Information Collection Request Supporting Statement

United States Environmental Protection Agency
Textile Mills Industry Data Collection

November 2023


-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

PART A OF THE SUPPORTING STATEMENT	1

1.	Circumstances That Make the Collection of Information Necessary and

Legal Requirements That Necessitate the Collection	1

2.	How, by Whom, and for What Purpose the Information is to be Used	3

2(a) What Information Will Be Collected, Reported, or Recorded?	3

2(b) From Whom Will the Information Be Collected?	12

2(c) What Will the Information Be Used For?	12

2(d) How Will the Information Be Collected? Does the Respondent
have Multiple Options for Providing the Information? What Are

They?	13

2(e) How Frequently Will the Information Be Collected?	15

2(f) Will the Information Be Shared with Any Other Organizations

Inside or Outside the EPA or the Government?	15

2(g) If This Is an Ongoing Collection, How Have the Collection

Requirements Changed Over Time?	15

3.	To What Extent Does the Collection of Information Involve the Use of
Automated, Electronic, Mechanical, or Other Technology Collection
Techniques or Other Forms of Information Technology	15

4.	Efforts to Identify Duplication and Why Similar Information Already
Available Cannot be Used or Modified for Use for the Purposes Described

in Item 2	16

5.	Collection of Information Impacts to Small Businesses or Other Small

Entities and Methods to Minimize the Burden	18

6.	Consequence to Federal Program or Policy Activities if the Collection is
not Conducted or is Conducted Less Frequently and Any Technical or

Legal Obstacles to Reducing Burden	18

7.	Special Circumstances	20

8.	Publication of the Federal Register Notice and Public Response	20

8(a) Federal Register Notice Publication	20

8(b) Consultations	21

9.	Payment or Gift to Respondents	21

10.	Confidential Business information claims	21

11.	Questions of a Sensitive Nature	22

12.	Estimates of Respondent Burden for the Information Collection	22

12(a) Estimate of Respondent Hour Burden	22


-------
CONTENTS (Continued)

Page

12(b) Estimate of Respondent Labor Costs	25

13.	Total Annual Cost Burden to Respondents or Recordkeepers Resulting

from the Collection of Information	30

13(a) Estimating Capital/Start-up Operating and Maintenance Costs	30

13(b) Annualizing Capital Costs	31

14.	Annualized Cost to the Federal Government	32

15.	Reason for Any Program Changes or Adjustments in Burden Estimates

From the Previous Approved ICR	36

16.	Collection of Information Whose Results Will be Published	36

16(a) Technical Analyses Supported by the Questionnaire	36

16(b) Collection Schedule	38

16(c) Publication of Results	38

17.	Display of the Expiration Date for OMB Approval of the Information
Collection	38

18.	Certification for Reduction Act Submissions	39

PART B OF THE SUPPORTING STATEMENT	40

1.	Questionnaire Rationale	40

1(a) Population of Interest	40

1(b) Response Rate/No Response	40

2.	Collection of Information	41

2(a) Stratification/Sample Selection	41

3.	Estimation Procedure	42

4.	Accuracy/Precision	42

5.	Specialized Sampling Procedures	42

6.	Data Collection	42

7.	Response Rate/No response/Data Utility	42

7(a) Response Rate	42

7(b) No Response	43

7(c) Burden Reduction	43

7(d) Data Utility	43

8.	Tests of Procedures	43

9.	Contact Information	44

Appendix A: DRAFT QUESTIONNAIRE


-------
LIST OF TABLES

Page

Table 1-1. 40 CFR Part 410 Subparts	2

Table 2-1. Questionnaire Questions and Their Purpose	5

Table 4-1. Existing Data Sources	17

Table 12-1. Estimated Questionnaire Response Burden by Activity, Labor Category, and

Type of Response	23

Table 12-2. Estimated Burden for Sampling Program by Activity and Labor Category	25

Table 12-3. 2021 Mean Hourly Rates by Labor Category	26

Table 12-4. Total Estimated Respondent Labor Burden for the Questionnaire per

Respondent	26

Table 12-5. Estimated Questionnaire Respondents by Response Category and Total

Estimated Burden	28

Table 12-6. Total Estimated Labor Burden for One-Day Sampling Episode per Facility	29

Table 12-7. Total Estimated Respondent Labor Burden for Data Collection Activities	29

Table 13-1. Total Other Direct Costs for Respondents to the Questionnaire	30

Table 13-2. Total Other Direct Costs for Facilities Selected for Wastewater Sampling	31

Table 13-3. Total Estimated Respondent Burden and Cost Summary	31

Table 14-1. Estimated Agency Burden and Labor Costs for the Questionnaire	34

Table 14-2. Estimated Other Direct Costs for the Agency to Administer the

Questionnaire	35

Table 14-3. Estimated Agency Burden and Labor Costs for Wastewater Sampling	35

Table 14-4. Estimated Other Direct Costs for the Agency for Wastewater Sampling	36

Table 14-5. Total Estimated Agency Burden and Cost Summary	36

Table 16-1. Collection Schedule	38

iii


-------
March 2023

PART A OF THE SUPPORTING STATEMENT

United States Environmental Protection Agency
Textile Mills Industry Questionnaire
EPA ICR No. 2798.01
OMB Control No. 2040-NEW
Office: EPA Office of Water
Contact: Paul Shriner

1. CIRCUMSTANCES THAT MAKE THE COLLECTION OF INFORMATION NECESSARY AND
LEGAL REQUIREMENTS THAT NECESSITATE THE COLLECTION

For many decades, industrial facilities have used and discharged per- and polyfluoroalkyl
substances (PFAS) to the nation's waters. PFAS are a class of synthetic chemicals of concern to
the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) because of their widespread use,
potential to accumulate in the environment, and adverse human health effects. The EPA has
not established national technology-based numeric standards for PFAS in wastewater
discharges for any industrial point source category and few states have developed water quality
standards for PFAS. Therefore, few industrial facilities have PFAS monitoring requirements,
effluent limitations, or pretreatment standards for wastewater discharges.

As announced in the Effluent Guidelines Program Plan 15, published in January 2023, the EPA
plans to continue its detailed study investigating PFAS discharges from facilities in the Textile
Mills point source category. Based on information and data collected during the Multi-Industry
PFAS Study and the Textile Mills Detailed Study to date, the EPA determined PFAS are used by
some textile manufacturing facilities to impart water, grease, and stain resistance to finished
textiles, including consumer apparel, carpets, and technical textiles.

The EPA, through this Information Collection Request (ICR) package, requests that the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) review and approve the ICR for the Textile Mills Detailed
Study. Through this collection, the EPA will obtain data essential to determine if updated
regulations are required to address PFAS in wastewater discharges from textile manufacturing
facilities, including facilities regulated under the Textile Mills point source category as specified
by the Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards (ELGs) codified in Title 40 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 410. This collection effort is necessary because national data on
PFAS use, treatment, and discharge at textile manufacturing facilities is not currently available
and the EPA requires detailed information on industry practices to determine whether
technology based ELGs are appropriate for the textile industry.

The EPA initially promulgated the Textile Mills ELGs in 1974 and last amended the regulations in
1982. The current regulation covers wastewater discharges from direct discharger facilities
performing various textile manufacturing operations.

1


-------
March 2023

Within the textile mill industry, there are nine subcategories to which the regulation applies,
listed in Table 1-1.

Table 1-1. 40 CFR Part 410 Subparts

40 CFR §410 Subpart

Description

Subpart A - Wool Scouring

The provisions of this subpart are applicable to process wastewater discharges
resulting from the following types of textile mills: wool scouring, topmaking,
and general cleaning of raw wool.

Subpart B - Wool Finishing

The provisions of this subpart are applicable to process wastewater discharges
resulting from the following types of textile mills: wool finishers, including
carbonizing, fulling, dyeing, bleaching, rinsing, fireproofing, and other such
similar processes.

Subpart C - Low Water Use
Processing

The provisions of this subpart are applicable to process wastewater discharges
resulting from the following types of textile mills: yarn manufacture, yarn
texturizing, unfinished fabric manufacture, fabric coating, fabric laminating, tire
cord and fabric dipping, and carpet tufting and carpet backing. Rubberized or
rubber coated fabrics regulated by 40 CFR part 428 are specifically excluded.

Subpart D - Woven Fabric
Finishing

The provisions of this subpart are applicable to process wastewater discharges
resulting from the following types of textile mills: woven fabric finishers, which
may include desizing, bleaching, mercerizing, dyeing, printing, resin treatment,
water proofing, flame proofing, soil repellency application and a special finish
application.

Subpart E - Knit Fabric
Finishing

The provisions of this subpart are applicable to process wastewater discharges
resulting from the following types of textile mills: knit fabric finishers, which
may include bleaching, mercerizing, dyeing, printing, resin treatment, water
proofing, flame proofing, soil repellency application and a special finish
application.

Subpart F - Carpet Finishing

The provisions of this subpart are applicable to process wastewater discharges
resulting from the following types of textile mills: carpet mills, which may
bleaching, scouring, carbonizing, fulling, dyeing, printing, resin treatment,
waterproofing, flameproofing, soil repellency, looping, and backing with
foamed and unfoamed latex and jute. Carpet backing without other carpet
manufacturing operations is included in subpart C.

Subpart G - Stock and Yarn
Finishing

The provisions of this subpart are applicable to process wastewater discharges
resulting from the following types of textile mills: stock or yarn dyeing or
finishing, which may include cleaning, scouring, bleaching, mercerizing, dyeing
and special finishing.

Subpart H - Nonwoven
Manufacturing

The provisions of this subpart are applicable to process wastewater discharges
resulting from facilities that primarily manufacture nonwoven textile products
of wool, cotton, or synthetics, singly or as blends, by mechanical, thermal,
and/or adhesive bonding procedures. Nonwoven products produced by fulling
and felting processes are covered in subpart 1 - Felted Fabric Processing.

Subpart 1 - Felted Fabric
Processing

The provisions of this subpart are applicable to process wastewater discharges
resulting from facilities that primarily manufacture nonwoven products by
employing fulling and felting operations as a means of achieving fiber bonding.

2


-------
March 2023

Textile manufacturing facilities (i.e., textile mills) receive and prepare fibers; transform fibers
into yarn, thread, and webbing; convert yarn and webbing into fabric or related products; and
finish textile materials using various chemical and physical applications. Since the Textile Mills
ELG promulgation in 1974, synthetic textiles and fiber production has increased. Facilities that
manufacture synthetic textile materials may additionally be subject to other ELGs, including the
Plastics Molding and Forming (40 CFR Part 463), Organic Chemicals, Synthetic Fibers, and
Plastics (40 CFR Part 414) ELGs. The EPA is considering all facilities manufacturing natural and
synthetic textile products as part of the Textile Mills Detailed Study.

Through the Multi-Industry PFAS Study and Textile Mills Detailed Study, the EPA determined
that PFAS may enter textile manufacturing wastewater streams as part of fabric finishing
processes including fabric coating, laminating, waterproofing, soil repellency, and
flameproofing. In November 2021, the EPA administered a data collection request under CWA
Section 308 authority to nine entities that the EPA identified as textile manufacturing
companies likely to have used PFAS. As stated in ELG Program Plan 15, published January 2023,
the EPA concluded that the data received from this request were insufficient to determine
whether revisions to the Textile Mills ELGs are needed to address nationwide PFAS discharges
from the textile manufacturing industry. The data collection activities described in this ICR will
provide a robust data set that characterizes PFAS use and wastewater generation, treatment,
and discharge from textile manufacturing facilities in the United States.

