RE-Powering America's Land Initiative:
Benefits Matrix
February 2018
RE-Powering America's
Land Initiative
Through the RE-Powering America's Land Initiative, the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) is encouraging the reuse of formerly contaminated
lands, landfills, and mine sites for renewable energy development when such
development is aligned with the community's vision for the site. Using publicly
available information, RE-Powering maintains a list of completed renewable energy
installations on contaminated sites and landfills. As part of its inventory, RE-Powering
tracks benefits associated with completed sites, such as energy cost savings,
increased revenue, and job creation.
To date, the RE-Powering Initiative has identified 253 renewable energy installations
on 238 contaminated lands, landfills, and mine sites1, with a cumulative installed
capacity of 1,398 megawatts (MW) in a total of 40 U.S. states and territories.
Although all renewable energy installations on contaminated sites likely have some
extrinsic or intrinsic value to the developer or community, the specific benefits
realized for any one project are not always touted publicly.
By researching an array of publicly available documents (including press releases,
fact sheets, and case studies), RE-Powering has identified self-reported benefits
for 204 of the total 253 renewable energy land installations that the Initiative is
tracking throughout the United States. While the RE-Powering Benefits Matrix is not
a comprehensive assessment of all benefits associated with completed renewable
energy projects on contaminated lands, it represents
the breadth and magnitude of benefits being
realized across the country by those developing
these types of installations.
Sources used to populate this document include
other EPA resources (fact sheets, case studies, etc.)
or statements by parties directly involved with their
respective projects—e.g. the city, town, or county;
site owners; developers; utilities; federal agencies;
and/or financiers. Note that the benefits reported
may have been calculated using different methods
and/or expressed in different units; therefore, a
cumulative expression of the total benefits achieved
by renewable energy projects on contaminated
lands is not possible from publicly available sources.
In addition, the specific benefits of each project can
vary due to a number of factors, including electricity
prices, site clean-up status, incentives and policies
such as renewable portfolio standards, development
costs, availability of transmission and infrastructure,
and renewable energy technology type and
capacity. That said, the most commonly reported
benefits from renewable energy on contaminated
lands include revenues from land leases and taxes,
electricity cost savings associated with the reduced
need to purchase power from the grid, job creation,
and reduced greenhouse gas emissions.
JOB
CREATION
To provide information on renewable
energy on contaminated land projects not
currently appearing in this document, email
cleaneneravtaepa.aov. To receive updates,
newsletters, and other information about the
RE-Powering program, click the banner below.
Subscribe
EPA's RE-Powering Listserv
EPA launched OEPAIand on
Twitter to help you learn
what is being done to protect
and clean up our land. Follow
@EPAIand to join the conversation.
ENERGY
SAVINGS
I POWERING
m m' I BENEFITS I
REVENUE
$
ENVIRON-
MENTAL
BENEFITS
1 In this document, installation and project refer to a single renewable energy technology installation, while site and location refer to a single contaminated property, A site or location
may have more than one installation or project, For example, the former Dave Johnston Mine (one site) has three separate wind installations, two of which reported benefits that are
highlighted here.
v>EPA
Office of Communications, Partnerships, and Analysis
Office of Land and Emergency Management
-------
RE-Powering America's Land Initiative:
Benefits Matrix
February 2018
A Range of Benefits from RE on CL
Renewable energy installations on contaminated land can provide a range of benefits to municipalities, developers, businesses,
and the environment. Some examples include:
Boxford Landfill Solar (Boxford, MA): The town of Boxford will receive economic benefits of ~$3 million over the next 20 years
from this 1-MW solar photovoltaic (PV) installation on a capped municipal landfill. These combined benefits include (1) getting
nearly all of the town's municipal annual electricity needs from the solar panels, at rates approximately 40% cheaper than the
town's current power purchase rate; (2) receiving lease revenue from the solar project financier, SunRaise Investments, LLC, and
GG Renewables, the long-term owner and operator of the project; and (3) receiving tax revenue for the life of the solar project. The
project will also generate enough energy to power the equivalent of 200 homes.
Osgood Landing Solar (North Andover, MA): The Power Purchase Agreement for this 6-MW solar PV installation on a former
manufacturing and designated state brownfield site includes a 15% discount on electricity to the town of North Andover.
Savings from the discount are estimated to reduce the town's energy bill by $160,000 in the first year. North Andover expects to
accumulate over $6M in energy savings and payment in lieu of taxes (PILOT) revenue over the life of the solar project.
Owens Corning Landfill Solar (Gloucester Township, NJ):Jh\s New Jersey community will realize $830,000 in revenue from this
3-MW solar PV project on 14 acres of the Owens Corning industrial landfill site. This revenue will come from lease payments made
by solar project owner from Marina Energy over the life of the project.
Williamson Landfill (Williamson, /VV7: This 1.5-MW solar PV system is expected to generate enough power to support all of
Williamson's town facilities. The town anticipates up to $1.5 million in savings over the 25-year life of the solar panels.
204 Renewable Energy Projects with Reported Environmental and Economic Benefits
Casselman Wind Power Project (Somerset County, PA): This 34.5-MW \
Reilly Tar& Chemical (Indianapolis, IN):
This 10.8-MW solar project on a
Superfund site created 75-100 jobs
during construction. The installation
is expected to have ongoing positive
economic impact for the life of the
project through ongoing operations and
maintenance contracts with local firms.
—. io ueniy puiunaocu
by the nearby town
^ is being purchased
of Randolph, MA,
saving millions of
dollars over the life
of the project. In
addition, Bellingham
will receive more than
$3.5 million in lease
payments and tax
revenues over the
project lifetime.
Bellingham Landfill
(Bellingham, MA):
All energy generated
by this 4.1-MW solar
PV on landfill project
J
\
j
vvEPA
This map is for informational purposes only. The information was gathered from public announcements of renewable
energy projects in the form of company press releases, news releases, and, in some cases, conversations with the
parties involved. This map may not be a comprehensive representation of all completed renewable energy projects
on contaminated lands. To provide information on additional projects, please email cleanenergy@epa.gov.
February 2018
v>EPA
2
Office of Communications, Partnerships, and Analysis
Office of Land and Emergency Management
-------
RE-Powering America's Land Initiative:
Benefits Matrix
February 2018
Inside the Numbers2
RE-Powering has documented benefits for 204 renewable energy on contaminated land installations currently tracked in the RE-
Powering Tracking Matrix. Many installations publicly reported multiple benefits; as such, the RE-Powering Benefits Matrix includes
citations of 345 total reported benefits. In addition to these, many expected benefits have not been publicly reported. Benefits are
anticipated for every RE on CL project, including energy cost savings, revenue, greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions, or a combination
of these. Although not comprehensive of all realized benefits, the following charts representa snapshot of the types of benefits RE
on CL project stakeholders are touting publicly as measures of success.
Types of Benefits Reported (AllInstallations)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
Number of times benefits were cited
Types of Benefits Reported (by Technology)
Energy Cost Savings
Environmental
Jobs
Tax or PILOT Revenue
Lease Revenue
REC Revenue
Other
97
25
12
| Solar
| Wind
I All Other Technologies
10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Number of times benefits were cited
90
100
Percentage of How Frequently
Benefits are Reported
(by Benefit Type to Date)
Environ-
mental
20%
Energy
Cost Savings
32%
Other
18%
f
Tax or
PILOT
Revenue
8%
REC
Revenue
4%
Lease
Revenue
7%
2 The"Other"category in all charts includes offsets of conventional energy generation and/or provision of on-site electricity needs; green remediation; induced economic benefits to the community
resulting from jobs created and/or construction activities (e.g., more customers for the local diner); secondary use of RE on CL installations as tools for learning and data gathering; and ability to use
RE on CL installations for distributed generation,
3 Pie chart represents percentage of benefits across 345 total benefits identified within the 204 RE on CL sites with reported benefits,
4 "All other technologies"includes one combined wind/solar installation at St, Croix Alumina Plant in the U,S, Virgin Islands,This site highlights one (1) environmental and one (1) "other" benefit,
5 The lower number of wind-related benefits is due in part to the way benefits for wind energy projects are cited. The majority of wind energy projects tracked under RE-Powering are large,
multiple-installation projects that tend to have benefits cited as a collective group. For example, the Dave Johnston Mine and GlenrockWind I and III listings in the Benefit Matrix represent
three co-located projects comprising a total of 276 MB, but the site owner has identified one primary benefit that applies to the total 276 MB,
v>EPA
Office of Communications, Partnerships, and Analysis
Office of Land and Emergency Management
-------
RE-Powering America's Land Initiative:
Benefits Matrix
February 2018
ACROSS THE COUNTRY
All RE on CL sites realize benefits—from saving money, to creating new sources
of revenue, to producing clean energy. EPA has reviewed developer and
community source data to identify documented benefits for 204 of the 253 RE on
CL sites in its Tracking Matrix. Stakeholders involved with these 204 sites note
specific benefits in terms of job creation, energy cost savings, tax or PILOT
revenue, lease revenue, REC revenue, environmental benefits, and others.
¦ llll
February 2018 Benefits Spotlight: Jobs from RE on CL Installations
One of the benefits often highlighted by stakeholders involved in renewable energy projects on contaminated properties is
the jobs created to support the renewable energy systems. Such jobs include construction work during site preparation and
renewable energy system installation, as well as longer-term jobs related to operation and maintenance of the renewable energy
systems. In many cases, these jobs are filled by members of the local community.
Representatives from at least 38 of the installations in the RE-Powering Tracking Matrix have specifically touted job creation as a
benefit of renewable energy on contaminated land projects. Examples include:
Greenwood Street Landfill Solar (Concord, MA): Installation of this 8.1 -MW solar project comprising over 28,000 solar panels
created more than 150 jobs, including an electrical crew of more than 50 workers from the local International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers (IBEW) 96. The installation also produces 20% of the city's power needs, which is expected to result in energy
credit revenue of about $10M in the system's first 10 years of operation, and will avoid producing 7,475 metric tons of carbon
dioxide annually.
Nellis Air Force Base Solar Array II (Las Vegas, NV): This 15-MW solar installation created approximately 150 jobs to support the
renewable energy installation associated upgrades to the NV Energy grid system. In addition, the new substation and distribution
lines provide a mission-critical redundant power source and protect the Base against power vulnerabilities.
Elizabeth Mine Solar (Stafford, V7y:The developer of this 7-MW solar project on a Superfund-designated former mining
site used local civil, mechanical, and electrical contractors for the project, driving employment for local economies during
installation. Grid upgrades completed during construction also benefited the community by upgrading the reliability of the
entire electrical system. The project will avoid production of 6,000 tons of carbon dioxide and provide electricity sufficient to
power 1,200 homes annually.
Falmouth Landfill Solar (Falmouth, MA): A total of 50 jobs were created during construction of this 4-MW solar project on a
former municipal solid waste landfill in Massachusetts. Total economic benefit to the community over the life of the project is
projected to be over $14 million, and the installation avoids production of 4,000 tons of carbon dioxide emissions each year.
v>EPA
4
Office of Communications, Partnerships, and Analysis
Office of Land and Emergency Management
-------
RE-Powering America's Land Initiative:
Benefits Matrix
February 2018
Clean Energy Company Partners with EPA Grant Recipient to Support Jobs for Brownfield
Solar Project
A designated brownfield on a refinery site in Richmond, CA, will soon be home to a 10.5-MW around-mounted solar
photovoltaic (PV) installation. Marin Clean Energy (MCE) is developing the 60-acre project, called Solar One, on Chevron's
Richmond Refinery property. Approximately 40 of the acres are a capped landfill, while the remaining 20 acres consist of filled
and compacted fertilizer ponds.
MCE partnered with RichmondBUILD, a public-private partnership that focuses on training for skilled construction and
renewable energy jobs, to help fill some of the 341 jobs needed to construct Solar One. All RichmondBUILD participants
come from low-income households, and more than 100 residents compete for the 35 available spots in each class. In 2015,
EPA awarded RichmondBUILD a $192,300 environmental workforce development grant from EPA to train students and place
graduates in jobs including solar energy installation and hazardous waste removal. The project is also being pursued under
an innovative procurement approach called community choice energy, or CCE, in which a public agency offers citizens and
businesses an alternative to the utility for purchasing their electricity.
The solar PV project is expected to produce enough energy to power 3,417 homes and is the largest publicly-owned solar
project in California's Bay Area to date. Pre-development costs for the installation were covered in part through Deep Green,
MCE's voluntary 100% renewable energy utility program.
A video about the project's construction features RichmondBUILD graduate Surinder Sandhu, assistant crew chief of Solar One.
Solar One is now complete, with an official ribbon-cutting expected in April.
v>EPA
5
Office of Communications, Partnerships, and Analysis
Office of Land and Emergency Management
-------
RE-Powering America's Land Initiative:
Benefits Matrix
February 2018
RE-Powering America's Land
Benefits from Reusing Potentially Contaminated Land for Renewable Energy
Lease revenue paid
to municipalities and
other site owners
Jobs created for both
construction and long-term
operations of renewable
energy installations
Energy cost
savings from
power purchase
agreements or
displacement of
other grid
generation
Other benefits, e.g. green remediation;
induced economic benefits to the
community; secondary use of RE on CL
installations as tools for learning and
data gathering; distributed generation
Environmental
benefits, such as
greenhouse gas
emissions reductions
and repurposing of
under used or
abandoned property
Revenue from renewable
energy credits (RECs), taxes,
payments in lieu of taxes
(PILOT), and other special
revenue arrangements
&EPA
6
Office of Communications, Partnerships, and Analysis
Office of Land and Emergency Management
-------
RE-Powering America's Land Initiative:
Benefits Matrix
February 2018
Through the RE-Powering America's Land initiative, the EPA encourages renewable energy development on potentially contaminated land, landfills, and mine sites when aligned with the community's
vision for the site. Using publicly available information, RE-Powering maintains a list of completed renewable energy installations on contaminated sites and landfills and compiles this information in
its ProiectTrackina Matrix. The followina list tracks benefits associated with completed sites identified and reported bv parties directlv involved with their respective projects (e.a.. information from the
associated city, town, or county; site owners; developers; utilities; and/or financiers) or from other EPA resources. Common benefits reported include revenues from land leases and taxes, electricity cost
savings associated with the reduced need to purchase power from the grid, job creation, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, et al. This resource is for informational purposes only. Please note that
the benefits listed here are not a comprehensive representation of all benefits associated with completed renewable energy projects on contaminated lands and such benefits are calculated in
various ways; nevertheless, this list illustrates the breadth of benefits being realized and highlighted across the country by those developing these types of installations.
