CATALOG DOCUMENTATION
REGIONAL EMAP DATABASE
1993-1994 NEW YORK/NEW JERSEY HARBOR SYSTEM
BENTHIC SPECIES REPLICATE ABUNDANCE BY SITE

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.	DATA SET IDENTIFICATION

2.	INVESTIGATOR INFORMATION

3.	DATA SET ABSTRACT

4.	OBJECTIVES AND INTRODUCTION

5.	DATA ACQUISITION AND PROCESSING METHODS

6.	DATA MANIPULATIONS

7.	DATA DESCRIPTION

8.	GEOGRAPHIC AND SPATIAL INFORMATION

9.	QUALITY CONTROL/QUALITY ASSURANCE

10.	DATA ACCESS

11.	REFERENCES

12.	TABLE OF ACRONYMS

13.	PERSONNEL INFORMATION

1. DATA SET IDENTIFICATION

1.1	Title of Catalog document
Regional EMAP Database

1993-1994 New York/New Jersey Harbor System
Benthic Species Replicate Abundance by Site

1.2	Author of the Catalog entry
Melissa Hughes, OAO Corporation

1.3	Catalog revision date
1 July 1997

1.4	Data set name

BENTHIC SPECIES REPLICATE ABUNDANCE DATA


-------
1.5 Task Group

Regional Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program

1.6	Data set identification code
226

1.7	Version
001

1.8	Requested Acknowledgment

If you plan to publish these data in any way, EPA requires a
standard statement for work it has supported:

"Although the data described in this article have been
funded wholly or in part by the U. S. Environmental
Protection Agency through its EMAP-Estuaries Program, it has
not been subjected to Agency review, and therefore does not
necessarily reflect the views of the Agency and no official
endorsement should be inferred."

2.	INVESTIGATOR INFORMATION
2.1 Principal Investigator

Ms. Darvene A. Adams

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Region II
2.2. Investigation Participant
Mr. Joel S. O'Connor

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Region II

3.	DATA SET ABSTRACT

3.1	Abstract of the Data Set

The BENTHIC SPECIES REPLICATE	ABUNDANCE data set presents data on

each benthic taxon identified	in each acceptable grab collected at a

station. A count of organisms	of the taxon identified from each

grab is recorded. Each taxon	is identified by Latin name.

3.2	Keywords for the Data Set

Benthic Species, Benthic Species Abundance, Species Abundance, Species
Composition, Taxon Abundance, Benthic Taxon Abundance

4.	OBJECTIVES AND INTRODUCTION

4.1 Program Objective

The project was designed to support resource management decisions
related to pollution control and remediation throughout the New
York/New Jersey (NY/NJ) Harbor and Bight Apex and to assist the
New York-New Jersey Harbor Estuary Program (HEP) in developing a


-------
contaminant monitoring strategy to be included in the Comprehensive
Conservation and Management Plan (CCMP) for the NY/NJ Harbor
system.

4.2 Data Set Objective

To provide an overview of the abundance of benthic organisms
in the NY/NJ harbor region based on random sampling.

4.3 Data Set Background Discussion

The New York/New Jersey Harbor System has been susceptible
to toxic contamination due to surrounding land uses. Harbor
sediments are contaminant reservoirs which can function as a
secondary source of these land use contaminants. Contaminated
sediments pose a substantial threat to Harbor resources and
are a management challenge. Adverse changes in the biota of
the system have been documented with increasing frequency, and
many of these changes have been linked to toxic contamination.

4.4 Summary of Data Set Parameters

The Benthic Abundance data set values were based on the
results of identifying the epifauna in the replicate samples.

5. DATA ACQUISITION AND PROCESSING METHODS

5.1 Data Acqui si ti on

5.1.1	Sampling Objective

Collect sediment grab samples suitable for the
identification of benthic organisms.

5.1.2	Sample Collection Methods Summary

The grab sampler was lowered through the water column; the
grab penetrated the sediment by gravity releasing
a trigger allowing the jaws to close. When the grab was
pulled from the sediment using the winch, the jaws closed,
encapsulating the sediment sample.

Three macroinvertebrate grabs per sampling station were collected
using the 0.04-m2 Young-modified van Veen grab. Benthic grabs
were alternated with sediment chemistry/toxicity grabs. Benthic
samples were gently washed through a 0.5 mm mesh sieve. The
material was preserved in a 10% buffered formaldehyde-rose bengal
soluti on.