The Textile Mills industry will devote time and resources to respond to this ICR. The EPA
estimates that the total burden to the approximately 2,200 textile manufacturing facilities for
responding to the questionnaire and the approximately 20 facilities participating in the
wastewater sampling program will be approximately 30,568 hours, or $1.37 million, including
labor and other direct costs. The EPA estimates that the total burden to the Agency for the
questionnaire will be approximately 5,809 hours, or $717,705, including labor costs and other
direct costs. The collection design represents the EPA's efforts to gather sufficient data to
perform the analyses required to accurately review the ELGs for textile manufacturing
operations, yet at the same time, administer an ICR that limits the burden placed on
respondents.

2. HOW, BY WHOM, AND FOR WHAT PURPOSE THE INFORMATION IS TO BE USED

2(a) What Information Will Be Collected, Reported, or Recorded?

The EPA's Office of Water plans to administer the data collection, including a one-time
questionnaire and wastewater sampling program, under the authority of Section 308 of the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 USC., Section 1318 (Clean Water Act). The EPA first
plans to administer a questionnaire as a census to all facilities that currently or historically
conducted textile mill operations in the United States. Based on the data sources discussed in
Section 4, the EPA has identified and compiled mailing addresses for approximately 2,200
textile manufacturing facilities in the United States. All active textile manufacturing facilities
that conduct or have conducted one or more of the specified operations will be required to
complete the questionnaire regardless of size, geography, production, and whether the facility

3


-------
March 2023

discharges wastewater directly to surface waters, indirectly to surface waters through POTWs,
or does not discharge wastewater. No single existing data source includes information for all
facilities engaging in one or more of the specified operations. The EPA will continue to refine
the list of facilities by identifying additional or duplicate facilities and collaborating with state
regulatory authorities and textile industry trade associations, including the Carpet and Rug
Institute (CRI), the National Carpet and Textile Organization (NCTO), and the American
Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists (AATCC) before administering the questionnaire.
For the purposes of this ICR, the EPA estimates the population of textile manufacturing facilities
that will receive and be required to complete the questionnaire as 2,200 facilities.

The objectives of the questionnaire will be to confirm the population of facilities that engage or
have engaged in textile manufacturing operations, as well as gather facility-specific information
and data relevant to generation and discharge of PFAS-containing wastewater by the industry,
including:

•	General facility identification, industrial classification, ELG applicability, and wastewater
permitting information.

•	Type and size (both production and employees) of each facility.

•	Details on textile mill operations, including the type(s) of products manufactured and
types of processes performed.

•	Use of PFAS in textile mill operations, including type and quantity of PFAS used,
rationale for use, and whether these operations generate PFAS-containing wastewater.

•	Wastewater generation, characteristics (including PFAS and other pollutant
concentrations and flow rate), and management data.

The questionnaire consists of 42 questions. A copy of the draft questionnaire is included in
Appendix A. The EPA believes that all the information and data requested in the questionnaire
is readily available to facilities; the EPA does not anticipate facilities will need to generate new
information or data to complete the questionnaire. The data items requested by the
questionnaire and the purpose for requesting the information are listed in Table 2-1. Facilities
that receive the questionnaire but have never conducted textile mill operations or will
permanently cease all textile mill operations by 2023 will not be required to complete the full
questionnaire. Most facilities will not be required to complete every question as not all
questions will be applicable to every facility (e.g., facilities that have never used PFAS in the
manufacture of textiles will not need to complete most questions).

The EPA plans to conduct the questionnaire via a web-based platform, Qualtrics Survey
Software (Qualtrics). The questionnaire will primarily collect data for calendar year 2023, which
represents the most recent year for which complete technical and economic data will be
available as the EPA expects the survey will be administered in 2024. The questionnaire will also
collect limited data for time periods prior to 2023. These data will be used by the EPA to
determine if facilities that historically used PFAS are potential sources of PFAS discharges and
changes in industry operation and economics.

4


-------
March 2023

Table 2-1. Questionnaire Questions and Their Purpose

Section

Question
Number(s)

Question Description

Purpose

1-General

Facility

Information

1-2

Provide the facility name, physical address, and
contact information (i.e., name, phone number, email, mailing
address) for technical and financial information reported in the
questionnaire.

Confirm and correct errors in the facility list including
facility name and address. The EPA will use contact
information reported for the facility to conduct
follow up, as necessary.



3

Identify whether the facility has engaged in manufacture of one
or more textile products operations at any time since the facility
began operation. If so, requests an overview of the types of
textile products manufactured at the facility. Facilities that
respond "no" to this question will not be required to complete
the remainder of the questionnaire.

Identify facilities that should complete the
questionnaire; facilities that have never engaged in
manufacture of one or more textile products are
exempted from the remainder of the questionnaire.



4

Identify the ultimate parent company and, if applicable, provide
the name, title, phone number, email, and mailing address for a
primary point of contact for the ultimate parent company.

Ownership information for ultimate parent
companies will be used to evaluate the financial
structure of the industry. The EPA will use
information reported for the ultimate parent
company to conduct follow up, as necessary.



5

Provide all six-digit NAICS code(s) applicable to the facility.

Identify small businesses per the Small Business
Association (SBA) definitions, confirm the facility
information in the facility list, and confirm the NAICS
codes impacted by the Textile Mills ELGs.



6

Provide the 12-digit Facility Registry Service (FRS) identification
number (also known as the EPA Registry ID) associated with the
facility.

Confirm the facility information in the facility list,
identify any duplicate entries in the industry profile,
and pull additional information for these facilities
from existing the EPA data sets (e.g., the EPA ECHO).

2 - Textile
Production &
Wastewater
Generation

7

Specify the year the facility began manufacturing operations of
one or more textile products.

Determine the approximate age and duration of
operations of facilities, if textile manufacture
occurred during the time period when legacy PFAS
were more likely to be used.

5


-------
March 2023

Table 2-1. Questionnaire Questions and Their Purpose

Section

Question
Number(s)

Question Description

Purpose



8

Identify whether the facility permanently closed or permanently
discontinued all textile manufacturing operations as of January
1, 2024. Facilities that respond "yes" to this question will not be
required to complete Questions 9 through 13 of the
questionnaire.

Determine whether the facility currently conducts
textile manufacturing operations that may result in
the discharge of PFAS in wastewaters. Facilities that
have permanently closed or have permanently
ceased all textile manufacturing operations will
answer questions only as they apply to legacy
wastewaters.



9

Identify whether the facility will permanently close or
permanently discontinue all textile manufacturing operations by
December 31, 2028.

Determine whether the facility would be included in
the population evaluated and expected to incur
compliance costs under a potential rulemaking.
Facilities that will permanently close or cease all
textile manufacturing operations would likely not
likely incur any compliance costs for the rulemaking
because they will not be subject to 40 CFR Parts 410
by the time a final rulemaking would be fully
implemented.



10

Identify the intended end use of textile products manufactured
at the facility.

Determine the types of textiles the facility produces.
Information will be used to determine which textile
products may be manufactured with PFAS.



11

Provide the total volume of textiles produced by the facility
during calendar year 2023.

Determine the relative size of the facility compared
to other textile manufacturing facilities. Estimate
total volume of textiles produced across the industry.



12

Provide total wastewater flows from the facility and the final
destinations of wastewater discharges, including whether
wastewater is discharged to surface waters or publicly owned
treatment works (POTWs).

Quantify the volume of wastewater discharged from
the facility and determine whether the facility is
classified as a direct or indirect discharger to inform
ELG applicability.



13

Report whether the facility has modified operations in a manner
that affects the quantity of wastewater generated or discharged
at the facility since January 1, 2000

Determine whether any water reduction efforts have
taken place at textile manufacturing facilities.

6


-------
March 2023

Table 2-1. Questionnaire Questions and Their Purpose

Section

Question
Number(s)

Question Description

Purpose



14

Collects information relevant to existing water discharge
requirements (NPDES permits, pretreatment agreements,
stormwater permits, underground injection control permits) and
local ordinances such as permit/ordinance number, type of
requirement, regulatory authority, expiration date, and type of
wastewater covered by requirement. Requests facilities to
submit relevant wastewater permit documents.

Identify duplicate information in the facility list
where permit IDs may have variations in facility
names, understand how facilities are managing
wastewater, and how regulatory authorities are
permitting water discharge requirements. Collects
permit materials that may be used for future permit
review.



15

Identify the Subparts of 40 CFR Part 410 that apply to the
operations conducted at the facility in 2023.

Identify how textile manufacturing facilities are being
permitted for the ELGs and understand potential
overlap between subparts. Information collected may
be used to identify inconsistencies or improper
permitting of facilities.



16

Identify ELGs other than 40 CFR Part 410 that apply to facility
operations.

Identify how textile manufacturing facilities are being
permitted for the ELGs and understand potential
overlap between textile related ELGs. Information
collected may be used to identify inconsistencies or
improper permitting of facilities.

3 - Facility
Operations and
PFAS Use

17

Identify if the facility intentionally has ever used, blended,
integrated, or applied one or more PFAS in the textile
manufacturing process since operations began. Facilities that
respond "no" to this question will not be required to complete
the remainder of the questionnaire.

Identify textile manufacturing facilities that have
historically used PFAS in the textile products
manufactured at the facility to assess whether they
may discharge legacy PFAS wastewater, including
PFOA and PFOS. Facilities that select no will not be
required to complete the remainder of the
questionnaire.



18

Identify if the facility intentionally used, blended, integrated, or
applied one or more PFAS in the textile manufacturing process
since January 1, 2000. Facilities that respond "no" to this
question will not be required to complete the remainder of the
questionnaire.

Determines if the facility has used PFAS in
manufacturing processes in recent history in order to
collect further information that will be reasonably
accessible to the respondent. Facilities that have not
used PFAS in textile manufacturing since the year
2000 will not be required to complete the remainder
of the questionnaire.

7


-------
March 2023

Table 2-1. Questionnaire Questions and Their Purpose

Section

Question
Number(s)

Question Description

Purpose



19

Identify if the facility intentionally used, blended, integrated, or
applied one or more PFAS in the textile manufacturing process
during calendar year 2023. If not, identifies steps taken to
eliminate PFAS use. Facilities that respond "no" to this question
will not be required to complete questions 20 to 22 of the
questionnaire.

Identify textile manufacturing facilities that currently
use PFAS in the manufacture of textile products to
assess whether they may currently discharge PFAS in
process wastewater. Additionally identifies available
alternatives to PFAS-based products in textile
manufacturing and process modifications that have
been put in place to eliminate PFAS use.

20

Provide the percent of total annual production volume of textile
products manufactured using PFAS in 2023.

Estimate the PFAS-related production at facilities
relative to total production. Identifies potential
legacy PFAS discharge from historic PFAS use.

21

Identify textile manufacturing processes involved in the
intentional use, blending, integration, or application of PFAS
during the manufacture of textile products and whether the
process line generates wastewater.

Assess which textile manufacturing operations
currently use PFAS to aid in subcategorization and
determine if process wastewater subject to ELGs may
contain PFAS.

22

Report whether the facility manufactures products that must
meet certain military or original equipment manufacturer
specification and provide the specific standards.

Identifies military or other product specifications that
might affect the facility's ability to implement process
changes while manufacturing the same products.

23

Identify all PFAS or PFAS-containing products that are currently
or have historically been used as part of textile manufacturing at
the facility. Identifies most recent year of use for each product.