Site/Project Name
State
City
Type of
Site
Site
Ownership
Type
RE Type
Project
Capacity
(MW)
Project Type
Completion
Date
Summary of Benefits Identified in
Publicly Available Sources
Energy Savings
Revenue
Environmental
Job Creation
Other
AZ- ARIZONA
Ajo Solar Project
AZ
Ajo
Mine Lands
Private
Solar
5
Wholesale
Electricity
2011
Half of the approximately 50 construction jobs went to local
residents. The electricity generated onsite will be sold to
Arizona Public Service (APS) under a 25-year power-purchasing
agreement.
Apache Powder
AZ
Benson
Superfund
Private
Solar
0.0014
Onsite Use - Green
Remediation
1997
The use of solar and wind energy to power cleanup reduces
the 30-year groundwater cleanup cost from $25 million to
approximately $2.5 million. The cost of solar PV system and
windmill pump is three times less expensive than the cost to run
power lines and pay for electricity at remote areas of the site.
Bagdad Mine Solar
AZ
Bagdad
(census-
designated)
Mine Lands
Private
Solar
15
Wholesale
Electricity
2011
Power generated by the solar is sold to Freeport-McMoRan
at a set rate under the terms of a 25-year power purchase
agreement. Generates 15 megawatts of electricity, enough to
power about 3,000 homes.
Desert Star Solar Plant
AZ
Buckeye
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
10
Wholesale
Electricity
2015
Estimated $15,000,000 -$20,000,000 of direct and indirect
investments were made to the local economy from this project.
More than 100 construction jobs.
CA-CALIFORNIA
Aerojet General
Corporation Superfund
Site
CA
Sacramento
Superfund
Private
Solar
6
Wholesale
Electricity
2010
The project is anticipated to save more than $10 million in
electricity over the cleanup project's 25-year life, due to the
lower cost of electricity purchasing established by the PPA.
Camp Pendleton
CA
Camp
Pendleton
Superfund
Federal
Solar
1.5
Wholesale
Electricity
2011
The Naval Facilities Engineering Command anticipates the
system will save the Marine Corps $336,000 yearly in electricity
costs while more than tripling its previous solar energy capacity.
Cloverdale Landfill
CA
Cloverdale
Landfill
N/A
Solar
1.8
Wholesale
Electricity
2014
The Cloverdale project is designed to generate over 2.7 million
kilowatt hours of energy annually, the equivalent of more than
6,000,000 pounds of C02.
Fischer Properties: Depot
Park
CA
Sacramento
Brownfield
Private
Solar
3
Wholesale
Electricity
2010
The project provides more than 40% of the electricity load for
the park during peak hours. That is equivalent to 6,335 barrels of
oil, or removing 500 vehicles from the road.
v>EPA
7
Office of Communications, Partnerships, and Analysis
Office of Land and Emergency Management
-------
RE-Powering America's Land Initiative:
Benefits Matrix
February 2018
Through the RE-Powering America's Land initiative, the EPA encourages renewable energy development on potentially contaminated land, landfills, and mine sites when aligned with the community's
vision for the site. Using publicly available information, RE-Powering maintains a list of completed renewable energy installations on contaminated sites and landfills and compiles this information in
its ProiectTrackina Matrix. The followina list tracks benefits associated with completed sites identified and reported bv parties directlv involved with their respective projects (e.a.. information from the
associated city, town, or county; site owners; developers; utilities; and/or financiers) or from other EPA resources. Common benefits reported include revenues from land leases and taxes, electricity cost
savings associated with the reduced need to purchase power from the grid, job creation, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, et al. This resource is for informational purposes only. Please note that
the benefits listed here are not a comprehensive representation of all benefits associated with completed renewable energy projects on contaminated lands and such benefits are calculated in
various ways; nevertheless, this list illustrates the breadth of benefits being realized and highlighted across the country by those developing these types of installations.
Site/Project Name
State
City
Type of
Site
Site
Ownership
Type
RE Type
Project
Capacity
(MW)
Project Type
Completion
Date
Summary of Benefits Identified in
Publicly Available Sources
Energy Savings
Revenue
Environmental
Job Creation
Other
Frontier Fertilizer
CA
Davis
Superfund
Private
Solar
0.06888
Onsite Use - Green
Remediation
2011
The system offsets up to 5% of the site's annual electricity use
for pump and treat system operations, saving energy costs of
approximately $1,500 per year.
Lawrence Livermore
National Laboratory
CA
Livermore
Superfund
Federal
Solar
0.004
Onsite Use - Green
Remediation
2009
The self-powered solar treatment units allow ground water
treatment at remote areas of the 7,000-acre site without the
installation of costly power lines or generators.
Milliken Landfill
CA
Ontario
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
3.1
Wholesale
Electricity
2017
Produces enough electricity to power 500 homes.
NASA Jet Propulsion
Laboratory (JPL)
CA
Pasadena
Superfund
Federal
Solar
0.564
Rooftop
2011
Under a 20-year power purchase agreement, the PV system
is expected to annually generate 869,158 kWh of energy
(approximately 20% of the treatment system's electricity
consumption, or the equivalent power used by 100 to 125
average Pasadena homes).
Pemaco Superfund Site
CA
Maywood
Superfund
Municipal
Solar
0.006
Onsite Use - Green
Remediation
2007
Annual electricity cost savings of $2,839.
PSEG Pittsburg Solar
Energy Center
CA
Pittsburg
Landfill
Private
Solar
25.4
Wholesale
Electricity
2015
Will help PG&E meet California's mandate that 33% of the
energy sold by investor-owned utilities must come from
renewable resources by 2020.
Regulus Solar Power Plant
CA
Bakersfield
Brownfield
N/A
Solar
82
Wholesale
Electricity
2015
The project will contribute to the creation of 1,300 full time
equivalent employee years, $6.1 M in property taxes and $25.4M
in sales generated for the county over 20-year life of project. It
is anticipated to provide almost $184 million in revenue to local
businesses, governments and households during the first 20
years of operation.
Sutter's Landing Landfill
Solar
CA
Sacramento
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
1.5
Wholesale
Electricity
2014
Revenue from the power generated for and consumed by
residents and businesses, and from lease payments, will be
re-invested to fund park preservation and maintenance. Lease
payments to city of $ 15,000 per year.
Tequesquite Landfill
CA
Riverside
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
7.5
Wholesale
Electricity
2015
A 25-year PPA will help Riverside Public Utilities minimize the
effect of rising electricity costs.
v>EPA
Office of Communications, Partnerships, and Analysis
Office of Land and Emergency Management
-------
RE-Powering America's Land Initiative:
Benefits Matrix
February 2018
Through the RE-Powering America's Land initiative, the EPA encourages renewable energy development on potentially contaminated land, landfills, and mine sites when aligned with the community's
vision for the site. Using publicly available information, RE-Powering maintains a list of completed renewable energy installations on contaminated sites and landfills and compiles this information in
its ProiectTrackina Matrix. The followina list tracks benefits associated with completed sites identified and reported bv parties directlv involved with their respective projects (e.a.. information from the
associated city, town, or county; site owners; developers; utilities; and/or financiers) or from other EPA resources. Common benefits reported include revenues from land leases and taxes, electricity cost
savings associated with the reduced need to purchase power from the grid, job creation, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, et al. This resource is for informational purposes only. Please note that
the benefits listed here are not a comprehensive representation of all benefits associated with completed renewable energy projects on contaminated lands and such benefits are calculated in
various ways; nevertheless, this list illustrates the breadth of benefits being realized and highlighted across the country by those developing these types of installations.
Site/Project Name
State
City
Type of
Site
Site
Ownership
Type
RE Type
Project
Capacity
(MW)
Project Type
Completion
Date
Summary of Benefits Identified in
Publicly Available Sources
Energy Savings
Revenue
Environmental
Job Creation
Other
Travis Air Force Base
CA
Near Fairfield
Superfund
Federal
Solar
Onsite Use - Green
Remediation
2008
Brings Travis Air Force Base one step closer to shutting down
its four groundwater treatment plants that currently cost about
$7,000 a month in utilities to operate.
West County Wastewater
District
CA
Richmond
Brownfield
Municipal
Solar
1
Onsite Use -
General
2008
West County Wastewater District will purchase energy at a fixed
price over the next 20 years, providing a cost-saving. PG&E's Self
Generation Incentive Program mitigated project cost. The PV
system is estimated to produce 30% of the wastewater facility's
electricity needs.
Western Regional Sanitary
Landfill
CA
Lincoln
MSW
Landfill
Private
Solar
0.009
Onsite Use -
General
2017
WPWMA will be saving $.04 per kWh over what it would
otherwise be paying PG&E—savings that are ultimately passed
along to landfill ratepayers. More than 25 local students from
Sierra College gained hands-on training for solar jobs by
designing and installation the system. Solar powers the landfill's
LFG power plant.
CO - COLORADO
Aurora/Arapahoe Solar
Array
CO
Aurora
Brownfield
Public
Solar
0.5
Community
Owned/
Subscription
2013
Lifetime Production 1,980,738 kWh, as of April 13,2016. As
of April 13,2016, customer savings from energy production
$725,004.
Belmar Mixed Use
Development
CO
Lake wood
Brownfield
Other
Solar
1.7
Rooftop
2008
The system supplies all the electricity for the parking garages at
the shopping mall, which is equivalent to 5% of Bel mar's energy
use. A PPA uses RECs in exchange for below-retail electricity
rates. The system generates enough energy to power 350
homes.
Boulder Cowdery
Meadows Solar Array
CO
Boulder
Superfund
Private
Solar
0.5
Community
Owned /
Subscription
2013
Lifetime Production 2,136,641 kWh, April 13,2016. As of April 13,
2016, customer savings from energy production $462,168.
Dreher Pickle Plant
CO
Fort Collins
State
Brownfield
Municipal
Solar
0.62
Wholesale
Electricity
2015
Community solar project - Estimated that customers will receive
a 6.9% payback on their solar panels in the first year and an
average annual payback of 9.5% over the solar array's lifetime.
Fort Carson
CO
Fort Carson
RCRA
Federal
Solar
2
Wholesale
Electricity
2008
Project expected to save Fort Carson $500,000 in energy costs
over the life of its 20-year contract with the utility.
v>EPA
9
Office of Communications, Partnerships, and Analysis
Office of Land and Emergency Management
-------
RE-Powering America's Land Initiative:
Benefits Matrix
February 2018
Through the RE-Powering America's Land initiative, the EPA encourages renewable energy development on potentially contaminated land, landfills, and mine sites when aligned with the community's
vision for the site. Using publicly available information, RE-Powering maintains a list of completed renewable energy installations on contaminated sites and landfills and compiles this information in
its ProiectTrackina Matrix. The followina list tracks benefits associated with completed sites identified and reported bv parties directlv involved with their respective projects (e.a.. information from the
associated city, town, or county; site owners; developers; utilities; and/or financiers) or from other EPA resources. Common benefits reported include revenues from land leases and taxes, electricity cost
savings associated with the reduced need to purchase power from the grid, job creation, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, et al. This resource is for informational purposes only. Please note that
the benefits listed here are not a comprehensive representation of all benefits associated with completed renewable energy projects on contaminated lands and such benefits are calculated in
various ways; nevertheless, this list illustrates the breadth of benefits being realized and highlighted across the country by those developing these types of installations.
Site/Project Name
State
City
Type of
Site
Site
Ownership
Type
RE Type
Project
Capacity
(MW)
Project Type
Completion
Date
Summary of Benefits Identified in
Publicly Available Sources
Energy Savings
Revenue
Environmental
Job Creation
Other
New Rifle Mill
CO
Rifle
Other
Municipal
Solar
1.7
Onsite Use -
General
2009
Siting the project on contaminated land already owned by the
city saved taxpayers approx. $2 million.
Norwood Landfill
Community Solar
CO
Norwood
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
0.2
Wholesale
Electricity
2016
Will lower the electric bills of qualified low-income residents in
SMPA's service territory.
Place Bridge Academy
CO
Denver
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
0.101
Onsite Use -
General
2013
Schools are not required to pay up-front costs for the systems,
and will realize an overall cost savings on their electricity bills.
Schools will incorporate an education component.The following
environmental benefits will also be realized: 142,274 kWh of
electricity production; 291,377 pounds per year of annual C02
emissions reduced; 318,713 miles per year equivalent reduction
in vehicle miles driven and equivalent 11,207 trees planted.
Summitville Mine
Superfund Site
CO
Del Norte
Superfund
Federal
Hydro
0.032
Onsite Use - Green
Remediation
2011
Hydroelectric plant will generate approximately 145,000 kWh
per year - enough to power about 20 households, and prevent
120 metric tons of carbon dioxide from being released into the
atmosphere every year. It is anticipated that the hydroelectric
plant will provide 15 to 20% of the electricity needed to operate
the existing water treatment plant.
CT-CONNECTICUT
Bridgeport Landfill
CT
Bridgeport
MSW
Landfill
Private
Solar
2.2
Wholesale
Electricity
2016
Full energy park (2.2-MW solar and 2.8-MWfuel cell) expected to
provide $7M to city in lease revenue over the course of the 20-
year lease; create 92 jobs; and provide power for the equivalent
of 5,000 homes annually
Derby Landfill
CT
Derby
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
0.55
Wholesale
Electricity
2015
Energy from panels will be used to reduce town's electricity
expenses by 15-20% over the next two decades.
