.54
RH3
2 dogs >
bare
area
115/174
= 0.66
mean
(7/1-3)
- 0.945
RH6
no sm child/pets>bare
area
178/2325
= 0.08
RH8
no sm child/pets>bare
area
244/903
= 0.27
mean (6,8) » 0.18
Not used in analysis:
RH5 aged res/no pets>bare area 37.7/356 = 0.11
RH9 new carpet/renovate>bare 15.9/153 = 0.10
Indoor house dust levels appear to reflect the
individual site use:
Older residents with no pets have the lowest dust to
soil lead concentration ratio of 0.18.
Residents with pets and/or bare areas in close
proximity to entrance areas have house dust to bare area
soil ratios which are greater than 0.9.
The single home with many children has a dust to play
area soil ratio of approximately 1.0.
-------
Table 7 Target Soil Lead Cleanup Concentrations (ug/g)*
Frequency of
Exposure to
GSD
Dust Lead Cone/Soil Lead Cone Ratio
Hot Spots
0.3
0.5
0.7
1.0
0.25
1.80
900
700
540
380
2 .00
520
380
280
140
1.40
1180
980
820
660
0.50
1.60
800
640
540
420
1.80
530
430
350
270
1.40
840
710
600
495
0.75
1.60
590
480
415
335
1.80
410
340
290
235
1.00
1.40
670
570
490
410
1. 60
480
400
350
290
* Where
Soil Bkg = 160 ug lead/gm (arithmetic mean)
Indoor Dust Lead Cone = Ratio x Safe Soil Exposure Cone
Safe Soil Exposure Cone =
x % (Target Soil + (1-x) % (Soil
Cleanup Cone) Bkg)
-------
Table 8: Range Finding Run for Soil Lead Cleanup Concentration
Overlay Plot
Soil Lead
Concentration
(ug/g)
Probability of
Exceeding 10 ug/dL
(percent)
1
200
1.99
2
250
3 .24
3
300
4 .70
4
350
6 .42
5
400
8.25
6
450
10.61
7
500
12.81
Assumptions: Dust Lead to Soil Lead Cone Ratio = 0.5
Alternate Diet Inputs:
Home-grown Vegetables = 0.62 ug Pb/g
5.0% of diet
-------
FIGURES
Figure 1
Range Finding Run for Soil Lead Cleanup
Concentration - 0.5
Figure 2
Range Finding Run for Soil Lead Cleanup
Concentration - 0.5
Figure 3 -
Target Lead Soil Cleanup Concentration for
Circle Smelting Site
Figure 4 -
Range Finding Run for Soil Lead Cleanup
Concentration - 0.5
-------
Figure 1:
Range Finding Run for Soil Lead Cleanup Concentration
Assumptions: dust Lead to Soil Lead Cone Ratio = 0.5
LEAD 0.9Sd
KHNCI-11 LHV
10 12 14 16 18
BLOOD LEflO CONCENTRATION < uo/dL)
8 to 84 Months
-------
Figure 2: Focused Run for Soil Lead Cleanup Concentration
Assumptions: Dust Lead to Soil Lead Cone Ratio = 0.5
i—i—r
Cutoff*: ie.0 ug/dL
Run l: 4.15*
Run 2: A.A2X
Run 3: A.70*
Run A- s.ee*
Run 5: 5.00*
Run 6: 5.32*
Run 7: 5.67*
LERD 0.SS
0 to OA Months
20
22
24
-------
Figure 3: Target Lead Soil Cleanup Concentration
for Circle Smelting site Based on Focused Run
-------
Figure 4: Range Finding Run for Soil Lead Cleanup Concentration
Assumptions: Dust Lead to Soil Lead Cone Ratio = 0.5
Alternate Diet Inputs:
Home-grown Vegetables = 0.62 ug Pb/g
5.0% of diet
S £
U
3 5
: S
i ;
li
t—'—i—>—r
Cutoff: le.e ugXdL
Run l: 1.39%
Run 2: 3.241
Run 3: 4.7BS
Run 4: 6.42S
Run 5: 8.2SX
Run 6: 10.6131
Run 7: 12.81*
LXRD B.SSd
HHN(iE?2 LHY
IB 18
BLOOD U»D CONCENTRflTIOH (ug/dL)
0 to 04 Months
22
24
-------
Addendum 2
REVISED ONSITE SOIL ASSESSMENT
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reviewed the
Engineering Evaluation and Cost Recovery (EE/CA) Report for the
Circle Smelting Corporation Site, Beckemeyer, Illinois, prepared
by CH2M Hill in April 1994 and found that the rationale for
choosing a soil lead cleanup value for the Circle Smelter Plant
site was not clearly presented. While prior guidance from the
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response did not provide
clear guidance for choosing a soil lead cleanup value for an non-
residential (adult) exposure population, the most recent guidance
(U.S.EPA, 1994) suggests the use of interim approaches until an
adult biokinetic model can be developed or adopted. For this
purpose EPA considered that it would be appropriate to perform a
more in-depth assessment of soil exposure at the Plant site using
tools which are currently available. This assessment is
presented in this Addendum.
Overall Approach
The Plant property has been used primarily for primary and
secondary zinc smelting operations. Smelter waste on the site
includes cinders from the coal combustion in the smelting process
and clinker waste materials and various forms of slag with high
levels of heavy metals (called cinders in this report). The high
lead content in the cinder waste is the focus of this evaluation.
The basis for this evaluation is that the Smelter Plant
property would in time be returned to use as a site for
commercial or industrial activities. Given the presence of
useful buildings onsite, future site use as a trucking or
warehouse facility was evaluated. The population of concern
was considered to be commercial or industrial workers, with the
pregnant woman (as a surrogate for the developing fetus) as the
target or most sensitive population. This assessment focuses
only on exposure to soil and dust and only by the ingestion
pathway. Exposure to other media (e.g., waste piles, sediments,
surface water, etc.) and exposure to soil and dust from other
pathways (e.g., dermal or inhalation of particulate) are not
considered in this assessment.
EPA recognizes that several approaches are available for
assessing the adverse health impacts of lead exposure to the
pregnant woman, including several biokinetic models (01Flaherty,
1991, 1993, 1995; Leggett, 1993); EPA has not conducted an in-
depth review of these methodologies. For this evaluation, EPA
chose to use the Leadville methodology, as described in a draft
Bageline Human Health Risk Assessment for the California Gulch
12
-------
Superfund Site. Part C. Screening Level Soil Concentrations for
Workers and Recreational Site Visitors Exposed to Lead and
Arsenic (included as Appendix F of the Addenda). This approach
is similar to the equation that was reviewed by the EPA Technical
Review Workgroup for Lead (TRW) and initially included in the
draft version of the OSWER directive on soil lead (U.S.EPA,
1994), and is substantially similar to the approach presented by
Bowers et al. (1994). The Leadville methodology allows the back
calculation of a soil remediation goal (that is, calculation of a
soil lead level associated with a given increment in blood lead
concentration). The calculations were performed to identify
lead concentrations in soil which would present a risk to workers
at the Plant site.
Focus on Target Blood Lead Level in a Pregnant Woman
This assessment focuses on the pregnant woman as the
population of principle concern because the pregnant woman may
have a greater dietary intake and a greater absorption of lead
than a non-pregnant woman or man, and because the developing
fetus of the pregnant woman is likely to be especially
susceptible to the adverse effects of lead.
While EPA has not yet issued formal guidance on the blood
lead level that is considered to be appropriate for protecting
the health of pregnant women or other adults, The Agency has made
the recommendation that there should be no more than a 5%
probability that a child aged six and younger would have a blood
lead level (PbB) greater than 10 /xg/dL (U.S.EPA, 1991) . Since
the exposed worker population at the Plant site could include
pregnant women, and because the developing fetus is exposed to
lead levels nearly equal to those of the mother, the health
criterion selected by EPA in this assessment is that there should
be no more than a 5% probability that the fetus of a pregnant
woman would have a PbB greater than 10 /ig/dL. Ten /ig/dL has also
been identified by the Committee on Measuring Lead Exposure in
Infants, Children and Other Sensitive Populations of the National
Research Council (NRC, 1993)as the concentration of concern for
the protection of the fetus.
The health goal recommended by EPA is equivalent to
specifying that the 95th percentile of the PbB distribution in
fetuses does not exceed 10 /zg/dL:
PbB95th fetal ^ 10 pig/dL
13
-------
Basic Methodology
The basic equation is similar to that used in the Part C:
Evaluation of Worker Scenario for the California Gulch Superfund
site. The basic equation is shown below.
PbB = PbBc + BKSF* C* IR* EF* AF
where:
PbB = Blood lead level ({lg/dL) in a population of
women exposed to lead-contaminated soil or
dust via occupational activities
PbB0 = "Baseline" blood lead level in women not
exposed to lead-contaminated soil via
occupational activities, but including other
background exposures
BKSF = Biokinetic slope factor (/xg/dL increase in blood
lead per /ig/day lead absorbed)
C = Arithmetic mean concentration (/xg/g) of lead in
soil or dust, averaged over the workplace
location where exposure occurs
Mean daily intake rate of soil or dust during
occupational activities in the areas of
contamination (g/day)
Exposure frequency (days/yr) to soil or dust
during occupational activities
Absolute absorption fraction (bioavailability)
of lead in soil or dust
For the calculation of the lead soil remediation level, this
equation can be rearranged to give the following equations:
RBRG = (PbBr^tarqet - PbB J
BKSF* (IR3* AF3 + K3d* IRd* ATd)
(P&&95th££tal)
14
IR
EF
AF
-------
PbBcutarget = IL
GSD1'645
where
RBRG = Risk-based goal for the arithmetic mean
concentration of lead in soil ifig/g) at
commercial areas where exposure occurs
PbBcM = Target geometric mean blood lead level (PbB)
in a population of pregnant women or women of
child-bearing age exposed to lead-
contaminated soil and dust via occupational
activities (^g/dL)
Ksd = Mass fraction of soil in indoor dust,
calculated as the increment in dust lead
concentration per unit concentration in soil
PbB95thfetal = 95th percentile PbB of the fetus in a
population of pregnant women exposed to
lead-contaminated soil and dust via
occupational activities (/xg/dL)
R = Mean ratio of fetal to maternal PbB
GSD - Individual geometric standard deviation of
PbB among a population of pregnant women or
women of child-bearing age exposed to lead-
contaminated soil and dust via occupational
activities at the site
Exposure Scenarios for the Onsite Assessment
Two exposure scenarios were considered to be reasonable for
the assessment of onsite soil exposure at the Circle Smelting
Plant. The first scenario is the exposure to a
secretary/receptionist working in a warehouse/trucking operation;
the second is the exposure to a laborer who works in a warehouse,
unloading boxes and/or operating equipment (i.e., small lift
truck). A woman of a child-bearing age is considered as a
possible employee for either scenario. However, the second
scenario was considered less likely to occur. This risk
evaluation therefore focused on the exposure to lead via
occupational activities for a woman employed as a
secretary/receptionist.
Input Parameters Used in this Risk Evaluation
15
-------
Target Blood Lead Concentration (PbBattarget)
The PbBcutarget is calculated using three parameters: the
95th percentile PbB of the fetus (PbB95th fetal) , the
fetal/maternal PbB ratio (R) and the GSD. The target fetal blood
lead level has been discussed in a proceeding section. The input
values for R and the GSD are discussed below.
Fetal/Maternal Blood Lead Level (R)
The value for the relationship between the fetal and
maternal blood lead concentration of 0.90 cited in the California
Gulch Report (Appendixes F and G) was considered to be
appropriate and was used in this risk evaluation.
Individual PbB Geometric Standard Deviation (GSD)
GSD values measured in populations (GSDP) reflect the
combined effect of 1) variability in the environmental lead
concentration, and 2) inter-individual variability in lead
exposures and lead biokinetic. The population GSD for women who
might work at future operations located on the Plant property
might provide an upper-bound for the individual GSD if it were
known; however this value cannot be determined. In fact, it not
even possible to know if future workers at the site would be
local residents of the area.
The estimates of a population GSD from the NHANES III survey
of PbB among the general U.S. population of adult women ranged
from 2.1 to 2.6 (Brody, 1995). This range of values could be
used as a potential range of input values for this risk
evaluation. However, it is possible that the values from the
NHANES III survey represent a more homogeneous exposure, and that
the use of such values could underestimate the GSD if the
potential women workers at the Plant site include some women who
have dietary exposure and some who have soil and dust exposures.
It is also possible that women in the Beckemeyer area may have a
more similar exposure to lead. EPA realizes the risk-based goal
(RBRG) calculation is sensitive to value used for the GSD.
Therefore, an input of 1.9, which represents a value
substantially lower than those in the NHANES III survey range and
which is more consistent with values seen at sites where this
parameter has been measured, was chosen for this risk evaluation.
The calculated PbBcMtarget for this risk evaluation is thus
10 uq/dL
PbBcMtarget = o.90 = 3.87/xg/dL
1 gl.645
16
-------
Background Blood Lead Level (PbB0)
The baseline PbB is intended to represent the best estimate
of the geometric mean blood lead level in adults not exposed to
lead-contaminated soil or dust associated with occupational
activities. No extensive database from which to determine a mean
baseline blood lead level is available for the population of
Beckemeyer women. The national estimate of PbB0 based on NHANES
III data for the general U.S. population of women is
approximately 2.1 /xg/dL (Pirkle, 1994); mean values of PbBc have
also been derived for blacks (2.2 jtig/dL) , Hispanics (2.0 /zg/dL)
and whites (1.7 /xg/dL) (Brody, 1994). Given the lack of
representative data for the site, a value of 1.7 pig/dL was used
in this risk evaluation.
Biokinetic Slope Factor (BKSF)
The BKSF parameter relates the PbB (/xg Pb/dL blood) to
dietary uptakes of lead (pigPb/day) . A detailed discussion of
this parameter was presented in the California Gulch worker
scenario evaluation report. The Technical Review Workgroup (TRW)
for lead analysis pointed out the value of 0.40 used in the
California Gulch assessment was highly dependent on the
assumptions made in analyzing the ingestion data of Pocock and
the value assigned to the oral absorption fraction (AF). For
this risk evaluation, EPA chose to use the value of 0.40 as cited
in the California Gulch Report and the accompanying increase in
the AF value (refer to section in the Oral Absorption Frequency).
Intake Rate for Soil and Dust (IR)
EPA's draft guidance Superfund's Standard Default Exposure
Factor for the Central Tendency and Reasonable Maximum Exposure
(U.S. EPA, 1993) gives an estimate if the central tendency value
for adult soil ingestion at 50 mg/day. The TRW for lead
committee conducted a review of adult lead ingestion data and is
in general agreement that 50 mg/day represents a reasonable
estimate of the central tendency of adult soil ingestion. The
Workgroup further noted that most studies do not differentiate
between environmental sources (outdoor soil or indoor dust) or
exposure scenarios.
Some proportioning of this parameter was undertaken in the
California Gulch assessment. However, the TRW pointed out that
Superfund guidance considers that the 50 mg/day value used for
adult soil ingestion for all chemicals of concern represents all
soil intake, whether directly from soil or indirectly through
contact with indoor dust. This value and its application in risk
assessment specifically applies to the mass of soil ingested and
not to a combined mass of soil and dust ingested. Following the
17
-------
rational presented in Review of the Methodology for Establishing
Risk-hased Soil Rpmediation Goals for Commercial Areas of the
California Gulch Site (Appendix G), EPA chose not to proportion
the ingestion rate for this risk evaluation and adopted the
single Superfund value of 50 mg/day as the adult ingestion rate
(IR) .
Mass Fraction o£ soil to Dust (K,d)
The California Gulch methodology required a value for the
mass fraction of outdoor soil reflected in indoor dust. In this
risk evaluation, EPA considered that no measurement of the soil
to dust transfer coefficient was available for use in a future
commercial land use of the Plant site. In addition, adopting the
simpler Superfund approach to the worker soil ingestion exposure,
EPA considered that the 50 mg/day ingestion value was intended to
specifically address situations where workers do not have
extensive direct contact with soils and, by inference, to
situations where dust ingestion would be expected to be a
relatively major pathway of soil exposure. In such situations,
the contaminant dust exposure concentration is not considered to
be significantly different from the soil exposure concentration.
Therefore, for this risk evaluation EPA used a Ksd value of 1.0.
Exposure Frequency (EF)
The exposure frequency of 250 days/year, which corresponds
to a normal five day work week with two weeks per year spent away
from the plant, was considered to be a reasonable exposure
frequency for this risk evaluation.
Oral Absorption Fraction (AF)
In the California Gulch assessment, the methodology for
estimating this parameter combined two adsorption factors : 1)
the absorption of lead from ingested food and water, and 2) the
absorption of lead from soil or dust relative to the absorption
from food or water. A value of 10% (0.10) was initially used to
represent the adult oral absorption of lead from food and water.
The value was subsequently adjusted to 20% (0.20) to account for
the possible increased absorption during pregnancy and a number
of uncertainties outlined in the TRW for Lead Committee review.
The California Gulch Report also utilized a value of 60% (0.60)
for the relative absorption of lead from soil and dust, based on
studies of the bioavailability of the site-specific soil lead in
immature swine. The AF was thus estimated as 0.12 (0.20 x 0.60)
for the population of women of child-bearing age in Leadville,
CO. While the Colorado site-specific value of 0.6 is likely to
18
-------
be an underestimate for the cinder material found in Beckemeyer,
EPA elected to use the value of 0.12 for the oral absorption
fraction in this risk evaluation.
Calculation of the Risk-Based Remediation Goal (RBRG)
for the Circle Smelting Plant Site
The input values employed in this risk evaluation are
summarized in the following table. A calculation of the RBRG to
protect a pregnant woman or woman of child-bearing age in a
worker scenario at the Circle Smelting Site is also presented.
TABLE OF INPUT PARAME1
"ER VALUES
PARAMETER
REASONABLE VALUE
INPUT VALUE
PbB95thfetal
10.00
10.00
R
0.90 - 1.00
0.90
GSD
2.10 - 2.60
1.90
PbBcMtarget
2.31 - 3.28
3.28
PbB0
1.7 - 2.1
1.7
BKSF
0.40 - 0.80
0.40
IR
0.050 - 0.100
0.050
K3d
1.0
1.0
EF
250
250
AF
0.10 - 0.30
0.12
Calculation of the Risk-Based Soil Lead Remediation Goal:
Equation:
RBRG - (PbB^target - PbBJ
BKSF* (IRS* AFS + Kad* IV ATd)
(PbB«,>fetal)
PbBontarget = r
gsd1-"5
(3.87 - 1.7)
RBRG - (0.40) (0.050) (250) (1.0) (0.12)
(365)
19
-------
RBRG m 1,320 fig/g = 1,320 ppxn
Recommendations
The removal action recommended in the EE/CA for the Smelter
facility required a cleanup level which will be protective to
human health. This cleanup level should be based on risks,
associated with the contaminant present at this facility, present
to the population directly affected (i.e., secretary/receptionist
working in a warehouse/trucking operation, a laborer who works in
a warehouse, unloading boxes and/or operating equipment). In
view of this, EPA conducted this industrial risk evaluation based
on specific scenarios and assumptions used at other Superfund
sites, such as California Gulch site. EPA adopted a similar
approach as in the California Gulch site, in order to generate
the industrial cleanup level of 1,300 ppm. EPA admits that this
cleanup level is based on a series of assumptions and inferences
that can create discussions; however, EPA believes that this is a
reasonable approach for this type of removal project.
20
-------
References
Bowers, TS, BD Beck and HS Karam. 1994. Assessing the
relationship between environmental lead concentrations and adult
blood lead levels. Risk Analysis 14: 183-189.
Brody, DJ, JL Pirkle, RA Kramer, KM Flegal, TD Matte, EW Gunter
and DC Paschal. 1994. Blood lead levels in the U.S. population.
Phase 1 of the third National Health and Nutrition Examination
Survey (NHANES III, 1988 to 1991). JAMA 272: 277-283.
Leggett, RW. 1993. An age-specific kinetic model of lead
metabolism in humans. Environ. Health Perspect. 1Q1: 599-615.
0'Flaherty, EJ. 1991. Physiologically-based models for bone-
seeking elements. III. Human sketal and bone growth. Toxicol.
Appl. Pharmacol. Ill: 332-341.
0'Flaherty, EJ. 1993. Physiologically-based models for bone-
seeking elements. IV. Kinetics of lead disposition in humans.
Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 11&: 16-29.
0'Flaherty, EJ. 1995. Physiologically-based models for bone-
seeking elements. V. :.ead absorption and disposition in
childhood. Toxicol. Ar?l. Pharmacol. in press.
Pirkle, JL, DJ Brody, EW Gunter, RA Kramer, DC Paschal, KM Flegal
and TD Matte. 1994. The decline in blood lead levels in the
United States. The National Health and Nutrition Examination
Surveys (NHANES). JAMA 272: 284-291.
National Research Council Committee on Measuring Lead in Critical
Populations, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology,
Commission on Life Sciences (NRC). 1993. Measuring Lead
Exposure in Infants. Children, and- Other Sensitive Populations.
National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S.EPA). 1989. Interim
Guidance on Establishing Soil Lead Cleanup Levels at Superfund
Sites. OSWER Directive #9355.4-02. Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S.EPA). 1991. Update on
OSWER Soil Lead Cleanup Guidance. Memorandum from Don. R. Clay,
August 29, 1991. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S.EPA). 1994. Revised
Interim Soil Lead Guidance for CERCLA Sites and RCRA Corrective
Action Facilities. OSWER Directive # 9355.4-12. Office of Solid
21
-------
Waste and Emergency Response.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). 1993.
Superfund'a Standard Default Exposure Factors for the Central
Tendency and RME. Working Draft. November 1993.
Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH). 1994. Results on
the IDPH September 1003 Beckemeyer Areas Blood Lead Screening.
Unpublished.
Marcus, AH. 1992. Use of site-specific data in models for lead
risk assessment and risk management. IN: An Update of Exposure
and Effects on Lead. Beck, B. Fundamental Applied Toxicology. 18:
10-16.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) . 1994a. Software
for the Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic Model for Lead in
Children (IEUBK) version 0.99d.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). 1994b.
EPA/540/R-93/081. Guidance Manual for the Integrated Exposure
Uptake Biokinetic for Lead in Children. Office od Solid Waste
and Emergency Response.
22
-------
APPENDIXES
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Appendix D
Appendix E
Appendix F
Appendix G
Appendix H
Appendix I
Environmental Sampling Project Report: Circle
Smelting Corporation Site, Beckemeyer, Illinois
Sampling Protocols, Laboratory's Correspondences
and Reports
Illinois Department of Public Health Residential
In-House Dust Sampling Results.
Correspondence from Kleinfender, Inc., dated
October 5, 1995
Part 1. Midvale Community Lead Study, Final
Report, July 1990
Part 2. Recommended Health-Based Soil Action
Levels for Residential Soils for the
Sharon Steel/Midvale Site
Part 3. Area-Wide Human Health Risk Assessment
for the Jasper County Site
Baseline Human Health Risk Assessment for
California Gulch Site
Review of the Methodology for Establishing Risk-
Based Soil Recommendation Goals for Commercial
Areas of the California Gulch Site.
Correspondences from ASARCO, dated July 13, 1995
and from Kleinfender, Inc., dated July 11, 1995
References (articles only)
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page
1 INTRODUCTION 1-1
2 FIELD SAMPLING SUMMARY 2-1
2.1 BACKGROUND 2-1
2.2 SAMPLE COLLECTION 2-2
2.2.1 Soil Sample Collection 2-3
2.2.2 Interior Surface Dust Sample Collection 2-4
2.2.3 Drinking Water Sample Collection 2-5
2.2.4 In Situ Paint Analysis by XRF Instrumentation 2-6
2.3 SAMPLE LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS 2-6
2.4 SAMPLE TRACKING AND HANDLING 2-11
2.5 QUALITY CONTROL MEASURES 2-11
3 ANALYTICAL DATA SUMMARY 3-1
3.1 DATA QUALITY 3-1
3.2 DATA SUMMARY TABLES 3-2
Appendix Page
A PHOTODOCUMENTATION OF SAMPLE LOCATIONS A-l
B SAMPLING SUMMARY INFORMATION SHEETS B-l
C ANALYTICAL DATA PACKAGE C-l
D LETTER FROM DIRECTOR OF E & E ANALYTICAL SERVICES CENTER D-l
E ADDITIONAL TESTING RESULTS E-l
ii
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
3-1 Lead Analytical Results 3-3
3-2 Percent by Mass Through 100-Mesh Screen 3-5
3-3 Dust and Lead Loading Results 3-6
iii
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure
r o- Page
1-l Site Location Map
^ 1-2
2-1 Sample Location Map
2-13
iv
-------
1. INTRODUCTION
The Circle Smelting Environmental Sampling Project was issued to Ecology and
Environment, Inc. (E & E), on June 30, 1995, under Technical Assistance Team (TAT)
Technical Direction Document (TDD) Number T05-9506-014. The United States Environ-
mental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), Region V, managed the overall direction of the
environmental sampling project. The environmental sampling activities, which were
conducted in Beckemeyer, Illinois (Figure 1-1), were a part of a study to determine the level
of lead contamination in soil, household dust, drinking water, and household paint within
several targeted areas. The derived analytical data will be used to determine whether environ-
mental factors attributable to the site have adversely impacted human health in the study area.