Identifies PFAS products and suppliers used by the
textile manufacturing industry. Also establishes
trends for legacy PFAS use transitioning either away
from PFAS or to alternative PFAS chemistries.

24

Identify if the facility planning to add, remove, or modify
operations in a manner which will change the quantity or type of
PFAS intentionally used, blended, integrated, or applied to
textile products at the facility by December 31, 2028.

Determine whether planned changes at the facility
will impact PFAS use and evaluate industry trends.

4-Wastewater
Generation

25

Report whether the facility generated wastewater from any
processes associated with textile manufacturing operations in
2023. Facilities that respond "no" to this question will not be
required to respond to Sections 4 through 7 of the questionnaire.

Determine which facilities should complete
subsequent questions specific to wastewater
generation and treatment.

26

Identify and describe wastewater streams generated on site or
transferred to the facility during the 2023 calendar year.

Identifies process wastewater streams to determine
which manufacturing processes generate wastewater
and assess industry trends in relative wastewater
generation.

8


-------
March 2023

Table 2-1. Questionnaire Questions and Their Purpose

Section

Question
Number(s)

Question Description

Purpose



27

Report whether the facility is planning to modify operations in a
manner that will affect process wastewater generated on site or
transferred to the facility by December 31, 2028.

Determine whether planned changes at the facility
will impact the quantity or quality of wastewater
potentially discharged and evaluate industry trends
in wastewater generation.

5-Wastewater
Flow Diagram

28

Provide one or more wastewater flow diagrams depicting the
current treatment and management practices for each
wastewater generated on site or transferred to the facility.
Include each wastewater stream, wastewater treatment unit,
and wastewater destination. The diagram should also identify
any solid waste residuals generated on site or transferred to the
facility, including process waste, wastewater treatment sludge,
and spent water treatment residuals (e.g., spent activated
carbon or resin), and identify the ultimate destination of the
solid waste (e.g., centralized waste treatment facility, landfill).

Identify operations that generate wastewater or solid
waste residuals, the relative amount of wastewater
or waste, and how wastewater is handled at the
facility. Inform selection of facilities for site visits or
future sampling, assess whether the facility's system
has pollutant removal treatment-in-place, and
identify treatment system configuration and
treatment unit redundancy.

6-Wastewater
Management and
Treatment

29

Identify if the facility discharges or transfers off site any
wastewater generated from textile manufacturing operations at
any point during calendar year 2023.

Facilities that respond "no" to this question proceed to question
36 of the questionnaire.

Identifies facilities that generate wastewater
specifically from textile manufacturing operations
and would therefore be potentially subject to ELGs.

30-32

Collects information on the number of final outfalls and details
on each destination, such as the flow rate and frequency of
discharge at each final outfall, type of surface water or
destination, and the name and physical address of any facilities
that received wastewater from the facility in 2023.

Profile the industry by type of discharge location and
characterize the types of surface waters and facilities
which receive discharges from textile manufacturing
facilities.

33

Asks if the facility operated one or more wastewater treatment
units on site in 2023. Facilities that respond "no" to this question
proceed to question 36 of the questionnaire.

Identify facilities that treat wastewater on site.

9


-------
March 2023

Table 2-1. Questionnaire Questions and Their Purpose

Section

Question
Number(s)

Question Description

Purpose



34

Collects the following information for each onsite wastewater
treatment unit used to treat any wastewater generated on site
or transferred to the facility during 2023: treatment unit name
and type, annual average flow rate, number of days operated,
average resident time, technology vendor name, treatment
media replacement frequency, date added to treatment system,
and cost information.

Determine current treatment-in-place and identify
new treatment technologies and best management
practices to help identify treatment trends in the
industry. Select facilities for site visits or future
sampling. Cost data for treatment unit installation
will be used to validate cost data for similar
treatments across the industry and from other
sources (e.g., vendors).



35

Provide the total annual average flow rate for influent to and
effluent from the wastewater treatment system in 2023.

Assess the total capacity of the wastewater
treatment system and inform costing of wastewater
treatment system modifications.



36

Determines if the facility generates one or more solid wastes
from textile manufacture or wastewater treatment. If so,
collects information on the solid waste generated in 2023, such
as waste name, waste source/description, annual generation
rate, final destination, and destination facility.

Determine the final destinations of textile wastes or
wastewater treatment solids that may contain PFAS
from textile operations.



37

Identify if the facility has transferred or removed wastewater
sludge from the site since 2000.

Identify sludge removal or transfer efforts that may
affect sludge composition and legacy PFAS release.



38

Report planned changes to management or treatment of
wastewaters by December 31, 2028.

Determine whether planned changes at the facility
will impact the quantity or quality of wastewater
potentially discharged.

7 - PFAS Studies
and Monitoring
Data

39

Collects information on facility conducted, funded, or sponsored
studies assessing the feasibility, cost, or performance of any
technologies or methods for disposal, treatment, or destruction
of PFAS, PFAS-containing water, or PFAS containing waste. If so,
provide study name, author, and submission details.

Assess the availability of PFAS data for textile
manufacturing wastewaters and if treatments are
currently being studied to address PFAS discharges.



40

Collects information on PFAS monitoring requirements, PFAS
effluent limitations, and PFAS pretreatment standards for the
facility, including those in current wastewater discharge permits,
consent decrees, set by regulatory authorities, required for
process control, or other monitoring required to be conducted
by the facility.

Assess the availability of PFAS data for textile
manufacturing wastewaters. Also indicates if PFAS
has previously been identified as a potential issue in
facility wastewaters.

10


-------
March 2023

Table 2-1. Questionnaire Questions and Their Purpose

Section

Question
Number(s)

Question Description

Purpose



41

Collects information on individual wastewater sampling results
for PFAS that were collected at any location within the facility
prior to discharge (including untreated wastewater; in-plant
sampling points; wastewater treatment influent, intermediate
points, or effluent) since January 1, 2018, including all individual
wastewater sampling results analyzed for PFAS using any
analytical method and required monitoring and voluntary
monitoring sampling results.

Assess the availability of PFAS data for textile
manufacturing wastewaters to characterize PFAS
discharges from the industry.



42

Collects information on individual wastewater sampling results
for PFAS that were collected for final effluent or facility
discharge since January 1, 2018.

Assess the availability of PFAS data for textile
manufacturing wastewaters, specifically for final
discharge to assist with pollutant loadings estimates.

8-Comments



Allows users to provide comments and extra details related to
the questions in the questionnaire.



11


-------
March 2023

Following receipt of the completed questionnaires, the EPA will request approximately 20
textile manufacturing facilities to collect wastewater samples. The EPA will provide sampling
supplies to each facility selected for the wastewater sampling program and contract
laboratories to analyze samples collected. The wastewater sampling program will generate
information and data critical to characterizing wastewaters generated and discharged by textile
manufacturing facilities and assess capability of existing wastewater treatment units to reduce
or eliminate PFAS. The EPA will use information and data collected via the questionnaire to
identify participants in the wastewater sampling program. In selecting facilities to participate in
the wastewater sampling program, the EPA will target a mix of facility types, sizes, and current
practices/technologies such that the data generated reflect wastewater from all types of textile
manufacturing operations. The wastewater sampling data collected will be used to characterize
wastewater discharges from the industry, including PFAS discharges and facility treatment
system capabilities.

2(b) From Whom Will the Information Be Collected?

The questionnaire will collect information from an estimated 2,200 textile manufacturing
facilities located in the United States. The subsequent wastewater sampling program will
require a subset of approximately 20 textile manufacturing facilities that completed the
questionnaire to also collect wastewater samples and submit them to an the EPA-contracted
laboratory. The respondents affected by this ICR are primarily classified under the following
NAICS codes:

•	3131 - Fiber, Yarn, and Thread Mills.

•	3132 - Fabric Mills.

•	3133 - Textile and Fabric Finishing and Fabric Coating Mills

•	3252 - Resin, Synthetic Rubber, and Artificial and Synthetic Fibers and Filaments
Manufacturing

As previously stated, not all facilities reporting the above NAICS codes will receive or complete
the questionnaire. The EPA used the 2022 Davison's Textile Blue Book, a self-reported directory
of textile manufacturing facilities that is updated annually, as the primary list of recipients for
the questionnaire. See Section 4 for more information on the EPA's efforts to refine this list.

2(c) What Will the Information Be Used For?

The EPA will use the questionnaire data to refine the national profile of textile manufacturing
facilities from which additional data collection, including site visits or wastewater sampling,
may be based. The EPA will also use the questionnaire data to evaluate the current technology-
based ELGs and determine if revised requirements are warranted to address PFAS and other
pollutants (as the EPA Administrator deems appropriate) in wastewater discharges. The EPA will
collect and analyze information pertaining to wastewater characteristics (e.g., pollutants
discharged, wastewater flows), and pollution control practices and technologies (e.g., pollution
prevention techniques, wastewater treatment units). Specifically, the EPA will use responses to

12


-------
March 2023

characterize the type and quantity of PFAS discharged from textile manufacturing facilities and
to determine if PFAS discharges can be controlled using demonstrated pollution control
practices and technologies.

Based on current information and data available for textile manufacturing facilities, the EPA
believes approximately 50% are direct dischargers to surface waters and the remaining are
either indirect dischargers (discharge to a POTW or third-party treatment facility) or do not
discharge process wastewaters. Direct dischargers report monitoring data as part of their
wastewater permit requirements and the data are publicly available through the EPA systems,
such as Integrated Compliance Information System - National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (ICIS-NPDES). Data from indirect dischargers are not publicly available in a national,
centralized system but instead are maintained at the state or pretreatment authority. Further,
most textile manufacturing facilities are not required to sample or report for PFAS in their
wastewater regardless of whether they are direct or indirect dischargers. The EPA will use data
collected through the questionnaire and wastewater sampling program to characterize
operations, wastewater generation, wastewater characteristics, wastewater management, and
wastewater discharges across all textile manufacturing facilities in the United States regardless
of size, geography, production, type of discharge, and current management practices.

2(d) How Will the Information Be Collected? Does the Respondent have Multiple Options
for Providing the Information? What Are They?

Each textile manufacturing facility will receive a questionnaire notification letter which provides
instructions, a URL to an EPA webpage, and a facility-specific access code. Facilities will access
the URL, be directed via a button link on the EPA webpage to the login webpage, and log in
using the access code in the notification letter. The web-based survey will allow for electronic
review and completion of the questionnaire. The questionnaire notification letter will also
include instructions for respondents unable to access the online version. This letter will be sent
via the United States Postal Service or other delivery service to each facility to ensure that a
facility point of contact receives and signs for it. Each facility selected for the questionnaire will
be allowed 60 calendar days from the time of receipt to submit the completed questionnaire.

The EPA will include a helpline email address and phone number in the instructions that
respondents can use to request assistance in completing the questionnaire. Using these
assistance methods enables respondents to receive a timely response to any inquiries they may
have. Email and phone communication will also reduce any misinterpretations of the
questionnaire and the burden of follow-up phone calls and letters to respondents.

The questionnaire will include information relevant to the purpose and authority under which
the EPA is conducting the survey; instructions for accessing, completing, and submitting the
questionnaire; information on confidential business information (CBI) claims; and a glossary
with all pertinent definitions, references, and acronyms to understand and complete the
questionnaire. On the EPA website, downloadable PDF copies of the questionnaire will be
available for respondents to print out and use as a working copy, helping them gather and
organize response data before beginning data entry.