Evansville Ave. Landfill
Solar
CT
Meriden
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
1.1
Wholesale
Electricity
2017
Solar project offsets power needs of co-located water pollution
control facility. City will save anywhere from $31,708 to $106,222
annually, or $634,150 to $2.2 million over the 20-year contract
term (depending on future cost of electricity). City will also
receive annual tax payments over the 20-year contract totaling
$235,923. No cost to the city for this project.
v>EPA
10
Office of Communications, Partnerships, and Analysis
Office of Land and Emergency Management
-------
RE-Powering America's Land Initiative:
Benefits Matrix
February 2018
Through the RE-Powering America's Land initiative, the EPA encourages renewable energy development on potentially contaminated land, landfills, and mine sites when aligned with the community's
vision for the site. Using publicly available information, RE-Powering maintains a list of completed renewable energy installations on contaminated sites and landfills and compiles this information in
its ProiectTrackina Matrix. The followina list tracks benefits associated with completed sites identified and reported bv parties directlv involved with their respective projects (e.a.. information from the
associated city, town, or county; site owners; developers; utilities; and/or financiers) or from other EPA resources. Common benefits reported include revenues from land leases and taxes, electricity cost
savings associated with the reduced need to purchase power from the grid, job creation, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, et al. This resource is for informational purposes only. Please note that
the benefits listed here are not a comprehensive representation of all benefits associated with completed renewable energy projects on contaminated lands and such benefits are calculated in
various ways; nevertheless, this list illustrates the breadth of benefits being realized and highlighted across the country by those developing these types of installations.
Site/Project Name
State
City
Type of
Site
Site
Ownership
Type
RE Type
Project
Capacity
(MW)
Project Type
Completion
Date
Summary of Benefits Identified in
Publicly Available Sources
Energy Savings
Revenue
Environmental
Job Creation
Other
Hartford CT Landfill (Solar)
CT
Hartford
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
1
Wholesale
Electricity
2014
The facility will sell excess electricity to the grid or, potentially,
to the City of Hartford at a discounted rate that could save the
City several hundred thousand dollars per year on its electricity
bill. In addition, in 2012, Connecticut Light & Power selected the
project to receive zero - emission renewable energy credits, or
ZRECs. The ZRECs add 11 cents per kilowatt - hour to the price of
electricity generated for sale by the solar collectors. The system
will generate up to one megawatt of electricity, enough to
power about 1,000 homes when operating at full capacity.
North Haven Landfill
CT
North Haven
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
0.384
On-site Use -
General
2017
Powers on-site wastewater treatment facility.
Wintergreen Ave. Landfill
CT
New Haven
MSW
Landfill
Private
Solar
1
Wholesale
Electricity
2016
Minimum savings [for the town] of $30,000 per year
DE - DELAWARE
DuPont Newport
DE
Newport
Superfund
Private
Solar
0.5
Wholesale
Electricity
2013
Construction created nearly 120 jobs.
McKees Solar Park
DE
Newark
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
0.23
Wholesale
Electricity
2014
Funding model wherein residential electric users can contribute
$50 in return for a $0.01 per kWh rebate on one (1) 100 kilowatt-
hour block of power generated from the park per month, which
will displace the first 100 kwh of household consumption.
Residents can also make outright tax-deductible donations to
the park.
FL- FLORIDA
Lake Worth Landfill
FL
Lake Worth
MSW
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
2
Wholesale
Electricity
2017
Helps meet city's commitment to diversifying the city's energy
to clean and renewable energy sources
GA-GEORGIA
Hickory Ridge Landfill
GA
Atlanta
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
1
Wholesale
Electricity
2011
Enough energy to meet the needs of 224 homes annually
~
v>EPA
11
Office of Communications, Partnerships, and Analysis
Office of Land and Emergency Management
-------
RE-Powering America's Land Initiative:
Benefits Matrix
February 2018
Through the RE-Powering America's Land initiative, the EPA encourages renewable energy development on potentially contaminated land, landfills, and mine sites when aligned with the community's
vision for the site. Using publicly available information, RE-Powering maintains a list of completed renewable energy installations on contaminated sites and landfills and compiles this information in
its ProiectTrackina Matrix. The followina list tracks benefits associated with completed sites identified and reported bv parties directlv involved with their respective projects (e.a.. information from the
associated city, town, or county; site owners; developers; utilities; and/or financiers) or from other EPA resources. Common benefits reported include revenues from land leases and taxes, electricity cost
savings associated with the reduced need to purchase power from the grid, job creation, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, et al. This resource is for informational purposes only. Please note that
the benefits listed here are not a comprehensive representation of all benefits associated with completed renewable energy projects on contaminated lands and such benefits are calculated in
various ways; nevertheless, this list illustrates the breadth of benefits being realized and highlighted across the country by those developing these types of installations.
Site/Project Name
State
City
Type of
Site
Site
Ownership
Type
RE Type
Project
Capacity
(MW)
Project Type
Completion
Date
Summary of Benefits Identified in
Publicly Available Sources
Energy Savings
Revenue
Environmental
Job Creation
Other
HI - HAWAII
Kapolei Sustainable
Energy Park
HI
Kapolei
RCRA
Private
Solar
1.2
Wholesale
Electricity
2011
The system will produce enough electricity to power between
150 and 250 homes with clean, solar energy.
IA - IOWA
Schaus-Vorhies Solar
IA
Fairfield
Brownfield
Private
Solar
0.5
Wholesale
Electricity
2016
System will pay for itself within 5-6 years, and cover 100% of the
company's electrical needs on a net-annual bases. Total energy
production (over 25 years) will prevent 10,587 metric tons of C02
from entering the atmosphere, equivalent to about 11 million
pounds of coal or 25 million miles driven in a typical passenger
car.
CT-CONNECTICUT
Exelon City Solar
IL
Chicago
Brownfield
Municipal
Solar
10
Wholesale
Electricity
2010
During construction, the $60 million project created 200
jobs. The developers sou reed much of its labor and building
materials from local companies on Chicago's South Side. The
system provides permanent work in the areas of operations,
maintenance, and security. The project also expands the local
tax base and generates revenues from the land lease.
Gobnob Wind Turbine
Project
IL
Farmersville
Brownfield
State
Wind
0.9
Wholesale
Electricity
2009
The Rural Electric Convenience Cooperative signed a 20-year
lease agreement with the Department of Natural Resources for
$1,200 per year. The system will result in a reduction in GHG
emissions of 1,997 tons of carbon dioxide annually.
Kokomo Solar Park
IL
Kokomo
Superfund
Private
Solar
7
Wholesale
Electricity
2016
Provides 7 MW of clean power capacity to the community and is
located on a remediated Superfund parcel of land
v>EPA
12
Office of Communications, Partnerships, and Analysis
Office of Land and Emergency Management
-------
RE-Powering America's Land Initiative:
Benefits Matrix
February 2018
Through the RE-Powering America's Land initiative, the EPA encourages renewable energy development on potentially contaminated land, landfills, and mine sites when aligned with the community's
vision for the site. Using publicly available information, RE-Powering maintains a list of completed renewable energy installations on contaminated sites and landfills and compiles this information in
its ProiectTrackina Matrix. The followina list tracks benefits associated with completed sites identified and reported bv parties directlv involved with their respective projects (e.a.. information from the
associated city, town, or county; site owners; developers; utilities; and/or financiers) or from other EPA resources. Common benefits reported include revenues from land leases and taxes, electricity cost
savings associated with the reduced need to purchase power from the grid, job creation, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, et al. This resource is for informational purposes only. Please note that
the benefits listed here are not a comprehensive representation of all benefits associated with completed renewable energy projects on contaminated lands and such benefits are calculated in
various ways; nevertheless, this list illustrates the breadth of benefits being realized and highlighted across the country by those developing these types of installations.
Site/Project Name
State
City
Type of
Site
Site
Ownership
Type
RE Type
Project
Capacity
(MW)
Project Type
Completion
Date
Summary of Benefits Identified in
Publicly Available Sources
Energy Savings
Revenue
Environmental
Job Creation
Other
IN-INDIANA
Reilly Tar & Chemical
(Indianapolis)
IN
Indianapolis
Superfund
Private
Solar
10.8
Wholesale
Electricity
2014
Under the 15-year PPA with Indianapolis Power and Light
(IPL), developer Hanwha Q CELLS will sell electricity and
environmental attributes from Maywood Solar Farm for 15 years.
IPL will purchase 100% of the output at a set price ($.020/kWh)
and will retain ownership of project RECs.The project created
75-100 jobs during construction and will continue to have a
positive impact on the economy through ongoing operating
and maintenance contracts with local firms during the 15-to
35-year operating period of the facility.
KY-KENTUCKY
Fort Campbell Solar Phase
One
KY
Fort Campbell
Landfill
Federal
Solar
1.9
Onsite Use
2015
Helps Fort Campbell meet federal directives outlined in the
American Renewable Energy Act, requiring federal installations
to obtain 25 percent of their energy by renewable means by
2025.
Fort Campbell Solar Phase
Two
KY
Fort Campbell
Landfill
Federal
Solar
3.1
Wholesale
Electricity
2017
Combined with Phase One of the installation, provides a total of
5 MW of solar to Fort Campbell. Expected to reduce the post's
energy load on the power grid and help save money that will be
repurposed toward training soldiers.
MA - MASSACHUSETTS
Acton Landfill
MA
Acton
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
1.6
Wholesale
Electricity
2013
If the market rate for electricity remains at least one penny per
kWh above the fixed contract rate, the predicted cost savings
from the landfill solar system totals over $325,000 for the 20 year
period (more than $15,000 per year). If the market rate stays at
the Town's average 2013 rate or increases, Acton will save over
$1,700,000 over the 20 year period, or $85,000 per year.
Aquinnah Landfill
MA
Aquinnah
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
0.05
Onsite Use -
General
2012
The array will produce enough energy to power theTown's
Municipal electrical load including the Town offices, police&
fire stations, library, street lights, and public bathrooms and
eventually save the town over $10,000 per year in electricity costs.
Barnstable Landfill
MA
Barnstable
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
4.2
Wholesale
Electricity
2014
Estimated annual savings for the town of over $270,000
v>EPA
13
Office of Communications, Partnerships, and Analysis
Office of Land and Emergency Management
-------
RE-Powering America's Land Initiative:
Benefits Matrix
February 2018
Through the RE-Powering America's Land initiative, the EPA encourages renewable energy development on potentially contaminated land, landfills, and mine sites when aligned with the community's
vision for the site. Using publicly available information, RE-Powering maintains a list of completed renewable energy installations on contaminated sites and landfills and compiles this information in
its ProiectTrackina Matrix. The followina list tracks benefits associated with completed sites identified and reported bv parties directlv involved with their respective projects (e.a.. information from the
associated city, town, or county; site owners; developers; utilities; and/or financiers) or from other EPA resources. Common benefits reported include revenues from land leases and taxes, electricity cost
savings associated with the reduced need to purchase power from the grid, job creation, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, et al. This resource is for informational purposes only. Please note that
the benefits listed here are not a comprehensive representation of all benefits associated with completed renewable energy projects on contaminated lands and such benefits are calculated in
various ways; nevertheless, this list illustrates the breadth of benefits being realized and highlighted across the country by those developing these types of installations.
Site/Project Name
State
City
Type of
Site
Site
Ownership
Type
RE Type
Project
Capacity
(MW)
Project Type
Completion
Date
Summary of Benefits Identified in
Publicly Available Sources
Energy Savings
Revenue
Environmental
Job Creation
Other
Beech St. Landfill
MA
Rockland
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
3.2
Wholesale
Electricity
2014
The town has 25-year PPA with NextSun and has locked in a
rate of $0.0699/kWh for the first year and 2% increase in annual
power rates after that versus original rates of $0.07887/kWh. A
land lease will generate revenue of $50,000 per year. The project
will save Rockland taxpayers through lower electricity prices,
saved tax revenue, and provide a hedge against future energy
rate hikes.
Bellingham Landfill
MA
Bellingham
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
4.1
Wholesale
Electricity
2017
Energy generated is being purchased by the town of Randolph,
saving millions of dollars over the life of the project. Town will
receive a total of over $3.5 million in lease payments and tax
revenues for the project.
Bent Mill Solar
MA
Gardner
Brownfield
Municipal
Solar
1
Wholesale
Electricity
2014
City of Gardner benefits from the land lease and tax payments.
Four local organizations are saving tens of thousands of dollars
on their annual electricity bills, including GAAMHA, Inc., a non-
profit provider of services for adults with disabilities. GAAMHA
estimates they will see savings of at least $10,000 annually.
(Financier source)
Bolton Orchards
MA
Bolton
Brownfield
Private
Solar
6
Wholesale
Electricity
2013
Chelmsford's Town Manager negotiated a 25-year Net Metering
Power Sales Agreement (NMPSA) with Main Street Power, who
owns and operates the facility. The Town of Chelmsford receives
25 years of discounted electricity rates for the energy produced
by the solar facility under the NMPSA. The project will provide
tax revenue to town of Bolton and power to town of Chelmsford
(higher demand than Bolton).
Boxford Landfill
MA
Boxford
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
1
Wholesale
Electricity
2017
Town touts economic benefits of ~$3 million over the next 20
years, receiving: (1) nearly all of the town's municipal annual
electricity needs from the solar project, using clean electricity
that is approximately 40% cheaper than the town's current
power purchase rate; (2) revenue in exchange for leasing the
capped landfill to the solar project's owner and the partnership
that acquired and constructed the project with plans to remain
the long-term owner and operator; and (3) tax revenue for the
life of the solar project. Solar will also power the equivalent of
200 homes.
v>EPA
14
Office of Communications, Partnerships, and Analysis
Office of Land and Emergency Management
-------
RE-Powering America's Land Initiative:
Benefits Matrix
February 2018
Through the RE-Powering America's Land initiative, the EPA encourages renewable energy development on potentially contaminated land, landfills, and mine sites when aligned with the community's
vision for the site. Using publicly available information, RE-Powering maintains a list of completed renewable energy installations on contaminated sites and landfills and compiles this information in
its ProiectTrackina Matrix. The followina list tracks benefits associated with completed sites identified and reported bv parties directlv involved with their respective projects (e.a.. information from the
associated city, town, or county; site owners; developers; utilities; and/or financiers) or from other EPA resources. Common benefits reported include revenues from land leases and taxes, electricity cost
savings associated with the reduced need to purchase power from the grid, job creation, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, et al. This resource is for informational purposes only. Please note that
the benefits listed here are not a comprehensive representation of all benefits associated with completed renewable energy projects on contaminated lands and such benefits are calculated in
various ways; nevertheless, this list illustrates the breadth of benefits being realized and highlighted across the country by those developing these types of installations.