This report provides a summary of the environmental sampling efforts undertaken by
E & E as well as a description of activities and procedures used during sample collection.
This report also provides a discussion of the quality of the derived analytical data and presents
the data in a summary table.
1-1
-------
ecology and environment, inc.
Technical Assistance Team
Region V
111 W JacfcMn 0M1. cncago. ttt 60604
ILUNOtS
v:- ::
J
t
I
j TITLE
SITE LOCATION MAP
FIOURE# |
1-1
<
! 3ITE
CIRCLE SMELTING
SCALE
1:24,000
J
, CTTY
STATE
BECKEMEYER ILLINOIS
PAN
EIL0614RAA
SOURCE
USGS TOPOGRAPHICAL MAP, 7.5 MINUTE SERIES
DATE 10/1/94
I
BECKEMEYER. ILLINOIS QUADRANGLE
REVISED
1-2
-------
2. FIELD SAMPLING SUMMARY
The following is a description of the field sampling activities conducted by E & E.
2.1 BACKGROUND
The Circle Smelting Corporation formerly operated a zinc smelting process on a 41-
acre parcel of land in the village of Beckemeyer, Clinton County, Illinois. The Circle
Smelting (CS) site environmental sampling project encompasses the entire village.
The smelting facility began primary zinc smelting operations in 1904, under the
ownership of the Missouri Zinc Company. Primary zinc smelting operations continued into
the 1920s, when the facility was convened to a secondary zinc smelter. It was during the
primary zinc smelting operations that the smelter produced cinders containing heavy metals
that now contaminate the soils at the CS site. These cinders were used as an aggregate for
roads and sidewalks, surfacing material for alleyways, and as a fill material on both private
and public lands.
In addition to the first operator on site, Missouri Zinc Company, other owners have
included Clinton County Zinc Company, Five Inc., and the Federated Metals Division of the
American Smelting and Refining Company, Inc. (ASARCO). ASARCO used a Belgium
retort system for boiling zinc scrap in order to reclaim a reasonably pure zinc material.
Circle Smelting took over operations in 1965.
U.S. EPA assumed responsibility for the site in 1993, and conducted site assessments
and remedial investigations. Lead was detected in surficial soils of residential'property at
Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) contamination levels greater than the 5-
parts per million (ppm) regulatory limit.
2-1
-------
U.S. EPA determined that immediate removal actions became necessary when the
village of Beckemeyer proposed installation of a new water distribution system. The proposed
route would require excavation along residential front yards and across highly contaminated
city streets. The excavation of the pipeline route could lead to contamination of asphalt road
surfaces with highly contaminated lead dust and exposure of the local population to contami-
nated dust that would be liberated during excavation activities.
On March 22, 1994, the U.S. EPA Waste Management Division Director signed
Administrative Order V-W-'94-C-230, requiring respondents, Circle Smelting Corporation,
Federated Metals Corporation, and ASARCO, to conduct removal activities along the
proposed new water distribution route.
On May 16, 1994, the Potentially Responsible Parties' (PRPs') contractor began
removal actions under the oversight of U.S. EPA and TAT. Removal actions included
excavation and testing of soils to a depth of 2 feet along the entire pipeline route. An X-ray
fluorescence (XRF) unit was utilized to determine whether lead levels in the soil exceeded 500
ppm. Soils containing lead levels greater than 500 ppm were removed to the Circle Smelting
Corporation warehouse, while soils with levels below 500 ppm backfilled the pipeline trench.
The PRP removal actions were completed on August 25, 1994. The pipeline covered
over 49,000 linear feet, requiring excavation of 7,621 cubic yards of soil. Of the 7,621 cubic
yards of soil, 2,516 cubic yards contained lead at levels greater than 500 ppm. The 2,516
cubic yards was removed to the Circle Smelting Corporation warehouse for storage.
2.2 SAMPLE COLLECTION
On July 6 and 7, 1995, E & E accompanied the U.S. EPA Remedial Project Manager
(RPM), Ramon Torres, and Community Involvement Coordinator (CIC), Susan Pastor, to the
site area to contact the households and obtain access agreements prior to environmental
sampling.
On July 18 through July 20, 1995, the U.S. EPA RPM and E & E conducted
sampling at 12 households and four additional areas of concern (Figure 2-1). The following
sampling activities were planned for each residence:
• soil samples from the yard;
2-2
-------
• indoor household dust samples:
• drinking water samples; and
• analysis of indoor paint by XRF instrumentation.
The following sections describe activities and procedures conducted by E & E during
the course of the project. Photodocumentation of project activities is provided in Appendix
A.
2.2.1 Soil Sample Collection
E & E developed appropriate field sampling forms for each of the four sampling
media. Blank copies of these forms can be found in Appendix B, and completed field forms
are on file at E & E's Chicago office. At each residence, the E & E soil sampler made a
drawing of primary property features such as the building location, child play areas, vegeta-
tion, and other relevant information on the first page of the field form. The sampler also
checked descriptive boxes on the field form to describe additional features of the property.
E & E collected three composite soil samples from each household in the following
areas:
• play areas;
• bare areas or areas where tailings could be identified; and
• green areas where no tailings are present.
Each sample was composed of four aliquots obtained by choosing a center and
collecting an aliquot at 4 to 5 feet from the center in a cardinal pattern. An equal volume of
soil, excluding debris and undecomposed matter, was collected from each aliquot and placed
into a stainless steel bowl. The three sample locations were labeled on the property sketch.
E & E did not select aliquot locations within 3 feet of any structure.
After all four aliquot were collected, E & E thoroughly mixed the soil in the bowl
with a stainless steel spoon. After mixing, the composited soil was placed into precleaned 8-
2-3
-------
ounce glass sample containers that had been previously labeled with the applicable home
identification number.
Sampling equipment, including stainless steel bowls, corers. and spoons were
decontaminated after each home was sampled using an alkaline detergent solution mixed with
distilled water, a toothbrush scrubber, and a thorough rinse with pure distilled water.
Sample chain-of-custody was maintained for all samples as described in Section 2.3.
2.2.2 Interior Surface Dust Sample Collection
Because of the large sample size required for laboratory analysis (3 to 5 grams),
E & E used a standard portable Dustbuster™-type vacuum cleaner to collect interior surface
dust samples. E & E used a hand-held Sears Dynomite™ line current vacuum with an 18-foot
cord. Dust samples collected with the vacuum were shaken from the fabric filter into pre-
cleaned 4-ounce glass sample containers.
E & E determined that collecting dust from the required sampling areas in a home
was sufficient enough in most cases to obtain between 5 and 20 grams of the dust sample.
During the July 6 and 7, 1995, access agreement collections, all home owners were instructed
not to vacuum until samples were collected. In the Beckemeyer Elementary School, which
was particularly clean, E & E, upon informing U.S. EPA RPM, resorted to collection of dust
in areas of long-term accumulation such as bookshelves and fan blades.
Upon entering a home, the dust sampler used the project vacuum cleaner to vacuum
floors and window sills in bedrooms, the kitchen, and entryways that indicated use by any
children in the home and/or areas that were reported by the parent or child as being common
play areas. The vacuum was not opened or emptied until all areas had been sampled. In
order to obtain an adequate sample volume, E & E routinely sampled between 12 and 30
square feet in targeted areas. Dimensions of the areas vacuumed by the sampler were esti-
mated and recorded on sample information field forms (see Appendix B). In addition, the
sampler highlighted and labeled dust sampling areas on an interior sketch of the home to
document XRF reading locations.
Upon completion of sampling within a home, E & E carefully placed the accumulated
contents of the dust canister, including material that had adhered to the filter, into a pre-
cleaned 4-ounce glass sample jar that was labeled with the appropriate home identification
2-4
-------
number. E & E did not remove any hair, paint chips, bugs, or other debris that was obtained
during dust sampling activities in each home. The sampler wore a new pair of latex gloves
for each sample to remove the filter. After consolidation and/or mixing of samples did not
achieve adequate homogeneity, duplicate dust samples were not collected.
The interior of the vacuum dust collection canister was washed with an alkaline
detergent solution, triple-rinsed with deionized water, and wiped with a new. damp paper
towel to remove any residual dust after collection of each sample.
Sample chain-of-custody was maintained for all samples as described in Section 2.3.
2.2.3 Drinking Water Sample Collection
E & E provided the designated residents with two pre-labeled. 1-liter, precleaned
plastic bottles. The residents were instructed on how to collect the water sample in accor-
dance with U.S. EPA's Final Rule for Lead and Copper in Drinking Water (Federal Register.
June 7, 1991). The residents were verbally instructed to fill the first container from the cold
water household kitchen tap in the morning before :sing any other water source in the house
(i.e.. first draw); the second container volume was to be collected after the water ran for 20
minutes (i.e., a flush). No nitric acid preservative was placed in the plastic bottles until after
the samples were picked up by the sampling team. The preservation procedure will be
discussed in Section 2.3.
Upon receiving water samples from participants, E & E recorded the participant's
reported water sample collection time on the Drinking Water Sampling Field Form as well as
the date and time of E & E's sample pickup from the participant.
In addition to receiving the water sample, an E & E field team member also, if
possible, evaluated the type of plumbing found beneath the kitchen sink. The appropriate box
on the field form indicating the pipe materials was checked by the E & E sampler.
No decontamination procedures for the drinking water sample collection were
necessary.
Sample chain-of-custody was maintained for all samples as described in Section 2.3.
2-5
-------
2.2.4 In Situ Paint Analysis by XRF Instrumentation
In situ analysis by XRF instrumentation of household paint for lead content was
conducted using Spectrace 9000 instrumentation operated by E & E. At the beginning of each
day. a calibration check was performed against known lead standards provided by the
instrument manufacturer.
Upon entering a home, E & E targeted child play areas less than 3 feet in height as
potential points of analysis. Deteriorated painted surfaces in the target areas were of
particular concern. E & E did not collect readings from any non-painted surfaces such as
paneling, wallpaper, or unpainted woodwork. Prior to recording a reading from a new
location, E & E took a clearance reading from the painted surface to stabilize the instrument;
this reading was not recorded. E & E then attempted to collect three readings from five
different areas (i.e., painted walls, sills, painted woodwork, and painted furniture). However,
many of the homes sampled did not have five areas where paint was exposed, since many of
the homes were built or remodeled at a time when wood paneling was popular: painted walls
appeared to be the exception rather than the norm. Each of the readings was recorded on the
XRF Operator Field Form along with the condition of the paint. All readings were accompa-
nied by a description of the type of surfaces, such as door frame or baseboard. E & E also
completed a top-view sketch of the residence indicating primary room functions and the
locations of each of the XRF readings (dust sampling areas were also indicated on this
sketch). Given the above criteria for selection of reading locations, a total of five readings
would be collected from a residence with enough painted surfaces in targeted play areas
within 3 feet of the floor. In many homes, because of the lack of painted surfaces, fewer
readings were collected. Upon completing the readings within a home, the technicians
calculated the arithmetic mean of the recorded readings and entered that number on the field
form.
2.3 SAMPLE LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS
During sampling activities at residential homes and other areas of concern. E & E
recorded information regarding land use. building materials, inhabitants, and floor plans of
homes on the Sampling Summary Information Sheets. The following is a description of
-------
sampling locations (copies of original Sampling Summary Information Sheets can be found in
Appendix C):
RH1 was a two-story, paneled, wood-frame building housing an elderly couple, and
for nine months previous to the sampling, their daughter and 2-year old grandchild. The
property included a garden, shed, swimming pool, and a dog kennel. No children's play
areas were identified by the residents. A soil sample labeled RH1SB was collected from a
bare area west of the home between a pair of trees and the home. Soil sample RH1SG was
collected north of the home and west of the swimming pool. No sample was collected from
the dog kennel, because the dogs remained outside year-round.
Four XRF readings were taken at this home. An average of 0.126 milligrams per
square centimeter (mg/cm;) was calculated for the first area: which was measured from the
painted wooden paneling that was present throughout the first floor. The second location, a
painted wall in a bedroom on the second floor, had a reading of 0.0019 mg/cm;. The third
location, a posts at the front porch, had a reading of 0.140 mg/cm2. The fourth location, a
cinder block along the base of the home near the patio, had a reading of 0.007 mg/cm:.
RH2 was a two-storv, sided, wood-frame home inhabited bv an elderly couple who
d
had The property included a shed and a gravel driveway. Soil sample RH2SB
was collected to the west of the house in a bare area. Soil sample RH2SG was collected in a
grassy area of the backyard, east of the home.
Due to equipment failure, no XRF readings were collected from this household.
RH3 was a single-story, modern (7-year old), sided, home. Two adults and one
fifteen-year-old child live at this residence. The property included a cement driveway/basket
ball court, pool, dog kennel, shed, and a strip of distressed vegetation that ran along the west
side of the home. Soil sample RH3SB was collected from this strip of distressed vegetation,
and soil sample RH3G was collected from a grassy area just south of the house.
With approval of the U.S. EPA RPM, no XRF readings were collected at this home
because it was built only seven years ago.
RH4 was a two-story sided home. The homeowners, although they originally signed
the access agreement, were not cooperative when the sampling crew arrived and limited
information was available at this site. An adult couple and an unknown number of children
live at this home. The property included a pool, swing-set. playhouse, and a shed. Although
-------
it was the play areas that were of concern to the sampling crew, the homeowner requested
that a single sample be collected from the gravel driveway. The crew collected soil sample
and departed this location. Note: this property is adjacent and north of the BCDC2 and
BCDC3 areas described later in this section.
The owner denied approval for XRF screening at the RH4 location.
RH5 was a single-story sided home. An elderly man lived at this residence with one
dog. The property included a covered parking area, a front patio, and a vegetable garden.
Soil sample RH5SG was collected from the north side of this home in a grassy area. The
resident informed the sampling crew that "clean" topsoil fill was placed in the front yard and
in the backyard, within 25 feet south of the home. Soil sample RH5SB was collected from an
area that appeared to show slight vegetal distress in a location that was identified to be outside
of the fill area.
With approval of the U.S. EPA RPM. no XRF readings were collected at this home,
because no painted surfaces existed at this home.
RH6 was a two-story, sided home. An adult couple and two teenaged children lived
at this location. The residents owned two cats. Grounds included a porch, garage, wooden
front porch, and a strip of distressed vegetation running along the southern sid of the home.
Soil samples RH6SB and RH6ASB were collected from the same area along this strip.
RH6SG was collected from a grassy area to the north of the home.
Three XRF readings were collected at this home. The first reading, from a painted
stucco-finished living room wall, had a reading of 0.0015 mg/cnr. No other living areas of
the house had painted surfaces. The second location, an overhead beam in an unfinished
basement, had a reading of 0.003 mg/cm:. The third location, beam on the front porch, had
a reading of 0.062 mg/cnr.
RH7 was a single-story, wood frame home of a couple with three children ages 1,5,
and 7. The property included front porch, shed, garden, and a small children's table. Soil
sample RH7SP was collected from the soil beneath the children's table. Soil sample RH7SB
was collected from an area of distressed vegetation near the sidewalk in the front yard. Soil
sample RH7SG was also collected in the front yard, but in a grassy area.
Five XRF readings were collected at this home. The first location, a window sill in a
child's room, had a reading of 0.008 mg/cm:. The second location, a child's chest of
2-8
-------
drawers, had a reading of 0.105 mg cmv The third location, the doorstop at the child's
room, had a reading of 0.007 mg/cm;. The fourth location, the floor of the back porch, had
a reading of 0.050 mg/cm;. The fifth location, a painted area of the front porch, had a
reading of 0.202 mg/cm:.
RH8 was a two-story sided home. Four adults live in this household. No children
are present but one dog is kept at this location. The property included a large gravel drive-
way/parking lot. tool shed, garage/shed, and a large bare area in front of the house. Soil
sample RH8SB was collected at this bare area. Soil sample RH8SG was collected from a
grassy area south of the house.
Five XRF readings were collected at this home. The first location, a kitchen window
pane, had a reading of 0.00005 mg/cm:. The second location, a window pane on the exterior
of the south side of the house, had a reading of 0.005 mg/cnr. The third location, on the
side of the front porch, had a reading of 0.002 mg/cnr. The fourth location, an outside wall
of the back porch, had a reading of 0.040 mg/cnr. The fifth location, the inside floor of the
back porch, had a reading of 0.169 mg/cnr.
RH9 was a single-story, wood-frame with brick-facing, home. Two adults lived at
this address. The property included a driveway, attached garage, and a deck in the back
yard. Sample RH9SB was collected from an area that showed signs of distressed vegetation.
Sample RH9SG was collected from the front yard in a grassy area.
With approval of the U.S. EPA RPM, no XRF readings were collected at this home,
because it was newly built home.
RH10 was a single-story sided home. The homeowners were not fully cooperative,
as access was denied to the home and only limited information was available at this site. Two
adults and an unknown number of children live at this residence. The property included a
front porch, a swing-set. and a shed. Soil sample RH10SB was collected at an area of
distressed vegetation south of the front porch. Soil samples RH10SP and RH10ASP were
collected directly beneath the children's swing-set. Soil sample RH10SG was collected from a
area east of the home.
The owner denied approval for XRF screening at this home.
RH11 was a single-story sided home. An elderly couple lived in this home.
Although permission was originally granted to enter the home for dust sampling and XRF
2-9
-------
screening, upon the arrival of the sampling team, access to the house was denied. The crew
was allowed to collect samples from the yard, but was not allowed in the home, and limited
information was available. The property included a swing, driveway, and a connected
garage. Soil sample RH11SB was collected in the front yard from an area of possible
distressed vegetation. Soil sample RH11SG was collected from a grassy area in the backyard.
The owner denied approval for XRF screening at this home.
RH12 was a parcel of land owned by a resident of Beckemeyer; however, no
structure is located on this property. A large garden exists at the north side of this plot. Soil
sample RH12SG was collected at a grassy area on this plot. No areas of distressed vegetation
or play areas were detected by the sampling crew.
No painted surfaces existed for the crew to screen with the XRF.
BP is a public park in Beckemeyer. Park grounds included swing-sets, basketball
courts, bathrooms, tennis courts, and horseshoe pits. Soil sample BPSP was collected from
exposed soil under the southernmost swing-set at the park. Soil sample BPSG was collected
in a grassy area between the playground and the swings. Soil sample BPSB was collected
from an area of distressed vegetation near the eastern corner of the picnic pavilion.
No painted surfaces existed for the crew to screen with the XRF.
BES is an elementary school in Beckemeyer. School grounds included a parking
area, shed, basketball court, and a baseball diamond. Soil sample BESSG was collected from
a grassy area to the southeast of the school property. Soil sample BESSB was collected from
an area where grass was distressed, south of school building. Soil sample BESSP was
collected from the baseball diamond at the school building.
No XRF screening was requested by the RPM at this location.
BCDC1 is a public park in Beckemeyer. The parkgrounds included two baseball dia-
monds, playground, pavilion, and what appeared to be a volleyball court under construction.
Soil sample BCDC1SP was collected near home plate of the southern baseball diamond. Soil
sample BCDC1SB was collected from a bare area near the spectator stands between the
baseball diamonds. Soil sample BCDC1SG was collected from a grassy area between the
north and south baseball diamonds.
No XRF screening was requested by the RPM at this location.
2-10
-------
Soil samples BCDC2 and BCDC3 were collected from the same area, but labeled
separately for laboratory duplication purposes. The BCDC2/3 area is a vacant lot directly to
the west and across the street from the BCDC location. This lot is covered in what appears to
be cinders and is directly south of a residential home with children. Soil samples BCDC2 and
BCDC3 were collected from the soil and cindery material at this location.
No painted surfaces existed for the crew to screen with the XRF.
2.4 SAMPLE TRACKING AND HANDLING
As indicated previously, sample bottles for soil and drinking water, were labeled with
the appropriate home identification number prior to entering each property. In addition, the
appropriate home identification number was placed on each field form prior to collecting
samples. Detailed sample information including the date and time of sample collection, the
condition of the property and or the area of concern, the name of the sample collector, and
other relevant information was recorded on the appropriate field forms.
Labeled samples were kept under direct E & E custody or in a locked vehicle. As
samples were collected, an adhesive label was attached to each sample container indicating the
identity of the sample as well as the analyses to be conducted by the laboratory. Water
samples were preserved by adding 2 milliliters of nitric acid to each sample bottle. The
E & E TAT member maintained a detailed logbook of all sample tracking information and
procedures.
Upon completion of field sampling activities, E & E packaged and shipped samples
via Federal Express to E & E's Analytical Services Center (ASC) to be analyzed.
2.5 QUALITY CONTROL MEASURES
E & E collected field duplicate samples for soil, dust, and water at a rate of 10
percent of the total number of samples collected for each matrix. These quality control
samples were handled and tracked according to the same procedures applied to all other
samples. The quality control sample results will be discussed in Section 3.1.
At the end of each day, E & E reviewed the field forms for completeness and
accuracy including all mathematical computations on the XRF forms and the correlation of
2-11
-------
appendix a
ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING PROJECT REPORT
CIRCLE SMELTING
BECKEMEYER, CLINTON COUNTY, ILLINOIS
TDD: T05-9506-014
PAN: EIL0614VDA
ecology and environment, inc.
International Specialists m the Environment
-------
ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING PROJECT REPORT
CIRCLE SMELTING
BECKEMEYER, CLINTON COUNTY, ILLINOIS
TDD: T05-9506-014
PAN: EIL0614VDA
October 12, 1995
Prepared for:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REMEDIAL ENFORCEMENT AND RESPONSE BRANCH
77 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, Illinois 60604
Prepared by: f^(fl Cr f Date: \Q.j<2. j9 5
'jiniUTAT Project Manager
Reviewed by: Date: /tf/
}A Reports Manager
Approved bvT~~/ s ^ J Date:
^ XouriS,
f /?jT
ecology and environment, inc.
111 WEST JACKSON BLVD., CHICAGO. ILLINOIS 60604, TEL. 312-663-9415
International Specialists in the Environment
recycled paper
-------
home identification numbers with the sample containers. Any deficiencies were quickly
corrected.
2-12
-------
ro
*
o
t
~~~sons
QLP HWY 50;
SMELTER HH
RH6
A
RH11
~
U
A
RH5
BP
~
~
~
~
RH12
A
~cnau.ESDPD
BCDC3
w
<
z
<
£
z
o
(A
X
f-
UJ
CD
<
N
Ij
Ui
CO
o
Q
z
<
K
(A
Ui
>
O
O
(A
«A
e
Ui
BCOC1
A = SAMPLE LOCATION
ecology and environment, inc
Technical Assistance Team
Region V
SAMPLE LOCATION MAP
CIRCLE SMELTING SITE
BECKEMEYER
ILLINOIS
ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, INC.
2 I
NOT TO SCALE
III06I4VDA
"'9/8/95
-------
3. ANALYTICAL DATA SUMMARY
The following is a discussion of the derived analytical data quality, and presentation
of the data in tabular form. The raw analytical data results are provided in Appendix C.
3.1 DATA QUALITY
Overall, the soil, dust, and drinking water data are acceptable for the intended use.