13


-------
March 2023

Facilities that are unable to access the online version will be directed to contact the EPA. Upon
contacting the EPA, staff will mail a package via the United States Postal Service or other
trackable delivery service, containing a hardcopy questionnaire. Respondents may also request
a PDF version of the questionnaire be delivered via email that they can print on site. Hardcopy
questionnaires can be filled out by hand and returned to the EPA by mail. The EPA and its
contractors will enter the hardcopy questionnaire responses into Qualtrics so all responses can
be reviewed and analyzed in a consistent format.

Once the questionnaire response period is complete, the EPA and its contractors will export all
responses from Qualtrics and review the questionnaire responses for completeness and CBI
claims. Responses will also be reviewed for consistency and reasonableness and follow-up calls
will be conducted as needed to clarify inconsistencies found in the responses. Questionnaire
responses will be imported into a questionnaire database which will be used by the EPA to
perform data analysis for the purpose of determining whether revisions to the ELGs are
warranted.

In addition to technical data provided by facilities in the questionnaire, the EPA may need to
collect and analyze wastewater samples from a subset of respondents to characterize types and
quantities of PFAS in textile manufacturing wastewater and evaluate performance of available
pollution control practices and technologies. In this case, each textile manufacturing facility
selected to conduct sampling and analysis of analytical data will be contacted by the EPA
directly with instructions on how to participate in wastewater sampling activities. The EPA will
coordinate with each facility to develop detailed facility-specific sampling plans and determine
when sampling should occur.

The EPA has conducted, is conducting, or will conduct the following activities to administer the
questionnaire:

•	Develop the technical questions for the questionnaire.

•	Estimate the population of facilities conducting one or more textile mill operations in
the United States by evaluating data sources listed in Section 4.

•	Conduct outreach meetings with trade associations, industry representatives, public
interest groups, state regulating agencies, the EPA workgroup, OMB, and other invested
parties to refine questionnaire content (e.g., technical questions, instructions,
terminology and glossary) and the population of textile manufacturing facilities.

•	Develop the ICR Supporting Statement.

•	Revise the questionnaire based on comments from trade associations, industry
representatives, public interest groups, state regulating agencies, the EPA workgroup
members, OMB, and other invested parties.

•	Finalize the facility list by making any updates based on comments from trade
associations, industry representatives, and public interest groups.

•	Develop mailing labels.

14


-------
March 2023

•	Develop the web-based questionnaire platform in Qualtrics.

•	Develop and distribute the cover letters and instructions to notify facilities of the ICR.

•	Develop a tracking system for the questionnaire cover letter mail-out and offline
questionnaire return activities.

•	Test the final questionnaire in Qualtrics prior to launch.

•	Develop a questionnaire database to house and analyze responses.

•	Prepare and distribute questionnaire packages to all recipients.

•	Develop and maintain helplines (phone and email) for respondents who require
assistance in completing their questionnaire.

•	Receive and review responses, including data entry and review of hardcopy responses
into Qualtrics.

•	Follow up with facilities on responses as needed.

•	Summarize and analyze responses.

•	Conduct technical analyses and summarize results, and select facilities to participate in
the wastewater sampling program.

2(e) How Frequently Will the Information Be Collected?

The information covered by this ICR is a one-time information collection.

2(f) Will the Information Be Shared with Any Other Organizations Inside or Outside the
EPA or the Government?

The EPA may share all information not claimed as CBI and collected through this ICR within the
EPA and with other Government agencies, the industry, trade associations, and the public, as
necessary. Further, the EPA may share information claimed as CBI in accordance with its
regulations under 40 CFR Part 2, Subpart B.

2(g) If This Is an Ongoing Collection, How Have the Collection Requirements Changed Over
Time?

This ICR request is not an ongoing data collection.

3. TO WHAT EXTENT DOES THE COLLECTION OF INFORMATION INVOLVE THE USE OF
AUTOMATED, ELECTRONIC, MECHANICAL, OR OTHER TECHNOLOGY COLLECTION
TECHNIQUES OR OTHER FORMS OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

The EPA plans to develop the questionnaire in Qualtrics, which allows respondents to fill out
and submit the questionnaire online. The Qualtrics questionnaire will be developed to meet the
1998 Government Paperwork Elimination Act (GPEA). The EPA anticipates that most
respondents will be familiar and comfortable with online submission forms. Additionally, the
Qualtrics questionnaire will include automatic validation checks to minimize data entry errors

15


-------
March 2023

and allow for automatic export of a response data set, reducing the potential for errors
introduced by key-entry of data. The EPA's email and phone helpline will also be available
during the response period to assist facilities with submitting responses.

The EPA designed the questionnaire to include burden-reducing features. For example, the
questionnaire contains "screening" questions that direct respondents that do not qualify as the
population of interest for a particular subset of questions to indicate their status and then
bypass this subset of questions. The questionnaire is also designed with drop down menus to
simplify and standardize responses, minimizing the number of narrative text responses.

The EPA will provide a mechanism for facilities to respond with a hardcopy mailed response if
the facility cannot access the internet. The EPA anticipates this situation to affect less than 2
percent of the total population that receives the questionnaire.

4. EFFORTS TO IDENTIFY DUPLICATION AND WHY SIMILAR INFORMATION ALREADY

AVAILABLE CANNOT BE USED OR MODIFIED FOR USE FOR THE PURPOSES DESCRIBED
IN ITEM 2

The EPA identified the 2022 Davison's Textile Blue Book as the primary source for identifying
the population of textile manufacturing facilities in the United States. The EPA used this self-
reported directory, as well as other data sources listed in Table 4-1, to establish a list of
recipients for the questionnaire and to evaluate existing facility and/or wastewater
characteristics.

16


-------
March 2023

Table 4-1. Existing Data Sources

Data Source
Name

Date of Data
Collection

Population Included

Data Available

Considerations

Data Sources Used to Identify Textile Manufacturing Facilities

Davison's 2022
Textile Blue Book
- Mills, Dyers, and
Finishers

2022

The Blue Book consists of two lists:
Textile Mills, Dyers, and Finishers;
and Textile Suppliers. Self-reported
U.S. facilities in the Textiles Mills,
Dyers, and Finishers list were
included. 2,145 records.

•	Facility Name

•	Address

•	Process Description/Type

•	Textile/Fiber Type

•	Contact Information

•	Number of Employees

List includes facilities outside of the U.S.
Information is self-reported and may
reflect corporate or facility-level details.
Thus, if corporate details are provided,
the blue book may not capture every
facility under one parent company. Does
not include information on PFAS use,
wastewater generation or management,
or PFAS discharge.

2021 Textiles Mills
308 Data Request

2021

Facilities associated with one of the
nine parent companies that were
issued the data request. 92 records.

•	Facility Name

•	Address

•	NAICS/SIC Code

•	Process Description

•	Contact Information

•	FRS ID

•	PFAS Use

•	Closure Information

Responses to the PFAS data requests
capture a complete set of information for
facilities operated by the nine recipients,
which may not be representative of the
entire PFAS manufacturing industry.

Region and State

Permitting

Authorities

2021-2022

Facilities on lists provided by states.

AL: 29 records.

GA: 19 records.

NC: 14 records.

NJ: 16 records.

Ml, NH, Wl: 1 record each.

•	Address

•	Facility Name

•	Address

•	Latitude/Longitude

•	NAICS/SIC Code

•	Process Description

•	Fiber Type

•	Contact Information

•	PFAS Use

•	Discharge Information

•	NPDES and Pretreatment IDs

•	Treatment Information

•	Closure Information

The lists obtained do not cover every
state with textile manufacturing as only
states that were contacted for the EPA
outreach provided lists. Not all state data
provides the same facility-level details,
including information on processes, PFAS
use/discharge, or wastewater generation
or management.

17


-------
March 2023

As demonstrated in Table 4-1, none of the existing data sources provide a complete listing of all
textile manufacturing facilities in the United States nor do they all include information on PFAS
use, wastewater generation or management, and PFAS discharge. The EPA extracted and
aggregated information from these data sources to develop a best available listing of textile
manufacturing facilities. However, facility names and addresses are often inconsistent and may
change over time as ownership changes or addresses of record change. Based on the data
evaluated to date, the EPA estimates the population of textile manufacturing facilities is
approximately 2,200 facilities. While the EPA has attempted to identify duplicate records based
on similar facility name, city/state address, and other unique identifiers, some duplicate records
may still exist. The EPA is aware of a general decreasing trend in the size of the Textile Mills
industry since 1990, as reported by several state regulating agencies in meetings held in 2021
and 2022. The EPA will continue to coordinate with industry trade associations to identify
additional duplicate records and facilities included on the facility list that may not perform
textile mill operations or may no longer be operating.

Although the consulted sources have provided valuable industry information, and the EPA has
and will continue to use this information to understand current industry practices, these
sources do not provide the Agency with complete and up-to-date site-specific technical and
economic data that covers the entire textile mill industry and are crucial to the review of the
Textile Mills ELGs.

5.	COLLECTION OF INFORMATION IMPACTS TO SMALL BUSINESSES OR OTHER SMALL
ENTITIES AND METHODS TO MINIMIZE THE BURDEN

In accordance with requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the EPA must assess
whether actions would have "a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities"
(SISNOSE). Small entities include small businesses, small organizations, and small governmental
jurisdictions.

The EPA has taken steps to ensure that the respondent burden is minimized for small entities,
while collecting sufficient data to evaluate regulatory flexibility for small entities. To minimize
the burden of responding to the questionnaire, the EPA has written a series of questions that
will preclude facilities from completing the entire questionnaire if they are identified as not
textile mill operations or if the facility has never used PFAS as part of textile manufacturing.
Additionally, the questions are phrased with commonly used terminology and the tables are
organized in formats familiar to the respondent industry. Based on consultations with industry
representatives, the EPA expects that the majority of small entities will not meet the criteria to
complete the full questionnaire.

6.	CONSEQUENCE TO FEDERAL PROGRAM OR POLICY ACTIVITIES IF THE COLLECTION IS
NOT CONDUCTED OR IS CONDUCTED LESS FREQUENTLY AND ANY TECHNICAL OR
LEGAL OBSTACLES TO REDUCING BURDEN

The questionnaire and wastewater sampling program are to be administered one time only. If
the data collection is not conducted, the EPA will not be able to fulfill its statutory requirement

18


-------
March 2023

to consider revising the Textile Mills ELGs. The currently available data do not include
wastewater quantity and quality characteristics information, particularly for PFAS. Information
on pollution control practices and technologies is available in some permits and/or permit
applications, but this information requires manual review of permit and permit application
documents, permit applications may not be publicly available, and information would not be
available for all textile manufacturing facilities. In addition, if the national population of all
textile manufacturing facilities is not identified, it will not be possible to confirm whether
population estimates are accurate. Without the data sought in the questionnaire, the EPA will
be required to rely on the publicly available data listed in Section 4. In general, these data sets
are incomplete, inconsistent, and difficult to combine. The publicly available data are not
sufficient to assess the current industry population, evaluate subcategories in the current ELG
or future ELGs, assess use and discharge of PFAS, determine characteristics of wastewater and
wastewater treatment currently occurring at textile manufacturing facilities, or evaluate new
pollution control practices and technologies that are being used, especially for indirect
discharging facilities which comprise a significant portion of the sector.