Site/Project Name
State
City
Type of
Site
Site
Ownership
Type
RE Type
Project
Capacity
(MW)
Project Type
Completion
Date
Summary of Benefits Identified in
Publicly Available Sources
Energy Savings
Revenue
Environmental
Job Creation
Other
Braintree Landfill
MA
Braintree
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
1.26
Wholesale
Electricity
2014
The Braintree Electric Light Department has an agreement to
buy the electricity that the site produces at a competitive rate of
6.5 cents per kilowatt (from Braintree Electric Light Department
general manager William Bottiggi). Over the course of a year
the project is expected to generate 1,645,000 kilowatt-hours of
electricity—enough to power to more than 200 homes.
Brewster Landfill
MA
Brewster
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
1.23
Wholesale
Electricity
2014
The project is expected to save town $75,685 in the first year.
Bridge Street Landfill
MA
Fairhaven
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
1.8
Wholesale
Electricity
2013
The town is expected to save $1,5M over 30 years. A PPA allows
town to avoid costs associated with solar system ownership.
Brockton Brightfield
MA
Brockton
Brownfield
Municipal
Solar
0.46
Wholesale
Electricity
2006
Generates nearly $145,000 in annual revenue for the city, which
goes towards paying off the cost to build and maintain the
brightfield. It is estimated that the loan will be paid off in full by
2026, and the city will begin to directly profit from the sale of
RECs and electricity. The brightfield has a module warranty of 20
years, and with an expected system life of 30-50 years, the city
should see profits for 10 to 30 years.
Cedar Street Landfill
MA
Cohasset
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
0.42
Wholesale
Electricity
2017
Town could net as much as $1.6 million in energy cost savings
over the 20-year contract, depending on net metering credit
rates. Solar will produce power equal to approximately 16% of
the town's annual electric load.
Charles George Landfill
MA
Tyngsboro/
Dunstable
Landfill
Private
Solar
3.56
Wholesale
Electricity
2017
Produces nearly 4,600,000 kWh of electricity per year, enough
to power approximately 460 New England homes and avoid the
release of over 3,500 tons of carbon dioxide annually from non-
renewable power plants.
Chatham Landfill
MA
Chatham
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
1.8
Wholesale
Electricity
2014
Estimated to save town $120,446 in the first year and more than
$3.5M by the end of the 20-year PPA.
Chicopee Elks Landfill
MA
Chicopee
Landfill
Private
Solar
2.1
Wholesale
Electricity
2015
Power sold to Chicopee Electric & Light at a discount, saving
ratepayers money on their utility bill. 55 jobs created.
Chilmark Landfill
MA
Chilmark
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
0.099
Wholesale
Electricity
2014
System offsets 60% of town's historical energy usage. In first
year of operation, saved town $2,374 from net metering (as of
Sept 2015).
v>EPA
15
Office of Communications, Partnerships, and Analysis
Office of Land and Emergency Management
-------
RE-Powering America's Land Initiative:
Benefits Matrix
February 2018
Through the RE-Powering America's Land initiative, the EPA encourages renewable energy development on potentially contaminated land, landfills, and mine sites when aligned with the community's
vision for the site. Using publicly available information, RE-Powering maintains a list of completed renewable energy installations on contaminated sites and landfills and compiles this information in
its ProiectTrackina Matrix. The followina list tracks benefits associated with completed sites identified and reported bv parties directlv involved with their respective projects (e.a.. information from the
associated city, town, or county; site owners; developers; utilities; and/or financiers) or from other EPA resources. Common benefits reported include revenues from land leases and taxes, electricity cost
savings associated with the reduced need to purchase power from the grid, job creation, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, et al. This resource is for informational purposes only. Please note that
the benefits listed here are not a comprehensive representation of all benefits associated with completed renewable energy projects on contaminated lands and such benefits are calculated in
various ways; nevertheless, this list illustrates the breadth of benefits being realized and highlighted across the country by those developing these types of installations.
Site/Project Name
State
City
Type of
Site
Site
Ownership
Type
RE Type
Project
Capacity
(MW)
Project Type
Completion
Date
Summary of Benefits Identified in
Publicly Available Sources
Energy Savings
Revenue
Environmental
Job Creation
Other
Concord Landfill Phase 1
MA
Concord
Landfill
Private
Solar
1.7
Wholesale
Electricity
2014
Total installation (full 2.9 MW) expected to produce 2% of town's
electricity needs. Enough energy to provide almost 400 homes
with their annual energy needs.
Cottage Street Landfill
MA
Springfield
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
3.9
Wholesale
Electricity
2014
Estimated to have brought $22 million of construction revenue
to the region.
Cowles Gravel Solar
MA
Westfield
Brownfield
Private
Solar
2.6
Wholesale
Electricity
2016
Solar development will provide lease revenue to the town.
Developer made several site improvements, including grinding
an existing stockpile on the site of more than 56,000 tons of
asphalt from roads and other demolition and construction
debris to grade the site for solar and erecting a fence to deter
off-road vehicles from entering (which was a prior issue in the
community).
Dorchester Solar Power
Project
MA
Dorchester
Brownfield
Private
Solar
1.3
Wholesale
Electricity
2012
Over a 30 year period, this system is expected to save
approximately 4,000 pounds of sulfur dioxide, 1,800 pounds of
nitrous oxide, and 1.8 million pounds of carbon dioxide. This is
equivalent to the emissions produced in generating electricity
for 260 average household.
Dover Landfill
MA
Dover
Landfill
Private
Solar
1.4
Wholesale
Electricity
2017
Will allow Dover and Boston metro residents to enjoy local
clean energy at no cost to join, while saving them 10 percent
on their electricity bills. Expected to avoid approximately 1,300
metric tons of C02 each year, equivalent to removing 270 cars
from the roads. Created local jobs. Helped Dover achieve Green
Community status, which will allow the town to apply for
additional grant money from the state.
Duxbury Landfill
MA
Duxbury
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
0.585
Wholesale
Electricity
2014
The system should meet 15% of town's electricity needs
and save $45,000 per year. The project will generate enough
electricity for over 100 homes.
Eastham Landfill
MA
Eastham
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
0.59
Wholesale
Electricity
2014
Savings from the system are estimated to be $34,010 in first
year. The 627 kW array will provide green energy to the Town of
Eastham, decreasing their carbon footprint and their utility bills.
Everett Solar Power
Project
MA
Everett
Brownfield
Private
Solar
0.605
Wholesale
Electricity
2010
The project provides added tax revenue for Everett and helps
National Grid temporarily offset customer demand as the load in
the area steadily increases
v>EPA
16
Office of Communications, Partnerships, and Analysis
Office of Land and Emergency Management
-------
RE-Powering America's Land Initiative:
Benefits Matrix
February 2018
Through the RE-Powering America's Land initiative, the EPA encourages renewable energy development on potentially contaminated land, landfills, and mine sites when aligned with the community's
vision for the site. Using publicly available information, RE-Powering maintains a list of completed renewable energy installations on contaminated sites and landfills and compiles this information in
its ProiectTrackina Matrix. The followina list tracks benefits associated with completed sites identified and reported bv parties directlv involved with their respective projects (e.a.. information from the
associated city, town, or county; site owners; developers; utilities; and/or financiers) or from other EPA resources. Common benefits reported include revenues from land leases and taxes, electricity cost
savings associated with the reduced need to purchase power from the grid, job creation, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, et al. This resource is for informational purposes only. Please note that
the benefits listed here are not a comprehensive representation of all benefits associated with completed renewable energy projects on contaminated lands and such benefits are calculated in
various ways; nevertheless, this list illustrates the breadth of benefits being realized and highlighted across the country by those developing these types of installations.
Site/Project Name
State
City
Type of
Site
Site
Ownership
Type
RE Type
Project
Capacity
(MW)
Project Type
Completion
Date
Summary of Benefits Identified in
Publicly Available Sources
Energy Savings
Revenue
Environmental
Job Creation
Other
Fairhaven Sanitary Landfill
(Canton)
MA
Canton
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
5.6
Wholesale
Electricity
2012
The electricity produced by the solar system is expected to save
the town approximately $1.5 million over the course of the 30
year contract.
Falmouth Landfill
MA
Falmouth
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
4
Wholesale
Electricity
2017
Total economic benefit to the community over the life of the
project is projected to be over $14 million. Installation avoids
the equivalent of4,000 tons of C02 emissions each year. Fifty
(50) jobs created during construction.
Former Grasso Landfill
MA
Agawam
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
1.98
Wholesale
Electricity
2013
Makes the nearby, energy-intensive Hood plant more
competitive in today's challenging business environment, while
providing new tax revenue to Agawam.
Greenfield Solar Farm
MA
Greenfield
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
2
Wholesale
Electricity
2012
The system is projected to save city $250,000 in first year of
operation and created 50 local jobs.
Greenwood St. Landfill
MA
Worcester
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
8.1
Wholesale
Electricity
2017
Created 150+jobs, including an electrical crew of 50+ workers
from the local IBEW 96. Produces 20% of city's power needs.
Expected energy savings of up to $2M and revenue from energy
credits in first 10 years valued at $10M. Will avoid 7,475 metric
tons of C02 annually, equivalent to the amount emitted from
driving -18,000,000 miles.
Groton Landfill Solar
MA
Groton
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
2.93
Wholesale
Electricity
2016
Will provide 25% of Groton Electric Light Department's required
electricity during the middle of the day in the spring and fall
Harwich Municipal Landfill
MA
Harwich
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
1.5
Wholesale
Electricity
2014
The project is expected to save the town about $300,000 per
year.
Haverhill Solar Power
Project
MA
Haverhill
Brownfield
Private
Solar
1
Wholesale
Electricity
2010
Site serves to conduct load switching with neighboring feeders,
providing National Grid with additional flexibility in serving
customers in this area.
Hill Street Landfill
MA
Norton
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
2
Wholesale
Electricity
2016
Enough energy to power approximately 280 homes in New
England and prevent the annual release of over 2,000 tons of
carbon dioxide from non-renewable power plants. Created 50
construction jobs.
v>EPA
17
Office of Communications, Partnerships, and Analysis
Office of Land and Emergency Management
-------
RE-Powering America's Land Initiative:
Benefits Matrix
February 2018
Through the RE-Powering America's Land initiative, the EPA encourages renewable energy development on potentially contaminated land, landfills, and mine sites when aligned with the community's
vision for the site. Using publicly available information, RE-Powering maintains a list of completed renewable energy installations on contaminated sites and landfills and compiles this information in
its ProiectTrackina Matrix. The followina list tracks benefits associated with completed sites identified and reported bv parties directlv involved with their respective projects (e.a.. information from the
associated city, town, or county; site owners; developers; utilities; and/or financiers) or from other EPA resources. Common benefits reported include revenues from land leases and taxes, electricity cost
savings associated with the reduced need to purchase power from the grid, job creation, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, et al. This resource is for informational purposes only. Please note that
the benefits listed here are not a comprehensive representation of all benefits associated with completed renewable energy projects on contaminated lands and such benefits are calculated in
various ways; nevertheless, this list illustrates the breadth of benefits being realized and highlighted across the country by those developing these types of installations.
Site/Project Name
State
City
Type of
Site
Site
Ownership
Type
RE Type
Project
Capacity
(MW)
Project Type
Completion
Date
Summary of Benefits Identified in
Publicly Available Sources
Energy Savings
Revenue
Environmental
Job Creation
Other
Hull Wind II
MA
Hull
Landfill
Municipal
Wind
1.8
Wholesale
Electricity
2006
Combined, Hull Wind I (not on CL) and Hull Wind II produce
approximately 11% of the town's electricity. Harvard University
purchases 100% of the RECsfor Hull Wind II, equal to about $1.5
million in revenue for Hull.
Hunt Road Landfill
MA
Amesbury
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
6
Wholesale
Electricity
2016
Allowed this unused landfill with little development potential
to produce energy, tax revenue, and local construction jobs.
Provides the city with discounted electricity rates as well as tax
revenues. Produces enough electricity to power approximately
800 New England homes and avoid the release of over 6,000
tons of C02 annually from non-renewable power plants.
Huntington Avenue
Landfill
MA
Metheun
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
1.3
Wholesale
Electricity
2013
Methuen will see nearly $100,000 in energy savings per year
by reducing the town's price per kWh by 40%. Under the terms
of the PPA, Borrego Solar secured financing for the design,
construction, and ongoing maintenance of the solar project,
and will sell the power in the form of energy credits through
National Grid Utility, produced by the project at $0,085 per
kilowatt-hour, roughly $0.06 lower than the current rate.
Indian Orchard Solar
Facility
MA
Springfield
Brownfield
Other
Solar
2.3
Wholesale
Electricity
2011
The project will generate $400,000 in annual property tax
revenue to city of Springfield.
Iron Horse Park / Dow
Solar
MA
Billerica
Superfund
Private
Solar
3.68
Wholesale
Electricity
2016
Will generate energy for four school systems and one local
government through virtual net metering. Will supply an
average of 20% of the offtakers' energy needs.
Kingston Landfill (wind)
MA
Kingston
Landfill
Municipal
Wind
2
Wholesale
Electricity
2012
The project is expected to produce more than 100% of the
electricity consumed by the municipal electric load of the Town
of Kingston.