5.1.3	Sampling Start Date

July 1993
July 1994

5.1.4	Sampling End Date

September 1993
September 1994


-------
5.1.5 Platform

Sampling was conducted from two U.S.EPA research vessels, the
R/V CLEAN WATERS and OSV PETER W. ANDERSON.

5.1.6	Sampli ng Gear

A 0.04-m2 or 0.1-m2, stainless steel, Young-modified Van
Veen Grab sampler was used to collect sediment grabs.

This grab sampled an area of 440 cm2 and a maximum
depth of penetration in the sediment of 10 cm.

5.1.7	Manufacturer of Sampling Equipment
Young's Welding, Sandwich, MA

5.1.8	Key Variables

No data were recorded at the time of sample collection.

5.1.9	Collection Method Calibration

The sampling gear did not require any calibration. It
required inspection for deformities incurred due to
mishandling or impact on rocky substrates.

5.1.10	Sample Collection Quality Control

A successful grab had relatively level, intact sediment over
the entire area of the grab and a sediment depth at the
center of at least 5 centimeters. Unacceptable grabs
included those with grossly slumped surfaces and those
completely filled to the top, where the sediment was
in direct contact with the hinged top.

The van Veen Grab was rinsed with ambient seawater between
grabs at a station to remove remaining organisms.

It was thoroughly cleaned with detergent and water
between stations.

5.1.11	Sample Collection Method Reference

Reifsteck, D.M., C.J. Strobel and D.J. Keith. 1993. Environmental
Monitoring and Assessment Program - Near Coastal Component: 1993
Virginian Province Field Operations and Safety Manual. U.S.
EPA NHEERL-AED. Narragansett, RI.

5.2 Data Preparation and Sample Processing

5.2.1 Sample Processing Objective

Process benthic sediment samples to accurately identify and
enumerate benthic infauna.


-------
5.2.2 Sample Processing Methods Summary

Three replicate grabs for benthic macroinvertebrate community structure
were obtained at each station. Invertebrates from two of these were
sorted and identified; the third replicate was archived. The
macrobenthos were identified to the lowest practical taxonomic category.

5.2.3	Sample Processing Method Calibration
NA.

5.2.4	Sample Processing Quality Control

Rare or previously undocumented specimens from the Harbor
were put aside in a reference collection.

5.2.5	Sample Processing Method Reference

Adams, D.A., J.S. O'Connor and S.B. Weisberg. 1996.

Sediment Quality of the NY/NJ Harbor System. Draft
Final Report. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-
Region 2. Edison, NJ. October 1996.

5.2.6	Sample Processing Method Deviations
NA

6.	DATA MANIPULATIONS

NA

6.1	Name of new or modified values
NA

6.2	Data Manipulation Description
NA

6.3	Data Manipulation Examples
NA

7.	DATA DESCRIPTION

7.1 Description of Parameters

#

Parameter
SAS Name

Data
Type

Len

Format

Parameter
Label

1

STATION

Char

8

0

Station Name

2

REP

Num

8

8

Replicate Number

3

COD EMAP

Char

8

16

EMAP Taxonomic Code

4

ABUNDANC

Num

8

24

Number (#) of Organisms

5

TAXNAME

Char

50

32

EMAP Name

6

FAMILY

Char

20

106

Family


-------
7.1.6	Precision to which values are reported
The abundance is reported as a whole number.

7.1.7	Minimum value in data set

Variable	MINIMUM

REP	1.0000000

ABUNDANC	0

7.1.8	Maximum value in Data Set

Variable	MAXIMUM

REP	2.0000000

ABUNDANC	5108.00

7.2 Data Record Example

7.2.1	Column Names for Example Records

STATION DATE LATIN NAME REP # T_ABN FAMILY

7.2.2	Example Data Records

STATION DATE LATIN NAME	REP # T ABN FAMILY

BA002 931003 Ampharetidae
BA002 931003 Aricidea catherinae
BA002 931003 Gammarus annulatus
BA002 931003 Goniadella gracilis
BA002 931003 Mediomastus ambiseta