The questionnaire will collect data from all textile manufacturing facilities on production
processes, PFAS use and discharge, wastewater and solid waste generated, and wastewater
management and treatment, (see Section 2(a) for more specific detail). Production data from
all facilities will help the EPA assess extent of PFAS use by textile manufacturing facilities and
relationships to production type and size, type of wastewater discharge, and other aspects of
facility operation including shifts in processing and seasonality. Data on wastewater generation
and management will allow the EPA to establish an accurate characterization of type and
quantity of PFAS in wastewater and develop a current profile of the textile mill industry to
estimate the pollutant mass loads discharged. Pollution prevention and wastewater treatment
details will provide insight into the type and design of current treatment technologies
employed and treatment system capabilities to reduce or eliminate PFAS discharge. Overall,
information on PFAS use and discharge, wastewater generation, and wastewater management
are limited and only available publicly for a small subset of the industry.

If this questionnaire is not conducted, the EPA would need to estimate or interpolate PFAS use,
control, and discharge data for the majority of facilities where data are not available. The EPA
will also not be able to evaluate current operations or wastewater treatment capabilities or
identify the extent to which PFAS and other pollutant discharges could be reduced or
eliminated within the industry. Without these analyses, determining whether it is necessary for
the EPA to develop new or revise existing ELGs would not be possible.

Wastewater sampling data collected through this ICR are critical for characterizing the
wastewater generated by textile manufacturing facilities and the wastewater discharged by
textile manufacturing facilities, as well as evaluating the effectiveness of pollution control
practices and technologies to reduce or eliminate PFAS in discharges. These characterization
data will be used to estimate current pollutant mass loads and achievable load reductions for
available technologies for the industry and to determine if the ELGs warrant revision. The EPA
has previously used publicly available data sets, such as effluent discharge characterization data

19


-------
March 2023

reported in discharge monitoring reports (DMRs), to characterize industry pollutant discharges.
Textile manufacturing facilities are not currently required to sample for and report PFAS in
DMRs, and data on the wastewater generated or discharged from indirect facilities are typically
not publicly available through national data sets. Publicly available PFAS concentration data is
available from a handful of state studies on a small subset of the textile mills industry. The EPA
additionally collected PFAS characterization data from fewer than 10 facilities through the 2021
Textile Mills 308 Request. These facilities were not required to conduct PFAS sampling through
the 308 Request; rather, they submitted PFAS characterization data that had been collected
through any previous sampling efforts. This data set represents an additional subset of facilities
within the industry and does not necessarily include PFAS characterization data for process
wastewaters. A wastewater sampling effort is necessary for the EPA to accurately characterize
PFAS discharges across the textiles manufacturing industry and determine if the ELGs warrant
revisions.

7.	SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES

There are no special circumstances. The collection of information is conducted in a manner
consistent with the guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.6.

8.	PUBLICATION OF THE FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICE AND PUBLIC RESPONSE
8(a) Federal Register Notice Publication

The EPA plans to publish a notice in the Federal Register announcing the Agency's intent to
submit a request for a new ICR and to collect comments on the draft initial questionnaire and
the draft list of textile manufacturing facilities in the United States. The notice will include a
description of the entities to be affected by the proposed questionnaire, a brief explanation of
the need for the questionnaire, identification of the authority under which the questionnaire
will be issued, and an estimate of burden to be incurred by questionnaire respondents. By
means of this notice, the Agency will request comments and suggestions regarding the
questionnaire and draft facility list and the reduction of data collection burden. The notice will
ask that the public submit all comments and suggestions within 60 days of the Federal Register
notice publication.

Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), the EPA will
specifically solicit comments and information to enable it to:

•	Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the Agency, including whether the information will
have practical utility.

•	Evaluate the accuracy of the Agency's estimate of burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used.

•	Enhance the quality, unity, and clarity of the information to be collected.

•	Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond.

20


-------
March 2023

The public comment period will be announced at the time of the publication of this request in
the Federal Register.

8(b) Consultations

The Engineering and Analysis Division (EAD) of the EPA's Office of Water has consulted with
individuals in the EPA Offices, Regions, and States. EAD has also engaged with local permitting
authorities and industry trade associations.

Consultations with the seven state environmental agencies, listed in Table 8-1, provided
information on the number, location, operations, and wastewater characteristics of textile
manufacturing facilities in these states. Additionally, state agencies provided important
perspectives on PFAS use and trends in textile manufacturing facilities. However, the EPA was
not able to conduct outreach to every state agency, nor did every state have the same types of
data or level of detail available for textile manufacturing facilities.

Table 8-1. State Agency Consultations

	State Environmental Agency	

Alabama Department of Environmental Management
Georgia Department of Natural Resources

Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE)

North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources

EPA will additionally request input from textile industry trade groups, including the National
Council of Textile Organization (NCTO), the Carpet and Rug Institute (CRI), and the American
Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists (AATCC) on the questionnaire and facility list
before administering the ICR.

9.	PAYMENT OR GIFT TO RESPONDENTS

No payments or gifts are provided to respondents.

10.	CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION CLAIMS

In accordance with 40 CFR, Part 2, Subpart B, the questionnaire informs respondents of their
right to claim information as CBI. The questionnaire provides instructions for asserting CBI
claims and informs respondents of the terms and rules governing the protection of CBI under
the Clean Water Act and 40 CFR §2.203(b). For each question which requests information that
may potentially be claimed as CBI, responses will have a corresponding CBI checkbox.
Respondents will be requested to check all CBI boxes which correspond to responses they claim
as CBI.

21


-------
March 2023

If no business confidentiality claim accompanies the information when it is received by the
EPA, the EPA may make the information available to the public without further notice. 40
CFR §2.203.

The EPA and its contractors will follow EAD's existing procedures to protect information
claimed as CBI. These procedures include the following:

•	Ensure secure handling of submitted and exported questionnaire data to preclude
access by unauthorized personnel.

•	Store exported questionnaire data and databases in secured areas of offices and system
networks and restrict access to authorized EPA and contractor personnel only.

•	Restrict any publication or dissemination of confidential results or findings to aggregate
statistics and coded listings. Individual respondents will not be identified in summary
reports.

The EPA has ensured that Qualtrics meets the EPA's regulations and policies for handling
information claimed as CBI. The EPA will design the Qualtrics questionnaire to require
authentication and verification of the respondents to allow access to the questionnaire, allow
users to mark information claimed as CBI, provide secure storage and limit access to the EPA
and the EPA's contractors, and require users to certify the completed questionnaire.

Each EPA contractor that collects, processes, or stores information claimed as CBI is responsible
for the proper handling of that information. Each contractor shall safeguard such information as
described in 40 CFR §2.211(d) and is obligated to use or disclose information only as permitted
by the contract under which the information is furnished.

11.	QUESTIONS OF A SENSITIVE NATURE

No sensitive questions pertaining to private or personal information, such as sexual behavior or
religious beliefs, will be asked in the questionnaire or as part of the wastewater sampling
program.

12.	ESTIMATES OF RESPONDENT BURDEN FOR THE INFORMATION COLLECTION
12(a) Estimate of Respondent Hour Burden

The Textile Mills industry data collection effort will require recipient facilities to devote time
and resources to produce acceptable responses to a questionnaire and, for a subset of facilities,
also collect samples to characterize the types and quantity of pollutants in textile
manufacturing wastewater. The EPA expects that wastewater treatment plant operators,
engineers, operations managers, and technical staff at the facilities will devote time toward
gathering requested information and data, preparing and submitting the final responses to the
questionnaire, coordinating and planning sampling with EPA staff, and collecting wastewater
samples. The costs to the respondents' facilities associated with these time commitments can

22


-------
March 2023

be estimated by multiplying the time spent in each labor category by an appropriately loaded
hourly labor rate.

To develop the burden estimates, the EPA estimated the number of hours required to complete
all parts of the questionnaire, including reviewing instructions, gathering data, entering the
information requested, reviewing responses, and submitting the questionnaire. Table 12-1
breaks down the burden (in hours) per anticipated respondent activity and per labor category
presumed necessary to complete the questionnaire. The EPA expects that wastewater
treatment plant operators (operators), engineers, and operations managers will all be involved
in responding to the questionnaire. The EPA has differentiated the hours that will be spent by
five different types of responses for the questionnaire:

1)	Full Response. Recipients that complete the full questionnaire. This includes facilities that
currently use PFAS in textile manufacture and facilities that have historically used PFAS in
textile manufacture.

2)	Not Applicable. The EPA expects that approximately 5 percent of the respondent population
have never manufactured textiles, and therefore do not fall within the population of interest
for the detailed study. These respondents will complete Section 1 of the questionnaire
(General Facility Information) and will be directed to the end of the questionnaire via
specific screening questions, resulting in less burden.

3)	Partial Response. Textile facilities that have never intentionally used PFAS to manufacture
textile products. The EPA expects that 25 percent of the respondent population have never
intentionally used PFAS, and therefore do not fall within population of interest for the
detailed study. These respondents will complete Sections 1 (General Facility Information)
and Section 2 (Textile Production) to develop an updated national population of textile
manufacturing facilities and will be directed to the end of the questionnaire via specific
screening questions. As a result, these facilities will not be required to complete large
portions of the questionnaire, resulting in less burden.

4)	No-Response. Recipients that do not submit response to the questionnaire. Although this
ICR will be mandatory, the typical no response rate for effluent guidelines questionnaires is
10 percent.

The EPA expects that questionnaire response will be led by the operator as most questions are
specific to wastewater generation and treatment. The EPA has included hours for engineering
staff to support collecting data and entering details related to production as well as the
operations manager to review the questionnaire response and coordinate submission.

Table 12-1. Estimated Questionnaire Response Burden by Activity, Labor Category, and Type

of Response

Activity

Not Applicable (non-textile manufacturing facilities that com

Lai

Operator

plete Sectioi

)or Categorv
Engineer

11 only)

and Burden

Operations
Manager

[hours)

Total Burden
per Activity

Review Instructions & Access Qualtrics Questionnaire

0.50

0.50

0.50

1.50

23


-------
March 2023

Table 12-1. Estimated Questionnaire Response Burden by Activity, Labor Category, and Type

of Response

Activity

Lai

Operator

)or Categorv
Engineer

and Burden

Operations
Manager

[hours)

Total Burden
per Activity

Complete Questionnaire Section 1

0.50

--

--

0.50

Review & Submission

--

--

0.50

0.50

Total

1.00

0.50

1.00

2.50

Partial Response (Non-PFAS textile manufacturing facilities that complete Sections 1 & 2 only)

Review Instructions & Access Qualtrics Questionnaire

0.50

0.50

0.50

1.50

Complete Questionnaire Section 1

0.50

--

--

0.50

Complete Questionnaire Section 2

1.50

--

--

1.50

Review & Submission

--

--

1.00

1.00

Total

2.50

0.50

1.50

4.50

Full Response (textile manufacturing facilities completing Section 1 through 7)

Review Instructions & Access Qualtrics Questionnaire

0.50

0.50

0.50

1.50

Complete Questionnaire Section 1

0.50

--

--

0.50

Complete Questionnaire Section 2

1.50

--

--

1.50

Complete Questionnaire Sections 3 through 7

8.00

3.00

--

11.00

Review & Submission

--

--

6.00

6.00

Total

10.50

3.50

6.50

20.50



Contact Helpline (10% of respondents expected to contact)

1.00

--

--

1.00

Note: the EPA assumes that questionnaire recipients that do not respond to the questionnaire will incur zero
burden.