However, sampling protocols requested that each sample be passed through a 250 micron
(pLm) sieve. E & E's ASC received the request to sieve dust and soil to 250 pim, however
previous solicitations of this sort specified mesh size. The laboratory contacted the Chicago
E & E office and requested clarification. TATM Mangini spoke with E & E laboratory
coordinator David Hendrin and with U.S. EPA RPM Ramon Torres. Both parties agreed to
the suggestion made by the laboratory to use a 100-mesh sieve. All soil samples, and all but
two dust samples were screened with the 100-mesh sieve.
E & E analytical services manager has reviewed all data from the 20 water samples.
38 soil samples, and 9 dust samples. All samples were analyzed within holding time
requirements. No target analytes were detected in blanks. Overall, data met the Quality
Assurance (QA) Level II standards as outlined in the Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response (OSWER) Directive 9360.4-01 (April 1990). Data Validation Procedures, Section
3.0, Metallic Inorganic Parameters.
In addition to the original metallic organic parameter analysis, by request of the U.S.
EPA Risk Assessor, Pat Van Leeuwen, the ASC gathered additional information subsequent to
the original analysis. The additional information was gathered to answer questions regarding
3-1
-------
particle size distribution of samples, and dust and lead loading in the homes. Details of
additional information gathering methods are contained in Section 3.2. Additional testing
results are contained in Appendix E.
3.2 DATA SUMMARY TABLES
Table 3-1 presents the analytical data of field samples collected during the Circle
Smelting Environmental Sampling Project. The data are presented in a summary- table, and
were compiled from laboratory analysis of soil, water, and dust samples; also included in this
table are arithmetic means of the in situ XRF results. Appendix C also contains the raw-
analytical data results provided by E & E's ASC.
Percent by mass through the 100-mesh sieve for all soil and dust samples is presented
in Table 3-2. Data for this table was collected through weighing total mass of non-analyzed
portion of samples. Samples were sieved and the sieved portion was then weighed. The mass
of the sieved portion was divided by the total mass to determine a percent through sieve
value.
Dust and lead loading information for homes is presented in Table 3-3. Samples
were not weighed before analysis. However since precisely 1 gram was used for analysis of
each sample, total mass was determined by weighing the remaining portion of the samples and
adding 1 gram. Dust loading was determined by dividing the calculated total mass of dust by
the areas of the homes sampled. Lead loading was then calculated by factoring the analyzed
lead concentrations into the dust loading data.
3-2
-------
Table 3-1
LEAD ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CIRCLE SMELTING SITE
BECKEMEYER, ILLINOIS
(JULY 1995)
Sample
Location
Grassy Aread
tot." scrn.b
Play Aread
tot." scrn.b
Bare Aread
tot.a scrn.b
Dust'
result area*
Water'
(First Draw)
Water'
(Flush)
XRF
Average'
RH1
146
151
N/A
N/A
394
291
465
28
2.6
2.1
0.0671
RH2
380
402
N/A
N/A
649
497
268
24
9 1
2.1
N/A
RH3
734
453
N/A
N/A
140
174
115
28
7.2
4.1
N/A
RH4
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
4,790
5,240
N/A
N/A
10
10
N/A
RH5
587
376
N/A
N/A
873
356
37.7
12
12
1.2
N/A
RH6
RH6A
236
N/A
166
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1,750
2,820
2,240
2,410
178
N/A
20
N/A
3.3
N/A
2.9
N/A
0.022
RH7
RH7A
1,670
N/A
227
N/A
623
N/A
519
N/A
1,640
2,170
1,750
1,690
508
N/A
16
N/A
3.6
N/A
1.6
N/A
0.0534
N/A
RII8
298
185
N/A
N/A
1,530
903
244
12
2.1
1.1
0.04321
RH9
72.7
32.4
N/A
N/A
128
153
15.9
16
5.2
N/A
N/A
RH10
Rill OA
48.9
N/A
13.2
N/A
2,580
2,670
2,380
2,420
1,350
N/A
1,090
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
6 4
N/A
18
N/A
N/A
N/A
RHI1
125
59.8
N/A
N/A
125
83 9
N/A
N/A
4.1
N/A
N/A
-------
Table 3-1
LEAD ANALYTICAL RESULTS
CIRCLE SMELTING SITE
BECKEMEYER, ILLINOIS
(JULY 1995)
Sample
Location
Grassy Area-
tot." scrn.b
Play Aread
tot." scrn.b
Bare Aread
tot." scrn.b
Dustr
result area"
Water1
(First Draw)
Water1
(Flush)
XRF
Average'
RH12
261
189
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
BP
402
443
1,200
834
1,800
1,490
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
BES
61.7
52.7
166
160
175
123
164
24
N/A
N/A
N/A
BCDC1
246
132
56.8
12.1
106
63.2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
BCDC3
BCDC2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
9,250
9,160
10,100
10,200
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
All analyses performed by Ecology and Environment, Inc.'s Analytical Services Center, Buffalo, New York, under analytical TDD
T05-9506-809.
Key:
N/A = No sample was collected for this parameter at this location,
a = Sample was digested prior to any screening activities performed by laboratory,
b = Sample was digested after it was passed through a No. 100 mesh sieve,
c = Water sample results reported in /*g/L
d = Soil results reported in mg/kg.
e = Arithmetic mean of all XRF results taken at a residence reported in mg/cnv2.
f = Dust sample results reported in mg/kg. All samples passed through a No. 100 mesh screen except for RH5D & RH9D.
g = Area jn ft2
-------
Table 3-2
PERCENT BY MASS THROUGH 100-MESH SCREEN
CIRCLE SMELTING SITE
BECKEMEYER, ILLINOIS
(JULY 1995)
Sample
Location
Grassy Area
(% Passes)
Bare Area
(% Passes)
Play Area
(% Passes)
House Dust
(% Passes >
RH1
9.6
25.8
N/A
5.2
RH2
28.6
30.4
N/A
10.2
RH3
15.0
4.9
N/A
4.6
RH4
N/A
11.1
N/A
N/A
RH5
23.3
30.8
N/A
0.0
RH6
40.1
12.5
N/A
5.1
RH6A
N/A
16.4
N/A
N/A
RH7
24.2
25.6
31.5
1.2
RH7A
N/A
27.1
N/A
N/A
RH8
25.2
24.4
N/A
11.2
RH9
14.5
17.9
N/A
0.7
RH10
14.4
20.9
38.0
N/A
RH10A
N/A
N/A
30.8
N/A
RH 11
4.8
13.2
N/A
N/A
RH 12
25.4
N/A
N/A
N/A
BP
10.6
14.3
29.6
N/A
BES
9.9
26.7
7.2
4.9
BCDC1
31.9
18.5
14.0
N/A
BCDC2
N/A
24.4
N/A
N/A
BCDC3
N/A
20.6
N/A
N/A
All analyses performed by Ecology and Environment. Inc.'s Analytical Services Center. Buffalo. New York, under
analytical TDD T05-9506-809. For additional information see Section 3.2.
Key:
N A = No sample was collected for this parameter at this location.
3-5
-------
Table 3-3
DUST AND LEAD LOADING RESULTS
CIRCLE SMELTING SITE
BECKEMEYER, ILLINOIS
(JULY 1995)
Total
Mass"
Dust Loading
(g/nr)
Lead Concentration
0*g/g)
Lead Loading
(fig lead/nf)
6.01
2.31
465
1070
6.28
2.82
268
765
4.29
1.65
115
190
6.22
5.60
37.7
211
4.76
2.56
178
456
7.95
5.34
508
2710
5.55
4.98
244
1220
4.03
2.70
15.9
42.9
3.47
1.56
164
256
. performed by Ecology and Environment, Inc.'s Analytical Services Center,
w York, under analytical TDD T05-9506-809. For additional information see
,s information reconstructed by adding one gram to the total mass measured after
lysis. Note all mass values are the masses of entire (i.e. unsieved) samples,
ause inadequate quantity of sample passed through the 100-mesh sieve, samples
5D and RH9D analyzed without pre-sieving.
3-6
-------
Table 3-3
DUST AND LEAD LOADING RESULTS
CIRCLE SMELTING SITE
BECKEMEYER, ILLINOIS
(JULY 1995)
Dust Sample
Dust Loading
(g/m;)
Lead Concentration
-------
APPENDIX A
PHOTODOCUMENTATION OF SAMPLE LOCATIONS
A-l
-------
\
: I 'I
l-ll"
I'll"
li/YI
hll
I 1 i '
; N AMK : i' l I i' I i' Mini - II Ni'|
¦II MI IMII:I¦" : I
\ II ;|.\M'IIKI> : M I K I1! MArli ; I II I
l(/ |»;>1 T1 Ml-::
> 1 I I "I I : . ' 11 11 I I
¦| II i I , . |„ ,. Ml I ' ' I I "I '"'I ' '
| i 11 - I, . I : . I I u 11 I' I . VJ I I r I::' ¦1
-------
S ITK N AMK : i ' i i i 1 I i ¦ init I I I 111 |
Iii.r. - ! Jt JMI 'I :i-;: <
ii' >t< «;k/wiii-:k : M I KI r. man. ; i u i
/¦. ! I : : 11/ | M / ")' , * I' I Ml-: : i I ¦ I 1 II
I I I :< "I I • 'II : : • .Ill I iw< •: .1
II I !< <11 : I .1 I ', i I I . <1 l - I I' I : III,I I .
i ; ii. ¦! ¦ i . . I iii i ¦, ¦ k , in. '/¦ i i ill.
(
-------
-------
II lu
V*'
:: I I I' fJAMK : ( ' i i i ¦ I : ;in. ¦ I l i ¦,
Mli'Td Nl IMHI'IK : 7
i ii< •' i' '' ;kAiiii-;i< : m i k i-: r. man*; i m i
I ' ¦ ! I' : <17/ 111 /•>', r I Ml-: : I .'Ml
Ml' I0 "I' I ' >N . [J. .1 I Iiw.-::l
I -I-.. ¦' 'i n r i ¦ jf J: I. i-1-:.-: i ¦ i
I I I I I I -III I ¦ I > I . I I I I I III, .|, I
-------
•, | ¦ 11 ¦; i j am [¦:: i11 i ('li' ;iu< M in']
I III )T' ' MllMhkk : '<
11, . [,i TmI'III-T : M I K !¦: ' ' . MAN' i I II I
I I I; . II/, I l! ' , T 11-11-. : I ' I /
l i I Iii'1
i i -'! i i 11111 'I i. .. 11<11 i ¦ i' K:; r .I' - ¦ ¦ 1111 -1
: i rI•: namk: ai
Mli
-------
T*. #
i I I K N AMI'! : ( ' i i . ¦ I t .in, | | j 11,)
l'H< »T( ) Nl IMI'.KK : I I
I'll' > n 'i ikai'iikk : Mm-: r. mam. ;
I '/\'rI-: : (I I / 1 M / 'I'l ¦ 1' t M|¦; ;
I ' I K ki "I' 1 , ||-1 : W. :; I
i 'i:':1 'k i i 11' i > if J. i * 1111[ > I. i; 11 -: k.
I 1 1 I I M ill 1 I, I 1 . , 1 I I . I
nami-:: h ,,M
' 11' >'l\ I f.JI IMI'.I I ,
' ' 1 h 'l-'.M 'III- ; 1-1 : I i 1 MATJi ; | j j |
1 ,/l 1 K ¦ 11 '' 1 ' 11 I I f li. u , | ¦,
I' I I' I-.. l|J . | , ;
kk.'a'k I I N I, . , ; I, ,
(
-------
. • I II'. TJ AMI\ : I ' i I i ' 1 t - Inu ¦ | I i i )i j
I'll. >Ti , rjl IMUl'.'k : I J
Mion )' ;k/\ i i ii-:w : mifi-: <\ manii ; m i
I 'A'l l-:; II //| <)/')', I I Ml-;: II', j,,
II I K!¦:< "I II
-------
' n': rjAM|,; : 1 ' 1 I 1 ' I < : ¦ I i , ,, ,
I'll" H i i NI)M|ii:k': | i,
1 AM IKK: MIKI-: M/ifji ; | fj |
"V|,|':; t,V •' I''/''". |li;il
' 1 '-*!¦:> T I i >N :
M ¦ 1 '' ' ' ' 11 : n!i|. i, ¦ i-, ¦ 11, ¦ j .,, ;
¦¦ ' 1 ¦ I' '¦! 1 1 I .1 hcii.' j | I
-------
'¦ "AMI-. : • 'i I • I . .Sllli ¦ I I ill')
11 Ml IMI'.Kk : 17
' " :l' 'I: M I KI-: ('. MAtJl I I N I
¦ 11 I 'i I' I Ml-: : 1 I).Ill
"H 'fJ : f-J. > I I li,
'' K' ' 1 T 1 ' 1 1 ' I '!» ' I M' . : >ih, j | , .
111,1 1,1 "" ' :1 1 I .1 i .m,, i, I .,i ! ,| |
lih
I 1 / ¦. I
I'll-
ITK NAMI-: , , , ,
' »•• II i li. I
' 1 ' ' ' HI lf-!l-I I ,
MI"T",:|':'U "'¦¦¦' H,r, „An(:|1J
n/ 1 ' " r11-n-.. 11,1,,,
I'l l-'lj Tl,
,, Mii;,h
-------
>1111' I I i 11.1
I TK NAMI-: : < ' i i , • |,
I'll''Til NIIMMKK: 1'/
I 'I l> 'l'i » IK'Al 11|-:|< : MIKI-: MANi 1 I N I
1 ,ATI':: I •>; 'I I mi-: ; mi.:
I 1 I K 1-.1 "r I I 'N : Ni ) I I 1 iWt -S I
'''- •' '¦ ' i ''' i1 'N : :¦ (11| i|t- id i1.
:: l TI-: rJAMi-:.
ill. > r i i in ii-ii-1 :i
in. i1 " :i-' i 111 .i
I IT. .ii'
i ' i ii > 1 r i - i :
hi-: 'i- i i i 11
.in. ii 111. i
i i: '
I I'M
I-IANi : I 11
II I M
<
-------
:; I TK hi AMK : (' i i . • I >• :-nu II I 111 |
III" >Ti ' Nl IMBKk : 1
1 ih Hi«;iv/\i•! 11.-:u : mikk c. MAtu; 1 n 1
1'ATI-: : 117/ I ;/•>', T I Ml-: : I j.jy
I' 1 I I-:- "I'll Ifil : |j, ,, I I,
l'i: 'I. I l-Th'tl: ini| .1.-:; kl li .A: :h I 111.:; Is .
:. I TK IJAMK ; - ¦ 1 1 . 1 11, |i u, |
I'lh i'I'i 1 Nl IMI',1 h -
I'lh >Ti n ikAl i iki 1 • i 1 n: >•. mm-j. ; 1 u 1
I iATK : II/. I ' • 11 Ml-' : 1 1 1 ',
I ' I KKi "I' I 1 -II . nil.
111 ; 1 T 1 1 r 1 11 1. .1 1 1 11. .-it;.
-------
:, rI'I•: NAMK: < ' »
rut ri'i i MUMI'III-::
i ih ri'i »•
i .ati-.. u'', i ' '
i I |. K- 11 > H l-
I I ¦ I I- :'.in. • I I l II 1
r-i i k i-: i'. M.'M i1 ¦ i "
•I imi-: : t -r.'.
I
. tlllj - 1 - . I ¦ ¦ - ¦ ' ' '
-------
-------
i,,,
1 ' 1' " 'I' AI'IIKk MIKK (•. MANCIMI
I' I Ml-. : if) | -
n: rj,,, , I,
'';'""l'>'
>•
R
¦ I'll-: ri/'.r-ii-.
I Ih =•!*. ' [II M-ll I I
! ! I1 >T' »
I 'ATK : I 1 '
MM'/'i l-II I
I 11 : ¦ ¦ ' 1 v' I I U 11 .
..»• > > iii)
M. ' MAM '.IN
i i i-ii': ii'/'.1.
i ill i ii-
(
-------
;;IT,; ¦''•••••'Ii:: fi I ,
I'IImTii IMIIMI'.|-:k : ."I
1'Hi >Ti ii IK'AI'ilKK : MIKK C. MANl I I f j |
MA'I'K: II 7 / .; (| / ¦; i, '|' J MM ; Iimjii
'•"> "!• I ¦ >rj : U, : ¦ i
1 '' ,|; 1 l"1' 1 1 *1: Kill
j
'I-: hai-ii:
i-i-i-
ill'l . |.| i | |,
¦1'" ll wi'i
MAIJi ;in
'I'l- i , i
• 'I' ill! ¦!,
-------
.'ill I-, rj AM !•: : ( ' i I , ¦ I , . ; . I , j ! ], |
rill'Til NIIMHI'k: <1
riii) i'i«;kai 11!¦:i<: mikk r. man< : i n 1
' i /.'. r (i /' • - ¦, ri mi :; |n.:il
CM' I'.i ,N: w, ¦.:!
' ''¦¦¦' ¦1 I I I ' I' I l >N ; i. 11111 ) | < •; ; K' 11 III /,>; I .
' '' I ' 1 '1 ' ¦': III I it .11 I I , I, I 11 I
i ll I i)¦:I •
I ¦ " ' 11 I II
-------
:| TK : ' n. I,- I, i |,, j
NUMUKK ; H
1 'll " ¦'I'-'AIIIKk : MIKK MANCINI
l'An-:: nV./.Mi/',', TIMK; Mm,,
1 1 "i' i. ir j : i :,,;: t
i 'I'l-: fj/\mi.
II. IT,
I I
I ( II 1 |
1 1 1 ' 11 M/'.rj,; i u
I ;i-li i i • •
T . > !;
' 'I. I ! I I
-------
-------
APPENDIX B
SAMPLING SUMMARY INFORMATION SHEETS
)
B-l
-------
SAMPLING SUMMARY INFORMATION SHEET
CIRCLE SMELTING JULY 1995
SAMPLE LOCATION ID: RU \
DATE: TIME; " v5
SAMPLER: U\+P
HOUSE INFORMATION
ONE STORY BRICK
_/two STORY j/ WOOD FRAME
J^SIOING )•*( L -k
OO FENCED
SWING SET
DOGS _^POOL
OTHER
SOIL SAMPLE ID'S: 5B .
WATER SAMPLE ID'S:
DUST SAMP.E 10'S:
INHABITANTS
NUMBER OF ADULTS: i
NUMBER OF CHILDRB4:
AGES OF CHILDRBI: 2
FIGURE 1 EXTERIOR OF HOUSE
«==+
~ ^ ! pj ¦ ' 1 'I i 1 H \ '
TT
MAIN BUILDING SAMPLE LOCATIONS PLAY AREAS
BOUNDARY OF LOT SIDE WALKS/DRIVE WAYS EXPOSED SOIL
SIDEWALKS GARAGES/SHEDS RAIN SPOUTS
-------
FIGURE 2 INTERIOR FLOOR PLAN OF HOUSE
I
W"iW<
i""/- y<- j
—1
^ 'J PL
(J
T
INCLUDING:
_L. ROOM LABELS OUST AREA CALCULATION
DUST SAMPLE AREAS MAIN ENTRANCE MARKED
PAJNJ SCTEej LOCATIONS
CSwmSaa^vooD floor "",l
A?VtV-TTin»io^v imh! pn>ipniimiMii
nCMKAflBno «»m»c% una *nvironmeni
-------
XRF PAINT SCREENING FORM
HOME 10 NUMBER M.
SAMPLE MUN8ER g-Ul
DATE fflfe
START TJKlE.
ENO TIME
|l Jq
\\7C
TgHNIOAN
ARfTHMMCTIC MEAN 01* READINGS «0k1l
l<
READING 1 ./2 (/.!
READING 2
READING 3 JJ-f-/. 1
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
READING 1
READING 2
READING 3
L/k
.ODty.0 7
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
L K
READING 1 . /Yo/,2^
READING 2
READING 3
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
C/
READING 1
READING 2
READING 3
LOCATION 1
PAINT IN THIS AREA IS:
X INTACT
_ SLIGHT TO MOOERATE PEELING
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PEELING
U Q~J~
a/t ^ TZZ
¦JOm
LOCATION 2
PAINT IN THIS AREA IS:
INTACT
_ SUGHT TO MOOERATE PEELING
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PEELING
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
LOCATION 3
PAINT IN THIS AREA IS:
INTACT
_ SLIGHT TO MOOERATE PEELING
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME ^JNG
2 7.,/ ^ lift- M X- u.
LOCATION 4
PAINT IN THIS AREA IS:
_ INTACT
_ SUGHT TO MOOERATE PGBJNG
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PEELING
READING 1
READING 2
READING 3
LOCATION 5
PAINT IN THIS AREA IS:
MOOERATE PSUNG
_ mooeratTto^xtreme peejng
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
-------
VACUUM DUST SAMPLING FORM
- SOft. SAMPLE ID'S: K
TOTAL AREA SAMPLED: ^ FT*.
REMEBER TO:
\S LABB. SAMPLE JARS
\4 MARK SAMPLE AREAS ON FIGURE 2
U CHANGE VACUUM FILTER AND DECON VACUUM.
SAMPLE ID:
PATE COLLECTED: ?/)«/«! 4
TIME COLLECTS:
DATE SAMPLE PICKED UP; 'A&
TIME SAMPLE PICKS) UP: r5r
PRESERVATIVE ADOED: \/
PLUMBING:
COPPER _SsGALVANI2ED PVC LEAD
NOTES:
DRINKING WATER SAMPUNG FORM
NOTES:
recycled paper
recvcied oaoer
ecvcied oaoer
nini pnvirnomeni
tirni fn>in»nmrtti
-rulufv «no mvvonmcni
-------
SAMPLING SUMMARY INFORMATION SHEET
CIRCLE SMELTING JULY 1995
SAMPLE LOCATION 10:
DATE: Ml# TIME^SuS
SAMPLER:
HOUSE INFORMATION
ONE STORY BRJCX
X TWO STORY J
-------
FIGURE 2 INTERIOR FLOOR PLAN OF HOUSE
INCLUDING:
ROOM LABELS DUST AREA CALCULATION
OUST SAMPLE AREAS MAIN ENTRANCE MARKED
LOCATIONS
OOD FLOOR T
fi'iMHC* unci environment
'ohifv and rn^irnnmeni
-------
XRF PAINT SCREENING FORM
HOME 10 NUM8» TECHNICIAN ,
SAMPLE MUNBER ARTTHMMETTC MEAN OF READINGS
DATE
START TIME
END TIME
LOCATION 1
READING 1 PAINT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 _ INTACT
READING 3 _ SLIGHT TO MOOERATE PEELING
_ MOOBUTE TO EXTREME PSL1NG
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
LOCATION 2
READING 1 PAINT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 _ INTACT
READING 3 _ SLIGHT TO MOOERATE PEELING
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PEELING
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
LOCATION 3
READING 1 PAMT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 INTACT
READING 3 _ SLIGHT TO MOOBUTE PEBJNG
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PEELING
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE: - •
LOCATION 4
READING 1 PAINT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 _ INTACT
READING 3 _ SLIGHT TO MOOERATE PEBJNG
_ MOOBUTE TO EXTREME PEBJNG
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE-
LOCATION 5
READING 1 PAMT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 _ INTACT
READING 3 _ SUGHT TO MOOERATE PSJNG
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PEBJNG
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
-------
VACUUM OUST SAMPLING FORM
SAMPLE LOCATION 10: SAMPLE ID'S:
DATE; TIME: \armMii
reCVCied Odoer hihI en>imnm<*Mi
•ecvc«0 oaoer ana rnwonmcm
-------
SAMPLING SUMMARY INFORMATION SHEET
CIRCLE SMELTING JULY 1995
SAMPLE LOCATION 10:
DATE: 71X9 TlMEljESE
SAMPIBfr
¦HpUSE INFORMATION
^¦ons rrogf Bfvoc
TWO STORY __ WOOO FRAME
S SIDING
FBJCED
SWING SET
POOL
OTHBt
SOIL SAMPLE ID'S:
WATER SAMPLE ID'S: ^ g^VlC
DUST SAMPIf ID'S: g-UVFT
OOGS
INHAMTANT3 ~
NUMBER OP ADULTS: _£
NUMBBI OP CH&DR84: I
AGES OF CHILDREN: 75
FK3URE 1 EXTERIOR OF HOUSE
mCCCBIRST
\ MAIN BUILDING X. SAMPLE LOCATIONS * PLAY AREAS
T BOUNDARY OF LOT SIDE WALXSARIVE WAYS X~ EXPOSED SOB.