GEOGRAPHIC AND SPATIAL INFORMATION

8.1	Minimum Longitude

-74 Degrees 16 Minutes 17.76 Decimal Seconds

8.2	Maximum Longitude

-73 Degrees 21 Minutes 0.72 Decimal Seconds

8.3	Minimum Latitude

40	Degrees 10 Minutes 35.00 Decimal Seconds

8.4	Maximum Latitude

41	Degrees 4 Minutes 53.22 Decimal Seconds

8.5	Name of area or region

New York/New Jersey Harbor System

Six sub-basins were sampled in the New York/New
Jersey Harbor, including: Upper Harbor, Newark Bay,
Lower Harbor (includes Raritan and Sandy Hook Bays),

8	Ampharetidae

6	Paraonidae

7	Gammaridae
16	Goniadidae

2	Capitellidae


-------
Jamaica Bay, western Long Island Sound and the New
York Bight Apex. For purposes of this study, the region
includes the lower portions of the Hudson, Passaic,

Harlem, Hackensack and Raritan Rivers, upstream to a
near-bottom salinity of 15 ppt, the East River to Long
Island Sound and Lower Harbor to the Atlantic Ocean.

The New York Bight Apex is defined as the area of ocean
bounded on the northwest by the transect from Sandy
Hook, NJ to Rockaway Point, NY, the east by 73 deg 30' W
longitude and the south by 40 deg. 10'N latitude. The
eastern boundary of the western Long Island Sound
sub-basin is 73 deg 24' W longitude (from Eaton's Neck
Point, NY to Norwalk, CT).

QUALITY CONTROL AND QUALITY ASSURANCE

9.1	Data Quality Objectives

Quality assurance goals were developed and followed
for each sample type.

9.2	Quality Assurance/Quality Control Procedures

Ten percent of all samples were reprocessed and subjected to
A second QA evaluation. Taxonomic identifications were
Verified using reference organisms obtained from EMAP's
reference collection.

9.3	Quality Assessment Results

These in-house QC measures met the requirements established
in the QA Plan.

9.4	Unassessed Errors
NA

. DATA ACCESS

10.1	Data Access Procedures

Data can be downloaded from the WWW server.

10.2	Data Access Restrictions

Data can only be accessed from the WWW server.

10.3	Data Access Contact Persons

Ms. Darvene A. Adams
U.S. EPA Region II

10.4	Data Set Format

NA


-------
10.5 Information Concerning Anonymous FTP

Data cannot be accessed via ftp.

10.6	Information Concerning Gopher and WWW
Data can be downloaded from the WWW servers.

10.7	EMAP CD-ROM Containing the Data Set
Data are not available on CD-ROM

11.	REFERENCES

Adams, D.A. and M. Hunt. 1993. Quality Assurance Project Plan
for Environmental Monitoring Projects, "Sediment Quality
of the NY/NJ Harbor." U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency-Region 2. Edison, NJ.

Adams, D.A., J.S. O'Connor and S.B. Weisberg. 1996. Sediment
Quality of the NY/NJ Harbor System. Draft Final Report. U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency-Region 2. Edison, NJ.

October 1996.

Overton, W.S., D.L. Stevens and D. White. 1990. Design Report
for EMAP: Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program.
EPA/600/3-91/053. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, ORD,
Washington, DC.

Reifsteck, D.M., C.J. Strobel and D.J. Keith. 1993. Environmental
Monitoring and Assessment Program - Near Coastal Component: 1993
Virginian Province Field Operations and Safety Manual. U.S.
EPA NHEERL-AED. Narragansett, RI.

U.S. EPA. 1993. EMAP Laboratory Methods Manual: Estuaries. U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and
Development, Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory,

Ci nci nnati, OH.

12.	TABLE OF ACRONYMS

13.	PERSONNEL INFORMATION

Principal Investigator
Ms. Darvene A. Adams
Monitoring and Assessment Branch
Division of Environmental Science and
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
2890 Woodbridge Ave.

Edison, NJ 08837

Joel S. O'Connor
Placed-Based Protection Branch

Division of Environmental Planning and Protection
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Region II

Assessment
- Region II


-------
Data Librarian, EMAP-IM
Melissa M. Hughes
OAO Corp.

U.S. EPA NHEERL-AED
27 Tarzwell Drive
Narragansett, RI 02882-1197
(401) 782-3184 (Tel.)
(401) 782-3030 (FAX)
hughes.meli ssa0epa.gov


-------