In addition to completing the questionnaire, the EPA will require a subset of textile
manufacturing facilities (approximately 20) to collect wastewater samples and submit them to
an EPA-contracted laboratory. These facilities will collect one-time (one-day) grab samples
inform EPA analyses of the types and quantities of pollutants in textile manufacturing
wastewater. The EPA will develop a site -specific sampling plan for the 20 facilities selected for
sampling. The facilities will be asked to review and provide input on the sampling plan
developed by the EPA. The EPA will provide each facility with a sampling kit, with all sampling
supplies included. Facilities will be responsible for executing the sampling plan by collecting
samples, preserving samples, and shipping wastewater samples to specific laboratories
identified by the EPA. The EPA will contract with accredited analytical laboratories for each
method included in the sampling plan; facilities will ship wastewater samples according to
instructions provided by the EPA. By the EPA contracting directly with laboratories, this ensures
that all wastewater samples will be analyzed to the same precision and using the same method
for each analyte.

The EPA estimates that each facility will collect grab samples during one day from up to two
locations, such as the influent and effluent for the facility wastewater treatment system. The

24


-------
March 2023

exact sample locations may vary by facility based on the treatment system configuration and/or
type of operations. For the purposes of the ICR estimate, the EPA estimates that all facilities will
collect samples from two locations during the one-day sampling episode for a total of two
wastewater samples per facility. In addition, the EPA expects the facility will also collect one
quality assurance sample during the one-day sampling episode. These quality assurance
samples could include laboratory required quality assurance volumes or field quality assurance
samples. Table 12-2 presents estimated burden (in hours) for the one-day sampling episode on
a per facility basis by labor category. The EPA expects that operators and operations managers
will be involved in planning and implementing the wastewater treatment protocols.

Table 12-2. Estimated Burden for Sampling Program by Activity and Labor Category

Activity

Labor Category and Burden (hours)

Operator

Operations
Manager

Total Burden
per Activity

Pre-Sampling Episode Planning (e.g., pre-sampling
coordination with the EPA, input on site-specific sampling
plan)

8.00

4.00

12.00

Sampling Preparation (e.g., reviewing site-specific sampling
and analysis plan)

4.00

2.00

6.00

Sample Collection (e.g., 2 grab samples and 1 QA sample)

3.00

-

3.00

Sample Preservation/Shipment (e.g., preserving and cooling
samples, packing and preparing coolers for shipment)

3.00

-

3.00

Sampling Oversight

-

4.00

4.00

Total

18.00

10.00

28.00

12(b) Estimate of Respondent Labor Costs

The EPA obtained mean labor rates from the May 2021, United States Department of Labor,
Bureau of Labor Statistics website for NAICS code 313000 (Textile Mills). Table 12-3 presents
the labor data for 2022 (the latest year for which data are available) for the labor categories
representing an operator, engineer, and operations manager. To account for additional costs to
overhead and benefits, the EPA calculated a 30 percent increase in the mean hourly earnings
rate for each labor category. The EPA used these calculated labor rates for the burden
estimates.

25


-------
March 2023

Table 12-3. 2021 Mean Hourly Rates by Labor Category

Labor Category

Operatora

Engineer15

Operations Managerc

Mean Hourly Rates
($/hour)

30.30

49.61

65.52

Source: 2021 National Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates for NAICS Code 313000 Plant and System
Operator (occupation code 51-8000), Engineers (occupation code 17-2000), General and Operations Managers
(occupation code 11-1021), and Financial Specialist (13-2000).
https://www.bls.gOv/oes/current/naics4_332800.htm#00-0000

a - Operator unloaded mean hourly wage of $23.31/hour times 1.3 loading (overhead/benefits) = $30.30/hour.
b - Engineer unloaded labor rate of $38.16/hour times 1.3 loading (overhead/benefits) = $49.61/hour.
c - Operations manager unloaded labor rates of $50.40/hour times 1.3 loading (overhead/benefits) = $65.52/hour.

The direct labor cost to respondents to complete the questionnaire equals the time required to
read and understand all of the instructions, gather relevant information and data, transfer it to
the questionnaire response, review responses, and certify and submit the completed
questionnaire. The EPA calculated the estimated respondent burden for completion of the
questionnaire using the estimated total response time per activity shown in Table 12-1 as well
as the labor rates shown in Table 12-3 to calculate a total labor cost shown in Table 12-4. Table
12-4 includes estimates for the following types of respondents: non-textile manufacturing
facilities that complete Section 1 only (i.e., Not Applicable), textile manufacturing facilities that
have never used PFAS that complete Sections 1 and 2 only (i.e., Partial Response), and textile
manufacturing facilities that currently use or historically used PFAS that complete the full
questionnaire (i.e., Full Response).

Table 12-4. Total Estimated Respondent Labor Burden for the Questionnaire per Respondent

Response
Category

Operator Total
Labor Costs

Engineer Total
Labor Costs

Operations Manager
Total Labor Costs

Total Labor Burden Cost

Not Applicable

$30.30

$24.80

$65.52

$120.63

Partial Response

$75.76

$24.80

$98.28

$198.84

Full Response

$318.18

$173.63

$425.88

$917.69

Note: The EPA assumes that questionnaire recipients that do not respond to the questionnaire will incur zero
burden.

The total burden for the questionnaire equals the estimated burden per facility for all facilities
the EPA expects will respond. As noted previously in this supporting statement, for the
purposes of estimating burden to the industry, the EPA estimates the population of textile
manufacturing facilities at approximately 2,200. The EPA expects that some number of facilities
will not respond to the questionnaire. Although this ICR will be mandatory, the typical no
response rate for effluent guidelines questionnaires is 10 percent. The EPA also expects that
approximately 30 percent of the questionnaire population will not be required to complete the
full questionnaire because the facility does not perform textile manufacturing operations or has
never used PFAS as part of the textile manufacturing process. Table 12-5 includes the number
of respondents in each category (not applicable, full response, and no response), total burden,

26


-------
March 2023

and total cost for the industry to respond to the questionnaire. The values presented in Table
12-5 also include hours for a portion of the respondents to consult with the EPA's helpline. The
EPA estimates that 10 percent of the questionnaire respondents, both not applicable responses
and full responses, will spend 1 hour coordinating with the helpline. All values presented in
Table 12-5 are rounded to the nearest whole hour or dollar. The total labor cost associated with
the questionnaire is $1.41 million.

27


-------
March 2023

Table 12-5. Estimated Questionnaire Respondents by Response Category and Total Estimated Burden

Response
Category

Number of
Responses

Number of
Respondents
Contacting
Helpline

Total
Operator
Labor (hours)

Total
Engineer
Labor (hours)

Total
Operations
Manager
Labor (hours)

Total Labor
(hours)

Total
Operator
Labor Cost ($)

Total
Engineer
Labor Cost ($)

Total
Operations
Manager
Labor Cost ($)

Total Labor
Cost ($)

Not Applicable

110

11

121

55

110

286

$3,667

$2,728

$7,207

$13,602

Partial Response

550

55

1,430

275

825

2,530

$43,333

$13,642

$54,054

$111,029

Full Response

1,320

132

13,992

4,620

8,580

27,192

$424,000

$229,189

$562,162

$1,235,350

No Response

220

--

--

--

--

--

$-

$-

$-

$-

Total

2,200

198

15,818

4,950

10,065

30,008

$471,000

$245,560

$623,423

$1,339,982

28


-------
March 2023

For labor costs associated with sampling, the EPA assumed that all sampling activities described
in Section 12(a) will be completed by a combination of operators and the operations manager
as shown in Table 12-2. The EPA combined the hours presented in Table 12-2 with the labor
rates shown in Table 12-3 to estimate the labor cost. The total labor cost for sampling per
facility is shown in Table 12-6.

Table 12-6. Total Estimated Labor Burden for One-Day Sampling Episode per Facility

Operator Total Labor Cost ($)

Operations Manager Total Labor
Cost ($)

Total Labor Burden ($)

$545.45

$655.20

$1,200.65

Using the total industry labor cost for the questionnaire shown in Table 12-5 and the total labor
cost for sampling per facility shown in Table 12-6 combined with the number of facilities
participating in sampling, the EPA estimates the total labor cost associated with activities
described in this ICR. The total labor associated with the questionnaire and wastewater
sampling program is $1.4 million, as shown in Table 12-7.

Table 12-7. Total Estimated Respondent Labor Burden for Data Collection Activities

Activity

Number of Facilities Participating

Total Labor Burden (Dollars)

Questionnaire

2,200

$1,339,982

Wastewater Sampling

20

$24,013

Total

$1,363,995

29


-------
March 2023

13. TOTAL ANNUAL COST BURDEN TO RESPONDENTS OR RECORDKEEPERS RESULTING
FROM THE COLLECTION OF INFORMATION

13(a) Estimating Capital/Start-up Operating and Maintenance Costs

The EPA estimates there will be minimal other direct costs associated with responding to the
questionnaire. All information requested in the questionnaire should be available from existing
facility records and/or monitoring. Facilities are not required to collect and analyze additional
samples to respond to the questionnaire.

Other costs for completing the questionnaire include printing/duplicating working copies and
shipping for those respondents that are unable to respond to the online platform. The EPA has
assumed that 2 percent of questionnaire submittals will be mailed hardcopies as opposed to
online submittals. Most respondents will submit electronic questionnaire responses, which will
reduce burden and ensure efficient transfer of data. The EPA assumes all respondents will incur
a printing rate of $0.10 per page for a paper copy for use as a working copy or a hardcopy file.
The EPA also assumes that any facility submitting a paper response will return the completed
questionnaire via Federal Express or other trackable delivery service that requires a signature to
acknowledge receipt. The EPA also included cost for long distance phone charges. Although,
most facilities have access to cell phones or other internet-based phone mechanisms that do
not charge for long distance calls, the EPA has included these costs at $0.05 per minute for calls
into the helpline to cover facilities in rural areas.

Table 13-1 presents the estimated other direct costs for respondents related to the
questionnaire.

Table 13-1. Total Other Direct Costs for Respondents to the Questionnaire

Activity

Number of
Respondents

Total Printer/
Photocopying Cost

Total Shipping
Cost:

Total Phone/
Calling Costs

Total

Questionnaire

1,980

$5,940

$352

$594

$6,886

a - Assumes printing 30 pages for the questionnaire; $0.10/page print cost. Assumes all facilities will print the
questionnaire once as a working copy.

b - Assumes 2 percent of facilities submitting questionnaires (40 facilities) will send in a paper questionnaire via
Federal Express (or another shipper with tracking). Assumes $8.90 shipping fee/package.

c - Assumes 10 percent of facilities submitting questionnaires (1,980 facilities) will contact the helpline for 1 hour
at a rate of $3 / hour. The EPA expects this to be an overestimate of the long-distance costs associated with the
questionnaire.

As described in Section 12, a subset of textile manufacturing facilities (approximately 20
facilities) will be required to have facility staff collect wastewater samples and transfer them to
an EPA-contracted laboratory for analysis. This burden estimate assumes that the EPA will
contract directly with laboratories, provide each facility with a set of sampling supplies, and
pre-pay the costs to ship coolers to the facility and to the laboratory. The only sampling
supplies not provided by the EPA would be ice required to cool wastewater samples
immediately after collection and/or during preservation. Sampled facilities will be responsible

30


-------
March 2023

for any long-distance phone charges associated with planning. In addition to ice needed during
sample collection, the EPA estimates that each sampled facility will need to provide ice for
filling coolers and keeping samples at the proper temperature during shipping. The EPA
estimates these other direct costs associated with wastewater sampling include those elements
shown in Table 13-2.