SIDEWALKS GARAGES£HEDS X RAIN SPOUTS
-------
FIGURE 2 INTERIOR FLOOR PLAN OF HOUSE
INCLUOING:
ROOM LABELS
DUST SAMPLE AREAS
LOCATIONS
_ ftMWBToQR-WOOO FLOOR
OUST AREA CALCULATION
MAIN ENTRANCE MARKED
iMologt and *nwnnimcnt
mid envinirimem
fratocv ana pnwonmeni
-------
XRF PAINT SCREENING FORM
HOME ID NUMBER ^ H&E TECHNICIAN
SAMPLE MUN8ER AMTHMMETTC MEAN OF READINGS
DATE
START TTME
END TIME _
LOCATION 1
PAMT IN THIS AREA IS:
_ INTACT
_ SLIGHT TO MODERATE PEELJNG
_ MOOERATE TO EXTRSME PEELING
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
READING 1
READING 2
READING 3
LOCATION 2
READING 1 PAINT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 _ INTACT
READING 3 _ SLIGHT TO MOOERATE PEELING
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PEELJNG
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
LOCATION 3
READING 1 PAMT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 _ INTACT
READING 3 _ SLIGHT TO MODBUTE PEBJNG
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PEBJNG
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE: '
LOCATION 4
READING 1 PAMT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 _ INTACT
READING 3 _ SLIGHT TO MOOERATE PfflJNG
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PSJNG
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
LOCATION 5
READING 1 PAMT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 _ INTACT
READING 3 _ SLIGHT TO MOOERATE PGBJNG
MOOERATE TO EXTREME PffiJNG
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
-------
VACUUM OUST SAMPLING FORM
SAMPLE VOCATION IO: SO«. SAMPLE ID'S: EtUh
DATE: llll TIME: 0^20
SAMPLE rwg»'SHC0
I OF CHILDREN IN HOME:
TOTAL AREA SAMPLED: ZP) FT*.
REMEBER TO: ,
• < Ajffl ^AMH f JARSn /
• MARK SAMPLE AREAS ON FIGURE 2 / I
• CHANGE VACUUM FILTER AND DECON VACUUM.^
NOTES:
DRINKING WATER SAMPLING FORM
SAMPLE ID: ^AV^V
DATE COLLECTED: 1M
TIME COLLECTED: gOO. CC,2P
DATE SAMPLE PtCXH) UP: 1
TIME SAMPLE PICXH) UP: "*<-
PRESERVATIVE AOOED: V
PLUMBING:
COPPER GALVANIZED PVC LEAD
NOTES:
^^4 WiMVt °f tN<
recycled D3p6r (Minion* and pn»in»nmftn
reCVCted oaoer trnlogt un
-------
SAMPUNG SUMMARY INFORMATION SHEET
CIRCLE SMELTING JULY 1995
SAMPLE LOCATION 10:
DATE: 1 11 TIME: iOY7
SAMPLER: : ^
2
HOUSE INFORMATION
NE STORY BRICK
TWO STORY WOOD FRAME
vv X SIOING
fenced v.
SWING SET
_ DOGS * POOL
T~ OTHER
SOIL SAMPLE ID'S: fUNl H P , K*
I**™ ' _
WATER SAMPLE ID'S: '
OUST SAMPLE 10'S:
INHABITANTS
NUMBS! OF AOULTS:
NUMBER OP CHILDREN:
AGES OF CMLOREN:
FIGURE 1 EXTERIOR OF HOUSE
INCUIDING: ^
\i_ MAIN BUILDING __ SAMPLE LOCATIONS PLAY AREAS
_1_ BOUNDARY OF LOT 2. SIDE WALKS/DRIVE WAYS EXPOSH) SOfl.
Ji SIOE WALKS J1 GARAGES/SHEDS RAIN SPOUTS
-------
FIGURE 2 INTERIOR FLOOR PLAN OF HOUSE
Ow SliLry* J \^To KoovC>
1
1
INCLUDING:
ROOM LABELS OUST AREA CALCULATION
OUST SAMPLE AREAS MAIN ENTRANCE MARKED
cWNJtSGB®' LOCATIONS (lti.l cn»irimm
-------
XRF PAINT SCREENING FORM
VvvW^
HOME 10 NUMBER TECHNICIAN
SAMPLE MUNBER ' ARfTHMMETIC MEAN OF READINGS
DATE
START TIME
END TIME
LOCATION 1
READING 1 PAINT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 _ INTACT
READING 3 _ SUGHT TO MOOERATE PEELING
MOOERATE TO EXTREME PSUNG
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
LOCATION 2
READING 1 PAINT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 _ INTACT
READING 3 _ SUGHT TO MOOERATE PEELING
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PEBJNG
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
LOCATION 3
READING 1 PAINT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 _ INTACT
READING 3 __ SLIGHT TO MOOERATE PEELING
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PfflJNG
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE: - .
LOCATION 4
READING 1 PAINT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 _ INTACT
READING 3 _ SUGHT TO MOOERATE PEBJNG
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PffiJNG
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
LOCATION 5
READING 1 PAINT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 _ INTACT
READING 3 _ SUGHT TO MOOERATE PSUNG
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PEBJNG
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
-------
**r°
VACUUM DUST SAMPLING FORM
SAMPLE LOCATION 10: SOIL SAMPLE ID'S:
DATE: TIME:
SAMPLER:
# OF CHILDREN IN HOME:
TOTAL AREA SAMPLED: FT*.
REMEBERTO:
• LABB. SAMPLE JARS
• MARK SAMPLE AREAS ON FIGURE 2
• CHANGE VACUUM FILTER ANO OECON VACUUM.
NOTES:
DRINKING WATER SAMPLING FORM
SAMPLE ID:
OATE COLLECTED: tnff ~
TIME COLLECTED: cMPnW* .
OATE SAMPLE PtOCH)
TIME SAMPLE PICKED UP: WT~
PRESERVATIVE AOOED: \/
PLUMBING:
COPPER GALVANIZB) PVC LEAO
NOTES:
recycled paper
recvcieo oaoer
ecvcieo oaper
iH'ulotf* rtiid rnvinmmeiif
Hiiii environment
fcotofv ana environment
-------
SAMPLE
DATE:
SAMPLER*
VTION 10:
"LELOCA
* TIME:
SAMPLING SUMMARY INFORMATION SHEET
CIRCLE SMELTING JULY 1995
ONEJCTOITO
toctstoi
sg INFORMATION
.STOR# BRICK
STORY WOOD FRAME
SlO(NG
FBJCED
SWING SET
J_ DOGS POOL
OTHER
SOIL SAMPLE ID'S:.
WATER SAMPLE ID'S: VIU"? vTC .
DUST SAMP-.£ ID'S:
-------
FIGURE 2 INTERIOR FLOOR PLAN OF HOUSE
jr
I
* V
S C\|
-2 -V
£ =>
a J*
\D 3
VI
is\
V
*1
*
\j
o
o
y
J
INCLUDING:
ROOM LABELS
OUST SAMPLE AREAS
PAINT SCREEN LOCATIONS
LWOOD FLOOR
OUST AREA CALCULATION
MAIN BfTRANCE MARKED
prolog i«fi«l envimnmrtii
r<-oiog\ mid eminwmrni
fcvlocv mna ennronmeni
-------
XRF PAINT SCREENING FORM
HOME 10 NUMB® TECHNICIAN
SAMPUE MUNBS* AflfTHMMET)C MEAN OF READINGS
DATE
START TIME
FND TIME
LOCATION 1
PAINT IN THIS AREA IS:
_ INTACT
_ SLIGHT TO MOOERATE PSJNG
_ MOOERATE TO EXTRBME PEBJNG
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
READING 1
READING 2
READING 3
LOCATION 2
READING 1 PAINT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 _ INTACT
READING 3 _ SLIGHT TO MOOERATE PEELING
MOOERATE TO EXTREME PEELING
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
LOCATION 3
READING 1 PAMT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 INTACT
READING 3 __ SLIGHT TO MOOERATE PSJNG
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PEELING
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE: ' -
LOCATION 4
READING 1 PAMT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 _ INTACT
READING 3 __ SLIGHT TO MOOERATE PEELING
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PEELING
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
LOCATION 5
READING 1 PAMT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 _ INTACT
READING 3 _ SLIGHT TO MOOERATE PEELING
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PEELING
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE
-------
VACUUM OUST SAMPLING FORM
SAMPLE LOCATION 10: CftS HL SAMPLE ID'S: fN
DATE MA TIME: WW.
SAMPLER: P + 'Z
# OF CMLDRBV IN HOME: _2
TOTAL AREA SAMPLED: \2- FT*.
REMOERTO:
• i ami -tamp p jars
• MARK SAMPLE AREAS ON FIGURE 2
• CHANGE VACUUM FILTER ANO OGCON VACUUM.
NOTES:
DRINKING WATER SAMPLING FORM
SAMPLE tD:
iW"
DATE COLLECTS): _1
TIME COLLECTED:
DATE SAMPLE PK3CH? UP:
TIME SAMPLE PICKB) UP;
PRESERVATIVE AOOB>: v
PLUMBING:
COPPB* X GALVANIZED PVC LEAD
NOTES:
recycled paoef
recycled oaDer
-ecvcieo oaotr
CC(»||»«V aiui rmirunmrui
dihI mviniiimfiii
fi-oioC and environment
-------
SAMPLING SUMMARY INFORMATION SHEET
CIRCLE SMELTING JULY 1995
SAMPLE LOCATION 10: Ml
DATE: 7M TIME:
SAMPLER!
HOUSE INFORMATION
STORY BMCX
TWO STORt\ WOOD FRAME
SIDING
FENCED
!_ oeaa
CMs
SWING SET
< POOL
OTH0*
SOIL SAMPLE ®'S:
WATER SAMPLE ID'S:
DUST SAMPLE ID'S: * mis
irttfiBFTftNTS
NUMBS! OF AOIILTS:
NUM8ER OF CH&DREN:
AGES OF CHADR8I:
>
-------
FIGURE 2 INTERIOR FLOOR PLAN OF HOUSE
3 i
V.
* ^
u.
u
o
j
(f 1 VlKj
^ J,
CO -c>
^ Ce i>
n
4 f 'J.
r>
v/M.
y
>
s
\
i
* 4
£ J
*Q
Si
-J-V
4
<./l/\/
-------
XRF PAINT SCREENING FORM
HOME ID NUMBER ? ^ TECHNICIAN
SAMPLE MUNBER <*V) AWTHMMETIC MEAN OF READINGS ,>M1
DATE .
START TIME.
END TIME
L <
READING 1
READING 2
READING 3
LOCATION 1
PAINT IN THIS AREA IS:
_ X INTACT
_ _ SliGHT TO MOOERATE PEEUNG
_ MOOERATE TO EXTR84E PSJNG
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
^\X£a y K1. ca
LOCATION 2
READING 1 1
READING 2
READING 3
PAINT IN THIS AREA IS:
_ INTACT
_ SLIGHT TO MOOERATE PEELING
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PEELING
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
1A Q&rinv.
READING 1
READING 2
READING 3
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
LOCATION 3
PAINT IN THIS AREA IS:
_ INTACT
_ SUGHTTO MOOERATE PEELING
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PSUNG
READING 1
REAOING 2
READING 3
LOCATION 4
A
PAMT IN THIS AREA IS:
_ INTACT
_ SUGHT TO MOOERATE PEELING
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PSUNG
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
LOCATION 5 , -
, , V*
READING 1 PAINT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 _ INTACT
READING 3 _ SUGHT TO MOOERATE PEEUNG
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PEEUNG
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
-------
VACUUM OUST SAMPLING FORM
SAMPLE LOCATION ID: 90* SAMPLE 10'S:
DATE: TIME: AH)
SAMPLER: '
9 OF CHILDREN IN HOME: ZL
TOTAL AREA SAMPLED: 20 FT*.
REMEBERTO:
• LABB. SAMPLE JARS
• MARX SAMPLE AREAS ON FIGURE 2
• CHANGE VACUUM FILTER AND DECON VACUUM.
NOTES:
DRINKING WATER SAMPLING FORM
SAMPLE 10:
DATE COLLECTED: _
TIME COUECTHD:
DATE SAMPLE PtCXH) UP:
TIME SAMPLE PKXB3 UP: T"
PRESERVATIVE AOOED: V
PLUMBING:
COPPER GALVANIZED PVC LEAD
NOTES:
recyciec paper
-ecvciea caper
recycled oaotf
cvnlotfv tinil
rmiotf* tiiui ^nvirmimrni
i>coto<< and environment
-------
SAMPUNG SUMMARY INFORMATION SHEET
CIRCLE SMELTING JULY 1995
SOIL SAMPLERS:
WATER SAMPLE ID'S: H.WoKL } H<-7ug
DUST SAMPLE ID'S: '-VS~7 ^
INHAMTANTS
NUM8B1 OF AOULTS:
NUMSBt OF CHILDREN: *
AGES OF CWLDREN: TT
FIGURE 1 EXTERIOR OF HOUSE
muEiufi:
MAIN BUILDING
BOUNDARY OF LOT
SIDE WALKS
SAMPLE LOCATION ID: HS (¦
OATE: -7)fl TIME: >T
SAMPLER:
-MOUSE INFORMATION
LSTORY^ BRKX
DRY X. WOOD FRAME
SIDING
SWING SET
POOL
^ OTHER ?\lkrv{kTtoU
SAMPLE LOCATIONS PLAY AREAS
SIOE WALKS/DRIVE WAYS EXPOSED SOIL
GARAGES/SHEDS RAIN SPOUTS
-------
FIGURE 2 INTERIOR FLOOR PLAN OF HOUSE
h '
s*
3 d * 5 ' 3
^ \S ^
INCLUDING:
ROOM LABELS
OUST SAMPLE AREAS
ePAMToMlBEBi LOCATIONS
SAMWtO»WOOO FLOOR
HbMWillB>6
OUST AREA CALCULATION
MAIN ENTRANCE MARKED
ami environment
ni»l(iK\ iiiui Hivin»nmrni
<4
-------
XRF PAINT SCREENING FORM
HOME 10 NUMBS! ^ TECHNICIAN
SAMPLE MUN8GR ARTTHMMETTC MEAN OP READINGS 0514
DATE Mfff'-S
START TIME * Vs
END TIME ^
LOCATION 1
READING 1
READING 2
READING 3
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
PAMT IN THIS AREA IS:
_ INTACT
_ SUGHTTO MOOERATE PEBJNG
_ MOOERATE TO EXTRB4E PffiJNG
^
fWU
LOCATION 2
READING 1
READING 2
READING 3
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
PAINT IN THIS AREA IS:
_ INTACT
_ SLIGHT TO MOOERATE PfflJNG
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PEELING
Xs
LOCATION 3
READING 1 1
READING 2
READING 3
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
PAMT IN THIS AREA IS:
INTACT
_ SUGHTTO MOOERATE PEELING
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PEELING
-JL
. . w»<¦
LOCATION 4
REAOING 1 iili
READING 2
REAOING 3-
i.A
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
PAMT IN THIS AREA IS:
_ INTACT
_ SUGHTTO MOOBUTE PEEUNG
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PEELING
Vs
AkL
LOCATION 5
READING 1
REAOING 2
REAOING 3
PAMT IN THIS AREA IS:
_ INTACT
_ SLIGHT TO MOOERATE PEELING
MOOERATE TO EXTREME PEELING
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
-------
VACUUM OUST SAMPLING FORM
SAMPLE LOCATION 10: _E£] SOb SAMPLE KVS: ^U*l ft
DATE: "UAl TIME:
SAMPLER: rr^'c -
I OF CHILDREN IN HOME: 3
TOTAL AREA SAMPLED: ^ FT*.
REMEBER TO:
• LABEL SAMPLE JARS
• MARK SAMPLE AREAS ON FIGURE 2
• CHANGE VACUUM FLTER AND DECON VACUUM.
NOTES:
DRINKING WATER SAMPLING FORM
SAMPLE ID: ^
DATE COLLECTS): IIT*
TIME COLLECTED: STUB
DATE SAMPLE PICKED UP:
TIME SAMPLE PICKS) UP;
PRESERVATIVE AOOED:
PLUMBING:
COPPER ^ GALVANIZED PVC LEAD
NOTES:
recycled paoer
recvcieo paoer
recvcMO oaoer
ornlog* mill en*irmim«»t»i
rculotC* nnti emininmrw
f«oiotv «no en won mem
-------
SAMPLING SUMMARY INFORMATION SHEET
CIRCLE SMELTING JULY 1995
SAMPLE LOCATION ID: NHp
DAT& TlMfc CMOC
SAMPLER: £«*£
SOIL SAMPLE JO'S: fcUflsO
WATER SAMPLE ID'S: E-* ? u
HOUSE INFORMATION
ONE STORY BRICK
; two ypogy wood frame
^ SIDING
FENCED
_L DOGS
DUST SAMPLE ID'S: r>
SWING SET
POOL
OTHER
INHABITANTS 4
NUMBER OF ADULTS: 4
NUMBER OF CHILDREN: _g
AGES OF CMLDREN:
FIGURE 1 EXTERIOR OF HOUSE
RCCDBIRB? / ,
\J, MAIN BUILDING ^ SAMPLE LOCATIONS N_ PLAY AREAS
2L BOUNDARY OF LOT ___ SIDE WALKS/DRWE WAYS _v_ EXPOSB) SOIL
SIDE WALKS GARAGES/SHEDS _v_ RAIN SPOUTS
-------
FIGURE 2 INTERIOR FLOOR PLAN OF HOUSE
4-—"
\
x
i v \ ,\^ ^
1 xt* * Y_\'
X
~ i
VM* -
o-
^ So^?L£ ^ A-(bos? ^cic h
INCLUDING:
ROOM LABELS OUST AREA CALCULATION
OUST SAMPLE AREAS MAIN ENTRANCE MARKS)
LOCATIONS
Z-0WB5
.,,__ ntul niMninnieni
WOOD FLOOR 11M<1
'^otocr and environ mem
-------
XRF PAINT SCREENING FORM
HOME 10 NUM8ER TECHNICIAN K
SAMPLE MUN8S< AWTHMMETICMEAN Of READINGS .QATK}.\
DATE ^Tl ;
START TIME
CMn TTMP CP\
LOCATION 1
READING 1 "S0tt>5/ ¦)
READING 2
READING 3
PAINT IN THIS AREA IS:
_ INTACT
_ SLIGHT TO MOOERATE PEELING
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PSJNG
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE: W.JltW ^ j M
READING 1 ,cc* f ^
READING 2
READING 3
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
LOCATION 2
PAINT IN THIS AREA IS:
_ INTACT
_ SUGHT TO MOOERATE PEELING
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PSJNG
>&LJ Q-jVsJa 0 f
LOCATION 3
READING 1 -o0*- /.3 PAMT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 INTACT
REAOING 3 _ SUGHT TO MOOERATE PEELING
_ MOOBUTE TO EXTREME PEBJNG
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE 'WotQ-
LOCATION 4
READING 1 '°4q/'-oS PAWT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 _ INTACT
READING 3 _ SLIGHT TO MOOERATE PEBJNG
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PfflJNG
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE: SjuU
LOCATION 5
READING 1 /.2> PAINT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 ' _ INTACT
READING 3 _ SLIGHT TO MOOERATE PSJNG
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PEBJNG
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
-------
VACUUM DUST SAMPLING FORM
SAMPLE LOCATION 10:
DATE: iKo TIME:
SAMPLER:
S0tt SAMPLE 10'S:
t OF CHILDREN IN HOME:
TOTAL AREA SAMPLED: \L> FT*.
REMEBER TO:
• I ABfl SAMPLE JARS
• MARK SAMPLE AREAS ON FIGURE 2
• CHANGE VACUUM FILTBl AND DECON VACUUM.
SAMPLE 0:
DATE COLLECTED: DTP
TIME COLLECTED: . M>> "5
DATE SAMPLE PIOCB) UP: IflO
TIME SAMPLE PICKED UPtfftOtN
PRESERVATIVE AOOB3: J
PLUMBING:
COPPER GALVANIZED PVC LEAD
NOTES:
DRINKING WATER SAMPUNG FORM
NOTES:
'ecycled paper
recvcieo pacer
ecvcma oaoer
nn
-------
SAMPLING SUMMARY INFORMATION SHEET
CIRCLE SMELTING JULY 1995
SAMPLE
DATE:
SAM
IPLELOCATION 10 S.VR
11SSL
HOUSE INFORMATION
*¦ ONE STORY BRKX
TWO STORY WOOD FRAME
i SIDING
N_ F04CED
SWING SET
DOGS POOL
OTHER
SOL SAMPLE ID'S: {Wife.
WATER SAMPLE ID'S: ?LU1 vil
DUST SAMHE ID'S: gUTS"
IfXABfTANTS
NUMBER OP ADULTS: ^
NUMBER OP CH&DREN: 15
AGES OF OttLDREN:
FIGURE 1 EXTERIOR OF HOUSE
•rsxZ
»
-------
FIGURE 2 INTERIOR FLOOR PLAN OF HOUSE
to or
INCLUDING:
ROOM LABELS DUST AREA CALCULATION
DUST SAMPLE AREAS MAIN ENTRANCE MARKED
LOCATIONS
rrulo|E> (iiul emtn>nmt'tii
— WOOD FLOOR
4i-ol4»c> ftfttI fminuimrui
vimocy ana environment
-------
XRF PAINT SCREENING FORM
vtovsa.
HOME 10 NUM8ER ____ TECHNICIAN
SAMPLE MUNB8I AfVTHMMETIC MEAN Of READINGS
DATE
START TIME
ENO TIME
LOCATION 1
READING 1 PAMT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 _ INTACT
READING 3 _ SLIGHT TO MOOERATE PEELING
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PSJNG
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
LOCATION 2
READING 1 PAINT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 _ INTACT
READING 3 _ SLIGHT TO MOOERATE PEELING
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PEELING
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE
LOCATION 3
READING 1 PAINT IN THIS AREA IS:
REAOING 2 _ INTACT
READING 3 _ SLIGHT TO MOOERATE PEELING
_ MOOBUTE TO EXTREME PSUNG
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE - -
LOCATION 4
READING 1 PAMT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 __ INTACT
READING 3 ______ _ SUGHT TO MOOBUTE PEELING
_ MOOBUTE TO EXTREME PEELING
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE
LOCATION S
READING 1 PAJNT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 _ INTACT
READING 3 _ SLIGHT TO MOOBUTE PSJNG
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PEELING
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE
-------
pf-
SAMPU.L0CAT70N 10:
PAT&n[l*i-6 TIME;
SAMPLER; r^LTM^
# OF CHILDREN IN HOME: ^
TOTAL AREA SAMPLED: ^-Q FT*.
REMEBER TO:
• LABEL SAMPLE JARS
• MARK SAMPLE AREAS ON FIGURE 2
• CHANGE VACUUM FILTER ANO OECON VACUUM.
NOTES:
VACUUM OUST SAMPUNG FORM
_ ~SML SAMPLE 10'S:
140?
DRINKING WATER SAMPUNG FORM
SAMPLE 10:
DATE COLLECTED:
TIME COLLECTS}: OW^
DATE SAMPLE PICKS) UP: ~M2P
TIME SAMPLE PICKED UP: UTO
PRESERVATIVE AOOED:
PLUMBING:
COPPW GALVANIZED PVC LEAD
NOTES:
recycled paper
•ecvciefl caper
ecvciea paoer
ornlom iiml cnviniftfnfiii
t-vuUtg* itiut
Hi'iiutfV anfl »niimnm»nt
-------
SAMPLING SUMMARY INFORMATION SHEET
CIRCLE SMELTING JULY 1995
SAMPLE
DATE:
SAMPLER:
,T10N IP:EH MB
TIME; mi$
£±£
JSg INFORMATION
IE STORY BWCK
TWO STORY WOOD FRAME
2 SIDING
I ID'S:
Ip. BWlflMH
PLEID'S: ttutn- -
DtlST SAMPLE ID'S: NQ^T
SOIL SAMPLE _
. ftrtlbSP,
WATER SAMPLE ID'S: g u 10 Ell .^T
± FENCED
DOGS
Y_ SWING SET
POOL
OTHER
INHABITANTS n
NUMBER OF ADULTS: >
NUMBER OF CH&DREN: __
AGES OF CHILDREN: ?