Lancaster Landfill
MA
Lancaster
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
0.5
Wholesale
Electricity
2013
Energy generated is net metered to offset municipal building
electricity needs, saving the town approximately $75,000
annually
Lee Landfill
MA
Lee
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
2.6
Wholesale
Electricity
2017
20-year PPA provides long-term offtaker of electricity for
developer and long-term energy price assurance for towns
(project serves both Lee and Lenox, MA)
v>EPA
18
Office of Communications, Partnerships, and Analysis
Office of Land and Emergency Management
-------
RE-Powering America's Land Initiative:
Benefits Matrix
February 2018
Through the RE-Powering America's Land initiative, the EPA encourages renewable energy development on potentially contaminated land, landfills, and mine sites when aligned with the community's
vision for the site. Using publicly available information, RE-Powering maintains a list of completed renewable energy installations on contaminated sites and landfills and compiles this information in
its ProiectTrackina Matrix. The followina list tracks benefits associated with completed sites identified and reported bv parties directlv involved with their respective projects (e.a.. information from the
associated city, town, or county; site owners; developers; utilities; and/or financiers) or from other EPA resources. Common benefits reported include revenues from land leases and taxes, electricity cost
savings associated with the reduced need to purchase power from the grid, job creation, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, et al. This resource is for informational purposes only. Please note that
the benefits listed here are not a comprehensive representation of all benefits associated with completed renewable energy projects on contaminated lands and such benefits are calculated in
various ways; nevertheless, this list illustrates the breadth of benefits being realized and highlighted across the country by those developing these types of installations.
Site/Project Name
State
City
Type of
Site
Site
Ownership
Type
RE Type
Project
Capacity
(MW)
Project Type
Completion
Date
Summary of Benefits Identified in
Publicly Available Sources
Energy Savings
Revenue
Environmental
Job Creation
Other
Ludlow Landfill
MA
Ludlow
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
2.7
Wholesale
Electricity
2013
Without a capital expenditure from the city or its taxpayers,
Ludlow can purchase the energy produced by the solar
energy system at a rate of $0.05 per kilowatt-hour, much less
than the $0.09 per kilowatt-hour charged by the local utility.
Depending on the solar system's efficiency, the town of Ludlow
will save approximately $100,000-$ 140,000 a year on energy
bills. Ludlow signed a 20-year contract to lease 17 acres of the
old town landfill. In return for leasing the land, Borrego Solar
secured private funds to finance the engineering, procurement,
construction, and ongoing maintenance and operation costs
associated with the project.
Mashpee Solar
MA
Mashpee
Landfill
Private
Solar
2.1
Wholesale
Electricity
2014
The total anticipated cost savings over the 25-year Power
Purchase Agreement is anticipated at over $7 million.The
system will generate sufficient electricity to offset a large
portion of the electrical needs of the town at a substantial
reduction in cost from current retail electricity rates. It will
generate enough electricity to satisfy the needs of over 300
homes.
Massachusetts Military
Reservation (Otis)
MA
Sagamore
Superfund
Federal
Wind
4.5
Onsite Use - Green
Remediation
2011
The turbines are used to offset electrical costs for powering
numerous groundwater cleanup systems at the site.
Mount Tom Solar
MA
Holyoke
Brownfield
Private
Solar
5.76
Wholesale
Electricity
2017
Enough electricity to power 1,800 homes for a year and reduce
GHG emissions by 3,000 metric tons.
Needham Landfill
MA
Needham
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
3.7
Wholesale
Electricity
2016
Expected to provide first year revenues from net metering
(-$487,000), PILOT (-$93,600), and land lease (-$50,000)
New Bedford High School
Solar
MA
New Bedford
Brownfield
Municipal
Solar
0.5
Wholesale
Electricity
2012
Project will improve science education through the installation
of an interactive digital "kiosk"and other tools so teachers at the
High School and other schools can incorporate the solar project
into their science lessons
North Adams Landfill
MA
North Adams
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
1.5
Wholesale
Electricity
2015
I n total across this installation plus three other solar sites in the
city, North Adams receives nearly 100 % of municipal power
from solar. The landfill installation represents the largest portion
of this (-40%).
v>EPA
19
Office of Communications, Partnerships, and Analysis
Office of Land and Emergency Management
-------
RE-Powering America's Land Initiative:
Benefits Matrix
February 2018
Through the RE-Powering America's Land initiative, the EPA encourages renewable energy development on potentially contaminated land, landfills, and mine sites when aligned with the community's
vision for the site. Using publicly available information, RE-Powering maintains a list of completed renewable energy installations on contaminated sites and landfills and compiles this information in
its ProiectTrackina Matrix. The followina list tracks benefits associated with completed sites identified and reported bv parties directlv involved with their respective projects (e.a.. information from the
associated city, town, or county; site owners; developers; utilities; and/or financiers) or from other EPA resources. Common benefits reported include revenues from land leases and taxes, electricity cost
savings associated with the reduced need to purchase power from the grid, job creation, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, et al. This resource is for informational purposes only. Please note that
the benefits listed here are not a comprehensive representation of all benefits associated with completed renewable energy projects on contaminated lands and such benefits are calculated in
various ways; nevertheless, this list illustrates the breadth of benefits being realized and highlighted across the country by those developing these types of installations.
Site/Project Name
State
City
Type of
Site
Site
Ownership
Type
RE Type
Project
Capacity
(MW)
Project Type
Completion
Date
Summary of Benefits Identified in
Publicly Available Sources
Energy Savings
Revenue
Environmental
Job Creation
Other
Oliver Street Landfill
MA
Easthampton
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
2.3
Wholesale
Electricity
2012
The system was constructed at no cost to city. Borrego leases
land for $1 and sells Easthampton electricity. For the duration
of the 10 year PPAterm, Easthampton will pay $0.06/kWh and
has the option to extend the contract, purchase the solar power
installation, or have it removed at year 11. The reduced cost
per kWh of energy is estimated to save Easthampton over $1.4
million dollars in 10 years.
Osgood Landing Solar
MA
North Andover
State
Brownfield
Private
Solar
6
Wholesale
Electricity
2017
Power purchase agreement includes a 15% discount on
electricity that is estimated to reduce the town's energy bill by
$160,000 in the first year. Town will accumulate over $6M in
energy savings and PILOT revenue over life of the project.
Owens Corning Landfill
MA
Gloucester
Township
Landfill
Private
Solar
3
Wholesale
Electricity
2017
Will bring in $830,000 in revenue for Gloucester Twp. from lease
payments made by Marina Energy.
Palmer Metropolitan
Airfield Solar
MA
Palmer
State
Brownfield
Private
Solar
6
Wholesale
Electricity
2016
Town of Palmer will receive real and personal property tax
revenue of approximately $2 million over the 20-year project
term; three public entities - the Town of Leicester, the Town of
Spencer, and Worcester State University, will together purchase
all of the net metering credits from the energy generated by
the project, resulting in millions of dollars in energy savings for
these entities over the 20-year term of the energy agreements.
Land owner, JenJill LLC of Wil bra ham, Mass., which purchased
the site and paid for its cleanup, will benefit from the long-term
ground lease.
Philips LightolierWind
MA
Fall River
Brownfield
Private
Wind
2
Wholesale
Electricity
2012
Will offset the production of nearly 30,000 tons of carbon
dioxide over the lifetime of the project, supporting the state's
GHG reduction goals; part of Philips Lightolier's plan to create
a net zero energy manufacturing facility (State Government
source)
Pittsfield Municipal
Landfill Solar
MA
Pittsfield
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
2.91
Wholesale
Electricity
2017
Expected to save the city about $140,000 annually in energy
costs.
Prospect Street Landfill
MA
Easton
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
1.9
Wholesale
Electricity
2014
The project will save the town approximately $200,000 annually
and nearly $4,500,000 over the course of the 20-year contract.
The system will produce the equivalent quantity of electricity
consumed by 235 homes in one year.
v>EPA
20
Office of Communications, Partnerships, and Analysis
Office of Land and Emergency Management
-------
RE-Powering America's Land Initiative:
Benefits Matrix
February 2018
Through the RE-Powering America's Land initiative, the EPA encourages renewable energy development on potentially contaminated land, landfills, and mine sites when aligned with the community's
vision for the site. Using publicly available information, RE-Powering maintains a list of completed renewable energy installations on contaminated sites and landfills and compiles this information in
its ProiectTrackina Matrix. The followina list tracks benefits associated with completed sites identified and reported bv parties directlv involved with their respective projects (e.a.. information from the
associated city, town, or county; site owners; developers; utilities; and/or financiers) or from other EPA resources. Common benefits reported include revenues from land leases and taxes, electricity cost
savings associated with the reduced need to purchase power from the grid, job creation, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, et al. This resource is for informational purposes only. Please note that
the benefits listed here are not a comprehensive representation of all benefits associated with completed renewable energy projects on contaminated lands and such benefits are calculated in
various ways; nevertheless, this list illustrates the breadth of benefits being realized and highlighted across the country by those developing these types of installations.
Site/Project Name
State
City
Type of
Site
Site
Ownership
Type
RE Type
Project
Capacity
(MW)
Project Type
Completion
Date
Summary of Benefits Identified in
Publicly Available Sources
Energy Savings
Revenue
Environmental
Job Creation
Other
Quaboag Landfill Solar
MA
Brookfield
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
0.434
Wholesale
Electricity
2013
The installation will earn approximately $800,000 over 20 years
for town through lease payments, PILOT, and reduced electricity
costs. The electricity will power nearly all municipal functions,
including schools, emergency response, street lighting and the
Town Hall.This is equivalent to the total annual electrical usage
of almost 100 average single-family homes.
Randolph Landfill Solar
MA
Randolph
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
4.8
Wholesale
Electricity
2017
Project will provide PILOT revenue of ~$90,000 per year, plus
lease revenues.
Ravenbrook Farms Landfill
Solar
MA
North Carver
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
6
Wholesale
Electricity
2014
Developer negotiated to allow town to collect more than $200k
in back taxes owed via added land lease payments. Town will
also collect tax revenue on installation going forward.
Re-Solve Superfund Solar
MA
Dartmouth
Superfund
Solar
0.15
Onsite Use - Green
Remediation
2012
System to generate 90 percent of electricity for the groundwater
treatment system; about 186,000 KWH/yr.
Revere Solar Power Project
MA
Revere
Brownfield
Private
Solar
0.75
Wholesale
Electricity
2010
Located next to an active substation on Railroad Street that has
encountered loading issues; solar project is designed to help
alleviate this excessive loading.
Rising Paper Solar
MA
Great
Barrington
Brownfield
Private
Solar
3.2
Wholesale
Electricity
2016
Will produce enough clean energy to power the electrical needs
of a local school district and the Town of Great Barrington's
municipal buildings. Net economic benefit of more than
$200,000 in just the first year. Project also allows for the
preservation of wetlands and riverfront buffers on the site.
Russells Mills Road Landfill
MA
Dartmouth
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
1.45
Wholesale
Electricity
2013
The savings generated from the landfill solar energy system are
approximately $3 million over the 20-year life of the PPA term. It
generates tax revenue from the solar project as it is constructed
within the town limits.
Scituate Landfill
MA
Scituate
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
3
Wholesale
Electricity
2013
The system is expected to save town $200,000 per year from
discounted energy rates.TheTown pays Scituate Solar $0,084/
hour ($0.145/hr. to National Grid). Revenue to pay for municipal
building energy costs. City paid nothing up front except
legal fees of approximately $9,000. Project qualified for 1603
Treasury Grant and the SRECI program administered by the
Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources.
v>EPA
21
Office of Communications, Partnerships, and Analysis
Office of Land and Emergency Management
-------
RE-Powering America's Land Initiative:
Benefits Matrix
February 2018
Through the RE-Powering America's Land initiative, the EPA encourages renewable energy development on potentially contaminated land, landfills, and mine sites when aligned with the community's
vision for the site. Using publicly available information, RE-Powering maintains a list of completed renewable energy installations on contaminated sites and landfills and compiles this information in
its ProiectTrackina Matrix. The followina list tracks benefits associated with completed sites identified and reported bv parties directlv involved with their respective projects (e.a.. information from the
associated city, town, or county; site owners; developers; utilities; and/or financiers) or from other EPA resources. Common benefits reported include revenues from land leases and taxes, electricity cost
savings associated with the reduced need to purchase power from the grid, job creation, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, et al. This resource is for informational purposes only. Please note that
the benefits listed here are not a comprehensive representation of all benefits associated with completed renewable energy projects on contaminated lands and such benefits are calculated in
various ways; nevertheless, this list illustrates the breadth of benefits being realized and highlighted across the country by those developing these types of installations.
Site/Project Name
State
City
Type of
Site
Site
Ownership
Type
RE Type
Project
Capacity
(MW)
Project Type
Completion
Date
Summary of Benefits Identified in
Publicly Available Sources
Energy Savings
Revenue
Environmental
Job Creation
Other
Shaffer Landfill (Iron Horse
Park)
MA
Billerica
Superfund
Municipal
Solar
6
Wholesale
Electricity
2014
The installation provides the town with certainty and
predictability with respect to the revenue stream to be
generated from the subject property over its 20 year term. The
facility allows Billerica to reduce dependence on fossil fuels.
Silver Lake Solar
Photovoltaic Facility
MA
Pittsfield
Brownfield
Other
Solar
1.8
Wholesale
Electricity
2010
The installation contributes approximately $220,000 of annual
property tax revenues to the City of Pittsfield.
South Hadley Landfill
MA
South Hadley
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
0.08
Onsite Use -
General
2012
Electricity generated partially offsets electrical consumption
from the adjacent South Hadley Department of Public Works
(-50%).
Stow Brownfield Solar
MA
Stow
Brownfield
Private
Solar
2.5
Wholesale
Electricity
2013
The project pays the town of Stow $12,000 per year as payment
in lieu of taxes, plus the property taxes as determined by the
assessment, an amount that now comes in at a little less than
$8,000 annually for the twelve acres.
Sudbury Landfill Solar
MA
Sudbury
Sudbury
Municipal
Solar
1.5
Wholesale
Electricity
2013
Expected to save the equivalent of 1,310 metric tons of C02 per
year.
Sullivan's Ledge
MA
New Bedford
Superfund
Municipal
Solar
1.8
Wholesale
Electricity
2014
The system is expected to save city $2.7 million over 20
years. Used a local (MA-based) capital firm, BlueWave, for
development.