Table 13-2. Total Other Direct Costs for Facilities Selected for Wastewater Sampling

Activity

Units Cost

Units

Number

Direct Cost ($)

Planning Calls (phone
charges)

$3.00

$ per hour

2 hours

$6.00

Sample Supplies Not Provided
by the EPA (ice)

$10.00

$ per

wastewater
sample

3 wastewater samples
per facility

$30.00

Total Cost per Facility

$36.00

Total Cost for Sampling at 20 Facilities

$720.00

13(b) Annualizing Capital Costs

The EPA estimates that there will be no recuring capital costs associated with responding to the
questionnaire or wastewater sampling. The one-time burden to respondents includes labor
costs described in Section 12 and other direct costs described in Section 13(a). Table 13-3
presents the total burden to the industry for the questionnaire and wastewater sampling.

Table 13-3. Total Estimated Respondent Burden and Cost Summary

Information Collection
Activity

Number of
Participating
Facilities

Total Burden
(Hours)

Total Labor Cost
($)

Total Other
Direct Cost
($)

Total Cost ($)

Questionnaire

2,200

30,008

$1,339,982

$6,886

$1,346,868

Wastewater Sampling

20

560

$24,013

$720

$24,733

Total

30,568

$1,363,995

$7,606

$1,371,601

The EPA estimates that the total burden to the industry for responding to the questionnaire
and wastewater sampling will be approximately 30,568 hours, or $1.37 million, including labor
and other direct costs.

Burden means the total time, effort, and financial resources expended by persons to generate,
maintain, retain, and disclose or provide information to or for a federal agency. This includes
the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and
systems to collect, validate, and verify information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any
previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to respond to a collection
of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and
transmit or otherwise disclose information. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently

31


-------
March 2023

valid OMB control number. The 0MB control number for the EPA's regulations are listed in 40
CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15.

To comment on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden
estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including the use of
automated collection techniques, the EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under
Docket ID No. The EPA-HQ-OW-2022-0869, which is available for public viewing at the Water
Docket in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW,
Washington, DC. An electronic version of the public docket is available through the Federal
Data Management System (FDMS) at http://www.iregullations.gov. Use FDMS to view and
submit public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the public docket, and to
access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically. Once in the
system, select "Advanced Search" then key in the Docket ID number identified above. Also, you
can send comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management
and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, DC. 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for the EPA.
Please include the EPA Docket ID No. (EPA-HQ-OW-2022-0869) in any correspondence.

14. ANNUALIZED COST TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

Table 14-1 presents an estimate of the burden and labor costs that the EPA will incur to
administer the questionnaire. The table identifies the collection administration tasks to be
performed by the EPA employees and contractors, with the associated hours required for each
grouping of related tasks. The EPA determined Agency labor costs by multiplying Agency
burden figures by an average hourly Agency labor rate ($48.41/hour) for technical and
managerial support using the Salary Table 2023-GS from the United States Office of Personal
Management. This table can be found at the website https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-
oversight/pay-leave/salaries-wages/salary-tables/23Tables/html/GS_h.aspx. The government
employee labor rates are $40.51 per hour for technical (GS-13, Stepl) and $56.31 per hour for
managerial (GS-15, Step 1). The EPA determined contractor labor costs by multiplying
contractor burden figures by an average contract labor rate of $130 per hour. This rate is
consistent with current Agency contracts.

Table 14-2 presents the other direct costs associated with administering the questionnaire that
will be incurred by the EPA. For the EPA and contractor other direct costs, the EPA assumed
mailing a cover letter announcing the questionnaire effort to all facilities and mailing hardcopy
questionnaires to 2 percent of all respondents as described in Section 13(a).

Table 14-3 presents a list of the tasks the EPA and its contractors will perform associated with
the wastewater sampling program. These tasks include the following:

•	Selecting facilities for wastewater sampling.

•	Developing site-specific sampling plans and coordinating with facilities.

•	Planning and conducting audits of each sampling episode.

•	Ordering sampling supplies and preparing sampling kits for each sampled facility.

32


-------
March 2023

•	Performing laboratory analysis and corresponding quality review for each
collected sample.

•	Reviewing and analyzing sampling results and documenting results of each
sampling episode.

Table 14-3 includes an estimate of the burden and labor costs for each task and the total labor
cost. Other direct costs associated with wastewater sampling include travel costs (for the EPA's
contractor staff to audit wastewater sampling at 4 facilities), costs associated with planning
calls, costs for sample collection supplies, shipping costs to get sampling kits to facilities,
shipping costs to transfer collected samples to analytical laboratories, and sample analysis
costs. Table 14-4 shows the other direct costs incurred by the EPA per sampled facility and the
total cost for all 20 sampled facilities.

Table 13-3 and Table 14-5 summarize the total costs that the industry and the Agency will incur
as a result of the ICR, respectively.

33


-------
March 2023

Table 14-1. Estimated Agency Burden and Labor Costs for the Questionnaire

Activity

Agency

Burden (hours
Contractor

)

Total Hours

Agency
($48.41/hour)

Labor Cost

Contractor
($130/hour)

Total Cost

Develop questionnaire instrument

200

1,000

1,200

$9,682

$130,000

$139,682

Meet with trade association representatives

100

200

300

$4,841

$26,000

$30,841

Publish notice of anticipated ICR in Federal Register

Respond to all comments received

Revise questionnaire instrument based on reviewers' comments

Design distribution approach

200

300

500

$9,682

$39,000

$48,682

Develop a mailing list database

Develop a system to track mailing and receipt activities to
improve mailing list

Develop notification letters

Mail questionnaire notification letters

Develop and maintain email and phone helplines

60

350

410

$2,905

$45,500

$48,405

Maintain helpline database and develop documentation

Track survey responses

200

575

775

$9,682

$74,750

$84,432

Review responses and assess potential for bias due to missing
data

Engineering follow-up to clarify responses

Develop questionnaire database

40

400

440

$1,936

$52,000

$53,936

Upload and verify data

Enter hardcopy survey responses

40

229

269

$1,936

$29,770

$31,706

Total

840

3,054

3,894

$40,664

$397,020

$437,684

34


-------
March 2023

Table 14-2. Estimated Other Direct Costs for the Agency to Administer the Questionnaire

Activity

Unit CostsJ

Number of Units'3

Total Cost ($)

Questionnaire Notification Mailout

$0.58

per letter

2,220

letters

$1,276

Hardcopy Questionnaires

$8.90

per package

44

packages

$392

Total

$1,668

a - Questionnaire notifications will be sent out via United States Postal Service with a letter. Hardcopy questionnaires will be sent via Federal Express (or
another shipper with tracking) at $8.90 shipping fee/package.

b - Assumes 2 percent of questionnaire respondents will not have access to the internet and request a hardcopy questionnaire.

Table 14-3. Estimated Agency Burden and Labor Costs for Wastewater Sampling

Activity

Agency

burden (hours
Contractor

)

Total Hours

Agency
($46.51/hour)

Labor Cost

Contractor
($130/hour)

Total Cost

Select facilities

40

40

80

$1,936

$5,200

$7,136

Develop site-specific sampling plans (e.g., pre-sampling calls with
facilities, developing site-specific sampling and analysis plans)

100

340

440

$4,841

$44,200

$49,041

Plan and conduct sampling audits

25

80

105

$1,210

$10,400

$11,610

Prepare sample collection kits

-

150

150

$--

$19,500

$19,500

Laboratory analysis and data review

80

500

580

$3,873

$65,000

$68,873

Process sampling data results, enter data into database, analyze
data, document results for the record in sampling episode reports

80

480

560

$3,873

$62,400

$66,273

Total for All Facilities

325

1,590

1,915

$15,733

$206,700

$222,433

35


-------
March 2023

Table 14-4. Estimated Other Direct Costs for the Agency for Wastewater Sampling

Activity

Unit Costs

Number of Units

Total Cost ($)

Planning Calls (phone charges)

$3.00

per hour

2

hours per facility

$6.00

Sample Collection Supplies (bottles,
labels, preservation supplies, sampling
equipment)

$250

per set of
supplies

1

set of supplies per
facility

$250

Sample Analysis

$700

per sample

3

wastewater and QA
samples per facility

$2,100

Shipping Costs (postage)

$110

per cooler

4

number of coolers
per facility (2 coolers
shipped to facility
and then labs)

$440

Total Cost per Facility

$2,796

Total Cost for 20 Facilities

$55,920

Table 14-5. Total Estimated Agency Burden and Cost Summary

Total Burden (hours)

Total Labor Cost ($)

Total Other Direct Cost ($)

Total Cost ($)

5,809

$660,118

$57,588

$717,705

The EPA estimates that the total burden to the Agency for the questionnaire and wastewater
sampling will be approximately 5,809 hours, or $717,705, including labor costs and other direct
costs. The EPA estimates that there will be no start-up or capital costs associated with
completing the questionnaire.

15.	REASON FOR ANY PROGRAM CHANGES OR ADJUSTMENTS IN BURDEN ESTIMATES
FROM THE PREVIOUS APPROVED ICR

Since this is a one-time information collection, there are no changes to the information
collection since the last OMB approval.

16.	COLLECTION OF INFORMATION WHOSE RESULTS WILL BE PUBLISHED
16(a) Technical Analyses Supported by the Questionnaire

Current ELGs do not contain requirements for PFAS; however, PFAS has been found in
wastewater discharges from facilities in the Textile Mills point source category, particularly in
those that manufacture performance apparel, carpets, outdoor gear, or other textiles meant to
provide water, oil, or stain resistance. The EPA will use the data collected through the
questionnaire and wastewater sampling program to determine if revisions to the Textile Mills
ELGs are warranted. If the EPA determines revisions are warranted, the EPA anticipates also
using data in support of future rulemaking efforts. The EPA will use the data collected through
the questionnaire to support the following types of analyses:

36


-------
March 2023

•	Subcategorization. The EPA will survey all textile manufacturing facilities to fully
capture the range of textile manufacture processes, PFAS use, wastewater types,
and pollution control practices and technologies for the sector. Data from the
respondents will help the EPA determine whether the existing subcategorization of
the industry is appropriate or additional/revised subcategorization is necessary for
the Textile Mills ELGs.

•	Evaluation of Textile Manufacture Processes and Wastewaters. The EPA will use
data collected to analyze textile manufacturing processes; PFAS use and potential
transfer to wastewater; wastewater generation and characteristics (including PFAS
concentrations and flow rates); and available and demonstrated pollution control
technologies and practices. The EPA will also analyze facility-wide pollution
prevention practices and wastewater treatment systems to determine the
wastewaters that contain PFAS, the treatment technologies that are applicable to
those wastewaters, the effectiveness of these treatment units, and the final
discharge characteristics from textile manufacturing facilities.

•	Technical Feasibility Analysis. The EPA will evaluate technically feasible technology
options, including control technologies and pollution prevention and recycle
practices, for the spectrum of textile manufacturing operations and facility
characteristics. The EPA will assess the technical feasibility of each technology
option by determining its availability within the industry as well as the degree to
which it effectively eliminates the generation of pollutants and/or removes or
destroys PFAS.

•	Assessment of Technology Costs. The EPA will use data collected to estimate the
industry-specific direct capital costs, operating and maintenance costs, and recurring
costs (e.g., waste disposal) of the pollution control technologies and practices, with a
focus of identifying technologies that can effectively reduce or eliminate PFAS. The
EPA will develop methodologies for estimating potential compliance costs
associated with installing additional technologies.

•	Revision to Effluent Limitations and Pretreatment Standards. The EPA may

determine that revised ELGs are necessary for the Textile Mills point source category
to address PFAS discharges. If so, the EPA will use data collected to support
statistical analysis of wastewater discharge data from textile manufacturing facilities
which have implemented PFAS pollution control technologies and management
practices.