FIGURE 1 EXTERIOR OF HOUSE
r\\l
4.
1*
r>J
£
4
t.
s
7*
l
6
J
INCLUDING:
MAIN BUILDING
BOUNDARY OF LOT
SIDE WALKS
SAMPLE LOCATIONS
SIDE WALKS/DRIVE WAYS
GARAGES/SHEDS
PlAY AREAS
EXPOS8) SOIL
RAM SPOUTS
-------
FIGURE 2 INTERIOR FLOOR PLAN OF HOUSE
K £»w
INCLUDING:
ROOM LABELS OUST AREA CALCULATION
OUST SAMPLE AREAS MAIN ENTRANCE MARKED
__[efVMI0pfifiREEN LOCATIONS
ccmIok* and environmi'iii
^^ FLOOR cr«»ioc> mill pfivirmimriii
miiocY ana envmmmeni
-------
HOME 10 NUMBER
SAMPLE MUNBER
DATE
START TIME
END TIME _
XRF_PAINT SCREENING EORM
TECHNICIAN _
AfVTHMMETIC MEAN OF READINGS
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
LOCATION 1
READING 1 .
READING 2
READING 3
PAINT IN THIS AREA IS:
_ INTACT
_ SUGHT TO MOOERATE PfflJNG
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PEELING
LOCATION 2
READING 1 PAINT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 _ INTACT
READING 3 ¦ _ SUGHT TO MODERATE PEELING
MOOERATE TO EXTREME PEELING
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
LOCATION 3
READING 1 PAINT IN THIS AREA IS:
HEADING 2 _ INTACT
READING 3 __ SUGHT TO MOOERATE PEELING
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PEELING
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE: , .
LOCATION 4
READING 1
READING 2
READING 3
PAMT IN THIS AREA IS:
_ INTACT
_ SUGHT TO MOOBUTE PEELING
_ MOO0UTE TO EXTREME POLING
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
LOCATION 5
READING 1 PAMT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 v _ INTACT
READING 3 _ SLIGHT TO MOOERATE PEELING
MOOERATE TO EXTREME PEELING
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
-------
VACUUM DUST SAMPLING FORM
c^iv' KjjO^
SAMPLE LOCATION 10: SON. SAMPLE ID'S:
DATE: TIME: ~
SAMPLER: '
» OF CHILDREN IN HOME:
TOTAL AREA SAMPLED: FT*.
REMEBER TO:
• LABEL SAMPLE JARS
• MARX SAMPLE AREAS ON FIGURE 2
• CHANGE VACUUM FILTER ANO DECON VACUUM.
NOTES:
DRINKING WATER SAMPLING FORM
SAMPLE ID:
DATE COLLBTTED:
TIME COLLECTED:
DATE SAMPLE PtCKEDUP: ~t\0
TIME SAMPLE PICKED UP:
PRESERVATIVE ADDED:
PLUMBING:
COPPB* __ GALVANIZED PVC LEAD
NOTES:
recyclea paper nml emin.nm.Mii
-ecvciea Ddp^r milinc* »*'«l fmimnmpni
recvcwo D30#r -f0«0€* and nivironmeni
-------
SAMPLING SUMMARY INFORMATION SHEET
CIRCLE SMELTING JULY 1995
SAMPLE LOCATION 10: VM < \
OATE nMfcjQBU
SAMPLER;
SOIL SAMPLE 10'S: KH1ISR RUU
WATER SAMPLE ID'S: RUll iiJ £
^ .^OUSg INFORMATION
CONfi-S70RV
TWO STORY
FWCED
DOGS
BNCX
WOOD FRAME
X SIDING
SWING SET
POOL
OTHER
OUST SAMPI£ ID'S: MOkly
INHABITANTS
NUMBER OF ADULTS:
NUMBER OF OBLDREN:
AGES OF CHILDREN:
2.
FIGURE 1 EXTBUOR OF HOUSE
MAIN BUILDING
BOUNDARY OF LOT .
SIDE WALKS
SAMPLE LOCATIONS
StOE WALKS/DRWE WAYS
GARAGES/SHEDS
PLAY AREAS
exposb) son.
RAM SPOUTS
-------
FIGURE 2 INTERIOR FLOOR PLAN OF HOUSE
INCLUDING:
ROOM LABELS OUST AREA CALCULATION
DUST SAMPLE AREAS MAIN ENTRANCE MARKED
__r£AJMT[S6REB4 LOCATIONS mill environment
— QMWWogrWOOO FLOOR
ano ennronmciit
-------
XRF PAINT SCREENING FORM
Kio €.v
HOME ID NUMBS TECHNICIAN
SAMPLE MUN8ER ARTTHMMETIC MEAN OF READINGS
DATE
START TIME
END TIME
LOCATION 1
READING 1 PAINT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 _ INTACT
REAOING 3 _ SLIGHT TO MODERATE PEELING
MODERATE TO EXTREME PEELING
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
LOCATION 2
READING 1 PAINT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 _ INTACT
READING 3 _ SLIGHT TO MODERATE PEELING
MOOERATE TO EXTREME PEELING
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
LOCATION 3
REAOING 1 PAMT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 _ INTACT
READING 3 _ SLIGHT TO MOOERATE PEELiNG
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PEELING
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE: -
LOCATION 4
READING 1 PAMT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 _ INTACT
REAOING .3 _ SLIGHT TO MOOERATE PGELING
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PEELING
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
LOCATION 5
READING 1 PAWT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 _ INTACT
READING 3 _ SLIGHT TO MOOERATE PEELING
MOOERATE TO EXTREME PEELING
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
-------
C.fcg.V/0 ,^oV
VACUUM DUST SAMPI
Ua*-l
SAMPUNG FORM
SAMPLE LOCATION 10:
SOS. SAMPLE ICS:
DATE:
SAMPLER:
TIME:
I OF CHILDREN IN HOME:
TOTAL AREA SAMPLED:
FT*.
REMEBER TO:
• LABB. SAMPLE JARS
• MARK SAMPLE AREAS ON FIGURE 2
• CHANGE VACUUM FILTER AND OECON VACUUM.
SAMPLE 10: \hH7
DATE COLLECTED: SIlO
TIME COLLECTED: _
DATE SAMPLE PICKED UP: MS~
TIME SAMPLE PICKED UP:
PRESERVATIVE ADOS): ivWb-.
PLUMBING:
y1
COPPER GALVANIZED PVC LEAD
NOTES:
DRINKING WATER SAMPUNG FORM
NOTES:
recvcled paper
'ecvcieo Daoer
ecvcieo oaoer
iiih! en*in»«m«*ni
• nmi mvm»mnr«i
rcoiufy ano environment
-------
SAMPLE
DATE:
SAMPLER:
•LE LOCATION 10:
* ~iTd TIME:_LM1
rt r-
SAMPLING SUMMARY INFORMATION SHEET
CIRCLE SMELTING JULY 1995
SOIL SAMPLE ID'S: _j^^3
WATER SAMPLE ID'S:
HOUSE INFORMATION
ONE STORY BRICK
TWO STORY WOOD FRAME
\ . SIDING
FENCED A\f\
\ SWING SET
DOGS POOL
OTHER
OUST SAMPLE ID'S:
INHABITANTS
NUMBER OF ADULTS
NUMBER OF CHILDREN
AGES OF CHILDREN
*: ^
FIGURE 1 EXTERIOR OF HOUSE
JCEUBIHB!
MAIN BUILDING
80UN0ARY OF LOT
SIDEWALKS
SAMPLE LOCATIONS
SIOE WALKS/DRIVE WAYS
GARAGES/SHEDS
PLAY AREAS
EXPOSS) SOIL
RAIN SPOUTS
-------
FIGURE 2 INTERIOR FLOOR PLAN OF HOUSE
INCLUDING:
ROOM LABELS OUST AREA CALCULATION
OUST SAMPLE AREAS MAIN ENTRANCE MARKED
PAINT SCREEN LOCATIONS
GARRET A8r WOOD FLOOR
ami pnunmmeiii
PfcAVcllflEASr him! fn»tninm«Mii
-------
XRF PAINT SCREENING FORM
HOME 10 NUMBER TECHNICIAN _____
SAMPLE MUN8ER ARfTHMMETIC MEAN Of READINGS
DATE
START TIME
ENO TIME
LOCATION 1
READING 1 PAINT IN THIS AREA IS.
READING 2 _ INTACT
READING 3 _ SUGHT TO MODERATE PBBJNG
_ MODERATE TO EXTREME PEELING
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
LOCATION 2
READING 1 PAINT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 __ INTACT
READING 3 _ SUGHT TO MODERATE PEELING
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PSJNG
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE
LOCATION 3
READING 1 PAINT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 _ INTACT
READING 3 _ SUGHT TO MOOERATE PEELING
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PEELING
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
LOCATION 4
READING 1 PAINT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 _ INTACT
READING 3 _ SUGHT TO MOOERATE PSUNG
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PEELING
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
LOCATION 5
READING 1 PAINT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 _ INTACT
READING 3 _ SUGHT TO MOOERATE PSJNG
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PEELING
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
-------
VACUUM OUST SAMPLING FORM
SAMPLE LOCATION 10: SOIL SAMPLE ID'S:
DATE: TIME:
SAMPLER:
f OF CHILDREN IN HOME:
TOTAL AREA SAMPLED: FT*.
REMEBER TO:
• 1 fiAMH F JARS
• MARK SAMPLE AREAS ON FIGURE 2
• CHANGE VACUUM FILTER ANO DECON VACUUM.
NOTES:
DRINKING WATER SAMPLING FORM
SAMPLE ID:
DATE COLLECTED:
TIME COLLECTED:
DATE SAMPLE PICXED UP:
TIME SAMPLE PICKS UP:
PRESERVATIVE ADDED:
PLUMBING:
COPPER GALVANIZED PVC LEAD
NOTES:
recycled paper
'ecvciea pap«r
pnvininmeiH
ci-ulugv ttnd rmimnmrni
-------
SAMPLING SUMMARY INFORMATION SHEET
CIRCLE SMELTING JULY 1995
SAMPLE LOCATION ID:
DATE; ijlQ TTMfc 0^ ^
SAMPLflfc TvK
A
HOUSE INFORMATION
ONE STORY BRICK
TWO STORY WOOD FRAME
SIDING
FENCED
SWING SET
DOGS POOL
OTHER
SOIL SAMPLE ID'S: ffiS?. 8P$&
WATER SAMPLE ID'S:
•
DUST SAMPLE ID'S:
« .
INHABITANTS
NUMBER OF ADULTS:
NUMBER OF CHMDREN:
AGES OF CHILDREN:
FIGURE 1 EXTERIOR OF HOUSE
MAIN BUILDING SAMPLE LOCATIONS PLAY AREAS
BOUNOARY OF LOT S0E WAUCSiDRWE WAYS EXPOSED SOB.
SIDE WALKS GARAGES/SHEDS RAIN SPOUTS
-------
FIGURE 2 INTERIOR FLOOR PLAN OF HOUSE
1
INCLUDING:
ROOM LABELS
OUST SAMPLE AREAS
_ RAWiCc££BSB4 LOCATIONS
_ GAflPST (QBeWOOD FLOOR
FkAfeABGtt
DUST AREA CALCULATION
MAIN ENTRANCE MARKS)
cruloKv ami envirunmnti
n-nlotf* hihI entirmtmctii
i^oIocy and rnwonmcni
-------
XRF PAINT SCREENING FORM
HOME 10 NUMBER TECHMGAN
SAMPLE MUNBER AMTHMMETIC MEAN Of READINGS
DATE
START TIME
END TIME.
LOCATION 1
READING 1 PAINT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 _ INTACT
READING 3 _ SLIGHT TO MOOERATE PEBJNG
__ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PEELING
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
LOCATION 2
READING 1 PAMT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 _ INTACT
READING 3 _____ _ SLIGHT TO MOOERATE PEBJNG
_ MOOERATE TO EXTROIE PEBJNG
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
LOCATION 3
READING 1 PAMT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 __ MTACT
READINGS _ SLIGHT TO MOOERATE PEELING
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PEELING
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
LOCATION 4
REAOMG 1 PAMT M TVRS AREA IS:
READMG 2 _ INTACT
READING 3 _ SUGHT TO MOOERATE PEELING
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PSJNG
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
LOCATION 5
READING 1 PAMT IN THIS AREA IS:
READMG 2 INTACT
READING 3 _ SLIGHT TO MOOBIATE PEELING
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PEELING
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
-------
VACUUM OUST SAMPLING FORM
SAMPLE LOCATION 10: SOL SAMPLE ID'S:
DATE TIME:
SAMPLER:
# OF CHILDREN IN HOME:
TOTAL AREA SAMPLED: FT*.
REMEBER TO:
• LABO. SAMPLE JARS
• MARK SAMPLE AREAS ON FIGURE 2
• CHANGE VACUUM FILTER ANO DECON VACUUM.
NOTES:
DRINKING WATER SAMPLING FORM
SAMPLE 10:
DAT! COLLECTED:
TIME COLLECTS:
DATE SAMPLE PICXED UP:
TIME SAMPLE PICXED UP:
PRESERVATIVE AOOB>:
PLUMBING:
COPPER GALVANIZED PVC LEAD
NOTES:
recycled paper
-------
SAMPUNG SUMMARY INFORMATION SHEET
CIRCLE SMELTING JULY 1995
SAMPLE LOCATION ID:
DATE: 7/1 ft TTU& (24^
SAMPLER: r S- g
HOUSED
EJNQ2I
ONE STORY X BRICK
WU blUKT) WOOO FRAME
FB4CED
DOGS
Rmation
ac
wo
SKMNG
SWING SET
POOL
OTHER
SOO. SAMPLE 10'S:
WAT® SAMPLE 10'S:
OUST SAMPLE 10'S:
IW
-------
FIGURE 2 INTERIOR FLOOR PLAN OF HOUSE
INCLUDING:
ROOM LABELS DUST AREA CALCULATION
DUST SAMPLE AREAS MAIN ENTRANCE MARKED
RMMVdSfiWEN LOCATIONS (M'otoicv iimi emirmimoin
CABRBBQfMtfOOD FLOOR iiml rmirnnmrnt
n ulocv and environment
-------
XRF PAINT SCREENING FORM
HOME » NUMBS
SAMPLE MUNBER ,
DATE
TECHMCIAN
AATTHMMETIC MEAN OF READMGS
START TJMB.
0O TIME _
LOCATION 1
READING 1
READING 2
READING 3
PAINT IN THIS AREA IS:
_ intact
_ SUGHT TO MOOBIATE PGBJNG
_ MOOBIATE TO EXTREME PEELING
DESCRIPTION OF TWS SURFACE:
READING 1
READING 2
READING 3
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
READING 1
READING 2
READMG 3
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
READING 1
READMG 2
READING 3
DESCRIPTION OP TH» SURFACE:
LOCATION 2
PAMT IN THIS AREA IS:
_ INTACT
_ SUGHT TO MOOGRATE PEBJNG
_ MOOBIATE TO EXTREME PGBJNG
LOCATION 3
PAMT IN TMS AREA IS:
_ INTACT
_ SUGHT TO MODERATE
_ MOOBIATE TO EXTREME
LOCATION 4
PAMT IN THIS AREA IS:
_ INTACT
_ SUGHT TO MOOBIATE
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME
LOCATION 5
READMG 1
READMG 2
READMG 3
PAMT M TMS AREA IS:
_ INTACT
__ SUGHT TO MOOBIATE PGBJNG
_ MOOBIATE TO EXTREME PEELING
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
-------
VACUUM OUST SAMPLING FORM
SAMPLfi LOCATION 10: SOIL SAMPLE ID'S:
0ATE:IlliJ2f TIME:
SAMPIBI:
# OF CHILDREN IN HOME: —"
TOTAL AREA SAMPLED: ^ iA FT*.
REMEBER TO:
• IAB& SAMPLE JARS
• MARK SAMPLE AREAS ON FIGURE 2
• CHANGE VACUUM FILTER AND DECON VACUUM.
NOTES:
DRINKING WATER SAMPLING FORM
SAMPLE 10:
DATE COLLECTED:
TIME COLLECTED:
DATE SAMPLE PICKED UP:
TIME SAMPLE PICKED UP:
PRESERVATIVE AOOED:
PLUMBING:
COPPER GAtVAMZED PVC LEAD
NOTES:
f6CYCl6d p3D©f itini emtn»nm«*ni
'ecvcieo OaO©r »ruin** mxi cnwrimmcni
'9CVOM Moer ano environment
-------
SAMPUNG SUMMARY INFORMATION SHEET
CIRCLE SMELTING JULY 1995
SAMPLE
DATE: _I
SAMPLER.'
liOCA'
LUfL.
v
TON IO
:Wl
TIME:
iW
HOUSE INFORMATION
ONESTORY BRICK
TWO STORY WOOD FRAME
SIDING
FENCED
SVMN6 SET
OOGS POOL
OTHER
OC-PC-I J " ,
WATER SAMPLE ID'S: OtTf
INHABITANTS
NUMBER OF ADULTS:
NUMBS* OF CHLOfBl:
AGES OF CHKDRBI:
FIGURE 1 EXTERIOR OF HOUSE
BOUNDARY OF LOT SIDE WALKS/DRIVE WAYS EXPOSE) SOL
SIDEWALKS GARAGES/SHEDS RAM SPOUTS
-------
FIGURE 2 INTERIOR FLOOR PLAN OP HOUSE
INCLUOING:
ROOM LABELS OUST AREA CALCULATION
OUST SAMPLE AREAS MAIN ENTRANCE MARKED
_ r&UMS SGKEN LOCATIONS t'ciiluiE* mitl environment
GAMWcflBfeWOOD FLOOR rcoiogi mill emininmrui
PMAMUMM and rnvvonm«ni
-------
XRF PAINT SCREENING FORM
HOME tO NUMBER TECHNICIAN
SAMPLE MUNBBt AfVTHMMETIC MEAN OF READINGS
DATE.
START TIME
END TIME
LOCATION 1
READING 1 PAINT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 _ INTACT
READING 3 _ SLIGHT TO MOOERATE PEEUNG
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PEELING
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
LOCATION 2
READING 1 PAMT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 _ INTACT
READING 3 _ SLIGHT TO MOOERATE PEELING
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PEBJNG
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
LOCATION 3
READING 1 PAINT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 _ INTACT
READING 3 _ SLIGHT TO MOOERATE PEELING
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PfflJNG
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
LOCATION 4
READMG 1 PAMT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 _ INTACT
READING 3 _ SLIGHT TO MOOERATE PEELING
_ MOOBMTE TO EXTREME PSUNG
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
LOCATION 5
READING 1 PAINT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 _ INTACT
READING 3 _ SLIGHT TO MOOERATE PSJNG
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PEEUNG
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
-------
VACUUM OUST SAMPLING FORM
SAMPLE LOCATION K>: _
DATE: TMK _
SAMPLSfc
t OF CHILDREN IN HOME:
TOTAL AREA SAMPLED:
FT*.
TO:
• iin SAMPLE JAM
• MARK SAMPLE AREAS ON FIGURE 2
• CHANQC VACUUM ALTER AND OCCON VACUUM.
ns4 *¦
£
Vff i
NOTES:
i
Watbi smwpunq fmm
SAMPLED:
DATE
DATE SAMPLE PICKED UP; > - -- ,
"HME SAMPLE PICMD UP; ^
PRESBIVATIVE AOOSfc
1 " *
PLUMBING: .. v
~.T '•€ r T _ . . '
PVC LEAD
'« . . ''
*'¦" v * ' - -v/r,:A;ri *, 1%
. : ¦ v*
recycled paper
recycled paper
recvcieo paper
rroluyy ami wninwww
rnihyt ami m*iriwnwM
rcataar «nI
-------
FIGURE 2 INTERIOR FLOOR PLAN OF HOUSE
INCLUDING:
ROOM LABELS OUST AREA CALCULATION
DUST SAMPLE AREAS MAIN ENTRANCE MARKED
GMHf (SCREEN LOCATIONS rrolog\ mid emtrmimrni
HiWWT)O»W00D FLOOR tinloK* mid emtnmmciii
PtaMMJiaAS rfotof* and rnwonmeni
-------
SAMPLING SUMMARY INFORMATION SHEET
CIRCLE SMELTING JULY 1995
SAMPLE
DATE;
SAMI
IPLE LOCATION IO:
E TTME: ^00 .
iPLgrti
SOB. SAMPLE
HOUSE INFORMATION dlfc
ONE STORY BUCK
TWO STORY WOOD FRAME
SIDING
FENCED
SWING SET
DOGS POOL
OTHER
INHABITANTS
NUMBS! OP AOULTS:
NUMBS OP CMLDREN:
AGES OP CHNJ)RB>I:
4
FIGURE 1 EXTERIOR OF HOUSE
InCCCBIRS:
JO. MAIN BUILDING
BOUNDARY(
A SIOE WALKS
X! SAMPLE LOCATIONS PLAY AREAS
' SIOE WALKS/DRIVE WAYS X. EXPOSED SOIL
_£ GARAGES/SHB)S 5L RAM SPOUTS
-------
XRF PAINT SCREENING FORM
HOME 10 NUM8S* TECHNICIAN
SAMPLE MUNBB! AMTHMMET1C MEAN OF READINGS
DATE
START TIME __
ENO TIME
LOCATION 1
READING 1 PA*fT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 _ INTACT
READING 3 _ SLIGHT TO MOOERATE PEBJNG
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PfflJNG
DESCRIPTION OP THIS SURFACE:
LOCATION 2
READING 1 PAINT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 _ INTACT
READING 3 _ SLIGHT TO MOOERATE PEBJNG
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PEBJNG
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
LOCATION 3
READING 1
READING 2.
READING 3
PACT IN THIS AREA IS:
_ INTACT
_ SLIGHT TO MOOERATE PEBJNG
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PSJNG
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
LOCATION 4
READING 1
READING 2.
READING 3
PANKT IN THIS AREA IS:
_ INTACT
_ SLIGHT TO MOOERATE PEBJNG
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PEBJNG
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
LOCATION 5
READING 1 PAINT IN THIS AREA IS:
READING 2 __ INTACT
READING 3 __ SUGHT TO MOOERATE PEBJNG
_ MOOERATE TO EXTREME PSJNG
DESCRIPTION OF THIS SURFACE:
-------
VACUUM OUST SAMPLING FORM ^
SAMPLE LOCATION 10: — _ SOB. SAMPLE ID'S:
OATE: mil:
SAMPLER: —
# OF CHILDREN IN HOME:
TOTAL A8EA SAMPLED: FT1.
REMEBER TO :
• LABEL SAMPLE JARS
• MARK SAMPLE AREAS ON FIGURE 2
• CHANGE VACUUM FILTER ANO DECON VACUUM.
NOTES:
DRINKING WATER SAMPLING FORM
SAMPLE 10: —
OATE COLLECTED:
TIME COLLECTS}:
DATE SAMPLE PICKED UP:
TIME SAMPLE PICKED UP:
PRESERVATIVE ADDED:
PLUMBING:
COPPER GALVANIZED PVC LEAD
NOTES:
recvcied paoer
-ecvciea oao«r
'ecvcted oao«'
tuning* nnil environment
rmWigv unit fn>inmmrm
and ennroomeni
-------
APPENDIX C
ANALYTICAL DATA PACKAGE
C-l
-------
ecology and environment, inc
international Specialists in the Environment
111 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago. Illinois 60604
Tel: (312) 663-9415, Fax: (312) 663-0791
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 12, 19 95
TO: Mike Mangini, TAT Project Manager, E & E, Chicago,
Illinois
FROM:
David Hendren, TAT Analytical Services Manager,
E Sc. E, Chicago, Illinois
THROUGH:
SUBJECT:
REFERENCE:
Mary Jane Ripp, TAT QA Reports Manager, E & E,
Chicago, Illinois
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Metals
Data Quality Assurance (QA) Review, Circle Smelting,
Beckemeyer, Clinton County, Illinois
Project TDD T05-9506-014 Analytical TDD T05-9506-809
Project PAN EIL0614VDA Analytical PAN EIL0614AGA
The data QA review of 20 water samples, 38 soil samples, and 9
dust samples collected from the Circle Smelting site is complete.