Theophilus Smith Landfill
MA
Dennis
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
6
Wholesale
Electricity
2014
The Dennis-Yarmouth School District and Dennis Water District
will share approximately $500,000 to 695,000 in annual savings
from installation. The town agrees to purchase the energy at a
reduced rate and sell excess to the Dennis-Yarmouth Regional
School District and the Dennis Water District at a reduced rate.
Clean Focus owns and operates system at no cost to town.
W.R. Grace Solar
MA
Acton/
Concord
Superfund
Municipal
Solar
5.6
Wholesale
Electricity
2016
Will provide the town more than $700,000 in PILOT revenue over
20 years. Offsets approx. 4,503 metric tons of carbon dioxide
per year.
Waltham Street Landfill
MA
Maynard
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
1.2
Wholesale
Electricity
2013
Lease payments $2,500 per MW annually. Electricity generated
by the panels goes into the regional grid; in return the utility
(NSTAR) provides energy credits to the town.
v>EPA
22
Office of Communications, Partnerships, and Analysis
Office of Land and Emergency Management
-------
RE-Powering America's Land Initiative:
Benefits Matrix
February 2018
Through the RE-Powering America's Land initiative, the EPA encourages renewable energy development on potentially contaminated land, landfills, and mine sites when aligned with the community's
vision for the site. Using publicly available information, RE-Powering maintains a list of completed renewable energy installations on contaminated sites and landfills and compiles this information in
its ProiectTrackina Matrix. The followina list tracks benefits associated with completed sites identified and reported bv parties directlv involved with their respective projects (e.a.. information from the
associated city, town, or county; site owners; developers; utilities; and/or financiers) or from other EPA resources. Common benefits reported include revenues from land leases and taxes, electricity cost
savings associated with the reduced need to purchase power from the grid, job creation, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, et al. This resource is for informational purposes only. Please note that
the benefits listed here are not a comprehensive representation of all benefits associated with completed renewable energy projects on contaminated lands and such benefits are calculated in
various ways; nevertheless, this list illustrates the breadth of benefits being realized and highlighted across the country by those developing these types of installations.
Site/Project Name
State
City
Type of
Site
Site
Ownership
Type
RE Type
Project
Capacity
(MW)
Project Type
Completion
Date
Summary of Benefits Identified in
Publicly Available Sources
Energy Savings
Revenue
Environmental
Job Creation
Other
West Boylston Landfill
MA
West Boylston
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
1.5
Wholesale
Electricity
2016
Net savings of about $1.8 million for the community over the life
of the array
West Tisbury Landfill
MA
West Tisbury
MSW
Landfill
Private
Solar
0.884
Wholesale
Electricity
2015
10-year PPA with extension options provides long-term energy
cost assurance and savings for the town of up to $45,000 over
the first 10 years of the PPA.
Westfield Landfill
MA
Westfield
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
2.5
Wholesale
Electricity
2015
The city receives benefits from lease payments, payment
in lieu of taxes (PILOT), and operational savings. The power
is purchased by the Municipal Light Board, which provides
electricity to municipal facilities at a reduced rate.
Westford St. Landfill
MA
Lowell
Landfill
Private
Solar
1.5
Wholesale
Electricity
2014
The city is expected to save $1,5-$2.5 million a year, installed at
no upfront cost to the city.
Weston Landfill
MA
Weston
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
2.27
Wholesale
Electricity
2016
Town will receive 1 net metering credit for each kilowatt-hour
of electricity generated by the solar array and received by
Eversource (Nstar) over the course of the 20 year lease. These
credits are applied to the electric bill received by the Town,
thereby reducing how much money is spent on electricity used
by the municipality and saving tax dollars.
Woburn Landfill
MA
Woburn
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
3.4
Wholesale
Electricity
2017
Expected to generate more than $370,000 a year in savings for
the city.
MD-MARYLAND
Former Ellicott City
Landfill
MD
Ellicott City
Landfill
Private
Solar
1.2
Wholesale
Electricity
2011
Provides ~90% of the annual electricity needs of
Worthington Elementary School; SunEdison provided solar
curricula for the Howard County Board of Education to use
during classroom discussions of environmental sustainability
and renewable energy
Fort Detrick
MD
Frederick
SUperfund
Federal
Solar
18.6
Onsite Use -
General
2016
Expected to provide nearly $3 million in cost avoidance over the
duration of the 25-year electricity purchase agreement the Army
has with the project's private developer and owner.
v>EPA
23
Office of Communications, Partnerships, and Analysis
Office of Land and Emergency Management
-------
RE-Powering America's Land Initiative:
Benefits Matrix
February 2018
Through the RE-Powering America's Land initiative, the EPA encourages renewable energy development on potentially contaminated land, landfills, and mine sites when aligned with the community's
vision for the site. Using publicly available information, RE-Powering maintains a list of completed renewable energy installations on contaminated sites and landfills and compiles this information in
its ProiectTrackina Matrix. The followina list tracks benefits associated with completed sites identified and reported bv parties directlv involved with their respective projects (e.a.. information from the
associated city, town, or county; site owners; developers; utilities; and/or financiers) or from other EPA resources. Common benefits reported include revenues from land leases and taxes, electricity cost
savings associated with the reduced need to purchase power from the grid, job creation, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, et al. This resource is for informational purposes only. Please note that
the benefits listed here are not a comprehensive representation of all benefits associated with completed renewable energy projects on contaminated lands and such benefits are calculated in
various ways; nevertheless, this list illustrates the breadth of benefits being realized and highlighted across the country by those developing these types of installations.
Site/Project Name
State
City
Type of
Site
Site
Ownership
Type
RE Type
Project
Capacity
(MW)
Project Type
Completion
Date
Summary of Benefits Identified in
Publicly Available Sources
Energy Savings
Revenue
Environmental
Job Creation
Other
Forty West Landfill
MD
Hagerstown
Landfill
Private
Solar
2
Wholesale
Electricity
2015
Across all EPG Solar installations (including 2 non-CL projects),
the County will receive more than $375,000 a year in rent and
revenue with an estimated $100,000 in energy cost savings. (For
ALL sites in the plan, not just Forty West Landfill.)
Washington County
Rubble Landfill
MD
Williamsport
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
2.5
Wholesale
Electricity
2015
The county will receive more than $375,000 a year in rent and
revenue with an estimated $100,000 in energy cost savings. (For
ALL sites in the plan, not just Rubble Landfill.)
ME-MAINE
Belfast Landfill
ME
Belfast
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
0.122
Wholesale
Electricity
2015
The system provides nearly 20% of the electricity load for the
city's 11 municipal buildings. It is expected to generate $21,000
a year and pay for itself within 15 years.
MN - MINNESOTA
Fridley Plant Solar
MN
N/A
Superfund
Private
Solar
0.147
Onsite Use - Green
Remediation
2009
Solar panels provide 30 percent of the electrical energy needed
for the remediation system on the southern side of the site. The
amount of energy produced per year would supply enough
power for four average-sized homes. The use of solar energy at
the site reduces carbon dioxide equivalent emissions by 41,000
pounds per year.
Hutchinson Landfill
MN
Hutchinson
Landfill
Private
Solar
0.4
Onsite Use -
General
2015
Used local companies for the installation (tenKSolar, Bloomington-
based solar company who supplied the hardware and 975 panels
and Hunt Electric - the contractor that installed the panels).
Generates 15% of power needed for WWTP (next door).
MO-MISSOURI
Busy Bee's Laundry
MO
Rolla
Brownfield
Private
Solar
0.56
Onsite Use - Green
Remediation
2011
System installed to produce electricity needed for operating
one400-watt surface-mounted piston pump. Extracted more
than 1,800 gallon of groundwater during the first four weeks of
operation, at an average rate of 100-160 gallons per day, for ex
situ treatment. The PV system is supplying an energy quantity
within the range predicted in the project design phase.
v>EPA
24
Office of Communications, Partnerships, and Analysis
Office of Land and Emergency Management
-------
RE-Powering America's Land Initiative:
Benefits Matrix
February 2018
Through the RE-Powering America's Land initiative, the EPA encourages renewable energy development on potentially contaminated land, landfills, and mine sites when aligned with the community's
vision for the site. Using publicly available information, RE-Powering maintains a list of completed renewable energy installations on contaminated sites and landfills and compiles this information in
its ProiectTrackina Matrix. The followina list tracks benefits associated with completed sites identified and reported bv parties directlv involved with their respective projects (e.a.. information from the
associated city, town, or county; site owners; developers; utilities; and/or financiers) or from other EPA resources. Common benefits reported include revenues from land leases and taxes, electricity cost
savings associated with the reduced need to purchase power from the grid, job creation, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, et al. This resource is for informational purposes only. Please note that
the benefits listed here are not a comprehensive representation of all benefits associated with completed renewable energy projects on contaminated lands and such benefits are calculated in
various ways; nevertheless, this list illustrates the breadth of benefits being realized and highlighted across the country by those developing these types of installations.
Site/Project Name
State
City
Type of
Site
Site
Ownership
Type
RE Type
Project
Capacity
(MW)
Project Type
Completion
Date
Summary of Benefits Identified in
Publicly Available Sources
Energy Savings
Revenue
Environmental
Job Creation
Other
MT-MONTANA
Zortman-Landusky Mine
MT
N/A
Mine Lands
Federal/
Municipal
Wind
0.225
Onsite Use - Green
Remediation
2012
Wind turbine offsets some of the $300,000 in annual power
costs for long-term water treatment and monitoring at the site.
NC-NORTH CAROLINA
Evergreen Packaging
Landfill
NC
Haywood
County
Landfill
Private
Solar
0.55
Wholesale
Electricity
2010
Developer savings on land lease via 20-year agreement at $1/
year.
NE-NEBRASKA
Former Nebraska
Ordnance Plant
NE
Mead
Superfund
Private
Wind
0.01
Onsite Use - Green
Remediation
2004
Wind turbine provides sufficient renewable energy for
continued trichloroethene removal and explosives destruction
by the aboveground treatment system during grid inter-tie
operation. Provides electricity cost savings expected to total
more than $40,000 over the next 15 years of treatment, based
on an electricity rate of $0.0546/kWh at the time of wind
turbine startup. Reduces consumption of utility electricity
by 26%. Decreases C02 emissions by 24-32% during off-grid
operation of the system's 230-volt submersible pump. Returns
surplus electricity to the grid for other consumer use. Provides
educational opportunities for Missouri University of Science and
Technology students evaluating renewable energy, remediation,
and electronic system technologies.
NH- NEW HAMPSHIRE
Milton Landfill Solar
Garden
NH
Milton
MSW
Landfill
Private
Solar
1
Wholesale
Electricity
2016
Community solar model allows those who can't otherwise install
solar to have access to solar energy; town has signed PPA, which
provides energy cost savings.
NJ- NEW JERSEY
Bernards Township
Landfill
NJ
Bernards
Township
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
3.68
Wholesale
Electricity
2016
Will generate more than $500,000 in revenue for the town via
land lease and energy cost savings
BrickTownship Landfill
NJ
BrickTownship
Superfund
Municipal
Solar
7
Wholesale
Electricity
2014
The township estimates that the solar array will save about $13
million through discounted energy prices over the course of
15 years.
v>EPA
25
Office of Communications, Partnerships, and Analysis
Office of Land and Emergency Management
-------
RE-Powering America's Land Initiative:
Benefits Matrix
February 2018
Through the RE-Powering America's Land initiative, the EPA encourages renewable energy development on potentially contaminated land, landfills, and mine sites when aligned with the community's
vision for the site. Using publicly available information, RE-Powering maintains a list of completed renewable energy installations on contaminated sites and landfills and compiles this information in
its ProiectTrackina Matrix. The followina list tracks benefits associated with completed sites identified and reported bv parties directlv involved with their respective projects (e.a.. information from the
associated city, town, or county; site owners; developers; utilities; and/or financiers) or from other EPA resources. Common benefits reported include revenues from land leases and taxes, electricity cost
savings associated with the reduced need to purchase power from the grid, job creation, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, et al. This resource is for informational purposes only. Please note that
the benefits listed here are not a comprehensive representation of all benefits associated with completed renewable energy projects on contaminated lands and such benefits are calculated in
various ways; nevertheless, this list illustrates the breadth of benefits being realized and highlighted across the country by those developing these types of installations.
Site/Project Name
State
City
Type of
Site
Site
Ownership
Type
RE Type
Project
Capacity
(MW)
Project Type
Completion
Date
Summary of Benefits Identified in
Publicly Available Sources
Energy Savings
Revenue
Environmental
Job Creation
Other
Clean Harbors
NJ
Bridgeport
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
1.5
Onsite Use - Green
Remediation
2011
The system reduces the $250,000 annual electric bill for cleanup
by 90%.The revenue from the solar installation will fund
continued groundwater treatment.
FedEx Ground Distribution
Hub
NJ
Woodbridge
Brownfield
Private
Solar
2.42
Wholesale
Electricity
2009
Generates 30% of the hub's electricity needs; annual reduction
of approximately 1,867 metric tons of C02 emissions
Fort Dix Solar
NJ
Pemberton
Township
Landfill
Federal
Solar
16.5
Wholesale
Electricity
2017
Will produce enough energy to power 1,500 homes, avoiding
more than 15,000 metric tons of C02 emissions-the equivalent
of removing 3,000 cars from the road.
HackensackSolar Farm
NJ
Hackensack
Brownfield
Other
Solar
1.06
Wholesale
Electricity
2012
Created construction and permanent jobs (number not
specified).
Industrial Land Reclaiming
Landfill
NJ
Edison
MSW
Landfill
Private
Solar
21
Wholesale
Electricity
2017
Adds to state's renewable energy resources without reducing
the state's open space
Kinsley Landfill
NJ
Deptford
Township
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
11.18
Wholesale
Electricity
2014
PSE&G's largest solar project to date; transformed 35 acres of
unused landfill into solar field
L&D Landfill
NJ
Eastampton,
Lumberton,
Mount Holly
Landfill
Private
Solar
12.93
Wholesale
Electricity
2016
The system created 190 construction jobs. It also generates
enough electricity to power 2,000 average NJ homes annually.