•	Environmental Assessment and Environmental Justice. The EPA may perform an
environmental assessment to determine the potential impacts of textile
manufacturing discharges on aquatic life and human health, as well as on the proper
operation of POTWs and other treatment works. The EPA will also evaluate the
potential impact of textile manufacturing discharges of small, disadvantaged, or

37


-------
March 2023

minority communities. These assessments will characterize the potential risk posed
by the discharges and will assist the EPA in projecting the environmental and
economic benefits of potential revisions to the regulation.

16(b) Collection Schedule

The specific dates for distribution, response receipt, and data collection activities for the
questionnaire have not yet been established but will include the activities in Table 16-1.

Table 16-1. Collection Schedule

Activity

Estimate of Schedule

EPA notification to questionnaire recipients

15 days after OMB Approval

Facilities submit responses

60 days following receipt

Review responses and evaluates need for follow-up

3 months following questionnaire
completion

Conduct follow-up to collect all missing or incomplete information

2 months following initial response
review

Complete questionnaire database

4 weeks after receiving follow-up
information

Select and notifies facilities for wastewater sampling

3 months following questionnaire
completion

Wastewater sampling data collection occurs

2 months following notification

Wastewater sampling data reviewed and analytical database populated

4 months following sampling analytical
data receipt

16(c) Publication of Results

All responses containing or consisting of information claimed as CBI will be so identified in the
questionnaire database. The EPA regulations governing CBI appear at 40 CFR Part 2, Subpart B.

Information that has not been claimed as CBI may be shared with any interested parties.
Nonexempt information is not protected from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA). Results of the EPA's analyses become publicly available most often in three ways: (1)
within materials placed in the public docket supporting the rulemaking, (2) within development
and supporting documents otherwise published in support of the rulemaking, and (3) within
any proposed and final rules published in the Federal Register if the data is to be used in any
rulemaking effort. These documents are available through the EPA's website and on
regulations.gov.

17. DISPLAY OF THE EXPIRATION DATE FOR OMB APPROVAL OF THE INFORMATION
COLLECTION

The EPA plans to display the expiration date for OMB approval of the information collection on
all instruments.

38


-------
March 2023

18. CERTIFICATION FOR REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSIONS

The EPA can comply with all provisions of the Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act
Submissions.

39


-------
March 2023

PART B OF THE SUPPORTING STATEMENT
1. QUESTIONNAIRE RATIONALE

The census questionnaire and subsequent wastewater sampling program for textile
manufacturing facilities will provide information essential to determining if there is a need for
developing revised regulations under Section 304(m) of the Clean Water Act. These data are
necessary for characterizing the nationwide status of textile manufacturing facilities' locations,
types of operations, PFAS use, wastewater generation and management, wastewater
characteristics, available pollution control technologies and practices.

1(a) Population of Interest

The EPA intends to use responses from the questionnaire and data collected through the
wastewater sampling program to inform further and more detailed analyses in the future. The
EPA first plans to administer a questionnaire as a census to all textile manufacturing facilities in
the United States, regulated at 40 CFR Part 410, to determine a national population. Based on
data collected from sources listed in Table 4-1, the EPA has identified and compiled mailing
addresses for approximately 2,200 textile manufacturing facilities in the United States. All
active textile manufacturing facilities that conduct one or more of the specified operations will
be required to complete the questionnaire regardless of size, geography, ownership,
production, and whether the facility discharges wastewater directly to surface waters,
indirectly to surface waters through POTWs, or does not discharge wastewater at all. To obtain
valuable information on the industry's wastewater management practice as specifically regards
PFAS, the EPA has tailored the questionnaire to require only a subset of facilities in the Textile
Mills point source category that have used PFAS in textile manufacturing operations to provide
a complete response.

A subset of textile manufacturing facilities that complete the questionnaire (up to 20) will also
be required to collect wastewater samples and submit for analysis. The EPA will determine the
specific facilities to participate in the wastewater sampling program based on technical
information collected through the questionnaire.

1(b) Response Rate/No Response

The EPA's Office of Water plans to administer the data collection, including a one-time
questionnaire and wastewater sampling program, under the authority of Section 308 of the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 USC., Section 1318. All recipients of the questionnaire
and wastewater sampling request will be required to participate and submit a complete
response.

No response is relatively low for questionnaires sent under the authority of Clean Water Act
Section 308. The typical no response rate for effluent guidelines questionnaires is 10 percent.
The EPA will employ several measures to reduce no response. The cover letter and instructions
delivered to each recipient will explain the legal authority, responsibility to respond, reasons for

40


-------
March 2023

the questionnaire, and penalty for no response. Delivery or nondelivery of cover letters will be
tracked using United States Postal Service or other traceable delivery option; thus, signatures of
the recipients will be required to confirm receipt. Email and phone helplines will be operated
while the questionnaire is in the field so that technical, financial, and administrative questions
can be addressed. Recipients not responding to the questionnaire by the deadline date may be
phoned or notified again by mail to encourage response, to answer questions, and to
determine the reason(s) for the no response.

To minimize no response, the EPA solicited comments on a draft list of questions and worked
closely with industry experts to refine questions so that they are easy to understand with
clearly defined and familiar terms, are formatted in a logical sequence, and request data that
are readily available within the industry. In this manner, the EPA expects to minimize inaccurate
or incomplete responses to questions that can occur due to misunderstanding and
misinterpretation as well as the unintentional skipping of questions by respondents who
respond via hardcopy (the electronic version of the questionnaire will prevent incomplete
submissions).

The EPA will design and implement the questionnaire to reduce errors by:

•	Reviewing question language for ambiguity and clarity.

•	Using an easily followed sequence of questions and stopping points.

•	Avoiding questions requiring an open-ended response.

•	Providing limited number of carefully considered responses to each question.

•	Providing clear definitions of units of measurement and of technical terms.

•	Providing clear instructions with references to the definitions.

•	Providing helplines via email and a toll-free number to assist respondents.

•	Performing technical review of responses by engineers and scientists, who will
phone respondents to obtain missing information and resolve problems and
inconsistencies.

•	Using a web-based questionnaire platform (Qualtrics) to require completion of all
required questions.

•	Requiring specific response formats (e.g., numeric values where a number is
requested) and acceptable value ranges.

•	Conducting a 100 percent check of manual data entry for hardcopy submittals.
2. COLLECTION OF INFORMATION

2(a) Stratification/Sample Selection

As the questionnaire is to be distributed as a census, no stratification or sampling scheme has
been designed. The main data sources that contributed to the list of textile manufacturing
facilities (recipients) are described in Part A, Section 4.

41


-------
March 2023

3.	ESTIMATION PROCEDURE

As this questionnaire is designed as a census and response is mandatory, no sample size
estimation is needed. However, there will be some no response, thus the EPA will not have
perfect information and will analyze this after results are received.

The EPA estimated the response rate when calculating the sample size based on historic data
and information from the ICR conducted in support of the previous ELGs. As noted previously in
this supporting statement, the typical no response rate for ELGs questionnaires is 10 percent
and the EPA expects the no response rate to this questionnaire to be similar.

4.	ACCURACY/PRECISION

As this questionnaire is designed as a census and respondents are the best available sources of
information and data for their facilities, accuracy and precision concerns are not an issue.

5.	SPECIALIZED SAMPLING PROCEDURES

No special sampling procedures are planned for this questionnaire.

6.	DATA COLLECTION

This will be a single incident data collection; no periodic data collection is planned. Under this
ICR, the EPA intends to conduct a questionnaire of textile manufacturing facilities within the
Textile Mills point source category. The collection methods for each of these efforts have been
described previously in this supporting statement.

7.	RESPONSE RATE/NO RESPONSE/DATA UTILITY
7(a) Response Rate

The EPA expects that the response rate will be relatively high for this mandatory questionnaire
effort, which will be conducted under the authority of Section 308 of the Clean Water Act. The
sample size for the questionnaire is 2,200 facilities. The typical no response rate for effluent
guidelines questionnaires is 10 percent. The EPA would strive to improve the response rate by
reminder letters, emails, and/or phone calls. Furthermore, after receiving the responses, the
EPA intends to adjust the questionnaire weights based on the actual no response rate and to
review publicly available information to determine if nonrespondents appear to have different
characteristics than respondents. The EPA would examine these characteristics both for the
entire industry and for subgroups in the analyses. For any differences, the EPA intends to
determine the major causes, and to incorporate appropriate adjustments for bias.1

1 Bias is the difference between the expected value of an estimate and the true value of a parameter or quantity
being estimated. If the data collection process generates estimates that are consistently (or on average) above or
consistently below the true value, the data collection process is biased.

42


-------
March 2023

7(b) No Response

The EPA recognizes that some no response is unavoidable, and in past questionnaire efforts,
has waived the duty to respond in extreme and rare cases (e.g., natural disasters) which also
might occur for this survey effort. As noted throughout this supporting statement, the EPA will
implement efforts to reduce no response, including use of an easy-to-use format, operating
helplines, and following up with potential nonrespondents.

7(c) Burden Reduction

The EPA designed the questionnaire to include burden-reducing features. The questionnaire
contains initial screening questions that direct respondents that do not qualify as textile
manufacturing facilities to indicate their status and then submit their initial responses without
the need to respond to the remaining questions. Additionally, the questionnaire will contain
screening questions which direct respondents to skip questions or whole sections that
reference activities or operations that are not conducted at the facility. The questionnaire also
groups similar topic questions together and will offer drop-down menu and checkbox selections
to simplify responses, thus minimizing the number of text responses requiring input.

The questionnaire consists of 38 questions and should not require a burden of more than 21
hours (on average) for each facility's respondents to complete, verify, and submit. The EPA will
implement the questionnaire online which will facilitate access and completion.

For those respondents without internet access, the cover letter and instruction packet will
inform the respondent on how to request a paper questionnaire that can then be completed
and mailed to the EPA's contractor for input into the electronic system. The EPA therefore
concludes that completing the questionnaire does not represent an overly burdensome task.

7(d) Data Utility

The data collected through this ICR will serve to update current information, fill in missing data,
and profile the universe of textile manufacturing facilities in the United States with sufficient
information to determine if revisions to ELGs are warranted. Subsequently, if the EPA pursues a
rulemaking, data will be used to conduct further analyses of the Textile Mills point source
category and support further studies, proposed and/or final rulemaking analyses.

8. TESTS OF PROCEDURES

The EPA does not intend to pre-test the questionnaire. For more than 30 years, EAD has
conducted surveys of numerous industrial sectors to collect information to support regulation
development activities in the effluent guidelines program. While the EPA develops different
questionnaires for each industry, there are common elements for all industries. The
questionnaires collect the same basic data such as information about processes, treatment, and
financial status. Thus, when the EPA develops a questionnaire for a particular industry, it
generally tailors the questions for specific terms and processes used by that industry. In past

43


-------
March 2023

years, the EPA has relied on active participation by trade groups and their members in
reviewing the questionnaires. In the EPA's experience, such collaboration generally tends to
better reflect the industry at large than pre-tests. As discussed in Part A of this supporting
statement, the EPA has already engaged several trade associations regarding this data
collection. The EPA expects to continue to discuss and refine this questionnaire with industry
experts prior to implementation. For this reason, the EPA considers additional review through
the pre-test process to be unnecessary for this industry.

9. CONTACT INFORMATION

EPA: Paul Shriner	Shriner.paul@epa.gov

44


-------