The samples were collected between July 18 and July 20, 1995, by
the Technical Assistance Team (TAT) contractor, Ecology and
Environment, Inc. (E & E). The samples were submitted to the
Analytical Services Center, Ecology and Environment, Inc.,
Lancaster, New York. The laboratory analyses were performed
according to United States Environmental Protection Agency Solid
Waste 846 Methods 6010 and 7471 (mercury). When necessary,
analyses for arsenic, lead, and selenium were performed following
methods 7060, 7421; and 7740, respectively. All of the soil
samples were reanalyzed following sample sieving, using a 100-
mesh sieve. Seven of the dust samples were sieved before
analysis and two were analyzed as received.
Sample Identification
TAT Laboratory
Identification No. Identification No.
Water
RH1WI 29986
RH1WF 29987
recycled oaoer
-------
Circle Smelting
Project TDD T05-9506-014
Analytical TDD T05-9506-809
Page 2
TAT
Identification No.
RH2WI
RH2WF
RH3WI
RH3WF
RH4WI
RH4WF
RH5WI
RH5WF
RH6WI
RH6WF
RH7WI
RH7WF
RH8WI
RH9WF
RH9WI
RH10WI
RH10WF
RH11WI
Soil
RH1SB
RH1SG
RH2SG
RH2SB
BES1SP
BES1SB
BES1SG
BPSP
BPSG
BPSB
RH3SB
RH3SG
RH4SB
RH5SG
RH5SB
RH6SB
RH6ASB
RH6SG
RH7SB
RH7ASB
RH7SP
RH7SG
RH8SG
RH8SB
RH9SB
Laboratory
Identification No.
29988
29989
29990
29991
29992
29993
29994
29995
29996
29997
29998
29999
30000
30001
30002
30003
30004
30005
Sieved
Total
30006
30533
30007
30534
30008
30535
30009
30536
30010
30537
30011
30538
30012
30539
30013
30540
30014
30541
30015
30542
30016
30543
30017
30544
30018
30545
30019
30546
30020
30547
30021
30548
30022
30549
30023
30550
30024
30551
30025
30570
30026
30552
30027
30553
30028
30554
30029
30555
30030
30556
-------
Circle Smelting
Project TDD T05-9506-014
Analytical TDD T05-9506-809
Page 3
TAT Laboratory
Identification No. Identication No.
RH9SG
30031
30557
RH10SP
30032
30558
RH10SP
30033
30559
RH10ASP
30034
30560
RH10SB
30035
30561
RH11SG
30036
30562
RH11SB
30038
30563
RH12SG
30037
30564
BCDC2SB
30039
30565
BCDC3SB
30040
30566
BCDC1SB
30041
30567
BCDC1SP
30042
30568
BCDC1SG
30043
30569
Dust
RHID
RH2D
RH3D
RH5D
RH6D
RH7D
RH8D
RH9D
BESID
Data Qualifications:
I. Sample Holding Time: Acceptable
The samples were collected between July 18 and July 20,
1995, and analyzed between August 2, 1995, and August 9,
1995. Holding time criteria, six months (28 days for
mercury) for all analytes, were met.
II. Calibration:
• Initial Calibration: Acceptable
Recoveries for the initial calibration verification were
within 90% to 110% (80% to 120% for mercury), as required.
• Continuing Calibration: Acceptable
30044
30045
30046
30047
30048
30049
30050
30051
30052
All analytes included in the continuing calibration
verification standard were within 90% to 110% recoveries
-------
Circle Smelting
Project TDD T05-9506-014
Analytical TDD T05-9506-809
Page 4
(80% to 120% for mercury), as required.
III. Blanks: Acceptable
A method blank (preparation blank) was analyzed with the
samples. No target analytes were detected in the blanks.
IV. Instrument Interference Check Samples (ICS): Acceptable
The ICS samples were analyzed before and after sample
analysis, as required, and were within quality control
limits.
V. Overall Assessment of Data for Use: Acceptable
The overall usefulness of the data is based on criteria for
QA Level II as outlined in the Office of Solid Waste and
Emergency Response (OSWER) Directive 9360.4-01 (April 1990)
Data Validation Procedures, Section 3.0, Metallic Inorganic
Parameters. Based upon the information provided, the data
are acceptable for use.
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
EPA SAMPLE NO.
SDG No.: 30006
Lab Sample ID: 30007
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/med): LOW
« % Solids: 100.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After:
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CAS No.
Analyte
Concent rat ion
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
5.5
P
7440-39-3
Barium
191
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
1.2
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
10.6
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
151
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.10
U
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.60
U
N
F
7440-22-4
Silver
1.7
U
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cy amide
NR
Texture:
Artifacts:
FORM I - IN ILM03.0
17
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
1 EPA SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT Contract:
RH1SG
Lab Code: EANDE_ Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.: SDG No.: 30533
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_ Lab Sample ID: 30534
Level !low/'med) : LOW Date Received: 07/22/95
* % Solids: _86.9
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Ant imony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
7 . 1
P
7440-39-3
Barium
264
*
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
0 . 64
U
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
LD
O
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
146
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury-
0.12
U
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0 .56
B
F
7440-22-4
Silver
1.9
U
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Color Before: Clarity Before: Texture: H
Color After: Y Clarity After: C Artifacts: _
Comments:
CLIENT SAMPLE ID: RH1SG-TOTAL
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
EPA SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
SDG No.: 30006
Lab Sample ID: 3 0006
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/med): LOW
*% Solids: 100.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After:
Comments:
'Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
5 . 0
P
7440-39-3
Barium
133
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
1.3
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
8.7
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
291
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.10
U
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.60
U
WN
F
7440-22-4
Silver
1.7
U
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture:
Artifacts:
FORM I - IN ILM03.0
ib
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
EPA SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLCGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Cede: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
SDG No.: 30533
Lab Sample ID: 30533
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/med): LOW
'% Solids: _87.5
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After: Y_
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
5.8
P
7440-39-3
Barium
153
~
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
1.1
B
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
9.5
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
394
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.11
U
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.67
B
F
7440-22-4
Silver
1.9
U
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture: H_
Artifacts:
CLIENT SAMPLE ID: RH1SB-TOTAL
FORM I - IN
ILM03 .0
-------
TAT
CHICAGO
TAT SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLCGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.-:
SDG No.: 30026
Lab Sample ID: 30044
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/med): LOW
% Solids: 100.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight) : MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After:
Comment s:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
7.2
P
7440-39-3
Barium
344
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
27 . 0
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
33.7
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
465
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.60
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
1.4
B
W
F
7440-22-4
Silver
3.8
U
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture:
Artifacts
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
EPA SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: E COLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contracc:
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
SDG No.
30006
Lab Sample ID: 30008
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/med): LOW
% Solids: 100.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After:
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
5.8
P
7440-39-3
Barium
136
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
1.2
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
CD
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
402
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury-
0.10
u
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.60
u
N
F
7440-22-4
Silver
2.2
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture:
Artifacts:
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
it*
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
EPA SAMPLE NO.
RH2SG
SDG NO.: 30533
Lab Sample ID: 3 053 5
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level flow/med) : LOW
% Solids: _82.6
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After:
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CAS No.
Analyte
Cone ent ra t i on
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Ant imony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
6.9
P
7440-39-3
Barium
182
*
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
1.0
B
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
7.6
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
380
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.12
U
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
1.1
B
F
7440-22-4
Silver
2.0
U
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture: H_
Artifacts:
CLIENT.SAMPLE ID: RH2SG-TOTAL
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
EPA SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Contract:
Lab Name: ECOLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
SDG No.: 30006
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_ Lab Sample ID: 30009
Level : low/'med) : LOW Date Received: 07/22/95
'% Solids: 100.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After:
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
6 . 9
P
7440-39-3
Barium
179
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
2.3
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
9.9
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
497
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.10
U
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.60
U
N
F
7440-22-4
Silver
1.7
U
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture:
Artifacts:
FORM I
IN
ILM03.0
lb
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECCLCGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
EPA SAMPLE NO.
RH2SB
SDG No.: 30533
Lab Sample ID: 30536
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/med): LOW
% Solids: _84.2
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After: Y_
Comment s:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
7 ,1
P
7440-39-3
Barium
267
*
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
3 . 0
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
15.5
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
649
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.12
u
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
1.1
B
F
7440-22-4
Silver
2.0
U
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture: H_
Artifacts:
CLIENT SAMPLE ID: RH2SB-TOTAL
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
1 TAT SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT Contract:
RH2D
Lab Code: EANCE_ Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.: SDG No.: 30026
Matrix . (soil/water) : SOIL_ Lab Sample ID: 30045
Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/22/95
% Solids: 100.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
4.8
P
7440-39-3
Barium
145
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
9.2
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
16.6
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
268
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.21
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0 .40
U
S
F
7440-22-4
Silver
1.7
U
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Color Before: Clarity Before: Texture:
Color After: Y Clarity After: C Artifacts:
Comments:
FORM I - IN ILM03.0
2J
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
1
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Contract:
EPA SAMPLE NO.
_,ab Name: ECOLCGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT
Lab Code: ZANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
SDG No.: 30006
Level (iow/med):
i
Lab Sample ID: 30017
Date Received: 07/22/95
latrix (soil/water): SOIL_
LOW
V Solids: 100.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
:olor Before:
Color After:
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
5.4
P
7440-39-3
Barium
207
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
1.2
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
9.2
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
453
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.10
U
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.60
U
WN
F
7440-22-4
Silver
1.7
U
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture:
Artifacts:
FORM I
IN
ILM03.0
z±
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
EPA SAMPLE NO.
RH3SG
SDG No.: 30533
Lab Sample ID: 30544
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water) : SOIL_
Level (low/med): LOW
% Solids: _82.8
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After:
Comments:
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
11.8
P
7440-39-3
Barium
239
*
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
1.1
B
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
14.2
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
734
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.12
U
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.98
B
F
7440-22-4
Silver
2.0
U
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Clarity Before:
Y Clarity After: C_
CLIENT SAMPLE ID: RH3SG-TOTAL
Texture: H_
Artifacts:
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
EPA SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
SDG No.: 30006
Lab Sample ID: 3 0016
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/med): LOW
* % Solids: 100.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
^ Color Before:
Color After:
Comments:
Clarity Before: _
Clarity After: C_
CAS No.
Analyte
Concent rat i on
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
7.7
P
7440-39-3
Barium
193
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
0.83
B
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
13 .4
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
174
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.10
U
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.60
u
WN
F
7440-22-4
Silver
1.7
u
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture:
Artifacts:
FORM I
IN
ILM03.0
-------
TAT
:hicago
EPA SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANDE case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
SDG NO.: 30533
Lab Sample ID: 30543
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/med): LOW
% Solids: _85.3
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After:
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Ant imony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
6.7
P
7440-39-3
Barium
224
~
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
0.66
u
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
14.6
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
140
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0 .12
u
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.73
B
F
7440-22-4
Silver
1.9
U
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture: H_
Artifacts:
CLIENT SAMPLE ID: RH3SB-TOTAL
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
TAT SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECGLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
SDG No.: 30046
Lab Sample ID: 3 0046
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level !low/med): LOW
* % Solids: 100.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After:
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
5.4
P
7440-39-3
Barium
89.3
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
3.7
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
14. 9
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
115
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.42
N*
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
1.9
+N
F
7440-22-4
Silver
3.1
U
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture:
Artifacts;
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
EPA SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLGGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.64S SAS No.:
SDG No.: 30006
Lab Sample ID: 3 0018
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/med): LOW
% Solids: 100.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
52.7
P
7440-39-3
Barium
93 . 3
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
2.4
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
43 .5
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
5240
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.10
U
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.60
U
WN
F
7440-22-4
Silver
5.7
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Color Before:
Color After:
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
Texture:
Artifacts:
FORM I - IN ILM03.0
2<2
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
* Lab Name: ZCOLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: SANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.-:
EPA SAMPLE NO.
SDG No.: 30533
Lab Sample ID: 3 0545
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level iicw/'med) : LOW
% Solids: _88 . 5
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
«!
T*
i
olor Before
,Color After:
I
^Comments:
# ==
i
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CLIENT SAMPLE ID: RH4SB-TOTAL
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
38.3
P
7440-39-3
Barium
72.6
»
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
2.3
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
31.0
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
4790
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury-
0.11
U
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
1.1
B
+
F
7440-22-4
Silver
5.6
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture: H_
Artifacts:
1
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
-------
TAT
CHICAGO
EPA SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
SDG NO.: 30006
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_ Lab Sample ID: 30019
Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/22/95
% Solids: 100.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After:
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Ant imony
NR
7440-30-2
Arsenic
8.2
P
7440-39-3
Barium
125
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
1.7
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
11.2
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
376
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.10
U
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.60
U
N
F
7440-22-4
Silver
1.7
U
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture:
Artifacts
FORM I
IN
ILM03.0
24
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
EPA SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Contract
Lab Name: ECCLCGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
SDG No.: 30533
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_ Lab Sample ID: 30546
Level (iow/med): LOW Date Received: 07/22/95
% Solids: _81.6
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After: Y_
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
9.6
P
7440-39-3
Barium
167
1r
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
1.1
B
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
10 .2
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
587
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0 .12
U
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.83
B
F
7440-22-4
Silver
2.0
U
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture: H_
Artifacts:
CLIENT SAMPLE ID: RH5SG-TOTAL
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
EPA SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLCGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
SDG No.: 30006
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_ Lab Sample ID: 30020
Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/22/95
'% Solids: 100.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Ant imony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
7.1
P
7440-39-3
Barium
104
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
1.2
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
7.7
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
356
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.10
U
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.60
U
N
F
7440-22-4
Silver
1.7
U
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Color Before:
Color After:
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
Texture:
Artifacts
FORM I - IN ILM03.0
2d
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
EPA SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
SDG No.: 30533
Lab Sample ID: 3 054 7
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/med): LOW
% Solids: J76.9
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before.-
Color After: Y_
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Ant imony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
12.7
P
7440-39-3
Barium
231
*
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
1.9
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
11.6
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
873
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.13
U
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
1.1
B
F
7440-22-4
Silver
2.5
B
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture: H_
Artifacts:
CLIENT SAMPLE ID: RH5SB-TOTAL
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
1 EPA SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT Contract:
RH6SG
Lab Cede: EANDE_ Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No..: SDG No.: 30006_
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_ Lab Sample ID: 30023
Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/22/95
% Solids: 100.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Ant imony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
4 .1
P
7440-39-3
Barium
108
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
0.56
U
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
7.0
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
166
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.10
u
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.60
u
WN
F
7440-22-4
Silver
1.7
u
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Color Before: Clarity Before: Texture:
Color After: Y Clarity After: C Artifacts:
Comments:
FORM I - IN ILM03.0
27
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLCGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
EPA SAMPLE NO.
SDG NO.: 3 053 3
Lab Sample ID: 30550
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/med): LOW
% Solids: _80.3
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After: Y_
Comments:
"Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C
CAS No.
Analyte
Concent rat i on
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
5.2
P
7440-39-3
Barium
129
*
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
0.70
U
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
7.2
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
236
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.12
U
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.78
B
F
7440-22-4
Silver
2.1
U
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture: H_
Artifacts:
CLIENT SAMPLE ID: RH6SG-TOTAL
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
EPA SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
RH6SB
SDG No.
30006
Lab Sample ID: 30021
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level ;iow/med): LOW
* % Solids: 100.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After-.
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
22.3
P
7440-39-3
Barium
306
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
1.8
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
11.8
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
2240
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
o
rl
O
U
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.60
u
N
F
7440-22-4
Silver
2.3
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture:
Artifacts:
FORM I
IN
ILM03.0
26
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
1 EPA SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT Contract:
RH6SB
Lab Code: EANDE_ Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.: SDG No.: 30533_
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_ Lab Sample ID: 30548
Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/22/95
% Solids: _76.3
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Ant imony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
19.1
P
7440-39-3
Barium
293
*
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
1.7
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
10.9
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
1750
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.13
U
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
1.2
B
F
7440-22-4
Silver
2.5
B
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Color Before: Clarity Before: Texture: H
Color After: Y Clarity After: C Artifacts; _
Comments:
CLIENT SAMPLE ID: RH6SB-TOTAL :
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: E COLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.-:
EPA SAMPLE NO.
RH6ASB
SDG No.: 30006
Matrix (soil/water) : SOIL_ Lab Sample ID: 3 0022
Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/22/95
% Solids: 100.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After:
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Ant imony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
24.2
P
7440-39-3
Barium
333
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
2.2
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
12.0
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
2410
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury-
0.19
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.60
B
N
F
7440-22-4
Silver
2.3
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture:
Artifacts
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
25
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
EPA SAMPLE NO.
SDG No.: 30533
Lab Sample ID: 3 0549
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/med): LOW
* % Solids: _78 . 7
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before: _
Color After: Y
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CLIENT SAMPLE ID: RH6ASB-TOTAL
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
23 .4
NR
7440-39-3
Barium
317
*
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
1.5
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
11.3
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
2820
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.23
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
1.3
B
F
7440-22-4
Silver
2.4
B
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture: H_
Artifacts:
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
-------
TAT
CHICAGO
TAT SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANEE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
SDG No.: 30046
Lab Sample ID: 30048
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/med): LOW
% Solids: 100.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After:
Comments:
CAS No.
Analyte
Concent rat i on
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
4.2
B
P
7440-39-3
Barium
97 .4
B
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
3.4
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
25.6
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
178
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.88
N*
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
1.0
U
N
F
7440-22-4
Silver
4.1
u
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
Texture:
Artifacts:
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
TAT SAMPLE NO.
SDG No.: 30026
Lab Sample ID: 30027
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/med): LOW
1 % Solids: 100.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After:
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
4 . 2
P
7440-39-3
Barium
150
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
1.9
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
5.7
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
227
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.10
U
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.85
B
F
7440-22-4
Silver
1.7
U
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture:
Artifacts:
FORM I - IN ILM03.0
24
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
1
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Contract:
TAT SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: ECOLOGY_AND_ENVTRONMENT
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
SDG No.: 30552
Lab Sample ID: 3 0553
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/med): LOW
% Solids: _84 . 8
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
CAS NO.
Analyte
Concent ra t i on
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-35-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
12 . 0
P
7440-39-3
Barium
691
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
1.2
B
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
20.1
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
1670
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.12
U
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
1.9
F
7440-22-4
Silver
3 .1
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Color Before: _
Color After: Y
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CLIENT SAMPLE ID: RH7SG-TOTAL
Texture: HOMOGE
Artifacts:
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
TAT SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLCGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
SDG No.: 30026
Lab Sample ID: 30026
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/mea): LOW
* % Solids: 100.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After: Y_
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentrat ion
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Ant imony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
3 . 9
P
7440-39-3
Barium
187
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
2.5
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
7.4
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
519
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.10
U
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.40
U
W
F
7440-22-4
Silver
1.7
U
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture:
Artifacts;
FORM I
IN
ILM03.0
25
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
TAT SAMPLE NC.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: E COLGGY_AND_ENVIRGNMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANCZ Case No.: 9501.S48 SAS No.:
RH7SP
SDG No.: 30552
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_ Lab Sample ID: 30552
Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/22/95
'% Solids: _85.9
Concentration Units {ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After:
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentrat ion
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Ant imony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
7.2
P
7440-39-3
Barium
346
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
1.3
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
11.6
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
623
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.12
U
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.70
u
W
F
7440-22-4
Silver
2.5
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture: HOMOGE
Artifacts:
CLIENT SAMPLE ID: RH7SP-TOTAL
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract: .
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.;
EPA SAMPLE NO.
SDG No.: 30006
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_ Lab Sample ID: 30024
Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/22/95
i
% Solids: 100.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After: Y_
Comments:
Clarity Before: _
Clarity After: C_
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
10 .6
P
7440-39-3
Barium
175
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
2.3
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
11.1
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
1750
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.10
u
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.61
B
N
F
7440-22-4
Silver
1.8
B
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture:
Artifacts:
FORM I - IN ILM03.0
z*
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLCGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Cede: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
EPA SAMPLE NO.
SDG No.: 30533
Lab Sample ID: 3 0551
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/med): LOW
% Solids: _81.3
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After: Y_
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
10.7
P
7440-39-3
Barium
192
*
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
1.4
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
8.9
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
1640
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.12
U
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
1.5
F
7440-22-4
Silver
2.0
U
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture: H_
Artifacts:
CLIENT SAMPLE ID: RH7SB-TOTAL
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
EPA SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
SDG No.: 30006
Lab Sample ID: 3 0025
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix ; soil/water) : SOIL_
Level (low/'med):. LOW
'% Solids: 100.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After: Y_
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CAS No.
Analyte
doncent rat ion
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Ant imony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
11.2
P
7440-39-3
Barium
168
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
2 .1
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
10 . 7
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
1690
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury-
o
H
O
U
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.60
U
N
F
7440-22-4
Silver
1.8
B
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture:
Artifacts
FORM I - IN ILM03.0
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
EPA SAMPLE NO.
SDG No.: 3 053 3
Lab Sample ID: 30570
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/med): LOW
*% Solids: _78 . 8
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
lolor Before:
Color After: Y_
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
15 .7
P
7440-39-3
Barium
203
~
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
2.1
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
11. 9
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
2170
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.16
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
1.4
F
7440-22-4
Silver
2.6
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture: H_
Artifacts:
CLIENT SAMPLE ID: RH7ASB-TOTAL
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
TAT SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
SDG No.: 30046
Lab Sample ID: 30049
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/med): LOW
% Solids: 100.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After:
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Ant imony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
20.5
P
7440-39-3
Barium
385
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
5.3
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
27 .4
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
508
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.34
N*
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0 .62
B
WN
F
7440-22-4
Silver
2.4
U
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture:
Artifacts:
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
TAT SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Contract:
Lab Name: ECOLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
RH8SG
SDG No.: 30026
Lab Sample ID: 3 0 028
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/mea): LOW
* % Solids: 100.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After:
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
3.6
P
7440-39-3
Barium
87.4
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
1. 9
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
5.0
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
185
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.10
U
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.46
B
F
7440-22-4
Silver
1.7
U
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture:
Artifacts:
FORM I - IN ILM03.0
27
-------
TAT
:hicago
TAT SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
SDG No.: 30552
Lab Sample ID: 30554
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water) : SOIL_
Level (low/med): LOW
<% Solids: J76.2
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After: Y_
Comments:
'Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
8.0
P
7440-39-3
Barium
138
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
0.73
U
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
10.7
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
298
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.13
u
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
1.2
B
F
7440-22-4
Silver
2.6
B
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture: HOMOGE
Artifacts:
CLIENT SAMPLE ID: RH8SG-TOTAL
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLCGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANEE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
TAT SAMPLE NO.
SDG No.: 30026
Lab Sample ID: 3 0029
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/'med) : LOW
'% Solids: 100.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After:
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
0.92
U
P
7440-39-3
Barium
228
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
3.5
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
8.2
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
903
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
o
H
O
U
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.63
B
F
7440-22-4
Silver
1.7
U
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture:
Artifacts:
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
_ 2 b
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
TAT SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: E COLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
SDG No.: 30552
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_ Lab Sample ID: 30555
Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/22/95
'% Solids: _86.3
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After:
Comment s:
Clarity Before:
Y Clarity After: C_
CLIENT SAMPLE ID: RH8SB-TOTAL
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
25 .1
P
7440-39-3
Barium
354
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
2.0
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
16.4
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
1530
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.12
U
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
2.1
F
7440-22-4
Silver
5.2
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture: HOMOGE
Artifacts:
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
1
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Contract:
TAT SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name:.ECOLCGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
SDG No.: 30046
Lab Sample ID: 3 0050
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/med): LOW
1 % Solids: 100.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
8.1
P
7440-39-3
Barium
210
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
4.0
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
17.3
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
244
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.37
N*
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.61
B
WN
F
7440-22-4
Silver
1.7
U
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Color Before:
Color After:
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
Texture:
Artifacts:
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
TAT SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Names: ECOLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Cede: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
SDG No.: 30026
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_ Lab Sample ID: 30031
Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/22/95
% Solids: 100.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After:
Comments:
Clarity.Before:
Clarity After: C_
CAS No.