Linden Solar Farm
NJ
Linden
Brownfield
Other
Solar
3.2
Wholesale
Electricity
2011
Created construction and permanent jobs (number not
specified).
Parklands Solar Farm
NJ
Bordentown
Township
Landfill
Private
Solar
10.4
Wholesale
Electricity
2015
PSE&G estimates that at the height of construction, there
were approximately 100 people onsite working on the project
in a range of jobs, including electricians, engineers, heavy
equipment operators, ironworkers, laborers, and truck drivers.
Paulsboro Terminal
Landfill
NJ
Paulsboro
Brownfield
Private
Solar
0.276
Onsite Use - Green
Remediation
2002
Solar to generate 350,000 kWh/year and will power
approximately 30% of demand for remediation of the terminal.
Avoids 571,000 pounds of C02 gases per year.
Pennsauken Landfill
Renewable Energy Park-
Solar
NJ
Pennsauken
Landfill
Other
Solar
2.6
Onsite Use -
General
2008
All power from the installation sold to Aluminum Shapes
aluminum company.
v>EPA
26
Office of Communications, Partnerships, and Analysis
Office of Land and Emergency Management
-------
RE-Powering America's Land Initiative:
Benefits Matrix
February 2018
Through the RE-Powering America's Land initiative, the EPA encourages renewable energy development on potentially contaminated land, landfills, and mine sites when aligned with the community's
vision for the site. Using publicly available information, RE-Powering maintains a list of completed renewable energy installations on contaminated sites and landfills and compiles this information in
its ProiectTrackina Matrix. The followina list tracks benefits associated with completed sites identified and reported bv parties directlv involved with their respective projects (e.a.. information from the
associated city, town, or county; site owners; developers; utilities; and/or financiers) or from other EPA resources. Common benefits reported include revenues from land leases and taxes, electricity cost
savings associated with the reduced need to purchase power from the grid, job creation, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, et al. This resource is for informational purposes only. Please note that
the benefits listed here are not a comprehensive representation of all benefits associated with completed renewable energy projects on contaminated lands and such benefits are calculated in
various ways; nevertheless, this list illustrates the breadth of benefits being realized and highlighted across the country by those developing these types of installations.
Site/Project Name
State
City
Type of
Site
Site
Ownership
Type
RE Type
Project
Capacity
(MW)
Project Type
Completion
Date
Summary of Benefits Identified in
Publicly Available Sources
Energy Savings
Revenue
Environmental
Job Creation
Other
Silver Lake Solar Farm
NJ
Edison
Brownfield
Private
Solar
2.02
Wholesale
Electricity
2010
PSE&G used a NJ contractor to build Silver Lake Solar Farm.
Tinton Falls Solar
NJ
Tinton Falls
Mine Lands
Private
Solar
20
Wholesale
Electricity
2013
Provided "hundreds" of highly skilled union and professional
jobs during construction.
Trenton Solar Farm
NJ
Trenton
Brownfield
Other
Solar
1.3
Wholesale
Electricity
2010
Creation of green jobs.
NM-NEW MEXICO
Chevron Questa
NM
Questa
Superfund
Private
Solar
1
Wholesale
Electricity
2011
The village of Questa has seen economic benefits from the
project. Chevron worked with several local companies, adding
close to $3 million to the local economy and an additional $2.5
million with other contractors in the New Mexico area.
Emcore Eubank Landfill
NM
Albuquerque
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
2
On-site Use -
General
2013
Project development employed up to 16 engineers at various
stages, over a dozen electrical contractors, and over 30
construction workers, laborers, equipment operators and truck
drivers. Additional contractors included UL Engineers and
Inspectors, and labor for fencing/signs and electrical enclosures
made locally. The solar farm which will supply approximately 20
percent of the power requirements for EMCORE's Albuquerque
facilities.
NV-NEVADA
Nellis Air Force Base
NV
Las Vegas
RCRA
Federal
Solar
14.2
Onsite Use -
General
2007
The system saves the USAF an estimated $1 million annually.
Nellis Solar Array II
Generating Station
NV
Las Vegas
RCRA
Federal
Solar
15
Onsite Use -
General
2016
Created ~150 jobs for site installation and NV Energy upgrades;
new substation and distribution lines help provide system
redundancy and protect AFB against power vulnerabilities;
expected to provide emissions reductions of27,000 tons annually.
v>EPA
27
Office of Communications, Partnerships, and Analysis
Office of Land and Emergency Management
-------
RE-Powering America's Land Initiative:
Benefits Matrix
February 2018
Through the RE-Powering America's Land initiative, the EPA encourages renewable energy development on potentially contaminated land, landfills, and mine sites when aligned with the community's
vision for the site. Using publicly available information, RE-Powering maintains a list of completed renewable energy installations on contaminated sites and landfills and compiles this information in
its ProiectTrackina Matrix. The followina list tracks benefits associated with completed sites identified and reported bv parties directlv involved with their respective projects (e.a.. information from the
associated city, town, or county; site owners; developers; utilities; and/or financiers) or from other EPA resources. Common benefits reported include revenues from land leases and taxes, electricity cost
savings associated with the reduced need to purchase power from the grid, job creation, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, et al. This resource is for informational purposes only. Please note that
the benefits listed here are not a comprehensive representation of all benefits associated with completed renewable energy projects on contaminated lands and such benefits are calculated in
various ways; nevertheless, this list illustrates the breadth of benefits being realized and highlighted across the country by those developing these types of installations.
Site/Project Name
State
City
Type of
Site
Site
Ownership
Type
RE Type
Project
Capacity
(MW)
Project Type
Completion
Date
Summary of Benefits Identified in
Publicly Available Sources
Energy Savings
Revenue
Environmental
Job Creation
Other
NY-NEW YORK
Bethlehem Steel
Winds (combined, two
installations)
NY
Hamburg /
Lackawanna
RCRA
Private
Wind
35
Wholesale
Electricity
2007/2012
The project created approximately $190,000 in annual tax
revenues for local communities and school districts. Created five
permanent green jobs and 140 construction jobs in an area with
high unemployment.
Clifton Park Solar
NY
Clifton Park
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
1
Wholesale
Electricity
2017
Energy generated is estimated to be the equivalent of 90% of
the town's energy usage.Town will realize savings via remote
net metering credits for this generation.
Former Ferdula Landfill
NY
Frankfurt
Landfill
Wind
Onsite Use - Green
Remediation
1998
Avoids air emissions associated with consumption of
grid electricity during soil treatment. Capitalizes on wind
intermittency to provide the pulsed effect that is typically
effective in venting operations. Recovered $14,000 in capital/
installation costs for the wind system within one year due to
avoided electricity. Accrues annual O&M costs below $500,
in contrast to potential $75,000 for a conventional soil vapor
extraction (SVE) system.
Hoosick Falls Landfill Solar
Garden
NY
Village of
Hoosick Falls
Landfill
Private
Solar
0.592
Wholesale
Electricity
2015
In conjunction with the other structure-mounted installations
on village-owned buildings, installation will save the Village
$40,000 in the first full year of operation, and over $1,300,000
over 20 years.
Islip Municipal Town
Landfill
NY
Hauppauge
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
0.05
Wholesale
Electricity
2011
Used an estimated 30 skilled craftsman on the job. Solar panels
are "Buy America Act" qualified
Long Island Solar Farm
at Brookhaven National
Laboratory
NY
Upton
Superfund
Federal
Solar
32
Wholesale
Electricity
2011
Created 200 plus full time equivalent jobs during construction,
2 full-time operational jobs.The system also provides price
stability for electricity customers of Long Island Public Authority.
Madison County
Agriculture and
Renewable Energy Park
NY
Lincoln
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
0.05
Onsite Use -
General
2011
Produces enough energy to offset 50% of the material recycling
facility demand. Low cost land. Improvements are taxable and
jobs were created. Any excess-electricity generated through the
solar modules will be net-metered to the grid.
v>EPA
28
Office of Communications, Partnerships, and Analysis
Office of Land and Emergency Management
-------
RE-Powering America's Land Initiative:
Benefits Matrix
February 2018
Through the RE-Powering America's Land initiative, the EPA encourages renewable energy development on potentially contaminated land, landfills, and mine sites when aligned with the community's
vision for the site. Using publicly available information, RE-Powering maintains a list of completed renewable energy installations on contaminated sites and landfills and compiles this information in
its ProiectTrackina Matrix. The followina list tracks benefits associated with completed sites identified and reported bv parties directlv involved with their respective projects (e.a.. information from the
associated city, town, or county; site owners; developers; utilities; and/or financiers) or from other EPA resources. Common benefits reported include revenues from land leases and taxes, electricity cost
savings associated with the reduced need to purchase power from the grid, job creation, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, et al. This resource is for informational purposes only. Please note that
the benefits listed here are not a comprehensive representation of all benefits associated with completed renewable energy projects on contaminated lands and such benefits are calculated in
various ways; nevertheless, this list illustrates the breadth of benefits being realized and highlighted across the country by those developing these types of installations.
Site/Project Name
State
City
Type of
Site
Site
Ownership
Type
RE Type
Project
Capacity
(MW)
Project Type
Completion
Date
Summary of Benefits Identified in
Publicly Available Sources
Energy Savings
Revenue
Environmental
Job Creation
Other
Olean Gateway "Solean"
NY
Olean
State
Brownfield
Private
Solar
4
Wholesale
Electricity
2017
Through arrangement with National Grid and Olean Gateway
LLC, St. Bonaventure University will save an estimated $100,000
or more a year on its electric bill based on credits from the solar
installation. The solar will also reduce the university's carbon
footprint.
Weibel Ave. Landfill
NY
Saratoga
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
4.2
Wholesale
Electricity
2017
Expected to generate 40% of city's overall electricity needs and
to avoid emissions of approximately 1,605 metric tons of C02.
West Nyack Landfill
NY
Clarkstown
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
2.634
Wholesale
Electricity
2014
The town expects to save about $4M over life of system
(30 years).
West Park Landfill (Floyd
Ackert Rd.)
NY
Esopus
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
0.6
Wholesale
Electricity
2017
Project will generate revenue by selling net metering credits.
Williamson Landfill
NY
Williamson
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
1.5
Wholesale
Electricity
2014
The system is expected to generate enough power for all town
facilities. The town anticipates $27,000 in savings in 2015 and up
to $1.5 million in savings over the course of 25 years.
OH-OHIO
Cuyahoga Metropolitan
Housing Authority
OH
Cleveland
Brownfield
Municipal
Solar
1.1
Wholesale
Electricity
2013
Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority will save several
million dollars over the life of the solar panels.
Dayton Tech Town
OH
Dayton
Brownfield
Geothermal
Onsite Use -
General
2010
Expected annual savings are over $66,000 and 300,000 kwH/
year related to sustainable building and geothermal system
combined.
Medical Center Company
Solar
OH
Cleveland
Brownfield
Solar
1.5
Wholesale
Electricity
2014
Partnered with Case Western Reserve University's Solar
Durability and Lifetime Extension research Center to assist with
their research and data collection goals.
Pilkington North America
OH
Northwood
Brownfield
Private
Solar
0.25
On-site Use -
General
2011
Solar array supplies approximately 12% of the R&D center's
power requirements. A feasibility study determined a 2MW
system would be built in phases to maximize funding stream
and lessen the financial burden through the sale of RECs.
Toledo Zoo
OH
Toledo
Brownfield
Private
Solar
2.1
Onsite Use -
General
2014
The zoo estimates energy savings to be in the range of
$200,000. Installation provides power to Toledo Zoo (about 30%
of zoo's total electricity needs).
v>EPA
29
Office of Communications, Partnerships, and Analysis
Office of Land and Emergency Management
-------
RE-Powering America's Land Initiative:
Benefits Matrix
February 2018
Through the RE-Powering America's Land initiative, the EPA encourages renewable energy development on potentially contaminated land, landfills, and mine sites when aligned with the community's
vision for the site. Using publicly available information, RE-Powering maintains a list of completed renewable energy installations on contaminated sites and landfills and compiles this information in
its ProiectTrackina Matrix. The followina list tracks benefits associated with completed sites identified and reported bv parties directlv involved with their respective projects (e.a.. information from the
associated city, town, or county; site owners; developers; utilities; and/or financiers) or from other EPA resources. Common benefits reported include revenues from land leases and taxes, electricity cost
savings associated with the reduced need to purchase power from the grid, job creation, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, et al. This resource is for informational purposes only. Please note that
the benefits listed here are not a comprehensive representation of all benefits associated with completed renewable energy projects on contaminated lands and such benefits are calculated in
various ways; nevertheless, this list illustrates the breadth of benefits being realized and highlighted across the country by those developing these types of installations.
Site/Project Name
State
City
Type of
Site
Site
Ownership
Type
RE Type
Project
Capacity
(MW)
Project Type
Completion
Date
Summary of Benefits Identified in
Publicly Available Sources
Energy Savings
Revenue
Environmental
Job Creation
Other
Wood County Landfill
OH
Bowling Green
Landfill
Municipal
Wind
7.2
Wholesale
Electricity
2004
The system supports municipal utility and reduces the amount
of power they have to purchase from other generators; provides
enough electricity to power ~2,500 residential customers.
OK-OKLAHOMA
Altus Air Force Base
OK
Altus
RCRA
Federal
Solar
0.0002
Onsite Use - Green
Remediation
2007
Relying on an off-grid, 200-watt PV array to power a submersible
pump used for recirculation of water through the bioreactor.
During initial operations (2003-2005), the system recirculated
groundwater at a rate ranging from approximately 600 to
1,650 gallons per day (gpd), at an average of 922 gpd. Use of
the onsite solar energy also avoided significant consumption
of materials and other resources (including project funds)
otherwise needed to connect to the electricity grid.
Guthrie Green
OK
Tulsa
Brownfield
Foundation
Geothermal
w/solar
Onsite Use -
General
2012
A geothermal exchange well field circulates water that feeds
ground source heat pumps in the neighboring Tulsa Paper
Company building and the Hardesty Visual Arts Center, reducing
their heating and cooling costs by approximately 60%. Using
the innovative Rygan technology, the well field has a capacity of
600 tons of heating and cooling.