Analyte
Concent rat i on
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Ant imony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
6.0
P
7440-39-3
Barium
145
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
1.1
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
6.7
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
32.4
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury-
0.10
U
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.40
U
F
7440-22-4
Silver
1.7
U
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture:
Artifacts:
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
2d
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
TAT SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECCLCGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: SANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
SDG No.: 30552
Lab Sample ID: 30557
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/mea): LOW
*% Solids: _85 . 9
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before: _
Color After: Y
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CLIENT SAMPLE ID: RH9SG-TOTAL
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
7.4
P
7440-39-3
Barium
272
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
0 . 65
U
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
9.7
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
72 . 7
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.12
u
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.70
B
F
7440-22-4
Silver
2.8
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture: HOMOGE
Artifacts:
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
TAT SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name:,ECOLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT ConcracC:
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
SDG No.: 30026
Lab Sample ID: 3 003 0
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/med): LOW
% Solids: 100.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After:
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Ant imony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
5.9
P
7440-39-3
Barium
130
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
1.2
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
7.7
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
153
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.10
U
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.40
U
W
F
7440-22-4
Silver
1.7
U
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture:
Artifacts
FORM I - IN ILM03.0
2d
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
1
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Contract:
TAT SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: E COLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT _
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.S48 SAS No.:
SDG No.
30552
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_ Lab Sample ID: 30556
Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/22/95
'% Solids: _86 . 5
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
6.8
P
7440-39-3
Barium
134
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
0.65
u
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
9.7
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
128
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.12
u
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.74
B
F
7440-22-4
Silver
2.5
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Color Before:
Color After:
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C
Texture: HOMOGE
Artifacts:
CLIENT SAMPLE ID: RH9SB-TOTAL
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
TAT SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Contract:
Lab Name: ECOLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
RH10SG
SDG No.: 30026
Lab Sample ID: 3 0033
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/med): LOW
* % Solids: 100.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After.-
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After.- C_
CAS No.
Analyte
Concent rat i on
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Ant imony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
3.1
P
7440-39-3
Barium
114
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
0.97
B
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
6.0
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
13 .2
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury-
o
O
U
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.40
U
F
7440-22-4
Silver
1.7
U
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture:
Artifacts;
FORM I - IN ILM03.0
18
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
TAT SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Contract;
Lab Name: ECOLCGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
SDG No.: 30552
Lab Sample ID: 3 055 9
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/med): LOW
'% Solids: _76.8
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After: Y_
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
6.3
P
7440-39-3
Barium
188
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
0.73
U
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
12.6
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
48.9
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.13
U
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
1.0
B
F
7440-22-4
Silver
3.0
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture: HOMOGE
Artifacts: ____
CLIENT SAMPLE ID: RH10SG-TOTAL
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
TAT SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
SDG No.: 3 0026
Lab Sample ID: 30032
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water) -. SOIL_
Level (low/med): LOW
% Solids: 100.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After:
Comments:
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
22.1
P
7440-39-3
Barium
153
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
3.9
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
13 .6
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
2380
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.19
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.61
B
W
F
7440-22-4
Silver
2.7
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
Texture:
Artifacts
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
±3
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
1
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Contract:
TAT SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: ECOLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
SDG No.: 30552
Lab Sample ID: 3 0558
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/med): LOW
'% Solids: _85.3
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After: Y_
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Ant imony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
22.7
P
7440-39-3
Barium
199
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
2.6
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
16.0
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
2580
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury-
0.18
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
1.1
B
F
7440-22-4
Silver
4.9
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture: HOMOGE
Artifacts:
CLIENT SAMPLE ID: RHIOSP-TOTAL
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
-------
TAT
CHICAGO
TAT SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
SDG No.: 30026
Lab Sample ID: 30034
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/med): LOW
» % Solids: 100.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After:
Comments:
CAS No.
Analyte
Concent rat i on
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
22.1
P
7440-39-3
Barium
156
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
4.0
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
13 .7
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
2420
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.21
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.89
B
S
F
7440-22-4
Silver
2.7
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
Texture:
Artifacts:
FORM I
IN
ILM03.0
16
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
TAT SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
SDG No.: 30552
Lab Sample ID: 3 0560
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/med): LOW
'% Solids: _76.9
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After: Y_
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CAS NO.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
27.7
P
7440-39-3
Barium
214
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
2.5
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
17.6
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
2670
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.33
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
1.1
B
F
7440-22-4
Silver
5.4
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture: HOMOGE
Artifacts:
CLIENT SAMPLE ID: RH10ASP-TOTAL
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: SCOLCGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
TAT SAMPLE NO.
SDG No.: 30026
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/mea): LOW
* % Solids: 100.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight
Lab Sample ID: 30035
Date Received: 07/22/95
MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After:
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
10.3
P
7440-39-3
Barium
166
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
2.8
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
10.2
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
1090
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.10
U
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.61
B
F
7440-22-4
Silver
1.8
B
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture:
Artifacts:
FORM I - IN ILM03.0
17
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Contract
TAT SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: ECOLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
SDG No.: 30552
Lab Sample ID: 3 0561
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/med): LOW
' % Solids: _82.5
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before: _
Color After: Y
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CLIENT SAMPLE ID: RH10SB-TOTAL
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
15.7
P
7440-39-3
Barium
247
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
1.5
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
17.3
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
1350
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.12
U
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.73
U
W
F
7440-22-4
Silver
4.9
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture: HOMOGE
Artifacts:
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
TAT SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANEE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
SDG No.: 30026
Lab Sample ID: 3 0036
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/med): LOW
% Solids: 100.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After:
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Ant imony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
6.6
P
7440-39-3
Barium
165
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
1.2
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
8.5
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
59.8
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.10
U
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.40
U
F
7440-22-4
Silver
1.7
U
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture:
Artifacts:
FORM I - IN ILM03.0
21
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
1 TAT SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT Contract:
RH11SG
Lab Code: EANDE_ Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.: SDG No.: 30552_
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_ Lab Sample ID: 30562
Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/22/95
• % Solids: _70.9
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Ant imony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
17.1
P
7440-39-3
Barium
556
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
0.79
U
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
16.5
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
125
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.14
U
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
1.4
F
7440-22-4
Silver
5.4
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Color Before: 'Clarity Before: Texture: HOMOGE
Color After: Y Clarity After: C Artifacts:
Comments:
CLIENT SAMPLE ID: RH11SG-TOTAL
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Cede: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
TAT SAMPLE NO.
SDG No.: 30026
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_ Lab Sample ID: 30037
Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/22/95
% Solids: 100.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After:
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CAS NO.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Ant imony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
6.6
P
7440-39-3
Barium
129
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
1.2
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
8.7
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
83 . 9
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.10
U
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.40
U
F
7440-22-4
Silver
1.7
U
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture:
Artifacts
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
20
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
TAT SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
SDG No.: 3 0552
Lab Sample ID: 3 0563
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/med): LOW
% Solids: _83.2
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After: Y_
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C
CAS No.
Analyte
Concent rat i on
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Ant imony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
8 . 7
P
7440-39-3
Barium
214
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
0.67
U
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
16.3
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
125
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.16
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.81
B
S
F
7440-22-4
Silver
4.0
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture: HOMOGE
Artifacts:
CLIENT SAMPLE ID: RH11SB-TOTAL
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
-------
TAT
CHICAGO
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Contract:
TAT SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: ECOLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
SDG NO.: 30026
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_ Lab Sample ID: 3 0038
Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/22/95
% Solids: 100.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After:
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Ant imony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
3.6
P
7440-39-3
Barium
105
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
1.3
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
6.6
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
189
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.10
U
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.40
U
F
7440-22-4
Silver
1.7
U
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture:
Artifacts
FORM I - IN ILM03.0
Z2
-------
TAT
CHICAGO
TAT SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLCGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANEE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
SDG NO.: 30552
Lab Sample ID: 30564
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/med): LOW
* % Solids: _86.3
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After: Y_
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CAS No.
Analyte
Concent rat i on
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Ant imony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
7.0
P
7440-39-3
Barium
144
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
0 .65
U
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
11.0
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
261
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.12
U
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
1.5
F
7440-22-4
Silver
3.2
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture: HOMOGE
Artifacts:
CLIENT SAMPLE ID: RH12SG-TOTAL
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
EPA SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Contract:
Lab Name: ECOLCGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS NO.:
BES1SG
SDG No.: 30006
Lab Sample ID: 30012
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/med): LOW
» % Solids: 100.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
4.0
P
7440-39-3
Barium
165
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
0 . 56
U
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
12.7
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
\
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
52.7
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.10
U
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.60
U
N
F
7440-22-4
Silver
1.7
U
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Color Before: "Clarity Before: Texture:
Color After: Y Clarity After: C Artifacts:
Comments:
FORM I - IN ILM03.0
1±
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
1
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Contract:
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: ECOLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
SDG No.: 3 0533
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_ Lab Sample ID: 30539
Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/22/95
'% Solids: _84 . 8
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After: Y_
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
4.5
P
7440-39-3
Barium
173
~
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
0.66
U
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
11.6
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
61.7
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.12
u
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.47
u
W
F
7440-22-4
Silver
2.0
u
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture: H_
Artifacts:
CLIENT SAMPLE ID: BES1SG-TOTAL
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
EPA SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
SDG No.: 30006
Lab Sample ID: 30010
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/med): LOW
* % Solids: 100.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After:
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
6.3
P
7440-39-3
Barium
160
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
0 .66
B
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
11.1
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
160
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
o
H
O
U
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.60
U
N
F
7440-22-4
Silver
1.7
U
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture:
Artifacts:
FORM I
IN
ILM03.0
I'd
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
EPA SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLGGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.-:
SDG No.: 30533
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_ Lab Sample ID: 30537
Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/22/95
% Solids: _85.1
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After:
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Ant imony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
9.2
P
7440-39-3
Barium
209
*
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
0.66
U
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
12 .1
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
166
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.12
u
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.69
B
F
7440-22-4
Silver
2.0
U
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture: H_
Artifacts:
CLIENT SAMPLE ID: BES1SP-TOTAL
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
EPA SAMPLE NO.
SDG No.: 30006
Lab Sample ID: 3 0011
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/med): LOW
* % Solids: 100 . 0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After:
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C
CAS No.
Analyte
Concent rat i on
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
4 .6
P
7440-39-3
Barium
109
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
1.1
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
8.2
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
123
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.10
U
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.60
U
WN
F
7440-22-4
Silver
1.7
U
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture:
Artifacts:
FORM I
IN
ILM03.0
10
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECCLGGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
EPA SAMPLE NO.
SDG No.: 30533
Lab Sample ID: 3 053 8
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/med): LOW
* % Solids: _85.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight) -. MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After:
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Ant imony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
5 . 9
P
7440-39-3
Barium
133
*
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
0.66
U
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
10 .2
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
175
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.12
U
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
1.1
B
F
7440-22-4
Silver
2.0
U
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture: H_
Artifacts:
CLIENT SAMPLE ID: BES1SB-TOTAL
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Cede: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
TAT SAMPLE NO.
BESID
SDG No.: 30046
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_ Lab Sample ID: 30052
Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/22/95
% Solids: 100.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After:
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Ant imony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
5. 7
U
P
7440-39-3
Barium
171
B
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
00
in
CM
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
40.7
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
164
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
4.3
N*
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
3.2
B
WN
F
7440-22-4
Silver
10 .4
U
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture:
Artifacts:
FORM I - IN
ILM03 . 0
-------
TAT
CHICAGO
EPA SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECCLOGY_AND_ENVIRCNMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
SDG NO.: 30006
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_ Lab Sample ID: 30014
Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/22/95
I
% Solids: 100.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After:
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Ant imony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
7 . o
P
7440-39-3
Barium
161
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
1.6
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
12.3
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
443
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0 .20
U
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.60
U
WN
F
7440-22-4
Silver
1.7
U
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture:
Artifacts:
FORM I
IN
ILM03.0
14
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
EPA SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLCGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANLE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
SDG No.: 30533
Lab Sample ID: 30541
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level flow/med): LOW
* % Solids: _81-1
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After: Y_
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
6.4
P
7440-39-3
Barium
177
¦k
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
0.69
u
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
10.2
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
402
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.12
u
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.93
B
F
7440-22-4
Silver
2.0
U
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture: H_
Artifacts:
CLIENT SAMPLE ID: BPSG-TOTAL
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECCLCGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No..:
EPA SAMPLE NO.
SDG NO.: 30006
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_ Lab Sample ID: 30013
Level (low/med) : LOW Date Received: 07/22/95
% Solids: 100.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After:
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Ant imony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
9.4
P
7440-39-3
Barium
141
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
1.4
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
7.4
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
834
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.10
U
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0 .60
U
WN
F
7440-22-4
Silver
1.7
U
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture:
Artifacts;
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
is
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
1
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Conerace:
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: E CO LOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT _
Lab Code: HANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
SDG No.: 30533
Lab Sample ID: 3 0540
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/med): LOW
1 % Solids: _84.9
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After: Y_
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Ant imony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
5.3
P
7440-39-3
Barium
218
*
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
1.9
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
8.3
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
1200
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.12
U
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
1.3
F
7440-22-4
Silver
2.0
U
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture: H_
Artifacts:
CLIENT SAMPLE ID: BPSP-TOTAL
FORM I - IN
ILM03 .0
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Contract:
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: . ECOLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT
Lab code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
SDG No.: 30006
Lab Sample ID: 30015
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/med): LOW
' % Solids: 100.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After:
Comment s:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
19.6
P
7440-39-3
Barium
178
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
2.4
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
17.9
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
1490
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.10
u
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.60
u
WN
F
7440-22-4
Silver
2.6
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture:
Artifacts:
FORM I - IN ILM03.0
id
-------
TAT
CHICAGO
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.-:
EPA SAMPLE NO.
BPSB
SDG No.: 3 0533
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_ Lab Sample ID: 30642
Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/22/95
% Solids: _84.2
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Ant imony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
18.7
P
7440-39-3
Barium
180
*
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
2.2
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
13 .4
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
1800
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.12
U
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
1.0
B
F
7440-22-4
Silver
3.4
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Color Before: Clarity Before: Texture: H
Color After: Y Clarity After: C Artifacts: _
Comments:
CLIENT SAMPLE ID: BPSB-TOTAL
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
-------
TAT
:hicago
TAT SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECCLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANEE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
SDG No.: 30026
Lab Sample ID: 30043
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/med): LOW
» % Solids: 100.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After:
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C
CAS No.
Analyte
Concent rat i on
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Ant imony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
2.4
P
7440-39-3
Barium
87.0
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
0.96
B
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
4.2
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
132
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.10
U
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.61
B
F
7440-22-4
Silver
1.7
U
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture:
Artifacts:
FORM I
IN
ILM03.0
11
-------
TAT
CHICAGO
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
TAT SAMPLE NO.
SDG No.: 30552
Lab Sample ID: 3 056 9
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/med): LOW
»% Solids: _81.2
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After:
Comments:
'Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
6.2
P
7440-39-3
Barium
167
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
0.69
U
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
9.0
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
246
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.12
U
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.74
U
F
7440-22-4
Silver
3.0
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture: HOMOGE
Artifacts:
CLIENT SAMPLE ID: BCDC1SG-TOTAL
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
TAT SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
SDG NO.: 30026
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_ Lab Sample ID: 30042
Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/22/95
% Solids: 100.0
Concentration. Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After: Y_
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CAS NO.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
3.8
P
7440-39-3
Barium
132
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
0 . 56
u
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
6.3
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
12.1
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.10
u
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0 .40
u
F
7440-22-4
Silver
1.7
u
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture:
Artifacts;
FORM I - IN ILM03.0
12
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
TAT SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
BCDC1SP
SDG No.
30552
Lab Sample ID: 3 0568
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/med): LOW
% Solids: _90.1
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After:
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
8.8
P
7440-39-3
Barium
262
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
TAT SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.-:
SDG No.: 30026
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_ Lab Sample ID: 30041
Level (iow/med): LOW Date Received: 07/22/95
% Solids: 100.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After:
Comments •.
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
3.1
P
7440-39-3
Barium
127
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
0.56
u
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
6.2
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
63 .2
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.10
u
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.40
u
F
7440-22-4
Silver
1.7
u
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
Texture:
Artifacts
FORM I
IN
ILM03.0
10
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
TAT SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
SDG NO.: 30552
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_ Lab Sample ID: 30567
Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/22/95
% Solids: _85.4
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before:
Color After:
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Ant imony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
11. 9
P
7440-39-3
Barium
254
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
0.66
U
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
13 .4
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
106
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.12
U
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.70
U
F
7440-22-4
Silver
4.5
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture: HOMOGE
Artifacts:
CLIENT SAMPLE ID: BCDC1SB-TOTAL
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
1
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Contract:
TAT SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: E COLGGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT _
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No..:
SDG No.: 30026
Lab Sample ID: 30039
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/med): LOW
% Solids: 100.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
128
P
7440-39-3
Barium
408
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
13 .0
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
27.1
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
10200
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.24
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.40
U
S
F
7440-22-4
Silver
7.8
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Color Before:
Color After:
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
Texture:
Artifacts:
FORM I
IN
ILM03.0
13
-------
TAT
ZHICAGO
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name:,ECOLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract: ¦
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
TAT SAMPLE NO.
SDG No.: 30552
Lab Sample ID: 30565
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/med): LOW
* % Solids: _88.4
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
Color Before: _
Color After: Y
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
CLIENT SAMPLE ID: BCDC2SB-TOTAL
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Antimony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
121
P
7440-39-3
Barium
381
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
7.6
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
27.8
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
9160
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.17
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.68
U
W
F
7440-22-4
Silver
12.8
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Texture: HOMOGE
Artifacts:
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
TAT SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: E COLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS NO.:
SDG No.
3Q026
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_ Lab Sample ID: 30040
Level (low/med): LOW Date Received: 07/22/95
% Solids: 100.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight): MG/KG
CAS No.
Analyte
Concentration
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Ant imony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
128
P
7440-39-3
Barium
401
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
12.5
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
27.7
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
10100
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.27
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.87
B
S
F
7440-22-4
Silver
7.6
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Zolor Before:
Color After:
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
Texture:
Artifacts
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
14
-------
TAT - CHICAGO
TAT SAMPLE NO.
INORGANIC ANALYSES DATA SHEET
Lab Name: ECOLOGY_AND_ENVIRONMENT Contract:
Lab Code: EANDE Case No.: 9501.648 SAS No.:
SDG No.: 30552
Lab Sample ID: 3 0566
Date Received: 07/22/95
Matrix (soil/water): SOIL_
Level (low/med): LOW
* % Solids: _88.0
Concentration Units (ug/L or mg/kg dry weight) : MG/KG
CAS No.
Analyte
Concent rat ion
C
Q
M
7429-90-5
Aluminum
NR
7440-36-0
Ant imony
NR
7440-38-2
Arsenic
131
P
7440-39-3
Barium
339
P
7440-41-7
Beryllium
NR
7440-43-9
Cadmium
9.5
P
7440-70-2
Calcium
NR
7440-47-3
Chromium
31.1
P
7440-48-4
Cobalt
NR
7440-50-8
Copper
NR
7439-89-6
Iron
NR
7439-92-1
Lead
9250
P
7439-95-4
Magnesium
NR
7439-96-5
Manganese
NR
7439-97-6
Mercury
0.17
N
CV
7440-02-0
Nickel
NR
7440-09-7
Potassium
NR
7782-49-2
Selenium
0.68
U
F
7440-22-4
Silver
14.8
P
7440-23-5
Sodium
NR
7440-28-0
Thallium
NR
7440-62-2
Vanadium
NR
7440-66-6
Zinc
NR
Cyanide
NR
Color Before:
Color After: Y_
Comments:
Clarity Before:
Clarity After: C_
Texture: HOMOGE
Artifacts:
CLIENT SAMPLE ID: BCDC3SB-TOTAL
FORM I - IN
ILM03.0
-------
APPENDIX D
LETTER FROM DIRECTOR OF ANALYTICAL SERVICES CENTER
D-l
-------
October 5, 199S
Ma. Pat Van LMuwen
OSBPA ftegion 5
77 Weat Jackson Blvd.
BSK-6J
Chicago. IL 60604
Dear Ms. Van Leeuwen:
In ths bid for analytical work at the Circle Smelting Site, the
request to sieve dust to 2S0 microns was made. The laboratory was
unclear regarding the specifics of this request. Previous
solicitations of this sort received at the laboratory specified meeh
size.
The laboratory contacted David Hendren of our Chicago office through
whom the solicitation was made. He was unable to provide any
additional information and instructed the laboratory to sieve the
saaplea through a nesh size which the laboratory felt was appropriate
and to document the actions taken in the final report.
If you have any question* or require additional information, please
contact me at (716) 605-8080.
Sincerely,
Oary Kahn
Director - Analytical Services center
-------
APPENDIX E
ADDITIONAL TESTING RESULTS
E-l
-------
Ecology and
Analytical
Environment, Inc.
Services Center
JOB NUMBER :9501.648
ELAP ID : 10486
CLIENT
TEST NAME
PARAMETER
: TAT
: TOTAL
: TOTAL
- CHICAGO
WEIGHT
WEIGHT
UNITS
: G
SAMPLE ID
RESULTS Q QNT.
LIMIT
EE-95-30044
W119 RH1D
5.01
NA
EE-95-30045
W119 RH2D
5 .28
NA
EE-95 - 30046
W119 RH3D
3 .29
NA
EE-95-30047
W119 RH5D
5 .22
NA
EE-95-30048
W119 RH6D
3.76
NA
EE-95-30049
W119 RH7D
6.95
NA
EE-95-30050
W119 RHSD
4.55
NA
EE-95-30051
W119 RH9D
3 .03
NA
EE-95-30052
W119 BESID
2.47
NA
QUALIFIERS: C * COMMENT ND = NOT DETECTED
J --ESTIMATED VALUE
NA - NOT APPLICABLE
-------
JOB NUMBER : 9501. 648
ELAP ID : 10486
Ecology and Environment, Inc.
Analytical Services Center
CLIENT : TAT - CHICAGO
TEST NAME : % THROUGH 100 MESH UNITS : %
PARAMETER : % THROUGH 100 MESH
SAMPLE ID RESULTS Q QNT. LIMIT
EE-95-30042
W119 BCDC1SP 14.0 NA
EE-95-30043
W119 BCDC1SG
31.9
NA
EE-95-30044
W119 RH1D
5.2
NA
EE-95-30045
W119 RH2D
10.2
NA
EE-95-30046
W119 RH3D
4.6
NA
EE-95-30047
W119 RH5D
0.0
NA
EE-95-30048
W119 RH6D
5.1
NA
EE-95-30049
W119 RH7D
1.2
NA
EE-95-30050
W119 RH8D
11.2
NA
EE-95-30051
W119 RH9D
0.7
NA
EE-95-30052
W119 BESID
4.9
NA
QUALIFIERS: C - COMMENT
J » ESTIMATED VALUE
NA - NOT APPLICABLE
ND - NOT DETECTED
-------
JOB NUMBER : 9501.648
ELAP ID : 10486
Ecology and Environment, Inc.
Analytical Services Center
CLIENT : TAT - CHICAGO
TEST NAME : % THROUGH 100 MESH UNITS : %
PARAMETER : % THROUGH 100 MESH
SAMPLE ID
RESULTS
Q
QNT. LIMIT
EE-95-30030
W119 RH9SB
17.9
NA
EE-95-30031
W119 RH9SG
14. 5
NA
EE-95-30032
W119 RH10SP
38.0
NA
EE-95- 3 003 3
W119 RH10SG
14 .4
NA
EE-95-30034
W119 RH10ASP
30.8
NA
EE-95-30035
W119 RH10SB
20.9
NA
EE-95-30036
W119 RH11SG
4.8
NA
EE-95-30037
W119 RH11SB
13.2
NA
EE-95-30038
W119 RH12SG
25.4
NA
EE-95-30039
W119 BCDC2SB
24 .4
NA
EE-95-30040
W119 BCDC3SB
20.6
NA
EE-95-30041
W119 BCDC1SB
18. 5
NA
QUALIFIERS: C = COMMENT ND - NOT DETECTED
J « ESTIMATED VALUE
NA =» NOT APPLICABLE
-------
JOB NUMBER : 9501.648
ELAP ID : 10486
Ecology and Environment, Inc.
Analytical Services Center
CLIENT : TAT - CHICAGO
TEST NAME : % THROUGH 100 MESH UNITS : %
PARAMETER : % THROUGH 100 MESH
SAMPLE ID RESULTS Q QNT. LIMIT
EE-95-30006
W119 RH1SB 25.8 NA
EE-95-30007
W119 RH1SG 9.6 NA
EE-95-30008
W119 RH2SG
28 .6
NA
EE-95-30009
W119 RH2SB
30.4
NA
EE-95-30010
W119 BESISP
7.2
NA
EE-95-30011
W119 BESISB
26.7
NA
EE-95-30012
W119 BESISG
9.9
NA
EE-95 - 3 0013
W119 BPSP
29.6
NA
EE-95-30014
W119 BPSG
10.6
NA
EE-95-30015
W119 BPSB
14 .3
NA
EE-95-30016
W119 RH3SB
4.9
NA
EE-95-30017
W119 RH3SG
15. 0
NA
QUALIFIERS: C = COMMENT ND - NOT DETECTED
J » ESTIMATED VALUE
NA - NOT APPLICABLE
-------
JOB NUMBER : 9501.648
ELAP ID : 10486
Ecology and Environment, Inc.
Analytical Services Center
CLIENT : TAT - CHICAGO
TEST NAME : % THROUGH 100 MESH UNITS : %
PARAMETER : % THROUGH 100 MESH
SAMPLE ID RESULTS Q QNT. LIMIT
EE-95-30018
W119 RH4SB 11.1 NA
EE-95-30019
W119 RH5SG
23 .3
NA
EE-95-30020
W119 RH5SB
30.8
NA
EE-95-30021
W119 RH6SB
12 .5
NA
EE-95-30022
W119 RH6ASB
16.4
NA
EE-95-30023
W119 RH6SG
40.1
NA
EE-95-30024
W119 RH7SB
25.6
NA
EE-95-30025
W119 RH7ASB
27.1
NA
EE-95-30026
W119 RH7SP
31.5
NA
EE-95 - 3 002 7
W119 RH7SG
24.2
NA
EE-95 - 30028
W119 RH8SG
25.2
NA
EE-95-30029
W119 RH8SB
24.4
NA
QUALIFIERS: C =» COMMENT
J - ESTIMATED VALUE
NA - NOT APPLICABLE
ND » NOT DETECTED
-------
appendix
SAMPLING PROTOCOLS
CIRCLE SMELTING CORPORATION SITE
Preparation for the environment sample collection begins at the field unit. The
environmental team will be given an assignment for the morning or the entire day.
Once the assignment is received, the environmental team members will check the
accuracy and completeness of the data on each environmental sample form. The
dwelling ID number and other identifying information should be on all the
environmental forms.
All members of the team should wear appropriate identification.
Exterior and interior samples will be collected. Exterior samples to be collected are
soil samples. The interior samples and information to be collected is as follows:
1) Collection of tap water samples.
2) Sketching a floor plan of the residence.
3) Collection of interior surface dust samples.
4) Screening for lead in painted surfaces; walls and trim,
avoiding metal doors outlets, etc.
Detection limits will permit evaluation of field sample data against the following
limits, so as to determine whether the samples are above background levels with a
95 % confidence level.
Sample Medium
Action level for Lead
House Dust
Paint
Play Area Soil
Drinking Water
500 /jg/g
0.7 mg/cm2
500 jug/g
15 /ug/L
Note the detection limits of one-tenth the action levels noted may not be achieved
if the minimum sample amounts discussed in the Sampling Protocols section are
not collected.
II. Sampling Protocols
A. Environmental Sampling Design Considerations
1. Selection of Residences to be Sampled:
-------
a. Region V will collect environmental samples: soil, house dust, drinking
water and paint, from all households where visual indication (i.e.
green moss, bare soil spots) of possible affected areas are identified.
The names, address, and telephone numbers of residents will be
provided by U.S EPA.
b. Residential environmental sampling will be conducted as
summarized in the table below:
Sampling Area Total Households No. of Sampled
Households
Beckemeyer Village 20 100% of homes
Circle Smelter 10 100% samples
B. Pre-Sampling Verification Interview and Briefing
Prior to sampling, the U.S. EPA will contact the households to obtain access
agreements for environmental sampling. U.S. EPA will the forward the names,
addresses, and telephone numbers of households to be sampled to E & E.
If for some reason a household cannot be sampled (e.g. no one is home), an
attempt to re-schedule sampling will be made.
C. Sample Collection, Documentation, and Handling
1. Sampling Number System: All samples will be assigned an unique
identification number according to Region V CLP protocol. All analyses shall be
performed "blind" by the CLP laboratory staff; correlation or analytical data with
site location information shall be performed after the analytical results are
completed.
2. Sample Containers: Sample containers and associated supplies will be
obtained by E & E and prepared and utilized per Region V SARA Sampling Handling
Manual or E & E SOPs, with the exception that one liter poly bottles will be used
for the collection of water samples.
3. Equipment Calibration: The environmental team will calibrate the Paint
XRF instruments (Princeton Gamma-Tech XK-2 or XK-3). Either the Princeton
Gamma-Tech XK-2 or the XKt3, or both, will be used. Both instruments operate in
the same principle.The newer model, the XK-3 is capable of reading only to a
maximum of 10 mg Pb/cm2. Paint in the older housing may have higher
concentrations of lead, thus, when monitoring teams visit older housing, i.e.,
those built before 1940, the XK-2 should be used, if available. Of the XK-2 is not
-------
available, an attempt should be made to extrapolate values greater that 10 mg
Pb/cm2 with the XK-3.
After the necessary calibration of equipment, the environmental monitoring team
should make certain that all equipment and supplies are ready to use.
4. Field Sample Documentation:
a. Field Sheets: Field sheets per SARA Sampling Handling Manual or
E&E SOPs shall be used to document locations and times of sampling,
as well as all other appropriate details. In particular, sketches should
be made of the locations sampled, especially dust and soil samples
taken in the play areas, as noted above. E&E shall retain field sheets
until instructed otherwise by U.S. EPA.
b. Sample Chain of Custody: Sample chain-of-custody forms will be
prepared per E&E SOPs.
5. Sample Collection Procedures:
NOTE: One field duplicated sample will be collected for every ten field samples of
drinking water, soil and house dust.
a. Soil Sample Collection: The primary method of determining the lead
content of the soil will be by acid digestion and graphite furnace atomic
absorption spectrometry.
1. Site Description: For each location, a detailed drawing should be
made that shows the boundary of the lot, the position of the main
building and any others buildings such as storage sheds or garages,
the position of the sidewalks, driveways and other paved areas, the
position of the play areas if obvious, and the position of the areas
with exposed soil (grassy or bare), roof rain spouts and general
drainage patterns.
In addition to the diagram, briefly describe the location, including the
following information:
• Type of building construction (i.e., brick, wood, 1 or 2 story)
• Condition of main building
• Condition of property (i.e., debris, standing water vegetation cover)
• Presence and type of fence
-------
• Animals on property
• Apparent use of the yard (i.e., toys, sandbox, children present)
• Location of soil aliquot
2. Sample Collection: Three soil samples per household should be
collected. These soil samples should be composite samples. The first sample will
be collected in playground areas (or dog house area), the second sample will be
collected in bare areas (or where tailing can be identified), and the third sample
will be collected in green areas (where no tailing present). All samples should be
composite samples. Each sample comprising four sub-samples (aliquots) collected
by choosing a center and collect a sub-sample at two feet from the center in a
cardinal pattern. All aliquots will be of equal volume and will be mixed in a
stainless steel bowl prior to packaging. Assemble composite soil core segments in
8 ounce glass jars suitable for prevention of contamination and loss of the sample
at ambient temperature until submitted to the laboratory for analysis. Clean the
corer after collecting each sample composite by reinsertion of the corer into the
soil of the next sampling area.
3. Sample Handling and Storage: Seal the sample jars to prevent loss or
contamination of the sample and store samples in a dry location at ambient
temperature.
a. Record-keeping and sampling custody: Initiate soil sample
records for each location. Record sample numbers on location
diagram, soil area description, and sample record sheet. Send the
sample to the laboratory and release the sample to the laboratory
personnel for analysis.
b. Surface Dust Collection:
1. Collection Apparatus for Vacuum Method:
The equipment used to collect surface dust was personal air
monitoring pump, an air monitoring cassette containing a 37mm diameter
0.8 micron polycellulose acetate filter, and collection attachment.
Vacuum equipment to be used will be equipped with a pre-weighed glass
fiber filter (the weight of each filter will be noted in indelible ink on its zip-
lock by the laboratory prior to shipment to the field) to trap the dust. The
filter will be removed between residences and placed in zip-lock bag for
laboratory analysis. Alternatively, a modified portable "dustbuster" type
vacuum cleaner may be used (Sirchee-Splittler method, however the
Sirchee-Splittler modified "dustbuster" will not be used), with the dust
removed after sampling each residence and placed in a zip-lock bag. Other
necessary sampling equipment are zip-lock baggies containing pre-weighed filters
-------
with the weight noted on the bag in indelible ink, and a cylinder of compressed
air to decontaminate sampling equipment.
A sample of dust was collected over a measured area, or composite of
measured areas so that three measures were obtained:
Dust Loading = mg dust/m2
Lead Loading = fjg lead/m2
Lead Concentration = jjg lead/g dust or ppm lead
2. Sample Areas;
The interior surface dust sample will consist of a composite of sub-samples
taken from the following areas in the residence:
Entry (E): A floor area inside the residence directly
adjacent to the main entry to the residence.
Floor (F): At least two floor areas which should be include but are
not limited to a sample from a high-traffic area in the main living area
and a sample from the child's bedroom or guest bedroom. If carpet is
present in the residence it shall be the first choice of sample area. If
a carpet is not present, a mixture of non-carpet floor areas will be
sampled.
Window (W): At least three window areas (window sills
and window wells), including but not limited to a window in the main
living areas and a window in the child's bedroom or guest's bedroom.
The main entry sample is collected from the floor close to the entry door.
The entry most used by the famMy should be used. The identification of
sample sites from the most frequently occupied room and the child's
bedroom will be determined partly by the floor covering present in those
rooms. If the floor is carpeted, a larger sample can readily be collected from
almost any pathway in the room. A pathway might consist of an area
immediately inside of a doorway into the room to the other. In a room
where there is no carpeting, the most likely place to find an adequate supply
of surface dust would be an area immediately adjacent to a wall. For each
floor surface, an approximately one meter square area should be vacuumed.
Additional living areas (e.g. additional floor areas, around furniture, etc.)
should be vacuumed, if necessary, to obtain an adequate sample size. In no
event shall dust be obtained from household areas where dust generally
collects from long periods of time, such as behind major appliances, under
beds, etc.
The sample sequence should be as follows: collect the bedroom, kitchen
-------
and living room samples first. Then, collect the floor sample from the entry
way. Then, collect the window well samples. Finally, if necessary, collect
the samples from additional living areas.
Once the individual sampling areas are determined, they should be noted on
the sampling sheets, including the total area sampled for the household.
One composite sample of dust will be taken and analyzed per household.
Each sample should be sieved by passing the sample through a 250/c/m sieve
prior to send it to the lab for analysis.
In order to more fully describe where samples have been collected, a top
view of the residence will be made by the sampling crew. This sketch
should show the primary features of the residence, including a north arrow
indicator and the relationship of the various rooms to each other. The
sampling areas should also be indicated. Rooms should be labeled
according to their apparent function.
c. Drinking water sample collection: Two drinking water samples should
be taken at each residence. The first sample will be first-draw, as specified
in the U.S. EPA's Final Rule for Lead and Copper in Drinking Water, Federal
Register, June 7, 1991 and the second will be a flushed sample.
1. Sampling nollention:
Residents will be provided with clean, capped bottles and instructed to
collect water on the day of scheduled environmental sampling. The
sampling team or its manager should give the following instructions to the
resident who will collect the samples:
• Both samples should be taken from the cold water faucet
of the kitchen.
• The first sample should be a first draw sample of water that has been
standing in the pipes from 6 to 18 hours. There are two options for
the time this sample is taken: (1) it can be taken first thing in the
morning, or (2) if all of the residents if the household have been out
of the house for the entire day, it can be taken at the end of the day
(i.e. dinner time). This sample should be labeled first-draw water.
• The second sample should be taken after letting the water run for 30
minutes. This sample should be labeled flushed water.
• The plastic bottles should be completely filled with water.
• The sampling team will pick up the samples at a convenient time on
the day of scheduled environmental sampling.
-------
• Before dropping off the water collection bottles, the appropriate
member of the sampling team will fill out and affix the label provided.
The chain of custody form will be initiated when the collectors pick
up each water sample. E&E will record pH and conductivity prior to
acidifying the samples.
• At the end of each collection day, water samples will be acidified with
nitric acid, per required protocol. After the addition of the nitric acid
to the water sample, the initials of the person adding the acid to the
sample and the time and date will be recorded. In no event will the
nitric acid preservative be provided to the residents. Nitric acid (1:1)
will be added to reach pH<2.
2. Water System Evaluation:
An evaluation will be made of the plumbing under the kitchen sink in order
to determine the composition of water lines servicing the kitchen sink. The
water supply beneath the kitchen sink generally consists of hot and cold
water pipes coming from either the wall behind the sink or, occasionally, up
through the floor into the cabinet beneath the sink. These supply lines
generally terminate at shut-off valves are generally of different material that
the supply lines going to the shut-off valves.
Supply lines in residential construction can be copper, galvanized, PVC, or
lead pipe. PVC pipe is easily identified because of its plastic composition.
Copper pipe can be identified by scraping the surface corrosion from the
pipe to reveal the bright copper color. Galvanized pipe can be recognized by
the threaded fittings if present and visible or by the hard surface of the pipe.
Lead pipe can be recognized by the softness of the material. It is easily
bent into shape and can be scratched with a knife blade or other hard tool.
When scratched, the exposed surface is silvery in color.
The supply lines running from the shut-off valves to the sink generally are
copper, chrome-plated brass or PVC. The PVC is easily recognized because
of its plastic composition. Chrome-plated brass is also easily recognized
because of the shiny surface. Copper can be identified by scratching the
surface to reveal the copper color. Identifying the composition of the
plumbing system beneath the sink completes the evaluation of the plumbing
system, All information should be recorded.
d. Paint Sampling Protocol and Using an XRF Analyzer: Indoor and
outdoor paint shall be analyzed in-situ by a portable X-Ray Fluorescence
(XRF) instrument, operated per manufacturer's instructions. Measurements
will typically be made in play areas below three feet in elevation from the
floor, indoor walls, door frames, window sills, and banisters, with special
attention given to areas indicating peeling or chipped paint, or evidence of
-------
chewing on the surface by the resident children. A minimum of five
locations will be measured and recorded on the field sheets. The condition of
each painted surface sample will be noted on the field sheets. The condition of
each painted surface sample will be noted on the field sheets by the instrument
operator. The mean of the several individual readings will be reported as the
paint lead value for the residence. Additional information is provided below.
1. Background and Selection of Surfaces: The concentration of lead in
paint will be determined by using an X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) analyzer.
Two types of instruments may be used, the XK-2 or the XK-3, both
manufactured by Princeton Gamma-Tech, Inc. The XK-3 with a range of 0-
10 mg of lead (Pb) per square centimeter (cm2) will be the primary
instrument used. If available the XK-2 will be a back-up and also used in the
event a reading on the XK-3 exceeds 10 mg Pd/cm2.
In each residence two surfaces, a painted woodwork and a painted walls in
each of three rooms or areas most frequently occupied by the subject child
will be evaluated (e.g. child's bedroom, portch, living room). One reading
will be taken at three different locations on each type of surface. The
identify of the rooms and the Pb found in the paint will be recorded. In
addition, a copy of a floor plan of the residence will be available to the
technician and on which the sample location will be noted. All unpainted
surfaces, such as paneling, wallpaper, and unpainted woodwork will not be
tested. In the event a room selected is unpainted an alternate room will be
selected and this information recorded.
In order to characterize the paint and surfaces in a given room at least one
painted wall and one painted trim in the room (door or window sill) should
be screened. When screening the woodwork, three separate readings will
be taken at three different locations on the woodwork. A similar procedure
will be used for screening painted walls within a room. If all walls are
painted the same color, then the three readings can be taken from one
wall. If the walls are painted different colors, then a reading from the
different colored walls should be included. Whenever changing areas or
locations, one reading should be taken to clear the machine prior to taking
the actual reading to be recorded. The arithmetic mean of the eighteen
readings should be recorded as the reading for the house. Each individual
reading will also be recorded to provide data for future follow-up actions, if
necessary.
XRF reading will be taken by placing the instrument on the designated
surface and opening the shutter (more accurate readings can be obtained
from flat surfaces so curved surfaces will be avoided). Once the shutter is
opened the lead content of the paint will appear as a visual numerical
display on the instrument. The operator will read the number for the other
-------
team member to record. This will be repeated back to the operator.
In addition to the paint lead screening, the environmental monitors will make
an evaluation of the condition of painted surfaces. This evaluation will be a
rating scale of 1 to 3:
1) Intact
2) Slight to Moderate Peeling
3) Moderate to Extreme Peeling
2. Operating of the XRF Analy7er to Determine the Concentration of
Lead: At the start of each day the performance of the XRF
instruments are evaluated using standard procedures. Prior to taking
readings at the residence, calibration checks will occur using
reference material (1.5 mg/cm2 Pb and a Zero Check) prepared by the
Department of Housing and Urban Development. After the
designated areas in the home have been sampled and before the team
is ready to leave, the instrument's calibration information will once
again be checked. All calibration information should be added to the
FORM 07 XRF Lead Paint Screening work sheet, if available, or
equivalent form. The HUD Guidelines for Lead in Paint, September
19, 1990 (Revision 3) are followed.
Following is the Operating Procedure for the XK-3 unit:
a) Remove the battery pack, coiled cable, and XK-3 unit from the
carrying case.
b) Connect the battery pack to the XK-3 unit, using the coiled
cable.
c) Locate the LOCK SWITCH underneath the handle toward the
rear of the unit and push it forward. A red light over the
display window will now glow to indicate that the instrument is
ready to perform its analysis as soon as the shutter is opened.
d) Depress the RED RESET button on the back plate of the unit,
just above the coiled cable connection, and hold for 8-10.
e) Grasping the wooden handle, position the face-plate of the
instrument against the surface to be measured and push down
firmly and evenly on the handle to spring the shutter open.
The red light over the window will now blink to indicate that
the shutter is open and that the measurement is taking place.
As soon as the shutter opens, the previous read-out in the
window vanishes, leaving the window blank except for a single
decimal point.
f) Keep the handle firmly depressed until the new read-out
appears.
g) When the new read-out appears, release pressure on the
-------
handle. The display window retains read-out until the handle is
pushed down again to begin another measurement.
h) Push the lock switch back to the lock position when readings
are completed.
i) If the calibration check results exceed +/- 0.02 mg/cm2, the
instrument RESET is pushed before continuing. The XK-3 is
calibrated by the manufacturer.
e. Play Area Soil Collection: Field sampling personnel will identify play
areas on the property used by children in the household through information
available from the previous site visits and visible signs of use (e.g bare soil
under a swing area). For each site a site sketch will be made on the
sampling form indicating the position of the main building and any other
buildings such as sheds or garages, paved areas, and play areas. Field
personnel should also identify areas with visible tailing and collect one
composite set.
A representative number of such locations, comprising not less than 4
aliquot, will be proportionally sampled based on their relative areas and
apparent degree of use; these are then composited to produce the one
sample forwarded to the lab representing the entire play area. Exact
locations to be sampled at a given residence will be chosen per the professional
judgement of the sampling team leader, and will be fully documented on the field
sheets. A core shall be used to sample the top one inch of soil. Debris and
leafy vegetation will be removed from the top of the core, but not soil or
decomposed matter; this part of the soil sample is likely to be highest in metal
contamination. Samples will not be taken from locations within one foot of the
house foundation per story of the residence unless there is clear indication
such as areas are in use as play areas, as chipped or peeling exterior paint may
produce a typically high readings in such locations.
III. Samplft Dftlivary
All samples to be analyzed under this study will be delivered to the CLP Laboratory
in accordance with E & E SOPs or Region V SARA Sample Handling Manual. Each
set of samples will be delivered along with appropriate field documentation, Chain-
of-Custody forms, and "analytical Services Request forms(s)".
IV. Sample Receipt and Custody
A. Immediately upon receipt of study samples the CLP personnel will unpack
and inspect the shipment, sign the Chain-of-Custody from, initiate appropriate
internal tracking records, and store the samples in a secure area. If inspection of
-------
the shipment causes either the integrity or condition of the samples to be
questioned (e.g. samples not cooled, broken containers, etc.), such observations
will be noted on the Chain-of-Custody Record and brought to the attention of the
Region V RSCC or SAS Request Contract.
B. The CLP lab personnel or other appropriate personnel will be responsible for
the custody, storage, handling, and disposal of all samples received for analysis
under this plan.
1. Prior to analysis all non-aqueous samples received for analysis under
this plan will be stored at ambient temperature. All aqueous samples will
stored per CLP SAS protocols.
2. Samples will be analyzed and the data will be reported within fifteen
days of receipt of the samples. Digestates will be disposed upon completion
of data review and approval.
3. Approval must be granted before the required analyses may be
considered to be completed for each sample. Such approval will be based
upon the report of complete and appropriate data, as described in the SAS
Request.
V. Analytical Methodology
A. Preparation and analyses of the samples collected in this study will be
performed according to SAS Requests. Use of GFAA or ICP will be necessary to
meet the required levels of accuracy, precision, and sensitivity (detection limits).
Laboratory Quality Control shall be performed per SAS Requests data will be
reviewed according to CLP Functional Guidelines for Evaluating Inorganics Data.
VI Data Reduction and Validation
A. The data will be reviewed per CLP Functional Guidelines for Evaluation
Inorganics Data, with this document being the basic reference for data usability.
VII Data Reporting
A. After data review, reduction, and validation, as a primary deliverable, a disk
pr "tape" of the data shall be supplied to U.S. EPA within 30 days of the
completion of the field sampling operations.
-------
REFERENCES
1. Quality Assurance Project Plan for EPA Region V Support of
the ATSDR Multistate Lead Exposure Study; 1991
2. Urhan Soil Lead Ahatment Demostration Project: Vol. IV; Cincinnati Report
-------
ecology and environment, inc.
International Specialists in tne Environment
ANALYTICAL SERVICES CENTER
4493 Walden Avenue
Lancaster. New York 14086
Tel. (7161 685-8080, Fax: (716) 685-0852
October 20, 1995
Ms. Pat Van Leeuwen
USEPA Region 5
77 West Jackson Blvd.
HSR-6J
Chicago, IL 60604
RE: E & E Job #9501.648
Dear Ms. Van Leeuwen:
After a portion had been taken for the total metals analysis, the
soil samples from the Circle Smelting Site were dried prior to
sieving. The remaining sample was dried at 104 C for 12 hours and
then passed through a 100 mesh sieve. An intermediate step of
sieving through a larger mesh size was not taken.
Similarly, a preliminary sieving through a larger mesh was not
performed on the dust samples, nor were any debris such a fibers
physically removed from the dust samples.
The dust samples which have been identified as being unable to sieve
consisted entirely of fibers.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please
contact me at (716) 685-8080.
Sincerely,
Gary Hahn
Director - Analytical Services Center
scyciea ;aoer
-------
ecology and environment, inc.
International Specialists in the Environment
ANALYTICAL SERVICES CENTER
4493 Walden Avenue
Lancaster, New York 14086
Tel. (716) 685-8080, Fax: (716) 685-0852
October 5, 1995
Ms. Pat Van Leeuwen
USEPA Region 5
77 West Jackson Blvd.
HSR-6J
Chicago, IL 60604
Dear Ms. Van Leeuwen:
In the bid for analytical work at the Circle Smelting Site, the
request to sieve dust to 250 microns was made. The laboratory was
unclear regarding the specifics of this request. Previous
solicitations of this sort received at the laboratory specified mesh
size.
The laboratory contacted David Hendren of our Chicago office through
whom the solicitation was made. He was unable to provide any
additional information and instructed the laboratory to sieve the
samples through a mesh size which the laboratory felt was appropriate
and to document the actions taken in the final report.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please
contact me at (716) 685-8080.
Sincerely,
Gary Hahn
Director - Analytical Services Center
scvaea paper
------- |