PA-PENNSYLVANIA
Casselman Wind Power
Project
PA
Traverses
Summit, Black,
and Addison
Mine Lands
Private
Wind
35
Wholesale
Electricity
2008
Expected to generate approximately $245,000 in direct
economic benefit to region annually, through combo of taxes,
easement payments, and direct landowner payments. Up to 150
construction jobs created.
Frey Farm Landfill
PA
Conestoga
Landfill
Municipal
Wind
3.2
Wholesale
Electricity
2011
Turbines provide 21-25% of power needs for nearby Turkey Hill
Dairy (enough to make five million gallons of ice cream). Will
reduce the dairy's annua I greenhouse gas emissions by roughly
5,900 tons, the equivalent of ~1,000 cars, or decreasing demand
for foreign oil by 12,000 barrels. Turbines provide energy
diversification and reduced electrical costs.
Highland North Wind Farm
PA
Cambria
County
Mine Lands
Private
Wind
75
Wholesale
Electricity
2012
Approximately $5.5 million in tax revenue to the state, local
townships and Forest Hills School District over the life of the
project; over $3 million in local goods and services for operation
and maintenance over the life of the project.
v>EPA
30
Office of Communications, Partnerships, and Analysis
Office of Land and Emergency Management
-------
RE-Powering America's Land Initiative:
Benefits Matrix
February 2018
Through the RE-Powering America's Land initiative, the EPA encourages renewable energy development on potentially contaminated land, landfills, and mine sites when aligned with the community's
vision for the site. Using publicly available information, RE-Powering maintains a list of completed renewable energy installations on contaminated sites and landfills and compiles this information in
its ProiectTrackina Matrix. The followina list tracks benefits associated with completed sites identified and reported bv parties directlv involved with their respective projects (e.a.. information from the
associated city, town, or county; site owners; developers; utilities; and/or financiers) or from other EPA resources. Common benefits reported include revenues from land leases and taxes, electricity cost
savings associated with the reduced need to purchase power from the grid, job creation, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, et al. This resource is for informational purposes only. Please note that
the benefits listed here are not a comprehensive representation of all benefits associated with completed renewable energy projects on contaminated lands and such benefits are calculated in
various ways; nevertheless, this list illustrates the breadth of benefits being realized and highlighted across the country by those developing these types of installations.
Site/Project Name
State
City
Type of
Site
Site
Ownership
Type
RE Type
Project
Capacity
(MW)
Project Type
Completion
Date
Summary of Benefits Identified in
Publicly Available Sources
Energy Savings
Revenue
Environmental
Job Creation
Other
Highland Wind Farm
PA
Cambria
County
Mine Lands
Private
Wind
62.5
Wholesale
Electricity
2009
The system will generate approximately $4 million in local
goods and services for operation and maintenance over the life
of the project. Creates $4.5 million in tax revenue to state, local
townships and school districts over the life of the project and 9
full-time O&M staff.
York County Landfill Solar
PA
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
0.3
Onsite Use - Green
Remediation
2014
The system generates about 300,000 kWh of electricity each
year and reduces the facility's dependence on fossil fuels.
Generates power for the site's general energy needs, including
ongoing management of groundwater treatment systems and
office buildings.
Rl- RHODE ISLAND
East Providence Landfill
Solar Farm
Rl
East
Providence
RCRA
Municipal
Solar
2.25
Wholesale
Electricity
2014
City leases land for $40,000 per year for 18 acres (installation
may be expanded in the future). Property tax to city is $30,600
per year, based on the 20% of full valuation of tangible
equipment per the corresponding PILOT agreement.
SC-SOUTH CAROLINA
Savannah River's Biomass
Steam Plant
SC
Hopewell
Township
Superfund
Federal
Biomass
20
Onsite Use -
General
2008
Energy savings of more than $34.4 million annually. Created
more than 27 full-time jobs on-site, with over 600,000 hours of
construction and operational labor in construction period (30
months).
TN-TENNESSEE
Bristol Demolition Landfill
TN
Hermitage
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
0.2
Wholesale
Electricity
2012
The city leases the land for $6,000 annually and sells the
electricity generated at the landfill sitetoTVA via the local
energy provider, Bristol Tennessee Essential Services (BTES), for
$0.21/kWh.The contract specifies a twelve-and-a-half-year term
of use with another twelve-and-a-half-year extension. After the
initial term of the agreement, the rate will go down to $0.01/
kWh, but the $6,000 annual lease fee will stay the same. The
city receives about 10 percent of the revenue generated from
the system and EES gets 90 percent. This system will produce
approximately 300,000 kW of solar electricity annually with
a lifetime guarantee of 30 years.The array provides enough
electricity to power about fifty homes in the area and offsets
over 6,000 tons of carbon dioxide annually.
v>EPA
31
Office of Communications, Partnerships, and Analysis
Office of Land and Emergency Management
-------
RE-Powering America's Land Initiative:
Benefits Matrix
February 2018
Through the RE-Powering America's Land initiative, the EPA encourages renewable energy development on potentially contaminated land, landfills, and mine sites when aligned with the community's
vision for the site. Using publicly available information, RE-Powering maintains a list of completed renewable energy installations on contaminated sites and landfills and compiles this information in
its ProiectTrackina Matrix. The followina list tracks benefits associated with completed sites identified and reported bv parties directlv involved with their respective projects (e.a.. information from the
associated city, town, or county; site owners; developers; utilities; and/or financiers) or from other EPA resources. Common benefits reported include revenues from land leases and taxes, electricity cost
savings associated with the reduced need to purchase power from the grid, job creation, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, et al. This resource is for informational purposes only. Please note that
the benefits listed here are not a comprehensive representation of all benefits associated with completed renewable energy projects on contaminated lands and such benefits are calculated in
various ways; nevertheless, this list illustrates the breadth of benefits being realized and highlighted across the country by those developing these types of installations.
Site/Project Name
State
City
Type of
Site
Site
Ownership
Type
RE Type
Project
Capacity
(MW)
Project Type
Completion
Date
Summary of Benefits Identified in
Publicly Available Sources
Energy Savings
Revenue
Environmental
Job Creation
Other
RSI Brightfields One
TN
Bristol
Brownfield
Private
Solar
0.2
Wholesale
Electricity
2012
UsedTN-produced solar panels.
Volkswagen Chattanooga
TN
Chattanooga
RCRA
Private
Solar
9.5
Wholesale
Electricity
2013
Expected to meet 12.5% of the energy needs of Volkswagen's
Chattanooga manufacturing plant during full production and
100% during non-production periods. Equivalent to avoiding
C02 emissions of nearly 2,000 passenger vehicles per year, or the
equivalent amount of electricity needed to power nearly more
than 1,000 average American homes annually.
TX - TEXAS
Central Texas Veterans
Landfill Solar
TX
Temple
Landfill
Federal
Solar
2.94
Wholesale
Electricity
2012
Installation saves the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
$300,000 per year in energy costs
Grove Landfill
TX
Austin
Landfill
Solar
Onsite Use - Green
Remediation
2006
Avoided installation of utility lines and associated air emissions
from construction equipment (and additional consumption
of grid-supplied electricity) by using the PV energy system
wherever possible.
Pantex Renewable Energy
Project (PREP)
TX
Amarillo
Superfund
Federal
Wind
11.5
Wholesale
Electricity
2014
An estimated $2.8 million annual energy savings for DOE.
Tessman Road Municipal
Solid Waste Landfill
TX
San Antonio
Landfill
Private
Solar
0.13
Wholesale
Electricity
2009
Site uses a flexible solar cover. Republic and CPS Energy will
study and document the results of this installation for use in
the deployment of solar energy covers on owned landfills
throughout the region.
UT-UTAH
Salt Lake City Landfill
UT
Salt Lake City
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
1
Wholesale
Electricity
2015
Combined with a solar installation on its roof, landfill solar
allows city public safety building to achieve net zero energy.
VA-VIRGINIA
Crozet Orchard
VA
Crozet
Superfund
Private
Solar
Onsite Use - Green
Remediation
2007
Avoids costs and greenhouse gas emissions associated with
consumption of grid electricity during the treatment process.
v>EPA
32
Office of Communications, Partnerships, and Analysis
Office of Land and Emergency Management
-------
RE-Powering America's Land Initiative:
Benefits Matrix
February 2018
Through the RE-Powering America's Land initiative, the EPA encourages renewable energy development on potentially contaminated land, landfills, and mine sites when aligned with the community's
vision for the site. Using publicly available information, RE-Powering maintains a list of completed renewable energy installations on contaminated sites and landfills and compiles this information in
its ProiectTrackina Matrix. The followina list tracks benefits associated with completed sites identified and reported bv parties directlv involved with their respective projects (e.a.. information from the
associated city, town, or county; site owners; developers; utilities; and/or financiers) or from other EPA resources. Common benefits reported include revenues from land leases and taxes, electricity cost
savings associated with the reduced need to purchase power from the grid, job creation, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, et al. This resource is for informational purposes only. Please note that
the benefits listed here are not a comprehensive representation of all benefits associated with completed renewable energy projects on contaminated lands and such benefits are calculated in
various ways; nevertheless, this list illustrates the breadth of benefits being realized and highlighted across the country by those developing these types of installations.
Site/Project Name
State
City
Type of
Site
Site
Ownership
Type
RE Type
Project
Capacity
(MW)
Project Type
Completion
Date
Summary of Benefits Identified in
Publicly Available Sources
Energy Savings
Reven ue
Environmental
Job Creation
Other
VI-VIRGIN ISLANDS
Former St. Croix Alumina
Plant
VI
St Croix
RCRA
Wind, Solar
0
Onsite Use - Green
Remediation
2002
2003
2006
Wind-driven turbine compressors drive compressed air into
hydraulic skimming pumps. Solar PV powers some recovery
wells. These systems avoid air emissions associated with
consumption of grid electricity during petroleum recovery.
VT-VERMONT
Elizabeth Mine Solar
VT
Stafford
Superfund
Private
Solar
7
Wholesale
Electricity
2017
Developer used local civil, mechanical, and electrical
contractors for the project, driving employment for local
economies during installation. Grid upgrades completed
during construction benefited the community with an
improved electrical system that upgraded the reliability of the
entire system. Project will avoid 6,000 tons of C02 annually,
equivalent to emissions from combustion of 14,000 barrels of
oil; equal the carbon sequestration from almost 5,000 acres of
forest; and provide electricity sufficient to power 1,200 homes
annually.
Rutland Landfill (Stafford
Hill)
VT
Rutland
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
2.3
Wholesale
Electricity
2015
The utility plans to lease the dormant landfill from the city for
25 years, with a 25-year option, for $30,600 a year
Townshend Landfill
VT
Townshend
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
0.15
Wholesale
Electricity
2014
Community solar project providing power to 15 residences as
well astheTown Hall and town library.
Wl-WISCONSIN
Beloit Coal Ash Landfill
Wl
Beloit
Landfill
Municipal
Solar
2.3
Wholesale
Electricity
2016
Enough clean energy to power 500 local homes.
MATC PV Evaluation Lab
Wl
Milwaukee
Landfill
Private
Solar
0.54
Onsite Use -
Training
2010
The estimated energy savings in the first year of operation is
$70,300. Energy produced at the site will be used to operate
the Milwaukee Public Television transmitter that is located at
the site. This will be the first public television transmitter in the
country that will transition to being neutral to the energy grid.
The facility also will serve as a training center for technicians,
designers, site assessors, electricians, sales personnel and other
professionals in the fields of renewable energy
v>EPA
33
Office of Communications, Partnerships, and Analysis
Office of Land and Emergency Management
-------
RE-Powering America's Land Initiative:
Benefits Matrix
February 2018
Through the RE-Powering America's Land initiative, the EPA encourages renewable energy development on potentially contaminated land, landfills, and mine sites when aligned with the community's
vision for the site. Using publicly available information, RE-Powering maintains a list of completed renewable energy installations on contaminated sites and landfills and compiles this information in
its ProiectTrackina Matrix. The followina list tracks benefits associated with completed sites identified and reported bv parties directlv involved with their respective projects (e.a.. information from the
associated city, town, or county; site owners; developers; utilities; and/or financiers) or from other EPA resources. Common benefits reported include revenues from land leases and taxes, electricity cost
savings associated with the reduced need to purchase power from the grid, job creation, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, et al. This resource is for informational purposes only. Please note that
the benefits listed here are not a comprehensive representation of all benefits associated with completed renewable energy projects on contaminated lands and such benefits are calculated in
various ways; nevertheless, this list illustrates the breadth of benefits being realized and highlighted across the country by those developing these types of installations.
Site/Project Name
State
City
Type of
Site
Site
Ownership
Type
RE Type
Project
Capacity
(MW)
Project Type
Completion
Date
Summary of Benefits Identified in
Publicly Available Sources
Energy Savings
Reven ue
Environmental
Job Creation
EPA
34
Office of Communications, Partnerships, and Analysis
Office of Land and Emergency Management
-------
RE-Powering America's Land Initiative:
February 2018
Benefits Matrix
Through the RE-Powering America's Land initiative, the EPA encourages renewable energy development on potentially contaminated land, landfills, and mine sites when aligned with the community's
vision for the site. Using publicly available information, RE-Powering maintains a list of completed renewable energy installations on contaminated sites and landfills and compiles this information in
its Project Tracking Matrix. The following list tracks benefits associated with completed sites identified and reported by parties directly involved with their respective projects (e.g., information from the
associated city, town, or county; site owners; developers; utilities; and/or financiers) or from other EPA resources. Common benefits reported include revenues from land leases and taxes, electricity cost
savings associated with the reduced need to purchase power from the grid, job creation, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, et al. This resource is for informational purposes only. Please note that
the benefits listed here are not a comprehensive representation of all benefits associated with completed renewable energy projects on contaminated lands and such benefits are calculated in
various ways; nevertheless, this list illustrates the breadth of benefits being realized and highlighted across the country by those developing these types of installations.
v>EPA
35
Office of Communications, Partnerships, and Analysis
Office of Land and Emergency Management
------- |